Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02232010 - SD.13RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT report on Phase 1 of the State Route 239 Project, AUTHORIZE the District III Supervisor to send letters to San Joaquin County, Alameda County, cities and transportation agencies regarding the project, and AUTHORIZE staff to begin work on the project. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE to the General Fund. The County has received federal authorizations totalling $14 million for the planning and development of State Route 239. Phase 1 will cost an estimated $3.7 million. The cost will be covered by the federal earmarks received for the 239 project and 20 percent local matching funds provided by the County Road Fund. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County has received $14 million in federal funding authorization for planning, environmental review and development of State Route 239, sometimes referred to as the Brentwood-Tracy Expressway. State Route 239 is defined in California Streets and Highway Code as a state highway connecting State Route 4 near Brentwood to Interstate 205 near Tracy. The County APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 02/23/2010 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Gayle B. Uilkema, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Susan A. Bonilla, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: John Greitzer 335-1201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: February 23, 2010 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: SD.13 To:Board of Supervisors From:Catherine Kutsuris, Conservation & Development Director Date:February 23, 2010 Contra Costa County Subject:State Route 239 Project, Phase 1 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) formally applied for state and federal authorization to use the funds a year ago. On January 21, 2010 we finally received formal authorization to use the funds and begin Phase 1 of the project, which is the Planning Phase. After Phase 1 is complete, the project will move into Phase 2, which is the environmental review process, and finally Phase 3 which consists of engineering and design, right-of-way acquisition and construction. Substantially more funding will be needed for construction. The County requested the federal funding after years of asking Caltrans to start planning the route, to no avail. Since the route was not a high priority for Caltrans, the County sought and received federal funding for a planning process that will involve San Joaquin County, Alameda County, Brentwood, Tracy and Livermore, numerous transportation agencies and special districts, businesses, and community groups. This request is consistent with recommendations of the Altamont Interregional Corridor Study prepared by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission in 1996. Caltrans will be a key participant in the process, since the route is ultimately intended to be a state highway. This local, collaborative process to develop a future state highway is similar to the model that was used to develop the new segment of State Route 4 in Antioch, Oakley and Brentwood, currently known as the State Route 4 Bypass. The County and the Cities of Antioch, Brentwood and Oakley formed a joint powers agency to finance, design and build the Bypass to Caltrans standards so it could become part of the Caltrans state highway system. That route is now in the process of being accepted by Caltrans as State Route 4. The County has seen an increase in traffic between southeastern Contra Costa and the Tracy area, particularly truck traffic, but we lack the road system to handle it. The only two roads linking Contra Costa County and San Joaquin County are Byron Highway and State Route 4 through the Delta. Both are rural, undivided two-lane roads, not capable of effectively moving the traffic that we see now and expect in the future. State Route 239 can serve several important needs for eastern Contra Costa County. It will aid in general traffic circulation in that part of the county, help promote economic development at Byron Airport, absorb truck traffic which is currently disruptive to the community of Byron, and provide some potential congestion relief to I-580 which is one of the Bay Area's most congested freeways. The existing Byron Highway likely is one of the alternative routes that will be looked at in the Phase 1 planning process, along with other alternatives that will be identified as planning ensues. The County General Plan supports development of a new expressway-type road connecting Brentwood with points southwest of the county line. Development of State Route 239 is also acknowledged in the East Contra Costa Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan. Attached as Exhibit A is the project background and preliminary scope of work that was part of our authorization submittal to Caltrans. This provides a general description of the project and how Phase 1 will be carried out. It is subject to change as a consultant team is recruited and works on a final work scope. Exhibit B is a letter for signature by the District III Supervisor, to be sent to the participating counties, cities, districts, transportation agencies and other entities. The letter may be customized a bit for particular recipients as needed, but it will be substantially similar to the letter shown in Exhibit B. The Board is asked to accept this report, authorize the letter from the District III Supervisor, and authorize staff to begin working on the project. The Department of Conservation and Development will be the lead department for Phase 1 (planning) and Phase 2 (environmental review) . The Public Works Department will take the lead on Phase 3 (project development). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The State Route 239 Project will be delayed, posing some risk of losing the federal funds. ATTACHMENTS Summary process SR 239 letter supervisor piepho Contra Costa County Federal Earmark Project -- SR 239 (TIP ID: CC-070019) February 17, 2009 Objective: The objective of the project is to study development of the State Route (SR) 239 corridor. The corridor is defined in state statute “from Route 580 west of Tracy to Route 4 near Brentwood,” and in the federal earmark language “from State Route 4 in Brentwood area to I-205 in Tracy area.” Determination of the future owner-operator of any constructed corridor facility would be pending completion of the study effort. Phasing: The project will be divided into three phases: 1) Planning; 2) Project Approval/Environmental Document, and 3) Project Development. Phase 1 – Planning Phase, including Phases 1A and 1B. Phase 1A will include stakeholder identification, outreach, establishing a multi- jurisdictional partnership to oversee the process, and technical analysis and consensus building on a range of alternatives and ultimately consensus on a preferred alignment for SR 239. The analysis will examine different road classifications as well, such as a regional or county-level expressway, and alternative institutional strategies to build, operate and maintain the roadway. Key outcomes of Phase 1A will be the multi-county partnership and a Feasibility Study, which will analyze a range of alternatives and result in a preferred alignment. This planning-level study will lead into Phase 1B, which will develop a Project Study Report or similar programming document. Phase 1B will develop a Project Study Report (PSR), based on the preferred alignment developed through the Feasibility Study in Phase 1A. This phase will be conducted by the consultant team and will meet Caltrans standards, procedures and formatting for a PSR. We expect to use $3.2 million in earmark funds for Phase 1 (see attached work scope). Phase 2 -- Project Approval/Environmental Document (PA/ED) Phase, which will include environmental clearance under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). We expect to use approximately $3.8 million in earmark funds for Phase 2. Amore precise cost estimate will be developed at the close of Phase 1. Phase 3 -- the Project Development Phase including design, engineering, and as much right-of-way acquisition and construction as funding allows. We expect to use approximately $7 million in earmark funds for Phase 3. A more precise cost estimate will be developed at the close of Phase 2. A task-by-task Work Scope beings on the next page. Contra Costa County SR 239 Federal Earmark Project 2 Work Scope: Contra Costa County Federal Earmark Project -- SR 239 (TIP ID: CC-070019) Phase 1 -- Planning This first phase of the project includes stakeholder identification and outreach, developing an inter-agency structure for the process, extensive background research, technical analyses, production of a Feasibility Study that will examine a broad range of alternatives and result in consensus on a preferred alignment for State Route (SR) 239, and development of a Project Study Report (PSR) based on the preferred alignment identified in the Feasibility Study. Phase 1A Task 1. Identify and contact stakeholders for the three-county project area (Contra Costa, San Joaquin and Alameda Counties). Task budget: $10,000 Potential stakeholders include the cities and counties, Caltrans District 4 and District 10, state and federal resource agencies and transportation agencies, public transit providers, councils of government, community groups, issue-oriented advocacy groups, and others. Attachment 1 lists the potential stakeholders identified to date, but it is anticipated additional stakeholders will be identified as the process moves forward. This task will include expanding and completing the stakeholder list as needed, and identifying any issues or concerns each of the stakeholders has regarding the SR 239 corridor as statutorily defined. Deliverable 1: Final list of stakeholders and initial issues statements. Task 2. Initiate outreach program and develop an inter-agency institutional structure to serve as a steering group for the project.. Task budget: $60,000 Convene the initial stakeholders group. The stakeholders group will determine the best structure for a project steering group. This could be a formal structure such as a Joint Exercise of Powers Agency similar to the State Route 4 Bypass Authority that was created to oversee construction of the State Route 4 Bypass in eastern Contra Costa County, or it could be a less formal structure such as a steering committee based on a memorandum of understanding. The task budget of $60,000 assumes the highest-cost structure, which would be the creation of a Joint Exercise of Powers Agency. This alternative will require substantial legal assistance. A technical advisory committee also will be created as part of this task. Deliverable 2: Document creating the institutional structure for a steering group, such as a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement. Contra Costa County SR 239 Federal Earmark Project 3 Task 3. Select Project Consultant or team of consultants and initiate consultant work. Task budget: $30,000 Phase 1 will require a combination of skills including, but not limited to, general transportation planning, highway engineering, community outreach, technical analysis such as travel demand forecasting and geographic information systems (GIS) capability, knowledge of transportation funding sources, and familiarity with the state’s process for developing and adopting new state highways. Given the wide range of skills that will be required, it is expected that a team of consulting firms will be hired rather than one individual firm. The interagency steering group create in Task 2 will be asked to participate in selecting the consultant team. The consultant team will be involved in all remaining tasks shown in this Scope of Work. One of the consultant’s first tasks will be to assist in the development of a Public Participation Program, which will identify how and when input will be received from community groups and individuals who are not part of the interagency steering group or the Technical Advisory Committee. The Public Participation Program will be subject to approval by the interagency steering group. The Public Participation Program must offer adequate opportunity for all interested parties to participate, including individuals who are not members of any organized interested group or public agency. Deliverable 3-1: Consultant contract for Phase 1 including detailed consultant work scope. Deliverable 3-2: Public Participation Program Task 4. Conduct Feasibility Study on SR 239 in the context of the regional highway network. Task budget: $1,000,000 This task will involve background research, development of a set of alternative alignments, technical analyses, public outreach, consensus-building on the role that SR 239 should serve in the context of the regional and interregional highway networks, and consensus on a preferred alignment for the route. The preferred alignment will be carried forward for further analysis through a PSR, which is the next task. SR 239 will serve several functions in the interregional network. For example, SR 239 could serve as a new truck route for freight; a stimulus for economic development in the region’s industrial areas; a reliever for some I-580 interregional traffic between the Central Valley and Bay Area; a route for commuters in future growth areas such as Mountain House; or a quicker higher-capacity route from existing regional roads to the Central Valley highway network. This task will take into account the adopted general plans and policies of the affected jurisdictions and agencies, and other relevant plans and studies that have been completed. The function and purpose of SR 239 will be evaluated in relation to the surrounding State Highway System including I-5, I-580, SR 4, unconstructed SR 84 (Vasco Road), and other relevant local routes. A major early part of this task will be the development of a travel demand forecasting model that can be used to develop traffic forecasts for the multi-county region. This model may incorporate aspects of the existing models of the San Joaquin Council of Contra Costa County SR 239 Federal Earmark Project 4 Governments, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority, and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. The consultant team will use all of the background information, travel demand model and other data to develop a set of alternative alignments for the highway, and will perform comprehensive analysis, including travel demand forecasting, identifying likely environmental issues (not to CEQA-level detail) and fatal flaws, cost/benefit analysis, and other analysis as necessary to determine the preferred alternative for further study. The Feasibility Study will include information on any already-planned or anticipated improvements to the highway network, and identify funding opportunities for the SR 239 project. Travel forecasts will take into account growth in both freight and non-freight transportation. Opportunities for public-private partnerships and toll financing will be evaluated. Modal factors will be included in the analysis (transit, bicycle, pedestrian, high-occupancy vehicle and park-and-ride considerations). In addition to potential alignments, alternative design standards will be evaluated, such as whether the facility could be built as a State Highway, County Expressway, or other roadway classification. The advantages and disadvantages of each design will be analyzed and reported in the study, including the capacities, costs, timeframes for design and construction, and right-of-way needs for each type of design. The travel demand forecasting will include an analysis of the impacts of any proposed new interchanges on existing state routes, in terms of level of service, weaving, and capacity to accommodate high volumes of departing and arriving traffic. The analysis also will examine different institutional strategies for building, operating and maintaining the facility (including the State Route 4 Bypass model, in which local interests funded and built the facility to Caltrans design standards, and then relinquished the highway to Caltrans). Deliverables 4-1-a through 4-1-x: Travel demand forecasting model and all necessary supporting documentation, to be determined. Typically this documentation includes, at a minimum, a thorough description of how the model was developed and the transportation and land use assumptions on which it is based, a list of all data sources and description of any changes that were made to the data including the reasons and methodology used, description of the model calibration and validation process, and a users’ manual. Deliverable 4-2-a through 4-2-x: Feasibility Study and all necessary supporting technical documentation, to be determined by the interagency steering group and the consultant(s). Deliverable 4-3: Report addressing the Route Adoption Process, should the State agree to incorporate the facility into the State Highway System Phase 1B Task 5: Prepare Project Study Report for SR 239. Task budget: $2.6 million Contra Costa County SR 239 Federal Earmark Project 5 The PSR will be performed on the “build” alignment identified in the Feasibility Study and will be developed to Caltrans’ standards to ensure it can be used for Phase 2 of the Federal Earmark project, which will be the Project Approval/Environment Document (PA/ED) Phase. The PSR will be prepared to meet state requirements as described in the Caltrans Project Development Procedures Manual. The PSR will be based on policy guidance provided by the interagency steering group, thorough technical analysis performed by the consultant team and vetted by the Technical Advisory Committee, and any other relevant information. The PSR will define the project and provide cost estimates and a Funding and Implementation Plan for full buildout of the preferred alternative for SR 239. Deliverables 5-1-a through 5-1-x: Reports and technical memoranda as needed Deliverable 5-2: Project Study Report for the State Route 239 Corridor Task-by-task schedule and budget Task Completion Estimated task cost Earmark funding Local match (88.5%) (11.5%) 1. Stakeholder identification Jan-09 $10,000 $8,850 $1,150 2. Develop institutional structure * Sep-09 $60,000 $53,100 $6,900 3. Consultant selection / project initialization Jan-10 $30,000 $26,550 $3,450 4. Feasibility Study ** Dec-10 $1,000,000 $885,000 $115,000 5. Project Study Report Dec-11 $2,600,000 $2,301,000 $299,000 Totals Dec-11 $3,700,000 $3,274,500 $425,500 * -- For Task 2, the timeline for completion and estimated task cost assume the structure will be a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, which will require legal assistance and will take longer to formalize than less formal structures because it will require approval by the governing bodies of all participating jurisdictions and agencies, and development of governing procedures, a system for voting and taking actions, and other operating details. If a less complex structure is selected, the time for completion and task cost likely will be less. ** -- Task 4 includes the development of a travel demand forecasting model that will be used for the Feasibility Study and for the Project Study Report in Task 5. Contra Costa County SR 239 Federal Earmark Project 6 List of potential stakeholders identified for SR 239 Federal Earmark Project One of the early tasks in this project will be the creation of a Public Participation Program, which will enable all interested parties the opportunity to provide input, regardless of whether they are with an organized group or not. There are many potential stakeholders and participants, some known and some not yet known to us. The list below is only a preliminary list, focusing on government agencies and organized interest groups that are known to Contra Costa County staff. It is expected that many more stakeholders will be identified and contacted through the public participation program, particularly stakeholders in San Joaquin and Alameda Counties. Alameda County Alameda County Congestion Management Agency Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bishop Ranch Business Park Brentwood Agricultural Land Trust Byron Airport (Contra Costa County Public Works Dept.) Byron Municipal Advisory Council California Highway Patrol California State Automobile Association Caltrans District 4 and District 10 Chambers of Commerce (Livermore, Brentwood, San Joaquin jurisdictions’ chambers) Cities of Antioch, Brentwood, and Oakley in Contra Costa County City of Livermore in Alameda County City of Tracy in San Joaquin County Clifton Forebay—California Water Project Congressional District 10 and District 11 Offices Contra Costa Council Contra Costa County Contra Costa County Agricultural Task Force Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Discovery Bay Community Services District East Bay Economic Development Association East Contra Costa Fire Protection District East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan Association Farm Bureau Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Hacienda Business Park Harvest Time (non-profit based in Brentwood) Knightsen Town Advisory Council Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Mountain House Community Services District Port of Stockton Property Owners Contra Costa County SR 239 Federal Earmark Project 7 Resource agencies (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, CA Department of Fish and Game) Safeway San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG) San Joaquin County San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission (ACE Train—Altamont Commuter Express) San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Save Mount Diablo State Legislators’ Offices Tri Delta Transit Tri Valley Business Council Tribal governments TRANSPLAN Committee (transportation coordinating group for eastern Contra Costa jurisdictions) Trucking industry Union Pacific Railroad Utility districts Mary N. Piepho Supervisor, District III 181 Sand Creek Road, Suite L Brentwood, CA 94513 February 23, 2010 Dear (County Board Chair, City Mayor, Executive Director): I am pleased to inform you that Contra Costa County has received state and federal authorization to proceed with a collaborative planning process regarding the future State Route 239, which will link eastern Contra Costa County with San Joaquin County. On behalf of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, I would like to invite you to work with us on planning this important multi-county transportation corridor. SR 239 has been listed as a future state highway for decades, but no planning has yet been done to determine the route’s alignment or characteristics. Contra Costa County has experienced significant growth in traffic between eastern Contra Costa and the Tracy area, particularly in terms of commercial truck traffic, but we lack the road system to handle it. There only are two roads linking eastern Contra Costa County with San Joaquin County – Byron Highway and State Route 4 through the Delta -- and they are both rural undivided two-lane roads. To address the problem Contra Costa County applied for and received federal funds totaling $14 million to work on a multi-county planning process for SR 239 that will involve local jurisdictions and transportation agencies as well as Caltrans’ Bay Area and San Joaquin regional offices. The process will be truly collaborative with all jurisdictions working as equal partners. This will provide us the opportunity to work together to determine an appropriate alignment for State Route 239, how many lanes it should have, how it will fit with the land use and growth policies of the cities and counties along the way, and other important factors. We will contact your staff in the very near future to discuss the process in more detail. In the meantime, if you have questions, please feel free to contact me. I look forward to working with you on this long-awaited highway project. Sincerely, Supervisor Mary N. Piepho District III