Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02242009 -CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES GOVERNED BY THE BOARD BOARD CHAMBERS ROOM 107, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 651 PINE STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-1229 SUSAN A. BONILLA, CHAIR, 4th DISTRICT JOHN GIOIA, 1st DISTRICT GAYLE B. UILKEMA, 2nd DISTRICT MARY N. PIEPHO, 3rd DISTRICT FEDERAL D. GLOVER, 5th DISTRICT DAVID J. TWA, CLERK OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, (925) 335-1900 The Board of Supervisors respects your time, and every attempt is made to accurately estimate when an item may be heard by the Board. All times specified for items on the Board of Supervisors agenda are approximate. Items may be heard later than indicated depending on the business of the day. Your patience is appreciated. SUMMARY AGENDA February 24, 2009            PROJECTED TIME 9:00 A.M. Convene and announce adjournment to Closed Session, Room 101.   Closed Session Agenda A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS 1. Agency Negotiators: Ted Cwiek and Keith Fleming. Employee Organizations: Contra Costa County Employees’ Assn., Local No. 1; Am. Fed., State, County, & Mun. Empl., Locals 512 and 2700; Calif. Nurses Assn.; Service Empl. Int’l Union, Local1021; District Attorney’s Investigators Assn.; Deputy Sheriffs Assn.; United Prof. Firefighters, Local 1230; Physicians’ & Dentists’ Org. of Contra Costa; Western Council of Engineers; United Chief Officers Assn.; Service Empl. Int’l Union United Health Care Workers West; East County Firefighters’ Assn.; Contra Costa County Defenders Assn.; Probation Peace Officers Assn. of Contra Costa County; Contra Costa County Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; and Prof. & Tech. Engineers, Local 21, Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; and Prof. & Tech. Engineers, Local 21, AFL-CIO. 2. Agency Negotiators: David Twa and Keith Fleming. Unrepresented Employees: All unrepresented agency management employees (Resolutions Nos. 2008/715 and 2008/359, including their respective exhibits), and all other unrepresented agency employees. B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov. Code, § 54956.9(a)) Bernice Peoples v. County of Contra Costa, U.S.D.C. No. C 07-0051 MHP C. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Title: Fire Chief, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District D. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to Gov. Code, § 54956.9(b): Two potential cases. E. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to Gov. Code, § 54956.9(c): One potential case.    Summary: There were no Closed Session Announcements.   9:30 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. Inspirational Thought - "The achievements of an organization are the results of the combined effort of each individual ." ~ Vincent T. Lombardi   CONSIDER CONSENT ITEMS (Items listed as C.1 through C.103 on the following agenda) – Items are subject to removal from Consent Calendar by request of any Supervisor or on request for discussion by a member of the public. Items removed from this section will be considered with the Short Discussion Items.   PRESENTATIONS   PR.1 PRESENTATION to proclaim February 24, 2009 as national "Spay Day USA    PR.1 PRESENTATION to proclaim February 24, 2009 as national "Spay Day USA 2009" in Contra Costa County and to observe and recognize responsible pet ownership and kindness to animals by encouraging the citizens of the County to have their pets spayed or neutered. (Glenn Howell, Animal Services Director)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover PR.2 PRESENTATION to declare February 23 through March 2, 2009 as "Peace Corps Week in Contra Costa County". (Supervisor Bonilla)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover PR.3 PRESENTATION on the results of the 2008 Contra Costa County Combined Charities Campaign. (Joe Valentine, Director, Employment and Human Services)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover PR.4 PRESENTATION recognizing John Muir Medical Center for superior performance as the Contra Costa County designated Level II Trauma Center. (Art Lathrop, Health Services Department)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover SHORT DISCUSSION ITEMS   SD.1 CONSIDER Consent Items previously removed.     SD.2 PUBLIC COMMENT (3 Minutes/Speaker)      AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover SD.3 CONSIDER naming the Richmond Courthouse the “George D. Carroll Courthouse”. (Supervisor Gioia)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover SD.4 HEARING to consider adoption of Resolution of Necessity for acquisition by eminent domain the real property required for widening of Highway 4 for the State Route 4 East Loveridge Road to Somersville Road Project, Pittsburg area. (Contra Costa Transportation Authority) (Karen A. Laws, Public Works Department and Mark Weaver, Caltrans)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover SD.5 HEARING to consider adoption of Resolution No. 2009/55 accepting tabulation of mail-in ballots, confirming the Engineer’s Report and authorizing the levy of street light charges to operate and maintain facilities and services for Minor Subdivision 06-0016, Lafayette area. (County Service Service Area L-100 Funds) (Warren Lai, Public Works Department)       CLOSED the hearing; ADOPTED Resolution No. 2009/55 accepting tabulation of mail-in ballots, confirming the Engineer's Report and authorizing the levy of street light charges to operate and maintain facilities and services for Minor Subdivision 06-0016.    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover DELIBERATION ITEMS DELIBERATION ITEMS   D.1 CONSIDER accepting report on the Health Services Department Environmental Health Program describing actions taken to address problems and opportunities for improvement identified in Internal Operations Committee discussions regarding inspections and follow-up processes. (William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.2 CONSIDER accepting report regarding the mid-year status of the 2008/09 County Budget, the Department Head Summit, the State Budget, and the Economic Stimulus Package; and DIRECT the Auditor-Controller to suspend transfers to the Workers' Compensation Internal Services Fund for May and June.       County Administrator David Twa presented the item and commented on the importance of updating the County’s business models. Supervisor Piepho said that critical care and public safety are top priorities, yet said they seem to be the hardest hit by the Budget crisis. Mr. Twa responded that Health and Human Services and Public Safety are the biggest parts of the County’s General Fund and so proportionately appear to be the hardest hit. He added that there is also the issue of, Are we going to use County reserves to address this crisis? He said doing so is an easier decision if we think we are dealing with short-term problems, which in this case he said we are not. Supervisor Piepho said she would appreciate looking for a way to keep the Sheriff’s deputies, saying the proposed elimination of 70 deputies is too stark an action to take. She asked if any proposed measures for cost savings could be implemented quickly in order to help offset proposed cuts. Mr. Twa said that cost-saving measures that could be implemented immediately are being implemented now, but said that overall they will still not be a solution. He added that it will be the long-term solutions that will really make changes. Supervisor Piepho suggested it would be useful to have a discussion about how to define core services. Supervisor Uilkema asked about the District Attorney’s budget and “unforeseen retirement budget conversions.” Lisa Driscoll, County Administrator’s Office, responded that the conversions are those of employees converting years of service from Tier 2 to Tier 3 in the retirement structure, and noted that when and how much employees choose to make this conversion can obligate the County to match dollars accordingly. She added that this is happening countywide, but said that since the D.A.’s office employs attorneys – higher-cost employees – the costs in that department are higher. department are higher. Supervisor Uilkema requested clarification that this report does not address impacts to the County’s budget based on current and proposed changes to the State’s budget. Mr. Twa responded that it does not.    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.3 CONSIDER whether to join litigation filed by Sacramento County, challenging the State's deferral of mandated payments to the County for social service programs. (Silvano B. Marchesi, County Counsel)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.4 Board Member Reports of Activities. (All Districts)      Supervisor Bonilla reported hosting a community forum on the budget crisis at the Diablo Valley Democratic Club, which Dr. Walker, Director of Health Services and Joe Valentine, Director of Employment and Human Services also attended; Supervisor Uilkema reported attending a community meeting on co-sponsored Aging and Adult Services on fall prevention; Supervisor Piepho reported attending a Friday Night Live event in San Ramon Valley emphasizing the neighborhood and social impacts of juvenile alcohol consumption.    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover CLOSED SESSION 1:00 P.M. HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETING   Adjourn in memory of F. Robert Coop of Walnut Creek   CONSENT ITEMS   Road and Transportation   C.1 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/57 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to partially close a portion of Parker Avenue on March 14, 2009 from 9:00 AM through 10:00 AM for the purpose of Opening Day Parade, Rodeo area.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.2 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a Roadway Encroachment Permit with indemnification clause, issued by the County of Alameda Public Works Agency and arrange for the $225 permit fee, as required for the construction of the Vasco Road Overlay Project, Brentwood Area. (100% by Federal Economic Stimulus Bill funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Engineering Services   C.3 MS 04-00020: ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/59 accepting completion of improvements and widening of Oakgate Drive as a County road, for project being developed by Oak Gate Properties, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville (Blackhawk) area. (No Fiscal Impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.4 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/58 releasing Deficiency Deposit for project being    C.4 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/58 releasing Deficiency Deposit for project being developed by Leonard and Jeanne Steffen, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (No Fiscal Impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Special Districts & County Airports   C.5 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Airports Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company to increase the payment limit by $46,544 to a new payment limit of $1,067,200 and to extend the term from December 31, 2008 to December 31, 2009, to continue to provide consulting services related to the Buchanan Field Master Plan and Federal Aviation Regulation Part 150 Noise Study, Pacheco Area. (88% Federal Aviation Administration grant; 8% Airport Enterprise Fund; 4% CALTrans grant)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.6 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair, Board of Supervisors, as governing board of the Flood Control and Water Conservation District, to execute a reimbursement agreement with 207 Coggins Drive Associates, LLC, effective February 24, 2009 through February 24, 2019, in an amount not to exceed $214,296 for Drainage Area 44B Improvements, pursuant to the Drainage Area Credit and Reimbursement Policy, as recommended by the Chief Engineer, Pleasant Hill area. (100% Drainage Area 44B Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.7 ACCEPT the Grant of Easement from Discovery Builders, Inc., a California Corporation in connection with Subdivision 8954 (Prewett Ranch) Drainage Area 30C, Lines A & B and Anderson Lane Extension - Flood Control Access Easements, Brentwood area. (100% Permit Fees)         AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Claims, Collections & Litigation   C.8 RECEIVE report concerning the personal property loss of David Adams and authorize payment in the amount of $418, as recommended by the Risk Manager.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.9 DENY claims by Pacific Bell Telephone Company by: Maryanne Candini; Depresha Gordon; Barbara Nielsen, Sucessor Trustee of the William L. Rich; Desiri Moret-Blyden; Laura Tindall, individually and as successor in interest, for wrongful death of William Howard Tindall, Jr. deceased; Erin Tindall, a minor, by Laura Tindall, her mother, for the wrongful death of William Howard Tindall, Jr.; AAA Insurance; Meghan Meehan.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.10 GRANT application to file late claim by Lamos Wayne Sturgis.      AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.11 RECEIVE report concerning the final settlement of Duane Struntz vs. Contra Costa County and AUTHORIZE payment from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund in an amount not to exceed $55,000, less permanent disability payments, as recommended by the Risk Manager.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia    District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.12 RECEIVE report concerning the final settlement of Angela Poole vs. Contra Costa County and AUTHORIZE payment from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund in the amount of $50,000 with open lifetime medical, as recommended by the Risk Manager.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Statutory Actions   C.13 APPROVE minutes, as on file with the Clerk of the Board, for the month of January 2009.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.14 APPROVE Board Member Meeting Reports for the month of January 2009.      AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Honors & Proclamations   C.15 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/82 honoring the Caring Hands Volunteer Caregivers Program on the occasion of its 10th Anniversary, as recommended by Supervisor Piepho.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.16 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/62 to declare February 23 through March 2, 2009 as "Peace Corps Week in Contra Costa County". (See PR.2)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.17 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/79 honoring Walter Pedretti for being named the San Pablo Chamber of Commerce Citizen of the Year, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.18 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/80 recognizing Doctors Medical Center Regional Cancer Center for being named the San Pablo Chamber of Commerce Business of the Year, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.19 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/63 proclaiming February 24, 2009 as National "Spay Day USA 2009", as recommended by the Animal Services Director. (See PR.1)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.20 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/81 honoring El Cerrito Police Commander Gary E. Priebe on the occasion of his retirement, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia.         AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.21 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/67 recognizing John Muir Medical Center, Walnut Creek Campus for its superior performance as the Contra Costa County designated Level II Trauma Center, as recommended by the Health Services Director. (See PR.4)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.22 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/64 on the results of the 2008 Contra Costa County Combined Charities Campaign, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. (See PR.3)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appointments & Resignations   C.23 DECLARE vacant the Member-at-Large Seat 9 on the Advisory Council on Aging; and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Employment and Human Services Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.24 RE-APPOINT Bruce Weisenbach to the District IV Seat on the Fish & Wildlife Committee, as recommended by Supervisor Bonilla.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.25 APPOINT Michael Murray as the County Planning Commision representative on TRANSPAC, the regional transportation planning committee for Central County, as recommended by the County Planning Commission.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.26 RE-APPOINT Caryln Suzanne Obringer to the Contra Costa Commission for Women, as recommended by Supervisor Bonilla.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.27 RE-APPOINT Thomas R. Weber to the District IV seat on the Aviation Advisory Committee, as recommended by Supervisor Bonilla.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.28 DECLARE vacant the Appointee 3 Seat on the Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District's Fire Advisory Commissioners; and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Uilkema.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.29 APPOINT Florence Weiss to the District IV Public Sector on the Economic Opportunity Council, as recommended by Supervisor Bonilla.         AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.30 DECLARE vacant the District II Family Member #2 Seat on the Contra Costa County Mental Health Commission; and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Uilkema.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.31 RE-APPOINT Daniel Pellegrini to the District II Seat on the Fish and Wildlife Committee, as recommended by Supervisor Uilkema.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.32 RE-APPOINT Dr. Maureen Powers to the San Pablo Member Seat of the Western Contra Costa County Transit Authority Board, as recommended by Supervisor Uilkema.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.33 RE-APPOINT Suzanne Board to the Appointee 4 seat and Josephine Orozco Appointee 7 seat on the County Service Area R-10 Citizens Advisory Committee, as recommended by Supervisor Uilkema.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.34 RE-APPOINT Connie Batchelder to the Appointee 2 and Mary Tabor to the Appointee 4 seats on the County Service Area R-10 Citizens Advisory Committee, as recommended by Supervisor Uilkema.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.35 DECLARE vacant the C6 Air Medical Transportation Provider seat and the C2 Alternate seat on the Emergency Medical Care Committee; and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by the Health Services Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.36 RE-APPOINT Silvano B. Marchesi to be County Counsel of Contra Costa County, as recommended by Supervisor Bonilla.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appropriation Adjustments   C.37 Cooperative Extension (0630): APPROVE Appropriations and Revenue Adjustment No. 5060 authorizing new revenue in the Cooperative Extension program in the amount of $14,960 from a grant with University of California at Davis, Sea Grant Program, and appropriating it for the salaries and wages. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Personnel Actions   C.38 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/26 which supersedes Resolution No. 2008/715 (Management Resolution) regarding compensation and benefits for County Elected and Appointed Department Heads, Management, Exempt, and Unrepresented Employees to reflect changes, as recommended by the Assistant County Administrator-Director of Human Resources. (Included in Departmental Budgets)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.39 INCREASE hours for one (1) Board of Supervisors Assistant - Specialist from part time (32/40) to full time (40/40); and ADD one (1) Board of Supervisors Assistant - General Secretary part time position (24/40). (100% Transient Occupancy Tax Funding)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover NO: District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema C.40 Acting as the Governing Body of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority ADOPT attached Resolution No. 2009/65 regarding compensation and benefits for employees of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority (IHSS PA).       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.41 Acting as the Governing Body for the In-Home Support Services Public Authority (IHSS PA) ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/56 which implements personnel rules to be used by the IHSS PA, as recommended by the County Administrator.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho    District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.42 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 20656 to cancel one part time (20/40) Librarian position (represented) and increase one Librarian position from part time (20/40) to full time (40/40) (represented) in the Library. (2008/09 Library budget) (Cost Savings)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.43 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 20646 to increase hours of one Driver Clerk position (represented) from permanent intermittent to permanent part-time 20/40 in the Library. (2008/09 Library budget)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.44 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 20648 to add one permanent part-time (20/40) Driver Clerk position (represented) in the Library. (2008/09 Library budget)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.45 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 20663 to reduce the hours of one Deputy District Attorney Basic Level position from full-time to part-time (20/40) (represented) and add one Deputy District Attorney Basic Level position (20/40) (represented), as recommended by the Assistant County Administrator-Human Resources Director. (Salary Savings) (All Districts)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.46 INCREASE the hours of one (1) Board of Supervisors Assistant - Specialist position from part time (20/40) to full time (40/40). (100% Keller Canyon Mitigation Funding)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover NO: District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema Grants & Contracts   APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreements between the County and the following agencies for receipt of fund and/or services:   C.47 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, effective July 1, 2008, to amend to reflect an increase by the State, Federal Block Grant and Federal Drug Medi-Cal funding in an amount not to exceed $93,833 for Fiscal Year 2008/09 with a new payment limit of $11,608,332, and with no change in the original term of July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010. (22% State, 78% Federal)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.48 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Librarian, or designee, to partner with the City of Lafayette to accept a grant in the amount of $50,350 from the International City Management Association to provide technology and resources for emergency preparedness education and response in the new Lafayette Library and Learning Center. (no matching funds required)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.49 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to    C.49 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute a contract with the Department of Food and Agriculture to reimburse the County up to $1,013,056 for County costs for providing pest detection services from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2010.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.50 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the General Services Director, or designee, to EXECUTE a Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) funding agreement with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District in the amounty of $12,000 from March 1, 2009 through February 28, 2010. (TFCA Project No. 08R85) (82% matching Road Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.51 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute the 2008/09 Housing Rehabilitation Services Agreement with the City of Antioch in an amount not to exceed $108,000, providing for the County to operate City's Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program for fiscal year 2008/09. (100% City of Antioch reimbursement)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.52 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute the 2008/09 Housing Rehabilitation Services Agreement with the City of Walnut Creek in an amount not to exceed $46,980, providing for the County to operate the City's Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program. (100% City of Walnut Creek reimbursement)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla    District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.53 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the California Department of Education to increase the payment limit to the County by $4,735 for a new payment limit not to exceed $296,045, for full-day Pre-Kindergarten Family Literacy program services with no change to the term July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.54 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute an Interagency Agreement with Lafayette School District to pay the County an amount not to exceed $1,600 for the Public Health Clinic Services Scoliosis Screening Project for 7th and 8th grade students for the period February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2010. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.55 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute Standard Agreement (amendment) with the California Department of Health Services, Office of Oral Health, effective July 1, 2008, to decrease the amount payable to the County by $37,182, to a new total of $520,533 and to make technical adjustments to the scope of work for the Children's Dental Disease Prevention Program, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010. (No County match is required)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.56 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the General Services Director, or designee, to execute a Transportation Fund for Clean Air funding agreement with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District in the amount of $70,000 from March 1, 2009 through February 28, 2010. (Sheriff match 13% General Fund)         AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.57 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute an contract amendment with the County of Alameda, effective March 1, 2008, to increase payment to the County by $21,796 to a new payment limit of $1,246,796 for additional coordination of essential services to Contra Costa County residents with HIV Disease and their families and to make technical adjustments to the agreement, with no change in the original term of March 1, 2008 through February 28, 2009. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.58 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept on behalf of the County, Grant Award for the California Endowment to pay the County an amount not to exceed $225,000 for the Community Action to fight Asthma/Contra Costa Asthma Coalition Project, for the period July 1, 2008 through February 28, 2010. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.59 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept on behalf of the County, a Grant Award Agreement from the California Integrated Waste Management Board to pay the County an amount not to exceed $25,830 for the continuation of the Local Enforcement Agency assistance funds for the Department's Environmental Health Division (Solid Waste Program) for the period July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, including agreeing to indemnify and hold harmless the Grantor from any claims arising out of the performance of this Agreement. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla    District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.60 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept notice of Grant Award from the California Health Care Safety Net Institute to pay the County an amount not to exceed $200,000 for the Safe and Efficient Electronic Prescribing Practices for the Underserved and Uninsured in California Public Hospital Clinics Project for the period from October 15, 2008 through January 31, 2010. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.61 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept Grant Award from the California Healthcare Foundation to pay the County an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the Enabling Chronic Disease Registries Project, a Multi-Condition Chronic Disease Management System (CDMS) for the period from May 1, 2008 through February 28, 2009. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.62 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the State of California, Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board, effective December 31, 2008, to increase the amount payable to County by $1,161 to a new total of not to exceed $6,148 to continue State supported services in the Healthy Families Program and to make technical and administrative adjustments to the agreement, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2005 through January 31, 2009. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.63 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to    C.63 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County an agreement with the State Department of Mental Health to pay the County an amount not to exceed $3,668,800 for Fiscal Years 2008/09 through 2011/12 for Contra Costa County’s specific Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Planning Estimate, and to sign an Assignment Agreement to assign Contra Costa County’s PEI Statewide Project Planning Estimate to the California Department of Mental Health (DMH) for the following PEI Statewide Projects: 1) Suicide Prevention; 2) Student Mental Health Initiative; and 3) Stigma and Discrimination Reduction. (No County match required)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreement between the County and the following parties as noted for the purchase of equipment and/or services:   C.64 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Ramon Berguer, M.D., effective September 1, 2008, to modify the payment provisions to add educational expense reimbursement with no change to the original payment limit of $910,000 and no change in the original term from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2009. (100% Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.65 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute a contract with Buck Consultants in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for consultation and coordination of the County’s Benefit Task Force Committee for the period July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. (Charges to Operating Departments)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover    C.66 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Youth Homes Inc., effective February 1, 2009, to increase the payment limit by $300,000 to a new payment limit of $1,250,000 to provide therapeutic behavioral services to additional clients, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, and to increase the automatic extension payment limit by $150,000 to a new payment limit of $625,000. (50% Federal Medi-Cal, 45% State Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment, 5% Mental Health Realignment)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.67 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute an increase to Purchase Order #23497 with Kent Oil Service Inc. on behalf of the Department of Public Works, in the amount of $397,212 to purchase asphaltic emulsion PMCRS-2H as specified for the 2009 Chip Seal Program. (100% Road Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.68 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute on behalf of the Department of Public Works, an increase to Purchase Order with Cooper Trucking in the amount of $250,950 for truck transport services for the 2009 Chip Seal Program. (100% Road Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.69 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute on behalf of the Department of Public Works, an increase to Purchase Order with George Reed Table Mountain Quarry in the amount of $225,000 to purchase aggregate for the 2009 Chip Seal Program. (100% Road Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho    District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.70 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute on behalf of the Department of Public Works, an increase to Purchase Order with Contract Sweeping Service in the amount of $146,985 for street sweeping required for the 2009 Chip Seal Program. (100% Road funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.71 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to issue a Request for Proposal for mandated Child Welfare Drug Testing Services in an amount not to exceed $300,000. (Budgeted: 30% County; 70% State Child Welfare Allocation)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.72 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Windrix Transcription, Inc., effective January 1, 2009, to increase the payment limit by $90,000 to a new payment limit of $165,000 to provide additional medical transcription services for Mental Health Divisions Outpatient Psychiatric services, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. (100% Mental Health Realignment Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.73 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Gloria H. Bentinck, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $235,000 to provide outpatient psychiatric services at the Adult Mental Health Outpatient Clinic for the period February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2010. (100% Mental Health Realignment)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.74 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Environmental Science Associates to extend the term from March 1 through November 1, 2009, with no change to the payment limit $284,659, to continue to provide services on the Bayview Residential Project Environmental Impact Report, and to amend the name Community Development Department to the Department of Conservation and Development. (100% Applicant fees)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.75 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Lori Salinas, MFT, effective February 1, 2009, to increase the payment by $44,000 to a new payment limit of $80,000 to provide additional Medi-Cal mental health specialty services, with no change in the original term July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2010. (100% Medi-Cal Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.76 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Ombudsman Services of Contra Costa, effective February 1, 2009, increasing the contract by $16,827 from $126,060 to a new payment limit of $142,887, with no change in the contract term of July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009 to provide Long Term Care Ombudsman Services to Seniors. (100% Federal)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.77 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Elizabeth A. Odumakinde, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $140,000 to provide professional hematology/oncology services for Contra Costa Health Plan members for the period February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2011. (100% Member Premiums)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.78 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Psychotherapy Institute of Individual, Family and Community Development, a corporation, effective February 1, 2009, to increase the payment limit by $17,636 to a new payment limit not to exceed $77,636 with no change in the term of March 1, 2008 through February 28, 2010, to provide additional court ordered Mental Health Services to Children and Family Services (CFS) clients who do not qualify for Medi-Cal Services. (100% County Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.79 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a novation contract with Seneca Residential and Day Treatment Center for Children in an amount not to exceed $2,035,047 to provide school and community based mental health services for seriously emotionally disturbed students in the Mt. Diablo Unified School District, for the period July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, with a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2009, in an amount not to exceed $1,017,523. (25% Federal Medi-Cal, 24% State Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment, 25% Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 26% Mount Diablo Unified School District)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.80 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to    C.80 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Aspira Technologies, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $500,000 to provide temporary Programmer/Analysts for the Department’s Information Systems Unit for the period April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010. (100% Enterprise I Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.81 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Meals on Wheels\Family and Community Services of Contra Costa (dba Senior Outreach Services), effective March 1, 2009, to increase the payment limit by $19,285 to a new payment limit of $292,457 to provide additional home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, and no change in the automatic extension through September 30, 2009 in an amount not to exceed $68,293. (100% Title III C (2) of the Older Americans Act of 1965)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.82 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Toyon Associates, Inc., effective January 1, 2009, to increase the payment limit by $40,000 to a new payment limit of $790,000 and to extend the term from June 30, 2009 through June 30, 2011 to provide additional consultation and technical assistance with regard to Medicare Prospective Payment System appeals. (Paid from Enterprise I Funds Commission)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.83 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to    C.83 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Amy E. Baba, DPM, effective January 1, 2009, to increase the payment limit by $11,000 to a new total of $206,000 to provide additional podiatry services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers, with no change in the original term of March 1, 2006 through February 28, 2009. (Enterprise I Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.84 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Preferred Staffing, Inc., effective July 1, 2008, to increase the payment limit by $6,623 to a new total of $56,623 for additional temporary nursing services at Contra Costa Regional Medical and Health Centers, with no change in the original term of August 1, 2007 through July 31, 2008. (Enterprise I Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.85 AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to purchase computer equipment and servers from Philips Medical Systems for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Emergency Department in the amount of $144,999. (100% Enterprise I Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.86 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Michael Sherman, M.D., Ph.D., (dba Contra Costa Oncology), in an amount not to exceed $140,000, to provide professional oncology services for Contra Costa Health Plan members for the period February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2011. (100% Enterprise II Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.87 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Louis Klein, M.D., Inc., in an amount not to exceed $340,000 to provide professional OB/GYN services for Contra Costa Health Plan members for the period February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2011. (100% Enterprise II Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.88 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Noel T.D. Chiu, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $120,000 to provide professional dermatology services for Contra Costa Health Plan members for the period February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2011. (100% Enterpirse II Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.89 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner to execute a contract with Michael G. Ross in an amount not to exceed $87,000 to provide administrative consulting services for the period January 1 through December 31, 2009. (100% County General Fund; Budgeted)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.90 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Information Officer, or designee, to execute a contract with Cost Control Associates Inc. (CCA) in an amount not to exceed $200,000 to provide cost recovery and reduction service for telephone (local, long distance and internet) and water services for the period of February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2013. (100% cost recovery)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.91 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute a contract amendment/extension with Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller and Naylor to extend the term from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009 with no increase in the payment limit for advice and legal representation on Indian Gaming issues, as recommended by the Legislation Committee.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Other Actions   C.92 ADOPT Resolution 2009/66 approving and authorizing the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to submit a Transportation Planning grant application to Caltrans for funds up to $300,000 for Fiscal Year 2009/10 for the purpose of developing the Knightsen-Byron Area Transportation Study, as recommended by the Transportation Water and Infrastructure Committee. (No impact to general fund; 20% required match will come from gas tax or Measure C funds and in-kind services/staff time)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.93 ACCEPT 2008 Annual Report submitted by the Contra Costa County Public Law Library, as recommended by the County Administrator.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.94 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/85 approving a Fifth Amendment to Master Pledge    C.94 ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/85 approving a Fifth Amendment to Master Pledge and Assignment Agreement related to the County's issuance of 2005 Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds to finance the Giant Road Family Apartments, San Pablo (No impact to General Fund).       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.95 APPROVE and ACCEPT the recommendation of the Lien Committee to reduce the County’s medical lien to $5,000 for medical care rendered to the minor child of Edward Castillo for treatment of injuries resulting from an automobile accident on May 26, 2007, as recommended by the County Administrator. (50% County General Fund, 50% State funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.96 REFER to the Internal Operations Committee for its July 2009 meeting the matter of updating the January 2006 Contra Costa Emergency Operations Plan for review, update, and recommendations, as recommended by Supervisor Uilkema.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.97 ACCEPT recommendation of the Fish and Wildlife Committee regarding the awarding of grants from the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund to the following organizations: (a) $1,163.40 to the Department of Conservation and Development for laboratory analysis associated with the Volunteer Creek Monitoring Program; and (b) $18,705 to the Urban Creeks Council for the Rheem Creek Restoration and Watershed Education Project at Contra Costa College in San Pablo. (No impact to general fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla    District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.98 ADOPT Resolution 2009/48 authorizing, on behalf of Pittsburg Unified School District, the sale and issuance of General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Series B, in a principal amount not to exceed $35,000,000, as recommended by the County Administrator. (No fiscal impact to the County)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.99 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Sheriff-Coroner, a purchase order with Allen Packaging Company in the amount of $125,000 to provide three-compartment trays for Seal-A-Meal food to be used at the West County, Martinez, and Marsh Creek Detention Facilities. (100% General Fund; Budgeted)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.100 CONTINUE the emergency action originally taken by the Board of Supervisors on November 16, 1999 regarding the issue of homelessness in Contra Costa County, as recommended by the Health Services Director.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.101 APPROVE the allocation of Keller Canyon mitigation funds in the amount of $1,000 to conduct a Grant Writing Seminar for the benefit of Keller Canyon applicants and other not-for-profit agencies serving East County, as recommended by Supervisor Glover.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Redevelopment Agency   C.102 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Redevelopment Director to execute the Purchase and Sale Agreement Between Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency and Richard B. Berrett and Geri L. Berrett, for property rights for Parcel 094-013-002 and AUTHORIZE payment in the amount of $390,000 in connection with the Orbisonia Heights Redevelopment Project, Bay Point Area. (100% Redevelopment funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.103 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Redevelopment Director to execute the Purchase and Sale Agreement between Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency and The Esther Stoneking Living Trust Dated December 18, 1989, Mary J. Dziedzic, Trustee, ACCEPT the Grant same, and authorize payment for property rights for Parcels 094-013-010 and 094-013-011 and AUTHORIZE payment in the amount of $500,000 in connection with the Orbisonia Heights Redevelopment Project, Bay Point Area. (100% Redevelopment funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia  District II Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema  District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho  District IV Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla  District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover   GENERAL INFORMATION The Board meets in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402, including as the Housing Authority and the Redevelopment Agency. Persons who wish to address the Board should complete the form provided for that purpose and furnish a copy of any written statement to the Clerk. All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Board to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Board or a member of the public prior to the time the Board votes on the motion to adopt. Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Chair calls for comments from those persons who are in support thereof or in opposition thereto. After persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and the matter is subject to discussion and action by the Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the Board of Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the Board of Supervisors can be submitted to the office of the Clerk of the Board via mail: Board of Supervisors, 651 Pine Street Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553; by fax: 925-335-1913; or via the County’s web page: www.co.contra-costa.ca.us, by clicking “Submit Public Comment” (the last bullet point in the left column under the title “Board of Supervisors.”) Requests for reconsideration of a land use (planning) decision must be submitted in writing to the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors within 10 days of the Board's decision, and must identify the new information which was not before the Board of Supervisors when the decision was made. The County will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Board meetings who contact the Clerk of the Board at least 24 hours before the meeting, at (925) 335-1900; TDD (925) 335-1915. An assistive listening device is available from the Clerk, Room 106. Copies of taped recordings of all or portions of a Board meeting may be purchased from the Clerk of the Board. Please telephone the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 335-1900, to make the necessary arrangements. Forms are available to anyone desiring to submit an inspirational thought nomination for inclusion on the Board Agenda. Forms may be obtained at the Office of the County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California. Applications for personal subscriptions to the weekly Board Agenda may be obtained by calling the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 335-1900. The weekly agenda may also be viewed on the County’s Internet Web Page: www.co.contra-costa.ca.us The Closed Session agenda is available each week upon request from the Office of the Clerk of the Board, 651 Pine Street, Room 106, Martinez, California, and may also be viewed on the County’s Web Page. STANDING COMMITTEES The Airport Committee (Supervisors Mary N. Piepho and Susan A. Bonilla) meets on the first Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. at Director of Airports Office, 550 Sally Ride Drive, Concord. The Family and Human Services Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and Gayle B. Uilkema) meets on the third Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Finance Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Susan A. Bonilla) meets on the first Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Gayle B. Uilkema and Mary N. Piepho) meets on the third Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Susan A. Bonilla and Mary N. Piepho) meets on the first The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Susan A. Bonilla and Mary N. Piepho) meets on the first Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Public Protection Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets on the first Monday of the month at 2:30 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (Supervisors Mary N. Piepho and Federal D. Glover) meets on the third Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. Airport Committee March 2, 2009 9:00 a.m. See above Family and Human Services Committee March 16,2009 1:00 p.m. See above Finance Committee March 2, 2009 1:00 p.m. See above Internal Operations Committee March 11,2009 10:30 a.m. See above Legislation Committee March 2, 2009 10:30 a.m. See above Public Protection Committee Transportation Water & Infrastructure March 2, 2009 March 30,2009 2:30 p.m. 10:30 p.m. See above See above AD HOC COMMITTEES Ad Hoc committees of the Board of Supervisors meet on an as-needed basis at the direction of the committee chair. Please contact the offices of the committee chairs for meeting times and information. Municipal Advisory Council Review Committee PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD MAY BE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES AGENDA DEADLINE: Thursday, 12 noon, 12 days before the Tuesday Board meetings. Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its Board of Supervisors meetings and written materials. Following is a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral presentations and written materials associated with Board meetings: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees AICP American Institute of Certified Planners AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BGO Better Government Ordinance BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCCPFD (ConFire) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CDBG Community Development Block Grant CFDA Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CIO Chief Information Officer COLA Cost of living adjustment ConFire (CCCPFD) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CPA Certified Public Accountant CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission dba doing business as EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District ECCFPD East Contra Costa Fire Protection District ECCRPC East Contra Costa Regional Planning Commission EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee EMS Emergency Medical Services EPSDT Early State Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Mental Health) et al. et alii (and others) FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency F&HS Family and Human Services Committee First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10) FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development HHS Department of Health and Human Services HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome HOV High Occupancy Vehicle HR Human Resources HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Inc. Incorporated IOC Internal Operations Committee ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LLC Limited Liability Company LLP Limited Liability Partnership Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1 LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse MAC Municipal Advisory Council MBE Minority Business Enterprise M.D. Medical Doctor M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist MIS Management Information System MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology O.D. Doctor of Optometry OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology RDA Redevelopment Agency RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposal RFQ Request For Qualifications RN Registered Nurse SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SRVRPC San Ramon Valley Regional Planning Commission SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TRE or TTE Trustee TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee VA Department of Veterans Affairs vs. versus (against) WAN Wide Area Network WBE Women Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT report on the results of the 2008 Countywide Combined Charities Campaign from Campaign Chair Joe Valentine, Employment and Human Services Department Director, and Silvano Marchesi, County Counsel. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The 2008 Contra Costa County Combined Charities Campaign ran from October 1 through October 31, 2008. A total of 1,297 county employees participated in this year's campaign, and their donations total $329,933.00. This is an increase over last year's donations of $326,797, which is especially noteworthy given this very difficult financial situation the country found itself during the time of the charity campaign. The participating charity federations associated with the campaign included Community Health Charities of California (the lead organization), Bay Are Black United Fund, Local Independent Charities, Earth Share of California, and United Way of the Bay Area. Substantial donations were APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 3-1676 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: PR.3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Joe Valentine, Employment & Human Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:2008 Contra Costa County Combined Charities Campaign Report BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) also accepted for several non-profit agencies managed by County departments and agencies that support activities and services for County residents. The attached tables reflect Disbursements of Campaign Donations, the Top Five Donor Departments, the Top Five Donor Departments Per Number of Employees, and the 2008 Department Campaign Coordinators. ATTACHMENTS Charity Campaign Tables Top Five Donor Departments Health Services $72,655 Employment & Human Services $67,223 Public Works $27,276 Sheriff-Coroner $21,606 Child Support Services $13,576 Top Five Donor Departments Per Employee Donating Human Resource $621 County Administrator $462 Clerk-Recorder $389 Child Support Services $377 Risk Management $333 Disbursements to Charitable Organizations of Campaign Donations Community Health Charities of California Bay Area Black United Fund Local Independent Charities Earth Share of California United Way of the Bay Area Donor Choice $39,502.00 $15,464.00 $69,948.00 $17,188.00 $63,538.00 $123,153.00 2008 Department Campaign Coordinators Name Department Patrick Bowen Agriculture Jan Millar Animal Services Pat Smyers Assessor Nancy Tourigny Auditor-Controller Patti Hofherr Building Inspection Louise Britton Child Support Services Jane Pennington Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Elaine Baird Clerk-Recorder's Office Barbara Melton Conservation and Development Camille Wilkinson Cooperative Extension Nancy Yee County Administrator's Office Noël Plummer County Counsel Dan Cabral District Attorney's Office/Public Administrator Kathy Duhaime DoIT Maria Velez Employment & Human Services Dan Yaworsky Fire Protection District Sara Holman General Services Jackie Peterson Health Services Joseph Villarreal Housing Authority Robbie White Human Resources Kate Sibley LAFCO Naomi Little Law Library Cia Court Library Administration Christine Pokorny Moraga-Orinda Fire Protection District Gene Williams Office of Revenue Collections Ed Benton/Jim Morphy Probation Department Donna Broussard Public Defender's Office Kevin Emigh Public Works Department Kevin Molander Retirement Office Penny Bailey Risk Management Jim Bickert Sheriff-Coroner's Office Suzette Madrid Supervisor Bonilla's Office Lynn Reichard Supervisor Glover's Office Terrance Cheung Supervisor John Gioia's Office Amy Prentice Supervisor Piepho's Office Stephen Dexter Supervisor Uilkema's Office Meredith Boeger Treasurer-Tax Collector Luinda Dayak Veterans Services APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Laura Case 521-7100 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: PR.2 To:Board of Supervisors From:Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Declaring February 23 through March 2, 2009 as Peace Corps Week ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution Resolution No. 2009/60 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2009/60 Declaring February 23 through March 2, 2009 as Peace Corps Week in Contra Costa County Whereas, the Peace Corps has become an enduring symbol of our nation's commitment to encourage progress, create opportunity, and expand development at the grass-roots level in the developing world; and Whereas, more than 195,00 Americans have served as Peace Corps Volunteers in 139 countries since 1961; and Whereas, over the past 48 years, 26,249 men and women from the State of California have responded to our nation's call to serve by joining the Peace Corps; and Whereas, Peace Corps Volunteers have made significant and lasting contributions around the work in agriculture, business development, information technology, education, health and HIV/AIDS, and the environment, and have improved the lives of individuals and communities around the world; and Whereas, Peace Corps Volunteers have strengthened the ties of friendship and understanding between the people of the United States and those of other countries; and Whereas, Peace Corps Volunteers, enriched by their experiences overseas, have brought their communities throughout the United States a deeper understanding of other cultures and traditions, thereby bringing a domestic dividend to our nation; and Whereas, it is indeed fitting to recognize the achievements of the Peace Corps and honor its Volunteers, past and present, and reaffirm our country's commitment to helping people help themselves throughout the world. that the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors does hereby proclaim February 23 through March 2, 2009, Peace Corps Week in Contra Costa County ___________________ SUSAN A. BONILLA Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA GAYLE B. UILKEMA District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ MARY N. PIEPHO FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy RECOMMENDATION(S): Adopt resolution commending John Muir Medical Center – Walnut Creek Campus for its outstanding performance in the Survival Measurement and Reporting Trial for Trauma study as evidenced by its high rating on the National Trauma Report Card issued by the American College of Surgeons. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the nation’s lead federal agency for research on health care quality, costs, outcomes, and patient safety, recently issued its report on “Survival Measurement and Reporting Trial for Trauma (SMARTT) putting John Muir Medical Center – Walnut Creek Campus among the top trauma centers in the country based on risk-adjusted patient outcome. The SMARTT study was based on trauma outcome data submitted by trauma APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Art Lathrop 646-4690 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Jacqueline Pigg, Barbara Borbon PR.4 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:John Muir Medical Center National Trauma Report Card BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) centers throughout the country to the American College of Surgeons’ National Trauma Databank and resulted in establishing a National Trauma Report Card rating trauma center performance. ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution Resolution No. 2009/67 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/24/2009 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2009/67 National Trauma Report Card issued to JOHN MUIR MEDICAL CENTER - WALNUT CREEK CAMPUS AS THE COUNTY’S LEVEL II TRAUMA CENTER WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors in 1986 established a comprehensive Trauma System and, following a competitive selection process and review, designated John Muir Medical Center - Walnut Creek Campus as the Level II Trauma Center for the County; and WHEREAS, John Muir Medical Center – Walnut Creek Campus continuously served as the County’s sole adult trauma center for the past twenty-three years; and WHEREAS, the commitment of John Muir Medical Center – Walnut Creek Campus including its physician, nursing and support staffs at its Walnut Creek campus to providing high quality trauma care to critically injured patients has been widely recognized throughout the community and by this Board; and WHEREAS, the quality of trauma care services provided by John Muir Medical Center – Walnut Creek Campus has recognized by the American College of Surgeons following recent audit undertaken at the request of John Muir Medical Center; and WHEREAS, John Muir Medical Center – Walnut Creek Campus has consistently submitted high quality trauma outcome data to the National Trauma Databank; and WHEREAS, John Muir Medical Center – Walnut Creek Campus was one of approximately 125 Level I and Level II trauma centers selected for inclusion in the Survival Measurement and Reporting Trial for Trauma (SMARTT) funded by the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Policy for the purposes of developing a National Trauma Report Card to benchmark trauma center quality on a risk-adjusted basis; and Contact: Art Lathrop 646-4690 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Jacqueline Pigg, Barbara Borbon WHEREAS, the Report Card issued by the American College of Surgeons based on this study showed John Muir Medical Center – Walnut Creek Campus as a “very-high quality hospital,” the highest ranking issued, in overall score and well above average in all areas of ranking; That the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County commends the efforts of the physicians, nurses, support staff and administration at John Muir Medical Center - Walnut Creek Campus whose commitment, contribution, professionalism, expertise and tireless participation, has resulted in the superior level of trauma care as recognized by the National Trauma Report Card. PASSED by a unanimous vote of the Board of Supervisors members present this 24th day of February 2009. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT attached Resolution 2009/ 1 proclaiming February 24, 2009, national "Spay Day USA 2009" in Contra Costa County and to observe and recognize responsible pet ownership and kindness to animals by encouraging the citizens of the County to have their pets spayed or neutered. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: "Spay Day USA" was organized by the Doris Day Animal Foundation in February 1995 to offer solutions for pet overpopulation. "Spay Day USA" takes place each year on the last Tuesday of February. "Spay Day USA" is America's first and only national day of action to promote the spaying or neutering of pets. During "Spay Day USA," veterinarians and their staff, animal welfare professionals, business owners, and citizens join forces nationwide to provide spay/neuter services and to promote spay/neuter as an essential component of good pet health care, as well as an effective and humane means of decreasing the euthanasia of homeless animals in shelters. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jan Millar (925) 335-8370 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: PR.1 To:Board of Supervisors From:Glenn E. Howell, Animal Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Proclaiming February 24, 2009, as "Spay Day USA 2009" ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution Resolution No. 2009/1 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2009/1 Proclaiming February 24, 2009 as "Spay Day USA 2009" WHEREAS, dogs and cats give companionship to and share the homes of over 71 million individuals in the United States; and WHEREAS, two unaltered cats and their offspring can produce 420,000 more cats in seven years and two unaltered dogs and their offspring can produce 67,000 more dogs in six years; and WHEREAS, humane societies and shelters euthanize an estimated four million dogs and cats each year, although many of them are healthy and adoptable, due to a lack of critical resources such as money, space, and good adoptive homes; and WHEREAS, the problem of companion animal overpopulation costs the taxpayers of this county millions of dollars annually through animal control programs aimed at coping with the millions of unwanted dogs and cats; and WHEREAS, spaying and neutering cats and dogs has been shown to drastically reduce cat and dog overpopulation; and WHEREAS, veterinarians, humane societies, national and local animal protection organizations, and private citizens have joined together again to advocate the spaying and neutering of companion animals on "Spay Day USA 2009." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the members of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa PROCLAIM and PRONOUNCE February 24, 2009 to be designated "Spay Day USA 2009." ___________________ SUSAN A. BONILLA Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA GAYLE B. UILKEMA District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ MARY N. PIEPHO FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy RECOMMENDATION(S): FISCAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: SD.1 To:Board of Supervisors From:COB Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION(S): FISCAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes:Matter of Record. No Action Taken. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: SD.2 To:Board of Supervisors From:COB Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Public Comment RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the naming of the Richmond Courthouse at 100 - 37th, Richmond, the “George D. Carroll Courthouse” and AUTHORIZE a joint County-Superior Court dedication of this renaming at the Richmond Courthouse at an appropriate time this year. FISCAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impacts BACKGROUND: Several Courthouses in the County are named after individuals, both living and deceased. The State of California recently decided to name the new East County Courthouse (funded and constructed by the State) the Richard E. Arnason Justice Center. Other county courthouses named after former judges, both living and deceased, are the Wakefield Taylor Courthouse, Spinetta Family Law Center, and the A.F. Bray Building. George D. Carroll was APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 510-374-3231 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: SD.3 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Naming the Richmond Courthouse as the "George D. Carroll Courthouse" BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) born in Brooklyn, New York, in 1923 and is a veteran of World War II. He started his legal career in the District Attorneys’ Office in Kings County (Brooklyn), New York. He moved to Contra Costa County in 1954 and continues to be a resident of Richmond to this day. Judge Carroll has provided outstanding and exemplary service to the people of Contra Costa County, and Western Contra Costa County in particular, over a long and distinguished career. Judge Carroll held prominent public positions from 1961 to 1985 and is a pioneer in advocating legal and political representation for persons of color in Contra Costa County. Judge Carroll achieved many “firsts” in his career. He was the first African-American to practice law in the City of Richmond. He was the first African-American elected to the Richmond City Council (serving from 1961 to 1965) and to be elected Mayor of Richmond (in 1964). He was also the first African-American mayor of a large American city. In 1965, he became the first African-American judge in Contra Costa County. Judge Carroll served on the bench of the Richmond Municipal Court from 1965 to 1977 and on the Bay Municipal Court from 1977 to his retirement in 1985. He served six terms as the Presiding Judge of the Bay Municipal Court. Judge Carroll was also a founding member of the Judicial Council of the National Bar Association (The nation's oldest and largest national association of predominately African American lawyers and judges) and a member of the Charles Houston Bar Association, California Judges Association, American Bar Association, American Judicature Society, World Association of Judges of the World Peace Through Law Center, Board of Governors of the United Bay Area Crusade, Richmond Boys’ Club, and the Neighborhood House of North Richmond. There are letters of support in favor of naming the Richmond Courthouse after Judge George Carroll from the following individuals and organizations: State Senator Mark DeSaulnier State Senator Loni Hancock Mary Ann O’Malley, Presiding Judge of the Contra Costa Superior Court David Coleman, Contra Costa Public Defender Robert Kochly, Contra Costa District Attorney National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) – Contra Costa Joshua Genser, former President of the Richmond Chamber of Commerce and lawyer in private practice in Richmond Richmond City Council unanimous resolution Black American Political Action Committee of Contra Costa Coumnty ATTACHMENTS Carroll Letters of Support RECOMMENDATION(S): OPEN the public hearing and ask if any notified property owners wish to be heard on the four items specified in Section II below. CLOSE public hearing. Following close of hearing, MAKE the findings and determinations required by Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.030 described in Section II below. FIND that acquisition of the subject property under Streets and Highways Code Section 760 will promote the interests of Contra Costa County (County) and that acquisition has been recommended in writing by State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans). ADOPT the attached Resolution of Necessity No. 2009/75 to acquire property by eminent domain. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Karen Laws, 313-2228 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: SD.4 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Condemnation of property for widening of State Route 4 from Loveridge Road to Somersville Road, Pittsburg area. (District V) Project No. 4660-6X4184 FISCAL IMPACT: In eminent domain actions, the judgment will be the price paid for the property and may include court costs. Under the terms of a previously approved Cooperative Agreement among the County, Caltrans, and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), the County will have no responsibility to pay any of the costs or expenses related to acquisition of the property. These costs will be paid by and have been or will be allocated between Caltrans and CCTA. BACKGROUND: State Route 4 (SR4) East is a vital east-west transportation corridor that provides direct access from East Contra Costa County west to the greater Bay Area and east to San Joaquin County. In 1985, Caltrans suggested widening SR4 to eight lanes to improve capacity and reduce congestion. In 1988, County voters passed a local sales tax measure to fund transportation projects of this type within the County. CCTA has been implementing a roadway widening program in stages, widening SR4 East to eight lanes from the Concord area to the proposed project area. The segment of the widening project that is the subject of this hearing consists of the widening and improving of SR4 East from west of Loveridge Road to west of Somersville Road, reconstruction of the Loveridge Road interchange, and replacement of the Century Boulevard over crossing. On June 27, 2006, the County approved the proposed project and adopted the certified Environmental Impact Report. Caltrans has been trying to acquire land from the affected property owners by negotiation for more than a year. Some properties have been acquired through negotiation. However, Caltrans has been unable to acquire all parcels needed for the project through negotiation, and now it is time to begin relocating utilities. The purpose of this hearing is to consider the necessity of acquiring six parcels along the entire project area. The land interest to be acquired includes fee title and easements. If the Resolution of Necessity is adopted, Caltrans may proceed to acquire these parcels through the use of eminent domain. Historically, acquisitions of real property for County road projects funded by CCTA have been handled by the Real Property Division of the County's Public Works Department. However, in 2004, Caltrans advised CCTA that it would like to participate in the acquisition process. In response to this request, CCTA agreed to have Caltrans assume responsibility for acquisition of the parcels involved in the Loveridge to Somersville project. Due to the cumbersome and time-consuming Caltrans procedures involved in adopting a Resolution of Necessity for Caltrans projects, Caltrans asked the County to consider entering into a Cooperative Agreement to allow Caltrans and the County to jointly exercise their powers of eminent domain pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.140 and Streets and Highways Code section 760. Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.140 allows two or more public agencies to enter into an agreement for the joint exercise of their powers of eminent domain. The Streets and Highways code section 760 provides that if a county Board of Supervisors determines by a four-fifths vote that acquisition under the statute will promote the interests of the county and the acquisition is recommended in writing by Caltrans, the Board of Supervisors, by a four-fifths vote may acquire property needed for State highway purposes. The statute allows the title to the property to be taken in the name of Caltrans. The only action required of the Board of Supervisors under the statute is to determine whether to adopt the Resolution of Necessity and make the required findings. After that is done, Caltrans may proceed to condemn the subject real property. By Cooperative Agreement dated August 1, 2006, the County agreed to consider adoption of one or more Resolutions of Necessity on behalf of Caltrans. The Cooperative Agreement requires Caltrans representatives to appear at the Resolution of Necessity hearings and present the proposed resolutions to the board. The Cooperative Agreement requires Caltrans and CCTA to use project funds to defend, indemnify, save, protect and hold harmless the County from loss damage or liability resulting from the County's actions under the agreement. On August 5, 2008, the County adopted Resolution of Necessity No. 2008/564 with respect to thirty-three parcels and on December 16, 2008, the County adopted Resolution of Necessity No. 2008/792 with respect to seventeen parcels on behalf of Caltrans. The proposed Resolution of Necessity will allow Caltrans to acquire six additional parcels within the project area, pursuant to the Cooperative Agreement and Streets and Highways Code Section 760, which are necessary for the project. Caltrans has represented to County staff that the following information is true and correct. I. Notice - Code of Civil Procedure section 1245.235 provides that the governing body of the public entity may adopt a Resolution of Necessity only after each person whose property is to be acquired by eminent domain, and whose name and address appears in the last equalized County Assessment Roll notice a reasonable opportunity to appear and be heard on the matters referred to in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.030. Caltrans represents that on October 27, 2008, Caltrans sent by first-class mail the required notice of the Board’s intent to adopt a Resolution of Necessity on December 16, 2008, at 9:30 a.m. in the Board of Supervisors’ chambers and notice of the opportunity to appear and be heard on the matters referred to in Code of Civil Procedure section 1240.030. II. Scope of Hearing Pursuant to Code Of Civil Procedure Section 1240.030 A. Public interest and necessity require the proposed project. SR4 is the only east-west transportation corridor in this area that provides direct access from Pittsburg, Antioch, and Brentwood to the greater Bay Area to the west and a link between Contra Costa County and San Joaquin County to the east. Traffic volume on the existing roadways is beyond system capacity due to development in East County. This has resulted in severe congestion and increased travel times. Further increases in traffic volume will result in gridlock not only in the freeway system, but also in the alternative local street network located near the congested freeway. B. The project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. The project was designed to have as little impact as possible to the residential sites situated mainly to the south of SR4. This required the balance of the acquisition to be applied to the businesses to the north of SR4. No households will require relocation; however, there will be temporary impacts for the length of the project. C. The properties sought to be acquired are necessary for the project. All of the properties that are the subject of this Resolution of Necessity are directly related to the widening of SR4. D. The offer of compensation required by section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the owner or owners of record. Caltrans made offers of compensation required by Government Code section 7267.2, based on appraisals of fair market value prepared by or on behalf of Caltrans in accordance with standard Caltrans practices, and approved by Caltrans's Deputy District Director, Right of Way, District 4. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: CalTrans will not be able to acquire the property righs necessary for the project. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2009/75 Official Resolution THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/24/2009 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2009/75 See attached Resolution that was a specific requirement form from the State. Contact: Karen Laws, 313-2228 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): HEARING to adopt Resolution No. 2009/55 accepting tabulation of mail-in ballots, confirming the Engineer's Report and authorizing the levy of street light charges to operate and maintain facilities and services for Minor Subdivision 06-0016. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact to the County General Fund. All cost will be covered with revenue from County Service Area (CSA) L-100 (100%). BACKGROUND: CSA L-100 was formed pursuant to the County Service Area Law to ensure the proper flow of funds for the ongoing operation, maintenance and servicing of street lighting in the public right-of-way throughout unincorporated Contra Costa County. Each year thereafter an annual Engineer’s Report has been prepared and approved, an annual assessment has been levied on the parcels within CSA L-100, and as a condition of approval as properties develop, they have been required to annex into CSA L-100. In order to annex property into CSA L-100, property owners must vote to approve the annexation. Article APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Michelle Parella, 313-2286 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: SD.5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:HEARING to adopt Resolution No. 2009/55 accepting tabulation of mail-in ballots for Minor Subdivision 06-0016 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218) provides that any new assessment may not be approved if it is opposed by a majority of the property owners voting on the proposed assessment. The Board Order and Resolution comply with the requirements for new assessments under Proposition 218. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without Board of Supervisors’ approval, this project will not be in compliance with the Conditions of Approval for Minor Subdivision 06-0016 and an alternative means to finance street lighting within the public right of way would have to be found. CLERK'S ADDENDUM CLOSED the hearing; ADOPTED Resolution No. 2009/55 accepting tabulation of mail-in ballots, confirming the Engineer's Report and authorizing the levy of street light charges to operate and maintain facilities and services for Minor Subdivision 06-0016. ATTACHMENTS Ballot Resolution No. 2009/55 Proposed Annexation MS 06-0016 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/24/2009 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2009/55 In The Matter Of: HEARING to ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/55 accepting tabulation of mail-in ballots, confirming the Engineer’s Report, and authorizing the levy of street light charges to operate and maintain facilities and services for Minor Subdivision 06-0016, Lafayette area. (County Service Area L-100 Funds) (District II) Project No.:7394-6X5001 Whereas: The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES: 1. In accordance with California Government Code 25210.82, on January 6, 2009, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2009/9 accepting an Engineer’s Report for street light charges for County Service Area L-100 (CSA L-100), which included the exterior boundaries of the territory proposed for annexation. 2. Resolution No. 2009/9 also declared the Board’s intention to levy and collect street light charges to operate and maintain facilities and services within CSA L-100 for Fiscal Year 2008/2009 and set a public hearing for February 24, 2009. Notice of the hearing was given in the time and manner required by law. 3. Notices and ballots have been mailed to the property owner of record as required by Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218), and the returned ballots are ready to be tabulated. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board FINDS, DETERMINES and RESOLVES that: Contact: Michelle Parella, 313-2286 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: 1. A public hearing was held before this Board on February 24, 2009, at 9:30 a.m. At the hearing, the Engineer of Work presented to the Board all ballots received from property owners within Minor Subdivision 06-0016. The Board heard and considered all protests against the proposed assessments and tabulated the returned ballots according to the proportional financial obligation of the affected properties. The Board also afforded to every interested person an opportunity to make a protest to the Engineer’s Report, either in writing or orally, and the Board considered each protest. 2. A majority protest, as defined in Section 4 (e) of Article XIIID of the California Constitution and Section 25210.84 of the Government Code, does not exist. 3. The Board hereby approves the proposed annexation of Minor Subdivision 06-0016, confirms the diagram and assessment as set forth in the Engineer’s Report, and authorizes the levy of the street light charges for fiscal year 2008/2009 to be collected on the tax rolls. Public Works Department 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez DATE: February 24, 2009 TO: Board of Supervisors FROM: Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Results of the Ballots Cast in the Proposed Annexation of in Minor Subdivision 06-0016 into CSA L-100 I, Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director for the County of Contra Costa, State of California, having canvassed the return of all votes cast in the proposed annexation of Minor Subdivision 06-0016 into County Service Area L-100 Lighting District held on February 24, 2009 do hereby certify the following to be a full, true and correct Statement of Results of all votes cast on the following measure: County Service Area L-100 Lighting District Annexation and Annual Assessment for Minor Subdivision 06-0016 Yes No I further certify that the total number of ballots cast in the proposed annexation of Minor Subdivision 06-0016 into County Service Area L-100 Lighting District at said election was ________ and attached hereto are the total ballots received for and against annexation and assessment. Resolution No. AIR-443   Deliberation BOS Agenda Meeting Date:02/24/2009 Time (Duration):15 Minutes   Review of Environmental Health Program Regulations, Standards, and Policies  Submitted For: William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director  Department:Health Services Noticed Public Hearing: No Official Body: Board of Supervisors Presenter/Phone, if applicable: Sherman Quinlan, 646-5225 Audio-Visual Needs: Handling Instructions: District: All Districts Contact, Phone: Sherman Quinlan 646-5225 Recommendation(s): 1. ACCEPT report on the Health Services Department Environmental Health Program describing actions taken to address problems and opportunities for improvement identified in Internal Operations Committee discussions. 2. ACCEPT the Health Services Director’s report regarding methods to expedite regulatory inspections and approvals for those customers willing to pay a premium for special processing. 3. ACCEPT the Environmental Health Director’s press release and commitment to make presentations to local chambers of commerce and cities to communicate changes and improvements to inspection and follow-up services. 4. ACCEPT the Health Services Director’s 10-minute presentation to the Board of Supervisors, featuring the improvements summarized in the December 8, 2008 Internal Operations Committee report. 5. REQUEST the Health Services Director to make a follow-up report to the Internal Operations Committee in August, 2009. Fiscal Impact: No fiscal impact. Background: In January 2008, the Board of Supervisors referred to the Internal Operations Committee a review of Health Services Department – Environmental Health Program standards and policies to promote a better understanding of the applicable regulations and inspection and follow-up processes, and to identify opportunities, if any, to streamlines those processes. The Internal Operations Committee held discussions of this matter on April 14, May 12, August 11, and December 8, 2008, providing an opportunity during the intervening periods for the Environmental Health Division to meet individually with local businesses to flesh out and resolve issues that were raised on April 14. A sampling of the issues raised on April 14 included alleged inconsistencies in the application of regulations and codes, increases in requirements of applicants from one inspection to the next, disagreements over interpretations of regulations, protracted period of time to get final approval for a permit, outdated forms, frustration with perceived bureaucracy, and dissatisfaction with perceived lack of communication. The discussions were very enlightening for all parties concerned with the issues. Some of the operational issues causing so much consternation were determined to be a result of understaffing, which has been remedied through the hiring of three additional plan checkers. Many other issues were determined to be the result of a mismatch in the business community’s expectations regarding the County’s authority to waive or bend regulations. Environmental Health was able to meet separately with most of the community members who wanted to meet. The meetings were generally positive and many issues were resolved or at least a common set of expectations was achieved. The changes implemented by the Environmental Health Division include: a. Actively promoting pre-project design consultation meetings with sign-off by an Environmental Health official. b. Adopted internal policies on subjective regulations and provided 40 hours of additional staff training to improve consistency and uniformity in the application of internal and external regulations. c. Increased public access to key staff to resolve problems; established a process that facilitates the principles coming together on set-aside days to triage problems. d. Developed a compliance checklist that can be provided to report the progress of a project, and why a project may have stalled. e. Implemented desk-duty narratives to document customer conferences on project issues. f. Launched a new public website that provides on line project tracking. (In the two months since the pages have been up, there have been 541 visits to the main Plan Check page; 242 visits to the FAQ page and 219 visits to the page where people can track the status of their application. A month-old “Contact Us” page has been visited 219 times. g. Updated Division forms and literature to be consistent with California Retail Food Code requirements. h. Modified the public service area at Environmental Health to be more customer friendly by increasing lobby and counter space. i. Utilized the Statewide Technical Advisory Committee on Environmental Health to increase consistency on subjective regulations. j. Published an updated and refurbished “Plan Check Construction Guidelines for New and Remodeled Food Facilities, Swimming Pools, and Spas” handbook. Since the December 8, 2008 report to the Board of Supervisors, the Environmental Health Division has surveyed the other Bay Area Counties regarding expedited plan reviews. Only three of the eight counties allow this practice. In fairness to all constituents, regardless of their ability to pay higher fees, the Environmental Health Division believes it is better to handle all plan reviews expeditiously based on dates of submission. The Environmental Health Division issued a press release on December 11, 2008 regarding improvements to plan review process. The Environmental Health Division is committed to presenting information on these improvements in our plan review process for chambers of commerce and cities within Contra Costa County. The Health Services Department and its Environmental Health Division appreciate the support of the Board of Supervisors and its Internal Operations Committee in the ongoing effort to protect and promote the health of the people of Contra Costa County. The Environmental Health Division will make a follow-up report to the Internal Operations Committee in August, 2009, as requested. Budget Information Information about available funds Budgeted: Funds Available: Adjustment: Amount Available: Unbudgeted: Funds NOT Available: Amendment: Account Code(s) for Available Funds 1: Fund Transfers Attachments Letter Agreement Minutes Attachments No file(s) attached. RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT report regarding the mid-year status of the 2008/09 County Budget, the Department Head Summit, the State Budget, and the Economic Stimulus Package; and DIRECT the Auditor-Controller to suspend transfers to the Workers' Compensation Internal Services Fund for May and June. FISCAL IMPACT: This report is informational and will be used for planning purposes and budget development. Additional recommendations will be presented to the Board during Budget Hearings on March 17, 2009. BACKGROUND: The Administrator’s Office annually reports the status of the Budget as of December 31 to determine whether departmental expenses and revenues to date are consistent with the spending plan adopted, and – in a normal year – amended from time to time, by the Board of Supervisors. Normally, mid-year reviews provide an opportunity to identify variances from anticipated expenditures and revenue receipts, and permit budget staff to confer with departments regarding the potential need for budgetary adjustments. This has not been a normal year. The Board of Supervisors has already taken action to reduce the County and Special District Budgets by over $90 million. The following is a summary of those actions (all reports are available on the internet APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes:Soren Chernell, Community Clinic Consortium; Mariana Moore, Contractors Alliance of Contra Costa; Rollie Katz, Public Employees’ Union Local One. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.2 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:FY 2008-09 MID-YEAR BUDGET STATUS REPORT AND DEPARTMENT HEAD SUMMIT REPORT BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) www.co.contra-costa.ca.us under Budget Documents): On May 6, 2008, the Board of Supervisors adopted a FY 2008/09 budget that included over $52 million in General Fund reductions in over $55 million in local cuts to baseline services. On August 12, 2008, the Board of Supervisors received a report stating that anticipated assessed valuation had dropped from a projected 4% to 0.21% countywide. The lack of growth in assessed valuations translated to loss of anticipated General Fund revenue in the current year of $6.6 million included in over $12 million in Countywide loss from property tax revenue. The County Administrator was directed to return to the Board with rebalancing solutions. On October 7, 2008, the Board discussed a rebalancing report that had been forwarded from the Finance Committee. The Board agreed that the economic picture was not likely to improve in the short-term and requested that the County Administrator return with recommendations and appropriation adjustments to balance the local budget shortfall by spreading reductions evenly among agencies without the use of reserves. On October 28, 2008, the Board met and adopted recommended FY 2008/09 local departmental cuts in the following funds/amounts: General Fund Reduction of $7.6 million ($6.6 property tax, $1.0 supplemental), Library Fund reduction of $0.8 million, Contra Costa County Fire Protection District reduction of $3.5 million, and East Contra Costa County Fire Protection District reduction of $1.4 million. Additionally, due to further economic uncertainty, the County Administrator recommended and the Board authorized the Auditor-Controller to reduce the General Fund Reserve Designation by $10,000,000; and to transfer those funds to an appropriation for contingency. In effect, this action ‘budgeted’ $10,000,000 of one-time reserves in the current fiscal year budget. This action was recommended in case of further loss of General Fund revenue and was not to be construed as a cushion for any known problems. The plan was for the County Administrator to continue to work with departments throughout the year to achieve balanced year-end expenditures. The report ended with the direction that staff would return to the Board with final State funding reductions and plans to implement a no-growth FY 2009/10 budget. It was anticipated that a no-growth budget would include significant additional reductions for increased cost of doing business outside the County’s control. On November 18, 2008, the Board of Supervisor held a Budget Rebalancing/State Budget Workshop to discuss pending impacts on the FY 2008/09 Budget. The County Administrator presented cost reduction options to rebalance the FY 2008/09 Budget to reflect state cuts and other revenue loss; and requested direction on additional action to be taken. The options presented would rebalance the FY 2008/09 Budget to reflect the known impact of State cuts and other local economic impacts on Employment and Human Services. The County Administrator also requested Board direction regarding further action to be taken. The Board directed the County Administrator to return in December with specific balancing plans to address these losses and identify options for the possible saving of two specific programs – Adoptions and Foster Care Licensing. At the conclusion of the presentation, the County Administrator noted that the recommendations merely realigned the budget for the cuts to programs already known. The reductions made no progress in addressing the $28 billion looming State deficit, were not sufficient to balance the County budget, and additional reduction recommendations would be presented in January. On December 9, 2008, the County Administrator returned to the Board with specific budget balancing recommendations, including alternatives to eliminating the Adoptions and Foster Care Licensing Programs. At the conclusion of the staff report, the Board received several hours of testimony from employees and members of the public who had received services from the County. The Board acknowledged the irony that because the County exists primarily to serve the most vulnerable populations, cuts in services necessarily impact the most vulnerable populations. Our County’s problems are not unique in this respect, but indicative of local governments nationwide. The Board members expressed their anguish over the proposed cuts and acknowledged the sobering truth that additional local cuts would yet be necessary in order to address diminishing revenues and new trickle-down impacts from state and federal budget balancing initiatives. Staff was directed to work particularly with the Employment and Human Services Department to evaluate all cost savings possibilities to mitigate future budget reductions. However, the Board emphasized that every available dollar would be needed in all County departments and programs to address future reductions. The Board adopted over $20 million in General Fund reductions included in over $22 million in total funding reductions to adjust for the impact of State and other local revenue losses and directed the County Administrator to return with a lay-off resolution necessary to implement the reductions. On December 16, 2008, the Board of Supervisors adopted a lay-off resolution with lay-offs effective December 31, 2008. The resolution authorized the deletion of certain positions in affected County departments, as approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 9, 2008. The Board authorized the Human Resources Department to implement the Tactical Employment Team Program (TETP), whose objective was to mitigate the negative impact that anticipated layoffs would have on County employees. The Board also directed the County Administrator to return to the Board with additional information regarding short- and long-term options originally presented to the Board on October 7, 2008, and a report from the County Assessor on property assessment activity. Finally, the Board again acknowledged that further State reductions and economic impacts would require subsequent adjustments to the FY 2008/09 Budget. On January 20, 2009, the Board of Supervisors accepted a report regarding national and local economic impacts on Contra Costa County and acknowledged that the County Administrator had scheduled a Department Head Summit for January 30. In summary, the report noted the importance of the Board and community receiving local and national economic impact information in the context of potential impacts on services to Contra Costa County residents. It was noted that the magnitude of loss of revenue and increased service level demand in Contra Costa is more easily understood in the context of the national and local economy. The report projected a current year budget gap of $30 million and a FY 2009/10 gap of an additional $26 million. For a variety of reasons including the economic situation and the magnitude of the County’s problem ($56 million), the County Administrator recommended developing a two year budget for fiscal years 2009/10 and 2010/11. It was anticipated that the budget would be adopted in early spring with program reductions and lay-offs effective in the current fiscal year. The report ended by noting that every attempt would be made during current labor negotiations to achieve savings to salvage services and jobs in Contra Costa. On February 3, 2009, the Board of Supervisors declared its intent to adopt a FY 2009/10 General Fund budget that balances annual expenses and revenues; acknowledged that the known budget gap of over $56 million represents significant service reductions to our citizens and is in addition to the $90 million in reductions already made in the current fiscal year; acknowledged that the County Administrator held a Department Head Summit on January 30 to develop a strategy for dealing with the current budget crisis, the budget crisis over the next two years, and for weathering the storm and coming out of this stronger, and better able to serve our constituents; directed the County Administrator to return to the Board with a 'Summit Report' on February 24; affirmed the Board’s commitment to defining the County’s budget/core service policy on March 3; directed Department Heads to work closely with the County Administrator to achieve reduced net County costs pursuant to Board policy; directed Departments, in cooperation with Labor Relations, to begin the meet and confer process with employee representatives regarding the impact of potential program reductions on the terms and conditions of employment for affected employees; directed the County Administrator to return to the Board March 17 with a FY 2009/10 Recommended Budget that meets the above requirements; and designated Tuesday, March 17 for FY 2009/10 budget hearings (including Bielenson hearings if needed); and Tuesday, March 31 for adoption of the FY 2009/10 County and Special District Budgets. Mid-Year Report Discussion Normally, the mid-year budget status report is important in that it is based on a sufficient amount of experience during the budget year to permit a reasonably accurate assessment of how closely actual expenses and revenues are likely to track with the approved budget. Our review of departmental budgets at this mid-year juncture suggests that departmental expenditures and revenues are performing substantially in accord with expectations and are projected to exceed the FY 2008/09 Adjusted Budget. However, as noted later in this report, there are several large variables which are affecting this projection. The Board is not being asked to take any corrective action at this time. Recommendations will be made as part of the Budget Hearings on March 17. This assessment could change based on intervening factors – e.g., revenue curtailments or program shifts by the State – that could affect current year costs and revenues and further substantially impact in a negative way our outlook for the ensuing fiscal year. This report provides an overview of the status of the County’s FY 2008/2009 Budget as of December 31, 2008. Included in this report are tables that summarize the County’s General Fund mid-year fiscal condition (Attachments A, B, and C). The County’s implementation of its Board-approved FY 2008/09 adjusted spending plan is proceeding as anticipated; however a significant deficit remains. As of December 31, 2008, with 50% of the fiscal year having passed, actual expenditures for all County funds totaled 45.6% of planned spending, while actual revenues totaled 43.6% of amounts anticipated for the year. These figures compare unfavorably to 44.5% and 47.9% respectively for the same period last year and even more negatively when compared to the same period in fiscal year 2006/07 (43.8% and 45.5% respectively) and 2005/06 (42.6% and 44.2% respectively). For the General Fund alone, actual expenditures totaled 50.1% of planned spending, and actual revenues totaled 37.7% of amounts anticipated for the year. As with all funds, these figures compare chiefly unfavorably to 47.5% and 39.0% respectively for the same period last year and when compared to the same period in fiscal year 2006/07 (47.0% and 39.7% respectively) and 2005/06 (46.4% and 38.6% respectively). Mid-year actual figures reflect not just continued tightening budgets but deficit spending. The specific dollar amounts were as follows: ALL FUNDS Second Quarter Summary Budget Actual Percent Expenditures $ 2,222,897,906 $ 1,012,714,358 45.6% Revenues $ 2,079,486,366 $ 905,663,493 43.6% GENERAL FUND Second Quarter Summary Budget Actual Percent Expenditures $ 1,273,535,308 $ 638,474,937 50.1% Revenues $ 1,248,034,742 $ 470,905,502 37.7% GENERAL FUND Second Quarter Expenditure Summary Budget Actual Percent Wages & Benefits $ 695,636,829 $ 343,730,270 49.4% Services & Supplies 444,460,163 192,510,103 43.3% Other Charges 266,001,156 137,726,553 51.8% Fixed Assets 25,311,662 8,077,885 31.9% Inter-departmental Charges (167,874,502)(43,569,874)26.0% Contingencies 10,000,000 0 0.0% Total Expenses $ 1,273,535,308 $ 638,474,937 50.1% GENERAL FUND Second Quarter Revenue Summary Budget Actual Percent Taxes $ 312,485,671 $ 188,195,363 60.2% Licenses, Permits, Franchises 15,415,340 3,219,441 20.9% Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties 14,684,786 2,403,100 16.4% Use of Money & Property 6,281,302 4,340,648 69.1% Federal/State Assistance 595,108,515 158,988,060 26.7% Charges for Current Svcs 194,359,923 75,865,789 39.0% Other Revenue 109,699,205 37,893,101 34.5% Total Revenues $ 1,248,034,742 $ 470,905,502 37.7% As noted above, County expenditures and revenues at mid-year were outside of acceptable parameters given the Board approved budget. The difference between budgeted expenditures and revenues are due to prior year encumbrances, restricted reserves, and other carry forwards. The variances in anticipated expenses and revenue receipts are noted at the mid-year; the majority of this variance was anticipated due to the local and national economy. Revenues Revenue from State and federal sources are typically late in being realized because much of it is based on expenditure claims paid in arrears. Normally departments that rely on State and Federal revenue experience a two-to three-month lag in revenues. Recent State actions have significantly increased these delays. As expected cash-flow and interest income have been impacted due to the State’s delay in payments. The direct impact on revenue for fiscal year 2008/09 thus far has been the posting of negative interest to the General Fund due to lack of cash. This was exacerbated by the County’s inability to sell tax revenue anticipation notes (TRANs) this year. Expenditures Normally salary costs are understated at mid-year. Unanticipated vacant positions lessen salary costs, though vacancy savings continue to lag behind prior years. Some reduction in permanent salary costs is anticipated in the second half of the fiscal year due to retirements, which tend to occur in March, however, the majority of this savings is spent in retiree pay-outs. The most significant savings are anticipated to come from the May 1 lay-offs. The most notable exceptional salary savings will be approximately $5.0 million from the recommended suspension of the May and June Workers’ Compensation trust transfers should this recommendation be approved. The Workers’ Compensation trust is significantly above the County’s established minimum funding level of 80% and will remain so given this recommendation. Employee benefit costs are understated at mid-year because the budget includes appropriations for health insurance cost increases that did not become effective until the end of the second quarter, December 31, 2008. Actual expenses for employee health insurance will increase the second half of the year and will exceed budget amounts as these increases were not budgeted. Service and supplies costs are generally understated throughout most of the fiscal year because of the time required to process payments to vendors and contractors. This payment cycle averages one month in arrears. Additionally, in very tight fiscal years – as this one is – departments tend to wait later in the year to make purchases to ensure that resources are not needed elsewhere. General Purpose Revenue General Purpose budgeted revenues, adjusted October 2008, total $349 million spread over approximately 50 accounts. It consists primarily of $292.0 million in taxes for current property. Of the taxes for current property, $171.2 million is current secured, $5 million is supplemental, $5.2 million is unitary, $104.5 million is Property Tax in Lieu of Vehicle License Fees (from non-realignment vehicle license fees) and $5.9 million is current unsecured. Other significant budgeted revenue is real property transfer tax ($5.5 million), supplemental roll changes ($4 million), sales tax ($13.0 million), and interest income ($5 million). Based on six months of experience, General Purpose Revenues are not expected to meet budgeted levels. This projection is contingent upon several significant factors. All of these factors are affected by the housing market – the most significant being Proposition 8 reassessments and prior year adjustments. Additionally, State delays of payment will negatively impact interest earnings. It is quite possible that interest earnings for the General Fund will end the year in the red. In Summary, the over-all County General Fund budget is not balanced, the following four departments are currently projected to exceed their General Fund allocations: Conflict Defense The County’s contract with the Contra Costa County Bar Association is projected to exceed its General Fund allocation by $2.1 million. This deficit is attributed to the ever increasing number of capital cases and the complexity of those cases. This program is 100% funded by the General Fund and will not be balanced in the current year. District Attorney The County Administrator continues to project a budget shortfall in the Office of the District Attorney in the amount of $2.1 million. This shortfall is above the ‘soft landing allocation’ of $600,000 extended to the District Attorney for the current fiscal year. The District Attorney's budget continues to be affected by significant exposure to state and local revenue reductions and unforeseen retirement buyback conversions. In addition to State revenue reductions implemented by the Board on December 16, 2008, two Anti-Gang grants totaling $287,920 may be abolished by the State in the current fiscal year; Proposition 172 and sales tax realignment funding shortfalls are projected to be $851,068 and $21,415 respectively; and city prosecution contract revenue has been reduced by $164,803 due to cities cancelling and reducing services. Salaries and benefits costs are projected to be $1,171,209 over budget due to unforeseen retirement buyback expenses totaling $557,276 through December and a combined overrun of $410,423 in temporary salary and permanent overtime costs. Temporary salary costs have increased as the department has made use of temporary positions as a cost savings measure in an attempt to preserve service levels. The District Attorney has pro-actively submitted a corrective action plan to mitigate $1,361,523 of the projected current year shortfall, although the County Administrator can only recommend supporting the use of $670,118 of the proposal. Due to the magnitude of the shortfall entering fiscal year 2009/10, immediate layoffs or a substantial increase in the general fund allocation to the department is recommended to establish a sustainable base of services for the foreseeable future. Taking into account the projected timetable for economic recovery on the federal, state, and local levels, continuing to deplete one-time funding sources is not a viable solution. Employment and Human Services (EHSD) The County Administrator and EHSD are projecting a $6.4 million deficit over the identified Budget Rebalancing package which was approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 9, 2008. The rebalancing plan approved by the Board did not include an estimated $6.5 million for In Home Supportive Services (IHSS). The estimated over expenditures results from a combination of salary increases granted in the collective bargaining agreement between IHSS Public Authority and the SEIU United Health Care Workers West and an increase in the number of clients and hours of service. The costs associated with these increases were never actually appropriated into EHSD’s Budget. EHSD staff anticipates that the department will end the year with a deficit of $6.4 million due to IHSS and a slight savings from workers’ compensation. In an attempt to mitigate the anticipated over expenditure, all purchases, hires, and expenditures of any kind are being closely monitored. Additionally, County Administrator staff is working with the department on a rebalancing plan. Health Services The County Administrator and Health Services Department had projected a budget shortfall in the Health Services Department in the amount of $4 million, due to projected contractual savings that have not materialized. Through a herculean effort, the Health Services Department has implemented a corrective action plan, which includes restructuring the ambulatory care delivery system, securing additional grant funds through the Coverage Initiative (Federal), receiving final approval for a Health Plan intergovernmental transfer, and streamlining the system through reclassification and other personnel items. The Department and County Administrator are projecting a balanced budget for Health Services. Sheriff-Coroner The County Administrator continues to project a budget shortfall in the Office of the Sheriff in the amount of $3,000,000. This shortfall is acceptable based on the $5,000,000 ‘soft landing allocation’ extended to the Sheriff for the current fiscal year. The Sheriff has been working diligently to identify opportunities for increased revenue and additional cost savings measures, several of which have been implemented. Lower than expected attrition and significant shortfalls in Proposition 172 funding have made it difficult to achieve the structural balance needed to enter fiscal year 2009/10 at a sustainable level. Additional reductions will be necessary to balance the department's fiscal year 2009/10 operational budget due to further reductions in local revenue and the expiration of one-time revenue sources used to balance the current year budget. The Sheriff continues to make regular status reports to the Public Protection Committee regarding progress in analyzing impacts to services provided by the department. Due to the magnitude of the shortfall entering fiscal year 2009/10, immediate layoffs or a substantial increase in the general fund allocation to the department is recommended to establish a sustainable base of services for the foreseeable future. Taking into account the projected timetable for economic recovery on the federal, state, and local levels, continuing to deplete one-time funding sources is not a viable solution. Library and Special Districts Reductions in property taxes and other related revenues have impacted many of the County’s Special Districts and the County Library Fund. East Contra Costa Fire Protection District The East Contra Costa Fire Protection District’s general operating fund is projected to have a net fund cost of $194,000 this fiscal year. The District began the year with $6.4 million in reserves and will end the year with $6.2 million. Original projections had been worse however the District has addressed part of the property tax revenue problem by postponing remodels that had been scheduled for older stations. Preliminary revenue estimates suggest that in excess of $1.7 million will be spent in fiscal year 2009/10. Contra Costa County Fire Protection District The Contra Costa County Fire Protection District’s general operating fund is projected to have a net fund cost of $5.8 million this fiscal year. The District began the year with $18.9 million in reserves and will end the year with $13.1 million. Preliminary revenue estimates suggest that in excess of $7.9 million will be spent in fiscal year 2009/10. Given no operational changes, this would leave the District with only $5.2 million in reserves. The District is aware that the economy is not expected to improve dramatically by June 2010 and has begun developing a plan for the FY 2009/10 budget. Library The Contra Costa County Library’s general operating fund is projected to have a net fund cost of $3.5 million this fiscal year. The Library began the year with $10.3 million in reserves and will end the year with $6.8 million. In fiscal year 2009/10 the Library is adjusting operating expenditures to meet the estimated revenue levels, however they do anticipate using approximately $1.7 million in designated reserves for capital and equipment automation expenditures. The estimated gross fund balance for June 30, 2010 is $5.1 million. CONCLUSION OF MID-YEAR STATUS There are no simple solutions. As noted, the overall General Fund budget is not balanced and is expected to exceed budgeted amounts at year end by approximately $26 million (down from the projected $30 million due to the Hospital Enterprise Fund corrective actions). A hiring freeze has been implemented to achieve a current year savings and to fix seniority lists in anticipation of lay-offs scheduled for May 1. Additionally, the County Administrator has recommended that fiscal year 2009/10 reductions be made immediately after adoption of the local budget and no later than April 1, 2009. These actions will help improve fund balance this fiscal year. In the next few months, the County will face massive fiscal challenges both locally, from the State, and quite possibly connected with the Federal Economic Stimulus Package. The development of the State budget is being closely followed by fiscal staff throughout the County. The first impact of payment delays announced by the State Controller began last Friday, February 13th when payments for many social services programs were not paid. Some counties are taking action to sue the Controller with Sacramento County leading this effort. CSAC has provided language to the Department of Finance which would require the state to repay counties for any delay by the State Controller by April 30th but there has been no response to the proposed language from Finance. Furthermore, County department heads have been provided 2009/10 budget direction that includes significant County cost reductions necessary to address declines in local County revenue. Due to timing of the County and State budgets, the fiscal year 2009/10 budget will likely be presented in two phases. Phase one will address the local problem and phase two will address State budget impacts. Fiscal year 2009/10 phase one budget hearings are scheduled for March 17 with adoption of phase one scheduled for March 31. Phase two will be scheduled once State Budget details/impacts are known. Department Head Summit The County Administrator hosted a Department Head Summit at the end of January to begin to address current and future budget and service issues. In preparation for the Summit, Department heads were asked to solicit from their employees ideas to streamline operations, and develop a catalog of core services for the County. The County Administrator stated that, although likely to be painful, a solution to our structural imbalances must and would be found. The purpose of the Summit was not only to develop a strategy for dealing with the current and future budget crisis, but additionally to determine how the County can position itself to weather the storm and come out of this stronger, and better able to serve our constituents. The Department Heads were very engaged in the Summit discussions and represented the myriad services provided by the County and the varying levels General Fund dependence. Discussions were lively and reflected various viewpoints. In general, it was felt that, because of their differences, all Departments should not be subject to arbitrary funding formulas. Departments need to be sensitive to and comply with legal and statutory requirements. It was generally agreed that many of the recommendations received from County employees can be implemented on a department by department basis at the department heads’ discretion. However, other suggestions require start-up fiscal commitments and should be looked at on a County wide basis. Many of the suggestions that could potentially create the most cost efficiencies/savings are dependent upon other agreements or legislation. For example, pay wage reductions, days off, changes to vacation and sick leave accrual, and changes in health benefit plans all require agreement by labor unions. Many functions carried out by operating departments lend themselves to being contracted out. The Department Heads reached a consensus regarding the top five issues that should be addressed on a Countywide basis. These top five items are listed below. The next ten issues that were repeatedly identified throughout the discussion are listed as well. DEPARTMENT HEAD CONSENSUS OF TOP COUNTYWIDE ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED IN PRIORITY ORDER (In Priority Order) Countywide paperless automated timekeeping1. One countywide e-mail program and standardize the name convention2. Workers Compensation: a. Modify or eliminate the County’s workers’ compensation salary continuation plan to State minimum b. Modify or eliminate the County’s continuing pay of wages (up to 3 hours per day for the duration of the claim) if the employee must attend medical appointments for a work related injury or illness during the work day 3. Pro-rate benefits for part-time employees4. Develop and implement Countywide training programs – especially for first-line supervisors and managers5. OTHER ISSUES WHICH RECEIVED MULTIPLE SUGGESTIONS (Not in Priority Order) Close non-24/7 services between the Christmas and New Year holidays1. Pro-rate benefits for part-time employees2. Reduce cost of employment benefits3. Centralize IT4. Eliminate employee service awards in-lieu of a non-cost recognition program5. Contract out: Janitorial, Landscaping, Fleet Management services6. Eliminate Affirmative Action/SBE Program7. Countywide imaging/filing/document management system (including personnel action requests)8. Increase County Administrator and Department Head authority (decrease micro-management)9. Re-examine County facilities and see if offices can be consolidated10. The Department Heads also spent time discussing principles for guiding the classification of core services. Although consensus was not reached due to time constraints, the following principles were discussed: PRINCIPLES GUIDING THE CLASSIFICATION OF CORE SERVICES (In Priority Order) Mandated by state law or the judiciary at the mandated level1. Mandated regulatory services2. Mandated services above the mandated level when funded from outside revenue3. Essential state-funded services which the county administers as an agent of the state4. Essential to the health and safety of county citizens and for which there are no other organizations or institutions able to provide them 5. Supportive of economic development6. Support services that increase the efficiency of the delivery of core services7. Each breakout table spent varying amounts of time on defining core services, beginning to define core services, and what services should be provided. This topic will be more fully addressed in the March 3 report to the Board. Finally, departments implemented an Employee Cost Savings Suggestion Campaign to generate recommendations from staff. A great deal of time was spent reviewing hundreds of cost savings ideas received from employees. Many of the suggestions have County wide implications and are included in Attachment D. The list is sorted into four sections with sub-groupings within each section. The first section lists those suggestions which, if feasible, could be implemented immediately. The second section includes those suggestions which, if feasible, would require either policy direction or action by the Board of Supervisors before it could be implemented. The third section lists those suggestions made by employees which would require discussion and agreement with labor representatives or legislation in order to be implemented, should that decision be made. The last section includes those suggestions which, at this time, staff feels are not feasible for implementation at this time. We continue to receive ideas from departments and add them to our lists. Departments are working with their employees and the County Administrator’s Office to review those suggestions which impact only their own operations. Those with clear cost savings potential and few inhibitors are being implemented immediately, others are being evaluated in context of legality, start-up costs, etc. A summary of the Employment and Human Services and Health Services Departments’ suggestion campaigns are also attached (Attachments E and F). State Budget As of noon Wednesday, February 18 the State had yet to adopt a budget. The Urban Counties Caucus reported that the budget was stalled (again). Although many bills in the package had the votes for passage, the Senate was still short a vote on the tax bill. The details listed below are the latest information gathered, however, since budget negotiations are on-going there may be new ideas added or some of these details could change. In addition, many of the revenue increases and cuts listed below may be limited in scope or not taken depending on the federal stimulus package and whether the spending cap is approved by the voters. Major highlights of the budget package: Defers county payments for social services in July and August (similar to last year’s budget). Provides for a spending cap/rainy day fund. Includes provisions on judicial benefits. Provides for a special election on May 19th to approve the following: spending cap, Proposition 98, Lottery securitization, Proposition 10 transfers, and Proposition 63 transfers. Revenues The package includes $14.4 billion in taxes as follows (reduced to $12.5 billion if federal funds are available): Increasing the sales tax by 1 cent through 2011/12. Temporary tax increase that will sunset in 2012 if the spending cap is approved, if the voters reject the spending cap it would expire in 2011. Increasing gasoline taxes by 12 cents per gallon for up to five years if spending cap passes, if it fails through 2011/12. Raising the VLF from 0.65 percent to 1.15 percent through 2013/14 (2011/12 if spending cap fails). A portion of these funds would be used to fund local law enforcement programs. portion of these funds would be used to fund local law enforcement programs. Increasing the personal income tax surtax 5% across the board for up to five years, if spending cap passes (2011/12 if spending cap fails). This would be triggered down to 2.5% if federal funds are available. Reduces the size of dependent credit exemption (Personal Income Tax) to the level of personal credit for up to 5 years if cap passes (2011/12 if cap fails). Deferrals Defers county Social Service payments for July and August to September 2009. This language exempts SSI/SSP and IHSS payments form the deferral and exampts counties under 40,000 in population. Defers fuel excise tax allocaiton for local streets and roads scheduled for January, Feburary, March and April to be paid in May (applies to 2009 only) Economic Stimulus Package President Obama signed into law the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 on February 17, 2009. This economic stimulus legislation is a supplemental appropriations bill with tax provisions. The objectives of the bill include job preservation and creation, infrastructure investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance to the unemployed, and State and local fiscal stabilization. According to Moody’s U.S. Public Finance report of February, since relatively few of the federal programs that are being expanded are funded from cities’ and counties’ general funds, the increase in federal funding doesn't directly offset much of the general fund revenue and expenditure pressures that local governments are facing as a result of the economic downturn. Though it won’t have much of an impact on city and county general funds, much of the stimulus bill’s infrastructure spending will nevertheless be well received by local governments. The more significant benefits on the local level are likely to be indirect in the form of fewer lost jobs, few foreclosures and, ultimately, less of a reduction in sales and other economically-sensitive tax revenues. Department Heads have been asked to monitor the Economic Stimulus Package and the State Budget as they develop. We will address the Board at our first opportunity with local impacts anticipated from these major measures. Next Steps The Board of Supervisors, using the results of the Summit Report and other materials to be provided by the County Administrator will conduct a budget/policy discussion of March 3. On that date, it is anticipated that the Board will develop a policy to guide the County Administrator in preparing a FY 2009/10 Recommended Budget and a FY 2010/11 Planning Budget. The County Administrator will return to the Board of March 17 with the Recommended Budget for FY 2009/10 and the Planning Budget for FY 2010/11. It is anticipated that the Board will adopt a Final Budget on March 17. All reductions not associated with lay-offs will become affective as soon as possible following that date and no later than May 1. CLERK'S ADDENDUM County Administrator David Twa presented the item and commented on the importance of updating the County’s business models. Supervisor Piepho said that critical care and public safety are top priorities, yet said they seem to be the hardest hit by the Budget crisis. Mr. Twa responded that Health and Human Services and Public Safety are the biggest parts of the County’s General Fund and so proportionately appear to be the hardest hit. He added that there is also the issue of, Are we going to use County reserves to address this crisis? He said doing so is an easier decision if we think we are dealing with short-term problems, which in this case he said we are not. Supervisor Piepho said she would appreciate looking for a way to keep the Sheriff’s deputies, saying the proposed elimination of 70 deputies is too stark an action to take. She asked if any proposed measures for cost savings could be implemented quickly in order to help offset proposed cuts. Mr. Twa said that cost-saving measures that could be implemented immediately are being implemented now, but said that overall they will still not be a solution. He added that it will be the long-term solutions that will really make changes. Supervisor Piepho suggested it would be useful to have a discussion about how to define core services. Supervisor Uilkema asked about the District Attorney’s budget and “unforeseen retirement budget conversions.” Lisa Driscoll, County Administrator’s Office, responded that the conversions are those of employees converting years of service from Tier 2 to Tier 3 in the retirement structure, and noted that when and how much employees choose to make this conversion can obligate the County to match dollars accordingly. She added that this is happening countywide, but said that since the D.A.’s office employs attorneys – higher-cost employees – the costs in that department are higher. Supervisor Uilkema requested clarification that this report does not address impacts to the County’s budget based on current and proposed changes to the State’s budget. Mr. Twa responded that it does not. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C Attachment D Attachment E Attachment F Fiscal Year 2008-09Second QuarterGeneral FundBudgetedActualActual as %BudgetedActualActual as %Department Revenue Revenue of Budget Expenses Expenses of BudgetBOARD OF SUPERVISORS 2,293,538$ 1,304,443$ 56.9% 7,835,839$ 2,513,307$ 32.1%GENERAL COUNTY SERVICES 6,979,967 2,773,799 39.7% 17,210,510 11,412,066 66.3%COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 12,583,763 4,518,040 35.9% 20,987,308 8,652,826 41.2%GENERAL COUNTY REVENUES 358,773,839 196,863,356 54.9% 0 5 0.0%PERSONNEL 6,414,071 1,737,757 27.1% 9,491,780 3,778,328 39.8%AUDITOR-CONTROLLER 4,640,991 1,567,266 33.8% 8,008,000 3,791,327 47.3%PLANT ACQUISITION 5,352,450 198,073 0.0% 19,273,594 5,048,875 26.2%TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 3,430,500 1,892,151 55.2% 5,308,412 2,442,684 46.0%ASSESSOR 1,412,500 314,634 22.3% 16,345,900 8,972,590 54.9%COUNTY COUNSEL 3,493,080 1,391,980 39.8% 5,316,701 3,238,829 60.9%HEALTH SERVICES 173,090,407 41,390,158 23.9% 282,742,194 140,932,761 49.8%EMPLMNT & HUMAN SVCS 350,364,895 97,216,553 27.7% 377,563,865 201,901,884 53.5%SUPERIOR COURT-JURY COMM 8,937,168 3,442,552 38.5% 20,346,559 8,446,361 41.5%JUSTICE SYSTEM PLANNING 893,747 225,096 25.2% 4,282,145 2,370,489 55.4%COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER 10,893,839 5,670,207 52.0% 14,065,527 7,544,180 53.6%SHERIFF-CORONER 128,006,024 38,683,040 30.2% 194,151,514 94,242,852 48.5%PROBATION 23,296,655 7,318,442 31.4% 61,361,489 30,574,820 49.8%AGRICULTURE-WEIGHTS/MEAS 3,291,046 639,614 19.4% 5,257,070 2,572,845 48.9%CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 25,133,301 9,825,993 39.1% 25,611,929 10,927,430 42.7%ANIMAL SERVICES 6,474,123 3,544,843 54.8% 10,382,229 4,816,474 46.4%DISTRICT ATTORNEY 17,459,079 4,806,125 27.5% 29,011,149 15,697,167 54.1%PUBLIC DEFENDER 50,057 18,367 36.7% 19,061,755 9,508,468 49.9%PUBLIC WORKS 60,359,257 25,746,530 42.7% 60,622,035 33,261,578 54.9%GENERAL SERVICES 34,265,446 19,758,985 57.7% 48,229,795 25,310,886 52.5%MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 145,000 57,500 39.7% 1,068,009 515,903 48.3%APPROPRIATIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES 0 0 0.0% 10,000,000 0 0.0%TOTAL 1,248,034,743$ 470,905,504$ 37.7% 1,273,535,308$ 638,474,935$ 50.1%Attachment A Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 100300 01 0001 DEPARTMENT OF SUPERVISORS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 3,353,271 1,627,642 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,671,553 663,322 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,400 877 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 123,250 (26) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 5,026,224 2,291,841 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,149,474 2,291,815 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 169,000 73,523 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 408,579 55,320 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 577,579 129,843 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 4,571,895 2,161,972 100300 01 0007 BOARD MITIGATION PROGRAMS E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,094,430 398,999 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 505,085 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (185,494) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,599,515 398,999 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,599,515 213,505 R9100 TAXES OTHER THAN CUR PROP 725,000 189,554 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 960,000 985,047 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,685,000 1,174,600 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 914,515 (961,095) 100300 01 0036 PERSONNEL MERIT BOARD E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 42,496 4,259 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 44,354 3,728 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 86,850 7,987 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 86,850 7,987 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 30,959 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 30,959 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 55,891 7,987 100300 02 0025 MANAGEMENT INFO SYSTEMS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 25,248 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,400,423 475,275 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 64,000 6,309 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (100,000) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,489,671 481,583 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,389,671 481,583 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 200,000 209,827 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 250,440 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 200,000 460,267 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,189,671 21,316 100300 02 0135 ECONOMIC PROMOTION E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 54,573 35,989 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 54,573 35,989 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 54,573 35,989 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 12,600 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 12,600 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 54,573 23,389 Page 1 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 100300 02 0145 EMPLOYEE/RETIREE BENEFITS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 1,340,524 642,815 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,029,102 701,035 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 89,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 3,458,626 1,343,851 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,458,626 1,343,851 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 133,328 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 133,328 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 3,458,626 1,210,523 100300 02 0150 INSURANCE AND RISK MGMT E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 3,961,545 1,777,704 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 5,049,128 (491,868) E3000 OTHER CHARGES 3,099,721 5,996,491 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 73,393 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 23,853 11,257 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 12,183,787 7,282,327 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 12,207,640 7,293,584 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 468,000 205,892 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 6,311,967 1,961,711 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 6,779,967 2,167,603 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 5,427,673 5,125,981 100300 02 0790 NOTES & WARRANTS INTEREST E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 100,000 (7,010) E3000 OTHER CHARGES 2,264,070 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 100,000 2,257,060 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 100,000 2,257,060 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 100,000 2,257,060 135000 02 0791 RETIREMENT UAAL BOND FUND E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 4,211,645 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 55,312,572 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 59,524,217 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 59,524,217 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 900,000 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 55,312,572 26,332,561 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 56,212,572 26,332,561 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 3,311,645 (26,332,561) 115000 02 0792 NOTES & WARRANTS INTEREST E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,000 (2,593) E3000 OTHER CHARGES 198,000 837,396 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 200,000 834,803 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 200,000 834,803 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 200,000 834,803 135200 02 0793 RET LITGTN STLMNT DBT SVC E3000 OTHER CHARGES 2,759,911 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,759,911 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,759,911 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 2,759,911 1,149,963 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,759,911 1,149,963 Page 2 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (1,149,963) 100300 03 0002 CLERK OF THE BOARD E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 592,034 300,609 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 57,905 34,747 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (63,168) (4) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 649,939 335,356 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 586,771 335,352 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 58,000 25,517 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 492 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 102,896 10,528 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 160,896 36,536 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 425,875 298,816 100300 03 0003 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 4,725,080 1,990,381 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,190,866 528,915 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 38 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 150,000 45,111 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (1,360,016) (298,641) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 6,065,946 2,564,445 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,705,930 2,265,805 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 103,317 6,599 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 334,498 27,199 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 52 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 437,815 33,850 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 4,268,115 2,231,955 100300 03 0004 CROCKETT-RODEO REVENUES E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 418,137 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 222,330 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 640,467 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 640,467 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 640,467 0 100300 03 0018 COUNTY-STATE-WCCHCD IGT R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 2,500,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,500,000 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC)(2,500,000)0 100300 03 0026 REVENUE COLLECTIONS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 2,672,032 1,443,551 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 711,556 394,993 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 5,100 (2,016) E4000 FIXED ASSETS 20,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (495,000) (160,310) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 3,408,688 1,836,529 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,913,688 1,676,219 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 215,000 130,976 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,955,240 820,801 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,170,240 951,777 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 743,448 724,442 Page 3 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 100300 03 0059 COMMUNITY ACCESS TV E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,885,382 226,896 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,885,382 226,896 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,885,382 226,896 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 795,000 363,450 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 10,123 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 128,880 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 795,000 502,452 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 2,090,382 (275,556) 100300 03 0147 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 9,218,770 4,526,546 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 3,843,611 1,309,818 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 527,262 298,064 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 3,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (9,973,872) (3,842,815) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 13,592,643 6,134,428 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,618,771 2,291,613 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 3,281,821 1,357,875 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 3,281,821 1,357,875 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 336,950 933,738 100300 03 0060 TELECOMMUNICATIONS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 2,451,352 1,085,010 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 3,443,502 1,412,496 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,046,786 590,457 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 19,372 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (4,000,885) (2,020,770) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 6,941,640 3,107,336 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,940,755 1,086,566 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 567,581 274,786 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 2,264,707 1,099,465 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,832,288 1,374,251 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 108,467 (287,685) 100300 03 0235 LAW & JUSTICE SYSTEMS DEV E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 254,103 132,438 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 201,576 78,457 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 17,808 30,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 455,679 210,895 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 473,487 240,895 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 140,231 (26,702) R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 29,472 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 169,703 (26,702) NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 303,784 267,597 134000 03 0272 AVA SERVICE AUTHORITY E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,001,184 211,031 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 20,173 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,001,184 211,031 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,001,184 231,204 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 885,000 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 233,539 Page 4 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 885,000 233,539 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 116,184 (2,335) 100300 03 0356 LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION E3000 OTHER CHARGES 179,587 179,587 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 179,587 179,587 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 179,587 179,587 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 179,587 179,587 100300 03 0581 ZERO TLRNCE DOM VIOL INIT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,042,470 349,894 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,042,470 349,894 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,042,470 349,894 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 236,000 288,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 236,000 288,000 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,806,470 61,894 112500 03 0585 DOM VIOLENCE VICTIM ASIST E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 61,210 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 148,682 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 61,210 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 148,682 61,210 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 98,008 59,018 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 36,000 18,238 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 134,008 77,256 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 14,674 (16,046) 112700 03 0586 ZERO TOLRNCE-DOM VIOLENCE E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 208,756 100,949 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 249,657 49,184 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 13,110 3,351 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 471,523 153,483 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 471,523 153,483 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 635 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 300,000 143,150 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 300,000 143,786 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 171,523 9,697 100300 04 0005 REVENUE - GENERAL COUNTY E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 5 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 5 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5 R8980 FUND BALANCE 10,003,922 R9000 TAXES CURRENT PROPERTY 291,834,671 180,741,620 R9100 TAXES OTHER THAN CUR PROP 19,836,000 7,264,189 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 9,171,683 1,547,845 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 9,490,000 50,860 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 5,000,000 3,531,204 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 5,330,000 1,766,246 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 7,717,000 1,525,095 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 390,563 436,297 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 358,773,839 196,863,356 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC)(358,773,839) (196,863,351) Page 5 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 100300 05 0035 HUMAN RESOURCES E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 5,524,821 2,258,821 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 4,143,152 1,641,970 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 18,999 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (961,681) (127,900) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 9,667,973 3,919,790 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,706,292 3,791,890 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 210,420 92,572 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 2,890,581 353,385 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 3,301,476 1,287,216 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 6,402,477 1,733,174 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 2,303,815 2,058,716 100300 05 0038 CHILD CARE E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 816,651 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (31,163) (13,562) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 816,651 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 785,488 (13,562) R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 11,594 4,583 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 11,594 4,583 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 773,894 (18,145) 115000 10 0009 REVENUE-AUTOMATED SYS DEV R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 200,000 1,125,129 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 200,000 1,125,129 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC)(200,000) (1,125,129) 100300 10 0010 AUDITOR - CONTROLLER E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 6,591,382 3,138,208 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,738,618 734,799 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 600 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (322,000) (82,279) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 8,330,000 3,873,606 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,008,000 3,791,327 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 4,470,991 1,564,378 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 170,000 2,888 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 4,640,991 1,567,266 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 3,367,009 2,224,061 115000 10 0011 AUTOMATED SYSTEMS DVLPMNT E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 170,000 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 170,000 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 170,000 0 100300 11 0080 MINOR CAP IMPROVEMENTS E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 487,866 33,368 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 487,866 33,368 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 487,866 33,368 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 1,900 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,900 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 487,866 31,468 Page 6 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 100300 11 0111 PLANT ACQUIS-GENERAL FUND E4000 FIXED ASSETS 18,785,728 5,015,507 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 18,785,728 5,015,507 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 18,785,728 5,015,507 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 600 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4,679,664 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 672,786 195,573 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 5,352,450 196,173 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 13,433,278 4,819,334 110600 11 0119 CRIM JUST FACILITY CNSTRN E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 180,788 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,220,000 996,412 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 1,360,129 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,760,917 996,412 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,760,917 996,412 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 1,285,000 498,860 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 5,077 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,285,000 503,937 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,475,917 492,475 110700 11 0122 COURTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,370,500 223,392 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,370,500 223,392 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,370,500 223,392 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 1,063,000 421,562 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY (20,000) (26) R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 327,500 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,370,500 421,536 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (198,144) 105900 11 0130 ELLINWOOD TENANT IMPS E3000 OTHER CHARGES 21,916 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 7,454,119 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 7,476,035 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 7,476,035 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 9,095,293 30,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 9,095,293 30,000 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC)(9,095,293)7,446,035 100300 15 0015 TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 3,817,124 1,678,832 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,481,288 751,315 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 10,000 15,238 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (2,700) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 5,308,412 2,445,384 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,308,412 2,442,684 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 610,000 337,570 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 2,548,500 1,438,853 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 272,000 115,729 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 3,430,500 1,892,151 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,877,912 550,533 Page 7 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 100300 16 0016 ASSESSOR E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 14,562,969 6,887,778 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,022,771 862,996 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 4,900 2,500 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 10,044 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (254,784)8,730 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 16,600,684 7,753,274 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16,345,900 7,762,003 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,154,500 297,037 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 258,000 17,597 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,412,500 314,634 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 14,933,400 7,447,369 115100 16 0017 PROPERTY TAX ADMIN E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 2,963,181 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,963,181 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 10,211 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 10,211 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 2,963,181 (10,211) 100300 16 0019 ASSMT LITIGATION SVCS E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,210,587 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,210,587 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,210,587 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 1,210,587 100300 17 0030 COUNTY COUNSEL E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 8,464,293 3,987,563 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 698,775 297,424 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 34 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (3,846,367) (1,046,192) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 9,163,068 4,285,021 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,316,701 3,238,829 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 125,888 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 3,367,192 1,391,980 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 3,493,080 1,391,980 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,823,621 1,846,849 100300 18 0301 HLTH SVCS-DETENTION INMATES E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 10,736,302 5,267,973 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 8,145,637 3,970,353 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 89 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (1,542,402) (642,668) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 18,881,939 9,238,414 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17,339,537 8,595,747 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 131,012 75,770 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 8,992 5,320 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 140,004 81,090 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 17,199,533 8,514,657 100300 18 0450 HEALTH SVCS-PUBLIC HEALTH E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 33,049,895 16,236,597 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 11,084,075 5,161,254 Page 8 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date E3000 OTHER CHARGES (202,209) E4000 FIXED ASSETS 110,235 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (3,781,818) (1,877,826) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 44,041,996 21,397,850 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 40,260,178 19,520,025 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 31,040 13,209 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 20,409 3,635 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 16,984 9,434 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 20,956,081 4,412,539 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 4,767,541 2,230,388 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1,741,442 1,073,266 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 27,533,497 7,742,471 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 12,726,681 11,777,554 100300 18 0451 CONSERVATOR/GUARDIANSHIP E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 1,827,243 1,072,298 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 316,485 256,746 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 5,115 7,229 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,143,728 1,329,044 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,148,843 1,336,273 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 280,000 232,079 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 57,295 9,677 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 3,170 83 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 340,465 241,840 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,808,378 1,094,433 100300 18 0452 HEALTH SVCS-ENVIRON HLTH E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 13,249,301 6,691,472 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 3,587,012 1,345,201 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 3,200 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 47,039 8,863 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 191,147 93,107 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 16,883,352 8,048,736 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17,074,499 8,141,843 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 75,000 54,843 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 250,000 172,855 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 150,000 (13,506) R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 16,787,128 4,479,384 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 75,000 72,029 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 17,337,128 4,765,605 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC)(262,629)3,376,238 100300 18 0460 HLTH SVC-CALIF CHILD SVCS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 6,479,994 3,227,933 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,129,978 816,140 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 202,209 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 7,812,181 4,044,073 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 7,812,181 4,044,073 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 6,230,322 779,475 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 313,654 262,716 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 262 60 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 6,544,238 1,042,251 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,267,943 3,001,822 Page 9 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 100300 18 0463 HSD HOMELESS PROGRAM E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 626,280 265,571 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 3,866,829 2,204,762 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (1,223,373) (155,959) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 4,493,109 2,470,333 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,269,736 2,314,374 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 5,000 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 7,200 3,600 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,305,362 204,790 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 212,261 31,656 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,529,823 240,046 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 739,913 2,074,328 100300 18 0465 HLTH SVS-HOSPITAL SUBSIDY E3000 OTHER CHARGES 64,465,544 32,232,773 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 64,465,544 32,232,773 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 64,465,544 32,232,773 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 64,465,544 32,232,773 100300 18 0466 ALCOHOL & OTHER DRUGS SVC E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 4,528,006 2,097,927 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 12,459,581 5,333,387 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 19,491 496 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (1,032,774) (274,758) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 17,007,078 7,431,809 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 15,974,304 7,157,051 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 442,653 170,973 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 160,884 94,551 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 9,173,712 5,467,983 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 3,696,071 1,541,157 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 2,115,649 350,538 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 15,588,969 7,625,202 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 385,335 (468,151) 100300 18 0467 HLTH SERVICES-MNTL HLTH E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 35,918,066 18,826,862 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 79,758,466 38,778,381 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,524,237 717,172 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 57,963 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (2,861,360) (731,813) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 117,258,732 58,322,415 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 114,397,372 57,590,602 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 70,000 19,221 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 283,449 182,120 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 66,564,780 12,475,170 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 33,047,144 7,835,139 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 3,110,910 (859,995) TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 103,076,283 19,651,654 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 11,321,089 37,938,948 113700 18 0468 HLTH SVCS-CHIP AB75 TOBACCO E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES (200,581) Page 10 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 151,795 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES (200,581) TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES (48,786) R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 460 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE (48,786) TOTREV GROSS REVENUE (48,326) NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (460) 113700 18 0469 HLTH-CHIP/AB75 TOBACCO E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 75,741 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 818,812 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 75,741 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 894,553 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 894,553 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 894,553 113500 18 0471 EMERGENCY MEDICAL SVCS E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,051,656 631,613 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,051,656 631,613 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,051,656 631,613 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 1,650,006 555,348 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 8,734 322 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 315,123 151,795 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,973,863 707,466 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 77,793 (75,853) 113600 18 0470 PROP 36-SUB ABUSE CP ACT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 323,388 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 60,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 2,145,012 538,406 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 383,388 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,528,400 538,406 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 98,780 2,038 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,278,533 2,120,112 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,377,313 2,122,150 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 151,087 (1,583,744) 114600 18 0475 PROP 63 MH SVCS ACCT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 9,006,670 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 9,006,670 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 9,006,670 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 61,544 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 5,723,684 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 5,785,228 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 9,006,670 (5,785,228) 145000 18 0540 HLTH SVS-HOSPITAL ENTRPSE E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 254,662,234 125,977,439 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 87,625,337 47,255,918 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 342,287,571 173,233,356 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 342,287,571 173,233,356 R8110 MEDICARE PATIENT SERVICES 26,868,668 17,907,244 R8120 MEDI-CAL PATIENT SERVICES 119,950,476 69,676,358 Page 11 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date R8130 HLTH PLAN PATIENT SVCS 77,792,219 54,360,401 R8140 PRIVATE PAY PATIENT SVCS 6,897,496 6,503,645 R8160 INTERDEPT PATIENT SVCS 3,907,800 2,544,247 R8180 OTHER PATIENT SVCS (5,280) R8200 OTHER HOSPITAL REVENUES 5,840,193 1,838,610 R8270 CHARGES TO GEN FUND UNITS 21,269,027 10,452,101 R8300 EXTERNAL HEALTH PLAN REVENUE 18,429,234 6,599,340 R8380 ENTERPRISE FUND SUBSIDY 61,071,724 29,496,827 R8800 SCHOOLS FUNDS REVENUE 260,734 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 342,287,571 199,373,493 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (26,140,137) 145000 18 0853 HOSPITIAL FIXED ASSETS E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 5,581 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 5,492,255 2,623,572 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 8,016,000 2,257,708 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 13,508,255 4,886,862 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 13,508,255 4,886,862 R8120 MEDI-CAL PATIENT SERVICES 3,093,255 R8200 OTHER HOSPITAL REVENUES 10,415,000 1,547,446 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 13,508,255 1,547,446 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 3,339,416 146000 18 0860 CONTRA COSTA HEALTH PLAN E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 11,227,824 5,876,518 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 72,365,587 34,592,788 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 5,335,750 2,352,867 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 88,929,161 42,822,173 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 88,929,161 42,822,173 R8300 EXTERNAL HEALTH PLAN REVENUE 88,929,161 36,159,272 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 88,929,161 36,159,272 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 6,662,901 146100 18 0861 CCHP-COMMUNITY PLAN E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 447 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 101,556,892 52,244,731 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 101,556,892 52,245,178 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 101,556,892 52,245,178 R8200 OTHER HOSPITAL REVENUES 4,607,760 (129,470) R8300 EXTERNAL HEALTH PLAN REVENUE 91,477,242 38,199,214 R8380 ENTERPRISE FUND SUBSIDY 3,393,820 2,735,946 R8980 FUND BALANCE 2,078,070 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 101,556,892 40,805,690 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 11,439,488 146200 18 0862 MAJOR RISK MED INS BD PRGM E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,233,645 418,724 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,233,645 418,724 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,233,645 418,724 R8400 MAJOR RISK MED INS REVENUE 1,233,645 442,257 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,233,645 442,257 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (23,533) Page 12 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 146000 18 0863 HEALTH PLAN FIXED ASSETS E3000 OTHER CHARGES 25,000 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 50,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 75,000 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 75,000 R8200 OTHER HOSPITAL REVENUES 75,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 75,000 100300 19 0501 EHSD ADMINISTRATIVE SVCS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 20,622,867 13,789,493 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 20,117,053 8,082,523 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 365,279 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 435,039 237,145 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (38,916,173) (2,794,995) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 41,174,959 22,474,440 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,258,786 19,679,445 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 102,174 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,855,371 21,888 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 796 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,855,371 124,858 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC)(596,585)19,554,587 100300 19 0502 EHSD CHILDREN & FAMILY SVCS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 40,546,920 21,767,087 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 29,225,119 9,509,150 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 52,093,675 24,289,748 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (3,681,587) (321,030) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 121,865,714 55,565,984 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 118,184,127 55,244,954 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 159,000 69,951 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 12,000 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 100,470,716 30,805,225 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 6,300 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 62,247 312,522 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 100,691,963 31,205,997 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 17,492,164 24,038,957 100300 19 0503 EHSD AGING & ADULT SVCS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 36,401,650 17,059,626 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 46,253,608 10,676,183 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 14,633,877 9,126,276 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (4,376,901)5,263 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 97,289,135 36,862,085 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 92,912,234 36,867,347 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 90,109,776 14,578,631 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 268,586 266,753 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 275,000 164,105 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 90,653,362 15,009,489 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 2,258,872 21,857,858 100300 19 0504 EHSD WORKFORCE SVCS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 48,809,481 22,878,941 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 29,830,134 7,511,813 Page 13 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date E3000 OTHER CHARGES 63,944,994 40,817,422 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (19,549,993)10,629 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 142,584,609 71,208,176 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 123,034,616 71,218,805 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 115,389,490 34,898,130 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 52,478 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 115,389,490 34,950,608 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 7,645,126 36,268,197 132800 19 0505 COUNTY CHILDRENS E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 378,358 64,126 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 12,843 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 378,358 76,969 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 378,358 76,969 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 201,579 108,757 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 201,579 108,757 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 176,779 (31,788) 100300 19 0507 EHS - ANN ADLER CHILD & FMLY E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 92,461 39,989 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 92,461 39,989 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 92,461 39,989 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 92,461 79,495 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 92,461 79,495 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (39,506) 115500 19 0508 IHSS PUBLIC AUTHORITY E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 1,011,135 398,539 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 321,442 115,968 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 419,343 145,363 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 180,000 35,240 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,751,920 659,870 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,931,920 695,110 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,593,367 (23,490) R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 364,260 5,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,957,627 (18,490) NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC)(25,707)713,600 100300 19 0535 EHS SERVICE INTEGRATION E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 986,833 70,529 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,800 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 5,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (7,500) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 991,833 72,329 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 991,833 64,829 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 29,700 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 812,045 172,046 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 841,745 172,046 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 150,088 (107,217) 142500 19 0578 EHSD-COMMUNITY SERVICES E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 117,942 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 27,682 (611) Page 14 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date E3000 OTHER CHARGES 193 193 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 11,683 13,825 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 145,817 (417) TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 157,500 13,408 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 157,500 5,019 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 157,500 5,019 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 8,389 100300 19 0583 EHSD WFRC INVESTMENT BRD E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 2,434,893 1,269,096 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 3,569,064 1,508,830 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 100,000 43,427 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 35,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (58,982)856 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 6,138,957 2,821,353 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,079,975 2,822,209 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 6,033,477 1,289,634 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 52,498 42,432 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 6,085,975 1,332,066 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC)(6,000)1,490,143 114800 19 0584 COMM COLL CHILD DEV-DEPT E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 105,180 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 5,813 921 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,299 1,299 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 1,608,439 857,118 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 112,292 2,221 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,720,731 859,339 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,436,561 600,019 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 257,925 254,432 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,694,486 854,451 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 26,245 4,888 100300 19 0588 COMMUNITY SERVICES E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 16,975,416 7,664,193 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 8,859,660 5,042,835 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 14,295 21,464 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 80,000 13,176 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 8,080,463 3,222,638 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 25,929,371 12,741,667 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 34,009,834 15,964,305 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 98,001 55,181 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 22,635,993 7,256,855 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 11,020,534 7,029,958 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 33,754,528 14,341,994 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 255,306 1,622,311 111600 19 0589 CHILD DEV-DEPT E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 9,097,304 3,217,631 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,300,560 930,017 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 4,499,022 2,138,920 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 50,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 9,719,452 3,993,924 Page 15 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 15,946,886 6,286,568 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 25,666,338 10,280,492 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY (5,148) R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 18,018,013 8,992,322 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 7,477,957 3,019,737 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 25,495,970 12,006,911 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 170,368 (1,726,419) 100300 20 0202 TRIAL COURT PROGRAMS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 2,690 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 3,069,816 595,431 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 17,080,033 7,625,638 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 142,924 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 20,149,849 8,223,759 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 20,149,849 8,366,683 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 25,000 12,830 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 3,047,724 1,132,078 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 100,000 61,214 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 5,764,444 2,235,042 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1,387 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 8,937,168 3,442,552 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 11,212,681 4,924,131 100300 20 0231 CHNG VENUE TRIALS IN CITY E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 39 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 39 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 39 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 39 100300 20 0238 CIVIL GRAND JURY E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 146,710 56,542 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 474 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 146,710 57,016 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 146,710 57,016 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 146,710 57,016 100300 20 0239 CRIMINAL GRAND JURY E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 50,000 22,623 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 50,000 22,623 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 50,000 22,623 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 50,000 22,623 100300 22 0246 DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 409,925 78,539 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 10,000 1,960 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 419,925 80,499 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 419,925 80,499 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 210,000 104,022 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 210,000 104,022 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 209,925 (23,523) 100300 22 0248 CONFLICT DEFENSE SERVICES E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,675,000 2,082,868 Page 16 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,675,000 2,082,868 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,675,000 2,082,868 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 2,675,000 2,082,868 114000 22 0260 AUTOMATED ID & WARRANT E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 576 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,351,351 12,577 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 221,344 358,695 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 250,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 29,472 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,822,695 371,848 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,852,167 371,848 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 415,000 145,270 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 33,035 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 225,000 300,000 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 50,048 30,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 723,083 475,270 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,129,084 (103,422) 114300 22 0264 SLESF-FRONT LINE ENF-CITY E3000 OTHER CHARGES 2,388,221 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,388,221 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,388,221 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,388,221 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,388,221 100300 22 0265 VEHICLE THEFT PROGRAM E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,607,145 287,621 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,607,145 287,621 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,607,145 287,621 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 893,747 217,713 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 893,747 217,713 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 713,398 69,908 115600 22 0275 DNA IDENTIFICATION FUND E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 777,392 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 12,195 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 777,392 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 777,392 12,195 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 182,325 113,532 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 182,325 113,532 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 595,067 (101,337) 100300 22 0325 JUSTICE SYSTEM PROGRAMS R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 7,383 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 7,383 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (7,383) 100300 24 0043 ELECTIONS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 3,444,364 2,210,928 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 6,782,401 3,643,147 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 138,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 6,793 3,458 Page 17 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 10,364,765 5,854,076 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,371,558 5,857,533 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4,388,000 3,595,818 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 2,711,455 377,162 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 15,000 14,970 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 7,114,455 3,987,950 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 3,257,103 1,869,583 110100 24 0237 CLERK RECORDS AUTOMATION E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 30 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 42 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 72 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 72 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 3 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 3 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 72 (3) 110000 24 0353 RECORDER MICRO/MOD E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 1,182,051 574,510 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 8,710,699 309,498 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 531,092 146,423 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 936,219 11,610 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 11,360,061 1,042,042 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 11,360,061 1,042,042 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,868,000 713,192 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,868,000 713,192 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 9,492,061 328,850 100300 24 0355 RECORDER E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 3,009,660 1,411,945 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 777,806 282,841 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 600 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 5,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (98,497) (8,740) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 3,792,466 1,695,386 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,693,969 1,686,646 R9100 TAXES OTHER THAN CUR PROP 90,000 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 3,664,384 1,673,670 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 25,000 8,587 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 3,779,384 1,682,257 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC)(85,415)4,389 105600 25 0126 CO LAW ENF COMPTR CAP-PRJ E3000 OTHER CHARGES 139 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 527,548 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 139 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 527,548 139 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 200,000 39,512 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 200,000 39,512 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 327,548 (39,373) 105600 25 0129 CO LAW ENF COMM CAP-PROJ E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,701,515 Page 18 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 2,000,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,701,515 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,701,515 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 274,800 90,644 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 150,000 83,318 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 424,800 173,962 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 3,276,715 (173,962) 105600 25 0131 CO LAW ENF HLCPTR CAP PRJ E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 224,435 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 450,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 224,435 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 674,435 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 70,000 51,293 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 70,000 51,293 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 604,435 (51,293) 114200 25 0252 SHER FORFEIT-FED-DOJ E3000 OTHER CHARGES 8,442 105 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 213,100 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 8,442 105 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 221,542 105 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 9,000 1,951 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 9,000 1,951 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 212,542 (1,846) 114100 25 0253 SHER NARC FRFEIT-ST/LOCAL E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 87,620 3 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 44,357 244 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 339,997 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 131,977 247 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 471,974 247 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 30,000 4,482 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 55,000 47,618 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 85,000 52,100 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 386,974 (51,853) 100300 25 0255 SHERIFF E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 90,349,441 45,637,605 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 9,353,389 4,474,835 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 104,750 247,046 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 2,807,900 1,486,451 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 1,360,196 972,335 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 102,615,480 51,845,937 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 103,975,676 52,818,273 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 40,000 37,456 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 222,000 114,333 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 70,000 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 36,494,045 10,719,135 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 29,172,828 10,661,385 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 9,622,406 178,317 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 75,621,279 21,710,626 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 28,354,397 31,107,647 Page 19 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 110400 25 0256 CRIMINALISTIC LAB FUND E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 34,445 707 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 4,500 103 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 99,106 812 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 38,945 810 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 138,051 1,622 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 15,000 6,161 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 4,500 1,311 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 19,500 7,472 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 118,551 (5,850) 142000 25 0258 SHERIFF LAW ENF TRNG CNTR E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 1,024,044 531,916 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 125,100 61,274 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 115,412 76,135 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 3,500 21,757 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,264,556 669,326 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,268,056 691,083 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 220,000 79,323 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 817,000 438,927 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 250,200 31,338 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,287,200 549,587 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC)(19,144)141,496 114300 25 0262 SLESF-JAIL CONSTR & OPS E3000 OTHER CHARGES 69,363 762 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 583,477 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 69,363 762 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 652,840 762 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 339,223 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 339,223 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 313,617 762 114300 25 0263 SLESF-FRONT LINE ENF-CO E3000 OTHER CHARGES 2,000 820 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 512,276 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,000 820 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 514,276 820 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 14,446 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 326,754 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 326,754 14,446 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 187,522 (13,626) 114500 25 0268 SHER FORFEIT-FED TREASURY E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 15,169 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 500 104 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 150,056 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 15,669 104 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 165,725 104 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 7,000 1,323 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 8,000 1,323 Page 20 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 157,725 (1,219) 136000 25 0270 CENTRAL IDENTIFY BUREAU E3000 OTHER CHARGES 2,222,117 133 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 1,890,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,222,117 133 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,112,117 133 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 140,000 33,162 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 721,000 586,104 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 135,000 141,721 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 996,000 760,987 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 3,116,117 (760,854) 133400 25 0271 CO-WIDE GANG AND DRUG E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,002,939 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 117 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,002,939 117 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,002,939 117 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 5,000 9,965 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 100,000 46,221 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 105,000 56,186 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 897,939 (56,069) 114700 25 0273 PRISONERS WELFARE E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 661,001 329,822 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,313,385 466,239 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 28,860 2,371 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 6,000 6,857 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 3,003,246 798,432 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,009,246 805,289 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 55,000 11,331 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 40,000 10,735 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1,534,220 618,332 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,629,220 640,398 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,380,026 164,891 136000 25 0274 AB 879 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 890,000 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 890,000 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 890,000 461,147 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 890,000 461,147 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (461,147) 100300 25 0300 CUSTODY SERVICES BUREAU E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 69,924,752 32,811,850 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 6,432,724 2,850,649 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 10,600 2,792 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 60,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 477,449 196,026 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 76,428,076 35,665,292 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 76,905,525 35,861,318 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 450 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 25,873,834 7,766,605 Page 21 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 20,244,161 7,508,065 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1,751,254 6,211 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 47,869,249 15,281,330 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 29,036,276 20,579,988 100300 25 0359 CORONER E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 1,734,309 859,898 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,052,101 553,332 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 46,040 24,280 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,786,410 1,413,230 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,832,450 1,437,510 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 67,000 42,391 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 26,000 14,105 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 93,000 56,496 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 2,739,450 1,381,014 100300 25 0362 EMERGENCY SERVICES E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 6,177,130 2,598,636 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,307,521 1,019,610 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 3,500 6,167 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 1,615,832 324,753 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 333,880 176,585 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 10,103,983 3,949,166 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,437,863 4,125,751 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,869,811 255,687 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,550,685 1,367,483 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 2,000 11,419 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 4,422,496 1,634,589 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 6,015,367 2,491,162 113900 25 0368 TRAFFIC SAFETY E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 51,350 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 249,500 106 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 300,850 106 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 300,850 106 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 15,200 9,440 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 11,000 2,401 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 4,450 3,554 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 30,650 15,395 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 270,200 (15,289) 100300 30 0308 PROBATION PROGRAMS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 26,494,535 13,392,949 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,150,094 921,957 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 2,000 22,872 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 58,925 30,350 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (1,638,816) (120,717) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 28,705,554 14,368,128 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 27,066,738 14,247,411 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 7,294,902 2,001,164 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 644,797 306,382 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 3,147,262 1,124,987 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 11,086,961 3,432,533 Page 22 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 15,979,777 10,814,878 100300 30 0309 PROBATION FACILITIES E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 24,831,353 11,998,326 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,333,195 1,172,454 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 12,100 30,411 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 23,460 13,170 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 27,176,648 13,201,191 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 27,200,108 13,214,361 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 8,981,921 2,796,253 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 20,000 18,901 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 242,994 93,522 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 9,244,915 2,908,675 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 17,955,193 10,305,686 100300 30 0310 PROB CARE OF COURT WARDS E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,585,201 643,652 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 5,509,442 2,469,396 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 7,094,643 3,113,048 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 7,094,643 3,113,048 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,964,779 977,234 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,964,779 977,234 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 4,129,864 2,135,814 114300 30 0311 SLESF-PROBATION E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 3,361,294 1,030,093 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,361,294 1,030,093 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 40,000 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,388,221 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,428,221 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 933,073 1,030,093 114900 30 0313 PROBATION OFFICERS SPECIAL FUND E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 115,944 3,681 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 115,944 3,681 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 115,944 3,681 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 33,000 165,417 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 33,000 165,417 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 82,944 (161,736) 100300 33 0335 AGRICULTURE-WEIGHTS/MEAS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 4,318,918 2,106,128 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 469,385 226,250 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 19,949 9,949 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 448,818 230,518 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 4,808,252 2,342,327 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,257,070 2,572,845 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 25,000 11,770 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,394,896 534,595 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 841,150 81,843 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 30,000 11,405 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 3,291,046 639,614 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,966,024 1,933,231 Page 23 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 100300 36 0366 ANIMAL SERVICES E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 7,836,789 3,556,885 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,066,672 1,031,437 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 6,442 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 8,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 470,768 221,711 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 9,911,461 4,594,764 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,382,229 4,816,474 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 1,863,981 612,998 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 4,579,517 2,768,870 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 30,625 162,975 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 6,474,123 3,544,843 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 3,908,106 1,271,631 133200 36 0369 ANIMAL BENEFIT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 451,536 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 451,536 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 451,536 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 1,544 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 274 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 15,000 86,888 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 15,000 88,706 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 436,536 (88,706) 110300 38 0112 PLANT ACQ LAND DEV FUND E3000 OTHER CHARGES 328 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 18,000,000 34,559 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 18,000,000 34,887 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 18,000,000 34,887 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 18,000,000 34,887 110300 0341 BLDG INSP LAND DEVLPMNT E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 14,173,966 6,640,216 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 14,155,082 816,543 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,609,086 534,212 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 319,999 62,580 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 145,597 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 30,258,133 8,053,551 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 30,258,133 8,199,147 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 14,137,170 5,565,802 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 1,133,123 66,952 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 405,850 508,285 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 2,875,525 680,949 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 18,551,668 6,821,988 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 11,706,465 1,377,159 111900 38 0351 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 17,000 6,910 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 12,000 1,082 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 18,000 6,910 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 30,000 7,992 Page 24 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 30,000 (52,811) TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 30,000 (52,811) NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 60,803 110300 38 0352 COMM DEV-LAND DEVELOPMENT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,784,392 1,090,580 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 105,000 35,421 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 50,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 7,719,099 3,668,478 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,939,392 1,126,001 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,658,491 4,794,479 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 2,449,656 1,283,097 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 250,000 45,779 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 19,000 125 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 7,031,112 14,698,137 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 350,000 248,851 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 10,099,768 16,275,990 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 558,723 (11,481,511) 100300 38 0357 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 10,051,620 4,937,113 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,033,952 839,232 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 16,385 6,385 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (1,291,566) (527,469) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 12,101,957 5,782,730 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,810,391 5,255,261 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 21,693 280,172 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 10,352,813 4,382,508 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 10,374,506 4,662,680 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 435,885 592,581 110200 38 0367 GAME PROTECTION E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 362,193 (12,221) E3000 OTHER CHARGES 500 122 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 3,000 3,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 362,693 (12,099) TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 365,693 (9,099) R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 7,387 3,200 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 50,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 57,387 3,200 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 308,306 (12,299) 133700 38 0370 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 641,204 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,756,565 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,397,769 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,397,769 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 40,000 6,430 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 500,000 16,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 540,000 22,430 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,857,769 (22,430) 100300 38 0580 KELLER CNYN MTIGATN FUND Page 25 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 54,500 24,766 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,544,715 619,500 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 105,250 34,757 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,704,465 679,023 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,704,465 679,023 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 1,704,465 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 577,238 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,704,465 577,238 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 101,785 134700 38 0582 CDBG SM BUS&MICROENT LOAN E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 469,770 70 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 469,770 70 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 469,770 70 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 1,777 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 100,000 (58,321) TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 100,000 (56,544) NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 369,770 56,614 100300 38 0590 HOPWA GRANT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 809,163 16,705 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 809,163 16,705 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 809,163 16,705 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 809,163 (45,912) TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 809,163 (45,912) NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 62,617 100300 38 0592 HUD BLOCK GRANT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 5,676,411 2,089,569 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 750,000 291,529 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 6,426,411 2,381,099 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,426,411 2,381,099 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 6,410,411 2,409,348 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 16,000 2,100 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 6,426,411 2,411,448 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (30,349) 100300 38 0593 HUD EMERGENCY SHELTER GRT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 154,371 13,485 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 154,371 13,485 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 154,371 13,485 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 154,371 12,826 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 154,371 12,826 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 659 100300 38 0594 HUD HOME BLOCK GRANT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 4,813,452 2,236,008 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 4,813,452 2,236,008 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,813,452 2,236,008 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4,813,452 2,202,883 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 4,813,452 2,202,883 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 33,125 Page 26 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 111100 38 0595 PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 5,631,384 154,430 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 314,600 8,837 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 500,000 173,599 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 5,945,984 163,267 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,445,984 336,866 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 140,000 76,421 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 265,000 217,841 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1,000 329,858 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 406,000 624,121 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 6,039,984 (287,255) 111300 38 0596 AFFORDABLE HOUSING E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 3,792,930 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 350 123 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 3,793,280 123 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,793,280 123 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 192,700 42,962 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 192,700 42,962 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 3,600,580 (42,839) 134900 38 0597 HUD BLDG INSP NPP E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,232,672 528,089 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 275,000 2,993 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 10,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,507,672 531,082 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,517,672 531,082 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 10,000 3,633 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 750,000 7,046,536 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 750,000 291,529 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,510,000 7,341,699 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 7,672 (6,810,617) 134800 38 0598 CDBG 1ST-TIME HMBHR LOAN E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 163,442 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 6,000 2,100 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 163,442 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 169,442 2,100 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 6,000 183 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 110,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 116,000 183 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 53,442 1,917 110900 38 0663 TRANSPRTATN IMPV MEASURE C E3000 OTHER CHARGES 2,986,260 1,666,110 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 3,500 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,986,260 1,666,110 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,989,760 1,666,110 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 200,000 21,489 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,789,760 6,724,922 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,989,760 6,746,411 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (5,080,301) Page 27 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 113200 38 0664 PH BART GREENSPACE MTCE E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 74,187 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 65,000 24 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 26,814 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 139,187 24 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 139,187 26,838 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 6,000 1,979 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 50,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 6,000 51,979 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 133,187 (25,141) 100300 38 0701 PARKS ADMINISTRATION E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 42,743 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 42,743 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 42,743 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 42,743 0 100300 38 0591 HOUSING REHABILITATION E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 777,001 309,794 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 73,932 23,406 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 528 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 12,121 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 850,933 333,728 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 850,933 345,849 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 5,000 3,210 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 441 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 353,042 150 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 492,450 1,470 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 850,933 4,830 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 341,019 113400 40 0249 CCC DEPT CHILD SPPRT SVCS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 16,614,450 7,854,827 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 861,232 362,748 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 912,867 440,044 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 331 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 25,944 6,134 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 18,388,549 8,657,950 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 18,414,493 8,664,084 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY (3,463) R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 18,307,528 3,051,301 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 999 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 94,157 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 18,307,528 3,142,994 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 106,965 5,521,090 113300 42 0233 R/ESTATE FRAUD PROSECUTE E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 756,335 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 950,000 118,126 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 756,335 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,706,335 118,126 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 275,000 90,708 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 275,000 90,708 Page 28 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,431,335 27,418 113100 42 0234 DA FORFEITURE-FED-DOJ E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 137,661 6,347 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 50,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 187,661 6,347 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 187,661 6,347 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 640 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 640 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 187,661 5,707 114300 0241 SLESF-CRIM PROSECUTION E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 467,751 162,653 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 3,064 260 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 5,919 836 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 7,756 22 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 476,734 163,749 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 484,490 163,771 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 16,000 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 305,223 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 2,600 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 321,223 2,600 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 163,267 161,171 100300 42 0242 DISTRICT ATTORNEY E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 26,348,336 13,764,706 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,982,144 1,461,928 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 20,282 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (632,534)67,543 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 29,330,480 15,246,916 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 28,697,946 15,314,459 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 362,000 275,100 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 14,778,859 3,980,290 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 2,168,220 290,205 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 17,309,079 4,545,595 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 11,388,867 10,768,864 112900 42 0244 D A REVENUE NARCOTICS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 78,542 39,224 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 220,647 7,213 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 72 36 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 829,720 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 299,261 46,473 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,128,981 46,473 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 7,350 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 114,374 78,325 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 114,374 85,675 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 1,014,607 (39,202) 100300 42 0245 D A WELFARE FRAUD E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 196,291 217,381 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 48,265 13,773 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 600 Page 29 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (244,556) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 244,556 231,754 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 231,754 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 231,754 112400 42 0247 DA CONSUMER PROTECTION E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 220,201 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 220,201 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 220,201 R9300 FINES/FORFEITS/PENALTIES 258,600 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 258,600 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 220,201 (258,600) 100300 42 0364 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 278,902 139,515 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 34,301 11,439 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 313,203 150,954 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 313,203 150,954 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 150,000 260,530 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 150,000 260,530 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 163,203 (109,576) 113000 42 0251 DA ENVIRON/OSHA E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,702,175 1,131 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 335,500 90,053 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,702,175 1,131 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,037,675 91,184 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 2,037,675 91,184 100300 43 0243 PUBLIC DEFENDER E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 16,552,163 8,561,924 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,622,038 924,214 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 5,000 5,000 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 10,000 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (127,446)17,330 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 19,189,201 9,491,138 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 19,061,755 9,508,468 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 50,057 18,367 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 50,057 18,367 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 19,011,698 9,490,101 110800 65 0006 GENERAL ROAD FUND REVENUE R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 250,000 6,719 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 23,565,000 10,002,211 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 23,815,000 10,008,929 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC)(23,815,000) (10,008,929) 111000 65 0120 PLANT ACQ-SNS CRNT DRN FD E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 256,657 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 200 64 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 2,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 256,857 64 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 258,857 64 Page 30 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 7,000 3,480 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 10,200 2,398 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 17,200 5,879 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 241,657 (5,815) 110500 65 0161 SURVEY MONUMENT PRESERVTN E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 535,990 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 256 51 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 61,500 16,871 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 536,246 51 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 597,746 16,922 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 25,000 6,879 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 62,000 32,660 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 87,000 39,539 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 510,746 (22,617) 100300 65 0330 CO DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 584,100 311,527 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 32 57 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 1,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 584,132 311,584 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 585,132 311,584 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 19,583 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 585,132 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 585,132 19,583 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 292,001 112100 65 0350 CDD/PWD JOINT REVIEW FEE E3000 OTHER CHARGES 8,400 2,554 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 641,600 297,217 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 8,400 2,554 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 650,000 299,770 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 35,000 14,636 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 615,000 1,377,592 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 650,000 1,392,228 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (1,092,458) 123100 65 0631 HERCUL/RODEO/CROCK A OF B E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 10,000 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 250 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 85,128 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 10,250 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 95,378 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 9,000 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 41,000 1,648 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 50,000 1,648 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 45,378 (1,648) 123200 65 0632 WEST COUNTY AREA OF BENEF E3000 OTHER CHARGES 10 1 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 23,090 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 10 1 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 23,100 1 Page 31 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 100 35 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 21,000 7,724 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 21,100 7,759 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 2,000 (7,758) 123400 65 0634 NORTH RICHMOND AOB E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 118,550 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 450 69 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 3,000 664 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 119,000 69 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 122,000 733 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 30,000 14,058 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 92,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 122,000 14,058 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (13,325) 124000 65 0635 MARTINEZ AREA OF BENEFIT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 30,000 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 600 80 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 330,000 22,404 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 30,600 80 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 360,600 22,484 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 75,000 19,398 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 90,000 130,101 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 165,000 149,500 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 195,600 (127,016) 124100 65 0636 BRIONES AREA OF BENEFIT E3000 OTHER CHARGES 250 52 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 536,090 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 250 52 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 536,340 52 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 20,000 5,883 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 5,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 25,000 5,883 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 511,340 (5,831) 124200 65 0637 CENTRAL CO AREA/BENEFIT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 204,000 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,000 215 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 15,000 (1,954) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 205,000 215 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 220,000 (1,739) R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 150,000 57,452 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 70,000 4,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 220,000 61,452 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (63,191) 124300 65 0638 SO WAL CRK AREA OF BENEFT E3000 OTHER CHARGES 50 1 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 17,325 17,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 50 1 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 17,375 17,001 Page 32 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 250 14 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 15,000 17,481 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 15,250 17,495 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 2,125 (494) 126000 65 0641 ALAMO AREA OF BENEFIT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 204,300 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 700 139 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 65,000 13,389 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 205,000 139 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 270,000 13,528 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 70,000 24,203 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 200,000 34,662 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 270,000 58,865 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (45,337) 127000 65 0642 SOUTH CO AREA OF BENEFIT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 109,500 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 500 103 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 60,000 73,019 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 110,000 103 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 170,000 73,122 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 70,000 30,728 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 100,000 32,006 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 31,846 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 170,000 94,580 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (21,458) 128000 65 0643 PITTS/ANTIOCH AREA/BENEFT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 274 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 2,000 109 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 274 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,274 109 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 2,274 109 128100 65 0644 MARSH CRK AREA OF BENEFIT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 10,000 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 20 22 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 1,000 296 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 10,020 22 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 11,020 318 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 1,500 304 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,500 304 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 8,520 14 128200 65 0645 EAST COUNTY AREA OF BENEF E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 249,000 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,000 252 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 45,000 10,919 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 250,000 252 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 295,000 11,171 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 175,000 67,643 Page 33 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 120,000 14,181 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 295,000 81,824 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (70,653) 112200 65 0648 DRAINAGE DEFICIENCY E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 6,005,024 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,501,500 395 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 2,050,000 254,843 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 7,506,524 395 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 9,556,524 255,238 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 1,142,000 (980,813) R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 360,000 95,018 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 102,476 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,502,000 (783,319) NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 8,054,524 1,038,557 112300 65 0649 PUBLIC WORKS E3000 OTHER CHARGES 135,860 531,368 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 4,891,000 691,776 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 135,860 531,368 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,026,860 1,223,143 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 12,700 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 365,000 75,552 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 4,661,860 9,380,040 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 5,026,860 9,468,292 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (8,245,149) 100300 65 0650 PUBLIC WORKS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 35,846,689 16,677,800 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 8,967,736 4,108,830 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 75,000 51,747 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 54,000 10,729 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (7,170,892) (2,070,255) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 44,943,425 20,849,105 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 37,772,533 18,778,850 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE (88,274) R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,072,036 282,759 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 36,437,719 17,196,124 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 37,509,755 17,390,609 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 262,778 1,388,241 110300 65 0651 PUB WKS-LAND DEVELOPMENT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,106,250 151,654 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 85,000 3,727 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 5,000,000 1,686,143 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,191,250 155,381 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 6,191,250 1,841,524 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 395,000 147,573 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,071 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,780,000 632,530 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4,014,124 715,457 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 6,189,124 1,497,632 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 2,126 343,892 Page 34 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date 129000 65 0653 BETHEL ISLAND AREA OF BENEFT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 58,148 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 350 53 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 550,000 387 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 58,498 53 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 608,498 440 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 15,000 6,685 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 21,000 3,347 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 36,000 10,032 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 572,498 (9,592) 100300 65 0661 ROAD CONSTRUCTION E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 15,773,870 13,530,303 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 6,490,500 637,496 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 3,346 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 22,264,370 14,167,798 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 22,264,370 14,171,144 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 35,000 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 22,179,370 6,956,232 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 35,000 1,343,217 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 50,000 1,888 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 22,264,370 8,336,338 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 5,834,806 110800 65 0662 ROAD CONSTRUCTION-RD FUND E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 22,107,047 5,729,069 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 452,500 1,409,887 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 4,000,000 3,263,063 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 22,559,547 7,138,956 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 26,559,547 10,402,019 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 67,241 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 12,623,000 2,355,830 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 4,603,000 1,585,070 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 947,000 73,174 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 18,173,000 4,081,316 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 8,386,547 6,320,703 110800 65 0672 ROAD MAINTENANCE-RD FUND E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 4,280,971 3,296,312 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 2,139,190 387,249 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 1,116,455 138,206 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 12,592,581 7,292,861 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 7,536,616 3,821,767 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 20,129,197 11,114,629 R8980 FUND BALANCE 259,084 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,091,491 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 55,000 111,736 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1,820,790 535,952 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,134,874 1,739,178 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 17,994,323 9,375,451 110800 65 0674 MISCEL PROPERTY-ROAD FUND Page 35 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date E3000 OTHER CHARGES 2,000 97 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 12,500 3,129 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,000 97 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 14,500 3,226 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 7,000 3,660 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 7,000 3,660 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 7,500 (434) 110800 65 0676 GEN ROAD PLAN/ADM-RD FUND E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 423,050 95,773 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 940,100 197,008 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 3,254,350 1,664,180 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,363,150 292,781 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,617,500 1,956,961 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 206 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 5,000 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 276,000 20,265 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 662,500 64,939 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 943,500 85,409 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 3,674,000 1,871,552 138800 65 0678 SPRW FUND E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 4,834,523 11,693 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 350,000 261,451 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 1,700 3,791 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 5,184,523 273,144 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 5,186,223 276,935 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 533,000 85,334 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 50 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 533,000 85,384 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 4,653,223 191,551 139000 65 0680 RD DVLPMNT DISCOVERY BAY E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 12,700 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 300 48 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 5,000 129 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 13,000 48 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 18,000 177 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 13,000 3,959 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 5,000 3,943 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 18,000 7,903 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (7,726) 139200 65 0682 ROAD IMPRVMNT FEE E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,985,380 225,951 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 4,029 789 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 560,591 6,945 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,989,409 226,740 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,550,000 233,685 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 642,596 212,164 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 100,000 (164,780) R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 625,000 46,466 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 300,000 Page 36 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 1,667,596 93,850 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 882,404 139,835 139400 65 0684 RD DEVLPMNT RICH/EL SOBRT E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 87,600 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 400 47 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 7,000 2,664 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 88,000 47 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 95,000 2,711 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 20,000 2,706 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 75,000 19,068 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 95,000 21,774 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (19,063) 139500 65 0685 RD DEVLPMT BAY POINT AREA E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 79,650 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 350 105 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 80,000 8,213 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 80,000 105 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 160,000 8,318 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 35,000 12,116 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 125,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 160,000 12,116 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (3,798) 139900 65 0687 RD DEVLPMNT PACHECO AREA E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 10,000 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 300 93 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 35,000 9,103 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 10,300 93 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 45,300 9,196 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 21,000 5,905 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 1,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 22,000 5,905 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 23,300 3,291 111400 65 0697 NAVY TRANS MITIGATION E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 9,081,972 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 20,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 9,081,972 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 9,101,972 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 300,000 30,323 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 300,000 30,323 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 8,801,972 (30,323) 111500 65 0699 TOSCO/SOLANO TRANS MTGTN E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 181,000 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,000 228 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 18,000 (17,401) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 182,000 228 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 200,000 (17,173) R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 200,000 70,925 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 200,000 70,925 Page 37 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (88,098) 140100 65 0841 AIRPORT OPERATIONS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 2,135,653 1,083,398 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,051,602 465,852 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 788,031 340,343 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 222,000 136,354 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 3,975,286 1,889,593 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 4,197,286 2,025,947 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 3,596,584 1,961,691 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE (20,292) R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 7,176 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 458,162 217,327 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 4,054,746 2,165,902 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 142,540 (139,955) 140100 65 0843 AIRPORT FIXED ASSETS E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 1,410 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 2,566,000 137,351 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 2,566,000 138,760 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,566,000 138,760 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,434,375 562,955 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,434,375 562,955 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 131,625 (424,195) 100300 66 0020 PURCHASING E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 945,265 464,785 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 244,762 112,011 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (207,920) (75,924) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 1,190,027 576,796 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 982,107 500,872 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 143,544 71,772 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 108,327 8,480 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 251,871 80,252 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 730,236 420,620 150100 66 0064 ISF FLEET SERVICES E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 1,927,166 818,312 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 8,296,270 3,559,690 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 4,325,368 261,655 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 2,912,780 1,308,960 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (2,252,000) (589,436) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 17,461,584 5,948,617 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 15,209,584 5,359,181 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 12,107,404 42,054 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 189,400 6,041,451 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 12,296,804 6,083,506 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 2,912,780 (724,325) 100300 66 0063 FLEET SERVICES E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 10,874 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 298,530 322,023 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 226,804 Page 38 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date E4000 FIXED ASSETS 625,680 809,040 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (579,661) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 924,210 1,368,741 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 924,210 789,080 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES (1,791) R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 243,013 1,251 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 243,013 (541) NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 681,197 789,621 100300 66 0077 GEN CO BLG OCCUPANCY COST E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 12,620,098 7,824,209 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 61,447 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 12,620,098 7,824,209 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 12,620,098 7,885,656 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 73,001 36,920 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 3,920 4,966 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 94,388 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 76,921 136,273 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 12,543,177 7,749,383 100300 66 0078 GSD OUTSIDE AGENCY SVC E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 506,925 493,424 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 191,863 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 506,925 493,424 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 506,925 685,286 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 4,202 3,678 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 144,260 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 492,984 63,173 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 497,186 211,112 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 9,739 474,174 100300 66 0079 BUILDING MAINTENANCE E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 19,884,196 9,284,397 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 40,178,591 23,725,044 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 33,321,827 9,033,273 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 6,935 48,440 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (61,106,770) (27,420,576) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 93,391,549 42,091,155 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 32,284,779 14,670,579 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 31,978,679 17,489,204 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 306,100 1,114,360 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 32,284,779 18,603,564 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (3,932,985) 100300 66 0148 PRINT & MAIL SERVICES E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 1,722,753 745,867 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,795,279 1,452,653 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 50,953 33,216 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (4,053,155) (2,045,030) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 4,568,985 2,231,736 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 515,830 186,707 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 514,880 335,394 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 950 860 Page 39 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 515,830 336,254 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 (149,547) 100300 66 0149 GENERAL SERVICES ADMIN E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 4,121,496 1,941,234 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 384,651 201,177 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,500 1,647 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS (4,507,347) (1,868,888) GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 4,507,647 2,144,057 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 300 275,169 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 260,832 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 300 16 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 300 260,848 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 14,321 100300 66 0473 KELLER SRCHRGE/MITGN PROG E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 395,546 317,537 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 395,546 317,537 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 395,546 317,537 R9200 LICENSE/PERMIT/FRANCHISES 335,546 80,327 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 60,000 50,896 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 395,546 131,223 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 0 186,314 120600 85 0008 REVENUE CO LIBRARY TAXES R9000 TAXES CURRENT PROPERTY 20,669,927 20,437,650 R9100 TAXES OTHER THAN CUR PROP (5,236)3,929 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 831,536 104,581 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 21,496,227 20,546,159 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC)(21,496,227) (20,546,159) 120600 85 0113 PLANT ACQUIS-LIBRARY FUND E4000 FIXED ASSETS 800,328 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 800,328 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 800,328 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 800,328 0 120600 85 0620 LIBRARY-ADMIN & SUPPORT SVCS E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 8,073,730 3,652,915 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 3,264,975 1,462,709 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,128,657 420,907 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 178,632 73,756 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 32,412 17,106 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 12,645,994 5,610,287 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 12,678,406 5,627,393 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 68,000 23,420 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 529,967 102,132 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 129,917 10,200 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 1,451,280 38,623 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 2,179,164 174,374 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 10,499,242 5,453,019 120600 85 0621 LIBRARY-COMMUNITY SERVICES Page 40 of 41 Mid-Year Budget Status Report Attachment B Fund Agency Current Year Adjusted Budget Total Year-to-Date E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 12,038,143 5,914,278 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 2,253,750 847,084 E3000 OTHER CHARGES 1,681,497 1,070,415 E4000 FIXED ASSETS 900,000 140,944 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 16,873,390 7,972,721 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 16,873,390 7,972,721 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 205 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,445,300 498,729 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 917,100 369,840 R9800 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 215,600 217,421 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 3,578,000 1,086,195 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 13,295,390 6,886,526 120700 85 0622 CASEY LIBRARY GIFT E3000 OTHER CHARGES 258,035 5 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 258,035 5 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 258,035 5 R9400 USE OF MONEY & PROPERTY 8,000 606 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 8,000 606 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 250,035 (601) 100300 95 0579 VETERANS SERVICE OFFICE E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 657,746 318,339 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 79,460 29,494 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 737,206 347,833 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 737,206 347,833 R9500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 95,000 57,500 R9600 CHARGES FOR SERVICES 50,000 TOTREV GROSS REVENUE 145,000 57,500 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 592,206 290,333 100300 95 0630 COOPERATIVE EXTENSION SVC E1000 SALARIES AND BENEFITS 275,262 146,706 E2000 SERVICES AND SUPPLIES 26,285 11,103 E5000 EXPENDITURE TRANSFERS 29,256 10,261 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 301,547 157,809 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 330,803 168,070 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 330,803 168,070 100300 99 0990 CONTINGNCY APPROP-GENERAL E6000 PROVISIONS FOR CONTINGENCIES 10,000,000 GRSCST GROSS EXPENDITURES 10,000,000 TOTEXP TOTAL EXPENDITURES 10,000,000 NETCOST NET COUNTY COST (NCC) 10,000,000 0 Page 41 of 41 Attachment C 100300 GENERAL FUND 115100 PROPERTY TAX ADMIN 104100 REVENUE FUND COUNTY SERVICE AREA 115200 VLF SECURITIZATION FUND 105600 COUNTY LAW ENFRCMT-CAP PROJ 115500 IHSS PUBLIC AUTHORITY 105700 JUSTICE FACILITY CONSTRUCTION 115600 DNA IDENTIFICATION FUND 105800 JUVENILE HALL -CAP PROJ 120600 COUNTY LIBRARY 105900 ELLINWOOD CAP-PROJ 120700 CASEY LIBRARY GIFT 110000 RECORDER MODERNIZATION 123100 HERCUL/RODEO CROCK A OF B 110100 COURT / CLERK AUTOMATION 123200 WEST COUNTY AREA OF BENEF 110200 FISH AND GAME 123300 KENSINGTON AREA OF BENEFT 110300 LAND DEVELOPMENT FUND 123400 NORTH RICHMOND AOB 110400 CRIMINALISTICS LABORATORY 124000 MARTINEZ AREA OF BENEFIT 110500 SURVEY MONUMENT PRESERVTN 124100 BRIONES AREA OF BENEFIT 110600 CRIM JUSTICE FACILITY CONSTR 124200 CENTRAL CO AREA/BENEFIT 110700 COURTHOUSE CONSTRUCTION 124300 SO WAL CRK AREA OF BENEFT 110800 ROAD 124400 BOGUE RANCH AREA OF BENEF 110900 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT 125000 LAMORINDA AREA OF BENEFIT 111000 SANS CRAINTE DRAINAGE 126000 ALAMO AREA OF BENEFIT 111100 PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND 127000 SOUTH CO AREA OF BENEFIT 111200 PH-BART TRANSIT PLANNING 128000 PITTS/ANTIOCH AREA/BENEFT 111300 AFFORDABLE HOUSING SPEC REV 128100 MARSH CRK AREA OF BENEFIT 111400 NAVY TRANS MITIGATION 128200 EAST COUNTY AREA OF BENEF 111500 TOSCO/SOLANO TRNS MITIGATION 128300 BRENTWOOD AREA OF BENEFIT 111600 CHILD DEVELOPMENT FUND 128400 DELTA EXPRESSWAY DEV FEES 111700 TRANS IMPRVMNT-RODEO/CROCKETT 129000 BETHEL ISL AREA OF BENEFT 111800 HUD NSP 131800 CRIM JUSTICE AUTOMATION 111900 USED OIL RECYCLING GRANT 132800 COUNTY CHILDRENS 112000 CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT 133200 ANIMAL BENEFIT 112100 CDD/PWD JOINT REVIEW FEE 133400 CO-WIDE GANG AND DRUG 112200 DRAINAGE DEFICIENCY 133700 LIVABLE COMMUNITIES FUND 112300 PUBLIC WORKS 134000 AVA SERVICE AUTHORITY 112400 D A CONSUMER PROTECTION 134700 CDBG SM BUS&MICROENT LOAN 112500 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE VICTIM ASST 134800 CDB 1ST-TIME HMEBYR LOAN 112600 DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM 134900 HUD BLDG INSP NPP 112700 ZERO TOLRNCE-DOM VIOLENCE 135000 RETIREMENT UAAL BOND FUND 112800 D A REVENUE SEIF 135100 NATURAL DISASTER 112900 D A REVENUE NARCOTICS 135200 RET LITGTN STLMNT DBT SVC 113000 D A ENVIRONMENT/OSHA 136000 CENTRAL IDENTIFY BUREAU 113100 DA FORFEITRE-FED-DOJ 138800 SPRW FUND 113200 PH BART GREENSPACE MTCE 138900 EAST/CENT TRAVEL CORRIDOR 113300 R/ESTATE FRAUD PROSECUTE 139000 RD DVLPMNT DISCOVERY BAY 113400 CCC DEPT CHILD SPPRT SVCS 139100 RD DVLPMNT BISHOP RANCH 113500 EMERGENCY MED SVCS FUND 139200 ROAD IMPRVMNT FEE 113600 PROP 36-SUB ABUSE CP ACT 139300 RD DEVELOPMENT OAKLEY 113700 AB75 TOBACCO TAX FUND 139400 RD DEVLPMNT RICH/EL SOBRT 113800 PROP 10-CSAS SPECIAL REV 139500 ROAD DEVELOPMENT BAY POINT 113900 TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND 139600 RD DEVELOP CROW CANYON 114000 PUB PROTECT-SPEC REV FUND 139900 RD DEVLPMNT PACHECO AREA 114100 SHERIFF NARC FORFEIT-ST/LOCAL 140100 AIRPORT ENTERPRISE 114200 SHERIFF FORFEIT-FED-DOJ 142000 SHERIFF LAW ENF TRNG CNTR 114300 SUP LAW ENFORCEMENT SVCS 142500 CHILDCARE ENTERPRISE 114400 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BJP 145000 HOSPITAL ENTERPRISE 114500 SHERIFF FORFEIT-FED TREASURY 145100 REGENCY HILLS HOSPITAL ENTERPRISE 114600 PROP 63 MH SVCS ACCT 145200 CREEKSIDE SNF HOSPITAL ENTERPRISE 114700 PRISONERS WELFARE FUND 146000 HMO ENTERPRISE 114800 COMM COLL CHILD DEV-FUND 146100 HMO ENTERPRISE-COMM PLAN 114900 PROBATION OFFICERS SPECIAL FUND 146200 MAJOR RISK MED INSUR ENT 115000 AUTOMATED SYS DVLPMNT 150100 FLEET ISF List of Funds ATTACHMENT D COUNTY WIDE EMPLOYEE COST SAVINGS SUGGESTIONS A. SUGGESTIONS THAT COULD BE IMPLEMENTED IMMEDIATELY 1. Fund and implement a county hot line for employees and the public to report waste, fraud or other matters concerning county resources. 2. Closely review the county's interpretation of FMLA. Many employees use this to not come to work. Supervisors can't discipline or correct behavior. Impossible to run a business with inadequate and inconsistent staffing. 3. Overhaul of the whole administrative and Personnel process, which presently functions in a 19th century model in response to 21st century environment. Have Health Service clerical and Personnel completely separate from downtown to speed efficiency responsiveness and relevancy . 4. Sponsor County employee exercise program. County can charge for the service and those who participate will hopefully be more healthy and have fewer sick days. 5. Reduce the time for inquiry of public information to 10 minutes and charge any time spent by staff for more than 10 minutes; or increase the rate charge for any time spent by staff over 15 minutes. Enforce charging over the allotted time. 6. The county could save money by requiring all meetings that can take place by phone or video conference to be held that way instead of employees driving to meetings offsite and charging the county mileage. 7. Study countywide finance departments and systems to update the processes and make use of technology and staffing. The processes surrounding the Auditor’s office and Treasurers office are cumbersome and difficult. 8. Market services to cities and agencies with a business plan that ensures full funding for services provided. The flip side is to review current marketing of services to ensure County service does not suffer due to services provided to outside agencies. 9. Along the same line as above item. Why do County Departments need to pay overdraft charges against funds that are inadequate to provide the services expected? It seems there must be a solution to this waste for programs that are obviously woefully underfunded. FACILITIES 10. Turn off the refrigeration units in the old water fountains in all of the office buildings. We have bottled water coolers that most people use, so the basic tap-water water fountains are rarely used, and the refrigeration units in these are old, likely non energy-efficient, and burn a lot of electricity. The water fountain on this floor lets such a small amount of water out of it that it is completely unusable to anything but a micro-organism, to get any water out of it you'd have to put some major ATTACHMENT D suction on it for quite a while to get anywhere near enough water for a swallow, and it's been that way for at least the last 15 years. We might as well shut it off. 11. Initiate rolling "brown outs" - cycle the heat and air conditioning to be off 1 hour every so-many- hours. We'd probably never know or feel the difference. Try this as a pilot project in 1 building. 12. Modify building temperature two degrees. 13. Two times a week employees empty their own trash containers. 14. Expand GSD facilities and fleet services to the Housing Authority 15. I've noticed that maintenance will empty the trash cans, no matter if the can has one piece of paper in it or is full to the brim...this would be OK except for the fact that each time the trash can is emptied the plastic liner is also removed (even when there is only a paper or two in it)...with plastic bags seemingly taking over much of our landfills, I think waiting until the trash is full before emptying and putting in a new plastic liner makes more sense...this might not save much money, but it sure would help the environment... 16. Turn off all lights and fans in county buildings. I live in Martinez and drive by the county buildings with ALL the lights on. Especially the new District Attorney's office. Turn off computers, left on overnight which needlessly uses electricity. 17. Install motion detectors to turn on restroom lights. 18. I have a proposal to save the hospital a large sum of money by generating power using a hydro energy plant. I've been working with a company from Utah that specializes in hydro energy and they have expressed that they could save the hospital millions in energy costs over time. I am in the process of getting the information together to get it in front of you. However, I do need some help to be able to have accurate information for you. I need a history of power bills for the hospital for one year. The information I need is costs (highs and lows) and rates for one full year. How this works is the plant will be tied in to the water supply thru the pipelines which will turn turbines of the energy plant, thereby producing the energy from the hospitals own water supply. This is obviously a very simple explanation but there will be more detailed information in the formal proposal. The $60 million shortfall is a huge number to overcome, so I think the county needs a savings plan that will bring large amounts of savings very quickly, and cut down the debt and overhead costs. The benefits are many, but I think the money being saved in energy costs is the primary one. I look forward to working with you and please contact me to get me the energy costs of one full year, so I can get the figures to the power plant company. 19. Make better use of the county space we have now. Examine large empty spaces in any buildings that can be used to rearrange staff. For example, PHC has several conference rooms, do they really need that much space? Examine areas where perhaps we can put prefab mobile type offices behind existing county buildings for space, instead of expensive leases from privately owned buildings. Evaluate building space utilization/consolidate where possible. RECYCLING/GREEN PROGRAMS 20. Increase recycling efforts. ATTACHMENT D 21. Recycling garbage, landfill impact concepts; I have reduced the garbage output, and domestic bill, by recycling and reducing my landfill contributions, does this not work for the county as well? In Richmond, we'd tried initiating a recycling program, I arranged for all of the recycling bins for the clinic, but the public at large had no idea what they were throwing where, so they were removed; this was about 5 years ago. Is there a better educational program for the City of Richmond for recycling, which the health center could tap into? Is this an issue county wide? 22. Suspend the Green programs as they tend to cost more. 23. Look into purchasing and installing solar panels for energy for all county facilities/ buildings. FLEET 24. Limit the number of County Vehicles and have a reservation system (similar to conference rooms) to sign out the cars. Hopefully this will force people to carpool, plan their schedules accordingly, and/or limit the trips they have to make out of the office. Less maintenance on the vehicles and other operating costs. 25. Have General Services conduct facility landscape maintenance on as as-needed rather than regular schedule. Every week someone is here to prune the atriums when the effort could be diverted to other areas of the County. 26. Establish liaison person to monitor shop repairs, costs and down time. 27. Move the custodians back to the graveyard shift. They can work much quicker if staff is not here to get in the way or to converse with. Also does the trash really need to be emptied once a day, what about every other day? 28. Switch out aging county cars to hybrid ones! Use CNG/electric vehicles – lower fuel costs. 29. I also wonder if we need as many county cars as we have available. I see many just sitting in parking lots and car costs add up. In our back lot (Health Services) has several county cars that look like they don’t always get used. Would it be wise to do a study and see how much time is actually needed in the vehicles and possibly sell off 25% or so of the cars? That would be great cost savings on maintenance, registration and insurance costs. 30. Suspend any commuting use of county vehicles, if any. Stop allowing the use of county cards to drive back and forth to work. Departments should require their workers to drive their own car to the lot and then drive a county card for jobs. 31. Consider restricting or eliminating use of County vehicles for commuting to and from home. 32. Reduce the use of home-garaged vehicles. 33. No county vehicles to be used for commuting out of the county. 34. Eliminate all subsidized County car and vanpools ATTACHMENT D POSITION MANAGEMENT/STAFFING 35. Eliminate unfunded vacant positions 36. Purge management positions (there are way too many managers) 37. Re-evaluate and scrutinize all the “assistants” people have in their departments. 38. Look at employees in full-time positions who consistently work less than 40 hours per week, and adjust their positions/benefits to correspond to the number of hours they are actually working. This should save money in benefits. 39. Streamline the recruiting process to eliminate multi step duplicative process between department personnel offices and human resources. Also work with personnel to streamline interview process. Screen the applications down to a manageable list size. Lots of staff time is invested in the interview process. 40. Change County Temps to part time no more than 30 hours a week.. 41. Verify employee work schedules and that the forms are accurate. Also confirm by supervisor verification that employees are adhering to their agreed upon schedule by requiring accountability. 42. Investigate use of overtime, looking for planned use in lieu of staff. Eliminate/reduce overtime. 43. Do not require outside recruiting when there are qualified in-house candidates. 44. Maximize usage of inmate crew and duties. 45. Juvenile crews could/should be used for fine litter removal on roadsides. AUTOMATION/ON-LINE RESOURCES/IMAGING 46. Would it be possible to automate the Annual Charity Campaign? A huge amount of staff time and paper resources are devoted to this worthy cause. It would be great if employees could view the campaign booklet and local charities on line and complete an automated form! 47. I just got my W-2 in yesterdays mail. If they were handed out with our 1/25/09 paychecks, the county could save several hundred in postage costs. Perhaps that could be implemented next year. 48. The County should also look at streamlining the payroll process. The current system is very costly in terms of paper and person hours to process. The software used by Health Services Payroll is actually designed for a bi-weekly payroll system. Switching to a bi-weekly payroll may make it easier for employees to absorb any pay cuts or increases in benefit costs. 49. Get rid of time sheets and only submit negative reporting for absences or make time sheets electronic like our CCHS contracting process so it can interface with payroll software. 50. Develop new business models that maximize “e-gov” initiatives ATTACHMENT D 51. Make sure everything is on line with easy access-I can't tell you how often people still use 411 when phone numbers are on line. Use email to distribute memos, letter, cc:, etc. instead of hard copies. 52. Open enrollment. Have it on-line. Do not create packets, create an HR kiosk with computer access to computers. I suspect I could type it faster than I could write it. Currently it is charged to the CAO’s office. 10,000 copies @ $1.09 per copy (staff time – 60 hours, printing and graphics); $.64 per copy without staff time. Print and mail service outsource the graphics and printing. 53. Send out Employee Wellness Newsletter online only. 54. Also when open enrollment comes around, I get so much literature from the county in the US mail. Perhaps a generic email can go out to all employees stating that if you want the information, request it and it can be sent via transmittal to your department. I just throw mine away because I'm not interested in changing my health plan, so not only is the cost of postage a factor, but also the cost of printing the information. 55. On line or electronic employee evaluations. 56. Investigate cost savings of using an imaging process instead of maintaining paper archive files. 57. Reduce off-site file storage. Storage and file retrieval cost is increasing. One way to eliminate or reduce our storage cost is by scanning documents. A number of the County's larger departments have been able to securing funding for scanning equipment and are benefiting from this technology. However, there is nothing currently available for small departments. Helping small departments reduce their filing and storage cost should considered in this budget cycle. 58. Use imaging system/web based application to transmit Accounts Payable documents/invoices for processing. 59. Create web based application to electronically transmit finance documents to the Auditor’s office for processing. 60. Utilize website for services (park permits, solicitations, community center rentals, streetlight reporting tracking, etc.) 61. Web based project tracking & projected completion dates. 62. Use online services for communications with other Departments. Setting up a website, will save considerable time and effort. One can more efficiently conduct business; organize contracts, share documents with employees or contracts, even when you’re out of the office. 63. Using the Automated BOS Agenda process, identify other functions that can be automated or use web based programs to streamline time/costs. Since the board orders are electronic, we can also send electronic copies via email to all the cc’s and only print a hard copy for filing purposes. 64. We should think about getting copies of Adobe Acrobat for the clericals within each division so the board documents can be saved and stored efficiently. This would also help with interdepartmental communication as it would reduce the need to send everything via hard copies and interoffice mail ATTACHMENT D through GSD (for example: draft COA’s could be reviewed and created using Adobe and then only the final copy would be a hard copy). 65. Use email software to track schedules and tasks which can improve our performance. Most people are good at creating to-do or task lists, but often become distracted and don’t commit to a scheduled time to accomplish those tasks. By utilizing the task and reminder functions of an email program, one can set up a calendar that generates alerts, whether annual, weekly or daily. 66. Monitor/restrict computer use and websites. Charge employees for using county time to book air line tickets, order clothing, do their banking, etc. We need to keep these employees busy so they don't have time to play on the computer. 67. Eliminate hard-copy reference materials, to the extent electronic references area available and adequate for fieldwork. 68. Implement the use of an electronic timesheet to reduce the cost of printing timesheets that are duplicates, and to improve timeliness and efficiency of timesheet submissions and corrections. 69. Stop issuing physical pay stubs for employees who do not get checks – this process was tested and works – implement it or replace with online and telephone access to pay stub information. 70. Develop a procedure for expense checks to be direct deposited into accounts like paycheck. 71. Create opportunities for the community to complete applications and processes on-line. 72. Create an on-line application for processing HR forms. 73. Develop or purchase a procedures online template (that becomes the standard so that agencies have a format on how to move from binders to on-line access to procedures. 74. When providing results of testing or testing schedules, ask for an email address instead of a mailing address. 75. Use and open up access to the PeopleSoft application to its fullest extend. 76. Negotiate with existing media storage firm to establish County-wide service contract.3 77. Conduct a Direct Deposit Campaign to reduce the number of checks issued; send payment advices via email or post to a website that employees can access their information if they want. 78. Implement shared database for responding to incidents between departments. Often illicit discharges, complaints, etc., originate with other departments and info needs to be routed to numerous other divisions/departments. Streamline our County-wide referral process. 79. Focus our mission critical operations. For example: a more defined department-wide IT approach from current splintered approach. 80. Use projector to present meeting instead of printing and distributing hard copy handouts. ATTACHMENT D TRAVEL/TRAINING 81. Eliminate in-county meal reimbursement for managers/staff that attend meetings or trainings within county limits. 82. Raise number of miles you must accumulate before you can submit a Mileage Demand. Right now it’s 20 miles (that’s $11.00). I know it costs much more than that to process the check. 83. Pay county travel/employee demands quarterly instead of monthly. The cost of processing a warrant is approximately $19. Considering that most travel is now prohibited I don’t think it would be a lot to have employees wait a few months to be reimbursed for smaller mileage checks. 84. Reduce staff recruiting trips (Cal, UC Berkeley….) 85. Limit travel/training to local/critically essential courses. Review training and travel requests with budget constraints in mind. 86. Review training needs; fund only IIPP mandatory training, review staff training requirements and needed training. BUDGET AND FINANCE 87. Review the overhead budget within the Department and educate Department staff on the consequences of this expense. 88. Eliminate some of the divisional breakouts of expenditures. At the very least review the need for tracking costs on a divisional level for some costs (i.e. Computers). 89. Continue to refine our Program Budget process to make it a more relevant document. 90. Financing Deal Team. Establish a team to oversee financing deals, to ensure that the responsible staff negotiates the best business deal on behalf of the County. 91. Napa CAO is diligently working on creating a County-wide initiative to ensure the utmost accountability, transparency and efficacy by continuously reporting on the entire County and relating that reporting to the annual budget, so that constituents can see where money is being allocated and why – based on results. 92. Explore another POB transaction if feasible. ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT 93. Hope you can still get this one in - it's a proven program I would like to recommend that the County implement the Six Sigma/DMAIC process (a strategy used by many corporations to focus on process improvement and the reduction of variation and cost). In some cases, the improvements/ changes implemented would be transparent or improve the services we provide to the residents in our community. Within our department we have begun to improve efficiencies by reviewing the current workflows and making modifications, which have reduced paperwork and in turn will reduce expenses. If each department would take the initiative to review and analyze their current ATTACHMENT D workflows, the improvements and cost savings could have a substantial impact on our current working environment. 94. Establish a Performance Management System which can be a great tool to assist in program reduction decisions and to identify where the County gets the biggest bang for the buck. In order for such a system to be effective it normally needs to include not just programs but administrative functions as well. 95. Hire consulting firm to do a job audit on higher paying jobs to ensure county is getting full time work for a full time job. This may allow for some consolidating of positions, thereby saving money. 96. County should hire an outside private agency to do a complete audit of all County Departments. The audit would include how projects/divisions can run more efficiently, eliminate certain positions that are non-essential or could be handled by one person, etc. 97. Evaluate the Department’s organizational structure to minimize overhead costs. 98. Review each department’s organizational structure and department programs. 99. Establish an “Office of Organizational Management and Accountability” within the CAO. CELL PHONES 100. What about decreasing the number of cell phones and just offer a discount to those employees who use their own phones to do business. This would cost less then paying a monthly bill, insurance, and the cost for the phones as well. 101. Develop uniformity in purchasing and plans for cell phones. 102. Curtail county paid cell phone use. Develop a countywide policy that defines appropriate use of cell phones limited to public protection or other critical safety functions. All other county paid cell phones should be discontinued. CONTRACTING 103. Investigate current county contracts to decide whether or not they are beneficial to county savings. 104. Oversight. Require each department to have a person assigned to oversee department contracts, including the development of the contract and review of monthly billings. Any retroactive contract, request for “ratification,” extension of the term of a contract or of the amount of the contract should be accompanied by a memo explaining the necessity for this action. Observations of current practices: many departments assign the contracting process to clerks to prepare, who generally are not equipped or inclined to exercise judgment as to the terms. Contracts, including price and other essential terms, are not negotiated. Services are not monitored. Sometimes a department may be contracting for four tasks, and the contract limit is reached (to their surprise) after only the first task is completed. Work is started before a contract is even drafted, making it impossible to negotiate the terms. ATTACHMENT D AFFIRMATIVE ACTION/SBE 105. The SBE program needs to be simplified. A lot of staff time (cost and delays) is spent jumping through hoops to get what we need to provide quality service to our customers. 106. Allow the department to execute PO up to $500 without either SBE or Outreach requirements. 107. One idea is to increase the maximum amount of a professional services contract awarded to a SBE counts towards meeting a Dept. SBE goal. Right now it’s $50K ($25K for construction contracts). If we doubled that we could issue less professional services on-call contracts. Since each contract takes several hours to draft, review (internally), refine, and review (externally) this could save several thousands of dollars per contract. 108. Create a database for SBE/Outreach/Amendments and Renewals where departments can submit yearly vs. 6 months. Data generated should be integrated with the email programs; and later to the Reports submitted to the I.O. Committee. 109. Since the Board adopted Ord. 2008-07 allowing the CAO to approve service contract up to $100K; and we are going through a solicitation process already, it doesn’t seem like much of a stretch to increase the payment limit of our on-call contracts to the $100K limit. If we are parsing out work to promote the SBE program, the Board could also determine contracts up to $100K are subject to the SBE process. Fewer but larger projects seem likely to be more efficient. PRINTING 110. Encourage (direct) departments to restrain as much as possible the printing of electronic communications and attachments. 111. Reducing paper usage, double-sided printing/copies or distribute electronically via email and only print fax confirmation when needed. 112. Set computers to default to double-sided printing on printers and networked copiers (multi- functional devices) and facilitate the connection between the new copiers and the networks for departments that request this function. Singled-sided printing will still be available, if necessary, by choosing this option in the print menu on your computer 113. Policy to require that bids, quotes, proposals and other documents be submitted double-sided to the maximum extent possible. 114. I would like to see this publication as a pdf file and available online. I believe a lot of publications and newsletters can be changed to electronic reduce costs. 115. I would like to propose that the county stop printing expensive publications like the "County Clips". TELECOMMUTING ATTACHMENT D 116. Create or encourage a telecommuting program when appropriate, to reduce need for County facilities for the entire workforce. 117. One day of telecommuting per week has the potential to reduce overhead costs. 118. Allow telecommuting. Allow clinical personnel (nurses) in positions where calling patients is required to work from home (contacting patients during evening hours will increase productivity). Allow computer access from home. TELECOMMUNICATIONS 119. Switch to a VOIP (voice over internet protocol) telephone system. We have this at home and it is VERY inexpensive. Example: SKYPE 120. Eliminate music played while on hold (if there is a phone charge for this) 121. Remove 411 access from all phone lines. I believe it costs about $1.75 per call. 122. Work more closely with cities to share cost efficiencies especially in law enforcement relative to arrest, booking and detention costs...convene a county-wide group which includes law enforcement, medical, mental health, emergency services, etc. to develop county-wide policies that will increase efficiency and effectiveness for all involved relative to chronic system users. (you can take advantage of a structure already in place called the multidisciplinary committee run by Central County Mental Health). WORKERS COMPENSATION 123. Review our Worker's Comp policies and procedures. Why are we granting worker's comp to employees that were hurt doing something that is not in their job description? Example: under desk trying to catch a cricket; employee has been off for 2 months. Why don't we investigate the validity of claims? There are employees (usually problem employees) that have multiple claims. Makes it hard to run a business, provide timely patient care and brings down morale when we have inadequate staffing due to worker's comp claims. PURCHASING/SUPPLIES/OFFICE MANAGEMENT/MAIL 124. Streamline the process of creating an Open P.O., and make it easier to extend them. Once an Open P.O. is created, other departments should be able to piggy-back on them easily. There are vendors used by a lot of different departments (Ace Hardware, for example). I’m sure there are a lot of services and supplies we have in common to other departments. 125. Four departments purchase large amounts of food – Health Services, Probation, Sheriff, EHSD, Community Services Bureau (Head Start, etc.) Might there be any savings by combining those functions or coordinating them? 126. Refillable pens and pencils. 127. Minimize or eliminate overnight mail deliveries. Coordinate department-wide for courier services to outside agencies. ATTACHMENT D 128. I’m not really sure where the print mail services cardstock calendars are coming from ...they are pretty and I enjoy them but we are already provided with desk calendars. These may be an unnecessary expense. 129. Ban NCR Forms 130. We need to standardize ordering office supplies, computer equipment, etc. We need to standardize working materials. Not, I want a green pen or I want purple paper, larger computer screen or faster printer, special pens. It is obviously nice to have the cute little extras, but in these financial times we need to watch the ordering. During my employment at Santa Clara County and Alameda County, we rarely got to order pens and notebooks, and when we did, it was the least expensive item. 131. Freeze on purchase of new office furniture. Disallow the ordering of new furniture/office equipment when the necessary items, although not as nice, are available (which is most of the time) in surplus. Ideally, I propose a shared central bank (file) that stores and sorts information on what items are available, where the item is located, and when the item will be sent to surplus if there are no takers. The concept is similar to placing an ad on Craigslist or better yet, freecycle.org, which you can describe the item and even attach a picture. 132. Freeze on purchasing new computers, cell phones, printers, and copiers. 133. Replace copiers with one that has the capability to scan. I believe that if we did invest in this capability, we then could save money by not having to fax back and forth between offices. 134. Establish countywide copier standards. 135. Standardize envelopes to just a few sizes and color. When designing envelopes, remember to think of using bar coding as a way to handle return mail. 136. Current best practice for government agency paper purchasing is to select at least 35% post- consumer content to support environmental goals. If departments purchasing virgin copy paper switched to the Office Depot 10% post-consumer recycled content copy paper, they will see some small savings. 137. Encourage all employees to identify ways in which we can cut down our paper usage by at least 25% through reviewing the need for copies and by making all copies or prints double-sided, which will save the County significant dollars. At the end of the fiscal year, analyze the implementation of best practices by agencies and departments to measure our progress. All reduction in paper use will reduce expenditures. 138. There are also costs associated with recycling the discarded papers and energy use for copiers and printers. 139. Eliminate departmental newspaper subscriptions. 140. Before new furniture is ordered, see if what is already there or available in storage would suffice. Most county offices do not have people coming in. Most meetings are held in the conference ATTACHMENT D rooms. There is no need to impress in these stringent financial times when life-saving services are being cut, along with people's jobs. 141. When I was at the storage facility, I noticed a lot of computers, electric typewriters, office furniture, etc. outside and exposed to the weather and thus damaged beyond repair. Had they been stored properly inside, they could have been used by non-profits, students, or sold to bring in some money. If not, they need to be sent over to an e-waste facility. The storage area is a disgraceful mess. Get someone over to clean up and organize the storage area so there will be an accurate inventory of what is available and either re-issue the older computers where they can be used, or sell, donate or trash them. Hiring someone to repair computers or paint furniture would be a lot less expensive than buying fancy cherry wood. B. SUGGESTIONS REQUIRING POLICY DIRECTION OR BOARD ACTION 1. For some specific charges, allow exemptions for County Departments. For instance, one County Department should not have to pay the Recorders Office for County business recording charges or County owned parcels paying penalties for taxes on a parcel. 2. Employees on a Leave of Absence will be required to apply for COBRA after 9 months until they return back to work BUDGET REDUCTIONS 3. Look for ways to target general fund expenditures reductions and not just apply across the board cuts to employees. Allow Departments flexibility as to how to make general fund cuts. Some may reduce salaries some may reduce positions. Those departments who do not have significant general fund may be able to be ok. 4. Across–the-board reductions or furloughs may be politically expedient, but for a large number of programs, they could actually be very wasteful of program services resources while not actually saving County dollars. 5. Minimize across the board freezes and cuts and emphasize strategic cuts. Holding back hiring and implementation of non general fund programs is disruptive, expensive, and wasteful in the longer run. 6. Require the health care system to be self-supporting (start reducing GF subsidy) HIRING/STAFFING 7. Impose a temporary moratorium on promotions that include a salary increase. 8. Stop using Apple temp agency workers for administrative assistants. This may seem like an inexpensive option at first but having multiple assistants in a short period of time is senseless. My time to orient them is costly. Their skill level is not adequate (although 1 person was very dedicated she left due to lack of benefits and permanent position). Their sense of "ownership" or dedication is not present. Hire a benefited person who will take pride in their job. Spend more to save more (in ATTACHMENT D terms of time saved and quality of work). You may want to check the history of length of time temp workers have spent in various positions and note the high turnover rate. 9. Reduce or eliminate the use of outside Contractors and Contract Agency Temps if in-house resources are available. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS 10. NO FOOD POLICY. Set a good example to all and start with the BOS lunch!!! 11. Reduce BOS recent wage increase by 50%. 12. Schedule Board meetings twice per month. 13. Suspend weekly Board meetings. The Board should meet no more than monthly or possibly quarterly. The Board should delegate authority to make most decisions that are currently acted on weekly to the CAO or appropriate Department Heads. 14. Reduce expenditures by BOS for travel, furniture, office remodeling, meetings, etc. 15. Discontinue lunch for Board of Supervisors meetings. MANAGEMENT CONTROL 16. Make managers accountable for the performance of their staff. Don’t allow them to ignore poor performance. 17. Allow Department Heads to run their departments without drastic over broad policy actions. Example: Allow Department Heads to determine their own food budget within prescribed limits and budgets. It is contradictory to continue providing lunch to the BOS and discontinue this across the board in all Departments. It sends the wrong message. MANAGEMENT PAY/BENEFITS 18. Reduce the amount of management hours (to offset managers working overtime.) Many exempts NEVER work overtime. 19. Suspend the management professional development fee. 20. Eliminate car allowance to those who have it. 21. The 7% pay cut that they are trying to impose on county employees, I propose to take it out of the Board of Supervisors and the County Administrator since they make enough money to do their job. A lot of positions can be saved with the 7%, if not, then they can cut up to 20% or 30% of the salary increase they received last year. IMPLEMENTATION OF FURLOUGS ATTACHMENT D 22. My dad used to work for U.C. Berkeley and he was telling me that when times got really tough they decided to layoff employees every Friday. U.C. Berkeley made a request through Unemployment that their workers be compensated for the 1 day a week layoff. This way, the employees received almost their entire paycheck but of course not the entire amount. He says that this has to be done as a whole by the company and that it cannot be each individual employee requesting unemployment. He did say it would require more paperwork to be done by the County though ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE 23. Remove signal and street light maintenance crews from GSD to PW. Remove park and landscape maintenance crews from GSD to PW with appropriate funding considerations. This could potentially streamline the efficiency for these operations.) The above idea could also be modified to move all park and landscape services to GSD and PW has no responsibility to landscape and park maintenance services. 24. Eliminate the County Affirmative Action and SBE Programs. These are hanging-on programs that have already served their purpose both in the areas of employment and procurement. 25. Suspend the Outreach and SBE Programs. Currently large amounts of money are spent trying to implement this program with only marginal results. May observation is that only the larger more sophisticated contractors really understand the program and are able to successfully meet the outreach. So that leaves many smaller contractors left out and not awarded county contracts, or contractors with more overhead get the county jobs. In addition, the PWD has re-advertised many times to try to meet the requirements of outreach. This probably cost the County at least $5K each time, and we have awarded to the second or third bidder. Last year on the slurry seal we spent more than an additional $100K to get the second bidder. 26. Merge IT into General Services. 27. Consolidate between departments shared divisions such as GIS, HR, Contract Administration. 28. Eliminating the Employee Wellness Program. 29. Suspend the employee service award program. The county pays a vendor an average of $120,000 each fiscal year for recognition and award items. Recognition and awards are important, however, there may be other ways to accomplish. No more anniversary gifts please! I just received one for ten years of service and though the cost of these gifts may not be high, I believe they are totally unnecessary and if nothing else quite a bit of staff hours are necessary to coordinate/make purchases for this program. 30. Either completely consolidate or completely separate Personnel/Human Resourced, IS/IT functions, purchasing. Not cost effective to have to go through so many different departments to accomplish a task, nor is there sufficient standardization to streamline the process. HEALTH BENEFITS 31. Directly addressing OPEB at the benefits/retirement provision not through salary/premium freezes. Encourage Staff to choose cafeteria style benefits instead of costs shared across a single, and family plan. John Muir Family plan costs about $72 month and Sutter and Kaiser is free, we are ATTACHMENT D disadvantaged in hiring and retention when we freeze premium contributions that are already well in excess to those available in local Hospitals. 32. Consider expanding the County’s existing Occupational Medicine Program by joining a Medical Provider Network (MPN) similar to an HMO for the treatment of work related injuries or illnesses. CORE SERVICES 33. Eliminate non-essential tasks and programs (is Accreditation really worth the expense every 4 years?) 34. While many activities and services being funded by the County can be considered essential, “safety net” services, there are others that may be worthy and helpful, but not essential. Disbursement of County funds (either directly [e.g., via such funds as the Keller Mitigation Fund] or via contracts with CBOs) should be limited to critical services. PROPERTY/FACILITIES 35. Fast cash: Sell Buchanan Airport, perhaps to the City of Concord. Long term investment in revenue potential: expand and develop the Airport into a sales tax generating village of stores, etc. 36. Cancel office moves/relocations unless incurred costs will be recouped within 12 months resulting in an annual cost savings. 37. Hold on new leases for office space. 38. Eliminate/reduce earthquake insurance on county buildings 39. Freeze on moving furniture and staff unless cost reducing 40. Identify and sell surplus County property. 41. Hold on building/remodeling projects not currently under construction WORKERS COMPENSATION 42. Purchase liability and worker's comp insurance rather than self-insure. This would probably be more costly in the long term but would free up all our reserves in the short term. 43. Modify the purchasing contract procedures to suspend or eliminate the use of vendors such as Royal Office Supplies and others for office supplies and allow purchases based on market competition. Prior to these companies securing the contracts we had similar contract with CADDO. In both instances staff often found their prices were greater than what could be purchased on the open market or by using Office Depot, Office Max and other major office supply companies. While I understand the BOS and purchasing desire to use small businesses and minority owned businesses this should not be done to detriment of the County. There are small county departments (Revenue Collections) who do not have the freedom to find the best available price for the supplies we need has a negative impact on our ancillary budget. Therefore, recommending eliminating our exclusive use supply contract. ATTACHMENT D C. SUGGESTIONS THAT REQUIRE LABOR DISCUSSION AND AGREEMENT OR LEGISLATIVE ACTION 1. Cut in-home support services to serve only those patients who truly can't clean, cook, or shop for themselves. The abuses I see of this service are astounding. 2. Eliminate or discount funding life insurance programs for County and union employees (most people already have their own anyway). 3. Suspend or eliminate student worker program; have current staff take on additional work. Even though they are cheap. If permanent workers suffer take-aways through negotiations, it should be a no-brainer that there be no student hires. 4. Hire more non-engineers, instead of engineers. Many other agencies use non-engineers to perform what our engineers do here. When a deputy position opens up create a non-engineer deputy position to manage Real Property, Admin, Finance and IT. It does not make sense to be paying an engineer’s salary to do what a non-engineer can do. There are other upper management positions that can also be managed by non-engineers, which the department should look into. 5. Explore possibility of using volunteers to assist with as many functions as possible. 6. Suspend COLA increases to contract employees. 7. Work with the unions on developing set performance standards for each classification and then enforce the standards. Have all supervisors and managers trained in documentation and performance coaching/counseling. 8. Reduce On-call and Call-back hours (some employees receive this perk and never work) 9. Consider selling some County Buildings with renewable leaseback and option for sellback. Custodial and maintenance function transferred to the lessor. 10. Farm out employees with seasonal work responsibilities to other divisions/departments – use staff more equitably. Example: Construction Inspectors may have more down time in winter when they could be used for conducting other types of inspections or overseeing contractors on other jobs such as trash clean up in flood control channels. 11. Require productivity standards for similar job classifications (when able) so that all programs are required to do the same level/amount of work to increase work product and therefore amount of services provided. 12. Change the firefighters work schedule to be the same as the Sheriff Deputies who work three shifts to protect residents every day of every hour and who do not have the draining outrageous overtime costs. The firefighters know just how to work it to their advantage to earn exorbitant amounts of overtime. I see it all the time and it is not fair to the County that they work the system. ATTACHMENT D 13. Negotiate with labor unions to include a no strike clause, a no lay-off clause, and some unspecified language promoting ongoing worker cost saving suggestion, with a sharing of the monetary savings between workers and management. 14. Extend initial probationary period to 1 year for new hires. 15. Charge employees a monthly fee for parking in County controlled lots. 16. CCHP should research pharmacies as WalMart, Longs, CVS, etc., about offering plans for insurance like WalMart offers the general public in their $3.00 a month prescription. NON-SALARY ITEMS 17. Freeze county share of Deferred Comp contributions. 18. Re-negotiate union contracts where possible to suspend non-salary extras, similar to a professional development fee. 19. Move to a monthly pay system (eliminate the “cash advance” option). FURLOUGHS: 20. Shut down the county between Christmas and New Years. Very little work is done during this time. Keep only those offices open that are essential for the county to function. People should be allowed to use accruals if they have them; otherwise, the time off would be without pay. I would rather take a week of without pay than have salaries cut by 7%, thus negating all raises we have received over the past 5 years. It would take much longer than 5 years to regain any monies lost due to reducing salaries. 21. Suspend all alternative work schedules, particularly the 9-80. The 9-80 work schedule is a significant employee benefit and the county receives significantly less productivity under this plan. 22. Change work hours from 8 hour days to 9 hour days four days a week. 23. Change employees time to 10 hours a day four days a week. 24. Shorten working hours for all employees (which includes hourly, administrative, and management employees, but not including 24-hour operations) to 35 or 37.5 hours. 25. Close departments at 12 noon four days out of a month. 26. Shorten the week to a four-day workweek and close non-24 hour facilities on the fifth day. 27. Mandatory day off each month (same day for entire county) or voluntary furlough (as done several budget crisis ago). If practical, certain offices might be closed as well. Then have employee, or employees eligible for retirement, agree to have their pay for that day deducted from their paycheck and contributed to the General Fund, Hospital Fund, etc., in that way, their retirement base salary is not impacted. I understand that Sonoma County is doing this very thing. ATTACHMENT D 28. If furlough or salary reduction is needed figure out way to keep final salary intact so those about to retire will not be harmed. One idea is to increase amount taken out for retirement as cost savings and not touch income levels. 29. Get rid of the VTO program that allows for full benefits and accruals for people working part time. 30. Employees forfeit 2 paid days once a month and possibly use their vacation/PTO to cover the paid days or we just forfeit those days with out pay. 31. One day a month off without pay. Please consider closing the county for a day or two a month rather than cutting positions. This is a considerable cost savings. It also leaves in tact the structure that is providing services now so that when/as things improve the structure is there to increase services again. I believe that employees are willing to make this kind of a sacrifice rather than lose jobs. 32. One non-paid furlough the day before or after one of the county holidays. The manager/employee would choose the day of non-paid furlough. LEAVE 33. Change Volunteer Leave and Sick Leave to Paid Time Off to decrease lost productivity because of overuse of Sick Leave. 34. Every county worker volunteer to give one days work to a special county fund, either vacation, sick time or holiday. If everyone contribute this time and money could be useful. Maybe some could give 4 hours and others eight. 35. Cap sick balance to the same cap as vacation balance. When cap has been reached accruals over the cap will be awarded to the catastrophic leave bank. This will save money on how much retirees will be allowed to use to compute and draw on their retirement. 36. Cash benefit for employees using 0 sick leave. OVERTIME/COMP TIME 37. Eliminate over-time and comp-time for all employees (including health and safety employees), and no compensation in dollars or as applied to a benefit; for example, as comp-time accruals for retirement benefits. 38. Create a maximum number of overtime hours represented employees can accrue per month/year SALARIES AND WAGES 39. Increasing salaries significantly like +20% in exchange for offering a cut in retirement benefits. Encourage Staff to opt for a lower retirement payment bya much larger take home salary. Encouraging more independent saving for retirement with a tiered matched 401K for everyone. 40. County should offer all employees from all unions the same COLA. ATTACHMENT D 41. Freeze ALL performance bonuses. 42. Eliminate Bi-lingual pay 43. Revisit some contract provisions, such as hazard pay and excessive shift differentials 44. Temporarily suspend all raises that have been granted/approved for the last 18 months and return salary to former level, excludes COLA increases. 45. Change monthly payroll deposits by at least one day. Employees with Credit Union accounts receive their funds a day early. Do not process the direct deposits or hand out paper checks until 3:00 p.m. on pay day in order to generate an extra day or two of interest in the County treasury. HEALTH BENEFITS 46. Prorate all benefits and accruals for part-time employees. Currently pay 100% of health for employees working half time or more – should be prorated. 47. Have part-time employees pay a greater share of their health benefits to decrease the increased cost of part-time employees to make them equal to the cost of a full-time employee. 48. Change the structure of health benefits and have employees pay according to the number of members in their family that are covered. An employee covering a family consisting of 5 (husband/wife/3 children) would pay more than a family of 2 (single mom/one child). 49. Increase employee contribution to all health plans, including CCHP. 50. Start charging CCHP members for frivolous visits to ER's outside of the system. 51. Require a co-pay for employees' CCHP prescriptions. 52. Have only two health plan choices rather than three. 53. Health insurance option to fund Healthcare Spending Account. 54. Offer new hires county health insurance only. 55. Allow employees who are covered for health insurance under a spouse’s plan to choose to have a stipend paid to them instead of benefits. 56. Sliding scale for health care premiums for part time employees WORK SCHEDULES 57. Re-evaluate the effectiveness of a 9/80 schedule. Possible options may be to have non-essential offices closed alternate Fridays with staff coming in a half day for training, meetings, etc. Would also improve staff availability and help with coverage needs ATTACHMENT D 58. Absenteeism: Reduce stress in the office, allow flexibility (9/80s), and don’t come to work when very sick. Apparently some people think the office will actually not function unless they are there. And, they wish to share everything, including their germs – and they do so generously, making others sick. 59. On July 8, 2008 the Contra Costa Times rand an article titled "Utah going to a 4-day workweek to save energy". It you look at that article in the archives, you will see how going to a 4 day work week would save the county thousands on some of the following: electricity, gas for company cars, days off for people who would be able to make appointments on those off days instead of taking time out of a normal workday, not to mention the savings for us commuters who don't have good access to public transit and the gas goes back up to $5.00 a gallon. There would be other savings also that I will not list here. I know that some services such as the hospitals, etc could not do that, but for the offices and workers who can, it would be wonderful. I know that if CA. and CC County is so far behind the other states in energy saving ideas that this would not be implemented here, even putting the workers on 9/80 would offer SOME savings, but obviously not as much as a full 4/10 would. GOVERNANCE 60. Privatize the County hospital. 61. Board of Directors for Health services with a budget and authority to allocate funds according to best practice guidelines and Licensing requirements-could be answerable to BOS but not have them make decisions on Healthcare allocation which they are less equipped than Health Srvice Administration to do. 62. Create all independent fire districts. CONTRACTING OUT 63. Outsource or contract all non-core county functions. In some cases this might require higher base pay but the county would realize savings with eliminating employee benefits. 64. Outsource Revenue Collection 65. Change state law to allow us to contract out Janitorial and Landscape services. 66. Have an outside contract perform minor services (oil, lube, filter and maybe even tire rotations and smog/smoke checks) in our maintenance yards on Fridays, evenings, or weekends. This will reduce down time for vehicles, and the cost to transport and service equipment 67. Privatize fleet services. 68. Suggest General Services to bid against outside contractors for landscape maintenance in hopes of reducing costs. Not unlike how Public Work Surveys bid by Bypass work. 69. Privatize services when that would result in savings and when legally feasible (e.g., new functions and low-risk functions. At the same time, before a contract is approved an evaluation should be made as to whether the contract work can be done by existing staff or if it is truly specialized work ATTACHMENT D requiring expert outside assistance. This requires evaluation by the department (and perhaps a written explanation) and oversight by the County Administrator’s Office. 70. Investigate use of contractors, looking for long term use in lieu of staff. 71. Evaluate what services can be contracted out, for example testing of applicants, billing, accounts receivable. WORKERS COMPENSATION 72. Be more aggressive with worker's compensation claims, including setting and sticking with time lines for claimants to become permanent and stationary. 73. Modify or eliminate the County’s Workers’ Compensation salary continuation plan. 74. Modify or eliminate the County’s continuing pay of wages (up to 3 hours per day for the duration of the claim) if the employee must attend medical appointments for a work related injury or illness during the work day. RETIREMENT 75. Reduce subsidy of employee contributions to CCC Employees Retirement Association. 76. One policy I see is most wasteful and is not a policy in the private sector is the way retirement benefits are calculated. It is my understanding that a county worker can be paid for all unused sick time and vacation time in the last paycheck and it results in their annual income increasing significantly and then the amount of money they receive during their retirement is increased by that amount, because their retirement is based on income of the last working year. This extra padding on the salary results in lucrative retirement packages for those individuals who work a great deal of overtime or do not take vacation. Many companies are requiring their employees to use vacation on an annual basis. This time is used to refresh and regenerate the employee. It seems to me that having a retirement program benefits employees who have served for many years, often at salaries un-commeasuring the private sector. I'd like to see the retirement continue, but at a more equitable rate directly proportional to the salary an individual earns, without the padding. 77. Implement a stronger incentive at retirement. If it’s worth more at retirement, it would save a lot of money today. 78. CCC retirees should have to use CCHP and assign their Medicare to them in order to better contain coast. This is still a generous offer, and if one chooses to use other services, they would need to pay out of pocket. 79. Retirees that are on the penny plan could pay at least $5.00 a month for their benefits HOLIDAYS 80. Give up one floating holiday a year, if unable to do due to union rules, then ask for volunteers. ATTACHMENT D 81. Do away with the following holidays: Lincoln's Birthday, Admissions Day and Columbus Day. This would cut overtime costs 3 times a year. (for nurses etc) D. SUGGESTIONS THAT ARE NOT FEASIBLE TO IMPLEMENT 1. I was inspired that yesterday President Obama capped all of his senior staff salaries at $100,000. While I do not, nor any of my colleagues make $100,000 salaries, it occurs to me that someone in a position to do so might re-evaluate some of the costly Administrative and/or Medical positions which do command exceedingly high salaries (and cap their salaries). Might this be a consideration for cost savings? Why should the civil servant be the only one asked to sacrifice in these difficult times? I believe that everyone should be held accountable to our budget crisis, and everyone should be asked to contribute to the solution. 2. Allow employees to adjust the thermostats in their areas in the buildings. It is a lot cheaper to let an employee turn up the thermostat in a room to keep that room warmer than it is to pay for the electricity for the employee to run a small heater under their desk and pay the additional PG&E to air-condition the room at the same time. It just seems silly to pay to heat and cool the room at the same time. I know that people aren't supposed to have the heaters here, but people will bring them in as long as the offices are ridiculously uncomfortable to work in. 3. With a draught coming we are longtime overdue for signs in bathrooms like the 60's(?), if it's yellow, mellow, if it's brown flush it down. Hopefully saves water bill and water! 4. Put all electronics on timers and power strips. Lights can be put on timers as well. 5. Hire no one. Redeploy existing staff as necessary to accommodate retirements and other departures. 6. Impose a temporary moratorium on new hires and on replacing employees who have left County employment. 7. Create a spending over-site committee to ensure the tax money we spend is utilized properly. It seems to me a lot of money is wasted on unnecessary purchases and many employees conduct themselves as if county money is a never ending well. A committee poking their nose into everything may prevent this. As long as you allow them access to everything. 8. Add GPS to county issued cell phones to track employee whereabouts. 9. Before a contract for outside legal services to a department is approved, the County Administrator’s Office should consult with County Counsel to determine whether the work can be done by County Counsel or whether it needs to be done by the outside attorney. Ordinarily, the same work can be done more inexpensively by County Counsel. Legal contracts should be prepared and administered by County Counsel. The monthly billings should be sent to County Counsel for review and approval, and then forwarded to the department to be paid. When departments are allowed to hire their “own” attorneys, they tend to call them for all kinds of miscellaneous advice that they should be referring to County Counsel. Monitoring of the billing enables us to determine whether this is happening. When this does occur, County Counsel would advise the Deputy County Administrator assigned to the department. The County Administrator’s Office could then take action to stop the practice. ATTACHMENT D 10. Do not bring retirees back on contract. This is “double dipping” so to speak. Not only do they get their retirement check with benefits but they also get top step on their past classification with 5% additional pay in lieu of benefits. This is insane. There is ZERO excuse in not filing positions with a person within the unit or on the promotional list. This is just another case of wasted tax payer money and as a tax payer of this County and a County employee this practice needs to stop. 11. I am not an accountant, so I can't speak to the cost savings, but a lot of companies that are having budget problems seem to send off senior people with golden parachutes. I wouldn't be surprised if there were some managers here that would be willing to leave with the right parachute package. Encourage early retirement on a voluntary basis. There must be some precedence for this, with some incentives. With any retirements, idea above will take effect. 12. Offer some golden handshakes for employees with 30+ years. (Service time and/or age). 13. Golden handshakes for early Retirement. (For people with five years or less to retire.) 14. Merge Treasurer and Auditor. 15. Merge Clerk-Recorder and Assessor. 16. Decentralize the Department of Information and Technology (DoIT). Allow the individual departments in the County to manage their Information Technology either through existing department staff or by contract as each department determines. Consolidate all IT services and budget these services from one central organization. 17. A voluntary work reduction program, in which employees can opt for one day off without pay during a pay period but maintain full time benefits and accruals. Santa Clara County offers this type of program. 18. Encourage voluntary time off without pay up to some percentage of time, while keeping benefits. Maybe require supervisor or department head approval. 19. Request 'volunteers' to 'donate' some of their sick leave/vacation to the fund. I, for one, would be willing to do this. 20. Ask all employees making over $20.00 per hour ($40,000. per year) to take a temporary 5% pay cut. 21. Pay cut: 10% for those who gross over $80,000; 5% for those who gross $40,000 to $79,000; 3% for those who gross less than $40,000. Everyone takes the pay cut from BOS to lowest paid worker. No exceptions. This will end in 4 years when everyone will have pay restored to the level they are at today. No retroactive pay, etc., etc., 22. Eliminate long term workers compensation employees. Get then off the books. ATTACHMENT E Page 1 of 3 EMPLOYMENT AND HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2008-2009 COST SAVINGS SUGGESTIONS Summary The Employment and Human Services Department has solicited and reviewed almost 400 “cost savings suggestions” from its employees. To date, 31 of these have been implemented in full or part. Another 39 are under serious consideration. Over $621,000 in savings has been realized in the current fiscal year and were factored into the reductions the Department has taken to date. An additional $132,000 is projected to be realized from adoption, most of this also in the current fiscal year. Background In October of 2008, EHSD agreed to a recommendation from its five labor organizations to form a joint “Labor-Management Cost Savings Task Force” as part of a strategy to prepare for pending budget cuts. The goal of the task force was to solicit suggestions from staff that would either reduce costs or increase the efficiency of work processes. A “Zoomerang” survey was sent out to all 1,700 of the department’s employees soliciting their suggestions. Almost 400 specific suggestions were received. The Task Force reviewed them and identified which ones merited further examination. Department managers reviewed the feasibility as well as cost savings or workload savings potential of those the Task Force identified. Several had already been implemented, and others were implemented as part of the December budget reductions which the Department took. To date, 31 of the suggestions have been implemented in full or part. Another 39 are under serious consideration. Over $621,000 in savings have been realized in the current fiscal year and were factored into the reductions the Department has already taken. An additional $132,000 in savings are projected to be realized from adoption of the others, most of this also in the current fiscal year. Although some of the suggestions would only yield one-time savings, continuation of the practices suggested by some of the others will yield additional cost savings in the 09-10 Fiscal Year and beyond. The Task Force continues to meet to review the status of implementation of adopted suggestions and suggestions still under study. Task Force members also continue to propose additional cost savings ideas to explore. The suggestions that have been accepted for adoption for which specific cost savings have been identified are summarized below. Following this list is a sample of some of the other suggestions which have been adopted for which there is as yet no cost savings estimate or are still under study. In addition, Department managers have also implemented a number of additional projects to reduce costs, maximize state and federal revenue, or improve the efficiency of work processes. Some of these are listed at the end. ATTACHMENT E Page 2 of 3 Adopted Costs Savings Suggestions Savings Identified Suggestion Savings Already Taken Additional Savings to be Taken Reduce janitorial services by 10% including reduction in grounds maintenance. $117,090 Discontinue client newsletter: “Opportunity Knocking” $60,000 Eliminate the “General Assistance Hearing Officer” – transfer this responsibility to the G.A. Supervisors $90,058 Eliminate county general funds from the contract for the “Welcome Home Baby” program [still receives First Five and Medi-Cal funds]. $316,908 Eliminate the “CalWIN” Help Desk Unit $37,000 Prohibit overnight travel to out of county conferences unless cost is totally covered by non-county funds and there is a funder requirement or critical business reason. $24,000 Use recycled ink cartridges for printers. $30,000 Reduce IT Capital Projects and associated overtime $49,000 Solicit voluntary furloughs – 771 voluntary furlough hours were actually taken in December and January $23,000 Change the default margins on Word Documents from 1.25” to 1” [illustrated on this document]. $5,000 Eliminate staff recognition events-“Breakfast at Joe’s” $1,500 TOTAL $621,056 $132,500 Adopted Costs Savings Suggestions Savings Not Yet Identified Review cell phone and Blackberry usage. Assign cell phones and Blackberries only to those staff for which there is a demonstrated business need. Implement an automated recording for clients calling the offices that would let clients know when the office is closed and provide them with information on the correct number to call for various services. Maximize the use of the Department’s “Polycom” remote broadcasting Equipment” for both training and meetings. Continue to accept requests for voluntary furloughs. Replace fleet vehicles with hybrid vehicles [will occur as vehicles come up for replacement]. Check the irrigation system at 1650 Cavallo Road in Antioch. ATTACHMENT E Page 3 of 3 Examples of Cost Savings Suggestions Under Consideration • Make the default printer setting for all documents two-sided. Although this can’t be done with many of the prescribed state forms we use, all staff have been encouraged to use 2-sided printing whenever possible. • Recycle unused forms in the intake packets for public assistance applications. • Create a web portal so clients can access forms on-line. • Create a work room for Social Workers at Juvenile Court so that they can work on other tasks while waiting for their case to come up. We’re currently exploring assigning them lap tops so they can do other work while waiting. • Stop buying individual desk printers. Require all users to print to network printers. • Be more aggressive in pricing out contracts. Compare fees paid by non-government agencies. • Establish one phone number for client complaints. Management Initiated Business Improvement Projects • Provide intensive training to all supervisors and staff on using the appropriate codes to record those activities that qualify for maximum state and federal funding [completed]. • Upgrade the department’s phone system so that clients can access information about their benefits through an Interactive Voice Response system. • Review the reception processes in EHSD offices to identify changes in procedures that will better handle the increasingly larger numbers of persons coming in to apply for assistance. Preliminary research has already been conducted looking at some of the systems which the Department of Motor Vehicles has put in place • Maximize the use of the increased Medi-Cal allocation to add positions which can be fully funded from this allocation. • Improve the review of Foster Care Eligibility determinations to ensure all foster children eligible for federal reimbursement are identified. • Integrate “General Assistance” staff with CalWorks staff to provide more flexibility in backing up application processing tasks. • Explore the feasibility of sending CalWIN print jobs directly to the department’s electronic document management system – CaseStars – so that documents don’t have to be first printed out then manually scanned into CaseStars. ATTACHMENT F HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEE COST SAVINGS SUGGESTIONS Employees from the Health Services Department have submitted 1,135 ideas as of February 11, 2009 and more come in every day. Every suggestion is being evaluated for possible cost savings. A number of these suggestions have already been implemented, and many more are under review for possible implementation. The campaign ends February 14. Here is what is happening to some of those suggestions. Immediate Implementation Because there is great urgency to the County’s financial situation, the Health Services Director is acting to take immediate action on the following: - Beginning with the March issue of the Director’s Report, virtually all printed copies of the publication will be discontinued. It will still be available online at cchealth.org and some small quantities will be available for those who don’t have access to a computer. That should save close to $10,000 annually. - All Division Directors and Program managers have been asked to look closely at the systems they have in place for ordering supplies, equipment, furniture and other items. They have been reminded to use the most cost effective purchasing strategies, keeping acquisitions to a minimum and ensuring that there are controls over how supplies are being used. - Consistent with a directive issued by the County Administrator (CAO) in December, there will be no county funds spent for food or beverages, including water, at county meetings. Purchase orders will be rejected for those items if they are bought with County funds and there is no prior approval from the CAO’s office. - All out-of-county travel and expenses related to conferences must be approved by the Health Services Director and will not be authorized unless there is special grant or other funding available to cover the costs. Teleconferencing will be used wherever possible to attend meetings out of county. - A review of areas such as cell phones, Blackberries, pagers and county vehicles has been ordered to ensure that they are properly assigned and that the county costs are appropriate. - The Health Services Personnel Director will be issuing a bulletin to supervisors and managers highlighting their responsibilities for cost containment. - HSD has posted many ideas on their intranet site, including a list of things employees themselves can do to reduce expenses, including printing double sided, turning out lights etc. ATTACHMENT F Streamlining Operations Many HSD employees submitted ideas about how to streamline operations as well as to reduce costs. Some of the ideas included consolidating positions, utilizing staff more effectively, acquiring software at no cost, saving energy and more. Division Directors and program managers are reviewing all those ideas. Some other ideas will no doubt be implemented soon because many of the Division Directors have commented, “this is a good idea,” “we will look into this immediately.” Others will take longer to analyze – sometimes the cost of improving a process will be beyond what can be paid for now. RECOMMENDATION(S): CONSIDER whether to join litigation filed by Sacramento County against the State Controller and other State officials, challenging their deferral of various required social services payments to counties. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: On February 13, 2009, the State Controller took action to defer payment to counties relating to specified social services programs, to “preserve cash” for legal claims against the State of California. Such payments are mandated by State law and have been appropriated by the Legislature. The Controller has stated that these payments will be paid in March, after 30 days, but future deferrals will be considered on a month-to-month basis. The impact on Contra Costa County so far totals $9,602,858, including deferral of the following payments: $153,600: Adoptions Administration APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Silvano Marchesi, (925) 335-1800 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jane Pennington, Deputy cc: D.3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Silvano B. Marchesi, County Counsel Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Initiation of Litigation BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) $27,338: Adoptions Assistance $253,906: Adult Protective Services $150,912: CalWIN Project $722,242: CalWorks Administration $4,623,962: CalWORKS Assistance $45,713: Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants $1,074,119: Child Welfare Services IV-E $279,340: Child Welfare Services IV-B $210,858: Other Child Welfare Service funding $681,960: Food Stamps $34,902: Foster Care Administration $611,888: Foster Care Assistance $18,200: Independent Living Program $700,139: In-Home Supportive Services $30,200: Licensing This County does not have sufficient resources to cover the State’s share of benefit payments to welfare recipients. This County has insufficient resources to cover, for a length of time, the deferral of its costs to administer these and other programs. Nevertheless, counties are charged, under state law, with carrying out the programs that are subject to these deferrals. At least as to some of the programs subject to deferred payments, the County will be faced with a statutory duty to carry out the programs and insufficient funds to do so. Sacramento County has filed suit in Sacramento County Superior Court to challenge this deferral. The county has asked other counties to join its litigation, and about 28 counties have done so to date. The litigation seeks the following remedies: a. Writ of mandate requiring the Controller to release any previously appropriated state and/or federal funds that he has previously withheld for either assistance or administrative costs. b. Writ of mandate requiring the Controller, the State Treasurer, and others to issue warrants to the County for which funds have been appropriated for the identified programs (as identified in the Budget Act) that are not currently exhausted or otherwise legally encumbered and/or to determine whether any current appropriation is available for specified purposes and, if so, to approve payment from such appropriation. c. A judicial declaration that the Controller is statutorily obligated to promptly and fully allocate appropriations to counties. d. A judicial declaration that the County satisfies its legal duty by providing assistance/services with any federal funds allocated for such assistance/services and with the County share of cost as statutorily determined, and that the County has no legal duty to backfill any state or federal funds that are deferred by the Controller. e. A temporary restraining order and injunction, enjoining the State Controller from withholding state and/or federal funds until appropriate Notices of Action have been issued by the State, advising recipients of reductions in benefits or assistance. RECOMMENDATION(S): CLOSED SESSION FISCAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.4 To:Board of Supervisors From:COB Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Board Report CLERK'S ADDENDUM Supervisor Bonilla reported hosting a community forum on the budget crisis at the Diablo Valley Democratic Club, which Dr. Walker, Director of Health Services and Joe Valentine, Director of Employment and Human Services also attended; Supervisor Uilkema reported attending a community meeting on co-sponsored Aging and Adult Services on fall prevention; Supervisor Piepho reported attending a Friday Night Live event in San Ramon Valley emphasizing the neighborhood and social impacts of juvenile alcohol consumption. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/57 approving and authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to partially close a portion of Parker Avenue, on March 14, 2009 from 9:00 am through 10:00 am, for the purpose of Opening Day Parade, Rodeo area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Applicant shall follow guidelines set forth by the Public Works Department. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Applicant will be unable to close the road for planned activities. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Bob Hendry 335-1575 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: Julie Carlson, Engineering Services, Bob Hendry C.1 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve and Authorize the Public Works Director, or designee, to partially close a portion of Parker Avenue, Rodeo area. (District II) ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2009/57 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/24/2009 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2009/57 Approving and Authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to parially close a portion of Parker Avenue, on March 14, 2009 from 9:00 am through 10:00 am, for the purpose of Opening Day Parade, Rodeo area. (District II) RC-09-1 IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that permission is granted to Rodeo Baseball Association to partially close Parker Avenue, except for emergency traffic, on March 14, 2009 for the period of 9:00 am through 10:00 am, subject to the following conditions: 1. Traffic will be detoured via neighboring streets. 2. All signing to be in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 3. Rodeo Baseball Association shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County. 4. Provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 for Comprehensive General Public Liability which names the County as an additional insured prior to permit issuance. 5. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriff’s Department, the California Highway Patrol and the Fire District. Contact: Bob Hendry 335-1575 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Julie Carlson, Engineering Services, Bob Hendry RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a Roadway Encroachment Permit issued by the County of Alameda Public Works Agency as required for the construction of the Vasco Road Overlay Project, and arrange for payment of the $225 permit fee and reimbursement costs for inspection and related expenses incurred by the County of Alameda Public Works Agency in relation to this project in accordance with said permit. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no impact to County General Fund. The estimated project construction cost is $2,700,000 and is completely funded by Federal funds authorized through the Economic Stimulus Bill. The $225 permit fee will be funded by local road funds. BACKGROUND: Public Works Department is gearing up for the Vasco Overlay project in anticipation of the Federal Economic Stimulus Bill. The purpose of this project is to improve the pavement condition of Vasco Road by providing an asphalt concrete overlay from the Alameda County Line north for a distance of 3.1 miles. The estimated construction cost of this project is $2,700,000 and APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Larry Theis 313-2166 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: M.Epps, L. Theis, S. Frances C.2 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Encroachment Permit by County of Alameda Public Works Agency for Vasco Road Overlay Project, Brentwood Area. Project No. 0662-6R4069-09 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) will be funded by federal funds authorized through the upcoming Economic Stimulus Bill. Temporary construction area signs and portable changeable message boards will need to be placed in the Alameda County right of way. Thus the property owner, Alameda County, requires that the County enter into a Roadway Encroachment Permit to place the necessary construction area warning signs for this project. Furthermore, as a requirement to receive the Federal Funds, the County must obtain this permit in its name and not delegate this solely to its project contractor. To meet the expected tight deadlines to construct the Vasco Road Overlay project this summer, it is necessary to obtain this permit now, prior to the approval of the federal Economic Stimulus Bill. This roadway encroachment permit is an essential part of the county's project submittal package to Caltrans for their review and approval. The encroachment permit provided by Alameda County requires the County to defend and indemnify Alameda County “from and against all claims, losses, damages, liabilities, or expenses, including reasonable attorney fees incurred in the defense thereof, for the death of or injury to any person or persons (including the permittee’s or the County’s employees) or damage to any property and/or business loss or economic harm that arises out of or is in any way connected with the issuance of this permit or with work performed by permittee or permittee’s contractors, consultants, or agents under this permit (collectively “Liabilities”).” The effect of this provision is to cause the County to assume liability for any business loss or economic harm that arises out of the County’s use of Alameda’s County right of way. While it would be preferable to revise the provision to eliminate the County’s liability for business loss and economic harm, it is staff’s opinion that the possibility of triggering business loss or economic harm to Alameda County by installing construction signs and portable changeable message boards within their right of way is very remote. For this reason, and because of the limited time available to obtain the permit before the Federal Funding deadline, we are recommending the permit be approved in its present form. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without this permit, the $2.7 million in federal funding will be in jeopardy. ATTACHMENTS G:\Design\BOARD ORDERS\2009\Roadway Encroachment Permit.pdf RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/59 accepting completion of improvements and declaring the widening of Oakgate Drive as a County road, for Subdivision MS 04-00020 for project being developed by Oak Gate Properties, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville (Blackhawk) area. (District III) FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The developer has completed the private and public improvements per the Subdivision Agreement and in accordance with the Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The completion of the private and public improvements will not be accepted, the warranty period will not begin, and the performance/maintenance bond will not be reduced. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque 313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: J. Carlson, Engineering Services, K. Guruwaya, Construction, H. Finch, Maintenance, I. Bergeron, Mapping, L. Hunt. Records, P. Edwards, Engineering Services, Matt Beinke, Oak Gate Properties, LLC, Jeanne Winter, Developers Surety and Indemnity Company C.3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Accept completion of improvements and declare widening of Oakgate Drive as a County Road, for Subdivision MS 04-00020, Danville (Blackhawk) area. ATTACHMENTS Recorded Resolution Resolution No. 2009/59 BO\2009\2-24\MS 04-00020\MS 04-00020 Bond Rider.pdf G:\EngSvc\BO\2009\2-24\MS 04-00020\MS 04-00020 Maintenance Bond.pdf THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/24/2009 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2009/59 Accepting completion of improvements and declaring the widening of Oakgate Drive as a County road, for Subdivision MS 04-00020, for project being developed by Oak Gate Properties, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville (Blackhawk) area. (District III) The Public Works Director has notified this Board that the improvements in Subdivision MS 04-00020 have been completed as provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Oak Gate Properties, LLC, heretofore approved by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the Subdivision Map. The Public Works Department having also notified this Board that these improvements have been completed with the exception of minor deficiencies, for which a $4,500.00 cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 512114, dated October 22, 2008) was made by Oak Gate Properties, LLC to insure the application of Type II Slurry. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the improvements have been COMPLETED as of February 24, 2009 thereby establishing the six month terminal period for the filing of liens in case of action under said Subdivision Agreement: DATE OF AGREEMENT NAME OF BANK/SURETY June 27, 2006 Developers Surety and Indemnity Company BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the payment (labor and materials) surety and rider for $115,900.00, Bond No. 720014S issued by the above surety be RETAINED for the six month lien guarantee period until August 24, 2009, at which time the Clerk of the Board is AUTHORIZED to release the surety less the amount of any claims on file. Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque 313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: J. Carlson, Engineering Services, K. Guruwaya, Construction, H. Finch, Maintenance, I. Bergeron, Mapping, L. Hunt. Records, P. Edwards, Engineering Services, Matt Beinke, Oak Gate Properties, LLC, Jeanne Winter, Developers Surety and Indemnity Company BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the widening of Oakgate Drive the hereinafter described road, as shown and dedicated for public use on the Parcel Map of MS 04-00020 filed August 7, 2006, in Book 197 of Parcel Maps at Page 38, and the additional right-of-way as conveyed by separate instrument, recorded on April 20, 2006, Document Number DOC-2006-0123182-00, Official Records of Contra Costa County, State of California, is ACCEPTED and DECLARED to be a County road. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the private improvements have been COMPLETED and are NOT ACCEPTED NOR DECLARED as County Roads, at this time. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the beginning of the warranty period is hereby established, and the $2,318.00 cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 465254, dated June 8, 2006) made by Oak Gate Properties, LLC and the performance/maintenance surety for $34,770.00 Bond Rider No.720014S issued by Developer’s Surety and Indemnity Company be RETAINED pursuant to the requirements of Section 94 4.406 of the Ordinance Code until release by this Board. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/58 releasing Deficiency Deposit for Subdivision 92-07746, for project being developed by Leonard and Jeanne Steffen, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District III) FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The minor deficiencies have been corrected and the deficiency bond can be released. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The deficiency bond will not be released. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque 313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: Julie Carlson, Engineering Services, S. Francis, Finance, K. Guruwaya, Construction, P. Edwards, Engineering Services C.4 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Releasing Deficiency Deposit for SD 92-07746, Alamo area. (District III) ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2009/58 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/24/2009 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2009/58 Releasing Deficiency Deposit for Subdivision 92-07746, for project being developed by Leonard and Jeanne Steffen, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District III) The Board on June 21, 2005, having accepted as complete the improvements in Subdivision 92-07746, Alamo area, with the exception of minor deficiencies for which $3,000.00 (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 386578, dated May 16, 2002) was deposited as security for completion of said deficiencies; and The Public Works Director having reported that the aforesaid minor deficiencies have been corrected and having recommended that she be authorized to refund the $3,000.00, plus interest in accordance with Government Code Section 53079, if appropriate, to Leonard Steffen; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque 313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Julie Carlson, Engineering Services, S. Francis, Finance, K. Guruwaya, Construction, P. Edwards, Engineering Services RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE a reimbursement agreement for $214,296.48 between the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District) and 207 Coggins Drive Associates, LLC, effective February 24, 2009, through February 24, 2019, as stated in Exhibit “A” of the Agreement, and AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board to execute the agreement on behalf of the FC District. FISCAL IMPACT: The reimbursement will be made from Drainage Area 44B funds, which are collected pursuant to Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 2002-42. BACKGROUND: 207 Coggins Drive Associates, LLC constructed 147 rental apartment units within Drainage Area 44B. Said development is within the jurisdiction of the City of Pleasant Hill (City). City’s conditions of approval for said development requires 207 Coggins Drive Associates, LLC to install a portion of the drainage facilities shown on the adopted Drainage Plan for Drainage Area 44B. The cost to install APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Teri E. Rie, (925) 313-2363 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: C.6 To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve a Reimbursement Agreement with 207 Coggins Drive Associates, LLC for Drainage Area 44B Improvements. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) these facilities exceeds the amount of drainage fee required by the drainage fee ordinance for said drainage area, Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 2002-42. Since the FC District has an effective Drainage Plan and a Drainage Area Credit and Reimbursement Policy for said drainage area, 207 Coggins Drive Associates, LLC has requested that the FC District enter into this agreement, pursuant to said policy. 207 Coggins Drive Associates, LLC is entitled to reimbursement of the drainage facility construction costs in excess of its drainage fees, as provided for in the FC District’s Drainage Area Credit and Reimbursement Policy. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The FC District will not reimburse 207 Coggins Drive Associates, LLC, as required under the Drainage Area Credit and Reimbursement Policy. ATTACHMENTS Reimbursement Agreement with 207 Coggins Dr., Assocs., LLC Signed Agreement RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to execute an amendment to the consultant services agreement with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company, who have met the requirements of the County’s Disadvantage Business Enterprise Program, to increase contract payment limit by $46,544, to a new contract payment limit of $1,067,200, and to extend the term from December 31, 2008 to Decemeber 31, 2009, to continue to provide consulting services for the Buchanan Field Master Plan and Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 Noise Study, Buchanan Field Airport’s Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Project No. 3-06-0050-13 and 3-06-0050-14, Pacheco Area (District IV). FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact on the General Fund. The total contract cost for the Master Plan, including this amendment for $46,544, is $1,067,200, of which $84,400 is from the Airport Enterprise Fund, $46,800 from CALTRANS, and $936,000 from FAA Airport Improvement Program. The additional costs of $46,544 will come 100% from the Airport Enterprise Fund($12,344 in Fiscal Year 2008-2009 and $34,200 in Fiscal Year 2009-2010). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Beth Lee (925) 646-5722 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: Joellen Waters, Victoria Mejia, Beth Lee C.5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Keith Freitas, Airports Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve twelve month contract extension with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company for Buchanan Master Plan and FAR Part 150 Noise Study Project BACKGROUND: On October 9, 2001, and reaffirmed in a subsequent action on February 25, 2003, the Board of Supervisors authorized the submission of grant applications to the Federal Aviation Administration and CALTRANS to perform the Buchanan Field Airport Master Plan, Business Plan, and Federal Aviation Regulation Part 150 Noise Study. On August 12, 2003, the Board accepted the FAA and CALTRANS grants for the Buchanan Field Airport Master Plan and FAR Part 150 study. On April 1, 2003, the Airport Division (Airport) of the Contra Costa County Public Works Department issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for a consultant to perform the Buchanan Field Airport Master Plan, Business Plan, and FAR Part 150 Study. The RFP required interested consultants to provide responses by June 1, 2004. The Airport received only two RFP submittals for consideration. Barnard Dunkelberg & Company and Leigh Fisher Associates were the prime consultants for the two teams. Working with a ten-person RFP Subcommittee comprised of airport businesses, pilots, County staff, and local business/resident representatives, the RFP submittals were reviewed and ranked and then both consultant teams were interviewed. The Barnard Dunkelberg & Company team emerged as the preferred consultant for the Buchanan Field Airport Master Plan process. Airport staff reconvened the Buchanan Master Plan Steering Committee to discuss the RFP process and consultant preference. The Steering Committee has over fifty members who represent the community and business interests both on the airport and in the surrounding communities. The Steering Committee accepted the recommendation of the RFP Subcommittee. Airport staff worked with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company to refine their scope of work and associated project costs and forwarded the information to the FAA for their consideration on November 23, 2004. On December 14, 2004, the FAA confirmed the selection of Barnard Dunkelberg & Company to perform consulting services for the Buchanan Field Airport Master Plan and FAR Part 150 Noise Study. The total original project amount was $1,040,000 inclusive of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grant and local match funds, of which $1,020,656 was the contract amount for Barnard Dunkelberg & Company. The master plan, noise study and other associated components were expected to take around three (3) years to complete. To maximize public participation, the process included a three-tiered approach, a County staff working committee, a Master Plan Steering Committee and nine larger, general public meetings throughout the development process. County staff ensured that County policies, plans, and standards are incorporated in the process. The Steering Committee provided external policy direction for the process and included representatives from neighboring jurisdictions, businesses, pilots, economic development/environmental/community serving organizations, Municipal Advisory Committees, elected officials, and the like. The broader public meetings provided an on-going opportunity to make sure that plans and policy direction are consistent with residents of the greater area. On January 4, 2005, the Board authorized Airport staff to enter into a Consulting Services Agreement (Agreement) with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company. The Agreement had a three year term which ended on December 31, 2008. During project development it became necessary to undertake a General Plan Amendment in order to implement the master plan when it was completed. The General Plan Amendment took approximately ten months to complete and, as a result, the project completion was delayed. The added time also caused us to re-evaluate the baseline data that was used for the FAR Part 150 Noise Study as the trends in the aviation industry were rapidly changing during this same time. Thus, additional funds were necessary to complete an executive summary and environmental review for the master plan and the additional $34,200 in added funding for FY 2009-2010 is necessary to complete the data for the FAR Part 150 Noise Study. As a result, the Agreement needs to be extended by twelve (12) months, or until December 31, 2009, to provide sufficient time to complete the FAR Part 150 Noise Study. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the consultant contract agreement with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company is not approved, the Buchanan Field If the consultant contract agreement with Barnard Dunkelberg & Company is not approved, the Buchanan Field Airport FAR Part 150 Noise Study will not be completed as required by the FAA grant. ATTACHMENTS BD Consult Contract Extension-MasterPlan/Part 150 Noise Signed Agreement RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT Grant of Easement dated December 11, 2008, from Discovery Builders, Inc., a California Corporation. DIRECT the Real Property Division to have the above referenced Grant of Easement recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. FISCAL IMPACT: Funding is 100% Contra Costa Flood Control and Water Conservation District Permit Fees. BACKGROUND: These property rights are required for access to Drainage Area 30C, Lines A & B for flood control maintenance in accordance with approved plans and specifications. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted the previously adopted City of Brentwood Prewett Ranch Mitigated Negative Declaration on April 25, 2006. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The District will not have sufficient land rights for flood control access in accordance with approved plans and specifications. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Olivia Reynolds, 313-2306 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: Irma Bergeron C.7 To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Subdivision 8954 (Prewett Ranch) DA 30C, Lines A & B & Anderson Lane Ext. - Flood Control Access Easements, Brentwood area. ATTACHMENTS Grant of Easement RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE this report concerning the personal property loss of David Adams and authorize payment in the amount of $418.00. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Risk Management has reviewed and investigated the claim presented by David Adams and is recommending payment for his personal property loss. Risk Management has determined that payment is appropriate under the compensation for loss or damage to Personal Property Policy as noted in Admin. Bulletin 313.1. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ron Harvey, Risk Manager, (335-1443) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: C.8 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ronald Harvey, Risk Manager Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Personal Property Reimbursement ATTACHMENTS demand RECOMMENDATION(S): FISCAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: C.9 To:Board of Supervisors From:COB Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Claims RECOMMENDATION(S): FISCAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: C.10 To:Board of Supervisors From:COB Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Claim RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE this report concerning the final settlement of Duane Struntz and authorize payment from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund in an amount not to exceed $55,000, less permanent disability payments. FISCAL IMPACT: Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund payment of $55,000, and continuing of $17,820 and liability for lifetime medical care. BACKGROUND: Mary Jo Castruccio, Assistant Risk Manager/Workers' Compensation, has advised the County Administrator that within authorization, an agreement has been reached settling the workers' compensation claim of Duane Struntz v. Contra Costa County. The Board's February 3, 2009 closed session vote was Supervisors Gioia, Uilkema, Piepho, Bonilla, and Glover - Yes. This action is taken so that terms of this final settlement and the earlier February 3, 2009 closed session vote of this Board authorizing its negotiated settlement are known publicly. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ron Harvey, Risk Manager (335-1443) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: C.11 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ronald Harvey, Risk Manager Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Final Settlement of Claim Duane Struntz v. County of Contra Costa, WCAB No. 52235 RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE this report concerning the final settlement of Angela Poole and authorize payment from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund in the amount of $50,000 with open lifetime medical. FISCAL IMPACT: Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund payment of $50,000 with open lifetime medical. BACKGROUND: Mary Jo Castruccio, Assistant Risk Manager/Workers' Compensation, has advised the County Administrator that within authorization, an agreement has been reached settling the workers' compensation claim of Angela Poole v. Contra Costa County. The Board's February 3, 2009 closed session vote was Supervisors Gioia, Uilkema, Piepho, Bonilla, and Glover - Yes. This action is taken so that terms of this final settlement and the earlier February 3, 2009 closed session vote of this Board authorizing the negotiated settlment are known publicly. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ron Harvey, Risk Manager (335-1443) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: C.12 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ronald Harvey, Risk Manager Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Final Settlement of Claim Angela Poole v. County of Contra Costa, WCAB #2898883 RECOMMENDATION(S): FISCAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: C.13 To:Board of Supervisors From:COB Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE Minutes RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Meeting Attendance Reports for the month of January 2009 from the members of the Board of Supervisors as required for compliance with Government Code Section 53232.3(d). FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Government Code section 53232.3(d) requires that members of legislative bodies report on meetings attended for which there has been expense reimbursement (mileage, meals, lodging, etc.), or other compensation. The attached reports on meetings attended by the Supervisors during the month of January 2009 are submitted in compliance with the requirement. The lists of meetings do not represent all meetings attended by the Supervisors, but only those for which reimbursement or stipends were received. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: C.14 To:Board of Supervisors From:County Administrator David J. Twa Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Board Member Montly Meeting Reports ATTACHMENTS Bd Mtgs APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jane I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.15 To:Board of Supervisors From:Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Caring Hands ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution Resolution No. 2009/82 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2009/82 IN THE MATTER OF RECOGNIZING THE CARING HANDS VOLUNTEER CAREGIVER PROGRAM’S 10th ANNIVERSARY WHEREAS, Caring Hands Volunteer Caregivers Program was founded in August 1998, Caring Hands volunteers have logged more than 140,000 hours of service since its inauguration; and WHEREAS, Caring Hands has attempted to meet a remarkable and growing need for volunteer services in Central, South and East Contra Costa County since 1998; and WHEREAS, Caring Hands Volunteer Caregivers Program is to promote independence and enhance the quality of life of the aging population in the Contra Costa County community through meaningful, one-on-one relationships with caring volunteers; and WHEREAS, Caring Hands mission is to create one-on-one matches between caring volunteers and seniors in need who may be frail, isolated, or disabled over the age of 60, enabling them to stay in their homes, and remain independent, as long as safety possible by providing free non-medical in-home assistance; and WHEREAS, Caring Hands Volunteer Caregivers Program services include: friendly phone calling (in conjunction with any other service), friendly visiting and companionship, transportation and escort to medical appointments and other needed services, assistance with shopping and errands, respite care (or rest for the family caregiver), reading mail and letter writing, light household tasks and light meal preparation, minor home repairs and yard work; and WHEREAS, Caring Hands Volunteer Caregivers Program in 2006 added a Hispanic Outreach program speaking volunteers and is serving 28 Hispanic seniors; and WHEREAS, The Caring Hands Volunteer Caregivers Program in 2007 was awarded Transportation provider of the year by Contra Costa County Advisory Council on Aging; and WHEREAS, The Caring Hands Volunteer Caregivers Program Senior Transporting Program is currently serving 78 seniors with occasional transportation to and from Medical appointments; and WHEREAS, Caring Hands statistics for Contra Costa County reveal that during the period from 1900-2010 there will be 237% increase in the 85 plus age group. In addition, the statistics for the same period indicate nearly 155,000 people will join the 55 plus population or more than one in four households will need the type of assistance Caring Hands provides; and WHEREAS, Caring Hands Volunteer Caregivers Program continues to grow each year to serve more seniors, currently, serving more than 406 seniors and totaling 388 volunteers. Caring Hands is looking forward to expansion to serve even more seniors in the coming years; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS recognizes and honors the Caring Hands Volunteer Caregivers Program for their continued commitment to the Contra Costa County aging community and congratulates them on their 10th Anniversary. recognizes and honors the Caring Hands Volunteer Caregivers Program for their continued commitment to the Contra Costa County aging community and congratulates them on their 10th Anniversary. ___________________ SUSAN A. BONILLA Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA GAYLE B. UILKEMA District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ MARY N. PIEPHO FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy RECOMMENDATION(S): FISCAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ruth I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.16 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ruth Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Honor & Proclomation ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2009/62 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/24/2009 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2009/62          Contact: Ruth   I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown.  ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors   By: , Deputy cc: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kate Rauch 510-374-3231 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.17 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution Honoring Walter Pedretti the San Pablo Chamber of Commerce Citizen of the Year ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution Resolution No. 2009/79 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2009/79 Honoring Walter Pedretti as the San Pablo Chamber of Commerce 2009 Citizen of the Year Walter A. Pedretti was born in San Pablo, California in 1922; and Whereas, Walter Pedretti attended local schools and graduated from Richmond High in 1940, and Whereas, Mr. Pedretti worked in local industry until he joined the U.S. Army in 1942; gaining the rank of Sergeant; and Whereas, Walter Pedretti served in the South Pacific until he was discharged in 1945, and Whereas, Mr. Pedretti left the military to become an officer in San Pablo's first police department; and Whereas, Walter Pedretti became Police Chief in 1949 and served in that capacity for 26 years until retiring on November 30, 1977; and Whereas, Chief Pedretti was the youngest police chief in the state and holds the record of the state's longest serving police chief; and Whereas, Chief Pedretti has been a property owner in San Pablo for 40 years; and Whereas, Walter Pedretti has served on numerous community boards and groups including as a director of Boy's Club for more than 20 years; on the Salvation Army Advisory Board; as Chairman of the Guide Dogs for the Blind fun-drive; and as co-chair of the West County Boy Scout Fund-Drive; and Whereas, Mr. Pedretti holds Honorary Life Memberships of the PTA, the San Pablo Eagles, and the VFW; and serves as vice-president of the San Pablo Chamber of Commerce Whereas, Walter Pedretti and his wife Phyllis were married in 1948 and are the proud parents of three daughters and five grandchildren; That the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County honor Walter A. Pedretti's inspirational years of service to the people of San Pablo and West Contra Costa and congratulate him for being named the San Pablo Chamber of Commerce Citizen of the year. ___________________ SUSAN A. BONILLA Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA GAYLE B. UILKEMA District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ MARY N. PIEPHO FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kate Rauch, 510-374-3231 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.18 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution Honoring Doctors Medical Center Regional Cancer Center as the San Pablo Chamber of Commerce Business of the Year ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution Resolution No. 2009/80 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2009/80 Honoring the Regional Cancer Center at Doctors Medical Center as the San Pablo Chamber of Commerce Business of the Year. The Regional Cancer Center at Doctors Medical Center in San Pablo was created with the vision of providing comprehensive cancer treatments for patients and their families; and Whereas: The Regional Cancer Center at Doctors Medical Center was opened in the early 1990s; and Whereas: The Cancer Center at Doctor's Medical Center was named the J.C. Robinson, MD Regional Cancer Center for dedicated community physician Dr. Robinson; and Whereas: Since it opened, the Cancer Center has offered comprehensive cancer service including diagnostics and treatments, in addition to support groups and patient resources; and Whereas: The Regional Cancer Center is committed to the advancement of treatments through clinical trials and research; and Whereas: The Regional Cancer Center prides itself on being a place of hope, with quality service in a supportive environment; and Whereas: The Regional Cancer Center includes a Breast Care Center; and Whereas: The Regional Cancer Center earned in 2008 the Commission on Cancer's Outstanding Achievement Award, one of 54 recipients in the country; and Whereas: The Regional Cancer Center is one of two centers in Northern California and seven in the state to receive this distinguished award; and Whereas: The Regional Cancer Center is home to a team of excellent, devoted doctors, nurses and staff, including two physicians recently recognized for their work, Brenda Shank, MC, PhD, radiation Oncologist; and Stuart Gourlay, MD, Surgeon; and Whereas: After two decades of providing comprehensive cancer care to the community, the professional team of the Regional Cancer Center at Doctors Medical Center is committed to continuing this service; That the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County honor the Regional Cancer Center at Doctors Medical Center in San Pablo for being named the San Pablo Chamber of Commerce Business of the Year; ___________________ SUSAN A. BONILLA Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA GAYLE B. UILKEMA District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ MARY N. PIEPHO FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy RECOMMENDATION(S): FISCAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ruth I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.19 To:Board of Supervisors From:COB Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Honor & Proclomation APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kate Rauch 510-374-3231 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.20 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution Honoring El Cerrito Police Commander Gary E. Priebe on his retirement. ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution Resolution No. 2009/81 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2009/81 Congratulating El Cerrito Police Commander Gary E. Priebe on his retirement after thirty years of distinguished service. Whereas: Gary E. Priebe, Police Commander of the El Cerrito Police Department was born in Richmond, Ca., raised in El Sobrante and is a graduate of De Anza High School and San Jose State University; and Whereas: Gary Priebe began his law enforcement career with the El Cerrito Police on June 4, 1979; and Whereas: Commander Priebe has held numerous assignments during his 30 year career with the El Cerrito Police, including as a Laboratory Identification Supervisor; Field Training Officer; on the Crisis Negotiation Team; in the Detective Bureau; as a Senior Office; Police Corporal; Police Sergeant; Detective Sergeant, Patrol Sergeant; Administrative Sergeant; and Police Commander; and Whereas: Gary Priebe has served his entire police career with efficiency, competency, and distinction; and Whereas: Commander Priebe, like his colleagues in Professional Law Enforcement, devoted his time and energy to the safety of his fellow citizens; and Whereas: Gary Priebe and his wife Laura have raised two children, Heather and Ryan; and Whereas: After serving the citizens of El Cerrito and Contra Costa County as a police officer for almost 30 years, Commander Priebe retired in December 2008; and That the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County honor El Cerrito Police Commander Gary Priebe on his distinguished public service to the safety and welfare of the people of El Cerrito and Contra Costa County and congratulate him on his retirement. ___________________ SUSAN A. BONILLA Chair, District IV Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA GAYLE B. UILKEMA District I Supervisor District II Supervisor ______________________________________ MARY N. PIEPHO FEDERAL D. GLOVER District III Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.21 To:Board of Supervisors From: Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject: RECOMMENDATION(S): FISCAL IMPACT: BACKGROUND: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ruth I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.22 To:Board of Supervisors From:COB Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Honor & Proclomation RECOMMENDATION(S): On behalf of the Advisory Council on Aging, it is recommended that the Board of Supervisors take the following action: Declare vacant the Member-at-Large Seat #9 held by Mr. John Cambus and direct the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy. Mr. Cambus was formally notified on January 11, 2009 that due to excessive absenteeism his seat was to be declared vacant. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Mr. Cambus has been removed from membership on the Advisory Council, and it is necessary to fill this vacancy in an effort to bring the Advisory Council to its required number of active members. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925.313.1648 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: Susan Brown, Jamie Ray, John Cottrell, Elaine Burres, Earl Maciel C.23 To:Board of Supervisors From:Joe Valentine, Employment & Human Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Advisory Council on Aging Vacancy RECOMMENDATION(S): Reappoint the following individual to the District IV Seat of the Fish & Wildlife Committee for a two-year term expiring on February 28, 2011: Bruce C. Weisenbach 337 Avenida Flores Pacheco, CA 94553 FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Supervisor Bonilla has approved this reappointment. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Laura Case 521-7100 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.24 To:Board of Supervisors From:Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Reappointment to the Fish & Wildlife Committee RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Michael Murray as the County Planning Commission representative on TRANSPAC, as recommended by the County Planning Commission. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: TRANSPAC (formally called Transportation Planning Partnership and Cooperation) is the regional transportation planning committee for Central County. All cities and the County must participate in the regional transportation committees to be eligible for their return-to-source allocations under the local transportation sales tax program (Measure C and Measure J). The Board of Supervisors appoints two members of TRANSPAC: a Supervisor and a Planning Commissioner. The Planning Commission recommends the appointment of Michael Murray to fill its vacant seat on TRANSPAC. The previous representative, Donald Snyder, reliquished the seat recently due to a change in his daily schedule that made it difficult for him to attend the TRANSPAC meetings. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 335-1201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: Michael Murray, County Planning Commission, Barbara Neustadter, TRANSPAC C.25 To:Board of Supervisors From:Catherine Kutsuris, Conservation & Development Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointment of County Planning Commission Representative to TRANSPAC RECOMMENDATION(S): Reappoint the following individual to the District IV seat on the Contra Costa Commission for Women to a three-year term expiring on February 28, 2012. Caryln Suzanne Obringer 1655 Galindo St. #1320 Concord, Ca 94520 FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Supervisor Bonilla recommends Ms. Obringer's reappointment. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Laura Case 521-7100 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.26 To:Board of Supervisors From:Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Reappointment to the Contra Costa Commission for Women RECOMMENDATION(S): Reappoint the following individual to the District IV seat on the Aviation Advisory Committee to a two-year term expiring March 1, 2011. Thomas R. Weber 503 Skyview Court Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Supervisor Bonilla recommends Mr. Weber's reappointment. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Laura Case 521-7100 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.27 To:Board of Supervisors From:Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Reappointment to the Aviation Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the resignation of the following person from the Appointee 3 Seat of the Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District's Fire Advisory Commissioners effective February 1, 2009: Frank Ochinero 1315 Rose Street Crockett, CA 94525 DECLARE a vacancy on the Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District's Fire Advisory Commissioners and direct the Clerk of the Board to apply the Board's policy for filling the vacancy. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: None. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 335-1046 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: Maddy Book, Supervisor District 2, Crockett-Carquinez FPD, Appointee C.28 To:Board of Supervisors From:Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Resignation from the Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District's Fire Advisory Commissioners RECOMMENDATION(S): Appoint the following individual to the District IV Public Sector on the Economic Opportunity Council to a term expiring June 30, 2010: Florence Weiss 1380 Rising Dawn Lane Concord, CA 94521 FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Supervisor Bonilla has approved this appointment. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Laura Case 521-7100 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.29 To:Board of Supervisors From:Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointment to the Economic Opportunity Council RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the resignation of the following person from the District II Family Member #2 Seat of the Contra Costa County Mental Health Commission effective January 23, 2008: Jacque C. McLaughlin 380 Mill Road Martinez, CA 94553 DECLARE a vacancy on the Contra Costa County Mental Health Commission and direct the Clerk of the Board to apply the Board's policy for filling the vacancy. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE. BACKGROUND: NONE. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jill Ray, 335-1046 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: Maddy Book, Supervisor District 2, Mental Health Commission, Karen Shuler, Appointee C.30 To:Board of Supervisors From:Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Resignation from the Contra Costa County Mental Health Commission RECOMMENDATION(S): RE-APPOINT the following person to the District II Seat of the Fish and Wildlife Committee for a two-year term with an expiration date of February 28, 2011: Mr. Daniel Pellegrini 2207 Boulder Creek Court Martinez, CA 94553 FISCAL IMPACT: NONE. BACKGROUND: NONE. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jill Ray, 335-1046 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: Maddy Book, Supervisor District 2, Fish & Wildlife Committee, Appointee C.31 To:Board of Supervisors From:Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:REAPPOINTMENT TO THE FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION(S): RE-APPOINT the following person to the San Pablo Member Seat of the Western CCC Transit Authority Board of Directors for a two-year term with an expiration date of December 31, 2010: Dr. Maureen Powers 2771 Sargent Avenue San Pablo, CA 94806 FISCAL IMPACT: NONE. BACKGROUND: NONE. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jill Ray 335-1046 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: Maddy Book, Supervisor District 2, WestCAT, Appointee, John Greitzer C.32 To:Board of Supervisors From:Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:RE-APPOINTMENT TO THE WESTERN CCC TRANSIT AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDATION(S): REAPPOINT the following people to the following seats of the County Service Area R-10 Citizens Advisory Committee for a two-year term with an expiration date of June 30, 2010: Appointee 4 Ms. Suzanne Board 411 Parker Avenue Rodeo, CA 94572 Appointee 7 Ms. Josephine Orozco 1108 Mahoney Street Rodeo, CA 94572 FISCAL IMPACT: NONE. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jill Ray 335-1046 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: Maddy Book, Supervisor District 2, Victoria Skerritt, Appointees C.33 To:Board of Supervisors From:Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-10 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE BACKGROUND: NONE. RECOMMENDATION(S): REAPPOINT the following people to the following seats of the County Service Area R-10 Citizens Advisory Committee for a two-year term with and expiration date of June 30, 2010: Appointee 2 Connie Batchelder 1016 Sandpoint Drive Rodeo, CA 94572 Appointee 4 Mary T. Tabor 610 Rodeo Avenue Rodeo, CA 94572 FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: None. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jill Ray, 335-1046 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: Maddy Book, Supervisor District 2, Vicotria Skerritt, Appointees C.34 To:Board of Supervisors From:Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE COUNTY SERVICE AREA R-10 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION(S): DECLARE VACANT, Seat C6, Air Medical Transportation Provider - Alternate, on the Emergency Medical Care Committee (EMCC) and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy as recommended by the Health Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Resignation by Seat C6 Appointee, Randy Lyman, MD, was submitted to the EMCC on February 2, 2009. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Art Lathrop, 313-9560 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Juleine Latteri, Barbara Borbon C.35 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE COMMITTEE SEAT VACANCY RECOMMENDATION(S): REAPPOINT Silvano B. Marchesi to be County Counsel commencing February 1 through December 31, 2009. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Silvano B. Marchesi was appointed as County Counsel as of February 1, 2001, and was reappointed on February 1, 2005. Government Code section 27641 provides for a four-year term. The Board conducted a performance evaluation of the County Counsel on February 3, 2009. On the basis of that performance review, I recommend that Mr. Marchesi be reappointed. As Mr. Marchesi has indicated he plans to retire at the end of 2009, I recommend that the reappointment coincide with his retirement from the County. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Luis Quinonez 521-7100 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.36 To:Board of Supervisors From:Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Reappoint Silvano B. Marchesi as County Counsel to Contra Costa County RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE Appropriations and Revenue Adjustment No. ____ authorizing new revenue in the Cooperative Extension program in the amount of $14,960 from a grant with University of Davis, Sea Grant program, and appropriating it for the salaries and wages. FISCAL IMPACT: This action provides appropriations and revenue to Cooperative Extension to fund services being provided under contract with the University of California, Davis, Sea Grant program. No match is required. BACKGROUND: Cooperative Extension is a joint effort of the County and the University of California (UC). The UC has found that they need some additional services that were not contemplated when the division of duties was first established between the County and UC. There is available staff time for Cooperative Extension to provide these services. Approval of this request will provide the revenue and expenditure authority needed to provide the requested services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dorothy Sansoe, 335-1009 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Shelley Murdock, Dorothy Sansoe, Auditor-Controller C.37 To:Board of Supervisors From:Cooperative Extension Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Appropriation Adjustment for Sea Grant ATTACHMENTS Sea Grant TC 24 Sea Grant TC 27 (M 129 Rev. 2/09 CAO) C:\DOCUME~1\DESTIN~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@C4107797\@BCL@C4107797.doc CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ESTIMATED REVENUE ADJUSTMENT T/C-24 ACCOUNT CODING BUDGET UNIT: 0630 Cooperative Extension ORGANIZATION REVENUE ACCOUNT REVENUE ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION INCREASE <DECREASE> 0630 9595 Misc Govt Agencies 14,960.00 TOTALS 14,960.00 0.00 APPROVED EXPLANATION OF REQUEST To appropriate revenue and expenses related to the provision of services by Coopertive Extension staff to the University of Davis under the Sea Grant project. AUDITOR – CONTROLLER By: Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR By: Date BOARD OF SUPERVISORS YES: NO: PREPARED BY: Dorothy Sansoe TITLE: Sr. Deputy County Administrator DATE: 2/9/2009 By: Date REVENUE ADJ. RAOO 5060 JOURNAL NO. (M 129 Rev. 2/09) C:\DOCUME~1\DESTIN~1\LOCALS~1\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 7\@BCL@0809B2AF\@BCL@0809B2AF.doc AUDITOR-CONTROLLER USE ONLY: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FINAL APPROVAL NEEDED BY: APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS T/C-27 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ACCOUNT CODING BUDGET UNIT: 0630 Cooperative Extension ORGANIZATION EXPENDITURE SUB-ACCOUNT EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION < DECREASE > INCREASE 0630 1011 Salaries and Wages 14,960.00 0990 6301 Appropriable New Revenue 14,960.00 0990 6301 Reservces for Contingencies 14960.00 14,960.00 29,920.00 APPROVED EXPLANATION OF REQUEST To appropriate revenue and expenses related to the provision of services by Coopertive Extension staff to the University of Davis under the Sea Grant project. AUDITOR – CONTROLLER By: Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR By: Date BOARD OF SUPERVISORS YES: NO: PREPARED BY: Dorothy Sansoe TITLE: Sr. Deputy County Administrator DATE: 02/09/2009 By: Date APPROPRIATION APOO 5060 ADJ. JOURNAL NO. SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE SIDE RECOMMENDATION(S): INCREASE hours for one (1) Board of Supervisors Assistant - Specialist (J994) position #12168 from part time (32/40) to full time (40/40); and ADD one (1) Board of Supervisors Assistant - General Secretary (J993) part time position (24/40). FISCAL IMPACT: Cost for increasing hours of position #12168 is within the District IV budget. Cost for creating an additional 0.60 FTE will be paid for out of CC FUTURES FUND. BACKGROUND: The District IV Supervisor’s office has been active in the development and oversight of the CCFutures Fund since its inception and that role is expected to increase in the coming years. In anticipation of their expanded role, District IV elected to fill a vacant 0.20 FTE by making a 0.80 FTE a 1.0 FTE. The cost this fiscal year will be $7,878. The annual cost will be $18,907. On January 27, 2009 the Board of Supervisors approved APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO:Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Contact: Gladys Scott-Reid, 335-1722 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: C.39 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ted Cwiek, Human Resources Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:District IV Position Adjustment BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) the allocation of CC FUTURES FUND dollars to pay for an additional 0.60 FTE. The cost this fiscal year will be $27,086. The annual cost will be $65,006. The total cost for these actions this fiscal year will be $34,964. The total annual cost for these actions will be $83,913. ATTACHMENTS Jill Ryan P300 Laura Case POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. DATE 2/26/2015 Department No./ Department Board of Supervisors - District IV Budget Unit No. 0001 Org No. 1104 Agency No. 01 Action Requested: CREATE one (1) Board of Supervisors Assistant - General Secretary (J993) part time position (24/40). Proposed Effective Date: 2/1/2009 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $27,086.00 Net County Cost $27,086.00 Total this FY $65,006.00 N.C.C. this FY $65,006.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT CC FUTURES FUND Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. 2/1/2009(Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 2/26/2015 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have consi dered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. DATE 2/26/2015 Department No./ Department Board of Supervisors - District IV Budget Unit No. 0001 Org No. 1104 Agency No. 01 Action Requested: INCREASE hours for one (1) Board of Supervisors Assistant - Specialist (J994) position #12168 from part time (32/40) to full time (40/40)position (24/40). Proposed Effective Date: 2/1/2009 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $7,878.00 Net County Cost $7,878.00 Total this FY $18,907.00 N.C.C. this FY $18,907.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Within Department Budget Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. 2/1/2009(Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 2/26/2015 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have consi dered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): INCREASE the hours of one (1) Board of Supervisors Assistant - Specialist (J994) position #11444 from part time (20/40) to full time (40/40). FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Keller Canyon Mitigation Funds BACKGROUND: On November 19, 1996, the Board of Supervisors approved a recommendation of the Finance Committee to implements a Pilot Code Enforcement Program in District IV. Usuing Keller Canyon Mitigation Funds, District IV has a 0.50 FTE dedicated to this program. This recommended action is to increase the the FTE from 0.50 to 1.0. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO:Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Contact: Gladys Scott-Reid I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: C.46 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ted Cwiek, Human Resources Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:District V Position Adjustment ATTACHMENTS Adler P300 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. DATE 2/26/2015 Department No./ Department Board of Supervisors - District V Budget Unit No. 0001 Org No. 1105 Agency No. 01 Action Requested: INCREASE hours for one (1) Board of Supervisors Assistant - Specialist (J994) position #11444 from part time (20/40) to full time (40/40). Proposed Effective Date: 2/1/2009 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $24,382.00 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $48,763.00 N.C.C. this FY $0 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Kelley Canyon Mitigation Funds Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. 2/1/2009(Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 2/26/2015 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have consi dered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): Acting as the Governing Body for the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority (IHSS PA) ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/ which implements personnel rules to be used by the IHSS PA, as recommended by the County Administrator. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact from adopting of these rules. BACKGROUND: The In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority (IHSS PA) provides oversight of providers of services in the community, maintains a provider registry, enrolls providers into the payroll system, and provides other support services to the IHSS program. Historically, the employees of the IHSS Public Authority have been provided similar benefits as provided to employees of Contra Costa County. As a separate employer, the IHSS PA needs specific personnel rules in order to operate efficiently. These personnel rules are similar to the County's Personnel Managment Regulations (PMRs) which guides County employment. However, because the IHSS PA employees are not governed by the County PMR's, separate rules should be adopted by the Board acting as the Governing Body for the IHSS PA. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dorothy Sansoe, 335-1009 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Human Resources, EHSD, County Administration C.41 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Adoption of Personnel Rules for IHSS Public Authority ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2009/56 IHSS Personnel Rules THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/24/2009 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2009/56 Adopting Personnel Rules for the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority WHEREAS, the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority (IHSS PA) has requested, and the County Administrator has recommended, that the Board of Supervisors, acting in their capacity as the IHSS PA governing body, adopt personnel rules governing the employees of the IHSS PA, and WHEREAS, it is beneficial to the IHSS PA and its employees to have clear rules governing personnel issues, and WHEREAS, County Counsel has prepared and recommends the attached rules, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors in its capacity as the Governing Board of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority, adopts the Personnel Rules of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority (attached). Contact: Dorothy Sansoe, 335-1009 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Human Resources, EHSD, County Administration Page 1 of 4 PERSONNEL RULES OF THE IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PUBLIC AUTHORITY I. COVERAGE OF THE PERSONNEL RULES 1.1 The following Personnel Rules of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority (“IHSS PA”) apply to all IHSS PA employees. Any of these Personnel Rules may be suspended, deleted, or modified as deemed necessary by the IHSS PA Governing Board. 1.2 The IHSS PA is a public entity separate from the County of Contra Costa, and therefore IHSS PA employees are not County employees for any purpose and are not governed by any County personnel rules or regulations, except as otherwise specifically provided. 1.3 These Personnel Rules do not apply to IHSS Individual Providers. II. EMPLOYEES 2.1 At-Will Employment Policy. Employment with the IHSS PA is at-will. IHSS PA employees are at-will employees. Employees can terminate their employment at any time, and the IHSS PA can terminate an employee’s employment at any time, with or without cause and with or without notice. Any prior agreements or understandings are superceded by this policy. The at-will nature of any employee’s employment cannot be changed without the express written consent of the IHSS PA Governing Board. Only the IHSS PA’s Governing Board can change the at-will nature of the Executive Director’s employment. 2.2 Employee Evaluations. Employees will be evaluated by the Executive Director or designee annually. The Executive Director or designee will review each evaluation with the subject employee. Employees will be entitled to a copy of the evaluation. The Executive Director’s performance will be evaluated annually by the Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Department’s Aging and Adult Services Director or designee. III.WORK SCHEDULE AND WORK WEEK 3.1 R egular W o rk S ch ed u l e: The regu l a r w o rk schedule is eigh t (8 ) h o u rs per day, Monday through Friday, inclusive, for a total of forty (40) hours per week. Page 2 of 4 3.2 Flexible Work Schedule: A flexible work schedule is when the employee is regularly scheduled to work other than eight (8) hours per day between Monday and Friday, inclusive. 3.3.4/10 Work Schedule: A 4/10 work schedule is four (4) ten hour days in a seven (7) day period, for a total of forty (40) hours per week. 3.4 9/80 Work Schedule: A 9/80 work schedule is where an employee works a recurring schedule of thirty six (36) hours in one calendar week and forty four (44) hours in the next calendar week, but only forty (40) hours in the designated work week. In the thirty six (36) hour calendar week, the employee works four (4) nine (9) hour days and has the same day of the week off that is worked for eight (8) hours in the forty four (44) hour calendar week. In the forty four (44) hour calendar week, the employee works four (4) nine (9) hour days and one eight (8 ) h o u r d ay. 3.5 Work week for Employees on Regular, Flexible, and 4/10 Work Schedules: For employees on regular, flexible, and 4/10 work schedules, the work week begins at 12:01 a.m. on Monday and en d s a t 12 midnigh t on S u n d a y. 3.6 Work week for Employees on 9/80 Work Schedule: The 9/80 work week begins on the same day of the week as the employee’s eight (8) hour work day and regularly scheduled 9/80 day off. The start time of the work week is four (4) hours and one (1) minute after the start time of the eight (8) hour work day. The end time of the work week is four (4) hours after the eight (8) hour work day start time. The result is a work week that is a fixed and regularly recurring period of seven (7) consecutive twenty four (24) hour periods (168 hours). IV.4.1 Holidays: The IHSS PA will observe the following holidays: New Year’s Day Labor Day Martin Luther King Jr. Day Veterans’ Day Presidents’ Day Thanksgiving Day Memorial Day Day after Thanksgiving Independence Day Christmas Day 4.2 Employees on regular, flexible, 9/80, and 4/10 schedules are entitled to observe a holiday (day off work), without a reduction in pay, whenever a holiday is observed by the IHSS PA. Any holiday observed by the IHSS PA that falls on a Saturday is observed on the preceding Friday and any holiday that falls on a Sunday is obs erved o n the following M o n d ay. 4.3 Holidays - Flexible, 9/80 and 4/10 Work Schedules: When a holiday falls on the regularly scheduled day off of any employee who is on a flexible, 9/80, or 4/10 Page 3 of 4 work schedule, the employee is entitled to take the day off, without a reduction in pay, in recognition of the holiday. These employees are entitled to request another day off in recognition of their regularly scheduled day off. The requested day off must be within the same month and workweek as the holiday and it must be pre- approved by the employee’s supervisor. If the day off is not approved by the supervisor, it is lost. If the approved day off is a nine (9) hour workday, the employee must use one (1) hour of non-sick-leave accruals. If the approved day off is a ten (10) hour workday, the employee must use two (2) hours of non-sick- leave accruals. If the employee does not have any non-sick-leave accrual balances, leave without pay (AWOP) will be authorized. 4.4 Holidays - Part-Time Employees: Part-time employees are entitled to observe a holiday (day off work) in the same ratio as the number of hours in the part time employee’s weekly schedule bears to forty (40) hours. V.VACATION POLICY 5.1 The use of vacation leave is governed by these Personnel Rules and the policies of the Executive Director. 5.2 Employees will not be able to use accrued vacation time during the first six months of employment. 5.3 The timing of vacations will be subject to the approval of the Executive Director, depending on the needs of the IHSS PA. VI.SICK LEAVE POLICY 6.1 The primary purpose of paid sick leave is to help employees protect against loss of pay for temporary absences from work due to illness or injury. It may only be used as authorized, and is not intended for paid time off that employees may primarily use for personal activities. 6.2 Accumulated sick leave may be used, subject to the Executive Director’s approval, by an employee in pay status, but only in the following instances: a.When t h e employee is off wo rk b ecau se o f a temporary illnes s o r i n j u ry. b.When the employee receives medical or dental care or consultation. c.When the employee attends to a member of his or her immediate family who is ill or injured. d.When the employee attends a funeral or memorial service for a member of Page 4 of 4 his or her immediate family. Use of sick leave for this purpose may not exceed three working days, plus up to two (2) additional work days for necessary travel. e.When the employee attends to the birth of a child or the arrival of an adopted child. For purposes of this section, immediate family means spouse, son, stepson, daughter, stepdaughter, father, stepfather, mother, stepmother, brother, sister, grandparent, grandchild, niece, nephew, father-in-law, mother-in-law, daughter- in-law, son-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, foster children, aunt, uncle, cousin, stepbrother, stepsister, domestic partner of an employee, any other person for whom the employee is the legal guardian or conservator, or any person who is claimed as a dependent for IRS reporting purposes by the employee. 6.3 Employees have the following responsibilities in the administration of sick leave: a.The employee must notify the Executive Director or the employee’s direct supervisor of an absence before the start of the work day or as soon thereafter as possible. b.The employee must keep the Executive Director or the employee’s direct supervisor informed on a continuing basis of the probable date of return to work. c.The employee must complete and sign a form prescribed by the IHSS PA that states the dates and hours of absence and the reason for the absence. The use of sick leave may be denied if the employee does not carry out these responsibilities. 6.4 The IHSS PA may make reasonable inquiries about employee absences. The IHSS PA may require written verification from a physician for employee absences of three (3) or more working days. With cause, the IHSS PA may require written verification from a physician for employee absences of one (1) or more working days. XII.LEAVES OF ABSENCE 7.1 Except as required by law, employees are not entitled to leaves of absence. 7.2 To request a leave of absence without pay, an employee must submit a written request to the Executive Director stating the reasons for the request, the date when it is desired to begin the leave, and the probable date of return to work. RECOMMENDATION(S): Adopt Position Adjustment Resolution Number 20656, to cancel one permanent part-time (20/40) Librarian position #6224 (represented) and increase the hours of Librarian position # 12931 from 20/40 to 40/40 (represented) in the Library. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will result in an annual cost savings of $18,486. BACKGROUND: The Library is restructuring its operations to effectively administer its new strategic plan. This action will allow the library to implement its goal of centralized selection, reducing the time spent by community library staff on collection development and redirecting their time towards direct public service and community outreach. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 335-1715 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: C.42 To:Board of Supervisors From:Library Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:P-300 20656 ATTACHMENTS P 300 20656 P300 with Clerk's correction to effective date RECOMMENDATION(S): Adopt attached Resolution No. 2009/26 superseding Resolution No. 2008/715 regarding Compensation and Benefits for County Elected and Appointed Department Heads, Management, Exempt, and Unrepresented Employees for the period October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009 and until further notice. FISCAL IMPACT: Costs associated with changes will be included in department budgets. BACKGROUND: Effective upon adoption, this Resolution supersedes and replaces Resolution No. 2008/715 which was adopted on 11/28/2008. It includes the following changes and additions: Former Section 23.1 Executive Advanced Notice Differential has been deleted.1. Definitions in Section 1.11 have been added and others have been modified.2. Renumbering corrections have been made throughout the document.3. 4. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Human Resources Department, Human Resources Department, County Administrator, County Counsel, Auditor-Controller, Contra Costa County Employees' Retirement Association C.38 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ted Cwiek, Human Resources Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Compensation and Benefits Authorized for County Elected and Appointed Department Heads, Management, Exempt, and Unrepresented Employees BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) A new subsection (e). was added to Section 2.13. Section 2.12 (d) has been deleted. Subsections (a) and (c) of Section 2.13 and Section 2.23 have been modified. These changes revise the new health care tier for all unrepresented employees and officials hired, appointed, or elected after December 31, 2008, who do not receive their health care coverage through CalPERS. During employment, these officials and employees will have the same access to county health plans and monthly premium subsidies as similarly situated officials and employees hired on or before December 31, 2008. Separate rate pools are established for these employees and officials during employment and as retirees. Upon retirement, employees and officials with fifteen years of County service will have access to County health plans, but no County premium subsidy will be paid for any health or dental plans. Retirees and eligible family members may participate at their own expense. Corresponding modifications have been made to the new dental care tier for all unrepresented safety employees and safety officials hired, appointed, or elected after December 31, 2008, who receive health care coverage through CalPERS. The classifications of Director, Inpatient Nursing Operations and Chief of Detention Health Nursing Services have been added to Section 51. ATTACHMENTS Management Resolution Signed Resolution RECOMMENDATION(S): Adopt Position Adjustment Resolution Number 20646, to Increase the hours of one Driver Clerk (9QWA) position 6161 from permanent intermittent to Permanent part-time (20/40) in the Library. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will result in a Library cost of $10,564. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa County Library has had an increase in demand for their services. The volume of materials and number of stops has increased dramatically with delivery routes to (27) community libraries and service locations. The increase in hours is vital to maintain services to the public. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this request is not approved, the Contra Costa County Library will continue to have employees work over their designated number of hours assigned to their position and will not be able to meet the needs of the community. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Library I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: C.43 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ted Cwiek, Human Resources Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:P-20646 Increase Driver Clerk position 6161 from PI to 20/40 ATTACHMENTS P-300 #20646 P300 with Clerk's correction to effective date RECOMMENDATION(S): Adopt Position Adjustment Resolution Number 20648, to add one Permanent part-time (20/40) Driver Clerk (9QWA) position in the Library. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will result in a Library cost of $36,206. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa County Library has had an increase in demand for their services. The volume of materials and number of stops has increased dramatically with delivery routes to (27) community libraries and service locations. The increase in hours is vital to maintain services to the public CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this request is not approved, the Contra Costa County Library will continue to have employees work over their designated number of hours assigned to their position and will not be able to meet the needs of the community. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Library I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: C.44 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ted Cwiek, Human Resources Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:P-300 20648 Add one (1) 20/40 Driver Clerk Position to the Library ATTACHMENTS P-300 #20648 RECOMMENDATION(S): Adopt Position Adjustment Resolution Number 20663 to reduce the hours of one Deputy District Attorney-Basic Level position # 3775 from permanent full-time to part-time (20/40) and add one Deputy District Attorney Basic Level part-time 20/40 position and freeze new 20/40 Deputy District Attorney Basic Level position as recommended by the Assistant County Administrator-Human Resources Director FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will result in an annual cost of $5,500. Current year salary savings due to one 20/40 vacancy. BACKGROUND: A current Deputy District Attorney Basic Level has asked to reduce her hours to part-time from full-time when she returns from Maternity Leave. The District Attorney’s Office has agreed to reduce her hours however they would like to add an additional District Attorney Basic Level 20/40 position. It is there intent to leave the second 20/40 position vacant, therefore incurring a salary savings in compliance with their vacancy factor. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: District Attorney I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: C.45 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ted Cwiek, Human Resources Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:P-300 20663 Reduce the hours Deputy Distrist Attorney Position # 3775 and add one 20/40 Deputy District Attorney position BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this request is not approved the department will not be able to accommodate their employees request to reduce her hours. ATTACHMENTS P300 20663 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACKNOWLEDGE that the Board of Supervisors, acting as the Governing Body of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority (IHSS PA) has historically treated the employees of the IHSS PA in a manner similar to employees of the County with regard to pay and benefits. ACKNOWLEDGE that the Board of Supervisors, from time to time, takes action to revise the structure of benefits provided to County employees, but to date has had no single document detailing benefits for employees of the IHSS PA; ADOPT attached Resolution no. 2009/ regarding compensation and benefits for employees of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority (IHSS PA). FISCAL IMPACT: Totall annual fiscal impact is approximately $480, of which 50% is Federal, 35% is State and 15% is County. This increase in cost results from an increase in the amount of the supplemental bi-lingual pay for two IHSS PA employees to reflect what County employees receive. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dorothy Sansoe, 335-1009 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Human Resources, County Administrator, County Counsel, Auditor-Controller, In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority C.40 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Benefits Authorized for Employees of In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority BACKGROUND: The In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority provides oversight of providers of services in the community, maintains a provider registry, enrolls providers into the payroll system, and provides other support services to the IHSS program. Historically, the fourteen at will employees of the IHSS Public Authority have been provided similar benefits as provided to employees of Contra Costa County. These benefits have never been outlined and specified in one comprehensive document. The proposed resolution will supersede previous actions pertaining to the benefits provided to the IHSS Public Authority staff and, for the first time, document the benefits being provided. These benefits mirror those provided to unrepresented County employees. ATTACHMENTS Reso ExA Resolution No. 2009/65 RESOLUTION NO. 2009/65 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Acting in its capacity as the Governing Body of the In-Hom e S upportive S ervices P ublic Authority Adopted this Order on by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SUBJECT:Compensation and Benefits Authorized for Employees of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority for the Period of January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 and Until Further Order ) ) ) ) Resolution No. 2009/65 ) ) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors acting in its capacity as the Governing Body of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority RESOLVES THAT: Effective upon adoption and continuing to December 31, 2009, and until further order of the Board, the Board adopts the following program of compensation and benefits for the employees of the In- Home Supportive Services Public Authority. Except for Resolution No. 2002/608 (excluding inconsistent provisions concerning the amount of employee contributions for retirement benefits), this Resolution supercedes all previous resolutions providing compensation and benefits for the employees of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority. Unless expressly provided otherwise, this Resolution is subject to the provisions of the 1937 County Employees Retirement Act. This Resolution does not authorize compensation and benefits for any employee who is represented by an employee organization with a Memorandum of Understanding. Unless otherwise expressly provided, compensation and benefits under this Resolution are authorized only for permanent and project employees of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority who work full-time or part-time, twenty (20) or more hours per week. I.BENEFITS FO R ALL EMPLOYEES OF IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PUBLIC AUTHORITY (IHSS PA) are provided for those classes listed in Exhibit A. II.BENEFITS ONLY FOR MANAGEMENT AND EXEMPT EMPLOYEES OF IHSS PA are provided for those classes listed in Exhibit A, except for the classes listed in Exhibit B. Orig Dept.:County Administrator - Dorothy Sansoe (335-1009) Human Resources Department - Ted Cwick cc:County Administrator - Lisa Driscoll County Counsel - Vickie L. Dawes Auditor–Controller - Elizabeth Verigin In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority - Jan Watson Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Association EXHIBIT A Unit Job Title Code Job Code ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES ASSISTANT II – PA 8I 8IH9 PROGRAM MANAGER – PA 8I 8IH2 PUBLIC AUTHORITY SECRETARY – ADVANCED 8I 8IH0 PUBLIC AUTHORITY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 8I 8IH1 PUBLIC AUTHORITY ACCOUNT CLERK SUPERVISOR 8I 8IH5 REGISTRY/TRAINING SPECIALIST – PA 8I 8IH3 OFFICE MANAGER/SECRETARY – PA 8J 8IH4 PUBLIC AUTHORITY 311 BENEFITS CLERK 8J 8IH8 PUBLIC AUTHORITY BENEFITS CLERK 8J 8IH6 PUBLIC AUTHORITY SENIOR BENEFITS CLERK 8J 8IH7 EXHIBIT B Unit Job Title Code Job Code OFFICE MANAGER/SECRETARY – PA 8J 8IH4 PUBLIC AUTHORITY 311 BENEFITS CLERK 8J 8IH8 PUBLIC AUTHORITY BENEFITS CLERK 8J 8IH6 PUBLIC AUTHORITY SENIOR BENEFITS CLERK 8J 8IH7 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/24/2009 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2009/65 Compensation and Benefits Authorized for Employees of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority for the Period of January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 and Until Further Order: The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, acting in its capacity as the Governing Body of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority (IHSS PA) RESOLVES THAT: Effective upon adoption and continuing to December 31, 2009, and until further order of the Board, the board adopts the following program of compensation and benefits for the employees of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority. Except for Resolution No. 2002/608 (excluding inconsistent provisions concerning the amount of employee contributions for retirement benefits), this Resolution supersedes all previous resolutions providing compensation and benefits for the employees of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority. Unless expressly provided otherwise, this Resolution is subject to the provisions of the 1937 County Employees Retirement Act. This Resolution does not authorize compensation and benefits for any employee who is represented by an employee organization with a Memorandum of Understanding. Unless otherwise expressly provided, compensation and benefits under this Resolution are authorized only for permanent and project employees of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority who work full-time or part-time, twenty (20) or more hours per week. I. BENEFITS FOR ALL EMPLOYEES OF IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES PUBLIC AUTHORITY (IHSS PA) are provided for those classes listed in Exhibit A. II. BENEFITS ONLY FOR MANAGEMENT AND EXEMPT EMPLOYEES OF IHSS PA are provided for those classes listed in Exhibit A, except for the classes listed in Exhibit B. Contact: Dorothy Sansoe, 335-1009 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Human Resources, County Administrator, County Counsel, Auditor-Controller, In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Donna Wigand), to execute, on behalf of the County, an agreement with the State Department of Mental Health, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $3,668,800, for fiscal years 2008/2009 through 2011-2012, for Contra Costa County’s specific Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Planning Estimate, and to sign an Assignment Agreement to assign Contra Costa County’s PEI Statewide Project Planning Estimate to the California Department of Mental Health (DMH) for the following PEI Statewide Projects: 1) Suicide Prevention; 2) Student Mental Health Initiative; and 3) Stigma and Discrimination Reduction. FISCAL IMPACT: None. These funds in the amount of $3,668,800 will be assigned and allocated to the California Department of Mental Health (DMH) for the three said MHSA PEI Statewide Projects noted above. The Planning Estimates for these Statewide projects are in addition to and (not a part of) the original Planning Estimates provided through Information Notice 07-19 (September 2007) that transmitted the PEI Proposed Guidelines. No County match required. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Donna Wigand (957-5111) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Jacqueline Pigg C.63 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Acceptance of Funds from the State Department of Mental Health for the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Funds BACKGROUND: In November 2004, California voters approved Proposition 63, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) of which was intended to “transform the public mental health system”. The MHSA consist of six components that are being rolled out over time by the State Department of Mental (DMH) with the goal of creating a better program of mental health services and supports in California’s public mental health systems. The six components of MHSA include: Community Planning; Community Services and Supports (CSS); Capital Facilities and Information Technology; Workforce Education and Training (WE&T); Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI); and Innovation. This is a State mandated program under Welfare & Institutions Codes. In January 2007 and September 2007, the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (OAC) approved five PEI Statewide Projects and corresponding funding amounts. These Statewide Projects are also identified in the PEI Proposed Guidelines. In May 2008, the OAC determined that the three PEI Statewide Projects (noted in the recommendations), would be most effectively implemented through a single administrative entity and OAC approved a combined funding level of $40 million each year for four years specifically for these three projects. DMH has agreed to implement these projects upon receiving funds from the Counties and the appropriate state budget authority. For DMH to access funds to implement the PEI Statewide Projects, it is necessary for Counties to assign funds to DMH for these projects. The MHSA Agreement (Provision 10) allows each County to assign funds in its Planning Estimates for the purpose of implementing statewide MHSA programs or projects within that component on behalf of counties, and such assignment will occur through an assignment agreement executed between the County and California State Department of Mental Health. Counties will benefit directly and indirectly from these Statewide Projects through training and technical assistance provided to Counties and their PEI partners, support for the implementation of local PEI Projects, media and social marketing materials in multiple languages, model program sites, enhanced state and local partnerships, coordinated state and local efforts, research and evaluation, and statewide quality improvement activities. Three certified sealed copies of the Board Order should be returned to the Contracts and Grants Unit. ATTACHMENTS SUPPLEMENTAL MHSA PEI STATEWIDE PROJECTS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Contra Costa County 30-Day Public Review and Comment 11/14/2008-12/18 /2008 Page 1 of 5 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Mental Health Services Act Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Supplemental PEI Statewide Projects Assignment Agreement November 14, 2008 SUPPLEMENTAL MHSA PEI STATEWIDE PROJECTS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Contra Costa County 30-Day Public Review and Comment 11/14/2008-12/18 /2008 Page 2 of 5 Introduction The Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) provides funding to expand mental health services in California for children, youth, adults and seniors – with the intent of transforming how mental health care is accessed and delivered using programs proven to be effective. A portion of the MHS A funds have been set aside to provide Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) services. PEI services and programs should be aligned with the transformational concepts inherent in the MHSA: · Community collaboration; · Cultural competency; · Individual/family-driven programs and interventions; · Wellness focus, including concepts of resilience and recovery; and · Integrated services experience for individuals and their families. Contra Costa County Mental Health (CCMH) intends to utilize local and statewide funds as effectively as possible. From our perspective, a statewide approach to certain aspects of prevention is an important component of the overall effort. Broad prevention approaches to suicide prevention, stigma and discrimination and student mental hea lth will connect efforts across counties in California. In order for statewide prevention projects to go forward, counties must assign a portion of PEI funds back to the State for statewide distribution. If the funds are not assigned for statewide use, t hey cannot be used for other local efforts. To assist with local stakeholder understanding of the process and to comply with the requirement, a brief overview of proposed statewide prevention projects and a copy of the assignment agreement letter are available for stakeholder review and comment. The Supplemental PEI Statewide Projects Assignment Agreement is for new PEI funds, and as such is available for 30-day public review and comment in Contra Costa County. We appreciate and thank you for your interest. If you have any questions please call MHSA Program Manager Sherry Bradley at 925-957-5150 or e-mail her at sbradley@hsd.cccounty.us . The assignment agreement will be the topic of a Public Hearing hosted by the Contra Costa County Mental Health Commission on Thursday, December 18, 2008, at 5:00 p.m., in the Board of Supervisors Board Room, located at 651 Pine Street, First Floor, Martinez, CA. Everyone is welcome to attend. Overview The Mental Health Services Act Oversight and Accountability Commission (OAC), the California Mental Health Director’s Association (CMHDA), and the California State Department of Mental Health (DMH) have been working collaboratively to develop a method of implementation for statewide prevention projects. In 2007, the OAC approved five PEI SUPPLEMENTAL MHSA PEI STATEWIDE PROJECTS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Contra Costa County 30-Day Public Review and Comment 11/14/2008-12/18 /2008 Page 3 of 5 Statewide Projects that including funding for each project. If you wish, you may access the statewide projects that are identified in the PEI proposed plan guidelines on the DMH website (http://www.dmh.ca.gov/Prop_63/MHSA/default.asp). In 2008, the OAC determined that three statewide projects would be most effectively implemented through a single administrative entity, and that a combined funding level each year for four years would be used specifically for these three projects. Beginning below is a broad description of the three statewide projects: Suicide Prevention – Intended to significantly impact information about suicide prevention by: · Building a system of suicide prevention at both state and local levels; · Providing training, technical assistance, resources and other needed supports to help counties successfully develop and implement suicide prevention activities; · Increasing the capacity and quality of local suicide prevention hotlines; and · Increasing the capacity of the workforces to effectively prevent suicides. Student Mental Health Initiative – Intended to provide grants to educational institutions for: · Campus -based mental health programs; · Systems and policy development that integrates a comprehensive system of campus-based supports; and · Trainings for campus -based staff, County Mental Health staff, other direct providers and educators, and peers and family to raise awareness of mental health and wellness on campuses in order to build capacity for effective early inter vention programs. Stigma and Discrimination Reduction – Intended to develop a strategic plan to reduce stigma and discrimination against people living with mental illness. Goals for this project include: · Reduce stigma experienced by individuals who have a mental illness, or have a social, emotional or behavioral issue; · Reduce stigma experienced by parents or caregivers of children, youth and other family members with mental illness, or who have a social, emotional or behavioral issue; · Reduce stigma assoc iated with seeking services and supports for mental health issues; · Reduce discrimination against individuals living with mental illness, or who have social, emotional or behavioral issues; · Support and complement county-level interventions that address stigma and discrimination. The DMH has agreed to implement these projects upon receiving funds form the counties and the appropriate state budget authority. For DMH to access funds to implement the PEI statewide projects, it is necessary for counties to assign funds to DMH for these projects, These PEI SUPPLEMENTAL MHSA PEI STATEWIDE PROJECTS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Contra Costa County 30-Day Public Review and Comment 11/14/2008-12/18 /2008 Page 4 of 5 statewide projects have been and will continue to be deve loped and implemented with involvement of County Mental Health Directors and staff, CMHDA, OAC staff and other diverse stakeholders throughout California. Once the funds are assigned to DMH, steps toward implementation may begin. Counties throughout the state are conducting their own planning process for local PEI plan development and their own local PEI projects and will benefit directly and indirectly from these statewide projects through training and technical assistance, support for the implementation of local PEI projects, media and social marketing in multiple languages, model program sites, enhancement of state and local efforts, research and evaluation, and statewide quality improvement activities. Local Community Planning Process: In Contra Costa County, the community planning process began in February 2008 will continue through the proposed plan submission in early 2009. In collaboration with key community partners, general stakeholder meetings were conducted over a period of months, beginning on March 30, 2008, and concluding with the last PEI Stakeholder meeting held November 6, 2008. Many diverse community members participated by attending stakeholder meetings and/or submitting completed surveys. The local stakeholder process is intended to engage community members to give input concerning certain Key Community Needs and Priority Populations identified in the PEI Plan Guidelines issued by the DMH. Stakeholder input is also included in the analysis, selection and prioritization process that will determine where Contra Costa County will begin its PEI programming efforts. Collaboration and leveraging of existing resources is encouraged in the PEI Plan Guidelines. (For further information, see http://www.dmh.ca.gov/Prop_63/MHSA/Prevention_and_Early_Intervention/default.asp). Key Community Mental Health Needs: · Disparities in access to mental health services · Psycho -social impact of trauma · At-risk c hildren, youth and adult populations · Stigma and discrimination · Suicide risk Priority Populations: · Underserved cultural populations of all ages · Individuals of all ages experiencing onset of serious psychiatric illness · Trauma-exposed people of all ages · Children/Youth o In stressed families o At-risk for school failure o At-risk of or experiencing juvenile justice involvement SUPPLEMENTAL MHSA PEI STATEWIDE PROJECTS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Contra Costa County 30-Day Public Review and Comment 11/14/2008-12/18 /2008 Page 5 of 5 Key Community Partners for Planning and Implementation of Local PEI Funds: · Consumers & Family Members · Representatives from Underserved Communities (Native American, African American, Latino, Asian/Pacific Island, LGBT) · Social Service (CPS, APS, EHSD, Senior Services, Community Based Orgs) · Education (Primary, Secondary, 2 post-secondary) · Health Community (Public Health, Primary Care/Physical Health Care, Clinic Consortium) · MH Providers (Contractors & County Staff) · Faith Based Community Representatives · Law Enforcement (County Sheriff, Local City Jurisdictions, Courts, Probation Dept) · Contra Costa Mental Health Commission Enclosure 3 SUPPLEMENTAL MHSA PEI STATEWIDE PROJECTS ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Contra Costa County Contra Costa County agrees to participate in the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Statewide Projects funded from the PEI Component of the MHSA Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan. The MHSA PEI Statewide Projects will be administered by the Department of Mental Health 0DMH) in collaboration with the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (OAC) and the California Mental Health Directors Association (CMHDA). Contra Costa Co unty agrees that upon its approval of this Assignment, in addition to any funds previously assigned, the following amounts will be transferred to DMH concurrent with the start of the State Fiscal Year (SFY) from which they are assigned subject to the effective conditions specified below: $917,200 of the County’s SFY 08/09 PEI Statewide Project Planning Estimate $917,200 of the County’s SFY 09/10 PEI Statewide Project Planning Estimate $917,200 of the County’s SFY 10/11 PEI Statewide Project Planning Estimate $917,200 of the County’s SFY 11/12 PEI Statewide Project Planning Estimate Specifically, funds in the amount specified will be transferred from the Mental Health Services Fund Local Assistance portion of the DMH state budget, item 4440-001-3085, to the State Operations portion of the DMH state budget, item 4401-001-3085, Program 10, State Operations. DMH will use these funds to administer three PEI Statewide Projects: Suicide Prevention, Student Mental Health Initiative, and Stigma and Discrimination Reduction. Assignment shall be effective only upon: · Approval by DMH; · A fully-executed County MHSA Agreement with DMH; and · Appropriation of sufficient funds in the State Budget Act to fund the PEI Statewide Projects outlined above. Approved for County (by signature) To be signed following 30 day review/hearing Date: Printed Name and Title: Donna M. Wigand, LCSW, Mental Health Director Contra Costa County Mental Health Division 1340 Arnold Drive, Ste. 200 s Martinez, CA 94553 (925) 957-5150 s Fax (925) 957-5156 www.cche alth.org/services/mentalhealth/prop63/pei_planning.php MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES ACT (MHSA) / PROP. 63 MHSA PEI Assignment Agreement for the Supplemental PEI Standards Projects – 2008 30-day Public Comment Form November 14, 2008-December 18, 2008 PERSONAL INFORMATION (Optional) Name: _______________________________________________________________________________ Agency/Organization: __________________________________________________________________ Phone Number: (_____) __________________ E-mail: _______________________________________ Mailing Address: ______________________________________________________________________ City: _____________________________________________________ Zip: _______________________ MY ROLE IN THE MENTAL HEALTH COMMUNITY ___ Client/Consumer ___ Family Member ___ Education ___ Social Services ___ Service Provider ___ Law Enforcement/ Criminal Justice ___ Probation ___ Other (specify): ___________________________ WHAT DO YOU SEE AS THE STRENGTHS OF THE PROPOSED AGREEMENT? PLEASE EXPLAIN ANY CONCERNS YOU HAVE ABOUT THE AGREEMENT. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Wendel Brunner, M.D.), to accept on behalf of the County, Grant Award #28-692-2 (#20081186) for the California Endowment, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $225,000, for the Community Action to fight Asthma/Contra Costa Asthma Coalition Project, for the period July 1, 2008 through February 28, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this Grant Award will result in an amount not to exceed $225,000 in funding from the California Endowment for the Department’ Community Action to fight Asthma/Contra Costa Asthma Coalition Project. No County funds required. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa Asthma Coalition Project will address the higher than average rate of asthma in children throughout Contra Costa County. This project interfaces with several other County Programs, such as the County’s Health Plan and Public Health Clinics that provide case management services to child asthmatics. One key priority of the California Endowment’s APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Wendel Brunner, M.D. (313-6712) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Jacqueline Pigg, Barbara Borbon C.58 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Acceptance of Grant Award #28-692-2 from the California Endowment BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Asthma Initiatives is to effectively collaborate with existing programs and projects in order to maximize the County’s ability to reduce the negative impact of asthma on children in Contra Costa. Approval of Grant Award #28-692-2 will allow funding to the Department for the coalition to continue to meet its objectives of educating and organizing West County residents about asthma and air pollution issues, and how to advocate for policy changes that will reduce environmental triggers for asthma through February 28, 2010. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Wendel Brunner, MD) to execute on behalf of the County, Agreement (Amendment) #28-528-36 with the County of Alameda, effective March 1, 2008, to amend Agreement #28-528-34 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #28-528-35), to increase the total payment limit payable to County by $21,796 from $1,225,000 to a new total of $1,246,796 and to make technical adjustments to the agreement with no change in the original term of March 1, 2008 through February 28, 2009. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement will result in an increase in the amount of funding by $21,796 to a new payment limit of $1,246,796, from the County of Alameda, as the Grantee of federal funds under the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act of 2006, Part A. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has designated the County of Alameda as “Grantee” for the purpose of administering the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Wendel Brunner, M.D. (313-6712) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Jacqueline Pigg, Barbara Borbon C.57 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement (Amendment) #28-528-36 with the County of Alameda BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Modernization Act of 2006, Part A funds for coordination of essential services to County Costa County residence with HIV disease and their families. On June 3, 2008, the Board of Supervisors approved Agreement #28-528-34 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #28-528-35) with the County of Alameda, as the Grantee of Federal Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act of 2006, Part A funds, for the period from March 1, 2008 through February 28, 2009, for coordination of essential services to County Costa County residence with HIV disease and their families. Approval of this Agreement (Amendment) #28-528-36 will increase payment to the County, in amount not to exceed $21,796 for these services, make technical adjustments, and allow services to continue through February 28, 2009. Four sealed/certified copies of this Board Order should be returned to the Contracts and Grants Unit for submission to the County of Alameda. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the General Services Director, or designee, to execute a Transportation Fund for Clean Air (TFCA) funding agreement with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District in the amount of $70,000 from March 1, 2009 through February 28, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: The TFCA grant application is for $70,000 to install Particulate Matter (PM) traps on four diesel prisoner transport buses operated by the County. The total project cost is $80,800 and the County match is $10,800. The County match will be paid through Sheriff funds. BACKGROUND: The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) administers the Transportation Fund for the Clean Air Program, whereby local governments and other organizations may apply for grant funding to assist financing clean air projects. One of the project areas available for funding under the TFCA program is the retrofitting APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Mike Lango (925) 313-7120 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Madlin King, Becky Eaton - Accounting, Barbara Riveira - CAO, Terry Mann - Fleet C.56 To:Board of Supervisors From:Michael J. Lango, General Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE FUNDING AGREEMENT FOR TRANSPORTATION FUND CLEAN AIR GRANT BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of existing diesel powered vehicle exhaust systems with PM traps in order to reduce exhaust emissions. The proposed project is intended to install PM traps on four of the five County prisoner transport buses, which travel daily throughout the County. The PM traps will reduce particulate matter emissions from these vehicles by 85% and Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) emissions by 25%. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the funding agreement is not approved, the County would have to pay an additional $70,000 to install mandated PM traps on the four diesel buses. ATTACHMENTS TFCA Funding Agreement 08R29 TFCA Funding Approval RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment & Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the California Department of Education to increase the payment limit by $4,735 for a new payment limit not to exceed $296,045, for full-day Pre-Kindergarten Family Literacy program services with no change to the term July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. FISCAL IMPACT: No County costs. 100% State funding BACKGROUND: On August 12, 2008 the Board of Supervisors accepted funding from the California Department of Education to fund Pre-Kindergarten Family Literacy programs in Contra Costa County. This amendment is to restore funds not included in the original contract due to state budget constraints at the time. Approval of this amendment will allow for continued program services to program eligible children and families. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: C. Youngblood, 313-1712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Cassandra Youngblood, Ressie Dayco C.53 To:Board of Supervisors From:Joe Valentine, Employment & Human Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:CA CDE CPKF Pre-K Literacy Contract Amendment 1 CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Community Services Bureau of the Employment & Human Services Department's Head Start and Child Development programs supports three of Contra Costa County's community outcomes. Outcome 1: "Children Ready for Succeeding in School," Outcome 3: "Families that are Economically Self-sufficient," and, Outcome 4: "Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing." These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Sherman Quinlan) to accept on behalf of the County, Grant Award Agreement #28-511-18 from the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB, EA19-08-15), to pay County an amount not to exceed $25,830, for the continuation of the Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) assistance funds for the Department's Environmental Health Division (Solid Waste Program), for the period July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, including agreeing to indemnify and hold harmless the Grantor from any claims arising out of the performance of this Agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this agreement will result in $25,830 of funding from the California Integrated Waste Management Board for the Department's Solid Waste Program. No County funds are required. BACKGROUND: The California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) is accepting applications for the Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) Grant Program for the period from July 1, 2008 through APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sherman Quinlan (692-2521) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Jacqueline Pigg, Barbara Borbon C.59 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Agreement #28-511-18 from the California Integrated Waste Management Board BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) June 30, 2009. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 43230, this grant award will be used solely for the support of the solid waste facilities permit and inspection programs. These funds will supplement the Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) existing budget for equipment, training, supplies, personnel, and technical support. On June 3, 2008, the Board of Supervisors approved submission of funding application #28-511-17 with the California Integrated Waste Management Board for the Department's Environmental Health Division (Solid Waste Program), for the period July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. Approval of this Grant Agreement #28-511-18 will allow the Department continuous Local Enforcement Agency (LEA) assistance funding to continue the Solid Waste Program through June, 30, 2009. Three certified and sealed copies of the Board Order authorizing submission of the application should be returned to the Contracts and Grants Unit. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Jeff Smith, M.D.) to accept on behalf of the County Grant Award #29-677 (08-1057) from the California Healthcare Foundation, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $40,000 for the Enabling Chronic Disease Registries Project, a Multi-Condition Chronic Disease Management System (CDMS), for the period from May 1, 2008 through February 28, 2009. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this Award will result in $40,000 from the California Healthcare Foundation for the County’s Regional Medical Center Enabling Chronic Disease Registries Project, a Multi-Condition Chronic Disease Management System (CDMS). No County funds are required. BACKGROUND: Fourteen million Californians have at least one chronic condition, while seven million have two or more conditions and yet direct health care accounts for more than 75 percent of total health care expenditures. Despite a wealth of scientific evidence and the availability APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jeff Smith, M.D. (370-5113) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Jacqueline Pigg, Barbara Borbon C.61 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Award #29-677 from the California Healthcare Foundation BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of information about best practices in chronic disease care, many patients do not receive the care and support they need to effectively manage their conditions. Funding for this Enabling Chronic Disease Registries Project, a Multi-Condition Chronic Disease Management System (CDMS), will allow the County’s Regional Medical Center to purchase this chronic disease management system with the proper functionality to accelerate the spread of chronic disease improvement work throughout Contra Costa County. The goal of the project will be to improve health outcomes and assist in the reduction of health disparities, while having the ability to track and monitor the care of patients with chronic conditions over time, identify those with gaps in care and reach out to bring them in for needed tests or treatment, and to provide clinicians with timely and accurate information about what is needed at the time of a patient visit. Approval of Grant Award #29-677 will provide funding to expand the chronic disease registry functionality and implementation of a new chronic disease management system (CDMS) at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center through, February 28, 2009. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Wendel Brunner, M.D.), to execute on behalf of the County, Interagency Agreement #28-725-4 with Lafayette School District, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $1,600, for the Public Health Department’s Scoliosis Screening Project for 7th and 8th grade students for the period from February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this Interagency Agreement will allow Lafayette School District to pay County $1,600 to support the Public Health Department’s Scoliosis Screening Project, through January 31, 2010. BACKGROUND: Lafayette School District has requested that Contra Costa County Health Services, Public Health Division, provide Scoliosis Screening Clinics at the Stanley Intermediate School for their 7th grade girls and 8th grade boys, throughout the school year. By providing an outreach program such as the scoliosis screening of their students, the School District is able to provide APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Wendel Brunner, M.D., 313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Barbara Borbon, HS Contract & Grants, Detra Morgan, HS Contracts & Grants C.54 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Interagency Agreement #28-725-4 with Lafayette School District BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) a valuable diagnostic and preventative service to their students who might otherwise go untreated. On January 15, 2008, the Board of Supervisors approved Interagency Agreement #28-725-3 with Lafayette School District, for the period from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008. Approval of Interagency Agreeement #28-725-4 will allow the County to continue to provide scoliosis screening services to Lafayette School District students, through Janaury 31, 2010. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Librarian, or designee, to partner with the City of Lafayette to accept a grant in the amount of $50,350 from the International City Management Association (ICMA) to provide technology and resources for emergency preparedness education and response in the new Lafayette Library and Learning Center (LLLC). (no matching funds required) FISCAL IMPACT: No matching funds are required. BACKGROUND: The Lafayette Library and Learning Center is scheduled to open in late Fall 2009. The City's new Emergency Operation Center (EOC) will be located in the new library. The partnership formed through this grant will expand the City's capabilities to respond to local and regional emergencies and will provide opportunities for the library to present emergency readiness education and training to residents, organizations and businesses. Specifically, the Contra Costa County Library will: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anne Cain (925) 927-3201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson , Deputy cc: C.48 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anne Cain, Librarian Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Public Library Innovation Grant BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) • Form a new partnership with the City of Lafayette to take an active role in emergency preparedness • Assist the EOC in providing critical information to the community before, during and after a disaster • Provide training programs and other educational opportunities to the community in emergency readiness and response • Offer collections in multiple formats in a variety of emergency related topics • Work with the City and the EOC to provide Web services that provide information and services prior to and during an emergency • Work with the business community and neighborhood groups to provide information on workplace and neighborhood safety and response • Use disaster anniversaries as educational opportunities • Use existing and develop additional outreach opportunities and assistive technology to ensure that vital emergency information reaches the community’s most vulnerable residents • Participate in the development of a community network to provide essential services during and after an emergency • Work with the City to create and maintain a registry of emergency community volunteers RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Jeff Smith, M.D.) to accept notice of Grant Award from the California Health Care Safety Net Institute, to pay the County an amount not to exceed 200,000 for the Safe and Efficient Electronic Prescribing Practices for the Underserved and Uninsured in California Public Hospital Clinics Project for the period from October 15, 2008 through January 31, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of this Award will result in $200,000 from the California Health Care Safety Net Institute, for the Safe and Efficient Electronic Prescribing Practices for the Underserved and Uninsured in California Public Hospital Clinics Project at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center. No County funds are required. BACKGROUND: The California Health Care Safety Net Institute (SNI) has designed a program to promote safe and efficient electronic prescribing practices for the underserve and uninsured in California Public Hospital Clinics (CAPH). E-prescribing demonstrates proven workflow efficiencies, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jeff Smith, M.D. (370-5113) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Jacqueline Pigg, Barbara Borbon C.60 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Notice of Grant Award #29-676 from the California Health Care Safety Net Institute BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) reduce human error by streamlining the communications process between providers and pharmacies, thereby greatly reducing prescription errors, and improving the quality and safety of patient care of medication history information. SNI will provide funds to Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) to reduce cost by enabling formulary data, complete patient information and clinical advice at the point of care. The goal of phase I of E-prescribing will be to move CCRMC’s prescriptions from manual to electronically digitally signing, with the ability to fax prescriptions to CCRMC’s inpatient pharmacy and CCRMC’s external pharmacy. This process is currently partially automated and partially manual at this point. Acceptance of Grant Award #29-676 will pay for a software link to fully automate the E-prescribing process, thus reducing potential for patient medication errors, and providing a better quality of care, through January 31, 2010. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Wendel Brunner, M.D.), to execute on behalf of the County, Standard Agreement (Amendment) #29-250-47 with the California Department of Health Services, Office of Oral Health, effective July 1, 2008, to amend Standard Agreement #29-250-46, to decrease the payment limit by $37,182 from $557,715 to a new total payment limit of $520,533, and to make technical adjustments to the scope of work for the Children’s Dental Disease Prevention Program, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010 FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this Standard Agreement (Amendment) will result in a decrease of $37,182 of State funding for the Dental Disease Prevention Program, for Fiscal Years 2008/2009 and 2009/2010. No County match is required BACKGROUND: The Dental Disease Prevention Program is a State-mandated program, designed to prevent and control dental disease found in children at selected school districts, and to provide APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Wendel Brunner, M.D., 313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Barbara Borbon C.55 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Standard Agreement (Amendment) #29-250-47 with the California Department of Health Services , Office of Oral Health BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) a comprehensive community-supported and school-based dental disease prevention program. The program serves approximately 21,156 children in elementary schools and preschool sites in Contra Costa County. On June 26, 2007, the Board of Supervisors approved Standard Agreement #29-250-46 with the State Department of Health Services for the Dental Disease Prevention Program, for the period from July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010. Approval of Standard Agreement (Amendment) #29-250-47 will decrease funding to the Dental Disease Prevention Program and make technical adjustments to the scope of work, allowing the County to continue to provide services, through June 30, 2010. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director or his designee (Haven Fearn) to execute, on behalf of the County, Standard Agreement (Amendment) #29-502-24 (07-NNA07, 01), with the State Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, effective July 1, 2008 to amend Standard Agreement #29-502-22 (as amended by Standard Agreement Amendment #29-502-23), to reflect an increase by the State, Federal Block Grant and Federal Drug Medi-Cal funding, in an amount not to exceed $93,833, for fiscal year 2008-2009, with a new payment limit of $11,608,332, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this (Amendment) agreement will increase the funds for fiscal year 2008-2009 by $93,833 from the State, Federal and Federal Drug Medi-Cal as follows: FY 2007-08 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Haven Fearn 313-6350 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson , Deputy cc: Jacqueline Pigg, Barbara Borbon C.47 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Standard Agreement (Amendment) #29-502-24 with the State of California, Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs FISCAL IMPACT: (CONT'D) As Amended Net Change State General Funds $2,989,235 $ 3,009,819 $20,584 Federal Block Grants 6,438,596 6,441,684 3,088 Federal Drug/Med-Cal 2,086,668 2,156,829 70,161 TOTAL $11,514,499 $11,608,332 $93,833 No change in the required County match for this Agreement. Funding for this Contract is included in the Department’s fiscal year 2008-09 budget, of this three year Agreement. Based on current Medical claiming levels, no budgetary impact is expected from this amendment BACKGROUND: This Standard Agreement #29-502 is a combined Negotiated Net Amount (NNA) and Drug/Medi-Cal contract. The NNA Agreement (effective July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010) requires counties to provide Drug/Medi-Cal services up to their full State General Fund allocation for Drug/Medi-Cal match. If the required services exceed the allocation, counties may access a Drug/Medi-Cal reserve set aside for this purpose. On May 6, 2008, the Board of Supervisors approved Standard Agreement #29-502-22 (as amended by Standard Amendment Agreement #29-502-23), with the State Department of Alcohol & Drug Programs, for the period from July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2010, to provide Substance Abuse services. This amendment Agreement reflects the anticipated FY 2008-2009 funding allocation and makes technical adjustments to the exhibits. Approval of this Standard Agreement (Amendment) #29-502-24 will result in an increase in the State Medi-Cal and Federal Medi-Cal match and allow continuation of the Substance Abuse services, Prevention and Treatment Program, through June 30, 2010. Three sealed and certified copies of this Board Order should be returned to the Contracts and Grants Unit for submission to the State. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Patricia Tanquary) to execute on behalf of the County, Standard Agreement (Amendment) #29-782-9 (State #05MHF046, A5) with the State of California, Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board, to amend Standard Agreement #29-782-2 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #29-782-3 through #29-782-7), effective December 31, 2008, to increase the amount payable to County by $1,161, from $4,987, to a new total payment of $6,148, for the Healthy Families Program, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2005 through January 31, 2009. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this Standard Agreement (Amendment) will result in an increase of $1,161 of State funding for Healthy Families Program services not approved for Federal funding. No County funds are required. BACKGROUND: On July 25, 2005, the Board of Supervisors approved Standard Agreement #29-782-2 (as amended by Amendment Agreements #29-782-3 through #29-782-7) with the State of California, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Tanquary (313-6004) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Jacqueline Pigg, Barbara Borbon C.62 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Standard Agreement (Amendment) #29-782-9 with the State of California, Managed BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board for the period from July 1, 2005 through January 31, 2009, for County’s participation in the Healthy Families Program. Approval of Standard Agreement (Amendment) #29-782-9 continues State funding for County’s Contra Costa Health Plan-Community Plan participation for State supported services in the Healthy Families Program through January 31, 2009. Five sealed/certified copies of this Board Order should be returned to the Contracts and Grants Unit for submission to the State. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner or his designee, to sign agreement 08-0695 with the Department of Food and Agriculture that will reimburse the County up to $1,013,056 for County costs for providing pest detection services from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract provides reimbursement for County expense incurred during this period for pest detection work performed on behalf of the California Department of Food and Agriculture in Contra Costa County. BACKGROUND: The County Department of Agriculture deploys traps countywide to detect incipient infestations of exotic pests such as Medfly, Gypsy Moth, Japanese Beetle, etc. The State reimburses the county for all costs that exceed our historic level of trapping. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cathy Roybal 925-646-5250 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: , County Administrator C.49 To:Board of Supervisors From:Vincent L. Guise, Director of Agriculture/Weights & Measures Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:State Pest Detection Contract RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of the Department of Conservation and Development or her designee to approve and execute the 2008/09 Housing Rehabilitation Services Agreement between the City of Antioch and Contra Costa County for the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program. FISCAL IMPACT: None. All costs to be reimbursed by City of Antioch. BACKGROUND: In fiscal year 2007-08, 10 loans were executed on behalf of City of Antioch for a total of $497,414. For fiscal year 2008-09, the City of Antioch has approved and authorized the expenditure of Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000) total from Antioch Development Agency funds for a housing rehabilitation program for owner-occupants of single-family homes. The County has the demonstrated experience and qualifications to operate a housing APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925-335-1115 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: C.51 To:Board of Supervisors From:Catherine Kutsuris, Conservation & Development Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:THE 2008/09 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND THE CITY OF ANTIOCH FOR THE HOUSING REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) rehabilitation program under the Antioch Development Agency Program. This is the twenty-first year the County has contracted with the City of Antioch for these services. The Agreement will result in $108,000 in revenue to the County for costs related to the implementation of the Program. The term of the agreement is July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of the Department of Conservation and Development or her designee to approve and execute the 2008/09 Housing Rehabilitation Services Agreement with the City of Walnut Creek and Contra Costa County for the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program. FISCAL IMPACT: None. All costs to be reimbursed by City of Walnut Creek. BACKGROUND: A. In fiscal year 2003-04 the Department began contracting with the City of Walnut Creek to administer their home rehabilitation program. In fiscal year 2004-05, six loans were executed on behalf of City of Walnut Creek for a total of $321,500. B. In fiscal year 2005-06, four loans were executed on behalf of City of Walnut Creek for a total of $321,500. In fiscal year 2006-07 four loans were executed for a total of $176,000. C. In APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925-335-1115 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: C.52 To:Board of Supervisors From:Catherine Kutsuris, Conservation & Development Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:THE 2008/09 AGREEMENT BETWEEN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND THE CITY OF WALNUT CREEK FOR THE HOUSING REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) fiscal year 2007-08, seven loans were executed on behalf of City of Walnut Creek for a total of $254,559. D. For Fiscal Year 2008-09, the City of Walnut Creek has approved and authorized the expenditure of Two Hundred Sixty One Thousand Dollars $261,000 in Redevelopment funds for a housing rehabilitation program for owner-occupants of single-family homes. E. County has the demonstrated experience and qualifications to operate a housing rehabilitation program. F. This is the sixth year the County will contract with the City of Walnut Creek for these services. The Agreement will result in $46,980 in revenue to the County for costs related to the implementation of the Program. G. The term of the agreement is July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Wendel Brunner, M.D.) to execute on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement #22-137-40 with Meals on Wheels\Family and Community Services of Contra Costa (dba Senior Outreach Services), a non-profit corporation, effective March 1, 2009, to amend Novation Contract #22-137-39, to increase the payment limit by $19,285, from $273,172 to a new payment limit of $292,457, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, and no change in the automatic extension through September 30, 2009 in an amount not to exceed $68,293. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is 100% federally funded under Title III-C (2) of the Older Americans Act of 1965. No County funding is required. BACKGROUND: On August 12, 2008 the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #22-137-39 with Meals on Wheels\Family and Community Services of Contra Costa (dba Senior Outreach Services) for the period from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, which included an automatic extension APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Wendel Brunner, MD 313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Larry Smith, Barbara Borbon C.81 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #22-137-40 with Meals on Wheels\Family and Community Services of Contra Costa BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) through September 30, 2009, for the provision of home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #22-137-40 will allow the Contractor to provide additional meals, through June 30, 2009. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Donna Wigand), to execute on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement #74–188–8 with Youth Homes Incorporated, a non-profit corporation, effective February 1, 2009, to amend Novation Contract #74-188-7, to increase the payment limit by $300,000, from $950,000 to a new payment limit of $1,250,000, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, and to increase the automatic extension payment limit by $150,000, from $475,000 to a new payment limit of $625,000. FISCAL IMPACT: 50% by Federal FFP Medi-Cal, 45% by State Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT), and 5% by Mental Health Realignment. BACKGROUND: On December 16, 2008, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #74-188-7 with Youth Homes Incorporated, for the period from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, for the provision of therapeutic behavioral services to County referred clients, ages 0-21 years of APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Donna Wigand 957-5111 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Barbara Borbon, Larry Smith C.66 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #74-188-8 with Youth Homes Incorporated BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) age. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #74-188-8 will allow the Contractor to provide services to additional clients, through June 30, 2009. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Donna Wigand) to execute on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #74–220–6 with Seneca Residential and Day Treatment Center for Children, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $2,035,047, to provide school and community based mental health services for seriously emotionally disturbed students in the Mt. Diablo Unified School District, for the period from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. This Contract includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2009, in an amount not to exceed $1,017,523. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 25% by Federal FFP Medi-Cal, 24% by State Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT), 25% by Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA/SB 90), and 26% by the Mount Diablo Unified School District. BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population in that it provides school and community based mental health services, including assessments; individual, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Donna Wigand 957-5111 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Barbara Borbon, Larry Smith C.79 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #74-220-6 with Seneca Residential and Day Treatment Center for Children BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) group and family therapy; medication support; case management; outreach; and crisis intervention services for Seriously Emotionally Disturbed (SED) high school aged children and their families. On January 9, 2008, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #74 220 4 (as amended by Contract Amendment Agreement #74 220 5) with Seneca Residential and Day Treatment Center for Children, for the period from July 1, 2007 through June 30, 2008, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2008, to provide school and community based mental health services for Seriously Emotionally Disturbed students in the Mt. Diablo Unified School District and their families. Approval of Novation Contract #74 220 6 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows the Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2009. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This school-based collaborative program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner to execute a contract with Michael G. Ross in an amount not to exceed $87,000 to provide administrative consulting services for the period January 1 throught December 31, 2009. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% County General Fund; Budgeted, Office of the Sheriff. BACKGROUND: Mr. Ross provides administrative services and consultation to the Sheriff regarding budget strategy and monitoring; training and staff development; and labor negotiation strategies and processes. The contract includes the mutual indemnification of Contra Costa County and Michael G. Ross and has been reviewed and approved as to form by County Counsel. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: E.Devlin 925-335-1557 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: K. Todd, B. Kilian, E, Devlin C.89 To:Board of Supervisors From:Warren Rupf, Sheriff-Coroner Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Administration Consultant Services RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Jeff Smith, M.D.) to execute on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement #26-971-10 with Ramon Berguer, M.D., Inc., a self-employed individual, effective September 1, 2008, to amend Contract #26-971-8 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #26-971-9), to modify the payment provisions to add education expense reimbursement, with no change to the original payment limit of $910,000 and no change in the original term from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2009. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funded by Enterprise Fund I. Cost to the County depends upon utilization. As appropriate, patients and/or third party payors will be billed or services. BACKGROUND: On January 9, 2007, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-971-8 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #26-971-9) with Ramon Berguer, M.D., for the period from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2009, for the provision of General Surgery services including consultation, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jeff Smith, M.D. (370-5113) I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Barbara Borbon C.64 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment Agreement #26-971-10 with Ramon Berguer, M.D. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) training, surgery, on-call and clinical coverage for patients at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Contra Costa Health Centers. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #26-971-10, will allow the Contractor to receive reimbursement for continuing education expenses as the Chief of General Surgery at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers as agreed upon the parties, through December 31, 2009. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Pat Godley) to execute on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement #23-336-7 with Toyon Associates, Inc., a corporation, effective January 1, 2009, to amend Contract #23-336-6, to increase the payment limit by $40,000, from $750,000 to a new payment limit of $790,000 and to extend the term from June 30, 2009 through June 30, 2011. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is included in the Health Services Department's Enterprise Fund I Budget. This Contract is a contingent fee contract. Contractor will be paid a commission based on Medicare recoveries. BACKGROUND: On August 5, 2008, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-336-6 with Toyon Associates, Inc., for the period from through July 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009, for the provision of consultation and technical assistance with regard to conducting reviews of the Medicare ratios to assess the maximum disproportionate share calculation to which Contra Costa Regional Medical APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 957-5405 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Barbara Borbon C.82 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment Agreement #23-336-7 with Toyon Associates, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Center is entitled. This contract covers services to be provided for several different cost report years up to and including Fiscal Year 2006-2007. The Contractor will review and pursue as appropriate additional reimbursement for each fiscal year individually. The appeals being put forward are by the very nature, extremely aggressive in seeking the maximum amount of additional reimbursement possible on behalf of Contra Costa Regional Medical Center. In all likelihood, the actual amount of the recoveries will be significantly less than the amounts claimed. This contract payment limit is an estimate of the amount of commission that the Contractor could earn if they were to prevail at the full aggressive filing levels. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #23-336-7 will allow the Contractor to provide additional consultation and technical assistance with regard to Medicare Prospective Payment System appeals, through June 30, 2011. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Jeff Smith, M.D.), to execute on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement #26-260-17 with Preferred Staffing, Inc., a corporation, effective July 1, 2008, to amend Contract #26-260-15, to increase the payment limit by $6,623, from $50,000 to a new payment limit of $56,623 with no change in the original term of August 1, 2007 through July 31, 2008. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: On August 14, 2007, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-260-15 with Preferred Staffing, Inc., for the period from August 1, 2007 through July 31, 2008, for the provision of nursing registry services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Contra Costa Health Centers. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #26-260-17 will allow the Contractor to be paid for registry nursing services rendered APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jeff Smith, M.D., 370-5113 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Barbara Borbon C.84 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment Agreement #26-260-17 with Preferred Staffing, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) to cover for temporary absences and vacant positions at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, through July 31, 2008. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Jeff Smith, M.D.), to execute on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement #26-560-1 with Amy E. Baba, DPM, a self-employed individual, effective January 1, 2009, to amend Contract #26-560, to increase the payment limit by $11,000, from $195,000 to a new payment limit of $206,000, with no change in the original term of March 1, 2006 through February 28, 2009. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: On March 14, 2006, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-560 with Amy E. Baba, DPM, for the period from March 1, 2006 through February 28, 2009, for the provision of podiatry services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Contra Costa Health Centers. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #26-560-1 will allow the Contractor to provide additional podiatry services due to an increase in APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jeff Smith, M.D., 370-5113 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Barbara Borbon C.83 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment Agreement #26-560-1with Amy E. Baba, DPM BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) patient volume at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, through February 28, 2009. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Donna Wigand), to execute on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement #74-185-8 with Windrix Transcription, Inc., a corporation, effective January 1, 2009, to amend Contract #74-185-7, to increase the payment limit by $90,000, from $75,000 to a new payment limit of $165,000, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Mental Health Realignment Funds. BACKGROUND: In July 2008 the County Administrator approved and Purchasing Service Manager executed Contract #74-185-7 with Windrix Transcription, Inc., for the period from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009, for the provision of medical transcription services for Mental Health Divisions Outpatient Psychiatric services. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #74-185-8 will allow the Contractor to provide additional APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Donna Wigand, 957-5111 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Barbara Borbon C.72 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment Agreement #74-185-8 with Windrix Transcription, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) medical transcription services due to an increase in utilization, through June 30, 2009. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Donna Wigand) to execute on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement #74-271-82(1) with Lori Salinas, MFT, a self-employed individual, effective February 1, 2009, to amend Contract #74 271-82, to increase the payment limit by $44,000, from $36,000 to a new payment limit of $80,000, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% Medi-Cal Funds, offset 50% State and 50% Federal. BACKGROUND: In June 2008, the County Administrator approved and the Purchasing Services Manager executed Contract #74 271-82 with Lori Salinas, MFT, for the period from July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2010, to provide Medi-Cal mental health specialty services. At the time of negotiations, the payment limit was based on target levels of utilization. However, the utilization during the term of the agreement was higher APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Donna Wigand 957-5111 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Demetria Gary, Barbara Borbon C.75 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment Agreement #74-271-82(1) with Lori Salinas, MFT BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) than originally anticipated. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #74 271-82(1) will allow the Contractor to provide additional services through June 30, 2010. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Department of Conservation and Development Director, or her designee, to execute a contract amendment with Environmental Science Associates to extend the term from March 1, 2009 to November 1, 2009, with no change to the payment limit of $284,659.00, for providing continual services on the Bayview Residential Project Environmental Impact Report, and to inform the contractor that effective May 8, 2008 the Community Development Department is now the Department of Conservation and Development. (District II) (Contract #C49787) (Amendment #1) FISCAL IMPACT: None. The cost is covered by revenue received from applicant, Discovery Builders Inc. BACKGROUND: To assist staff in preparation of an Environmental Impact Report, the County entered into a contract with Environmental Science Associates an environmental consultant. The APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ryan Hernandez, 3351206 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: C.74 To:Board of Supervisors From:Catherine Kutsuris, Conservation & Development Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment with Environmental Science Associates BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) project is not yet complete, and there is a continuing need for services by Environmental Science Associates for the completion of the Environmental Impact Report. Staff recommends that the Board approve and authorize an extension of this contract for an additional six months. The environmental document is for a pending application for a General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Final Development Plan and Subdivision on an 80 acre site near the end of Central Avenue in the Vinehill area. The Bayview Residential Project consists of subdividing one parcel into 163 single family lots. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Ombudsman Services of Contra Costa, effective February 1, 2009, increasing the contract by $16,827 from $126,060 to a new payment limit of $142,887, with no change in the contract term of July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009 to provide Long Term Care Ombudsman Services to Seniors. (No County Match) FISCAL IMPACT: No County Costs: $142,887 Older Americans Act Title IIIB and Title VII; 100% Federal (CFDA#93.042, #93.044) BACKGROUND: Ombudsman Services of Contra Costa provides long-term care ombudsman services for adults including mediation and conciliation services, creation of Family Councils for support of families of long term care residents, report investigation of physical abuse of all dependent adult and elder residents of long term care facilities, education and training of senior’s rights, benefits, and entitlements. The California Department of Aging APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: John Cottrell 3-1605 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: C.76 To:Board of Supervisors From:Joe Valentine, Employment & Human Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract amendment with Ombudsman Services of Contra Costa BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) (CDA) has sent notification of changes in funding availability for Long Term Care Ombudsman services that have resulted in a net increase of $16,827 in funds available for FY 2008/2009 for this contracted service. #40-009-34 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Psychotherapy Institute of Individual, Family and Community Development, a corporation, effective February 1, 2009, to increase the payment limit by $17,636 to a new payment limit not to exceed $77,636 with no change in the term of March 1, 2008 through February 28, 2010, to provide additional court ordered Mental Health Services not anticipated in the original contract to Children and Family Services (CFS) clients who do not qualify for Medi-Cal Services. (100% County Funds) FISCAL IMPACT: $77,636: 100% County Funds BACKGROUND: Mental health services are often ordered by the Court for Children and Family Services (CFS) clients who do not qualify for Medi-Cal Services. This contract amendment will authorize an increase in the total contract payment limit for the contractor to provide additional court ordered mental health services to non Medi-Cal eligible CFS clients. (19-085-3) APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Valerie Earley, 3-1583 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: C.78 To:Board of Supervisors From:Joe Valentine, Employment & Human Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract amendment with Psychotherapy Institute of Individual, Family and Community Development. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract supports all five of the community outcomes established in the Children’s Report Card: 1) “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School”; 2) “Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood”; 3) “Families that are Economically Self Sufficient”; 4) “Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing”; and 5) “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families.” This is accomplished by providing mental health medical coverage for children and families in need. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee to execute a contract with Buck Consultants, in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for consultation and coordination of the County’s Benefit Task Force Committee for the period of July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the contract will be paid from the County’s cost center for employee benefits, as the services provided by Buck Consultants concern analysis of employee benefits provided by the County. BACKGROUND: The County issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for assistance with a new benefit design plan and Buck Consultant, LLC was selected. At the direction of the County Administrator and during the term of the contract Buck Consultants, LLC facilitated all Benefit Task Force Committee meetings and maintain all task force records, minutes and materials; provided subject matter expertise, underwriting and actuarial services; and advised the County as needed. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll, 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson , Deputy cc: C.65 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:CONTRACT WITH BUCK CONSULTANTS FOR BENEFIT TASK FORCE CONSULTATION SERVICES RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Pat Godley) to execute on behalf of the County, Contract #23–326–7 with Aspira Technologies, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $500,000, to provide temporary Programmer/Analysts for the Department’s Information Systems Unit, for the period from April 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by budgeted Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: On April 1, 2008, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23 326 6 with Aspira Technologies, Inc., for the period from April 1, 2008 through March 31, 2009, for the provision of consultation and technical assistance to the Department with regard to designing, developing, maintaining, and enhancing custom software applications. Approval of Contract #23-326-7 will allow the Contractor to continue providing services through March 31, 2010. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 957-5410 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Barbara Borbon, HS Contracts, Detra Morgan, HS Contracts C.80 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23–326–7 with Aspira Technologies, Inc. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Patricia Tanquary), to execute on behalf of the County Contract #27–332-3 with Elizabeth A. Odumakinde, M.D., a self-employed individual, in an amount not to exceed $140,000, to provide professional hematology/oncology services for the Contra Costa Health Plan members, for the period from February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2011. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Contra Costa Health Plan member premiums. Costs depend upon utilization. BACKGROUND: The Health Plan has an obligation to provide certain specialized professional health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. In April 2008, the County Administrator approved and the Purchasing Services Manager executed Contract #27-332-2 with Elizabeth A. Odumakinde, M.D., for the period from February 1, 2008 through January 31, 2009, to provide professional APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Tanquary 313-6004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Demetria Gary, Barbara Borbon C.77 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #27-332-3 with Elizabeth A. Odumakinde, M.D. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) hematology/oncology services. Approval of Contract #27-332-3 will allow the Contractor to continue providing services through January 31, 2011. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Patricia Tanquary), to execute on behalf of the County Contract #27-640-3 with Noel T. D. Chiu, M.D., a self-employed individual, in an amount not to exceed $120,000, to provide professional dermatology services for Contra Costa Health Plan members, for the period from February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2011. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Contra Costa Health Plan member premiums. Costs depend upon utilization. BACKGROUND: The Health Plan has an obligation to provide certain specialized professional health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. On March 11, 2008, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-640-2 with Noel T.D. Chiu, M.D. to provide dermatology services for Contra Costa Health Plan members, for the period from February 1, 2008 through January 31, 2009. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Tanquary 313-6004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Demetria Gary, Barbara Borbon C.88 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #27-640-3 with Noel T. D. Chiu, M.D. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract #27-640-3 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide services, through January 31, 2011. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Patricia Tanquary) to execute on behalf of the County, Contract #27–686-2 with Michael Sherman, M.D., Ph.D., (dba Contra Costa Oncology), a professional corporation, in an amount not to exceed $140,000, to provide professional oncology services for Contra Costa Health Plan members for the period from February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2011. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Contra Costa Health Plan member premiums. Costs depend upon utilization. BACKGROUND: The Health Plan has an obligation to provide certain specialized professional health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. In April 2008, the County Administrator approved and the Purchasing Services Manager executed Contract #27–686-1 with Michael Sherman, M.D., Ph.D., (dba Contra Costa Oncology), for the period from February 1, 2008 through APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Tanquary 313-6004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Demetria Gary, Barbara Borbon C.86 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #27-686-2 with Michael Sherman, M.D., Ph.D., (dba Contra Costa Oncology) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) January 31, 2009, to provide professional oncology services for Contra Costa Health Plan members. Approval of Contract #27–686-2 will allow the Contractor to continue providing professional oncology services to Health Plan members, through January 31, 2011. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Patricia Tanquary), to execute on behalf of the County Contract #27–287-9 with Louis Klein, M.D., Inc., a professional corporation, in an amount not to exceed $340,000, to provide professional OB/GYN services for the Contra Costa Health Plan members, for the period from February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2011. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Contra Costa Health Plan member premiums. Costs depend upon utilization. BACKGROUND: The Health Plan has an obligation to provide certain specialized professional health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County. On July 10, 2007, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-287-8 with Louis Klein, M.D., Inc., for the period from February 1, 2007 through January 31, 2009, for professional OB/GYN services for Contra Costa Health Plan APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Tanquary 313-6004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Demetria Gary, Barbara Borbon C.87 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #27–287-9 with Louis Klein, M.D., Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) members. Approval of Contract #27-287-9 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide professional OB/GYN services to Health Plan members, through January 31, 2011. RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee (Donna Wigand) to execute on behalf of the County, Contract #74-324-1 with Gloria H. Betinck, M.D., a self-employed individual, in an amount not to exceed $235,000, to provide professional outpatient psychiatric services at the Adult Mental Health Clinic, for the period from February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2010. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Mental Health Realignment, offset by third-party billing. BACKGROUND: For a number of years the County has contracted with medical, dental and mental health specialists to provide specialized professional services, which are not otherwise available. On January 22, 2008 the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74 324 with Gloria H. Betinck, M.D., a self-employed individual, for the period from February 1, 2008 through January 31, 2009, to provide professional outpatient APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Donna Wigand, 957-5111 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Barbara Borbon, Tasha Scott C.73 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #74–324-1 with Gloria H. Bentinck, M.D. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) psychiatric services at the Adult Mental Health Clinic. Approval of contract #74-324-1, will allow the Contractor to continue to provide professional outpatient psychiatric services for patients at the County’s Adult Mental Health Clinic in Concord, through January 31, 2010. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Information Officer, or designee, to execute a contract with Cost Control Associates Inc. (CCA) in an amount not to exceed $200,000 to provide cost recovery and reduction service for telephone (local, long distance and internet) and water services for the period of February 1, 2009 through January 31, 2013. FISCAL IMPACT: Contract costs will be recovered through refunds and cost savings identified by Cost Control Associates. BACKGROUND: The services provided by CCA will include auditing of phone service and water charges, which may lead to future cost savings. This is a contingency fee contract based on the refunds and cost savings identified by CCA. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Tom Whittington-DoIT 313-1204 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Terry Mann, Rich Seithel C.90 To:Board of Supervisors From:Tom Whittington, Chief Information Officer Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Cost Recovery and Reduction for County Telephone and Water Services ATTACHMENTS Scanned Admin Scanned Admin RECOMMENDATION(S): AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to purchase: • 8 Philips IntelliVue MP 5 monitors to increase monitoring capability of the Emergency Department • 5 Philips M3155 Servers to upgrade central station servers and make available patient transfer • Ancillary equipment, software and installation services as listed on Requisition #02317 FISCAL IMPACT: Total cost of the monitors, servers, software, installation services and ancillary equipment (excluding tax) is $144,998.98. The cost is included in the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (100% Enterprise Fund I) budget. BACKGROUND: Our current servers are no longer supported by the manufacturer. Parts APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dave Duet, 370-5418 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, Barbara Borbon C.85 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Expansion of Bedside Patient Monitoring Devices in the Emergency Department and Upgrade of Central Station Servers for Patient Tra BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and technical support for these devices is no longer possible. Recent failures of the central station servers in the Intermediate Care Department (IMCU) and the Emergency Department (ED) make this an urgent purchase. The ED census over the past 3 years has tripled and patient care acuity has also increased, requiring more patients to need physiologic monitoring which includes an electrocardiogram (EKG) waveform, oxygen saturation levels, respiration readings and blood pressure readings. ED monitors are mandatory for the safe treatment of our patients. ATTACHMENTS \\financeserver\scan\Scan2\DOC020609.pdf RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute a contract amendment/extension with Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller and Naylor to extend the term from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009 with no increase in the payment limit for advice and legal representation on Indian Gaming issues, as recommended by the Legislation Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact as the contract amount is unchanged. BACKGROUND: The law firm of Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Mueller and Naylor (“Nielsen Merksamer”) has extensive experience with Indian Gaming issues. Cathy Christian, the primary consultant, is a nationally recognized expert on Indian Gaming issues and has represented Contra Costa, Yolo, Sonoma, Marin, Amador and Tulare counties. Prior to joining the firm of Nielsen Merksamer, Ms. Christian served in the California Attorney General's office, where she was a senior advisor to the Attorney General on gambling and Indian law and was General Counsel to the California APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 5-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: C.91 To:Board of Supervisors From:Legislation Committee Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Extension for Representation on Indian Gaming Issues BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Horse Racing Board. Ms. Christian is also Contra Costa County’s lead legislative advocate in Sacramento, and so has an excellent understanding of the County. Indian Gaming continues to be a significant issue for the County. Since March 2005, under this contract, Ms. Christian’s advice and guidance has been invaluable in advancing the Board’s policy positions on Indian Gaming. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute an increase to Purchase Order #23497 with Kent Oil Service Inc. on behalf of the Department of Public Works, in the amount of $397,212.00 to purchase asphaltic emulsion PMCRS-2H as specified for the 2009 Chip Seal Program. This is the first year of a two year extension of the purchase order. FISCAL IMPACT: The additional cost of $397,212.00 for the 2009 Chip Seal Program is budgeted for FY 2009/2010. BACKGROUND: The placement of rock chip seal to resurface County roads is a long established preventative maintenance practice. This purchase order is to supply asphaltic emulsion PMCRS-2H for the 2009 Chip Seal Program. A chip seal increases the asphalt pavement life by an extra 7 to 10 years before another surface treatment is needed. This is the first year of a two year extension of the purchase order. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925-313-7044 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: C.67 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Issue an Increase to PO#23497 Kent Oil Service Inc. for the 2009 Chip Seal Program, Countywide (All Districts), [Project No. 0672-6U2150, 0672-6U2151] ATTACHMENTS Kent's Oil Service Inc. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute an increase to Purchase Order #23498 with Contract Sweeping Service on behalf of the Department of Public Works, in the amount of $146,985.00 for street sweeping required for the 2009 Chip Seal Program. This is the first year of a two year extension of the purchase order. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost $146,985.00 for the 2009 Chip Seal Program is budgeted for FY 2009/2010. BACKGROUND: The placement of rock chip seal to resurface County roads is a long established preventative maintenance practice. In order to assure complete coverage of asphalt applied to the old road surface, excess rock chips are distributed and must be removed by sweeping. It is not economical for th Public Works Department to own and operate the number of sweepers necessary to support the Chip Seal Program. Sweeping service has historically been procured by purchase order. This is the first year of a two year extension of the purchase order. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925-313-7044 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: C.70 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Issue an Increase to PO#23498 Contract Sweeping Service for the 2009 Chip Seal Program, Countywide (All Districts), [Project No. 0672-6U2150/51] ATTACHMENTS Contract Sweeping Service RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute an increase to Purchase Order #23925 with George Reed Table Mountain Quarry on behalf of the Department of Public Works, in the amount of $225,000.00 to purchase aggregate for the 2009 Chip Seal Program. This is an one year extension option of the purchase order. FISCAL IMPACT: The additional costs of $225,000.00 for the 2009 Chip Seal Program is budgeted for FY 2009/2010. BACKGROUND: The placement of rock chip seal to resurface County roads is a long established preventative maintenance practice. This purchase order is to supply chip seal aggregate for the 2009 Chip Seal Program. A chip seal increases the asphalt pavement life by an extra 7 to 10 years before another surface treatment is needed. This is an one year extension option of the purchase order. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925-313-7044 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: C.69 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Issue an Increase to PO#23925 George Reed Table Mt. Quarry for the 2009 Chip Seal Program., Countywide (All Districts), [Project No. 0672-6U2150/51] ATTACHMENTS George Reed Table Mountain Quarry RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute an increase to Purchase Order #24032 with Cooper Trucking on behalf of the Department of Public Works, in the amount of $250,950.00 for truck transport services for the 2009 Chip Seal Program. This is the first year of a two year extension of the purchase order. FISCAL IMPACT: The additional costs of $250,950.00 for the 2009 Chip Seal Program is budgeted for FY 2009/2010. BACKGROUND: The placement of rock chip seal to resurface County roads is a long established preventative maintenance practice. It is not economical for the Public Works Department to own and operate the number of trucks necessary to support the Chip Seal Program. Trucking service has historically been procured from outside vendors. This is the first year of a two year extension of the purchase order. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925-313-7044 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: C.68 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Issue and Increase to PO#24032 Cooper Trucking for the 2009 Chip Seal Program, Countywide (All Districts), [Project No. 0672-6U2150, 0672-6U2151] ATTACHMENTS Cooper Trucking 2009 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designnee, to issue a Request for Proposal (RFP #1107) for mandated Child Welfare Drug Testing Services in an amount not to exceed $300,000. FISCAL IMPACT: $300,000: 30% County; 70% State Child Welfare Allocation BACKGROUND: Random substance abuse testing and Sweat Patch testing are court-required services and are ordered as part of the client service plan. Laboratory results are submitted for inclusion in the Court Hearing(s) on Child Welfare Family Maintenance and Reunification cases. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925.313.1648 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Patricia Wyrick, Valerie Earley, Earl Maciel C.71 To:Board of Supervisors From:Joe Valentine, Employment & Human Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Mandated Child Welfare Drug Testing Services RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT 2008 Annual Report from the Contra Costa County Public Law Library, as recommended by the County Administrator. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: On June 18, 2002, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2002/377, which requires that each regular and ongoing board, commission, or committee shall annually report to the Board of Supervisors on its activities, accomplishments, membership attendance, required training/certification (if any), and proposed work plan or objectives for the following year, on the second Tuesday in December. The attached report fulfills this requirement for the Contra Costa County Public Law Library. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 5-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C.93 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:2008 Annual Report from the Contra Costa County Public Law Library ATTACHMENTS Advisory Body Annual Report 2008 1 ADVISORY BODY ANNUAL REPORT 2008 ADVISORY BODY: Contra Costa County Public Law Library Board of Trustees MEETING TIME: The at noon on the last Thursday of each month LOCATION: Contra Costa County Public Law Library 1020 Ward Street, Floor 1 Martinez, CA 94553 PRESIDENT DURING REPORTING PERIOD: Hon. Susanne Fenstermacher STAFFPERSON: Naomi Little / Carey Rowan REPORTING PERIOD: 2008 I. ACTIVITIES / ACCOMPLISHMENTS: The Law Library strives to provide a place conducive to learning and research and promotes progressive technologies to provide the best access to information and resources. The Library’s established working relationships with the courts and several outside legal agencies continue to provide increased access to justice for the general public and self represented litigants.  A new library director was hired for the Contra Costa County Public Law Library.  The Contra Costa County Public Law Library continued to work with the court regarding the East County expansion, including adding a branch library presence. Funds are being held in reserve for this project.  The library implemented a plan for meeting GASB 45 requirements (OPBSA), including taking steps to reserve funding and training key staff on the process.  The library added 957 print volumes and discarded or replaced 376 superseded volumes, for a total of 42,510 volumes of legal material for our users.  The library worked with the county and the courts to implement a program supporting domestic violence prevention. Unwanted cell phones are now collected at the law library for donation to STAND! The phones are distributed to victims of domestic violence. 2 II. ATTENDANCE / REPRESENTATION CCCPLL Board Attendance 2008 Canceled Attended Missed Hon. Cram 3 6 3 Hon Fenstermacher 3 7 2 Hon. Goode 3 8 1 Hon. Grossman 3 7 2 Hon. Davis 3 6 3 Mark Armstrong, Esq. 3 8 1 David Del Simone, Esq. 3 6 3 III. TRAINING / CERTIFICATION Hon. Barry Goode completed 9/2006 Hon. Joyce Cram completed 11/2006 Hon. Harlan Grossman completed 11/2006 Hon. Susanne Fenstermacher completed 11/2006 Hon. Lewis Davis completed 11/2007 Mark Armstrong, Esq. completed 12/2006 David Del Simone, Esq. completed 10/2006 Certificates attached V. PROPOSED WORK PLAN / OBJECTIVES FOR 2009  MARKETING/OUTREACH: Staff of the Contra Costa County Public Law Library will work to increase public awareness of the library itself, including the materials and services it offers the public.  TRAINING: There will be an increased emphasis on training, both for library staff and for developing training for general librarians in the area of legal research.  EXPANSION: The law library staff and board will continue to work with the court to plan for the additional library branch in the new Pittsburg Courthouse.  PROGRAMS: The law library will work with the local bar association and legal vendors to offer 1-2 programs carrying MCLE credit for attorneys.  COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT/EVALUATION: Review of our collection will be ongoing so as to provide relevant, cost-effective material to meet the needs of our users.  SERVICE: Staff will continue to serve the bench, members of the bar and the citizens of Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/66 (Exhibit A) approving and authorizing the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to submit a Transportation Planning Grant application to Caltrans for funds up to $300,000 for FY 2009/10 for the purpose of developing the Knightsen-Byron Area Transportation Study. FISCAL IMPACT: None to the General Fund. If awarded, the FY 2009/10 Caltrans Community-Based Transportation Planning Grant would be the funding source for the Knightsen-Byron Area Transportation Study. The maximum grant amount is $300,000 and the program requires 20% matching funds. Half the matching funds can be in-kind (staff hours). The remaining funds for the match will be provided from gas tax or Measure C/J revenue. BACKGROUND: The Community-Based Transportation Planning Grant has $3 million available statewide to eligible applicants, with a cap of $300,000 per grant. The purpose of the Community-Based Transportation Planning Grant is to fund coordinated transportation and land use planning projects that promote public engagement, livable communities, and a sustainable transportation system which includes mobility, access, and safety. Every final product delivered under this Program is expected to be a documented study, plan, or concept that can be used by the applicant to further smart growth and a community's sustainability. The County has submitted applications in the past under this program to develop plans for streetscape improvements along Bailey Road and Willow Pass Road pursuant to the Pittsburg-Bay Point BART Station Area Specific Plan. While Caltrans did not award a grant, this project was recently funded under the Transportation for Livable Communities program administered by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority. Potential projects considered by County staff for this grant program APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jamar Stamps, 925-335-1220 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: Patrick Roche, DCD, Mike Carlson, PWD C.92 To:Board of Supervisors From:Catherine Kutsuris, Conservation & Development Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Knightsen-Byron Area Transportation Study are listed below: Pacheco Boulevard/Vine Hill Area Street Standards: Unincorporated land adjacent to Martinez is undergoing infill development pressure. This project would develop design standards for future road improvements on Pacheco Boulevard and local streets to ensure these roads develop consistent with the County's "Complete Streets" policies and can support planned infill development. This project would be conducted in cooperation with the Municipal Advisory Council and the City of Martinez. Deliverables would include design standards, zoning requirements and a maintenance program. San Pablo Dam Road/Appian Way Corridor Study: El Sobrante, an unincorporated community, is a Priority Development Area, which is a designation developed by the Association of Bay Area Governments to describe communities where additional development is planned and supported. In response to community concerns, the County is in the process of amending the General Plan to limit future street widening while supporting mixed-use development along San Pablo Dam Road and Appian Way. After the General Plan is amended, design standards will be needed to provide for the ultimate upgrades to San Pablo Dam Road and Appian Way. These upgrades need to support mixed-use development and the County's "Complete Streets" policies. This project would be conducted in cooperation with the Municipal Advisory Council and cities of Richmond and Pinole. Deliverables would include design standards, zoning requirements and a maintenance program. Boulevard Way Streetscape Plan: Saranap is an unincorporated community which is served by Boulevard Way. This road extends from Olympic Boulevard at Tice Valley Boulevard to Mount Diablo Boulevard at State Route 24. A portion of Boulevard Way is located in Walnut Creek. Their general plan directs them to work with the County to study BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) "narrowing Boulevard Way to improve the pedestrian character and to provide land for intensification of development and pedestrian amenities," with a time frame to take such action by 2015. The County has a 1969 precise alignment adopted for Boulevard Way which is no longer consistent with the County General Plan. A joint study would be conducted by the County and Walnut Creek to determine the ultimate configuration of this road, and adjoining land uses. Deliverables would include design standards, zoning requirements and a maintenance program. Knightsen-Byron Area Transportation Study: This study proposes to re-evaluate the Circulation Element of the General Plan to improve its consistency with the Urban Limit Line and related policies that ensure preservation of non-urban agricultural, open space and other areas identified outside this line. The study area includes portions of land designated as Agricultural Core in the County General Plan. This area is also a Priority Conservation Area, which is a designation developed by the Association of Bay Area Governments to describe areas that encompass regionally significant conservation values and demonstrate community support and an urgent need for protection within five years. This study would be conducted in cooperation with the Knightsen Municipal Advisory Council, Byron Municipal Advisory Council, Discovery Bay Community Services District and the cities of Oakley and Brentwood. Potential outcomes of the study include: revisions to the Circulation Element and related General Plan policies for the study area; revisions to the off-site fee program that funds transportation upgrades in the area; and zoning revisions for ultimate road cross sections and frontage improvements. Exhibit B to this Board Order provides an evaluation matrix that was used to evaluate the County's potential projects for the Caltrans grant program. These projects address transportation planning issues that are current priorities for the County, and were evaluated using the transportation goals established by Caltrans for the grant program. The Knightsen-Byron Area Transportation Study rated highest as potentially the most favorable project to be evaluated by Caltrans. County staff will move froward on addressing the planning issues for the other project areas described in the matrix as opportunities arise. The Transportation Water and Infrastructure Committee will review this report at its February 19 meeting. The Committee will report to the Board if any changes are made to this report as written. ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution Resolution No. 2009/66 Exhibit B THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/24/2009 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2009/66 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ON CONSIDERATION OF APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR, OR DESIGNEE, TO SUBMIT A TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANT APPLICATION TO CALTRANS FOR FUNDS UP TO $300,000 FOR FY 2009/10 FOR THE KNIGHTSEN-BYRON AREA TRANSPORTATION STUDY, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE TRANSPORTATION WATER AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE. WHEREAS, the County approved a transition agreement with the City of Oakley to collect $27 million from new development on the East Cypress Corridor for County road improvements in the Knightsen-Byron Area consistent with the County General Plan; WHEREAS, the County has approved an Area of Benefit Program to collect fees from development in the unincorporated area to fund County road improvements in the Knightsen-Byron Area consistent with the County General Plan; WHEREAS, the County recognizes concerns expressed by the Knightsen Town Advisory Council regarding future road improvements that the County General Plan proposes in the Knightsen-Byron area; WHEREAS, the County desires to work with interested community stakeholders to prepare the Knightsen-Byron Transportation Area Study for the purpose of reviewing the County General Plan Circulation Element policies for the area to ensure future road improvements are cost effective and consistent with, among other things, the existing rural and agricultural characteristics of the area; and WHEREAS, Caltrans has requested applications for grant funds for community-based transportation planning projects. Contact: Jamar Stamps, 925-335-1220 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Patrick Roche, DCD, Mike Carlson, PWD NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors hereby authorizes and directs the Conservation and Development Department Director, or designee, to complete and deliver a Transportation Planning Grant application to Caltrans for funds up to $300,000 for FY 2009/10 for the purpose of developing the Knightsen-Byron Area Transportation Study. EXHIBIT B Page 1 of 2 EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CALTRANS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANT PROGRAM (MAXIMUM 3 POINTS AWARDED PER GOAL) Pacheco Blvd/Vine Hill Area Street Standards SPDam Road/Appian Way Corridor Study Boulevard Way Streetscape Plan Knightsen- Byron Area Transportation Study FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION GOALS 1. Support the economic viability of the metropolitan area, esp. by enabling global competitiveness, productivity, and efficiency. (N.A.) Project addresses needs of an unincorporated community. (N.A.) Project addresses needs of an unincorporated community. (N.A.) Project addresses needs of an unincorporated community. (N.A.) Project addresses needs of an unincorporated community. 2. Increase the safety of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. (3) Gaps in facilities for peds/bikes/transit. Project will apply the “complete streets” policy (3) Gaps in facilities for peds/bikes/transit. Project will apply the “complete streets” policy (3) Gaps in facilities for peds/bikes/transit. Project will apply the “complete streets” policy (3) Gaps in facilities for peds/bikes/transit. Project will apply the “complete streets” policy 3. Increase the security of the transportation system for motorized and non-motorized users. (N.A.) Transportation security is not an issue. (N.A.) Transportation security is not an issue. (N.A.) Transportation security is not an issue. (N.A.) Transportation security is not an issue. 4. Increase the accessibility and mobility of people and freight. (1) Increases access and mobility for people. (1) Increases access and mobility for people. (1) Increases access and mobility for people. (3) Increases access and mobility for people and goods. 5. Protect and enhance the environment, promote energy conservation, improve the quality of life, and promote consistency between transportation improvements and State and local planned growth and economic development patterns. (2) This is not a Priority Development Area so does not improve consistency with the Regional FOCUS Program. (3) This is a Priority Development Area. (2) This is not a Priority Development Area so does not improve consistency with the Regional FOCUS Program. (3) This is a Priority Conservation Area. 6. Enhance the integration and connectivity of the transportation system, across and between modes, for people and freight. (1) Enhances integration and connectivity between modes for people. (1) Enhances integration and connectivity between modes for people. (1) Enhances integration and connectivity between modes for people. (2) Enhances integration and connectivity between modes for people and goods. 7. Promote efficient system management and operation. N.A. N.A N.A N.A 8. Emphasize the preservation of the existing transportation system. N.A. N.A N.A N.A EXHIBIT B Page 2 of 2 EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS FOR CALTRANS TRANSPORTATION PLANNING GRANT PROGRAM (MAXIMUM 3 POINTS AWARDED PER GOAL) Pacheco Blvd/Vine Hill Area Street Standards SPDam Road/Appian Way Corridor Study Boulevard Way Streetscape Plan Knightsen- Byron Area Transportation Study CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION PLAN GOALS 1. Improve Mobility and Accessibility: Expanding the system and enhancing modal choices and connectivity to meet the State’s future transportation demands. (2) Does not expand the system. (2) Does not expand the system. (2) Does not expand the system. (3) Expands the system to accommodate commuter traffic. 2. Preserve the Transportation System : Maintaining, managing, and efficiently utilizing California’s existing transportation system. (2) Evaluates use of existing right of way and maintenance needs. (3) Evaluates use of existing right of way, maintenance needs and ability to reduce future road expansion. (3) Evaluates use of existing right of way, maintenance needs, and ability to reduce future road expansion. (3) Evaluates use of existing right of way, maintenance needs and ability to reduce future road expansion. 3. Support the Economy: Maintaining, managing, and enhancing the movement of goods and people to spur the economic development and growth, job creation, and trade. N.A. (2) Supports revitalizing downtown El Sobrante and additional housing for the region. N.A. (2) Supports agriculture and commuting to job centers. 4. Enhance Public Safety and Security: Ensuring the safety and security of people, goods, services, and information in all modes of transportation. (1) Gaps exist in facilities for peds and bikes. Project will apply the County’s “complete streets” policy. (1) Gaps exist in facilities for peds and bikes. Project will apply the County’s “complete streets” policy. (1) Gaps exist in facilities for peds and bikes. Project will apply the County’s “complete streets” policy. (1) Gaps exist in facilities for peds and bikes. Project will apply the County’s “complete streets” policy. 5. Reflect Community Values: Finding transportation solutions that balance and integrate community values with transportation safety and performance, and encourage public involvement in transportation decision. (3) Project responds to community comments and will involve all stakeholders. (3) Project responds to community comments and will involve all stakeholders. (3) Project responds to community comments and will involve all stakeholders. (3) Project responds to community comments and will involve all stakeholders. 6. Enhance the Environment: Planning and providing transportation services while protecting our environment, wildlife, and historical and cultural assets. (1) Project will comply with CEQA. (1) Project will comply with CEQA. (1) Project will comply with CEQA. (2) Project will comply with CEQA and protect agriculture. TOTAL POINTS FOR GRANT GOALS (16) (20) (17) (25) RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and ACCEPT the recommendation of the Lien Committee to reduce the County’s medical lien to $5,000 for medical care rendered to the minor child of Edward Castillo for treatment of injuries resulting from an automobile accident on May 26, 2007. FISCAL IMPACT: The net County cost is $34,456. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County California Children Services authorized and paid for trauma services provided at John Muir Medical Center for the minor child of Edward Castillo, who was injured in a motor vehicle accident on May 26, 2007. Edward Castillo, on behalf of his minor child, engaged the Law Offices of Arnold Laub, to pursue damages from the driver of the vehicle that caused the accident and injured the child. Pursuant to Government Code Section 23004.1, Civil Code Section 3045.1, and Resolution No 67/963, Contra Costa County has a statutory lien against any damages recovered by Edward Castillo from APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Rich Seithel (925) 335-1024 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Emy L. Sharp, Deputy cc: C.95 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Medical Lien Reduction BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) the responsible third party. The attorney for Edward Castillo has requested that the County accept $5,000 instead of its medical costs of $73,912, due to financial hardship to the family and the fact that the defendant’s insurance policy limit is only $15,000. The Lien Committee has reviewed the facts and circumstances of this case and is therefore recommending that the County agree to compromise its lien and accept $5,000 for its medical lien. The minor child will receive $5,000 and Mr. Laub will receive the remaining $5,000. The fiscal impact to the County is $34,456, because the State of California is responsible for one-half of the medical expenses and the State will also receive one-half of the County’s $5,000 share of this reimbursement. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2009/85, approving a Fifth Amendment to Master Pledge and Assignment Agreement related to the County’s 2005 issuance of $18,634,000 of Multi-Family Housing Revenue Bonds to finance the Giant Road Family Apartments, San Pablo. FISCAL IMPACT: No General Fund obligation is involved. Bonds have been issued, and the County is reimbursed for costs associated with issuance of bonds. Annual expenses related to monitoring of the Regulatory Agreement are accommodated in the bond issue. The bonds to be issued will be solely secured by a pledge of revenues (rents, reserves, etc.) pledged under the bond documents. No County funds are pledged to secure the bonds. BACKGROUND: Giant Road Family Apartments is an 86-unit project located at 2832 Giant Road, San Pablo. The project was financed with multi-family housing revenue bonds issued by the County in 2005. The project was completed and opened in 2007. The ownership entity is Giant Development, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jim Kennedy 5-7225 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C.94 To:Board of Supervisors From:Catherine Kutsuris, Conservation & Development Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Multi-Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds – Giant Road Family Apartments Project, San Pablo BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) L.P., a California limited partnership, with East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation (EBALDC) as the managing General Partner. The project also included County financing in the form of Community Development Block Grant funds of $60,000 and HOME Investment Partnership funds of $600,000. San Pablo also provided $450,000 of the financing with redevelopment funds. Due to the complexity in coordinating project-based Section 8 and Shelter Plus financing, the project continues to experience delays in achieving a final loan closing. The recommended action is the approval of the Fifth Amendment to Master Pledge and Assignment amending and supplementing the Original Pledge and Assignment in order to provide for a new maturity date of May 1, 2009 (or such later date requested by U.S. Bank National Association, and any successors and assigns) for the 2005 Series A-2 Bonds. The Board’s action acknowledges that a public hearing has been held by the Deputy Director – Redevelopment as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2009/85 RECOMMENDATION(S): REFER to the Internal Operations Committee for its July 2009 meeting the matter of updating the January 2006 Contra Costa Emergency Operations Plan for review, update, and recommendations. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa County Emergency Operations Plan prepared by the Office of the Sheriff Emergency Services Division was adopted by the Emergency Services Policy Board in January, 2006 and needs to be reviewed and updated. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Stephen Dexter, 925-335-1046 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C.96 To:Board of Supervisors From:Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:REFER to the Internal Operations Committee for its July 2009 meeting the matter of updating the January 2006 Contra Costa Emergency Operations Plan RECOMMENDATION(S): 1) ACCEPT recommendation of the Fish and Wildlife Committee regarding the awarding of two grants from the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund. 2) DIRECT the Auditor/Controller to release $1,163.40 from the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund to the Department of Conservation and Development for the Volunteer Creek Monitoring Program to support stream monitoring activities benefiting the fish and wildlife resources of the County. 3) DIRECT the Auditor/Controller to release $18,705.00 from the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund to the Urban Creeks Council for the Rheem Creek Restoration and Watershed Education Project to support restoration activities at Contra Costa College in San Pablo that will benefit the fish and wildlife resources of the County. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact to the general APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Michelle Luebke, 335-1315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Daniel Pellegrini C.97 To:Board of Supervisors From:Chair, Fish and Wildlife Committee Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FROM THE FISH AND WILDLIFE PROPAGATION FUND TO SUPPORT PROJECTS THAT BENEFIT FISH AND WILDLIFE FISCAL IMPACT: (CONT'D) fund. A portion of the fines collected from violations of fish and game regulations in the County is deposited in the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund, which has a current balance of approximately $300,000. State law defines how money in this fund may be spent, but the Board of Supervisors is responsible for authorizing specific expenditures. The projects recommended to receive funding are consistent with the expenditure criteria established by State Law. BACKGROUND: Since 1996, the Fish and Wildlife Committee (FWC) has implemented a structured process for reviewing funding requests. The intent of this structured review process was to replace case-by-case decision-making (such as occurred previously) with a grant process that enables comparative and efficient review of applications. Occasionally the Committee receives requests for funds outside of the regular grant cycle. These proposals must meet all the regular requirements of applications as well as the justification why the funding request should be considered outside the regular cycle. The criteria established by the FWC for considering applications outside the regular grant cycle are: • the project is a FWC-initiated project; or • delaying review of the project until the annual review cycle would cause substantial harm to the fish and wildlife resources of the County; or • the project cannot be performed at all unless funding is received from the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund sooner than would be possible under the annual review cycle; or • the project has substantial matching funds which will expire unless funding is received from the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund sooner than would be possible under the annual review cycle. The FWC discussed the funding applications at its November 2008 and January 2009 meetings and determined by unanimous votes that both proposals comply with the established criteria. The FWC also voted unanimously to recommend that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approve funding these two grant applications in full. Additional detail on the two recommended appropriations is provided below: 1) Appropriate $1,163.40 from the Contra Costa County Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund to the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development for the Volunteer Creek Monitoring Program’s analysis of benthic macroinvertebrate samples. These samples would provide critical information on the effects of vegetation removal on benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages and on the effects on benthic macroinvertebrate communities following the introduction of the invasive New Zealand Mud Snail (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). 2) Appropriate $18,705 from the Contra Costa County Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund to the Urban Creeks Council for the Rheem Creek Restoration and Watershed Education Project. This project provides funding for vegetation installation, maintenance and monitoring at a creek restoration site on Rheem Creek at Contra Costa College in San Pablo. ATTACHMENTS Volunteer Creek Monitoring Program cover page Urban Creeks Council cover page RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution 2009/48 authorizing, on behalf of Pittsburg Unified School District, the sale and issuance of General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Series B, in a principal amount not to exceed $35,000,000. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the County. BACKGROUND: Under state law, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors is required to authorize the sale and issuance of General Obligation bonds for school districts within the County. No financial obligation is assumed with these authorizations. The School District is issuing these bonds on authority granted by voter approval on November 7, 2006. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director, Brice Bins, Assistant Treasurer, Steve Ybarra, County Auditor-Controller C.98 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors authorization, the School District would not be able to issue the bonds, thereby delaying or preventing the implementation of projects approved by voters. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2009/48 Exhibit A Exhibit B District Resolution 08-34 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 02/24/2009 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2009/48 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR AUTHORIZATION OF ISSUANCE AND SALE OF PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, ELECTION OF 2006, SERIES B (2009), IN THE AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF NOT TO EXCEED $35,000,000 RESOLVED, by the Board of Supervisors (the “Board”) of Contra Costa County, California (the “County”), as follows: WHEREAS, an election was regularly held in the Pittsburg Unified School District (the “District”) on November 7, 2006, at which a proposition was submitted to the electors of the District to authorize the District to issue and sell bonds of up to $85,000,000 in aggregate principal amount to build new classrooms at Pittsburg high schools, emphasize science, technology, and vocational rooms, separate ninth and tenth grade classrooms and facilities, upgrade cafeteria and library, renovate restrooms, and upgrade electrical and plumbing systems (collectively, the “Project”), and, as set forth in the Bond project list: Pittsburg High School • Build new permanent classrooms, emphasizing science and computer/vocational labs. • Build new separate classrooms and facilities to better accommodate ninth and tenth grade students. Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director, Brice Bins, Assistant Treasurer, Steve Ybarra, County Auditor-Controller • Upgrade the high school electrical systems in order to improve student access to computers and technology. • Replace aging plumbing and renovate restrooms. • Expand and upgrade vocational and career technology classrooms. • Renovate support facilities and administrative offices. • Upgrade heating and ventilating systems. • Buy new classroom desks, chairs and tables. • Build a new library and cafeteria. Riverside High School • Create new classrooms, including science and technology/vocational labs. • Improve heating, ventilating, plumbing, and electrical systems. Other Projects • Construct classrooms and support facilities necessary to meet expanding student population. • Remove hazardous materials, e.g., asbestos, lead, etc., where necessary. • Provide other improvements to comply with access requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. • Furnish and equip newly constructed and renovated classrooms and facilities. • Perform site work (including demolition) as necessary in connection with new construction or installation or removal of relocatable classrooms. • Rent or construct temporary classrooms (including relocatables) as needed to house students displaced during construction. WHEREAS, at least 55% of the votes cast on said proposition were in favor of issuing said bonds, payable from the levy of an ad valorem tax against the taxable property in the District (the “Bonds”); WHEREAS, the Board has previously received a resolution of the Governing Board of the District requesting the issuance of an initial series of Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $15,000,000 to be entitled Pittsburg Unified School District (Contra Costa County, California) General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Series A (the “Series A Bonds”), for the purpose of raising funds needed to finance a portion of the Project and other authorized costs, and the Board has issued the Series A Bonds; WHEREAS, the Board has received a resolution of the Governing Board of the District requesting the issuance of the second series of Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $35,000,000 to be entitled Pittsburg Unified School District (Contra Costa County, California) General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Series B (2009) (the “Series B Bonds”), for the purpose of raising funds needed to finance a portion of the Project and other authorized costs; and WHEREAS, in its resolution, the District found and informed this Board that all acts, conditions and things required by law to be done or performed have been done and performed in strict conformity with the laws authorizing the issuance of general obligation bonds of the District, and the indebtedness of the District, including this proposed issue of Series B Bonds, is within all limits prescribed by law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California, as follows: Section 1. Purpose of Series B Bonds. That for the purpose of raising money for real property acquisition or improvements, namely: (a) for the purpose of raising funds needed for the Project, and (b) to pay all necessary legal, financial, engineering and contingent costs in connection therewith, the Board hereby authorizes the issuance of the Series B Bonds. Section 2. Sale of the Series B Bonds; Approval of Bond Purchase Agreement. The form of bond purchase agreement by and among the County, the District and to such underwriter as shall be selected by the District (the “Underwriter”), substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Bond Purchase Agreement”), is hereby approved and the Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County (the “Treasurer-Tax Collector”), or a designated deputy thereof, or the Chairman of the Board or such Chairman’s designee is hereby authorized to execute and deliver the Bond Purchase Agreement, and the Superintendent of the District or the Assistant Superintendent, Business Services of the District, or the designee thereof, is hereby authorized and requested to acknowledge the execution of such Bond Purchase Agreement, if necessary, but with such changes therein, deletions therefrom and modifications thereto as the Treasurer-Tax Collector, or designated deputy thereof, or the Chairman of the Board or such Chairman’s designee may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by his or her execution and delivery thereof; provided, however, that the maximum interest rate on the Series B Bonds shall not exceed the maximum rate permitted by law and the Underwriter’s compensation shall not exceed 1.25% of the par amount of the Series B Bonds. The Treasurer-Tax Collector, any designated deputy thereof, or the Chairman of the Board is further authorized to determine the principal amount of the Series B Bonds to be specified in the Bond Purchase Agreement for sale by the Board of not to exceed $35,000,000 for the purpose of raising funds for the Project and other authorized costs and to enter into and execute the Bond Purchase Agreement with the Underwriter, if the conditions set forth in this Resolution are satisfied. Section 3. Series B Bond Terms. The Series B Bonds shall be issued as fully registered Bonds, without coupons, in the denominations of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, and shall be dated as of their date of delivery. The Series B Bonds shall bear interest from the date of the Series B Bonds to maturity of each of the Series B Bonds at a rate or rates not in excess of eight percent (8%) per annum. Interest shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year (the “Interest Payment Dates”), based on a 360-day year composed of 12 months of 30 days commencing February 1, 2010, until the principal amount has been paid or provided for. Each Series B Bond shall bear interest from the Interest Payment Date next preceding the date of authentication thereof, unless (a) it is authenticated as of a business day following the 15th day of the month immediately preceding any Interest Payment Date and on or before such Interest Payment Date, in which event it shall bear interest from such Interest Payment Date, or (b) it is authenticated on or before January 15, 2010, in which event it shall bear interest from its date of delivery. The Series B Bonds shall mature (or, alternatively, be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption as hereinafter provided) on August 1 of the years and in the amounts as shall be determined at the time of sale of the Series B Bonds to the Underwriter. Section 4. Redemption of Series B Bonds. (a) Optional Redemption. The Series B Bonds maturing on or before August 1, 2018, shall not be subject to redemption prior to their respective stated maturities. The Series B Bonds maturing on or after August 1, 2019, shall be subject to redemption prior to maturity, at the option of the District, from any available source of funds, on any date on or after August 1, 2018, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof together with accrued interest thereon to the date fixed for redemption, without a premium. (b) Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption. In the event and to the extent specified in the the Bond Purchase Agreement at the time of sale of the Series B Bonds to the Underwriter, any maturity of Series B Bonds shall be designated as “Term Bonds” and shall be subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption on August 1 in each of the years set forth in the Bond Purchase Agreement, at a redemption price equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed (without premium), together with interest accrued thereon to the date fixed for redemption. If some but not all of such Term Bonds have been redeemed pursuant to the preceding subsection (a) of this Section 4, the aggregate principal amount of such Term Bonds to be redeemed in each year pursuant to this subsection (b) shall be reduced on a pro rata basis in integral multiples of $5,000, as shall be designated pursuant to written notice filed by the District with the County and the Paying Agent (as defined in Section 8 hereof). (c) Selection of Bonds for Redemption. If less than all of the Series B Bonds shall be called for redemption, the particular Series B Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed shall be called in such order as shall be directed by the District and, in lieu of such direction, in inverse order of their maturity. Within a maturity, the Paying Agent shall select the Series B Bonds for redemption by lot; provided, however, that the portion of any Series B Bond to be redeemed shall be in the principal amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000) or some integral multiple thereof and that, in selecting Series B Bonds for redemption, the Paying Agent shall treat each Series B Bond as representing that number of Series B Bonds which is obtained by dividing the principal amount of such Series B Bond by five thousand dollars ($5,000). (d) Notice of Redemption. The Paying Agent shall give notice of the redemption of the Series B Bonds at the expense of the District. Such notice shall specify: (a) that the Series B Bonds or a designated portion thereof are to be redeemed, (b) the numbers and CUSIP numbers of the Series B Bonds to be redeemed, (c) the date of notice and the date of redemption, (d) the place or places where the redemption will be made, and (e) descriptive information regarding the Series B Bonds including the dated date, interest rate and stated maturity date. Such notice shall further state that on the specified date there shall become due and payable upon each Series B Bond to be redeemed, the portion of the principal amount of such Series B Bond to be redeemed, together with interest accrued to said date, and redemption premium, if any, and that from and after such date interest with respect thereto shall cease to accrue and be payable. Notice of redemption shall be by registered or otherwise secured mail or delivery service, postage prepaid, to the registered owner of the Series B Bonds, or if the registered owner is a syndicate, to the managing member of such syndicate, to a municipal registered securities depository and to a national information service that disseminates securities redemption notices, and by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the District and County and the respective owners of any registered Series B Bonds designated for redemption at their addresses appearing on the Bond registration books, in every case at least thirty (30) days, but not more than sixty (60) days, prior to the redemption date; provided that neither failure to receive such notice nor any defect in any notice so mailed shall affect the sufficiency of the proceedings for the redemption of such Series B Bonds. (e) Partial Redemption of Bonds. Upon the surrender of any Series B Bond redeemed in part only, the Paying Agent shall execute and deliver to the registered owner thereof a new Bond or Bonds of like tenor and maturity and of authorized denominations equal in aggregate principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Series B Bonds surrendered. Such partial redemption shall be valid upon payment of the amount required to be paid to such registered owner, the County, the Paying Agent and the District shall be released and discharged thereupon from all liability to the extent of such payment. (f) Effect of Redemption. Notice having been given as aforesaid, and the moneys for the redemption (including the interest to the applicable date of redemption) having been set aside with the County for such purpose, the Series B Bonds to be redeemed shall become due and payable on such date of redemption. If on such redemption date, money for the redemption of all the Series B Bonds to be redeemed as provided in this Section 4, together with interest to such redemption date, shall be held by the Treasurer-Tax Collector so as to be available therefor on such redemption date, and if notice of redemption thereof shall have been given as aforesaid, then from and after such redemption date, interest with respect to the Series B Bonds to be redeemed shall cease to accrue and become payable. All money held by or on behalf of the Treasurer-Tax Collector for the redemption of Series B Bonds shall be held in trust for the account of the registered owners of the Series B Bonds so to be redeemed. All Series B Bonds paid at maturity or redeemed prior to maturity pursuant to the provisions of this Section 4 shall be canceled upon surrender thereof and be delivered to or upon the order of the County and the District. All or any portion of a Series B Bond purchased by the County or the District shall be canceled by the Paying Agent. Series B Bonds (or portions thereof), which have been duly called for redemption prior to maturity under the provisions of this resolution, or with respect to which irrevocable instructions to call for redemption prior to maturity at the earliest redemption date have been given to the Paying Agent, in form satisfactory to it, and sufficient moneys shall be held by the Treasurer-Tax Collector irrevocably in trust for the payment of the redemption price of such Bonds or portions thereof, all as provided in this resolution, then such Series B Bonds shall no longer be deemed outstanding and shall be surrendered to the Paying Agent for cancellation. Section 5. Execution of Bonds. The Series B Bonds shall be signed by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Chair of the Board of Supervisors, the Clerk of the Board and the Treasurer-Tax Collector, and the seal of the County shall be reproduced thereon. No Series B Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or shall be entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until the certificate of authentication printed on the Series B Bond is signed by the Paying Agent as authenticating agent, that the Series B Bond as authenticated has been duly issued, signed and delivered under this resolution and is entitled to the security and benefit of this resolution. Section 6. Appointment of Paying Agent. The Board hereby appoints The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., San Francisco, California, to act as the authenticating agent, bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (collectively, the “Paying Agent”) for the Series B Bonds. All fees and expenses incurred for services of the Paying Agent shall be the sole responsibility of the District. (a) The Paying Agent may at any time resign and be discharged of the duties and obligations created by this resolution by giving at least 60 days' written notice to the District and the Treasurer-Tax Collector. The Paying Agent may be removed at any time by an instrument filed with such Paying Agent and the Treasurer-Tax Collector and signed by the District. A successor Paying Agent shall be appointed by the District with the written consent of the Treasurer-Tax Collector, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, and shall be a bank or trust company organized under the laws of the state or any state of the United States, a national banking association or any other financial institution, having capital stock and surplus aggregating at least $50,000,000, and willing and able to accept the office on reasonable and customary terms and authorized by law to perform all the duties imposed upon it by this resolution. Such Paying Agent shall signify the acceptance of its duties and obligations hereunder by executing and delivering to the District and the Treasurer-Tax Collector, a written acceptance thereof. Resignation or removal of the Paying Agent shall be effective upon appointment and acceptance of a successor Paying Agent. (b) In the event of the resignation or removal of the Paying Agent, such Paying Agent shall pay over, assign and deliver any moneys held by it as Paying Agent to its successor, or, if there is no successor, to the Treasurer-Tax Collector. In the event that for any reason there shall be a vacancy in the office of the Paying Agent, the Treasurer-Tax Collector shall act as the Paying Agent. The County shall promptly cause to be published at District expense in an Authorized Newspaper the name and principal corporate trust office address of the Paying Agent appointed to replace any resigned or removed Paying Agent. Section 7. Payment of Principal and Interest. The principal of and interest on the Series B Bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America without deduction for the services of the Paying Agent. Principal shall be payable when due upon presentation and surrender of the Series B Bonds at the principal corporate trust office of the Paying Agent. Interest on a Series B Bond shall be paid on each Interest Payment Date by check or draft mailed by first class mail to the person in whose name the Series B Bond was registered, and to that person's address appearing on the Bond Register (as defined in Section 8 below) at the close of business on the 15th day of the calendar month next preceding such Interest Payment Date (a “Record Date”). Section 8. Bond Registration and Transfer. If the book entry system is no longer in effect as provided in Section 10, the District shall cause the Paying Agent to maintain and keep at its principal corporate trust office all books and records necessary for the registration, exchange and transfer of the Series B Bonds as provided in this Section 8 (the “Bond Register”). while such book entry system is in effect, such books need not be kept, as the Series B Bonds will be represented by one Bond for each maturity registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC. Subject to the provisions of Section 7 above, the person in whose name a Series B Bond is registered on the Bond Register shall be regarded as the absolute owner of that Series B Bond for all purposes of this resolution. Payment of or on account of the principal of and interest on any Series B Bond shall be made only to or upon the order of that person; neither the District, the County nor the Paying Agent shall be affected by any notice to the contrary, but the registration may be changed as provided in this Section 8. All such payments shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the District's liability upon the Series B Bonds, including interest, to the extent of the amount or amounts so paid. Any Series B Bond may be exchanged for Series B Bonds of a like maturity in any authorized denomination, upon presentation Any Series B Bond may be exchanged for Series B Bonds of a like maturity in any authorized denomination, upon presentation and surrender at the office of the Paying Agent designated for such purpose, together with a request for exchange signed by the registered owner or by a person legally empowered to do so in a form satisfactory to the Paying Agent. Any Bond may, in accordance with its terms, but only if the District determines to no longer maintain the book entry only status of the Series B Bonds or if DTC determines to discontinue providing such services and no successor securities depository is named or DTC requests the District to deliver Bond certificates to particular DTC Participants, be transferred, upon the books required to be kept pursuant to the provisions of this Section 8, by the person in whose name it is registered, in person or by his duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of such Bond for cancellation at the office of the Paying Agent, accompanied by delivery of a written instrument of transfer in a form approved by the Paying Agent, duly executed. Neither the District, the County nor the Paying Agent will be required: (a) to issue or transfer any Series B Bonds during a period beginning with the opening of business on the 15th calendar day next preceding either any Interest Payment Date or any date of selection of Series B Bonds to be redeemed and ending with the close of business on the Interest Payment Date or day on which the applicable notice of redemption is given, or (b) to transfer any Series B Bonds which have been selected or called for redemption in whole or in part. Section 9. Form of Bond. The Series B Bonds shall be in substantially the form set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein, allowing those officials executing the Series B Bonds to make the insertions and deletions necessary to conform the Series B Bonds to this resolution and the provisions of the Bond Purchase Agreement at the time of sale of the Series B Bonds to the Underwriter. Section 10. Book-Entry System. Except as provided below, the owner of all of the Series B Bonds shall be The Depository Trust Company, New York, New York (“DTC”), and the Series B Bonds shall be registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee for DTC. The Series B Bonds shall be initially executed and delivered in the form of a single fully registered Series B Bond for each maturity date of the Series B Bonds in the full aggregate principal amount of the Series B Bonds maturing on such date. The County, the Paying Agent and the District may treat DTC (or its nominee) as the sole and exclusive owner of the Series B Bonds registered in its name for all purposes of this resolution, and neither the County, the Paying Agent nor the District shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. The County, the Paying Agent and the District shall not have any responsibility or obligation to any participant of DTC (a “Participant”), any person claiming a beneficial ownership interest in the Series B Bonds under or through DTC or a Participant, or any other person which is not shown on the register of the District as being an owner, with respect to the accuracy of any records maintained by DTC or any Participant or the payment by DTC or any Participant by DTC or any Participant of any amount in respect of the principal or interest with respect to the Series B Bonds. The County and the District shall cause to be paid all principal and interest with respect to the Series B Bonds only to DTC, and all such payments shall be valid and effective to fully satisfy and discharge the District's obligations with respect to the principal and interest with respect to the Series B Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. Except under the conditions noted below, no person other than DTC shall receive a Series B Bond. Upon delivery by DTC to the District of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the term “Cede & Co.” in this resolution shall refer to such new nominee of DTC. If the District determines that it is in the best interest of the beneficial owners that they be able to obtain Series B Bonds and delivers a written certificate to DTC and the County to that effect, DTC shall notify the Participants of the availability through DTC of Series B Bonds. In such event, the County shall issue, transfer and exchange Series B Bonds as requested by DTC and any other owners in appropriate amounts. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Series B Bonds at any time by giving notice to the District and the County and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. Under such circumstances (if there is no successor securities depository), the County shall be obligated to deliver Series B Bonds as described in this resolution. Whenever DTC requests the District and the County to do so, the District and the County will cooperate with DTC in taking appropriate action after reasonable notice to (a) make available one or more separate Series B Bonds evidencing the Series B Bonds to any DTC Participant having Series B Bonds credited to its DTC account or (b) arrange for another securities depository to maintain custody of certificates evidencing the Series B Bonds. Notwithstanding any other provision of this resolution to the contrary, so long as any Series B Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, all payments with respect to the principal and interest with respect to such Series B Bond and all notices with respect to such Series B Bond shall be made and given, respectively, to DTC as provided as in the representation letter delivered on the date of issuance of the Series B Bonds. Section 11. Establishment of Funds and Accounts; Delivery of Series B Bonds; Disposition of Proceeds of the Series B Bonds. (a) Establishment of Funds and Accounts. (i) Building Fund. A fund, to be known as the “Pittsburg Unified School District, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Series B (2009), Building Fund” (the “Building Fund”), is hereby created and established within the County Treasury, which fund shall be accounted for separate and distinct from all other District and County funds. Moneys deposited therein shall be used solely for the purpose for which the Series B Bonds are being issued and shall be applied solely to authorized purposes which relate to the acquisition or improvement of real property. The interest earned on the moneys deposited to the Building Fund shall be retained in the Building Fund and used for the purposes thereof. Moneys held in the Building Fund shall be invested by the County in any one or more investments generally permitted to school districts under the laws of the State of California, consistent with the investment policy of the County and this resolution (the “Building Fund Permitted Investments”). The Building Fund Permitted Investments shall specifically include: (A) the County Pooled Investment Fund and (B) at the request of the District, (1) the Local Agency Investment Fund maintained by the Treasurer of the State of California; (2) other investments permitted under section 53601 of the California Government Code; and (3) investment agreements with financial institutions with senior unsecured credit ratings in one of the two highest rating categories (without regard to any refinement or gradation of such rating category by a plus or minus or a numeral) from one or more nationally recognized statistical rating organization then rating the Bonds. In regard to any investments requested by the District specified in clauses (B)(1), (B)(2) or (B)(3) above, the County may decline the request of the District upon any reasonable basis, including, specifically, any concerns of the County regarding the legality, structure or appropriateness of the investment vehicle generally or the process proposed for the bidding or the execution of the investment. Consent by the County to a request by the District to use any investments requested by the District specified in clauses (B)(1), (B)(2) or (B)(3) above shall in no way imply any endorsement by the County of such investment and the County assumes no liability for the results of such investment or of the provider thereof. (ii) Interest and Sinking Fund . A fund, to be known as the “Pittsburg Unified School District, General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2006, Interest and Sinking Fund” (the “Interest and Sinking Fund”), is hereby created and established within the County Treasury, which fund shall be accounted for separate and distinct from all other District and County funds. Moneys deposited therein shall be used only for payment of principal and interest on the Bonds. Any excess proceeds of the Series B Bonds not needed for the authorized purposes set forth herein for which the Series B Bonds are being issued shall be transferred to the Interest and Sinking Fund and applied to the payment of principal and interest on the Series B Bonds at the direction of the District. If, after payment in full of the Series B Bonds, there remain excess proceeds, any such excess amounts shall be transferred to the general fund of the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 11, any excess proceeds of the Series B Bonds not needed for the authorized purposes set forth herein for which the Series B Bonds are being issued shall be applied solely in a manner which is consistent with the requirements of applicable state and federal tax law, including but not limited to the requirements of federal tax law (if any) relating to the yield at which such proceeds are permitted to be invested. Moneys held in the Interest and Sinking Fund shall be invested by the County in the County Pooled Investment Fund. (b) Delivery of Series B Bonds. The proper officials of the District shall cause the Series B Bonds to be prepared and, following their sale, shall have the Series B Bonds signed and delivered, together with a true transcript of proceedings with reference to the issuance of the Series B Bonds, to the original purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in funds which are immediately available to the Paying Agent. (c) Disposition of Proceeds of the Series B Bonds. On the date of delivery of the Series B Bonds (the “Closing Date”), the proceeds of sale of the Series B Bonds shall be paid by the original purchaser to the Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County. The Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County shall deposit such amounts as follows: (i) An amount equal to the premium, if any, paid by the original purchaser shall be deposited in the Interest and Sinking Fund; and (ii) The remaining amounts shall be deposited in the Building Fund. The Underwriter has agreed to pay costs of issuance in an amount up to $130,000. To the extent that costs of issuance result in an amount less than $130,000 but the Underwriter nonetheless elects to pay to the District the difference between $130,000 and the actual amount of costs of issuance, such excess amount shall constitute premium received from the Underwriter and shall be paid to the Treasurer-Tax Collector of the County for deposit in the Interest and Sinking Fund. (d) Unclaimed Moneys. Any money held in any fund or account created pursuant to this resolution, or by the Paying Agent in trust, for the payment of the principal of, redemption premium, if any, or interest on the Series B Bonds remaining unclaimed for two years after the principal of all of the Series B Bonds has become due and payable (whether by maturity or upon prior redemption), shall be transferred to the Interest and Sinking Fund for the payment of any outstanding bonds of the District payable from said fund; or, if no such bonds of the District are at such time outstanding, said moneys shall be transferred to the general fund of the District as provided and permitted by law. Section 12. Source of Payment. There shall be levied by the County on all the taxable property in the District, in addition to all other taxes, a continuing direct and ad valorem tax annually during the period the Series B Bonds are outstanding in an amount sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the Series B Bonds when due, which moneys when collected will be placed in the Interest and Sinking Fund of the District, which fund is irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of and interest on the Series B Bonds when and as the same fall due. The moneys in the Interest and Sinking Fund, to the extent necessary to pay the principal of and interest on the Series B Bonds as the same become due and payable, shall be transferred by the County to the Paying Agent, as paying agent for the Series B Bonds, as necessary to pay the principal of and interest on the Series B Bonds. Section 13. Defeasance. The Series B Bonds may be defeased prior to maturity in the following ways: (a) Cash: By irrevocably depositing with a bank or trust company, in escrow, an amount of cash which, together with amounts then on deposit in the Debt Service Fund, is sufficient to pay all Series B Bonds Outstanding, including all Principal and interest and premium, if any; or (b) Defeasance Securities : By irrevocably depositing with a bank or trust company, in escrow, noncallable Defeasance Securities, permitted under section 149(d) of the Code thereto together with cash, if required, in such amount as will, in the opinion of an independent certified public accountant, together with interest to accrue thereon and monies then on deposit in the Debt Service Fund, together with the interest to accrue thereon, be fully sufficient to pay and discharge all Series B Bonds (including all Principal and interest represented thereby and redemption premiums, if any) at or before their maturity date; then, notwithstanding that any Series B Bonds shall not have been surrendered for payments, all obligations of the District and the County with respect to all Outstanding Series B Bonds shall cease and terminate, except only the obligation of the Paying Agent to pay or cause to be paid from funds deposited pursuant to paragraphs (a) or (b) of this Section 13, to the Owners of the Series B Bonds not so surrendered and paid all sums due with respect thereto. For purposes of this Section 13 and Section 14, “Defeasance Securities” shall mean: Direct and general obligations of the United States of America, or obligations that are unconditionally guaranteed as to principal and interest by the United States of America, including (in the case of direct and general obligations of the United States of America) evidence of direct ownership or proportionate interests in future interest or principal payments of such obligations. Investments in such proportionate interests must be limited to circumstances wherein (a) a bank or trust company acts as custodian and holds the underlying United States Obligations; (b) the owner of the investment is the real party in interest and has the right to proceed directly and individually against the obligor of the underlying Defeasance Securities; and (c) the underlying Defeasance Securities are held in a special account, segregated from the custodian’s general assets, and are not available to satisfy any claims of the custodian, any person claiming through the custodian, or any person to whom the custodian may be obligated; provided that such obligations are rated or assessed “AAA” by Standard & Poor’s if the Bonds are then rated by Standard & Poor’s, and “Aaa” by Moody’s Investors Service if the Bonds are then rated by Moody’s Investors Service. For purposes of this Section 13 and Section 14, the escrow agent bank and verification agent shall be selected by the District. Any such escrow bank or trust company shall conform to the successor paying agent requirements hereof. All costs for defeasance of the Series B Bonds shall be paid by the District. Section 14. Partial Defeasance. A portion of the then-Outstanding maturities of the Series B Bonds may be defeased prior to maturity in the following ways: (a) Cash: by irrevocably depositing with a bank or trust company, in escrow, an amount of cash which, together with amounts then on deposit in the Debt Service Fund, is sufficient to pay the designated Outstanding maturities of Series B Bonds, including all Principal and interest and premium, if any; or (b) Defeasance Securities : By irrevocably depositing with a bank or trust company, in escrow, noncallable Defeasance Securities, permitted under section 149(d) of the Code thereto together with cash, if required, in such amount as will, in the opinion of an independent certified public accountant, together with interest to accrue thereon, be fully sufficient to pay and discharge all Series B Bonds (including all Principal and interest represented thereby and redemption premiums, if any) at or before their maturity date; then, notwithstanding that any of such designated maturities of Series B Bonds shall not have been surrendered for payment, all obligations of the District and the County with respect to such Outstanding maturities of Series B Bonds shall cease and terminate, except only the obligation of the Paying Agent to pay or cause to be paid from funds deposited pursuant to paragraphs (a) or (b) of this Section 14, to the Owners of the Series B Bonds of such maturities designated for redemption not so surrendered and paid all sums due with respect thereto. Section 15. Necessary Acts and Conditions. This Board determines that all acts and conditions necessary to be performed by the Board precedent to and in the issuing of the Series B Bonds in order to make them legal, valid and binding general obligations of the District have been performed and have been met, or will at the time of delivery of the Series B Bonds have been performed and have been met, in regular and due form as required by law; that the full faith and credit of the District are pledged for the timely payment of the principal of and interest on the Series B Bonds; and that no statutory or constitutional limitation of indebtedness or taxation will have been exceeded in the issuance of the Series B Bonds. Section 16. Approval of Actions. Officers of the Board and County officials and staff are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all documents which they may deem necessary or advisable in order to proceed with the issuance of the Series B Bonds and otherwise carry out, give effect to and comply with the terms and intent of this resolution. Such actions heretofore taken by such officers, officials and staff are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved. Section 17. Limited Liability . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in the Series B Bonds or in any other document mentioned herein, neither the County nor the Board shall have any liability hereunder or by reason hereof or in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby and the Series B Bonds shall be payable solely from the moneys of the District available therefor as set forth in Section 12 hereof. Section 18. Indemnification of County. The County acknowledges and relies upon the fact that the District has represented that it shall indemnify and hold harmless, to the extent permitted by law, the County and its officers and employees (“Indemnified Parties”), against any and all losses, claims, damages or liabilities, joint or several, to which such Indemnified Parties may become subject because of action or inaction related to the adoption of this resolution, or related to the proceedings for sale, award, issuance and delivery of the Series B Bonds in accordance herewith and with the District’s resolution and that the District shall also reimburse any such Indemnified Parties for any legal or other expenses incurred in connection with investigating or defending any such claims or actions. Section 19. Limited Responsibility for Official Statement. Neither the Board nor any officer of the County has prepared or reviewed the official statement of the District describing the Series B Bonds (the “Official Statement”), and the Board and the various officers of the County take no responsibility for the contents or distribution thereof; provided, however, that solely with respect to a section contained or to be contained therein describing the County’s investment policy, current portfolio holdings, and valuation procedures, as they may relate to funds of the District held by the County Treasurer, the County Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and review such information for inclusion in the Official Statement and in a preliminary Official Statement, and to certify in writing prior to or upon the issuance of the Series B Bonds that the information contained in such section does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading. Section 20. Certified Copy to Auditor-Controller. The Clerk of the Board is hereby directed to provide a certified copy of this resolution to the Auditor-Controller of Contra Costa County. Section 21. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. * * * * * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County held on the 24th day of February, 2009, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: _____________________________ Chair, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: By __________________________ Clerk, Board of Supervisors Exhibit B Page 1 EXHIBIT A FORM OF BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT [Sale Date] Board of Supervisors County of Contra Costa 625 Court Street, Room 103 Martinez, California 94553-1282 Governing Board Pittsburg Unified School District 2000 Railroad Avenue Pittsburg, California 94565 Ladies and Gentlemen: The undersigned (the “Underwriter”) offers to enter into this Bond Purchase Agreement (the “Bond Purchase Agreement”) with the Pittsburg Unified School District (the “District”) and the County of Contra Costa (the “County”), which, upon your acceptance hereof, will be binding upon the District, the County and the Underwriter. This offer is made subject to the written acceptance of this Bond Purchase Agreement by the District and the County, and delivery of such acceptance to us at or prior to 11:59 P.M., Pacific Standard Time, on the date hereof. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the hereinafter defined County Resolution. 1. Purchase and Sale of the Bonds. Upon the terms and conditions and in reliance upon the representations, warranties and agreements herein set forth, the Underwriter hereby agrees to purchase from the County for reoffering to the public, and the County hereby agrees to sell in the name and on behalf of the District to the Underwriter for such purpose, all (but not less than all) of $ in aggregate principal amount of the District’s General Obligation Bonds Election of 2006, Series B (2009) (the “Bonds”). The Underwriter shall purchase the Bonds at a price of $________ (representing the aggregate initial principal amount of the Bonds of $___________, plus net original issue premium of $_______, less Underwriter’s discount of $_________ and less amounts retained by the Underwriter to pay costs of issuance of $___________). 2. The Bonds. The Bonds shall be dated their date of delivery. The Bonds shall mature on the dates and in the amounts shown on Exhibit A hereto, and shall bear interest at the rates shown on Exhibit A hereto payable on each February 1 and August 1, commencing February 1, 2010. The Bonds shall be subject to redemption as described in Exhibit A hereto. The Bonds shall otherwise be as described in, and shall be issued and secured pursuant to the provisions of, the Resolution of the Governing Board of t he District adopted on January 28, 2009 (the “District Resolution”), the Resolution of the Board of Supervisors of the County adopted on February 24, 2009 (the “County Resolution” and, together with the District Resolution, the “Resolutions”), the Official Statement (defined below), and certain provisions of the California Government Code (the “Act”). The Bonds shall be executed and delivered under and in accordance with the provisions of this Bond Purchase Agreement and the Resolutions. The Bonds shall be in book-entry form, shall bear CUSIP numbers, shall be in fully registered form, registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of The Exhibit B Page 2 Depository Trust Company, New York, New York; the Bonds shall initially be in authorized denominations of $5,000 principal or maturity value each, as applicable, or any integral multiple thereof. 3. Use of Documents. The District hereby authorizes the Underwriter to use, in connection with the offer and sale of the Bonds, this Bond Purchase Agreement, an Official Stateme nt, the Continuing Disclosure Certificate (defined herein), the Resolutions and all information contained herein and therein and all of the documents, certificates or statements furnished by the District or the County to the Underwriter in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Bond Purchase Agreement. The District Resolution, Bond Purchase Agreement, Continuing Disclosure Certificate, and Official Statement are collectively referred to as the “Legal Documents.” 4. Public Offering of the Bonds. The Underwriter agrees to make a bona fide public offering of all the Bonds at the initial public offering prices or yields to be set forth on the inside cover page of the Official Statement. Subsequent to such initial public offering, the Underwriter reserves the right to change such initial public offering prices or yields as it deems necessary in connection with the marketing of the Bonds. 5. Review of Official Statement. The Underwriter hereby represents that it has received and reviewed the Preliminary Official Statement with respect to the Bonds, dated ________ __, 2009 (the “Preliminary Official Statement”). The District represents that it deems the Preliminary Official Statement to be final, except for either revision or addition of the offering price(s), interest rate(s), yield(s) to maturity, selling compensation, aggregate principal amount, principal amount per maturity, delivery date, rating(s) and other terms of the Bonds which depend upon the foregoing as provided in and pursuant to Rule l5c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Rule”). The Underwriter agrees that prior to the time the final Official Statement relating to the Bonds is available, the Underwriter will send to any potential purchaser of the Bonds, upon the request of such potential purchaser, a copy of the most recent Preliminary Official Statement. Such Preliminary Official Statement shall be sent by first class mail (or other equally prompt means, including e lectronic mail) not later than the first business day following the date upon which each such request is received. 6. Closing. At 8:00 A.M., California Time, on March 24, 2009, or at such other time or on such other date as shall have been mutually agreed upon by you and us (the “Closing”), you will deliver to us, at the offices of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) in New York, New York, or at such other place as we may mutually agree upon, the Bonds in fully registered book-entry form, duly executed and registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, and at the offices of Quint & Thimmig LLP (“Bond Counsel”) in San Francisco, California, the other documents hereinafter mentioned; and we will accept such delivery and pay the purchase price thereof in immediately available funds by check, draft or wire transfer to or upon the order of the District. 7. Representations, Warranties and Agreements of the District. The District hereby represents, warrants and agrees with the Underwriter that: (a) Due Organization. The District is a school district duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California, with the power to issue the Bonds pursuant to the Act. (b) Due Authorization. (i) At or prior to the Closing, the District will have taken all action required to be taken by it to authorize the issuance and delivery of the Bonds; (ii) the District has full legal right, power and authority to enter into this Bond Purchase Agreement, to adopt the District Resolution, to perform its obligations under each such document or instrument, and to carry out and effectuate the transactions contemplated by this Bond Purchase Agreement and the Resolutions; (iii) the execution and Exhibit B Page 3 delivery or adoption of, and the performance by the District of the obligations contained in, the Bonds and the Legal Documents have been duly authorized and such authorization shall be in full force and effect at the time of the Closing; (iv) this Bond Purchase Agreement constitutes a valid and legally binding obligation of the District; and (v) the District has duly authorized the consummation by it of all transactions contemplated by this Bond Purchase Agreement. (c) Consents. No consent, approval, authorization, order, filing, registration, qualification, election or referendum, of or by any court or governmental agency or public body whatsoever is required in connection with the issuance, delivery or sale of the Bonds or the consummation of the other transactions effected or contemplated herein or hereby, except for such actions as may be necessary to qualify the Bonds for offer and sale under the Blue Sky or other securities laws and regulations of such states and jurisdictions of the United States as the Underwriter may reasonably request, or which have not been taken or obtained; provided, however, that the District shall not be required to subject itself to service of process in any jurisdiction in which it is not so subject as of the date hereof. (d) Internal Revenue Code. The District has complied with the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, with respect to the Bonds. (e) No Conflicts. To the best knowledge of the District, the issuance of the Bonds, and the execution, delivery and performance of this Bond Purchase Agreement, the District Resolution and the Bonds, and the compliance with the provisions hereof and thereof, do not conflict with or constitute on the part of the District a violation of or default under, the Constitution of the State of California or any existing law, charter, ordinance, regulation, decree, order or resolution and do not conflict with or result in a violation or breach of, or constitute a default under, any agreement, indenture, mortgage, lease or other instrument to which the District is a party or by which it is bound or to which it is subject. (f) Litigation. As of the time of acceptance hereof, no action, suit, proceeding, hearing or investigation is pending or, to the best knowledge of the District, threatened against the District: (i) in any way affecting the existence of the District or in any way challenging the respective powers of the several offices or of the titles of the officials of the District to such offices; or (ii) seeking to restrain or enjoin the sale, issuance or delivery of any of the Bonds, the application of the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds, or the collection of revenues or assets of the District pledged or to be pledged or available to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds, or the pledge thereof, or the levy of any taxes contemplated by the Resolutions or in any way contesting or affecting the validity or enforceability of the Bonds or the Legal Documents or contesting the powers of the District or its authority with respect to the Bonds or the Legal Documents; or (iii) in which a final adverse decision could (A) materially adversely affect the operations of the District or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Legal Documents, (B) declare this Bond Purchase Agreement to be invalid or unenforceable in whole or in material p art, or (C) adversely affect the exclusion of the interest paid on the Bonds from gross income for federal income tax purposes and the exemption of such interest from California personal income taxation. (g) No Other Debt. Between the date hereof and the Closing, without the prior written consent of the Underwriter, no bonds, notes or other obligations for borrowed money will be issued in the name and on behalf of the District, except for such borrowings as may be described in or contemplated by the Official Statement. (h) Arbitrage Certificate. The District has not been notified of any listing or proposed listing by the Internal Revenue Service to the effect that the District is a bond issuer whose arbitrage certificates may not be relied upon. Exhibit B Page 4 (i) Certificates. Any certificates signed by any officer of the District and delivered to the Underwriter shall be deemed a representation and warranty by the District to the Underwriter, but not by the person signing the same, as to the statements made therein. (j) Continuing Disclosure. At or prior to the Closing, the District shall have duly authorized, executed and delivered a continuing disclosure certificate (the “Continuing Disclosure Certificate”). The Continuing Disclosure Certificate shall comply with the provisions of the Rule and be substantially in the form attached to the Preliminary Official Statement and Official Statement as Appendix C. (k) Official Statement Accurate and Complete . The Preliminary Official Statement was as of its date, and the Official Statement is, and at all times subsequent to the date of the Official Statement up to and including the Closing will be, true and correct in all material respects, and the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement contain and up to and including the Closing will contain no misstatement of any material fact and do not, and up to and including the Closing will not, omit any statement necessary to make the statements contained therein, in the light of the circumstances in which such statements were made, not misleading. 8. Representations, Warranties and Agreements of the County. The County hereby represents, warrants and agrees with the Underwriter that: (a) Due Organization. The County is a political subdivision duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California, with the power to issue the Bonds pursuant to the Act. (b) Due Authorization. (i) At or prior to the Closing, the County will have taken all action required to be taken by it to authorize the issuance and delivery of the Bonds; (ii) the County has full legal right, power and authority to enter into this Bond Purchase Agreement, to adopt the County Resolution, to issue and deliver the Bonds to the Underwriter on behalf of the District and to perform its obligations under each such document or instrument, and to carry out and effectuate the transactions contemplated by this Bond Purchase Agreement and the Resolutions; (iii) the execution and delivery or adoption of, and the performance by the County of the obligations contained in the Bonds, the County Resolution and this Bond Purchase Agreement have been duly authorized and such authorization shall be in full force and effect at the time of the Closing; (iv) this Bond Purchase Agreement constitutes a valid and legally binding obligation of the County; and (v) the County has duly authorized the consummation by it of all transactions contemplated by this Bond Purchase Agreement. (c) Consents. No consent, approval, authorization, order, filing, registration, qualification, election or referendum, of or by any court or governmental agency or public body whatsoever is required in connection with the issuance, delivery or sale of the Bonds or the consummation of the other transactions effected or contemplated herein or hereby, except for such actions as may be necessary to qualify the Bonds for offer and sale under the Blue Sky or other securities laws and regulations of such states and jurisdictions of the United States as the Underwriter may reasonably request, or which have not been taken or obtained; provided, however, that the County shall not be required to subject itself to service of process in any jurisdiction in which it is not so subject as of the date hereof. (d) No Conflicts. To the best knowledge of the County, the issuance of the Bonds, the execution, delivery and performance of this Bond Purchase Agreement, the County Resolution and the Bonds, and the compliance with the provisions hereof do not conflict with or constitute on the part of the County a violation of or default under, the Constitution of the State of California or any existing law, charter, ordinance, regulation, decree, order or resolution and do not conflict with or result in a violation or breach of, or constitute a default under, any agreement, indenture, mortgage, lease or other instrument to which the County is a party or by which it is bound or to which it is subject. Exhibit B Page 5 (e) Litigation. As of the time of acceptance hereof, based on the advice of County Counsel, no action, suit, proceeding, hearing or investigation is pending or, to the best knowledge of the County, threatened against the County: (i) in any way affecting the existence of the County or in any way challenging the respective powers of the several offices or of the titles of the officials of the County to such offices; or (ii) seeking to restrain or enjoin the sale, issuance or delivery of any of the Bonds, or the levy of any taxes contemplated by the Resolutions, or in any way contesting or affecting the validity or enforceability of the Bonds, this Bond Purchase Agreement or the County Resolution or contesting the powers of the County or its authority with respect to the Bonds, the County Resolution or this Bond Purchase Agreement; or (iii) in which a final adverse decision could (a) materially adversely affect the operations of the County or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Bond Purchase Agreement or the Resolutions, (b) declare this Bond Purchase Agreement to be invalid or unenforceable in whole or in material part, or (c) adversely affect the exclusion of the interest paid on the Bonds from gross income for federal income tax purposes and the exemption of such interest from California personal income taxation. (f) No Other Debt. Between the date hereof and the Closing, without the prior written consent of the Underwriter, the County will not have issued in the name and on behalf of the District any bonds, notes or other obligations for borrowed money except for such borrowings as may be described in or contemplated by the Official Statement. (g) Certificates. Any certificates signed by any officer of the County and delivered to the Underwriter shall be deemed a representation and warranty by the County to the Underwriter, but not by the person signing the same, as to the statements made therein. 9. Covenants of the County and the District. The County and the District respectively covenant and agree with the Underwriter that: (a) Securities Laws. The County and the District will furnish such information, execute such instruments, and take such other action in cooperation with the Underwriter if and as the Underwriter may reasonably request in order to qualify the Bonds for offer and sale under the Blue Sky or other securities laws and regulations or such states and jurisdictions, provided, however, that the County and the District shall not be required to consent to service of process in any jurisdiction in which they are not so subject as of the date hereof. (b) Application of Proceeds. The District will apply the proceeds from the sale of the Bonds for the purposes specified in the Resolutions and the final Official Statement. (c) Official Statement. The District hereby agrees to deliver or cause to be delivered (and the County agrees to cooperate with the District in connection with such delivery) to the Underwriter, not later than the seventh (7th) business day following the date this Bond Purchase Agreement is signed, copies of a final Official Statement substantially in the form of the Preliminary Official Statement, with only such changes therein as shall have been accepted by the Underwriter, the County and the District (such Official Statement with such changes, if any, and including the cover page and all appendices, exhibits, maps, reports and statements included therein or attached thereto being herein called the “Official Statement”) in such quantities as may be requested by the Underwriter not later than five (5) business days following the date this Bond Purchase Agreement is signed, in order to permit the Underwriter to comply with paragraph (b)(4) of the Rule and with the rules of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The District hereby authorizes the Underwriter to use and distribute the Official Statement in connection with the offering and sale of the Bonds. (d) Subsequent Events. The County and the District hereby agree to notify the Underwriter of any event or occurrence that may affect the accuracy or completeness of any information set forth in the Exhibit B Page 6 Official Statement relating to the County or the District, respectively, until the date which is ninety (90) days following the Closing. (e) References. References herein to the Preliminary Official Statement and the final Official Statement include the cover page and all appendices, exhibits, maps, reports and statements included therein or attached thereto. (f) Amendments to Official Statement. For a period of ninety (90) days after the Closing or until such time (if earlier) as the Underwriter shall no longer hold any of the Bonds for sale, the District will not adopt any amendment of or supplement to the Official Statement to which, after having been furnished with a copy, the Underwriter shall object in writing or which shall be disapproved by the Underwriter; and if any event relating to or affecting the District shall occur as a result of which it is necessary, in the opinion of the Underwriter, to amend or supplement the Official Statement in order to make the Official Statement not misleading in light of the circumstances existing at the time it is delivered to a purchaser, forthwith prepare and furnish (at the expense of the District) a reasonable number of copies of an amendment of or supplement to the Official Statement (in form and substance satisfactory to the Underwriter) which will amend or supplement the Official Statement so that it will not contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances existing at the time the Official Statement is delivered to a purchaser, not misleading. 10. Conditions to Closing. The Underwriter has entered into this Bond Purchase Agreement in reliance upon the representations and warranties of the County and the District cont ained herein and the performance by the County and the District of their respective obligations hereunder, both as of the date hereof and as of the date of Closing. The Underwriter’s obligations under this Bond Purchase Agreement are and shall be subject at the option of the Underwriter, to the following further conditions at the Closing: (a) Representations True. The representations and warranties of the County and the District contained herein shall be true, complete and correct in all material respects at the date hereof and at and as of the Closing, as if made at and as of the Closing, and the statements made in all certificates and other documents delivered to the Underwriter at the Closing pursuant hereto shall be true, complete and correct in all material respects on the date of the Closing; and the County and the District shall be in compliance with each of the agreements made by it in this Bond Purchase Agreement. (b) Obligations Performed. At the time of the Closing, (i) the Legal Documents and the Resolutions shall be in full force and effect and shall not have been amended, modified or supplemented except as may have been agreed to in writing by us; (ii) all actions under the Act which, in the opinion of Bond Counsel, shall be necessary in connection with the transactions contemplated hereby, shall have been duly taken and shall be in full force and effect; and (iii) the District and the County shall perform or have performed all of its obligations required under the Legal Documents to be performe d at or prior to the Closing. (c) Adverse Rulings. No decision, ruling or finding shall have been entered by any court or governmental authority since the date of this Bond Purchase Agreement (and not reversed on appeal or otherwise set aside), or to the best knowledge of the County or the District, pending or threatened which has any of the effects describe in Section 7(f) or Section 8(e) hereof or contesting in any way the completeness or accuracy of the Official Statement. (d) Marketability. Between the date hereof and the Closing, the market price or marketability or the ability of the Underwriter to enforce contracts for the sale of the Bonds, at the initial offering prices set forth in the Official Statement, of the Bonds shall not have been material ly adversely affected in the Exhibit B Page 7 judgment of the Underwriter (evidenced by a written notice to the County and the District terminating the obligation of the Underwriter to accept delivery of and pay for the Bonds) by reason of any of the following: (i) legislation enacted or introduced in the Congress or recommended for passage by the President of the United States, or a decision rendered by a court established under Article III of the Constitution of the United States or by the United States Tax Court, or an order, ruling, regulation (final, temporary or proposed) or official statement issued or made: (A) by or on behalf of the United States Treasury Department, or by or on behalf of the Internal Revenue Service, with the purpose or effect, directly or indire ctly, of causing inclusion in gross income for purposes of federal income taxation of the interest received by the owners of the Bonds; or (B) by or on behalf of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction over the subject matter thereof, to the effect that the Bonds, or obligations of the general character of the Bonds, including any and all underlying arrangements, are not exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended; (ii) the declaration of war or engagement in major military hostilities by the United States or the occurrence of any other national emergency or calamity relating to the effective operation of the government or the financial community in the United States; (iii) the declaration of a general banking moratorium by federal, New York or California authorities, or the general suspension of trading on any national securities exchange; (iv) the imposition by the New York Stock Exchange, other national securities exchange, or any governmental authority, of any material restrictions not now in force with respect to the Bonds, or obligations of the general character of the Bonds, or securities generally, or the material increase of any such restrictions now in force, including those relating to the extension of credit by, or the charge to the net capital requirements of, the Underwriter; (v) an order, decree or injunction of any court of competent jurisdiction, or order, filing, regulation or official statement by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction over the subject matter thereof, issued or made to the effect that the issuance, offering or sale of obligations of the general character of the Bonds, or the issuance, offering or sale of the Bonds, as contemplated hereby or by the Official Statement, is or would be in violation of the federal securities laws, as amended and then in effect; (vi) the withdrawal or downgrading of any rating of the District’s outstanding indebtedness by a national rating agency; or (vii) any event occurring, or information becoming known which, in the reasonable judgment of the Underwriter, makes untrue in any material adverse respect any statement or information contained in the Official Statement, or has the effect that the Official Statement contains any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements made therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. Exhibit B Page 8 (e) Delivery of Documents. At or prior to the date of the Closing, the Underwriter shall receive two copies of the following documents in each case dated as of the Closing Date and satisfactory in form and substance to the Underwriter: (i) Bond Opinion. An approving opinion of Bond Counsel, as to the validity and tax - exempt status of the Bonds, dated the date of the Closing, in substantially the form set forth in the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement as Appendix A; (ii) Reliance Letter. A reliance letter from Bond Counsel to the effect that the Underwriter can rely upon the approving opinion described in (e)(i) above; (iii) Supplemental Opinion of Bond Counsel. A supplemental opinion of Bond Counsel addressed to the Underwriter, in form and substance acceptable to the Underwriter, dated as of the Closing Date, substantially to the following effect: (A) the description of the Bonds and the security for the Bonds and statements in the Official Statement on the cover page thereof and under the captions “INTRODUCTION,” “THE BONDS,” “SECURITY FOR THE BONDS,” “CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY LIMITATIONS ON TAXES AND APPROPRIATIONS,” and “TAX MATTERS,” to the extent they purport to summarize certain provisions of the Resolutions, the Continuing Disclosure Certificate and California law or federal law, fairly and accurately summarize the matters purported to be summarized therein; provided that Bond Counsel need not express any opinion with respect to any financial or statistical data, information concerning The Depository Trust Company or related to its book-entry only system, or any information concerning the Insurer or the Policy (as such terms are defined in the Official Statement) contained therein; (B) assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by all the parties thereto, the Continuing Disclosure Certificate and this Bond Purchase Agreement have each been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the District and constitute legal, valid and binding agreements of the District and are enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, except as enforcement thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or other laws relating to or affecting generally the enforcement of creditors’ rights and except as their enforcement may be subject to the application of equitable principles and the exercise of judicial discretion in appropriate cases if equitable remedies are sought; and (C) the Bonds are exempt from registration pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Resolutions are exempt from qualification as an indenture pursuant to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended. (iv) Certificates. A certificate signed by the appropriate officials of the County and the District to the effect that (A) such officials are authorized to execute this Bond Purchase Agreement, (B) the representations, agreements and warranties of the County and the District herein are true and correct in all material respects as of the date of Closing, (C) the County and the District have complied with all the terms of the Legal Documents and the Resolutions to be complied with by the County and the District prior to or concurrently with the Closing and such documents are in full force and effect, (D) with respect to the District, such District official has reviewed the Official Statement and on such basis certifies that the Official Statement does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances in which they were made, not misleading, Exhibit B Page 9 and (E) the Bonds being delivered on the date of the Closing to the Underwriter under this Bond Purchase Agreement substantially conform to the descriptions thereof contained in the Resolutions; (v) Arbitrage. A nonarbitrage certificate of the District in form satisfactory to Bond Counsel; (vi) Rating. Evidence satisfactory to the Underwriter that the Bonds shall have been rated “____” by Standard & Poor’s and that such rating has not been revoked or downgraded; (vii) District Resolution. A certificate, together with fully executed copies of the District Resolution, of the Secretary of the District Board of Trustees to the effect that: (A) such copies are true and correct copies of the District Resolution; and (B) that the District Resolution was duly adopted and has not been modified, amended, rescinded or revoked and is in full force and effect on the date of the Closing. (viii) County Resolution. A certificate, together with fully executed copies of the County Resolution, of the Clerk of the County Board of Supervisors to the effect that: (A) such copies are true and correct copies of the County Resolution; and (B) that the County Resolution was duly adopted and has not been modified, amended, rescinded or revoked and is in full force and effect on the date of the Closing. (ix) County Counsel Opinion. An opinion of Counsel to the County in the form attached hereto as Appendix B; (x) Official Statement. A certificate of the appropriate official of the District evidencing his or her determinations respecting the Preliminary Official Statement in accordance with the Rule; (xi) Continuing Disclosure Certificate. An executed copy of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate, substantially in the form presented in the Official Statement as Appendix C thereto; and (xii) Other Documents. Such additional legal opinions, certificates, proceedings, instruments and other documents as the Underwriter may reasonably request to evidence compliance (A) by the County and the District with legal requirements, (B) the truth and accuracy, as of the time of Closing, of the representations of the County and the District herein contained and of the Official Statement, and (C) the due performance or satisfaction by the County and the District at or prior to such time of all agreements then to be performed and all conditions then to be satisfied by the County and the District, respectively. (f) Termination. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein contained, if for any reason whatsoever the Bonds shall not have been delivered by the District to the Underwriter prior to the close of business, California Time, on November __, 2008, then the obligation to purchase Bond s hereunder shall terminate and be of no further force or effect except with respect to the obligations of the District and the Underwriter under Section 12 hereof. Exhibit B Page 10 If the County or the District shall be unable to satisfy the conditions to the Underwriter ’s obligations contained in this Bond Purchase Agreement or if the Underwriter’s obligations shall be terminated for any reason permitted by this Bond Purchase Agreement, this Bond Purchase Agreement may be cancelled by the Underwriter at, or at any time prior to, the time of Closing. Notice of such cancellation shall be given to the County and the District in writing, or by telephone or telegraph, confirmed in writing. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the performance of any and all obligations of the County and the District hereunder and the performance of any and all conditions contained herein for the benefit of the Underwriter may be waived by the Underwriter in writing at its sole discretion. 11. Conditions to Obligations of the County and the District. The performance by the County and the District of their respective obligations is conditioned upon (a) the performance by the Underwriter of its obligations hereunder; and (b) receipt by the District and the Underwriter of opinions a nd certificates being delivered at the Closing by persons and entities other than the County and the District. 12. Expenses. To the extent that the transactions contemplated by this Bond Purchase Agreement are consummated, the Underwriter shall pay costs of issuance of the Bonds in an amount not to exceed $_____________, including but not limited to the following: (a) the cost of the preparation and reproduction of the Resolutions; (b) the fees and disbursements of Bond Counsel; (c) the cost of the preparation and delivery of the Bonds; (d) the fees, if any, for bond ratings, including all necessary travel expenses; (e) the cost of the printing and distribution of the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement; (f) the bond insurance premium; (g) the fees and expenses of the Financial Advisor; (h) the initial fees of the Paying Agent; and (i) all other fees and expenses incident to the issuance and sale of the Bonds. All costs of issuing the Bonds in excess of $________ shall be paid by the District. 13. Notices. Any notice or other communication to be given under this Bond Purchase Agreement (other than the acceptance hereof as specified in the first paragraph hereof) may be given by delivering the same in writing if to the District, to the Superintendent, Pittsburg Unified School District, 2000 Railroad Avenue, Pittsburg, California 94565, if to the County, to the Treasurer-Tax Collector, Contra Costa County, 625 Court Street, Room 103, Martinez, California 94553 -1282, or if to the Underwriter, to _______, ______, ______, California ____. 14. Parties in Interest; Survival of Representations and Warranties. This Bond Purchase Agreement when accepted by the District and the County in writing as heretofore specified shall constitute the entire agreement among the District, the County and the Underwriter. This Bond Purchase Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the District, the County and the Underwriter (including the successors or assigns of the Underwriter). No person shall acquire or have any rights hereunder or by virtue hereof. All representations, warranties and agreements of the District and the County in this Bond Purchase Agreement shall survive regardless of (a) any investigation or any statement in respect thereof made by or on behalf of the Underwriter, (b) delivery of and payment by the Underwriter for the Bonds hereunder, and (c) any termination of this Bond Purchase Agreement. 15. Severability. In the event any provision of this Bond Purchase Agreement shall be held invalid or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision hereof. 16. Nonassignment. Notwithstanding anything stated to the contrary herein, neither party hereto may assign or transfer its interest herein, or delegate or transfer any of its obligations hereunder, without the prior written consent of the other party hereto. Exhibit B Page 11 17. Entire Agreement. This Bond Purchase Agreement, when executed by the parties hereto, shall constitute the entire agreement of the parties hereto (including their permitted successors and assigns, respectively). 18. Execution in Counterparts. This Bond Purchase Agreement may be executed in several counterparts each of which shall be regarded as an original and all of which shall constitute but one and the same document. 19. Applicable Law. This Bond Purchase Agreement shall be interpreted, governed and enforced in accordance with the law of the State of California applicable to contracts made and performed in such State. Very truly yours, _________________________ By Title The foregoing is hereby agreed to and accepted as of the date first above written: PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT By Superintendent COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA By Treasurer-Tax Collector Exhibit B Page 12 APPENDIX A $__________ PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Contra Costa County, California) GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS ELECTION OF 2006, SERIES B (2009) Maturity Date (August 1) Principal Amount Interest Rate Yield Price Optional Redemption: The Bonds maturing on or before August 1, 20__ are not subject to redemption prior to their fixed maturity dates. The Bonds maturing on or after August 1, 20__ may be redeemed prior to their respective stated maturity dates at the option of the District, from any source of funds, on August 1, 20__ or on any date thereafter, as a whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount so called for redemption, without premium, together with interest accrued thereon to the date fixed for redemption. Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption: The Bonds maturing on August 1, 20__, are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption in part, by lot, prior to their respective stated maturity dates, at a redemption price equal to the pr incipal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon to the date fixed for redemption, without premium, on August 1, in the years and in the amounts specified below: Redemption Date Sinking Fund (August 1) Payment Exhibit B Page 13 APPENDIX B $__________ PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Contra Costa County, California) GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS ELECTION OF 2006, SERIES B (2009) Ladies and Gentlemen As counsel to the Board of Supervisors (the “Board”) of Contra Costa County, Califo rnia (the “County”), we have reviewed the Official Statement for the above-described bonds (the “Bonds”), and the Resolution of the Board adopted on February 24, 2009, with respect to the Bonds (the “County Resolution”). Having reviewed these documents, it is my opinion that: 1. The County is a political subdivision duly organized and existing pursuant to the Constitution and the laws of the State of California. 2. The County Resolution was duly adopted at a meeting of the governing body of the County which was called and held pursuant to law and with all public notice required by law and at which a quorum was present and acting throughout. 3. To our knowledge, there is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation at law or in equity before or by any court, public board or body, pending or threatened against or affecting the County, which would adversely impact the County’s ability to complete the transactions described in and contemplated by the Official Statement, to restrain or enjoin the levy or collection of tax revenues pledged for the Bonds or in any way contesting or affecting the validity of the County Resolution or the Bonds or the transactions described in and contemplated by the Official Statement wherein an unfavorable decision, ruling or finding would adversely affect the validity and enforceability of the County Resolution, or the Bonds or in which a final adverse decision could materially adversely affect the operations of the County. 4. To our knowledge, the obligations of the County under the Bonds, and the approval of the Official Statement and compliance with the provisions thereof, under the circumstances contemplated thereby, do not and will not in any material respect conflict with or constitute on the part of the County a breach of or default under any agreement or other instrument to which the County is a party or by which it is bound or any existing law, regulation, court order or consent decree to which the County is subject. Very truly yours, County Counsel Exhibit B Page 1 EXHIBIT B FORM OF SERIES B BONDS PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (Contra Costa County, California) GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS ELECTION OF 2006, SERIES B (2009) INTEREST RATE MATURITY DATE DATED DATE CUSIP _____% per annum August 1, ____ __________, 2009 _______ REGISTERED OWNER: CEDE & CO. PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: __________________________________ DOLLARS The Pittsburg Unified School District (the “District”) in Contra Costa County, California (the “County”), for value received, promises to pay to the Registered Owner named above, or registered assigns, the Principal Amount on the Maturity Date, each as stated above, and interest thereon, calculated on a 30/360 day basis, until the Principal Amount is paid or provided for at the Interest Rate stated above, such interest to be paid on February 1 and August 1 of each year (the “Interest Payment Dates”), commencing February 1, 2010. This Bond will bear interest from the Interest Payment Date next preceding the date of authentication hereof, unless (a) it is authenticated as of a business day following the 15th day of the month immediately preceding any Interest Payment Date and on or before such Interest Payment Date, in which event it shall bear interest from such Interest Payment Date, or (b) it is authenticated on or before January 15, 2010, in which event it shall bear interest from the Dated Date specified above. Principal, interest and redemption premium (if any) are payable in lawful money of the United States of America, without deduction for the paying agent services, to the person in whose name this Bond is registered (the “Registered Owner”) on the Register maintained by The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., San Francisco, California (the “Paying Agent”). Principal and any redemption premium is payable upon presentation and surrender of this Bond at the designated corporate trust office of the Paying Agent. Interest is payable by check or draft mailed by the Paying Agent on each Interest Payment Date to the registered owner of this Bond by first-class mail at the address appearing on the Register at the close of business on the 15th day of the calendar month next preceding that Interest Payment Date (the “Record Date”). This Bond is one of a series of $35,000,000 of Bonds issued to (a) f inance real property acquisition or improvements, namely: to build new classrooms at Pittsburg high schools, emphasize science, technology, and vocational rooms, separate ninth and tenth grade classrooms and facilities, upgrade cafeteria and library, renovate restrooms, and upgrade electrical and plumbing systems, and (b) to pay all necessary legal, financial, engineering and contingent costs in connection therewith. The Board hereby authorizes the issuance of the Series B Bonds, and the requisite fifty -five percent vote of the electors of the District cast at a special election held on November 7, 2006, upon the question of issuing Bonds in the amount of $85,000,000, and pursuant to the resolution of the Governing Board of the District adopted on January 28, 2009 (the “District Resolution”) and the resolution of the County Board of Supervisors adopted on February 24, 2009 (the “Bond Resolution”). This Bond and the issue of which this Bond is a Exhibit B Page 2 part are payable as to both principal and interest from the proceeds of the levy of ad valorem taxes on all property subject to such taxes in the District, which taxes are unlimited as to rate or amount. The Bonds of this issue are issuable only as fully registered Bonds in the denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof. This Bond is exchangeable and transferable for Bonds of other authorized denominations at the designated corporate trust office of the Paying Agent, by the Registered Owner or by a person legally empowered to do so, upon presentation and surrender hereof to the Paying Agent, together with a request for exchange or an assignment signed by the Registered Owner or by a person legally empowered to do so, in a form satisfactory to the Paying Agent, all subject to the terms, limitations and conditions provided in the Bond Resolution. Any tax or governmental charges shall be paid by the transferor. The District, the County and the Paying Agent may deem and treat the Registered Owner as the absolute owner of this Bond for the purpose of receiving pa yment of or on account of principal or interest and for all other purposes, and neither the District, the County nor the Paying Agent shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. The Series B Bonds maturing on or before August 1, ____, are not be subject to redemption prior to their respective stated maturities. The Series B Bonds maturing on or after August 1, ____, are subject to redemption prior to maturity, at the option of the District, from any available source of funds, on any date on or after August 1, ____, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof together with accrued interest thereon to the date fixed for redemption, without a premium. [If applicable:] The Bonds maturing on August 1, 20__ (the “Term Bonds”) are also subjec t to mandatory sinking fund redemption on August 1 in the years, and in the amounts, as set forth in the following table, at a redemption price equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed (without premium), together with interest accrued thereon to the date fixed for redemption; provided, however, that if some but not all of the Term Bonds have been redeemed pursuant to the preceding paragraph, the aggregate principal amount of Term Bonds to be redeemed under this paragraph shall be reduced on a pro rata basis in integral multiples of $5,000, as shall be designated pursuant to written notice filed by the District with the County and the Paying Agent. Redemption Date Principal August 1 Amount If less than all of the Bonds of any one maturity shall be called for redemption, the particular Bonds or portions of Bonds of such maturity to be redeemed shall be selected by lot by the District in such manner as the District in its discretion may determine; provided, however, that the portion of any Bond to be redeemed shall be in the principal amount of $5,000 or some multiple thereof and that, in selecting Bonds for redemption, the Paying Agent shall treat each Bond as representing that number of Bonds which is obtained by dividing the principal amount of such Bond by $5,000. If less than all of the Bonds shall be called for redemption, the particular Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed shall be called in the inverse order of their maturities, unless otherwise directed by the District. The Paying Agent shall give notice of the redemption of the Bonds at the expense of the District. Such notice shall specify: (a) that the Bonds or a designated portion thereof are to be redeemed, (b) the numbers and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed, (c) the date of notice and the date of redemption, (d) the place or places where the redemption will be made, and (e) descriptive information regarding the Bonds including the dated date, interest rate and stated maturity date. Such notice shall further state that on the specified date these shall become due and payable upon each Bond to be Exhibit B Page 3 redeemed, the portion of the principal amount of such Bond to be redeemed, together with interest accrued to said date, the redemption premium, if any, and that from and after such date interest with respect thereto shall cease to accrue and be payable. Notice of redemption shall be by registered or otherwise secured mail or delivery service, postage prepaid, to the registered owner of the Bonds, or if the original purchaser is a syndicate, to the managing member of such syndicate, to a municipal registered securities depository and to a national information service that disseminates securities redemption notices and, by first class mail, postage prepaid, to the District, the County and the respective Owners of any Bonds designated for redemption at their addresses appearing on the Bond registration books, in every case at least 30 days, but not more than 60 days, prior to the redemption date; provided that neither failure to receive such notice nor any defect in any notice so mailed shall affect the sufficiency of the proceedings for the redemption of such Bonds. Neither the District, the County nor the Paying Agent will be required: (a) to issue or transfer any Bond during a period beginning with the opening of business on the 15th calendar day next preceding either any Interest Payment Date or any date of selection of any Bond to be redeemed and ending with the close of business on the Interest Payment Date or a day on which the applicable notice of redemption is given, or (b) to transfer any Bond which has been selected or called for redemption in whole or in part Reference is made to the Bond Resolution for a more complete description of the prov isions, among others, with respect to the nature and extent of the security for the Bonds of this series, the rights, duties and obligations of the District, the County, the Paying Agent and the Registered Owners, and the terms and conditions upon which the Bonds are issued and secured. The owner of this Bond assents, by acceptance hereof, to all of the provisions of the Bond Resolution. It is certified and recited that all acts and conditions required by the Constitution and laws of the State of California to exist, to be performed or to have been met precedent to and in the issuing of the Bonds in order to make them legal, valid and binding general obligations of the District, have been performed and have been met in regular and due form as required by la w; that payment in full for the Bonds has been received; that no statutory or constitutional limitation on indebtedness or taxation has been exceeded in issuing the Bonds; and that due provision has been made for levying and collecting ad valorem property taxes on all of the taxable property within the District in an amount sufficient to pay principal and interest when due, and for levying and collecting such taxes the full faith and credit of the District are hereby pledged. This Bond shall be not be valid or obligatory for any purpose and shall not be entitled to any security or benefit under the Bond Resolution (described on the reverse hereof) until the Certificate of Authentication below has been manually signed by the Paying Agent. Unless this certificate is presented by an authorized representative of The Depository Trust Company to the issuer or its agent for registration of transfer, exchange or payment, and any certificate issued is registered in the name of Cede & Co. or such other name as requested by an authorized representative of The Depository Trust Company and any payment is made to Cede & Co., ANY TRANSFER, PLEDGE OR OTHER USE HEREOF FOR VALUE OR OTHERWISE BY OR TO ANY PERSON IS WRONGFUL since the registered owner hereof, Cede & Co., has an interest herein. Exhibit B Page 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Pittsburg Unified School District, Contra Costa C ounty, California, has caused this Bond to be executed on behalf of the District and in their official capacities by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Chair of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, the Clerk of said Board of Supervisors and the Treasurer-Tax Collector of Contra Costa County, and has caused the seal of the County to be affixed hereon, all as of the date stated above. [S E A L] CONTRA COSTA COUNTY By Chair of the Board of Supervisors By Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By Treasurer-Tax Collector CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This Bond is one of the Bonds described in the Bond Resolution referred to herein. Date of Authentication: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., as Paying Agent By Authorized Signatory Exhibit B Page 5 FORM OF ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned do(es) hereby sell, assign and transfer unto (Name, Address and Tax Identification or Social Security Number of Assignee) the within Bond and do(es) hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint , attorney, to transfer the same on the registration books of the Paying Agent, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: _______________ Signature Guaranteed: NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor. NOTICE: The signature(s) on this Assignment must correspond with the name(s) as written on the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Sheriff-Coroner, a purchase order with Allen Packaging Company in the amount of $125,000 to provide three-compartment trays for Seal-a-Meal food to be used at the West County, Martinez and Marsh Creek Detention Facilities. FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal Year 2008/09 Budgeted expenditure. $125,000 County General Fund. BACKGROUND: Allen Packaging supplies the packaging equipment and supplies used for the "Seal-A-Meal" food production system at the adult detention facility, wherein we utilize our central production kitchen at West County Detention Facility to produce inmate meals that are then distributed to two homeless shelters, and the Marsh Creek and Martinez Detention Facilities. This central production system has proven to increase our efficiency and substantially reduce our costs for mandated provided meals. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Frank Scudero (925) 335-1529 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Liz Arbuckle, Tim Ewell, Win Jamile C.99 To:Board of Supervisors From:Warren Rupf, Sheriff-Coroner Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:PURCHASE ORDER - ALLEN PACKAGING "SEAL-A-MEAL" THREE-COMPARTMENT DINING TRAYS RECOMMENDATION(S): CONTINUE the emergency action originally taken by the Board of Supervisors on November 16, 1999 regarding the issue of homelessness in Contra Costa County. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 8630 required that, for a body that meets weekly, the need to continue the emergency declaration be reviewed at least every 14 days until the local emergency is terminated. In no event is the review to take place more than 21 days after the previous review. On November 16, 1999, the Board of Supervisors declared a local emergency, pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 8630 on homelessness in Contra Costa County. With the continuing high number of homeless individuals and insufficient funding available to assist in sheltering all homeless individuals and families, it is appropriate for the APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dorothy Sansoe 335-1009 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.100 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Extension of Emergency Declaration Regarding Homelessness BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Board to continue the declaration of a local emergency regarding homelessness. RECOMMENDATION(S): ALLOCATE $1,000 in FY 2008/09 Keller Canyon Mitigation funds for administrative support and materials to conduct a Grant Writing Seminar as recommended by Supervisor Federal D. Glover. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact on the General Fund. Funding of $1,000 will be allocated from FY 2008/09 Keller Canyon mitigation funds. BACKGROUND: Supervisor Glover recommends that a Grant Writing Seminar be offered to Keller Canyon mitigation applicants and other east county agencies to enhance their ability to secure funding through an in-depth education of the grant process, including the revenue building tools necessary to write, budget and implement grants in the most beneficial manner possible at no cost to the organization. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Tonya Smith (925)427-8138 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Celicia Nelson, Deputy cc: Robert Calkins, Jim Kennedy, Auditor Controller C.101 To:Board of Supervisors From:Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:ALLOCATION OF KELLER CANYON MITIGATION FUNDS TO PAY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH A GRANT WRITING SEMINAR RECOMMENDATION(S): A. APPROVE Purchase and Sale Agreement and ACCEPT the Grant Deed from Richard B. Berrett and Geri L. Berrett, for the purchase of 630 S. Broadway Avenue, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Number 094-013-002. B. AUTHORIZE the Redevelopment Director to execute said Purchase and Sale Agreement on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency. C. APPROVE payment of $390,000 for said property rights and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller to issue a check in said amount payable to Financial Title Insurance Company, 1676 North California Blvd. Suite P117, Walnut Creek, CA 94596, Escrow No. 43143206-510-HM to be forwarded to the Real Property Division for delivery. D. Direct the Real Property Division to have the above referenced Grant Deed delivered to the Title Company for recording in the Office of the County Recorder. FISCAL IMPACT: This activity is funded by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (100%). No General Fund money was used on this project. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes:Corrected to read 620 South Broadway and North American Titla Company VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925-335-7230 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: Redevelopment, Assessor, Carmen Pina-Sandoval-Real Property, Maureen Toms-Redevelopment C.102 To: From:David Twa, Redevelopment Agency Executive Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Orbisonia Heights (Berrett) Property Acquisition, Bay Point BACKGROUND: This project is to redevelop approximately 7.6 acres of the Orbisonia Heights subdivision with residential mixed-use, transit-oriented development as described and planned for in the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station Specific Plan approved by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. In order to meet the purpose of this portion of the Specific Plan acquisition of the existing residential properties southeast of the State Highway 4/Bailey Road Interchange must occur. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Agency will not be able to assemble this property with the current properties already acquired within the Specific Plan in the unincorporated community of Bay Point in Contra Costa County. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): A. APPROVE Purchase and Sale Agreement and ACCEPT the Grant Deed from The Esther Stoneking Living Trust Dated 12-18-89, Mary J. Dziedzic, Trustee, for the purchase of 605 and 611 Bailey Road, Bay Point identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers 094-013-010 and 094-013-011. B. AUTHORIZE the Redevelopment Director to execute said Purchase and Sale Agreement on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency. C. APPROVE payment of $500,000 for said property rights and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller to issue a check in said amount payable to North American Title Company, 645 San Ramon Valley Blvd., Danville, CA, 94526, Escrow No. 54705-828033-08 to be forwarded to the Real Property Division for delivery. D. Direct the Real Property Division to have the above referenced Grant Deed delivered to the Title Company for recording in the Office of the County Recorder. FISCAL IMPACT: This activity is funded by the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency (100%). No General Funds are being used for this project. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/24/2009 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925-335-7230 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 24, 2009 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: Maureen Toms, Redevelopment Agency, Olivia Reynolds, Public Works-Real Property, Cheryl Sousa, Public Works - Real Property, County Administrator's Office, County Assessor's Office C.103 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, Redevelopment Agency Executive Director Date:February 24, 2009 Contra Costa County Subject:Orbisonia Heights Property (Stoneking-Dzeidzic) Acquisition, Bay Point Area BACKGROUND: This project is to redevelop approximately 7.6 acres of the Orbisonia Heights subdivision with residential mixed-use, transit-oriented development as described and planned for in the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station Specific Plan approved by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. In order to meet the purpose of this portion of the Specific Plan acquisition of the existing residential properties southeast of the State Highway 4/Bailey Road Interchange must occur. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Agency will not be able to assemble this property with the current properties already acquired within the Specific Plan in the unincorporated community of Bay Point in Contra Costa County. ATTACHMENTS Purchase and Sale Agreement