HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02121985 - IO.1 yo
TO: .43OARD OF SUPERVISORS
Contra
FROM: Internal Operations Committee
Costa C
DATE: February 11 , 1985 County
"Y
SUBJECT: Direct Consumer Appointments to the
Mental Health Advisory Board
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1 . Designate two of the consumer seats on the Mental Health Advisory Board as "Direct
Consumer" seats.
2. For purposes of one of the Direct Consumer seats on the Mental Health Advisory Board,
define Direct Consumer as: "an individual who is a resident of Contra Costa County
and who has had repeated contact with the public mental health system of Contra Costa
County, including, but not limited to, 24-hour services". One of the Direct Consumer
appointments to the Mental Health Advisory Board shall meet this definition.
3. The other Direct Consumer appointment to the Mental Health Advisory Board shall meet
the following definition: "an individual who is a resident of Contra Costa County
who has received mental health services from a city or county Short-Doyle program,
or any of its contract agencies, a state hospital , or any public or private non-
profit mental health agency".
4. Authorize the Mental Health Advisory Board to advertise for, screen, and nominate to
the Internal Operations Committee individuals for appointment to the two currently
vacant consumer seats on the Mental Health Advisory Board which are hereafter
designated as "Direct Consumer" seats. The Mental Health Advisory Board is to complete
its screening and nomination process by March 28 and is to forward its recommendations,
along with the applications of all applicants for these seats, to the Internal
Operations Committee, which will consider the Mental Health Advisory Board's
recommendations on April 8, 1985.
BACKGROUND:
On December 4, 1984, the Board directed the Health Services Director, or his designee, to
meet with the Mental Health Advisory Board and all other organizations that have expressed
an interest in having a direct consumer of mental health services on the Mental Health
Advisory Board in order to develop a consensus on a definition of "direct consumer", and
to determine whether one or two seats should be reserved for a "direct consumer".
The Chair of the Mental Health Advisory Board has forwarded our Committee a letter dated
February 4, 1985 recommending that two seats be reserved for direct consumers and
proposing definitions for each of the direct consumer seats. On February 11 , our Committee
met with the Chair of the Mental Health Advisory Board, staff from the Health Services
Department, the Executive Director of the Mental Health Association, and several mental
health consumer advocates. It was clear that a consensus had been worked out which is
acceptable to all parties. One of the consumer advocates expressed the hope that
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
.X_APPROVE OT ER
-71
SIGNATURES) Tjm Torl akson T m Powers
ACTION OF BOARD ON February 12, 19=5 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) i HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AYES: NOES: AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
County Administrator OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Health Services Director
CC: Sod
Asst. Director--Mental Health ATTESTED
Chair, MHAB PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
Auditor SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Patients' Rights .
Mse2/�-es BY DEPUTY
-2-
eventually three consumer seats would be dedicated to direct consumers with
two of the seats dedicated to individuals who meet the definition in
recommendation No. 2 above and one of whom would meet the definition in
recommendation No. 3 above. There were also expressions of concern about the
length of time the recruitment and screening process might take. We reached
general agreement on the timeframe outlined above under which our Committee
will receive and consider the recommendations of the Mental Health Advisory Board
on April 8, 1985. We, therefore, recommend approval of the above recommendations.