HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 12132011 - SD.4RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Resolution No. 2011/499, which supercedes Resolution No. 2011/354, regarding
compensation and benefits for the County Administrator, County Elected and Appointed
Department Heads, Management, Exempt, and Unrepresented employees to reflect changes
as recommended by the County Administrator.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of CCCERA Administration, including the Retirement Chief Executive Officer's
salary, is charged out to County departments through the Countywide cost allocation plan
and is a County cost. The Sheriff’s managers and the County each paying 100% of their
respective retirement contributions nets out to a County cost of approximately $57,000 per
year. The savings from the new pension tier will be significant over time.
BACKGROUND:
The Retirement Board, which sets the benefits for the Retirement Chief Executive Officer,
gave notice to the County that the benefit changes recently made for the County Elected and
Appointed Department Heads, Management, Exempt, and
Unrepresented Employees, should not apply to the Retirement Chief Executive Officer.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 12/13/2011 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I
Supervisor
Gayle B. Uilkema, District II
Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Ted Cwiek, (925)
335-1766
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: December 13, 2011
David Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Ted Cwiek, Human Resources Director, Robert Campbell, County Auditor-Controller
SD. 4
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Ted Cwiek, Human Resources Director
Date:December 13, 2011
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Revised Management Benefits Resolution No. 2011/499, which supercedes Resolution No. 2011/354
Accordingly, the following changes have been made to the Management Resolution:
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
A new Subsection (5.11) has been added to Section 5 and the original subsections
have been renumbered. The new Subsection 5.11 only applies to the Retirement
Chief Executive Officer and it reinstates the 50% subvention by the County of the
retirement contribution normally required of the Retirement Chief Executive
Officer. All other employees covered by this resolution must continue to pay 100%
of the employee share of their retirement contribution.
1.
Section 14 has been modified to provide for seventy (70) hours per year of Annual
Management Administrative Leave for the Retirement Chief Executive Officer,
instead of the ninety four (94) hours per year granted to all other employees covered
by this resolution.
2.
A new subsection (C.) has been added to Section 16 that authorizes the Retirement
Chief Executive Officer to sell one third of her annual vacation accruals once each
calendar year. All other employees covered by this resolution who were hired before
April1, 2011, may sell one third of their annual vacation accruals once every
thirteen months.
3.
In addition to the above changes affecting the Retirement Chief Executive Officer,
Section 54 of the resolution has been modified in the following ways:
For managers in the Sheriff’s Department, Section 54 has been modified to add
Safety Tier D, the new safety retirement tier recently negotiated by the Deputy
Sheriffs’ Association. Further, Subsections 54.10 and 54.11 now provide that
effective on June 29, 2013, the Sheriff’s managers and the County will each begin to
pay 100% of their respective retirement contributions.
4.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Benefit changes not made by the Board of Retirement would be in place with respect to
the Retirement Chief Executive Officer; and, the County will incur costs for benefits for
unrepresented Sheriff's Department employees inconsistent with the benefits of their
represented counterparts.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
None.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2011/499
Body of Resolution No. 2011/499
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Exhibit C
Exhibit D
Exhibit E