HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 09202011 - C.14RECOMMENDATION(S):
RECEIVE public report of litigation settlement agreements that became final during the
period of August 1, 2011 - August 31, 2011, as recommended by the County Counsel.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Settlement amounts are listed below.
BACKGROUND:
Four agreements to settle pending litigation, as defined in Government Code section
54956.9, became final during the period of August 1, 2011 - August 31, 2011.
First National Bank of Northern California v. Contra Costa County, et al., CCC Sup. Ct.
Case No. C11-00988. This case arose out of the defective installation of curb and gutter
improvements in a Martinez-area subdivision. As part of a settlement and release
agreement, the plaintiff agreed to pay the County $70,000 in delinquent subdivision fees
and correct the defective curb and gutter. The Board authorized settlement on July 12, 2011,
in closed session, by a 5-0 vote. The settlement became
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 09/20/2011 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Gayle B. Uilkema, District II
Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Thomas Geiger,
925-335-1800
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: September 20, 2011
David Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C.14
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Sharon L. Anderson, County Counsel
Date:September 20, 2011
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:RECEIVE public report of litigation settlement agreements that became final during the period of August 1,
2011 - August 31, 2011.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
final on August 18, 2011.
Dean Thomas Pratt, et al. v. East Bay Municipal Utility District, County of Contra Costa,
CCC Sup. Ct. Case No. C10-00736. This case involved damage resulting from a tree branch
that fell onto a car driving on a County-maintained road. As part of a settlement and release
agreement, the Board of Supervisors authorized payment of $325,000 to the two plaintiffs,
inclusive of attorney fees and costs. The Board authorized settlement on August 9, 2011, in
closed session, by a 5-0 vote. The settlement became final on August 23, 2011. The
settlement amount is paid through the Risk Management Liability Internal Service Fund.
Contra Costa County v. Diamond Properties, et al., CCC Sup. Ct. Case No. C10-00248.
This was an action to acquire certain property by eminent domain in the Antioch area as
part of the State Route 4 East – Somersville Road to Route 160 widening project. It was
agreed that the defendants would convey all necessary property interests to the County for
$525,000. The Board of Supervisors authorized settlement in closed session on June 7,
2011, by a 4-0 vote, Supervisor Piepho absent. Judgment pursuant to the parties’ stipulation
was entered on August 9, 2011. The settlement amount was paid through Contra Costa
Transportation Authority funds.
Contra Costa County v. Khatri, et al., CCC Sup. Ct. Case No. C10-01131. This was an
action to acquire certain property by eminent domain in the Antioch area as part of the State
Route 4 East – Somersville Road to Route 160 widening project. It was agreed that the
defendants would convey all necessary property interests to the County for $700,000. The
Board of Supervisors authorized settlement in closed session on July 26, 2011, by a 5-0
vote. Judgment pursuant to the parties’ stipulation was entered on August 22, 2011. The
settlement amount was paid through Contra Costa Transportation Authority funds.
This report includes final settlements of litigation matters handled by the Office of the
County Counsel. This report does not include litigation settlements that were previously
reported orally in open session or by the Risk Management Division of the County
Administrator’s Office as a consent item on the Board’s open session agenda.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The report would not be accepted.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
Not applicable.