Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05112010 - C.30RECOMMENDATION(S): SUPPORT SB 1291 (Leno), a bill that requires evaluation of any chemical used as a flame retardant and prohibits a person from using a new flame retardant in the manufacture or in connection with upholstered furniture, bedding and filling materials, until the Department of Toxic Substances Control completes an evaluation of the new flame retardant, as recommended by the Director of Public Health. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact to the County. BACKGROUND: Flammability standards specific to California for furniture, children’s products, bed coverings, and bedding products have led to the de facto requirement that chemical Halogenated Flame Retardants (HFRs) be incorporated into furniture and bedding sold in California. These HFRs are similar in structure to both dioxins and PCBs (Polychlorinated biphenyls)– two extremely toxic chemicals. We do not know for certain what these HFR chemicals do to humans and infants; the APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 05/11/2010 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, (925) 335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: May 11, 2010 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Katherine Sinclair, Deputy cc: C.30 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:May 11, 2010 Contra Costa County Subject:SUPPORT Position for SB 1291 (Leno): Chemicals of Concern: Flame Retardants chemical industry is not required to carry out any health studies before introducing these toxic chemicals into our homes and children’s products – in quantities measured in pounds per home. In animal studies, these chemicals cause cancer, neurological impairments like hyperactivity, reproductive problems like lower sperm count and microtestes, thyroid problems, and/or endocrine disruption in every species studied. PBDE (Polybrominated diphenyl ethers) flame retardants were used in polyurethane foam furniture and juvenile products sold in California from the 1975 until 2004, when they were banned in California. However, other similar HFRs for which there is no adequate human health information are still used. If more than trace quantities of these chemicals were drifting over refinery fences into our communities, there would be justifiable outrage. Instead, we are inviting pounds of these toxic chemicals directly into our homes. The ostensible reason for including toxic HFRs in furniture, bedding and children’s products is fire safety. But according the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), there is no credible evidence that these toxic chemicals actually reduce fire deaths in California. Fire deaths did decline by 38% in California from 1980 to 1999, when these chemicals began to be used in our furniture and baby products, but the decline was even greater in other states that do not have standards leading to the use of these toxic chemicals. There is substantial risk to our children’s health from these chemicals for no measurable benefit. The pounds of these chemicals found in homes in our furniture and baby products leak out into dust, pets, humans, and the environment. Children and infants are most sensitive to the adverse health effects of this class of chemical toxins. Our babies are born with HFRs in their bodies and get a further dose from their mother’s milk and exposure to baby products. Toddlers have much higher levels than their mothers. California has unique laws encouraging the use of HFRs. As a result, Californians have the highest body burdens in the world of the HFR pentaBDE, a known potent endocrine disrupting chemical. The California Conference of Local Health Officers (CCLHO) along with experts from the California Department of Public Health held a study session on HFRs last year. Based on that session CCLHO endorsed SB 772 (Leno), which would have removed HFRs from children’s products. That bill was narrowly defeated, largely on the argument that the issue of HFRs should be considered under the provisions of California’s Green Chemistry Initiative. SB 1291 will provide for that evaluation. This bill seeks to clarify that the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), in enacting the Green Chemistry Initiative for the purpose of reviewing chemicals used in consumer products for environmental and human health impacts, must include chemicals used to meet furniture, fire safety standards promulgated by the Bureau of Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation (BEARHFTI). Additionally this bill prohibits the use of new chemical flame retardants prior to their review by the Green Chemistry process and requires DTSC, in consultation with specified state agencies and interdepartmental workgroups, to perform a comparative risk assessment that compares the benefits and risks of the regulations adopted by, or technical bulletins issued by, the bureau with the benefits and risks of those flame retardants the department identifies as chemicals of concern. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) SUPPORT: Breathe California, Environment California, Environmental Working Group OPPOSITION: American Chemistry Council, CalChamber. California Manufacturers and Technology Association, Chemical Industry Council of California, Consumer Specialty Products Association, International Sleep Products ATTACHMENTS SB 1291 Bill Text AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 5, 2010 SENATE BILL No. 1291 Introduced by Senator Leno February 19, 2010 An act relating to home furnishings to add Article 15 (commencing with Section 25257.5) to Chapter 6.5 of Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to hazardous chemicals. legislative counsel’s digest SB 1291, as amended, Leno.Home furnishings: bedding products. Chemicals of concern: flame retardants. (1)  Existing law requires the Department of Toxic Substance Control to adopt regulations to establish a process by which chemicals or chemical ingredients in products may be identified and prioritized for consideration as being chemicals of concern and to adopt regulations to establish a process by which chemicals of concern may be evaluated. The regulations are required to adopt regulations that specify actions that the department may take following the completion of the analysis. A violation of the hazardous waste control law is a crime. Existing law, the Home Furnishings and Thermal Insulation Act, administered by the Bureau of Electronic and Applicance Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings, and Thermal Insulation, requires all bedding products, other than mattresses and mattress sets, that the bureau determines to contribute to mattress bedding fires to comply with specified regulations adopted by the bureau imposes specified flame retardant requirements. This bill would require the department to evaluate any chemical that is used, or is proposed to be used, as a flame retardant, as defined, in 98 accordance with those regulations and to identify and prioritize those flame retardants that may be considered as being chemicals of concern. The bill would prohibit a person from using a new flame retardant in the manufacture of, or otherwise in connection with, any upholstered furniture, bedding and filling materials, until the department completes this evaluation of that new flame retardant. The bill would require the department, in consultation with the specified state agencies and interdepartmental workgroups, to perform a comparative risk assessment that compares the benefits and risks of the regulations adopted by, or technical bulletins issued by, the bureau with the benefits and risks of those flame retardants the department identifies as chemicals of concern. The bill would require a person to use a flame retardant in accordance with the regulatory responses adopted by the department. By creating new prohibitions, the violation of which would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2)  The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would suspend the bureau’s preparation of specified flammability regulations contained in Technical Bulletin 604 and establish a multiagency task force to evaluate fire safety standards in light of reported health and environmental hazards posed by toxic flame retardant chemicals and materials. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no yes. State-mandated local program: no yes. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 2 3 SECTION 1.Article 15 (commencing with Section 25257.5) is added to Chapter 6.5 of Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code, to read: 98 — 2 —SB 1291 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Article 15.Toxic Flame Retardants 25257.5.For purposes of this article, the following definitions shall apply: (a)  “Bedding” has the same meaning as defined in Section 19007 of the Business and Profession Code. (b)  “Bureau” means the Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings, and Thermal Insulation, as established in Section 9810 of the Business and Professions Code. (c)  “Filling material” means cotton, wool, kapok, feathers, downs, hair, liquid, or any other material, substance, or any combination thereof, loose or in batting, pads, or any other prefabricated form, concealed or not concealed, to be used or that could be used in articles of bedding or upholstered furniture. (d)  “Flame retardant” means a chemical that is, or is proposed to be, used to comply with any regulation adopted by, or technical bulletin issued by, the bureau pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 19000) of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code to implement the requirements of Section 19161 of the Business and Professions Code. (e)  “New flame retardant” means a chemical that is a flame retardant and that is first used on or after January 1, 2011, for purposes of complying with the regulations or technical bulletins specified in subdivision (d). (f)  “Upholstered furniture” has the same meaning as defined in Section 19006 of the Business and Professions Code. (g)  All other terms used in this article shall have the same meaning as defined in Article 14 (commencing with Section 25251). 25257.6.(a)  The department shall evaluate any chemical that is used, or is proposed to be used, as a flame retardant in accordance with the regulations adopted pursuant to Section 25252 and shall identify and prioritize the chemicals that are used, or proposed to be used, as flame retardants that the department considers as being chemicals of concern, in accordance with the review process specified in Section 25252.5. (b)  (1)  After completing the evaluation pursuant to subdivision (a), the department shall subsequently evaluate any flame retardant that the department has identified as a chemical of concern by determining how best to limit exposure or reduce the level of 98 SB 1291— 3 — 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 hazard posed by that flame retardant, in accordance with the regulations adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 25253. (2)  In addition to evaluating the potential alternatives and potential hazards pursuant to the requirements of the regulations specified in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a) of Section 25253, the department shall, in consultation with the bureau, the office, and any other state agencies or interdepartmental workgroups, perform a comparative risk assessment that compares the benefits and risks of the regulations adopted by, or technical bulletins issued by, the bureau pursuant to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 19000) of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code to implement the requirements of Section 19161 of the Business and Professions Code, with the benefits and risks of those flame retardants that the department has identified as chemicals of concern. (3)  The department may, after completing the process specified in paragraphs (1) and (2), take any of the regulatory responses specified in subdivision (b) of Section 25253. 25257.7.(a)  A person shall not use a new flame retardant in the manufacture of, or otherwise in connection with, any upholstered furniture or bedding and filling materials until the department has completed the evaluation of that new flame retardant pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 25257.6. (b)  If the department identifies a flame retardant as a chemical of concern pursuant to Section 25257.6, a person may use the flame retardant only in accordance with the regulatory responses adopted by the department pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 25257.6. 25257.8.The requirements of the article are in addition to, and shall not otherwise affect the authority of the department pursuant to, Article 14 (commencing with Section 25251). SEC. 2.No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution. 98 — 4 —SB 1291 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 SECTION 1.The Legislature hereby finds and declares the following: (a)  Existing law requires bedding products, other than mattresses and mattress sets, that the Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings, and Thermal Insulation determines to contribute to mattress bedding fires to comply with regulations adopted by the bureau. (b)  It is the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would do both of the following: (1)  Suspend the bureau’s preparation of regulations contained in Technical Bulletin 604. (2)  Establish a multiagency task force to evaluate current fire safety standards in light of reported health and environmental hazards posed by toxic flame retardant chemicals and materials. O 98 SB 1291— 5 —