HomeMy WebLinkAboutRESOLUTIONS - 05062003 - 2003/295THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
AYES: SE71:'F?MSORS GIOTA, LIII:[ZFi%, MMM & DeSAilL=
NOES: NM
ABSENT: NM
ABSTAIN:NM
DlSMCr III IS VAGM',T
Resolution No, 20031 2, 4
Subject: Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act)
Schiff-Cardenas Crime Prevention )
Act of 2000)
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa desires to continue
programs designated under the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act to be funded in part
from funds made available through the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act program
administered by the Board of Corrections of the State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa
County hereby continues County Probation Officer Steven L. Bautista as the Chair of the
Contra Costa County Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council; and
AUTHORIZES said County Probation Officer, or the Chairperson of the Board
of Supervisors, to submit and/or to sign Contra Costa County's application for
approval for the County's Comprehensive Multiagency Juvenile Justice Plan
Modification and related contracts, amendments, or extensions with the State of
California; and
IDENTIFIES the following individuals as members of the Contra Costa County
Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council:
Mark DeSaulni r, Chair, Board of Supervisors
David Coleman, 111, Public Defender
John Cullen, Director, Dept. of Employment and Human Services
Shirley Marchetti, Executive Director, REACH Project, Inc.
Ruth Ormsby, Child/Adolescent Program Chief, Dept. of Mental Health
Joe Chick, County Superintendent of Schools
Warren Rupf, Sheriff-Coroner
Dave Cutaia, Chief of Police, City of Martinez and Representative,
Police Chiefs' Association
Robert Kochly, District Attorney
Taalia Hasan, Executive Director, Youth Service Bureau
Marianne Jameson, Community Member
ASSURES that the County of Contra Costa's Comprehensive Multiagency
Juvenile Justice Plan Modification has been developed, reviewed and provided to
the Board of Corrections in a format determined by the Board of Corrections not
later than May 1, 2003;
ASSURES that the County of Contra Costa Board of Supervisors and the
Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council have reviewed and approve the County's
Comprehensive Multiagency Juvenile Justice Plan Modification;
2 -
ASSURES that the County of Contra Costa will adhere to the requirements of
the Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act (Chapters 353 and 475 of the
Government Code) regarding the submission of the Comprehensive Multiagency
Juvenile Justice Plan Modification application, investment of allocated monies,
including any interest earnings, expenditures of said funds, and the submission of
required reports to the Beard of Corrections.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE BOARD ON May 6, 2003
i hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy
of an action taken and entered on the minutes of
the Board of Supervisors on the date shown:
AT'T'ESTED: INAy 6, 2003
JOHN SWEETEN, Clerk of the Board of
Supe' s s and CguntyyAdminis"tor ,F
sy
f
Contact: Dave Grassi, 3-4193
cc: County Probation Officer
County Administrator
County Auditor-Controller
Board of Corrections via Probation
RESOLUTION NO. 2003!
k
JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT
APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING
AND PLAN MODIFICATION
Section 1. County Information
Date of Appl'icati'on: April 24, 2003
Plan Year Modified: 2003-2404
County Name Contra Costa
Board of Chief Probation Officer
Corrections' Name Steven L. Bautista
Address 50 Douglas Dr., Suite 201
City/State/Zip Martinez CA 94553
Telephone (925) 313-4023JUVENILEJUSTICEFAx (925) 313-4191
CRIME PREVENTION
ACT
E-mail sbaut@prob-co-contra-costa.ca.us
APPLICATION FOR Plan Coordinator
CONTINUATION Name Lionel D. Chatman
FUNDING Address 50 Douglas Dr., Suite 201
AND PLAN City/State/Zip Martinez CA 94553
MODIFICATION Telephone (925)427-8384
FAX (925) 427-8490
E-mail khatr@prob.co.contra-costa.ca.us
P:l(B)St PP/KstoiVChaip475.Sectl.doc 1220/01 1
JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT
APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING
AND PLAN MODIFICATION
Section 2. Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council
Have there been any members added or deleted to the Juvenile Justice Coordinating
Council (JJCC)since submittal of the original CPA 2000 Application for Approval?
Place an x in the proper box and follow instructions)
No There are no changes to the JJCC membership. No further information is
neededin this section. Go to Section 3.
The following changes have been made to the JJCC:
Yes
NamelAoency Added Deleted
1. John Goin, Chair. Board of Supervisors
2. Mark DeSautn er, Chair, Board of Supervisors
3. Gary Yancey, District Attorney
4. Robert ttochly, District Attorney
5.
6.
7.
6•
9.
10.
11.
12.
Note: Section 749.22 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, Chapter 325. Statutes of 1998
mandates the following membership on theJuvenile justice coordinating council.
Additional members can be added If the County wishes,
The coordinating councils shall, at a minimum, include the chief probation officer, as
chair, and one representative each from the district attorney's office, the public
defender's office, the sheriffs department, the board of supervisors, the department of
social services,the department of mental health, a community-based'drug and alcohol
program, a city police department, the county office of education or a school district,
and an at-large, community representative. In order to carry out its duties pursuant to
this section, a coordinating council shall also include representatives from nonprofit
community-based organizations providing services to minors."
P:/(B)StaffCPP/Kstot!/Chap475.Sectf.doc 12/20/01 2
JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT
APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING
AND PLAN MODIFICATION
Section 3. Plan Modification
Will all programs currently funded in the existing BOC approved Comprehensive
Muklagency Juvenile Justice Plan (CMJJP) continue as originally designed and be
funded from FY 2002-2003 continuation funding?
No We want to make substantive program changes and/or add new programs.
Changes must be summarized in Section 3.1, 3.11 and 3.111, and 3.V.
We will continue all programs, but may make some program adjustments.
Yes Skip to Sections 3.1 and 3.IV and complete.
And/Or
We will continue all program, but will only make budget changes. Skip to
Yes Sections 3.11 and 3.V and complete.
Section 3.1 Modification Summary — to be completed by all counties
Summarize the proposed modification(s) including a discussion of the key activities
and events leading to the decision to modify the CMJJP. if deleting or adding new
programs provide an explanation. (No more than 3 pages,double-spatted, 12 point font)
See attached narrative
Section 3.11 Communities Facing Risk
This section is to be completed by only those counties where there has been a change
to the schools, neighborhoods, or communities facing risk that differs from the
information providedin the existing CMJJP. Describe the need to modify the plan,
identify or re-prioritize the areas impacted, and describe the effect on the new areas.
No more than 3 pages,double-spaced,12 paint font)
n/a
Section 3.111 New Program(s)
A. Which existing programs will be added, deleted/amended to allow for the
implementation of the proposed new program(s)
9. Family intervention Program
Added Deleted Amended
Q2. High School Challenge Team Program
3.
P:/(B)Ste#fCPP/Kstoll/Chsp475.Seetl.doc 12/20101 3
JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT
APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING
AND PLAN MODIFICATION
If the modified plan proposes a new program(s) complete the following information for
each new-rouram and also complete Section 3.V, "Budget Modification,"which
requests information on the deleted/reduced program and also for the new program:
1. New Program Name
a. Target Population
b. Number of Clients Projected
c. Program Category:
check all that Apply)
Prevention
intervention
Suppression
Incapacitation
2. Detailed description of the program(s) Narrative):
a. Describe collaborations with other agencies, including a description of how
information sharing will be coordinated.
b. Describe the basis upon which the program(s) has been determined to be
effective, citing the specific programs or approaches that have been
demonstrated to be effective in reducing delinquency and addressing juvenile
crime for any elements of response to juvenile crime and delinquency.
c. Include time frame(s) for major program activities, including a schedule for
implementation.
d. Detail the goals of the program and how they are related to the outcome
measures.
P:/o1)StafICPP/Kstoll/Chap475.Sectl.doe 12/20/41 4
JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT
APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING
AND PLAN MODIFICATION
e. Detail speck objectives and outcome measures to determine
effectiveness of the local juvenile justice action strategy and
the program.outcome measures to determine the
effectiveness of the proposed program shall at a minimum
address each of the following mandated outcomes:
The rate of successful completion of probation;
The rate of successful completion of restitution and court-
ordered ourtorderedcommunityserviceresponsibilities;
Arrest, incarceration, and probation violation rates of the
program participants; and
The quantification of the annual per capita costs of the
program (for programs using multiple funding sources, the
entre program per capita cost and the JJCPA only per capita
cost must be reported separately).
Section 31V Current Program(s) Modification
Provide a narrative discussion of substantive and non-substantive program
changes for each program in the approved C'MJJP'that will be modified. For
each program include:
a) Program Name: see attached narrative
b) Detailed description of the modification and reasons for
change: see attached narrative
c) Impact on collaborations and partners: see attached
narrative
d) Changes or modifications in outcome objectives and
outcome measures: see attached narrative
Section 3.V Budget Modifications
Utilize the budget grid on page s to identify the current bu4getet as shown in the
approved CMJJP plan and the new proposed budget.
Indicate',the modification type (check appropriate).
E] Budget Modification only
0 Now, enhanced, deleted or reduced program (describe on budget page).
Submit separate budget pages for each program modified.
P:I(B)St: PPWswil/Chap47S.See(l.doe 12/20/01 5
I'll
Contra Costa County Probation Department
JJCPA Third Year Funding Application
Section 3.1—Wodt) tion Summary
The Contra Costa Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council proposes to eliminate one
program and modify another existing Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act Program. A
review of our JJCPA state allocation, indicate that these finite funds do not address an
increased in employee benefit costs which required us to examine our funding resources
for each program,that resulted in, the submitted change in programmatic services.
Section 3.13 Current Oram(s)Wodj)rwatjoiVDefetion
a)Tyqgram 9vame. Family Intervention Program(Formerly the Family
Intervention in Substance Abuse Program).
6) Detaded description of the modifi' ration1de-retion and reasonsfor change.,
Family Intervention Program is a community-based program that used JJCPA funds to
provide services to adult substance use offenders and their families throughout Contra
Costa County. As the result of budgetary increases in employees benefit cost,the Contra
Costa County Probation Department cannot continue to fund this program and,
regretfully,it must be terminated. The elimination of this program will result in one
Probation Supervisor and three deputy probation officer positions eliminated and two
deputy probation officer positions will be reassigned to the High School program.
The Family Intervention Program has experienced a fair amount of success during its one
and half years of operation. Although full staffing of the program was delayed,due to
circumstances beyond our control,the probation supervisor and his staff worked hard to
facilitate positive change for substance abusing parents and their children. Data from the
first year of the program operation reveal the following positive outcomes.
1 of
JUVENILE .JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT
APPLICATION FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING
AND PLAN MODIFICATION
A. Program to be added n enhanced 0
Program Name: Deputy Probation Officers in High Schools
B. Program to be deleted Q reduced
Program Name:
i
524921
6885
29500
e
k
2950
28588
590804 344440
um
8x86/0+47
11803
43'194
18001 15000
959044 15000 538710
P:f(B)StaifCPP/Kstall/Chap475.Sectl.doc 12I2i310t
6
i
s
R [1t
4 i • i i i .Old
s 4 i r i
s a s - - i ' e - •
i
State Non-CPA
Current Budgetet
Fundi
Interest
Funds
Salaries and Benefits
Services and Supplies R A
Professional Services t s
Comm tin ity-Based Organizations
Fixed Assets/Equipment
Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of
a
State Ford )
Cather;
Fund Totals:r
Proposed Budged State
Interest
Non-CPA
Funds Funds
Salaries and Benefits
Services and Supplies r
Professional Services
Community-Based Organizations
Fixed Assets:!Equi meat
Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of
State Funds)
Other a
a
Fuad Totals
A .t' - t• 1 f
R
F R
f
ss
Current Budget State Non-CPA
Funds 1r t r st
Salaries and Benefits Funds
Services and Supplies
p M
Professional Services
Community-Based Organizations
Fixed Assets/Equipment
Administrative Overhead (Maximum O 5% ofStateFunds)
Other:
Fund Totals:
M p
rE3t state
Interest Non-CFA
Funds FundsSalariesandBenefits
a l
Services and Supplies
Professionalssional Servic s
a
Community-Based r anizatio s
Fixed AssetslEgui meat
Administrative Overhead (Maximum m 0.5% € fStateFunds)
Other
fill
Fund Totals
1 A
a o s a - s a - • s s
s •
e a ' e x • s s
Current Budget
Stag
Interest Non-GPA
Funds Funds
Salaries and Benefits t
Services and Supplies t
Professional Services
Community-Based Organizations
Fixed Assets/Equipment
Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of
b
State Funds)
Other-
Fund Totals:t i
Stag Non-CP
Pro d Ei €
Fundi
Interest
Funds
Salaries and Benefits t
Services and Supplies t
Professional Services t
Community-Based Organizations
Fixed Assets/Equipment
Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of
t
Stag Funds)
Other t
Frond Totals t t t
t
Current Budget
State
Interest
Nora-CPA
Funds Funds
Salaries and Benefits
Services and Supplies
Professional Services s
Community-Based Organizations
Fixed Assets/Equipment
Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of
1 9 f
State Funds
Other. k
Fund Totals,t
ro osed Budget
State
Interest
Non-CPA.
Funds Funds
Salaries and Benefits
Services and Supplies
Professional Services
Community-Based Organizations
Fined Assets/Equipment
Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of
State Funds)
OtherS E E
Fund Totals
e : s - - • . : s - s
s t
Currant Budget State
Interest Non-CP-A
Funds Funds
Salaries and Benefits r
Services and Supplies
Professional Services
Community-Based Organizations
Fixed As etslEquipment
Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of
State Funds
Other:
Fund Totals, E
Proposed tdget State
Interest Noy-CPQ
Fends Funds
and Benefits
Services and Supplies E <
Professional Services
Community-Based Organizations
Fixed Assets/Equipment
Administrative Overhead (Maximum o.5% of
State Funds)
Other
Fund Totals
e .e t• ! !
s
i i s r - a i - i -
M !
f i t N •
i i i
Current Budget
State
Interest
Non-CPB
Funds Funds
Salaries and Benefits
Services and Supplies
Professional Services
Community-Based Organizations
Fixed Assets/Equipment
Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of
6
State Funds
Fund Totals.
Proposed Budge
State
Interest
Non-CPA
Funds Funds
Salaries and Benefits
Services and Supplies
Professional Services
Community-BasedOrganizations
Frac! Assets/Equipment
Administrative Overhead (Maximum 0.5% of
State Funds)
Other Baa :
Farad Totals a
Contra Costa County Probation Department
JJCPA Third Year Funding Application
Section 3.1-- ' Xi cation Summary
The Contra Costa Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council proposes to eliminate one
program and modify another existing Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act Program. A
review of our JJCPA state allocation, indicate that these finite funds do not address an
increased in employee benefit costs which required us to examine our funding resources
for each program,that resulted in, the submitted change in programmatic services.
Section 3.IV Currrrrt Ovgram(s}9WOd ficatian1Oefn*n
a)Ovgmm Name:Family Intervention Program(Formerly the Family
Intervention in Substance Abuse Program).
b) Oetaifed descTtion of thefuatiarnldefetwn and reasomfir cfiaVe.•
Family Intervention Program is a community-based program that used JJCPA funds to
provide services to adult substance use offenders and their families throughout Contra
Costa County. As the result of budgetary increases in employees benefit cost,the Contra
Costa County Probation Department cannot continue to fund this program and,
regretfully, it must be terminated.The elimination of this program will result in one
Probation Supervisor and three deputy probation officer positions eliminated and two
deputy probation officer positions will be reassigned to the High School program.
The Family Intervention Program has experienced a fair amount of success during its one
and half years of operation. Although full staffing of the program was delayed, due to
circumstances beyond our control,the probation supervisor and his staff worked hard to
facilitate positive change for substance abusing parents and their children. Data from the
first year of the program operation reveal the following positive outcomes.
I of 4
Contra Costa County Probation Department
JJCPA Third Year Funding Application
Adult participants experienced reductions in felony and misdemeanor convictions and a
curbing of drug problems through participation. Youth participants benefited also, as we
observed a reduction in habitual truancy and school attendance problems among the
client population. However, it was notable that delinquency outcomes did not apply to
these youth clients as none were involved in the juvenile justice system at intake or
became involved during the evaluation period. The adult clients in this population were
typically parents of preschool age children.
c) Impact on collaboration and paw
As indicated in our application submitted for the second year of funding, modification to
this program eliminated the "multidisciplinary teams". As implemented,these `teams„
acted in a variety of organizational settings, ranging from informal discussions among
caseworkers from various agencies,to target case screenings by regional mental
health/probation/social services teams. Therefore,we do not anticipate any negative or
positive impact on existing collaboration and partnerships.
d) Changes or moduations in outcome objectives and outcome measures:
There is no six-month follow-up data collection for the Family Intervention Substance
Abuse program. However, we will stop collecting program evaluation data for this
program as of June 30,2003.
Section 3.IV Current Otgram{s)Wo&jicadon
a) Otgram 9Vame:High School Challenge Team Program
6) Oetuiteddescription of the mod:', kation acrd reasonsfar change.
The Juvenile Justice Crime Prevention Act currently supports the High School Program.
The High School Program is an expansion of the Challenge Grant I program in Contra
Costa County. Beginning in fiscal year 2003-2004,the two remaining Family
2 of 4
Contra Costa County Probation Department
JJCPA Third Year Funding Application
Intervention Deputy positions will be reassigned to the High School Program. We
believe this is an opportunity for the Department to provide services to local area high
schools, and at-risk youth in school. During the first fiscal year of JJCPA,the High
School Program in Contra Costa County performed well yielding promising outcomes for
highschool age youth involved in the court system. Program outcomes during the first
year included improvements in grade point averages, a reduction in days missed from
school, days with one or more class cuts, the rate of arrest, habitual truancy, school
attendance problems, alcohol and other drug problems. This program focuses directly on
the prevention of juvenile crime in the short-term.
c) Impact on coQaborations andpartnem
The addition of two deputy probation officer positions will expand and enhance existing
partnerships with School Districts and the County. The collaboration/partnership among
school personnel, resource officer and the deputy probation officer create the school
safety team that employs a variety of preventive strategies design to keep youth from
entering or re-entering the formal juvenile justice system. This collaboration will enhance
services to the targeted high schools.
d) Cfianges or modifyations in outcome o0ectims and outcome measures:
With the added two high schools to this program, data collection will remain the same but
with additional clients, the number of client to be served will increase.
Section 3.IV Cwnw Ovgram(s)Modijl cation
a)0rogrum Name. Fee for Service Funding
6) Oet fed descriptiom of Me mod:fuatum and r=onsfear cfiatW
Due to increased costs,the JJCPA allocation for fiscal year 2003/2004 will not cover the
entire expense for existing programs. In order to meet budget requirements, it has been
3 of 4
Contra Costa County Probation Department
JJCPA Third Year Funding Application
determined that a reduction in the fee for service funds is needed. Originally, 312,000
were designated for the purchase of services on an as-needed basis,however that amount
has been changed to 206,000.Therefore, approximately 106,000 have reduced these
funds.
c) Impact on codfa6orations andpartnerx
We do not anticipate any impact of these changes on the collaboration and partners
d) Changes or modtfuatiom in outcome o4fwtives and outcome measures:
We make no proposed changes or modifications in the outcome objectives and outcome
measures.
4 of 4