HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08032010 - SD.4RECOMMENDATION(S):
CONSIDER approving response to Grand Jury Report No. 1008, entitled "County Elder
Services Facing Life Support" and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to forward response to
the Superior Court no later than August 20, 2010.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
BACKGROUND:
No May 23, 2010 the 2009/10 Civil Grand Jury filed the above-referenced report, which
was reviewed by the Board of Supervisors and subsequently referred to the County
Administrator for response. The County Administrator worked with the Employment and
Human Services Department who prepared the attached response that clearly specifies:
Whether a finding or recommendation is accepted or will be implemented;1.
If a recommendation is accepted, a statement as to who will be responsible for
implementation an by what definite target date;
2.
A delineation f the constraints if a recommendation is accepted but cannot be
implemented within a six month period; and
3.
APPROVE OTHER
RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
Action of Board On: 08/03/2010 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
Clerks Notes:See Addendum
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor
Gayle B. Uilkema, District II
Supervisor
Mary N. Piepho, District III
Supervisor
Susan A. Bonilla, District IV
Supervisor
Federal D. Glover, District V
Supervisor
Contact: Dorothy Sansoe,
925-335-1009
I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the date shown.
ATTESTED: August 3, 2010
David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
By: June McHuen, Deputy
cc:
SD.4
To:Board of Supervisors
From:David Twa, County Administrator
Date:August 3, 2010
Contra
Costa
County
Subject:Respons to Grand Jury Report #1008 - County Elder Services Facing Life Support
4.
BACKGROUND: (CONT'D)
The reason for not accepting or adopting a finding or recommendation. Please see
attached response.
CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT:
CLERK'S ADDENDUM
APPROVED with language modifications of today to: a) Insert a statement into the
response to Recommendation 3 to clarify that face-to-face case work has been reduced
not eliminated; b) insert “continue to” into the response to Recommendation 4 that it
read “The Board of Supervisors will continue to review funding needs for the IHSS
program in conjunction with the funding needs of other County funded programs.”
ATTACHMENTS
Grand Jury Report 1008
Response to Grand Jury Report 1008