HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10122021 - Board of SupervisorsCALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
AND FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES GOVERNED BY THE BOARD
BOARD CHAMBERS, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 1025 ESCOBAR STREET
MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-1229
DIANE BURGIS, CHAIR, 3RD DISTRICT
FEDERAL D. GLOVER, VICE CHAIR, 5TH DISTRICT
JOHN GIOIA , 1ST DISTRICT
CANDACE ANDERSEN, 2ND DISTRICT
KAREN MITCHOFF, 4TH DISTRICT
MONICA NINO, CLERK OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, (925) 655-2075
PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES.
A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR.
To slow the spread of COVID-19, the Health Officer’s Shelter Order of September 14, 2020, prevents public gatherings (Health Officer Order). In lieu
of a public gathering, the Board of Supervisors meeting will be accessible via television and live-streaming to all members of the public as permitted by
the Governor’s Executive Order N29-20. Board meetings are televised live on Comcast Cable 27, ATT/U-Verse Channel 99, and WAVE Channel 32,
and can be seen live online at www.contracosta.ca.gov.
PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON
THE AGENDA MAY CALL IN DURING THE MEETING BY DIALING 888-251-2949 FOLLOWED BY THE ACCESS CODE 1672589#.
To indicate you wish to speak on an agenda item, please push "#2" on your phone.
All telephone callers will be limited to two (2) minutes apiece. The Board Chair may reduce the amount of time allotted per telephone caller at
the beginning of each item or public comment period depending on the number of calls and the business of the day. Your patience is
appreciated.
A lunch break or closed session may be called at the discretion of the Board Chair.
Staff reports related to open session items on the agenda are also accessible on line at www.contracosta.ca.gov.
ANNOTATED AGENDA & MINUTES
October 12, 2021
9:00 A.M. Convene, call to order and opening ceremonies.
Closed Session
A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code § 54957.6)
Agency Negotiators: Monica Nino.
Employee Organizations and Unrepresented Employees: Public Employees Union, Local 1; AFSCME Locals 512 and 2700; California
Nurses Assn.; SEIU Locals 1021 and 2015; District Attorney Investigators’ Assn.; Deputy Sheriffs Assn.; United Prof. Firefighters
I.A.F.F., Local 1230; Physicians’ & Dentists’ Org. of Contra Costa; Western Council of Engineers; United Chief Officers Assn.;
Contra Costa County Defenders Assn.; Contra Costa County Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; Prof. & Tech. Engineers IFPTE, Local
21; Teamsters Local 856; and all unrepresented employees.
B. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
Title: Public Defender
C. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT
Title: Director of Child Support Services
Inspirational Thought- "If you ever find yourself in the wrong story, leave. ~Mo Willems, author
Present: John Gioia, District I Supervisor; Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor; Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor; Karen Mitchoff,
District IV Supervisor; Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Staff Present:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Mary Ann Mason, County Counsel
There were no announcements from Closed Session.
CONSIDER CONSENT ITEMS (Items listed as C.1 through C.52 on the following agenda) – Items are subject to removal from
CONSIDER CONSENT ITEMS (Items listed as C.1 through C.52 on the following agenda) – Items are subject to removal from
Consent Calendar by request of any Supervisor or on request for discussion by a member of the public. Items removed from the
Consent Calendar will be considered with the Discussion Items.
PRESENTATIONS (5 Minutes Each)
PRESENTATION recognizing October as National Disablility Awareness Month and commemorating the 76th anniversary.
(Supervisors Burgis, Gioia, Andersen, Mitchoff and Glover)
DISCUSSION ITEMS
D.1 CONSIDER declaring COVID-19 misinformation as a public health crisis. (Supervisor Gioia and Supervisor Mitchoff)
(See Item C.14)
Melanie Cardell, Contra Costa; Susan Griffith; Michelle Baca, Discovery Bay; Laquetta Franz, Antioch; Eva, Oakley; No
name given; Kathy Garrett; Lacey Bustos, Oakley; John B., Danville; Ashley; Carolyn Stein; David Walnut creek; Cassie,
Bay Point; Jeanette; No name given; Susan Rock; Randy, Contra Costa; No name given; No name given; Mary, Pleasant
Hill; Resident of Contra Costa; Angelica Moffitt; Linda, Discovery Bay; Alex, Discovery Bay; Jean Swash; Liz Richie; Joseph
Grives, Alameda-Contra Costa Medical Association; Brock Lynborn; Lindsey; Brian; Jason, Hercules; Julie freestone; Mike
McDermott; Nocole; Leah Russen, Director Vaccinate California; Pete Keaty, San Ramon; Lee, Contra Costa; Diana
Hoenig, Multi-Faith Action Coalition; Danny; Sonny; David Rugley; Mary Schreiber; Kinberly Madison; Cheryl Sudduth;
Addie; Jean Fulme, Lafayette; Elsa Stephens, Richmond; J.S.; C. Melenna; Marilyn; User 2; Larry Best; Tyler; Dee; Carol;
Karen Hernandez; Emma; Teens; David Jones; Kasimir Carbo, Fire Protection District; Leslie.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.2 ACCEPT update on COVID-19; and PROVIDE direction to staff. (Anna Roth, Health Services Director and Dr. Ori
Tzvieli, Deputy Director)
Nicole Fox; Liz Ritchie; Jackie; Mike McDermott.
D.3 HEARING to consider adopting Ordinance No. 2021-33 and Resolution No. 2021/318, to adjust transportation mitigation
fees and update the project list for the Central County Area of Benefit (AOB), and to re-establish the boundaries of that AOB,
and abolish the South Walnut Creek AOB; and to consider determining the existing South Walnut Creek AOB fund balance
will be reallocated to projects that will serve developments that paid those funds, Central County area. (Jerry Fahy, Public
Works Department)
On the date of publication of the agenda, a technical glitch prevented the Resolution No. 2021/318 from inclusion. By
unanimous vote, with all Supervisors present, the Better Government Ordinance 96 hour notification is waived and
the resolution is accepted into the meeting materials for consideration.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.4 HEARING to consider the proposed formation of Zone 3008 within County Service Area P-6 (Police Services) for
Subdivision No. 9491, a 2.73-acre site located at 16500 San Pablo Avenue in the unincorporated San Pablo area of the County
for County File #SD18-9491. (Jennifer Cruz, Department of Conservation and Development)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.5 HEARING to consider adopting Resolution No. 2021/324 and Ordinance No. 2021-28, authorizing the levy of a special tax
for police protection services in Zone 3008 of County Service Area P-6 for Subdivision No. 9491 (County File #SD18-9491), a
2.73-acre site located at 16500 San Pablo Avenue in the unincorporated San Pablo area of the County, and fixing an election
on December 14, 2021 to obtain voter approval. (Jennifer Cruz, Department of Conservation and Development)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.6 HEARING to consider the proposed formation of Zone 3114 within County Service Area P-6 (Police Services) for
Subdivision No. 9478, a 6.4-acre site located at 1098 Balmore Court in the El Sobrante area of the County, for County File
#SD17-9478. (Jennifer Cruz, Department of Conservation and Development)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.7 HEARING to consider adopting Resolution No. 2021/326 and Ordinance No. 2021-27, authorizing the levy of a special tax
D.7 HEARING to consider adopting Resolution No. 2021/326 and Ordinance No. 2021-27, authorizing the levy of a special tax
for police protection services in Zone 3114 of County Service Area P-6 for Subdivision No. 9478 (County File #SD17-9478), a
6.4-acre site located at 1098 Balmore Court in the El Sobrante area of the County, and fixing an election on December 14, 2021
to obtain voter approval. (Jennifer Cruz, Department of Conservation and Development)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
D.8 CONSIDER accepting the Measure X Community Advisory Board Report to the Contra Costa County Board of
Supervisors, CONSIDER approving the advisory board’s request for $20,000 to contract for a report writer, and DIRECT that
this matter return to the Board on November 2 to provide direction to staff. (Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director)
Speakers: Raul Vasquez; Susan, Concord; Lisa Kirk; Ilsa Stephens, ACCE; Reverend Sophi DeWitt, East Bay
Housing Organization; Roxanne Garza; GiGi Crowder; Debbie Toth; Jane, David Sharples, ACCE; Diana Hoenig;
Larry Best, California Emergine Technoloty EP Fund; Mary Blumberg Nalgoza, Gen Vocal For Victims; Jan
Warren; Francisco Torres, ACCE; Veronica Benjamin; Susan Boreliaz, Diablo Valley Ballet; Jann Intereset; Joanne
Supersad; Dan Geiger; Sean Gilbert; Susan; Cheryl Sudduth.
Written correspondence received from Amanda Brown-Steverns, Executive Director, Greenbelt Alliance; Susan
Boreliz, Executive Director, Diablo Ballet; Mary Knox, President, Board of Directors, getVOCAL for Victims
(attached).
ACCEPTED the Measure X Community Advisory Board Report; SCHEDULED the advisory board’s request for
$20,000 to contract for assistance in compiling and writing an updated formal Needs Assessment report to return to
the Board on November 2, 2021.
D. 9 CONSIDER Consent Items previously removed.
Item C.14 was heard under presentations and adopted as presented.
D. 10 PUBLIC COMMENT (2 Minutes/Speaker)
Justin Decker, staff representative Local IFPTE 1021, spoke on the office working conditions at Veterans Services
that have resulted in the resignation of several employees, leaving the department understaffed;
Sean Stalbon, IFPTE 1021,requested assistance in protecting staff at the Veterans Services Office, saying the there is a
toxic work environment there.
D. 11 CONSIDER reports of Board members.
There were no items reported today.
ADJOURN
Adjourned today's meeting at 6:45 p.m.
CONSENT ITEMS
Road and Transportation
C. 1 APPROVE the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budget for the Congestion Management Agency (CMA) and APPROVE FY 2021/22
County contributions of $144,576 to the CMA and $95,393 to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees that assist
with implementing Measure J (2004), as recommended by the Conservation and Development Director. (50% Gas Tax, 50%
Measure J Return-to-Source revenue)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 2 ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/311 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a
portion of Marsh Creek Road between Camino Diablo and Vineyard Parkway (City of Brentwood), on November 15, 2021 and
November 19, 2021 from 8:30 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., for the purpose of strength testing gas transmission pipeline. (No fiscal
impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 3 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with TRC Engineers, Inc., in
C. 3 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with TRC Engineers, Inc., in
an amount not to exceed $350,000 for on-call construction management services for the period October 12, 2021 through
September 30, 2024, Countywide. (100% Various Funds)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 4 APPROVE the Rodeo Pedestrian Enhancement Project contingency fund increase of $5,000 for a new contingency fund
total of $24,091, and a new payment limit of $215,001, for additional services, effective October 12, 2021, as recommended by
the Public Works Director, Rodeo area. (33% Transportation Development Act Grant Funds, 67% Local Road Funds)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 5 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract change order with American
Pavement Systems, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $325,000 for additional costs associated with the 2020 Surface Treatment
Project, Alamo, El Sobrante, and North Richmond areas. (100% Local Road Funds)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Engineering Services
C. 6 ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/315 accepting completion of the warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement, and release
of cash deposit for faithful performance, subdivision SD12-09298, for a project developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., as
recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (100% Developer Fees)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 7 ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/316 accepting completion of the warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement, and release
of cash deposit for faithful performance, subdivision SD17-09299, for a project developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., as
recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (100% Developer Fees)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 8 ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/317 accepting completion of the warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement, and release
of cash deposit for faithful performance, subdivision SD17-09300, for a project developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., as
recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (100% Developer Fees)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Special Districts & County Airports
C. 9 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to execute a month-to-month hangar rental agreement
with Fred McDonald and Fionn O’Neill for a modernized, large north-facing hangar at Buchanan Field Airport effective
October 1, 2021 in the monthly amount of $640.00, Pacheco area (100% Airport Enterprise Fund).
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 10 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to execute an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with
Concord Aero 10, LLC, for the negotiation of a long-term lease of approximately 9-acres of land on the west side of the
Buchanan Field Airport, Concord/Pacheco area. (100% Airport Enterprise Fund)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Claims, Collections & Litigation
C. 11 DENY claims filed by Jacqueline Moskus, Alisha M. Rohrbacher, and Thomas Rohrbacher.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Honors & Proclamations
C. 12 ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/320 recognizing October 16, 2021 as Community Cat Day in Contra Costa County, as
recommended by the Animal Services Director.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 13 ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/330 proclaiming October 24–30, 2021 as Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week, as
recommended by the Health Services Director.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 14 ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/337 declaring COVID-19 misinformation as a public health crisis, as recommended by
Supervisors Gioia and Mitchoff.
Item C.14 was considered under item D.1 to allow for discussion and subsequently adopted as presented
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 15 ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/338 recognizing the 60th Anniversary of the City of Pleasant Hill, as recommended by
Supervisor Mitchoff.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 16 ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/340 recognizing and commemorating the 76th anniversary of National Disability
Employment Awareness Month, as recommended by Supervisors Burgis, Gioia, Andersen, Mitchoff, and Glover.
Speakers: No name given; Jamal Burrell, San Francisco; Otto Iber; Cheryl Sudduth; Debbie Toth.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Appointments & Resignations
C. 17 REAPPOINT Clark Wallace to the District 3 seat on the Assessment Appeals Board for a term ending September 3,
2023, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 18 APPOINT, in lieu of election, Don Wagenet to the Board of Trustees of Reclamation District No. 2024 (Orwood and
Palm Tracts) for a term ending December 2025, as recommended by the County Administrator.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 19 APPOINT, in lieu of election, James Price, Arthur John Hanson, and Walter Pierce to serve on the Board of Trustees of
Reclamation District 799 (Hotchkiss Tract) each for terms of four years, as recommended by the County Administrator.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 20 APPOINT Lara DeLaney to Management Seat #1 and Amrita Kaur to Management Seat #2 on the Advisory Council on
Equal Employment Opportunity to complete the current terms ending on November 30, 2022, and November 30, 2024,
respectively, as recommended by the Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 21 APPROVE the new medical staff appointments and reappointments, additional privileges, advancements, and voluntary
resignations as recommend by the Medical Staff Executive Committee and by the Health Services Director. (No fiscal impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 22 DECLARE a vacancy in the District 3 seat on the Arts and Culture Commission for a term ending June 30, 2023, as
recommended by Supervisor Burgis.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Personnel Actions
C. 23 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25701 to reclassify two Disability Benefits Coordinator (represented)
positions, one position vacant, and the second position and its incumbent to Departmental Human Resources Analyst II
(unrepresented) and reallocate on the salary schedule in the Health Services Department. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 24 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25815 to reassign one Supervising Accountant position and its incumbent
from General Accounting to Public Health Administration; and reassign one vacant Health Services Accountant position from
the Public Health Administration to General Accounting in the Finance division of the Health Services Department. (100%
Hospital Enterprise Fund I)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 25 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25808 to add one Probation Supervisor I (represented) position and three
Deputy Probation Officer III (represented) positions in the Probation Department. (100% State)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 26 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25813 to add one Board of Supervisors-Assistant Specialist (unrepresented)
position, effective October 13, 2021, and delete one Board of Supervisors-Assistant Specialist Position, effective January 1,
2022, in the District I Office of the Board of Supervisors. (100% General Fund)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Grants & Contracts
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreements between the County and the following agencies for receipt of fund
and/or services:
C. 27 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept a grant award in the amount of
$3,355,250 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration for
American Rescue Plan Act Funding for Health Centers to support COVID-19 efforts for homeless patients at the East County
shelter for the period April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023. (Federal, no County match)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 28 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to submit a final application and
accept grant funding in an amount not to exceed $500,000 from the United States Economic Development Administration
under the American Rescue Plan Act Build Back Better Regional Challenge to implement elements of the Northern Waterfront
Strategic Action Plan to assist with economic recovery from COVID-19 business impacts. (100% General Fund, No County
match)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 29 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with the City and County of San
C. 29 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with the City and County of San
Francisco in an amount not to exceed $744,412 as part of the 2020 U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Urban Area
Security Initiative (UASI) Grant for homeland security related projects within the County for the period November 1, 2020
through the end of the grant funding. (100% Federal)
Speaker: Addie.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 30 ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/329 authorizing the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to apply for and
execute a contract to accept State of California Emergency Solutions Grant funds in an amount not to exceed $615,970 for
eligible activities to assist homeless individuals and families with services to regain permanent housing, as recommended by
the Conservation and Development Department Director. (General Fund, no County match; 100% Federal)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 31 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Librarian, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant in the amount of
$149,750 from the Bella Vista Foundation to provide resources towards an Early Literacy Outreach program for the period
November 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024. (Library Fund, no County match)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreement between the County and the following parties as noted for the purchase
of equipment and/or services:
C. 33 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute an agreement with the California
Department of Food and Agriculture to reimburse the County an amount not to exceed $35,244 to provide Light Brown Apple
Moth quarantine response and regulatory enforcement activities for the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022 (100%
State).
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 34 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Defender, or designee, to execute a purchase order with Dell Technologies in an
amount not to exceed $216,461 for the purchase and maintenance of two (2) servers (100% General Fund).
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 35 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Agfa Healthcare
Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $4,282,363 to provide a Radiology Picture Archiving and Communications System to
the Health Services Department for the period October 5, 2021 through October 4, 2026. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)
(continued from October 5, 2021)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 36 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with 3M Health
Information Systems, Inc, in an amount not to exceed $296,277 for a hosted patient classification and claims software system
and support services for the period from October 5, 2021 through October 4, 2024. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)
(continued from October 5, 2021)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 37 AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to advertise for bids for the 2021 On-Call Pump Repair Services
Contract(s) for pump repair and replacement services at various County facilities, Countywide. (100% General Fund)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 38 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Macey Rosenthal,
M.D., in an amount not to exceed $209,664 to provide outpatient psychiatric care to patients in Central Contra Costa County
for the period November 1, 2021 through October 31, 2022. (100% Mental Health Realignment)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 39 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Oxygen Plus, in an
amount not to exceed $225,000 to provide durable medical equipment services to Contra Costa Health Plan members and
County recipients for the period November 1, 2021 through October 31, 2024. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise
Fund II)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 40 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Bay Area Community
Services, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $318,751 to operate COVID-19 housing in Richmond for homeless individuals in
Contra Costa County for the period October 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021. (100% Federal Emergency Management
Agency)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 41 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Matrix HG,
Inc., effective August 1, 2021, to increase the payment limit by $3,000,000 to a new payment limit of $5,000,000 to provide
on-call plumbing maintenance and repair services at various County facilities, with no change to the term of February 1, 2020
through January 31, 2023, Countywide. (100% General Fund)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 42 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Inview Imaging
Diagnostics, Inc., A Professional Medical Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $4,500,000 to provide diagnostic imaging
services to Contra Costa Health Plan members and County recipients for the period November 1, 2021 through October 31,
2024. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 43 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with North Coast Medical
Supply, LLC (dba Advanced Diabetes Supply), in an amount not to exceed $300,000 to provide durable medical equipment
services to Contra Costa Health Plan members and County recipients for the period November 1, 2021 through October 31,
2024. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 44 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Department, a purchase
order amendment with ASD Healthcare, to increase the payment limit by $500,000 for a new payment limit of $795,000 for the
purchase of Remdesivir for COVID-19 patients at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center with no change in the term of
January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021. (100% American Rescue Plan)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 45 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Department, a purchase
order with Fisher Scientific, LLC, in the amount not to exceed $1,900,000 for the purchase of reagents and supplies for the
clinical laboratories at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center for the period May 1, 2021 through April 30, 2026. (100%
Hospital Enterprise Fund I)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 46 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Defender, or designee, to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with
National Legal Aid & Defender Association (NLADA) to define the responsibilities of NLADA, as the Project Sponsor, and
the Public Defenders Office, as the Project Host Site, including a cost share payment not to exceed $5,000 for one (1)
AmeriCorps VISTA member who will provide performance measurement and data analysis services for the period of October
1, 2021 through December 1, 2022 (100% General Fund).
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 47 Acting as the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the
C. 47 Acting as the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the
Auditor-Controller, on behalf of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, to make a payment to the State of California
Department of Health Care Services in an amount not to exceed $1,232,363 for the Ground Emergency Medical Transportation
Quality Assurance Fee for ambulance transports provided by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District in the months of
January through June (Quarters 1-2) of 2021. (100% CCCFPD EMS Transport Fund)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 32 Acting as the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the
Fire Chief, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with FireStats, LLC, to increase the payment limit from $90,000 to
$151,200, and to extend the term from October 8, 2021 to September 30, 2024. (100% CCCFPD Operating Fund)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
Other Actions
C. 48 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE County Counsel, or designee, to consent to waive potential or actual conflicts of interest
that arise from Foley & Lardner LLP providing legal services to the West Contra Costa Healthcare District in connection with
a proposed refunding of the District’s Series 2018 and Series 2019 bonds. (No fiscal impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 49 ACCEPT and APPROVE the 2021-22 Employment and Human Services Department Community Services Bureau
Planning Calendar.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 50 ACCEPT the Contra Costa County Public Law Library Board of Trustees' July 2020 - June 2021 Annual Report, as
recommended by the County Administrator.
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 51 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Unitek College, to
provide supervised field instruction at Contra Costa Behavioral Health program sites to medical office administration students
for the period October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2024. (No fiscal impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
C. 52 APPROVE the list of providers recommended by Contra Costa Health Plan's Peer Review and Credentialing Committee
and the Health Services Director, and as required by the State Departments of Health Care Services and Managed Health Care,
and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. (No fiscal impact)
AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis,
District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover
GENERAL INFORMATION
The Board meets in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402, including as the Housing Authority and the Successor
Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. Persons who wish to address the Board should complete the form provided for that purpose and furnish a
copy of any written statement to the Clerk.
Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the Clerk of the Board to a
majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors less than 96 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 1025 Escobar
Street, First Floor, Martinez, CA 94553, during normal business hours.
All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Board to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no
separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Board or a member of the public prior to the time the Board votes on the
motion to adopt.
Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Chair calls for comments from those persons who
are in support thereof or in opposition thereto. After persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and the matter is subject to discussion and action
by the Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the Board of Supervisors can be submitted to the
office of the Clerk of the Board via mail: Board of Supervisors, 1025 Escobar Street, First Floor, Martinez, CA 94553 or to
clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us.
The County will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Board meetings who contact the Clerk of
the Board at least 24 hours before the meeting, at (925) 655-2000. An assistive listening device is available from the Clerk, First Floor.
Copies of recordings of all or portions of a Board meeting may be purchased from the Clerk of the Board. Please telephone the Office of the
Clerk of the Board, (925) 655-2000, to make the necessary arrangements.
Forms are available to anyone desiring to submit an inspirational thought nomination for inclusion on the Board Agenda. Forms may be obtained
at the Office of the County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, California.
Subscribe to receive to the weekly Board Agenda by calling the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 655-2000 or using the County's on line
subscription feature at the County’s Internet Web Page, where agendas and supporting information may also be viewed:
www.contracosta.ca.gov
STANDING COMMITTEES
The Airport Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets quarterly on the second Wednesday of the month at 11:00 a.m.
at the Director of Airports Office, 550 Sally Ride Drive, Concord.
The Family and Human Services Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Candace Andersen) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at
9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Finance Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the first Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110,
County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets quarterly on the first Monday of the month
at 10:30 a.m.. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 10:30
a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Room
110, County Administration Building, 1025 Street, Martinez.
The Public Protection Committee (Supervisors Andersen and Federal D. Glover) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in
Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Sustainability Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets on the fourth Monday of every other month at 1:00 p.m.
in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the second Monday
of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 110, County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez.
Airports Committee December 8, 2021 11:00 a.m.See above
Family & Human Services Committee October 25, 2021 9:00 a.m.See above
Finance Committee November 1, 2021 9:00 a.m.See above
Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee December 6, 2021 10:30 a.m.See above
Internal Operations Committee November 8, 2021 10:30 a.m.See above
Legislation Committee November 8, 2021 1:00 p.m.See above
Public Protection Committee October 25, 2021 10:30 a.m.See above
Sustainability Committee November 22, 2021 1:00 p.m.See above
Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee November 8, 2021 9:00 a.m.See above
AGENDA DEADLINE: Thursday, 12 noon, 12 days before the Tuesday Board meetings.
Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order):
Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its Board of Supervisors
meetings and written materials. Following is a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral presentations and written materials
associated with Board meetings:
AB Assembly Bill
ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments
ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees
AICP American Institute of Certified Planners
AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
ALUC Airport Land Use Commission
AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs
ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009
BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District
BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District
BayRICS Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications System
BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission
BGO Better Government Ordinance
BOS Board of Supervisors
CALTRANS California Department of Transportation
CalWIN California Works Information Network
CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids
CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response
CAO County Administrative Officer or Office
CCCPFD (ConFire) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District
CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan
CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority
CCRMC Contra Costa Regional Medical Center
CCWD Contra Costa Water District
CDBG Community Development Block Grant
CFDA Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
CEQA California Environmental Quality Act
CIO Chief Information Officer
COLA Cost of living adjustment
ConFire (CCCFPD) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District
CPA Certified Public Accountant
CPI Consumer Price Index
CSA County Service Area
CSAC California State Association of Counties
CTC California Transportation Commission
dba doing business as
DSRIP Delivery System Reform Incentive Program
EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District
ECCFPD East Contra Costa Fire Protection District
EIR Environmental Impact Report
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee
EMS Emergency Medical Services
EPSDT Early State Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Mental Health)
et al. et alii (and others)
FAA Federal Aviation Administration
FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency
F&HS Family and Human Services Committee
First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10)
FTE Full Time Equivalent
FY Fiscal Year
GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District
GIS Geographic Information System
HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development
HHS (State Dept of ) Health and Human Services
HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome
HOV High Occupancy Vehicle
HR Human Resources
HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
IHSS In-Home Supportive Services
Inc. Incorporated
IOC Internal Operations Committee
ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance
JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement
Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area
LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission
LLC Limited Liability Company
LLP Limited Liability Partnership
Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1
LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse
MAC Municipal Advisory Council
MBE Minority Business Enterprise
M.D. Medical Doctor
M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist
MIS Management Information System
MOE Maintenance of Effort
MOU Memorandum of Understanding
MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission
NACo National Association of Counties
NEPA National Environmental Policy Act
OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology
O.D. Doctor of Optometry
OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center
OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PARS Public Agencies Retirement Services
PEPRA Public Employees Pension Reform Act
Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology
RDA Redevelopment Agency
RFI Request For Information
RFP Request For Proposal
RFQ Request For Qualifications
RN Registered Nurse
SB Senate Bill
SBE Small Business Enterprise
SEIU Service Employees International Union
SUASI Super Urban Area Security Initiative
SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee
TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central)
TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County)
TRE or TTE Trustee
TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee
UASI Urban Area Security Initiative
VA Department of Veterans Affairs
vs. versus (against)
WAN Wide Area Network
WBE Women Business Enterprise
WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee
RECOMMENDATION(S):
DECLARE COVID-19 misinformation as a public health crisis.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
BACKGROUND:
See attached resolution and additional background in Item C.14 on today's agenda.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact:
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
D.1
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Supervisors John Gioia and Karen Mitchoff
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:DECLARING COVID-19 MISINFORMATION AS A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Melanie Cardell, Contra Costa; Susan Griffith; Michelle Baca, Discovery Bay; Laquetta Franz,
Antioch; Eva, Oakley; No name given; Kathy Garrett; Lacey Bustos, Oakley; John B., Danville; Ashley;
Carolyn Stein; David Walnut creek; Cassie, Bay Point; Jeanette; No name given; Susan Rock; Randy,
Contra Costa; No name given; No name given; Mary, Pleasant Hill; Resident of Contra Costa; Angelica
Moffitt; Linda, Discovery Bay; Alex, Discovery Bay; Jean Swash; Liz Richie; Joseph Grives,
Alameda-Contra Costa Medical Association; Brock Lynborn; Lindsey; Brian; Jason, Hercules; Julie
freestone; Mike McDermott; Nocole; Leah Russen, Director Vaccinate California; Pete Keaty, San
Ramon; Lee, Contra Costa; Diana Hoenig, Multi-Faith Action Coalition; Danny; Sonny; David Rugley;
Mary Schreiber; Kinberly Madison; Cheryl Sudduth; Addie; Jean Fulme, Lafayette; Elsa Stephens,
Richmond; J.S.; C. Melenna; Marilyn; User 2; Larry Best; Tyler; Dee; Carol; Karen Hernandez;
Emma; Teens; David Jones; Kasimir Carbo, Fire Protection District; Leslie.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2021/337
In the matter of:Resolution No. 2021/337
Declaring COVID-19 Misinformation as a Public Health Crisis
WHEREAS, Health misinformation has significantly undermined public health efforts
and the unmitigated proliferation of health misinformation has created a culture of
mistrust and has prolonged the COVID-19 pandemic, endangering the health and
safety of all Contra Costa County residents and visitors; and
WHEREAS, The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in over 95,000
cases and 921 deaths in Contra Costa County as of September 25, 2021; and
WHEREAS, The spread of COVID-19 has had a devastating impact on our health and
safety, our regional economy, our elder residents, our communities of color, our
mental health, the educational development of our children and every aspect of our
lives; and
WHEREAS, In Contra Costa County, there are significantly lower vaccination rates
for residents 20-29 years old, residents who identify themselves as White, Latinx,
African-American, and more than one race/ethnicity, men, and in certain
communities across the county and particularly in East and West County; and
WHEREAS, The COVID-19 vaccines have met the Food and Drug Administration’s
(FDA) rigorous scientific standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing
quality and have been proven to be safe and effective; and
WHEREAS, The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, brand name Comirnaty, has received full
FDA approval and been proven to be highly effective in preventing serious disease,
hospitalization and death from COVID-19 and that its benefits outweigh its risks; and
WHEREAS, The COVID-19 vaccine is available to everyone in Contra Costa County
at no cost, regardless of income, residency within the county, health coverage or
immigration status, and is administered by health professionals, like nurses and
doctors; and
WHEREAS, misinformation has caused confusion and has led to eligible people
declining COVID-19 vaccines, rejecting public health measures such as face
coverings and physical distancing, and using unproven treatments; and
WHEREAS, On July 15, 2021, the United States Surgeon General issued his first
advisory describing the “urgent threat” posed by the rise of false information of
COVID-19 – one that continues to put “lives at risk” and prolong the pandemic; and
WHEREAS, Recent surges in infections and hospitalizations from COVID-19 in
Contra Costa have highlighted the importance of clear and unequivocal
communications from public officials that vaccines are the best protection against
severe illness and hospitalizations; and
WHEREAS, Urgent action is needed to curb the spread of COVID-19 by combating
misinformation, thereby supporting our healthcare system and saving lives; and
WHEREAS, There would be substantial detriment on Contra Costa County and its
residents and visitors if not acted upon immediately; and
WHEREAS, Trusted community members, such as health professionals, faith leaders,
educators, and leaders of Black, Indigenous, Latinx and other communities of color
nationwide and in Contra Costa have spoken directly to their communities to address
COVID-19 related questions by town halls, meetings, social media, and traditional
media; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Supervisors and the County of Contra Costa is troubled by
and actively discourages the spread of COVID-19 misinformation as it is a dangerous
threat to public health; and
WHEREAS, Contra Costa Health Services continues to carry out its mission to care
for and protect all Contra Costa County residents from COVID-19, especially our
most vulnerable; and
WHEREAS, Contra Costa Health Services engages with our communities through
building partnerships and trust with community organizations and residents, trusted
messengers, and COVID-19 Ambassadors; and
WHEREAS, Contra Costa Health Services maintains a coronavirus website as a
source of credible, up-to-date information regarding COVID-19 for Contra Costa
residents at cchealth.org.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County declares
that COVID-19 health misinformation is an urgent public health crisis affecting our entire community and
the County of Contra Costa commits to combating health misinformation and curbing the spread of
falsehoods that threaten the health and safety of our residents; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the
Board of Supervisors and the County of Contra Costa will develop and support policies and strategies that
protect the health and safety of Contra Costa County residents through the promotion of evidence-based
interventions, including face coverings and vaccination; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Contra
Costa Health Services will continue to share facts and scientific information about COVID-19, to correct
misinformation including vaccine myths, to identify and give a platform to culturally relevant medical
experts and trusted messengers, to respond to questions and requests for information on social media, and to
work with our media and community partners to reach a broad audience with factual, timely information.
___________________
DIANE BURGIS
Chair, District III Supervisor
______________________________________
JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN
District I Supervisor District II Supervisor
______________________________________
KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER
District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an
action taken
and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on
the date
shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator
By: ____________________________________, Deputy
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT update on COVID 19 and PROVIDE direction to staff. (Dr. Ori Tzvieli and Erika Jenssen,
Deputy Director)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Administrative Reports with no specific fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
The Health Services Department has established a website dedicated to COVID-19, including daily
updates. The site is located at: https://www.coronavirus.cchealth.org/
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF
SUPERVISORS
Contact: Monica Nino
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of
Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc:
D.2
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Update on COVID -19
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Nicole Fox; Liz Ritchie; Jackie; Mike McDermott.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
OPEN the public hearing to consider adopting Ordinance No. 2021-33, to adjust transportation mitigation
fees and update the project list for the Central County Area of Benefit (AOB), re-establish the boundaries of
that area of benefit, abolish the South Walnut Creek area of benefit; and to consider determining the
existing South Walnut Creek area of benefit fund balance will be reallocated to projects that will serve
developments that paid those funds; RECEIVE public comments; CONSIDER all objections and protests
received by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors; and CLOSE the public hearing.
DETERMINE that the County did not receive protests from owners of more than one half of the area of the
property within the proposed boundaries of the Central County AOB, and therefore a majority protest does
not exist.
ADOPT Ordinance No. 2021-33 to update the project list and adjust the transportation mitigation fees
within the Central County AOB, to reestablish the boundaries of the Central County AOB, and to abolish
the South Walnut Creek AOB.
ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/318, to adopt the April 2021 Development Program Report and March 2021
Nexus Study attached thereto.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Jerry Fahy,
925.313.2276
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
D.3
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:HEARING to adopt Ordinance No. 2021-33 & Resolution No. 2021/318 for Central County AOB and abolish the
South Walnut Creek AOB, Central County area.
RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D)
DETERMINE that the adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-33 and Resolution No. 2021/318 are exempt
from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article
5, Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
DIRECT the Conservation and Development Director to file a Notice of Exemption with the County
Clerk-Recorder; and DIRECT the Public Works Director to arrange for payment of the $25.00 handling
fee to the County Clerk-Recorder for the filing of the Notice of Exemption.
DIRECT the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to record certified copies of Ordinance No. 2021-33 and
Resolution No. 2021/318 in the Official Records of the Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder.
DIRECT that, on January 1, 2023, and on each January 1 thereafter that the Ordinance No. 2021-33
remains in effect, the Public Works Director adjust the Central County AOB transportation mitigation
fees for the effects of inflation or deflation, in accordance with Section 5(a)(3) of the ordinance.
REDESIGNATE Trust Fund No. 1242 as the fund into which all Central County AOB transportation
mitigation fee revenue will be deposited; DIRECT all Central County AOB transportation mitigation fee
revenue to be deposited into that fund; and DIRECT the County Treasurer-Tax Collector to invest all
monies in that fund, with interest to accrue and remain in the fund.
DIRECT that all funds deposited in Trust Fund No. 1242 must be used solely to pay new development’s
proportional share of the actual or estimated costs of constructing the transportation improvements
specified in the Development Program Report and Nexus Study attached hereto, and to reimburse the
County for payment of any such costs with money advanced by the County from its general fund, or
from other County revenues.
DIRECT the Public Works Director to transfer all assets and liabilities of the trust fund for South
Walnut Creek Area of Benefit (Trust Fund No. 1243) to Trust Fund No. 1242 and close Trust Fund No.
1243.
DETERMINE that, pursuant to Government Code section 66001(f), the administrative costs of
refunding approximately $133,000 in unexpended Trust Fund No. 1243 assets will exceed any amount to
be refunded.
DETERMINE that all unexpended Trust Fund No. 1243 assets shall be used only on the Olympic
Boulevard projects (Projects SWC2, SWC7, and SWC9), which will serve development projects that
paid South Walnut Creek Area of Benefit fees.
AUTHORIZE the Public Works Department to collect an additional administrative fee equal to two
percent (2%) of the applicable Central County AOB Fee.
DIRECT the Conservation and Development Director to monitor future amendments to the currently
adopted General Plan and their impact on traffic within the Central County AOB and to report those
amendments to the Public Works Director as necessary to facilitate updating of the Central County AOB
Fee.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-33 will result in the collection of transportation mitigation fees from
Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-33 will result in the collection of transportation mitigation fees from
new development in amounts calculated to reflect new development’s proportional share of the actual or
estimated costs of transportation improvements that are necessary to mitigate transportation impacts
within the Central County AOB, as specified in the Development Program Report and the Nexus Study.
BACKGROUND:
A. INTRODUCTION: One of the objectives of the County General Plan is to connect new
development directly to the provision of community facilities necessary to serve that development. In
other words, development cannot be allowed to occur unless a mechanism is in place to provide the
funding for the infrastructure necessary to serve that development. Imposing transportation mitigation
fees on new development is a means of raising revenue to construct road improvements to serve new
developments. Requiring that all new development pay a transportation mitigation fee ensures that new
development pays its proportional share of the transportation improvements that need to be constructed
to alleviate traffic impacts attributable to that development.
B. HISTORY AND PURPOSE OF CENTRAL COUNTY AOB: On March 15, 1988, the
Board adopted Resolution No. 88/122 and Ordinance 88-27, which created the Countywide Area of
Benefit that consisted of seven regions, one being the Central County region. At the time the Central
County Area of Benefit was divided into four subareas: Briones, Martinez, Central County, and South
Walnut Creek. Over the next ten years after the initial resolution, Areas of Benefit were developed for
each of these subregions forming separate AOBs, on December 6, 1994, and June 13, 1995, for the
South Walnut Creek and Central County AOBs, respectively. As the South Walnut Creek AOB has
limited development potential remaining, staff recommends that the South Walnut Creek AOB is
merged into the Central County AOB to create a single AOB to maintain flexibility on how to respond to
the transportation mitigation needs for new development and decrease administration costs. The Central
County Nexus Study reflects a combination of boundary areas and combined list of projects to make
Central County and South Walnut Creek one combined AOB funding program.
C. PROPOSED CHANGES TO FEE PROGRAM: In recent years, the development potential
and traffic circulation needs have changed within the Central County AOB. These changes, along with
population growth and new estimated potential growth, have prompted an update to the Central County
AOB program, resulting in an amended project list, and some administrative modifications, as discussed
below.
1. New Project List: County staff and consultants have identified transportation projects that are
needed to serve development within the Central County AOB through 2040. These projects have
been included on a new project list, attached as Exhibit C to the April 2021 Development Program
Report (“2021 Development Program Report”). This list contains 28 projects, of which 4 are
carry-over projects from the 1994/1995 AOB Project List.
The total estimated cost of the updated list of projects is $71,494,000, of which $5,865,871 is
attributable to new development within the Central County AOB. Detailed estimates of the cost of
each of the projects on the project list are included in the March 2021 Nexus Study, Central
County Area of Benefit (the “Nexus Study”), attached as Exhibit D to the 2021 Development
Program Report. The cost of the projects attributable to new development will be paid with
revenue from transportation mitigation fees imposed on new development within the Central
County AOB. The remaining cost of the projects, attributable to existing development, will be paid
from other revenue sources, including but not limited to State or Federal Highway Safety
Improvement grant funds, Local Measure J funds, gas tax revenue, and various other grant
programs that may become available in the future.
2. Revised Fee Rates: Based on the analysis in the Nexus Study, transportation mitigation fees
2. Revised Fee Rates: Based on the analysis in the Nexus Study, transportation mitigation fees
were calculated to charge new development for its proportional share of the cost of the projects on
the project list in the 2021 Development Program Report. The maximum transportation mitigation
fee rates supported by the Nexus Study are set forth in Table 1, below, along with the
recommended rates to be adopted by Ordinance 2021-33. The proposed fee rates are the maximum
allowable rates supported by the Nexus Study. However, the recommended fee rates represent a
decrease from the rates currently in effect. On January 1, 2023, and on each January 1st thereafter,
each of the fees in Table 1 will automatically increase or decrease by a percentage equal to the
percentage change, if any, in the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index for the San
Francisco Bay Area for the 12-month period ending September 30 of the prior year.
Table 1: Central County AOB Fee Rates
Note: du = dwelling unit; sf = square foot; due = dwelling unit equivalent
The total fees required to be paid by a new development project applicant will be calculated based
on the number of dwelling units (residential), square feet (commercial, office, industrial), or
dwelling-unit-equivalents (other) attributable to that development multiplied by the applicable fee
rate in Table 1. The fee for the expansion of an existing development will be calculated by
determining the number of dwelling units, square feet, or dwelling-unit-equivalents attributable
only to the expansion.
The fees to be paid by each new development will be collected at the time a building permit is
issued for the development, in accordance with Ordinance Code Chapter 913-4. Fee revenue will
be deposited in the fund for the Central County AOB – Trust Fund No. 1242 – and used only for
the transportation improvements identified in the 2021 Development Program Report.
3. Use of Existing Fee Revenues: The existing Central County AOB fund includes a fund
balance of approximately $5.8 million. There are four carryover projects from the existing Central
County AOB project list that have not been completed and that remain on the new Central County
AOB project list. Those carryover projects are: Rudgear Road (SM1), Walnut Boulevard (SM2),
Mountain View Boulevard (SM3), and San Miguel Drive (SM4). (See Nexus Study, p. 32.)
Existing Central County AOB funds will remain on deposit and used for the SM1, SM2, SM3, and
SM4 projects when sufficient funding is available to deliver those projects. The County has not
collected sufficient funds from other sources to pay for the portion of the project costs attributable
to existing development.
There are no carryover projects from the South Walnut Creek AOB project list. All projects in that
Land Use Category
Fee Rates to be
Adopted per Nexus
Study
Single-Family $5,335 / du
Multi-Family $3,275 / du
Commercial/Retail $7.57 / sf
Office $6.12 / sf
Industrial $4.86 / sf
Other $5,335 / du
There are no carryover projects from the South Walnut Creek AOB project list. All projects in that
AOB were completed when the Olympic Boulevard Widening was completed. The ordinance will
abolish the South Walnut Creek AOB and include the area previously covered by that AOB within
the Central County AOB. The South Walnut Creek AOB fund has a fund balance of approximately
$133,000.
South Walnut Creek AOB fees have been paid by thousands of parties over nearly twenty years.
The administrative cost of trying to identify parties entitled to a refund, calculate pro-rata refunds,
and refund the existing funds would be administratively burdensome, and the staff time to
undertake that effort is expected to exceed the amount that would be refunded. Therefore, in
accordance with the requirements of Government Code section 66001(f), staff recommends that
funds remaining in the South Walnut Creek AOB be transferred to the Central County AOB fund
and used for the Olympic Boulevard projects, Projects SWC2, SWC7, AND SWC9. Those
projects will serve the development projects that paid South Walnut Creek AOB fees.
D. RESOLUTION NO. 2021/318: Pursuant to Government Code sections 66484 subdivision
(a)(3), and 66484.7, subdivision (a)(3), a resolution must be adopted by the Board that incorporates a
description of the boundaries of the area of benefit, the costs, whether actual or estimated, and the
method of fee apportionment established at the hearing.
The 2021 Development Program Report sets forth the boundaries of the Central County AOB, the list of
projects and their estimated costs, the method of fee apportionment, and nexus findings. Approval of
Resolution No. 2021/318 is required to comply with the above legal requirements by adopting and
incorporating the facts and findings contained in the 2021 Development Program Report, and the Nexus
Study attached to the report.
E. ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33: To adjust the Central County AOB fees to generate revenue to
fund the transportation improvements described herein, an ordinance must be adopted that includes the
“nexus” findings required by Government Code section 66001. The ordinance also must include the
specific information required by Government Code section 66484. Ordinance No. 2021-33 includes the
information and findings required by those statutes.
Adoption of Ordinance No. 2021-33 will repeal Ordinance No. 95-32 and impose new transportation
mitigation fees on new development within the Central County AOB. The ordinance includes provisions
for fee reductions for affordable and inclusionary housing, senior housing, and congregate care facilities.
Revenue from the fees will fund the transportation projects necessary to serve transportation demands
within the Central County AOB through 2040. Staff recommends that the Board adopt Ordinance No.
2021-33.
Notice of this hearing was given in accordance with Government Code sections 6061, 65091, 54986,
66484, and Ordinance Code Section 913-6.014.
F. ADMINISTRATIVE FEE: In addition to the transportation mitigation fee imposed on a new
development project, the County will assess an administrative fee equal to 2% of that transportation
mitigation fee. This additional fee will be used to cover staff time for fee collection, accounting,
technical support to the community groups, traffic advisory committees and other administrative tasks.
G. CEQA FINDINGS: These actions are covered by the general rule that the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) applies only to activities that have the potential to cause a
significant effect on the environment. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the
activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The implementation and
activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. The implementation and
imposition of fees has no associated environmental impacts. Therefore, this activity is exempt from the
requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. The future
implementation of the transportation improvement projects to be funded with transportation mitigation
fee revenue, however, may have associated project-specific impacts, and such impacts will be evaluated
under CEQA as each project is planned and implemented.
For the reasons specified above, Public Works Department staff recommends that the Board take each of
the recommended actions listed in this board order, to adjust the transportation mitigation fees that are
imposed on new development within the Central County AOB.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Failure to adopt Ordinance No. 2021-33 to adjust fees in the Central County Area of Benefit, reestablish
the boundaries, and update the proposed project list of the area of benefit will result in new development
not paying its proportional share of the transportation improvements needed to serve development within
the AOB through 2040, and projects needed to satisfy transportation demands within the AOB cannot be
funded under the existing AOB program.
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
On the date of publication of the agenda, a technical glitch prevented the Resolution No. 2021/318
from inclusion. By unanimous vote, with all Supervisors present, the Better Government
Ordinance 96 hour notification is waived and the resolution is accepted into the meeting materials
for consideration.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2021/318
Development Program Report
Nexus Study
Ordinance 2021-33
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Sigend Resolution No. 2021/318
Signed Ordinance 2021-33
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 10/12/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/318
IN THE MATTER OF the adoption of Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 2021-33, adjusting the fees for the Central County
Area of Benefit.
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors conducted a public hearing on October 12, 2021, to consider the adoption of Contra Costa
County Ordinance No. 2021-33, to adjust transportation mitigation fees and update the project list for the Central County Area of
Benefit; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors at said hearing reestablished the boundaries of the Central County Area of Benefit, the
costs of the proposed improvements, and the method of fee apportionment, as set forth in the April 2021, Development Program
Report for the Central County Area of Benefit (“Development Program Report”), attached hereto as Exhibit 1; and
WHEREAS, Government Code sections 66484 and 66484.7 require a resolution incorporating a description of the area of benefit
boundaries, costs, and method of fee apportionment to be recorded by the governing body conducting the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the April 2021, “Nexus Study, Central County Area of Benefit” (“Nexus Study”), which is attached as Exhibit D to
the Development Program Report, sets forth the nexus findings required by the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code. § 66000 et seq.);
NOW THEREFORE, it is resolved that the Board of Supervisors hereby: 1. ADOPTS the Development Program Report attached
hereto as Exhibit 1, including the Nexus Study attached as Exhibit D to the Development Program Report.
2. INCORPORATES herein by reference the following, which were established at the hearing described above:
The boundaries of the Central County Area of Benefit, as more particularly described in the legal description attached as
Exhibit A to the Development Program Report, and as depicted in the map attached as Exhibit B to the Development
Program Report.
A.
The estimated costs of the intersection and pedestrian improvements to be funded with revenue from the Central County
Area of Benefit fees, as more particularly set forth in Exhibit C to the Development Program Report; and
B.
The method of apportionment of the Central County Area of Benefit fees, as more particularly described in the
Development Program Report, and in the Nexus Study attached as Exhibit D to the Development Program Report.
C.
Contact: Jerry Fahy, 925.313.2276
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
"Accredited by the American Public Works Association"
255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553-4825
TEL: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333
www.cccpublicworks.org
Brian M. Balbas, Director
Deputy Directors
Stephen Kowalewski, Chief
Allison Knapp
Warren Lai
Carrie Ricci
Joe Yee
ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ON ___________________
Development Program Report
for the
Central County Area of Benefit
April 2021
Prepared Pursuant to Section 913 of the County Ordinance Code
Prepared by and for:
Contra Costa County Public Works Department, Transportation Engineering Division and
Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ................................................................ 1
CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND ............................................................................................ 2
CHAPTER 3: LOCATION AND BOUNDARY ...................................................................... 2
CHAPTER 4: GENERAL PLAN RELATIONSHIP ................................................................ 3
CHAPTER 5: PROJECT LIST ............................................................................................ 4
CHAPTER 6: DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL ....................................................................... 8
CHAPTER 7: ESTIMATED COST OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS ........................................... 9
CHAPTER 8: METHOD OF FEE APPORTIONMENT ......................................................... 10
CHAPTER 9: FEE RATES ................................................................................................ 12
CALCULATION OF FEES ................................................................................................................................................................. 12
CHAPTER 10: PROGRAM FINANCE CONSIDERATIONS ............................................... 13
OTHER FUNDING SOURCES ........................................................................................................................................................... 13
REVIEW OF FEES .......................................................................................................................................................................... 13
COLLECTION OF FEES ................................................................................................................................................................... 13
INTEREST ON FEES ....................................................................................................................................................................... 14
DEDICATION IN LIEU OF FEE ......................................................................................................................................................... 14
List of Tables
TABLE 1. PROPOSED PROJECT LIST FOR CENTRAL COUNTY/SOUTH WALNUT CREEK
AOB PROGRAM ............................................................................................................... 5
TABLE 2. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL SUMMARY ........................................................... 8
TABLE 3. DWELLING UNIT EQUIVALENT (DUE) RATES ............................................... 10
TABLE 4: GROWTH IN DUES ........................................................................................ 11
TABLE 5: FEE CALCULATIONS ...................................................................................... 12
List of Exhibits
EXHIBIT A: AREA OF BENEFIT BOUNDARY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT B: AREA OF BENEFIT BOUNDARY MAP
EXHIBIT C: ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN – PROJECT LIST WITH ASSOCIATED COSTS
EXHIBIT D: NEXUS STUDY - CENTRAL COUNTY AREA OF BENEFIT
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
1 OF 14
Chapter 1: Introduction and Purpose
The Central County Area of Benefit (“Central County AOB”) was created as a means to collect
funds to maintain and improve roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities needed to accommodate
travel demand generated by new land development within Central County. This Development
Program Report (“DPR”) contains information and data in support of assessing development
projects within the Central County AOB as a means for development to pay its fair share towards
future infrastructure. The DPR is required by Chapter 913-6 of the County Ordinance Code and is
required by the Board of Supervisors’ Policy on Bridge Crossing and Major Thoroughfare Fees
(adopted July 17, 1979), which implements Division 913 of the County Ordinance Code and section
66484 of the State Subdivision Map Act.
One of the objectives of the County General Plan is to connect new development directly to the
provision of community facilities necessary to serve that development. In other words,
development cannot be allowed to occur unless a mechanism is in place to provide the funding for
the infrastructure necessary to serve that development. The Central County AOB Fee is a means
of raising revenue to construct road improvements to serve new developments. Requiring that all
new development pay a road improvement fee will help ensure that they participate in the cost of
improving the road system.
Each new development or expansion of an existing development will generate additional traffic.
Where the existing road system is inadequate to meet future needs of new development,
improvements are required to meet the new demand. The purpose of a development program is
to determine improvements ultimately required by future development and to require developers
to pay a fee to fund these improvements. Because the Central County AOB Fee is based on the
relative impact on the road system and the costs of the necessary improvements to mitigate this
impact, the fee amount is roughly proportional to the development impact. This report discusses
the basis of that fee amount.
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
2 OF 14
Chapter 2: Background
On March 15, 1988, the Board of Supervisors (“Board”) passed a resolution forming the
Countywide Area of Benefit (“Countywide AOB”) to improve the capacity and safety of the arterial
road network in the County through the establishment of a traffic mitigation fee ordinance
(Resolution 88/122 and Ordinance 88-27). This ordinance applied to unincorporated areas of the
County and outlined boundaries of seven regional areas of benefit, including the Central County
AOB, within the original Countywide AOB. The Central County AOB was last updated in 1995.
The Central County area has since experienced changes in the area's circulation needs and
development potential. The Nexus Study provides the technical basis for a comprehensive update
of the Central County AOB Program. The focus of the updated program is to support an overall
transportation system in the Central County AOB that serves the expected future demand based
on changes in regional and local land use projections, planned and approved development
projects, and associated changes to capital improvements and updated cost estimates.
The Nexus Study documents the analytical approach for determining the nexus between the fees,
the local impact created by anticipated development in the Central County AOB, and the
transportation improvements to be funded with fee revenues. A traffic and fair-share cost analysis
was conducted to equitably distribute the cost of the necessary improvements to developments
that cause the impacts, per the provisions of the Mitigation Fee Act. The most up-to-date analytical
tools and techniques, available at the time this study commenced, were used to ensure the highest
level of consistency with current standards.
Chapter 3: Location and Boundary
The Central County AOB boundary location is described in Exhibit A and generally shown in Exhibit
B.
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
3 OF 14
Chapter 4: General Plan Relationship
One of the objectives of the County General Plan is to relate new development directly to the
provision of community facilities necessary to serve that new development. Accordingly,
development cannot be allowed to occur unless a mechanism is in place to provide the funding for
the infrastructure necessary to serve that development. The Central County AOB Program is a fee
mechanism providing funds to construct transportation improvements to serve new residential,
commercial and industrial development. Requiring that all new development pay a transportation
improvement fee will help ensure that it participates fairly in the cost of improving the
transportation system. This Program applies only to new development within the unincorporated
portions of the Central County AOB.
The Central County AOB is consistent with the features of the County General Plan and its
amendments, and subscribes to the policies of the General Plan elements. The General Plan
policies include, but are not limited to, improving the County roadway network to meet existing
and future traffic demands. The Central County AOB Fee will assist in funding the necessary
roadway improvements required for future growth as shown in the General Plan.
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
4 OF 14
Chapter 5: Project List
The project list for the Central County AOB is set forth in Table 1 below. This list contains 28
projects, of which 4 are carry-over projects from the 1994/1995 AOB Project List. The projects
include pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements. The improvements not related to pedestrian
and bicyclist safety are focused on capacity and safety improvements.
The improvements included on the Central County AOB project list have been identified through a
Transportation Needs Analyses conducted by DKS Associates, in which existing and anticipated
future deficiencies were identified, including traffic congestion, roadway deficiencies, and safety
improvements based upon current conditions, as well as travel demand forecast for 2040
conditions.
The improvements proposed on the Central County AOB project list were refined through a
cooperative effort between the Public Works Department and community input through
workshops.
The proposed improvements will be reviewed periodically to assess the impacts of changing travel
patterns, the rate of development, and the accuracy of the estimated project costs. The periodic
review of the program will also allow staff to evaluate project priority and the need to increase
fees should project costs increase or exceed the rate of inflation.
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
5 OF 14
Table 1. Proposed Project List for Central County/South Walnut Creek AOB Program
Roadway Project Recommended Project Basis for Recommendation
Pleasant Hill Road WPH2 Bicycle Improvements Countywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan
Reliez Valley Road WPH3 Bicycle Improvements Countywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan
Taylor Boulevard WPH4 Safety Improvements Community Input
Fish Ranch Road NL1 Safety Improvements Contra Costa County
Standard Plans
San Pablo Dam Road NL2/3 Roadway Safety
Improvements
Contra Costa County
Standard Plans: CCTA’s
Comprehensive
Transportation Project List
Bear Creek Road at Happy
Valley Road NL5 Intersection Improvements Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards
Pinehurst Road SL1 Bicycle Improvements Countywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan
Ayers Road at Concord
Avenue EC2 Intersection Improvements Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards
Ayers Road at Laurel
Avenue EC3 Intersection Improvements Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards
Bailey Road at Myrtle
Drive EC4/6 Intersection Improvements.
Add Shoulder
Contra Costa County
Standard Plans: contra Costa
County General Plan LOS
Standards
Las Juntas Road at
Coggins Drive CCC1 Intersection Improvements Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
6 OF 14
Buskirk Avenue CCC2 Roadway Improvements Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards
Treat Boulevard CCC3/5 Complete Street
Improvements
Countywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan
Treat Boulevard CCC4 Complete Street
Improvements
Countywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan
Treat Boulevard at Jones
Road CCC6 Intersection Improvements Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards
Mayhew Way CCC8 Pedestrian Improvements Countywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan
Olympic Boulevard at
Boulevard Way/Tice
Valley Boulevard
SWC2 Intersection Improvements Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards
Olympic Boulevard at
Bridgefield Road SWC7 Intersection Improvements Community Input
Olympic Boulevard SWC9 Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvements
Olympic Corridor Trail
Connector Study
Dewing Lane SWC3 Connection of South Walnut
Creek to Iron Horse Trail Community Input
Tice Valley Boulevard SWC4 Complete Street
Improvements Community Input
Springbrook Road SWC6 Complete Street
Improvements Community Input
Boulevard Way SWC8 Sidewalk Project Community Input
Carry-Over Projects from 1994/1995 AOB Project List
Rudgear Road and San
Miguel Drive SM1 Intersection Safety
Improvements Carry-Over Project
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
7 OF 14
Walnut Boulevard SM2 Pedestrian Improvements Carry-Over Project
Mountain View Boulevard SM3 Pedestrian Improvements Carry-Over Project
San Miguel Drive SM4 Pedestrian Improvements Carry-Over Project
Source: DKS Associates, 2018
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
8 OF 14
Chapter 6: Development Potential
The “Nexus Study: Central County Area of Benefit” (“Nexus Study”), dated April 2021, was
prepared by DKS Associates in collaboration with Urban Economics for the Public Works
Department and is attached as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference. The Nexus Study
provides the technical basis for establishing the required nexus between the anticipated future
development within the Central County AOB boundary and the need for certain facilities.
The projected growth in households, employment, and vehicle-miles traveled within the Central
County AOB is discussed and shown in the Nexus Study.
A summary of the potential new residential dwelling units, office, industrial, and commercial/ retail
developments (net growth from 2010 to 2040) for the unincorporated portion of AOB is shown in
Table 2.
Table 2. Development Potential Summary
Land Use Category Units
Single-Family Residential 304 dwelling units
Multi-Family Residential 541 dwelling units
Office 184,000 sq ft
Industrial 146,000 sq ft
Commercial/Retail 84,000 sq ft
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
9 OF 14
Chapter 7: Estimated Cost of Road Improvements
The estimated cost of the road improvements planned for the Central County AOB is listed in
Exhibit C. The Central County AOB will only finance the proportional share of the improvements
necessitated by the impact on the road system from new development.
Detailed cost estimates for the projects included in the road improvement plan are provided in
Appendix C of the Nexus Study.
The County will assess an administrative fee equal to 2% of the applicable fee. This additional
fee will be used to cover staff time for fee collection, accounting, and technical support to the
community groups and traffic advisory committees.
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
10 OF 14
Chapter 8: Method of Fee Apportionment
The total estimated cost of the projects included in the Central County AOB project list is
$71,494,000. The cost to accommodate new development within the Central County AOB is
$5,865,871. There is an existing balance of $0.
An adjusted project cost to be covered by the Central County AOB fees was determined by
subtracting the existing fund balance from the attributable project cost.
$5,865,871 - 0 = $5,865,871
(Attributable Project Cost) (Balance) (Adjusted Project Cost)
This adjusted project cost represents the amount of revenue needed from the Central County
AOB Fee to fund growth’s share of the project cost as shown in Exhibit C.
The expected growth in the Central County AOB to the year 2040 is 304 single-family units, 541
multi-family units, 84,000 square feet of retail space, 184,000 square feet of office space, and
146,000 square feet of industrial space. To determine a fee rate per unit, first each development
type is assigned a dwelling unit equivalent or “DUE” rate. DUEs compare the trip making
characteristics of a land use in relation to a typical single-family residential unit, which is assigned
a DUE of 1. Land uses with lower overall traffic impacts than a single family home are assigned
values less than 1, and vice versa. The following Table shows the DUE rates for the various land
use categories.
Table 3. Dwelling Unit Equivalent (DUE) Rates
Dwelling Unit Equivalent (DUE) Rates
Land Use Category
PM Peak Hour Trip
Rate per
Unit1
Unit
Trip
Length
(miles)2
Percent
New
trips2
VMT
per
Unit
DUE
per
Unit
Singe Family 1.01 Dwelling
Unit
5.0 100 5.050 1.00
Multi-Family 0.62 5.0 100 3.100 0.61
Retail 4.10 Square
Feet
2.3 76 7.167 0.00142
Office 1.40 4.5 92 5.796 0.00115
Industrial 0.98 5.1 92 4.598 0.00091
1 ITE Trip Generation 7th Edition 2 ITE Journal, May 1992
Source: DKS Associates, 2018
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
11 OF 14
Table 4: Growth in DUEs
Growth in DUEs
Land Use Category Unit
Growth
in
Units1
DUE
per Unit
Growth
in
DUEs
Singe Family Dwelling
Unit
304 1.00 304
Multi-Family 541 0.61 332
Retail
Square
Feet
84,000 0.00142 119
Office 184,000 0.00115 211
Industrial 146,000 0.00091 133
Total 1,099
1 See Table 2: “Summary of Estimated Development 2010 to 2040 Growth”
Source: DKS Associates, 2016
The growth in DUEs for each land use and the total growth in DUEs is shown above in Table 4.
Because the DUE rates are based on estimates of the average vehicle -miles of travel generated
during the PM peak hours for each general land use type, the developments are charged fees in
proportion to the amount of traffic impact they are projected to generate. In this way, the fees
attributed to each new parcel will be proportional to the estimated benefits they receive through
use of the new improvements.
Finally, the Cost per DUE is found by dividing the total Cost of Improvements Allocated to AOB
Growth by the total Growth in Dwelling Unit Equivalents (DUE's):
$5,865,871
1099 =$5,335 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝐷𝑈𝐷
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
12 OF 14
Chapter 9: Fee Rates
Calculation of Fees
The fee calculation is set forth in detail in the Nexus Study.
To determine a maximum fee rate for each land use category, the Cost per DUE is multiplied by
the DUE per unit. In the residential categories, this results in a fee per dwelling unit. In the non-
residential categories, the fee is listed per square foot. These calculations are summarized in
Table 5 below.
Table 5: Fee Calculations
Nexus-Based Fee Rates for Central County AOB
Cost of Improvements Allocated to AOB
Growth in Dwelling Unit Equivalents
Cost per DUE
$5,865,871
1099
$5,335.39
Land Use Units DUE per Unit Maximum Fee per Unit1
Single Family
Multi-Family
Retail
Office
Industrial
Other
Dwelling Unit
Dwelling Unit
Square Foot
Square Foot
Square Foot
Dwelling Unit
Equivalent
1.00
0.61
0.00142
0.00115
0.00091
1.00
$5,335
$3,275
$7.57
$6.12
$4.86
$5,335
1 Maximum Fee per Unit = (Cost per DUE) x (DUE per Unit)
Source: DKS Associates, 2018
To determine the DUE for a development considered “Other,” the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) are
first estimated using a combination of trip generation data, the default rate for trip length, and
percent new trips.
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
13 OF 14
Chapter 10: Program Finance Considerations
Other Funding Sources
The improvements planned for the Central County AOB will be only partially funded by Central
County AOB fee revenues. Other sources of funding, such as State or Federal aid, or local sources
such as sales tax, gas tax, etc., will be pursued.
These other funding sources include, but are not limited to, Regional Measure J Funds, State
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Funds, and Federal Program Funds.
The rate at which revenue is generated by the Central County AOB Fee depends on the rate of
new development. This rate of revenue generation affects the timing of construction of the
improvement projects because it is dependent upon the total amount of fees collected , less
expenditures. Alternate sources of funding would permit construction of AOB projects sooner.
Review of Fees
Project cost estimates will be reviewed periodically while the Central County AOB is in effect. On
January 1 of each year thereafter, the amount of the fees will be increased or decreased based
on the percentage change in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for the San
Francisco Bay Area for the 12-month period ending with the September 30th index of the previous
calendar year, without further action of the Board of Supervisors.
Collection of Fees
Fees will be collected when a building permit is issued, in accordance with Section 913-4.204 of
Title 9 (Subdivisions) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. Fees collected will be deposited
into an interest bearing trust fund established pursuant to Section 913 -8.002 of the Contra Costa
County Ordinance Code.
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
14 OF 14
Interest on Fees
The interest accrued on the fees collected shall continue to accumulate in the trust account and
shall be expended for construction of the improvements, or to reimburse the County for the cost
of constructing the improvements, pursuant to Section 913-8.006 of the County Ordinance Code.
Dedication in Lieu of Fee
A development may be required to construct, or dedicate right-of-way for a portion of the
improvements as a condition of approval. In such an event, the developer may be eligible to
receive credit for the fee or reimbursement. The eligible credit and/or reimbursement shall be
determined in accordance with the County’s “Traffic Fee Credit and Reimbursement Policy.”
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit A: Area of Benefit Boundary Legal Description
A portion of Sections 23, 24, 25, 26, 35, and 36, Township 1 North, Range 3 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, in the
county of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot “E” of Subdivision 7252 filed September 15,1989 in Book 337 of Maps at
page 30; thence westerly along the northerly right of way line of State Highway 4, being also the south line of said
Lot “E” and the south line of Lot “J” of Subdivision 7106 filed June 21,1989 in Book 334 of Maps at page 39, north
89°12’29” west 4600.00 feet more or less to the east line of Lot 184 of Subdivision 6561 filed July 22, 1985 in Book
291 of Maps at page 39; thence continuing along said northerly right of way line, thru said Lot 184, westerly 312.22
feet to the southeast corner of Parcel “A” of Subdivision 6760 filed June 23, 1988 in Book 323 of Maps at page 9;
thence continuing along said right of way line, being also the southerly line of Parcels “A”, “AA” and “B” of said
Subdivision 6760, westerly 4352.86 feet to the southwest corner of said Parcel “B”; thence leaving said right of way
line and along the westerly line of said Subdivision, thence north 00°56’27” east 2520.11 feet; thence north
00°59’24” east 628.84 feet to the northwest corner of said Subdivision; thence along the westerly line of Subdivision
6979 filed March 6, 1989 in Book 331 of Maps at page 20, north 00°59’24” east 1100.80 feet; thence along the
westerly line of Subdivision 7140 filed April 8, 1996 in Book 385 of Maps at page 43, north 00°59’32” east 916.31
feet to the northwest corner of said Subdivision; thence along the north line of said Subdivision, north 89°08’08”
east 1388.74 feet to the northeast corner of said Subdivision; thence north 47°37’44” east 1249.47 feet along the
northwesterly line of Subdivision 6144 filed March 28, 1984 in Book 277 of Maps at page 42; thence north 47°37’44”
east 265.13 feet along the northwesterly line of Subdivision 4687 filed May 24, 1978 in Book 211 of Maps at page
5; thence northeasterly along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 660.00 feet through an angle of
14°02’20”, an arc distance of 161.71 feet to a point on the southern boundary of Subdivision 4206 filed July 6, 1972
in Book 148 of Maps at page 1; thence along said boundary, north 42°37’00” west 12.66 feet; thence north
47°23’00” east 123.10 feet; thence north 16°18’57” east 436.29 feet to the southeast corner of Subdivision 4205
filed June 22, 1972 in Book 147 of Maps at page 27; thence along the westerly lines of said Subdivision 4205 the
following six courses; thence north 16°18’57” east 52.94 feet; thence north 15°55’12” east 300.00 feet; thence
north 15°43’32” east 600.21 feet; thence north 14°59’17” east 344.51 feet; thence north 17°33’17” east 300.09
feet; thence north 16°03’32” east 220.63 feet to an angle point in Lot 18 of Subdivision 5811 filed August 18, 1980
in Book 236 of Maps at page 4, thence along the westerly boundary of said Subdivision 5811 the following nine
courses; north 16°03’32” east 139.38 feet; thence north 18°40’12”east 140.12 feet; thence north 08°17’27”east
106.18 feet; thence north 28°33’12” east 147.78 feet; thence north 30°02’22” east 130.07 feet; thence north
35°10’12” east 170.29 feet; thence north 33°30’07” east 312.11 feet; thence north 70°55’07” east 5.88 feet to the
northeast corner of Lot 1 of said Subdivision, also being the northwest corner of Lot 70 of “Amended Map”
Subdivision 4077 filed July 8, 1974 in Book 170 of Maps at page 36; thence along the northerly line of said
Subdivision, north 70°55’07” east 65.07 feet; thence north 73°22’17” east 52.68 feet; thence north 82°50’17” east
225.73 feet; thence along the northern line of Subdivision 4224 filed December 19, 1973 in Book 165 of Maps at
page 38 north 82°50’17” east 31.00 feet; thence north 83°04’37” east 507.95 feet; thence north 84°25’17” east
13.83 feet; thence along the northerly line of Subdivision 4077, north 84°25’17” east 314.46 feet; thence north
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
81°53’52” east 372.07 feet; thence along the northerly line of Amended Map Subdivision 3653 filed June 13, 1974
in Book 169 of Maps at page 42, north 81°53’52” east 46.99 feet; thence north 82°39’37” east 260.45 feet more
or less to a point of curvature on the north line of Lot 16, Subdivision 4223 filed December 19, 1973 in Book 165 of
Maps at page 31; thence along the northerly line of said Subdivision, north 83°04’37” east 1009.26 feet to the
western line of Lot 80 in Subdivision 4076 filed December 9, 1970 in Book 134 of Maps at page 19; thence along
said Lot 80, north 00°58’07” east 8.16 feet; thence north 82°22’27” east 60.45 feet to the northeast corner of said
Lot being also the northwestern corner of Lot 15 Subdivision 4378 filed June 10, 1977 in Book 198 of Maps at page
8; thence along the northerly line of said Subdivision the following seven courses; thence north 82°22’27” east
120.00 feet; thence north 87°17’02” east 82.74 feet; thence south 58°54’13” east 168.88 feet; thence south
69°31’13 east 43.97 feet; thence north 82°38’57” east 172.35 feet; thence south 87°58’43” east 73.67 feet; thence
south 83°56’58” east 83.15 feet; thence along the northerly line of Subdivision 5353 filed December 21, 1978 in
Book 219 of Maps at page 44 the following twenty courses; thence south 83°56’58” east 163.59 feet; thence south
79°55’08” east 176.44 feet; thence north 77°14’02” east 62.13; thence north 57°14’12” east 49.86 feet; thence
north 43°06’52” east 26.12 feet; thence north 21°46’37” east 32.03 feet; thence north 14°54’32” east 55.15 feet;
north 02°38’12” east 76.77 feet; thence north 10°04’07” east 93.55 feet; thence north 27°32’47” east 87.19 feet;
thence north 34°36’52 east 63.80 feet; thence north 45°23’17” east 71.36 feet; thence north 35°01’32” east 173.30
feet; thence north 44°21’42” east 78.12 feet; thence north 67°09’37” east 76.44 feet; thence south 81°13’28” east
71.20 feet; thence south 70°22’33” east 96.67 feet; thence south 71°02’13” east 80.05 feet; thence south
76°51’23” east 3.33 feet; thence south 89°02’35” east 779.76 feet; thence along the easterly line of said Subdivision
the following three courses; thence south 00°57’32” west 216.15 feet; thence south 77°22’13” east 31.45 feet;
thence south 13°53’01” west 327.93 feet; thence southerly along the easterly line of said Subdivision 5353, the
easterly line of Subdivision 5586 filed November 7, 1979 in Book 233 of Maps at page 13, the easterly line of
Subdivision 6026 filed April 2, 1981 in Book 250 of Maps at page 33, the easterly line of Subdivision 6145 filed June
17, 1982 in Book 264 of Maps at page 32, the easterly line of Marina Road recorded July 17, 1981 in series No. 81-
88549, the easterly line of the parcel described in the grant deed recorded April 23, 1979 in Book 9320 Official
Records page 418, the easterly line of the parcel described in the grant deed recorded June 20, 1972 in Book 6678
Official Records page 355, and the easterly line of said Subdivision 7252 (337 M 30), south 00°44’31” west 9792.35
feet to the point of beginning.
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit B: Area of Benefit Boundary Map
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit C: Road Improvement Plan – Project List with
Associated Costs
Allocation of Project Costs to Central County AOB Program
Recommended Project Estimated Total
Cost
Percent
Allocated to
AOB
Cost allocated to
AOB
Pleasant Hill Road Pedestrian and Bicycle
Improvements $2,754,000 8.25% $227,297
Reliez Valley Road Bicycle Improvements $7,284,000 8.25% $601,173
Taylor Blvd and Gloria Terrace Intersection
Safety Improvements $2,504,000 8.25% $206,663
Fish Ranch Road Safety Improvements $5,818,000 8.25% $479,985
San Pablo Dam Road Safety Improvements $3,036,500 2.36% $71,744
San Pablo Dam Road Bicycle Improvements $3,036,500 8.25% $250,612
Bear Creek Road and Happy Valley Road
Intersection Improvements $21,000 2.83% $594
Pinehurst Road Bicycle Improvements $1,974,000 8.25% $162,921
Ayers Road and Concord Avenue Intersection
Improvements $661,000 6.12% $40,456
Ayers Road and Laurel Avenue Intersection
Improvements $1,471,000 1.78% $26,143
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
Bailey Road and Myrtle Drive Intersection
Improvements $638,000 0.44% 2,805
Bailey Road Shoulder $606,000 8.25% 49,995
Las Juntas Road Intersection Improvements $858,000 84.17% $722,156
Buskirk Avenue Roadway Improvements $2,995,000 3.29% $98,540
Treat Boulevard Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvements $3,045,000 8.25% $251,314
Treat Boulevard Bicycle Improvements $3,376,000 8.25% $278,632
Treat Boulevard and Jones Road Intersection
Improvements $1,442,000 2.97% $42,895
Mayhew Way Pedestrian Improvements $988,000 8.25% $81,543
Olympic Boulevard and Boulevard Way/Tice
Valley Boulevard Intersection Improvements $1,048,000 1.66$ $17,402
Olympic Boulevard and Bridgefield Road
Intersection Improvements $845,000 2.00$ $16,926
Olympic Boulevard Pedestrian and Bicycle
Improvements $3,984,000 8.25% $328,813
Dewing Lane Pedestrian Bridge over Las
Trampas Creek $7,502,000 8.25% $619,165
Tice Valley Boulevard Bicycle and
Pedestrian Improvements $5,804,000 8.25% $479,023
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
Springbrook Road Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvements $5,976,000 8.25% $493,219
Boulevard Way Sidewalk Project $3,827,000 8.25% $315,855
Total: $71,949,000 8.20% $5,865,871
Allocation of Carry Over Project Costs to be Funded with Existing Balance
Rudgear Road and San Miguel Drive
Intersection Safety Improvements $3,588,000 8.25% $294,130
Walnut Boulevard Pedestrian Improvements $4,001,000 8.25% $330,216
Mountain View Boulevard Pedestrian
Improvements $3,470,000 8.25% $286,391
San Miguel Drive Pedestrian and Bicycle
Improvements $9,079,000 8.25% $749,320
Total: $20,138,000 8.25% $1,662,056
Source: DKS Associates, 2018
Development Program Report
For the
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit D: Nexus Study - Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit D
Attached as Separate Document
Nexus StudyCentral County
Area of Benet
Prepared For:Contra Costa CountyPublic Works Department
March 2021
Prepared By:
in association with Urban Economics
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program
Nexus Study
Central County Area of Benefit Program
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program
(this page has been left blank intentionally)
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program i
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Background and Purpose .............................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Central County AOB ..................................................................................................................... 1
2. Evaluation of Current AOB Program .................................................................................................... 2
3. Determination of AOB Development Potential .................................................................................... 6
4. Transportation Needs Analysis ............................................................................................................. 7
4.1 Traffic Count Data ........................................................................................................................ 8
4.3 Travel Demand Forecasting .......................................................................................................... 8
4.4 Roadway/Intersection Analysis ..................................................................................................... 8
4.5 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit Infrastructure Needs Analysis .................................................. 29
4.6 Selected Project List.................................................................................................................... 29
5. Improvement Cost Estimates .............................................................................................................. 30
6. Basis for Allocating Costs to New Development ............................................................................... 39
6.1 Improvements to Meet County LOS Standards .......................................................................... 39
6.2 Widening to Meet Roadway Pavement Width Standards ........................................................... 39
6.3 Bikeway and Walkway Improvements ....................................................................................... 41
6.4 Summary of Cost Allocation ....................................................................................................... 42
7. Method for Calculating Fees ............................................................................................................... 46
8. Nexus Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 47
8.1 Purpose of fee ............................................................................................................................. 48
8.2 Use of Fees .................................................................................................................................. 48
8.3 Relationship between use of Fees and Type of Development .................................................... 48
8.4 Relationship between Need for Facility and Type of Development ........................................... 48
8.5 Relationship between Amount of Fees and the Cost of Facility Attributed to Development upon
which Fee is Imposed .............................................................................................................................. 49
8.6 Current AOB Fund Balance ........................................................................................................ 49
Appendices
Appendix A - Cost Estimates for Specific Projects to be Completed from the 1994/1995 Central County
AOB Project List
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program ii
Appendix B - Cost Estimates for Selected Projects in Central County AOB
List of Tables
Table 1: 1994/1995 Project List for Central County and South Walnut Creek AOB Programs ................... 3
Table 2: Specific Projects to be Completed from the 1994/1995 AOB Project List .................................... 3
Table 3: Estimated Development Potential for Central County/South Walnut Creek .................................. 7
Table 4: Intersection Level of Service Analysis ........................................................................................... 9
Table 5: Roadway Segment Level of Service Analysis .............................................................................. 11
Table 6: Two Lane Rural/Lane Widths Contra Costa Public Works Department Standard Plans ............. 29
Table 7: Selected Central County/South Walnut Creek AOB Project List ................................................. 30
Table 8: Cost Allocation Analysis for Central County AOB Project List - Level of Service Improvements
.................................................................................................................................................................... 40
Table 9: Cost Allocation Analysis for Central County AOB Project List - Bicycle & Pedestrian
Improvements ............................................................................................................................................. 41
Table 10: Allocation of Project Costs to Central County AOB Program ................................................... 43
Table 11: Dwelling Unit Equivalent (DUE) Rates ..................................................................................... 46
Table 12: Growth in DUEs ......................................................................................................................... 47
Table 13: Nexus-Based Fee Rates for Central County AOB ...................................................................... 47
List of Figures
Figure 1: Central County AOB Boundary .................................................................................................... 4
Figure 2: Remaining Projects from the 1994/1995 AOB Project List to be Funded .................................... 5
Figure 3: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – West Pleasant Hill .................................. 15
Figure 4: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – West Pleasant Hill ....................................... 16
Figure 5: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – Northwest Lamorinda ............................. 17
Figure 6: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – Northwest Lamorinda .................................. 18
Figure 7: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – Southwest Lamorinda ............................. 19
Figure 8: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – Southwest Lamorinda .................................. 20
Figure 9: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – East Concord .......................................... 21
Figure 10: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – East Concord .............................................. 22
Figure 11: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – Contra Costa Centre ............................. 23
Figure 12: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – Contra Costa Centre ................................... 24
Figure 13: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – South Walnut Creek ............................. 25
Figure 14: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – South Walnut Creek ................................... 26
Figure 15: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – San Miguel ........................................... 27
Figure 16: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – San Miguel ................................................. 28
Figure 17: Selected Projects for Central County AOB Program – West Pleasant Hill ............................... 33
Figure 18: Selected Projects for Central County AOB Program – Northwest Lamorinda ......................... 34
Figure 19: Selected Projects for Central County AOB Program – Southwest Lamorinda ......................... 35
Figure 20: Selected Projects for Central County AOB Program – East Concord ....................................... 36
Figure 21: Selected Projects for Central County AOB Program – Contra Costa Centre ............................ 37
Figure 22: Selected Projects for Central County AOB Program – South Walnut Creek ............................ 38
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 1
1. Introduction
1.1 Background and Purpose
The purpose of the Central County Area of Benefit (AOB) Program is to help fund improvements to the
County’s roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities needed to accommodate travel demand generated by
new land development within the unincorporated portion of this AOB.
Contra Costa County has various methods for financing transportation improvements. One of the methods
is the AOB Program. The AOB Program collects funds from new development in the unincorporated
portion of the AOB to finance a portion of the transportation improvements associated with travel demand
generated by that development. Fees are differentiated by type of development in relationship to their
relative impacts on the transportation system. The intent of the AOB program is to provide an equitable
means of ensuring that future development contributes its proportional share of the cost of transportation
improvements, so that the County’s General Plan Circulation policies and quality of life can be
maintained.
One of the objectives of the County General Plan is to relate new development directly to the provision of
community facilities necessary to serve that new development. Accordingly, there is a mechanism in
place to provide the funding for the infrastructure necessary to serve that development. The Central
County AOB Program is a fee mechanism providing funds to construct transportation improvements to
serve new residential, commercial and industrial development within the AOB. Requiring that all new
development pay a transportation improvement fee ensures that it participates fairly in the cost of
improving the transportation system. This Program applies only to new development within the
unincorporated portions of Central County.
Each new development project or expansion of an existing development will generate new travel demand
for all travel modes. Where the existing transportation system is inadequate to meet future needs based on
new development, improvements are required to meet the new demand. The purpose of this development
program is to determine improvements that will ultimately be needed to serve estimated future
development and to require the developers to pay a fee to fund its proportional share of the cost of these
improvements. Because the fee is based on the relative impact of new development on the transportation
system and the costs of the necessary improvements to mitigate this impact, the fee amount is roughly
proportional to the development impact. This Nexus Study establishes this impact and mitigation
relationship to new development and the basis for the fee amount.
1.2 Central County AOB
The Central County AOB covered by this Nexus Study represents a consolidation of two AOBs: Central
County and South Walnut Creek. An initial countywide Area of Benefit for the unincorporated portions
of Contra Costa County was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on March 15, 1988. The original
countywide Area of Benefit consisted of seven regions: West County, Central County, Lamorinda,
Alamo, South County, East County and Bethel Island. The Central County region was divided into four
subareas: Briones, Martinez, Central County and South Walnut Creek. Over the next ten years, Areas of
Benefit were developed for each of the subregions. On December 6, 1994 the Board of Supervisors
passed a resolution forming the South Walnut Creek Area of Benefit and on June 13, 1995 passed a
resolution forming the Central County Area of Benefit. At the time the Central and South Walnut Creek
AOBs were adopted, there were many vacant parcels in the area with potential for residential and
commercial development, and the existing transportation system was inadequate to handle the additional
traffic generated from the projected development.
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 2
Over the past 27 years, Area of Benefit fees have helped pay for improvements in the Central County and
South Walnut areas. Today, most of the development potential in these two AOBs would be from in-fill
development representing less than ten percent increase in residential units and less than twenty percent
increase in commercial floor space. To maintain flexibility on how to respond to the transportation
mitigation needs for new development, the County staff recommends combining the Central County and
South Walnut Creek AOBs into a single AOB referred to as Central County.
The Central County area has, in recent years, experienced changes in the area's circulation needs and
development potential. Most of the residential development potential has been fulfilled, and some of the
original Area of Benefit projects have been constructed. These changes have prompted another revision to
the Area of Benefit program, resulting in a new project list and fee schedule.
The purpose of this Nexus Study is to provide the technical basis for a comprehensive update of the
Central County AOB Program. The focus of the updated program is to support a multi-modal
transportation system in the Central County AOB that serves the expected future demand based on
changes in regional and local land use projections, planned and approved development projects, and
associated changes to capital improvements and updated cost estimates.
This report documents the analytical approach for determining the nexus between the fees, the local
impact created by new development in the Central County AOB, and the transportation improvements to
be funded with fee revenues to mitigate transportation impacts. A traffic and fair-share cost analysis was
conducted to equitably distribute the costs of the necessary improvements to developments that cause the
impacts, in accordance with the provisions of the Mitigation Fee Act.1 The most up-to-date versions of
the analytical tools and techniques available at the time this study commenced were used to ensure the
highest level of consistency with current standards.
The Central County AOB boundary is shown in Figure 1. The area within the boundary includes a
portion of the cities of Pleasant Hill, Walnut Creek, Concord, Clayton Lafayette, Moraga, and Orinda.
However, fees will only be collected within the unincorporated portions of the AOB and will only fund
projects within the unincorporated portions of the AOB.
2. Evaluation of Current AOB Program
The current South Walnut Creek AOB and Central County AOB Programs were last updated in 1994 and
1995, respectively. The current project list for these two AOBs, shown in Table 1, has eight projects,
which were estimated in 1995 to cost about $9.5 million, of which $7.7 million was to be funded by the
AOB Program. Most of these have been completed or have had funds dedicated to completing them. The
others are no longer being considered for implementation. The safety improvements on Rudgear Road,
San Miguel Drive, Walnut Boulevard, and Mountain View Boulevard will be funded from the existing
account balance. A more detailed listing of these projects and the estimated cost of each is provided in
Table 2. The locations of the projects are shown in Figure 2. More detail on the nature and expected cost
of these projects is provided in Appendix A. The 2017 update of the Central County AOB Program has
included a new needs analysis as the basis of an updated project list of new projects and cost estimates,
which are described in Sections 3, 4 and 5 of this Nexus Study.
1 California Government Code, Sections 66000 through 66026.
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 3
Table 1: 1994/1995 Project List for Central County and South Walnut Creek AOB Programs
Project/Roadway Location Recommended Project
Estimated
Project Cost
(1995 Dollars)
Project Cost to be
Funded by AOB
(1995 Dollars)
Taylor Blvd Pleasant Hill Rd to
Boyd Rd
Safety and capacity
improvements $670,000 $670,000
Pleasant Hill
Rd/Taylor Blvd Intersection Safety and capacity
improvements $2,000,000 $2,000,000
Bailey Rd Bridge
Remove and replace existing
bridge. New bridge adequate
for standard two-lane arterial
$200,000 $200,000
Rudgear Rd, San
Miguel Dr, Walnut
Blvd, Mountain View
Blvd
Safety improvements $350,000 $350,000
San Pablo Dam
Rd/Bear Creek Rd Intersection Construct Signal $60,000 $60,000
Paso Nogal/Golf
Club Rd Intersection Improve intersection $70,000 $70,000
Evora Rd Extension Willow Pass Rd to
Port Chicago Hwy Construct new road $3,350,000 $3,350,000
Olympic Blvd Tice Valley Blvd
to I-680 Widen Roadway $2,800,000 $1,000,000
Total $9,500,000 $7,700,000
Source: Contra Costa County, 1994 and 1995
Table 2: Specific Projects to be Completed from the 1994/1995 AOB Project List
Roadway Project Location Recommended Project
Estimated
Project Cost
Rudgear Rd SM1 Intersection at
San Miguel Dr
Intersection safety
improvements $3,588,000
Walnut Blvd SM2
View lane to 250’
northwest of
Walnut Ct
Pedestrian improvements
$4,001,000
Mountain View
Blvd SM3 Blackwood Dr to
Walnut Blvd Pedestrian improvements
$3,470,000
San Miguel Dr SM4 Rudgear Rd to
Blackwood Dr
Pedestrian and bicycle
improvements $9,079,000
Total $20,138,000
Source: DKS Associates, 2021
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 4
Figure 1: Central County AOB Boundary
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 5
Figure 2: Remaining Projects from the 1994/1995 AOB Project List to be Funded
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 6
The current AOB Program uses “peak hour factors” to allocate trips by land use types based on Institute
of Transportation Engineers (ITE) trip generation rate estimates for the evening (PM) peak hour based on
the amount of traffic coming in and out of development’s entrances. This Nexus Study refines this
approach to reflect current best practices for impact fee programs when estimating the impact of new
development on the transportation system.
The use of simple trip generation rates tends to over-estimate the traffic impact of retail development on
the overall roadway system. The average length of trips coming in and out of a new residential
development is longer than trips coming in and out of a retail development. Furthermore, studies show
that about 25 to 50 percent of the trips that will go in and out of a new retail development will already be
traveling on roadways near that development, and thus are “pass-by” or “diverted” trips, not “new trips”
to the surrounding roadway system. All of the trips going to and from a new residential unit are “new
trips”.
To integrate best practices for the current fees, the updated Central County AOB Program will instead use
estimates of vehicle-miles of travel (VMT) added by new development. The VMT rates multiply the trip
rate for a land use type by its average trip length and also use percentages to reflect “pass-by trips” versus
“new trips.” The calculation of fee rates based on this methodology is discussed in Section 4 of this
study.
3. Determination of AOB Development Potential
The transportation needs analysis and allocation of improvement costs for the Central County AOB is
based on the countywide travel demand model developed by the Contra Costa Transportation Agency
(CCTA) using a 2040 horizon year. The calculation of fees is based on the following general land use
categories and associated measurement units that are used as a basis for the land use inputs in CCTA’s
travel demand model:
__Land Use Type__ _____Units_____
Single-Family Dwelling units (DU)
Multi-Family Dwelling units (DU)
Commercial/Retail Jobs
Office Jobs
Industrial Jobs
CCTA’s latest land use estimates of existing conditions and 2040 forecasts of new development by
Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) in the AOB were summarized and reviewed with County Planning staff.
Based on that review, adjustments were made and the resulting growth estimate for the AOB is
summarized in Table 3. The table converts the estimates of jobs for nonresidential land uses used by the
CCTA’s model to estimates of building square feet used in the AOB fee program.
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 7
Table 3: Estimated Development Potential for Central County/South Walnut Creek
Land Use
Category Units Due per
Unit
Units DUEs
2010 2040 Growth 2010 2040 Growth
Single-Family DU 1.00 7,429 7,733 304 7,429 7,733 304
Multi-family DU 0.61 3,639 4,180 541 2,234 2,566 332
Total DU 11,068 11,913 845 9,663 10,299 636
Retail Jobs 578 746 168
Office Jobs 3,103 3,773 670
Industrial Jobs 2,139 2,383 244
Total Jobs 5,820 6,902 1,082
Retail 1,000 sq. ft. 0.00142 289 373 84 410 529 119
Office 1,000 sq. ft. 0.00115 853 1038 184 979 1,191 211
Industrial 1,000 sq. ft. 0.00091 1283 1430 146 1,168 1,302 133
Total 1,000 sq. ft. 2,426 2,840 415 2,558 3,022 463
Total: 12,221 13,321 1,099
Proportion of DUE Growth to the Total DUEs in 2040: 1,099/13,321 = 0.0825
Source: DKS Associates, 2016
Notes: Land Use Assumed Square Feet
per Job
Retail 500
Office 275
Industrial 600
4. Transportation Needs Analysis
Defining the transportation needs and project list for the Central County AOB involved the following
steps:
1. Collecting traffic count data (intersections and roadway segments)
2. Identifying existing deficiencies, including level of service (LOS) and roadway standard
deficiencies
3. Preparing travel demand forecasts of 2040 conditions
4. Conducting transportation system analysis to identify improvement needs
5. Identifying pedestrian and bicycle facilities/improvements
6. Preparing a draft AOB project list
7. Presenting analysis and findings at a neighborhood outreach meeting to obtain input on the draft
project list
8. Finalizing project list
The key technical tasks used to determine the transportation improvements needed to accommodate new
development within the AOB and select a project list are described in Sections 4.1 through 4.6.
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 8
4.1 Traffic Count Data
Traffic count data is required to determine existing deficiencies and to support the future year
roadway/intersection needs analysis. Traffic counts were collected on weekdays in May 2013 on major
roadway segments and intersections within the AOB (see Tables 3 and 4).
4.2 Existing Deficiencies
The technical methods and standards used to identify the impact of new development on roadway and
intersection vehicular congestion are described in Section 4.4 below. The same methods and standards are
used to identify existing deficiencies in the roadway network. When an existing deficiency is identified, it
affects how the cost of an improvement is allocated to new development. New development can only fund
its fair share of the total cost of an improvement not associated with correcting an existing deficiency (see
Section 6).
4.3 Travel Demand Forecasting
The transportation needs analysis and allocation of improvement costs were based on CCTA’s travel
demand model using a 2040 horizon year and the development assumptions summarized in Table 3.
Before its use, the output of the CCTA travel demand model for existing conditions was compared to
existing traffic count data in the AOB area and some adjustments were made to the model within and near
the AOB to improve its accuracy and detail.
4.4 Roadway/Intersection Analysis
This section describes the analysis used to determine the roadway improvements needed to accommodate
new development within the AOB.
Signal Warrants
Traffic signal warrants are a series of standards that provide guidelines for determining if a traffic signal
is appropriate. A planning-level signal warrant analysis based on traffic volumes was conducted to
determine if the traffic signals would be warranted at study intersections under existing and future (2040)
conditions. If one or more of the signal warrants are met, signalization of the intersection may be
recommended.
Level of Service
The needs analysis for the Central County AOB Program used the level of service (LOS) standards in the
County’s General Plan, which has different standards for different areas, based on land use types. In the
Central County Area, LOS D or better conditions are considered acceptable while LOS E or F conditions
are considered unacceptable, except in central business districts such as the Contra Costa Centre area,
where a LOS of E may be acceptable. LOS is calculated separately for intersections and roadway
segments. Intersection LOS analysis is based on average vehicle delay and analysis methods
recommended by the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2010). Roadway
segment LOS analysis compares traffic levels with roadway segment capacities determined by the
number of travel lanes and the roadway type. The intersection and roadway segment LOS analysis is
summarized in Tables 4 and 5 as well as Figures 3 through 17.
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 9
Table 4: Intersection Level of Service Analysis
Intersection Area Area
Type Control LOS
Standard
Delay
Standard
(seconds)
Existing Cumulative
AM PM AM PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
1 Reliez Valley Rd &
Grayson Rd (NB)1
West Pleasant
Hill Suburban AWSC Low D ≤ 30 9.4 A 9.1 A 15.6 C 14.3 B
2 Reliez Valley Rd &
Withers Ave (SB)1
West Pleasant
Hill Suburban AWSC Low D ≤ 30 8.1 A 7.7 A 10.7 B 13.4 B
3 Taylor Blvd & Withers
Ave
West Pleasant
Hill Suburban Signal Low D ≤ 45 16.5 B 16.6 B 24.2 C 43.9 D
4 Withers Ave & Pleasant
Hill Road (SB)1
West Pleasant
Hill Suburban AWSC Low D ≤ 30 12.6 B 12.6 B 16.7 C 16.8 C
5 Bear Creek Rd & Happy
Valley Rd (WB)1
Northwest
Lamorinda
Semi-
Rural TWSC High C ≤ 25 8.8 A 8.7 A 32.1 D 10.3 B
6 Camino Pablo & Bear
Creek Rd
Northwest
Lamorinda
Semi-
Rural Signal High C ≤ 35 10.7 B 13.1 B 79.9 E 16.1 B
7 Concord Blvd & Ayers
Rd East Concord Suburban Signal Low D ≤ 45 30.6 C 22.4 C 93.4 F 27.4 C
8 Ayers Rd & Laurel Dr
(SB)1 East Concord Suburban AWSC Low D ≤ 30 8.9 A 7.6 A 43.1 E 17.8 C
9 Ayers Rd & Myrtle Dr
(EB)1 East Concord Suburban AWSC Low D ≤ 30 8.8 A 7.4 A 44.9 E 39.8 E
10 Myrtle Dr & Bailey Rd
(SB)1 East Concord Suburban TWSC Low D ≤ 30 29.4 D 12.2 B 62 F >300 F
11 Treat Blvd & Buskirk
Ave
Contra Costa
Centre CBD Signal Low E ≤ 67.5 121.4 F 153.4 F 212.1 F 158 F
12 Treat Blvd & Oak Rd Contra Costa
Centre CBD Signal Low E ≤ 67.5 42.4 D 35.7 D 48.8 D 46 D
13 Treat Blvd & Jones Rd Contra Costa
Centre CBD Signal Low E ≤ 67.5 27.5 C 67 E 38.6 D 91.1 F
14 Oak Rd & Wayne Ct Contra Costa
Centre CBD Signal Low E ≤ 67.5 14.3 B 23.8 C 15.4 B 37.9 D
15 Oak Rd & Las Juntas Wy Contra Costa
Centre CBD Signal Low E ≤ 67.5 13.9 B 17.5 B 14.6 B 19.7 B
16 Boulevard Wy & Flora
Ave (NB)1
South Walnut
Creek Suburban TWSC Low D ≤ 30 10.5 B 10.3 B 10.5 B 13.5 B
17 Buskirk Ave & Oak
Road
Contra Costa
Centre CBD Signal Low E ≤ 67.5 25.6 C 39.1 D 35.6 D 57.8 E
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 10
Intersection Area Area
Type Control LOS
Standard
Delay
Standard
(seconds)
Existing Cumulative
AM PM AM PM
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS
18 Oak Rd & Jones Rd Contra Costa
Centre CBD Signal Low E ≤ 67.5 14.7 B 21.6 C 17.8 B 38.8 D
19 Olympic Blvd & Paulson
Ln/SB Off-ramp
South Walnut
Creek Suburban Signal Low D ≤ 45 29.4 C 24.5 C 81.3 F 72.3 E
20 Mayhew Way &
Bancroft Rd (EB)1
Contra Costa
Centre Suburban TWSC Low D ≤ 30 31 D 54.8 F >300 F 173.2 F
21 Las Juntas Way &
Coggins Dr (WB)1
Contra Costa
Centre CBD AWSC Low E ≤ 42.5 17.6 C 15.8 C 53.9 F 38.8 E
22 Treat Blvd & Cherry Ln Contra Costa
Centre Urban Signal High D ≤ 55 18.6 B 11.9 B 47.2 D 18.8 B
23 Oak Rd/N Civic Dr &
Walden Rd (WB)1
Contra Costa
Centre Suburban Signal Low D ≤ 45 8 A 5.1 A 15.9 B 7.5 A
24 Boulevard Wy & Garden
Ct/Kinney Dr
South Walnut
Creek Suburban TWSC Low D ≤ 30 Synchro Does Not Support
Analysis
Synchro Does Not Support
Analysis
25
Olympic Blvd &
Boulevard Wy/Tice
Valley Blvd
South Walnut
Creek Suburban Signal Low D ≤ 45 33.6 C 60.5 E 64.6 E 99.1 F
26 Olympic Blvd & Newell
Ave
South Walnut
Creek Suburban Signal Low D ≤ 45 0.8 A 0.8 A 0.8 A 0.8 A
27 Boulevard Wy & Warren
Rd (WB)1
South Walnut
Creek Suburban TWSC Low D ≤ 30 10.1 B 11 B 0.4 A 11.2 B
28 Boulevard Wy & Saranap
Ave (SB)1
South Walnut
Creek Suburban TWSC Low D ≤ 30 1.1 A 13.6 B 11.8 B 20.2 C
29 San Miguel Dr &
Rudgear Rd (SB)1 San Miguel Suburban TWSC Low D ≤ 30 15.3 C 12.7 B 38.6 E 37.1 E
30 Mountain View Blvd &
Palmer Rd (NB)1 San Miguel Suburban TWSC Low D ≤ 30 11.2 B 11.2 B 13.2 B 9.1 A
31 Mountain View Blvd &
Bales Dr (NB)1 San Miguel Suburban TWSC Low D ≤ 30 5.7 A 11 B 20.3 C 10.3 B
32 Mountain View Blvd &
Walnut Blvd (WB)1 San Miguel Suburban AWSC Low D ≤ 30 7.3 A 7.1 A 6.7 A 7.1 A
1 Minor stop-controlled LOS based on worst approach
LOS highlighted in gray does not meet County’s standard
Source: DKS Associates, 2016
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 11
Table 5: Roadway Segment Level of Service Analysis
Roadway Location Area Area Type1 LOS Standard1 V/C Ratio Standard1
2013 2040
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
V/C LOS
Range V/C LOS
Range V/C LOS
Range V/C LOS
Range
Reliez
Valley Rd
North of Grayson Rd West Pleasant
Hill Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.21 A-C 0.20 A-C 0.53 A-C 0.49 A-C
Between Grayson Rd
& Withers Ave
West Pleasant
Hill Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.11 A-C 0.08 A-C 0.30 A-C 0.35 A-C
Withers Ave
Between Reliez Valley
Rd & Taylor Blvd
West Pleasant
Hill Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.13 A-C 0.25 A-C 0.24 A-C 0.40 A-C
Between Taylor Blvd
& Pleasant Hill Rd
West Pleasant
Hill Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.18 A-C 0.15 A-C 0.29 A-C 0.36 A-C
Taylor Blvd
North of Withers Ave West Pleasant
Hill Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.54 A-C 0.46 A-C 0.71 A-C 0.59 A-C
South of Withers Ave West Pleasant
Hill Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.52 A-C 0.49 A-C 0.69 A-C 0.59 A-C
Pleasant Hill
Rd
Between Taylor Blvd
& Geary Rd
West Pleasant
Hill Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.18 A-C 0.23 A-C 0.22 A-C 0.29 A-C
Bear Creek
Rd
North of Happy
Valley Rd
Northwest
Lamorinda Rural Low C ≤ 0.75 0.07 A-C 0.06 A-C 0.24 A-C 0.24 A-C
South of Happy
Valley Rd
Northwest
Lamorinda Rural Low C ≤ 0.75 0.09 A-C 0.07 A-C 0.34 A-C 0.14 A-C
East of Camino Pablo Northwest
Lamorinda Rural Low C ≤ 0.75 0.08 A-C 0.08 A-C 0.32 A-C 0.13 A-C
San Pablo
Dam Rd West of Camino Pablo Northwest
Lamorinda Rural Low C ≤ 0.75 0.76 A-C 0.79 A-C 1.05 F 0.99 F
Fish Ranch
Rd West of CA-24 Northwest
Lamorinda Rural Low C ≤ 0.75 0.58 A-C 0.88 D-E 0.61 A-C 0.74 A-C2
Pinehurst Rd West of Canyon Rd Southwest
Lamorinda Rural Low C ≤ 0.75 0.07 A-C 0.08 A-C 0.15 A-C 0.08 A-C
Concord
Blvd
West of Ayers Rd East Concord CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.39 A-C 0.38 A-C 0.51 A-C 0.36 A-C
East of Ayers Rd East Concord CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.66 A-C 0.60 A-C 0.86 D-E 0.65 A-C
Ayers Rd North of Concord
Blvd East Concord Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.32 A-C 0.22 A-C 0.77 A-C 0.61 A-C
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 12
Roadway Location Area Area Type1 LOS Standard1 V/C Ratio Standard1
2013 2040
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
V/C LOS Range V/C LOS Range V/C LOS Range V/C LOS Range
South of Concord
Blvd East Concord Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.45 A-C 0.36 A-C 0.70 A-C 0.50 A-C
Between Laurel Dr &
Myrtle Dr East Concord Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.25 A-C 0.15 A-C 0.69 A-C 0.54 A-C
Myrtle Rd Between Ayers Rd &
Bailey Rd East Concord Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.16 A-C 0.10 A-C 0.55 A-C 0.42 A-C
Bailey Rd North of Myrtle Dr East Concord Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.59 A-C 0.32 A-C 1.86 F 1.36 F
South of Myrtle Dr East Concord Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.58 A-C 0.34 A-C 1.23 F 0.82 D-E
Geary Rd West of Buskirk Ave Contra Costa
Centre Urban High D ≤ 0.90 0.72 A-C 0.73 A-C 0.87 D-E 0.88 D-E
Treat Blvd
Between Buskirk Ave
& Oak Rd
Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.77 A-C 0.81 D-E 0.93 D-E 0.91 D-E
Between Oak Rd &
Jones Rd
Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.64 A-C 0.62 A-C 0.74 A-C 0.76 A-C
Between Cherry Ln &
Jones Rd
Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.77 A-C 0.77 A-C 0.84 D-E 0.90 D-E
East of Cherry Ln Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.79 A-C 0.76 A-C 0.86 D-E 0.91 D-E
Oak Rd
Between Treat Blvd &
Wayne Ct
Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.39 A-C 0.46 A-C 0.42 A-C 0.55 A-C
Between Treat Blvd &
Jones Rd
Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.49 A-C 0.42 A-C 0.54 A-C 0.54 A-C
Between Wayne Ct &
Las Juntas Way
Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.42 A-C 0.42 A-C 0.43 A-C 0.48 A-C
Between Las Juntas
Way & Buskirk Ave
Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.41 A-C 0.44 A-C 0.50 A-C 0.51 A-C
Between Oak Park
Blvd & Buskirk Ave
Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.54 A-C 0.49 A-C 0.59 A-C 0.52 A-C
South of Jones Rd Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.39 A-C 0.44 A-C 0.44 A-C 0.58 A-C
Las Juntas
Way East of Oak Rd Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.35 A-C 0.31 A-C 0.40 A-C 0.43 A-C
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 13
Roadway Location Area Area Type1 LOS Standard1 V/C Ratio Standard1
2013 2040
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
V/C LOS Range V/C LOS Range V/C LOS Range V/C LOS Range
Buskirk Ave
West of Oak Rd Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.41 A-C 0.57 A-C 0.47 A-C 0.57 A-C
North of Treat Blvd Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.93 D-E 1.33 F 0.95 D-E 1.33 F
I-680 NB
On-Ramp West of Oak Rd Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.41 A-C 0.50 A-C 0.44 A-C 0.57 A-C
Jones Rd
West of Oak Rd Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.30 A-C 0.20 A-C 0.38 A-C 0.34 A-C
East of Oak Rd Contra Costa
Centre CBD Low E ≤ 0.95 0.24 A-C 0.37 A-C 0.32 A-C 0.54 A-C
Bancroft Rd
North of Mayhew
Way
Contra Costa
Centre Urban High D ≤ 0.90 0.84 D-E 0.76 A-C 0.96 D-E 0.94 D-E
South of Mayhew
Way
Contra Costa
Centre Urban High D ≤ 0.90 0.28 A-C 0.25 A-C 0.50 A-C 0.46 A-C
Mayhew
Way West of Bancroft Rd Contra Costa
Centre Urban High D ≤ 0.90 0.60 A-C 0.47 A-C 0.74 A-C 0.52 A-C
Coggins Dr
North of Las Juntas
Way
Contra Costa
Centre Urban High D ≤ 0.90 0.42 A-C 0.40 A-C 0.52 A-C 0.55 A-C
South of Las Juntas
Way
Contra Costa
Centre Urban High D ≤ 0.90 0.65 A-C 0.57 A-C 0.83 D-E 0.77 A-C
N Civic Dr South of Walden Rd Contra Costa
Centre Urban High D ≤ 0.90 0.39 A-C 0.41 A-C 0.41 A-C 0.49 A-C
Olympic
Blvd
West of Tice Valley
Blvd
South Walnut
Creek Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.30 A-C 0.33 A-C 0.50 A-C 0.49 A-C
East of Tice Valley
Blvd
South Walnut
Creek Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.46 A-C 0.52 A-C 0.70 A-C 0.69 A-C
East of Newell Ave South Walnut
Creek Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.47 A-C 0.52 A-C 0.71 A-C 0.68 A-C
Tice Valley
Blvd
South of Olympic
Blvd
South Walnut
Creek Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.58 A-C 0.63 A-C 0.63 A-C 0.71 A-C
Boulevard
Wy
Between Olympic
Blvd and Warren Rd
South Walnut
Creek Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.25 A-C 0.31 A-C 0.31 A-C 0.31 A-C
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 14
Roadway Location Area Area Type1 LOS Standard1 V/C Ratio Standard1
2013 2040
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
V/C LOS Range V/C LOS Range V/C LOS Range V/C LOS Range
Between Garden Ct &
Saranap Ave
South Walnut
Creek Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.13 A-C 0.17 A-C 0.14 A-C 0.19 A-C
Between Saranap Ave
& Flora Ave
South Walnut
Creek Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.17 A-C 0.24 A-C 0.18 A-C 0.31 A-C
East of Flora Ave South Walnut
Creek Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.19 A-C 0.24 A-C 0.19 A-C 0.27 A-C
Between Warren Rd &
Kinney Dr
South Walnut
Creek Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.20 A-C 0.25 A-C 0.25 A-C 0.27 A-C
Newell Ave South of Olympic
Blvd
South Walnut
Creek Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.34 A-C 0.35 A-C 0.49 A-C 0.41 A-C
Springbrook
Rd
Between Regency Ct
& Sherwood Wy
South Walnut
Creek Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.08 A-C 0.08 A-C 0.17 A-C 0.15 A-C
Mountain
View Blvd
West of Palmer Rd San Miguel Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.26 A-C 0.25 A-C 0.27 A-C 0.26 A-C
Between Palmer Rd &
Bales Dr San Miguel Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.29 A-C 0.23 A-C 0.46 A-C 0.14 A-C
Between Bales Dr &
Walnut Blvd San Miguel Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.08 A-C 0.09 A-C 0.08 A-C 0.09 A-C
Walnut Blvd
South of Mountain
View Blvd San Miguel Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.09 A-C 0.09 A-C 0.09 A-C 0.09 A-C
North of Mountain
View Blvd San Miguel Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.07 A-C 0.06 A-C 0.07 A-C 0.06 A-C
Rudgear Rd
West of San Miguel
Dr San Miguel Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.50 A-C 0.47 A-C 0.58 A-C 0.58 A-C
East of San Miguel Dr San Miguel Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.35 A-C 0.32 A-C 0.55 A-C 0.51 A-C
San Miguel
Dr North of Rudgear Rd San Miguel Suburban Low D ≤ 0.85 0.19 A-C 0.18 A-C 0.29 A-C 0.26 A-C
1Contra Costa County General Plan, 2005
2Improvement in LOS in 2040 forecasted due to tunnel improvements
LOS highlighted in gray does not meet County’s standard
Source: DKS Associates, 2016
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 15
Figure 3: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – West Pleasant Hill
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 16
Figure 4: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – West Pleasant Hill
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 17
Figure 5: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – Northwest Lamorinda
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 18
Figure 6: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – Northwest Lamorinda
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 19
Figure 7: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – Southwest Lamorinda
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 20
Figure 8: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – Southwest Lamorinda
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 21
Figure 9: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – East Concord
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 22
Figure 10: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – East Concord
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 23
Figure 11: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – Contra Costa Centre
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 24
Figure 12: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – Contra Costa Centre
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 25
Figure 13: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – South Walnut Creek
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 26
Figure 14: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – South Walnut Creek
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 27
Figure 15: Existing Levels of Service in Central County AOB – San Miguel
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 28
Figure 16: 2040 Levels of Service in Central County AOB – San Miguel
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 29
Roadway Pavement Width Standards
Many of the County’s two-lane roads within the Central County AOB will not have LOS problems but
volume increases on narrow roads within the AOB is a safety issue that should be addressed in the AOB
Program. Providing adequate roadway width including adding shoulders to two-lane roadways would
increase safety as traffic increases and shoulders would provide a bicycle lane/walkway. FHWA
recommends that rural roadways that carry more than 2,000 average daily vehicles (ADT) should have 5
to 6-foot wide shoulders. Contra Costa County’s standards for two-lane roadways, shown in Table 6, call
for shoulders on roadways with more than 1,000 ADT.
Table 6: Two Lane Rural/Lane Widths Contra Costa Public Works Department Standard Plans
Average Daily Traffic Shoulder Backing (ft.) Shoulder (ft.) Lane (ft.)
< 250 0 1 11
< 400 2 1 11
< 1,000 2 4 12
< 3,000 2 5 12
< 6,000 2 6 12
> 6,000 0 8 12
Source: Contra Costa County Public Works Department Standard Plans, 2008
4.5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Needs Analysis
New development also necessitates changes to roadway design that are not geared toward increases in
vehicle capacity or improvements to vehicle safety. New development generates non-vehicular trips
(pedestrian and bicycle) that will need to be accommodated by improving roadway shoulders to provide
bicycle lanes and pedestrian walkways. On roadways that require improvements based on the
roadway/intersection analysis, described above, pedestrian and bicycle facilities would be implemented to
the extent that they are represented in the County’s current standard roadway designs.
Pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure improvements may also reduce vehicular congestion by shifting trips
from autos to these alternative modes. The County’s General Plan has goals to encourage the use of
transit (Goal 5-I) and to reduce single-occupant auto commuting and encourage walking and bicycling
(Goal 5-J). The General Plan also has policies to encourage all efforts to develop alternative
transportation systems to reduce peak period traffic congestion (Policy 5-23) and to encourage the use of
alternative forms of transportation, such as pedestrian, bicycle and transit modes in order to provide basic
accessibility to those without access to a personal automobile and to help minimize automobile
congestion and air pollution.
4.6 Selected Project List
A draft list of capital improvements to the transportation system in the AOB Programs was prepared. The
project list is focused on the major transportation system in the County’s General Plan (see Sections 5.6
and 5.8 of the General Plan, which describe the major roadway, transit, bikeway and pedestrian facilities).
This list generally consists of the following types of projects:
1. Installing traffic signals at intersections that meet warrants for their installation
2. Adding turn lanes at intersections to meet LOS standards
3. Adding lanes on roadway segments to meet LOS standards
4. Upgrading roadways to be consistent with County design standards
5. Making improvements to improve safety for all modes of transportation
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 30
6. Providing appropriate pedestrian and bicyclist facility improvements
The draft project list was prepared to meet the needs defined above and then was presented at a public
meeting for neighborhood residents. Based on comments from the residents, the drafted list was revised.
The revised list is shown in Table 7 and Figures 17 through 23.
5. Improvement Cost Estimates
Planning-level cost estimates were prepared based on conceptual designs for each project (Table 7) and
the design could change in the future based on the circulation needs as growth occurs. The estimates for
roadway segment improvements are based on implementing the County’s design standards (for roadway
cross-sections) by facility type and number of lanes. The cost estimates reflect the known issues, such as
creek crossings, relocation of major known utilities, etc. Typical excavation quantities were used except
in areas where significant excavation was identified. The cost estimating does not have geotechnical or
survey support information. Thus the cost of unknown constraints (such as rock excavation, removal of
unsuitable material, relocation of unseen utilities, etc.) were assumed in a project contingency percentage.
The cost estimates include the following appropriate percentages that are key elements in the
implementation of each project:
• Project contingencies,
• Survey, design and construction management,
• Environmental mitigation,
• Right-of-way acquisition
The cost estimates for each of the selected projects for funding by the Central County AOB, shown in
Table 7 are provided in Appendix B.
Table 7: Selected Central County/South Walnut Creek AOB Project List
Roadway Project Location Recommended Project Basis for Recommendation
Pleasant Hill Road WPH2 Geary Road to Taylor
Boulevard
Bicycle
improvements
Countywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan
Reliez Valley Road WPH3
North of Grayson
Road to Withers
Avenue
Bicycle
improvements
Countywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan
Taylor Boulevard WPH4 Intersection at Gloria
Terrace
Safety
improvements Community Input
Fish Ranch Road NL1 SR-24 to Grizzly Peak
Road
Safety
improvements
Contra Costa County
Standard Plans
San Pablo Dam Road NL2/3 West of Camino Pablo Roadway safety
improvements
Contra Costa County
Standard Plans; CCTA’s
Comprehensive
Transportation Project List
Bear Creek Road NL5 Intersection at Happy
Valley Road
Intersection
improvements
Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards
Pinehurst Road SL1 West of Canyon Road Bicycle
improvements
Countywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 31
Roadway Project Location Recommended
Project Basis for Recommendation
Ayers Road
EC2 Intersection at
Concord Avenue
Intersection
improvements Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards EC3 Intersection at Laurel
Avenue
Intersection
improvements
Bailey Road EC4/6
Intersection and
segment at Myrtle
Drive
Intersection
improvements; Add
shoulder
Contra Costa County
Standard Plans; Contra
Costa County General Plan
LOS Standards
Las Juntas Road CCC1 Intersection at Coggins
Drive
Intersection
improvements
Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards
Buskirk Avenue CCC2 North of Treat
Boulevard
Roadway
improvements
Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards
Treat Boulevard
CCC3/5 From I-680 Overpass
to Jones Road
Complete Street
Improvements
Countywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan
CCC4 From Jones Road to
Walnut Creek Bridge
Complete Street
Improvements
Countywide Bicycle and
Pedestrian Plan
CCC6 Intersection at Jones
Road
Intersection
improvements
Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards
Mayhew Way CCC8 West of Bancroft
Avenue
Pedestrian
improvements
Contra Costa County
General Plan
Olympic Boulevard
SWC2
Intersection at
Boulevard Way/Tice
Valley Boulevard
Intersection
improvements
Contra Costa County
General Plan LOS Standards
SWC7 Intersection at
Bridgefield Road
Intersection
improvements Community Input
SWC9 Windtree Court to I-
680
Bicycle and
pedestrian
improvements
Olympic Corridor Trail
Connector Study
Dewing Lane SWC3 Between Dewing Lane
and So Villa Way
Connection of South
Walnut Creek to
Iron Horse Trail
Community Input
Tice Valley
Boulevard SWC4
Tice Valley Lane to
200' east of Tice
Hollow Court
Complete Street
Improvements Community Input
Springbrook Road SWC6
170 ft east of Gilmore
Street to 460 ft east of
Regency Court
Complete Street
Improvements Community Input
Boulevard Way SWC8 Warren Road to
Olympic Boulevard Sidewalk project Community Input
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 32
Roadway Project Location Recommended
Project Basis for Recommendation
Carry-over Projects from 1994/1995 AOB Project List
Rudgear Rd SM11 Intersection at San
Miguel Dr
Intersection safety
improvements Carry-over Project
Walnut Blvd SM21
View Lane to 250’
northwest of Walnut
Ct
Pedestrian
improvements Carry-over Project
Mountain View
Blvd SM31 Blackwood Dr to
Walnut Blvd
Pedestrian
improvements Carry-over Project
San Miguel Dr SM41 Rudgear Rd to
Blackwood Dr
Pedestrian
improvements Carry-over Project
1See Figure 2 for map of carry-over projects.
Source: DKS Associates, 2018
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 33
Figure 17: Selected Projects for Central County AOB Program – West Pleasant Hill
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 34
Figure 18: Selected Projects for Central County AOB Program – Northwest Lamorinda
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 35
Figure 19: Selected Projects for Central County AOB Program – Southwest Lamorinda
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 36
Figure 20: Selected Projects for Central County AOB Program – East Concord
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 37
Figure 21: Selected Projects for Central County AOB Program – Contra Costa Centre
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 38
Figure 22: Selected Projects for Central County AOB Program – South Walnut Creek
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 39
6. Basis for Allocating Costs to New Development
This section describes the process used to allocate transportation improvement costs to new development
in the AOB and the estimated transportation mitigation fees that result from this analysis.
The allocation of costs of roadway and intersection improvements in the AOB is based on answering the
following questions:
• Is there an existing deficiency?
• Would the improvement project be required without new development?
• Who uses the roadway/intersection?
The allocation of costs is based on estimates of who will use the roadways or intersections that require
improvements based on 2040 traffic forecasts. The allocation of improvement costs is based on the
percentage of trips on the roadways and intersections from 1) existing development, 2) new development
in the AOB and 3) new development outside the AOB (referred to as through traffic). An increase in
through traffic represents an increase in trips that both start and end outside the AOB and pass through the
AOB. Table 8 summarizes the estimated percentages for the selected AOB project list. The methods used
to allocate costs are described below.
6.1 Improvements to Meet County LOS Standards
Costs for improvements needed to address LOS impacts (either intersection or roadway LOS) are
allocated to new development in the Central County AOB using one of three methods:
1. For a roadway segment or intersection that is currently operating at an acceptable LOS but would
operate at an unacceptable LOS in 2040, the entire cost of improving that segment or intersection
is allocated to new development if there is no increase in through traffic. This method did not
apply to any improvements on the Central County AOB project list.
2. If the current and future LOS conditions are the same as described under #1 but there is an
increase in the amount of through traffic then new development within the AOB is not allocated
the full cost of the improvement. Instead, new development within the AOB is allocated a
percentage of costs based the number of new trips on a roadway segment or intersection that have
either their origin or destination within the AOB divided by the total amount of trips from new
development. The remaining percent of costs, reflecting new trips that have neither their origin
nor destination in the AOB, are not allocated to development in the AOB. This method was used
to allocate costs for improvements on San Pablo Dam Road, Bear Creek Road, Ayers Road,
Bailey Road, and Las Juntas Road.
3. For a roadway segment or intersection that currently does not meet the County’s LOS standards
(an existing deficiency), the percent cost share for new development in the AOB is equal to the
number of new trips on a roadway segment that have either their origin or destination within the
AOB divided by all trips on that roadway, both from existing and new development (including
through traffic). This method was used to allocate costs for improvements on Fish Ranch Road,
Buskirk Avenue, Treat Boulevard, and Olympic Boulevard.
6.2 Widening to Meet Roadway Pavement Width Standards
4. The allocation of costs to improve roadway to County cross-section standards is similar to the
allocation of cost for improvements to address LOS impacts. For a roadway segment that is
currently below the traffic volume thresholds shown in Table 6 but would exceed those
thresholds by 2040, the entire cost of improving that segment to the County standard will be
allocated to new development. If that roadway has an increase in the amount of through traffic
then new development within the AOB is allocated a percentage of costs based on the number of
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 40
Table 8: Cost Allocation Analysis for Central County AOB Project List - Level of Service Improvements
Roadway Project Location Recommended Project
Existing Conditions 2040 Conditions Percent of 2040 Volume Percent of 2013
to 2040 Growth Percent Allocated to AOB PM Peak Period Volume4 LOS PM Peak Period Volume4 LOS1 Existing Local Local Growth Existing Through Through Growth Local Through
San Pablo
Dam Road NL3 West of Camino
Pablo
Roadway safety
improvements 6,000 A-C 6,995 F 3.73 0.34 82.05 13.88 2.36 97.64 2.36
Bear Creek
Road NL5 Intersection at
Happy Valley Road
Intersection
improvements 1,183 A 1,306 D5 2.95 0.27 87.66 9.12 2.83 97.17 2.83
Ayers Road
EC2 Intersection at
Concord Avenue2
Intersection
improvements 6,854 C 9,089 F 16.73 1.50 58.69 23.08 6.12 93.88 6.12
EC3 Intersection at
Laurel Avenue2
Intersection
improvements 2,573 A 3,936 E 6.84 0.62 58.53 34.01 1.78 98.22 1.78
Bailey
Road EC4 Intersection at
Myrtle Drive2
Intersection
improvements 4,443 D 11,573 F 3.01 0.27 35.38 61.34 0.44 99.56 0.44
Las Juntas
Road CCC1 Intersection at
Coggins Drive2
Intersection
improvements 4,231 C 4,634 F 81.31 7.31 10.00 1.38 84.17 15.83 84.17
Buskirk
Avenue CCC2 North of Treat
Boulevard
Roadway
improvements 2,295 F 2,641 F 36.57 3.29 50.34 9.80 25.14 74.86 3.29
Treat
Boulevard CCC6 Intersection at Jones
Road3
Intersection
improvements 18,293 E 20,876 F 33.07 2.97 54.56 9.40 24.04 75.96 2.97
Olympic
Boulevard
SWC2
Intersection at
Boulevard Way/Tice
Valley Boulevard3
Intersection
improvements 13,899 E 15,919 F 18.46 1.66 68.85 11.03 13.08 86.92 1.66
SWC7 Intersection at
Bridgefield Road
Intersection
improvements 8,475 E 9,771 F 22.27 2.00 64.46 11.27 15.09 84.91 2.00
Notes: 1LOS without improvement; 2Sum of approach volumes, LOS is for PM peak hour; 3Sum of approach volumes, LOS is for AM peak hour; 44-hour peak period from model; 5AM cumulative
peak hour
Values highlighted in gray were used for AOB percent allocation
Source: DKS Associates, 2018
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 41
trips associated with new development within the AOB. This method did not apply to any improvements
on the Central County AOB project list.
For a roadway segment that currently has a traffic volume above the volume thresholds in Table 5 and
does not meet the County’s applicable cross-section standards (an existing deficiency), the percent cost
share for new development in the AOB is equal to the number of new trips on a roadway segment that
have either their origin or destination within the AOB divided by all trips on that roadway, both from
existing and new development.
6.3 Bikeway and Walkway Improvements
Bicycle and pedestrian improvements in the Central County/South Walnut Creek AOB are localized
improvements serving trips that have their origin or destination within the AOB rather than through trips.
Lack of bicycle and pedestrian facilities is an existing deficiency in the AOB; hence the improvements
will benefit both existing and future residents. Since the improvements will serve the existing and future
bicycle and pedestrian demand, the cost of those projects allocated to new development will equal the
new development’s proportional share of the total future development (existing plus new development) in
the Central County AOB (measured in Dwelling Unit Equivalents). This method was used to allocate
costs for improvements described in Table 9.
Table 9: Cost Allocation Analysis for Central County AOB Project List – Safety, Pedestrian, Bicycle and
Transit Infrastructure Improvements
Roadway Project Location Recommended Project Percent Allocated to AOB*
Fish Ranch Road NL1 SR-24 to Grizzly Peak Road Safety improvements 8.25
Pleasant Hill Road WPH2 Geary Road to Taylor
Boulevard Bicycle improvements 8.25
Reliez Valley
Road WPH3 North of Grayson Road to
Withers Avenue Bicycle improvements 8.25
Taylor Blvd WPH4 Intersection at Gloria Terrace Intersection Safety
improvements
8.25
San Pablo Dam
Road NL2 West of Camino Pablo Bicycle improvements 8.25
Pinehurst Road SL1 West of Canyon Road Bicycle improvements 8.25
Treat Boulevard
CCC3 From I-680 Overpass to Jones
Road
Bicycle and pedestrian
improvements 8.25
CCC4 From Jones Road to Walnut
Creek Bridge Bicycle improvements 8.25
Mayhew Way CCC8 West of Bancroft Avenue Pedestrian improvements 8.25
Bailey Road EC6 North and south of Myrtle
Drive Add shoulder 8.25
Dewing Lane SWC3 Between Dewing Lane and So
Villa Way
Pedestrian Bridge over Las
Trampas Creek 8.25
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 42
Roadway Project Location Recommended Project Percent Allocated
to AOB*
Tice Valley
Boulevard SWC4 Tice Valley Lane to 200' east
of Tice Hollow Court
Bicycle and pedestrian
improvements 8.25
Olympic
Boulevard SWC9 Windtree Ct to Newell Ct. Bicycle and pedestrian
improvements 8.25
Springbrook Road SWC6 Henri Hill Lane to Camino
Diablo
Bicycle and pedestrian
improvements 8.25
Boulevard Way SWC8 Warren road to Olympic
Boulevard Sidewalk Project 8.25
*Percentage allocation to AOB is the proportion of DUE growth to the total DUEs in 2040 (see Table 2).
Source: DKS Associates, 2018
6.4 Summary of Cost Allocation
Table 10 summarizes the allocation of the cost for each of the selected projects that will have funding
from the Central County AOB Program.
The County has various methods for funding transportation improvements within the Central County
AOB boundary. While the Central County AOB fee program is one method, additional funding will need
to be obtained from Federal, State and local grants (such as ATP, SRTS, BTA, etc.) or other sources to
fund the cost of the improvements not allocated to new development in the Central County AOB. On an
on-going basis, the County will assess the unconstructed projects on the AOB project list and determine
project priorities. As enough funding becomes available from all sources to implement “priority” projects,
the County will implement those projects.
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 43
Table 10: Allocation of Project Costs to Central County AOB Program
Roadway Project Location Recommended Project Estimated Total Cost Percent Allocated to AOB Cost Allocated to AOB
Pleasant Hill
Road WPH2 Geary Road to Taylor
Boulevard Bicycle improvements $2,754,000 8.25 $227,297
Reliez Valley
Road WPH3 North of Grayson Road to
Withers Avenue Bicycle improvements $7,284,000 8.25 $601,173
Taylor Blvd WPH4 Intersection at Gloria Terrace Intersection Safety
improvements $2,504,000 8.25 $206,663
Fish Ranch
Road NL1 SR-24 to Grizzly Peak Road Safety improvements $5,818,000 8.25 $479,985
San Pablo Dam
Road NL2/31 West of Camino Pablo
Roadway safety
improvements $3,036,500 2.36 $71,744
Bicycle improvements $3,036,500 8.25 $250,612
Bear Creek
Road NL5 Intersection at Happy Valley
Road Intersection improvements $21,000 2.83 $594
Pinehurst Road SL1 West of Canyon Road Bicycle improvements $1,974,000 8.25 $162,921
Ayers Road
EC2 Intersection at Concord
Avenue Intersection improvements $661,000 6.12 $40,456
EC3 Intersection at Laurel Avenue Intersection improvements $1,471,000 1.78 $26,143
Bailey Road
EC4 Intersection at Myrtle Drive Intersection improvements $638,000 0.44 $2,805
EC6 North and south of Myrtle
Drive Add shoulder $606,000 8.25 $49,995
Las Juntas
Road CCC1 Intersection at Coggins Drive Intersection improvements $858,000 84.17 $722,156
Buskirk
Avenue
CCC2 North of Treat Boulevard Roadway improvements $2,995,000 3.29 $98,540
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 44
Roadway Project Location Recommended Project Estimated Total Cost
Percent
Allocated to AOB Cost Allocated to AOB
Treat
Boulevard
CCC3/5 From I-680 Overpass to
Jones Road
Bicycle and pedestrian
improvements $3,045,000 8.25 $251,314
CCC4 From Jones Road to Walnut
Creek Bridge Bicycle improvements $3,376,000 8.25 $278,632
CCC6 Intersection at Jones Road Intersection improvements $1,442,000 2.97 $42,895
Mayhew Way CCC8 West of Bancroft Avenue Pedestrian improvements $988,000 8.25 $81,543
Olympic
Boulevard
SWC2 Intersection at Boulevard
Way/Tice Valley Boulevard Intersection improvements $1,048,000 1.66 $17,402
SWC7 Intersection at Bridgefield
Road Intersection improvements $845,000 2.00 $16,926
SWC 9 Windtree Court to Newell
Court.
Pedestrian and Bicycle
Improvements $3,984,000 8.25 $328,813
Dewing Lane SWC3 Between Dewing Lane and
So Villa Way
Pedestrian bridge over Las
Trampas Creek $7,502,000 8.25 $619,165
Tice Valley
Boulevard SWC4 Tice Valley Lane to 200' east
of Tice Hollow Court
Bicycle and pedestrian
improvements $5,804,000 8.25 $479,023
Springbrook
Road SWC6 Henri Hill Lane to Camino
Diablo
Bicycle and pedestrian
improvements $5,976,000 8.25 $493,219
Boulevard Way SWC8 Warren Road to Olympic
Boulevard Sidewalk project $3,827,000 8.25 $315,855
Total: $71,494,000 8.20 $5,865,871
Rudgear Rd SM12 Intersection at San Miguel
Dr
Intersection safety
improvements $3,588,000 8.25 $296,130
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 45
Roadway Project Location Recommended Project Estimated Total Cost
Percent
Allocated to AOB Cost Allocated to AOB
Walnut Blvd SM22 View Lane to 250’
northwest of Walnut Ct Pedestrian improvements $4,001,000 8.25 $330,216
Mountain
View Blvd SM32 Blackwood Dr to Walnut
Blvd Pedestrian improvements $3,470,000 8.25 $286,391
San Miguel
Dr SM42 Rudgear Rd to Blackwood
Dr
Pedestrian and bicycle
improvements $9,079,000 8.25 $749,320
Total: $20,138,000 8.25 $1,662,056
Notes:
1Cost estimate treats the roadway widening and bicycle improvements as one project, so it was assumed that the cost was split 50%/50% between roadway widening and
bicycle improvements, which was based on the relative widths of the improvements.
2Carry-over projects to be funded with existing balance.
Source: DKS Associates, 2021
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 46
7. Method for Calculating Fees
Land Use Categories
The calculation of fees for the AOB Program Updates will be based on the general land use categories
that can be derived for all areas of the county from CCTA’s travel demand model. These general
categories are the following:
__Land Use Type__ _____Units_____
Single-Family Dwelling units (DU)
Multi-Family Dwelling units (DU)
Commercial/Retail 1,000 Sq. Ft.
Office 1,000 Sq. Ft
Industrial 1,000 Sq. Ft
Dwelling Unit Equivalents
In the allocation of costs to various types of development, each development type will be assigned a
“dwelling unit equivalent” or “DUE” rate. DUEs are numerical measures of how the trip-making
characteristics of a land use compare to a typical single-family residential unit, which is assigned a DUE
of 1. Land uses that have greater overall traffic impacts than a typical single-family residential unit are
assigned values greater than 1, while land uses with lower overall traffic impacts than a typical single-
family residential unit are assigned DUE values less than 1.
DUEs are developed by comparing both the trip generation and trip length characteristics of various land
uses to those same rates for a typical single-family residential unit. Since roadway needs are primarily
based on traffic flows and conditions during the PM peak hour on an average weekday, the DUEs reflect
the relative trip generation for the peak hour. Also considered in the calculation of DUEs are “percent
new” trips since some of the vehicles attracted to non-residential uses would have been on the roadway
system regardless of the presence of the traffic generated by the new development. Average trip lengths
for the remaining "primary" trips generated by a development are then utilized to better reflect overall
impact of longer trips on the County’s roadway system.
The DUE rates will thus be based on estimates of the average vehicle-miles of travel (VMT) generated
during the PM peak hour for each general land use type. The DUE rates that will be used to estimate the
Central County AOB fees are shown in Table 11.
Table 11: Dwelling Unit Equivalent (DUE) Rates
Land Use Category PM Peak Hour Trip Rate per Unit1 Unit
Trip
Length
(miles)2
Percent
New
trips2
VMT
per
Unit
DUE
per
Unit
Singe Family 1.01 Dwelling
Unit
5.0 100 5.050 1.00
Multi-Family 0.62 5.0 100 3.100 0.61
Retail 4.10 Square
Feet
2.3 76 7.167 0.00142
Office 1.40 4.5 92 5.796 0.00115
Industrial 0.98 5.1 92 4.598 0.00091
1 ITE Trip Generation 7th Edition
2 ITE Journal, May 1992
Source: DKS Associates, 2016
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 47
Fee Calculation
The cost per DUE (i.e. cost for a typical single-family dwelling unit) is calculated by dividing the total
costs allocated to new development in the AOB (methods described above) by the total growth in DUEs
in the AOB by 2040 (see Table 12). The cost for each land use type is then based on its DUE rate. The
nexus-based fee rates are shown in Table 13.
Table 12: Growth in DUEs
Land Use Category Unit Growth in
Units1
DUE
per Unit
Growth in
DUEs
Singe Family Dwelling
Unit
304 1.00 304
Multi-Family 541 0.61 332
Retail Square
Feet
84,000 0.00142 119
Office 184,000 0.00115 211
Industrial 146,000 0.00091 133
Total 1,099
1 See Table 2: “Summary of Estimated Development 2010 to 2040 Growth”
Source: DKS Associates, 2016
Table 13: Nexus-Based Fee Rates for Central County AOB
Cost of Improvements Allocated to AOB Growth $5,865,871
AOB Account Balance (as of August 2016) $0
Unfunded Allocated Costs $5,865,871
Growth in Dwelling Unit Equivalents (DUE's) 1099
Cost per DUE $5,335.39
Land Use Units Fee per Unit1
Single Family Dwelling Unit $5,335
Multi-Family Dwelling Unit $3,275
Retail Square Foot $7.57
Office Square Foot $6.12
Industrial Square Foot $4.86
1Fee per Unit = (Cost per DUE) x (DUE per Unit)
Source: DKS Associates, 2018
8. Nexus Analysis
A nexus analysis has been prepared on the Central County AOB Program in accordance with the
procedural guidelines established in AB1600 which is codified in California Government Section 66000
et seq. These code sections set forth the procedural requirements for establishing and collecting
development impact fees. These procedures require that “a reasonable relationship or nexus must exist
between a governmental exaction and the purpose of the condition.” Specifically, each local agency
imposing a fee must:
• Identify the purpose of the fee;
• Identify how the fee is to be used;
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 48
• Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the use of the fee use and the type of
development project on which the fee is imposed;
• Determine how a reasonable relationship exists between the need for the public facility and the
type of development project on which the fee is imposed; and,
• Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the cost of public
facility or portion of the public facility attributable to the development on which the fee is
imposed.
8.1 Purpose of fee
The purpose of the Central County AOB Program is to fund improvements to the County’s major
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities needed to accommodate travel demand generated by new land
development in the unincorporated portion of Central County AOB over the next 20 years (through
2040).
The Central County AOB Program will help meet the County’s General Plan policies including
maintenance of adequate levels of service and safety for roadway facilities. New development in the
unincorporated portions of the Central County AOB will increase the demand for all modes of travel
(including walking, biking, transit, automobile and truck/goods movement) and thus the need for
improvements to transportation facilities. The Central County AOB Program will help fund
transportation facilities necessary to accommodate new residential and non-residential development in the
unincorporated portions of the Central County AOB.
8.2 Use of Fees
The fees from new development in the Central County AOB Program will be used to fund additions and
improvements to the transportation system needed to accommodate future travel demand resulting from
residential and non-residential development within the Central County AOB. The Central County AOB
Program will help fund improvements to roadways (include the widening or extensions of arterial and
collector roadways, intersection improvements and provision of shoulders and complete streets) bikeways
and walkways plus fee program administration costs. The transportation improvements wholly or partially
funded by the program are described in more detail in Section 4.
8.3 Relationship between use of Fees and Type of Development
Fee revenues generated by the Central County AOB Program will be used to develop the transportation
improvements described in Section 4. All of these improvements increase the capacity, improve the
safety, or facilitate the use of alternative modes (transit, bicycle, pedestrian) on those segments of the
transportation system affected by new development. The results of the transportation modeling analysis
summarized in this report demonstrate that these improvements either mitigate impacts from and/or
provide benefits to new development.
8.4 Relationship between Need for Facility and Type of Development
The projected residential and non-residential development described in Section 3 will add to the
incremental need for transportation facilities by increasing the amount of demand on the transportation
system. The transportation analysis presented in Section 4 demonstrates that improvements are required
to minimize the negative impact on current levels of service caused by new development and/or
accommodate the increased need for alternative transportation modes (transit, bicycle, pedestrian).
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 49
8.5 Relationship between Amount of Fees and the Cost of Facility Attributed to Development upon
which Fee is Imposed
The basis for allocating improvement costs to development is described in Section 6. Construction of
necessary transportation improvements will directly serve residential and non-residential development
within the unincorporated portions of the AOB and will directly benefit development in those areas.
New development within the AOB is allocated a percentage of costs based the number of new trips on a
roadway segment or intersection that have either their origin or destination within the AOB divided by the
total amount of trips from new development. The remaining percent of costs, reflecting new trips that
have neither their origin nor destination in the AOB (through trips), are not allocated to development in
the AOB. For facilities that have an “existing deficiency”, the cost of the improvement that is allocated to
the Central County AOB Program is modified to account for that deficiency.
The fee that a developer pays for a new residential unit or commercial building varies by the type of
development based on its impact on the transportation system. Each development type is assigned a
“dwelling unit equivalent” or “DUE” rate based on its estimated vehicle-miles of travel (VMT) per unit of
development.
DUE’s are numerical measures of how the trip-making characteristics of a land use compare to a single-
family residential unit. DUE’s were developed by comparing both the trip generation and trip length
characteristics of various land uses to those of the single-family residential units. Since roadway needs
are primarily based on traffic flows and conditions during the peak hour on an average weekday, the
DUE’s reflect the relative trip generation for the peak hour. Also considered in the calculation of DUE’s
are “percent new” trips. The DUE rates were thus based on estimates of the average vehicle-miles of
travel (VMT) generated during the peak hour for each general land use type.
8.6 Current AOB Fund Balance
The Central County AOB has been earmarked for those carry-over projects from the project list approved
in 1995 that have not yet been completed (see Table 2). All funds collected under the program for both
the Central County AOB and the South Walnut Creek AOB were committed to projects on the original
list (see Table 1). The projects added in this update will receive funding from new development in the
AOB.
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 50
Appendix A
Cost Estimates for Specific Projects to be Completed from the
1994/1995 Central County AOB Project List
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number SM1
Project Name:Rudgear Road Intersection Improvements
Project Location Rudgear Road & San Miguel Drive
Description
Project Length (f
Date of Estimate Apr. 30, 2018 Revision No.
Revision Date
Prepared by:E. Vaca/J. Palma Revised by
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Traffic Control 1 LS $180,000.00 180,000$
4 Lighting (intersection only) 1 LS $100,000.00 100,000$
5 Landscaping 2,000 SF $25.00 50,000$
6 Drainage Modification - Culvert Extension 1 EA $100,000.00 100,000$
7 Roadway Excavation 1,902 CY $50.00 96,000$
9 Aggregate Base (assumed 1.80ft)1,268 CY $200.00 254,000$
10 Hot Mix Asphalt 728 TON $150.00 110,000$
11 Thermoplastic Traffic Striping 1 LS $5,000.00 5,000$
12 Relocate Roadside Signs/Add New Signs 3 EA $250.00 1,000$
13 Clearing and Grubbing 12,095 SF $3.00 37,000$
14 Tree Removal 1 EA $1,000.00 1,000$
15 Mobilization (10%)75,400$
Project Number SM1
Planning Engineering (TE)100,000$ Contract Items 934,000$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)* 25%234,000$ Other Costs (CON)161,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)50,000$ Contingency*187,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)40,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)1,282,000$
R/W Engineering (Survey)25,000$ Subtotal (Plan)100,000$
Real Property Labor 60,000$ Subtotal (PE)324,000$
R/W Acquisition 1,500,000$ Subtotal (R/W)1,585,000$
Construction Engineering * 15%141,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees 20,000$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)2,170,000$
Grand Total 3,291,000$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2018
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 20% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Rate 9.0%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)$ 3,588,000
Project would install a mini‐roundabout at the intersection of Rudgear Road and San Miguel Drive
N/A
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Transportation Engineering Planning Cost Estimate
Contra Costa County Public Works Department WO xxxx
Project Name:Walnut Blvd Sidewalk Project Part 2
Alternative:Sidewalk on Both Sides of Roadway
Project Location:Walnut Blvd between View Lane and 250' NW of Walnut Ct
Assumptions:R, TI, etc.
Project Length (ft):1,700
Date of Estimate:Oct. 6, 2015 Revision No.0
Revision Date
Prepared by:Tianjun Cao Revised by
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Construction Area Signs 6 EA 550.00$ 3,300$
2 Traffic Control System 1 LS 20,000.00$ 20,000$
3 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS 6,000.00$ 6,000$
4 Remove Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe 3400 LF 2.00$ 6,800$
5 Minor Structure (Sidewalk Cross Drain)1 EA 600.00$ 600$
6 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS 30,000.00$ 30,000$
7 Remove Tree 22 EA 2,000.00$ 44,000$
8 Saw Cut Pavement Edges 3400 LF 2.00$ 6,800$
9 Roadway Excavation 1039 CY 45.00$ 46,755$
10 Imported Material (Shoulder Backing)238 TON 45.00$ 10,710$
11 Class 2 Aggregate Base 1131 TON 45.00$ 50,895$
12 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)1849 TON 110.00$ 203,390$
13 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk)13650 SF 10.00$ 136,500$
14 ADA Curb Ramp 4 EA 3,500.00$ 14,000$
15 Driveway Conform 14 EA 10,000.00$ 140,000$
16 Curb and Gutter 3400 LF 45.00$ 153,000$
17 Earthwork 890 CY 25.00$ 22,250$
18 Minor Concrete (Retaining Wall)900 LF 140.00$ 126,000$
19 Minor Structure (Inlet)2 EA 3,200.00$ 6,400$
20 Metal Beam Guard Railing 300 LF 115.00$ 34,500$
21 C.3 Provisions and Misc. Drainage 1 LS 70,000.00$ 70,000$
22 Sign Relocation 8 EA 500.00$ 4,000$
23 Mailbox Removal and Replacement 6 EA 300.00$ 1,800$
24 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe - Det. 27B, Right Edge Line 3400 LF 2.00$ 6,800$
25 Mobilization 1 LS 115,000.00$ 115,000$
OTHER COSTS BY PHASE:
PLAN Planning Engineering (TE)200,000$ CONTRACT ITEMS 1,260,000$
PE Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*504,000$ OTHER COSTS (CON)289,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)50,000$ CONTINGENCY*189,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)200,000$ SUBTOTAL (CON)1,738,000$
R/W R/W Engineering (Survey)20,000$ SUBTOTAL (PLAN)200,000$
Real Property Labor 200,000$ SUBTOTAL (PE)754,000$
R/W Acquisition 500,000$ SUBTOTAL (R/W)720,000$
CON Construction Engineering *189,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees 100,000$ GRAND TOTAL 3,412,000$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)1,963,000$ CURRENT YEAR 2015
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)ESCALATION YEAR 2021
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)ESCALATION RATE 17.3%
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)$ 4,001,000
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
H:\AOB\Central County AOB\Projects\Walnut Blvd Estimate
WALNUT BLVDWAL
N
UT BL
V
DNOB HILL DRVIEW LNW ALNUT CT
S
H
A
D
Y
G
L
E
N R
D
SCALE: 1" = 130'
255 GLACIER DRIVE MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333 FEDERAL ID NO.:DB:TC CB:MH DATE:OCT 2015 SHEET 1 OF 1
WALNUT BLVD PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECT PART 2
PROJECT LAYOUT
LEGEND:
CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD
UTILITY POLE
RIGHT OF WAY LINE/PARCEL LINE
SIGN
2' TO 3' HIGH RETAINING WALL
TREE TO BE REMOVED
EX. SD INLET
CONC. CURB RAMP
SIDEWALK
DRIVEWAY CONFORM
COUNTY LIMITS
SHOULDER
EXISTING OR PROPOSED
N
Transportation Engineering Planning Cost Estimate
Contra Costa County Public Works Department WO xxxx
Project Name:Mt. View Blvd Sidewalk
Alternative:North Side of Roadway
Project Location:From Walnut Blvd to San Miguel Dr
Assumptions:R, TI, etc.
Project Length (ft):3800
Date of Estimate:Oct. 6, 2015 Revision No.0
Revision Date
Prepared by:Joey Herringshaw Revised by
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Construction Area Signs 12 EA 550.00$ 6,600$
2 Traffic Control System 1 LS 100,000.00$ 100,000$
3 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS 6,000.00$ 6,000$
4 Remove Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe 3800 LF 2.00$ 7,600$
5 Culvert Alteration 1 EA 1,000.00$ 1,000$
6 Minor Concrete (Driveway Conform)28 EA 4,000.00$ 112,000$
7 Relocate Mailbox 17 EA 350.00$ 5,950$
8 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS 30,000.00$ 30,000$
9 Remove Tree 5 EA 2,000.00$ 10,000$
10 Saw Cut Pavement Edges 3800 LF 2.00$ 7,600$
11 Roadway Excavation 2322 CY 45.00$ 104,490$
12 Imported Material (Shoulder Backing)532 TON 45.00$ 23,940$
13 Class 2 Aggregate Base 2527 TON 45.00$ 113,715$
14 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)4133 TON 110.00$ 454,630$
15 Minor Concrete (Curb and Gutter)3800 LF 25.00$ 95,000$
16 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk)19000 SF 12.00$ 228,000$
17 ADA Curb Ramp 7 EA 3,500.00$ 24,500$
17 C.3 Provisions and Misc. Drainage 1 LS 70,000.00$ 70,000$
18 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe - Det. 27B, Right Edge Line 3800 LF 2.00$ 7,600$ 27
19 Mobilization 1 LS 141,000.00$ 141,000$
OTHER COSTS BY PHASE:
OTHER COSTS BY PHASE:Planning Engineering (TE)200,000$ CONTRACT ITEMS 1,550,000$
PLAN Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*403,000$ OTHER COSTS (CON)253,000$
PE Utility Coordination (Design)40,000$ CONTINGENCY*233,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)80,000$ SUBTOTAL (CON)2,036,000$
R/W Engineering (Survey)40,000$ SUBTOTAL (PLAN)200,000$
R/W Real Property Labor 100,000$ SUBTOTAL (PE)523,000$
R/W Acquisition 60,000$ SUBTOTAL (R/W)200,000$
Construction Engineering *233,000$
CON Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees 20,000$ GRAND TOTAL 2,959,000$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)1,176,000$ CURRENT YEAR 2015
ESCALATION YEAR 2021
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)ESCALATION RATE 17.3%
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)$ 3,470,000
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
H:\AOB\Central County AOB\Projects\Mt. View Blvd Sidewalk Estimate
LEGEND
- PROPOSED SHOULDER
- PROPOSED SIDEWALK
- CURB RAMP
- DRIVEWAY CONFORM
- TREE REMOVAL
- EXISTING STOP SIGN
- ROAD CENTERLINE
property in the county ROW
House has wall fronting
- EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER
- EXISTING STORM DRAIN
- PARCEL PROPERTY LINE
MOUNTAIN VIEW BLVDSa
n Mi
g
u
el Dr Vallecit
o Ln My
n
a
h Ct
P
al
mer Rd La
ur
el Dr Ro
s
e
wo
o
d DrBales DrHa
z
el
wo
o
d Dr Ami
g
o Ln
W
al
nut Bl
vdSCALE: 1" = 200'
255 GLACIER DRIVE MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333 FEDERAL ID NO.:DB:JH CB:MH DATE:OCT 2015 SHEET 1 OF 1
MOUNTAIN VIEW BLVD PEDESTRIAN PROJECT
PROJECT LAYOUT
N
Transportation Engineering Planning Cost Estimate
Contra Costa County Public Works Department WO 4176
Project Name:San Miguel Drive Pedestrian Project
Alternative:East side north of Shady Glen and west side south of Shady Glen
Project Location:Blackwood Dr to Rudgear Rd
Assumptions:R, TI=6
Project Length (ft):8,000
Date of Estimate:Oct. 6, 2015 Revision No.0
Revision Date
Prepared by:Tianjun Cao Revised by
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Construction Area Signs 15 EA 550.00$ 8,250$
2 Traffic Control System 1 LS 50,000.00$ 50,000$
3 Major Earthwork or ped bridge 1 LS 200,000.00$ 200,000$
4 Remove Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe 8000 LF 2.00$ 16,000$
5 Remove Concrete 1 LS 10,000.00$ 10,000$
6 Remove AC 1 LS 15,000.00$ 15,000$
7 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS 150,000.00$ 150,000$
8 Tree Protection 1 LS 100,000.00$ 100,000$
9 Remove Tree 13 EA 1,200.00$ 15,600$
10 Tree Decking 4 LS 15,000.00$ 60,000$
11 Saw Cut Pavement Edges 8000 LF 2.00$ 16,000$
12 Earthwork for Path 1750 CY 25.00$ 43,750$
13 Graded Ditch/Swale 1000 LF 55.00$ 55,000$
14 Class 2 Aggregate Base 4256 TON 45.00$ 191,520$
15 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)6720 TON 115.00$ 772,800$
16 Hot Mix Asphalt Dike 8000 LF 25.00$ 200,000$
17 ADA Curb Ramp 16 EA 3,500.00$ 56,000$
18 Driveway Conform 20 EA 10,000.00$ 200,000$
19 Driveways 60 EA 5,000.00$ 300,000$
20 Minor Concrete (Retaining Wall)1000 LF 140.00$ 140,000$
21 Headwall 1 LS 14,000.00$ 14,000$
22 Transition Ramps 4 EA 2,500.00$ 10,000$
23 Guard Rail Replacement 1 LS 18,000.00$ 18,000$
24 C.3 Provisions and Drainage Modifications 1 LS 100,000.00$ 100,000$
25 Sign Relocation 1 LS 3,500.00$ 3,500$
26 No Parking Sign (R-26)5 EA 350.00$ 1,750$
27 Speed Feeback Sign 2 EA 13,000.00$ 26,000$
28 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe - Det. 27B, Right Edge Line 8000 LF 4.00$ 32,000$
29 Mobilization 1 LS 281,000.00$ 281,000$
OTHER COSTS BY PHASE:
PLAN Planning Engineering (TE)150,000$ CONTRACT ITEMS 3,086,000$
PE Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*710,000$ OTHER COSTS (CON)513,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)50,000$ CONTINGENCY*463,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)100,000$ SUBTOTAL (CON)4,062,000$
R/W R/W Engineering (Survey)50,000$ SUBTOTAL (PLAN)150,000$
Real Property Labor 120,000$ SUBTOTAL (PE)860,000$
R/W Acquisition 2,500,000$ SUBTOTAL (R/W)2,670,000$
CON Construction Engineering *463,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees 50,000$ GRAND TOTAL 7,742,000$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)4,193,000$ CURRENT YEAR 2015
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)ESCALATION YEAR 2021
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)ESCALATION RATE 17.3%
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)$ 9,079,000
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
H:\AOB\Central County AOB\Projects\San Miguel Estimate
SCALE: 1" = 200'
255 GLACIER DRIVE MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333 FEDERAL ID NO.:DB:TC CB:MH DATE:OCT 2015 SHEET 1 OF 2
SAN MIGUEL DR PEDESTRIAN PROJECT
PROJECT LAYOUT
LEGEND:
RIGHT OF WAY LINE/PARCEL LINE
CONC. CURB RAMP
DRIVEWAY CONFORM
COUNTY LIMITS
SHOULDER
EXISTING OR PROPOSED
PEDESTRIAN PATH
N
SCALE: 1" = 160'
255 GLACIER DRIVE MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333 FEDERAL ID NO.:DB:TC CB:MH DATE:OCT 2015 SHEET 2 OF 2
SAN MIGUEL DR PEDESTRIAN PROJECT
PROJECT LAYOUT
LEGEND:
RIGHT OF WAY LINE/PARCEL LINE
CONC. CURB RAMP
DRIVEWAY CONFORM
COUNTY LIMITS
SHOULDER
EXISTING OR PROPOSED
PEDESTRIAN PATH
N
Nexus Study - Central County AOB Program 51
Appendix B
Cost Estimates for Selected Projects in Central County AOB
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number WPH2
Project Name:Pleasant Hill Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements
Project Location:Pleasant Hill Road from Geary Road to Taylor Boulevard
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Jul. 6, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Earthwork 27650 SF $2.00 55,300$
2 Class 2 Aggregate Base 2048 CY $65.00 133,130$
3 Sidewalk 27650 SF $8.00 221,200$
4 Striping 9100 LF $3.00 27,300$
5 Install curb & gutter 9100 LF $35.00 318,500$
6 Signage 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
7 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)10 EA $4,200.00 42,000$
8 Clearing and grubbing 1 LS $30,000.00 30,000$
9 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $79,800.00 79,800$
10 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
11 Mobilization 1 LS 91,400.00$ 91,400$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)914,000$
Project Number WPH2
Planning Engineering (TE)138,000$ Contract Items 1,005,400$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*403,000$ Other Costs (CON)151,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)80,000$ Contingency*151,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)100,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)1,307,400$
R/W Engineering (Survey)50,000$ Subtotal (Plan)138,000$
Real Property Labor 120,000$ Subtotal (PE)583,000$
R/W Acquisition 150,000$ Subtotal (R/W)320,000$
Construction Engineering *151,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)1,192,000$
Grand Total 2,348,400$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)2,754,000$
Project would install curb/gutter and prohibit curbside parking to install buffered bicycle
lanes using the existing and new pavement on both sides of the roadway. New 5' sidewalks
would be constructed along both sides of the roadway. Several feet of right of way would
need to be acquired from four properties on the north side: 169-070-054, 169-070-055, 169-
070-049, 169-070-009.
Approximately 1760' of bike lane with 2 foot buffer, sidewalk, curb, and gutter and 600' of curb/gutter only on
the north side
Approximately 2190' of bike lane with 2 foot buffer, sidewalk, curb, and gutter on the south side
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project WPH2: Pleasant Hill Road Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements
Install new
buffered bike
lane, sidewalk,
curb, and gutter
Install new
buffered bike
lane, curb and
gutter
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number WPH3
Project Name:Reliez Valley Road Bicycle Improvements
Project Location:Reliez Valley Road from Withers Avenue to Grayson Road
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Aug. 28, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B . Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and grubbing 7750 SF $2.00 15,500$
2 Earthwork 7750 SF $4.00 31,000$
3 Class 2 Aggregate Base 574 CY $65.00 37,315$
4 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)256 Ton $125.00 31,969$
5 Curb & gutter 775 LF $35.00 27,125$
6 Restripe roadway 775 LF $10.00 7,750$
7 Misc. drainage modifications 1 LS $45,200.00 45,200$
1.Subtotal:195,859$
8 Restripe roadway 950 LF $10.00 9,500$
2.Subtotal:258,309$
9 Clearing and grubbing 27750 SF $2.00 55,500$
10 Earthwork 27750 SF $6.00 166,500$
11 Class 2 Aggregate Base 2056 CY $65.00 133,611$
12 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)916 Ton $125.00 114,469$
13 Sidewalk 12500 SF $8.00 100,000$
14 Curb & gutter 2775 LF $35.00 97,125$
15 Restripe roadway 2775 LF $10.00 27,750$
16 Retaining wall 3920 SF $85.00 333,200$
17 Misc. drainage modifications 1 LS $208,500.00 208,500$
3.Subtotal:1,504,463$
18 Signage 1 LS $2,500.00 2,500$
19 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $195,900.00 195,900$
20 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
21 Mobilization 1 LS 216,300.00$ 216,300$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)2,163,000$
3.350' north of Stagecoach Drive to (L=2775')
Project would construct two 5-foot bike lanes to enhance vehicle and bicyclist safety. From
Withers Avenue to Gloria Terrace, the 25-foot cross section would be widened to 35-feet on the
east side of the roadway (requiring major drainage modifications). From Gloria Terrace to 350-
feet north of Stagecoach Drive, the 40-foot cross section would generally be restriped to
provide bike lanes. In proximity to Stagecoach Drive, however, the presence of left turn pockets
would force the elimination of on-street parking on the east side of the roadway to fit in the
bike lanes. From north of Stagecoach Drive to Grayson Road, the 25-foot cross section would
be widened to 35-feet on the east side of the roadway (requiring major drainage modifications
and earthwork/retaining wall).
4500
1.Withers Avenue to Gloria Terrace (L=775')
2.Gloria Terrace to 350' north of Stagecoach Drive (L=950')
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project Number WPH3
Planning Engineering (TE)368,000$ Contract Items 2,379,300$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*952,000$ Other Costs (CON)357,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)120,000$ Contingency*595,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)150,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)3,331,300$
R/W Engineering (Survey)75,000$ Subtotal (Plan)368,000$
Real Property Labor 150,000$ Subtotal (PE)1,222,000$
R/W Acquisition/ Temp. Construction Easements 1,065,000$ Subtotal (R/W)1,290,000$
Construction Engineering *357,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)3,237,000$
Grand Total 6,211,300$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 25% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)7,284,000$
Project WPH3: Reliez Valley Road Bicycle Improvements
Gloria Terrace
Grayson Rd
Withers AveReliez Valley RdWiden roadway by 10-feet
Stripe 5-foot bike lanes
Widen roadway by 10-feet
Transportation Engineering Planning Cost Estimate
Contra Costa County Public Works Department WPH 4
Project Name:Taylor Boulevard/ Gloria Terrace Intersection Improvements
Alternative:
Project Location: Taylor Boulevard/ Gloria Terrace
Assumptions:R=5, TI=9
Project Length (ft):825
Date of Estimate:Aug. 28, 2017 Revision No.0
Revision Date
Prepared by:Connor Phippen Revised by
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Construction Area Signs 6 EA 400.00$ 2,400$
2 Traffic Control System 1 LS 20,000.00$ 20,000$
3 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS 2,000.00$ 2,000$
4 Remove Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe 550 LF 1.20$ 660$
5 Structural Concrete (Retaining Wall)355 CY 1,500.00$ 532,500$
6 Bar Reinforcing Steel (Retaining Wall)22025 LB 2.00$ 44,050$
7 Slope Excavation 831 CY 100.00$ 83,100$
8 Remove Curb 725 LF 10.00$ 7,250$
9 Install S1-6 Curb 725 LF 50.00$ 36,250$
10 Bike Lane Symbol Pavement Marking 2 EA 180.00$ 360$
11 Type I Arrow Striping 2 EA 250.00$ 500$
12 Remove Pavement 825 SF 0.24$ 198$
13 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS 5,000.00$ 5,000$
14 Remove Tree 8 EA 2,000.00$ 16,000$
15 Saw Cut Pavement Edges 825 LF 1.50$ 1,238$
16 Roadway Excavation 746 CY 170.00$ 126,820$
17 Imported Material (Shoulder Backing)52 TON 200.00$ 10,400$
18 Class 2 Aggregate Base 1097 TON 40.00$ 43,880$
19 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)1454 TON 170.00$ 247,180$
20 4-Strand Wire Fence Relocation 0 LF -$ -$
21 Thermoplastic Detail 27B 1200 LF 0.60$ 720$
OTHER COSTS BY PHASE:CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)1,181,000$
PLAN Planning Engineering (TE)80,000$ CONTRACT ITEMS 1,300,000$
PE Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*200,000$ OTHER COSTS (CON)205,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)15,000$ CONTINGENCY*195,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)100,000$ SUBTOTAL (CON)1,700,000$
R/W R/W Engineering (Survey)40,000$ SUBTOTAL (PLAN)80,000$
Real Property Labor -$ SUBTOTAL (PE)315,000$
R/W Acquisition -$ SUBTOTAL (R/W)40,000$
CON Construction Engineering *195,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees 10,000$ GRAND TOTAL 2,135,000$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)640,000$ CURRENT YEAR 2015
*Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)ESCALATION YEAR 2021
*Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)ESCALATION RATE 17.3%
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)2,504,000$
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number NL1
Project Name:Fish Ranch Road Safety Improvements
Project Location:Fish Ranch Road from SR-24 to Grizzly Peak Road
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Aug. 28, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Earthwork 36500 SF $8.00 292,000$
2 Class 2 Aggregate Base 2704 CY $65.00 175,741$
3 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)1205 Ton $125.00 150,563$
4 Striping 7300 LF $3.00 21,900$
5 Clearing and grubbing 1 LS $100,000.00 100,000$
6 Retaining wall 9000 SF $85.00 765,000$
7 Misc. drainage modifications 1 LS $111,000.00 111,000$
8 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $74,000.00 74,000$
9 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
10 Mobilization 1 LS 169,600.00$ 169,600$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)1,696,000$
Project Number NL1
Planning Engineering (TE)255,000$ Contract Items 1,865,600$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*747,000$ Other Costs (CON)280,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)80,000$ Contingency*467,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)1,050,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)2,612,600$
R/W Engineering (Survey)50,000$ Subtotal (Plan)255,000$
Real Property Labor 75,000$ Subtotal (PE)1,877,000$
R/W Acquisition 91,800$ Subtotal (R/W)216,800$
Construction Engineering *280,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)2,628,800$
Grand Total 4,961,400$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 25% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)5,818,000$
The project will enhance vehicle and bicycle safety by widening Fish Ranch Road to provide
shoulders in accordance with County standards. Additional right-of-way will be required to
accommodate drainage.
3650
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project NL1: Fish Ranch Road Safety Improvements
Start of Project
End of Project
Acquire 6' r/w
Retaining structure
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number NL2
Project Name:San Pablo Dam Road Safety Improvements
Project Location:San Pablo Dam Rd from Camino Pablo to west of Old San Pablo Dam Rd (Central AOB Boundary)
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Aug. 28, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and grubbing 9225 SF $3.00 27,675$
2 Earthwork 9225 SF $8.00 73,800$
3 Class 2 Aggregate Base 683 CY $65.00 44,417$
4 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)304 Ton $125.00 38,053$
5 Retaining wall 3500 SF $85.00 297,500$
6 Install concrete median barrier 1400 LF $75.00 105,000$
7 Install rumble strips (both shoulders)2800 LF $0.60 1,680$
8 Striping 5600 LF $3.00 16,800$
9 Misc. drainage modifications 1 LS $90,700.00 90,700$
1.Subtotal:695,625$
10 Clearing and grubbing 6000 SF $3.00 18,000$
11 Earthwork 6000 SF $8.00 48,000$
12 Class 2 Aggregate Base 444 CY $65.00 28,889$
13 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)198 Ton $125.00 24,750$
14 Retaining wall 1750 SF $85.00 148,750$
15 Remove existing median 750 LF $15.00 11,250$
16 Install concrete median barrier 750 LF $75.00 56,250$
17 Install rumble strips (both shoulders)1500 LF $0.60 900$
18 Striping 3000 LF $3.00 9,000$
19 Misc. drainage modifications 1 LS $51,900.00 51,900$
2.Subtotal:397,689$
20 Clearing and grubbing 2400 LS $3.00 7,200$
21 Earthwork 2400 SF $8.00 19,200$
22 Class 2 Aggregate Base 178 CY $65.00 11,556$
23 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)79 Ton $125.00 9,900$
24 Retaining wall 1500 SF $85.00 127,500$
25 Remove existing median 300 LF $15.00 4,500$
26 Install concrete median barrier 300 LF $75.00 22,500$
27 Install rumble strips (both shoulders)1160 LF $0.60 696$
28 Striping 1760 LF $3.00 5,280$
29 Misc. drainage modifications 1 LS $31,200.00 31,200$
3.Subtotal:239,532$
3.Old San Pablo Dam Road to End of Existing Median (L=580')
5740
1.Bear Creek Road to start of existing median (L=1400')
2.Start of Existing Median to Old San Pablo Dam Road (L=750')
The project will enhance safety by widening and converting the roadway to a fully
divided highway with bicycle improvements. The project is assumed to construct a
median with concrete curb, where it doesn't already exist, and install rumble strips.
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
30 Clearing and grubbing 17460 LS $3.00 52,380$
31 Earthwork 17460 SF $4.00 69,840$
32 Class 2 Aggregate Base 1293 CY $65.00 84,067$
33 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)576 Ton $125.00 72,023$
34 Retaining wall 4000 SF $85.00 340,000$
35 Install concrete median barrier 2910 LF $75.00 218,250$
36 Install rumble strips (both shoulders)5820 LF $0.60 3,492$
37 Striping 8730 LF $3.00 26,190$
38 Misc. drainage modifications 1 LS $129,900.00 129,900$
4.Subtotal:996,141$
39 Signage 1 LS $2,000.00 2,000$
40 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $58,200.00 58,200$
41 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
42 Mobilization 1 LS 239,500.00$ 239,500$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)2,395,000$
Project Number NL2
Planning Engineering (TE)360,000$ Contract Items 2,634,500$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*659,000$ Other Costs (CON)396,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)60,000$ Contingency*659,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)410,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)3,689,500$
R/W Engineering (Survey)-$ Subtotal (Plan)360,000$
Real Property Labor -$ Subtotal (PE)1,129,000$
R/W Acquisition -$ Subtotal (R/W)-$
Construction Engineering *396,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)1,885,000$
Grand Total 5,178,500$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 25% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)6,073,000$
4.End of Existing Median to AOB Boundary (L=2910')
Project NL2: San Pablo Dam Road Safety Improvements
End of Project
Start of Project
Existing median
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number NL5
Project Name:Bear Creek Road/Happy Valley Road Intersection Safety Improvements
Project Location:Bear Creek Road and Happy Valley Road
Description
Project Length (ft):N/A
Date of Estimate:Aug. 28, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Install R1-1 Sign with enhanced conspicuity 1 EA 500.00$ 500$
2 Stripe new pavement legends 1 LS 1,000.00$ 1,000$
3 Mobilization 1 LS 200.00$ 200$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)2,000$
Project Number NL5
Planning Engineering (TE)-$ Contract Items 2,200$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*15,000$ Other Costs (CON)-$
Utility Coordination (Design)-$ Contingency*1,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)-$ Subtotal (Contract Items)3,200$
R/W Engineering (Survey)-$ Subtotal (Plan)-$
Real Property Labor -$ Subtotal (PE)15,000$
R/W Acquisition -$ Subtotal (R/W)-$
Construction Engineering *-$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)15,000$
Grand Total 18,200$
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items.Current Year 2015
Escalation Year 2021
Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)21,000$
Project will implement all-way stop control (AWSC) at the intersection. Enhanced conspicuity
stop signs are recommended for the approaches that are currently uncontrolled.
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project NL5: Bear Creek Road/Happy Valley Road Intersection Safety Improvements
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number SL1
Project Name:Pinehurst Road and Canyon Road Bicycle Improvements
Project Location:Canyon Road from the Lafayette/Moraga Regional Trail to Pinehurst Road
and Pinehurst Road from Canyon Road to the Alameda County line
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Sep. 2, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C.Shew Revised by
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
A Clearing and grubbing 1 LS $2,500.00 2,500$
B Earthwork 320 SF $10.00 3,200$
C Class 2 Aggregate Base 24 CY $65.00 1,541$
D Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)11 Ton $125.00 1,320$
E Retaining wall 56 LF $250.00 14,000$
F Striping 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
G Signage 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
H Misc. drainage modifications 1 LS $7,400.00 7,400$
Subtotal Per Turnout:31,960$
1 Canyon Road Bike Turnouts 2 EA 31,960$ 63,920$
2 Pinehurst Road Bike Turnouts 15 EA 31,960$ 479,400$
3 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $54,300.00 54,300$
4 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $12,000.00 12,000$
5 Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation 1 LS $25,000.00 25,000$
6 Mobilization and re-mobilization 1 LS 127,000.00$ 127,000$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)635,000$
Project Number SL1
Planning Engineering (TE)100,000$ Contract Items 762,000$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*305,000$ Other Costs (CON)115,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)50,000$ Contingency*191,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)160,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)1,068,000$
R/W Engineering (Survey)-$ Subtotal (Plan)100,000$
Real Property Labor -$ Subtotal (PE)515,000$
R/W Acquisition/ Temp. Construction Easements -$ Subtotal (R/W)-$
Construction Engineering *115,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)730,000$
Grand Total 1,683,000$
*Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
*Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 25% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)1,974,000$
Canyon Road (2 turnouts) and Pinehurst Road (15 bike turnouts)
The project will construct bike turnouts/rest stops every half-mile (on each side of the road)
along a large portion of Canyon Road and Pinehurst Road. The turnouts would be staggered
such that there is one every quarter mile (looking at both sides of the road). Widening the
roadway shoulders to add bike lanes was considered, but decided infeasible due to
environmental concerns over the protected watershed.
3380 feet (on Canyon Road); 20750 feet (on Pinehurst Road)
Estimated Cost per Bike Rest Area/Turnout
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project SL1: Pinehurst Road and Canyon Road Bicycle Improvements
Project segments
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number EC2
Project Name:Ayers Road/Concord Boulevard Intersection Improvements
Project Location:Ayers Road and Concord Boulevard
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Jul. 6, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Earthwork 1275 SF $2.00 2,550$
2 Class 2 Aggregate Base 94 CY $65.00 6,139$
3 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)53 Ton $125.00 6,574$
4 Sidewalk 1275 SF $8.00 10,200$
5 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)1 EA $4,200.00 4,200$
6 Traffic signal modification (one quadrant)1 LS $100,000.00 100,000$
7 Restripe intersection approach 1 LS $2,500.00 2,500$
8 Install curb & gutter 75 LF $35.00 2,625$
9 Signage 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
10 Clearing and grubbing 1 LS $30,000.00 30,000$
11 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $13,600.00 13,600$
12 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
13 Mobilization 1 LS 18,500.00$ 18,500$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)185,000$
Project Number EC2
Planning Engineering (TE)30,000$ Contract Items 203,500$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*100,000$ Other Costs (CON)41,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)30,000$ Contingency*31,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)30,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)275,500$
R/W Engineering (Survey)30,000$ Subtotal (Plan)30,000$
Real Property Labor 50,000$ Subtotal (PE)160,000$
R/W Acquisition 18,150$ Subtotal (R/W)98,150$
Construction Engineering *41,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)329,150$
Grand Total 563,650$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)661,000$
Project would add a southbound right turn lane to address an LOS deficiency. Some right of
way would be needed. Sidewalk will need to be realigned at the northwest corner of the
intersection.
75
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project EC2: Ayers Road/Concord Boulevard Intersection Improvements
New sidewalk
Relocate traffic
signal pole
New right turn
lane
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number EC3
Project Name:Ayers Road/Laurel Drive Intersection Safety Improvements
Project Location:Ayers Road & Laurel Drive
Description
Project Length (ft):N/A
Date of Estimate:Aug. 28, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Install traffic signal with safety lighting 4 EA 100,000.00$ 400,000$
2 Earthwork 4350 SF $8.00 34,800$
3 Class 2 Aggregate Base 322 CY $65.00 20,944$
4 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)144 Ton $125.00 17,944$
5 Sidewalk 3010 SF 8.00$ 24,080$
6 Install curb and gutter 430 LF 35.00$ 15,050$
7 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)8 EA 4,200.00$ 33,600$
8 Removal of signs 1 LS 500.00$ 500$
9 Sandblast existing pavement legends 1 LS 1,000.00$ 1,000$
10 Thermoplastic striping for crosswalks 1 LS 2,000.00$ 2,000$
11 Restripe intersection approach 4 EA 2,500.00$ 10,000$
12 Temporary traffic control 1 LS 14,000.00$ 14,000$
13 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS 6,000.00$ 6,000$
14 Mobilization 1 LS 58,000.00$ 58,000$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)580,000$
Project Number EC3
Planning Engineering (TE)87,000$ Contract Items 638,000$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*217,000$ Other Costs (CON)96,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)60,000$ Contingency*96,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)60,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)830,000$
R/W Engineering (Survey)-$ Subtotal (Plan)87,000$
Real Property Labor -$ Subtotal (PE)337,000$
R/W Acquisition -$ Subtotal (R/W)-$
Construction Engineering *96,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)520,000$
Grand Total 1,254,000$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)1,471,000$
Project will widen the Ayers Road approach to the intersection with Laurel Drive, install new
curb, gutter, sidewalk, and ADA curb ramps, and install a traffic signal.
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project EC3: Ayers Road/Laurel Drive Intersection Safety Improvements
New curb, gutter,
and sidewalk
Widen roadway
Signalize
intersection
New curb, gutter,
and sidewalk
Widen roadway
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number EC4
Project Name:Bailey Road/Myrtle Drive Intersection Improvements
Project Location:Bailey Road and Myrtle Drive
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Jul. 6, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Earthwork 3500 SF $8.00 28,000$
2 Construct retaining wall 200 LF $200.00 40,000$
3 Class 2 Aggregate Base 259 CY $65.00 16,852$
4 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)173 Ton $125.00 21,656$
5 Striping 380 LF $5.00 1,900$
6 Signage 1 LS $1,500.00 1,500$
7 Clearing and grubbing 1 LS $30,000.00 30,000$
8 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $11,000.00 11,000$
9 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
10 Mobilization 1 LS 15,700.00$ 15,700$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)157,000$
Project Number EC4
Planning Engineering (TE)100,000$ Contract Items 172,700$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*150,000$ Other Costs (CON)35,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)30,000$ Contingency*26,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)30,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)233,700$
R/W Engineering (Survey)-$ Subtotal (Plan)100,000$
Real Property Labor -$ Subtotal (PE)210,000$
R/W Acquisition -$ Subtotal (R/W)-$
Construction Engineering *35,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)345,000$
Grand Total 543,700$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)638,000$
Project would add a 200' southbound left turn bay to enhance intersection operations and
safety. All of the widening would be on the west side. The southbound through lane would
flare out at the intersection with a 90' taper. Some power poles would have to be relocated.
380
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project EC4: Bailey Road/Myrtle Drive Intersection Improvements
New through lane
Stripe 200' of
existing pavement as
left turn pocket
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number EC6
Project Name:Bailey Road Shoulder
Project Location:Bailey Road from 290' north of Myrtle Drive to 300' south of Myrtle Drive
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Jul. 6, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Earthwork 5320 SF $8.00 42,560$
2 Class 2 Aggregate Base 394 CY $65.00 25,615$
3 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)176 Ton $125.00 21,945$
4 Striping 665 LF $3.00 1,995$
5 Signage 1 LS $1,500.00 1,500$
6 Clearing and grubbing 1 LS $30,000.00 30,000$
7 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $9,400.00 9,400$
8 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
9 Mobilization 1 LS 13,900.00$ 13,900$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)139,000$
Project Number EC6
Planning Engineering (TE)100,000$ Contract Items 152,900$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*150,000$ Other Costs (CON)31,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)30,000$ Contingency*23,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)30,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)206,900$
R/W Engineering (Survey)-$ Subtotal (Plan)100,000$
Real Property Labor -$ Subtotal (PE)210,000$
R/W Acquisition -$ Subtotal (R/W)-$
Construction Engineering *31,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)341,000$
Grand Total 516,900$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)606,000$
Project would widen Bailey Road to add an 8' shoulder to enhance vehicle and bicycle safety.
The earthwork and retaining wall costs that would be required north of Myrtle Drive are
assumed as part of Project EC4.
665
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project EC6: Bailey Road Shoulder
New 8' shoulder
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number CCC1
Project Name:Las Juntas Way/Coggins Drive Intersection Improvements
Project Location:Las Juntas Way and Coggins Drive
Description
Project Length (ft):N/A
Date of Estimate:Jul. 6, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Install traffic signal with safety lighting 4 EA 75,000.00$ 300,000$
2 Removal of signs 1 LS 500.00$ 500$
3 Sandblast existing pavement legends 1 LS 1,000.00$ 1,000$
4 Thermoplastic striping for crosswalks 1 LS 2,000.00$ 2,000$
5 Restripe intersection approach 4 EA 2,500.00$ 10,000$
6 Temporary traffic control 1 LS 8,000.00$ 8,000$
7 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 EA $6,000.00 6,000$
8 Mobilization 1 LS 32,800.00$ 32,800$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)328,000$
Project Number CCC1
Planning Engineering (TE)50,000$ Contract Items 360,800$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*123,000$ Other Costs (CON)73,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)40,000$ Contingency*55,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)30,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)488,800$
R/W Engineering (Survey)-$ Subtotal (Plan)50,000$
Real Property Labor -$ Subtotal (PE)193,000$
R/W Acquisition -$ Subtotal (R/W)-$
Construction Engineering *73,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)316,000$
Grand Total 731,800$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)858,000$
Project will signalize the intersection of Las Juntas Way and Coggins Drive.
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project CCC1: Las Juntas Way/Coggins Drive Intersection Improvements
New traffic signal
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number CCC2
Project Name:Buskirk Ave./Oak Road - Northbound I-680 Corridor Improvements
Project Location:Between Treat Boulevard and Oak Road
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Sep. 25, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Stripe third northbound lane 450 LF $3.00 1,350$
2 Modify pork chop and striping for westbound right 1 LS $7,500.00 7,500$
3 Sandblast existing striping 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
4 Stripe new pavement legends 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
5 Signage 1 LS $2,000.00 2,000$
6 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)2 EA $4,200.00 8,400$
1.Subtotal:21,250$
7 Demolish concrete islands 380 SF $7.00 2,660$
8 Earthwork 380 SF $2.00 760$
9 Class 2 Aggregate Base 28 CY $65.00 1,830$
10 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)13 Ton $125.00 1,568$
11 Relocate signal poles, controller, and service 1 LS $200,000.00 200,000$
12 Sandblast existing striping 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
13 Restripe intersection approach 3 EA $1,500.00 4,500$
14 Signage 1 LS $2,000.00 2,000$
15 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)1 EA $4,200.00 4,200$
2.Subtotal:206,817$
16 Demolish existing sidewalk 3780 SF $3.00 11,340$
17 Clear and remove existing landscaping 1 LS $30,000.00 30,000$
18 Earthwork 7560 SF $2.00 15,120$
19 Class 2 Aggregate Base 560 CY $65.00 36,400$
20 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)249 Ton $125.00 31,185$
21 Curb and gutter 630 LF $35.00 22,050$
22 Misc. drainage modifications 1 LS $29,200.00 29,200$
23 Sidewalk 3780 SF $8.00 30,240$
24 Striping 630 LF $3.00 1,890$
25 Reconstruct existing driveway 2 EA $5,000.00 10,000$
26 Relocate street light 3 EA $2,500.00 7,500$
27 Signage 1 LS $2,000.00 2,000$
28 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)2 EA $4,200.00 8,400$
3.Subtotal:235,325$
29 Demolish existing sidewalk 3000 SF $3.00 9,000$
30 Clear and remove existing landscaping 1 LS $30,000.00 30,000$
31 Earthwork 6000 SF $2.00 12,000$
The project will increase capacity for traffic on northbound Buskirk Avenue and Oak Road to
access northbound I-680. Improvements may be made on Buskirk Avenue or parallel
roadways.
4.Buskirk Avenue from the I-680 Northbound On-Ramp to Oak Road
1.Buskirk Avenue from Treat Boulevard to Wayne Drive (L=450 ft)
1850
2.Buskirk Avenue and Wayne Drive Intersection
3.Buskirk Avenue from Wayne Drive to the I-680 Northbound On-Ramp
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
32 Class 2 Aggregate Base 444 CY $65.00 28,889$
33 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)198 Ton $125.00 24,750$
34 Curb and gutter 500 LF $35.00 17,500$
35 Misc. drainage modifications 1 LS $24,400.00 24,400$
36 Sidewalk 3000 SF $8.00 24,000$
37 Striping 500 LF $3.00 1,500$
38 Relocate street light 2 EA $2,500.00 5,000$
39 Signage 1 LS $2,000.00 2,000$
4.Subtotal:179,039$
40 Clearing and grubbing 1 LS $30,000.00 30,000$
41 Earthwork 9500 SF $2.00 19,000$
42 Class 2 Aggregate Base 704 CY $65.00 45,741$
43 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)470 Ton $125.00 58,781$
44 Curb and gutter 500 LF $35.00 17,500$
45 Misc. drainage modifications 1 LS $34,200.00 34,200$
46 Striping 500 LF $6.00 3,000$
47 Install new street lights 2 EA $5,000.00 10,000$
48 Signage 1 LS $2,000.00 2,000$
5.Subtotal:220,222$
49 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $86,300.00 86,300$
50 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
51 Mobilization 1 LS 95,500.00$ 95,500$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)955,000$
Project Number CCC2
Planning Engineering (TE)144,000$ Contract Items 1,050,500$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*358,000$ Other Costs (CON)158,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)90,000$ Contingency*263,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)170,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)1,471,500$
R/W Engineering (Survey)50,000$ Subtotal (Plan)144,000$
Real Property Labor 120,000$ Subtotal (PE)618,000$
R/W Acquisition 150,000$ Subtotal (R/W)320,000$
Construction Engineering *158,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)1,240,000$
Grand Total 2,553,500$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 25% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)2,995,000$
5.Buskirk Avenue Connection to Oak Road On-Ramp to I-680 North, and On-Ramp Modifications
Project CCC2: Buskirk Ave./Oak Road - Northbound I-680 Corridor Improvements
Restripe northbound
departure for three lanes
Demolish concrete island to
carry third northbound
through lane
Widen roadway on east side
for third northbound lane
and reconstruct s/w
Relocate signal equipment
Modify pork chop island and
striping to make westbound
right traffic come into its
own lane Buskirk AveTreat Blvd
Project CCC2: Buskirk Ave./Oak Road - Northbound I-680 Corridor Improvements
Construct new connection to
I-680 NB on-ramp
Realign existing I-680 NB on-
ramp and widen to two
lanes
Widen roadway on east side
for second NB lane and
reconstruct s/w
Shift existing right turn
pocket to the east. R/W
required.Buskirk Ave
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number CCC3
Project Name:Treat Boulevard Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Project Location:Treat Boulevard from Main Street to Jones Road
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Jul. 6, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Demolish existing pork chop island 675 SF $3.00 2,025$
2 New pork chop island 500 SF $7.00 3,500$
3 Shorten median nose 20 LF $10.00 200$
4 Sandblast existing striping 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
5 Stripe high-visibility crosswalk 5 EA $1,500.00 7,500$
6 Stripe sharrow 9 EA $250.00 2,250$
7 Stripe set-back limit line 400 LF $3.00 1,200$
8 Stripe two-stage turn waiting area 2 EA $1,000.00 2,000$
9 Modify traffic signal to add bicycle signal heads 1 LS $100,000.00 100,000$
10 Reconstruct retaining wall at bicycle waiting area 75 LF $200.00 15,000$
11 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)10 EA $4,200.00 42,000$
12 Earthwork and clear landscaping 400 SF $2.00 800$
13 Widen southwest sidewalk 400 SF $8.00 3,200$
1.Subtotal:180,675$
14 Sandblast existing striping 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
15 Restripe to narrow lanes 2370 LF $3.00 7,110$
16 Stripe sharrow 2 EA $250.00 500$
17 Demolish existing asphalt 4620 SF $3.00 13,860$
18 Widen north sidewalk to 12'4620 SF $8.00 36,960$
19 New curb and gutter 660 LF $35.00 23,100$
20 Earthwork and clear landscaping 1925 SF $2.00 3,850$
21 Construct 7' south sidewalk 3885 SF $8.00 31,080$
22 Stripe high-visibility crosswalk 1 EA $1,500.00 1,500$
23 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)2 EA $4,200.00 8,400$
2.Subtotal:127,360$
24 Demolish existing pork chop island 660 SF $3.00 1,980$
25 New pork chop island 320 SF $8.00 2,560$
26 Sandblast existing striping 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
27 Stripe high-visibility crosswalk 5 EA $1,500.00 7,500$
28 Install raised crosswalk 1 EA $5,000.00 5,000$
The project will provide for two-way bicycle travel along the north side of Treat Boulevard and
enhance pedestrian travel on the south side. High visibility “ladder” type crosswalk striping,
yield lines and signs would be provided at the channelized right-turns. All curb ramps would
be replaced to meet ADA standards. Removing the southbound channelized right turn at Oak
Road and Jones Road will eliminate the weaving of westbound motorists between Oak Road
and the I-680 ramps, improving traffic operations and safety. In order to prevent queuing
issues, a double southbound right turn will be implemented at this location, and the travel
lanes shifted eastward. Additional features include traffic signal hardware upgrades and
bicycle signal heads at some locations, as well as a bicycle waiting area and the intersection of
Treat Boulevard and Main Street.
N/A
1.Treat Boulevard and Main Street
2.Treat Boulevard from Main Street to Buskirk Avenue
3.Treat Boulevard and Buskirk Avenue
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
29 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)10 EA $4,200.00 42,000$
30
Upgrade signal hardware (or relocate Type 1-B
pole)1 LS $10,000.00 10,000$
3.Subtotal:70,040$
31 Restripe ex. 10' sidewalk for two-way shared use 420 LF $3.00 1,260$
32 Bike ramp from sidewalk to slip lane 1 EA $3,000.00 3,000$
33 Restripe slip lane to two-way bike lane 200 LF $3.00 600$
34 Demolish asphalt 800 SF $3.00 2,400$
35 Install planter to close slip lane access 800 SF $10.00 8,000$
36 Curb and gutter 100 LF $35.00 3,500$
37 Add "bikes yield to pedestrians" signs 2 EA $500.00 1,000$
38 Stripe sharrow 9 EA $250.00 2,250$
4.Subtotal:22,010$
39 Modify traffic signal to add bicycle signal heads 1 LS $100,000.00 100,000$
40 Relocate mast arm signal at NW pork chop 1 EA $100,000.00 100,000$
41 Relocate mast arm signal at NE pork chop 1 EA $100,000.00 100,000$
42 Lengthen mast arm signal at SW quadrant 1 EA $100,000.00 100,000$
43 Sandblast existing striping 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
44 Stripe high-visibility crosswalk 4 EA $1,500.00 6,000$
45 Demolish existing pork chop island on NE corner 350 SF $3.00 1,050$
46
Extend NW corner pork chop to create one-way bike
lane 1500 SF $8.00 12,000$
47 New curb and gutter for one-way bike lane 250 LF $35.00 8,750$
48 Stripe one-way bike lane 300 LF $3.00 900$
49 New curb and gutter on NE corner 300 LF $35.00 10,500$
50 Restripe intersection approach for bike bays 3 EA $2,500.00 7,500$
51 Stripe sharrow 9 EA $250.00 2,250$
52 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)10 EA $4,200.00 42,000$
53 Demolish median on SB Oak approach 2200 SF $3.00 6,600$
54 Cut back median nose on east leg 50 LF $20.00 1,000$
55 Demolish existing sidewalk, curb & gutter (NE corner 2800 SF $3.00 8,400$
56 New landscaped median 200 LF $100.00 20,000$
57 Earthwork 3600 SF $2.00 7,200$
58 Class 2 Aggregate Base 267 CY $65.00 17,333$
59 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)178 Ton $125.00 22,275$
60 Restripe roadway 1000 LF $3.00 3,000$
61 New south sidewalk 1200 SF $8.00 9,600$
5.Subtotal:587,358$
62 Stripe sharrow 7 EA $250.00 1,750$
63 Sandblast existing striping 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
64 Restripe westbound right lane 150 LF $3.00 450$
6.Subtotal:3,200$
65 Stripe sharrow 2 EA $250.00 500$
66 Sandblast existing striping 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
67 Stripe high-visibility crosswalk 6 EA $1,500.00 9,000$
7.Subtotal:10,500$
68 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $99,100.00 99,100$
69 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
70 Mobilization 1 LS 110,600.00$ 110,600$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)1,106,000$
Project Number CCC3
Planning Engineering (TE)277,000$ Contract Items 1,216,600$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*487,000$ Other Costs (CON)183,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)100,000$ Contingency*183,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)150,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)1,582,600$
7.Treat Boulevard and Jones Road
5.Treat Boulevard and Oak Road
6.Treat Boulevard from Oak Road to Jones Road
4.Treat Boulevard from Buskirk Avenue to Oak Road
R/W Engineering (Survey)-$ Subtotal (Plan)277,000$
Real Property Labor -$ Subtotal (PE)737,000$
R/W Acquisition -$ Subtotal (R/W)-$
Construction Engineering *183,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)1,197,000$
Grand Total 2,596,600$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)3,045,000$
Project CCC3: Treat Boulevard Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
Project CCC3: Treat Boulevard Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Widen southbound
approach for dual SBR and
shift lanes east
Project CCC3: Treat Boulevard Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number CCC4
Project Name:Treat Boulevard Bicycle Improvements (east of Jones Road)
Project Location:Treat Boulevard from Jones Road to the Walnut Creek Bridge
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Jul. 6, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B.Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Relocate traffic signal equipment (one quadrant)2 EA $100,000.00 200,000$
2 Demolish existing median and landscaping 6000 SF $5.00 30,000$
3 Demolish south side sidewalk 8820 SF $3.00 26,460$
4 New concrete median with landscaping 980 LF $80.00 78,400$
5 New south sidewalk 7840 LF $8.00 62,720$
6 Earthwork 9800 SF $2.00 19,600$
7 Class 2 Aggregate Base 726 CY $65.00 47,185$
8 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)485 Ton $125.00 60,638$
9 Relocate signs and bus stop bench 1 LS $10,000.00 10,000$
10 Restripe roadway 980 LF $25.00 24,500$
1.Subtotal:559,503$
11 Relocate traffic signal equipment (one quadrant)2 EA $100,000.00 200,000$
12 Narrow existing median and repair landscaping 370 LF $50.00 18,500$
13 Demolish south side sidewalk 3600 SF $3.00 10,800$
14 Earthwork 6000 SF $2.00 12,000$
15 Class 2 Aggregate Base 444 CY $65.00 28,889$
16 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)297 Ton $125.00 37,125$
17 New south sidewalk 3600 SF $8.00 28,800$
18 Stripe bike lanes 600 LF $12.00 7,200$
2.Subtotal:343,314$
19 Signage 1 LS $5,000.00 5,000$
20 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $45,100.00 45,100$
21 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
22 Mobilization 1 LS 95,900.00$ 95,900$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)959,000$
Project Number CCC4
Planning Engineering (TE)144,000$ Contract Items 1,054,900$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*500,000$ Other Costs (CON)159,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)50,000$ Contingency*211,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)90,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)1,424,900$
R/W Engineering (Survey)50,000$ Subtotal (Plan)144,000$
Real Property Labor 120,000$ Subtotal (PE)640,000$
R/W Acquisition 500,000$ Subtotal (R/W)670,000$
Construction Engineering *159,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)1,613,000$
Grand Total 2,878,900$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 20% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)3,376,000$
Project would add 5' Class II bike lanes along Treat Boulevard from Jones Road to the Walnut
Creek Bridge. This would be accomplished by narrowing the existing median and taking
frontage where necessary.
N/A
1.Treat Boulevard from Jones Road to Cherry Lane (L=980 ft)
2.Treat Boulevard from Cherry Lane to Walnut Creek Bridge (L=600')
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project CCC4: Treat Boulevard Bicycle Improvements (east of Jones Road)
Widen 10' to the south
within existing ROW
Reconstruct median to
shift lanes south
Widen 10' to the south by
acquiring new ROW
Widen 5' to the north
by narrowing median
Widen 5' to the north by
acquiring new ROW
Widen 5' to the south by
acquiring new ROW
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number CCC6
Project Name:Treat Boulevard/Jones Road Intersection Improvements
Project Location:Treat Boulevard and Jones Road
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Jul. 6, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Demolish concrete median 240 LF $10.00 2,400$
2 Demolish existing pork chop island 500 SF $3.00 1,500$
3 Traffic signal modification (one quadrant)1 LS $100,000.00 100,000$
4 Demolish existing 10' sidewalk 3000 SF $3.00 9,000$
5 Clear existing landscaping 1000 SF $2.00 2,000$
6 Earthwork 5040 SF $2.00 10,080$
7 Class 2 Aggregate Base 373 CY $65.00 24,267$
8 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)131 Ton $125.00 16,335$
9 New concrete median with landscaping 240 LF $80.00 19,200$
10 New pork chop island 500 SF $8.00 4,000$
11 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)4 EA $4,200.00 16,800$
12 Relocate street lights 5 EA $2,000.00 10,000$
13 New 10' sidewalk 3000 SF $8.00 24,000$
14 Striping 960 LF $3.00 2,880$
1.Subtotal:242,462$
15 Demolish existing pork chop island 200 SF $3.00 600$
16 Traffic signal modification (one quadrant)1 LS $100,000.00 100,000$
17 Demolish existing 10' sidewalk 1750 SF $3.00 5,250$
18 Clear existing landscaping 1000 SF $2.00 2,000$
19 Earthwork 2700 SF $2.00 5,400$
20 Class 2 Aggregate Base 200 CY $65.00 13,000$
21 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)191 Ton $125.00 23,822$
22 New pork chop island 200 SF $8.00 1,600$
23 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)4 EA $4,200.00 16,800$
24 Relocate street lights 1 EA $2,000.00 2,000$
25 New 10' sidewalk 1750 SF $8.00 14,000$
26 Striping 1050 LF $3.00 3,150$
2.Subtotal:187,622$
27 Signage 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
28 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $43,000.00 43,000$
On the southbound approach, the project would add an additional southbound left turn bay
to enhance intersection operations. This would be accomplished by shifting the two
northbound departure lanes and sidewalk to the east. This cost estimate assumes that the
pedestrian overcrossing would not be affected. If there is not adequate clearance under the
overcrossing for the channelized eastbound right turn lane, the bridge would have to be
raised; this would add additional cost that is not accounted for in this estimate. New right of
way would be required, but the affected parcel is owned by the County.
On the northbound approach, the project would add a separate northbound right turn lane to
enhance intersection operations. This would be accomplished by shifting the southbound
departure lane and sidewalk to the west. This requires a small amount of right of way from
parcel 172-020-046.
N/A
1.Southbound Approach
2.Northbound Approach
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
29 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
30 Mobilization 1 LS 48,000.00$ 48,000$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)480,000$
Project Number CCC6
Planning Engineering (TE)72,000$ Contract Items 528,000$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*180,000$ Other Costs (CON)80,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)40,000$ Contingency*80,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)60,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)688,000$
R/W Engineering (Survey)50,000$ Subtotal (Plan)72,000$
Real Property Labor 75,000$ Subtotal (PE)280,000$
R/W Acquisition 65,000$ Subtotal (R/W)190,000$
Construction Engineering *80,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)622,000$
Grand Total 1,230,000$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)1,442,000$
Project CCC6: Treat Boulevard/Jones Road Intersection Improvements (Southbound Approach)
New left turn lane
Shifted northbound lanes
Shifted sidewalk
Shifted pork chop
Jones Rd
Project CCC6: Treat Boulevard/Jones Road Intersection Improvements (Northbound Approach)
Restripe as right
turn lane
Shifted southbound lane
Shifted sidewalk
Shifted pork chop
Restripe as through
lane
Restripe as left turn
laneJones Rd
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number CCC8
Project Name:Mayhew Way Pedestrian Safety Improvements
Project Location:Mayhew Way from Buskirk Avenue to Bancroft Road
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Sep. 1, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Clearing and grubbing 1 LS $30,000.00 30,000$
2 Earthwork 3700 SF $2.00 7,400$
3 Class 2 Aggregate Base 274 CY $65.00 17,815$
4 Sidewalk 3700 SF $8.00 29,600$
5 Curb and gutter 740 LF $35.00 25,900$
6 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)5 EA $4,200.00 21,000$
7 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $13,200.00 13,200$
8 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
9 Mobilization 1 LS 15,100.00$ 15,100$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)151,000$
Project Number CCC8
Planning Engineering (TE)100,000$ Contract Items 166,100$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*150,000$ Other Costs (CON)34,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)30,000$ Contingency*25,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)30,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)225,100$
R/W Engineering (Survey)50,000$ Subtotal (Plan)100,000$
Real Property Labor 120,000$ Subtotal (PE)210,000$
R/W Acquisition 137,500$ Subtotal (R/W)307,500$
Construction Engineering *34,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)651,500$
Grand Total 842,600$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)988,000$
The project will complete gaps in the sidewalk network along Mayhew Way, where the
County has frontage. These locations include: 200’ west of Oberon Drive to 190’ West of
Woodlawn Drive (both sides), from 190’ West of Woodlawn Drive to 25’ East of the Iron
Horse Trail Crossing (south side), and from 25’ East of the trail crossing to Bancroft Road
(north side). Right-of-way would need to be acquired for the both segments of the north side
sidewalk.
740
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project CCC8: Mayhew Way Pedestrian Safety Improvements
County frontage on both sides of street
County frontage on south side of street
County frontage on north side of street
New s/w, curb,
and gutter
New s/w, curb,
and gutter
Mayhew Way
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number SWC2
Project Name:Olympic Boulevard/Tice Valley Road Intersection Improvements
Project Location:Olympic Boulevard and Tice Valley Road/Boulevard Way
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Jul. 6, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Demolish existing pork chop island 200 SF $3.00 600$
2 Traffic signal modification (one quadrant)1 LS $100,000.00 100,000$
3 Demolish existing 10' sidewalk 2000 SF $3.00 6,000$
4 Clear existing landscaping 1000 SF $2.00 2,000$
5 Earthwork 3000 SF $2.00 6,000$
6 Class 2 Aggregate Base 222 CY $65.00 14,444$
7 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)208 Ton $125.00 25,988$
8 New pork chop island 200 SF $7.00 1,400$
9 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)4 EA $4,200.00 16,800$
10 Relocate street lights 1 EA $2,000.00 2,000$
11 New 10' sidewalk 2000 SF $8.00 16,000$
12 Roadway striping 1100 LF $3.00 3,300$
13 Restripe crosswalks 1 LS $2,000.00 2,000$
14 Signage 1 LS $2,000.00 2,000$
15 Temporary traffic control 1 LS $19,900.00 19,900$
16 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
17 Mobilization 1 LS 22,400.00$ 22,400$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)224,000$
Project Number SWC2
Planning Engineering (TE)100,000$ Contract Items 246,400$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*175,000$ Other Costs (CON)50,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)30,000$ Contingency*37,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)30,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)333,400$
R/W Engineering (Survey)50,000$ Subtotal (Plan)100,000$
Real Property Labor 75,000$ Subtotal (PE)235,000$
R/W Acquisition 100,000$ Subtotal (R/W)225,000$
Construction Engineering *50,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)610,000$
Grand Total 893,400$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)1,048,000$
Project would add a second northbound left turn lane to enhance intersection operations.
This would be accomplished by widening the northbound approach to the east. This requires
a small amount of right of way from parcel 184-311-030.
N/A
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project SWC2: Olympic Boulevard/Tice Valley Road Intersection Improvements
New sidewalk
Restripe crosswalks
Shifted northbound
right turn lane
Shifted northbound
through lane
New second
northbound left turn
lane
Existing property
lineTice Valley Blvd
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number SWC3
Project Name:Pedestrian Bridge over Las Trampas Creek
Project Location:Between Dewing Lane and So. Villa Way
Description
Project Length (ft):
Date of Estimate:Jul. 6, 2015 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Demolish existing fence 1 LS $500.00 500$
2 Clearing and grubbing 1 LS $30,000.00 30,000$
3 Earthwork 2240 SF $2.00 4,480$
4 Class 2 Aggregate Base 166 CY $65.00 10,785$
5 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)55 Ton $125.00 6,930$
6 14' Bike/Pedestrian Bridge over creek 1820 SF $1,500.00 2,730,000$
7 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)1 EA $4,200.00 4,200$
8 Striping 290 LF $9.00 2,610$
9 Signage 1 LS $1,000.00 1,000$
10 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS $6,000.00 6,000$
11 Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation 1 LS $25,000.00 25,000$
12 Mobilization 1 LS 282,200.00$ 282,200$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)2,822,000$
Project Number SWC3
Planning Engineering (TE)424,000$ Contract Items 3,104,200$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*621,000$ Other Costs (CON)466,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)280,000$ Contingency*777,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)300,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)4,347,200$
R/W Engineering (Survey)50,000$ Subtotal (Plan)424,000$
Real Property Labor 75,000$ Subtotal (PE)1,201,000$
R/W Acquisition 300,000$ Subtotal (R/W)425,000$
Construction Engineering *466,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)2,516,000$
Grand Total 6,397,200$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2015
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 25% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 17.3%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)7,502,000$
Project would construct a 14' Class 1 path from Dewing Lane to S. Villa Way. This would include
approximately 160' of at-grade path and an approximately 130' bridge over Las Trampas Creek.
It is estimated this project would take 2 open parking spaces from the South Villa
Condominiums.
N/A
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project SWC3: Pedestrian Bridge over Las Trampas Creek
New r/w
Existing r/w
New Class I path
bridge (14' wide,
130' long)
New Class I path
(14' wide)
Transportation Engineering Planning Cost Estimate
Contra Costa County Public Works Department SWC4
Project Name:Tice Valley Blvd Pedestrian and Bicycle Project
Alternative:Class I Path along north side and sidewalk on south side of Tice Valley Blvd
Project Location:Tice Valley Blvd between the Walnut Creek City Limits and 200' East of Tice Hollow Ct
Assumptions:R=5 , TI=6.5
Project Length (ft):2,320
Date of Estimate:Oct. 6, 2015 Revision No.0
Revision Date
Prepared by:Tianjun Cao Revised by
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Construction Area Signs 12 EA 550.00$ 6,600$
2 Traffic Control System 1 LS 100,000.00$ 100,000$
3 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS 30,000.00$ 30,000$
4 Remove Tree 4 EA 2,000.00$ 8,000$
5 Saw Cut Pavement Edges 4640 LF 2.00$ 9,280$
6 Roadway Excavation 5564 CY 45.00$ 250,380$
7 Class 2 Aggregate Base 9013 TON 30.00$ 270,390$
8 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)1610 TON 110.00$ 177,100$
9 Roadside Sign 15 EA 500.00$ 7,500$
11 Guard Rail-End Anchor Assembly 8 EA 3,250.00$ 26,000$
12 Metal Beam Guard Railing (Wood Post)250 LF 115.00$ 28,750$
13 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe - SF (Bike symbols)220 SF 5.00$ 1,100$
14 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe - LF 4700 LF 2.00$ 9,400$
15 Striping Removal 4700 LF 1.50$ 7,050$
16 Sidewalk Removal (Obliteration)2000 SF 0.24$ 480$
17 Mailbox Removal and Replacement 20 EA 200.00$ 4,000$
18 Bridge 1 EA 200,000.00$ 200,000$
19 ADA Curb Ramp 6 EA 3,500.00$ 21,000$
20 Driveway Conform 19 EA 4,000.00$ 76,000$
21 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk)11600 SF 10.00$ 116,000$
22 Hot Mix Asphalt Dike 2320 LF 25.00$ 58,000$
23 Bridge Widening 1 LS 1,000,000.00$ 1,000,000$
Drainage
24 Concrete V-Ditch 50 LF 75.00$ 3,750$
25 Earthen Ditch (5' top, 2' bottom, 2:1 sides)1167 CY 45.00$ 52,500$
26 Culvert Alteration 1 EA 5,000.00$ 5,000$
27 Mobilization 1 LS 247,000.00$ 247,000$
OTHER COSTS BY PHASE:CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)2,468,000$
OTHER COSTS BY PHASE:
PLAN Planning Engineering (TE)100,000$ CONTRACT ITEMS 2,715,000$
PE Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*842,000$ OTHER COSTS (CON)458,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)100,000$ CONTINGENCY*408,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)100,000$ SUBTOTAL (CON)3,581,000$
R/W R/W Engineering (Survey)50,000$ SUBTOTAL (PLAN)100,000$
Real Property Labor 75,000$ SUBTOTAL (PE)1,042,000$
R/W Acquisition 100,000$ SUBTOTAL (R/W)225,000$
CON Construction Engineering *408,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees 50,000$ GRAND TOTAL 4,948,000$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)1,825,000$ CURRENT YEAR 2015
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)ESCALATION YEAR 2021
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)ESCALATION RATE 17.3%
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)$ 5,804,000
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
C
AS
T
L
E
G
L
E
N R
DTICE VALLEY BLVDTICE HOLLOW CTCOVENTRY CTMONTECILLO DRELLERY CTCE
NT
RAL COUNT
Y AOB
LI
MI
T
STICE VALLEY LNSCALE: 1" = 170'
255 GLACIER DRIVE MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333 FEDERAL ID NO.:DB:TC CB:MH DATE:OCT 2015 SHEET 1 OF 1
TICE VALLEY BLVD PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROJECT
PROJECT LAYOUT BRIDGELEGEND:
CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD
UTILITY POLE
RIGHT OF WAY LINE/PARCEL LINE
SIGN
2' TO 3' HIGH RETAINING WALL
TREE TO BE REMOVED
EX. SD INLET
CONC. CURB RAMP
DRIVEWAY CONFORM
COUNTY LIMITS
SHOULDER
EXISTING OR PROPOSED
CLASS I PATH/SIDEWALK
N
Transportation Engineering Planning Cost Estimate
Contra Costa County Public Works Department SWC 6
Project Name:Springbrook Road Pedestrian Improvement Project
Alternative:Sidewalk on entire north side and parts of south side of roadway
Project Location:Springbrook Rd from 170' East of Gilmore Ct to 460' East of Regency Ct
Assumptions:R, TI, etc.
Project Length (ft):3,000
Date of Estimate:Oct. 6, 2015 Revision No.0
Revision Date
Prepared by:Tianjun Cao Revised by
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Construction Area Signs 10 EA 550.00$ 5,500$
2 Traffic Control System 1 LS 50,000.00$ 50,000$
3 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS 6,000.00$ 6,000$
4 Remove Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe 6000 LF 2.00$ 12,000$
5 Minor Structure (Sidewalk Cross Drain)3 EA 600.00$ 1,800$
6 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS 30,000.00$ 30,000$
7 Remove Tree 3 EA 2,000.00$ 6,000$
8 Saw Cut Pavement Edges 4500 LF 2.00$ 9,000$
9 Roadway Excavation 1833 CY 45.00$ 82,485$
10 Imported Material (Shoulder Backing)420 TON 45.00$ 18,900$
11 Class 2 Aggregate Base 1995 TON 45.00$ 89,775$
12 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)3263 TON 110.00$ 358,930$
13 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk)23000 LF 10.00$ 230,000$
14 ADA Curb Ramp 6 EA 3,500.00$ 21,000$
15 Driveway Conform 42 EA 10,000.00$ 420,000$
16 Curb and Gutter 4500 LF 45.00$ 202,500$
17 Earthwork 355 CY 25.00$ 8,875$
18 Minor Concrete (Retaining Wall)270 LF 140.00$ 37,800$
19 Minor Structure (Inlet)5 EA 3,200.00$ 16,000$
20 Roadside Ditch 3000 LF 55.00$ 165,000$
21 C.3 Provisions and Misc. Drainage 1 LS 100,000.00$ 100,000$
22 Sign Relocation 10 EA 500.00$ 5,000$
23 Mailbox Removal and Replacement 30 EA 300.00$ 9,000$
24 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe - Det. 27B, Right Edge Line 6000 LF 2.00$ 12,000$
25 Mobilization 1 LS 190,000.00$ 190,000$
OTHER COSTS BY PHASE:
PLAN Planning Engineering (TE)250,000$ CONTRACT ITEMS 2,088,000$
PE Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*710,000$ OTHER COSTS (CON)364,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)20,000$ CONTINGENCY*314,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)150,000$ SUBTOTAL (CON)2,766,000$
R/W R/W Engineering (Survey)75,000$ SUBTOTAL (PLAN)250,000$
Real Property Labor 125,000$ SUBTOTAL (PE)880,000$
R/W Acquisition 1,000,000$ SUBTOTAL (R/W)1,200,000$
CON Construction Engineering *314,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees 50,000$ GRAND TOTAL 5,096,000$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)2,694,000$ CURRENT YEAR 2015
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)ESCALATION YEAR 2021
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)ESCALATION RATE 17.3%
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)TOTAL (in 2015 dollars)$ 5,976,000
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number SWC7
Project Name:Olympic Boulevard/Bridgefield Road Intersection Improvements
Project Location:Olympic Boulevard & Bridgefield Road
Description
Project Length (ft):N/A
Date of Estimate:Feb. 19, 2016 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:C. Shew Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Install traffic signal with safety lighting (approach)3 EA 100,000.00$ 300,000$
2 Sidewalk 600 SF 8.00$ 4,800$
3 Curb and gutter 90 LF 35.00$ 3,150$
4 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)2 EA 4,200.00$ 8,400$
5 Removal of signs 1 LS 500.00$ 500$
6 Sandblast existing pavement legends 1 LS 1,000.00$ 1,000$
7 Restripe intersection approach 3 EA 2,500.00$ 7,500$
8 Temporary traffic control 1 LS 8,000.00$ 8,000$
9 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS 6,000.00$ 6,000$
10 Mobilization 1 LS 33,900.00$ 33,900$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)339,000$
Project Number SWC7
Planning Engineering (TE)51,000$ Contract Items 372,900$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*130,000$ Other Costs (CON)75,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)30,000$ Contingency*56,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)30,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)503,900$
R/W Engineering (Survey)-$ Subtotal (Plan)51,000$
Real Property Labor -$ Subtotal (PE)190,000$
R/W Acquisition -$ Subtotal (R/W)-$
Construction Engineering *75,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees -$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)316,000$
Grand Total 744,900$
* Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2016
* Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 13.4%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)845,000$
Project will signalize the intersection of Olympic Boulevard and Bridgefield Road.
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
Project SWC7: Olympic Boulevard/Bridgefield Road Intersection Improvements
Install new
sidewalk, curb
and gutter
Install new traffic
signal
Olympic BlvdBridgefield Rd
DKS Associates Planning Cost Estimate
1970 Broadway Ste 740, Oakland CA 94612 Project Number SWC8
Project Name:Boulevard Way Sidewalk Project
Project Location:Boulevard Way between Warren Road and Olympic Boulevard
Description
Project Length (ft):2100
Date of Estimate:May. 24, 2016 Revision No.
Revision Date 4/15/2021
Prepared by:Tianjun Cao Revised by B. Sidhu
No.Description Quantity Units Unit Cost Total
1 Construction Area Signs 10 EA 550.00$ 5,500$
2 Traffic Control System 1 LS 50,000.00$ 50,000$
3 Prepare Water Pollution Control Plan 1 LS 6,000.00$ 6,000$
4 Remove Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe 2100 LF 3.00$ 6,300$
5 Minor Structure (Sidewalk Cross Drain)1 EA 600.00$ 600$
6 Clearing and Grubbing 1 LS 30,000.00$ 30,000$
7 Remove Tree 7 EA 2,000.00$ 14,000$
8 Saw Cut Pavement Edges 2100 LF 2.00$ 4,200$
9 Roadway Excavation 1283 CY 45.00$ 57,735$
10 Imported Material (Shoulder Backing)294 TON 45.00$ 13,230$
11 Class 2 Aggregate Base 1397 TON 45.00$ 62,865$
12 Hot Mix Asphalt (Type A)2284 TON 125.00$ 285,500$
13 Minor Concrete (Sidewalk)10500 SF 10.00$ 105,000$
14 ADA curb ramp (w/ detectable warning surface)8 EA 4,200.00$ 33,600$
15 Driveway Conform 3 EA 10,000.00$ 30,000$
16 Curb and gutter 2100 LF 45.00$ 94,500$
17 Earthwork 260 CY 25.00$ 6,500$
18 Minor Concrete (Retaining Wall)650 LF 200.00$ 130,000$
19 Minor Structure (Inlet)2 EA 3,200.00$ 6,400$
20 Metal Beam Guard Railing 100 LF 115.00$ 11,500$
21 Bridge Work 1 LS 200,000.00$ 200,000$
22 C.3 Provisions and Misc. Drainage 1 LS 70,000.00$ 70,000$
23 Sign Relocation 8 EA 500.00$ 4,000$
24 Mailbox Removal and Replacement 6 EA 300.00$ 1,800$
25 Relocate Fence 1 LS 2,000.00$ 2,000$
26 Thermoplastic Traffic Stripe - Det. 27B, Right Edge Li 2100 LF 2.00$ 4,200$
27 Mobilization 1 LS 124,000.00$ 124,000$
CONTRACT ITEMS LESS MOBILIZATION (TO NEAREST 1,000)1,235,000$
Project Number SWC8
Planning Engineering (TE)200,000$ Contract Items 1,359,000$
Preliminary Engineering (Design/Survey)*408,000$ Other Costs (CON)254,000$
Utility Coordination (Design)50,000$ Contingency*204,000$
Environmental (Environmental, Real Property)200,000$ Subtotal (Contract Items)1,817,000$
R/W Engineering (Survey)50,000$ Subtotal (Plan)200,000$
Real Property Labor 150,000$ Subtotal (PE)658,000$
R/W Acquisition 500,000$ Subtotal (R/W)700,000$
Construction Engineering *204,000$
Environmental Monitoring and Mitigation Fees 50,000$
SUBTOTAL of OTHER COSTS (ALL)1,812,000$
Grand Total 3,375,000$
*Preliminary Engineering is minimum 15% of contract items. (See Issues to Consider)Current Year 2016
*Construction Engineering is 15% of contract items. ($20,000 min.)Escalation Year 2021
* CONTINGENCY is 15% of contract items. ($10,000 min.)Escalation Factor 13.4%
TOTAL (in 2021 dollars)3,827,000$
Project will add sidewalk on the east side of the roadway.
Click here if this project is a surface treatment or overlay project.
Click here if the project schedule for this project is to be 50 days or more; also click here if this is a bridge project.
SCALE: 1" = 200' 255 GLACIER DRIVE MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 PH: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333FEDERAL ID NO.:DB:TCCB:MHDATE:NOV 2015SHEET1OF1BOULEVARD WAY PEDESTRIAN PROJECTPROJECT LAYOUT LEGEND:CENTER LINE OF THE ROADUTILITY POLERIGHT OF WAY LINE/PARCEL LINESIGN2' TO 3' HIGH RETAINING WALLTREE TO BE REMOVEDEX. SD INLETCONC. CURB RAMPSIDEWALKDRIVEWAY CONFORMCOUNTY LIMITSEDGE OF PAVEMENTEXISTING OR PROPOSED N
Description Cost(1)
2.2 Windtree Ct. to Newell Ct.
Widen existing path on north side to create 14 foot
sidepath; redesign of Newell Ct. intersection and
connections
$490,000
3 Newell Ct to Boulevard Way/Tice Valley Rd Extend continuous path or sidewalks along north side $613,556
4 Boulevard Way/Tice Valley Rd to Newell Ave
Continue the sidepath approximately 100 feet to
connect to Newell Avenue (may be included with Segment
5)
$632,000
5 Newell Ave to I-680
Expand the existing sidewalks fronting the Villa
townhome complex to create a 10 to 12 foot wide sidepath $1,661,000
Total (Year 2015) $3,397,000
Escalation Factor 17.27%
Total (Year 2021) $3,984,000
1) Costs for long-term projects for each segment
*Source: Olympic Corridor Connector Trail Study, June
Olympic Corridor Trail Connector - Summary of Estimated Costs*
Project #: SWC9
Segment
Olympic Boulevard Corridor Trail Connector Study Alta Planning + Design | B-3 B.4 Segment 2.2: Olympic Boulevard – Windtree Court to Newell CourtTable B-7: Short-Term Improvements Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS 5% $3,238 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS AND INSURANCE 1 LS 2% $1,295 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS 10% $6,475 Subtotal $11,008 Sitework, Demolition and Removal - includes all demolition, site preparation for all construction; relocation or re-setting of utilities; temporary construction fencing. Remove existing striping (no lead present) 8,840 LF $2.00 $17,680 Subtotal $17,680 Signs and Pavement Markings - includes painted traffic lines and markings on pavement, and traffic signage. High visibility crosswalk 155 LF $35.00 $5,425 Repaint stop bars and markings 3 EA $800.00 $2,400 Buffered bike lane, pavement markings, and signs 2,200 LF $7.58$16,676Miscellaneous 4" thermoplastic stripe 6,630 LF $3.00 $19,890 Wayfinding signage 2 EA $1,340.00 $2,680 Subtotal $47,071 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $75,759 CONTINGENCY 20% $15,152 SURVEYING 5% $3,788 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE 15% $11,364 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING/ADMIN. 15% $11,364 TOTAL $118,000 Table B-8: Long-Term Improvements Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS 5% $11,971 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS AND INSURANCE 1 LS 2% $4,788 EROSION CONTROL - INCLUDES ALL BMPS, SWPPP AND REPORTING 1 LS 5% $11,971 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS 10% $23,942 Subtotal $52,673 Sitework, Demolition and Removal - includes all demolition, site preparation for all construction; relocation or re-setting of utilities; temporary construction fencing. Sawcut pavement 1,161 LF $5.00 $5,805 Remove concrete pavement 100 SF $10.00$1,000Remove curb/gutter 1,161 LF $10.00$11,610Remove existing striping 6,966 LF $2.00$13,932Subtotal $32,347 Earthwork Clearing and grubbing 3,483 SF $0.25 $871 Subtotal $871
Final Report B-4 | Alta Planning + DesignDESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST COST Concrete Work and Asphalt Paving - includes concrete curbs, 4" PCC sidewalk, Type I pedestrian ramps, concrete pads, Sidepath Construct curb & gutter 1,161 LF $55.00 $63,855 Construct 4" PCC sidewalk 100 SF $15.00 $1,500 Construct 4" AC over 6" AB 1,1610 SF $10.00 $116,100 Construct wide curb ramp with truncated dome surface 4 EA $2,000.00 $8,000 Subtotal $189,455 Signs and Pavement Markings - includes painted traffic lines and markings on pavement, and traffic signage. Buffered bike lane and pavement markings 2,210 LF $7.58$16,752Subtotal $16,752 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $292,098 CONTINGENCY 20% $58,420 SURVEYING 5% $14,605 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEERING 15% $43,815 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION, PERMITTING 10% $29,210 TECH STUDIES, MITIGATION 2.5% $7,302 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING/ADMIN. 15% $43,814 TOTAL $490,000 Table B-9: Annual Maintenance Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT MAINTENANCE COST/YEAR TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST/YEAR Short-Term improvement Concept Bicycle Lanes and Bicycle Route Sweeping 2,200 LF $10 / 1,000 LF $22 Signs, Striping, and Pavement Markings $47,071 IC Installation Cost / 10 $4,707 Long-Term Improvement Concept Bicycle Lanes and Bicycle Route Sweeping 2,210 LF $10 / 1,000 LF $22 Signs, Striping, and Pavement Markings $16,752 IC Installation Cost / 10 $1,675 Sidepath Maintenance 1,178 LF $2652 / 1,000 LF $3,123 Sidepath Pavement Maintenance $116,100 IC Installation Cost / 20 $5,805 B.5 Segment 3: Olympic Boulevard – Newell Court to Boulevard Way/TiceValley Boulevard Table B-10: Short-Term Improvements Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS 5% $6,018 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS AND INSURANCE 1 LS 2% $2,407 EROSION CONTROL - INCLUDES ALL BMPS, SWPPP AND REPORTING 1 LS 2% $2,407 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS 10% $12,037 Subtotal $22,870 Sitework, Demolition and Removal - includes all demolition, site preparation for all construction; relocation or re-setting of utilities; temporary construction fencing. Sawcut pavement 160 LF $5.00 $800 Remove concrete pavement 48 SF $1.00 $48 Remove pavement markings 120 SF $7.00 $840 Remove existing striping (no lead present) 5,372 LF $2.00 $10,744 Subtotal $12,432 Concrete Work and Asphalt Paving - includes concrete curbs, 4" PCC sidewalk, Type I pedestrian ramps, concrete pads, Sidepath Construct AC curb 160 LF $12.00 $1,920 Construct 4" AC over 6" AB 320 SF $10.00 $3,200 Curb Ramp with truncated dome surface 4 EA $1,400.00 $5,600 Subtotal $10,720 Signs and Pavement Markings - includes painted traffic lines and markings on pavement, and traffic signage. High visibility crosswalk 371 LF $35.00 $12,985 Repaint stop bars and markings 5 EA $800.00 $4,000 Buffered bike lane, pavement markings, and signs 3,955 LF $7.58 $29,979 Bike lane, pavement markings, and signs 190 LF $5.25 $998 HAWK/RRFB 2 EA $22,250.00 $44,500 Wayfinding signage 2 EA $1,340.00 $2,680 Yield pavement marking 38 SF $7.00 $266 Green conflict markings 122 LF $14.81 $1,807 Subtotal $97,214 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $143,236 CONTINGENCY 20% $28,647 SURVEYING 5% $7,162 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE 15% $21,485 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING/ADMIN. 15% $21,485 TOTAL $223,000
Olympic Boulevard Corridor Trail Connector Study Alta Planning + Design | B-5 Table B-11: Long-Term Improvements Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS 5% $15,012 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS AND INSURANCE 1 LS 2% $6,005 EROSION CONTROL - INCLUDES ALL BMPS, SWPPP AND REPORTING 1 LS 5% $15,012 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS 10% $30,025 Subtotal $66,054 Sitework, Demolition and Removal - includes all demolition, site preparation for all construction; relocation or re-setting of utilities; temporary construction fencing. Sawcut pavement 1,170 LF $5.00 $5,850 Remove AC pavement 1,125 SF $0.80 $900 Remove concrete pavement 200 SF $10.00 $2,000 Remove existing storm drain culvert 1 EA $1,000.00 $1,000 Remove and relocate utility or signal cabinets (up to three) 2 EA $3,000.00 $6,000 Remove curb/gutter 1,170 LF $10.00 $11,700 Tree removal 11 EA $500.00 $5,500 Remove existing striping 1,170 LF $2.00 $2,340 Subtotal $35,290 Earthwork Clearing and grubbing 8,730 SF $0.25 $2,183 Subtotal $2,183 Concrete Work and Asphalt Paving - includes concrete curbs, 4" PCC sidewalk, Type I pedestrian ramps, concrete pads, Sidepath Construct curb & gutter 2,010 LF $55.00 $110,550 Construct 4" PCC sidewalk 9,855 SF $15.00 $147,825 Construct new inlet to existing storm drain 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000 Curb ramp with truncated dome surface 1 EA $1,400.00 $1,400 Subtotal $262,775 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $366,302 CONTINGENCY 20% $73,260 SURVEYING 5% $18,315 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEERING 15% $54,945 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION, PERMITTING 10% $36,630 TECH STUDIES, MITIGATION 2.5% $9,158 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING/ADMIN. 15% $54,945 TOTAL $613,556 Table B-12: Annual Maintenance Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT MAINTENANCE COST/YEAR TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST/YEAR Short-Term improvement Concept Bicycle Lanes and Bicycle Route Sweeping 3,955 LF $10 / 1,000 LF $40 Signs, Striping, and Pavement Markings $97,214 IC Installation Cost / 10 $9,721 Sidepath Maintenance 160 LF $2652 / 1,000 LF $424 Sidepath Pavement Maintenance $3,200 IC Installation Cost / 20 $160 Long-Term Improvement Concept Sidepath Maintenance 1,792 LF $2652 / 1,000 LF $4,752 Sidepath Pavement Maintenance $147,825 IC Installation Cost / 20 $7,391
Final Report B-6 | Alta Planning + DesignB.6 Segment 4: Olympic Boulevard – Boulevard Way/Tice Valley Boulevardto Newell Avenue Table B-13: Short-Term Improvements Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS 5% $17,042 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS AND INSURANCE 1 LS 2% $6,817 EROSION CONTROL - INCLUDES ALL BMPS, SWPPP AND REPORTING 1 LS 5% $17,042 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS 10% $34,083 Subtotal $74,983 Sitework, Demolition and Removal - includes all demolition, site preparation for all construction; relocation or re-setting of utilities; temporary construction fencing. Sawcut pavement 1,370 LF $5.00$6,850Remove AC pavement 8,780 SF $0.80$7,024Remove concrete pavement 560 SF $1.00$560Remove curb/gutter 1,370 LF $10.00 $13,700 Remove existing striping (no lead present) 2,740 LF $2.00 $5,480 Subtotal $33,614 Earthwork Soil for new landscape areas 152 CY $20.00 $3,040 Subtotal $3,040 Concrete Work and Asphalt Paving - includes concrete curbs, 4" PCC sidewalk, Type I pedestrian ramps, concrete pads, Sidepath Construct curb & gutter 1,390 LF $55.00 $76,450 Construct 4" AC over 6" AB 14,540 SF $10.00 $145,400 Curb Ramp with truncated dome surface 1 EA $1,400.00 $1,400 Subtotal $223,250 Planting Landscaping (1 gallon shrubs, 15 gallon trees, irrigation) 4,110 SF $6.50 $26,715 Irrigation meter/connection, backflow, and controller 1 EA $15,000.00 $15,000 Subtotal $41,715 Signs and Pavement Markings - includes painted traffic lines and markings on pavement, and traffic signage. Bike lane, pavement markings, and signs 5,138 LF $5.25 $26,972 Miscellaneous 4" thermoplastic stripe 2,740 LF $3.00 $8,220 Wayfinding signage 3 EA $1,340.00 $4,020 Subtotal $39,212 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $415,814 CONTINGENCY 20% $83,163 SURVEYING 5% $20,791 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE 15% $62,372 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING/ADMIN. 15% $62,372 TOTAL $645,000 Table B-14: Long-Term Improvements Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS 5% $15,445 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS AND INSURANCE 1 LS 2% $6,178 EROSION CONTROL - INCLUDES ALL BMPS, SWPPP AND REPORTING 1 LS 5% $15,445 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS 10% $30,890 Subtotal $67,958 Sitework, Demolition and Removal - includes all demolition, site preparation for all construction; relocation or re-setting of utilities; temporary construction fencing. Sawcut pavement 158 LF $5.00 $790 Remove AC pavement 13,020 SF $0.80 $10,416 Remove concrete pavement 200 SF $10.00 $2,000 Remove curb/gutter 158 LF $10.00 $1,580 Subtotal $14,786 Concrete Work and Asphalt Paving - includes concrete curbs, 4" PCC sidewalk, Type I pedestrian ramps, concrete pads, Sidepath Construct curb & gutter 158 LF $55.00 $8,690 Construct 4" PCC sidewalk 474 SF $15.00 $7,110 Construct 4" AC over 6" AB 21,700 SF $10.00 $217,000 Extend existing storm drain system 4 EA $1,000.00 $4,000 Subtotal $236,800 Planting Landscaping (1 gallon shrubs, 5 gallon shrubs, irrigation) 6,510 SF $6.50 $42,315 Irrigation meter/connection, backflow, and controller 1 EA $15,000.00 $15,000 Subtotal $57,315 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $376,859 CONTINGENCY 20% $75,372 SURVEYING 5% $18,843 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEERING 15% $56,529 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION, PERMITTING 10% $37,686 TECH STUDIES, MITIGATION 2.5% $9,421 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING/ADMIN. 15% $56,529 TOTAL $632,000
Olympic Boulevard Corridor Trail Connector Study Table B-15: Annual Maintenance Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT MAINTENANCE COST/YEAR TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST/YEAR Short-Term improvement Concept Bicycle Lanes and Bicycle Route Sweeping 5,138 LF $10 / 1,000 LF $51 Signs, Striping, and Pavement Markings $39,212 IC Installation Cost / 10 $3,921 Sidepath Maintenance 1,510 LF $2652 / 1,000 LF $4,005 Sidepath Pavement Maintenance $145,400 IC Installation Cost / 20 $7,270 Landscape Maintenance 1,370 LF $900 / 1,000 LF $1,233 Long-Term Improvement Concept Sidepath Maintenance 2,170 LF $2652 / 1,000 LF $5,755 Sidepath Pavement Maintenance $217,000 IC Installation Cost / 20 $10,850 Landscape Maintenance 2,170 LF $900 / 1,000 LF $1,953 B.7 Segment 5: Olympic Boulevard – Newell Avenue to I-680Table B-16: Short-Term Improvements Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS 5% $4,4256 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS AND INSURANCE 1 LS 2% $1,770 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS 10% $8,852 Subtotal $15,048 Sitework, Demolition and Removal - includes all demolition, site preparation for all construction; relocation or re-setting of utilities; temporary construction fencing. Remove existing striping (no lead present) 5,994 LF $2.00 $11,987 Subtotal $11,987 Signs and Pavement Markings - includes painted traffic lines and markings on pavement, and traffic signage. Bike lane, pavement markings, and signs 3,746 LF $5.25 $19,667 HAWK/RRFB 2 EA $22,250.00 $44,500 Miscellaneous 4" thermoplastic stripe 4,121 LF $3.00 $12,362 Subtotal $76,528 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $103,563 CONTINGENCY 20% $20,713 SURVEYING 5% $5,178 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATE 15% $15,534 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING/ADMIN. 15% $15,534 TOTAL $161,000 Table B-17: Long-Term Improvements Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST COST MOBILIZATION 1 LS 5% $40,624 GENERAL CONDITIONS, BONDS AND INSURANCE 1 LS 2% $16,249 EROSION CONTROL - INCLUDES ALL BMPS, SWPPP AND REPORTING 1 LS 5% $40,624 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS 10% $81,247 Subtotal $178,744 Sitework, Demolition and Removal - includes all demolition, site preparation for all construction; relocation or re-setting of utilities; temporary construction fencing. Sawcut pavement 5,919 LF $5.00 $29,595 Remove AC pavement 9,450 SF $0.80 $7,560 Remove concrete pavement 18,900 SF $5.00 $94,500 Remove and relocate existing light standard 5 EA $2,000.00 $10,000 Remove and relocate utility or signal cabinets (up to three) 1 EA $3,000.00 $3,000 Remove curb/gutter 5,919 LF $10.00 $59,190 Tree removal 6 EA $500.00 $3,000 Remove existing striping 7,560 LF $2.00 $15,120 Subtotal $221,965
Final Report DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST COST Concrete Work and Asphalt Paving - includes concrete curbs, 4" PCC sidewalk, Type I pedestrian ramps, concrete pads, Sidepath Construct curb & gutter 5,919 LF $55.00 $325,545 Construct 4" PCC sidewalk 9,450 SF $15.00 $141,750 Construct new inlet to existing storm drain 5 EA $3,000.00 $15,000 Colored stamped asphalt or concrete5,619 SF$15.00$84,285Subtotal $566,580 Planting 15 gallon trees with protective posts and root barriers, irrigation 6 EA $1,600.00 $9,600 Subtotal $9,600 Signs and Pavement Markings - includes painted traffic lines and markings on pavement, and traffic signage. Buffered bike lane and pavement markings 1,890 LF $7.58$14,326Subtotal $14,326 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $991,215 CONTINGENCY 20% $198,243 SURVEYING 5% $49,561 PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND ENGINEERING 15% $148,682 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION, PERMITTING 10% $99,121 TECH STUDIES, MITIGATION 2.5% $24,780 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING/ADMIN. 15% $148,682 TOTAL $1,661,000 Table B-18: Annual Maintenance Cost Estimate DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT MAINTENANCE COST/YEAR TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST/YEAR Short-Term improvement Concept Bicycle Lanes and Bicycle Route Sweeping 3,746 LF $10 / 1,000 LF $37.46 Signs, Striping, and Pavement Markings $76,528 IC Installation Cost / 10 $7,653 Long-Term Improvement Concept Bicycle Lanes and Bicycle Route Sweeping 1,890 LF $10 / 1,000 LF $19 Signs, Striping, and Pavement Markings $14,326 IC Installation Cost / 10 $1,433 Sidepath Maintenance 158 LF $2652 / 1,000 LF $418 Sidepath Pavement Maintenance $14,326 IC Installation Cost / 20 $716
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33
-1-
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33
(Uncodified)
(Central County Area of Benefit Fees)
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County ordains as follows:
SECTION 1. Summary and Purpose. This ordinance provides for the repeal of Contra Costa
County Ordinance Nos. 94-72 and 95-32, and Resolution Nos. and 94/604 and 95/273, the
reestablishment of the Central County Area of Benefit, and the adoption of revised transportation
mitigation fees for transportation improvements needed to mitigate transportation impacts of new
development in the area of benefit through 2040.
SECTION 2. Authority. This ordinance is enacted pursuant to Government Code sections
66001, et seq., 66484, and 66484.7, and Division 913 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance
Code, and other applicable laws and ordinances.
SECTION 3. Recitals and Findings of Fact.
(a) Under the Mitigation Fee Act, California Government Code section 66000, et seq., the
County is authorized to charge a development-project applicant, as a condition of project
approval, a fee that is proportional to the cost of public improvements necessary to serve
the development project, or to alleviate impacts caused by the development project.
Government Code sections 66484 and 66484.7 specifically authorize the County to
impose those fees to defray the actual or estimated costs of new or reconstructed bridges
over waterways, railways, freeways, major thoroughfares, and pedestrian, bicycle, transit,
and traffic-calming facilities that serve new development within a specific area of benefit.
(b) The Central County Area of Benefit was established by the Board of Supervisors’
adoption of Ordinance No. 95-32 and Resolution No. 95/273 to establish fees imposed on
each new development within the Central County Area of Benefit, to fund specified new
bridges and thoroughfares, or expansions of existing bridges and thoroughfares,
necessary to serve the development project or alleviate traffic impacts or demands caused
by the project. The South Walnut Creek Area of Benefit was established by the Board of
Supervisors’ adoption of Ordinance No. 94-72 and Resolution No. 94/604 to establish
fees imposed on each new development within the South Walnut Creek Area of Benefit,
to fund specified new bridges and thoroughfares, or expansions of existing bridges and
thoroughfares, necessary to serve the development project or alleviate traffic impacts or
demands caused by the project. Those fees funded many significant projects. Because of
changes in development and traffic patterns in the area, the Public Works Department
reevaluated the transportation improvements needed to serve new development in the
territory within the current Central County Area of Benefit and South Walnut Creek Area
of Benefit areas through 2040.
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33
-2-
(c) The County’s March 2021 Development Program Report (“Report”), including the
March 2021 “Nexus Study, Central County Area of Benefit” (“Nexus Study”) attached as
Exhibit D to the Report, have been prepared to determine the amount of the fees
necessary to fund new development’s share of the estimated costs of new or
reconstructed bridges over waterways, railways, freeways, major thoroughfares,
pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and traffic-calming facilities (the “Transportation
Improvements”) that are necessary to meet traffic demands generated by new
development through 2040 within a reestablished Central County Area of Benefit that
includes the area previously within the Central County Area of Benefit area and the South
Walnut Creek Area of Benefit. (Unless otherwise specified, all further references to
Central County Area of Benefit mean the reestablished Central County Area of Benefit.)
The Transportation Improvements are more particularly described in the Report, the
Nexus Study, and Sections 5.6 (Roadway and Transit Network Plans) and 5.8 (Pedestrian
Facilities and Bikeways) of Chapter 5 (Transportation and Circulation Element) of the
County’s 2005-2020 General Plan.
(d) The Report and Nexus Study propose a fair and equitable method for allocating a portion
of the costs of the Transportations Improvements to new development within the Central
County Area of Benefit. The cost of each of the Transportation Improvements in the
Report and Nexus Study is reasonable. The total amount of revenue expected to be
generated from fees charged and collected under this ordinance will not exceed the
estimated cost of the Transportation Improvements attributable to new development
within the Central County Area of Benefit. The County will rely on sources other than
transportation mitigation fee revenue to pay Transportation Improvement costs not
allocated to new development. The Transportation Improvements are necessary and
desirable within the Central County Area of Benefit.
(e) Payment of the fees adopted by this ordinance shall not be required unless the major
thoroughfares or planned bridge facilities are in addition to, or a reconstruction of, any
existing major thoroughfares or planned bridge facilities serving the Central County Area
of Benefit at the time that the boundaries of that area of benefit are established by this
ordinance. Because all of the Transportation Improvements are in addition to, or a
reconstruction or expansion of, existing thoroughfares and bridge facilities, the fees
adopted by this ordinance may be imposed on new development projects within the
Central County Area of Benefit.
(f) Pursuant to Government Code section 66001, the Board of Supervisors further finds:
(1) As determined in the Nexus Study, the purpose of the fees adopted and collected
pursuant to this ordinance is to fund new development’s share of the estimated
costs of the Transportation Improvements identified in the Nexus Study.
(2) As determined in the Nexus Study, there is a reasonable relationship between the
use of revenue generated by the fees and the type of new development projects on
which those fees shall be imposed.
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33
-3-
(3) As determined in the Nexus Study, there is a reasonable relationship between the
need for the Transportation Improvements that shall be funded by fee revenue,
and the types of new development within the Central County Area of Benefit on
which those fees shall be imposed.
(4) As determined in the Nexus Study, there is a reasonable relationship between the
amount of the fee imposed on each type of new development within the Central
County Area of Benefit, and the cost of the Transportation Improvements to be
funded by fee revenue.
(g) The Board of Supervisors further finds as follows:
(1) Pursuant to Government Code sections 54986, 65091, 66017, 66018, 66474.2,
subdivision (b), 66484, and 66484.7, and Division 913 of the Contra Costa
County Ordinance Code, notice of a public hearing on this ordinance was given
and published, and the public hearing was held. The Nexus Study and Report
were made available to the public at least ten (10) days before the hearing.
(2) If, within the time when protests may be filed under the provisions of this
ordinance, there is a written protest, filed with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors, by owners of more than one-half of the area of the property within
the Central County Area of Benefit, and sufficient protests are not withdrawn so
as to reduce that area to less than one-half of the area of the property within the
Central County Area of Benefit, these proceedings shall be abandoned and this
ordinance shall not be adopted. However, the Board of Supervisors has
considered all written protests, and all written and oral testimony offered at the
hearing, and finds that no majority protest exists.
(3) At the public hearing on this ordinance, the boundaries of the Central County
Area of Benefit, the estimated costs of the Transportation Improvements, and a
fair method of allocation of those costs to new development projects within the
Central County Area of Benefit were established.
SECTION 4. Definitions. For the purpose of this ordinance, the following terms have the
following meanings:
(a) “Development project” or “new development project,” means either of the following
located within the Central County Area of Benefit:
(1) Any new construction, or any addition, extension, or enlargement of an existing
structure or unit, which includes a dwelling unit for residential use or the floor
area of commercial, office or industrial use, requiring a building permit from the
County; or
(2) Any conversion or change in use of an existing structure requiring a building
permit from the County that would result in a change in the land use type.
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33
-4-
(b) “Square foot” means a square foot of gross floor area within the interior walls of a
building or portions thereof.
(c) “Dwelling-unit-equivalent” means the same level of traffic impacts attributable to one
dwelling unit, as determined in the Report and Nexus Study.
SECTION 5. Fee Adoption and Collection. Fees that apply to new development within the
Central County Area of Benefit are hereby adopted, and shall be charged and collected, as
specified in this section.
(a) Amount of the Fees.
(1) Central County Area of Benefit Fees. The following schedule of fees shall be
effective on the effective date of this ordinance:
Land Use Type Fee Per Unit
Single-Family Residential $ 5,335 per dwelling unit
Multi-Family Residential $ 3,275 per dwelling unit
Commercial/Retail $ 7.57 per square foot
Office $ 6.12 per square foot
Industrial $ 4.86 per square foot
Other $ 5,335 per dwelling unit equivalent
(2) Adjustment of Fees Beginning January 1, 2023. On January 1, 2023, and on each
January 1 thereafter, the amounts of the fees set forth in Section 5(a)(1), above,
shall be increased or decreased by a percentage equal to the percentage change, if
any, in the Engineering News-Record Construction Cost Index for the San
Francisco Bay Area for the 12-month period ending September 30 of the prior
year.
(b) Calculation of the Central County Area of Benefit Fee. Unless otherwise specified in this
ordinance, each new development project shall pay a fee calculated as described in this
Section 5(b).
(1) Calculation of the Central County Area of Benefit Fee for New Development that
Expands, Extends, or Replaces an Existing Development. If any new
development project will replace an existing development, or if any new
development project will expand or extend an existing development, by
increasing the number of dwelling units or square feet of floor area of, or the
number of dwelling-unit-equivalents attributable to, the existing development, the
fee imposed on the new development project shall be calculated as follows:
(A) For residential land uses: The applicable transportation mitigation fee in
Section 5(a) of this ordinance is multiplied by the difference of: (i) either
the number of dwelling units attributable to the new development that
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33
-5-
replaces an existing development, or the number of dwelling units
attributable to the development after the expansion or extension of the
existing development; minus (ii) the number of dwelling units attributable
to the existing development. That calculation is expressed as follows:
[Applicable fee per-dwelling unit] x [(number of dwelling units after
replacement or expansion/extension) – (number of dwelling units before
replacement or expansion/extension)]
(B) For office, industrial, and commercial/retail land uses: The applicable fee
in Section 5(a) of this ordinance is multiplied by the difference of: (i)
either the number of square feet of the new development that will replace
an existing development, or the number of square feet of the development
after expansion or extension of the existing development; minus (ii) the
number of square feet of the existing development. That calculation is
expressed as follows:
[Applicable fee per square foot] x [(number of square feet after
replacement or expansion/extension) – (number of square feet before
replacement or expansion/extension)]
(C) For “other” land uses: The applicable fee in Section 5(a) of this ordinance
is multiplied by the difference of: (i) either the number of dwelling-unit-
equivalents attributable to the new development that will replace an
existing development, or the number of dwelling-unit-equivalents
attributable to the development after expansion or extension of the existing
development; minus (ii) the number of dwelling-unit-equivalents
attributable to the existing development. That calculation is expressed as
follows:
[(Applicable fee per dwelling-unit-equivalent)] x [(number of dwelling-
unit-equivalents after replacement or expansion/extension) – (number of
dwelling-unit-equivalents before replacement or expansion/extension)]
The County will determine the number of dwelling unit equivalents that
will be generated by the new development project based on: information
generated by project-specific traffic studies prepared by a professional
engineer; the standards set forth in the then-current edition of the Institute
of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual (“ITE Manual”); and
other information provided by the new development project applicant that
the County deems relevant.
(D) Notwithstanding any other provision of this ordinance, if the result of the
calculation required by this Section 5(b)(1) is zero or a negative number,
then no fee shall be imposed on the new development project.
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33
-6-
(2) Calculation of the Central County Area of Benefit Fee for New Development that
Does Not Expand, Extend, or Replace an Existing Development. For any new
development project that does not expand, extend, or replace an existing
development, the fee imposed on the new development project shall be calculated
as follows:
(A) For residential land uses: The applicable fee in Section 5(a) of this
ordinance is multiplied by the number of dwelling units attributable to the
new development. That calculation is expressed as follows:
(Applicable fee per dwelling unit) x (number of dwelling units)
(B) For office, industrial, and commercial/retail land uses: The applicable fee
in Section 5(a) of this ordinance is multiplied by the number of square feet
of the new development. That calculation is expressed as follows:
(Applicable fee per square foot) x (number of square feet of floor area)
(C) For “other” land uses: The applicable fee in Section 5(a) of this ordinance
is multiplied by the number of dwelling unit equivalents attributable to the
new development. That calculation is expressed as follows:
(Applicable fee per dwelling-unit-equivalent) x (number of dwelling-unit-
equivalents attributable to new development)
The County will determine the number of dwelling unit equivalents
attributable to the new development project based on: information
generated by project-specific traffic studies prepared by a professional
engineer; the standards set forth in the then-current edition of the ITE
Manual; and other information provided by the new development project
applicant that the County deems relevant.
(c) Applicability and Establishment of Central County Area of Benefit Boundaries. This
ordinance repeals Board of Supervisors Ordinance Nos. 94-72 and 95-32, and Resolution
Nos. and 94/604 and 95/273. The boundaries of the Central County Area of Benefit are
hereby readopted and reestablished in accordance with Government Code sections 66484
and 66484.7. The boundaries now include the territory previously within the South
Walnut Creek Area of Benefit. The transportation mitigation fees specified in this
ordinance shall apply to all new development within the reestablished Central County
Area of Benefit, unless otherwise specified in this ordinance. The boundaries of the
reestablished Central County Area of Benefit are more particularly described in the legal
description, and are depicted on the map, attached hereto together as Exhibit A and
incorporated herein by reference.
(d) Time of Collection. The fee attributable to each new development project shall be paid
before the County issues a building permit for the new development project. Payment of
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33
-7-
the fee shall be a condition of building permit issuance, as specified in Chapter 913-4 of
the County Ordinance Code.
(e) Exemptions. No new development project is exempt from payment of a fee under this
ordinance, unless, as of the date of the notice published pursuant to Government Code
Section 66474.2, subdivision (b), either of the following apply:
(1) The new development project has perfected an exemption from the fee under the
vesting tentative map law; or
(2) The new development project has entered into a development agreement with the
County that expressly excludes assessment of additional fees on that project.
(f) Fee Reductions and Credits.
(1) A project applicant may request a reduction in fees from the County if it is
determined that the project will generate a lower number of trips than data
provided by the ITE Manual that was used as the basis for the Report. A
requested fee reduction must be based on a traffic study that determines that the
traffic impacts of the proposed development would generate fees that are less than
the fees set forth in Section 5, above. The methodology for conducting the study
shall be developed and approved by the County. The County shall determine the
appropriate fee reduction based upon the proportionate reduction in traffic
impacts demonstrated in the traffic study.
(2) A project applicant may receive a credit against fees for the dedication of land for
right-of-way and/or construction of any portion of the Transportation
Improvements to be funded with the fees collected pursuant to this ordinance,
where the right-of-way or construction is beyond that which would otherwise be
required for approval of the proposed development. The calculation of the
amount of credit against fees for these dedications or improvements shall be based
on a determination by the County that the credits are exclusive of the dedications,
setbacks, improvements, and/or traffic mitigation measures that are required by
ordinance or local standards. In addition, the credit shall be calculated based
upon the actual cost of construction of improvements or, in the case of land
dedication, on an independent appraisal approved by the County. All fee credits
and reimbursements for dedications in lieu of payment of any transportation
mitigation fee, or portion thereof, required to be paid by this ordinance shall be
subject to an agreement executed in accordance with the Traffic Fee Credit and
Reimbursement Policy, approved by the Board of Supervisors on June 5, 2007,
which is made a part hereof and incorporated herein by reference.
(g) Fee Waivers.
(1) Upon written request of the project applicant, the Public Works Director may
waive the fees collected under this ordinance for dwelling units that the Public
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33
-8-
Works Director determines, in a written finding, fit into one of the following
categories: (1) rental units affordable to households earning less than 80% of the
area median income; or (2) ownership units affordable to households earning less
than 120% of the area median income.
(2) As a condition of such waiver, the project applicant shall enter into a regulatory
agreement with the County, guaranteeing the use, occupancy, affordability, and
term of affordability of such dwelling units. Rental units for which a waiver is
granted under this section shall be restricted to that use for a minimum of 55
years. Ownership units for which a waiver is granted under this section shall be
restricted to that use for a minimum of 30 years.
(h) Fee Waiver for Inclusionary Housing Units. In lieu of the fee waiver for affordable
housing units as set forth in Section 5(g), development projects that are subject to
Chapter 822-4 of the County Ordinance Code shall be eligible for a waiver of the fees
collected under this ordinance as follows:
(1) Fees shall be waived for each rental unit to be developed and rented as an
inclusionary unit under the terms and conditions of Section 822-4.410(a) of the
County Ordinance Code.
(2) Fees shall be waived for each for-sale unit to be developed and sold as an
inclusionary unit under the terms and conditions of Section 822-4.410(b) of the
County Ordinance Code.
(3) If a fee is paid in lieu of constructing some or all inclusionary units in a
development project, pursuant to Section 822-4.404 of the County Ordinance
Code, the fees collected under this ordinance shall be waived for the number of
inclusionary units for which the in-lieu fee is paid.
(i) Senior Housing and Congregate Care. Nothing in this ordinance shall be construed to
abridge or modify the Board’s discretion, upon proper application for a senior housing or
congregate care facility, to adjust or to waive the fees required to be paid under this
ordinance, pursuant to Government Code Section 65915.
(j) Accessory Dwelling Units. An accessory dwelling unit that is approved by a ministerial
permit issued under Chapter 82-24 of the County Ordinance Code is exempt from
payment of fees under this ordinance.
(k) Deposit of Fee Revenue. Revenue from fees paid pursuant to this ordinance shall be
deposited into a fund covering the Transportation Improvements identified in the Report
and Nexus Study, and shall be separately accounted for. The funds shall not be
commingled with other funds, except where the funds are temporarily invested pursuant
to Government Code section 66006. Fee revenues deposited in the fund shall be
expended solely for the purposes described in this ordinance. Any interest earned on
deposits in the fund also shall be deposited in that fund and used for those purposes.
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33
-9-
(l) Limitations. No fees collected pursuant to this ordinance may be used to reimburse the
construction costs of bridge or thoroughfare facilities serving the Central County Area of
Benefit on the effective date of this ordinance. However, fee revenues may be used to
reimburse any general fund monies, or other County revenues, advanced to pay for any
planned bridge or thoroughfare improvements.
SECTION 6. Reporting and Accounting Requirements.
(a) Annual Reporting. Within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, the Public
Works Director, or designee, shall make available to the public a report regarding the
fund established for receipt of deposits of the fees collected by the County pursuant to
this ordinance. The report shall be reviewed by the Board of Supervisors at a regularly
scheduled meeting that will be held, and notice of which will be provided, in accordance
with Government Code Section 66006. The report shall contain the following
information for the fiscal year:
(1) A brief description of the type of fee in the account or fund.
(2) The amount of the fees.
(3) The beginning and ending balance of the account or fund.
(4) The amount of the fees collected and the interest earned.
(5) An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and
the amount of the expenditures on each improvement, including the total
percentage of the cost of the public improvement that was funded with those fees.
(6) An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public
improvement will commence if the Board determines that sufficient funds have
been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement, and
the public improvement remains incomplete.
(7) A description of each interfund transfer or loan from the account or fund,
including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees will be
expended, and, in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be
repaid, and the rate of interest that the account or fund will receive on the loan.
(8) The amount of refunds made pursuant to Government Code section 66001,
subdivision (e), and any allocations pursuant to Government Code section 66001,
subdivision (f).
(b) Periodic Review by the Board. In the fifth fiscal year following the first deposit into the
fund established for receipt of deposits of the fees collected pursuant to this ordinance,
and at least once every five years thereafter, the Board of Supervisors shall make all of
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33
-10-
the following findings with respect to that portion of the Central County Area of Benefit
fund remaining unexpended, whether committed or uncommitted, pursuant to
Government Code Section 66001:
(1) Identify the purpose to which the fees are to be put.
(2) Demonstrate a reasonable relationship between the fees and the purpose for which
they are charged.
(3) Identify all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of
incomplete transportation improvements identified in the Report and Nexus
Study.
(4) Designate the approximate dates on which the funding referred to in Section
6(b)(3), above, is expected to be deposited into the appropriate account or fund.
SECTION 7. Repeal of Existing Fees. Except as specified in this Section 7 and Section 9,
below, Contra Costa County Ordinance Nos. 94-72 and 95-32, and Resolution Nos. and 94/604
and 95/273, are hereby repealed and superseded by this ordinance, as of the effective date of this
ordinance. However, this repeal shall not affect any fees that were imposed on any development
project pursuant to Ordinance No. 94-72 and Ordinance No. 95-32 prior to the effective date of
this ordinance, which fees shall be paid and collected under the provisions Ordinance No. 94-72
or Ordinance No. 95-32, whichever is applicable.
SECTION 8. Judicial Review. Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set aside,
void, or annul the fees established by this ordinance shall be commenced within one hundred
twenty (120) days after the effective date of this ordinance. Any action to attack any adjustment
to the schedule of fees pursuant to Section 5(a)(2) of this ordinance shall be commenced within
one hundred twenty (120) days after the effective date of that adjustment.
SECTION 9. Severability. Notwithstanding any other provision of this ordinance to the
contrary, if a court of competent jurisdiction determines any fee set forth in Section 5 of this
ordinance is invalid or unenforceable, the comparable fee adopted by Ordinance No. 94-72 or
Ordinance No. 95-32, shall be deemed not to have been repealed and shall remain in effect and
subject to the remaining provisions of this ordinance. Notwithstanding any other provision of
this ordinance to the contrary, if a court of competent jurisdiction determines this ordinance is
invalid or unenforceable, Ordinance No. 94-72, Ordinance No. 95-32, Resolution No. 94/604,
and Resolution No. 95/273 shall be deemed not to have been repealed and shall remain in full
force and effect.
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33
-11-
SECTION 10. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective 60 days after passage,
and, within 15 days of passage, this ordinance shall be published once, with the names of the
Supervisors voting for and against it, in the East Bay Times, a newspaper of general circulation
published in this County. Pursuant to section 913-6.026 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance
Code, the Clerk of the Board shall promptly file a certified copy of this ordinance with the
County Recorder.
PASSED and ADOPTED on ________________________by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
_____________________________
Board Chair
ATTEST:
MONICA NINO, Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors and County Administrator
By _________________________
Deputy
Attachments: Exhibit A (Map and Legal Description of Central County Area of
Benefit Boundaries)
SMS
H:\Client Matters\Public Works\AOB Fees\Central County AOB\Ordinance 2021-33 (Central County AOB Fees).doc
Map
Boundary Description
A portion of Sections 23, 24, 25, 26, 35, and 36, Township 1 North, Range 3 East, Mount Diablo Meridian, in the
county of Contra Costa, State of California, described as follows:
Beginning at the southeast corner of Lot “E” of Subdivision 7252 filed September 15,1989 in Book 337 of Maps at
page 30; thence westerly along the northerly right of way line of State Highway 4, being also the south line of said Lot
“E” and the south line of Lot “J” of Subdivision 7106 filed June 21,1989 in Book 334 of Maps at page 39, north
89°12’29” west 4600.00 feet more or less to the east line of Lot 184 of Subdivision 6561 filed July 22, 1985 in Book
291 of Maps at page 39; thence continuing along said northerly right of way line, thru said Lot 184, westerly 312.22
feet to the southeast corner of Parcel “A” of Subdivision 6760 filed June 23, 1988 in Book 323 of Maps at page 9;
thence continuing along said right of way line, being also the southerly line of Parcels “A”, “AA” and “B” of said
Subdivision 6760, westerly 4352.86 feet to the southwest corner of said Parcel “B”; thence leaving said right of way
line and along the westerly line of said Subdivision, thence north 00°56’27” east 2520.11 feet; thence north 00°59’24”
east 628.84 feet to the northwest corner of said Subdivision;
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33OR
-12-
EXHIBIT A
MAP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CENTRAL COUNTY AREA OF BENEFIT
thence along the westerly line of Subdivision 6979 filed March 6, 1989 in Book 331 of Maps at page 20, north
00°59’24” east 1100.80 feet; thence along the westerly line of Subdivision 7140 filed April 8, 1996 in Book 385 of Maps
at page 43, north 00°59’32” east 916.31 feet to the northwest corner of said Subdivision; thence along the north line of
said Subdivision, north 89°08’08” east 1388.74 feet to the northeast corner of said Subdivision; thence north 47°37’44”
east 1249.47 feet along the northwesterly line of Subdivision 6144 filed March 28, 1984 in Book 277 of Maps at page
42; thence north 47°37’44” east 265.13 feet along the northwesterly line of Subdivision 4687 filed May 24, 1978 in
Book 211 of Maps at page 5; thence northeasterly along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 660.00 feet
through an angle of 14°02’20”, an arc distance of 161.71 feet to a point on the southern boundary of Subdivision 4206
filed July 6, 1972 in Book 148 of Maps at page 1; thence along said boundary, north 42°37’00” west 12.66 feet; thence
north 47°23’00” east 123.10 feet; thence north 16°18’57” east 436.29 feet to the southeast corner of Subdivision 4205
filed June 22, 1972 in Book 147 of Maps at page 27; thence along the westerly lines of said Subdivision 4205 the
following six courses; thence north 16°18’57” east 52.94 feet; thence north 15°55’12” east 300.00 feet; thence north
15°43’32” east 600.21 feet; thence north 14°59’17” east 344.51 feet; thence north 17°33’17” east 300.09 feet; thence
north 16°03’32” east 220.63 feet to an angle point in Lot 18 of Subdivision 5811 filed August 18, 1980 in Book 236 of
Maps at page 4, thence along the westerly boundary of said Subdivision 5811 the following nine courses; north
16°03’32” east 139.38 feet; thence north 18°40’12”east 140.12 feet; thence north 08°17’27”east 106.18 feet; thence
north 28°33’12” east 147.78 feet; thence north 30°02’22” east 130.07 feet; thence north 35°10’12” east 170.29 feet;
thence north 33°30’07” east 312.11 feet; thence north 70°55’07” east 5.88 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 1 of said
Subdivision, also being the northwest corner of Lot 70 of “Amended Map” Subdivision 4077 filed July 8, 1974 in Book
170 of Maps at page 36; thence along the northerly line of said Subdivision, north 70°55’07” east 65.07 feet; thence
north 73°22’17” east 52.68 feet; thence north 82°50’17” east 225.73 feet; thence along the northern line of Subdivision
4224 filed December 19, 1973 in Book 165 of Maps at page 38 north 82°50’17” east 31.00 feet; thence north
83°04’37” east 507.95 feet; thence north 84°25’17” east 13.83 feet; thence along the northerly line of Subdivision
4077, north 84°25’17” east 314.46 feet; thence north 81°53’52” east 372.07 feet; thence along the northerly line of
Amended Map Subdivision 3653 filed June 13, 1974 in Book 169 of Maps at page 42, north 81°53’52” east 46.99
feet; thence north 82°39’37” east 260.45 feet more or less to a point of curvature on the north line of Lot 16,
Subdivision 4223 filed December 19, 1973 in Book 165 of Maps at page 31; thence along the northerly line of said
Subdivision, north 83°04’37” east 1009.26 feet to the western line of Lot 80 in Subdivision 4076 filed December 9,
1970 in Book 134 of Maps at page 19; thence along said Lot 80, north 00°58’07” east 8.16 feet; thence north 82°
22’27” east 60.45 feet to the northeast corner of said Lot being also the northwestern corner of Lot 15 Subdivision
4378 filed June 10, 1977 in Book 198 of Maps at page 8; thence along the northerly line of said Subdivision the
following seven courses; thence north 82°22’27” east 120.00 feet; thence north 87°17’02” east 82.74 feet; thence
south 58°54’13” east 168.88 feet; thence south 69°31’13 east 43.97 feet; thence north 82°38’57” east 172.35 feet;
thence south 87°58’43” east 73.67 feet; thence south 83°56’58” east 83.15 feet; thence along the northerly line of
Subdivision 5353 filed December 21, 1978 in Book 219 of Maps at page 44 the following twenty courses; thence
south 83°56’58” east 163.59 feet; thence south 79°55’08” east 176.44 feet; thence north 77°14’02” east 62.13; thence
north 57°14’12” east 49.86 feet; thence north 43°06’52” east 26.12 feet; thence north 21°46’37” east 32.03 feet;
thence north 14°54’32” east 55.15 feet; north 02°38’12” east 76.77 feet; thence north 10°04’07” east 93.55 feet;
thence north 27°32’47” east 87.19 feet; thence north 34°36’52 east 63.80 feet; thence north 45°23’17” east 71.36 feet;
thence north 35°01’32” east 173.30 feet; thence north 44°21’42” east 78.12 feet; thence north 67°09’37” east 76.44
feet; thence south 81°13’28” east 71.20 feet; thence south 70°22’33” east 96.67 feet; thence south 71°02’13” east
80.05 feet; thence south 76°51’23” east 3.33 feet; thence south 89°02’35” east 779.76 feet; thence along the easterly
line of said Subdivision the following three courses; thence south 00°57’32” west 216.15 feet; thence south 77°22’13”
east 31.45 feet; thence south 13°53’01” west 327.93 feet; thence southerly along the easterly line of said Subdivision
5353, the easterly line of Subdivision 5586 filed November 7, 1979 in Book 233 of Maps at page 13, the easterly line
of Subdivision 6026 filed April 2, 1981 in Book 250 of Maps at page 33, the easterly line of Subdivision 6145 filed June
17, 1982 in Book 264 of Maps at page 32, the easterly line of Marina Road recorded July 17, 1981 in series No.
81-88549, the easterly line of the parcel described in the grant deed recorded April 23, 1979 in Book 9320 Official
Records page 418, the easterly line of the parcel described in the grant deed recorded June 20, 1972 in Book 6678
Official Records page 355, and the easterly line of said Subdivision 7252 (337 M 30), south 00°44’31” west 9792.35
feet to the point of beginning.
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-33OR
-13-
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. OPEN the hearing on the proposed formation of Zone 3008 within County Service Area P-6;
CONSIDER all oral and written comments; and CLOSE the hearing.
2. DETERMINE whether a majority protest of the voters residing within the boundaries of proposed Zone
3008 exists pursuant to Government Code Section 25217.1(b)(1). In the event that the Board determines a
majority protest exists, TERMINATE the proceedings.
3. If the Board determines a majority protest does not exist, ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/323, attached
hereto, establishing Zone 3008 of County Service Area P-6 subject to voter approval of a special tax to fund
police protection services within the zone.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of establishing the Police Service District and the election is paid for by the developer of the
subdivision.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: (925) 655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Rosa Mena
D.4
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:HEARING TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED FORMATION OF ZONE 3008 IN THE COUNTY SERVICE AREA
OF P-6 IN THE SAN PABLO AREA OF THE COUNTY (DISTRICT I)
BACKGROUND:
Per the conditions of approval for Subdivision No. 9491 (County File #SD18-9491), prior to recording
the final map for the subdivision, the subdivider is required to establish a special police services tax
district for the subdivision in order to provide additional funding to augment police services in the area
of the subdivision. The property to be placed within the special tax district consists of a 2.73-acre site
located at 16500 San Pablo Avenue in the unincorporated San Pablo area of the County.
On September 14, 2021, the Board granted conceptual approval for a December 14, 2021, ballot measure
seeking approval of a special tax to fund an increase in the level of police protection services that is
provided in the unincorporated San Pablo area of the County.
On September 14, 2021, the Board approved Resolution No. 2021/280, as required by Government Code
Section 25217, subdivision (b), as the first step in forming a new zone within County Service Area
(CSA) P-6. The proposed zone would serve as the vehicle to collect special taxes within the proposed
zone if a special tax measure is approved by voters on December 14, 2021.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 25217.1, subdivision (a), at the public hearing, the Board is
required to hear and consider any protests to the formation of the zone. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 25217.1, subdivision (b)(1), in the case of inhabited territory, if at the conclusion of the public
hearing, the Board determines that more than 50 percent of the total number of voters residing within
the proposed zone have filed written objections to the formation, then the Board shall determine that a
majority protest exists and terminate the proceedings.
If there is no majority protest, the Board may continue the proceedings to form the zone by adopting
Resolution No. 2021/323, which would establish Zone 3008 subject to voter approval of the special tax.
A separate hearing is also scheduled for October 12, 2021, to consider the adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the levy of the tax.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Zone 3008 would not be formed and the subdivider would be unable to comply with the conditions of
approval of the project. The subdivider would be unable to record the final map for the subdivision.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 2021/323
Exhibit A - Legal Description
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Resolution No. 2021/280
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed Resolution No. 2021/323
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 10/12/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/323
IN THE MATTER OF CREATING ZONE 3008 OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6 IN THE UNINCORPORATED SAN
PABLO AREA OF THE COUNTY
WHEREAS, this Board recognizes the need for increased police protection services in the above subject zone and the difficulty
of funding the current or an increased level of services; and
WHEREAS, establishing the subject zone is a necessary step for the Board of Supervisors to seek voter approval of a special tax
for increased police protection services in the zone area. Government Code Sections 25217 and 25217.1 establish procedures for
the formation of a zone within a county service area;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD RESOLVED THAT:
1. It is in the public interest to provide an increased level of police protection services in the area of proposed Zone 3008 of
County Service Area P-6.
2. A majority protest against the proposed formation of Zone 3008 does not exist, pursuant to Government Code Section
25217.1, subdivision (b).
3. Subject to voter approval of Ordinance No. 2021-28 on December 14, 2021, authorizing the levy of a special tax within
proposed Zone 3008, that portion of Contra Costa County Service Area P-6 described in Exhibit A attached hereto and shown in
Exhibit B attached hereto is established as Zone 3008 of County Service Area P-6, effective upon this Board’s adoption of a
resolution declaring the results of the December 14, 2021, election (“Effective Date”).
4. No affected properties located in Zone 3008 will be taxed for any existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligations as a
result of the formation of said zone.
5. On or after the Effective Date, the Clerk of this Board shall cause the filing of a statement of the creation of said zone to be
made with the County Assessor and the State Board of Equalization (in Sacramento) pursuant to Government Code Sections
54900-54902. The filing shall include a map or plat indicating the boundaries of said zone.
Contact: (925) 655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Rosa Mena
Order Number: 0131-622320ala
Page Number: 6
First American Title
Page 6 of 14
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property in the unincorporated area of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as
follows:
PORTION OF LOT A AND PORTION OF THE "70' ACCESS ROAD", DESIGNATED ON THE MAP OF, TARA
HILLS UNIT NO. 1, FILED NOVEMBER 20, 1951, MAP BOOK 45, PAGE 22 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;
BEGINNING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A, BEING ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF
O'HATCH DRIVE, AS SAID LOT AND DRIVE ARE DESIGNATED ON SAID MAP, 45 M 22, THENCE FROM
SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALONG SAID SOUTHWEST LINE, NORTH 58° 09' 07'' WEST, 255.02 FEET
AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 175 FEET, AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 77.87 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED
IN THE RESOLUTION OF ABANDONMENT RECORDED JUNE 15, 1964, BOOK 4639, OFFICIAL RECORDS,
PAGE 834; THENCE ALONG THE EXTERIOR LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID
RESOLUTION. 4639 OFFICIAL RECORDS 834, AS FOLLOWS: NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A
CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 175 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 21.14 FEET; NORTH 31°
23' 55" WEST, 38.35 FEET, NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
WITH A RADIUS OF 30 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 44' 48" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 47.37
FEET AND SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 4250
FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 139.97 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND FIRSTLY
DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO OSCAR H. LIEBERT, RECORDED JUNE 16, 1964, BOOK 4639, OFFICIAL
RECORDS, PAGE 282; THENCE ALONG THE EXTERIOR LINE OF SAID LIEBERT PARCEL, SOUTH 32° 39'
50" EAST, 131.68 FEET AND SOUTH 53° 30' 34" WEST, 123.5 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID
LOT A; THENCE ALONG THE EXTERIOR LINE OF SAID LOT A, AS FOLLOWS: SOUTH 36° 29' 26'' EAST,
101.53 FEET; SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 950
FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 95.18 FEET; SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO
THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 50 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 27.74 FEET; SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE
ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 50 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 27.74
FEET; SOUTH 30° 45' EAST, 16.80 FEET; NORTH 59° 15' EAST 377.79 FEET AND NORTH 31° 50' 53''
EAST, 54.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
APN: 403-202-011-9
Exhibit A
P:\Projects\2030053.50 Tara Hills San Pablo Final Map and Condos\DWG\Legals and Plats\County Requested Plat\Exhibit Plat.dwg 07/26/2021 - 02:26 PM woejl 1:1
Exhibit B, revised on July 26, 2021
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 09/14/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/280
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO FORM ZONE 3008 OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6 IN THE UNINCORPORATED
SAN PABLO AREA
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES:
1. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County proposes the formation of new zone in the unincorporated San Pablo area of
County Service Area (CSA) P-6, pursuant to Article 8 of Chapter 2.3 of Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the California
Government Code.
2. The boundaries of the territory to be included in the zone area are described in 'Exhibit A' and shown in 'Exhibit B', both of
which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
3. The formation of Zone 3008 is proposed to provide the County of Contra Costa with a method of financing an increased level
of police protection services to the area within the zone.
4. The proposed zone would provide a level of police protection services that exceeds the level of service outside the zone, and if
approved by the voters, the proposed zone would generate additional revenue in the form of special taxes to fund the increase in
this level of service.
5. The increase in the level of service would be financed through the levy of a voter-approved special tax on all taxable parcels
within the zone.
6. The name proposed for the zone is "Zone 3008" of CSA P-6.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT at 9:00 a.m. on October 12, 2021, in the Chamber of the Board of Supervisors,
County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, CA 94553, this Board will conduct a public hearing upon the
proposed formation of Zone 3008 of CSA P-6. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing by
(1) publishing a notice that complies with Government Code Section 25217, subdivision (d)(1), pursuant to Government Code
Section 6061; (2) mailing the notice to all owners of property within the proposed zone; (3) mailing the notice to each city and
special district that contains, or whose sphere of influence contains the proposed zone; and (4) verifying that the notice is posted
in at least three public places within the territory of the proposed zone.
Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925) 655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: September 14, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc:
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. OPEN hearing to consider adopting Ordinance No. 2021-28, authorizing the levy of a special tax for
police protection services in Zone 3008 of County Service area P-6 in the unincorporated San Pablo area of
the County; CONSIDER oral and written comments received; and CLOSE the public hearing.
2. ADOPT Ordinance No. 2021-28, attached hereto.
3. ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/324, attached hereto, authorizing an election in Zone 3008 of County
Service Area P-6 to consider approval of Ordinance No. 2021-28.
4. DIRECT the County Clerk, Elections Division, to conduct the election required by Government Code
Sections 23027 and 53978. This election shall be held on December 14, 2021.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of establishing the Police Service District and election is paid for by the developer of the
subdivision.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925)
655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Rosa Mena
D.5
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF PROPOSED SPECIAL TAX ORDINANCE AND AUTHORIZE
ELECTION TO OBTAIN VOTER APPROVAL (DISTRICT I)
BACKGROUND:
Per the conditions of approval for Subdivision No. 9491 (County File #SD18-9491), prior to recording
the final map for the subdivision, the subdivider is required to establish a special Police Services tax
district for the purposes of providing additional funding to augment police services in the area of the
subdivision. The property to be subdivided and placed within the proposed special tax district consists of
a 2.73-acre site located at 16500 San Pablo Avenue in the unincorporated San Pablo area of the County.
On September 14, 2021, the Board approved Resolution No. 2021/280, as required by Government Code
Section 25217, subdivision (b), as the first step in forming a new zone within County Service Area
(CSA) P-6 in the unincorporated San Pablo area of the County. The proposed zone would serve as the
vehicle to collect special taxes within the boundaries of the zone if a special tax measure is approved by
registered voters within the zone area at the December 14, 2021, election.
The Board is scheduled to conduct a separate hearing on October 12, 2021, on the formation of the
proposed zone. If the Board determines there is no majority protest to the formation of this new zone,
and if the Board adopts Resolution No. 2021/323, establishing CSA P-6, Zone 3008 subject to voter
approval of the special tax, the next step in the process is the hearing on the adoption of a special tax
ordinance, the adoption of that ordinance and adoption of a resolution submitting the tax measure to the
voters.
In this action, the Board is asked to conduct the hearing on, and adopt, the special tax ordinance
(Ordinance No. 2021-28), which would authorize the levy of a special tax for police protection services
on all taxable parcels in the area of Zone 3008 if a special tax ballot measure is approved by a two-thirds
majority of the registered voters in the zone area. Resolution No. 2021/324, the adoption of which is also
recommended, sets forth appropriate ballot language, directs the County Clerk, Elections Division, to
conduct the aforementioned election as part of the December 14, 2021, election, and supplies
appropriate ballot language.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The project developer would be unable to comply with the conditions of approval for the project. The
developer would be unable to record the final map for the subdivision.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 2021/324
Exhibit A - Legal Description
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Exhibit C - Ordinance No. 2021-28
Resolution No. 2021/280
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed Resolution No. 2021/324
Signed Ordinance 2021-28
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 10/12/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/324
IN THE MATTER OF AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL TAX IN PROPOSED ZONE 3008 OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6
WHEREAS, this Board recognizes the need for increased police protection services in the above subject zone and the difficulty
of funding the current or an increased level of services. Government Code Sections 50077 and 53978 establish procedures for
voter authorization of a special tax in order to provide additional funding for police protection;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. Ordinance No. 2021-28, adopted on this date, is to be presented for approval of the voters of proposed Zone 3008 of County
Service Area P-6 at the election to be held on December 14, 2021, according to the following ballot proposition:
“Shall Ordinance No. 2021-28, to provide additional funding for police protection services, be approved to authorize a
special tax on property located in Zone 3008 of County Service Area P-6 in the unincorporated San Pablo area of the
County, at an initial annual amount of $200 per parcel for single-family, residential parcels, with higher and lower
amounts for properties in other use categories identified in the ordinance, commencing with the tax year beginning July 1,
2022?"
2. The Contra Costa County Registrar of Voters is designated as the Election Official for this election, and the County Clerk,
Elections Division, is hereby authorized and directed to provide all notices and take all other actions necessary to hold the
election described in this resolution including, but not limited to, providing notices of times within which arguments for and
against are to be submitted.
3. The County Administrator, or designee, shall serve as the Eligible Filer for purposes of filing necessary documents with the
Elections Official to facilitate listing of the above ballot proposition.
Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925) 655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Rosa Mena
Order Number: 0131-622320ala
Page Number: 6
First American Title
Page 6 of 14
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property in the unincorporated area of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as
follows:
PORTION OF LOT A AND PORTION OF THE "70' ACCESS ROAD", DESIGNATED ON THE MAP OF, TARA
HILLS UNIT NO. 1, FILED NOVEMBER 20, 1951, MAP BOOK 45, PAGE 22 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;
BEGINNING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A, BEING ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF
O'HATCH DRIVE, AS SAID LOT AND DRIVE ARE DESIGNATED ON SAID MAP, 45 M 22, THENCE FROM
SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALONG SAID SOUTHWEST LINE, NORTH 58° 09' 07'' WEST, 255.02 FEET
AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 175 FEET, AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 77.87 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED
IN THE RESOLUTION OF ABANDONMENT RECORDED JUNE 15, 1964, BOOK 4639, OFFICIAL RECORDS,
PAGE 834; THENCE ALONG THE EXTERIOR LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID
RESOLUTION. 4639 OFFICIAL RECORDS 834, AS FOLLOWS: NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A
CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 175 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 21.14 FEET; NORTH 31°
23' 55" WEST, 38.35 FEET, NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
WITH A RADIUS OF 30 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 44' 48" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 47.37
FEET AND SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 4250
FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 139.97 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND FIRSTLY
DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO OSCAR H. LIEBERT, RECORDED JUNE 16, 1964, BOOK 4639, OFFICIAL
RECORDS, PAGE 282; THENCE ALONG THE EXTERIOR LINE OF SAID LIEBERT PARCEL, SOUTH 32° 39'
50" EAST, 131.68 FEET AND SOUTH 53° 30' 34" WEST, 123.5 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID
LOT A; THENCE ALONG THE EXTERIOR LINE OF SAID LOT A, AS FOLLOWS: SOUTH 36° 29' 26'' EAST,
101.53 FEET; SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 950
FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 95.18 FEET; SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO
THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 50 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 27.74 FEET; SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE
ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 50 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 27.74
FEET; SOUTH 30° 45' EAST, 16.80 FEET; NORTH 59° 15' EAST 377.79 FEET AND NORTH 31° 50' 53''
EAST, 54.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
APN: 403-202-011-9
Exhibit A
P:\Projects\2030053.50 Tara Hills San Pablo Final Map and Condos\DWG\Legals and Plats\County Requested Plat\Exhibit Plat.dwg 07/26/2021 - 02:26 PM woejl 1:1
Exhibit B, revised on July 26, 2021
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-28
(Uncodified)
(An Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County)
Authorizing a Special Tax for Police Protection Services in Zone 3008
of County Service Area P-6
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ORDAINS as follows:
ARTICLE I. PURPOSE AND INTENT. It is the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to
authorize the levy of a tax on parcels of real property on the secured property tax roll of Contra
Costa County that are within Zone 3008 of Contra Costa County Service Area No. P-6 in order to
augment funding for police protection services.
This tax is a special tax within the meaning of Section 4 of Article XIIIA of the California
Constitution. Because the burden of this tax falls upon property, this tax also is a property tax, but
this tax is not determined according to nor in any manner based upon the value of property; this tax
is levied on a parcel and use of property basis. Insofar as not inconsistent with this Ordinance or
with legislation authorizing special taxes and insofar as applicable to a property tax that is not based
on value, such provisions of the California Revenue and Taxation Code and of Article XIII of the
California Constitution as relate to ad valorem property taxes are intended to apply to the collection
and administration of this tax (Article IV of this Ordinance), as authorized by law.
The revenues raised by this tax are to be used solely for the purposes of obtaining,
furnishing, operating, and maintaining police protection equipment or apparatus, for paying the
salaries and benefits of police protection personnel, and for such other police protection service
expenses as are deemed necessary.
ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS. The following definitions shall apply throughout the
Ordinance:
1. “Parcel” means the land and any improvements thereon, designated by an assessor’s
parcel map and parcel number and carried on the secured property tax roll of Contra Costa County.
For the purposes of the Ordinance, “parcel” does not include any land or improvements outside the
boundaries of Zone 3008 of County Service Area P-6 nor any land or improvements owned by any
governmental entity.
2. “Fiscal year” means the period of July 1 through the following June 30.
3. Contra Costa County Service Area P-6 Zone 3008 (hereinafter called “Zone”) means
that portion of unincorporated area of Contra Costa County located within the Zone’s boundaries
described and shown in Exhibits A and B attached hereto.
4. “Use Code” means the code number assigned by the Assessor of Contra Costa
County in order to classify parcels according to use for ad valorem property tax purposes. A copy
Ordinance No. 2021-28
2
of the Assessor’s use code classifications chart is attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated
herein.
5. “Consumer Price Index” means the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers
(CPI-U) for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Area (1982-84=100) as published by the U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. If the Consumer Price Index is discontinued or
revised, such other government index or computation with which it is replaced shall be used in
order to obtain substantially the same result as would be obtained if the Consumer Price Index had
not been discontinued of revised.
6. “Constant first year dollars” shall mean an actual dollar amount which, in years
subsequent to the first fiscal year the tax is levied, shall have the same purchasing power as the base
amount in first fiscal year dollars as measured by the Consumer Price Index. The base amount shall
be the amount of tax per parcel as specified in Article III 1A herein. The adjustment from actual to
constant dollars shall be made by use of the Consumer Price Index, as specified in Section III 1B
herein.
ARTICLE III. AMOUNT AND LEVEL OF TAXES
1. The tax per year on each parcel in the Zone shall not exceed the amount applicable to
the parcel as specified below.
A. For First Fiscal Year:
The tax per year for the first fiscal year (July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023) shall be the
Amount of Tax per Parcel for the Property Use Code Category as set forth in Exhibit D
incorporated herein.
B. For Subsequent Fiscal Years:
In order to keep the tax on each parcel in constant first year dollars for each fiscal year
subsequent to the first fiscal year, the tax per year shall by adjusted as set forth below to reflect any
increase in the Consumer Price Index beyond the first fiscal year a tax is levied.
In July, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County shall determine the amount of
taxes to be levied upon the parcels in the Zone for the then current fiscal year as set forth below.
For each Property Use Category on Exhibit C, the tax per year on each parcel for each fiscal
year subsequent to the first fiscal year shall be an amount determined as follows:
Tax Per Parcel Tax Per Parcel (Consumer Price Index
For Then Current = For Previous X for April of Immediately
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Preceding Fiscal Year)
(Consumer Price Index
For the first Fiscal Year
Of Levy)
Ordinance No. 2021-28
3
In no event shall the tax per parcel for any fiscal year be less than the amount established for the
first fiscal year.
2. The taxes levied on each parcel pursuant to this Article shall be a charge upon the
parcel and shall be due and collectible as set forth in Article IV, below. A complete listing of the
amount of taxes on each Zone shall be maintained by the Sheriff-Coroner of the County of Contra
Costa at Martinez, California, and be available for public inspection during the remainder of the
fiscal year for which such taxes are levied.
ARTICLE IV. COLLECTION AND ADMINISTRATION.
1. Taxes as Liens Against the Property.
The amount of taxes for each parcel each year shall constitute a lien on such property, in
accordance with Revenue and Taxation Code section 2187, and shall have the same effect as an ad
valorem real property tax lien until fully paid.
2. Collection.
The taxes on each parcel shall be billed on the secured roll tax bills for ad valorem property
taxes and shall be due the County of Contra Costa. Insofar as feasible and insofar as not inconsistent
with this Ordinance, the taxes are to be collected in the same manner in which the County collects
secured roll ad valorem property taxes. Insofar as feasible and insofar as not inconsistent with the
Ordinance, the times and procedure regarding exemptions, due dates, installment payments,
corrections, cancellations, refunds, late payments, penalties, liens, and collection for secured roll ad
valorem property taxes shall be applicable to the collection of this tax. Notwithstanding anything to
the contrary in the foregoing, as to this tax: 1) the secured roll tax bills shall be the only notices
required for this tax, and 2) the homeowner and veterans exemptions shall not be applicable because
such exemptions are determined by dollar amount value.
3. Costs of Administration by the County.
The reasonable costs incurred by the County officers collecting and administering this tax
shall be deducted from the collected taxes.
ARTICLE V. ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES.
1. Account.
Upon the levy and collection of the tax authorized by this ordinance, an account shall be
created into which the proceeds of the tax will be deposited. The proceeds of the tax authorized by
this Ordinance shall be applied only to the specific purposes identified in this Ordinance.
Ordinance No. 2021-28
4
2. Annual Report.
An annual report that complies with the requirements of Government Code section 50075.3
shall be filed with the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County no later than January 1 of each
fiscal year in which the tax is levied.
ARTICLE V. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE
If any article, section, subsection, sentence, phrase of clause of this Ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
Ordinance. The voters of the Zone hereby declare that they would have adopted the remainder of
the Ordinance, including each article, section, subsection, sentence phrase or clause, irrespective of
the invalidity of any other article, section, subsection, sentence, phrase or clause.
ARTICLE VI. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its confirmation by two-thirds of the
voters voting within Zone 3008 in an election to be held on December 14, 2021, so that taxes shall
first be collected hereunder for the tax year beginning July 1, 2022. Within 15 days of passage, this
Ordinance shall be published once, with the names of the Supervisors voting for and against it, in
the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation published in this County.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors, County
of Contra Costa, State of California, on October 12, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: MONICA NINO, Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors and County Administrator
By: __________________________ _____________________________________
Deputy Chair of the Board of Supervisors
[SEAL]
Order Number: 0131-622320ala
Page Number: 6
First American Title
Page 6 of 14
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Real property in the unincorporated area of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, described as
follows:
PORTION OF LOT A AND PORTION OF THE "70' ACCESS ROAD", DESIGNATED ON THE MAP OF, TARA
HILLS UNIT NO. 1, FILED NOVEMBER 20, 1951, MAP BOOK 45, PAGE 22 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
RECORDS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS;
BEGINNING AT THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT A, BEING ON THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF
O'HATCH DRIVE, AS SAID LOT AND DRIVE ARE DESIGNATED ON SAID MAP, 45 M 22, THENCE FROM
SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALONG SAID SOUTHWEST LINE, NORTH 58° 09' 07'' WEST, 255.02 FEET
AND NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 175 FEET, AN
ARC DISTANCE OF 77.87 FEET TO THE MOST EASTERLY CORNER OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED
IN THE RESOLUTION OF ABANDONMENT RECORDED JUNE 15, 1964, BOOK 4639, OFFICIAL RECORDS,
PAGE 834; THENCE ALONG THE EXTERIOR LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SAID
RESOLUTION. 4639 OFFICIAL RECORDS 834, AS FOLLOWS: NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A
CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 175 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 21.14 FEET; NORTH 31°
23' 55" WEST, 38.35 FEET, NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT
WITH A RADIUS OF 30 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90° 44' 48" AN ARC DISTANCE OF 47.37
FEET AND SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 4250
FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 139.97 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE PARCEL OF LAND FIRSTLY
DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO OSCAR H. LIEBERT, RECORDED JUNE 16, 1964, BOOK 4639, OFFICIAL
RECORDS, PAGE 282; THENCE ALONG THE EXTERIOR LINE OF SAID LIEBERT PARCEL, SOUTH 32° 39'
50" EAST, 131.68 FEET AND SOUTH 53° 30' 34" WEST, 123.5 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST LINE OF SAID
LOT A; THENCE ALONG THE EXTERIOR LINE OF SAID LOT A, AS FOLLOWS: SOUTH 36° 29' 26'' EAST,
101.53 FEET; SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A RADIUS OF 950
FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 95.18 FEET; SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF A COMPOUND CURVE TO
THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 50 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 27.74 FEET; SOUTHERLY, ALONG THE
ARC OF A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT WITH A RADIUS OF 50 FEET, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 27.74
FEET; SOUTH 30° 45' EAST, 16.80 FEET; NORTH 59° 15' EAST 377.79 FEET AND NORTH 31° 50' 53''
EAST, 54.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
APN: 403-202-011-9
Exhibit A
P:\Projects\2030053.50 Tara Hills San Pablo Final Map and Condos\DWG\Legals and Plats\County Requested Plat\Exhibit Plat.dwg 07/26/2021 - 02:26 PM woejl 1:1
Exhibit B, revised on July 26, 2021
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-28 ZONE 3008
FOR FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2022, THROUGH JUNE 30, 2023
EXHIBIT D
PROPERTY USE ANNUAL TAX
CODE CATEGORY EXPLANATION PER PARCEL
11 Single Family Residence –
1 residence, 1 site $200
12 Single Family Residence-
1 residence, 2 or more sites
$200
13 Single Family Residence-
2 residences on 1 or more sites
$200
14 Single Family Residence –
other than single family land
$200
15 Misc. Improvements – 1 site $200
16 Misc. Improvements – 2 or more sites $200
17 Vacant – 1 site $100
18 Vacant – 2 or more sites $100
19 Single Family Residence -
Det. w/common area
$200
20 Vacant – Multiple $100
21 Duplex $200
22 Triplex $200
23 Fourplex $200
24 Combination $200
25 Apartments (5-12 units) $400
26 Apartments (13-24 units) $400
27 Apartments (25-59 units) $600
28 Apartments (60+ units) $800
29 Attached PUDs:
Cluster Homes, Condos, Etc.
$200
30 Vacant – Commercial $100
31 Commercial Stores –
Not Supermarkets
$600
32 Small Grocery Stores
(7-11, etc.)
$600
33 Office Buildings $400
34 Medical, Dental $400
35 Service Stations, Car Wash $400
36 Garages $400
37 Community Facilities
(recreational, etc.)
$800
38 Golf Courses $400
39 Bowling Alleys $400
40 Boat Harbors $400
41 Supermarkets
(not shopping centers)
$600
42 Shopping Centers $800
43 Financial Buildings
(Ins., Title, Banks, S&L)
$400
44 Motels, Hotels & Mobile Home Parks $600
45 Theaters $600
46 Drive-In Theaters $400
47 Restaurants (not drive-in) $400
48 Multiple & Commercial $400
49 New Car Agencies $400
50 Vacant Land
(not part of Ind. Park or P. & D.)
$100
51 Industrial Park $800
52 Research & Development $400
53 Light Industrial $400
54 Heavy Industrial $400
55 Mini Warehouses (public storage) $600
56 Misc. Improvements $400
61 Rural, Res. Improvement 1A-10A $200
62 Rural, W/or w/o Structure 1A-10A $200
70 Convalescent Hospitals/Rest Homes $400
73 Hospitals $400
74 Cemeteries/Mortuaries $400
75 Fraternal & Service Organizations $400
76 Retirement Housing Complex $600
78 Parks & Playgrounds $800
85 Public & Private Parking $400
87 Common Area $400
88 Mobile Homes $200
89 Other (split parcels in different tax code areas) $200
99 Awaiting Assignment $200
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 09/14/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/280
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO FORM ZONE 3008 OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6 IN THE UNINCORPORATED
SAN PABLO AREA
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES:
1. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County proposes the formation of new zone in the unincorporated San Pablo area of
County Service Area (CSA) P-6, pursuant to Article 8 of Chapter 2.3 of Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the California
Government Code.
2. The boundaries of the territory to be included in the zone area are described in 'Exhibit A' and shown in 'Exhibit B', both of
which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
3. The formation of Zone 3008 is proposed to provide the County of Contra Costa with a method of financing an increased level
of police protection services to the area within the zone.
4. The proposed zone would provide a level of police protection services that exceeds the level of service outside the zone, and if
approved by the voters, the proposed zone would generate additional revenue in the form of special taxes to fund the increase in
this level of service.
5. The increase in the level of service would be financed through the levy of a voter-approved special tax on all taxable parcels
within the zone.
6. The name proposed for the zone is "Zone 3008" of CSA P-6.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT at 9:00 a.m. on October 12, 2021, in the Chamber of the Board of Supervisors,
County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, CA 94553, this Board will conduct a public hearing upon the
proposed formation of Zone 3008 of CSA P-6. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing by
(1) publishing a notice that complies with Government Code Section 25217, subdivision (d)(1), pursuant to Government Code
Section 6061; (2) mailing the notice to all owners of property within the proposed zone; (3) mailing the notice to each city and
special district that contains, or whose sphere of influence contains the proposed zone; and (4) verifying that the notice is posted
in at least three public places within the territory of the proposed zone.
Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925) 655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: September 14, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc:
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. OPEN the hearing on the proposed formation of Zone 3114 within County Service Area P-6;
CONSIDER all oral and written comments; and CLOSE the hearing.
2. DETERMINE whether a majority protest of the voters residing within the boundaries of proposed Zone
3114 exists pursuant to Government Code Section 25217.1(b)(1). In the event that the Board determines a
majority protest exists, TERMINATE the proceedings.
3. If the Board determines a majority protest does not exist, ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/325, attached
hereto, establishing Zone 3114 of County Service Area P-6 subject to voter approval of a special tax to fund
police protection services within the zone.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of establishing the Police Service District and the election is paid for by the developer of the
subdivision.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925)
655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Rosa Mena
D.6
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:HEARING TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED FORMATION OF ZONE 3114 IN THE COUNTY SERVICE AREA
OF P-6 IN THE EL SOBRANTE AREA OF THE COUNTY (DISTRICT I)
BACKGROUND:
Per the conditions of approval for Subdivision No. 9478 (County File #SD17-9478), prior to recording
the final map for the subdivision, the subdivider is required to establish a special police services tax
district for the subdivision in order to provide additional funding to augment police services in the area
of the subdivision. The property to be placed within the special tax district consists of a 6.4-acre site
located at 1098 Balmore Court in the El Sobrante area of the County.
On September 14, 2021, the Board granted conceptual approval for a December 14, 2021, ballot measure
seeking approval of a special tax to fund an increase in the level of police protection services that is
provided in the unincorporated Walnut Creek area of the County.
On September 14, 2021, the Board approved Resolution No. 2021/279, as required by Government Code
Section 25217, subdivision (b), as the first step in forming a new zone within County Service Area
(CSA) P-6. The proposed zone would serve as the vehicle to collect special taxes within the proposed
zone if a special tax measure is approved by voters on December 14, 2021.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 25217.1, subdivision (a), at the public hearing, the Board is
required to hear and consider any protests to the formation of the zone. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 25217.1, subdivision (b)(1), in the case of inhabited territory, if at the conclusion of the public
hearing, the Board determines that more than 50 percent of the total number of voters residing within
the proposed zone have filed written objections to the formation, then the Board shall determine that a
majority protest exists and terminate the proceedings.
If there is no majority protest, the Board may continue the proceedings to form the zone by adopting
Resolution No. 2021/325, which would establish Zone 3114 subject to voter approval of the special tax.
A separate hearing is also scheduled for October 12, 2021, to consider the adoption of an ordinance
authorizing the levy of the tax.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Zone 3114 would not be formed and the subdivider would be unable to comply with the conditions of
approval of the project. The subdivider would be unable to record the final map for the subdivision.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 2021/325
Exhibit A - Legal Description
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Resolution No. 2021/279
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed Resolution No. 2021/325
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 10/12/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/325
IN THE MATTER OF CREATING ZONE 3114 OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6 IN THE EL SOBRANTE AREA OF THE
COUNTY
WHEREAS, this Board recognizes the need for increased police protection services in the above subject zone and the difficulty
of funding the current or an increased level of services; and
WHEREAS, establishing the subject zone is a necessary step for the Board of Supervisors to seek voter approval of a special tax
for increased police protection services in the zone area. Government Code Sections 25217 and 25217.1 establish procedures for
the formation of a zone within a county service area;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BY THE BOARD RESOLVED THAT:
1. It is in the public interest to provide an increased level of police protection services in the area of proposed Zone 3114 of
County Service Area P-6.
2. A majority protest against the proposed formation of Zone 3114 does not exist, pursuant to Government Code Section
25217.1, subdivision (b).
3. Subject to voter approval of Ordinance No. 2021-27 on December 14, 2021, authorizing the levy of a special tax within
proposed Zone 3114, that portion of Contra Costa County Service Area P-6 described in Exhibit A attached hereto and shown in
Exhibit B attached hereto is established as Zone 3114 of County Service Area P-6, effective upon this Board’s adoption of a
resolution declaring the results of the December 14, 2021, election (“Effective Date”).
4. No affected properties located in Zone 3114 will be taxed for any existing bonded indebtedness or contractual obligations as a
result of the formation of said zone.
5. On or after the Effective Date, the Clerk of this Board shall cause the filing of a statement of the creation of said zone to be
made with the County Assessor and the State Board of Equalization (in Sacramento) pursuant to Government Code Sections
54900-54902. The filing shall include a map or plat indicating the boundaries of said zone.
Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925) 655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Rosa Mena
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 09/14/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/279
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO FORM ZONE 3114 OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6 IN THE EL SOBRANTE AREA
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES:
1. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County proposes the formation of new zone in the El Sobrante area of County
Service Area (CSA) P-6, pursuant to Article 8 of Chapter 2.3 of Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the California Government
Code.
2. The boundaries of the territory to be included in the zone area are described in 'Exhibit A' and shown in 'Exhibit B', both of
which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
3. The formation of Zone 3114 is proposed to provide the County of Contra Costa with a method of financing an increased level
of police protection services to the area within the zone.
4. The proposed zone would provide a level of police protection services that exceeds the level of service outside the zone, and if
approved by the voters, the proposed zone would generate additional revenue in the form of special taxes to fund the increase in
this level of service.
5. The increase in the level of service would be financed through the levy of a voter-approved special tax on all taxable parcels
within the zone.
6. The name proposed for the zone is "Zone 3114" of CSA P-6.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT at 9:00 a.m. on October 12, 2021, in the Chamber of the Board of Supervisors,
County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, CA 94553, this Board will conduct a public hearing upon the
proposed formation of Zone 3114 of CSA P-6. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing by
(1) publishing a notice that complies with Government Code Section 25217, subdivision (d)(1), pursuant to Government Code
Section 6061; (2) mailing the notice to all owners of property within the proposed zone; (3) mailing the notice to each city and
special district that contains, or whose sphere of influence contains the proposed zone; and (4) verifying that the notice is posted
in at least three public places within the territory of the proposed zone.
Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925) 655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: September 14, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc:
RECOMMENDATION(S):
1. OPEN hearing to consider adopting Ordinance No. 2021-27, authorizing the levy of a special tax for
police protection services in Zone 3114 of County Service area P-6 in the El Sobrante area of the County;
CONSIDER oral and written comments received; and CLOSE the public hearing.
2. ADOPT Ordinance No. 2021-27, attached hereto.
3. ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/326, attached hereto, authorizing an election in Zone 3114 of County
Service Area P-6 to consider approval of Ordinance No. 2021-27.
4. DIRECT the County Clerk, Elections Division, to conduct the election required by Government Code
Sections 23027 and 53978. This election shall be held on December 14, 2021.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of establishing the Police Service District and election is paid for by the developer of the
subdivision.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925)
655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Rosa Mena
D.7
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF PROPOSED SPECIAL TAX ORDINANCE AND AUTHORIZE
ELECTION TO OBTAIN VOTER APPROVAL (DISTRICT I)
BACKGROUND:
Per the conditions of approval for Subdivision No. 9478 (County File #SD17-9478), prior to recording
the final map for the subdivision, the subdivider is required to establish a special Police Services tax
district for the purposes of providing additional funding to augment police services in the area of the
subdivision. The property to be subdivided and placed within the proposed special tax district consists of
a 6.4-acre site located at 1098 Balmore Court in the El Sobrante area of the County.
On September 14, 2021, the Board approved Resolution No. 2021/279, as required by Government Code
Section 25217, subdivision (b), as the first step in forming a new zone within County Service Area
(CSA) P-6 in the El Sobrante area of the County. The proposed zone would serve as the vehicle to
collect special taxes within the boundaries of the zone if a special tax measure is approved by registered
voters within the zone area at the December 14, 2021, election.
The Board is scheduled to conduct a separate hearing on October 12, 2021, on the formation of the
proposed zone. If the Board determines there is no majority protest to the formation of this new zone,
and if the Board adopts Resolution No. 2021/325, establishing CSA P-6, Zone 3114 subject to voter
approval of the special tax, the next step in the process is the hearing on the adoption of a special tax
ordinance, the adoption of that ordinance and adoption of a resolution submitting the tax measure to the
voters.
In this action, the Board is asked to conduct the hearing on, and adopt, the special tax ordinance
(Ordinance No. 2021-27), which would authorize the levy of a special tax for police protection services
on all taxable parcels in the area of Zone 3114 if a special tax ballot measure is approved by a two-thirds
majority of the registered voters in the zone area. Resolution No. 2021/326, the adoption of which is also
recommended, sets forth appropriate ballot language, directs the County Clerk, Elections Division, to
conduct the aforementioned election as part of the December 14, 2021, election, and supplies
appropriate ballot language.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The project developer would be unable to comply with the conditions of approval for the project. The
developer would be unable to record the final map for the subdivision.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 2021/326
Exhibit A - Legal Description
Exhibit B - Plat Map
Exhibit C - Ordinance No. 2021-27
Resolution No. 2021/279
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed Resolution No. 2021/326
Signed Ordinance 2021-27
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 10/12/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/326
IN THE MATTER OF AUTHORIZING A SPECIAL TAX IN PROPOSED ZONE 3114 OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6
WHEREAS, this Board recognizes the need for increased police protection services in the above subject zone and the difficulty
of funding the current or an increased level of services. Government Code Sections 50077 and 53978 establish procedures for
voter authorization of a special tax in order to provide additional funding for police protection;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. Ordinance No. 2021-27, adopted on this date, is to be presented for approval of the voters of proposed Zone 3114 of County
Service Area P-6 at the election to be held on December 14, 2021, according to the following ballot proposition:
“Shall Ordinance No. 2021-27, to provide additional funding for police protection services, be approved to authorize a
special tax on property located in Zone 3114 of County Service Area P-6 in the El Sobrante area of the County, at an
initial annual amount of $200 per parcel for single-family, residential parcels, with higher and lower amounts for
properties in other use categories identified in the ordinance, commencing with the tax year beginning July 1, 2022?"
2. The Contra Costa County Registrar of Voters is designated as the Election Official for this election, and the County Clerk,
Elections Division, is hereby authorized and directed to provide all notices and take all other actions necessary to hold the
election described in this resolution including, but not limited to, providing notices of times within which arguments for and
against are to be submitted.
3. The County Administrator, or designee, shall serve as the Eligible Filer for purposes of filing necessary documents with the
Elections Official to facilitate listing of the above ballot proposition.
Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925) 655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Rosa Mena
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-27
(Uncodified)
(An Ordinance of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County)
Authorizing a Special Tax for Police Protection Services in Zone 3114
of County Service Area P-6
The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ORDAINS as follows:
ARTICLE I. PURPOSE AND INTENT. It is the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to
authorize the levy of a tax on parcels of real property on the secured property tax roll of Contra
Costa County that are within Zone 3114 of Contra Costa County Service Area No. P-6 in order to
augment funding for police protection services.
This tax is a special tax within the meaning of Section 4 of Article XIIIA of the California
Constitution. Because the burden of this tax falls upon property, this tax also is a property tax, but
this tax is not determined according to nor in any manner based upon the value of property; this tax
is levied on a parcel and use of property basis. Insofar as not inconsistent with this Ordinance or
with legislation authorizing special taxes and insofar as applicable to a property tax that is not based
on value, such provisions of the California Revenue and Taxation Code and of Article XIII of the
California Constitution as relate to ad valorem property taxes are intended to apply to the collection
and administration of this tax (Article IV of this Ordinance), as authorized by law.
The revenues raised by this tax are to be used solely for the purposes of obtaining,
furnishing, operating, and maintaining police protection equipment or apparatus, for paying the
salaries and benefits of police protection personnel, and for such other police protection service
expenses as are deemed necessary.
ARTICLE II. DEFINITIONS. The following definitions shall apply throughout the
Ordinance:
1. “Parcel” means the land and any improvements thereon, designated by an assessor’s
parcel map and parcel number and carried on the secured property tax roll of Contra Costa County.
For the purposes of the Ordinance, “parcel” does not include any land or improvements outside the
boundaries of Zone 3114 of County Service Area P-6 nor any land or improvements owned by any
governmental entity.
2. “Fiscal year” means the period of July 1 through the following June 30.
3. Contra Costa County Service Area P-6 Zone 3114 (hereinafter called “Zone”) means
that portion of unincorporated area of Contra Costa County located within the Zone’s boundaries
described and shown in Exhibits A and B attached hereto.
4. “Use Code” means the code number assigned by the Assessor of Contra Costa
County in order to classify parcels according to use for ad valorem property tax purposes. A copy
Ordinance No. 2021-27
2
of the Assessor’s use code classifications chart is attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated
herein.
5. “Consumer Price Index” means the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers
(CPI-U) for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Area (1982-84=100) as published by the U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. If the Consumer Price Index is discontinued or
revised, such other government index or computation with which it is replaced shall be used in
order to obtain substantially the same result as would be obtained if the Consumer Price Index had
not been discontinued of revised.
6. “Constant first year dollars” shall mean an actual dollar amount which, in years
subsequent to the first fiscal year the tax is levied, shall have the same purchasing power as the base
amount in first fiscal year dollars as measured by the Consumer Price Index. The base amount shall
be the amount of tax per parcel as specified in Article III 1A herein. The adjustment from actual to
constant dollars shall be made by use of the Consumer Price Index, as specified in Section III 1B
herein.
ARTICLE III. AMOUNT AND LEVEL OF TAXES
1. The tax per year on each parcel in the Zone shall not exceed the amount applicable to
the parcel as specified below.
A. For First Fiscal Year:
The tax per year for the first fiscal year (July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023) shall be the
Amount of Tax per Parcel for the Property Use Code Category as set forth in Exhibit D
incorporated herein.
B. For Subsequent Fiscal Years:
In order to keep the tax on each parcel in constant first year dollars for each fiscal year
subsequent to the first fiscal year, the tax per year shall by adjusted as set forth below to reflect any
increase in the Consumer Price Index beyond the first fiscal year a tax is levied.
In July, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County shall determine the amount of
taxes to be levied upon the parcels in the Zone for the then current fiscal year as set forth below.
For each Property Use Category on Exhibit C, the tax per year on each parcel for each fiscal
year subsequent to the first fiscal year shall be an amount determined as follows:
Tax Per Parcel Tax Per Parcel (Consumer Price Index
For Then Current = For Previous X for April of Immediately
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Preceding Fiscal Year)
(Consumer Price Index
For the first Fiscal Year
Of Levy)
Ordinance No. 2021-27
3
In no event shall the tax per parcel for any fiscal year be less than the amount established for the
first fiscal year.
2. The taxes levied on each parcel pursuant to this Article shall be a charge upon the
parcel and shall be due and collectible as set forth in Article IV, below. A complete listing of the
amount of taxes on each Zone shall be maintained by the Sheriff-Coroner of the County of Contra
Costa at Martinez, California, and be available for public inspection during the remainder of the
fiscal year for which such taxes are levied.
ARTICLE IV. COLLECTION AND ADMINISTRATION.
1. Taxes as Liens Against the Property.
The amount of taxes for each parcel each year shall constitute a lien on such property, in
accordance with Revenue and Taxation Code section 2187, and shall have the same effect as an ad
valorem real property tax lien until fully paid.
2. Collection.
The taxes on each parcel shall be billed on the secured roll tax bills for ad valorem property
taxes and shall be due the County of Contra Costa. Insofar as feasible and insofar as not inconsistent
with this Ordinance, the taxes are to be collected in the same manner in which the County collects
secured roll ad valorem property taxes. Insofar as feasible and insofar as not inconsistent with the
Ordinance, the times and procedure regarding exemptions, due dates, installment payments,
corrections, cancellations, refunds, late payments, penalties, liens, and collection for secured roll ad
valorem property taxes shall be applicable to the collection of this tax. Notwithstanding anything to
the contrary in the foregoing, as to this tax: 1) the secured roll tax bills shall be the only notices
required for this tax, and 2) the homeowner and veterans exemptions shall not be applicable because
such exemptions are determined by dollar amount value.
3. Costs of Administration by the County.
The reasonable costs incurred by the County officers collecting and administering this tax
shall be deducted from the collected taxes.
ARTICLE V. ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES.
1. Account.
Upon the levy and collection of the tax authorized by this ordinance, an account shall be
created into which the proceeds of the tax will be deposited. The proceeds of the tax authorized by
this Ordinance shall be applied only to the specific purposes identified in this Ordinance.
Ordinance No. 2021-27
4
2. Annual Report.
An annual report that complies with the requirements of Government Code section 50075.3
shall be filed with the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County no later than January 1 of each
fiscal year in which the tax is levied.
ARTICLE V. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE
If any article, section, subsection, sentence, phrase of clause of this Ordinance is for any
reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this
Ordinance. The voters of the Zone hereby declare that they would have adopted the remainder of
the Ordinance, including each article, section, subsection, sentence phrase or clause, irrespective of
the invalidity of any other article, section, subsection, sentence, phrase or clause.
ARTICLE VI. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its confirmation by two-thirds of the
voters voting within Zone 3114 in an election to be held on December 14, 2021, so that taxes shall
first be collected hereunder for the tax year beginning July 1, 2022. Within 15 days of passage, this
Ordinance shall be published once, with the names of the Supervisors voting for and against it, in
the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation published in this County.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors, County
of Contra Costa, State of California, on October 12, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: MONICA NINO, Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors and County Administrator
By: __________________________ _____________________________________
Deputy Chair of the Board of Supervisors
[SEAL]
ORDINANCE NO. 2021-27 ZONE 3114
FOR FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 2022, THROUGH JUNE 30, 2023
EXHIBIT D
PROPERTY USE ANNUAL TAX
CODE CATEGORY EXPLANATION PER PARCEL
11 Single Family Residence –
1 residence, 1 site $200
12 Single Family Residence-
1 residence, 2 or more sites
$200
13 Single Family Residence-
2 residences on 1 or more sites
$200
14 Single Family Residence –
other than single family land
$200
15 Misc. Improvements – 1 site $200
16 Misc. Improvements – 2 or more sites $200
17 Vacant – 1 site $100
18 Vacant – 2 or more sites $100
19 Single Family Residence -
Det. w/common area
$200
20 Vacant – Multiple $100
21 Duplex $200
22 Triplex $200
23 Fourplex $200
24 Combination $200
25 Apartments (5-12 units) $400
26 Apartments (13-24 units) $400
27 Apartments (25-59 units) $600
28 Apartments (60+ units) $800
29 Attached PUDs:
Cluster Homes, Condos, Etc.
$200
30 Vacant – Commercial $100
31 Commercial Stores –
Not Supermarkets
$600
32 Small Grocery Stores
(7-11, etc.)
$600
33 Office Buildings $400
34 Medical, Dental $400
35 Service Stations, Car Wash $400
36 Garages $400
37 Community Facilities
(recreational, etc.)
$800
38 Golf Courses $400
39 Bowling Alleys $400
40 Boat Harbors $400
41 Supermarkets
(not shopping centers)
$600
42 Shopping Centers $800
43 Financial Buildings
(Ins., Title, Banks, S&L)
$400
44 Motels, Hotels & Mobile Home Parks $600
45 Theaters $600
46 Drive-In Theaters $400
47 Restaurants (not drive-in) $400
48 Multiple & Commercial $400
49 New Car Agencies $400
50 Vacant Land
(not part of Ind. Park or P. & D.)
$100
51 Industrial Park $800
52 Research & Development $400
53 Light Industrial $400
54 Heavy Industrial $400
55 Mini Warehouses (public storage) $600
56 Misc. Improvements $400
61 Rural, Res. Improvement 1A-10A $200
62 Rural, W/or w/o Structure 1A-10A $200
70 Convalescent Hospitals/Rest Homes $400
73 Hospitals $400
74 Cemeteries/Mortuaries $400
75 Fraternal & Service Organizations $400
76 Retirement Housing Complex $600
78 Parks & Playgrounds $800
85 Public & Private Parking $400
87 Common Area $400
88 Mobile Homes $200
89 Other (split parcels in different tax code areas) $200
99 Awaiting Assignment $200
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 09/14/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/279
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO FORM ZONE 3114 OF COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6 IN THE EL SOBRANTE AREA
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES:
1. The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County proposes the formation of new zone in the El Sobrante area of County
Service Area (CSA) P-6, pursuant to Article 8 of Chapter 2.3 of Part 2 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the California Government
Code.
2. The boundaries of the territory to be included in the zone area are described in 'Exhibit A' and shown in 'Exhibit B', both of
which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
3. The formation of Zone 3114 is proposed to provide the County of Contra Costa with a method of financing an increased level
of police protection services to the area within the zone.
4. The proposed zone would provide a level of police protection services that exceeds the level of service outside the zone, and if
approved by the voters, the proposed zone would generate additional revenue in the form of special taxes to fund the increase in
this level of service.
5. The increase in the level of service would be financed through the levy of a voter-approved special tax on all taxable parcels
within the zone.
6. The name proposed for the zone is "Zone 3114" of CSA P-6.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT at 9:00 a.m. on October 12, 2021, in the Chamber of the Board of Supervisors,
County Administration Building, 1025 Escobar Street, Martinez, CA 94553, this Board will conduct a public hearing upon the
proposed formation of Zone 3114 of CSA P-6. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to give notice of the public hearing by
(1) publishing a notice that complies with Government Code Section 25217, subdivision (d)(1), pursuant to Government Code
Section 6061; (2) mailing the notice to all owners of property within the proposed zone; (3) mailing the notice to each city and
special district that contains, or whose sphere of influence contains the proposed zone; and (4) verifying that the notice is posted
in at least three public places within the territory of the proposed zone.
Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925) 655-2867
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: September 14, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc:
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT the Measure X Community Advisory Board Report to the Contra Costa County Board of
Supervisors, APPROVE the advisory board’s request for $20,000 to contract for assistance in compiling
and writing an updated formal Needs Assessment report, and DIRECT that this matter return to the Board
on November 2, 2021 to provide direction to staff.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Accepting the report is an administrative action with no immediate fiscal impact. Future actions of the
Board will include allocating in excess of $100,000,000 in Measure X sales tax revenue (general purpose
revenues). If the request for a report writer is granted, the cost would be $20,000.
BACKGROUND:
See attached report from the Measure X Community Advisory Board.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Report will not be accepted by the Board of Supervisors, which will delay funding projects.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance
Director (925) 655-2047
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the
minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc: All County Departments (via CAO)
D.8
To:Board of Supervisors
From:MEASURE X Com Advisory Board
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Measure X Community Advisory Board report to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Speakers: Raul Vasquez; Susan, Concord; Lisa Kirk; Ilsa Stephens, ACCE; Reverend Sophi
DeWitt, East Bay Housing Organization; Roxanne Garza; GiGi Crowder; Debbie Toth; Jane,
David Sharples, ACCE; Diana Hoenig; Larry Best, California Emergine Technoloty EP Fund;
Mary Blumberg Nalgoza, Gen Vocal For Victims; Jan Warren; Francisco Torres, ACCE;
Veronica Benjamin; Susan Boreliaz, Diablo Valley Ballet; Jann Intereset; Joanne Supersad; Dan
Geiger; Sean Gilbert; Susan; Cheryl Sudduth. Written correspondence received from Amanda
Brown-Steverns, Executive Director, Greenbelt Alliance; Susan Boreliz, Executive Director,
Diablo Ballet; Mary Knox, President, Board of Directors, getVOCAL for Victims (attached).
ACCEPTED the Measure X Community Advisory Board Report; SCHEDULED the advisory board’s
request for $20,000 to contract for assistance in compiling and writing an updated formal Needs
Assessment report to return to the Board on November 2, 2021.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Measure X Community Advisory Board report to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors
PowerPoint Presentation
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Correspondence Received
1
Measure X Community Advisory Board
report to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors
October 6, 2021
Submitted by Mariana Moore, Chair, and BK Williams, Vice Chair,
on behalf of the Measure X Community Advisory Board
The purpose of this report is to summarize the work completed by Contra
Costa’s Measure X Community Advisory Board (“Advisory Board”) during the
past six months, following the Advisory Board’s creation by the Contra Costa
Board of Supervisors. The report contains three sections:
1. Background information on Measure X and the Community Advisory
Board, and a summary of the Advisory Board’s efforts and
accomplishments to date.
2. A summary of the issues explored during the Community Needs
Assessment process. (Note that a separate, formal Needs
Assessment report will be completed over the next few months; the
Advisory Board has requested an allocation of up to $20,000 from
Measure X funds to contract with a consultant to assist in compiling
and writing the report.
3. The Advisory Board’s recommended funding priorities for Fiscal
Year 2021-22.
1. BACKGROUND ON MEASURE X COMMUNITY ADVISORY BOARD
On November 3, 2020, voters in Contra Costa approved Measure X, a
countywide, 20-year, half-cent sales tax.
The ballot measure language stated the intent of Measure X as “to keep
Contra Costa’s regional hospital open and staffed; fund community health
centers, emergency response; support crucial safety-net services; invest in
early childhood services; protect vulnerable populations; and for other
essential county services.”
The Measure X Community Advisory Board was established on February 2,
2021, to advise the Board of Supervisors on the use of Measure X funds. The
Advisory Board consists of 17 members, comprising 10 Supervisorial District
appointees (2 per Supervisorial District) and 7 At-Large members. The
Advisory Board also includes 10 alternates, who are expected to attend all
regular Advisory Board meetings and may participate fully, except that they
may not vote unless substituting for an absent member.
2
The responsibilities of the Advisory Board, according to its bylaws, include:
1. Overseeing an annual assessment of community needs, focusing primarily
on the priority areas identified in the Needs Assessment, including
emergency response (fire/medical), health care, safety net services,
preventative care, affordable housing, and supports for early childhood,
youth, families, and seniors.
2. Creating detailed priority lists of the top ten service gaps (county- and
community-provided) based on the results from the needs assessment.
3. Using the assessment to make general funding priority recommendations
to the Board of Supervisors on 95% of the revenue generated by Measure
X.
4. Providing an annual report on the outcomes and impact of allocated
funds.
5. The Advisory Board committee shall initially meet as needed and
thereafter shall meet quarterly.
On April 6, 2021, the Board of Supervisors appointed the inaugural members
of the new Measure X Community Advisory Board.
Current members of the Measure X Community Advisory Board include:
District I: BK Williams (Vice Chair), Edith Pastrano; Cathy Hanville
(alternate)
District II: Kathy Chiverton, Jim Cervantes; Steven Bliss (alternate)
District III: David Cruise, Odessa Lefrancois; Sandro Trujillo (alternate)
District IV: Sharon Quesada Jenkins, Michelle Hernandez; Pello Walker
(alternate)
District V: Michelle Stewart, Ali Saidi; Gigi Crowder (alternate)
At-large members: Kimberly Aceves-Iniguez, Ruth Fernandez, Susun Kim,
Mariana Moore (Chair), Jerry Short, Debbie Toth, Sandra Wall
At-large alternates: Peter Benson, Genoveva Calloway, Diana Honig, Lindy
Johnson, Melissa Stafford Jones
Advisory Board launch and activities, April-September 2021
The first meeting of the Advisory Board was held April 13, 2021. Members
decided to meet every Wednesday at 5:00 pm, via Zoom, in order to
conduct an updated Community Needs Assessment as expeditiously as
possible.
3
During the subsequent months, the Advisory Board met a total of 25 times
(as of Sept. 22), with each meeting lasting from two to 4.5 hours. Every
meeting was well-attended by community stakeholders and members of the
public, with attendance consistently growing over time to a high of 133
participants. Total attendance during the needs assessment portion of the
Advisory Body’s work was 940, including Advisory Board members,
presenters, county staff, and members of the general public.
Language Access and Inclusion
The Advisory Board also took action to support language access and equity,
including requesting Measure X funds from the Board of Supervisors to
provide simultaneous Spanish-language interpretation at all Measure X
Community Advisory Board meetings, as well as translation of the meeting
agendas and other materials on the County’s Measure X Community
Advisory Board web page. American Sign Language (ASL) interpretation was
also provided at Advisory Board meetings. Both interpretation services were
utilized frequently by members of the public, enabling their full participation
in Advisory Board presentations and deliberations. The Advisory Board
appreciated the County’s support in providing these language access
services.
Measure X Vision Statement and Operating principles
In April 2021, the Advisory Board adopted a formal Vision Statement and
Operating Principles to guide their work, as summarized below.
VISION STATEMENT
Contra Costa County will have the necessary funds to invest in and sustain a
robust system of care and the social and public services necessary to
support a vibrant community and ensure that all county residents have
equitable opportunities to thrive.
OPERATING PRINCIPLES
1. Shared responsibility to practice the values of equity, justice, inclusion
and compassion.
2. Sustaining a strong social safety net is important for the health and
prosperity of all.
3. Investments will prioritize prevention as well as addressing current
system gaps.
4. Investments will help leverage other funding sources when feasible.
5. Needs and issues are intersectional and interconnected. Think about
needs and services from the point of view of residents.
4
6. Name inequities and disparities, and be specific in naming and
recognizing those who are most harmed by them, especially Black and
Latinx residents. Additional areas of focus include residents with
mental health needs, indigenous people, Asian American/Pacific
Islander American residents, seniors, disabled people, children and
youth (prenatal to adult), immigrants, unsheltered and homeless
residents, rural communities, LGBTQ+ residents, and poor people.
7. Economic opportunity and equity are at the heart of our purpose.
8. Seek transformative solutions, in addition to filling current service
gaps.
9. Fostering a culture of inclusion, welcoming, and belonging
demonstrates our commitment to equity and will improve our work
process and outcomes.
Rules of Conduct for Advisory Board meetings (adopted April 2021)
1. Consider not repeating a point someone else has already made (or
briefly agree).
2. Treat each other and all participants with mutual respect.
3. Be curious; practice active listening; seek to understand.
4. To fully embody our principle of inclusion: Support the accessibility
needs of all participants to the extent feasible, including language
access (interpretation and translation), technical support, and
visual/audio support.
2. COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT PROCESS:
The original needs assessment was completed in 2019, before the onset of
the COVID-19 pandemic, racial reckoning, and other significant events that
deeply affected the residents of Contra Costa County. Accordingly, the
Advisory Board decided to undertake a comprehensive review of community
needs to take into account current community needs, strengths, and
resources, and to identify potential strategies to address those needs, as the
basis to make funding recommendations for FY 2021-22. After developing an
initial list of community needs, issues, and topics, the following schedule of
Advisory Board discussions was established, with each presentation featuring
a panel comprising county program staff, community-based service
providers, and residents who have been directly impacted by the issues
being discussed.
5
● May 12, 2021 Seniors, Veterans, and Persons with Disabilities
● May 19, 2021 Community Safety: Fire Protection
● May 26, 2021 Early Childhood
● June 9, 2021 Youth and Young Adults
● June 23, 2021 Mental & Behavioral Health/Disabled
● June 30, 2021 Housing & Homelessness
● July 7, 2021 Community Safety: Justice Systems
● July 14, 2021 Safety Net Services
● July 21, 2021 Immigration/Racial Equity Across Systems
● July 28, 2021 Library, Arts & Culture, Agriculture
● August 4, 2021 Environment & Transportation
A total of 94 subject matter experts -- including county program staff,
community-based program staff, and residents with lived experience --
shared their expertise with the Advisory Board and the public during these
presentations. The data and materials submitted by presenters are
contained in Advisory Board meeting records. Collectively, they provided a
wealth of information about community needs, trends, service gaps, and
potential solutions. This material, along with significant additional data and
ideas shared during public comment, form the basis of the updated
Community Needs Assessment that is being prepared for submission to the
Board of Supervisors.
Following the final panel presentation in early August, the Advisory Board
requested and received additional information from some prior presenters,
and also received additional input from members of the public. The Advisory
Board then developed and implemented a variety of tools and processes,
including conducting three straw polls, to aid in identifying service gaps,
determining areas of alignment, and developing shared funding priorities.
On September 22, Advisory Board members voted unanimously to approve
the following funding priority recommendations for FY 2021-22, to submit to
the Board of Supervisors. The funding recommendations are grouped into
five Goal areas: Mental Well-being, Equity in Action, Healthy Communities,
Intergenerational Thriving, and Welcoming and Safe Community.
Beginning on the following page, the Advisory Board is pleased to present
their recommended funding priorities under each Goal area, followed by a
description of Additional Considerations that Advisory Board members
6
believed were important to bring to the attention of the Board of
Supervisors.
Recommended Funding Priorities for Measure X Funds in
FY 21-22
The Advisory Board’s funding recommendations are grouped into five goal
areas: Mental Well-Being, Equity in Action, Healthy Communities,
Intergenerational Thriving, and Welcoming & Safe Community.
The recommended strategies listed under each goal area were rated as Top
Priority by at least 51% of Advisory Board members who participated in the
survey poll conducted during the meeting on September 8, 2021.
Note: The number listed in parentheses at the end of each strategy reflects
the relative ranking of that strategy in the September 8 poll; an asterisk
indicates a tie in the rankings.
GOAL 1: MENTAL WELL-BEING
We strive to be a community that supports the mental and
behavioral health well-being of all residents, through prevention,
crisis response services, intersectional supports, and innovative
cross-sector approaches.
Strategies
1. Community-based mental health: Crisis Response Initiative (1)
2. Childhood mental health services: Community grants to local
community health service providers serving younger children (age 0-5)
to improve children’s social and emotional development as a
preventive strategy (2)
3. Community-based mental health services: Addressing the needs of at-
risk populations (5*)
4. Substance Abuse Treatment (community-based) (11)
5. Mental health services for Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI)
community (14)
6. Community-based mental health for LGBTQ+ individuals (22*)
7. Medical response to mental health crisis: San Ramon Valley Fire model
(26*)
7
GOAL 2: EQUITY IN ACTION
We strive to be a community that prioritizes equity and removes
structural barriers that cause inequities and poverty, so that all
residents can thrive.
Strategies
1. County Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice (4)
2. East County community-based equity center (based on the Contra
Costa County Racial Justice Coalition presentation) (12)
3. Removal defense and case management for immigrant residents, via
Stand Together Contra Costa: including legal representation across
court systems and social service workers to provide holistic, language-
accessible, culturally-responsive social services and navigation. (14*)
4. Community-based and schools-based arts programs (17)
5. Immigration-based legal services (25*)
6. Arts & Culture Commission programs (22)
7. Innovation fund (to facilitate community-based responses to service
needs) (26)
8. Community-based asylum support for LGBTQ+ individuals and
immigrants (27)
GOAL 3: HEALTHY COMMUNITIES
We strive to be a community in which all residents have access to
affordable, timely, culturally-responsive healthcare; adequate
housing; high-quality childcare; and nutritious food, all of which has
become more urgent as we address the ravages of the pandemic.
Ranked Strategies
1. Expanded and comprehensive healthcare for remaining uninsured
residents via Contra Costa CARES (5*)
2. Local Housing Trust Fund (6): Serve as a funding mechanism for
County housing programs, including: tenant assistance; assistance for
unsheltered residents; the acquisition, preservation and rehabilitation
of affordable housing; creation of permanently affordable housing;
affordable housing for people with developmental disabilities;
community land trusts (19); and permanent supportive housing.
8
3. Tenant legal services and supports, both county-based and
community-based (8)
4. Subsidized child care (9*)
5. Permanent housing subsidies for youth and young adults (18)
6. Community-based food distribution (23)
7. Community-based training & employment (26)
GOAL 4: INTERGENERATIONAL THRIVING
We strive to be a community that intentionally strengthens and
provides support for all residents and for family members of all
generations, including children, youth, and older adults.
Strategies
1. Services for children with disabilities: Improve access to
comprehensive services that support children with disabilities to be
independent and included in society. This strategy could include
vouchers to providers on behalf of families for necessary services.
Provide childcare providers with consultation and guidance to modify
their services and programs to be inclusive of all children. (5*)
2. Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan (ATS) (7)
3. Community-based youth centers/services in Central and East County
(10)
4. Community-based aging services (13)
5. Guaranteed income pilot (15)
6. East County multi-agency for disabled (22*)
7. Master Plan on Aging local implementation (22)
8. Community-based restorative justice (24)
9. County family support services (26*)
10. Discretionary funds for Child Protective Services and foster youth
(26*)
9
GOAL 5: WELCOMING & SAFE COMMUNITY
We strive to be a community where all residents feel safe and
welcome, and receive emergency help when they need it.
Strategies
1. East County Fire Services (3)
2. Re-open closed stations (9*)
3. Public Defender front-end advocacy teams (12*)
4. Fire/wildfire mitigation/fuel reduction (16)
5. Community-based reentry support services (21*)
6. Community-based employment services (21*)
7. Abuse prevention and support, including building sustainable
infrastructure, civil & legal assistance, community victim advocates,
community connectedness, flexible financial assistance, and public
health (25*)
8. Rental assistance for immigrants (27)
9. Reimagine Public Safety initiative - countywide (28*)
10. Seasonal fire staffing (28*)
11. Multicultural wellness center for Nepali/AAPI residents (29)
Additional Considerations
1. Prioritizing community-based strengths, wisdom, and services:
Whenever possible, prioritize funding to community-embraced and
community-based programs and services. This may include grants from
the “Innovation Fund” (see Goal 2, item 7) that can be given to
community programs that may not have 501(c)(3) status but are deeply
trusted by local community members.
2. Addressing racism: Racism is the root cause of many of the problems
our community faces. All services must prioritize addressing structural
and systemic racism.
10
3. Addressing trauma: Racism and other social and economic inequities
are a major cause of trauma, and trauma is a public health issue. All
programs receiving Measure X funding should adhere to trauma-informed
practices, i.e., assuming that an individual is likely to have a history of
trauma, and recognizing and addressing the presence and impact of
trauma symptoms.
4. Bold and transformational focus: The Advisory Board encourages the
Board of Supervisors to prioritize Measure X funds for programs that are
bold, innovative, and transformational. There are many gaps in existing
services to be filled, but the Advisory Board also supports new strategies
that have the potential to be life-changing for members of our
community. As a part of this philosophy, we encourage the County to
prioritize programs with staff who have lived experience. We also
encourage prioritizing preventative, community-defined strategies that
address structural root causes.
5. Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers. The
Advisory Board recognizes that the need for a strong hospital and clinic
system were key elements in the Measure X ballot measure language.
The Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers (and
related clinics) provide critical services to the most vulnerable members
of our community, and it is imperative that they remain financially
viable. In light of the fact that the Advisory Board did not receive a clear
funding request for this purpose from County Health Services, we leave
it to the Board of Supervisors to make such a funding decision. We do
ask that the Board of Supervisors balance that potential funding decision
with other urgent community needs and priorities as identified by the
Advisory Board and described in this report.
6. Prioritizing Measure X funds in the context of the overall County
budget. The Advisory Board spent months receiving and reviewing
information regarding unmet community needs, and spent significant
time in discussing processes to develop funding recommendations. This
prioritization process was very challenging, given the depth of needs in
the community and the limited amount of Measure X funding available.
The Advisory Board received over $350 million in total funding requests,
and recognizes that there are many additional community needs that
were not formally brought to their attention. There are many worthy
strategies and programs presented to the Advisory Board that are
11
important, but that did not rank in the top 29 strategies as determined
by the 51% threshold established for the September 8 Advisory Board
member survey poll. Given that Measure X funds represent just 2% of
the County’s overall annual revenue, we encourage the County to
identify other County, state, and federal revenue sources to fund these
additional worthwhile programs. We encourage the County to maximize
and leverage funding wherever possible, and to ensure that Measure X is
the funding of last resort. We also encourage the County to distribute
funds to community providers as expeditiously as possible, removing
traditional obstacles in the RFP process, in recognition of the importance
of addressing the urgent needs of the community in an expeditious
manner.
Acknowledgments
The Measure X Community Advisory Board wishes to acknowledge and
appreciate the participation of Lisa Driscoll and Enid Mendoza, both of whom
work in the County Administrator’s Office, for providing significant staffing
and logistical support for the work of the Advisory Board. From preparing
agendas and other meeting materials, to guiding the Advisory Board’s
adherence to public meeting protocols, to arranging for language
interpretation, to managing the complex technical requirements for
conducting virtual public meetings, Ms. Driscoll and Ms. Mendoza were
consistently exemplary in their willingness to go above and beyond
(including working late into the evening on a weekly basis) to support the
Advisory Board in fulfilling their important duties.
Attachments:
A. Original Needs Assessment
B. Results of 9/8/21 MXCAB Meeting Poll (Final Poll)
C. Results of 8/20/21 MXCAB Meeting Polls
D. MXCAB Meeting agendas, Records of Action, Panel Presentations, and
Written Public Comment from all MXCAB meetings are available on the
County intranet by meeting date at this link:
http://64.166.146.245/agenda_publish.cfm?id=&mt=ALL
In March, a local emergency was declared in Contra Costa County in response to Covid-19.¹
Such poignant examples of how interconnected our health and wellness is have not been
felt since the Great Depression. To date, over 30 million jobless claims have been filed in the
United States. Contra Costa County is feeling the impacts as more individuals and families are
finding new ways to stay housed, keep food on the table, and receive necessary medical care.
Even before the recent Covid-19 pandemic, Contra Costa County faced extreme public health risks arising from
shortages in county budgeting and spending. With over 150 eligibility worker vacancies, Contra Costa County’s
most vulnerable residents struggle to obtain life-saving and stabilizing services. A $32 million budget gap at the
County Hospital is likely to be an increasing cost and may result in the closure of invaluable health programs
and staff redundancies. Coupled with a lack of funding for necessary medical practitioners at community-based
health resources, it is clear that the emergency preparedness for the county and residents must be addressed.
As funding dries up and vital public and nonprofit services become less accessible, residents are experiencing
increased wait times for health and safety-net services. County first responders are reporting an uptick in non-
emergency call-outs as residents are lacking options on where and how to obtain the care they need.
As the adage goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. To shore up access to medical and
behavioral health services, and bolster county safety-net programs, the Board of Supervisors has charged us with
assessing the needs of our county residents in the context of a potential 0.5% sales tax increase.
01CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Findings
•As many cities within, and the County overall, are struggling with budget deficits, the COVID-19
response has exposed the need for new revenue streams to support county residents during
unprecedented emergencies.
•Under-investment in preventative and safety-net services is creating an increase in costs to
taxpayers and county coffers.
•Without the financial resources to fund resident health, safety-net, affordable housing and early
childcare services, inexorably taxpayers are spending more to address bigger problems arising from
shortfalls in the accessibility and availability of early interventions.
•Targeted investments would save the county money by reducing emergency service expenditures.
•As part of County emergency medical preparedness, it is imperative that the County Hospital,
medical clinics and community-based health resources remain accessible and available for
residents.
•By creating a new revenue source, the county can reduce the dependence on money from the
general fund in addressing county public health and safety-net needs.
1 https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/03/12/coronavirus-number-of-confirmed-cases-in-contra-costa-county-is-up-to-16/
Attachment A
“Before being enrolled in CARES, managing
my diabetes was more difficult. I often missed
work when my blood sugar was too high. With
CARES, I don’t have to worry about the cost of
the appointment or lab tests. And Brookside
keeps me on track by calling me when it’s time
for my next appointment. Having access to
medicine has helped stabilize my health.”
- County Resident
“During a regular check-up, I saw a child who
exhibited behavioral problems and other signs
of urgent mental health challenges. I initially
referred the family to a mental health service
provider in the same clinic, but due to restrictions
the clinic was unable to treat the child without
a diagnosis. I then referred them to a non-profit
service provider, but their waiting list was too
long. Finally, I reached out to a mental health
provider that I know personally in hopes that my
young patient could be seen. However, a few
months later at my patient’s next check-up, the
child was still awaiting diagnosis as the parent
had not heard from any of the providers which I
attempted to refer them to.”
- Local Pediatrician
“Since the Family Justice Center began tracking
interpersonal violence data in 2015, we have
observed an uptick in domestic violence,
violence against children and elders, sexual
assault, and human trafficking in Contra Costa
County. By removing barriers to services,
victims have found it easier to seek the
interventions they need to change their lived
experience. As we enter week 7 of the regional
shelter-in-place order, we are witnessing an
alarming increase in police reports of domestic
abuse, and anecdotal stories of child and elder
abuse. But the fact that formal child abuse
reports have declined by 50% and elder abuse
by 30% since shelter-in-place began makes
all of us worried. In times of county emergency
and prosperity, reliable public funding is critical
to protect the vulnerable in our community and
break cycles of abuse.”
- Susun Kim
Executive Director
02
Voices from the
Community
Needs Assessment:
Health and Emergency Services
County health services require a new funding source to keep
facilities open and preserve the accessibility of medical care
so that any patient – regardless of income or background
– can receive the treatment they need to maintain their
wellness. The County’s ability to respond to emergencies
and provide crisis funding for both emergency services and
medical facilities has been accentuated during COVID-19.
Even before the current pandemic, residents faced
the closure of the county’s only public hospital and
medical clinics which provide life-saving care within
our community. Already Contra Costa Regional Medical
Center has seen a hiring freeze that has impacted hiring
and forced some clinics to cut hours.
In addition to the county hospital, community-based
health care clinics, like La Clínica de la Raza, are integral to
providing quality care to vulnerable populations in Contra
Costa County. More than ever, it is critical to ensure that
these clinics have the funds that they need to employ
appropriate numbers of healthcare professionals to meet
the cultural and geographic needs of county residents.
To ensure community health, fire districts across the
county must operate efficiently and effectively. Since
July 20172, a lack of funding in East Contra Costa has
resulted in the operation of only 3 east county stations
covering 259 square miles and over 120,000 residents.
This lack of resources has placed additional pressure on
neighboring fire districts, mainly the Contra Costa County
Fire Protection District, which now respond to east county
emergencies four times out of every one occasion that an
east county station has capacity to respond.
Determinants of wellness extend beyond physical and
mental health care and are further described in the
safety-net section of this report.
The needs of public and community health facilities
include:
Backfill funding for the current hospital deficit
Adequate medical provider staffing to deliver
appropriate levels of care, maintain accessible
treatment hours and reflect cultural and geographic
diversity
Reopening closed fire districts to ensure efficient
emergency response
² Analysis of the District's Legal Authority and Obligation to Provide Fire Protection Services, September 29, 2017.
Attachment A
As income disparity grows in Contra Costa County, safety-net programs
reduce economic inequities. By adding public and nonprofit critical
wraparound services for county residents- including child and elder
abuse protection, behavioral health, alcohol or substance abuse
treatment programs, legal advocacy for low-income and undocumented
residents, and social service and workforce development for residents
re-entering society, we begin to level the playing field and navigate
pathways toward holistic wellness.
Needs Assessment: Safety Net Programs
Across Contra Costa County in 2017,
21.7%3 of county residents fell below
200 percent of the poverty level, with
the worst levels (46.6%) in San Pablo.
In the current pandemic, an April 2020
report from the Economic Roundtable
indicated that 40% of county workers
face a high risk of unemployment, with
84% deemed “not essential,” 62% unable
to work from home, and 40% who are
not salaried employees4.
Since 2016, Contra Costa County has
lacked a combined 178 county social
workers and eligibility workers who are
instrumental in assisting county residents
experiencing poverty and homelessness
access state and federally funded
programs to help meet their needs. To
comprehensively manage community
needs during this medical emergency,
and in times of prosperity, our food
banks must have sustainable inventories,
legal advocacy and community outreach
require adequate staffing and funding
to help residents obtain full government
benefits, prevent eviction, and link
residents with healthcare benefits,
interpersonal violence protection,
emergency housing, and job training
and re-entry programs as we’re able to
reopen our economies.
Residents Below 200% of Federal Poverty Level
50
40
30
20
10
0
21.7%
Contra Costa County
30.3%
Antioch
32.7%
Pittsburg
27.2%
Concord
6.5%
Danville
25.5%
Oakley
46.6%
San Pablo
County Needs for Safety Net Programs Include
97% of the funding for safety-net eligibility workers is provided by state and federal dollars already
paid by our county taxpayers. A small, but targeted investment by the county would fill these
vacancies to help our most vulnerable residents access services to meet their needs.
Bolster county funding for safety-net providers – e.g. alcohol and substance abuse treatment,
interpersonal violence prevention, and legal advocacy– struggling to operate in Contra Costa County
with rising day-to-day costs.
Increasing the availability and accessibility of county’s safety-net programs will prevent vulnerable
individuals from needing to rely on county fire and emergency services for lower level of care needs.
3 http://www.vitalsigns.mtc.ca.gov/poverty
4In Harms Way, Daniel Flaming and Patrick Burns, April 2020
03
2,860
2017
2,983
2018
4,134
2019
Domestic Violence Screening Calls
Attachment A
Needs Assessment: Housing
Needs Assessment: Early Childhood
California has a serious housing crisis and Contra Costa County is experiencing more than its share of the crisis.
The California Housing Partnership found that Contra Costa needs 32,000 affordable rental homes to meet
demand from very-low-income and extremely-low-income residents5. This low-income housing scarcity, and the
resulting dramatic rise in rents, is a leading cause of homelessness, with 2,295 people experiencing homelessness
– more than 70% of them unsheltered – in the 2019 point-in-time count – a 43% increase since 2017.
6
Solving our housing crisis is beyond the scope of the revenue to be generated by the proposed sales tax, but
these revenues could be used as County matching funds to leverage new State funding for affordable housing
production and preservation, and to alleviate homelessness.
Some of the proven programs to meet our housing needs that could be implemented or supplemented
with new revenue include:
Greater investment in homelessness prevention – cost-effective, one-time or short-term assistance
to keep people at risk of homelessness in their homes. This strategy is used effectively by Contra Costa’s
homelessness Continuum of Care and should be supplemented.
Develop of community land trusts or similar housing trusts for pre-development investment in land
acquisition.
Funding for rent subsidies, such as existing Rapid Rehousing programs, to stem the tide of displacement
and help meet the housing needs of low-income residents.
In a very real sense, housing is healthcare. Unsheltered homeless people make an average of five emergency-room
visits each year and providing them with housing has been shown to significantly reduce emergency-room visits
and their overall healthcare costs. Numerous studies have shown that housing can be provided at less cost than
the additional use of emergency-room and related healthcare and additional law-enforcement interactions that
come from living on the streets.
Children and Infants are one of Contra Costa County’s most vulnerable populations.
Research shows that a child’s brain develops most dramatically during the first five
years of life, yet far too many children in Contra Costa County lack access to high-
quality early learning and care services and childhood comprehensive health needed.
Studies show that every dollar invested in early education saves seventeen dollars in
reduced costs for remedial education, incarceration and social support.7 Child care
and the child care workforce are of paramount importance as a critical service for
economic recovery.
Childcare
17,900 children ages 0-5 years who are eligible for subsidized child care cannot access
it due to low supply. Child care shortages are caused in part by low wages of child care
workers, approximately half of whom are eligible for public assistance despite working.
Mental Health
7,000-10,000 children have unserved mental health needs according to reports by
Health Providers in the county.
04
5 Contra Costa County’s Housing Emergency Update, May 2019, Danielle M. Mazella and Lindsay Rosenfeld, California Housing Partnership
6 2019 Point in Time factsheet, Contra Costa Health Services
7 https://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/new-research-early-education-as-economic-investme.aspx
Attachment A
05
•ACCE
•Budget Justice Coalition
•California Nurses
Association
•Contra Costa Labor
Council, AFL-CIO
•Community Clinic
Consortium
•East Bay Leadership
Council
•Ensuring Opportunity
•Firedoll Foundation
•First 5 Contra Costa/
Family Economic
Security Partnership
•Healthy & Active Before 5
•Hospital Council
•Human Services Alliance
•IFTPE Local 21, AFL-CIO
Mariana Moore, Senior Director
Ensuring Opportunity Campaign to End Poverty in Contra Costa
mmoore@richmondcf.org
510-234-1200 ext. 311
Early Learning
Only 44% of children in Contra Costa County met
the definition of “fully ready” for kindergarten; 35%
were partially ready; and 22% were not ready to
start school. Antioch, Pittsburg and west Contra
Costa have the highest concentrations of poverty
and the lowest rates of children “fully ready.”
With the widespread closure of child care services,
during the current Shelter-in-Place order, child
care services are utilizing home visiting and
parent education programs to improve child
outcomes and prevent child abuse during these
unprecedented times.
Sales Tax Working Group
Co-chaired by Mariana Moore and Joshua Anijar,
the Sales Tax Measure Ad Hoc Committee Working
Group represents public health, nonprofit and labor
stakeholders across Contra Costa which met during
regular public meetings between Dec ‘19 - May ‘20.
The needs for this community include:
Improve ECE workforce pay to improve early
learning program quality
Expand parenting support and early
childhood development services
Expand a coordinated early ID and
intervention system to improve service
delivery for children up to age 5
THE DEVASTATING IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON
CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE8
63%
of programs
would not survive
a closure of one
more or longer.
23%
of open programs
would not survive
a closure of any
length of time.
14%
of already-closed
programs report that their
program will not survive
the closure past May 30.
Joshua Anijar, Executive Director
Contra Costa Labor Council, AFL-CIO
josh@cclabor.net
602-770-9307
Sales Tax Working Group Co-Chairs
These entities met and developed the needs in this report. As the
specific language for a potential sales tax measure has not yet
been introduced, they may not be in a position organizationally to
endorse solutions at this time.
•Lift Up Contra Costa
•Lisa Driscoll, County
Finance Director
•Multi-Faith Action
Coalition
•Public Defenders
Association
•SEIU 1021
•Supervisor John Gioia’s
Office
•Supervisor Karen
Mitchoff’s Office
•Teamsters IBT 856
•United Professional
Firefighters of Contra
Costa County
•United Way Bay Area
Needs Assessment: Proposed Solutions
Based on needs assessment discussions and county voter polling, levying a 1/2 cent sales tax in Contra Costa
County can create a new revenue source that directly addresses accessibility to and availability of health
resources including the County Hospital and community-based health resources, expands county emergency
services, adds capacity for eligibility workers - with minimal financial investment from the county - to link our most
vulnerable residents with the resources they need to stabilize and improve their lives, establishes leveraging
opportunities to improve housing security, prevents interpersonal violence against residents of all ages, and
ensures that the children of Contra Costa County have access to necessary health resources and enriching
learning opportunities which are both accessible and affordable.
8California Child Care at the Brink - May 2020: https://cscce.berkeley.edu/files/2020/05/CSCCE_California-COVID-Data-Snapshot.pdf
Attachment A
Measure X Community Advisory Board Polling Results
Meeting of 9/8/2021
Sorted by High Priority, Secondary Priority, Not Sure, No Not This Year
Line Rank PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM High
Priority
Secondary
Priority
11Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community‐based mental health crisis response 24 1
22Early Childhood Svcs Childhood mental health services 22 2
33Fire & Emergency Svcs East County Fire Services 20 5
44Immigration & Racial Equity Office of Racial Equity & Social Justice 20 4
55Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community‐based mental health (various populations)19 5
65Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Contra Costa CARES 19 5
75Early Childhood Svcs Services for children with disabilities 19 5
86Housing & Homelessness Local housing trust fund (joint dept. request)19 2
97Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Accessible Transportation Strategic (ATS) plan 18 3
10 8
Housing & Homelessness Tenant legal services/supports ‐ county & community‐based 17 7
11 9
Early Childhood Svcs Childcare slots 17 6
12 9
Fire & Emergency Svcs Reopen Closed Stations 17 6
13 10
Youth & Young Adults Community‐based youth centers & services 17 5
14 11
Substance Abuse Treatment Community‐based substance use treatment 17 3
15 12
Immigration & Racial Equity Community‐based equity center ‐ East County 17 2
16 12
Justice Systems Front End Advocacy Teams ‐ FAST (Public Defender)17 2
17 13
Veterans & Seniors Community‐based aging services 16 7
18 14
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community‐based mental health for AAPI 16 5
19 14
Immigration & Racial Equity Public defenders/social workers for immigrants 16 5
20 15
Safety Net Guaranteed basic income pilot 16 1
21 16
Fire & Emergency Svcs Wildfire mitigation/fuel reduction 15 7
22 17
Library, Arts, Agriculture Community and school‐based arts programs 15 6
23 18
Youth & Young Adults Permanent housing subsidies and child care 15 4
24 19 Housing & Homelessness Community land trust 15 2
25 20
Immigration & Racial Equity Stand Together Contra Costa (social/legal services) 14 9
26 21
Justice Systems Community‐based reentry employment 14 8
27 21
Justice Systems Community‐based reentry support services 14 8
28 22
Library, Arts, Agriculture Arts & Culture Commission programs 14 7
29 22
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community‐based mental health for LGBTQ+14 7
30 22
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled East County Multi‐Agency center for disabled 14 7
31 22
Veterans & Seniors Master Plan on Aging 14 7
32 23
Safety Net Community‐based food distribution 14 6
33 24
Justice Systems Community‐based restorative justice 14 3
34 25
Justice Systems Abuse prevention/support 13 8
35 25
Immigration & Racial Equity Immigration legal services 13 8
36 26
Safety Net Community‐based training/employment 13 7
37 26
Early Childhood Svcs County family support services 13 7
38 26
Youth & Young Adults Discretionary funds for CPS & foster youth 13 7
39 26
Innovations Fund**Innovation Fund 13 7
40 26
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Medical response to mental health (SRV Fire Model)13 7
41 27
Immigration & Racial Equity Community‐based asylum support ‐ LGBTQ+13 6
42 27
Immigration & Racial Equity Rental assistance for immigrants 13 6
43 28
Justice Systems Reimagine public safety initiative ‐ Countywide 13 5
44 28
Fire & Emergency Svcs Seasonal staffing 13 5
45 29
Immigration & Racial Equity Multicultural wellness center (Nepali/AAPI) 13 4
46 30
Early Childhood Svcs Early care & education supports 12 9
47 30
Fire & Emergency Svcs Emergency Preparedness 12 9
48 30
Substance Abuse Treatment Sobering center 12 9
49 31
Housing & Homelessness County to prioritize people with developmental disabilities for housing services 12 7
50 31 Veterans & Seniors Discretionary Funds (Support Seniors & Vets)12 7
51 31
Justice Systems Sober living housing (Probation) 12 7
52 31
Fire & Emergency Svcs Veg Management 12 7
53 32
Housing & Homelessness Establish Housing for People with Developmental Disabilities 12 6
54 33
Veterans & Seniors County Case Management ‐ Seniors 11 11
55 34
Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Hospital Services 11 10
56 34
Justice Systems Reentry success center 11 10
57 35 Safety Net Civil/legal and flexible financial assistance for interpersonal violence victims 11 9
58 35
Fire & Emergency Svcs Richmond staffing 11 9
59 36
Veterans & Seniors Outreach to Seniors 11 7
60 37
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community‐based leadership program for deaf residents 11 6
61 38
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Addressing Climate Change 11 5
Priority Results by Program 1 of 2
Attachment B
Measure X Community Advisory Board Polling Results
Meeting of 9/8/2021
Sorted by High Priority, Secondary Priority, Not Sure, No Not This Year
Line Rank PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM High
Priority
Secondary
Priority
62 39
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community‐based mental health arts programs 10 8
63 39
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Contra Costa Arts & Culture Commission 10 8
64 40
Youth & Young Adults 24/7 respite care 10 7
65 41
Fire & Emergency Svcs Helicopter 10 4
66 41
Fire & Emergency Svcs Regional Paramedic 10 4
67 42
Veterans & Seniors Nurse behavioral health clinicians 911
68 43
Early Childhood Svcs Family partners/resource navigators 910
69 44
Fire & Emergency Svcs Emergency Communications 99
70 45
Early Childhood Svcs Service provider network supports 98
71 46
Safety Net CalFresh navigators 97
72 46
Safety Net Child support navigators 97
73 46
Justice Systems Drug treatment services (Probation) 97
74 46
Library, Arts, Agriculture Grants for local artists 97
75 47
Justice Systems Young Adult diversion (DA)9 4
76 48
Youth & Young Adults Whole Family Living Resources/Case Management 810
77 49
Justice Systems Combatting human trafficking (DA) 89
78 49
Substance Abuse Treatment Recovery housing 89
79 50
Justice Systems Resident with complex BH needs (Probation)8 7
80 51
Justice Systems Reimagine public safety initiative ‐ Richmond 8 6
81 52
Veterans & Seniors County Case Management ‐ Veterans 711
82 52
Safety Net Mobile food pharmacy 711
83 53
Veterans & Seniors Outreach to Veterans 78
84 54
Fire & Emergency Svcs Training Staff in South County 75
85 55
Library, Arts, Agriculture Expand county library hours 613
86 56
Safety Net County and Community‐based training and development 610
87 56
Justice Systems Office of Reentry & Justice (Probation) 610
88 57
Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Ambulatory services 69
89 58
Youth & Young Adults Family visitation center 6 7
90 59
Justice Systems Mentorship support (Probation) 66
91 60
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Food protections in West County 65
92 61
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Employer Incentives 62
93 62
Justice Systems Family Reunification (Probation) 58
94 63
Justice Systems Body/car cameras ‐ one‐time (Sheriff) 57
95 63
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works County Office of Climate Sustainability 57
96 63
Substance Abuse Treatment SUD counselor education grants 57
97 64
Fire & Emergency Svcs Regional inspector 56
98 65
Fire & Emergency Svcs Seismic/EOS 55
99 66
Substance Abuse Treatment SUD psychiatrists 413
100 67
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Green infrastructure 47
101 68
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Illegal dumping initiative 45
102 68
Early Childhood Svcs Integrated systems ‐ Children's Leadership Council 45
103 69
Library, Arts, Agriculture Additional inspectors ‐ Agriculture Department 4 3
104 70
Justice Systems Mental Health eval teams (Sheriff)4 2
105 71
Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Infrastructure 38
106 72
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Watershed protection 37
107 73
Justice Systems Circles (Probation) 34
108 74
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Northern Waterfront Initiative 3 3
109 75
Library, Arts, Agriculture Rehab six libraries 28
110 76
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Storm Drains 24
111 76
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Street sweeping 24
112 77 Justice Systems GPS Dispatching system (Sheriff) 23
113 77
Justice Systems Independent investigations bureau (DA) 23
114 77
Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Public Health Lab 2 3
115 78
Justice Systems Neighborhood Patrols (Sheriff) 22
116 79
Justice Systems Body/car cameras ‐ annual (Sheriff) 15
117 80
Justice Systems Quality of life crime detectives (Sheriff)0 3
Priority Results by Program 2 of 2
Attachment B
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM
Yes - Top
Priority
Yes -
Secondary
Priority Not Sure
No - Not
this year Check
County Case Management - Seniors 8 7 2 2 19
County Case Management - Veterans 6 6 2 5 19
Discretionary Funds (Support Seniors & Vets)9 5 5 0 19
Nurse behavioral health clinicians 9 7 1 2 19
Master Plan on Aging 11 5 3 0 19
Outreach to Veterans 6 6 3 4 19
Outreach to Seniors 7 6 3 3 19
Community-based aging svcs 12 6 1 0 19
Reopen Closed Stations 16 3 0 0 19
Richmond staffing 7 6 3 3 19
Veg Management 9 8 1 1 19
Wildfire mitigation/fuel reduction 16 3 19
Seasonal staffing 12 5 2 19
Emergency Communications 7 8 4 19
Emergency Preparedness 11 6 1 1 19
Seismic/EOS 5 4 5 5 19
Regional inspector 4 4 6 5 19
Training Staff in South County 4 4 6 5 19
Regional Paramedic 10 2 4 3 19
Helicopter 8 3 0 8 19
East County Fire svcs 18 1 19
County family support svcs 9 8 1 1 19
Childcare slots 12 4 1 2 19
Childhood mental health svcs 15 4 19
svcs for children with disabilities 14 5 19
Service provider network supports 8 5 3 3 19
Family partners/resource navigators 7 4 6 2 19
Early care & education supports 9 5 4 1 19
Integrated systems - Children's Leadership Council 1 9 4 5 19
Discretionary funds for CPS & foster youth 12 4 3 19
Whole Family Living Resources/Case Management 7 7 4 1 19
Family visitation center 4 3 7 5 19
24/7 respite care 10 4 5 19
Permanent housing subsidies and child care 11 6 0 2 19
Community-based youth centers & svcs 14 4 0 1 19
Public Health Lab 5 3 2 9 19
Ambulatory svcs 8 8 3 0 19
Hospital svcs 11 6 0 2 19
Infrastructure 3 5 6 5 19
Contra Costa CARES 14 2 2 1 19
Community-based mental health crisis response 18 1 0 0 19
Medical response to mental health (SRV Fire Model)10 2 5 2 19
Contra Costa Arts & Culture Commission 6 6 4 3 19
East County Multi-Agency center for disabled 12 3 3 1 19
Community-based mental health arts programs 9 5 3 2 19
Community-based leadership program for deaf residents 6 9 2 2 19
Community-based mental health (various populations)15 3 1 0 19
Community-based mental health for LGBTQ+8 8 1 2 19
Community-based mental health for AAPI 11 3 3 2 19
Employer Incentives 6 4 4 5 19
Community-based substance use treatment 9 4 5 1 19
Sobering center 10 4 5 19
Recovery housing 10 3 5 1 19
SUD psychiatrists 5 8 4 2 19
SUD counselor education grants 7 5 5 2 19
Local housing trust fund (joint dept. request)11 2 4 2 19
Tenant legal svcs/supports - county & community-based 14 4 1 19
Community land trust 12 2 3 2 19
Establish Housing for People with Developmental Disabilities 12 4 3 0 19
CCC to prioritize people w/ developmental disabilities for housing svcs 11 5 3 19
Housing & Homelessness
Substance Abuse
Treatment
Mental/Behavioral
Health, Disabled
Health Svcs & Regional
Hospital
Youth & Young Adults
Early Childhood Svcs
Veterans & Seniors
Fire & Emergency Svcs
All Data 1
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM
Yes - Top
Priority
Yes -
Secondary
Priority Not Sure
No - Not
this year Check
Young Adult diversion (DA)4 7 1 7 19
Combatting human trafficking (DA) 3 7 6 3 19
Independent investigations bureau (DA) 1 2 6 10 19
Office of Reentry & Justice (Probation) 6 5 2 6 19
Resident with complex BH needs (Probation)8 6 2 3 19
Drug treatment svcs (Probation) 6 7 3 3 19
Sober living housing (Probation) 9 4 2 4 19
Mentorship support (Probation) 5 4 2 8 19
Circles (Probation) 2 4 9 4 19
Family Reunification (Probation) 5 7 3 4 19
Front End Advocacy Teams - FAST (Public Defender)11 4 2 2 19
Neighborhood Patrols (Sheriff) 0 2 3 14 19
Mental Health eval teams (Sheriff)3 3 2 11 19
Quality of life crime detectives (Sheriff)0 2 4 13 19
GPS Dispatching system (Sheriff) 0 1 6 12 19
Body/car cameras - one-time (Sheriff) 3 5 3 8 19
Body/car cameras - annual (Sheriff) 3 3 4 9 19
Community-based reentry employment 8 7 2 2 19
Reentry success center 7 6 3 3 19
Community-based reentry support svcs 10 5 2 2 19
Reimagine public safety initiative - Countywide 12 2 2 3 19
Reimagine public safety initiative - Richmond 5 3 4 7 19
Community-based restorative justice 13 2 1 3 19
Abuse prevention/support 8 6 5 0 19
CalFresh navigators 8 5 3 3 19
Mobile food pharmacy 9 4 5 1 19
Child support navigators 4 5 4 6 19
Guaranteed basic income pilot 13 1 1 4 19
Community-based training/employment 9 3 6 1 19
Community-based food distribution 12 2 3 2 19
County and Community-based training and development 6 8 4 1 19
Civil/legal and flexible financial asst. for interpersonal violence victims 8 9 0 2 19
Office of Racial Equity & Social Justice 13 6 0 0 19
Community-based equity center - East County 14 1 3 1 19
Stand Together Contra Costa (social/legal svcs) 10 7 2 0 19
Community-based asylum support - LGBTQ+8 6 2 3 19
Immigration legal svcs 12 6 0 1 19
Rental assistance for immigrants 12 3 1 3 19
Public defenders/social workers for immigrants 12 5 1 1 19
Multicultural wellness center (Nepali/AAPI) 8 6 2 3 19
Expand county library hours 11 2 2 4 19
Rehab six libraries 4 3 2 10 19
Arts & Culture Commission programs 6 8 2 3 19
Grants for local artists 7 4 6 2 19
Community and school-based arts programs 7 9 2 1 19
Additional inspectors - Agriculture Department 4 2 5 8 19
Food protections in West County 4 3 8 4 19
Storm Drains 2 4 2 11 19
Watershed protection 4 7 1 7 19
Street sweeping 0 4 2 13 19
Green infrastructure 3 5 5 6 19
Accessible Transportation Strategic (ATS) plan 15 3 0 1 19
County Office of Climate Sustainability 7 6 3 3 19
Northern Waterfront Initiative 2 2 6 9 19
Illegal dumping initiative 1 7 4 7 19
Addressing Climate Change 10 5 2 2 19
Innovations Fund Innovations Fund 11 3 2 1 17
Environment,
Transportation, CDC,
Public Works
Library, Arts, Agriculture
Immigration & Racial
Equity
Safety Net
Justice Systems
All Data 2
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM
High
Priority
High
Priority %
Secondary
Priority
Secondary
Priority %
Not a
Priority*
Not a
Priority %
Community-based aging services 12 63%6 32%1 5%
Master Plan on Aging 11 58%5 26%3 16%
Nurse behavioral health clinicians 9 47%7 37%3 16%
Discretionary Funds (Support Seniors & Vets)9 47%5 26%5 26%
County Case Management - Seniors 8 42%7 37%4 21%
Outreach to Seniors 7 37%6 32%6 32%
County Case Management - Veterans 6 32%6 32%7 37%
Outreach to Veterans 6 32%6 32%7 37%
East County Fire Services 18 95%1 5%0 0%
Reopen Closed Stations 16 84%3 16%0 0%
Wildfire mitigation/fuel reduction 16 84%3 16%0 0%
Seasonal staffing 12 63%5 26%2 11%
Emergency Preparedness 11 58%6 32%2 11%
Regional Paramedic 10 53%2 11%7 37%
Veg Management 9 47%8 42%2 11%
Helicopter 8 42%3 16%8 42%
Emergency Communications 7 37%8 42%4 21%
Richmond staffing 7 37%6 32%6 32%
Seismic/EOS 5 26%4 21%10 53%
Regional inspector 4 21%4 21%11 58%
Training Staff in South County 4 21%4 21%11 58%
Childhood mental health services 15 79%4 21%0 0%
Services for children with disabilities 14 74%5 26%0 0%
Childcare slots 12 63%4 21%3 16%
County family support services 9 47%8 42%2 11%
Early care & education supports 9 47%5 26%5 26%
Service provider network supports 8 42%5 26%6 32%
Family partners/resource navigators 7 37%4 21%8 42%
Integrated systems - Children's Leadership Council 1 5%9 47%9 47%
Community-based youth centers & services 14 74%4 21%1 5%
Discretionary funds for CPS & foster youth 12 63%4 21%3 16%
Permanent housing subsidies and child care 11 58%6 32%2 11%
24/7 respite care 10 53%4 21%5 26%
Whole Family Living Resources/Case Management 7 37%7 37%5 26%
Family visitation center 4 21%3 16%12 63%
Contra Costa CARES 14 74%2 11%3 16%
Hospital Services 11 58%6 32%2 11%
Ambulatory services 8 42%8 42%3 16%
Public Health Lab 5 26%3 16%11 58%
Infrastructure 3 16%5 26%11 58%
Community-based mental health crisis response 18 95%1 5%0 0%
Medical response to mental health (SRV Fire Model)15 79%3 16%1 5%
Contra Costa Arts & Culture Commission 12 63%3 16%4 21%
East County Multi-Agency center for disabled 11 58%3 16%5 26%
Community-based mental health arts programs 10 53%2 11%7 37%
Community-based leadership program for deaf residents 9 47%5 26%5 26%
Community-based mental health (various populations)8 42%8 42%3 16%
Community-based mental health for LGBTQ+6 32%9 47%4 21%
Community-based mental health for AAPI 6 32%6 32%7 37%
Employer Incentives 6 32%4 21%9 47%
Sobering center 10 53%4 21%5 26%
Recovery housing 10 53%3 16%6 32%
Community-based substance use treatment 9 47%4 21%6 32%
SUD counselor education grants 7 37%5 26%7 37%
SUD psychiatrists 5 26%8 42%6 32%
Tenant legal services/supports - county & community-based 14 74%4 21%1 5%
Establish Housing for People with Developmental Disabilities 12 63%4 21%3 16%
Community land trust 12 63%2 11%5 26%
CCC to prioritize people w developmental disabilities for housing services 11 58%5 26%3 16%
Local housing trust fund (joint dept. request)11 58%2 11%6 32%
Guaranteed basic income pilot 13 68%1 5%5 26%
Community-based food distribution 12 63%2 11%5 26%
Mobile food pharmacy 9 47%4 21%6 32%
Community-based training/employment 9 47%3 16%7 37%
Civil/legal and flexible financial asst for interpersonal violence victims 8 42%9 47%2 11%
CalFresh navigators 8 42%5 26%6 32%
County and Community-based training and development 6 32%8 42%5 26%
Child support navigators 4 21%5 26%10 53%
Sorted by High Priority, Secondary Priority
Mental/Behavioral
Health, Disabled
Substance Abuse
Treatment
Housing &
Homelessness
Safety Net
Veterans & Seniors
Fire & Emergency
Svcs
Early Childhood Svcs
Youth & Young
Adults
Health Svcs &
Regional Hospital
Priority Results by Category 3
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM
High
Priority
High
Priority %
Secondary
Priority
Secondary
Priority %
Not a
Priority*
Not a
Priority %
Community-based restorative justice 13 68%2 11%4 21%
Reimagine public safety initiative - Countywide 12 63%2 11%5 26%
Front End Advocacy Teams - FAST (Public Defender)11 58%4 21%4 21%
Community-based reentry support services 10 53%5 26%4 21%
Sober living housing (Probation) 9 47%4 21%6 32%
Community-based reentry employment 8 42%7 37%4 21%
Resident with complex BH needs (Probation)8 42%6 32%5 26%
Abuse prevention/support 8 42%6 32%5 26%
Reentry success center 7 37%6 32%6 32%
Drug treatment services (Probation) 6 32%7 37%6 32%
Office of Reentry & Justice (Probation) 6 32%5 26%8 42%
Family Reunification (Probation) 5 26%7 37%7 37%
Mentorship support (Probation) 5 26%4 21%10 53%
Reimagine public safety initiative - Richmond 5 26%3 16%11 58%
Young Adult diversion (DA)4 21%7 37%8 42%
Combatting human trafficking (DA) 3 16%7 37%9 47%
Body/car cameras - one-time (Sheriff) 3 16%5 26%11 58%
Mental Health eval teams (Sheriff)3 16%3 16%13 68%
Body/car cameras - annual (Sheriff) 3 16%3 16%13 68%
Circles (Probation) 2 11%4 21%13 68%
Independent investigations bureau (DA) 1 5%2 11%16 84%
Neighborhood Patrols (Sheriff) 0 0%2 11%17 89%
Quality of life crime detectives (Sheriff)0 0%2 11%17 89%
GPS Dispatching system (Sheriff) 0 0%1 5%18 95%
Community-based equity center - East County 14 74%1 5%4 21%
Office of Racial Equity & Social Justice 13 68%6 32%0 0%
Immigration legal services 12 63%6 32%1 5%
Public defenders/social workers for immigrants 12 63%5 26%2 11%
Rental assistance for immigrants 12 63%3 16%4 21%
Stand Together Contra Costa (social/legal services) 10 53%7 37%2 11%
Community-based asylum support - LGBTQ+8 42%6 32%5 26%
Multicultural wellness center (Nepali/AAPI) 8 42%6 32%5 26%
Expand county library hours 11 58%2 11%6 32%
Community and school-based arts programs 7 37%9 47%3 16%
Grants for local artists 7 37%4 21%8 42%
Arts & Culture Commission programs 6 32%8 42%5 26%
Rehab six libraries 4 21%3 16%12 63%
Additional inspectors - Agriculture Department 4 21%2 11%13 68%
Accessible Transportation Strategic (ATS) plan 15 79%3 16%1 5%
Addressing Climate Change 10 53%5 26%4 21%
County Office of Climate Sustainability 7 37%6 32%6 32%
Watershed protection 4 21%7 37%8 42%
Food protections in West County 4 21%3 16%12 63%
Green infrastructure 3 16%5 26%11 58%
Storm Drains 2 11%4 21%13 68%
Northern Waterfront Initiative 2 11%2 11%15 79%
Illegal dumping initiative 1 5%7 37%11 58%
Street sweeping 0 0%4 21%15 79%
Innovations Fund**
Innovations Fund 11 65%3 18%3 18%
*Not a priority is the sum of "Not Sure" and "No - Not This Year" responses.
** Innovations Fund question only had 17 responses at the time of this data compilation
Library, Arts,
Agriculture
Environment,
Transportation,
CDC, Public Works
Justice Systems
Immigration &
Racial Equity
Priority Results by Category 4
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM
High
Priority
Secondary
Priority Not Sure
1 Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community-based mental health crisis response 18 1 0
2 Fire & Emergency Svcs East County Fire Services 18 1 0
3 Fire & Emergency Svcs Reopen Closed Stations 16 3 0
4 Fire & Emergency Svcs Wildfire mitigation/fuel reduction 16 3 0
5 Early Childhood Svcs Childhood mental health services 15 4 0
6 Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community-based mental health (various populations)15 3 1
7 Public Works Accessible Transportation Strategic (ATS) plan 15 3 0
8 Early Childhood Svcs Services for children with disabilities 14 5 0
9 Housing & Homelessness Tenant legal services/supports - county & community-based 14 4 1
10 Youth & Young Adults Community-based youth centers & services 14 4 0
11 Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Contra Costa CARES 14 2 2
12 Immigration & Racial Equity Community-based equity center - East County 14 1 3
13 Immigration & Racial Equity Office of Racial Equity & Social Justice 13 6 0
14 Justice Systems Community-based restorative justice 13 2 1
15 Safety Net Guaranteed basic income pilot 13 1 1
16 Veterans & Seniors Community-based aging services 12 6 1
17 Immigration & Racial Equity Immigration legal services 12 6 0
18 Fire & Emergency Svcs Seasonal staffing 12 5 2
19 Immigration & Racial Equity Public defenders/social workers for immigrants 12 5 1
20 Housing & Homelessness Establish Housing for People with Developmental Disabilities 12 4 3
21 Youth & Young Adults Discretionary funds for CPS & foster youth 12 4 3
22 Early Childhood Svcs Childcare slots 12 4 1
23 Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled East County Multi-Agency center for disabled 12 3 3
24 Immigration & Racial Equity Rental assistance for immigrants 12 3 1
25 Housing & Homelessness Community land trust 12 2 3
26 Safety Net Community-based food distribution 12 2 3
27 Justice Systems Reimagine public safety initiative - Countywide 12 2 2
28 Fire & Emergency Svcs Emergency Preparedness 11 6 1
29 Youth & Young Adults Permanent housing subsidies and child care 11 6 0
30 Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Hospital Services 11 6 0
31 Veterans & Seniors Master Plan on Aging 11 5 3
32 Housing & Homelessness County to prioritize people with developmental disabilities for housing serv 11 5 3
33 Justice Systems Front End Advocacy Teams - FAST (Public Defender)11 4 2
34 Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community-based mental health for AAPI 11 3 3
35 Innovations Fund**Innovations Fund 11 3 2
36 Housing & Homelessness Local housing trust fund (joint dept. request)11 2 4
37 Library, Arts, Agriculture Expand county library hours 11 2 2
38 Immigration & Racial Equity Stand Together Contra Costa (social/legal services) 10 7 2
39 Justice Systems Community-based reentry support services 10 5 2
40 Public Works Addressing Climate Change 10 5 2
41 Youth & Young Adults 24/7 respite care 10 4 5
42 Substance Abuse Treatment Sobering center 10 4 5
43 Substance Abuse Treatment Recovery housing 10 3 5
44 Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Medical response to mental health (SRV Fire Model)10 2 5
45 Fire & Emergency Svcs Regional Paramedic 10 2 4
46 Fire & Emergency Svcs Veg Management 9 8 1
47 Early Childhood Svcs County family support services 9 8 1
48 Veterans & Seniors Nurse behavioral health clinicians 9 7 1
49 Veterans & Seniors Discretionary Funds (Support Seniors & Vets)9 5 5
50 Early Childhood Svcs Early care & education supports 9 5 4
51 Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community-based mental health arts programs 9 5 3
52 Substance Abuse Treatment Community-based substance use treatment 9 4 5
Sorted by High Priority, Secondary Priority, Not Sure
Priority Results by Program 5
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM
High
Priority
Secondary
Priority Not Sure
53 Safety Net Mobile food pharmacy 9 4 5
54 Justice Systems Sober living housing (Probation) 9 4 2
55 Safety Net Community-based training/employment 9 3 6
56 Safety Net Civil/legal and flexible financial assistance for interpersonal violence victim 8 9 0
57 Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Ambulatory services 8 8 3
58 Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community-based mental health for LGBTQ+8 8 1
59 Veterans & Seniors County Case Management - Seniors 8 7 2
60 Justice Systems Community-based reentry employment 8 7 2
61 Justice Systems Abuse prevention/support 8 6 5
62 Justice Systems Resident with complex BH needs (Probation)8 6 2
63 Immigration & Racial Equity Community-based asylum support - LGBTQ+8 6 2
64 Immigration & Racial Equity Multicultural wellness center (Nepali/AAPI) 8 6 2
65 Early Childhood Svcs Service provider network supports 8 5 3
66 Safety Net CalFresh navigators 8 5 3
67 Fire & Emergency Svcs Helicopter 8 3 0
68 Library, Arts, Agriculture Community and school-based arts programs 7 9 2
69 Fire & Emergency Svcs Emergency Communications 7 8 4
70 Youth & Young Adults Whole Family Living Resources/Case Management 7 7 4
71 Veterans & Seniors Outreach to Seniors 7 6 3
72 Fire & Emergency Svcs Richmond staffing 7 6 3
73 Justice Systems Reentry success center 7 6 3
74
Environment, Transportation, CDC,
Public Works County Office of Climate Sustainability 7 6 3
75 Substance Abuse Treatment SUD counselor education grants 7 5 5
76 Early Childhood Svcs Family partners/resource navigators 7 4 6
77 Library, Arts, Agriculture Grants for local artists 7 4 6
78 Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community-based leadership program for deaf residents 6 9 2
79 Safety Net County and Community-based training and development 6 8 4
80 Library, Arts, Agriculture Arts & Culture Commission programs 6 8 2
81 Justice Systems Drug treatment services (Probation) 6 7 3
82 Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Contra Costa Arts & Culture Commission 6 6 4
83 Veterans & Seniors Outreach to Veterans 6 6 3
84 Veterans & Seniors County Case Management - Veterans 6 6 2
85 Justice Systems Office of Reentry & Justice (Probation) 6 5 2
86 Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Employer Incentives 6 4 4
87 Substance Abuse Treatment SUD psychiatrists 5 8 4
88 Justice Systems Family Reunification (Probation) 5 7 3
89 Fire & Emergency Svcs Seismic/EOS 5 4 5
90 Justice Systems Mentorship support (Probation) 5 4 2
91 Justice Systems Reimagine public safety initiative - Richmond 5 3 4
92 Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Public Health Lab 5 3 2
93 Justice Systems Young Adult diversion (DA)4 7 1
94
Environment, Transportation, CDC,
Public Works Watershed protection 4 7 1
95 Safety Net Child support navigators 4 5 4
96 Fire & Emergency Svcs Regional inspector 4 4 6
97 Fire & Emergency Svcs Training Staff in South County 4 4 6
98
Environment, Transportation, CDC,
Public Works Food protections in West County 4 3 8
99 Youth & Young Adults Family visitation center 4 3 7
Priority Results by Program 6
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM
High
Priority
Secondary
Priority Not Sure
100 Library, Arts, Agriculture Rehab six libraries 4 3 2
101 Library, Arts, Agriculture Additional inspectors - Agriculture Department 4 2 5
102 Justice Systems Combatting human trafficking (DA) 3 7 6
103 Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Infrastructure 3 5 6
104
Environment, Transportation, CDC,
Public Works Green infrastructure 3 5 5
105 Justice Systems Body/car cameras - one-time (Sheriff) 3 5 3
106 Justice Systems Body/car cameras - annual (Sheriff) 3 3 4
107 Justice Systems Mental Health eval teams (Sheriff)3 3 2
108 Justice Systems Circles (Probation) 2 4 9
109
Environment, Transportation, CDC,
Public Works Storm Drains 2 4 2
110
Environment, Transportation, CDC,
Public Works Northern Waterfront Initiative 2 2 6
111 Early Childhood Svcs Integrated systems - Children's Leadership Council 1 9 4
112
Environment, Transportation, CDC,
Public Works Illegal dumping initiative 1 7 4
113 Justice Systems Independent investigations bureau (DA) 1 2 6
114
Environment, Transportation, CDC,
Public Works Street sweeping 0 4 2
115 Justice Systems Quality of life crime detectives (Sheriff)0 2 4
116 Justice Systems Neighborhood Patrols (Sheriff) 0 2 3
117 Justice Systems GPS Dispatching system (Sheriff) 0 1 6
*Not a priority is the sum of "Not Sure" and "No - Not This Year" responses.
** Innovations Fund question only had 17 responses at the time of this data compilation
Priority Results by Program 7
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM
No - Not
this year Not Sure
Justice Systems Neighborhood Patrols (Sheriff) 14 3
Justice Systems Quality of life crime detectives (Sheriff)13 4
Environment, Transportation,
CDC, Public Works Street sweeping 13 2
Justice Systems GPS Dispatching system (Sheriff) 12 6
Justice Systems Mental Health eval teams (Sheriff)11 2
Environment, Transportation,
CDC, Public Works Storm Drains 11 2
Justice Systems Independent investigations bureau (DA) 10 6
Library, Arts, Agriculture Rehab six libraries 10 2
Environment, Transportation,
CDC, Public Works Northern Waterfront Initiative 9 6
Justice Systems Body/car cameras - annual (Sheriff) 9 4
Health Svcs & Regional
Hospital Public Health Lab 9 2
Library, Arts, Agriculture Additional inspectors - Agriculture Department 8 5
Justice Systems Body/car cameras - one-time (Sheriff) 8 3
Justice Systems Mentorship support (Probation) 8 2
Fire & Emergency Svcs Helicopter 8 0
Justice Systems Reimagine public safety initiative - Richmond 7 4
Environment, Transportation,
CDC, Public Works Illegal dumping initiative 7 4
Justice Systems Young Adult diversion (DA)7 1
Environment, Transportation,
CDC, Public Works Watershed protection 7 1
Environment, Transportation,
CDC, Public Works Green infrastructure 6 5
Safety Net Child support navigators 6 4
Justice Systems Office of Reentry & Justice (Probation) 6 2
Youth & Young Adults Family visitation center 5 7
Fire & Emergency Svcs Regional inspector 5 6
Fire & Emergency Svcs Training Staff in South County 5 6
Health Svcs & Regional
Hospital Infrastructure 5 6
Fire & Emergency Svcs Seismic/EOS 5 5
Early Childhood Svcs Integrated systems - Children's Leadership Council 5 4
Mental/Behavioral Health,
Disabled Employer Incentives 5 4
Veterans & Seniors County Case Management - Veterans 5 2
Justice Systems Circles (Probation) 4 9
Sorted by "No - Not this year", "Not Sure"
Sorted by "No - Not this year", "Not Sure"8
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM
No - Not
this year Not Sure
Environment, Transportation,
CDC, Public Works Food protections in West County 4 8
Veterans & Seniors Outreach to Veterans 4 3
Justice Systems Family Reunification (Probation) 4 3
Justice Systems Sober living housing (Probation) 4 2
Library, Arts, Agriculture Expand county library hours 4 2
Safety Net Guaranteed basic income pilot 4 1
Justice Systems Combatting human trafficking (DA) 3 6
Fire & Emergency Svcs Regional Paramedic 3 4
Mental/Behavioral Health,
Disabled Contra Costa Arts & Culture Commission 3 4
Veterans & Seniors Outreach to Seniors 3 3
Fire & Emergency Svcs Richmond staffing 3 3
Early Childhood Svcs Service provider network supports 3 3
Justice Systems Drug treatment services (Probation) 3 3
Justice Systems Reentry success center 3 3
Safety Net CalFresh navigators 3 3
Environment, Transportation,
CDC, Public Works County Office of Climate Sustainability 3 3
Justice Systems Resident with complex BH needs (Probation)3 2
Justice Systems Reimagine public safety initiative - Countywide 3 2
Immigration & Racial Equity Community-based asylum support - LGBTQ+3 2
Immigration & Racial Equity Multicultural wellness center (Nepali/AAPI) 3 2
Library, Arts, Agriculture Arts & Culture Commission programs 3 2
Justice Systems Community-based restorative justice 3 1
Immigration & Racial Equity Rental assistance for immigrants 3 1
Early Childhood Svcs Family partners/resource navigators 2 6
Library, Arts, Agriculture Grants for local artists 2 6
Mental/Behavioral Health,
Disabled Medical response to mental health (SRV Fire Model)2 5
Substance Abuse Treatment SUD counselor education grants 2 5
Substance Abuse Treatment SUD psychiatrists 2 4
Housing & Homelessness Local housing trust fund (joint dept. request)2 4
Mental/Behavioral Health,
Disabled Community-based mental health arts programs 2 3
Mental/Behavioral Health,
Disabled Community-based mental health for AAPI 2 3
Housing & Homelessness Community land trust 2 3
Safety Net Community-based food distribution 2 3
Veterans & Seniors County Case Management - Seniors 2 2
Mental/Behavioral Health,
Disabled Community-based leadership program for deaf residents 2 2
Justice Systems Front End Advocacy Teams - FAST (Public Defender)2 2
Justice Systems Community-based reentry employment 2 2
Justice Systems Community-based reentry support services 2 2
Sorted by "No - Not this year", "Not Sure"9
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM
No - Not
this year Not Sure
Environment, Transportation,
CDC, Public Works Addressing Climate Change 2 2
Veterans & Seniors Nurse behavioral health clinicians 2 1
Early Childhood Svcs Childcare slots 2 1
Mental/Behavioral Health,
Disabled Community-based mental health for LGBTQ+2 1
Youth & Young Adults Permanent housing subsidies and child care 2 0
Health Svcs & Regional
Hospital Hospital Services 2 0
Safety Net Civil/legal and flexible financial asst for interpersonal violence
victims 2 0
Safety Net Community-based training/employment 1 6
Substance Abuse Treatment Community-based substance use treatment 1 5
Substance Abuse Treatment Recovery housing 1 5
Safety Net Mobile food pharmacy 1 5
Early Childhood Svcs Early care & education supports 1 4
Youth & Young Adults Whole Family Living Resources/Case Management 1 4
Safety Net County and Community-based training and development 1 4
Mental/Behavioral Health,
Disabled East County Multi-Agency center for disabled 1 3
Immigration & Racial Equity Community-based equity center - East County 1 3
Health Svcs & Regional
Hospital Contra Costa CARES 1 2
Library, Arts, Agriculture Community and school-based arts programs 1 2
Innovations Fund Innovations Fund 1 2
Fire & Emergency Svcs Veg Management 1 1
Fire & Emergency Svcs Emergency Preparedness 1 1
Early Childhood Svcs County family support services 1 1
Immigration & Racial Equity Public defenders/social workers for immigrants 1 1
Youth & Young Adults Community-based youth centers & services 1 0
Immigration & Racial Equity Immigration legal services 1 0
Environment, Transportation,
CDC, Public Works Accessible Transportation Strategic (ATS) plan 1 0
Veterans & Seniors Discretionary Funds (Support Seniors & Vets)0 5
Justice Systems Abuse prevention/support 0 5
Veterans & Seniors Master Plan on Aging 0 3
Health Svcs & Regional
Hospital Ambulatory services 0 3
Housing & Homelessness Establish Housing for People with Developmental Disabilities 0 3
Immigration & Racial Equity Stand Together Contra Costa (social/legal services) 0 2
Veterans & Seniors Community-based aging services 0 1
Mental/Behavioral Health,
Disabled Community-based mental health (various populations)0 1
Fire & Emergency Svcs Reopen Closed Stations 0 0
Mental/Behavioral Health,
Disabled Community-based mental health crisis response 0 0
Sorted by "No - Not this year", "Not Sure"10
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM
No - Not
this year Not Sure
Immigration & Racial Equity Office of Racial Equity & Social Justice 0 0
Youth & Young Adults 24/7 respite care 0 5
Substance Abuse Treatment Sobering center 0 5
Fire & Emergency Svcs Emergency Communications 0 4
Youth & Young Adults Discretionary funds for CPS & foster youth 0 3
Housing & Homelessness CCC to prioritize people w developmental disabilities for housing
services 0 3
Fire & Emergency Svcs Seasonal staffing 0 2
Housing & Homelessness Tenant legal services/supports - county & community-based 0 1
Fire & Emergency Svcs Wildfire mitigation/fuel reduction 0 0
Fire & Emergency Svcs East County Fire Services 0 0
Early Childhood Svcs Childhood mental health services 0 0
Early Childhood Svcs Services for children with disabilities 0 0
Sorted by "No - Not this year", "Not Sure"11
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM Not Sure
Justice Systems Circles (Probation) 9
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Food protections in West County 8
Youth & Young Adults Family visitation center 7
Justice Systems GPS Dispatching system (Sheriff) 6
Justice Systems Independent investigations bureau (DA) 6
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Northern Waterfront Initiative 6
Fire & Emergency Svcs Regional inspector 6
Fire & Emergency Svcs Training Staff in South County 6
Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Infrastructure 6
Justice Systems Combatting human trafficking (DA) 6
Early Childhood Svcs Family partners/resource navigators 6
Library, Arts, Agriculture Grants for local artists 6
Safety Net Community-based training/employment 6
Library, Arts, Agriculture Additional inspectors - Agriculture Department 5
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Green infrastructure 5
Fire & Emergency Svcs Seismic/EOS 5
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Medical response to mental health (SRV Fire Model)5
Substance Abuse Treatment SUD counselor education grants 5
Substance Abuse Treatment Community-based substance use treatment 5
Substance Abuse Treatment Recovery housing 5
Safety Net Mobile food pharmacy 5
Veterans & Seniors Discretionary Funds (Support Seniors & Vets)5
Justice Systems Abuse prevention/support 5
Youth & Young Adults 24/7 respite care 5
Substance Abuse Treatment Sobering center 5
Justice Systems Quality of life crime detectives (Sheriff)4
Justice Systems Body/car cameras - annual (Sheriff) 4
Justice Systems Reimagine public safety initiative - Richmond 4
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Illegal dumping initiative 4
Safety Net Child support navigators 4
Early Childhood Svcs Integrated systems - Children's Leadership Council 4
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Employer Incentives 4
Fire & Emergency Svcs Regional Paramedic 4
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Contra Costa Arts & Culture Commission 4
Substance Abuse Treatment SUD psychiatrists 4
Housing & Homelessness Local housing trust fund (joint dept. request)4
Early Childhood Svcs Early care & education supports 4
Youth & Young Adults Whole Family Living Resources/Case Management 4
Safety Net County and Community-based training and development 4
Fire & Emergency Svcs Emergency Communications 4
Justice Systems Neighborhood Patrols (Sheriff) 3
Justice Systems Body/car cameras - one-time (Sheriff) 3
Veterans & Seniors Outreach to Veterans 3
Justice Systems Family Reunification (Probation) 3
Veterans & Seniors Outreach to Seniors 3
Fire & Emergency Svcs Richmond staffing 3
Early Childhood Svcs Service provider network supports 3
Justice Systems Drug treatment services (Probation) 3
Justice Systems Reentry success center 3
Sorted by "Not Sure"
Sorted by "Not Sure" 12
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM Not Sure
Safety Net CalFresh navigators 3
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works County Office of Climate Sustainability 3
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community-based mental health arts programs 3
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community-based mental health for AAPI 3
Housing & Homelessness Community land trust 3
Safety Net Community-based food distribution 3
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled East County Multi-Agency center for disabled 3
Immigration & Racial Equity Community-based equity center - East County 3
Veterans & Seniors Master Plan on Aging 3
Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Ambulatory services 3
Housing & Homelessness Establish Housing for People with Developmental Disabilities 3
Youth & Young Adults Discretionary funds for CPS & foster youth 3
Housing & Homelessness County to prioritize people with developmental disabilities for housing servic 3
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Street sweeping 2
Justice Systems Mental Health eval teams (Sheriff)2
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Storm Drains 2
Library, Arts, Agriculture Rehab six libraries 2
Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Public Health Lab 2
Justice Systems Mentorship support (Probation) 2
Justice Systems Office of Reentry & Justice (Probation) 2
Veterans & Seniors County Case Management - Veterans 2
Justice Systems Sober living housing (Probation) 2
Library, Arts, Agriculture Expand county library hours 2
Justice Systems Resident with complex BH needs (Probation)2
Justice Systems Reimagine public safety initiative - Countywide 2
Immigration & Racial Equity Community-based asylum support - LGBTQ+2
Immigration & Racial Equity Multicultural wellness center (Nepali/AAPI) 2
Library, Arts, Agriculture Arts & Culture Commission programs 2
Veterans & Seniors County Case Management - Seniors 2
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community-based leadership program for deaf residents 2
Justice Systems Front End Advocacy Teams - FAST (Public Defender)2
Justice Systems Community-based reentry employment 2
Justice Systems Community-based reentry support services 2
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Addressing Climate Change 2
Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Contra Costa CARES 2
Library, Arts, Agriculture Community and school-based arts programs 2
Innovations Fund Innovations Fund 2
Immigration & Racial Equity Stand Together Contra Costa (social/legal services) 2
Fire & Emergency Svcs Seasonal staffing 2
Justice Systems Young Adult diversion (DA)1
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Watershed protection 1
Safety Net Guaranteed basic income pilot 1
Justice Systems Community-based restorative justice 1
Immigration & Racial Equity Rental assistance for immigrants 1
Veterans & Seniors Nurse behavioral health clinicians 1
Early Childhood Svcs Childcare slots 1
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community-based mental health for LGBTQ+1
Fire & Emergency Svcs Veg Management 1
Fire & Emergency Svcs Emergency Preparedness 1
Early Childhood Svcs County family support services 1
Immigration & Racial Equity Public defenders/social workers for immigrants 1
Sorted by "Not Sure" 13
Attachment C
PRIORITY CATEGORY PRIORITY PROGRAM Not Sure
Veterans & Seniors Community-based aging services 1
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community-based mental health (various populations)1
Housing & Homelessness Tenant legal services/supports - county & community-based 1
Fire & Emergency Svcs Helicopter 0
Youth & Young Adults Permanent housing subsidies and child care 0
Health Svcs & Regional Hospital Hospital Services 0
Safety Net Civil/legal and flexible financial assistance for interpersonal violence victims 0
Youth & Young Adults Community-based youth centers & services 0
Immigration & Racial Equity Immigration legal services 0
Environment, Transportation, CDC, Public Works Accessible Transportation Strategic (ATS) plan 0
Fire & Emergency Svcs Reopen Closed Stations 0
Mental/Behavioral Health, Disabled Community-based mental health crisis response 0
Immigration & Racial Equity Office of Racial Equity & Social Justice 0
Fire & Emergency Svcs Wildfire mitigation/fuel reduction 0
Fire & Emergency Svcs East County Fire Services 0
Early Childhood Svcs Childhood mental health services 0
Early Childhood Svcs Services for children with disabilities 0
Sorted by "Not Sure" 14
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year36.8%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%
31.6%
31.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%26.3%
47.4%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
36.8%
47.4%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
26.3%
57.9%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year21.1%
15.8%
31.6%
31.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
15.8%
31.6%
36.8%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
31.6%
63.2%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
84.2%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
15.8%
31.6%
36.8%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
42.1%
47.4%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
84.2%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%
63.2%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year21.1%42.1%
36.8%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
31.6%
57.9%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%26.3%
21.1%26.3%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
26.3%
31.6%
21.1%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
26.3%
31.6%
21.1%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
21.1%
52.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
42.1%
15.8%
42.1%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
94.7%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
42.1%
47.4%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
63.2%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year21.1%
78.9%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%
73.7%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
15.8%
26.3%
42.1%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
31.6%
21.1%
36.8%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
26.3%
47.4%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%21.1%
47.4%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
21.1%
63.2%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
36.8%
36.8%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
26.3%
36.8%
15.8%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%21.1%
52.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
31.6%
57.9%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
73.7%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
47.4%
10.5%
15.8%26.3%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
42.1%
42.1%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
31.6%
57.9%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
26.3%
31.6%
26.3%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
73.7%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
94.7%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%
52.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
21.1%
31.6%
31.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
15.8%
63.2%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
26.3%
47.4%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year47.4%
31.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
78.9%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
42.1%
42.1%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%15.8%
57.9%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%21.1%
21.1%
31.6%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%
21.1%
47.4%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%21.1%
52.6%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%
15.8%
52.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
42.1%
26.3%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%
26.3%
36.8%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
57.9%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
73.7%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
63.2%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
21.1%
63.2%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
26.3%
57.9%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
36.8%
36.8%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
15.8%
31.6%
36.8%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
52.6%
31.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
31.6%
26.3%
31.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%31.6%
42.1%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
15.8%
36.8%
31.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year21.1%21.1%
47.4%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
42.1%
10.5%
21.1%26.3%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year21.1%
47.4%
21.1%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year21.1%
15.8%
36.8%
26.3%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
57.9%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
73.7%
15.8%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
57.9%
15.8%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
68.4%
21.1%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
63.2%
31.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
42.1%
15.8%
26.3%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
47.4%
21.1%
15.8%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year36.8%
42.1%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
15.8%
31.6%
36.8%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%
52.6%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
63.2%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
36.8%
21.1%
15.8%26.3%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
68.4%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%
31.6%
42.1%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
15.8%
26.3%
42.1%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%
21.1%
47.4%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
31.6%
21.1%
26.3%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year21.1%
68.4%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
31.6%
15.8%
47.4%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
63.2%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
42.1%
31.6%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
47.4%
42.1%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
31.6%
68.4%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
73.7%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
36.8%
52.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%31.6%
42.1%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
31.6%
63.2%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
15.8%
63.2%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%
63.2%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%31.6%
42.1%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year21.1%
57.9%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
52.6%
15.8%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
42.1%
31.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
31.6%
21.1%
36.8%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year47.4%
36.8%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
42.1%
26.3%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
21.1%42.1%
15.8%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
57.9%
21.1%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
36.8%
36.8%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
21.1%
68.4%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
31.6%
26.3%
26.3%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
15.8%
78.9%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year15.8%
15.8%
31.6%
36.8%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
47.4%
31.6%
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
36.8%
21.1%
36.8%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
Not Sure
No - Not this year
26.3%
52.6%
Attachment C
Yes - Top Priority
Yes - Secondary Priority
No - Not this year
Not sure
11.8%
17.6%
64.7%
Attachment C
Funding Recommendations
Measure X Community Advisory Board
Presented to the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors
By Mariana Moore, Chair & BK Williams, Vice Chair
October 12, 2021
There is no power for
change greater than
a community
discovering what it
cares about.”
Margaret J. Wheatley
Presentation Overview
●Background on Measure X
●Overview of Measure X Community Advisory Board
●Needs assessment process & key findings
●Funding recommendations for Fiscal Year 2021-22
●Looking ahead to FY 2022-23
Background on Measure X
●Measure X (half-cent, countywide sales tax ballot
measure) approved by voters in November 2020
●Estimated to generate $112 million for FY 2021-22
●Ballot language focused on supporting the county
hospital, emergency response, safety net services, early
childhood, protecting vulnerable populations, and
other essential county services
Measure X Community Advisory Board
●Established on February 2, 2021 by Board of
Supervisors
●10 Supervisorial District appointees, 7 at-large
members, 10 alternates
Community Advisory Board members
●Mariana Moore -Chair
●BK Williams -Vice Chair
●Kimberly Aceves-Iniquez
●Peter Benson*
●Steven Bliss *
●Genoveva Calloway*
●Jim Cervantes
●Kathy Chiverton
●Gigi Crowder *
●David Cruise
●Ruth Fernandez
●Cathy Hanville*
●Dr. Michelle Hernandez
●Diana Honig *
●Sharon Quezada Jenkins
●Susun Kim
●Lindy Lavender*
●Edith Pastrano
●Odessa LeFrancois
●Ali Saidi
●Jerry Short
●Melissa Stafford-Jones *
●Michelle Stewart
●Debbie Toth
●Sandro Trujillo*
●Pello Walker*
●Sandra Wall
* Alternate
Sup. Gioia appointees
Sup. Andersen appointees
Sup. Burgis appointees
Sup. Mitchoff appointees
Sup. Glover appointees
At-large members
Advisory Board responsibilities
●Oversee an annual needs assessment
●Create priority list of top service gaps
●Make funding priority recommendations to the Board of
Supervisors on 95% of the revenue generated by Measure X
●Provide annual report on outcomes & impact of allocated
funds
●Meet at least quarterly
Activities to Date
●Met 26 times between April 13 and October 6
●Consistently high attendance: 940+ total during needs assessment period
●Consistently strong participation by residents and stakeholders (public
comment, needs assessment panels, written testimony)
●Language access innovations: Spanish & American Sign Langauge
●Developed Vision Statement and Operating Principles
●Updated community needs assessment
●Prepared funding recommendations for FY 21-22
Measure X Vision Statement
Contra Costa County will have the necessary funds to
invest in and sustain a robust system of prevention
and care, and social and public services necessary to
support a vibrant community and ensure that all
residents have equitable opportunities to thrive.
Operating Principles
1.Shared responsibility to practice core values of equity, justice,
inclusion, compassion
2.Importance of strong safety net
3.Address prevention as well as current system gaps
4.Actively seek transformational ideas
5.Leverage other funding sources
Operating Principles
6. Resident POV: Interconnected, intersectional vs. turf and silos
7. Name inequities & disparities, and those most harmed by them
(especially anti-Black racism)
8. Economic opportunity and equity are at the heart of our work
9. Create a culture of inclusion, welcoming, and belonging
Community Needs Assessment
●Original needs assessment completed in 2019
○Co-chaired by Mariana Moore of Ensuring Opportunity and
Josh Anijar of Contra Costa Central Labor Council
●Significant events since then: pandemic, disparate economic
fallout, increased focus on racial justice
●Updated needs assessment process launched to assess current
community needs, strengths, and priorities
●Series of focused issue presentations with panels of county
staff, community-based organizations, and residents
Schedule of presentations
May 12 Seniors, disabled, veterans
May 19 Fire protection
May 26 Early childhood
June 9 School-aged youth & young adults
June 16 Healthcare
June 23 Mental/behavioral health
June 30 Housing & homelessness
July 7 Justice systems
July 14 Safety net (employment,
cash aid, food security, etc.)
July 21 Immigration, racial equity
July 28 Library, arts & culture,
Aug. 4 Environment, transportation,
public works, conservation &
development
Needs assessment: overarching themes
●Disparate impacts (health, economic) of Covid pandemic
●Racial/economic disparities also pre-dated the pandemic
●County departments need more flexible funding pools
●More investment needed in community-based, community-
embraced programs and services
●Strong appetite for bold, innovative and transformative
approaches
Needs assessment: 5 key areas of need
1.Support mental well-being (prevention, crisis response)
2.Increase equity and removing structural barriers
3.Ensure equitable access to health care, housing, childcare,
income opportunities, and food
4.Strengthen supports for residents of all generations
5.Create communities where all residents feel safe and welcome
Funding Recommendations for FY 21-22
5 GOAL AREAS:
1.Mental Well-Being
2.Equity in Action
3.Healthy Communities
4.Intergenerational Thriving
5.Welcoming & Safe Community
GOAL AREA 1: MENTAL WELL-BEING
We strive to be a community that supports the mental
and behavioral health well-being of all residents,
through prevention, crisis response services,
intersectional supports, and innovative cross-sector
approaches.
GOAL AREA 1: MENTAL WELL-BEING
Recommended Strategies:
1.Community-based mental health: Crisis Response Initiative
2.Childhood mental health services: Community grants to local community
health service providers serving younger children (age 0-5) to improve
children’s social and emotional development as a preventive strategy
3.Community-based mental health services: Addressing the needs of at -
risk populations
GOAL AREA 1: MENTAL WELL-BEING
5. Substance Abuse Treatment (community-based)
6. Mental health services for Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) residents
7. Community-based mental health for LGBTQ+ individuals
8. Medical response to mental health crisis: San Ramon Valley Fire model
GOAL AREA 2: EQUITY IN ACTION
We strive to be a community that prioritizes equity and
removes structural barriers that cause inequities and
poverty, so that all residents can thrive.
GOAL AREA 2: EQUITY IN ACTION
Recommended Strategies:
1.County Office of Racial Equity and Social Justice
2.East County community-based equity center (based on CC
County Racial Justice Coalition presentation)
3.Removal defense and case management for immigrant
residents, via Stand Together Contra Costa: including legal
representation across court systems and social service
workers to provide holistic, language-accessible, culturally-
responsive social services and navigation
GOAL AREA 2: EQUITY IN ACTION
4. Community-based and schools-based arts programs
5. Immigration-based legal services
6. Arts & Culture Commission programs
7. Innovation fund (to facilitate community-based responses to
service needs)
8. Community-based asylum support for LGBTQ+ individuals and
other immigrants
GOAL AREA 3: HEALTHY COMMUNITIES
We strive to be a community in which all residents
have access to affordable, timely, culturally-
responsive healthcare; adequate housing; high-quality
childcare; and nutritious food, all of which have
become more urgent as we address the ravages of the
pandemic.
GOAL AREA 3: HEALTHY COMMUNITIES
Recommended Strategies:
1.Expanded and comprehensive healthcare for remaining uninsured
residents via Contra Costa CARES
2.Local Housing Trust Fund: Serve as a funding mechanism for County
housing programs, including: tenant assistance; assistance for
unsheltered residents; the acquisition, preservation and rehabilitation
of affordable housing; creation of permanently affordable housing;
affordable housing for people with developmental disabilities;
community land trusts; and permanent supportive housing.
GOAL AREA 3: HEALTHY COMMUNITIES
3. Tenant legal services and supports, both county-based and community-
based
4. Subsidized child care
5. Permanent housing subsidies for youth and young adults
6. Community-based food distribution
7. Community-based training & employment
GOAL AREA 4:
INTERGENERATIONAL THRIVING
We strive to be a community that intentionally
strengthens and provides support for all residents and
for family members of all generations, including
children, youth, and older adults.
GOAL AREA 4:
INTERGENERATIONAL THRIVING
Recommended Strategies:
1.Services for children with disabilities: Improve access to comprehensive services
that support children with disabilities to be independent and included in society.
This strategy could include vouchers to providers on behalf of families for
necessary services. Provide childcare providers with consultation and guidance
to modify their services and programs to be inclusive of all children.
2.Accessible Transportation Strategic Plan (ATS)
3.Community-based youth centers/services in Central and East County
4.Community-based aging services
GOAL AREA 4:
INTERGENERATIONAL THRIVING
5. Guaranteed income pilot
6. East County multi-agency for disabled
7. Master Plan on Aging local implementation
8. Community-based restorative justice
9. County family support services
10. Discretionary funds for Child Protective Services and foster youth
GOAL AREA 5:
WELCOMING & SAFE COMMUNITY
We strive to be a community where all residents feel
safe and welcome, and receive emergency help when
they need it.
GOAL AREA 5:
WELCOMING & SAFE COMMUNITY
Recommended Strategies:
1.East County Fire Services
2.Re-open closed stations
3.Public Defender front-end advocacy teams
4.Fire/wildfire mitigation/fuel reduction
5.Community-based reentry support services
GOAL AREA 5:
WELCOMING & SAFE COMMUNITY
6. Community-based employment services
7. Abuse prevention and support, including building sustainable infrastructure,
civil & legal assistance, community victim advocates, community connectedness,
flexible financial assistance, and public health
8. Rental assistance for immigrants
9. Reimagine Public Safety initiative -countywide
10. Seasonal fire staffing
11. Multicultural wellness center for Nepali/AAPI residents
Additional Considerations
1.Prioritizing community-based strengths, wisdom, and services
2.Addressing racism
3.Addressing trauma
4.Bold and transformational focus
5.Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers
6.Prioritizing Measure X funds in context of overall County budget
Looking ahead
●Preparation of formal FY 21-22 needs assessment report
●Timing of FY 21-22 Measure X funding
●Planning for FY 22-23
○Updated needs assessment (FY 21-22 as baseline)
○Funding recommendations (FY 21-22 as baseline)
○Measuring impact of allocated Measure X funds
Acknowledgments
Our deepest appreciation goes to all those who made our work possible:
●Board of Supervisors
●County Administrator staff: Lisa Driscoll, Enid Mendoza
●Needs assessment presenters
●Members of the public
●Measure X Community Advisory Board members (2,500 hours and counting)
October 8, 2021
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors
1025 Escobar Street
Martinez, CA 94553
RE: Allocating Measure X Funds for Equitable Climate Resilience
Dear Members of the Board of Supervisors,
We know there are many pressing items to spend Measure X funding on, but we urge you to think about our
future safety and climate resilience by prioritizing at least $500,000 in annual Measure X funding to
support climate and equity goals within the Conservation and Development Department. Increased
capacity is critical to taking the coordinated climate response needed for the safety and resilience of the
County. The current lack of staff capacity at the County level will prevent the County from accessing
upcoming state and federal funding opportunities from SB 155 (CA), SB-170 (CA), and the $1 trillion
Infrastructure Bill (Federal) that could provide significant funding resources for climate adaptation and
equitable resilience programs to serve the County’s most vulnerable communities. These upcoming
opportunities come in addition to existing grant programs (see HMC SLR Staff Report, 4/6/21) that the
County could pursue, if there was a staff person dedicated to applying for, and managing, resilience projects.
The immediate health and safety of Contra Costa residents is at risk. In 10 years, Contra Costa will
likely see at least 6 inches of Sea Level Rise, and in just 30 years, the County will likely experience one to
two feet of Sea Level Rise (BCDC). These changes will have very real impacts on the County --in East
County alone, over 11,700 households are at risk of experiencing disruptive flooding -- many of
which are those already experiencing environmental justice concerns, inadequate housing resources, and
public health concerns. These impacts will disrupt business operations for the region, displace County
residents, and result in billions of dollars of damages.
But sea level rise and flooding are not the only impacts of climate change, wildfires and extreme heat are
already endangering County residents. California’s 11th District (covering most of Contra Costa County)
will likely experience 8 more days with temperatures over 100 degrees by 2050, if no adaptation or
mitigation action is taken (Union of Concerned Scientists).Measure X investments in public health and
services will be pointless if nothing is done to adapt to this changing climate.This increased capacity is
necessary for addressing the impacts of flooding, wildfire, and extreme heat through coordinated
efforts, grant funds, and proactive planning. The time to act is now.
For over 60 years, Greenbelt Alliance has worked towards a vision of a Bay Area made up of healthy,
thriving, resilient communities where all members are given equal protection from climate risks and equal
opportunities to enjoy the benefits of the environment and other nature-based infrastructure. In reviewing
the Report prepared by the Measure X Community Advisory Board (CAB), you will notice that equitable
climate adaptation and sustainability efforts are not included as a priority. The CAB prioritization process
favored well-defined projects, and it is our understanding that climate adaptation and climate equity fell
through the cracks -- not due to a lack of need or importance, but instead, due to a severe lack of staff
capacity and organization around topics of climate resilience and adaptation.Measure X funding for
increased capacity would be a catalytic step in protecting our communities from the impacts of
climate change.
Sincerely,
Amanda Brown-Stevens
Executive Director
Greenbelt Alliance
LAUREN JONAS
Artistic Director
SUSAN BORELIZ
Executive Director
Board of Directors
LAURIE MILLER &
CHERYL DE SIMONE
Presidents
FATIMA AFZAL
KRISTINA CIPRIANO
KAREN LAPOINTE
FRED LAMBRIGHT
UMBERTO LEONE
ELIZABETH GREEN-SAH
LANITA MIMS
ASHRAF HABIBULLAH
President Emeritus
KRISSY GRAY
Director of Operations
MICHELE JOHNSON
Development & Communications
DAN MEAGHER
Audience Development
SHANNON STOWE
PR Manager
EDWARD STEGGE &
ROSSELYN RAMIREZ
PEEK Associate Directors
JACK CARPENTER
Lighting Designer
DAVID HARTENSTEIN
Stage Manager
THOMAS ROBERTS
Technical Director
SALLY STREETS
Artistic Advisor
1
October 8, 2021
Via Email Only
clerkoftheboard@cob.cccounty.us
Jami.Morritt@cob.cccounty.us
Clerk of the Board
1025 Escobar Street
Martinez, CA 94553
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors:
<supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us>, <supervisor_burgis@bos.cccounty.us>,
<john_gioia@bos.cccounty.us>, <district5@bos.cccounty.us>,
<SupervisorMitchoff@bos.cccounty.us>
SUBJECT: Measure X Community Advisory Board - Goal 1 (Mental
Well-Being)
Dear Clerk of the Board of Contra Costa County and Supervisors Andersen,
Burgis, Gioia, Glover, and Mitchoff:
Further to my email of September 21, 2021, to the Measure X Community
Advisory Board (MX CAB) in support of the Arts and Mental/Behavioral Health
Programs, I am respectfully submitting this letter to you in specific reference to
Goal 1 (Mental Well-Being) identified in MX CAB’s Recommendations to the
Board of Supervisors.
After meeting with Supervisors Andersen and Mitchoff yesterday afternoon, I
wanted to reiterate that unfortunately due to Diablo Ballet’s declination of
funding this year from the California Arts Council and the Jump StArts Program
(mainly due to their focusing on other non-profit organizations with budgets of
$250,000 and below), Diablo Ballet is seeking to replace the funding lost and to
continue to be able to benefit other at-risk, under-represented children in Contra
Costa County. Therefore, on behalf of Diablo Ballet, I respectfully request an
allocation of $100,000 from Measure X funding.
Among other services, Diablo Ballet provides Dance Movement Therapy through
its PEEK (Performing Arts Education and Enrichment for Kids) Program, which
is a proven therapeutic approach to address mental health issues, among other
benefits. The PEEK program is recognized as one of the few programs of its kind
adhering to the California VAPA (Visual Arts/Performing Arts) standards.
PEEK is a social emotional and movement curriculum that teaches students how
to convey feelings and emotions and develop positive academic and pro-social
skills through facial expression and body movement. In addition, it teaches
students to use movement skills as a way of telling a personal story. PEEK has
served over 70,000 under-served school children since 1995, including Title I
Elementary Schools, Hospitals (such as hundreds of adolescents housed at the
Behavioral Health Unit at John Muir Hospital in Concord), Juvenile Hall in
Martinez, and Orin Allen Rehabilitation Facility in Byron.
Diablo Ballet developed PEEK to address the diminishing presence of arts
education in Title-I schools in the East Bay, where students are considered to
have higher-than-average risk of health, behavior, and academic problems.
According to a 2013 NEA report on the impact of dance in a K-12 setting, there is
a stronger correlation of higher academic achievement among at-risk students. In
schools where dance programs flourished, students’ attendance rises, teachers
were more satisfied, and a sense of community grew. This is the case for the
schools where PEEK has been integrated and expanded to serve additional
classrooms. KCBS Radio’s “Ask an Expert” series recent guest psychiatrist
specialist stated, “The social emotional well-being of adolescents has been hit the
hardest during Covid and it is going to take some time for them to get back
emotionally what they lost. Arts therapy is extremely recommended in these
times.”
PEEK Program staff addresses the lack of access to arts education among the
most vulnerable populations, including students with physical and emotional
disabilities. Diablo Ballet adjusts the curriculum based on students’ abilities, so
that all children are provided with opportunities for noncompetitive, success-
oriented activities. Diablo Ballet has served students with special needs including
students with autism, hearing impaired, and in a wheelchair. In these cases
where special accommodations are needed, program staff adapt activities for
students to participate freely. Attached is a photo collage.
For your further consideration, should you require it, I am prepared to submit a
detailed proposal supporting our funding request, including the scope, budget,
and outcomes.
Last, on behalf of my Community, I want to register my acknowledgment of and
gratitude to the entire Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator’s
Office. I also want to acknowledge the entire MX CAB (as led by Chair Moore and
Vice-Chair Williams) for their “model of civil discourse,” as was aptly noted at the
last MX CAB zoom meeting.
Respectfully submitted,
Susan Boreliz
Executive Director
Diablo Ballet
https://diabloballet.org/
c: Measure X Community Advisory Board (lisa.driscoll@cao.cccounty.us)
Lauren Jonas, Artistic Director and Co-Founder
P. O. Box 4700 Walnut Creek, California
94596
Phone: 925/943-1775
www.diabloballet.org
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE the Fiscal Year 2021/22 budget for the Congestion Management Agency (CMA), a function
performed by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (Authority), and APPROVE FY 2021/22 County
contributions of $144,576 to the CMA and $95,393 to the Regional Transportation Planning Committees
that assist with implementing Measure J (2004), as required by prior agreements.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No impact to the General Fund. The County contributions to the Congestion Management Agency and the
Regional Transportation Planning Committees are accounted for and funded from the annual operating
budgets approved by the Board of Supervisors for the Public Works Department and the Department of
Conservation and Development, using gas tax and Measure J Return-to-Source revenue.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Stephanie Kellogg (925)
655-2916
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 1
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Report on FY 2021/22 Budgets for the Congestion Management Agency and the Regional Transportation Planning
Committees
BACKGROUND:
The agreement that created the County's Congestion Management Agency (CMA) requires referral of its
budget to member jurisdictions. The Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs) were
established by the County and the cities to facilitate cooperative multi-jurisdictional transportation planning
in the four subregions of the County, pursuant to the Measure J Transportation Improvement and Growth
Management Program. Some RTPCs require member jurisdictions to review their proposed annual budgets.
The Board of Supervisors takes this action annually.
This Board Order also recommends approval of the budgeted financial contribution from Contra Costa
County to the CMA and the RTPCs for FY 2021/22, as required by agreements creating these entities.
Exhibit "A" compares the FY 2021/22 CMA and RTPC budgets and the proposed County contribution to
these entities to prior years. The sub-headings below explain the budgets for each Agency/Committee in
further detail.
Contra Costa Transportation Authority (Authority)
The Authority was created in 1988 to manage funds generated by a special half-cent transportation sales tax
("Measure C"), which was approved by voters to fund local transportation projects. The Authority also
administers the related voter-approved growth management program requirements. Measure J extended this
sales tax and growth management program to 2034. In 1992, the County and local cities entered into a Joint
Powers Agreement to designate the Authority as the County's CMA, pursuant to Proposition 111 (1990).
Although California law no longer requires each county to have a designated CMA, the local jurisdictions
have continued to support the CMA to facilitate the receipt and expenditure of state and federal
transportation funds administered by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC).
Contra Costa County's annual contribution to the CMA is based on two components: 1) the formula
[population and road miles] used by the State to distribute Proposition 111 gas tax revenue to cities and
counties, and 2) the amount of state and federal revenue received by the Authority to fund CMA functions.
The Authority primarily uses federal (Surface Transportation Program, Congestion Mitigation and Air
Quality) and state (State Transportation Planning, Programming, and Monitoring Program) revenues to
fund CMA activities. However, if these revenues are insufficient, member agencies contribute the balance
based on the aforementioned formula. As noted in the attached spreadsheet, local contributions are
estimates due to the inability to accurately project fluctuating federal and state revenues.
For FY 2021/22, the Authority’s overall budget is $174,388,333. The Authority’s Budget for FY 2021/22
for its CMA function is $5,216,899. The County contribution is $144,576, a $48,003 increase from the
previous fiscal year’s $96,573 contribution (approximately a 50% increase). The CMA budget was
circulated to the Public Managers Association, which approved it in May 2021. The highlights of the
Planning/CMA budget include:
$400,000 for Regional planning tasks
$600,000 for the Action Plan update
$350,000 for the Streetlight Data subscription
$200,000 for activity based model development
$400,000 for the East County Integrated Transit Study
$200,000 for the SR4 Express Lane Design Alteration analysis
$150,000 for the San Pablo Avenue Multimodal (Alameda County Transportation
Commission/West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee Cooperative
Agreement No. 18W.02)
$405,000 for CMP support, modeling, and monitoring
$125,000 for Model Maintenance and Consistency and Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans
$100,000 for the Countywide Transportation Plan
$250,000 for the Vehicle Miles Traveled Mitigation Exchange Framework
$250,000 for the Vision Zero implementation
Southwest Area Transportation (SWAT) Committee
SWAT is the RTPC established for the jurisdictions within the San Ramon Valley and the Lamorinda area.
Administrative support, currently provided by contracting with the City of San Ramon, consists of
compiling and distributing agendas, staff support at Committee meetings, providing summaries of each
meeting, and coordinating the SWAT Technical Advisory Committee. SWAT is funded by equal
contributions from the six participating jurisdictions. At the beginning of each billing period, which mirrors
the fiscal year, SWAT provides an estimated annual budget and member jurisdiction dues. However,
SWAT is unique among the RTPCs in that the jurisdictions are billed the actual annual member dues at the
end of the billing period for the prior fiscal year. For FY 2020/21, the actual SWAT budget was $33,700,
and the actual County contribution is $5,617. For FY 2021/22, the proposed SWAT budget and the County
contribution will be $33,700 and $5,617, respectively.
Transportation Partnership and Cooperation (TRANSPAC) Committee
TRANSPAC is the RTPC established for the jurisdictions in North-Central Contra Costa. A Managing
Director, who is contracted by TRANSPAC, provides administrative support. For FY 2021/22, the
TRANSPAC budget is $343,500. This budget amount includes $264,000 for administrative costs, a
$55,000 project reserve set aside for the future "I-680/Monument Boulevard Bicycle and Pedestrian
Improvement Feasibility Study", and a $24,500 contingency. Half of the annual total member jurisdiction
dues to TRANSPAC is apportioned equally to the six participating jurisdictions, while the other half is
apportioned based on the jurisdictions’ share of population and road mileage in the TRANSPAC area. For
FY 2021/22, the County member contribution is $37,822.
Transportation Planning Committee for East Contra Costa County
(TRANSPLAN)
TRANSPLAN Committee is the RTPC established for jurisdictions in Eastern Contra Costa. The
Department of Conservation and Development provides the administrative support to the TRANSPLAN
Committee, pursuant to a joint powers agreement that funds staff time and materials. The budget provides
for administrative support to the TRANSPLAN Committee and its technical advisory committee, staff
support to represent the Committee before other entities, and the ability to carry out the decisions of the
Committee. The budget is funded by equal contributions from the five participating jurisdictions. The total
FY 2021/22 TRANSPLAN budget is $34,822, and the County contribution is $2,310.
Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC)
TVTC, consisting of Contra Costa County and Alameda County jurisdictions in the Tri-Valley area,
adopted a Joint Exercise of Powers (JEPA) agreement in 2013, formally establishing it as an independent
entity. Responsibility for administrative support rotates every two years among the participating
jurisdictions. The TVTC budget for FY 2021/22 is $159,010, which consists of $59,010 for administrative
costs and $100,000 for special studies. Budget revenues are generated from an average annual 1% set aside
of the subregional transportation development impact fees and cover the agency's normal operating
expenditures. Thus, the County does not contribute to TVTC.
West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC)
WCCTAC is the RTPC established for jurisdictions and transit agencies in West Contra Costa. WCCTAC
has its own dedicated staff, headed by an executive director. WCCTAC's full budget consists of the budget
for WCCTAC Operations (Advisory Committee), WCCTAC Traffic Demand Management (TDM), and
WCCTAC Sub-regional Transportation Mitigation Program (STMP). The FY 2021/22 full budget for
WCCTAC is $8,448,556.
Member jurisdiction dues support WCCTAC Operations. WCCTAC consists of nine member jurisdictions,
each with one seat/vote, except the City of Richmond, which has three, for eleven total seats/votes. The
member jurisdiction dues are determined by dividing the WCCTAC Operations budget (after deductions
from other funding sources) by the number of seats held; therefore, the County pays one-eleventh (9.1%) of
WCCTAC's Operations budget. The FY 2021/22 Operations budget for WCCTAC is $650,892, and the
County member contribution is $49,644.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If not accepted, County staff will have no direction on how to fulfill fiscal and policy obligations relative to
funding the Congestion Management Agency and the Regional Transportation Planning Committees.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/311 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to
fully close a portion of Marsh Creek Road between Camino Diablo and Vineyard Parkway (City of
Brentwood), on November 15, 2021 and November 19, 2021 from 8:30 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., for the
purpose of strength testing gas transmission pipeline, Brentwood area. (District III)
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Applicant shall follow guidelines set forth by the Public Works Department. PG&E will be strength testing
their gas transmission pipelines that cross underneath Marsh Creek Road and for the safety of the traveling
public. PG&E will need to close Marsh Creek Road during the testing.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Applicant will be unable to close the road for planned activities. PG&E will not be able to safely perform
the gas transmission pipeline tests.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Bob Hendry (925)
374-2136
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of
Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, CHP, Sheriff - Patrol Division Commander
C. 2
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Approve & Authorize to fully close a portion of Marsh Creek Rd., on November 15, & 19, 2021, Brentwood area.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2021/311
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed: Resolution No.
2021/311
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 10/12/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/311
IN THE MATTER OF: Approving and Authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of Marsh
Creek Road between Camino Diablo and Vineyard Parkway (City of Brentwood), on November 15, 2021 and November 19,
2021 from 8:30 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., for the purpose of strength testing gas transmission pipeline, Brentwood area. (District III)
RC21-22
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that permission is granted to PG&E to fully close a portion of Marsh Creek Road
between Camino Diablo and Vineyard Parkway (City of Brentwood), except for emergency traffic, on November 15, 2021 and
November 19, 2021 for the period of 8:30 a.m. through 8:00 p.m., subject to the following conditions:
1. Traffic will be detoured per traffic control plan reviewed by Public Works.
2. All signing to be in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
3. PG&E shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County.
4. Provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 for Comprehensive General Public Liability
which names the County as an additional insured prior to permit issuance.
5. Obtain required permits and approvals from the City of Brentwood.
6. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriff’s Department, the California Highway Patrol and the Fire District.
Contact: Bob Hendry (925) 374-2136
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Bob Hendry -Engineering Services, CHP, Sheriff - Patrol Division
Commander
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a Consulting Services
Agreement with TRC Engineers, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $350,000 for on-call construction
management services for the period October 12, 2021 through September 30, 2024, Countywide. (Project
No.: Various) (All Districts)
FISCAL IMPACT:
Work performed under this on-call Consulting Services Agreement is funded by Developer Fees and Local
State and Federal funds for Local Road, Flood Control, and Airport Projects.
BACKGROUND:
The Public Works Department is involved in various projects in the County that require construction
management services for road, flood control, and airport projects. After a solicitation process, this firm was
selected as one of the seven firms to provide construction management services on an “on-call” basis. The
Consultant will augment Public Works staff on an as-needed basis. They will be used as an extension of
Public Works staff during busy times when extra help is needed or when in-house expertise is not available.
This on-call Consulting Services Agreement will be in effect for three years.
Government Code Section 31000 and 4525 authorizes the County to contract for services including the type
of construction management that TRC Engineers, Inc., provides.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Adelina Huerta,
925.313.2305
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 3
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Consulting Services Agreement with TRC Engineers, Inc., Countywide.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
This contract includes services provided by represented classifications, and the County has met its
obligations with the respective labor partner(s).
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Without approval from the Board of Supervisors, this Consulting Services Agreement will not be in effect.
A possible delay in completing projects requiring construction management services will occur. Executing
this Consulting Services Agreement will facilitate the process of design and construction for various Public
Works projects requiring construction management expertise.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE the Rodeo Pedestrian Enhancement Project contingency fund increase of $5,000 for a new
contingency fund total of $24,091, and a new payment limit of $215,001, effective October 12, 2021, as
recommended by the Public Works Director. Project No. 0662-6R4148 (District IV)
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Project is being funded by 33% Transportation Development Act (TDA) Grant Funds and 67% Local
Road Funds.
BACKGROUND:
The increased contingency is necessary to pay the contractor, Kerex Engineering, Inc., for additional costs
incurred as a result of re-location and installation of a pedestrian push button to meet ADA guidelines.
Additional funds needed to complete final pay for contract.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The lack of approval would prevent successful completion of this contract and prevent payment for the
additional work performed by the contractor.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Adelina Huerta,
925.313.2305
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 4
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contingency Fund Increase for the Rodeo Pedestrian Enhancement Project, Rodeo area.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute Contract Change Order
No. 2 with American Pavement Systems, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $325,000, Alamo, El Sobrante,
and North Richmond areas. Project No. 0672-6U2185 (District I, II, IV)
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Project is being funded by 100% Local Road Funds.
BACKGROUND:
Contract Change Order No. 2, is necessary to pay the contractor, American Pavement Systems, Inc., for
additional costs incurred as a result of adding additional streets, and a calculating error discovered
determining total square yardage of roads to be slurry sealed. The change order is necessary to compensate
the contractor for additional traffic control, construction area signs and clearing and grubbing.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The lack of approval would prevent successful completion of this contract.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Adelina Huerta,
925.313.2305
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 5
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract Change Order for the 2020 Surface Treatment Project, Alamo, El Sobrante, and North Richmond areas.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/315 accepting completion of the warranty period for the Subdivision
Agreement, and release of cash deposit for faithful performance, subdivision SD12-09298, for a project
developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works
Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II)
FISCAL IMPACT:
100% Developer Fees.
BACKGROUND:
The public road improvements have met the guaranteed performance standards for the warranty period
following completion and acceptance of the improvements.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The developer will not receive a refund of the cash deposit, the Subdivision Agreement and
performance/maintenance surety bond will not be exonerated, and the billing account will not be liquidated
and closed.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Randolf Sanders (925)
313-2111
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of
Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Ronald Lai, Engineering Services, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Cinda
Tovar- Design & Construction, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Chris Low - City of San Ramon, Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corp., Hartford Fire Insurance Company
C. 6
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Accepting completion of warranty period for Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD12-09298, San Ramon
(Dougherty Valley area) area.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2021/315
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed: Resolution No.
2021/315
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 10/12/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/315
IN THE MATTER OF: Accepting completion of warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement, and release of cash deposit for
faithful performance, subdivision SD12-09298, for a project developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as
recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II)
WHEREAS, on March 31, 2020, this Board resolved that the improvements in subdivision SD12-09298 were completed as
provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and now on the recommendation
of the Public Works Director;
The Board hereby FINDS that the improvements have satisfactorily met the guaranteed performance standards for the period
following completion and acceptance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to:
REFUND the $18,000.00 cash deposit (Auditor’s Deposit Permit No. DP741185 dated July 17, 2017) plus interest to Toll
Brothers, Inc., in accordance with Government Code Section 53079, if appropriate, Ordinance Code Section 94-4.406, and the
subdivision agreement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon completion of the warranty and maintenance period, the San Ramon City Council shall
accept the civil improvements for maintenance in accordance with the Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the warranty period has been completed and the Subdivision Agreement and surety bond,
Bond No. 39BSBHR0973, dated June 13, 2017, issued by Hartford Fire Insurance Company, are EXONERATED.
Contact: Randolf Sanders (925) 313-2111
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Ronald Lai, Engineering Services, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Hallford
-Mapping , Cinda Tovar- Design & Construction, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Chris Low - City of San Ramon, Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corp.,
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/316 accepting completion of the warranty period for the Subdivision
Agreement, and release of cash deposit for faithful performance, subdivision SD17-09299, for a project
developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works
Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II)
FISCAL IMPACT:
100% Developer Fees.
BACKGROUND:
The public road improvements have met the guaranteed performance standards for the warranty period
following completion and acceptance of the improvements.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The developer will not receive a refund of the cash deposit, the Subdivision Agreement and performance
surety bond will not be exonerated, and the billing account will not be liquidated and closed.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Randolf Sanders (925)
313-2111
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of
Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Ronald Lai, Engineering Services, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Cinda
Tovar- Design & Construction, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Chris Low - City of San Ramon, Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corp., Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
C. 7
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Accepting completion of warranty period for Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD17-09299, San Ramon
(Dougherty Valley) area.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2021/316
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed: Resolution No.
2021/316
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 10/12/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/316
IN THE MATTER OF: Accepting completion of warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement, and release of cash deposit for
faithful performance, subdivision SD17-09299, for a project developed Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as
recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II)
WHEREAS, on May 21, 2019, this Board resolved that the improvements in subdivision SD17-09299 were completed as
provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and now on the recommendation
of the Public Works Director;
The Board hereby FINDS that the improvements have satisfactorily met the guaranteed performance standards for the period
following completion and acceptance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to:
REFUND the $12,000.00 cash deposit (Auditor’s Deposit Permit No. 744864, dated September 1, 2017) to Toll Brothers, Inc., in
accordance with Government Code Section 53079, if appropriate, Ordinance Code Section 94-4.406, and the subdivision
agreement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon completion of the warranty and maintenance period, the San Ramon City Council shall
accept the civil improvements for maintenance in accordance with the Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the warranty period has been completed and the Subdivision Agreement and surety bond,
Bond No. PB00579800079, dated August 7, 2017, issued by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, are EXONERATED.
Contact: Randolf Sanders (925) 313-2111
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Ronald Lai, Engineering Services, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Hallford
-Mapping , Cinda Tovar- Design & Construction, Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Chris Low - City of San Ramon, Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corp.,
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/317 accepting completion of the warranty period for the Subdivision
Agreement, and release of cash deposit for faithful performance, subdivision SD17-09300, for a project
developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works
Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II)
FISCAL IMPACT:
100% Developers Fees.
BACKGROUND:
The public road improvements have met the guaranteed performance standards for the warranty period
following completion and acceptance of the improvements.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The developer will not receive a refund of the cash deposit, the Subdivision Agreement and performance
surety bond will not be exonerated, and the billing account will not be liquidated and closed.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Randolf Sanders (925)
313-2111
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of
Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Ronald Lai, Engineering Services, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Ruben
Hernandez - DCD, Chris Low - City of San Ramon, Cinda Tovar- Design & Construction, Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corp., Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
C. 8
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Accepting completion of warranty period for Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD17-09300, San Ramon
(Dougherty Valley) area.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2021/317
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed: Resolution No.
2021/317
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 10/12/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/317
IN THE MATTER OF: Accepting completion of warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement, and release of cash deposit for
faithful performance, subdivision SD17-09300, for a project developed Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as
recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II)
WHEREAS, on October 22, 2019, this Board resolved that the improvements in subdivision SD17-09300 were completed as
provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and now on the recommendation
of the Public Works Director;
The Board hereby FINDS that the improvements have satisfactorily met the guaranteed performance standards for the period
following completion and acceptance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to:
REFUND the $22,500.00 cash deposit (Auditor’s Deposit Permit No. 761124, dated May 4, 2018) to Toll Brothers, Inc., in
accordance with Government Code Section 53079, if appropriate, Ordinance Code Section 94-4.406, and the subdivision
agreement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon completion of the warranty and maintenance period, the San Ramon City Council shall
accept the civil improvements for maintenance in accordance with the Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the warranty period has been completed and the Subdivision Agreement and surety bond,
Bond No. PB00579800090, dated April 19, 2018, issued by Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company, are EXONERATED.
Contact: Randolf Sanders (925) 313-2111
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Ronald Lai, Engineering Services, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Hallford
-Mapping , Ruben Hernandez - DCD, Chris Low - City of San Ramon, Cinda Tovar- Design & Construction, Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corp.,
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to execute a month-to-month hangar
rental agreement with Fred McDonald and Fionn O’Neill for a modernized, large north-facing hangar at
Buchanan Field Airport effective October 1, 2021 in the monthly amount of $640.00, Pacheco area.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Airport Enterprise Fund will realize $7,680.00 annually.
BACKGROUND:
On September 1, 1970, Buchanan Airport Hangar Company entered into a 30-year lease with Contra Costa
County for the construction of seventy-five (75) hangars and eighteen (18) aircraft shelters/shade hangars at
Buchanan Field Airport. In 1977 Buchanan Airport Hangar Company amended their lease to allow for the
construction of another 30-year lease with Contra Costa County for the construction of seventeen (17)
additional hangars. Buchanan Airport Hangar Company was responsible for the maintenance and property
management of the property during the lease period.
On
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Beth Lee, (925)
681-4200
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 9
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Keith Freitas, Airports Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to execute a hangar rental agreement with
Buchanan Field Airport Hangar tenant
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
September 1, 2000, the ninety-three (93) t- and shade hangars at Buchanan Field reverted to the County
ownership pursuant to the terms of the above lease.
On November 14, 2006, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved the form of the
T-Hangar and Shade Hangar Rental Agreement for use with renting the County's t-hangars, shade
hangars, medium hangars, and executive hangars at Buchanan Field Airport.
On February 16, 2007, the additional seventeen (17) hangars at Buchanan Field reverted back to the
County pursuant to the above referenced lease. This row included six (6) large hangars which were not
covered by the approved T-Hangar and Shade Hangar Rental Agreement.
On February 23, 2007, Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved the new Large Hangar
Rental Agreement for use with the large East Ramp Hangars.
On January 16, 2009, Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approved an amendment to the
T-Hangar and Shade Hangar Rental Agreement and the Large Hangar Rental Agreement (combined
"Hangar Rental Agreements") which removed the Aircraft Physical Damage Insurance requirement. The
Hangar Rental Agreements are the current forms in use for rental of all the County hangars at Buchanan
Field Airport.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
A negative action will cause a loss of revenue to the Airport Enterprise Fund.
ATTACHMENTS
F-6 Hangar Agmt McDonald_O'Neill
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to execute an Exclusive Negotiating
Agreement with Concord Aero 10, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for the negotiation of a
long-term lease of approximately 9-acres of land on the west side of the Buchanan Field Airport,
Concord/Pacheco Area.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no negative impact on the General Fund. The Airport Enterprise Fund could realize lease and other
revenues. The County General Fund could realize sales tax and other revenues if a lease is successfully
negotiated.
BACKGROUND:
After the County received a proposal from Montecito Development Company (Montecito) for the
development of a 9-acre site on the west side of Buchanan Field Airport, on February 25, 2020, the Board
authorized the Director of Airports, or designee, to negotiate a long-term ground lease and development
terms for the site. After a solicitation for competitive interest in the site, no other proposals were received.
Montecito
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Beth Lee, (925)
681-4200
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 10
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Keith Freitas, Airports Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Exclusive Negotiating Agreement – Concord Aero 10, LLC for Land at the Buchanan Field Airport
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
subsequently formed Concord Aero 10, LLC (Concord Aero 10) to enter into the exclusive negotiating
agreement with the County and to develop the property.
Concord Aero 10 desires to lease the site, which is located on the west side of Buchanan Field Airport
generally between Sally Ride Drive and the airfield, and develop it for aviation purposes. The exclusive
negotiation agreement will enable Concord Aero 10 to actively market the property in order to identify a
tenant or tenants. In addition, the exclusive negotiating agreement will enable the County and Concord Aero
10 to feel confident in proceeding with the CEQA process, as mandated by State law.
Development of this 9-acre vacant parcel would expand economic development activity at the Buchanan
Field Airport and lead to increased revenues to the Airport Enterprise Fund and added local jobs.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
A delay in entering into an exclusive negotiating agreement will delay development of vacant land at
Buchanan Field Airport and may negatively impact the Airport Enterprise Fund and County General Fund.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
DENY claims filed by Jacqueline Moskus, Alisha M. Rohrbacher, and Thomas Rohrbacher.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
DENY claims filed by Jacqueline Moskus, Alisha M. Rohrbacher, and Thomas Rohrbacher.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Not acting on the claims could extend the claimants’ time limits to file actions against the
County.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Risk Management
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 11
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Claims
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/320 recognizing October 16, 2021 as Community Cat Day in Contra Costa
County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
October 16th is nationally recognized as "National Feral Cat Day,” a day dedicated to educating
communities about feral cat (community cat) population control, including trap-neuter-return (TNR), the
most humane and effective means of reducing community cat populations. Contra Costa County is
dedicated to providing resources to educate the community about TNR programs, promoting the
importance of low cost spay and neuter options in our County and supporting groups and individuals that
will help to manage the free roaming population of cats. In light of these efforts, Contra Costa Animal
Services seeks to increase community cat awareness by recognizing October 16 th as Community Cat Day
in Contra Costa County.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Delaina Gillaspy,
925-608-8413
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm
C. 12
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Beth Ward, Animal Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:ADOPT Resolution recognizing October 16, 2021 as Community Cat Day in Contra Costa County
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
2021/320
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 10/12/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/320
Recognizing October 16, 2021 as "National Feral Cat Day,” a day dedicated to educating communities about feral cat
(community cat) population control, including trap-neuter-return (TNR), the most humane and effective means of reducing
community cat populations; and
WHEREAS, TNR stops the cycle of breeding, eliminates the euthanasia of healthy animals and greatly reduces complaints about
costs associated with community cats; and WHEREAS, Scientific evidence and experience in the United States and other
countries demonstrates that nonlethal TNR accompanied by ongoing community cat colony management is the only lasting way
to reduce feral cat population; and WHEREAS, Caring individuals and groups are effectively applying TNR to community cat
colonies in Contra Costa County; and
WHEREAS, Contra Costa County is dedicated to providing resources to educate the community about TNR programs, promoting
the importance of low cost spay and neuter options in our County and supporting groups and individuals that will help to manage
the free roaming population of cats.
WHEREAS, Contra Costa Animal Services embraces TNR and provides a public Community Cat Program to assist residents and
groups in receiving free spay/neuter and vaccination for Community Cats, as well as continuing to explore ways to increase
access for our residents to low-cost or free public spay/neuter resources, to help Contra Costa County communities manage
community cat colonies. WHEREAS, The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and Contra Costa Animal Services
encourages nonlethal TNR accompanied by ongoing community cat management as the most effective, humane method of
reducing community cat populations in this County;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors recognize October 16, 2021, as
"Contra Costa County Community Cat Day" and call upon the people and businesses of Contra Costa County to participate in the
spaying and neutering of feral and community cats in their neighborhoods.
Contact: Delaina Gillaspy, 925-608-8413
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: , Deputy
cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Ori Tzvieli, M.D.,
925-608-5267
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Nati Flores
C. 13
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Proclaiming October 24-30, 2021 as "Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week"
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
2021/330
In the matter of:Resolution No. 2021/330
PROCLAIMING OCTOBER 24 – 30, 2021 AS “CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTION WEEK”
WHEREAS, Contra Costa County recognizes the importance of healthy homes and a
safe environment for all of our children and families; and
WHEREAS, an important part of ensuring a safe environment is preventing Contra
Costa children from being poisoned by lead in their homes and community; and
WHEREAS, research shows that children are harmed by even low levels of lead, and
that lead poisoning often has few or no early visible symptoms; and
WHEREAS, lead poisoning can have lifelong effects, especially for children, ranging
from cognitive and behavioral problems to delayed growth and learning disabilities;
and
WHEREAS, Contra Costa children may be exposed to lead from deteriorated
lead-based paint and contaminated soil, and from other sources such as cultural and
consumer products, lead brought home from the workplace, and historic
environmental contamination; and
WHEREAS, to keep our children safe and healthy, all children under the age of six
should be assessed for lead exposure, at-risk children should receive blood tests for
lead; and lead hazards must be identified and removed from a child’s environment;
and
WHEREAS, lead poisoning is preventable through greater awareness and elimination
of lead hazards; using lead-safe work practices when disturbing lead-based paint; and
ensuring that children have a healthy diet and access to health care; and
WHEREAS, the State of California has enabled the Contra Costa Lead Poisoning
Prevention Project (LPPP) to offer services to these children, and since 1993 the
LPPP has been working to reduce the number of lead poisoned children in Contra
Costa through case management, outreach and education, and early intervention
services; and
WHEREAS, screening results show that Contra Costa children are still being exposed
to the dangers of lead; and
WHEREAS, lead can be found in many products and locations, lead exposure is
preventable. We encourage all County of Contra Costa residents to learn about the
risk and potential sources of lead exposure, and the steps we can take to protect our
children.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors proclaims October 24-30, 2021 as
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors proclaims October 24-30, 2021 as
Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week in Contra Costa County, to prevent childhood lead poisoning
through increased community awareness and activities supporting the elimination of lead from our homes,
consumer products and other sources, and the environment.
___________________
DIANE BURGIS
Chair, District III Supervisor
______________________________________
JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN
District I Supervisor District II Supervisor
______________________________________
KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER
District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an
action taken
and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on
the date
shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator
By: ____________________________________, Deputy
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: James Lyons,
510-942-2222
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C. 14
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Declaring COVID-19 Misinformation as a Public Health Crisis
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Item C.14 was considered under item D.1 to allow for discussion and subsequently adopted as
presented
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 2021/337
In the matter of:Resolution No. 2021/337
Declaring COVID-19 Misinformation as a Public Health Crisis
WHEREAS, Health misinformation has significantly undermined public health efforts
and the unmitigated proliferation of health misinformation has created a culture of
mistrust and has prolonged the COVID-19 pandemic, endangering the health and
safety of all Contra Costa County residents and visitors; and
WHEREAS, The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in over 95,000
cases and 921 deaths in Contra Costa County as of September 25, 2021; and
WHEREAS, The spread of COVID-19 has had a devastating impact on our health and
safety, our regional economy, our elder residents, our communities of color, our
mental health, the educational development of our children and every aspect of our
lives; and
WHEREAS, In Contra Costa County, there are significantly lower vaccination rates
for residents 20-29 years old, residents who identify themselves as White, Latinx,
African-American, and more than one race/ethnicity, men, and in certain
communities across the county and particularly in East and West County; and
WHEREAS, The COVID-19 vaccines have met the Food and Drug Administration’s
(FDA) rigorous scientific standards for safety, effectiveness, and manufacturing
quality and have been proven to be safe and effective; and
WHEREAS, The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, brand name Comirnaty, has received full
FDA approval and been proven to be highly effective in preventing serious disease,
hospitalization and death from COVID-19 and that its benefits outweigh its risks; and
WHEREAS, The COVID-19 vaccine is available to everyone in Contra Costa County
at no cost, regardless of income, residency within the county, health coverage or
immigration status, and is administered by health professionals, like nurses and
doctors; and
WHEREAS, misinformation has caused confusion and has led to eligible people
declining COVID-19 vaccines, rejecting public health measures such as face
coverings and physical distancing, and using unproven treatments; and
WHEREAS, On July 15, 2021, the United States Surgeon General issued his first
advisory describing the “urgent threat” posed by the rise of false information of
COVID-19 – one that continues to put “lives at risk” and prolong the pandemic; and
WHEREAS, Recent surges in infections and hospitalizations from COVID-19 in
Contra Costa have highlighted the importance of clear and unequivocal
communications from public officials that vaccines are the best protection against
severe illness and hospitalizations; and
WHEREAS, Urgent action is needed to curb the spread of COVID-19 by combating
misinformation, thereby supporting our healthcare system and saving lives; and
WHEREAS, There would be substantial detriment on Contra Costa County and its
residents and visitors if not acted upon immediately; and
WHEREAS, Trusted community members, such as health professionals, faith leaders,
educators, and leaders of Black, Indigenous, Latinx and other communities of color
nationwide and in Contra Costa have spoken directly to their communities to address
COVID-19 related questions by town halls, meetings, social media, and traditional
media; and
WHEREAS, The Board of Supervisors and the County of Contra Costa is troubled by
and actively discourages the spread of COVID-19 misinformation as it is a dangerous
threat to public health; and
WHEREAS, Contra Costa Health Services continues to carry out its mission to care
for and protect all Contra Costa County residents from COVID-19, especially our
most vulnerable; and
WHEREAS, Contra Costa Health Services engages with our communities through
building partnerships and trust with community organizations and residents, trusted
messengers, and COVID-19 Ambassadors; and
WHEREAS, Contra Costa Health Services maintains a coronavirus website as a
source of credible, up-to-date information regarding COVID-19 for Contra Costa
residents at cchealth.org.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County declares
that COVID-19 health misinformation is an urgent public health crisis affecting our entire community and
the County of Contra Costa commits to combating health misinformation and curbing the spread of
falsehoods that threaten the health and safety of our residents; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the
Board of Supervisors and the County of Contra Costa will develop and support policies and strategies that
protect the health and safety of Contra Costa County residents through the promotion of evidence-based
interventions, including face coverings and vaccination; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Contra
Costa Health Services will continue to share facts and scientific information about COVID-19, to correct
misinformation including vaccine myths, to identify and give a platform to culturally relevant medical
experts and trusted messengers, to respond to questions and requests for information on social media, and to
work with our media and community partners to reach a broad audience with factual, timely information.
___________________
DIANE BURGIS
Chair, District III Supervisor
______________________________________
JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN
District I Supervisor District II Supervisor
______________________________________
KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER
District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an
action taken
and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on
the date
shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator
By: ____________________________________, Deputy
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Lisa Chow,
(925)521-7100
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc:
C. 15
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:In the Matter of Recognizing the 60th Anniversary of the City of Pleasant Hill
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution
2021/338
In the matter of:Resolution No. 2021/338
In the Matter of Recognizing the 60th Anniversary of the City of Pleasant Hill
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill was incorporated on November 14, 1961 as the 12th
city in Contra Costa County, a general-law city under the statutes of the State of
California; and
WHEREAS, municipal government is a catalyst for the involvement of residents,
business, and organizations in the development and maintenance of a well-integrated
community; and
WHEREAS, through the careful stewardship of its City Council and government, the City
has grown from a population of 23,800 in 1961 to 34,700 in 2020; and
WHEREAS, Pleasant Hill is an engaged community participating in civic awareness
programs and services such as Community Service Day, the Local Government
Leadership Academy; and the volunteer-run Senior Van Service; and
WHEREAS, the City, recognizing the challenges inherent in a vibrant and diverse
community, has created advisory bodies designed to help provide information and
support to all areas of the community, such as the Commission on Aging, Civic
Action Commission, Education Commission, Diversity Commission, Planning
Commission, Architectural Review Commission, Traffic Safety Commission, and
Chief’s Advisory Panel; and
WHEREAS, the City of Pleasant Hill is dedicated to maintaining a safe, pleasant
environment within the community by providing effective governance and the
efficient and professional delivery of public services, and in the process of providing
representative local government, the City identifies and anticipates concerns,
problems and opportunities and takes actions to address them; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County desires to mark the
occasion of this 60th anniversary; and
WHEREAS, the residents, many businesses, and visitors of and to the City of Pleasant
Hill are marking its 60th anniversary with celebrations and special events in honor of
its history, culture, and community pride in being “at the center of everything.”
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors recognizes and
congratulates the City of Pleasant Hill on its 60 th Anniversary.
___________________
DIANE BURGIS
Chair, District III Supervisor
______________________________________
JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN
District I Supervisor District II Supervisor
______________________________________
KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER
District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an
action taken
and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on
the date
shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator
By: ____________________________________, Deputy
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Teresa Gerringer /
925-723-2884
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Antonia Welty, Deputy
cc:
C. 16
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Recognizing and commemorating the 76th anniversary of National Disability Employment Awareness Month.
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Speakers: No name given; Jamal Burrell, San Francisco; Otto Iber; Cheryl Sudduth; Debbie Toth.
ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 2021/340
In the matter of:Resolution No. 2021/340
In the matter of Recognizing and commemorating the 76th anniversary of National Disability Employment Awareness
Month.
WHEREAS, October 2021 marks the 76th anniversary of National Disability
Employment Awareness Month; and
WHEREAS, The purpose of National Disability Employment Awareness Month is to
educate about disability employment issues and celebrate the many and varied
contributions of America's workers with disabilities; and
WHEREAS, The history of National Disability Employment Awareness Month traces
back to 1945 when Congress enacted a law declaring the first week in October each
year "National Employ the Physically Handicapped Week;" and
WHEREAS, In 1962, the word "physically" was removed to acknowledge the
employment needs and contributions of individuals with all types of disabilities; and
WHEREAS, In 1988, Congress expanded the week to a month and changed the name
to National Disability Employment Awareness Month; and
WHEREAS, Workplaces welcoming of the talents of all people, including people with
disabilities, are a critical part of our efforts to build an inclusive community and
strong economy; and
WHEREAS, Activities during this month will reinforce the value and talent people
with disabilities add to our workplaces and communities and affirm Contra Costa
County’s commitment to an inclusive community that increases access and
opportunities to all, including individuals with disabilities.
Therefore, be it RESOLVED, That the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors recognize and
commemorate the 76th anniversary of National Disability Employment Awareness Month; and be it further
RESOLVED, That the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors call upon employers, schools, and other
community organizations in Contra Costa County observe October with appropriate programs and
activities, and to advance its important message that people with disabilities add value and talent to our
workplaces and communities; and be it further
___________________
DIANE BURGIS
Chair, District III Supervisor
______________________________________
JOHN GIOIA CANDACE ANDERSEN
District I Supervisor District II Supervisor
______________________________________
KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER
District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an
action taken
and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on
the date
shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator
By: ____________________________________, Deputy
RECOMMENDATION(S):
REAPPOINT Clark Wallace to the District 3 seat on the Assessment Appeals Board to a term expiring
September 3, 2023, as recommended by Supervisor Diane Burgis.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The term for this seat expired September 1, 2020. Applications were accepted and the recommendation to
reappoint the above individual was then determined.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The seat would remain vacant.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Lea Castleberry
925-252-4500
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 17
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:REAPPOINTMENT TO THE ASSESSMENT APPEALS BOARD
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPOINT, in lieu of election, Don Wagenet to the Board of Trustees of Reclamation District No. 2024
(Orwood and Palm Tracts) for a term ending December 4, 2025.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors received correspondence from Dante Nomellini, District Secretary and Counsel
for Reclamation District 2024 (Orwood and Palm Tracts), requesting an appointment to the Board of
Trustees of the District in lieu of election. Mr. Nomellini reports that pursuant to a notice calling for
nomination petitions for one position on the Board of Trustees, the District received a single nomination
petition. No petition requesting an election has been received. Therefore, no election will be conducted and
at this time; the District requests that the Board of Supervisors appoint Don Wagenet to the Board of
Trustees of Reclamation District 2024, with a term commencing December 3, 2021 and ending December
4, 2025.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The proposed nominee to the Board of Trustees for Reclamation District 2024 would not be approved,
which may hinder the Board of Trustees in achieving a quorum and conducting District business.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Lauren Hull, (925)
655-2007
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 18
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Reclamation District 2024 (Orwood and Palm Tracts) Board of Trustees Appointment
ATTACHMENTS
Reclamation District 2024
Letter
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPOINT, in lieu of election, James Price, Arthur John Hanson, and Walter Pierce to serve on the Board of
Trustees of Reclamation District 799 (Hotchkiss Tract) each for terms of four years, commencing
December 3, 2021 and concluding December 4, 2025.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors received correspondence from Dina Holder, District Secretary for Reclamation
District 799, requesting appointments to the Board of Trustees of the District in lieu of elections. Ms.
Holder reports that the Board of Trustees of the District, at its regular meeting on July 29, 2021, adopted a
resolution to call for an all-mailed ballot election to fill three four-year terms that are set to expire in
December 2021. Subsequent to posting the notice calling for nominations, the District received only three
filing petitions, from James Price, Arthur John Hanson, and Walter Pierce. Therefore, the District election
scheduled for November 9, 2021 is uncontested and no election will be conducted. At this time, the District
respectfully requests that the Board of Supervisors appoint James Price, Arthur John Hanson, and Walter
Pierce each to four-year terms on the Board of Trustees of Reclamation District 799. The terms will
commence on December 3, 2021 and conclude on December 4, 2025.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Lauren Hull, (925)
655-2007
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 19
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Reclamation District 799 (Hotchkiss Tract) Board of Trustees Appointment
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The proposed nominees to the Board of Trustees for Reclamation District 799 (Hotchkiss Tract) would
not be approved, which may hinder the Board of Trustees in achieving a quorum and conducting the
District's business.
ATTACHMENTS
Reclamation District 799 Letter
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPOINT Lara DeLaney to Management Seat #1 and Amrita Kaur to Management Seat #2 on the
Advisory Council on Equal Employment Opportunity to complete the current terms that will expire on
November 30, 2022, and November 30, 2024, respectively.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
BACKGROUND:
The Advisory Council for Equal Employment Opportunity (ACEEO) was established in July 1991 to serve
as an advisory committee to the Board of Supervisors regarding the implementation of the County's
Affirmative Action Plan, to review the Affirmative Action Program, and to recommend actions to facilitate
the attainment of the County's goal for affirmative action. The Council is composed of 13 members and a
Board committee reviews nominations to all seats except those designated for County managers and labor
unions. Terms of office for seats reviewed by the Board Committee are three years.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: 17072465145
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 20
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Karen Caoile, Director of Risk Management
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:ACEEO Member Nominations
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
In January 2020, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution Nos. 2020/1 and 2020/2, which stipulate
that applicants for At Large/Non-Agency-Specific seats on specified bodies are to be considered by a
Board subcommittee. The Resolutions further permit a Board Committee to select a screening committee
to assist in interviewing applicants for an appointment for certain bodies, including the ACEEO.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The ACEEO will not be able to function as intended due to a lack of diverse members.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
None
ATTACHMENTS
Delaney Application
Kaur Application
Contra
Costa
County
I Print Form I
Please return completed applications to:
Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
1025 Escobar Street, 1st Floor
Martinez, CA 94553
or email to: ClerkofTheBoard@cob.cccounty.us
BOARDS, COMMITTEES, AND COMMISSIONS APPLICATION
First Name
Lara
Home Address - Street
Phone (best number to reach you)
925-655-2057
City
Last Name
Delaney
Zip Code
Email
lara.delaney@cao.cccounty.us
Resident of Supervisorial District (if out of County, please enter N/ A): 5
Do you work in Contra Costa County? 0 Yes O No If Yes, in which District do you work? .... I ___ _,
EDUCATION Check appropriate box if you possess one of the following:
0High School Diploma D CA High School Proficiency Certificate D G.E.D. Certificate
Colleges or Universities Attended Course of Study/Major Degree Awarded
University of California at Santa Cruz Literature � Yes 0No
Universitv of Chicaoo Public Policy �Yes 0No
nYes 0No
Other Training Completed: Government Alliance on Race & Equity (GARE) Racial Equity Training
Board, Committee, or Commission Name Seat Name
Management Seat #1 ACEEO
Have you ever attended a meeting of the advisory board for which you are applying?
Please check one: � Yes D No If Yes, how many? 1
Please explain why youwould like to serve on this particular board, committee, or commission.
I would like to be a helpful ally in the movement to advance equity and justice in our community. I have been engaged with issues of racial justice for the past decade with the County Administrator's Office of Reentry & Justice (now incorporated into the Probation Department). I have also been engaged in community development through my service on the Martinez City Council for the past 19 years. With this background, I hope to make a meaningful contribution to the ACEEO, working i1 collaboration with the members of the Council to ensure equal employment opportunities, equity, and economic advancement for all.
Describe your qualifications for this appointment. (NOTE: you may also include a copy of your resume with this
application)
I am presently a Senior Deputy County Administrator in the Contra Costa County Administrator's Office, where I have worked for 23 years. I am also a member of the Martinez City Council, first elected in 2002. I have led the County's Office o1 Reentry & Justice (2017-2020) and participated in the Government Alliance on Race & Equity's "Racial Equity Learning" cohorts in 2017 and 2018.
I am including my resume with this application:
Please check one: � Yes 0No
I would like to be considered for appointment to other advisory bodies for which I may be qualified.
Please check one: D Yes � No
THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT
Are you currently or have you ever been appointed to a Contra Costa County advisory board?
Please check one: ~ Yes O No
If Yes lease list the Contra Costa Count advisor board s on which ou are current! servin
If Yes, please list the Contra Costa County advisory board(s) on which you have previously served:
Hazardous Materials Commission
List any volunteer and community experience, including any boards on which you have served.
Martinez City Council (2002-present). Martinez Rotary Club member. Martinez Kiwanis Club member. League of
Women Voters member. League of California Cities Policy Committee member: Public Safety, Employee Relations.
Do you have a familial relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? (Please refer to the relationships
listed below or Resolution No. 2011/55).
Please check one: D Yes ~ No
If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: CA
Do you have any financial relationships with the county, such as grants, contracts, or other economic relationships?
Please check one: D Yes ~ No
If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship:
I CERTIFY that the statements made by me in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my
knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. I acknowledge and understand that all information in this
application is publicly accessible. I understand and agree that misstatements and/or ommissions of material fact may
cause forfeiture of my rights to serve on a board, committee, or commission in Contra Costa County.
Signed: LCfA-"'Cv Vel~ Date: 09/09/21
Submit this application to: ClerkofTheBoard@cob.cccounty.us OR Clerk of the Board
1025 Escobar Street, 1st Floor
Martinez, CA 94553
Questions about this application? Contact the Clerk of the Board at (925} 655-2000 or by email at
ClerkofTheBoard@cob.cccounty.us
Important Information
1. This application and any attachments you provide to it is a public document and is subject to the California Public Records Act (CA Government
Code §6250-6270).
2. All members of appointed bodies are required to take the advisory body training provided by Contra Costa County.
3. Members of certain boards, commissions, and committees may be required to: 1) file a Statement of Economic Interest Form also known as a
Form 700, and 2) complete the State Ethics Training Course as required by AB 1234.
4. Meetings may be held in various locations and some locations may not be accessible by public transportation.
5 . Meeting dates and times are subject to change and may occur up to two (2) days per month.
6. Some boards, committees, or commissions may assign members to subcommittees or work groups which may require an additional
commitment of time.
7. A s indicated in Board Resolution 2011/55, a person will not be eligible for appointment if he/she is related to a Board of Supervisors member in
any of the following relationships: mother, father, son, daughter, brother, sister, grandmother, grandfather, grandson, granddaughter, great-
grandfather, great-grandmother, aunt, uncle, nephew, niece, great-grandson, great-granddaughter, first-cousin, husband, wife, father-in-law,
mother-in-law, daughter-in-law, stepson, stepdaughter, sister-in-law, brother-in-law, spouse's grandmother, spouse's grandfather, spouse's
granddaughter, and spouses' grandson, registered domestic partner, relatives of a registered domestic partner as listed above.
8 . A person will not be eligible t o serve if the person shares a financial interest as defined in Government Code §87103 with a Board of Supervisors
Member.
THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT
EDUCATION LARA E. DELANEY ■University of Chicago, Harris Graduate School of Public Policy, M.A. 1993■University of California Santa Cruz, Honors B.A., Literature, 1989EXPERIENCE City of Martinez Councilmember, Vice Mayor (rotated)
December 2002 -present ■Initiated the successful Measure D Transportation Sales Tax, November 2016 ballot.■Initiated the Community Preservation Ordinance and Administrative Citation process.■Initiated the Economic Stimulus Program; Redevelopment Feasibility Study; Second-Hand SmokingOrdinance; Plastic Bag Ban.■Chamber of Commerce liaison; East Bay League of California Cities representative; Member of FinanceCommittee, Franchise Committee, Annexation Committee, Climate Change Committee, RedevelopmentCommittee, Infrastructure Committee, Marina Committee.■League of California Cities "Employee Relations Committee" member 2010-2014; League"Environmental Quality Committee" member 2008, 2009. Public Safety Committee member 2020.Contra Costa County Oct. 1998 -present
Senior Deputy County Administrator, County Administrator's Office
■Director, Office of Reentr.y & Justice (2013-present): Development of Community Programs forprovision of reentry employment, housing, mentoring services and oversight of Reentry System.■Contra Costa County Legislative Coordinator (2007-present): Legislation Committee staff, liaison withfederal and state delegation, lobbyists, County Department Heads and key staff, Board of Supervisors.■Advisory Body Liaison: Policy development, training, and over-sight of County advisory body operations.■Budget Analyst (1998-2007): Budget development, analysis, monitoring, and projections for generalgovernment and social service departments.■Policy development and legislation monitoring: administrative bulletins, purchasing policy development,property tax sharing policy, State budget impacts.■Annexation agreements, redevelopment plan fiscal impact analyses, subordination agreement analyses.■Special Projects: Delta Water Team member, GIS Policy Committee, Buchanan Airport Re-use Proposal,Purchasing Guide development, Advisory Body Handbook development, City of Oakley incorporation,Franchise Fee administration, Finance Committee staff, Department Performance Audits, Illegal DumpingCommittee.San Joaquin Council of Governments Senior Regional Planner
Sept. 1993 -Oct. 1998
■Measure K Transportation Sales Tax Administration: Strategic Plan development, Financial Plan revision,policy and procedure development for fund programming and implementation.■Project management of federally-funded transportation projects: allocation of funding, contractadministration, status reports.■Airport Land Use Commission staff.■Public participation program development and implementation: Citizens Advisory Committee staffliaison, committee and Board presentations, prepared Measure K Annual Reports.
PERSONAL
• Member of: Martinez Rotary Club, Diablo Valley League of Women Voters,
A.A.U.W., Kiwanis Club of Martinez, Main Street Martinez, Martinez Historical
Society.
• Former USPTA certified tennis professional.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Approve the new medical staff appointments and reappointments, additional privileges, advancements, and
voluntary resignations as recommend by the Medical Staff Executive Committee, at their August 16, 2021,
meeting, and by the Health Services Director.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact for this action.
BACKGROUND:
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has requested that evidence of Board
of Supervisors approval for each Medical Staff member will be placed in his or her Credentials File. The
above recommendations for appointment/reappointment were reviewed by the Credentials Committee and
approved by the Medical Executive Committee.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this action is not approved, the Contra Costa Regional Medical and Contra Costa Health Centers' medical
staff would not be appropriately credentialed and not be in compliance with The Joint Commission on
Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Sharron Mackey,
925-313-6104
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Terri Bostick, Marcy Wilhelm
C. 21
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Medical Staff Appointments and Reappointments – August 16, 2021
ATTACHMENTS
August list
Anna M. Roth, R.N., M.S., M.P.H.Contra Costa Regional
Health Services Director Medical Center
& Health Centers
Samir B. Shah, M.D., F.A.C.S.2500 Alhambra Avenue
Chief Executive Officer Martinez, California 94553-3156
Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Ph 925-370-5000
and Health Centers
& Chief Medical Officer
Contra Costa Health Services
A.New Medical Staff Members
Ajuria, Michael, MD Internal Medicine
Bhela, Serena, MD Internal Medicine
Carter, Rebecca, MD Pediatrics
Cho, Samuel Internal Medicine
Gunda, Sateesh, MD Psychiarty/Psychology
Hill, Alexandra, MD Emergency Medicine
Im, Jennifer, MD Internal Medicine/Pulmonary
Milne-Price, Ryann Emergency Medicine
Rust, Megan MD Pathology
Scott, Paris, MD OB/GYN
Tafoya, Chelesa,MD Emergency Medicine
Tafoya, Matthew, MD Emergency Medicine
Tran, Duy Vu, MD Psychiarty/Psychology
Tu, Mark, MD Diagnostic Imaging
Yeon, Sangjun, FNP DFAM-Detention
Zaman, Warda, DO Internal Medicine
B. Applications: Lifelong Residents (Family Medicine)
Dragonanovich,Hannah,DO
C.Requests for Department Change
Kuruvilla, Pramita, MD Hospital Medicine
Suchow, David, MD Emergency Medicine
D.Biennial Reappointments
Beach, Courtney, MD Hospital Medicine A
Brody, David, MD Hospital Medicine A
Buckley, Robert, MD Surgery A
Chou, Cinnie, MD DFAM A
Cremin, Daniel, MD DFAM A
Ding, Ningyuan, MD Hospital Medicine A
Dooley, Diane, MD Pediatrics C
Garcia, Darleen, DDS Dental A
Hans, Nitu, PHD Psychiatry/Psychology C
Hofstadler, Guenter, MD Pediatrics A
Holsenbeck, Linton, MD Psychiatry/Psychology C
Hyler, Bryan, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A
Kishan, Sunil, MD Psychiatry/Psychology C
Kuruvilla, Pramita, MD Hospital Medicine A
Levin, Sara, MD DFAM A
Liebig, Robert, MD Diagnostic Imaging A
Nguyen, Michael, MD DFAM A
Pandurangi, Maya, DO DFAM A
Perlroth, Joshua, MD Internal Medicine C
Ponder, Kathryn, MD Pediatrics C
Rael, James, MD Internal Medicine A
Rice, Abraham, MD Pediatrics A
Rostkowski, John, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A
Sorokin, Jeffrey, MD DFAM A
Stanziale, Jennifer, MD Hospital Medicine A
Sullivan, Gabriela, MD Internal Medicine A
Tzvieli, Ori, MD DFAM A
Ubhayakar, Kiran, MD Internal Medicine C
Watkins, Melanie, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A
Wondolowski, Lauren, MD DFAM A
Young, Howard, MD Diagnostic Imaging C
E. Biennial Reappointments for Teleradiologists (vRad)Biennial Renewal of Privileges
Groode, Tamra, NP Pediatrics AFF
Peterson, Wendy, NP Internal Medicine AFF
F.Biennial Reappointment for Teleradiologist (vRad)
Hecht, Adam, MD Diagnostic Imaging
Staib, Neil, MD Diagnostic Imaging
G Voluntary Resignations
Ahmad, Samir, MD DFAM
Hartung, Claire, MD DFAM
McIlroy, Richard, MD DFAM
Piccinati, David, MD Emergency Medicine
Plambeck, Katherine, Psy.D Psychiatry/Psychology
Romero-Duran, Adolfo, MD DFAM
Selvin, Jessica, Psy.D Psychiatry/Psychology
Sethi, Parminder, MD Surgery
Shah, Naman, MD Emergency Medicine
Streett, Robert, MD Psychiatry/Psychology
Gandhi, Shailesh Psychiatry/Psychology
RECOMMENDATION(S):
DECLARE vacant the District 3 seat on the Arts and Culture Commission, previously held by Grant Taylor
due to resignation, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor
Diane Burgis.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
Mr. Taylor notified the District Office on September 27, 2021 of his resignation from the Arts and Culture
Commission.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
District 3 would be unable to fill the vacant seat.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Lea Castleberry
925-252-4500
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 22
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:VACANCY ON THE ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION
AGENDA
ATTACHMENTS
MINUTES
ATTACHMENTS
Vacancy Notice
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25701 to reclassify two (2) Disability Benefits Coordinator
(VATC) (represented) positions, position #18257 (vacant), and position #12183 and its incumbent, from
salary plan and grade level ZB5-1631 ($6,812 - $8,280) to Departmental Human Resources Analyst II
(ARTA) (unrepresented) at salary plan and grade level B85 1631 ($7,079 - $9,487) in the Health Services
Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This request has an annual cost increase of approximately $78,506 with pension costs of $10,898 already
included. It is funded entirely by Hospital Enterprise Fund I.
BACKGROUND:
The classification of Disability Benefits Coordinator was established in 2003 as a single position allocated
to the Health Services Department. The position is responsible for overseeing the Leaves of Absence,
Family Medical Leave, Americans With Disabilities Act and modified duty assignments, reviewing
worker's compensation claims to ensure timely case management, and acting as the liaison to the County's
Risk Management. As the largest department, the caseload
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Jo-Anne Linares, (925)
957-5240
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Jo-Anne Linares, Sylvia Wong-Tam
C. 23
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Reclassify two Disability Benefit Coordinator positions in the Health Services Department
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
is consistently heavy, from 700-1400 cases at all times, which cannot be sustained with just one position.
The Department recently added another position to support this function. However, other departments
utilize the classification of Departmental Human Resources Analyst II in this same role.
Multiple desk audits were completed by the Human Resources Department from May 2021 through
August 2021 to analyze both the Disability Benefits Coordinator and the Departmental Human
Resources Analyst II classifications. The duties performed by the Disability Benefits Coordinator align
with those of the Departmental Human Resources Analyst II. Departmental Human Resources Analysts
can work in a generalist or specialized capacity, depending on the needs and the size of the department.
Departmental Human Resources Analysts, who are generalists, typically spend 30% – 70% of their time
on Leave Administration duties. Within the Employment and Human Services Department, a
Departmental Human Resources Analyst II specializes in Leave Administration and spends 100% of
their time devoted to the associated tasks. Based on the information in the PDQ and the desk audits, HR
recommends the positions be reclassified to a Departmental Human Resources Analyst II. This will align
the Health Services Department with the rest of the County, create parity, and assist in retaining
qualified staff.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this action is not approved, the Department will not be able to retain qualified staff or recruit qualified
candidates which will negatively impact the leave processing of approximately 5800 employees within
the Health Services Department.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
P300 No. 25701 HSD
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed P300 25701
POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
NO. 25701
DATE 3/8/2021
Department No./
Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0540 Org No. 6547 Agency No. A18
Action Requested: Reclassify Disability Benefits Coordinator (VATC) positions #18257 (vacant), and #12183 and its
incumbent to Departmental Human Resources Analyst II (ARTA) in the Health Services Department .
Proposed Effective Date: ___3/30/2021_
Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No
Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00
Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time):
Total annual cost $78,506.00 Net County Cost $0.00
Total this FY $26,168.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00
SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT: 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I
Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO.
Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments.
Jo-Anne Linares
______________________________________
(for) Department Head
REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Sarah Kennard for 3/8/2021
___________________________________ ________________
Deputy County Administrator Date
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 09/28/2021
Reclassify Disability Benefits Coordinator (VATC) position #18257 (vacant), and position #12183 and its incumbent to
Departmental Human Resources Analyst II (ARTA) in the Health Services Department .
Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule.
Effective: Day following Board Action.
8/1/2021(Date) Alycia Leach 09/28/2021
___________________________________ ________________
(for) Director of Human Resources Date
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 10/6/2021
Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza
Other: ___________________________________
(for) County Administrator
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator
DATE BY
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT
POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION
Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows:
P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01
REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS
Department Date No. xxxxxx
1. Project Positions Requested:
2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s)
3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds)
4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date
Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain.
5. Project Annual Cost
a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s :
(services, supplies, equipment, etc.)
c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund:
6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of:
a. potential future costs d. political implications
b. legal implications e. organizational implications
c . financial implications
7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these
alternatives were not chosen.
8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the
halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will
forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted
9. How will the project position(s) be filled?
a. Competitive examination(s)
b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)?
c. Direct appointment of:
1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job
2. Non-County employee
Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2
USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25815 to reassign one (1) Supervising Accountant (SAHJ)
position #13314 at salary plan and grade ZA5-1703 ($7,316 - $8,892), and its incumbent, from Department
0540 (cost center 6567 - General Accounting) to Department 0450 (cost center 5761 - Public Health
Administration); and reassign one (1) vacant Health Services Accountant (VCTB) position #14116 at salary
plan and grade ZB-1804 ($8,085 - $9,827) from Department 0450 (cost center 5761 - Public Health
Administration) to Department 0540 (cost center 6567 - General Accounting) in the Finance division of the
Health Services Department. (Represented)
FISCAL IMPACT:
This action will result in a cost savings of approximately $17,068, including $6,619 in pension costs, for the
Public Health Administration finance unit; this cost will be absorbed by the General Accounting unit.
(Hospital Enterprise Fund I)
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Sherry Martija, (925)
957-5480
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Sherry Martija, Jo-Anne Linares
C. 24
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Reassign One Supervising Accountant position and One Health Services Accountant position in the Health Services
Department
BACKGROUND:
The Public Health Finance unit is currently being restructured and management determined the need for
a Supervising Accountant moving forward. Position #13314 was housed in General Accounting
(department 0540, org code 6567) and was vacant at the time of this determination -- since then, it has
been filled and the incumbent has been assigned to oversee the Public Health Finance unit in order to
meet the needs of the restructuring. This request is to reassign the position and its incumbent to the
Public Health Finance unit (department 0450, org code 5761) to properly reflect the expense with the
appropriate cost center. To offset the cost of reassigning this position, one vacant Health Services
Accountant position will be reassigned from the Public Health Finance unit to the General Accounting
unit.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this action is not approved, this will result in the continuance of the position being funded by a cost
center/unit that the position does not reside in, nor where it is financially supported.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
P300 No. 25815 HSD
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed P300 25815
POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
NO. 25815
DATE 9/24/2021
Department No./
Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0450 Org No. 5761 Agency No. A18
Action Requested: Reassign one (1) Supervising Accountant (SAHJ) position #13314 and its incumbent , from Department
0540 (cost center 6567 - General Accounting) to Department 0450 (cost center 5761 - Public Health Admin); and reassign
one (1) Health Services Accountant (VCTB) from Department 0450 (cost center 5761 - Public Health Admin) to Department
0540 (cos t center 6567 - General Accounting) in Health Services. (Represented)
Proposed Effective Date: 10/13/2021
Classification Questionnaire attached: Y es No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No
Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00
Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time):
Total annual cost $17,067.55 Net County Cost $0.00
Total this FY $12,800.66 N.C.C. this FY $0.00
SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Cost will be funded by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues
Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO.
Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments.
Lauren Ludwig
______________________________________
(for) Department Head
REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Kaitlyn Jeffus for 10/5/2021
___________________________________ ________________
Deputy County Admini strator Date
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE
Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority
Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule.
Effective: Day following Board Action.
(Date)
___________________________________ ________________
(for) Director of Human Resources Date
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 10/6/2021
Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza
Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________
(for) County Administrator
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator
DATE BY
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT
POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION
Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows:
P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01
REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS
Department Date No.
1. Project Positions Requested:
2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s)
3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds)
4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date
Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain.
5. Project Annual Cost
a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs:
(services, supplies, equipment, etc.)
c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund:
6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of:
a. potential future costs d. political implications
b. legal implications e. organizational implications
c. financial implications
7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these
alternatives were not chosen.
8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the
halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will
forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted
9. How will the project position(s) be filled?
a. Competitive examination(s)
b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)?
c. Direct appointment of:
1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job
2. Non-County employee
Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2
USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25808 to add one (1) Probation Supervisor I (7AHA)
(represented) position at Salary Plan and Grade VK5 1712 ($8,365.63 - $10,168.47) and three (3) Deputy
Probation Officer III (7ATA) (represented) positions at Salary Plan and Grade VP5 1574 ($6,846.37 -
$8,321.80) in the Probation Department.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The annual fiscal impact is approximately $899,969 which constitutes the total compensation package
(salary and benefits) for these four positions. Of this amount, the County's pension cost is approximately
$349,293. The fiscal impact will be covered by Pretrial Release Program Funding (100% State).
BACKGROUND:
The Governor's 2021-22 Budget provides $140 million in one-time funding and $70 million in ongoing
funding to the Judicial Council for costs associated with pre-trial release programs. Each court may retain
up to 30 percent of the funding with the balance going to Probation departments. Contra Costa County
Superior Court is expected to receive $2,972,504 in one-time funding and $1,624,651 in on-going funding.
Contra Costa Probation expects to receive $2,080,753
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Jeff Waters (925)
957-5386
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Sylvia Wong Tam, Jeff Waters
C. 25
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Esa Ehmen-Krause, County Probation Officer
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Add one (1) Probation Supervisor I (7AHA) (represented) position & three (3) Deputy Probation Officer III(7ATA)
(represented) in the Probation Dept.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
in one-time funding and $1,137,256 in on-going funding. Contra Costa Probation will use the funds to
expand existing pretrial programs.
The addition of these 4 positions will enhance Probation’s ability to provide reports to the Court in a
timely manner and broaden the number of eligible candidates to be release from a custodial setting back
into the community. Additionally, it will improve Probation’s ability to connect these individuals with
supportive community based services to potentially reduce their involvement in the justice system.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The Probation Department will not be able to enhance the Pre-Trial program and utilize new revenue.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
P300 No. 25808
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed P300 25808
POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
NO. 25808
DATE 9/16/21
Department No./
Department Probation Budget Unit No. 0308 Org No. 3047 Agency No. 30
Action Requested:
Add one (1) Probation Supervisor I (7AHA) (represented) position and three (3) Deputy Probation Officer III (7ATA)
(represented) positions in the Probation Department .
Proposed Effective Date: 10/5/2021
Classification Questionnaire att ached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No
Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00
Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time):
Total annual cost $899,969.00 Net County Cost $0.00
Total this FY $674,977.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00
SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT General Fund
Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO.
Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments.
Jeff Waters
______________________________________
(for) Department Head
REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASE D TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
SS for Paul Reyes 9/29/2021
___________________________________ ________________
Deputy County Administrator Date
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 9/29/2021
Add one (1) Probation Supervisor I (7AHA) position and three (3) Deputy Probation Officer III (7ATA) positions in the
Probation Department
Am end Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolut ions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule.
Effective: Day following Board Action.
(Dat e) Rebecca Martinez 9/29/2021
___________________________________ ________________
(for) Director of Human Resources Date
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 10/7/2021
Approve Rec ommendation of Director of Human Res ources
Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Paul Reyes
Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________
(for) County Administrator
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrat or
DATE BY
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT
POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION
Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows:
P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01
REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS
Department Date 10/7/2021 No. xxxxxx
1. Project Positions Requested:
2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s)
3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds)
4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date
Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain.
5. Project Annual Cost
a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s :
(services, supplies, equipment, etc.)
c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund:
6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of:
a. potential future costs d. political implications
b. legal implications e. organizational implications
c . financial implications
7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have consi dered. Indicate why these
alternatives were not chosen.
8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the
halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will
forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted
9. How will the projec t position(s) be filled?
a. Competitive examination(s)
b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)?
c. Direct appointment of:
1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job
2. Non-County employ ee
Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2
USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25813 to add one (1) Board of Supervisors-Assistant
Specialist (J994)(unrepresented) position at Salary Plan and Grade B85 1652 ($6,957.98-8,054.73) in the
Board of Supervisors' District I Office, effective October 13, 2021, and delete Board of
Supervisors-Assistant Specialist Position No. 2471, effective January 1, 2022.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Dependent upon hire step, approximate one-time General Fund cost of $30,000. (100% General Fund)
BACKGROUND:
The District I Office was recently notified of the pending retirement of one of the four (4) Board of
Supervisors-Assistant Specialists and the extended absense of another Specialist. It is essential that a
position be added so that this exempt classification can be filled during this crucial time period. The
addition of this additional position for approximately 2.5 months will provide support to the office during
the extended absence of one of the Specialists, while providing cross-training time with the retiree prior to
her leaving.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Lisa Driscoll (925)
655-2047
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Ann Elliott, Director of Human Resources
C. 26
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Adopt Personnel Resolution No. 25813 to temporarily Add an additional Board of Supervisor Assistant-Specialist to
the District I Board Office
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this action is not approved, the Operation of District I office will be severely impacted by lack of staff.
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Personnel Resolution No. 25813 - Add BOs Assistant-Specialist
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Signed P300 25813
POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST
NO. 25813
DATE 9/29/2021
Department No./
Department Board of Supervisors Budget Unit No. 0001 Org No. 1101 Agency No. 01
Action Requested: Add one (1) Board of Supervisors-Assistant Specialist (J994) position at Salary Plan and Grade B85 1652
($6,957.98-8,054.73) in the Board of Supervisors' District I Office, effective October 13, 2021; and delete Board of
Supervisors-Assistant Specialist Position No. 2471, effective January 1, 2022.
Proposed Effective Date: 10/13/2021
Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No
Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00
Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time):
Total annual cost $30,000.00 Net County Cost $30,000.00
Total this FY $30,000.00 N.C.C. this FY $30,000.00
SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT General Fund, one-time cost
Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO.
Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments.
John Gioia, District I Supervisor
______________________________________
(for) Department Head
REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT
Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director 9/29/2021
___________________________________ ________________
Deputy County Administrator Date
HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 9/29/2021
Add one (1) Board of Supervisors-Assistant Specialist (J994) position at Salary Plan and Grade B85 1652 ($6,957.98-
8,054.73) in the Board of Supervisors' District I Office, effective October 13, 2021; and delete Board of Supervisors-Assistant
Specialist Position No. 2471, effective January 1, 2022.
Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule.
Effective: Day following Board Action.
(Date) Amanda Monson 9/29/2021
___________________________________ ________________
(for) Director of Human Resources Date
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 9/30/2021
Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources
Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director
Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________
(for) County Administrator
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: Monica Nino, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator
DATE BY
APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT
POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION
Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows:
P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01
REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS
Department Date 9/30/2021 No. xxxxxx
1. Project Positions Requested:
2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s)
3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds)
4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date
Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain.
5. Project Annual Cost
a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs:
(services, supplies, equipment, etc.)
c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund:
6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of:
a. potential future costs d. political implications
b. legal implications e. organizational implications
c. financial implications
7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these
alternatives were not chosen.
8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the
halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will
forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted
9. How will the project position(s) be filled?
a. Competitive examination(s)
b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)?
c. Direct appointment of:
1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job
2. Non-County employee
Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2
USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept a Grant Award #28-962
with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration
(HRSA), to pay the County an amount not to exceed $3,355,250, for American Rescue Plan Act Funding for
Health Centers, for the period from April 1, 2021 through March 31, 2023.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Acceptance of the Grant Award will result in payment to the County of up to $3,355,250 in funding from
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services HRSA. No County match is required.
BACKGROUND:
The goal of this grant is to support COVID-19 efforts across the Health Services Department including
vaccine management and distribution, expanding access to enabling services and supporting primary care
services for homeless patients at the homeless shelter in East County. This funding will improve the
COVID-19 vaccine inventory management system, expand access to enabling services by supporting
eligibility workers to support Medi-Cal redeterminations workflows and ensure availability of primary
health care for homeless patients relocated due to COVID-19.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Ori Tzieli, M.D.,
925-608-5267
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc: Marcy Wilhelm
C. 27
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Grant Award #28-962 with the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
The delay in processing this Grant Award was due to the budget documents needing approval by both
the funder and the Health Care for the Homeless governing board prior to finalization of the Grant
Award.
Approval of new Grant Award #28-962 will allow funding to the County for the American Rescue Plan
Act, through March 31, 2023.
ATTACHMENTS
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to submit a final
application and accept grant funding in an amount not to exceed $500,000 from the United States Economic
Development Administration under the American Rescue Plan Act Build Back Better Regional Challenge
to implement elements of the Northern Waterfront Strategic Action Plan to assist with economic recovery
from COVID-19 business impacts.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Build Back Better Regional Challenge grant program has neither an allowed administrative cost
component nor a match requirement. The personnel costs to apply for and administer the grant (if
successful) will be absorbed by the Department of Conservation and Development.
BACKGROUND:
The United States Economic Development Administration (EDA) published a call for proposals under
multiple new grant programs intended to relieve the economic crisis caused by COVID-19. Department of
Conservation and Development staff reviewed the available programs, and recommends submitting a grant
application under the "Build Back Better Regional Challenge" program, which is geared to regional
approaches grounded in existing plans. The Northern Waterfront Strategic Action Plan (SAP), adopted by
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Sam Driggers,
925-655-2783
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C. 28
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Grant Submittal for U.S. Economic Development Administration American Rescue Plan Act Build Back Better
Regional Challenge in the Amount of $500,000
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
the Board in 2019, provides the existing framework, and staff proposes to submit a grant application that
pulls out selected projects from the SAP to implement with the assistance of the grant funding and
technical assistance. Proposals can request up to $500,000 in funding for this phase of the grant
program, which would be allocated toward the following projects, listed with their Action Item Numbers
from the adopted Strategic Action Plan:
Complete, up to date business and industry data reflecting post-pandemic conditions (Actions 1.1.1, 1.1.2,
3.1.1, and 5.1.3): $100,000
Conduct a Bioscience incubator feasibility study on County-owned land in Hercules (Action 4.1.1):
$100,000
Develop Regional Northern Waterfront target industry-oriented marketing materials including unified
website, branding, and collateral (Actions 5.1.1 and 5.1.2): $150,000
Advanced transportation technology cluster support at one or both of two sites in the Northern Waterfront
area: GoMentum Station (privately owned vehicle technology testing site) on the Concord Naval Weapons
Station and Buchanan Airport (publicly owned commercial airport with aviation technology space
available) (Actions 1.1.2 and 4.1.2): $150,000
These projects were chosen to provide balance across the county and the Northern Waterfront sub-areas,
and a mix of types of actions.
If this grant application is successful, the County would be well placed to apply for a second phase of
grant funding to continue implementation. Meanwhile, as part of a coalition coming together to support a
different, complementary grant application under the EDA's Good Jobs Challenge, further work
continues on multiple fronts to improve economic conditions and opportunities for County residents.
The Good Jobs Challenge application is not due until January 2022 so will come to the Board for
approval at a later date.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the Board does not approve this item, the County will not submit an EDA grant application for
$500,000 to improve economic conditions.
ATTACHMENTS
ARPA Grant Summary
CoCoCo Build Back Better Regional Challenge grant Draft Concept Paper v3
9.28.2021
Title:
Advanced Manufacturing as an Engine for Equity and Wealth Building along the Northern
Waterfront communities of Contra Costa County
Introduction:
The Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative TM is a regional cluster-based
economic development strategy with the goals of creating more good jobs closer to home for
residents, while revitalizing older industrial areas and reinvigorating legacy industries . The
Initiative leverages existing competitive advantages and assets by focusing on production in five
targeted clusters (Advanced Manufacturing, Biosciences, Agriscience & Specialty Foods,
Transportation Technolog ies , Clean Tech). The initiative is a collaboration be tween the County
and seven partner cities, who work together on diverse actions to enhance the economic vitality
of the region. The eight partners have signed a Memorandum of Understanding to implement
the Initiative as a team. The Initiative has been formalized in a Strategic Action Plan, adopted by
the County Board of Supervisors in 2019. This grant proposal implements the Strategic Action
Plan.
Rationale:
This Build Back Better Regional Challenge grant seeks to boost the opportunities for
disadvantaged communities and residents, particularly those disproportionately affected by the
COVID-19 pandemic, and the Northern Waterfront communities contain census tracts identified
as SB1000 communities and Opportunity Zones (previously designated areas of concern targeted
for investment). Building upon this multi-jurisdictionally approved framework, while
incorporating a pandemic recognition that we can do better, and utilizing commitments from
across the private-public and civic sectors , this grant will bring together additionally and timely
federal stimulus funding and a required stimulus council for the purposes of accelerating
development projects which tackle l ong -term economic distress , invest in racial justice and
equity in historically disadvantaged communities along the Northern Waterfront.
Organization:
The Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) is the planning and permitting agency
for unincorporated Contra Costa County, and serves a coordinating role for economic
development, affordable housing, and community investment countywide . DCD staff will serve
as the grant lead and primary point of contact.
Project Description:
Identify compelling industrial development projects within the footprint and econ omic
development framework of the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative TM. These
projects should have broad-base support, environmental and historical documents in hand, and
incorporate the ability to quickly galvanize the community around four tentpoles of: establish a
green economy, tackle climate change, advance racial equity, and restore our global
competitiveness.
CoCoCo Build Back Better Regional Challenge grant Draft Concept Paper v3
9.28.2021
The identified projects are taken from the existing, approved Strategic Action Plan (SAP), except
for the analytic data update – which the need is, of course, an outcome of the pandemic . The
SAP and Northern Waterfront MOU were completed in 2019, just before onset of the pandemic,
and have needed an influx of resources to regroup and reignite the partnership in the wake of
the changing business landscape.
The Build Back Better Regional Challenge grant will serve that catalyst role, directly serving
Objectives and Action Items in the SAP supporting three of the target industries: Bioscience,
Transportation Technologies, and Advanced Manufacturing. These three are deliberately
selected to be the targets for the B uild Back Better Regional Challenge grant because they are
the most in need of a boost coming out of pandemic conditions, and least resourced from other
funding streams.
Budget:
The total cost of Phase One of the Northern Waterfront Build Ba ck Better Regional Challenge
grant proposal is projected to be $500,000 for technical assistance in four areas , which will cover:
Complete, up to date business and industry data reflecting post -pandemic conditions
(Action 1.1.1, 1.1.2, 3.1.1., and 5.1.3): $100,000
Conduct a Bioscience incubator feasibility study on County-owned land in Hercules
(Action 4.1.1): $100,000
Develop Regional Northern Waterfront marketing materials including unified website,
branding, and collateral (Actions 5.1.1 and 5.1.2): $150,000
Advance transportation technology cluster support at one or both of two sites in the
Northern Waterfront area to foster an environment that can retain and attract this
cluster in future regional development: GoMentum Station (privately owned vehicle
technology testing site) on the Concord Naval Weapons Station (CNWS) and Buchanan
Airport (publicly owned commercial airport with aviation technology space available)
(Actions 1.1.2 and 4.1.2): $150,000
Summary:
Northern Waterfront Economic Development InitiativeTM is a private-public-civic sector led
initiative aimed at spurring bottom-up economic rejuvenation and revitalization focused on the
emerging industrial clusters of the future, while concentrating the tangible socio -economic
benefits for l ong -time residents of the communities along the 55-mile Northern Waterfront that
are experiencing disproportionate job loss, economic underinvestment, and excessive commute
times .
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with the City and
County of San Francisco, in an amount not to exceed $744,412 as part of the 2020 U.S. Department of
Homeland Security, Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant for homeland security related projects
within the County for the period November 1, 2020 through the end of the grant funding. (100% Federal)
FISCAL IMPACT:
No County Costs. $744,412; 100% 2020 Urban Area Security Initiative Grant from the City and County of
San Francisco acting as fiscal agent for the Bay Area Urban Area Security Initiative. (CFDA # 97.067)
BACKGROUND:
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security Urban Area Security Initiative Grant Program funds the unique
planning, equipment, training, and exercise needs of high threat, high density urban areas. This grant assists
designated regions in building an enhanced and sustainable capacity to prevent, protect against, respond to,
and recover from acts of terrorism. California is home to five of these urban areas and the U.S. Department
of Homeland Security designated the City
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Chrystine Robbins,
925-655-0008
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C. 29
To:Board of Supervisors
From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:2020 Urban Area Security Initiative Grant
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
and County of San Francisco as the fiscal agent for the Bay Area Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI).
The County, as a member of the Bay Area UASI, will receive $744,412. Funds will be used to enhance
public safety capabilities of law enforcement agencies throughout the region by aggregating discrete
criminal information sources into a unified platform. Without a regional system, there exists no active
solution for connecting data across jurisdictions. Expand existing systems to participate in other state,
regional, and national initiatives. Funding will also be used to: increase public awareness and understanding
of the Community Warning System in Contra Costa County and to increase registrations, both through the
CWS website and social media; to purchase Sheriff's protective vests and helmets; to purchase Health
Services Hazmat devices to aid in the detection/identification of chemicals to assist in protection, response
and mitigation during a terrorism attack; and to fund Moraga Orinda Fire District's comprehensive
evacuation support system consisting of: fire modeling, evacuation polygons, and evacuation decision
support tool. As the fiscal agent for the grant, the City and County of San Francisco has developed a
standard form contract for use with all Bay Area UASI partner agencies requiring full indemnification of
the City and County of San Francisco. The County has agreed to previous inter-agency agreements with the
City and County of San Francisco, which contained the same language, to participate in regional homeland
security efforts and access important Federal funding.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Should the Board decide not to approve entering into this agreement, the County will not receive its share of
the 2020 UASI Grant funds; risk management and planning to increase regional response capability will
need to be either funded through another source or not performed.
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
Speaker: Addie.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ADOPT Resolution No. 2021/329 authorizing the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to
apply for and execute a contract to accept State of California (State) Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG)
funds in an amount not to exceed $615,970 for eligible activities to assist homeless individuals and families
with services to regain permanent housing as approved by the State in accordance with all State ESG
Program requirements and other applicable rules and laws.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No General Fund impact. All funds are provided to the County on a formula basis through the State of
California. The State ESG funds are allocated to the State by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, and then distributed to eligible local Administrative Entities. Contra Costa County is an
eligible Administrative Entity. The estimated State ESG formula allocation to the County is $307,985;
however, additional funds may become available from disencumbered expired ESG contracts. Application
instructions from the State recommend listing an approved dollar amount that is at least double the formula
allocation, or $615,970, in order to receive additional funds if they become available. The attached table of
recommended State ESG allocations includes only the estimated amount. A portion of the funds are
reserved for program administration in the County's Department of Conservation and Development.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Jaclyn Tummings,
925-655-2886
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
C. 30
To:Board of Supervisors
From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:2021/22 State of California Emergency Solutions Grant Program Funds
BACKGROUND:
The State of California Department of Housing and Community Development allocates State
Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds to Continuum of Care (CoC) geographic areas. The CoC is a
program through which the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development strives to end
homelessness. The County’s Health, Housing and Homeless Services is the CoC lead agency and
manages the CoC for Contra Costa. The County Department of Conservation and Development (DCD)
is the Administrative Entity for the State ESG funds and is required to collaborate with the CoC. The
ESG Program provides funds to activities that (1) engage homeless individuals and families who are
living on the street, (2) improve the number and quality of emergency shelters for homeless individuals
and families, (3) help operate shelters, (4) provide essential services to shelter residents, (5) rapidly
re-house homeless individuals and families, and (6) prevent families/individuals from becoming
homeless.
To apply for an allocation of State ESG funds, the County Board of Supervisors must approve a
resolution authorizing and affirming the following: 1) that the funds will be used in a manner consistent
with all applicable laws, regulations and contracts regarding the ESG Program; 2) that the County will
receive ESG grant funds in an amount not to exceed $615,970; 3) that the ESG grant funds will be used
for eligible activities; and 4) that the DCD Director or designee are authorized to execute a Standard
Agreement for ESG funds and related documents. The Contra Costa Council on Homelessness (COH) is
appointed by the Board of Supervisors and serves as the County’s CoC executive council. It provides
advice and input on the operations of homeless services and program operations, establishes the local
process for applying for various programs, including ESG. Given that this year is the second year of the
two-year funding cycle, DCD staff consulted with the COH at its May 7, 2020 meeting to present the
2-year funding cycle recommendations. The attached spreadsheet provides the recommended amounts of
2021/22 State ESG funds to each respective service provider that was funded in the first year of the
2-year funding cycle. The County has participated in the State ESG Program since 2016.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The County will not be able to receive State ESG funds to support the County's CoC geographic area.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
Programs and activities funded with State ESG support one or more of the following children's
outcomes:
1. Children Ready for and Succeeding in School
2. Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood
3. Families that are Economically Self Sufficient
4. Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing
5. Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families
AGENDA ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 2021/329
2021-22 State (Fed) ESG Allocations
MINUTES ATTACHMENTS
Res 2021/329 signed
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board
Adopted this Resolution on 10/12/2021 by the following vote:
AYE:5
John Gioia
Candace Andersen
Diane Burgis
Karen Mitchoff
Federal D. Glover
NO:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
RECUSE:
Resolution No. 2021/329
A NECESSARY QUORUM AND MAJORITY OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ("APPLICANT") HEREBY CONSENT TO, ADOPT AND RATIFY THE FOLLOWING
RESOLUTIONS:
WHEREAS the State of California (the "State"), Department of Housing and Community Development ("Department") issued a
Notice of Funding Availability ("NOFA") for the Continuum of Care Allocation dated August 17, 2021 under the Emergency
Solutions Grants (ESG) Program (Program, or ESG Program); and
WHEREAS Applicant is an approved state ESG Administrative Entity;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
1. Applicant is an approved Applicant by their Continuum of Care under the Continuum of Care Allocation and is hereby
authorized and directed to receive an ESG grant, in an amount not to exceed $615,970 in accordance with all applicable rules and
laws.
2. The Department may approve funding allocations for the ESG Program, subject to the terms and conditions of the NOFA,
Program regulations, and the Standard Agreement. The Applicant acknowledges compliance with all state and federal public
participation requirements in the development of its applications.
3. If applicant receives a grant of ESG funds from the Department pursuant to the above referenced ESG NOFA, it represents and
certifies that it will use all such funds in a manner consistent and in compliance with all applicable state and federal statutes, rules,
regulations, and laws, including without limitation all rules and laws regarding the ESG Program, as well as any and all other
contracts Applicant may have with the Department.
4. The Applicant hereby authorizes and directs the Director-Department of Conservation and Development, or designee, to
execute and deliver all applications and act on the Applicant’s behalf in all matters pertaining to all such applications.
5. If an application is approved, the Director-Department of Conservation and Development, or designee, is authorized to enter
into, execute and deliver the grant agreement (i.e., Standard Agreement) and any and all subsequent amendments thereto with the
State of California for the purposes of the grant.
6. If an application is approved, the Director-Department of Conservation and Development, or designee, is authorized to sign
and submit Funds Requests and all required reporting forms and other documentation as may be required by the State of
California from time to time in connection with the grant.
Contact: Jaclyn Tummings, 925-655-2886
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Laura Cassell, Deputy
cc:
State Emergency Solutions Grant Program Staff Recommendations 2021/22
Applicant Name Project Name Project Objective/Description Core Activity CA-ESG
Requested
Emergency
Shelter
Street
Outreach
Rapid
Rehousing
Homeless
Prevention
HMIS
(max. 10% of
total award)
Admin.Total Award
(CA-ESG)
SHELTER, Inc.
1333 Willow Pass Rd #206
Concord, CA 94520
Rapid Rehousing &
Homeless Prevention
Program
Program rapidly re-houses homeless households and prevents homelessness for households at
immediate risk of homelessness.Services include case management and financial assistance
(e.g.,move-in costs,rental subsidies).Increased focus to increase the level of services to quickly
rapidly rehouse to a permanent home homeless households (e.g.housing search,more intensive
case management and increased rent assistance as needed).
Rapid Rehousing $114,041 $119,727 $7,830 $127,557
SHELTER, Inc.
1333 Willow Pass Rd #206
Concord, CA 94520
Mountain View Family
Emergency Shelter
Open 24 hours a day and 7 days a week, Mountain View Emergency Family Shelter is a year-round
emergency shelter serving homeless families with children. The program provides homeless
families with a safe place to sleep and meals in conjunction with critical on-site services such as
education, employment services and counseling aimed at developing stability and self-sufficiency.
Emergency Shelter
Service $33,000 $36,911 $36,911
Contra Costa County
Health Services
1350 Arnold Drive, Ste 202
Martinez, CA 94553
CCHS CORE
OUTREACH
PROGRAM
Health Services CORE Outreach Program will provide daytime outreach in small multidisciplinary
teams that will work collaboratively to engage and stabilize homeless individuals living outside and
deliver health and basic need services and aid in obtaining interim and permanent housing.
Street Outreach $65,062 $72,773 $72,773
STAND! For Families Free
of Violence
1410 Danzig Plaza
Concord, CA 94520
Emergency Shelter
STAND!’s Emergency Shelter can accommodate up to 24 adult survivors and their children who are
fleeing life threatening violent relationships for up to 3 months at no cost. As part of a continuum of
care at STAND!, the Shelter provides clients with access to comprehensive supportive services,
including food, clothing, social and legal advocacy, vocational assistance, child services, housing
referrals, and evidence-based counseling – transitioning clients toward independence.
Emergency Shelter
Service $24,000 $26,844 $26,844
Trinity Center
Walnut Creek
1924 Trinity Avenue
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Trinity Center
Emergency Day
Shelter
Trinity Center Walnut Creek proposes to continue and expand its successful Emergency Day
Shelter to meet the basic and recovery needs of homeless and very low-income persons. Our
accessible program engages homeless persons who are resistant to services and advocates for
their health, self-sufficiency, and permanent housing. By implementing an advocacy-oriented
approach with very low barriers to services, Trinity Center supports the transition from
homelessness to self-reliance.
Emergency Shelter
Service $31,500 $35,233 $35,233
Contra Costa County
Conservation & Dev. Dept.
30 Muir Road
Martinez, CA 94553
Program
Administration
General Program Administrative costs include staff adminisrative work, training, equipment, and
general operating expenses.Administration N/A $8,667 $8,667
$267,603 $98,988 $72,773 $119,727 $7,830 $0 $8,667 $307,985 Total
CA-ESG
Recommendation
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Librarian, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant in the
amount of $149,750 from the Bella Vista Foundation to provide resources towards an Early Literacy
Outreach program for the period November 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no County match required as a condition of the grant. However, in order to make the Early Literacy
Outreach program feasible, the Library will dedicate $173,301 annually in Library Funds for staffing and
administrative support.
BACKGROUND:
The Bella Vista Foundation was founded in 1992 to support literacy, healthy living and youth development
and empowerment. Based in San Francisco, previous grant recipients have been located primarily in San
Francisco and Marin counties. They are expanding their reach into other parts of the Bay Area, and invited
Contra Costa County Library to apply for funding.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Walt Beveridge
925-608-7730
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C. 31
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Alison McKee, County Librarian
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Bella Vista Foundation Grant
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
Receipt of this grant will allow the Library to place a priority on providing library services to children 0-5
years-old in impacted communities through an Early Literacy Outreach program. Grant funds will be used
to develop a formalized mobile unit that uses dedicated staff to make scheduled stops in areas consistent
with the County Library's "Lunch at the Library" summer program. To date, the Library has attempted to
provide these services in an informal fashion out of existing Library branches, but has lacked the branch
location staffing and resources to implement and offer a complete program. With a formalized, structured
mobile unit program, the Library seeks to take its services beyond the branch locations and into the
community.
Over the course of the three-year grant cycle, grant funds will be focused on one-time purchases, such as a
specially equipped vehicle, and operating supplies, such as educational kits and books to give away. Grant
funding will be supplemented with additional funds to provide dedicated staff to operate the program, in
addition to program marketing and graphics. While staff will continue to explore alternative funding
sources to cover the [program's supplemental costs, there is sufficient Library Fund balance available to
complete program funding for the three-year grant cycle. At the end of the grant cycle, the Library would
assess the program's effectiveness and determine next steps.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the proposal is not approved, the Library will have fewer opportunities to engage with young children and
their families located in impacted communities who are unable to utilize a physical library.
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
The Early Literacy Outreach program will meet all five community outcomes established in the Children's
Report Card. Research shows that early and positive experiences with books set the stage for a child's
success in learning to read. Additionally, literacy skills are a strong predictor of health and employment
status. Providing storytimes and crafts for young children will encourage regular exposure to reading and
books, thus improving the quality of life for children and families in impacted communities.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute an agreement with
the California Department of Food and Agriculture to reimburse the County an amount not to exceed
$35,244 to provide Light Brown Apple Moth quarantine response and regulatory enforcement activities for
the period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This agreement provides reimbursement for County expenses not to exceed $35,244 incurred during the
period July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. There is no county match or grant monies involved.
BACKGROUND:
The Light Brown Apple Moth (LBAM) was first detected in Contra Costa County in March 2007 and over
time the County has become generally infested. California Department of Food and Agriculture imposed
the LBAM Interior Quarantine, for the entirety of Contra Costa County. The United States Department of
Food and Agriculture issued a Federal Domestic Quarantine order regulating interstate travel of host
materials. This regulation requires all nurseries, green waste facilities, community gardens, harvest host
plants and commodities within the infested areas be issued quarantine compliance agreements and be
inspected every 30 days. The Department of Agriculture performs quarantine-related regulatory and
enforcement activities in the County.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Stephanna,
9256086600
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C. 33
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Matt Slattengren, Ag Commissioner/Weights & Measures Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Light Brown Apple Moth (Regulatory) Agreement
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If unapproved, the Department will be unable to meet State mandates and will not received budgeted
revenue. This would also negatively impact the County's nursery industry and growers as they would not
be able to meet the requirements to ship host material to non-infested areas outside the county.
ATTACHMENTS
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Defender, or designee, to execute a purchase order with Dell
Technologies in an amount not to exceed $216,461 for the purchase and maintenance of two (2) PowerEdge
R740XD servers.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This purchase is budgeted for FY 21/22, 100% General Fund.
BACKGROUND:
The Public Defenders Office's servers contain a variety of outdated technologies. The current servers
supporting the department's technology infrastructure lack manufacture support placing the department at
great risk of hardware failure. Replacing the outdated servers with a robust server host will increase backup
efficiency and in the event of a disaster decrease the time required to execute a disaster recovery plan.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the Public Defender's Office is unable to replace the existing outdated servers the department remains at
risk of hardware failure disabling the web based servers, databases, and file management systems required
to operate the department's computers.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: susan woodhouse
925-335-8031
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C. 34
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Ellen McDonnell, Interim Public Defender
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Defender, or designee, to execute a purchase order with Dell Technologies
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the
County Contract #23-704 with Agfa Healthcare Corporation, a corporation, in an amount not to exceed
$4,282,363, to provide imaging technology services to the Contra Costa Health Services Department
(HSD), for the period from October 5, 2021 through October 4, 2026.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this contract will result in expenditures of up to $4,282,363 over a five-year period and is
funded by 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues.
BACKGROUND:
This contract meets the needs of the County's patient population by providing a radiology imaging system.
Contra Costa Health Services (CCHS) Radiology Department provides, reads, interprets, and maintains
radiology exams for its patients. To deliver this care, CCHS' Radiology Department has been using the
Agfa IMPAX radiology imaging system since 2006 and upgraded
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Patrick Wilson,
925-335-8777
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C. 35
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #23-704 with Agfa Healthcare Corporation
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
the system in 2012. The system reached its end of useful life in December 2016 and needs replacing. In
2017, and 2018 CCHS conducted a search and evaluation of potential replacements for the outdated system.
In addition to considering upgrading Agfa's IMPAX radiology imaging system to the latest version, CCHS
also evaluated Fujifilm and Philips, Picture Archiving and Communications Systems (PACS). Of these
solutions, considered top tier, CCHS Radiologists chose Agfa's Enterprise Imaging Software system to
replace the existing radiology imaging system. Agfa Healthcare Corporation's Enterprise Imaging Software
services, including Agfa Patching and Endpoint Managed Services, will be used to assist CCHS in
delivering services such as radiology exams and breast imaging exams. Agfa's Radiology PACS will
benefit physicians, radiologists, and HSD clinics in the course of patient care. Under this contract, the
Radiology PACS replacement system will be implemented and includes Enterprise Imaging production
software, test licenses, third-party software, data migration, and hardware.
Under Contract #23-704, contractor will provide radiology imaging technology services for the period
October 5, 2021 through October 4, 2026.
The terms of the agreement obligate the County to indemnify AGFA for: (1) claims arising as a result of
County’s modification of the equipment or software; (2) taxes that are payable by County; and (3) County’s
use of the software in a manner not authorized by the agreement. AGFA’s liability to County for damages is
limited to the amount paid by County in the 12 month period preceding the claim, excluding claims for
personal injury, property damage and death.
County may terminate the agreement before its expiration for an uncured breach by AGFA, and in the event
County does not appropriate funds for the payment of a computerized radiology imaging system in any
fiscal year.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, CCHS’s radiology imaging system will continue to be at its end of useful
life and will not receive the needed upgrades and patches necessary to deliver efficient patient care.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the
County Contract #23-625-3 containing mutual indemnification with 3M Health Information Systems, Inc., a
corporation, in an amount not to exceed $296,277, for a hosted patient classification and claims software
system and support services, for Contra Costa Health Services for the period from October 5, 2021 through
October 4, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this contract will result in expenditures of up to $296,277 over a three-year period and is
funded by 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I.
BACKGROUND:
This contract meets the needs of the County’s patient population by providing a health information system
that includes annuity software for performing claims reviews and provider comparisons. 3M’s Grouper Plus
Content Services (GPCS) system includes GPCS All Patient Refined - Diagnosis Related Groups (APR
DRG) Grouper and Reimbursement California (CA) Medicaid, a classification system, will assist the
Contra Costa Health Plan to assign patients into meaningful groups necessary for claims reimbursement.
3M APR DRG’s classify patients based on clinical similarities and their use of hospital resources. 3M's
Grouper Plus Content Services
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Patrick Wilson,
925-335-8777
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C. 36
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #23-625-3 with 3M Health Information Systems, Inc.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
provides access to comprehensive grouping, editing, and reimbursement content, utilizing a modern
cloud-based service that leverages web services and cloud technology to provide this content securely. The
standardized implementation of this system allows for a solution for an increasingly complex and dynamic
regulatory and payment environment. 3M Health Information Systems, Inc., was given a sole-source
contract for these services.
This contract obligates the County to indemnify 3M from any claims or damages arising out of County’s
use of the deliverables produced by the software and system. This contract limits the direct damages the
County can recover from 3M to the amount paid by the County in the 12 months preceding any claim. The
County may terminate the contract for an uncured breach by 3M, and if the County fails to appropriate
funds for an electronic patient classification and claims software system.
Under Contract #23-625-3, the contractor will implement the new system and provide software license and
support services for the period October 5, 2021 through October 4, 2024.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved HSD unit will not implement this much needed health information system
that allows for the timely access of business-critical financial, compliance, and content needed for an
efficient medical billing and reimbursement process.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to advertise for bids for the 2021 On-Call Pump
Repair Services Contract(s) for pump repair and replacement services at various County facilities,
Countywide.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Facilities Maintenance Budget. (100% General Fund)
BACKGROUND:
The Public Works Department's Facilities Services division is responsible for maintenance of all fire
pumps, chilled water pumps, hot water pumps and sewage pumps at County facilities.
The Public Works Department is requesting authorization to advertise and conduct a formal solicitation for
on-call pump repair services. A Notice to Bidders would be placed in the Contra Costa Times and several
building exchanges in accordance with the Cost Accounting Policies and Procedures Manual of the
California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Kevin Lachapelle, (925)
313-7082
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C. 37
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:ADVERTISE for Bids for the 2021 On-Call Pump Repair Services Contract(s)
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
The Public Works Department intends to award at least one (1) but not more than two (2) contracts, total of
contracts not to exceed $300,000, to the lowest, responsive and responsible bidder(s). Each contract will
have a term of three (3) years with the option of two (2) one-year extensions, and will be used as needed
with no minimum amount that has to be spent.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the request to advertise is not approved, the Public Works Department will not be able to advertise for
pump repair services.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the
County Contract #74-474-8 with Macey Rosenthal, M.D., an individual, in an amount not to exceed
$209,664, to provide outpatient psychiatric care for adults with mental illness in Central County, for the
period from November 1, 2021 through October 31, 2022.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this contract will result in annual expenditures of up to $209,664 and will be funded by 100%
Mental Health Realignment revenues. (No rate increase)
BACKGROUND:
The Behavioral Health Division has been contracting with Macey Rosenthal, M.D., since November 1,
2014 to provide outpatient psychiatric care to mentally ill adults in Central Contra Costa County.
On September 8, 2020, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-474-7 with Macey Rosenthal,
M.D., in an amount not to exceed $209,664, for the provision of outpatient psychiatric services, including,
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D,
925-957-5212
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: marcy.wilham, Alaina Floyd
C. 38
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #74-474-8 with Macey Rosenthal, M.D.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
diagnosis, counseling, evaluation, medication management, and providing medical therapeutic treatment,
consultation and training in medical and therapeutic matters for adults in Central Contra Costa County for
the period November 1, 2020 through October 31, 2021.
Approval of Contract #74-474-8 will allow the contractor to continue providing outpatient psychiatric care
through October 31, 2022.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, the County’s clients will not have access to this contractor’s psychiatric
care services.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the
County Contract #77-406 with Oxygen Plus, a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $225,000, to provide
durable medical equipment (DME) services to Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members and County
recipients, for the period from November 1, 2021 through October 31, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $225,000 over a 3-year period and will
be funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II revenues. (No rate increase)
BACKGROUND:
CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized health care services including DME services and
supplies for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts
with the County. This contractor has been a part of the CCHP Provider Network for several years, formerly
under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with CCHP and was required to convert to a County
contract.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Sharron Mackey,
925-313-6104
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm
C. 39
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #77-406 with Oxygen Plus
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
Under Contract #77-406, contractor will provide DME services to CCHP members and County recipients
for the period November 1, 2021 through October 31, 2024.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, certain specialized health care services for CCHP members under the terms
of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contract with the County will not be provided.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the
County Contract #25-085-4 with Bay Area Community Services, Inc., a non-profit corporation, in an
amount not to exceed $318,751 to operate COVID-19 housing in Richmond for homeless individuals in
Contra Costa County, for the period from October 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $318,751 and will be funded by 100%
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (No rate increase)
BACKGROUND:
Under this contract, the contractor will operate COVID-19 isolation and non-isolation housing for homeless
individuals at the SureStay Plus Hotel by Best Western at 915 W. Cutting Blvd. in Richmond. The
contractor will provide staffing twenty-four (24) hours a day, seven (7) days a week which includes, but is
not limited to, the following services: coordinate admissions and exits, coordinate meal services, provide
onsite wellness checks and ensure individuals have their basic needs met with clothes, food, and hygiene
supplies.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Lavonna Martin,
925-608-6701
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm
C. 40
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #25-085-4 with Bay Area Community Services, Inc.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
On April 20, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #25-085-3 with Bay Area Community
Services, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $637,502 to operate COVID-19 isolation housing for homeless
individuals in Contra Costa County for the period from April 1, 2021 through September 30, 2021.
Approval of Contract #25-085-4 will allow the contractor to continue to provide COVID-19 housing though
December 31, 2021.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, the County’s homeless individuals will not receive additional housing
during the COVID-19 pandemic, further putting the community at risk.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment
with Matrix HG, Inc., effective August 1, 2021, to increase the payment limit by $3,000,000 to a new
payment limit of $5,000,000 to provide on-call plumbing maintenance and repair services at various County
facilities, with no change to the term of February 1, 2020 through January 31, 2023, Countywide.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Facilities Maintenance Budget. (100% General Fund)
BACKGROUND:
Facilities Services is responsible for the maintenance of all County sites and facilities. On-call plumbing
contracts are used for maintenance and repair services at County buildings which include but are not limited
to: maintenance services for sewage ejector tanks, septic tanks, and grease traps, repair services of drainage
systems, sewage systems, piped water systems, and other plumbing systems, repair or replacement of
plumbing fixtures, valves, flushometers, water lines, traps and reciprocating pumps.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Kevin Lachapelle, (925)
313-7082
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C. 41
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE Amendment No. 2 to the Contract with Matrix HG, Inc., a California Corporation,
Countywide
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
This amendment will be adding $3,000,000 to a new payment limit of $5,000,000. Most of the existing
funds have been utilized by three projects: 2101 Loveridge Road in Pittsburg, Module M work being
performed at the Martinez Detention Facility, and the Marsh Creek Detention Center. The increase is
needed to ensure the County has access to the contractor's services for for the duration of the contract term.
The increase in contract limit will be used as needed, with no minimum amount that must be used.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, plumbing services with Matrix HG, Inc., will be discontinued.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the
County Contract #27-282-8 with Inview Imaging Diagnostics, Inc., A Professional Medical Corporation, in
an amount not to exceed $4,500,000, to provide diagnostic imaging services to Contra Costa Health Plan
(CCHP) members and County recipients, for the period November 1, 2021 through October 31, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $4,500,000 over a 3-year period and
will be funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II revenues. (No rate increase)
BACKGROUND:
CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized diagnostic imaging health care services, including,
but not limited to: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computerized tomography (CT) services for its
members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Sharron Mackey,
925-313-6104
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Noel Garcia
C. 42
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #27-282-8 with Inview Imaging Diagnostics, Inc., A Professional Medical Corporation
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
Plan membership contracts with the County. This contractor has been a part of the CCHP Provider Network
since November of 2011, providing diagnostic imaging services.
On October 8, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-282-7 with Inview Imaging
Diagnostics, Inc., A Professional Medical Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 to provide
diagnostic imaging services to CCHP members and County recipients, for the period November 1, 2019
through October 31, 2021.
Approval of Contract #27-282-8 will allow the contractor to continue to provide diagnostic imaging
services through October 31, 2024.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, certain specialized health care services for CCHP members under the terms
of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contract with the County will not be provided.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the
County Contract #77-417 with North Coast Medical Supply, LLC (dba Advanced Diabetes Supply), a
corporation, in an amount not to exceed $300,000, to provide durable medical equipment (DME) services to
Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members and County recipients for the period November 1, 2021
through October 31, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This contract will result in contractual service expenditures of up to $300,000 over a 3-year period and will
be funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II revenues. (No rate increase)
BACKGROUND:
CCHP has an obligation to provide certain specialized health care services including DME services and
supplies for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts
with the County. This new contractor will be part of the CCHP Provider Network to provide DME services.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Sharron Mackey,
925-313-6104
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Noel Garcia, Marcy Wilhelm
C. 43
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract #77-417 with North Coast Medical Supply, LLC (dba Advanced Diabetes Supply)
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
Under Contract #77-417, the contractor will provide DME services to CCHP members and County
recipients for the period November 1, 2021 through October 31, 2024.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, certain specialized health care services for CCHP members under the terms
of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contract with the County will not be provided.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
RESCIND Board action of September 21, 2021 (C.50), which pertained to an amendment to a purchase
order with ASD Healthcare; and APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf
of the Health Services Department, an amendment to Purchase Order with ASD Healthcare to increase the
payment limit by $500,000 for a new payment limit of $795,000 for the purchase of Remdesivir for Contra
Costa Regional Medical Center patients with no change in the term of January 1, 2021 through December
31, 2021.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this purchase order amendment will result in $500,000 of additional annual expenditures and
will be funded by 100% of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) allocations.
BACKGROUND:
Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Pharmacy Department has been purchasing Remdesivir for the
treatment of COVID-19 patients at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center from ASD Healthcare. ASD
Healthcare is the only Federal Government authorized distributer.
On September 21, 2021, the Board of Supervisors
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Jaspreet Benepal,
925-370-5101
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Irene Segovia, Marcy Wilhelm
C. 44
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Rescind Prior Board Action pertaining to the Amendment to Purchase Order with ASD Healthcare
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
approved amendment to Purchase Order with ASD Healthcare to add $300,000, which was the incorrect
increase amount and was stated so due to an administrative error. The amount should have read to add
$500,000 to a new total payment limit of $795,000. Approval of the correction will allow CCRMC to
purchase enough Remdsivir for treatment of COVID-19 patients, through December 31, 2021.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, we will not be able to purchase Remdesivir which is needed for treating our
COVID-19 patients causing a negative impact in the health of our patients at CCRMC.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
RESCIND Board action of May 18, 2021 (C.50), which pertained to a purchase order with Thermo Fisher
Scientific, Inc.; and APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health
Services Department, a Purchase Order with Fisher Scientific, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $1,900,000
for the purchase of reagents and supplies including small equipment and Triage Brain Natriuretic Peptide
(BNP) tests for the clinical laboratories at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra
Costa Health Centers, for the period from May 1, 2021 through April 30, 2026.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Approval of this action will result in annual expenditures of up to $1,900,000 over a five-year period and
will be funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues.
BACKGROUND:
On May 18, 2021, the Board of Supervisors approved Board Order C.50 for a purchase order with Thermo
Fisher Scientific, Inc., in the amount of $1,900,000 for the purchase of reagents and supplies including
small equipment and Triage BNP tests for the clinical laboratories at the CCRMC and Contra Costa Health
Centers.
The
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Jaspreet Benepal,
925-370-5101
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Marilyn Bybee
C. 45
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Rescind prior Board Action pertaining to Purchase Order with Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
purpose of this board order is to correct an administrative error in the name of the vendor from Thermo
Fisher Scientific, Inc. to Fisher Scientific, LLC, and change the date termination date from April 30, 2024 to
April 30, 2026, as was intended by the Department and negotiated with the vendor.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If these actions are not approved, the incorrect Board action will stand and the department will not have
Board authorization for this agreement under the correct contractor's name and negotiated term.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Defender, or designee, to execute a Memorandum of
Understanding with National Legal Aid & Defender Association (NLADA) to define the responsibilities of
NLADA, as the Project Sponsor, and the the Public Defenders Office as the Project Host Site, including a
cost share payment not to exceed $5,000 for one (1) AmeriCorps VISTA member who will provide
performance measurement and data analysis services for the period of October 1, 2021 through December
1, 2022.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is a $5,000 Host Site cost share payment to NLADA by the Public Defenders Office (100% General
Fund).
BACKGROUND:
NLADA is the fiscal agent and administrator of a grant from the Corporation for National & Community
Service. This grant allows NLADA to assign one VISTA member to the Public Defenders Office. The
VISTA member, who will be recruited by the Public Defenders Office, will assist the office modernize its
approach to evidence based practices, data management, and community partnerships. This will include
analytics to track and measure outcomes in a variety of areas such as immigration, racial and ethnic
disparities, and connecting clients with substance abuse disorder treatment programs.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Joanne Sanchez
925-335-8065
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C. 46
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Ellen McDonnell, Interim Public Defender
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Memorandum of Understanding between the Public Defenders Office and National Legal Aid & Defender Association
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If unapproved, the Public Defenders Office will not be able to execute a Memorandum of Understanding
with NLADA, nor participate as a Project Host Site for the VISTA member program.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, on behalf of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection
District, to make a payment to the State of California Department of Health Care Services in an amount not
to exceed $1,232,363 for the Ground Emergency Medical Transportation Quality Assurance Fee for
ambulance transports provided by the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District in the months of January
through June (Quarters 1-2) of 2021.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The fiscal impact is revenue generating for the District due to the significant number of Medi-Cal
transports within the District’s ambulance operating area. Medi-Cal is the second highest payer type
(second to Medicare). The net revenue the District receives will be calculated by multiplying the $220.80
per transport uplift for Medi-Cal fee-for-service and Medi-Cal managed care transports less the $33.42
QAF the District is required to pay on all transports.
The net revenue estimate (uplift less QAF) for the District for FY 2020-21 is approximately $2 million
under the current funding and fee parameters.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Jackie Lorrekovich, Chief Admin
Svcs (925) 941-3300
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the
minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C. 47
To:Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Board of Directors
From:Lewis T. Broschard III, Chief, Contra Costa Fire Protection District
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:GEMT QAF Payment to California Department of Health Care Services CY 2021 Q1-2
BACKGROUND:
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) approved State Plan Amendment (SPA) 18-004
authorizing the Ground Emergency Medical Transportation (GEMT) / Quality Assurance Fee (QAF)
program in March 2019. QAF is an add-on fee used to increase Medi-Cal funding. Essentially,
emergency medical transportation providers in California must pay this fee on all transports, and in
return, providers receive an uplift that increases the Medi-Cal reimbursement base rate for Medi-Cal
fee-for-service and managed care recipients. The GEMT/QAF program increases the historic base rate
of Medi-Cal reimbursement by $220.80 per transport. The GEMT/QAF program, therefore, increases
the per transport reimbursement from the historic base rate of $118.20 to $339.00.
To fund this program, the State of California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) began
assessing all transport providers within the State of California a fee of $25.23 per transport effective
July 1, 2018. The fee was increased to $26.07 for FY 2019-20, to $32.30 for FY 2020-21, and to $33.42
for FY 2021-22. The current rate of $33.42 in effect for FY 2021-22 is assessed on ground emergency
medical transports with dates of service beginning January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021.
The District received the attached invoices from DHCS on September 28, 2021. The invoices are for the
period January, February, March 2021 (Quarter 1), for $609,112.92, and April, May, June 2021 (Quarter
2), for $623,249.58.
This request is for calendar year 2021 quarters 1 and 2 fees (for January-June 2021 transports). The
payment for Q1 is due on or before October 15, 2021 . State program representatives indicated there
would be no exceptions and late fees may be assessed by the State for payments not received by the due
date. Payments for Q2 are due November 1, 2021.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The QAF payment is mandatory for all providers (public and private) within the State. If not paid, the
State can assess late payment penalties and withhold provider payments for ambulance services
provided to Medi-Cal recipients.
ATTACHMENTS
2021 Q1 QAF Invoice
2021 Q2 QAF Invoice
State of California—Health and Human Services Agency
Department of Health Care Services
GAVIN NEWSOM MICHELLE BAASS
DIRECTOR GOVERNOR
Third Party Liability and Recovery Division, General Collection Section, MS 4720
P.O. Box 997425, Sacramento, CA 95899-7425
Ground Emergency Medical Transport (GEMT)
Quality Assurance Fee (QAF) – Quarterly Payment
Provider Invoice
Provider Information: Due Date:
Payment Details:
Year: ___________ QTR: _______
Invoice Number:
Amount Due: $_____________________
Fiscal Year Reporting Structure Account App Ref Service Location
Activity Program Alt Account Fund Project
9990
Emergency Transport Type: Quantity:
Medi-Cal Fee-for-Service
Medi-Cal Managed Care
Medicare
Other
Dual Medicare/Medi-Cal
Amount Due = Sum of Total Transports x QAF Rate ( )
= $
Payment Instructions:
1.Please use the invoice number provided above to pay via Electronic Funds
Transfer (http://dhcs.ca.gov/epay).
OR
2. Please submit this invoice and payment to:ATTN: GEMT QAFAccounting Section/Cashiers Unit, Mail Stop 11011501 Capitol AvenueP.O. Box 997415Sacramento, CA 95899-7415
2021-22 980 80005
3323
Name:
Provider Name:____________________
DHCS Account Number:
4260KB0B 4129200
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT
10/15/2021
GEM1316339609
2021 Q1
GEM10211721
609,112.92
566
3903
6207
5270
2280
609,112.92
$33.42
State of California—Health and Human Services Agency
Department of Health Care Services
GAVIN NEWSOM MICHELLE BAASS
DIRECTOR GOVERNOR
Third Party Liability and Recovery Division, General Collection Section, MS 4720
P.O. Box 997425, Sacramento, CA 95899-7425
Ground Emergency Medical Transport (GEMT)
Quality Assurance Fee (QAF) – Quarterly Payment
Provider Invoice
Provider Information: Due Date:
Payment Details:
Year: ___________ QTR: _______
Invoice Number:
Amount Due: $_____________________
Fiscal Year Reporting Structure Account App Ref Service Location
Activity Program Alt Account Fund Project
9990
Emergency Transport Type: Quantity:
Medi-Cal Fee-for-Service
Medi-Cal Managed Care
Medicare
Other
Dual Medicare/Medi-Cal
Amount Due = Sum of Total Transports x QAF Rate ( )
= $
Payment Instructions:
1.Please use the invoice number provided above to pay via Electronic Funds
Transfer (http://dhcs.ca.gov/epay).
OR
2. Please submit this invoice and payment to:ATTN: GEMT QAFAccounting Section/Cashiers Unit, Mail Stop 11011501 Capitol AvenueP.O. Box 997415Sacramento, CA 95899-7415
2021-22 980 80005
3323
Name:
Provider Name:____________________
DHCS Account Number:
4260KB0B 4129200
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT
11/1/2021
GEM1316339609
2021 Q2
GEM1121O06B
623,249.58
555
4079
6051
5572
2392
623,249.58
$33.42
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Fire Chief, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with FireStats,
LLC, to increase the payment limit from $90,000 to $151,200, and to extend the term from October 8, 2021
to September 30, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
An appropriation exists for this service in the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District’s adopted
budget.
BACKGROUND:
The Contra Costa County Fire Protection District (District) establishes performance measures via statistical
and geospatial analysis of its computer aided dispatch (CAD) data for fires, emergency medical services,
and other incident responses.
Contractor is a nationally recognized expert in the reporting of fire service data. Contractor provides a
proprietary business intelligence software application for the analysis and reporting of CAD data. This
includes providing support to appropriate District staff to ensure their proper use and understanding of the
tools. Contractor will also be available to work with District staff to provide individual and/or group
consulting services as needed. Contractor
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Lewis Broschard, Fire Chief
(925) 941-3300
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of
the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
C. 32
To:Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Board of Directors
From:Lewis T. Broschard III, Chief, Contra Costa Fire Protection District
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contract Amendment with FireStats, LLC for a Hosted Solution for Fire/EMS CAD Data
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
is hosting the CAD data and software on a third-party server. This results in a costs savings to the District
for avoided system implementation costs.
For the continuity and efficacy of data analysis and reporting, the District recommends a three year contract
extension.
The contract requires that the District defend and indemnify the contractor from any and all third-party
suits, claims or liabilities, including attorney fees, costs or expenses that are claimed to have occurred as a
result of the District’s negligence and not arising from any negligence or willful misconduct by contractor
in the performance of the contract.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
The District will not have the ability to properly analyze and accurately report performance data and
establish appropriate benchmark standards for incident response.
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE County Counsel or her designee to consent to potential conflicts of interest
that arise from Foley & Lardner LLP (Foley) providing legal services to the West Contra Costa Healthcare
District (District) in connection with a proposed refunding of the District's Series 2018 and Series 2019
bonds while continuing to represent the Piper Sandler & Co. (Piper), the party proposed to act as the
underwriter or placement in the proposed refunding.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
Foley & Lardner LLP (Foley) has been asked by the County's Health Services Department to represent the
West Contra Costa Healthcare District (District) in a proposed refunding of the District's Series 2018 and
Series 2019 bonds. Foley has been asked to provide general oversight of the proposed refunding. If the
proposed refunding goes forward, the District will be served by Quint and Thimmig in the role of bond
counsel and by Jennings, Strouss & Salmon in the role of disclosure counsel. The firm of G.L. Hicks
Financial, LLC will serve the District
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor
Contact: Kathleen M. Andrus, Deputy County
Counsel, (925) 655-2200
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the
minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Kathleen M. Andrus, Deputy County Counsel, Bud DeCesare, Health Services
C. 48
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Mary Ann Mason, County Counsel
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:CONSENT TO WAIVE CONFLICT OF FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
in the role of municipal advisor.
If the proposed refunding proceeds, the District is considering engaging the investment banking firm of
Piper Sandler & Co. (Piper) to act as either underwriter (i.e., to purchase or arrange for the purchase of
the new bonds) or as placement agent (i.e., to identify potential institutional investors and negotiate the
sale of the new bonds). If Piper serves as underwriter, the District and Piper will enter into a bond
purchase agreement. If Piper serves as placement agent, the District and Piper will enter into a placement
agreement.
Foley has an ongoing professional relationship with both the County and Piper. Foley primarily provides
specialized legal services to the County's Health Services Department. At the same time, Foley advises
Piper on various finance matters, all unrelated to Foley's proposed representation of the District in the
proposed refunding.
Attached is a letter from Foley that requests that the County consent to Foley's representation of the
District in the refunding while it continues to represent Piper in unrelated financial matters. The letter
identifies and addresses the relevant requirements of the California Rules of Professional Conduct,
which are set forth in Rule 1.7 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.
In the absence of the informed written consent of each client, the California Rules of Professional
Conduct prohibit an attorney from representing a client if there is a significant risk the lawyer's
representation of the client will be materially limited by the lawyer's responsibilities to or relationship
with another client, a former client or a third person, or by the lawyer's own interests. (Rule 1.7(b).)
Even when a significan risk requiring a lawyer to comply with Rule 1.7(b) is not present, a lawyer is
prohibited from representing a client without written disclosure of the relationship to the client where
the lawyer has, or knows that another lawyer in the lawyer's firm has, a legal, business, financial,
professional, or personal relationship with or responsibility to a party or witness in the same matter.
(Rule 1.7(c)(1).)
Staff for the Health Services Department have advised that they do not object to the potential conflicts
and recommend waiver.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Foley would not be able to represent the County in the refunding while continuing to represent Piper in
unrelated financial matters.
ATTACHMENTS
Conflict Waiver
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
555 CALIFORNIA STREET
SUITE 1700
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-1520
415.434.4484 TEL
415.434.4507 FAX
WWW.FOLEY.COM
WRITER’S DIRECT LINE
415.984.9804
mschieble@foley.com
CLIENT/MATTER NUMBER
115450-0127
AUSTIN
BOSTON
CHICAGO
DALLAS
DENVER
DETROIT
HOUSTON
JACKSONVILLE
LOS ANGELES
MADISON
MEXICO CITY
MIAMI
MILWAUKEE
NEW YORK
ORLANDO
SACRAMENTO
SAN DIEGO
SAN FRANCISCO
SILICON VALLEY
TALLAHASSEE
TAMPA
WASHINGTON, D.C.
BRUSSELS
TOKYO
4839-4884-4540.2
September 29, 2021
Via Email
Mary Ann McNett Mason
Contra Costa County Counsel
Office of County Counsel
1025 Escobar Street
Martinez, CA 94553-1223
Re: Representation of West Contra Costa Healthcare District;
Conflict Waiver Request
Dear Ms. Mason:
I am a partner in the law firm of Foley & Lardner LLP, and Pat Godley has asked if
we could represent West Contra Costa Healthcare District (the “District”) in connection with the
District’s proposed refunding of its Series 2018 and Series 2019 bonds (the “Matter”). It is currently
proposed that the investment banking firm of Piper Sandler & Co. (“Piper”) act as either underwriter
or placement agent of the refunding bondsla, and the District accordingly will enter into either a
Bond Purchase Agreement or Placement Agreement with Piper.
In opening a new matter for our potential representation of the District, a conflicts
check disclosed that our firm has represented and currently represents Piper on various finance
matters, all unrelated to our potential representation of the District. Our proposed representation of
the District therefore presents a conflict of interest.
We are writing to seek informed written consent for me to represent the District in the
Matter, pursuant to Rule 1.7 of the Rules of Professional Conduct (“RPC”) governing California
lawyers. There is no risk that my representation of the District will be limited by my firm’s
responsibilities to or relationship with Piper. RPC 1.7(b). No part of RPC 1.7(c) is applicable to this
request. Piper has already consented to our representation of the District in this matter. I believe I
will be able to provide competent and diligent representation to the District in the Matter, the
representation is not prohibited by law, and this representation does not involve the assertion of a
claim by one client against another client represented by my firm in the same litigation or other
proceeding before a tribunal. RPC 1.7(d)(1-3).
In requesting this consent, we assure you that, as part of granting the requested
consent: (1) the lawyers in our firm who are currently involved in the representation of Piper will be
September 29, 2021
Page 2
4839-4884-4540.2
screened from any and all information relating to the Matter, and will be prohibited from working on
the Matter or accessing physical and electronic files relating to the Matter, such screen to remain in
effect throughout the duration of the Matter; (2) we will not use confidential client information in
any way to either client’s disadvantage; and (3), while no litigation is expected in the Matter, if a
dispute were to arise between the District and/or County and Piper in the Matter, our firm would not
be able to represent either party with respect to such dispute (including but not limited to litigation,
arbitration, bankruptcy, alternative dispute resolution or other proceeding related to the dispute).
Your consent, however, would not prohibit our firm’s ongoing and future representation of Piper in
matters unrelated to the Matter.
In closing, we note that the District is also represented in the Matter as to legal issues
by the law firm of Quint and Thimming, which is serving as bond counsel, and as to financial issues
by G.L. Hicks Financial, LLC, a municipal advisory firm registered as such with the Municipal
Securities Rulemaking Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Please let me know if you have any questions in regard to these matters.
Very truly yours,
Mark T. Schieble
MTSC:
cc: Pat Godley
Kate Andrus
Agreed and accepted:
Mary Ann McNett Mason
County Counsel
By:_________________________
Title:__________________
Date:________________________
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT and APPROVE the 2021-22 Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD), Community
Services Bureau (CSB) Planning Calendar.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact.
BACKGROUND:
The Employment and Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau's (CSB) Planning
Calendar provides guidance and a timeline for critical events such as: reviews, audits, and reports that occur
within the year. The Planning Calendar ensures continuity within the program as well as throughout the
bureau. Included in the calendar are methods to ensure consultation and collaboration with the program’s
governing body, policy groups, and program staff. CSB has obtained approval from the Head Start Policy
Council on August 18, 2021.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
Without approval, Community Services Bureau (CSB) will not be able to ensure accurate consultation and
collaboration with the program’s governing body, policy groups, and program staff, ultimately hindering
the continuity of all programs within CSB.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: V. Kaplan, (925)
608-5052
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 49
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:2021-22 Employment and Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau Planning Calendar
ATTACHMENTS
2021-2022 CSB Planning
Calendar
2021-2022 CSB Planning Calendar
ACTIVITY ADD'L
SPONSOR(S)JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE
Plan for Head Start
Awareness Month
Head Start Awareness
Month
Acknowledgement
Plan for Community
Action Month
Attend BOS Meeting
for PD/PY Layoffs
Community Action
Month BOS
Proclamation
Meet with individual
Board members for
updates
FHS Committee
Presentation
Invite Board Members
to Centers for Week of
the Young Child
Board of Supervisors: Reports Monthly Report to
BOS/CAO
Communication: Staff Quarterly Staff
Newsletter
Quarterly Staff
Newsletter
Quarterly Staff
Newsletter
Quarterly Staff
Newsletter
Communication: Staff SAM Quarterly Report SAM Quarterly Report SAM Quarterly Report SAM Quarterly Report
Planning: Strategic Planning Revisit 2021 Proposed
Strategic Initiatives
Strategic Plan Updates
to Staff and PC
Finalize Strategic Plan,
Changes Including
Timeline, Outcomes,
and Measurements
Prepare Community
Assessment Updates
Narrative for
Continuation Grant
Submit Executive
Summary with HS/EHS
Continuation Grant
Finalize Community
Assessment
Prepare presentation
for PC, CSB teams, and
others as needed
Action: Present
Community
Assessment Executive
Summary Report for
PC, BOS, EOC, and
Staff
Planning Calendar
Host Meeting w/
Leads to brainstorm
ideas for Planning
calendar format
Request Planning
Calendar Updates
from Senior
Management leads
(As Assigned/Up-Date
assignments)
Leads Review and
Update Sections
Send to SAM for
Review by the 15th
Present Planning
Calendar to PC
Program Services
Subcommittee
Action: Request PC
approval of Planning
Calendar
Action: BOS Approval
Present Updates to
Staff
Policies & Procedures
Biennially; Addendums in 2021/2022
Distribute Hard Copies
to Centers/
Administrative Offices.
Post on the Intranet.
Conduct Annual Staff
Training on Service
Plans and P&P's
Check-In w/ SAM
regarding addendums
needed
Distribute
Assignments to Senior
Managers/CS
Managers Review
Team
Senior Managers/
Managers Send
Updates to the Analyst
Analyst Gets SAM
Approval
Enlist PC Sub-
Committee for
Review/Input to
Service Plans and
P&P's and Analyst to
Finalize and Gets Final
SAM Approval
Action: Submit to PC
and BOS for Approval
/Order Copies of
Approved P&P's for
Centers/Administratio
n and Post on CSB
Intranet
Recordkeeping & Reporting:
Annual Report Finalize Annual Report Annual Report Final
Approval from SAM
Present/Distribute
Annual Report to PC
and BOS/CAO
Disseminate/
Distribute Annual
Report to Public and
Staff
Begin Annual Report
Process and Gather
Content from Sr.
Mgrs. and CSMs
Recruit PC Self-
Assessment Sub-
Committee
Begin Self-Assessment
Process Planning
Form Self-Assessment
Teams for Review at
CSB and Delegate
Agency Sites
Identify Sites and
Classrooms for Self-
Assessment and
Instruments
Conduct Self-
Assessment
(CSB/FBHS)
Conduct Self-
Assessment
(CSB/FBHS)
Review Self-
Assessment Data &
complete SA report
Present Process to PC
and Broaden
Subcommittee
Membership
Train Community
Volunteers/PC
Subcommittee
Members
Develop Self-
Assessment Schedule
and Send Out
Notification
(August) Link any Self-
Assessment Findings
to G&O's for
Continuation Grant
and T & TA Plan
Aaron Alarcon- Bowen
Report Progress on CSB Strategic Plan
Board of Supervisors:
Communication
Amanda Cleveland
Community Assessment (Year 5)
2017-2022
Major Update Every 5 years
Researching Community Assessment Updates- Year 5
(Contractor- Diane Godard)
Self Assessment Activities
Self Assessment Activities (cont.)
Researching for Year 5 Community Narratives (survey(s) of community
members, community photos, etc.)
CSB Planning Calendar 2021-2022 1
2021-2022 CSB Planning Calendar
Action: (August)
Submit Final Report
and Obtain Approval
of Corrective Action
Plans as Necessary
(ACF/PC/BOS/CSB
Director)
Communication:
Families
Communication:
Families
Early Closure
Letter/Curriculum
Input Letter
Fall/Holiday Letters Year-end celebrations
Communication:
Staff
Monthly Cluster
meetings
Quarterly All Cluster
meetings
Quarterly All-Cluster
meetings
Quarterly All Cluster
meetings
Quarterly All Cluster
meetings
Annual County
Equipment Inventory
Report Confirmation
Program Year prior to
Last Program Year
Drop Files to
Warehouse for
Storage
Release Files Past
Destruction Date to
County for Shredding
Prior Program Year
Archived Files Stored
at Sites for One Year
Christina Reich
2021 CAP Annual
Convention-Boston,
MA
Sept 1-3
Quarterly CAC
Meeting
Quarterly CAC
Meeting
Quarterly CAC
Meeting
Quarterly CAC
Meeting
Monthly EOC Business
Meetings
Election of EOC
Executive Committee
Officers
2021-2022
Present the 2020
Board of Supervisors
Annual Report to EOC
Form 700 due to Clerk
of BOS
Community Action
Month: EOC Outreach
Event
Community Services Block Grant:
Subcontractors
EOC Members Begin
2021-22
Subcontractor Onsite
Monitoring
EOC RFI Process for
2022-23 CSBG Funding
Subcommittee to
Review CSBG
Proposals for 2022-
23Subcontractor
Contracts
2022-23 Awarded
Subcontractors and
CSBG Budget
presented to the EOC
Annual CSBG
Roundtable
20th: Bi-Monthly
Expenditure Due to
CSD (May & June)
20th: Bi-Monthly
Expenditure Due to
CSD (Jul & Aug)
Year-End Budget
Modification
Developed w/Fiscal
Subcommittee to CSD
20th: Bi-Monthly
Expenditure Due to
CSD (Sept & Oct)
20th: Bi-Monthly
Expenditure Due to
CSD (Nov & Dec 2021)
20th: Annual
Programmatic Reports
due to CSD
20th: Bi-Monthly
Expenditure Due to
CSD (Jan &Feb 2022)
20th: Bi-Monthly
Expenditure Due to
CSD (Mar & Apr)
15th: Last day to
Submit Budget
Modification to CSD (If
necessary)
1st: CSBG Information
System (IS) Report due
to CSD (Jan-Dec 2021)
31st: 2021-22 CSBG
Close Out Report Due
to CSD
Contracts:
CSBG
Begin Request for
Information (RFI) for
CSBG Contract w/ CSD
for PY 2022-23
RFI Information
session for potential
subcontractors
Begin executing 2022-
23 CSBG contracts
Amy Wells
Community Services Block Grant:
Reporting/Audits
Community Work Days (may be suspended or postponed due to
COVID-19)
Community Services Block Grant:
EOC Meetings/Events
Community Services Block Grant: CSD
Meetings and Trainings
Self Assessment Activities
Self Assessment Activities (cont.)
Carlos Ribeiro
Community Work Days (may be suspended or
postponed due to COVID-19)
Back to School Nights (may be suspended or postponed due to COVID-
19)
Recordkeeping & Reporting:
Equipment and Files
CSB Planning Calendar 2021-2022 2
2021-2022 CSB Planning Calendar
Eva Gaipa
Monthly Personnel
Tracking reports:
WC/FMLA/LOA
Performance Review –
every other month
Staff & Center Roster
Vacant/Filled Report
Ongoing Permit
expiration notices to
staff
Ongoing Personnel
File Monitoring
including partners
Performance
Review notices
Performance
Review notices
Performance
Review notices
Positions Control
Review
Performance
Review notices
Performance
Review notices
Performance
Review notices
Personnel Budget
review.
Return-To-Work Letter
to Laid off PD/PY staff
(August 1st)
PD/PY Employees
return
Action: Board Order to
Layoff PD/PY Staff
Action: PD/PY layoff
approval by PC
Order of Layoff PD/PY
Staff
Notice of Proposed
Action for Layoff
Summer closure &
PD/PY Staff Layoff
Notice of Action for
Layoff
Reporting Program Information
Report LIC 500 to Licensing LIC 500 to Licensing
Risk Management Loss
Control Report - Share
w/Senior Mgmt.
LIC 500 to Licensing LIC 500 to Licensing
Required Training
Ongoing Sexual
Harassment
Awareness Training
(line staff every 3
years and supervisor
every 2 years)
National Voter
Registration Act
Training (Annually
July/Aug.)
CSB Policies and
Procedures Review by
all staff
Chronological
Supervision &
Progressive Discipline
Training
Civil Rights Training
(Every 2 years
Jan./Feb.)
CSB Protocol for
Hourly Head Count
and Transition training
for staff
Preventive Health &
Safety (EMSA) (At time
of hire once or twice
per year)
Child Abuse &
Domestic Violence
Awareness Training-At
time of hire and after
every 2 years
Confidentiality
Training (Annually
Apr./May)
Illness and Injury
Prevention plan
Review
Labor Local 1 presentation
at NEO (monthly)
Labor -Management
Meeting
Labor -Management
Meeting
Meet & Confer Layoff
PD/PY Staff
Warning Letter to
Layoff PD/PY staff
Labor -Management
Meeting Annual Bid Labor -Management
Meeting
Ongoing recruitment
at One-Stops and
Community Fairs
Career Intro Career
Fair
Outreach fair at
Loma Vista
Adult Center
Recruitment CCC, DVC
& Los Medanos
College job fair
Recruitment DVC
Recruitment Solano
Community College
job fair
Career Intro Career
Fair (May)
Mills College Tabling
Career Event
Pittsburg CofC &
Pittsburg USD
CareerLink Fair
Career Intro Career
Fair
Mount Diablo USD
Career Fair
West Bay USD Career
Fair (being
researched)
Nancy Benavides
Federal Reports Fiscal Team
Budget Input in HSES
Due to ACF for Next
Program Year
County Single Audit
begins
Head Start & Early
Head Start Fiscal Year
Begins
Baseline Budget (BFM)
and Budget Narrative
Due
County Performance
Report Due
Report the Results of
Prior Year Single Audit
to PC
Fiscal Team Fiscal Reports to PC &
BOS every month
Fiscal Reports to PC &
BOS every month
Fiscal Reports to PC &
BOS every month
Fiscal Reports to PC &
BOS every month
Fiscal Reports to PC &
BOS every month
Fiscal Reports to PC &
BOS every month
Fiscal Reports to PC &
BOS every month
Fiscal Reports to PC &
BOS every month
Fiscal Reports to PC &
BOS every month
Fiscal Reports to PC &
BOS every month
Fiscal Reports to PC &
BOS every month
Fiscal Reports to PC &
BOS every month
Fiscal Team
County Year-End Close-
Out Continues:
Submission of
Journals, Accruals,
and Deferrals to
Auditor's Office
Complete Risk
Assessment for Each
Subrecipient
Single Audit
Certification of
Subrecipients
Cut-off for
Encumbrance of
HS/EHS Funds
Personnel Cost
Forecasting (PCF)
Report due
Site Review of
Delegate Agency Due
Recruitment
PD/PY
Tracking
Monitoring
CSB Planning Calendar 2021-2022 3
2021-2022 CSB Planning Calendar
Federal Reports (cont.)Fiscal Team
SF-425 Semi-Annual
Financial Status
Report Due to ACF
Finalize 2021
Operational and T &
TA Budget for HS/EHS;
2021 Budget for PC
Discussion and
Approval
SF-425 Annual
Financial Status
Report and SF-429
Real property Status
Report Due to ACF
SF-425 Final Financial
Status Report Due to
ACF
Internal Control
Checklist on Cash and
Petty Cash due to
Auditor's Office
Fiscal Team
County Year-End Close-
Out Begins: Cut Off for
Encumbrances
Adjustment Deposit
Permit
Operating Information
in the Comprehensive
Annual Financial
Schedule of
Expenditures of
Federal Awards Due to
Auditor Controller's
Office
SF-425 Annual report
for CCP2 due to ACF
SF-429 Real Property
Status report due to
ACF
Current Year's Budget
Adjustments Due to
Auditor Controller's
Office
Mandatory &
Discretionary List to
CAO
Subrecipient &
Contractor
Determination
Checklist
Michael
CSBG Report Due to
CSD (bi-monthly due
on the 20th)
CSBG Report Due to
CSD (bi-monthly due
on the 20th)
CSBG Report Due to
CSD (bi-monthly due
on the 20th)
Mid-year Projections
Due to CAO
CSBG Report Due to
CSD (bi-monthly due
on the 20th)
CSBG IS Form
Due 3/1
CSBG Report Due to
CSD (bi-monthly due
on the 20th)
CSBG Report Due to
CSD (bi-monthly due
on the 20th)
State Reports Fiscal Team State/County Fiscal
Year Begins July 1st
County Year-End Close-
Out Continues:
Submission of
Journals, Accruals,
and Deferrals to
Auditor's Office
Current Year's Budget
Adjustments Due to
Auditor Controller's
Office
Mandatory &
Discretionary List to
CAO
State/County Fiscal
Year Ends June 30th
Komal CDE 4th Quarterly
Report Due
CDE 1st Quarterly
Report Due
CDE 2nd Quarterly
Report Due
CDE 3rd Quarterly
Report Due
Komal
4th qtr QRIS report to
Contra Costa County
Office of Education
(CCCOE)
1st qtr QRIS report
CCCOE
2nd qtr QRIS report
CCCOE
3rd qtr QRIS report
CCCOE
Komal/Rose
Child Development
Audit documentation
begins
Child Development
Audit-Interim phase
Child Development
Audit Begins
Child Development
Audit Year-end
Child Development
Audit submission to
CDE (which can be
extended till February
2021
Rose/Ali
Stage 2 & CAPP
Reports Due to CDE
(20th of each month)
Stage 2 & CAPP
Reports Due to CDE
(20th of each month)
Stage 2 & CAPP
Reports Due to CDE
(20th of each month)
Stage 2 & CAPP
Reports Due to CDE
(20th of each month)
Stage 2 & CAPP
Reports Due to CDE
(20th of each month)
Stage 2 & CAPP
Reports Due to CDE
(20th of each month)
Stage 2 & CAPP
Reports Due to CDE
(20th of each month)
Stage 2 & CAPP
Reports Due to CDE
(20th of each month)
Stage 2 & CAPP
Reports Due to CDE
(20th of each month)
Stage 2 & CAPP
Reports Due to CDE
(20th of each month)
Stage 2 & CAPP
Reports Due to CDE
(20th of each month)
Stage 2 & CAPP
Reports Due to CDE
(20th of each month)
Ali CACFP CMIPS
Submitted
Indirect Cost Rate
Proposal Due to US
Dept. of Health &
Human Services
Year-end
Appropriation
Adjustments
Isabel Renggenathen
Ron
EHS: Take home family
activities monthly Dec-
June
Afi
HS: Take home family
activities monthly Dec-
June
Special Events
Education
Team &
Cluster ADs
"Dual Language
Learner" Celebration
Feb 21-25
Dr. Seuss Birthday
March 2
Teachers Appreciation
Week May 2-6
International Mud Day
June 29
Contracts:
ELCD/CCDD Contracts
Full Day/Part Day-
Begin Screenings and
DRDP Assessments
Complete ECERS/ITERS
by 11/30
Complete DRDP
Summary of Findings
by 12/30
Compile DRDP Parent
Surveys by Contract
Complete Agency
Summary of Findings
Review Parent Survey
Results & Share with
Senior Mgmt., BOS,
and PC. Submit
Report to Analyst.
Ron & Afi
Present Final Update
of SR Goals from
Previous Year to PC
Program Svs
subcomm., PC, BOS,
Sr. Mgmt., and staff
Present Baseline SR
goals to PC Prog Svs
Subcommittee and
Sr.Mgmt.
Present Baseline SR
goals to PC, BOS and
staff
Present Mid-Year SR
Updates to PC Prog
Svs Subcomm. and Sr.
Mgmt.
Present Mid-Year SR
Updates to PC, BOS,
and staff
Prep/planning Take Home Activities
Prep/planning Take Home Activities
School Readiness:
Reports
School Readiness:
Reports (cont.)
Family Engagement
CSB Planning Calendar 2021-2022 4
2021-2022 CSB Planning Calendar
Education
Team
Final DRDP Outcomes
Report to PC Program
Svs subcomm., PC,
BOS, Sr. Mgmt., and
staff
First DRDP Outcomes
Report for Current
Program Year to PC
Prog Svs subcomm.
and Sr. Mgmt.
First DRDP Outcomes
Report for Current
Program Year to PC,
BOS and staff
2nd DRDP Outcomes
Report for Current
Program Year to PC
Prog Svs Subcomm.
and Sr. Mgmt.
2nd DRDP Outcomes
Report to PC, BOS and
staff
Education
Team
In-Service for Full-day
teachers & Pre-Service
for PD/PY Teachers
Kinder-Readiness
Activities: Parent
Meetings, RMTK
Kinder-Readiness
Registration
Information to Parents
and Visits to Kinder
Classes
Prepare Kindergarten
Transition Packets
Distribution of SR
Packets/ backpacks
(Transition to
Kindergarten)
Isabel & Ron PITC Training for EHS
staff
PITC Training for EHS
staff
PITC Training for EHS
staff
PITC Training for EHS
staff
PITC Training for EHS
staff
Magda Bedros
Communication:
Regional Office (RO)
Child Outcomes Year-
End Report to RO via
CAO report (No
report due to COVID-
19; requirement
waived)
Child Outcomes
Baseline Report to RO
via CAO report
Child Outcomes Mid-
Year Report to RO via
CAO report
Family Engagement Education
Team
HS: Take home family
activities monthly Dec-
June
Grantee and YMCA Quarterly Grantee and
Delegate Meeting
Quarterly Grantee and
YMCA
Community Based
Partnerships MOU
Status Check
Quarterly Grantee and
Delegate Meeting
Quarterly Grantee and
Delegate Meeting
Quarterly Grantee and
Delegate Meeting
Bi-Monthly CoCo Kids
Meetings
Bi-Monthly CoCo Kids
Meetings
Bi-Monthly CoCo Kids
Meetings
Bi-Monthly CoCo Kids
Meetings
Bi-Monthly CoCo Kids
Meetings
Program self-
evaluation
documentation for
state program due
Bi-Monthly CoCo Kids
Meetings
Annual Federal
Partner Meeting
Pedestrian Safety
Training Required
Begin Kindergarten
Transitions/
Trainings
CLASS Training for
Partners
Child Abuse/DV
Prevention Training
Required
Tri-monthly Partner
Learning Community
Meeting
Tri-monthly Partner
Learning Community
Meeting
Tri-monthly Partner
Learning Community
Meeting
Tri-monthly Partner
Learning Community
Meeting
Fees/9400 Trainings
for State Partners
Annual State Partner
Meeting State Partner Meeting State Partner Meeting
Planning: CS Desk review Magda and
Michelle
Michelle Mankewich
Communication:
Families Family Newsletter
Family Newsletter
and Winter Safety
Newsletter
Family Newsletter Summer Safety
Newsletter
Communication:
Families
Education
Team
Monthly Parent
Meetings
PD/PY Calendar Given
to Families
PD/PY 1 Week Winter
Break
Communication:
Families
Provide Family
Handbooks to Families
Pedestrian Safety
Training Required
Begin Kindergarten
Transitions/
Training
Family Handbook
Updates (Every 2
years, 2021-2023)
Child Abuse/DV
Prevention Training
Required
Give Kids a Smile Day
Give Kids a Smile Day
(GKSD) - Planning
Meetings with Contra
Costa Dental Society,
Children's Oral Health
Program
Give Kids a Smile Day
Preparation and
Implementation of
GKSD Plan weekly
emails to staff
Give Kids a Smile Day
Event-(1st Friday of
the Month of
February)
Give Kids a Smile Day
Post Meeting
La Clinica and Life Long Dental Vans
Monthly at Selected
Sites (as vans are
available)
Hearing and Vision
Certification/Training
CSB & CHDP Hearing &
Vision Training for CSB
and Local Health
Providers
CSB & CHDP Hearing &
Vision Training for CSB
and Local Health
Providers
CSB & CHDP Hearing &
Vision Training for CSB
and Local Health
Providers
PD/PY 1 Week Spring Break
(Aligned with Local School Districts)
Partnerships:
Communication
CS Desk Guide and Forms review (Every 2
years - 2023)
Prep/planning Take Home Activities
School Readiness: Reports
School Readiness:
Reports (cont.)
School Readiness:
Transitions: Into, Throughout & Out
of Program
CSB Planning Calendar 2021-2022 5
2021-2022 CSB Planning Calendar
Sophia
National Food Day -
October 24th CCFP
Roundtable
Conference
"Pride in Food Service
Week" -- First week in
February
National Nutrition
Month
Annual California
Dietetic Association
Meeting & Exhibition
National Fruit and
Veggie Day (June 17th
is Eat All Your Veggies
Day)
Monthly Parent
Meetings / Trainings
Quarterly Family
Nutrition Meeting
Quarterly Family
Nutrition Meeting
Quarterly Family
Nutrition Meeting
Quarterly Family
Nutrition Meeting
Education
Team & Site
Supervisors
Collect WOTYC Plans
for Centers WOTYC Celebrations
Collect Year-End
Celebration Plans for
the Center
Year-End Celebrations
Education
Team
Education
Team
Education
Team
Cathy &
Sophia
Health & Nutrition
Services Advisory
Committee Meeting
Health & Nutrition
Services Advisory
Committee Meeting
Make Parenting A
Pleasure Curriculum
(Monthly excluding
August)
Site
Supervisors
Planning: CS Desk review Magda and
Michelle
Michelle Recognition of
Outgoing PC Members
PC Orientation (off-
site) on Saturday
September (TBD) and
Election of New PC
Executive Committee
Recruitment, Election
& Finalization of
Subcommittee
PC/BOS Joint Meeting PC Orientation
Planning Begins
PC/BOS Joint Meeting
Planning Begins
Ana Make-Up PC
Orientation
Facilitative Leadership
Training
Ethics/Brown Act
Video Training Due
Exec team attend
NHSA PFCE
conference
Ana
Monthly PC Meeting
(except July and
December)
Ana
Monthly
Subcommittee
Meetings (except July,
September and
December)
Monica DeVera
Human Resources: Monitoring Monitor transcripts
TAT
Monitor transcripts
TAT
Monitor transcripts
TAT
Ongoing new
employee orientation
Licensing Orientation
(At time of hire for SS)
First Aid CPR (Every 2
years ongoing)
Integrated Pest
Management Training
(Annually Sept./Oct.)
Mandated Reporter
(At time of hire)-EHSD
CSB Standards of
Conduct
15 Hours of
Professional
Development
(Ongoing)
Itsy Bitsy Read and Parent Power Reading Workshops
(year round)
Male Involvement Events (year round)
Family Financial Fitness Workshops
Fall Harvest Festivals (may be canceled
postponed due to COVID-19)
EHS PFCE
Home Family Activities to support SR PFCE Goals
HS PFCE
Prep/Planning Home Family Activities to
support SR PFCE Goals
HS PFCE
Home Family Activities to support SR PFCE Goals
Open House
EHS PFCE
Prep/Planning Home Family Activities to
support SR PFCE Goals
Family Engagement
Healthy and Active Lifestyle
CS Desk Guide and Forms review (Every 2
years - 2021)
ESL Classes ESL Classes
Human Resources:
Required Training
Human Resources:
Required Training (cont.)
Policy Council:
PC Meetings and Trainings
CSB Planning Calendar 2021-2022 6
2021-2022 CSB Planning Calendar
General HIPAA
Awareness Training
(upon hire and bi-
annual for applicable
staff)
Legislation
Quarterly Report at
Senior Management
Meeting
Quarterly Report at
Senior Management
Meeting
Quarterly Report at
Senior Management
Meeting
Report on Federal
Budget
Quarterly Report at
Senior Management
Meeting
Report to Sr.
Management on
May's Legislative
Revision
Monique Young Edwards
Communication:
Staff
Update external
calendar meetings
Vacation Request due
for 4th Quarter
Vacation Request Due
for 1st Quarter
Vacation Request Due
for 2nd Quarter
Vacation Request due
for 3rd Quarter
Nasim Eghlima
Contracts:
Partnerships CACFP Contract
Begin Contract
Renewals for
Contracts Due in
November *with the
exception of CSBG
contracts
Begin Contract
Renewals for
Contracts Due in
December and
January*with the
exception of CSBG
contracts
Action: BOS Approval
of Contracts
Begin Contract
Renewals for
Contracts Due in July
(Pending Slots) *with
the exception of CSBG
contracts)
Action: BOS Approval
of Contracts
Nelly Ige
CALWORKS STAGE 2/ALTERNATIVE
PAYMENT PROGRAM: Families
Distribute Stage
2/CAPP Program
Handbook (If updates
made)
CALWORKS STAGE 2/ALTERNATIVE
PAYMENT PROGRAM: Audit Fiscal Audit
Monthly CSAM & Unit
Meetings
CAPPA & EveryChild
California Annual
Conference
CLOUDS Annual
Conference
Management Bulletin
for CDE Refunding
Application
Application Due for
CDE Refunding
Application For Next
Fiscal Year
Submit Self-Evaluation
to CDE/CDSS on June
1st.
Compile Parent
Surveys (All Programs)
Review Parent Survey
Results & Share with
Senior Mgmt. BOS,
and PC.
FY 2022-2023 Contract
Renewal for All
Program Types
Monthly Quality
Control Review of
Utility Assistance
CSD Console Bi-Annual
On-Site Monitoring
Visit
CSD Console Bi-Annual
On-Site Monitoring
Visit
CSD Annual On-Site
Monitoring Visit
Quarterly Quality
Control Review with
DCD (3rd Thursday)
Quarterly Quality
Control Review with
DCD (3rd Thursday)
Quarterly Quality
Control Review with
DCD (3rd Thursday)
Quarterly Quality
Control Review with
DCD (3rd Thursday)
Monthly Utility
Assistance Meeting
Quarterly Local Service
Provider Meeting
Quarterly Local Service
Provider Meeting
Quarterly Local Service
Provider Meeting
Quarterly Local Service
Provider Meeting
Bi-Monthly
LIHEAP/DOE Meeting
with DCD
Bi-Monthly
LIHEAP/DOE Meeting
with DCD
Bi-Monthly
LIHEAP/DOE Meeting
with DCD
Bi-Monthly
LIHEAP/DOE Meeting
with DCD
Bi-Monthly
LIHEAP/DOE Meeting
with DCD
Bi-Monthly
LIHEAP/DOE Meeting
with DCD
LIHEAP Action Day
Training
Energy Annual
Convention
1st Period Monitoring
Begins: Center,
Curriculum Fidelity,
ERS, File Review
2nd Period Monitoring
Begins: Center,
Curriculum Fidelity,
ERS, File Review
End Monitoring
Semi-Annual Child
Safety Checklist
Semi-Annual Child
Safety Checklist
Contracts:
ELCD/CCDD Contracts
Review and Update Stage 2/CAPP Program
Handbook (if applicable)
Draft Self-Evaluation Action Plan
Prepare, Distribute and Collect Parent Survey
for Alternative Payment Programs
Ongoing Monitoring: Monitoring
CLASS Monitoring CLASS Monitoring
Human Resources:
Required Training
Human Resources:
Required Training (cont.)
LIHEAP/Dept of Energy:
Monitoring/Review
LIHEAP/Dept of Energy:
Meetings/Conferences
CALWORKS STAGE 2/ALTERNATIVE
PAYMENT PROGRAM:
Meetings/Conferences
CSB Planning Calendar 2021-2022 7
2021-2022 CSB Planning Calendar
Present 2nd Period
Semi-Annual Report to
PC Monitoring/ Self-
Assessment
Subcommittee, PC,
CAO, ACF, Senior
Managers, Site
Supervisors, CS
Managers, Partners,
and Staff
Present 1st Period
Semi-Annual Report to
PC Monitoring/ Self
Assessment
Subcommittee, PC,
CAO, ACF, Senior
Managers, Site
Supervisors, CS
Managers, Partners,
and Staff
Review Slot Map Plans
and Update for New
Period Schedule for
Center Monitoring
and Sample Size
Calculation for Files
and Classrooms
Communication:
Regional Office (RO)
Monthly Calls with the
RO; Child Restraint
System annual waiver
due by July 1
School Readiness (SR)
Visit for RO
Semi-Annual T/TA POC
Check In Meeting
School Readiness (SR)
visit for RO
Semi-Annual T/TA POC
Check In Meeting
Monthly Enrollment
Report Due to HSES by
the 7th
Weekly 30-day Full
Enrollment Checks
and Reports
New Federal Income
Guidelines Issued
Eligibility Refresher
Training PD/PY Classes End
PD/PY Classes Begin
Review/ Revise
Recruitment Materials
Begin Major
Recruitment Drive
Monthly - Purge
Waitlist
Submit Request for
Flyers to be Mailed
with Public Benefit
Quarterly Reports
Submit Request for
Flyers to be Mailed
with Public Benefit
Quarterly Reports
Eligibility, Recruitment, Selection,
Enrollment, Attendance (ERSEA):
Selection
Hold Selection Criteria
Meeting with Staff,
Parents, and Program
Services
Subcommittee
Action: PC Approves
Selection Criteria and
Recruitment Plan
Action: BOS Approves
Selection Criteria and
Recruitment Plan
Establish Procedure
and Timelines for
Rollover
Purge Over-Income
Waiver List
Eligibility, Recruitment, Selection,
Enrollment, Attendance (ERSEA):
Attendance & Planning
Monthly Attendance
Report for BOS/PC
Slot Planning for Next
PY
Finalized Slots Map for
Next PY
Distribute Slots Map
for Next PY
Receive Funding
Guidance Letter,
Conduct Grant Writing
Process with Assigned
Team Members,
Including Goals &
Objectives (G&O)
Action: Request PC
and BOS Approval for
Submission of Grant,
Budgets and Goals &
Objectives.
Action: Upload Grant
Documents and
Submit Through HSES
Present Grant Cycle
Process Overview to
PC at Orientation
Share Grantee
Timeline Tasks with
Delegate
Program G/O Updates
Semi-Annual Report
Disseminated G/O to
Staff, Department
Director, PC, and BOS
Program G/O Updates
Semi-Annual Report
Disseminated to Staff,
Department Director,
PC, and BOS
Announce
Continuation Grant
Cycle to PC, Including
Year-End Monitoring
Results (CSB Director's
Report)
Haydee SF-425 Semi-annual
report due to ACF
Action: Upload Budget
by object total and
justification thru HSES
SF-425 Annual Report
due to ACF
SF-425 Final Report
due to ACF
Recordkeeping & Reporting:
Program Information Report
Quarterly Meeting CSB
and FBHS
Upload PIR by August
31st
Submit to BOS in CAO
Report; Present at
SAM, Sr. Mgmt. and
Cluster Mgmts..
Quarterly Meeting CSB
and FBHS Present to PC Quarterly Meeting CSB
and FBHS
Quarterly Meeting CSB
and FBHS
Review/Update Content of Monitoring Tools and Handbooks
Root Cause Analysis & Implementation of
Corrective Action Plan
Root Cause Analysis & Implementation of
Corrective Action Plan
Eligibility & Enrollment Clinics
Continue Recruitment Drive
Eligibility, Recruitment, Selection,
Enrollment, Attendance (ERSEA):
Eligibility/ Enrollment
Eligibility, Recruitment, Selection,
Enrollment, Attendance (ERSEA):
Recruitment
Sarah Reich
GRANTS:
HS/EHS/EHS-CCP Grants
(09CH010862)
(formerly 09CH9115 and
09HP000111)
Ongoing Monitoring: Reports
CSB Planning Calendar 2021-2022 8
2021-2022 CSB Planning Calendar
E-Rate BEAR (Billed
Entity Applicant
Reimbursement)
/472
E-Rate RFI E-Rate Form 470 USAC PIA Review E-Rate/USAC PIA
Review
Invoicing
USAC/Service Provider
for Reimbursement
RFI for Next Year's
Technology Needs
RFI for Tele-
Communication/Inter
net/Internal
Connection
Action: BOS Approval
for Incoming Funds
Review Prior Years E-
Rate Form 471 Grant
Application
E-Rate Form 486
USAC Conference
Business Systems: CLOUDS CLOUDS User Group
Meeting
CLOUDS User Group
Meeting
CLOUDS User
Conference
CLOUDS User Group
Meeting
Review Contract by
County Counsel CLOUDS User Group
Meeting CLOUDS Renewal
Quarterly Deep
Cleaning EHS &
Kitchen
Annual Deep Cleaning
HS
Certification for
Playground Safety
Inspector (Expires
Every 4 Years)
Quarterly Deep
Cleaning EHS &
Kitchen
Quarterly Deep
Cleaning EHS &
Kitchen
Quarterly Deep
Cleaning EHS &
Kitchen
Health & Safety Officer
Committee Meeting
Health & Safety Officer
Committee Meeting
Health & Safety Officer
Committee Meeting
Health & Safety Officer
Committee Meeting
Emergency
Preparedness Training
and Great Shake Out
Statewide Earthquake
Drill
Begin CARES Act
Contract with CSD
Begin ARPA Contract
with CSD
Continuation of
CARES Act Contract
with CSD
Begin LIHEAP Contract
with CSD for PY 2022
End of CARES Act
Contract with CSD
Continuation DOE
Contract with CSD for
PY 2020
End of PY 2020 DOE
Contract
Low Income Home Energy Assistance
Program/Department of Energy:
Reports Ali/Sung 20th: EARS Monthly
Report
Sung Kim
E-Rate Form 471
Business Systems: E-Rate
Contracts: LIHEAP/DOE/ARPA/CARES
ACT
Business Systems: Facilities/Center
Health and Safety
CSB Planning Calendar 2021-2022 9
RECOMMENDATION(S):
ACCEPT the Contra Costa County Public Law Library Board of Trustees' July 2020 - June 2021 Annual
Report.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
California Business and Professions Code Section 6349 states, "Each board of law library trustees, on or
before the 15th day of October of each year, shall make an annual report to the board of supervisors of the
county in which the law library is maintained, for the preceding fiscal year ending on the 30th day of June.
A copy of the report shall be filed with the auditor of the county. The report shall give the condition of
their trust, with full statements of all their property and money received, whence derived, how used and
expended, the number of books, periodicals and other publications on hand, the number added by purchase,
gift, or otherwise during the year, the number lost or missing, and other information as might be of
interest."
Additionally, per Resolution 2020/1, each advisory body to the Board of Supervisors shall submit annually
to the Board of Supervisors a report on its activities, accomplishments, membership attendance, required
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Lauren Hull, (925)
655-2007
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board
of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc:
C. 50
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Monica Nino, County Administrator
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Contra Costa County Public Law Library Annual Report to Board of Supervisors - July 2020 - June 2021
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
> training/certification and proposed work plan or objective for the following year.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the report is not accepted, the Board will not have an official record of the Public Law Library Board
of Trustees' activities in the past year and will not meet the requirements of the California Business and
Professions Code Section 6349.
ATTACHMENTS
2020-2021 Public Law Library Annual Report
RECOMMENDATION(S):
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the
County Unpaid Student Training Agreement #74-637 with Unitek College, an educational institution, to
provide supervised field instruction at Contra Costa Behavioral Health program sites for medical office
administration students, for the period from October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2024.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This is a nonfinancial agreement with no budgetary or financial impact to the department.
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of this agreement is to provide Unitek College students with the opportunity to integrate
academic knowledge with applied skills at progressively higher levels of performance and responsibility.
Supervised fieldwork experience for students is considered to be an integral part of both educational and
professional preparation. The Health Services Department can provide the requisite field education, while
at the same time, benefitting from the students’ services to patients.
Approval of Unpaid Student Training Agreement #74-637 with Unitek College will allow students to
receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience, at Contra Costa Behavioral Health program sites
through September 30, 2024.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D,
925-957-5201
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Alaina Floyd, marcy.wilham
C. 51
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Unpaid Student Training Agreement #74-637 with Unitek College
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this contract is not approved, the students will not receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience
at Contra Costa Behavioral Health program sites.
ATTACHMENTS
unitek college
RECOMMENDATION(S):
Approve the list of providers recommended by Contra Costa Health Plan's Peer Review Credentialing
Committee and the Health Services Director on September 14, 2021, as required by the State Departments
of Health Care Services and Managed Health Care, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact for this action.
BACKGROUND:
The National Committee on Quality Assurance (NCQA) requires that evidence of Board Approval must be
contained within each Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) provider’s credentials file. Approval of this list of
providers as recommended by the CCHP Medical Director will enable the Contra Costa Health Plan to
comply with this requirement.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If this action is not approved, Contra Costa Health Plan’s Providers would not be appropriately credentialed
and not be in compliance with the NCQA.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 10/12/2021 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Candace Andersen, District II
Supervisor
Diane Burgis, District III
Supervisor
Karen Mitchoff, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Sharron Mackey,
925-313-6104
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: October 12, 2021
Monica Nino, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy
cc: Terri Bostick, Marcy Wilhelm
C. 52
To:Board of Supervisors
From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director
Date:October 12, 2021
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Approve New and Recredentialing Providers in Contra Costa Health Plan’s Community Provider Network
ATTACHMENTS
Attachment
Contra Costa Health Plan
Providers Approved by the PRCC
September 14, 2021
CREDENTIALING PROVIDER S SEPTEMBER 2021
Name Specialty
Aguilar, Krystal, ACSW Mental Health Services
Amirzadeh, Ali, MD Allergy and Immunology/
Obesity Medicine
Balayan, Shai na -Jill, NP Mid-Level Pediatrics
Burtch, Maggie, NP Mid-Level Family Planning
Buttars, Alexandra, PT Physical Therapy
Castillo, Lisa, RBT, MA Qualified Autism Provider
Coll, Lauren, BCBA, MS Qualified Autism Provider
Dawson, Brittany, MS, RBT Qualified Autism Provider
De la Guardia, Jose, NP Family Medicine
Diamond, Jan, MD Hepatology
Ellis, Mary, AMFT Mental Health Services
Fang, Kathy, MD Dermatology
Floyd, Heather, MFT Mental Health Services
Gong, Derek, MD Internal Medicine
Gonzales, Lisa, LPCC, MS Mental Health Services
Hansel, Neila, BCBA, MS Qualified Autism Provider
Ho, Elizabeth, BCBA, MA Qualified Autism Provider
Hoang, Cathy, BCBA, MS Qualified Autism Provider
Contra Costa Health Plan
Providers Approved by the PRCC September 14, 2021
CREDENTIALING PROVIDER S SEPTEMBER 2021
Name Specialty
Isariuz, Alexsa, BCBA, M.Ed Qualified Autis m Provider
Izzo, Paulina, AMFT, MA Mental Health Services
Jones, Joscelyn, BCBA, MS Qualified Autism Provider
Lacanlale, Jason, DPT Physical Therapy
Leasure, Jordyn, BCBA, MA Qualified Autism Provider
Lee, Vera NP Mid Level Dermatology
Leong, Linda, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider
Louis, Paige, DPT Physical Therapy
Lugto, Leslie, MS Qualified Autism Provider
Matias, Jessica, DPT Physical Therapy
Mendez Parra, Miriam, AMFT Mental Health Services
Ranahan, Nicole, NP Mid-Level Internal Medicine
Raskin, Curtis, MD Dermatology
Shafarman, Eric, BCBA, MA Qualified Autism Provider
Steely, Alexandria, ACSW Mental Health Services
Sweeney, Walter MD Plastic Surgery
Sweet, Charles, MD Psychiatry
Yamaguchi, Justin, DPT Physical Therapy
Contra Costa Health Plan
Providers Approved by the PRCC
September 14, 2021
CREDENTIALING PROVIDER S SEPTEMBER 2021
Name Specialty
Zucker, Jenna, AMFT Mental Health Services
CREDEN TIALING ORGANIZATIONAL PROVIDERS
SEPTEMBER 2021
Provi der Name
Provide the Following
S ervices
Location
DaVita Castro Valley Dialysis
Dialysis Castro Valley
Lake Merritt Healthcare Care Skilled Nursing
Facility
Oakland
Windsor Country Drive Care
Center
Skilled Nursing
Facility
Fremont
Windsor Gardens Care Center
of Hayward
Skilled Nursing
Facility
Hayward
RECREDENTIALING PR OVIDERS SEPTEMBER 2021
Name Specialty
Castillo, Peter, MD Urogynecology & Pelvic
Reconstructive Surgery
Crawford, Megan, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider
Crowe, Rebecca M.Ed, RBT Qualified Autism Provider
Del Rio, Gerald, MD IM/Pulmonary disease
Contra Costa Health Plan
Providers Approved by the PRCC September 14, 2021
RECREDENTIALING PR OVIDERS SEPTEMBER 2021
Name Specialty
Dietrick, James, DC Chiropractic Medicine
Friedman, Yaron, MD OB/GYN
Harris, Jennifer, BCBA-D, MFT Qualified Autism Provider
Hosseini, Mehra, MD Gastroenterology
Howard, Sage, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider
Khan, Tanveer, MD Surgery Cardiothoracic
Lee, Jenny, MFT Mental Health Services
Nagesetty, Rajiv, MD Surgery- Vascular
Nguyen, Bach-Kim, Optometry
Rajapuram, Gurunath, MD Cardiovascular Disease
Rhodes, Gregory, MD Surgery - General/Vascular
Scott-Rusenbluth, Rachel, BCBA Qualified Autism Provider
Slipa, Michael, MD Gastroenterology
Contra Costa Health Plan
Providers Approved by the PRCC
September 14, 2021
RECREDENTIALING PROVIDER S SEPTEMBER 2021
Name Specialty
Thuruthickara, Rosin MA, RBT Qualified Autism Provider
Toma, Marissa, MD
Surgery - Vascular
Uchiyama, Merry MD
Surgery- Thoracic
Veeragandham, Ramesh, MD Surgery - Cardiothoracic
Velarde, Elizabeth MA, RBT Qualified Autism Provider
RECREDENTIALING OR GANIZATION AL PROVIDER S
SEPTEMBER 2021
Provi der Name
Provide the Following
Services
Location
A Plus Hospice, Inc Hospice
Pleasanton
Bayhealth Inc Home Health
Campbell
Gateway Home Health Corp Home Health Campbell
Healthflex Home Health
Services
Home Health Oakland
Luxor Care Home Health
Services
Home Health Vallejo
Shadelands Endovascular, LLC
Surgery Center Walnut Creek
Contra Costa Health Plan
Providers Approved by the PRCC September 14, 2021
RECREDENTIALING OR GANIZATION AL PROVIDER S
SEPTEMBER 2021
Provi der Name
Provide the Following
Services
Location
South Springs Home Health
Care
Home Health San Jose
Bopl-SEPTEMBER 14, 2021