Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06232020 -CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES GOVERNED BY THE BOARD BOARD CHAMBERS ROOM 107, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 651 PINE STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-1229 JOHN GIOIA, CHAIR, 1ST DISTRICT CANDACE ANDERSEN, VICE CHAIR, 2ND DISTRICT DIANE BURGIS, 3RD DISTRICT KAREN MITCHOFF , 4TH DISTRICT FEDERAL D. GLOVER, 5TH DISTRICT DAVID J. TWA, CLERK OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, (925) 335-1900 PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES. A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR. The Board of Supervisors respects your time, and every attempt is made to accurately estimate when an item may be heard by the Board. All times specified for items on the Board of Supervisors agenda are approximate. Items may be heard later than indicated depending on the business of the day. Your patience is appreciated. ANNOTATED AGENDA & MINUTES June 23, 2020            9:00 A.M. Convene and announce adjournment to closed session in Room 101. Closed Session A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code § 54957.6) 1. Agency Negotiators: David Twa and Richard Bolanos. Employee Organizations: Public Employees Union, Local 1; AFSCME Locals 512 and 2700; California Nurses Assn.; SEIU Locals 1021 and 2015; District Attorney Investigators’ Assn.; Deputy Sheriffs Assn.; United Prof. Firefighters I.A.F.F., Local 1230; Physicians’ & Dentists’ Org. of Contra Costa; Western Council of Engineers; United Chief Officers Assn.; Contra Costa County Defenders Assn.; Contra Costa County Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; Prof. & Tech. Engineers IFPTE, Local 21; and Teamsters Local 856. 2. Agency Negotiators: David Twa. Unrepresented Employees: All unrepresented employees. B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1)) Contra Costa County Deputy Sheriffs Association v. Contra Costa County, David O. Livingston, et al., Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. N19-009 1. 9:30 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. Inspirational Thought- "What good is the warmth of summer, without the cold of winter to give it sweetness." ~ John Steinbeck Present: John Gioia, District I Supervisor; Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor; Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor; Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor; Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Staff Present:David Twa, County Administrator CONSIDER CONSENT ITEMS (Items listed as C.1 through C.76 on the following agenda) – Items are subject to removal from Consent Calendar by request of any Supervisor or on request for discussion by a member of the public. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be considered with the Discussion Items.   DISCUSSION ITEMS   D. 1 CONSIDER Consent Items previously removed.    There were no items removed for discussion.   D. 2 PUBLIC COMMENT (2 Minutes/Speaker)    Stephen Steinberg, resident of Walnut Creek, requested the County ban the use of tear gas, evaluate and implement the 8 Can't Wait police reform guidelines (see 8cantwait.org), and conduct an evaluation of law enforcement response to recent protests. Mr. Steinberg is interested in partnering with any Supervisors on bringing a proposal for the evaluation process before the Board; Dinesh, resident of Martinez, spoke on the issue of public trust revolving around last weeks Board action approving the purchase of a security logistics vehicle for search and rescue. He noted that while drones are supposed to be very limited in use, that drones, helicopters and search and rescue vehicles in Ohio were in use to surveil and intimidate protestors . He stated the public does not trust law enforcement to use the tools they are given in they way for which they are intended; Kathy Green, Citizens for Comnunity Empowerment, would like the Board to make community needs, education, health and safety greater prioritization than funding for law enforcement. She said the Sheriff's Department focus is on punishment rather than community aid and does not approve of the recent proposed increase in the Sheriff's budget; Resident of Martinez, said the recommended 2020-2021 budget contains a Sheriff request to add to the detention facility, in order to reduce the population at the Martinez Detention Facility. He requests an explanation of the request for a 14% increase in staffing when jail population is decreasing. He would like the Board to place an item on an upcoming agenda before the budget is adopted in August to discuss questions of operation and expenses; Jackie, resident of Pleasant Hill, would like the County to invest more in our communities versus law enforcement, funding should be directed to services over incarceration; expressed the need to protect the minors in juvenile detention facilities from the pandemics of Covid-19 and racism, and believes it vitally important that the Orin Allen Youth Center remain in operation; Elsie Stevens, would like the county more focused on aid and healing in society, with less emphasis on punishment, persecution and profit. She does not feel the Sheriff should be in charge of rehabilitation and reentry services. She noted that incarcerating heads of households and sending the to other states and countries for letting the student or work visa expires, is jailing someione for a clerical error, and is destroying families. She requests the budget for the Sheriff be decreased. Susanne Thompson, resident of East County, reminded us all of the devastating fires of 2019. She said management and reduction of vegetation is one of the primary ways to reduce the ever growing threat to public safety and the reason behind the fire departments weed abatement programs. She noted that the current county ordinance states no one shall maintain weeds exceeding 18 inches in height. She believes this results in too many properties with overgrown vegetation and would like the ordinance to be amended to be 3 inches in height; Francisco Torres, urges the Board to not increase the Sheriff’s budget and direct those funds to social programs for the betterment of society and feels that law enforcement has become too militarized, and requests the Board members return any campaign funds from the Deputy Sheriffs Association; Jane Croft, resident of Richmond, agrees with previous callers on the reallocation of funds from law enforcement to community social services, removal of police officers from schools, and military equipment from Jaime Cator , resident of Concord, states the Sheriff’s budget should not be increased, is unhappy about the use of tear gas at protests, and is not supportive that some of our law enforcement officers are being trained in a militarized style outside of the United States, and requests funds be allocated to social services; Melvin Willis, Richmond City Council, ACCE, notes that many have come forward with trust issues with the Sheriff’s Department, alleges that a mental health issue was responded to by the Sheriff with the assault of a minor, and requests that at minimum the Board address these problems by considering civilian oversight of law enforcement; Greg Cromenlio, was unhappy about acceptance of military vehicle even if it is cost free and says the Sheriff has refused to comply with SB 1421 by which the court orders the release of information around violence involving officers. He says that the Sheriff is also the coroner and there is no transparency regarding the 14 deaths on Sheriff Livingstons watch; Donald Land, resident of Pittsburg, ACCE, would like to bring to the Board’s attention the opportunity to heal wounds in our society. He notes that people of color have suffered economically and at the hands of law enforcement. He would like to stop funding of the new jail expansion and redirect those funds to opening a hospital, as the one in San Pablo has closed. He hopes the Board can be a force for solutions; Michael Sampson, resident of Walnut Creek, states that the justice system is endemically biased against people of color, and calls for a complete reorganization of law enforcement, to defund the police and direct those funds to social programs such as education that actually serve the citizenry, and reinvest in community; Patricia Aguilarra, Contra Costa Resident, ACCE, is concerned that Supervisors are not listening to the people and requests they cease increased funding for the Sheriffs to reallocate it to social services, and requests that any campaign funds be returned to DSA; Christopher Brown, resident of Martinez, agrees with previous callers in defunding the police, support for the Black Lives Matter movement, and that racism is systemic in our society. He requests the Board move for change; and notes that mental health is a huge part of emergency calls, which should be met with expert assistance, not law enforcement; Karen Perkins, resident of Walnut Creek, member of Racial Justice Coalition, urges the Board to remember that the budget is a moral document and that the citizens are counting on them to bring change by diverting funds from the Sheriff to social services for the community; Natalie McCullough, resident of Contra Costa notes the overwhelming support for reallocation of funds from the Sheriff’s Dept to the community and it is a time when they are following closely the actions of the Board in listening to constituentcy; Cora Mitchell, resident of Concord, says she is agreement with others on not increasing the Sheriff’s budget. She notes the system is reactive, not proactive, and encourages a move toward addressing mental health needs with professionals, not officers. She said we need to prevent crime not react to it afterward; Kelly, resident of Contra Costa, requests the Sheriff’s budget not be increased, but direct funds to assisting the citizens, questions why the Animal Services Department is refusing to accept stray animals, and urges the Board to listen to science in regard to the coronavirus pandemic measures; Anonymous, feels that citizens are being reactionary in calling for defunding of the police that provide protection for society; Denise Pursche, says that the constitution is the will of the people, claims that shelter in place and masking orders are not constitutional and are an order not a law, does not support cutting the law enforcement budget; Unidentified, does not believe that the police are the correct response to a matter involving the mentally ill and urges the Board to consider funding other programs than the Sheriff to meet those needs; Yvette Bulitch, does not believe we should reduce funding for the Sheriff and does not support mandated wearing of masks.   D.3 HEARING to consider approving the 2350 Norris Canyon Road Minor Subdivision Project, a two-lot minor subdivision in the San Ramon area, including rezoning a 30.96-acre portion of the subject property to an exclusive agricultural district (A-20), and adopting a mitigated negative declaration, as recommended by the County Planning Commission. (Daniel Barrios, Conservation and Development Department)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.4 HEARING to consider adoption of Resolution No. 2020/166 approving the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Stormwater Utility Assessments for areas 1-18 for Fiscal Year 2020–2021, as recommended by the Chief Engineer, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Countywide. (100% Stormwater Utility Area Assessments) (Michelle Cordis, Public Works Department)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.5 PRESENTATION by the County Clerk-Recorder regarding preparations for the November 3, 2020 Presidential Election. (Debi Cooper, Clerk-Recorder)       Speakers: Marianna Moore; Dinesh; Lisa Dusbro, Denise Pursche; Alex Zobel, Renee Zeimer; Cora Mitchell.   D.6 CONSIDER adopting Resolution No. 2020/139 to approve the Memorandum of Understanding between the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority and SEIU Local 2015, as recommended by the County Administrator. (David Twa, County Administrator)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.7 PRESENTATION by the Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition and other partners on equity issues related to COVID-19. (Dan Geiger, Coordinator Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition; Vic Baker, Board President, East Bay Leadership Council; Sarah Treuhaft, Managing Director, PolicyLink; and Cheryl Sudduth, Racial Justice Coalition)       Speakers: Melvin Willis, ACCE; Lyn ,; Doug Leach, Multi-Faith Action Coalition; Debbie Toth, Choice in Aging;     D.8 CONSIDER update on COVID 19; and PROVIDE direction to staff. Health Department - Anna Roth, Director and Dr. Farnitano, Health Officer1. Update on Labor and Budget Issues - David Twa, County Administrator2.       Dr. Anna Roth, Health Services Director, reports that cases are continuing to rise in California and nation wide. California is now at 178,000 cases, with 5,500 fatalities. San Joaquin, Solano and Contra Costa counties are seeing an increase in hospitalizations. Contra Costa has 2454 cases, 62 deaths, 35 people are hospitalized, 4 not from Contra Costa, with 7 of our residents in another county's hospital. Over the last week there have been 343 new cases, clearing indicating wide community spread. Our 7 day percent positive is remaining around 3 percent. Closely monitoring the 6 key indicators set by the Bay Area Health Officers to guide reopening measures. There is a slow rise in all indicators. Graphs and statistics are available on the dashboard at cchealth.org. Observing basic protective measures is vital to a reopening. Wash your hands, social distance, wear a mask and stay home if you are sick. Health Services very much wants everyone to get tested. Especially any who work or live with the vulnerable populations. She urges employers to review their sick leave policies to enable those who are ill to stay home. There are two epicenters: assisted living facilities and congregate living facilities. The County has tested over 62,000 people, 183 tests per 100,000 people. We are almost to the goal of 200 tests per 100,000 people. Last week a testing site was opened in the Monument Corridor in Concord, and next week another site will open in Richmond. County testing sites are using the less invasive, more comfortable self-swab test. The county is working with all area providers to ramp up there testing. There is no waiting! Please call 1-844-421-0804 to schedule a test today. The hiring process is complete and Health Services is on-boarding 60 new staff members for contact tracing, to add to the 86 already in place. Ten more will be added each week. Dr. Sara Levin, Internal Medicine, Deputy Health Officer, informed the Board that it was recognized early in the pandemic that a coordinated response was necessary to control the spread of the virus in congregate care facilities, particularly in the highest risk population, the elderly. The public-private partnership has performed well. The county performed site visits with all senior care facilities with more than 8 or more beds. The priority has been in facilities for long term care for the elderly. Health Services is not a regulatory body for these facilities. They reached out to each site to help with training and ppe supplies for infection control and prevention. The April 13th health order required that visitation be limited, all staff and visitors be masked, and a log kept of all persons on site for residential care facilities. The May 29th Health order mandated that all long-term care facility personnel and residents be tested. 99 percent of deaths were among people over 50 years of age: 66 % of deaths were over 80; 15% were between 70 -80; 18% were 50-70 and 1% were under 50. Two-thirds were residents of senior care facilities. Patients are being transferred to hospital when appropriate. The reopening timeline is subject to adjustment according to indicators, in particular hospitalization numbers and capacity of hospitals. The health officers are reconciling the state and local guidelines, with some adjustments On July 1st we intend to open hotels for tourism and individual travel; indoor museums, limited indoor entertainment such as arcades, billiards, bowling alleys, gyms and fitness centers and personal training; bars, with or without food; and personal services that don’t involve the face (massage, tattoos, body waxing, nail salons); and indoor dining On July 15th we intend to open Personal service that do involve the face; movie theaters, and card rooms The Contra Costa Education Department worked with the health department, they have posted to their website a reopening guideline. Reopening plans are subject to change if the indicators of the Bay Area Health Officers reflect it is not yet time because spread and hospitalizations have increased. To keep up to date on information, please visit the dashboard at cchealth.org   D. 9 CONSIDER reports of Board members.    Supervisor Burgis updated us on the 2020 Census standings. Contra Costa is in second place behind Santa Clara at a 70.9 response rate. She encourages us all to keep reaching out through social media.   Closed Session    There were no reports from Closed Session.   ADJOURN in memory of ADJOURN in memory of Bob Cameron Bethel Island resident   CONSENT ITEMS   Road and Transportation   C. 1 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a joint exercise powers agreement between Contra Costa County and the City of Dublin for the design and construction of the Camino Tassajara/Tassajara Road Realignment Project, San Ramon area. (100% Local, Regional, and Sub-Regional Funds)       Written correspondence in opposition was received from Richard Fischer, a co-founder of the Tassajara Valley Preservation Association (attached).    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Engineering Services   C. 2 ADOPT Resolution No. 2020/159 approving the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for minor subdivision MS18-00007, for a project being developed by The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 3 ADOPT Resolution No. 2020/160 approving the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS18-00007, for a project being developed by The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 4 ADOPT Resolution No. 2020/164 ratifying the prior decision of the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of eastbound lanes of Wayne Drive, between Buskirk Avenue and Oak Road, on June 20, 2020 from 6:00 AM through 1:00 PM, for the purpose of hoisting chillers to a rooftop, Walnut Creek area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Special Districts & County Airports   C. 5 ADOPT Resolution No. 2020/167 approving and authorizing the Chief Engineer, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, or designee, to impose the annual Drainage Area Benefit Assessments for Fiscal Year 2020/21 for Drainage Areas 67a, 75a, 76a, 520, 910, 1010, and 1010a, Walnut Creek, San Ramon, Alamo, Oakley, and Danville areas. (100% Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 6 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation    C. 6 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, or designee, to execute a grant agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, including County indemnity, in an amount not to exceed $950,000 to provide partial implementation funding for the Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project, for the period July 1, 2020, or upon Grantor approval, to December 31, 2022, Martinez area. (6% California Department of Fish and Wildlife Greenhouse Gas Grant Funds, 7% Flood Control District Zone 3B Funds, and 87% other local, state and federal grant funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 7 As the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or designee, to execute a maintenance agreement with the Town of Danville, to accept maintenance responsibilities for a portion of the West Branch of West Alamo Creek, Drainage Area 1010, and accept an easement from the Town and take related actions under the California Environmental Quality Act, Danville area. (100% Drainage Area 1010 Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Claims, Collections & Litigation   C. 8 DENY claims filed by Lida Behnam, et al., Katia Nicole Berberi, Matthew Berberi, Francisco Galvez, GEICO a subrogee of Yolanda Sims, USW Local 5, Michelle Wong, and James L. Young.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Statutory Actions   C. 9 ACCEPT Board members meeting reports for May 2020.      AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Honors & Proclamations   C. 10 ADOPT Resolution No. 2020/165 declaring June 2020, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Questioning (LGBTQ) Pride Month in Contra Costa County, as recommended by Supervisors Mitchoff and Gioia.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appointments & Resignations   C. 11 APPOINT Duane Burlison, to the Appointee 4 seat on the Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District Fire Advisory Commission for the remainder of the four-year term ending December 31, 2021, as recommended by Supervisor Glover.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 12 DECLARE a vacancy on the IHSS Public Authority Advisory Committee for a consumer seat due to ongoing absenteeism.         AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 13 APPOINT Nancy Leasure to At Large #8 seat with a term expiring September 30, 2020 on the Advisory Council on Aging.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 14 REAPPOINT Michael McGill and Carol Asch to the Workforce Development Board for terms beginning July 1, 2020 and expiring June 30, 2024; AND APPOINT Yolanda Vega and Kwame Reed to the Workforce Development Board for terms beginning July 1, 2020 and expiring June 30, 2024.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 15 REAPPOINT Richard Johnson and Stacey Marshall to the Workforce Development Board for terms beginning July 1, 2020 and expiring June 30, 2024.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 16 APPROVE the appointment of Evelyn Howard to Seat #5 of the Alcohol & Other Drugs Advisory Board for a term expiring June 30, 2020 and appoint for an additional term that expires on June 30, 2023.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appropriation Adjustments   C. 17 Workforce Development Board (0583): APPROVE Appropriation and Revenue Adjustment No. 005079 authorizing new Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, Underserved COVID-19 Impacted Individuals Grant revenue in the amount of $25,000 and expenditure adjustments for Service Connected Aid and Contracts, in the Employment and Human Services Department. (100% Federal)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 18 Acting as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, APPROVE Appropriation and Revenue Adjustment No.005078 and AUTHORIZE an increase in available fund balance in the amount of $750,000 from Drainage Area 55 Fund 257900 and appropriating it to DA 55 Rights of Way & Easements account, as recommended by the Chief Engineer, Antioch area. (100% Drainage Area 55 Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Intergovernmental Relations   C. 19 ADOPT a position of "Support" on AB 2959 (Calderon): Solid Waste: Byproducts from Processing Food, a bill that reauthorizes local government entities to exercise authority with regard to the hauling of byproducts from the processing of food or beverages if those byproducts originate from a supermarket, grocer, restaurant, or other retail food establishment.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Personnel Actions Personnel Actions   C. 20 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25614 to establish the classifications of Chief of Administrative Services-Project (unrepresented) and Volunteer Program Coordinator-Project (represented) and add position of each classification; add one Health Services Planner/Evaluator Level A-Project (represented); one Departmental Personnel Officer-Exempt (unrepresented); one Assistant Director of Health Services-Exempt (unrepresented) positions in the Health Services Department as part of the countywide response to the COVID-19 pandemic. (Up to 100% Federal)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 21 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25613 to add two Assistant Public Defender-Exempt (unrepresented) position and appoint two employees to the positions, and delete two Deputy Public Defender IV position in the Public Defenders Office with an effective date of July 1, 2020. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 22 RATIFY County Administrator's direction to the Human Resources Department to temporarily expand the Tactical Employment Team Program to include support of individuals released due to budget reductions during their probationary period, as recommended by the County Administrator.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Grants & Contracts   APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreements between the County and the following agencies for receipt of fund and/or services:   C. 23 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept one-time supplemental CARES funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families in an amount not to exceed $1,690,825 for supplemental program services related to the coronavirus during the term January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. (100% Federal)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 24 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to apply for and accept Program Improvement funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Head Start, in an amount not to exceed $995,000 for renovation and construction at a central kitchen facility for the Head Start program at 303 41 Street in Richmond, for the period January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. (80% Federal, 20% County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 25 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a novation contract with the City of San Pablo to provide congregate meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021, including a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2021. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 26 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment    C. 26 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, to extend the termination date from June 30, 2020 to December 31, 2020 with no change to the payment limit to the County of $30,000 to support the East County Moves Program, which increases healthy foods and physical activity in the Pittsburg and Bay Point communities. ($9,193 County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 27 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Education to pay the County an amount not to exceed $27,500 to fund pre-kindergarten and family literacy program support services for the term July 2, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 28 ADOPT Resolution No. 2020/169 to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract to accept funding in an amount not to exceed $5,177,289 from the California Department of Aging for Older Americans Act Title III and Title VII services for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (77% Federal, 20% State, 3% County Match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 29 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Education to pay County an amount not to exceed $3,665,811 for alternative payment childcare programs, for the term July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (58% Federal, 42% State, No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 30 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Education to pay County an amount not to exceed $6,098,858 to provide CalWORKS Stage 2 childcare and development programs for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (83% State, 17% Federal, No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 31 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Education for County to receive an amount not to exceed $11,118,905 to provide State Preschool services, for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (100% State, No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 32 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept a grant award from the State of California Health and Human Services Agency, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $1,700,000 to provide emergency housing through Project Roomkey, an initiative to secure housing for homeless individuals and to prevent the spread of COVID-19 for the period March 18, 2020 through June 30, 2020. (No County match required)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 33 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a    C. 33 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Education, to pay County an amount not to exceed $3,855,946 for general childcare and development program services for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (35% Federal, 65% State, No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 34 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the City of San Ramon, to pay County an amount not to exceed $25,000 to provide home-delivered and congregate meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (No County Match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 35 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the Town of Danville, to provide congregate meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 36 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the City of El Cerrito, to provide congregate meal services for the County’s Senior Nutrition Program for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 37 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the District Attorney, or designee, to submit an application and execute a grant award agreement, and any extensions or amendments thereof pursuant to State guidelines, with the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services, Victim Services & Public Safety Branch, for funding of the Victim/Witness Assistance Program in the amount of $1,439,926 for the period October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 38 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to accept funding in an amount not to exceed $5,000 from California Health Care Advocates to provide volunteer liaison support for the Senior Medicare Patrol-Medicare Fraud program for the period June 1, 2020 through May 31, 2021. (100% Federal, No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreement between the County and the following parties as noted for the purchase of equipment and/or services:   C. 39 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Orantes, LLC dba Tiny Toes Preschool and Childcare Center, to increase the payment limit by $123,231 to a new payment limit of $220,343, effective October 1, 2019, and to add 14 State General Childcare and Development and 8 Head Start Childcare Partnership slots, for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (54% Federal, 46% State, No County Match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 40 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute a contract, including indemnification language changes, with Industrial Employers and Distributor's Association in an amount not to exceed $720,000 to provided labor negotiations and support services for the period of July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2023. (100% General Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 41 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings in an amount not to exceed $9,450 to provide genetic parentage testing services for clients of the Children and Family Services Bureau for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (30% County, 70% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 42 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with San Ramon Valley Unified School District to increase the payment limit by $7,690 to a new payment limit of $245,377, to increase the daily reimbursement rate for State preschool childcare services, with no change to term July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 43 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Ombudsman Services of Contra Costa, Inc., effective February 2, 2020, to increase the payment limit by $10,730 to a new payment limit of $502,187 to improve the delivery of long-term care ombudsman services with no change to the term ending June 30, 2020. (20% Federal, 80% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 44 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Richmond Elementary School, Inc. to increase the payment limit by $8,544 to a new payment limit of $272,640, to increase the daily reimbursement rate for State preschool services, with no change to term July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 45 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Aunt Bertha, a Public Benefit Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $100,000 to provide hosted software subscription services to a patient resource database for the period April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. (100% Whole Person Care funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 46 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with FCS International, Inc. (dba FirstCarbon Solutions/Michael Brandman Associates), to increase the payment limit by $16,700 to a new payment limit of $370,686, with no change to the original term of October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2020, to complete the environmental study of the proposed 284-unit Del Hombre apartment complex in the Walnut Creek area. (100% Applicant Fees)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 47 Acting as the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, APPROVE and    C. 47 Acting as the governing board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Fire Chief, or designee, to execute (1) a purchase contract with Halcore Group, Inc. (DBA American Emergency Vehicles) for 20 ambulance vehicles in an amount not to exceed $3,200,000, (2) a sixth lease schedule to the Master Lease Agreement with PNC Equipment Finance, LLC in an amount not to exceed $3,200,000 with annual payments not to exceed $630,000 for a term from June 23, 2020 to June 23, 2025, and (3) an escrow agreement among PNC Equipment Finance, LLC, the Fire District, and U.S. Bank National Association, for the lease-purchase of the ambulance vehicles. (100% CCCFPD Ambulance Transport Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 48 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Clerk-Recorder, or designee, to execute a contract with the City of El Cerrito to permit the County to provide documentary transfer tax collection services for the City, for the period July 1, 2020 until terminated. (100% City reimbursement)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 49 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 to provide temporary nurse staffing services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2021. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 50 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with SHC Services, Inc. (dba Supplemental Health Care), in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 to provide temporary medical staffing services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers and County Detention Facilities for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 51 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Mariposa McCall, M.D., to extend the termination date from June 30, 2020 to September 30, 2020, with no change in the payment limit of $338,912, for additional outpatient psychiatric care services to adults in Central County. (100% Mental Health Realignment)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 52 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Initha R. Elangovan, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $420,000 to provide pulmonology services to Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Center patients for the period September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2021. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 53 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with St. Helena Hospital (dba Adventist Health Vallejo), in an amount not to exceed $75,000 to provide inpatient psychiatric hospital services for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (100% Mental Health Realignment)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 54 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to    C. 54 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with We Care Services for Children, to increase the payment limit by $7,690 to a new payment limit of $245,377 for State Preschool services with no change to the term July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% State, No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 55 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority, a public agency, for County to pay an amount not to exceed $2,471,294, to provide in-home care-giving services to IHSS recipients, for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (19%. County, 29% State, 52% Federal)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 56 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Child Abuse Prevention Council, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,358,693 to provide child abuse prevention services for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (70% State, 30% County)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 57 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Elior, Inc. (dba Bateman Community Living), effective May 1, 2020, to increase the payment limit by $525,000 to a new payment limit of $3,696,323 to provide additional meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program with no change in the term of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, and to increase the three month automatic extension payment limit by $131,250 to a new payment limit of $924,081. (100% Title III C-1; Title III C-2 of the Federal Older Americans Act of 1965)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 58 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Cross Country Staffing, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $2,700,000 to provide temporary medical staffing services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 59 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Per Diem Staffing Systems, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $800,000 to provide temporary respiratory therapists, nursing services and other medical services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 60 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with All Health Services, Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000 to provide temporary medical staffing services at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Health Centers, and Detention Facilities for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 61 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a    C. 61 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Chabot-Las Positas Community College District, in an amount not to exceed $450,000 for the District to deliver education and training services to foster care providers, community partners, and Children and Family Services staff for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 62 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with SHC Services, Inc. (dba Supplemental Health Care), in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 to provide temporary medical staffing services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Detention Facility for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 63 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Bay Area Community Resources, to extend the termination date from June 30, 2020 to September 30, 2020, with no change in the payment limit of $310,707, for additional consultation and technical assistance to reduce and prevent the use of tobacco products among populations with high rates of smoking. (100% California Department of Public Health Grant)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 64 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Monument Impact, to extend the termination date from June 30, 2020 to September 30, 2020, with no change in the payment limit of $247,575, for additional consultation, training, education and evaluation of programs and policies to limit the sale of flavored tobacco near schools. (100% California Department of Public Health Grant)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 65 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Groupware Technology, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,999,950 for the purchase of VMWare software licenses and support for the period June 30, 2020 through July 1, 2025. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Other Actions   C. 66 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Mt. Diablo Unified School District, to collaborate with County for youth enrolled in the Mt. Diablo Youth Employment Services and Career Pathways Program to be placed in internships through-out the Health Services Department for the period June 1, 2020 through May 31, 2022.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 67 ACCEPT a preliminary needs assessment report on Psychiatric Emergency Services as recommended by Contra Costa County Grand Jury Report #1909 and APPROVE a status update be completed in 120 days. (No Fiscal Impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 68 APPROVE the 2020/2021 North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan, as    C. 68 APPROVE the 2020/2021 North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan, as recommended by the North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee. (100% North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 69 ADOPT Contra Costa County Transportation Analysis Guidelines, consistent with the requirements of SB-743, as recommended by the Conservation and Development Director. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 70 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, or designee, to pay an amount not to exceed $10,460 to Staff Care, Inc., for providing additional temporary locum tenens physician services during the period May 1, 2019 through May 31, 2019. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 71 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Librarian, or designee, to relocate surplus furniture and shelving from the Pleasant Hill Library to the Contra Costa County Historical Society, the Friends of the Pleasant Hill Library, the City of Pleasant Hill, and the Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder's Office.(No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 72 ACKNOWLEDGE receipt of Civil Grand Jury Report No. 2004, entitled "Police Department Staffing" and the subsequent responses from the Sheriff-Coroner, APPROVE the response from the Board of Supervisors, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to forward the response to the Superior Court following Board action, as recommended by the County Administrator. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 73 RECEIVE Civil Grand Jury Report No. 2005, entitled "Public Safety Power Shutoff", and REFER to the County Administrator and Sheriff-Coroner for response. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 74 RECEIVE Civil Grand Jury Report No. 2006, entitled "Juveniles in Detention", and REFER to the County Administrator and the Chief Probation Officer for response. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 75 ACCEPT the Public Safety Realignment FY 2018-19 AB 109 Annual Report, prepared by the Office of Reentry and Justice and recommended by the Community Corrections Partnership.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 76 CONTINUE the emergency action originally taken by the Board of Supervisors on November 16, 1999, and most recently approved by the Board on December 18, 2018, regarding the issue of homelessness in Contra Costa County, as recommended by the Health Services Director. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover   GENERAL INFORMATION The Board meets in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402, including as the Housing Authority and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. Persons who wish to address the Board should complete the form provided for that purpose and furnish a copy of any written statement to the Clerk. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the Clerk of the Board to a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors less than 72 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 651 Pine Street, First Floor, Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553, during normal business hours. All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Board to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Board or a member of the public prior to the time the Board votes on the motion to adopt. Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Chair calls for comments from those persons who are in support thereof or in opposition thereto. After persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and the matter is subject to discussion and action by the Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the Board of Supervisors can be submitted to the office of the Clerk of the Board via mail: Board of Supervisors, 651 Pine Street Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553; by fax: 925-335-1913. The County will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Board meetings who contact the Clerk of the Board at least 24 hours before the meeting, at (925) 335-1900; TDD (925) 335-1915. An assistive listening device is available from the Clerk, Room 106. Copies of recordings of all or portions of a Board meeting may be purchased from the Clerk of the Board. Please telephone the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 335-1900, to make the necessary arrangements. Forms are available to anyone desiring to submit an inspirational thought nomination for inclusion on the Board Agenda. Forms may be obtained at the Office of the County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California. Applications for personal subscriptions to the weekly Board Agenda may be obtained by calling the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 335-1900. The weekly agenda may also be viewed on the County’s Internet Web Page: www.co.contra-costa.ca.us STANDING COMMITTEES The Airport Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets quarterly on the second Wednesday of the month at 11:00 a.m. at the Director of Airports Office, 550 Sally Ride Drive, Concord. The Family and Human Services Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Candace Andersen) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Finance Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets on the first Monday of every other month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Public Protection Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Federal D. Glover) meets on the first Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Sustainability Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets on the fourth Monday of every other month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the second Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. Airports Committee August 12, 2020 11:00 a.m.See above Family & Human Services Committee July 27, 2020 9:00 a.m.See above Finance Committee July 6, 2020 Canceled August 3, 2020 Canceled September 7, 2020 9:00 a.m.See above Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee September 14, 2020 10:30 a.m.See above Internal Operations Committee July 13, 2020 10:30 a.m.See above Legislation Committee July 13, 2020 1:00 p.m.See above Public Protection Committee July 27, 2020 10:30 a.m.See above Sustainability Committee July 27, 2020 1:00 p.m.See above Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee July 13, 2020 9:00 a.m.See above PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR AGENDA DEADLINE: Thursday, 12 noon, 12 days before the Tuesday Board meetings. Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its Board of Supervisors meetings and written materials. Following is a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral presentations and written materials associated with Board meetings: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees AICP American Institute of Certified Planners AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BayRICS Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications System BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BGO Better Government Ordinance BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCCPFD (ConFire) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CCRMC Contra Costa Regional Medical Center CCWD Contra Costa Water District CDBG Community Development Block Grant CFDA Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CIO Chief Information Officer COLA Cost of living adjustment ConFire (CCCFPD) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CPA Certified Public Accountant CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission dba doing business as DSRIP Delivery System Reform Incentive Program EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District ECCFPD East Contra Costa Fire Protection District EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee EMS Emergency Medical Services EPSDT Early State Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Mental Health) et al. et alii (and others) FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency F&HS Family and Human Services Committee First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10) FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development HHS (State Dept of ) Health and Human Services HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome HOV High Occupancy Vehicle HR Human Resources HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development IHSS In-Home Supportive Services Inc. Incorporated IOC Internal Operations Committee ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LLC Limited Liability Company LLP Limited Liability Partnership Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1 LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse MAC Municipal Advisory Council MBE Minority Business Enterprise M.D. Medical Doctor M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist MIS Management Information System MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties NEPA National Environmental Policy Act OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology O.D. Doctor of Optometry OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PARS Public Agencies Retirement Services PEPRA Public Employees Pension Reform Act Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology RDA Redevelopment Agency RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposal RFQ Request For Qualifications RN Registered Nurse SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SEIU Service Employees International Union SUASI Super Urban Area Security Initiative SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TRE or TTE Trustee TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee UASI Urban Area Security Initiative VA Department of Veterans Affairs vs. versus (against) WAN Wide Area Network WBE Women Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. OPEN the public hearing on the 2350 Norris Canyon Road Minor Subdivision Project, RECEIVE testimony, and CLOSE the public hearing. 2. FIND that the mitigated negative declaration prepared for the 2350 Norris Canyon Road Minor Subdivision Project adequately analyzes the Project's environmental impacts, that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment, and that the mitigated negative declaration reflects the County's independent judgment and analysis. 3. ADOPT the mitigated negative declaration for the Project. 4. ADOPT the mitigation monitoring program for the Project. 5. DIRECT the Department of Conservation and Development to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. 6. SPECIFY that the Department of Conservation and Development, located at 30 Muir Road, Martinez, California, is the custodian of the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Barrios, (925) 674-7788 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D.3 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:2350 Norris Canyon Road Minor Subdivision Project RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) 7. ADOPT Ordinance No. 2020-06, rezoning a 30.96-acre portion of the subject property from Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) to Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20) (County File #RZ19-3249). 8. ACKNOWLEDGE that the Planning Commission approved the vesting tentative map for the Project and the associated variance from the 40-acre minimum lot size requirement of the Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) to allow the remaining 38.38-acre portion of the subject property to remain in that zone (County File #MS18-0008), and no appeal of these approvals were filed. 9. APPROVE the 2350 Norris Canyon Road Minor Subdivision Project. 10. APPROVE the findings in support of the Project. 11. APPROVE the Project conditions of approval. FISCAL IMPACT: The applicant has paid the necessary application deposits and is obligated to pay supplemental fees to cover all additional costs associated with the application process. BACKGROUND: Summary This hearing is to consider the 2350 Norris Canyon Road Minor Subdivision Project, including the rezoning of a 30.96-acre portion of the subject property from the Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) to the Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20). The subject property is 69.34 acres located at 2350 Norris Canyon Road in the San Ramon area. A vesting tentative map to subdivide the subject property into two new parcels, Parcel A (38.38-acres) and Parcel B (30.96-acres), was approved by the Planning Commission on February 12, 2020 (MS18-0008). The new parcels are separated by Norris Canyon Road. The subdivision was approved contingent upon approval of the rezoning of Parcel B to a A-20 zone from its current A-4 zoning. The Exclusive Agricultural (A-20) zone has a minimum lot size of 20 acres. Parcel B cannot be further subdivided without being rezoned to a zoning district with a higher density. General Information General Plan: The subject parcel (Parcel B) has a General Plan designation of Single-Family Residential Low Density (SL). Zoning: The subject parcel (Parcel B) is located within the Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) and will be rezoned to the Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20). Site/Area Description: The subject parcel (Parcel B) is part of an approximately 69.34-acre property located at the northeast corner of Norris Canyon Road and Ashbourne Drive in the unincorporated San Ramon area. A single-family residence is located on Parcel A and Parcel B is vacant. The land to the northeast, west, and south of the subject property are established open space and agricultural lands, and the area adjacent to the southeast of the subject property is the Norris Canyon Estates development. The property and its surrounding area slope moderately with many peaks throughout the rolling hills. Within the local area, Interstate 680 is located approximately 1.8 miles east of the property, the County line with Alameda County is located at the northeast corner of the property, and the City of San Ramon is approximately 0.65 miles northeast. County Planning Commission Hearing The County Planning Commission (CPC) initially heard the project on January 22, 2020. The CPC continued the hearing to allow staff to address the applicant’s concerns regarding condition of approval (COA) #9 which requires the establishment of a 2-acre building envelope on Parcel B prior to recordation of the parcel map. This COA was required as a mitigation measure as descried in the Mitigated Negative Declaration as Aesthetics-1 (AES-1). On January 29, 2020, the applicant submitted a response to the CEQA Mitigation Measures and the conditions of approval, as well as a request to allow an exception to Chapter 96-10 of the County Ordinance related to undergrounding utilities. Public Works staff responded that it had no opposition to the granting of this exception and recommended approval of the exception. After discussing the matter with the applicant, staff provided additional General Plan Policies that supported the proposed COA #9. At the February 12, 2020 CPC hearing, the applicant agreed to the proposed mitigation measures and conditions of approval without modification. The Commission then approved the minor subdivision, with a variance to the minimum lot size for Parcel A and an exception to the undergrounding of utilities requirements of Title 9, and adopted a recommendation that the Board approve the rezoning of Parcel B from A-4 to A-20. Staff Analysis Environmental Review: In accordance with the provisions of CEQA, an Initial Study was prepared for the project. The Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts in the areas of aesthetics, cultural resources, geology & soils, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire, and it proposed mitigation measures to reduce the impacts to a less-than-significant level. The public review comment period for the Initial Study extended from September 26, 2019 until October 28, 2019. Two comments were received within the comment period from Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) and East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), which are summarized below: 1. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD) Comments: In a response received October 15, 2019, CCCSD staff indicated that the project site is within their service area and currently receiving services. Future sanitary service to Parcel B would need to be reviewed by CCCSD staff to ensure development meets all sanitary service development standards. Staff Response: Staff has included an advisory note to work with CCCSD staff for future water service if development is proposed for Parcel B. 2. East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Comments: In a response received October 18, 2019, EBMUD staff indicated that proposed Parcel A is outside of their service area, but Parcel B is within it. Future water service to Parcel B would need to be reviewed by EBMUD staff to ensure development meets all water service development standards. Additional notes on clarifications related to this matter were also included regarding sections of the CEQA Initial Study. Staff Response: Staff has included an advisory note to work with EBMUD staff for future water service if development is proposed for Parcel B. Upon rezoning of Parcel B to the Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20) the parcel would remain consistent with the SL designation. The purpose of the A-20 zoning district is to provide and protect areas for agricultural uses by preventing the establishment of urban and any other incompatible land uses thereon, and the land uses allowed in A-20 are all agricultural in nature. Although no development is proposed at this time, A-20 allows the construction of one single-family residence, an accessory dwelling unit and other accessory structures by right. Conditions have been included to ensure that any future development of Parcel B is done in a manner that would not negatively impact the surrounding area. As the subject property is already surrounded by agricultural and residential properties and there is no development proposed as a part of this project, the proposed subdivision would maintain the established community setting. General Plan Consistency General Plan Consistency: Staff has determined that the rezoning of Parcel B from Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) to the Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20) is consistent with the following General Plan Goals and Policies: 1. Urban Limit Line (ULL): The subject property is located within the Urban Limit Line (ULL) and is consistent with the following policies of the Land Use Element: Policy 3-9: Areas not suitable for urban development because of the lack of availability of public facilities shall remain in their present use until the needed infrastructure is or can be assured of being provided. East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) has indicated that Parcel B may be served by EBMUD water service provided any future proposed development meets their water service development standards. Any future development would be required to be reviewed and approved by CCEHD or EBMUD to ensure existing and/or proposed water facilities meet applicable standards. The project site is served by the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD). Although no development is included, the project would have the potential to enable construct of a residence on Parcel B. Any future development would be required to be reviewed and approved by CCCSD to ensure compliance with their wastewater standards. Policy 3-28: New residential development shall be accommodated only in areas where it will avoid creating severe unmitigated adverse impacts upon the environment and upon the existing community. Policy 3-29: New housing projects shall be located on stable and secure lands or shall be designed to mitigate adverse or potentially adverse conditions. Residential densities of conventional construction shall generally decrease as the natural slope increases. The proposed project would not create unmitigated adverse impacts on the environment or the existing community. Additionally, the mitigation measures included Aesthetics-1, which requires the project sponsor to identify a building envelope on Parcel B, subject to the review and approval of CDD, that shall be limited to two acres in total area and shall be located in such a way as to minimize visual impacts as viewed from Norris Canyon Road. Additionally, Geology-1 through Geology-4 require numerous geologic and soil studies to ensure the safety of any future development prior to obtaining building permits for any structures. These mitigation measures are included in the attached conditions of approval. 2. Rural Residential Development “Ranchette Policy”: As the proposed subdivision is for a property located in the AL designation, the County’s Rural Residential Development policies apply. Parcel A, the portion of the site located in the AL designation, is already developed with a single-family residence and is under a Williamson Act contract, but Parcel B is located in the SL designation. As required by its Williamson Act contract, Parcel A would continue to be utilized for cattle grazing and dry farming, and would thus remain in compliance with the intent and purpose of the AL designation and the Ranchette Policy. Additionally, Parcel A would be 38.38 acres, which exceeds the 5-acre minimum for land designated AL. As Parcel A is already developed with a single-family residence, it has an established water supply from an on-site well and receives sanitary sewer service from Central Contra Costa Sanitary District. 3. Scenic Route: Figure 9-1 (Scenic Ridges & Waterways) of the General Plan Open Space Element identifies the specific resources of Contra Costa County as designated scenic ridges and waterways. The intent of these scenic resource designations is to preserve and protect areas of identified high scenic value, where practical, and in accordance with the Land Use Element. The subject property is located at the corner of Norris Canyon Road and Ashbourne Drive in the unincorporated San Ramon area. This property is located adjacent to the Norris Canyon scenic ridge, as outlined in the Contra Costa County 2005-2020 General Plan. Figure 5-4 designates Norris Canyon Road as a scenic route. As such, this property is located within the vicinity of a designated scenic ridgeway to the south and the scenic route of Norris Canyon Road, as designated in the Contra Costa County 2005-2020 General Plan. The proposed project does not include the construction of any new buildings or structures. However, the newly created potential for future development on proposed Parcel B could detract from scenic qualities of the surrounding area and pose a potentially significant impact if left unmitigated. As such, staff maintains that the applicant should be required to implement mitigation measures Aesthetics-1 and Aesthetics-2 to reduce the potential for negative impacts on a scenic route and scenic ridgeline, and these mitigation measures are included in the attached conditions of approval. The creation of a new lot to be zoned A-20 would allow, by right, the development of a single-family residence, accessory dwelling unit and accessory buildings and structures auxiliary to it. Without this mitigation measure, these allowed structures could potentially be placed anywhere throughout the parcel, which would significantly impact the scenic qualities of the Norris Canyon designated scenic route and scenic ridgeline. The scenic quality behind this designation in the General Plan is derived from the natural resources of the surrounding hills and ridges. Allowing unmitigated development of Parcel B would be an unmitigated significant impact on the environment, and an environmental impact report would be required. Section IV.A.1. of the 2/12/2020 CPC staff report also includes a list of additional supporting General Plan Policies related to this project and scenic resource preservation. Zoning Compliance : The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning of Parcel B from Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) to Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20). The A-20 zoning district requires a minimum lot size of 20 acres, a minimum average width of 250 feet, and a minimum depth of 300 feet. Parcel B meets these requirements, as it is proposed to be 30.96 acres in total area, have an approximately 917-foot average width, and an approximately 1,471-foot depth. Although no development is proposed at this time, upon subdividing and rezoning Parcel B to A-20, only one single-family residence and associated structures allowed by the A-20 zoning district could be developed on the new parcel. The project will also be in compliance with Division 814 - Slope and Hillside Development. Section 814-2.204 states that the Board of Supervisors have found and declared the following: (1) The terrain of certain areas of the County provides a unique and substantial character to the area and forms an integral part of the county's total environment, (2) due to their physical prominence in the county's landscape, development of hillside areas affects the visual and environmental character of the county, and (3) hillside development should preserve the natural terrain, environmental quality and aesthetic character of the county, while providing creative, innovative and safe residential development with a variety of housing types. Additionally, Section 814-2.206(b) states that, “The attractiveness of hillside and ridge line areas and the other objectives specified in this article are important factors of the general welfare of the citizens of the county, and reasonable control of residential slope density and hillside development is in the public interest.” Section 814-2.1006 states the following regarding the ability of the planning agency to impose development limits on building areas: To keep all graded areas and cuts and fills to a minimum, eliminate unsightly grading, preserve and maximize the natural appearance and beauty of the property, and to implement this chapter, the director of planning or the planning agency may impose requirements on the size of the areas to be graded or to be used for building, on the size, height, and angles of cut slopes and fill slopes, and the shape thereof. In appropriate cases, retaining walls may be required. Accordingly, the County can limit the size of building envelopes. AES-1 currently states that the building envelope is limited to two acres in size (87,120 square feet). Consistent with the identified mitigation measures, the conditions of approval would restrict the development of a single-family residence, as well as buildings and normal accessory structures, to a building envelope of 87,120 square feet (two acres). Expanding beyond this envelope would present a significant negative impact to the General Plan’s designated scenic route and ridge line. Conclusion The proposed project, including a vesting tentative map to divide a 69.34-acre parcel into two agricultural parcels and a rezone of the proposed Parcel B from Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) to Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20), is consistent with the Agricultural Lands (AL) and Single-Family Residential Low Density (SL) General Plan Land Use designations and complies with the intent and purpose of the Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) and Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20). Therefore, staff recommends that the County Board of Supervisors approve the proposed Project. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: In the event that the proposed project is not approved, the applicant will not obtain approval of the required Rezoning entitlement needed to allow the proposed two-lot subdivision project in the unincorporated San Ramon area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Findings & COAs for MS18-0008 Ordinance No. 2020-06 Maps Project Plans CEQA Initial Study CEQA Comments CEQA MMP Agency Comments Powerpoint Presentation: Norris Canyon Minor Subdiv Project MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Ordinance 2020-06 FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR R. ROSS AVEDIAN – P/A DESIGN RESOURCES, INC. (APPLICANT) & ROBERT FREITAS (OWNER); COUNTY FILE S #MS18-0008 & RZ19-3249 I. FINDINGS A. Growth Management Findings 1. Traffic: Policy 4 -c of the Growth Management Element of the General Plan requires a traffic impact analysis of any project that is estimated to generate 100 or more additional AM or PM peak-hour trips. The project consisting of a two-lot subdivision has the potential to generate an estimated two AM and two PM peak-hour trips, and therefore, is not required to have a project - specific traffic impact analysis. Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact on traffic in the local area. 2. Water: The project site is not served by a water service provider. As no development is currently proposed, it is not anticipated that new water facilities will be required to accommodate the project, as there would be no increased requirements for water service. East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) has indicated that Parcel B may be served by EBMUD water service. Any future development would be required to be reviewed and approved by CCEHD or EBMUD to ensure existing and/or proposed water facilities meet applicable standards. 3. Sanitary Sewer: The project site is served by the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD). Although no development is included, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. Any future development would be required to be reviewed and approved by CCCSD to ensure compliance with their wastewater standards. By meeting the development standards of CCCSD, the proposed project is expected to be accommodated by CCCSD facilities without expansion of the wastewater treatment system. 4. Fire Protection: Fire protection and emergency medical response services for the project vicinity are provided by San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (SRVFPD). The SRVFPD submi tted comments on the project application detailing requirements for emergency access, water supply, weed abatement, and SRVFPD review of building permit submittals, amongst other items. Currently, no development is included in this project. However, prior to submittal of building permits for any future development, the project plans CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 2 of 23 would be need to be reviewed and approved by the SRVFPD. As a result, potential impacts of the project on fire protection services would be less than significant. 5. Public Protection: Police protection services in the project vicinity are provided by the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office, through the Valley Station, located approximately 10.5 miles driving distance to the north of the project site. Public protection standards under Policy 4 -c of the Growth Management Program (GMP) of the County General Plan require a Sheriff facility standard of 155 square feet of station area and support facilities per 1,000 in population shall be maintained within the unincorporated area of th e County. The project would not induce a significant population increase within the County that would equal or exceed 1,000 persons. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property, which would directly increase the unincorporated San Ramon area population by an estimated three people, based on the Census 2010 estimate of 2.77 people per household for Contra Costa County. Therefore, the project will not increase the Sheriff or support facility requirements for the area. 6. Parks and Recreation: Parks and recreation standards under the GMP require three acres of neighborhood park area per 1,000 in population. The project would not induce a significant population increase within the County that would equal or exceed 1,000 persons. Although no devel opment is included, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property, which would directly increase the unincorporated San Ramon area population by an estimated three people, based on the Census 2010 estimate of 2.77 people per household for Contra Costa County. Furthermore, the applicant would be required to pay a Park Impact Fee for each new residence, which is used to acquire parkland and develop parks and recreation facilities to serve new residential development in the unincorporated areas of the County. Thus, there would be a less than significant impact from this project on the use of the local public parks and recreational facilities by residents of the San Ramon area. 7. Flood Control and Drainage: The project lies within the 0.02% Zone X flood boundary as designated on the Federal Emergency Flood Rate Maps. No special requirements per the Federal Flood Insurance Program or the County Flood Plain Management Ordinance (Ordinance No. 2000 -33) are applicable to future construction of any structures on this property. CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 3 of 23 Division 914 of the County Ordinance Code requires that all storm water entering and/or originating on this property to be collected and conveyed, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage system, to an adequate natural watercourse having a definable bed and banks or to an existing adequate public storm drainage system which conveys the storm water to an adequate natural watercourse. PWD has stated that review of a final SWCP is required prior to construction of improvements. Conformance of the proposed project with this PWD requirement would ensure that there would not be any significant risk due to an increase in the project-related volume of runoff that would result in onsite or off -site flooding. B. Rezoning Findings 1. Required Finding: The change proposed will substantially comply with the General Plan. Project Finding: The intent of the SL designation is to maintain low -density single-family residential neighborhoods. This designation allows a range of 1.0 and 2.9 single-family units per net acre. Sites can be as large as 43,560 square feet. Primary land uses permitted in this designation include detached single- family homes and accessory buil dings and structures. After the proposed rezoning and subdivision of the property, Parcel B would remain consistent with the S L designation. This designation allows 1.0-2.9 units per net acre. The subdivision of the subject 69.34 -acre parcel into two parcels, with a calculated density of approximately 0.04 units per net acre when using the General Plan’s 75% calculation, and if Parcel B were to be developed in the future, it would meet the intent, as it would allow one residence on the one new parcel. Thus, the potential for future development of a residence on Parcel B is consistent with the existing density in the area and with the SL General Plan designation. The project also satisfies numerous policies, such as the County’s Ranchette Policy, Policy 3-9, 3-28 and 3-29 regarding utilizing vacant properties in areas where the project would not create severe unmitigated adverse impacts on the environment or existing communities. Therefore, the project would be consistent with the SL General Plan designation. 2. Required Finding: The uses authorized or proposed in the land use district are compatible within the district and to uses authorized in adjacent district. CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 4 of 23 Project Finding: The subject property is located within both the Agricultural Lands (AL) and the Single-Family Residential Low Density (SL) General Plan Land Use designations, as well as the Agricultural Preserve (A-4) Zoning District. The land to the northeast, west and s outh of the property are established open space and agricultural lands, and the area adjacent to the southeast of the subject property is the Norris Canyon Estates residential development. The rezoning of Parcel B from A-4 to A-20 is consistent with the surrounding area. The purpose of the A-20 zoning district is to provide and protect areas for agricultural uses by preventing the establishment of urban and any other incompatible land uses thereon, and the land uses allowed are all agricultural in nature. The subject property is already surrounded by agricultural and residential properties. Although there is no development included as a part of this project, development consistent with the A -20 zoning district would be consistent with surrounding agricultura l and residential uses. Overall, the project is in harmony with the surrounding area and the uses established in the area. 3. Required Finding: Community need has been demonstrated for the use proposed, but this does not require demonstration of future finan cial success. Project Finding: The two-lot subdivision is located within an area that is composed of both agricultural lands and single-family residential development. The property currently has one residence on Parcel A, Parcel B is currently vacant, and no development is proposed in this project. The subdivision of the property would potentially allow for one additional single- family residence, and this new residence would be located in an area designated as Single Family Residential – Low Density in the General Plan, which is an allowed use. Overall, the project is consistent with the surrounding area consisting of single-family residential and agricultural development. C. Tentative Map Findings 1. Required Finding: The advisory agency shall not approve a tentative map unless it finds that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the applicable general plan required by law. Project Finding: The subject property is located within both the Agricu ltural Lands (AL) and the Single-Family Residential Low Density (SL) General Plan Land Use designations, as well as the Agricultural Preserve (A-4) Zoning CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 5 of 23 District. The project would result in creating a new parcel within the SL designation, known as Parcel B. Although no development is included in this project, upon subdividing and rezoning Parcel B to A-20, one single-family residence and associated structures allowed by the A-20 zoning district could be developed on the new parcel. Development of a singl e-family residence and associated accessory structures is consistent with the SL designation. Parcel A would continue to be utilized for grazing a nd/or similar agricultural uses. According to its Williamson Act contract, the proposed Parcel A would continue to be utilized for cattle grazing and dry farming, and would thus remain in compliance with the intent and purpose of the AL designation. The project also satisfies numerous policies, such as the County’s Ranchette Policy, Policy 3 -9, 3-28 and 3 -29 regarding utilizing vacant properties in areas where the project would not create severe unmitigated adverse impacts on the environment or existing communities. Thus, the project is consistent with the applicable policies for the AL and SL land use designations. 2. Required Finding: The advisory agency shall not approve a tentative map unless it shall find that the proposed subdivision fulfills construction requirements. Project Finding: The project will comply with the collect and convey regulations, storm drainage facilities, and design standards for private roads. Additionally , compliance with the California Building Code and all applicable County Ordinances is required for grading of the property and construction of any future agricultural or residential buildings. D. Variance Findings 1. Required Finding: That any variance authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations of other properties in the vicinity and the respective land use district. Project Finding: The project involves the subdivision of the subj ect 69.34 -acre parcel into two new parcels. These two new parcels are proposed as Parcel A and Parcel B, with 38.38 acres and 30.96 acres of total area, respectively, and no development is proposed as part of this project. The proposed project also includes a variance to allow proposed Parcel A to have a total area of 38.38 acres, where the A-4 district requires a minimum of 40 acres. Although undersized for A-4, it remains in compliance with the minimum front, side and rear setbacks for the existing buildi ngs, as well as the intended agricultural CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 6 of 23 uses to be preserved on-site through the existing Williamson Act contract. Additionally, the contract in its current form also only covers the 38.38 acres proposed for Parcel A, as the area of Parcel B was previously removed from the program. The A-4 district also requires a minimum average width of 300 feet and depth of 300 feet. Parcel A has an average width of 1,295 feet and a depth of 1,291 feet. As such, Parcel A would be substantially compliant with the A-4 district and would not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations of other properties in the vicinity and the respective land use district. 2. Required Finding: That because of special circumstances applicable to the subject property because of its size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the respective zoning regulations is found to deprive the subject property of rights enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and within the identical land use district. Project Finding: The proposal to subdivide the 69.34-acre property would deprive the subject property of rights enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and within the identical land use district. Overall, the project is compatible with the surrounding development in the area consisting of single- family residential and agricultural uses. The subject 69.34 -acre property is bisected by Norris Canyon Road, but it is a single parcel. San Catanio Creek is adjacent to the south of Norris Canyon Road and runs parallel to it. The northern half of the property contains a single-family residence in the northeast corner with associated accessory structures and improvements, while the southern half is vacant. Additionally, the Williamson Act contract in its current form also only covers the 38.38 acres proposed for Parcel A, as the area of Parcel B was previously removed from the program. With the bisection by Norris Canyon Road and the agricultural preserve portion of the property to be maintained, implementing the current zoning standards would deprive the subject property of rights enjoyed by other properties developed as multiple-family development. 3. Required Finding: That any variance authorized substantially meets the intent and purpose of the respective land use district in which the subject property is located. Project Finding: The proposal to allow proposed Parcel A to have a total area of 38.38 acres, where the A-4 district requires a minimum of 40 acres will meet the intent of the A-4 Zoning District. the two parcels would remain consistent CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 7 of 23 with the AL and SL designations. Parcel A would continue to be utilized for grazing and/or similar agricultural uses, and Parcel B could potentially be developed with a single-family residence. According to its Williamson Act contract, the proposed Parcel A would continue to be utilized for cattle grazing and dry farming, and would thus remain in compliance with the intent and purpose of the Agricultural Preserve District (A-4). E. Findings for Granting an Exception to the Subdivision Ordinance (Title 9) Requirements The project’s applicant, P/A Design Resources, Inc., submitted an exception request letter dated January 29, 2020 , requesting an exception from Chapter 96 - 10 “Underground Utilities” of the County Ordinance Code. Pursuant to Section 92.6002, minor exceptions can be granted when the required findings can be made. 1. Required Finding: That there are unusual circumstances or conditions affecting the property. Project Finding: The 30.96 -acre project site, Parcel B, contains approximately 950 linear feet of frontage along Norris Canyon and just as much along Ashbourne Drive. As this condition is existing, it is an unusual circumstance/condition affecting this property , and, therefore the finding can be made to grant the requested exception. 2. Required Finding: That the exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Project Finding: The project site, Parcel B, contains approximately 950 linear feet of frontage along Norris Canyon and just as much along Ashborne Drive. Requiring the undergrounding of utilities to a project site within the 30.96 - acre parcel would place an undue burden on the property owner inconsistent with the requirements of similar projects. 3. Required Finding: That the granting of the exception will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in th e territory in which the property is situated. As such, the exception is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Project Finding: Existing utilities in the area are typically above-grade and do CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 8 of 23 not interfere with public access or travel along Norris Canyon Road and surrounding areas. As such, the project will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the territory in which the property is situated. II. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR COUNTY FILES #MS18-0008 & RZ19-3249 1. Tentative Map approval is granted, based on the following documents received by the Community Development Division (CDD):  Application and materials submitted to the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division (CDD) on July 31, 2018 ;  Revised Tentative Map, prepared by P/A Design Resources , received on October 29, 2018 ; 2. Approval is granted to allow for the following variances that meet the requirements of Section 26 -2.2006 of the County Ordinance Code: A. A total area of 38.38 acres for Parcel A (where the A-4 district requires a minimum of 40 acres). 3. The maximum number of lots approved for this subdivision is two (2) parcels. Approval Contingent on Consistent Approval of Related Rezoning Application 4. This subdivision is approved contingent upon approval of a rezoning request for Parcel B, County File #RZ1 9-3249 from Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) to Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20). If the site is not rezoned, then this approval shall be null and void. Application Fees 5. This application is subject to an i nitial application deposit of $7 ,9 00, which was paid with the application submittal, plus time and materials costs if the application review expenses exceed 100% if the initial deposit. Any additional costs due must be paid within 60 days of the permit effective date or prior to use of the permit, whichever occurs first. The applicant may obtain current CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 9 of 23 costs by contacting the project planner. If you owe additional fees, a bill will be sent to you shortly after permit issuance. Indemnification 6. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66474.9, the applicant (including the subdivider or any agent thereof) shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the County, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the Agency (the County) or its agents, officers, or employees, to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the Agency’s approval concerning this subdivision map application, which action is brought within the time period provided in Section 66499.37. The County will promptl y notify the subdivider of any such claim, action, or proceeding and cooperate full in the defense. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, or issuance of grading or building permits, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit the indemnification agreement between the applicant and Contra Costa County for the review and approval of CDD. Compliance Report 7. At least 45 days prior to recordation of th e Parce l Map, the applicant shall provide a permit compliance report to the Department of Conservati on and Development, Community Development Division (CDD) for review and approval. The report shall identify all conditions of approval that are administered by the CDD. The report shall document the measures taken by the applicant to satisfy all relevant conditions. Copies of the permit conditions may be obtained from the CDD. Unless otherwise indicated, the applicant will be required to demonstrate compliance with the applicable conditions of this report prior to filing the Final Map. The permit compliance review is subject to staff time and materials charges, with an initial deposit of $1,000 or the deposit amount at the time of submittal, which shall be paid at the time of submittal of the compliance report. On-Site Water CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 10 of 23 8. Prior to filing of the Parcel Map, the applicant shall comply with the following for Parcel B: A. Provide evidence from East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) that suitable water service is available for this parcel; or, B. Have an "on site" producing w ater well or install a "test well" having a minimum yield of three gallons per minute with bacterial and chemical quality in compliance with the State standards for a pure, wholesome and potable water supply (Title 22, Section 64433). If the chemical analy sis exceeds the State standards for "maximum contaminant levels" for water potability, a statement must be attached and "run with the deed" advising of these levels; or, C. Have verifiable water availability data from adjacent parcels presented by the applicant, or knowledge of the same, known by the Health Services Department concerning water quality and quantity per (a) above; and, have a statement that "attaches and runs with the deed" indicating that a water well shall be installed on the subject parcel complying with the general requirements stated above prior to obtaining a Conservation and Development Department permit for construction. Aesthetics 9. Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the project sponsor shall identify a building envelope on Parcel B, subject to the review and approval of CDD. This building envelope shall be limited to two acres in total area and shall be located in such a way as to minimize visual impacts as viewed from Norris Canyon Road. (MM AES-1) 10. Prior to the submittal of building permits on Parcel B, the project sponsor shall submit the proposed plans for the review and approval of CDD. In addition to architectural plans for the development, the plans shall include screening elements to minimize visual impacts as viewed from Norris Canyon Road. (MM AES-2) Biological Resources CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 11 of 23 11. Prior to the submittal of building permits or any ground disturbance activities, the project sponsor shall employ a biologist familiar with State - and Federally- protected wildlife and plant species native to the Contra Costa County area shall conduct a preconstruction survey to assess the site’s biological resources. This study shall identify all pr otected wildlife and plant species and provide mitigation measures to preserve these resources. These mitigation measures shall be implemented by the project sponsor and be monitored by the consulting biologist throughout construction of the project. (MM BIO-1) 12. The following general avoidance and minimization measures shall be implemented throughout the construction activities to avoid potential impacts to sensitive biological resources. (MM BIO-2) A. All staging, maintenance, and storage of construction equipment will be performed in a manner to preclude any direct or indirect discharge of fuel, oil, or other petroleum products into waters of the U.S./State. No other debris, rubbish, creosote-treated wood, soil, silt, sand, cement, concrete or washings thereof, or other construction-related materials or wastes will be allowed to enter into or be placed where they may be washed by rainfall or runoff into waters of the U.S./State. All such debris and waste shall be picked-up daily and properly disposed of at an appropriate site. B. All food-related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps will be disposed of in closed containers and removed at least once a day from the project site. C. No firearms will be allowed on the project site except f or those carried by authorized security personnel, or local, State, or Federal law enforcement officials. D. Project personnel shall not have dogs or cats in the project area. E. Project personnel will not be permitted to smoke in the project area. F. No pesticides of any kind will be used on the project site at any time during project implementation. G. No equipment will be operated in areas of flowing or standing water. No fueling, cleaning, or maintenance of vehicles or equipment will take place within any areas where an accidental discharge to waters of the U.S./State CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 12 of 23 waters may occur. H. All equipment including excavators, trucks, hand tools, etc., that may have come in contact with invasive plants or the seeds of these plants, will be carefully cleaned before arriving on the site and shall also be carefully cleaned before removal from the site to prevent spread of these plants. I. Disturbance or removal of vegetation will not exceed the minimum necessary to complete construction. J. To minimize harassment, injury, death, and harm in the form of temporary habitat disturbances, all project-related vehicle traffic will be restricted to established roads, construction areas, equipment staging, parking, and stockpile areas. K. Along the length of the onsite portion of San Catanio Creek, the work area will be delineated with orange silt fencing in order to minimize impacts to habitat beyond the work limit. This fencing will remain in place until all ground moving operations have ceased. Orange cyclone fencing, or other materials that can entrap small amphibians and reptiles and other small wildlife species, will not be used. L. For each onsite tree proposed for preservation, a root protection zone will be established, extending from the trunk to the dripline (the outer e xtent of the tree canopy). This root protection zone will be fenced off from the work area with construction fencing in order to protect the preserved trees from inadvertent damage due to ground moving, compaction, and/or limb removal within the footprint of the dripline. Park Impact Fee 13. Concurrently with filing the Parcel Map , the applicant shall submit three (3) copies of a proposed deed disclosure statement for the review and approval of the CDD. The disclosure statement shall be used to notify prospective buyers of parcels which are not occupied by existing legally -established residences at the time of filing the Parcel Map, that prior to issuance of a building permit, they will be required to pay a park impact fee. The current park dedication fee is $8,129.00 per residential unit. However, the actual fee amount collected wi ll be that which is applicable at the time of building permit issuance. The approved deed disclosure shall be recorded concurrently with the deed for each approved parcel. CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 13 of 23 Park Dedication Fee 14. Prior to submittal of a building permit for a new residence , the applicant shall pay the applicable park dedication fee as established by the Board of Supervisors. Child Care 15. Concurrently with filing the Parcel Map , the applicant shall submit a proposed deed disclosure statement for the review and approval of the CDD. The disclosure statement shall be used to notify prospective buyers of parcels which are not occupied by existing legally -established residences at the time of filing the Parcel Map, that prior to issuance of a building permit, they will be required to pay a per parcel fee toward childcare facility needs in the area as established by the Board of Supervisors. The current childcare fee is $400 per parcel . However, the actual fee amount collected will be that which is applicable at the time of building permit issuance. The approved deed disclosure shall be recorded concurrently with the deeds for each approved parcel. Cultural Resources 16. If deposits of prehistoric or historical archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbance activities, all work within 30 yards of these materials shall be stopped until a professional archaeologist who is certified by the Society for California Archaeology (SCA) and/or the Society of Professional Archaeology (SOPA), and the Native American tribe that has requested consultation and/or demonstrated interest in the project site, have had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation(s) if deemed necessary. (MM CUL-1) 17. If the deposits are not eligible, avoidance is not necessary. If the deposits are eligible, they will need to be avoided by impacts or such impacts must be mitigated. Upon completion of the archaeological assessment, a report should be prepared documenting the methods, results, and recommendations. The report should be submitted to the Northwest Information Center and appropriate Contra Costa County agencies. Prehistoric materials can include flake-stone tools (e.g., projectile points, knives, choppers) or obsidian, chert, or quartzite tool -making debris; culturally darkened soil (i.e., midden soil often containing heat-affected rock, ash and charcoal, CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 14 of 23 shellfish remains, and cultural materials); and stone milling equipment (e.g., mortars, pestles, handstones). Historical materials can include wood, stone, concrete, or adobe footings, walls and other structural remains; debris -filled wells or privies; and deposits of wood, glass ceramics, and other ref use. (MM CUL-2) 18. If human remains are encountered, work within 50 feet of the discovery should be redirected and the County Coroner notified immediately. At the same time, an archaeologist should be contacted to assess the situation. If the human remains are of a Native American origin, the Coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours of this identification. The Native American Heritage Commission will identify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) to inspect the property and provide recommendations for the proper treatment of the remains and associated grave goods. Upon completion of the assessment, the archaeologist should prepare a report documenting the methods and results, and provide recommendations for the treatment of the human remains and any associated cultural materials, as appropriate and in coordination with the recommendations of the MLD. The report should be submitted to the Northwest Information Center and appropriate Contra Costa agencies. (MM CUL-3) Geology and Soi ls 19. At least 60 days prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit a geology, soil, and foundation report that meets the requirements of Subdivision Ordinance Section 94 -4.420 for review by the County Peer Review Geologist, and review and approval by the CDD. Improvement, grading, and building plans shall carry out the recommendations of the approved report. This report shall include evaluation of: (i) based on adequate subsurface exploration, laboratory testing and engineering analysis, the required investigation shall include evaluation of potential hazards and provide appropriate recommendations to mitigate any significant hazards that are confirmed to be present (i.e. landslide, liquefaction, slope creep, expansive and corrosive soils). Detailed design recommendations shall be provided, including (ii) clearing and grading (iii) residential driveway design, (iii) residential foundation design, (iv) drainage, (v) C.3 basin design/ construction, (vi) undergrounding of utilities (particularly within landslide areas), and (vii) operative California Building Code seismic design parameters. (MM GEO-1) CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 15 of 23 20. During site grading, drainage and foundation-related work, the project geotechnical engineer shall provide observation and testing services to ensure that the construction is in compliance with recommendations in the approved geotechnical report. The project geotechnical engineer shall provide recommendations for any modification to approved plans that are deemed necessary based on the actual field conditions encountered during grading. Written approval from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Divi sion shall be obtained prior to any modification. Documentation of the observation and testing services, as well as other project details shall be presented in a final geotechnical report, to be submitted to the County and kept on file. (MM GEO-2) 21. Prior to recording the Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit a deed disclosure related to the potential ground failure hazards (liquefaction and landslide), and shall include complete bibliographic citation to the 2000 and 2003 Geologic Feasibility Investigations of Berlogar Geotechnical Consultants, indicate where a copy of these reports can be accessed. Submit a draft of the proposed language to be used in the Deed Disclosure for review and approval by CDD. This review shall be for the purpose that the language used adequately characterizes the hazard posed by ground failure and adverse soils conditions. Following approval of the language, that applicant shall record the deed disclosure and shall provide a copy of the recorded deed disclosure to the CDD. (MM GEO-3) 22. At the time of application for a building or grading permit, whichever occurs first, a construction period erosion and sedimentation control plan that is in compliance with applicable construction period requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board shall be included in the submitted construction drawings, and implemented during construction. (MM GEO-4) Noise 23. To reduce potential construction noise impacts, the following mul ti -part mitigation measure shall be implemented for the project, and shall be stated on the face of all construction plans (MM Noise -1): A. The applicant shall make a good faith effort to minimize project-related disruptions to adjacent properties, and to us es on the site. This shall be communicated to all project-related contractors. CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 16 of 23 B. The applicant shall require their contractors and subcontractors to fit all internal combustion engines with mufflers which are in good condition and shall locate stationary noise-generating equipment such as air compressors as far away from existing residences as possible. C. Large trucks and heavy equipment are subject to the same restrictions that are imposed on construction activities, except that the hours are limited to 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM. D. All construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and are prohibited on state and federal holidays on the calendar dates that these holidays are observed by the state or federal government as listed below: New Year’s Day (State and Federal) Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. (State and Federal) Washington’s Birthday (Federal) Lincoln’s Birthday (State) President’s Day (State and Federal) Cesar Chavez Day (State) Memorial Day (State and Federal) Independence Day (State and Federal) Labor Day (State and Federal) Columbus Day (State and Federal) Veterans Day (State and Federal) Thanksgiving Day (State and Federal) Day after Thanksgiving (State) Christmas Day (State and Federal) For specific details on the actual day the state and federal holidays occur, please visit the following websites: Federal: http://www.opm.gov/Operating_Status_Schedules/fedhol/2020 .asp California: http://www.ftb.ca.gov/aboutFTB/holidays.shtml Police Services 24. Concurrently with filing the Parcel Map , the applicant shall submit two copies of a proposed deed disclosure statement for the review and approval of the CDD. CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 17 of 23 The approved statement shall be used to notify prospective buyers of parcels which are not occupied by existing legally -established residences at the time of filing the Parcel Map, that prior to issuance of a building permit, they will be required to contribute $1,000.00 to the County f or police services mitigation. The fee may be paid to the Contra Costa County Application and Permit Center. The approved deed disclosure shall be recorded concurrently with the deed for each approved parcel. 25. Prior to issuance of a building or grading pe rmit on any parcel that is not occupied by a legal residence ; the applicant shall contribute $1,000.00 to the County for police services mitigation. The fee shall be paid to the Contra Costa County Application and Permit Center. Debris Recovery 26. Prior to Permit Issuance, developer shall submit Construction Waste Management Plan, which identifies approved methods to comply with CalGreen requirement to recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65%, or current CalGreen mandate, of construction and demolition (C&D) waste materials generated at jobsite. 27. Prior to Final Inspection, developer shall submit Construction Waste Management Final Report containing information and supporting documentation that demonstrates compliance with CalGreen requirement to recycle and/or salvage for reuse a minimum of 65%, or current CalGreen mandate, of C&D waste materials generated at jobsite. PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SUBDIVISION MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Applicant shall comply with the requirements of Title 8, Title 9 and Title 10 of the Ordinance Code. Any exception(s) must be stipulated in these Conditions of Approval. Conditions of Approval are based on the vesting tentative map/development plan submitted to the Department of Conservation and Development on October 29, 2018. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO FILING OF THE FINAL MAP. General Requirements CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 18 of 23 28. In accordance with Section 92 -2.006 of the Ordinance Code, this subdivision shall conform to all applicable provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance (Title 9). Any exceptions therefrom must be specifically listed in this conditional approval statement. The drainage, road and utility improvements outlined below shall require the review and approval of the Public Works Department and are based on the Vesting Tentative Map received by the Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division, on October 29, 2018 . 29. Improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer shall be submitted, if necessary, to the Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division, along with review and inspection fees, and security for all improvements required by the Ordinance Code for the conditions of approval of this subdivision. Any necessary traffic signing and striping shall be included in the improvement plans for review by the Transportation Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. Roadway Improvements (Norris Canyon/Ashbourne Drive ) 30. Applicant shall locate any vehicular entrance gates a minimum of 20 feet from edge of pavement to allow vehicles to queue without obstructing through traffic. Sufficient area shall be provided outside any gate to allow a vehicle to turn around and re-enter Norris Canyon Road in a forward direction . 31. Applicant shall pave the first 50 feet of all new driveways, measured from the existing edge of pavement of Norris Canyon Road or Ashbourne Drive into the property, to allow vehicles to pull completely off of the roadway and still remain on a paved surface, and to prevent dust, gravel, and debris from spilling onto Norris Canyon Road or Ashbourne Drive. Encroachment Permit 32. Applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Application and Permit Center for construction of driveways or other improvements within the right -of- way of Norris Canyon Road. Abutter’s Rights CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 19 of 23 33. Applicant shall relinquish abutter’s rights of access along Norris Canyon Road with the exception of the existing driveway serving Parcel A. Road Alignment/Intersection Design/Sight Distance Sight Distance 34. Applicant shall provide sight distance at the i ntersection of the private driveways with Norris Canyon Road and Ashbourne Drive in accordance with Chapter 82 - 18 “Sight Obstructions at Intersections” of the County Ordinance Code. The applicant shall trim vegetation, as necessary, to provide sight distan ce at this intersection, and any new signage, landscaping, fencing, retaining walls, or other obstructions proposed at this intersection shall be set back to ensure that the sight line is clear of any obstructions . Street Lights 35. Applicant shall annex Parcel A into the Community Facilities District (CFD) 2010 - 1 formed for Countywide Street Light Financing. Annexation into a street light service area does not include the transfer of ownership and maintenance of street lighting on private roads. Utilities/Undergrounding 36. Applicant shall underground all new and existing utility distribution facilities, including those along the frontage of Norris Canyon Road. The developer shall provide joint trench composite plans for the underground electrical, gas, telephone, cable television and communication conduits and cables including the size, location and details of all trenches, locations of building utility service stubs and meters and placements or arrangements of junction structures as a part of the Improvement Plan submittals for the project. The composite drawings and/or utility improvement plans shall be signed by a licensed civil engineer. Exception (Subject to Advisory Agency findings and approval) Applicant is granted an exception from the undergrounding requirements of the Ordinance Code relative to existing facilities due to the rural nature of the area and to be consistent with standards imposed on similar large-lot agricultural CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 20 of 23 subdivisions. New services to serve Parcel B shall are still required to be installed underground. Drainage Improvements Collect and Convey 37. The applicant shall collect and convey all stormwater entering and/or originating on this property, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage system, to an adequate natural watercourse having definable bed and banks, or to an existing adequate public storm drainage system which conveys the storm waters to an adequate natural watercourse, in accordance with Division 914 of the Ordinance Code. Hold Harmless 38. The property owner shall be aware that the creek banks on the site are potentially unstable. The property owner shall execute a recordable agreement with the County which states that the developer and the property owner and the future property owner(s) will hold harmless Contra Costa County and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District in the event of damage to the on-site and off-site improvements as a result of creek bank failure or erosion. Miscellaneous Drainage Requirements 39. The applicant shall design and construct all storm drainage facilities in compliance with the Ordinance Code and Public Works Department design standards. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES ) 40. The applicant shall be required to comply with all rules, regulations and procedures of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) for municipal, construction and industrial activities as promulgated by the California State Water Resour ces Control Board, or any of its Regional Water Quality Control Boards (San Francisco Bay - Region II). Compliance shall include developing long-term best management practices (BMPs) for the reduction or elimination of stormwater pollutants. The project CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 21 of 23 design shall incorporate wherever feasible, the following long-term BMPs in accordance with the Contra Costa Clean Water Program for the site's stormwater drainage: A. Minimize the amount of directly connected impervious surface area. B. Install approved full trash capture devices on all catch basins (excluding catch basins within bioretention basins) as reviewed and approved by Public Works Department. Trash capture devices shall meet the requirements of the County’s NPDES permits. C. Place advisory warnings on all catch basins and storm drains using current storm drain markers. D. Construct concrete driveway weakened plane joints at angles to assist in directing run-off to landscaped/pervious areas prior to entering the street curb and gutter. E. Shallow roadside and on-site swales. F. Other alternatives comparable to the above as approved by the Public Works Department. Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance 41. The applicant shall not be subject to the requirements of Provision C.3 of the County Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, since the proposed project will not create or replace at least 10,000 square feet of impervious surface. However, the project is subject to all other provisions of the County Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (§1014, Ordinance No. 2005 -01) and future development applications on the subject parcel may be required to comply with Provision C.3. ADVISORY NOTES ADVISORY NOTES ARE ATTACHED TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, BUT ARE NOT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. ADVISORY NOTES ARE PROVIDED IN ORDER TO INFORM THE APPLICANT OF ADDITIONAL REGULATIONS, ORDINANCES, AND REQUIREMENTS THAT MAY BE APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT. CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 22 of 23 A. NOTICE OF 90-DAY OPPORTUNITY TO PROTEST FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS, OR OTHER EXACTIONS PERTAINING TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT. This notice is intended to advise the applicant that pursuant to Government Code Section 66000, et seq., the applicant has the opportunity to pr otest fees, dedications, reservations, and/or exactions required as part of this project approval. The opportunity to protest is limited to a 90 -day period after the project is approved. The ninety (90) day period, in which you may protest the amount of any fee or the imposition of any dedication, reservation, or other exaction required by this approved permit, begins on the date this permit was approved. To be valid, a protest must be in writing pursuant to Government Code Section 66020 and delivered to the Department of Conservation and Development within 90 days of the approval date of this permit. B. The applicant will be required to comply with the requirements of the Bridge/Thoroughfare Fee Ordinance for the South County, Tri-Valley, SCC Sub Regional and SCC Regional Areas of Benefit as adopted by the Board of Supervisors. C. This project may be subject to the requirements of the Department of Fish and Wildlife. It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the Department of Fish and Wildlife, P.O. Box 47, Yountville, California 94599, of any proposed construction within this development that may affect any fish and wildlife resources, per the Fish and Wildlife Code. D. This project may be subject to the requirements of the Army Corps of Engineers. It is the applicant's responsibility to notify the appropriate district of the Corps of Engineers to determine if a permit is required, and if it can be obtained. E. Further development of the parcel may need to comply with the latest Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (§1014) and Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. This compliance may require a Stormwater Control Plan and an Operations and Maintenance Plan prepared in accordance with the latest edition of the Stormwater C.3 Guidebook. Compliance may also require annexation of the subject property into the Community Facilities District 2007-1 (Stormwater Management Facilities) and entering into a standard CPC – February 12, 2020 County File # MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Findings and COAs Page 23 of 23 Stormwater Managem ent Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement with Contra Costa County. F. This project is subject to the development fees in effect under County Ordinance as of November 28, 201 8, the date the vesting tentative map application was accepted as complete by the Department of Conservation and Development. These fees are in addition to any other development fees , which may specified in the conditions of approval. G. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the following agencies: - Contra Costa County Building Inspection Division - Contra Costa County Public Works Department - Contra Costa Environmental Health Division - East Bay Municipal Utility District - Central Contra Costa Sanitary District Norris Canyon RdAshbourneDr L y ndhurst Pl S ta rcro s s D rA-4 P-1 P-1 ORDINANCE NO._____________ (Re-Zoning Land in the __________________________ Area) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows: Page ________________ of the County's 2005 Zoning Map (Ord. No. 2005-03) is amended by re-zoning the land in the above area shown shaded on the map(s) attached hereto and incorporated herein (see also Department of Conservation and Development File No. _____________________ .) FROM: Land Use District ______________ (_______________________________________) TO: Land Use District ______________ (_______________________________________) and the Department of Conservation and Development Director shall change the Zoning Map accordingly, pursuant to Ordinance Code Sec. 84.2.002. This ordinance becomes effective 30 days after passage, and within 15 days of passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors voting for and against it in the __________________________________ , a newspaper published in this County. PASSED on ________________by the following vote: Supervisor SECTION II. EFFECTIVE DATE. SECTION I: Aye No Absent Abstain 1. J. Gioia ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2. C. Andersen ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 3. D. Burgis ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 4. K. Mitchoff ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 5. F.D. Glover ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ATTEST: David Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors __________________________________________________ Chairman of the Board By__________________________________, Dep. (SEAL) ORDINANCE NO._____________ RZ19-3249 - R. Ross Avedian - P/A Design Resources, Inc. 2020 - 06 Norris Canyon X-15 RZ19-3249 A-4 A-20 (Agricultural Preserve) (Exclusive Agriculture) 2020 - 06 ASSESSOR’S MAP CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,CALIF. BOOK PAGE211 21 X-15 PURPOSES ONLY. NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED FOR THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION NOTE: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT DELINEATED HEREON. ASSESSOR’S PARCELS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH LOCAL LOT SPLIT OR BUILDING SITE ORDINANCES. 1 2 2 1 1 "A" "C" STA. #70-1 STA. #70-A STA. #70 W. LANE 10’ EASE. CTR. NORRIS CANYON RD. STA.#69 NO R R I S CANY O N 2 "A" "D" 117.01Ac. 1.818Ac. LOT 2 LOT 1 210 22 210 17 16 2120 18 17 2019 W. LN FREITAS 4848 O.R. 141 PCL.2 COUNTYLINE387.06 R=967 155. 4 3 R=333 N78^2 5 ’ W327.381262. 7 5 1290.73N52^5 2 ’ 1 5 " E N02^0’WR=1033 274.17 65.6 R=633 119.43 N53^25’37"E 2328.48 N89^27’34"W N89^27’34"W 860.12 2188.56N50^23’7"E 442.10 129.49 R=133 1272.931668.02398.10309.34N19^18’WN2 9 ^ 3 9 ’ 5 0 "W 2 4 7 7 . 1 6 .23Ac.200.0 50.0S5^39’15"WS86^08’52"E S3^51’08"WS4 4 ^ 3 5 ’ 4 5 " E 24 1 5 . 9 7 38 7 . 1 32604.71N02^42’27"EN70 ^ 2 ’ 1 9 " W 156 0 . 0 5828.9N10^9’32"E77.34 768.3635.75N81^22’40"E 1024.90 N31^21’46"EN5^01’43"WN63 ^ 0 7 ’ 5 4 "WN11^53’58"WR=1 6 3 217.6 25 1 . 7 8 128 . 1 3 191.51115.32 90.86 N89^29’W (TIE)N0^31’EN81^22’40"E 2626.09 219. 9 6 515.12 N.D.S74^52’W S25^0’59"W139.46R=273 294.64 N.D. N.B. 1 9 4 . 6 4 52 6 . 1 7 16 5372.03211.6N6 3 ^ 5 0 ’ 3 9 "W 555 .6 9 09 17 29 14 75 54 55 58 57 78 80 1"=800’ TI E 4 2 1 4 . 3 6 t o T P O B A S H B O U R N E D R STARCROSS D R LYNDHURST PLWENTWOOD DR24 25 26 "E" 82 45 84 "C-2""D" COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA COMMON AREA N0^31’E 1694.524 8 9 .7 2 235.71 366.25 42 5 . 9 4 332.2423 4 . 4 119 0 .8 9 216.3 0 R = 1 5 2 4 82 4 . 4 61317.56A A A A A A A A A A 24 "F-3" 1109.66S89^4’30"E S 2 6 ^ 4 2 ’ 5 2 "W N89^4’30"W 1429.13 04 209 A L A M E D A C O U N T Y C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y 23 35 07 209 65 59 S 2 6 ^ 3 5 ’ 3 1 " E 9 9 9 . 9 6 414.37659.66450 N80^29’3 9 " W 496.01 158.70 408.27151.76128.70N.D.63 81 "D" "B-1" "A""U" 64 28.28AC 28 29 136 245.15130.1320 2 . 4 0 124.463 3 7 . 8 9 206.35 190.56 231.18 2 9 6 . 5 3264.28 174.24165.95217408.45 2217.65 733.45 220.3 3173. 80 15 0 . 8 4170.89R= 7 2 6 519.80 B B B B B B BB B B COMMON AREA 3 4 8 0 . 2 0 349.08 S63^1 5 ’ 5 2 " W 5 4 3 . 9 2N2 9 ^ 9 ’ 2 5 "W624.93N59^57’40"W 1125.71 S81^33’3"W 2 2 7 . 3 2 N 4 1 ^ 5 ’ 1 3 " W 279.18N7^10’27"W322.68165.7586.26 86.62 87.11 86.27 85.16 FROM PAGE 23 68 32.18Ac. 67 61.19Ac. 31 32 33 34 "L" TRACT 7998 74 C C C C PCL "L" TR 7998 C 2 4 2 . 6 0R=1 4 8 7 218.15406.202- 36 37 38 83 "S" TRACT 7996 23 EBMUD SEE PG. 38 FOR PCL. NO. D D D D POR TRACT 7578 POR TRACT 7575 POR SEC 17,18,19,20&21 T2S R1W MDBM TR 7996 MB 473-46 TR 7996 1/31/05 EB REG PARK DIST 74.77Ac MB 438-38 219.38 257.83N24^3’54"E12/5/75 5/5/88 41PM21 133PM8 1- MB 438-38 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE IV) 1/28/02 6.51Ac.FM 209-5 1/17/02 POR "D" 77.80Ac 67.052Ac 23 30 MB 432-30 75.54Ac 8-06-01 1.112Ac MB 415-4 9-13-99 91.48Ac POR "B" 30.96Ac 36.02Ac 38.363Ac 1.01Ac TRACT 8566 1-28-09 MB 508-45 138.85Ac 93.42Ac 12.45Ac 20.08Ac POR "B" RD 7.64Ac 19.13Ac 1-28-02 S2^49’38"W65.08 132.94 11.65 301.16S73^19’40"W A- B- C- D-MB 473-46 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES PHASE III) 1/31/05PCL "S" TR 7996 40 5.886Ac MB 415-4 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES) 9/13/99 MB 432-30 (NORRIS CANYON ESTATES) 8/6/01 S85^34’09"W 8/15/12 392.67 N69 ^ 6 ’ 3 2 " W 347. 2 3 673.45 "H"N22^39’11 "W185 .84 "G" TR 7575 "C "27 256.74 R=770 D "L" "K" B B B 46.8Ac TR 7578 "F-1" "F-2" "F-4" 4.94Ac 81-84 41 0.6 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Miles0.6 Notes Contra Costa County -DOIT GIS Legend This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. 0.280 1:18,056 Printout of Subject Property and Surrounding General Plan Designations City Limits Unincorporated Highways Highways Bay Area General Plan SV (Single Family Residential - Very Low) SL (Single Family Residential - Low) SM (Single Family Residential - Medium) SH (Single Family Residential - High) ML (Multiple Family Residential - Low) MM (Multiple Family Residential - Medium) MH (Multiple Family Residential - High) MV (Multiple Family Residential - Very High) MS (Multiple Family Residential - Very High Special) CC (Congregate Care/Senior Housing) MO (Mobile Home) M-1 (Parker Avenue Mixed Use) M-2 (Downtown/Waterfront Rodeo Mixed Use) M-3 (Pleasant Hill BART Mixed Use) M-4 (Willow Pass Road Mixed Use) M-5 (Willow Pass Road Commercial Mixed Use) M-6 (Bay Point Residential Mixed Use) M-7 (Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station Mixed Use) M-8 (Dougherty Valley Village Center Mixed Use) M-9 (Montalvin Manor Mixed Use) M-10 (Willow Pass Business Park Mixed Use) M-11 (Appian Way Mixed Use) M-12 (Triangle Area Mixed Use) M-13 (San Pablo Dam Road Mixed Use) M-14 (Heritage Mixed Use) CO (Commercial) 0.6 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Miles0.6 Notes Contra Costa County -DOIT GIS Legend This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. 0.280 1:18,056 Printout of Subject Property and Surrounding Zoning Districts City Limits Unincorporated Highways Highways Bay Area Zoning R-6 (Single Family Residential) R-6 -FH (Single Family Residential - Flood Hazard Combining District) R-6, -FH -UE (Single Family Residential - Flood Hazard and Urban Farm Animal Exclusion Combining District) R-6 -SD-1 (Single Family Residential - Slope Density and Hillside Development Combining District) R-6 -TOV -K (Single Family Residential - Tree Obstruction of View Ordinance and Kensington Combining District) R-6, -UE (Single Family Residential - Urban Farm Animal Exclusion Combining District) R-6 -X (Single Family Residential - Railroad Corridor Combining District) R-7 (Single Family Residential) R-7 -X (Single Family Residential - Railroad Corridor Combining District) R-10 (Single Family Residential) R-10, -UE (Single Family Residential - Urban Farm Animal Exclusion Combining District) R-12 (Single Family Residential) R-15 (Single Family Residential) R-20 (Single Family Residential) R-20, -UE (Single Family Residential - Urban Farm Animal Exclusion Combining District) R-40 (Single Family Residential) R-40 -FH (Single Family Residential - Flood Hazard Combining District) R-40, -FH -UE (Single Family Residential - Flood Hazard and Urban Farm Animal Exclusion Combining District) R-40, -UE (Single Family Residential - Urban Farm Animal Exclusion Combining District) R-65 (Single Family Residential) R-100 (Single Family Residential) D-1 (Two Family Residential) 0.6 THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Miles0.6 Notes Contra Costa County -DOIT GIS Legend This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. 0.280 1:18,056 Aerial View of Subject Property and Vicinity City Limits Unincorporated Highways Highways Bay Area County Boundary Bay Area Counties World Imagery Low Resolution 15m Imagery High Resolution 60cm Imagery High Resolution 30cm Imagery Citations 1 CEQA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: Freitas Family Two-Lot Subdivision & Rezone Project County File #MS18-0008 & RZ19-3249 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development 30 Muir Rd. Martinez, CA 94553 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Daniel Barrios, (925) 674-7788 4. Project Location: 2350 Norris Canyon Road, San Ramon APN: 211-210-029 & -075 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: R. Ross Avedian P/A Design Resources, Inc. 3021 Citrus Circle, Suite 150 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 6. General Plan Designation: AL, Agricultural Lands & SL, Single-Family Residential Low Density 7. Zoning: A-4, Agricultural Preserve District 8. Description of Project: The applicant proposes to subdivide a 69.32-acre parcel into two new parcels. These two new parcels are proposed as Parcel A and Parcel B, with 38.38 acres and 30.96 acres of total area, respectively. Additionally, the applicant proposes to rezone the proposed Parcel B from Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) to Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20) The proposed project also includes a variance to allow proposed Parcel A to have a total area of 38.38 acres, where the A-4 district requires a minimum of 40 acres. No development is proposed as a part of this project. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The subject site is an approximately 69.32-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Norris Canyon Road and Ashbourne Drive in the unincorporated San Ramon area. The subject property is located within both the Agricultural Lands (AL) and the Single-Family Residential Low Density (SL) General Plan Land Use designations, as well as the Agricultural Preserve (A-4) Zoning District. The land to the northeast, west and south of the property are established open space and agricultural lands, and the area adjacent to the southeast of the subject property is the Norris Canyon Estates development. The property and its surrounding area slope moderately with many peaks throughout the rolling hills. Within the local area, Interstate 680 is located approximately 1.8 miles east of the property, the County line with Alameda County is located at the northeast corner of the property, and the City of San Ramon is approximately 0.65 miles northeast. 2 Existing Site Condition: The subject 69.32-acre property is bisected by Norris Canyon Road, but it is a single parcel. San Catanio Creek is adjacent to the south of Norris Canyon Road and runs parallel to it. The northern half of the property contains a single-family residence in the northeast corner with associated accessory structures and improvements, while the southern half is vacant. The property slopes moderately, with overall elevation changes upwards of 300 feet from its lowest to highest points. There is a large number of trees on both sides of the road in the northern, central and southeastern areas, and it is presently accessed by a driveway from Norris Canyon Road at the intersection with Ashbourne Drive. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing, approval, or participation agreement:  Contra Costa County Building Inspection Division  Contra Costa County Public Works Department  Contra Costa County Environmental Health Division  San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District 11. Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If so, is there a plan for consultation that includes, for example, the determination of significance of impacts to tribal cultural resources, procedures regarding confidentiality, etc.? A letter was sent to Wilton Rancheria staff on May 29, 2019 as a notice of opportunity to request consultation for the proposed project, but no response was received. However, staff has included mitigation measures to ensure the proposed project will have no significant impacts to tribal cultural resources. 3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Energy Geology/Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic Tribal Cultural Resources Utilities/Services Systems Wildfire Mandatory Findings of Significance Environmental Determination On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. _____________________________ ____________________ Daniel Barrios Date Planner II Contra Costa County Department of Conservation & Development 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Environmental Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact 1. AESTHETICS – Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic building within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? SUMMARY: a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Less than significant with mitigation) Figure 9-1 (Scenic Ridges & Waterways) of the General Plan Open Space Element identifies the specific resources of Contra Costa County as designated scenic ridges and waterways. The intent of these scenic resource designations is to preserve and protect areas of identified high scenic value, where practical, and in accordance with the Land Use Element. The subject property is located at the corner of Norris Canyon Road and Ashbourne Drive in the unincorporated San Ramon area. This property is located adjacent to the Norris Canyon scenic ridge, as outlined in the Contra Costa County 2005-2020 General Plan. Figure 5-4 designates Norris Canyon Road as a scenic route. As such, this property is located within the vicinity of a designated scenic ridgeway to the south and the scenic route of Norris Canyon Road , as designated in the Contra Costa County 2005-2020 General Plan. The proposed project does not include the construction of any new buildings or structures and will not negatively affect the scenic qualities of the scenic ridge or any scenic vistas from Highway 4 . The existing residence located in the northeast corner of the subject property is located at the lowest elevation of the subject property, so this residence would not affect the scenic ridgeline to the south . Overall, no development is proposed as a part of this project that could affect the scenic qualities of the adjacent scenic ridgeline. However, the potential for future development on the proposed Parcel B could detract from scenic qualities of the surrounding area and pose a potentially significant impact. As such, the applicant is required to implement the following mitigation measure to reduce the potential for negative impacts on a scenic vista. Implementation of t he mitigation 5 measure below would reduce the potential environmental impacts associated with the establishment of the proposed facility to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measures Aesthetics-1 (AES-1): Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the project sponsor shall identify a building envelope on Parcel B, subject to the review and approval of C DD. This building envelope shall be limited to two acres in total area and shall be located in such a way as to minimize visual impacts as viewed from Norris Canyon Road. Aesthetics-2 (AES-2): Prior to the submittal of building permits on Parcel B, the project sponsor shall submit the proposed plans for the review and approval of CDD. In addition to architectural plans for the development, the plans shall include screening elements to minimize visual impacts from neighboring properties and visual impacts as viewed from Norris Canyon Road. b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic building within a state scenic highway? (Less than significant with mitigation) Figure 5-4 (Scenic Routes Map) of the General Plan Transportation and Circulation Element identifies certain roads and highways as General Plan-designated scenic routes. The subject property is located at the corner of Norris Canyon Road and Ashbourne Drive in the unincorporated San Ramon area. The property slopes moderately, with overall elevation changes upwards of 300 feet from its lowest to highest points, and there is a large number of trees on both sides of the road in the northern, central and southeastern areas. As detailed in section 1.a above, the subject property is located within the vicinity of a designated scenic ridgeway to the south and the scenic route of Norris Canyon Road, as designated in the Contra Costa County 2005-2020 General Plan. As such, the applicant is required to implement mitigation measure AES-1 to reduce the potential for negative impacts on a scenic vista. Implementation of t his mitigation measure would reduce the potential environmental impacts associated with the establishment of the proposed facility to a less than significant level. c) Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Less than significant with mitigation) The 69.32-acre subject property contains a single-family residence in the northeast corner of the lot, but is otherwise undeveloped. The property is surrounded by agricultural land, open space, and single-family residential development, and the surrounding terrain is characterized by moderately steep, rolling hills. There is no development proposed as a part of this project. However, mitigation measures AES-1 and AES-2 require the project sponsor to establish a building envelope on Parcel B and install screening elements on all sides of the pr operty to reduce the potential for visual impacts stemming from the proposed project. Therefore, the 6 potential for the project to substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site is less than significant. d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (Less than significant) There is no development proposed as a part of this project. However, Parcel B has the potential for future development of one single-family residence with associated accessory structures and agricultural buildings. After the construction of such buildings, their finishes may introduce more light and glare in the area which may minimally change the existing character of the area. Daytime views would be similar to views of other single-family residential developments along Norris Canyon Road, which maintain a single-family residential and agricultural nature to their development. Lighting of the home, including potential exterior house lights and vehicle and pedestrian circulation lights, may affect nighttime views; however, the lighting would be similar to that of existing residences in the surrounding area and generally located around the building, thus creating a minimal, if any, impact on the surrounding area. Accordingly, the impact on day or nighttime views would be less than significant. 2. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effec ts, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? 7 e) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use? SUMMARY: a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or F armland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? (No impact) As shown on the California Department of Conservatio n’s Contra Costa County Important Farmland 2014 map, the project site does not contain farmland designated “Prime”, “Unique”, or of “Statewide Importance”. Approval of the project would therefore not result in any impacts related to the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide importance to a non-agricultural use. b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Less than significant) The project site is within the Agricultural Preserve (A-4) Zoning District with both the Agricultural Lands (AL) and the Single-Family Residential Low Density (SL) General Plan land use designations. The 38.38-acre northern portion of the site, proposed as Parcel A, is under a Williamson Act contract, but the southern 30.96-acre portion, proposed as Parcel B, is not under contract. The northern portion is under Williamson Act contract #16-70. As this portion of the site is already under Williamson Act contract and is not being rezoned, the project would have no effect or conflict with the existing zoning or Williamson Act contract. c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g), timberland (as de fined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g) or conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? (Less than significant) The project site contains areas of forest land as defined by California Public Resources Code Section 12220 (g), which defines forest land as “land that can support 10-percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, inclu ding timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits.” The proposed project involves the subdivision of the subject 69.32-acre property into two parcels and the rezoning of the southern 30.96-acre Parcel B from A-4 to A-20, with no development included as part of the 8 project. As both the existing and proposed zoning districts are exclusively for agricultural and associated single-family residential uses, the forest land contained on the subject property would not be negatively impacted by the proposed project. Approval of the project would not result in the conversion or loss of forest resources. d) Would the project involve or result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non - forest use? (Less than significant) The project site contains areas of forest land as defined by California Public Resources Code Section 12220 (g), which defines forest land as “land that can support 10-percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits.” The proposed project involves the subdivision of the subject 69.32-acre property into two parcels and the rezoning of the southern 30.96-acre Parcel B from A-4 to A-20, with no development included as part of the project. As both the existing and proposed zoning districts are exclusively for agricultural and associated single-family residential uses, the forest land contained on the subject property would not be negatively impacted by the proposed project. Approval of the project would not result in the conversion or loss of forest resources. e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Less than significant) The proposed project involves the subdivision of the subject 69.32-acre property into two parcels and the rezoning of the southern 30.96-acre Parcel B from A-4 to A-20, with no development included as part of the project. As both the existing and proposed zoning districts are exclusively for agricultural and associated single-family residential uses, the project would not contribute to the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use. 3. AIR QUALITY – Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? d) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? 9 SUMMARY: a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Less than significant) Contra Costa County is within the San Francisco Bay air basin, which is regulated by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) pursuant to the Bay Area 2017 Clean Air Plan. The Clean Air Plan defines a control strateg y that BAAQMD and its partners will implement to: (1) reduce emissions and decrease ambient concentrations of harmful pollutants; (2) safeguard public health by reducing exposure to air pollutants that pose the greatest health risk, with an emphasis on protecting the communities most heavily impacted by air pollution; and (3) reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to protect the climate. The purpose of the Clean Air Plan is to bring the air basin into compliance with the requirements of Federal and State air quality standards. In 2017, the BAAQMD prepared Air Quality Guidelines to assist lead agencies in evaluating air quality impacts of projects and plans proposed within the San Francisco Bay air basin. To fulfill State ozone planning requirements, the 2017 control strategy includes all feasible measures to reduce emissions of ozone precursors, including ozone, reactive organic gases, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and fine particulate matter, while also reducing the transport of ozone and its precursors to neighboring basins. The 2017 Air Quality Guidelines include operational, construction-related, and greenhouse gas emissions screening criteria. If the project does not exceed the screening criteria, the project would not result in the ge neration of criteria air pollutants that exceed the thresholds of significance for the criteria air pollutants. The proposed project consists of rezoning and subdividing the subject property into two new parcels, with no development proposed at this time . Currently, there is one residence located in the northeastern portion of the subject property, and after the proposed subdivision there would be the potential for the development of a residence on the proposed Parcel B for a total of two. Two single-family residences would not exceed either the operational screening criteria of 325 dwelling units or the construction-related screening criteria of 114 dwelling units as established in the 2017 Air Quality G uidelines. Furthermore, this proposed subdivision would be located within an established residential and agricultural area where properties are large, and neighboring residences are significant distances from each other. Also, as explained further in subsequent sections, the proposed project will comply with air quality standards set forth by BAAQMD and the 2017 Clean Air Plan. Therefore, would not be in conflict with the 2017 Clean Air Plan or obstruct its implementation. b) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criter ia pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (Less than significant) 10 As discussed above, the proposed project would not result in significant emissions of criteria air pollutants during the construction period or during project operation (i.e., occupancy of the single - family residences). The potential to develop two single-family residences would not exceed either the operational screening criteria of 325 dwelling units or the construction-related screening criteria of 114 dwelling units as established in the 2017 Air Quality Guidelines. Furthermore, this proposed subdivision would be located within an established residential and agricultural area where properties are large, and neighboring residences are significant distances from each other. Although the proposed project would contribute small increments to the level of criteria air pollutants in the atmosphere, the project would have a less than significant adverse environmental impact on the level of any criteria pollutant. c) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Less than significant) Occupancy of the two potential residences would not be expected to cause any localized emissions that could expose sensitive receptors (e.g., residences, schools) to unhealthy long - term air pollutant levels. Two single-family residences would not exceed either the operational screening criteria of 325 dwelling units or the construction-related screening criteria of 114 dwelling units as established in the 2017 Air Quality Guidelines. Furthermore, this proposed subdivision would be located within an established residential and agricultural area where properties are large, and neighboring residences are significant distances from each other. Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact on sensitive receptors. d) Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Less than significant) The proposed single-family residences would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. As there is no development proposed as a part of this project, there would be no additional impacts generated by this project. Furthermore, the establishment of single-family residential development is not a use normally associated with the generation of objectionable odors. Therefore, the project would have a less-than-significant impact in terms of odors. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? 11 b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? SUMMARY: a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Less than significant with mitigation) The subject property is currently vacant. Pursuant to Figure 8-1 (Significant Ecological Area and Selected Locations of Protected Wildlife and Plans Species Areas) of the County General Plan, the subject property is not identified as a Significant Ecological Resource area. However, in correspondence received from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife on August 17, 2018, the riparian area created by San Catanio Creek is suitable habitat for the Alameda Whipsnake, a State-designated protected species. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. As there is suitable habitat for the Alameda Whipsnake and an abundance of trees and grassland areas, there is a potential for future development to have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional pla ns, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. However, implementation of the following mitigation measures would reduce this potential impact to a less than significant level. 12 Mitigation Measures Biology 1 (BIO-1): Prior to the submittal of building permits or any ground disturbance activities, the project sponsor shall employ a biologist familiar with State- and Federally-protected wildlife and plant species native to the Contra Costa County area shall conduct a preconstruction survey to assess the site’s biological resources. This study shall identify all protected wildlife and plant species and provide mitigation measures to preserve these resources. These mitigation measures shall be implemented by the project sponsor and be monitored by the consulting biologist throughout construction of the project. Biology 2 (BIO-2): The following general avoidance and minimization measures shall be implemented throughout the construction activities to avoid potential impacts to sensitive biological resources. 1. All staging, maintenance, and storage of construction equipment will be performed in a manner to preclude any direct or indirect discharge of fuel, oil, or other petroleum products into waters of the U.S./State. No other debris, rubbish, creosote-treated wood, soil, silt, sand, cement, concrete or washings thereof, or other construction-related materials or wastes will be allowed to enter into or be placed where they may be washed by rainfall or runoff into waters of the U.S./State. All such debris and waste shall be picked-up daily and properly disposed of at an appropriate site. 2. All food-related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps will be disposed of in closed containers and removed at least once a day from the project site. 3. No firearms will be allowed on the project site except for those carried by authorized security personnel, or local, State, or Federal law enforcement officials. 4. Project personnel shall not have dogs or cats in the project area. 5. Project personnel will not be permitted to smoke in the project area. 6. No pesticides of any kind will be used on the project site at any time during project implementation. 7. No equipment will be operated in areas of flowing or standing water. No fueling, cleaning, or maintenance of vehicles or equipment will take place within any areas where an accidental discharge to waters of the U.S./State waters may occur. 8. All equipment including excavators, trucks, hand tools, etc., that may have come in contact with invasive plants or seeds of these plants, shall be carefully cleaned before arriving onsite and shall be carefully cleaned before removal from the site to prevent spread of these plants. 13 9. Disturbance or removal of vegetation will not exceed the minimum necessary to complete construction. 10. To minimize harassment, injury, death, and harm in the form of temporary habitat disturbances, all project-related vehicle traffic will be restricted to established roads, construction areas, equipment staging, parking, and stockpile areas. 11. Along the length of the onsite portion of San Catanio Creek, the work area will be delineated with orange silt fencing in order to minimize impacts to habitat beyond the work limit. This fencing will remain in place until all ground moving operations have ceased. Orange cyclone fencing, or other materials that can entrap small amphibians and reptiles and other small wildlife species, will not be used. 12. For each onsite tree proposed for preservation, a root protection zone will be established, extending from the trunk to the dripline (the outer extent of the tree canopy). This root protection zone will be fenced off from the work area with construction fencing in order to protect the preserved trees from inadvertent damage due to ground moving, compaction, and/or limb removal within the footprint of the dripline. b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Less than significant) The proposed project will remain outside of the onsite portion of San Catanio Creek and its associated riparian canopy. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. Additionally, the project sponsor is required by Mitigation Measure AES-1 to establish a building envelope on Parcel B. This building envelope will be reviewed by staff to ensure that it does not directly impact the riparian area of San Catanio Creek. Additionally, it is anticipated that project authorization in the form of an incidental take permit would be required from CDFW for any development in the vicinity of San Catanio Creek . Overall, the project would have a less than significant impact on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community. c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (No impact) The U.S. Army Corp of Engineers (Corps) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are two of the primary Federal agencies which enforce the Clean Water Act and administer the associated permitting program. As such, these agencies define wetland as areas that are 14 inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. The subject property would not be categorized as a wetland as defined above. Therefore, there is no potential for the proposed project having an adverse effect on a federally protected wetland. d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites? (Less than significant) As discussed above, the proposed project could result in potentially significant impacts to special- status species without the implementation of mitigation measures. Accordingly, mitigation measures BIO-1 and BIO-2 have been included to mitigate the impacts to a level considered les s than significant. e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (Less than significant) The Contra Costa County Tree Protection and Preservation Ordina nce provides for the protection of certain trees by regulating tree removal and development within their drip lines while allowing for reasonable development of private property. On any property proposed for development approval, the Ordinance requires tree alteration or removal to be considered as part of the project application. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. If development on Parcel B encroaches within the drip line or proposes to remove a code-protected tree, the development would be required to obtain a separate tree permit, and approval of the proposed project would include conditions of ap proval for the restitution of any tree approved to be removed, protection of remaining trees where work may occur within the drip lines of the trees, and all of the tree protection measures from the project’s arborist report. Additionally, pursuant to Section 914-14.012 and 914-14.014 of the County Ordinance the development would be required to meet a minimum setback distance away from San Catanio Creek so as to protect the biological resources contained within the creek. As a result of CDD staff applying the Tree Protection and Preservation Ordinance and creek structure setback requirements to a potential proposed project, there would be no significant conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (No impact) There is one adopted habitat conservation plan in Contra Costa County, t he East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan / Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCCP), which 15 was approved in May 2007 by the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy, comprised of the cities of Brentwood, Clayton, Oakley, and Pitt sburg, and Contra Costa County. The HCP/NCCP establishes a coordinated process for permitting and mitigating the incidental take of endangered species in East Contra Costa County. The unincorporated San Ramon area where this project is located is outside of the covered area for the HCP/NCCP, and therefore, the proposed project would not affect the HCP/NCCP. 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? SUMMARY: a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15064.5? (No impact) The California Public Resources code defines a historical resource as a resource that has been listed or is eligible for listing on the California Historical Register of Historical Resources, a resource included in a local register of historical resources, or identified as significant in a historical survey meeting the requirements of the Public Resources Code. As there are no buildings or structures on-site listed on Contra Costa County’s Historic Resources Inventory, on California’s Register of Historical Resources, or the National Register of Historic places, nor any building or structure that qualifies to be listed, the project site would not be considered a historical resource, and there would be no potential impact for the proposed project resulting in an adverse change of a historical resource. b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeo logical resource pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15064.5? (Less than significant with mitigation) According to the Archaeological Sensitivity map (Figure 9-2) of the County General Plan, the subject site is described as a “highly sensitive area.” Based on this description, it is possible that construction of the project can unearth new archaeological finds. The proposed project was also distributed to Wilton Rancheria of the Department of Environmental Resources . Therefore, the following mitigation measure will provide excavation crews with information needed to identify any potential undiscovered resources and reduce the potential impact to any find to less than significant levels. (CUL-1, CUL-2, CUL-3). 16 Mitigation Measures Cultural Resources 1 (CUL-1): If deposits of prehistoric or historical archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbance activities, all work within 30 yards of these materials shall be stopped until a professional archaeologist who is certified by the Society for California Archaeology (SCA) and/or the Society of Professional Archaeology (SOPA), and the Native American tribe that has requested consultation and/or demonstrated interest in the project site, have had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation(s) if deemed necessary. Cultural Resources 2 (CUL-2): If the deposits are not eligible, avoidance is not necessary. If the deposits are eligible, they will need to be avoided by imp acts or such impacts must be mitigated. Upon completion of the archaeological assessment, a report should be prepared documenting the methods, results, and recommendations. The report should be submitted to the Northwest Information Center and appropriate Contra Costa County agencies. Prehistoric materials can include flake-stone tools (e.g., projectile points, knives, choppers) or obsidian, chert, or quartzite tool-making debris; culturally darkened soil (i.e., midden soil often containing heat-affected rock, ash and charcoal, shellfish remains, and cultural materials); and stone milling equipment (e.g., mortars, pestles, handstones). Historical materials can include wood, stone, concrete, or adobe footings, walls and other structural remains; debris -filled wells or privies; and deposits of wood, glass ceramics, and other refuse. Cultural Resources 3 (CUL-3): If human remains are encountered, work within 50 feet of the discovery should be redirected and the County Coroner notified immediately. At the same time, an archaeologist should be contacted to assess the situation. If the human remains are of a Native American origin, the Coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours of this identification. The Native American Heritage Commission will identify a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) to inspect the property and provide recommendations for the proper treatment of the remains and associated grave goods. Upon completion of the assessment, the archaeologist should prepare a report documenting the methods and results, and provide recommendations for the treatment of the human remains and any associated cultural materials, as appropriate and in coordination with the recommendations of the MLD. The report should be submitted to the Northwest Information Center and appropriate Contra Costa agencies. c) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Less than significant with mitigation) There is a possibility that human remains could be present and accidental discovery could occur. Standard CDD practice is to require that work shall stop if human remains are uncovered during 17 grading, trenching, or other onsite earthwork until the County Coroner has had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the human remains and determine the proper treatment and disposition of the human remains. If the Coroner determines the remains may those of a Native American, the Coroner will contact the Native American Heritage Commission. Nevertheless, the included mitigation measures (CUL-1, CUL-2 and CUL-3) will address any unexpected discovery or find which may occur during the construction phase of the project. 6. ENERGY – Would the project: a) Result in potentially significant environmental im pact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? SUMMARY: a) Would the project result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? (Less than significant) The proposed project would not have a significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during proj ect construction or operation. Currently, no development is proposed as a result of the proposed subdivision. However, if development is proposed in the future, the project sponsor would be required to comply with conditions of approval regarding construction activity restrictions that outline best management practices to ensure that construction activities are conducted in the most efficient and least impactful way possible (e.g. limiting idling time for vehicles and equipment). b) Would the project conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? (Less than significant) Although no development is proposed as a result of the proposed subdivision, t he proposed project will be required to meet all energy efficiency standards outlined in the most recent California Building Code when designing amy proposed buildings and submitting for building permits. Meeting or exceeding these energy efficiency requirements would ensure that the project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. 7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: 18 i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? SUMMARY: a) Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist -Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (Less than significant) The California Geological Survey (CGS) has delineated Alquist-Priolo (A-P) zones along the known active faults in California. The nearest fault considered active by CGS is the Calaveras fault, which is mapped approximately 1.5 miles northeast of the project site. Because the site is not within the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, the risk of fault rupture is generally regarded as very low. As a result, the potential impact from surface fault rupture would be less than significant. 19 ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (Less than significant) Figure 10-4 (Estimated Seismic Ground Response) of the General Plan Safety Element identifies the project site to be in an area rated “moderately low” damage susceptibility. The risk of structural damage from ground shaking is regulated by the building code and the County Grading Ordinance. The building code requires use of seismic parameters which allow the structural engineer to design buildings to be based on soil profile types and proximity of faults deemed capable of generating strong/violent earthquak e shaking. Quality construction, conservative design and compliance with building and grading regulations can be expected to keep risks within generally accepted limits. For these reasons, the environmental impact from seismic ground shaking would be considered to be less than significant. iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? (Less than significant with mitigation) Figure 10-5 (Estimated Liquefaction Potential) of the General Plan Safety Element divides land in the County into three liquefaction potential categories: “generally high,” “generally moderate to low,” and “generally low”. It is used as a “screening criteria” during the processing of land development applications, on a project-by-project basis. By intent, the map is conservative on the side of safety. The project site is in an area of generally low liquefaction potential on the Liquefaction Potential Map, and risks are considered relatively low; however, the County Peer Review Geologist, Darwin Myers Associates (DMA), cautions that hazard maps included in the Safety Element of the General Plan are not a substitute for a site -specific geotechnical investigation. In September 2000, Berlogar Geotechnical Consultants (BGC) completed a feasibility geologic investigation of the project site. For this investigation BGC logged 2 borings and 22 test pits on the Freitas property. The investigation confirmed the presence of undocumented fill on the proposed parcel located south of San Catanio Creek, and BGC mapped the approximate distribution of fill. Near the channel, in the narrow valley bottom area, BGC encountered stream channel and overbank deposits. The BGC report characterizes these deposits as predominantly sandy clays and clayey sand are described as medium stiff to stiff. The preliminary opinion of the project geotechnical engineer is that these surficial deposits are relatively thin in most areas, and that liquefaction does not present a significant development constraint. DMA reviewed the two BGC investigations, and notes that a primary product of the BGC investigation is an original geologic map of the site indicating that essentially all of the proposed parcel south of San Catanio Creek is underlain by bedrock at shallow depths. This evidence suggests that there are feasib le building sites underlain by non-liquefiable bedrock. However, the driveway/ roadway that would serve as access a building site(s) may traversing lands adjacent to the creek corridor posing an unknown (but potentially significant) risk of liquefiable sands. The 2003 BGC report evaluated the proposed parcel that is north of the San Catanio Creek corridor. Within this area the focus of the investigation was evaluation of a large, deep -seated 20 landslide. This upland area does not present a risk of liquefiab le soils. DMA reviewed the reports for BGC and concluded that risks associated with liquefaction would be less than significant for the northern proposed parcel. However, for the southern parcel, DMA concluded there would be a potentially significant impact due to liquefaction. Consequently the applicant is required to implement mitigation measure Geology 1 (GEO-1) in Section a) (iv). Implementation of Mitigation Measure Geology 1 would reduce the impact from liquefaction to a less than significant level. iv) Landslides? (Less than significant with mitigation) In 1975 the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) issued photointerpretive maps of Contra Costa County showing the distribution landslide and other surficial deposits. The USGS landslide mapping is presented on Figure 10-6 of the General Plan Safety Element. This map, which was prepared by an experienced USGS geologist, indicates that there is geomorphic evidence of landslide deposits on or both of the proposed parcels. In its 2000 investigation, BGC found that the terrain features that were interpreted as landslides by the USGS on the southern proposed parcel was instead due to differential weathering and erosion of the steeply dipping bedrock of Miocene age. The assessment of BGC was based chiefly on the results of exploratory test pits which were broadly distributed across the southern parcel. In 2003 BGC performed a geotechnical investigation of the parcel north of San Catanio Creek. That investigation included the logging of three borings. Most of the ground surface slopes to the south at 20% (toward the creek). Based on reconnaissance data, a large landslide (600 ft. wide by 900 ft. long) was confirmed on the northeast portion of the site. BGC advanced two rock cores through the landslide debris. Based on the subsurface data, laboratory tests and engineering analysis, BGC concluded the there was a potential building site in the northeast portion of the northern parcel, and BGC provided recommendations for remediation of the landslide area. In summary, the two BGC investigations focused on potential geologic risks associated with future development of a single-family residence(s) within their study area, which included both of the proposed parcels that are the subject of MS18-0008. They conclusions and recommendations of BGC are intended to provide general recommendations to guide the owner/ future developer. Further geotechnical analysis would be required prior to the construction of a single -family residence on the proposed parcels. Upon review of the two BGC investigations, DMA concluded that there would be a potentially significant impact due to landslides. Consequently, the applicant is required to implement the following mitigation measures, Geology 1, Geology 2 and Geology 3. 21 Mitigation Measures Geology 1 (GEO-1): At least 60 days prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit a geology, soil, and foundation report that meets the requirements of Subdivision Ordinance Section 94-4.420 for review by the County Peer Review Geologist, and review and approval by the CDD. Improvement, grading, and building plans shall carry out the recommendations of the approved report. This report shall include evaluation of: (i) based on adequate subsurface e xploration, laboratory testing and engineering analysis, the required investigation shall include evaluation of potential hazards and provide appropriate recommendations to mitigate any significant hazards that are confirmed to be present (i.e. landslide, liquefaction, slope creep, expansive and corrosive soils). Detailed design recommendations shall be provided, including (ii) clearing and grading (iii) residential driveway design, (iii) residential foundation design, (iv) drainage, (v) C.3 basin design/ c onstruction, (vi) undergrounding of utilities (particularly within landslide areas), and (vii) operative California Building Code seismic design parameters. Geology 2 (GEO-2): During site grading, drainage and foundation-related work, the project geotechnical engineer shall provide observation and testing services to ensure that the construction is in compliance with recommendations in the approved geotechnical report. The project geotechnical engineer shall provide recommendations for any modification t o approved plans that are deemed necessary based on the actual field conditions encountered during grading. Written approval from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Division shall be obtained prior to any modification. Documentation of the observ ation and testing services, as well as other project details shall be presented in a final geotechnical report, to be submitted to the County and kept on file. Geology 3 (GEO-3): Prior to recording the Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit a deed disclosure related to the potential ground failure hazards (liquefaction and landslide), and shall include complete bibliographic citation to the 2000 and 2003 Geologic Feasibility Investigations of Berlogar Geotechnical Consultants, indicate where a copy of these reports can be accessed. Submit a draft of the proposed language to be used in the Deed Disclosure for review and approval by CDD. This review shall be for the purpose that the language used adequately characterizes the hazard posed by ground failure and adverse soils conditions. Following approval of the language, that applicant shall record the deed disclosure and shall provide a copy of the recorded deed disclosure to the CDD. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce the impact from ground failure (liquefaction and landslides) to a less than significant level. 22 b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (Less than significant with mitigation) According to the Soil Survey of Contra Costa County, the soil series mapped in the project vicinity is Los Gatos loam (LhF, 30-50% slopes). This soil series consists of well-drained soils underlain by soft interbedded shale and sandstone. The typical profile for this soil is 32 inches deep. The erosion potential is rated moderate to high where the soil is tilled and exposed. During the grading and construction period for the future single-family residence, rural driveway and C.3 basins, areas of construction activity would have exposed Los Gatos loam, resulting in a potentially significant impact due to soil erosion. Consequently, the applicant is required to implement the following mitigation measure, Geology 4 (GEO-4). Mitigation Measure Geology 4: At the time of application for a building or grading permit, whichever occurs first, a construction period erosion and sedimentation control plan that is in compliance with applicable construction period requirements of the State Water Resources Control Board and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board shall be included in the submitted construction drawings, and implemented during construction. Implementation of this mitigation measure would reduce the impact of soil erosion during construction to a less than significant level. c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (Less than significant with mitigation) As discussed in Section 6.a.iii and 6.a.iv above, the risk of ground failure is considered to be a potentially significant impact. Consequently, the applicant is required to implement mitigation measures Geology 1, 2, and 3 above. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce the impact from ground failure to a less than significant level. d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (Less than significant with mitigation) With regard to its engineering properties, the Los Gatos loam is considered to be moderately expansive and moderately corrosive. Expansive soils expand when water is added and shrink when they dry out. This continuous change in soils volume causes structures to move unevenly and crack. Corrosive soils tend to damage concrete and/or uncoated steel that is in contact with the ground. Thus, there is a potentially significant impact due to expansiv e soil. Consequently, the applicant is required to implement Consequently, the applicant is required to implement 23 mitigation measures Geology 1 and 2 above. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce the impact of expansive and corrosive soils to a less than significant level. e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? (Less than significant) The future single-family residences on Parcel A and B would have a on-site septic system. The septic system would be reviewed and permitted by the Contra Costa County Health Services Department, Environmental Health Division. The Environmental Health Divis ion would review and inspect design plans for the septic system to prevent contamination of nearby surface and groundwater. f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (Less than significant with mitigation) With respect to paleontological and geologic resources, there is a possibility that buried archaeological resources could be present and accidental discovery could occur. Standard CDD practice is to require that work shall stop if such materials are uncovered during grading, trenching, or other onsite earthwork until a certified archaeologist has had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation as deemed necessary. Nevertheless, the included mitigation measures (CUL-1, CUL-2 and CUL-3) will address any unexpected discovery or find which may occur during the construction phase of the project. 8. Greenhouse Gas Emissions – Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? SUMMARY: a) Would the project generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? (Less than significant) Greenhouse gases are gases that trap heat in the atmosphere and contribute to global climate change. Greenhouse gases include gases such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and various fluorocarbons commonly found in aerosol sp rays. Typically, a single residential or commercial construction project in the County would not generate enough greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to substantially change the global average temperature; however, the 24 accumulation of GHG emissions from all projects both within the County and outside the County has contributed and will contribute to global climate change. The subdivision of the subject property into two new parcels with the potential for a net increase of one new single-family residences has the potential to generate some GHG emissions; however, the amount generated would not result in a significant adverse environmental impact. This determination has been made using the screening criteria provided in the 2017 BAAQMD Air Quality Guidelines as a guide, which specifies 56 dwelling units as the operational greenhouse gas screening size; the BAAQMD does not have any standards for construction-related greenhouse gases. If the project does not exceed the screening criteria, the project would not result in the generation of GHG emissions that exceed the thresholds of significance, as identified in the 2017 BAAQMD Guidelines which were used as a guide in determining GHG impacts. b) Would the project conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? (Less than significant) In December 2015, the County Board of Supervisors adopted the Contra Costa County Climate Action Plan. This Climate Action Plan (CAP) demonstrates Contra Costa County’s (County) commitment to addressing the challenges of climate change by reducing local GHG emissions while improving community health. Additionally, this CAP meets the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements for developing a qualified GHG reduction strategy, and is consistent with the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD) guidance on preparing a qualified GHG reduction strategy. The strategies include measures such as implementing standards for green buildings and energy-efficient buildings, reducing vehicle and transit-related emissions, and reducing waste disposal. The proposed project, including a two-lot subdivision, has the potential to generate some GHG emissions, but not at levels that would result in a conflict with any policy, plan, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Other than energy-efficient buildings, the Contra Costa County CAP does not include goals, policies or implementation strategies for single-family residential development. Therefore, the project will not conflict with the Contra Costa County Climate Action Plan and will have a less than significant impact related to reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS – Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? 25 c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? SUMMARY: a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Less than significant) The proposed project does not include the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Over the long term, it can be anticipated that the use of chemicals by future owners of a potential new residence on Parcel B would be typical of residences (e.g. cleaning and gardening products), and there is already an existing residence on Parcel A. Accordingly, the risks of creating a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials are considered to be less than significant. b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Less than significant) As described above, the proposed project does not include the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. Over the long term, it can be anticipated that the use of che micals by future owners of a potential new residence on Parcel B would be typical of residences (e.g. cleaning and gardening products). Additionally, a review of regulatory databases maintained by County, State, and federal agencies found no documentation of hazardous materials violations or discharge on the subject property. Pursuant to the Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List 26 (Cortese List) maintained by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the subject property is not identified as a hazardous materials site. Accordingly, the impact of a release of hazardous materials on the site would be less than significant. c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Less than significant) There are no existing or proposed schools within one -quarter mile of the proposed project. The closest school is Twin Creeks Elementary, which is located approximately 1.1 miles northeast of the subject property. Additionally, there is no development proposed as a part of this project. Therefore, impacts on the school due to hazardous substances at the project site would be less than significant. d) Would the project be located on a site which is included on a lis t of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. (No impact) A review of regulatory databases maintained by County, State, and fede ral agencies found no documentation of hazardous materials violations or discharge on the subject property. Pursuant to the Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List (Cortese List) maintained by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the subject property is not identified as a hazardous materials site. Therefore, there would be no impact from the project. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (No impact) The subject property is not located within the coverage area of the Contra Costa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, as shown in Figure 5-5 of the County General Plan. The nearest public airport is the Buchanan Field Airport located approximately 16 miles north from the subject property. As a result, the proposed project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns that would result in a substantial safety risk. As a result, the proposed project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns that would result in a substantial safety risk. f) Does the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Less than significant) The proposed project includes the subdivision of the subject property into two new lots, but no development is currently proposed with this subdivision. The subject property is located on Norris Canyon Road, which is a major road in the San Ramon area. Norris Canyon Road also connects to two other major roads in the nearby area, including Bollinger Canyon Road and San Ramon 27 Valley Boulevard, all three of which connect to Interstate 680. These roads and I-680 would be used in the event of an emergency requiring evacuation of the local area. The location of the project would not cause it to significantly impair or interfere with emergency evacuation. In addition, the project was sent to the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (SRVFPD) for comments. The SRVFPD submitted comments on the project application detailing requirements for emergency access, water supply, weed abatement, and SRVFPD review of building permit submittals, amongst other items. If development is proposed in the future, the project plans would need to be reviewed and approved by the SRVFPD. Accordingly, the project would have a less than significant impact on any adopted emergency response plans or emergency evacuation plans. g) Does the project Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (Less than significant) The subject property is located within the jurisdiction of the SRVFPD. The SRVFPD submitted comments on the project application detailing requirements for emergency access, water supply, weed abatement, and SRVFPD review of building permit submittals, amongst other items. If development is proposed in the future, the construction drawings would have to be reviewed and approved by the SRVFPD, ensuring that the new development, residents, and the surrounding area are safe from wildfires. In addition, construction on the site would conform to California Building Code Chapter 7A (Materials and Construction Methods for Exterior Wildfire Exposure), California Fire Code Chapter 47 (Requirements for Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Areas), and Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (California Building Standards). As a result, the fire-related risks of the proposed project would be less than significant. 10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY – Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off- site? 28 iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? SUMMARY: a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality? (Less than significant) The installation of new impervious surface, grading and excavation proposed in this project is regulated pursuant to the National Pollution Discharge Elim ination System (NPDES) program. The State Water Resources Control Board has adopted a statewide General Permit that applies to most storm water discharges associated with construction activity. Pursuant to the General Permit, if the proposed construction activity would disturb more than one acre of land, an applicant would be required to develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that includes Best Management Practices (BMPs) designed to reduce potential impacts to surface water quality through both construction and the life of the project. In addition, the proposed project must comply with applicable Contra Costa County C.3 requirements. Contra Costa County, the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and 16 incorporated cities in the county have formed the Co ntra Costa Clean Water Program. In October 2009, Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Francisco Bay Region (RWQCB) adopted the NPDES Municipal Regional Permit for the Program, which regulates discharges from municipal storm drains. Provision C.3 of the Municipal Regional Permit places requirements on site design to minimize creation of impervious surfaces and control storm water runoff. The County has the authority to enforce compliance with its Municipal Regional Permit authority in its adopted C.3 requirements. The C.3 requirements stipulate that projects creating and/or redeveloping at least 10,000 square feet (5,000 square feet for projects that include parking lots, restaurants, automotive service facilities and gas stations) of impervious surface shall treat storm water runoff with permanent storm water management facilities, along with measures to control runoff rates and volumes. 29 Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. PWD has stated that review of a final SWCP is required prior to construction of improvements. Implementation of the PWD-approved SWCP would ensure that impact on water quality from project operation would be less than significant. b) Would the project substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? (Less than significant) Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. PWD has stated that review of a final SWCP is required prior to construction of improvements. Implementation of the PWD-approved SWCP would ensure that impact on groundwater supplies and recharge would be less than significant. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would: i) Result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? (Less than significant) The proposed project would not substantially alter the drainage pattern of the site or area or result in substantial erosion or siltation. Division 914 of the County Ordinance Code requires that all storm water entering and/or originating on this property to be collected and conveyed, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage system, to an adequate natural watercourse having a definable bed and banks or to an existing adequate public storm drainage system which conveys the storm water to an adequate natural watercourse. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. PWD has stated that review of a final SWCP is required prior to construction of improvements. Implementation of the PWD-approved SWCP would ensure that erosion or on- or off-site siltation impacts from project operation would be less than significant. ii) Substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? (Less than significant) The proposed project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. PWD has 30 stated that review of a final SWCP is required prior to construction of improvements. Implementation of the PWD-approved SWCP would ensure that impacts related to surface runoff from project operation would be less than significant. Conformance of the proposed project with this PWD requirement would result in a less than significant impact. iii) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (Less than significant) The proposed project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. PWD has stated that review of a final SWCP is required prior to construction of improvements. Implementation of the PWD- approved SWCP would ensure that impacts related to polluted runoff from project operation would be less than significant. Conformance of the proposed project with this PWD requirement would result in a less than significant impact. iv) Impede or redirect flood flows? (Less than significant) The subject property is located within Flood Zone X, which is not a Special Flood Hazard Area as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The proposed development will be completely contained within the boundaries of Flood Zone X. Therefore, the project will not require floodplain permits or flood-related improvements, and there is no potential for the proposed project to impede or redirect flood flows. d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, would the project risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? (Less than significant) Seiche, tsunami, and mudflow events are generally associated with large bodies or large flows of water. The subject property is not located in close proximity any of the County’s large water bodies. Additionally, there is no proposal to remove or modify any existing dam, levee, or other infrastructure used to divert or otherwise control large volumes of water as part of the project. The subject property is also located within Flood Zone X, which is not a Special Flood Hazard Area as determined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and there is no proposed development included in this project. As such, the project will not require floodplain permits or flood-related improvements. Therefore, the proposed project will not have a significant impact related to the risk of releasing pollutants due to project inundation in flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones. 31 e) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? (Less than significant) The proposed project would not substantially alter the drainage pattern of the site or area or conflict with or obstruct the implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan. Division 914 of the County Ordinance Code requires that all storm water entering and/or originating on this property to be collected and conveyed, without diversion and within an adequate storm drainage system, to an adequate natural watercourse having a definable bed and banks or to an existing adequate public storm drainage system which conveys the storm water to an adequate natural watercourse. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one addit ional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. PWD has stated that review of a final SWCP is required prior to construction of improvements. Conformance of the proposed project with this PWD requirement would ensure the project does not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan, thus resulting in a less than significant impact. 11. LAND USE AND PLANNING – Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? SUMMARY: a) Would the project physically divide an established community? (No impact) The subject site is an approximately 69.32-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Norris Canyon Road and Ashbourne Drive in the unincorporated San Ramon area. The subject property is located within both the Agricultural Lands (AL) and the Single-Family Residential Low Density (SL) General Plan Land Use designations, as well as the Agricultural Preserve (A-4) Zoning District. The surrounding area consists of various types of agricultural and residential uses. The proposed project consists of rezoning the southern portion of the property to Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20) and subdividing the subject property into two new parcels. The subject property is already surrounded by agricultural and residential properties, and there is no development proposed as a part of this project. The proposed subdivision would maintain the established community setting. Thus, the proposed project would not divide an established community. 32 b) Would the project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avo iding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Less than significant) The subject property is located within both the Agricultural Lands (AL) and the Single-Family Residential Low Density (SL) General Plan Land Use designations, as well as the Agricultura l Preserve (A-4) Zoning District. The surrounding area consists of various types of agricultural and residential uses. Currently, the subject property is a 69.32-acre property bisected by Norris Canyon Road into two separate APNs but remains one developabl e parcel. San Catanio Creek is adjacent to the south of Norris Canyon Road and runs parallel to it. The northern half of the property contains a single-family residence in the northeast corner with associated accessory structures and improvements, while the southern half is vacant. The applicant proposes to rezone APN 211-210-029 from Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) to Exclusive Agricultural District (A- 20), and subdivide the 69.32-acre subject property into two new parcels. These two new parcels are proposed as Parcel A and Parcel B, with 38.38 acres and 30.96 acres of total area, respectively. The proposed project also includes a variance to allow proposed Parcel A to have a total area of 38.38 acres, where the A-4 district requires a minimum of 40 acres. The intent of the AL land use designation is to preserve and protect lands capable of and generally used for the production of food, fiber, and plant materials. The title is intended to be descriptive of the predominant land -extensive agricultural uses that take place in these areas, but the land use title or description shall not be used to exclude or limit other types of agricultural, open space, or non-urban uses such as landfills, except as noted below in the descriptions of Agricultural Core, Delta Recreation and Resources, Watershed, Parks and Recreation, and Open Space. This land use designation includes most of the privately-owned rural lands in the county, excluding private lands that are composed of prime soils or lands located in or near the Delta. Most of these lands are in hilly portions of the county and are used for grazing livestock or dry grain farming. After the proposed rezoning and subdivision of the property, the two parcels would remain consistent with the AL designation. According to its Williamson Act contract, the proposed Parcel A would continue to be utilized for cattle grazing and dry farming , and would thus remain in compliance with the intent and purpose of the Agricultural Preserve District (A-4). Parcel B, although not in a Williamson Act contract, would be in the Exclusive Agricultural District (A -20). The purpose of the A-20 zoning district is to provide and protect areas for agricultural uses by preventing the establishment of urban and any other incompatible land use s thereon, and the land uses allowed are all agricultural in nature. As discussed in the “biological resources” section of this Initial Study, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan / N atural Community Conservation Plan in May 2007. The HCP/NCCP is the only adopted habitat conservation plan in Contra Costa County. The subject property’s location in the unincorporated San Ramon area is outside of the covered area for the HCP/NCCP, and therefore, the proposed 33 project would not affect the HCP/NCCP. Therefore, there will be a less than significant impact to land use plans and regulations for the subject property adopted for mitigating an environmental effect. 12. MINERAL RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? SUMMARY: a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (No impact) The project site is not within an area of known m ineral importance according to Figure 8-4 in the Conservation Element of the General Plan, and therefore, the project would not result in the loss of availability of any known mineral resource. b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (No impact) The project site is not within an area of known mineral importance according to Figure 8-4 in the Conservation Element of the General Plan, and therefore, the project would not impact any mineral resource recovery site. 13. NOISE – Would the project: a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 34 SUMMARY: a) Would the project result in generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Less than significant) The proposed project involves rezoning the southern por tion of the subject 69.32-acre property and subdividing it into two new parcels. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. If development is proposed on Parcel B, d uring project grading and construction there may be periods of time where there would be loud noise from construction equipment, vehicles, and tools. Although grading and construction activities would be temporary, such activities could have a potentially significant adverse environmental impact during project construction. Consequently, the project proponent is required to implement the noise mitigation measure Noise-1 to bring potential noise impacts to a less than significant level. Mitigation Measure Noise-1: The following noise reduction measures shall be implemented during project construction and shall be included on all construction plans. 1. The applicant shall make a good faith effort to minimize project-related disruptions to adjacent properties, and to uses on the site. This shall be communicated to all project -related contractors. 2. The applicant shall require their contractors and subcontractors to fit all internal combustion engines with mufflers which are in good condition and shall locate stationary noise- generating equipment such as air compressors as far away from existing residences as possible. 3. Large trucks and heavy equipment are subject to the same restrictions that are i mposed on construction activities, except that the hours are limited to 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM. 4. All construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and are prohibited on State and Federal holidays on the calendar dates that these holidays are observed by the state or federal government as listed below: o New Year’s Day (State and Federal) o Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. (State and Federal) o Washington’s Birthday (Federal) 35 o Lincoln’s Birthday (State) o President’s Day (State and Federal) o Cesar Chavez Day (State) o Memorial Day (State and Federal) o Independence Day (State and Federal) o Labor Day (State and Federal) o Columbus Day (State and Federal) o Veterans Day (State and Federal) o Thanksgiving Day (State and Federal) o Day after Thanksgiving (State) o Christmas Day (State and Federal) b) Would the project result in generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Less than significant) Residential and agricultural use of the project site would not generate significant ground borne vibration. Also, the project does not include any components (e.g., pile driving) that would generate excessive ground-borne vibration levels during construction activities. Therefore, there would be a less than significant impact on ground-borne vibration or noise levels. c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use air port, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (No impact) The subject property is not located within the coverage area of the Contra Costa County Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan, as shown in Figure 5-5 of the County General Plan. The nearest public airport in Contra Costa County is Buchanan Field, which is located approximately 16 miles north of the subject property. Additionally, there are no established private airstrips in Contra Costa County. Thus the proposed project is not considered to be located within an area where airport operations present a potential hazard. 14. POPULATION AND HOUSING – Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? 36 SUMMARY: a) Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (Less than significant) The project includes the rezoning and subdivision of the subject property into two new parcels, which would have the potential to directly increase the unincorporated San Ramon area population by an estimated three people, based on the Census 2010 estimate of 2.77 people per household for Contra Costa County. Currently, the property contains a single-family residence in the northeastern corner, so the net increase in population would be approximately three people with the potential to develop one more residence . The County General Plan’s Growth Management Plan standards generally consider an increase of 1,000 people as the thres hold of significance. Therefore, the impact of adding three people to the unincorporated San Ramon area would be less than significant. b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (No impact) The subject property currently contains a single-family residence in the northeastern corner and is surrounded by residential and agricultural uses. The proposed project involves the rezoning of the subject property from Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) to Exclusive Agricultural District (A- 20) and subdividing the existing parcel into two new parcels. This would not cause a reduction in the number of housing units in the area. Rather, the project proposes to create the potential for one additional living unit in the unincorporated San Ramon area. Therefore, the project would not have a negative effect on existing people or housing. 15. Public Services – Would the project result in substantial adverse physical i mpacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire Protection? b) Police Protection? c) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? SUMMARY: Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 37 a) Fire Protection? (Less than significant) Fire protection and emergency medical response services for the project vicinity are provided by San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (SRVFPD). The SRVFPD submitted comments on the project application detailing requirements for emergency access, water supply, weed abatement, and SRVFPD review of building permit submittals, amongst other items. Currently, no development is proposed as part of this project. However, prior to submittal of building permits for any future development, the project plans would be need to be reviewed and approved by the SRVFPD. As a result, potential impacts of the proposed project on fire protection services would be less than significant. b) Police Protection? (Less than significant) Police protection services in the project vicinity are provided by the Contra Costa County Sheriff’s Office, through the Valley Station, located approximately 10.5 miles driving distance to the north of the project site. Public protection standards under Policy 4-c of the Growth Management Program (GMP) of the County General Plan require a Sheriff facility standard of 155 square feet of station area and support facilities per 1,000 in population shall be maintained within the unincorporated area of the County. The proposed projec t would not induce a significant population increase within the County that would equal or exceed 1,000 persons. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property, which would directly increase the unincorporated San Ramon area population by an estimated three people, based on the Census 2010 estimate of 2.77 people per hous ehold for Contra Costa County. Therefore, the proposed project will not increase the Sheriff or support facility requirements for the area. c) Schools? (Less than significant) Public education services for students from the San Ramon area are provided by the San Ramon Valley Unified School District. These students attend Twin Creeks Elementary School, Iron Horse Middle School, and California High School. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. For a new residence, the applicant would be required to pay the state-mandated school impact fees. Payment of the fees pursuant to State regulations for school services would reduce school impacts to less than significant levels. d) Parks? (Less than significant) Parks and recreation standards under the GMP require three acres of neighborhood park area per 1,000 in population. The proposed project would not induce a significant population increase within the County that would equal or exceed 1,000 persons. Although no development is 38 proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property, which would directly increase the unincorporated San Ramon area population by an estimated three people, based on the Census 2010 estimate of 2.77 people per household for Contra Costa County. Furthermore, the applicant would be required to pay a Park Impact Fee for each new residence, which is used to acquire parkland and develop parks and recreation facilities to serve new residential development in the unincorporated areas of the County. Thus, there would be a less than significant impact from this project on the use of the local public parks and recreational facilities by residents of the San Ramon area. e) Other public facilities? (Less than significant) Libraries: Contra Costa Library operates 25 facilities in Contra Costa County. The closest facility is the San Ramon Library, which is approximately 8.5 miles driving distance to the east of the subject property. The Contra Costa Library system is primarily funded by local property taxes, with additional revenue from intergovernmental sources. Accordingly, there would be no impact created by the operation of the proposed facility on the public libraries utilized by residents of Contra Costa. Health Facilities: Contra Costa County Health Services District (CCCHSD) operates a regional medical center (hospital) and 11 health centers and clinics in the County. County health facilities generally serve low income and uninsured patients. CCCHSD is primarily funded by federal and state funding programs, with additional revenue from local taxes. Thus, there would be no impact created by the operation of the proposed facility on the use of public health facilities by residents of the Contra Costa County. 16. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? SUMMARY: a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Less than significant). 39 As discussed in the “public services” section of this Initial Study, parks and recreation standards under the GMP require three acres of neighborhood park area per 1,000 in population. The proposed two-lot subdivision at the project site would not induce a substantial population increase within the County. Thus, there would be a less than significant impact from this project on the use of the local public parks and recreational facilities by residents of the unincorporated San Ramon area. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansio n of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Less than significant) The proposed two-lot subdivision at the project site would not result in a substantial increase in residential population. Parks and recreation standards under the GMP require three acres of neighborhood park area per 1,000 in population. Thus, there would be a less than significant impact or result from this project on the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. 17. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC – Would the project: a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) c) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? d) Result in inadequate emergency access? SUMMARY: a) Would the project conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities? (Less than significant) Policy 4-c of the Growth Management Element of the General Plan requires a traffic impact analysis of any project that is estimated to generate 100 or more additional AM or PM peak-hour trips. The proposed project consisting of a two-lot subdivision has the potential to generate an estimated two AM and two PM peak-hour trips, and therefore, is not required to have a project- specific traffic impact analysis. Since the project would yield less than 100 peak hour AM or PM trips, the proposed project would not conflict with the circulation system in the unincorporated San Ramon area. The Contra Costa Transportation Authority is responsible for ensuring local government conformance with the Congestion Management Program (CMP), a program aimed at reducing regional traffic congestion. The CMP requires that each local jurisdiction identify existing and 40 future transportation facilities that will operate below an acceptable service level and provide mitigation where future growth degrades that service level. The Contra Costa Transportation Authority has review responsibility for proposed development projects that are expected to generate 100 or more additional peak-hours trips. As the project would yield less than 100 additional peak hour AM or PM trips, the proposed project would not conflict with the CMP would result in a less than significant impact. b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b) (Less than significant) In analyzing land use projects under CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b), vehicle miles traveled (VMT) exceeding an applicable threshold of significance may indicate a significant impact. The provisions of this section shall apply prospectively as described in section 15007. A lead agency may elect to be governed by the provisions of this section immedia tely. Beginning on July 1, 2020, the provisions of this section shall apply statewide. As it is prior to this effective date, this project has been reviewed under existing County transportation standards. Policy 4-c of the Growth Management Element of the General Plan requires a traffic impact analysis of any project that is estimated to generate 100 or more additional AM or PM peak -hour trips. The applicant proposes to rezone the southern portion of the property and subdivide the 69.32-acre parcel into two new parcels, which would have the potential to generate an estimated two AM and two PM peak-hour trips, and therefore, is not required to have a project-specific traffic impact analysis. Since the project would yield less than 100 peak hour AM or PM trips, the proposed project would have c) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Less than significant) Overall, the project would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature. The proposed project includes the subdivision of the subject property into two new lots, but no development is currently proposed with this subdivision. The subject property is bisected by Norris Canyon Road, which is a major road in the San Ramon area. Norris Canon Road is designated as a two-lane arterial in the General Plan. Right-of-way acquisition and improvements to these standards were completed as part of the nearby Norris Canyon Estates su bdivision in the early 2000’s. No additional widening or improvements would be required relative to this subdivision. The proposed Parcel A contains an existing residence with full driveway improvements, but Parcel B’s access from Norris Canyon Road is heavily restricted by San Catanio Creek, which parallels the road. However, Tract 7578, which abuts a portion of the eastern boundary of Parcel B, dedicated access and utility easements to Parcel B over Ashbourne Drive south of the creek to provide alternate access to Norris Canyon Road. Although there is no development proposed as part of this project, any future development would be required to meet the requirements of Title 9 of the County Ordinance and receive the approval of 41 the County Public Works Department. Therefore, the project would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature. e) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? (Less than significant) The proposed project includes the subdivision of the subject property into two new lots, but no development is currently proposed with this subdivision. The subject property is located on Norris Canyon Road, which is a major road in the San Ramon area. Norris Canyon Road also connects to two other major roads in the nearby area, including Bollinger Canyon Road and San Ramon Valley Boulevard, all three of which connect to Interstate 680. These roads and I-680 would be used in the event of an emergency requiring evacuation of the local area. The location of the project would not cause it to significantly impair or interfere with emergency evacuation. In addition, the project was sent to the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (SRVFPD) for comments. The SRVFPD submitted comments on the project application detailing requirements for emergency access, water supply, weed abatement, and SRVFPD review of building permit submittals, amongst other items. If development is proposed in the future, the project plans would need to be reviewed and approved by the SRVFPD. Accordingly, the project would have a less than significant impact on emergency access with the SRVFPD comments integrated into the project and their approval of any future building plans. 18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object w ith cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of P ublic Resources Code Section 5024.1? SUMMARY: Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k)? (No impact) 42 As discussed in “cultural resources” Section 5.a of this Initial Study, the California Public Resources code defines a historical resource as a resource that has been listed or is eligible for listing on the California Historical Register of Historical Resources, a resource included in a local register of historical resources, or identified as significant in a historical survey meeting the requirements of the Public Resources Code. As there are no buildings or structures on-site listed on Contra Costa County’s Historic Resources Inventory, on California’s Registe r of Historical Resources, or the National Register of Historic places, nor any building or structure that qualifies to be listed, the project site would not be considered a historical resource, and there would be no potential impact for the proposed project resulting in an adverse change of a historical resource. Thus, the proposed gas station reconstruction would have no impact on visible tribal cultural resources. b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantia l evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. (Less than significant with mitigation) The proposed project was distributed to Wilton Rancheria of the Department of Environmental Resources on May 29, 2019. As discussed in “cultural resources” Sections 5.b, 5.c, and 5.d of this Initial Study, the project site is already urbanized and has no discernable archaeological or paleontological features; however, there is a possibility that buried archaeological or paleontological resources, or human remains, could be present and accidental discovery could occur during grading and other earthwork on the project site, resulting in a potentially significant adverse environmental impact on tribal cultural resources. As a result, the applicant is required to implement mitigation measures CUL-1, CUL-2 and CUL-3. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce the impact from accidental discovery to a less than significant level. 19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS – Would the project: a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? 43 d) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? e) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? SUMMARY: a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmenta l effects? (Less than significant) The proposed project would incrementally increase wastewater flows. The project site is served by the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD). Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. Any future development would be required to be reviewed and approved by CCCSD to ensure compliance with their wastewater standards. By meeting the development standards of CCCSD, the proposed project is expected to be accommodated by CCCSD facilities without expansion of the wastewater treatment system . The project site is not served by a water service provider. As no development is currently proposed, it is not anticipated that new water facilities will be required to accommodate the project, as there would be no increased requirements for water service. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. Any future development would be required to be reviewed and approved by CCEHD to ensure existing and/or proposed well water facilities meet CCEHD standards. Natural gas and electric power facilities are provided by Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E). These facilities would also be required to be reviewed by PG&E prior to building permits if development is proposed in the future. By having future development reviewed by respective agencies for compliance with development standards, there would be a less than significant impact. As discussed in the “hydrology and water quality” section of this Initial Study, a Stormwater Control Plan (SWCP) is required for applications that will create and/or redevelop impervious surface area exceeding 10,000 square feet in compliance with the County’s Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (§1014) and the County’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. As the proposed Parcel A is already developed and the southern parcel has nearby access rights to Ashbourne Drive (a private street) and public utilities, it is conceivable the potenti al new impervious surfaces resulting from development of Parcel B will fall below the 10,000 square - foot threshold to require a SWCP at this time. However, further development of the parcel may need to comply with the latest Stormwater Management and Discharge Control Ordinance (§1014) and the County’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) National Pollutant 44 Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit. PWD has stated that review of the final SWCP is required prior to construction of improvements. Implementation of a PWD-approved SWCP would ensure that impact on water quality from project operation would be less than significant. b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (Less than significant) The project site is not served by a water service provider. As no development is currently proposed, it is not anticipated that new water facilities will be required to accommodate the project, as there would be no increased requirements for water service. Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. Any future development would be required to be reviewed and approved by CCEHD to ensure existing and/or proposed well water facilities meet CCEHD standards. Meeting CCEHD requirements regarding well water would ensure that sufficient water supply exists for the proposed project. Accordingly, the impact of providing water service to the proposed project would be less than significant. c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? (Less than significant) The proposed project would incrementally increase wastewater flows. The project site is served by the Central Contra Costa Sanitary District (CCCSD). Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. Any future development would be required to be reviewed and approved by CCCSD to ensure compliance with their wastewater standards. By meeting the development standards of CCCSD, the proposed project is expected to be accommodated by CCCSD facilities without expansion of the wastewater treatment system. d) Would the project generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? (Less than significant) Although no development is proposed as part of this project, the project would have the potential to construct one additional residence on Parcel B subsequent to subdividing the subject property. Future development would generate construction solid waste and post-construction residential solid waste. Construction waste in Contra Costa County is diverted away from landfills and recycled through the three established transfer stations in the County. Construction on the project site would be subject to the CalGreen Construction and Demolition Debris Recovery Program administered by the CDD at the time of application for a building permit. The Debris Recovery Program would eliminate the construction debris headed to the landfill by diverting materials that can be recycled to appropriate recycling facilities. 45 With respect to residential solid waste, the receiving landfill is the Keller Canyon Landfill, located at 901 Bailey Road in Bay Point. Keller Canyon is estimated to be at 15 percent of capacity. Residential waste from the proposed project would incrementally add to the operational waste headed to the landfill; however, the impact of the project -related residential waste is considered to be less than significant. A portion of the residential waste is expected to be recycled, and would thereby reduce the residential waste headed to the landfill. e) Would the project comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (No impact) The proposed project would comply with applicable federal, state, and local laws related to solid waste. The project includes agricultural and residential land uses that would not result in the generation of unique types of solid waste that in conflict with existing regulations applicable to solid waste. Furthermore, compliance with CalGreen’s solid waste requirements, such as the Construction and Demolition Debris Recovery Program, the project would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws related to solid waste. 20. WILDFIRE – If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby, expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? SUMMARY: If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard s everity zones, would the project: a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Less than significant) 46 The subject property is located within the State responsibility area and is classified as a “high” fire hazard severity zone by CalFire. The proposed project includes the subdivision of the subject property into two new lots, but no development is currently proposed with this subdivision. The subject property is located on Norris Canyon Road, which is a major road in the San Ramon area. Norris Canyon Road also connects to two other major roads in the nearby area, including Bollinger Canyon Road and San Ramon Valley Boulevard, all three of which connect to Interstate 680. These roads and I-680 would be used in the event of an emergency requiring evacuation of the local area. The location of the project would not cause it to significantly impair or interfere with emergency evacuation. In addition, the project was sent to the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (SRVFPD) for comments. The SRVFPD submitted comments on the project application detailing requirements for emergency access, water supply, weed abatement, and SRVFPD review of building permit submittals, amongst other items. If development is proposed in the future, the project plans would need to be reviewed and approved by the SRVFPD. Therefore, the proposed project will have a less than significant impact on any adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby, expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the un controlled spread of a wildfire? (Less than significant) The property slopes moderately, with overall elevation changes upwards of 300 feet from its lowest to highest points. The proposed project includes the subdivision of the subject property into two new lots, but no development is currently proposed with this subdivision . This proposed project does not involve the routine use or storage of combustible or flammable materials, nor does it involve activities normally associated with the ignition of wildfires. However, to ensure that the proposed facility does not pose a significant risk of exacerbating wildfire, th e project requires the approval of SRVFPD prior to obtaining building permits for site improvements and beginning operation. Therefore, the proposed project will have a less than significant potential to exacerbate wildfire risks and expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors. c) Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? (Less than significant) The proposed project includes the subdivision of the subject property into two new lots , but no development is currently proposed with this subdivision. The subject property is located on Norris Canyon Road, which is a major road in the San Ramon area. Norris Canyon Road also connects to two other major roads in the nearby area, including Bo llinger Canyon Road and San Ramon Valley Boulevard, all three of which connect to Interstate 680. These roads and I-680 would be used in the event of an emergency requiring evacuation of the local area. The location of the project would not cause it to significantly impair or interfere with emergency evacuation. In 47 addition, the project was sent to the San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District (SRVFPD) for comments. The SRVFPD submitted comments on the project application detailing requirements for emergency access, water supply, weed abatement, and SRVFPD review of building permit submittals, amongst other items. If development is proposed in the future, the project plans would need to be reviewed and approved by the SRVFPD. However, as no development is proposed, the proposed project currently does not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment, as there is already infrastructure in place for the existing development on-site. d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? (Less than significant with mitigation) As discussed in Geology Section 7(iv), the two BGC investigations focused on potential geologic risks associated with future development of a single -family residence(s) within their study area, which included both of the proposed parcels that are the subject of MS18-0008. The conclusions and recommendations of BGC are intended to provide general recommendations to guide the owner/ future developer. Further geotechnical analysis would be required prior to the construction of a single-family residence on the proposed parcels. Upon review of the two BGC investigations, DMA concluded that there would be a potentially significant impact due to landslides. Consequently, the applicant is required to implement mitigation measures Geology 1, 2 and 3. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce the potential to expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or la ndslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes to a less than significant level. 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) 48 c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? SUMMARY: a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? (Less than significant) The applicant proposes to rezone APN 211-210-029 from Agricultural Preserve District (A-4) to Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20), and subdivide the subject 69.32-acre subject property into two new parcels. These two new parcels are proposed as Parcel A and Parcel B, with 38.38 acres and 30.96 acres of total area, respectively. The proposed project also includes a variance to allow proposed Parcel A to have a total area of 38.38 acres, where the A -4 district requires a minimum of 40 acres. No development is proposed as a part of this project. The subject site is an approximately 69.32-acre parcel located at the northeast corner of Norris Canyon Road and Ashbourne Drive in the unincorporated San Ramon area. The subject property is located within both the Agricultural Lands (AL) and the Single-Family Residential Low Density (SL) General Plan Land Use designations, as well as the Agricultural Preserve (A-4) Zoning District. The land to the northeast, west and south of the property ar e established open space and agricultural lands, and the area adjacent to the southeast of the subject property is the Norris Canyon Estates development. With the incorporated project mitigations and due to the relatively small scale of the proposed project, the potential for the proposed project to degrade the quality of the environment, reduce habitat, threaten wildlife, or eliminate examples of California history is less than significant. Where mitigation measures are proposed in this Initial Study, the measures will be conditions of approval of the proposed project and the applicant will be responsible for implementation of the measures. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) (Less than significant) The proposed project would not create substantial cumulative impacts. The project site is located within the Urban Limit Line in an area that has been designated for agricultural use, surrounded by both single-family residential development and agricultural land, and the proposed project would be consistent with the existing development surrounding it. In addition, there will be no significant increase in the demand for public services such as water, sewage disposal, or solid waste disposal that would require new or significantly expanded infrastructure improvements that 49 could impact the environment. In other words, the proposed project is of a nature and scale that has minimal impacts in areas such as aesthetics, biology, cultural resources, geology, noise, tribal cultural resources, and wildfire, which can often cause an impact to the environment when viewed cumulatively over various projects. c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? (Less than significant) This Initial Study has disclosed impacts that would be less than significant with the implementation of mitigation measures. All identified mitigation measures will be included in the conditions of approval for the proposed project, and the applicant will be responsible for implementation of the measures. As a result, there would not be any environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 50 REFERENCES In the process of preparing the Initial Study Checklist and conduction of the evaluation, the following references (which are available for review at the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development, 30 Muir Rd., Martinez, CA 94553) were consulted: 1. Project Application and Plans 2. Agency Comments 3. Contra Costa County General Plan (2005-2025) 4. Contra Costa County Ordinance (Title 8) 5. Contra Costa County Historic Resources Inventory (December 2010) 6. Office of Historic Preservation: California Register of Historical Resources (Webpage) http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/listedresources/ 7. County Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Data Layers 8. 2014 Contra Costa County Important Farmland Map (Webpage) ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2014/con14.pdf 9. Contra Cost County ECCC HCP/NCCP 10. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Bay Area 2017 Clean Air Plan. 11. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines; Updated May 2017. 12. CalEEMod (Version 2013.2.2) 13. California Important Famland Finder (Webpage). https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/ 14. California Department of Conservation. Contra Costa County Tsunami Inundation Maps (Webpage) https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/tsunami/maps/Contra-Costa 15. CAL FIRE. Contra Costa County Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Area, As Recommended By CAL FIRE. (Webpage) https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6660/fhszl_map7.pdf 16. CAL FIRE. Contra Costa County Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area, Adopted by CAL FIRE on November 7, 2007. (Webpage) https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6662/fhszs_map7.pdf 17. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Webpage) https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/ 18. 2019 California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines 19. CalRecycle, Facility/Site Summary Details: Keller Canyon Landfill (07-AA-0032) (Webpage) http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/Directory/07-AA-0032/Detail/ 51 20. Contra Costa County, 2010 Census (Webpage) http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/5342/Demographics 21. Contra Costa County Sheriff, Patrol Division (Webpage) http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/208/Patrol-Division 22. Contra Costa County Waste Reduction and Recycling (Webpage) http://www.cccounty.us/depart/cd/recycle/ 23. Contra Costa Library (Webpage) http://ccclib.org/ 24. Contra Costa Health Services (Webpage) http://cchealth.org/eh/land-use/ 25. Clean Water Act (Webpage) http://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-clean-water-act 26. Darwin Myers Associates, 2019. CEQA Analysis. 27. Darwin Myers Associates, 2019. Geologic Peer Review. 28. Federal Clean Air Act (Webpage) http://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview 29. Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List - “Cortese List” (Webpage) http://www.calepa.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/CorteseList/ 30. Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division, 2019. Memorandum: Subdivision MS18-0008, Staff Report & Conditions of Approval. 31. San Ramon Valley Fire Protection District, Fire Stations (Webpage) https://firedepartment.org/our-district/district-overview/stations-facilities 32. San Ramon Valley Unified School District (Webpage) https://www.srvusd.net/ 33. United States Department of Fish and Wildlife (Webpage) http://www.fws.gov/ 34. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (Webpage) http://www3.epa.gov/ 35. West Contra Costa Unified School District (Webpage) http://www.wccusd.net/ 52 ATTACHMENTS 1) Mitigation Monitoring Program 2) County Parcel Page 3) Printout of Subject Property and Surrounding General Plan Designations 4) Printout of Subject Property and Surrounding Zoning Districts 5) Aerial View of Subject Property and Vicinity 6) Project Plans Mitigation Monitoring Program County File #MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 2350 Norris Canyon Road San Ramon, CA 94583 August 1, 2019 Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring Program Condition of Approval (COA) MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) Public Works Department (PWD) Page 2 of 9 SECTION 1: AESTHETICS Potentially Significant Impacts: Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, the project could potentially a) have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista, b) substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcr oppings, and historic building within a state scenic highway, and c) substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. Mitigation Measures: Aesthetics-1 (AES-1): Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the project sponsor shall identify a building envelope on Parcel B, subject to the review and approval of CDD. This building envelope shall be limited to two acres in total area and shall be located in such a way as to minimize visual impacts as viewed from Norris Canyon Road. Aesthetics-2 (AES-2): Prior to the submittal of building permits on Parcel B, the project sponsor shall submit the proposed plans for the review and approval of CDD. In addition to architectural plans for the development, the plans shall include screening elements to minimize visual impacts from neighboring properties and visual impacts as viewed from Norris Canyon Road. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to DCD approval of construction documents and throughout construction-related activity. Responsible Department or Agency: Project proponent, DCD, and Building Inspection Division. Compliance Verification: DCD review and approval of construction documents, and verification in field by Building Inspection Division. SECTION 5: BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Potentially Significant Impact: Construction activities on the project site could (a) have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mitigation Measures: Biology 1 (BIO-1): Prior to the submittal of building permits or any ground disturbance activities, the project sponsor shall employ a biologist familiar with State- and Federally-protected wildlife and plant species native to the Contra Costa County area shall conduct a preconstruction survey to assess the site’s biological resources. This study shall i dentify all protected wildlife and plant species and provide mitigation measures to preserve these resources. These mitigation measures shall be implemented by the project sponsor and be monitored by the consulting biologist throughout construction of the project. Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring Program Condition of Approval (COA) MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) Public Works Department (PWD) Page 3 of 9 Biology 2 (BIO-2): The following general avoidance and minimization measures shall be implemented throughout the construction activities to avoid potential impacts to sensitive biological resources. 1. All staging, maintenance, and storage of construction equipment will be performed in a manner to preclude any direct or indirect discharge of fuel, oil, or other petroleum products into waters of the U.S./State. No other debris, rubbish, creosote-treated wood, soil, silt, sand, cement, concrete or washings thereof, or other construction-related materials or wastes will be allowed to enter into or be placed where they may be washed by rainfall or runoff into waters of the U.S./State. All such debris and waste shall be picked-up daily and properly disposed of at an appropriate site. 2. All food-related trash items such as wrappers, cans, bottles, and food scraps will be disposed of in closed containers and removed at least once a day from the project site. 3. No firearms will be allowed on the project site e xcept for those carried by authorized security personnel, or local, State, or Federal law enforcement officials. 4. Project personnel shall not have dogs or cats in the project area. 5. Project personnel will not be permitted to smoke in the project area. 6. No pesticides of any kind will be used on the project site at any time during project implementation. 7. No equipment will be operated in areas of flowing or standing water. No fueling, cleaning, or maintenance of vehicles or equipment will take place within any areas where an accidental discharge to waters of the U.S./State waters may occur. 8. All equipment including excavators, trucks, hand tools, etc., that may have come in contact with invasive plants or the seeds of these plants, will be carefully cleane d before arriving on the site and shall also be carefully cleaned before removal from the site to prevent spread of these plants. 9. Disturbance or removal of vegetation will not exceed the minimum necessary to complete construction. 10. To minimize harassment, injury, death, and harm in the form of temporary habitat disturbances, all project-related vehicle traffic will be restricted to established roads, construction areas, equipment staging, parking, and stockpile areas. Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring Program Condition of Approval (COA) MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) Public Works Department (PWD) Page 4 of 9 11. Along the length of the onsite portion of San Catanio Creek, the work area will be delineated with orange silt fencing in order to minimize impacts to habitat beyond the work limit. This fencing will remain in place until all ground moving operations have ceased. Orange cyclone fencing, or other materials that can entrap small amphibians and reptiles and other small wildlife species, will not be used. 12. For each onsite tree proposed for preservation, a root protection zone will be established, extending from the trunk to the dripline (the outer extent of the tree canopy). This root protection zone will be fenced off from the work area with construction fencing in order to protect the preserved trees from inadvertent damage due to ground moving, compaction, and/or limb removal within the footprint of the dripline. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to submittal of building permits and during construction activities. Responsible Department or Agency: Project proponent and DCD. Compliance Verification: Submit biological report to DCD for review and approval, and verification in the field by Building Inspection Division. SECTION 5: CULTURAL RESOURCES Potentially Significant Impact: Construction activities on the project site could (b) cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5, (c) directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature, and (d) disturb human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. Mitigation Measures: Cultural Resources 1 (CUL-1): If deposits of prehistoric or historical archaeological materials are encountered during ground disturbance activities, all work within 30 yards of these materials shall be stopped until a professional archaeologist who is certified by the Society for Cal ifornia Archaeology (SCA) and/or the Society of Professional Archaeology (SOPA), and the Native American tribe that has requested consultation and/or demonstrated interest in the project site, have had an opportunity to evaluate the significance of the find and suggest appropriate mitigation(s) if deemed necessary. Cultural Resources 2 (CUL-2): If the deposits are not eligible, avoidance is not necessary. If the deposits are eligible, they will need to be avoided by impacts or such impacts must be mitigate d. Upon completion of the archaeological assessment, a report should be prepared documenting the methods, results, and recommendations. The report should be submitted to the Northwest Information Center and appropriate Contra Costa County agencies. Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring Program Condition of Approval (COA) MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) Public Works Department (PWD) Page 5 of 9 Prehistoric materials can include flake-stone tools (e.g., projectile points, knives, choppers) or obsidian, chert, or quartzite tool-making debris; culturally darkened soil (i.e., midden soil often containing heat - affected rock, ash and charcoal, shellfish remains, and cultural materials); and stone milling equipment (e.g., mortars, pestles, handstones). Historical materials can include wood, stone, concrete, or adobe footings, walls and other structural remains; debris-filled wells or privies; and deposits of wood, glass ceramics, and other refuse. Cultural Resources 3 (CUL-3): If human remains are encountered, work within 50 feet of the discovery should be redirected and the County Coroner notified immediately. At the same time, an archaeologist should be contacted to assess the situation. If the human remains are of a Native American origin, the Coroner must notify the Native American Heritage Commission within 24 hours of this identification. The Native American Heritage Commission will identify a Most Likel y Descendant (MLD) to inspect the property and provide recommendations for the proper treatment of the remains and associated grave goods. Upon completion of the assessment, the archaeologist should prepare a report documenting the methods and results, and provide recommendations for the treatment of the human remains and any associated cultural materials, as appropriate and in coordination with the recommendations of the MLD. The report should be submitted to the Northwest Information Center and appropria te Contra Costa agencies. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: During construction activities. Responsible Department or Agency: Project proponent and DCD. Compliance Verification: Submit archaeological report to DCD for review and approval if there is a qualifying find on-site. SECTION 7: GEOLOGY AND SOILS Potentially Significant Impact: Construction activities on the project site could (a) expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: (iii) seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, (iv) landslides, (b) result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil, (c) be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse, (d) be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property, and (f) directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. Mitigation Measures: Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring Program Condition of Approval (COA) MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) Public Works Department (PWD) Page 6 of 9 Geology 1 (GEO-1): At least 60 days prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the applicant shall submit a geology, soil, and foundation report that meets the requirements of Subdivision Ordinance Section 94-4.420 for review by the County Peer Review Geologist, and review and approval by the CDD. Improvement, grading, and building plans shall carry out the recommendations of the approved report. This report shall include evaluation of: (i) based on adequate subsurface exploration, laboratory testing and engineering analysis, the required investigation shall include evaluation of potential hazards and provide appropriate recommendations to mitigate any significant hazards that are confirmed to be present (i.e. landslide, liquefaction, slope creep, expansive and corrosive soils). Detailed design recommendations shall be provided, including (ii) clearing and grading (iii) residential driveway design, (iii) residential foundation design, (iv) drainage, (v) C.3 basin design/ construction, (vi) undergrounding of utilities (particularly within landslide areas), and (vii) operative California Building Code seismic design parameters. Geology 2 (GEO-2): During site grading, drainage and foundation-related work, the project geotechnical engineer shall provide observation and testing services to ensure that the construction is in compliance with recommendations in the approved geotechnical report. The project geotechnical engineer shall provide recommendations for any modification to approved plans th at are deemed necessary based on the actual field conditions encountered during grading. Written approval from the Contra Costa County Building Inspection Division shall be obtained prior to any modification. Documentation of the observation and testing services, as well as other project details shall be presented in a final geotechnical report, to be submitted to the County and kept on file. Geology 3 (GEO-3): Prior to recording the Parcel Map, the applicant shall submit a deed disclosure related to the potential ground failure hazards (liquefaction and landslide), and shall include complete bibliographic citation to the 2000 and 2003 Geologic Feasibility Investigations of Berlogar Geotechnical Consultants, indicate where a copy of these reports can be accessed. Submit a draft of the proposed language to be used in the Deed Disclosure for review and approval by CDD. This review shall be for the purpose that the language used adequately characterizes the hazard posed by ground failure and adverse soils conditions. Following approval of the language, that applicant shall record the deed disclosure and shall provide a copy of the recorded deed disclosure to the CDD . Geology 4: At the time of application for a building or grading permit, whichever occurs first, a construction period erosion and sedimentation control plan that is in compliance with applicable construction period requirements of the State Water Resour ces Control Board and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board shall be included in the submitted construction drawings, and implemented during construction. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, prior to issuance of building permits, and during construction activities. Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring Program Condition of Approval (COA) MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) Public Works Department (PWD) Page 7 of 9 Responsible Department or Agency: Project proponent, DCD and Building Inspection Division. Compliance Verification: Submit required geotechnical reports and plans to DCD for review and approval, and verification in the field by Building Inspection Division. SECTION 12: NOISE Potentially Significant Impact: Construction activities on the project site could (a) expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies, and (d) generate a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Mitigation Measure: Noise-1: The following noise reduction measures shall be implemented during project construction and shall be included on all construction plans. 1. The applicant shall make a good faith effort to minimize project -related disruptions to adjacent properties, and to uses on the site. This shall be communicated to all project-related contractors. 2. The applicant shall require their contractors and subcontractors to fit all internal combustion engines with mufflers which are in good condition and shall locate stationary noise -generating equipment such as air compressors as far away from existing residences as possible. 3. Large trucks and heavy equipment are subject to the same restrictions that are imposed on construction activities, except that the hours are limited to 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM. 4. All construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday, and are prohibited on state and federal holidays on the calendar dates that these holi days are observed by the state or federal government as listed below: o New Year’s Day (State and Federal) o Birthday of Martin Luther King, Jr. (State and Federal) o Washington’s Birthday (Federal) o Lincoln’s Birthday (State) o President’s Day (State and Federal) o Cesar Chavez Day (State) o Memorial Day (State and Federal) o Independence Day (State and Federal) o Labor Day (State and Federal) o Columbus Day (State and Federal) Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring Program Condition of Approval (COA) MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) Public Works Department (PWD) Page 8 of 9 o Veterans Day (State and Federal) o Thanksgiving Day (State and Federal) o Day after Thanksgiving (State) o Christmas Day (State and Federal) Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to DCD approval of construction documents and throughout construction-related activity. Responsible Department or Agency: Project proponent, DCD and Building Inspection Division. Compliance Verification: CDD and Building Inspection’s ongoing monitoring of project compliance. SECTION 17: TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES Potentially Significant Impact: Construction activities on the project site could (a)(ii) cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource Mitigation Measure: The proposed project was distributed to Wilton Rancheria of the Department of Environmental Resources. As discussed in “cultural resources” Sections 5.b, 5.c, and 5.d of this Initial Study, there is a possibility that buried archaeological resources, paleontological resources, or human remains could be present and accidental discovery could occur during grading and other earthwork on the project site, resulting in a potentially significant adverse environmental impact on tribal cultural resources. As a resu lt, the applicant is required to implement mitigation measures CUL-1, CUL-2 and CUL-3. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce the impact from accidental discovery to a less than significant level. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: During construction activities and throughout operations. Responsible Department or Agency: Project proponent and DCD. Compliance Verification: Submit archaeological report to DCD for review and approval if there is a qualifying find on-site. SECTION 20: WILDFIRE Potentially Significant Impact: Construction activities on the project site could (d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes. Mitigation Measures: Abbreviations: Mitigation Monitoring Program Condition of Approval (COA) MS18-0008/RZ19-3249 Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) Public Works Department (PWD) Page 9 of 9 As discussed in Geology Section 7(iv), the two BGC investigations focused on potential geologic risks associated with future development of a single-family residence(s) within their study area, which included both of the proposed parcels that are the subject of MS18-0008. The conclusions and recommendations of BGC are intended to provide general recommendations to guide the owner/ future developer. Further geotechnical analysis would be required prior to the construction of a single-family residence on the proposed parcels. Upon review of the two BGC investigations, DMA concluded that there would be a potentially significant impact due to landslides . Consequently, the applicant is required to implement mitigation measures Geology 1, 2 and 3. Implementation of these mitigation measures would reduce the potential to expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes to a less than significant level. Implementing Action: COA Timing of Verification: Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, prior to issuance of building permits, and during construction activities. Responsible Department or Agency: Project proponent, DCD and Building Inspection Division. Compliance Verification: Submit required geotechnical reports and plans to DCD for review and approval, and verification in the field by Building Inspection Division. 2350 Norris Canyon Road Minor Subdivision Project County File #MS18-0008 & RZ19-3249 COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS JUNE 23, 2020 1 Project Description Subdivision: Subdivide a 69.34-acres parcel into two new parcels, Parcel A (38.38 acres) and Parcel B (30.96 acres). Rezone: Rezone Parcel B from A-4, Agricultural Preserve District, to A-20, Exclusive Agricultural District Variance: Allow Parcel A lot size of 38.38 acres, where A-4 requires 40 acres No development is proposed as a part of this project. 2 Surrounding General Plan Designations 3 Surrounding Zoning Designations 4 Tentative Map 5 Parcel A 6 Parcel B 7 Staff Recommendation FIND that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment; ADOPT the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP); ACKNOWLEGE the CPC approval of the proposed Vesting Tentative Map (County File #MS18-0008) and that no appeals were received; ADOPT Ordinance 2020-06, rezoning the 30.96-acre Parcel B (County File #RZ19-3249) to Exclusive Agricultural District (A-20). APPROVE the 2350 Norris Canyon Road Minor Subdivision Project and the associated findings and conditions of approval. 8 RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. OPEN the public hearing on Resolution 2020/166; RECEIVE public comments, and CLOSE public hearing. 2. FIND that adoption of Resolution 2020/166 is not disputed and collection of assessments is necessary for the cities and unincorporated Contra Costa County (County) for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program and drainage maintenance activities. 3. ADOPT Resolution 2020/166 approving the Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2020–2021 for Stormwater Utility Areas No. 1 through 18, as recommended by the Chief Engineer, Flood Control and Water Conservation District. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed assessments for Stormwater Utility Areas 1 through 18 will provide approximately $15,844,139 in funding for the cities and the County for the NPDES program and drainage maintenance activities. (100% Stormwater Utility Area Assessments) APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Michelle Cordis, (925) 313-2381 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Bob Campbell, County Auditor–Controller, Dorothy Lim, County Auditor-Controller’s Office, Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Ave Brown, Environmental Services, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Courtney Riddle, Contra Costa Clean Water Program, Karin Graves, Contra Costa County Clean Water Program, Michelle Cordis, Flood Control, Andrea Bullock, Contra Costa Clean Water Program, Patrick Melgar, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control D.4 To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Hearing to Adopt Resolution Approving the Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2020–2021, Countywide. Project No. 4500-6X7041, CP# 95-37 BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa Clean Water Program consists of the County, its incorporated cities, and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District) working collectively under a Joint Municipal Stormwater NPDES Permit issued by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. This permit is federally mandated through the Clean Water Act, which was amended in 1987 to specifically address stormwater pollution. The current NPDES Permit, effective January 1, 2016, is in its fifth year of the five-year Municipal San Francisco Bay Region Municipal Regional Stormwater NPDES Permit (MRP 2.0) from the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board. Public education on pollution prevention, trash assessments, inspection of construction sites, as well as commercial and industrial facilities, street sweeping, catch basin cleaning and other forms of drainage maintenance are examples of actions taken to meet permit requirements. An Annual Report is written each year to summarize accomplishments. The Contra Costa Clean Water Program is currently in its fifth year of the Joint Municipal Stormwater NPDES Permit MRP 2.0 issued by the San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board. The Joint Municipal Stormwater NPDES Permit issued by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board for the cities of Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley, and unincorporated East County began in September 2010. The permit includes, for each municipality, a Stormwater Management Plan outlining intended activities designed to reduce or eliminate pollutants from entering the storm drain system. The Regional Boards indicated the need for a restricted funding source to finance implementation costs. In order to meet this need, the County proposed legislation providing a financial option for municipalities to use through the FC District. The bill, AB 2768 (Campbell), was passed by the legislature and signed by Governor Pete Wilson on August 30, 1992. The legislation specifically allowed a municipality to request formation of a Stormwater Utility Area and an assessment to pay for implementation costs. The Board of Supervisors, acting as governing board of the FC District, provided public notice to all affected property owners before the establishment of the Stormwater Utility Areas on June 22, 1993, creating 17 Stormwater Utility Areas. This 1993 Board action also set the first-year assessment rates for each Stormwater Utility Area, as well as maximum rates. Assessments were collected for Fiscal Year 1993–1994 through 2000–2001. On May 9, 2000, the FC District separated the City of Oakley from Stormwater Utility Area 17. The City of Oakley was established as Stormwater Utility Area 18, at that time, and assessments were collected for Fiscal Year 2000–2001. The FC District does not collect this assessment for the cities of Richmond and Brentwood. Richmond and Brentwood collect their NPDES levy as a sewer fee. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2020–2021 are not implemented, the program would have to be funded by the general funds of the cities and County to ensure compliance with NPDES permit requirements. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2020/166 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2020/166 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/23/2020 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2020/166 In The Matter Of: Adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2020–2021, for Stormwater Utility Areas No. 1 through 18, Countywide. Project No. 4500-6X7041, CP# 95-37 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, as the Governing Body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, RESOLVES THAT; The Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act, hereinafter referred to as Act, provides authority for said Governing Body to establish Stormwater Utility Areas and adopt ordinances and resolutions for Stormwater Utility Assessments; and This Board on June 22, 1993, established Stormwater Utility Areas 1 (Antioch), 2 (Clayton), 3 (Concord), 4 (Danville), 5 (El Cerrito), 6 (Hercules), 7 (Lafayette), 8 (Martinez), 9 (Moraga), 10 (Orinda), 11 (Pinole), 12 (Pittsburg), 13 (Pleasant Hill), 14 (San Pablo), 15 (San Ramon), 16 (Walnut Creek), 17 (Unincorporated County), and on May 9, 2000, established Stormwater Utility area 18 (Oakley). These areas consist of that real property located in the incorporated limits of the cities indicated and the unincorporated Contra Costa County; and On May 26, 2020, this Board set a public hearing to consider adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2020–2021, for Stormwater Utility Areas No. 1 through No. 18; and On June 23, 2020, pursuant to the Board’s Resolution of May 26, 2020, this Board held a hearing to consider the proposed Stormwater Utility Assessments, and at that time, all written and oral objections presented concerning the proposed Stormwater Utility Assessments for Fiscal Year 2020–2021 were considered; and It appears from the affidavits of publication on file with this Board that all notices required to be given for such a hearing have been duly and regularly given and all procedures to be followed have been followed, all in accordance with Sections 11 and 12.8 of the Act and in accordance with the provisions of the Board’s Resolution of May 26, 2020; and This Board has received copies of resolutions approved by a majority of the members of the city councils, town councils, and Board of Supervisors representing the geographic areas of Stormwater Areas No. 1 through No. 18, and said resolutions request that this Board adopt the annual assessment rate denoted herein for their jurisdiction for Fiscal Year 2020–2021. This Board found that the adoption of Stormwater Utility Assessments and adjustments based on equivalent runoff units is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article 5, Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA guidelines on June 13, 1995. A Notice of Exemption was filed on June 14, 1995. This Board FINDS that the proposed assessment rate for each Stormwater Utility Area does not exceed the maximum annual assessment rate established for the area; and This Board, in accordance with Ordinance No. 93-47, ADOPTS by this resolution annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2020–2021 within Stormwater Utility Area No. 1 through No. 18 based on the following rates per ERU for each area. Stormwater Utility Area (SUA) and Assessment Rate per Equivalent Runoff Unit: SUA No. 1, Antioch–$25.00; SUA No. 2, Clayton–$29.00; SUA No. 3, Concord–$35.00; SUA No. 4, Danville–$30.00; SUA No. 5, El Cerrito–$38.00; SUA No. 6, Hercules–$35.00; SUA No. 7, Lafayette–$35.00; SUA No. 8, Martinez–$30.00; SUA No. 9, Moraga–$35.00; SUA No. 10, Orinda–$35.00; SUA No. 11, Pinole–$35.00; SUA No. 12, Pittsburg–$30.00; SUA No. 13, Pleasant Hill–$30.00; SUA No. 14, San Pablo–$45.00; SUA No. 15, San Ramon–$35.00; SUA No. 16, Walnut Creek–$35.00; SUA No. 17, Unincorporated County–$30.00; and SUA No. 18, Oakley–$30.00. This Board hereby DIRECTS the Chief Engineer, Flood Control and Water Conservation District, or designee, to file with the County Assessor and the County Auditor–Controller a list of the parcels subject to the assessment levied for Fiscal Year 2020–2021; and This Board hereby DIRECTS the Clerk of the Board to file with the County Assessor and the County Auditor–Controller a certified copy of this resolution. Contact: Michelle Cordis, (925) 313-2381 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Bob Campbell, County Auditor–Controller, Dorothy Lim, County Auditor-Controller’s Office, Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Ave Brown, Environmental Services, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Courtney Riddle, Contra Costa Clean Water Program, Karin Graves, Contra Costa County Clean Water Program, Michelle Cordis, Flood Control, Andrea Bullock, Contra Costa Clean Water Program, Patrick Melgar, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control RECOMMENDATION(S): Receive attached presentation from the County Clerk-Recorder regarding preparations for the November 3, 2020 Presidential Election. FISCAL IMPACT: Elections cost implications will be dependent on decisions made by the County, legislators, the Secretary of State (SOS), the Governor and the Courts over the next several weeks. There will be increased costs in relation to COVID, but many of them may be reimbursable by CARES, FEMA, and State funding opportunities. Potential funding from CARES or other allocations will flow through the SOS and it is uncertain if these funds will be block grants or reimbursements. We anticipate that they will be reimbursements with some match amount and the County will have to cover the match amount. The SOS has made it clear that funding will be tied to meeting SOS recommendations/directives and not all expenses will be reimbursable. A portion of the costs of the November 2020 election will be billed to participating jurisdictions. Not all costs are reimbursed, as the County is obligated for the cost for County, State, and federal issues. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: Debi Cooper 925-335-7899 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: D.5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Deborah R. Cooper, Clerk-Recorder Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Preparations for the November 2020 General Election CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speakers: Marianna Moore; Dinesh; Lisa Dusbro, Denise Pursche; Alex Zobel, Renee Zeimer; Cora Mitchell. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Presentation: November 2020 Election Preparation MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Presentation Nov 2020 Election Preparation pg 9 corrected Correspondence Received November 3, 2020 Presidential General Election CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER-ELECTIONS DEPARTMENT DEBI COOPER, COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER-REGISTRAR JUNE 23, 2020 What We Know COVID will still be here Every active voter will be sent a Vote-by-Mail (VBM) ballot (apx. 700,000) More than 550,000 voters will vote (over 500,000 by mail) Postage paid returned ballots July direct mailing to non-VBM voters We have technologies, capacity, and experience to handle VBM volume We will have: 45 drop boxes, 36 available 24 hours/day drive-through, drop-off locations in-person voter assistance sites throughout the County (4 days), including Election Day USPS has 349 Collection boxes and 23 local Post Offices throughout the County We will use BallotTrax software for voters to track their ballots 2 What is Unknown How many in-person assistance sites (by choice or mandate) Executive Orders Legislation (AB860 passes, SB423 in amendment process now) Litigation Commitment and availability of voting locations and workers The COVID restrictions in October/November 2020 (could be in mid -surge) Physical social distancing requirements and PPE at voter assistance sites COVID protocols for sanitizing voter assistance sites Risk of social unrest and response procedures Possible funding (Federal CARES Act, State grants/reimbursements) 3 Assumptions Turnout will increase for November VBM returns were 77% in 2012 –Presidential elections always the highest VBM turnout is historically higher than in-person turnout This will be a controversial and highly scrutinized election COVID will still be driving social distancing and PPE requirements We will be counting more nearly 3 million ballot cards Predominantly in-person voter areas may need more in-person locations than Vote-by-Mail areas Sufficient in-person locations and willing workers can be found 4 Planning Challenges Cyber threats and foreign interference Wildfires Public Safety Power Shutoffs COVID, social distancing, and sanitation protocols Social Unrest Unwilling voting locations and poll worker volunteers And possibly to come this fall… Shelter-in-Place 2.0 5 Strategies Outreach Focus: Every voter will receive a ballot –return postage paid! Voting by mail is the easiest way to vote and keep everyone safe If a voter doesn’t receive their ballot within a week of mailing, to contact us early so we can remedy the situation Send or drop off your ballot early The many ways to return a ballot (mail, drop box, drive thru, in-person locations) Expand outreach activities, particularly to historically in-person voters Assistance from community and special interest organizations with outreach to groups that may be challenging to reach 6 #1 Limited Voter Assistance Sites 7 45 Drop Boxes 1 In-person Central Office 29 days 6 In-person Satellite Offices 4 days Minimal COVID Exposure 35 staff Minimal PPE/Cleaning 7 sites Requires new technology no Net cost increase minimal #2 Polling Places 8 45 Drop Boxes 1 In-person Central Office 29 days 3 In-person Satellite Offices 4 days 100 Polling Places 1 day Maximum COVID Exposure 820 staff Maximum PPE/Cleaning 104 sites Requires new technology yes Net cost increase $1,000,000 #3 Maximum Voter Assistance Sites 9 45 Drop Boxes 1 In-person Central Office 29 days 70 In-person Satellite Offices 4 days 100 Polling Places 1 day Maximum COVID Exposure 1,685 staff Maximum PPE/Cleaning 71 sites Requires new technology yes Highest net cost increase $2,500,000 Summary We are confident in our plans and preparations for handling VBM ballots Over 90% of the ballots cast will be VBM Locations for in-person voting will be fluid and dynamic for a time We are making plans for option #2 for in-person voter assistance Election Day only (similar to the March Primary) Enormous health risks Requires significant resources Locations may not be able to be retrofitted for safety Creates $1-2 million shortfall We can switch to option #1 Pending outcome of legislation, court decision Will be required if Shelter in Place 2.0 is ordered Safest for staff, volunteers, and the community Cost neutral The final in-person voting model may end up somewhere between #1-#2 10 11 Stay 6 feet apart Wash your hands Wear a mask Vote by Mail ! Beat COVID-19 this fall: 12 Questions? RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2020/139 to approve the Memorandum of Understanding between In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority and SEIU Local 2015 providing for wages, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for the period of July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: The County share of the negotiated contract increases will be added to the FY 2020/21 IHSS Maintenance of Effort (MOE). The salary increase of $1.00 above minimum wage is expected to begin approximately September 1, 2020. The estimated general fund cost in FY 2020/21 is $1.79 million. Effective January 1, 2022 the state share of non-federal costs decreases from 65% to 35% and the county share of non-federal costs increases from 35% to 65%. In FY 2021/22, the increased county sharing ratio increases the general fund cost by $1.17 million for a total of approximately $3.0 million. BACKGROUND: The Public Authority began bargaining with SEIU, Local 2015 on September 27, 2019. A tentative agreement was reached on May 8, 2020. The resulting Memorandum of Understanding, which is expected to be ratified by SEIU Local 2015 prior to June 23, 2020, is attached. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Kathy Gallagher, Director of Employnment and Human Services, Dianne Dinsmore, Human Resources Director, Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller D.6 To:In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution No. 2020/139 Memorandum of Understanding between IHSS Public Authority and SEIU Local 2015 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > In summary, the significant changes are: Duration of Agreement - Section 19 July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2022 Wages - Section 7 Acknowledges Side Letter to increase base wage from $12.25 to $13.00 per the October 8, 2019 Board of Supervisor agenda Upon Authority adoption, and state approval of rate change, increases base wage for providers $1.00 above California minimum wage Deletes last paragraph in Section 7.2 – Wage Contingency Adds Section 7.3 – Additional Funding Preamble/Definitions – Section 1 Updates Preamble Adds definition for Union, Public Authority, Provider, and Consumer Revises definition for Days Union Recognition – Section 2 Adds Providers who are employed in the Waiver Personal Care Services (WPCS) program to the bargaining unit. No Discrimination – Section 4 Adds marital status, gender identity, and genetic information Union Rights – Section 6 Replaces “Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Authority“ with ”Public Authority“ in Section 6.1 Replaces “SEIU” with “the Union” in Section 6.1 Adds title to Section 6.2 – Bulletin Boards Consumer Rights – Section 8 Deletes first sentence in Section 8.2 – Confidentiality-Right to Privacy Health and Safety – Section 12 Adds title to Section 12.1 - Health and Safety Committee Adds new Section 12.2 – Safe and Healthy Working Environment Adds new Section 12.3 – Personal Protective Equipment - Public Authority will spend up to $10,000 each year for purchasing/restocking of protective equipment Pension Fund Participation – Section 13 Deletes obsolete language in Section 13.1.C(5) Health/Dental Plan – Section 14 Effective 7/1/2020, changes share of monthly plan premium to 5% of the CCHP Plan A-2 monthly premium for each eligible Provider Deletes obsolete language Transportation – Section 17 Deletes obsolete section Clean-up Update “Authority“ with “Public Authority“ throughout Delete “IHSS” when referencing Public Authority throughout Delete “IHSS” when referencing Public Authority throughout Incorporates side letter Renumbers and makes non-substantive edits to the MOU as necessary CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve this MOU will result in the providers continuing to work out of contract and not benefiting from the negotiated wage increases. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2020/139 MOU SEIU 2015 7-1-18 thru 6-30-22 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2020/139 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/23/2020 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2020/139 In the Matter of Approving the Memorandum of Understanding between In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority and SEIU Local 2015. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors acting solely in its capacity as governing board of the In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority RESOLVES THAT: The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority and SEIU Local 2015 providing for wages, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for the period of July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2022 is ADOPTED. A copy of the MOU is attached. Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Kathy Gallagher, Director of Employnment and Human Services, Dianne Dinsmore, Human Resources Director, Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES AUTHORITY AND SEIU LOCAL 2015 JULY 1, 2018 – JUNE 30, 2022 i SEIU LOCAL 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 DEFINITIONS ................................................................... 2 SECTION 2 UNION RECOGNITION .................................................... 2 SECTION 3 MUTUAL RESPECT ......................................................... 2 SECTION 4 NO DISCRIMINATION ...................................................... 2 SECTION 5 PAYROLL ......................................................................... 3 SECTION 6 UNION RIGHTS 6.1 Information ........................................................................ 3 6.2 Bulletin Boards .................................................................. 3 6.3 Dues Deduction ................................................................ 4 6.4 Payroll Deductions and Payover ....................................... 4 SECTION 7 WAGES 7.1 Base Wages ...................................................................... 4 7.2 Wage Contingency ............................................................ 4 7.3 Additional Funding ............................................................ 5 SECTION 8 CONSUMER RIGHTS 8.1 Consumer as Employer ..................................................... 5 8.2 Confidentiality-Right to Privacy ......................................... 5 SECTION 9 REGISTRY ........................................................................ 5 SECTION 10 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 10.1 Definition and Procedural Steps ........................................ 5 10.2 Scope of Arbitration Decisions .......................................... 6 10.3 Time Limits ........................................................................ 7 10.4 Union Notification .............................................................. 7 SECTION 11 ORIENTATION AND TRAINING ...................................... 7 SECTION 12 HEALTH AND SAFETY 12.1 Health and Safety Committee ........................................... 8 12.2 Safe and Healthy Working Environment ........................... 8 12.3 Personal Protective Equipment ......................................... 8 SECTION 13 PENSION FUND PARTICIPATION .................................. 8 ii SECTION 14 HEALTH/DENTAL PLAN ............................................... 10 SECTION 15 OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES, STEWARDS 15.1 Official Representatives .................................................. 11 15.2 Stewards ......................................................................... 11 SECTION 16 NO STRIKE/NO LOCKOUT ........................................... 11 SECTION 17 LABOR-MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE .......................... 12 SECTION 18 SCOPE OF AGREEMENT AND SEPARABILITY OF PROVISIONS 18.1 Scope of Agreement ....................................................... 12 18.2 Separability of Provisions ................................................ 12 SECTION 19 TERM OF AGREEMENT ................................................ 12 SEIU LOCAL 2015 1 of 12 2018-2022 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN IN-HOME SUPPORTIVE SERVICES AUTHORITY AND SEIU LOCAL 2015 This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is entered into pursuant to the authority contained in Division 34 of Board of Supervisors’ Resolution 81/1165 and Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 98-14 and has been jointly prepared by the parties. The Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority (IHSS Public Authority) is the representative in authority-provider relations matters as provided in Board of Supervisors' Resolution 81/1165 and Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 98- 14. The parties have met and conferred in good faith regarding wages and other terms and conditions of employment as defined in Welfare and Institutions Code Section 12301.6 and Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 98-14 for the providers in the unit in which the Union is the recognized representative, have freely exchanged information, opinions and proposals and have endeavored to reach agreement on all matters relating to the authority-provider relations covering such providers. This MOU shall be presented to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, as the governing board of the IHSS Public Authority, as the joint recommendations of the undersigned for salary and other adjustments for the term set forth herein. SECTION 1 - DEFINITIONS SEIU LOCAL 2015 2 of 12 2018-2022 SECTION 1 - DEFINITIONS Days – Calendar days unless otherwise specified. Union – SEIU Local 2015 Public Authority – Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority. Provider – An individual providing In-Home Supportive Services and/or Waiver Personal Care Services (WPCS) to a Consumer. The Individual may provide IHSS hours and/or WPCS hours. Consumer – IHSS Consumer SECTION 2 - UNION RECOGNITION SEIU Local 2015 (Union) is the formally recognized employee organization for the representation unit listed below, and has been certified as such pursuant to Board of Supervisors’ Resolution 81/1165 and Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 98-14. In-Home Supportive Services Provider Unit – Effective July 1, 2019, the bargaining unit includes Providers employed in the Waiver Personal Care Services (WPCS) program. SECTION 3 - MUTUAL RESPECT The Public Authority and the Union agree that all workers and administrators involved in the IHSS program regardless of position, profession, or rank, will treat each other with courtesy, dignity and respect. The foregoing shall also apply in providing services to the public, specifically including Consumers. The Public Authority and the Union will meet, in a timely manner, from time to time, at the request of either party, to discuss issues regarding the application of this section. SECTION 4 - NO DISCRIMINATION There shall be no discrimination because of sex, race, creed, color, national origin, sexual orientation, marital status, gender identity, genetic information or union activities against any Provider by the Public Authority or by anyone employed by the Public Authority; and to the extent prohibited by applicable State and Federal law there shall be no discrimination because of age. SECTION 5 - PAYROLL SEIU LOCAL 2015 3 of 12 2018-2022 There shall be no discrimination against any disabled person seeking to be listed on the IHSS registry solely because of such disability unless that disability prevents the person from performing the essential functions established for the position or from carrying out the duties of the position safely. The parties will encourage Consumers to refrain from discrimination as described in this Article. SECTION 5 - PAYROLL To promote a timely and accurate payroll system, the Public Authority and the Union shall work together to identify causes and solutions to problems resulting in late, lost or inaccurate paychecks and similar issues. When the causes of problems are outside the Public Authority’s direct control, the Public Authority and Union shall work cooperatively to create solutions by bringing the problems to the attention of the responsible agencies (this may include the State’s payroll department, for example). The Public Authority shall provide all home care workers with direct clerical and local access phone numbers at the Public Authority to call for timely answers to payroll questions and resolutions to problems. The Public Authority shall address resolutions to payroll problems in a timely manner. The Public Authority and the Union shall share information on the causes and potential solutions for payroll issues in good faith and in a spirit of cooperative problem solving. SECTION 6 - UNION RIGHTS 6.1 Information. The State provides, on a monthly basis, to the Union a list of all current providers including name, address, telephone number, social security number and hours worked. The Union shall defend, indemnify, save, protect and hold harmless Contra Costa County and the Public Authority and their respective boards, directors, officers and employees from any and all claims, costs and liabilities for any damages and/or injury arising from disclosure to the Union of Provider names, social security numbers, addresses and phone numbers. The County’s and/or the Public Authority’s right to be defended, indemnified, saved, protected and held harmless hereunder shall be unaffected by the concurrent negligence of the County, the Public Authority or any other person. 6.2 Bulletin Boards. The Public Authority will provide a bulletin board in its office for use by the Union provided the communications displayed have to do with official organization business including, but not limited to, times and places of meetings and further provided that the employee organization appropriately posts and removes the information. The Executive Director reserves the right to remove objectionable materials only after notification to and discussion with the Union. SECTION 7- WAGES SEIU LOCAL 2015 4 of 12 2018-2022 6.3 Dues Deduction. Pursuant to Board of Supervisors’ Resolution 81/1165, only a majority representative may have dues deduction and as such the Union has the exclusive privilege of dues deduction for all employees in its unit. 6.4 Payroll Deductions and Payover. The Union shall instruct the State to commence and continue a monthly payroll deduction of Union dues from the regular pay warrants of Providers authorizing such deduction. The Union shall instruct the State of the dollar amount to deduct for Union dues or other authorized Union deductions, including voluntary COPE contributions, specifying the purpose(s) of the deduction. The Provider’s earnings must be sufficient after other legal and required deductions are made to cover the amount of the dues or other deductions that have been approved by the Provider. When a Provider is in a non-pay status for an entire pay period, no withholding will be made to cover the pay period from future earnings. In the case of a Provider who is in a non-pay status during only part of the pay period, and the salary is not sufficient to cover the full withholding, no deduction shall be made. In this connection, all other legal and required deductions (including health care deductions) have priority over Union dues or other authorized Union deductions. SECTION 7- WAGES 7.1 Base Wages. The Base Wage for Providers shall be the State or Federal minimum wage, whichever is highest. • Effective as soon as practicable the Public Authority will establish a wage supplement at an additional one dollar ($1.00) per hour above the Base Wage. The Public Authority will submit the appropriate request to the State to implement the rate which includes the Base Wage and the Wage Supplement within five (5) business days following Union ratification and the Public Authority adoption of this agreement, and timely for any subsequent change in the Base Wage or Wage Supplement. 7.2 Wage Contingency. If, during the term of this Agreement, either state or federal participation levels are reduced or, either the state or federal sharing formula is modified in any manner that would result in an increased cost to the County and/or the Public Authority, wages may be reduced by an amount necessary to keep the total cost to the County and/or the Public Authority the same as such cost existed on the day prior to the effective date of such reduction or modification. The Public Authority shall provide to the Union a detailed written description of any proposed adjustments to be made pursuant to Section 7, Wages, thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of such adjustments. Upon receipt of a written request from the Union to do so, the Public Authority will meet and confer to discuss the impact of the above-described loss of funding, but in no case shall the Public Authority be required to increase its contribution toward wages. SECTION 8 - CONSUMER RIGHTS SEIU LOCAL 2015 5 of 12 2018-2022 7.3 Additional Funding. It is understood that the Union actively and aggressively fights and wins funding for IHSS. Should any extra funding be secured for the IHSS Program, including any change to the State’s position regarding funding payments to the Pension, the Union and the Public Authority will meet within thirty (30) days of its approval to discuss the funding appropriations. SECTION 8 - CONSUMER RIGHTS 8.1 Consumer as Employer. Under State Law and County Ordinance establishing the Public Authority, Consumers have the sole and undisputed right to: 1) hire Providers of their choice; 2) remove Providers from their service at will; 3) determine in advance and under all circumstances who can and cannot enter their home; and 4) supervise the work of Providers providing services to them. 8.2 Confidentiality-Right to Privacy. Union representatives and Providers shall maintain strict standards of confidentiality regarding Consumers and shall not disclose personal information obtained, from whatever source, pertaining to Consumers, unless disclosure is compelled by legal process or otherwise authorized by law. SECTION 9 - REGISTRY In accordance with Welfare and Institutions Code Section 12301.6 and Contra Costa County Ordinance No. 98-14, the Public Authority shall operate a registry for the purpose of assisting Consumers in finding Providers. The parties agree to meet and confer regarding registry matters which impact Provider wages, hours and working conditions including, but not limited to, possible respite and emergency referrals. SECTION 10 - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 10.1 Definition and Procedural Steps. A grievance is any dispute which involves the interpretation or application of any provision of this MOU excluding, however, those provisions of this MOU which specifically provide that the decision of any Public Authority official or Consumer shall be final, the interpretation or application of those provisions not being subject to the grievance procedure. The Union may represent the grievant at any stage of the process. SECTION 10 - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE SEIU LOCAL 2015 6 of 12 2018-2022 Grievances must be filed within thirty (30) days of the incident or occurrence about which the grievant claims to have a grievance and shall be processed in the following manner: Step 1. Any Provider who believes that a provision of this MOU has been misinterpreted or misapplied to his or her detriment shall discuss the complaint with the Public Authority’s Executive Director or such representative as the Director may designate. Step 2. If a grievance is not satisfactorily resolved in Step 1 above, the grievant, or the Union on the grievant’s behalf, may submit the grievance in writing within fifteen (15) days to the Public Authority Director or his/her designated labor relations representative. The grievance shall state which provision of the MOU has been misinterpreted or misapplied, how misapplication or misinterpretation has affected the grievant to the grievant's detriment, and the redress he or she seeks. The Public Authority Director or his designee shall have twenty (20) days in which to respond to the grievance in writing. If the grievant requests a meeting with the IHSS Public Authority Director or his/her designee at this step, such a meeting will be held. Step 3. If a grievance is not satisfactorily resolved in Step 2 above, either party may request in writing within twenty (20) days that the matter be referred to non-binding confidential mediation. Mediation will only occur upon the parties’ mutual agreement. The parties will mutually select a mediator, or if agreement cannot be reached, the parties may request that a mediator be assigned by the State Mediation and Conciliation Service. Anything discussed during the mediation will remain confidential and cannot be used or referenced during any subsequent proceedings (i.e. arbitration, a different grievance, etc.) Step 4. No grievance may be processed under this Section, which has not first been filed and investigated in accordance with Step 1 and 2 above and filed within fifteen (15) days of the written response of the Public Authority Director or the completion of mediation. If the parties are unable to reach a mutually satisfactory accord on any grievance which arises and is presented during the term of this MOU, either the grievant, or the Union on the grievant’s behalf, or the Public Authority may require that the grievance be referred to an impartial arbitrator who shall be designated by mutual agreement between the grievant, or the Union of the grievant’s behalf, and the Public Authority Director. Within twenty-five (25) days of the request for arbitration, the parties shall mutually select an arbitrator who shall render a decision within forty-five (45) days from the date of final submission of the grievance including receipt of the court repor- ter's transcript and post hearing briefs, if any. The fees and expenses of the arbitrator and of the Court Reporter shall be shared equally by the grievant or the Union on the grievant’s behalf, and the Public Authority. Each party, however, shall bear the costs of its own presentation, including preparation and post-hearing briefs, if any. 10.2 Scope of Arbitration Decisions. A. Decisions of arbitrators on matters properly before them shall be final and binding on the parties hereto, to the extent permitted by law. SECTION 11 - ORIENTATION AND TRAINING SEIU LOCAL 2015 7 of 12 2018-2022 B. No arbitrator shall entertain, hear, decide or make recommendations on any dispute unless such dispute involves a position in a unit represented by the Union which has been certified as the recognized employee organization for such unit and such dispute falls within the definition of a grievance as set forth in Subsection 1 above. C. Proposals to add to or change this MOU or to change written agreements supplementary hereto shall not be arbitrable and no proposal to modify, amend, or terminate this MOU, nor any matter or subject arising out of or in connection with such proposals, may be referred to arbitration under this Section. No arbitrator shall have the power to amend or modify this MOU or written agreements supplementary hereto or to establish any new terms or conditions of employment. D. No change in this MOU or interpretations thereof (except interpretations resulting from arbitration proceedings hereunder) will be recognized unless agreed to by the Public Authority and the Union. 10.3 Time Limits. The time limits specified above may be waived by mutual agreement of the parties to the grievance. If the Public Authority fails to meet the time limits specified in Steps 1 through 3 above, the grievance will automatically move to the next step. If a grievant fails to meet the time limits specified in Steps 1 through 5 above, the grievance will be deemed to have been settled and withdrawn. 10.4 Union Notification. An official, with whom a formal grievance is filed by a grievant who is included in a unit represented by the Union, but is not represented by the Union in the grievance, shall give the Union a copy of the formal presentation. SECTION 11 - ORIENTATION AND TRAINING The Public Authority shall seek and give full consideration to the Union’s input for the purpose of developing and implementing training programs for Providers. Training materials and the curriculum will be developed in conjunction with the Advisory Committee, giving full consideration to the Union’s input. The Public Authority shall provide reasonable notice to the Union of group orientations of Providers and Provider training classes. The Public Authority shall provide an opportunity for Union representatives to make presentations at such gatherings. The Public Authority will provide the Union with an annual calendar of New Provider Orientations, indicating the location and designated language for the orientation. Whenever feasible, the Public Authority will give no less than one week’s notice of any changes to orientations. The Union will be given a maximum of thirty (30) minutes at or about the beginning of each orientation to talk to new Providers about the Union. Upon request and with proper notice, the Union may be allowed to use available audio-visual equipment. The Public Authority will provide the Union with a copy of the attendance list including names and telephone numbers after each new Provider orientation. The SECTION 12 - HEALTH AND SAFETY SEIU LOCAL 2015 8 of 12 2018-2022 Public Authority shall have the sole discretion regarding the scheduling of group orientations of Providers and Provider training classes. In the event that the Union is unable to attend a Provider orientation, the Public Authority shall inform Providers that they are represented by the Union and will distribute Union authorization forms and related printed Union information provided by the Union, at orientations of Providers and at Provider training classes. SECTION 12 - HEALTH AND SAFETY 12.1 Health and Safety Committee. The Public Authority staff will meet with Advisory Committee members, social workers, Public Health staff, the Union and other interested parties to explore/study this issue; and, if needed, develop a policy and procedure to address the issue. 12.2 Safe and Healthy Working Environment. Public Authority recognizes the importance of providing a safe and healthy working environment for Providers. No Provider shall be expected to work in any situation which could threaten his/her health and safety. The Provider shall report any unsafe or hazardous conditions to the Public Authority immediately. In an effort to assist, the Public Authority will furnish the Provider with contact information (e.g., resource list) that may be helpful in resolving health and safety concerns. The Public Authority will provide information to Providers regarding Workers’ Compensation, Unemployment and State Disability Insurance (SDI). 12.3 Personal Protective Equipment. Effective July 1, 2020, and in each fiscal year thereafter, the Public Authority will spend up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000.00) each year for the purpose of purchasing and stocking protective supplies for Providers. Such supplies will include protective gloves, masks and antibacterial soap and/or wipes. The Public Authority shall work with the Union in partnership to determine the distribution of the equipment to the Providers. SECTION 13 – PENSION FUND PARTICIPATION A. Coverage: The Public Authority agrees to make contributions on behalf of eligible IHSS providers as defined and covered by this MOU to the Service Employees International Union National Industry Pension Fund, hereinafter referred to as the “Fund” in the amounts specified in Section C below. B. Term: The Public Authority agrees to become and remain a participating Employer in the Fund beginning on July 1, 2001 through the end of the term of this MOU, including any extension thereof, provided that the Public Authority’s contributions are eligible for Federal matching funds. SECTION 13 – PENSION FUND PARTICIPATION SEIU LOCAL 2015 9 of 12 2018-2022 C. Contributions: 1. The Public Authority will contribute to the Fund in the amount of $0.15 for each hour worked by eligible IHSS providers covered by this MOU. 2. Contributions required by this provision shall be paid to the Fund on or before the last day of the month following the period for which contributions are due, or before such other date as the Trustees may hereafter determine. 3. Contributions shall be transmitted together with a remittance report containing such information, in such manner, and on such form as may be required by the Trustees of the Fund or their designee. 4. Contributions for a Provider shall begin once a Provider has worked one thousand (1,000) hours after July 1, 2001. Contributions shall be made for such Provider irrespective of the number of hours worked, in subsequent years. Until contributions are required to be made on behalf of a Provider pursuant to the terms of this provision, the Provider shall not be deemed to be a covered Provider in covered employment within the meaning of the SEIU National Industry Pension Plan. 5. In the event that the Fund imposes any surcharges upon the Public Authority, the Public Authority will contribute the surcharge amount to the Fund. 6. Both parties acknowledge that there may be other ways to provide a retirement benefit for the providers and agree to work cooperatively over the course of this agreement to identify other options that are both economically sound and fulfill the purpose of creating an appropriate retirement benefit. D. Trust Agreement: The Public Authority hereby agrees to be bound by the provisions of the Agreement and Declaration of Trust establishing the Fund, as it may, from time to time, be amended, and by all resolutions and rules adopted by the Trustees pursuant to the powers delegated to them by that Agreement, including collection policies, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged. The Public Authority hereby designates the Employer members of the Fund’s Board of Trustees, or their duly selected successor(s), as its representatives on the Board. E. Cooperation: The Public Authority and Union agree to cooperate with the Trustees of the Fund in distributing Plan booklets, literature and other documents supplied by the Fund Administrator and in obtaining and providing such census and other data as may be required by the Fund’s Administrator or Trustees to enable them to comply with the applicable provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act SECTION 14 - HEALTH/DENTAL PLAN SEIU LOCAL 2015 10 of 12 2018-2022 (ERISA). In any case, there shall be no mailing or other costs incurred by the Public Authority. The parties acknowledge that the provisions of this Section and the participation of the Providers covered by it are subject to approval by the Trustees of the Fund and that the Trustees reserve the right to terminate, at their sole and unreviewable discretion, the participation of the Providers covered by this MOU and to establish the level(s) of benefits to be provided. Termination may be directed by the Trustees for reasons including, but not limited to, failure of the Public Authority to timely pay contributions and expiration of the MOU. In the event the Trust ceases or otherwise terminates coverage of Providers, the Public Authority shall have no other pension obligation to the Providers. The parties further acknowledge that the Trustees’ acceptance for participation in the Fund of the Providers covered by the MOU is limited only to the categories of employment covered by the MOU at the time application for acceptance occurs and the admission of other categories for employment to participate in the Fund will require specific acceptance by the Trustees. SECTION 14 - HEALTH/DENTAL PLAN The following benefit programs shall be offered to Providers (Providers): A. Program. The Public Authority shall offer CCHP Plan A-2 single coverage including single dental coverage to eligible Providers. B. 1. Effective January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2020, the Provider’s CCHP Plan A-2 premium contribution shall be twenty-four dollars and eighty-six cents ($24.86) per month. 2. Beginning July 1, 2020, and continuing thereafter, the Authority will pay ninety-five percent (95%) of the CCHP Plan A-2 monthly premium for each eligible Provider who is enrolled in the CCHP Plan A-2. Each enrolled Provider will pay five percent (5%) of the monthly plan premium. 3. Should CCHP Plan A-2 premiums increase over the course of this agreement the Public Authority shall provide the Union a written notice of the amount of such premium increase at least sixty (60) days before the premium increase takes effect. C. Eligibility for CCHP Plan A-2 Coverage. 1. Initial eligibility shall be achieved when a Provider has two (2) consecutive months of service at an average of forty-five (45) paid hours per month. In order to maintain eligibility, a Provider shall continue to have at least forty- SECTION 15 - OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES, STEWARDS SEIU LOCAL 2015 11 of 12 2018-2022 five (45) paid hours during each successive month. In the first (1st) month in which a Provider is paid for forty-five (45) or more hours, as verified by CMIPS data, the Public Authority will forward the Provider’s name to CCHP by the 15th of the following (2nd) month. CCHP will prepare and mail enrollment packets to the eligible providers by the 25th of that (2nd) month. A Provider must return the completed packet to CCHP accompanied by one (1) month’s premium contribution, by the last business day of the enrollment (3rd) month for health coverage to be effective on the first day of the fifth (5th) month. 2. Any applications received by CCHP after the last business day of the enrollment (3rd) month will not be accepted, but an eligible Provider will be eligible to enroll during the next open enrollment period. D. Pre-Pay. Providers who have achieved eligibility under the terms of subsection 14.C “Eligibility” will pre-pay the provider’s portion of the premium cost so that the effective date of enrollment begins on the first day of the fifth (5th) month. Providers must continue to pre-pay their portion of the health insurance premium in order to continue benefits. E. Implementation. Open Enrollment periods shall be for thirty (30) days and be held in November of each year. F. Providers who are temporarily ineligible for any Public Authority CCHP Plan A-2 premium contribution may purchase, at their own cost coverage under CCHP Plan A-2, in accordance with the procedures set forth by the Contra Costa County Health Plan. SECTION 15 - OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES, STEWARDS 15.1 Official Representatives. The Union shall notify the Public Authority of their Official Representatives and changes in such Representatives. The list shall be sent to the Labor Relations Unit and a copy will be sent to the Executive Director of the Public Authority. 15.2 Stewards. The Union shall notify the Public Authority of the names of their Stewards at the beginning of the contract year and update the names as changes occur. SECTION 16 - NO STRIKE/NO LOCKOUT During the term of this MOU, the Union, its members and representatives, agree not to engage in, authorize, sanction or support any strike, slowdown, stoppage of work, curtailment of production, or refusal to perform customary duties. The Public Authority agrees not to lockout members during the term of this MOU. SECTION 17 – LABOR-MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE SEIU LOCAL 2015 12 of 12 2018-2022 SECTION 17 – LABOR-MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE In order to encourage open communications, promote harmonious relations and resolve matters of mutual concern, the parties agree to create a labor-management committee. The committee will be governed by the following: 1. The committee will meet every month or as mutually agreed to by the parties. 2. The topics for such meetings may include, but are not limited to, mutual respect, payroll problems, paid time off (P.T.O.) and administrative issues associated therewith, health and safety issues and training and education. SECTION 18 - SCOPE OF AGREEMENT AND SEPARABILITY OF PROVISIONS 18.1 Scope of Agreement. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, this MOU fully and completely incorporates the understanding of the parties hereto and constitutes the sole and entire agreement between the parties in any and all matters subject to meet and confer. Neither party shall, during the term of this MOU demand any change herein, provided that nothing herein shall prohibit the parties from changing the terms of this MOU by mutual agreement. 18.2 Separability of Provisions. Should any section, clause or provision of this MOU be declared illegal, unlawful or unenforceable, by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidation of such section, clause or provision shall not invalidate the remaining portions hereof, and such remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect for the duration of this MOU. SECTION 19 - TERM OF AGREEMENT July 1, 2018 and ending June 30, 2022. i SEIU LOCAL 2015 SUBJECT INDEX Additional Funding ............................................................................................. 5 Bulletin Boards ................................................................................................... 3 Base Wages ...................................................................................................... 4 Confidentiality-Right to Privacy .......................................................................... 5 Consumer as Employer ..................................................................................... 5 Consumer Rights ............................................................................................... 5 Definition and Procedural Steps (Grievance Procedure) ................................... 5 Definitions .......................................................................................................... 2 Dues Deduction ................................................................................................. 4 Grievance Procedure ......................................................................................... 5 Health and Safety .............................................................................................. 8 Health and Safety Committee ............................................................................ 8 Health/Dental Plan ........................................................................................... 10 Information (Union Rights) ................................................................................. 3 Labor-Management Committee ....................................................................... 12 Mutual Respect .................................................................................................. 2 No Discrimination ............................................................................................... 2 No Strike/No Lockout ....................................................................................... 11 Official Representatives ................................................................................... 11 Orientation and Training .................................................................................... 7 Payroll ................................................................................................................ 3 Payroll Deductions and Payover ........................................................................ 4 Pension Fund Participation ................................................................................ 8 Personal Protective Equipment .......................................................................... 8 Registry .............................................................................................................. 5 Safe and Healthy Working Environment ............................................................ 8 Scope of Agreement ........................................................................................ 12 Scope of Arbitration Decisions ........................................................................... 6 Separability of Provisions ................................................................................. 12 Stewards .......................................................................................................... 11 Term of Agreement .......................................................................................... 12 Time Limits (Grievance Procedure) ................................................................... 7 ii Union Notification ............................................................................................... 7 Union Recognition .............................................................................................. 2 Union Rights ...................................................................................................... 3 Wage Contingency ............................................................................................. 4 Wages ................................................................................................................ 4 RECOMMENDATION(S): PRESENTATION by the Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition and other partners on equity issues related to COVID-19. FISCAL IMPACT: No direct fiscal impact. This is an information presentation. BACKGROUND: Attached is the June 9, 2020, letter from the Contra Costa Budget Coalition to the Board of Supervisors on COVID-19 equity and other presentation materials provided by the Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition and PolicyLink. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller D.7 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Presentation by the Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition on Equity Issues Related to COVID-19 CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speakers: Melvin Willis, ACCE; Lyn ,; Doug Leach, Multi-Faith Action Coalition; Debbie Toth, Choice in Aging; AGENDA ATTACHMENTS CCC BJC Ltr on Covid Equity (6/9/2020 BAEA State of Equity in Contra Costa County Budget Justice Equity Presentation MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Correspondence Received Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition www.budgetjusticecc.org 415.828.9977 1 June 9, 2020 Supervisor Candace Anderson Supervisor Diane Burgis Supervisor John Gioia Supervisor Federal Glover Supervisor Karen Mitchoff County Administrator David Twa Health Services Director Anna Roth Employment and Human Services Director Kathy Gallagher Dear Supervisors, Administrator Twa, and Directors Roth and Gallagher: The extraordinary times we live in call on all of us to rise to the occasion, gather our communities, and initiate, join and lead efforts to address the urgent needs of Contra Costa residents. These needs include in particular the glaring issues of racism, economic inequality, police violence, and the disproportionate health and economic impacts of Covid-19 on low-income residents and communities of color in our county. The Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition (BJC) believes this deep and complex web of crises and conditions presents unique opportunities to take concrete actions to address systemic issues that affect the health and well-being of all people who live in Contra Costa. We are writing to focus your attention on the following aspects of the current situation, along with specific requests and recommendation in each area: 1. Incorporate racial justice and equity issues more deeply into the County’s COVID-19 response by ensuring that members of the most impacted sectors of our community are engaged in programming and decision-making. 2. Create meaningful and inclusive community engagement opportunities in the county’s FY 20-21 budget development process. 3. Explore county actions to reform policing practices which align with anti-racism principles recently announced by Governor Newsom. 4. Eliminate the use of our public monies on programs which provide military equipment to law enforcement, even if such equipment is provided at ‘no cost’. 5. Explore ways to redirect funding into community health, education, employment and housing programs. COVID-19 and Racial Justice The death and economic devastation brought on by the COVID-19 crisis disproportionately affect low- income people and communities of color, specifically members of the Black and Latinx communities. The prospects of an ongoing health crisis, compounded by what is shaping up to be the worst recession since the Great Depression, means that these harms to our community will persist beyond the shelter- Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition www.budgetjusticecc.org 415.828.9977 2 in-place period. This will undoubtedly leave those who were already in economically and socially- depressed situations, even more so. While challenging, this moment in time also presents an opportunity to critically examine our systems, understand how and why the most vulnerable residents bear the biggest burdens, and to take steps to redress systemic inequities. We call on the Board to engage with the Racial Justice Coalition in forming a Racial Justice Task Force to pull together community leaders from communities of color, in particular those from the Black community, who are disproportionately impacted by Covid-19, with County leaders and other stakeholders, to address racial justice issues in our response to the COVID-19 crisis. The City of San Jose recently formed such a Task Force that may serve as a model. This new task force would complement the work of the Board of Supervisor’s current COVID-19 Ad Hoc Committee that is addressing re-opening issues. We also recognize that the Social Needs Task Force of the Health Services Department and a number of community-based organizations and coalitions are also addressing some of these issues, and would recommend that these efforts be cross-informed. Community Engagement in Budget Process Fundamental to our democracy as a government “of the people, by the people and for the people” is the right of the people to have opportunities for meaningful engagement and input on budget priorities and decisions. Contra Costa County’s mission is to provide “public services which improve the quality of life of our residents and the economic viability of our businesses.” The quality of life of our residents is currently under great duress, and county budgets reflect a community’s values and priorities. It is imperative that Contra Costa residents have a meaningful voice in the formation of the upcoming county budget. We recognize that the severe fiscal challenges brought on by the Covid-19 crisis and the subsequent economic downturn has increased service demands even as revenue sources begin to shrink, which will likely lead to difficult budget decisions. We understand that shelter-in-place requirements presents unique challenges in facilitating community engagement. At this moment in time, we believe it is more important than ever that the Board, County Administrator and key Department Directors provide ongoing opportunities for meaningful community engagement as you develop budget plans for coming fiscal year. We just heard from Mr. Twa that the Budget Justice Coalition’s previously scheduled equity presentation is now scheduled for June 23 – thanks very much for rescheduling. Our presentation will be updated to reflect the economic and community impacts of COVID-19 and the shelter-in-place order. Following our formal presentation on June 23, we request that the Board schedule significant time for the ensuing discussion and community input. In addition, we request that the following two additional engagement opportunities take place prior to the upcoming Board budget hearing, which we understand may happen in August. Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition www.budgetjusticecc.org 415.828.9977 3 1. Reschedule the Health Services and EHSD Town Hall. We had scheduled this year’s health and social services budget town hall with Anna Roth and Kathy Gallagher for late February, but it was canceled due to the emerging public health crisis. We would like to reschedule and (virtually) hold this event as soon as possible, will follow up with Directors Roth and Gallagher, and ask for your support in arranging this. 2. Resume meetings of the Board’s Family and Human Services Committee immediately. The FHS Committee provides an important forum for departmental transparency and for stakeholder and community input on critical social service and safety net needs. As you may know, numerous organizations and individuals in Contra Costa are working hard every day to meet the growing health and social service needs of our community’s residents during this difficult time. Budget Justice Coalition members are involved in many of these efforts, such as: • A group of East Bay Foundations sponsored a Sanford Institute survey of nonprofits in Alameda and Contra Costa; summary of findings is available here. • First Five Contra Costa is conducting a survey on the needs of local children and families. • The Human Services Alliance is conducting a survey of service providers in Contra Costa to learn more about the challenges, innovations, and needs of the service sector in the current environment. • Multi-Faith Action Coalition is gathering stories and data about local tenants’ ability to pay rent, health and economic impacts on essential workers, and other factors affecting the economic well-being of Contra Costa residents. We appreciate the County’s own data gathering efforts, such as through the Health Department’s Social Needs Task Force and the Marginalized Communities Task Force. We plan to incorporate key data from these new efforts into our June 23 presentation, with the goal of providing useful policy and budget insights and recommendations. Criminal Justice and Policing Practices One consequence of the murder of George Floyd has been a dramatically enhanced awareness nationwide of the depths of racism in our society, and the need to reform police practices. We are beginning to see real movement on these issues in state and local governments. There are many resources and recommendations on specific steps local governments can take to address deeply engrained, racist patterns, cultures and practices that oppress and harm people of color in our country. We urge the County to actively explore and develop specific policies and budgetary practices to reduce the negative impacts on community members of county law enforcement as well as other County departments. For example: • The Obama Foundation has numerous resources and guidance on steps local governments can take on its Anguish and Action page. For example, My Brother’s Keeper Alliance asks local leaders to commit to the following actions: • REVIEW police use of force policies, and update data on disproportionate minority contact. Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition www.budgetjusticecc.org 415.828.9977 4 • ENGAGE local communities by including a diverse range of input, experiences, and stories in your review. • REPORT review findings to the community and seek feedback. • REFORM police use of force policies • Campaign Zero’s #8CANTWAIT project lays out eight specific policing policies that have been demonstrated to reduce police violence by 72%. • Research and implement transformative policies such as transparency in police practices, bail reform, and prosecutorial accountability. We look forward to working with the Board and County leaders on these important issues, and close with these final thoughts: The dogmas of the quiet past, are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled high with difficulty, and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country. Fellow-citizens, we cannot escape history. We . . . will be remembered in spite of ourselves. No personal significance, or insignificance, can spare one or another of us. The fiery trial through which we pass, will light us down, in honor or dishonor, to the latest generation. - Abraham Lincoln’s Annual Message to Congress, December 1, 1862 Thank you for your attention to our requests. We look forward to your response soon. Dan Geiger Coordinator Budget Justice Coalition On behalf of the Steering Committee: • Fran Biderman, First Five Contra Costa, Family Economic Security Partnership (FESP), Budget Justice Coalition Steering Committee • Stacie Hinton, AFSCME Local 2700, Budget Justice Coalition Steering Committee • Cheryl Sudduth, West County Wastewater, (Vice-President, Board of Directors), Contra Costa Racial Justice Oversight Body (RJOB), Contra Costa Racial Justice Coalition (CCRJC-Steering Committee), Contra Costa Immigration Rights Alliance (CCIRA), ACLU (Board), BWOPA (Lifetime Member, Political Action Advisory Board), Budget Justice Coalition Steering Committee, NAACP • Mariana Moore, Ensuring Opportunity Campaign, Budget Justice Coalition Project Manager And Budget Justice Coalition Organizational Members AFSCME Local 2700 Asian Pacific Environmental Network Choice in Aging Contra Costa Budget Justice Coalition www.budgetjusticecc.org 415.828.9977 5 Community Clinic Consortium of Contra Costa & Solano Contra Costa Labor Council Contra Costa Office of Education Contra Costa Racial Justice Coalition East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy Ensuring Opportunity Campaign First 5 Contra Costa/Family Economic Security Partnership (FESP) Greater Richmond Interfaith Program Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano Human Services Alliance of Contra Costa IFPTE Local 21 League of Women Voters Diablo Valley Local Initiatives Support Corporation Meals on Wheels Senior Outreach Multi-Faith Action Coalition Planned Parenthood of Northern California Richmond Community Foundation Rubicon Programs Safe Return SEIU Local 1021 And many residents of Contra Costa June 23, 2020 Presentation to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors by Sarah Treuhaft, Managing Director, PolicyLink The State of Equity in Contra Costa County OVERVIEWWhat is Equity? •Equity is just and fair inclusion into a society in which all can participate, prosper, and reach their full potential. •Achieving equity requires dismantling structural racism and systemic barriers and proactively working to ensure that each individual’s circumstances provides them with the optimal opportunity to thrive. OVERVIEWWhat Is the Bay Area Equity Atlas? A comprehensive data support system to track the state of equity across the region and equip community leaders with data to inform solutions for inclusive prosperity. •21 Equity Metrics for 272 Geographies •Policy Solutions •Research/Analysis •Training •Data Support for Campaigns HOW IS CONTRA COSTA DOING? OVERVIEWHow is Contra Costa Doing? •Rapidly diversifying population •Overall improvements over past decade, but an increase in vulnerable populations & risks •Economic insecurity & significant racial inequities •The pandemic is exacerbating underlying vulnerabilities & racial inequities HEALTH INEQUITIESLatinx Residents Disproportionately Infected Source: Contra Costa Health Services BASIC FAMILY NEEDS45% of Black and 57% of Latinx Households Financially Precarious Before the Pandemic Source: Insight Center Basic Needs Budget •1 adult: $44,112 •1 adult, 1 preschooler: $85,602 •2 adults, 1 school-aged child, 1 preschooler: $102,877 UNEQUAL HEALTH RISKSContra Costa’s Latinx, Black, and Immigrant Residents Disproportionately Work in Frontline Industries Source: Bay Area Equity Atlas Profile of Frontline Workers in the Bay Area UNEQUAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS 22% 24% 27% 28% White Latinx Asian Black Sources: CA Employment Development Department; California Policy Lab; National Equity Atlas Race, Risk, and the Coronavirus Economy Bay Area Workers of Color Hit Harder by Coronavirus Shock 14.5%Unemployment rate, Contra Costa CountyApril 2020 (vs. 3.1% Feb 2020) UI Claims as a Share of the Labor Force, California, Mar 15-May 30, 2020 ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF EQUITYEquity Is A Moral and Economic Imperative Estimated benefits of equity in Contra Costa County: Source: Bay Area Equity Atlas Economic gains: Racial equity in income; Economic gains: Eliminate rent burden; New Americans in Contra Costa County ADVANCING EQUITYA Growing Movement for Equity in Local Government •Since Seattle established the first citywide equity initiative in 2015 hundreds of city and county governments have launched dedicated equity initiatives •They are adopting racial equity impact assessments, establishing Offices of Equity, hiring Chief Equity Officers, and shifting policies and resources to advance racial equity Members of the Government Alliance on Race and Equity BUDGET JUSTICEBudgets Are Crucial Equity Tools “This moment calls for extraordinary investments in health, housing, education, jobs, and social services, not austerity measures or investments that diminish our communities rather than strengthen them. Decision makers can create more opportunity and safety for Black people and all people by prioritizing these investments and targeting them to the most vulnerable communities. Budget justice is essential for racial justice, and for finally creating a society in which Black Lives Matter.” -Marc Philpart and Chione L. Flegal, PolicyLink Explore more data about our region on the Bay Area Equity Atlas at: http://bayareaequityatlas.org Questions? Contact us at: sarah@policylink.org Thank you! Equity Presentation Conclusion and Recommendations JUNE 23, 2020 DAN GEIGER CONTRA COSTA BUDGET JUSTICE COALITION THE BUDGET IS A MORAL DOCUMENT “Despite its complexity the budget is essentially a moral document—the specific expression of the values of the nation.” From: “The Federal Budget as a Moral Document: A Letter from Religious Leaders,” by sixty faith leaders from around the United States in a letter to President George W. Bush, 2005 Systemic Problems Require Systemic Solutions We support a community-based process to develop an Office of Racial Justice and Social Equity to lead efforts to incorporate equity and justice issues across the board –in budgeting, department goals, operations, etc. Systemic Problems Require Systemic Solutions •Adopt explicit Values/Priorities based budgeting principles, practices, and methodologies •Examine well-established models What Can Be Done Now on Process •Provide meaningful opportunities for community input on FY 20-21 budget priorities prior to August budget hearing •Health Services/EHSD Budget Town Halls •Simplify budget information for the lay public, including budget adjustment reports •Utilize Family and Human Services Committee for opportunities for community input What Can Be Done Now to Address Social Justice •Incorporate racial justice and equity analysis in FY 20-21 budget priorities and development •Significantly increase the percentage of the budget for health and safety net services Members 350 Contra Costa ACCE AFSCME Local 2700 Asian Pacific Environmental Network Choice in Aging Community Clinic Consortium of Contra Costa & Solano Contra Costa Labor Council Contra Costa Racial Justice Coalition East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy Ensuring Opportunity Campaign First 5 Contra Costa/Family Economic Security Partnership (FESP) Greater Richmond Interfaith Program Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano Health Care for All –Contra Costa Human Services Alliance of Contra Costa IFPTE Local 21 League of Women Voters Diablo Valley Local Initiatives Support Corporation Meals on Wheels Senior Outreach Multi-Faith Action Coalition Planned Parenthood of Northern California Richmond Community Foundation Rubicon Programs Safe Return SEIU Local 1021 And many residents of Contra Costa THANK YOU ! RECOMMENDATION(S): CONSIDER update on COVID 19; and PROVIDE direction to staff. Health Department - Anna Roth, Director and Dr. Farnitano, Health Officer1. FISCAL IMPACT: Administrative reports with no specific fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department has established a website dedicated to COVID-19, including daily updates. The site is located at: https://www.coronavirus.cchealth.org/ APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: David Twa I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: D.8 To:Board of Supervisors From: Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Update on COVID-19 CLERK'S ADDENDUM Dr. Anna Roth, Health Services Director, reports that cases are continuing to rise in California and nation wide. California is now at 178,000 cases, with 5,500 fatalities. San Joaquin, Solano and Contra Costa counties are seeing an increase in hospitalizations. Contra Costa has 2454 cases, 62 deaths, 35 people are hospitalized, 4 not from Contra Costa, with 7 of our residents in another county's hospital. Over the last week there have been 343 new cases, clearing indicating wide community spread. Our 7 day percent positive is remaining around 3 percent. Closely monitoring the 6 key indicators set by the Bay Area Health Officers to guide reopening measures. There is a slow rise in all indicators. Graphs and statistics are available on the dashboard at cchealth.org. Observing basic protective measures is vital to a reopening. Wash your hands, social distance, wear a mask and stay home if you are sick. Health Services very much wants everyone to get tested. Especially any who work or live with the vulnerable populations. She urges employers to review their sick leave policies to enable those who are ill to stay home. There are two epicenters: assisted living facilities and congregate living facilities. The County has tested over 62,000 people, 183 tests per 100,000 people. We are almost to the goal of 200 tests per 100,000 people. Last week a testing site was opened in the Monument Corridor in Concord, and next week another site will open in Richmond. County testing sites are using the less invasive, more comfortable self-swab test. The county is working with all area providers to ramp up there testing. There is no waiting! Please call 1-844-421-0804 to schedule a test today. The hiring process is complete and Health Services is on-boarding 60 new staff members for contact tracing, to add to the 86 already in place. Ten more will be added each week. Dr. Sara Levin, Internal Medicine, Deputy Health Officer, informed the Board that it was recognized early in the pandemic that a coordinated response was necessary to control the spread of the virus in congregate care facilities, particularly in the highest risk population, the elderly. The public-private partnership has performed well. The county performed site visits with all senior care facilities with more than 8 or more beds. The priority has been in facilities for long term care for the elderly. Health Services is not a regulatory body for these facilities. They reached out to each site to help with training and ppe supplies for infection control and prevention. The April 13th health order required that visitation be limited, all staff and visitors be masked, and a log kept of all persons on site for residential care facilities. The May 29th Health order mandated that all long-term care facility personnel and residents be tested. 99 percent of deaths were among people over 50 years of age: 66 % of deaths were over 80; 15% were between 70 -80; 18% were 50-70 and 1% were under 50. Two-thirds were residents of senior care facilities. Patients are being transferred to hospital when appropriate. The reopening timeline is subject to adjustment according to indicators, in particular hospitalization numbers and capacity of hospitals. The health officers are reconciling the state and local guidelines, with some adjustments On July 1st we intend to open hotels for tourism and individual travel; indoor museums, limited indoor entertainment such as arcades, billiards, bowling alleys, gyms and fitness centers and personal training; bars, with or without food; and personal services that don’t involve the face (massage, tattoos, body waxing, nail salons); and indoor dining On July 15th we intend to open Personal service that do involve the face; movie theaters, and card rooms The Contra Costa Education Department worked with the health department, they have posted to their website a reopening guideline. Reopening plans are subject to change if the indicators of the Bay Area Health Officers reflect it is not yet time because spread and hospitalizations have increased. To keep up to date on information, please visit the dashboard at cchealth.org RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a Joint Exercise Powers Agreement (Agreement) between Contra Costa County and the City of Dublin for the design and construction of the Camino Tassajara/Tassajara Road Realignment Project (Project No. 0662-6R4129), San Ramon area. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Local, Regional, and Sub-Regional Funds: Tri-valley Transportation Authority Funds 46.7%, SCC Dougherty Valley 28.6%, SCC Sub-Regional 24.7%. BACKGROUND: The Camino Tassajara/Tassajara Road Realignment Project is a joint project with the City of Dublin that includes roadway re-alignment and roadway widening on approximately 4,200 feet of Camino Tassajara/Tassajara Road between Windemere Parkway in Contra Costa County to Palisades Drive/Kylemore Circle in the City of Dublin. The County Public Works Department has been coordinating with the City of Dublin on this project since 2011 to determine the ultimate alignment of the roadway and more recently to finalize project scope and costs. Realignment of APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Nancy Wein, 925.313.2275 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 1 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement between Contra Costa County and the City of Dublin for the Camino Tassajara/Tassajara Road Realignment Project., San Ramon area. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) the roadway will improve safety for motorists and accessibility for bicyclists and pedestrians along Camino Tassajara. The project will improve sight distance by removing the S-curve and connectivity between Alameda and County Costa Counties. Widening of the roadway from two-lanes to four lanes will also increase capacity to accommodate projected future traffic volumes, consistent with the County General Plan. The additional pavement width will provide Class II bicycle lanes in accordance with the 2018 Contra Costa Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. An additional separated shared use path will bridge the City’s trail network to the existing sidewalk and trails along Windemere Parkway and the 2019 constructed bike lanes on Camino Tassajara. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the parties’ financial and project responsibilities pertaining to design, environmental clearance, right of way acquisition and construction of the roadway improvements. With this Agreement, the design phase for a new roadway alignment can be started with the intent to get the project “shovel ready”. The City of Dublin will contribute $3.1 million for this work. The City will identify funds for construction before the parties move that phase of the Project. The JEPA is structured to allow design activities, including environmental clearance and right of activities to commence, with the construction phase only to begin by written agreement of both parties’ authorized representatives. The total project cost is approximately $30 million with the County’s share estimated at $17.5 million. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: A negative action would delay the design of this safety improvement project. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Written correspondence in opposition was received from Richard Fischer, a co-founder of the Tassajara Valley Preservation Association (attached). AGENDA ATTACHMENTS JEPA MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Correspondence Received 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have each executed this AGREEMENT as of the EFFECTIVE DATE. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: CITY OF DUBLIN: By:________________________________ By:________________________________ Brian M. Balbas Public Works Director Linda Smith City Manager APPROVED AS TO FORM: Sharon L. Anderson, County Counsel APPROVED AS TO FORM: By:________________________________ By:________________________________ Deputy County Counsel City Attorney FIGURE 1 CAMINO TASSAJARA/TASSAJARA ROAD REALIGNMENT PROJECT From: Richard Fischer < Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:32 AM To: Jami Napier <Jami.Napier@cob.cccounty.us > Cc: Supervisor Candace Andersen <SupervisorAndersen@bos.cccounty.us> Subject: FW: Joint Exercise Powers Agreement Dear Ms. Napier, As I explained in this e -mail below to Supervisor Anderson, my unfamiliarity with the technology for commenting on consent items prevented me from voicing m y objections to the Joint Exercise Powers Agreement. I am respectively requesting that my comments to Supervisor Anderson be made part of the Supervisors’ meeting today and be circulated to each Supervisor. Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. Kind regards, Richard Fischer From: Richard Fischer Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2020 10:25 AM To: 'supervisorandersen@bos.cccounty.us' Cc: 'Jami Napier'; 'Jim Blickenstaff'; 'Donna Gerber'; 'logue.family1111@gmail.com'; 'Dick Schneider' Subject: Joint Exercise Powers Agreement Dear Supervisor Anderson, I was attempting to call in on the consent items on today’s meeting, but did not realize that the video of the meeting was tape delayed from the actual discussion and I missed my chance to speak on Consent item C 1, the widening of Tassajara Road. I realize I am in District 3, but I believe you have a special fondness for the Tassajara Valley. I realize that consent was given on this item, but did want to state my objections for the next stage of approval of the widening of Tassajara Road. My name is Richard Fischer and a co -founder of the Tassajara Valley Preservation Association and organization devoted to protecting the county’s urban limit line and preserving the rural Tassajara Valley where I have lived for the past 43 years. The County should not approve this Joint Exercise Powers Agreement between the City of Dublin and the County to convert portions of Tassajara Road into a 4 lane arterial. 1. This section of the county is outside of the coun ty’s urban limit line. There is no need to construct the beginning of a 4 lane arterial road between Interstate 580 and Interstate 680 for the convenience of Northbound Alameda County commuters to shortcut the congested 580 to northbound 680 turnoff and bring traffic into a rural area 2. I fail to see how this project is consistent with the county’s General Plan. The county’s own Department of Conservation and Development’s finding in 2016 stated that there is enough buildable land within the existing ULL to support population and job growth through 2036. Thus where is this “growth” in the Tassajara Valley, which is outside the Ull, originating from? 3. Any additional safety for bicycle riders will be offset by increased traffic flowing at a higher speed. Riders use Tassajara Road because it is rural. Since this area is undeveloped, pedestrian traffic is almost non-existent. 4. If the county’s actual purpose for this project is to open up Tassajara Valley for land developers, and using $17 million of taxpayer sourced funds to pay for the project, just state this as the purpose. Let’s not undermine one of the best tools the County has ever had in preventing sprawl and destruction of open space --the Urban Limit Line --with an un-necessary and growth inducing road widening. It would not only be a misuse of taxpayer money, it would be an abuse of taxpayer money. Let us keep Tassajara Valley rural and outside the ULL. In the future, the instructions on the county’s web site might in clude a notation to ignore the video feed and rely strictly on the audio phone feed to make comments to the board. Again, thank you for your interest in this matter and I hope further review of this project will result in postponement of road widening improvements, at least until the County’s Department of Conservation and Development certifies that the ULL needs to be expanded. Sincerely, Richard L. Fischer Tassajaravalleypa.rf@gmail.com 925-200-4574 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2020/159 approving the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for minor subdivision MS18-00007, for a project being developed by The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement is required by Condition of Approval No. 36. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Randolf Sanders (925)313-2111 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Deborah Preciado - Engineering Services, Michelle Mancuso- Watershed Program, Flood Control, The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust C. 2 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for minor subdivision MS18-00007, Alamo area. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The agreement will not be recorded and the Contra Costa County may not be in full compliance with its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and Stormwater Management Discharge Control Ordinance. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2020/159 Stormwater Management Facilities Operation & Maintenance Agreement and Right of Entry MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2020/159 Recorded at the request of:Clerk of the Board Return To:Public Works Dept- Simone Saleh THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/23/2020 by the following vote: AYE:John Gioia, District I SupervisorCandace Andersen, District II SupervisorDiane Burgis, District III SupervisorKaren Mitchoff, District IV SupervisorFederal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2020/159 IN THE MATTER OF approving the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement for minor subdivision MS18-00007 (APN 193-111-016), Alamo area. (District II) WHEREAS the Public Works Director has recommended that he be authorized to execute the Stormwater Management Facilities Operation and Agreement with The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust, as required by the Conditions of Approval for minor subdivision MS18-00007. This agreement would ensure the operation and maintenance of the stormwater facilities in accordance with the approved Stormwater Control Plan and approved Operation and Maintenance Plan for minor subdivision MS18-00007, which is located at 162 East Lane in the Alamo area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. Contact: Randolf Sanders (925)313-2111 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Deborah Preciado - Engineering Services, Michelle Mancuso- Watershed Program, Flood Control, The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2020/160 approving the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS18-00007, for a project being developed by The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department has reviewed the conditions of approval for minor subdivision MS18-00007 and has determined that all conditions of approval for Parcel Map approval have been satisfied. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Parcel Map and the Subdivision Agreement will not be approved and recorded. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Randolf Sanders (925)313-2111 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Deborah Preciado - Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Record, Cinda Tovar- Design & Construction, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Michael Mann- Finance, Dominique Vogelpohl, DCD, The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust, T-04/23/2021 C. 3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS18-00007, Alamo area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2020/160 Parcel Map Subdivision Agreement Tax Letter MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2020/160 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/23/2020 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2020/160 IN THE MATTER OF approving the Parcel Map and Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS18-00007, for project being developed by The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District II) WHERE AS, the following documents were presented for board approval this date: I. Map The Parcel Map of minor subdivision MS18-00007, property located in the Alamo area, Supervisorial District II, said map having been certified by the proper officials. II. Subdivision Agreeement A subdivision agreement with The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust, principal, whereby said principal agrees to complete all improvements as required in said subdivision agreement within 2 year(s) from the date of said agreement. Accompanying said subdivision agreement is security guaranteeing completion of said improvements as follows: A. Cash Bond Performance Amount: $83,000.00 Labor & Materials Amount: $41,500.00 Auditor’s Deposit Permit No. DP809198 Date: June 5, 2020 Submitted by: The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust B. Tax Letter Letter from the County Tax Collector stating that there are no unpaid County taxes heretofore levied on the property included in said map and that the 2019-2020 tax lien has been paid in full and the 2020-2021 tax lien, which became a lien on the first day of January 2020, is estimated to be $26,130.00, with security guaranteeing payment of said tax lien as follows: Tax Surety Auditor’s Deposit Number: DP803105 Date: February 7, 2020 Amount: $26,130.00 Submitted by/Principal: The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That said subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is DETERMINED to be consistent with the County's general and specific plans. 1. That said Parcel Map is APPROVED. 2. That said Parcel Map is APPROVED. 2. That said subdivision agreement is also APPROVED.3. Contact: Randolf Sanders (925)313-2111 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Larry Gossett- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Deborah Preciado - Engineering Services, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Record, Cinda Tovar- Design & Construction, Chris Hallford -Mapping , Michael Mann- Finance, Dominique Vogelpohl, DCD, The Sherwood Family Revocable Trust, T-04/23/2021 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2020/164 ratifying the prior decision of the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of eastbound lanes of Wayne Drive, between Buskirk Avenue and Oak Road, on June 20, 2020 from 6:00 AM through 1:00 PM, for the purpose of hoisting chillers to a rooftop, Walnut Creek area. (District IV) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Applicant shall follow guidelines set forth by the Public Works Department. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Applicant will not have Board approval for completed road closure. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Bob Hendry (925)374-2136 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 4 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Ratify the prior decision to close a portion of eastbound lanes of Wayne Drive, on June 20, 2020, Walnut Creek area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2020/164 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2020/164 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/23/2020 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2020/164 IN THE MATTER OF ratifying the prior decision of the Public Works Director, or designee, to fully close a portion of eastbound lanes of Wayne Drive, between Buskirk Avenue and Oak Road, on June 20, 2020 from 6:00 AM through 1:00 PM, for the purpose of hoisting chillers to a rooftop, Walnut Creek area. (District IV) RC20-1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED IT IS BY THE BOARD RESOLVED that permission is granted to Maxim Crane Works to fully close eastbound lanes of Wayne Drive, except for emergency traffic, on June 20, 2020 for the period of 6:00 AM through 1:00 PM, subject to the following conditions: 1. Traffic will be detoured via neighboring streets per traffic control plan reviewed by Public Works.. 2. All signing to be in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. 3. Maxim Crane Works shall comply with the requirements of the Ordinance Code of Contra Costa County. 4. Provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00 for Comprehensive General Public Liability which names the County as an additional insured prior to permit issuance. 5. Obtain approval for the closure from the Sheriff’s Department, the California Highway Patrol and the Fire District. Contact: Bob Hendry (925)374-2136 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2020/167 approving and authorizing the Chief Engineer, Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District), or designee, to impose the annual Drainage Area Benefit Assessments (DABAs) for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 for Drainage Areas 67A, 75A, 76A, 520, 910, 1010, and 1010A, in the Walnut Creek, San Ramon, Alamo, Oakley, and Danville areas. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed annual DABAs will provide approximately $362,000 in funding for drainage maintenance activities in Drainage Areas 67A, 75A, 76A, 520, 910, 1010, and 1010A. (100% Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Funds) APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Michelle Cordis, (925) 313-2381 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator's Office, Robin Cantu, County Assessor’s Office, Bob Campbell, County Auditor–Controller, Dorothy Lim, County Auditor-Controller’s Office, Brice Bins, County Treasurer-Tax Collector's Office, Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Michelle Cordis, Flood Control, Patrick Melgar, Flood Control, Simone Saleh, Engineering Services, Catherine Windham, Flood Control C. 5 To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Annual Drainage Area Benefit Assessments For Fiscal Year 2020-2021. Project No. 7505-6F8167, CP# 99-54 BACKGROUND: DABA areas are those in which all parcels within each drainage area boundary pay assessments for flood control infrastructure maintenance and repair. Flood control maintenance activities include complaint investigation, facility inspections, ditch and basin cleaning, maintaining right-of-way access, and other general routine drainage maintenance activities. Special drainage maintenance activities, such as bank repairs, are also funded by the assessments. The benefit assessments collected are used only for administration, maintenance, and operation of the Flood Control facilities, within the FC District right-of-way limits. The annual benefit assessment amount for each Impervious Area Unit (IAU [one IAU equals 1,000 ft2]) is the quotient of the total annual maintenance cost divided by the total IAU’s in the drainage area. The annual benefit assessment for each lot is the product of the number of IAU’s assigned to each lot times the annual benefit assessment per IAU. The annual benefit assessment is adjusted periodically to account for inflation and maintenance needs. The Board of Supervisors, acting as the governing board of the FC District, provided public notice to all affected property owners prior to the establishment of the initial DABAs. The Board set the maximum assessment rate for each DABA when each drainage area was formed. A maximum reserve fund based on the estimated annual cost of the maintenance services was also established when each drainage area was formed. The purpose of this action was to provide adequate funding for unscheduled maintenance or contingencies. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the proposed DABAs, for Fiscal Year 2020-2021, are not implemented, routine and special drainage maintenance of flood control facilities in these drainage areas may not occur, which could impair the effectiveness of the flood control facilities in these drainage areas and negatively impact the surrounding watersheds. A significant impact in a watershed could cost the FC District and the County considerable amounts of money to repair and restore the flood control facility and surrounding areas. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2020/167 Exhibit A Proposed Fees Table 1 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2020/167 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/23/2020 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2020/167 In The Matter Of: Approving and Authorizing the Chief Engineer, Flood Control and Water Conservation District, or designee, to impose the Annual Benefit Assessments for Fiscal Year 2020-2021 for Drainage Area 67A (Walnut Creek), Drainage Area 75A (San Ramon), Drainage Area 76A (Alamo), Drainage Area 520 (Oakley), Drainage Area 910 (Danville), Drainage Area 1010 (Danville), and Drainage Area 1010A (Danville), Walnut Creek, San Ramon, Alamo, Oakley, and Danville areas. (100% Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Funds) Project No. 7505-6F8167, CP# 99-54 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, as the governing body of the Flood Control and Water Conservation District (referred to as the "FC District"), RESOLVES as follows: The FC District has previously established Drainage Areas 67A, 75A, 76A, 520, 910, 1010, and 1010A pursuant to the provisions of Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Act (West's Water Code–Appendix, Ch. 63); The FC District has previously determined and proposed for adoption within said drainage areas annual benefit assessments pursuant to the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982 (Gov. Code, Sections 54701-54718), which assessments were subsequently approved by the vote required by law; Once benefit assessments have been approved by the voters, Government Code Section 54717 (c) authorizes the Board annually to determine the cost of the services provided to the affected areas of benefit and to determine and impose the assessments; and The Board has before it the report (see attached Exhibit A), prepared by the Chief Engineer, which describes the cost of providing drainage and flood control services to the above-numbered drainage areas for Fiscal Year 2020-2021. Also attached are lists indicating the annual benefit assessments proposed to be levied against the parcels within the drainage areas to cover the cost of such services; and The proposed assessment rate amounts indicated do not exceed the maximum rates established for each of the Drainage Areas; The Board DETERMINES that the costs of the services financed by the benefit assessments for each drainage area are as shown on Table 1. The Board IMPOSES the annual benefit assessments set forth in the above-described report, attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof by reference, and DIRECTS that said benefit assessments be levied against the parcels within Drainage Areas 67A, 75A, 76A, 520, 910, 1010, and 1010A and collected in the same manner, and subject to the same penalties and priority of lien, as other charges and taxes fixed and collected by the County, as provided by Government Code Section 54718. Contact: Michelle Cordis, (925) 313-2381 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator's Office, Robin Cantu, County Assessor’s Office, Bob Campbell, County Auditor–Controller, Dorothy Lim, County cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator's Office, Robin Cantu, County Assessor’s Office, Bob Campbell, County Auditor–Controller, Dorothy Lim, County Auditor-Controller’s Office, Brice Bins, County Treasurer-Tax Collector's Office, Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Michelle Cordis, Flood Control, Patrick Melgar, Flood Control, Simone Saleh, Engineering Services, Catherine Windham, Flood Control Flood Control District Drainage Area Benefit Assessment (DABA) Districts Exhibit A Fiscal Year 2020-2021 FY 19-20 FY 19-20 Estimated FY 19-20 FY 19-20 FY 19-20 Estimated FY 20-21 FY 20-21 FY 20-21 FY 20-21 FY 20-21 FY 20-21 Begining Revolving Revenue Estimated Estimated Estimated Expense Estimated Estimated Total Estimated Estimated Estimated Fund Balance Fund to end of FY Mtce Admin Eng. Project to end of FY Beginning Asmnt Current Funds Mtce Admin Ending (from Beth Laserfische)July 1st Loans June 30th Expense Expense Expense June 30th Fund Balance Revenue Available Expense Expense Fund Balance DA 67A Rossmoor $501,700 -$ $35,000 $84,400 $12,000 $0 $96,400 $440,300 26,000.00$ $438,499 $67,100.00 $12,000.00 $399,200 DA 75A Canyon Lakes $331,719 -$ $80,189 $146,700 $22,000.00 $0 $168,700 $243,208 95,000.00$ $469,106 $148,300.00 $22,000.00 $189,908 DA 76A Bogue Ranch $374,304 -$ $80,400 $50,350 $12,000.00 $0 $62,350 $392,354 65,000.00$ $360,774 $57,700.00 $12,000.00 $399,654 DA 520 Laurel Basin $173,825 -$ $92,000 $37,500 $10,000.00 $0 $47,500 $218,325 78,000.00$ $147,360 $47,500.00 $10,000.00 $248,825 DA 910 Rassier Ranch $262,158 -$ $30,000 $44,500 $12,000.00 $0 $56,500 $235,658 18,000.00$ $272,081 $54,500.00 $12,000.00 $199,158 DA 1010 Bettencourt $1,365,675 -$ $65,000 $81,000 $12,000.00 $0 $93,000 $1,337,675 45,000.00$ $1,356,407 $176,000.00 $12,000.00 $1,206,675 DA 1010A Shadow Creek $371,268 -$ $40,500 $44,500 $12,000.00 $0 $56,500 $355,268 35,000.00$ $371,471 $91,000.00 $12,000.00 $299,268 Year Drainage Annual Mtce Ave Mtce Max Mtce Historical Max Maximum Rate IAUS FY 20/21 Total Est. 20-21 Projected Beginning Leftover balance Reserve Multiplier Target Reserve fund Estinated Actual Fund Balance Asmnt Rev Max Levy Rules Area Formed Per Eng Rpt Per Year Reserve Rate/IAU Adj for Inflation FY 19/20 Maintenance Exp Fund Balance without revenue Allowable per ER Actual Actual DA 67A Rossmoor 1987 $25,000 1 $25,000 $49.82 $112.32 3310.44 67,100.00$ $440,300 $373,200.00 4.67 $313,357.00 399,200.00$ 26,000.00$ DA 75A Canyon Lakes 1985 $63,000 1 $63,000 $20.00 $51.16 12330.49 148,300.00$ $243,208 $94,907.83 2 $296,600.00 189,907.83$ 95,000.00$ 2x the yearly rate DA 76A Bogue Ranch 1985 $20,000 5 $100,000 $65.07 $166.46 1544.83 57,700.00$ $392,354 $334,654.00 5 $288,500.00 399,654.00$ 65,000.00$ 2x the yearly rate DA 520 Laurel Basin 1987 $7,500 5 $37,500 $35.61 $80.28 1254.41 47,500.00$ $218,325 $170,825.00 5 $237,500.00 248,825.00$ 78,000.00$ 2x the yearly rate DA 910 Rassier Ranch 1990 $21,000 2 $42,000 $88.23 $188.23 686.43 54,500.00$ $235,658 $181,158.00 2 $109,000.00 199,158.00$ 18,000.00$ 2x the yearly rate DA 1010 Bettencourt 1988 $100,000 5 $500,000 $24.18 $54.51 11026.66 176,000.00$ $1,337,675 $1,161,675.00 5 $880,000.00 1,206,675.00$ 45,000.00$ 2x the yearly rate DA 1010A Shadow Creek 1988 $20,400 3 $61,200 $38.64 $87.11 1021.47 91,000.00$ $355,268 $446,268.00 3 $273,000.00 299,268.00$ 35,000.00$ 2x the yearly rate Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Rate/IAU Maximum Rate FY 00-01 FY 01-02 FY 02-03 FY 03-04 FY 04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08 FY 08-09 FY 09-10 FY 10-11 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13-14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 FY 18-19 FY 19-20 FY 20-21 Adj for Inflation DA 67A Rossmoor LA $7.08 $13.18 $17.29 $5.97 $7.45 $6.00 $4.57 $4.57 $4.57 $9.14 $10.97 $12.49 $12.49 $14.03 $15.56 $19.84 $24.11 $30.21 $19.63 $10.57 $7.85 $112.32 DA 75A Canyon Lakes JR $6.98 $6.98 $6.63 $2.10 $5.03 $5.03 $4.91 $4.91 $4.91 $4.50 $5.48 $6.38 $6.38 $6.62 $8.01 $8.99 $9.40 $11.45 $6.13 $6.50 $7.70 $51.16 DA 76A Bogue Ranch LB $13.71 $13.71 $30.13 $26.23 $18.62 $26.18 $26.18 $26.18 $26.18 $6.54 $26.83 $32.07 $32.06 $37.89 $45.66 $63.26 $75.66 $90.62 $51.79 $52.04 $42.08 $166.46 DA 520 Laurel Basin LC $4.76 $3.17 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $9.32 $8.13 $7.97 $7.97 $6.38 $8.77 $11.16 $11.16 $14.35 $18.33 $23.92 $30.29 $37.47 $36.67 $73.34 $62.18 $80.28 DA 910 Rassier Ranch LI $13.19 $14.66 $35.18 $41.04 $68.01 $84.61 $36.47 $36.47 $36.47 $29.17 $36.47 $42.68 $49.66 $49.58 $51.04 $62.70 $67.08 $50.99 $46.62 $43.70 $26.22 $188.23 DA 1010 Bettencourt LD $0.91 $1.47 $11.84 $8.13 $4.73 $9.04 $9.04 $9.04 $9.06 $6.79 $8.88 $11.50 $11.50 $14.95 $19.48 $22.28 $23.37 $27.21 $9.07 $5.89 $4.08 $54.51 DA 1010A Shadow Creek LE $37.20 $41.12 $33.29 $35.24 $37.69 $48.95 $48.95 $48.95 $37.69 $31.33 $36.22 $41.12 $41.12 $46.99 $47.97 $66.57 $78.32 $88.11 $48.95 $39.65 $34.26 $87.11 $11.98 $13.47 $19.19 $16.96 $20.22 $27.02 $19.75 $19.73 $18.12 $13.41 $19.09 $22.49 $23.48 $26.34 $29.44 $38.22 $44.03 $48.01 $31.27 $33.10 $26.34 $105.72 Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Drainage Area Average Rate-----> Levy Code Drainage Area Drainage Area G:\FC_Accounting\DABA\FY 20-21\Copy of MASTER SPREADSHEET FY 20-21 6/1/2020 10:38 AM Page 1 Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 1 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 203-061-001-4 203-061-002-2 203-061-003-0 203-061-004-8 203-061-005-5 203-061-006-3 203-061-007-1 203-061-008-9 203-061-009-7 203-061-010-5 203-061-011-3 203-061-012-1 203-061-013-9 203-061-014-7 203-061-015-4 203-061-016-2 203-061-017-0 203-061-018-8 203-061-019-6 203-061-020-4 203-061-021-2 203-061-022-0 203-061-023-8 203-061-024-6 203-061-025-3 203-061-026-1 203-061-027-9 203-061-028-7 203-061-029-5 203-061-030-3 203-061-031-1 203-061-032-9 203-061-033-7 203-061-034-5 203-061-035-2 203-061-036-0 203-061-037-8 203-061-038-6 203-061-039-4 203-061-040-2 203-061-041-0 203-061-042-8 203-061-043-6 203-061-044-4 203-061-045-1 203-061-046-9 203-061-047-7 203-061-048-5 203-061-049-3 203-061-050-1 203-061-051-9 203-061-052-7 203-061-053-5 203-061-054-3 203-061-055-0 203-061-056-8 203-061-057-6 203-061-058-4 203-061-059-2 203-061-060-0 203-061-061-8 203-061-062-6 203-061-063-4 203-061-064-2 203-061-065-9 203-061-066-7 203-061-067-5 203-061-068-3 203-061-069-1 203-061-070-9 203-071-001-2 203-071-002-0 203-071-003-8 203-071-004-6 203-071-005-3 203-071-006-1 203-071-007-9 203-071-008-7 203-071-009-5 203-071-010-3 203-071-011-1 203-071-012-9 203-071-013-7 203-071-014-5 203-071-015-2 203-071-016-0 203-071-017-8 203-071-018-6 203-071-019-4 203-071-020-2 203-071-021-0 203-071-022-8 203-071-023-6 203-071-024-4 203-071-025-1 203-071-026-9 203-071-027-7 203-071-028-5 203-071-029-3 203-071-030-1 203-071-031-9 203-071-032-7 203-071-033-5 203-071-034-3 203-071-035-0 203-071-036-8 203-071-037-6 203-071-038-4 203-071-039-2 203-071-040-0 203-071-041-8 203-071-042-6 203-071-043-4 203-071-044-2 203-071-045-9 203-071-046-7 203-071-047-5 203-071-048-3 203-071-049-1 203-071-050-9 203-071-051-7 203-071-052-5 203-071-053-3 203-071-054-1 203-071-055-8 203-071-056-6 203-071-057-4 203-071-058-2 203-071-059-0 203-071-060-8 203-071-061-6 203-071-062-4 203-071-063-2 203-071-064-0 203-071-065-7 203-071-066-5 203-071-067-3 203-071-068-1 203-071-069-9 203-071-070-7 203-071-071-5 203-071-072-3 203-071-073-1 203-071-074-9 203-071-075-6 203-071-076-4 203-071-077-2 203-071-078-0 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 3.60 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 5.44 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 7.06 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.20 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 2 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 203-071-079-8 203-071-080-6 203-071-081-4 203-071-082-2 203-071-083-0 203-071-084-8 203-071-085-5 203-071-086-3 203-071-087-1 203-071-088-9 203-071-089-7 206-010-027-4 206-010-030-8 206-010-033-2 206-010-037-3 206-010-038-1 206-010-045-6 206-010-046-4 206-010-049-8 206-010-050-6 206-010-051-4 206-010-053-0 206-010-054-8 206-010-055-5 206-010-056-3 206-010-059-7 206-010-061-3 206-020-059-5 206-020-078-5 206-020-079-3 206-020-081-9 206-272-026-9 206-272-027-7 206-272-028-5 206-272-029-3 206-272-030-1 206-272-031-9 206-281-001-1 206-281-002-9 206-281-003-7 206-281-004-5 206-281-008-6 206-281-009-4 206-281-010-2 206-281-011-0 206-281-012-8 206-281-013-6 206-281-014-4 206-281-015-1 206-281-016-9 206-281-017-7 206-281-018-5 206-281-019-3 206-281-020-1 206-281-021-9 206-281-022-7 206-281-023-5 206-281-024-3 206-281-025-0 206-281-026-8 206-281-027-6 206-281-028-4 206-281-029-2 206-281-030-0 206-281-031-8 206-281-032-6 206-281-033-4 206-281-034-2 206-281-035-9 206-281-039-1 206-281-040-9 206-281-041-7 206-281-042-5 206-281-043-3 206-282-005-1 206-282-006-9 206-282-007-7 206-282-008-5 206-282-009-3 206-282-012-7 206-282-013-5 206-282-014-3 206-282-017-6 206-282-018-4 206-282-019-2 206-282-021-8 206-282-022-6 206-282-023-4 206-282-024-2 206-282-025-9 206-282-026-7 206-283-001-9 206-283-002-7 206-283-003-5 206-283-004-3 206-283-005-0 206-283-006-8 206-283-007-6 206-283-008-4 206-283-009-2 206-283-010-0 206-283-011-8 206-283-012-6 206-283-013-4 206-283-014-2 206-283-015-9 206-283-019-1 206-283-020-9 206-283-021-7 206-283-022-5 206-283-023-3 206-283-024-1 206-283-025-8 206-283-026-6 206-283-027-4 206-283-028-2 206-283-029-0 206-283-030-8 206-283-031-6 206-283-032-4 206-283-033-2 206-283-044-9 206-283-045-6 206-283-048-0 206-283-049-8 206-283-050-6 206-283-051-4 206-283-052-2 206-283-053-0 206-283-054-8 206-283-055-5 206-283-056-3 206-283-057-1 206-283-059-7 206-283-060-5 206-283-061-3 206-283-062-1 206-283-063-9 206-283-064-7 206-283-065-4 206-283-066-2 206-283-067-0 206-283-068-8 206-283-069-6 206-291-001-9 206-291-002-7 206-292-001-8 206-292-002-6 $ 4.44 $ 4.44 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 194.92 $ 330.86 $ 2,011.92 $ 241.44 $ 931.74 $ 80.48 $ 105.50 $ 214.60 $ 93.00 $ 637.02 $ 43.28 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 19.64 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 3 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 206-292-003-4 206-292-004-2 206-292-005-9 206-292-006-7 206-293-001-7 206-293-002-5 206-293-003-3 206-293-004-1 206-293-005-8 206-293-006-6 206-293-007-4 206-293-008-2 206-293-009-0 206-293-010-8 206-293-011-6 206-293-012-4 206-293-013-2 206-293-014-0 206-294-001-6 206-294-002-4 206-294-003-2 206-294-004-0 206-294-005-7 206-294-006-5 206-294-007-3 206-294-008-1 206-294-009-9 206-294-010-7 206-294-011-5 206-294-012-3 206-294-013-1 206-294-014-9 206-294-015-6 206-294-016-4 206-294-017-2 206-294-018-0 206-294-019-8 206-294-020-6 206-294-021-4 206-294-022-2 206-294-023-0 206-294-024-8 206-301-001-7 206-301-002-5 206-301-003-3 206-301-004-1 206-301-005-8 206-301-006-6 206-301-007-4 206-301-008-2 206-301-009-0 206-301-010-8 206-302-001-6 206-302-002-4 206-302-003-2 206-302-004-0 206-302-005-7 206-302-006-5 206-302-007-3 206-302-008-1 206-302-009-9 206-302-010-7 206-302-011-5 206-302-012-3 206-303-001-5 206-303-002-3 206-303-003-1 206-304-001-4 206-311-001-5 206-311-002-3 206-311-003-1 206-311-004-9 206-311-005-6 206-311-020-5 206-311-022-1 206-311-023-9 206-311-024-7 206-311-025-4 206-311-026-2 206-312-001-4 206-312-002-2 206-312-003-0 206-312-004-8 206-312-005-5 206-341-001-9 206-341-002-7 206-341-003-5 206-341-004-3 206-341-005-0 206-341-006-8 206-341-007-6 206-342-006-7 206-342-007-5 206-342-008-3 206-342-009-1 206-342-010-9 206-342-011-7 206-342-012-5 206-342-013-3 206-342-014-1 206-342-015-8 206-342-016-6 206-342-017-4 206-342-018-2 206-342-019-0 206-342-020-8 206-342-021-6 206-342-022-4 206-342-023-2 206-342-024-0 206-342-025-7 206-342-026-5 206-342-027-3 206-343-001-7 206-343-002-5 206-343-003-3 206-343-004-1 206-343-005-8 206-343-006-6 206-343-007-4 206-343-008-2 206-343-009-0 206-343-010-8 206-343-011-6 206-343-012-4 206-343-013-2 206-343-014-0 206-343-015-7 206-343-016-5 206-343-017-3 206-343-018-1 206-343-019-9 206-343-020-7 206-343-021-5 206-343-022-3 206-343-023-1 206-343-024-9 206-343-025-6 206-343-026-4 206-343-027-2 206-343-028-0 206-343-029-8 206-351-001-6 206-351-002-4 206-351-003-2 206-351-004-0 206-351-005-7 206-351-006-5 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 31.46 $ 110.88 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 4 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 206-351-007-3 206-351-008-1 206-351-009-9 206-351-024-8 206-351-025-5 206-351-026-3 206-351-027-1 206-351-028-9 206-351-029-7 206-351-030-5 206-351-031-3 206-351-032-1 206-351-033-9 206-351-034-7 206-351-035-4 206-351-036-2 206-351-037-0 206-352-001-5 206-352-002-3 206-352-003-1 206-352-004-9 206-353-003-0 206-353-004-8 206-353-005-5 206-353-006-3 206-353-007-1 206-353-008-9 206-353-009-7 206-353-010-5 206-353-011-3 206-353-012-1 206-353-013-9 206-353-014-7 206-353-015-4 206-353-016-2 206-353-017-0 206-353-018-8 206-353-019-6 206-353-020-4 206-353-021-2 206-353-022-0 206-353-023-8 206-353-024-6 206-353-025-3 206-353-026-1 206-353-027-9 206-353-028-7 206-353-029-5 206-353-030-3 206-353-031-1 206-353-032-9 206-353-033-7 206-353-034-5 206-353-035-2 206-353-036-0 206-353-037-8 206-353-038-6 206-353-039-4 206-353-040-2 206-353-041-0 206-353-042-8 206-353-043-6 206-353-044-4 206-353-045-1 206-353-046-9 206-353-047-7 206-353-048-5 206-353-049-3 206-353-050-1 206-353-051-9 206-353-052-7 206-353-053-5 206-353-054-3 206-353-055-0 206-353-056-8 206-353-057-6 206-353-058-4 206-353-059-2 206-353-060-0 206-362-032-8 206-362-033-6 206-371-001-2 206-371-002-0 206-371-003-8 206-371-004-6 206-371-011-1 206-371-012-9 206-371-013-7 206-371-014-5 206-371-016-0 206-371-017-8 206-371-018-6 206-371-019-4 206-371-020-2 206-371-021-0 206-371-022-8 206-371-023-6 206-371-024-4 206-380-001-1 206-380-002-9 206-380-003-7 206-380-004-5 206-380-005-2 206-380-006-0 206-380-007-8 206-380-008-6 206-380-009-4 206-380-010-2 206-380-011-0 206-380-012-8 206-380-013-6 206-380-014-4 206-380-015-1 206-380-016-9 206-380-017-7 206-380-018-5 206-380-019-3 206-380-020-1 206-380-021-9 206-380-022-7 206-380-023-5 206-380-024-3 206-380-025-0 206-380-026-8 206-380-027-6 206-380-028-4 206-380-029-2 206-380-030-0 206-380-031-8 206-380-032-6 206-380-033-4 206-380-034-2 206-380-035-9 206-380-036-7 206-380-037-5 206-380-038-3 206-380-039-1 206-380-040-9 206-380-041-7 206-380-042-5 206-380-043-3 206-380-044-1 206-380-045-8 206-380-046-6 206-380-047-4 206-380-048-2 206-380-049-0 206-380-050-8 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 22.80 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 5 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 206-380-051-6 206-380-052-4 206-380-053-2 206-380-054-0 206-380-055-7 206-380-056-5 206-380-057-3 206-380-058-1 206-380-059-9 206-380-060-7 206-380-061-5 206-380-062-3 206-380-063-1 206-380-064-9 206-380-065-6 206-380-066-4 206-380-067-2 206-380-068-0 206-380-069-8 206-380-070-6 206-380-072-2 206-380-073-0 206-380-074-8 206-380-075-5 206-380-076-3 206-380-077-1 206-380-078-9 206-380-079-7 206-380-080-5 206-380-081-3 206-380-082-1 206-380-083-9 206-380-084-7 206-380-085-4 206-380-086-2 206-380-087-0 206-380-088-8 206-380-089-6 206-380-090-4 206-380-091-2 206-380-092-0 206-380-093-8 206-380-094-6 206-380-095-3 206-380-096-1 206-380-097-9 206-380-098-7 206-380-099-5 206-380-100-1 206-380-101-9 206-380-102-7 206-380-103-5 206-380-104-3 206-380-105-0 206-380-106-8 206-380-107-6 206-380-108-4 206-380-109-2 206-380-110-0 206-380-111-8 206-380-112-6 206-380-113-4 206-380-114-2 206-380-115-9 206-380-116-7 206-380-117-5 206-380-118-3 206-380-119-1 206-380-120-9 206-380-121-7 206-380-122-5 206-380-123-3 206-380-124-1 206-380-125-8 206-380-126-6 206-380-127-4 206-380-128-2 206-380-129-0 206-380-130-8 206-380-131-6 206-380-132-4 206-380-133-2 206-380-134-0 206-380-135-7 206-380-136-5 206-380-137-3 206-380-138-1 206-380-139-9 206-380-140-7 206-380-141-5 206-380-142-3 206-380-143-1 206-380-144-9 206-380-145-6 206-380-146-4 206-380-147-2 206-380-148-0 206-380-149-8 206-380-150-6 206-380-151-4 206-380-152-2 206-380-153-0 206-380-154-8 206-380-155-5 206-380-156-3 206-380-157-1 206-380-158-9 206-380-159-7 206-380-160-5 206-380-161-3 206-380-162-1 206-380-163-9 206-380-164-7 206-380-165-4 206-380-166-2 206-380-167-0 206-380-168-8 206-380-169-6 206-380-170-4 206-390-001-9 206-390-002-7 206-390-003-5 206-390-004-3 206-390-005-0 206-390-006-8 206-390-007-6 206-390-008-4 206-390-009-2 206-390-010-0 206-390-011-8 206-390-012-6 206-390-013-4 206-390-014-2 206-390-015-9 206-390-016-7 206-390-017-5 206-390-018-3 206-390-019-1 206-390-020-9 206-390-021-7 206-390-022-5 206-390-023-3 206-390-024-1 206-390-025-8 206-390-026-6 206-390-027-4 206-390-028-2 206-390-029-0 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 6 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 206-390-030-8 206-390-031-6 206-390-032-4 206-401-001-6 206-401-002-4 206-401-003-2 206-402-001-5 206-402-002-3 206-402-003-1 206-402-004-9 206-402-005-6 206-402-006-4 206-402-007-2 206-402-008-0 206-402-009-8 206-402-010-6 206-402-011-4 206-402-012-2 206-402-013-0 206-403-001-4 206-403-002-2 206-403-003-0 206-403-004-8 206-403-005-5 206-403-006-3 206-403-007-1 206-403-008-9 206-403-009-7 206-403-010-5 206-403-011-3 206-404-001-3 206-404-002-1 206-404-003-9 206-404-004-7 206-404-005-4 206-404-006-2 206-404-007-0 206-404-008-8 206-404-009-6 206-404-010-4 206-404-011-2 206-404-012-0 206-404-013-8 206-404-014-6 206-404-015-3 206-404-016-1 206-404-017-9 206-404-018-7 206-404-019-5 206-404-020-3 206-404-021-1 206-404-022-9 206-404-023-7 206-404-024-5 206-404-025-2 206-404-026-0 206-404-027-8 206-404-028-6 206-404-029-4 206-404-030-2 206-404-031-0 206-404-032-8 206-404-033-6 206-404-034-4 206-404-035-1 206-404-036-9 206-404-037-7 206-404-038-5 206-404-039-3 206-404-040-1 206-404-041-9 206-404-042-7 206-404-043-5 206-404-044-3 206-404-045-0 206-404-046-8 206-404-047-6 206-404-048-4 206-410-001-5 206-410-002-3 206-410-003-1 206-410-004-9 206-410-005-6 206-410-006-4 206-410-007-2 206-410-008-0 206-410-009-8 206-410-010-6 206-410-011-4 206-410-012-2 206-410-013-0 206-410-014-8 206-410-015-5 206-410-016-3 206-410-017-1 206-410-018-9 206-410-019-7 206-410-020-5 206-410-021-3 206-410-022-1 206-410-023-9 206-410-024-7 206-410-025-4 206-410-026-2 206-410-027-0 206-410-028-8 206-410-029-6 206-410-030-4 206-410-031-2 206-410-032-0 206-410-033-8 206-410-034-6 206-410-035-3 206-410-036-1 206-410-037-9 206-410-038-7 206-410-039-5 206-410-040-3 206-410-041-1 206-410-042-9 206-410-043-7 206-410-044-5 206-410-045-2 206-410-046-0 206-410-047-8 206-410-048-6 206-410-049-4 206-410-050-2 206-410-051-0 206-410-052-8 206-410-053-6 206-410-054-4 206-410-055-1 206-410-056-9 206-410-057-7 206-410-058-5 206-410-059-3 206-410-060-1 206-410-061-9 206-410-062-7 206-410-063-5 206-410-064-3 206-410-065-0 206-410-066-8 206-410-067-6 206-410-068-4 206-410-069-2 206-410-070-0 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 31.46 $ 26.24 $ 31.46 $ 31.46 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 26.24 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 17.44 $ 22.80 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 20.68 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 17.44 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 20.68 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 7 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 206-410-071-8 206-410-072-6 206-410-073-4 206-410-074-2 206-420-001-3 206-420-002-1 206-420-003-9 206-420-004-7 206-420-005-4 206-420-006-2 206-420-007-0 206-420-008-8 206-420-009-6 206-420-010-4 206-420-011-2 206-420-012-0 206-420-013-8 206-420-014-6 206-420-015-3 206-420-016-1 206-420-017-9 206-420-018-7 206-420-019-5 206-420-020-3 206-420-021-1 206-420-022-9 206-420-023-7 206-420-024-5 206-420-025-2 206-420-026-0 206-420-027-8 206-420-028-6 206-420-029-4 206-420-030-2 206-420-031-0 206-420-032-8 206-420-033-6 206-420-034-4 206-420-035-1 206-420-036-9 206-420-037-7 206-420-038-5 206-420-039-3 206-420-040-1 206-420-041-9 206-420-042-7 206-420-043-5 206-420-044-3 206-420-045-0 206-420-046-8 206-420-047-6 206-420-048-4 206-420-049-2 206-420-050-0 206-420-051-8 206-420-052-6 206-420-053-4 206-420-054-2 206-420-055-9 206-420-056-7 206-420-057-5 206-420-058-3 206-420-059-1 206-420-060-9 206-420-061-7 206-420-062-5 206-420-063-3 206-420-064-1 206-420-065-8 206-420-066-6 206-420-067-4 206-420-068-2 206-420-069-0 206-420-070-8 206-420-071-6 206-420-072-4 206-420-073-2 206-420-074-0 206-420-075-7 206-420-076-5 206-420-077-3 206-420-078-1 206-420-079-9 206-420-080-7 206-420-081-5 206-420-082-3 206-420-083-1 206-420-084-9 206-420-085-6 206-420-086-4 206-420-087-2 206-420-088-0 206-420-089-8 206-420-090-6 206-420-091-4 206-420-092-2 206-420-093-0 206-420-094-8 206-420-095-5 206-420-096-3 206-420-097-1 206-420-098-9 206-420-099-7 206-420-100-3 206-420-101-1 206-420-102-9 206-420-103-7 206-420-104-5 206-420-105-2 206-420-106-0 206-420-107-8 206-420-108-6 206-420-109-4 206-420-110-2 206-420-111-0 206-420-112-8 206-420-113-6 206-420-114-4 206-420-115-1 206-420-116-9 206-420-117-7 206-420-118-5 206-420-119-3 206-420-120-1 206-420-121-9 206-420-122-7 206-420-123-5 206-420-124-3 206-420-125-0 206-420-126-8 206-420-127-6 206-420-128-4 206-420-129-2 206-420-130-0 206-420-131-8 206-420-132-6 206-420-133-4 206-420-134-2 206-420-135-9 206-420-136-7 206-420-137-5 206-420-138-3 206-420-139-1 206-420-140-9 206-420-141-7 206-420-142-5 206-420-143-3 206-420-144-1 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 8 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 206-420-145-8 206-420-146-6 206-420-147-4 206-420-148-2 206-420-149-0 206-420-150-8 206-420-151-6 206-420-152-4 206-420-153-2 206-420-154-0 206-420-155-7 206-420-156-5 206-420-157-3 206-420-158-1 206-420-159-9 206-420-160-7 206-420-161-5 206-420-162-3 206-420-163-1 206-420-164-9 206-420-165-6 206-420-166-4 206-420-167-2 206-420-168-0 206-420-169-8 206-420-170-6 206-420-171-4 206-420-172-2 206-420-173-0 206-420-174-8 206-420-175-5 206-420-176-3 206-420-177-1 206-420-178-9 206-420-179-7 206-420-180-5 206-420-181-3 206-420-182-1 206-420-183-9 206-420-184-7 206-420-185-4 206-420-186-2 206-420-187-0 206-420-188-8 206-420-189-6 206-420-190-4 206-420-191-2 206-420-192-0 206-420-193-8 206-420-194-6 206-420-195-3 206-420-196-1 206-420-198-7 206-420-200-1 206-420-201-9 206-420-202-7 217-060-020-5 217-060-023-9 217-060-030-4 217-060-035-3 217-060-040-3 217-060-041-1 217-371-001-9 217-371-002-7 217-371-003-5 217-371-004-3 217-371-005-0 217-371-006-8 217-371-007-6 217-371-008-4 217-371-009-2 217-371-010-0 217-371-011-8 217-371-012-6 217-371-013-4 217-371-014-2 217-371-015-9 217-371-016-7 217-371-017-5 217-371-018-3 217-371-019-1 217-371-020-9 217-371-021-7 217-371-022-5 217-371-023-3 217-371-024-1 217-371-025-8 217-371-026-6 217-371-027-4 217-371-028-2 217-372-001-8 217-372-002-6 217-372-003-4 217-372-004-2 217-372-005-9 217-372-006-7 217-372-007-5 217-372-008-3 217-372-009-1 217-372-010-9 217-373-001-7 217-373-002-5 217-373-003-3 217-373-004-1 217-373-005-8 217-373-006-6 217-373-007-4 217-373-008-2 217-373-009-0 217-373-010-8 217-373-011-6 217-373-012-4 217-373-013-2 217-373-014-0 217-373-015-7 217-381-001-7 217-381-002-5 217-381-003-3 217-381-004-1 217-381-005-8 217-381-006-6 217-381-007-4 217-381-008-2 217-381-009-0 217-381-010-8 217-381-011-6 217-381-012-4 217-382-001-6 217-382-002-4 217-382-003-2 217-382-004-0 217-382-005-7 217-382-006-5 217-382-007-3 217-382-008-1 217-382-009-9 217-382-010-7 217-382-011-5 217-382-012-3 217-382-013-1 217-383-001-5 217-383-002-3 217-383-003-1 217-383-004-9 217-383-005-6 217-383-006-4 217-383-007-2 217-383-008-0 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 3.98 $ 186.00 $ 177.06 $ 18.92 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 9 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 217-383-009-8 217-383-010-6 217-383-011-4 217-383-012-2 217-390-001-6 217-390-002-4 217-390-003-2 217-390-004-0 217-390-005-7 217-390-006-5 217-390-007-3 217-390-008-1 217-390-009-9 217-390-010-7 217-390-011-5 217-390-012-3 217-390-013-1 217-390-014-9 217-390-015-6 217-390-016-4 217-390-017-2 217-390-018-0 217-390-019-8 217-390-020-6 217-390-021-4 217-390-022-2 217-390-023-0 217-390-024-8 217-390-025-5 217-390-026-3 217-390-027-1 217-390-028-9 217-390-029-7 217-390-030-5 217-390-031-3 217-390-032-1 217-390-033-9 217-390-034-7 217-390-035-4 217-390-036-2 217-390-037-0 217-390-038-8 217-390-039-6 217-401-001-3 217-401-002-1 217-401-003-9 217-401-004-7 217-401-005-4 217-401-006-2 217-401-007-0 217-401-008-8 217-401-009-6 217-401-010-4 217-401-011-2 217-401-012-0 217-401-013-8 217-401-014-6 217-401-015-3 217-401-016-1 217-401-017-9 217-401-018-7 217-401-019-5 217-401-020-3 217-401-021-1 217-401-022-9 217-401-023-7 217-401-024-5 217-401-025-2 217-401-026-0 217-401-027-8 217-401-028-6 217-401-029-4 217-401-030-2 217-401-031-0 217-401-032-8 217-401-033-6 217-401-034-4 217-401-035-1 217-401-036-9 217-401-037-7 217-401-038-5 217-401-039-3 217-401-040-1 217-401-041-9 217-401-042-7 217-401-043-5 217-401-044-3 217-401-045-0 217-401-046-8 217-401-047-6 217-402-006-1 217-402-007-9 217-402-008-7 217-402-009-5 217-402-010-3 217-410-001-2 217-410-002-0 217-410-003-8 217-410-004-6 217-410-005-3 217-410-006-1 217-410-007-9 217-410-008-7 217-410-009-5 217-410-010-3 217-410-011-1 217-410-012-9 217-410-013-7 217-410-014-5 217-410-015-2 217-410-016-0 217-410-017-8 217-410-018-6 217-410-019-4 217-410-020-2 217-410-021-0 217-410-022-8 217-410-023-6 217-410-024-4 217-410-025-1 217-410-026-9 217-410-027-7 217-410-028-5 217-410-029-3 217-410-030-1 217-410-031-9 217-410-032-7 217-410-033-5 217-410-034-3 217-410-035-0 217-410-036-8 217-410-037-6 217-410-038-4 217-410-039-2 217-410-040-0 217-410-041-8 217-410-042-6 217-410-043-4 217-410-044-2 217-410-045-9 217-410-046-7 217-410-047-5 217-410-048-3 217-410-049-1 217-410-050-9 217-410-051-7 217-410-052-5 217-410-053-3 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 10 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 217-410-054-1 217-410-055-8 217-410-056-6 217-410-057-4 217-410-058-2 217-410-059-0 217-410-060-8 217-410-061-6 217-410-062-4 217-410-063-2 217-410-064-0 217-410-065-7 217-410-066-5 217-410-067-3 217-410-068-1 217-410-069-9 217-410-070-7 217-410-071-5 217-410-072-3 217-410-073-1 217-410-074-9 217-410-075-6 217-410-076-4 217-410-077-2 217-410-078-0 217-410-083-0 217-410-084-8 217-410-085-5 217-410-086-3 217-410-087-1 217-410-088-9 217-410-089-7 217-410-090-5 217-410-091-3 217-420-001-0 217-420-002-8 217-420-003-6 217-420-004-4 217-420-005-1 217-420-006-9 217-420-007-7 217-420-008-5 217-420-009-3 217-420-010-1 217-420-011-9 217-420-012-7 217-420-013-5 217-420-014-3 217-420-015-0 217-420-016-8 217-420-017-6 217-420-018-4 217-420-019-2 217-420-020-0 217-420-021-8 217-420-022-6 217-420-023-4 217-420-024-2 217-420-025-9 217-420-026-7 217-420-027-5 217-420-028-3 217-420-029-1 217-420-030-9 217-420-031-7 217-420-032-5 217-420-033-3 217-420-034-1 217-420-035-8 217-420-036-6 217-420-037-4 217-420-038-2 217-420-039-0 217-420-040-8 217-420-041-6 217-420-042-4 217-420-043-2 217-420-044-0 217-420-045-7 217-420-046-5 217-420-047-3 217-420-048-1 217-420-049-9 217-420-050-7 217-420-051-5 217-420-052-3 217-420-053-1 217-420-054-9 217-420-055-6 217-420-056-4 217-420-057-2 217-420-058-0 217-420-059-8 217-420-060-6 217-420-061-4 217-420-062-2 217-420-063-0 217-420-064-8 217-420-065-5 217-420-066-3 217-420-067-1 217-420-068-9 217-420-069-7 217-420-070-5 217-420-071-3 217-420-072-1 217-420-073-9 217-420-074-7 217-420-075-4 217-420-076-2 217-420-080-4 217-420-082-0 217-420-083-8 217-420-084-6 217-420-085-3 217-430-001-8 217-430-002-6 217-430-003-4 217-430-004-2 217-430-005-9 217-430-006-7 217-430-007-5 217-430-008-3 217-430-009-1 217-430-010-9 217-430-011-7 217-430-012-5 217-430-013-3 217-430-014-1 217-430-015-8 217-430-016-6 217-430-017-4 217-430-018-2 217-430-019-0 217-430-020-8 217-430-021-6 217-430-022-4 217-430-023-2 217-430-024-0 217-430-025-7 217-430-026-5 217-430-027-3 217-430-028-1 217-430-029-9 217-430-030-7 217-430-031-5 217-430-032-3 217-430-033-1 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.92 $ 22.80 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 26.24 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.04 $ 4.04 $ 4.04 $ 4.04 $ 4.04 $ 4.04 $ 4.04 $ 4.04 $ 4.04 $ 4.04 $ 4.04 $ 4.04 $ 4.04 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 11 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 217-430-034-9 217-430-035-6 217-430-036-4 217-430-037-2 217-430-038-0 217-430-039-8 217-430-040-6 217-430-041-4 217-430-042-2 217-430-043-0 217-430-044-8 217-430-045-5 217-430-046-3 217-430-047-1 217-430-048-9 217-430-049-7 217-430-050-5 217-430-051-3 217-430-052-1 217-430-053-9 217-430-054-7 217-430-055-4 217-430-056-2 217-430-059-6 217-430-060-4 217-430-061-2 217-430-062-0 217-430-063-8 217-430-064-6 217-430-065-3 217-430-066-1 217-430-067-9 217-430-068-7 217-430-069-5 217-430-070-3 217-430-071-1 217-430-072-9 217-430-073-7 217-430-074-5 217-430-075-2 217-430-076-0 217-430-077-8 217-430-078-6 217-430-079-4 217-430-080-2 217-430-081-0 217-430-082-8 217-430-083-6 217-430-084-4 217-430-085-1 217-430-086-9 217-430-087-7 217-430-088-5 217-430-093-5 217-430-094-3 217-430-095-0 217-430-096-8 217-430-097-6 217-430-099-2 217-430-100-8 217-430-103-2 217-430-104-0 217-430-105-7 217-430-106-5 217-430-107-3 217-430-108-1 217-430-109-9 217-430-110-7 217-430-111-5 217-430-112-3 217-430-113-1 217-430-114-9 217-430-115-6 217-450-001-3 217-450-002-1 217-450-003-9 217-450-004-7 217-450-005-4 217-450-006-2 217-450-007-0 217-450-008-8 217-450-009-6 217-450-010-4 217-450-011-2 217-450-012-0 217-450-013-8 217-450-014-6 217-450-015-3 217-450-016-1 217-450-017-9 217-450-018-7 217-450-019-5 217-450-020-3 217-450-021-1 217-450-022-9 217-450-023-7 217-450-024-5 217-450-025-2 217-450-026-0 217-450-027-8 217-450-028-6 217-450-029-4 217-450-030-2 217-450-031-0 217-450-032-8 217-450-033-6 217-450-034-4 217-450-035-1 217-450-036-9 217-450-037-7 217-450-038-5 217-450-039-3 217-450-040-1 217-450-041-9 217-450-042-7 217-450-043-5 217-450-044-3 217-450-045-0 217-450-046-8 217-450-047-6 217-450-048-4 217-450-049-2 217-450-050-0 217-450-051-8 217-450-052-6 217-450-053-4 217-450-054-2 217-450-055-9 217-450-056-7 217-450-057-5 217-450-058-3 217-450-059-1 217-450-060-9 217-450-061-7 217-450-062-5 217-450-063-3 217-450-064-1 217-450-065-8 217-450-066-6 217-450-067-4 217-450-068-2 217-450-069-0 217-450-070-8 217-450-071-6 217-450-072-4 217-450-073-2 217-450-074-0 217-450-075-7 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 3.94 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 4.00 $ 4.00 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 8.90 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 3.38 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 7.76 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 $ 3.30 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 12 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 217-450-076-5 217-450-077-3 217-450-078-1 217-450-079-9 217-450-080-7 217-450-081-5 217-450-082-3 217-460-001-1 217-460-002-9 217-460-003-7 217-460-004-5 217-460-005-2 217-460-006-0 217-460-007-8 217-460-008-6 217-460-009-4 217-460-010-2 217-460-011-0 217-460-012-8 217-460-013-6 217-460-014-4 217-460-015-1 217-460-016-9 217-460-017-7 217-460-018-5 217-460-019-3 217-460-020-1 217-460-021-9 217-460-022-7 217-460-023-5 217-460-024-3 217-460-025-0 217-460-026-8 217-460-027-6 217-460-028-4 217-460-029-2 217-460-030-0 217-460-031-8 217-460-032-6 217-460-033-4 217-460-034-2 217-460-035-9 217-460-036-7 217-460-037-5 217-460-038-3 217-460-039-1 217-460-040-9 217-460-041-7 217-460-042-5 217-460-043-3 217-460-044-1 217-460-045-8 217-460-046-6 217-460-047-4 217-460-048-2 217-460-049-0 217-460-050-8 217-460-051-6 217-460-052-4 217-460-053-2 217-460-054-0 217-460-055-7 217-460-056-5 217-460-057-3 217-460-058-1 217-460-059-9 217-460-060-7 217-460-061-5 217-460-062-3 217-460-063-1 217-460-064-9 217-460-065-6 217-460-066-4 217-460-067-2 217-460-068-0 217-460-069-8 217-460-070-6 217-460-071-4 217-460-072-2 217-460-073-0 217-460-074-8 217-460-075-5 217-460-076-3 217-460-077-1 217-460-078-9 217-460-079-7 217-460-080-5 217-460-081-3 217-460-082-1 217-460-083-9 217-460-084-7 217-460-085-4 217-460-086-2 217-460-087-0 217-470-002-7 217-470-003-5 217-470-004-3 217-470-005-0 217-470-006-8 217-470-007-6 217-470-008-4 217-470-009-2 217-470-010-0 217-470-011-8 217-470-012-6 217-470-013-4 217-470-014-2 217-470-015-9 217-470-016-7 217-470-017-5 217-470-018-3 217-470-019-1 217-470-020-9 217-470-022-5 217-470-023-3 217-470-024-1 217-470-025-8 217-470-026-6 217-470-027-4 217-470-028-2 217-470-029-0 217-470-030-8 217-470-033-2 217-470-034-0 217-470-035-7 217-470-036-5 217-470-043-1 217-470-044-9 217-470-045-6 217-470-046-4 217-470-047-2 217-470-048-0 217-470-049-8 217-470-050-6 217-470-051-4 217-470-052-2 217-470-053-0 217-470-054-8 217-470-055-5 217-470-056-3 217-470-057-1 217-470-058-9 217-470-059-7 217-470-060-5 217-470-061-3 217-470-062-1 217-470-063-9 217-470-064-7 $ 3.30 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 18.92 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 19.64 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.92 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 18.18 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 17.44 $ 18.18 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 13 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 217-470-065-4 217-470-066-2 217-470-067-0 217-470-068-8 217-470-069-6 217-470-070-4 217-470-071-2 217-470-072-0 217-470-073-8 217-470-074-6 217-470-075-3 217-470-076-1 217-470-077-9 217-470-078-7 217-470-079-5 217-470-080-3 217-470-081-1 217-470-082-9 217-470-083-7 217-470-087-8 217-470-088-6 217-470-089-4 217-470-090-2 217-470-091-0 217-470-092-8 217-470-093-6 217-470-094-4 217-470-095-1 217-470-096-9 217-470-097-7 217-470-098-5 217-470-099-3 217-470-100-9 217-470-101-7 217-470-105-8 217-470-106-6 217-470-107-4 217-470-108-2 217-470-109-0 217-470-112-4 217-470-114-0 217-470-115-7 217-470-116-5 217-470-117-3 217-470-118-1 217-470-119-9 217-470-120-7 217-470-121-5 217-470-124-9 217-470-125-6 217-470-126-4 217-470-128-0 217-470-129-8 217-470-130-6 217-470-132-2 217-470-133-0 217-470-134-8 217-470-135-5 217-470-136-3 217-470-137-1 220-060-012-6 220-060-019-1 220-060-020-9 220-060-022-5 220-060-023-3 220-060-024-1 220-060-029-0 220-060-030-8 220-060-031-6 220-060-039-9 220-060-042-3 220-070-012-4 220-070-013-2 220-070-014-0 220-080-035-3 220-080-037-9 220-080-038-7 220-080-040-3 220-080-041-1 220-401-013-2 220-401-014-0 220-401-015-7 220-401-016-5 220-401-017-3 220-401-018-1 220-401-019-9 220-401-020-7 220-401-021-5 220-401-022-3 220-401-023-1 220-401-024-9 220-401-025-6 220-440-010-1 220-440-011-9 220-440-012-7 220-440-013-5 220-440-014-3 220-440-015-0 220-440-016-8 220-440-017-6 220-440-018-4 220-440-019-2 220-440-020-0 220-440-023-4 220-440-024-2 220-440-025-9 220-440-026-7 220-440-027-5 220-440-030-9 220-440-031-7 220-440-032-5 220-440-033-3 220-440-034-1 220-440-035-8 220-440-036-6 220-440-037-4 220-440-038-2 220-440-039-0 220-440-040-8 220-440-041-6 220-450-010-8 220-450-011-6 220-450-012-4 220-450-013-2 220-450-014-0 220-450-015-7 220-450-016-5 220-450-017-3 220-450-018-1 220-450-019-9 220-450-020-7 220-450-021-5 220-450-022-3 220-450-023-1 220-450-024-9 220-450-025-6 220-450-026-4 220-450-027-2 220-450-028-0 220-450-029-8 220-450-030-6 220-450-031-4 220-450-032-2 220-450-033-0 220-450-034-8 220-450-035-5 220-450-036-3 220-450-037-1 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 11.86 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 7.02 $ 663.48 $ 41.72 $ 246.80 $ 43.28 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 31.46 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 31.46 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 31.46 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 31.46 $ 31.46 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 43.28 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 31.46 $ 31.46 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 14 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 220-450-038-9 220-450-039-7 220-450-040-5 220-450-041-3 220-450-042-1 220-450-043-9 220-450-044-7 220-450-045-4 220-450-046-2 220-450-047-0 220-450-048-8 220-450-049-6 220-450-050-4 220-450-051-2 220-450-052-0 220-450-053-8 220-460-028-8 220-460-029-6 220-460-030-4 220-460-031-2 220-460-032-0 220-460-033-8 220-460-034-6 220-460-035-3 220-460-036-1 220-460-037-9 220-460-038-7 220-460-039-5 220-460-040-3 220-460-041-1 220-460-042-9 220-460-043-7 220-460-044-5 220-460-045-2 220-460-046-0 220-460-047-8 220-460-048-6 220-460-049-4 220-460-050-2 220-460-051-0 220-460-052-8 220-460-053-6 220-460-054-4 220-460-055-1 220-460-056-9 220-460-057-7 220-460-058-5 220-460-059-3 220-460-060-1 220-460-061-9 220-460-062-7 220-460-063-5 220-460-064-3 220-460-065-0 220-460-066-8 220-460-067-6 220-460-069-2 220-460-070-0 220-460-071-8 220-721-001-0 220-721-002-8 220-722-001-9 220-722-002-7 220-722-003-5 220-722-004-3 220-722-005-0 220-722-006-8 220-722-007-6 220-722-008-4 220-722-009-2 220-722-010-0 220-722-011-8 220-722-012-6 220-722-013-4 220-722-014-2 220-722-015-9 220-722-016-7 220-722-017-5 220-722-018-3 220-722-019-1 220-722-020-9 220-722-021-7 220-722-022-5 220-722-023-3 220-722-024-1 220-723-001-8 220-723-002-6 220-723-003-4 220-723-004-2 220-723-005-9 220-723-006-7 220-723-007-5 220-723-008-3 220-723-009-1 220-723-010-9 220-723-011-7 220-723-012-5 220-723-013-3 220-723-014-1 220-724-003-3 220-724-004-1 220-724-005-8 220-724-006-6 220-724-007-4 220-725-001-6 220-725-002-4 220-725-003-2 220-725-004-0 220-725-005-7 220-725-006-5 220-725-007-3 220-725-008-1 220-725-009-9 220-725-010-7 220-725-011-5 220-725-012-3 220-725-013-1 220-725-014-9 220-725-015-6 220-725-016-4 220-725-017-2 220-725-018-0 220-725-019-8 220-725-020-6 220-725-021-4 220-725-022-2 220-725-023-0 220-725-024-8 220-725-025-5 220-725-026-3 220-725-027-1 220-725-028-9 220-725-029-7 220-725-030-5 220-725-031-3 220-725-032-1 220-725-033-9 220-725-034-7 220-725-035-4 220-726-001-5 220-726-002-3 220-726-003-1 220-726-004-9 220-726-005-6 220-726-006-4 220-731-001-8 220-731-002-6 220-731-003-4 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 26.24 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 20.68 $ 26.24 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 15 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 220-731-004-2 220-732-001-7 220-732-002-5 220-732-003-3 220-732-004-1 220-732-005-8 220-732-006-6 220-732-007-4 220-732-008-2 220-732-009-0 220-732-010-8 220-732-011-6 220-732-012-4 220-732-013-2 220-732-014-0 220-732-015-7 220-732-016-5 220-732-017-3 220-732-018-1 220-733-001-6 220-733-002-4 220-733-003-2 220-733-004-0 220-733-005-7 220-734-001-5 220-734-002-3 220-734-003-1 220-734-004-9 220-734-005-6 220-734-006-4 220-734-007-2 220-734-008-0 220-734-009-8 220-734-010-6 220-734-011-4 220-734-012-2 220-734-013-0 220-734-014-8 220-734-015-5 220-734-016-3 220-734-017-1 220-734-018-9 220-735-001-4 220-735-002-2 220-735-003-0 220-735-004-8 220-735-005-5 220-735-006-3 220-736-001-3 220-736-002-1 220-736-003-9 220-736-004-7 220-736-005-4 220-737-001-2 220-737-002-0 220-737-003-8 220-737-004-6 220-737-005-3 220-737-006-1 220-738-001-1 220-738-002-9 220-738-003-7 220-738-004-5 220-739-001-0 220-739-002-8 220-739-003-6 220-739-004-4 220-741-001-6 220-741-002-4 220-741-003-2 220-741-004-0 220-741-005-7 220-741-006-5 220-741-007-3 220-741-008-1 220-741-011-5 220-741-012-3 220-741-013-1 220-741-014-9 220-741-015-6 220-741-016-4 220-741-017-2 220-741-018-0 220-741-019-8 220-741-020-6 220-741-021-4 220-741-022-2 220-741-023-0 220-741-024-8 220-741-025-5 220-741-026-3 220-741-027-1 220-741-028-9 220-741-029-7 220-741-030-5 220-741-031-3 220-741-032-1 220-741-033-9 220-741-034-7 220-741-035-4 220-741-036-2 220-741-037-0 220-741-038-8 220-741-039-6 220-741-040-4 220-741-041-2 220-741-042-0 220-741-043-8 220-741-044-6 220-741-045-3 220-741-046-1 220-741-047-9 220-741-054-5 220-741-055-2 220-741-056-0 220-741-057-8 220-741-058-6 220-741-059-4 220-741-060-2 220-741-061-0 220-741-062-8 220-741-063-6 220-742-001-5 220-742-002-3 220-742-003-1 220-742-004-9 220-742-005-6 220-742-006-4 220-742-007-2 220-742-008-0 220-742-009-8 220-742-010-6 220-742-011-4 220-742-012-2 220-742-013-0 220-742-014-8 220-742-015-5 220-742-016-3 220-742-017-1 220-742-018-9 220-742-019-7 220-750-001-4 220-750-002-2 220-750-003-0 220-750-004-8 220-750-005-5 220-750-006-3 220-750-007-1 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 26.24 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 26.24 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 17.44 $ 26.24 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 16 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 220-750-008-9 220-750-009-7 220-750-010-5 220-750-011-3 220-750-012-1 220-750-013-9 220-750-014-7 220-750-015-4 220-750-016-2 220-750-017-0 220-750-018-8 220-750-019-6 220-750-020-4 220-750-021-2 220-750-022-0 220-750-023-8 220-750-024-6 220-750-025-3 220-750-026-1 220-750-027-9 220-750-028-7 220-750-029-5 220-750-030-3 220-750-031-1 220-750-032-9 220-750-033-7 220-750-034-5 220-750-035-2 220-750-036-0 220-750-037-8 220-750-038-6 220-750-039-4 220-750-040-2 220-750-041-0 220-750-042-8 220-750-043-6 220-750-044-4 220-750-045-1 220-750-046-9 220-750-047-7 220-750-048-5 220-750-049-3 220-750-050-1 220-750-051-9 220-750-052-7 220-750-053-5 220-750-054-3 220-750-055-0 220-750-056-8 220-760-001-2 220-760-002-0 220-760-003-8 220-760-004-6 220-760-005-3 220-760-006-1 220-760-007-9 220-760-008-7 220-760-009-5 220-760-010-3 220-760-011-1 220-760-012-9 220-760-013-7 220-760-014-5 220-760-015-2 220-760-016-0 220-760-017-8 220-760-018-6 220-760-019-4 220-760-020-2 220-760-021-0 220-760-022-8 220-760-023-6 220-760-024-4 220-760-025-1 220-760-026-9 220-760-027-7 220-760-028-5 220-760-029-3 220-760-030-1 220-760-031-9 220-760-032-7 220-760-033-5 220-760-034-3 220-770-001-0 220-770-002-8 220-770-003-6 220-770-004-4 220-770-005-1 220-770-006-9 220-770-007-7 220-770-008-5 220-770-009-3 220-770-010-1 220-770-011-9 220-770-012-7 220-770-013-5 220-770-014-3 220-770-015-0 220-770-016-8 220-770-017-6 220-770-018-4 220-770-019-2 220-770-020-0 220-770-021-8 220-770-022-6 220-770-023-4 220-770-024-2 220-770-025-9 220-770-026-7 220-780-001-8 220-780-002-6 220-780-003-4 220-780-004-2 220-780-005-9 220-780-006-7 220-780-007-5 220-780-008-3 220-780-009-1 220-780-010-9 220-780-011-7 220-780-012-5 220-780-013-3 220-780-014-1 220-780-015-8 220-780-016-6 220-780-017-4 220-780-018-2 220-780-019-0 220-780-020-8 220-780-021-6 220-780-022-4 220-790-001-6 220-790-002-4 220-790-003-2 220-790-004-0 220-790-005-7 220-790-006-5 220-790-007-3 220-790-008-1 220-790-009-9 220-790-010-7 220-790-011-5 220-790-012-3 220-790-013-1 220-790-014-9 220-790-015-6 220-790-016-4 220-790-017-2 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 26.24 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 31.46 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 31.46 $ 26.24 $ 31.46 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 31.46 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 17 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010 220-790-018-0 220-790-019-8 220-790-020-6 220-790-021-4 220-790-022-2 220-790-023-0 220-790-024-8 220-790-025-5 220-790-026-3 220-790-027-1 220-790-028-9 220-790-029-7 220-790-030-5 220-790-031-3 220-790-032-1 220-790-033-9 220-790-034-7 220-790-035-4 220-790-036-2 220-790-037-0 220-790-038-8 220-790-039-6 220-790-040-4 220-790-041-2 220-790-042-0 220-790-043-8 220-790-044-6 220-790-045-3 220-790-046-1 220-790-047-9 220-790-048-7 220-790-049-5 220-790-050-3 220-790-051-1 220-790-052-9 220-790-053-7 220-790-054-5 220-790-055-2 220-790-056-0 220-790-057-8 220-790-058-6 220-790-059-4 220-790-060-2 220-790-061-0 220-790-062-8 220-790-063-6 220-790-064-4 220-790-065-1 220-790-066-9 220-800-001-4 220-800-002-2 220-800-003-0 220-800-004-8 220-800-005-5 220-800-006-3 220-800-007-1 220-800-008-9 220-800-009-7 220-800-010-5 220-800-011-3 220-800-012-1 220-800-013-9 220-800-014-7 220-800-015-4 220-800-016-2 220-800-017-0 220-800-018-8 220-800-019-6 220-800-020-4 220-800-021-2 220-800-022-0 220-800-023-8 220-800-024-6 220-800-025-3 220-800-026-1 220-800-027-9 220-800-028-7 220-800-029-5 220-800-030-3 220-800-031-1 220-800-032-9 220-800-033-7 220-800-034-5 220-800-035-2 220-800-036-0 220-800-037-8 220-800-038-6 220-810-001-2 220-810-002-0 220-810-003-8 220-810-004-6 220-810-005-3 220-810-006-1 220-810-007-9 220-810-008-7 220-810-009-5 220-810-010-3 220-810-011-1 220-810-012-9 220-810-013-7 220-810-014-5 220-810-015-2 220-810-016-0 220-810-017-8 220-810-018-6 220-810-019-4 220-810-020-2 220-810-021-0 220-810-022-8 220-810-023-6 220-810-024-4 220-810-025-1 220-810-026-9 220-810-027-7 220-810-028-5 220-820-001-0 220-820-002-8 220-820-003-6 220-820-004-4 220-820-005-1 220-820-006-9 220-820-007-7 220-820-008-5 220-820-009-3 220-820-010-1 220-820-011-9 220-820-012-7 220-820-013-5 220-820-014-3 220-820-015-0 220-820-016-8 220-820-017-6 220-820-018-4 220-820-019-2 220-820-020-0 220-820-021-8 220-820-022-6 220-820-023-4 220-820-024-2 220-820-025-9 220-820-026-7 220-820-027-5 220-820-028-3 220-820-029-1 220-820-030-9 220-820-031-7 220-820-032-5 220-820-033-3 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 18 of 54 1010 1010 1010 1010A 1010A 220-820-034-1 220-820-035-8 220-820-036-6 220-820-037-4 220-820-038-2 220-820-039-0 220-820-042-4 220-820-043-2 220-820-044-0 220-820-045-7 220-820-046-5 220-820-047-3 220-820-048-1 220-820-049-9 220-820-050-7 220-820-051-5 220-820-052-3 220-820-053-1 220-820-054-9 220-820-055-6 220-820-056-4 220-820-057-2 220-820-058-0 220-820-059-8 220-820-060-6 220-820-061-4 220-820-062-2 220-820-063-0 220-820-064-8 220-820-065-5 220-820-066-3 220-820-067-1 220-820-068-9 220-820-069-7 220-820-070-5 220-830-001-8 220-830-002-6 220-830-003-4 220-830-004-2 220-830-005-9 220-830-006-7 220-830-007-5 220-830-008-3 220-830-009-1 220-830-010-9 220-830-011-7 220-830-012-5 220-830-013-3 220-830-014-1 220-830-015-8 220-830-016-6 220-830-017-4 220-830-018-2 220-830-019-0 220-830-020-8 220-830-021-6 220-830-022-4 220-830-023-2 220-830-024-0 220-830-025-7 220-830-026-5 220-830-027-3 220-830-028-1 220-830-029-9 220-830-030-7 220-830-031-5 220-830-032-3 220-830-033-1 220-830-034-9 220-830-035-6 220-830-036-4 220-830-037-2 220-840-001-6 220-840-002-4 220-840-003-2 220-840-004-0 220-840-005-7 220-840-006-5 220-840-007-3 220-840-008-1 220-840-009-9 220-840-010-7 220-840-011-5 220-840-012-3 220-840-013-1 220-090-009-6 220-090-010-4 220-341-001-0 220-341-002-8 220-341-003-6 220-341-004-4 220-341-005-1 220-341-006-9 220-341-007-7 220-341-008-5 220-341-009-3 220-341-010-1 220-341-011-9 220-341-012-7 220-341-013-5 220-341-014-3 220-341-015-0 220-341-016-8 220-341-017-6 220-341-018-4 220-342-001-9 220-342-002-7 220-342-003-5 220-342-004-3 220-342-005-0 220-342-006-8 220-342-007-6 220-342-008-4 220-342-009-2 220-343-001-8 220-343-002-6 220-343-003-4 220-343-004-2 220-343-005-9 220-343-006-7 220-343-007-5 220-343-008-3 220-343-009-1 220-343-010-9 220-343-011-7 220-343-012-5 220-343-013-3 220-343-014-1 220-343-015-8 220-343-016-6 220-343-017-4 220-343-018-2 220-343-019-0 220-343-020-8 220-343-021-6 220-343-022-4 220-343-023-2 220-343-024-0 220-343-025-7 220-343-026-5 220-343-027-3 220-343-028-1 220-343-029-9 220-343-030-7 220-343-031-5 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 18.92 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 31.46 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 22.80 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 20.68 $ 18.92 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 19.64 $ 20.68 $ 19.64 $ 31.46 $ 26.24 $ 22.80 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 26.24 $ 31.46 $ 26.24 $ 174.94 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 192.76 $ 192.76 $ 192.76 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 221.86 $ 192.76 $ 192.76 $ 192.76 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 192.76 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 192.76 $ 166.04 $ 159.90 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 192.76 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 192.76 $ 192.76 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 DA DA DA DA DA Total for DA1010 $44,999.30 Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 19 of 54 1010A 1010A 1010A 1010A 220-343-032-3 220-343-033-1 220-343-034-9 220-343-035-6 220-343-036-4 220-343-037-2 220-343-038-0 220-343-039-8 220-343-040-6 220-343-041-4 220-343-042-2 220-343-043-0 220-343-044-8 220-343-045-5 220-343-046-3 220-343-047-1 220-343-048-9 220-343-049-7 220-343-050-5 220-343-051-3 220-343-052-1 220-343-053-9 220-371-001-3 220-371-002-1 220-371-003-9 220-371-004-7 220-371-005-4 220-371-006-2 220-371-007-0 220-371-008-8 220-371-009-6 220-371-010-4 220-371-011-2 220-371-012-0 220-371-013-8 220-371-014-6 220-371-015-3 220-371-016-1 220-371-017-9 220-371-018-7 220-371-019-5 220-371-020-3 220-371-021-1 220-371-022-9 220-371-023-7 220-371-024-5 220-371-025-2 220-371-026-0 220-371-027-8 220-371-028-6 220-371-029-4 220-371-030-2 220-371-031-0 220-371-032-8 220-371-033-6 220-371-034-4 220-371-035-1 220-371-036-9 220-371-037-7 220-371-038-5 220-371-039-3 220-371-040-1 220-371-041-9 220-371-042-7 220-371-043-5 220-371-044-3 220-371-045-0 220-371-046-8 220-371-047-6 220-371-048-4 220-371-049-2 220-371-050-0 220-371-051-8 220-371-052-6 220-371-053-4 220-371-054-2 220-371-055-9 220-371-056-7 220-371-057-5 220-371-058-3 220-371-059-1 220-371-060-9 220-371-061-7 220-372-001-2 220-372-002-0 220-372-003-8 220-372-004-6 220-372-005-3 220-372-006-1 220-372-007-9 220-372-008-7 220-372-009-5 220-372-010-3 220-372-011-1 220-372-012-9 220-372-013-7 220-372-014-5 220-372-015-2 220-372-017-8 220-381-002-9 220-381-003-7 220-381-004-5 220-381-005-2 220-381-006-0 220-381-007-8 220-381-008-6 220-381-009-4 220-381-010-2 220-381-011-0 220-381-012-8 220-381-013-6 220-381-014-4 220-381-015-1 220-381-016-9 220-381-017-7 220-381-018-5 220-381-019-3 220-381-020-1 220-381-021-9 220-382-001-0 220-382-002-8 220-382-003-6 220-382-004-4 220-383-001-9 220-383-002-7 220-383-003-5 220-383-004-3 220-383-005-0 220-383-006-8 220-383-007-6 220-383-008-4 220-383-009-2 220-383-010-0 220-383-011-8 220-383-012-6 220-383-013-4 220-383-014-2 220-383-015-9 220-383-016-7 220-383-017-5 220-383-018-3 220-383-019-1 220-383-020-9 220-383-021-7 220-383-022-5 220-383-023-3 220-383-024-1 220-383-025-8 $ 166.04 $ 192.76 $ 192.76 $ 174.94 $ 159.90 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 192.76 $ 159.90 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 221.86 $ 221.86 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 221.86 $ 192.76 $ 221.86 $ 192.76 $ 192.76 $ 174.94 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 159.90 $ 174.94 $ 221.86 $ 192.76 $ 266.02 $ 192.76 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 159.90 $ 192.76 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 192.76 $ 192.76 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 192.76 $ 174.94 $ 192.76 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 159.90 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 159.90 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 192.76 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 221.86 $ 221.86 $ 192.76 $ 192.76 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 166.04 $ 174.94 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 20 of 54 1010A 520 520 520 520 220-383-026-6 033-271-001-1 033-271-002-9 033-271-003-7 033-271-004-5 033-271-005-2 033-271-006-0 033-271-007-8 033-271-008-6 033-271-009-4 033-271-010-2 033-271-011-0 033-271-012-8 033-271-013-6 033-271-014-4 033-271-015-1 033-271-016-9 033-271-017-7 033-271-018-5 033-271-019-3 033-271-020-1 033-271-021-9 033-271-022-7 033-271-023-5 033-271-024-3 033-271-025-0 033-271-026-8 033-271-027-6 033-271-028-4 033-271-029-2 033-271-030-0 033-271-031-8 033-271-032-6 033-271-033-4 033-271-034-2 033-271-035-9 033-271-036-7 033-271-037-5 033-271-038-3 033-271-039-1 033-271-040-9 033-271-041-7 033-271-042-5 033-271-043-3 033-271-044-1 033-271-045-8 033-271-046-6 033-271-047-4 033-271-048-2 033-271-049-0 033-271-050-8 033-271-051-6 033-271-052-4 033-271-053-2 033-271-054-0 033-271-055-7 033-271-056-5 033-271-057-3 033-271-058-1 033-271-059-9 033-271-060-7 033-271-061-5 033-271-062-3 033-271-063-1 033-271-064-9 033-271-065-6 033-271-066-4 033-271-067-2 033-271-068-0 033-271-069-8 033-271-070-6 033-271-071-4 033-271-072-2 033-271-073-0 033-271-074-8 033-271-075-5 033-271-076-3 033-271-077-1 033-271-078-9 033-271-079-7 033-271-080-5 033-271-081-3 033-271-082-1 033-271-083-9 033-271-084-7 033-271-085-4 033-271-086-2 033-271-087-0 033-271-088-8 033-271-089-6 033-271-090-4 033-271-091-2 033-271-092-0 033-271-093-8 033-271-094-6 033-271-095-3 033-271-096-1 033-280-001-0 033-280-002-8 033-280-003-6 033-280-004-4 033-280-005-1 033-280-006-9 033-280-007-7 033-280-008-5 033-280-009-3 033-280-010-1 033-280-011-9 033-280-012-7 033-280-013-5 033-280-014-3 033-280-015-0 033-280-016-8 033-280-017-6 033-280-018-4 033-280-019-2 033-280-020-0 033-280-021-8 033-280-022-6 033-280-023-4 033-280-024-2 033-280-025-9 033-280-026-7 033-280-027-5 033-280-028-3 033-280-029-1 033-280-030-9 033-280-031-7 033-280-032-5 033-280-033-3 033-280-034-1 033-280-035-8 033-280-036-6 033-280-037-4 033-280-038-2 033-280-039-0 033-280-040-8 033-280-041-6 033-280-042-4 033-280-043-2 033-280-044-0 033-280-045-7 033-280-046-5 033-280-047-3 033-280-048-1 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 139.70 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 151.64 $ 145.68 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 145.68 $ 145.68 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 145.68 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 139.70 $ 145.68 $ 139.70 $ 145.68 $ 151.64 $ 145.68 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 145.68 $ 145.68 $ 139.70 $ 151.64 $ 139.70 $ 139.70 $ 145.68 $ 178.48 $ 178.48 $ 145.68 $ 139.70 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 DA DA DA DA DA Total for DA1010A $34,998.58 Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 21 of 54 520 520 520 520 033-280-049-9 033-280-050-7 033-280-051-5 033-280-052-3 033-280-053-1 033-280-054-9 033-280-055-6 033-280-056-4 033-280-057-2 033-280-058-0 033-280-059-8 033-280-060-6 033-280-061-4 033-280-062-2 033-280-063-0 033-280-064-8 033-280-065-5 033-280-066-3 033-280-067-1 033-280-068-9 033-280-069-7 033-280-070-5 033-280-071-3 033-280-072-1 033-280-073-9 033-280-074-7 033-280-075-4 033-280-076-2 033-280-077-0 033-280-078-8 033-280-079-6 033-280-080-4 033-280-081-2 033-280-082-0 033-280-083-8 033-280-084-6 033-280-085-3 033-280-086-1 033-280-087-9 033-280-088-7 033-280-089-5 033-280-090-3 033-280-091-1 033-280-092-9 033-280-093-7 033-280-094-5 033-280-095-2 033-280-096-0 033-280-097-8 033-280-098-6 033-280-099-4 033-280-102-6 033-280-103-4 033-280-105-9 033-280-106-7 033-280-107-5 033-290-001-8 033-290-002-6 033-290-003-4 033-290-004-2 033-290-005-9 033-290-006-7 033-290-007-5 033-290-008-3 033-290-009-1 033-290-010-9 033-290-011-7 033-290-012-5 033-290-013-3 033-290-014-1 033-290-015-8 033-290-016-6 033-290-017-4 033-290-018-2 033-290-019-0 033-290-020-8 033-290-021-6 033-290-022-4 033-290-023-2 033-290-024-0 033-290-025-7 033-290-026-5 033-290-027-3 033-290-028-1 033-290-029-9 033-290-030-7 033-290-031-5 033-290-032-3 033-290-033-1 033-290-034-9 033-290-035-6 033-290-036-4 033-290-037-2 033-290-038-0 033-290-039-8 033-290-040-6 033-290-041-4 033-360-001-3 033-360-002-1 033-360-003-9 033-360-004-7 033-360-005-4 033-360-006-2 033-360-007-0 033-360-008-8 033-360-009-6 033-360-010-4 033-360-011-2 033-360-012-0 033-360-013-8 033-360-014-6 033-360-015-3 033-360-016-1 033-360-017-9 033-360-018-7 033-360-019-5 033-360-020-3 033-360-021-1 033-360-022-9 033-360-023-7 033-360-024-5 033-360-025-2 033-360-026-0 033-360-027-8 033-360-028-6 033-360-029-4 033-360-030-2 033-360-031-0 033-360-032-8 033-360-033-6 033-360-034-4 033-360-035-1 033-360-036-9 033-360-037-7 033-360-038-5 033-360-039-3 033-360-040-1 033-360-041-9 033-360-042-7 033-360-043-5 033-360-044-3 033-360-045-0 033-360-046-8 033-360-047-6 033-360-048-4 033-360-049-2 033-360-050-0 033-380-001-9 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 145.68 $ 145.68 $ 139.70 $ 139.70 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 145.68 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 145.68 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 145.68 $ 139.70 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 133.74 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 160.58 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 160.58 $ 133.74 $ 160.58 $ 133.74 $ 160.58 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 22 of 54 520 520 520 520 033-380-002-7 033-380-003-5 033-380-004-3 033-380-005-0 033-380-006-8 033-380-007-6 033-380-008-4 033-380-009-2 033-380-010-0 033-380-011-8 033-380-012-6 033-380-013-4 033-380-014-2 033-380-015-9 033-380-016-7 033-380-017-5 033-380-018-3 033-380-019-1 033-380-020-9 033-380-021-7 033-380-022-5 033-380-023-3 033-380-024-1 033-380-025-8 033-380-026-6 033-380-027-4 033-380-028-2 033-380-029-0 033-380-030-8 033-380-031-6 033-380-032-4 033-380-033-2 033-380-034-0 033-380-035-7 033-380-036-5 033-380-037-3 033-380-038-1 033-380-039-9 033-380-040-7 033-380-041-5 033-380-042-3 033-380-043-1 033-380-044-9 033-380-045-6 033-380-046-4 033-390-001-7 033-390-002-5 033-390-003-3 033-390-004-1 033-390-005-8 033-390-006-6 033-390-007-4 033-390-008-2 033-390-009-0 033-390-010-8 033-390-011-6 033-390-012-4 033-390-013-2 033-390-014-0 033-390-015-7 033-390-016-5 033-390-017-3 033-390-018-1 033-390-019-9 033-390-020-7 033-390-021-5 033-390-022-3 033-390-023-1 033-390-024-9 033-390-025-6 033-390-026-4 033-390-027-2 033-390-028-0 033-390-029-8 033-390-030-6 033-390-031-4 033-390-032-2 033-390-033-0 033-390-034-8 033-390-035-5 033-390-036-3 033-390-037-1 033-390-038-9 033-390-039-7 033-390-040-5 033-390-041-3 033-390-042-1 033-390-043-9 033-390-044-7 033-390-045-4 033-390-046-2 033-390-047-0 033-390-048-8 033-390-049-6 033-390-050-4 033-390-051-2 033-390-052-0 033-390-053-8 033-390-054-6 033-410-001-3 033-410-002-1 033-410-003-9 033-410-004-7 033-410-005-4 033-410-006-2 033-410-007-0 033-410-008-8 033-410-009-6 033-410-010-4 033-410-011-2 033-410-012-0 033-410-013-8 033-410-014-6 033-410-015-3 033-410-016-1 033-410-017-9 033-410-018-7 033-410-019-5 033-410-020-3 033-410-021-1 033-410-022-9 033-410-024-5 033-410-025-2 033-410-026-0 033-410-027-8 033-410-028-6 033-410-029-4 033-410-030-2 033-410-031-0 033-410-032-8 033-410-033-6 033-410-034-4 033-410-035-1 033-410-036-9 033-410-037-7 033-410-038-5 033-410-039-3 033-410-040-1 033-410-042-7 033-410-043-5 033-410-044-3 033-410-045-0 033-410-046-8 033-410-047-6 033-410-048-4 033-410-049-2 033-410-050-0 033-410-051-8 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 145.68 $ 145.68 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 145.68 $ 145.68 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 145.68 $ 151.64 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 160.58 $ 139.70 $ 133.74 $ 133.74 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 133.74 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 23 of 54 520 520 520 67A 67A 033-410-052-6 033-410-054-2 033-410-055-9 033-410-056-7 033-410-057-5 033-410-058-3 033-410-059-1 033-410-060-9 033-410-061-7 033-410-062-5 033-410-063-3 033-410-064-1 033-420-001-1 033-420-002-9 033-420-003-7 033-420-004-5 033-420-005-2 033-420-006-0 033-420-007-8 033-420-008-6 033-420-009-4 033-420-010-2 033-420-011-0 033-420-012-8 033-420-013-6 033-420-014-4 033-420-015-1 033-420-016-9 033-420-017-7 033-420-018-5 033-420-019-3 033-420-020-1 033-420-021-9 033-420-022-7 033-420-023-5 033-420-024-3 033-420-025-0 033-420-026-8 033-420-027-6 033-420-028-4 033-420-029-2 033-420-030-0 033-420-031-8 033-420-032-6 033-420-033-4 033-420-034-2 033-420-035-9 033-420-036-7 033-420-037-5 033-420-038-3 033-420-039-1 033-420-040-9 033-420-041-7 033-420-042-5 033-420-043-3 033-420-044-1 033-420-045-8 033-420-046-6 033-420-048-2 033-420-049-0 033-420-050-8 033-420-051-6 033-420-052-4 033-420-053-2 033-420-054-0 033-420-055-7 033-420-056-5 033-420-057-3 033-420-058-1 033-420-059-9 033-420-060-7 033-420-062-3 033-420-063-1 033-420-064-9 033-420-065-6 033-420-066-4 033-420-067-2 033-420-068-0 033-420-069-8 033-420-070-6 033-420-071-4 033-420-072-2 033-420-073-0 033-420-074-8 033-420-075-5 033-420-076-3 033-420-077-1 033-420-078-9 033-420-079-7 033-420-080-5 033-420-081-3 033-420-082-1 033-420-083-9 033-420-084-7 033-420-085-4 033-420-086-2 033-420-087-0 033-420-088-8 033-420-089-6 033-420-090-4 033-420-091-2 033-420-092-0 033-420-093-8 033-420-094-6 033-420-095-3 033-420-096-1 184-351-020-5 184-351-021-3 184-351-022-1 184-360-015-4 186-050-018-8 186-050-033-7 186-050-037-8 186-050-041-0 186-050-042-8 186-050-043-6 186-060-020-2 186-300-001-2 186-300-002-0 186-300-003-8 186-300-004-6 186-300-005-3 186-300-006-1 186-300-007-9 186-300-008-7 186-300-009-5 186-300-010-3 186-300-011-1 186-300-012-9 186-300-013-7 186-300-014-5 186-300-015-2 186-300-016-0 186-300-017-8 186-300-018-6 186-300-019-4 186-300-020-2 186-300-021-0 186-300-022-8 186-300-023-6 186-300-024-4 186-300-025-1 186-300-026-9 186-300-027-7 186-310-001-0 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 133.74 $ 145.68 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 139.70 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 160.58 $ 145.68 $ 24.52 $ 27.24 $ 24.52 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 DA DA DA DA DA Total for DA520 $78,000.40 Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 24 of 54 67A 67A 67A 67A 186-310-002-8 186-310-003-6 186-310-004-4 186-310-005-1 186-310-006-9 186-310-007-7 186-310-008-5 186-310-009-3 186-310-010-1 186-310-011-9 186-320-001-8 186-320-002-6 186-320-003-4 186-320-004-2 186-320-005-9 186-320-006-7 186-320-007-5 186-320-008-3 186-320-009-1 186-320-010-9 186-320-011-7 186-320-012-5 186-320-013-3 186-320-014-1 186-320-015-8 186-320-016-6 186-320-017-4 186-320-018-2 186-320-019-0 186-320-020-8 186-320-021-6 186-320-022-4 186-320-023-2 186-320-024-0 186-320-025-7 186-320-026-5 186-320-027-3 186-320-028-1 186-320-029-9 186-320-030-7 186-320-031-5 186-320-032-3 186-320-033-1 186-320-034-9 186-320-035-6 186-320-036-4 186-320-037-2 186-320-038-0 186-320-039-8 186-320-040-6 186-320-041-4 186-320-042-2 186-320-043-0 186-320-044-8 186-320-045-5 186-320-046-3 186-320-047-1 186-320-048-9 186-320-049-7 186-320-050-5 186-320-051-3 186-320-052-1 186-320-053-9 186-320-054-7 186-320-055-4 186-320-056-2 186-320-057-0 186-320-058-8 186-320-059-6 186-320-060-4 186-320-061-2 186-320-062-0 186-320-063-8 186-320-064-6 186-320-065-3 186-320-066-1 186-320-067-9 186-320-068-7 186-320-069-5 186-320-070-3 186-320-071-1 186-320-072-9 186-320-073-7 186-320-074-5 186-320-075-2 186-320-076-0 186-320-077-8 186-320-078-6 186-320-079-4 186-320-081-0 186-320-082-8 186-320-083-6 186-320-084-4 186-320-085-1 186-320-086-9 186-320-087-7 186-320-088-5 186-320-089-3 186-320-090-1 186-320-091-9 186-320-092-7 186-320-093-5 186-320-094-3 186-320-095-0 186-320-096-8 186-320-097-6 186-320-098-4 186-320-099-2 186-320-100-8 186-320-101-6 186-320-102-4 186-320-103-2 186-320-104-0 186-320-105-7 186-320-106-5 186-320-107-3 186-320-108-1 186-320-109-9 186-320-110-7 186-320-111-5 186-320-112-3 186-320-113-1 186-320-114-9 186-320-115-6 186-320-116-4 186-320-117-2 186-320-118-0 186-320-119-8 186-320-121-4 186-320-122-2 186-320-123-0 186-320-124-8 186-320-125-5 186-320-126-3 186-320-127-1 186-320-128-9 186-320-129-7 186-320-130-5 186-320-131-3 186-320-132-1 186-320-133-9 186-320-134-7 186-320-135-4 186-320-136-2 186-320-137-0 186-320-138-8 186-320-139-6 186-320-140-4 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 25 of 54 67A 67A 67A 67A 186-320-141-2 186-320-142-0 186-320-143-8 186-320-144-6 186-320-145-3 186-320-146-1 186-320-147-9 186-320-148-7 186-320-149-5 186-320-150-3 186-320-152-9 186-320-153-7 186-320-154-5 186-340-001-4 186-340-002-2 186-340-003-0 186-340-004-8 186-340-005-5 186-340-006-3 186-340-007-1 186-340-008-9 186-340-009-7 186-340-010-5 186-350-001-1 186-350-002-9 186-350-003-7 186-350-004-5 186-350-005-2 186-350-006-0 186-350-007-8 186-350-008-6 186-350-009-4 186-350-010-2 186-350-011-0 186-350-012-8 186-350-013-6 186-350-014-4 186-350-015-1 186-350-016-9 186-350-017-7 186-350-018-5 186-350-019-3 186-350-020-1 186-350-021-9 186-350-022-7 186-350-023-5 186-350-025-0 186-350-027-6 186-350-028-4 186-350-029-2 186-350-030-0 186-350-031-8 186-350-032-6 186-350-033-4 186-350-034-2 186-350-035-9 186-350-036-7 186-350-037-5 186-350-038-3 186-350-039-1 186-350-040-9 186-350-041-7 186-350-042-5 186-350-043-3 186-350-044-1 186-350-045-8 186-350-046-6 186-350-047-4 186-350-048-2 186-350-049-0 186-350-050-8 186-350-051-6 186-350-052-4 186-350-053-2 186-350-054-0 186-350-055-7 186-350-056-5 186-350-057-3 186-350-058-1 186-350-059-9 186-350-060-7 186-350-061-5 186-350-062-3 186-350-063-1 186-350-064-9 186-350-065-6 186-350-066-4 186-350-067-2 186-350-068-0 186-350-069-8 186-350-070-6 186-350-071-4 186-350-072-2 186-350-073-0 186-350-074-8 186-350-075-5 186-350-076-3 186-350-077-1 186-350-078-9 186-350-079-7 186-350-080-5 186-350-081-3 186-350-082-1 186-350-083-9 186-350-084-7 186-350-085-4 186-350-086-2 186-350-087-0 186-350-088-8 186-350-089-6 186-350-090-4 186-350-091-2 186-350-092-0 186-350-093-8 186-350-094-6 186-350-095-3 186-350-096-1 186-350-097-9 186-350-098-7 186-350-099-5 186-350-100-1 186-350-101-9 186-350-102-7 186-350-103-5 186-350-104-3 186-350-105-0 186-350-106-8 186-350-107-6 186-350-108-4 186-350-109-2 186-350-110-0 186-350-111-8 186-350-112-6 186-350-113-4 186-350-114-2 186-350-115-9 186-350-116-7 186-350-117-5 186-350-118-3 186-350-119-1 186-350-120-9 186-350-121-7 186-350-122-5 186-350-123-3 186-350-124-1 186-350-125-8 186-350-126-6 186-350-127-4 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 26 of 54 67A 67A 67A 67A 186-350-128-2 186-350-129-0 186-350-130-8 186-350-131-6 186-350-132-4 186-350-133-2 186-350-134-0 186-350-135-7 186-350-136-5 186-350-137-3 186-350-138-1 186-350-139-9 186-350-140-7 186-350-141-5 186-350-142-3 186-350-143-1 186-350-144-9 186-350-145-6 186-350-146-4 186-350-147-2 186-350-148-0 186-350-149-8 186-350-150-6 186-350-151-4 186-350-152-2 186-350-153-0 186-350-154-8 186-360-001-9 186-360-002-7 186-360-003-5 186-360-004-3 186-360-005-0 186-360-006-8 186-360-007-6 186-360-008-4 186-360-009-2 186-360-010-0 186-360-011-8 186-360-012-6 186-360-013-4 186-360-014-2 186-360-015-9 186-360-016-7 186-360-017-5 186-360-018-3 186-360-019-1 186-360-020-9 186-360-021-7 186-360-022-5 186-360-023-3 186-360-024-1 186-360-025-8 186-360-026-6 186-370-001-7 186-370-002-5 186-370-003-3 186-370-004-1 186-370-005-8 186-370-006-6 186-370-007-4 186-370-008-2 186-370-009-0 186-370-010-8 186-370-011-6 186-370-012-4 186-370-013-2 186-370-014-0 186-370-015-7 186-370-016-5 186-370-017-3 186-370-018-1 186-370-019-9 186-370-020-7 186-380-001-5 186-380-002-3 186-380-003-1 186-380-004-9 186-390-001-3 186-390-002-1 186-390-003-9 186-390-004-7 186-390-005-4 186-390-006-2 186-390-007-0 186-390-008-8 186-390-009-6 186-400-001-1 186-400-002-9 186-400-003-7 186-400-004-5 186-400-005-2 186-400-006-0 186-400-007-8 186-400-008-6 186-400-009-4 186-400-010-2 186-400-011-0 186-400-012-8 186-400-013-6 186-400-014-4 186-400-015-1 186-410-017-5 186-410-018-3 186-410-019-1 186-410-020-9 186-410-021-7 186-410-022-5 186-410-023-3 186-410-024-1 186-410-026-6 186-410-027-4 186-410-028-2 186-410-029-0 186-410-030-8 186-410-031-6 186-410-032-4 186-410-033-2 186-410-034-0 186-410-035-7 186-410-036-5 186-410-037-3 186-410-038-1 186-410-039-9 186-410-040-7 186-410-041-5 186-410-042-3 186-410-043-1 186-410-044-9 186-410-045-6 186-410-046-4 186-410-047-2 186-410-048-0 186-410-049-8 186-410-050-6 186-410-051-4 186-410-052-2 186-410-053-0 186-410-054-8 186-410-055-5 186-410-056-3 186-410-057-1 186-410-058-9 186-410-059-7 186-410-060-5 186-410-061-3 186-410-062-1 186-410-063-9 186-410-064-7 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 27 of 54 67A 67A 67A 67A 186-410-065-4 186-410-066-2 186-410-067-0 186-410-068-8 186-410-069-6 186-410-070-4 186-410-071-2 186-410-072-0 186-410-073-8 186-410-074-6 186-410-075-3 186-410-076-1 186-410-077-9 186-410-078-7 186-410-079-5 186-410-080-3 186-410-081-1 186-410-082-9 186-410-083-7 186-410-084-5 186-410-085-2 186-410-086-0 186-410-087-8 186-410-088-6 186-410-089-4 186-410-090-2 186-410-091-0 186-410-092-8 186-410-093-6 186-410-094-4 188-050-015-0 188-050-016-8 188-120-032-1 188-120-033-9 188-120-034-7 188-120-035-4 188-120-036-2 188-170-034-6 188-170-035-3 188-170-036-1 188-170-037-9 190-030-136-5 190-030-137-3 190-290-001-6 190-290-002-4 190-290-003-2 190-290-004-0 190-290-005-7 190-290-006-5 190-290-007-3 190-290-008-1 190-290-009-9 190-290-010-7 190-290-011-5 190-290-012-3 190-290-013-1 190-290-014-9 190-290-015-6 190-290-016-4 190-290-017-2 190-290-018-0 190-290-019-8 190-290-020-6 190-290-021-4 190-290-022-2 190-290-023-0 190-290-024-8 190-290-025-5 190-300-001-4 190-300-002-2 190-300-003-0 190-300-004-8 190-300-005-5 190-300-006-3 190-300-007-1 190-300-008-9 190-300-009-7 190-300-010-5 190-300-011-3 190-300-012-1 190-300-013-9 190-300-014-7 190-300-015-4 190-300-016-2 190-300-017-0 190-300-018-8 190-310-001-2 190-310-002-0 190-310-003-8 190-310-004-6 190-310-005-3 190-310-006-1 190-310-007-9 190-310-008-7 190-310-009-5 190-310-010-3 190-310-011-1 190-310-012-9 190-310-013-7 190-310-014-5 190-310-015-2 190-310-016-0 190-310-017-8 190-310-018-6 190-310-019-4 190-310-020-2 190-310-021-0 190-310-022-8 190-310-023-6 190-310-024-4 190-310-025-1 190-310-026-9 190-310-027-7 190-310-028-5 190-310-029-3 190-310-030-1 190-310-031-9 190-320-001-0 190-320-002-8 190-320-003-6 190-320-004-4 190-320-005-1 190-320-006-9 190-320-007-7 190-320-008-5 190-320-009-3 190-320-010-1 190-320-011-9 190-320-012-7 190-320-013-5 190-320-014-3 190-320-015-0 190-320-016-8 190-320-017-6 190-320-018-4 190-320-019-2 190-320-020-0 190-320-021-8 190-320-022-6 190-320-023-4 190-320-024-2 190-320-025-9 190-320-026-7 190-320-027-5 190-320-028-3 190-320-029-1 190-320-030-9 190-320-031-7 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 39.30 $ 48.80 $ 31.80 $ 39.30 $ 31.80 $ 39.30 $ 31.80 $ 39.30 $ 58.50 $ 39.30 $ 48.80 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 28 of 54 67A 67A 67A 67A 190-320-032-5 190-320-033-3 190-320-034-1 190-320-035-8 190-330-001-8 190-330-002-6 190-330-003-4 190-330-004-2 190-330-005-9 190-330-006-7 190-330-007-5 190-330-008-3 190-330-009-1 190-330-010-9 190-330-011-7 190-330-012-5 190-330-013-3 190-330-014-1 190-330-015-8 190-330-016-6 190-330-017-4 190-330-018-2 190-330-019-0 190-330-020-8 190-330-021-6 190-330-022-4 190-330-023-2 190-330-024-0 190-330-025-7 190-330-026-5 190-330-027-3 190-330-028-1 190-330-029-9 190-330-030-7 190-330-031-5 190-330-032-3 190-330-033-1 190-330-034-9 190-330-035-6 190-340-001-6 190-340-002-4 190-340-003-2 190-340-004-0 190-340-005-7 190-340-006-5 190-340-007-3 190-340-008-1 190-340-009-9 190-340-010-7 190-340-011-5 190-340-012-3 190-340-013-1 190-340-014-9 190-340-015-6 190-340-016-4 190-340-017-2 190-340-018-0 190-340-019-8 190-340-020-6 190-340-021-4 190-340-022-2 190-340-023-0 190-340-024-8 190-340-025-5 190-340-026-3 190-340-027-1 190-340-028-9 190-340-029-7 190-340-030-5 190-340-031-3 190-340-032-1 190-340-033-9 190-340-034-7 190-340-035-4 190-340-036-2 190-340-037-0 190-340-038-8 190-340-039-6 190-340-040-4 190-340-041-2 190-340-042-0 190-340-043-8 190-350-001-3 190-350-002-1 190-350-003-9 190-350-004-7 190-350-005-4 190-350-006-2 190-350-007-0 190-350-008-8 190-350-009-6 190-350-010-4 190-350-011-2 190-350-012-0 190-350-013-8 190-350-014-6 190-350-015-3 190-350-016-1 190-350-017-9 190-350-018-7 190-350-019-5 190-350-020-3 190-350-021-1 190-350-022-9 190-350-023-7 190-350-024-5 190-350-025-2 190-350-026-0 190-350-027-8 190-350-028-6 190-350-029-4 190-350-030-2 190-350-031-0 190-350-032-8 190-350-033-6 190-350-034-4 190-350-035-1 190-350-036-9 190-350-037-7 190-350-038-5 190-350-039-3 190-350-040-1 190-350-041-9 190-350-042-7 190-350-043-5 190-350-044-3 190-350-045-0 190-350-046-8 190-350-047-6 190-350-048-4 190-350-049-2 190-350-050-0 190-350-051-8 190-350-052-6 190-350-053-4 190-350-054-2 190-350-055-9 190-350-056-7 190-350-057-5 190-350-058-3 190-350-059-1 190-350-060-9 190-350-061-7 190-350-062-5 190-350-063-3 190-350-064-1 190-350-065-8 190-350-066-6 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 19.42 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 $ 24.96 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 29 of 54 67A 67A 67A 67A 190-350-067-4 190-350-068-2 190-360-001-1 190-360-002-9 190-360-003-7 190-360-004-5 190-360-005-2 190-360-006-0 190-360-007-8 190-360-008-6 190-360-009-4 190-360-010-2 190-360-011-0 190-360-012-8 190-360-013-6 190-360-014-4 190-360-015-1 190-360-016-9 190-360-017-7 190-360-018-5 190-360-019-3 190-360-020-1 190-360-021-9 190-360-022-7 190-360-023-5 190-360-024-3 190-360-025-0 190-360-026-8 190-360-027-6 190-360-028-4 190-360-029-2 190-360-030-0 190-360-031-8 190-360-032-6 190-360-033-4 190-360-034-2 190-360-035-9 190-360-036-7 190-360-037-5 190-360-038-3 190-360-039-1 190-360-040-9 190-360-041-7 190-360-042-5 190-360-043-3 190-360-044-1 190-360-045-8 190-360-046-6 190-360-047-4 190-360-048-2 190-360-049-0 190-360-050-8 190-360-051-6 190-360-052-4 190-360-053-2 190-360-054-0 190-360-055-7 190-370-001-9 190-370-002-7 190-370-003-5 190-370-004-3 190-370-005-0 190-370-006-8 190-370-007-6 190-370-008-4 190-370-009-2 190-370-010-0 190-370-011-8 190-370-012-6 190-370-013-4 190-370-014-2 190-370-015-9 190-370-016-7 190-370-017-5 190-370-018-3 190-370-019-1 190-370-020-9 190-370-021-7 190-370-022-5 190-370-023-3 190-370-024-1 190-370-025-8 190-370-026-6 190-370-027-4 190-370-028-2 190-370-029-0 190-370-030-8 190-370-031-6 190-370-032-4 190-370-033-2 190-370-034-0 190-370-035-7 190-370-036-5 190-370-037-3 190-370-038-1 190-370-039-9 190-370-040-7 190-370-041-5 190-370-042-3 190-370-043-1 190-370-044-9 190-370-045-6 190-370-046-4 190-370-047-2 190-370-048-0 190-370-049-8 190-370-050-6 190-370-051-4 190-370-052-2 190-370-053-0 190-370-054-8 190-370-055-5 190-380-007-4 190-380-010-8 190-380-011-6 190-380-012-4 190-380-013-2 190-390-016-3 190-390-017-1 190-390-019-7 190-390-020-5 190-400-001-3 190-400-002-1 190-400-003-9 190-400-004-7 190-400-005-4 190-400-006-2 190-400-007-0 190-400-008-8 190-400-009-6 190-400-010-4 190-400-011-2 190-400-012-0 190-400-013-8 190-400-014-6 190-400-015-3 190-400-016-1 190-400-017-9 190-400-018-7 190-400-019-5 190-400-020-3 190-400-021-1 190-400-022-9 190-400-023-7 190-400-024-5 190-400-025-2 190-400-026-0 190-400-027-8 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 28.98 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 27.62 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 23.14 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 21.32 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 23.14 $ 23.14 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 23.14 $ 23.14 $ 21.32 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 22.22 $ 23.14 $ 22.22 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 30 of 54 67A 67A 67A 67A 190-400-028-6 190-400-029-4 190-400-030-2 190-400-031-0 190-400-032-8 190-400-033-6 190-410-001-1 190-410-002-9 190-410-003-7 190-410-004-5 190-410-005-2 190-410-006-0 190-410-007-8 190-410-008-6 190-410-009-4 190-410-010-2 190-410-011-0 190-410-012-8 190-410-013-6 190-410-014-4 190-410-015-1 190-410-016-9 190-410-017-7 190-410-018-5 190-410-019-3 190-410-020-1 190-410-021-9 190-410-022-7 190-410-023-5 190-410-024-3 190-410-025-0 190-410-026-8 190-410-027-6 190-410-028-4 190-410-029-2 190-410-030-0 190-410-031-8 190-410-032-6 190-410-033-4 190-410-034-2 190-410-035-9 190-410-036-7 190-410-037-5 190-410-038-3 190-410-039-1 190-410-040-9 190-410-041-7 190-410-042-5 190-410-043-3 190-410-044-1 190-410-045-8 190-420-001-9 190-420-002-7 190-420-003-5 190-420-004-3 190-420-005-0 190-420-006-8 190-420-007-6 190-420-008-4 190-420-009-2 190-420-010-0 190-420-011-8 190-420-012-6 190-420-013-4 190-420-014-2 190-420-015-9 190-420-016-7 190-420-017-5 190-420-018-3 190-420-019-1 190-420-020-9 190-420-021-7 190-420-022-5 190-420-023-3 190-420-024-1 190-420-025-8 190-420-026-6 190-420-027-4 190-420-028-2 190-420-029-0 190-420-030-8 190-420-031-6 190-420-032-4 190-420-033-2 190-420-034-0 190-420-035-7 190-420-036-5 190-420-037-3 190-420-038-1 190-420-039-9 190-420-040-7 190-420-041-5 190-420-042-3 190-420-043-1 190-420-044-9 190-420-045-6 190-420-046-4 190-420-047-2 190-420-048-0 190-420-049-8 190-420-050-6 190-420-051-4 190-420-052-2 190-420-053-0 190-420-054-8 190-420-055-5 190-420-056-3 190-420-057-1 190-420-058-9 190-430-001-7 190-430-002-5 190-430-003-3 190-430-004-1 190-430-005-8 190-430-006-6 190-430-007-4 190-430-008-2 190-430-009-0 190-430-010-8 190-430-011-6 190-430-012-4 190-430-013-2 190-430-014-0 190-430-015-7 190-430-016-5 190-430-017-3 190-430-018-1 190-430-019-9 190-430-020-7 190-440-001-5 190-440-002-3 190-440-003-1 190-440-004-9 190-440-005-6 190-440-006-4 190-440-007-2 190-440-008-0 190-440-009-8 190-440-010-6 190-440-011-4 190-440-012-2 190-440-013-0 190-440-014-8 190-440-015-5 190-440-016-3 190-440-017-1 190-440-018-9 190-440-019-7 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 22.22 $ 23.14 $ 20.42 $ 23.14 $ 20.42 $ 23.14 $ 21.32 $ 24.52 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 21.32 $ 22.22 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 23.14 $ 20.42 $ 23.14 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 24.52 $ 22.22 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 21.32 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 31 of 54 67A 67A 67A 67A 190-440-020-5 190-440-021-3 190-440-022-1 190-450-001-2 190-450-002-0 190-450-003-8 190-450-004-6 190-450-005-3 190-450-006-1 190-450-007-9 190-450-008-7 190-450-009-5 190-450-010-3 190-450-011-1 190-450-012-9 190-450-013-7 190-450-014-5 190-450-015-2 190-450-016-0 190-460-001-0 190-460-002-8 190-460-003-6 190-460-004-4 190-460-005-1 190-460-006-9 190-460-007-7 190-460-008-5 190-460-009-3 190-460-010-1 190-460-011-9 190-460-012-7 190-460-013-5 190-460-014-3 190-460-015-0 190-460-016-8 190-460-017-6 190-460-018-4 190-460-019-2 190-460-020-0 190-460-021-8 190-460-022-6 190-460-023-4 190-460-024-2 190-460-025-9 190-460-026-7 190-460-027-5 190-460-028-3 190-460-029-1 190-460-030-9 190-460-031-7 190-470-001-8 190-470-002-6 190-470-003-4 190-470-004-2 190-470-005-9 190-470-006-7 190-470-007-5 190-470-008-3 190-470-009-1 190-470-010-9 190-470-011-7 190-470-012-5 190-470-013-3 190-470-014-1 190-470-015-8 190-470-016-6 190-470-017-4 190-470-018-2 190-470-019-0 190-470-020-8 190-470-021-6 190-470-022-4 190-470-023-2 190-470-024-0 190-480-001-6 190-480-002-4 190-480-003-2 190-480-004-0 190-480-005-7 190-480-006-5 190-480-007-3 190-480-008-1 190-480-009-9 190-480-010-7 190-480-011-5 190-480-012-3 190-480-013-1 190-480-014-9 190-480-015-6 190-480-016-4 190-480-017-2 190-480-018-0 190-490-001-4 190-490-002-2 190-490-003-0 190-490-004-8 190-490-005-5 190-490-006-3 190-490-007-1 190-490-008-9 190-490-009-7 190-490-010-5 190-490-011-3 190-490-012-1 190-490-013-9 190-500-001-2 190-500-002-0 190-500-003-8 190-500-004-6 190-500-005-3 190-500-006-1 190-500-007-9 190-500-008-7 190-500-009-5 190-510-001-0 190-510-002-8 190-510-003-6 190-510-004-4 190-510-005-1 190-510-006-9 190-510-007-7 190-510-008-5 190-510-009-3 190-510-010-1 190-510-011-9 190-510-012-7 190-510-013-5 190-510-014-3 190-510-015-0 190-510-016-8 190-510-017-6 190-510-018-4 190-510-019-2 190-510-020-0 190-510-021-8 190-510-022-6 190-510-023-4 190-510-024-2 190-510-025-9 190-510-026-7 190-510-027-5 190-510-028-3 190-510-029-1 190-510-030-9 190-510-031-7 190-510-032-5 190-510-033-3 190-510-034-1 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 $ 22.22 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 32 of 54 67A 75A 75A 75A 75A 190-510-035-8 190-510-036-6 190-520-001-8 190-520-002-6 190-520-003-4 190-520-004-2 190-520-005-9 190-520-006-7 190-520-007-5 190-520-008-3 190-520-009-1 190-520-010-9 190-520-011-7 190-520-012-5 190-520-013-3 191-190-006-4 191-210-008-6 191-210-009-4 191-210-010-2 213-040-082-9 213-040-083-7 213-040-084-5 213-040-089-4 213-040-090-2 213-040-094-4 213-040-095-1 213-040-098-5 213-320-006-9 213-320-007-7 213-320-009-3 213-320-010-1 213-320-011-9 213-320-012-7 213-320-013-5 213-320-014-3 213-330-001-8 213-330-002-6 213-330-003-4 213-330-004-2 213-330-005-9 213-330-006-7 213-330-007-5 213-330-008-3 213-330-009-1 213-330-010-9 213-330-011-7 213-330-012-5 213-330-013-3 213-330-014-1 213-330-015-8 213-330-016-6 213-330-017-4 213-330-018-2 213-330-019-0 213-330-020-8 213-330-021-6 213-330-022-4 213-330-023-2 213-330-024-0 213-330-025-7 213-330-026-5 213-330-027-3 213-330-028-1 213-330-029-9 213-330-030-7 213-330-031-5 213-330-032-3 213-330-033-1 213-330-034-9 213-330-035-6 213-330-036-4 213-330-037-2 213-330-038-0 213-330-039-8 213-330-040-6 213-330-041-4 213-330-042-2 213-330-043-0 213-330-044-8 213-330-045-5 213-330-046-3 213-330-047-1 213-330-048-9 213-330-049-7 213-340-001-6 213-340-002-4 213-340-003-2 213-340-004-0 213-340-005-7 213-340-006-5 213-340-007-3 213-340-008-1 213-340-009-9 213-340-010-7 213-340-011-5 213-340-012-3 213-340-013-1 213-340-014-9 213-340-015-6 213-340-016-4 213-340-017-2 213-340-018-0 213-340-019-8 213-340-020-6 213-350-001-3 213-350-002-1 213-350-003-9 213-350-004-7 213-350-005-4 213-350-006-2 213-350-007-0 213-350-008-8 213-350-009-6 213-350-010-4 213-350-011-2 213-350-013-8 213-350-014-6 213-350-015-3 213-350-017-9 213-350-018-7 213-360-001-1 213-360-002-9 213-360-003-7 213-360-004-5 213-360-005-2 213-360-006-0 213-360-007-8 213-360-008-6 213-360-009-4 213-360-010-2 213-360-011-0 213-360-012-8 213-360-013-6 213-360-014-4 213-360-015-1 213-360-016-9 213-360-017-7 213-360-018-5 213-360-019-3 213-360-020-1 213-360-021-9 213-360-022-7 213-360-023-5 213-360-024-3 213-360-025-0 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 20.42 $ 5,943.42 $ 1,953.00 $ 4,461.66 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 11.30 $ 24.68 $ 24.68 $ 24.68 $ 24.68 $ 24.68 $ 24.68 $ 24.68 $ 24.68 $ 24.68 $ 24.68 $ 24.68 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 151.46 $ 23.64 $ 27.02 $ 151.46 $ 75.72 $ 151.46 $ 151.46 $ 151.46 $ 151.46 $ 151.46 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 DA DA DA DA DA Total for DA67A $25,990.38 Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 33 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-360-026-8 213-360-027-6 213-360-028-4 213-360-029-2 213-360-030-0 213-360-031-8 213-360-032-6 213-360-033-4 213-360-034-2 213-360-035-9 213-360-036-7 213-360-037-5 213-360-038-3 213-360-039-1 213-360-040-9 213-360-041-7 213-360-042-5 213-360-043-3 213-360-044-1 213-360-045-8 213-360-046-6 213-360-047-4 213-360-048-2 213-360-049-0 213-360-050-8 213-360-051-6 213-360-052-4 213-360-053-2 213-360-054-0 213-360-055-7 213-360-056-5 213-360-057-3 213-360-058-1 213-360-059-9 213-360-060-7 213-360-061-5 213-360-062-3 213-370-009-2 213-370-011-8 213-370-012-6 213-380-001-7 213-380-003-3 213-380-005-8 213-380-008-2 213-390-001-5 213-390-002-3 213-390-003-1 213-390-004-9 213-390-005-6 213-390-006-4 213-390-007-2 213-390-008-0 213-390-009-8 213-390-010-6 213-390-011-4 213-390-012-2 213-390-013-0 213-390-014-8 213-390-015-5 213-390-016-3 213-390-017-1 213-390-018-9 213-390-019-7 213-390-020-5 213-390-026-2 213-390-028-8 213-390-029-6 213-390-030-4 213-390-031-2 213-390-034-6 213-390-035-3 213-390-037-9 213-390-038-7 213-390-039-5 213-390-041-1 213-390-042-9 213-390-043-7 213-390-044-5 213-390-045-2 213-400-001-3 213-400-002-1 213-400-003-9 213-400-004-7 213-400-005-4 213-400-006-2 213-400-007-0 213-400-008-8 213-400-009-6 213-400-010-4 213-400-011-2 213-400-012-0 213-400-013-8 213-400-014-6 213-400-015-3 213-400-016-1 213-400-017-9 213-400-018-7 213-400-019-5 213-400-020-3 213-400-021-1 213-400-022-9 213-400-023-7 213-400-024-5 213-400-025-2 213-400-026-0 213-400-027-8 213-400-028-6 213-400-029-4 213-400-030-2 213-400-031-0 213-400-032-8 213-400-033-6 213-400-034-4 213-400-035-1 213-400-036-9 213-400-037-7 213-400-038-5 213-400-039-3 213-400-040-1 213-400-041-9 213-400-042-7 213-410-001-1 213-410-002-9 213-410-003-7 213-410-004-5 213-410-005-2 213-410-006-0 213-410-007-8 213-410-008-6 213-410-009-4 213-410-010-2 213-410-011-0 213-410-012-8 213-410-013-6 213-410-014-4 213-410-015-1 213-410-016-9 213-410-017-7 213-410-018-5 213-410-019-3 213-410-020-1 213-410-021-9 213-410-022-7 213-410-023-5 213-410-024-3 213-410-025-0 213-410-026-8 213-410-027-6 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 2,972.28 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 23.20 $ 1,275.58 $ 23.20 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 21.26 $ 18.94 $ 12.42 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 34 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-410-028-4 213-410-029-2 213-410-030-0 213-410-031-8 213-410-032-6 213-410-033-4 213-410-034-2 213-410-035-9 213-410-036-7 213-410-037-5 213-410-038-3 213-410-039-1 213-410-040-9 213-410-041-7 213-410-042-5 213-410-043-3 213-410-044-1 213-410-045-8 213-410-046-6 213-410-047-4 213-410-048-2 213-410-049-0 213-410-050-8 213-410-051-6 213-410-052-4 213-410-053-2 213-410-054-0 213-410-055-7 213-410-056-5 213-410-058-1 213-410-059-9 213-410-060-7 213-410-061-5 213-410-062-3 213-410-063-1 213-410-064-9 213-410-065-6 213-410-066-4 213-410-068-0 213-420-001-9 213-420-002-7 213-420-003-5 213-420-004-3 213-420-005-0 213-420-006-8 213-420-007-6 213-420-008-4 213-420-009-2 213-420-010-0 213-420-011-8 213-420-012-6 213-420-013-4 213-420-014-2 213-420-015-9 213-420-016-7 213-420-017-5 213-420-018-3 213-420-019-1 213-420-020-9 213-420-021-7 213-420-022-5 213-420-023-3 213-420-024-1 213-420-025-8 213-420-026-6 213-420-027-4 213-420-028-2 213-420-029-0 213-420-030-8 213-420-031-6 213-420-032-4 213-420-033-2 213-420-034-0 213-420-035-7 213-420-036-5 213-420-037-3 213-420-038-1 213-420-039-9 213-420-040-7 213-420-041-5 213-420-042-3 213-420-043-1 213-430-001-7 213-430-002-5 213-430-005-8 213-430-008-2 213-430-009-0 213-430-012-4 213-430-013-2 213-430-014-0 213-430-015-7 213-430-016-5 213-430-017-3 213-430-018-1 213-430-022-3 213-430-023-1 213-430-029-8 213-430-030-6 213-430-036-3 213-430-037-1 213-430-064-5 213-430-065-2 213-430-066-0 213-430-067-8 213-430-068-6 213-430-069-4 213-430-070-2 213-430-071-0 213-430-072-8 213-430-073-6 213-430-074-4 213-430-075-1 213-430-076-9 213-430-077-7 213-430-078-5 213-430-079-3 213-430-080-1 213-430-081-9 213-430-082-7 213-430-083-5 213-430-084-3 213-430-085-0 213-430-086-8 213-430-087-6 213-430-088-4 213-430-089-2 213-430-090-0 213-430-091-8 213-430-092-6 213-430-093-4 213-430-094-2 213-430-095-9 213-430-096-7 213-430-097-5 213-430-098-3 213-430-099-1 213-430-100-7 213-430-101-5 213-430-102-3 213-430-103-1 213-430-104-9 213-430-105-6 213-430-107-2 213-430-108-0 213-430-109-8 213-430-110-6 213-430-111-4 213-430-113-0 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 27.08 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 23.20 $ 19.72 $ 27.08 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 23.20 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 33.48 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 27.08 $ 23.20 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 23.20 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 1,497.58 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 35 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-430-114-8 213-470-001-8 213-470-002-6 213-470-003-4 213-470-005-9 213-470-006-7 213-470-007-5 213-480-008-1 213-480-009-9 213-480-010-7 213-480-011-5 213-480-012-3 213-480-013-1 213-480-014-9 213-480-015-6 213-480-016-4 213-480-017-2 213-480-018-0 213-480-019-8 213-480-020-6 213-480-021-4 213-480-022-2 213-480-023-0 213-480-024-8 213-480-025-5 213-480-026-3 213-480-027-1 213-480-028-9 213-480-029-7 213-480-030-5 213-480-031-3 213-480-032-1 213-490-010-5 213-490-011-3 213-490-012-1 213-490-013-9 213-490-014-7 213-490-015-4 213-490-016-2 213-490-017-0 213-490-018-8 213-490-019-6 213-490-020-4 213-490-021-2 213-490-022-0 213-490-023-8 213-490-024-6 213-490-025-3 213-490-026-1 213-490-027-9 213-490-028-7 213-490-029-5 213-490-030-3 213-490-031-1 213-490-032-9 213-490-033-7 213-490-034-5 213-490-035-2 213-490-036-0 213-490-037-8 213-490-038-6 213-500-009-5 213-500-010-3 213-500-011-1 213-500-012-9 213-500-013-7 213-500-014-5 213-500-015-2 213-500-016-0 213-500-017-8 213-500-018-6 213-500-019-4 213-500-020-2 213-500-021-0 213-500-022-8 213-500-023-6 213-500-024-4 213-500-025-1 213-500-026-9 213-500-027-7 213-500-028-5 213-500-029-3 213-500-030-1 213-500-031-9 213-500-032-7 213-500-033-5 213-510-010-1 213-510-011-9 213-510-012-7 213-510-014-3 213-510-015-0 213-510-016-8 213-510-017-6 213-510-018-4 213-510-019-2 213-510-020-0 213-510-021-8 213-510-022-6 213-510-023-4 213-510-024-2 213-510-025-9 213-510-026-7 213-510-027-5 213-510-028-3 213-510-029-1 213-510-030-9 213-510-031-7 213-510-032-5 213-510-033-3 213-510-034-1 213-510-035-8 213-510-036-6 213-510-037-4 213-510-038-2 213-510-039-0 213-510-040-8 213-510-041-6 213-510-042-4 213-520-006-7 213-520-008-3 213-520-009-1 213-520-010-9 213-520-011-7 213-520-012-5 213-520-013-3 213-520-014-1 213-520-015-8 213-520-016-6 213-520-017-4 213-520-018-2 213-520-019-0 213-520-020-8 213-520-021-6 213-520-022-4 213-530-008-1 213-530-009-9 213-530-011-5 213-530-012-3 213-530-013-1 213-530-014-9 213-530-015-6 213-530-016-4 213-530-017-2 213-530-018-0 213-530-019-8 213-530-020-6 213-530-021-4 213-530-022-2 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 36 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-530-023-0 213-530-024-8 213-530-025-5 213-530-026-3 213-530-027-1 213-530-028-9 213-530-029-7 213-530-030-5 213-530-031-3 213-540-005-5 213-540-006-3 213-540-007-1 213-540-008-9 213-540-009-7 213-540-010-5 213-540-011-3 213-540-012-1 213-540-013-9 213-540-014-7 213-540-015-4 213-540-016-2 213-540-017-0 213-540-018-8 213-540-019-6 213-540-020-4 213-540-021-2 213-540-022-0 213-550-005-2 213-550-006-0 213-550-007-8 213-550-008-6 213-550-009-4 213-550-010-2 213-550-011-0 213-550-012-8 213-550-013-6 213-550-014-4 213-550-015-1 213-550-016-9 213-550-017-7 213-550-018-5 213-550-019-3 213-550-020-1 213-560-009-2 213-560-010-0 213-560-011-8 213-560-012-6 213-560-013-4 213-560-014-2 213-560-015-9 213-560-016-7 213-560-017-5 213-560-018-3 213-560-019-1 213-560-020-9 213-560-021-7 213-560-022-5 213-560-023-3 213-560-024-1 213-560-025-8 213-560-026-6 213-560-027-4 213-560-028-2 213-560-029-0 213-560-030-8 213-560-031-6 213-560-032-4 213-560-033-2 213-560-034-0 213-560-035-7 213-560-036-5 213-560-037-3 213-570-008-2 213-570-010-8 213-570-011-6 213-570-012-4 213-570-013-2 213-570-014-0 213-570-015-7 213-570-016-5 213-570-017-3 213-570-018-1 213-570-019-9 213-570-020-7 213-570-021-5 213-570-022-3 213-570-023-1 213-570-027-2 213-570-028-0 213-570-029-8 213-570-030-6 213-570-031-4 213-570-032-2 213-570-033-0 213-570-034-8 213-570-035-5 213-570-036-3 213-580-008-0 213-580-009-8 213-580-010-6 213-580-011-4 213-580-012-2 213-580-013-0 213-580-014-8 213-580-015-5 213-580-016-3 213-580-017-1 213-580-018-9 213-580-019-7 213-580-020-5 213-580-021-3 213-580-022-1 213-580-023-9 213-580-024-7 213-580-025-4 213-580-026-2 213-580-027-0 213-580-028-8 213-580-029-6 213-580-030-4 213-580-031-2 213-580-032-0 213-580-033-8 213-580-034-6 213-590-010-4 213-590-011-2 213-590-012-0 213-590-013-8 213-590-014-6 213-590-015-3 213-590-016-1 213-590-017-9 213-590-018-7 213-590-019-5 213-590-020-3 213-590-021-1 213-590-022-9 213-590-023-7 213-590-024-5 213-590-025-2 213-590-026-0 213-590-027-8 213-590-028-6 213-590-029-4 213-590-030-2 213-590-031-0 213-590-032-8 213-590-033-6 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 37 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-590-034-4 213-590-035-1 213-590-036-9 213-590-037-7 213-590-038-5 213-590-039-3 213-590-040-1 213-590-041-9 213-590-042-7 213-590-043-5 213-590-044-3 213-590-045-0 213-590-046-8 213-610-017-5 213-610-018-3 213-610-019-1 213-610-020-9 213-610-028-2 213-610-029-0 213-610-031-6 213-610-032-4 213-610-033-2 213-621-001-6 213-621-002-4 213-621-004-0 213-621-005-7 213-621-007-3 213-621-008-1 213-621-009-9 213-621-011-5 213-621-012-3 213-621-013-1 213-621-015-6 213-660-107-3 213-660-108-1 213-660-109-9 213-660-110-7 213-660-111-5 213-660-112-3 213-660-113-1 213-660-114-9 213-660-115-6 213-660-116-4 213-660-117-2 213-660-118-0 213-660-119-8 213-660-120-6 213-660-121-4 213-660-122-2 213-660-123-0 213-660-124-8 213-660-125-5 213-660-126-3 213-660-127-1 213-660-128-9 213-660-129-7 213-660-130-5 213-660-131-3 213-660-132-1 213-660-133-9 213-660-134-7 213-660-135-4 213-660-136-2 213-660-137-0 213-660-138-8 213-660-139-6 213-660-140-4 213-660-141-2 213-660-142-0 213-660-143-8 213-660-144-6 213-660-145-3 213-660-146-1 213-660-147-9 213-660-148-7 213-660-149-5 213-660-150-3 213-660-151-1 213-660-152-9 213-660-153-7 213-660-154-5 213-660-155-2 213-660-156-0 213-660-157-8 213-660-158-6 213-660-159-4 213-660-160-2 213-660-161-0 213-660-162-8 213-660-163-6 213-660-164-4 213-660-165-1 213-660-166-9 213-660-167-7 213-660-168-5 213-660-169-3 213-660-170-1 213-660-171-9 213-660-172-7 213-660-173-5 213-660-174-3 213-660-175-0 213-660-176-8 213-660-177-6 213-660-178-4 213-660-179-2 213-660-180-0 213-660-181-8 213-660-182-6 213-660-183-4 213-660-184-2 213-660-185-9 213-660-186-7 213-660-187-5 213-660-188-3 213-660-189-1 213-660-190-9 213-660-191-7 213-660-192-5 213-660-193-3 213-660-194-1 213-660-195-8 213-660-196-6 213-660-197-4 213-660-198-2 213-660-199-0 213-660-200-6 213-660-201-4 213-660-202-2 213-660-203-0 213-660-204-8 213-660-205-5 213-660-206-3 213-660-207-1 213-660-208-9 213-660-209-7 213-660-210-5 213-660-211-3 213-670-147-7 213-670-148-5 213-670-149-3 213-670-150-1 213-670-151-9 213-670-152-7 213-670-153-5 213-670-154-3 213-670-155-0 213-670-156-8 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 377.30 $ 525.94 $ 5,125.92 $ 221.88 $ 88.80 $ 406.00 $ 412.16 $ 463.06 $ 1,605.34 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 38 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-670-157-6 213-670-158-4 213-670-159-2 213-670-160-0 213-670-161-8 213-670-162-6 213-670-163-4 213-670-164-2 213-670-165-9 213-670-166-7 213-670-167-5 213-670-168-3 213-670-169-1 213-670-170-9 213-670-171-7 213-670-172-5 213-670-173-3 213-670-174-1 213-670-175-8 213-670-176-6 213-670-177-4 213-670-178-2 213-670-179-0 213-670-180-8 213-670-181-6 213-670-182-4 213-670-183-2 213-670-184-0 213-670-185-7 213-670-186-5 213-670-187-3 213-670-188-1 213-670-189-9 213-670-190-7 213-670-191-5 213-670-192-3 213-670-193-1 213-670-194-9 213-670-195-6 213-670-196-4 213-670-197-2 213-670-198-0 213-670-199-8 213-670-200-4 213-670-201-2 213-670-202-0 213-670-203-8 213-670-204-6 213-670-205-3 213-670-206-1 213-670-207-9 213-670-208-7 213-670-209-5 213-670-210-3 213-670-211-1 213-670-212-9 213-670-213-7 213-670-214-5 213-670-215-2 213-670-216-0 213-670-217-8 213-670-218-6 213-670-219-4 213-670-220-2 213-670-221-0 213-670-222-8 213-670-223-6 213-670-224-4 213-670-225-1 213-670-226-9 213-670-227-7 213-670-228-5 213-670-229-3 213-670-230-1 213-670-231-9 213-670-232-7 213-670-233-5 213-670-234-3 213-670-235-0 213-670-236-8 213-670-237-6 213-670-238-4 213-670-239-2 213-670-240-0 213-670-241-8 213-670-242-6 213-670-243-4 213-670-244-2 213-670-245-9 213-670-246-7 213-670-247-5 213-670-248-3 213-670-249-1 213-670-250-9 213-670-251-7 213-670-252-5 213-670-253-3 213-670-254-1 213-670-255-8 213-670-256-6 213-670-257-4 213-670-258-2 213-670-259-0 213-670-260-8 213-670-261-6 213-670-262-4 213-670-263-2 213-670-264-0 213-670-265-7 213-670-266-5 213-670-267-3 213-670-268-1 213-670-269-9 213-670-270-7 213-670-271-5 213-670-272-3 213-670-273-1 213-670-274-9 213-670-275-6 213-670-276-4 213-670-277-2 213-670-278-0 213-670-279-8 213-670-280-6 213-670-281-4 213-670-282-2 213-670-283-0 213-670-284-8 213-670-285-5 213-670-286-3 213-670-287-1 213-670-288-9 213-670-289-7 213-670-290-5 213-670-291-3 213-680-008-9 213-680-011-3 213-680-012-1 213-680-013-9 213-680-016-2 213-680-017-0 213-680-018-8 213-680-019-6 213-680-020-4 213-680-021-2 213-680-022-0 213-680-023-8 213-680-024-6 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 39 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-680-025-3 213-680-026-1 213-680-029-5 213-680-030-3 213-680-031-1 213-680-032-9 213-680-035-2 213-680-036-0 213-680-037-8 213-680-038-6 213-680-039-4 213-680-040-2 213-680-041-0 213-680-042-8 213-680-043-6 213-680-044-4 213-680-045-1 213-680-046-9 213-680-047-7 213-680-048-5 213-680-049-3 213-680-050-1 213-680-055-0 213-680-056-8 213-680-057-6 213-680-058-4 213-680-059-2 213-680-060-0 213-680-061-8 213-680-062-6 213-680-063-4 213-680-064-2 213-680-065-9 213-680-069-1 213-680-070-9 213-680-071-7 213-680-072-5 213-680-073-3 213-680-076-6 213-680-077-4 213-680-078-2 213-680-079-0 213-680-080-8 213-680-081-6 213-680-082-4 213-680-083-2 213-680-084-0 213-680-085-7 213-680-086-5 213-680-091-5 213-680-092-3 213-680-093-1 213-680-094-9 213-680-095-6 213-680-096-4 213-680-098-0 213-680-099-8 213-680-100-4 213-680-101-2 213-680-103-8 213-680-104-6 213-680-105-3 213-680-106-1 213-680-107-9 213-680-108-7 213-680-109-5 213-680-112-9 213-680-113-7 213-680-114-5 213-680-115-2 213-680-116-0 213-680-117-8 213-680-118-6 213-680-120-2 213-680-121-0 213-680-122-8 213-680-123-6 213-680-125-1 213-680-126-9 213-690-002-0 213-690-003-8 213-690-004-6 213-690-013-7 213-690-014-5 213-690-015-2 213-690-016-0 213-690-017-8 213-690-018-6 213-690-019-4 213-690-020-2 213-690-021-0 213-690-022-8 213-690-023-6 213-690-024-4 213-690-025-1 213-690-026-9 213-690-027-7 213-690-028-5 213-690-029-3 213-690-030-1 213-690-031-9 213-690-032-7 213-690-033-5 213-690-034-3 213-690-035-0 213-690-036-8 213-690-037-6 213-690-038-4 213-690-039-2 213-690-040-0 213-690-041-8 213-690-042-6 213-690-043-4 213-690-044-2 213-690-045-9 213-690-046-7 213-690-047-5 213-690-048-3 213-690-049-1 213-690-050-9 213-690-051-7 213-690-052-5 213-690-053-3 213-690-054-1 213-690-055-8 213-690-056-6 213-690-058-2 213-690-059-0 213-690-060-8 213-730-001-4 213-730-002-2 213-730-003-0 213-730-004-8 213-730-005-5 213-730-006-3 213-730-007-1 213-730-008-9 213-730-009-7 213-730-010-5 213-730-011-3 213-730-012-1 213-730-013-9 213-730-014-7 213-730-015-4 213-730-016-2 213-730-017-0 213-730-018-8 213-730-019-6 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 1,218.42 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 23.20 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 27.08 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 40 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-730-020-4 213-730-021-2 213-730-022-0 213-730-023-8 213-730-024-6 213-730-025-3 213-730-026-1 213-730-027-9 213-730-028-7 213-730-029-5 213-730-030-3 213-730-031-1 213-730-032-9 213-730-033-7 213-730-034-5 213-730-035-2 213-730-036-0 213-730-037-8 213-730-038-6 213-730-039-4 213-730-040-2 213-730-041-0 213-730-042-8 213-730-043-6 213-730-044-4 213-730-045-1 213-730-046-9 213-730-047-7 213-730-048-5 213-730-049-3 213-730-050-1 213-730-051-9 213-730-052-7 213-730-053-5 213-730-054-3 213-730-055-0 213-730-056-8 213-730-057-6 213-730-058-4 213-730-059-2 213-730-060-0 213-730-061-8 213-730-062-6 213-730-063-4 213-730-064-2 213-730-065-9 213-730-066-7 213-730-067-5 213-730-068-3 213-730-069-1 213-730-070-9 213-730-071-7 213-730-072-5 213-730-073-3 213-730-074-1 213-730-075-8 213-730-076-6 213-730-077-4 213-730-078-2 213-730-079-0 213-730-080-8 213-730-081-6 213-730-082-4 213-740-001-2 213-740-002-0 213-740-003-8 213-740-004-6 213-740-005-3 213-740-006-1 213-740-007-9 213-740-008-7 213-740-009-5 213-740-010-3 213-740-011-1 213-740-012-9 213-740-013-7 213-740-014-5 213-740-015-2 213-740-016-0 213-740-017-8 213-740-018-6 213-740-019-4 213-740-020-2 213-740-021-0 213-740-022-8 213-740-023-6 213-740-024-4 213-740-025-1 213-740-026-9 213-740-027-7 213-740-028-5 213-740-029-3 213-740-030-1 213-740-031-9 213-740-032-7 213-740-033-5 213-740-034-3 213-740-035-0 213-740-036-8 213-740-037-6 213-740-038-4 213-740-039-2 213-740-040-0 213-740-041-8 213-740-042-6 213-740-043-4 213-740-044-2 213-740-045-9 213-740-046-7 213-740-047-5 213-740-048-3 213-740-049-1 213-740-050-9 213-740-051-7 213-740-052-5 213-740-053-3 213-740-054-1 213-740-055-8 213-740-056-6 213-740-057-4 213-740-058-2 213-740-059-0 213-740-060-8 213-740-061-6 213-740-062-4 213-740-063-2 213-740-064-0 213-740-065-7 213-740-066-5 213-740-067-3 213-740-068-1 213-740-069-9 213-740-070-7 213-740-071-5 213-740-072-3 213-740-073-1 213-740-074-9 213-740-075-6 213-740-076-4 213-740-077-2 213-740-078-0 213-740-079-8 213-740-080-6 213-740-081-4 213-740-082-2 213-740-083-0 213-740-084-8 213-740-085-5 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 21.26 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 41 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-740-086-3 213-740-087-1 213-740-088-9 213-740-089-7 213-740-090-5 213-740-091-3 213-740-092-1 213-740-093-9 213-740-094-7 213-740-095-4 213-740-096-2 213-740-097-0 213-740-098-8 213-740-099-6 213-740-100-2 213-740-101-0 213-740-102-8 213-740-103-6 213-740-104-4 213-740-105-1 213-740-106-9 213-740-107-7 213-740-108-5 213-750-002-7 213-750-003-5 213-750-011-8 213-750-012-6 213-750-013-4 213-760-001-7 213-760-002-5 213-760-003-3 213-760-004-1 213-760-005-8 213-760-006-6 213-760-007-4 213-760-008-2 213-760-009-0 213-760-010-8 213-760-011-6 213-760-012-4 213-760-013-2 213-760-014-0 213-760-015-7 213-760-016-5 213-760-017-3 213-760-018-1 213-760-019-9 213-760-020-7 213-760-021-5 213-760-022-3 213-760-023-1 213-760-024-9 213-760-025-6 213-760-026-4 213-760-027-2 213-760-028-0 213-760-029-8 213-760-030-6 213-760-031-4 213-760-032-2 213-760-033-0 213-760-034-8 213-760-035-5 213-760-036-3 213-760-037-1 213-760-038-9 213-760-039-7 213-760-040-5 213-760-041-3 213-760-042-1 213-760-043-9 213-760-044-7 213-760-045-4 213-760-046-2 213-760-047-0 213-760-048-8 213-760-049-6 213-760-050-4 213-760-051-2 213-760-052-0 213-760-053-8 213-760-054-6 213-760-055-3 213-760-056-1 213-760-057-9 213-760-058-7 213-760-059-5 213-760-060-3 213-760-061-1 213-760-062-9 213-760-063-7 213-760-064-5 213-760-065-2 213-760-066-0 213-760-067-8 213-760-068-6 213-760-069-4 213-760-070-2 213-760-071-0 213-760-072-8 213-760-073-6 213-760-074-4 213-760-075-1 213-760-076-9 213-760-077-7 213-760-078-5 213-760-079-3 213-760-080-1 213-760-081-9 213-760-082-7 213-760-083-5 213-760-084-3 213-760-085-0 213-760-086-8 213-760-087-6 213-760-088-4 213-760-089-2 213-760-090-0 213-760-091-8 213-760-092-6 213-760-093-4 213-760-094-2 213-760-095-9 213-760-096-7 213-760-097-5 213-760-098-3 213-760-099-1 213-760-100-7 213-760-101-5 213-760-102-3 213-760-103-1 213-760-104-9 213-760-105-6 213-760-106-4 213-760-107-2 213-760-108-0 213-760-109-8 213-760-110-6 213-760-111-4 213-760-112-2 213-760-113-0 213-760-114-8 213-760-115-5 213-760-116-3 213-760-117-1 213-760-118-9 213-760-119-7 213-810-001-7 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 73.60 $ 73.60 $ 1,168.82 $ 2,657.06 $ 7,639.02 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 42 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-810-002-5 213-810-003-3 213-810-004-1 213-810-005-8 213-810-006-6 213-810-007-4 213-810-008-2 213-810-009-0 213-810-010-8 213-810-011-6 213-810-012-4 213-810-013-2 213-810-014-0 213-810-015-7 213-810-016-5 213-810-017-3 213-810-018-1 213-810-019-9 213-810-020-7 213-810-021-5 213-810-022-3 213-810-023-1 213-810-024-9 213-810-025-6 213-810-026-4 213-810-027-2 213-810-028-0 213-810-029-8 213-810-030-6 213-810-031-4 213-810-032-2 213-810-033-0 213-810-034-8 213-810-035-5 213-810-036-3 213-810-037-1 213-810-038-9 213-810-039-7 213-810-040-5 213-810-041-3 213-810-042-1 213-810-043-9 213-810-044-7 213-810-045-4 213-810-046-2 213-810-047-0 213-810-048-8 213-810-049-6 213-810-050-4 213-810-051-2 213-810-052-0 213-810-053-8 213-810-054-6 213-810-055-3 213-810-056-1 213-810-057-9 213-810-058-7 213-810-059-5 213-810-060-3 213-810-061-1 213-810-062-9 213-810-063-7 213-810-064-5 213-810-065-2 213-810-066-0 213-810-067-8 213-810-068-6 213-810-069-4 213-810-070-2 213-810-071-0 213-810-072-8 213-810-073-6 213-810-074-4 213-810-075-1 213-810-076-9 213-810-077-7 213-810-078-5 213-810-079-3 213-810-080-1 213-810-081-9 213-810-082-7 213-810-083-5 213-810-084-3 213-810-085-0 213-810-086-8 213-810-087-6 213-810-088-4 213-810-089-2 213-810-090-0 213-810-091-8 213-810-092-6 213-810-093-4 213-810-094-2 213-810-095-9 213-810-096-7 213-810-097-5 213-810-098-3 213-810-099-1 213-810-100-7 213-810-101-5 213-810-102-3 213-810-103-1 213-810-104-9 213-810-105-6 213-810-106-4 213-810-107-2 213-810-108-0 213-810-124-7 213-810-125-4 213-810-126-2 213-810-127-0 213-810-128-8 213-810-129-6 213-810-130-4 213-810-131-2 213-810-132-0 213-810-133-8 213-810-134-6 213-810-135-3 213-810-136-1 213-810-137-9 213-810-138-7 213-810-139-5 213-810-140-3 213-810-141-1 213-810-142-9 213-810-143-7 213-810-144-5 213-810-145-2 213-810-146-0 213-810-147-8 213-810-148-6 213-810-149-4 213-810-150-2 213-810-151-0 213-810-152-8 213-810-153-6 213-810-154-4 213-810-155-1 213-810-156-9 213-810-157-7 213-810-158-5 213-810-159-3 213-810-160-1 213-810-161-9 213-810-162-7 213-810-163-5 213-810-164-3 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 12.42 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 43 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-810-165-0 213-820-001-5 213-820-002-3 213-820-003-1 213-820-004-9 213-820-005-6 213-820-006-4 213-820-007-2 213-820-008-0 213-820-009-8 213-820-010-6 213-820-011-4 213-820-012-2 213-820-013-0 213-820-014-8 213-820-015-5 213-820-016-3 213-820-017-1 213-820-018-9 213-820-019-7 213-820-020-5 213-820-021-3 213-820-022-1 213-820-023-9 213-820-024-7 213-820-025-4 213-820-026-2 213-820-027-0 213-820-028-8 213-820-029-6 213-820-030-4 213-820-031-2 213-820-032-0 213-820-033-8 213-820-034-6 213-820-035-3 213-820-036-1 213-820-037-9 213-820-038-7 213-820-039-5 213-820-040-3 213-820-041-1 213-820-042-9 213-820-043-7 213-820-044-5 213-820-045-2 213-820-046-0 213-820-047-8 213-820-048-6 213-820-049-4 213-820-050-2 213-820-051-0 213-820-052-8 213-820-053-6 213-820-054-4 213-820-055-1 213-820-056-9 213-820-057-7 213-820-058-5 213-820-059-3 213-820-060-1 213-820-061-9 213-820-062-7 213-820-063-5 213-820-064-3 213-820-065-0 213-820-066-8 213-820-067-6 213-820-068-4 213-820-069-2 213-820-070-0 213-820-071-8 213-820-072-6 213-820-073-4 213-820-074-2 213-820-075-9 213-820-076-7 213-820-077-5 213-820-078-3 213-820-079-1 213-820-080-9 213-820-081-7 213-820-082-5 213-820-083-3 213-820-084-1 213-820-085-8 213-820-086-6 213-820-087-4 213-820-088-2 213-820-089-0 213-820-090-8 213-820-091-6 213-830-001-3 213-830-002-1 213-830-003-9 213-830-004-7 213-830-005-4 213-830-006-2 213-830-007-0 213-830-008-8 213-830-009-6 213-830-010-4 213-830-011-2 213-830-012-0 213-830-013-8 213-830-014-6 213-830-015-3 213-830-016-1 213-830-017-9 213-830-018-7 213-830-019-5 213-830-020-3 213-830-021-1 213-830-022-9 213-830-023-7 213-830-024-5 213-830-025-2 213-830-026-0 213-830-027-8 213-830-028-6 213-830-029-4 213-830-030-2 213-830-031-0 213-830-032-8 213-830-033-6 213-830-034-4 213-830-035-1 213-830-036-9 213-830-037-7 213-830-038-5 213-830-039-3 213-830-040-1 213-830-041-9 213-830-042-7 213-830-043-5 213-830-044-3 213-830-045-0 213-830-046-8 213-830-047-6 213-830-048-4 213-830-049-2 213-830-050-0 213-830-051-8 213-830-052-6 213-830-053-4 213-830-054-2 213-830-055-9 213-830-056-7 $ 17.40 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 44 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-830-057-5 213-830-058-3 213-830-059-1 213-830-060-9 213-830-061-7 213-830-062-5 213-830-063-3 213-830-064-1 213-830-065-8 213-830-066-6 213-830-067-4 213-830-068-2 213-830-069-0 213-830-070-8 213-830-071-6 213-840-001-1 213-840-008-6 213-840-009-4 213-840-011-0 213-840-012-8 213-840-013-6 213-840-014-4 213-840-015-1 213-840-016-9 213-840-017-7 213-840-018-5 213-840-019-3 213-840-020-1 213-840-021-9 213-840-022-7 213-850-001-8 213-850-002-6 213-850-003-4 213-850-004-2 213-850-005-9 213-850-006-7 213-850-007-5 213-850-010-9 213-850-011-7 213-850-012-5 213-850-013-3 213-850-014-1 213-850-015-8 213-850-016-6 213-850-017-4 213-850-018-2 213-850-019-0 213-850-020-8 213-850-021-6 213-850-022-4 213-850-023-2 213-850-024-0 213-850-025-7 213-850-026-5 213-850-027-3 213-850-028-1 213-850-029-9 213-850-030-7 213-850-031-5 213-850-032-3 213-850-033-1 213-850-034-9 213-850-035-6 213-850-036-4 213-850-037-2 213-850-038-0 213-850-039-8 213-850-040-6 213-850-041-4 213-850-042-2 213-850-043-0 213-850-044-8 213-850-045-5 213-850-046-3 213-850-047-1 213-850-048-9 213-850-049-7 213-850-050-5 213-850-051-3 213-850-052-1 213-850-053-9 213-850-054-7 213-850-055-4 213-850-056-2 213-850-057-0 213-850-058-8 213-850-059-6 213-850-060-4 213-850-061-2 213-850-062-0 213-850-063-8 213-850-064-6 213-850-065-3 213-850-066-1 213-850-067-9 213-850-068-7 213-850-069-5 213-850-070-3 213-850-071-1 213-850-072-9 213-850-073-7 213-850-074-5 213-850-075-2 213-850-076-0 213-850-077-8 213-850-078-6 213-850-079-4 213-850-080-2 213-850-081-0 213-850-082-8 213-850-083-6 213-850-085-1 213-850-086-9 213-850-087-7 213-850-088-5 213-910-001-6 213-910-002-4 213-910-003-2 213-910-004-0 213-910-005-7 213-910-006-5 213-910-007-3 213-910-008-1 213-920-001-4 213-920-002-2 213-920-003-0 213-920-004-8 213-920-005-5 213-920-006-3 213-920-007-1 213-920-008-9 213-920-009-7 213-920-010-5 213-920-011-3 213-920-012-1 213-920-013-9 213-920-014-7 213-920-015-4 213-920-016-2 213-920-017-0 213-920-018-8 213-920-019-6 213-920-020-4 213-920-021-2 213-920-022-0 213-920-023-8 213-920-024-6 213-920-025-3 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 27.62 $ 14.62 $ 11.68 $ 12.48 $ 10.36 $ 5.30 $ 8.24 $ 17.02 $ 9.58 $ 13.82 $ 5.30 $ 4.78 $ 8.24 $ 5.56 $ 18.94 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 20.88 $ 18.14 $ 19.72 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 19.72 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.94 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 19.72 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 19.72 $ 17.40 $ 19.12 $ 15.14 $ 27.88 $ 14.08 $ 14.62 $ 23.64 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 45 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 213-920-026-1 213-920-027-9 213-920-028-7 213-920-029-5 213-920-030-3 213-920-031-1 213-920-032-9 213-920-033-7 213-920-034-5 213-920-035-2 213-920-036-0 213-920-037-8 213-920-038-6 213-920-039-4 213-920-040-2 213-920-041-0 213-920-042-8 213-920-043-6 213-920-044-4 213-920-045-1 213-920-046-9 213-920-047-7 213-920-048-5 213-920-049-3 213-920-050-1 213-920-051-9 213-920-052-7 213-920-053-5 213-920-054-3 213-920-055-0 213-920-056-8 213-920-057-6 213-920-058-4 213-920-059-2 213-920-060-0 213-920-061-8 213-920-062-6 213-920-063-4 213-920-064-2 213-920-065-9 213-920-066-7 213-920-067-5 213-920-068-3 213-920-069-1 213-920-070-9 213-920-071-7 213-920-072-5 213-920-073-3 213-920-074-1 213-920-075-8 213-920-076-6 213-920-077-4 213-920-078-2 213-920-079-0 213-920-080-8 213-920-081-6 213-920-082-4 213-920-083-2 213-920-084-0 213-920-085-7 213-920-086-5 213-920-087-3 217-050-007-4 217-050-009-0 217-050-015-7 217-050-022-3 217-050-023-1 217-050-024-9 217-050-025-6 217-050-026-4 217-050-027-2 217-050-032-2 217-050-035-5 217-050-036-3 217-050-037-1 217-050-038-9 217-050-039-7 217-070-001-3 217-070-002-1 217-070-003-9 217-070-004-7 217-070-005-4 217-070-006-2 217-070-007-0 217-070-008-8 217-070-009-6 217-070-010-4 217-070-011-2 217-070-012-0 217-070-013-8 217-070-014-6 217-070-015-3 217-070-016-1 217-070-017-9 217-070-018-7 217-070-019-5 217-070-020-3 217-070-021-1 217-070-022-9 217-070-023-7 217-070-024-5 217-070-025-2 217-070-026-0 217-070-027-8 217-070-028-6 217-070-029-4 217-070-030-2 217-070-031-0 217-070-032-8 217-070-033-6 217-070-034-4 217-070-035-1 217-070-036-9 217-070-037-7 217-070-038-5 217-070-047-6 217-070-048-4 217-070-049-2 217-070-050-0 217-070-051-8 217-070-052-6 217-070-053-4 217-070-054-2 217-070-055-9 217-081-009-3 217-081-010-1 217-081-011-9 217-081-012-7 217-081-013-5 217-081-014-3 217-081-015-0 217-081-016-8 217-081-017-6 217-081-018-4 217-081-019-2 217-081-020-0 217-081-021-8 217-081-022-6 217-081-023-4 217-081-024-2 217-081-025-9 217-081-026-7 217-081-027-5 217-081-028-3 217-081-029-1 217-081-030-9 217-081-031-7 217-081-032-5 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 225.42 $ 913.12 $ 2,267.36 $ 1,885.78 $ 984.52 $ 1,025.60 $ 23.20 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.14 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 23.20 $ 27.08 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 23.20 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 23.20 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 23.20 $ 23.20 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 18.14 $ 18.94 $ 23.20 $ 27.08 $ 23.20 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 27.08 $ 27.08 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 46 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 217-081-033-3 217-081-034-1 217-081-035-8 217-081-036-6 217-081-037-4 217-081-038-2 217-081-039-0 217-081-050-7 217-081-051-5 217-081-052-3 217-081-053-1 217-081-054-9 217-081-055-6 217-081-056-4 217-081-057-2 217-081-058-0 217-081-059-8 217-081-061-4 217-081-062-2 217-081-063-0 217-081-064-8 217-081-065-5 217-081-066-3 217-081-067-1 217-081-068-9 217-082-001-9 217-082-002-7 217-082-003-5 217-082-004-3 217-082-005-0 217-082-006-8 217-082-007-6 217-082-008-4 217-091-001-8 217-091-008-3 217-091-009-1 217-091-010-9 217-091-011-7 217-091-012-5 217-091-013-3 217-091-014-1 217-091-015-8 217-091-016-6 217-091-017-4 217-091-018-2 217-091-019-0 217-091-020-8 217-091-021-6 217-091-022-4 217-091-023-2 217-091-024-0 217-091-025-7 217-091-026-5 217-091-027-3 217-092-001-7 217-092-002-5 217-092-003-3 217-092-004-1 217-092-005-8 217-092-006-6 217-092-007-4 217-092-008-2 217-092-009-0 217-092-010-8 217-093-001-6 217-093-002-4 217-093-003-2 217-093-004-0 217-093-005-7 217-093-006-5 217-093-007-3 217-093-008-1 217-093-009-9 217-093-010-7 217-093-011-5 217-101-001-6 217-101-002-4 217-101-003-2 217-101-004-0 217-101-005-7 217-101-006-5 217-101-007-3 217-101-008-1 217-101-009-9 217-101-010-7 217-101-011-5 217-102-001-5 217-102-002-3 217-102-003-1 217-102-004-9 217-102-005-6 217-102-006-4 217-102-007-2 217-102-008-0 217-102-009-8 217-102-010-6 217-102-011-4 217-102-014-8 217-102-016-3 217-102-017-1 217-102-018-9 217-102-019-7 217-102-020-5 217-102-021-3 217-102-022-1 217-102-023-9 217-102-024-7 217-102-025-4 217-102-026-2 217-103-001-4 217-103-002-2 217-103-003-0 217-103-004-8 217-103-005-5 217-103-006-3 217-103-007-1 217-103-008-9 217-103-009-7 217-103-010-5 217-103-011-3 217-111-001-4 217-111-002-2 217-111-003-0 217-111-004-8 217-111-005-5 217-111-006-3 217-111-007-1 217-111-008-9 217-111-009-7 217-111-010-5 217-112-001-3 217-112-002-1 217-112-003-9 217-112-004-7 217-112-005-4 217-112-006-2 217-112-007-0 217-112-008-8 217-112-009-6 217-112-010-4 217-112-011-2 217-113-001-2 217-113-002-0 217-113-005-3 217-113-006-1 217-113-007-9 217-113-008-7 217-114-001-1 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 23.20 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 27.08 $ 27.08 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 27.08 $ 27.08 $ 27.08 $ 23.20 $ 23.20 $ 23.20 $ 23.20 $ 23.20 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 27.08 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 23.20 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 23.20 $ 19.72 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 47 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 217-114-002-9 217-114-003-7 217-114-004-5 217-114-005-2 217-114-006-0 217-114-007-8 217-114-008-6 217-121-001-2 217-121-002-0 217-121-003-8 217-121-004-6 217-121-005-3 217-121-006-1 217-121-007-9 217-121-008-7 217-121-009-5 217-121-010-3 217-121-011-1 217-122-002-9 217-122-003-7 217-122-004-5 217-122-005-2 217-122-006-0 217-122-007-8 217-122-008-6 217-122-009-4 217-122-010-2 217-122-011-0 217-122-012-8 217-122-013-6 217-131-001-0 217-131-002-8 217-131-003-6 217-131-004-4 217-131-005-1 217-131-006-9 217-131-007-7 217-131-008-5 217-131-009-3 217-131-010-1 217-131-011-9 217-131-012-7 217-131-013-5 217-131-014-3 217-131-015-0 217-131-016-8 217-131-017-6 217-131-018-4 217-131-019-2 217-131-020-0 217-131-021-8 217-131-022-6 217-131-023-4 217-131-024-2 217-132-001-9 217-132-003-5 217-132-004-3 217-132-005-0 217-132-006-8 217-132-007-6 217-132-008-4 217-132-009-2 217-132-010-0 217-132-011-8 217-132-012-6 217-132-015-9 217-132-016-7 217-132-019-1 217-132-022-5 217-132-023-3 217-132-025-8 217-132-026-6 217-132-027-4 217-132-028-2 217-132-029-0 217-132-030-8 217-132-031-6 217-132-032-4 217-200-005-7 217-200-006-5 217-200-007-3 217-200-008-1 217-200-009-9 217-200-010-7 217-200-011-5 217-200-012-3 217-200-013-1 217-200-014-9 217-200-015-6 217-200-016-4 217-200-017-2 217-200-018-0 217-200-019-8 217-200-020-6 217-200-021-4 217-200-022-2 217-200-025-5 217-200-026-3 217-200-034-7 217-200-036-2 217-200-037-0 217-200-038-8 217-200-039-6 217-200-040-4 217-200-048-7 217-200-053-7 217-210-007-1 217-210-008-9 217-210-009-7 217-210-010-5 217-210-011-3 217-210-012-1 217-210-013-9 217-210-014-7 217-210-015-4 217-210-016-2 217-210-017-0 217-210-018-8 217-210-019-6 217-210-020-4 217-210-021-2 217-210-025-3 217-210-026-1 217-210-027-9 217-210-028-7 217-210-029-5 217-210-030-3 217-210-031-1 217-210-032-9 217-210-033-7 217-210-034-5 217-210-035-2 217-210-036-0 217-210-037-8 217-210-038-6 217-210-039-4 217-210-040-2 217-210-041-0 217-210-042-8 217-210-043-6 217-210-044-4 217-210-045-1 217-210-046-9 217-210-047-7 217-210-048-5 217-210-049-3 217-210-050-1 217-210-055-0 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 23.20 $ 23.20 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 27.08 $ 27.08 $ 23.20 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 27.08 $ 27.08 $ 23.20 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 23.20 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 23.20 $ 23.20 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 23.20 $ 18.94 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 19.72 $ 19.72 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 23.20 $ 27.08 $ 23.20 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 20.88 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 19.72 $ 18.14 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 48 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 217-210-056-8 217-210-057-6 217-210-058-4 217-210-059-2 217-210-060-0 217-210-061-8 217-210-062-6 217-210-063-4 217-210-064-2 217-210-065-9 217-210-066-7 217-210-069-1 217-210-070-9 217-210-071-7 217-210-072-5 217-210-073-3 217-210-074-1 217-210-075-8 217-210-076-6 217-210-077-4 217-210-078-2 217-210-086-5 217-210-087-3 217-210-088-1 217-210-090-7 217-210-091-5 217-210-092-3 217-210-093-1 217-210-094-9 217-210-095-6 217-210-108-7 217-220-041-8 217-220-042-6 217-220-043-4 217-220-044-2 217-220-045-9 217-220-046-7 217-220-047-5 217-220-057-4 217-220-058-2 217-220-063-2 217-220-064-0 217-220-065-7 217-220-066-5 217-220-082-2 217-220-083-0 217-220-084-8 217-220-085-5 217-220-086-3 217-220-087-1 217-220-088-9 217-220-089-7 217-220-090-5 217-220-092-1 217-220-093-9 217-220-094-7 217-220-099-6 217-220-100-2 217-220-101-0 217-220-102-8 217-220-103-6 217-220-104-4 217-220-105-1 217-220-106-9 217-220-107-7 217-220-108-5 217-220-109-3 217-220-110-1 217-220-111-9 217-220-112-7 217-220-113-5 217-220-114-3 217-220-115-0 217-220-116-8 217-220-117-6 217-220-118-4 217-220-119-2 217-220-120-0 217-220-121-8 217-220-122-6 217-220-123-4 217-220-124-2 217-220-125-9 217-220-126-7 217-220-127-5 217-220-128-3 217-220-129-1 217-220-130-9 217-220-131-7 217-220-132-5 217-220-133-3 217-220-134-1 217-220-136-6 217-220-137-4 217-220-138-2 217-220-139-0 217-220-141-6 217-220-144-0 217-220-145-7 217-220-146-5 217-220-147-3 217-220-148-1 217-220-149-9 217-220-150-7 217-220-151-5 217-220-152-3 217-220-153-1 217-220-154-9 217-220-155-6 217-220-156-4 217-220-157-2 217-220-158-0 217-220-159-8 217-220-160-6 217-220-161-4 217-220-162-2 217-220-163-0 217-230-013-5 217-230-014-3 217-230-015-0 217-230-016-8 217-230-017-6 217-230-018-4 217-230-019-2 217-230-038-2 217-230-039-0 217-230-040-8 217-230-041-6 217-230-042-4 217-230-043-2 217-230-044-0 217-230-045-7 217-230-046-5 217-230-047-3 217-230-048-1 217-230-049-9 217-230-050-7 217-230-051-5 217-230-052-3 217-230-053-1 217-230-054-9 217-230-055-6 217-230-056-4 217-230-057-2 217-230-058-0 217-230-059-8 217-230-060-6 217-230-061-4 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 18.14 $ 20.88 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.14 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 49 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 217-230-062-2 217-230-063-0 217-230-064-8 217-230-065-5 217-230-066-3 217-230-067-1 217-230-068-9 217-230-069-7 217-230-070-5 217-230-071-3 217-230-072-1 217-230-073-9 217-230-074-7 217-230-075-4 217-230-076-2 217-230-077-0 217-230-078-8 217-230-079-6 217-230-080-4 217-230-081-2 217-230-082-0 217-230-083-8 217-230-084-6 217-230-085-3 217-230-087-9 217-230-088-7 217-230-089-5 217-230-090-3 217-230-091-1 217-230-092-9 217-230-093-7 217-230-094-5 217-230-095-2 217-230-096-0 217-230-097-8 217-230-098-6 217-230-099-4 217-230-100-0 217-230-101-8 217-230-102-6 217-230-103-4 217-230-106-7 217-230-107-5 217-230-108-3 217-230-109-1 217-230-110-9 217-230-111-7 217-230-112-5 217-230-113-3 217-230-114-1 217-230-115-8 217-230-116-6 217-230-117-4 217-230-118-2 217-230-119-0 217-240-001-8 217-240-002-6 217-240-003-4 217-240-004-2 217-240-005-9 217-240-006-7 217-240-007-5 217-240-008-3 217-240-009-1 217-240-010-9 217-240-011-7 217-240-012-5 217-240-013-3 217-240-014-1 217-240-015-8 217-240-016-6 217-240-017-4 217-240-018-2 217-240-024-0 217-240-027-3 217-240-028-1 217-250-001-5 217-250-007-2 217-260-001-3 217-260-002-1 217-260-003-9 217-260-004-7 217-260-005-4 217-260-006-2 217-260-007-0 217-260-008-8 217-260-009-6 217-260-010-4 217-260-011-2 217-260-012-0 217-260-013-8 217-260-014-6 217-260-015-3 217-260-016-1 217-260-017-9 217-260-018-7 217-260-019-5 217-260-020-3 217-260-021-1 217-260-022-9 217-260-023-7 217-260-024-5 217-260-025-2 217-260-026-0 217-260-027-8 217-260-028-6 217-260-029-4 217-260-030-2 217-260-031-0 217-260-032-8 217-260-033-6 217-260-034-4 217-260-035-1 217-260-036-9 217-260-037-7 217-260-038-5 217-260-039-3 217-260-040-1 217-260-041-9 217-260-042-7 217-260-043-5 217-260-044-3 217-260-045-0 217-260-046-8 217-260-047-6 217-260-048-4 217-260-049-2 217-260-050-0 217-260-051-8 217-260-052-6 217-260-053-4 217-260-054-2 217-260-055-9 217-260-056-7 217-260-057-5 217-260-058-3 217-280-001-9 217-280-002-7 217-280-003-5 217-280-004-3 217-280-005-0 217-280-006-8 217-280-007-6 217-280-008-4 217-280-009-2 217-280-010-0 217-280-011-8 217-280-012-6 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 19.72 $ 18.94 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 18.94 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 18.14 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 17.40 $ 2,412.44 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 11.16 $ 11.16 $ 11.16 $ 11.16 $ 11.16 $ 11.16 $ 11.16 $ 11.16 $ 11.16 $ 11.16 $ 11.16 $ 11.16 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 11.88 $ 11.88 $ 11.88 $ 11.88 $ 11.88 $ 11.88 $ 11.88 $ 11.88 $ 11.88 $ 10.92 $ 10.92 $ 10.92 $ 10.92 $ 10.92 $ 10.92 $ 10.92 $ 10.92 $ 10.92 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 50 of 54 75A 75A 75A 75A 76A 217-280-013-4 217-280-014-2 217-280-015-9 217-280-016-7 217-280-017-5 217-280-018-3 217-280-019-1 217-280-020-9 217-280-021-7 217-280-022-5 217-280-023-3 217-280-024-1 217-280-025-8 217-280-026-6 217-280-027-4 217-280-028-2 217-290-001-7 217-290-002-5 217-290-003-3 217-290-004-1 217-290-005-8 217-290-006-6 217-290-007-4 217-290-008-2 217-290-009-0 217-290-010-8 217-290-011-6 217-290-012-4 217-290-013-2 217-290-014-0 217-290-015-7 217-290-016-5 217-290-017-3 217-290-018-1 217-290-019-9 217-290-020-7 217-290-021-5 217-290-022-3 217-290-023-1 217-290-024-9 217-290-025-6 217-290-026-4 217-290-027-2 217-290-028-0 217-290-029-8 217-290-030-6 217-290-031-4 217-290-032-2 217-290-033-0 217-290-034-8 217-290-035-5 217-290-036-3 217-290-037-1 217-290-038-9 217-290-039-7 217-290-040-5 217-290-041-3 217-290-042-1 217-290-043-9 217-290-044-7 217-290-045-4 217-300-001-5 217-300-002-3 217-300-003-1 217-300-004-9 217-300-005-6 217-300-006-4 217-300-007-2 217-300-008-0 217-300-009-8 217-300-010-6 217-300-011-4 217-300-012-2 217-300-013-0 217-300-014-8 217-300-015-5 217-300-016-3 217-300-017-1 217-300-018-9 217-300-019-7 217-300-020-5 217-300-021-3 217-300-022-1 217-300-023-9 217-300-024-7 217-300-025-4 217-300-026-2 217-300-027-0 217-300-028-8 217-300-029-6 217-300-030-4 217-300-031-2 217-300-032-0 217-300-033-8 217-300-034-6 217-300-035-3 217-300-036-1 217-300-037-9 217-300-038-7 217-300-039-5 217-300-040-3 217-300-041-1 217-300-042-9 217-300-043-7 217-300-044-5 217-300-045-2 217-300-046-0 217-300-047-8 217-300-048-6 217-300-049-4 217-300-050-2 217-300-051-0 217-300-052-8 217-300-053-6 217-300-054-4 217-300-055-1 217-300-056-9 217-300-057-7 187-470-001-4 187-470-002-2 187-470-003-0 187-470-004-8 187-470-005-5 187-470-006-3 187-470-007-1 187-470-008-9 187-470-009-7 187-470-010-5 187-470-011-3 187-470-012-1 187-470-013-9 187-470-014-7 187-470-015-4 187-480-009-5 187-480-010-3 187-480-016-0 187-480-018-6 187-480-020-2 187-480-021-0 187-480-026-9 187-480-028-5 187-480-031-9 187-480-032-7 187-490-001-0 187-490-002-8 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 16.54 $ 16.54 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 14.22 $ 10.82 $ 10.82 $ 10.82 $ 10.82 $ 10.82 $ 10.82 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 12.42 $ 347.90 $ 242.92 $ 291.28 $ 291.28 $ 347.90 $ 291.28 $ 400.76 $ 291.28 $ 291.28 $ 400.76 $ 347.90 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 DA DA DA DA DA Total for DA75A $95,020.94 Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 51 of 54 76A 76A 76A 76A 187-490-003-6 187-490-004-4 187-490-005-1 187-490-006-9 187-490-007-7 187-490-008-5 187-490-009-3 187-490-010-1 187-490-011-9 187-490-012-7 187-490-013-5 187-490-014-3 187-490-015-0 187-490-016-8 187-490-017-6 187-490-018-4 187-490-019-2 187-490-020-0 187-490-021-8 187-490-022-6 187-490-023-4 187-490-024-2 187-490-025-9 187-490-026-7 187-490-027-5 187-490-028-3 187-490-029-1 187-490-030-9 187-490-033-3 187-490-035-8 187-490-036-6 187-490-037-4 187-490-038-2 187-490-039-0 187-490-040-8 187-490-041-6 187-490-042-4 187-490-043-2 187-490-044-0 187-490-045-7 187-490-046-5 187-490-047-3 187-490-048-1 187-490-049-9 187-490-050-7 187-490-051-5 187-490-052-3 187-490-053-1 187-490-054-9 187-490-055-6 187-490-056-4 187-490-057-2 187-490-058-0 187-490-059-8 187-490-060-6 187-490-061-4 187-490-062-2 187-490-063-0 187-490-064-8 187-490-065-5 187-490-066-3 187-490-067-1 187-500-001-8 187-500-002-6 187-500-003-4 187-500-004-2 187-500-005-9 187-500-006-7 187-500-007-5 187-500-008-3 187-500-009-1 187-500-010-9 187-500-011-7 187-500-012-5 187-500-013-3 187-500-014-1 187-500-015-8 187-500-016-6 187-500-017-4 187-500-018-2 187-500-019-0 187-500-020-8 187-500-021-6 187-500-022-4 187-500-023-2 187-500-024-0 187-500-025-7 187-500-026-5 187-500-027-3 187-500-028-1 187-510-001-6 187-510-002-4 187-510-003-2 187-510-004-0 187-510-005-7 187-510-006-5 187-510-007-3 187-510-008-1 187-510-009-9 187-510-010-7 187-510-012-3 187-510-013-1 187-510-014-9 187-510-015-6 187-510-017-2 187-510-018-0 187-520-001-4 187-520-002-2 187-520-003-0 187-520-004-8 187-520-005-5 187-520-006-3 187-520-007-1 187-520-008-9 187-520-009-7 187-520-010-5 187-520-011-3 187-520-012-1 187-520-013-9 187-520-014-7 187-520-015-4 187-520-016-2 187-520-017-0 187-520-018-8 187-520-019-6 187-520-020-4 187-520-021-2 187-520-022-0 187-520-024-6 187-520-025-3 187-520-026-1 187-520-027-9 187-520-028-7 187-520-029-5 187-520-030-3 187-520-031-1 187-520-032-9 187-520-033-7 187-520-034-5 187-520-035-2 187-520-036-0 187-520-037-8 187-520-038-6 187-531-001-1 187-531-002-9 187-531-003-7 187-531-004-5 187-531-005-2 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 286.40 $ 291.28 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 291.28 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 347.90 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 347.90 $ 347.90 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 52 of 54 76A 76A 76A 76A 910 187-531-006-0 187-531-007-8 187-532-001-0 187-532-002-8 187-532-003-6 187-532-004-4 187-532-005-1 187-532-006-9 187-532-007-7 187-532-008-5 187-532-009-3 187-532-010-1 187-532-011-9 187-533-001-9 187-533-002-7 187-533-003-5 187-533-004-3 187-534-001-8 187-534-002-6 187-535-001-7 187-536-001-6 187-537-001-5 187-537-002-3 187-537-003-1 187-537-008-0 187-537-010-6 187-537-011-4 187-537-012-2 187-538-001-4 187-541-001-9 187-541-002-7 187-541-003-5 187-541-004-3 187-542-001-8 187-542-002-6 187-542-003-4 187-542-004-2 187-542-005-9 187-542-006-7 187-542-007-5 187-542-008-3 187-542-009-1 187-542-010-9 187-542-011-7 187-543-001-7 187-543-002-5 187-543-003-3 187-543-004-1 187-544-003-2 187-544-004-0 187-545-001-5 187-551-001-6 187-551-002-4 187-551-003-2 187-551-006-5 187-551-007-3 187-551-008-1 187-552-001-5 187-552-002-3 187-553-001-4 192-210-023-3 192-210-024-1 192-210-025-8 192-210-027-4 192-210-028-2 192-210-029-0 192-210-030-8 192-210-031-6 193-180-013-8 193-180-018-7 193-180-037-7 193-690-069-3 193-880-001-6 193-880-002-4 193-880-003-2 193-880-004-0 193-880-005-7 193-880-006-5 193-880-008-1 193-880-009-9 193-880-010-7 193-880-011-5 193-890-001-4 193-890-002-2 193-890-003-0 193-890-004-8 193-890-005-5 193-890-006-3 193-890-007-1 193-890-008-9 193-890-009-7 193-890-010-5 193-890-011-3 193-890-012-1 193-890-013-9 193-890-014-7 193-890-015-4 193-890-016-2 193-890-018-8 193-890-021-2 193-890-022-0 193-890-023-8 193-890-024-6 193-890-025-3 193-890-026-1 193-890-027-9 193-890-028-7 193-890-029-5 193-890-030-3 193-890-031-1 193-890-032-9 193-890-033-7 193-890-034-5 193-900-001-2 193-900-002-0 193-900-003-8 193-900-004-6 193-900-005-3 193-900-006-1 193-900-007-9 193-900-008-7 193-900-009-5 193-900-013-7 193-900-015-2 202-050-055-5 202-050-056-3 202-050-057-1 202-050-059-7 202-050-060-5 202-050-061-3 202-050-064-7 202-050-065-4 202-050-066-2 202-050-067-0 202-050-069-6 202-050-070-4 202-050-072-0 202-050-076-1 202-050-077-9 202-351-001-5 202-351-002-3 202-351-003-1 202-351-004-9 202-351-005-6 202-352-001-4 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 400.76 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 400.76 $ 347.90 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 347.90 $ 400.76 $ 347.90 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 347.90 $ 191.56 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 347.90 $ 347.90 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 400.76 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 291.28 $ 291.28 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 242.92 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 191.56 $ 291.28 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 105.88 $ 81.62 DA DA DA DA DA Total for DA76A $64,999.80 Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 53 of 54 910 910 910 910 202-352-002-2 202-352-003-0 202-352-004-8 202-352-005-5 202-352-006-3 202-352-007-1 202-352-008-9 202-353-001-3 202-353-002-1 202-353-003-9 202-353-004-7 202-353-005-4 202-353-006-2 202-353-007-0 202-353-008-8 202-353-009-6 202-353-010-4 202-353-011-2 202-353-012-0 202-353-013-8 202-354-001-2 202-354-002-0 202-354-003-8 202-354-004-6 202-354-005-3 202-354-006-1 202-361-001-3 202-361-002-1 202-361-003-9 202-361-004-7 202-361-007-0 202-361-008-8 202-362-001-2 202-362-002-0 202-362-003-8 202-362-004-6 202-362-005-3 202-362-006-1 202-362-007-9 202-363-001-1 202-363-002-9 202-363-003-7 202-363-004-5 202-363-005-2 202-363-006-0 202-364-001-0 202-364-002-8 202-371-001-1 202-371-002-9 202-371-003-7 202-371-004-5 202-371-005-2 202-371-008-6 202-371-009-4 202-371-010-2 202-371-011-0 202-371-012-8 202-371-016-9 202-371-017-7 202-371-018-5 202-371-020-1 202-371-021-9 202-371-022-7 202-372-001-0 202-372-002-8 202-372-003-6 202-381-001-9 202-381-002-7 202-381-003-5 202-381-004-3 202-381-005-0 202-381-006-8 202-381-007-6 202-381-008-4 202-381-009-2 202-381-010-0 202-382-001-8 202-382-002-6 202-382-003-4 202-382-004-2 202-382-005-9 202-382-006-7 202-382-007-5 202-382-008-3 202-382-009-1 202-382-010-9 202-382-011-7 202-391-001-7 202-391-002-5 202-391-003-3 202-391-004-1 202-391-005-8 202-391-006-6 202-391-007-4 202-391-008-2 202-391-009-0 202-391-010-8 202-391-011-6 202-391-012-4 202-391-013-2 202-391-014-0 202-391-015-7 202-391-016-5 202-391-017-3 202-391-018-1 202-391-019-9 202-391-020-7 202-391-021-5 202-391-022-3 202-392-001-6 202-392-002-4 202-392-003-2 202-392-004-0 202-392-005-7 202-393-001-5 202-393-002-3 202-393-003-1 202-393-004-9 202-393-005-6 202-393-006-4 202-393-007-2 202-393-008-0 202-393-009-8 202-393-010-6 202-394-002-2 202-394-003-0 202-394-004-8 202-394-005-5 202-394-006-3 202-394-007-1 202-394-008-9 202-394-009-7 202-394-010-5 202-394-011-3 202-394-012-1 202-394-013-9 202-394-016-2 202-394-017-0 202-394-018-8 202-394-019-6 202-394-020-4 202-395-001-3 202-395-002-1 202-395-003-9 202-395-004-7 202-395-005-4 202-395-006-2 202-395-007-0 $ 105.88 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 105.88 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 105.88 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 105.88 $ 90.72 $ 105.88 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 105.88 $ 105.88 $ 105.88 $ 105.88 $ 105.88 $ 105.88 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 105.88 $ 105.88 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 90.72 $ 81.62 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 90.72 $ 105.88 $ 90.72 $ 105.88 $ 105.88 $ 105.88 $ 90.72 $ 81.62 $ 90.72 $ 105.88 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 81.62 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 81.62 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 90.72 $ 105.88 $ 90.72 $ 105.88 $ 90.72 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 74.04 $ 71.00 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 77.08 $ 81.62 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 77.08 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 81.62 $ 71.00 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 71.00 $ 71.00 $ 71.00 $ 77.08 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 77.08 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 DA DA DA DA Drainage Area Benefit Assessment Proposed Fees for Lien Year 2020 06/10/20 Page 54 of 54 910 910 202-395-008-8 202-395-009-6 202-395-010-4 202-395-011-2 202-401-001-5 202-401-002-3 202-401-003-1 202-401-004-9 202-401-005-6 202-401-006-4 202-401-007-2 202-401-008-0 202-401-009-8 202-402-001-4 202-402-002-2 202-402-003-0 202-402-004-8 202-402-005-5 202-402-006-3 202-402-007-1 202-402-008-9 202-402-009-7 202-402-010-5 202-402-011-3 202-403-001-3 202-403-002-1 202-403-003-9 202-403-004-7 202-403-005-4 202-403-006-2 202-403-007-0 202-403-008-8 202-403-009-6 202-403-010-4 202-403-011-2 202-403-012-0 202-403-013-8 202-403-014-6 202-403-015-3 202-403-016-1 202-403-017-9 202-403-018-7 202-403-019-5 202-403-020-3 202-403-021-1 202-403-022-9 202-404-001-2 202-404-002-0 202-404-003-8 202-404-004-6 202-404-005-3 202-404-006-1 202-404-007-9 202-404-008-7 202-404-009-5 202-404-010-3 202-404-011-1 202-404-012-9 202-404-013-7 202-404-014-5 202-404-015-2 202-404-016-0 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 71.00 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 71.00 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 77.08 $ 77.08 $ 74.04 $ 71.00 $ 71.00 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 81.62 $ 77.08 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 71.00 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 77.08 $ 74.04 $ 71.00 $ 71.00 $ 71.00 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 $ 71.00 $ 71.00 $ 71.00 $ 81.62 $ 90.72 $ 74.04 $ 71.00 $ 74.04 $ 74.04 DA DA Total for DA910 $18,000.02 Table 1 FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 Estimated Estimated Drainage Area FY 2019/20 Assessment for FY 2019/20 FY 2020/21 Assessment for FY 2020/21 Estimated Typical Residential Proposed Total Estimated Typical Residential Proposed Total Rate Per IAU Parcel (3.05 IAU)Assessment Rate Per IAU Parcel (3.05 IAU)Assessment 67A Rossmoor 10.57$ 32.24$ 35,000.00$ 7.85$ 23.95$ 26,000.00$ 75A Canyon Lakes 6.50$ 19.84$ 80,188.83$ 7.70$ 23.50$ 95,000.00$ 76A Bogue Ranch 52.04$ 158.74$ 80,400.00$ 42.08$ 128.33$ 65,000.00$ 520 Laurel Basin 73.34$ 223.69$ 92,000.00$ 62.18$ 189.65$ 78,000.00$ 910 Rassier Ranch 43.70$ 133.30$ 30,000.00$ 26.22$ 79.98$ 18,000.00$ 1010 Bettencourt 5.89$ 17.98$ 65,000.00$ 4.08$ 12.45$ 45,000.00$ 1010A Shadow Creek 39.65$ 120.93$ 40,500.00$ 34.26$ 104.51$ 35,000.00$ RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Flood Control District), or designee, to execute the Wetlands Restoration for Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Grant Agreement Number Q1996042 between the Flood Control District and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) in an amount not to exceed $950,000 to provide partial implementation funding for the Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project, for the period of July 1, 2020, or upon Grantor approval, whichever is later, to December 31, 2022, Martinez area. FISCAL IMPACT: The Grant Agreement provides $950,000 in CDFW GHG funds. The total project includes matching funds totaling $17 million funded by the US Environmental Protection Agency (9%), the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority (41%), the Wildlife Conservation Board (7%), the State Department of Water Resources (8%), the National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Fund (6%), the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (8%), CDFW Prop 1/68 (8%), and the Flood Control District (7%). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Paul Detjens, (925) 313-2394 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Paul Detjens, Flood Control, Trevor McGuire, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control C. 6 To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Lower Walnut Creek — California Department of Fish and Wildlife Wetland Restoration for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Grant. Project No. 7520-6B8285 BACKGROUND: On September 10, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved the Flood Control District’s application to CDFW for $950,000 for the Lower Walnut Creek Restoration project. The CDFW’s 2019 Wetlands Restoration for GHG Reduction Grant Program is part of California Climate Investments, a statewide program that puts billions of Cap-and-Trade dollars to work reducing GHG emissions, strengthening the economy, and improving public health and the environment — particularly in disadvantaged communities, low-income communities, and low-income households. CDFW selected seven projects for funding, including Lower Walnut Creek, for a total of $11.35 million. CDFW subsequently presented the Flood Control District with the Grant Agreement for signature. CDFW requires the Flood Control District execute the agreement in order to finalize the grant. The agreement requires the Flood Control District to indemnify the State of California for third party claims caused by the County in performing the grant agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without Board approval, the Flood Control District will be unable to accept the $950,000 CDFW grant. RECOMMENDATION(S): As the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District), APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or designee, to execute a maintenance agreement, with the Town of Danville (Town), related to accepting maintenance responsibilities for a portion of the West Branch of West Alamo Creek, in Drainage Area 1010, in the Danville area. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or designee, to accept, on behalf of the FC District, an easement that the Town will grant the FC District under Section 3 of the maintenance agreement, and to cause said easement to be recorded in the Official Records of the Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder. DETERMINE that the activity is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Article 5, Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, and DIRECT the Director of the Department of Conservation and Development to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk, and APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Michelle Cordis, (925) 313-2381 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Ave Brown, Environmental Services, Alex Nattkemper, Environmental, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Michelle Cordis, Flood Control, Teri E. Rie, Flood Control, Bradley Olazo, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control, Chris Lau, Maintenance, Mike Giles, Maintenance, Jocelyn LaRocque, Maintenance, Jason Quinones, Maintenance, Beth Balita, Finance, Jessica Dillingham, Real Estate C. 7 To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Creek Maintenance Agreement with Town of Danville, Project No. 7580-6D8286 RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, or designee, to arrange for payment of a $25 fee to the Department of Conservation and Development for processing and a $50 fee to the County Clerk for filing the Notice of Exemption. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated annual maintenance budget for the creek is $10,000 and is funded by an assessment on the adjacent privately-owned properties. BACKGROUND: In 1988, the FC District agreed to take on maintenance of this section of the creek through establishment of Drainage Area 1010, which created an assessment on property owners in the area for maintenance of the creek and other facilities within the Drainage Area. After completion of the initial creek improvements and in 1997, the Town adopted Resolution No. 6-97 to authorize the transfer of real property containing the creek from the Town to the FC District. The parcels were not immediately transferred at that time because of new and continuing creek work that the Town needed to complete prior to the FC District accepting the parcels. That work was concluded in 1999, but the real estate transactions were not completed. Since 2009, the FC District has been discussing with the Town the limits and responsibilities of maintenance. In 2020, both parties have finally agreed to the maintenance terms set forth in the attached Agreement, which no longer includes transferring the parcels in fee. Section 3 of the Agreement requires the Town to convey an easement to the FC District, which the FC District will cause to be recorded. The Agreement will be signed concurrently with recording of an easement allowing the FC District legal access onto the parcels. Staff recommends approving this Agreement to formalize the maintenance responsibilities and locations of the FC District and the Town within this creek. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Agreement is not approved and executed, the FC District will not be obligated to perform maintenance within the area described. ATTACHMENTS Maint. Agreement CEQA RECOMMENDATION(S): DENY claims filed by Lida Behnam, et al., Katia Nicole Berberi, Matthew Berberi, Francisco Galvez, GEICO a subrogee of Yolanda Sims, USW Local 5, Michelle Wong, and James L. Young. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Lida Behnam, et al.: Personal injury claim for indemnification in undisclosed amount. Katia Nicole Berberi: Personal injury claim for damages arising out of autopsy in the amount of $500,000. Matthew Berberi: Personal injury claim for damages arising out of autopsy in the amount of $500,000. Francisco Galvez: Property claim for damage to vehicle arising out of motor vehicle accident in an amount pending. GEICO a subrogee of Yolanda Sims: Property claim for damage to vehicle arising out of motor vehicle accident in the amount of $686.90 USW Local 5: Property claim for damage to personal property arising out of motor vehicle accident in undisclosed amount. Michelle APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Scott Selby 925.335.1400 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 8 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Claims BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Wong: Property claim for damage to vehicle arising out of motor vehicle accident in undisclosed amount. James L. Young: Property claim for damage to vehicle in the amount of $236.50. RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT Board members meeting reports for May 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Government Code section 53232.3(d) requires that members of legislative bodies report on meetings attended for which there has been expense reimbursement (mileage, meals, lodging ex cetera). The attached reports were submitted by the Board of Supervisors members in satisfaction of this requirement. District V has nothing to report. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Board of Supervisors will not be in compliance with Government Code 53232.3(d). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Joellen Bergamini 925.335.1906 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 9 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:ACCEPT Board members meeting reports for May 2020 ATTACHMENTS District II May 2020 Report District III May 2020 Report District IV May 2020 Report Supervisor Candace Andersen – Monthly Meeting Report May 2020 Date Meeting Location 1 SR Mayor Meeting Zoom conference 4 CC Health Supervisors briefing call conference call 4-8 Staff meeting daily Zoom conference 4 SWAT Zoom Meeting 5 Moraga Rotary Zoom Meeting 6 CCCERA Zoom Meeting 6 Lafayette Town Hall Zoom Meeting 6 Public Works conference call 7 Covid AdHoc Zoom Meeting 7 Covid Testing Press Conf Concord 7 Mayors Conf Zoom Meeting 8 San Ramon Mayor Meeting Zoom Meeting 11-15 Staff meeting daily Zoom Meeting 12 Board Of Supervisors Meeting Zoom Meeting 13 Joint Meet w Danville/San Ramon Zoom meeting 14 Covid Ad Hoc Zoom Meeting 15 SR Mayor Meeting Zoom Meeting 18-22 Staff Meeting Daily Zoom Meeting 18 Alamo Liason Zoom Meeting 18 Special Districts Zoom meeting 19 Constituent meeting Zoom meeting 21 East Bay EDA Zoom Meeting 21 Covid Adhoc Zoom Meeting 21 ABAG Finance Zoom Meeting 22 San Ramon Mayor Meeting Zoom Meeting 26-29 Staff Meeting Daily Zoom Meeting 26 Board of Supervisors Zoom Meeting 27 Applicant Interview Zoom Meeting 28 Constituent meeting Zoom Meeting 28 Covid AdHoc Zoom Meeting 28 CCCSWA BOD Zoom Meeting 29 San Ramon Mayors meeting Zoom Meeting Date Meeting Name Location 1-May Meeting with Health Services Via Phone 1-May Family Justice Center Meeting Web Meeting 1-May Meeting with Susan Kim, Family Justice Center Via Phone 4-May Meeting with Health Services Via Phone 4-May CSAC Regional Coronavirus Update Via Phone 5-May Meeting with Department of Conservation and Development, Water Agency Via Phone 5-May Constituent Meeting Via Phone 6-May Meeting with Health Services Via Phone 6-May Mental Health Commission Meeting Web Meeting 7-May Meeting with Supervisor Glover and Lavonna Martinez frim Homeless Services Via Phone 8-May Meeting with Health Services Via Phone 11-May Meeting with Health Services Via Phone 11-May CSAC Regional Coronavirus Update Via Phone 12-May Board of Supervisors Meeting Web Meeting 13-May Meeting with Chief Helmick, ECCFPD and County Administrator, David Twa Via Phone 13-May Judge/Panelist for Saint Mary's Final Projects Presentations Web Meeting 14-May East County Water Management Association Meeting Via Phone 14-May Transplan Meeting Via Phone 15-May Meeting with Health Services Via Phone 16-May Pre-Fire Season Planning Town Hall on Marsh Creek Web Meeting 18-May Meeting with Health Services Via Phone 18-May 2020 Census Meeting Web Meeting 18-May CSAC Regional Coronavirus Update Via Phone 19-May Meeting with County Administrator, David Twa Via Phone 19-May Contra Costa Senior Center and Community Based Organizations Town Hall Web Meeting 20-May Meeting with Health Services Via Phone 21-May Panelist for PG&E Town Hall Via Phone 21-May Meeting with Iron Workers Local 378 Via Phone 21-May 2020 Census Meeting with Cities, Towns and Special Districts Web Meeting 21-May Delta Protection Commission Meeting Web Meeting 22-May Meeting with Health Services Via Phone Supervisor Diane Burgis - May 2020 AB1234 Report (Government Code Section 53232.3(d) requires that members legislative bodies report on meetings attended for which there has been expense reimbursement (mileage, meals, lodging, etc). 22-May Meeting with Housing Authority Director, Joseph Villareal Via Phone 22-May Meeting with San Luis Obispo County Supervisor, Bruce Gibson Via Phone 26-May Board of Supervisors Meeting Web Meeting 26-May Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Meeting Web Meeting 27-May Tri Delta Transit Meeting Via Phone 28-May Meeting with Senator Glazer Via Phone 28-May Panelist with the League of Women Voters of Diablo Valley Web Meeting 29-May Meeting with Health Services Via Phone 29-May Delta Counties Coalition Meeting Via Phone * Reimbursement may come from an agency other than Contra Costa County Purpose Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Community Outreach Meeting Meeting Meeting Community Outreach Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Community Outreach Meeting Community Outreach Meeting Community Outreach Meeting Meeting Supervisor Diane Burgis - May 2020 AB1234 Report (Government Code Section 53232.3(d) requires that members legislative bodies report on meetings attended for which there has been expense reimbursement (mileage, meals, lodging, etc). Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Meeting Community Outreach Meeting Meeting * Reimbursement may come from an agency other than Contra Costa County Supervisor Karen Mitchoff May 2020 DATE MEETING NAME LOCATION PURPOSE 05/12/20 Board of Supervisors Meeting Martinez Decisions on agenda items 05/26/20 Board of Supervisors Meeting Martinez Decisions on agenda items APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Colleen Awad Isenberg, 925-521-7100 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 10 To:Board of Supervisors From:Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, Chair & Supervisor John Gioia, Vice Chair Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Declaring June 2020, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Questioning (LGBTQ) Pride Month in Contra Costa County ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2020/165 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2020/165 Declaring June 2020, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Questioning (LGBTQ) Pride Month in Contra Costa County the month of June was chosen for LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer/questioning) Pride Month to commemorate the rise of the LGBTQ civil rights movement that grew out of spontaneous civil rights demonstrations by members of the LGBTQ community against unjust police raids that took place in New York City at the end of June 1969, known as the Stonewall Riots; and Whereas, former President Obama designated the Stonewall Inn as a National Monument in 2016 because of the role it played in the struggle for LGBTQ acceptance in the U.S., the Stonewall Riots inspires LGBTQ people, not only in the U.S., but throughout the world in the struggle for civil rights; and Whereas, Contra Costa Health Services, Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and the Behavioral Health Division through the work of the LGBT Pride Initiative received the prestigious national designation of Leader in Healthcare Equality for the past five years, and again in 2019 by the Human Rights Campaign, the largest LGBTQ advocacy organization in the United States; and Whereas, Contra Costa Health Services identified the need for a specialty clinic to serve the transgender community and started the first Gender Clinic in October 2016, the only clinic for transgender care between Oakland and Sacramento; and Whereas, research shows that 2-7% of all adults are lesbian, gay or bisexual and through The Family Acceptance Project at SFSU research shows that families, parents, caregivers and guardians can have a very dramatic impact on the well-being of their LGBTQ youth demonstrating family and community acceptance promotes health and protects LGBTQ young people against risk; and Whereas, more same-sex families are identifying themselves to the US Census in 2010 placing Contra Costa County 15th in the state’s 58 counties with the most same-sex couples per capita; and Whereas, the Rainbow Community Center (RCC) is the only organization in Contra Costa County that is solely focused on serving the LGBTQ community with priorities to build services for LGBTQ youth, seniors, people living with HIV/AIDS and to develop community building efforts that will diminish the sense of isolation and promote greater acceptance of all LGBTQ people; and Whereas, Contra Costa County’s LGBTQ service partners include the County's Pride Initiative, Rainbow Community Center, RYSE Center, Center for Human Development, Gender Spectrum, El Cerrito High School James Morehouse Project, Oakland/East Bay Gay Men's Chorus, Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays Oakland/East Bay Gay Men's Chorus, Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays Oakland/East Bay Gay Men's Chorus, Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG), Queer Alliances Contra Costa, Mt. Diablo Peace and Justice Center, and the Welcoming Churches coalition, and Whereas, in Contra Costa County, LGBTQ community residents, employees, businesses, and organizations have made and continue to make, great and lasting contributions adding to the rich diversity of this County; and Whereas, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors supports and promotes inclusion, non-discrimination, and equality among all County residents; that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County declares the month of June 2020 as LGBTQ Pride Month in Contra Costa County and encourages a safe and accepting environment for all members of the community. ___________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN Chair, District II Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA DIANE BURGIS Chair, District I Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT the following individual, Duane Burlison, to the Appointee 4 seat on the Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District Fire Advisory Commission for the remainder of the four-year term with an expiration date of December 31, 2021. Duane Burlison - Crockett, CA 94525 FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District Advisory Commission reviews and advises on annual operations and capital budgets; reviews Fire District expenditures; advises the Fire Chief on district service matters; and serves as a liaison between the Board of Supervisors and the community served by the fire district. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dominic Aliano 925-608-4200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 11 To:Board of Supervisors From:Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointment to the Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District Advisory Commission RECOMMENDATION(S): The Advisory Committee requests replacement of Member Keegan for excessive absenteeism. FISCAL IMPACT: NA BACKGROUND: On May 18, 2020, this item was considered by the Family and Human Services Committee on May 18, 2020. The Committee voted unanimously to approve the recommendation. At the meeting on January 21, 2020, the IHSS Public Authority Advisory Committee voted to recommend to BOS to have Consumer member Keegan Duncan replaced because of absenteeism from scheduled committee meetings. The member has not been communicating even though all the meeting materials are sent to him. Per the by-laws the members can vote to recommend to the BOS, replacement of a committee member for missing a total of four scheduled meetings annually. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elizabeth Dondi; 3-6671 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 12 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:DECLARE a vacancy for a seat on the IHSS Public Authority Advisory Committee BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On December 6, 2011 the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2011/497 adopting policy governing appointments to boards, committees, and commissions that are advisory to the Board of Supervisors. Included in this resolution was a requirement that applications for at large/countywide seats be reviewed by the Board of Supervisors sub-committee. The Board established the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) Public Authority Advisory Committee in March 1998. In April 1999, the Board of Supervisors accepted and approved the IHSS Public Authority Implementation Team Findings and Recommendations, including recommendations regarding Advisory Committee membership criteria. In March 2001, the Board approved amendments to the membership criteria. As amended, the Advisory Committee consists of 11 members: 4 Consumers aged 60 or older, 2 Consumers aged under 60, and one member from each Supervisorial District. Under Board policy, the F&HS would typically review only general membership or “At-Large” seats, and would not review appointments to supervisorial district seats. However, when the Advisory Committee was originally established, the Board of Supervisors directed that the F&HS review and coordinate supervisorial district appointments to ensure that none of the following categories has more than one representative: senior advocate, advocate for younger disabled, representative from the developmental disability community, IHSS individual provider, IHSS family provider, social worker, nurse, community-based organization, home health agency. Terms of appointment are four years. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: IHSS consumers will have reduced representation without this declaration of vacancy and recruitment for a new member. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: NA AGENDA ATTACHMENTS IHSS PA Advisory Committee Removal Motion on 1-21-2020 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Vacancy Notice 1 New Business: Members discussed about recommending to Board of Supervisors the replacement of member Keegan Duncan due to lack of attending 4 scheduled meetings last year. Members requested to see Mr. Duncan’s attendance report and staff shared the report. After a quick discussion, Wendell Snyder Moved, Wilson Cheng seconded to recommend to the BOS to replace Keegan Duncan on the IHSS Public Authority Advisory Committee. The motion carried; see votes below: To remove Keegan D uncan from Any Age Seat 4 Yes No Absent Abstain 1 Mustafa Alsalihy X 2 Sydney Anderson X 3 David Boots X 4 Wilson Cheng X 5 Keegan Duncan X 6 Michelle Hernandez X 7 Joe Juarez X 8 John Roe X 9 Wendell Snyder X RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Nancy Leasure to At Large #8 seat with a term expiring September 30, 2020 on the Advisory Council on Aging. FISCAL IMPACT: NA BACKGROUND: This item was considered by the Family and Human Services Committee on May 18, 2020. The Committee voted unanimously to approve the recommendation. There are currently 29 seats filled on the Advisory Council on Aging and 11 vacancies. These vacant seats include: Local Committee Pinole, Lafayette, Pittsburg, San Ramon, San Pablo, Martinez, Moraga, Orinda and Concord, and Member-At-Large seats #1, #4 and #8 seat. This recommended appointment will bring the membership to 30, leaving 10 seats vacant: Seat Title Term Expiration Date Current Incumbent Incumbent Supervisor District BoS Appointment Date Number Meetings Attended Since Appointment Date Total Number of Meetings Held Since Appointment APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anthony Macias, 925.602.4175 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 13 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointment to the Advisory Council on Aging BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Nutrition Project Council 9/30/2018 Garrett Gail I 10/25/2016 25 30 At-Large 1 9/30/2018 II At-Large 2 9/30/2018 Krohn Shirley IV 10/25/2016 25 26 At-Large 3 9/30/2019 Thompson Kathie IV 10/22/2019 1 1 At-Large 4 9/30/2018 V At-Large 5 9/30/2018 Card Deborah V 10/9/2018 24 26 At-Large 6 9/30/2018 Lipson Steve I 12/11/2018 8 8 At-Large 7 9/30/2019 Selleck Summer IV 10/9/2018 10 17 At-Large 8 9/30/2019 At-Large 9 9/30/2019 Richards Gerald V 10/22/2019 1 1 At-Large 10 9/30/2018 Terri Tobey II 6/18/2019 5 5 At-Large 11 9/30/2019 Bhambra Jagjit V 11/7/2017 13 16 At-Large 12 9/30/2018 Neemuchwalla Nuru IV 10/25/2016 23 26 At-Large 13 9/30/2018 Dunne-Rose Mary D II 10/25/2016 23 26 At-Large 14 9/30/2019 Yee Dennis IV 10/9/2018 8 9 At-Large 15 9/30/2019 Bruns Mary IV 10/17/2017 15 18 At-Large 16 9/30/2019 O'Toole Brian IV 10/9/2018 9 10 At-Large 17 9/30/2018 Donovan Kevin D. II 10/9/2018 8 10 At-Large 18 9/30/2018 Nahm Richard III 10/25/2016 18 22 At-Large 19 9/30/2019 Kleiner Jill II 12/11/2018 8 9 At-Large 20 9/30/2019 Frederick Susan I 10/17/2017 17 17 Local Committee Lafayette 9/30/2019 Erin Partridge II 02/11/2020 Local Committee Orinda 9/30/2019 Local Committee Antioch 9/30/2018 Fernandez Rudy III 9/13/2016 26 28 Local Committee Pleasant Hill 9/30/2019 Van Ackern Lorna IV 10/17/2017 15 17 Local Committee Pinole 9/30/2018 Local Committee Concord 9/30/2018 Local Committee Richmond 9/30/2018 Frances Smith I 5/7/2019 5 6 Local Committee El Cerrito 9/30/2018 Kim-Selby Joanna I 9/13/2016 20 28 Local Committee Hercules 9/30/2018 Doran Jennifer V 4/18/2017 21 22 Local Committee Pittsburg 9/30/2019 Local Committee San Ramon 9/30/2018 II Local Committee Clayton 9/30/2019 Tervelt Ron IV 10/17/2017 13 17 Local Committee Alamo-Danville 9/30/2018 Donnelly James II 10/17/2017 15 17 Local Committee Walnut Creek 9/30/2019 Napoli, Frank IV 3/19/2019 6 7 Local Committee Moraga 9/30/2019 Local Committee San Pablo 9/30/2018 Local Committee Martinez 9/30/2018 Local Committee Brentwood 9/30/2019 Kee Arthur III 10/17/2017 16 17 Local Committee Oakley 9/30/2018 Syrett Michael III 11/5/2019 1 1 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to make this appointment would reduce community input to the Advisory Council on Aging CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: NA RECOMMENDATION(S): REAPPOINT candidates seeking re-appointment to the following board seats: • Workforce Business Seat #1 - Michael McGill • Governmental & Economic & Community Development Seat #1 - Carol Asch APPOINT candidates seeking appointment to vacant board seats: • Workforce Business Seat #3 - Yolanda Vega APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Donna Van Wert; 925.671.4514 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 14 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointment to the Workforce Development Board RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) • Governmental & Economic & Community Development Seat #3 - Kwame Reed FISCAL IMPACT: NA BACKGROUND: This item was considered by the Family and Human Services Committee on May 18, 2020. The Committee voted unanimously to approve the recommendations. Compared to predecessor legislation, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) substantially changes Local Board composition by reducing local workforce development board size while maintaining a business and industry majority and ensuring representation from labor and employment and training organizations. Two local board candidates are seeking re-appointment for the following board seats: • Workforce Business Seat #1 - Michael McGill - Approved on February 4, 2020 at the Full Board Meeting • Governmental & Economic & Community Development Seat #1 - Carol Asch – Approved on February 4, 2020 at the Full Board Meeting The following candidates are seeking appointment to vacant board seats: • Workforce Business Seat #3 - Yolanda Vega – Approved on February 4, 2020 at the Full Board Meeting • Governmental & Economic & Community Development Seat #3 - Kwame Reed – Approved on February 4, 2020 at the Full Board Meeting **No other candidate competed for the Workforce Business Seat #1 & #3 and Governmental & Economic & Community Development Seat #1 & #3** CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to seat Workforce Development Board members reduces community input. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: NA ATTACHMENTS Roster of WDB Members McGill Application Asch Application Vega Application Reed Application D1a 3/5/2020 BOARD MEMBERS PUBLIC ROSTER District # (Resident)Re-Apply District # (Employment)Committee Michael McGill 1 3/29/2016 District #2 6/30/2020 YES Chairperson/Engineer MMS Design Associates District #2 EXEC/YOUTH Joshua Aldrich 2 10/9/2018 District #3 6/30/2022 CEO Del Sol NRG. Inc.District #3 BED Vacant 3 6/30/20XX Terry Curley 4 10/9/2018 District #2 6/30/2022 Executiv Vice President United Business Bank District #4 BED Bhupen B. Amin 5 3/29/2016 District #4 6/30/2020 NO Chief Operating Officer & Counsel Lotus Hotels & Investments District #4 EXEC Jose Carrascal 6 3/29/2016 District #3 6/30/2020 Unknown Production Leader The Dow Chemical Company District #5 EXEC/YOUTH Jason Cox 7 3/29/2016 District #4 6/30/2020 RESIGNED Manager, Rolling Div. Maintenance USS-POSCO Industries District #5 EXEC Ashley Georgian 8 3/29/2016 Plesanton, CA 6/30/2020 NO Director, Government Affairs John Muir Health District #4 EXEC/BED Robert Muller 9 3/12/2019 District #5 6/30/2023 Learning Manager PBF Energy District #5 YOUTH Robert Rivera 10 3/29/2016 District #4 6/30/2020 NO Vice President of Sales The Staffing Solutions District #5 BED Justin Steele 11 3/29/2016 Berkeley, CA 6/30/2020 NO Human Resources Manager Chevron Richmond Refinery District #1 EXEC/BED Romina Gonzalez 12 3/12/2019 District#4 6/30/2023 Publlic Relations Dolan's Lumber Doors & Windows District #4 N/A Melissa Johnson-Scranton 13 3/13/2018 Oakland, CA 6/30/2022 RESIGNED Assistant Medical Group Administrator Kaiser Permanente District #4 BED Re-Apply Thomas Hansen 1 10/17/2017 6/30/2021 Business Manager IBEW Local 302 District #5 N/A Joshua Anijar 2 12/10/2019 6/30/2023 Executive Director Centra Labor Council Contra Costa County District #5 EXEC Steve Older 3 3/29/2016 District #4 6/30/2020 Unknown Registered Apprentiship/Area Director Intl. Assoc. of Machinist & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, District 190 District #5 BED Vacant 4 6/30/20XX Vacant 5 6/30/20XX Re-Apply G. Vittoria Abbate 1 10/17/2017 District #2 6/30/2021 Director, College & Career & Adult Education Mt. Diablo Unified School District District #4 YOUTH Fred Wood 2 3/12/2019 Davis, CA 6/30/2023 RESIGNED Chancellor Contra Costa Community College District District #1 N/A Re-Apply Kristin Connelly 1 3/29/2016 District #2 6/30/2020 NO Economic & Community Dev./President & CEO East Bay Leadership Council District #4 BED Richard Johnson 2 3/29/2016 District #4 6/30/2020 YES Employment Service/Employment Prog.Manager ll California Employment Development Department District #4 BED Carol Asch 3 3/29/2016 6/30/2020 YES Rehabilitation Act of 1973/District Administrator California Department of Rehabilitation District #4 YOUTH Re-Apply Yolanda Vega 1 3/29/2016 Distrtict #2 6/30/2020 YES Principal Peak Performance Corporate Training District #2 BED John Montagh 2 6/6/2017 6/30/2021 Economic Development & Housing Manager City of Concord District # 4 BED BUSINESS COMMITTEE WORKFORCE & LABOR Exec EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE EDUCATION AND TRAINING BED BUSINESS ECONOMIC & DEV. GOVERNMENTAL AND ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Youth YOUTH COMMITTEE FLEX ADDITIONAL MEMBERS N/A NOT ASSIGNED PENDING APPROVAL/CONFIRMATION VACANT SEAT TERM END DATE Entity Name Seat #Appointment Date Term End Date Title Entity Name Seat #Appointment Date Term End Date Title Entity Name Seat #Appointment Date Term End Date Title Entity Name Seat #Appointment Date Term End Date Title EntityNameSeat #Appointment Date Term End Date Title A1b A1a A1d Submit Date: Dec 18, 2019 First Name Middle Initial Last Name Home Address Suite or Apt City State Postal Code Primary Phone Email Address Contra Costa County Boards & Commissions Application Form Profile Which supervisorial district do you live in? District 5 Education Select the option that applies to your high school education * High School Dipoloma College/ University A Name of College Attended Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Degree Type / Course of Study / Major BS - City and Regional Planning Degree Awarded? Yes No College/ University B Name of College Attended Degree Type / Course of Study / Major Kwame P Reed Business: Kwame P Reed Page 1 of 4 A1c Degree Awarded? Yes No College/ University C Name of College Attended Degree Type / Course of Study / Major Degree Awarded? Yes No Other schools / training completed: Course Studied Hours Completed Certificate Awarded? Yes No Board and Interest Which Boards would you like to apply for? Workforce Development Board: Submitted Seat Name Economic Development Rep Have you ever attended a meeting of the advisory board for which you are applying? Yes No If you have attended, how many meetings have you attended? 1 Please explain why you would like to serve on this particular board, commitee, or commission. As the Economic Development Director for the City of Antioch, my primary role is to encourage and assist company and job growth in the city. With Antioch being the 2nd largest city in the County, the ability to work with this board on strengthening our workforce will improve the entire East Contra Costa County region. I have worked very closely with WDBCC staff over the past 4-5 years. Kwame P Reed Page 2 of 4 Upload a Resume Qualifications and Volunteer Experience I would like to be considered for appointment to other advisory boards for which I may be qualified. Yes No Are you currently or have you ever been appointed to a Contra Costa County advisory board, commission, or committee? Yes No List any volunteer or cummunity experience, including any advisory boards on which you have served. Describe your qualifications for this appointment. (NOTE: you may also include a copy of your resume with this application) Please see resume. Conflict of Interest and Certification Do you have a Familial or Financial Relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Do you have any financial relationships with the County such as grants, contracts, or other economic relations? Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Kwame_Reed_Resume_2020a.pdf Kwame P Reed Page 3 of 4 Please Agree with the Following Statement I certify that the statements made by me in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. I acknowledge and undersand that all information in this application is publicly accessible. I understand that misstatements and/or omissions of material fact may cause forfeiture of my rights to serve on a board, committee, or commission in Contra Costa County. I Agree Kwame P Reed Page 4 of 4 RECOMMENDATION(S): RE-APPOINT Richard Johnson and Stacey Marshall to the Workforce Development Board for terms beginning July 1, 2020 and expiring June 30, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: NA BACKGROUND: Compared to predecessor legislation, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) substantially changes Local Board composition by reducing local workforce development board size while maintaining a business and industry majority and ensuring representation from labor and employment and training organizations. The recommended candidates for the re-appointment for the respective board seats are: • Governmental & Economic & Community Development Seat #2 - Richard Johnson – Approved on May 5, 2020 at the Full Board Meeting • Workforce Business Seat #7 - Stacey Marshall – Approved on May 5, 2020 at the Full Board Meeting **No other candidate competed for the Workforce Business Seat #7 and Governmental & Economic & Community Development Seat #2** APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Donna Van Wert; 925.671.4514 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 15 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointment to the Workforce Development Board BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) This item was considered by the Family and Human Services Committee on May 18, 2020. The Committee voted unanimously to approve the recommendations. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to fill the vacant seats on the WDB will reduce community input. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: NA ATTACHMENTS Current Roster as of May 2020 Johnson Application Marshall Application WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 4071 Port Chicago Highway • Suite 250 • Concord, CA 94520 Tel. (925) 671-4560 • Fax (925) 228-0238 Website: www.wdbcc.com MEMORANDUM DATE: May 5, 2020 TO: Board of Supervisors CC: Dennis Bozanich, CAO Sr. Deputy County Administrator FROM: Donna Van Wert, Executive Director SUBJECT: Appointment to Workforce Development Board This memorandum requests the Family and Human Services Committee recommend to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors the appointment of the following candidates to the new WIOA compliant Workforce Development Board of Contra Costa County. Background: Local board structure and size: Compared to predecessor legislation, the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) substantially changes Local Board composition by reducing local workforce development board size while maintaining a business and industry majority and ensuring representation from labor and employment and training organizations. The Executive Committee of the local WIOA board met January 21, 2016 and approved a recommended WIOA Board configuration, subsequently approved by the Board of Supervisors on March 29, 2016. To meet the categorical membership percentages, the WDB recommended a board of twenty-five (25) members. This option represents the minimum required local board size under WIOA plus an additional six (6) optional representatives in the following enumerated categories: 1) business; 2) workforce; 3) education and training. Category – Representatives of Business (WIOA Section 107(b)(2)(A)) • Thirteen (13) representatives (52%) Category – Representatives of Workforce (WIOA Section 107(b)(2)(A)) • Five (5) representatives (20%) Category – Representatives of Education and Training (WIOA Section 107(b)(2)(C)) • One (1) Adult Education/Literacy Representative (WIOA title II) • One (1) Higher Education Representative • One (1) Economic and Community Development Representative • One (1) Wagner Peyser Representative • One (1) Vocational Rehabilitation Representative Two (2) additional seats from the above categories, including constituencies referenced in Attachment III of Training Employment & Guidance Letter (TEGL) 27-14. DONNA VAN WERT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Recommendation: a) Recommend approval of local board candidate for the re-appointment for the following board seats. (Attached application and board roster) • Governmental & Economic & Community Development Seat #2 • Richard Johnson – Approved on May 5, 2020 at the Full Board Meeting b) Recommend approval of local board candidate for the vacant board seat. (Attached application and board roster) • Workforce Business Seat #7 o Stacey Marshall – Approved on May 5, 2020 at the Full Board Meeting **No other candidate competed for the Workforce Business Seat # 7 and Governmental & Economic & Community Development Seat #2** RE-APPOINTMENT Seat Last Name First Name Address & District # Term Start Date Term of Expiration District (Resident) Governmental & Economic & Community Development Seat #2 Johnson Richard 4071 Port Chicago Highway, Suite 250 Concord District #4 7/1/2020 6/30/2024 District 4 NEW APPOINTMENT Seat Last Name First Name Address & District # Term Start Date Term of Expiration District (Resident) Workforce Business Seat # 7 Marshall Stacey 830 Loring Avenue, CrockettDistrict #5 7/1/2020 6/30/2024 District #1 Thank you DVW/rms attachment A1b A1c A1d 4/2/2020 BOARD MEMBERS PUBLIC ROSTER District # (Resident)Re-Apply District # (Employment)Committee Michael McGill (Pending F&HS Committee Approval)1 3/29/2016 District #2 6/30/2020 YES Chairperson/Engineer MMS Design Associates District #2 EXEC/YOUTH Joshua Aldrich 2 10/9/2018 District #3 6/30/2022 CEO Del Sol NRG. Inc.District #3 BED Yolanda Vega (Pending F&HS Committee Approval) 3 Distrtict #2 6/30/20XX YES Principal Peak Performance Corporate Training District #2 BED Terry Curley 4 10/9/2018 District #2 6/30/2022 Executive Vice President United Business Bank District #4 BED Bhupen B. Amin 5 3/29/2016 District #4 6/30/2020 NO Chief Operating Officer & Counsel Lotus Hotels & Investments District #4 EXEC Jose Carrascal 6 3/29/2016 District #3 6/30/2020 Unknown Production Leader The Dow Chemical Company District #5 EXEC/YOUTH Stacy Marshall (Pending Executive Committee Approval)7 6/30/20XX Ashley Georgian 8 3/29/2016 Plesanton, CA 6/30/2020 NO Director, Government Affairs John Muir Health District #4 EXEC/BED Robert Muller 9 3/12/2019 District #5 6/30/2023 Learning Manager PBF Energy District #5 YOUTH Robert Rivera 10 3/29/2016 District #4 6/30/2020 NO Vice President of Sales The Staffing Solutions District #5 BED Justin Steele 11 3/29/2016 Berkeley, CA 6/30/2020 NO Human Resources Manager Chevron Richmond Refinery District #1 EXEC/BED Romina Gonzalez 12 3/12/2019 District#4 6/30/2023 Publlic Relations Dolan's Lumber Doors & Windows District #4 N/A Vacant 13 6/30/2022 Re-Apply Thomas Hansen 1 10/17/2017 6/30/2021 Business Manager IBEW Local 302 District #5 N/A Joshua Anijar 2 12/10/2019 6/30/2023 Executive Director Centra Labor Council Contra Costa County District #5 EXEC Steve Older 3 3/29/2016 District #4 6/30/2020 Unknown Registered Apprentiship/Area Director Intl. Assoc. of Machinist & Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, District 190 District #5 BED Vacant 4 6/30/20XX Vacant 5 6/30/20XX Re-Apply G. Vittoria Abbate 1 10/17/2017 District #2 6/30/2021 Director, College & Career & Adult Education Mt. Diablo Unified School District District #4 YOUTH Vacant 2 6/30/2023 Re-Apply Kristin Connelly (Kwame Reed - Pending F&HS Approval)1 3/29/2016 District #2 6/30/2020 NO Economic & Community Dev./President & CEO East Bay Leadership Council District #4 BED Richard Johnson (Pending Executive Committee Approval)2 3/29/2016 District #4 6/30/2020 YES Employment Service/Employment Prog.Manager ll California Employment Development Department District #4 BED Carol Asch (Pending F&HS Committee Approval)3 3/29/2016 6/30/2020 YES Rehabilitation Act of 1973/District Administrator California Department of Rehabilitation District #4 YOUTH Re-Apply Vacant (by July 1, 2020)1 6/30/2020 John Montagh 2 6/6/2017 6/30/2021 Economic Development & Housing Manager City of Concord District # 4 BED BUSINESS COMMITTEE WORKFORCE & LABOR Exec EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE EDUCATION AND TRAINING BED BUSINESS ECONOMIC & DEV. GOVERNMENTAL AND ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Youth YOUTH COMMITTEE FLEX ADDITIONAL MEMBERS N/A NOT ASSIGNED PENDING APPROVAL/CONFIRMATION VACANT SEAT TERM END DATE COMMITTEE Exec EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE BED BUSINESS & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Youth YOUTH COMMITTEE Entity Name Seat #Appointment Date Term End Date Title Entity Name Seat #Appointment Date Term End Date Title Entity Name Seat #Appointment Date Term End Date Title Entity Name Seat #Appointment Date Term End Date Title EntityNameSeat #Appointment Date Term End Date Title A1b A1c RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the appointment of Evelyn Howard to Seat #5 of the Alcohol & Other Drugs Advisory Board for a term expiring June 30, 2020, and appoint for an additional term until June 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: NA BACKGROUND: On December 18th, 2019 the Alcohol and other Drugs Advisory Board (AODAB) accepted the resignation of Michael Collins who was the Chair and At-Large member SEAT 5 of the AODAB, Mr. Collins submitted his resignation via email and the term for this seat ends June 30, 2020. As a result, a seat for an At-Large position became available and to prevent quorum issues, the Board recommended that Madison Gunn be appointed. Unfortunately, since then, Madison Gunn has rescinded her application. On January 13, 2020, AODAB’s Executive Committee interviewed Evelyn Howard and unanimously voted for the appointment of the following candidate to fill the vacant At-Large Seat 5: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Fatima Matal Sol; 5-3307 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 16 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointment to the Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Committee BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) NOMINEE SEAT TERM EXPIRATION Evelyn Howard Member-At-Large 5 6/30/2020 St. Alphonsus Way Alamo, CA 94507 In order to fill the vacancies, the Alcohol and Other Drugs Administration staff conducted outreach through community events and social media. The department also partnered with the Addiction Studies program of Diablo Valley College (DVC), to recruit applicants to the AODAB. This item was considered by the Family and Human Services Committee on May 18, 2020. The Committee voted unanimously to approve the recommendations and additionally recommended that Ms. Howard's appointment be approved for the subsequent term which begins on July 1, 2020 and expires on June 30, 2023. The Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board provides input and recommendations to the Board of Supervisors and the Health Services Department concerning family and community needs regarding prevention and treatment of alcohol and drug related problems. The mission of the Contra Costa County Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board is to assess family and community needs regarding treatment and prevention of alcohol and drug abuse problems. The board reports their findings and recommendations to the Contra Costa Health Services Department, the Board of Supervisors and the communities they serve. The Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board works in collaboration with the Alcohol and Other Drugs Services of Contra Costa Health Services. The board provides input and recommendations as they pertain to alcohol and other drugs prevention, intervention, and treatment. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Vacancies on advisory bodies reduce community input. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: NA RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE Appropriation and Revenue Adjustment No. 005079 in the amount of $25,000 authorizing new revenue and expenditure adjustments for Service Connected Aid (3316) and Contracts (2310) in the Employment and Human Services Department, Workforce Development Board (WDB) Bureau. New revenue received from the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Underserved COVID-19 Impacted Individuals Grant. FISCAL IMPACT: This action will establish the revenue and expenditure budgets related to WIOA COVID-19 Grant in the amount of $25,000 funded with 100% Federal revenue (CFDA # 17.278) and zero Net County Cost. BACKGROUND: Workforce Development Board, part of the Employment and Human Services Department received $108,000 Underserved COVID-19 Impacted Individuals Grant as part of WIOA 25% Additional Assistance. Grant term is March 1, 2020 through September 30, 2020. Appropriation Adjustments reflect work that will be done in Fiscal Year 2019-2020. Upon FY 2020-21 budget adoption, the remaining $83,000 will be recognized and appropriated in the budget. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Work will not be conducted in FY 2019-20. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Alicja Hermanson 925-608-4835 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 17 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Workforce Development Board Appropriation Adjustments AGENDA ATTACHMENTS TC 24/27 5079 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Appropriation & Adjustment No. 5079 RECOMMENDATION(S): Acting as the governing body of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District), APPROVE Appropriation and Revenue Adjustment No.005078 and AUTHORIZE an increase in available fund balance in the amount of $750,000 from Drainage Area 55 (DA 55) Fund 257900 and appropriating it for DA 55 Rights of Way & Easements account (3540) to allow for the reversal of the general ledger deposit account entry. The $750,000 deposit was included in the settlement payment made to the defendant pursuant to the final stipulation in Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District v. Gary A. Eames, et al., Case No. C15-02052, as recommended by the Chief Engineer, Antioch area. FISCAL IMPACT: This action increases appropriations to account 3540 from fund balance in Drainage Area 55, fund 257900 (100% DA 55 Funds). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Michelle Cordis, (925) 313-2381 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: David Twa, CAO, Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Michelle Cordis, Flood Control, Beth Balita, Finance, Catherine Windham, Flood Control C. 18 To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Appropriation and Revenue Adjustment for Reversal of General Ledger Deposit Entry. Project No. 7579-6D8399 BACKGROUND: Background: On October 5, 2015, the Flood Control District provided $750,000 for the initial deposit to the State Treasurer for litigation titled Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation Distric tv. Gary A. Eames, et al., Case No C15-02052 (Eames Case) – a condemnation action to acquire property for the West Antioch Creek Channel Improvement project in Drainage Area 55. On June 11, 2019, judgement was entered in the Eames case at which time the Flood Control District paid up to $920,000 from the District fund 250500 and up to $480,000 from Drainage Area 55 funds to pay additional $1,100,000. The total settlement and litigation costs totaled $1,850,000, including the deposit. Monies in Fund No. 250500 are not restricted to a particular drainage area and can be used for any Flood Control District expenditures. The original deposit of $750,000 was paid from Drainage Area 55 fund 257900 and this action is to release the deposit. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Appropriation and Revenue Adjustment is not approved, the settlement has not been fulfilled and the Flood Control District will be exposed to additional liabilities. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS TC24/27_AP005078 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Appropriation & Adjustment No. 5078 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT a position of "Support" on AB 2959 (Calderon): Solid Waste: Byproducts from Processing of Food, a bill that reauthorizes local government entities to exercise authority with regard to the hauling of byproducts from the processing of food or beverages if those byproducts originate from a supermarket, grocer, restaurant, or other retail food establishment, as recommended by the Legislation Committee. The Legislation Committee (Chair Mitchoff, Vice Chair Burgis) considered AB 2959 at its June 8, 2020 meeting and voted unanimously to recommend to the Board of Supervisors a position of "Support." FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact to the County related to advocacy for the bill. BACKGROUND: AB 2959 (Calderon): Solid Waste: Byproducts from Processing of Food APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 19 To:Board of Supervisors From:LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:AB 2959 (Calderon): Solid Waste: Byproducts from Processing Food BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Author:Ian C. Calderon (D-057) Title:Solid Waste: Byproducts from Processing of Food Fiscal Committee:no Introduced:02/21/2020 Last Amend:05/05/2020 Disposition:Pending Location:SENATE Summary:Reauthorizes local governmental entities to exercise authority with regard to the hauling of byproducts from the processing of food or beverages if those byproducts originate from a supermarket, grocer, restaurant, or other retail food establishment. Status: 06/08/2020 In ASSEMBLY. Read third time. Passed ASSEMBLY. *****To SENATE. (47-16) Full Status 02/21/2020 INTRODUCED. 03/05/2020 To ASSEMBLY Committee on NATURAL RESOURCES. 05/05/2020 From ASSEMBLY Committee on NATURAL RESOURCES with author's amendments. 05/05/2020 In ASSEMBLY. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Committee on NATURAL RESOURCES. 05/13/2020 From ASSEMBLY Committee on NATURAL RESOURCES: Do pass. (7-2) 05/18/2020 In ASSEMBLY. Read second time. To third reading. 06/08/2020 In ASSEMBLY. Read third time. Passed ASSEMBLY. *****To SENATE. (47-16) The text of the bill is available at: http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB2959 The bill analysis from the Assembly Floor is as follows: 2019 CA A 2959: Bill Analysis - 05/22/2020 - Assembly Floor ASSEMBLY THIRD READING AB 2959 (Calderon) As Amended May 5, 2020 Majority vote SUMMARY: Clarifies the entities that are exempted from solid waste franchise agreements for the hauling of food byproducts. Major Provisions This bill specifies that an "industrial source" excludes supermarkets, grocers, restaurants, and other retail food establishments. COMMENTS: 1) Meeting the state's recycling goals. An estimated 35 million tons of waste are disposed of in California's landfills annually, of which 32% is compostable organic materials, 29% is construction and demolition debris, and 17% is paper. CalRecycle is tasked with diverting at least 75% of solid waste from landfills statewide by 2020. Local governments have been required to divert 50% of the waste generated within the jurisdiction from landfill disposal since 2000. AB 341 (Chesbro), Chapter 476, Statutes of 2011, requires commercial waste generators, including multi-family dwellings, to arrange for recycling services for the material they generate and requires local governments to implement commercial solid waste recycling programs designed to divert solid waste generated by businesses out of the landfill. A follow up bill, AB 1826 (Chesbro), Chapter 727, Statutes of 2014, requires generators of organic waste (i.e., food waste and yard waste) to arrange for recycling services for that material to keep the material out of the landfill. SB 1383 (Lara), Chapter 395, Statutes of 2016, required the California Air Resources Board to approve and implement the comprehensive short-lived climate pollutant strategy to achieve, from 2013 levels, a 40% reduction in methane, a 40% reduction in hydrofluorocarbon gases, and a 50% reduction in anthropogenic black carbon, by 2030. In order to accomplish these goals, the bill specified that the methane emission reduction goals include targets to reduce the landfill disposal of organic waste 50% by 2020 and 75% by 2025 from the 2014 level. The purpose of the state's organic recycling goals is to divert material that is going to landfill to better purposes. However, some actions taken by solid waste local enforcement agencies to comply with the state's organics recycling requirements have resulted in material from agricultural operations that have historically been recycled into animal feed, soil amendments, and mulch and have never gone to landfill being pulled into the traditional waste management system. These agricultural recycling systems have been taking place for decades and serve a number of beneficial purposes that are consistent with the US Environmental Protection Agency's food recovery hierarchy, which sets priorities for food waste management: a) source reduction; b) feed hungry people; c) feed animals; d) industrial uses (i.e., rendering, fuel conversion, anaerobic digestion, and composting); and, e) disposal. 2) Whose waste? The current definition of solid waste includes materials that never make it into the waste stream. Agricultural operations have historically managed their own waste materials in environmentally beneficial ways. For example, fruit and vegetable growers may send their waste materials to a rancher to be used as cattle feed. Wineries may operate their own on-site composting operations to manage trimmings and generate compost to improve the quality of their soil. These practices keep costs down and comply with the state's waste management goals by keeping the material out of landfills. Traditionally, these practices have operated outside of the solid waste management system. Most jurisdictions in the state operate with some form of "franchise," or contract, that limits solid waste hauling within the jurisdiction to one or more companies. Franchises are often, but not always, accompanied by a local ordinance. Exclusive franchises specify one hauler within a jurisdiction. Non-exclusive franchises allow for more than one hauler, but establish specific requirements for hauling within the jurisdiction. Franchises can apply to residential, commercial, or industrial solid waste hauling and any combination thereof. Not all communities in California have franchise agreements. In 1994, the California Supreme Court ruled that franchises do not prohibit individuals within the franchise area from selling recyclable materials, as those materials are not waste because they have value. Additionally, state law specifies that individuals have the right to donate or sell recyclable materials. Enforcement of franchises is determined at the local level and varies by jurisdiction. In most cases, franchise waste haulers pursue direct legal action against unauthorized haulers. 4) Clarifying the law. AB 3036 (Cooley), Chapter 832, Statutes of 2018, prohibits a local government's franchise agreement to manage solid waste from including the handling of byproducts from the processing of food or beverages, as specified. AB 3036 was focused on agricultural material that has traditionally been managed outside of the solid waste stream. According to the Assembly Floor analysis: This bill attempts to provide clarity how this agricultural material can be handled. Agricultural operations have historically managed their own waste materials in environmentally beneficial ways. For example, fruit and vegetable growers may send their waste materials to a rancher to be used as cattle feed. Wineries may operate their own on-site composting operations to manage trimmings and generate compost to improve the quality of their soil. These practices keep costs down and comply with the state's waste management goals by keeping the material out of landfills. Over the last two years, AB 3036 has been interpreted by some to mean that any facility that generates food waste is exempt from local solid waste franchise agreements. That was not the intent of the bill. This bill seeks to clarify the law to conform to the intent of AB 3036. This bill does not change how agricultural materials are managed, nor does it limit the use of agricultural materials used for animal feed. This bill removes supermarkets, grocers, restaurants, and other retail food establishments from the existing prohibition on the inclusion of "industrial sources" in local solid waste franchises, which would allow local jurisdictions to determine whether or not to include those facilities in their franchise agreements and whether or not to allow those materials to be used as animal feed. According to the Author: The basic purpose of this measure is to enable farm-to-farm transfers of agricultural byproducts from a grower to another farmer, for use as animal feed. Waste sectors agreed that this limited and narrow practice could occur outside of an exclusive solid waste handling franchise. The creation of PRC 40059.4 was not intended to apply to agricultural byproducts generated at a retail store or restaurant. Arguments in Support: Californians Against Waste states: AB 3036 [(Cooley), Chapter 832, Statutes of 2018] established conditions under which an industrial generator of food scraps may be able to send their food scraps to animal feed operations, even if animal feed and industrial food processing were not contemplated in the original solid waste franchise adopted by a local jurisdiction. This was intentionally a narrowly-crafted piece of legislation designed to ensure that businesses could maximize their organic waste recycling without running afoul of local ordinances. However, this legislation has been incorrectly, and disingenuously, misinterpreted by some to create a much broader exemption beyond that which was intended in the original bill. Solid waste franchises are one of the most important tools that local governments have to not only protect public health and safety, but also to achieve the ambitious recycling goals established by the legislature. These franchises are the backbone of California's entire curbside recycling system and will be an indispensable instrument for rolling out new composting programs around the state. Franchise agreements also serve to ensure worker protections, cleaner fleets, and less congested streets. While we strongly disagree with those who claim that AB 3036 eliminated these important protections, this bill provides further clarity to the original legislation. Arguments in Opposition: A coalition of opponents, including the California Farm Bureau, state: AB 3036 (Cooley), Chapter 832, Statutes of 2018, addressed the challenge of defining byproducts that are allowable to be diverted to animal feed. As the sponsors and supporters of AB 3036 (Cooley), AB 2959 (Calderon) would undue much of the clarity the original bill sought to provide and would remove the ability to divert such byproducts... California is the largest agricultural state in the nation, producing more than $50 billion in value from the production of over 400 different commodities. Many of these commodities are packed, processed, or combined into a wide variety of food and beverage products that produce byproducts that serve as valuable nutrition for animal feed. These byproducts include but are not limited to fruit and vegetable peelings, tomato and grape pomace, citrus pulp, nut hulls, spent grain and malt sprouts, milk byproduct, rice husks or hulls from milling, bakery waste, sunflower meal, etc. As a perspective of the scale of byproduct use, California's wine production produces approximately 400,000 tons of grape pomace annually of which 50-80% is fed to livestock. In 2018, California produced nearly 4.6 billion pounds of almond hulls, almost all of which went to feed. Feeding these byproducts to the State's livestock industry provides nutrient-dense feed which allows for healthy animals and maximizes production. Its availability also prevents farms and ranches from having to depend upon imported feed, thereby reducing potential environmental impacts. This traditional diversion paradigm also provides a market for this byproduct to be kept out of landfills, helping ensure nothing goes to waste. It is for these reasons, that the undersigned organizations supported AB 3036 (Cooley) which clarified that these byproducts going to animal feed are not defined as waste and therefore not subject to the conditions governing waste management. AB 3036 even went a step further by requiring the byproduct meet specific conditions. AB 2959, however, would restrict many of the types of facilities specified under AB 3036 that traditionally divert byproducts for animal feed. These types of facilities would include supermarkets, grocers, restaurants, and other retail food establishments. FISCAL COMMENTS: None VOTES: ASM NATURAL RESOURCES: 7-2-2 YES: Friedman, Chau, Cristina Garcia, Limon, McCarty, Muratsuchi, Mark Stone NO: Flora, Mathis ABS, ABST OR NV: Brough, Eggman UPDATED: VERSION: May 5, 2020 CONSULTANT: Elizabeth MacMillan / NAT. RES. / (916) 319-2092 FN: 0002752 The Board of Supervisors' Legislation Committee considered this bill at its June 8, 2020 meeting and recommends to the Board a position of "Support." RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution #25614 to ESTABLISH the classifications of Chief of Administrative Services-Project (APD3) at salary plan and grade level B85-1003 ($9,042 - $10,991) and add one position, and Volunteer Program Coordinator-Project (X4H1) at salary plan and grade level ZB5-1582 ($6,117 - $7,435) and add one position; and ADD one (1) Health Services Planner/Evaluator Level A-Project (VAS2) at salary plan and grade level ZB2-1099 ($3,906 - $5,657); one (1) Departmental Personnel Officer-Exempt (APG1) at salary plan and grade level B85-1876 ($8,588 - $10,438); one (1) Assistant Director of Health Services-Exempt (VCB1) at salary plan and grade level B82-1991 ($9,452 - $15,110) positions in the Health Services Department. FISCAL IMPACT: This action has an annual increased cost of approximately $867,963 with pension costs of $200,830 already included. The cost is reimbursed with federal funding. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting to establish two (2) project classifications and add five (5) positions in order to meet Contra Costa County's obligation to the COVID19 health emergency, and to continue to run the countywide response across multiple departments. In recognition that the County's response to the COVID-19 pandemic will be over a sustained period of time these positions will be allocated to the HSD Department Operations Center as part of a planned reduction in the in the response to the pandemic by the County Emergency Operations APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jo-Anne Linares, (925) 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 20 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Establish two (2) project classifications and add five (5) positions in the Health Services Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Center. The County EOC will be preparing for potential wildfire and Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) events over the Summer months. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, the County will not have sufficient staff to manage the Emergency Operations Center which impacts the County's obligation and response to the COVID19 health emergency. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 25614 P300 No. 25614 - Attachment 1 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 25614 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 25614 DATE 6/17/2020 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No.0450 Org No.5752 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Establish two project classifications and add five (5) positions in varied classifications in the Health Services Department – SEE ATTACHMENT 1. Proposed Effective Date: Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $867,962.00 Net County Cost 0 Total this FY $867,962.00 N.C.C. this FY $0 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT: FEMA reimbursement funds Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Jo-Anne Linares ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Sarah Kennard for 6/17/2020 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 5/7/2020 Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt s alary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Dat e) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 6/17/2020 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: Yes 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) In response to COVID-19 health emergency 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) CDPH COVID-19 and FEMA funds 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date 07/2020 End Date 07/2021or longer Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. Year to year 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications Other - Health and safety of Contra Costa residents 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. None 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your c ost / benefit analysis will be submitted Na 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY ATTACHMENT 1 – HEALTH SERVICES DEPARTMENT P300 ADD the following positions in the Health Services Department: o ONE (1) Health Services Planner and Evaluator, Level A - Project (VAS2) o ONE (1) Chief of Administrative Services - P roject (APD 3) o ONE (1) Departmental Personnel Officer- Exempt (APG1) o ONE (1) Volunteer Program Coordinator - Project (X4H1) o ONE (1) Assistant Director of Health Services - Exempt (VCB1) RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25613 to add two (2) Assistant Public Defender-Exempt (25D2) (unrepresented) positions at Salary Plan and Grade B8E 2377 ($ 14,174 - $17,228), and appoint two (2) employees (68743 and 54780) to the Assistant Public Defender-Exempt (25D2) (unrepresented) positions; delete two (2) Deputy Public Defender IV (25TA) (represented) position numbers 3860 and 3885 in the Public Defender's Office with an effective date of July 1, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This action will result in a cost to the Department of approximately $46,298 annually. BACKGROUND: The Public Defenders Office is requesting to add and cancel positions to improve the supervisor-to-attorney ratio and increase the racial diversity of our management team. The incumbents have taken on supervisory and oversight duties that are commensurate with the responsibilities. The ongoing representation of indigent persons accused of crimes is a mandatory function. The Public Defenders Office is currently operating at capacity with all attorneys handling a full APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Joanne Sanchez, (925) 335-8065 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Joanne Sanchez-Rosa C. 21 To:Board of Supervisors From:Robin Lipetzky, Public Defender Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Add two (2) Assistant Public Defender-Exempt positions and cancel (2) Deputy Public Defender IV positions BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) caseload. New cases have continued to be filed, despite the inability of the courts to move cases through the court process. Now, as the court gears up to reopen for all purposes, it is anticipated there will be significant increase in felony and misdemeanor criminal filings. This increase in filings, in conjunction with the need to proceed with a number of trials that have been building up in the pipeline during the court closure, will place an additional strain on attorney workloads. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Department will have significant difficulties managing the attorney staff at this critical time. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 25613 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed P300 25613 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 25613 DATE 6/12/20 Department No./ Department RPublic Defender Budget Unit No. 0243 Org No. 2909 Agency No. 43 Action Requested: ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 25613 to add two (2) Assistant Public Defender (25D2), appoint two (2) employees (68743 and 54780) to the positions, and delete two (2) Deputy Public Defender IV (25TA) positions (3860 and 3885). Proposed Effective Date: 7/1/2020 Classification Quest ionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $46,298.00 Net County Cost $46,298.00 Total this FY $0.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTME NT 100% General Fund Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Joanne Sanchez ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Ramsey AlQaisi (for P. Reyes) 6/12/2020 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDA TIONS DATE 6/15/2020 Add two (2) Assistant Public Defender-Exempt (25D2) (unrepresented) positions at Salary Plan and Grade B8E 2 377 ($ 14,174 - $17,228), and appoint two (2) employees (68743 and 54780) to the Assistant Public Defender-Exempt (25D2) (unrepresented) positions; delete two (2) Deputy Public Defender IV (25TA) (represented) position numbers 3860 and 3885 in the Public Defenders Office with an effect ive date of July 1, 2020 Am end Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. 7/1/2020(Date) Gladys Scott Reid 6/15/2020 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 6/17/2020 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Res ources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Paul Reyes Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD AC TION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 6/17/2020 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approach es to delivering the services which you have cons idered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current j ob 2. Non-County employ ee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): RATIFY the County Administrator's direction to the Human Resources Department to temporarily expand the Tactical Employment Team Program (TETP) to include support of individuals released due to budget reductions during their probationary period. FISCAL IMPACT: None. This is an administrative action. BACKGROUND: The Human Resources Department is authorized to implement the Tactical Employment Team Program (Resolution No. 2008/299 attached). The objective of this program is to mitigate the negative impact that anticipated layoffs will have on the County’s workforce. The main components of the program are to find alternate placements within the County, facilitate outplacement, and provide personal support. The County's Personnel Management Resolution (Section 613 - Eligibility for Reemployment List) provides eligibility for reemployment for a person who has had permanent status which included satisfactory completion of probation. Employees who are separated due to budget reductions during their probation are considered releases rather than layoffs. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Ann Elliott, Acting Director of Human Resources C. 22 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Temporary Modification of Tactical Employment Team Program BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > Due to the unique situation and timing of COVID-19, individuals were not able to make decisions regarding employment with Contra Costa with timely data regarding funding of the positions for which they accepted employment. Therefore, the County Administrator has directed the Human Resources Department to include employees released due to budget reductions during their probationary period in the TETP. These employees and laid-off employees will be provided with preference when filling vacant, project, temporary, and contract positions; outplacement career counseling, workshops on resume preparation and interview tips, job search resources and tools, retraining opportunities, and registration with temporary employment agencies; and in cooperation with the Employee Assistance Program and other professional organizations, personal support services shall be made available to laid off employees, including financial planning, crisis intervention counseling, stress management, and retirement planning. Contra Costa County serves a large, diverse population which is reflected in the diversity of the County’s workforce and that of its dependent districts. It is the policy of Contra Costa County to comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws governing equal employment. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Employees who are released during their probationary period will not receive the full services which would otherwise be available to them through the TETP. ATTACHMENTS TETP - Resolution 2008-299 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept one-time supplemental CARES funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (ACF) in an amount not to exceed $1,690,825 for supplemental program services related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) during the term January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: One-time supplemental CARES Federal funding in the amount of $1,690,825 from the ACF to administer various activities to operate the Head Start, Early Head Start and Early Head Start Childcare programs in response to COVID-19. The breakdown of the $1,690,825 is as follows: Head Start Program - $1,187,269 Early Head Start Program - $273,309 Early Head Start Childcare Program - $230,247 Total - $1,690,825 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 23 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:CARES Funding for Head Start, Early Head Start and Early Head Start Childcare Programs FISCAL IMPACT: (CONT'D) The CARES Act funding will be awarded in one amount and is based on total funded enrollment of the grantee determined by ACF. On 04/03/2020, the Office of Head Start (OHS) announced that grantees can request a waiver of non-federal share as a result of Coronavirus (COVID-19) and therefore the grantee has requested the waiver for this supplemental funding. (CFDA #93.600) (100% Federal). BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County submits an application annually to the U.S. Health and Human Services Department, ACF, as the Head Start grantee. The Board of Supervisors approved the 2020 grantee application on September 10, 2019 (c.75). Through the recently approved CARES Act allotting funds to Head Start Programs, ACF has developed a funding opportunity for one-time supplemental funding to help grantees support COVID-19 initiatives. The coronavirus outbreak, a national emergency, is seriously affecting communities throughout the nation. The Head Start Act recognizes that lack of resources in a community adversely impacted by a major disaster may prevent Head Start grantees from providing all or a portion of their required non-federal contribution. The Office of Head Start (OHS) has determined that the widespread impact of the coronavirus outbreak adversely impacts all Head Start grantees. Consequently, OHS will approve all requests for waiver of non-federal match associated with the following funds for the 2020 fiscal year: Cost of Living Adjustment, Quality Improvement and funding associated with coronavirus. The Policy Council reviewed and approved the original supplemental grant application on May 20, 2020, however as noted above, ACF subsequently changed the one-time supplemental CARES funding to be based on total funded enrollment per grantee. The ACF confirmed the term for this funding should begin January 1, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: County would forego funding to administer services related to COVID-19 for the Head Start, Early Head Start, and Early Head Start Childcare Programs. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Community Services Bureau of the EHSD's Head Start program supports three (3) of Contra Costa County's community outcomes - Outcome 1: Children Ready for and Succeeding in School, Outcome 3: Families that are Economically Self-sufficient, and Outcome 4: Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing. These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to apply for and accept Program Improvement funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Office of Head Start, in an amount not to exceed $995,000 for a supplemental, one-time grant to provide facility renovation and construction at the central kitchen facility for the Head Start program for the period January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: The County will receive a one-time federal Program Improvement grant in an amount not to exceed $995,000. As Grantee, the County is required to generate a 20% non-federal match ($248,750) which will come from the use of County-owned Head Start facilities. There is no community or parent involvement in this project, so there are no volunteer hours that will be sourced from the community. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County submits an application annually to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 24 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Head Start Program Improvement Funding Grant BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) for Children and Families, Office of Head Start (OHS), as the Head Start grantee. This board order presents an opportunity for the County to apply for a supplemental, one-time Program Improvement grant for facility renovation. The grant was approved by the Head Start Policy Council on April 15, 2020. The Central Kitchen currently located at the Brookside Center is in urgent need of relocation due to the aging facilities and potential safety concerns. CSB's childcare portion of this facility was closed in June of 2018 and the children and staff were relocated elsewhere. This action would allow the Kitchen to also be relocated by renovating an alternate location in an existing County building nearby: 303 41st Street, Richmond. An application was previously submitted for renovation of the Richmond Veterans Memorial Hall and approved by the Board of Supervisors on March 12, 2019. Following approval and prior to project commencement, it was determined that this location was no longer available for relocation of the central kitchen. This funding opportunity is awarded based on availability of funds from the OHS for purposes of program improvement. Due to the prioritization of ACF funding in 2019, the department was not awarded program improvement funding. Construction and renovation of the Head Start Central Kitchen will not be entirely executed by December 31, 2020. Project completion is projected for early 2021. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County will be unable to cover construction/renovation costs of a central kitchen for the Head Start Program. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This funding will support three of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes - Outcome 1: Children Ready for and Succeeding in School, Outcome 3: Families that are Economically Self-sufficient, and Outcome 4: Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing. These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. ATTACHMENTS 39-945 HS Central Kitchen Renovation Grant RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Novation Contract #29-285-37 containing mutual indemnification with the City of San Pablo, a government agency, to provide congregate meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program, for the period from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021, which includes a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: City of San Pablo (Agency) will pay County the voluntary contributions it receives from participating seniors, after it has paid its authorized expenses. No County funds are required. BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing an average of 75 congregate meals per day, five days per week for senior citizens at the San Pablo Senior Center. While the County provides the meals to be distributed, food service equipment and supplies, nutrition education, food service monitoring, and overall program administration, the Agency will operate/manage the Congregate Senior Nutrition Café at the San Pablo Senior Center. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: F Carroll, M Wilhelm C. 25 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #29-285-37 with the City of San Pablo BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On July 23, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #29-285-36 with the City of San Pablo to provide congregate meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, which included a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2020. Approval of Novation Contract #29-285-37 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows the Agency to continue providing services through June 30, 2021. This Contract includes mutual indemnification. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County’s senior citizens who depend on County’s Senior Nutrition Program will not receive meals at Contractor’s facility. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Grant Award Extension #28-378-2 (Kaiser Grant #8527) with Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, to amend Grant Award Agreement #28-378-1, to extend the termination date from June 30, 2020 to December 31, 2020 with no change in the amount payable to the County of $30,000 for the East County Moves Program. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this Grant Agreement will result in an amount not to exceed $30,000 in funding from Kaiser Foundation Hospitals. ($9,193 County match required) BACKGROUND: The goal of the East County Moves Program is to increase the knowledge of, access to, and occurrence of healthy food sources and outdoor sites for physical activity among low-income residents in Pittsburg and Bay Point; and increase capacity of Healthy & Livable Pittsburg agencies to evaluate health programming and seek funding to increase further offerings. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 26 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Award Extension #28-378-2 from Kaiser Foundation Hospitals BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > On August 6, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Grant Award #28-378-1 with Kaiser Foundation Hospitals to receive funds for the East County Moves Program, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. Approval of Grant Award Extension #28-378-2 will allow the County to continue to receive funds for the East County Moves Program through December 31, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Grant Award Extension is not approved, the County will not be able to utilize funding received from Kaiser Foundation Hospitals to support the East County Moves Program. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract to accept funding from the California Department of Education in an amount not to exceed $27,500 to fund pre-kindergarten and family literacy program support services for the term July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement is funded 100% by State California Department of Education funding and there is no County match required. The State contract number is CPKS 0007; the County contract number is 39-896-13. BACKGROUND: The California Department of Education notified the Department on June 2, 2020 of the 2020-21 funding allocation. This revenue contract will provide support funds for pre-kindergarten and family literacy services to program eligible children and families. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County will not receive funding to operate this early childhood education program. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6334 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Nasim Eghlima, Nelly Ige, Teresita Foster C. 27 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:2020-21 California Department of Education Prekindergarten and Family Literacy Support Contract CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment and Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau, supports three of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 3) "Families that are Economically Self-sufficient"; and, 4) "Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing" by offering comprehensive services, including high quality childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT Resolution No. 2020/169 to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract to accept funding in an amount not to exceed $5,177,289 from the California Department of Aging for Older Americans Act Title III and Title VII services for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: County to receive an amount not to exceed $5,177,289 from the California Department of Aging, Older American Act funding. Funding is 79.5% Federal and 20.5% State, with a required county match of $201,652. BACKGROUND: The Employment and Human Services Department, Area Agency on Aging provides services to low income older County residents as defined by Title III and Title V of the Older American Act. Services include, but are not limited to supportive services, ombudsman services, congregate meal sites, nutrition services, home delivered meals, disease prevention, family caregiver services and elder abuse prevention services. Fiscal year 2019-20 funding was approved by the Board June 18, 2019 for $4,746,809. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without funding, Older American Act services could not be provided to Contra costa County residents. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres 607-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 28 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:California Department of Aging Older American Act Funding AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2020/169 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2020/169 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/23/2020 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2020/169 In The Matter Of: California Department of Aging Older American Act Funding. WHEREAS, the Employment and Human Services Department contracts with and receives funding from California Department of Aging to provide services under the Older American Act Title III and Title VII, and WHEREAS, the Employment and Human Services Department, Area Agency on Aging, provides Title III and Title VII services including, but not limited to supportive services, ombudsman services, disease prevention and health promotion, nutrition counseling, risk screening, congregate meal sites, home delivered meals, family caregiver services, and elder abuse prevention services to low-income older residents of the County. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved: the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, execute a contract with California Department of Aging to accept Older American Act funding in an amount not to exceed $5,177,269 (Agreement No. AP-2021-07) for Title III and Title VII services for the period July 1, 2020 through June 3, 2021. Contact: Elaine Burres 607-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a revenue agreement in the amount of $3,665,811 from the California Department of Education for alternative payment childcare programs operated by the County, with the term July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement is funded by the California Department of Education and no County match is required. The State funding number is CAPP 0010; the County number is 29-212-37. This contract is 58% ($2,125,714) funded by Federal dollars passed through the State Department of Education [CFDA #93.596 and #93.575], and 42% ($1,540,097) funded by the State. BACKGROUND: The Department was notified by the California Department of Education on June 2, 2020 of the County's 2020-21 allocation for the Alternative Payment childcare services program. The Alternative Payment childcare services APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6334 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Nasim Eghlima, Angela Winn, Nelly Ige C. 29 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:2020-21 CA Department of Education Alternative Payment Childcare Services Revenue Contract BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) program provides funding for program eligible families to receive services. Priority is given to families who interface with Child Protective Services, families with children at-risk of abuse and neglect, low-income families, and families with children who have special needs. Approval of this board order will allow the continued provision of these childcare services. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County will not receive additional funding to operate this childcare program. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment and Human Services Department Community Services Bureau supports three of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes - Outcome 1: “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School,” Outcome 3: “Families that are Economically Self-sufficient,” and, Outcome 4: “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing.” These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Education in an amount not to exceed $6,098,858 to provide childcare and development programs (California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids [CalWORKS] Stage 2) for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement is 83% State and 17% Federal funding passed-through the California Department of Education. This funding does not require a County match. State number is C2AP 0008; County number is 29-213-36. BACKGROUND: The Department received notification on June 2, 2020 from California Department of Education for the 2020-21 funding allocation for alternative payment / CalWORKS Stage 2 childcare services. This State program provides funding to reimburse a portion of the childcare costs incurred by CalWORKS Stage 2 participants through their participation in the CalWORKS program. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6334 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Nasim Eghlima, Angela Winn, Nelly Ige C. 30 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:2020-21 California Department of Education CalWORKS Stage 2 Childcare Revenue Contract CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County will not have funds to operate CalWORKS Stage 2 childcare program. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment and Human Services Department's Community Services Bureau supports three of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes - Outcome 1: “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School,” Outcome 3: “Families that are Economically Self-sufficient,” and, Outcome 4: “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing.” These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Education in an amount not to exceed $11,118,905, to provide State Preschool services, for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue agreement is from the California Department of Education, with 100% coming from the State. No County match is required. The State agreement number is CSPP 0052. The County agreement number is 39-908-29. BACKGROUND: The California Department of Education notified the Department on June 2, 2020 of the 2020-21 funding allocation of the California State Preschool program services. The County receives funds from the California Department of Education to provide state preschool services to program eligible County residents. The program is operated by the Employment and Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau. Approval of this board order will allow the continued provision of these childcare services. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County will not receive funding to operate these childcare programs. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6334 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Nasim Eghlima, Teresita Foster, Nelly Ige C. 31 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:2020-21 California Department of Education Preschool Program Revenue Contract CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment and Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau supports three of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 3) "Families that are Economically Self-sufficient"; and, 4) "Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing" by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to accept Grant Award #28-921 with the State of California Health and Human Services, Department of Social Services (CDSS) to pay the County an amount not to exceed $1,700,000, to provide emergency housing for immediate protection to prevent the spread of COVID-19 for Project Roomkey, for the period from March 18, 2020 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the Grant Award will result in payment to the County up to $1,700,000 in funding from the State of California Health and Human Services. No County match required. BACKGROUND: The goal of Project Roomkey is to provide non-congregate shelter options for people experiencing homelessness, to protect human life, and minimize strain on health care system capacity. California has demonstrated the need for hotel and motel rooms around the State to immediately provide non-congregate shelter options for the sick and medically vulnerable. Individuals lacking stable housing are more likely to use hospital emergency rooms. In some places, individuals experiencing homelessness made up 20% APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lavonna Martin, 925-608-6700 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 32 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Award #28-921 with the State of California Health and Human Services BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) to 30% of all adult hospital emergency room visits. Patients experiencing homelessness are admitted to inpatient units 5 times more often, and have average lengths of stay that are longer than people who have stable housing. Protecting individuals experiencing homelessness will relieve pressure on the hospital system by separating high-risk individuals who are homeless from COVID-19 positive or persons under investigation, in order to protect public health and safety for the duration of this Public Health Emergency. Approval of Grant Award #28-921 will allow the County to provide emergency homelessness funds to expand immediate shelter and isolation capacity and provide COVID-19 prevention to the homeless population, through June 30, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this grant is not approved, Contra Costa County will not be able to provide non-congregate shelter for the homeless population causing an increase in deaths due to COVID-19. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an agreement with the California Department of Education, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $3,855,946 for general childcare and development program services for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: County is to receive up to $3,855,946, with 34.7% ($1,336,723) coming from Federal funding and 65.3% ($2,519,223) from State funding. No County match is required. The State contract number is CCTR 0025; County contract number is 39-801-48. (CFDA Nos. 93.596, 93.575). BACKGROUND: The County receives funds from the California Department of Education to provide general childcare services to program eligible County residents. The program is operated by the Employment and Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau. Approval of this board order will allow the continued provision of these childcare services. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County will not receive funding to operate the Childcare and Development Program. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6334 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Nasim Eghlima, Teresita Foster, Nelly Ige C. 33 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:2020-21 California Department of Education General Childcare & Development Revenue Contract CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Department of Education General Childcare & Development funding supports three of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 3) "Families that are Economically Self-sufficient"; and, 4) "Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing" by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #28-530-27 with the City of San Ramon, a government agency, in an amount not to exceed $25,000, to provide home-delivered and congregate meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program, for the period from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: Agency will pay County the voluntary contributions it receives from participating seniors, after it has paid its authorized expenses. No County funds required. BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing an average of 35 congregate meals per day, five days per week for senior citizens at the San Ramon Senior Center, and home delivered meals to senior citizens in the San Ramon area. On July 23, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #28-530-26 with the City of San Ramon to provide home-delivered and congregate meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 34 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #28-530-27 with the City of San Ramon BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Program for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, which included a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2020. This contract includes mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this Contract. Approval of Contract #28-530-27 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows the Agency to continue providing services through June 30, 2021. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County’s senior citizens who depend on County’s Senior Nutrition Program will not receive meals at Contractor’s facility. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Novation Contract #28-381-2, including mutual indemnification, with the Town of Danville, a government agency, to provide congregate meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program, for the period from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: Agency will pay County the voluntary contributions it receives from participating seniors, after it has paid its authorized expenses. No County funds are required. BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing an average of 35 congregate meals one day per week for senior citizens at the Town of Danville Senior Center. On July 9, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #28-381-1 with the Town of Danville to provide congregate meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, which included a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 35 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #28-381-2 with the Town of Danville BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract #28-381-2 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows the Agency to continue providing services through June 30, 2021. This contract includes mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this Contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, senior citizens who depend on County’s Senior Nutrition Program will not receive meals at Contractor’s facility. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #29-335-33 with the City of El Cerrito, a government agency, including mutual indemnification, to provide congregate meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program for the period from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: Agency will pay County the voluntary contributions it receives from participating seniors, after it has paid its authorized expenses. No County match required BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing an average of 40 meals per day, five days per week, for senior citizens in El Cerrito. On July 9, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #29-335-32 with the City of El Cerrito to provide congregate meal services for the County’s Senior Nutrition Program for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, which included a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 36 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #29-335-33 with the City of El Cerrito BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract #29-335-33 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows Agency to continue providing services through June 30, 2021. This Contract includes mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this Contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, senior citizens who depend on County’s Senior Nutrition Program will not receive meals at Contractor’s facility. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the District Attorney, or designee, to submit an application and execute a grant award agreement, and any extensions or amendments thereof pursuant to State guidelines, with the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), Victim Services & Public Safety Branch, for funding of the Victim/Witness Assistance Program in the amount of $1,439,926 for the period October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: The District Attorney will receive $1,439,926 of revenues that have been budgeted. This grant requires a match of $325,646. The Department anticipates approval of a match waiver for the required match in its entirety. It would otherwise be met either in-kind or cash match. BACKGROUND: On June 22, 2004, the District Attorney was designated by the Board of Supervisors as the provider of comprehensive victim and witness services for the County, effective July 1, 2004. Fiscal year 2020-2021 is the seventeenth year that the District Attorney is applying for funds available to support the costs of Contra Costa County's Victim/Witness Assistance Program. The grant application will continue to fund staff salaries and benefits to provide services to victims and witnesses of crimes. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jason Chan, (925) 957-2234 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 37 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diana Becton, District Attorney Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Victim/Witness Grant Award for October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The District Attorney will be unable to apply for the grant. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2020/171 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2020/171 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/23/2020 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2020/171 In The Matter Of: Victim/Witness Assistance (VW) Program Grant Award for October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021. WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County, desires to undertake a certain project designated as the Victim/Witness Assistance (VW) Program to be funded in part from funds made available under the authority of the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), Victim Services & Public Safety Branch. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the District Attorney of the County of Contra Costa is authorized to execute, on behalf of the Board of Supervisors, the Grant Award Agreement, including any extensions or amendments thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant expenditures previously authorized or controlled by this body. Contact: Jason Chan, (925) 957-2234 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to accept funding in an amount not to exceed $5,000 from California Health Care Advocates to provide volunteer liaison support for the Senior Medicare Patrol-Medicare Fraud program for the period June 1, 2020 through May 31, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: County to receive $5,000 from California Health Care Advocates for Medicare Patrol/Medicare Fraud, which is 100% Federal. BACKGROUND: California Health Care Advocates will provide funding to Employment and Human Services, Aging and Adult Services Bureau, Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program (HICAP) for the Senior Medicare Patrol (SMP) volunteer liaison who will focus on outreach and education regarding prevention and supporting Medicare Fraud Prevention. The funding will be used to support the SMP liaison activities which may include data collection, monitoring and reporting customer inquiries, volunteer recruitment, training and support, community education, and fraud prevention activities. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without funding, Medicare Fraud liaison activities would not be support through HICAP. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres, 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 38 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:California Health Care Advocates Funding CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Without funding, Medicare Fraud liaison activities would not be provided through HICAP. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Orantes, LLC dba Tiny Toes Preschool and Childcare Center, to increase the payment limit by $123,231 to a new payment limit of $220,343, effective October 1, 2019, and to add 14 State General Childcare and Development and 8 Head Start Childcare Partnership slots, for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is 54% funded by federal grant funds from the Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Head Start Program and 46% funded by state funds from the State of California Department of Education General Childcare and Development. There is no County match requirement. [CFDA 93.600] BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County receives funds from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (ACF) to provide Head Start and Early Head Start program services to program eligible County residents. The Employment and Human Services Department, in turn, contracts with a number of community-based APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6334 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Nasim Eghlima C. 39 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:2019-2020 Orantes, LLC Childcare Services Contract Amendment BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) organizations to provide a wider distribution of services. The original contract is to provide 8 Early Head Start program slots for children ages birth to 3 years of age. This amendment ensures Orantes, LLC dba Tiny Toes Preschool and Childcare has funding to fulfill the obligations for the contract term by adding 14 state slots and eight additional Head Start Childcare Partnership Program slots. As of June 18, 2020, this contract amendment has not yet been approved as to form by County Counsel or County Administrator's Office. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, the County will not be able to fund additional childcare slots and provide start up funds for it's community based agency partner, Orantes, LLC. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract supports three of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes - Outcome 1: Children Ready for and Succeeding in School, Outcome 3: Families that are Economically Self-sufficient, and Outcome 4: Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing. These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute a contract, including indemnification language changes, with Industrial Employers and Distributor's Association (IEDA) in an amount not to exceed $720,000 to provided labor negotiations and support services for the period of July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of the contract for the period of July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2023 will be $720,000, and will be funded initially by the General Fund and subsequently spread to other funds through the Cost Plan. BACKGROUND: Due to a long-standing contract with IEDA, the County Administrator's Office is requesting to continue contracting with IEDA for labor relations and negotiation services. IEDA has represented Contra Costa County in labor relations matters for about 40 years and augments the County’s Labor Relations staff. IEDA has long term, historical knowledge of the policies, practices and intricacies of the County and its operating departments and is instrumental in negotiations. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller, Dianne Dinsmore, Human Resources Director C. 40 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with IEDA for Labor Negotiations and Support Services CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the County's ability to negotiate with our recognized employee organizations will be significantly impaired. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, a Corporation of Delaware, in an amount not to exceed $9,450 to provide genetic parentage testing services for clients of the Children and Family Services Bureau for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract will increase the department budget expenditures by $9,450 to be funded by 30% County and 70% State 2011 Realignment funds. BACKGROUND: On June 20, 2019, the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) was notified that The California Department of Child Support Services (CDSS) has obtained a statewide Contract for Genetic Testing that goes into effect July 1, 2019. CDSS will no longer be able to facilitate payment for EHSD's Genetic Testing under the County's existing Department of Child APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: C. Youngblood, (925) 608-4964 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 41 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings for Genetic Parentage Testing Services for Clients BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Support Services contract with Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (known as LabCorp), which was immediately terminated on June 30, 2019. This required EHSD to take on these contracting responsibilities with LabCorp. The Contra Costa County DCSS contacted the CDSS Office to see if CDSS could keep the current account open until EHSD was able to get another County contract in place. CDSS advised that LabCorp would work with EHSD, so there would be no disruption in services. A contract was approved with this Contractor by the board on September 10, 2019 (c.81). The services provided under this Contract must meet certain conditions to meet the current needs of EHSD for Children and Family Services clients. This service is court ordered and requires an active provider to handle service delivery for clients. The contract contains modified indemnification and insurance, which were approved by Risk Management. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: County will not be able to comply with court-ordered genetic testing of CFS clients. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an inter-agency agreement amendment with San Ramon Valley Unified School District to increase payment limit by $7,689.60 to a new payment limit of $245,376, with no change to term July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement is 100% funded by state funding from the California Department of Education. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County receives funds from the California Department of Education to administer State Preschool services to program eligible children and families in Contra Costa County. The Employment and Human Services Department, in turn, contracts with a number of community-based organizations to provide a wider distribution of services. On July 23, 2019 (c.77), the Board approved the agreement with San Ramon Valley Unified School District, to fund 48 program slots for program eligible children who receive school district services. This amendment is to pass through the State daily reimbursement rate increase from $27.51 to $28.40. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB, (925) 681-6389 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Nasim Eghlima, Christina Reich, Teresita Foster C. 42 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:2019-20 San Ramon Valley Unified School District Childcare Services Agreement CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, the County will not be able to pass through daily rate increase to San Ramon Valley School Unified School District. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment and Human Services Department Community Services Bureau supports three of Contra Costa County’s five community outcomes - Outcome 1: Children Ready for and Succeeding in School, Outcome 3: Families that are Economically Self-sufficient, and Outcome 4: Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing. These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Ombudsman Services of Contra Costa, Inc., effective February 2, 2020, to increase the payment limit by $10,730 to a new payment limit of $502,187 to provide long-term care ombudsman services with no change to the existing term ending June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will increase budget expenditures by $10,730 to a new total expenditure of $502,187 to be funded 20% Federal revenues (Older Americans Act, Title III-B and Title VII-A revenue (CFDA# 93.044, 93.041), and 80% State revenues (Licensing and Certification Program funds, Citation Penalties Account funds, and Skilled Nursing Facility Quality and Accountability Act funds). There is no required county match. BACKGROUND: Ombudsman Services of Contra Costa, Inc. provides long-term care ombudsman services for adults including mediation and conciliation APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 8-4961 or 812-6795 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 43 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Amend Contract with Ombudsman Services of Contra Costa, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) services, creation of Family Councils for support of families of long-term care residents, document and report investigations of physical abuse of all dependent adult and elder residents of long-term care facilities, education and training on seniors' rights, benefits, and entitlements. This Amendment allocates a portion of the California Department on Aging’s annual redistribution of unused funds from all California counties in relation to long-term care ombudsman services. Funds will be used for needed program supplies and COVID-19 safety supplies for volunteers. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Contractor will be unable to purchase needed program supplies and COVID-19 safety supplies for the volunteers. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Richmond Elementary School, Inc. to increase the payment limit by $8,544 to a new payment limit of $272,640, for State Preschool services with no change to term July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: Entirely funded with State, California Department of Education funds. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County receives funds from California Department of Education to provide State Preschool services to program eligible County residents. In order to provide a wider distribution of services to County residents, the Department contracts with a number of community-based organizations. The State requires an indemnification clause with County subcontractors wherein the subcontractor holds harmless the State and its officers for any losses. The board approved the 2019-20 contract on September 10, 2019 (c.122) for the provision of childcare services for 48 children enrolled in Richmond College APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6333 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Nasim Eghlima, Teresita Foster C. 44 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:2019-20 Richmond Elementary School, Inc. State Preschool Childcare Services Contract Amendment BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Prep preschool programs. This board order is to approve a contract amendment to pass through the higher childcare daily reimbursement rate from the State to County childcare partners. The State routinely increases the daily reimbursement rate during the program year. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County will not be able to pass through the increased daily reimbursement rate to the Contractor. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment & Human Services Department Community Services Bureau supports three of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes - Outcome 1: “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School,” Outcome 3: “Families that are Economically Self-sufficient,” and, Outcome 4: “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing.” These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #72-148 containing mutual indemnification with Aunt Bertha, a Public Benefit Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $100,000, for a hosted software system and patient resource database including technical support and training services for the period from April 1, 2020 through March 31, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Whole Person Care funds. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County's population in that it provides a look-up database for patients who have identified needs. This contract allows access to community resources, with the ability for resources to be uploaded into Epic. Approval of Contract #72-148 allows the Contractor to provide services through March 31, 2021. This Contract includes mutual indemnification. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County residents will not receive the benefits afforded by the County having a subscription to the resource database. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D, 925-957-5169 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: F Carroll, M Wilhelm C. 45 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #72-148 with Aunt Bertha RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with FCS International, Inc. (dba FirstCarbon Solutions/Michael Brandman Associates), to increase the payment limit by $16,700 to a new payment limit of $370,686, with no change to the original term of October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2020, to complete the environmental study of the proposed 284-unit Del Hombre apartment complex in the Walnut Creek area. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact to the General Fund. The cost for preparing the EIR is paid by the project applicant. BACKGROUND: The Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) received an application from 3000 Del Hombre Holdings, LLC requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Minor Subdivision, and Development Plan for a proposed 284-unit apartment project in the Walnut Creek area to be known as the Del Hombre Apartments. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jennifer Cruz, (925) 674-7790 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 46 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment with FCS International Incorporated to Continue Work on the EIR for the Del Hombre Apartment Project in the Walnut Creek Area BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Based on the scope and scale of the project, the Department determined an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should be prepared in order to evaluate the potential environmental impacts of the project. The County awarded a contract to FCS (Contract #46393), who is currently in the process of preparing the document. Due to the number of comments received during the Draft EIR public comment period, additional work and additional funds will be required to complete the Final EIR. The increased expenditure limit of $16,700 is needed to complete the remaining tasks for the environmental review. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If unapproved, DCD will be unable to complete the environmental review for the pending land development application. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Fire Chief, or his designee, to execute a purchase contract with Halcore Group, Inc. (DBA American Emergency Vehicles) for the manufacture and sale of 20 ambulance vehicles in an amount not to exceed $3,200,000, including indemnity by the Fire District. 2. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Fire Chief, or his designee, to execute the sixth lease schedule to the Master Lease Agreement with PNC Equipment Finance, LLC in an amount not to exceed $3,200,000 including finance charges, with annual payments not to exceed $630,000 for a term from June 23, 2020 to June 23, 2025, for the lease-purchase of the ambulance vehicles. 3. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Fire Chief, or his designee, to execute an escrow agreement among PNC Equipment Finance, LLC, the Fire District, and U.S. Bank National Association. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Ambulance Transport Fund: Budgeted in FY 2020-21. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Aaron McAlister, Deputy Fire Chief (925) 941-3300 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 47 To:Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Board of Directors From:Lewis T. Broschard III, Chief, Contra Costa Fire Protection District Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Ambulance Purchase and Associated Lease-Purchase BACKGROUND: On December 9, 2014, the Board approved and authorized the Fire Chief to enter into a Master Lease Agreement with PNC Equipment Finance, LLC ("PNC"), and on December 23, 2014, the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District ("District") entered into the Master Lease Agreement (the "MLA") with PNC. The MLA was used in 2014, 2015, 2018 and 2019 to finance the purchase of engines and ladder trucks from Pierce Manufacturing. This MLA will now be utilized to purchase ambulance vehicles, resulting in a sixth lease schedule under the MLA with PNC. On May 12, 2020, the District Board of Directors authorized the Fire Chief to execute a contract extension to provide emergency ambulance service and an contract amendment and extension with American Medical Response as the subcontractor for the next five years. A component of this amendment is for the District to purchase the rolling stock for the next five-year term. This purchase fulfills this requirement of the amendment. This agreement provides for the purchase and delivery of 20 ambulances manufactured by AEV according to the Fire Districts specifications. Delivery will be staggered over of a period of time as they are completed at the factory. All units will be delivered no later than 120 days from the execution of the contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The District will not be able to acquire new ambulances. The District's contract with the County has requirements for maximum age and mileage. This purchase keeps the District in compliance with those requirements. RECOMMENDATION(S): AUTHORIZE the Clerk-Recorder or designee to execute an Agreement with the City of El Cerrito for documentary transfer tax collection services provided by the County to the City, effective July 1, 2020 until terminated. FISCAL IMPACT: The County will receive administrative costs associated with collecting documentary transfer tax for the City of El Cerrito. 100% General Fund. BACKGROUND: On December 4, 2018, the City of El Cerrito, a charter City, adopted Ordinance 2018-03 to increase its documentary transfer tax to $12.00 per $1,000 of value transferred. This tax rate is beyond the limit set by Revenue and Taxation Code 11911(b) for general law cities. The Code stipulates that if a City sets a tax not in accordance with Section 11911(b), then the County is not required to split with the City the County documentary transfer tax for transfers which occur within that City. Prior to December 4, 2018, the City of El Cerrito charged a documentary transfer tax in conformance with the Revenue and Taxation Code 11911(b) and the County split the $1.10 tax per $1,000 of value transferred APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Laura Wilson, 925-335-7921 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 48 To:Board of Supervisors From:Deborah R. Cooper, Clerk-Recorder Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Documentary Transfer Tax - City of El Cerrito BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) within the City ($.55 to the County and $.55 to the City). Because the City raised its tax to $12.00 per $1,000, the County may legally retain the entire $1.10 tax per $1,000 value. The City has requested that the County Recorder collect the City's documentary transfer tax, and the City and County have agreed that reasonable costs incurred by the County in collecting the City's tax shall be reimbursed to the County. The County Recorder's experience is that recording staff will expend considerable time and effort explaining the new tax to customers and collecting the tax. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: None. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Service Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #26-391-31 with Maxim Health Care Services, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 to provide temporary nursing staff services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: On July 23, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-391-30 with Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., to provide temporary nursing staffing services to provide patient care services at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers during peak loads, temporary absences, vacations or emergency situations for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. Approval of Contract #26-391-31 will allow the Contractor to provide temporary staff to provide patient care services at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers through June 30, 2021. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 49 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-391-31 with Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring services during peak loads, temporary absences, vacations or emergency situations will not have access to Contractor’s services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #26-473-28 with SHC Services, Inc. (dba Supplemental Health Care), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000 to provide temporary medical staffing services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC), Contra Costa Health Centers and County’s Detention Facilities for the period from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On March 26, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-473-27 with SHC Services, Inc. (dba Supplemental Health Care), to provide temporary nurses, medical assistants and other ancillary staffing services at CCRMC, Contra Costa Health Centers and County’s Detention Facilities, for the period from April 1, 2019, through June 30, 2020. Approval of Contract #26-473-28 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide temporary medical staff services to assist the Divisions during peak workloads, temporary absences and emergency situations, through June 30, 2021. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 50 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-473-28 with SHC Services, Inc. (dba Supplemental Health Care) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients at CCRMC, Contra Costa Health Centers and Detention Centers will not have access to Contractor’s services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Extension Agreement #74-597-2 with Mariposa McCall, M.D., an individual, to amend Contract #74-597 (as amended by Amendment Extension #74-597-1), to extend the termination date from June 30, 2020 to September 30, 2020 with no change in the payment limit of $338,912, for additional outpatient psychiatric care services. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Mental Health Realignment Funds. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On May 7, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-597 (as amended by Amendment Extension #74-597-1) with Mariposa McCall, M.D., to provide outpatient psychiatric care services including diagnosing, counseling, evaluation, and providing medical and therapeutic treatment to adults in Central County, for the period from May 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. Approval of Contract Extension Agreement #74-597-2 will allow the Contractor to provide additional outpatient psychiatric care services through September 30, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D., 925-957-5212 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker C. 51 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Extension Agreement #74-597-2 with Mariposa McCall, M.D. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, Contractor will not provide additional outpatient psychiatric care services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of County Contract #76-555-4 with Initha R. Elangovan, M.D., an individual, in an amount not to exceed $420,000, to provide pulmonology services for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Health Centers patients, for the period September 1, 2020 through August 31, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No Rate Increase) BACKGROUND: On September 10, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-555-3 with Initha R.Elangovan, M.D., to provide pulmonology services at CCRMC and Health Centers for the period September 1, 2019 through August 31, 2020. Approval of Contract #76-555-4 will allow Contractor to continue to provide pulmonology services at CCRMC and Health Centers through August 31, 2021. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring pulmonology services at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers will not have access to Contractor’s services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: A Floyd, M Wilhelm C. 52 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #76-555-4 with Initha R. Elangovan, M.D. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #24-794-7(20) with St. Helena Hospital (dba Adventist Health Vallejo), a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $75,000, to provide inpatient psychiatric hospital services for the period from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Mental Health Realignment Funds. (No Rate increase) BACKGROUND: Assembly Bill (AB) 757, (Chapter 633, Statutes of 1994), authorized the transfer of state funding for Fee-For-Service/Medi-Cal (FFS/MC) acute psychiatric inpatient hospital services from the Department of Health Services (DHCS) to the Department of Mental Health (DMH). On January 1, 1995, the DMH transferred these funds and the responsibility for authorization and funding of Medi-Cal acute psychiatric inpatient hospital services to counties that chose to participate in this program. On September 10, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #24–794–7(19), for the provision of inpatient psychiatric hospital services for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. Approval of Contract #24–794–7(20) will allow Contractor to provide inpatient psychiatric services through June 30, 2021. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, Ph.D., 925-957-5212 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: A Floyd, M Wilhelm C. 53 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #24-794-7(20) with St. Helena Hospital (dba Adventist Health Vallejo) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) This contract contains mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this Contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County’s mental health clients will not receive needed inpatient psychiatric services from Contractor’s facility. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with We Care Services for Children, to increase the payment limit by $7,689.60 to a new payment limit of $245,376 for State Preschool services with no change to the term July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: Increase of $7,689.60 in expenditures. 100% funded with State, California Department of Education funds. There is no County match. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County receives funds from California Department of Education to provide State Preschool services to program eligible County residents. The State requires an indemnification clause with County subcontractors wherein the subcontractor holds harmless the State and its officers for any losses. In order to provide a wider distribution of services to County residents, the Department contracts with a number of community-based organizations. The board approved the 2019-20 contract on September 10, 2019 (c.123) to fund State Preschool services to 48 program-eligible APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. Gonzales 608-4968 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Nasim Eghlima, Teresita Foster C. 54 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:2019-20 We Care Services for Children State Preschool Contract Amendment BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) children and families in the Central Contra Costa County area. This board order is to approve an amendment to this contract to pass through the higher childcare daily reimbursement rate from the State to the County's childcare partners. The state routinely increases the daily reimbursement rate during the program year. 2019-20 We Care Services for Children State Preschool contract amendment CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County will not be able to pass through the increased daily reimbursement rate. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract amendment supports three of Contra Costa County's community outcomes - Outcome 1: "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School," Outcome 3: "Families that are Economically Self-sufficient," and , Outcome 4: "Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing" by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an agreement with Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority, a public agency, in an amount not to exceed $2,471,293.06 to provide in-home caregiving services to IHSS recipients, for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This will increase department expenditures by $2,471,294 to be funded with 19% County, 29% State, and 52% Federal (CFDA#: 93.778) revenues. BACKGROUND: The County Board of Supervisors enacted Ordinance Number 98-14 March 1998 establishing the Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority (PA) as an independent public agency pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code section 12301.6. While the PA is an independent public agency providing service to the County, it also receives services from County departments. This dual relationship requires an agreement that establishes the respective obligations and responsibilities of the County and the PA. This board order will authorize the execution of the FY2020-2021 interagency agreement and will ensure the continuation of IHSS program services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. Gonzales 608-4968 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 55 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Contra Costa County In-Home Supportive Services Public Authority for In-Home Supportive Services CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: In-home caregiving services to County IHSS recipients provided through the Public Authority may not be delivered. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Child Abuse Prevention Council, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,358,693 to provide child abuse prevention services for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: The funds allocated for this contract are 70% State 2011 Realignment ($951,085) and 30% County General Fund ($407,608). BACKGROUND: Child Abuse Prevention Council will direct and coordinate ongoing activities aimed at mobilizing community resources and educating professionals and citizens to reduce the incidents of child abuse. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Valuable services to prevent child abuse will not be provided. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: C. Youngblood, (925) 608-4964 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 56 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Child Abuse Prevention Council CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract supports all of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: (1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; (2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; (3) "Families that are Economically Self Sufficient"; (4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and (5) "Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families," by providing services to prevent child abuse and thus maintain the family. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Amendment #22-219-64 with Elior, Inc. (dba Bateman Community Living, LLC), a corporation, to amend Novation Contract #22-219-63, effective May 1, 2020, to amend Novation Contract #22-219-63, to increase the payment limit by $525,000, from $3,171,323 to a new payment limit of $3,696,323, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, and to increase the automatic extension payment limit by $131,250 from $792,831 to a new payment limit of $924,081 through September 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is 100% federally funded, under Title III C-1 and Title III C-2 of the Federal Older Americans Act of 1965. No County funds are required. (Rate Increase) BACKGROUND: On June 11, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #22–219–63 with Elior, Inc. (dba Bateman Community Living, LLC), for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, which included a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2020, for the provision of meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program. Approval of Amendment #22-219-64 will allow the Contractor to provide additional meal services through June 30, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 57 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #22–219–64 with Elior, Inc. (dba Bateman Community Living, LLC) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the elderly, disabled, and AIDS/HIV diagnosed citizens of Contra Costa County participating in the Senior Nutrition Program may not receive the appropriate meals or nutrition. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute Contract #76-588-6 with Cross Country Staffing, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $2,700,000, to provide temporary medical staffing services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 18, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-588-3 (as amended by Amendment Agreements #76-588-4 and #76-588-5) with Cross Country Staffing, Inc., to provide temporary medical staffing services including licensed vocational nursing, Sexual Assault Vocational Nurse Examiner (SANE), clinical laboratory scientist, certified medical assistant and other ancillary classifications at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. Approval of Contract #76-588-6 will allow Contractor to provide temporary medical staffing services at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers through June 30, 2021. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 58 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #76-588-6 with Cross Country Staffing, Inc. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers will not have access to Contractor’s services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #26-306-32 with Per Diem Staffing Systems, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $800,000 to provide temporary respiratory therapists, nursing, and other medical classifications at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: On July 23, 2019 the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-306-31 with Per Diem Staffing Systems, Inc., to provide temporary respiratory therapists, nursing and other categories of medical services to cover employee sick leaves, vacations and workers compensation leaves, at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. Approval of Contract #26-306-32 will allow the Contractor to continue providing temporary respiratory, nursing, and other categories of medical services through June 30, 2021. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 59 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-306-32 with Per Diem Staffing Systems, Inc. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring respiratory therapists, nursing and additional medical personnel services at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers will not have access to Contractor’s services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #76-584-3 with All Health Services, Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000, to provide temporary medical staffing services at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC), Contra Costa Health Centers and Detention Facilities for the period from July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 18, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-584-2 with All Health Services, Corporation to provide temporary medical staffing services at CCRMC, Contra Costa Health Centers and Detention Facilities, for the period May 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. Approval of Contract #76-584-3 will allow Contractor to continue to provide temporary medical staffing services at CCRMC, Contra Costa Health Centers and Detention Facilities through June 30, 2021. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 60 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #76-584-3 with All Health Services, Corporation CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County will not have access to Contractor’s temporary medical staffing services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an interagency agreement with Chabot-Las Positas Community College District (CLPCCD), in an amount not to exceed $450,000 to deliver education and training services to foster care providers, community partners, and Children and Family Services staff for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This will increase department expenditures by $450,000, funded 100% by State 2011 Realignment revenues. BACKGROUND: CLPCCD has a successful history in providing an array of training and technical assistance to child welfare agencies and community partners as evidenced by partnerships with Alameda, Mendocino and Solano Counties. CLPCCD provides training to increase the skills and capacity of those who work directly with foster and adoptive children. Courses range from topics such as trauma informed care, Resource Family Pre-Approval training, Safety Organized Practice, professional development and new laws and initiatives impacting child welfare. This is an effort to expand expertise and knowledge of those individuals providing care and services to Contra Costa County children and youth placed in foster care. This contract contains mutual indemnification language. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 8-4961 or 812-6795 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: C. 61 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Chabot-Las Positas Community College District for Training Services to CFS Staff, Community Partners and Foster Care Providers CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Valuable education and training services will not be provided to those who work directly with foster and adoptive children. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This interagency agreement supports all five of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; 3) "Families that are Economically Self Sufficient"; 4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and 5) "Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families" by providing training to foster care providers. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #76-586-4 with SHC Services, Inc. (dba Supplemental Health Care), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000, to provide temporary medical staffing services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Detention Facility for the period July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 18, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-586-3 with SHC Services, Inc. (dba Supplemental Health Care) to provide temporary medical staffing services including licensed vocational nursing, physical therapists, certified medical assistants, and other ancillary classifications at CCRMC and Detention Facility for the period April 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. Approval of Contract #76-586-4 will allow Contractor to continue providing temporary medical staffing services at CCRMC and Detention Facility through June 30, 2021. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 62 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #76-586-4 with SHC Services, Inc. (dba Supplemental Health Care) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring medical staffing services at CCRMC and Detention Facility will not have access to Contractor’s services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Extension Agreement #72-085-2 with Bay Area Community Resources, a non-profit corporation, to extend the termination date from June 30, 2020 to September 30, 2020 with no change in the original payment limit of $310,707, to provide consultation and technical assistance to reduce and prevent the use of tobacco products among populations with high rates of smoking. FISCAL IMPACT: This Amendment is funded 100% by California Department of Public Health Grant. BACKGROUND: On March 29, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #72-085, with Bay Area Community Resources, to provide consultation and technical assistance to reduce and prevent the use of tobacco products among populations with high rates of smoking, for the period September 1, 2015 through June 30, 2020. Approval of Contract Extension Agreement #72-085-2 will allow the Contractor to continue providing consultation and technical assistance services through September 30, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 63 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Extension #72-085-2 with Bay Area Community Resources CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this extension is not approved, County will not have access to Contractor’s services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Extension Agreement #72-084-2 with Monument Impact, a non-profit corporation, to extend the termination date from June 30, 2020 to September 30, 2020 with no change in the original payment limit of $247,575, to provide consultation, training, education and evaluation of programs and policies to limit the sale of flavored tobacco near schools. FISCAL IMPACT: This Amendment is funded 100% by California Department of Public Health Grant. BACKGROUND: On April 12, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #72-084 with Monument Impact, to provide consultation, training, education and evaluation of programs and policies to limit the sale of flavored tobacco near schools, for the period September 1, 2015 through June 30, 2020. Approval of Contract Extension Agreement #72-084-2 will allow the Contractor to continue providing consultation and training services through September 30, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 64 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Extension #72-084-2 with Monument Impact CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this extension is not approved, County will not have access to Contractor’s services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Groupware Technology. Inc. in an amount not to exceed $1,999,950 for the purchase of VMWare software licenses and support for the period from June 30, 2020 through July 1, 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I Budget. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department (HSD) Information Technology (IT) unit utilizes VMWare server virtualization software across its multi-site Data Center infrastructure, to support all internal services including the ccLink Electronic Health Record (EHR) system, as welll as providing secure access to third-party medical providers and affiliates. The VMWare solution is the backbone that enables these services to function. VMWare also provides support for the software under the Support and Subscription Services Terms and Conditions dated June 1, 2016, between the County and VMWare. In 2016, the HSD IT unit upgraded its VMWare software and renewed support through VMWare's third-party reseller, Applied Computer Solutions. The HSD IT unit now needs to purchase additional software and pay for subsequent years of support. Groupware Technology, Inc. is an authorized third-party reseller of VMWare support APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Wilson, 925-335-8700 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Laura Cassell, Deputy cc: Patrick Wilson C. 65 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order for Groupware Technology, Inc. for VMWare Licenses Renewal BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and services. By entering into this five year agreement with Groupware, the County is saving $230,000-$280,000 a year in VMWare support fees compared to annual purchases of support services. The County may terminate the proposed contract if the board of supervisors does not appropriate funds in any fiscal year for the purchase of the VMWare support services. This purchase will allow for the continued support and maintenance of the Data Center environment as well as provide additional licenses for long-term expansion and scalability. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved, HSD will lose vendor-provided support and an ability to grow beyond existing limits. The servers housing our electronic health records system will no longer be upgradeable; downtime, technical flaws, and other maintenance-based issues will not receive support from the vendor. This may increase the potential for loss or corruption of patient data, and could lead to patient care issues and related emergencies. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Memorandum of Understanding #23-680 containing mutual indemnification with Mt. Diablo Unified School District, a government agency, to collaborate with County for youth enrolled in Contractor’s Mt. Diablo Youth Employment Services and Career Pathways Program to be placed in internships throughout the Health Services Department (HSD), for the period from June 1, 2020 through May 31, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this item. BACKGROUND: Under Memorandum of Understanding #23-680, Contractor will collaborate with County to place youth throughout HSD who are enrolled in Contractor’s Mt. Diablo Youth Employment Services and Career Pathways Program. This Memorandum of Understanding included mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this Contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, interns will not receive education and training services provided by County’s HSD. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 925-957-5403 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 66 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Memorandum of Understanding #23-680 with Mt. Diablo Unified School District RECOMMENDATION(S): CONSIDER accepting a preliminary needs assessment report on Psychiatric Emergency Services as recommended by Contra Costa County Grand Jury Report #1909 and approve a status update be completed in 120 days. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1909 titled “Contra Costa County Psychiatric Services: Improving Care for Children and Adolescents” was approved by the Grand Jury on May 22, 2019. This report was subsequently reviewed by the Board of Supervisors. Recommendation One of the report “The Board of Supervisors should consider directing Contra Costa Health Services to perform a comprehensive needs assessment that would include a redesign of Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES) facility that would separate children and adolescents from adult patients by June 30, 2020” was accepted by the Board of Supervisors who directed the Health Services Department to develop the report. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Suzanne Tavano, 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Adam Down C. 67 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Preliminary Needs Assessment on Psychiatric Emergency Services BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) >Due to COVID-19, the assessment with recommended actions has not been finalized. As a result of the pandemic, operational and treatment needs at PES require further consideration with respect to space needs. Additionally, the extent of the anticipated decline in the State budget due to the pandemic is unknown making concrete recommendations difficult at this time. The Health Services Department has provided the attached interim report and requests the final assessment, inclusive of recommendations, be provided within 120 days. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, the County’s response and recommendations provided in the needs assessment may not accurately reflect current budgetary considerations or may no longer be feasible. ATTACHMENTS Preliminary Report Contra Costa Health Services Needs Assessment of Psychiatric Emergency Services June, 2020 The Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1909 titled “Contra Costa County Psychiatric Services: Improving Care for Children and Adolescents” was approved by the Grand Jury on May 22, 2019 and filed with Anita Santos, Judge of the Superior Court on May 24, 2019. Recommendation One of the report was: “The Board of Supervisors should consider directing Contra Costa Health Services to perform a comprehensive needs assessment that would include a redesign of Psychiatric Emerge ncy Services (PES) facility that would separate children and adolescents from adult patients by June 30, 2020.” This recommendation was accepted by the Board and Contra Costa Health Services directed to complete the assessment. The following summary represents the findings o f the assessment completed to date. Due to COVID 19, the assessment inclusive of recommended actions has not been finalized. It is anticipated that County revenues will decline due to the pandemic’s impact on the State budget, but the extent currently is unknown. Additionally, COVID 19 has impacted operational and treatment aspects of PES which call for additional consideration of physical space modifications. Consequently, it is difficult to make concrete recommendations at this time . It is requested the Board accept this as an interim report and a status update be provided in 120 days. A wide range of data was analyzed to better understand utilization of PES services. This included annual and monthly services provided, age of clients, presenting problems, legal status, length of stay, disposition following discharge, and payor source. To date, analysis of the data results in several initial conclusions: 1. The re are significant periods of time when there are zero or very few youth on PES. This variable utilization would not support the establishment of a free -standing unit either at a separate location or within CCRMC. Crisis Stabilization services must meet minimum staffing ratios at all times regardless of census. Under-utilization would incur significant cost to the county due to lack of, or insufficient, reimbursement . This would pertain regardless of location so use of a separate unit within CCRMC, such as 4D, would not be financially sustainable. 2. The percentage of commercially insured youth served on PES is significant and highlights the absence of adequate crisis level care provided by commercial health plans. Contra Costa Health Services has filled that void, resulting in increased utilization of PES. 3. If all youth, including those w ith commercial insurance, are to be treated on PES, expanded bedroom and treatment area capacity is indicated. Currently youth are housed in distinct areas of PES with supplemental staff assigned to monitor their care, which meet s Medi -Cal requirements, the location of these distinct parts still requires youth to enter and exit the unit through adult service areas. Witnessing the high acuity and level of distress exhibited by some adult patients on the unit can increase anxiety and be traumatizing for the y outh. 4. Community, County, State agencies and commercial health insurers need to assist in more timely disposition from PES of the minors in their care. It has been demonstrated that some extended stays on PES serve to “hold” youth until community placement (non-hospital) options are available rather than need for crisis stabilization, which is an outpatient service not to exceed 24 hours. 5. Significantly more adults than youth are treated on PES. The period of time adults are detained on PES exceeds that of yo uth and they wait longer for access to an available inpatient hospital bed. 6. On average, there are 15 to 25 adults daily who require hospital care in excess of the available 23 beds at CCRMC’s inpatient psychiatric unit (4C). Out of necessity, these adults most often are hospitalized in facilities that are subject to the Federal IMD Exclusion rule which prohibits use of Medi -Cal funds for inpatient treatment. This rule does not apply to youth under 18 years old so use of hospitals other than CCRMC does not incur additional costs to the County. 7. Of the 1,688 visits to PES by youth, approximately 612 (36%) required admission to an inpatient psychiatric hospital . Of these 56% were Medi -Cal beneficiaries and 44% were commercially insured. This suggests the need for commercial insurers to assist in resolving capacity issues on PES and providing adequate access to inpatient care for their beneficiaries when needed. In summary, PES is a highly utilized service by all members of the community regardless of insurance type. It serves the function s of diverting persons experiencing significant behavioral health crisis from local hospital emergency departments, stabilizing crisis, developing plans for transition back to the community, and arranging for inpatient hospitalization when necessary. Given the number of Contra Costa residents in need of this level of service, PES often negatively is impacted by volume of clients and challenges with adequate access to other levels of care that impact length of stays. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the 2020/2021 North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan (Exhibit A), identifying the activities authorized to be funded with Mitigation Fee revenue and respective funding allocations for the period of July 1, 2020 through June 30, 2021, as recommended by the North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed action will not have an impact on the County’s General Fund. Mitigation Fee revenue is used to cover the costs incurred by the County and City for any activities (Strategies) authorized to be funded under the applicable North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan approved by the County and City of Richmond. Each annual Expenditure Plan includes a Contingency line item in the budget to serve as a cushion for potential revenue shortfalls, and staff proposed the amount recommended to be allocated to Contingency because it is believed sufficient for this purpose. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Justin Sullivan, (925) 674-7812 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 68 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:2020/2021 North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Expenditure Plan BACKGROUND: New Expenditure Plans must be approved by both the County Board of Supervisors and Richmond City Council to officially authorize use of North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee funding. The purpose of this North Richmond Mitigation Fee (NRMF) is to mitigate designated impacts resulting from the County- and City-approved land-use permits for the expanded Bulk Material Processing Center (BMPC) located in North Richmond. Summary of Recommended 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan At the NRMFC meeting on May 29, 2020, the Committee voted to recommend that the County Board of Supervisors and Richmond City Council approve a 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan that allocates funding from July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2021. The amount recommended to be allocated to a number of existing strategies have decreased due to reduced revenue projection for FY 2020/2021. The recommended 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan attached as Exhibit A incorporates the following changes: • Decreased the amount funded for Bulky Item Pick-ups & Disposal Vouchers (Strategy 1) • Decreased the dollar amount funded for County Code Enforcement (Strategy 5) • Decreased the amount funded for Illegal Dumping Law Enforcement (Strategy 6) • Decreased the amount funded for surveillance cameras (Strategy 7) • Provides funding to new City Code Enforcement (Strategy 8) • Renamed the strategy and narrowed the focus of community based projects, maintains consistent funding levels for the two remaining Community Clean-Up Projects (Strategy 10) • Renamed the strategy and incorporated one community based garden project previously funded under a different strategy, maintains consistent funding levels for both Garden Projects (Strategy 13) • New strategy for City administered community based project previously funded under a different strategy, maintains consistent funding level for Love North Richmond project (Strategy 14) • New strategy for City administered community based project previously funded under a different strategy, maintains consistent funding level for Mobile Tool Library project (Strategy 15) • Decreased the amount allocated to Committee Administration/Staffing • Decreased the amount allocated to the Contingency line item proportionate to the reduction in total projected revenue for FY 2020/2021 All other strategies remain unchanged. Specific nonprofit administered projects recommended to be funded under Strategies 10 and 13 as well as the City administered projects recommended to be funded under Strategies 14 and 15 were originally selected through the Request for Funding Proposal process conducted in 2018. The nonprofit organizations/projects proposed to be funded under Strategies 10 and 13 are shown in Attachments 2 and 4 of the Expenditure Plan respectively. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Each new Expenditure Plan must receive final approval from the County Board of Supervisors and Richmond City Council. Expenditure Plans and any associated amendments recommended or approved by the NRMFC only take effect if/when approved by the Board of Supervisors and the Richmond City Council. Therefore, if the 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan is not approved by the Board prior to July 1, 2020 the previously approved strategies (activities) could not be funded by NRMF in which case, most if not all, would not continue being implemented without interruption. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A - 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee 2020/21 Expenditure Plan The Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee was established as a result of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (EIR) dated November 2003 for the WCCSL Bulk Materials Processing Center (BMPC) and Related Actions (Project). The Project involved new and expanded processing and resource recovery operations on both the incorporated and unincorporated area of the Project site, which the EIR concluded would impact the host community. To mitigate this impact Mitigation Measure 4-5 called for a Mitigation Fee to benefit the host community, described as follows: “Mitigation Fee. The facility operator shall pay a Mitigation Fee of an amount to be determined by the applicable permitting authority(ies) to defray annual costs associated with collection and disposal of illegally dumped waste and associated impacts in North Richmond and adjacent areas. The mitigation fee should be subject to the joint-control of the City and County and should be collected on all solid waste and processible materials received at the facility consistent with the existing mitigation fee collected at the Central IRRF.” In July 2004, the City of Richmond and Contra Costa County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreeing to jointly administer Mitigation Fee monies collected from the BMPC for the benefit of the incorporated and unincorporated North Richmond area. This North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee (Committee) was formed pursuant to the terms of the MOU for the specific purpose of preparing a recommended Expenditure Plan. This Expenditure Plan provides a means to jointly administer the Mitigation Fee funding for the benefit of the host community, as described in the EIR. The Expenditure Plan is subject to final approval of the Richmond City Council and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors. By approving this Expenditure Plan, the City Council and Board of Supervisors authorize the use of Mitigation Fee funding for only the purposes and in the amounts specified herein. The City and County have each designated their respective staff persons responsible for administering the development and implementation of the approved Expenditure Plan, which includes responsibility for drafting and interpreting Expenditure Plan language. However, the City and County have not delegated to the Committee or to staff the authority to expend funding for purposes not clearly identified in the Expenditure Plan document officially approved by their respective decision-making bodies. Activities which can be funded in this Expenditure Plan period with the Mitigation Fee amounts specified within this Expenditure Plan are described herein as “Strategies” or “Staff Costs”. Strategies are categorized as either “Core Services” or “Supplemental Enhancements”. Core Services includes the higher funding priority strategies that most directly address the intended purpose of this City/County approved Mitigation Fee, “to defray annual costs associated with collection and disposal of illegally dumped waste and associated impacts in North Richmond”. All references to the “Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area” or “Mitigation Fee Funding Area” pertain to the geographic area shown in the attached map (Attachment 4). Expenditure Plan Period: July 1, 2020 - June 30, 2021 (unless otherwise specified herein) 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan - North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee - Page 2 of 13 - BUDGET The funding allocation amounts included in this document apply to the Expenditure Plan Period specified on the first page unless otherwise specified herein. The total amount of funding allocated in the Expenditure Plan Budget is based on revenue projections provided by the BMPC operator, Republic Service, which are dependent upon multiple variables (e.g. number of tons of recovered materials vs. solid waste, per ton gate rate charged and amount of CPI- adjusted per ton Mitigation Fee). Actual Mitigation Fee revenue may deviate from revenue projections provided by Republic and used to prepare this Budget. A “Contingency” line item is included in the Budget to help accommodate variations between projected and actual revenue. Excess funding allocated to strategies and not expended by the end of each Expenditure Plan period is treated as “roll-over” funding for reallocation in a subsequent Expenditure Plan period. The Budget includes some line items that are based on fixed costs, however there are other line items which are scalable and/or dependent on utilization thereby providing flexibility to reallocate amounts if and when a significant need is identified. Allocated funding may remain unspent due to under-utilization of a particular program. If the amount allocated to a particular line item is determined to exceed needs based upon usage, the remaining funding can only be reallocated by officially amending the Expenditure Plan. This Expenditure Plan may only be adjusted upon official action taken by both the City and County. Although there has been some interest in allowing flexibility for staff to adjust funding allocations under specific circumstances, the authority to approve or modify the Expenditure Plan rests solely with the City Council and Board of Supervisors. Annual fiscal year Expenditure Plan cycle is expected to reduce margin of error of Mitigation Fee revenue projects, streamline financial reconciliation/budgeting process and minimize need to amend Expenditure Plans mid-cycle. Amending Expenditure Plans involve administrative burden and costs due to the joint approval needed from both the Richmond City Council and County Board of Supervisors. In order to minimize the amount of funding needed to cover staff costs incurred to amend the Expenditure Plan, staff will only recommend changes to the Expenditure Plan when necessary to address a significant and time-sensitive need. NORTH RICHMOND MITIGATION FEE EXPENDITURE PLAN BUDGET #Expenditure Plan (EP) Strategy (EP Cycle: July 1, 2020 thru June 30, 2021) Recommended Budget Allocations for 2020/2021 1 Bulky Item Pick-ups & Disposal Vouchers 1,000.00$ 2 Neighborhood Clean-ups 30,000.00$ 3 Prevention Services Coordinator 50,726.75$ 4 City/County Right-of-Way Pick-ups 30,000.00$ 5 Code Enforcement - County 91,850.60$ 6 Illegal Dumping Law Enforcement 175,814.30$ 7 Surveillance Cameras 1,500.00$ 8 Code Enforcement - City 26,666.67$ 9 Community Services Coordinator $ 90,909.09 10 Community Clean-Up Projects (See Attachment 2)48,811.53$ 11 North Richmond Green Community Service Programs 20,042.00$ 12 North Richmond Green Campaign 10,500.00$ 13 Garden Projects (See Attachment 4)48,179.79$ 14 Love North Richmond 17,490.00$ 15 Mobile Tool Lending Library 18,050.00$ Contingency (10% of Projected Revenue)68,105.45$ Subtotal (without Committee Staffing)729,646.18$ X Committee Administration/Staffing 100,000.00$ Total Projected Revenue in 2020/21 (July 1, 2020 thru June 30, 2021) 681,054.50$ 151,925.01$ 829,646.18$ Core ServicesSupplemental EnhancementsRoll-over Funding from Prior EP Cycle(s) Total 2020/21 Expenditure Plan Budget - Page 3 of 12 - 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan - North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee - Page 4 of 13 - DESCRIPTION OF STRATEGIES RECOMMENDED FOR FUNDING Funding allocation amounts for each strategy are specified in the Budget table on page 3. The following Strategies describe the activities allowed to be funded with the amounts allocated to each in the Budget (associated allowable agency staff costs are described in the Staff Costs section). Strategies are grouped based on relative funding priority levels and the “Core Services” category contains higher priority Strategies than the “Supplemental Enhancements” category. Higher funding priority Strategies are those which best address the Fee’s intended purpose, “to defray annual costs associated with collection and disposal of illegally dumped waste and associated impacts in North Richmond”) and “Supplemental Enhancements”. Level 1 Priority - PRIMARY CORE SERVICES STRATEGIES • 1 - Bulky Item Pick-ups & Disposal Vouchers • 2 - Neighborhood Clean-up Events • 4 - City/County Right-of-Way Trash & Tagging Removal • 5 - Code Enforcement - County • 6 - Illegal Dumping Law Enforcement • 8 - Code Enforcement – City Level 2 Priority - SECONDARY CORE SERVICES STRATEGIES • 3 - Prevention Services Coordinator • 7 - Surveillance Cameras Level 3 Priority - PRIMARY SUPPLEMENTAL ENHANCEMENTS STRATEGIES • 9 - Community Services Coordinator • 11 - North Richmond Green Community Services Program • 12 - North Richmond Green Campaign • 13 - Garden Project • 14 - Love North Richmond • 15 - Mobile Tool Lending Library Level 4 Priority - SECONDARY SUPPLEMENTAL ENHANCEMENTS STRATEGIES • 10 - Community Clean-up Projects CORE SERVICES 1. Bulky Item Pick-ups & Disposal Vouchers Provide residents in the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area, who prove eligibility consistent with City/County procedures, with the option of choosing to: o Request up to one on-call pick-up service per household per calendar year for bulky items that are not accepted in the current on-call clean-ups through Richmond Sanitary Service (RSS), only available to those with an active account with RSS; or 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan - North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee - Page 5 of 13 - 1 Administering agency contracting charge applies ($3,000 per contract) o Request up to twelve $5 vouchers per household for disposal at Republic’s transfer station on Parr Blvd. per calendar year (vouchers expire after six months, Mitigation Fees only pay for vouchers that are actually redeemed). [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agency: City of Richmond Implementing Entity(ies): Community Housing Development Corporation (processes requests and issues Disposal Vouchers/arranges Bulky Item Pick-ups) Republic Services - Golden Bear Transfer Station & Richmond Sanitary Service (reimbursed for Disposal Vouchers redeemed and Bulky Item Pick-ups provided) Reporting/Payment Requirements: Effective July 1, 2012, CHDC and Republic Services shall provide required data pertinent to Strategy 1 based upon the strategy-specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF-funded payments. 2. Neighborhood Clean-ups Provide at least one neighborhood and/or creek clean-up event in the Mitigation Fee Funding Area; additional clean-up event may be scheduled as funding allows. [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agency: City of Richmond Implementing Entity(ies): City Manager’s Office (coordinates scheduling of clean-up dates and associated arrangements in conjunction with partner entities) Republic Services - Richmond Sanitary Service (reimbursed for providing/servicing clean-up boxes and disposing of debris placed in clean-up boxes) Reporting/Payment Requirements: Effective July 1, 2012, the City Manager’s Office and Republic Services shall provide required data pertinent to Strategy 2 based upon the strategy-specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF-funded payments (funding transfers). 3. Prevention Services Coordinator Fund at least a portion of a Prevention Services Coordinator (PSC) position (including salary/benefits/overhead and administering agency contracting charge1) on a contract basis to assist the City and County in implementing Strategy 1 as the point of contact for community members interested in claiming Disposal Vouchers 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan - North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee - Page 6 of 13 - or Bulky-Item Pick ups. Assist community members interested in reporting illegal dumping and seeking referral/resources. Track and report data related to illegally dumped waste collected by Republic Services Hot Spot Crew and handle associated referrals to applicable public agencies, including right-of-way referrals for Strategy 4. The PSC may also assist City and County with administering funding allocated to selected non-profit organizations under Strategies 10 and 13. [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agency: Contra Costa County Implementing Entity: Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDC) (reimbursed actual cost for part-time position and issues Disposal Vouchers/arranges Bulky Item Pick-ups) Reporting/Payment Requirements: Effective July 1, 2012, CHDC shall provide required data pertinent to Strategy 1 and Strategy 3 based upon the strategy- specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF-funded payments. 4. City/County Right-of-Way Pick-up & Tagging Abatement Fund consolidated pick-up program (including personnel, mileage, equipment rental and administrative costs) for removal of illegal dumping and tagging abatement* in the public right-of-way located within the unincorporated & incorporated Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area. Additional tasks would include identifying potential sites for Strategy 10 Clean-Up Projects. Funding is intended to pay for removal of illegal dumping that occurs as a result of referrals from the Prevention Services Coordinator for items/debris not collected by the designated Republic Services Hot Spot Route crew. [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agency: City of Richmond Implementing Entity: Richmond Police Department’s Code Enforcement Division Reporting/Payment Requirements: Effective July 1, 2012, the Richmond Police Department’s Code Enforcement Division shall provide required data pertinent to Strategy 4 based upon the strategy-specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF- funded payments (funding transfers). 5. Code Enforcement Staff - County Fund at least a portion of County code enforcement position (including salary/benefits and related vehicle and equipment costs), to assist with vacant/ abandoned lot abatements and fencing as well as other health/building/zoning violations related to illegal dumping and blight throughout the unincorporated 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan - North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee - Page 7 of 13 - Mitigation Funding Area. Additional tasks would include identifying potential sites for Strategy 10 Clean-Up Projects. [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agency: Contra Costa County Implementing Entity: County Department of Conservation & Development’s Building Inspection Division Reporting/Payment Requirements: Effective July 1, 2012, the County Department of Conservation & Development’s Building Inspection Division shall provide required data pertinent to Strategy 5 based upon the strategy-specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF-funded payments (funding transfers). 6. Illegal Dumping Law Enforcement Fund majority of a full-time Sheriff Deputy (between approximately 90-100% of salary/benefits, overtime, uniform and related cell phone, equipment, and vehicle costs) to assist with law enforcement investigations and patrols to combat illegal dumping within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area. Additional tasks would include identifying potential sites for Strategy 10 Clean-Up Projects. [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agency: Contra Costa County Implementing Entity: County Sheriff’s Office Reporting/Payment Requirements: Effective July 1, 2012, the County Sheriff’s Office shall provide required data pertinent to this Strategy based upon the strategy-specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF-funded payments (funding transfers). 7. Surveillance Cameras Fund the cost of cameras, camera infrastructure, camera signage and costs related to monitoring, maintenance, warranty, repair & relocation of surveillance camera system equipment within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area. Cameras will be used to assist the dedicated Illegal Dumping Law Enforcement officer prevent dumping in targeting specific locations where illegal dumping occurs most regularly. [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agency: Contra Costa County Implementing Entity(ies): 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan - North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee - Page 8 of 13 - Richmond Police Department (operate, move and maintain eight Pan-Tilt-Zoom wireless video surveillance cameras and associated camera system infrastructure throughout NR -AND- install/clean/move FlashCam cameras located within the incorporated NR area if funding is available) County Sheriff’s Department (coordinate monitoring of FlashCams or other camera systems located throughout NR and identify/request relocation of surveillance cameras throughout NR as needed) County Public Works Department (install/clean/move FlashCam or other camera systems cameras located within the unincorporated NR area upon request if funding is available) Reporting/Payment Requirements: Effective July 1, 2012, each Implementing Entity shall provide required data pertinent to each entity’s applicable Strategy 7 responsibilities based upon the strategy-specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF- funded payments (funding transfers) now or in the future. 8. Code Enforcement Staff - City Fund at least a portion of City code enforcement position (including salary/benefits and related vehicle and equipment costs), to assist with vacant/ abandoned lot abatements and fencing as well as other health/building/zoning violations related to illegal dumping and blight throughout the incorporated Mitigation Funding Area. Additional tasks would include identifying potential sites for Strategy 10 Clean-Up Projects. [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agency: City of Richmond Implementing Entity: City Department of Infrastructure Maintenance & Operations Reporting/Payment Requirements: Effective July 1, 2020, the City Department of Infrastructure Maintenance & Operations shall provide required data pertinent to Strategy 8 based upon the strategy-specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF- funded payments (funding transfers). SUPPLEMENTAL ENHANCEMENTS 9. Community Services Coordinator Fund at least a portion of a Community Services Coordinator (CSC) position to be staffed on a contract basis (including salary/benefits/overhead and administering agency contracting charge2). The CSC shall: • serve as a link between the community of North Richmond, the City of Richmond, and Contra Costa County for issues related to beautification, 2Administering agency contracting charge is $3,000 per contract. 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan - North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee - Page 9 of 13 - illegal dumping, and blight using referral process identified by the City and County; • coordinate outreach activities related to illegal dumping and beautification within the Primary Funding area, as specified by the City/County, including North Richmond Green community service programs and outreach activities described under Strategies 11 & 12; and • Identifying potential sites for Strategy 10 Clean-Up Projects. • be bilingual in order to assist with Spanish translation as needed. [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agency: Contra Costa County Implementing Entity: Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDC). Reporting/Payment Requirements: CHDC shall provide required data pertinent to Strategies 9, 11 & 12 based upon the strategy-specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF-funded payments. 10. Community Clean-up Projects Fund the implementation, oversight and administering agency contracting charges3 of community clean-up projects with specific focus on reducing blight. Community clean-up projects may involve the removal of debris and/or landscaping maintenance. Sites to be cleaned shall be in the Mitigation Fee Funding area and designated by the Administering Agency. The number of sites to be cleaned will be determined by the amount of funding allocated. A breakdown of contracting costs and amount awarded to the Implementing Entity is contained in the Community Clean-up Project Table included as Attachment 2. Up to 15% of the Implementing Entity’s Award Amount in Attachment 2 may be used for a fiscal sponsor or administrative oversight. [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agency: Contra Costa County. Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDC) may under contract with the County as an Administering Agency, administer Community Clean-Up Project contracts funded under this Strategy. CHDC shall use no more than twenty (20) percent (%) of the total amount awarded to each Community Clean-Up Project (after subtracting City/County contracting cost) listed in Attachment 2 to oversee project implementation, including facilitating review/assessment of reports’ and deliverables. Payments to Implementing Entities for Community Clean-Up Projects shall not be issued by CHDC without the written approval of City and County Committee Staff. 3Administering agency contracting charge is $3,000 per contract entered into by the County and up to 20% of the per project funding allocation as described in Administering Agencies section below). 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan - North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee - Page 10 of 13 - 4 Administering agency contracting charge applies ($3,000 per contract) Implementing Entity: See Community Clean-up Project Table in Attachment 2 Reporting/Payment Requirements: Any Community Clean-Up Projects shall be subject to the Reporting & Invoicing Requirements specified in the template Memorandum of Understanding included in Attachment 1. Attachment 1 only applies to Community Clean-Up Project contracts with the Implementing Entities. The County will issue advance payments to CHDC, as needed, to ensure there is adequate funding available for payments requested by Implementing Entities if and when authorized by City and County Staff. Additionally, CHDC would be subject to contractual payment and reporting provisions that differ from those in Attachment 1 due to the nature of the services to be provided. 11. North Richmond Green Community Services Programs Fund the following North Richmond Green programs on a contract basis4 to the extent the specific details submitted are determined to align with the purpose of the Mitigation Fee and Expenditure Plan: • NR Little League Baseball Program - Includes cost of registration and uniforms with customized North Richmond Green patches for up to 5-6 teams, season kick-off event/parade, equipment, stipends for game monitoring and oversight, food and transportation. • NR Youth Twilight Basketball Program - Includes cost of registration and uniforms with North Richmond Green patches for up to 5-6 teams, equipment, stipends for game monitoring and oversight, food and transportation. • NR Eco Workshops & Beautification Projects – Eco Workshops and Beautification Projects include school gardens, recycling efforts, beach/creek/neighborhood clean-ups and ecological field trips. May fund the cost of materials, transportation and fees associated with pre-approved community beautification projects such landscaping and murals. [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agency: Contra Costa County Implementing Entity: Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDC). Reporting/Payment Requirements: CHDC shall provide required data pertinent to Strategies 9, 11 & 12 based upon the strategy-specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF-funded payments. 12. North Richmond Green Campaign Fund the design, printing and/or distribution of education and outreach materials on a contract basis4 which must align with the purpose of the Mitigation Fee and Expenditure Plan and be pre-approved by Committee Staff. Outreach materials must include “Jointly funded by City of Richmond & Contra Costa County” unless otherwise specified herein. Outreach materials may be any of the types specified below, however must clearly intend to directly: 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan - North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee - Page 11 of 13 - • Inform the community about Mitigation Fee funded programs/efforts, • Increase participation in Mitigation funded programs/efforts, • Reduce illegal dumping and blight in the Mitigation Fee Funding Area, and/or • Promote beautification in the Mitigation Fee Funding Area. The following type of outreach material expenditures may be funded if reviewed and pre-approved by Committee Staff: • STIPENDS – Pay local community members (youth and adults) to distribute printed outreach materials door-to-door to promote mitigation-funded strategies (Jointly Funded text not applicable to stipend expenses, only materials) • HANDOUTS/MAILERS – Newsletters, flyers, brochures or other documents intended to be handed out or mailed to local residents/organizations. • T-SHIRTS - Shirts shall include the NRGreen.org website to encourage people to learn more about Mitigation funded programs/efforts (local phone number should also be included when possible, however inclusion of Jointly Funded text may not be required) • NR GREEN FESTIVAL – Event held once per year and generally include information booths to raise awareness about mitigation-funded efforts and other local beautification efforts as well as fun activities for kids and food. Materials promoting the event shall include the NRGreen.org website as well as a local phone number. • SIGNAGE – Printed or manufactured signage, which includes promotional banners for local events/parades, which should include the NRGreen.org website for Community members to learn more about Mitigation funded programs/efforts. Repair, replacement and removal of NRMF-funded Light Pole Banners. [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agency: Contra Costa County Implementing Entity: Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDC). Reporting/Payment Requirements: CHDC shall provide required data pertinent to Strategies 9, 11 & 12 based upon the strategy-specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF-funded payments. 13. Garden Projects Community Garden Projects: Fund on-going maintenance and up-keep of existing community gardens within the Primary Funding Area. The projects selected under this Strategy has been funded on an on-going basis. Garden Retrofit Projects: Fund the development and implementation of educational garden retrofit events within the Primary Funding Area. Sites for garden retrofits shall be selected via an application process administered by the implementing 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan - North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee - Page 12 of 13 - 5 Administering agency contracting charge applies ($3,000 per contract) Entity and approved by County/City staff. Garden retrofit applications will be ranked based on the applicant’s ability/willingness to maintain the garden after installation, the visibility of the site from the street, and the size of the garden site. The number of garden sites to be retrofitted will be determined by the amount of funding allocated. Garden retrofits shall contain drought-tolerant, native plants. Details, including recommended allocation amounts, for Projects are included in Attachment 4. Up to 15% of the Non-Profit Implementer Award Amount specified in Attachment 4 may be used for administrative oversite. [See “Staff Costs” section for agency activities that may also be funded under this Strategy.] Administering Agencies: Contra Costa County.5 Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDC) may under contract with the County as the Administering Agency, administer Community Garden & Garden Retrofit contracts funded under this Strategy. CHDC shall use no more than twenty (20) percent (%) of the total amount awarded to each Project to oversee project implementation, including facilitating review/assessment of reports and deliverables. Payments to Implementing Entities for Community Garden & Garden Retrofit Projects shall not be issued by CHDC without the written approval of both City and County Committee Staff. Implementing Entity: Various Non-Profit Organizations (see Garden Projects Table in Attachment 4) Reporting/Payment Requirements: Any Garden Project contracts issued or amended by the City/County shall incorporate Reporting & Invoicing Requirements equivalent with those shown in Attachment 3. Garden Project contracts being administered by CHDC on behalf of the County shall also incorporate Reporting & Invoicing Requirements equivalent with those shown in Attachment 3. Attachment 3 only applies to the Garden Project contracts with the Implementing Entities. CHDC would be subject to contractual payment and reporting provisions that differ from those in Attachment 3 due to the nature of the services to be provided. The County will issue advance payments to CHDC, as needed, to ensure there is adequate funding available to payments requested by Implementing Entities if and when authorized by City and County Staff. 14. Love North Richmond Fund the development and implementation of community beautification projects and senior yard beautification projects within the Primary Funding Area to help prevent illegal dumping and reduce blight (including personnel/labor, printed materials for outreach, food and transportation for volunteers, beautification supplies and equipment not available in the Tool Lending Library). Administering Agency: City of Richmond Implementing Entity: City of Richmond Community Services Department 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan - North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee - Page 13 of 13 - Reporting/Payment Requirements: Effective July 1, 2020, the City of Richmond Community Services Department shall provide required data pertinent to Strategy 14 based upon the strategy-specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF-funded payments (funding transfers). 15. Mobile Tool Lending Library Fund the development, implementation, and on-going maintenance of a mobile tool lending library that is accessible to the public within the Mitigation Fee Primary Funding Area. Funding is intended to pay for the purchase of educational material, tools, costs related to the tool lending system & trailer/tool maintenance, and personnel/labor. Administering Agency: City of Richmond Implementing Entity: City of Richmond Community Services Department Reporting/Payment Requirements: Effective July 1, 2020, the City of Richmond Community Services Department shall provide required data pertinent to Strategy 15 based upon the strategy-specific invoicing/reporting requirements and schedule developed/maintained by Committee Staff in order to receive NRMF-funded payments (funding transfers). STAFF COSTS Committee Administration/Staffing Funding: The funding allocated for Committee Administration/Staffing may not be adequate to cover the full cost of staff time necessary for jointly staffing the North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee as well as developing, administering and overseeing this Expenditure Plan for the specified period. Supplemental funding allocation may be necessary upon determining actual costs exceed the amount budgeted to cover the intended City/County costs for joint staffing. Strategy-Specific Funding: The cost of City/County staff time spent providing direct implementation assistance and/or coordination for specific Strategies may be covered with a portion of the NRMF funding budgeted for each applicable Strategy. Additionally, a portion of the NRMF funding budgeted for Strategies will be used to pay fixed administering agency contracting charge for each applicable contract (Currently $3,000 per contract. An additional $3,000 may be added to a contract amendment to add additional funding or nonprofits to a contract during an existing contract cycle) unless otherwise specified herein. G:\Conservation\Deidra\Illegal Dumping\BMPC Mitigation Fee Committee\_EPs\2019-2020 Exp Plan\Amended 2019-20 EP\2019- 20 NRMF EP.doc Page 1 of 6 TEMPLATE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN AND COMMUNITY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION This is an agreement made and executed on _______ between Community Housing Development Corporation (CHDC) and _______ (Contractor). This contract will remain in effect for the time period identified in the TERM section of the agreement. OVERVIEW: The _________ North Richmond Mitigation Fee (NRMF) Expenditure Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors in ______ and Richmond City Council in _______ allocates a total of _______ to the Contractor for the disbursement of funds within Strategy 10 to complete Clean-Up Project(s) in the North Richmond Mitigation Area. TERM: The term of this agreement begins on _______ and ends on _______. Contractor will complete all work performed under this agreement not later than ________. Invoices submitted for work performed before or after this specified term and invoices submitted after _______will not be paid. I. Contractor’s Obligations The Contractor shall administer the _________, as described herein for an amount not to exceed ________ involving the following activities: A. Recruit and Hire _____ workers 1. Contractor will develop and publicize the job announcements. Job announcements shall contain, “Jointly funded by The City of Richmond & Contra Costa County” language. 2. Contractor will interview, select and hire up to ______ workers. 3. Contractor will host training for new hires that discusses the proper procedures of disposal of hazardous waste (televisions, phones, batteries, tires, paint etc.). Task A - Deliverables: 1. Documentation of publicized job announcement in English/Spanish with required jointly funded language. 2. Documentation of hiring papers. B. Clean up to __ North Richmond Sites Approved by the County 1. Contractor shall select North Richmond addresses provided by the County or City to be cleaned during each clean up. a. Addresses provided by the County or City will include a description of waste onsite. b. Addresses provided by the County or City shall only be selected once for clean-up unless directed otherwise by County Staff. 2. Contractor will confirm with the County the address for cleanup one week and provide clear written procedures for the proper disposal of all waste types previously described at each clean-up site, including waste that is recyclable, hazardous or requires special handling. Procedures shall be submitted and approved by the County before the site is cleaned up. Attachment 1 Page 2 of 6 3. Contractor shall make arrangements in advance with the appropriate partners for the proper removal, recycling, composting or disposal of the debris identified in the area to be cleaned, including materials that require special handling such as tires, hazardous/universal wastes, appliances, and medical sharps/waste. 4. Contractor shall document approximate quantities (count, volume or weight) of each type of material/debris removed from the area during clean-up, using a log or other method agreed upon in advance. 5. Contractor shall demonstrate how the materials/debris removed during the clean-up were transported and where each type was properly recycled, composted or disposed. Task B - Deliverables: 1. Documentation of disposal procedures approved by the County for each confirmed clean-up address. 2. Before photos of the entire site before the material/debris has been cleaned up. 3. Completed Contractor’s Log identifying the types and amount of material/debris removed. 4. After photos of the entire site after it has been cleaned up. Contractor shall strive to take After photos from the same vantage points as the Before photos. 5. Documentation demonstrating that the material/debris removed was properly disposed or recycled. If debris removed during the clean-up is disposed of in existing containers that are routinely serviced by Republic Services, Contractor shall submit copy of an invoice or letter from Republic Services confirming what collection services were being provided at the disposal location during the applicable timeframe. For any in-kind hauling/disposal service offered by partner organizations or agencies, contractor may submit written communication identifying what was picked up by whom and where it was taken (e.g. e- mail message from the Parks District confirming that yard debris that was placed in tarps and set-out at agreed upon location was placed in designated green waste bin on the District’s property or transported to a specified compost facility). Alternatively, if disposal services are provided in the form of debris box donation(s) from Republic Services, contractor may submit written communication confirming donation. C. Attend Community Meetings and Events 1. Attend one North Richmond Green meeting(s) per quarter (quarterly periods end on December 31st, March 31st and June 30th). a. No portion of the Quarterly Meeting Attendance budget line item will be paid to Contractor unless Contractor submits written evidence proving Contractor representative attended at least one monthly North Richmond Green Meeting during the applicable quarter. Task C - Deliverables: 1. Documented attendance via minutes or copies of sign-in sheets of North Richmond Green meetings D. Reporting & Invoicing 1. Submit invoices and the required supporting documentation (including applicable required Deliverables and completed Progress Reports as specified in Section III. Payment Provisions) for each calendar month, and not later than 30 days after the end of the applicable monthly period. The Reporting and Invoicing budget line items are intended to ensure timely submittal of invoices and required supporting documentation. No portion of the Invoicing budget line item will be paid to Contractor for invoices submitted late, or without the required documentation or completed Progress Report. Page 3 of 6 Task D- Deliverables: 1. Complete monthly invoices on time for all tasks completed, accompanied by all required deliverables (including completed Progress Report or Final Progress Report). If Contractor does not provide a timely and complete invoice with all deliverables required for applicable tasks outlined on the invoice, as specified herein, no later than 30 days after the end of the applicable monthly period, the Contractor shall forfeit the $100 allocated for each applicable invoice period. Contractor may not use any funding specifically allocated for Reporting and Invoicing for any other purpose 2. Completed Progress Report addressing activities that occurred during the corresponding invoice period (except for the final invoice) consistent with Section III.3.a. 3. Completed Final Progress Report addressing the entire project to be submitted with the final invoice consistent with Section III.3.a. Page 4 of 6 E. Eligible Costs: Eligible costs consistent with the below table can only be reimbursed if included on invoices in conformance with the payment provisions and submitted prior to _______. Budget Line Items by Task/Deliverable Quantity Payment per Unit Total Payments Budget Amount A. Recruit and hire ____ workers $ - Deliverable 1 - Recruitment Documentation 1 each $301.39 $301.39 Deliverable 2 - Hiring Documentation - each $341 $- B. Clean-up up to _____ (_) designated locations in the NRMF Funding Area $ - Deliverable 1 - Procedures - each $100 $- Deliverable 2 - Before Photos - each $300 $- Deliverable 3 - Contractors Log - each $400 $- Deliverable 4 - After Photos - each $300 $- Deliverable 5 - Disposal Documentation - each $150 $- C. Attend North Richmond Green Meetings $ - Deliverable 1 - NR Green Meetings - each $250 $- D. Reporting and Invoicing $ - Deliverable 1 - Timely & Complete Invoice - each $100 $- Deliverable 2 - Progress Reports - each $150 $- Deliverable 3 - Final Progress Report 1 each $400 $400 SUBTOTAL $ - Fiscal Agent (10% of amount invoiced) $0 TOTAL BUDGET & ALLOWABLE PAYMENTS $ - II. CHDC’s Obligations Subject to the payment limit of _______ CHDC shall reimburse Contractor for eligible costs described in the previous section where such are incurred in the performance of work under the contract, subject to the below Payment Provisions. CHDC will disburse Contractor funds only after receiving written approval by County Page 5 of 6 authorizing the disbursement of the Contractor grant funds based on approved budget, approved advance and request for reimbursement. III. Payment Provisions Contractor shall submit invoices and required deliverables on a monthly basis consistent with the amounts and frequency specified in Section I.E -Eligible Costs, which together may not total more than _______. Contractor will only receive payment for eligible costs incurred for work performed during the term of this contract which are itemized on invoices substantiated with adequate supporting documentation. Invoices submitted after July 30, - _______ will not be paid. 1. Advanced Payments: In order to receive any potential advance payment, such must be authorized for the specified project in Attachment ____ of the Expenditure Plan approved by the Board of Supervisors and The City of Richmond. Advance payment is limited to no more than ten (10) percent (%) of the approved implemented Entity Award for the Project. Contractor shall submit a written request to CHDC for approval by City and County Committee staff detailing the reason(s) advance payment is necessary and itemizing each specific cost that the requested advance payment amount would pay for and how such costs will aid in the completion of each applicable required task. Advance payment requests must be submitted prior to any other invoice. If an advance payment is issued, Contractor shall not be eligible for an additional payment until enough required deliverables have been approved to offset the amount paid in advance. 2. Partial Payments: The Contracting entity (City of County) may authorize partial payment to Contractor for submittal of incomplete deliverables if solely incomplete due to unusual and unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of the Contractor. Contractor must submit written request asking to receive payment for incomplete deliverable containing an explanation as to what factors beyond the Contractor’s control specifically precluded the Contractor from submitting the completed deliverable and why such could not have been foreseen or avoided by Contractor. 3. Invoices: Invoices shall be submitted monthly, no later than 30 days after the end of the applicable monthly period and contain the following information in sufficient detail and be submitted in a form which adequately demonstrates consistency with this contract. Invoices shall be accompanied by the applicable deliverables. a. Itemization of any tasks completed during the applicable calendar month for which completed deliverables are submitted and associated payment is being requested. 4. Supported Documentation: The following required supporting documentation must be submitted with invoices when applicable as described below. a. Every invoice must be accompanied by a Progress Report, with the exception of the final invoice which must be accompanied by a Final Report. Both types of Reports must contain all of the information specified in the City/County provided Report templates, as well as any applicable details specified above in Section I. Contractor’s Obligations. Page 6 of 6 b. All applicable Deliverables associated with the tasks and requested payment amounts itemized on each monthly invoice. SIGNATURES: Executed on the dates and by the persons named below. Date: ____________________________ Date: _________________________________ By: _________________________________ By: ___________________________________ Name: _______________________________ Name: ________________________________ IV. Conflict of Interest By signing below, Contractor agrees not to employ, subcontract with, or make payment to any person (employees and stipend recipients), for the purpose of implementing this Project, that is at the same time employed by Contra Costa County, the City of Richmond or any entity that receives NRMF funding from the County or the City of Richmond, or serves on the NRMF Committee, except upon written approval by the Department of Conservation and Development Director or his designee. Signature:________________________________________________________________ Name: __________________________________________________________________ Title: ___________________________________________________________________ Date: ___________________________ G:\Conservation\Deidra\Illegal Dumping\BMPC Mitigation Fee Committee\_EPs\2020-2021 Exp Plan\JS Draft\Attachment 1 Implementing Entity / Fiscal Sponsor (if applicable) Project Title Advance Payment Allowed (Up to 10% of Implementer Award Amount) Requested Amount Total Award Amount County Contracting Costs2 CHDC Contracting Cost (20%) to Manage Non- Profits2 Non-Profit Implementer Award Amount for Project Notes Social Progress Inc.Brighter Beginnings in North Richmond Yes $ 29,999.76 $ 28,038.03 $ 1,723.24 $ 5,262.96 $ 21,051.83 Men & Women of Valor Community Working Together Yes $ 20,000.00 $ 20,773.50 $ 1,276.76 $ 3,899.35 $ 15,597.39 $ 49,999.76 $ 48,811.53 $ 3,000.00 $ 9,162.31 $ 36,649.22 Total Funding Requested/Allocated 1 Funding Request Proposal released on February 9, 2018 by Committee Staff and Proposals submitted by eligible non-profit organizations and Agencies on March 6, 2018. Funding Proposal Application received by Men & Women of Valor was the wrong application. At their meeting on March 23, 2018, the NRMF Committee gave Men & Women of Valor 30 days to re-submit their application to the NRMF Committee using the correct application and submittal requirements. On April 22, Committee staff received the correct Funding Proposal application. The Men & Women of Valor Proposal application was considered at the NRMF Committee Meeting on June 8th and selected for funding. 2 Costs to have 3rd party organization (CHDC) manage and oversee contracts with Organizations selected for funding is up to twenty (20) percent (%) of award amount after first taking out City/County Contracting cost for $3,000 for City/County to contract directly with CHDC to have CHDC administer non-profit contracts. Attachment 2 - Community Clean-up Projects Table (Strategy 10) 2020/21 Expenditure Plan Funding Allocations for Projects recommended for City/County approval by the North Richmond Mitigation Fee Committee A total of $48,811.53 is recommended to be allocated in the 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan for Community Clean-up Projects (Strategy 10). The following entities were previously selected by the Committee based on a Funding Request Proposal process conducted in 2018.1 Community Clean-up Projects Recommended for Funding in 2020/2021 Page 1 of 3 Garden Project Reporting and Invoicing Requirements Substantially equivalent language to be included in all NRMF-funded Community Project Agreements/Amendments Agreements providing for payments using funding allocated for Community Projects must include provisions that address the requirements contained herein. Contractor shall submit Progress Reports covering each invoice period, using a City/County provided template in conjunction with each monthly invoice in order to be eligible for payment. Contractor shall monitor, document, and report all Project activities associated with the tasks and deliverables described in the agreement and any eligible Project costs for which reimbursement will be requested. Upon completion of work or the end of the contract’s term, Contractor shall submit a Final Report, using a City/County provided template similar to the attached, in conjunction with the final invoice. Task Deliverables The agreement shall assign a dollar amount for each deliverable within each task. Contractor shall only be paid for completed deliverables submitted with all associated supporting documentation. The agreement may include assignment of one dollar amount to multiple deliverables for a specific task when appropriate to substantiate completion of the required task. The Contracting entity (City of County) may authorize partial payment to Contractor for submittal of incomplete deliverables if solely incomplete due to unusual and unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of the Contractor. Contractor must submit written request asking to receive payment for incomplete deliverable containing an explanation as to what factors beyond the Contractor’s control specifically precluded the Contractor from submitting the completed deliverable and why such could not have been foreseen or avoided by Contractor. Timely Submittal of Invoices A separate Reporting & Invoicing budget line item shall be included in the agreement to facilitate timely submittal of invoices, progress reports and other deliverables. Submittal of monthly invoices shall be included as a deliverable and the exact amount that is payable upon timely submittal of each invoice complete with all required supporting documentation shall be specified. The agreement shall provide that no portion of the Reporting & Invoicing budget line item be paid to Contractor for invoices submitted beyond 30 days of any monthly invoice period, or without the required documentation including completed Progress Reports. Pre-approval Required for Supplies and Materials Unless the exact supplies and materials are specified as preauthorized in the Agreement, Contractor shall obtain pre-approval from the Contracting entity (City or County) prior to incurring supplies and materials expenses for which reimbursement will be requested. To request pre-approval, contractor shall provide written request identifying all proposed supplies and materials as well as an explanation demonstrating its reasonable cost and how said items will aid in the completion of each applicable required task. Attendance of Community Meetings and Events Contractor shall attend one North Richmond Green meeting per quarter during the contract period. Documentation substantiating attendance of required meetings shall be included as a deliverable for this task and be included with all applicable monthly invoice(s). Acknowledgment Required on Outreach & Promotional Materials Attachment 3 Page 2 of 3 Any printed outreach materials or promotional items must include “Jointly funded by City of Richmond & Contra Costa County”, with the exception of T-Shirts, which Contractor may request Contracting entity pre-approve to include only the NRGreen.org website address. Authorized Advance Payments In order to receive any potential payment in advance, such must be authorized for the specified Project in Attachment 2 or Attachment 3 of the Expenditure Plan approved by both the County Board of Supervisors and Richmond City Council. No Contractor authorized for advance payment may receive more than ten (10) percent (%) of the approved Implementing Entity Award for this Project. In order to receive any advance payment(s) provided for in the City and County approved Expenditure Plan, the Contractor shall submit a written request to both the City and County Committee Staff detailing the reason(s) advance payment is necessary and itemizing each specific cost that the requested advance payment amount (not to exceed 10% of total award) would pay for and how such costs will aid in the completion of each applicable required task. Conflict of Interest Provisions Contractor shall not employ, subcontract with, or make payment to any person, for the purpose of implementing a specified Project in Attachment 2 or Attachment 3 of the Expenditure Plan that is at the same time employed by Contra Costa County, City of Richmond or any entity that receives Expenditure Plan funding from the County or the City of Richmond, except upon written approval by the Contracting entity (either City or County). Payment Provisions Contractor shall submit invoices and required deliverables on a monthly basis consistent with the amounts and frequency contained in the “Eligible Costs” Section, which together may not total more than $ (enter applicable contract amount). Contractor will only receive payment for eligible costs if such amounts are included on invoices adequately substantiated with required supporting documentation that are all submitted to the Contracting entity on or before July 30th. Invoices or portions thereof for which required supporting documentation has not been submitted by July 30th (or 30 days after any contract end date prior to June 30th) shall not be eligible for payment. 1. Invoices: Invoices shall be submitted monthly and contain the following information in sufficient detail and be submitted in a form, which adequately demonstrates consistency with the “Service Plan” specified in the contract. Invoices shall be accompanied by the applicable deliverables. a. Itemization of any tasks partially or fully completed during the applicable calendar month for which completed deliverables are submitted and associated deliverable payment amount is being requested. 2. Supporting Documentation: The following required supporting documentation must be submitted with invoices when applicable as described below. a. Every invoice must be accompanied by a Progress Report, with the exception of the final invoice, which must be accompanied by a Final Report. Both types of Reports must contain all of the information specified in the City/County provided Report templates, as well as any applicable details specified in the Service Plan as a Contractor’s Obligation. Page 3 of 3 b. All applicable required deliverables associated with the requested payment amounts itemized on each monthly invoice. City/County shall review submitted invoices and supporting documentation within a reasonable period of time and remit payment to Contractor promptly upon determining the purpose and amount of payment requested are authorized under the Agreement. G:\Conservation\Deidra\Illegal Dumping\BMPC Mitigation Fee Committee\_EPs\2020-2021 Exp Plan\Attachment 3_Clean Implementing Entity / Fiscal Sponsor (if applicable) Project Title Advance Payment Allowed (Up to 10% of Implementer Award Amount) Requested Amount Total Award Amount County Contracting Costs2 CHDC Contracting Cost (20%) to Manage Non- Profits2 Non-Profit Implementer Award Amount for Project Notes Watershed Project Curb Appeal No $ 29,986.25 $ 28,062.13 $ 1,747.34 $ 5,262.96 $ 21,051.83 Communities United Restoring Mother Earth (CURME) / Greater Richmond Interfaith Program Lots of Crops No $ 15,092.00 $ 20,117.66 $ 1,252.66 $ 3,773.00 $ 15,092.00 Total Funding Requested/Allocation Recommended $ 45,078.25 $ 48,179.79 3,000.00 9,035.96 $ 36,143.83 1 Funding Request Proposal released on February 9, 2018 by Committee Staff and Proposals submitted by eligible non-profit organizations and Agencies on March 6, 2018. Attachment 4 - Garden Projects (Strategy 13) 2020/2021 Funding Allocations for Garden Projects recommended for City/County approval by the North Richmond Mitigation Fee Committee A total allocation of $48,179.79 is recommended to be allocated in the 2020/2021 Expenditure Plan for Garden Projects.The following entities were previously selected by the Committee based on a Funding Request Proposal process conducted in 2018.1 Garden Projects Recommended for Funding in 2020/2021 2 Costs to have 3rd party organization (CHDC) manage and oversee contracts with Organizations selected for funding is up to twenty (20) percent (%) of award amount after first taking out City/County Contracting cost of $3,000 for City/County to contract directly with CHDC to have CHDC administer non-profit contracts. Hensley St Ga r r a r d Bl v d Richmond Pkwy 7th St Hensley St Duboce Ave Sanford Ave 8th St Willard Ave 9th St York St Vernon Ave Filbert St Lincoln Ave Battery St Factory StN Castro St Kelsey St 6th St Tri angl e Ct Leo St 10th St Amstan Ln Cherry St Lucas Ave Presco Ln J o y A v e Enterprise Ave Factory StCommittee Approved Additions to Primary Mitigation Funding Area Market Ave Chesley Ave Rumrill BlvdLegend July 2006 Additiion to Mitigatin Funding Area Primary Mitigation Funding Area ²0 130 260 390 52065Feet RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Contra Costa County Transportation Analysis Guidelines, consistent with the requirements of SB-743. FISCAL IMPACT: None to the General Fund. Staff time is covered under existing budgets (50% Road Fund and 50% Measure J Fund). BACKGROUND: In 2013, Governor Brown signed SB 743, which created a process to change the way transportation impacts are analyzed under California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). Automobile delay or congestion based metrics (e.g. Level of Service or “LOS”) will no longer be considered a significant impact under CEQA. During the rulemaking process the Office of Planning and Research ("OPR") recommended that jurisdictions instead use the Vehicle Miles Traveled (“VMT”) metric. In December 2018, OPR adopted a Technical Advisory containing methodologies and thresholds for VMT, but the Technical Advisory is not regulatory. Statewide implementation of SB 743 will be mandatory by July 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jamar Stamps, (925) 674-7832 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 69 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:ADOPT Contra Costa County Transportation Analysis Guidelines, consistent with the requirements of SB-743. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Local jurisdictions will be allowed to retain their congestion-based standards (i.e. LOS) for project planning purposes. Developers may therefore be required to use the two metrics in their traffic analyses. Consistent with state/local (e.g. Contra Costa Transportation Authority) guidance and industry best practices, staff proposes updated procedures for using congestion-based standards for operational analysis. County Transportation Analysis Guidelines Government Code Section 15022 (Guidelines for California Environmental Quality Act) states “Each public agency shall adopt objectives, criteria, and specific procedures consistent with CEQA and these Guidelines for administering its responsibilities under CEQA, including the orderly evaluation of projects and preparation of environmental documents.” County staff developed transportation analysis guidelines that will implement SB 743 and VMT metrics for evaluating transportation impacts of proposed projects under CEQA in the unincorporated area. The intent of these guidelines is to aid in the preparation of traffic analysis for project applicants and staff, as well as establish a uniform approach, methodology, and tool set to evaluate the impacts of land use decisions and related transportation projects on the County transportation system. This will be a “living document” and updates will be brought to the Board periodically to reflect newly acquired data, emerging best practices, and relevant policies. The County Transportation Analysis Guidelines provide technical guidance regarding assessment of VMT, thresholds of significance, and mitigation measures for land development and transportation projects in the unincorporated area. These guidelines were developed by a working group consisting of staff from DCD, Public Works, and consultant Fehr & Peers. The County VMT guidance is consistent with OPR’s Technical Advisory (December 2018). CCTA is also in the process of developing VMT policies. A preliminary review of CCTA's draft SB 743 policies revealed they are generally consistent with the County's proposed policies. County staff is recommending the Board adopt the proposed County guidelines.County staff participates in CCTA’s task force for developing their policies, which will help ensure consistency between the County’s and CCTA’s policies. Staff has been coordinating with the Contra Costa Transportation Authority as that agency develops guidance for its members on adapting to the requirements of SB743. Staff will evaluate the outcome of that process and consider whether any updates to the recommended guidelines or other county policies are appropriate to recommend to the Board. The full guidelines document is provided as Exhibit B. As permitted by SB 743, the County will continue to use LOS, outside of future CEQA reviews, as a tool to evaluate the operations of transportation infrastructure (e.g. signalized intersections). The County’s new General Plan will reference the County’s transportation guidelines which will contain VMT and LOS standards. The County will continue to require developer fees as a condition of approval for projects that result in operational deficiencies on the transportation system (Government Code Section 66001(a)). May 13, 2020 County Planning Commission ("CPC") County staff presented an overview of SB 743 to the CPC on May 13, 2020 followed by questions and discussion. Staff also indicated how the County could implement SB 743 and what that process has included to date. The full CPC staff report is provided in Exhibit A. A summary of the major discussion points from the CPC included: Will SB 743 force projects to pay twice (i.e. “double dip”) to mitigate transportation impacts (i.e. for LOS and VMT)? Staff Response: Traffic impact analyses already use a number of different policies and metrics to disclose the impacts of a project. These include safety, complete streets compliance, and LOS. VMT is now being included in that menu of policies. So long as these metrics and policies are applied appropriately, it will not be “double dipping." Due to the dynamic between LOS and VMT, (e.g. LOS mitigation can sometimes increase VMT), LOS analysis and mitigation will necessarily be applied more strategically. Furthermore, most VMT mitigation would likely involve some form of transportation demand management (“TDM”). TDM measures are generally more cost effective to implement than traditional traffic mitigations (e.g. widening roads, building traffic signals, etc.). The County adopted a TDM ordinance in the early 2000s that requires residential and non-residential projects of a certain size comply with the TDM Ordinance. What changes now is that projects may need to implement TDM measures to reduce VMT to satisfy CEQA. What happens if SB 743 is not implemented locally by July 1, 2020? SB 743 will take effect statewide by July 1, 2020, which means delay-based metrics (i.e. LOS) will no longer be considered an impact under CEQA. CEQA Section 15064.7 encourages lead agencies to develop and publish thresholds of significance. However, in the absence of formally adopted SB 743 related metrics and thresholds of significance, lead agencies may use thresholds of significance adopted or recommended by other agencies or experts. In the case of SB 743 it is likely that agencies may simply rely on the Technical Advisory provided by the State Office of Planning Research. Does this make it easier for high-density projects in general? Is this moving development too fast? Not necessarily. Part of the intent of SB 743 is to provide criteria for evaluating transportation impacts that also promotes the “reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses" (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3). To that end, certain projects, both residential and non-residential, that possess these characteristics and are located in low VMT areas generally would be presumed to have a less than significant impact under CEQA, whereas before SB 743 that might not be the case. All projects will still be evaluated based on the full complement of CEQA checklist items. How does travel demand change with Covid-19? Commute travel in the Bay Area declined significantly since the March 2020 shelter-in-place order. Unfortunately, it is difficult to predict when commute behavior will resume to “normal” or what, if any, long-lasting effects this will have on future travel behavior. County staff will continue to monitor the situation and utilize guidance on travel forecasting methods and transportation analysis from various regional, state and federal agencies to make sure best practices are applied. Can transit stops be other than BART (e.g. bus)? Yes. Per Public Resources Code Section 21064.3, “’major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.” Currently, bus routes that meet that frequency threshold include: Service Route AC Transit (Contra Costa) None County Connection Route 7 – Shadelands/Pleasant Hill BART Route 10 – Concord BART/Clayton Route 20 – Concord BART/ Diablo Valley College Route 35 – Dublin BART/San Ramon Tri Delta Transit None WestCat None Can a project be exempt if the site is only partially within ½ mile of transit stop? There is no explicit guidance on this. However, staff’s interpretation of the Public Resources Code would indicate that certain projects on sites partially within ½ mile of a major transit stop would be considered to have a less than significant impact. Covid-19 will have massive long lingering impacts on workforce behavior. Telecommuting may become the "new normal." How quickly can modeling respond to that so that we’re using latest and greatest data? Generally, local jurisdictions in Contra Costa rely on the Countywide Travel Demand Model (maintained by Contra Costa Transportation Authority or “CCTA”) to generate travel forecasts for proposed projects. Adjustments to the model occur as-needed, but for major shifts in travel behavior that result from large-scale events (like a global pandemic), and that may have perpetual effects are difficult to account for due to their anomalous and unprecedented nature. It is not clear yet on how the travel demand model will be effected by Covid-19, but County staff participates on CCTA’s Technical Model Working Group, contributes to decennial model update and can report back to the CPC on any future updates to the model. The CPC also provided comments advising staff to account for the implications of such policies on future land use decisions, and to be cautious of over burdensome fee programs that may stifle development (this was provided with the thought that new types of mitigation measures may necessitate new developer fee programs). The CPC also suggested there be a follow up discussion on the subject to better understand how these polices are developed and eventually applied. Staff will organize a follow-up informational item to the CPC after the County’s guidelines are adopted. Conclusion Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors adopt Contra Costa County Transportation Analysis Guidelines, consistent with the requirements of SB-743. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County will not implement SB 743 by the statewide mandatory implementation deadline. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - 5/13/20 County Planning Commission Staff Report Attachment B - DRAFT County Transportation Analysis Guidelines Department of Conservation and Development County Planning Commission Wednesday, May 13, 2020 – 6:30 P.M.  STAFF REPORT Agenda Item #_____      Project Title:      Senate Bill (“SB”) 743 (Steinberg, 2013) Implementation     County File(s):    n/a  Applicant/Owner:    Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and  Development (Applicant & Owner)    General Plan:    Zoning:  Countywide     n/a     Site Address/Location:    Countywide     California Environmental  Quality Act (CEQA) Status:    Exempt under CEQA Section 15061(b)(3): The activity is covered by  the common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects  which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the  environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no  possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect  on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA    Project Planner: Jamar Stamps, AICP, Senior Planner, (925) 674‐7832    Staff Recommendation: Approve (See Section II for Complete Recommendation)      I. PROJECT SUMMARY    County staff will present an overview of Senate Bill (“SB”) 743 (Steinberg), including Vehicle  Miles Traveled (“VMT”) as the metric for evaluating transportation impacts of proposed  projects under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”).     II. RECOMMENDATION    ACCEPT report on Senate Bill (“SB”) 743 (Steinberg, 2013) regarding VMT as the metric for  evaluating transportation impacts of proposed projects under CEQA.     IV. PROJECT DESCRIPTION  CPC – May 13, 2020 SB 743 Implementation Page 2 of 7   County staff will present an overview of SB 743, the updated CEQA Guidelines for evaluating  transportation impacts. Per SB 743, delay‐based metrics (e.g. Level of Service or “LOS”) are  no longer considered significant impacts under CEQA. The Governor’s Office of Planning  Research (“OPR”) recommends using VMT for evaluating transportation impacts. VMT is  calculated as the total amount (miles) of vehicular travel.     III. BACKGROUND    In 2013, Governor Brown signed SB 743, which created a process to change the way  transportation impacts are analyzed under CEQA. Automobile delay metrics (e.g. Level of  Service or “LOS”) will no longer be considered a significant impact under CEQA and OPR  recommends that jurisdictions instead use the VMT metric. December 2018, OPR adopted  a Technical Advisory containing methodologies and thresholds for VMT, but the Technical  Advisory is not regulatory. Statewide implementation of SB 743 will be mandatory by July  2020.    OPR will allow jurisdictions to retain their congestion‐based standards (i.e. LOS) for project  planning purposes. Developers may therefore be required to perform two different traffic  analyses. Consistent with State/local (Contra Costa Transportation Authority) guidance and  industry best practices, staff will propose updated procedures for using congestion‐based  standards for operational analysis.     VMT and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction1    Senate Bill 32 (Pavley, 2016) requires California to reduce greenhouse gas (“GHG”)  emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and Executive Order B16‐12 provides a  target of 80 percent below 1990 emissions levels for the transportation sector by 2050. The  transportation sector has three major means of reducing GHG emissions: increasing vehicle  efficiency, reducing fuel carbon content, and reducing the amount of vehicle travel.     The California Air Resources Board (“CARB”) has provided a path forward for achieving  these emissions reductions from the transportation sector in its 2016 Mobile Source  Strategy. CARB determined that it will not be possible to achieve the State’s 2030 and post‐ 2030 emissions goals without reducing VMT growth. Further, in its 2018 Progress Report  on California’s Sustainable Communities and Climate Protection Act, CARB found that  despite the State meeting its 2020 climate goals, “emissions from statewide passenger  vehicle travel per capita [have been] increasing and going in the wrong direction,” and  “California cannot meet its [long‐term] climate goals without curbing growth in single‐ occupancy vehicle activity.” CARB also found that “with emissions from the transportation  1 State of California Office of Planning and Research, Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018) CPC – May 13, 2020 SB 743 Implementation Page 3 of 7 sector continuing to rise despite increases in fuel efficiency and decreases in the carbon  content of fuel, California will not achieve the necessary greenhouse gas emissions  reductions to meet mandates for 2030 and beyond without significant changes to how  communities and transportation systems are planned, funded, and built.”     To achieve the State’s long‐term climate goals, California needs to reduce per capita VMT,  which would occur under CEQA through VMT mitigation. Half of California’s GHG emissions  come from the transportation sector, therefore, reducing VMT is an effective climate  strategy, which can also result in co‐benefits2. According to CARB, without early VMT  mitigation, the state may follow a path that meets GHG targets in the early years, but finds  itself poorly positioned to meet more stringent targets later. For example, in absence of  VMT analysis and mitigation in CEQA, lead agencies might rely upon verifiable offsets for  GHG mitigation, ignoring the longer‐term climate change impacts resulting from land use  development and infrastructure investment decisions. As stated in CARB’s 2017 Scoping  Plan: “California’s future climate strategy will require increased focus on integrated land use  planning to support livable, transit‐connected communities, and conservation of  agricultural and other lands. Accommodating population and economic growth through  travel‐ and energy‐efficient land use provides GHG‐efficient growth, reducing GHGs from  both transportation and building energy use. GHGs can be further reduced at the project  level through implementing energy efficient construction and travel demand management  approaches.”    In light of this, the 2017 Scoping Plan describes and quantifies VMT reductions needed to  achieve our long‐term GHG emissions reduction goals, and specifically points to the need  for statewide deployment of the VMT metric in CEQA: “Employing VMT as the metric of  transportation impact statewide will help to ensure GHG reductions planned under SB 375  will be achieved through on‐the‐ground development, and will also play an important role  in creating the additional GHG reductions needed beyond SB 375 across the State.  Implementation of this change will rely, in part, on local land use decisions to reduce GHG  emissions associated with the transportation sector, both at the project level, and in long‐ term plans (including general plans, climate action plans, specific plans, and transportation  plans) and supporting sustainable community strategies developed under SB 375.”     V. DISCUSSION    VMT is a measure of the total amount of (miles) vehicular travel. For example, one vehicle  traveling ten miles would equal 10 VMT. Four vehicles traveling ten miles would equal 40  VMT. Typically, development located at greater distance from other land uses or in areas  2 Fang et al. (2017) Cutting Greenhouse Gas Emissions Is Only the Beginning: A Literature Review of the Co- Benefits of Reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled. “…reductions in VMT produce many other potential benefits… reductions in other air pollutant emissions, water pollution, wildlife mortality, and traffic congestion, as well as improvements in safety and health, and savings in public and private costs.” CPC – May 13, 2020 SB 743 Implementation Page 4 of 7 with few transportation options generates more vehicle trips and trips of greater length  (and therefore more VMT) than development located in close proximity to other uses or in  areas with many transportation choices.    OPR’s Technical Advisory contains recommendations regarding assessment of VMT,  thresholds of significance, and mitigation measures as a resource for the public to use at  their discretion. OPR indicates their guidance is only advisory, not mandatory. County staff  has relied on this guidance, as well as information from various other sources (e.g. Fehr &  Peers (transportation planning and engineering firm), Contra Costa Transportation  Authority, other local agencies, articles and published research, etc.) to develop  recommendations for VMT assessment, thresholds of significance, and mitigation measures  for the unincorporated County.     Department of Conservation and Development (“DCD”) and Public Works Department  (“PWD”) staff along with County Counsel and Fehr & Peers formed an interdepartmental  working group (“working group”) for SB 743 implementation. The working group meets bi‐ weekly to discuss development of policies, methodology, procedures and implementation  of VMT. The working group was also tasked with determining how the County will continue  to use LOS as an evaluation tool for certain transportation facility operations.      Statewide Implementation Efforts    Despite SB 743 being a new paradigm shift in transportation planning and most agencies in  the midst of the implementation process, a few public agencies across the state have  already implemented SB 743 policies. Most of these agencies consist of larger metropolitan  cities (e.g. San Francisco, Oakland, Los Angeles, etc.) with transportation infrastructure and  land use contexts that generally fit the spirit of SB 743. San Bernardino County is the only  known unincorporated jurisdiction thus far that has fully implemented SB 743.  Attachment  A includes a summary of early adopter agencies.     County General Plan    The County is undergoing a comprehensive update to the General Plan. The Growth  Management Element and Transportation/Circulation Element both contain congestion  and delay related policies for transportation evaluation, such as CEQA impact significance  criteria. SB 743 implementation will include updates to these policies.     The Table 1 shows a summary of existing General Plan policies from the Growth  Management and Transportation/Circulation elements referencing LOS in the context of  CEQA that may be amended or deleted prior to adoption of the new General Plan:      CPC – May 13, 2020 SB 743 Implementation Page 5 of 7 TABLE 1   Existing General Plan Language Action Growth Management Element 4‐3. Table 4‐1 shows the performance standards  which shall apply to development projects. In the  event that a signalized intersection on a Basic Route  exceeds the applicable level of service standard, the  County may approve projects if the County can  establish appropriate mitigation measures…  SB 743 no longer considers  LOS impacts under CEQA,  however County will retain  LOS as an operational  standard only.   4‐5. For the purpose of applying the Traffic Level of  Service standards consistent with Measure C‐1988  only, unincorporated areas subject to the growth  management standards of this Element shall be  characterized as Central Business District, Urban,  Suburban, Semi‐rural and Rural as depicted in  Figure 4‐2.  Language will be consistent  with Measure J.   4‐d. Require that during the review of development  proposals, the traffic impact analysis shall  determine whether a project could cause a  signalized intersection or freeway ramp to exceed  the applicable standard and shall identify  mitigations/fees such that the intersection or ramp  will operate in conformance with applicable  standards. Development proposals shall be required  to comply with conditions of approval detailing  identified mitigation measures and/or fees. In no  event shall Local Road Improvement and  Maintenance Funds replace development mitigation  fee requirements, pursuant to Measure C‐1988.  SB 743 no longer considers  LOS impacts under CEQA.   4‐e. Establish through application to the Contra  Costa Transportation Authority, and in conjunction  with the regional committees, a list of Routes of  Regional Significance and Intersections proposed for  Findings of Special Circumstances. Proposed  projects affecting these routes and/or intersections  will require alternate mitigation as specified in  Action Plans to be adopted by the Transportation  Authority, but in this respect only, shall not be  subject to LOS Performance Standards.  SB 743 no longer considers  LOS impacts under CEQA.  4‐f. In the event that any Basic Route does not meet  adopted standards the County shall consider  SB 743 no longer considers  LOS impacts under CEQA.  CPC – May 13, 2020 SB 743 Implementation Page 6 of 7 amendments to either its General Plan Land Use  Element, Zoning, Capital Improvement program or  other relevant plans or policies in order to attain  the standards. If this is not feasible for the reasons  specified in the Transportation Authority's  "Implementation Guide: Traffic Level of Service  Standards and Programs for Routes of Regional  Significance" application for findings of special  circumstances shall be made to the Transportation  Authority. Such application shall include alternative  proposed standards and mitigation measures. Transportation and Circulation 5‐E. To permit development only in locations of the  County where appropriate traffic level of service  standards are ensured.  County will retain LOS as an  operational standard only  and should not be the sole  basis for denying a project.   5‐1. Cooperation between the cities and the County  shall be strongly encouraged when defining level of  service standards.  County will retain LOS as an  operational standard only.    County Transportation Analysis Guidelines    Government Code Section 65102 (California Planning and Zoning Laws) states “a legislative  body may establish for its planning agency any rules, procedures, or standards which do not  conflict with state or federal laws.” The working group is developing transportation analysis  guidelines that will implement SB 743 and VMT metrics for evaluating transportation  impacts of proposed projects under CEQA in the unincorporated area. The intent of these  guidelines is to aid in the preparation of traffic analysis for project applicants and staff, as  well as establish a uniform approach, methodology, and tool set to evaluate the impacts of  land use decisions and related transportation projects on the County transportation  system. This will be a “living document” and updated periodically to reflect newly acquired  data and relevant policies.    The County will continue to maintain LOS as a tool to evaluate the operations of  transportation infrastructure (e.g. signalized intersections) in concert with new VMT  policies for CEQA review. The County’s new General Plan will reference the County’s  transportation guidelines for VMT and LOS standards. Developer fees will continue to be  required as a condition of project approval if a proposed project results in operational  deficiencies on the transportation system3.   3 Government Code Section 66001(a), when imposing a fee as a condition of approval of a development project, the local agency shall identify the use/purpose of the fee. That identification may, but need not, be made by reference to CPC – May 13, 2020 SB 743 Implementation Page 7 of 7   Given statewide implementation of SB 743 will be mandatory by July 2020, final adoption  of the County’s new transportation CEQA policies and standards will precede adoption of  the updated General Plan.     VI. CONCLUSION    SB 743 has fundamentally changed the way local agencies evaluate transportation impacts  under CEQA. County staff will develop proposed policies and procedures for  implementation of SB 743 in the unincorporated area. The County is also undergoing a  comprehensive General Plan update that will reflect these changes. However, the County’s  proposed SB 743 implementation will be executed prior to completion of the County’s  comprehensive General Plan update in order to meet the July 2020 mandatory statewide  implementation deadline.     Attachments:    A. Early Adopters Chart  B. Presentation     a capital improvement program, general or specific plan requirements, or may be made in other public documents that identify public facilities for which the fee is charged. Attachment A Courtesy of Fehr & Peers (2020) Jurisdiction Threshold LOS Maintained? CEQA for Implementation City/County of San Francisco Residential: 15% below regional VMT per capita Office: 15% below regional VMT per employee Retail: 15% below regional VMT per retail employee Mixed-Use: Evaluate each land use independently No City of Oakland Residential: 15% below regional VMT per capita Office: 15% below regional VMT per employee Retail: 15% below regional VMT per retail employee Yes Not a “project” under CEQA* City of Elk Grove All Land Use Types: 15% below city’s 2015 baseline VMT of similar land uses Yes City of Los Angeles Project VMT should be no higher than the existing average VMT in the relevant Planning Area. Existing VMT ranges from 6.0 to 9.4 VMT per capita, and from 7.6 to 15.0 VMT per employee, depending on the Planning Area. Yes Not a “project” under CEQA* City of San Jose Residential: More stringent of: 1) 15% below citywide VMT per resident or 2) 15% below regional VMT per resident General Employment: 15% below existing regional VMT per employee Industrial Employment Uses: No higher than existing regional VMT per employee Retail Uses: Net increase in the total regional VMT Mixed-Use: Each land use component to be analyzed independently Yes City of Woodland 10% reduction in VMT per capita or VMT per service population compared to the General Plan 2035 VMT performance, or a 10% reduction compared to similar land uses Yes CSU System (23 campuses) 15% below regionwide average VMT Yes San Bernardino County 4% below existing average VMT per service population in unincorporated county (based on maximum achievable TDM reduction) Yes West Riverside Council of Governments Projects located within a transit priority area (TPA) may be presumed to have a less-than-significant VMT impact. Projects located within a low VMT generating traffic analysis zone (TAZ) may be presumed to have a less than significant VMT impact. Yes *Both the City of Oakland (2016) and Los Angeles (2018) invoke CEQA section 21080(b)(1) indicating the action is not a proposed project as defined by CEQA, and section 15061(b)(3) stating the action is covered by the common sense exemption that CEQA only applies to projects. Attachment B CONTRA COSTA COUNTYSENATE BILL 743IMPLEMENTATIONContra Costa County Planning CommissionConservation and Development, Public Works DepartmentsWednesday, May 13, 2020 AGENDA•What is Senate Bill (“SB”) 743?•What is Vehicle Miles Traveled (“VMT”)?•Statewide Implementation Efforts •Contra Costa County Implementation•Sample Project Evaluations •Schedule/Next Steps•Questions/Discussion2 SENATE BILL (“SB”) 743LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND3Assembly Bill (“AB”) 32 (Nunez, 2006)Senate Bill (“SB”) 375 (Steinberg, 2008)SB 743 (Steinberg, 2013)SB 32 (Pavley, 2016)Mandatory Statewide (July 1, 2020) WHAT IS SENATE BILL (“SB”) 743?•Governor Brown signed Senate Bill (SB) 743 (Steinberg, 2013).•CEQA Guidelines amend to provide an alternative to LOS for evaluating transportation impacts. •“promote the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the development of multimodal transportation networks, and a diversity of land uses.”•Auto delay will no longer be considered a significant impact under CEQA. •SB 743 also amended congestion management law to allow cities and counties to opt out of LOS standards within certain infill areas.•Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) identified vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”) as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project’s transportation impacts.4 5 6 7 STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION EFFORTS•OPR Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts (2018)•Assessment of VMT, thresholds of significance, and mitigation measures. •Resource for public to use at their discretion. •Recommendations are advisory, not required. •Bay Area Metro: Key SB 743 Implementation Steps for Land Use Projects•Contra Costa Transportation Authority (“CCTA”) •Growth Management Task Force 8 STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION EFFORTS•OPR Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts (2018)•Thresholds of Significance:•OPR recommends that a per capita or per employee VMT that is 15 percent below that of existing development may be a reasonable threshold.•Why 15 percent? •Various legislative mandates and state policies establish quantitative greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. •Consistent with SB 743’s direction to OPR to select a threshold that will help the State achieve its climate goals. 9 STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION EFFORTS•City/County of San Francisco•City of Oakland•City of Elk Grove•City of Los Angeles•City of San Jose•City of Woodland•CSU System (23 campuses)•San Bernardino County•West Riverside Council of Governments•City of Concord (in progress) 10 IMPLEMENTATION FOR THE UNINCORPORATED COUNTY•County General Plan Update•Transportation/Circulation Element•Growth Management Element•County Climate Action Plan (“CAP”)•Consistency with CAP Goals•Land Development Review•Transportation Analysis Guidelines 11 12 PROJECT EVALUATION•CEQA evaluation for land development projects:•Presumption of less than significant impact within ½ mile of transit stations•15% below VMT per capita (regional or jurisdiction)•A proposed project exceeding a level of 15% below existing VMT per capita may indicate a significant transportation impact13 EXAMPLE 1: TRANSIT STATION AREA (SCREENING)•Avalon Walnut Creek at Contra Costa Centre (Contra Costa Centre) •200+ Multi-Family Residential/Mixed-Use•Within ½ mile of Contra Costa Centre/Pleasant Hill BART Station•Less-than-significant VMT impacts 14½ Mile EXAMPLE 2: RESIDENTIAL PROJECT•Bay Point Family Apartments (Bay Point)•195-unit Multi-Family Residential•21.4 average VMT per capita (Traffic Analysis Zone)•27.7 VMT = 15% below RTPC (unincorporated area ) VMT per capita (32.6 VMT)•Less-than-significant VMT impacts 15 EXAMPLE 3: NON-RESIDENTIAL PROJECT•500 Pittsburg Ave. Warehouse (North Richmond)•493,000 square-foot Warehouse/Distribution Center •19.7 average VMT per worker (Traffic Analysis Zone)•14.8 VMT = 15% below RTPC (unincorporated area ) VMT per capita (17.4 VMT)•Significant VMT impacts 16 NEXT STEPS/SCHEDULE17 THANK YOUQuestions/Discussion18 Conservation and Development Department Public Works Department 6/23/2020 Contra Costa County Transportation Analysis Guidelines Page | 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Transportation Policy Framework ......................................................................................................................... 3 A. Senate Bill 743 – California Environmental Quality Act .................................................................................... 3 B. County General Plan ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Growth Management Element .................................................................................................................... 3 2. Transportation and Circulation Element ...................................................................................................... 4 C. Capital Road Improvement & Preservation Program ....................................................................................... 5 D. Complete Streets .............................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Contra Costa County Complete Streets Principles ....................................................................................... 5 2. Contra Costa County Complete Streets Implementation Measures ............................................................ 6 3. Exceptions .................................................................................................................................................... 7 D. Vision Zero Contra Costa County ...................................................................................................................... 7 E. County Ordinance Code .................................................................................................................................... 8 1. Section 74-4.006 – Electric Vehicle (“EV”) Charging .................................................................................... 8 2. Chapter 82-16 – Off-Street Parking .............................................................................................................. 8 3. Chapter 82-32 – Transportation Demand Management ............................................................................. 9 4. Title 9 - SUBDIVISIONS ................................................................................................................................. 9 F. Contra Costa Transportation Authority ............................................................................................................ 9 1. CCTA Technical Procedures ........................................................................................................................ 10 2. CCTA Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan .......................................................................................... 10 3. CCTA Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance .............................................................................. 10 3. Staff Protocol for Evaluating Land Development Proposals ................................................................................ 10 4. Transportation Analysis Guidelines ..................................................................................................................... 13 A. Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 13 1. VMT Screening Criteria .............................................................................................................................. 13 2. VMT Metrics ............................................................................................................................................... 14 3. VMT Forecasting ........................................................................................................................................ 15 4. VMT Thresholds ......................................................................................................................................... 15 5. VMT Mitigation .......................................................................................................................................... 16 6. Transportation Projects.............................................................................................................................. 17 B. Level of Service Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 17 1. Level of Service Analysis Scope and Operational Standards ...................................................................... 18 2. Trip Generation Estimates ......................................................................................................................... 19 Page | 2 3. Adjustments to Trip Generation Rates ....................................................................................................... 19 4. Trip Distribution and Assignment .............................................................................................................. 20 5. Selection of Study Intersections ................................................................................................................. 20 6. Traffic Counting Protocol ........................................................................................................................... 20 7. Analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 21 8. Operational Improvements ........................................................................................................................ 22 5. Appendices .......................................................................................................................................................... 23 A. Electric Vehicle Charging Chart....................................................................................................................... 24 B. TDM Strategies ............................................................................................................................................... 25 C. California Environmental Quality Act Checklist (Transportation) ................................................................... 26 Page | 3 1. INTRODUCTION The Contra Costa County Transportation Analysis Guidelines (“TAG” or “Guidelines”) are provided to aid in the preparation of traffic analysis for project applicants and staff. The purpose of this document is to establish a uniform approach, methodology, and tool set to evaluate the impacts of land use decisions and related transportation projects on the County transportation system. This is a “living document” and will be updated periodically to reflect newly acquired data and relevant policies. 2. TRANSPORTATION POLICY FRAMEWORK A. SENATE BI LL 743 – CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT In 2013, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill (“SB”) 743 (Steinberg), which created a process to change the way that transportation impacts are analyzed under California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”). Specifically, SB 743 amended the CEQA guidelines to state that automobile delay metrics (i.e. level of service or “LOS”) will no longer be considered a significant impact under CEQA. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) and the California Natural Resources Agency has certified and adopted changes to the CEQA Guidelines that identify Vehicle Miles Traveled (“VMT”) as the most appropriate metric to evaluate a project’s transportation impacts. In 2018, OPR released a “Technical Advisory” containing methodologies and thresholds for VMT, but the Technical Advisory is not regulatory, only advisory. The OPR Technical Advisory allows local agencies to retain their congestion-based standards (i.e. LOS) in general plans and for project planning purposes. Projects may therefore be required to provide two different traffic analyses. In 2020, the California Department of Transportation’s (“Caltrans”) released their Transportation Impact Study Guide (“TISG”) intended for use by local agencies as a guide to assist in the Local Development- Intergovernmental Review (“LD-IGR”) program during environmental review of land use projects and plans. The LD-IGR program works with local jurisdictions early and throughout their land use planning and decision making processes – consistent with the requirements of CEQA and state planning law – to reduce single occupancy vehicle trips, provide a safe transportation system, reduce per capita VMT, increase accessibility to destinations via cycling, walking, carpooling, and transit, and reduce Greenhouse Gas (“GHG”) emissions. B. COUNTY GENERAL PLAN The purpose of the Contra Costa County General Plan is to express the broad goals and policies, and specific implementation measures, which will guide decisions on future growth, development, and the conservation of resources. The goals, policies and implementation programs contained in the General Plan represent the hopes and concerns of the residents of the County in terms of defining and preserving a "quality of life." The various elements or chapters of the plan are intended to provide objectives, principles and standards to decision-making bodies in the County, as well as numerous other public agencies, that will be making decisions about the development of private and public lands and the locations and extent of improvements such as transportation infrastructure. 1. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT In 1988, the voters approved Measure C which established the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (“CCTA” or “Authority), added one-half cent to the county sales tax for the next 20 years to be used for transportation funding, and gave the Authority the charge to implement a Growth Management Program (“GMP”). That program requires the County and each city to develop a Growth Management Element (“GME”) as part of its General Plan in order to be eligible to receive local street maintenance and improvement funds generated by Measure C-1988. Page | 4 Contra Costa voters extended the Measure C-1988 transportation sales tax and GMP through 2034 when they approved Measure J in 2004. Measure J also maintained the requirement that each jurisdiction participating in the GMP to adopt a GME as part of its General Plan. The adopted GME must: • Outline the jurisdiction’s goals and policies for managing growth, and • Show how the jurisdiction will comply with Measure J’s requirements for a Growth Management Program. The Growth Management Program in Measure J focuses on four key objectives: • Assure that new residential, business and commercial growth pays for the facilities required to meet the demands resulting from that growth. • Require cooperative transportation and land use planning among Contra Costa County, cities, towns, and transportation agencies. • Support land use patterns within Contra Costa that make more efficient use of the transportation system, consistent with the General Plans of local jurisdictions. • Support infill and redevelopment in existing urban and brownfield areas. The County’s GME establishes policies and performance standards for various public facilities (e.g. fire, police, parks, sanitary facilities, water, and flood control) and the transportation system to generally ensure that said facilities are provided consistent with adopted standards. The intent is to ensure that growth takes place in a manner that will ensure protection of the health, safety and welfare of both existing and future residents of Contra Costa County. Responsible management of growth in the county is key to preserving the quality of life for current and future county residents. 2. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION ELEMENT The County’s Transportation and Circulation Element (“TCE”) establishes transportation goals, policies, and specific implementation measures to assure that the transportation system of the County will have adequate capacity to efficiently serve planned growth in Contra Costa County. The intention of the TCE is to provide a plan and implementing measures for an integrated, multi-modal transportation system that will safely and efficiently meet the transportation needs of all economic and social segments of the County and provide for the transport of goods and services throughout Contra Costa County. The transportation system outlined in the TCE recognizes on the one hand the limited availability of transportation funding and, on the other hand, the growing need for improved accessibility to the activities important to our quality of life. As a result, the TCE emphasizes the efficient use of the existing transportation system and cost effective enhancements to this system to accommodate planned growth consistent with the Land Use Element. The County will continue to seek revenue from a variety of sources for needed transportation improvements and to work toward the establishment of new and creative funding mechanisms (i.e., private/public and regional partnerships) consistent with the goals and policies of the Growth Management Element, Measure C – 1988 and Measure J – 2004. The County will also seek improved land use patterns in Contra Costa that reduce the need to travel long distances to meet our daily needs through implementation of policies like Complete Streets and SB 743. Page | 5 C. CAPITAL ROAD IMPROVEMENT & PRESERVATION PROGRAM The Capital Road Improvement & Preservation Program (“CRIPP”) is a programming document for the funding of capital road improvement projects within Contra Costa County. It includes estimated project costs, funding source information, and scheduling information for known potential projects within the next seven fiscal years. It also includes revenue projections and a summary of estimated project-related expenditures for each funding source. The CRIPP was established by Resolution 89/306 under the County Road Improvement Policy. The Policy was authorized by Government Code Section 66002 and is required under the Growth Management Element of the Contra Costa Transportation and Growth Management Program Ordinance approved by the voters in Measure C-1988. Approval of the CRIPP by the Board of Supervisors does not automatically approve each individual project listed in the CRIPP. Each project in the CRIPP is subject to a separate public review, engineering feasibility analysis, and environmental assessment before the Board of Supervisors will consider final approval of the project. The project costs in the CRIPP are for the current year. The CRIPP does not escalate the project costs for future inflation. A large portion of the funding programmed in the CRIPP is from fees associated with the Area of Benefit (“AOB”) Fee. AOB Fee Programs are adjusted annually to provide for inflation. LINK: County Capital Road Improvement & Preservation Program D. COMPLETE STREETS “A complete street is a transportation facility that is planned, designed, operated, and maintained to provide safe mobility for all users, including bicyclists, pedestrians, transit vehicles, truckers, and motorists, appropriate to the function and context of the facility. Every complete street looks different, according to its context, community preferences, the types of road users, and their needs.” -Caltrans Complete Streets Program In 2006, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (“MTC”) adopted a resolution to accommodate travelers who walk and bike as part of project planning and design work. MTC developed a “Complete Streets Checklist” that must be completed in order for project sponsors to be eligible to receive state or federal funding for transportation projects. On September 30, 2008, the Governor of California signed Assembly Bill No. 1358, which required, commencing January 1, 2011, that each city or county substantially revise their general plan circulation elements to provide policies to plan for balanced, multimodal transportation networks that meet the needs of all users. On July 12, 2016, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2016/374 approving the Complete Streets Policy of Contra Costa County. This Policy expanded on a 2008 General Plan amendment to support Complete Streets policies. 1. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMPLETE STREETS PRINCIPLES a. Complete Streets Serving All Users. Contra Costa County expresses its commitment to creating and maintaining Complete Streets that provide safe, comfortable, and convenient travel along and across rights-of-way (including streets, roads, highways, bridges, paths, and other portions of the transportation system) through a comprehensive, integrated transportation network that Page | 6 serves all categories of users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, persons with disabilities, motorists, movers of commercial goods, users and operators of public transportation, seniors, children, youth, students and families. b. Context Sensitivity. In planning and implementing street projects, departments and agencies of Contra Costa County shall maintain sensitivity to local conditions in both residential and business districts as well as urban, suburban, and rural areas, and shall work with residents, merchants, school representatives, and other stakeholders to ensure that a strong sense of place ensues. Improvements that will be considered include sidewalks, shared use paths, separated bikeways/cycle tracks, bicycle lanes, bicycle routes, paved shoulders, street trees and landscaping, planting strips, accessible curb ramps, crosswalks, refuge islands, pedestrian signals, signs, street furniture, bicycle parking facilities, public transportation stops and facilities, transit priority signalization, traffic calming circles, transit bulb outs, road diets and other features assisting in the provision of safe travel for all users and those features and concepts identified in the Contra Costa County Complete Streets General Plan Amendment of April 2008. c. Complete Streets Routinely Addressed by All Departments. All departments and agencies of Contra Costa County shall work towards making Complete Streets practices a routine part of everyday operations, approach every relevant project, program, and practice as an opportunity to improve streets and the transportation network for all categories of users/modes, and work in coordination with other departments, agencies, and jurisdictions to maximize opportunities for Complete Streets, connectivity, and cooperation. Example activities include, but are not necessarily limited to the following: pavement resurfacing, restriping, accessing above and underground utilities, signalization operations or modifications, maintenance of landscaping/related features, and shall exclude minor (catch basin cleaning, sign replacement, pothole repair, etc.) maintenance and emergency repairs. d. All Projects and Phases. Complete Streets infrastructure sufficient to enable reasonably safe travel along and across the right of way for each category of users shall be incorporated into all planning, funding, design, approval, and implementation processes for any construction, reconstruction, retrofit, maintenance, operations, alteration, or repair of streets (including streets, roads, highways, bridges, and other portions of the transportation system), except that specific infrastructure for a given category of users may be excluded if an exemption is approved via the process set forth in section C.1 of this policy. 2. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES a. Plan Consultation and Consistency. Maintenance, planning, and design of projects affecting the transportation system shall be consistent with the Contra Costa County General Plan, as well as other applicable bicycle, pedestrian, transit, multimodal, best practices, and other relevant documents. Where such consistency cannot be achieved without negative consequences, consistency shall not be required if the head of the relevant departments, or designees, provides written approval explaining the basis of such deviation. b. Street Network/Connectivity. As feasible, and as opportunities arise, Contra Costa County shall incorporate Complete Streets infrastructure into existing streets to improve the safety and Page | 7 convenience of all users, with the particular goal of creating a connected network of facilities accommodating each category of users, increasing connectivity across jurisdictional boundaries, and for accommodating existing and anticipated future areas of travel origination or destination. A well-connected network should include non-motorized connectivity to schools, parks, commercial areas, civic destinations and regional non-motorized networks on both publically owned roads/land and private developments (or redevelopment areas). c. Countywide Bicycle Advisory Committee (“CBAC”) Consultation. The County CBAC may review the design principles used by staff to accommodate motor vehicle, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit modes of travel when reviewing projects. The CBAC will be engaged early in the planning and design stage to provide an opportunity for comments and recommendations regarding Complete Street features of major public transportation projects. d. Evaluation. The County will establish a means to collect data and evaluate the implementation of Complete Streets policies. For example tracking the number of miles of paths, bike lanes and sidewalks, numbers of street crossings, signage etc. 3. EXCEPTIONS a. Required Findings and Leadership Approval for Exemptions. Plans or projects that seek exemptions from incorporating Complete Streets design principles must provide a written explanation of why accommodations for all modes were not included in the project. An exemption may be granted by the Director of Public Works or Director of Conservation and Development upon finding that inclusion of Complete Streets design principles are not possible or appropriate under one or more of the following circumstances: i. Bicycles or pedestrians are not permitted on the subject transportation facility pursuant to state or local laws; ii. Inclusion of Complete Streets design principles would result in a disproportionate cost to the project; iii. There is a documented absence of current and future need and demand for Complete Streets design elements on the subject roadway; and, iv. One or more significant adverse effects would outweigh the positive effects of implementing Complete Streets design elements. Plans or projects that are granted exceptions must be made available for public review. D. VISION ZERO CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Originally adopted by the Swedish parliament in October 1997, Vision Zero is a comprehensive set of policies that prioritize safety in the planning and implementation of transportation infrastructure projects that aim to achieve a transportation system with no road traffic fatalities or serious injuries. The County is developing a Vision Zero Plan (“Plan”) to address severe and fatal collisions on County-owned roadways. The Plan, to be considered by the BOS in the future, would include strategies moving the County Page | 8 towards the ultimate goal of zero fatalities and major injury collisions on its roadway network. The strategies outlined in the Plan include engineering, education, and/or enforcement measures, which implement the following primary goals: • Meet the requirement for the County to have an equivalent Local Road Safety Program (“LRSP”) in order to apply for certain grant funding. • Aim for the Vision Zero Program goal to eliminate fatal and serious injury collisions throughout the unincorporated road network. • Prioritize infrastructure projects that are in alignment with the Vision Zero Program through Engineering. • Develop a Vision Zero campaign that, if funding allows, can be used to engage the general public through Education and Engagement. • Eliminate high-risk behavior among the traveling public through Education and Enforcement. • Foster relationships among various agencies related to the Vision Zero Program and facilitate maintenance of these relationships into the future. LINK: County Vision Zero Program E. COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE The County Ordinance Code is the implementation tool of the General Plan and must be consistent with General Plan policies and land use designations. The County Ordinance Code contains specific provisions that address on and off-site circulation with the intent of preserving and improving the quality and efficiency of the County transportation system. All land development proposals must demonstrate compliance with these provisions. 1. SECTION 74-4.006 – ELECTRIC VEHICLE (“EV”) CHARGING In 2015, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 2015-22 amending the 2013 California Green Building Standards Code to establish electric vehicle parking and charging station building standards for the unincorporated County. County Code Section 74-4.006 - Amendments to CGBSC – Electric Vehicle (“EV”) Charging standards apply to residential (single and multi-family) and non-residential development. See Appendix A for a quick guide to calculating EV parking. LINK: County EV Ordinance 2. CHAPTER 82-16 – OFF-STREET PARKING The County’s Off-Street Parking Ordinance provides a unified set of standards for off-street vehicle and bicycle parking to meet the needs of persons employed at, or making use of, each land use during peak hours of parking needs. This chapter is intended to encourage the use of features, design strategies, materials, products, and best construction practices that preserve natural resources, conserve water and energy, and maximize energy efficiency in the design of parking facilities. This chapter also is intended to balance the needs of pedestrians, vehicles, bicycles, and public transportation. Page | 9 LINK: County Off-Street Parking Ordinance 3. CHAPTER 82-32 – TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT The County’s Transportation Demand Management (“TDM”) Ordinance intends to further the transportation goals of the County General Plan, the Measure J Growth Management Program, Contra Costa County's Congestion Management Program, and the Bay Area Clean Air Plan. Its purpose is to implement the provisions of the General Plan to promote a more balanced transportation system that takes advantage of all modes of transportation by: 1. Incorporating pedestrian, bicycle, and transit access into improvements proposed in development applications; 2. Incorporating the overall intent and purpose of this chapter into the land use review and planning process; 3. Allowing requests for reductions in the off-street parking requirements for residential or nonresidential projects that have a conceptual TDM Program; 4. Providing information to residents on opportunities for walking, bicycling, ridesharing and transit. The County TDM Ordinance applies to: 1. Residential projects containing thirteen or more dwelling units; and 2. Any non-residential or mixed-use development proposal. LINK: County TDM Ordinance 4. TITLE 9 - SUBDIVISIONS Title 9 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, known as the “Subdivision Ordinance,” contains regulations in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act. LINK: County Subdivision Ordinance F. CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY August 3, 1988, the Contra Costa Transportation Partnership Commission was created by the Mayors' Conference and the Board of Supervisors to provide a countywide forum for transportation issues and to propose ways to reduce traffic congestion. To achieve this goal, the Transportation Partnership Commission, also established as the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (“CCTA”) under State Law (SB 142), established principles to guide development of a Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan and to develop an Expenditure Plan for a one-half cent retail transactions and use tax measure which was approved by Contra Costa voters in November, 1988. CCTA, whose board is comprised of representation from all 19 cities, the unincorporated County and the transit agencies, is responsible for ensuring the completion of a wide variety of projects that were included in the original Measure C Expenditure Plan and the Measure J (approved by Contra Costa voters in November Page | 10 2004) Expenditure Plan. CCTA works cooperatively with local agencies on funding and implementation of transportation projects. 1. CCTA TECHNICAL PROCEDURES The purpose of this document is to establish a uniform approach, methodology, and tool set that public agencies in Contra Costa may apply to evaluate the impacts of land use decisions and related transportation projects on the local and regional transportation system. Compliance with the Measure J Growth Management Program requires that local jurisdictions use these Technical Procedures to analyze the impact of proposed development projects, General Plans, and General Plan Amendments. Where there are overlapping/conflicting policies the more conservative policy will prevail. 2. CCTA COUNTYWIDE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PLAN The Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (“CBPP”) builds on and expands the goals, policies and strategies of the Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP). Both plans set goals for increasing walking and bicycling and identify actions the Authority and its partners should take to achieve them. 3. CCTA ACTION PLANS FOR ROUTES OF REGIONAL SIGNIFICANCE The Action Plans are intended to establish quantitative service objectives by which we can gauge the progress of our transportation system and assess the impacts of land use decisions on the regional transportation system. Each Action Plan identifies a system of Regional Routes – those freeways, arterials and other facilities that provide the main connections among Contra Costa’s communities and to the surrounding areas. The Action Plans help local jurisdictions meet the requirement of the Measure J Growth Management Program (GMP) that requires local jurisdictions to participate in a cooperative, multi-jurisdictional planning process. 3. STAFF PROTOCOL FOR E VALUATING L AND D EVELOPMENT P ROPOSALS Each project planner, transportation planner, or engineer submitting transportation comments on a development application via email or memorandum is responsible for providing courtesy copies of these comments to their counterparts in Transportation Planning, Transportation Engineering, and Engineering Services who are also involved in reviewing that development application. County staff is encouraged to assemble project teams for large or complex development applications to assist in coordination efforts. While there may be exceptions, this protocol and these diagrams cover most circumstances that are likely to occur as development applications are evaluated for their transportation impacts. The department (either County Department of Conservation and Development (“DCD”) or Public Works Department (“PWD”)) with lead responsibility for review of transportation issues depends on the project. This protocol designates one department with lead responsibility for the following: • Informing Current Planning staff of their counterparts (DCD or PWD) who will also be involved in reviewing a development application for its transportation impacts; • Ensuring the transportation comments from both departments are submitted on time; Page | 11 • Ensuring the transportation comments from both departments are internally consistent; • Routing the proposal to the appropriate sub-regional transportation planning committee (“RTPC”) for review and comment; and • Managing the transportation consultants hired (if necessary) by the County. Please be aware that designation of lead responsibility as indicated in the following table does not limit the ability of other interested staff to comment on the transportation impacts of a development application. Type of Development Application Transportation Staff with Lead Responsibility General Plan Amendment DCD, Transportation Planning (“TP”) Other development application with ≥ 100 Peak Hour Trips DCD TP Other development application with < 100 Peak Hour Trips PWD, Engineering Services Division The flow charts provided below show the process for commenting on the major types of development applications. Page | 12 Project Planner circulates application Engineering Services comments on application Transportation Engineering comments on application Transportation Planning2 comments, identifies any conflicts in comments, manages studies, and submits comments/study to Project Planner Project Planner circulates application Transportation Engineering comments on application Engineering Services comments on application Transportation Planning2 comments, identifies any conflicts in comments, manages studies, and submits comments/study to Project Planner EXHIBIT B Flow Chart 1 PROCESS FOR TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS ON ALL GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS 1 Flow Chart 2 PROCESS FOR TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS ON OTHER APPLICATIONS WITH > 100 PEAK HOUR TRIPS3 Notes 1 No associated development application. 2 Indicates County staff with lead responsibility for coordinating transportation comments. 3 May include GPA application. Page | 13 EXHIBIT B – continued Flow Chart 3 PROCESS FOR TRANSPORTATION COMMENTS ON OTHER APPLICATIONS WITH < 100 PEAK HOUR TRIPS1 Project Planner circulates application Transportation Planning comments on application Transportation Engineering comments on application Engineering Services2 comments, identifies any conflicts in comments, manages studies, and submits comments/studies to Project Planner 4. TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS GUIDELINES The County General Plan establishes policies and standards to ensure the safe and efficient performance of the transportation system. Land development and transportation projects are evaluated against operational and efficiency standards like LOS and Vehicle Miles Traveled (“VMT”) to ensure optimal system performance, and compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) under project conditions. Using VMT as the CEQA analysis metric also assists in achieving the State’s long-term climate goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions (“GHG”). A. VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ANALYSIS Senate Bill 743 (Steinberg, 2013), which enacted Public Resources Code section 21099, required changes to the CEQA Guidelines establishing criteria for determining the significance of transportation impacts. These County Transportation Analysis Guidelines provide technical guidance regarding assessment of VMT, thresholds of significance, and mitigation measures for land development and transportation projects in the unincorporated area. 1. VMT SCREENING CRITERIA This section provides screening criteria in order to quickly determine if a proposed project should be expected to prepare a detailed VMT analysis. Absent substantial evidence indicating that a project would Page | 14 generate a potentially significant level of VMT, the following types of projects should be expected to cause a less-than-significant impact under CEQA and would not require further VMT analysis. i. Projects that: a. Generate or attract fewer than 110 daily vehicle trips 1; or, b. Projects of 10,000 square feet or less of non-residential space or 20 residential units or less, or otherwise generating less than 836 VMT per day. ii. Residential, retail, office projects, or mixed-use projects proposed within ½ mile of an existing major transit stop 2 or an existing stop along a high quality transit corridor 3. iii. Residential projects (home-based) at 15% or below the baseline County-wide home-based average VMT per capita, or employment projects (worker) at 15% or below the baseline Bay Area average commute VMT per employee in areas with low VMT that incorporate similar VMT reducing features (i.e., density, mix of uses, transit accessibility). iv. Public facilities (e.g. emergency services, passive parks (low-intensity recreation, open space), libraries, community centers, public utilities) and government buildings. 2. VMT METRICS Consistent with the OPR guidelines, the following specific VMT metrics are recommended to complete a VMT impact assessment: Residential Projects: VMT per resident for all home-based trips. Employment Projects: VMT per Employee for only the home-based-work trip purpose and would apply to office, industrial, and institutional projects. Regional Retail (>50,000 square feet): Total VMT per service population for trips taken by both workers and visitors. 1 CEQA provides a categorical exemption for existing facilities, including additions to existing structures of up to 10,000 square feet, so long as the project is in an area where public infrastructure is available to allow for maximum planned development and the project is not in an environmentally sensitive area. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15301, subd. (e)(2).). Typical project types for which trip generation increases relatively linearly with building footprint (i.e., general office building, single tenant office building, office park, and business park) generate or attract an additional 110-124 trips per 10,000 square feet. Therefore, absent substantial evidence otherwise, it is reasonable to conclude that the addition of 110 or fewer trips could be considered not to lead to a significant impact. 2 Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 (“‘Major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.”). 3 Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 (“For purposes of this section, a high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.”). Page | 15 Mixed-Use: Total VMT per service population. (Use the CCTA model and analyze the project in its entirety.) Other: Total VMT per service population for trips taken by both workers and visitors. 3. VMT FORECASTING For proposed projects that have not been screened out of analyzing VMT impacts under CEQA, a full VMT analysis will be required. VMT should be estimated using the CCTA model to generate estimates of both partial and total VMT for the project. It is recommended that average trip length information and estimated VMT for a proposed project be obtained for each trip purpose by either: • Inserting the proposed project into the CCTA Countywide Model. Using the CCTA model to determine both trip generation and trip lengths allows consistent analysis methodology; or, • Utilizing existing average trip length data of similar Traffic Analysis Zones (“TAZ”) that contain similar mixes of land uses. County staff must approve the use of VMT forecasting methodologies inconsistent with the guidance provide above. Cumulative VMT Impacts Cumulative impacts should be evaluated for consistency with the County General Plan (Envision 2040). For example, if a project is consistent with the County General Plan (Envision 2040) and the General Plan remains consistent with its VMT projections as originally analyzed, the project’s cumulative impacts shall be less-than significant. However, if the project is inconsistent with the adopted County General Plan, then the analysis should evaluate the project’s cumulative VMT impacts and determine if the Countywide VMT increases or decreases with the proposed project relative to the VMT generated by full General Plan buildout. If the Cumulative Plus Project analysis indicates that total VMT remains at or below the VMT generated by full General Plan buildout and the project is aligned with the County General Plan’s relevant goals and policies, then the project would be considered to have a less-than significant cumulative impact. Alternatively, a significant impact would occur if the proposed project increases total VMT compared to the County General Plan (Envision 2040) assumptions. 4. VMT THRESHOLDS The CEQA thresholds of significance (“TOS”) impact criteria provided below require the proposed project’s transportation impact analysis to compare the VMT per person/employee to the VMT per person/employee for the County or Bay Area region. A proposed project should be considered to have a significant impact if the project VMT is greater than: • Residential Projects: 15% below the County-wide average home-based VMT per capita. Page | 16 • Employment Projects (office, industrial and institutional projects): 15% below the Bay Area average commute VMT per employee. • Regional Retail (>50,000 square feet): 15% below Bay Area average total VMT per service population. • Mixed-Use Projects: 15% below the County-wide average total VMT per service population. 5. VMT MITIGATION The traffic impact analysis should develop and incorporate appropriate mitigation measures to offset traffic impacts that are found to have exceeded the identified threshold(s) of significance. Three options exist under CEQA when the transportation analysis identifies significant impacts: • Modify the proposed project to eliminate or substantially lessen all significant effects on the environment where feasible; • Determine that any remaining significant effects on the environment found to be unavoidable under CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 are acceptable due to overriding concerns as described in Section 15093; or • Deny the project. To mitigate VMT impacts the applicant shall consider, but not be limited to, the following: • Modify project design features and/or land uses to reduce project trips or reduce trip length. • Moving the proposed development to a more travel-efficient area (i.e. area with access to high quality transit, or other transportation solutions that reduce the length/number of trips). • Look for other measures to reduce trip lengths or the number of trips generated through the use of transportation demand management (“TDM”) measures. Example TDM strategies are provided in Appendix B and in the County TDM Guidelines. • A toolkit of urban design and land use strategies from other agencies (e.g. CCTA), with a presumed VMT reduction tied to each strategy. • A fair share payment toward a regional program designed to reduce VMT, if available. Proposed projects shall also utilize the latest version of the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (“CAPCOA”) Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures 4 document to estimate the maximum feasible VMT mitigation. However, it should be noted that most of the data used to develop the CAPCOA mitigation strategies are based on projects from urban or relatively dense 4 CAPCOA Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, http://www.capcoa.org/documents/ Page | 17 suburban areas. The effectiveness of VMT mitigations will vary from project to project based on the surrounding land use context, the combination of its uses, and the availability of alternative transportation modes. The proposed project’s transportation impact analysis must quantifiably demonstrate, through the use of reliable calculation tools, proposed VMT mitigations will result in the estimated reductions when applied to the project. In the event a proposed project’s characteristics render most or all of the aforementioned mitigation strategies infeasible or ineffective, County staff will consider other mitigations options. 6. TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS Many transportation projects change travel patterns. A transportation project which leads to additional vehicle travel on the roadway network, commonly referred to as “induced vehicle travel,” would need to quantify the amount of additional vehicle travel in order to assess air quality impacts, greenhouse gas emissions impacts, energy impacts, and noise impacts. Transportation projects also are required to examine induced growth impacts under CEQA 5. If a transportation project would likely lead to a measurable and substantial increase in vehicle travel (i.e. increase total VMT), it is presumed to be a significant impact and an analysis assessing the amount of vehicle travel the project will induce shall be conducted. Absent substantial evidence indicating that a project would generate a potentially significant level of VMT, transportation projects that can be presumed to lower VMT or have no effect on it, such as bike and pedestrian projects, transit improvements, and minor operational improvements, as defined in the State Office of Planning Research Technical Advisory (December 2018), should be expected to cause a less-than-significant impact under CEQA and would not require further VMT analysis. B. LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS When evaluating the effects of development projects on the performance of the unincorporated County’s transportation facilities, the County applies operational standards to ensure the levels of growth and development provided in the County General Plan Land Use Element are sufficiently accommodated. Applicants may be required to prepare a LOS operational analysis if any of the following apply to a proposed project: • Development project that generates 100 or more net new peak hour vehicle trips; • Development project that adds 50 or more net new peak hour vehicle trips to an intersection; • Project that creates safety or operational concerns 6. Identifying improvements to address operational deficiencies would not be required under the following circumstances: • Development projects where the addition of project traffic to an intersection(s) results in the degradation of intersection operations from acceptable LOS D or better to unacceptable 5 State of California Office of Planning and Research, Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018) 6 OPR, SB 743 Safety Technical Advisory: http://opr.ca.gov/docs/OPR_Appendix_B_final.pdf Page | 18 operations (LOS E or LOS F), except for intersections within Priority Development Areas (“PDA”) where the minimum acceptable operational standard is LOS E; • Development projects where the addition of project traffic to an intersection(s) operating unacceptably before the addition of project trips results in the exacerbation of unacceptable operations, but only increases the average control delay (for signalized and all-way stop- controlled intersections) or worst movement/approach delay (for side-street stop-controlled intersections) at the intersection by 5.0 seconds or less; County staff also reserves the right to require an applicant to prepare additional traffic analysis based on unanticipated project factors, site specific special concerns or other unanticipated issues, including after the transportation analysis scope is approved. 1. LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS SCOPE AND OPERATIONAL STANDARDS The operations of transportation facilities are typically described with the term LOS, a qualitative description of traffic flow based on such factors as speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Six levels are defined from LOS A, as the best operating conditions, to LOS F, or the worst operating conditions. LOS E represents “at-capacity” operations. When traffic volumes exceed capacity, stop-and-go conditions result and operations are designated as LOS F. The method used for evaluating LOS shall be the method defined in the latest version of the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual (“HCM”), unless directed otherwise by the County. This method bases intersection operations on the average vehicular control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and acceleration delay. The average control delay for intersections should be calculated using the latest version of Synchro analysis software, unless directed otherwise by the County. Table 1 and Table 2 below provide LOS grades and correlating qualitative descriptions for signalized and unsignalized intersection operations. TABLE 1: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS CRITERIA Level of Service Description Delay in Seconds A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle lengths. ≤ 10.0 B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. > 10.0 to 20.0 C Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear. > 20.0 to 35.0 D Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, and high volume- to-capacity (V/C) ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. > 35.0 to 55.0 E Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. > 55.0 to 80.0 Page | 19 F Operations with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over-saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. > 80.0 Source: 2010 Highway Capacity Manual TABLE 2: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS CRITERIA Level of Service Description Delay in Seconds A Little or no delay. ≤ 10.0 B Short traffic delays. 10.1 to 15.0 C Average traffic delays. 15.1 to 25.0 D Long traffic delays. 25.1 to 35.0 E Very long traffic delays. 35.1 to 50.0 F Extreme traffic delays with intersection capacity exceeded. > 50.0 Source: 2010 Highway Capacity Manual 2. TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES Trip generation estimates shall be developed using the latest version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (“ITE”) Trip Generation Manual. County staff may approve the use of other trip generation rates due to unique characteristics of a proposed project. In cases where the published ITE trip generation rates are based on very limited data, rates shall be verified through alternative source documents or local peak- period field observation of similar uses. 3. ADJUSTMENTS TO TRIP GENERATION RATES Trip generation rates represent an average rate for a number of observed projects. However, some projects may include specific characteristics that call for adjustments to the average rate to reflect its trip generation characteristics adequately. County staff will use professional judgment in applying any proposed adjustment. The reasons for the adjustment shall be documented in the traffic analysis. A summary of these adjustments and their potential effects on trip generation is outlined in Table 3. Table 3: Summary of Trip Generation Adjustments Adjustment Expected Range of Adjustment (%) Description Transit Usage1 +3 to –3 Any transit usage adjustments to the project trip generation rates should be applied only to home-based work (“HBW”) trips. Use the CCTA countywide travel demand model modal split results to verify mode choice information. TDM1 +10 to –10 Should reflect local experience as indicated in annual survey results or other data for similar types and sizes of development, and apply only to the generation of HBW trips. Page | 20 Pass-By2 0 to –60 Applies to shopping centers, fast food restaurants, and other retail uses. Mixed-Use 0 to –6 Applies to mixes of residential and commercial uses. Multi-Use2 0 to –25 Applies to multi-use commercial sites expected to attract multi-purpose trips Surrounding Uses 0 to –5 Projects may have the ability to reduce VMT and encourage use of alternative transportation modes. For example, development in a suburban environment isolated from retail/commercial services might have higher trip rates than those within easier walking distance. 1 The combined Transit and TDM reductions should not exceed 10%. 2 If Pass-By or Multi-Use trip generation reductions are used, no other reductions are permitted. 4. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Project generated trips can be distributed and assigned manually using the model to predict background traffic. Existing directional split information, turning movement counts, and local knowledge may all contribute to predicting the distribution of project trips. For most projects, manual assignment techniques (e.g. TRAFFIX software) can adequately assess intersection impacts. A preliminary trip distribution pattern should be submitted in the proposed project scope for review and approval by County staff. Trip distribution may be further refined after consultation with County staff, even after a transportation analysis work scope is agreed upon. 5. SELECTION OF STUDY INTERSECTIONS As a rule, in addition to the intersections adjacent to the proposed project site, the analysis should include any intersection to which at least 50 net new peak hour vehicle trips would be added by the project. Study intersections should be selected without consideration for jurisdictional boundaries. Additional study intersections may be selected after County staff has reviewed the trip generation, distribution and assignment of a proposed project. Engineering judgment may be used to eliminate intersections from the analysis that are not controlling intersections or where critical movements are not affected as the project only adds through movements. The elimination of study intersections where 50 or more trips are projected to be added by the project must be done in consultation with the County Traffic Engineer, or with the staff of the jurisdiction that maintains the intersection. The traffic study must fully document the rationale for eliminating intersections from the analysis. Study intersections should also include arterial and ramp intersections along defined Routes of Regional Significance, as appropriate. When the proposed project adds more than 50 net new peak hour vehicle trips to a freeway ramp, the project should be evaluated against the freeway multi-modal transportation service objectives (“MTSOs”) provided in the Action Plans adopted by the RTPC. 6. TRAFFIC COUNTING PROTOCOL Page | 21 Traffic counts for traffic impact studies, level of service monitoring, and any other application intended to represent prevailing traffic conditions at a given location should be conducted in accordance with the following provisions: a. During Fair Weather – Counts shall be conducted in fair weather, without rain, flooding, heavy winds, or other adverse weather conditions that could disrupt the flow of traffic; b. On Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday of a non-holiday week when public schools are in session – which may include but not be limited to New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King Day, President’s Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran’s Day, Thanksgiving, and Christmas. (Refer to school district calendar for official holidays.) c. Typical School Day –Counts should be taken on typical school days avoiding half days, late start days and early-dismissal days whenever possible. d. No major road closings – if temporary road closings have occurred that affect traffic flow at the count location, the count should be postponed until the road is re-opened. If the road closing is to be for an extended period, and a count needs to be conducted, the count results should be annotated to reflect the road closure conditions. e. No construction activity – Counts should not be conducted in the presence of construction activity that could disrupt the arrival or departure of traffic at the count location. f. No incidents or accidents – If an incident or accident has occurred in the vicinity of the count location, or if such an event occurs during the count, the count should be discarded, and repeated at a later date. In the event that a traffic count is conducted specifically to observe conditions under provisions a-f above, the prevalence of such condition(s) shall be documented in the traffic analysis. 7. ANALYSIS The traffic operations analysis shall include, as a minimum, consideration of the following scenarios: Existing Conditions – This scenario evaluates transportation facilities based on volumes, lane geometry and traffic controls at the time of analysis. Existing plus Project Conditions – Existing Conditions with the addition of traffic from the proposed project. Near-term Conditions –Existing Conditions with the addition of trips added by the full buildout of entitled projects in the study area. Near-term plus Project Conditions –Near-term Conditions with the addition of traffic from the proposed project. Cumulative Conditions – This scenario evaluates horizon year conditions with the implementation of all approved land use changes and any development that is consistent with the General Plan and expected to Page | 22 occur within the time frame of the project. It will also include transportation projects programmed for implementation prior to the horizon year and any programmed capital improvements. Cumulative plus Project Conditions – Cumulative Conditions with the addition of traffic from the proposed project. 8. OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS The traffic analysis must recommend appropriate treatments for the transportation system to offset operational deficiencies that are found to have exceeded operational standards for the unincorporated County. Furthermore, as appropriate, the traffic analysis must disclose any secondary operational deficiencies that the proposed treatments could generate. For example, the secondary operational deficiency generated by adding approach lanes to an intersection could include an increase in pedestrian crossing time. In the event a treatment is programmed in the County CRIPP, each development will be required to provide fair-share funding for the programmed project(s). Proposed projects may also be required by Measure J to participate in the appropriate RTPC regional transportation improvement program. Page | 23 5. APPENDICES A. Electric Vehicle Charging Chart B. TDM Strategies C. California Environmental Quality Act Checklist (Transportation) California Green Building Code/Contra Costa County Electric Vehicle Service Equipment (“EVSE”) Requirements  1 Dedicated 208/240‐volt branch circuit; service panel and/or subpanel shall provide capacity to install a 40‐ampere minimum dedicated branch circuit and space(s) reserved to permit installation of a branch circuit overcurrent protective device 2013 Title 24, Part 11, California Green Building CodeSummary Table MANDATORY MEASURES(effective July 1, 2015) VOLUNTARY MEASURESTIER 1 VOLUNTARY MEASURESTIER 2 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MANDATORY MEASURES One‐and Two‐Family w/attached private garages For each dwelling unit, install a listed raceway to accommodate a dedicated 208/240‐volt branch circuit Multi‐family 17+ multifamily units, 3 percent of total parking spaces (minimum 1 space) shall be  capable of supporting future electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS)  17+ multifamily units, 5 percent of total parking spaces (minimum 1 space) shall be  capable of supporting future electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS) 5 percent of total parking spaces (minimum 1 space) shall install fully operational (minimum Level 2 or higher1) electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS) Non‐Residential Construction shall facilitate future installation of electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) Provide fully operational EVCS MANDATORYTIER 1TIER 2MANDATORY TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES NUMBER OF REQUIRED EV CHARGING SPACES TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES TIER 1 NUMBER OF REQUIRED EV CHARGING SPACES TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES TIER 2 NUMBER OF REQUIRED EV CHARGING SPACES TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES NUMBER OF REQUIRED EV CHARGING SPACES  1‐10 0  11‐25 2 0‐500 0‐50 10‐50226‐50 3 51‐751 51‐75 251‐75351‐75 5 76‐1002 76‐100 376‐100476‐100 6 101‐2003 101‐2005101‐2007101‐200 12 201+3%*201+ 4%*201+6%*201+ 6%* *Calculation for spaces shall be rounded up to the nearest whole number. Page | 25 B. TDM STRATEGIES Potential measures 7 to reduce vehicle miles traveled include, but are not limited to: • Improve or increase access to transit. • Increase access to common goods and services, such as groceries, schools, and daycare. • Incorporate affordable housing into the project. • Incorporate neighborhood electric vehicle network. • Orient the project toward transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities. • Improve pedestrian or bicycle networks, or transit service. • Provide traffic calming. • Provide bicycle parking. • Limit or eliminate parking supply. • Unbundle parking costs. • Provide parking cash-out programs. • Implement roadway pricing. • Implement or provide access to a commute reduction program. • Provide car-sharing, bike sharing, and ride-sharing programs. • Provide transit passes. • Shifting single occupancy vehicle trips to carpooling or vanpooling, for example providing ride- matching services. • Providing telework options. • Providing incentives or subsidies that increase the use of modes other than single-occupancy vehicle. • Providing on-site amenities at places of work, such as priority parking for carpools and vanpools, secure bike parking, and showers and locker rooms. • Providing employee transportation coordinators at employment sites. • Providing a guaranteed ride home service to users of non-auto modes. Example TDM strategies are provided in the County TDM Guidelines. A transportation impact analysis must quantifiably demonstrate, through the use of reliable calculation tools, proposed VMT mitigations will result in the estimated reductions when applied to the proposed project. 7 State of California Office of Planning and Research, Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018) Page | 26 C. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT CHECKLIST (TRANSPORTATION) CEQA Guidelines (2020) APPENDIX G: Environmental Checklist Form Section XVII. TRANSPORTATION. Would the project: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities?     b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?     c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?     d) Result in inadequate emergency access?     RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, to pay $10,460 to Staff Care, Inc. for the provision of temporary locum tenens physician services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period May 1, 2019 through May 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: On March 28, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-294-40 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #26-294-41) with Staff care, Inc., to provide temporary locum tenens physician services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019. The Contractor met the Contract payment limit of $9,033,000 and due to a billing error, an additional invoice in the amount of $10,460 for services provided in May 2019 was not received by County until February 2020. The total billed for the contract term of January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2019 was APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 70 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Payment for Services Provided by Staff Care, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) $9,043,760, exceeding the contract payment limit by $10,460. The Contractor is entitled to payment for the reasonable value of its services under the equitable relief theory of quantum meruit. That theory provides that where a contractor has been asked to provide services without a valid contract, and the contractor does so to the benefit of the County, the Contractor is entitled to recover the reasonable value of those services. The Contractor has provided services at the request of the County after the original contract payment limit had been reached. The Department cannot pay Contractor for services rendered that exceed the contract limits. As such, the Department recommends that the Board authorize the Auditor-Controller to issue a one-time payment not to exceed $10,460 to Staff Care, Inc. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Board Order is not approved, the Contractor will not be paid for services requested by County staff and provided by Contractor. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and Authorize the County Librarian, or designee, to relocate surplus furniture and shelving from the Pleasant Hill Library to the Contra Costa County Historical Society, the Friends of the Pleasant Hill Library, the City of Pleasant Hill and the Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder's Office. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On March 10, 2020 the Board of Supervisors approved the permanent closure of the Pleasant Hill Library at 1750 Oak Park Blvd. With the temporary relocation of Library services, the Library has assessed the furniture and shelving at the closed site, and determined they no longer have a need for it. They have identified several partner organizations whom may be interested in the items, and made arrangements accordingly. County Surplus will remove furniture, fixtures and equipment (FF&E) of value, however other furniture and shelving identified for use can be donated to the following organizations; Contra Costa County Historical Society to house the recently transferred history collection, the Friends of the Pleasant Hill APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Alison McKee, 510-332-7386 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 71 To:Board of Supervisors From:Melinda Cervantes, County Librarian Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Relocation of miscellaneous furniture and shelving from the Pleasant Hill Library BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Library for their temporary bookstore, the City of Pleasant Hill for the temporary library and the Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder Office. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Usable furniture and shelving will be discarded and not continue to support library-related functions. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. ACKNOWLEDGE receipt of Civil Grand Jury Report No. 2004, entitled "Police Department Staffing" (attached), and the subsequent response from the Sheriff-Coroner (attached); 2. APPROVE the Board of Supervisors' response to Civil Grand Jury Report No. 2004 (attached); and 3. DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to forward the response to the Superior Court immediately following Board action. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On May 15, 2020, the 2019/20 Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury filed the above referenced report. Per standard procedures, a response to the Superior Court were to be provided from the Sheriff-Coroner no later than July 14, 2020 (60 days) and from the Board of Supervisors's no later August 13, 2020 (90 days). On May 27, 2020, the Sheriff-Coroner provided the Superior Court a response to Findings APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Paul Reyes, 925-335-1096 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 72 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Grand Jury Report No. 2004 - "Police Department Staffing" BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) 1-14 and Recommendation 3-5. The County Administrator has prepared a response to Findings 6-8 and Recommendation 1 for consideration by the Board of Supervisors, which clearly specifies: whether a finding or recommendation is accepted or will be implemented; if a recommendation is accepted, a statement as to who will be responsible for implementation and by what definite target date; a delineation of the constraints if a recommendation is accepted but cannot be implemented within a six-month period; and the reason for not accepting or adopting a finding or recommendation. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: In order to comply with statutory requirements, the Board of Supervisors must provide a response to the Superior Court within ninety days of submission of the report. ATTACHMENTS Grand Jury Report No. 2004 - "Police Department Staffing" Sheriff's Office Response to Grand Jury Report No. 2004 BOS Response to Grand Jury Report No. 2004 Page 1 of 2 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY REPORT NO. 2004 "Police Department Staffing ” BOARD OF SUPERVISORS’ RESPONSE FINDINGS – California Penal Code Section 933.5(a) requires a response to the designated findings of the Grand Jury. F6. Recruiting officers is challenging due to fewer applicants who meet the required hiring standards and complete the rigorous testing process. Response: Agree. F7. Negative perceptions of policing and the availability of less dangerous job opportunities contribute to fewer applicants for law enforcement positions. Response: Agree. F8. Each Contra Costa police agency (except those that contract with the Sheriff's Office) conducts its own recruiting program to attract potential applicants. Response: Agree. Each city police agency is a separate legal entity distinct from Contra Costa County each with their own separate governing body (i.e. City Council) and unique recruitment and hiring practice . Page 2 of 2 RECOMMENDATIONS - California Penal Code Section 933.05(b) requires a response to the designated recommendations of the Grand Jury. R1. The Board of Supervisors should consider identifying funds to develop a countywide outreach program to attract more applicants to police agencies in Contra Costa County, by June 30, 2021. Response: The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or is not reasonable. Each law enforcement agency has their own unique recruitment and hiring practice, along with corresponding budgets for recruitment efforts. Consolidating several unique recruitment practices and policies across several law enforcement agencies into a consolidated countywide outreach program is not economically feasible. RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE Civil Grand Jury Report No. 2005, entitled "Public Safety Power Shutoff" (attached), and REFER to the County Administrator and Sheriff-Coroner for response. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On May 21, 2020, the 2019/20 Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury filed the above referenced report. Per standard procedures, this action alerts the Board of Supervisors that the report has been received and directs the appropriate staff to review the report, provide the Board of Supervisors with an appropriate response, and forward the Sheriff-Coroner's response to the Superior Court no later than July 20, 2020 (60 days) and the Board of Supervisors's response no later August 19, 2020 (90 days). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: There is no immediate consequence. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Paul Reyes, 335-1096 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 73 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Grand Jury Report No. 2005 - "Public Safety Power Shutoff" ATTACHMENTS Grand Jury Report No. 2005 - Public Safety Power Shutoff RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE Civil Grand Jury Report No. 2006, entitled "Juveniles in Detention" (attached), and REFER to the County Administrator and the Chief Probation Officer for response. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On May 27, 2020, the 2019/20 Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury filed the above referenced report. Per standard procedures, this action alerts the Board of Supervisors that the report has been received and directs the appropriate staff to review the report, provide the Board of Supervisors with an appropriate response, and forward that response to the Superior Court no later than August 25, 2020 (90 days). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: There is no immediate consequence. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Paul Reyes, 335-1096 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 74 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Grand Jury Report No. 2006 ATTACHMENTS Grand Jury Report No. 2006 - Juveniles in Detention RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Public Safety Realignment FY 2018/19 AB 109 Annual Report, which was prepared by the Office of Reentry and Justice and recommended for acceptance by the Community Corrections Partnership at its June 5, 2020 meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: This is for information only, and there is no fiscal impact for this item. BACKGROUND: The County Administrator’s Office has commissioned the preparation of a Public Safety Realignment AB 109 Annual Report since FY 2014-15. The FY 2018-19 Annual Report has been prepared by the Office of Reentry and Justice (ORJ) in collaboration with all AB 109-funded County departments/agencies/divisions, the Superior Court, and community-based organizations engaged in reentry service provision. The report draws from a template prepared by Resource Development Associates (RDA), with oversight from the Quality Assurance Committee (QAC) of the Community Corrections Partnership (CCP). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lara DeLaney, (925) 335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 75 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:Public Safety Realignment AB 109 Annual Report for FY 2018/19 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The AB 109 Annual Report provides an overview of AB 109-related activities undertaken in Contra Costa County during the fiscal year 2018/19, with a focus on understanding the impact of AB 109-funded County departments, divisions, programs, and contracted service providers. Toward this end, this report describes the volume and type of services provided by all of the County’s AB 109 partners over the course of the year. The FY 2018-19 Annual Report is Attachment A. Contra Costa County has responded to AB 109 Public Safety Realignment in a manner that has allowed the County to provide supervision and services to the AB 109 population, while building a collaborative reentry infrastructure to support the reentry population’s successful reintegration into the community. The County has followed best practice models in establishing access to services through the West County Reentry Success Center’s “one-stop” model and the Central & East County Reentry Network’s “no wrong door” approach. During the 2018/19 Fiscal Year, a number of key changes and investments further refined the County’s approach to AB 109, as well as reentry more generally. These included: The Requests for Proposals (“RFP”) procurement process to identify vendors to provide reentry services to residents returning to local communities is a focus of work for the ORJ. This process in FY 18/19 resulted in new or continuing contracts with community-based organizations for a 3-year term beginning July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. The conclusion of the Pre-Release Planning Pilot project which ended in May 2019. Overall, the results from the pilot point to a promising program particularly as it relates to engagement in community-based post-release services. Engagement in post-release services was found to be positively associated with employment. Given that employment is a critical factor in reentry success, this was a particularly notable finding. Given the positive results of the pilot program, the County Office of Education has assumed the responsibility for the program which has been branded “Game Plan for Success” (GPS). The Youth Justice Initiative (YJI), a multi-year project funded by the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) was also completed in FY 18/19. This pilot provided integrated prevention and intervention activities at key points along the spectrum from school to detention and reentry and applied innovative practices with an aim to shift culture and staff interaction with youth. The pilot was found to effectively shift school culture, thereby reducing suspensions and truancy rates, and support from a point person who assisted with reentry needs and problems was found to be invaluable to youths’ successful transition. CeaseFire hosted a retreat in FY 18/19 that served to reinvigorate and further enhance community partnerships. A guest speaker from the National Institute of Criminal Justice Reform outlined a framework for the establishment of criteria necessary to classify individuals at high risk. As a result, the program was situated to develop a list of high-risk individuals for on-going contact. The Public Defender’s Office expanded its successful Early Representation (EarlyRep) pilot program to all three regions of the County in FY 18/19 with the Central County Program launched in September 2019 through a partnership with the California Highway Patrol. The program reached about 2,500 participants through its first two and a half years of operation reducing the rate of failures to appear for court from 57% to 17%. The success of the EarlyRep program launched the development of the “Holistic Intervention Partnership” (HIP), a public-private partnership between the Contra Costa County Office of the Public Defender, multiple County agencies, and community-based partners. Funded by the JAG, HIP seeks to provide interdisciplinary case management and navigation services to indigent individuals to ensure timely and coordinated access to a client-centered array of housing, behavioral health, transportation and legal services at the critical time of initial law enforcement contact. The Board of Supervisors’ (BOS) 17-member Racial Justice Task Force (RJTF) completed its Final Report in June 2018 and submitted it to the Board of Supervisors for adoption in July 2018. The Task Force was commissioned with identifying racial disparities in the local justice system and providing the Board of Supervisors with a set of recommendations on how these disparities might be addressed and reduced. Implementation of the adopted recommendations is expected to begin in FY 19/20 through the Board’s established Racial Justice Oversight Body (RJOB). Assembled by ORJ staff, the County’s first Draft Racial Equity Action Plan (REAP) was developed in FY 18/19 by County employees participating in the Government Alliance on Race and Equity (GARE) in 2016, 2017 and 2018. The draft REAP is offered as a framework to continue to advance the development and maintenance of the necessary County infrastructure, policy and resources to ensure racial equity and immigrant inclusion. ORJ staff will support the community engagement process, as needed, and is in the process of identifying resources to translate the draft REAP into multiple languages for greater language accessibility. Led and coordinated by ORJ, Fogbreak Justice conducted a training and assessment program designed to promote the accessibility, fairness and effectiveness of government by teaching the concept and practices of procedural justice and implicit bias to County and community partners. This training program was well received by its participants. Therefore, ORJ plans to continue to provide a procedural justice and implicit bias workshop and an advanced racial equity training to the RJOB and other County and community partners. The District Attorney’s Office secured a $1 million Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) Youth Reinvestment Grant in FY 18/19 to start a pilot juvenile diversion program in FY 19/20. Recognizing persistent racial and ethnic disparities in youth contact with the juvenile and criminal justice systems, the District Attorney will partner with RYSE to create the County’s first pre-charge diversion program and use restorative justice alternatives to reduce justice related costs, enhance victim satisfaction and reduce recidivism. In April 2019, funded by the County’s FY 18/19 Local Innovation Fund, ORJ partnered with Jeweld Legacy Group (JLG), HealthRIGHT 360 and the Reentry Success Center, to produce a capacity building symposium for participating community-based reentry service providers throughout the County. In all, 29 individuals attended the symposium including 16 participants from CBOs and the remaining 13 participants representing government agencies. Based on the evaluations survey completed, the majority of participants indicated a high level of satisfaction with the symposium and acknowledged increase in new skills, knowledge and resources. The JLG is expected to provide two more symposiums or sharing learning events in FY 19/20 and FY 20/21 with one related to successful reentry for young people up to age 25, and a second focused on characteristics of effective reentry and diversion programming. In June 2019, in partnership with Jeweld Legacy Group and George Mason University, Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence (ACE!), ORJ provided a workshop on Risk, Needs and Responsivity (RNR) Principles and Practices. This workshop was provided in response to a level of interest in the RNR model and the County’s investment in integrating these principles into its reentry practices. Two more RNR model related workshops will be conducted in FY 19/20 to complete the program assessment and the system assessment phases of the project for the County. In addition to the AB 109 Annual Reports, Since FY 2015-16, Quarterly Data Reports have been provided to the ORJ by AB 109-funded County and community-based partners. These quarterly reports present an overview of AB 109-funded service and programmatic volume and outcomes provided to individuals in the County who are returning to the community from custody and include the following information: · Performance and Demographic Data Measures · Budget Expenditures · Programmatic or Operational Changes · Concerns/Changes with Organizational Context or Partners · Programmatic Outcomes, Lessons Learned · Next Steps These quarterly reports have formed the backbone of the data for the AB 109 Annual Reports. Effective FY 19/20, the quarterly reports transitioned to Semi-Annual Reports. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - FY 2018/19 AB 109 Annual Report Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 1 Public Safety Realignment in Contra Costa County AB 109 Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 Prepared by the Office of Reentry & Justice Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 2 Staff Assigned to CCP Paul Reyes, Senior Deputy County Administrator Lara DeLaney, Office of Reentry & Justice, Acting Director Donté Blue, Office of Reentry & Justice, Deputy Director This AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2018/19 was prepared by Denise Zabkiewicz, Research and Evaluation Manager, in the Office of Reentry & Justice. For questions regarding this report, please contact Denise Zabkiewicz via email at: Denise.Zabkiewicz@cao.cccounty.us. 2019 Community Corrections Partnership (CCP) of Contra Costa County Todd Billeci, Chief Probation Officer, Chair Donna Van Wert, Workforce Development Board Executive Director David Livingston, Sheriff of Contra Costa County Patrice Guillory, Community Based Programs Representative Tammany Brooks, Antioch Chief of Police Kathy Gallagher, Employment and Human Services Director Diana Becton, District Attorney Matthew White, Behavioral Health Services Director Jim Paulsen, Superior Court designee David Twa, County Administrator Robin Lipetzky, Public Defender Fatima Matal Sol, Alcohol and Other Drug Services, Director Vacant, Victim's Representative Lynn Mackey, County Superintendent of Schools Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 3 Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 14 A Note on Data ............................................................................................................................... 14 Realignment & Reentry in Contra Costa County ......................................................................................... 15 Historical Overview of AB 109 & Legislative Impacts .................................................................... 15 Public Safety Realignment in Contra Costa County ....................................................................... 16 County Department Impacts....................................................................................................................... 18 District Attorney’s Office ............................................................................................................... 18 Office of the Public Defender ........................................................................................................ 20 Pre-trial Services ............................................................................................................................ 22 Office of the Sheriff ........................................................................................................................ 26 Probation Department ................................................................................................................... 30 Detention Health Services ............................................................................................................. 33 Health Services ............................................................................................................................... 34 Alcohol and Other Drugs ................................................................................................... 35 Mental Health Division ..................................................................................................... 36 Public Benefits .................................................................................................................. 36 Homeless Services............................................................................................................. 37 Workforce Development Board ..................................................................................................... 38 Community Based Service Providers .......................................................................................................... 39 Shared values/approach (EBPs, TIC approach, etc.) ...................................................................... 39 Countywide .................................................................................................................................... 40 Overview of AB 109 Community Partnerships .............................................................................. 42 Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 4 Bay Area Legal Aid............................................................................................................. 43 Center for Human Development ...................................................................................... 44 Centerforce ....................................................................................................................... 44 Fast Eddie’s Auto Services ................................................................................................ 44 Goodwill Industries ........................................................................................................... 44 Men and Women of Purpose ............................................................................................ 45 Mz. Shirliz .......................................................................................................................... 45 Rubicon ............................................................................................................................. 45 SHELTER Inc. ...................................................................................................................... 46 Public Safety ................................................................................................................................................ 47 AB 109 Police Officers .................................................................................................................... 47 Mental Health Evaluation Teams ................................................................................................... 47 Central-East County Ceasefire ....................................................................................................... 48 AB 109 Population Outcomes ..................................................................................................................... 49 Supervision Sanctions .................................................................................................................... 49 New Charges and Convictions........................................................................................................ 50 Looking Ahead to Fiscal Year 2019/20 ........................................................................................................ 51 Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 5 Table of Figures Figure 1: Types of AB 109 supervision revocations ................................................................................... 19 Figure 2: Types of supervision revocations as a percentage of all AB 109 revocations ............................ 19 Figure 3: Number of individuals served by Public Defender Social Workers ............................................ 21 Figure 4: Number of clients released on OR and ACER dispositions ......................................................... 21 Figure 5: Clean Slate petitions filed and granted ....................................................................................... 22 Figure 6: PTS clients assessed for Pre-trial risk .......................................................................................... 23 Figure 7: PTS clients being monitored and successfully completed .......................................................... 24 Figure 8: Count of PTS assessed clients starting Pre-trial monitoring by risk level ................................... 24 Figure 9: Percentage of assessed clients starting Pre-trial monitoring, by risk level ................................ 25 Figure 10: Pre-trial monitoring case closures ............................................................................................ 25 Figure 11: Unsuccessful Pre-trial monitoring case closures, by type ........................................................ 26 Figure 12: AB 109 bookings, by type – Martinez Detention Facility .......................................................... 27 Figure 13: Average daily jail population ..................................................................................................... 27 Figure 14: Average daily AB 109 population – Martinez Detention Facility .............................................. 28 Figure 15: Average daily AB 109 population – West County Detention Facility ........................................ 28 Figure 16: Average daily AB 109 population – Marsh Creek Detention Facility ......................................... 29 Figure 17: Average custodial days served by AB 109 clients, by classification ........................................... 29 Figure 18: Jail to Community Program ........................................................................................................ 30 Figure 19: Newly processed AB 109 supervisees, by classification ........................................................... 30 Figure 20: Total AB 109 individuals under supervision .............................................................................. 31 Figure 21: Average AB 109 population under County supervision, by classification ................................. 31 Figure 22: Initial CAIS risk levels ................................................................................................................. 32 Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 6 Figure 23: AB 109 supervision population CAIS-assessed needs ............................................................... 32 Figure 24: DHS intake screenings for AB 109 inmates ............................................................................... 33 Figure 25: Types of DHS sick calls for AB 109 inmates ............................................................................... 34 Figure 26: Outpatient AODS Treatment Services ....................................................................................... 35 Figure 27: Residential AODS Treatment Services ...................................................................................... 35 Figure 28: Clients referred to, screened for, and received Forensic Mental Health services .................... 36 Figure 29: Medi-Cal intakes and approvals ................................................................................................ 37 Figure 30: Total bed-nights utilized by AB 109 population ........................................................................ 38 Figure 31: Individuals Served by Region across the County ...................................................................... 40 Figure 32: Distribution of Men and Women Served .................................................................................. 40 Figure 33: Criminal Justice Involvement .................................................................................................... 41 Figure 34: Housing Status at Service Intake with Community Based Organizations ................................. 41 Figure 35: Completed Goals by Domain .................................................................................................... 42 Figure 36: PRCS flash incarcerations .......................................................................................................... 49 Figure 37: Percentage and number of 1170(h) clients revoked ................................................................ 49 Figure 38: Percentage and number of PRCS clients revoked ..................................................................... 50 Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 7 Table of Tables Table 1: Budget Allocation for the District Attorney ................................................................................... 8 Table 2: Budget Allocation for the Public Defender .................................................................................. 20 Table 3: Budget Allocation for PTS ............................................................................................................ 22 Table 4: Budget Allocation for the Office of the Sheriff ............................................................................. 26 Table 5: Budget Allocation for Probation ................................................................................................... 30 Table 6: Budget Allocation for DHS ............................................................................................................. 33 Table 7: Funding Allocation for BHS ........................................................................................................... 34 Table 8: AB 109 GA, Cal-Fresh, and SSDI/SSI intakes and approvals ......................................................... 37 Table 9: Budget Allocation for the WDB .................................................................................................... 38 Table 10: Community-based service referrals, enrollments, and completions ......................................... 43 Table 11: Budget Allocation for Public Safety Officers by City .................................................................. 47 Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 8 Glossary of Terms AB 109: Assembly Bill 109 ACER: Arraignment Court Early Representation ACES: Accelerating Careers through Essential Skills AODS: Alcohol and Other Drugs Services BALA: Bay Area Legal Aid BHS: Behavioral Health Services BJA: Bureau of Justice Assistance BOS: Board of Supervisors CAIS: Correctional Assessment and Intervention System CAO: County Administrator’s Office CBO: Community-based Organization CCEB: Catholic Charities of the East Bay CCP: Community Corrections Partnership CDCR: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation CFRP: Community and Family Reunification Program CHD: Center for Human Development CoCo Lead+: Contra Costa Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion Plus CSAC: California State Association of Counties DA: District Attorney DHS: Detention Health Services DOJ: Department of Justice (California) DPO: Deputy Probation Officer EBP: Evidence Based Practice FAST: Foundations in Automotive Services Training (FAST) Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 9 FTA: Failure to Appear FY: Fiscal Year GA: General Assistance Goodwill: Goodwill Industries of the Greater East Bay HRS: Housing Resource Specialist JAG: Justice Assistance Grant MDF: Martinez Detention Facility MCDF: Marsh Creek Detention Facility MHET: Mental Health Evaluation Team MWP: Men and Women of Purpose OR: Own recognizance ORJ: Office of Reentry & Justice PD: Public Defender PRCS: Post-Release Community Supervision PSR: Public Safety Realignment PTS: Pre-trial Services RDA: Resource Development Associates REACH: Reach Fellowship International RFP: Request for Proposals RJTF: Racial Justice Task Force SLE: Sober Living Environment SOARS: Sustainable Occupational Advancement and Reentry Success SSDI/SSI: Social Security Disability Income/Supplemental Security Income START: Service Technician and Auto Repair Training TAY: Transition aged youth TIC: Trauma-informed care Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 10 WCDF: West County Detention Facility WDB: Workforce Development Board YJI: Youth Justice Initiative Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 11 Executive Summary This report provides an overview of AB 109-funded activities and services provided in Contra Costa County during the fiscal year 2018/19 (“FY 18/19”) and concludes with priorities for FY 19/20. The County’s 5-year Reentry Strategic Plan (2018-2023), updated in FY 17/18, serves as the County’s guiding document for reentry programs and services, including but not limited to, AB 109-funded services. The County draws on the Plan to engage stakeholders to define priority areas, goals, and strategies that can help address gaps and needs of the local reentry system. One priority need area of particular importance surrounds the effective use and coordination of data for on-going program evaluation and continuous quality improvement. In an effort to enhance the use and coordination of data to inform decision-making, the ORJ hired a Research and Evaluation Manager (REM) during the FY 18/19. With the addition of the REM to ORJ, other efforts specifically focused on data access, collection, integration, management and security have advanced. These efforts include the development of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Probation and the ORJ to support the data sharing and analysis among the two agencies. In addition, in collaboration with the Probation Department, the ORJ submitted an application to the California Department of Justice (DOJ) to obtain statewide criminal justice data for individuals under the supervision of the County’s Probation Department. The DOJ data will help to provide a more complete picture of recidivism and is expected to be available during FY 19/20. Since its inception, the ORJ has been working closely with contracted AB 109 community-based providers in order to improve their ability to benefit from access to high quality data related to service provision and client goals. The ORJ has made investments into the SAFE database used by these providers to improve the user experience and quality of the data entered. Further, regular trainings for staff and ongoing feedback on data entry from the REM have both also helped to improve the quality and consistency of the data entered into the system. In addition, these efforts surrounding data quality are critical as other efforts seek to integrate SAFE data with criminal justice data in order to account for service provision and thus improve assessment of criminal justice and community outcomes. To supplement its data analysis capacity, the ORJ initiated a 12-week, part-time summer student internship program in FY 18/19. The goal of the program is to support the priority efforts of the ORJ while simultaneously providing a practical, applied experience to a student in higher education. By all accounts, the internship was successful, and the ORJ expects to continue this program in FY 19/20. The Requests for Proposals (“RFP”) procurement process to identify vendors to provide reentry services to residents returning to local communities is a focus of work for the ORJ. This process in FY 18/19 resulted in new or continuing contracts with community-based organizations (“CBOs”) for a 3-year term beginning July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. Other notable accomplishments in FY 18/19 include the conclusion of the Pre-Release Planning Pilot project which ended in May 2019. Overall, the results from the pilot point to a promising program Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 12 particularly as it relates to engagement in community-based post-release services. Engagement in post- release services was found to be positively associated with employment. Given that employment is a critical factor in reentry success, this was a particularly notable finding. Given the positive results of the pilot program, the County Office of Education has assumed the responsibility for the program which has been branded “Game Plan for Success (GPS). The Youth Justice Initiative (“YJI”), a multi-year project funded by the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (“JAG”) was also completed in FY 18/19. This pilot provided integrated prevention and intervention activities at key points along the spectrum from school to detention and reentry and applied innovative practices with an aim to shift culture and staff interaction with youth. The pilot was found to effectively shift school culture, thereby reducing suspensions and truancy rates, and support from a point person who assisted with reentry needs and problems was found to be invaluable to youths’ successful transition. CeaseFire hosted a retreat this fiscal year that served to reinvigorate and further enhance community partnerships. A guest speaker from the National Institute of Criminal Justice Reform outlined a framework for the establishment of criteria necessary to classify individuals at high risk. As a result, the program was situated to develop a list of high-risk individuals for on-going contact. The Public Defender’s Office expanded its successful Early Representation (EarlyRep) pilot program to all three regions of the County in FY 18/19 with the Central County Program launched in September 2019 through a partnership with the California Highway Patrol. The program reached about 2,500 participants through its first two and a half years of operation reducing the rate of failures to appear for court from 57% to 17%. The success of the EarlyRep program launched the development of the “Holistic Intervention Partnership” (“HIP”), a public-private partnership between the Contra Costa County Office of the Public Defender, multiple County agencies, and community-based partners. Funded by the JAG, HIP seeks to provide interdisciplinary case management and navigation services to indigent individuals to ensure timely and coordinated access to a client-centered array of housing, behavioral health, transportation and legal services at the critical time of initial law enforcement contact. The Board of Supervisors’ (BOS) 17-member Racial Justice Task Force (“RJTF”) completed its Final Report in June 2018 and submitted it to the Board of Supervisors for adoption in July 2018. The Task Force was commissioned with identifying racial disparities in the local justice system and providing the Board of Supervisors with a set of recommendations on how these disparities might be addressed and reduced. Implementation of the adopted recommendations is expected to begin in FY 19/20 through the Board’s newly created Racial Justice Oversight Body (“RJOB”). Assembled by ORJ staff, the County’s first Draft Racial Equity Action Plan (REAP) was developed in FY 18/19 by County employees participating in the Government Alliance on Race and Equity (GARE) in 2016, 2017 and 2018. The draft REAP is offered as a framework to continue to advance the development and maintenance of the necessary County infrastructure, policy and resources to ensure racial equity and immigrant inclusion. After a comprehensive community engagement process planned in FY 19/20, the Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 13 Board of Supervisors is expected to adopt the REAP in 2021. ORJ staff will support the community engagement process, as needed, and is in the process of identifying resources to translate the draft REAP into multiple languages for greater language accessibility. Led and coordinated by ORJ, Fogbreak Justice conducted a training and assessment program designed to promote the accessibility, fairness and effectiveness of government by teaching the concept and practices of procedural justice and implicit bias to County and community partners. This training program was well received by its participants. Therefore, ORJ plans to continue this program in FY 19/20 to provide a procedural justice and implicit bias workshop and an advanced racial equity training to the RJOB and other County and community partners. In FY 18/19, the Behavioral Health Division of Health Services was awarded with Proposition 47 state funding to initiate a Forensic Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) program in FY 19/20 to provide pretrial diversion services to individuals with serious and persistent mental illness. FACT will also leverage funding from AB 1810 and utilize restorative justice principles in the provision of mental health, substance use, housing, vocational, and trauma treatment services. The District Attorney’s Office secured a $1 million Board of State and Community Corrections (BSCC) Youth Reinvestment Grant in FY 18/19 to start a pilot juvenile diversion program in FY 19/20. Recognizing persistent racial and ethnic disparities in youth contact with the juvenile and criminal justice systems, the District Attorney will partner with RYSE to create the County’s first pre-charge diversion program and use restorative justice alternatives to reduce justice related costs, enhance victim satisfaction and reduce recidivism. In April 2019, funded by the County’s FY 18/19 Local Innovation Fund, ORJ partnered with Jeweld Legacy Group (JLG), HealthRIGHT 360 and the Reentry Success Center, to produce a capacity building symposium for participating community-based reentry service providers throughout the County. In all, 29 individuals attended the symposium including 16 participants from CBOs and the remaining 13 participants representing government agencies. Based on the evaluations survey completed, the majority of participants indicated a high level of satisfaction with the symposium and acknowledged increase in new skills, knowledge and resources. The JLG is expected to provide two more symposiums or sharing learning events in FY 19/20 and FY 20/21 with one related to successful reentry for young people up to age 25, and a second focused on characteristics of effective reentry and diversion programming. In June 2019, in partnership with Jeweld Legacy Group and George Mason University, Center for Advancing Correctional Excellence (ACE!), ORJ provided a workshop on Risk, Needs and Responsivity (RNR) Principles and Practices. This workshop was provided in response to a level of interest in the RNR model and the County’s investment in integrating these principles into its reentry practices. Two more RNR model related workshops will be conducted in FY 19/20 to complete the program assessment and the system assessment phases of the project for the County. Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 14 Introduction This report provides an overview of AB 109-related activities and services provided in Contra Costa County during FY 18/19. As context, the report begins with a historical overview and the legislative impact of AB 109 on California counties, followed by a discussion of Contra Costa County’s response to Public Safety Realignment. An in-depth look at the AB 109-related supervision and services provided by each of the County’s AB 109-funded departments, as well as the cross-departmental Pre-trial Services program, is presented. The County departments, divisions, and programs included in this report, listed in alphabetical order, are: • Behavioral Health Services • Detention Health Services • District Attorney’s Office • Office of the Public Defender • Pre-trial Services • Probation Department • Office of the Sheriff • Workforce Development Board After summarizing the implementation and impact of AB 109 across County departments, the report describes services each of the AB 109-contracted community-based organizations provides, highlighting the referrals they received from Probation and other CBOs, as well as the total number of enrollments and successful completions of program services over the course of the year. Finally, the report concludes with an overview of AB 109 population outcomes and a discussion of the County’s reentry priorities for FY 19/20. A Note on Data The Office of Reentry & Justice worked with each County department and nine contracted community- based organizations to obtain the data necessary for this report. As data were collected across a variety of organizations with different tracking systems, we caution against making direct comparisons of figures across the sections of this report. Some County partners were unable to provide data that was previously available in earlier fiscal years. Data that is not available this year is noted within the report along with a reason why the data is not available. Worth noting is that the ORJ continues to work with all participating agencies and community-based organizations to improve the reporting process and better ensure data validity. Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 15 Realignment & Reentry in Contra Costa County Historical Overview of AB 109 & Legislative Impacts Largely a response to prison overcrowding in California, the Public Safety Realignment Act (Assembly Bill 109 [“AB 109”]) was signed into law in 2011 and took effect on October 1, 2011. AB 109 transferred the responsibility of supervising individuals convicted of specific lower-level felonies, and detention for parole violations, from the state’s California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) to counties, realigning three major areas of the criminal justice system. Specifically, AB 109: ❖ Transferred the location of incarceration for those convicted of lower-level felonies (specified non-violent, non-serious, non-sex offenders) from state prison to local county jails and provided for an expanded role for post-release supervision for this population; ❖ Transferred the responsibility for post-release supervision of individuals released from prison after serving a sentence for a specified non-violent, non-serious, and non-sex offense from the state to the county by creating a new category of supervision called Post-Release Community Supervision (“PRCS”); ❖ Shifted the responsibility for processing certain parole revocations from the state Parole Board to the Superior Court; ❖ Shifted the responsibility for housing individuals after a parole revocation described above from CDCR to county detention facilities. The County is now responsible for the housing and/or supervision of three new populations, all classified under AB 109. These populations include: ❖ Post-Release Community Supervisees: Individuals discharging from prison whose commitment offense was non-sexual, non-violent and non-serious. ❖ Parole Violators: Excluding those serving life terms – individuals who violate the terms of their parole will serve any detention sanction in the local jail rather than state prison. In addition, effective July 1, 2013 local courts are responsible for parole revocation hearings for parolees who violate the terms of their parole, rather than the state Parole Board. ❖ 1170(h) Sentenced defendants: Individuals convicted of non-violent or non-serious felonies serve their sentence under the jurisdiction of the county instead of state prison. Sentences are served Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 16 either in county jail, on a term of “Mandatory Supervision” by the probation department, or on a split sentence (where part of the term is served in jail and part as Mandatory Supervision). In addition to transferring certain housing and supervision responsibilities to the County, AB 109 also enables the County to use AB 109 funding towards the development of alternative interventions through partnerships with local health and social service agencies and community-based organizations. The County has leveraged these partnerships to provide supportive services that facilitate the successful reentry and reintegration of individuals into the community and reduce their likelihood of being involved in future criminal activity. Public Safety Realignment in Contra Costa County After the enactment of AB 109, the Executive Committee of Contra Costa County’s Community Corrections Partnership (“CCP”) developed an AB 109 Public Safety Realignment Implementation Plan approved by the County’s Board of Supervisors. During the first two years of PSR, the County examined the impacts of AB 109 across departments and drew on the resulting data to inform decision-making surrounding how to best prepare for housing and supervision of the AB 109 population. During this time, the County also created an AB 109 Operational Plan and worked towards developing a coordinated reentry infrastructure, emphasizing the use of evidence-based practices (“EBPs”) for serving the AB 109 reentry population. The overarching approach to AB 109 implementation has largely centered on the development of formalized partnerships between different law enforcement agencies, as well as partnerships between law enforcement agencies and health or social service agencies, such as Behavioral Health Services (“BHS”) and AB 109-contracted community-based organizations. For instance, the Sheriff’s Department and Probation have increased coordination with each other so that Deputy Probation Officers (“DPOs”) have greater access to County jails than they did prior to AB 109. In addition, Probation has increased communication and collaboration with BHS and AB 109-contracted CBOs. This cooperative effort has resulted in a greater number of referrals to supportive reentry services established to facilitate a person’s successful reintegration into the community. In recent years, the following service programs have been developed: ❖ In FY 13/14, the Pre-trial Services Program was developed as an evidence-based collaborative between the Office of the Public Defender, Probation, the Sheriff’s Department, and the District Attorney’s Office to reduce the use of money bail and the number of individuals held in jail prior to trial. ❖ During the FY 14/15, the West County Reentry Success Center, a one-stop center where the reentry population can connect with a diverse array of reentry support providers, was opened. ❖ In addition, the Network Reentry System was launched in FY 15/16. The Network uses mobile Coordinators to connect the reentry population, especially those in East and Central County, with County services and AB 109-contracted service providers. Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 17 ❖ During FY 16/17, the Office of Reentry and Justice was established as a 2.5 year pilot of the County Administrator’s Office to align and advance the County’s public safety realignment, reentry, and justice programs and initiatives. ❖ In FY 16/17, a Pre-release Planning Pilot Program was developed to improve the transition of individuals from incarceration to services and programs that aid in their successful reentry into the community once they are released from custody. This is accomplished by screening for and assessing a person’s needs, developing an individualized transition plan related to the identified needs, and providing the person with support as they implement their plan. ❖ Stand Together Contra Costa was launched as a pilot project on January 1, 2018 and is managed by the Office of the Public Defender in partnership with nonprofit organizations and community members. The project seeks to ensure that all people in Contra Costa County, regardless of citizenship or immigration status, are afforded the rights established by the United States Constitution and are protected from actions or policies that result in disparate, discriminatory, or unlawful treatment. The backbone of Stand Together Contra Costa is a Rapid Response Hotline, which is staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide a single point of contact for people who witness or are targeted by federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions undertaken in the County. The pilot phase of the initiative is scheduled through June 30, 2020. ❖ Launched in FY 17/18, the County’s Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion Plus (“CoCo LEAD+”) project is led by the Health Services Department and funded through a Proposition 47 grant to the County’s Health Services Department. In collaboration with HealthRIGHT 360 and the Antioch Police Department, the program’s objective is to divert individuals with behavioral health needs and multiple recent low-level arrests from the justice system into an array of supportive programs. These programs include cognitive based teaching, restorative programs, employment and housing assistance. ❖ The Smart Reentry Pilot was also launched in FY 17/18. This pilot was developed to address the particular needs of transition aged youth (TAY). Drawing on a Bureau of Justice Assistance (“BJA”) funded grant, the collaborative pilot seeks to serve 100 moderate to high risk TAY who reside in East County after a period of incarceration. TAY who are or at high risk of homelessness are a priority for this project. ❖ Central-East CeaseFire, hosted a retreat that was open to the public during the FY. Approximately 40 people attended including those from law enforcement, faith leaders, community members and service provider partners. The retreat served to reinvigorate and further enhance community partnerships. In addition, a guest speaker from the National Institute of Criminal Justice Reform, a national organization with vast CeaseFire experience, provided a framework for the establishment of criteria necessary to classify individuals at high risk. As a result, the program has developed a list of high-risk individuals for on-going contact. In addition, the retreat provided an opportunity to recruit new working group members from the community. Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 18 County Department Impacts Public Safety Realignment required that the County use AB 109 funding towards building partnerships between County departments to provide coordinated and evidence-based supervision of, and services for, the AB 109 reentry population. In Contra Costa County, through partnerships with local health and social service agencies, individuals supervised by the Probation Department as part of PSR are provided with access to supportive services that help facilitate their reentry and reintegration into the community when released from custody. Organized in the order a typical case would move through the justice system, the sections below summarize how AB 109 has impacted County Departments by highlighting the volume and types of AB 109 related services provided to the residents across the included County agencies. District Attorney’s Office Table 1: Budget Allocation for the DA DA Program Expenditure FY 2018-19 Salaries & Benefits: Victim Witness Program 87,881 Salaries & Benefits: Arraignment Program 682,494 Salaries & Benefits: Reentry/DV Program 792,950 Salaries & Benefits: ACER Clerk 72,372 Salaries & Benefits: Gen'l Clerk 60,399 Operating Costs 92,638 Total 1,788,734 The District Attorney’s Office (“DA”) functions to protect the community by prosecuting crimes and recommending sentences intended to increase public safety. The program expenditures above reflect an approximate 7 percent increase over the previous fiscal year. The DA can initiate supervision revocations for probation and parole violations. Figure 1 presents the number of AB 109 supervision revocations by AB 109 classification and quarter. Over the course of FY 18/19 there were a total of 564 revocations. While there is some variation by quarter, the number of revocations by AB 109 classification are somewhat consistent over time with the highest number of PRCS revocations occurring in the 4th quarter of the fiscal year. Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 19 Figure 1: Types of AB 109 supervision revocations As presented below, the majority of revocations (n=286, 40%) were among the PRCS population followed by parole revocations (n=237, 34%) and 1170(h) revocations (n=181, 26%). Figure 2: Types of supervision revocations as a percentage of all AB 109 revocations Sentencing data The number and percentage of AB 109 sentences as a percentage of all felony sentences, the number of split sentences with new charges filed against, and the number of AB 109 individuals who were convicted of a new criminal offense during FY 2018/19 are not available this fiscal year. The Court staff are transitioning to a new case management information system and have indicated they do not have the capacity to provide the necessary data required for this year’s report. 59 56 34 32 62 74 68 82 61 73 52 51 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 0 50 100 150 200 250 # of AB 109 revocationsParole PRCS 1170(h) 1170(h) 26% PRCS 40% Parole 34% Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 20 Office of the Public Defender Table 2: Budget Allocation for the PD PD Program Expenditure FY 2018-19 Salaries & Benefits: Clean Slate/Client Support 413,160 Salaries & Benefits: ACER Program 907,698 Salaries & Benefits: Reentry Coordinator 340,827 Salaries & Benefits: Failure to Appear (FTA) Program 354,912 Stand Together CoCo 500,000 Total 2,516,597 The main role of the Public Defender (“PD”) within AB 109 implementation is to provide legal representation, assistance, and services for indigent persons accused of crimes in the County. Before the adjudication process begins, the County’s AB 109 funds enable the Office of the Public Defender to provide legal assistant and attorney staffing for the Arraignment Court Early Representation (“ACER”) and legal assistant staffing for the Pre-trial Services (“PTS”) programs. Both the ACER and PTS programs are designed to reduce the County’s custodial populations; by ensuring the presence of attorneys at defendants’ initial court appearances, ACER is intended to increase the likelihood that appropriate defendants will be released on their own recognizance (“OR”) for the duration of the court process and allow for the expedited resolution of cases. PTS supports reduced Pre-trial detention by providing judges with greater information with which to make bail and Pre-trial release decisions, and by providing Pre- trial monitoring of individuals who are deemed appropriate for release. The Office also provides a suite of post-conviction Clean Slate services including a Clean Slate attorney and advocates who will file petitions requesting various forms of record clearance relief including expungement, reduction of felonies to misdemeanors, certificates of rehabilitation, motions for early termination from supervision, and arrest record sealing. With the addition of two additional staff for the current fiscal year, the County’s AB 109 funds now support three social workers in the Office of the Public Defender who provide social service assessments, referrals for clients needing additional supports, and prepare social history reports for court consideration in sentencing and case negotiations. The program expenditures above reflect an approximate 18 percent increase over the FY 17/18 budget. As presented in Figure 3, during FY 2018/19, 97 percent of defendants who were assessed for social service needs were referred to community-based services (n=142) intended to help address identified needs. Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 21 Figure 3: Number of individuals served by Public Defender Social Workers The ACER collaboration between the Office of the Public Defender and the District Attorney’s Office has resulted in thousands of defendants receiving representation at arraignment and appears to facilitate both pre-trial releases and early case resolution. As Figure 4 shows, more than 4,000 defendants were represented at arraignment though the ACER program. During the year, 1560 defendants were released on their own recognizance at arraignment. Figure 4: Number of clients released on OR and ACER dispositions A smaller but still sizeable percentage of criminal cases were also disposed of through ACER. Throughout the year, 288 cases resolved at arraignment, comprising 7% of all cases handled by an ACER attorney. In addition to these services, the Office of the Public Defender dedicated significant effort to Clean State services. As Figure 5 shows, the Office of the Public Defender filed 4412 Clean Slate petitions throughout the year. During this time, 3559 Clean Slate petitions were granted. This represents a granted rate of 81% overall. It is important to recognize that each individual may have more than 1 petition. At this time, the average number of petitions per individual is not collected. However, this is a data point that is worthy of future attention. 147 147 142 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 Referred to Social Worker Assessed by Social Worker Referred to community services# of individuals4327 1560 288 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 Defendants represented at arraignment ACER defendants released on OR ACER dispositions# of individuals Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 22 Figure 5: Clean Slate petitions filed and granted Stand Together Contra Costa A public-private initiative managed by the Office of the Public Defender in partnership with nonprofit organizations and community members, Stand Together Contra Costa's pilot phase began in January 1, 2018 and runs through June 30, 2020. The mission of Stand Together Contra Costa is to ensure that all people in Contra Costa County, regardless of citizenship or immigration status, are afforded the rights established by the United States Constitution and are protected from actions or policies that result in disparate, discriminatory, or unlawful treatment. The project provides no-cost rapid-response support, civil deportation defense legal services and clinics, immigrant rights education and training, and direct - service support for immigrant individuals and families in Contra Costa County. Catholic Charities of the East Bay (“CCEB”) serves as the project’s primary community-based partner and as lead of a coalition of seven nonprofit agencies including: CCEB, Bay Area Community Resources, Centro Legal, International Institute of the Bay Area, Jewish Family & Community Services, Oakland Community Organizations, and Monument Impact. The backbone of this initiative is the Rapid Response Hotline, which is staffed 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide a single point of contact for people who witness or are targeted by federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) actions undertaken in our community. Stand Together Contra Costa is a testament to the power of dedication, partnership, and inclusion, embodied in the project’s Steering Committee of representative leaders who volunteer their time to support this work. The Stand Together CoCo program expenditures above reflect an approximate 13 percent decrease over the FY 17/18 budget. Pre-trial Services Table 3: Budget Allocation for PTS PTS Program Expenditure FY 2018-19 Salaries & Benefits: Probation 784,296 Salaries & Benefits: Public Defender 295,788 Operating Costs 80,872 Total 1,160,956 4412 3559 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 # of petitionsPetitions filed Petitions granted Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 23 PTS is a collaboration between the Office of the Public Defender, the District Attorney, Probation, Office of the Sheriff and the Court aimed at reducing the Pre-trial custodial population through the use of evidence-based alternatives to money bail. The program budget above reflects an approximate 14 percent increase over FY 17/18. All eligible individuals scheduled for arraignment are screened by legal assistants from the Public Defenders office. Qualifying clients are then assessed for risk utilizing a validated assessment tool. In general, there are five categories of risk: low, below average, average, above average, and high. The number of PTS clients assessed for risk and their resulting risk level by quarter are shown in Figure 6 below. Over the course of the year, the number of clients assessed increased from 204 in Q1-Q2 to 251 in Q3-Q4, or 23%. The percentage of PTS clients assessed across risk levels was relatively consistent over the course of the year, with the exception of the above average and low risk groups. The percentage of PTS clients assessed as above average risk increased from 36% to 44% while the percentage of PTS clients assessed as low risk decreased from 6% to 1%. This trend speaks to a population of PTS clients that is at slightly higher risk at the end of the fiscal year compared to the beginning of the fiscal year. Figure 7 below displays the count of individuals under pre-trial monitoring by quarter along with the count of completions. As shown, and consistent with FY 17/18, the number of clients being monitored continues to grow over time. In Q4 FY 17/18, there were 264 clients being monitored. By Q4 FY 18/19, the number of clients under pre-trial monitoring increased 89%, to 499. While the number of clients monitored by the program throughout the year increased substantially, the rate of completions is consistent over time. These trends indicate on-going growth in the programmatic caseload. 29 37 74 111 52 58 37 42 12 3 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Q1-Q2 Q3-Q4 Figure 6: PTS clients assessed for Pre-trial risk # High #Above Average # Average # Below Average # Low Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 24 Figure 7: PTS clients monitored and completed Figure 8 displays the distribution of PTS clients assessed and starting pre-trial by risk level. As shown, the plurality of clients scored above average or high risk during the year. Here, 685 clients were assessed at above average or high risk compared to the 388 clients who were assessed at average or below risk. Figure 8: Count of PTS clients assessed and starting Pre-trial monitoring by Risk Level Figure 9 presents the percentage of assessed PTS clients who were released by the Court and went on to pre-trial monitoring, by risk group. Here, we can see that approximately 60% of individuals assessed as below average risk and almost 46% of those assessed as low risk went on to pre-trial monitoring. This rate of pre-trial monitoring for below average and low risk groups is substantially higher than what we 379 499 85 131100 102 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Q1-Q2 Q3-Q4 # clients monitored # successful completions # unsuccessful completions 271 414 209 146 33 66 187 111 88 15 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 # High #Above Average # Average # Below Average # Low # assessed # starting pre-trial Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 25 saw in Q’s 3 and 4 of FY 17/18. In the last 2 quarters of FY 17/18, following the Humphrey decision1, approximately 16% and 17% of individuals assessed as below average to low risk, respectively, started pre-trial monitoring. Over the current FY 2018/19, we have seen an approximate three-fold increase in Court releases among these risk groups. A similar and substantial trend is also seen over time among individuals who were assessed at average to high risk. Figure 9: Percentage of assessed clients starting Pre-trial monitoring, by risk level As Figure 10 shows, among all individuals under pre-trial monitoring whose case closed during FY 2018/19, on average, the majority (53%) successfully closed their cases. Here, a successful case closure indicates that clients appeared at their court dates and were not charged with any new offense while going through the court process. The percentage of successful case closures by quarter were 48% in Q1-Q2 and 57% in Q3-Q4. Figure 10: Pre-trial monitoring case closures Despite overall success of PTS clients, almost half of clients (47%) did not successfully complete the program during the FY. As Figure 11 shows, this is most commonly due to a client’s failure to appear at his/her court date. On average, 52% (n=105) of unsuccessful pre-trial case closures were due to a failure 1 In January 2018, at the start of Q3, FY 17/18, the Humphrey decision was released and clarified the requirement for bail to be affordable and not fashioned to ensure detention. This decision likely accounts for a high proportion of the growth in individuals who started PTS between Q2 and Q3, FY 17/18. Although the Humphrey decision clarified the requirement for bail to be affordable and not fashioned to ensure detention, it likely accounted for the growth in individuals who started PTS in Q3 FY 17/18 (January 2018). 24.4 45.2 53.1 60.3 45.5 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 # High #Above Average # Average # Below Average # LowPercentage 92 97 85 131 0 50 100 150 200 250 Q1-Q2 Q3-Q4# of PTS Closures# Unsuccessful # Successful Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 26 to appear at court. In addition, on average, 30% of unsuccessful case closures were accounted for by new arrests and 14% by technical violations. CAF rejections are not considered as unsuccessful completions. Figure 11: Unsuccessful Pre-trial monitoring case closures, by type Office of the Sheriff Table 4: Budget Allocation for the Office of the Sheriff Sheriff Program Expenditure FY 2018-19 Salaries & Benefits 7,013,256 Inmate Food, Clothing, Household Expenses 456,250 Monitoring Costs 55,000 IT Support 40,000 Behavioral Health Operating Costs 80,500 “Jail to Community” Program 243,650 Inmate Program Services 755,000 Total 8,643,656 The primary role in AB 109 implementation of the Office of the Sheriff is to provide safe and secure housing for all incarcerated individuals, including AB 109 individuals. The Office of the Sheriff operates the County’s three detention facilities – Marsh Creek Detention Facility (“MCDF”), West County Detention Facility (“WCDF”), and Martinez Detention Facility (“MDF”), plus the Custody Alternative Facility (“CAF”) which offers electronic home detention. The budget expenditures above reflect a 5 percent increase over FY 17/18. The MCDF is generally considered a minimum security facility and houses incarcerated individuals who have been convicted of lesser crime classifications and have already been sentenced. The facility houses an average incarcerated population of 62, with a maximum of 188. Frequently referred to as “the farm” because of its rural location, the MCDF encompasses approximately 32 acres of a land located at the base of Mt. Diablo. The WCDF, located in Richmond, is a direct supervision jail designed to operate as a co - educational, program-oriented facility. The facility houses up to 1,096 inmates within the confines of five separate housing units; four for males and one for females. The MDF is a maximum security facility and 54 51 30 27 8 19 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Q1-Q2 Q3-Q4 # Failure to appear # new offenses # technical violations Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 27 houses a diverse population of both pre-sentenced and sentenced inmates. Over the course of FY 2018/19, there were 1810 AB 109-related bookings or commitments into the County’s detention facilities. All AB 109 bookings take place at the Martinez Detention Facility, and Figure 12 shows the number of AB 109 bookings during each quarter of the year, with a breakdown by AB 109 classification. As this figure demonstrates, on average over the year, parole holds and commitments make up the vast majority (89%) of AB 109 bookings. While the number of parole holds and commitments increased from Q1 to Q2 by over 10%, overall, throughout the fiscal year the average was 310 per quarter. A similar pattern is seen with PRCS flash incarcerations. Between Q1 and Q2 a 64% increase in flash incarcerations is seen with the numbers returning to pre-Q2 levels in Q3 and Q4. Here, the average number of flash incarcerations is 15 per quarter. PC § 1170(h) commitments were relatively stable throughout the year. Figure 12: AB 109 bookings, by type Figure 13 presents the distribution of the average daily jail population across all three detention facilities for the fiscal year. Here, a small proportion of the average daily jail population is classified as AB 109 (6%) while the vast majority is accounted for by individuals who are not AB 109 (94 %)2. Figure 13: Average daily jail population 2 Worth noting is that an unknown but potentially large portion of the unsentenced jail population may AB 109. 302 353 301 284 25 23.3 21 22142313 11 0 100 200 300 400 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4# of AB 109 BookingsAB 109 Parole holds & commitments AB 109 prison/jail commitments (1170) PRCS flash incarcerations AB 109 6% Non AB109 94% Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 28 Figures 14 through Figure 16 present the average percentage of AB 109 individuals in each of the County’s detention facilities, as well as the number of AB 109 individuals in custody who are serving new 1170(h) sentences versus parole holds or commitments. On average, the MDF has an average daily AB 109 population that is 7% of the total population. Overall, parole holds and commitments are greater than 1170(h) commitments with an average of 72% parole holds and commitments compared to 28% for 1170(h) commitments throughout the fiscal year. Figure 14: Average daily AB 109 population – Martinez Detention Facility As presented in Figure 15, the WCDF, on average, houses an average daily AB 109 population that is 8% of the total population. Similar to the MDF, parole holds and commitments are generally more common than 1170(h) commitments. Here, 54% of the average daily AB 109 population is accounted for by parole holds and commitments compared to the 44% accounted for by 1170(h) commitments. Figure 15: Average daily AB 109 population – West County Detention Facility 37 31 29 26 16 13 9 10 8% 8% 7%7% 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 0 10 20 30 40 50 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Average daily populationParole holds & commitments 1170(h) commitments AB 109 % of total population 19 31 31 33 28 24 22 23 8% 9% 8% 9% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Average daily populationParole holds & commitments 1170(h) commitments AB 109 % of total population Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 29 Figure 16, below, presents a more varied average daily AB 109 population in the MCDF compared to the MDF or WCDF. Here, the MCDF houses an average daily AB 109 population that is 12.5%, over the course of the fiscal year. Further, there a few parole holds and commitments at the MCDF with the vast majority of the population accounted for by 1170(h) commitments. Figure 16: Average daily AB 109 population – Marsh Creek Detention Facility While individuals on parole make up a larger percentage of the AB 109 incarcerated population overall, because jail commitments for a parole violation are for no longer than six months, individuals serving sentences under 1170(h) spend much more time in custody than the parole population. This point is illustrated in Figure 17. Notably, despite the fact that AB 109 allows for much longer sentences in local custody than was previously possible, AB 109 individuals serve, on average, much less than a year in jail. As presented below, over the course of the year, 1170(h) individuals served an average of 155 custodial days or around 5 months in custody while individuals on parole averaged a little over two weeks in custody waiting to clear a parole hold and about a month and a half in jail for the violation of their parole conditions. Figure 17: Average custodial days served by AB 109 clients, by classification Average Custodial Days Served by AB 109 Clients, by Classification 1170(h) 155 Parole (sentenced) 42 Parole (holds & dropped) 16 The Sheriff’s Jail to Community Program is a partnership with Men & Women of Purpose and Reach Fellowship. The program operates out of all three detention facilities. Figure 18 below reflects the number of individuals, on average, who participated in weekly mentoring and support meetings at each of the detention facilities by quarter. It is worth noting that the number of participants who attended weekly meetings is limited by the size of the meeting rooms available at each facility. 0.3 2 2 2 5 10 6 4 9% 19% 12% 10% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Average dailypopulationParole holds & commitments 1170(h) commitments AB 109 % of total population Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 30 Figure 18: Jail to Community Program Probation Department Table 5: Budget Allocation for Probation Probation Program Expenditure FY 2018-19 Salaries & Benefits 2,695,085 Operating Costs 175,862 Total 2,870,947 The Probation Department’s primary role in AB 109 is to enhance public safety by supporting the successful reentry of AB 109 clients upon their release from custody and return to the community. In addition to providing the PRCS and Mandatory Supervision populations with community supervision services, AB 109 Deputy Probation Officers assess clients for criminogenic risk factors and general reentry needs, then refer interested clients to a range of supportive services. The Probation Department budget above reflects an increase of approximately 4 percent over the FY 17/18 budget. A total of 365 individuals were released onto AB 109 Supervision during FY 2018/19. Between these new supervision clients and continuing supervision clients, 1061 AB 109 clients were supervised by the County Probation Department during this same time period. As Figure 19 and 20 show, PRCS cases represent a higher proportion of both new clients and the overall AB 109 probation supervision population, in contrast to early State projections that estimated a reduction 173 129 142 151 16 12 17 19 28 29 16 22 8 8 7 8964 5 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4# of participants# enrolled # completed program requirements # men attended WCDF weekly meetings (on average); max = 40 # men attended MCDF weekly meetings (on average); max = 20 # men attended MDF weekly meetings (on average); max = 12 Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 31 in new PRCS cases overtime. As per the Governor’s proposed budget for the FY 18-19, this anticipated reduction in PRCS cases has not yet occurred due to court ordered measures and Propositio n 57. Figure 19 below presents the number of AB 109 clients that were newly released onto AB 109 supervision during the fiscal year. On average, PRCS supervisees represent 77% of the new supervisees while 1170(h) clients represent 23% of the total new cases for the department. Figure 19: Newly processed AB 109 supervisees, by classification Figure 20 below graphically presents the percentage of the total AB 109 population by classification. Here we see that 33% of the total population is under 1170(h) supervision while 67% is under PRCS supervision. Figure 20: Total AB 109 individuals under supervision Historically, PRCS clients have made up a higher proportion of the average daily number of AB 109 clients under County supervision. As presented in Figure 21 below, this fiscal year is consistent with the historical pattern where the average daily number of AB 109 PRCS clients is greater than the average daily number of 1170(h) clients. Figure 21: Average AB 109 population under County supervision, by classification 1170(h), 84, 23% PRCS, 281, 77% PRCS 710 67% 1170(h) 351 33% 265 245 219 199 441 453 453 458 0 100 200 300 400 500 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Average DailyPopulation1170(h) PRCS Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 32 To determine each AB 109 client’s appropriate level of supervision intensity upon entering County supervision, a DPO conducts an interview drawing on the evidence based Correctional Assessment and Intervention System (“CAIS”) risk assessment tool, to determine each client’s risk for recidivism and associated risk factors. Figure 22 indicates the distribution of recidivism risk for all AB 109 clients given an initial CAIS risk assessment during FY 2018/19. Here, among the 493 AB 109 clients that received an initial assessment, 66% were assessed as high risk while 30% and 4% received assessments of moderate and low risk, respectively. Figure 22: Initial CAIS risk levels The majority of AB 109 Probation clients were assessed to have a variety of overlapping needs that are associated with a risk for future involvement in criminal activities. As shown in Figure 23, the most common risk factors among AB 109 Probation clients is criminal orientation (71%) and alcohol and/or drug abuse (66%) followed by vocational skills (49%), emotional factors (37%), family history (34%), and social inadequacy and interpersonal manipulation (both at 27%). This pattern of needs is comparable to the needs assessed in FY 17/18. Figure 23: AB 109 supervision population initial CAIS-assessed needs High 393 66% Moderate 294 30% Low 236 4% 66% 71% 37% 27% 49% 34% 27% 7% 9% 6% 3% 2% 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80% Alcohol and/or Drug Abuse Criminal Orientation Emotional Factors Interpersonal Manipulation Vocational Skills Family History Social Inadequacy Relationships Isolated Situational Basic Needs Abuse/Neglect and Trauma Physical Safety Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 33 Detention Health Services Table 6: Budget Allocation for DHS DHS Program Expenditure FY 2018-19 Salaries & Benefits, Fam Nurse, WCD/MCD 195,038 Salaries & Benefits, LVN, WCD 306,499 Salaries & Benefits: RN, MCD 513,764 Salaries & Benefits: MHCS, WCD/MCD 126,394 Total 1,141,696 Detention Health Services Department (“DHS”) provides health care to all incarcerated individuals – including AB 109 individuals – housed within the County. DHS provides in-custody access to nurses, doctors, dentists, mental health clinicians, and psychiatrists who provide medical and mental health care for all AB 109 individuals in custody. Further, basic health screenings to all new individuals in custody, including AB 109 individuals, are also provided. The DHS program expenditure above reflects a 4% increase over the FY 17/18 budget. Figure 24 displays the number of AB 109 individuals who were provided with health screenings at intake across each quarter of FY 18/19. A total of 1,261 individuals received intake screenings throughout the fiscal year. Figure 24: DHS intake screenings for AB 109 inmates In addition to these screenings, DHS provides an array of health-related services to all individuals incarcerated in the County’s detention facilities, including physical, behavioral, and dental care. Unfortunately, at this time, disaggregated data that speaks to the proportion of AB 109 inmates with mental health, physical or dental care conditions is not available. Figure 25 presents the distribution of sick calls (e.g., in-person appointments) provided for AB 109 individuals in FY 2018/19. Over the course of the year, 5,916 sick calls were provided to AB 109 inmates. While the majority of calls were calls to nursing (28%), the combination of calls for mental health nursing (9%), mental health clinician (26%) and psychiatry (11%) speak to the prevalence of mental health needs among the in-custody AB 109 population. Overall, 45% of calls were made to a mental health provider. 380 274 291 316 0 100 200 300 400 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Count of screenings Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 34 Figure 25: Types of DHS sick calls for AB 109 inmates Health Services Table 7: Funding Allocation for BHS BHS Program Expenditure FY 2018-19 Salaries & Benefits 1,036,027 Operating Costs 61,102 Contracts 1,343,772 Vehicle & Maintenance 23,346 Travel 10,608 Total 2,474,855 Behavioral Health Services The Behavioral Health Services (BHS) Division of Health Services combines Alcohol and Other Drugs Services (“AODS”), Forensic Mental Health Services, and Public Benefits into an integrated system of care. BHS works with clients, families, and community-based organizations to provide services to the AB 109 population. While BHS provided services for the reentry population prior to the start of AB 109, PSR resulted in an increased focus on and funding for services to this population. The overall health services program expenditure above reflects a 4% increase over the FY 17/18 budget. The sections below present the number of AB 109 individuals receiving services from each BHS service program over the course of the FY 18/19. 422 412 387 438 306 302 365 418 57 48 46 4113493155 247 352 374 368 432115126 120 158 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Number of AB 109 Inmate Sick CallsMental Health RN Mental Health Clinician Psychiatrist Dental MD Nursing Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 35 Alcohol and Other Drugs The AODS program of BHS operates a community-based continuum of substance abuse treatment services to meet the level of care needs for each AB 109 client referred. During FY 18/19, 337 AB 109 referrals were made for AODS treatment services. As shown in Figure 25, a total of 22 individuals received outpatient AODS services throughout the fiscal year. Of those, 45% successfully completed the AODS outpatient treatment. Figure 26: Outpatient AODS Treatment Services AODS also provides residential substance abuse treatment to clients on AB 109 supervision. As shown in Figure 26, AODS provided residential treatment services to 65 AB 109 clients. Of those receiving residential treatment services, 55% successfully completed the program. Figure 27: Residential AODS Treatment Services 14 8 7 3 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Q1-Q2 Q3-Q4 AB 109 Clients Receiving Services Successful Completions 25 40 14 22 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Q1-Q2 Q3-Q4County of ClientsAB 109 Clients Receiving Services Successful Completions Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 36 Mental Health Division Forensic Mental Health collaborates with Probation to support successful community reintegration of individuals with co-occurring mental health and substance related disorders. Services include assessment, groups and community case management. As indicated in Figure 28, Probation referred 212 clients to Forensic Mental Health services of whom 121 or 57% were AB 109 referrals. Of the clients referred to the Mental Health Division, 110 received mental health screenings and 36 or 33% engaged in mental health services. Figure 28: Clients referred to, screened for, and received Forensic Mental Health services Public Benefits BHS also assists AB 109 clients with applying for public benefits, including Medi-Cal, General Assistance, CalFresh, and Social Security Disability Income/Supplemental Security Income (“SSDI/SSI”). Medi-Cal provides medical, dental, and vision insurance to low-income individuals and their families while General Assistance (GA) provides temporary, short-term, employment focused cash grants to unemployed persons with no other means of support. GA also provides continued aid for disabled or unemployable persons while they apply for and secure SSI. The CalFresh program, formerly known as Food Stamps and federally known as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (“SNAP”), provides electronic funds for low-income individuals and families that can be used to buy most foods. Finally, SSDI/SSI are federal programs that provide cash assistance to persons with disabilities. SSDI is based on an individual’s work history and earnings record while SSI is based on financial need. Any of these public benefit programs may assist AB 109 clients returning to the community. Figure 29 displays the number of AB 109 clients assisted with applications for Medi-Cal in FY 18/19, and the number of applications approved by the State. Over the course of the year, 248 Medi-Cal intakes were completed and 189 approvals were received. This amounts to, on average, an approval rate of 76%. 99 58 51 23 113 63 59 13 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Total Probation Referrals AB 109 Referrals Screenings New AB 109 clients engagedCount of ClientsQ1-Q2 Q3-Q4 Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 37 Figure 29: Medi-Cal intakes and approvals Table 8 displays the number of AB 109 client applications and approvals for GA, Cal-Fresh, and SSDI/SSI public benefits. Little is known as to the number of AB 109 clients who have applied for and enrolled in General Assistance or Cal-Fresh programs as these programs cannot be initiated by BHS and require that the individual apply in person. However, over the course of the year, 18 applications for SSDI/SSI were filed with 14 approvals received. This amounts to an approval rate of 78%. Table 8: AB 109 GA, Cal-Fresh, and SSDI/SSI intakes and approvals Intakes Approvals GA 0 0 CalFresh 0 0 SSDI/SSI 18 14 Homeless Services In FY 2018/19, the County’s Homeless Program, provided by the Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division, served 50 AB 109 individuals. The total number of emergency shelter bed-nights utilized by the AB 109 population are shown below in Figure 30. Both the Brookside and Concord shelters provide shelter and case management services to assist residents with ending their homelessness. Further, both facilities operate 24 hour a day and have the capacity to serve over 160 men and women. Services include meals, laundry facilities, mail, and telephones. If involved in case management, residents may stay for up to 120 days. Overall, 2023 bed-nights were utilized throughout the county during the fiscal year, with 66% of bed nights provided by the Concord shelter and 34% at the Brookside shelter. 50 63 72 63 36 37 53 63 0 20 40 60 80 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Number of AB 109 ClientsIntakes Approvals Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 38 Figure 30: Total bed-nights utilized by AB 109 population Workforce Development Board Table 9: Budget Allocation for the WDB WDB Program Expenditure FY 2018-19 Salaries & Benefits 212,160 Travel 4,160 Total 216,320 The role of the Workforce Development Board (“WDB”) is to strengthen local workforce development efforts by bringing together leaders from public, private, and non-profit sectors to align a variety of resources and organizations to help meet the needs of businesses and job seekers. The budget allocation above reflects a 4 % increase over the FY 17/18 budget. To date, the WDB’s primary role in AB 109 implementation has been to broker opportunities for the AB 109 reentry population and to coordinate with AB 109 partners to ensure they are aware of and are able to effectively access services and resources available for the AB 109 reentry population. To that end, the WDB has hosted several Fair Chance Hiring Summits throughout the County and identified more than 350 employer partnerships that are appropriate for the AB 109 population; they have also conducted a number of on-site recruitments and career fairs that the AB 109 reentry clients, as well as other reentry individuals, have attended. The WDB was successful in leveraging their AB 109 allocation for a $400,000 AB2060 Supervised Population grant and served 51 reentrants over a 2-year period with this funding (2016-2018). The WDB has also received approximately $460,000 over 2 years (2019-2021) in Prison to Employment State funds and will be leveraging this project to further support their work with the AB 109 community. 269 426 682 646 0 200 400 600 800 Q1-Q2 Q3-Q4Count Bed nights, Brookside Bed nights, Concord Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 39 Community Based Service Providers Shared values/approach (EBPs, TIC approach, etc.) Contra Costa County’s reentry approach is centered on developing an integrated and supportive service network comprised of AB 109-contracted community-based organizations, public agencies and the broader community for the AB 109 reentry population to utilize. The network works together to help create a pathway for the successful reentry and reintegration of formerly incarcerated individuals back into the community. AB 109-contracted CBOs play a large role in the reentry infrastructure, providing a range of services from housing assistance and employment services to mentorship and family reunification. When working successfully, the County’s reentry services are part of a continuum that begins at the point an individual enters the justice system and continues through their successful reintegration. Drawing on the County’s 2018-2023 Reentry System Strategic Plan, County and community stakeholders agreed to the following set of guiding principles: ❖ Culturally Respectful and Responsive: Diverse perspectives that reflect the wide array of cultures, beliefs, and attitudes within our community should be reflected in the design and implementation of reentry system approaches. ❖ Evidence-Based: Better reentry outcomes require a commitment to employing evidence-based practices and continuous quality improvement, while also leaving room for innovative approaches that will produce promising results. ❖ Fairness and Equity: Procedural justice is important and must respect the dignity and experience of all justice-involved people, as well as demonstrate concern for communities experiencing criminal justice disparities that have been persistent and historical. ❖ Holistic: Community reintegration is most easily achieved by continuous, appropriate delivery of quality services that are tailored to the holistic needs of individuals and families most impacted by incarceration. ❖ Inclusive: Effective reentry strategies are best created through an inclusive approach that utilizes input from justice system professionals at all levels of government and in community and faith- based organizations, those with histories of justice system involvement, and other interested stakeholders to develop appropriate interventions that encourage community reintegration and recidivism reduction. ❖ Justice Reinvestment: Reinvesting in the communities most impacted by the criminal justice system supports public safety by addressing the root causes of crime and empowering communities. Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 40 ❖ Partnership: Collaboration, coordination, information and resource sharing, and communication are essential elements of productive partnerships and critical components of a high-functioning reentry system. ❖ Public Safety: Effective implementation of reentry solutions will reduce recidivism, ensure victims’ rights are protected, and ultimately result in an environment where all members of the community feel safe and secure. ❖ Rehabilitation, Restoration, and Healing: To create a safe and healthy community, rehabilitation, restoration, and healing must inform the decisions, policies, and practices of all stakeholders in a reentry system that is client-centered, trauma-informed, and culturally sensitive. While these principles have not been explicitly tied to AB 109, they nonetheless represent the primary values upon which much of the County’s AB 109 work has been built. Countywide Across the county, AB 109 contracted community-based organizations served 1,230 justice involved individuals during FY 18-19. As presented in Figures 31 and 32, individuals, primarily men, were served across all regions of the county with the greatest service utilization in West and East County. Figure 31: Individuals Served by Region across the County Figure 32: Distribution of Men and Women Served West, 521, 46% Central, 175, 16% East , 425, 38% West Central East Men , 982, 79% Women, 266, 21% Men Women Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 41 Almost half (46%) of the 1,230 justice involved individuals served were on AB 109 probation or felony probation. As shown in Figure 33 below, 21 percent of the population (n=258) were on AB 109 probation with the majority of individuals on felony probation (n=303, 25%). A smaller proportion of individuals (n=184, 15%) were released in the last 3 years; another 14% (n=169) were on informal court probation; 7 percent (n=82) were awaiting trial and 7 percent (n=87) were on parole. It is unclear how 9 percent of those served (n=117) were involved with the criminal justice system. The unmet need for housing, presented in Figure 34, continues to be a barrier for community reentrants with just over 10% of individuals reporting stable housing at service intake. Just over one-quarter of individuals identified as being outright homeless with an additional 11 percent at risk for homelessness. It is not clear why almost half of individuals did not report a housing status. However, it is likely that a large portion of this group is not stably housed. Figure 34: Housing Status at Service Intake with Community Based Organizations 258 303 184 82 169 23 87 7 113 4 21%25% 15% 7% 14% 2% 7% 1% 9% 0%0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 % of ClientsCount of ClientsFigure 33: Criminal Justice Involvement Count %n = 1230 159 135 327 608 13%11% 27% 49% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 Stably housed At risk for homelessness Homeless Unk % of individualsCount of individualscount %n = 1229 Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 42 Among those served, on average, individuals completed three goals each during the fiscal year. As expected, employment was the most common goal followed by mentoring and support, housing and finance. Notably, as shown in Figure 35, the count and percentage of completed housing and health related goals are low compared to goals in other domains. Here, 73% of employment related goals were successfully completed compared to 53% of housing related goals and 39% of health-related goals. This low level of housing related completions points to the on-going housing crisis in the County while both housing and health related goals are likely related to the amount of time it takes to obtain housing or reach a stable health related goal. It is worth noting that mentoring and support services are relatively high as mentoring services are available in custody compared to other service domains which are primarily provided in the community. Figure 35: Count of Goals by Domain, Percentage Successfully Completed Overview of AB 109 Community Partnerships The County established the Reentry Success Center in FY 14/15, presently staffed and managed in Richmond by Rubicon Programs, to serve as a collective impact backbone agency that provides individuals with a “one-stop” center and access to a variety of free, integrated, and effective County and community- based reentry services. During FY 15/16, the Reentry Network was launched, currently staffed and managed by HealthRIGHT 360, in East and Central County to coordinate support and access to services through “No Wrong Door” sites that are collectively aimed at helping returning residents reintegrate back into the community after periods of incarceration. In addition, through the pre-release planning pilot, developed to improve the transition of individuals from custody to community services, the County’s Office of Education makes referrals to post-release AB 109 contracted service providers including the Reentry Network, the Reentry Success Center and the diverse array of providers listed in Table 11 below, among others. These programs provide a gateway to community-based service provision for individuals returning to their community. 161 36 15 1493 51 407 233 425 104 1037 144 74% 89% 73% 73% 86% 71% 39%53% 86% 97% 63% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 % successfully completed Count of goals by domainCount %n=4106 Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 43 Table 10 describes the number of referrals each AB 109-contracted CBO received during FY 2018/19, as well as the total number of enrollments and successful service completions. AB 109-funded CBOs now provide services to any reentry clients in need of those services. In addition, given the diverse nature of the programs, the numbers reported should not be compared across organizations. It is worth noting that for some providers the total completions are greater than the total number of enrollments for the year. This is due to the duration of time it can take for some goals to be accomplished. For example, legal goals can take a good deal of time to complete and here, we see 37 new enrollments and 59 completions. Table 10: Community-based service referrals, enrollments, and completions Organization Total Referrals Total Enrollments Total Completions AB 109 Other AB 109 Other AB 109 Other Bay Area Legal Aid 100 -- 37 -- 59 -- Center for Human Development 15 38 5 12 2 9 Centerforce 79 -- 57 -- 4 -- Fast Eddie’s Auto Service 40 -- 28 -- 3 -- Goodwill Industries 79 160 64 121 32 60 Men and Women of Purpose 77 41 50 34 28 -- Mz. Shirliz 3 41 25 10 Rubicon 324 -- 202 -- 48 -- SHELTER Inc. 356 11 138 -- 39 -- Below are brief descriptions of the services that each of the AB 109-contracted CBO service providers offer the County’s population. Bay Area Legal Aid Budget Allocation for Bay Area Legal Aid $ 156,000 Bay Area Legal Aid (“BayLegal”) provides civil legal services for reentry clients through representation and empowerment with legal rights. BayLegal assists with the following legal issues, non-exclusively: housing access/retention, landlord/tenant disputes, housing discrimination, "clean slate" services, public benefits and health care access, employment discrimination and occupational licensing, consumer and criminal debt, and traffic court and DMV advocacy to restore driving privileges. Staff meet with clients before or after release from custody to assess legal needs, counsel and inform of legal rights and tailor a strategy for addressing barriers to housing and economic security. During the FY, BayLegal served 74 individuals. The most common types of matters were occupational licensing and housing. Fifty-nine (n=59) client cases were completed during the year. Most individuals (n=42) obtained the legal advice they were seeking. Additionally, 8 of 9 individuals received full representation and obtained favorable outcomes, 3 individuals overcame occupational licensing restrictions while 6 maintained their subsidized housing. Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 44 Center for Human Development Budget Allocation for the Center for Human Development $ 93,067 The Center for Human Development (“CHD”) operates the Community and Family Reunification Program (“CFRP”) for Contra Costa County’s AB 109 Community Programs’ Mentoring Program, providing reunification services to returning citizens, their families, and friends, in addition to providing community support throughout Contra Costa County. Services include large and small group pre-release presentations and workshops at West County Detention Facility and Marsh Creek Detention Facility. CHD also provides post-release large and small group presentations and workshops to returning citizens at partner agencies and other locations throughout the County. During the FY, the CHD enrolled 17 new participants into their family skills program. Eleven individuals (or 65%) successfully completed the program. Centerforce Budget Allocation for Centerforce $ 62,400 Centerforce provides culturally competent services for adult women transitioning from the County Jail to the East and Central regions of the County. The Women Empowered for Successful Transition (WEST) Program is staffed by women with advanced training in drug and alcohol counseling and draws on a team- based approach to provide case management focused on behavioral health, substance use disorders, family reunification, and empowerment. During the FY, Centerforce provided services to 57 women, 38 of whom were contacted in custody. Four individuals successfully completed at least 3 services. Fast Eddie’s Auto Services Budget Allocation for Fast Eddie’s Auto Services $ 67,600 Fast Eddie’s provides workforce development skills and automotive technical training for AB 109 individuals referred to the program. They have contracted with the County to provide employment support and employment placement opportunities for AB 109 clients. During the FY, Fast Eddie’s enrolled 28 individuals in their 12-stage automotive technical training. Three individuals completed all 12 training modules. Goodwill Industries Budget Allocation for Goodwill Industries $ 933,793 The Bridges to Work program of Goodwill Industries of the Greater East Bay (“Goodwill”) facilitates the County’s Employment Support and Placement Services to provide employment support and placement Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 45 services in Central County. Participants can engage in up to 90 days of transitional, paid employment at local Goodwill stores or other partner agencies, in addition to receiving job search assistance for competitive employment opportunities. Goodwill also serves as a service hub for other providers. During the FY, Goodwill served 185 individuals. Forty-eight percent (88) of individuals served successfully completed the program. Men and Women of Purpose Budget Allocation for Men and Women of Purpose $ 110,000 Men and Women of Purpose (“MWP”) provides employment and education liaison services for the County jail facilities, for which the program facilitates employment and education workshops every month at the County’s jails and works with Mentor/Navigators to assist the workshop participants with the documentation required to apply for employment, education, and other post-release activities. MWP also provides pre- and post-release mentoring services for West County using the organization’s evidence- based program Jail to Community model. The program provides one-on-one mentoring, as well as weekly mentoring groups that focus on employment and recovery. During the FY, MWP enrolled 84 individuals in their program. They provided post-release service assessments to 78 individuals and warm hand-offs from the WCDF to the RSC for 48 individuals returning to their community. Mz. Shirliz Budget Allocation for Mz. Shirliz $ 156,000 Mz. Shirliz Transitional provides sober living environment housing services and housing placement services to residents returning to the community from custody. A sober living environment means safe, clean, residential environments that promote individual recovery through positive peer group interactions among house residents and staff. Sober living housing is alcohol and drug-free and allows residents to continue to develop their individual recovery plans and to become self-supporting. The residential environment must co-exist in a respectful, lawful, and non-threatening manner with residential communities in the County. During the FY, 25 new residents were housed by Mz. Shirliz and 10 of the 49 active participants successfully transitioned to independent housing during the year. Rubicon Budget Allocation for Rubicon $ 1,492,940 Rubicon provides employment support and placement services, integrated with other supports, to AB 109 participants in East County and West County. Rubicon’s program includes pre-release engagement, job readiness workshops, educational and vocational training, transitional employment, individualized career Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 46 coaching, legal services, financial stability services, and domestic violence prevention and anger management. In order to provide a continuum of services, Rubicon partners with a number of other organizations through formal subcontracts, including vocational training partners, AB 109 providers, and other community-based organizations. During the fiscal year, Rubicon served over 300 individuals who returned to their communities. Given the breadth of Rubicon’s program, the counts of total referrals, enrollments and completions presented in Table 10 is not comparable to the other CBO programs. Here, the count of Rubicon referrals speaks to all individuals referred to Rubicon including those who are seeking not only specific employment services but also other services such as educational services or vocational training. As the primary objective of their program is employment, the Total Enrollments count found in Table 10 speaks to the number of individuals enrolled in their employment specific program, called Foundations Workshop, and thus excludes other program participants. Further, the Total Completions count refers to the number of individuals who have completed the program and obtained and retained competitive employment for a period of 12 months. As it relates to successful employment outcomes, it is worth noting that during the FY, there was a 98% completion rate for the Foundations Workshop. Further, of those who completed Foundations, 77% secured unsubsidized employment. The average hourly wage was $16.56 per hour and average hours per week was 37. In addition, among those who obtained employment following completion of Foundations, a 90% retention rate was found after 30 days of employment. Consistent with other reentry populations, the employment retention rate dropped to 63% after 90 days and to 53% after 6 months. SHELTER Inc. Budget Allocation for SHELTER, Inc. $ 1,016,855 SHELTER, Inc. operates the County’s AB 109 Short and Long-term Housing Access Program. This program assists incarcerated and formerly incarcerated persons who are referred to them under the AB 109 Community Programs to secure and maintain stabilized residential accommodations. SHELTER, Inc. provides a two-phased approach to clients seeking housing assistance. The first phase in the process is an option to move into a transitional housing that is provided through a Sober Living Environment (SLE). While placed in the SLE, individuals receive intensive case management to assist them as they work through barriers to housing. The second phase in the process is to work with a Housing Resource Specialist (HRS) that provides tenant education and housing leads. Participants receive financial assistance to help them in the process of obtaining permanent housing. They continue to receive case management to complete the 12 months provided as part of the program. During the FY, SHELTER, Inc. provided services to over 130 individuals. Fifty individuals were placed in SLE housing, 66 individuals received short term rental assistance and 39 individuals successfully completed the program and exited to permanent housing. Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 47 Public Safety Officers In certain areas of the County, Public Safety Officers are funded for participation in three specific AB 109 related activities. These activities include: the AB 109 Officers, Mental Health Evaluation Teams (MHET), and Central-East County Ceasefire. The budget allocation for these law enforcement activities in FY 18/19 is presented below in Table 11. Table 11: Funding Allocation for Public Safety Officers by City City Police Department FY 2018-19 Pittsburg Police 396,298 Ceasefire 114,000 AB 109 Officer 141,149 MHET 141,149 City of Richmond 282,298 AB 109 Officer 141,149 MHET 141,149 City of Antioch 141,149 AB 109 Officer 141,149 City of Concord 141,149 AB 109 Officer 141,149 Walnut Creek 141,149 MHET 141,149 Total 1,102,043 AB 109 Officers The AB 109 officers comprise a joint operation team that draws on a collaborative approach to the pursuit of public safety. Law enforcement efforts are directed primarily toward the supervised AB 109 population at medium to high risk of recidivism and include primary residence confirmations, probation compliance checks, multi-jurisdiction compliance checks, surveillance, and criminal investigations. These activities currently operate in the cities of Pittsburg, Richmond, Antioch, and Concord. Mental Health Evaluation Teams Mental Health Evaluation Teams (MHET), comprised of a County mental health clinician and a city law enforcement officer, provide services to a sub-population of city residents who have been diagnosed with a serious and persistent mental illness and who also have a history of multiple contacts with law enforcement or visits to Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES), acts of physical aggression during encounters with law enforcement or others, domestic violence, or firearm use or possession. This program is intended to provide mental health services to individuals in the community that are most Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 48 vulnerable by focusing on joint welfare checks, clinical assessments with recommendations, case management and linkage to appropriate and available community mental health services. Currently, there are three MHET teams operating in the cities of Pittsburg, Richmond, and Walnut Creek. Central-East County Ceasefire Central-East Ceasefire, launched in FY 17/18, is a partnership among law enforcement agencies in Central and East County, service providers, faith leaders, and community members which seeks to reduce firearm violence through a deterrence model that uses law enforcement data to direct resources to individuals at the highest risk of being perpetrators or victims of gun violence. Central-East County Ceasefire has a committed Working Group that consists of at least one member from each role in the process which meets regularly to discuss gun related crimes in the community and identify individuals from those incidents who may meet the criteria for targeted interventions. The program, which is coordinated by a Lieutenant in the Pittsburg Police Department, aims to raise community awareness and support through the use of community led evening marches in impacted neighborhoods (“night walks”), and “call-ins” where law enforcement lead conversations with at-risk individuals to thwart the use of firearms in local communities. Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 49 AB 109 Population Outcomes Over the course of FY 2018/19 there were a total of 1061 AB 109 clients under supervision at some point in time. Of these AB 109 clients, 182 individuals successfully completed the terms of their Probation during the fiscal year. The following sections demonstrate the number of AB 109 clients who violated the terms of their supervision and served flash incarcerations or had their probation revoked, as well as the number of clients with new criminal charges filed against them or new criminal convictions during the fiscal year. Supervision Sanctions Probation officers use graduated sanctions with AB 109 clients. For instance, when clients have dirty drug tests, they are typically referred to inpatient or outpatient treatment rather than having their supervision term revoked and returned to custody. This allows them to receive treatment without further justice involvement. AB 109 Probation Officers may also use flash incarcerations of up to ten days in county jail for PRCS clients. This serves as an intermediate sanction where individuals must serve a short period of time in county jail, but do not have further criminal charges filed against them. Figure 35 shows that the number of flash incarcerations imposed on PRCS clients ranged from 14 to 26 per quarter. Figure 36: PRCS flash incarcerations Revocations of supervision were more common among PRCS clients compared to 1170(h) clients. As shown in Figures 36 and 37, 36% (n = 257) of PRCS clients had their probation revoked over the course of FY 2018/19 while 19% (n = 65) of the 1170(h) population experienced a revocation. Figure 37: Percentage and number of 1170(h) clients revoked 24 26 15 14 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4Count of Flash IncarcerationsNo Revocation 286 81% Revocation 65 19% Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 50 Figure 38: Percentage and number of PRCS clients revoked New Charges and Convictions The number of AB 109 individuals with new charges filed against them during FY 2018/19, as well as the number of AB 109 individuals who were convicted of a new criminal offense during FY 2018/19 are not available this fiscal year. The Court staff are transitioning to a new case management information system and do not have the capacity to provide the necessary data this year. No Revocation 453 64% Revocation 257 36% Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 51 Looking Ahead to Fiscal Year 2019 /20 Contra Costa County has responded to Public Safety Realignment in a manner that has allowed the County to provide supervision and services to the AB 109 population while building a collaborative reentry infrastructure to support the reentry population’s successful reintegration into the community. The County has followed best practice models in establishing access to services through the West County Reentry Success Center’s “one-stop” model and the Central & East Reentry Network’s “no wrong door” approach. The launch of the Office of Reentry and Justice (“ORJ”) in January 2017 is evidence that the County sees its Public Safety Realignment, reentry, and justice work as a high priority. As we look to fiscal year 2019/20, data collection and integration will continue to be a priority. The ORJ will continue to seek collaborations with County Departments and other agencies that hold data relevant to evaluation outcomes while also ensuring the privacy of confidential information. Data such as a history of behavioral health conditions and shelter usage will be areas of focus for integration during the FY 19/20. Integrated data will allow for the assessment of differential trajectories of criminal justice involvement based on housing instability or the presence of a behavioral health condition. Other agencies that hold relevant data include the California Department of Education and the CDCR. Other data related activities will be focused on on-going enhancements to the SAFE database for the use by CBO staff. These activities include regular monitoring of data consistency and integrity, training of new staff, and enhancements to the database that will allow additional programmatic data to be collected, as needed. It is anticipated that all SAFE users will be well trained on the basics of service referrals and goal completions by the end of FY 19/20. While the County’s reentry approach is centered on an integrated and supportive service network comprised of AB 109-contracted community-based organizations, public agencies and the broader community for the AB 109 reentry population to utilize, this model has shown to be somewhat limited in regard to reentry service provision during evening hours. Evening hours would allow for employed individuals to participate in supportive programming in addition to serving as a bridge for individuals seeking to access homeless services Warming Centers for the night. Further, given that some individuals are released from custody after 5 PM, an evening program may serve to improve engagement with individuals who are released after hours. Recognizing these needs, the Reentry Success Center has begun the implementation of extended hours in the coming fiscal year. During FY 19/20, the Office of Education plans to expand the pre-release pilot project to all three detention facilities, under a rebranded program called Game Plan for Success (GPS). While the findings from the pilot are limited, they are consistent with research showing that pre-release planning is an important evidence-based practice that helps reduce recidivism. Given the promising outcomes demonstrated by the pilot, the Office of Education seeks to move the reentry and reintegration system in a positive direction and intends to launch the GPS in the first quarter of FY 19/20. Contra Costa County Public Safety Realignment Annual Report: FY 2018/19 June 2020 | 52 Given that the initial experience with a part-time summer intern was highly successful, the ORJ will continue to recruit and draw on interns, as the budget allows, in order to support its priority efforts as well as to provide interns with a hands-on experience that will contribute to their future development and career. In collaboration with the California State Association of Counties (CSAC’s) Support Hub, County partners including the Probation Department and the Sheriff’s Office and led by the ORJ and the County Administrator’s Office (CAO) will be developing a strategic framework for data-driven and evidence-based practice. Key components of this framework include cost/benefit analyses, modified contracting policies, an integrated data infrastructure, and process and outcome evaluations. And, finally, in an effort to develop additional resources for the reentry system, the ORJ will continue to support the County’s efforts to compete for various state and federal grants, as well as continued advancement of the County’s efforts in “Stepping Up,” a national initiative to reduce the number of people with mental illnesses in jail. RECOMMENDATION(S): CONTINUE the emergency action originally taken by the Board of Supervisors on November 16, 1999 regarding the issue of homelessness in Contra Costa County. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for this action. BACKGROUND: On November 16, 1999, the Board of Supervisors declared a local emergency, pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 8630 on homelessness in Contra Costa County. Government Code Section 8630 requires that, for a body that meets weekly, the need to continue the emergency declaration be reviewed at least every 60 days until the local emergency is terminated. The Board of Supervisors last reviewed and continued the emergency declaration on April 28, 2020. Nevertheless, with the continuing high number of homeless individuals and insufficient funding available to assist in sheltering all homeless individuals and families, the emergency situation still exists and it is, therefore, appropriate for the Board to continue the declaration of a local emergency regarding homelessness. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/23/2020 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sarah Kennard, (925) 335-1910 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 23, 2020 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 76 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 23, 2020 Contra Costa County Subject:CONTINUE EXTENSION OF EMERGENCY DECLARATION REGARDING HOMELESSNESS