Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03012011 - C.76RECOMMENDATION(S): REFER SB 662 (DeSaulnier): Integrated Health and Human Services Program to the Legislation Committee for consideration, as recommended by the County Administrator. FISCAL IMPACT: Unknown. The Placer County model of integrating child welfare, mental health, probation, and education case management "has resulted in significant efficiencies and improved outcomes reducing the recurrence of abuse and neglect." BACKGROUND: From time to time, Senator DeSaulnier has discussed with Supervisor Gioia the development of an integrated health and human services program for Contra Costa County. On February 18, 2011, Senator DeSaulnier introduced a bill, SB 662, to implement such a program, modelled after a bill that was developed last year for Placer County, AB 2039 (Logue). (AB 2039 was crafted to make permanent a pilot program for Placer County. It was vetoed by the Governor, who stated in his veto message, "I do not believe it is appropriate to permanently extend this program without some ability to periodically evaluate APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 03/01/2011 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lara DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: March 1, 2011 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C.76 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:March 1, 2011 Contra Costa County Subject:SB 662 (DeSaulier): Integrated Health and Human Services Program its usefulness and effectiveness.") Existing law authorizes Humboldt County, Mendocino County, Alameda County, and any additional county or counties, as determined by the Secretary of California Health and Human Services, to implement, prior to January 1, 2009, a similar pilot program as Placer County, with requirements for evaluation but with no sunset date. AB 2039 would have made permanent Placer County's authority for operating its pilot program to integrate the funding and delivery of services and benefits for the county health and human services system. The author of the bill stated that in 1996, a pilot program in Placer County was authorized (SB 1846 (Leslie), Chapter 899, Statutes of 1996) to address the uncoordinated, separately funded, and narrowly-targeted categorical programs of the child welfare, probation, and mental health systems, which did not address the broader needs of children and families. According to the author, the statute allowed Placer County to create a county child and family services fund that implemented the California Blue Ribbon Commission's goal of building an integrated service model for children in multiple service sectors, and also provided the mechanism to request waivers of regulations and policies to support these integration efforts. The author noted that Placer County has utilized the statutory authority to do the following: BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Implement a single, integrated service-planning approach which utilizes child welfare, mental health, probation and others to have one universal case with a team approach, rather than one case and one plan in each system. Authorize the county office of education to operate a school program in the county's emergency shelter to facilitate a team-based approach to child welfare and education. Develop and implement a strengths-based outcome tool based on the family's assessment of its strengths, rather than on the historically determined "sickness" of the child or parent. Consolidate claiming for multiple public health programs into one universal approach. The author noted that many families that enter the foster care system have multiple issues that affect the environment for the child, including risk of abuse and neglect, mental health and substance abuse issues, probation, courts, etc. The author believed the pilot program had achieved excellent outcomes, including improved service delivery to children and families, reduced demand for services, and a seamless integrated program model, in addition to other efficiencies. According to committee analyses of the first extension of the pilot in 2001, the evaluation of the pilot, funded by Placer County and completed in July 2000 by the Public Health Institute, focused primarily on the effectiveness of the pilot program implementation process and the adjustments necessary to produce desired outcomes in the future. The evaluation also included recommendations intended to be useful to the state and other counties in the process of developing similar integrated and coordinated health and human service delivery systems. The evaluation included several suggestions for future program operation, none of which were included in the legislation to extend the sunset. Examples included the creation of clear communication linkages with the state, increased funding for the development of consolidated information systems, the creation of a common set of accountability measures to assist with evaluation efforts, and state-supported training and technical assistance for county administrators and staff. According to Placer County Board of Supervisors, the sponsor of the measure, the County has successfully implemented a family-centered and needs-based model of services to children and families, including blending the child welfare, mental health, probation, and education services into a single team approach. The County states the Placer model of integrating child welfare, mental health, probation, and education case management has resulted in significant efficiencies and improved outcomes reducing the recurrence of abuse and neglect. Placer County notes that, since 2005, the integrated approach has resulted in a 20 percent reduction in the number of children needing to enter foster care and contributed to more than 100 children finding stable, loving homes with adoptive parents. The County also notes that it has implemented consolidated claiming of 14 public health programs into one claim, reducing administrative complexity and prioritizing service delivery to residents. The California State Association of Counties wrote that the bill would allow Placer County's nationally-recognized and proven approach to health and human services claiming and service delivery to operate indefinitely, which would save both the state and county money, and also ensure the health and welfare of the county's most vulnerable residents. The California Medical Association (CMA) wrote that the bill would assist Placer Nevada County Medical Society members to effectively utilize state and federal funding streams for an array of services that benefit Placer and Nevada county residents. Related/prior legislation AB 1859 (Leslie), Chapter 268, Statutes of 2006, extended Placer County's pilot program five years to July 1, 2011. AB 392 (Chan) of 2005 permits any county, with the assistance and participation of the appropriate state departments, to implement a program for the funding and delivery of services and benefits through an integrated and comprehensive county health and human services system, as specified. Provisions were amended out of the bill. AB 308 (Leslie), Chapter 17, Statutes of 2001, extended Placer County's pilot program five years to July 1, 2006. AB 1259 (Strom-Martin), Chapter 705, Statutes of 1999, gave specific authority to Alameda, Humboldt, and Mendocino Counties, to operate an integration pilot similar to Placer County's. AB 866 (Thomson), Chapter 265, Statutes of 1997, gave specific authority to Solano County to operate an integration pilot similar to Placer County's. SB 1846 (Leslie), Chapter 899, Statutes of 1996, authorized Placer County's pilot program to integrate the funding and delivery of services and benefits for the county health and human services system. POSITIONS Support: Placer County Board of Supervisors (sponsor) California Medical Association California State Association of Counties Child Abuse Prevention Center County Health Executives Association of California County Welfare Directors Association of California Regional Council of Rural Counties Oppose: None received CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this bill is not referred to a committee of the Board of Supervisors, there will be opportunity for committee members to analyze and consider the bill prior to action by the full Board. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS SB 662 (DeSaulnier)