Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 10221985 - 1.63 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS " 0 - I Contra FROM: Phil Batchelor, County Administrator 1& Costa DATE: October 14 , 1985 County SUBJECT: Report from Drug Abuse Board on "Designer Drugs" SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: Acknowledge receipt of report from the Drug Abuse Board, in response to Board referral of July 16, 1985 and authorize the Chairwoman to send a letter to Governor Deukmejian expressing the Board' s concerns regarding the Governor' s veto of additional drug funds from the 1985-1986 State Budget. BACKGROUND: On July 16 , the Board received a presentation from the Drug Abuse Board. At that time, the Board of Supervisors indicated its concern with the growing problem of "designer drugs" which are slightly altered chemical compositions which, because of their altered composition, are not yet specifically illegal, but have been found to be far more powerful and dangerous than heroin. At 'the same time, the Board of Supervisors was made aware of the Governor ' s veto of additional funds which had been approved by the Legislature. The Drug Abuse Board has now filed the attached report with the Board of Supervisors and has prepared a suggested letter to' send to the Governor. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE: L7�C RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE X APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) ACTION OF BOARD ON October 22, 1985 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _ OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISOR 7NfE DATE SHOWN. County Administrator /?e CC: Health Services Director ATTESTED — Chairman, Drug Abuse Board PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR M382/7-88 BY /�?,( DEPUTY 4 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT ALCOHOL/DRUG ABUSE/MENTAL HEALTH DIVISION To: Board Of Supervisors Date: September 25, 1985 From: Drug Abuse Advisory Board Subject: Information on Controlled Substances Analogs Jack ChamplJPro' ram Acting Drug Chief There is a growing problem of controlled susbstances analogs, commonly known as "designer drugs," which are in most instances analogs of the fentanyl family of synthetic opiates. Fentanyl itself is currently covered as a Schedule II drug which has some legitimate medical uses. There is, however, no general provision in present law which covers the two base structures from which all forms of fen— tanyl are derived (acetylfentanyl and acetylthiofentanyl). AB 2401, expected to be on the Governor' s desk for signature amends Schedule II to cover these two compounds and all their derivatives, thus encompassing the entire fentanyl family. There has been a substantial increase in the manufacture and sale of fentanyl derivatives in recent years. Such drugs, which are easier to produce than LSD, are being manufactured by clandestine laboratories and sold on the street misrepresented as heroin ("China White") or designer drugs ("new heroin"). These slightly altered chemical compounds of narcotic analgesics mimic heroin in look and effect. These drugs, however, are far more potent than heroin or morphine. They also do not mix well when "cut", thus resulting in wide variations in strength. The average found by State laboratories ranged from 100 to 1,000 times as strong as morphine, with some samples testing more than 10,000 times as strong as morphine. The extreme and unstable potency of these drugs inevitably leads to disasterous consequences for the consumer -- approximately 100 deaths in recent years in California. Officials now estimate that the growing use of designer drugs is claiming five lives a month from overdoses. Contra Costa County has seen an increasing street distribution of these drugs in the past two years with resultant overdoses and nine deaths to date attributed to Fentanyl. There may have been more, but as little as three parts per trillion in laboratory analysis to determine positive tests of these drugs make sure identification difficult. Attachment "A" Contra Costa County Drug Abuse Program Unment Needs Estimated Annual Cost (A.) 1 adult outpatient counselor $ 30,000 (B.) Six bed residential drug treatment program for women with children 150,000 (C. ) Adult residential re—entry program 30,000 (D.) Augment adolescent outpatient staff by 4 F.T.E. counselors 120,000 (E. ) Community school based prevention programs for children and 200,000 adolescents (F. ) Adolescent wilderness prevention/early intervention program with 40,000 minority community focus (G. ) Adolescent residential drug treatment program — 18 bed 250,000 (H. ) Ten percent COLA for current contract programs 45,000 staff and additional program operational increases Board of Supervisors 9/25/85 Page 2 Apprehension of the chemist(s) responsible for these substances is unlikely. According to Gary Henderson, contract chemist for the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, "I doubt very much if the guy who made China White has a lab set up. Most likely, he made a few grams of the drug - millions of doses - and then shut up his shop. Or maybe he made all the varying analogs (for Fentanyl) at once and is parceling them out one at a time. No lab has ever been seized." JC/ln DRUG ABUSE BOARD ACK, RECEIPT OF REPORT 2 . DESIGNER DRUGS LTR TO GOVENOR AUTN _�