The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 06112019 - (2)CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES GOVERNED BY THE BOARD BOARD CHAMBERS ROOM 107, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 651 PINE STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-1229 JOHN GIOIA, CHAIR, 1ST DISTRICT CANDACE ANDERSEN, VICE CHAIR, 2ND DISTRICT DIANE BURGIS, 3RD DISTRICT KAREN MITCHOFF , 4TH DISTRICT FEDERAL D. GLOVER, 5TH DISTRICT DAVID J. TWA, CLERK OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, (925) 335-1900 PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES. A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR. The Board of Supervisors respects your time, and every attempt is made to accurately estimate when an item may be heard by the Board. All times specified for items on the Board of Supervisors agenda are approximate. Items may be heard later than indicated depending on the business of the day. Your patience is appreciated. ANNOTATED AGENDA & MINUTES June 11, 2019 9:00 A.M. Convene and announce adjournment to closed session in Room 101. Closed Session A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Gov. Code § 54957.6) 1. Agency Negotiators: David Twa and Richard Bolanos. Employee Organizations: Public Employees Union, Local 1; AFSCME Locals 512 and 2700; California Nurses Assn.; SEIU Locals 1021 and 2015; District Attorney Investigators’ Assn.; Deputy Sheriffs Assn.; United Prof. Firefighters I.A.F.F., Local 1230; Physicians’ & Dentists’ Org. of Contra Costa; Western Council of Engineers; United Chief Officers Assn.; Contra Costa County Defenders Assn.; Contra Costa County Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; Prof. & Tech. Engineers IFPTE, Local 21; and Teamsters Local 856. 2. Agency Negotiators: David Twa. Unrepresented Employees: All unrepresented employees. B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov. Code § 54956.9(d)(1)) Jamie Bailey v. Contra Costa County, WCAB Nos. ADJ6564916; ADJ96419631. County of San Joaquin, et al. v. Department of Water Resources, et al., Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 34-2017-80002677 2. California Department of Water Resources v. All Persons Interested in the Matter, etc., Sacramento County Superior Court Case No. 34-2017-00215965 3. Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District v. Gary A. Eames, et al., Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. C15-02052 4. Amir Allison, et al. v. Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, et al.; Contra Costa County Superior Court, Case No. C17-02342 5. 9:30 A.M. Call to order and opening ceremonies. Inspirational Thought- "If you are always trying to be normal you will never know how amazing you can be." ~Maya Angelou Present: John Gioia, District I Supervisor; Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor; Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor; Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor; Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Staff Present:David Twa, County Administrator CONSIDER CONSENT ITEMS (Items listed as C.1 through C.178 on the following agenda) – Items are subject to removal from Consent Calendar by request of any Supervisor or on request for discussion by a member of the public. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be considered with the Discussion Items. Consent items adopted with the exception of C.7, C.41, and C.172. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover PRESENTATIONS (5 Minutes Each) PRESENTATION recognizing May 2019 as Older Americans month and June 2019 as Elder and Dependent Adults Abuse Awareness month in Contra Costa County. (Laura Cepoi, Area Agency on Aging Program Manager and Michelle Bleke, Aging and Adult Protective Services Division Manager) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover PRESENTATION recognizing CourAGE. (Supervisor Andersen) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover PR.3 PRESENTATION of the “People Who Make a Difference Awards 2019," acknowledging those who have significantly contributed towards reducing substance abuse in Contra Costa communities. (Fatima Matal Sol, Health Services Department) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover DISCUSSION ITEMS D. 1 CONSIDER Consent Items previously removed. C.7 & C.41 discussed and received public comment. C.7 adopted as presented. C.41 adopted as presented. C.172 pulled to return at a future meeting. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 2 PUBLIC COMMENT (2 Minutes/Speaker) Public speakers: Jim Dexter, Mitchel Smith, Greg Montes D. 3 CONSIDER approving and authorizing the extension of temporary employment of retiree Olga Adams through June 30, 2020; and FIND that the appointment of this retiree is necessary to fill a critically needed position in the Health Services Department. (Anna Roth, Health Services Director) Approved the extension through December 31, 2019. Directed Health Services to coordinate with Human Resources to explore creating a new employment classification, and to report to the Board of Supervisors at a future meeting with a plan to address issues, including the lack of automation of payroll health services. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 4 HEARING on the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on service charges in County Service Area D. 4 HEARING on the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on service charges in County Service Area M-28 (Willow Mobile Home Park Water District) and adoption of Resolution No. 2019/132 confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges specified in the report, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Bethel Island area. (100% County Service Area M-28 Funds) (Rochelle Johnson, Public Works Department) Received from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on service charges in County Service Area (CSA) M-28. Opened the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; received and considered all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and closed the public hearing. Considered whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated service charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Approved the estimated service charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Adopted Resolution No. 2019/132, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. Directed the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Final Annual Report for CSA M-28 that conforms to the County’s official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area M-28 Funds) (District III) Project No. 7473-6X9E70. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 5 HEARING on the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in County Service Area M-30 (Alamo Springs) and adoption of Resolution No. 2019/134 confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges specified in the report, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville area. (100% County Service Area M-30 Funds) (Rochelle Johnson, Public Works Department) Received from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in County Service Area (CSA) M-30. Opened the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; received and considered all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and CLOSE the public hearing. Considered whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated assessment charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Approved the estimated assessment charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Adopted Resolution No. 2019/134, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. Directed the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Final Annual Report for CSA M-30 that conforms to the County’s official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area M-30 Funds) (District II) Project No. 7499-6X5491. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 6 HEARING on the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in County Service Area M-31 (Contra Costa Centre Transit Village) and adoption of Resolution No. 2019/135 confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges specified in the report, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Pleasant Hill BART area. (100% County Service Area M-31 Funds) (Rochelle Johnson, Public Works Department) Received from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in County Service Area (CSA) M-31. Opened the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; received and considered all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and closed the public hearing. Considered whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated assessment charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Approved the estimated assessment charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Adopted Resolution No. 2019/135, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. Directed the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Final Annual Report for CSA M-31 that conforms to the County’s official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area M-31 Funds) (District IV) Project No. 7476-6X5195. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 7 HEARING on the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in County Service Area T-1 (Public Transit) and adoption of Resolution No. 2019/136 confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges specified in the report, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Danville area. (100% County Service Area T-1 Funds) (Rochelle Johnson, Public Works Department) Received from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in County Service Area (CSA) T-1. Opened the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; received and considered all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and closed the public hearing. Considered whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated assessment charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Approved the estimated assessment charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Adopted Resolution No. 2019/136, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. Directed the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Final Annual Report for CSA T-1 that conforms to the County’s official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area T-1 Funds) (District III) Project No. 7480-6X5058. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 8 HEARING to levy assessments in Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) Fiscal Year 2019-20, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. (100% Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) Funds) (Carl Roner, Public Works Department) Opened the public hearing; received and considered public comments and protests; closed the public hearing. Accepted the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Final Engineer’s Report for Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2). Adopted Resolution No. 2019/167 confirming the diagram, assessment roll, and assessments set forth in the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Final Engineer’s Report for Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2), and Directed the Auditor-Controller to place the levy of annual assessments on the tax roll for Fiscal Year 2019-20. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 9 HEARING on the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on service charges in County Service Area L-100 (Countywide Street Lighting) and adoption of Resolution No. 2019/131 confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges specified in the report, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. (100% County Service Area L-100 Funds) (Rochelle Johnson, Public Works Department) Received from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on service charges in County Service Area (CSA) L-100. Opened the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; received and considered all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and closed the public hearing. Considered whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated service charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Approved the estimated service charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Adopted Resolution No. 2019/131, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. Directed the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Final Annual Report for CSA L-100 that conforms to the County's official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area L-100 Funds) (Countywide) Project No. 7394-6X5001. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.10 RECEIVE updated presentation from the interdepartmental Illegal Dumping Think Tank team and CONSIDER approving final recommendations on a program to better address illegal dumping and CONSIDER allocating $378,000 for implementation of the recommended strategies that are not already covered by existing budgets. (John Kopchik, Conservation and Development Director) Approved all staff recommendations, referred implementation of the recommendations to a new Ad Hoc Committee composed of Supervisors Burgis and Glover and directed staff to report back by Sep 30 with a proposal to authorize the expenditure of funds to implement the recommendations and with status of enforcing mandatory subscription ordinance and other recommendations. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.11 CONSIDER accepting a report on the federal advocacy services contract procurement process and DIRECT staff as appropriate. (David Twa, County Administrator) Public comment: Michael Esposito Rejected the recommendation of the County Selection Committee, extended the current contract with Alcalde & Fay for the period of July 1, 2019-June 30, 2020. Referred the item back to the Legislation Committee for its July meeting, with a request to return to the Board of Supervisors at a future date. D.12 CONSIDER adopting Resolution No. 2019/461, approving a side letter agreement, ratified on June 5, 2019, between Contra Costa County and Teamsters Local 856 to revise Section 19 - Medical, Dental, & Life Insurance of the current Memorandum of Understanding (July 1, 2016 - June 30, 2022). (David Twa, County Administrator) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.13 CONSIDER authorizing a waiver of Assessor fees relating to acquiring Secured Assessment Roll and Property Characteristics data for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission/Association of Bay Area Governments, approving Appropriations Adjustment No. 005089 transferring appropriations in the amount of $19,700 from the County's Contingency Reserve (0990) to the Assessor's Office (0016) to defray the costs of providing this data, and requesting the Assessor's Office to provide the requested information as soon as possible. (Supervisors Mitchoff and Glover) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 14 CONSIDER reports of Board members. Supervisor Burgis attended an FAA conference in Baltimore Supervisor Mitchoff attended a Governors conference on wildfires and other disasters Supervisor Mitchoff and Supervisor Glover attended a roundtable on infrastructure needs and improvements. Closed Session ADJOURN in memory of Sharon Marsh Brentwood-Byron Knightsen Union Cemetery District Trustee Adjourned meeting at 12:59 p.m. CONSENT ITEMS Road and Transportation C. 1 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $250,000 to provide on-call civil engineering services for the period June 11, 2019 through May 7, 2022, Countywide. (100% Developer Fees and Local Road, Flood Control, and Airport Enterprise Funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 2 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $250,000 to provide on-call structural engineering services for the period June 11, 2019 through May 7, 2022, Countywide. (100% Developer Fees and Local Road, Flood Control, and Airport Enterprise Funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 3 ADOPT Traffic Resolution No. 2019/4483 to prohibit stopping, parking, or standing of vehicles at all times on the south side of Olympic Boulevard (Road No. 3441), beginning at a point 36 feet west of the centerline of Panoramic Way (Road No. 3845BE) and extending westerly a distance of 22 feet; and RESCIND Traffic Resolution Nos. 1243 and 3566, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. (No Fiscal Impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 4 APPROVE the conveyance of 6,547 square feet of property no longer needed for highway purposes to Gurshamjeet Cheema (APN 068-132-049), Premnauth and Uma Persaud (APN 068-132-024), and Susan E. Taber, trustee (APN 068-132-048), near A Street and Bryan Avenue, in Antioch, in connection with the State Route 4 Widening, Loveridge Road to SR160, Segment 3A project, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Antioch area. (100% Contra Costa Transportation Authority Funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 5 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair, Board of Supervisors, to execute a grant deed conveying to the City of San Pablo surplus real property, in connection with the I-80 San Pablo Dam Road Interchange Project, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Pablo area. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 6 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/188 authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute Right of Way Certifications required for state and federally funded road projects, and DIRECT the Principal Real Property Agent to provide a copy of the Resolution to the appropriate office of the California Department of Transportation, Countywide. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 7 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/193 approving the submission of a claim to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to seek Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Transportation Development Act funding in the amount of $1,049,500 for bicycle and pedestrian projects sponsored by the County and the cities of Concord, Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Oakley, Orinda, Pittsburg, Pleasant Hill, San Pablo, and San Ramon, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. (100% Transportation Development Act, Article 3 Funds) Public comment: Nicholas Waranoff Attached written comments Adopted as presented. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Engineering Services C. 8 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/175 approving the annual county miles in the Total Maintained Mileage for County Roads Report, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 9 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/185 approving reduction of performance bond amount for the Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS15-00002 for a project developed by Alamo Glen, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (100% Developer Fees) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Special Districts & County Airports C. 10 APPROVE and ADOPT the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program for County Airports. (100% Federal Aviation Administration Funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 11 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, or designee, to partner with the State of California Coastal Conservancy to apply for grant assistance in the form of the National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant Program, in the amount of $1,000,000, for partial implementation of the North Reach of the Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project, Martinez area. (100% Flood Control District Zone 3B Funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 12 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/189 authorizing the Chief Engineer, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, or designee, to apply, accept, and execute grant agreements and related amendments with the California Department of Water Resources for the Wildcat Creek Fish Passage and Community Engagement project, North Richmond area. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Claims, Collections & Litigation C. 13 DENY claims filed by Ernesto Balderramos, Elijah Dominguez (3), Peter Doppe, Cornelius Green, Jose P. Huayllasco, Jesus Jauregui, Nickolas Jessup, Carlos Luquin, the estate of Yuenwah, Tanglo, Eddie Thomas Jr. and Dejanae Marshay Malone-McFarland, Edward L. Turner, and Sun Shui Wong. DENY amended claim filed by Robin Stumps. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 14 RECEIVE report concerning the final settlement of Guy Worth vs. Contra Costa County; and AUTHORIZE C. 14 RECEIVE report concerning the final settlement of Guy Worth vs. Contra Costa County; and AUTHORIZE payment from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund in an amount not to exceed $400,000, as recommended by the Interim Risk Manager. (100% Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Honors & Proclamations C. 15 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/156 recognizing the month of May 2019 as Older Americans Month in Contra Costa County, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 16 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/186 honoring Deputy Sheriff William R. Johnson who died in the line of duty on July 31, 1852, as recommended by the Sheriff-Coroner. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 17 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/201 honoring Dr. Colleen Dowd on the occasion of her retirement from Walnut Acres Elementary School, as recommended by Supervisor Mitchoff. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 18 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/458 recognizing June 2019 as Elder and Dependent Abuse Awareness Month, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Ordinances C. 19 ADOPT Ordinance No. 2019-18 amending the County Ordinance Code to exclude from the Merit System the classification of Deputy Director of Health Services – Exempt. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 20 INTRODUCE Ordinance No. 2019-17 to exempt accessory dwelling units approved under a ministerial permit from payment of certain transportation impact mitigation fees; WAIVE reading; and FIX June 18, 2019 for adoption. (100% Local Road Funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 21 ADOPT Ordinance No. 2019-19 to repeal Ordinance No. 2019-13, which had authorized a special tax for police protection services in County Service Area P-2, Zone A, Blackhawk area, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appointments & Resignations C. 22 ACCEPT the resignation of David Dolter, DECLARE a vacancy in the Appointee 6 Seat on the Alamo Police Services Advisory Committee, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, for a term with an expiration date of December 31, 2020, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 23 REAPPOINT Richard Bell to the District I seat of the Family & Children's Trust Committee, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 24 ADOPT Resolution 2019/180 to appoint Supervisor John Gioia as the Board of Supervisors' representative, and Supervisor Federal D. Glover as the Board's alternate representative, to the Marin Energy Authority (MCE) Board of Directors and to update the Master List of Board Member appointments for 2019, as recommended by Supervisor Gioia. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 25 APPOINT Doria Robinson to the Environmental Justice seat, Howdy Goudey to the Community Group #2, Russell Driver to the Business Group #1 seat, and Nick Snyder to the Business Group #2 seat of the Sustainability Commission, and AUTHORIZE all appointments to the Sustainability Commission to extend 60 days past the stated term of service, or until a new appointment is made, whichever occurs sooner, as recommended by the Sustainability Committee. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 26 REAPPOINT Kimberly McCarl to the Private/Non-Profit Sector 2 seat, Monisha Merchant to Private/Non-profit Sector 4 seat, Samuel Houston to Low-Income Sector 1, and Devlyn Sewell to the Private/Non-Profit Sector 5 seat on the Economic Opportunity Council, with term end date of June 30, 2021, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 27 ACCEPT resignation of Rita Xavier and Branin Cook from the Advisory Council on Aging, DECLARE vacancies in the member-at-Large 9 Seat and Local Committee Oakley Seat, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancies as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 28 REAPPOINT Eizo Kobayashi to the District IV seat of the Contra Costa County Merit Board, as recommended by Supervisor Mitchoff. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 29 ACCEPT the resignation of Miguel Hidalgo-Barnes, DECLARE vacant the Council on Homelessness Behavioral Health Representative seat, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by the Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division Director. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 30 APPOINT Renee Fernandez-Lipp to the Director 3 seat on the Contra Costa Resource Conservation District C. 30 APPOINT Renee Fernandez-Lipp to the Director 3 seat on the Contra Costa Resource Conservation District Board of Directors, as recommended by the County Administrator. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 31 ACCEPT the resignation of Kelly Stieler, DECLARE vacant the District I Consumer Representative Seat on the Emergency Medical Care Committee, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by the Health Services Director. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 32 ACCEPT the resignation of Aron DeFerrari, DECLARE a vacancy in the Appointee 2 Seat on the Alamo Municipal Advisory Council, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, for a term with an expiration date of December 31, 2020, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 33 DECLARE vacant the Trustee 1 seat on the Byron-Brentwood-Knightsen Union Cemetery District and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 34 APPROVE the medical staff appointments and reappointments, additional privileges, advancements, and voluntary resignations as recommend by the Medical Staff Executive Committee and the Health Services Director. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 35 ACCEPT the resignation of Chris Gallagher, DECLARE vacant the Appointee 2 seat on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 36 ACCEPT the resignation of William Marz, DECLARE vacant the Appointee 7 seat on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 37 ACCEPT the resignation of Ronald Cortez, DECLARE vacant the Appointee 6 seat on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 38 ACCEPT the resignation of Ron Banducci, DECLARE vacant the Appointee 4 seat on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 39 ACCEPT the resignation of Henry Schultzel, DECLARE vacant the Appointee 3 seat on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Burgis. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appropriation Adjustments C. 40 Agriculture/Weights and Measures (0335): APPROVE Appropriations and Revenue Adjustment No.005086 to increase revenue in the amount of $850,697 from Unclaimed Gas Tax and contract agreement revenues, and decrease contract agreement revenues in the amount of $70,000 and appropriate $780,697 in expenditures supported by revenue increases. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Intergovernmental Relations C. 41 ADOPT advocacy positions on the following state bills: ACA 1 (Aguiar-Curry), AB 388 (Limon), SB 409 (Wilk), SB 276 (Pan), AB 1544 (Gipson), AB 1487 (Chiu), and SB 438 (Hertzberg), as recommended by the Legislation Committee. Public comment: Chris Farnitano, MD Adopted as presented. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover NO: District II Supervisor Candace Andersen Personnel Actions C. 42 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22099 to establish the class of Library Services Manager (unrepresented) position, allocate it to the Salary Schedule, and add one position; and cancel one Virtual Library Manager position in the Library Department and abolish the class of Virtual Library Manager (represented). (100% Library Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 43 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22444 to reassign one Secretary-Journey Level vacant (represented) position from the Workforce Services Bureau to the Administrative Support Services Bureau, in the Employment and Human Services Department. (42% Federal, 53% State, 5% County) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 44 ACKNOWLEDGE the Human Resources Director has authorized suspension of competition for the classifications of Mental Health Community Support Worker I (represented) and Mental Health Community Support Worker II (represented) in the Health Services Department, pursuant to Personnel Management Regulations Section 502. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 45 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22466 to add one Account Clerk-Experienced Level C. 45 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22466 to add one Account Clerk-Experienced Level (represented) position and cancel one Office Manager (represented) position in the Public Works Department. (Cost Savings) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 46 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No.22467 to add one Administrative Services Assistant II (represented) position and cancel one Community and Media Relations Specialist (represented) position in the Public Works Department. (Cost savings) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 47 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22474 to add one Director, Public Health Clinic Services position (represented) and cancel one vacant Director, Family, Material & Child Health position (represented) in the Health Services Department. (75% Federal Financial Participation, 25% County General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 48 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22448 to add one Building Plan Checker I (represented) position in the Department of Conservation and Development. (100% Land Development Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 49 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22470 to cancel one vacant Health Plan Nurse Program Director position (represented) and add one Utilization Review Manager position (represented) in the Health Services Department. (Cost neutral) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 50 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22471 to cancel one vacant Health Planner/Evaluator B position (represented) and add one Research and Evaluation Manager position (represented) in the Health Services Department. (100% Continuum of Care Planning grant) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 51 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22475 to add one Substance Abuse Counselor position (represented), one Substance Abuse Lead Counselor position (represented), and one Mental Health Clinical Specialist position (represented) in the Alcohol and Other Drugs Services program of Health Service Department. (100% Employment and Human Services Department) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 52 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22476 to add one Homeless Services Specialist (represented), one Community Health Worker Specialist (represented), one Medical Social Worker I (represented), and two Public Health Nurse (represented) positions in the Whole Person Care/Community Connect program of the Health Services Department. (100% Whole Person Care Grant) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 53 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22473 to add one Senior Disease Intervention Technician (represented) position in the Health Services Department. (75% State, 20% AIDS prevention Education, 5% Ryan White funding) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 54 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/198 to grant an exception to Contra Costa County Salary Regulations and to provide an upward salary step adjustment of the incumbent in the classification of Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt effective at date of promotion June 3, 2019, as requested by the District Attorney. (100% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 55 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/197 to grant an exception to Contra Costa County Salary Regulations and to provide an upward salary step adjustment of the incumbent in the classification of Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt, effective at date of promotion June 3, 2019, as requested by the District Attorney. (100% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover LEASES C. 56 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a lease with Center Point, Inc., for approximately 2,500 square feet of rentable office space at 1515 Market Avenue, San Pablo, at the rate of $1,500 a month for six months (80% Medi-Cal, 14% AB 109, 6% Substance Abuse Block Grant Funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Grants & Contracts APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreements between the County and the following agencies for receipt of fund and/or services: C. 57 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Information Officer, Department of Information Technology, to execute a contract with the City of Richmond to provide the City radio communication services by the County’s Department of Information Technology at a rate of $134.50 per hour for County staff time, plus costs incurred, for the period July 1, 2019 until terminated. (100% County General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 58 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute an agreement and accept reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $4,500 from The Center for Natural Land Management for the provision of noxious weed control services in Windermere Preserve located in San Ramon for the period April 1, 2019 through September 30, 2019. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 59 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Food and Agriculture to reimburse the County in an amount not to exceed $24,377 to place and service traps for the detection of the European Grapevine Moth for the period January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 60 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute a contract with the C. 60 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Food and Agriculture to reimburse the County in an amount not to exceed $14,550 for enforcement of service station laws for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 61 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute a contract with the California Department of Food and Agriculture to accept reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $3,120 for the inspection and compliance monitoring of recycling establishments licensed as weighmasters for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 62 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the City of Concord, to increase the amount payable to the County by $75,472 for a new amount not to exceed $203,986 and to extend the termination date from June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2020, for the Coordinated Outreach, Referral and Engagement Program to continue providing homeless outreach services to Concord and Walnut Creek. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 63 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the California Department of Community Services and Development to increase the amount payable to the County by $20,385 for a total amount not to exceed $3,723,075 for Low Income Home Energy Assistance Programs, with no change to the term October 1, 2018 through June 30, 2020. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 64 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language, with John Muir Health to pay the County an amount not to exceed $50,000 for respite care services for homeless adults provided at the Philip Dorn Respite Center for the period May 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 65 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with the Special Investigator General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP), including modified indemnification language, for use of the Sheriff's Range Facility commencing with execution of the contract through June 30, 2020. (100% User Fee revenue) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 66 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/187 approving the application to the California Natural Resources Agency to obtain Green Infrastructure Program grant funds under the State of California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018 (Proposition 68), as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Pablo area. (98% California Natural Resources Agency Proposition 68, 1% County Service Area M-17, 1% Flood Control and Water Conservation District Funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 67 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing C. 67 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language with the California Department of Public Health, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $2,532,688 to provide residents of Contra Costa County access to medical and support care services including outreach and treatment under the HIV Care Program and Minority AIDS Initiative Project for the period April 1, 2019 through March 31, 2024. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 68 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, to pay County an amount not to exceed $625,000 for the continuation of the Family Practice Residency Program at Contra Costa Regional Medical and Health Centers for the period June 30, 2019 through June 29, 2022. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 69 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to accept a grant in an amount not to exceed $25,000 from the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development to provide outreach, advising, and training to current and aspiring business owners for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% County Keller Canyon Mitigation Trust Fund, no County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 70 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/192 to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with California Department of Aging to increase the payment limit by $21,445 to a new payment limit of $110,279 to receive additional funding for Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act services, for the period October 1, 2018 through September 29, 2020. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 71 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language with the County of Alameda, to pay County an amount not to exceed $1,848,177 for coordination of essential services to Contra Costa County residents with HIV disease and their families for the period March 1, 2019 through February 29, 2020. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 72 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/194 authorizing the Health Services Director, or designee, to apply for and execute a grant award agreement for second round funding including any extensions or amendments thereof, pursuant to State guidelines, with the California Department of Housing and Community Development in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000 for the California Emergency Solutions and Housing Program. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 73 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to submit an application, along with necessary assurances and certifications to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for 2018 Continuum of Care funding, in an amount not to exceed $13,857,604, to provide supportive housing and services to homeless individuals and their families in Contra Costa County for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (No County match) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 74 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/454 approving and authorizing the District Attorney, or designee, to execute a C. 74 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/454 approving and authorizing the District Attorney, or designee, to execute a contract, including any extensions or amendments thereof pursuant to state guidelines, with the California Victim Witness Compensation and Government Claims Board in an amount not to exceed $447,552 to fund Victim Witness Assistance Program Specialist positions for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. (100% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreement between the County and the following parties as noted for the purchase of equipment and/or services: C. 75 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board, to execute a contract amendment with DXC Technology Company, LLC to increase the payment limit by $3,811,856 for a total contract payment limit of $26,923,367 and extend the contract period from January 31, 2020 to January 31, 2023 to provide system support, operation, and maintenance of the California Works Information Network (CalWIN) System, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. (4.35% County, 53.38% Federal, 42.27% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 76 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to enter into worksite contractual/financial agreements, not to exceed a cumulative payment limit of $960,666, with employers participating in the CCWORKS Subsidized Employment Program, whereby participating employers are reimbursed no more than $13 per hour (and no more than $20 per hour if employer pays above minimum wage) for those CalWORKs clients placed with the employers, for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (85% Federal, 15% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 77 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to enter into worksite contractual/financial agreements, not to exceed a cumulative payment of $857,533, with employers participating in the Expanded CCWORKS Subsidized Employment Program, whereby participating employers are reimbursed no more than $13 per hour (and no more than $20 per hour if employer pays above minimum wage), for targeted CalWORKS clients placed with employers during the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (96% Federal, 4% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 78 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute a contract with Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, d/b/a Empower Retirement, and to sign the Trust Agreement between Contra Costa County and Great-West Trust Company, LLC, for recordkeeping and administrative services for the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan for a three year term commencing on or after July 1, 2019, with two additional one year renewal options. (100% Employee participant fees) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 79 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a nonfinancial contract containing modified indemnification language with 1st Northern California Credit Union, a nonprofit corporation, to provide auto loan services for the Keeping Employment Equals Your Success (KEYS) Auto Loan Program, for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 80 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a C. 80 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with First Baptist Church of Pittsburg, California in an amount not to exceed $2,202,788 for Head Start Delegate Agency childcare services for the period January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. (100% Federal) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 81 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, or designee, to pay $22,256 to Friendly Cab Company, Inc. for providing additional non-emergency taxi cab transportation services for Public Health clients and patients to and from medical appointments, checkups, wellness checkups, and mental health appointments, for the period November 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019. (100% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 82 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute an agreement containing modified indemnification language with the Regents of the University of California in an amount not to exceed $56,000 for the Regents of the University of California to provide Master Gardener Program Coordinator services for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020.(100% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 83 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a novation contract with NAMI Contra Costa in an amount not to exceed $618,000 to provide a Family Volunteer Network Program to support families, significant others, and loved ones of consumers experiencing mental health issues for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, including a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2020, in an amount not to exceed $309,000. (100% Mental Health Services Act) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 84 ACKNOWLEDGE receipt of notice from Gastroenterology Associates of the East Bay Medical Group, Inc., requesting termination of contract #27-992 for provision of gastroenterology services for Contra Costa Health Plan members and County recipients, effective end of business on April 16, 2019. (100% Contra Costa Enterprise Fund II) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 85 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Muir Orthopaedic Specialists, A Medical Group, Inc., to include the provision of urgent care services in addition to orthopedic surgery services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members with no change to the payment limit of $4,000,000 or the contract term of November 1, 2018 through October 31, 2019. (100% CCHP member premiums) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 86 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Probation Officer, or designee, to execute a contract with Behavioral Interventions (B.I.), Incorporated, in the amount of $275,000 to provide electronic monitoring services and equipment for the period February 1, 2019 through January 31, 2022. (100% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 87 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Waters Moving and Storage, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 to provide on-call moving and storage services for the period June 11, 2019 through May 31, 2022, Countywide. (100% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 88 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Animal Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Bronwyn Purcell-DeAbreu, DVM, dba Veterinary Medicine Services, in an amount not to exceed $125,000, for veterinarian shelter services from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (37% User fees, 54% City revenues, 9% County General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 89 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Yana Rebecca Wirengard, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $400,000 to provide general surgery services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 90 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Sanjay K. Shah, M.D., Inc., in an amount not to exceed $900,000 to provide cardiology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period June 1, 2019 through May 31, 2021. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 91 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Stephen Arnold, M.D., to decrease the payment limit by $200,000 for a new payment limit of $1,402,000, to provide fewer cardiology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center for the period March 1, 2017 through February 29, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 92 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Denis Mahar, M.D., to decrease the payment limit by $25,000 for a new payment limit of $1,851,000 to provide fewer cardiology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center for the period October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2019. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 93 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Bailey T. Lee, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $376,000 to provide radiology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 94 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with JWG Consulting, LLC, a limited liability company, in an amount not to exceed $580,000 to provide consulting services including technical, operational support and training on Patient Financial Services to the Department’s Information Systems Unit for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 95 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with K.B.R., C. 95 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with K.B.R., Inc. (dba Rash Curtis & Associates), in an amount not to exceed $450,000 to receive debt collection services for unpaid accounts for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 96 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Contra Costa County Office of Education in an amount not to exceed $133,055 to provide educational support services and liaison services between Contra Costa County schools and Children and Family Services for youths in foster care, for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Federal) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 97 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an agreement with Contra Costa County Office of Education, in an amount not to exceed $50,000 to provide tutoring services to children in foster care for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (70% 2011 State Realignment, 30% County) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 98 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with The West Contra Costa Youth Service Bureau, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $250,000 to provide Child Welfare Redesign Differential Response Path 2 Case Management services in East and West Contra Costa County for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 99 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with God’s Grace Caring Home, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $369,564 to provide augmented board and care services for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Mental Health Realignment) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.100 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Groupware Technology, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $424,231 for the purchase of Cisco UCS Blades and Smartnet Support Services for the period May 27, 2019 through May 26, 2022. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.101 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Groupware Technology, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $102,312 for renewal of Pure Storage maintenance and support for electronic health records for the period May 27, 2019 through May 26, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.102 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Boehm and Associates, in an amount not to exceed $150,000 to provide consulting and technical assistance on workers’ compensation laws and third-party liability recovery for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Third Party Revenues) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.103 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Groupware Technology, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $136,510 for the purchase of Pure Storage FlashArray hardware and support services for the period May 27, 2019 through May 26, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.104 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with National Research Corporation (dba NRC Health), in an amount not to exceed $175,000 to provide consulting and technical assistance regarding patient satisfaction through measurement and improvement surveys including transitional discharge calls at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.105 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Human Resources, or designee, to execute a contract with CPS HR Consulting, in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for test rental services for the period of October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2020. (100% Charges to Departments) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.106 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the Moraga-Orinda Fire Protection District in an amount not to exceed $278,244 for the Fire Protection District to provide prehospital emergency medical paramedic first responder services and emergency ambulance services for the period October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2022. (100% Measure H) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.107 APPROVE the allocation of $1,054,665 of Housing Opportunities for Persons with HIV/AIDS funds, including $210,000 to Resources for Community Development for the new construction and development of the 1313 Galindo Apartments project in Concord and $844,665 to Community Development Housing Corporation of North Richmond and Eden Housing, Inc., for the new construction and development of the Legacy Court project in Richmond, as recommended by the Conservation and Development Director. (100% Federal funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.108 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language with Genomic Health Inc., in an amount not to exceed $150,000 to provide diagnostic laboratory testing services for Contra Costa Health Plan members for the period June 1, 2019 through May 31, 2021. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.109 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the City of El Cerrito in an amount not to exceed $333,036 for the El Cerrito Fire Department to provide first responder fire paramedic services within the City of El Cerrito and the Kensington Fire Protection District for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. (100% Measure H) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.110 Acting as the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and the Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director and the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Chief, or designees, to execute a contract in an amount not to exceed $4,601,166 for the Fire Protection District to provide prehospital emergency medical first responder services for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. (100% Measure H) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.111 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the City of Pinole in an amount not to exceed $148,311 for the Pinole Fire Department to provide first responder fire paramedic services within the City of Pinole for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. (100% Measure H) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.112 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the Rodeo-Hercules Fire Protection District, in an amount not to exceed $264,012 for the Fire Protection District to provide first responder fire paramedic services within the City of Hercules and the unincorporated area of Rodeo for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. (100% Measure H) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.113 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the East Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, in an amount not to exceed $678,375 for the Fire Protection District to provide prehospital emergency medical first responder services for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. (100% Measure H) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.114 Acting as the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and the Governing Board of the Crockett-Carquinez Fire District Board, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director and the Fire Chief, or designees, to execute a contract in an amount not to exceed $21,189 for the Fire Protection District to provide first responder emergency medical services for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. (100% Measure H) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.115 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with the City of Richmond in an amount not to exceed $669,066 for the Richmond Fire Department to provide prehospital emergency medical first responder services for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. (100% Measure H) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.116 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Oakland Private Industry Council, Inc., a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $165,549 to provide administrative and operational support to the East Bay Regional Planning Unit as defined by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act for the period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Federal) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.117 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Public Health Foundation Enterprise, to increase the payment limit by $1,042,539 for a new payment limit of $6,055,539, to provide additional emergency shelter and respite services for homeless youth and adults for the period July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. (31% Federal, 48% State, 11% City grants, 3% Employment and Human Services Department, 2% Private grants, and 5% County General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.118 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Psynergy Programs, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $179,242 to provide residential and mental health services to adults diagnosed with serious mental illness and serious persistent mental illness for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (56% Federal Medi-Cal, 44% Mental Health Services Act) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.119 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Telecare Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,815,818 to provide gero-psychiatric services and subacute mental health care services to severely and persistently mentally ill clients for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (75% Mental Health Realignment, 20% Hospital Enterprise Fund I, 5% County General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.120 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language with John Muir Behavioral Health in an amount not to exceed $3,020,781 to provide inpatient psychiatric hospital services for children, adolescents and adults for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Mental Health Realignment) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.121 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language, with Helios Healthcare, LLC in an amount not to exceed $473,840 to provide sub-acute skilled nursing care services for seriously ill and neurobehavioral clients for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Mental Health Realignment) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.122 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Kermit Johnson, M.D., in an amount not to exceed $279,552 to provide outpatient psychiatric services to mentally ill adults in Central County for the period August 1, 2019 through July 31, 2020. (100% Mental Health Realignment) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.123 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Healthright 360, to extend the termination date from August 15, 2020 to August 15, 2021, with no change to the payment limit $5,300,550, to continue providing pre-arrest, at-arrest and post-arrest diversion opportunities and coordination services for Antioch residents with behavioral health issues. (89% California Board of State and Community Corrections; 11% Probation Department) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.124 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the City of Antioch, to extend the termination date from August 15, 2020 to August 15, 2021, with no change in the payment limit $167,481, to continue providing pre-arrest, at-arrest and post-arrest diversion opportunities and coordination services for Antioch residents with behavioral health issues. (100% California Board of State and Community Corrections) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.125 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Seneca Family of Agencies, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $624,000 to provide countywide Wraparound Program services to increase placement stability of children, for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (30% County, 70% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.126 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Laura Swafford, in an amount not to exceed $250,000 to provide technical support and training services for the Department’s ccLink system for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.127 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Community Violence Solutions, in an amount not to exceed $182,039 to provide Child Welfare Redesign Differential Response Path 2 Case Management services in West Contra Costa County for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.128 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language, with Elior, Inc. (dba Bateman Community Living, LLC), in an amount not to exceed $3,171,323 to provide meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, including a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2020 in an amount not to exceed $792,831. (100% Title III C-1; Title III C-2 of the Federal Older Americans Act of 1965) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.129 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Contra Costa County Office of Education in an amount not to exceed $750,000 to provide Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act year-round youth workforce development services in East and West County for the period July 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020. (100% Federal) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.130 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Lifelong Medical Care in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000 to provide primary care, urgent care and specialty medical services to Contra Costa Health Plan members for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.131 AWARD and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a construction contract with Pavement Coatings Co., in the amount of $3,403,582 for the 2019 Asphalt Rubber Cape Seal and Micro-Surface Seal Project, Lafayette, Martinez, and San Pablo areas. (10% CalRecycle Grant Funds and 90% Local Road Funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.132 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, or designee, to pay an amount not to exceed $385,191 C.132 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, or designee, to pay an amount not to exceed $385,191 to MGA Healthcare, Inc. for temporary help services, at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period December 1, 2018 through May 31, 2019. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.133 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order amendment with Tiernan-Leino Dental Laboratory, to extend the termination date from August 31, 2019 to August 31, 2020 with no change to the payment limit of $240,000 for the purchase of dental supplies and prosthetics for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers and the Martinez and West County Detention Facilities. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.134 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Goodwill Industries of the Greater East Bay, Inc., to extend the termination date from June 30, 2019 to December 31, 2019 with no change to the payment limit of $1,037,125, for continued Subsidized Temporary Experience with/without Pay for the Under-Employed Program (STEP-UP) Services. (15% State, 85% Federal) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.135 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an agreement with Chabot-Las Positas Community College District in an amount not to exceed $550,000 to deliver education and training services to foster care providers and Children and Family Services staff for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.136 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language, with J-Sei, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $30,713 to provide home-delivered meals for County’s Senior Nutrition Program for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, including a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2020, in an amount not to exceed $7,678. (100% Title III-C 2 of the Older Americans Act) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.137 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Lilliput Children’s Services, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $444,562 to provide family finding services for foster youth for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.138 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with California Psychiatric Transitions Incorporated, to increase the payment limit by $504,956 for a new payment limit of $1,826,956, for additional residential care and mental health services, with no change to the original term of September 1, 2018 through August 31, 2019. (80% Mental Health Realignment; 20% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.139 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a C.139 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Lilliput Children’s Services, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $431,051 to provide Kinship Support Services to relative caregivers of children for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.140 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Archer Business Solutions, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $145,000 to provide specialized technical support and consulting for the Health Services Department’s Information Systems Unit for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.141 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Night Owl Pediatrics (dba Night Owl Urgent Care), in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 to provide pediatric primary care and urgent care services to Contra Costa Health Plan members for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.142 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an agreement with Contra Costa Community College District - Diablo Valley College Campus in an amount not to exceed $32,400 to provide Heritage Project training for caregivers of children exposed to drugs and/or alcohol for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (75% Federal, 17.5% State, 7.5% County) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.143 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an agreement with Contra Costa Community College District – Diablo Valley College (DVC) Campus in an amount not to exceed $30,000 to provide Resource Family Pre-Approval training for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (75% Federal, 25% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.144 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Sharon de Edwards, M.D., FACOG, in an amount not to exceed $500,000, to provide obstetrics and gynecology services for Contra Costa Health Plan members for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021. (100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.145 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Contra Costa County Office of Education in an amount not to exceed $108,045 to provide educational liaison services for children in foster care for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (70% State, 30% County) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.146 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Medline Industries Inc., in an amount not to exceed $33,000,000 for medical, cleaning, and disaster supplies, and miscellaneous equipment for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period June 27, 2019 through June 26, 2022. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.147 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an agreement with Contra Costa Community College District - Contra Costa College Campus in an amount not to exceed $30,400 to provide Heritage training to enhance the health of chemically dependent women and their children for the period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (75% Federal, 17.5% State, 7.5% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.148 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order amendment with Depuy Synthes Products, Inc., to increase the payment limit by $700,000 to a new payment limit of $1,750,000 for the purchase of additional implants and orthopedic supplies and devices for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center with no change in the original term of April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.149 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order amendment with Henry Schein, Inc., to increase the payment limit by $16,000 to a new payment limit of $114,000 for the purchase of additional dental supplies and equipment for the Public Health Clinic Services Dental Program, with no change in the original term January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. (100% Federally Qualified Health Centers) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.150 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of Employment and Human Services. a blanket purchase order with East Bay Restaurant Supply for the purchase of appliances and equipment for the renovation and relocation of the Community Service Bureau Central Kitchen not to exceed $621,750 for the period June 11, 2019 through December 31, 2019. (100% Federal) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.151 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Uplift Family Services, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $539,167 to provide kinship support services to relative caregivers and the dependent children in their care in Central and West Contra Costa County for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% State) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.152 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Groupware Technology, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $620,630 for the purchase of a Cisco MDS 9706 Switch for the Health Services Department's Pittsburg Data Center. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.153 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Eighty 20 Healthcare Consulting, LLC, to increase the payment limit by $170,000 for a new payment limit of $320,000, to provide additional consultation, technical support and planning services for transitioning the West Contra Costa Health Care District to County for the period January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.154 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language, with Foley & Lardner, LLP, in an amount not to exceed $450,000 for the provision of legal services related to Medi-Cal audit appeals and other Contra Costa Health Plan appeals, report issues, and authorized litigation issues for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.155 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute a contract with Nossaman LLP in an amount not to exceed $630,000 for state advocacy services for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. (100% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.156 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Bay Area Community Services, Inc., effective June 1, 2019, to increase the payment limit by $200,000 to a new payment limit of $4,384,765 to support the transition of contract services from the original contractor, Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated, which closed effective May 31, 2019, with no change to the original term of July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, or to the automatic extension payment limit or term through December 31, 2019. (38% Federal Medi-Cal, 62% Mental Health Realignment) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.157 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Bay Area Community Services, Inc., effective June 1, 2019, to increase the payment limit by $100,000 to a new payment limit of $810,797 to support the transition of contract services from the original contractor, Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated, which closed effective May 31, 2019, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, with no change in the automatic extension payment limit or term through December 31, 2019. (80% SAMHSA, 20% PATH grant) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.158 ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/160 to facilitate disbursement of $45,302.62 in reserve funds to the County by the West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management Authority (“Authority”), APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director to execute an indemnification Agreement by and between the County and the Authority related to such disbursement, and DIRECT staff to return with a proposed plan for allocating the reserve funding. (100% West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management Authority reserve funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Other Actions C.159 ACCEPT the April 2019 update of the Employment and Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.160 RECEIVE 2018 Annual Report submitted by the Mental Health Commission, as recommended by the County Administrator. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.161 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Mt. Diablo Unified School District to provide supervised field instruction at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers to medical assistant and surgical technician students for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021. (Nonfinancial agreement) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.162 Acting as the Governing Board of the West Contra Costa Healthcare District, ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/183, approving the refunding of the District’s 2011 Certificates of Participation in the principal amount of approximately $41,000,000, approving the issuance of West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019, to refund the 2011 Certificates of Participation, and approving and authorizing the execution of related documents and other related actions, as recommended by the Health Services Director. (Cost savings) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.163 APPROVE clarification of Board action of October 23, 2018 (Item C.50), which authorized the Purchasing Agent to execute a purchase order with Steris Corporation, in the amount of $266,522 for the purchase of two V-Pro Max Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide Sterilizers for the Central Sterilization Unit at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, to reflect the correct payment amount of $267,627. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.164 AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to sign the Certification Statement for the California Children’s Services Program, as required by the State of California, as recommended by the Health Services Director. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.165 APPROVE the Storm Water Treatment – Escobar Street Parking Lot Project and take related actions under the California Environmental Quality Act, Martinez area. (100% General Funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.166 DECLARE as surplus and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to dispose of fully depreciated vehicles and equipment no longer needed for public use, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. (No fiscal impact) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.167 APPROVE allocation of fiscal year 2019/20 Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships Act and Emergency Solutions Grant programs as recommended by the Family and Human Services Committee and Conservation and Development Director; ADOPT and APPROVE the FY 2019/20 Action Plan; ADOPT and APPROVE the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice; ADOPT related California Environmental Quality Act findings; and DIRECT the Conservation and Development Director to execute related administrative actions implementing each program. (100% Federal Funds) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.168 ACCEPT the Treasurer's Quarterly Investment Report as of March 31, 2019, as recommended by the County Treasurer-Tax Collector. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.169 ACCEPT the Treasurer's Investment Policy for the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 as revised and adopted on May 21, 2019 by the Treasury Oversight Committee. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.170 RECEIVE Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1906, entitled "Protecting Children from Abuse and Neglect" (attached), and FORWARD to the County Administrator for response. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.171 ACCEPT the Industrial Safety Ordinance Annual Report submitted by the Health Services Department. (Randy Sawyer, Director of Hazardous Materials Programs) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.172 ACCEPT a grant deed conveying 13 parcels formerly owned by the Redevelopment Agency which are portions of the Iron Horse Trail Corridor, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Concord, Pleasant Hill, and Walnut Creek areas. (No fiscal impact) Pulled to return at a future meeting C.173 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, or designee, to pay Garland/DBS, Inc., in the amount of $787,991 for roofing maintenance services provided to the Public Works Department during the period July 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019, Countywide. (100% General Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.174 APPROVE amended Bylaws for the North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee, as recommended by the Committee. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.175 ACCEPT the recommendation of the Behavioral Health Services Director to adopt the Mental Health Services Act Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for Fiscal Years 2019/20; and AUTHORIZE and DIRECT the Chair of the Board to send a letter to that effect to the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (MHSOAC), to inform DHCS and the MHSOAC of their approval of the adoption of this Plan Update. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.176 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to terminate a contract with Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated, for mental health and support to adults with serious and persistent mental illness in Central Contra Costa County, effective at the close of business on May 31, 2019. AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.177 Acting as the Governing Board of the Contra Costa Housing Authority, ADOPT Resolution No. 5224 authorizing the Executive Director of the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa (HACCC) to submit an application to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the partial demolition and total disposition of Las Deltas and Las Deltas Annex I (the Property). AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C.178 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Fish and Wildlife Committee to host the 19th annual Fall Forum event for law enforcement agencies to discuss fish and wildlife conservation and enforcement of regulations in Contra Costa County and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller to release up to $2,700 from the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund to offset costs of the event, as recommended by the Fish and Wildlife Committee. (100% Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund) AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Diane Burgis, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover GENERAL INFORMATION The Board meets in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402, including as the Housing Authority and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. Persons who wish to address the Board should complete the form provided for that purpose and furnish a copy of any written statement to the Clerk. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the Clerk of the Board to a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors less than 72 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 651 Pine Street, First Floor, Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553, during normal business hours. All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Board to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Board or a member of the public prior to the time the Board votes on the motion to adopt. Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Chair calls for comments from those persons who are in support thereof or in opposition thereto. After persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and the matter is subject to discussion and action by the Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the Board of Supervisors can be submitted to the office of the Clerk of the Board via mail: Board of Supervisors, 651 Pine Street Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553; by fax: 925-335-1913. The County will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Board meetings who contact the Clerk of the Board at least 24 hours before the meeting, at (925) 335-1900; TDD (925) 335-1915. An assistive listening device is available from the Clerk, Room 106. Copies of recordings of all or portions of a Board meeting may be purchased from the Clerk of the Board. Please telephone the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 335-1900, to make the necessary arrangements. Forms are available to anyone desiring to submit an inspirational thought nomination for inclusion on the Board Agenda. Forms may be obtained at the Office of the County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California. Applications for personal subscriptions to the weekly Board Agenda may be obtained by calling the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 335-1900. The weekly agenda may also be viewed on the County’s Internet Web Page: www.co.contra-costa.ca.us STANDING COMMITTEES The Airport Committee (Supervisors Diane Burgis and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the second Wednesday of the month at 11:00 a.m. at Director of Airports Office, 550 Sally Ride Drive, Concord. The Family and Human Services Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and John Gioia) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Finance Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and John Gioia) meets on the fourth Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Federal D. Glover) meets on the first Monday of every other month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Diane Burgis and Candace Andersen) meets on the second Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Diane Burgis) meets on the second Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Public Protection Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Federal D. Glover) meets on the first Monday of the month at 10:30 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Candace Andersen) meets on the second Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. Airports Committee August 14, 2019 11:00 a.m.See above Family & Human Services Committee June 24, 2019 Canceled July 22, 2019 Canceled July 29, 2019 Special Meeting 9:00 a.m.See above Finance Committee June 24, 2019 Canceled July 22, 2019 9:00 a.m. See above Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee August 5, 2019 1:00 p.m.See above Internal Operations Committee July 8, 2019 1:00 p.m.See above Legislation Committee July 8, 2019 10:30 a.m. See above Public Protection Committee July 1, 2019 10:30 a.m. See above Sustainability Committee July 22, 2019 Canceled Special Meeting August 1, 2019 10:00 a.m.See above Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee Special Meeting July 18, 2019 1:00 p.m.See above PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR AGENDA DEADLINE: Thursday, 12 noon, 12 days before the Tuesday Board meetings. Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its Board of Supervisors meetings and written materials. Following is a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral presentations and written materials associated with Board meetings: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees AICP American Institute of Certified Planners AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BayRICS Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications System BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BGO Better Government Ordinance BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCCPFD (ConFire) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CCRMC Contra Costa Regional Medical Center CCWD Contra Costa Water District CDBG Community Development Block Grant CFDA Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CIO Chief Information Officer COLA Cost of living adjustment ConFire (CCCFPD) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CPA Certified Public Accountant CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission dba doing business as DSRIP Delivery System Reform Incentive Program EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District ECCFPD East Contra Costa Fire Protection District EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee EMS Emergency Medical Services EPSDT Early State Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Mental Health) et al. et alii (and others) FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency F&HS Family and Human Services Committee First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10) FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development HHS (State Dept of ) Health and Human Services HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome HOV High Occupancy Vehicle HR Human Resources HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development IHSS In-Home Supportive Services Inc. Incorporated IOC Internal Operations Committee ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LLC Limited Liability Company LLP Limited Liability Partnership Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1 LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse MAC Municipal Advisory Council MBE Minority Business Enterprise M.D. Medical Doctor M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist MIS Management Information System MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties NEPA National Environmental Policy Act OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology O.D. Doctor of Optometry OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PARS Public Agencies Retirement Services PEPRA Public Employees Pension Reform Act Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology RDA Redevelopment Agency RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposal RFQ Request For Qualifications RN Registered Nurse SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SEIU Service Employees International Union SUASI Super Urban Area Security Initiative SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TRE or TTE Trustee TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee UASI Urban Area Security Initiative VA Department of Veterans Affairs vs. versus (against) WAN Wide Area Network WBE Women Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee RECOMMENDATION(S): PRESENTATION of the “People Who Make a Difference Awards 2019" by members of the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable BACKGROUND: Once a year the Alcohol and other Drugs Advisory Board of Contra Costa County acknowledges both volunteer and non-volunteer individuals and groups that have significantly contributed towards reducing alcohol and other drugs in Contra Costa communities. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Fatima Matal Sol, 925-335-3307 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm, Fatima Matal Sol PR.3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:PEOPLE WHO MAKE A DIFFERENCE AWARDS 2019 ATTACHMENTS Attachment “People Who Make A Difference” “People Who Make A Difference” Awards 2019Awards 2019 The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and The Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board present Join us on Tuesday, June 11, 2019 at 9:00 A.M. for the announcement of the Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board’s “People Who Make A Difference“ Awards 2019 at the Board of Supervisors chamber at 651 Pine Street, Martinez The presentation of awards will take place in Room 108B, 651 Pine Street, Martinez Once a year the Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board acknowledges both volunteer and non-volunteer individuals and groups that have significantly contributed towards reducing substance use in our communities. Behavioral Health Division Alcohol and Other Drugs Services (AODS) Fatima Matal Sol, AODS Program Chief 1220 Morello Avenue, Suite 101, Martinez, CA 94553 YOUTH-LEADERSHIP INDIVIDUAL District V - Supervisor Federal Glover Brianna Griffin Brianna is an active member of County Wide Youth Health Coalition, otherwise known as CourAGE. She participates in the Prescription Drug Workgroup and created a youth friendly brochure discussing the dangers of prescription drug abuse/misuse and how to properly dispose of unwanted or expired medications. Brianna also attended the Martinez City Council meeting to accept a resolution declaring March as Prescription Drug Abuse Awareness Month. YOUTH LEADERSHIP INDIVIDUAL District V – Supervisor Federal Glover Rosette Tyree Representing , Rosette volunteered at the Dose of Awareness 5K Walk/Health Expo and participated for the full day. Rosette was responsible for the youth activity booth and assisted with the set up and take down of the event. Her presence, warm demeanor and leadership skills drew young people to the booth where prevention messaging was shared in a youth friendly manner. YOUTH LEADERSHIP INDIVIDUAL District V – Supervisor Federal Glover William Latier On February 27th, William Latier attended the Youth Town Hall Meeting to discuss mari- juana businesses in his community. During the meeting, he addressed the effects that marijuana would have if certain issues were excluded such as: edibles, permits, and buff- er zones. Because of Mr. Latiers leadership, greater understanding about the implications of critical issues related to marijuana legalization were brought to the attention of partici- pants in the Youth Town Hall meeting. CERTIFICATE OF MERIT The mission of the Contra Costa County Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board is to assess family and community needs regarding prevention and treatment of alcohol and other drug-related problems. Resultant findings and recommendations are forwarded to the Health Services Department and the Board of Supervisors. The Board also serves as an advocate for these findings and recommendations to the communities that we serve.” YOUTH LEADERSHIP GROUP District V – Supervisor Federal Glover Hillview Group #5 The three members of the Hillview Group #5 promoted the Project SUCCESS program among Spanish speaking incoming 6th graders and were able to motivate them to join the program. As a result of their involvement with Project SUCCESS, they attended the Marijua- na Prevention Youth Summit and shared important stories about the negative impact of marijuana in their community as well as identified possible solutions. YOUTH LEADERSHIP GROUP District IV - Supervisor Karen Mitchoff June Lee & Tergel Uuganbayer June Lee & Tergel Uuganbayer were instrumental in organizing the 2019 Wellness Fair at Las Lomas High School, to promote Alcohol Awareness information. They assisted in set- ting up a table with information on alcohol prevention and shared information with their peers. June & Tergel had many options to support at the Wellness Fair, but they felt strongly about communicating the harms of substance use and addiction to their peers. YOUTH LEADERSHIP GROUP District II - Supervisor Candace Andersen Miramonte High School Peer to Peer Club The Miramonte High School Peer to Peer Club is a group of high school students that are motivated to change the culture in their community around underage substance use. This year they went into the mandatory sophomore Human and Social Development classes at Miramonte and led games to support the alcohol and other drugs curriculum. According to post service surveys, the level of knowledge among sophomore students increased 30% on the topic of the harms of underage substance use. VOLUNTEER INDIVIDUAL District I - Supervisor John Gioia Monique McMorris Monique McMorris has dedicated the past 12 years to working as a Substance Abuse Counselor, and throughout her career she has worked in perinatal recovery, co- founded Men and Women of Purpose, directed a women’s recovery center, and facili- tated women’s groups in the West County Detention Facility. Her dedication to the field of Substance Use Disorders and her spirit of volunteering to support homeless individuals and women with mental health needs has led her to support over 100 women. VOLUNTEER INDIVIDUAL District III - Supervisor Diane Burgis Tom Hartrick Tom Hartrick is committed to ensuring that all youth in East Contra Costa County have the opportunity to take part in positive activities which will help them to build im- portant interpersonal skills. His dedication has led to hundreds of youth participating in sports, leadership workshops, teambuilding and family building activities. Tom embod- ies the principle of “we can make it happen” and through his collaboration with multi- ple community organizations he has made East County an area where youth can thrive without using alcohol or other drugs. NON-VOLUNTEER INDIVIDUAL District IV – Supervisor Karen Mitchoff Cindy Gershen Cindy Gershen is the creator of a remarkable Sustainable Hospitality Program focused on the science of food through culinary, hydroponics, and nutrition education at Mt. Diablo High School. Through her connections at the school she has been able to start a support program for students whose lives have been affected by someone else’s substance use. She co-facilitates these weekly groups with Psychology Doctorate (PsyD) students with the goal of bringing positive change to the participants and break the cycle of addiction. NON-VOLUNTEER INDIVIDUAL District V - Supervisor Federal Glover Martha Gonzales Martha Gonzales has served the Bay Point community for 26 years, working as a par- ent liaison for Riverview Middle School. Her unconditional support has helped to pro- vide connections between the Project SUCCESS coordinator at that location and the Bay Point community. This year alone, she has recruited over 30 families for preven- tion education workshops in both English and Spanish as well as recruited 15 new English Second Language (ESL) students to join the program. NON-VOLUNTEER INDIVIDUAL District II – Supervisor Candace Andersen Randy Cahn Randy Cahn is finishing up his 35th year at California High School in San Ramon, CA, teaching 9th grade health classes. He has been at the forefront in combating the Pre- scription Drug Epidemic by recognizing a need for education in his classes since 2012, when he first began discussing the topic. Since then, he has worked with community stakeholders to educate approximately 9,000 teens about prescription drug safety. Randy is an exceptional teacher who cares a great deal about the health of all of his students. He has, no doubt, made a significant difference in his students understanding of healthy choices related to alcohol and other drugs over the many years he has been a teacher. YOUTH LEADERSHIP INDIVIDUAL District V – Supervisor Federal Glover Grecia Reyes Grecia Reyes has gone above and beyond in promoting the Project SUCCESS program among new students and English Second Language (ESL) peers at Riverview Middle School. She has also used her artistic skills to design her own cartoons in Spanish to raise awareness about the harms of substance use in a way that her peers can relate to. Grecia’s dedication to Project SUCCESS has truly helped the program thrive at school. YOUTH LEADERSHIP INDIVIDUAL District I – Supervisor John Gioia Jason Cangjaya Jason Cangjaya is an active member of Discovering the Reality of Our Community (DROC) and the Alcohol, Marijuana, and Prescription Drug (AMPD) Coalition. As a repre- sentative of both of those programs Jason went before the Richmond City Council, as well as multiple Neighborhood Councils, to request that the city ban the sale of single- serve alcoholic beverages. Jason’s participation in the presentations to community mem- bers and elected officials garnered enormous support for the issue and ultimately com- pelled the City Council to direct staff to draft a policy banning single serve alcoholic bev- erages throughout the City of Richmond. YOUTH LEADERSHIP INDIVIDUAL District II – Supervisor Candace Andersen Kaylyn Goode Kaylyn Goode was one of the hosts of the Marijuana Prevention Youth Summit that took place in October 2018. It was very important to her to communicate the harms of mari- juana use to her peers in attendance of the event and she did so with great ease. Kaylyn possesses unique skills to facilitate activities and communicate messages regard- ing underage substance use in an engaging way. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. FIND that the extension of temporary employment for retiree Olga Adams is necessary to fill a critically needed position in the Health Services Department; 2. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the extension of temporary employment of retiree Olga Adams for the period continuing through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this request has an annual cost of approximately $25,687, which is 100% funded by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting the extension for the temporary employment of Olga Adams, Account Clerk-Advanced Level in the Payroll Unit. Ms. Adams has worked since her initially approved 180-day waiver exemption on May 23, 2017, and the Department is requesting this extension in order to ensure the timely and accurate pay warrant for 4600 employees. Ms. Adams retired from County service on March 30, 2017. She has over 20 years experience in Contra Costa County and spent the last ten years with Contra Costa Health Services Payroll Unit, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jo-Anne Linares, 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier , Deputy cc: D. 3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Extend the Temporary Employment Period for County Retiree in the Health Services Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and is uniquely qualified to perform the necessary tasks to meet payroll demands. In the absence of a countywide automated payroll timekeeping system, the Department's payroll clerks manually process bi-monthly timesheets and pay warrants for over 4,600 employees. It takes up to one year for a new employee to gain a full understanding of the many and complex payroll coding rules including negotiated benefits and differentials from varied union contracts. Contra Costa Health Services Payroll continues to experience retention issues over the years. Currently, there are five (5) payroll clerk vacancies. The Payroll Manager continues to work through the Account Clerk eligible list and interview candidates. In order to meet County payroll deadlines, staff works overtime including nights and weekends. Without the expertise of Ms. Adams, staff in 24/7 operations may not receive their differentials. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this request is not approved, the Health Services Department will not have adequate payroll staff to ensure pay warrants are issued accurately and timely to more than 4,600 employees. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Approved the extension through December 31, 2019. Directed Health Services to coordinate with Human Resources to explore creating a new employment classification, and to report to the Board of Supervisors at a future meeting with a plan to address issues, including the lack of automation of payroll health services. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. RECEIVE from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on service charges in County Service Area (CSA) M-28, a copy of which is attached. 2. OPEN the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; RECEIVE and CONSIDER all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and CLOSE the public hearing. 3. CONSIDER whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated service charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. 4. APPROVE the estimated service charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. 5. ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/132, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. 6. DIRECT the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Final Annual Report for CSA M-28 that conforms to the County’s official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jessi Duffy (925)313-2286 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, Brian Brown, Francisco & Associates, Inc., Slava Gospodchikov - Engineering Services , Diana Oyler - Finance , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts, Jessi Duffy- Special Districts D. 4 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:HEARING on Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area M-28; ADOPT resolution confirming the report and assessing charges. RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) M-28 Funds) (District III) Project No. 7473-6X9E70. FISCAL IMPACT: The levy of the annual service charges in CSA M-28 will provide revenues for the continued operation and maintenance of a water supply system. The CSA M-28 annual service charge was $104,027.22 for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 and will be $107,695.25 in Fiscal Year 2019-2020. This increase is based on the change in the Consumers Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area (All Urban Consumers). The annual service charges for CSA M-28 will be levied on one parcel in Fiscal Year 2019-2020. BACKGROUND: As directed by Article 1012-2.602 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, the Public Works Director prepared a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on service charges in CSA M-28 and filed it with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. CSA M-28 provides continued operation and maintenance of a water supply system. The Tentative Annual Report contains a description of each parcel of real property receiving services, the basic service charge for CSA M-28, and the estimated amount of the service charge for each parcel for the fiscal year. Upon the filing of the Tentative Annual Report, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors fixed a time, date and place for a Board hearing on the Tentative Annual Report and for filing objections or protests thereto, and published a notice of the hearing as provided in Government Code section 6066. Following the public hearing, the Board may adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated service charge, and shall make its determination upon each estimated service charge as described in the Tentative Annual Report. The service charges in the Tentative Annual Report were computed and apportioned according to a formula that fairly distributes the service charge among all subject parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits conferred on each property from the services provided. Staff recommends approval of the service charges in the Tentative Annual Report without modification. The service charges in the Tentative Annual Report are higher than the charges levied in Fiscal Year 2018-2019 because they incorporate an automatic adjustment approved by the parcel owners in CSA M-28 in 2007. The annual adjustment provision allows for an increase each year based upon the change in the Consumers Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area (All Urban Consumers). For Fiscal Year 2019-2020 the increase is 3.53% over the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 service charge rates. The Board approved this provision on August 7, 2007. Adoption of Resolution 2019/132 confirms the Tentative Annual Report and assesses the charges set forth therein, but does not levy the charges. The levy of the service charges occurs after the preparation of a Final Annual Report that conforms to the official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. The official assessment roll will be issued by the County Assessor on or about July 1, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for CSA M-28 is not confirmed, either as filed or as modified, the service charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report may not be levied for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. Therefore, the District would be unable to provide continued operation and maintenance of a water supply system or an alternate source of funding would have to be identified. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Received from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on service charges in County Service Area (CSA) M-28. Opened the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; received and considered all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and closed the public hearing. Considered whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated service charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Approved the estimated service charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Adopted Resolution No. 2019/132, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. Directed the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Final Annual Report for CSA M-28 that conforms to the County’s official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area M-28 Funds) (District III) Project No. 7473-6X9E70. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2019/132 Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 CCC Service Area M-28 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2019/132 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/132 IN THE MATTER OF: Confirmation of the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area M-28 (Willow Mobile Home Park Water District); WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has prepared a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area (CSA) M-28 and filed it with the Clerk of the Board pursuant to Article 1012-2.6 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code; WHEREAS, the Clerk of the Board has fixed a time, date and place for a public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report and published notice of the hearing as provided in Government Code section 6066; WHEREAS, the Board conducted the public hearing on June 11, 2019, and considered all written and oral testimony, including any and all objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; WHEREAS, the Tentative Annual Report contains a description of each parcel of real property receiving water services within CSA M-28, the basic service charge for CSA M-28, and the estimated service charge amount for each parcel in Fiscal Year 2019-2020; WHEREAS, the service charges in the Tentative Annual Report were computed and apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the service charge among all subject parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits conferred on each property from the water services provided within CSA M-28; and WHEREAS, the Board finds no cause to revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated service charge contained in the Tentative Annual Report; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The Board hereby CONFIRMS the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for CSA M-28 and assesses the charges set forth in the report. Contact: Jessi Duffy (925)313-2286 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, Brian Brown, Francisco & Associates, Inc., Slava Gospodchikov - Engineering Services , Diana Oyler - Finance , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts, Jessi Duffy- Special Districts TENTATIVE ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-28 (Willow Mobile Home Park Water District) June 11, 2019 Board of Supervisors John Gioia, District 1 Candace Andersen, District 2 Diane Burgis, District 3 Karen Mitchoff, District 4 Federal Glover, District 5 Prepared by Contra Costa County Public Works Department CSA M-28 Willow Mobile Home Park Water District Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 1 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Willow Mobile Home Park is located on Bethel Island and consists of one (1) 23-acre parcel that includes 172 mobile homes. In order for safe water services to be provided, it was recommended that a Community Service Area (CSA) be formed. On December 10, 1991 the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors approved County Resolution 91/807 which formed CSA M-28 (Willow Mobile Home Park Water District). CSA M-28 was formed pursuant to the County Service Area Law to ensure the proper flow of funds for the ongoing operation, maintenance, and servicing of community water system services within the Bethel Island Area. CSA M-28 has been given the power to acquire, construct, operate, replace, maintain, and repair a water supply and distribution system as authorized by California Government Code Section 25210.4(d) and 25120.4a(1). The funding for CSA M-28 comes from service charges which are obtained from the users of the water system, in accordance with former Government Code Section 25210.77a, Government Code Section 25210.9 and County Ordinance Section 1012-2.6. CSA M-28 owns and operates a well and a reverse osmosis (RO) system. Water is pumped from the well and is treated through a RO system. The treated water is stored in a 20,000 gallon tank. From the tank, the water is supplied via a single point to the Willow Mobile Home Park. In October 2014, a town hall meeting was held at the Willow Mobile Home Park to discuss the future of CSA M-28. The main issue discussed was that the existing aging RO system was becoming more expensive to maintain and in need of significant capital improvements. The cost of maintaining this system exceeds the annual assessment funding available. Without a major investment, it is anticipated that the RO system will fail eventually. Alternatives were introduced (status quo, increase service charge to pay for the necessary improvements, connect to Diablo Water District, and request State waiver for secondary standards). It appeared that the majority of the residents at the meeting preferred CSA M-28 to move toward reduction in service by requesting a waiver for secondary standards from the State. This alternative includes removing the RO system and providing the minimum allowable water treatment. By removing the RO treatment, the water would only meet the primary standards and would meet most, but not all, of the secondary standards. CSA M-28 would seek a waiver from the State for the secondary standards. Of all the alternatives presented at the town hall meeting, reducing water treatment allows the rate to be the lowest. It will also allow each individual mobile home to decide what type of treatment they prefer. Whereas, maintaining a more expensive community treatment system, such as the RO, forces everyone to pay for the same level of treatment. Subsequent to the town hall meeting, on December 16, 2014, the Board of Supervisors authorized a vote by the parcel owner. CSA M-28 requested the mobile home park owner, the single rate payer to CSA M-28, to vote if he would be willing to pay for a higher rate to fix the existing RO system or reject the rate increase and move toward reduced services. The mobile home park owner informed the County that he took a survey of the mobile home park residents and his survey indicated the mobile home park residents wanted him to vote against the rate increase. In early CSA M-28 Willow Mobile Home Park Water District Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 2 - 2015, the mobile home park owner submitted his ballot and voted against a rate increase. On March 3, 2015, the ballot was opened and the Board determined that there was a majority protest against a rate increase and directed staff to seek a waiver from the State. Based on the vote to reject the rate increase, CSA M-28 began the process to move toward reducing the water treatment service. As required by the regulations to obtain the waiver for secondary standards, CSA M-28 has contracted with a consultant to provide the necessary report. In late 2015, when staff visited the CSA M-28’s facility to perform a site review and obtain test samples, it was discovered that the RO system was not operating. The previous operator had turned off the RO system without informing CSA M-28 staff. The site review revealed that the water from the well was bypassing the RO system. However, the previous operator did install a chlorination system. Although the water had not gone through the RO system, the water did receive treatment. This revised system is similar to CSA M-28’s proposal to the State to replace the RO system. Despite the fact that the revised system is similar to what the CSA M-28 staff planned to present to the State, the unilateral decision to make the changes and lack of communication by the previous operator were not acceptable to CSA M-28. CSA M-28 staff directed test samples to be taken by the consultant to make sure the water complied with the primary standards. It was anticipated that the water would comply with primary standards because historically the raw water from the well has complied. This is the reason why a reduced service was a viable option being considered in 2014 when the County met with the residents. The consultant subsequently reported that the water under the revised system complied with the primary standards. CSA M-28 staff also replaced the operator. Lastly, CSA M-28 staff communicated with County Environmental Health, the regulatory agency, of the discovery and the actions taken. Changes at CSA M-28 have resulted in a new system operator and movement toward the same goals as discussed at the town hall meeting: 1)Obtain waiver from regulatory agency, 2)Reduce the level of community water treatment, and 3)Allow each resident to establish the appropriate system at their own mobile home. In Fiscal Year 2015-2016, CSA M-28 made improvements to the aging system and infrastructure. Some of the improvements completed included the upgrade of the auto-dialer alarm system, installation of a flow-based chlorine injection pump system, and installation of new wiring to the well pump. In Fiscal Year 2016-2017, CSA M-28 also replaced the existing well pump and upgraded its emergency response options by entering into an agreement with a nearby water district and contract with a water delivery/hauling company, to supply water to the Willow Mobile Home Park during emergency events. In Fiscal Year 2016-2017 a draft study was completed per state requirement in order to obtain a waiver. Some of the tasks completed in this study included; conducting additional water samples and analyzing additional alternatives. Future tasks will include compiling additional survey data, meeting with the State constructing some capital improvements. CSA M-28 Willow Mobile Home Park Water District Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 3 - In Fiscal Year 2017-2018 task orders were issued to the consultant for the preparation of a design memorandum, which documents the design philosophy for the proposed modifications, and design plans and specifications. CSA M-28 has implemented several improvements to the facility in Fiscal Year 2018-19 to make operations and maintenance more resilient and sustainable. These improvements include: •Installation of a double-contained and seismically-restrained sodium hypochlorite tank with a 35-gallon reservoir capacity to assure sustained operation; •Purchase of a second sodium hypochlorite dispensing pump as a backup; •Purchase of a spare parts kit for the primary sodium hypochlorite dispensing pump to assure continuous operations and quick repairs; and •Improvements to electrical service to improve operational resilience. CSA M-28 Willow Mobile Home Park Water District Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 4 - CURRENT ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION Pursuant to County Ordinance Section 1012-2.6, former County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 25210.77a), and current County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 24210.3, subd. (d)), the Tentative Annual Report has been filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, public notice has been given as required, and the Board conducted a Public Hearing and then made a determination on each estimated service charge in the tentative report. Contra Costa Board of Supervisors reviewed the Tentative Annual Report in accordance with Resolution No. 2019/132, on June 11, 2019, and conducted a Public Hearing in connection with the proceedings for CSA M-28. Upon adoption of the Final Annual Report by the Board of Supervisors, the charges contained herein will be collected on the property tax roll of Contra Costa County in the same manner, by the same persons, at the same time as, and together with the County's property taxes. Legal Authority As required by County Ordinance Section 1012-2.6, former County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 25210.77a), and current County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 24210.3, subd. (d)), the Tentative Annual Report includes the following minimum information as shown in the Service Charge Roll: 1. A description of each parcel of real property receiving the miscellaneous extended service; 2.The basic service charge; 3.The estimated amount of the service charge for each parcel for such year; and 4.A parcel list identifying each parcel receiving services that allows parcel owners to find their property on the list and determine the proposed charge. This annual report also includes an estimate of annual costs and the method of apportionment as additional information to allow the reader to better understand what services are being paid for, what is the total annual cost for the services provided, and how the cost of services is spread to each individual parcel. CSA M-28 Willow Mobile Home Park Water District Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 5 - ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL COST The Fiscal Year 2018-19 projected and Fiscal Year 2019-20 proposed revenues and expenditures for CSA M-28 are shown on the following page. A special fund has been set up for the collection of revenues and expenditures for CSA M-28. The total cost of construction, operation, and maintenance and servicing of the water system can be recovered from the collection of charges. Incidental expenses including administration, engineering fees, legal fees, and all other costs associated with the construction, operation and maintenance, and servicing of the water system may also be included. When CSA M-28 was formed, a financial analysis was performed to provide the framework for an operating budget for the proposed operation, maintenance and servicing of extended community water system services. Revenues collected from the charge shall be used only for the expenditures represented in this report. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year. In Fiscal Year 2019-20, CSA M-28 plans to continue the efforts to obtain the waiver from the State. Obtaining the waiver from the State is a significant effort that may include taking additional water samples, analyzing additional alternatives, compiling additional survey data, meeting with the State, etc. All the information gathered will be documented in an Engineer’s Report and presented to the State. CSA M-28 Willow Mobile Home Park Water District Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 6 - CSA M ‐28 Bethel Island Willow Park FY 2018‐19 FY 2019‐20 Fund 247300 Org 7473 Projected Proposed Carry over from prior year: $ 784,979.12 $ 764,808.30 Revenue: Taxes and assessments 104,027.22$ 107,695.25$ Transfer - Gov/Gov -$ -$ TOTAL CURRENT REVENUE $ 104,027.22 $ 107,695.25 Total Revenue + Carryover:889,006.34$ 872,503.55$ Expenditures: Postage 20.00$ 20.00$ Communications 271.62$ 300.00$ Utilities 5,411.09$ 5,700.00$ Household Expense (Brenntag Pacific)4,714.97$ 5,000.00$ Publications & Legal Notices 150.00$ 200.00$ Membership 150.00$ 165.00$ Maintenance of Buildings3,099.06$ 10,000.00$ Maintenance of Buildings-$ 2,000.00$ Maintenance of Buildings2,000.00$ 15,000.00$ Maintenance of Buildings1,000.00$ 3,000.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)527.32$ 600.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)-$ -$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)21,794.59$ 25,000.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)-$ 2,000.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)4,000.00$ 5,000.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)-$ 1,000.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)-$ 2,000.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)12,486.30$ 15,000.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)3,792.00$ 4,000.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)32,067.18$ 15,000.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)-$ -$ Other Special Dept Expense -$ 726,023.55$ Tax & Assessment Fees 250.85$ 275.00$ Interfund Exp - Gov/Gov (CCEHS)1,740.00$ 1,800.00$ Interfund Exp - Gov/Gov (County Counsel)1,055.10$ 3,000.00$ Interfund Exp - Gov/Gov (County Counsel)135.11$ -$ DOIT Phone Exchange376.04$ 420.00$ Reimbursements - Gov/Gov (County Staff)11,185.72$ 15,000.00$ Reimbursements - Gov/Gov (County Staff)1,051.04$ -$ Reimbursements - Gov/Gov (County Staff)16,920.05$ 15,000.00$ Reimbursements - Gov/Gov (County Staff)-$ -$ Total Expenditures 124,198.04$ 872,503.55$ FUND BALANCE AVAILABLE 764,808.30$ ‐$ CSA M-28 Willow Mobile Home Park Water District Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 7 - BOUNDARY MAP The general boundaries of the CSA are shown herein. The lines and dimensions of each parcel within the CSA are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year in which this report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. A copy of the Boundary Map is shown on the following page. Contra Costa County Service Area (CSA) M-28(Willow Mobile Home Park Water District)Boundary Map HARBOR RD¯WILLOW RDLegend CSA M-28 Boundary Parcel Lines Parcel within CSA M-28 300 0 300 600150 Feet CSA M-28 Willow Mobile Home Park Water District Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 9 - METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT Special vs. General Benefit On November 5, 1996 California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote On Taxes Act" which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for fees, charges and benefit assessments. Proposition 218 procedures stipulate that even if charges or benefit assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, future increases in the charges or benefit assessments must comply with the provisions of Proposition 218. However, if the future increase in the charge or benefit assessment were anticipated in the charge or benefit assessment formula when approved by property owners (e.g., consumer price index increases or a predetermined cap) then the future increase in the charge or benefit assessment would be in compliance with the intent and provisions of Proposition 218. Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and defines a special benefit as a particular and distinct benefit conferred on real property and not a general benefit received by the public at large. Parcels located within the boundaries of the CSA will be assessed for the operation, maintenance, and capital replacement associated with the water system serving the Bethel Island community, as described herein within the report, if they receive a special and direct benefit from the services. Furthermore, the identification and separation of general benefits from the special benefits follows for CSA M-28. Special benefits are conferred on property within the CSA from the water system by enhancing the desirability of property within the CSA due to lower costs associated with the treatment of drinking water, removing contaminates from the water being provided to the property, increases in health and wellness, and an improved quality of life. Properties outside of CSA M-28 are not served by the water system being operated and maintained from assessment revenues, therefore property outside the boundary of the CSA do not receive special benefits. The services within the CSA was specifically designed and created to provide additional and improved public resources for the direct advantage of property inside the CSA, and not the public at large. In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners receive within the CSA from the water system, it has been determined that no general benefits are associated with the water system provided within CSA M-28 because the conferred special benefits that are provided to the assessed property are not provided to property outside of the CSA or the public at large. The annual assessment pays for the operation of the water system provided within CSA M-28. The enhanced water system provided to property within CSA M-28 confer a special benefit and only serve those parcels within the boundary of the CSA. Without the services, the property located in the unincorporated area would not have a localized water system to treat their water. Therefore, the services in CSA M-28 are 100% special benefit to the parcels within the CSA. CSA M-28 Willow Mobile Home Park Water District Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 10 - Methodology The total operation and maintenance costs for the extended public services are apportioned in accordance with the methodology that is consistent with standard practices. The maximum charge rate was previously set at $75,300 per parcel (1991 dollars). Since 1991 the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers and the costs to operate and maintain the improvements increased, however the charge rate remained constant until Fiscal Year 2007-2008. In Fiscal Year 2007-2008 the charge rate was increased to $79,818 per parcel with an allowance for an increase each subsequent year based upon the San Francisco Bay Area – All Urban Consumers as of April 2007 (215.842). Due to an aging system, the cost of operating and maintaining water facilities continues to increase. It was proposed in Fiscal Year 2010-11 that the charge rate be increased to $95,500 per parcel (8.5% increase). However, this increase was not supported by the property owner, and therefore the 8.5% increase was not imposed. The cost of operating and maintaining water facilities continues to increase, due to an aging system. A rate increase was proposed again in Fiscal Year 2014-15, so that the charge rate be increased from $91,937 to $335,939 per parcel. However, this increase was not supported by the property owner, and therefore the increase was not imposed. Rate The February 2019 CPI Index is 291.227, therefore the maximum rate for Fiscal Year 2019-20 can be increased 3.53% to $107,695.25 per parcel. CSA M-28 proposes to levy charges at the maximum rate for Fiscal Year 2019-20. In Fiscal Year 2019-20, it is recommended based upon projected expenditures, that the maximum rate of $107,695.25 per parcel be collected. The estimated $107,695.25 in revenue will be needed to provide the services referenced above in Fiscal Year 2019-20. There is one parcel that is included in the CSA. If the charge of $107,695.25 is divided by one (1) parcel, the service charge per parcel is $107,695.25. SERVICE CHARGE ROLL A list, which shows those parcels to be charged for Fiscal Year 2019-20, including a description of each parcel to be charged is shown below. Parcel Proposed FY 2019-20 Number Amount 029-020-004-7 $107,695.25 RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. RECEIVE from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in County Service Area (CSA) M-30, a copy of which is attached. 2. OPEN the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; RECEIVE and CONSIDER all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and CLOSE the public hearing. 3. CONSIDER whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated assessment charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. 4. APPROVE the estimated assessment charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. 5. ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/134, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. 6. DIRECT the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Final Annual Report for CSA M-30 that APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jessi Duffy (925)313-2286 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, Brian Brown, Francisco & Associates, Inc., Slava Gospodchikov - Engineering Services , Diana Oyler - Finance , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts, Jessi Duffy- Special Districts D. 5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:HEARING on Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area M-30; ADOPT resolution confirming the report and assessing charges. RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) conforms to the County’s official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area M-30 Funds) (District II) Project No. 7499-6X5491. FISCAL IMPACT: The levy of the annual assessment charges in CSA M-30 will provide revenues for police services, park and roadside landscape maintenance, public street maintenance and street lighting services. The CSA M-30 total annual assessment was $49,918.40 for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 and will be $52,712.00 in Fiscal Year 2019-2020. This increase is based on the approved annual escalator outlined in the CSA M-30 formation documents. The annual escalator is equal to the annual change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area (All Urban Consumers) plus two (2) percent. There are 40 developed parcels in the CSA. The assessment charge per parcel for CSA M-30 was $1,247.96 for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 and will be $1,317.80 for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. BACKGROUND: As directed by Article 1012-2.602 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, the Public Works Director prepared a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in CSA M-30 and filed it with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. CSA M-30 provides police services, park and roadside landscape maintenance, public street maintenance, and street lighting services. The Tentative Annual Report contains a description of each parcel of real property receiving services, the basic assessment charge for CSA M-30, and the estimated amount of the assessment charge for each parcel for the fiscal year. Upon the filing of the Tentative Annual Report, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors fixed a time, date, and place for a Board hearing on the Tentative Annual Report and for filing objections or protests thereto, and published a notice of the hearing as provided in Government Code section 6066. Following the public hearing, the Board may adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated assessment charge, and shall make its determination upon each estimated assessment charge as described in the Tentative Annual Report. The assessment charges in the Tentative Annual Report were computed and apportioned according to a formula that fairly distributes the assessment charge among all subject parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits conferred on each property from the services provided. Staff recommends approval of the assessment charges in the Tentative Annual Report without modification. The assessment charges in the Tentative Annual Report are higher than the charges levied in Fiscal Year 2018-2019 because they incorporate an automatic adjustment approved by the parcel owners in CSA M-30 in 1997. The adjustment provision allows for an increase each year based upon the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Area (All Urban Consumers) plus two percent (2%). For Fiscal Year 2019-2020 the increase is 3.53% over the Fiscal year 2018-2019 assessment rates. The Board approved this provision on May 5, 1998. Adoption of Resolution 2019/134 confirms the Tentative Annual Report and assesses the charges set forth therein, but does not levy the charges. The levy of the assessment charges occurs after the preparation of a Final Annual Report that conforms to the official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. The official assessment roll will be issued by the County Assessor on or about July 1, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for CSA M-30 is not confirmed, either as filed or If the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for CSA M-30 is not confirmed, either as filed or as modified, the assessment charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report may not be levied for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. Therefore, the District would be unable to provide police services, park and roadside landscape maintenance, public street maintenance, and street lighting services or an alternate source of funding would have to be identified. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Received from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in County Service Area (CSA) M-30. Opened the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; received and considered all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and CLOSE the public hearing. Considered whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated assessment charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Approved the estimated assessment charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Adopted Resolution No. 2019/134, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. Directed the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Final Annual Report for CSA M-30 that conforms to the County’s official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area M-30 Funds) (District II) Project No. 7499-6X5491. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2019/134 Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 CCC Service Area M-30 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2019/134 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/134 IN THE MATTER OF: Confirmation of the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area M-30 (Alamo Springs); WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has prepared a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area (CSA) M-30 and filed it with the Clerk of the Board pursuant to Article 1012-2.6 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code; WHEREAS, the Clerk of the Board has fixed a time, date and place for a public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report and published notice of the hearing as provided in Government Code section 6066; WHEREAS, the Board conducted the public hearing on June 11, 2019, and considered all written and oral testimony, including any and all objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; WHEREAS, the Tentative Annual Report contains a description of each parcel of real property receiving police services, park and roadside landscape maintenance, public street maintenance, and street lighting services within CSA M-30, the basic assessment charge for CSA M-30, and the estimated assessment charge amount for each parcel in Fiscal Year 2019-2020; WHEREAS, the assessment charges in the Tentative Annual Report were computed and apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the assessment charge among all subject parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits conferred on each property from the police services, park and roadside landscape maintenance, public street maintenance, and street lighting services provided within CSA M-30; and WHEREAS, the Board finds no cause to revise, change, reduce, increase or modify any estimated assessment charge contained in the Tentative Annual Report; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The Board hereby CONFIRMS the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for CSA M-30 and assesses the charges set forth in the report. Contact: Jessi Duffy (925)313-2286 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, Brian Brown, Francisco & Associates, Inc., Slava Gospodchikov - Engineering Services , Diana Oyler - Finance , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts, Jessi Duffy- Special Districts TENTATIVE ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-30 (Ala mo Springs) June 11, 2019 Board of Supervisors John Gioia, District 1 Candace Andersen, District 2 Diane Burgis, District 3 Karen Mitchoff, District 4 Federal Glover, District 5 Prepared by Contra Costa County Public Works Department CSA M-30 Alamo Springs Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 1 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION In August 1989, the Town of Danville (“Town”) and the County of Contra Costa (“County”) entered into a Memorandum of Agreement to undertake a joint-jurisdiction General Plan and project review for the Alamo Springs Project (“Project”), which is located north of Interstate 680 off Alamo Springs Drive. The project originally provided for the development of 53 single- family homes, of which 11 were to be located within the Town of Danville and 42 were to remain in the unincorporated portion of Contra Costa County. After certification of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Project, the Board of Supervisors on December 8, and 15, 1992, approved the Project. The unincorporated area of the Project was simultaneously rezoned to a planned unit development. On January 23, 1996, the Town and County entered into a new Memorandum of Agreement, superseding the August 1989 Memorandum of Agreement, to establish procedures for joint review and approval of the project. During the planning process, it was decided that the Town would provide extended services in the form of police, public street maintenance, park and roadside landscape maintenance to the homes in the unincorporated area. Public Street lighting would be provided by Contra Costa County. It was decided that a benefit assessment or service charge collected on the property tax bills via a County Service Area (CSA) was the best funding mechanism to pay for the increased services. On September 3, 1997, Danville Town Council adopted Resolution No. 124-97, requesting Contra Costa County Local Agency Formation Commission (“LAFCO”) approve formation of County Service Area (CSA) M-30. On November 17, 1997, LAFCO approved formation of CSA M-30. On May 5, 1998 the Board of Supervisors conducted a public hearing and subsequently approved Resolution 1998/235, which authorized the annual levy of assessments on the parcels located within CSA M-30 to fund extended public services. The services provided by CSA M-30 are: 1. Police Services. All police services provided to residents by Town police, including without limitation, community services, crime prevention, investigation, patrol, and traffic enforcement. 2. Park and Roadside Landscape Services. All park and roadside landscape services provided to residents including without limitation, maintenance of parks and other public facilities, such as the Danville Library and Community Center, and maintenance of all roadside and median landscaping. 3. Public Street Maintenance. All public street maintenance, including without limitation, repair and replacement of asphalt on public streets, crack sealing, and other maintenance measures to protect and prolong the life of the public streets, repair and replacement of street signs, stop signs, etc. 4. Street Lighting. The operation, maintenance and servicing of public street lights and appurtenant facilities as required to provide safe lighting along public streets. This maintenance is provided by Contra Costa County. CSA M-30 Alamo Springs Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 2 - CURRENT ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION Pursuant to County Ordinance Section 1012-2.6, former County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 25210.77a), and current County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 24210.3, subd. (d)), the Tentative Annual Report has been filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, public notice has been given as required, and the Board of Supervisors conducted a Public Hearing and then made a determination on each estimated service charge in the tentative report. The Board of Supervisors reviewed the Tentative Annual Report in accordance with Resolution No. 2019/134, on June 11, 2019, and conducted a Public Hearing in connection with the proceedings for CSA M-30. Upon adoption of the Final Annual Report by the Board of Supervisors, the charges contained herein will be collected on the property tax roll of Contra Costa County in the same manner, by the same persons, at the same time as, and together with the County's property taxes. Legal Authority As required by County Ordinance Section 1012-2.6, former County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 25210.77a), and current County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 24210.3, subd. (d)), the Tentative Annual Report includes the following minimum information as shown in the Service Charge Roll: 1. A description of each parcel of real property receiving the miscellaneous extended service; 2. The basic service charge; 3. The estimated amount of the service charge for each parcel for such year; and 4. A parcel list identifying each parcel receiving services that allows parcel owners to find their property on the list and determine the proposed charge. This annual report also includes an estimate of annual costs and the method of apportionment as additional information to allow the reader to better understand what services are being paid for, what is the total annual cost for the services provided, and how the cost of services is spread to each individual parcel. CSA M-30 Alamo Springs Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 3 - ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL COST The Fiscal Year 2018-19 projected and Fiscal Year 2019-20 proposed revenues and expenditures are shown below. A special fund has been set up for the collection of revenues and expenditures for CSA M-30. Incidental expenses including administration, engineering fees, legal fees and all other costs associated with the extended services may also be included. When CSA M-30 was formed, a financial analysis was performed to provide the framework for an operating budget for the proposed services. This analysis was based on the estimated expenses for each service component (police, parks, and roadside landscape, street maintenance, and street lighting). Revenues collected from the benefit assessment or service charge shall be used only for the expenditures represented in this report. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year. CSA M‐30 Alamo Sp rin gs‐Danville FY 2018‐19 FY 2019‐20 Fund 249900 Org 7499 Projected Proposed Carry ov er from prior year: $ 19,235.24 $ 34,545.66 Revenue: Taxes and Assessments 49,918.40$ 52,712.00$ TOTAL CURRENT REVENUE 49,918.40$ 52,712.00$ Total Revenue + Carryover:69,153.64$ 87 ,257.66$ Expenditures: Publications & Legal Notices 150.00$ 200.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)32,931.62$ 35,000.00$ Other Special Dept Expense -$ 49,357.66$ Taxes & Assessments 284.00$ 300.00$ Transfer CSA M-30 to CSA L-100 388.44$ 400.00$ Reimbursements - Gov /Gov (County Staff)853.92$ 2,000.00$ Total Expenditures 34,607.98$ 87,257.66$ FUND BALANCE AVAILABLE 34,545.66$ ‐$ CSA M-30 Alamo Springs Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 4 - BOUNDARY MAP The general boundaries of the CSA are shown herein. The lines and dimensions of each parcel within the CSA are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year in which this report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. A copy of the Boundary Map is shown on the following page. Contra Costa County Service Area (CSA) M-30(Alamo Springs)Boundary Map HIGH EAGLE RD¯ 380 0 380 760190FeetALAMOSPRINGSDRLegend CSA M-30 Boundary Parcel Lines Parcels within CSA M-30 KI M B E R L E Y PL ALAMO SPRINGS DR COR RIEPL CSA M-30 Alamo Springs Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 6 - METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT Special vs. General Benefit On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote On Taxes Act" which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for fees, charges and benefit assessments. Proposition 218 procedures stipulate that even if charges or benefit assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, future increases in the charges or benefit assessments must comply with the provisions of Proposition 218. However, if future increases in the charge or benefit assessment were anticipated in the charge or benefit assessment formula when approved by property owners (e.g., consumer price index increases or a predetermined cap) then the future increase in the charge or benefit assessment would be in compliance with the intent and provisions of Proposition 218. Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and defines a special benefit as a particular and distinct benefit conferred on real property and not a general benefit received by the public at large. The extended public services provided within CSA M-30 are deemed a special benefit and only serve the parcels located within the boundaries of the District. Without the services, the homes located in the unincorporated area would receive standard County police services, limited park and roadside landscape services, limited public street maintenance and no County public street lighting. Standard County police services are characterized by 1.1 officers per 1,000 residents, and traffic enforcement would be provided by the California Highway Patrol on an as requested basis. Therefore, the services in CSA M-30 are 100% special benefit to the parcels within the CSA. Methodology The total operation and maintenance costs for the extended public services are apportioned in accordance with the methodology that is consistent with standard practices. Since the service charge is levied on the owners of properties as shown on the tax rolls, the final charges must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. The parcels of the Project that make up CSA M-30 are all designated for residential use. The projects Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) require that most parcels be developed with a main residential unit of at least 3,500 square feet. While the parcel sizes vary, they all have substantially the same size building pads. It is anticipated that homes built on these lots will be similar in size and that the size of families who live in these homes will be similar. For these reasons, the need for, and the use of each of the services (miscellaneous police, park and roadside landscaping maintenance, public street maintenance and County public street lighting) will be substantially the same for each parcel. Therefore, the same service charge will be levied on each developed parcel within CSA M-30. In order for a parcel to be classified as developed, a building permit must be issued prior to April 30. CSA M-30 Alamo Springs Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 7 - The methodology for calculating the service charge per parcel for each of the services is similar. In Fiscal Year 1997/98 the service charge per parcel was set at $467.13 per parcel. To determine the cost per parcel, the total budget for providing service to the current service area was divided by the total number of parcels or units within the current service area. Please refer to Contra Costa County Resolution 1998-235 for a detailed report that includes the initial calculation of this service charge. The maximum service charge may be adjusted annually to reflect the prior year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose plus two percent (2%). The base CPI index used in annual calculations began with April 1997 (159.6). However, starting in Fiscal Year 2010-11, the annual CPI was changed to February for administrative purposes and the annual change in the February CPI shall be used in each subsequent year. Any change in the rate per developed parcel, which is the result of the change in the CPI shall not be deemed an increase in the service charge subject to the requirements of Proposition 218. Rate For Fiscal Year 2018-19 the allowed maximum rate was $1,247.96 per developed parcel. The Fiscal Year 2019-20 rate has been calculated as follows: $1,247.96 per developed parcel in Fiscal Year 2018-19 +3.53% CPI increase for FY 2019-20= $1,291.96 +2.00% increase for FY 2019-20 = $1,317.80 In Fiscal Year 2019-20, it is recommended based upon projected expenditures, that the maximum rate of $1,317.80 be collected. It is estimated $52,712.00 in revenue will be needed to provide the services referenced above in Fiscal Year 2019-20. There are 40 parcels that have had a building permit issued. If you divide $52,712.00 by 40 homes, the service charge per parcel is $1,317.80. CSA M-30 Alamo Springs Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 8 - SERVICE CHARGE ROLL A list, of those parcels to be charged for Fiscal Year 2019-20, including a description of each parcel to be charged is shown on the following page. SERVICE CHARGE ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 CSA M-30 Alamo Springs Final Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor Parcel Number Property Address Added to Roll Lot Number FY 2019-20 Assessment 197-050-029 $1,317.80333 CORRIE PL2008 38 197-440-005 $1,317.8032 KIMBERLY PL2000 17 197-440-006 $1,317.8030 KIMBERLY PL2002 18 197-440-007 $1,317.8028 KIMBERLEY PL2004 19 197-440-008 $1,317.8026 KIMBERLY PL2004 20 197-440-009 $1,317.8024 KIMBERLY PL2001 21 197-440-010 $1,317.8022 KIMBERLY PL2001 22 197-440-011 $1,317.80120 ALAMO SPRINGS2002 23 197-440-012 $1,317.80122 ALAMO SPRINGS2013 24 197-440-013 $1,317.80124 ALAMO SPRINGS2013 25 197-440-014 $1,317.80115 ALAMO SPRINGS2014 26 197-440-015 $1,317.80117 ALAMO SPRINGS2013 27 197-440-016 $1,317.80119 ALAMO SPRINGS2013 28 197-440-017 $1,317.80121 ALAMO SPRINGS2015 29 197-440-018 $1,317.80123 ALAMO SPRINGS2013 30 197-440-019 $1,317.80125 ALAMO SPRINGS2014 31 197-450-003 $1,317.8033 KIMBERLEY PL2001 16 197-450-004 $1,317.80131 ALAMO SPRINGS2006 32 197-450-005 $1,317.80133 ALAMO SPRINGS2013 33 197-450-006 $1,317.80135 ALAMO SPRINGS2002 34 197-450-007 $1,317.80330 CORRIE PL2016 35 197-450-008 $1,317.80331 CORRIE PL2014 36 197-450-009 $1,317.80332 CORRIE PL2014 37 197-450-010 $1,317.80334 CORRIE PL2001 39 197-450-011 $1,317.80335 CORRIE PL2000 40 197-450-012 $1,317.80336 CORRIE PL2001 41 197-450-013 $1,317.80337 CORRIE PL2008 42 197-450-014 $1,317.80338 CORRIE PL2001 43 197-450-015 $1,317.80339 CORRIE PL2002 44 197-450-016 $1,317.80340 CORRIE PL2001 45 197-460-008 $1,317.8025 KIMBERLY PL2003 12 197-460-009 $1,317.8027 KIMBERLY PL2003 13 197-460-010 $1,317.80141 ALAMO SPRINGS2001 46 197-460-011 $1,317.80143 ALAMO SPRINGS2015 47 197-460-012 $1,317.80147 ALAMO SPRINGS2001 48 197-460-013 $1,317.80149 ALAMO SPRINGS2001 49 197-460-014 $1,317.80151 ALAMO SPRINGS2014 50 197-460-015 $1,317.80152 ALAMO SPRINGS2001 51 197-460-016 $1,317.80150 ALAMO SPRINGS2006 52 197-460-017 $1,317.80148 ALAMO SPRINGS2001 53 $52,712.00 40 Total Revenue: Parcels 05/06/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAM_30\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa m-30.frx - m30_1920t.dbf - 9 - RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. RECEIVE from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in County Service Area (CSA) M-31, a copy of which is attached. 2. OPEN the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; RECEIVE and CONSIDER all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and CLOSE the public hearing. 3. CONSIDER whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated assessment charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. 4. APPROVE the estimated assessment charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. 5. ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/135, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. 6. DIRECT the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Final Annual Report for CSA M-31 that conforms to the County’s official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area M-31 Funds) (District IV) Project No. 7476-6X5195. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jessi Duffy (925)313-2286 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, Brian Brown, Francisco & Associates, Inc., Slava Gospodchikov - Engineering Services , Diana Oyler - Finance , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts, Jessi Duffy- Special Districts D. 6 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:HEARING on Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area M-31; ADOPT resolution confirming the report and assessing charges. RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) FISCAL IMPACT: The levy of the annual assessment charges in CSA M-31 will provide revenues for transportation demand management services. The CSA M-31 total annual assessment was $309,771.56 for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 and will be $336,218.30 in Fiscal Year 2019-2020. This increase is based on the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area (All Urban Consumers). The assessment charges for CSA M-31 were $70.78/developed residential unit and $0.1246 per developed commercial square foot in Fiscal Year 2018-2019. The assessment charges for CSA M-31 are $73.28/developed residential unit and $0.1290 per developed commercial square foot in Fiscal Year 2019-2020. BACKGROUND: As directed by Article 1012-2.602 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, the Public Works Director prepared a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in CSA M-31 and filed it with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. CSA M-31 provides transportation demand management services. The Tentative Annual Report contains a description of each parcel of real property receiving services, the basic assessment charge for CSA M-31 and the estimated amount of the assessment charge for each parcel for the fiscal year. Upon the filing of the Tentative Annual Report, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors fixed a time, date, and place for a Board hearing on the Tentative Annual Report and for filing objections or protests thereto, and published a notice of the hearing as provided in Government Code section 6066. Following the public hearing, the Board may adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated assessment charges, and shall make its determination upon each estimated assessment charge as described in the Tentative Annual Report. The assessment charges in the Tentative Annual Report were computed and apportioned according to a formula that fairly distributes the assessment charge among all subject parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits conferred on each property from the services provided. Staff recommends approval of the assessment charges in the Tentative Annual Report without modification. The assessment charges in the Tentative Annual Report are higher than the charges levied in Fiscal Year 2018-2019 because they incorporate an automatic adjustment approved by the parcel owners within CSA M-31 in 2002. The adjustment provision allows for an increase each year based upon the change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area (All Urban Consumers). For Fiscal year 2019-2020 the increase is 3.53% over the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 assessment rates. The Board approved this provision in 2002. Adoption of Resolution 2019/135 confirms the Tentative Annual Report and assesses the charges set forth therein, but does not levy the charges. The levy of the assessment charges occurs after the preparation of a Final Annual Report that conforms to the official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. The official assessment roll will be issued by the County Assessor on or about July 1, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for CSA M-31 is not confirmed, either as filed or If the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for CSA M-31 is not confirmed, either as filed or as modified, the assessment charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report may not be levied for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. Therefore, the District would be unable to provide transportation demand management services, or an alternate source of funding would have to be identified. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Received from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in County Service Area (CSA) M-31. Opened the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; received and considered all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and closed the public hearing. Considered whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated assessment charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Approved the estimated assessment charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Adopted Resolution No. 2019/135, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. Directed the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Final Annual Report for CSA M-31 that conforms to the County’s official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area M-31 Funds) (District IV) Project No. 7476-6X5195. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2019/135 Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 CCC Service Area M-31 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2019/135 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/135 IN THE MATTER OF: Confirmation of the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area M-31 (Contra Costa Centre Transit Village); WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has prepared a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area (CSA) M-31 and filed it with the Clerk of the Board pursuant to Article 1012-2.6 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code; WHEREAS, the Clerk of the Board has fixed a time, date and place for a public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report and published notice of the hearing as provided in Government Code section 6066; WHEREAS, the Board conducted the public hearing on June 11, 2019, and considered all written and oral testimony, including any and all objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; WHEREAS, the Tentative Annual Report contains a description of each parcel of real property receiving transportation demand management services within CSA M-31, the basic assessment charge for CSA M-31, and the estimated assessment charge amount for each parcel in Fiscal Year 2019-2020; WHEREAS, the assessment charges in the Tentative Annual Report were computed and apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the assessment charge among all subject parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits conferred on property from the transportation demand management services provided within CSA M-31; and WHEREAS, the Board finds no cause to revise, change, reduce, increase or modify any estimated assessment charge contained in the Tentative Annual Report; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The Board hereby CONFIRMS the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for CSA M-31 and assesses the charges set forth in the report. Contact: Jessi Duffy (925)313-2286 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, Brian Brown, Francisco & Associates, Inc., Slava Gospodchikov - Engineering Services , Diana Oyler - Finance , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts, Jessi Duffy- Special Districts TENTATIVE ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SERVICE AREA M-31 (Contra Costa Centre Transit Village) Transportation Demand Management Services June 11, 2019 Board of Supervisors John Gioia, District 1 Candace Andersen, District 2 Diane Burgis, District 3 Karen Mitchoff, District 4 Federal Glover, District 5 Prepared by Contra Costa County Public Works Department CSA M-31 Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 1 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION In 2002 it was recognized that the area commonly known as Contra Costa Centre Transit Village, in the unincorporated portion of Contra Costa County, would be redeveloped, creating a need for new transit services. Contra Costa Centre Transit Village is located east of Interstate 680. The Contra Costa Centre Transit Village benefits residents and employees with a variety of travel mode options. A core element of the travel mode options for residents and employees, and a key traffic mitigation measure in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents certified at the time of adoption and amendment of the Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Specific Plan, was the establishment of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs. TDM programs include carpooling, vanpooling, ridesharing, flex time, staggered work hours, guaranteed ride home, telecommuting, etc. The property owners within Contra Costa Centre Transit Village collectively had a mandate to achieve at least 30% TDM performance (i.e. 30% or more of the area employees arrive at work via something other than a single-occupied car). The Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Association is the collective mechanism by which the developer/property owner’s obligation for TDM programs is achieved. The Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Association is a private non-profit corporation whose membership consists of the property owners in the area. It has been in existence since the mid-1980s. On April 23, 2002, the Board of Supervisors approved Resolution Nos. 2002/256 and 2002/257 which recommended to the Local Agency Formation Commission of Contra Costa County (LAFCO) the formation of County Service Area (CSA) M-31, Contra Costa Centre Transit Village. The property located within CSA M-31 receives a special and distinct benefit over and above the general benefits received by the public at-large in the form of extended TDM services. These extended transportation services consist of the implementation of TDM programs as discussed in this report and in the Plan for Providing Services for CSA M-31, which is on file with LAFCO. Resolution 2002/256 further stated that CSA M-31 services should be supported by a benefit assessment or special tax levy on parcels that receive this special and distinct benefit from the CSA M-31 services. On June 11, 2002, the Board of Supervisors conducted a public hearing and subsequently approved Resolution 2002/362 which authorized the annual levy of benefit assessments on the parcels located within CSA M-31 to fund TDM programs. On July 10, 2002, LAFCO conducted a public hearing and subsequently approved Resolution 02- 19 which formed CSA M-31. For each year since Fiscal Year 2002-03, benefit assessments or service charges have been levied within CSA M-31. On June 3, 2008, by Resolution No. 2008/366, the Board of Supervisors approved the annexation of Subdivision 05-8950 (Pleasant Hill BART Redevelopment Property) into CSA M-31. This annexation was subsequently approved by LAFCO Resolution 08-19 on August 13, 2008. CSA M-31 Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 2 - The following is a list of programs and services that have been proposed to be funded in Fiscal Year 2019-20 by CSA M-31: 1) Transit Subsidy Program: Load on Clipper card $50 value BART fare for $20. Must pledge to take BART to work a minimum of three days per week. • 80 participants for nine months 2) Carpool Incentive Program: Provide two $15 Chevron gas cards per carpool per month for nine months. • 20 participants for nine months 3) Bus Subsidy Program: Purchase a $60 value monthly County Connection bus pass or reimbursement of other transit bus pass for $30. • 15 participants for nine months 4) Bike/Walk to Work Incentive Program: Bike or walk to work at least three times per week per month, a minimum of 12 times each month, and receive a $15 voucher. • 10 participants for nine months 5) Guaranteed Ride Home Program: This program is managed by Contra Costa Centre Transit Village. The program is an “insurance policy” against being stranded without a way to get home for commuters who take a commute alternative (carpool, vanpool, public transit, bicycle or walk) to work and have a qualified emergency which does not allow them to use the commute alternative to return home. 6) Mid-Day Shuttle: The mid-day shuttle, a clean air natural gas shuttle, runs from 10:30 a.m. – 2:10 p.m., Monday through Friday, with stops at all Centre buildings and between the Contra Costa Centre Transit Village, the Countrywood Shopping Mall and Kohl’s, free of charge. 7) Green Fleet Program: The Contra Costa Centre Transit Village (CCCTV) provides employees with access to local vehicles (e.g. bicycles, electric bicycles, electric and hybrid cars) to use through the Contra Costa Centre Transit Village and vicinity during the workday. Employees are able to check-out vehicles online or electronically at various kiosk locations. The Green Fleet programs are free to CCCTV employees. 8) Marketing Plan: The Contra Costa Centre Transit Village markets the program through newsletters, posters, brochures and promotional handouts. Additionally, they meet with employers and employees directly, and host events and transportation fairs to ensure Centre area workers are informed of the various commute alternatives, subsidies and incentives available to them through the Contra Costa Centre Transit Village TDM Program. These TDM services may be amended annually, including the addition or deletion of the services as required to meet the 30% TDM performance goal as determined by Contra Costa County in consultation with the Contra Costa Centre Association or its successor. CSA M-31 Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 3 - CURRENT ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION Pursuant to County Ordinance Section 1012-2.6, former County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 25210.77a), and current County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 24210.3, subd. (d)), the Tentative Annual Report has been filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, public notice has been given as required, and the Board conducted a Public Hearing and then made a determination on each estimated service charge in the tentative report. Contra Costa Board of Supervisors reviewed the Tentative Annual Report in accordance with Resolution No. 2019/135, on June 4, 2019, and conducted a Public Hearing in connection with the proceedings for CSA M-31. Upon adoption of the Final Annual Report by the Board of Supervisors, the charges contained herein will be collected on the property tax roll of Contra Costa County in the same manner, by the same persons, at the same time as, and together with the County's property taxes. Legal Authority As required by County Ordinance Section 1012-2.6, former County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 25210.77a), and current County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 24210.3, subd. (d)), the Tentative Annual Report includes the following minimum information as shown in the Service Charge Roll: 1. A description of each parcel of real property receiving the miscellaneous extended service; 2. The basic service charge; 3. The estimated amount of the service charge for each parcel for such year; and 4. A parcel list identifying each parcel receiving services that allows parcel owners to find their property on the list and determine the proposed charge. This annual report also includes an estimate of annual costs, the method of apportionment as additional information to allow the reader to better understand what services are being paid for, what is the total annual cost for the services provided, and how the cost of services are spread to each individual parcel. ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL COST The Fiscal Year 2018-19 projected and Fiscal Year 2019-20 proposed revenues and expenditures are shown below. A special fund has been set up for the collection of revenues and expenditures for CSA M-31. The total cost to provide the TDM services can be recovered from the collection of these service charges. Incidental expenses including administration, engineering fees, legal fees, and all other costs associated with the TDM services may also be included. When CSA M-31 was formed for the ongoing funding of the Contra Costa Centre Transit Village's TDM Program, a financial analysis was performed to provide the framework for an operating budget for the proposed extended transportation demand management services. This was based on the estimated expenses for each TDM service program component (carpooling, vanpooling, ridesharing, flex time, staggered work hours, guaranteed ride home, telecommuting, etc.). Revenues collected from the benefit assessment or service charge shall be used only for the expenditures represented in this report. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year. CSA M-31 Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 4 - CSA M‐31 Pleasant Hill BART TDM FY 2018‐19 FY 2019‐20 Fund 247600 Org 7476 Projected Proposed Carr y over from prior year: $ 55,407.32 $ 52,139.01 Revenue: Taxes and assessments 309,771.56$ 336,218.30$ TOTAL CURRENT REVENUE $ 309,771.56 $ 336,218.30 Total Revenue + Carryover: 365,178.88$ 388,357.31$ Expenditures: Publications & Legal Notices 150.00$ 200.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)309,652.00$ 336,800.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Non-County)2,035.44$ 2,500.00$ Other Special Dept Expense -$ 46,307.31$ Taxes and Assessments 263.60$ 300.00$ Interfund Exp - Gov/Gov (County Counsel)250.00$ 250.00$ Reimbursements - Gov /Gov (County Staff)688.83$ 2,000.00$ Total Expenditures 313,039.87$ 388,357.31$ FUND BALANCE AVAILABLE 52,139.01$ ‐$ CSA M-31 Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 5 - BOUNDARY MAP The general boundaries of the CSA are shown herein. The lines and dimensions of each parcel within the CSA are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year in which this report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. A copy of the Boundary Map is shown on the following page. Contra Costa County Service Area (CSA) M-31(Contra Costa Centre Transit Village)Boundary Map TREAT BLVD ¯ 340 0 340 680170FeetOAK RDLAS JUNTAS WY JONES RDCHERRY LNLegend CSA M-31 Boundary Parcel Lines Parcels within CSA M-31 CSA M-31 Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 7 - METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT Special vs. General Benefit On November 5, 1996, California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote On Taxes Act" which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for fees, charges and benefit assessments. Proposition 218 procedures stipulate that even if charges or benefit assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, future increases in the charges or benefit assessments must comply with the provisions of Proposition 218. However, if the future increase in the charge or benefit assessment were anticipated in the charge or benefit assessment formula when approved by property owners (e.g., consumer price index increases or a predetermined cap) then the future increase in the charge or benefit assessment would be in compliance with the intent and provisions of Proposition 218. Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and defines a special benefit as a particular and distinct benefit conferred on real property and not a general benefit received by the public at large. Parcels located within the boundaries of the CSA will be assessed for the operation and services associated with the TDM Program as described herein within the report, if they receive a special and direct benefit from the services. Furthermore, the identification and separation of general benefits from the special benefits follows for CSA M-31. Special benefits are conferred on property within the CSA from the TDM Program and associated services by enhancing the desirability of property within the CSA due to the additional methods of vehicular and pedestrian access available to property, by increasing access to transit related services, providing economic opportunities, driving community growth and revitalization, and by reducing levels of traffic congestion within the CSA. Properties outside of CSA M-31 do not enjoy the Transportation Demand Management Program and the associated services by the CSA and therefore property outside the boundaries of the CSA do not receive the special benefits. The services within the CSA was specifically designed and created to provide additional and improved public resources for the direct advantage of property inside the CSA, and not the public at large. The boundaries of the CSA have been narrowly drawn to include only those parcels that receive a direct advantage from the services. In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners receive within the CSA from the services, it has been determined that no general benefits are associated with TDM services within CSA M-31 because the conferred special benefits that are provided to the assessed property are not provided to other parcels and which real property in general and the public at large do not share. The annual assessment pays for the TDM Program and associated services provided within CSA M-31. The enhanced public services provided within CSA M-31 confer a special benefit to property in the CSA. Transportation Demand Management services associated with CSA M-31 are only provided to parcels within the CSA and are not provided to the general public. Without the assessments, the parcels located in the unincorporated area would receive no Transportation Demand Management Program services. Therefore, the services provided in CSA M-31 are 100% special benefit to the parcels within the CSA. CSA M-31 Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 8 - Methodology The total operation and maintenance costs for the extended public services are apportioned in accordance with the methodology that is consistent with standard practices. Developed Residential Property: Developed Residential Property consists of property which has had a residential building permit issued prior to April 30 and is classified by the County Assessor’s office as single-family residential, multi-family residential, apartment, condominium, townhome, townhouse, co-op, cluster home, or any other type of property which has been developed for residential use for which occupants live and occupy for extended periods of time. Developed Residential Property does not include hotel and motel use. Developed Commercial Property: Developed Commercial Property consists of property which has had a commercial building permit issued prior to April 30 and is classified by the County Assessor’s office as commercial property. Developed Commercial Property includes, but is not limited to, retail stores and shopping centers, office buildings, conference centers, hotels and motels, or any other type of property which has been developed for commercial use. Exempt Property: Exempt Property consists of property not classified as Developed Residential Property or Developed Commercial Property. However, Exempt Property does include property that has been previously classified as Developed Residential Property or Developed Commercial Property which has subsequently had the building structure located on the parcel demolished prior to April 30. This parcel would then remain as an Exempt Property until such time another building permit is issued prior to April 30 to reclassify the parcel as Developed Residential Property or Developed Commercial Property. Exempt Property also includes: parking lots, parking garages, roadways, open space and undeveloped property for which a building permit has not been issued prior to April 30. The methodology for calculating the service charge per parcel for the Services is explained below. Developed Residential Property - It is anticipated that not all of the TDM programs will be provided to the Developed Residential Property owners. The most viable programs to reduce the number of single occupied vehicular trips are the Shuttle Program in conjunction with the Marketing Program. The cost to provide these programs to the Developed Residential Property owners at build-out was estimated to be $28,386.36 per year (in FY 2007-08 dollars). Since each residential unit is similar in size and receives the same degree of benefit from the residential TDM programs, each residential unit is charged an equal share of the Residential TDM program costs. It is anticipated that there will be 522 residential units at build-out. Therefore, in Fiscal Year 2007- 08 the maximum annual assessment was set at $54.38 per residential unit. Developed Commercial Property - It is anticipated that all TDM programs will be provided to the Developed Commercial Property owners. The cost to provide these TDM services to Developed Commercial Property owners at build-out was estimated to be $238,121.84 per year (in FY 2007-08 dollars). For Developed Commercial Property, the amount of building floor area directly correlates to the number of potential employees located on each parcel. These total floor area numbers are used to calculate the proportional special benefit received by each Developed Commercial Parcel within the District. Building floor area is defined by the gross square footage of the buildings exclusive of parking. The building square footage is shown on the Assessment List on the following page and serves as the basis for calculation of the annual assessments for Developed Commercial Property. It is anticipated that there will be 2,487,190 square feet of commercial development at build-out. Therefore, in Fiscal Year 2007-08 the maximum annual assessment rate per sq. ft. was set at $0.0957 per square foot. CSA M-31 Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 9 - Assessment Rate The maximum assessment rates may be adjusted annually to reflect the prior year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for the Bay Area: San Francisco-Oakland- San Jose. The base CPI is June 2007 (216.123). Any change in the assessment rate, which is the result of the change in the CPI shall not be deemed an increase in the assessment subject to the requirements of Proposition 218. For Fiscal Year 2019-20 the allowed maximum rate is shown below and has been calculated as follows: The February 2019 CPI is 291.227; this is a 3.53% increase over the February 2018 CPI. Developed Residential $70.78/residential unit in Fiscal Year 2018-19 +3.53% CPI increase for FY 2019-20 = $73.28 Developed Commercial $0.1246/square foot in Fiscal Year 2018-19 +3.53% CPI increase for FY 2019-20 = $0.1290 In Fiscal Year 2019-20, it is recommended based upon projected expenditures, that the maximum rate of $73.28/residential unit and $0.1290/square foot be collected. It is estimated $336,218.30 in revenue will be needed to provide the services referenced above in Fiscal Year 2019-20. CSA M-31 Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 10 - SERVICE CHARGE ROLL A list, of those parcels to be charged for Fiscal Year 2019-20, including a description of each parcel to be charged is included on the following page. SERVICE CHARGE ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 CSA M-31 Contra Costa Centre Transit Village Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor Parcel Number Estimated Commercial Building Sq. Ft. Estimated Residential Units Residential Rate Commercial Rate FY 2019-20 Assessment Property Owner Name 148-202-057 $6,579.00 51,000 0 $0.00 $0.1290 LANE 520 ALMANOR LLC 148-221-033 $13,158.00102,000 0 $0.00 $0.1290 HOFMANN HOLDINGS LP 148-221-040 $14,656.00 0 200 $73.28 $0.1290 SAN FRANCISCO BART 148-221-041 $17,127.16 16,316 200 $73.28 $0.1290 SAN FRANCISCO BART 148-221-042 $16,821.38 25,875 185 $73.28 $0.1290 SAN FRANCISCO BART 148-221-044 $2,418.24 0 37 $73.28 $0.1290 SAN FRANCISCO BART 148-250-083 $27,915.60216,400 0 $0.00 $0.1290 ASHFORD WALNUT CREEK LP 148-250-090 $26,535.30205,700 0 $0.00 $0.1290 DWF V 2999 OAK LLC 148-270-050 $3,870.00 30,000 0 $0.00 $0.1290 NOR CAL CO L P 148-470-001 $48,375.00375,000 0 $0.00 $0.1290 MLM TREAT TOWERS 148-480-011 $25,155.00195,000 0 $0.00 $0.1290 55 OAKWC OWNER LLC 148-480-014 $32,923.12255,218 0 $0.00 $0.1290 CSAA INTER-INSURANCE 172-011-022 $32,701.50253,500 0 $0.00 $0.1290 CSHV PACIFIC PLAZA LLC 172-020-042 $16,125.00125,000 0 $0.00 $0.1290 PERA URBAN WEST CORP 172-020-047 $25,800.00200,000 0 $0.00 $0.1290 WILSON THOMAS D 172-031-022 $10,320.00 80,000 0 $0.00 $0.1290 JOHN MUIR MEDICAL CENTER 172-031-023 $15,738.00122,000 0 $0.00 $0.1290 1450 TREAT BOULEVARD INC $336,218.30Total 622 2,253,009 05/06/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAM_31\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa m-31.frx - m31_1920t.dbf - 11 - APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jessi Duffy (925)313-2286 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, Brian Brown, Francisco & Associates, Inc., Slava Gospodchikov - Engineering Services , Diana Oyler - Finance , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts, Jessi Duffy- Special Districts D. 7 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:HEARING on Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area T-1; ADOPT resolution confirming the report and assessing charges. RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) 1. RECEIVE from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in County Service Area (CSA) T-1, a copy of which is attached. 2. OPEN the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; RECEIVE and CONSIDER all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and CLOSE the public hearing. 3. CONSIDER whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated assessment charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. 4. APPROVE the estimated assessment charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. 5. ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/136, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. 6. DIRECT the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Final Annual Report for CSA T-1 that conforms to the County’s official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area T-1 Funds) (District III) Project No. 7480-6X5058. FISCAL IMPACT: The levy of the annual assessment charges in CSA T-1 will provide revenues for public transit services. The CSA T-1 annual total assessment was $574,214.77 for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 and will be $606,989.88 in Fiscal Year 2019-2020. The increase is based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area (All Urban Consumers). The number of parcels assessed increased from 1,123 in Fiscal Year 2018-2019 to 1,151 in Fiscal Year 2019-2020. The assessment charge was $437.74/developed equivalent dwelling unit in Fiscal Year 2018-2019 and will be $453.18/developed equivalent dwelling unit in Fiscal Year 2019-2020. BACKGROUND: As directed by Article 1012-2.602 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, the Public Works Director prepared a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in CSA T-1 and filed it with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. CSA T-1 provides public transit services. The Tentative Annual Report contains a description of each parcel of real property receiving services, the basic assessment charge for CSA T-1 and the estimated amount of the assessment charge for each parcel for the fiscal year. Upon the filing of the Tentative Annual Report, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors fixed a time, date and place for a Board hearing on the Tentative Annual Report and for filing objections or protests thereto, and published a notice of the hearing as provided in Government Code section 6066. Following the public hearing, the Board may adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated assessment charge, and shall make its determination upon each estimated assessment charge as described in the Tentative Annual Report. The assessment charges in the Tentative Annual Report were computed and apportioned according to a formula that fairly distributes the assessment charge among all subject parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits they will receive from the services provided. Staff recommends approval of the assessment charges in the Tentative Annual Report without modification. The assessment charges in the Tentative Annual Report are higher than the charges levied in Fiscal Year 2018-2019 because they incorporate an automatic adjustment approved by the parcel owners in CSA T-1 in 2006. The adjustment provision allows for an increase each year based upon the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco Bay Area (All Urban Consumers). For Fiscal Year 2019-2020 the increase is 3.53% over the Fiscal Year 2018-2019 assessment rates. The Board approved this provision on January 17, 2006. Adoption of Resolution 2019/136 confirms the Tentative Annual Report and assesses the charges set forth therein, but does not levy the charges. The levy of the assessment charges occurs after the preparation of a Final Annual Report that conforms to the official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. The official assessment roll will be issued by the County Assessor on or about July 1, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for CSA T-1 is not confirmed, either as filed or as modified, the assessment charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report may not be levied for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. Therefore, the District would be unable to provide public transit services, or an alternate source of funding would have to be identified. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Received from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on assessment charges in County Service Area (CSA) T-1. Opened the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; received and considered all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and closed the public hearing. Considered whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated assessment charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Approved the estimated assessment charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Adopted Resolution No. 2019/136, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. Directed the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Final Annual Report for CSA T-1 that conforms to the County’s official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area T-1 Funds) (District III) Project No. 7480-6X5058. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2019/136 Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 CCC Service Area T-1 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2019/136 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/136 IN THE MATTER OF: Confirmation of the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area T-1 (Danville area); WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has prepared a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area (CSA) T-1 and filed it with the Clerk of the Board pursuant to Article 1012-2.6 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code; WHEREAS, the Clerk of the Board has fixed a time, date and place for a public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report and published notice of the hearing as provided in Government Code section 6066; WHEREAS, the Board conducted the public hearing on June 11, 2019, and considered all written and oral testimony, including any and all objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; WHEREAS, the Tentative Annual Report contains a description of each parcel of real property receiving public transit services within CSA T-1, the basic assessment charge for CSA T-1, and the estimated assessment charge amount for each parcel in Fiscal Year 2019-2020; WHEREAS, the assessment charges in the Tentative Annual Report were computed and apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the assessment charge among all subject parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits conferred on each property from the public transit services provided within CSA T-1; and WHEREAS, the Board finds no cause to revise, change, reduce, increase or modify any estimated assessment charge contained in the Tentative Annual Report; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The Board hereby CONFIRMS the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for CSA T-1 and assesses the charges set forth in the report. Contact: Jessi Duffy (925)313-2286 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, Brian Brown, Francisco & Associates, Inc., Slava Gospodchikov - Engineering Services , Diana Oyler - Finance , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts, Jessi Duffy- Special Districts TENTATIVE ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SERVICE AREA T-1 (Public Transit) June 11, 2019 Board of Supervisors John Gioia, District 1 Candace Andersen, District 2 Diane Burgis, District 3 Karen Mitchoff, District 4 Federal Glover, District 5 Prepared by Contra Costa County Public Works Department CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 1 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION In 2008 a development project commonly known as the Integrated Project (“Project”) was permitted in the unincorporated area of Contra Costa County, just east of the Town of Danville. The project is also known as Alamo Creek/Intervening Properties Development and constitutes approximately 767 acres located south of Camino Tassajara between Hansen Lane and Finley Road. Wilbur Smith Associates (WSA) completed a Transit Improvements Study of the Project in March 2005. The study acknowledged that a limited market for transit services and consequently a limited transit service is offered in the study area. The study concluded that a latent demand for transit could be satisfied if a regular commuter service were provided. Given the size of the Integrated Project and the workplace destination and commuting behavior of the adjacent census tracts as outlined by a census-based demographic analysis, a weekday rush-hour commuter service would provide the greatest benefit of transit services under consideration. Specifically, the report recommended that the proposed transit service include the Walnut Creek Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) station and Bishop Ranch business park as destinations. The desired level of service was based on an analysis of demand performed by WSA. Based on census information and a rider survey performed by BART in 1998, approximately 77 transit trips per day may be expected when the project development is completed. The transit trip total was calculated by WSA as follows:  As presented in the final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Project, 10,048 daily vehicle trips would be generated at the development;  Assuming an average vehicle occupancy of 1.05 persons per vehicle and a 92.5% vehicle mode share (automobiles constitute 92.5% of transit trips to and from the households), 13,338 person trips would be generated daily by the development;  Based on census information, 5.37% of commuter trips to and from adjacent census tracts used public transit (716 trips);  Approximately 97% of public transit trips used rail (assumed to be exclusive to BART; 694 trips);  Approximately 7% of BART riders at stations nearest to the project (Dublin/Pleasanton, Walnut Creek, Lafayette) used public transit to travel to and from the station (48 trips);  Approximately 4% of transit-based commuter trips used bus service as the primary means of transportation (29 trips); and  Total bus demand (77 trips) includes the sum of transit trips to BART stations (48 trips) and bus trips to work (29 trips). On June 14, 2005, the Board of Supervisors approved Resolution No. 2005/357 which recommended to Local Agency Formation Commission of Contra Costa County (LAFCO) the formation of County Service Area (CSA) T-1, Public Transit in the Danville Area. The services provided by CSA T-1 are: 1. Extended public transit services. 2. Implementation of Transportation Demand Management programs as discussed in this report and in the Plan for Providing Services for CSA T-1 which is on file with LAFCO. On September 14, 2005, LAFCO conducted a public hearing and subsequently approved Resolution 05-15 which formed CSA T-1. CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 2 - On October 18, 2005, Resolution 2005/674 stated that the transit services should be supported by a benefit assessment on parcels that receive this special and distinct benefit. On January 17, 2006, the Board of Supervisors conducted a public hearing and subsequently approved Resolution 2006/21 which authorized the annual levy of assessments on the parcels located within CSA T-1 to fund extended public transit services. CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 3 - CURRENT ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION Pursuant to County Ordinance Section 1012-2.6, former County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 25210.77a), and current County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 24210.3, subd. (d)), the Tentative Annual Report has been filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, public notice has been given as required, and the Board conducted a Public Hearing and then made a determination on each estimated service charge in the tentative report. Contra Costa Board of Supervisors reviewed the Tentative Annual Report in accordance with Resolution No. 2019/136, on June 11, 2019, and conducted a Public Hearing in connection with the proceedings for CSA T-1. Upon adoption of the Final Annual Report by the Board of Supervisors, the charges contained herein will be collected on the property tax roll of Contra Costa County in the same manner, by the same persons, at the same time as, and together with the County's property taxes. Legal Authority As required by County Ordinance Section 1012-2.6, former County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 25210.77a), and current County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 24210.3, subd. (d)), the Tentative Annual Report includes the following minimum information as shown in the Service Charge Roll: 1. A description of each parcel of real property receiving the miscellaneous extended service; 2. The basic service charge; 3. The estimated amount of the service charge for each parcel for such year; and 4. A parcel list identifying each parcel receiving services that allows parcel owners to find their property on the list and determine the proposed charge. This annual report also includes an estimate of annual costs and the method of apportionment as additional information to allow the reader to better understand what services are being paid for, what is the total annual cost for the services provided, and how the cost of services is spread to each individual parcel. Transit Service Implementation Two transportation studies were previously conducted to understand potential transit usage and travel patterns in CSA T-1. The transportation studies are Alamo Creek/Intervening Properties Transit Improvement Study by WSA in 2005 and Transit Service Survey and Report for CSA T-1 Transit District by DKS Associates in 2010. Based on these studies, the following transit service plan is to be implemented in three phases as summarized below: 1. Short – Term (completed in 2012): Community Outreach The short-term strategy focused on community outreach to educate the residents about existing transportation options in Contra Costa County, and to seek their feedback. The community outreach program involved flyer preparation, flyer distribution, and resident feedback. This outreach effort attempted to identify commuter destinations for potential vanpools, in advance of a vanpool/shuttle transit program. CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 4 - 2. Mid-Term: Vanpool/Shuttle Transit Program Based on the feedback provided by the residents, the mid-term strategy would involve a vanpool and/or shuttle service since the market for a full scale fixed route Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (County Connection) bus is not warranted at this time. CSA T-1’s plan is to engage the residents to try public transit and build up the necessary public transit demand for a full scale fixed route bus. In response to CSA T-1’s plan, County Connection agreed to provide a demand response, flexible shuttle for CSA T-1 residents during the commute hours. The exact routes were to be determined by demand. Riders must be traveling from or to CSA T-1. The service area is limited to the 1.5 mile corridors along Camino Tassajara (between CSA T-1 and I-680) and I-680 (between Walnut Creek and Pleasant Hill BART stations). Riders contact County Connection to request and reserve services. Based on the demand, County Connection will determine the most efficient route for the shuttle. The table below summarizes the ridership data since the service began on January 24, 2014. It shows a constant increase in riders annually and the positive effect the public transit of CSA T-1 has on removing peak hours and daily trips from local and regional roadways. The riders get picked up from their home in the CSA T-1 service area during the morning period and get picked up from the Walnut Creek BART station during the evening period. The average operating cost per passenger is comparable to the average cost for County Connection’s Paratransit (LINK) service. CSA T-1 has observed the ridership has increased overtime, and more residents are utilizing the public transit service provided by CSA T-1. However, the ridership demand has not achieved the level that warrants a full scale fixed route bus. CSA T-1 will continue this mid-term program to provide the shuttle service until there is enough public transit demand for a full scale fixed route bus. CSA T- 1 has amended the service agreement with County Connection to continue the shuttle service. In addition to County Connection’s shuttle, CSA T-1 will also fund another service with the Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency (TRAFFIX). TRAFFIX is a traffic congestion relief program implemented in 2009 and operated cooperatively by Contra Costa County, City of San Ramon, San Ramon Valley Unified School District, and Town of Danville to reduce traffic congestion caused by children being driven to and from school in the San Ramon area. As mentioned above, although the demand for a full scale fixed Year of Service Riders per day Number of peak hours & daily trips removed from roadways 2014 16 32 2015 17 to 18 34 to 36 2016 19 38 2017 21 42 * Ridership data is provided by County Connection. Summary of ridership data per year* CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 5 - route County Connection bus is not warranted at this time, CSA T-1 recognized there is already a demand for school bus services. While awaiting for transit demand to increase, CSA T-1’s interim plan is to participate in providing school bus services as an interim method to reduce congestion. TRAFFIX provided data indicating there are approximately 205 students residing within CSA T-1 who attend Monte Vista High School. TRAFFIX considers 50 students as a full bus. If approximately 25 percent of the eligible students participated, a bus would be full. It was anticipated that at least 50 students would participate; resulting in a full bus. This service began in the Fall of 2014 for the 2014/15 school year. TRAFFIX reported 70 passes were sold for both the 2014/15 and 2015/16 school years. This is equivalent of removing approximately 280 trips from the roadway each school day. In 2017, funds were allocated to fund a second TRAFFIX bus to provide services to the CSA T-1 area. This decision was based on the increased demand for seats in the route. A third bus is being planned for 2019/20. 3. Long-Term Goal (2018 and beyond): County Connection Service The long-term strategy would involve expanding the vanpool/shuttle service and providing full-scale County Connection bus service, if the existing service proves successful and more commuter transit demand is demonstrated. An approximate yearly operating cost of running a full-length bus service with County Connection is estimated to be $204,000 per bus. This estimate is based on $100 per hour for 8 hours a day during morning and evening peak commute hours for 255 days a year. CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 6 - ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL COST The Fiscal Year 2018-19 projected and Fiscal Year 2019-20 proposed revenues and expenditures are shown below. A special fund has been set up for the collection of revenues and expenditures for CSA T-1. Incidental expenses including administration, engineering fees, legal fees and all other costs associated with the Public Transit services may be included. When CSA T-1 was formed, a financial analysis was performed to provide the framework for an operating budget for the proposed transit service. This was based on the estimated expenses for continuing operations provided by WSA. In preparation of the budget, several factors were considered including:  Level of Transit Service  Phasing of Service  Equal benefit (and equal assessment level) to residents based on projected resident population In order to establish a reasonable reserve in the early years following formation of the CSA, revenues have been collected since Fiscal Year 2006-07. For Fiscal Year 2019-20, it is estimated there will be a surplus of funds. These funds are being set aside into Capital Reserves to purchase vehicles or fund a full-scale fixed route County Connection bus to provide the services to this area when applicable. Revenues collected from the charge shall be used only for the expenditures represented in this report. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year. CSA T‐1 Danville Public Transit FY 2018‐19 FY 2019‐20 Fund 248000 Org 7480 Projected Proposed Carry over from prior year: $ 2,513,627.73 $ 2,694,559.12 Revenue: Earnings on Investment 26,240.51$ 27,000.00$ Taxes and Assessments 547,974.26$ 579,989.88$ TOTAL CURRENT REVENUE $ 574,214.77 $ 606,989.88 Total Revenue + Carryover:3,087,842.50$ 3,301,549.00$ Expenditures: Publications & Legal Notices (Bay Area News)150.00$ 200.00$ CCCTA Trans portation Agreement 180,604.00$ 200,000.00$ TRAFFIX Transportation Agreement 182,420.96$ 300,000.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (W-Trans, Francisco)5,363.16$ 4,500.00$ Other Special Dept Expense -$ 2,769,649.00$ Taxes and Assessments 1,701.31$ 2,000.00$ Interfund Exp - Gov/Gov (Investment Fees )174.00$ 200.00$ Interfund Exp - Gov/Gov (County Counsel)2,000.00$ 3,000.00$ Print & Mail 1,000.00$ 2,000.00$ Reimbursements - Gov/Gov (County Staff)19,869.95$ 20,000.00$ Total Expenditures 393,283.38$ 3,301,549.00$ FUND BALANCE AVAILABLE 2,694,559.12$ ‐$ CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 7 - BOUNDARY MAP The general boundaries of the CSA are shown herein. The lines and dimensions of each parcel within the CSA are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year in which this report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. A copy of the Boundary Map is shown on the following page. Contra Costa County Service Area (CSA) T-1(Public Transit)Boundary Map CAMINO TASSAJARA ¯ 600 0 600 1,200300 FeetMONTEROSSO STCASABLANCA ST CH A R B R A Y S T Diablo VistaSchoolBall Fields Legend CSA T-1 Boundary Parcel Lines Parcels within CSA T-1 CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 9 - METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT Special vs. General Benefit On November 5, 1996 California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote On Taxes Act" which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for fees, charges and benefit assessments. Proposition 218 procedures stipulate that even if charges or benefit assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, future increases in the charges or benefit assessments must comply with the provisions of Proposition 218. However, if the future increase in the charge or benefit assessment were anticipated in the charge or benefit assessment formula when approved by property owners (e.g., consumer price index increases or a predetermined cap) then the future increase in the charge or benefit assessment would be in compliance with the intent and provisions of Proposition 218. Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and defines a special benefit as a particular and distinct benefit conferred on real property and not a general benefit received by the public at large. Parcels located within the boundaries of the CSA will be assessed for the operation and services associated with the transit services provided as described herein within the report, if they receive a special and direct benefit from the services. Furthermore, the identification and separation of general benefits from the special benefits follows for CSA T-1. Special Benefits are conferred on property within the CSA from transit services by enhancing the desirability of property within the CSA due to the additional methods of vehicular and pedestrian access available to and from property, by providing increased access to transit related services, providing economic opportunities, driving community growth and revitalization, and by reducing levels of traffic congestion within the CSA. Properties outside of CSA T-1 in other parts of the County may not enjoy the transit services made available by the CSA and therefore property outside the boundaries of the CSA do not receive the special benefits. The services within the CSA was specifically designed and created to provide additional and improved public resources for the direct advantage of property inside the CSA, and not the public at large. In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners receive within the CSA from the services, it has been determined that no general benefits are associated with the transit services provided within CSA T-1 because the conferred special benefits that are provided to the assessed property are not provided to the public at large. The annual assessment pays for the transit related services provided within CSA T-1. The enhanced public services provided within CSA T-1 confer a special benefit and only serve the parcels with the ability to utilize the transit related services provided. Without the services, the property located in the unincorporated area would not receive any transit services. Therefore, the services in CSA T-1 are 100 percent special benefit to the parcels within the CSA. CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 10 - Methodology The total operation, maintenance and servicing cost for Public Transit are apportioned in accordance with the methodology that is consistent with standard assessment engineering practices. The method for distributing the costs to each parcel is based on the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor. Since the assessment is levied on the owners of properties as shown on the tax rolls, the final charges must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be distributed by parcel, not considering land use, this would not be equitable because a single-family parcel would be paying the same as a 50-unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment. Therefore, as previously stated, the total assessment costs are distributed to each parcel of land based on the number of EDUs associated with each particular parcel. No commercial or industrial parcels are planned be included in within CSA T-1, therefore an assessment methodology has not been created for those uses. The methodology used to assign EDUs to other land uses in proportion to the benefit they receive relative to the single family residential parcel is shown below. Developed Single Family Residential - The developed single family parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of the benefit assessments. This basic unit shall be called an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Parcels designated as developed single family residential uses per the Contra Costa County land use code are assessed one (1.00) EDU. In addition, those parcels that are designated as “vacant” single family residential per the Contra Costa County land use code, but have a building permit issued prior to April 30 are assessed one (1.00) EDU. Developed Multiple Residential – The developed multi-family designation includes parcels designated as apartments, townhomes, and condominiums per the Contra Costa County land use code. Apartments are assessed a factor of 0.723270448 EDU per dwelling unit. For example, a parcel with a 100-unit apartment would be assessed 72.33 EDUs. Townhomes and condominiums are assessed a factor of 0.795597484 EDU per dwelling unit. In addition, those parcels that are designated as “vacant” multi-family residential per the Contra Costa County land use code, but have a building permit issued prior to April 30, are assessed on a per unit basis as shown above. Exempt Property - Consists of property not classified as developed residential property and includes: commercial, industrial, recreational and institutional property; parking lots; parking garages; roadways; open space and undeveloped property on which a building permit has not been issued prior to April 30. In addition, Senior Housing is classified as exempt. Residents of Senior Housing will be provided with separate shuttle service not included within the scope of the CSA. In Fiscal Year 2006-07 the maximum annual assessment was set at $318.00 per EDU. To determine the cost per parcel, the total budget for providing service to the current total service area was divided by the total number of EDU’s within the service area. Please refer to Contra Costa County Resolution 2006-21 for a detailed report that includes the initial calculation of this rate. The maximum assessment rates may be adjusted annually to reflect 2% or the prior year’s change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for All Urban Consumers for the Bay Area: San Francisco- Oakland-San Jose, whichever is greater. The base CPI index to be used for future calculations is February 2006 (207.1). Any change in the assessment rate per EDU, which is the result of the CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 11 - change in the CPI shall not be deemed an increase in the assessment subject to the requirements of Proposition 218. For Fiscal Year 2019-20 the allowed maximum rate is $437.74/EDU. This rate has been calculated as follows: $437.74 per developed EDU in Fiscal Year 2018-19 +3.53% increase for FY 2019-20 = $453.18 In Fiscal Year 2019-20, it is recommended based upon projected expenditures, that the maximum rate of $453.18 be collected. It is estimated $579,989.88 in revenue will be needed to provide the services referenced above in Fiscal Year 2019-20. There are 1,279.82 EDUs that have had a building permit issued. If you divide $579,989.88 by 1,279.82 EDUs, the service charge per parcel is $453.18. CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 12 - SERVICE CHARGE ROLL A list, of those parcels to be charged for Fiscal Year 2019-20, including a description of each parcel to be charged is included on the following pages. CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 TENTATIVE SERVICE CHARGE ROLL Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-030-082 $39,332.363000 DAMANI CTMFR 206-580-001 $453.18100 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-002 $453.18106 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-003 $453.18112 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-004 $453.18118 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-005 $453.18124 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-006 $453.18130 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-007 $453.18136 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-008 $453.18142 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-009 $453.18148 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-010 $453.18154 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-011 $453.18160 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-012 $453.18166 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-013 $453.18172 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-014 $453.18178 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-015 $453.18184 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-016 $453.18190 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-017 $453.18196 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-018 $453.18202 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-019 $453.18208 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-020 $453.18214 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-021 $453.18220 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-022 $453.18226 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-023 $453.18232 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-024 $453.18238 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-025 $453.18244 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-026 $453.18250 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-027 $453.18125 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-028 $453.18133 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-029 $453.18139 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-030 $453.18149 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-031 $453.18157 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-032 $453.18193 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-033 $453.18205 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-034 $453.18211 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-035 $453.18217 NANTERRE STSFR 206-580-037 $31,464.98NANTERRE STMFR 206-590-001 $453.18305 COTTSWALD CTSFR 206-590-002 $453.18317 COTTSWALD CTSFR 206-590-003 $453.18336 COTTSWALD CTSFR 206-590-004 $453.18324 COTTSWALD CTSFR 206-590-005 $453.18312 COTTSWALD CTSFR 206-590-006 $453.18300 COTTSWALD CTSFR 206-590-007 $453.18403 RIOJA CTSFR 206-590-008 $453.18409 RIOJA CTSFR 206-590-009 $453.18415 RIOJA CTSFR 206-590-010 $453.18421 RIOJA CTSFR 206-590-011 $453.18427 RIOJA CTSFR 206-590-012 $453.18426 RIOJA CTSFR 206-590-013 $453.18420 RIOJA CTSFR 206-590-014 $453.18414 RIOJA CTSFR 206-590-015 $453.18408 RIOJA CTSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-590-016 $453.18402 RIOJA CTSFR 206-590-017 $453.18501 MANTOVA CTSFR 206-590-018 $453.18509 MANTOVA CTSFR 206-590-019 $453.18517 MANTOVA CTSFR 206-590-020 $453.18525 MANTOVA CTSFR 206-590-021 $453.18533 MANTOVA CTSFR 206-590-022 $453.181524 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-590-023 $453.181518 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-590-024 $453.181512 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-590-025 $453.181506 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-590-026 $453.181500 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-590-027 $453.18101 MENTON CTSFR 206-590-028 $453.18109 MENTON CTSFR 206-590-029 $453.18117 MENTON CTSFR 206-590-030 $453.18125 MENTON CTSFR 206-590-031 $453.18124 MENTON CTSFR 206-590-032 $453.18116 MENTON CTSFR 206-590-033 $453.18108 MENTON CTSFR 206-590-034 $453.18100 MENTON CTSFR 206-590-035 $453.181780 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-036 $453.181772 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-037 $453.181764 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-038 $453.18215 GAMAY CTSFR 206-590-039 $453.18227 GAMAY CTSFR 206-590-040 $453.18239 GAMAY CTSFR 206-590-041 $453.18236 GAMAY CTSFR 206-590-042 $453.18224 GAMAY CTSFR 206-590-043 $453.18212 GAMAY CTSFR 206-590-044 $453.18200 GAMAY CTSFR 206-590-045 $453.181748 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-046 $453.181740 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-047 $453.181736 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-048 $453.181724 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-049 $453.181716 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-050 $453.181708 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-051 $453.181700 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-052 $453.181703 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-053 $453.181711 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-054 $453.181719 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-055 $453.181727 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-056 $453.181735 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-057 $453.181743 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-058 $453.181844 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-059 $453.181838 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-060 $453.181832 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-061 $453.181826 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-062 $453.181820 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-063 $453.181814 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-064 $453.181808 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-065 $453.181802 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-066 $453.181801 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-067 $453.181807 RIOJA STSFR - 13 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSA T-1\FY19-20\FOXPRO\troll_csa t-1.frx - ct_11920t.dbf 05/06/19 CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 TENTATIVE SERVICE CHARGE ROLL Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-590-068 $453.181813 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-069 $453.181819 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-070 $453.181825 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-071 $453.181831 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-072 $453.181837 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-073 $453.181843 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-074 $453.181849 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-075 $453.181855 RIOJA STSFR 206-590-076 $453.181767 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-077 $453.181775 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-078 $453.181783 COTTSWALD STSFR 206-590-079 $453.181423 MENTON STSFR 206-590-080 $453.181429 MENTON STSFR 206-590-081 $453.181976 MANTOVA STSFR 206-590-082 $453.181968 MANTOVA STSFR 206-590-083 $453.181960 MANTOVA STSFR 206-590-084 $453.181952 MANTOVA STSFR 206-590-085 $453.181944 MANTOVA STSFR 206-590-086 $453.181936 MANTOVA STSFR 206-590-087 $453.181928 MANTOVA STSFR 206-590-088 $453.181920 MANTOVA STSFR 206-590-089 $453.181912 MANTOVA STSFR 206-590-090 $453.181904 MANTOVA STSFR 206-600-001 $453.18536 MANTOVA CTSFR 206-600-002 $453.18528 MANTOVA CTSFR 206-600-003 $453.18520 MANTOVA CTSFR 206-600-004 $453.18512 MANTOVA CTSFR 206-600-005 $453.18504 MANTOVA CTSFR 206-600-006 $453.18605 COLMAR CTSFR 206-600-007 $453.18611 COLMAR CTSFR 206-600-008 $453.18617 COLMAR CTSFR 206-600-009 $453.18623 COLMAR CTSFR 206-600-010 $453.18629 COLMAR CTSFR 206-600-011 $453.18624 COLMAR CTSFR 206-600-012 $453.18618 COLMAR CTSFR 206-600-013 $453.18612 COLMAR CTSFR 206-600-014 $453.18606 COLMAR CTSFR 206-600-015 $453.18600 COLMAR CTSFR 206-600-016 $453.18703 GENOA CTSFR 206-600-017 $453.18711 GENOA CTSFR 206-600-018 $453.18719 GENOA CTSFR 206-600-019 $453.18727 GENOA CTSFR 206-600-020 $453.18735 GENOA CTSFR 206-600-021 $453.181903 MANTOVA STSFR 206-600-022 $453.181911 MANTOVA STSFR 206-600-023 $453.181919 MANTOVA STSFR 206-600-024 $453.181927 MANTOVA STSFR 206-600-025 $453.181935 MANTOVA STSFR 206-600-026 $453.181943 MANTOVA STSFR 206-600-027 $453.181951 MANTOVA STSFR 206-600-028 $453.181959 MANTOVA STSFR 206-600-029 $453.182042 COLMAR STSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-600-030 $453.182036 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-031 $453.182030 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-032 $453.182024 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-033 $453.182018 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-034 $453.182012 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-035 $453.182006 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-036 $453.182000 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-037 $453.182001 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-038 $453.182009 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-039 $453.182017 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-040 $453.182025 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-041 $453.182033 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-042 $453.182041 COLMAR STSFR 206-600-043 $453.182128 CARMENERE STSFR 206-600-044 $453.182134 CARMENERE STSFR 206-600-045 $453.182224 GENOA STSFR 206-600-046 $453.182220 GENOA STSFR 206-600-047 $453.182216 GENOA STSFR 206-600-048 $453.182212 GENOA STSFR 206-600-049 $453.182210 GENOA STSFR 206-600-050 $453.182208 GENOA STSFR 206-600-051 $453.182200 GENOA STSFR 206-600-052 $453.182151 CARMENERE STSFR 206-600-053 $453.182145 CARMENERE STSFR 206-600-054 $453.182139 CARMENERE STSFR 206-600-055 $453.182133 CARMENERE STSFR 206-600-056 $453.182127 CARMENERE STSFR 206-600-057 $453.182121 CARMENERE STSFR 206-600-058 $453.182115 CARMENERE STSFR 206-600-059 $453.182109 CARMENERE STSFR 206-600-060 $453.182103 CARMENERE STSFR 206-600-061 $453.181435 MENTON STSFR 206-600-062 $453.181441 MENTON STSFR 206-600-063 $453.181447 MENTON STSFR 206-600-064 $453.181453 MENTON STSFR 206-600-065 $453.181459 MENTON STSFR 206-600-066 $453.181465 MENTON STSFR 206-600-067 $453.181471 MENTON STSFR 206-600-068 $453.181477 MENTON STSFR 206-600-069 $453.181483 MENTON STSFR 206-600-070 $453.181489 MENTON STSFR 206-600-071 $453.181495 MENTON STSFR 206-610-001 $453.181632 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-002 $453.181626 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-003 $453.181620 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-004 $453.181614 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-005 $453.181608 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-006 $453.181602 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-007 $453.181596 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-008 $453.181590 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-009 $453.181584 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-010 $453.181578 COLCHESTER STSFR - 14 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSA T-1\FY19-20\FOXPRO\troll_csa t-1.frx - ct_11920t.dbf 05/06/19 CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 TENTATIVE SERVICE CHARGE ROLL Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-610-011 $453.181572 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-012 $453.181566 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-013 $453.181560 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-014 $453.181554 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-015 $453.181548 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-016 $453.181542 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-017 $453.181536 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-018 $453.181530 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-019 $453.181432 MENTON STSFR 206-610-020 $453.181438 MENTON STSFR 206-610-021 $453.181444 MENTON STSFR 206-610-022 $453.181450 MENTON STSFR 206-610-023 $453.181456 MENTON STSFR 206-610-024 $453.181462 MENTON STSFR 206-610-025 $453.181468 MENTON STSFR 206-610-026 $453.181474 MENTON STSFR 206-610-027 $453.181480 MENTON STSFR 206-610-028 $453.181486 MENTON STSFR 206-610-029 $453.181492 MENTON STSFR 206-610-030 $453.181498 MENTON STSFR 206-610-031 $453.182262 GENOA STSFR 206-610-032 $453.182268 GENOA STSFR 206-610-033 $453.182274 GENOA STSFR 206-610-034 $453.182280 GENOA STSFR 206-610-035 $453.182286 GENOA STSFR 206-610-036 $453.181617 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-037 $453.181609 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-038 $453.181601 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-610-039 $453.181593 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-620-001 $453.18734 GENOA CTSFR 206-620-002 $453.18726 GENOA CTSFR 206-620-003 $453.18718 GENOA CTSFR 206-620-004 $453.18710 GENOA CTSFR 206-620-005 $453.18702 GENOA CTSFR 206-620-006 $453.18801 MALDON CTSFR 206-620-007 $453.18809 MALDON CTSFR 206-620-008 $453.18817 MALDON CTSFR 206-620-009 $453.18825 MALDON CTSFR 206-620-010 $453.18833 MALDON CTSFR 206-620-011 $453.18828 MALDON CTSFR 206-620-012 $453.18820 MALDON CTSFR 206-620-013 $453.18812 MALDON CTSFR 206-620-014 $453.18804 MALDON CTSFR 206-620-015 $453.181251 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-620-016 $453.181257 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-620-017 $453.181263 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-620-018 $453.181269 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-620-019 $453.181275 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-620-020 $453.181281 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-620-022 $453.182201 GENOA STSFR 206-620-023 $453.182209 GENOA STSFR 206-620-024 $453.182213 GENOA STSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-620-025 $453.182219 GENOA STSFR 206-620-026 $453.182225 GENOA STSFR 206-620-027 $453.182231 GENOA STSFR 206-620-028 $453.182237 GENOA STSFR 206-620-029 $453.182243 GENOA STSFR 206-620-030 $453.182249 GENOA STSFR 206-620-031 $453.182255 GENOA STSFR 206-620-032 $453.182261 GENOA STSFR 206-620-033 $453.182267 GENOA STSFR 206-620-034 $453.182273 GENOA STSFR 206-620-035 $453.182279 GENOA STSFR 206-620-036 $453.181659 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-620-037 $453.18103 RIMINI CTSFR 206-620-038 $453.18111 RIMINI CTSFR 206-620-039 $453.18119 RIMINI CTSFR 206-620-040 $453.18127 RIMINI CTSFR 206-620-041 $453.18132 RIMINI CTSFR 206-620-042 $453.18124 RIMINI CTSFR 206-620-043 $453.18116 RIMINI CTSFR 206-620-044 $453.18108 RIMINI CTSFR 206-620-045 $453.18100 RIMINI CTSFR 206-620-046 $453.181264 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-620-047 $453.181258 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-620-048 $453.181252 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-620-049 $453.181246 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-620-050 $453.18903 TREBBIANO CTSFR 206-620-051 $453.18909 TREBBIANO CTSFR 206-620-052 $453.18915 TREBBIANO CTSFR 206-620-053 $453.18921 TREBBIANO CTSFR 206-620-054 $453.18912 TREBBIANO CTSFR 206-620-055 $453.18906 TREBBIANO CTSFR 206-620-056 $453.18900 TREBBIANO CTSFR 206-620-058 $453.181289 MONTEROSSO CTSFR 206-630-001 $453.181305 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-630-002 $453.181311 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-630-003 $453.181317 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-630-004 $453.181323 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-630-005 $453.181329 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-630-006 $453.181335 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-630-007 $453.182334 GENOA STSFR 206-630-008 $453.182328 GENOA STSFR 206-630-009 $453.182322 GENOA STSFR 206-630-010 $453.182316 GENOA STSFR 206-630-011 $453.182310 GENOA STSFR 206-630-012 $453.182304 GENOA STSFR 206-630-013 $453.18424 MARSANNE CTSFR 206-630-014 $453.18412 MARSANNE CTSFR 206-630-015 $453.18400 MARSANNE CTSFR 206-630-016 $453.181692 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-630-017 $453.181686 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-630-018 $453.181680 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-630-019 $453.181674 COLCHESTER STSFR - 15 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSA T-1\FY19-20\FOXPRO\troll_csa t-1.frx - ct_11920t.dbf 05/06/19 CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 TENTATIVE SERVICE CHARGE ROLL Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-630-020 $453.181668 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-630-021 $453.181662 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-630-022 $453.181656 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-630-023 $453.181650 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-630-024 $453.181644 COLCHESTER STSFR 206-630-025 $453.182466 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-026 $453.182458 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-027 $453.182450 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-028 $453.182442 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-029 $453.182434 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-030 $453.182426 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-031 $453.182418 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-032 $453.182410 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-033 $453.182402 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-034 $453.182403 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-035 $453.182411 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-036 $453.182419 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-037 $453.182427 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-038 $453.182435 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-039 $453.182443 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-040 $453.182451 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-041 $453.182459 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-042 $453.182467 MARSANNE STSFR 206-630-043 $453.182311 GENOA STSFR 206-630-044 $453.182548 MONTREUX STSFR 206-630-045 $453.182542 MONTREUX STSFR 206-630-046 $453.182536 MONTREUX STSFR 206-630-047 $453.182530 MONTREUX STSFR 206-630-048 $453.182524 MONTREUX STSFR 206-630-049 $453.182518 MONTREUX STSFR 206-630-050 $453.182512 MONTREUX STSFR 206-630-051 $453.182506 MONTREUX STSFR 206-630-052 $453.182500 MONTREUX STSFR 206-640-001 $453.181341 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-640-002 $453.181347 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-640-003 $453.181353 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-640-004 $453.181359 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-640-005 $453.181365 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-640-006 $453.18205 MONTEROSSO CTSFR 206-640-007 $453.18211 MONTEROSSO CTSFR 206-640-008 $453.18217 MONTEROSSO CTSFR 206-640-009 $453.18212 MONTEROSSO CTSFR 206-640-010 $453.18206 MONTEROSSO CTSFR 206-640-011 $453.18200 MONTEROSSO CTSFR 206-640-012 $453.18301 LA SPEZIA CTSFR 206-640-013 $453.18309 LA SPEZIA CTSFR 206-640-014 $453.18317 LA SPEZIA CTSFR 206-640-015 $453.18318 LA SPEZIA CTSFR 206-640-016 $453.18310 LA SPEZIA CTSFR 206-640-017 $453.18302 LA SPEZIA CTSFR 206-640-018 $453.182358 GENOA STSFR 206-640-019 $453.182352 GENOA STSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-640-020 $453.182346 GENOA STSFR 206-640-021 $453.182340 GENOA STSFR 206-640-022 $453.182501 MONTREUX STSFR 206-640-023 $453.182509 MONTREUX STSFR 206-640-024 $453.182517 MONTREUX STSFR 206-640-025 $453.182525 MONTREUX STSFR 206-640-026 $453.182533 MONTREUX STSFR 206-640-027 $453.182541 MONTREUX STSFR 206-640-028 $453.182549 MONTREUX STSFR 206-640-029 $453.181398 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-640-030 $453.181392 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-640-031 $453.181386 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-640-032 $453.181380 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-640-033 $453.181374 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-640-034 $453.181368 MONTEROSSO STSFR 206-640-035 $453.18326 LA SPEZIA CTSFR 206-660-001 $453.182186 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-002 $453.182178 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-003 $453.182170 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-004 $453.182162 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-005 $453.182154 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-006 $453.182146 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-007 $453.182138 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-008 $453.182130 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-009 $453.182122 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-010 $453.182114 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-011 $453.183484 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-012 $453.183480 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-013 $453.183476 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-014 $453.183472 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-015 $453.183468 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-016 $453.183464 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-017 $453.183460 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-018 $453.183456 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-019 $453.183452 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-020 $453.183448 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-021 $453.183451 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-022 $453.183457 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-023 $453.183461 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-024 $453.183467 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-025 $453.183473 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-026 $453.183479 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-027 $453.183485 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-028 $453.183491 CASHMERE STSFR 206-660-029 $453.182090 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-030 $453.182082 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-031 $453.182074 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-032 $453.182066 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-033 $453.182058 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-034 $453.182050 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-035 $453.182042 LUSITANO STSFR 206-660-036 $453.18109 ANGORA CTSFR - 16 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSA T-1\FY19-20\FOXPRO\troll_csa t-1.frx - ct_11920t.dbf 05/06/19 CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 TENTATIVE SERVICE CHARGE ROLL Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-660-037 $453.18117 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-038 $453.18125 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-039 $453.18133 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-040 $453.18141 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-041 $453.18145 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-042 $453.18157 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-043 $453.18156 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-044 $453.18148 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-045 $453.18140 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-046 $453.18132 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-047 $453.18124 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-048 $453.18116 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-049 $453.18108 ANGORA CTSFR 206-660-050 $453.18100 ANGORA CTSFR 206-670-001 $453.183101 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-002 $453.183107 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-003 $453.183113 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-004 $453.183119 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-005 $453.183125 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-006 $453.183131 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-007 $453.183137 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-008 $453.183143 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-009 $453.183149 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-010 $453.183155 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-011 $453.183161 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-012 $453.183167 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-013 $453.183173 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-014 $453.183179 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-015 $453.183185 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-016 $453.183191 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-017 $453.18601 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-018 $453.18609 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-019 $453.18617 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-020 $453.18625 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-021 $453.18633 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-022 $453.18641 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-023 $453.18649 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-024 $453.18652 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-025 $453.18644 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-026 $453.18636 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-027 $453.18628 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-028 $453.18620 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-029 $453.18612 MARTINGALE CTSFR 206-670-030 $453.18505 PREAKNESS CTSFR 206-670-031 $453.18515 PREAKNESS CTSFR 206-670-032 $453.18526 PREAKNESS CTSFR 206-670-033 $453.18518 PREAKNESS CTSFR 206-670-034 $453.18510 PREAKNESS CTSFR 206-670-035 $453.18502 PREAKNESS CTSFR 206-670-036 $453.18403 PELHAM CTSFR 206-670-037 $453.18411 PELHAM CTSFR 206-670-038 $453.18419 PELHAM CTSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-670-039 $453.18422 PELHAM CTSFR 206-670-040 $453.18416 PELHAM CTSFR 206-670-041 $453.183172 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-042 $453.183164 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-043 $453.18301 FRIESIAN CTSFR 206-670-044 $453.18309 FRIESIAN CTSFR 206-670-045 $453.18317 FRIESIAN CTSFR 206-670-046 $453.18320 FRIESIAN CTSFR 206-670-047 $453.18312 FRIESIAN CTSFR 206-670-048 $453.183116 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-049 $453.183108 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-670-050 $453.183100 MARTINGALE DRSFR 206-680-001 $453.183444 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-002 $453.183440 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-003 $453.183436 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-004 $453.183432 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-005 $453.183428 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-006 $453.183424 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-007 $453.183420 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-008 $453.183416 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-009 $453.183412 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-010 $453.183408 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-011 $453.183404 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-012 $453.183400 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-013 $453.183401 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-014 $453.183407 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-015 $453.183415 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-016 $453.183421 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-017 $453.183427 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-018 $453.183433 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-019 $453.183439 CASHMERE STSFR 206-680-020 $453.183445 CASHMERE STSFR 206-700-001 $362.54300 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-002 $362.54304 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-003 $362.54308 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-004 $362.54318 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-005 $362.54322 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-006 $362.54326 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-007 $362.54336 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-008 $362.54340 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-009 $362.54344 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-010 $362.54348 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-011 $362.54358 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-012 $362.54362 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-013 $362.54366 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-014 $362.54370 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-015 $362.54380 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-016 $362.54384 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-017 $362.54388 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-018 $362.54392 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-019 $362.54400 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-020 $362.54404 KARELIAN STTWNHM - 17 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSA T-1\FY19-20\FOXPRO\troll_csa t-1.frx - ct_11920t.dbf 05/06/19 CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 TENTATIVE SERVICE CHARGE ROLL Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-700-021 $362.54408 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-022 $362.54420 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-023 $362.54416 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-024 $362.54412 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-025 $362.54430 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-026 $362.54434 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-027 $362.54438 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-028 $362.54450 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-029 $362.54446 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-030 $362.54442 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-031 $362.54435 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-032 $362.54431 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-033 $362.54427 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-034 $362.54417 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-035 $362.54413 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-036 $362.54409 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-037 $362.54399 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-038 $362.54395 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-039 $362.54391 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-040 $362.54381 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-041 $362.54377 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-042 $362.54373 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-043 $362.54369 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-044 $362.54359 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-045 $362.54355 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-046 $362.54351 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-047 $362.54347 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-048 $362.54337 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-049 $362.54333 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-050 $362.54329 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-051 $362.54325 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-052 $362.54315 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-053 $362.54311 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-054 $362.54307 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-055 $362.54303 KARELIAN STTWNHM 206-700-056 $362.54104 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-057 $362.54100 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-058 $362.54296 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-059 $362.54292 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-060 $362.54288 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-061 $362.54278 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-062 $362.54274 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-063 $362.54270 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-064 $362.54266 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-065 $362.54256 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-066 $362.54252 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-067 $362.54248 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-068 $362.54244 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-069 $362.54234 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-070 $362.54230 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-071 $362.54226 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-072 $362.54222 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-700-073 $362.54212 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-074 $362.54208 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-075 $362.54204 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-076 $362.54200 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-077 $362.5411 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-078 $362.5415 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-079 $362.5419 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-080 $362.5423 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-081 $362.5433 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-082 $362.5437 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-083 $362.5441 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-084 $362.5445 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-085 $362.5438 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-086 $362.5434 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-087 $362.5430 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-088 $362.5426 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-089 $362.5422 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-090 $362.5418 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-091 $362.5414 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-092 $362.5410 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-093 $362.54192 CHANNI CTTWNHM 206-700-094 $362.54188 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-095 $362.54184 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-096 $362.54180 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-097 $362.54170 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-098 $362.54166 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-099 $362.54162 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-100 $362.54158 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-101 $362.54148 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-102 $362.54144 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-103 $362.54140 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-104 $362.54136 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-105 $362.54126 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-106 $362.54122 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-107 $362.54118 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-108 $362.54114 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-109 $362.54299 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-110 $362.54295 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-111 $362.54291 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-112 $362.54275 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-113 $362.54279 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-114 $362.54283 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-115 $362.54287 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-116 $362.54253 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-117 $362.54249 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-118 $362.54245 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-119 $362.54241 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-120 $362.54231 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-121 $362.54227 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-122 $362.54223 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-123 $362.54219 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-124 $362.54157 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM - 18 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSA T-1\FY19-20\FOXPRO\troll_csa t-1.frx - ct_11920t.dbf 05/06/19 CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 TENTATIVE SERVICE CHARGE ROLL Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-700-125 $362.54153 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-126 $362.54149 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-700-127 $362.54145 CHANNI LOOPTWNHM 206-710-001 $453.183001 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-710-002 $453.183007 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-710-003 $453.183011 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-710-004 $453.183017 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-710-005 $453.183023 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-710-006 $453.183029 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-710-007 $453.183035 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-710-008 $453.183293 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-710-009 $453.183301 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-710-010 $453.183309 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-710-011 $453.183317 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-710-012 $453.183325 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-710-013 $453.183333 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-710-014 $453.18801 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-015 $453.18807 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-016 $453.18815 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-017 $453.18821 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-018 $453.18833 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-019 $453.18839 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-020 $453.18845 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-021 $453.18851 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-022 $453.18857 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-023 $453.18848 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-024 $453.18842 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-025 $453.18836 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-026 $453.18830 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-027 $453.18824 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-028 $453.18816 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-029 $453.18800 GRIFFON CTSFR 206-710-030 $453.18701 MASTINO CTSFR 206-710-031 $453.18709 MASTINO CTSFR 206-710-032 $453.18717 MASTINO CTSFR 206-710-033 $453.18725 MASTINO CTSFR 206-710-034 $453.18733 MASTINO CTSFR 206-710-035 $453.18741 MASTINO CTSFR 206-710-036 $453.182224 LUSITANO STSFR 206-710-037 $453.182216 LUSITANO STSFR 206-710-038 $453.182208 LUSITANO STSFR 206-710-039 $453.182200 LUSITANO STSFR 206-710-040 $453.183318 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-710-041 $453.183312 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-710-042 $453.183306 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-710-043 $453.183300 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-710-044 $453.183294 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-710-045 $453.183848 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-710-046 $453.183836 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-710-047 $453.183824 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-710-048 $453.183812 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-710-049 $453.183800 WELSHLAND STSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-710-050 $453.183803 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-710-051 $453.183815 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-710-052 $453.183827 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-710-053 $453.183839 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-710-054 $453.183851 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-710-055 $453.183030 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-710-056 $453.183024 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-710-057 $453.183018 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-710-058 $453.183012 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-710-059 $453.183006 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-710-060 $453.183000 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-001 $453.183039 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-002 $453.183045 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-003 $453.183051 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-004 $453.183057 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-005 $453.183063 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-006 $453.183069 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-007 $453.183075 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-008 $453.183081 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-009 $453.183087 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-010 $453.183093 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-011 $453.183099 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-012 $453.183101 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-013 $453.183109 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-014 $453.183117 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-015 $453.183125 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-016 $453.183133 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-017 $453.183137 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-018 $453.183149 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-019 $453.183157 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-020 $453.183165 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-021 $453.183173 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-022 $453.183181 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-023 $453.183189 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-024 $453.183197 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-025 $453.183205 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-026 $453.183213 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-027 $453.183221 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-028 $453.183229 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-029 $453.183237 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-030 $453.183245 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-031 $453.183253 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-032 $453.183261 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-033 $453.183269 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-034 $453.183277 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-035 $453.183285 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-036 $453.183288 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-037 $453.183280 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-038 $453.183272 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-039 $453.183264 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-040 $453.183256 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-041 $453.183248 GRIFFON ST WSFR - 19 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSA T-1\FY19-20\FOXPRO\troll_csa t-1.frx - ct_11920t.dbf 05/06/19 CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 TENTATIVE SERVICE CHARGE ROLL Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-720-042 $453.183240 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-043 $453.18901 ARMANT CTSFR 206-720-044 $453.18909 ARMANT CTSFR 206-720-045 $453.18917 ARMANT CTSFR 206-720-046 $453.18925 ARMANT CTSFR 206-720-047 $453.183198 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-048 $453.183172 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-049 $453.183148 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-050 $453.183136 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-051 $453.183124 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-052 $453.183112 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-053 $453.183100 GRIFFON ST WSFR 206-720-054 $453.183968 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-055 $453.183956 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-056 $453.183944 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-057 $453.183932 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-058 $453.183920 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-059 $453.183908 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-060 $453.183896 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-061 $453.183884 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-062 $453.183872 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-063 $453.183860 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-064 $453.183863 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-065 $453.183875 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-066 $453.183887 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-067 $453.183899 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-068 $453.183911 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-069 $453.183923 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-070 $453.183935 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-071 $453.183947 WELSHLAND STSFR 206-720-072 $453.183072 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-073 $453.183066 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-074 $453.183060 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-075 $453.183054 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-076 $453.183048 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-077 $453.183042 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-720-078 $453.183036 GRIFFON ST ESFR 206-730-001 $453.18305 MASHONA CTSFR 206-730-002 $453.18311 MASHONA CTSFR 206-730-003 $453.18317 MASHONA CTSFR 206-730-004 $453.18321 MASHONA CTSFR 206-730-005 $453.18331 MASHONA CTSFR 206-730-006 $453.18326 MASHONA CTSFR 206-730-007 $453.18318 MASHONA CTSFR 206-730-008 $453.18310 MASHONA CTSFR 206-730-009 $453.18302 MASHONA CTSFR 206-730-010 $453.185035 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-011 $453.185041 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-012 $453.185047 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-013 $453.185053 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-014 $453.185059 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-015 $453.185065 ENDERBY STSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-730-016 $453.185071 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-017 $453.185077 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-018 $453.185083 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-019 $453.185089 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-020 $453.18421 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-021 $453.18427 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-022 $453.18433 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-023 $453.18439 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-024 $453.18445 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-025 $453.18451 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-026 $453.18457 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-030 $453.18460 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-031 $453.18454 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-032 $453.18448 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-033 $453.18442 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-034 $453.18436 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-035 $453.185086 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-036 $453.185080 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-037 $453.185074 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-038 $453.185068 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-039 $453.185062 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-040 $453.185056 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-041 $453.185050 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-042 $453.185044 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-043 $453.185038 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-044 $453.185032 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-045 $453.185026 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-046 $453.185020 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-047 $453.185014 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-048 $453.185008 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-049 $453.185002 ENDERBY STSFR 206-730-050 $453.18463 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-051 $453.18472 BENGALI CTSFR 206-730-052 $453.18466 BENGALI CTSFR 206-740-001 $453.18430 BENGALI CTSFR 206-740-002 $453.18418 BENGALI CTSFR 206-740-003 $453.18412 BENGALI CTSFR 206-740-004 $453.18406 BENGALI CTSFR 206-740-005 $453.18400 BENGALI CTSFR 206-740-006 $453.185398 BENGALI STSFR 206-740-007 $453.185392 BENGALI STSFR 206-740-008 $453.185386 BENGALI STSFR 206-740-009 $453.185380 BENGALI STSFR 206-740-010 $453.185374 BENGALI STSFR 206-740-011 $453.185268 BENGALI STSFR 206-740-012 $453.185262 BENGALI STSFR 206-740-013 $453.185256 BENGALI STSFR 206-740-014 $453.185250 BENGALI STSFR 206-740-015 $453.185244 BENGALI STSFR 206-740-016 $453.185238 BENGALI STSFR 206-740-017 $453.185493 BELARUS STSFR 206-740-018 $453.185499 BELARUS STSFR - 20 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSA T-1\FY19-20\FOXPRO\troll_csa t-1.frx - ct_11920t.dbf 05/06/19 CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 TENTATIVE SERVICE CHARGE ROLL Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-740-019 $453.185505 BELARUS STSFR 206-740-020 $453.185511 BELARUS STSFR 206-740-021 $453.185517 BELARUS STSFR 206-740-022 $453.185523 BELARUS STSFR 206-740-023 $453.185529 BELARUS STSFR 206-740-024 $453.185535 BELARUS STSFR 206-740-025 $453.18205 VESTLAND CTSFR 206-740-026 $453.18211 VESTLAND CTSFR 206-740-027 $453.18217 VESTLAND CTSFR 206-740-028 $453.18220 VESTLAND CTSFR 206-740-029 $453.185373 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-001 $453.185224 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-002 $453.185218 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-003 $453.185212 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-004 $453.185206 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-005 $453.185200 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-006 $453.185194 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-007 $453.185188 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-008 $453.185182 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-009 $453.185176 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-010 $453.185170 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-011 $453.185164 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-012 $453.185158 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-013 $453.185152 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-014 $453.185146 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-015 $453.185140 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-016 $453.185134 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-017 $453.185128 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-018 $453.185122 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-019 $453.185116 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-020 $453.18101 BALTANA CTSFR 206-750-021 $453.18109 BALTANA CTSFR 206-750-022 $453.18117 BALTANA CTSFR 206-750-023 $453.18116 BALTANA CTSFR 206-750-024 $453.18108 BALTANA CTSFR 206-750-025 $453.18100 BALTANA CTSFR 206-750-026 $453.185101 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-027 $453.185107 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-028 $453.185113 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-029 $453.185119 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-030 $453.185402 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-031 $453.185139 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-032 $453.185147 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-033 $453.185155 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-034 $453.185163 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-035 $453.185171 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-036 $453.185179 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-037 $453.185187 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-038 $453.185195 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-039 $453.185203 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-040 $453.185211 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-041 $453.185219 BENGALI STSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-750-042 $453.185227 BENGALI STSFR 206-750-043 $453.185654 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-044 $453.185648 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-045 $453.185642 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-046 $453.185636 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-047 $453.185630 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-048 $453.185624 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-049 $453.185618 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-050 $453.185612 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-051 $453.185434 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-052 $453.185426 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-053 $453.185418 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-054 $453.185410 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-055 $453.185409 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-056 $453.185415 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-057 $453.185421 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-058 $453.185427 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-059 $453.185433 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-060 $453.185439 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-061 $453.185445 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-062 $453.185451 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-063 $453.185446 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-064 $453.185611 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-065 $453.185617 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-066 $453.185623 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-067 $453.185629 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-068 $453.185635 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-069 $453.185639 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-070 $453.185647 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-071 $453.185653 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-072 $453.185659 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-073 $453.185665 EVOLENE STSFR 206-750-074 $453.185534 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-075 $453.185526 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-076 $453.185518 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-077 $453.185510 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-078 $453.185502 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-079 $453.185494 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-080 $453.185486 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-081 $453.185478 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-082 $453.185470 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-083 $453.185462 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-084 $453.185454 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-085 $453.185457 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-086 $453.185463 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-087 $453.185469 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-088 $453.185475 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-089 $453.185481 BELARUS STSFR 206-750-090 $453.185489 BELARUS STSFR 206-760-001 $453.181226 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-002 $453.181234 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-003 $453.181242 CHARBRAY STSFR - 21 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSA T-1\FY19-20\FOXPRO\troll_csa t-1.frx - ct_11920t.dbf 05/06/19 CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 TENTATIVE SERVICE CHARGE ROLL Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-760-004 $453.181250 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-005 $453.181258 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-006 $453.18CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-007 $453.181274 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-008 $453.181282 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-009 $453.181290 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-010 $453.18CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-011 $453.181239 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-012 $453.181245 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-013 $453.181251 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-014 $453.181257 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-015 $453.181263 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-016 $453.181269 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-017 $453.181275 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-018 $453.18CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-019 $453.181287 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-020 $453.181293 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-760-021 $453.181299 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-001 $453.181306 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-002 $453.181314 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-003 $453.181322 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-004 $453.181330 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-005 $453.181338 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-006 $453.181346 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-007 $453.18CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-008 $453.181362 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-009 $453.181370 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-010 $453.18900 CONNEMARA CTSFR 206-770-011 $453.18908 CONNEMARA CTSFR 206-770-012 $453.18916 CONNEMARA CTSFR 206-770-013 $453.18924 CONNEMARA CTSFR 206-770-014 $453.18CONNEMARA CTSFR 206-770-015 $453.18940 CONNEMARA CTSFR 206-770-016 $453.181307 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-017 $453.181315 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-018 $453.181323 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-019 $453.181331 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-020 $453.181339 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-021 $453.181347 CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-022 $453.18CHARBRAY STSFR 206-770-023 $453.18909 CONNEMARA CTSFR 206-770-024 $453.18919 CONNEMARA CTSFR 206-770-025 $453.18927 CONNEMARA CTSFR 206-770-026 $453.18935 CONNEMARA CTSFR 206-770-027 $453.18943 CONNEMARA CTSFR 206-780-001 $453.186021 MASSARA STSFR 206-780-016 $453.18MASSARA CTSFR 206-790-001 $453.18MASSARA CTSFR 206-790-002 $453.18MASSARA CTSFR 206-790-003 $453.18MASSARA CTSFR 206-790-005 $453.18MASSARA CTSFR 206-790-007 $453.18MASSARA CTSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-790-012 $453.18TURANIAN CTSFR 206-790-013 $453.18TURANIAN CTSFR 206-790-014 $453.18TURANIAN CTSFR 206-790-025 $453.18225 ROBERT DUCHI WAYSFR 206-790-026 $453.18ROBERT DUCHI WAYSFR 206-800-001 $453.18GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-002 $453.18GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-003 $453.183008 GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-004 $453.183012 GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-005 $453.183016 GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-006 $453.183020 GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-007 $453.183024 GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-008 $453.183028 GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-009 $453.183032 GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-010 $453.183036 GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-011 $453.183044 GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-012 $453.183048 GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-013 $453.183052 GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-014 $453.1811 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-015 $453.1815 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-016 $453.1819 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-017 $453.1823 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-018 $453.1827 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-019 $453.1831 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-020 $453.1835 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-021 $453.1839 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-022 $453.1843 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-023 $453.1851 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-024 $453.1846 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-025 $453.1842 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-026 $453.1838 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-027 $453.1834 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-028 $453.1830 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-029 $453.1826 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-030 $453.1818 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-031 $453.1814 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-032 $453.1810 BALTANA PLSFR 206-800-033 $453.18201 FONTHILL CTSFR 206-800-034 $453.18207 FONTHILL CTSFR 206-800-035 $453.18213 FONTHILL CTSFR 206-800-036 $453.18219 FONTHILL CTSFR 206-800-037 $453.18218 FONTHILL CTSFR 206-800-038 $453.18212 FONTHILL CTSFR 206-800-039 $453.18206 FONTHILL CTSFR 206-800-040 $453.18200 FONTHILL CTSFR 206-800-041 $453.183027 GRITSTONE STSFR 206-800-042 $453.18107 CAPARI CTSFR 206-800-043 $453.18112 CAPARI CTSFR 206-800-044 $453.18106 CAPARI CTSFR 206-800-045 $453.18100 CAPARI CTSFR 206-800-046 $453.18CAPARI CTSFR 206-800-047 $453.18CAPARI CTSFR - 22 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSA T-1\FY19-20\FOXPRO\troll_csa t-1.frx - ct_11920t.dbf 05/06/19 CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 TENTATIVE SERVICE CHARGE ROLL Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-800-048 $453.18ENDERBY STSFR 206-800-049 $453.18ENDERBY STSFR 206-800-051 $453.18406 VENDEEN CTSFR 206-800-052 $453.18412 VENDEEN CTSFR 206-800-053 $453.18418 VENDEEN CTSFR 206-800-054 $453.18VENDEEN CTSFR 206-800-055 $453.18VENDEEN CTSFR 206-800-056 $453.18VENDEEN CTSFR 206-800-057 $453.18415 VENDEEN CTSFR 206-800-058 $453.18405 VENDEEN CTSFR 206-800-059 $453.18304 OBERLAND CTSFR 206-800-060 $453.18310 OBERLAND CTSFR 206-800-061 $453.18316 OBERLAND CTSFR 206-800-062 $453.18OBERLAND CTSFR 206-800-063 $453.18325 OBERLAND CTSFR 206-800-064 $453.18OBERLAND CTSFR 206-800-065 $453.18313 OBERLAND CTSFR 206-800-066 $453.18307 OBERLAND CTSFR 206-800-067 $453.18301 OBERLAND CTSFR 206-810-001 $453.182068 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-002 $453.182064 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-003 $453.182066 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-004 $453.182056 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-005 $453.182052 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-006 $453.182048 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-007 $453.182044 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-008 $453.182040 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-009 $453.182036 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-010 $453.182032 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-011 $453.182026 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-012 $453.182016 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-013 $453.182010 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-014 $453.182004 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-015 $453.182000 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-016 $453.182001 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-017 $453.182005 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-018 $453.182009 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-019 $453.182013 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-020 $453.182017 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-021 $453.182021 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-022 $453.182025 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-023 $453.182029 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-024 $453.182033 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-025 $453.182037 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-026 $453.182041 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-027 $453.182045 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-028 $453.182049 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-029 $453.182053 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-030 $453.182057 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-810-031 $453.182061 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-001 $453.182071 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-002 $453.182079 DRYSDALE STSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-820-003 $453.182087 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-004 $453.182091 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-005 $453.182095 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-006 $453.183001 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-007 $453.183005 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-008 $453.183009 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-009 $453.18506 DAMARA CTSFR 206-820-010 $453.18DAMARA CTSFR 206-820-011 $453.18513 DAMARA CTSFR 206-820-012 $453.18507 DAMARA CTSFR 206-820-013 $453.183013 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-014 $453.183017 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-015 $453.183020 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-016 $453.183016 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-017 $453.183012 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-018 $453.183008 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-019 $453.183004 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-020 $453.183000 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-021 $453.18200 CORRIEDALE CTSFR 206-820-022 $453.18206 CORRIEDALE CTSFR 206-820-023 $453.18212 CORRIEDALE CTSFR 206-820-024 $453.18218 CORRIEDALE CTSFR 206-820-025 $453.18224 CORRIEDALE CTSFR 206-820-026 $453.18213 CORRIEDALE CTSFR 206-820-027 $453.18207 CORRIEDALE CTSFR 206-820-028 $453.18201 CORRIEDALE CTSFR 206-820-029 $453.185014 KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-030 $453.185018 KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-031 $453.185022 KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-032 $453.18KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-033 $453.18KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-034 $453.18KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-035 $453.185038 KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-036 $453.185042 KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-037 $453.18KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-038 $453.18GRITSTONE STSFR 206-820-039 $453.18GRITSTONE STSFR 206-820-040 $453.18GRITSTONE STSFR 206-820-041 $453.18GRITSTONE STSFR 206-820-042 $453.18GRITSTONE STSFR 206-820-043 $453.18GRITSTONE STSFR 206-820-044 $453.18KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-045 $453.18KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-046 $453.18KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-047 $453.185033 KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-048 $453.18KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-049 $453.185025 KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-050 $453.185021 KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-051 $453.185017 KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-052 $453.185013 KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-053 $453.18KERRY HILL STSFR 206-820-054 $453.185005 KERRY HILL STSFR - 23 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSA T-1\FY19-20\FOXPRO\troll_csa t-1.frx - ct_11920t.dbf 05/06/19 CSA T-1 Public Transit Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 TENTATIVE SERVICE CHARGE ROLL Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service ChargeClassification Property Address 206-820-055 $453.182096 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-056 $453.182092 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-057 $453.182088 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-058 $453.182084 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-059 $453.182080 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-060 $453.182076 DRYSDALE STSFR 206-820-061 $453.182072 DRYSDALE STSFR @1,151Total Parcels: $579,989.88 Total Assessment: - 24 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSA T-1\FY19-20\FOXPRO\troll_csa t-1.frx - ct_11920t.dbf 05/06/19 RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. OPEN the public hearing; RECEIVE and CONSIDER public comments and protests; CLOSE the public hearing. 2. ACCEPT the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Final Engineer’s Report for Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2), 3. ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/167 confirming the diagram, assessment roll, and assessments set forth in the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Final Engineer’s Report for Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2), and 4. DIRECT the Auditor-Controller to place the levy of annual assessments on the tax roll for Fiscal Year 2019-20. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) funds. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Carl Roner (925)313-2213 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, Brian Brown, Francisco & Associates, Inc., Diana Oyler - Finance , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Victoria Skerritt, Special Districts, Jessi Duffy- Special Districts D. 8 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:HEARING to levy assessments in Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) Fiscal year 2019-20 BACKGROUND: The existing Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) contains thirty (30) Benefit Zones comprised of landscaping, pedestrian bridges, irrigation, park, and recreational facilities, and ancillary improvements installed by developers as a condition of their development. The annual assessment levies within these Benefit Zones will fund the operation, maintenance, and capital replacement of the facilities within each respective Benefit Zone. On March 26, 2019, the Board of Supervisors adopted the Resolution of Initiation (Resolution No. 2019/84) which directed the Engineer of Work to prepare the FY 2019-20 Preliminary Engineer’s Report for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2). The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that an Engineer’s Report be prepared each fiscal year to identify any changes in the improvements and assessments, and to set the ensuing year’s special assessment rates. On May 7, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved the Preliminary Engineer’s Report and adopted the Resolution of Intention (Resolution No. 2019/142) which; a) Declared the Board's intention to levy and collect assessments within Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979 (LL-2) for FY 2019-20; b) Generally described the improvements within Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) for FY 2019/20; c) Referred to the assessment district by its distinctive name and indicated the general location of the district; d) Referred to the Engineer's Report, on file with the Clerk of the Board, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the assessment district, and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the district; e) Gave notice of the time, date, and the place for hearing regarding the levy of the proposed assessments; and f) Stated the zones where the proposed assessments are to be increased from the previous year. Attached to this board order is a Final Engineer’s Report, including Descriptions and the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Budgets (Exhibit A), the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Diagrams (Exhibit B), and the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessment Roll (Exhibit C), which represents any changes that may have been directed by the Board of Supervisors at the Board Meeting on May 7, 2019, where the LL-2 Preliminary Engineers report was accepted. The Fiscal Year 2019-20 assessments are based on information in the Final Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2019-20. Assessments are calculated by considering all anticipated expenditures for maintenance, utilities, and administration. Any excess dollars from previous fiscal years are carried forward and the assessment amounts are adjusted accordingly. The assessment rates may change from fiscal year to fiscal year, dependent upon improvements to be constructed and maintenance to be performed; however the assessments cannot exceed the maximum amount set when the Benefit Zone was originally formed, plus an annual cost of living adjustment, if applicable. The proposed assessments being levied for each Benefit Zone for the Fiscal Year 2019-20 are either at, or below, the maximum assessment rates. The assessment amounts proposed, in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, have been presented in the Preliminary and Final Engineer's Reports filed with the Board on May 7, 2019, and June 11, 2019, respectively. The June 11, 2019 public hearing for the Final Engineer’s Report has been publicly noticed. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without Board of Supervisors’ approval there would be no acceptance of the Final Engineer’s report and Without Board of Supervisors’ approval there would be no acceptance of the Final Engineer’s report and the assessment of levies for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) for Fiscal Year 2019-20 would not be authorized on the tax roll, thus funds would not be available to maintain the landscaping and other improvements in the Benefit Zones throughout the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2). CLERK'S ADDENDUM Opened the public hearing; received and considered public comments and protests; closed the public hearing. Accepted the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Final Engineer’s Report for Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2). Adopted Resolution No. 2019/167 confirming the diagram, assessment roll, and assessments set forth in the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Final Engineer’s Report for Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2), and Directed the Auditor-Controller to place the levy of annual assessments on the tax roll for Fiscal Year 2019-20. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2019/167 Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2019/167 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/167 IN THE MATTER OF a Hearing to levy assessments in Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) Fiscal Year 2019-20, (Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) Funds) (All Districts) (Project Number 4500-6X5105). WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County FINDS THAT: 1. A Resolution of Initiation (No. 2019/84) was approved on March 26, 2019, pursuant to Chapter 3 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, in which the Board of Supervisors designated the Public Works Director, or designee, as the Engineer of Work for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) for Fiscal Year 2019-20, described any new improvements or any substantial changes in existing improvements, and ordered the Engineer of Work to prepare and file an Engineer’s Report with the Clerk of the Board; and 2. Per Section 22623 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the Engineer of Work has filed with the Clerk of the Board, an Engineer’s Report for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2), including Benefit Zones 1, 2 ,3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 11, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 27, 35, 36, 37, 38, 42, 45, 48, 54, 57, 61, 63, 64, 68, 69, 70, 71, 74, and 75 for Fiscal Year 2019-20, which was subsequently approved by the Board of Supervisors; and 3. A Resolution of Intention (No. 2019/142) was approved by the Board of Supervisors on May 7, 2019, which among other things set the date of June 11, 2019, for a Public Hearing at 9:30 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California; and 4. A Public Hearing was conducted on June 11, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. in the Chambers of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, and any interested person was given an opportunity to protest the assessments and the Final Engineer’s Report for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2), either in writing or orally, and it was determined that a majority protest had not been filed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: 1. Orders the improvements for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) for Fiscal Year 2019-20; and 2. Confirms the diagram and assessments as shown in the Final Engineer’s Report for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2) for Fiscal Year 2019-20; and 3. Authorizes the levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2019-20 for the Countywide Landscaping District AD 1979-3 (LL-2). Contact: Carl Roner (925)313-2213 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, Brian Brown, Francisco & Associates, Inc., Diana Oyler - Finance , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Victoria Skerritt, Special Districts, Jessi Duffy- Special Districts CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR THE COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING district (ll-2) Prepared by: Francisco & Associates, Inc. 231 Market Place, Suite 543 San Ramon, CA 94583 (925) 867-3400 Fiscal Year 2019-20 Final Engineer’s Report June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 TABLE OF CONTENTS ccc1920_FER - i - Francisco & Associates, Inc. Page No. Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and County Staff .................................................. ii Certificates ............................................................................................................................................. iii SECTION I – Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Table 1 – Benefit Zones modified since FY 2018-19 ............................................. 2 SECTION II – Engineer’s Report ....................................................................................................... 3 PART A – Plans and Specifications...................................................................................... 5 PART B – Estimate of Cost .................................................................................................. 14 Table 2 –FY 2019-20 Summary ........................................................................ 15 PART C – Assessment District Diagram .......................................................................... 17 PART D – Method of Apportionment of Assessment ................................................... 19 Special vs. General Benefit ............................................................................. 20 PART E – Property List and Assessment Roll ................................................................ 37 APPENDICES APPENDIX A – Detailed Project Cost Breakdown APPENDIX B – Assessment Diagrams APPENDIX C – Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessment Roll Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 BOARD AND COUNTY STAFF ccc1920_FER - ii - Francisco & Associates, Inc. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT (LL-2) (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 1979-3) FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY STAFF John M. Gioia Chair District I Supervisor Candace Andersen Karen Mitchoff Vice Chair District IV Supervisor District II Supervisor Diane Burgis Federal D. Glover District III Supervisor District V Supervisor COUNTY STAFF Brian M. Balbas Public Works Director Sharon L. Anderson David Twa County Counsel Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Carl J. Roner Senior Civil Engineer Francisco & Associates Assessment Engineer Contra Costa County SECTION I Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 INTRODUCTION ccc1920_FER - 1 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. SECTION I INTRODUCTION ENGINEER'S REPORT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT (LL-2) FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 To ensure the proper flow of funds for the ongoing operation, maintenance, and servicing of specific improvements within the boundaries of Contra Costa County, the Board of Supervisors, through the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, approved the formation of Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) (the “District”). Improvements that may be constructed, operated, maintained, and serviced by the District include: Landscaping, irrigation, lighting (not street lighting, except in special cases), park and recreational facilities, including but not limited to lights, playground equipment, play courts, public restrooms, and associated appurtenant facilities. Generally, developers, as a part of their conditions permitting the developer to construct new housing or commercial/industrial developments, construct these aforementioned public improvements. However, the ongoing operation and maintenance of these various improvements are financed through the District. The District is composed of “Benefit Zones” to ensure that the operation and maintenance of the improvements are specifically paid for by those property owners who directly benefit from the improvements. As required by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, the annual Engineer's Report must be reviewed by the Board of Supervisors each year and includes: (1) a description by Benefit Zone of the improvements to be operated, maintained, and serviced by the District, (2) an estimated budget by Benefit Zone for the District, and (3) a listing of the proposed assessments to be levied upon each assessable lot or parcel within the District. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors will hold a Public Hearing, June 11, 2019, regarding the District and proposed Fiscal Year 2019-20 annual assessments to be levied, to provide an opportunity for any interested person to be heard. At the conclusion of the Public Hearing, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors may adopt a resolution confirming the levy of assessments as originally proposed or modified. Following the adoption of this resolution, the final Assessor’s roll will be prepared and filed with the County Auditor’s office to be included on the Fiscal Year 2019-20 tax roll. Payment of the assessment for each parcel will be made in the same manner and at the same time as payments are made for property taxes. All funds collected through the assessment must be placed in a special fund and can only be used for the purposes stated within this report. Contra Costa County SECTION I Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 INTRODUCTION ccc1920_FER - 2 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. In addition to the existing Benefit Zones, new Benefit Zones are created throughout the fiscal year as development is processed. Table 1 below indicates those Benefit Zones that have been annexed into the District or modified since the prior year’s annual report was prepared in Fiscal Year 2018- 19. Table 1 – Benefit Zones modified since FY2018-19 Benefit Zone Comment Not Applicable No new zones of benefit have been created, nor have any parcels been annexed into an existing benefit zone during Fiscal Year 2018-19. Benefit Zones with Proposed Assessment Increases for FY 2019-20 Benefit Zones No. 5, 35, 54, 69, 70, 71, 74, and 75 had their maximum assessment rate increased 3.53% over the FY 2018-19 rate. These benefit zones can be increased each fiscal year by the annual change in the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco Bay Area – All Urban Consumers (CPI). For Fiscal Year 2019-20 the CPI increased from 281.308 to 291.227, which equals an increase of 3.53%. In addition, Benefit Zone No. 61 was increased from $150/EDU to $160/EDU with a maximum assessment rate of $190/EDU and Benefit Zone No. 70 was increased from $140/EDU to $200/EDU with a maximum assessment rate of $455.97/EDU. These assessment increases were necessary to cover expected operation and maintenance costs for FY 2019-20. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 ENGINEER'S REPORT ccc1920_FER - 3 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. SECTION II ENGINEER'S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTIONS 22500 THROUGH 22679 OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT (LL-2) FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 Pursuant to Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with the Resolution of Intention, being Resolution No. 2019/142, adopted May 7, 2019, and the Resolution of Initiation, being Resolution No. 2019/84 adopted March 26, 2019, by the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT (LL-2) HEREIN AFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “ASSESSMENT DISTRICT” I, Carl J. Roner, P.E., the duly appointed ENGINEER OF WORK, submits herewith the "Report" consisting of five (5) parts as follows: PART A - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS This part describes the improvements to be maintained within the District. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file in the Public Works Department. PART B - ESTIMATE OF COST This part contains an estimate of the cost of the administration, maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements in each Benefit Zone as described in Part A (Plans and Specifications). This part includes the projected expenses for Fiscal Year 2018-19 in addition to the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2019-20 for each of the Benefit Zones. The detailed budget information is on file in the Public Works Department. PART C - ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM This part incorporates by reference a diagram of the District showing the exterior boundaries of the District, the boundaries of any Benefit Zones within the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District. The diagram has been prepared by County staff and submitted to the Contra Costa County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year when this Report was prepared. The Assessor's maps and records are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 ENGINEER'S REPORT ccc1920_FER - 4 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PART D - METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT This part contains the method of apportionment of assessments, based upon parcel classification of land within the District, in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received. PART E - PROPERTY LIST AND ASSESSMENT ROLL This part contains a list of the parcels and proposed assessment amount on each benefited lot or parcel of land within the District. The list is keyed to the records of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which is incorporated herein by reference and is filed in the Office of the Contra Costa County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART A ccc1920_FER - 5 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PART A PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS The facilities, which have been constructed within each of the Benefit Zones within the District, and those which may be subsequently constructed, will be operated, maintained and serviced as generally described as follows: DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT (LL-2) FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 The improvements consist of the construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, irrigation, lighting (not street lighting except in special cases), park and recreational facilities, and appurtenant facilities including but not limited to: personnel, electrical energy, utilities such as water, materials, contractual services, and other items necessary for the satisfactory operation of these services and facilities as described below: Landscaping The landscaping facilities consist of, but are not limited to: landscaping, planting, shrubbery, trees, irrigation systems, hardscapes, sidewalks, trails, lighting, and appurtenant facilities including, but not limited to playground equipment, play courts, and public restrooms, located within the public rights-of-way, parkways, parks, County building grounds, and designated easements within the boundaries of the District. Park and Recreation Facilities The operation and maintenance of park and recreational facilities includes, but is not limited to: lights, playground equipment, play courts, community center buildings, and public restrooms and associated appurtenant facilities located within the boundaries of the District. On the following pages is a detailed description of the improvements that are being operated, maintained, and serviced throughout each Benefit Zone within the District. In addition, Appendix B (Assessment Diagrams), provides a detailed diagram of each Benefit Zone’s improvements. The number indicating the improvements listed in each Benefit Zone on the following pages corresponds to the numbers on each Assessment Diagram in Appendix B. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART A ccc1920_FER - 6 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zones 1, 2, and 4 (Lynbrook Development - Bay Point Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities, and related improvements located along the following roadways and within the following parks: 1. Port Chicago Highway (approximately 1,600 linear feet); 2. Kevin Drive (approximately 3,600 linear feet on the north side and approximately 2,600 linear feet on the south side); 3. Lynbrook Street (approximately 1,050 linear feet on the north side and approximately 850 linear feet on the south side); 4. Willow Pass Road (approximately 900 linear feet); and 5. Lynbrook Park* (4.13 acres within the Lynbrook development) includes all playground equipment, ambient lighting and related improvements. Location: Kevin Drive and Port Chicago Highway. *Please note: Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for the maintenance of Lynbrook Park per the June 26, 2012 Joint Power of Agreement (JEPA) between the County and Ambrose.  Zone 3 (Hickory Meadows - Bay Point Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities, and related improvements located along the following roadways and within the following parks: 1. Hickory Meadows Park* (0.37 acres) located at the intersection of Winterbrook Drive and Summerfield Drive. *Please note: Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for the maintenance of Hickory Meadows Park per the June 26, 2012 Joint Power of Agreement (JEPA) between the County and Ambrose.  Zone 5 (Pacheco Beautification Project - Pacheco Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities, and related improvements located along the following roadways and within the following parks: 1. Pacheco Boulevard median island improvements that were installed as part of the Beautification Project (between Center Avenue and Second Street); and 2. Pacheco Creekside Park trail (1.61 acres).  Zone 7 (Pleasant Hill/BART - Contra Costa Centre Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located within: 1. Various median islands within Las Juntas Way, Coggins Road, Jones Road, Wayne Drive, Treat Boulevard, and Oak Road; and 2. Fox Creek Park (0.50 acres). Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART A ccc1920_FER - 7 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 10 (Viewpointe - Bay Point Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located within: 1. Open Space - Slope easement areas (up to 10 feet); 2. Paved walking trails (located on Pomo Street and the slope behind Skyharbour Lane); 3. Viewpointe Park* (a.k.a. Lehman Park – 0.08 acres). Location: Pomo Street and Seacliff Place; 4. Landscaping at the end of Skyharbour Lane and Waterview Place cul-de-sacs; and 5. Frontage landscaping on the north side of Evora Road. *Please note: Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for the maintenance of Viewpointe Park per the June 26, 2012 Joint Power of Agreement (JEPA) between the County and Ambrose.  Zone 11 (Hilltop Commons - San Pablo Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located within: 1. Approximately 2,040 square feet of landscaping along the southeast side frontage along San Pablo Avenue between Kay Road and Crestwood Drive located between the sidewalk and the fence; and 2. Median along San Pablo Avenue between Kay Road and Crestwood Drive.  Zone 17 (Shadow Creek - Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located along: 1. Camino Tassajara on the north side, adjacent to the sidewalk areas, and the entry post areas located at Shadow Creek Drive and Knollview Drive.  Zone 18 (Pacheco Manor - Pacheco Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located along: 1. The frontage next to Pacheco Manor soundwall along Pacheco Boulevard; and 2. The frontage next to Pacheco Manor fence along the east side of Temple Drive.  Zone 19 (Hidden Pond - Reliez Valley/Martinez Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located along the following roadways: 1. The frontage of Reliez Valley Road, (approximately 1,500 linear feet); and 2. The frontage of Hidden Pond Road, (approximately 1,000 linear feet).  Zone 21 (Kensington - Kensington Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located within: 1. The six (6) roadway medians along Arlington Avenue; 2. The Colusa Traffic Circle; 3. The Kensington sign area; and 4. The frontage landscape on both sides of Arlington Avenue between Ardmore Road and Coventry Road. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART A ccc1920_FER - 8 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 22 (Seabreeze - Bay Point Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located along the following roadways and within the open space include: 1. Landscaping frontage on the north side of Evora Road and median along Saint Tropez; 2. Open Space along the perimeter of Seabreeze subdivision and Subdivision 8330; 3. Open space on perimeter of Parcel A located at the corner of Evora Road and Mota Drive; 4. Landscaping at the ends of Beaulieu Court and Beaulieu Place; 5. Landscaping at Rapallo Lane at Savona Way entry area; and 6. Landscaping along south side of Savona Way.  Zone 27 (Bettencourt Ranch and Somerset - Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located along the Camino Tassajara frontage of Bettencourt Ranch and Somerset Subdivisions: 1. Planting strips along Camino Tassajara between the curb and sidewalk (the slopes north of Camino Tassajara Road in this area are the property of the Bettencourt HOA and the responsibility of the Bettencourt HOA); 2. Medians along Camino Tassajara between Buckingham Drive and Mansfield Drive. In Fiscal Year 2004-05, Zone 27A was created at a lower rate for those homeowners in Tract 7763 – due to the fact they are on a private street and have a reduced level of landscaping.  Zone 35 (Sandy Cove Shopping Center* - Discovery Bay Area) Landscaping, irrigation, pedestrian trail, and related improvements located within the public right of way and trail easements; 1. Three (3) Bixler Road median islands adjacent to Sandy Cove Shopping Center; and 2. A pedestrian trail between the Sandy Cove Shopping Center and Newport Drive including two (2) footbridges and necessary appurtenances. *Please note: Discovery Bay Community Services District is responsible for the maintenance of the landscapes described in this section, per an October 28, 2008 Landscape Maintenance Agreement with Contra Costa County.  Zone 36 (Alamo Beautification - Alamo Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities, and related improvements along/within Danville Boulevard, Livorna Road, Miranda Avenue, and Stone Valley Road. These improvements include: 1. Median islands at the intersection of Stone Valley Road and Green Valley Road; 2. Trees related to the “Danville Boulevard of Trees” project; 3. Stone Valley Road landscaping. Phase I – North side of Stone Valley Road from Stone Valley Way to Austin Lane. South side from Alamo Ranch Road, approximately 280 linear feet east and south side from High Eagle Road, approximately 760 linear feet West; Phase II – Full responsibility for areas between Austin Lane and St. Paul Drive, excluding the Phase I area described above; 4. Additional litter pickup and sidewalk and jogging path cleanup along Danville Boulevard, Livorna Road, Miranda Avenue and Stone Valley Road. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART A ccc1920_FER - 9 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 37 (Clyde - Clyde Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities, and related improvements within: 1. Clyde Park (2.0 acres, located on Norman Avenue); 2. Marie Porter Park (0.22 acres, located on Kilburn Street and Norman Avenue); 3. Big Oak Tree Park (0.25 acres, located on Kilburn Street at the intersection of Wellington Avenue); and 4. Maybeck Park (0.07 acres, located on Medburn Street and Amy Lane).  Zone 38 (Rodeo - Rodeo Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities, and related improvements, including trails and picnic facilities. These improvements include: 1. The approximately 11-acre Lefty Gomez Ballfield Complex (located at 470 Parker Avenue); 2. Maintenance of the “Rodeo” signboard area at the corner of San Pablo Avenue and Willow Avenue (up to the Hercules city limit); 3. Parker Avenue trees along the west and east side frontage from First Street south to Sixth Street; 4. The 3-mile long Rodeo Creek Trail Corridor (from Investment Street south to the footbridge at Mariners Point and Seacliff Court); and 5. Pedestrian footbridge located at Highway 80 and Willow Avenue.  Zone 42 (California Skyline - Bay Point Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities, and related improvements located within the public right-of-way along: 1. The frontage along the north side of Evora Road; 2. Boeger Park* (0.57 acres, located on Caskey Street); 3. The public paths located between lots 40/41, 28/46, 1/Evora Road and 27/Evora Road of Subdivision 7838; 4. Both sides of Driftwood Drive from Jill Avenue to Coastview Court and within the median islands; 5. Tradewinds Park* (0.72 acres, located at Tradewinds Court), including the landscape area on the northeast and southwest corner of Coastview and Tradewinds Courts. *Please Note: Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for the maintenance of Boeger and Tradewinds Parks per the June 26, 2012 Joint Power of Agreement (JEPA) between the County and Ambrose.  Zone 45 (Alamo Villas - Alamo Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located within the public right-of-way along: 1. The median island, approximately 120 linear feet along Danville Boulevard by Tract 7559. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART A ccc1920_FER - 10 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 48 (Oakgate Drive - Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements within the public right-of-way along: 1. Oakgate Drive; and 2. The north side frontage of Camino Tassajara from 600’ west of Oak Gate Drive to Hansen Lane (approximately 725 linear feet).  Zone 54 (Alamo Country - Alamo Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located within the public right-of-way along: 1. Livorna Road and Miranda Avenue, fronting Subdivisions 7601 and 7818, totaling approximately 4,320 linear feet. Landscaping varies in width from 23 feet to 170 feet; and 2. A financial contribution of approximately $871 (93 units * $9.36) for the Zone 36 medians.  Zone 57 (Pacific Waterways - Discovery Bay Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities, and related improvements within the public right-of-way, landscape and pedestrian pathway easements, parking parcels, and a park parcel: 1. Regatta Park (4.83 acres, AKA Tyler Memorial Park, located on Sailboat Drive); 2. Public right-of-way along Highway 4 and Bixler Road, fronting Subdivisions 7679, 7907, 7908, 7909 and 7881, totaling approximately 3,680 linear feet; 3. Porthole Drive medians and frontage on both sides of approximately 340 linear feet each (totaling 1,020 linear feet); 4. Entry area at Bixler Road and Regatta Drive; 5. Parking bays and associated landscape; and 6. A short pedestrian path connecting Yacht Drive to Bixler Road. *Please note: Discovery Bay Community Services District is responsible for the maintenance of the landscapes and Regatta Park as described in this section, per an October 28, 2008 Landscape Maintenance Agreement with Contra Costa County.  Zone 61 (Discovery Bay West - Discovery Bay Area) Landscaping, irrigation, recreational facilities, and related improvements along the following roadways and within the following parks: 1. The public right-of-way frontage and medians along Newport Drive from Bixler Road to Newport Lane; 2. The public right-of-way frontage and medians along all of Preston Drive; 3. Frontage along both sides of Point of Timber Road adjacent to the Discovery Bay West development; 4. Slifer Park (5.83 acres); 5. Landscaping associated with the Park-n-Ride Lot located at Bixler Road; and 6. Frontages along Bixler Road Village I, Bixler Road Village II, Bixler Road Village III and Bixler Road Village IV. *Please note: Discovery Bay Community Services District is responsible for the maintenance of the landscapes and Slifer Park as described in this section, per an October 28, 2008 Landscape Maintenance Agreement with Contra Costa County. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART A ccc1920_FER - 11 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 63 (Parkway Estates - North Richmond Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements within: 1. Parkway Estates Park (0.32 acres, located on Malcom Drive).  Zone 64 (California Reflections - Pinole Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements consisting of approximately 231 linear feet located within: 1. The public right-of-way fronting San Pablo Avenue; and 2. The public right-of-way fronting Eire Drive. The landscape improvements vary in width from 15 feet to 30 feet.  Zone 68 (Wendt Ranch* - Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located within the public right-of-way and medians along: 1. Camino Tassajara median islands and frontage along the subdivision; and 2. Creekview Drive entry area, including the median island. The Creekview Drive and other parkway strips are specifically excluded. *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior sections of this Zone which are owned and maintained by a homeowner’s association per conditions of approval and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these interior areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of the District.  Zone 69 (Alamo Creek* - Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located within the public right-of-way and medians along: 1. Camino Tassajara median from Knolls Creek Road east to soccer field entrance; 2. Camino Tassajara south side frontage from Knolls Creek Road east to soccer field entrance; 3. Charbray Street median and park strips from Camino Tassajara south to the trailhead (including bio filtration strips); 4. Massara Street median and park strips from Charbray Street to Drysdale Street; and 5. Casablanca Street park strips from Knolls Creek south to Charbray Street. *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior sections of this Zone, which are currently owned and maintained by a homeowner’s association per conditions of approval. However, the maximum assessment rate, when established, included these interior areas as being maintained and operated by the District. Therefore, if the homeowner’s association fails to maintain these interior sections to County standards, the County may take over maintenance of these areas and increase the assessment to its maximum allowable rate. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART A ccc1920_FER - 12 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 70 (Intervening Properties - Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located within the public right-of-way and medians along: 1. South side frontage from Hansen Lane east to the limits of the Intervening Properties development; 2. Monterosso Street west and east side street frontages, and medians from Camino Tassajara south to Casablanca Street; 3. Casablanca Street frontage from Menton Street east to the Alamo Creek tributary bridge; 4. Entry monument on Camino Tassajara and Monterosso Street; and 5. Camino Tassajara median islands from Hansen Lane to Knollview Drive. *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior sections of this Zone which are owned and maintained by a homeowner’s association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these interior areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of the District.  Zone 71 (Diablo Vista Ballfields* - Danville Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements at: 1. 15 acre Diablo Vista Ballfield. *Please Note: Per the December 15, 2009 Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the Town of Danville, San Ramon Valley Unified School District (SRVUSD), and Contra Costa County, SRVUSD is responsible for enhanced maintenance of this area.  Zone 74 (Bella Flora* - Richmond Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located within the public right-of-way along: 1. Martin Drive, east side frontage; 2. Ellison Lane, south side frontage; 3. Spears Circle Park (0.50 acres, located at intersection of Malcolm Drive and Spears Circle); *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior of Subdivision 9293 which are planned to be owned and maintained by a homeowner’s association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these interior areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of the District. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART A ccc1920_FER - 13 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 75 (Belmont Terrace* - Pacheco Area) Landscaping, irrigation, and related improvements located within the public right-of-way along: 1. Pacheco Boulevard frontage from Falling Star Drive to Little Valley Road; and 2. North side of Pacheco Boulevard frontage fronting Subdivision 8967. *Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior of Subdivisions 8967 and 8984 which are owned and maintained by a homeowner’s association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these interior areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of the District. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART B ccc1920_FER - 14 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PART B ESTIMATE OF COST The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 provides that the total cost of construction, operation, maintenance, and servicing of the public landscaping, irrigation, lighting (not street lighting except in special cases), and park facilities can be recovered by the District. Incidental expenses including administration of the District, engineering fees, legal fees, and all other costs associated with the construction, operation and maintenance, and servicing of the District can also be included. Benefit zones 1, 2, 4, 10, and 45 are anticipated to have negative fund balances at the end of Fiscal Year 2019-20. In an effort to reduce the negative balances each year, there may be a temporary reduction of services in those areas of the County. Eventually these Zone balances will not be negative and will begin to build reserves for incidental costs and improvements within the Benefit Zone. The estimated Fiscal Year 2019-20 expenditures and assessment revenue for the proposed District facilities have been provided by the County and are summarized in Table 2 on the following page: Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART B ccc1920_FER - 15 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. Legend: PWGM = Public Works Grounds Maintenance HOA = Homeowners Association SRVUSD = San Ramon Valley Unified School District Ambrose = Ambrose Recreation & Park District Discovery Bay CSD = Discovery Bay Community Services District A detailed “Special Districts Worksheet” for each Benefit Zone is shown in Appendix “A” of this Report. The worksheets provide actual revenues and estimated expenditure details for Fiscal Year 2018-19 and proposed revenue and expenditure details for Fiscal Year 2019-20. Public playground safety and accessibility standards are mandated by two legal requirements. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 became effective in 1992 and required all public facilities (including playgrounds) be free of architectural barriers to access by January 1, 1995. Secondly, California Playground Safety Regulations R-39-97, mandated compliance with federal playground safety standards by the year 2000. This law requires that all playground equipment areas accessible to the public be audited/inspected for safety. These standards are established by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) in their document "Standard Consumer Safety Performance Specification for Playground Equipment for Public Use", and by the federal Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) in their document "Public Playground Handbook Table 2: FY2019-20 Summary Zone Zone Description Number of Parcels June 30, 2019 Projected Fund Balance FY 2019-20 Revenue FY 2019-20 Expenditures FY 2019-20 Capital Projects FY 2019-20 Operating Reserves Maintained By 1, 2, 4 Lynbrook Development 684 ($59,999.35) $61,327.84 ($54,309.12) $0.00 $0.00 PWGM/Ambrose 3 Hickory Meadows 78 $29,179.11 $14,046.24 ($7,755.00) $28,447.23 $7,023.12 Ambrose 5 Pacheco Beautification 908 $134,604.36 $61,196.08 ($60,266.00) $105,086.40 $30,448.04 PWGM 7 Pleasant Hill BART 253 $30,744.56 $82,258.64 ($78,767.00) $0.00 $34,236.20 Contra Costa Centre 10 Viewpointe 119 ($58,041.13) $18,071.34 ($15,423.00) $0.00 $0.00 PWGM/Ambrose 11 Hilltop Commons 1 $23,006.78 $6,000.00 ($2,751.00) $23,255.78 $3,000.00 PWGM 17 Shadow Creek 477 $167,475.68 $72,550.00 ($97,058.00) $107,192.68 $35,775.00 PWGM 18 Pacheco Manor 22 $1,854.43 $3,870.68 ($2,740.70) $1,113.76 $1,870.65 PWGM 19 Hidden Pond 130 $22,021.60 $26,000.00 ($26,664.50) $8,357.10 $13,000.00 PWGM 21 Kensington Area 2,257 $19,846.32 $30,660.74 ($26,929.00) $8,247.69 $15,330.37 PWGM 22 Seabreeze 154 $45,547.21 $44,660.00 ($50,197.40) $17,679.81 $22,330.00 PWGM 27 Bettencourt Ranch & Somerset 572 $11,607.08 $79,193.28 ($67,257.36) $0.00 $23,543.00 PWGM 35 Sandy Cove Shopping Center 9 $267,880.15 $36,757.56 ($26,617.44) $259,641.49 $18,378.78 Discovery Bay CSD 36 Alamo Beautification 5,509 $57,088.39 $51,392.00 ($50,356.28) $32,914.83 $25,209.28 PWGM 37 Clyde Area 286 $12,205.94 $12,135.04 ($13,215.56) $5,057.90 $6,067.52 PWGM 38 Rodeo Area 2,565 ($6,238.40) $84,831.34 ($78,592.94) $0.00 $0.00 PWGM 42 California Skyline 343 $43,824.40 $72,030.00 ($72,023.44) $7,815.96 $36,015.00 PWGM/Ambrose 45 Alamo Villas 10 ($3,294.58) $1,200.00 ($930.44) $0.00 $0.00 PWGM 48 Mrack Road 72 $24,636.91 $35,280.00 ($38,397.95) $3,878.96 $17,640.00 PWGM 54 Alamo Country 93 $42,691.17 $38,550.36 ($36,908.15) $25,058.20 $19,275.18 PWGM 57 Pacific Waterways 379 $22,842.19 $87,549.00 ($84,972.24) $0.00 $25,418.95 Discovery Bay CSD 61 Discovery Bay West 1,925 $284,913.37 $300,683.20 ($251,120.40) $184,134.57 $150,341.60 Discovery Bay CSD 63 Parkway Estates 87 $60,561.23 $20,010.00 ($18,789.78) $51,776.45 $10,005.00 PWGM 64 California Reflections 31 $62,177.47 $7,750.00 ($7,425.69) $58,626.78 $3,875.00 PWGM 68 Wendt Ranch 125 $11,976.73 $625.00 ($571.68) $11,717.55 $312.50 HOA 69 Alamo Creek 810 $55,294.88 $4,209.10 ($1,716.70) $55,682.73 $2,104.55 HOA 70 Intervening Properties 379 $86,142.75 $85,200.00 ($83,956.11) $44,786.64 $42,600.00 PWGM 71 Diablo Vista Ballfields 1,059 $5,361.51 $126,801.00 ($126,055.12) $0.00 $6,107.39 SRVUSD 74 Bella Flora 176 $260,140.10 $60,520.00 ($57,584.06) $232,816.04 $30,260.00 PWGM 75 Belmont Terrace 219 $7,985.11 $821.58 ($652.17)$7,743.73 $410.79 HOA 19,732 $1,664,035.97 * $1,526,180.02 ($1,440,004.23) $1,281,032.28 $580,577.92 *The Fiscal Year 2019-20 revenue includes the proposed assessment revenue of $1,524,009.54 and $2,170.48 in other revenues for all associated zones. Other revenues include earnings on investments and interfund transfers for Zones 5, 17 and 36. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART B ccc1920_FER - 16 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. for Safety". Landscape and lighting zones that have existing playground equipment that does not meet these federal and state guidelines must either retrofit or replace that equipment. The Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that a special fund be set up for the revenues and expenditures of each Benefit Zone. Funds raised by the assessments shall only be used for the purpose as stated herein. A contribution to each Benefit Zone by Contra Costa County may be made to reduce the assessments, as the Board of Supervisors deems appropriate. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART C ccc1920_FER - 17 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PART C ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM The boundaries of the Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) are completely within the boundaries of Contra Costa County. The Assessment Diagram for the Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) is on file in the Office of the Contra Costa County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and the Contra Costa County Public Works Department. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor, for the year when this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Report as shown in Appendix “B”. Assessment District 1979-3 (LL-2)Contra Costa County Zone 38 Zone 64Zone 11 Zone 74Zone 63 Zone 21 Zone 37 Zone 42 Zone 22Zone 18 Zone 5 Zone 19 Zone 7 Zone 54 Zone 36 Zone 27 Zone 17 Zone 71Zone 70Zone 48 Zone 69Zone 68 Zone 1,2 & 4Zone 3 Zone 10 Zone 61 Zone 35Zone 57 Zone 75 N:\Contra\FY18 -19\LL-2\Diagrams\Zones_overview.pdf (Last Update 2016-04-0 8 SA) Zone 45 ZONE DESCRIPTION 1, 2, & 43571011171819212227353637384245485457616364686970717475 Lynbrook D evelopment, Bay P oin t A reaHickory Mea dows, Bay Point AreaPacheco Beautification, Pa checo AreaPleasant Hill/BART, Contra Costa Centre AreaViewpointe, Bay Poin t A reaHilltop Com mons, San Pa blo A reaShadow Creek, D anville A reaPacheco M anor, Pa checo AreaHidden P ond, Reliez V alley/Martinez AreaKensington, K ensin gton AreaSeabreeze, Bay Point AreaBettencourt Ranch a nd Somerset, D anville A reaSandy Cove Shopping Center, D iscovery Bay A reaAlamo Beautification , Alamo A reaClyde, Clyde A reaRodeo, Rodeo A reaCalifornia Skylin e, Bay Point AreaAlamo Villa s, A la mo AreaMrack Road, Danv ille AreaAlamo Coun try, Alamo A reaPacific Waterways, D iscovery Bay AreaDiscovery Ba y West, Disc overy Bay AreaParkway Estates, North Rich mond AreaCalifornia Reflections, Pin ole A reaWendt Ra nch, D anville A reaAlamo Creek, D anville A reaIntervening Properties, Dan ville AreaDiablo Vista Ballfields, D anv ille AreaBella F lora, Richm ond AreaBelmont Terra ce, Pach eco Area Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 19 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PART D METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT This section explains the benefits to be derived from the improvements and the methodology used to apportion the total assessments to the properties within the District. The method used for apportioning the assessment is based upon the relative special benefits to be derived by the properties in each Benefit Zone of the District over and above the general benefits conferred on real property to the public at large. The assessment is apportioned to each parcel in proportion to the relative cost of the special benefits from the improvements. Discussion of Benefit Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the operation, maintenance, and servicing of landscaping, and street lighting improvements. Section 22573 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states: "The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements." “The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 (commencing with Section 5000)) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California]." In addition, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement" (Sec. 22574). Thus, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 requires the levy of a true "assessment" rather than a "special tax." Article XIIID, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218, approved by the California voters in November 1996) limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. “No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.” In addition, Article XIIID also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights- Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 20 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways, and that portion of public property that is not developed and used for business purposes similar to those for private, commercial, industrial and institutional activities. Special versus General Benefit On November 5, 1996 California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote On Taxes Act" which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for fees, charges and benefit assessments. These new procedures stipulate that even if charges or benefit assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, future increases in the charges or benefit assessments must comply with the provisions of Proposition 218. However, if the future increase in the charge or benefit assessment were anticipated in the charge or benefit assessment formula when approved by property owners (e.g., consumer price index increases or a predetermined cap) then the future increase in the charge or benefit assessment would be in compliance with the intent and provisions of Proposition 218. Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and defines a special benefit as a particular and distinct benefit conferred on real property and not a general benefit received by the public at large. Parcels located within the boundaries of the District will be assessed for the operation, maintenance and capital replacement costs associated with landscaping and park improvements as described herein, if they receive a special and direct benefit from the improvements. Furthermore, the identification and separation of general benefits from the special benefits follows for the District and the associated Benefit Zones. In the absence of an annual assessment, the improvements in each Benefit Zone of the District would not be provided, therefore the improvements are “over and above” what is being provided in other portions of the County as part of the Public Works Facilities Division. All assessment proceeds derived from each Benefit Zone are utilized to fund the cost of providing a level of tangible “special benefits” in the form of proximate landscaping and other permanent public improvements. The assessments are also structured to provide specific improvements within each Benefit Zone, further ensuring that the improvements funded by the assessments are of specific and special benefit to property within each Benefit Zone. Specific benefits conferred on property include:  Unique proximity to improved landscaped areas;  Access to improved landscape and park areas;  Improved aesthetic views within each Benefit Zone; and  Extension of a property’s outdoor area due to the properties being in close proximity to the landscape and park improvements. Properties outside the District’s Benefit Zones do not enjoy the unique proximity, access, views and other special benefits described previously. Moreover, many of the homes and other improvements on parcels in the Benefit Zones would not have been built if the assessments were not established, because an assessment for public landscaping and parks was a condition of approval for the associated developments. Without the annual assessments, the public Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 21 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. improvements and annual maintenance provided within the Benefit Zones would not exist and the areas would turn into unmaintained and unusable public improvements and public lands. If this happened, it would create a significant and material negative impact on the desirability, utility and value of property in the Benefit Zone. The improvements are, therefore, clearly above what otherwise would be provided. In fact, it is reasonable to assume that if assessments were not collected and the improvements were not maintained as a result, properties in the Benefit Zones would decline in desirability, utility and value by significantly more than the amount of the assessments. Although these improvements may be available to the public at large, the public landscaping, parks, and other public improvements in each Benefit Zone of the District were specifically designed, located and created to provide additional and improved public resources for the direct advantage of property inside each Benefit Zone, and not the public at large. The boundaries of the Benefit Zones have been narrowly drawn to include only those parcels that receive a direct advantage from the improvements. In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners receive within each of the Benefit Zones from these enhanced landscaping and park improvements, there are also some incidental visual benefits received by vehicular and pedestrian traffic, or flow-through traffic which may pass by the landscaping and park improvements within the District. Even though these are incidental benefits, they must be accounted for and cannot be assessed to the properties within the District and each associated Benefit Zone. Therefore, based on flow-through traffic, it is conservatively estimated that approximately 99% of the annual cost to operate and maintain the landscaping and park improvements would be a special and direct benefit to the parcels within the District and one percent of the annual cost to operate and maintain the landscaping and park improvements would be a general benefit. It is therefore concluded that all the landscape improvements funded by the assessments confer special benefits to the identified benefiting properties located within the District and each associated Benefit Zone and that the value of the special benefits from such improvements to property in the Benefit Zones reasonably exceeds the cost of the assessments for every assessed parcel in a Benefit Zone. In other words, as required by Proposition 218, the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel reasonably exceeds the cost of the assessments. Furthermore, the County owns, maintains, rehabilitates and replaces curb and gutter along the border of each of the Benefit Zone improvements. This curb and gutters serve to support, contain, retain, manage irrigation flow and plant growth, and provide a boundary for the improvements. The contribution from the County towards general benefit from the maintenance, rehabilitation and replacement of the curb and gutter is conservatively estimated to be at least one percent. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 22 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PARKS BENEFIT DETERMINATION The overall quality of life and desirability of an area is enhanced when public parks and recreational facilities are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained. Conversely, property desirability decreases when park and recreational facilities are unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. Property desirability in an area also increases when there is an increase in the number of parks, recreation centers and sports facilities. These park and recreational facilities enable property owners to participate in sporting events, leisure activities, picnics, organized social events and other miscellaneous activities. Studies in a number of communities, including counties and cities throughout the United States, have indicated that recreation areas and facilities, if well maintained and wisely administered, have caused a marked increase in the property values of parcels in the community. Consequently, such recreation and park facilities have proved to be an important factor in maintaining a sound economic condition and a high standard of livability in the community. These studies confirm the opinion long held by planning authorities as to the economic value of parks and recreational facilities in a community. "The recreation value is realized as a rise in the value of land and other property in or near the recreation area, and is of both private interest to the landowner and others, holding an economic stake in the area, and of public interest to the taxpayers, who have a stake " (National Recreation and Park Association, June 1985) “Recreation and park amenities are central components in establishing the quality of life in a community… [businesses’] main resource is their employees for whom quality of life is an important issue. The availability and attractiveness of local parks and programs influences some company’s relocation decisions… the presence of a park encourages real estate development around it.” (California Parks & Recreation, Winter 1997) The benefit of parks and other recreational facilities to residential and commercial/industrial properties has been summarized by a number of studies. The United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, in a publication of June 1984, concluded that:  "Parks and recreation stimulate business and generate tax revenues."  "Parks and recreation help conserve land, energy, and resources."  "An investment in parks and recreation helps reduce pollution and noise, makes communities more livable, and increases property values."  "Public recreation benefits all employers by providing continuing opportunities to maintain a level of fitness throughout one's working life, and through helping individuals cope with the stress of a fast-paced and demanding life." Proper maintenance and operation of the parks within the District benefits those properties within the service areas of the parks by providing environmental quality and recreational enhancement. The amount of benefit received will vary with the different land use on the property. There are two categories from which the total benefit of a parcel is derived: Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 23 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. 1. Environmental Quality Benefit. The improvement of the quality of air, visual aesthetics and attractiveness of the community as a place to live and work and do business. 2. Recreation Enhancement Benefit. The availability and access to usable and safe park and recreational facilities. Recent studies have shown that adequate park and recreation facilities and recreation programs help to reduce crime and vandalism. This results in savings to property owners and improved property values and promotes the well-being of the community. LANDSCAPING BENEFIT DETERMINATION Trees, landscaping, hardscaping, and appurtenant facilities, if well maintained, provide beautification, shade, and enhancement of the desirability of the surroundings. In Parkways and Land Values, written by John Nolan and Henry V. Hubbard in 1937, it is stated: "... there is no lack of opinion, based on general principals and experience and common sense, that parkways do in fact add value to property, even though the amount cannot be determined exactly. Indeed, in most cases where public money has been spent for parkways the assumption has been definitely made that the proposed parkway will show a provable financial profit to the City. It has been believed that the establishment of parkways causes a rise in real estate values throughout the City, or in parts of the City..." It should be noted that the definition of "parkways" above may include the roadway as well as the landscaping alongside the roadway. Proper maintenance and operation of the street landscaping provides beautification and enhancement of the desirability of surroundings. The Benefit Zones in the District enjoy a reputation for beauty, and the landscape improvements along the major thoroughfares in the medians and parkways enhance that reputation and benefit all parcels in each Benefit Zone. These major thoroughfares are the entryways into the various Benefit Zones and as such provide beautification to the entire Benefit Zone. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY The total operation, maintenance and servicing cost for the landscaping and public park facilities are apportioned in accordance with the methodology that is consistent with standard assessment engineering practices. The method for spreading the costs to each parcel is based on the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor, with the exception of Benefit Zone 7 assessments, which are assessed on potential floor area ratios for commercial/industrial parcels and Benefit Zone 35 assessments which are assessed on acreage. Since the assessment is levied on the owners of properties as shown on the tax rolls, the final charges must be assigned by Assessor's Parcel Number. If assessments were to be distributed by parcel, not considering land use, this would not be equitable because a single-family parcel would be paying the same as a 50-unit apartment parcel or a large commercial establishment. Therefore, Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 24 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. as previously stated, the total assessment costs are distributed to each parcel of land based on the number of EDUs associated with each particular parcel. Commercial and industrial parcels benefit similarly to residential parcels because of increased property values and the ability to have their workers and patrons use the park and recreational facilities. Commercial and industrial parcels are assessed based on their acreage because larger parcels have the ability to generate larger pedestrian flows. The methodology used to assign EDUs to other land uses in proportion to the benefit they receive relative to the single family residential parcel is shown below. Developed Single Family Residential - The developed single-family parcel has been selected as the basic unit for calculation of the benefit assessments. This basic unit shall be called an Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Parcels designated as developed single family residential uses per the Contra Costa County land use code are assessed one (1.00) EDU. Developed Multiple Residential - The EDUs for land designated as developed multi-family uses which includes townhomes, condominiums, mobile homes and apartments are assessed a factor of one-half (0.50) EDU per dwelling unit, e.g., a parcel with a 100-unit apartment would be assessed 50 EDUs. Based on data from representative cities in Northern California, the multiple family residential factor of fifty (50) percent is determined by the statistical proportion of relative trips generated from various types of residential uses, in combination with density per unit. Benefit Zones 18, 27 and 45 are assessed as 1.0 EDU per dwelling unit for townhomes and condominiums. Developed Commercial/Industrial, Recreational, Institutional, and Other Miscellaneous Uses - Developed commercial and industrial properties include commercial, industrial, recreational, institutional or miscellaneous uses per Contra Costa County land use codes. The parcels are assessed based upon their acreage. The parcels are assessed one (1.00) EDU for the first acre or any portion thereof, one (1.00) EDU/acre for each additional acre up to a maximum of three (3.00) EDUs. The minimum number of EDUs per parcel is one (1.00) EDU. Commercial, industrial, recreational, institutional or miscellaneous uses in Benefit Zone 7, both developed and undeveloped per Contra Costa County land use codes, are assessed based upon the potential floor area ratio of the parcel. The minimum rate per parcel will be one single family unit. Undeveloped Single Family Residential - Parcels defined as undeveloped single family residential parcels will be assessed at fifty (50) percent of the developed single-family rate or 0.50 EDU’s. Undeveloped Multiple Family Residential – The EDUs for land designated as undeveloped multi-family use which includes undeveloped townhomes, condominiums, mobile homes and apartments are assessed half of the developed EDU factor per planned dwelling unit. For example, a parcel that is planned for a 100-unit apartment complex would be assessed 25 EDUs. If the number of planned dwelling units are not known, then the rate is 0.50 EDUs/acre with a minimum of 0.50 EDUs and a maximum of 1.50 EDUs. Undeveloped Non-Single Family Residential - Parcels defined as undeveloped non-single family residential will be assessed at fifty (50) percent of the developed commercial/industrial Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 25 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. rate. These parcels include undeveloped commercial/industrial, recreational, institutional and other miscellaneous parcels. These parcels will be assessed at 0.50 EDUs per acre or any portion thereof, with a minimum of 0.50 EDU per parcel and a maximum of 1.50 EDUs per parcel (3.00 acres). Incremental acreage greater than 3.00 acres is considered to be open space area and therefore receives no further assessment. Undeveloped property is described as parcels with no improved structures. Property values increase for undeveloped parcels when public infrastructure improvements are installed and well maintained. Exempt - Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of all public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, all easements and rights-of- ways, all public parks, cemeteries, greenbelts and parkways, and all public school property, other public property, designated open space, and public utilities. Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 26 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. BENEFIT ZONE CLASSIFICATION As properties develop throughout the County, they are annexed into the District. A specific Benefit Zone may be created for these properties or they may be included within an existing Benefit Zone, which is unique and distinguishable from other Benefit Zones located within the District. Each Benefit Zone is evaluated to determine which improvements are of a specific and direct benefit to the parcels in that Benefit Zone. Once the improvements have been identified, a method of allocating those costs to the benefiting parcels is developed. The following is a listing of the various Benefit Zones in the District, their corresponding number of parcels/units in each Benefit Zone, and the method of apportioning the costs of the improvements. Some Benefit Zones include an increase each year as allowed by the assessment formula when the Benefit Zone was formed.  Zones 1, 2, and 4 (Lynbrook Development - Bay Point) Subdivisions 5354, 5380, 5533, 5534, 5695, 5696 (old 6622), and MS11-84. Formed: 1979 Zone 1: 329 parcels; Zone 2: 127 parcels; Zone 4: 228 parcels Single family parcels are assessed 1.00 EDU/parcel and multi-family units are assessed 0.50 EDUs/unit. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $76.16 per EDU  Zone 3 (Hickory Meadows - Bay Point Area) - Subdivision 5573 Formed: September 1979 78 Parcels Single family parcels are assessed 1.00 EDU/parcel and multi-family units are assessed 0.50 EDUs/unit. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $180.08 per EDU  Zone 5 (Pacheco Beautification Project – Pacheco Area) Formed: June 11, 2002 908 Parcels Zone 5 was formed in FY2002-03 with a maximum rate set at $46.50 per EDU + annual Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases for the San Francisco Bay Area - All Urban Consumers. The CPI starting index is 193.20 for June 30, 2002. The February 2019 CPI Index was 291.227, therefore the maximum rate is $70.10 per EDU. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $70.10 per EDU Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 27 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 7 (Pleasant Hill/BART – Contra Costa Centre Area) Formed: July 30, 1985 253 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed based upon their proportional share of benefit as follows: Residential property is assessed the FY 2019-20 maximum assessment rate of $16.12 per parcel Commercial parcels are assessed the FY 2019-20 maximum assessment rate of $.0291708 per potential or actual square foot, depending upon which amount is greater  Zone 10 (Viewpointe - Bay Point Area) Subdivision 6484 Formed: March 3, 1987 119 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. Single family parcels are assessed 1.00 EDU/parcel and multi-family units are assessed 0.50 EDUs/unit. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $151.86 per EDU  Zone 11 (Hilltop Commons - San Pablo Area) LUP 2042-85 Formed: February 10, 1987 1 Parcel This zone consists of multiple family residential units and there is one (1) parcel associated with all the residential units. The total assessment for this zone is assessed to the underlying parcel. The maximum assessment is $6,000, and the parcel will be assessed $6,000 for FY2019- 20. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $6,000 per parcel  Zone 17 (Shadow Creek – Danville Area) Subdivisions 7279, 7040 and 7041 Formed: April 25, 1989 477 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $150.00 per EDU Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 28 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 18 (Pacheco Manor – Pacheco Area) Subdivision 6958 Formed: June 7, 1988 22 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $175.94 per EDU  Zone 19 (Hidden Pond – Reliez Valley/Martinez Area) Subdivisions 6769, 7144, 7151, 7820, and 7821. Formed: August 7, 1990 Annexed Tract 7144: January 9, 1996 130 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $200.00 per EDU  Zone 21 (Kensington - Kensington Area) Formed: June 6, 1989 2,257 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment based upon their land use. Single family residential parcels located within the Kensington area shall be assessed $13.66/EDU. Multi-family/Residential units and Mobile Home units shall be assessed half the single-family rate per unit. Commercial will be assessed three times the single-family rate for each acre. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $13.66 per EDU  Zone 22 (Seabreeze – Bay Point Area) Subdivisions 7152 and 8830 Formed: August 13, 1991 Subdivision 8830 annexed February 26, 2008 – 17 single family parcels 154 Total Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $290.00 per EDU Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 29 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 27 (Bettencourt Ranch and Somerset – Danville Area) Subdivisions 7188, 7277, 7278, 7280 and 7763 Formed: August 6, 1991 572 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. In Fiscal Year 2004-05, in order to spread the costs in proportion to the benefit each parcel receives, subzone “A” was developed. Subzone “A” is Tract 7763 which is on a private street and receives a reduced level of landscaping. Each of the 421 parcels not located within subzone “A” (subdivisions 7188, 7277, 7278 and 7280) will be assessed at the FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate of $150.00 per EDU Subzone “A” Each of the 150 parcels located within subzone “A” (subdivision 7763) will be assessed approximately seventy (70) percent of the full assessment rate of $150.00, which is $105.68 per EDU.  Zone 35 (Sandy Cove Shopping Center – Discovery Bay Area) MS 39-91, DP 3031-94 and Tract 8456 Formed: May 5, 1998 9 Parcels Reconfirmed: May 13, 2003 In February 2003 the rate for commercial parcels was re-confirmed based upon their net developable acreage at $1,434.92/acre + CPI increases for the San Francisco Bay Area – All Urban Consumers. The CPI starting index is 197.70 for February 2003. The February 2019 CPI Index is 291.227, therefore the maximum rate is $2,113.72 per acre. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $2,113.72 per acre  Zone 36 (Alamo Beautification - Alamo Area) Formed: August 6, 1991 5,509 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $9.36 per single family parcel Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 30 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 37 (Clyde - Clyde Area) Formed: July 23, 1991 286 Parcels Each of the parcels located in this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $41.76 per parcel  Zone 38 (Rodeo - Rodeo Area) Formed: July 23, 1991 2,565 Parcels Each of the parcels located in this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. In order to spread the costs in proportion to the benefit, two subzones have been developed. Subzone “A” Parcels located within Subzone “A” will be assessed at the FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate of $32.04 per EDU. Subzone “B” Parcels located within Subzone “B” (View Point Park (Tracts 4326, 4327, 4328, 4329 and 4958) Subdivision) will be assessed at eighty-five (85) percent of the full assessment rate. Since these subdivisions have access to View Point Park through their homeowner’s association, it reduces the demand on the Lefty Gomez picnic and play area (exclusive of the Community Center). Therefore, the parcels in Benefit Subzone “B” will pay an assessment rate reduced by $4.80 per EDU or $27.24 per EDU.  Zone 42 (California Skyline – Bay Point Area) Tracts 7597, 7737 and 7838 Formed: July 7, 1993; Tract 7838 Annexed June 11, 1996 343 Parcels Each of the parcels located in this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $210.00 per EDU  Zone 45 (Alamo Villas – Alamo Area) Tract 7559 Formed: July 26, 1994 10 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $120.00 per EDU Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 31 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 48 (Oakgate Drive – Danville Area) Subdivisions 7613, 7621, 7776, 7777, 7778, 7779, 7780, 8104 and DP03-3009 (4 parcels) Formed: July 26, 1994 DP03-3009 (MS04-0020) annexed July 12, 2005 – 4 parcels 72 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $490.00 per EDU  Zone 54 (Alamo Country – Alamo) Subdivisions 7601 and 7818 Formed: December 20, 1994; Rate Increase July 8, 2002 93 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. The maximum rate was increased in FY2002-03 and set at $275.00 per EDU + CPI. The CPI had a starting index of 193.20 as of June 30, 2002. The February 2019 CPI Index is 291.227, therefore the maximum rate is $414.52 per EDU. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $414.52 per EDU  Zone 57 (Pacific Waterways – Discovery Bay Area) Subdivisions 7679, 7881, 7907, 7908 and 7909. Formed: December 20, 1994 379 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $231.00 per EDU Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 32 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 61 (Discovery Bay West - Discovery Bay Area) Tract 7686, 8143, 8166, 8167, 8023, 8428, 8429, 8430, 8431, 8432, 8433, 8570, 8571, 8572, 8577, 8578, 8579, 8580, 8827, 8828, 8892, 8993, and 9067. Formed: November 2, 1999 1,925 parcels Each of the parcels at build-out will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. The maximum rate for this zone was set at $200.00 per EDU. However, the maximum rate was decreased to $190.00 per EDU in FY2001-02 due to the formation of a separate Benefit Parking District. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $190.00 per EDU FY 2019-20 Applied Rate: $160.00 per EDU  Zone 63 (Parkway Estates – North Richmond Area) Tract 7903 Formed: October 27, 1997 87 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $230.00 per EDU  Zone 64 (California Reflections – Pinole Area) Tract 7661 Formed: January 9, 1996 31 Parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $300.00 per EDU FY 2019-20 Applied Rate: $250.00 per EDU  Zone 68 (Wendt Ranch – Danville Area) Tract 8002 Formed: October 10, 2000 Modified: Fiscal Year 2005-06 125 Parcels at build out Each of the 125 parcels at build-out located in this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total assessment. The maximum rate for FY 2019-20 is $300.00 per EDU. However, this area is currently maintained by a homeowner’s association, so therefore the rate for FY 2019-20 has been set at $5.00 per EDU to cover administrative costs. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $300.00 per EDU FY 2019-20 Applied Rate: $5.00 per EDU Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 33 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 69 (Alamo Creek – Danville Area) Tract 8382, and 8381 Formed: June 12, 2006 679 single family, 127 townhomes and 120 unit senior housing at build out Each of the parcels located within this zone is assessed an equal share of the total assessment. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, townhomes are assessed at 0.50 EDU/parcel and the senior housing is assessed at 0.50 EDU/unit. It is estimated that at build out of the zone the total amount needed to maintain the public improvements for Zone 69 on an annual basis is $853,185.90 (FY2006-07 dollars). (679 single family units * 1.00 EDU) + (127 townhomes * 0.50) + (120 senior units * 0.50) = 802.50 EDUs $853,185.90 divided by 802.50 EDUs = $1,063.16/EDU The maximum assessment rate was set in Fiscal Year 2006-07 at $1,063.16 per EDU with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% or CPI increase (if greater than 2%) each fiscal year which is based upon the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers as of June 2006 (209.1). The February 2019 CPI Index is 291.227, therefore the maximum rate for Fiscal Year 2019-20 is $1,480.73 per EDU. However, this area is currently maintained by a homeowner’s association, so therefore the rate has been set at $5.00 per EDU to cover administrative costs. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $1,480.73 per EDU FY 2019-20 Applied Rate: $5.00 per EDU  Zone 70 (Intervening Properties – Danville Area) Tract 8331 Formed: October 4, 2005 378 single family parcels and 96 apartment units Each of the parcels located within this zone is assessed an equal share of the total annual assessment. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel, and the apartment complex is assessed at 0.50 EDU/unit. The maximum assessment rate was set in Fiscal Year 2005-06 at $315.00 per EDU with an allowance for a minimum of a 2% or CPI increase (if greater than 2%) each fiscal year which is based upon the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers as of June 2005 (201.20). The February 2019 CPI Index is 291.227, therefore the maximum rate for FY 2019-20 is $455.97 per EDU. The rate has been set at $200.00 per EDU. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $455.97 per EDU FY 2019-20 Applied Rate: $200.00 per EDU Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 34 - Francisco & Associates, Inc.  Zone 71 (Diablo Vista Ballfields – Danville Area) Tract 8331, 8381, and 8382 Formed: October 4, 2005 1,059 single family parcels Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed an equal share of the total annual assessment. Zone 71 was annexed in FY2005-06 and the maximum assessment rate was set at $80.00 per EDU with an allowance for a CPI increase each fiscal year which is based upon the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers as of June 2005 (201.20). Zone 71 was created per a Settlement Agreement (January 27, 2004) with the Town of Danville, Contra Costa County, the San Ramon Valley Unified School District, and the project developers. Each year the revenue will be collected and used to provide for the enhanced maintenance of the ball fields. Approximately $5.00/EDU each year will be used to cover administrative costs associated with levying the assessment. The February 2019 CPI Index is 291.227, therefore the maximum rate for Fiscal Year 2019-20 is $115.80 per EDU. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $115.80 per EDU FY 2019-20 Applied Rate: $115.80 per EDU *Please Note: Per the December 15, 2009 Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement between the Town of Danville, San Ramon Valley Unified School District (SRVUSD) and Contra Costa County, SRVUSD is responsible for maintenance of this area.  Zone 74 (Bella Flora – Richmond Area) Subdivisions 8755 and 9293 (old 8938) Formed: June 12, 2006 (Resolution 2006/370) 177 single family parcels and 2 industrial parcels Each of the parcels within this zone is assessed its share of the total assessment for this zone. Single family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel. It was estimated that at build out of the zone the total amount needed to maintain the public improvements for Zone 74 on an annual basis was $260,250 (FY2007-08 dollars). In March 2018, the County Planning Commission approved the change in land use for a proposed multi-family residential development to an industrial business park. As a result, there are two (2) undeveloped properties within the zone that are approved to develop into an industrial business park, rather than the intended multi-family residential use. (177 single family units * 1.00 EDU) + (2 undeveloped industrial parcels * 0.5 EDU) = 178.00 EDUs Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART D ccc1920_FER - 35 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. The maximum assessment rate was set at $550.00 per EDU with an allowance for a minimum of a two (2) percent or CPI increase (if greater than 2%) each fiscal year which is based upon the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers as of June 2006 (209.1). The February 2019 CPI Index is 291.227, therefore the maximum rate is $766.04 per EDU. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $766.04 per EDU FY 2019-20 Applied Rate: $340.00 per EDU  Zone 75 (Belmont Terrace – Pacheco Area) Tracts 8984, 8967 and an institutional parcel Formed: February 27, 2007 Annexation: Subdivision 8967 (89 Courtyard units and 1 institutional parcel), May 13, 2008 217 courtyard units + 1 single family parcel + 1 institutional parcel Each of the parcels located within this zone will be assessed their benefiting share of the total assessment for this zone. The courtyard homes are classified as townhomes per the County Assessor and parcels are assessed at 0.75 EDU/parcel and single-family parcels are assessed at 1.00 EDU/parcel. The 0.91 acre institutional parcel is assessed 1.00 EDU based on its acreage. It is estimated that at build out of the Zone the total amount needed to maintain the public improvements for Zone 75 on an annual basis is $42,525.88 (FY2008-09 dollars). (217 courtyard units *0.75 EDU/unit) = 162.75 EDUs (1 single family parcel *1.00 EDU/parcel) = 1.00 EDU (0.96 institutional acres) = 1.00 EDU The maximum assessment rate was set at $254.11 per EDU with an allowance for a minimum of a two (2) percent or CPI increase (if greater than 2%) each fiscal year which is based upon the San Francisco Bay Area All Urban Consumers as of June 2006 (209.1). The February 2019 CPI Index is 291.227, therefore the maximum rate for Fiscal Year 2019-20 is $353.90 per EDU. However, this area is currently maintained by a Homeowner’s Association, so therefore the rate for Fiscal Year 2019-20 has been set at $5.00 per EDU to cover administrative costs. FY 2019-20 Maximum Assessment Rate: $353.90 per EDU FY 2019-20 Applied Rate: $5.00 per EDU Contra Costa County SECTION II Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 PART E ccc1920_FER - 36 - Francisco & Associates, Inc. PART E PROPERTY LIST AND ASSESSMENT ROLL The total assessment amount for each Benefit Zone and the proposed assessment amount apportioned to each parcel for Fiscal Year 2019-20, in proportion to the benefit received by each parcel from the improvements, is contained in the Assessment Roll, which is on file in the Office of the Contra Costa County Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, the Contra Costa County Public Works Department, the Contra Costa County Public Works website and shown in Appendix C. The Assessment Roll includes a list of all parcel numbers within the District that have been updated to match the last equalized Property Tax Roll of the Contra Costa County Assessor, which by reference is hereby made a part of this report. The last equalized Property Tax Roll includes a description of each parcel and shall govern for all details concerning the description of the parcels. The total proposed assessment for the 2019-20 Fiscal Year is $1,524,009.54 Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A ccc1920_FER Francisco & Associates, Inc. APPENDIX A DETAILED PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zones 1, 2 & 4 / Fund 2830 (LYNBROOK DEVELOPMENT - BAY POINT) Maximum assessment is: $76.16 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $76.16 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $38.08 / MFR Unit 805.25 EDUs 684 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 26 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 (88,258.94)$ ($59,999.35) Revenues: Taxes and assessments $61,365.92 $61,327.84 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $20,000.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $81,365.92 $61,327.84 Total Revenue Available (6,893.02)$ $1,328.49 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($832.25) ($850.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($601.69) ($1,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($11,213.27) ($12,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($1,126.00) ($1,126.00) Professional Services (County Staff) ($1,750.00) ($1,750.00) Lynbrook Park Maintenance* ($37,583.12)($37,583.12) Total Expenditures ($53,106.33) ($54,309.12) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year (59,999.35)$ ($52,980.63) *Please Note: Per the June 26, 2012 JEPA between Contra Costa County and Ambrose Recreation & Park District, Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for Lynbrook Park. Maintenance Strategy: Services have been adjusted to accommodate the exhausted budget. There is planned savings of $6,446 annually through 2031 to eliminate the negative balance. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_01,2,4 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 3 / Fund 2831 (HICKORY MEADOWS - BAY POINT) Maximum assessment is: $180.08 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $180.08 / EDU 78.00 EDUs 78 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 26 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $24,522.63 $29,179.11 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $14,046.24 $14,046.24 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $14,046.24 $14,046.24 Total Revenue Available $38,568.87 $43,225.35 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($316.30) ($317.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 ($3.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity (750.34) ($1,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) $0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff) (3,259.88) ($292.00) Professional Services (County Staff) ($920.24) ($2,000.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Hickory Meadows Park Maintenance* ($4,143.00)($4,143.00) Total Expenditures ($9,389.76) ($7,755.00) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvement Projects $0.00 $28,447.23 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $7,023.12 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $35,470.35 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $29,179.11 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Planned improvements every five (5) years beginning in 2018. Estimated expense will be $10,000. Services will be coordinated with Ambrose Recreation & Park District. *Please Note: Per the June 26, 2012 JEPA between Contra Costa County and Ambrose Recreation & Park District, Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for Hickory Meadows Park. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_03 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 5 / Fund 2824 (PACHECO BEAUTIFICATION - PACHECO AREA) Maximum assessment is: $70.10 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $70.10 / EDU 868.73 EDUs 908 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 26 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $109,370.54 $134,604.36 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $58,781.48 $60,896.08 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $486.95 $300.00 Measure WW Grant Funds $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $59,268.43 $61,196.08 Total Revenue Available $168,638.97 $195,800.44 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($1,020.95) ($1,021.00) Interfund Exp ($25.00) ($25.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($5,471.78) ($5,520.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) ($300.00) ($6,500.00) Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($16,299.31) ($37,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($1,100.00) ($1,200.00) Professional Services (County Staff) ($8,972.73) ($9,000.00) Vandalism/Incidentals ($844.84)$0.00 Total Expenditures ($34,034.61) ($60,266.00) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvement Projects $0.00 $105,086.40 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $30,448.04 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $135,534.44 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $134,604.36 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-02 193.20 $46.50 Feb-14 248.62 2.45% $59.84 Feb-15 254.91 2.53% $61.36 Feb-16 262.60 3.02% $63.21 Feb-17 271.63 3.44% $65.38 Feb-18 281.31 3.56% $67.71 Feb-19 291.23 3.53% $70.10 Maintenance Strategy: Evaluate, trim and replace trees. Anticipated $5,000 annually and $10,000 every 5 years to replant median. The next median project will take place in 2021. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_05 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 7 / Fund 2834 (PLEASANT HILL/BART - CONTRA COSTA CENTRE AREA) Maximum assessment is: $16.12 / SFR Parcel FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $16.12 / SFR Parcel FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $0.0291708 / SQ FT 253 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 27 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $22,067.58 $30,744.56 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $81,433.62 $82,258.64 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Reimbursements - Gov/Gov $10,000.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $91,433.62 $82,258.64 Total Revenue Available $113,501.20 $113,003.20 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($462.50) ($463.00) Interfund Exp ($3.00) ($3.00) Building Occupancy Cost ($0.94) ($1.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($36,925.60) ($30,550.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) ($38,149.15) ($38,150.00) Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($527.73) ($600.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($1,493.01) ($1,500.00) Professional Services (County Staff) ($2,319.71) ($4,500.00) Vandalism/Incidentals ($2,875.00)($3,000.00) Total Expenditures ($82,756.64) ($78,767.00) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $34,236.20 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $34,236.20 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $30,744.56 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Currently developing fund for future improvements. The next scheduled project will be to trim trees in Fox Creek Park in 2020. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_07 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 10 / Fund 2836 (VIEWPOINTE - BAY POINT AREA) Maximum assessment is: $151.86 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $151.86 / EDU 119.00 EDUs 119 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 27 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 ($28,269.41) ($58,041.13) Revenues: Taxes and assessments $18,071.34 $18,071.34 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $18,071.34 $18,071.34 Total Revenue Available ($10,198.07) ($39,969.79) Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($351.15) ($352.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($5,566.58) ($6,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($5,120.08) ($5,600.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($332.00) ($331.00) Professional Services (County Staff) ($900.00) ($900.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Viewpointe Park Maintenance* ($35,573.25)($2,240.00) Total Expenditures ($47,843.06) ($15,423.00) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $0.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $0.00 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year ($58,041.13) ($55,392.79) Maintenance Strategy: Currently developing fund for future improvements. *Please Note: Per the June 26, 2012 JEPA between Contra Costa County and Ambrose Recreation & Park District, Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for Viewpoint Park. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_10 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 11 / Fund 2839 (HILLTOP COMMONS - SAN PABLO AREA) Maximum assessment is: $6,000.00 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $6,000.00 / EDU 1.00 EDUs 1 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 27 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $19,320.09 $23,006.78 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $6,000.00 $6,000.00 Total Revenue Available $25,320.09 $29,006.78 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($250.85) ($251.00) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($562.46) ($1,500.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) $0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (County Staff) ($1,000.00) ($1,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals ($500.00)$0.00 Total Expenditures ($2,313.31) ($2,751.00) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $23,255.78 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $3,000.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $26,255.78 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $23,006.78 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Build the fund for future improvements. Evaluate in 2023 and every five (5) years thereafter. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_11 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 17 / Fund 2844 (SHADOW CREEK - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum assessment is: $150.00 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $150.00 / EDU 477.00 EDUs 477 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 27 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $159,539.70 $167,475.68 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $71,550.00 $71,550.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $1,623.18 $1,000.00 Annual Revenue $73,173.18 $72,550.00 Total Revenue Available $232,712.88 $240,025.68 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($655.45) ($656.00) Interfund Exp ($2.00) ($2.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($22,731.29) ($25,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($37,190.19) ($60,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($1,400.00) ($1,400.00) Professional Services (County Staff) ($3,258.27) ($10,000.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($65,237.20) ($97,058.00) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $107,192.68 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $35,775.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $142,967.68 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $167,475.68 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: In FY 18/19 evaluate, trim and replace trees and assess irrigation. Service should not exceed $60,000. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_17 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 18 / Fund 2843 (PACHECO MANOR - PACHECO AREA) Maximum assessment is: $175.94 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $175.94 / EDU 22.00 EDUs 22 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page28 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $4,769.89 $1,854.43 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $3,870.68 $3,870.68 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $3,870.68 $3,870.68 Total Revenue Available $8,640.57 $5,725.11 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($268.70) ($268.70) Interfund Exp ($1.00) ($1.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($282.84) ($300.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($5,627.63) ($1,500.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($71.00) ($71.00) Professional Services (County Staff) ($534.97) ($600.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($6,786.14) ($2,740.70) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $1,113.76 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $1,870.65 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $2,984.41 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $1,854.43 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Building the fund for future improvements. There is an annual clean-up, not to exceed $1,200. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_18 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 19 / Fund 2849 (HIDDEN POND - RELIEZ VALLEY/MARTINEZ AREA) Maximum assessment is: $200.00 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $200.00 / EDU 130.00 EDUs 130 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 28 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $28,672.15 $22,021.60 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $26,000.00 $26,000.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $26,000.00 $26,000.00 Total Revenue Available $54,672.15 $48,021.60 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($360.50) ($360.50) Interfund Exp ($4.00) ($4.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($4,007.06) ($3,300.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) ($10,223.50) $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($15,078.80) ($20,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($476.69) ($500.00) Professional Services (County Staff) ($2,500.00) ($2,500.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($32,650.55) ($26,664.50) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $8,357.10 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $13,000.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $21,357.10 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $22,021.60 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Allocation of $10,000 every five (5) years to revitalize entry corners beginning Spring 2018. An additional annual tree trimming will be allocated not to exceed $1,200. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_19 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 21 / Fund 2846 (KENSINGTON AREA) Maximum assessment is: $13.66 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $13.66 / EDU 2,244.60 EDUs 2,257 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 28 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $26,844.42 $19,846.32 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $30,638.88 $30,660.74 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $30,638.88 $30,660.74 Total Revenue Available $57,483.30 $50,507.06 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($2,166.75) ($2,166.84) Interfund Exp ($2.00) ($2.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($1,126.63) ($1,200.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($29,242.68) ($20,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($562.00) ($560.16) Professional Services (County Staff) ($4,536.92) ($3,000.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($37,636.98) ($26,929.00) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $8,247.69 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $15,330.37 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $23,578.06 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $19,846.32 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Build Fund for future improvements. Schedule tree trimming along the Arlington Boulevard on even years and landscape improvements on Colusa Circle on odd years. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_21 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 22 / Fund 2857 (SEABREEZE - BAY POINT AREA) Maximum assessment is: $290.00 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $290.00 / EDU 154.00 EDUs 154 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 28 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $42,704.68 $45,547.21 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $44,660.00 $44,660.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $44,660.00 $44,660.00 Total Revenue Available $87,364.68 $90,207.21 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($380.90) ($380.90) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($20,875.36) ($26,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($19,240.88) ($20,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($818.80) ($816.50) Professional Services (County Staff) ($501.53) ($3,000.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($41,817.47) ($50,197.40) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $17,679.81 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $22,330.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $40,009.81 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $45,547.21 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Currently developing fund to build operating reserve. However, there is an unplanned maintenance need for a fallen fence. The anticipated cost is $20,000. Staff are currently reviewing options to cover the cost. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_22 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 27 / Fund 2855 (BETTENCOURT RANCH AND SOMERSET - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum Assessment is $150.00 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $150.00 / EDU 421.00 EDUs Subzone "A" FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $105.68 / EDU Subzone "A" EDU's 151.81 EDUs Method of apportionment located on page 29 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $12,375.56 $11,607.08 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $79,002.00 $79,193.28 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $79,002.00 $79,193.28 Total Revenue Available $91,377.56 $90,800.36 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($735.35) ($736.00) Interfund Exp ($2.00) ($2.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($47,732.84) ($40,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Facilities Maintenance ($75.00) ($75.00) Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($20,728.26) ($20,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($6,291.43) ($1,444.36) Professional Services (County Staff) ($4,205.60) ($5,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($79,770.48) ($67,257.36) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $23,543.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $23,543.00 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $11,607.08 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Separate water meter from the HOA subdivision. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_27 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 35 / Fund 2881 (SANDY COVE SHOPPING CENTER - DISCOVERY BAY AREA) Maximum Assessment is $2,113.72 / Acre FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $2,113.72 / Acre 17.39 Acres 9 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 29 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $240,376.91 $267,880.15 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $28,420.84 $36,757.56 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $2,597.10 $0.00 Annual Revenue $31,017.94 $36,757.56 Total Revenue Available $271,394.85 $304,637.71 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($257.65) ($257.65) Interfund Exp ($3.00) ($22.00) Communications ($600.00) ($600.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($1,996.01) ($2,500.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Vehicle Expense $0.00 ($4,000.00) Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 ($14,700.00) Grounds Maintenance - (in house) $0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($551.03) ($537.79) Professional Services (County Staff) ($107.01) ($4,000.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($3,514.70) ($26,617.44) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $259,641.49 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $18,378.78 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $278,020.27 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $267,880.15 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Feb-03 197.70 $1,434.92 Feb-14 248.62 2.45% $1,804.45 Feb-15 254.91 2.53% $1,850.14 Feb-16 262.60 3.02% $1,905.95 Feb-17 271.63 3.44% $1,971.46 Feb-18 281.31 3.56% $2,041.73 Feb-19 291.23 3.53% $2,113.72 Maintenance Strategy: Staff will coordinate needed upgrades with Discovery Bay. Further, staff will explore weed abatement and development of the path contingent on property rights. Planned median improvements every five (5) years not to exceed $10,000. Pedestrian bridge inspections and repairs every (4) years. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_35 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 36 / Fund 2852 (ALAMO BEAUTIFICATION - ALAMO AREA) Maximum assessment is: $9.36 / SFR Parcel FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $9.36 / SFR Parcel FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $4.68 / MFR Unit 5,397.60 EDUs 5,509 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 29 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $44,494.02 $57,088.39 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $50,484.08 $50,521.52 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $870.48 $870.48 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Boulevard of Trees $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $51,354.56 $51,392.00 Total Revenue Available $95,848.58 $108,480.39 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($4,929.07) ($4,929.07) Interfund Exp ($4.38) ($5.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($3,172.88) ($3,500.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($26,835.97) ($31,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($925.58) ($922.21) Professional Services (County Staff) ($2,892.31) ($10,000.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($38,760.19) ($50,356.28) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $32,914.83 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $25,209.28 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $58,124.11 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $57,088.39 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Annually evaluate, trim, and replace trees. Cost for improvements along Danville Boulevard not to exceed $2,000 and Stone Valley Road not to exceed $3,000. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_36 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 37 / Fund 2853 (CLYDE - CLYDE AREA) Maximum assessment is: $41.76 / SFR Parcel FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $41.76 / SFR Parcel FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $20.88 / MFR Unit 290.59 EDUs 286 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 30 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $9,218.96 $12,205.94 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $12,135.04 $12,135.04 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $12,135.04 $12,135.04 Total Revenue Available $21,354.00 $24,340.98 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($493.10) ($493.10) Interfund Exp $0.00 ($0.60) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($3,736.19) ($4,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($1,614.51) ($5,000.00) Grounds Maintenance - Special Request ($354.29) $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($222.48) ($221.86) Professional Services (County Staff) ($2,587.49) ($3,000.00) Reimbursements - Gov/Gov (County Staff) $0.00 $0.00 Playground Inspection ($140.00) ($500.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($9,148.06) ($13,215.56) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $5,057.90 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $6,067.52 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $11,125.42 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $12,205.94 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Beginning Spring 2018 schedule $15,000 annual park clean-up. Utilize CSA M-16 funds to park improvement projects. Staff will review option for potential projects in 2019. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_37 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 38 / Fund 2854 (RODEO - RODEO AREA) Maximum Assessment is $32.04 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments Subzone A @ $32.04 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments Subzone B @ $27.24 / EDU EDU's for Subzone A 1,694.61 EDUs EDU's for Subzone B 1,121.00 EDUs 2,565 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 30 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 ($7,845.46) ($6,238.40) Revenues: Taxes and assessments $84,526.96 $84,831.34 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Reimbursements - Gov/Gov $55,000.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $139,526.96 $84,831.34 Total Revenue Available $131,681.50 $78,592.94 Expenditures: Office Expense ($40.00) ($40.00) Trash Service ($2,732.26) ($2,800.00) Communications ($536.08) ($537.00) Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($2,427.16) ($2,427.16) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($25,796.75) ($18,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) ($16,973.12) $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($75,880.34) ($32,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($1,549.72) ($1,545.37) Professional Services (County Staff) ($2,434.71) ($2,081.41) DoIT Phone Exchange ($386.04) ($400.00) Building Occupancy Cost ($9,163.72) ($18,262.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 ($500.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($137,919.90) ($78,592.94) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $0.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $0.00 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year ($6,238.40) $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Services have been adjusted to accommodate the exhausted budget. There is planned savings annually through 2033 to eliminate the negative balance and generate a reserve for park, trail and landscape improvements. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_38 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 42 / Fund 2867 (CALIFORNIA SKYLINE - BAY POINT AREA) Maximum assessment is: $210.00 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $210.00 / EDU 343.00 EDUs 343 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 30 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $23,629.88 $43,824.40 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $72,030.00 $72,030.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Reimbursements - Gov/Gov $7,000.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $79,030.00 $72,030.00 Total Revenue Available $102,659.88 $115,854.40 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($541.55) ($541.55) Interfund Exp ($3.00) ($3.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($14,493.38) ($16,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) ($6,240.00) ($4,500.00) Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($27,822.33) ($37,200.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($1,320.60) ($1,316.89) Professional Services (County Staff) ($952.62) ($5,000.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Boeger Park Maintenance* ($4,550.00) ($4,550.00) Tradewinds Park Maintenance* ($2,912.00)($2,912.00) Total Expenditures ($58,835.48) ($72,023.44) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $7,815.96 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $36,015.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $43,830.96 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $43,824.40 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Building fund to support future improvements for irrigation, medians, and frontage projects. *Please Note: Per the June 26, 2012 JEPA between Contra Costa County and Ambrose Recreation & Park District, Ambrose Recreation & Park District is responsible for Boeger and Tradewinds Park. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_42 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 45 / Fund 2869 (ALAMO VILLAS - ALAMO AREA) Maximum assessment is: $120.00 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $120.00 / EDU 10.00 EDUs 10 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 30 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 ($2,258.80) ($3,294.58) Revenues: Taxes and assessments $1,200.00 $1,200.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $1,200.00 $1,200.00 Total Revenue Available ($1,058.80) ($2,094.58) Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($258.50) ($258.50) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) ($1,705.28) $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) (250.00) ($550.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($22.00) ($21.94) Professional Services (County Staff) $0.00 ($100.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($2,235.78) ($930.44) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $0.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $0.00 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year ($3,294.58) ($3,025.02) Maintenance Strategy: Build Operating and Project Reserves over time. Schedule median refreshment every five (5) years beginning in 2023. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_45 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 48 / Fund 2872 (OAKGATE DRIVE - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum assessment is: $490.00 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $490.00 / EDU 72.00 EDUs 72 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 31 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $25,336.42 $24,636.91 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $35,280.00 $35,280.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $35,280.00 $35,280.00 Total Revenue Available $60,616.42 $59,916.91 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($311.20) ($311.20) Interfund Exp $0.00 ($2.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($7,266.41) ($7,400.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($24,872.07) ($26,537.92) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) $0.00 ($646.83) Professional Services (County Staff) ($3,529.83) ($3,500.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($35,979.51) ($38,397.95) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $3,878.96 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $17,640.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $21,518.96 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $24,636.91 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Evaluate, trim and replace trees (as needed) commencing in 2018 and every five (5) years thereafter. An irrigation assessment will also be conducted concurrently. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_48 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 54 / Fund 2876 (ALAMO COUNTRY - ALAMO AREA) Maximum assessment is: $414.52 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $414.52 / EDU 93.00 EDUs 93 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page31 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $36,075.90 $42,691.17 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $37,237.20 $38,550.36 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $37,237.20 $38,550.36 Total Revenue Available $73,313.10 $81,241.53 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($329.05) ($329.05) Interfund Exp ($874.48) ($874.48) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($4,760.11) ($6,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($20,206.83) ($25,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($682.71) ($704.62) Professional Services (County Staff) ($3,768.75) ($4,000.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($30,621.93) ($36,908.15) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $25,058.20 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $19,275.18 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $44,333.38 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $42,691.17 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-02 193.20 $275.00 Feb-14 248.62 2.45% $353.86 Feb-15 254.91 2.53% $362.82 Feb-16 262.60 3.02% $373.77 Feb-17 271.63 3.44% $386.62 Feb-18 281.31 3.56% $400.40 Feb-19 291.23 3.53% $414.52 Maintenance Strategy: Annually, evaluate, trim, replace/remove trees and shrubs. Refresh mulch biannually beginning 2018. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_54 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 57 / Fund 2877 (PACIFIC WATERWAYS - DISCOVERY BAY AREA) Maximum assessment is: $231.00 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $231.00 / EDU 379.00 EDUs 379 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 31 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $17,765.32 $22,842.19 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $87,549.00 $87,549.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $87,549.00 $87,549.00 Total Revenue Available $105,314.32 $110,391.19 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($572.24) ($572.24) Interfund Exp $0.00 $0.00 Communications $0.00 $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($17,440.70) ($17,400.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Vehicle Expense ($16,735.00) ($20,000.00) Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) ($6,894.96) ($7,000.00) Grounds Maintenance - (in house) $0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($35,951.26) ($35,000.00) Professional Services (County Staff) ($4,877.97) ($5,000.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($82,472.13) ($84,972.24) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $25,418.95 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $25,418.95 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $22,842.19 $0.00 *Maintenance Strategy: Build the fund balance for future improvements. At approximated $7,000 annual savings, it is estimated that the operating reserve will be established in 2025. At that time, select projects can be planned to support the zone. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_57 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 61 / Fund 2833 (DISCOVERY BAY WEST - DISCOVERY BAY AREA) Maximum Assessment is FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ Method of apportionment located on page 32 Annual Revenue Total Revenue Available Subdivision Total Units Current Assessable Units Revenue Total Units Current Assessable Units Village 1 (7686) 57 57.00 $9,120.00 97 97.00 Village 1 (12 unit remainder, Parcel I)1 6.00 $960.00 88 88.00 Village 1 (Misc - RV parking) 1 1.27 $203.52 110 110.00 Village 1 (8143) 77 77.00 $12,320.00 47 47.00 Village 1 (8166) 58 58.00 $9,280.00 92 92.00 Village 1 (8167) 71 71.00 $11,360.00 131 131.00 Village 2 (8023) 99 99.00 $15,840.00 137 137.00 Village 2 (8428) 80 80.00 $12,800.00 12 12.00 Village 2 (8429) 77 77.00 $12,320.00 17 8.50 Village 2 (8430) 44 44.00 $7,040.00 131 131.00 Village 2 (8431) 50 50.00 $8,000.00 38 19.00 Village 2 (8432) 55 55.00 $8,800.00 107 107.00 Village 2 (8433) 49 49.00 $7,840.00 47 23.50 Village 2 Senior Apartments 0.00 $0.00 0 0.00 Village 3 (8570) 72 72.00 $11,520.00 80 80.00 1,925 1,879.27 Other Special Departmental Vehicle Expense Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) Grounds Maintenance - (in house) Office Expense Publications & Legal Notices Interest on Notes & Warrants Tax & Assessment Fees Interfund Exp Communications Professional Services (Non-County Staff) Maintenance Strategy: Coordinate with Discovery Bay for maintenance needs of recent improvements and build operation Capital Improvements Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) Balance Forward to Ensuing Year Total Capital Improvement and Reserves ($228,584.14) $0.00 ($21,180.81) ($80,879.72) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Total Expenditures Professional Services (County Staff) Vandalism/Incidentals Utilities - Water & Electricity ($46,512.66) Earnings on Investment Fund Balance as of June 30 Revenues: Taxes and assessments Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov Expenditures: ($1,654.17) $513,497.51 $0.00 $284,913.37 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ($1,885.40) ($26.00) $0.00 $0.00 ($82,009.00) ($36,000.00) ($5,000.00) ($251,120.40) 300,683.52 $12,800.00 $0.00 $3,760.00 $17,120.00 $3,040.00 $20,960.00 $1,360.00 $1,920.00 $21,920.00 $20,960.00 $14,720.00 $7,520.00 $17,600.00 $14,080.00 $15,520.00 Revenue $0.00 1,925 Parcels 1,879.27 EDUs $160.00 / EDU $190.00 / EDU $0.00 ($18,126.98) ($58,318.40) $0.00 ($26.00) ($1,885.40) $0.00 $0.00 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections $280,922.10 $2,597.10 $0.00 $278,325.00 $232,575.41 Subdivision $0.00 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections $284,913.37 $300,683.20 $0.00 $0.00 $300,683.20 $585,596.57 $0.00 $184,134.57 $150,341.60 $334,476.17 ($47,200.00) $0.00 ($60,000.00) ($19,000.00) Total Village 3 (8579) Village 3 (8578) Village 3 (8577) - SFR Village 3 (8572) Village 3 (8571) Village 5 (8992) - SFR Village 5 (8992) - VSFR Village 5 (8828) - SFR Village 4 (8827) - SFR Village 4 (8580) -SFR Village 5 (9322) - SFR Village 5 (9067) -SFR Village 5 (9067) - VSFR Village 5 (8993) -SFR Village 5 (8993) - VSFR LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_61 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 63 / Fund 2815 (PARKWAY ESTATES - NORTH RICHMOND AREA) Maximum assessment is: $230.00 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $230.00 / EDU 87.00 EDUs 87 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 32 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $59,169.82 $60,561.23 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $20,010.00 $20,010.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $20,010.00 $20,010.00 Total Revenue Available $79,179.82 $80,571.23 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($323.95) ($323.95) Interfund Exp ($2.00) $0.00 Utilities - Water & Electricity ($1,391.75) ($1,600.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($14,059.77) ($15,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($366.86) ($365.83) Professional Services (County Staff) ($1,474.26) ($1,500.00) Playground Inspection $0.00 $0.00 Vandalism/Incidentals ($1,000.00)$0.00 Total Expenditures ($18,618.59) ($18,789.78) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $51,776.45 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $10,005.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $61,781.45 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $60,561.23 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Playground and irrigation inspection. Schedule landscape refresh in 2023 and every five (5) years after. Refreshment should not exceed $10,000. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_63 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 64 / Fund 2864 (CALIFORNIA REFLECTIONS - PINOLE AREA) Maximum assessment is: $300.00 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $250.00 / EDU 31.00 EDUs 31 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 32 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $60,460.70 $62,177.47 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $7,750.00 $7,750.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $811.60 $0.00 Annual Revenue $8,561.60 $7,750.00 Total Revenue Available $69,022.30 $69,927.47 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($276.35) ($277.00) Interfund Exp ($7.00) ($7.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($789.21) ($1,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($4,693.10) ($5,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($142.09) ($141.69) Professional Services (County Staff) ($937.08) ($1,000.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($6,844.83) ($7,425.69) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $58,626.78 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $3,875.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $62,501.78 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $62,177.47 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Irrigation inspection and repairs. Staff will facilitate a refresh of plantings and mulch not to exceed $15,000 in 2018. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_64 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 68 / Fund 2882 (WENDT RANCH - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum assessment is: $300.00 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $5.00 / EDU 125.00 EDUs 125 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 32 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $11,923.44 $11,976.73 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $625.00 $625.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $625.00 $625.00 Total Revenue Available $12,548.44 $12,601.73 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($356.25) ($356.25) Interfund Exp ($4.00) ($4.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) $0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($11.46) ($11.43) Professional Services (County Staff) ($200.00) ($200.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($571.71) ($571.68) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $11,717.55 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $312.50 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $12,030.05 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $11,976.73 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Maintained by HOA. Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior sections of this Zone which are planned to be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of LL-2. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_68 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 69 / Fund 2871 (ALAMO CREEK - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum assessment is: $1,480.73 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $5.00 / EDU 841.82 EDUs 810 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 33 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $52,986.60 $55,294.88 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $4,026.60 $4,209.10 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $4,026.60 $4,209.10 Total Revenue Available $57,013.20 $59,503.98 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($938.50) ($938.50) Interfund Exp ($6.00) ($6.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) $0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($73.82) ($72.20) Professional Services (County Staff) ($700.00) ($700.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($1,718.32) ($1,716.70) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $55,682.73 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $2,104.55 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $57,787.28 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $55,294.88 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-06 209.10 $1,063.16 Feb-14 248.62 2.45% $1,264.07 Feb-15 254.91 2.53% $1,296.08 Feb-16 262.60 3.02% $1,335.18 Feb-17 271.63 3.44% $1,381.07 Feb-18 281.31 3.56% $1,430.30 Feb-19 291.23 3.53% $1,480.73 Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior sections of this Zone, which are currently owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association. However, the maximum assessment rate, when established, included these interior sections as being maintained and operated by LL-2. Therefore if the Homeowner’s Association fails to maintain these interior sections to County standards, the County may take over maintenance of these areas and increase the assessment to it’s maximum allowable rate. Maintenance Strategy: Maintained by HOA - maintain reserve in the event that the HOA is not able to sustain the maintenance needed. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_69 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 70 / Fund 2885 (INTERVENING PROPERTIES - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum assessment is: $455.97 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $200.00 / EDU 426.00 EDUs 379 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 33 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $72,071.36 $86,142.75 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $74,550.00 $85,200.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $74,550.00 $85,200.00 Total Revenue Available $146,621.36 $171,342.75 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($572.15) ($572.15) Interfund Exp ($21.00) ($21.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($11,221.09) ($25,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($40,181.81) ($50,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($1,366.80) ($1,362.96) Professional Services (County Staff) ($7,115.76) ($7,000.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($60,478.61) ($83,956.11) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $44,786.64 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $42,600.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $87,386.64 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $86,142.75 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-05 201.20 $315.00 Feb-14 248.62 2.45% $389.25 Feb-15 254.91 2.53% $399.11 Feb-16 262.60 3.02% $411.15 Feb-17 271.63 3.44% $425.28 Feb-18 281.31 3.56% $440.44 Feb-19 291.23 3.53% $455.97 Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior sections of this Zone which are planned to be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of LL-2. Maintenance Strategy: Beginning in 2020 and every two (2) years evaluate, trim and replace trees. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_70 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 71 / Fund 2886 (DIABLO VISTA BALLFIELDS - DANVILLE AREA) Maximum assessment is: $115.80 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $115.80 / EDU 1,095.00 EDUs 1,059 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 34 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $5,399.10 $5,361.51 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $121,758.62 $126,801.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $121,758.62 $126,801.00 Total Revenue Available $127,157.72 $132,162.51 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($1,150.15) ($1,150.15) Interfund Exp ($1.00) ($1.00) Contribution to SRVUSD ($116,202.64) ($119,600.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) $0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($2,232.33) ($2,303.97) Professional Services (County Staff) ($2,210.09) ($3,000.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures ($121,796.21) ($126,055.12) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $6,107.39 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $6,107.39 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $5,361.51 $0.00 CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-05 201.20 $80.00 Feb-14 248.62 2.45% $98.86 Feb-15 254.91 2.53% $101.36 Feb-16 262.60 3.02% $104.42 Feb-17 271.63 3.44% $108.01 Feb-18 281.31 3.56% $111.86 Feb-19 291.23 3.53% $115.80 Please Note: Per the December 15, 2009 Joint Exercise Powers Agreement between the Town of Danville, San Ramon Valley Unified School District (SRVUSD) and Contra Costa County, SRVUSD is responsible for the maintenance of this area. Per the January 27, 2004 Settlement Agreement, all revenue (with the exception of Administration Costs) will be transferred to the entity responsible for the actual maintenance of the Ballfields. Maintenance Strategy: Maintained by San Ramon Unified School District. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_71 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 74 / Fund 2875 (BELLA FLORA - NORTH RICHMOND AREA) Maximum assessment is:$766.04 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $340.00 / EDU 178.00 EDUs 176 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page34 and 35 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $252,478.92 $260,140.10 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $60,520.00 $60,520.00 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $2,434.78 $0.00 Annual Revenue $62,954.78 $60,520.00 Total Revenue Available $315,433.70 $320,660.10 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($399.60) ($399.60) Interfund Exp ($28.00) ($28.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity ($6,972.99) ($7,000.00) Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) ($33,475.06) ($35,000.00) Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($1,109.58) ($1,106.46) Professional Services (County Staff) ($10,258.37) ($11,000.00) Playground Inspection ($400.00) ($400.00) Vandalism/Incidentals ($2,650.00)($2,650.00) Total Expenditures ($55,293.60) ($57,584.06) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $232,816.04 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $30,260.00 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves $0.00 $263,076.04 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $260,140.10 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Turf, playground and irrigation inspections Martin Drive, landscape improvements. Improvement project along Martin Drive completed in 2018. CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-06 209.10 $550.00 Feb-14 248.62 2.45% $653.95 Feb-15 254.91 2.53% $670.51 Feb-16 262.60 3.02% $690.74 Feb-17 271.63 3.44% $714.48 Feb-18 281.31 3.56% $739.95 Feb-19 291.23 3.53% $766.04 Land Use Type No. of Parcels EDU Rate FY19-20 No. of EDU's SFR - Sub 9293 (old 8938) 95 1.00 5.00 Townhomes - Sub 9293 (old 8938) 120 0.75 0.00 Condominiums - Sub 9293 (old 8938) 140 0.75 0.00 SFR - Sub 8755 173 1.00 173.00 528 178.00 Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior of Subdivision 8938 which are planned to be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of LL-2. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_74 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX A Special Districts Budget Worksheet Entity: LL2 Zone 75 / Fund 2889 (BELMONT TERRACE - PACHECO AREA) Maximum assessment is: $353.90 / EDU FY 2019-20 -Assessments @ $5.00 / EDU 164.75 EDUs 219 Parcels Method of apportionment located on page 35 FY 2018-19 6 month actuals/ 6 month projections FY 2019-20 Proposed Budget Fund Balance as of June 30 $7,815.74 $7,985.11 Revenues: Taxes and assessments $821.58 $821.58 Interfund Rev. Gov/Gov $0.00 $0.00 Earnings on Investment $0.00 $0.00 Annual Revenue $821.58 $821.58 Total Revenue Available $8,637.32 $8,806.69 Expenditures: Office Expense $0.00 $0.00 Publications & Legal Notices $0.00 $0.00 Interest on Notes & Warrants $0.00 $0.00 Tax & Assessment Fees ($436.15) ($436.15) Interfund Exp ($1.00) ($1.00) Utilities - Water & Electricity $0.00 $0.00 Other Special Departmental $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (out of house, contractor) $0.00 $0.00 Grounds Maintenance - (in house) $0.00 $0.00 Professional Services (Non-County Staff) ($15.06) ($15.02) Professional Services (County Staff) ($200.00) ($200.00) Vandalism/Incidentals $0.00 $0.00 Total Expenditures: ($652.21) ($652.17) Capital Improvement Projects and Reserves: Capital Improvements $0.00 $7,743.73 Operating Reserves (up to 50% of Revenue) $0.00 $410.79 Total Capital Improvement and Reserves: $0.00 $8,154.52 Balance Forward to Ensuing Year $7,985.11 $0.00 Maintenance Strategy: Maintained by HOA CPI Info. Date Actual CPI Increase Rate Jun-06 209.10 $254.11 Feb-14 248.62 2.45% $302.12 Feb-15 254.91 2.53% $309.77 Feb-16 262.60 3.02% $319.11 Feb-17 271.63 3.44% $330.08 Feb-18 281.31 3.56% $341.85 Feb-19 291.23 3.53% $353.90 Subdivision-Landuse Total Units EDU Rate FY19-20 No. of EDU's 8984 Lots - Courtyard 128 0.75 96.00 8967 Lots - Courtyard 89 0.75 66.75 SFR/Commercial 2 1.00 2.00 219 164.75 Please Note: There are parks and landscaping located in the interior of Subdivisions 8967 and 8984 which are planned to be owned and maintained by a Homeowners Association and therefore the maximum assessment rate did not include these areas of maintenance and they are not the responsibility of LL-2. LL2 apxA_19-20 budgets_final - Z_75 A - 1 Francisco & Associates Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) FY 2019-20 APPENDIX B ccc1920_FER Francisco & Associates, Inc. APPENDIX B ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS 5533 53 80 5695 5534 5696 (old 6622)MS11-84 5354 LYNBROOKPARK ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone1,2,&4.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 400 0 400 800200 Fe et 1 2 3 4 5 Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zones 1, 2 and 4Lynbrook Development - Bay Point(Zone description on page 6) LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 5573 HIC KORYMEADOWSPARK ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone3.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 150 0 150 30075 Feet 1 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 3Hickory Meadow s - Bay Point(Zone description on page 6) LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone5.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 860 0 860 1,720430 Feet 1 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 5Pacheco Beautification - Pacheco Area(Zone description on page 6) 2 1 Creek LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone7.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 390 0 390 780195 Feet FOXCREEKPARK 2 1 PedestrianBridge PedestrianBridge Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 7Pleasant H ill BA RT - Contra Costa Centre Area(Zone description on page 6) LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 6484 ± 190 0 190 38095 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 10Viewpointe - Bay Point Area(Zone description on page 7) VIEWPOINTEPARK 5 2 4 3 1 N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone10.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) LUP 2042-85 ± 140 0 140 28070 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 1 1Hilltop Commons - San Pablo Area(Zone description on page 7) N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone11.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 1 2 7279 7040 7041 ± 570 0 570 1,140285 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 1 7Shadow C reek - Danville Area(Zone description on page 7) N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone17.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 1 6958 ± 60 0 60 12030 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 18Pacheco M anor - Pacheco Area(Zone description on page 7) N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone18.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 1 2 DONEGAL WAY SUNRISE RIDGE DR HIDDEN POND RDC A LLE V E R D E SILVERHILL WAYPEBBLE BEACH LOOP SILVERHILL CT R E L I E Z V A L L E Y R D H I D D E N P O N D C T N O R T H P O N D C T OAK VISTA CT 7821 7151 6769 7144 7820 2 ± 400 0 400 800200 Feet Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 1 9Hidden P ond – R eliez V alle y/Martinez Area(Zone description on page 7) N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone19.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 1 LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 ± 1,000 0 1,000 2,000500 Feet Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 2 1Kensington - Kensington Area(Zone description on page 7) N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone21.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 3 2 1 4 LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks ± 8830 7152 (Zone description on page 8) Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 2 2Seabreeze – Bay Point Area 2 4 6 Fence 5 1 3 Parcel A 240 0 240 480120 FeetN:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone22.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 MANSFIELD DRSUGAR MAPLE DR JASMINE WYRASSANI DRSILVER M APLE DRCONEJO DRCHESIRE CIR CENTER WAY N OT T I N GH A M D R F L E E T W O O D R D RED MAPLE DR YORKSHIRE PL BOURNE L NF R E E SIA C TCHESHIRE CTTENBY TER GRIMSBY LNWESTMINSTER PL SHEFFIELD CIRB U C KIN G H A M PL CENTER CT TROWBRIDGE WAY COVENTRY PL BLACKHAWK PLAZA CIR C H E S T E R F I E L D L N SN O W D O N PLC H AT H A MTER TRENT CT "B" ST M A N SFIELD D R MARIGOLD ST JONATHAN RIDGE DRHASKINS RANCH CIRNOTTINGHAM PLL A K E F I E L D C T MALLARD STJA S M IN E C TNORFOLK PLWALES CT SWAN ST F A L C O N S T PELICAN ST STARLING STBUCKINGHAM DRDAISY CT PHOENIX ST PORTOLA DR CAMINO TASSAJARA 7278 7277 7188 7763 7280 1 BenefitZone 27 BenefitZone 27A * Improvements include landscape between the sidewalk and the curb on Camino Tassajara & medians - slopes are HOA maintained 1 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 2 7Bettencourt Ranch and Somerset– Danville Area(Zone description on page 8) ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone27.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 560 0 560 1,120280 Feet 2 LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 BIXLER RDREGATTA DRIVE FOGHORN WAY NEWPORT CTPIER POINTMARSH CREEK RD CAPSTAN PLPORTHOLE DRYACHT CTCATAMARAN CT HALYARD WAYNEWPORT PL SSHELL PLVAL LEY OAK D R BIXLER RDMS39-91 8456 DP3031-94 ± 2 1 PedestrianBridge U.S.POSTOFFICE PedestrianBridge Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 35Sandy Cove Shoppi ng Center – Discovery B ay A rea(Zone description on page 8) N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone35.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 400 0 400 800200 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 AN GE L A AV E HI GH EAGLE RDSTONE VALLEY WAYPEBBLE CTABI NGT ON L NMEGAN CT ST PAUL DRNELDA WAYMI R A N D A A V E STONE VALLEY RD Page 1 of 2 STONE VALLEY RD RAY CTH O P E L NGREEN VALLEY RD600 0 600 1,200300Feet 300 0 300 600150Feet 2(see page 2)3 1 3 ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone36.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 36Alamo Beautification - Alamo Area(Zone description on page 8) LEGEND Indica tes Mai ntenance Area fromPart A in Enginee r's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 1 CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE Page 2 of 2 3(see page 1) 2 1(see page 1) 2,000 0 2,000 4,0001,000 Feet Danville Boulevard Ston e Valley Roa d ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone36.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 36Alamo Beautifi cation - A lamo Area(Zone description on page 8) LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 2 MARIEPOTTERPARK BIGOAKTREEPARK CLYDEPARK MAYBECKPARK 4 1 3 ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone37.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 500 0 500 1,000250 Fe et Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 37Clyde - Clyde Area(Zone description on page 9) LEGEND Indica tes Mai ntenance Area fromPart A in Enginee r's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks 1 3 BenefitSubzone "A" BenefitSubzone "B" S A N P A B L O B A Y LEFTYGOMEZBALLFIELD RODEOGATEWAY2 4 Page 1 of 2 RODEOCREEKTRAIL Creek ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone38.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 1,000 0 1,000 2,000500 Fe et Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 38Rodeo - Rodeo Area(Zone description on page 9) LEGEND Indica tes Mai ntenance Area fromPart A in Enginee r's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks SA N PA B LO A VE7 T H S T F O U R T H S T C A LIF O R N I A S T C A LIF O R N I A S T WI LLOW AVEHAWTHORNE DRCONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 1 BenefitSubzone "B" LEFTYGOMEZBALLFIELD RODEOGATEWAY 2 4 5 Page 2 of 2 Creek PedestrianBridge RODEOCREEKTRAIL ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone38.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 800 0 800 1,600400 Fe et Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 38Rodeo - Rodeo Area(Zone description on page 9) LEGEND Indica tes Mai ntenance Area fromPart A in Enginee r's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks BenefitSubzone "A" C A LIF O R N I A S T 7 T H S T HAWTHORNE DRW IL L O W A V E VIEWPOINTBLVDCORAL DRWINDWARD DRSAN PABLO AVESEE PREVIOUS PAGE 7737 7838 7597 2 BOEGERPARK 4 1 3 TRADEWINDSPARK 5 ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone42.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 500 0 500 1,000250 Fe et Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 42California Skyline - B ay Point Area(Zone description on page 9) LEGEND Indica tes Mai ntenance Area fromPart A in Enginee r's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 D A N VIL L E B L V DSOUTH AVEIro n H orse Trail 7041 1 ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone45.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 80 0 80 16040 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 (Zone description on page 9) Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 45Alamo Villas – Alamo Area HANSEN LNMRACK RDCHESHIRE CTOAKGATE DRC H A T H A MTER S H A D O W C R E E K C T CAMINO TASSAJARA HANSEN LNDP03-3009 8104 7779 7613 7621 7780 7778 7777 7776 2 ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone48.pdf (Last Update 05-15-2019 SA) 200 0 200 400100 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 (Zone description on page 10) Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 48Oakgate Drive – Danville Area 1 LIVORNA RD LAVENDER DRVELVET WAYLIVORNA HEIGHTS RDFOX CIR ELLIOTT CTMIRANDA LNALAMO COUNTRY CIRTULANE DR ALAMO LNMIRANDA PLPASEO DE SOLJAMES BOWIE CTFALCON VIEW CTMIRANDA AVE PEBBLEBROOK CT OSHER CT CRIMSON CT TURNER CTN E E L Y C T E N S L E YCT 7601 7818 1 1 1 ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone54.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 400 0 400 800200 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 (Zone description on page 10) Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 54Alamo Country – Alamo Area 7679 7907 7908 7909 7881 2 1 3 4 5 5 5 6 REGATTA PARK(AKA TYLER M EMO RI AL PARK) 2 U.S.POSTOFFICE ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone57.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 310 0 310 620155 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 57Pacific W aterways – Discovery Bay Area(Zone description on page 10) Page 1 of 3 VILLAGE V VILLAGE III VILLAGE II VILLAGE I VILLAGE IV Page 3 Page 2 Cou nty ma in tained la ndscape are as are all on the e ast side of Bixler Road. There are int erm ittent p ocke ts at entrywa ys which are mainta ined by other services (HOAs).Point of Timber Road is b etwe en Village s I and II (north frontage Village I and south fron tage Villag e II). The entrywa y to The Lakes d evelopm ent is maintained by other se rvices (HOAs). * ** 7686 8166 8167 8143 NEWPORT DRABERDEEN LNCAMBRIDGE LNNEWBURY LNHAMPSHIRE DRSLIFER DRCARDINAL LNAMESBURY STPRESTON DRBERKSHIRE CTFAREHAM CTPOINT OF TIMBER RD BIXLER RDS T I R L I N G C T S U S S E X C T HASTINGS DR CAMBRIDGE CT HALF MOON CTCUMMINGS LN FROST WYBRONTE DREMERSON CTWILDE DRGULLEN DRCOLERIDGE WYPOE DRWILDE DRWILDE DRKEATS CTSLIFER PARK PARK&RIDE LOT VILLAGE I 1 4 5 2 *** 6 3 ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone61.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 500 0 500 1,000250Fe et Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 61Discovery Bay West – Discovery Bay Area(Zone description on page 10) LEGEND Indica tes Mai ntenance Area fromPart A in Enginee r's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Park & Ride Lots CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE 8166 8023 8429 8432 8433 8431 8430 8428BIXLER RDHAMPSHIRE DRPOINT OF TIMBER RD LAKESHORE CIR CRESCENT WAY YOSEMITE WAY WINCHESTER LOOP BRIDGEPORT LOOP SUPERIOR WAYMENDOCINO WAYCUMBERLAND WAYCASTLEROCK LOOP LOOKOUT POINT LOOP KEYSTONE LOOP OTTER BROOK LOOP HALF MOON CTTOPAZ CTLAKESHORE CIRPOE DRVILLAGE V VILLAGE III VILLAGE II VILLAGE I VILLAGE IV 6 Page 3 Page 1 VILLAGE II 3 ** * Page 2 of 3 ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone61.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 500 0 500 1,000250 Fe et Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 61Discovery Bay West – Discovery Bay Area(Zone description on page 10) LEGEND Indica tes Mai ntenance Area fromPart A in Enginee r's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Park & Ride Lots Cou nty ma in tained la ndscape are as are all on the e ast side of Bixler Road. There are int erm ittent p ocke ts at entrywa ys which are mainta ined by other services (HOAs).Point of Timber Road is b etwe en Village s I and II (north frontage Village I and south fron tage Villag e II). The entrywa y to The Lakes d evelopm ent is maintained by other se rvices (HOAs). * ** CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE Page 3 of 3 VILLAGE V VILLAGE III VILLAGE II VILLAGE I VILLAGE IV Page 1 County maintained landscape areas are all on the east side of Bixler Road.There are intermittent pockets at entryways which are maintained by other services (HOAs). * Page 2 8572 8571 8570 8580 8827 9322 8993 8992 8577 8578 8579 9067 8828 8828 BIXLER RDLAKEFRONT LOOP AR C A D IA C I R GO LD C R EEK C IR FERN RIDGE CIR A L M A N OR D R O R O V IL L E C T LA K E F R O N T L O O P SENECA CIR CRYSTAL SPRINGS CIR GREEN CASTLE CIR YELLOWSTONE CIR NEW MELONES CIR SHEARWATER CIRLAKEHEAD WAYKEYESPORT WAYBAY HARBOR WAYN LAKEFRONT LOOPTIDEWATER WAYFREEPORT CTDAVENPORT CIRPESCADERO CIRHARBOR HAVEN W AYBOCA RATON WAYMONTICELLO WAYMYSTIC CTOUTRIGGER WAYPYRAMID WAYKEY W WAYWESTPORT CIR BROOKHAVEN CIR PINEHALLOW CIR LIVINGSTON CT MERRITT CT PARDEE CTRAINBOW CTNATOMA CT* 6 VILLAGE V VILLAGE III VILLAGE IV ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone61.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 1,000 0 1,000 2,000500Feet Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 61Discovery Bay West – Discovery Bay Area(Zone description on page 10) LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Park & Ride Lots 79031 PARKWAYESTATESPARK ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone63.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 100 0 100 20050 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 63Parkway Estates - North Richmond Area(Zone description on page 11) D U B L IN D R DUBLIN DRO C O N N E R D R O R O U R K E D R E I R E D R SAN PABLO AVEO C O N N O R D R 7661 1 2 ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone64.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 100 0 100 20050 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 6 4California R efle ctions – P inole A rea(Zone description on page 11) 8847 8002 8698 8002 C H A R B R A Y S T LUSITANO STMARTINGALE CTGRIFFON STWELSHLAND STGRIFFON STM A S S A R A S T C A S A B L A N C A S T MADELINE LNVA N E S S A WAY PROVENCE RD M O N T E A L B E R S WAYBLUE SPUR CIRM A N T O V A S T MENTON STMONTEROSSO STC O L M A R S T GENOA STMARSANNE ST R I O J A S T CREEKVIEW PLC A S A B L A N C A S T MONTEROSSO STC A R M E N W A Y KNOLLS CREEK DRARIEL DRCAMINO TASSAJARA 2 DIABLO VISTASCHOOLBALLFIELDS ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone68.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 400 0 400 800200 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engi ne er's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 (Zone description on page 11) Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 6 8Wendt Ranch – Danville A rea(Zone description on page 11)1 C H A R B R A Y S T LUSITANO STMARTINGALE CTCASHMERE ST ANGORA CT GRIFFON STWELSHLAND STGRIFFON STM A S S A R A S T C A S A B L A N C A S T MADELINE LNVA N E S S A W AY CHARBRAY ST BENGALI STBELARUS STEVOLENE STBENGALI STM O N T E A L B E R S WAYBLUE SPUR CIRM A N T O V A S T MENTON STMONTEROSSO STC O L M A R S T GENOA STMARSANNE ST R I O J A S T CREEKVIEW PLC A S A B L A N C A S T MONTEROSSO STC A R M E N W A Y KNOLLS CREEK DRARIEL DRCAMINO TASSAJARA CAMINO TASSAJARA 9005 8381 8941 8982 9035 9037 9036 9315 9314 2 5 3 DIABLO VISTASCHOOLBALLFIELDS 4 ± N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone69.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 500 0 500 1,000250 Fe et LEGEND Indica tes Mai ntenance Area fromPart A in Enginee r's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 69Alamo Creek – Danville Area(Zone description on page 11)1 LAWRENCE RDC H A R B R A Y S T JASMINE WY MARTINGALE CTCULET LN GRIFFON STWELSHLAND STGRIFFON STM A S S A R A S T F R E E SI A C T C A S A B L A N C A S T MADELINE LNVAN ES SA WAY CULET DR PROVENCE RD CHES T E R F I E L D L N MON TE AL BE RS W AY MARIGOLD ST CAFE CTCREEKPOINT CT BLUE SPUR CIRM A N T O V A S T MENTON STMONTEROSSO STCULET RANCH RD C O L M A R S T GENOA STMARSANNE STJASMINE C TR I O J A S T CRYSTAL SPRINGS CT CREEKVIEW PLC A S A B L A N C A S T MONTEROSSO STC A R M E N W A Y KNOLLS CREEK DRARIEL DRDAISY CT CAMINO TASSAJARA CAMINO TASSAJARA HANSEN LN8331 2 4 1 5 3 N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone70.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 500 0 500 1,000250 Feet LEGEND Indicates Maintenance Area fromPart A in Engineer's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 70Intervening Properties – Danville A re a(Zone description on page 12) 8331 9005 8381 8941 8982 9035 9037 9036 9315 9314 9037LAWRENCE RDC H A R B R A Y S T LUSITANO STMARTINGALE CTCASHMERE ST ANGORA CT GRIFFON STMEADOW LAKE DR WELSHLAND STGRIFFON STM A S S A R A S T F R E E SIA C T CA S A B L A N C A S T MADELINE LNVAN E S S A WAY C H A R B R A Y S T CHARBRAY ST BENGALI STBELARUS STEVOLENE STBENGALI STPROVENCE RD MON T E A LB ER S WAY MARIGOLD ST CAFE CTBLUE SPUR CIRM A N T O V A S T MENTON STMONTEROSSO STCULET RANCH RD C O L M A R S T GENOA STMARSANNE ST R I O J A S T CRYSTAL SPRINGS CT CREEKVIEW PLC A S A B L A N C A S T MONTEROSSO STC A R M E N W A Y KNOLLS CREEK DRARIEL DRCAMINO TASSAJARA CAMINO TASSAJARA CAMINO TASSAJARAHANSEN LNDIABLO VISTASCHOOLBALLFIELDS 1 ± (Zone description on page 12) LEGEND Indica tes Mai ntenance Area fromPart A in Enginee r's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone71.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 700 0 700 1,400350 Fe et Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 71Diablo Vista Ballfields – Danville Area 8755 9293 3RD STMARKET AVE 1ST STSILVER AVE PITTSBURG AVE TRUMAN STGROVE AVEGARDEN TRACT RDDA VILLA N JADE STRUBY AVERICHMOND PKWYHARROLD STHENRY CLARK LUCY REID SPEARS MALCOLM DRELLISON LN W GROVE AVE W ARREN DRMARTIN DR2ND ST1ST ST2ND STSPEARSCIRCLE PARK 2 3 1 ± 400 0 400 800200 Fe et LEGEND Indica tes Mai ntenance Area fromPart A in Enginee r's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 74Bella Flora – Richmond Area(Zone description on page 12) N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone74.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) 89678984 S U N R I S E D RFALLING STAR DRLITTLE VALLEY RDPACHECO BLVDFALLING STAR DRHERON LNS U N R I S E D R BANBURY LOOP N O R W A L K C T 1 2 Church ofGod Assessment DiagramContra Costa County LL-2Zone 75Belmont Terrace – Pacheco Area(Zone description on page 13) ± 200 0 200 400100 Fe et LEGEND Indica tes Mai ntenance Area fromPart A in Enginee r's Reportte Frontage/Median Landscaping Open Space Trails Parks Subdivision Boundary and Number5534 N:\Contra\FY19-20\LL-2\Diagrams\Zone75.pdf (Last Update 04-04-2019 SA) Contra Costa County Countywide Landscaping District (LL-2) 2019-20 APPENDIX C ccc1920_FER Francisco & Associates, Inc. APPENDIX C FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 ASSESSMENT ROLL CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONES 1,2,4 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2830 MA LEVY CODE: Lynbrook-Bay Point Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-240-057 $76.16 098-240-060 $4,569.60 098-240-064 $3,674.72 098-381-001 $76.16 098-381-002 $76.16 098-381-003 $76.16 098-381-004 $76.16 098-381-005 $76.16 098-381-006 $76.16 098-381-007 $76.16 098-381-008 $76.16 098-381-009 $76.16 098-381-010 $76.16 098-381-011 $76.16 098-381-012 $76.16 098-381-013 $76.16 098-381-014 $76.16 098-381-015 $76.16 098-381-016 $76.16 098-381-017 $76.16 098-381-018 $76.16 098-381-019 $76.16 098-381-020 $76.16 098-381-021 $76.16 098-381-022 $76.16 098-381-023 $76.16 098-381-024 $76.16 098-381-025 $76.16 098-381-026 $76.16 098-381-027 $76.16 098-381-028 $76.16 098-381-029 $76.16 098-381-030 $76.16 098-381-031 $76.16 098-381-032 $76.16 098-381-033 $76.16 098-381-034 $76.16 098-382-001 $76.16 098-382-002 $76.16 098-382-003 $76.16 098-382-004 $76.16 098-382-005 $76.16 098-382-006 $76.16 098-382-007 $76.16 098-382-008 $76.16 098-382-009 $76.16 098-382-010 $76.16 098-382-011 $76.16 098-382-012 $76.16 098-382-013 $76.16 098-382-014 $76.16 098-382-015 $76.16 098-382-016 $76.16 098-382-017 $76.16 098-382-018 $76.16 098-382-019 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-382-020 $76.16 098-382-021 $76.16 098-382-022 $76.16 098-382-023 $76.16 098-382-024 $76.16 098-382-025 $76.16 098-382-026 $76.16 098-382-027 $76.16 098-382-028 $76.16 098-382-029 $76.16 098-382-030 $76.16 098-382-031 $76.16 098-382-032 $76.16 098-383-001 $76.16 098-383-002 $76.16 098-383-003 $76.16 098-383-004 $76.16 098-383-005 $76.16 098-383-006 $76.16 098-383-007 $76.16 098-383-008 $76.16 098-383-009 $76.16 098-383-010 $76.16 098-383-011 $76.16 098-383-012 $76.16 098-383-013 $76.16 098-383-014 $76.16 098-383-015 $76.16 098-383-016 $76.16 098-383-017 $76.16 098-383-018 $76.16 098-383-019 $76.16 098-383-020 $76.16 098-383-021 $76.16 098-383-022 $76.16 098-383-023 $76.16 098-383-024 $76.16 098-383-025 $76.16 098-383-026 $76.16 098-383-027 $76.16 098-383-028 $76.16 098-383-029 $76.16 098-383-030 $76.16 098-383-031 $76.16 098-383-032 $76.16 098-383-033 $76.16 098-383-034 $76.16 098-383-035 $76.16 098-383-036 $76.16 098-383-037 $76.16 098-383-038 $76.16 098-391-001 $76.16 098-391-002 $76.16 098-391-003 $76.16 098-391-004 $76.16 098-391-005 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-391-006 $76.16 098-391-007 $76.16 098-391-008 $76.16 098-391-009 $76.16 098-391-010 $76.16 098-391-011 $76.16 098-391-012 $76.16 098-391-013 $76.16 098-391-014 $76.16 098-391-015 $76.16 098-391-016 $76.16 098-391-017 $76.16 098-391-018 $76.16 098-391-019 $76.16 098-391-020 $76.16 098-391-021 $76.16 098-391-022 $76.16 098-392-001 $76.16 098-392-002 $76.16 098-392-003 $76.16 098-392-004 $76.16 098-392-005 $76.16 098-392-006 $76.16 098-392-007 $76.16 098-392-008 $76.16 098-392-009 $76.16 098-392-010 $76.16 098-392-011 $76.16 098-392-012 $76.16 098-392-013 $76.16 098-392-014 $76.16 098-392-015 $76.16 098-392-016 $76.16 098-392-017 $76.16 098-392-018 $76.16 098-392-019 $76.16 098-392-020 $76.16 098-392-021 $76.16 098-392-022 $76.16 098-392-023 $76.16 098-392-024 $76.16 098-392-025 $76.16 098-392-026 $76.16 098-392-027 $76.16 098-392-028 $76.16 098-392-029 $76.16 098-393-001 $76.16 098-393-002 $76.16 098-393-003 $76.16 098-393-004 $76.16 098-393-005 $76.16 098-393-006 $76.16 098-393-007 $76.16 098-393-008 $76.16 098-393-009 $76.16 098-393-010 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-393-011 $76.16 098-393-012 $76.16 098-393-013 $76.16 098-393-014 $76.16 098-393-015 $76.16 098-393-016 $76.16 098-393-017 $76.16 098-393-018 $76.16 098-393-019 $76.16 098-393-020 $76.16 098-393-021 $76.16 098-393-022 $76.16 098-393-023 $76.16 098-393-024 $76.16 098-393-025 $76.16 098-393-026 $76.16 098-393-027 $76.16 098-401-001 $76.16 098-401-002 $38.08 098-401-003 $38.08 098-401-004 $38.08 098-401-005 $38.08 098-401-006 $38.08 098-401-007 $38.08 098-401-008 $38.08 098-401-009 $38.08 098-401-010 $38.08 098-401-011 $38.08 098-401-012 $38.08 098-401-013 $38.08 098-401-014 $38.08 098-401-015 $38.08 098-401-016 $38.08 098-401-017 $38.08 098-401-018 $38.08 098-401-019 $38.08 098-401-020 $38.08 098-401-021 $38.08 098-401-022 $38.08 098-401-023 $38.08 098-401-024 $38.08 098-401-025 $38.08 098-401-026 $76.16 098-401-027 $38.08 098-401-028 $38.08 098-401-029 $38.08 098-401-030 $38.08 098-401-031 $38.08 098-401-032 $38.08 098-402-001 $38.08 098-402-002 $38.08 098-402-003 $38.08 098-402-004 $38.08 098-402-005 $76.16 098-402-006 $38.08 098-402-007 $38.08 1 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONES 1,2,4 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2830 MA LEVY CODE: Lynbrook-Bay Point Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-402-008 $38.08 098-402-009 $38.08 098-402-010 $38.08 098-402-011 $38.08 098-402-012 $38.08 098-402-013 $38.08 098-402-014 $38.08 098-402-015 $38.08 098-403-001 $76.16 098-403-002 $76.16 098-403-003 $76.16 098-403-004 $76.16 098-403-005 $76.16 098-404-001 $38.08 098-404-002 $38.08 098-404-003 $38.08 098-404-004 $38.08 098-404-005 $38.08 098-404-006 $38.08 098-404-007 $38.08 098-404-008 $38.08 098-404-009 $38.08 098-404-010 $38.08 098-404-011 $76.16 098-405-001 $38.08 098-405-002 $38.08 098-405-003 $38.08 098-405-004 $38.08 098-405-005 $38.08 098-405-006 $38.08 098-405-007 $38.08 098-405-008 $38.08 098-405-009 $38.08 098-405-010 $38.08 098-405-011 $38.08 098-405-012 $38.08 098-405-013 $38.08 098-405-014 $38.08 098-405-015 $38.08 098-405-016 $38.08 098-405-017 $38.08 098-405-018 $38.08 098-405-019 $38.08 098-405-020 $38.08 098-405-021 $38.08 098-405-022 $38.08 098-405-023 $76.16 098-405-024 $76.16 098-405-025 $38.08 098-405-026 $38.08 098-405-027 $38.08 098-405-028 $38.08 098-405-029 $38.08 098-405-030 $38.08 098-405-031 $38.08 098-405-032 $38.08 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-405-033 $38.08 098-405-034 $38.08 098-405-035 $38.08 098-405-036 $38.08 098-405-037 $38.08 098-405-038 $38.08 098-405-039 $38.08 098-405-040 $38.08 098-405-041 $38.08 098-405-042 $38.08 098-405-043 $38.08 098-405-044 $38.08 098-405-045 $38.08 098-405-046 $38.08 098-405-047 $38.08 098-405-048 $38.08 098-405-049 $38.08 098-405-050 $38.08 098-405-051 $38.08 098-405-052 $38.08 098-405-053 $38.08 098-405-054 $38.08 098-406-001 $76.16 098-406-002 $38.08 098-406-003 $38.08 098-406-004 $38.08 098-406-005 $38.08 098-406-006 $38.08 098-406-007 $38.08 098-406-008 $38.08 098-406-009 $38.08 098-406-010 $38.08 098-406-011 $38.08 098-406-012 $38.08 098-406-013 $38.08 098-406-014 $76.16 098-406-015 $76.16 098-406-016 $38.08 098-406-017 $38.08 098-406-018 $38.08 098-406-019 $38.08 098-406-020 $76.16 098-406-021 $76.16 098-406-022 $38.08 098-406-023 $38.08 098-406-024 $76.16 098-406-025 $38.08 098-406-026 $38.08 098-406-027 $38.08 098-406-028 $38.08 098-406-029 $38.08 098-406-030 $38.08 098-411-001 $76.16 098-411-002 $76.16 098-411-003 $76.16 098-411-004 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-411-005 $76.16 098-411-006 $76.16 098-411-007 $76.16 098-411-008 $76.16 098-411-009 $76.16 098-411-010 $76.16 098-411-011 $76.16 098-411-012 $76.16 098-411-013 $76.16 098-411-014 $76.16 098-411-015 $76.16 098-411-016 $76.16 098-411-017 $76.16 098-411-018 $76.16 098-411-019 $76.16 098-411-020 $76.16 098-412-001 $76.16 098-412-002 $76.16 098-412-003 $76.16 098-412-004 $76.16 098-412-005 $76.16 098-412-006 $76.16 098-412-007 $76.16 098-412-008 $76.16 098-412-009 $76.16 098-412-010 $76.16 098-412-011 $76.16 098-412-012 $76.16 098-412-013 $76.16 098-412-014 $76.16 098-412-015 $76.16 098-412-016 $76.16 098-412-017 $76.16 098-412-018 $76.16 098-412-019 $76.16 098-412-020 $76.16 098-412-021 $76.16 098-412-022 $76.16 098-412-023 $76.16 098-412-024 $76.16 098-412-025 $76.16 098-412-026 $76.16 098-412-027 $76.16 098-412-028 $76.16 098-412-029 $76.16 098-413-001 $76.16 098-413-002 $76.16 098-413-003 $76.16 098-413-004 $76.16 098-413-005 $76.16 098-413-006 $76.16 098-413-007 $76.16 098-413-008 $76.16 098-413-009 $76.16 098-413-010 $76.16 098-413-011 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-413-012 $76.16 098-413-013 $76.16 098-413-014 $76.16 098-413-015 $76.16 098-413-016 $76.16 098-413-017 $76.16 098-413-018 $76.16 098-413-019 $76.16 098-413-020 $76.16 098-413-021 $76.16 098-413-022 $76.16 098-413-023 $76.16 098-413-024 $76.16 098-413-025 $76.16 098-413-026 $76.16 098-413-027 $76.16 098-413-028 $76.16 098-413-029 $76.16 098-413-030 $76.16 098-413-031 $76.16 098-413-032 $76.16 098-413-033 $76.16 098-413-034 $76.16 098-413-035 $76.16 098-413-036 $76.16 098-413-037 $76.16 098-413-038 $76.16 098-413-039 $76.16 098-413-040 $76.16 098-413-041 $76.16 098-413-042 $76.16 098-413-043 $76.16 098-413-044 $76.16 098-414-001 $76.16 098-414-002 $76.16 098-414-003 $76.16 098-414-004 $76.16 098-414-005 $76.16 098-414-006 $76.16 098-421-001 $76.16 098-421-002 $76.16 098-421-003 $76.16 098-421-004 $76.16 098-421-005 $76.16 098-421-006 $76.16 098-421-007 $76.16 098-421-008 $76.16 098-421-009 $76.16 098-421-010 $76.16 098-421-011 $76.16 098-421-012 $76.16 098-421-013 $76.16 098-421-014 $76.16 098-421-015 $76.16 098-422-001 $76.16 098-422-002 $76.16 2 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONES 1,2,4 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2830 MA LEVY CODE: Lynbrook-Bay Point Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-422-003 $76.16 098-422-004 $76.16 098-422-005 $76.16 098-422-006 $76.16 098-422-007 $76.16 098-422-008 $76.16 098-422-009 $76.16 098-422-010 $76.16 098-422-011 $76.16 098-422-012 $76.16 098-422-013 $76.16 098-430-001 $38.08 098-430-002 $38.08 098-430-003 $38.08 098-430-004 $38.08 098-430-005 $38.08 098-430-006 $38.08 098-430-007 $38.08 098-430-008 $38.08 098-430-009 $38.08 098-430-010 $38.08 098-430-011 $38.08 098-430-012 $38.08 098-430-013 $38.08 098-430-014 $38.08 098-430-015 $38.08 098-430-016 $38.08 098-430-017 $38.08 098-430-018 $38.08 098-430-019 $76.16 098-430-020 $38.08 098-430-021 $38.08 098-430-022 $38.08 098-430-023 $38.08 098-430-024 $38.08 098-430-025 $38.08 098-430-026 $38.08 098-430-027 $38.08 098-430-028 $38.08 098-430-029 $38.08 098-430-030 $76.16 098-430-031 $38.08 098-430-032 $38.08 098-430-033 $38.08 098-430-034 $38.08 098-430-035 $38.08 098-430-036 $38.08 098-430-037 $38.08 098-430-038 $38.08 098-430-039 $76.16 098-430-040 $38.08 098-430-041 $38.08 098-430-042 $38.08 098-430-043 $38.08 098-431-001 $38.08 098-431-002 $38.08 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-431-003 $76.16 098-431-004 $76.16 098-431-005 $76.16 098-431-006 $38.08 098-431-007 $38.08 098-431-008 $38.08 098-431-009 $38.08 098-431-010 $38.08 098-431-011 $38.08 098-431-012 $76.16 098-431-013 $38.08 098-431-014 $38.08 098-431-015 $38.08 098-431-016 $38.08 098-431-017 $38.08 098-431-018 $38.08 098-432-001 $38.08 098-432-002 $38.08 098-432-003 $38.08 098-432-004 $38.08 098-432-005 $38.08 098-432-006 $38.08 098-432-007 $76.16 098-432-008 $38.08 098-432-009 $38.08 098-432-010 $76.16 098-432-011 $38.08 098-432-012 $38.08 098-432-013 $38.08 098-432-014 $38.08 098-432-015 $38.08 098-432-016 $38.08 098-432-017 $38.08 098-432-018 $38.08 098-432-019 $38.08 098-432-020 $38.08 098-432-021 $76.16 098-432-022 $76.16 098-433-001 $38.08 098-433-002 $76.16 098-433-003 $38.08 098-433-004 $38.08 098-433-005 $38.08 098-433-006 $38.08 098-433-007 $38.08 098-433-008 $38.08 098-433-009 $38.08 098-433-010 $38.08 098-433-011 $38.08 098-433-012 $38.08 098-441-001 $76.16 098-441-002 $76.16 098-441-003 $76.16 098-441-004 $76.16 098-441-005 $76.16 098-441-006 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-441-007 $76.16 098-441-008 $76.16 098-441-009 $76.16 098-441-010 $76.16 098-441-011 $76.16 098-441-012 $76.16 098-441-013 $76.16 098-441-014 $76.16 098-441-015 $76.16 098-441-016 $76.16 098-441-017 $76.16 098-441-018 $76.16 098-441-019 $76.16 098-441-020 $76.16 098-441-021 $76.16 098-441-022 $76.16 098-441-023 $76.16 098-441-024 $76.16 098-441-025 $76.16 098-441-026 $76.16 098-441-027 $76.16 098-441-028 $76.16 098-441-029 $76.16 098-441-030 $76.16 098-441-031 $76.16 098-441-032 $76.16 098-441-033 $76.16 098-441-034 $76.16 098-441-035 $76.16 098-441-036 $76.16 098-441-037 $76.16 098-441-038 $76.16 098-441-039 $76.16 098-441-040 $76.16 098-441-041 $76.16 098-441-042 $76.16 098-441-043 $76.16 098-441-044 $76.16 098-441-045 $76.16 098-441-046 $76.16 098-441-047 $76.16 098-441-048 $76.16 098-441-049 $76.16 098-441-050 $76.16 098-441-051 $76.16 098-441-052 $76.16 098-441-053 $76.16 098-441-054 $76.16 098-441-055 $76.16 098-441-056 $76.16 098-441-057 $76.16 098-441-058 $76.16 098-441-059 $76.16 098-441-060 $76.16 098-442-001 $76.16 098-442-002 $76.16 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-442-003 $76.16 098-442-004 $76.16 098-442-005 $76.16 098-442-006 $76.16 098-442-007 $76.16 098-442-008 $76.16 098-442-009 $76.16 098-442-010 $76.16 098-442-011 $76.16 098-442-012 $76.16 098-442-013 $76.16 098-442-014 $76.16 098-442-015 $76.16 098-442-016 $76.16 098-442-017 $76.16 098-442-018 $76.16 098-442-019 $76.16 098-442-020 $76.16 098-442-021 $76.16 098-442-022 $76.16 098-442-023 $76.16 098-442-024 $76.16 098-442-025 $76.16 098-442-026 $76.16 098-442-027 $76.16 098-442-028 $76.16 098-442-029 $76.16 098-443-001 $76.16 098-443-002 $76.16 098-443-003 $76.16 098-443-004 $76.16 098-443-005 $76.16 098-443-006 $76.16 098-443-007 $76.16 098-443-008 $76.16 098-443-009 $76.16 098-443-010 $76.16 098-443-011 $76.16 098-443-012 $76.16 098-443-013 $76.16 098-443-014 $76.16 098-443-015 $76.16 098-443-016 $76.16 098-443-017 $76.16 098-443-018 $76.16 098-443-019 $76.16 098-443-020 $76.16 098-443-021 $76.16 098-443-022 $76.16 098-443-023 $76.16 098-443-024 $76.16 098-443-025 $76.16 098-443-026 $76.16 098-443-027 $76.16 098-443-028 $76.16 098-443-029 $76.16 3 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONES 1,2,4 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2830 MA LEVY CODE: Lynbrook-Bay Point Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-443-030 $76.16 098-443-031 $76.16 098-443-032 $76.16 098-443-033 $76.16 098-443-034 $76.16 098-443-035 $76.16 098-443-036 $76.16 098-443-037 $76.16 098-443-038 $76.16 098-443-039 $76.16 098-443-040 $76.16 098-450-002 $9,329.60 684Total Parcels: $61,327.84 Total Assessment: 4 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 3 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2831 ML LEVY CODE: Hickory Meadows - Bay Point Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 093-201-001 $180.08 093-201-002 $180.08 093-201-003 $180.08 093-201-004 $180.08 093-201-005 $180.08 093-201-006 $180.08 093-201-007 $180.08 093-201-008 $180.08 093-201-009 $180.08 093-201-010 $180.08 093-201-011 $180.08 093-201-012 $180.08 093-201-013 $180.08 093-201-014 $180.08 093-201-015 $180.08 093-201-016 $180.08 093-201-017 $180.08 093-201-018 $180.08 093-201-019 $180.08 093-201-020 $180.08 093-201-021 $180.08 093-201-022 $180.08 093-201-023 $180.08 093-201-024 $180.08 093-201-025 $180.08 093-201-026 $180.08 093-201-027 $180.08 093-201-028 $180.08 093-201-029 $180.08 093-201-030 $180.08 093-201-031 $180.08 093-201-032 $180.08 093-201-033 $180.08 093-201-034 $180.08 093-202-001 $180.08 093-202-002 $180.08 093-202-003 $180.08 093-202-004 $180.08 093-202-005 $180.08 093-202-006 $180.08 093-202-007 $180.08 093-202-008 $180.08 093-202-009 $180.08 093-203-001 $180.08 093-203-002 $180.08 093-203-003 $180.08 093-203-004 $180.08 093-203-005 $180.08 093-203-006 $180.08 093-203-007 $180.08 093-203-008 $180.08 093-203-009 $180.08 093-203-010 $180.08 093-203-011 $180.08 093-203-012 $180.08 093-203-013 $180.08 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 093-203-014 $180.08 093-203-015 $180.08 093-203-016 $180.08 093-203-017 $180.08 093-203-018 $180.08 093-203-019 $180.08 093-203-020 $180.08 093-203-021 $180.08 093-204-001 $180.08 093-204-002 $180.08 093-204-003 $180.08 093-204-004 $180.08 093-204-005 $180.08 093-204-006 $180.08 093-204-007 $180.08 093-204-008 $180.08 093-204-009 $180.08 093-204-010 $180.08 093-204-011 $180.08 093-204-012 $180.08 093-204-013 $180.08 093-204-014 $180.08 78Total Parcels: $14,046.24 Total Assessment: 5 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2824 NC LEVY CODE: Pacheco Beautification Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-032-004 $70.10 125-032-005 $70.10 125-032-006 $70.10 125-032-012 $70.10 125-032-030 $70.10 125-032-031 $90.42 125-032-032 $70.10 125-032-033 $35.04 125-032-035 $70.10 125-046-001 $70.10 125-046-002 $35.04 125-046-009 $82.72 125-046-010 $70.10 125-071-005 $70.10 125-071-008 $70.10 125-071-009 $70.10 125-071-010 $70.10 125-071-011 $35.04 125-071-012 $35.04 125-072-005 $70.10 125-072-006 $70.10 125-072-007 $70.10 125-072-008 $70.10 125-072-009 $70.10 125-072-010 $70.10 125-072-011 $70.10 125-072-012 $70.10 125-072-013 $70.10 125-072-014 $70.10 125-072-015 $70.10 125-073-003 $70.10 125-074-004 $70.10 125-074-005 $70.10 125-074-006 $70.10 125-074-009 $70.10 125-074-010 $70.10 125-074-011 $70.10 125-074-012 $70.10 125-074-013 $70.10 125-074-014 $70.10 125-074-016 $70.10 125-074-017 $70.10 125-074-018 $70.10 125-075-003 $70.10 125-075-004 $70.10 125-075-005 $70.10 125-075-007 $70.10 125-075-010 $70.10 125-075-011 $70.10 125-075-012 $70.10 125-075-013 $35.04 125-076-002 $70.10 125-077-018 $70.10 125-077-024 $70.10 125-077-028 $157.02 125-080-007 $70.10 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-080-008 $70.10 125-080-012 $70.10 125-080-019 $70.10 125-080-020 $70.10 125-080-021 $70.10 125-080-035 $70.10 125-080-036 $70.10 125-080-037 $70.10 125-080-038 $70.10 125-080-039 $70.10 125-080-040 $70.10 125-080-041 $70.10 125-080-042 $70.10 125-080-043 $70.10 125-080-044 $70.10 125-080-045 $70.10 125-080-046 $70.10 125-080-047 $70.10 125-080-048 $70.10 125-080-049 $70.10 125-080-050 $70.10 125-080-051 $70.10 125-080-052 $70.10 125-080-053 $70.10 125-080-054 $70.10 125-080-055 $70.10 125-080-056 $70.10 125-080-057 $70.10 125-080-058 $70.10 125-080-059 $70.10 125-080-060 $70.10 125-080-061 $70.10 125-080-062 $70.10 125-080-063 $70.10 125-080-064 $70.10 125-080-065 $70.10 125-080-066 $70.10 125-080-067 $70.10 125-080-068 $70.10 125-080-069 $70.10 125-080-070 $70.10 125-080-071 $70.10 125-080-072 $70.10 125-080-073 $70.10 125-080-074 $70.10 125-080-075 $70.10 125-080-076 $70.10 125-080-077 $70.10 125-080-078 $70.10 125-080-079 $70.10 125-080-080 $70.10 125-080-081 $70.10 125-080-082 $70.10 125-080-083 $70.10 125-080-084 $70.10 125-080-085 $70.10 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-080-086 $70.10 125-080-087 $70.10 125-080-088 $70.10 125-080-089 $70.10 125-080-090 $70.10 125-080-091 $70.10 125-080-092 $70.10 125-080-093 $70.10 125-080-094 $70.10 125-080-095 $70.10 125-080-096 $70.10 125-080-097 $70.10 125-080-098 $70.10 125-080-099 $70.10 125-080-100 $70.10 125-080-101 $70.10 125-080-102 $70.10 125-080-103 $70.10 125-080-104 $70.10 125-080-105 $70.10 125-080-107 $35.04 125-080-108 $35.04 125-080-109 $35.04 125-080-110 $35.04 125-080-111 $35.04 125-080-112 $35.04 125-080-113 $35.04 125-080-114 $35.04 125-080-115 $35.04 125-080-116 $35.04 125-080-117 $35.04 125-080-118 $35.04 125-080-119 $35.04 125-080-120 $35.04 125-080-121 $35.04 125-080-122 $35.04 125-090-001 $70.10 125-090-002 $70.10 125-090-003 $70.10 125-090-004 $70.10 125-090-005 $70.10 125-090-006 $70.10 125-090-009 $70.10 125-090-010 $70.10 125-090-032 $70.10 125-090-033 $70.10 125-090-036 $70.10 125-090-037 $70.10 125-090-038 $70.10 125-090-039 $70.10 125-090-067 $35.04 125-090-068 $70.10 125-090-069 $70.10 125-090-070 $70.10 125-090-071 $70.10 125-090-072 $70.10 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-091-051 $70.10 125-091-052 $70.10 125-091-053 $70.10 125-091-054 $70.10 125-091-055 $70.10 125-091-056 $70.10 125-091-057 $70.10 125-091-058 $70.10 125-091-059 $70.10 125-091-060 $70.10 125-091-061 $70.10 125-091-062 $70.10 125-091-063 $70.10 125-091-064 $70.10 125-091-065 $70.10 125-091-066 $70.10 125-091-067 $70.10 125-091-068 $70.10 125-091-069 $70.10 125-091-070 $70.10 125-091-071 $70.10 125-091-072 $70.10 125-091-073 $70.10 125-091-074 $70.10 125-091-075 $70.10 125-091-076 $70.10 125-091-077 $70.10 125-091-078 $70.10 125-091-079 $70.10 125-091-080 $70.10 125-100-009 $70.10 125-100-010 $70.10 125-100-011 $70.10 125-100-012 $70.10 125-100-013 $70.10 125-100-014 $70.10 125-100-015 $70.10 125-100-016 $105.14 125-100-017 $70.10 125-100-018 $35.04 125-100-021 $70.10 125-100-022 $70.10 125-100-023 $70.10 125-100-026 $35.04 125-100-027 $70.10 125-100-035 $35.04 125-100-037 $70.10 125-100-039 $210.30 125-111-001 $70.10 125-111-002 $70.10 125-111-003 $70.10 125-111-004 $70.10 125-111-005 $70.10 125-111-006 $70.10 125-111-007 $70.10 125-111-008 $70.10 6 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2824 NC LEVY CODE: Pacheco Beautification Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-111-009 $70.10 125-111-010 $70.10 125-111-011 $70.10 125-111-012 $70.10 125-111-013 $70.10 125-111-014 $70.10 125-111-015 $70.10 125-111-016 $70.10 125-111-017 $70.10 125-111-018 $70.10 125-111-019 $70.10 125-111-020 $70.10 125-111-021 $70.10 125-111-022 $70.10 125-111-023 $70.10 125-111-024 $70.10 125-111-025 $70.10 125-111-026 $70.10 125-111-027 $70.10 125-111-028 $70.10 125-112-001 $70.10 125-112-002 $70.10 125-112-003 $70.10 125-113-001 $70.10 125-113-002 $70.10 125-113-003 $70.10 125-113-004 $70.10 125-113-005 $70.10 125-113-006 $70.10 125-113-007 $70.10 125-113-008 $70.10 125-113-009 $70.10 125-113-010 $70.10 125-114-005 $70.10 125-114-006 $70.10 125-114-007 $70.10 125-114-008 $70.10 125-114-009 $70.10 125-114-010 $70.10 125-114-011 $70.10 125-114-012 $70.10 125-114-013 $70.10 125-114-014 $70.10 125-114-015 $70.10 125-114-016 $70.10 125-114-017 $70.10 125-114-019 $70.10 125-114-020 $70.10 125-114-021 $70.10 125-114-022 $70.10 125-115-002 $70.10 125-115-003 $70.10 125-115-004 $70.10 125-115-005 $70.10 125-115-006 $70.10 125-115-007 $70.10 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-115-008 $70.10 125-115-009 $70.10 125-115-010 $70.10 125-120-003 $70.10 125-120-007 $70.10 125-120-010 $70.10 125-120-012 $70.10 125-120-014 $70.10 125-120-015 $70.10 125-120-017 $35.04 125-120-021 $140.20 125-120-025 $70.10 125-120-026 $70.10 125-120-034 $70.10 125-120-037 $70.10 125-120-038 $70.10 125-120-039 $70.10 125-120-040 $70.10 125-120-041 $70.10 125-120-042 $70.10 125-120-045 $70.10 125-120-046 $70.10 125-120-047 $70.10 125-120-048 $70.10 125-120-049 $70.10 125-120-050 $70.10 125-120-051 $70.10 125-120-052 $70.10 125-120-053 $70.10 125-120-054 $70.10 125-120-055 $70.10 125-120-056 $70.10 125-120-057 $70.10 125-120-058 $70.10 125-120-063 $70.10 125-120-064 $70.10 125-120-065 $70.10 125-120-066 $70.10 125-120-067 $70.10 125-120-068 $70.10 125-120-069 $70.10 125-120-070 $70.10 125-120-071 $70.10 125-120-072 $70.10 125-120-073 $35.04 125-120-074 $70.10 125-120-075 $70.10 125-120-076 $70.10 125-120-078 $70.10 125-120-079 $70.10 125-120-083 $70.10 125-120-085 $70.10 125-120-086 $70.10 125-120-091 $70.10 125-120-092 $70.10 125-120-093 $70.10 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-120-095 $70.10 125-120-096 $70.10 125-120-097 $70.10 125-120-098 $70.10 125-120-099 $70.10 125-120-100 $70.10 125-120-105 $35.04 125-120-109 $350.50 125-120-110 $86.92 125-120-111 $70.10 125-120-112 $981.40 125-120-113 $35.04 125-120-114 $35.04 125-120-115 $35.04 125-120-116 $35.04 125-130-018 $139.50 125-130-021 $70.10 125-140-005 $35.04 125-140-006 $420.60 125-140-007 $70.10 125-140-008 $70.10 125-140-010 $70.10 125-140-011 $70.10 125-140-012 $70.10 125-140-013 $70.10 125-140-014 $70.10 125-140-015 $70.10 125-140-016 $70.10 125-140-017 $70.10 125-140-018 $70.10 125-140-019 $70.10 125-140-020 $70.10 125-140-021 $70.10 125-140-022 $70.10 125-140-023 $70.10 125-140-027 $91.82 125-140-028 $70.10 125-151-001 $70.10 125-151-002 $70.10 125-151-003 $70.10 125-151-004 $70.10 125-151-005 $70.10 125-151-006 $70.10 125-151-007 $70.10 125-151-008 $70.10 125-151-009 $70.10 125-151-010 $70.10 125-151-011 $70.10 125-151-012 $70.10 125-151-013 $70.10 125-151-014 $70.10 125-151-015 $70.10 125-152-001 $70.10 125-152-002 $70.10 125-152-003 $70.10 125-152-004 $70.10 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-152-005 $70.10 125-152-006 $70.10 125-152-007 $70.10 125-152-008 $70.10 125-152-009 $70.10 125-152-010 $70.10 125-152-011 $70.10 125-152-012 $70.10 125-152-013 $70.10 125-153-001 $70.10 125-153-002 $70.10 125-153-003 $70.10 125-153-004 $70.10 125-153-005 $70.10 125-153-006 $70.10 125-153-007 $70.10 125-153-008 $70.10 125-155-001 $70.10 125-155-002 $70.10 125-155-003 $70.10 125-155-004 $70.10 125-155-005 $70.10 125-155-006 $70.10 125-155-007 $70.10 125-155-008 $70.10 125-155-009 $70.10 125-155-010 $70.10 125-155-011 $70.10 125-155-012 $70.10 125-155-013 $70.10 125-155-014 $70.10 125-155-015 $70.10 125-155-016 $70.10 125-155-017 $70.10 125-155-021 $35.04 125-155-022 $70.10 125-155-024 $35.04 125-155-026 $35.04 125-155-029 $35.04 125-155-030 $35.04 125-155-031 $35.04 125-155-032 $35.04 125-155-033 $35.04 125-155-034 $35.04 125-155-035 $35.04 125-155-036 $35.04 125-155-037 $35.04 125-155-038 $35.04 125-155-039 $35.04 125-155-040 $35.04 125-155-041 $35.04 125-155-042 $35.04 125-155-043 $35.04 125-155-044 $35.04 125-155-045 $35.04 125-155-046 $35.04 7 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2824 NC LEVY CODE: Pacheco Beautification Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-155-047 $35.04 125-155-048 $35.04 125-155-049 $35.04 125-155-050 $35.04 125-155-051 $70.10 125-155-052 $70.10 125-156-001 $70.10 125-156-002 $70.10 125-156-003 $70.10 125-156-004 $70.10 125-156-005 $70.10 125-156-006 $70.10 125-156-007 $70.10 125-156-008 $70.10 125-156-009 $70.10 125-156-010 $70.10 125-156-011 $70.10 125-156-012 $70.10 125-156-013 $70.10 125-156-014 $70.10 125-156-015 $70.10 125-156-016 $70.10 125-156-017 $70.10 125-156-018 $70.10 125-156-019 $70.10 125-156-020 $70.10 125-156-021 $70.10 125-156-022 $70.10 125-156-023 $70.10 125-156-024 $70.10 125-156-025 $70.10 125-156-026 $70.10 125-156-027 $70.10 125-156-028 $70.10 125-156-029 $70.10 125-156-030 $70.10 125-156-031 $70.10 125-156-032 $70.10 125-156-033 $70.10 125-156-034 $70.10 125-156-035 $70.10 125-156-036 $70.10 125-156-037 $70.10 125-156-038 $70.10 125-156-039 $70.10 125-161-001 $70.10 125-161-002 $70.10 125-161-003 $70.10 125-161-004 $70.10 125-161-005 $70.10 125-161-006 $70.10 125-161-007 $70.10 125-161-008 $70.10 125-161-009 $70.10 125-161-010 $70.10 125-162-001 $70.10 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-162-002 $70.10 125-162-003 $70.10 125-162-004 $70.10 125-163-001 $70.10 125-163-002 $70.10 125-163-003 $70.10 125-163-004 $70.10 125-163-005 $70.10 125-163-006 $70.10 125-163-007 $70.10 125-163-008 $70.10 125-163-009 $70.10 125-163-010 $70.10 125-163-011 $70.10 125-163-012 $70.10 125-163-013 $70.10 125-163-014 $70.10 125-163-015 $70.10 125-163-016 $70.10 125-163-017 $70.10 125-163-018 $70.10 125-163-019 $70.10 125-163-020 $70.10 125-163-021 $70.10 125-163-022 $70.10 125-164-001 $70.10 125-164-002 $70.10 125-164-003 $70.10 125-164-004 $70.10 125-164-005 $70.10 125-164-006 $70.10 125-164-007 $70.10 125-164-008 $70.10 125-164-009 $70.10 125-164-010 $70.10 125-165-001 $70.10 125-165-002 $70.10 125-165-003 $70.10 125-165-004 $70.10 125-165-005 $70.10 125-165-006 $70.10 125-165-007 $70.10 125-165-008 $70.10 125-165-009 $70.10 125-171-001 $70.10 125-171-002 $70.10 125-171-003 $70.10 125-171-004 $70.10 125-171-005 $70.10 125-171-006 $70.10 125-172-001 $70.10 125-172-002 $70.10 125-172-003 $70.10 125-172-004 $70.10 125-172-005 $70.10 125-172-006 $70.10 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-172-007 $70.10 125-172-008 $70.10 125-172-009 $70.10 125-173-001 $70.10 125-173-002 $70.10 125-173-003 $70.10 125-173-004 $70.10 125-173-005 $70.10 125-174-001 $70.10 125-174-002 $70.10 125-174-003 $70.10 125-174-004 $70.10 125-174-005 $70.10 125-174-006 $70.10 125-174-007 $70.10 125-174-008 $70.10 125-174-009 $70.10 125-174-010 $70.10 125-181-001 $70.10 125-181-002 $70.10 125-181-003 $70.10 125-181-004 $70.10 125-181-005 $70.10 125-181-006 $70.10 125-181-007 $70.10 125-181-008 $70.10 125-182-001 $70.10 125-182-002 $70.10 125-182-003 $70.10 125-182-004 $70.10 125-182-005 $70.10 125-182-006 $70.10 125-182-007 $70.10 125-182-008 $70.10 125-182-009 $70.10 125-182-010 $70.10 125-182-011 $70.10 125-182-012 $70.10 125-182-013 $70.10 125-182-014 $70.10 125-182-015 $70.10 125-182-016 $70.10 125-182-017 $70.10 125-182-018 $70.10 125-182-019 $70.10 125-182-020 $70.10 125-183-001 $70.10 125-183-002 $70.10 125-183-003 $70.10 125-183-004 $70.10 125-183-005 $70.10 125-183-006 $70.10 125-184-001 $70.10 125-184-002 $70.10 125-184-003 $70.10 125-184-004 $70.10 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-184-005 $70.10 125-184-006 $70.10 125-184-007 $70.10 125-184-008 $70.10 125-185-003 $70.10 125-185-018 $70.10 125-185-022 $70.10 125-185-023 $70.10 125-185-024 $70.10 125-185-025 $70.10 125-185-026 $70.10 125-186-001 $70.10 125-186-002 $70.10 125-186-003 $70.10 125-186-004 $70.10 125-186-005 $70.10 125-191-001 $70.10 125-191-002 $70.10 125-191-003 $70.10 125-191-004 $70.10 125-191-005 $70.10 125-191-006 $70.10 125-191-007 $70.10 125-191-008 $70.10 125-191-009 $70.10 125-191-010 $70.10 125-191-011 $70.10 125-191-012 $70.10 125-191-013 $70.10 125-191-014 $70.10 125-191-015 $70.10 125-191-016 $70.10 125-191-017 $70.10 125-192-001 $70.10 125-192-002 $70.10 125-192-003 $70.10 125-192-004 $70.10 125-192-005 $70.10 125-192-006 $70.10 125-192-007 $70.10 125-192-008 $70.10 125-192-009 $70.10 125-193-001 $70.10 125-193-002 $70.10 125-193-003 $70.10 125-193-004 $70.10 125-193-005 $70.10 125-193-006 $70.10 125-193-007 $70.10 125-193-008 $70.10 125-193-009 $70.10 125-193-010 $70.10 125-193-011 $70.10 125-193-012 $70.10 125-193-013 $70.10 125-193-014 $70.10 8 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2824 NC LEVY CODE: Pacheco Beautification Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-193-015 $70.10 125-193-016 $70.10 125-193-017 $70.10 125-193-018 $70.10 125-193-045 $70.10 125-193-050 $70.10 125-193-051 $70.10 125-193-052 $70.10 125-193-053 $70.10 125-193-054 $70.10 125-193-055 $70.10 125-193-056 $70.10 125-220-002 $70.10 125-220-007 $70.10 125-220-010 $84.12 125-220-011 $70.10 125-220-012 $70.10 125-220-015 $70.10 125-220-016 $74.30 125-220-017 $70.10 125-220-018 $70.10 125-220-019 $35.04 125-220-020 $35.04 125-231-010 $75.00 125-231-011 $75.70 125-231-012 $142.30 125-231-013 $210.30 125-232-002 $136.70 125-232-003 $210.30 125-232-005 $161.22 125-232-006 $70.10 125-232-007 $117.06 125-232-008 $70.10 125-240-023 $210.30 125-240-029 $210.30 125-240-032 $171.04 125-240-034 $161.22 125-240-037 $79.20 125-240-038 $93.92 125-240-045 $90.42 125-240-046 $77.80 125-240-047 $70.10 125-240-048 $117.76 125-240-049 $117.76 125-240-050 $80.62 125-240-056 $210.30 125-260-001 $70.10 125-260-002 $70.10 125-260-005 $70.10 125-260-006 $35.04 125-260-007 $70.10 125-260-008 $70.10 125-260-009 $70.10 125-260-010 $35.04 125-260-011 $70.10 125-260-012 $70.10 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-271-001 $70.10 125-271-004 $70.10 125-271-006 $70.10 125-271-009 $70.10 125-271-010 $70.10 125-271-012 $70.10 125-271-013 $35.04 125-271-014 $70.10 125-271-015 $70.10 125-272-002 $70.10 125-272-003 $70.10 125-272-004 $35.04 125-272-005 $70.10 125-272-006 $70.10 125-272-007 $70.10 125-272-008 $70.10 125-272-009 $70.10 125-272-012 $70.10 125-272-013 $70.10 125-272-014 $70.10 125-272-015 $70.10 125-272-017 $70.10 125-272-018 $70.10 125-272-023 $70.10 125-272-024 $70.10 125-272-025 $70.10 125-272-026 $70.10 125-272-027 $35.04 125-272-028 $70.10 125-281-001 $70.10 125-281-002 $70.10 125-281-003 $70.10 125-281-004 $70.10 125-281-005 $70.10 125-281-006 $70.10 125-281-008 $70.10 125-281-009 $70.10 125-281-010 $70.10 125-281-011 $70.10 125-281-012 $70.10 125-281-013 $70.10 125-281-014 $70.10 125-282-001 $70.10 125-282-002 $70.10 125-282-004 $70.10 125-282-005 $70.10 125-282-009 $70.10 125-282-010 $70.10 125-282-011 $70.10 125-282-012 $70.10 125-282-013 $70.10 125-282-014 $70.10 125-282-016 $70.10 125-282-017 $70.10 125-282-018 $70.10 125-282-019 $70.10 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-282-021 $70.10 125-282-022 $70.10 125-282-023 $70.10 125-282-024 $70.10 125-282-026 $70.10 125-282-027 $70.10 125-282-028 $70.10 125-282-029 $70.10 125-292-004 $70.10 125-292-005 $70.10 125-292-006 $70.10 125-292-007 $70.10 125-292-008 $70.10 125-330-001 $35.04 125-330-002 $35.04 125-330-003 $35.04 125-330-004 $35.04 125-330-005 $35.04 125-330-006 $35.04 125-330-007 $35.04 125-330-008 $35.04 125-330-009 $35.04 125-330-010 $35.04 125-330-011 $35.04 125-330-012 $35.04 125-330-013 $35.04 125-330-014 $35.04 125-330-015 $35.04 125-330-016 $35.04 125-330-017 $35.04 125-330-018 $35.04 125-330-019 $35.04 125-330-020 $35.04 125-330-021 $35.04 125-330-022 $35.04 125-330-023 $35.04 125-330-024 $35.04 125-330-025 $35.04 125-330-026 $35.04 125-330-027 $35.04 125-330-028 $35.04 125-330-029 $35.04 125-330-030 $35.04 125-330-031 $35.04 125-330-032 $35.04 125-330-033 $35.04 125-330-034 $35.04 125-330-035 $35.04 125-330-036 $35.04 125-330-037 $35.04 125-330-038 $35.04 125-330-039 $35.04 125-330-040 $35.04 125-330-041 $35.04 125-330-042 $35.04 125-330-043 $35.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-330-044 $35.04 125-330-045 $35.04 125-340-014 $70.10 125-350-001 $35.04 125-350-002 $35.04 125-350-003 $35.04 125-350-004 $35.04 125-350-005 $35.04 125-350-006 $35.04 125-350-007 $35.04 125-350-008 $35.04 125-350-009 $35.04 125-350-010 $35.04 125-350-011 $35.04 125-350-012 $35.04 125-350-013 $35.04 125-350-014 $35.04 125-350-015 $35.04 125-350-016 $35.04 125-350-017 $35.04 125-350-018 $35.04 125-350-019 $35.04 125-350-020 $35.04 125-350-021 $35.04 125-350-022 $35.04 125-350-023 $35.04 125-350-024 $35.04 125-350-025 $35.04 125-350-026 $35.04 125-350-027 $35.04 125-350-028 $35.04 125-350-029 $35.04 125-350-030 $35.04 125-350-031 $35.04 125-350-032 $35.04 125-350-033 $35.04 125-350-034 $35.04 125-350-035 $35.04 125-350-036 $35.04 125-360-001 $35.04 125-360-002 $35.04 125-360-003 $35.04 125-360-004 $35.04 125-360-005 $35.04 125-360-006 $35.04 125-360-007 $35.04 125-360-008 $35.04 125-360-009 $35.04 125-360-010 $35.04 125-360-011 $35.04 125-360-012 $35.04 125-360-013 $35.04 125-360-014 $35.04 125-360-015 $35.04 125-360-016 $35.04 125-360-017 $35.04 9 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 5 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2824 NC LEVY CODE: Pacheco Beautification Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-360-018 $35.04 125-360-019 $35.04 125-360-020 $35.04 125-360-021 $35.04 125-360-022 $35.04 125-360-023 $35.04 125-360-024 $35.04 125-360-025 $35.04 125-360-026 $35.04 125-360-027 $35.04 125-360-028 $35.04 125-360-029 $35.04 908Total Parcels: $60,896.08 Total Assessment: 10 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 7 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2834 MO LEVY CODE: Pleasant Hill BART RDA Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 148-202-057 $1,458.54 148-202-071 $319.66 148-221-033 $2,892.24 148-221-040 $806.00 148-221-041 $3,743.06 148-221-042 $3,501.26 148-221-044 $596.44 148-231-029 $1,701.62 148-250-083 $5,013.48 148-250-090 $6,009.20 148-250-091 $1,273.16 148-260-053 $16.12 148-260-054 $483.60 148-260-055 $483.60 148-260-060 $464.08 148-260-062 $163.30 148-260-063 $112.02 148-270-017 $57.70 148-270-018 $16.12 148-270-050 $905.14 148-270-053 $197.46 148-460-005 $16.12 148-460-006 $16.12 148-460-007 $16.12 148-460-008 $16.12 148-460-009 $16.12 148-460-010 $16.12 148-460-011 $16.12 148-460-012 $16.12 148-460-013 $16.12 148-460-014 $16.12 148-460-015 $16.12 148-460-016 $16.12 148-460-017 $16.12 148-460-018 $16.12 148-460-019 $16.12 148-460-020 $16.12 148-460-021 $16.12 148-460-022 $16.12 148-460-023 $16.12 148-460-024 $16.12 148-460-025 $16.12 148-460-026 $16.12 148-460-027 $16.12 148-460-028 $16.12 148-460-029 $16.12 148-460-030 $16.12 148-460-031 $16.12 148-460-032 $16.12 148-460-033 $16.12 148-460-034 $16.12 148-460-035 $16.12 148-460-036 $16.12 148-460-037 $16.12 148-460-038 $16.12 148-460-039 $16.12 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 148-460-040 $16.12 148-460-046 $16.12 148-460-047 $16.12 148-460-048 $16.12 148-460-049 $16.12 148-460-050 $16.12 148-460-051 $16.12 148-460-052 $16.12 148-460-053 $16.12 148-460-054 $16.12 148-460-055 $16.12 148-460-056 $16.12 148-460-057 $16.12 148-460-058 $16.12 148-460-059 $16.12 148-460-060 $16.12 148-460-061 $16.12 148-460-062 $16.12 148-460-063 $16.12 148-460-064 $16.12 148-460-065 $16.12 148-460-066 $16.12 148-460-067 $16.12 148-460-068 $16.12 148-460-069 $16.12 148-460-070 $16.12 148-460-071 $16.12 148-460-072 $16.12 148-460-073 $16.12 148-460-074 $16.12 148-460-075 $16.12 148-460-076 $16.12 148-460-077 $16.12 148-460-078 $16.12 148-460-079 $16.12 148-460-080 $16.12 148-460-081 $16.12 148-460-082 $16.12 148-460-083 $16.12 148-460-084 $16.12 148-460-085 $16.12 148-460-086 $16.12 148-460-087 $16.12 148-460-088 $16.12 148-460-089 $16.12 148-460-090 $16.12 148-460-091 $16.12 148-460-092 $16.12 148-460-093 $16.12 148-460-094 $16.12 148-460-095 $16.12 148-460-096 $16.12 148-460-097 $16.12 148-460-098 $16.12 148-460-099 $16.12 148-460-100 $16.12 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 148-460-101 $16.12 148-460-102 $16.12 148-460-103 $16.12 148-460-104 $16.12 148-460-105 $16.12 148-460-107 $16.12 148-460-108 $16.12 148-460-109 $16.12 148-460-110 $16.12 148-460-111 $16.12 148-460-112 $16.12 148-460-113 $16.12 148-460-114 $16.12 148-460-115 $16.12 148-460-116 $16.12 148-460-117 $16.12 148-460-118 $16.12 148-460-119 $16.12 148-460-120 $16.12 148-460-121 $16.12 148-460-122 $16.12 148-460-123 $16.12 148-460-124 $16.12 148-460-125 $16.12 148-460-126 $16.12 148-460-127 $16.12 148-460-128 $16.12 148-460-129 $16.12 148-460-130 $16.12 148-460-131 $16.12 148-460-132 $16.12 148-460-133 $16.12 148-460-134 $16.12 148-460-135 $16.12 148-460-136 $16.12 148-460-137 $16.12 148-460-138 $16.12 148-460-139 $16.12 148-460-140 $16.12 148-460-141 $16.12 148-460-142 $16.12 148-460-143 $16.12 148-460-144 $16.12 148-460-145 $16.12 148-460-146 $16.12 148-460-147 $16.12 148-460-148 $16.12 148-460-149 $16.12 148-460-150 $16.12 148-460-151 $16.12 148-460-152 $16.12 148-460-153 $16.12 148-460-154 $16.12 148-460-155 $16.12 148-460-156 $16.12 148-460-157 $16.12 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 148-460-158 $16.12 148-460-159 $16.12 148-460-160 $16.12 148-460-161 $16.12 148-460-162 $16.12 148-460-163 $16.12 148-460-164 $16.12 148-460-165 $16.12 148-460-166 $16.12 148-470-001 $5,394.56 148-470-002 $5,686.32 148-480-010 $244.38 148-480-011 $5,676.82 148-480-014 $7,444.86 148-500-001 $16.12 148-500-002 $16.12 148-500-003 $16.12 148-500-004 $16.12 148-500-005 $16.12 148-500-006 $16.12 148-500-007 $16.12 148-500-008 $16.12 148-500-009 $16.12 148-500-010 $16.12 148-500-011 $16.12 148-500-012 $16.12 148-500-013 $16.12 148-500-014 $16.12 148-500-015 $16.12 148-500-016 $16.12 148-500-017 $16.12 148-500-018 $16.12 148-500-019 $16.12 148-500-020 $16.12 148-500-021 $16.12 148-500-022 $16.12 148-500-023 $16.12 148-500-024 $16.12 148-500-025 $16.12 148-500-026 $16.12 148-500-027 $16.12 148-500-028 $16.12 148-500-029 $16.12 148-500-030 $16.12 148-500-031 $16.12 148-500-032 $16.12 148-500-033 $16.12 148-500-034 $16.12 148-500-035 $16.12 148-500-036 $16.12 148-500-037 $16.12 148-500-038 $16.12 148-500-039 $16.12 148-500-040 $16.12 148-500-041 $16.12 148-500-042 $16.12 11 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 7 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2834 MO LEVY CODE: Pleasant Hill BART RDA Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 148-500-043 $16.12 148-500-044 $16.12 148-500-045 $16.12 148-500-046 $16.12 148-500-047 $16.12 148-500-048 $16.12 148-500-049 $16.12 148-500-050 $16.12 148-500-051 $16.12 148-500-052 $16.12 148-500-053 $16.12 148-500-054 $16.12 148-500-056 $701.22 172-011-022 $7,396.18 172-020-042 $3,630.06 172-020-046 $16.12 172-020-047 $5,834.14 172-031-022 $2,412.52 172-031-023 $4,074.48 172-031-024 $10.96 172-031-025 $8.06 172-051-002 $16.12 172-051-007 $16.12 172-051-008 $16.12 172-051-009 $16.12 172-051-010 $16.12 172-051-011 $16.12 172-051-012 $16.12 172-051-013 $16.12 253Total Parcels: $82,258.64 Total Assessment: 12 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 10 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2836 ME LEVY CODE: Viewpointe - Bay Point Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-520-001 $151.86 098-520-002 $151.86 098-520-003 $151.86 098-520-004 $151.86 098-520-005 $151.86 098-520-006 $151.86 098-520-007 $151.86 098-520-008 $151.86 098-520-009 $151.86 098-520-010 $151.86 098-520-011 $151.86 098-520-012 $151.86 098-520-013 $151.86 098-520-014 $151.86 098-520-015 $151.86 098-520-016 $151.86 098-520-017 $151.86 098-520-018 $151.86 098-520-019 $151.86 098-520-020 $151.86 098-520-021 $151.86 098-520-022 $151.86 098-520-023 $151.86 098-520-024 $151.86 098-520-025 $151.86 098-520-026 $151.86 098-520-027 $151.86 098-520-028 $151.86 098-520-029 $151.86 098-520-030 $151.86 098-520-031 $151.86 098-520-032 $151.86 098-520-033 $151.86 098-520-034 $151.86 098-520-043 $151.86 098-520-044 $151.86 098-520-045 $151.86 098-520-046 $151.86 098-520-047 $151.86 098-520-048 $151.86 098-520-049 $151.86 098-520-050 $151.86 098-520-051 $151.86 098-520-052 $151.86 098-520-053 $151.86 098-520-054 $151.86 098-520-055 $151.86 098-520-056 $151.86 098-520-057 $151.86 098-520-058 $151.86 098-520-059 $151.86 098-520-060 $151.86 098-520-061 $151.86 098-520-062 $151.86 098-520-063 $151.86 098-520-064 $151.86 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-520-065 $151.86 098-520-066 $151.86 098-520-067 $151.86 098-520-068 $151.86 098-520-069 $151.86 098-520-070 $151.86 098-520-071 $151.86 098-520-072 $151.86 098-520-073 $151.86 098-520-074 $151.86 098-520-075 $151.86 098-520-076 $151.86 098-520-077 $151.86 098-520-078 $151.86 098-520-079 $151.86 098-520-080 $151.86 098-520-081 $151.86 098-520-082 $151.86 098-520-083 $151.86 098-520-084 $151.86 098-520-085 $151.86 098-520-086 $151.86 098-520-087 $151.86 098-520-088 $151.86 098-520-089 $151.86 098-520-090 $151.86 098-520-091 $151.86 098-520-092 $151.86 098-520-093 $151.86 098-520-094 $151.86 098-520-095 $151.86 098-520-096 $151.86 098-520-097 $151.86 098-530-001 $151.86 098-530-002 $151.86 098-530-003 $151.86 098-530-004 $151.86 098-530-005 $151.86 098-530-006 $151.86 098-530-007 $151.86 098-530-008 $151.86 098-530-009 $151.86 098-530-010 $151.86 098-530-011 $151.86 098-530-012 $151.86 098-530-013 $151.86 098-530-014 $151.86 098-530-015 $151.86 098-530-016 $151.86 098-530-017 $151.86 098-530-018 $151.86 098-530-019 $151.86 098-530-020 $151.86 098-530-021 $151.86 098-530-022 $151.86 098-530-023 $151.86 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-530-024 $151.86 098-530-025 $151.86 098-530-026 $151.86 098-530-027 $151.86 098-530-028 $151.86 098-530-029 $151.86 098-530-030 $151.86 119Total Parcels: $18,071.34 Total Assessment: 13 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 11 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2839 MF LEVY CODE: Hilltop Commons - San Pablo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 405-170-010 $6,000.00 1Total Parcels: $6,000.00 Total Assessment: 14 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 17 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2844 LQ LEVY CODE: Shadow Creek - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-341-001 $150.00 220-341-002 $150.00 220-341-003 $150.00 220-341-004 $150.00 220-341-005 $150.00 220-341-006 $150.00 220-341-007 $150.00 220-341-008 $150.00 220-341-009 $150.00 220-341-010 $150.00 220-341-011 $150.00 220-341-012 $150.00 220-341-013 $150.00 220-341-014 $150.00 220-341-015 $150.00 220-341-016 $150.00 220-341-017 $150.00 220-342-001 $150.00 220-342-002 $150.00 220-342-003 $150.00 220-342-004 $150.00 220-342-005 $150.00 220-342-006 $150.00 220-342-007 $150.00 220-342-008 $150.00 220-342-009 $150.00 220-343-001 $150.00 220-343-002 $150.00 220-343-003 $150.00 220-343-004 $150.00 220-343-005 $150.00 220-343-006 $150.00 220-343-007 $150.00 220-343-008 $150.00 220-343-009 $150.00 220-343-010 $150.00 220-343-011 $150.00 220-343-012 $150.00 220-343-013 $150.00 220-343-014 $150.00 220-343-015 $150.00 220-343-016 $150.00 220-343-017 $150.00 220-343-018 $150.00 220-343-019 $150.00 220-343-020 $150.00 220-343-021 $150.00 220-343-022 $150.00 220-343-023 $150.00 220-343-024 $150.00 220-343-025 $150.00 220-343-026 $150.00 220-343-027 $150.00 220-343-028 $150.00 220-343-029 $150.00 220-343-030 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-343-031 $150.00 220-343-032 $150.00 220-343-033 $150.00 220-343-034 $150.00 220-343-035 $150.00 220-343-036 $150.00 220-343-037 $150.00 220-343-038 $150.00 220-343-039 $150.00 220-343-040 $150.00 220-343-041 $150.00 220-343-042 $150.00 220-343-043 $150.00 220-343-044 $150.00 220-343-045 $150.00 220-343-046 $150.00 220-343-047 $150.00 220-343-048 $150.00 220-343-049 $150.00 220-343-050 $150.00 220-343-051 $150.00 220-371-001 $150.00 220-371-002 $150.00 220-371-003 $150.00 220-371-004 $150.00 220-371-005 $150.00 220-371-006 $150.00 220-371-007 $150.00 220-371-008 $150.00 220-371-009 $150.00 220-371-010 $150.00 220-371-011 $150.00 220-371-012 $150.00 220-371-013 $150.00 220-371-014 $150.00 220-371-015 $150.00 220-371-016 $150.00 220-371-017 $150.00 220-371-018 $150.00 220-371-019 $150.00 220-371-020 $150.00 220-371-021 $150.00 220-371-022 $150.00 220-371-023 $150.00 220-371-024 $150.00 220-371-025 $150.00 220-371-026 $150.00 220-371-027 $150.00 220-371-028 $150.00 220-371-029 $150.00 220-371-030 $150.00 220-371-031 $150.00 220-371-032 $150.00 220-371-033 $150.00 220-371-034 $150.00 220-371-035 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-371-036 $150.00 220-371-037 $150.00 220-371-038 $150.00 220-371-039 $150.00 220-371-040 $150.00 220-371-041 $150.00 220-371-042 $150.00 220-371-043 $150.00 220-371-044 $150.00 220-371-045 $150.00 220-371-046 $150.00 220-371-047 $150.00 220-371-048 $150.00 220-371-049 $150.00 220-371-050 $150.00 220-371-051 $150.00 220-371-052 $150.00 220-371-053 $150.00 220-371-054 $150.00 220-371-055 $150.00 220-371-056 $150.00 220-371-057 $150.00 220-371-058 $150.00 220-371-059 $150.00 220-371-060 $150.00 220-371-061 $150.00 220-372-001 $150.00 220-372-002 $150.00 220-372-003 $150.00 220-372-004 $150.00 220-372-005 $150.00 220-372-006 $150.00 220-372-007 $150.00 220-372-008 $150.00 220-372-009 $150.00 220-372-010 $150.00 220-372-011 $150.00 220-372-012 $150.00 220-372-013 $150.00 220-372-014 $150.00 220-372-015 $150.00 220-372-017 $150.00 220-381-002 $150.00 220-381-003 $150.00 220-381-004 $150.00 220-381-005 $150.00 220-381-006 $150.00 220-381-007 $150.00 220-381-008 $150.00 220-381-009 $150.00 220-381-010 $150.00 220-381-011 $150.00 220-381-012 $150.00 220-381-013 $150.00 220-381-014 $150.00 220-381-015 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-381-016 $150.00 220-381-017 $150.00 220-381-018 $150.00 220-381-019 $150.00 220-381-021 $150.00 220-382-001 $150.00 220-382-002 $150.00 220-382-003 $150.00 220-383-001 $150.00 220-383-002 $150.00 220-383-003 $150.00 220-383-004 $150.00 220-383-005 $150.00 220-383-006 $150.00 220-383-007 $150.00 220-383-008 $150.00 220-383-009 $150.00 220-383-010 $150.00 220-383-011 $150.00 220-383-012 $150.00 220-383-013 $150.00 220-383-014 $150.00 220-383-015 $150.00 220-383-016 $150.00 220-383-017 $150.00 220-383-018 $150.00 220-383-019 $150.00 220-383-020 $150.00 220-383-021 $150.00 220-383-022 $150.00 220-383-023 $150.00 220-383-024 $150.00 220-383-025 $150.00 220-721-001 $150.00 220-721-002 $150.00 220-722-001 $150.00 220-722-002 $150.00 220-722-003 $150.00 220-722-004 $150.00 220-722-005 $150.00 220-722-006 $150.00 220-722-007 $150.00 220-722-008 $150.00 220-722-009 $150.00 220-722-010 $150.00 220-722-011 $150.00 220-722-012 $150.00 220-722-013 $150.00 220-722-014 $150.00 220-722-015 $150.00 220-722-016 $150.00 220-722-017 $150.00 220-722-018 $150.00 220-722-019 $150.00 220-722-020 $150.00 220-722-021 $150.00 15 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 17 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2844 LQ LEVY CODE: Shadow Creek - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-722-022 $150.00 220-722-023 $150.00 220-722-024 $150.00 220-723-001 $150.00 220-723-002 $150.00 220-723-003 $150.00 220-723-004 $150.00 220-723-005 $150.00 220-723-006 $150.00 220-723-007 $150.00 220-723-008 $150.00 220-723-009 $150.00 220-723-010 $150.00 220-723-011 $150.00 220-723-012 $150.00 220-723-013 $150.00 220-723-014 $150.00 220-724-003 $150.00 220-724-004 $150.00 220-724-005 $150.00 220-724-006 $150.00 220-724-007 $150.00 220-725-001 $150.00 220-725-002 $150.00 220-725-003 $150.00 220-725-004 $150.00 220-725-005 $150.00 220-725-006 $150.00 220-725-007 $150.00 220-725-008 $150.00 220-725-009 $150.00 220-725-010 $150.00 220-725-011 $150.00 220-725-012 $150.00 220-725-013 $150.00 220-725-014 $150.00 220-725-015 $150.00 220-725-016 $150.00 220-725-017 $150.00 220-725-018 $150.00 220-725-019 $150.00 220-725-020 $150.00 220-725-021 $150.00 220-725-022 $150.00 220-725-023 $150.00 220-725-024 $150.00 220-725-025 $150.00 220-725-026 $150.00 220-725-027 $150.00 220-725-028 $150.00 220-725-029 $150.00 220-725-030 $150.00 220-725-031 $150.00 220-725-032 $150.00 220-725-033 $150.00 220-725-034 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-725-035 $150.00 220-726-001 $150.00 220-726-002 $150.00 220-726-003 $150.00 220-726-004 $150.00 220-726-005 $150.00 220-726-006 $150.00 220-731-001 $150.00 220-731-002 $150.00 220-731-003 $150.00 220-732-001 $150.00 220-732-002 $150.00 220-732-003 $150.00 220-732-004 $150.00 220-732-005 $150.00 220-732-006 $150.00 220-732-007 $150.00 220-732-008 $150.00 220-732-009 $150.00 220-732-010 $150.00 220-732-011 $150.00 220-732-012 $150.00 220-732-013 $150.00 220-732-014 $150.00 220-732-015 $150.00 220-732-016 $150.00 220-732-017 $150.00 220-732-018 $150.00 220-733-001 $150.00 220-733-002 $150.00 220-733-003 $150.00 220-733-004 $150.00 220-733-005 $150.00 220-734-001 $150.00 220-734-002 $150.00 220-734-003 $150.00 220-734-004 $150.00 220-734-005 $150.00 220-734-006 $150.00 220-734-007 $150.00 220-734-008 $150.00 220-734-009 $150.00 220-734-010 $150.00 220-734-011 $150.00 220-734-012 $150.00 220-734-013 $150.00 220-734-014 $150.00 220-734-015 $150.00 220-734-016 $150.00 220-734-017 $150.00 220-734-018 $150.00 220-735-001 $150.00 220-735-002 $150.00 220-735-003 $150.00 220-735-004 $150.00 220-735-005 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-735-006 $150.00 220-736-001 $150.00 220-736-002 $150.00 220-736-003 $150.00 220-736-004 $150.00 220-736-005 $150.00 220-737-001 $150.00 220-737-002 $150.00 220-737-003 $150.00 220-737-004 $150.00 220-737-005 $150.00 220-737-006 $150.00 220-738-001 $150.00 220-738-002 $150.00 220-738-003 $150.00 220-738-004 $150.00 220-739-001 $150.00 220-739-002 $150.00 220-739-003 $150.00 220-739-004 $150.00 220-741-001 $150.00 220-741-002 $150.00 220-741-003 $150.00 220-741-004 $150.00 220-741-005 $150.00 220-741-006 $150.00 220-741-007 $150.00 220-741-008 $150.00 220-741-011 $150.00 220-741-012 $150.00 220-741-013 $150.00 220-741-014 $150.00 220-741-015 $150.00 220-741-016 $150.00 220-741-017 $150.00 220-741-018 $150.00 220-741-019 $150.00 220-741-020 $150.00 220-741-021 $150.00 220-741-022 $150.00 220-741-023 $150.00 220-741-024 $150.00 220-741-025 $150.00 220-741-026 $150.00 220-741-027 $150.00 220-741-028 $150.00 220-741-029 $150.00 220-741-030 $150.00 220-741-031 $150.00 220-741-032 $150.00 220-741-033 $150.00 220-741-034 $150.00 220-741-035 $150.00 220-741-036 $150.00 220-741-037 $150.00 220-741-038 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-741-039 $150.00 220-741-040 $150.00 220-741-041 $150.00 220-741-042 $150.00 220-741-043 $150.00 220-741-044 $150.00 220-741-045 $150.00 220-741-046 $150.00 220-741-047 $150.00 220-741-054 $150.00 220-741-056 $150.00 220-741-057 $150.00 220-741-058 $150.00 220-741-059 $150.00 220-741-060 $150.00 220-741-061 $150.00 220-741-062 $150.00 220-741-063 $150.00 220-742-001 $150.00 220-742-002 $150.00 220-742-003 $150.00 220-742-004 $150.00 220-742-005 $150.00 220-742-006 $150.00 220-742-007 $150.00 220-742-008 $150.00 220-742-009 $150.00 220-742-010 $150.00 220-742-011 $150.00 220-742-012 $150.00 220-742-013 $150.00 220-742-014 $150.00 220-742-015 $150.00 220-742-016 $150.00 220-742-017 $150.00 220-742-018 $150.00 220-742-019 $150.00 220-830-001 $150.00 220-830-002 $150.00 220-830-003 $150.00 220-830-004 $150.00 220-830-005 $150.00 220-830-006 $150.00 220-830-007 $150.00 220-830-008 $150.00 220-830-009 $150.00 220-830-010 $150.00 220-830-011 $150.00 220-830-012 $150.00 220-830-013 $150.00 220-830-014 $150.00 220-830-015 $150.00 220-830-016 $150.00 220-830-017 $150.00 220-830-018 $150.00 220-830-019 $150.00 16 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 17 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2844 LQ LEVY CODE: Shadow Creek - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-830-020 $150.00 220-830-021 $150.00 220-830-022 $150.00 220-830-023 $150.00 220-830-024 $150.00 220-830-025 $150.00 220-830-026 $150.00 220-830-027 $150.00 220-830-028 $150.00 220-830-029 $150.00 220-830-030 $150.00 220-830-031 $150.00 220-830-032 $150.00 220-830-033 $150.00 220-830-034 $150.00 220-830-035 $150.00 220-830-036 $150.00 220-840-001 $150.00 220-840-002 $150.00 220-840-003 $150.00 220-840-004 $150.00 220-840-005 $150.00 220-840-006 $150.00 220-840-007 $150.00 220-840-008 $150.00 220-840-009 $150.00 220-840-010 $150.00 220-840-011 $150.00 220-840-012 $150.00 477Total Parcels: $71,550.00 Total Assessment: 17 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 18 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2843 MW LEVY CODE: Pacheco Manor Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 125-155-029 $175.94 125-155-030 $175.94 125-155-031 $175.94 125-155-032 $175.94 125-155-033 $175.94 125-155-034 $175.94 125-155-035 $175.94 125-155-036 $175.94 125-155-037 $175.94 125-155-038 $175.94 125-155-039 $175.94 125-155-040 $175.94 125-155-041 $175.94 125-155-042 $175.94 125-155-043 $175.94 125-155-044 $175.94 125-155-045 $175.94 125-155-046 $175.94 125-155-047 $175.94 125-155-048 $175.94 125-155-049 $175.94 125-155-050 $175.94 22Total Parcels: $3,870.68 Total Assessment: 18 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 19 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2849 MI LEVY CODE: Hidden Pond - Reliez Valley Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 365-470-001 $200.00 365-470-002 $200.00 365-470-003 $200.00 365-470-004 $200.00 365-470-005 $200.00 365-470-006 $200.00 365-470-007 $200.00 365-470-008 $200.00 365-470-009 $200.00 365-470-010 $200.00 365-470-011 $200.00 365-470-012 $200.00 365-470-013 $200.00 365-470-014 $200.00 365-470-015 $200.00 365-470-016 $200.00 365-470-017 $200.00 365-470-018 $200.00 365-470-019 $200.00 365-470-020 $200.00 365-470-021 $200.00 365-470-022 $200.00 365-470-023 $200.00 365-470-024 $200.00 365-470-025 $200.00 365-470-026 $200.00 365-470-027 $200.00 365-490-001 $200.00 365-490-002 $200.00 365-490-003 $200.00 365-490-004 $200.00 365-490-005 $200.00 365-490-006 $200.00 365-490-007 $200.00 365-490-008 $200.00 365-490-009 $200.00 365-490-010 $200.00 365-490-011 $200.00 365-490-012 $200.00 365-490-013 $200.00 365-490-014 $200.00 365-490-015 $200.00 365-490-016 $200.00 365-490-018 $200.00 365-490-019 $200.00 365-490-020 $200.00 365-490-021 $200.00 365-490-025 $200.00 365-500-001 $200.00 365-500-002 $200.00 365-500-003 $200.00 365-500-004 $200.00 365-500-005 $200.00 365-500-006 $200.00 365-500-007 $200.00 365-500-008 $200.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 365-500-009 $200.00 365-500-010 $200.00 365-500-011 $200.00 365-500-012 $200.00 365-500-013 $200.00 365-500-014 $200.00 365-500-015 $200.00 365-500-016 $200.00 365-500-017 $200.00 365-500-018 $200.00 365-500-019 $200.00 365-500-020 $200.00 365-500-021 $200.00 365-510-001 $200.00 365-510-002 $200.00 365-510-003 $200.00 365-510-004 $200.00 365-510-005 $200.00 365-510-006 $200.00 365-510-007 $200.00 365-510-008 $200.00 365-510-009 $200.00 365-510-010 $200.00 365-510-011 $200.00 365-510-012 $200.00 365-510-013 $200.00 365-520-001 $200.00 365-520-002 $200.00 365-520-003 $200.00 365-520-004 $200.00 365-520-005 $200.00 365-520-006 $200.00 365-520-007 $200.00 365-520-008 $200.00 365-520-009 $200.00 365-520-010 $200.00 365-520-011 $200.00 365-520-012 $200.00 365-520-013 $200.00 365-520-014 $200.00 365-520-015 $200.00 365-520-016 $200.00 365-520-017 $200.00 365-520-018 $200.00 365-520-019 $200.00 365-520-020 $200.00 365-520-021 $200.00 365-520-022 $200.00 365-520-023 $200.00 365-520-024 $200.00 365-520-025 $200.00 365-520-026 $200.00 365-530-001 $200.00 365-530-002 $200.00 365-530-003 $200.00 365-530-004 $200.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 365-530-005 $200.00 365-530-006 $200.00 365-530-007 $200.00 365-530-008 $200.00 365-530-009 $200.00 365-530-010 $200.00 365-530-011 $200.00 365-530-012 $200.00 365-530-013 $200.00 365-530-014 $200.00 365-530-015 $200.00 365-530-016 $200.00 365-530-017 $200.00 365-530-018 $200.00 365-530-019 $200.00 365-530-020 $200.00 365-530-021 $200.00 365-530-022 $200.00 130Total Parcels: $26,000.00 Total Assessment: 19 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-011-002 $13.66 570-011-003 $13.66 570-011-004 $13.66 570-011-005 $13.66 570-011-006 $13.66 570-011-007 $13.66 570-011-008 $13.66 570-011-009 $13.66 570-011-010 $13.66 570-011-011 $13.66 570-011-012 $13.66 570-011-013 $13.66 570-011-014 $13.66 570-012-001 $13.66 570-012-002 $13.66 570-012-003 $13.66 570-012-004 $13.66 570-012-005 $13.66 570-012-008 $13.66 570-012-009 $13.66 570-012-010 $13.66 570-012-011 $13.66 570-012-012 $13.66 570-012-013 $13.66 570-012-014 $13.66 570-012-015 $13.66 570-012-016 $13.66 570-020-001 $13.66 570-020-002 $13.66 570-020-003 $13.66 570-020-004 $13.66 570-020-005 $13.66 570-020-006 $13.66 570-020-007 $6.82 570-020-010 $13.66 570-020-011 $13.66 570-020-012 $13.66 570-020-013 $13.66 570-020-014 $13.66 570-020-015 $13.66 570-031-001 $13.66 570-031-002 $13.66 570-031-003 $13.66 570-031-004 $13.66 570-031-005 $13.66 570-031-006 $13.66 570-031-007 $13.66 570-031-008 $13.66 570-031-009 $13.66 570-031-010 $13.66 570-031-011 $13.66 570-031-012 $13.66 570-031-013 $13.66 570-031-014 $13.66 570-032-001 $13.66 570-032-002 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-032-003 $13.66 570-032-004 $13.66 570-032-005 $13.66 570-032-006 $13.66 570-032-007 $13.66 570-032-008 $13.66 570-032-009 $13.66 570-032-010 $13.66 570-032-011 $13.66 570-032-012 $13.66 570-032-013 $13.66 570-032-014 $13.66 570-032-015 $13.66 570-032-016 $13.66 570-032-017 $13.66 570-032-018 $13.66 570-032-019 $13.66 570-032-020 $13.66 570-032-021 $13.66 570-032-022 $13.66 570-032-023 $13.66 570-032-024 $13.66 570-032-025 $13.66 570-032-026 $13.66 570-032-027 $13.66 570-032-028 $13.66 570-032-029 $13.66 570-032-030 $13.66 570-032-031 $13.66 570-041-001 $13.66 570-041-002 $13.66 570-041-003 $13.66 570-041-004 $13.66 570-041-005 $13.66 570-041-006 $13.66 570-041-007 $13.66 570-041-008 $13.66 570-041-009 $13.66 570-041-010 $13.66 570-041-011 $13.66 570-041-012 $13.66 570-041-013 $13.66 570-041-014 $13.66 570-041-015 $13.66 570-041-016 $13.66 570-041-017 $13.66 570-041-018 $13.66 570-041-019 $13.66 570-041-021 $13.66 570-041-022 $13.66 570-041-023 $13.66 570-041-024 $13.66 570-041-025 $13.66 570-042-001 $13.66 570-042-002 $13.66 570-042-003 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-042-004 $13.66 570-042-005 $13.66 570-042-006 $13.66 570-042-007 $13.66 570-042-008 $13.66 570-042-009 $13.66 570-042-010 $13.66 570-042-011 $13.66 570-042-012 $13.66 570-042-013 $13.66 570-042-014 $13.66 570-042-015 $13.66 570-042-016 $13.66 570-042-017 $13.66 570-042-018 $13.66 570-042-019 $13.66 570-042-020 $13.66 570-042-021 $13.66 570-050-001 $13.66 570-050-002 $13.66 570-050-003 $13.66 570-050-004 $13.66 570-050-005 $13.66 570-050-006 $13.66 570-050-007 $13.66 570-050-008 $13.66 570-050-009 $13.66 570-050-010 $13.66 570-050-011 $13.66 570-050-012 $13.66 570-050-013 $13.66 570-050-014 $13.66 570-050-017 $13.66 570-050-018 $13.66 570-050-019 $13.66 570-050-020 $13.66 570-050-022 $13.66 570-050-023 $13.66 570-050-024 $13.66 570-050-025 $13.66 570-050-026 $13.66 570-050-027 $13.66 570-060-001 $13.66 570-060-002 $13.66 570-060-003 $13.66 570-060-004 $13.66 570-060-005 $13.66 570-060-006 $13.66 570-060-007 $13.66 570-060-008 $13.66 570-060-009 $13.66 570-060-010 $13.66 570-060-011 $13.66 570-060-012 $13.66 570-060-013 $13.66 570-060-014 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-060-017 $13.66 570-060-018 $13.66 570-060-019 $13.66 570-060-020 $13.66 570-060-021 $13.66 570-060-022 $13.66 570-060-023 $13.66 570-071-001 $13.66 570-071-002 $13.66 570-071-003 $13.66 570-071-004 $13.66 570-071-005 $13.66 570-071-006 $13.66 570-071-007 $13.66 570-071-008 $13.66 570-071-009 $13.66 570-071-010 $13.66 570-072-001 $13.66 570-072-002 $13.66 570-072-003 $13.66 570-072-004 $13.66 570-072-005 $13.66 570-072-006 $13.66 570-072-007 $13.66 570-072-008 $13.66 570-072-009 $13.66 570-072-010 $13.66 570-072-011 $13.66 570-072-012 $13.66 570-072-013 $13.66 570-072-014 $13.66 570-081-001 $13.66 570-081-002 $13.66 570-081-003 $13.66 570-081-004 $13.66 570-081-005 $13.66 570-081-007 $13.66 570-081-008 $13.66 570-081-009 $13.66 570-081-010 $13.66 570-081-011 $13.66 570-081-012 $13.66 570-081-013 $13.66 570-082-001 $13.66 570-082-002 $13.66 570-082-003 $13.66 570-082-004 $13.66 570-082-005 $13.66 570-082-006 $13.66 570-082-007 $13.66 570-082-008 $13.66 570-082-009 $13.66 570-082-010 $13.66 570-082-011 $13.66 570-082-012 $13.66 570-082-013 $13.66 20 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-082-014 $13.66 570-082-015 $13.66 570-082-016 $13.66 570-091-001 $13.66 570-091-002 $13.66 570-091-003 $13.66 570-091-004 $13.66 570-091-005 $13.66 570-091-006 $13.66 570-091-007 $13.66 570-092-001 $13.66 570-092-002 $13.66 570-092-003 $13.66 570-092-004 $13.66 570-092-005 $13.66 570-092-006 $13.66 570-092-007 $13.66 570-092-008 $13.66 570-092-009 $13.66 570-092-010 $13.66 570-092-011 $13.66 570-092-012 $13.66 570-092-013 $13.66 570-092-014 $13.66 570-093-001 $13.66 570-093-002 $13.66 570-093-003 $13.66 570-093-004 $13.66 570-093-005 $13.66 570-093-006 $13.66 570-093-007 $13.66 570-093-008 $13.66 570-093-009 $13.66 570-093-010 $13.66 570-093-011 $13.66 570-093-012 $13.66 570-093-013 $13.66 570-100-002 $6.82 570-100-003 $13.66 570-100-005 $13.66 570-100-008 $13.66 570-100-009 $13.66 570-100-010 $13.66 570-100-011 $13.66 570-100-012 $13.66 570-100-013 $13.66 570-100-014 $13.66 570-100-015 $13.66 570-100-016 $13.66 570-100-017 $13.66 570-100-018 $13.66 570-100-019 $13.66 570-100-020 $13.66 570-100-022 $13.66 570-100-023 $13.66 570-100-024 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-110-001 $13.66 570-110-002 $13.66 570-110-003 $13.66 570-110-004 $13.66 570-110-005 $13.66 570-110-006 $13.66 570-110-007 $13.66 570-110-008 $13.66 570-110-009 $13.66 570-110-010 $13.66 570-110-011 $13.66 570-110-012 $13.66 570-110-013 $13.66 570-110-014 $13.66 570-110-015 $13.66 570-110-016 $13.66 570-121-001 $13.66 570-121-002 $13.66 570-121-003 $13.66 570-121-004 $13.66 570-121-005 $13.66 570-121-006 $13.66 570-121-007 $13.66 570-121-008 $13.66 570-121-009 $13.66 570-121-010 $13.66 570-121-011 $13.66 570-121-014 $13.66 570-121-015 $13.66 570-121-016 $13.66 570-121-017 $13.66 570-121-018 $13.66 570-121-019 $13.66 570-121-020 $13.66 570-122-001 $13.66 570-122-002 $13.66 570-122-003 $13.66 570-122-004 $13.66 570-122-005 $13.66 570-122-011 $13.66 570-122-012 $13.66 570-122-013 $13.66 570-122-014 $13.66 570-122-015 $13.66 570-122-020 $13.66 570-122-025 $13.66 570-130-002 $13.66 570-130-003 $13.66 570-130-004 $13.66 570-130-005 $13.66 570-130-006 $13.66 570-130-007 $13.66 570-130-008 $13.66 570-130-009 $13.66 570-130-010 $13.66 570-130-011 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-130-012 $13.66 570-130-013 $13.66 570-130-014 $13.66 570-130-015 $13.66 570-130-016 $13.66 570-130-017 $13.66 570-130-018 $13.66 570-130-019 $13.66 570-130-020 $13.66 570-130-021 $13.66 570-130-022 $13.66 570-130-023 $13.66 570-130-024 $13.66 570-130-025 $13.66 570-130-027 $13.66 570-130-031 $6.82 570-130-032 $13.66 570-130-033 $13.66 570-141-001 $13.66 570-141-002 $13.66 570-141-003 $13.66 570-141-004 $13.66 570-141-005 $13.66 570-141-006 $13.66 570-142-001 $13.66 570-142-002 $13.66 570-142-003 $13.66 570-142-004 $13.66 570-142-005 $13.66 570-142-006 $13.66 570-142-007 $13.66 570-142-008 $13.66 570-142-009 $13.66 570-142-010 $13.66 570-142-011 $13.66 570-142-012 $13.66 570-142-013 $13.66 570-142-014 $13.66 570-142-015 $13.66 570-142-016 $13.66 570-142-017 $13.66 570-142-019 $13.66 570-142-020 $13.66 570-142-023 $13.66 570-142-024 $13.66 570-142-025 $13.66 570-142-026 $13.66 570-142-027 $13.66 570-142-028 $13.66 570-142-029 $13.66 570-151-001 $13.66 570-151-002 $13.66 570-151-003 $13.66 570-151-004 $13.66 570-151-005 $13.66 570-151-006 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-151-007 $13.66 570-151-008 $13.66 570-151-009 $13.66 570-151-010 $13.66 570-151-011 $13.66 570-151-012 $13.66 570-151-013 $13.66 570-151-014 $13.66 570-151-015 $13.66 570-151-016 $13.66 570-151-017 $13.66 570-151-018 $13.66 570-151-019 $13.66 570-151-020 $13.66 570-151-021 $13.66 570-151-022 $13.66 570-151-023 $13.66 570-151-024 $13.66 570-151-025 $13.66 570-151-026 $13.66 570-151-027 $13.66 570-151-028 $13.66 570-151-029 $13.66 570-152-001 $13.66 570-152-002 $13.66 570-152-003 $13.66 570-152-004 $13.66 570-152-005 $13.66 570-152-006 $13.66 570-152-007 $13.66 570-152-008 $13.66 570-152-009 $13.66 570-152-010 $13.66 570-152-011 $13.66 570-152-012 $13.66 570-152-013 $13.66 570-152-014 $13.66 570-152-015 $13.66 570-152-016 $13.66 570-152-017 $13.66 570-161-001 $13.66 570-161-002 $13.66 570-161-003 $13.66 570-161-004 $13.66 570-161-008 $13.66 570-161-009 $6.82 570-162-001 $13.66 570-162-002 $13.66 570-162-003 $13.66 570-162-004 $13.66 570-162-005 $13.66 570-162-006 $13.66 570-162-007 $13.66 570-162-008 $13.66 570-162-009 $13.66 570-162-010 $13.66 21 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-162-011 $13.66 570-162-012 $13.66 570-162-013 $13.66 570-162-014 $13.66 570-162-015 $13.66 570-162-016 $13.66 570-162-017 $13.66 570-162-018 $13.66 570-162-019 $13.66 570-162-020 $13.66 570-162-021 $13.66 570-162-022 $13.66 570-162-023 $13.66 570-162-024 $13.66 570-162-025 $13.66 570-162-026 $13.66 570-162-027 $13.66 570-162-028 $13.66 570-171-001 $13.66 570-171-002 $13.66 570-171-003 $13.66 570-171-004 $13.66 570-171-005 $13.66 570-171-006 $13.66 570-171-007 $13.66 570-171-008 $13.66 570-171-009 $13.66 570-171-010 $13.66 570-171-011 $13.66 570-171-012 $13.66 570-171-013 $13.66 570-171-014 $13.66 570-171-015 $13.66 570-171-016 $13.66 570-172-001 $13.66 570-172-002 $13.66 570-172-003 $13.66 570-172-004 $13.66 570-172-005 $13.66 570-172-006 $13.66 570-172-007 $13.66 570-172-008 $13.66 570-172-009 $13.66 570-172-010 $13.66 570-172-011 $13.66 570-172-012 $13.66 570-172-013 $13.66 570-172-014 $13.66 570-173-002 $13.66 570-173-003 $13.66 570-173-004 $13.66 570-173-005 $13.66 570-173-006 $13.66 570-173-007 $13.66 570-173-008 $13.66 570-173-009 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-180-001 $13.66 570-180-002 $13.66 570-180-003 $13.66 570-180-004 $13.66 570-180-005 $13.66 570-180-006 $13.66 570-180-007 $13.66 570-180-008 $13.66 570-180-009 $13.66 570-180-010 $13.66 570-180-011 $13.66 570-180-012 $13.66 570-180-013 $13.66 570-180-014 $13.66 570-180-015 $13.66 570-180-016 $13.66 570-180-017 $13.66 570-180-018 $13.66 570-180-019 $13.66 570-180-020 $13.66 570-180-021 $13.66 570-180-022 $13.66 570-180-023 $13.66 570-180-024 $13.66 570-180-025 $13.66 570-180-027 $13.66 570-180-028 $13.66 570-191-001 $13.66 570-191-002 $13.66 570-191-003 $13.66 570-191-004 $13.66 570-191-005 $13.66 570-191-006 $13.66 570-191-007 $13.66 570-191-009 $13.66 570-191-010 $13.66 570-191-011 $13.66 570-191-012 $13.66 570-191-013 $13.66 570-191-014 $13.66 570-192-001 $13.66 570-192-002 $13.66 570-192-003 $13.66 570-192-004 $13.66 570-192-005 $13.66 570-192-006 $13.66 570-192-007 $13.66 570-192-008 $13.66 570-192-009 $13.66 570-192-010 $13.66 570-192-011 $13.66 570-192-012 $13.66 570-192-013 $13.66 570-192-014 $13.66 570-192-015 $13.66 570-192-016 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-192-017 $13.66 570-192-018 $13.66 570-192-019 $13.66 570-192-020 $13.66 570-192-021 $13.66 570-192-022 $13.66 570-192-023 $13.66 570-192-024 $13.66 570-192-025 $13.66 570-192-026 $13.66 570-192-027 $13.66 570-201-001 $13.66 570-201-002 $13.66 570-201-003 $13.66 570-201-004 $13.66 570-201-005 $13.66 570-201-006 $13.66 570-201-007 $13.66 570-201-008 $13.66 570-202-002 $13.66 570-202-003 $13.66 570-202-004 $13.66 570-202-005 $13.66 570-203-001 $13.66 570-203-002 $13.66 570-203-003 $13.66 570-203-004 $13.66 570-203-005 $13.66 570-203-006 $13.66 570-203-007 $13.66 570-203-008 $13.66 570-203-009 $13.66 570-203-010 $13.66 570-203-011 $13.66 570-203-012 $13.66 570-203-013 $13.66 570-203-014 $13.66 570-221-001 $13.66 570-221-002 $13.66 570-221-003 $13.66 570-221-004 $13.66 570-221-005 $13.66 570-221-006 $13.66 570-221-007 $13.66 570-221-008 $13.66 570-221-009 $13.66 570-221-010 $13.66 570-221-011 $13.66 570-221-012 $13.66 570-221-013 $13.66 570-221-014 $13.66 570-221-015 $13.66 570-222-001 $13.66 570-222-002 $13.66 570-222-003 $13.66 570-222-004 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-222-005 $13.66 570-222-006 $13.66 570-222-007 $13.66 570-222-008 $13.66 570-222-009 $13.66 570-222-010 $13.66 570-222-011 $13.66 570-222-012 $13.66 570-222-013 $13.66 570-222-014 $13.66 570-222-015 $13.66 570-222-016 $13.66 570-222-017 $13.66 570-222-018 $13.66 570-222-019 $13.66 570-222-020 $13.66 570-222-021 $13.66 570-222-022 $13.66 570-222-023 $13.66 570-222-024 $13.66 570-222-025 $13.66 570-222-026 $13.66 570-222-027 $13.66 570-223-001 $13.66 570-223-002 $13.66 570-223-003 $13.66 570-223-004 $13.66 570-223-005 $13.66 570-223-006 $13.66 570-231-001 $13.66 570-231-002 $13.66 570-231-003 $13.66 570-231-004 $13.66 570-231-005 $13.66 570-231-006 $13.66 570-231-007 $13.66 570-231-008 $13.66 570-231-009 $13.66 570-231-010 $13.66 570-231-011 $13.66 570-231-012 $13.66 570-231-013 $13.66 570-231-014 $13.66 570-231-015 $13.66 570-231-018 $13.66 570-231-019 $13.66 570-232-001 $13.66 570-232-002 $13.66 570-232-003 $13.66 570-232-004 $13.66 570-232-005 $13.66 570-232-006 $13.66 570-232-007 $13.66 570-232-008 $13.66 570-232-009 $13.66 570-232-010 $13.66 22 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-232-011 $13.66 570-232-012 $13.66 570-240-003 $13.66 570-251-006 $13.66 570-251-007 $13.66 570-251-008 $13.66 570-251-009 $13.66 570-251-010 $13.66 570-251-011 $13.66 570-251-012 $13.66 570-251-015 $13.66 570-251-016 $13.66 570-251-017 $13.66 570-251-018 $6.82 570-251-020 $6.82 570-251-021 $6.82 570-252-002 $13.66 570-252-003 $13.66 570-252-004 $13.66 570-252-005 $13.66 570-252-006 $13.66 570-252-007 $13.66 570-252-008 $13.66 570-252-009 $13.66 570-252-010 $13.66 570-252-011 $13.66 570-252-012 $13.66 570-252-013 $13.66 570-252-014 $13.66 570-252-015 $13.66 570-252-016 $13.66 570-252-017 $13.66 570-252-018 $13.66 570-252-019 $13.66 570-252-020 $13.66 570-252-021 $13.66 570-252-022 $13.66 570-252-023 $13.66 570-252-024 $13.66 570-252-025 $13.66 570-252-026 $13.66 570-252-027 $13.66 570-252-028 $13.66 570-252-029 $13.66 570-252-030 $13.66 570-252-031 $13.66 570-253-004 $6.82 570-253-005 $6.82 570-253-006 $6.82 570-253-010 $13.66 570-253-011 $13.66 570-253-012 $6.82 570-253-013 $13.66 570-253-014 $13.66 570-253-015 $13.66 570-253-016 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 570-253-017 $13.66 570-253-018 $13.66 570-253-019 $13.66 570-253-020 $13.66 570-253-021 $13.66 570-253-022 $13.66 570-253-023 $6.82 570-253-024 $6.82 570-253-025 $6.82 570-253-026 $13.66 570-253-028 $13.66 570-253-029 $13.66 570-253-031 $13.66 570-253-032 $13.66 570-253-033 $13.66 570-253-034 $13.66 570-253-035 $13.66 570-253-036 $13.66 570-253-037 $6.82 570-261-001 $13.66 570-261-002 $13.66 570-261-003 $13.66 570-262-013 $13.66 570-262-014 $13.66 570-262-015 $13.66 570-262-020 $13.66 570-262-021 $13.66 570-262-022 $13.66 570-262-025 $13.66 570-262-026 $13.66 570-262-029 $13.66 570-262-030 $13.66 570-262-032 $13.66 570-262-033 $13.66 570-262-034 $13.66 570-262-035 $13.66 570-262-036 $13.66 570-262-037 $13.66 570-262-038 $13.66 571-010-001 $13.66 571-010-002 $13.66 571-010-003 $13.66 571-010-004 $13.66 571-010-005 $13.66 571-010-006 $13.66 571-010-007 $13.66 571-010-008 $13.66 571-010-009 $13.66 571-010-010 $13.66 571-010-012 $13.66 571-010-013 $13.66 571-010-014 $13.66 571-010-015 $13.66 571-010-016 $13.66 571-010-017 $13.66 571-010-018 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-010-019 $13.66 571-010-020 $13.66 571-010-021 $13.66 571-010-022 $13.66 571-010-023 $13.66 571-021-001 $13.66 571-021-002 $13.66 571-021-003 $13.66 571-021-004 $13.66 571-021-005 $13.66 571-021-006 $13.66 571-021-007 $13.66 571-021-008 $13.66 571-021-010 $13.66 571-021-011 $13.66 571-021-014 $13.66 571-021-015 $13.66 571-021-016 $13.66 571-021-017 $13.66 571-021-018 $13.66 571-021-019 $13.66 571-021-020 $13.66 571-021-021 $13.66 571-021-022 $13.66 571-021-023 $13.66 571-021-024 $13.66 571-021-026 $13.66 571-021-030 $13.66 571-021-032 $13.66 571-021-033 $13.66 571-021-034 $13.66 571-022-001 $13.66 571-022-003 $13.66 571-022-004 $13.66 571-022-005 $13.66 571-022-006 $13.66 571-022-007 $13.66 571-022-008 $13.66 571-022-009 $13.66 571-022-010 $13.66 571-022-011 $13.66 571-022-012 $13.66 571-022-013 $13.66 571-030-001 $13.66 571-030-002 $13.66 571-030-003 $13.66 571-030-005 $13.66 571-030-006 $13.66 571-030-007 $13.66 571-030-008 $13.66 571-030-009 $13.66 571-030-010 $13.66 571-030-011 $13.66 571-030-012 $13.66 571-030-013 $13.66 571-030-014 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-030-015 $13.66 571-030-017 $13.66 571-030-018 $13.66 571-030-019 $6.82 571-040-001 $13.66 571-040-002 $13.66 571-040-003 $13.66 571-040-004 $13.66 571-040-005 $13.66 571-040-006 $13.66 571-040-007 $13.66 571-040-008 $13.66 571-040-011 $13.66 571-040-012 $13.66 571-050-002 $13.66 571-050-003 $13.66 571-050-009 $13.66 571-050-011 $13.66 571-050-012 $13.66 571-050-013 $13.66 571-050-014 $13.66 571-050-015 $13.66 571-050-017 $13.66 571-050-018 $13.66 571-050-019 $13.66 571-050-021 $13.66 571-050-022 $13.66 571-050-023 $40.98 571-060-002 $13.66 571-060-003 $13.66 571-060-004 $27.32 571-060-005 $13.66 571-060-006 $13.66 571-060-007 $20.48 571-060-008 $20.48 571-060-009 $13.66 571-060-010 $13.66 571-060-011 $13.66 571-070-001 $13.66 571-070-002 $13.66 571-070-003 $13.66 571-070-006 $13.66 571-070-009 $13.66 571-070-010 $6.82 571-070-011 $13.66 571-070-012 $13.66 571-070-013 $13.66 571-070-014 $13.66 571-070-015 $13.66 571-070-016 $13.66 571-070-017 $6.82 571-070-018 $13.66 571-070-019 $13.66 571-080-001 $13.66 571-080-002 $13.66 571-080-003 $13.66 23 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-080-004 $13.66 571-080-006 $13.66 571-080-007 $13.66 571-080-008 $13.66 571-080-009 $13.66 571-080-010 $13.66 571-080-011 $13.66 571-080-012 $13.66 571-080-013 $13.66 571-080-014 $13.66 571-080-015 $13.66 571-080-016 $13.66 571-080-017 $13.66 571-080-018 $13.66 571-080-019 $13.66 571-080-020 $13.66 571-080-021 $13.66 571-080-022 $13.66 571-080-025 $13.66 571-090-001 $13.66 571-090-002 $13.66 571-090-003 $13.66 571-090-004 $13.66 571-090-005 $13.66 571-090-006 $13.66 571-090-007 $6.82 571-090-008 $13.66 571-090-011 $13.66 571-090-012 $13.66 571-090-013 $13.66 571-090-014 $13.66 571-090-015 $13.66 571-090-016 $13.66 571-090-017 $13.66 571-090-019 $13.66 571-100-001 $13.66 571-100-002 $13.66 571-100-003 $13.66 571-100-004 $13.66 571-100-005 $13.66 571-100-006 $13.66 571-100-007 $13.66 571-100-008 $13.66 571-100-009 $13.66 571-100-010 $13.66 571-100-011 $13.66 571-100-012 $13.66 571-100-013 $13.66 571-100-014 $13.66 571-100-015 $13.66 571-100-016 $13.66 571-100-017 $13.66 571-110-001 $13.66 571-110-002 $13.66 571-110-003 $13.66 571-110-004 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-110-007 $13.66 571-110-008 $13.66 571-110-009 $13.66 571-110-010 $13.66 571-110-011 $13.66 571-110-012 $13.66 571-110-013 $13.66 571-110-014 $13.66 571-110-015 $13.66 571-110-016 $13.66 571-110-017 $13.66 571-110-019 $13.66 571-110-020 $13.66 571-110-021 $13.66 571-120-001 $13.66 571-120-002 $13.66 571-120-003 $13.66 571-120-005 $13.66 571-120-006 $13.66 571-120-007 $13.66 571-120-008 $13.66 571-120-010 $13.66 571-120-011 $13.66 571-120-012 $13.66 571-120-013 $13.66 571-120-014 $13.66 571-120-015 $13.66 571-120-016 $13.66 571-120-017 $13.66 571-120-018 $13.66 571-120-019 $13.66 571-120-020 $13.66 571-120-021 $13.66 571-120-022 $13.66 571-120-023 $13.66 571-120-024 $13.66 571-120-025 $13.66 571-120-026 $13.66 571-120-027 $13.66 571-120-028 $13.66 571-130-001 $13.66 571-130-002 $13.66 571-130-003 $13.66 571-130-004 $13.66 571-130-005 $13.66 571-130-006 $13.66 571-130-007 $13.66 571-130-008 $13.66 571-130-009 $13.66 571-130-010 $13.66 571-130-011 $13.66 571-130-012 $13.66 571-130-013 $13.66 571-130-014 $13.66 571-130-015 $13.66 571-130-016 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-130-017 $13.66 571-130-018 $13.66 571-130-019 $13.66 571-130-020 $20.48 571-130-021 $13.66 571-130-022 $13.66 571-130-023 $13.66 571-130-024 $13.66 571-130-025 $13.66 571-140-001 $13.66 571-140-002 $13.66 571-140-003 $13.66 571-140-004 $13.66 571-140-005 $13.66 571-140-006 $13.66 571-140-007 $13.66 571-140-008 $13.66 571-140-009 $13.66 571-140-010 $13.66 571-140-011 $13.66 571-140-012 $13.66 571-140-013 $13.66 571-140-014 $13.66 571-140-015 $13.66 571-140-016 $13.66 571-140-017 $13.66 571-140-018 $13.66 571-140-022 $13.66 571-140-023 $13.66 571-140-024 $13.66 571-140-025 $13.66 571-140-026 $13.66 571-140-031 $13.66 571-140-032 $13.66 571-150-001 $13.66 571-150-002 $13.66 571-150-003 $13.66 571-150-005 $13.66 571-150-008 $13.66 571-150-010 $13.66 571-150-011 $13.66 571-150-012 $13.66 571-150-013 $13.66 571-150-015 $6.82 571-150-017 $13.66 571-150-019 $13.66 571-150-020 $13.66 571-150-021 $13.66 571-150-022 $13.66 571-150-023 $6.82 571-160-001 $13.66 571-160-002 $13.66 571-160-003 $13.66 571-160-004 $13.66 571-160-006 $13.66 571-160-012 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-160-013 $13.66 571-160-014 $13.66 571-160-017 $13.66 571-160-019 $6.82 571-160-020 $13.66 571-170-001 $13.66 571-170-002 $13.66 571-170-004 $13.66 571-170-005 $13.66 571-170-006 $13.66 571-170-007 $13.66 571-170-008 $13.66 571-170-010 $13.66 571-170-014 $13.66 571-170-015 $13.66 571-170-016 $13.66 571-170-017 $13.66 571-170-022 $13.66 571-170-023 $13.66 571-170-031 $13.66 571-170-032 $13.66 571-170-034 $13.66 571-170-035 $13.66 571-170-036 $13.66 571-170-037 $6.82 571-170-038 $13.66 571-180-001 $13.66 571-180-002 $13.66 571-180-003 $13.66 571-180-004 $13.66 571-180-005 $13.66 571-180-006 $13.66 571-180-007 $13.66 571-180-009 $13.66 571-180-010 $13.66 571-180-011 $13.66 571-180-012 $13.66 571-180-013 $13.66 571-180-014 $13.66 571-180-017 $13.66 571-190-001 $13.66 571-190-002 $13.66 571-190-003 $13.66 571-190-004 $13.66 571-190-006 $13.66 571-190-007 $13.66 571-190-008 $20.48 571-190-009 $13.66 571-190-010 $13.66 571-190-011 $13.66 571-190-012 $13.66 571-190-013 $13.66 571-190-014 $13.66 571-190-015 $13.66 571-190-016 $13.66 571-190-018 $13.66 24 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-190-019 $13.66 571-200-001 $13.66 571-200-002 $13.66 571-200-003 $13.66 571-200-004 $13.66 571-200-005 $13.66 571-200-006 $13.66 571-200-007 $13.66 571-200-008 $13.66 571-200-009 $13.66 571-200-010 $13.66 571-200-011 $13.66 571-200-012 $13.66 571-200-013 $13.66 571-200-014 $13.66 571-200-015 $13.66 571-200-016 $13.66 571-200-017 $13.66 571-211-004 $13.66 571-211-005 $13.66 571-211-006 $13.66 571-211-007 $13.66 571-211-008 $13.66 571-211-009 $13.66 571-211-011 $13.66 571-211-012 $13.66 571-211-013 $20.48 571-212-001 $13.66 571-212-002 $13.66 571-212-004 $13.66 571-212-005 $13.66 571-212-006 $13.66 571-212-007 $13.66 571-212-008 $13.66 571-212-009 $13.66 571-212-010 $13.66 571-212-011 $13.66 571-221-001 $13.66 571-221-002 $13.66 571-221-004 $13.66 571-221-005 $13.66 571-221-006 $13.66 571-221-007 $13.66 571-221-008 $13.66 571-221-009 $13.66 571-221-010 $13.66 571-221-011 $13.66 571-221-012 $13.66 571-222-001 $13.66 571-222-002 $13.66 571-222-003 $13.66 571-222-004 $13.66 571-222-005 $13.66 571-231-001 $13.66 571-231-002 $13.66 571-231-003 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-231-004 $13.66 571-231-005 $13.66 571-231-006 $13.66 571-232-001 $13.66 571-232-002 $13.66 571-232-003 $13.66 571-232-004 $13.66 571-232-005 $13.66 571-232-006 $13.66 571-240-001 $13.66 571-240-002 $13.66 571-240-003 $13.66 571-240-004 $13.66 571-240-005 $13.66 571-240-006 $13.66 571-240-007 $13.66 571-240-008 $13.66 571-240-009 $13.66 571-240-010 $13.66 571-240-011 $13.66 571-240-012 $13.66 571-240-013 $13.66 571-240-014 $13.66 571-240-018 $6.82 571-240-019 $13.66 571-240-022 $13.66 571-240-023 $13.66 571-240-024 $13.66 571-240-027 $13.66 571-250-003 $13.66 571-250-004 $13.66 571-250-005 $13.66 571-250-006 $13.66 571-250-007 $13.66 571-250-008 $13.66 571-250-009 $13.66 571-250-010 $13.66 571-250-013 $13.66 571-250-014 $13.66 571-250-015 $13.66 571-250-016 $13.66 571-250-017 $13.66 571-250-018 $13.66 571-250-019 $13.66 571-250-020 $13.66 571-250-021 $13.66 571-250-022 $13.66 571-250-023 $13.66 571-250-024 $13.66 571-250-025 $13.66 571-250-026 $13.66 571-250-027 $13.66 571-250-028 $13.66 571-250-029 $13.66 571-250-030 $13.66 571-250-031 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-250-032 $13.66 571-250-033 $13.66 571-250-034 $13.66 571-260-001 $13.66 571-260-002 $13.66 571-260-003 $13.66 571-260-004 $13.66 571-260-005 $13.66 571-260-006 $13.66 571-260-008 $13.66 571-260-013 $13.66 571-260-014 $13.66 571-260-015 $13.66 571-260-016 $13.66 571-270-001 $13.66 571-270-002 $13.66 571-270-003 $13.66 571-270-004 $13.66 571-270-005 $13.66 571-270-006 $13.66 571-270-007 $13.66 571-270-012 $13.66 571-270-013 $13.66 571-270-014 $13.66 571-270-015 $13.66 571-270-018 $13.66 571-270-019 $13.66 571-270-020 $13.66 571-270-021 $13.66 571-270-022 $13.66 571-270-023 $13.66 571-270-024 $13.66 571-270-025 $13.66 571-270-026 $13.66 571-270-027 $13.66 571-270-029 $13.66 571-270-030 $13.66 571-270-031 $13.66 571-270-032 $13.66 571-270-033 $13.66 571-280-002 $13.66 571-280-003 $13.66 571-280-004 $13.66 571-280-005 $13.66 571-280-008 $13.66 571-280-009 $13.66 571-280-010 $13.66 571-280-012 $13.66 571-280-013 $13.66 571-280-014 $13.66 571-280-015 $13.66 571-280-016 $13.66 571-280-017 $13.66 571-280-018 $13.66 571-280-019 $13.66 571-290-001 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-290-002 $13.66 571-290-003 $13.66 571-290-004 $13.66 571-290-005 $13.66 571-290-006 $13.66 571-290-007 $13.66 571-290-008 $13.66 571-290-009 $13.66 571-290-010 $13.66 571-290-011 $13.66 571-290-012 $13.66 571-290-013 $13.66 571-290-014 $13.66 571-290-015 $13.66 571-290-016 $13.66 571-290-017 $13.66 571-290-018 $13.66 571-290-019 $13.66 571-290-020 $13.66 571-300-001 $54.64 571-300-002 $13.66 571-300-003 $13.66 571-300-004 $13.66 571-300-005 $13.66 571-300-006 $13.66 571-300-007 $13.66 571-300-008 $13.66 571-300-009 $13.66 571-300-010 $13.66 571-300-011 $13.66 571-300-012 $13.66 571-300-013 $13.66 571-300-014 $13.66 571-300-015 $13.66 571-300-016 $13.66 571-300-017 $13.66 571-300-018 $13.66 571-300-019 $13.66 571-300-020 $13.66 571-300-021 $13.66 571-300-022 $13.66 571-300-023 $13.66 571-300-024 $13.66 571-300-025 $13.66 571-300-026 $13.66 571-300-027 $13.66 571-300-028 $13.66 571-300-029 $13.66 571-300-030 $13.66 571-300-031 $13.66 571-300-032 $13.66 571-311-001 $6.82 571-311-002 $13.66 571-311-003 $13.66 571-311-004 $13.66 571-311-005 $13.66 25 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-311-006 $13.66 571-311-007 $13.66 571-311-008 $13.66 571-311-009 $13.66 571-311-010 $13.66 571-311-011 $13.66 571-311-012 $13.66 571-311-013 $13.66 571-311-014 $13.66 571-311-015 $13.66 571-311-016 $13.66 571-311-017 $13.66 571-311-018 $13.66 571-311-019 $13.66 571-311-020 $13.66 571-311-021 $13.66 571-311-022 $13.66 571-311-023 $13.66 571-311-024 $13.66 571-311-025 $13.66 571-311-026 $13.66 571-311-027 $13.66 571-311-028 $13.66 571-311-029 $13.66 571-311-030 $13.66 571-311-031 $13.66 571-312-001 $13.66 571-312-003 $13.66 571-312-004 $13.66 571-312-005 $13.66 571-312-006 $13.66 571-312-007 $13.66 571-312-008 $13.66 571-312-009 $13.66 571-312-010 $13.66 571-312-012 $13.66 571-312-013 $13.66 571-320-001 $13.66 571-320-002 $13.66 571-320-003 $13.66 571-320-005 $13.66 571-320-006 $13.66 571-320-007 $13.66 571-320-008 $13.66 571-320-009 $13.66 571-320-010 $13.66 571-320-011 $13.66 571-320-012 $13.66 571-320-013 $13.66 571-320-014 $13.66 571-331-001 $13.66 571-331-002 $13.66 571-331-003 $13.66 571-332-001 $13.66 571-332-002 $13.66 571-332-003 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-332-004 $13.66 571-332-005 $13.66 571-332-006 $13.66 571-332-007 $13.66 571-332-008 $13.66 571-332-009 $13.66 571-332-010 $13.66 571-332-011 $13.66 571-332-013 $13.66 571-332-014 $13.66 571-332-015 $13.66 571-332-016 $13.66 571-332-017 $13.66 571-332-018 $13.66 571-332-019 $13.66 571-340-001 $13.66 571-340-002 $13.66 571-340-003 $13.66 571-340-004 $13.66 571-340-005 $13.66 571-340-006 $13.66 571-340-007 $13.66 571-340-008 $13.66 571-340-009 $13.66 571-340-010 $13.66 571-340-011 $13.66 571-340-012 $13.66 571-340-013 $13.66 571-340-014 $13.66 571-340-015 $13.66 571-340-016 $13.66 571-340-017 $13.66 571-340-018 $13.66 571-340-019 $13.66 571-340-020 $13.66 571-340-021 $13.66 571-340-022 $13.66 571-340-023 $13.66 571-340-024 $13.66 571-340-025 $13.66 571-340-026 $13.66 571-340-027 $13.66 571-340-028 $13.66 571-340-029 $13.66 571-340-030 $13.66 571-340-031 $13.66 571-340-032 $13.66 571-340-033 $13.66 571-340-034 $13.66 571-340-035 $13.66 571-340-036 $13.66 571-350-001 $13.66 571-350-002 $13.66 571-350-003 $13.66 571-350-004 $13.66 571-350-005 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 571-350-006 $13.66 571-350-007 $13.66 571-350-008 $13.66 571-350-009 $13.66 571-350-010 $13.66 571-350-011 $13.66 571-350-012 $13.66 571-350-013 $13.66 571-350-014 $13.66 571-350-015 $13.66 571-350-016 $13.66 571-350-017 $13.66 571-350-018 $13.66 571-350-019 $13.66 571-350-020 $13.66 571-350-021 $13.66 571-350-022 $13.66 571-350-023 $13.66 571-350-024 $13.66 571-350-025 $13.66 571-350-026 $13.66 571-350-027 $13.66 571-360-001 $13.66 571-360-003 $13.66 571-360-004 $13.66 571-360-005 $13.66 571-360-006 $13.66 571-360-007 $13.66 572-011-001 $13.66 572-011-002 $13.66 572-011-003 $13.66 572-011-004 $13.66 572-011-005 $13.66 572-011-006 $6.82 572-011-007 $13.66 572-011-008 $13.66 572-011-009 $13.66 572-012-001 $13.66 572-012-002 $13.66 572-012-003 $13.66 572-012-004 $13.66 572-012-005 $13.66 572-012-006 $13.66 572-012-007 $13.66 572-012-008 $13.66 572-012-009 $13.66 572-012-011 $13.66 572-012-012 $13.66 572-012-013 $13.66 572-012-014 $13.66 572-012-015 $13.66 572-012-016 $13.66 572-012-020 $13.66 572-012-021 $13.66 572-012-022 $13.66 572-012-023 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-012-024 $13.66 572-012-025 $6.82 572-012-026 $13.66 572-012-027 $13.66 572-012-028 $13.66 572-013-001 $13.66 572-013-002 $13.66 572-013-003 $13.66 572-013-004 $13.66 572-013-005 $13.66 572-013-006 $13.66 572-013-007 $13.66 572-013-008 $13.66 572-014-001 $13.66 572-014-002 $13.66 572-014-003 $13.66 572-014-004 $13.66 572-014-005 $13.66 572-014-007 $13.66 572-014-008 $13.66 572-014-009 $13.66 572-014-016 $13.66 572-021-001 $13.66 572-021-002 $13.66 572-021-003 $13.66 572-021-004 $13.66 572-021-005 $13.66 572-021-006 $13.66 572-021-007 $13.66 572-021-008 $13.66 572-021-009 $13.66 572-022-001 $13.66 572-022-002 $13.66 572-022-003 $13.66 572-022-004 $13.66 572-022-005 $13.66 572-022-006 $13.66 572-022-009 $13.66 572-022-010 $13.66 572-022-013 $13.66 572-022-014 $13.66 572-022-015 $13.66 572-022-016 $13.66 572-022-017 $13.66 572-023-001 $13.66 572-023-002 $13.66 572-023-003 $6.82 572-023-004 $13.66 572-023-005 $13.66 572-023-006 $13.66 572-023-007 $13.66 572-023-008 $13.66 572-024-001 $13.66 572-024-002 $13.66 572-024-003 $13.66 572-024-004 $13.66 26 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-024-005 $13.66 572-024-006 $13.66 572-024-007 $13.66 572-024-008 $13.66 572-024-009 $13.66 572-024-010 $13.66 572-025-001 $13.66 572-025-002 $13.66 572-025-003 $13.66 572-025-004 $13.66 572-025-005 $13.66 572-025-006 $13.66 572-025-007 $13.66 572-025-008 $13.66 572-025-009 $13.66 572-026-001 $13.66 572-026-002 $13.66 572-026-003 $13.66 572-026-004 $13.66 572-026-005 $13.66 572-026-006 $13.66 572-026-007 $13.66 572-026-008 $13.66 572-026-009 $13.66 572-026-010 $13.66 572-026-011 $13.66 572-026-012 $13.66 572-026-013 $13.66 572-026-014 $13.66 572-026-015 $13.66 572-026-016 $13.66 572-026-017 $13.66 572-026-018 $13.66 572-027-001 $13.66 572-027-002 $13.66 572-027-003 $13.66 572-027-004 $13.66 572-027-005 $13.66 572-027-006 $13.66 572-027-007 $13.66 572-027-008 $13.66 572-027-009 $13.66 572-027-010 $13.66 572-027-011 $13.66 572-027-012 $13.66 572-028-001 $13.66 572-028-002 $13.66 572-028-003 $13.66 572-028-004 $13.66 572-028-005 $13.66 572-028-006 $13.66 572-028-007 $13.66 572-028-008 $13.66 572-028-009 $13.66 572-028-010 $13.66 572-028-011 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-029-006 $6.82 572-029-007 $13.66 572-029-008 $13.66 572-029-009 $13.66 572-029-011 $13.66 572-029-012 $13.66 572-031-001 $13.66 572-031-002 $13.66 572-031-003 $13.66 572-031-007 $13.66 572-032-001 $13.66 572-032-002 $13.66 572-032-003 $13.66 572-032-004 $13.66 572-032-005 $13.66 572-032-006 $13.66 572-032-007 $13.66 572-032-008 $13.66 572-032-010 $13.66 572-032-012 $13.66 572-032-014 $13.66 572-032-016 $13.66 572-032-017 $13.66 572-032-018 $6.82 572-032-020 $13.66 572-032-023 $13.66 572-032-024 $13.66 572-032-025 $13.66 572-033-001 $6.82 572-033-005 $13.66 572-033-006 $13.66 572-033-007 $13.66 572-033-008 $13.66 572-033-009 $13.66 572-033-011 $13.66 572-034-004 $13.66 572-034-005 $13.66 572-034-006 $13.66 572-034-007 $13.66 572-034-010 $13.66 572-034-011 $13.66 572-034-012 $13.66 572-034-014 $13.66 572-034-015 $13.66 572-034-016 $13.66 572-034-017 $13.66 572-034-018 $6.82 572-040-017 $8.20 572-050-001 $13.66 572-050-002 $13.66 572-050-005 $13.66 572-050-009 $13.66 572-050-013 $13.66 572-050-016 $13.66 572-050-017 $13.66 572-050-020 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-050-021 $13.66 572-050-022 $13.66 572-050-023 $13.66 572-050-024 $13.66 572-050-025 $13.66 572-050-026 $13.66 572-060-008 $13.66 572-060-009 $13.66 572-060-010 $13.66 572-060-011 $13.66 572-060-012 $13.66 572-060-013 $13.66 572-060-016 $13.66 572-060-017 $13.66 572-060-018 $13.66 572-060-026 $13.66 572-060-027 $13.66 572-060-028 $13.66 572-060-029 $13.66 572-060-030 $13.66 572-060-031 $13.66 572-060-032 $13.66 572-070-001 $13.66 572-070-002 $13.66 572-070-003 $13.66 572-070-011 $13.66 572-070-013 $13.66 572-070-014 $13.66 572-070-015 $13.66 572-070-016 $13.66 572-070-019 $13.66 572-070-020 $13.66 572-080-005 $6.82 572-080-007 $13.66 572-080-008 $13.66 572-080-009 $13.66 572-080-016 $13.66 572-080-017 $6.82 572-080-018 $13.66 572-080-023 $13.66 572-080-024 $13.66 572-080-025 $13.66 572-080-026 $13.66 572-080-028 $13.66 572-080-029 $6.82 572-080-030 $13.66 572-080-031 $6.82 572-080-035 $13.66 572-080-036 $13.66 572-090-001 $13.66 572-090-002 $13.66 572-090-003 $13.66 572-090-004 $13.66 572-090-005 $13.66 572-090-006 $13.66 572-090-007 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-090-008 $13.66 572-090-009 $13.66 572-090-010 $13.66 572-090-011 $13.66 572-090-012 $13.66 572-090-013 $13.66 572-090-014 $13.66 572-090-015 $13.66 572-090-016 $13.66 572-090-017 $13.66 572-090-018 $13.66 572-090-019 $13.66 572-100-001 $13.66 572-100-002 $13.66 572-100-003 $13.66 572-100-004 $13.66 572-100-005 $13.66 572-100-006 $13.66 572-100-007 $13.66 572-100-008 $6.82 572-100-009 $13.66 572-100-010 $13.66 572-100-011 $13.66 572-100-012 $13.66 572-100-013 $13.66 572-100-014 $13.66 572-100-015 $13.66 572-100-016 $13.66 572-100-017 $13.66 572-100-018 $13.66 572-110-001 $13.66 572-110-002 $13.66 572-110-003 $13.66 572-110-004 $13.66 572-110-005 $13.66 572-110-006 $13.66 572-110-007 $13.66 572-110-008 $13.66 572-110-009 $13.66 572-110-010 $13.66 572-110-011 $13.66 572-110-012 $13.66 572-110-013 $13.66 572-110-014 $13.66 572-110-015 $13.66 572-110-016 $13.66 572-110-017 $13.66 572-110-018 $13.66 572-110-019 $13.66 572-110-020 $13.66 572-110-021 $13.66 572-110-022 $13.66 572-110-023 $13.66 572-110-024 $13.66 572-110-025 $13.66 572-110-029 $13.66 27 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-121-003 $13.66 572-121-004 $13.66 572-121-005 $13.66 572-121-006 $13.66 572-121-007 $13.66 572-121-008 $13.66 572-122-001 $13.66 572-122-002 $13.66 572-122-003 $13.66 572-122-004 $13.66 572-122-005 $13.66 572-122-006 $13.66 572-122-007 $13.66 572-122-008 $13.66 572-122-009 $13.66 572-122-010 $13.66 572-122-011 $13.66 572-123-001 $13.66 572-123-002 $13.66 572-123-003 $13.66 572-123-004 $13.66 572-124-001 $13.66 572-124-002 $13.66 572-124-003 $13.66 572-124-004 $13.66 572-124-005 $13.66 572-124-006 $13.66 572-124-007 $13.66 572-124-008 $13.66 572-124-009 $13.66 572-124-010 $13.66 572-124-011 $13.66 572-124-012 $13.66 572-124-013 $13.66 572-124-014 $13.66 572-124-015 $13.66 572-124-016 $13.66 572-124-017 $13.66 572-124-018 $13.66 572-130-001 $13.66 572-130-002 $13.66 572-130-003 $13.66 572-130-004 $13.66 572-130-005 $13.66 572-130-006 $13.66 572-130-007 $13.66 572-130-008 $13.66 572-130-009 $13.66 572-130-010 $13.66 572-130-011 $13.66 572-130-012 $13.66 572-130-013 $13.66 572-130-014 $13.66 572-130-015 $13.66 572-130-016 $13.66 572-130-017 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-130-018 $13.66 572-130-019 $13.66 572-130-020 $13.66 572-130-021 $13.66 572-130-022 $13.66 572-130-023 $13.66 572-130-024 $13.66 572-130-025 $13.66 572-130-026 $13.66 572-130-027 $13.66 572-130-028 $13.66 572-130-029 $13.66 572-130-030 $13.66 572-140-001 $13.66 572-140-002 $13.66 572-140-004 $13.66 572-140-005 $13.66 572-140-006 $13.66 572-140-007 $13.66 572-140-008 $13.66 572-140-009 $13.66 572-140-010 $13.66 572-140-011 $13.66 572-140-012 $13.66 572-140-013 $13.66 572-140-014 $13.66 572-140-015 $13.66 572-140-016 $13.66 572-140-017 $13.66 572-140-018 $13.66 572-140-019 $13.66 572-140-022 $13.66 572-140-025 $13.66 572-140-027 $13.66 572-140-028 $13.66 572-150-001 $13.66 572-150-002 $13.66 572-150-003 $13.66 572-150-004 $13.66 572-150-005 $13.66 572-150-006 $13.66 572-150-007 $13.66 572-150-008 $13.66 572-150-009 $13.66 572-150-010 $13.66 572-150-011 $13.66 572-150-012 $13.66 572-150-013 $13.66 572-150-015 $13.66 572-150-016 $13.66 572-150-017 $13.66 572-150-018 $13.66 572-150-019 $13.66 572-150-020 $13.66 572-150-021 $13.66 572-150-022 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-150-023 $13.66 572-150-024 $13.66 572-150-025 $13.66 572-150-026 $13.66 572-150-027 $13.66 572-150-028 $13.66 572-150-029 $13.66 572-150-030 $13.66 572-150-031 $13.66 572-160-001 $13.66 572-160-002 $13.66 572-160-003 $13.66 572-160-004 $13.66 572-160-005 $13.66 572-160-006 $13.66 572-160-010 $13.66 572-160-011 $13.66 572-160-012 $13.66 572-160-013 $13.66 572-160-014 $13.66 572-160-015 $13.66 572-160-016 $13.66 572-160-018 $13.66 572-160-023 $13.66 572-160-024 $13.66 572-160-025 $13.66 572-160-026 $13.66 572-160-027 $13.66 572-160-028 $13.66 572-160-029 $13.66 572-160-030 $13.66 572-160-032 $13.66 572-170-001 $13.66 572-170-002 $13.66 572-170-003 $13.66 572-170-004 $13.66 572-170-005 $13.66 572-170-006 $13.66 572-170-007 $13.66 572-170-008 $13.66 572-170-009 $13.66 572-170-011 $13.66 572-170-012 $13.66 572-170-013 $13.66 572-170-014 $13.66 572-170-015 $13.66 572-170-016 $13.66 572-170-017 $13.66 572-170-018 $13.66 572-170-019 $13.66 572-170-020 $13.66 572-170-021 $13.66 572-170-022 $13.66 572-170-023 $13.66 572-170-024 $13.66 572-170-025 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-170-026 $13.66 572-170-028 $13.66 572-170-029 $13.66 572-170-030 $13.66 572-170-031 $13.66 572-170-032 $13.66 572-170-033 $13.66 572-170-034 $13.66 572-170-035 $13.66 572-170-037 $13.66 572-170-038 $13.66 572-170-039 $13.66 572-170-040 $13.66 572-170-041 $13.66 572-170-042 $13.66 572-170-043 $13.66 572-170-044 $13.66 572-170-045 $13.66 572-181-002 $13.66 572-181-003 $13.66 572-181-004 $13.66 572-181-005 $13.66 572-181-006 $13.66 572-181-007 $13.66 572-181-008 $13.66 572-181-009 $13.66 572-181-010 $13.66 572-181-011 $13.66 572-181-013 $13.66 572-181-014 $13.66 572-181-015 $13.66 572-181-019 $13.66 572-181-020 $13.66 572-181-022 $13.66 572-181-023 $13.66 572-181-024 $13.66 572-181-025 $13.66 572-181-026 $13.66 572-181-027 $13.66 572-181-029 $13.66 572-181-030 $13.66 572-181-031 $13.66 572-181-032 $13.66 572-181-033 $13.66 572-181-034 $13.66 572-181-035 $13.66 572-181-036 $6.82 572-181-037 $13.66 572-181-038 $13.66 572-181-039 $13.66 572-181-040 $13.66 572-181-041 $13.66 572-182-001 $13.66 572-182-002 $13.66 572-182-003 $13.66 572-182-004 $13.66 28 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-182-007 $13.66 572-182-008 $13.66 572-182-009 $13.66 572-182-010 $13.66 572-182-013 $13.66 572-182-014 $13.66 572-182-015 $13.66 572-182-016 $13.66 572-182-017 $13.66 572-190-001 $13.66 572-190-002 $13.66 572-190-003 $13.66 572-190-004 $13.66 572-190-005 $13.66 572-190-006 $13.66 572-190-007 $13.66 572-190-008 $13.66 572-190-009 $13.66 572-190-010 $13.66 572-190-011 $13.66 572-190-012 $13.66 572-190-013 $13.66 572-201-002 $13.66 572-201-003 $13.66 572-201-004 $13.66 572-201-005 $13.66 572-201-006 $13.66 572-201-007 $13.66 572-201-008 $13.66 572-201-009 $13.66 572-201-010 $13.66 572-201-011 $13.66 572-201-012 $13.66 572-201-013 $13.66 572-201-014 $13.66 572-201-015 $13.66 572-201-016 $13.66 572-201-019 $13.66 572-201-020 $13.66 572-201-021 $6.82 572-202-004 $13.66 572-202-005 $13.66 572-202-006 $13.66 572-202-007 $13.66 572-202-008 $13.66 572-202-009 $13.66 572-202-010 $13.66 572-202-012 $13.66 572-202-013 $13.66 572-202-014 $13.66 572-202-015 $13.66 572-202-016 $13.66 572-202-020 $13.66 572-202-023 $13.66 572-202-024 $13.66 572-202-025 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-202-026 $13.66 572-202-027 $13.66 572-202-029 $13.66 572-202-032 $13.66 572-203-001 $13.66 572-203-002 $13.66 572-203-003 $13.66 572-203-004 $13.66 572-203-007 $13.66 572-203-008 $13.66 572-203-009 $13.66 572-203-010 $13.66 572-203-011 $13.66 572-203-012 $6.82 572-203-013 $13.66 572-203-014 $13.66 572-203-015 $13.66 572-203-016 $13.66 572-203-017 $13.66 572-203-018 $13.66 572-203-019 $13.66 572-203-020 $13.66 572-203-021 $13.66 572-203-022 $13.66 572-203-023 $13.66 572-203-024 $13.66 572-203-025 $13.66 572-203-028 $6.82 572-203-029 $13.66 572-204-001 $13.66 572-204-002 $13.66 572-204-003 $13.66 572-204-004 $13.66 572-204-005 $13.66 572-204-006 $13.66 572-204-007 $13.66 572-204-008 $13.66 572-204-009 $13.66 572-204-010 $13.66 572-204-011 $13.66 572-204-012 $13.66 572-204-013 $13.66 572-204-014 $13.66 572-204-015 $13.66 572-204-016 $13.66 572-204-017 $13.66 572-204-018 $13.66 572-204-019 $13.66 572-204-020 $13.66 572-210-002 $13.66 572-221-001 $13.66 572-221-003 $13.66 572-221-004 $13.66 572-221-005 $13.66 572-221-006 $13.66 572-221-007 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-221-008 $6.82 572-222-003 $13.66 572-222-004 $13.66 572-222-005 $13.66 572-222-006 $13.66 572-222-007 $13.66 572-222-008 $13.66 572-222-009 $13.66 572-222-010 $13.66 572-222-011 $13.66 572-222-012 $13.66 572-222-013 $13.66 572-222-014 $13.66 572-222-015 $13.66 572-222-016 $13.66 572-222-017 $13.66 572-222-018 $13.66 572-222-019 $13.66 572-222-020 $13.66 572-222-021 $13.66 572-222-022 $13.66 572-222-023 $40.98 572-222-025 $6.82 572-222-026 $13.66 572-231-001 $13.66 572-231-002 $13.66 572-231-003 $13.66 572-231-004 $13.66 572-231-005 $13.66 572-231-006 $13.66 572-231-007 $13.66 572-231-008 $13.66 572-231-009 $13.66 572-231-010 $6.82 572-231-011 $13.66 572-231-012 $13.66 572-231-013 $13.66 572-231-014 $13.66 572-231-015 $13.66 572-231-016 $13.66 572-231-017 $13.66 572-231-018 $13.66 572-231-019 $13.66 572-231-020 $13.66 572-231-021 $13.66 572-231-022 $13.66 572-231-023 $13.66 572-231-024 $13.66 572-231-025 $13.66 572-231-026 $13.66 572-231-027 $13.66 572-231-028 $13.66 572-231-029 $13.66 572-232-001 $13.66 572-232-002 $13.66 572-232-003 $13.66 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 572-232-004 $13.66 572-232-005 $13.66 572-232-006 $13.66 572-232-007 $13.66 572-232-008 $13.66 572-232-009 $13.66 572-232-010 $13.66 572-232-011 $13.66 572-232-012 $13.66 572-232-013 $13.66 572-232-014 $13.66 572-232-015 $13.66 572-232-016 $13.66 572-232-017 $13.66 572-232-018 $13.66 572-232-019 $13.66 572-232-020 $13.66 572-232-021 $13.66 572-232-022 $13.66 572-232-023 $13.66 572-232-024 $13.66 572-232-025 $13.66 572-232-026 $13.66 572-233-001 $13.66 572-233-002 $13.66 572-233-003 $13.66 572-233-004 $13.66 572-233-005 $13.66 572-233-006 $13.66 572-233-007 $13.66 572-233-008 $13.66 572-233-009 $13.66 572-233-010 $13.66 572-233-011 $13.66 572-233-012 $13.66 572-233-013 $13.66 572-233-014 $13.66 572-233-015 $13.66 572-233-016 $13.66 572-234-001 $13.66 572-234-002 $13.66 572-234-003 $13.66 572-234-004 $13.66 572-234-005 $13.66 572-234-006 $13.66 572-234-007 $13.66 573-091-002 $13.66 573-091-003 $13.66 573-091-004 $13.66 573-091-007 $13.66 573-091-008 $13.66 573-091-009 $13.66 573-092-001 $13.66 573-092-002 $13.66 573-092-003 $13.66 573-092-004 $13.66 29 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 21 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2846 LW LEVY CODE: Kensington Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 573-093-001 $13.66 573-093-002 $13.66 573-093-003 $13.66 573-093-004 $13.66 573-093-005 $13.66 573-093-006 $13.66 573-093-007 $13.66 573-093-008 $13.66 573-093-009 $13.66 573-093-011 $13.66 573-093-012 $13.66 573-093-013 $13.66 573-093-014 $13.66 573-093-015 $13.66 573-093-016 $13.66 573-093-017 $13.66 573-093-018 $6.82 2257Total Parcels: $30,660.74 Total Assessment: 30 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 22 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2857 LF LEVY CODE: Seabreeze - Bay Point Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-541-001 $290.00 098-541-002 $290.00 098-541-003 $290.00 098-541-004 $290.00 098-541-005 $290.00 098-541-006 $290.00 098-541-007 $290.00 098-541-008 $290.00 098-541-009 $290.00 098-541-010 $290.00 098-541-011 $290.00 098-541-012 $290.00 098-541-013 $290.00 098-541-014 $290.00 098-541-015 $290.00 098-541-016 $290.00 098-541-017 $290.00 098-541-018 $290.00 098-541-019 $290.00 098-541-020 $290.00 098-541-021 $290.00 098-541-022 $290.00 098-541-023 $290.00 098-541-024 $290.00 098-541-025 $290.00 098-541-026 $290.00 098-541-027 $290.00 098-541-028 $290.00 098-541-029 $290.00 098-541-030 $290.00 098-541-031 $290.00 098-541-032 $290.00 098-541-033 $290.00 098-541-034 $290.00 098-541-035 $290.00 098-541-036 $290.00 098-541-037 $290.00 098-541-038 $290.00 098-541-039 $290.00 098-542-001 $290.00 098-542-002 $290.00 098-542-003 $290.00 098-542-004 $290.00 098-542-005 $290.00 098-542-006 $290.00 098-542-007 $290.00 098-542-008 $290.00 098-542-009 $290.00 098-542-010 $290.00 098-542-011 $290.00 098-542-012 $290.00 098-542-013 $290.00 098-542-014 $290.00 098-542-015 $290.00 098-542-016 $290.00 098-542-017 $290.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-542-018 $290.00 098-542-019 $290.00 098-542-020 $290.00 098-542-021 $290.00 098-542-022 $290.00 098-542-023 $290.00 098-542-024 $290.00 098-542-025 $290.00 098-542-026 $290.00 098-542-029 $290.00 098-542-030 $290.00 098-542-031 $290.00 098-542-032 $290.00 098-542-033 $290.00 098-551-001 $290.00 098-551-002 $290.00 098-551-003 $290.00 098-551-004 $290.00 098-551-005 $290.00 098-551-006 $290.00 098-551-007 $290.00 098-551-008 $290.00 098-551-009 $290.00 098-551-010 $290.00 098-551-011 $290.00 098-551-012 $290.00 098-551-013 $290.00 098-551-014 $290.00 098-551-015 $290.00 098-551-016 $290.00 098-551-017 $290.00 098-552-001 $290.00 098-552-002 $290.00 098-552-003 $290.00 098-552-004 $290.00 098-552-005 $290.00 098-552-006 $290.00 098-552-007 $290.00 098-552-008 $290.00 098-552-009 $290.00 098-552-010 $290.00 098-552-011 $290.00 098-552-012 $290.00 098-552-013 $290.00 098-552-014 $290.00 098-552-015 $290.00 098-552-016 $290.00 098-552-017 $290.00 098-552-018 $290.00 098-552-019 $290.00 098-552-020 $290.00 098-552-021 $290.00 098-552-022 $290.00 098-552-023 $290.00 098-552-024 $290.00 098-552-025 $290.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 098-552-026 $290.00 098-552-027 $290.00 098-552-028 $290.00 098-552-029 $290.00 098-552-030 $290.00 098-552-031 $290.00 098-552-032 $290.00 098-552-033 $290.00 098-552-034 $290.00 098-552-035 $290.00 098-552-036 $290.00 098-552-037 $290.00 098-552-038 $290.00 098-552-039 $290.00 098-552-040 $290.00 098-552-041 $290.00 098-552-042 $290.00 098-552-043 $290.00 098-552-044 $290.00 098-552-045 $290.00 098-552-046 $290.00 098-552-047 $290.00 098-552-048 $290.00 098-552-049 $290.00 098-552-050 $290.00 098-580-001 $290.00 098-580-002 $290.00 098-580-003 $290.00 098-580-004 $290.00 098-580-005 $290.00 098-580-006 $290.00 098-580-007 $290.00 098-580-008 $290.00 098-580-009 $290.00 098-580-010 $290.00 098-580-011 $290.00 098-580-012 $290.00 098-580-013 $290.00 098-580-014 $290.00 098-580-015 $290.00 098-580-016 $290.00 098-580-017 $290.00 154Total Parcels: $44,660.00 Total Assessment: 31 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 27 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2855 LM LEVY CODE: Bettencourt Ranch - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 203-061-001 $105.68 203-061-002 $105.68 203-061-003 $105.68 203-061-004 $105.68 203-061-005 $105.68 203-061-006 $105.68 203-061-007 $105.68 203-061-008 $105.68 203-061-009 $105.68 203-061-010 $105.68 203-061-011 $105.68 203-061-012 $105.68 203-061-013 $105.68 203-061-014 $105.68 203-061-015 $105.68 203-061-016 $105.68 203-061-017 $105.68 203-061-018 $105.68 203-061-019 $105.68 203-061-020 $105.68 203-061-021 $105.68 203-061-022 $105.68 203-061-023 $105.68 203-061-024 $105.68 203-061-025 $105.68 203-061-026 $105.68 203-061-027 $105.68 203-061-028 $105.68 203-061-029 $105.68 203-061-030 $105.68 203-061-031 $105.68 203-061-032 $105.68 203-061-033 $105.68 203-061-034 $105.68 203-061-035 $105.68 203-061-036 $105.68 203-061-037 $105.68 203-061-038 $105.68 203-061-039 $105.68 203-061-040 $105.68 203-061-041 $105.68 203-061-042 $105.68 203-061-043 $105.68 203-061-044 $105.68 203-061-045 $105.68 203-061-046 $105.68 203-061-047 $105.68 203-061-048 $105.68 203-061-049 $105.68 203-061-050 $105.68 203-061-051 $105.68 203-061-052 $105.68 203-061-053 $105.68 203-061-054 $105.68 203-061-055 $105.68 203-061-056 $105.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 203-061-057 $105.68 203-061-058 $105.68 203-061-059 $105.68 203-061-060 $105.68 203-061-061 $105.68 203-061-062 $105.68 203-061-063 $105.68 203-061-064 $105.68 203-061-065 $105.68 203-061-070 $191.28 203-071-001 $105.68 203-071-002 $105.68 203-071-003 $105.68 203-071-004 $105.68 203-071-005 $105.68 203-071-006 $105.68 203-071-007 $105.68 203-071-008 $105.68 203-071-009 $105.68 203-071-010 $105.68 203-071-011 $105.68 203-071-012 $105.68 203-071-013 $105.68 203-071-014 $105.68 203-071-015 $105.68 203-071-016 $105.68 203-071-017 $105.68 203-071-018 $105.68 203-071-019 $105.68 203-071-020 $105.68 203-071-021 $105.68 203-071-022 $105.68 203-071-023 $105.68 203-071-024 $105.68 203-071-025 $105.68 203-071-026 $105.68 203-071-027 $105.68 203-071-028 $105.68 203-071-029 $105.68 203-071-030 $105.68 203-071-031 $105.68 203-071-032 $105.68 203-071-033 $105.68 203-071-034 $105.68 203-071-035 $105.68 203-071-036 $105.68 203-071-037 $105.68 203-071-038 $105.68 203-071-039 $105.68 203-071-040 $105.68 203-071-041 $105.68 203-071-042 $105.68 203-071-043 $105.68 203-071-044 $105.68 203-071-045 $105.68 203-071-046 $105.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 203-071-047 $105.68 203-071-048 $105.68 203-071-049 $105.68 203-071-050 $105.68 203-071-051 $105.68 203-071-052 $105.68 203-071-053 $105.68 203-071-054 $105.68 203-071-055 $105.68 203-071-056 $105.68 203-071-057 $105.68 203-071-058 $105.68 203-071-059 $105.68 203-071-060 $105.68 203-071-061 $105.68 203-071-062 $105.68 203-071-063 $105.68 203-071-064 $105.68 203-071-065 $105.68 203-071-066 $105.68 203-071-067 $105.68 203-071-068 $105.68 203-071-069 $105.68 203-071-070 $105.68 203-071-071 $105.68 203-071-072 $105.68 203-071-073 $105.68 203-071-074 $105.68 203-071-075 $105.68 203-071-076 $105.68 203-071-077 $105.68 203-071-078 $105.68 203-071-079 $105.68 203-071-080 $105.68 203-071-081 $105.68 203-071-082 $105.68 203-071-083 $105.68 203-071-084 $105.68 203-071-085 $105.68 220-440-010 $150.00 220-440-011 $150.00 220-440-012 $150.00 220-440-013 $150.00 220-440-014 $150.00 220-440-015 $150.00 220-440-016 $150.00 220-440-017 $150.00 220-440-018 $150.00 220-440-019 $150.00 220-440-020 $150.00 220-440-023 $150.00 220-440-024 $150.00 220-440-025 $150.00 220-440-026 $150.00 220-440-027 $150.00 220-440-030 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-440-031 $150.00 220-440-032 $150.00 220-440-033 $150.00 220-440-034 $150.00 220-440-035 $150.00 220-440-036 $150.00 220-440-038 $150.00 220-440-039 $150.00 220-440-040 $150.00 220-440-041 $150.00 220-450-010 $150.00 220-450-011 $150.00 220-450-012 $150.00 220-450-013 $150.00 220-450-014 $150.00 220-450-015 $150.00 220-450-016 $150.00 220-450-017 $150.00 220-450-018 $150.00 220-450-019 $150.00 220-450-020 $150.00 220-450-021 $150.00 220-450-022 $150.00 220-450-023 $150.00 220-450-024 $150.00 220-450-025 $150.00 220-450-026 $150.00 220-450-027 $150.00 220-450-028 $150.00 220-450-029 $150.00 220-450-030 $150.00 220-450-031 $150.00 220-450-032 $150.00 220-450-033 $150.00 220-450-034 $150.00 220-450-035 $150.00 220-450-036 $150.00 220-450-037 $150.00 220-450-038 $150.00 220-450-039 $150.00 220-450-040 $150.00 220-450-041 $150.00 220-450-042 $150.00 220-450-043 $150.00 220-450-044 $150.00 220-450-045 $150.00 220-450-046 $150.00 220-450-047 $150.00 220-450-048 $150.00 220-450-049 $150.00 220-450-050 $150.00 220-450-051 $150.00 220-460-028 $150.00 220-460-029 $150.00 220-460-030 $150.00 220-460-031 $150.00 32 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 27 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2855 LM LEVY CODE: Bettencourt Ranch - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-460-032 $150.00 220-460-033 $150.00 220-460-034 $150.00 220-460-035 $150.00 220-460-036 $150.00 220-460-037 $150.00 220-460-038 $150.00 220-460-039 $150.00 220-460-040 $150.00 220-460-041 $150.00 220-460-042 $150.00 220-460-043 $150.00 220-460-044 $150.00 220-460-045 $150.00 220-460-046 $150.00 220-460-047 $150.00 220-460-048 $150.00 220-460-049 $150.00 220-460-050 $150.00 220-460-051 $150.00 220-460-052 $150.00 220-460-053 $150.00 220-460-054 $150.00 220-460-055 $150.00 220-460-056 $150.00 220-460-057 $150.00 220-460-058 $150.00 220-460-059 $150.00 220-460-060 $150.00 220-460-061 $150.00 220-460-062 $150.00 220-460-063 $150.00 220-460-064 $150.00 220-460-065 $150.00 220-460-066 $150.00 220-750-001 $150.00 220-750-002 $150.00 220-750-003 $150.00 220-750-004 $150.00 220-750-005 $150.00 220-750-006 $150.00 220-750-007 $150.00 220-750-008 $150.00 220-750-009 $150.00 220-750-010 $150.00 220-750-011 $150.00 220-750-012 $150.00 220-750-013 $150.00 220-750-014 $150.00 220-750-015 $150.00 220-750-016 $150.00 220-750-017 $150.00 220-750-018 $150.00 220-750-019 $150.00 220-750-020 $150.00 220-750-021 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-750-022 $150.00 220-750-023 $150.00 220-750-024 $150.00 220-750-025 $150.00 220-750-026 $150.00 220-750-027 $150.00 220-750-028 $150.00 220-750-029 $150.00 220-750-030 $150.00 220-750-031 $150.00 220-750-032 $150.00 220-750-033 $150.00 220-750-034 $150.00 220-750-035 $150.00 220-750-036 $150.00 220-750-037 $150.00 220-750-038 $150.00 220-750-039 $150.00 220-750-040 $150.00 220-750-041 $150.00 220-750-042 $150.00 220-750-043 $150.00 220-750-044 $150.00 220-750-045 $150.00 220-750-046 $150.00 220-750-047 $150.00 220-750-048 $150.00 220-750-049 $150.00 220-750-050 $150.00 220-750-051 $150.00 220-750-052 $150.00 220-760-001 $150.00 220-760-002 $150.00 220-760-003 $150.00 220-760-004 $150.00 220-760-005 $150.00 220-760-006 $150.00 220-760-007 $150.00 220-760-008 $150.00 220-760-009 $150.00 220-760-010 $150.00 220-760-011 $150.00 220-760-012 $150.00 220-760-013 $150.00 220-760-014 $150.00 220-760-015 $150.00 220-760-016 $150.00 220-760-017 $150.00 220-760-018 $150.00 220-760-019 $150.00 220-760-020 $150.00 220-760-021 $150.00 220-760-022 $150.00 220-760-023 $150.00 220-760-024 $150.00 220-760-025 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-760-026 $150.00 220-760-027 $150.00 220-760-028 $150.00 220-760-029 $150.00 220-760-030 $150.00 220-760-031 $150.00 220-760-032 $150.00 220-770-001 $150.00 220-770-002 $150.00 220-770-003 $150.00 220-770-004 $150.00 220-770-005 $150.00 220-770-006 $150.00 220-770-007 $150.00 220-770-008 $150.00 220-770-009 $150.00 220-770-010 $150.00 220-770-011 $150.00 220-770-012 $150.00 220-770-013 $150.00 220-770-014 $150.00 220-770-015 $150.00 220-770-016 $150.00 220-770-017 $150.00 220-770-018 $150.00 220-770-019 $150.00 220-770-020 $150.00 220-770-021 $150.00 220-770-022 $150.00 220-770-023 $150.00 220-780-001 $150.00 220-780-002 $150.00 220-780-003 $150.00 220-780-004 $150.00 220-780-005 $150.00 220-780-006 $150.00 220-780-007 $150.00 220-780-008 $150.00 220-780-009 $150.00 220-780-010 $150.00 220-780-011 $150.00 220-780-012 $150.00 220-780-013 $150.00 220-780-014 $150.00 220-780-015 $150.00 220-780-016 $150.00 220-780-017 $150.00 220-780-018 $150.00 220-780-019 $150.00 220-780-020 $150.00 220-780-021 $150.00 220-790-001 $150.00 220-790-002 $150.00 220-790-003 $150.00 220-790-004 $150.00 220-790-005 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-790-006 $150.00 220-790-007 $150.00 220-790-008 $150.00 220-790-009 $150.00 220-790-010 $150.00 220-790-011 $150.00 220-790-012 $150.00 220-790-013 $150.00 220-790-014 $150.00 220-790-015 $150.00 220-790-016 $150.00 220-790-017 $150.00 220-790-018 $150.00 220-790-019 $150.00 220-790-020 $150.00 220-790-021 $150.00 220-790-022 $150.00 220-790-023 $150.00 220-790-024 $150.00 220-790-025 $150.00 220-790-026 $150.00 220-790-027 $150.00 220-790-028 $150.00 220-790-029 $150.00 220-790-030 $150.00 220-790-031 $150.00 220-790-032 $150.00 220-790-033 $150.00 220-790-034 $150.00 220-790-035 $150.00 220-790-036 $150.00 220-790-037 $150.00 220-790-038 $150.00 220-790-039 $150.00 220-790-040 $150.00 220-790-041 $150.00 220-790-042 $150.00 220-790-043 $150.00 220-790-044 $150.00 220-790-045 $150.00 220-790-046 $150.00 220-790-047 $150.00 220-790-048 $150.00 220-790-049 $150.00 220-790-050 $150.00 220-790-051 $150.00 220-790-052 $150.00 220-790-053 $150.00 220-790-054 $150.00 220-790-055 $150.00 220-790-056 $150.00 220-790-057 $150.00 220-790-058 $150.00 220-790-059 $150.00 220-790-060 $150.00 220-790-061 $150.00 33 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 27 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2855 LM LEVY CODE: Bettencourt Ranch - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-790-062 $150.00 220-800-001 $150.00 220-800-002 $150.00 220-800-003 $150.00 220-800-004 $150.00 220-800-005 $150.00 220-800-006 $150.00 220-800-007 $150.00 220-800-008 $150.00 220-800-009 $150.00 220-800-010 $150.00 220-800-011 $150.00 220-800-012 $150.00 220-800-013 $150.00 220-800-014 $150.00 220-800-015 $150.00 220-800-016 $150.00 220-800-017 $150.00 220-800-018 $150.00 220-800-019 $150.00 220-800-020 $150.00 220-800-021 $150.00 220-800-022 $150.00 220-800-023 $150.00 220-800-024 $150.00 220-800-025 $150.00 220-800-026 $150.00 220-800-027 $150.00 220-800-028 $150.00 220-800-029 $150.00 220-800-030 $150.00 220-800-031 $150.00 220-800-032 $150.00 220-800-033 $150.00 220-800-034 $150.00 220-800-035 $150.00 220-800-036 $150.00 220-800-037 $150.00 220-810-001 $150.00 220-810-002 $150.00 220-810-003 $150.00 220-810-004 $150.00 220-810-005 $150.00 220-810-006 $150.00 220-810-007 $150.00 220-810-008 $150.00 220-810-009 $150.00 220-810-010 $150.00 220-810-011 $150.00 220-810-012 $150.00 220-810-013 $150.00 220-810-014 $150.00 220-810-015 $150.00 220-810-016 $150.00 220-810-017 $150.00 220-810-018 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-810-019 $150.00 220-810-020 $150.00 220-810-021 $150.00 220-810-022 $150.00 220-810-023 $150.00 220-820-001 $150.00 220-820-002 $150.00 220-820-003 $150.00 220-820-004 $150.00 220-820-005 $150.00 220-820-006 $150.00 220-820-007 $150.00 220-820-008 $150.00 220-820-009 $150.00 220-820-010 $150.00 220-820-011 $150.00 220-820-012 $150.00 220-820-013 $150.00 220-820-014 $150.00 220-820-015 $150.00 220-820-016 $150.00 220-820-017 $150.00 220-820-018 $150.00 220-820-019 $150.00 220-820-020 $150.00 220-820-021 $150.00 220-820-022 $150.00 220-820-023 $150.00 220-820-024 $150.00 220-820-025 $150.00 220-820-026 $150.00 220-820-027 $150.00 220-820-028 $150.00 220-820-029 $150.00 220-820-030 $150.00 220-820-031 $150.00 220-820-032 $150.00 220-820-033 $150.00 220-820-034 $150.00 220-820-035 $150.00 220-820-036 $150.00 220-820-037 $150.00 220-820-038 $150.00 220-820-039 $150.00 220-820-042 $150.00 220-820-043 $150.00 220-820-044 $150.00 220-820-045 $150.00 220-820-046 $150.00 220-820-047 $150.00 220-820-048 $150.00 220-820-049 $150.00 220-820-050 $150.00 220-820-051 $150.00 220-820-052 $150.00 220-820-053 $150.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-820-054 $150.00 220-820-055 $150.00 220-820-056 $150.00 220-820-057 $150.00 220-820-058 $150.00 220-820-059 $150.00 220-820-060 $150.00 220-820-061 $150.00 220-820-062 $150.00 220-820-063 $150.00 220-820-069 $150.00 220-820-070 $150.00 572Total Parcels: $79,193.28 Total Assessment: 34 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 35 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2881 ND LEVY CODE: Sandy Cove- Discovery Bay Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-220-039 $13,992.82 011-470-002 $3,889.24 011-470-003 $1,014.58 011-470-004 $1,690.98 011-470-005 $549.56 011-470-006 $1,690.98 011-470-007 $1,225.96 011-470-009 $11,519.76 011-470-010 $1,183.68 9Total Parcels: $36,757.56 Total Assessment: 35 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-070-005 $9.36 187-070-006 $9.36 187-070-007 $9.36 187-070-009 $9.36 187-070-015 $9.36 187-080-001 $9.36 187-080-002 $9.36 187-080-003 $9.36 187-080-005 $9.36 187-080-006 $9.36 187-080-007 $9.36 187-080-012 $9.36 187-080-013 $9.36 187-090-015 $9.36 187-090-016 $9.36 187-090-017 $9.36 187-090-018 $9.36 187-090-019 $9.36 187-090-020 $9.36 187-090-021 $9.36 187-090-022 $9.36 187-090-023 $9.36 187-090-024 $9.36 187-090-025 $9.36 187-090-026 $9.36 187-090-028 $9.36 187-100-003 $9.36 187-100-013 $9.36 187-100-014 $9.36 187-100-015 $9.36 187-100-016 $9.36 187-100-018 $9.36 187-100-019 $9.36 187-100-020 $9.36 187-100-021 $9.36 187-100-022 $9.36 187-100-023 $9.36 187-100-024 $9.36 187-100-025 $9.36 187-100-026 $9.36 187-100-027 $9.36 187-100-028 $9.36 187-100-029 $9.36 187-100-030 $9.36 187-110-003 $9.36 187-110-004 $9.36 187-110-005 $9.36 187-110-007 $9.36 187-110-008 $9.36 187-110-009 $9.36 187-110-010 $9.36 187-110-011 $9.36 187-110-012 $9.36 187-110-013 $9.36 187-110-014 $9.36 187-110-015 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-110-016 $9.36 187-110-021 $9.36 187-110-022 $9.36 187-110-023 $9.36 187-110-024 $9.36 187-110-025 $9.36 187-110-026 $9.36 187-110-027 $9.36 187-110-031 $9.36 187-110-032 $9.36 187-110-034 $9.36 187-110-037 $9.36 187-110-038 $9.36 187-110-039 $9.36 187-110-040 $9.36 187-110-041 $9.36 187-110-042 $9.36 187-110-043 $9.36 187-110-044 $9.36 187-110-045 $9.36 187-110-050 $9.36 187-120-001 $9.36 187-120-002 $9.36 187-120-003 $9.36 187-120-004 $9.36 187-120-009 $9.36 187-120-010 $9.36 187-120-011 $9.36 187-120-014 $9.36 187-120-015 $9.36 187-120-016 $9.36 187-120-018 $9.36 187-120-019 $9.36 187-120-020 $9.36 187-120-021 $9.36 187-120-022 $9.36 187-120-025 $9.36 187-120-031 $9.36 187-120-034 $9.36 187-120-035 $9.36 187-120-036 $9.36 187-120-041 $9.36 187-120-042 $9.36 187-120-043 $9.36 187-120-044 $9.36 187-120-045 $9.36 187-130-002 $9.36 187-130-003 $9.36 187-130-004 $9.36 187-130-006 $9.36 187-130-007 $9.36 187-130-009 $9.36 187-130-013 $9.36 187-130-014 $9.36 187-130-016 $9.36 187-130-018 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-130-019 $9.36 187-130-020 $9.36 187-130-021 $9.36 187-130-023 $9.36 187-171-027 $9.36 187-171-028 $9.36 187-171-029 $9.36 187-171-030 $9.36 187-171-031 $9.36 187-171-032 $9.36 187-171-033 $9.36 187-171-035 $9.36 187-171-036 $9.36 187-171-037 $9.36 187-171-038 $9.36 187-171-039 $9.36 187-171-042 $9.36 187-171-043 $9.36 187-171-044 $9.36 187-171-045 $9.36 187-171-046 $9.36 187-171-047 $9.36 187-171-051 $9.36 187-171-052 $9.36 187-171-053 $9.36 187-171-054 $9.36 187-171-055 $9.36 187-171-056 $9.36 187-171-058 $4.68 187-171-059 $4.68 187-171-060 $4.68 187-171-061 $4.68 187-171-062 $4.68 187-171-063 $4.68 187-171-064 $4.68 187-171-065 $4.68 187-171-066 $9.36 187-180-003 $9.36 187-180-004 $9.36 187-180-006 $9.36 187-180-008 $9.36 187-180-016 $9.36 187-180-019 $9.36 187-180-022 $9.36 187-180-023 $9.36 187-180-024 $9.36 187-180-025 $9.36 187-180-026 $9.36 187-180-027 $9.36 187-180-028 $9.36 187-180-029 $9.36 187-180-030 $9.36 187-180-031 $9.36 187-180-032 $9.36 187-231-010 $9.36 187-231-012 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-231-014 $9.36 187-231-016 $9.36 187-231-021 $9.36 187-231-023 $9.36 187-231-027 $9.36 187-231-028 $9.36 187-231-029 $9.36 187-231-030 $9.36 187-231-032 $9.36 187-231-033 $9.36 187-231-034 $9.36 187-231-035 $9.36 187-232-006 $9.36 187-232-010 $9.36 187-232-011 $9.36 187-232-012 $9.36 187-232-013 $9.36 187-232-014 $9.36 187-232-015 $9.36 187-232-018 $9.36 187-232-020 $9.36 187-232-021 $9.36 187-232-022 $9.36 187-232-023 $9.36 187-232-026 $9.36 187-232-027 $9.36 187-232-028 $9.36 187-232-030 $9.36 187-232-031 $9.36 187-232-032 $9.36 187-232-033 $9.36 187-232-034 $9.36 187-232-035 $9.36 187-232-036 $4.68 187-240-010 $9.36 187-240-014 $9.36 187-240-015 $9.36 187-240-020 $9.36 187-240-026 $9.36 187-240-027 $9.36 187-240-028 $9.36 187-240-029 $9.36 187-240-033 $9.36 187-240-058 $9.36 187-240-059 $9.36 187-240-061 $9.36 187-240-063 $9.36 187-240-064 $9.36 187-240-065 $9.36 187-240-066 $9.36 187-240-067 $9.36 187-240-068 $9.36 187-240-069 $9.36 187-240-070 $9.36 187-330-006 $9.36 187-330-009 $9.36 36 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-330-010 $9.36 187-330-011 $9.36 187-330-013 $4.68 187-330-015 $9.36 187-330-016 $9.36 187-330-017 $4.68 187-330-018 $9.36 187-330-019 $9.36 187-330-022 $9.36 187-330-023 $9.36 187-330-024 $9.36 187-330-025 $9.36 187-330-026 $9.36 187-330-027 $9.36 187-330-028 $9.36 187-330-030 $9.36 187-330-031 $9.36 187-330-032 $9.36 187-330-033 $9.36 187-430-001 $9.36 187-430-002 $9.36 187-430-003 $9.36 187-430-004 $9.36 187-430-005 $9.36 187-430-006 $9.36 187-430-007 $9.36 187-430-008 $9.36 187-430-009 $9.36 187-430-010 $9.36 187-430-011 $9.36 187-430-012 $9.36 187-430-013 $9.36 187-430-014 $9.36 187-430-015 $9.36 187-430-016 $9.36 187-430-017 $9.36 187-430-018 $9.36 187-430-019 $9.36 187-430-020 $9.36 187-430-021 $9.36 187-441-001 $9.36 187-441-002 $9.36 187-442-001 $9.36 187-442-002 $9.36 187-442-005 $9.36 187-442-006 $9.36 187-442-007 $9.36 187-443-001 $9.36 187-443-002 $9.36 187-443-003 $9.36 187-443-004 $9.36 187-450-001 $9.36 187-450-002 $9.36 187-450-003 $9.36 187-450-004 $9.36 187-450-005 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-450-006 $9.36 187-450-007 $9.36 187-470-001 $9.36 187-470-002 $9.36 187-470-003 $9.36 187-470-004 $9.36 187-470-005 $9.36 187-470-006 $9.36 187-470-007 $9.36 187-470-008 $9.36 187-470-009 $9.36 187-470-010 $9.36 187-470-011 $9.36 187-470-012 $9.36 187-470-013 $9.36 187-470-014 $9.36 187-490-001 $9.36 187-490-002 $9.36 187-490-003 $9.36 187-490-004 $9.36 187-490-005 $9.36 187-490-006 $9.36 187-490-007 $9.36 187-490-008 $9.36 187-490-009 $9.36 187-490-010 $9.36 187-490-011 $9.36 187-490-012 $9.36 187-490-013 $9.36 187-490-014 $9.36 187-490-015 $9.36 187-490-016 $9.36 187-490-017 $9.36 187-490-018 $9.36 187-490-019 $9.36 187-490-020 $9.36 187-490-021 $9.36 187-490-022 $9.36 187-490-023 $9.36 187-490-024 $9.36 187-490-025 $9.36 187-490-026 $9.36 187-490-027 $9.36 187-490-028 $9.36 187-490-029 $9.36 187-490-030 $9.36 187-490-035 $9.36 187-490-036 $9.36 187-490-037 $9.36 187-490-038 $9.36 187-490-039 $9.36 187-490-040 $9.36 187-490-041 $9.36 187-490-042 $9.36 187-490-043 $9.36 187-490-044 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-490-045 $9.36 187-490-046 $9.36 187-490-047 $9.36 187-490-048 $9.36 187-490-049 $9.36 187-490-050 $9.36 187-490-051 $9.36 187-490-052 $9.36 187-490-053 $9.36 187-490-054 $9.36 187-490-055 $9.36 187-490-056 $9.36 187-490-057 $9.36 187-490-058 $9.36 187-490-059 $9.36 187-490-060 $9.36 187-490-061 $9.36 187-490-062 $9.36 187-490-063 $9.36 187-500-001 $9.36 187-500-002 $9.36 187-500-003 $9.36 187-500-004 $9.36 187-500-005 $9.36 187-500-006 $9.36 187-500-007 $9.36 187-500-008 $9.36 187-500-009 $9.36 187-500-010 $9.36 187-500-011 $9.36 187-500-012 $9.36 187-500-013 $9.36 187-500-014 $9.36 187-500-015 $9.36 187-500-016 $9.36 187-500-017 $9.36 187-500-018 $9.36 187-500-019 $9.36 187-500-020 $9.36 187-500-021 $9.36 187-500-022 $9.36 187-500-023 $9.36 187-500-024 $9.36 187-500-025 $9.36 187-500-026 $9.36 187-500-027 $9.36 187-500-028 $9.36 187-510-001 $9.36 187-510-002 $9.36 187-510-003 $9.36 187-510-004 $9.36 187-510-005 $9.36 187-510-006 $9.36 187-510-007 $9.36 187-510-008 $9.36 187-510-009 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-510-010 $9.36 187-510-012 $9.36 187-510-013 $9.36 187-510-014 $9.36 187-510-015 $9.36 187-510-017 $9.36 187-510-018 $9.36 187-520-001 $9.36 187-520-002 $9.36 187-520-003 $9.36 187-520-004 $9.36 187-520-005 $9.36 187-520-006 $9.36 187-520-007 $9.36 187-520-008 $9.36 187-520-009 $9.36 187-520-010 $9.36 187-520-011 $9.36 187-520-012 $9.36 187-520-013 $9.36 187-520-014 $9.36 187-520-015 $9.36 187-520-016 $9.36 187-520-017 $9.36 187-520-018 $9.36 187-520-019 $9.36 187-520-020 $9.36 187-520-021 $9.36 187-520-022 $9.36 187-520-024 $9.36 187-520-025 $9.36 187-520-026 $9.36 187-520-027 $9.36 187-520-028 $9.36 187-520-029 $9.36 187-520-030 $9.36 187-520-031 $9.36 187-520-032 $9.36 187-520-033 $9.36 187-520-034 $9.36 187-520-035 $9.36 187-520-036 $9.36 187-520-037 $9.36 187-520-038 $9.36 187-531-001 $9.36 187-531-002 $9.36 187-531-003 $9.36 187-531-004 $9.36 187-531-005 $9.36 187-531-006 $9.36 187-531-007 $9.36 187-532-001 $9.36 187-532-002 $9.36 187-532-003 $9.36 187-532-004 $9.36 187-532-005 $9.36 37 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-532-006 $9.36 187-532-007 $9.36 187-532-008 $9.36 187-532-009 $9.36 187-532-010 $9.36 187-532-011 $9.36 187-533-001 $9.36 187-533-002 $9.36 187-533-003 $9.36 187-533-004 $9.36 187-534-001 $9.36 187-534-002 $9.36 187-535-001 $9.36 187-536-001 $9.36 187-537-001 $9.36 187-537-002 $9.36 187-537-003 $9.36 187-537-008 $9.36 187-537-010 $9.36 187-537-011 $9.36 187-537-012 $9.36 187-541-001 $9.36 187-541-002 $9.36 187-541-003 $9.36 187-541-004 $9.36 187-542-001 $9.36 187-542-002 $9.36 187-542-003 $9.36 187-542-004 $9.36 187-542-005 $9.36 187-542-006 $9.36 187-542-007 $9.36 187-542-008 $9.36 187-542-009 $9.36 187-542-010 $9.36 187-542-011 $9.36 187-543-001 $9.36 187-543-002 $9.36 187-543-003 $9.36 187-543-004 $9.36 187-544-003 $9.36 187-544-004 $9.36 187-551-001 $9.36 187-551-002 $9.36 187-551-003 $9.36 187-551-006 $9.36 187-551-007 $9.36 187-551-008 $9.36 187-552-001 $9.36 187-552-002 $9.36 188-190-006 $9.36 188-190-009 $9.36 188-190-010 $9.36 188-190-024 $9.36 188-190-030 $9.36 188-190-031 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-190-034 $9.36 188-200-001 $9.36 188-200-002 $9.36 188-200-004 $9.36 188-200-005 $9.36 188-200-006 $9.36 188-200-007 $9.36 188-200-008 $9.36 188-200-009 $9.36 188-200-010 $9.36 188-200-011 $9.36 188-200-012 $9.36 188-200-015 $9.36 188-200-017 $9.36 188-200-020 $9.36 188-200-022 $4.68 188-200-029 $9.36 188-200-030 $9.36 188-200-031 $9.36 188-200-032 $9.36 188-200-033 $9.36 188-200-036 $9.36 188-200-037 $9.36 188-200-038 $9.36 188-210-001 $9.36 188-210-003 $9.36 188-210-004 $9.36 188-210-006 $9.36 188-210-008 $9.36 188-210-009 $9.36 188-210-010 $9.36 188-210-019 $9.36 188-210-020 $9.36 188-210-021 $9.36 188-210-022 $9.36 188-210-023 $9.36 188-210-024 $9.36 188-210-025 $9.36 188-210-026 $9.36 188-210-027 $9.36 188-210-029 $9.36 188-210-030 $9.36 188-210-031 $4.68 188-210-032 $9.36 188-210-033 $9.36 188-210-035 $9.36 188-210-036 $9.36 188-210-037 $9.36 188-210-040 $9.36 188-210-045 $9.36 188-210-046 $9.36 188-210-047 $9.36 188-210-048 $4.68 188-232-002 $9.36 188-232-003 $9.36 188-232-004 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-232-005 $9.36 188-232-006 $9.36 188-232-011 $9.36 188-232-012 $9.36 188-232-013 $9.36 188-232-018 $9.36 188-232-019 $9.36 188-232-020 $9.36 188-232-022 $9.36 188-232-023 $9.36 188-232-027 $9.36 188-232-028 $9.36 188-232-029 $9.36 188-232-030 $9.36 188-232-035 $9.36 188-232-036 $9.36 188-232-037 $9.36 188-232-038 $9.36 188-232-042 $9.36 188-232-043 $9.36 188-232-044 $9.36 188-241-001 $9.36 188-241-007 $9.36 188-241-008 $9.36 188-241-009 $9.36 188-241-010 $9.36 188-241-011 $9.36 188-241-013 $9.36 188-241-014 $9.36 188-241-015 $9.36 188-241-017 $9.36 188-241-018 $9.36 188-241-019 $9.36 188-241-021 $9.36 188-241-022 $9.36 188-241-023 $9.36 188-241-025 $4.68 188-241-026 $9.36 188-241-027 $9.36 188-241-030 $9.36 188-241-031 $9.36 188-241-032 $9.36 188-241-033 $9.36 188-241-034 $9.36 188-251-001 $9.36 188-251-002 $9.36 188-251-003 $9.36 188-251-005 $9.36 188-251-006 $4.68 188-251-007 $9.36 188-251-008 $9.36 188-251-009 $9.36 188-251-010 $9.36 188-251-011 $9.36 188-251-012 $9.36 188-252-001 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-252-009 $9.36 188-252-010 $9.36 188-252-012 $9.36 188-252-013 $9.36 188-252-017 $9.36 188-252-020 $9.36 188-252-021 $9.36 188-252-023 $9.36 188-252-024 $9.36 188-252-025 $9.36 188-252-026 $9.36 188-252-027 $9.36 188-252-028 $9.36 188-261-001 $9.36 188-261-002 $9.36 188-261-003 $9.36 188-261-004 $9.36 188-261-005 $9.36 188-261-006 $9.36 188-261-007 $9.36 188-261-008 $9.36 188-261-009 $9.36 188-261-010 $9.36 188-261-011 $9.36 188-261-012 $9.36 188-262-001 $9.36 188-262-005 $9.36 188-262-006 $9.36 188-262-007 $9.36 188-262-010 $9.36 188-262-011 $9.36 188-262-017 $9.36 188-262-018 $9.36 188-262-019 $9.36 188-262-020 $9.36 188-262-021 $9.36 188-262-022 $9.36 188-270-003 $9.36 188-270-004 $9.36 188-270-005 $9.36 188-270-006 $9.36 188-270-007 $9.36 188-270-009 $9.36 188-270-010 $9.36 188-270-011 $9.36 188-270-012 $9.36 188-270-013 $9.36 188-270-014 $9.36 188-270-019 $9.36 188-270-020 $9.36 188-270-021 $9.36 188-270-022 $9.36 188-270-023 $9.36 188-270-024 $9.36 188-270-025 $9.36 188-270-026 $9.36 38 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-270-027 $9.36 188-270-028 $9.36 188-270-029 $9.36 188-270-030 $9.36 188-270-031 $9.36 188-270-032 $9.36 188-270-033 $9.36 188-270-035 $9.36 188-270-036 $9.36 188-270-037 $9.36 188-270-038 $9.36 188-270-039 $9.36 188-281-004 $9.36 188-281-006 $9.36 188-281-009 $9.36 188-281-011 $9.36 188-281-017 $9.36 188-281-020 $9.36 188-281-022 $9.36 188-281-023 $9.36 188-281-024 $9.36 188-281-025 $9.36 188-282-003 $9.36 188-282-007 $9.36 188-282-008 $9.36 188-282-011 $9.36 188-282-012 $9.36 188-282-013 $9.36 188-282-014 $9.36 188-282-015 $9.36 188-282-016 $9.36 188-283-001 $9.36 188-283-002 $9.36 188-283-003 $9.36 188-283-004 $9.36 188-283-005 $9.36 188-283-006 $9.36 188-283-007 $9.36 188-283-008 $9.36 188-283-009 $9.36 188-283-011 $9.36 188-283-012 $9.36 188-283-014 $9.36 188-291-007 $9.36 188-291-009 $9.36 188-291-017 $9.36 188-291-019 $9.36 188-291-020 $9.36 188-291-024 $4.68 188-291-025 $9.36 188-291-028 $9.36 188-291-035 $4.68 188-291-036 $9.36 188-292-003 $9.36 188-292-004 $9.36 188-292-008 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-292-010 $9.36 188-292-011 $9.36 188-292-013 $9.36 188-292-014 $9.36 188-292-015 $9.36 188-292-016 $9.36 188-292-020 $9.36 188-292-022 $9.36 188-292-023 $9.36 188-292-026 $9.36 188-292-027 $9.36 188-301-001 $9.36 188-301-002 $9.36 188-301-005 $9.36 188-301-006 $9.36 188-301-007 $9.36 188-301-008 $9.36 188-301-009 $9.36 188-302-001 $9.36 188-302-002 $9.36 188-302-003 $9.36 188-302-004 $9.36 188-302-005 $9.36 188-302-006 $9.36 188-302-007 $9.36 188-302-008 $9.36 188-302-009 $9.36 188-302-010 $9.36 188-302-011 $9.36 188-302-012 $9.36 188-302-018 $9.36 188-302-023 $9.36 188-302-024 $9.36 188-303-001 $9.36 188-303-005 $9.36 188-303-006 $9.36 188-303-008 $9.36 188-303-010 $9.36 188-303-011 $9.36 188-303-012 $9.36 188-303-013 $9.36 188-303-014 $9.36 188-303-015 $9.36 188-303-016 $9.36 188-303-017 $9.36 188-303-018 $9.36 188-311-002 $9.36 188-311-004 $9.36 188-311-006 $9.36 188-311-007 $9.36 188-311-008 $9.36 188-311-009 $9.36 188-311-010 $9.36 188-311-011 $9.36 188-312-003 $9.36 188-312-004 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-312-007 $9.36 188-312-009 $9.36 188-312-010 $9.36 188-320-007 $9.36 188-320-008 $9.36 188-320-010 $9.36 188-320-011 $9.36 188-320-012 $9.36 188-320-013 $9.36 188-320-014 $9.36 188-320-015 $9.36 188-320-016 $9.36 188-321-001 $9.36 188-321-002 $9.36 188-321-003 $9.36 188-321-004 $9.36 188-321-007 $9.36 188-321-008 $9.36 188-321-010 $9.36 188-321-011 $9.36 188-330-001 $9.36 188-330-005 $9.36 188-330-011 $9.36 188-330-013 $9.36 188-330-021 $9.36 188-330-022 $9.36 188-330-025 $9.36 188-330-026 $9.36 188-330-027 $9.36 188-330-034 $9.36 188-330-035 $9.36 188-330-036 $9.36 188-330-037 $4.68 188-340-011 $9.36 188-340-012 $9.36 188-340-014 $9.36 188-340-016 $9.36 188-340-019 $9.36 188-340-021 $4.68 188-340-022 $9.36 188-340-023 $9.36 188-340-024 $9.36 188-351-001 $9.36 188-351-002 $9.36 188-351-003 $9.36 188-351-004 $9.36 188-351-005 $9.36 188-351-006 $9.36 188-351-010 $9.36 188-351-011 $9.36 188-351-012 $9.36 188-351-013 $9.36 188-351-014 $9.36 188-351-015 $9.36 188-351-016 $9.36 188-351-019 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-351-020 $9.36 188-352-001 $9.36 188-352-002 $9.36 188-353-001 $9.36 188-353-002 $9.36 188-353-003 $9.36 188-354-001 $9.36 188-354-002 $9.36 188-354-005 $9.36 188-354-006 $9.36 188-354-007 $9.36 188-354-008 $9.36 188-354-009 $9.36 188-354-010 $9.36 188-354-011 $9.36 188-354-012 $9.36 188-360-002 $9.36 188-360-010 $9.36 188-360-013 $9.36 188-360-015 $9.36 188-360-016 $9.36 188-360-019 $9.36 188-360-020 $9.36 188-360-021 $9.36 188-360-022 $9.36 188-360-023 $9.36 188-360-026 $9.36 188-360-027 $9.36 188-360-028 $9.36 188-360-029 $9.36 188-370-006 $9.36 188-370-007 $9.36 188-370-008 $9.36 188-370-009 $9.36 188-370-010 $9.36 188-370-013 $9.36 188-370-014 $9.36 188-370-015 $9.36 188-370-016 $9.36 188-370-017 $9.36 188-370-018 $9.36 188-370-025 $9.36 188-370-026 $9.36 188-370-027 $9.36 188-370-032 $9.36 188-370-033 $9.36 188-370-035 $9.36 188-370-036 $9.36 188-370-037 $9.36 188-370-038 $9.36 188-381-009 $9.36 188-381-010 $9.36 188-381-011 $9.36 188-381-012 $9.36 188-381-015 $9.36 188-381-019 $9.36 39 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-381-020 $9.36 188-382-009 $9.36 188-382-010 $9.36 188-382-011 $9.36 188-382-012 $9.36 188-382-013 $9.36 188-382-014 $9.36 188-382-015 $9.36 188-382-017 $9.36 188-391-008 $9.36 188-391-009 $9.36 188-391-010 $9.36 188-391-013 $9.36 188-391-014 $9.36 188-391-015 $9.36 188-391-016 $9.36 188-392-009 $9.36 188-392-010 $4.68 188-392-011 $4.68 188-392-014 $9.36 188-392-015 $9.36 188-392-016 $9.36 188-392-018 $9.36 188-392-019 $9.36 188-401-003 $9.36 188-401-004 $9.36 188-401-005 $9.36 188-402-005 $9.36 188-402-006 $9.36 188-402-007 $9.36 188-402-008 $9.36 188-403-008 $9.36 188-403-009 $9.36 188-403-010 $9.36 188-403-011 $9.36 188-403-012 $9.36 188-403-013 $9.36 188-411-005 $9.36 188-411-012 $4.68 188-411-013 $9.36 188-411-014 $9.36 188-412-001 $9.36 188-412-002 $9.36 188-412-003 $9.36 188-412-004 $4.68 188-412-007 $9.36 188-412-008 $9.36 188-412-009 $9.36 188-412-010 $9.36 188-412-014 $9.36 188-412-015 $9.36 188-420-008 $9.36 188-420-012 $9.36 188-420-013 $9.36 188-420-014 $9.36 188-450-001 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 188-450-002 $9.36 188-450-003 $9.36 188-450-004 $9.36 188-450-005 $9.36 188-450-006 $9.36 188-450-007 $9.36 188-450-008 $9.36 188-450-009 $9.36 188-450-010 $9.36 188-450-011 $9.36 188-450-012 $9.36 188-450-013 $9.36 188-450-014 $9.36 188-450-015 $9.36 188-450-016 $9.36 188-450-017 $9.36 188-450-018 $9.36 188-450-019 $9.36 191-010-007 $9.36 191-010-008 $9.36 191-010-009 $9.36 191-010-010 $9.36 191-010-012 $9.36 191-010-013 $9.36 191-010-016 $9.36 191-010-017 $9.36 191-010-018 $9.36 191-010-019 $9.36 191-010-020 $9.36 191-010-021 $9.36 191-010-022 $9.36 191-010-023 $9.36 191-010-025 $9.36 191-010-026 $9.36 191-010-027 $4.68 191-020-001 $9.36 191-020-002 $9.36 191-020-004 $9.36 191-020-005 $9.36 191-020-006 $9.36 191-020-010 $9.36 191-020-015 $9.36 191-020-016 $9.36 191-020-017 $9.36 191-020-018 $9.36 191-020-019 $9.36 191-020-021 $9.36 191-020-022 $9.36 191-020-023 $9.36 191-020-025 $9.36 191-020-026 $9.36 191-020-027 $9.36 191-020-030 $9.36 191-020-036 $9.36 191-020-037 $9.36 191-020-038 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-020-039 $9.36 191-020-040 $9.36 191-020-041 $9.36 191-020-044 $9.36 191-020-045 $9.36 191-020-051 $9.36 191-020-053 $9.36 191-020-054 $9.36 191-020-055 $9.36 191-020-056 $9.36 191-020-057 $9.36 191-020-059 $9.36 191-020-060 $9.36 191-020-063 $9.36 191-030-002 $9.36 191-030-004 $9.36 191-030-008 $9.36 191-030-011 $9.36 191-030-012 $9.36 191-030-013 $9.36 191-030-014 $9.36 191-030-015 $9.36 191-030-017 $9.36 191-030-018 $9.36 191-030-019 $9.36 191-030-020 $9.36 191-030-022 $9.36 191-030-023 $9.36 191-030-024 $9.36 191-030-025 $9.36 191-030-026 $9.36 191-030-027 $9.36 191-030-028 $9.36 191-040-001 $9.36 191-040-003 $9.36 191-040-006 $9.36 191-040-009 $9.36 191-040-010 $9.36 191-040-011 $9.36 191-040-012 $9.36 191-040-014 $9.36 191-040-015 $9.36 191-040-016 $9.36 191-040-017 $9.36 191-040-018 $9.36 191-040-019 $9.36 191-040-021 $9.36 191-040-023 $4.68 191-040-024 $9.36 191-040-025 $9.36 191-040-028 $9.36 191-040-029 $9.36 191-040-030 $9.36 191-040-031 $9.36 191-040-032 $9.36 191-040-034 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-050-006 $9.36 191-050-008 $9.36 191-050-009 $9.36 191-050-011 $9.36 191-050-012 $9.36 191-050-015 $9.36 191-050-018 $9.36 191-050-021 $9.36 191-050-022 $9.36 191-050-023 $9.36 191-050-024 $9.36 191-050-026 $9.36 191-050-027 $4.68 191-050-030 $9.36 191-050-033 $9.36 191-050-035 $9.36 191-050-036 $9.36 191-050-041 $9.36 191-050-042 $9.36 191-050-043 $9.36 191-050-044 $9.36 191-050-045 $4.68 191-050-046 $9.36 191-050-047 $9.36 191-050-048 $9.36 191-050-051 $9.36 191-050-052 $9.36 191-050-053 $9.36 191-050-054 $9.36 191-050-055 $9.36 191-050-056 $9.36 191-061-001 $9.36 191-061-004 $9.36 191-061-005 $9.36 191-061-006 $9.36 191-061-007 $9.36 191-061-008 $9.36 191-061-009 $9.36 191-061-010 $9.36 191-062-001 $9.36 191-062-002 $9.36 191-062-003 $9.36 191-062-004 $9.36 191-062-007 $9.36 191-062-008 $9.36 191-062-009 $9.36 191-062-010 $9.36 191-062-011 $9.36 191-062-012 $9.36 191-062-013 $9.36 191-062-014 $9.36 191-062-015 $9.36 191-062-016 $9.36 191-062-017 $9.36 191-062-018 $9.36 191-062-019 $9.36 40 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-062-020 $9.36 191-062-022 $9.36 191-062-025 $9.36 191-062-026 $9.36 191-062-027 $9.36 191-062-028 $9.36 191-070-002 $9.36 191-070-006 $9.36 191-070-008 $9.36 191-070-009 $9.36 191-070-010 $9.36 191-070-011 $9.36 191-070-014 $9.36 191-070-015 $9.36 191-070-016 $9.36 191-070-017 $9.36 191-070-018 $9.36 191-070-019 $9.36 191-071-001 $9.36 191-071-002 $9.36 191-071-003 $9.36 191-071-004 $9.36 191-071-005 $9.36 191-071-006 $9.36 191-071-007 $9.36 191-071-008 $9.36 191-071-009 $9.36 191-080-001 $9.36 191-080-002 $9.36 191-080-003 $9.36 191-080-004 $9.36 191-080-005 $9.36 191-080-006 $9.36 191-080-007 $9.36 191-080-011 $9.36 191-080-012 $9.36 191-080-013 $9.36 191-080-015 $9.36 191-080-021 $9.36 191-080-024 $9.36 191-080-026 $9.36 191-080-027 $9.36 191-080-030 $9.36 191-080-031 $9.36 191-080-032 $9.36 191-080-033 $9.36 191-080-034 $9.36 191-080-035 $9.36 191-080-036 $9.36 191-080-037 $9.36 191-080-038 $9.36 191-080-039 $9.36 191-080-040 $9.36 191-080-041 $9.36 191-080-042 $9.36 191-080-046 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-080-047 $9.36 191-080-048 $9.36 191-080-049 $9.36 191-080-050 $9.36 191-080-051 $14.04 191-093-006 $9.36 191-093-007 $9.36 191-093-008 $9.36 191-093-009 $9.36 191-093-010 $9.36 191-093-013 $9.36 191-093-014 $9.36 191-093-015 $9.36 191-093-016 $9.36 191-093-017 $9.36 191-093-019 $9.36 191-093-020 $9.36 191-093-021 $9.36 191-093-022 $9.36 191-093-028 $9.36 191-093-030 $9.36 191-093-031 $9.36 191-093-032 $9.36 191-093-033 $9.36 191-093-036 $9.36 191-093-037 $9.36 191-093-043 $14.04 191-093-044 $9.36 191-093-045 $9.36 191-093-046 $9.36 191-093-049 $11.14 191-093-050 $4.68 191-094-001 $9.36 191-094-002 $9.36 191-094-003 $9.36 191-094-004 $9.36 191-094-005 $9.36 191-094-006 $9.36 191-094-007 $9.36 191-094-008 $9.36 191-094-009 $9.36 191-094-010 $9.36 191-094-011 $9.36 191-094-012 $9.36 191-095-003 $9.36 191-095-004 $9.36 191-095-005 $9.36 191-095-006 $9.36 191-095-007 $9.36 191-095-008 $9.36 191-095-009 $9.36 191-095-010 $9.36 191-095-011 $9.36 191-095-012 $9.36 191-100-001 $9.36 191-100-004 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-100-005 $9.36 191-110-002 $9.36 191-110-006 $9.36 191-110-008 $9.36 191-110-009 $9.36 191-110-010 $9.36 191-120-010 $9.36 191-120-012 $9.36 191-120-013 $9.36 191-120-015 $4.68 191-120-016 $9.36 191-120-017 $4.68 191-130-001 $9.36 191-130-002 $9.36 191-130-003 $9.36 191-130-005 $9.36 191-130-006 $4.68 191-150-001 $9.36 191-150-009 $9.36 191-150-010 $9.36 191-150-011 $9.36 191-161-001 $9.36 191-161-002 $9.36 191-161-003 $9.36 191-162-004 $9.36 191-162-005 $9.36 191-162-006 $9.36 191-170-001 $9.36 191-170-002 $9.36 191-170-003 $9.36 191-170-004 $9.36 191-170-005 $9.36 191-170-006 $9.36 191-170-007 $9.36 191-170-008 $9.36 191-170-009 $9.36 191-170-010 $9.36 191-170-011 $9.36 191-170-012 $9.36 191-170-013 $9.36 191-170-014 $9.36 191-170-015 $9.36 191-170-016 $9.36 191-170-017 $9.36 191-170-018 $9.36 191-170-019 $9.36 191-170-020 $9.36 191-170-021 $9.36 191-170-022 $9.36 191-180-001 $9.36 191-180-002 $9.36 191-180-003 $9.36 191-180-004 $9.36 191-180-005 $9.36 191-180-006 $9.36 191-180-007 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 191-180-008 $9.36 191-180-009 $9.36 191-180-010 $9.36 191-180-011 $9.36 191-180-012 $9.36 191-180-013 $9.36 191-180-014 $9.36 191-180-015 $9.36 191-180-016 $9.36 191-180-017 $9.36 191-190-001 $4.68 191-190-002 $4.68 191-190-003 $4.68 191-190-004 $4.68 191-190-005 $4.68 191-190-006 $4.68 191-190-007 $4.68 191-190-008 $4.68 191-190-009 $4.68 191-190-010 $4.68 191-190-011 $4.68 191-190-012 $4.68 191-190-013 $4.68 191-190-014 $4.68 191-190-015 $4.68 191-190-016 $4.68 191-190-017 $4.68 191-190-018 $4.68 191-190-019 $4.68 191-200-001 $4.68 191-200-002 $4.68 191-200-003 $4.68 191-200-004 $4.68 191-200-005 $4.68 191-200-006 $4.68 191-200-007 $4.68 191-200-008 $4.68 191-210-001 $4.68 191-210-002 $4.68 191-210-003 $4.68 191-210-004 $4.68 191-210-005 $4.68 191-210-006 $4.68 191-210-007 $4.68 191-210-008 $4.68 191-210-009 $4.68 191-210-010 $4.68 192-011-006 $9.36 192-011-009 $9.36 192-011-010 $9.36 192-011-011 $9.36 192-011-012 $9.36 192-011-013 $9.36 192-011-014 $9.36 192-011-015 $9.36 192-011-020 $9.36 41 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-011-027 $9.36 192-011-032 $9.36 192-011-041 $9.36 192-011-043 $9.36 192-011-046 $9.36 192-011-047 $9.36 192-011-048 $9.36 192-011-049 $9.36 192-011-050 $9.36 192-011-051 $9.36 192-011-052 $9.36 192-011-053 $9.36 192-011-054 $9.36 192-011-057 $9.36 192-012-001 $9.36 192-012-002 $9.36 192-012-003 $9.36 192-012-004 $9.36 192-012-005 $9.36 192-012-006 $9.36 192-012-007 $9.36 192-012-008 $9.36 192-020-001 $9.36 192-020-002 $9.36 192-020-003 $9.36 192-020-004 $9.36 192-020-005 $9.36 192-020-007 $9.36 192-020-008 $9.36 192-020-009 $9.36 192-020-010 $9.36 192-020-011 $9.36 192-020-012 $9.36 192-020-013 $9.36 192-020-014 $9.36 192-020-015 $9.36 192-020-016 $9.36 192-020-017 $9.36 192-020-018 $9.36 192-020-019 $9.36 192-020-021 $9.36 192-020-022 $9.36 192-020-027 $9.36 192-020-028 $9.36 192-020-029 $9.36 192-020-030 $9.36 192-020-031 $9.36 192-020-032 $9.36 192-020-033 $9.36 192-020-034 $9.36 192-020-035 $9.36 192-020-036 $9.36 192-020-037 $9.36 192-020-039 $9.36 192-020-041 $9.36 192-020-045 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-020-046 $9.36 192-020-047 $9.36 192-020-048 $9.36 192-020-049 $9.36 192-020-050 $9.36 192-020-051 $9.36 192-020-052 $9.36 192-020-053 $9.36 192-020-054 $9.36 192-020-055 $9.36 192-030-002 $9.36 192-030-003 $9.36 192-030-004 $9.36 192-030-005 $9.36 192-030-006 $9.36 192-030-007 $9.36 192-030-011 $9.36 192-030-012 $9.36 192-030-013 $9.36 192-030-014 $9.36 192-030-015 $9.36 192-030-016 $9.36 192-030-017 $9.36 192-030-018 $9.36 192-030-020 $9.36 192-030-021 $9.36 192-030-022 $9.36 192-030-023 $9.36 192-030-024 $9.36 192-030-025 $9.36 192-030-026 $9.36 192-030-030 $9.36 192-030-033 $9.36 192-030-036 $9.36 192-030-037 $9.36 192-030-040 $9.36 192-030-041 $9.36 192-030-042 $9.36 192-030-043 $9.36 192-030-044 $9.36 192-030-045 $9.36 192-030-048 $9.36 192-030-049 $9.36 192-030-050 $9.36 192-030-051 $9.36 192-030-054 $9.36 192-030-055 $9.36 192-030-056 $9.36 192-041-001 $9.36 192-041-002 $9.36 192-041-004 $9.36 192-041-005 $9.36 192-041-007 $9.36 192-041-008 $9.36 192-041-009 $9.36 192-041-010 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-041-011 $9.36 192-041-012 $9.36 192-041-013 $9.36 192-041-014 $9.36 192-041-015 $9.36 192-041-016 $9.36 192-041-017 $9.36 192-041-018 $9.36 192-041-019 $9.36 192-041-020 $9.36 192-041-021 $9.36 192-041-022 $9.36 192-041-023 $9.36 192-042-001 $9.36 192-042-002 $9.36 192-042-003 $9.36 192-042-004 $9.36 192-042-005 $9.36 192-042-006 $9.36 192-042-007 $9.36 192-042-008 $9.36 192-042-009 $9.36 192-042-010 $9.36 192-050-001 $9.36 192-050-002 $9.36 192-050-003 $9.36 192-050-004 $9.36 192-050-005 $9.36 192-050-006 $9.36 192-050-007 $9.36 192-050-008 $9.36 192-050-009 $9.36 192-050-012 $9.36 192-050-013 $9.36 192-050-014 $9.36 192-050-016 $9.36 192-050-017 $9.36 192-050-018 $9.36 192-050-020 $9.36 192-050-021 $9.36 192-050-022 $9.36 192-050-023 $9.36 192-050-024 $9.36 192-050-025 $9.36 192-050-026 $9.36 192-050-027 $9.36 192-060-001 $9.36 192-060-002 $9.36 192-060-004 $9.36 192-060-005 $9.36 192-060-009 $9.36 192-060-011 $9.36 192-060-014 $9.36 192-060-016 $9.36 192-060-017 $9.36 192-060-022 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-060-023 $9.36 192-060-026 $9.36 192-060-027 $9.36 192-060-033 $9.36 192-071-005 $9.36 192-071-006 $9.36 192-071-007 $9.36 192-071-008 $9.36 192-071-015 $9.36 192-071-016 $9.36 192-071-017 $9.36 192-071-018 $9.36 192-071-019 $9.36 192-071-020 $9.36 192-071-021 $9.36 192-071-022 $9.36 192-071-024 $9.36 192-071-025 $9.36 192-071-030 $9.36 192-071-036 $9.36 192-071-046 $9.36 192-071-047 $9.36 192-071-048 $9.36 192-071-049 $9.36 192-071-050 $9.36 192-071-051 $9.36 192-071-052 $9.36 192-071-053 $9.36 192-071-054 $9.36 192-071-055 $9.36 192-071-056 $9.36 192-071-057 $9.36 192-071-058 $9.36 192-071-059 $9.36 192-071-060 $9.36 192-071-061 $9.36 192-071-062 $9.64 192-071-064 $19.84 192-071-066 $9.36 192-071-067 $9.36 192-072-003 $9.36 192-072-008 $9.36 192-072-009 $9.36 192-072-011 $9.36 192-072-013 $9.36 192-072-015 $9.36 192-072-020 $9.36 192-072-021 $9.36 192-081-003 $9.36 192-081-004 $28.08 192-082-001 $9.36 192-082-002 $9.36 192-082-003 $9.36 192-082-005 $4.68 192-090-003 $9.36 192-090-004 $9.36 42 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-090-005 $9.36 192-090-006 $9.36 192-090-007 $9.36 192-090-008 $9.36 192-090-009 $9.36 192-090-010 $9.36 192-090-011 $9.36 192-090-012 $9.36 192-090-013 $9.36 192-090-014 $9.36 192-090-015 $9.36 192-090-016 $9.36 192-090-017 $9.36 192-090-018 $9.36 192-090-019 $9.36 192-110-004 $9.36 192-110-006 $9.36 192-110-007 $9.36 192-110-009 $9.36 192-110-010 $9.36 192-110-011 $9.36 192-110-014 $9.36 192-110-018 $9.36 192-110-019 $9.36 192-110-020 $9.36 192-110-021 $9.36 192-110-022 $9.36 192-110-023 $9.36 192-110-024 $16.38 192-120-001 $9.36 192-120-002 $9.36 192-120-003 $9.36 192-120-012 $9.36 192-120-013 $9.36 192-120-014 $9.36 192-120-018 $9.36 192-120-026 $9.36 192-120-027 $9.36 192-120-028 $9.36 192-120-030 $9.36 192-120-031 $9.36 192-120-034 $9.36 192-120-035 $9.36 192-120-036 $9.36 192-120-037 $9.36 192-120-039 $9.36 192-120-040 $9.36 192-120-041 $9.36 192-120-042 $9.36 192-120-043 $9.36 192-120-044 $9.36 192-120-045 $9.36 192-120-046 $9.36 192-120-047 $9.36 192-131-001 $9.36 192-132-001 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-132-002 $9.36 192-133-002 $9.36 192-133-003 $9.36 192-133-004 $9.36 192-134-001 $9.36 192-134-002 $9.36 192-134-003 $9.36 192-134-004 $9.36 192-134-005 $9.36 192-134-006 $9.36 192-134-007 $9.36 192-134-009 $9.36 192-134-012 $9.36 192-134-013 $9.36 192-134-014 $9.36 192-134-015 $9.36 192-134-016 $9.36 192-134-017 $9.36 192-134-020 $9.36 192-134-022 $9.36 192-134-026 $9.36 192-134-027 $9.36 192-134-030 $9.36 192-134-031 $9.36 192-134-032 $9.36 192-134-033 $9.36 192-134-034 $9.36 192-134-035 $9.36 192-134-036 $9.36 192-134-037 $9.36 192-141-001 $9.36 192-141-002 $9.36 192-141-003 $9.36 192-141-004 $9.36 192-141-005 $9.36 192-141-009 $9.36 192-142-008 $9.36 192-142-009 $9.36 192-142-010 $9.36 192-142-011 $9.36 192-142-012 $9.36 192-142-013 $9.36 192-142-014 $9.36 192-142-015 $9.36 192-142-016 $9.36 192-142-017 $9.36 192-142-023 $9.36 192-142-027 $9.36 192-142-028 $9.36 192-142-029 $9.36 192-142-030 $9.36 192-142-031 $9.36 192-142-032 $9.36 192-142-035 $9.36 192-142-036 $9.36 192-142-037 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-142-038 $9.36 192-150-009 $9.36 192-150-010 $9.36 192-150-011 $9.36 192-150-013 $9.36 192-150-014 $9.36 192-150-015 $9.36 192-150-016 $9.36 192-150-029 $9.36 192-150-031 $9.36 192-150-033 $9.36 192-161-001 $9.36 192-161-002 $9.36 192-161-003 $9.36 192-161-004 $9.36 192-161-005 $9.36 192-161-006 $9.36 192-161-007 $9.36 192-162-001 $9.36 192-162-002 $9.36 192-162-003 $9.36 192-162-004 $9.36 192-162-005 $9.36 192-162-006 $9.36 192-162-007 $9.36 192-162-008 $9.36 192-162-009 $9.36 192-162-010 $9.36 192-162-011 $9.36 192-162-012 $9.36 192-163-001 $9.36 192-163-002 $9.36 192-163-003 $9.36 192-163-004 $9.36 192-164-001 $9.36 192-164-002 $9.36 192-164-003 $9.36 192-164-004 $9.36 192-164-005 $9.36 192-164-006 $9.36 192-164-007 $9.36 192-164-008 $9.36 192-164-009 $9.36 192-164-010 $9.36 192-164-011 $9.36 192-170-044 $9.36 192-170-045 $9.36 192-170-046 $9.36 192-170-047 $9.36 192-170-053 $9.36 192-170-054 $9.36 192-170-055 $9.36 192-170-057 $9.36 192-170-058 $9.36 192-181-001 $9.36 192-181-002 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-181-003 $9.36 192-181-004 $9.36 192-181-005 $9.36 192-181-006 $9.36 192-181-007 $9.36 192-182-001 $9.36 192-182-002 $9.36 192-182-003 $9.36 192-182-004 $9.36 192-182-005 $9.36 192-182-006 $9.36 192-191-001 $9.36 192-191-002 $9.36 192-191-003 $9.36 192-191-004 $9.36 192-191-005 $9.36 192-192-001 $9.36 192-192-002 $9.36 192-192-003 $9.36 192-192-004 $9.36 192-192-005 $9.36 192-192-006 $9.36 192-192-007 $9.36 192-192-008 $9.36 192-192-009 $9.36 192-192-010 $9.36 192-192-011 $9.36 192-192-012 $9.36 192-192-013 $9.36 192-192-014 $9.36 192-200-006 $4.68 192-200-007 $9.36 192-200-008 $9.36 192-200-009 $9.36 192-200-010 $9.36 192-200-013 $9.36 192-200-022 $9.36 192-200-027 $9.36 192-200-028 $9.36 192-200-036 $9.36 192-200-037 $4.68 192-200-038 $9.36 192-200-039 $9.36 192-200-040 $9.36 192-200-041 $9.36 192-200-042 $9.36 192-200-043 $9.36 192-200-044 $9.36 192-200-047 $9.36 192-200-049 $9.36 192-200-052 $4.68 192-200-054 $9.36 192-200-055 $9.36 192-210-002 $9.36 192-210-006 $9.36 192-210-007 $9.36 43 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-210-011 $9.36 192-210-013 $9.36 192-210-014 $9.36 192-210-016 $9.36 192-210-019 $9.36 192-210-020 $9.36 192-210-021 $9.36 192-210-022 $9.36 192-210-023 $9.36 192-210-024 $9.36 192-210-025 $9.36 192-210-027 $9.36 192-210-028 $9.36 192-210-029 $9.36 192-210-030 $9.36 192-210-031 $9.36 192-220-009 $9.36 192-220-012 $9.36 192-220-013 $9.36 192-220-014 $9.36 192-220-015 $9.36 192-220-016 $9.36 192-220-017 $9.36 192-220-018 $9.36 192-220-019 $9.36 192-220-020 $9.36 192-220-021 $9.36 192-220-022 $9.36 192-220-023 $9.36 192-220-024 $9.36 192-230-003 $9.36 192-230-008 $9.36 192-230-009 $9.36 192-230-013 $9.36 192-230-014 $4.68 192-230-015 $9.36 192-230-016 $9.36 192-230-019 $9.36 192-230-020 $9.36 192-230-023 $9.36 192-230-024 $9.36 192-230-026 $9.36 192-230-027 $9.36 192-230-028 $9.36 192-230-029 $9.36 192-230-030 $9.36 192-230-031 $9.36 192-230-032 $9.36 192-230-033 $9.36 192-230-034 $9.36 192-230-035 $9.36 192-240-005 $9.36 192-240-011 $9.36 192-240-014 $9.36 192-240-015 $9.36 192-240-016 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-240-018 $9.36 192-240-019 $9.36 192-240-020 $9.36 192-240-021 $9.36 192-240-022 $9.36 192-240-023 $9.36 192-240-024 $9.36 192-240-025 $4.68 192-250-002 $9.36 192-260-008 $9.36 192-260-010 $9.36 192-260-011 $9.36 192-260-014 $4.68 192-260-019 $9.36 192-260-020 $4.68 192-260-021 $9.36 192-260-022 $4.68 192-260-023 $9.36 192-260-024 $9.36 192-271-003 $9.36 192-271-013 $9.36 192-271-014 $9.36 192-271-016 $9.36 192-271-018 $9.36 192-271-019 $9.36 192-271-021 $9.36 192-271-022 $9.36 192-271-023 $9.36 192-271-024 $9.36 192-272-011 $9.36 192-272-012 $9.36 192-272-013 $9.36 192-272-014 $9.36 192-280-003 $9.36 192-280-008 $9.36 192-280-009 $9.36 192-280-010 $9.36 192-280-012 $9.36 192-280-013 $9.36 192-280-015 $9.36 192-280-016 $9.36 192-280-017 $9.36 192-280-018 $9.36 192-290-004 $9.36 192-290-010 $9.36 192-290-011 $9.36 192-290-012 $9.36 192-290-013 $9.36 192-290-014 $9.36 192-290-015 $9.36 192-290-016 $9.36 192-290-017 $9.36 192-290-018 $9.36 192-290-019 $9.36 192-290-020 $9.36 192-290-021 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-290-022 $9.36 192-290-023 $9.36 192-290-024 $9.36 192-300-001 $9.36 192-300-005 $9.36 192-300-006 $9.36 192-300-007 $9.36 192-300-008 $9.36 192-300-013 $9.36 192-300-014 $9.36 192-300-015 $9.36 192-300-016 $9.36 192-300-017 $9.36 192-300-018 $9.36 192-300-019 $9.36 192-300-020 $9.36 192-300-021 $9.36 192-300-022 $9.36 192-300-023 $9.36 192-300-024 $9.36 192-300-025 $9.36 192-300-026 $9.36 192-300-027 $9.36 192-310-001 $9.36 192-310-002 $9.36 192-310-005 $9.36 192-310-007 $9.36 192-310-009 $9.36 192-310-011 $9.36 192-310-012 $9.36 192-310-015 $9.36 192-310-016 $9.36 192-310-017 $9.36 192-310-020 $9.36 192-310-021 $9.36 192-310-022 $9.36 192-310-023 $9.36 192-310-024 $9.36 192-310-025 $9.36 192-320-002 $9.36 192-320-003 $9.36 192-320-005 $9.36 192-320-006 $9.36 192-320-007 $9.36 192-320-010 $9.36 192-320-011 $9.36 192-320-012 $9.36 192-320-013 $9.36 192-320-014 $9.36 192-331-001 $9.36 192-331-002 $9.36 192-331-003 $9.36 192-331-004 $9.36 192-331-005 $9.36 192-331-006 $9.36 192-331-007 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 192-331-008 $9.36 192-331-009 $9.36 192-332-001 $9.36 192-332-002 $9.36 192-332-003 $9.36 192-332-006 $9.36 192-332-007 $9.36 192-332-008 $9.36 192-333-001 $9.36 192-333-002 $9.36 192-333-003 $9.36 192-333-004 $9.36 192-333-005 $9.36 192-340-001 $9.36 192-340-002 $9.36 192-340-003 $9.36 192-340-004 $9.36 192-340-005 $9.36 192-340-006 $9.36 192-340-007 $9.36 192-340-008 $9.36 192-340-009 $9.36 192-340-010 $9.36 192-340-011 $9.36 192-340-012 $9.36 192-340-013 $9.36 192-340-014 $9.36 192-340-015 $9.36 192-340-016 $9.36 192-340-017 $9.36 192-340-018 $9.36 192-350-001 $9.36 192-350-002 $9.36 192-350-003 $9.36 192-350-004 $9.36 192-360-001 $9.36 192-360-002 $9.36 192-360-003 $9.36 192-360-004 $4.68 192-360-005 $9.36 192-360-006 $9.36 192-360-007 $9.36 192-360-008 $9.36 192-360-009 $9.36 192-360-010 $9.36 192-370-001 $9.36 192-370-002 $9.36 192-370-003 $9.36 192-370-004 $9.36 193-010-005 $9.36 193-010-013 $9.36 193-010-014 $9.36 193-010-023 $9.36 193-010-024 $4.68 193-010-025 $9.36 193-010-026 $9.36 44 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-010-027 $4.68 193-010-028 $9.36 193-010-029 $4.68 193-010-030 $4.68 193-010-031 $9.36 193-010-032 $4.68 193-010-033 $4.68 193-010-034 $9.36 193-010-035 $9.36 193-010-036 $9.36 193-010-037 $9.36 193-010-038 $9.36 193-010-039 $9.36 193-020-002 $9.36 193-020-009 $9.36 193-020-010 $9.36 193-020-011 $9.36 193-020-012 $9.36 193-020-014 $9.36 193-020-015 $9.36 193-030-004 $9.36 193-030-005 $9.36 193-030-006 $9.36 193-030-010 $9.36 193-030-016 $9.36 193-030-017 $9.36 193-030-018 $9.36 193-030-019 $9.36 193-030-020 $4.68 193-030-021 $4.68 193-030-022 $9.36 193-030-026 $9.36 193-030-028 $9.36 193-050-003 $9.36 193-050-004 $9.36 193-050-005 $9.36 193-050-008 $9.36 193-050-009 $9.36 193-050-010 $9.36 193-050-011 $9.36 193-050-018 $9.36 193-050-019 $9.36 193-050-020 $9.36 193-050-022 $9.36 193-050-023 $9.36 193-050-024 $9.36 193-050-025 $9.36 193-050-026 $9.36 193-050-027 $9.36 193-050-028 $9.36 193-050-029 $9.36 193-050-030 $9.36 193-060-003 $9.36 193-060-008 $9.36 193-060-010 $9.36 193-060-011 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-060-012 $9.36 193-060-014 $9.36 193-060-015 $9.36 193-060-016 $9.36 193-060-018 $9.36 193-060-019 $9.36 193-060-020 $9.36 193-060-022 $9.36 193-060-025 $9.36 193-060-026 $9.36 193-060-027 $4.68 193-060-028 $9.36 193-060-029 $9.36 193-060-030 $9.36 193-060-031 $9.36 193-060-032 $9.36 193-070-022 $9.36 193-070-028 $9.36 193-070-029 $9.36 193-070-030 $9.36 193-070-031 $9.36 193-070-032 $9.36 193-070-033 $9.36 193-070-034 $9.36 193-070-035 $9.36 193-070-036 $9.36 193-070-037 $9.36 193-070-038 $9.36 193-070-039 $9.36 193-070-040 $9.36 193-070-041 $9.36 193-070-042 $9.36 193-070-043 $9.36 193-070-044 $9.36 193-070-045 $9.36 193-080-002 $9.36 193-080-013 $9.36 193-080-015 $4.68 193-080-016 $9.36 193-080-025 $9.36 193-080-026 $9.36 193-080-027 $9.36 193-080-030 $9.36 193-080-032 $9.36 193-080-037 $9.36 193-080-042 $9.36 193-080-043 $9.36 193-080-044 $9.36 193-080-045 $9.36 193-080-046 $9.36 193-080-051 $9.36 193-080-056 $9.36 193-080-057 $9.36 193-080-058 $9.36 193-080-059 $9.36 193-080-060 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-080-061 $9.36 193-080-063 $9.36 193-080-064 $9.36 193-080-065 $9.36 193-080-066 $9.36 193-080-072 $9.36 193-080-073 $9.36 193-080-074 $9.36 193-080-075 $9.36 193-080-091 $9.36 193-080-094 $9.36 193-080-095 $4.68 193-080-098 $9.36 193-080-105 $9.36 193-080-106 $9.36 193-080-107 $4.68 193-080-110 $9.36 193-080-113 $9.36 193-080-116 $9.36 193-080-117 $9.36 193-080-118 $9.36 193-080-120 $9.36 193-080-121 $4.68 193-080-122 $9.36 193-080-123 $9.36 193-080-124 $9.36 193-080-125 $4.68 193-090-003 $9.36 193-090-004 $9.36 193-090-008 $9.36 193-090-009 $9.36 193-090-010 $9.36 193-090-015 $9.36 193-090-016 $9.36 193-090-018 $9.36 193-090-019 $9.36 193-090-020 $9.36 193-090-021 $9.36 193-090-022 $9.36 193-090-023 $9.36 193-090-024 $9.36 193-090-025 $9.36 193-090-026 $9.36 193-090-027 $9.36 193-090-028 $9.36 193-090-029 $9.36 193-090-030 $9.36 193-090-031 $9.36 193-100-001 $9.36 193-100-002 $9.36 193-100-003 $9.36 193-100-004 $9.36 193-100-008 $9.36 193-100-009 $9.36 193-100-014 $9.36 193-100-015 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-100-016 $9.36 193-100-017 $9.36 193-100-018 $9.36 193-111-001 $9.36 193-111-002 $9.36 193-111-003 $9.36 193-111-004 $9.36 193-111-005 $9.36 193-111-006 $9.36 193-111-007 $9.36 193-111-011 $9.36 193-111-012 $9.36 193-111-013 $9.36 193-111-014 $9.36 193-111-016 $9.36 193-111-017 $9.36 193-111-018 $9.36 193-111-020 $9.36 193-111-021 $9.36 193-112-001 $9.36 193-112-004 $9.36 193-112-005 $9.36 193-112-006 $9.36 193-112-007 $9.36 193-112-008 $9.36 193-112-009 $9.36 193-112-010 $9.36 193-112-011 $9.36 193-112-012 $9.36 193-112-013 $9.36 193-112-014 $9.36 193-112-015 $9.36 193-114-001 $9.36 193-114-002 $9.36 193-130-001 $9.36 193-130-008 $9.36 193-130-009 $9.36 193-130-010 $9.36 193-130-011 $9.36 193-130-012 $9.36 193-130-013 $9.36 193-130-014 $9.36 193-130-015 $9.36 193-130-016 $9.36 193-130-017 $9.36 193-130-018 $9.36 193-130-019 $9.36 193-130-020 $9.36 193-130-021 $9.36 193-130-022 $9.36 193-130-028 $9.36 193-130-029 $9.36 193-130-031 $9.36 193-130-032 $9.36 193-140-010 $9.36 193-140-011 $9.36 45 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-140-012 $9.36 193-140-013 $9.36 193-140-014 $9.36 193-140-015 $9.36 193-140-016 $9.36 193-140-017 $9.36 193-140-018 $9.36 193-140-019 $9.36 193-140-021 $9.36 193-140-022 $9.36 193-140-023 $9.36 193-140-024 $9.36 193-140-025 $9.36 193-140-027 $9.36 193-140-028 $9.36 193-141-001 $9.36 193-141-002 $9.36 193-141-003 $9.36 193-160-018 $14.04 193-160-020 $14.04 193-170-063 $14.04 193-170-064 $7.02 193-180-024 $9.36 193-180-026 $9.36 193-180-027 $9.36 193-180-030 $9.36 193-180-032 $9.36 193-180-033 $9.36 193-180-034 $9.36 193-180-035 $9.36 193-180-036 $9.36 193-190-031 $9.36 193-190-032 $9.36 193-210-017 $9.36 193-210-018 $9.36 193-210-019 $9.36 193-210-020 $9.36 193-210-021 $9.36 193-210-022 $9.36 193-210-023 $9.36 193-210-024 $9.36 193-210-025 $9.36 193-210-029 $4.68 193-210-030 $4.68 193-210-031 $4.68 193-210-032 $4.68 193-221-004 $9.36 193-221-005 $9.36 193-221-006 $9.36 193-221-007 $9.36 193-221-008 $9.36 193-221-009 $9.36 193-221-010 $9.36 193-222-001 $9.36 193-222-002 $9.36 193-222-003 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-222-004 $9.36 193-222-005 $9.36 193-222-006 $9.36 193-222-007 $9.36 193-222-011 $9.36 193-222-012 $9.36 193-222-013 $9.36 193-222-014 $9.36 193-222-015 $9.36 193-222-016 $9.36 193-222-017 $9.36 193-222-018 $9.36 193-223-004 $4.68 193-223-005 $9.36 193-223-006 $9.36 193-223-007 $9.36 193-231-001 $9.36 193-231-002 $9.36 193-231-003 $9.36 193-232-001 $9.36 193-232-002 $9.36 193-232-003 $9.36 193-232-004 $9.36 193-232-005 $9.36 193-232-006 $9.36 193-232-007 $9.36 193-232-008 $9.36 193-232-009 $9.36 193-232-010 $9.36 193-234-001 $9.36 193-234-002 $9.36 193-234-003 $9.36 193-234-004 $9.36 193-234-005 $9.36 193-234-006 $9.36 193-234-007 $9.36 193-234-008 $9.36 193-234-009 $9.36 193-241-006 $9.36 193-241-007 $7.58 193-242-001 $9.36 193-242-002 $9.36 193-242-003 $9.36 193-242-004 $9.36 193-251-001 $9.36 193-251-002 $9.36 193-251-003 $9.36 193-251-004 $9.36 193-251-005 $9.36 193-251-009 $9.36 193-251-011 $9.36 193-251-012 $9.36 193-252-001 $9.36 193-252-002 $9.36 193-252-003 $9.36 193-252-004 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-252-008 $9.36 193-252-009 $9.36 193-252-010 $9.36 193-252-011 $9.36 193-252-012 $9.36 193-252-021 $9.36 193-252-023 $9.36 193-252-024 $9.36 193-252-026 $9.36 193-252-028 $9.36 193-252-029 $9.36 193-252-030 $4.68 193-252-031 $9.36 193-252-032 $4.68 193-252-033 $9.36 193-261-001 $9.36 193-261-002 $9.36 193-261-003 $9.36 193-261-005 $9.36 193-261-006 $9.36 193-261-007 $9.36 193-261-008 $9.36 193-261-009 $9.36 193-261-010 $9.36 193-261-011 $9.36 193-262-001 $9.36 193-262-002 $9.36 193-262-003 $9.36 193-262-004 $9.36 193-262-005 $9.36 193-262-006 $9.36 193-262-008 $14.04 193-262-022 $4.68 193-262-026 $9.36 193-262-027 $9.36 193-262-029 $9.36 193-271-001 $9.36 193-271-002 $9.36 193-271-003 $9.36 193-271-004 $9.36 193-271-005 $9.36 193-271-006 $9.36 193-271-007 $9.36 193-271-008 $9.36 193-272-001 $9.36 193-272-002 $9.36 193-272-003 $9.36 193-272-004 $9.36 193-272-005 $9.36 193-272-006 $9.36 193-272-007 $9.36 193-272-008 $9.36 193-272-009 $9.36 193-272-010 $9.36 193-272-011 $9.36 193-272-012 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-273-001 $9.36 193-273-002 $9.36 193-273-003 $9.36 193-273-004 $9.36 193-273-005 $9.36 193-273-006 $9.36 193-273-007 $9.36 193-273-008 $9.36 193-273-009 $9.36 193-273-010 $9.36 193-273-011 $9.36 193-273-012 $9.36 193-273-015 $9.36 193-273-016 $9.36 193-281-001 $9.36 193-281-002 $9.36 193-281-003 $9.36 193-281-004 $9.36 193-281-005 $9.36 193-281-006 $9.36 193-281-007 $9.36 193-281-008 $9.36 193-281-009 $9.36 193-281-010 $9.36 193-282-001 $9.36 193-282-002 $9.36 193-282-003 $9.36 193-282-004 $9.36 193-282-005 $9.36 193-282-006 $9.36 193-282-011 $9.36 193-282-012 $9.36 193-282-014 $9.36 193-282-017 $9.36 193-282-018 $9.36 193-282-019 $9.36 193-283-001 $9.36 193-283-002 $9.36 193-283-003 $9.36 193-283-004 $9.36 193-283-005 $9.36 193-283-006 $9.36 193-283-007 $9.36 193-283-008 $9.36 193-283-009 $9.36 193-283-010 $9.36 193-284-001 $9.36 193-284-002 $9.36 193-284-003 $9.36 193-284-004 $9.36 193-284-005 $9.36 193-284-006 $9.36 193-285-001 $9.36 193-285-002 $9.36 193-285-003 $9.36 193-291-002 $9.36 46 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-291-003 $9.36 193-291-004 $4.68 193-292-002 $9.36 193-292-003 $9.36 193-292-004 $9.36 193-292-005 $9.36 193-292-006 $9.36 193-293-001 $9.36 193-293-002 $9.36 193-293-003 $9.36 193-293-004 $9.36 193-293-005 $9.36 193-293-006 $9.36 193-293-007 $9.36 193-301-002 $9.36 193-301-003 $9.36 193-301-005 $9.36 193-301-006 $9.36 193-301-008 $9.36 193-302-003 $9.36 193-302-004 $9.36 193-302-005 $9.36 193-302-007 $9.36 193-302-008 $9.36 193-302-010 $9.36 193-302-011 $9.36 193-302-012 $9.36 193-302-015 $9.36 193-302-016 $9.36 193-302-018 $9.36 193-302-019 $9.36 193-302-020 $9.36 193-302-026 $9.36 193-302-027 $9.36 193-302-028 $9.36 193-302-029 $9.36 193-302-032 $9.36 193-302-033 $9.36 193-310-001 $9.36 193-310-002 $9.36 193-310-003 $9.36 193-310-004 $9.36 193-310-005 $9.36 193-310-006 $9.36 193-310-007 $9.36 193-310-008 $9.36 193-310-009 $9.36 193-310-010 $9.36 193-310-011 $9.36 193-310-012 $9.36 193-310-013 $9.36 193-310-014 $9.36 193-310-017 $9.36 193-310-018 $9.36 193-310-019 $9.36 193-310-020 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-310-021 $9.36 193-310-022 $9.36 193-310-028 $9.36 193-310-029 $9.36 193-310-030 $9.36 193-310-031 $9.36 193-310-034 $9.36 193-310-035 $9.36 193-310-036 $9.36 193-310-038 $9.36 193-310-039 $9.36 193-320-003 $9.36 193-320-004 $9.36 193-320-007 $9.36 193-320-008 $9.36 193-320-009 $9.36 193-320-010 $9.36 193-320-011 $9.36 193-320-012 $9.36 193-320-014 $9.36 193-320-015 $9.36 193-320-016 $9.36 193-331-001 $9.36 193-331-002 $9.36 193-331-003 $9.36 193-331-004 $9.36 193-331-005 $9.36 193-331-006 $9.36 193-331-007 $9.36 193-331-008 $9.36 193-331-010 $9.36 193-332-001 $9.36 193-332-002 $9.36 193-332-003 $9.36 193-333-001 $9.36 193-333-002 $9.36 193-334-001 $9.36 193-334-002 $9.36 193-334-003 $9.36 193-335-001 $9.36 193-335-002 $9.36 193-335-005 $9.36 193-335-006 $9.36 193-335-007 $9.36 193-335-008 $9.36 193-340-001 $9.36 193-340-002 $9.36 193-340-003 $9.36 193-340-004 $9.36 193-340-005 $9.36 193-340-006 $9.36 193-340-007 $9.36 193-340-009 $9.36 193-340-010 $9.36 193-340-011 $9.36 193-340-012 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-340-013 $9.36 193-340-014 $9.36 193-340-015 $9.36 193-340-017 $9.36 193-340-018 $9.36 193-340-019 $9.36 193-340-020 $9.36 193-340-021 $9.36 193-340-022 $9.36 193-340-023 $9.36 193-340-032 $9.36 193-340-036 $9.36 193-340-039 $9.36 193-340-043 $9.36 193-340-044 $9.36 193-340-045 $9.36 193-340-047 $9.36 193-340-048 $9.36 193-340-050 $9.36 193-340-051 $9.36 193-340-052 $9.36 193-350-002 $9.36 193-350-003 $9.36 193-350-004 $9.36 193-350-005 $9.36 193-350-008 $9.36 193-350-009 $9.36 193-350-010 $9.36 193-350-011 $9.36 193-350-012 $9.36 193-350-013 $9.36 193-350-014 $9.36 193-350-015 $9.36 193-350-016 $9.36 193-350-017 $9.36 193-350-020 $9.36 193-350-021 $9.36 193-350-022 $9.36 193-350-023 $9.36 193-350-024 $9.36 193-350-025 $9.36 193-350-026 $9.36 193-350-027 $9.36 193-350-028 $9.36 193-350-029 $9.36 193-350-030 $9.36 193-350-032 $9.36 193-350-033 $9.36 193-350-034 $9.36 193-350-035 $9.36 193-350-036 $9.36 193-360-001 $9.36 193-360-004 $9.36 193-360-005 $9.36 193-360-006 $9.36 193-360-007 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-360-008 $9.36 193-360-009 $9.36 193-360-010 $9.36 193-360-011 $9.36 193-360-012 $9.36 193-360-013 $9.36 193-360-014 $9.36 193-360-015 $9.36 193-360-016 $9.36 193-360-017 $9.36 193-360-018 $9.36 193-360-019 $9.36 193-370-001 $9.36 193-370-002 $9.36 193-370-003 $9.36 193-370-004 $9.36 193-370-005 $9.36 193-370-006 $9.36 193-370-007 $9.36 193-370-008 $9.36 193-370-009 $9.36 193-381-002 $9.36 193-381-003 $9.36 193-381-004 $9.36 193-381-005 $9.36 193-381-007 $9.36 193-381-008 $9.36 193-382-001 $9.36 193-382-002 $9.36 193-382-003 $9.36 193-382-004 $9.36 193-382-005 $9.36 193-383-001 $9.36 193-383-002 $9.36 193-383-003 $9.36 193-383-004 $9.36 193-383-005 $9.36 193-383-006 $9.36 193-383-007 $9.36 193-384-003 $9.36 193-384-004 $9.36 193-384-005 $9.36 193-390-001 $9.36 193-390-002 $9.36 193-390-003 $9.36 193-390-005 $9.36 193-401-002 $9.36 193-401-003 $9.36 193-401-004 $9.36 193-401-005 $9.36 193-401-006 $9.36 193-401-007 $9.36 193-401-008 $9.36 193-401-009 $9.36 193-401-010 $9.36 193-401-011 $9.36 47 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-401-012 $9.36 193-401-013 $9.36 193-401-014 $9.36 193-401-015 $9.36 193-401-016 $9.36 193-401-017 $9.36 193-401-018 $9.36 193-401-019 $9.36 193-401-022 $9.36 193-401-023 $9.36 193-401-024 $9.36 193-402-001 $9.36 193-402-002 $9.36 193-410-001 $9.36 193-410-002 $9.36 193-410-003 $9.36 193-410-004 $9.36 193-410-005 $9.36 193-410-006 $9.36 193-410-007 $9.36 193-410-008 $9.36 193-410-009 $9.36 193-410-010 $9.36 193-410-011 $9.36 193-410-012 $9.36 193-410-013 $9.36 193-421-001 $9.36 193-421-002 $9.36 193-421-003 $9.36 193-421-004 $9.36 193-421-005 $9.36 193-421-006 $9.36 193-421-007 $9.36 193-421-008 $9.36 193-421-009 $9.36 193-421-010 $9.36 193-421-011 $9.36 193-421-013 $9.36 193-422-001 $9.36 193-422-002 $9.36 193-422-003 $9.36 193-422-004 $9.36 193-422-005 $9.36 193-422-006 $9.36 193-422-007 $9.36 193-422-008 $9.36 193-422-009 $9.36 193-422-010 $9.36 193-422-011 $9.36 193-422-012 $9.36 193-422-013 $9.36 193-422-014 $9.36 193-422-015 $9.36 193-422-016 $9.36 193-430-001 $9.36 193-430-002 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-430-003 $9.36 193-430-004 $9.36 193-430-005 $9.36 193-430-006 $9.36 193-430-011 $9.36 193-430-017 $9.36 193-430-018 $9.36 193-430-019 $9.36 193-430-022 $9.36 193-430-023 $9.36 193-430-028 $9.36 193-430-030 $9.36 193-430-031 $9.36 193-430-032 $9.36 193-430-035 $9.36 193-430-036 $9.36 193-430-037 $9.36 193-430-038 $9.36 193-430-039 $9.36 193-441-001 $9.36 193-441-002 $9.36 193-441-003 $9.36 193-441-004 $9.36 193-441-006 $9.36 193-441-008 $9.36 193-441-009 $9.36 193-441-010 $9.36 193-441-011 $9.36 193-442-002 $9.36 193-442-005 $9.36 193-443-001 $9.36 193-443-002 $9.36 193-443-003 $9.36 193-443-004 $9.36 193-443-005 $9.36 193-443-006 $9.36 193-443-007 $9.36 193-443-008 $9.36 193-443-010 $9.36 193-443-011 $9.36 193-443-012 $9.36 193-443-013 $9.36 193-450-008 $4.68 193-450-011 $14.04 193-450-012 $14.04 193-460-001 $14.04 193-460-002 $9.26 193-470-005 $4.68 193-470-014 $5.42 193-470-023 $14.04 193-470-024 $14.04 193-470-025 $10.30 193-470-027 $14.04 193-482-002 $9.36 193-482-003 $9.36 193-482-004 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-482-005 $9.36 193-482-006 $9.36 193-482-007 $9.36 193-482-008 $9.36 193-482-013 $9.36 193-482-014 $9.36 193-482-016 $9.36 193-482-017 $9.36 193-482-018 $9.36 193-482-019 $9.36 193-483-001 $9.36 193-483-002 $9.36 193-483-003 $9.36 193-483-004 $9.36 193-483-005 $9.36 193-491-001 $9.36 193-491-002 $9.36 193-492-001 $9.36 193-492-002 $9.36 193-492-003 $9.36 193-492-007 $9.36 193-492-008 $9.36 193-492-009 $9.36 193-492-012 $9.36 193-492-014 $9.36 193-492-015 $9.36 193-500-002 $9.36 193-500-003 $9.36 193-500-004 $9.36 193-500-005 $9.36 193-500-006 $9.36 193-510-001 $9.36 193-510-002 $9.36 193-510-003 $9.36 193-510-008 $9.36 193-510-009 $9.36 193-510-013 $9.36 193-510-014 $9.36 193-510-015 $9.36 193-510-017 $9.36 193-510-018 $9.36 193-510-019 $9.36 193-531-001 $9.36 193-531-002 $9.36 193-531-003 $9.36 193-531-004 $9.36 193-531-005 $9.36 193-531-006 $9.36 193-531-007 $9.36 193-532-001 $9.36 193-532-002 $9.36 193-532-003 $9.36 193-532-004 $9.36 193-532-005 $9.36 193-532-006 $9.36 193-532-007 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-532-008 $9.36 193-533-002 $9.36 193-541-001 $9.36 193-541-002 $9.36 193-541-003 $9.36 193-541-004 $9.36 193-541-005 $9.36 193-541-006 $9.36 193-541-009 $9.36 193-541-010 $9.36 193-541-011 $9.36 193-541-012 $9.36 193-541-013 $9.36 193-541-014 $9.36 193-541-015 $9.36 193-541-016 $9.36 193-541-017 $9.36 193-541-018 $9.36 193-541-019 $9.36 193-541-020 $9.36 193-541-021 $9.36 193-541-022 $9.36 193-541-023 $9.36 193-541-024 $9.36 193-541-025 $9.36 193-541-026 $9.36 193-541-027 $9.36 193-541-030 $9.36 193-541-031 $9.36 193-542-001 $9.36 193-542-002 $9.36 193-542-003 $9.36 193-542-004 $9.36 193-542-005 $9.36 193-542-006 $9.36 193-542-007 $9.36 193-551-001 $9.36 193-551-002 $9.36 193-551-003 $9.36 193-552-001 $9.36 193-552-002 $9.36 193-552-003 $9.36 193-552-004 $9.36 193-552-005 $9.36 193-552-006 $9.36 193-552-007 $9.36 193-552-008 $9.36 193-552-009 $9.36 193-552-010 $9.36 193-552-013 $9.36 193-552-014 $9.36 193-552-015 $9.36 193-552-016 $9.36 193-552-017 $9.36 193-552-018 $9.36 193-552-021 $9.36 48 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-552-022 $9.36 193-552-023 $9.36 193-552-024 $9.36 193-560-002 $9.36 193-560-003 $9.36 193-560-004 $9.36 193-560-005 $9.36 193-560-006 $9.36 193-560-007 $9.36 193-560-008 $9.36 193-560-009 $9.36 193-560-010 $9.36 193-560-011 $9.36 193-560-012 $9.36 193-560-013 $9.36 193-560-014 $9.36 193-560-016 $9.36 193-570-001 $9.36 193-570-002 $9.36 193-570-003 $9.36 193-570-004 $9.36 193-570-005 $9.36 193-570-006 $9.36 193-570-009 $9.36 193-570-010 $9.36 193-570-011 $9.36 193-570-012 $9.36 193-570-015 $9.36 193-570-016 $9.36 193-570-017 $9.36 193-570-019 $9.36 193-570-020 $9.36 193-570-022 $9.36 193-570-023 $4.68 193-570-026 $9.36 193-580-001 $9.36 193-580-002 $9.36 193-580-003 $9.36 193-580-004 $9.36 193-580-005 $9.36 193-580-006 $9.36 193-580-007 $9.36 193-580-008 $9.36 193-580-009 $9.36 193-580-010 $9.36 193-580-011 $9.36 193-580-012 $9.36 193-580-013 $9.36 193-580-014 $9.36 193-580-015 $9.36 193-580-016 $9.36 193-580-017 $9.36 193-580-018 $9.36 193-591-001 $9.36 193-591-002 $9.36 193-591-003 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-592-001 $9.36 193-592-002 $9.36 193-592-003 $9.36 193-592-004 $9.36 193-592-007 $9.36 193-592-008 $9.36 193-592-009 $9.36 193-592-011 $9.36 193-592-012 $9.36 193-592-013 $9.36 193-592-014 $9.36 193-592-017 $9.36 193-600-001 $9.36 193-600-002 $9.36 193-600-003 $9.36 193-600-004 $9.36 193-600-008 $9.36 193-600-012 $9.36 193-600-013 $9.36 193-600-014 $9.36 193-611-003 $9.36 193-611-004 $9.36 193-611-005 $9.36 193-611-006 $9.36 193-611-007 $9.36 193-611-008 $9.36 193-611-009 $9.36 193-612-001 $9.36 193-612-002 $9.36 193-612-003 $9.36 193-612-004 $9.36 193-612-007 $9.36 193-612-008 $9.36 193-612-009 $9.36 193-612-010 $9.36 193-612-013 $9.36 193-612-014 $9.36 193-620-008 $9.36 193-631-001 $9.36 193-631-002 $9.36 193-631-003 $9.36 193-631-004 $9.36 193-632-001 $9.36 193-632-002 $9.36 193-632-003 $9.36 193-632-004 $9.36 193-632-005 $9.36 193-632-006 $9.36 193-632-007 $9.36 193-641-001 $9.36 193-641-002 $9.36 193-642-001 $9.36 193-642-002 $9.36 193-643-001 $9.36 193-643-002 $9.36 193-643-003 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-643-004 $9.36 193-643-005 $9.36 193-643-006 $9.36 193-643-007 $9.36 193-650-002 $9.36 193-650-003 $9.36 193-650-004 $9.36 193-650-005 $9.36 193-650-006 $9.36 193-650-007 $9.36 193-650-008 $9.36 193-650-009 $9.36 193-650-010 $9.36 193-650-011 $9.36 193-650-012 $9.36 193-650-015 $9.36 193-650-016 $9.36 193-650-017 $9.36 193-650-018 $9.36 193-650-019 $9.36 193-650-020 $9.36 193-650-021 $9.36 193-650-022 $9.36 193-650-023 $9.36 193-650-024 $9.36 193-650-025 $9.36 193-650-026 $9.36 193-650-027 $9.36 193-650-028 $9.36 193-650-029 $9.36 193-650-030 $9.36 193-650-031 $9.36 193-650-032 $9.36 193-650-033 $9.36 193-650-034 $9.36 193-650-035 $9.36 193-650-036 $9.36 193-650-037 $9.36 193-650-038 $9.36 193-650-039 $9.36 193-650-040 $9.36 193-650-041 $9.36 193-650-043 $9.36 193-650-044 $9.36 193-650-045 $9.36 193-650-046 $9.36 193-650-047 $9.36 193-650-048 $9.36 193-650-049 $9.36 193-650-050 $9.36 193-650-051 $9.36 193-650-052 $9.36 193-650-053 $9.36 193-650-054 $9.36 193-650-055 $9.36 193-660-001 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-660-002 $9.36 193-660-003 $9.36 193-660-004 $9.36 193-660-005 $9.36 193-660-006 $9.36 193-660-007 $9.36 193-660-008 $9.36 193-660-009 $9.36 193-660-010 $9.36 193-660-011 $9.36 193-660-012 $9.36 193-660-013 $9.36 193-660-014 $9.36 193-660-015 $9.36 193-660-016 $9.36 193-660-017 $9.36 193-660-018 $9.36 193-660-020 $9.36 193-660-021 $9.36 193-660-022 $9.36 193-660-023 $9.36 193-660-024 $9.36 193-660-025 $9.36 193-660-026 $9.36 193-660-027 $9.36 193-660-028 $9.36 193-660-029 $9.36 193-660-032 $9.36 193-660-033 $9.36 193-660-034 $9.36 193-660-035 $9.36 193-660-036 $9.36 193-660-037 $9.36 193-660-038 $9.36 193-660-039 $9.36 193-660-040 $9.36 193-660-041 $9.36 193-660-042 $9.36 193-660-043 $9.36 193-660-045 $9.36 193-660-046 $9.36 193-660-047 $9.36 193-660-048 $9.36 193-660-058 $9.36 193-660-059 $9.36 193-660-060 $9.36 193-660-061 $9.36 193-670-004 $9.36 193-670-009 $9.36 193-670-010 $9.36 193-670-011 $9.36 193-670-015 $9.36 193-670-016 $9.36 193-670-018 $9.36 193-670-019 $9.36 193-670-020 $9.36 49 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-680-001 $4.68 193-680-002 $4.68 193-680-003 $4.68 193-680-004 $9.36 193-680-005 $9.36 193-680-006 $9.36 193-680-007 $9.36 193-680-008 $4.68 193-680-009 $9.36 193-680-010 $9.36 193-680-011 $9.36 193-680-012 $9.36 193-680-013 $9.36 193-680-014 $9.36 193-680-017 $9.36 193-680-018 $9.36 193-680-019 $9.36 193-680-020 $9.36 193-680-021 $9.36 193-680-022 $9.36 193-680-023 $9.36 193-680-024 $9.36 193-680-025 $9.36 193-680-026 $9.36 193-680-027 $9.36 193-680-028 $9.36 193-680-029 $9.36 193-680-030 $9.36 193-680-031 $9.36 193-680-032 $4.68 193-680-033 $9.36 193-680-034 $9.36 193-680-035 $9.36 193-680-036 $9.36 193-680-037 $9.36 193-680-038 $9.36 193-680-042 $9.36 193-680-043 $9.36 193-690-001 $9.36 193-690-005 $9.36 193-690-006 $9.36 193-690-007 $9.36 193-690-009 $9.36 193-690-010 $9.36 193-690-011 $9.36 193-690-012 $9.36 193-690-013 $9.36 193-690-014 $9.36 193-690-015 $9.36 193-690-016 $9.36 193-690-018 $9.36 193-690-019 $9.36 193-690-020 $9.36 193-690-021 $9.36 193-690-022 $9.36 193-690-024 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-690-025 $9.36 193-690-026 $9.36 193-690-027 $9.36 193-690-028 $9.36 193-690-029 $9.36 193-690-031 $9.36 193-690-032 $9.36 193-690-033 $9.36 193-690-034 $9.36 193-690-035 $9.36 193-690-036 $9.36 193-690-037 $9.36 193-690-038 $9.36 193-690-039 $4.68 193-690-040 $9.36 193-690-041 $9.36 193-690-042 $9.36 193-690-043 $9.36 193-690-044 $9.36 193-690-045 $4.68 193-690-048 $9.36 193-690-049 $9.36 193-690-050 $9.36 193-690-052 $9.36 193-690-053 $9.36 193-690-059 $9.36 193-690-061 $9.36 193-690-062 $9.36 193-690-064 $9.36 193-690-066 $9.36 193-690-067 $9.36 193-690-068 $9.36 193-690-069 $9.36 193-690-070 $9.36 193-700-003 $9.36 193-700-004 $9.36 193-700-005 $9.36 193-700-006 $9.36 193-700-008 $9.36 193-700-009 $9.36 193-700-010 $9.36 193-700-011 $9.36 193-700-012 $9.36 193-700-013 $9.36 193-700-014 $9.36 193-700-015 $9.36 193-700-016 $9.36 193-700-017 $9.36 193-700-018 $9.36 193-700-019 $9.36 193-700-020 $9.36 193-700-021 $9.36 193-700-022 $9.36 193-700-023 $9.36 193-700-024 $9.36 193-700-025 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-700-027 $9.36 193-700-028 $9.36 193-700-029 $9.36 193-700-030 $9.36 193-700-031 $9.36 193-700-032 $9.36 193-700-033 $9.36 193-700-034 $9.36 193-700-035 $9.36 193-700-036 $9.36 193-700-037 $9.36 193-700-042 $9.36 193-700-043 $9.36 193-700-044 $9.36 193-700-045 $4.68 193-700-046 $9.36 193-710-008 $9.36 193-710-009 $9.36 193-710-010 $9.36 193-710-011 $9.36 193-710-012 $9.36 193-710-013 $9.36 193-710-014 $9.36 193-710-015 $9.36 193-710-016 $9.36 193-710-018 $9.36 193-710-019 $4.68 193-710-020 $9.36 193-710-021 $9.36 193-710-022 $9.36 193-710-024 $9.36 193-710-027 $9.36 193-710-029 $9.36 193-710-032 $9.36 193-710-034 $9.36 193-710-036 $9.36 193-710-038 $9.36 193-710-039 $4.68 193-710-040 $9.36 193-710-042 $9.36 193-710-044 $9.36 193-710-045 $9.36 193-710-046 $9.36 193-710-047 $9.36 193-720-001 $9.36 193-720-002 $9.36 193-720-003 $9.36 193-720-004 $9.36 193-720-005 $9.36 193-721-001 $9.36 193-721-002 $9.36 193-721-003 $9.36 193-721-004 $9.36 193-721-005 $9.36 193-722-001 $9.36 193-722-002 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-722-003 $9.36 193-722-004 $9.36 193-722-005 $9.36 193-722-006 $9.36 193-722-007 $9.36 193-722-008 $9.36 193-722-009 $9.36 193-722-010 $9.36 193-722-011 $9.36 193-723-001 $9.36 193-723-002 $9.36 193-723-003 $9.36 193-723-004 $9.36 193-723-005 $9.36 193-723-006 $9.36 193-723-007 $9.36 193-723-008 $9.36 193-723-009 $9.36 193-723-010 $9.36 193-723-011 $9.36 193-723-012 $9.36 193-723-013 $9.36 193-723-014 $9.36 193-730-001 $9.36 193-730-002 $9.36 193-730-003 $9.36 193-730-004 $9.36 193-730-005 $9.36 193-730-006 $9.36 193-730-007 $9.36 193-730-008 $9.36 193-730-011 $9.36 193-730-012 $9.36 193-730-013 $9.36 193-730-014 $9.36 193-730-015 $9.36 193-730-016 $9.36 193-730-017 $9.36 193-730-018 $9.36 193-730-019 $9.36 193-730-021 $9.36 193-730-022 $9.36 193-731-001 $9.36 193-731-002 $9.36 193-740-001 $9.36 193-740-002 $9.36 193-740-003 $9.36 193-740-004 $9.36 193-740-005 $9.36 193-740-007 $9.36 193-740-008 $9.36 193-740-009 $9.36 193-740-010 $9.36 193-740-011 $9.36 193-740-012 $9.36 193-740-014 $9.36 50 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-740-015 $9.36 193-740-016 $9.36 193-740-017 $9.36 193-740-018 $9.36 193-740-019 $9.36 193-740-020 $9.36 193-740-021 $9.36 193-740-022 $9.36 193-740-023 $9.36 193-740-024 $9.36 193-740-025 $9.36 193-740-026 $9.36 193-740-027 $9.36 193-741-001 $9.36 193-741-002 $9.36 193-741-003 $9.36 193-741-004 $9.36 193-741-005 $9.36 193-741-006 $9.36 193-750-004 $9.36 193-750-005 $9.36 193-750-006 $9.36 193-750-017 $9.36 193-750-018 $9.36 193-750-019 $9.36 193-750-020 $9.36 193-760-004 $9.36 193-760-005 $4.68 193-760-007 $9.36 193-760-009 $9.36 193-760-010 $9.36 193-770-001 $9.36 193-770-002 $9.36 193-770-010 $9.36 193-770-011 $9.36 193-770-012 $9.36 193-770-013 $9.36 193-770-014 $9.36 193-781-001 $9.36 193-781-002 $9.36 193-781-003 $9.36 193-781-004 $9.36 193-781-005 $9.36 193-781-006 $9.36 193-781-007 $9.36 193-781-008 $9.36 193-781-009 $9.36 193-781-010 $9.36 193-781-011 $9.36 193-781-012 $9.36 193-781-013 $9.36 193-781-014 $9.36 193-781-015 $9.36 193-781-016 $9.36 193-781-017 $9.36 193-782-001 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-783-001 $9.36 193-783-002 $9.36 193-783-003 $9.36 193-783-004 $9.36 193-783-005 $9.36 193-790-001 $9.36 193-790-002 $9.36 193-790-003 $9.36 193-790-004 $9.36 193-790-006 $9.36 193-790-007 $9.36 193-790-008 $9.36 193-790-009 $9.36 193-790-011 $9.36 193-801-001 $9.36 193-801-002 $9.36 193-801-003 $9.36 193-801-004 $9.36 193-801-005 $9.36 193-801-006 $9.36 193-801-007 $9.36 193-801-008 $9.36 193-801-009 $9.36 193-801-010 $9.36 193-801-011 $9.36 193-801-012 $9.36 193-801-013 $9.36 193-801-014 $9.36 193-801-015 $9.36 193-801-016 $9.36 193-801-017 $9.36 193-801-018 $9.36 193-801-019 $9.36 193-801-020 $9.36 193-801-021 $9.36 193-801-022 $9.36 193-801-023 $9.36 193-801-026 $9.36 193-801-027 $9.36 193-811-001 $9.36 193-811-002 $9.36 193-811-003 $9.36 193-811-004 $9.36 193-811-005 $9.36 193-811-006 $9.36 193-811-007 $9.36 193-811-008 $9.36 193-811-009 $9.36 193-811-025 $9.36 193-811-026 $9.36 193-811-027 $9.36 193-811-028 $9.36 193-811-035 $9.36 193-811-036 $9.36 193-811-037 $9.36 193-811-038 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-811-039 $9.36 193-811-040 $9.36 193-811-041 $9.36 193-811-042 $9.36 193-811-043 $9.36 193-811-044 $9.36 193-811-045 $9.36 193-811-046 $9.36 193-811-047 $9.36 193-811-048 $9.36 193-811-049 $9.36 193-811-050 $9.36 193-811-051 $9.36 193-811-052 $9.36 193-811-053 $9.36 193-811-054 $9.36 193-812-012 $9.36 193-812-013 $9.36 193-812-014 $9.36 193-812-015 $9.36 193-812-016 $9.36 193-812-017 $9.36 193-812-018 $9.36 193-812-019 $9.36 193-812-020 $9.36 193-812-021 $9.36 193-820-002 $9.36 193-820-003 $9.36 193-820-004 $9.36 193-820-005 $9.36 193-820-015 $9.36 193-820-016 $9.36 193-820-017 $9.36 193-820-018 $9.36 193-820-019 $9.36 193-820-020 $9.36 193-820-021 $9.36 193-820-022 $9.36 193-840-001 $9.36 193-840-002 $9.36 193-840-003 $9.36 193-840-004 $9.36 193-840-005 $9.36 193-840-006 $9.36 193-840-007 $9.36 193-840-010 $9.36 193-840-011 $9.36 193-840-012 $9.36 193-840-013 $9.36 193-840-014 $9.36 193-840-015 $9.36 193-840-016 $9.36 193-840-017 $9.36 193-840-018 $9.36 193-840-019 $9.36 193-840-020 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-840-021 $9.36 193-840-022 $9.36 193-840-023 $9.36 193-840-024 $9.36 193-840-025 $9.36 193-840-026 $9.36 193-840-027 $9.36 193-850-001 $9.36 193-850-002 $9.36 193-850-004 $9.36 193-850-005 $9.36 193-850-006 $9.36 193-850-007 $9.36 193-850-008 $9.36 193-850-010 $9.36 193-850-011 $9.36 193-850-012 $9.36 193-850-013 $9.36 193-850-014 $9.36 193-850-015 $9.36 193-850-016 $9.36 193-850-017 $9.36 193-861-001 $9.36 193-861-002 $9.36 193-861-003 $9.36 193-861-004 $9.36 193-861-005 $9.36 193-861-006 $9.36 193-861-007 $9.36 193-861-008 $9.36 193-861-009 $9.36 193-861-010 $9.36 193-861-011 $9.36 193-861-012 $9.36 193-861-013 $9.36 193-861-014 $9.36 193-861-015 $9.36 193-861-016 $9.36 193-861-017 $9.36 193-861-018 $9.36 193-861-019 $9.36 193-861-020 $9.36 193-870-001 $9.36 193-870-002 $9.36 193-870-003 $9.36 193-870-004 $9.36 193-870-005 $9.36 193-870-006 $9.36 193-880-001 $9.36 193-880-002 $9.36 193-880-003 $9.36 193-880-004 $9.36 193-880-005 $9.36 193-880-006 $9.36 193-880-008 $9.36 193-880-009 $9.36 51 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-880-010 $9.36 193-880-011 $9.36 193-890-001 $9.36 193-890-002 $9.36 193-890-003 $9.36 193-890-004 $9.36 193-890-005 $9.36 193-890-006 $9.36 193-890-007 $9.36 193-890-008 $9.36 193-890-009 $9.36 193-890-010 $9.36 193-890-011 $9.36 193-890-012 $9.36 193-890-013 $9.36 193-890-014 $9.36 193-890-015 $9.36 193-890-016 $9.36 193-890-018 $9.36 193-890-021 $9.36 193-890-022 $9.36 193-890-023 $9.36 193-890-024 $9.36 193-890-025 $9.36 193-890-026 $9.36 193-890-027 $9.36 193-890-028 $9.36 193-890-029 $9.36 193-890-030 $9.36 193-890-032 $9.36 193-890-034 $9.36 193-900-001 $9.36 193-900-002 $9.36 193-900-003 $9.36 193-900-004 $9.36 193-900-005 $9.36 193-900-006 $9.36 193-900-007 $9.36 193-900-008 $9.36 193-900-009 $9.36 193-900-013 $9.36 193-900-015 $9.36 193-910-001 $9.36 193-910-002 $9.36 193-910-003 $9.36 193-910-004 $9.36 193-910-005 $9.36 193-910-006 $9.36 193-920-001 $9.36 193-920-002 $9.36 193-920-003 $9.36 193-920-004 $9.36 193-920-005 $9.36 193-920-006 $9.36 193-920-007 $9.36 193-920-008 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-920-009 $9.36 193-920-010 $9.36 193-920-011 $9.36 193-920-012 $9.36 193-920-013 $9.36 193-920-014 $9.36 193-920-015 $9.36 193-920-016 $9.36 193-920-017 $9.36 193-920-018 $9.36 193-920-019 $9.36 193-920-020 $9.36 193-920-021 $9.36 193-920-022 $9.36 193-920-023 $9.36 193-920-024 $9.36 193-920-025 $9.36 193-920-026 $9.36 193-920-027 $9.36 193-920-028 $9.36 193-920-029 $9.36 193-920-030 $9.36 193-920-031 $9.36 193-920-032 $9.36 193-920-033 $9.36 193-920-034 $9.36 193-920-035 $9.36 193-920-036 $9.36 193-920-037 $9.36 193-920-038 $9.36 193-920-039 $9.36 193-920-040 $9.36 193-920-041 $9.36 193-920-042 $9.36 193-920-043 $9.36 193-920-044 $9.36 193-920-045 $9.36 193-920-046 $9.36 193-920-047 $9.36 193-930-001 $9.36 193-930-002 $9.36 193-930-003 $9.36 193-930-004 $9.36 193-930-005 $9.36 193-930-006 $9.36 193-930-007 $9.36 193-930-008 $9.36 193-930-009 $9.36 193-930-010 $9.36 193-930-011 $9.36 193-930-012 $9.36 193-930-013 $9.36 193-930-014 $9.36 193-930-015 $9.36 193-940-001 $9.36 193-940-002 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 193-940-003 $9.36 193-940-004 $9.36 193-940-005 $9.36 193-940-006 $9.36 193-940-007 $9.36 193-940-008 $9.36 193-940-009 $9.36 193-940-010 $9.36 193-940-011 $9.36 193-940-012 $9.36 193-940-013 $9.36 193-940-014 $9.36 193-940-015 $9.36 193-940-016 $9.36 193-940-017 $9.36 193-940-018 $9.36 193-940-021 $9.36 193-940-022 $9.36 193-940-023 $9.36 193-940-024 $9.36 193-940-028 $9.36 193-940-029 $9.36 194-070-015 $9.36 194-070-016 $9.36 194-070-018 $9.36 194-070-074 $9.36 194-070-075 $9.36 194-070-078 $9.36 194-070-079 $9.36 194-070-082 $9.36 194-070-083 $9.36 194-070-084 $9.36 194-070-086 $9.36 194-070-087 $9.36 194-100-001 $9.36 194-100-005 $9.36 194-100-006 $9.36 194-100-007 $9.36 194-100-008 $9.36 194-100-009 $9.36 194-101-001 $9.36 194-101-002 $9.36 194-101-003 $9.36 194-101-004 $9.36 194-101-005 $9.36 194-101-006 $9.36 194-110-003 $9.36 194-110-004 $9.36 194-110-005 $9.36 194-110-006 $9.36 194-110-007 $9.36 194-110-008 $9.36 194-110-009 $9.36 194-110-010 $9.36 194-110-011 $9.36 194-110-017 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 194-110-019 $9.36 194-110-020 $9.36 194-110-021 $9.36 194-110-022 $9.36 194-121-002 $9.36 194-121-003 $9.36 194-121-004 $9.36 194-121-005 $9.36 194-121-006 $9.36 194-121-007 $9.36 194-121-009 $9.36 194-121-011 $9.36 194-121-012 $9.36 194-121-014 $9.36 194-122-002 $9.36 194-122-003 $9.36 194-122-004 $9.36 194-122-005 $9.36 194-122-006 $9.36 194-122-007 $9.36 194-122-008 $9.36 194-122-009 $9.36 194-123-001 $9.36 194-123-002 $9.36 194-123-003 $9.36 194-123-004 $9.36 194-123-005 $9.36 194-123-008 $9.36 194-123-009 $9.36 194-123-010 $9.36 194-123-011 $9.36 194-123-012 $9.36 194-123-013 $9.36 194-123-014 $9.36 194-123-015 $9.36 194-123-016 $9.36 194-131-001 $9.36 194-131-002 $9.36 194-131-003 $9.36 194-131-004 $9.36 194-131-005 $9.36 194-131-009 $9.36 194-131-010 $9.36 194-131-012 $9.36 194-131-014 $9.36 194-132-001 $9.36 194-132-002 $9.36 194-133-001 $9.36 194-133-002 $9.36 194-133-003 $9.36 194-133-004 $9.36 194-133-005 $9.36 194-133-006 $9.36 194-133-007 $9.36 194-133-008 $9.36 194-133-009 $9.36 52 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 194-133-010 $9.36 194-133-011 $9.36 194-133-012 $9.36 194-133-013 $9.36 194-133-014 $9.36 194-133-015 $9.36 194-133-016 $9.36 194-133-017 $9.36 194-133-018 $9.36 194-140-001 $9.36 194-140-002 $9.36 194-140-003 $9.36 194-140-004 $9.36 194-140-005 $9.36 194-140-006 $9.36 194-140-007 $9.36 194-140-008 $9.36 194-140-009 $9.36 194-140-010 $9.36 194-140-011 $9.36 194-140-012 $9.36 194-140-013 $9.36 194-140-014 $9.36 194-151-001 $9.36 194-151-002 $9.36 194-151-003 $9.36 194-151-004 $9.36 194-151-005 $9.36 194-151-006 $9.36 194-151-007 $9.36 194-151-008 $9.36 194-151-009 $9.36 194-151-010 $9.36 194-151-011 $9.36 194-151-012 $9.36 194-151-013 $9.36 194-152-001 $9.36 194-152-002 $9.36 194-152-003 $9.36 194-152-004 $9.36 194-152-005 $9.36 194-152-006 $9.36 194-152-008 $9.36 194-160-001 $9.36 194-160-002 $9.36 194-160-003 $9.36 194-160-004 $9.36 194-160-005 $9.36 194-160-006 $9.36 194-160-007 $9.36 194-160-008 $9.36 194-160-009 $9.36 194-160-010 $9.36 194-160-011 $9.36 194-160-012 $9.36 194-160-013 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 194-160-014 $9.36 194-160-015 $9.36 194-160-016 $9.36 194-160-017 $9.36 194-160-018 $9.36 194-160-019 $9.36 194-160-020 $9.36 194-160-021 $9.36 194-160-022 $9.36 194-170-001 $9.36 194-170-002 $9.36 194-170-003 $9.36 194-170-004 $9.36 194-170-005 $9.36 194-170-006 $9.36 194-170-007 $9.36 194-170-008 $9.36 194-170-009 $9.36 194-170-010 $9.36 194-170-015 $9.36 194-170-016 $9.36 194-170-017 $9.36 194-170-018 $9.36 194-170-019 $9.36 194-170-020 $9.36 194-170-022 $9.36 194-170-023 $9.36 194-170-025 $9.36 194-170-026 $9.36 194-190-001 $9.36 194-190-002 $9.36 194-190-003 $9.36 194-190-005 $9.36 194-190-006 $9.36 194-190-007 $9.36 194-190-008 $9.36 194-190-009 $9.36 194-190-010 $9.36 194-190-011 $9.36 194-190-012 $9.36 194-190-013 $9.36 194-190-014 $9.36 194-190-015 $9.36 194-190-016 $9.36 194-190-017 $9.36 194-190-019 $9.36 194-201-001 $9.36 194-201-002 $9.36 194-201-003 $9.36 194-202-001 $9.36 194-202-002 $9.36 194-202-003 $9.36 194-202-004 $9.36 194-202-005 $9.36 194-202-006 $9.36 194-202-007 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 194-202-008 $9.36 194-202-009 $9.36 194-211-001 $9.36 194-211-002 $9.36 194-211-003 $9.36 194-211-004 $9.36 194-211-005 $9.36 194-211-006 $9.36 194-211-007 $9.36 194-211-008 $9.36 194-211-009 $9.36 194-211-010 $9.36 194-211-011 $9.36 194-211-012 $9.36 194-212-001 $9.36 194-212-002 $9.36 194-212-003 $9.36 194-212-004 $9.36 194-212-005 $9.36 194-212-006 $9.36 194-212-007 $9.36 194-212-008 $9.36 194-213-001 $9.36 194-213-004 $9.36 194-213-005 $9.36 194-213-007 $9.36 194-213-008 $9.36 194-221-001 $9.36 194-221-002 $9.36 194-221-003 $9.36 194-221-004 $9.36 194-221-005 $9.36 194-221-006 $9.36 194-221-007 $9.36 194-221-010 $9.36 194-221-011 $9.36 194-221-015 $9.36 194-221-016 $9.36 194-222-003 $9.36 194-222-004 $9.36 194-222-005 $9.36 194-222-006 $9.36 194-222-007 $9.36 194-222-008 $9.36 194-222-009 $9.36 194-222-010 $9.36 194-222-011 $9.36 194-222-012 $9.36 194-222-013 $9.36 194-222-014 $9.36 194-222-015 $9.36 194-222-016 $9.36 194-222-018 $9.36 194-222-019 $9.36 194-231-001 $9.36 194-231-002 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 194-231-004 $9.36 194-231-006 $9.36 194-231-007 $9.36 194-231-008 $9.36 194-231-010 $9.36 194-231-011 $9.36 194-232-001 $9.36 194-232-002 $9.36 194-232-003 $9.36 194-232-004 $9.36 194-232-005 $9.36 194-232-006 $9.36 194-232-007 $9.36 194-232-008 $9.36 194-232-009 $9.36 194-232-010 $9.36 194-232-011 $9.36 194-232-012 $9.36 194-232-013 $9.36 194-232-014 $9.36 194-232-015 $9.36 194-232-016 $9.36 195-400-001 $9.36 195-400-002 $9.36 195-400-003 $9.36 195-400-004 $9.36 195-400-005 $9.36 195-400-006 $9.36 195-400-007 $9.36 195-400-008 $9.36 195-400-009 $9.36 195-400-010 $9.36 195-410-001 $9.36 195-410-002 $9.36 195-410-003 $9.36 195-410-004 $9.36 195-410-005 $9.36 195-410-006 $9.36 195-410-010 $9.36 195-410-011 $9.36 195-410-012 $9.36 195-410-013 $9.36 195-410-015 $9.36 195-410-016 $9.36 195-410-018 $9.36 195-410-019 $9.36 196-010-008 $9.36 196-010-009 $9.36 196-010-010 $9.36 196-010-011 $9.36 196-010-012 $9.36 196-010-014 $9.36 196-010-015 $9.36 196-010-016 $9.36 196-010-017 $9.36 196-010-018 $9.36 53 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 196-010-019 $9.36 196-010-020 $9.36 196-010-022 $9.36 196-010-025 $9.36 196-010-028 $9.36 196-010-031 $9.36 196-010-032 $9.36 196-010-033 $9.36 196-010-034 $9.36 196-010-035 $9.36 196-010-036 $9.36 196-010-037 $9.36 196-010-038 $9.36 196-010-039 $9.36 196-010-040 $9.36 196-010-041 $9.36 196-010-042 $9.36 196-010-043 $9.36 196-010-044 $9.36 196-020-004 $9.36 196-020-005 $9.36 196-020-006 $9.36 196-020-007 $9.36 196-031-003 $9.36 196-031-006 $9.36 196-031-007 $9.36 196-031-009 $9.36 196-031-010 $9.36 196-031-011 $4.68 196-032-006 $9.36 196-032-009 $9.36 196-032-012 $9.36 196-032-013 $9.36 196-032-014 $9.36 196-032-015 $9.36 196-032-016 $9.36 196-032-017 $9.36 196-032-018 $9.36 196-041-007 $9.36 196-041-008 $9.36 196-041-009 $9.36 196-041-010 $9.36 196-041-011 $9.36 196-041-012 $9.36 196-042-002 $9.36 196-042-003 $9.36 196-042-005 $9.36 196-042-006 $9.36 196-042-007 $9.36 196-042-008 $9.36 196-042-009 $9.36 196-050-009 $9.36 196-050-010 $9.36 196-050-012 $9.36 196-050-014 $9.36 196-050-015 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 196-050-017 $9.36 196-050-018 $9.36 196-050-019 $9.36 196-050-020 $9.36 196-061-003 $9.36 196-061-004 $9.36 196-061-005 $9.36 196-061-006 $9.36 196-061-012 $9.36 196-061-013 $9.36 196-061-014 $9.36 196-061-015 $9.36 196-062-001 $9.36 196-062-002 $9.36 196-062-005 $9.36 196-062-006 $9.36 196-062-007 $9.36 196-070-004 $9.36 196-070-007 $9.36 196-070-008 $9.36 196-070-009 $9.36 196-070-010 $9.36 196-070-011 $9.36 196-070-012 $9.36 196-070-015 $9.36 196-070-016 $9.36 196-070-017 $9.36 196-070-018 $9.36 196-070-019 $9.36 196-080-002 $9.36 196-080-022 $9.36 196-080-023 $9.36 196-080-024 $9.36 196-080-025 $9.36 196-080-032 $9.36 196-080-036 $9.36 196-080-038 $9.36 196-080-040 $9.36 196-080-042 $9.36 196-080-043 $9.36 196-091-006 $9.36 196-091-007 $9.36 196-091-013 $9.36 196-091-014 $9.36 196-092-003 $9.36 196-092-004 $9.36 196-092-005 $9.36 196-092-006 $9.36 196-092-007 $9.36 196-092-008 $9.36 196-100-001 $9.36 196-100-002 $9.36 196-100-003 $9.36 196-100-004 $9.36 196-100-005 $9.36 196-100-006 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 196-100-007 $9.36 196-100-008 $9.36 196-100-011 $9.36 196-100-012 $9.36 196-100-017 $9.36 196-100-019 $9.36 196-100-020 $9.36 196-110-007 $9.36 196-110-027 $9.36 196-110-028 $9.36 196-110-029 $9.36 196-110-030 $9.36 196-110-039 $9.36 196-110-041 $9.36 196-110-042 $9.36 196-110-043 $9.36 196-110-044 $9.36 196-110-046 $9.36 196-110-048 $9.36 196-110-049 $9.36 196-110-052 $9.36 196-110-053 $9.36 196-120-005 $9.36 196-120-008 $9.36 196-120-009 $9.36 196-120-010 $9.36 196-120-013 $9.36 196-120-014 $9.36 196-120-015 $9.36 196-120-016 $9.36 196-120-017 $9.36 196-120-018 $9.36 196-120-019 $9.36 196-120-020 $9.36 196-130-005 $9.36 196-130-006 $9.36 196-130-007 $9.36 196-130-008 $9.36 196-130-014 $9.36 196-130-017 $9.36 196-130-020 $9.36 196-130-022 $9.36 196-130-023 $9.36 196-130-026 $9.36 196-130-027 $9.36 196-130-030 $9.36 196-130-032 $9.36 196-130-039 $9.36 196-130-040 $9.36 196-130-041 $9.36 196-130-042 $9.36 196-130-043 $9.36 196-510-002 $9.36 196-510-003 $9.36 196-510-004 $9.36 196-510-005 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 196-510-006 $9.36 196-510-007 $9.36 196-510-010 $9.36 196-510-013 $9.36 196-510-014 $9.36 197-010-007 $9.36 197-010-008 $9.36 197-010-013 $18.72 197-010-014 $18.72 197-010-016 $18.72 197-010-019 $9.36 197-010-025 $102.96 197-010-026 $9.36 197-010-027 $9.36 197-010-028 $9.36 197-010-029 $4.68 197-020-017 $9.36 197-020-023 $9.36 197-020-024 $9.36 197-020-025 $9.36 197-030-001 $9.36 197-030-025 $9.36 197-040-004 $9.36 197-040-007 $9.36 197-040-011 $9.36 197-040-012 $9.36 197-040-015 $9.36 197-040-017 $9.36 197-040-018 $9.36 197-040-020 $9.36 197-040-021 $9.36 197-040-022 $9.36 197-040-023 $9.36 197-040-024 $9.36 197-040-025 $9.36 197-040-026 $9.36 197-040-027 $9.36 197-040-028 $9.36 197-040-029 $9.36 197-040-030 $9.36 197-040-031 $9.36 197-040-032 $9.36 197-040-033 $9.36 197-040-034 $9.36 197-040-035 $9.36 197-040-036 $9.36 197-040-037 $9.36 197-050-007 $9.36 197-050-013 $9.36 197-050-014 $9.36 197-050-015 $9.36 197-050-016 $9.36 197-050-021 $9.36 197-050-022 $9.36 197-050-023 $9.36 197-050-025 $9.36 54 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-050-026 $4.68 197-050-027 $9.36 197-050-029 $9.36 197-060-002 $9.36 197-060-003 $9.36 197-060-004 $9.36 197-060-005 $9.36 197-060-006 $9.36 197-060-007 $9.36 197-060-008 $9.36 197-060-009 $9.36 197-060-010 $9.36 197-060-011 $9.36 197-060-012 $9.36 197-060-013 $9.36 197-060-014 $9.36 197-060-015 $9.36 197-060-016 $9.36 197-060-017 $9.36 197-060-018 $9.36 197-060-019 $9.36 197-060-020 $9.36 197-060-021 $9.36 197-060-022 $9.36 197-060-023 $9.36 197-060-024 $9.36 197-060-025 $9.36 197-060-026 $9.36 197-060-027 $9.36 197-060-029 $9.36 197-060-030 $9.36 197-060-031 $9.36 197-060-032 $9.36 197-060-033 $9.36 197-070-001 $9.36 197-070-002 $9.36 197-070-005 $9.36 197-070-012 $9.36 197-070-013 $9.36 197-070-014 $9.36 197-070-017 $9.36 197-070-018 $9.36 197-070-019 $9.36 197-070-020 $9.36 197-070-021 $9.36 197-070-022 $9.36 197-070-023 $9.36 197-070-024 $9.36 197-090-006 $9.36 197-090-007 $9.36 197-090-008 $9.36 197-090-012 $9.36 197-090-013 $9.36 197-090-014 $9.36 197-090-020 $9.36 197-090-021 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-170-018 $9.36 197-190-013 $9.36 197-190-014 $9.36 197-190-015 $9.36 197-190-016 $9.36 197-190-022 $9.36 197-190-034 $9.36 197-190-036 $9.36 197-190-037 $9.36 197-190-039 $9.36 197-190-041 $9.36 197-190-042 $9.36 197-200-006 $9.36 197-200-007 $9.36 197-200-008 $9.36 197-200-009 $9.36 197-200-010 $9.36 197-200-011 $9.36 197-200-012 $9.36 197-200-013 $9.36 197-200-014 $9.36 197-200-015 $9.36 197-200-016 $9.36 197-200-017 $9.36 197-200-018 $9.36 197-200-019 $9.36 197-200-022 $9.36 197-200-023 $9.36 197-200-025 $9.36 197-200-026 $9.36 197-200-027 $9.36 197-201-001 $9.36 197-201-002 $9.36 197-201-003 $9.36 197-220-002 $9.36 197-220-003 $9.36 197-220-004 $9.36 197-220-005 $9.36 197-220-011 $9.36 197-220-015 $9.36 197-220-017 $9.36 197-220-018 $9.36 197-230-001 $9.36 197-230-002 $9.36 197-230-003 $9.36 197-230-004 $9.36 197-230-005 $9.36 197-230-006 $9.36 197-230-007 $9.36 197-230-008 $9.36 197-230-009 $9.36 197-230-010 $9.36 197-230-011 $9.36 197-230-012 $9.36 197-230-013 $9.36 197-230-014 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-230-015 $9.36 197-230-016 $9.36 197-230-017 $9.36 197-230-018 $9.36 197-270-001 $9.36 197-270-011 $9.36 197-270-012 $9.36 197-270-018 $9.36 197-270-019 $9.36 197-270-021 $9.36 197-270-022 $9.36 197-270-023 $9.36 197-270-024 $9.36 197-281-001 $9.36 197-281-002 $9.36 197-281-007 $9.36 197-281-008 $9.36 197-281-009 $9.36 197-281-010 $9.36 197-281-011 $9.36 197-281-012 $9.36 197-281-013 $9.36 197-282-001 $9.36 197-282-002 $9.36 197-282-003 $9.36 197-282-004 $9.36 197-282-006 $9.36 197-282-007 $9.36 197-283-001 $9.36 197-290-003 $9.36 197-290-007 $9.36 197-290-012 $9.36 197-290-015 $9.36 197-290-017 $9.36 197-290-018 $9.36 197-290-028 $9.36 197-290-030 $9.36 197-290-031 $9.36 197-290-034 $9.36 197-290-035 $9.36 197-290-038 $9.36 197-290-043 $9.36 197-290-044 $9.36 197-290-047 $9.36 197-290-048 $9.36 197-290-052 $9.36 197-290-055 $9.36 197-290-056 $9.36 197-290-057 $9.36 197-301-001 $9.36 197-301-002 $9.36 197-301-003 $9.36 197-301-004 $9.36 197-301-005 $9.36 197-301-011 $9.36 197-301-012 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-301-013 $9.36 197-302-002 $9.36 197-302-003 $9.36 197-302-004 $9.36 197-302-005 $9.36 197-302-006 $9.36 197-302-007 $9.36 197-302-008 $9.36 197-302-009 $9.36 197-302-010 $9.36 197-302-011 $9.36 197-302-012 $9.36 197-302-014 $9.36 197-302-015 $9.36 197-303-001 $9.36 197-303-002 $9.36 197-303-003 $9.36 197-303-004 $9.36 197-303-005 $9.36 197-303-006 $9.36 197-303-007 $9.36 197-310-001 $4.68 197-310-002 $4.68 197-310-003 $4.68 197-310-004 $4.68 197-310-005 $4.68 197-310-006 $4.68 197-310-007 $4.68 197-310-008 $4.68 197-310-009 $4.68 197-310-010 $4.68 197-310-011 $4.68 197-310-012 $4.68 197-310-013 $4.68 197-310-014 $4.68 197-310-015 $4.68 197-310-016 $4.68 197-310-017 $4.68 197-310-018 $4.68 197-310-019 $4.68 197-310-020 $4.68 197-310-021 $4.68 197-310-022 $4.68 197-310-023 $4.68 197-310-024 $4.68 197-310-025 $4.68 197-310-026 $4.68 197-310-027 $4.68 197-310-028 $4.68 197-310-029 $4.68 197-310-030 $4.68 197-310-031 $4.68 197-310-032 $4.68 197-310-033 $4.68 197-310-034 $4.68 197-310-035 $4.68 55 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-310-036 $4.68 197-310-037 $4.68 197-310-038 $4.68 197-310-039 $4.68 197-310-040 $4.68 197-310-041 $4.68 197-310-042 $4.68 197-310-043 $4.68 197-310-044 $4.68 197-310-045 $4.68 197-310-046 $4.68 197-310-047 $4.68 197-310-048 $4.68 197-310-049 $4.68 197-310-050 $4.68 197-310-051 $4.68 197-310-052 $4.68 197-310-053 $4.68 197-310-054 $4.68 197-310-055 $4.68 197-320-001 $4.68 197-320-002 $4.68 197-320-003 $4.68 197-320-004 $4.68 197-320-005 $4.68 197-320-006 $4.68 197-320-007 $4.68 197-320-008 $4.68 197-320-009 $4.68 197-320-010 $4.68 197-320-011 $4.68 197-320-012 $4.68 197-320-013 $4.68 197-320-014 $4.68 197-320-015 $4.68 197-320-016 $4.68 197-320-017 $4.68 197-320-018 $4.68 197-320-019 $4.68 197-320-020 $4.68 197-320-021 $4.68 197-320-022 $4.68 197-320-023 $4.68 197-320-024 $4.68 197-320-025 $4.68 197-320-026 $4.68 197-320-027 $4.68 197-320-028 $4.68 197-320-029 $4.68 197-320-030 $4.68 197-320-031 $4.68 197-320-032 $4.68 197-330-001 $4.68 197-330-002 $4.68 197-330-003 $4.68 197-330-004 $4.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-330-005 $4.68 197-330-006 $4.68 197-330-007 $4.68 197-330-008 $4.68 197-330-009 $4.68 197-340-001 $9.36 197-340-002 $9.36 197-340-003 $9.36 197-340-004 $9.36 197-340-005 $9.36 197-340-006 $9.36 197-340-007 $9.36 197-340-008 $9.36 197-350-002 $9.36 197-350-003 $9.36 197-350-004 $9.36 197-350-008 $9.36 197-350-010 $9.36 197-350-011 $9.36 197-350-012 $9.36 197-350-013 $9.36 197-350-014 $9.36 197-350-015 $9.36 197-350-018 $9.36 197-350-019 $9.36 197-350-020 $9.36 197-350-021 $9.36 197-350-022 $9.36 197-350-027 $9.36 197-350-028 $9.36 197-350-030 $9.36 197-350-031 $9.36 197-350-032 $9.36 197-360-004 $9.36 197-360-010 $9.36 197-360-011 $9.36 197-360-013 $9.36 197-360-015 $9.36 197-360-019 $9.36 197-360-020 $9.36 197-360-025 $9.36 197-360-026 $9.36 197-360-028 $9.36 197-360-029 $9.36 197-360-030 $9.36 197-360-031 $9.36 197-371-005 $9.36 197-371-006 $9.36 197-371-007 $9.36 197-371-009 $9.36 197-371-011 $9.36 197-371-012 $9.36 197-371-014 $9.36 197-380-019 $9.36 197-380-029 $9.36 197-380-037 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-380-039 $9.36 197-380-040 $9.36 197-380-041 $9.36 197-380-042 $9.36 197-380-043 $9.36 197-380-046 $9.36 197-380-049 $9.36 197-380-052 $9.36 197-380-053 $9.36 197-380-054 $9.36 197-390-001 $9.36 197-390-002 $9.36 197-390-003 $9.36 197-390-004 $9.36 197-390-005 $9.36 197-390-006 $9.36 197-390-007 $9.36 197-390-008 $9.36 197-390-011 $9.36 197-390-012 $9.36 197-390-013 $9.36 197-390-014 $9.36 197-390-015 $9.36 197-390-016 $9.36 197-390-017 $9.36 197-390-018 $9.36 197-390-020 $9.36 197-400-001 $9.36 197-400-002 $9.36 197-400-003 $9.36 197-400-004 $9.36 197-400-007 $9.36 197-400-008 $9.36 197-400-009 $4.68 197-400-010 $9.36 197-400-011 $9.36 197-400-012 $9.36 197-400-013 $9.36 197-400-014 $9.36 197-410-001 $4.68 197-410-002 $4.68 197-410-003 $4.68 197-410-004 $4.68 197-410-005 $4.68 197-410-006 $4.68 197-410-007 $4.68 197-410-008 $4.68 197-410-009 $4.68 197-410-010 $4.68 197-410-011 $4.68 197-410-012 $4.68 197-420-006 $4.68 197-420-007 $4.68 197-420-008 $4.68 197-420-009 $4.68 197-420-010 $4.68 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-420-011 $4.68 197-420-012 $4.68 197-420-013 $4.68 197-420-014 $4.68 197-420-015 $4.68 197-420-016 $4.68 197-420-017 $4.68 197-420-018 $4.68 197-420-019 $4.68 197-420-020 $4.68 197-420-021 $4.68 197-420-022 $4.68 197-420-023 $4.68 197-420-024 $4.68 197-420-025 $4.68 197-420-026 $4.68 197-420-027 $4.68 197-420-028 $4.68 197-420-029 $4.68 197-420-030 $4.68 197-420-031 $4.68 197-420-032 $4.68 197-420-033 $4.68 197-420-034 $4.68 197-420-035 $4.68 197-430-001 $4.68 197-430-002 $4.68 197-430-003 $4.68 197-430-004 $4.68 197-430-005 $4.68 197-430-006 $4.68 197-430-007 $4.68 197-430-008 $4.68 197-430-009 $4.68 197-430-010 $4.68 197-440-005 $9.36 197-440-006 $9.36 197-440-007 $9.36 197-440-008 $9.36 197-440-009 $9.36 197-440-010 $9.36 197-440-011 $9.36 197-440-012 $9.36 197-440-013 $9.36 197-440-014 $9.36 197-440-015 $9.36 197-440-016 $9.36 197-440-017 $9.36 197-440-018 $9.36 197-440-019 $9.36 197-450-001 $4.68 197-450-002 $4.68 197-450-003 $9.36 197-450-004 $9.36 197-450-005 $9.36 197-450-006 $9.36 56 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-450-007 $9.36 197-450-008 $9.36 197-450-009 $9.36 197-450-010 $9.36 197-450-011 $9.36 197-450-012 $9.36 197-450-013 $9.36 197-450-014 $9.36 197-450-015 $9.36 197-450-016 $9.36 197-460-008 $9.36 197-460-009 $9.36 197-460-010 $9.36 197-460-011 $9.36 197-460-012 $9.36 197-460-013 $9.36 197-460-014 $9.36 197-460-015 $9.36 197-460-016 $9.36 197-460-017 $9.36 197-470-001 $9.36 197-470-002 $9.36 197-470-003 $9.36 197-470-004 $9.36 197-470-005 $9.36 197-470-006 $9.36 197-470-007 $9.36 197-470-008 $9.36 197-470-009 $9.36 197-470-010 $9.36 197-470-011 $9.36 197-470-012 $9.36 197-470-013 $9.36 197-470-014 $9.36 197-470-015 $9.36 197-470-016 $9.36 197-470-017 $9.36 197-470-018 $9.36 197-470-019 $9.36 197-470-021 $9.36 197-470-031 $9.36 197-470-033 $9.36 197-480-001 $9.36 197-480-002 $9.36 197-480-003 $9.36 197-480-004 $9.36 197-480-005 $9.36 198-010-013 $9.36 198-010-016 $9.36 198-010-019 $17.32 198-010-020 $21.72 198-020-003 $9.36 198-020-008 $9.36 198-020-009 $9.36 198-020-010 $9.36 198-020-011 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-020-012 $9.36 198-020-018 $9.36 198-020-019 $9.36 198-020-020 $9.36 198-020-021 $9.36 198-020-024 $9.36 198-020-030 $9.36 198-020-032 $9.36 198-020-033 $9.36 198-020-034 $9.36 198-020-035 $9.36 198-020-039 $9.36 198-020-040 $9.36 198-020-041 $9.36 198-020-042 $9.36 198-020-043 $9.36 198-020-044 $9.36 198-020-045 $9.36 198-020-046 $9.36 198-020-047 $9.36 198-020-048 $9.36 198-020-052 $9.36 198-020-053 $9.36 198-020-054 $9.36 198-020-055 $9.36 198-020-059 $9.36 198-020-060 $9.36 198-030-004 $9.36 198-030-006 $9.36 198-030-007 $9.36 198-030-008 $9.36 198-030-009 $9.36 198-030-010 $9.36 198-030-011 $9.36 198-030-012 $9.36 198-030-013 $9.36 198-030-014 $9.36 198-030-015 $9.36 198-030-018 $9.36 198-030-019 $9.36 198-030-020 $9.36 198-030-021 $9.36 198-030-022 $9.36 198-030-023 $9.36 198-030-030 $9.36 198-030-032 $9.36 198-030-033 $9.36 198-030-034 $9.36 198-030-035 $9.36 198-030-038 $9.36 198-030-039 $9.36 198-040-002 $9.36 198-040-003 $9.36 198-040-004 $9.36 198-040-005 $9.36 198-040-007 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-040-008 $9.36 198-040-009 $9.36 198-040-017 $9.36 198-040-018 $9.36 198-040-019 $9.36 198-040-020 $9.36 198-040-023 $9.36 198-040-024 $9.36 198-040-026 $9.36 198-040-027 $9.36 198-040-028 $9.36 198-040-029 $9.36 198-040-030 $9.36 198-040-031 $9.36 198-040-032 $9.36 198-040-033 $9.36 198-040-034 $9.36 198-040-035 $9.36 198-040-036 $9.36 198-040-037 $9.36 198-050-006 $9.36 198-050-007 $9.36 198-050-010 $9.36 198-050-011 $9.36 198-050-012 $9.36 198-050-013 $9.36 198-050-014 $9.36 198-050-015 $9.36 198-050-016 $9.36 198-050-017 $9.36 198-050-018 $9.36 198-050-019 $9.36 198-050-020 $9.36 198-050-021 $9.36 198-050-022 $9.36 198-050-025 $9.36 198-050-026 $9.36 198-050-027 $9.36 198-050-028 $9.36 198-050-029 $9.36 198-050-030 $9.36 198-050-031 $9.36 198-050-032 $9.36 198-050-033 $9.36 198-050-034 $9.36 198-050-035 $9.36 198-050-036 $9.36 198-050-037 $9.36 198-050-038 $9.36 198-050-039 $9.36 198-050-040 $9.36 198-050-041 $9.36 198-050-042 $9.36 198-050-043 $9.36 198-050-044 $9.36 198-050-045 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-050-046 $9.36 198-050-047 $9.36 198-050-048 $9.36 198-050-049 $9.36 198-050-050 $9.36 198-061-004 $28.08 198-061-008 $9.36 198-061-009 $9.36 198-061-011 $9.36 198-061-012 $10.38 198-061-016 $9.36 198-062-002 $9.36 198-062-003 $9.36 198-062-004 $9.36 198-062-005 $9.36 198-062-006 $9.36 198-062-007 $9.36 198-062-008 $9.36 198-062-009 $9.36 198-062-010 $9.36 198-062-011 $9.36 198-062-014 $9.36 198-062-019 $9.36 198-062-020 $9.36 198-062-021 $9.36 198-062-022 $9.36 198-062-023 $9.36 198-062-024 $9.36 198-062-026 $9.36 198-062-027 $9.36 198-062-028 $9.36 198-062-029 $9.36 198-062-030 $9.36 198-062-031 $9.36 198-062-032 $9.36 198-062-033 $9.36 198-062-034 $9.36 198-063-001 $9.36 198-063-002 $9.36 198-063-003 $9.36 198-063-004 $9.36 198-063-005 $9.36 198-063-006 $9.36 198-063-007 $9.36 198-063-008 $9.36 198-063-009 $9.36 198-063-010 $9.36 198-063-011 $9.36 198-063-012 $9.36 198-063-013 $9.36 198-063-014 $9.36 198-063-015 $9.36 198-063-016 $9.36 198-071-002 $9.36 198-071-003 $9.36 198-071-004 $9.36 57 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-071-005 $9.36 198-071-006 $9.36 198-072-001 $9.36 198-072-002 $9.36 198-073-001 $9.36 198-073-002 $9.36 198-073-003 $9.36 198-074-001 $9.36 198-074-002 $9.36 198-074-003 $9.36 198-074-004 $9.36 198-081-001 $9.36 198-081-002 $9.36 198-081-003 $9.36 198-081-004 $9.36 198-081-006 $9.36 198-081-007 $9.36 198-081-008 $9.36 198-081-009 $9.36 198-081-010 $9.36 198-081-011 $9.36 198-081-012 $9.36 198-081-013 $9.36 198-081-014 $9.36 198-081-015 $9.36 198-081-016 $9.36 198-081-017 $9.36 198-081-018 $9.36 198-081-019 $9.36 198-081-020 $9.36 198-081-021 $9.36 198-081-022 $9.36 198-082-001 $9.36 198-082-002 $9.36 198-082-003 $9.36 198-082-004 $9.36 198-082-005 $9.36 198-082-006 $9.36 198-082-007 $9.36 198-082-008 $9.36 198-082-009 $9.36 198-082-010 $9.36 198-091-001 $9.36 198-091-003 $9.36 198-091-004 $9.36 198-091-005 $9.36 198-091-006 $9.36 198-091-007 $9.36 198-092-001 $9.36 198-092-002 $9.36 198-092-003 $9.36 198-092-004 $9.36 198-093-001 $9.36 198-093-002 $9.36 198-093-003 $9.36 198-093-004 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-093-005 $9.36 198-093-006 $9.36 198-093-007 $9.36 198-093-008 $9.36 198-093-009 $9.36 198-094-001 $9.36 198-094-002 $9.36 198-094-003 $9.36 198-094-005 $9.36 198-094-006 $9.36 198-100-005 $9.36 198-100-006 $9.36 198-100-011 $9.36 198-100-012 $9.36 198-111-001 $9.36 198-111-002 $9.36 198-111-003 $9.36 198-111-004 $9.36 198-111-005 $9.36 198-111-006 $9.36 198-111-007 $9.36 198-111-008 $9.36 198-111-009 $9.36 198-111-010 $9.36 198-111-011 $9.36 198-111-012 $9.36 198-111-013 $9.36 198-111-014 $9.36 198-111-015 $9.36 198-111-016 $9.36 198-111-017 $9.36 198-111-020 $9.36 198-111-021 $9.36 198-111-022 $9.36 198-111-025 $9.36 198-111-032 $9.36 198-111-033 $9.36 198-111-037 $9.36 198-111-039 $9.36 198-111-040 $9.36 198-111-041 $9.36 198-111-042 $9.36 198-111-043 $9.36 198-112-001 $9.36 198-112-002 $9.36 198-112-003 $9.36 198-112-004 $9.36 198-112-005 $9.36 198-112-006 $9.36 198-112-007 $9.36 198-112-008 $9.36 198-112-009 $9.36 198-112-010 $9.36 198-112-011 $9.36 198-112-012 $9.36 198-120-002 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-120-003 $9.36 198-120-004 $9.36 198-120-005 $9.36 198-120-006 $9.36 198-120-007 $9.36 198-120-008 $9.36 198-120-009 $9.36 198-120-010 $9.36 198-120-011 $9.36 198-120-012 $9.36 198-120-017 $9.36 198-120-018 $9.36 198-120-019 $9.36 198-131-001 $9.36 198-131-002 $9.36 198-131-003 $9.36 198-131-004 $9.36 198-131-005 $9.36 198-131-006 $9.36 198-131-007 $9.36 198-131-008 $9.36 198-131-009 $9.36 198-131-010 $9.36 198-131-011 $9.36 198-131-012 $9.36 198-131-013 $9.36 198-131-014 $9.36 198-131-015 $9.36 198-131-016 $9.36 198-131-017 $9.36 198-131-018 $9.36 198-131-019 $9.36 198-131-020 $9.36 198-131-021 $9.36 198-131-022 $9.36 198-131-023 $9.36 198-131-024 $9.36 198-131-025 $9.36 198-131-026 $9.36 198-131-027 $9.36 198-131-028 $9.36 198-131-029 $9.36 198-131-030 $9.36 198-132-004 $9.36 198-132-006 $9.36 198-132-007 $4.68 198-132-008 $9.36 198-132-012 $9.36 198-132-013 $9.36 198-132-014 $9.36 198-132-021 $9.36 198-132-022 $9.36 198-132-023 $9.36 198-132-024 $9.36 198-140-003 $9.36 198-140-004 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-140-005 $9.36 198-140-006 $9.36 198-140-007 $9.36 198-140-008 $9.36 198-140-009 $9.36 198-140-010 $9.36 198-140-011 $9.36 198-140-012 $9.36 198-140-013 $9.36 198-140-014 $9.36 198-140-015 $9.36 198-140-016 $9.36 198-140-017 $9.36 198-140-018 $9.36 198-140-019 $9.36 198-140-020 $9.36 198-140-021 $9.36 198-140-024 $9.36 198-140-025 $9.36 198-140-026 $9.36 198-140-027 $9.36 198-140-028 $9.36 198-140-029 $9.36 198-140-030 $9.36 198-140-031 $9.36 198-140-032 $9.36 198-140-033 $9.36 198-140-034 $9.36 198-140-035 $9.36 198-140-036 $9.36 198-140-040 $9.36 198-140-044 $9.36 198-140-045 $9.36 198-151-001 $9.36 198-151-002 $9.36 198-151-003 $9.36 198-151-004 $9.36 198-151-005 $9.36 198-151-006 $9.36 198-152-001 $9.36 198-152-002 $9.36 198-152-003 $9.36 198-152-004 $9.36 198-152-005 $9.36 198-152-009 $9.36 198-152-010 $4.68 198-152-011 $9.36 198-152-012 $9.36 198-152-013 $9.36 198-152-015 $9.36 198-152-017 $9.36 198-160-002 $9.36 198-160-003 $9.36 198-160-004 $9.36 198-160-005 $9.36 198-160-006 $9.36 58 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-160-007 $9.36 198-160-008 $9.36 198-160-009 $9.36 198-160-010 $9.36 198-160-011 $9.36 198-160-012 $9.36 198-160-013 $9.36 198-160-014 $9.36 198-160-018 $9.36 198-160-019 $9.36 198-160-020 $9.36 198-160-021 $9.36 198-160-022 $9.36 198-160-023 $9.36 198-160-024 $9.36 198-160-025 $9.36 198-160-026 $9.36 198-160-027 $9.36 198-160-028 $9.36 198-160-029 $9.36 198-160-030 $9.36 198-160-031 $9.36 198-160-032 $9.36 198-160-033 $9.36 198-160-035 $9.36 198-160-036 $9.36 198-160-037 $9.36 198-160-038 $9.36 198-160-039 $9.36 198-170-006 $4.68 198-170-008 $28.08 198-190-010 $9.36 198-190-011 $9.36 198-190-012 $9.36 198-190-013 $9.36 198-190-018 $9.36 198-190-019 $9.36 198-190-021 $9.36 198-190-022 $9.36 198-190-025 $9.36 198-190-026 $9.36 198-190-027 $9.36 198-190-029 $9.36 198-190-032 $9.36 198-190-033 $9.36 198-190-038 $9.36 198-190-040 $9.36 198-190-041 $9.36 198-200-001 $9.36 198-200-003 $9.36 198-200-005 $9.36 198-200-006 $9.36 198-200-007 $9.36 198-200-008 $9.36 198-200-009 $9.36 198-200-015 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-200-018 $9.36 198-200-019 $9.36 198-200-020 $9.36 198-200-021 $9.36 198-200-022 $9.36 198-200-023 $9.36 198-200-024 $9.36 198-220-002 $9.36 198-220-006 $9.36 198-220-008 $9.36 198-220-016 $9.36 198-220-017 $9.36 198-220-018 $9.36 198-220-019 $9.36 198-220-023 $9.36 198-220-024 $9.36 198-220-027 $9.36 198-220-029 $9.36 198-220-030 $9.36 198-220-031 $9.36 198-220-032 $9.36 198-220-033 $9.36 198-220-036 $9.36 198-220-039 $9.36 198-220-040 $9.36 198-220-041 $9.36 198-220-042 $9.36 198-220-045 $9.36 198-220-047 $9.36 198-220-049 $9.36 198-220-050 $9.36 198-220-051 $4.68 198-220-052 $4.68 198-220-053 $9.36 198-220-055 $4.68 198-220-056 $9.36 198-230-002 $9.36 198-230-008 $9.36 198-230-010 $9.36 198-230-011 $9.36 198-230-013 $9.36 198-230-014 $9.36 198-230-015 $9.36 198-230-017 $9.36 198-251-002 $9.36 198-251-003 $9.36 198-251-004 $9.36 198-251-005 $9.36 198-251-008 $9.36 198-251-010 $9.36 198-252-001 $9.36 198-252-002 $9.36 198-252-003 $9.36 198-252-004 $9.36 198-252-005 $9.36 198-252-006 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-252-007 $9.36 198-252-008 $9.36 198-252-009 $9.36 198-252-010 $9.36 198-252-011 $9.36 198-252-012 $9.36 198-252-013 $9.36 198-252-014 $9.36 198-252-016 $9.36 198-252-020 $9.36 198-252-021 $9.36 198-261-001 $9.36 198-261-002 $9.36 198-261-003 $9.36 198-261-004 $9.36 198-261-005 $9.36 198-261-006 $9.36 198-261-007 $9.36 198-261-008 $9.36 198-261-009 $9.36 198-261-010 $9.36 198-261-011 $9.36 198-261-012 $9.36 198-261-014 $9.36 198-262-001 $9.36 198-262-002 $4.68 198-262-003 $4.68 198-262-004 $4.68 198-270-001 $9.36 198-270-002 $9.36 198-270-003 $9.36 198-270-004 $9.36 198-270-005 $9.36 198-270-006 $9.36 198-270-007 $9.36 198-270-008 $9.36 198-270-009 $9.36 198-270-010 $9.36 198-270-011 $9.36 198-270-012 $9.36 198-270-013 $9.36 198-270-014 $9.36 198-270-015 $9.36 198-270-016 $9.36 198-270-017 $9.36 198-280-001 $9.36 198-280-002 $9.36 198-280-003 $9.36 198-280-005 $9.36 198-280-006 $9.36 198-280-007 $9.36 198-280-008 $9.36 198-280-011 $9.36 198-280-012 $9.36 198-280-013 $9.36 198-280-014 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 198-280-015 $9.36 198-280-016 $9.36 198-280-017 $9.36 198-280-018 $9.36 198-290-001 $9.36 198-290-003 $9.36 198-290-004 $9.36 198-290-005 $9.36 198-290-006 $9.36 198-290-007 $9.36 198-290-008 $9.36 198-290-013 $9.36 198-290-027 $9.36 198-290-028 $9.36 198-290-029 $9.36 198-290-032 $9.36 198-290-033 $9.36 198-290-034 $9.36 198-290-040 $9.36 198-290-041 $9.36 198-290-042 $9.36 198-290-043 $9.36 198-290-045 $9.36 198-290-046 $9.36 198-290-047 $9.36 198-290-048 $9.36 198-290-049 $9.36 201-010-001 $9.36 201-010-002 $9.36 201-010-003 $9.36 201-010-004 $9.36 201-010-005 $9.36 201-010-006 $9.36 201-010-007 $9.36 201-010-008 $9.36 201-010-009 $9.36 201-010-010 $9.36 201-010-011 $9.36 201-010-012 $9.36 201-010-013 $9.36 201-010-014 $9.36 201-010-015 $9.36 201-010-016 $9.36 201-010-017 $9.36 201-010-018 $9.36 201-021-003 $9.36 201-022-003 $9.36 201-022-004 $9.36 201-022-005 $9.36 201-022-006 $9.36 201-030-001 $9.36 201-030-002 $9.36 201-030-003 $9.36 201-030-004 $9.36 201-030-005 $9.36 201-030-006 $9.36 59 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 36 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2852 MR LEVY CODE: Alamo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 201-030-008 $9.36 201-030-009 $9.36 201-030-010 $9.36 201-030-011 $9.36 201-030-012 $9.36 201-030-013 $9.36 201-040-001 $9.36 201-040-002 $9.36 201-040-003 $9.36 201-040-004 $9.36 201-040-005 $9.36 201-040-006 $9.36 201-040-007 $9.36 201-040-008 $9.36 201-040-009 $9.36 201-040-010 $9.36 201-040-011 $9.36 201-040-012 $9.36 201-040-013 $9.36 201-040-014 $9.36 201-040-015 $9.36 201-040-016 $9.36 201-040-017 $9.36 201-040-018 $9.36 201-040-019 $9.36 201-040-020 $9.36 201-040-021 $9.36 201-040-022 $9.36 201-050-023 $9.36 201-050-024 $9.36 201-050-025 $9.36 201-050-026 $9.36 201-050-027 $9.36 201-050-028 $9.36 201-050-029 $9.36 201-050-030 $9.36 201-050-031 $9.36 201-050-032 $9.36 201-050-033 $9.36 201-050-034 $9.36 201-050-035 $9.36 201-050-036 $9.36 201-050-037 $9.36 201-050-039 $9.36 201-050-040 $9.36 201-050-043 $9.36 201-050-045 $9.36 201-050-046 $9.36 201-050-047 $9.36 201-050-053 $9.36 201-050-054 $9.36 201-050-055 $9.36 201-050-056 $9.36 201-050-059 $9.36 201-061-002 $9.36 201-061-003 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 201-061-004 $9.36 201-061-005 $9.36 201-061-006 $9.36 201-061-008 $9.36 201-062-001 $9.36 201-062-002 $9.36 201-062-003 $9.36 201-062-006 $9.36 201-062-007 $9.36 201-062-008 $9.36 201-062-009 $9.36 201-062-010 $9.36 201-062-011 $9.36 201-063-001 $9.36 201-063-002 $9.36 201-063-003 $9.36 201-063-004 $9.36 201-063-005 $9.36 201-063-006 $9.36 201-063-007 $9.36 201-063-008 $9.36 201-063-009 $9.36 201-063-010 $9.36 201-063-012 $9.36 201-063-013 $9.36 201-070-003 $9.36 201-070-009 $9.36 201-070-010 $9.36 201-070-016 $4.68 201-070-017 $9.36 201-070-018 $9.36 201-070-019 $9.36 201-070-020 $9.36 201-081-001 $9.36 201-081-002 $9.36 201-081-003 $9.36 201-082-001 $9.36 201-082-002 $9.36 201-082-003 $9.36 201-082-004 $9.36 201-082-005 $9.36 201-082-006 $9.36 201-082-007 $9.36 201-082-008 $9.36 201-082-012 $9.36 201-082-013 $9.36 201-082-014 $9.36 201-082-016 $9.36 201-082-019 $9.36 201-091-001 $9.36 201-091-002 $9.36 201-091-003 $9.36 201-091-004 $9.36 201-091-005 $9.36 201-091-006 $9.36 201-091-007 $9.36 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 201-091-008 $9.36 201-091-009 $9.36 201-091-010 $9.36 201-091-011 $9.36 201-091-012 $9.36 201-091-013 $9.36 201-091-014 $9.36 201-092-001 $9.36 201-092-002 $9.36 201-092-003 $9.36 201-092-004 $9.36 201-092-005 $9.36 201-092-006 $9.36 201-092-007 $9.36 201-092-008 $9.36 201-092-009 $9.36 201-100-014 $9.36 201-100-015 $9.36 201-100-019 $9.36 201-100-020 $9.36 201-100-021 $9.36 5509Total Parcels: $50,521.52 Total Assessment: 60 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 37 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2853 LV LEVY CODE: Clyde Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 100-291-017 $41.76 100-291-018 $41.76 100-291-019 $41.76 100-291-020 $41.76 100-291-021 $41.76 100-291-022 $41.76 100-291-023 $41.76 100-291-024 $41.76 100-291-025 $41.76 100-291-026 $41.76 100-292-017 $41.76 100-292-018 $41.76 100-292-019 $41.76 100-292-020 $41.76 100-292-021 $41.76 100-292-022 $41.76 100-292-023 $41.76 100-292-024 $41.76 100-292-025 $41.76 100-292-026 $41.76 100-292-027 $41.76 100-293-001 $41.76 100-293-002 $41.76 100-293-003 $41.76 100-293-005 $41.76 100-293-006 $41.76 100-293-007 $41.76 100-293-008 $41.76 100-293-009 $41.76 100-293-013 $41.76 100-293-015 $41.76 100-293-016 $41.76 100-293-017 $41.76 100-293-018 $41.76 100-301-019 $41.76 100-301-020 $41.76 100-301-021 $41.76 100-301-022 $41.76 100-301-023 $41.76 100-301-024 $41.76 100-301-025 $41.76 100-301-026 $41.76 100-301-027 $41.76 100-301-028 $41.76 100-301-029 $41.76 100-301-030 $41.76 100-301-031 $41.76 100-301-032 $41.76 100-301-033 $41.76 100-301-034 $41.76 100-301-035 $41.76 100-302-018 $41.76 100-302-019 $41.76 100-302-020 $41.76 100-302-021 $41.76 100-302-022 $41.76 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 100-302-023 $41.76 100-302-024 $41.76 100-302-025 $41.76 100-302-026 $41.76 100-302-027 $41.76 100-302-028 $41.76 100-302-029 $41.76 100-302-030 $41.76 100-302-031 $41.76 100-302-032 $41.76 100-302-033 $41.76 100-302-034 $41.76 100-303-002 $41.76 100-303-003 $41.76 100-303-004 $41.76 100-303-005 $41.76 100-303-006 $41.76 100-303-007 $41.76 100-303-008 $20.88 100-303-009 $41.76 100-303-010 $41.76 100-303-011 $41.76 100-303-012 $41.76 100-303-013 $41.76 100-303-014 $41.76 100-303-015 $41.76 100-303-016 $41.76 100-303-019 $41.76 100-304-002 $41.76 100-304-007 $41.76 100-304-008 $41.76 100-311-025 $41.76 100-311-028 $41.76 100-311-029 $41.76 100-311-030 $41.76 100-311-031 $41.76 100-311-032 $41.76 100-311-033 $41.76 100-311-034 $41.76 100-311-035 $41.76 100-311-036 $41.76 100-311-037 $41.76 100-311-038 $41.76 100-311-039 $41.76 100-311-040 $41.76 100-311-041 $41.76 100-311-042 $41.76 100-311-043 $41.76 100-311-044 $41.76 100-311-045 $41.76 100-311-046 $41.76 100-312-024 $41.76 100-312-025 $41.76 100-312-026 $41.76 100-312-027 $41.76 100-312-028 $41.76 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 100-312-029 $41.76 100-312-030 $41.76 100-312-031 $41.76 100-312-032 $41.76 100-312-033 $41.76 100-312-034 $41.76 100-312-035 $41.76 100-312-036 $41.76 100-312-037 $41.76 100-312-038 $41.76 100-312-039 $41.76 100-313-015 $41.76 100-313-018 $41.76 100-313-020 $41.76 100-313-021 $41.76 100-313-025 $41.76 100-313-028 $41.76 100-313-029 $41.76 100-313-032 $41.76 100-313-034 $41.76 100-313-041 $41.76 100-313-043 $41.76 100-313-045 $41.76 100-313-046 $41.76 100-313-047 $41.76 100-313-048 $41.76 100-313-049 $41.76 100-313-050 $41.76 100-314-004 $41.76 100-314-005 $41.76 100-321-016 $41.76 100-321-025 $41.76 100-321-027 $41.76 100-321-028 $41.76 100-321-029 $41.76 100-321-038 $20.88 100-321-039 $41.76 100-321-040 $334.08 100-321-041 $45.52 100-321-045 $41.76 100-321-047 $41.76 100-321-048 $41.76 100-321-049 $41.76 100-321-050 $41.76 100-321-051 $41.76 100-321-052 $41.76 100-321-054 $41.76 100-321-056 $20.88 100-321-057 $20.88 100-401-011 $41.76 100-401-012 $41.76 100-401-013 $41.76 100-401-014 $41.76 100-401-015 $41.76 100-401-017 $41.76 100-401-024 $41.76 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 100-401-025 $41.76 100-401-026 $41.76 100-401-027 $41.76 100-401-028 $41.76 100-401-029 $41.76 100-401-030 $41.76 100-401-031 $41.76 100-401-032 $41.76 100-401-033 $41.76 100-401-034 $41.76 100-401-035 $41.76 100-401-036 $41.76 100-401-037 $41.76 100-401-038 $41.76 100-401-039 $41.76 100-401-040 $41.76 100-401-041 $41.76 100-401-042 $41.76 100-401-043 $41.76 100-401-044 $41.76 100-401-045 $41.76 100-401-046 $41.76 100-410-004 $41.76 100-410-005 $41.76 100-410-006 $41.76 100-410-007 $41.76 100-410-008 $41.76 100-410-009 $41.76 100-410-010 $41.76 100-410-011 $41.76 100-410-012 $41.76 100-410-013 $41.76 100-410-014 $41.76 100-410-015 $41.76 100-410-016 $41.76 100-410-017 $41.76 100-410-018 $41.76 100-410-019 $41.76 100-410-020 $41.76 100-410-021 $41.76 100-410-022 $41.76 100-410-023 $41.76 100-410-024 $41.76 100-410-025 $41.76 100-410-026 $41.76 100-410-027 $41.76 100-410-028 $41.76 100-410-029 $41.76 100-410-030 $41.76 100-410-031 $41.76 100-411-001 $41.76 100-411-002 $41.76 100-411-003 $41.76 100-411-004 $41.76 100-411-005 $41.76 100-411-006 $41.76 61 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 37 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2853 LV LEVY CODE: Clyde Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 100-411-007 $41.76 100-411-008 $41.76 100-411-009 $41.76 100-411-010 $41.76 100-411-011 $41.76 100-411-012 $41.76 100-411-013 $41.76 100-411-014 $41.76 100-411-015 $41.76 100-411-016 $41.76 100-412-001 $41.76 100-412-002 $41.76 100-412-003 $41.76 100-412-004 $41.76 100-412-005 $41.76 100-412-006 $41.76 100-412-007 $41.76 100-412-008 $41.76 100-412-009 $41.76 100-412-010 $41.76 100-412-011 $41.76 100-412-012 $41.76 100-412-013 $41.76 100-412-014 $41.76 100-412-015 $20.88 100-412-016 $41.76 100-412-017 $41.76 100-412-018 $41.76 100-412-019 $41.76 100-412-020 $41.76 100-412-021 $41.76 100-420-001 $41.76 100-420-002 $41.76 100-420-003 $41.76 100-420-004 $41.76 100-420-005 $41.76 100-420-006 $41.76 100-420-007 $41.76 100-420-008 $41.76 100-420-009 $41.76 100-420-010 $41.76 100-420-011 $41.76 100-420-012 $41.76 100-420-013 $41.76 100-420-014 $41.76 100-420-015 $41.76 100-420-018 $41.76 100-420-019 $41.76 100-420-020 $41.76 100-430-001 $41.76 100-430-002 $41.76 100-430-003 $41.76 100-430-007 $41.76 100-430-008 $41.76 100-430-009 $41.76 100-430-010 $41.76 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 100-430-011 $41.76 100-430-012 $41.76 100-430-014 $41.76 100-430-015 $41.76 100-430-016 $41.76 100-430-017 $41.76 286Total Parcels: $12,135.04 Total Assessment: 62 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-020-009 $96.12 357-020-010 $48.06 357-020-025 $19.54 357-041-001 $32.04 357-041-002 $32.04 357-041-003 $32.04 357-041-005 $32.04 357-041-010 $32.04 357-041-011 $16.02 357-041-013 $32.04 357-042-001 $32.04 357-042-003 $32.04 357-042-004 $16.02 357-042-005 $48.06 357-042-006 $48.06 357-042-007 $32.04 357-042-008 $16.02 357-042-009 $32.04 357-042-010 $32.04 357-042-011 $16.02 357-042-012 $32.04 357-042-013 $32.04 357-042-014 $16.02 357-042-015 $32.04 357-042-016 $16.02 357-042-017 $32.04 357-042-018 $32.04 357-042-022 $32.04 357-042-025 $32.04 357-042-028 $32.04 357-043-001 $96.12 357-043-003 $32.04 357-043-004 $32.04 357-044-001 $32.04 357-044-002 $32.04 357-044-003 $32.04 357-044-006 $32.04 357-044-007 $48.06 357-044-008 $32.04 357-044-009 $32.04 357-044-010 $32.04 357-044-011 $32.04 357-044-012 $32.04 357-044-014 $32.04 357-044-015 $32.04 357-044-016 $48.06 357-045-001 $64.08 357-045-002 $32.04 357-045-003 $32.04 357-045-004 $32.04 357-045-006 $32.04 357-045-007 $32.04 357-046-001 $32.04 357-046-002 $32.04 357-046-003 $32.04 357-046-004 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-046-005 $32.04 357-046-006 $32.04 357-046-007 $32.04 357-046-008 $32.04 357-046-009 $32.04 357-046-012 $32.04 357-046-013 $32.04 357-046-014 $32.04 357-046-015 $32.04 357-046-016 $32.04 357-046-017 $32.04 357-046-021 $32.04 357-046-024 $32.04 357-046-025 $32.04 357-046-026 $32.04 357-047-001 $32.04 357-047-002 $32.04 357-047-003 $32.04 357-047-007 $32.04 357-047-009 $32.04 357-047-010 $48.06 357-047-011 $32.04 357-047-012 $32.04 357-047-015 $64.08 357-047-016 $32.04 357-047-018 $32.04 357-047-019 $32.04 357-047-020 $32.04 357-051-002 $32.04 357-051-003 $32.04 357-051-004 $32.04 357-052-001 $32.04 357-052-002 $16.02 357-052-003 $32.04 357-052-004 $32.04 357-052-007 $32.04 357-052-008 $32.04 357-052-014 $48.06 357-052-015 $16.02 357-052-016 $32.04 357-052-017 $32.04 357-053-001 $32.04 357-053-002 $32.04 357-053-003 $32.04 357-053-004 $32.04 357-053-005 $32.04 357-053-006 $32.04 357-053-007 $32.04 357-053-010 $32.04 357-053-011 $32.04 357-053-014 $48.06 357-053-015 $48.06 357-053-016 $48.06 357-053-017 $96.12 357-053-018 $32.04 357-053-019 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-053-020 $32.04 357-054-004 $32.04 357-054-005 $32.04 357-054-006 $32.04 357-054-007 $32.04 357-054-008 $32.04 357-054-009 $32.04 357-054-010 $32.04 357-054-011 $80.10 357-054-014 $32.04 357-054-015 $32.04 357-054-016 $32.04 357-054-020 $32.04 357-054-021 $32.04 357-061-003 $32.04 357-061-004 $32.04 357-061-005 $16.02 357-061-009 $32.04 357-061-010 $16.02 357-061-011 $48.06 357-061-013 $32.04 357-061-015 $32.04 357-061-016 $32.04 357-061-017 $32.04 357-061-018 $32.04 357-061-019 $32.04 357-061-020 $32.04 357-061-022 $32.04 357-061-025 $32.04 357-061-026 $16.02 357-061-027 $32.04 357-061-028 $32.04 357-062-001 $32.04 357-062-002 $32.04 357-062-003 $32.04 357-062-004 $32.04 357-062-005 $32.04 357-062-006 $32.04 357-062-007 $32.04 357-062-008 $32.04 357-062-009 $32.04 357-062-011 $32.04 357-062-012 $32.04 357-062-016 $32.04 357-062-017 $32.04 357-063-003 $32.04 357-063-004 $32.04 357-063-006 $48.06 357-063-013 $32.04 357-063-014 $32.04 357-063-015 $32.04 357-063-017 $32.04 357-063-018 $16.02 357-071-001 $32.04 357-071-002 $32.04 357-071-003 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-071-004 $32.04 357-071-006 $32.04 357-071-007 $32.04 357-071-008 $32.04 357-071-009 $32.04 357-071-010 $32.04 357-071-011 $32.04 357-071-013 $32.04 357-071-014 $32.04 357-071-015 $32.04 357-071-016 $32.04 357-071-017 $32.04 357-071-018 $32.04 357-071-019 $32.04 357-071-020 $32.04 357-071-021 $32.04 357-071-022 $32.04 357-071-023 $32.04 357-071-024 $32.04 357-071-026 $32.04 357-071-027 $32.04 357-071-028 $32.04 357-071-029 $32.04 357-071-031 $32.04 357-071-032 $32.04 357-071-033 $32.04 357-071-034 $32.04 357-072-001 $32.04 357-072-004 $32.04 357-072-005 $32.04 357-072-006 $32.04 357-072-007 $32.04 357-072-008 $32.04 357-072-010 $32.04 357-072-012 $32.04 357-072-013 $32.04 357-072-014 $32.04 357-072-015 $32.04 357-072-017 $32.04 357-072-018 $32.04 357-072-019 $32.04 357-072-020 $32.04 357-072-021 $32.04 357-072-022 $32.04 357-072-026 $32.04 357-072-028 $32.04 357-072-029 $32.04 357-072-030 $32.04 357-073-001 $32.04 357-073-002 $32.04 357-073-003 $32.04 357-081-001 $480.60 357-081-002 $80.10 357-081-003 $16.02 357-081-004 $32.04 357-081-006 $32.04 63 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-081-007 $32.04 357-081-011 $32.04 357-081-012 $32.04 357-081-013 $32.04 357-081-014 $64.08 357-081-015 $16.02 357-081-017 $32.04 357-081-021 $32.04 357-081-029 $32.04 357-081-032 $32.04 357-081-033 $32.04 357-081-034 $32.04 357-081-035 $32.04 357-081-036 $32.04 357-081-037 $32.04 357-081-038 $32.04 357-082-002 $32.04 357-082-003 $32.04 357-082-004 $32.04 357-082-005 $32.04 357-082-006 $32.04 357-082-007 $32.04 357-082-008 $32.04 357-082-009 $32.04 357-082-010 $32.04 357-082-011 $32.04 357-082-012 $32.04 357-082-013 $48.06 357-082-014 $32.04 357-082-015 $32.04 357-082-016 $192.24 357-082-019 $32.04 357-082-022 $96.12 357-082-023 $32.04 357-082-025 $32.04 357-082-027 $32.04 357-082-028 $32.04 357-082-029 $32.04 357-082-030 $32.04 357-083-001 $32.04 357-083-003 $32.04 357-083-004 $32.04 357-083-005 $32.04 357-083-006 $32.04 357-083-007 $32.04 357-083-009 $32.04 357-083-012 $32.04 357-083-013 $32.04 357-083-014 $32.04 357-083-015 $32.04 357-083-016 $32.04 357-083-017 $32.04 357-083-018 $32.04 357-083-019 $32.04 357-083-020 $32.04 357-083-021 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-083-023 $32.04 357-083-024 $32.04 357-083-025 $32.04 357-083-026 $32.04 357-083-027 $32.04 357-083-028 $32.04 357-083-029 $32.04 357-083-030 $32.04 357-083-031 $32.04 357-083-032 $32.04 357-083-033 $32.04 357-091-005 $64.08 357-091-006 $32.04 357-091-007 $32.04 357-091-011 $32.04 357-091-012 $32.04 357-091-014 $32.04 357-091-015 $32.04 357-091-018 $32.04 357-091-019 $32.04 357-091-020 $32.04 357-091-021 $32.04 357-091-023 $32.04 357-091-030 $32.04 357-091-031 $32.04 357-091-032 $96.12 357-091-033 $32.04 357-091-034 $32.04 357-091-035 $32.04 357-091-036 $32.04 357-091-037 $32.04 357-091-039 $32.04 357-091-040 $32.04 357-091-041 $32.04 357-093-002 $32.04 357-093-003 $32.04 357-093-004 $32.04 357-093-006 $32.04 357-093-007 $32.04 357-093-008 $32.04 357-093-009 $32.04 357-093-010 $32.04 357-093-011 $32.04 357-093-012 $32.04 357-093-013 $32.04 357-093-014 $32.04 357-093-015 $32.04 357-093-016 $32.04 357-093-017 $32.04 357-093-018 $32.04 357-093-022 $32.04 357-093-023 $32.04 357-093-024 $32.04 357-093-025 $32.04 357-093-026 $32.04 357-093-027 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-093-028 $16.02 357-094-001 $32.04 357-094-002 $32.04 357-101-001 $128.16 357-101-002 $16.02 357-101-003 $32.04 357-101-004 $32.04 357-101-005 $32.04 357-101-006 $32.04 357-101-007 $352.44 357-102-001 $32.04 357-102-003 $32.04 357-102-004 $32.04 357-102-005 $32.04 357-102-006 $32.04 357-102-007 $32.04 357-102-008 $32.04 357-102-010 $32.04 357-102-011 $32.04 357-102-012 $16.02 357-102-013 $32.04 357-102-014 $32.04 357-103-001 $32.04 357-103-004 $64.08 357-103-006 $32.04 357-103-007 $32.04 357-103-008 $32.04 357-103-010 $32.04 357-103-013 $32.04 357-103-014 $32.04 357-103-015 $32.04 357-111-001 $32.04 357-111-002 $32.04 357-111-003 $32.04 357-111-009 $32.04 357-111-010 $16.02 357-111-012 $32.04 357-111-013 $32.04 357-111-014 $16.02 357-111-015 $32.04 357-111-017 $32.04 357-111-019 $32.04 357-111-020 $32.04 357-111-022 $32.04 357-111-023 $32.04 357-111-024 $32.04 357-111-025 $32.04 357-111-026 $32.04 357-111-027 $32.04 357-111-028 $32.04 357-111-029 $32.04 357-111-031 $16.02 357-111-034 $32.04 357-111-035 $32.04 357-111-036 $32.04 357-112-001 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-112-002 $32.04 357-112-003 $32.04 357-112-004 $32.04 357-112-005 $32.04 357-112-006 $32.04 357-112-007 $32.04 357-112-008 $32.04 357-112-009 $32.04 357-112-010 $32.04 357-112-011 $32.04 357-112-013 $32.04 357-112-014 $32.04 357-112-016 $32.04 357-112-017 $32.04 357-112-018 $32.04 357-112-019 $32.04 357-112-020 $32.04 357-112-021 $32.04 357-112-022 $32.04 357-112-023 $32.04 357-112-025 $32.04 357-112-026 $32.04 357-112-027 $32.04 357-113-001 $32.04 357-113-002 $32.04 357-113-003 $32.04 357-120-002 $32.04 357-120-003 $16.02 357-120-013 $32.04 357-120-014 $32.04 357-120-015 $32.04 357-120-016 $32.04 357-120-017 $32.04 357-120-018 $32.04 357-120-019 $32.04 357-120-020 $32.04 357-120-021 $32.04 357-120-022 $32.04 357-120-023 $32.04 357-120-024 $32.04 357-120-025 $32.04 357-120-026 $32.04 357-120-027 $32.04 357-120-028 $32.04 357-120-029 $32.04 357-120-030 $32.04 357-120-031 $32.04 357-120-032 $32.04 357-120-033 $32.04 357-120-034 $32.04 357-120-035 $32.04 357-120-036 $32.04 357-120-037 $32.04 357-120-038 $32.04 357-120-039 $32.04 357-120-040 $32.04 64 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-120-041 $32.04 357-120-042 $32.04 357-120-043 $32.04 357-120-044 $32.04 357-120-045 $32.04 357-120-046 $32.04 357-120-047 $32.04 357-120-048 $32.04 357-120-049 $32.04 357-120-050 $32.04 357-120-051 $32.04 357-120-052 $32.04 357-120-053 $32.04 357-120-054 $32.04 357-120-055 $32.04 357-120-056 $32.04 357-120-057 $32.04 357-120-058 $32.04 357-120-059 $32.04 357-120-060 $32.04 357-120-061 $32.04 357-120-062 $32.04 357-120-063 $32.04 357-120-064 $32.04 357-120-065 $32.04 357-120-066 $32.04 357-120-067 $32.04 357-120-068 $32.04 357-120-069 $32.04 357-120-070 $32.04 357-120-073 $801.00 357-131-001 $32.04 357-131-003 $32.04 357-131-005 $32.04 357-131-006 $32.04 357-131-007 $32.04 357-131-010 $32.04 357-131-012 $32.04 357-131-013 $32.04 357-131-014 $32.04 357-131-015 $32.04 357-131-016 $32.04 357-131-017 $32.04 357-131-019 $32.04 357-131-020 $32.04 357-131-021 $32.04 357-131-023 $32.04 357-132-017 $96.12 357-132-018 $32.04 357-132-019 $32.04 357-140-010 $16.02 357-140-011 $32.04 357-140-016 $16.02 357-140-032 $32.04 357-140-033 $240.30 357-140-037 $16.02 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-140-039 $32.04 357-140-041 $32.04 357-140-043 $32.04 357-140-044 $32.04 357-140-045 $16.02 357-140-046 $176.22 357-140-047 $48.06 357-140-054 $32.04 357-140-056 $16.02 357-140-057 $16.02 357-140-058 $16.02 357-140-059 $16.02 357-140-060 $16.02 357-151-002 $16.02 357-151-008 $32.04 357-151-013 $32.04 357-151-014 $32.04 357-151-020 $32.04 357-151-027 $144.18 357-151-028 $16.02 357-151-029 $16.02 357-151-030 $16.02 357-151-031 $32.04 357-151-032 $32.04 357-151-035 $32.04 357-151-036 $208.26 357-151-037 $32.04 357-152-001 $32.04 357-152-002 $32.04 357-152-003 $32.04 357-152-004 $32.04 357-152-006 $32.04 357-152-007 $32.04 357-152-010 $32.04 357-152-011 $32.04 357-152-012 $32.04 357-152-014 $48.06 357-152-015 $32.04 357-152-016 $32.04 357-152-017 $32.04 357-152-018 $32.04 357-152-019 $32.04 357-152-020 $32.04 357-152-021 $32.04 357-152-022 $32.04 357-152-027 $96.12 357-152-031 $160.20 357-152-033 $64.08 357-152-034 $32.04 357-152-035 $32.04 357-152-036 $32.04 357-152-037 $32.04 357-161-006 $32.04 357-161-007 $32.04 357-161-008 $32.04 357-161-009 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-161-010 $32.04 357-162-002 $32.04 357-162-003 $32.04 357-162-005 $32.04 357-162-006 $32.04 357-162-007 $32.04 357-162-010 $32.04 357-162-011 $32.04 357-162-012 $32.04 357-162-017 $32.04 357-162-018 $48.06 357-162-019 $32.04 357-162-028 $32.04 357-162-029 $32.04 357-162-032 $32.04 357-162-033 $32.04 357-162-034 $32.04 357-163-005 $32.04 357-163-006 $32.04 357-163-007 $32.04 357-163-010 $32.04 357-163-016 $32.04 357-163-017 $32.04 357-163-025 $144.18 357-163-026 $48.06 357-163-027 $64.08 357-163-028 $32.04 357-163-031 $32.04 357-171-001 $32.04 357-171-002 $16.02 357-171-003 $32.04 357-171-004 $32.04 357-171-005 $32.04 357-171-008 $16.02 357-171-009 $32.04 357-171-010 $16.02 357-171-013 $64.08 357-171-014 $128.16 357-171-016 $96.12 357-171-018 $160.20 357-171-019 $32.04 357-171-020 $16.02 357-172-005 $48.06 357-172-006 $48.06 357-173-002 $32.04 357-173-003 $32.04 357-173-004 $32.04 357-173-005 $32.04 357-173-006 $32.04 357-173-007 $32.04 357-173-008 $32.04 357-173-009 $32.04 357-173-010 $32.04 357-173-011 $32.04 357-173-012 $32.04 357-173-013 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-173-014 $32.04 357-173-015 $32.04 357-173-016 $32.04 357-173-018 $32.04 357-173-019 $32.04 357-173-020 $32.04 357-174-001 $32.04 357-174-002 $32.04 357-174-003 $32.04 357-174-004 $32.04 357-174-005 $32.04 357-174-006 $32.04 357-174-007 $32.04 357-174-008 $32.04 357-174-009 $32.04 357-174-010 $32.04 357-174-011 $32.04 357-174-012 $32.04 357-174-013 $32.04 357-174-014 $32.04 357-174-015 $32.04 357-174-016 $32.04 357-174-017 $32.04 357-174-018 $32.04 357-174-019 $32.04 357-174-020 $32.04 357-174-021 $32.04 357-174-022 $32.04 357-175-001 $32.04 357-175-002 $32.04 357-175-003 $32.04 357-175-004 $32.04 357-175-005 $32.04 357-175-006 $32.04 357-175-007 $32.04 357-175-008 $32.04 357-175-009 $32.04 357-181-001 $32.04 357-181-002 $32.04 357-181-003 $32.04 357-181-004 $32.04 357-181-009 $320.40 357-181-010 $32.04 357-181-011 $32.04 357-182-001 $32.04 357-182-008 $32.04 357-182-010 $48.06 357-182-011 $64.08 357-182-012 $80.10 357-183-001 $80.10 357-183-002 $32.04 357-183-003 $32.04 357-183-004 $64.08 357-183-005 $32.04 357-183-006 $144.18 357-183-007 $32.04 65 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-183-008 $32.04 357-183-009 $32.04 357-183-010 $32.04 357-183-011 $32.04 357-183-012 $32.04 357-183-013 $32.04 357-183-014 $32.04 357-183-015 $128.16 357-184-001 $32.04 357-184-004 $32.04 357-184-005 $32.04 357-184-007 $32.04 357-184-008 $32.04 357-184-009 $32.04 357-184-010 $32.04 357-184-011 $32.04 357-184-012 $16.02 357-184-013 $16.02 357-184-014 $32.04 357-185-001 $32.04 357-186-002 $32.04 357-186-004 $32.04 357-186-005 $32.04 357-186-008 $32.04 357-186-013 $32.04 357-186-014 $16.02 357-186-015 $32.04 357-191-001 $32.04 357-191-002 $32.04 357-191-003 $32.04 357-191-004 $32.04 357-191-005 $32.04 357-191-006 $32.04 357-191-007 $32.04 357-191-008 $32.04 357-191-009 $32.04 357-191-010 $32.04 357-191-011 $32.04 357-191-012 $32.04 357-191-014 $32.04 357-191-015 $32.04 357-191-016 $32.04 357-191-017 $32.04 357-191-018 $32.04 357-191-019 $32.04 357-191-020 $32.04 357-191-022 $32.04 357-191-023 $32.04 357-191-024 $32.04 357-191-025 $32.04 357-191-026 $16.02 357-192-001 $32.04 357-192-002 $32.04 357-192-003 $32.04 357-192-004 $32.04 357-192-005 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-192-006 $32.04 357-192-007 $32.04 357-192-008 $32.04 357-192-009 $32.04 357-192-010 $32.04 357-193-006 $32.04 357-193-007 $32.04 357-193-008 $32.04 357-193-009 $32.04 357-193-010 $32.04 357-193-011 $32.04 357-193-012 $32.04 357-193-013 $32.04 357-194-001 $16.02 357-194-003 $32.04 357-194-004 $32.04 357-194-005 $32.04 357-194-006 $32.04 357-195-001 $32.04 357-195-002 $32.04 357-195-003 $32.04 357-195-007 $32.04 357-195-009 $32.04 357-195-010 $32.04 357-195-012 $32.04 357-195-013 $32.04 357-195-014 $32.04 357-195-015 $32.04 357-195-016 $32.04 357-195-017 $32.04 357-195-018 $32.04 357-195-019 $32.04 357-195-020 $32.04 357-196-004 $32.04 357-196-005 $32.04 357-196-006 $32.04 357-196-007 $32.04 357-196-008 $32.04 357-196-009 $32.04 357-196-010 $16.02 357-196-011 $32.04 357-196-012 $16.02 357-196-013 $32.04 357-196-014 $32.04 357-196-015 $32.04 357-196-016 $32.04 357-196-017 $32.04 357-197-002 $32.04 357-197-005 $32.04 357-197-006 $32.04 357-197-007 $32.04 357-197-008 $32.04 357-197-009 $32.04 357-197-010 $32.04 357-197-011 $32.04 357-197-012 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-197-013 $32.04 357-197-014 $32.04 357-197-015 $32.04 357-197-016 $32.04 357-198-001 $32.04 357-198-002 $32.04 357-198-003 $32.04 357-198-004 $32.04 357-198-005 $32.04 357-198-007 $32.04 357-198-009 $32.04 357-198-011 $32.04 357-198-012 $32.04 357-198-013 $32.04 357-198-014 $32.04 357-198-015 $32.04 357-198-016 $32.04 357-199-001 $32.04 357-199-002 $32.04 357-199-003 $32.04 357-199-004 $32.04 357-199-005 $32.04 357-201-001 $32.04 357-201-002 $32.04 357-201-003 $32.04 357-201-004 $32.04 357-201-005 $32.04 357-201-006 $32.04 357-201-007 $32.04 357-201-008 $32.04 357-201-009 $32.04 357-201-016 $48.06 357-201-017 $32.04 357-201-018 $32.04 357-201-019 $32.04 357-201-020 $32.04 357-201-021 $32.04 357-201-022 $32.04 357-201-023 $32.04 357-201-024 $32.04 357-201-025 $32.04 357-201-026 $32.04 357-201-027 $32.04 357-201-029 $32.04 357-202-001 $32.04 357-202-002 $32.04 357-202-003 $32.04 357-202-005 $32.04 357-202-006 $32.04 357-202-007 $32.04 357-202-008 $32.04 357-202-009 $32.04 357-202-013 $32.04 357-202-014 $32.04 357-202-015 $32.04 357-202-016 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-202-017 $32.04 357-202-018 $32.04 357-202-019 $32.04 357-202-020 $32.04 357-202-021 $32.04 357-202-022 $32.04 357-202-023 $32.04 357-202-024 $32.04 357-203-002 $32.04 357-203-003 $32.04 357-203-004 $32.04 357-203-005 $32.04 357-203-006 $32.04 357-203-007 $32.04 357-203-008 $32.04 357-203-009 $32.04 357-203-010 $32.04 357-203-011 $32.04 357-203-012 $32.04 357-203-013 $32.04 357-203-014 $32.04 357-204-003 $32.04 357-204-006 $32.04 357-204-007 $32.04 357-204-009 $32.04 357-204-010 $32.04 357-204-012 $80.10 357-204-013 $32.04 357-204-014 $32.04 357-204-015 $80.10 357-204-017 $32.04 357-204-018 $32.04 357-210-004 $48.06 357-210-007 $16.02 357-210-008 $48.06 357-210-009 $48.06 357-210-010 $48.06 357-210-011 $48.06 357-221-001 $32.04 357-221-002 $32.04 357-221-003 $32.04 357-221-004 $32.04 357-221-005 $32.04 357-221-006 $32.04 357-221-007 $32.04 357-221-008 $32.04 357-221-009 $32.04 357-221-010 $32.04 357-221-011 $32.04 357-221-012 $32.04 357-221-013 $32.04 357-221-014 $32.04 357-221-015 $32.04 357-222-001 $32.04 357-222-002 $32.04 357-222-003 $32.04 66 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-222-004 $32.04 357-222-005 $32.04 357-222-006 $32.04 357-222-007 $32.04 357-222-008 $32.04 357-222-009 $32.04 357-222-010 $32.04 357-222-011 $32.04 357-222-012 $32.04 357-222-013 $32.04 357-222-014 $32.04 357-222-015 $32.04 357-222-016 $32.04 357-222-017 $32.04 357-222-018 $32.04 357-222-019 $32.04 357-222-020 $32.04 357-222-021 $32.04 357-222-022 $32.04 357-223-001 $32.04 357-223-002 $32.04 357-223-003 $32.04 357-223-004 $32.04 357-223-005 $32.04 357-223-006 $32.04 357-223-007 $32.04 357-223-008 $32.04 357-223-009 $32.04 357-223-010 $32.04 357-223-011 $32.04 357-223-012 $32.04 357-223-013 $32.04 357-223-014 $32.04 357-223-015 $32.04 357-223-016 $32.04 357-223-017 $32.04 357-223-018 $32.04 357-223-019 $32.04 357-223-020 $32.04 357-223-021 $32.04 357-223-022 $32.04 357-223-023 $32.04 357-223-024 $32.04 357-223-025 $32.04 357-223-026 $32.04 357-223-027 $32.04 357-223-028 $32.04 357-223-029 $32.04 357-224-001 $32.04 357-224-002 $32.04 357-224-003 $32.04 357-224-004 $32.04 357-224-005 $32.04 357-224-006 $32.04 357-224-007 $32.04 357-224-008 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-224-009 $32.04 357-224-010 $32.04 357-224-011 $32.04 357-224-012 $32.04 357-224-013 $16.02 357-224-014 $32.04 357-224-015 $32.04 357-224-016 $32.04 357-224-017 $32.04 357-224-018 $32.04 357-224-021 $32.04 357-224-022 $32.04 357-224-023 $32.04 357-224-024 $32.04 357-224-025 $32.04 357-224-026 $32.04 357-224-028 $32.04 357-224-032 $32.04 357-225-001 $32.04 357-225-002 $32.04 357-225-003 $32.04 357-225-006 $32.04 357-225-007 $32.04 357-225-008 $32.04 357-225-009 $32.04 357-225-010 $32.04 357-225-011 $32.04 357-225-012 $32.04 357-225-013 $32.04 357-225-014 $32.04 357-225-015 $32.04 357-225-016 $32.04 357-225-017 $32.04 357-225-018 $32.04 357-225-019 $32.04 357-225-020 $32.04 357-226-001 $32.04 357-226-002 $32.04 357-226-003 $32.04 357-226-004 $32.04 357-226-005 $32.04 357-226-006 $32.04 357-226-007 $32.04 357-226-008 $32.04 357-226-009 $32.04 357-226-010 $32.04 357-226-011 $32.04 357-231-001 $32.04 357-231-002 $32.04 357-231-003 $32.04 357-231-004 $32.04 357-231-005 $32.04 357-231-006 $32.04 357-231-007 $32.04 357-231-008 $32.04 357-231-009 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-231-010 $32.04 357-231-011 $32.04 357-231-012 $32.04 357-231-013 $32.04 357-231-014 $32.04 357-231-015 $32.04 357-231-016 $32.04 357-231-017 $32.04 357-231-018 $32.04 357-231-019 $32.04 357-231-020 $32.04 357-231-023 $32.04 357-231-024 $32.04 357-231-025 $32.04 357-231-026 $32.04 357-231-028 $32.04 357-231-029 $32.04 357-231-030 $32.04 357-231-031 $48.06 357-231-032 $32.04 357-231-033 $32.04 357-231-034 $32.04 357-231-035 $32.04 357-231-036 $32.04 357-231-037 $32.04 357-231-038 $32.04 357-231-039 $32.04 357-231-040 $32.04 357-231-041 $32.04 357-231-042 $32.04 357-231-043 $32.04 357-231-044 $32.04 357-231-045 $32.04 357-232-001 $32.04 357-232-002 $32.04 357-232-003 $32.04 357-232-004 $32.04 357-232-005 $32.04 357-232-006 $32.04 357-232-007 $32.04 357-232-008 $32.04 357-232-009 $32.04 357-232-010 $32.04 357-232-012 $32.04 357-241-001 $32.04 357-241-002 $32.04 357-241-003 $32.04 357-241-004 $32.04 357-241-005 $32.04 357-241-006 $32.04 357-241-007 $32.04 357-241-008 $32.04 357-241-009 $32.04 357-241-010 $32.04 357-241-011 $32.04 357-241-012 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-241-013 $32.04 357-241-014 $32.04 357-241-015 $32.04 357-241-016 $32.04 357-241-017 $32.04 357-241-018 $32.04 357-241-019 $32.04 357-241-020 $32.04 357-241-021 $32.04 357-241-022 $32.04 357-241-023 $32.04 357-241-024 $32.04 357-242-001 $32.04 357-242-002 $32.04 357-242-003 $32.04 357-242-004 $32.04 357-242-005 $32.04 357-242-006 $32.04 357-242-007 $32.04 357-242-008 $32.04 357-242-009 $32.04 357-242-010 $32.04 357-242-011 $32.04 357-242-012 $32.04 357-242-013 $32.04 357-242-014 $32.04 357-242-015 $32.04 357-242-016 $32.04 357-242-017 $32.04 357-242-018 $32.04 357-242-019 $32.04 357-242-020 $32.04 357-242-021 $32.04 357-242-022 $32.04 357-242-023 $32.04 357-242-024 $32.04 357-242-025 $32.04 357-242-026 $32.04 357-242-027 $32.04 357-242-029 $32.04 357-242-030 $32.04 357-242-031 $32.04 357-242-032 $32.04 357-242-033 $32.04 357-242-034 $32.04 357-242-035 $32.04 357-242-036 $32.04 357-242-037 $32.04 357-242-038 $32.04 357-242-039 $32.04 357-243-001 $32.04 357-243-002 $32.04 357-243-003 $32.04 357-243-004 $32.04 357-243-005 $32.04 357-243-006 $32.04 67 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-243-007 $32.04 357-243-008 $32.04 357-243-009 $32.04 357-243-010 $32.04 357-243-011 $32.04 357-243-012 $32.04 357-243-013 $32.04 357-243-014 $32.04 357-243-015 $32.04 357-243-016 $32.04 357-243-017 $32.04 357-243-018 $32.04 357-243-019 $32.04 357-243-020 $32.04 357-243-021 $32.04 357-243-022 $32.04 357-243-023 $32.04 357-243-024 $32.04 357-243-025 $32.04 357-243-026 $32.04 357-243-027 $32.04 357-243-028 $32.04 357-243-031 $32.04 357-251-001 $32.04 357-251-002 $32.04 357-251-003 $32.04 357-251-004 $32.04 357-251-005 $32.04 357-251-006 $32.04 357-251-007 $32.04 357-251-008 $32.04 357-251-009 $32.04 357-251-010 $32.04 357-251-011 $32.04 357-251-012 $32.04 357-251-013 $32.04 357-251-014 $32.04 357-251-015 $32.04 357-251-016 $32.04 357-251-017 $32.04 357-251-018 $32.04 357-251-019 $32.04 357-251-020 $32.04 357-251-021 $32.04 357-251-022 $32.04 357-251-023 $32.04 357-251-024 $32.04 357-251-025 $32.04 357-251-027 $32.04 357-251-028 $32.04 357-251-030 $32.04 357-251-031 $32.04 357-251-032 $32.04 357-251-033 $32.04 357-251-034 $32.04 357-251-035 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-251-036 $32.04 357-251-037 $32.04 357-251-038 $32.04 357-251-039 $32.04 357-251-040 $32.04 357-251-041 $32.04 357-251-042 $32.04 357-251-043 $32.04 357-251-044 $32.04 357-251-045 $32.04 357-251-046 $32.04 357-251-047 $32.04 357-251-048 $32.04 357-251-049 $32.04 357-251-050 $32.04 357-252-001 $32.04 357-252-002 $32.04 357-252-003 $32.04 357-252-004 $32.04 357-252-005 $32.04 357-252-006 $32.04 357-252-007 $32.04 357-252-008 $32.04 357-252-009 $32.04 357-252-010 $32.04 357-252-011 $32.04 357-252-012 $32.04 357-252-013 $32.04 357-252-018 $32.04 357-252-019 $32.04 357-252-020 $32.04 357-252-021 $32.04 357-252-022 $32.04 357-252-023 $32.04 357-252-024 $32.04 357-260-004 $32.04 357-260-005 $16.02 357-260-006 $16.02 357-260-007 $16.02 357-260-008 $32.04 357-260-009 $32.04 357-260-010 $32.04 357-260-011 $32.04 357-260-012 $32.04 357-260-013 $32.04 357-260-014 $32.04 357-260-015 $32.04 357-260-016 $32.04 357-260-017 $32.04 357-260-018 $32.04 357-260-019 $32.04 357-260-020 $32.04 357-260-021 $32.04 357-260-022 $32.04 357-260-023 $32.04 357-260-024 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-260-025 $32.04 357-260-028 $32.04 357-260-029 $32.04 357-260-030 $32.04 357-260-031 $32.04 357-260-032 $32.04 357-260-033 $32.04 357-260-034 $32.04 357-260-035 $32.04 357-260-036 $32.04 357-260-037 $32.04 357-260-038 $32.04 357-260-039 $32.04 357-260-040 $32.04 357-260-041 $32.04 357-260-042 $32.04 357-260-043 $32.04 357-260-044 $32.04 357-260-045 $32.04 357-260-046 $32.04 357-260-047 $32.04 357-260-048 $32.04 357-260-049 $32.04 357-260-050 $32.04 357-260-052 $96.12 357-260-061 $32.04 357-260-062 $32.04 357-260-063 $32.04 357-260-065 $32.04 357-260-066 $32.04 357-260-067 $32.04 357-260-068 $32.04 357-260-069 $32.04 357-260-070 $32.04 357-260-071 $16.02 357-271-001 $32.04 357-271-002 $32.04 357-271-003 $32.04 357-271-004 $32.04 357-271-005 $32.04 357-271-006 $32.04 357-271-007 $32.04 357-271-011 $32.04 357-272-001 $32.04 357-272-002 $32.04 357-272-003 $32.04 357-272-004 $32.04 357-272-005 $32.04 357-272-006 $32.04 357-272-007 $32.04 357-272-010 $32.04 357-272-011 $32.04 357-272-012 $32.04 357-272-013 $32.04 357-272-014 $32.04 357-272-015 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-272-016 $32.04 357-272-017 $32.04 357-272-018 $32.04 357-273-001 $32.04 357-273-002 $32.04 357-273-003 $32.04 357-273-004 $32.04 357-273-005 $32.04 357-273-006 $32.04 357-273-007 $32.04 357-273-008 $32.04 357-273-009 $32.04 357-273-010 $32.04 357-273-011 $32.04 357-273-012 $32.04 357-273-013 $32.04 357-273-014 $32.04 357-273-015 $32.04 357-273-016 $32.04 357-273-017 $32.04 357-274-009 $32.04 357-274-010 $32.04 357-274-011 $32.04 357-274-012 $32.04 357-274-019 $32.04 357-274-020 $32.04 357-274-023 $32.04 357-274-024 $32.04 357-274-025 $32.04 357-274-026 $32.04 357-274-027 $32.04 357-274-028 $32.04 357-274-029 $32.04 357-274-034 $32.04 357-274-035 $32.04 357-274-046 $32.04 357-274-048 $32.04 357-274-049 $16.02 357-274-050 $16.02 357-281-001 $32.04 357-281-002 $32.04 357-281-003 $32.04 357-281-004 $32.04 357-281-005 $16.02 357-281-006 $32.04 357-281-007 $32.04 357-281-008 $32.04 357-281-009 $32.04 357-281-010 $32.04 357-281-011 $32.04 357-281-012 $32.04 357-281-013 $32.04 357-281-014 $32.04 357-281-015 $32.04 357-281-016 $32.04 357-281-019 $32.04 68 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-282-001 $32.04 357-282-002 $32.04 357-282-005 $32.04 357-282-006 $32.04 357-282-007 $32.04 357-282-008 $32.04 357-282-009 $32.04 357-282-010 $32.04 357-282-011 $32.04 357-282-012 $32.04 357-282-013 $32.04 357-282-014 $32.04 357-282-015 $32.04 357-282-016 $32.04 357-282-017 $32.04 357-282-018 $32.04 357-282-019 $32.04 357-282-020 $32.04 357-282-021 $32.04 357-282-022 $32.04 357-282-023 $32.04 357-282-024 $32.04 357-282-025 $32.04 357-282-026 $32.04 357-282-027 $32.04 357-282-028 $32.04 357-282-029 $32.04 357-282-030 $32.04 357-282-031 $32.04 357-282-032 $32.04 357-282-033 $32.04 357-282-035 $32.04 357-282-036 $32.04 357-282-037 $32.04 357-282-038 $32.04 357-282-039 $32.04 357-283-001 $32.04 357-283-002 $32.04 357-283-003 $32.04 357-283-004 $32.04 357-283-005 $32.04 357-283-006 $32.04 357-283-007 $32.04 357-283-008 $32.04 357-283-009 $32.04 357-283-010 $32.04 357-291-001 $48.06 357-292-002 $32.04 357-292-003 $32.04 357-292-004 $32.04 357-292-005 $32.04 357-292-006 $32.04 357-292-007 $32.04 357-292-008 $32.04 357-292-009 $32.04 357-292-010 $32.04 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 357-292-011 $32.04 357-292-014 $32.04 357-292-015 $32.04 357-292-016 $32.04 357-292-017 $16.02 357-292-018 $32.04 357-293-001 $32.04 357-293-002 $32.04 357-293-003 $32.04 357-293-004 $32.04 357-293-005 $32.04 357-293-006 $32.04 357-293-007 $32.04 357-293-008 $32.04 357-293-009 $32.04 357-293-011 $32.04 357-310-005 $48.06 357-310-006 $48.06 357-363-001 $4,005.00 357-371-002 $32.04 357-371-005 $16.02 357-371-006 $16.02 357-371-007 $16.02 357-371-008 $16.02 357-371-012 $32.04 357-371-013 $16.02 357-371-014 $16.02 357-371-015 $16.02 357-371-016 $32.04 357-371-017 $32.04 357-371-018 $32.04 357-371-019 $32.04 357-371-020 $32.04 357-371-022 $32.04 357-371-023 $32.04 357-371-024 $32.04 357-371-025 $32.04 357-371-028 $32.04 357-371-029 $32.04 357-371-030 $32.04 357-371-031 $32.04 357-371-032 $32.04 357-371-033 $32.04 357-371-034 $32.04 358-080-001 $27.24 358-080-002 $27.24 358-080-003 $27.24 358-080-004 $27.24 358-080-005 $27.24 358-080-006 $27.24 358-080-007 $27.24 358-080-008 $27.24 358-080-009 $27.24 358-080-010 $27.24 358-080-011 $27.24 358-091-001 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-091-002 $27.24 358-091-003 $27.24 358-091-004 $27.24 358-091-005 $27.24 358-091-006 $27.24 358-091-007 $27.24 358-091-008 $27.24 358-091-009 $27.24 358-091-010 $27.24 358-091-011 $27.24 358-091-012 $27.24 358-091-013 $27.24 358-091-014 $27.24 358-091-015 $27.24 358-091-016 $27.24 358-091-017 $27.24 358-091-018 $27.24 358-091-019 $27.24 358-092-001 $27.24 358-092-002 $27.24 358-092-003 $27.24 358-092-004 $27.24 358-092-005 $27.24 358-092-006 $27.24 358-092-007 $27.24 358-092-008 $27.24 358-092-009 $27.24 358-092-010 $27.24 358-092-011 $27.24 358-093-001 $27.24 358-093-002 $27.24 358-093-003 $27.24 358-093-004 $27.24 358-093-005 $27.24 358-093-006 $27.24 358-093-007 $27.24 358-093-008 $27.24 358-093-009 $27.24 358-093-010 $27.24 358-093-011 $27.24 358-101-001 $27.24 358-101-002 $27.24 358-101-003 $27.24 358-101-004 $27.24 358-101-005 $27.24 358-101-006 $27.24 358-101-007 $27.24 358-101-008 $27.24 358-101-009 $27.24 358-101-010 $27.24 358-101-011 $27.24 358-101-012 $27.24 358-101-013 $27.24 358-101-014 $27.24 358-101-015 $27.24 358-102-001 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-102-002 $27.24 358-102-003 $27.24 358-102-004 $27.24 358-102-005 $27.24 358-102-006 $27.24 358-102-007 $27.24 358-102-008 $27.24 358-102-009 $27.24 358-102-010 $27.24 358-102-011 $27.24 358-102-012 $27.24 358-102-013 $27.24 358-102-014 $27.24 358-102-015 $27.24 358-102-016 $27.24 358-102-017 $27.24 358-103-001 $27.24 358-103-002 $27.24 358-103-003 $27.24 358-103-004 $27.24 358-103-005 $27.24 358-103-006 $27.24 358-103-007 $27.24 358-103-008 $27.24 358-103-009 $27.24 358-103-010 $27.24 358-103-011 $27.24 358-103-012 $27.24 358-103-013 $27.24 358-103-014 $27.24 358-103-015 $27.24 358-103-016 $27.24 358-103-017 $27.24 358-103-018 $27.24 358-103-019 $27.24 358-103-020 $27.24 358-103-021 $27.24 358-103-022 $27.24 358-103-023 $27.24 358-103-024 $27.24 358-103-025 $27.24 358-103-026 $27.24 358-103-027 $27.24 358-103-028 $27.24 358-104-001 $27.24 358-104-002 $27.24 358-104-003 $27.24 358-104-004 $27.24 358-104-005 $27.24 358-104-006 $27.24 358-104-007 $27.24 358-104-008 $27.24 358-104-009 $27.24 358-104-010 $27.24 358-104-011 $27.24 358-104-012 $27.24 69 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-104-013 $27.24 358-104-014 $27.24 358-104-015 $27.24 358-104-016 $27.24 358-104-017 $27.24 358-104-018 $27.24 358-104-019 $27.24 358-104-020 $27.24 358-104-021 $27.24 358-104-022 $27.24 358-111-001 $27.24 358-111-002 $27.24 358-111-003 $27.24 358-111-004 $27.24 358-111-005 $27.24 358-111-006 $27.24 358-111-007 $27.24 358-111-008 $27.24 358-111-009 $27.24 358-111-010 $27.24 358-111-011 $27.24 358-111-012 $27.24 358-111-013 $27.24 358-111-014 $27.24 358-111-015 $27.24 358-111-016 $27.24 358-111-017 $27.24 358-111-018 $27.24 358-111-019 $27.24 358-111-020 $27.24 358-111-021 $27.24 358-111-022 $27.24 358-111-023 $27.24 358-111-024 $27.24 358-111-025 $27.24 358-111-026 $27.24 358-111-027 $27.24 358-111-028 $27.24 358-111-029 $27.24 358-111-030 $27.24 358-111-031 $27.24 358-111-032 $27.24 358-112-001 $27.24 358-112-002 $27.24 358-112-003 $27.24 358-112-004 $27.24 358-112-005 $27.24 358-112-006 $27.24 358-112-007 $27.24 358-112-008 $27.24 358-112-009 $27.24 358-112-010 $27.24 358-112-011 $27.24 358-112-012 $27.24 358-112-013 $27.24 358-112-014 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-112-015 $27.24 358-112-016 $27.24 358-112-017 $27.24 358-112-018 $27.24 358-120-001 $27.24 358-120-002 $27.24 358-120-003 $27.24 358-120-004 $27.24 358-120-005 $27.24 358-120-006 $27.24 358-120-007 $27.24 358-120-008 $27.24 358-120-009 $27.24 358-120-010 $27.24 358-120-011 $27.24 358-120-012 $27.24 358-120-013 $27.24 358-120-014 $27.24 358-120-015 $27.24 358-120-016 $27.24 358-120-017 $27.24 358-120-018 $27.24 358-120-019 $27.24 358-120-020 $27.24 358-120-021 $27.24 358-120-022 $27.24 358-120-023 $27.24 358-151-001 $27.24 358-151-002 $27.24 358-151-003 $27.24 358-151-004 $27.24 358-151-005 $27.24 358-151-006 $27.24 358-151-007 $27.24 358-151-010 $27.24 358-151-011 $27.24 358-151-012 $27.24 358-151-013 $27.24 358-151-014 $27.24 358-151-015 $27.24 358-151-016 $27.24 358-151-017 $27.24 358-151-019 $27.24 358-151-020 $27.24 358-151-021 $27.24 358-151-022 $27.24 358-151-023 $27.24 358-151-024 $27.24 358-151-026 $27.24 358-151-027 $27.24 358-151-028 $27.24 358-152-001 $27.24 358-152-002 $27.24 358-152-003 $27.24 358-152-004 $27.24 358-152-005 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-152-006 $27.24 358-152-007 $27.24 358-152-008 $27.24 358-152-009 $27.24 358-152-010 $27.24 358-152-011 $27.24 358-152-012 $27.24 358-152-013 $27.24 358-152-014 $27.24 358-152-015 $27.24 358-152-016 $27.24 358-152-017 $27.24 358-152-018 $27.24 358-152-019 $27.24 358-152-020 $27.24 358-152-021 $27.24 358-152-022 $27.24 358-152-023 $27.24 358-152-024 $27.24 358-152-025 $27.24 358-161-001 $27.24 358-161-002 $27.24 358-161-003 $27.24 358-161-004 $27.24 358-161-005 $27.24 358-161-006 $27.24 358-161-007 $27.24 358-162-001 $27.24 358-162-002 $27.24 358-162-003 $27.24 358-162-004 $27.24 358-162-005 $27.24 358-162-006 $27.24 358-162-007 $27.24 358-162-008 $27.24 358-162-009 $27.24 358-162-010 $27.24 358-163-001 $27.24 358-163-002 $27.24 358-163-003 $27.24 358-163-004 $27.24 358-163-005 $27.24 358-163-006 $27.24 358-163-007 $27.24 358-163-008 $27.24 358-163-009 $27.24 358-163-013 $27.24 358-163-014 $27.24 358-163-015 $27.24 358-163-016 $27.24 358-163-017 $27.24 358-163-018 $27.24 358-163-019 $27.24 358-163-020 $27.24 358-163-021 $27.24 358-163-022 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-163-023 $27.24 358-163-024 $27.24 358-163-025 $27.24 358-163-026 $27.24 358-163-027 $27.24 358-163-028 $27.24 358-163-029 $27.24 358-163-030 $27.24 358-163-031 $27.24 358-163-032 $27.24 358-163-033 $27.24 358-163-034 $27.24 358-163-036 $27.24 358-164-001 $27.24 358-164-002 $27.24 358-164-003 $27.24 358-164-004 $27.24 358-164-005 $27.24 358-164-006 $27.24 358-164-007 $27.24 358-164-008 $27.24 358-164-009 $27.24 358-164-010 $27.24 358-164-011 $27.24 358-164-012 $27.24 358-171-001 $27.24 358-171-002 $27.24 358-171-003 $27.24 358-171-004 $27.24 358-171-005 $27.24 358-171-006 $27.24 358-171-007 $27.24 358-171-008 $27.24 358-171-009 $27.24 358-171-010 $27.24 358-171-011 $27.24 358-171-012 $27.24 358-171-013 $27.24 358-171-014 $27.24 358-171-015 $27.24 358-172-001 $27.24 358-172-002 $27.24 358-173-001 $27.24 358-173-002 $27.24 358-173-003 $27.24 358-173-004 $27.24 358-173-005 $27.24 358-173-006 $27.24 358-173-007 $27.24 358-173-008 $27.24 358-173-009 $27.24 358-173-010 $27.24 358-173-011 $27.24 358-173-012 $27.24 358-173-013 $27.24 358-173-014 $27.24 70 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-173-015 $27.24 358-173-016 $27.24 358-173-017 $27.24 358-173-018 $27.24 358-173-019 $27.24 358-173-020 $27.24 358-174-001 $27.24 358-174-002 $27.24 358-174-003 $27.24 358-174-004 $27.24 358-174-005 $27.24 358-174-006 $27.24 358-174-007 $27.24 358-174-008 $27.24 358-174-009 $27.24 358-174-010 $27.24 358-181-001 $27.24 358-181-002 $27.24 358-181-003 $27.24 358-181-004 $27.24 358-181-005 $27.24 358-181-006 $27.24 358-181-007 $27.24 358-181-008 $27.24 358-181-009 $27.24 358-181-010 $27.24 358-181-011 $27.24 358-181-012 $27.24 358-181-013 $27.24 358-181-014 $27.24 358-181-015 $27.24 358-181-016 $27.24 358-181-017 $27.24 358-181-018 $27.24 358-181-019 $27.24 358-181-020 $27.24 358-181-021 $27.24 358-181-022 $27.24 358-181-023 $27.24 358-181-024 $27.24 358-181-025 $27.24 358-181-026 $27.24 358-181-027 $27.24 358-181-028 $27.24 358-181-029 $27.24 358-181-030 $27.24 358-181-031 $27.24 358-181-032 $27.24 358-181-033 $27.24 358-181-034 $27.24 358-181-037 $27.24 358-181-038 $27.24 358-181-039 $27.24 358-181-040 $27.24 358-181-042 $27.24 358-181-043 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-182-001 $27.24 358-182-002 $27.24 358-182-003 $27.24 358-182-004 $27.24 358-182-005 $27.24 358-182-006 $27.24 358-182-007 $27.24 358-182-008 $27.24 358-182-009 $27.24 358-182-010 $27.24 358-182-011 $27.24 358-182-012 $27.24 358-182-013 $27.24 358-183-001 $27.24 358-183-002 $27.24 358-183-003 $27.24 358-183-004 $27.24 358-183-005 $27.24 358-183-006 $27.24 358-183-007 $27.24 358-183-008 $27.24 358-183-009 $27.24 358-183-010 $27.24 358-183-011 $27.24 358-183-012 $27.24 358-183-013 $27.24 358-183-014 $27.24 358-183-015 $27.24 358-183-016 $27.24 358-184-001 $27.24 358-184-002 $27.24 358-184-003 $27.24 358-185-001 $27.24 358-185-002 $27.24 358-185-003 $27.24 358-185-004 $27.24 358-185-005 $27.24 358-185-006 $27.24 358-191-002 $27.24 358-191-003 $27.24 358-191-004 $27.24 358-191-005 $27.24 358-191-006 $27.24 358-191-007 $27.24 358-191-008 $27.24 358-191-009 $27.24 358-191-010 $27.24 358-191-011 $27.24 358-191-012 $27.24 358-191-013 $27.24 358-191-014 $27.24 358-191-015 $27.24 358-191-016 $27.24 358-191-017 $27.24 358-191-018 $27.24 358-191-019 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-191-020 $27.24 358-191-021 $27.24 358-191-022 $27.24 358-191-023 $27.24 358-191-024 $27.24 358-191-025 $27.24 358-191-026 $27.24 358-191-027 $27.24 358-191-028 $27.24 358-191-029 $27.24 358-191-030 $27.24 358-191-031 $27.24 358-191-032 $27.24 358-191-033 $27.24 358-191-034 $27.24 358-191-035 $27.24 358-191-036 $27.24 358-191-037 $27.24 358-201-001 $27.24 358-201-002 $27.24 358-201-003 $27.24 358-201-004 $27.24 358-201-005 $27.24 358-201-006 $27.24 358-201-007 $27.24 358-201-008 $27.24 358-201-009 $27.24 358-201-010 $27.24 358-201-011 $27.24 358-201-012 $27.24 358-202-001 $27.24 358-202-002 $27.24 358-202-003 $27.24 358-202-004 $27.24 358-202-005 $27.24 358-202-006 $27.24 358-202-007 $27.24 358-202-008 $27.24 358-202-009 $27.24 358-202-010 $27.24 358-202-011 $27.24 358-202-012 $27.24 358-202-013 $27.24 358-202-014 $27.24 358-202-015 $27.24 358-202-016 $27.24 358-202-017 $27.24 358-202-018 $27.24 358-202-019 $27.24 358-202-020 $27.24 358-202-021 $27.24 358-202-022 $27.24 358-203-001 $27.24 358-203-002 $27.24 358-203-003 $27.24 358-203-004 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-203-005 $27.24 358-203-006 $27.24 358-203-007 $27.24 358-203-008 $27.24 358-203-009 $27.24 358-203-010 $27.24 358-203-011 $27.24 358-203-012 $27.24 358-204-001 $27.24 358-204-002 $27.24 358-204-003 $27.24 358-204-004 $27.24 358-204-005 $27.24 358-204-006 $27.24 358-204-007 $27.24 358-204-008 $27.24 358-204-009 $27.24 358-204-010 $27.24 358-204-011 $27.24 358-204-012 $27.24 358-204-013 $27.24 358-204-014 $27.24 358-204-015 $27.24 358-204-016 $27.24 358-204-017 $27.24 358-204-018 $27.24 358-204-019 $27.24 358-204-020 $27.24 358-204-021 $27.24 358-204-022 $27.24 358-211-001 $27.24 358-211-002 $27.24 358-211-003 $27.24 358-211-004 $27.24 358-211-005 $27.24 358-211-006 $27.24 358-211-007 $27.24 358-211-008 $27.24 358-211-009 $27.24 358-211-010 $27.24 358-211-011 $27.24 358-211-012 $27.24 358-211-013 $27.24 358-211-014 $27.24 358-211-015 $27.24 358-211-016 $27.24 358-211-017 $27.24 358-211-018 $27.24 358-211-019 $27.24 358-211-020 $27.24 358-211-021 $27.24 358-211-022 $27.24 358-211-023 $27.24 358-211-024 $27.24 358-211-025 $27.24 358-211-026 $27.24 71 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-211-027 $27.24 358-211-028 $27.24 358-211-029 $27.24 358-212-001 $27.24 358-212-002 $27.24 358-212-003 $27.24 358-212-004 $27.24 358-212-005 $27.24 358-212-006 $27.24 358-212-007 $27.24 358-212-008 $27.24 358-212-009 $27.24 358-212-010 $27.24 358-212-011 $27.24 358-212-012 $27.24 358-212-013 $27.24 358-212-014 $27.24 358-212-015 $27.24 358-212-016 $27.24 358-212-017 $27.24 358-212-018 $27.24 358-212-019 $27.24 358-212-020 $27.24 358-212-021 $27.24 358-212-022 $27.24 358-212-023 $27.24 358-212-024 $27.24 358-212-025 $27.24 358-212-026 $27.24 358-212-027 $27.24 358-212-028 $27.24 358-212-029 $27.24 358-212-030 $27.24 358-212-031 $27.24 358-212-032 $27.24 358-212-033 $27.24 358-213-001 $27.24 358-213-002 $27.24 358-213-003 $27.24 358-213-004 $27.24 358-213-005 $27.24 358-213-006 $27.24 358-213-007 $27.24 358-213-008 $27.24 358-213-009 $27.24 358-213-010 $27.24 358-213-011 $27.24 358-213-012 $27.24 358-213-013 $27.24 358-221-001 $27.24 358-221-002 $27.24 358-221-003 $27.24 358-221-004 $27.24 358-221-005 $27.24 358-221-006 $27.24 358-221-007 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-221-008 $27.24 358-221-009 $27.24 358-221-010 $27.24 358-221-011 $27.24 358-222-001 $27.24 358-222-002 $27.24 358-222-003 $27.24 358-223-001 $27.24 358-223-002 $27.24 358-223-003 $27.24 358-223-004 $27.24 358-223-005 $27.24 358-223-006 $27.24 358-223-007 $27.24 358-223-008 $27.24 358-223-009 $27.24 358-223-010 $27.24 358-223-011 $27.24 358-223-012 $27.24 358-223-013 $27.24 358-223-014 $27.24 358-223-015 $27.24 358-223-016 $27.24 358-231-001 $27.24 358-231-002 $27.24 358-231-003 $27.24 358-231-004 $27.24 358-231-005 $27.24 358-231-006 $27.24 358-231-007 $27.24 358-231-008 $27.24 358-231-009 $27.24 358-231-010 $27.24 358-232-001 $27.24 358-232-002 $27.24 358-232-003 $27.24 358-232-004 $27.24 358-232-005 $27.24 358-232-006 $27.24 358-233-001 $27.24 358-233-002 $27.24 358-233-003 $27.24 358-233-004 $27.24 358-233-005 $27.24 358-233-006 $27.24 358-233-007 $27.24 358-233-008 $27.24 358-233-009 $27.24 358-233-010 $27.24 358-234-001 $27.24 358-234-002 $27.24 358-234-003 $27.24 358-234-004 $27.24 358-234-005 $27.24 358-234-006 $27.24 358-234-007 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-234-008 $27.24 358-234-009 $27.24 358-234-010 $27.24 358-234-011 $27.24 358-234-012 $27.24 358-234-013 $27.24 358-234-014 $27.24 358-234-015 $27.24 358-234-016 $27.24 358-234-017 $27.24 358-235-001 $27.24 358-235-002 $27.24 358-235-003 $27.24 358-235-004 $27.24 358-235-005 $27.24 358-235-006 $27.24 358-235-007 $27.24 358-235-008 $27.24 358-235-009 $27.24 358-235-010 $27.24 358-235-011 $27.24 358-235-012 $27.24 358-241-001 $27.24 358-241-002 $27.24 358-241-003 $27.24 358-241-004 $27.24 358-241-005 $27.24 358-241-006 $27.24 358-241-007 $27.24 358-241-008 $27.24 358-241-009 $27.24 358-241-010 $27.24 358-241-011 $27.24 358-241-012 $27.24 358-241-013 $27.24 358-241-014 $27.24 358-241-015 $27.24 358-241-016 $27.24 358-241-017 $27.24 358-242-001 $27.24 358-242-002 $27.24 358-242-003 $27.24 358-242-004 $27.24 358-242-005 $27.24 358-242-006 $27.24 358-242-007 $27.24 358-242-008 $27.24 358-242-009 $27.24 358-242-010 $27.24 358-242-011 $27.24 358-242-012 $27.24 358-242-013 $27.24 358-242-014 $27.24 358-242-015 $27.24 358-251-001 $27.24 358-251-002 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-251-003 $27.24 358-251-004 $27.24 358-251-005 $27.24 358-251-006 $27.24 358-252-001 $27.24 358-252-002 $27.24 358-252-003 $27.24 358-252-004 $27.24 358-252-005 $27.24 358-252-006 $27.24 358-252-007 $27.24 358-252-008 $27.24 358-252-009 $27.24 358-252-010 $27.24 358-252-011 $27.24 358-252-012 $27.24 358-253-001 $27.24 358-253-002 $27.24 358-253-003 $27.24 358-253-004 $27.24 358-253-005 $27.24 358-253-006 $27.24 358-253-007 $27.24 358-253-008 $27.24 358-253-009 $27.24 358-253-010 $27.24 358-253-011 $27.24 358-254-001 $27.24 358-254-002 $27.24 358-254-003 $27.24 358-254-004 $27.24 358-254-005 $27.24 358-254-006 $27.24 358-254-007 $27.24 358-254-008 $27.24 358-254-009 $27.24 358-254-010 $27.24 358-254-011 $27.24 358-254-012 $27.24 358-254-013 $27.24 358-254-014 $27.24 358-254-015 $27.24 358-261-001 $27.24 358-261-002 $27.24 358-261-003 $27.24 358-261-004 $27.24 358-261-005 $27.24 358-261-006 $27.24 358-261-007 $27.24 358-261-008 $27.24 358-261-009 $27.24 358-261-010 $27.24 358-261-011 $27.24 358-261-012 $27.24 358-261-013 $27.24 358-261-014 $27.24 72 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-261-015 $27.24 358-261-016 $27.24 358-261-017 $27.24 358-261-018 $27.24 358-261-019 $27.24 358-261-020 $27.24 358-261-021 $27.24 358-261-022 $27.24 358-262-001 $27.24 358-262-002 $27.24 358-262-003 $27.24 358-262-004 $27.24 358-262-005 $27.24 358-262-006 $27.24 358-262-007 $27.24 358-263-001 $27.24 358-263-002 $27.24 358-264-001 $27.24 358-264-002 $27.24 358-264-003 $27.24 358-264-004 $27.24 358-264-005 $27.24 358-264-006 $27.24 358-264-007 $27.24 358-264-008 $27.24 358-264-009 $27.24 358-264-010 $27.24 358-264-011 $27.24 358-264-012 $27.24 358-264-013 $27.24 358-264-014 $27.24 358-264-015 $27.24 358-264-016 $27.24 358-264-017 $27.24 358-264-018 $27.24 358-264-019 $27.24 358-264-020 $27.24 358-264-021 $27.24 358-264-022 $27.24 358-264-023 $27.24 358-264-024 $27.24 358-264-025 $27.24 358-264-026 $27.24 358-264-027 $27.24 358-264-028 $27.24 358-265-001 $27.24 358-265-002 $27.24 358-265-003 $27.24 358-265-004 $27.24 358-265-005 $27.24 358-265-006 $27.24 358-265-007 $27.24 358-265-008 $27.24 358-265-009 $27.24 358-265-010 $27.24 358-271-001 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-271-002 $27.24 358-271-003 $27.24 358-271-004 $27.24 358-271-005 $27.24 358-271-006 $27.24 358-271-007 $27.24 358-271-008 $27.24 358-271-009 $27.24 358-271-010 $27.24 358-271-011 $27.24 358-271-012 $27.24 358-271-013 $27.24 358-271-014 $27.24 358-271-015 $27.24 358-271-016 $27.24 358-271-017 $27.24 358-271-018 $27.24 358-271-019 $27.24 358-271-020 $27.24 358-271-021 $27.24 358-271-022 $27.24 358-271-023 $27.24 358-271-024 $27.24 358-271-025 $27.24 358-271-026 $27.24 358-271-027 $27.24 358-271-028 $27.24 358-271-029 $27.24 358-271-030 $27.24 358-271-031 $27.24 358-271-032 $27.24 358-271-033 $27.24 358-271-034 $27.24 358-271-035 $27.24 358-271-036 $27.24 358-271-037 $27.24 358-271-038 $27.24 358-271-039 $27.24 358-271-040 $27.24 358-271-041 $27.24 358-271-042 $27.24 358-271-043 $27.24 358-271-044 $27.24 358-272-001 $27.24 358-272-002 $27.24 358-272-003 $27.24 358-272-004 $27.24 358-272-005 $27.24 358-291-001 $27.24 358-291-002 $27.24 358-291-003 $27.24 358-291-004 $27.24 358-291-005 $27.24 358-291-006 $27.24 358-291-007 $27.24 358-291-008 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-291-009 $27.24 358-291-010 $27.24 358-291-011 $27.24 358-291-012 $27.24 358-291-013 $27.24 358-291-014 $27.24 358-291-015 $27.24 358-291-016 $27.24 358-291-017 $27.24 358-291-018 $27.24 358-291-019 $27.24 358-292-001 $27.24 358-292-002 $27.24 358-292-003 $27.24 358-292-004 $27.24 358-292-005 $27.24 358-292-006 $27.24 358-292-007 $27.24 358-293-001 $27.24 358-293-002 $27.24 358-293-003 $27.24 358-293-004 $27.24 358-293-005 $27.24 358-293-006 $27.24 358-293-007 $27.24 358-293-008 $27.24 358-293-009 $27.24 358-293-010 $27.24 358-293-011 $27.24 358-293-012 $27.24 358-293-013 $27.24 358-293-014 $27.24 358-293-015 $27.24 358-293-016 $27.24 358-293-017 $27.24 358-293-018 $27.24 358-293-019 $27.24 358-293-020 $27.24 358-293-021 $27.24 358-293-022 $27.24 358-293-023 $27.24 358-293-024 $27.24 358-293-025 $27.24 358-293-026 $27.24 358-293-027 $27.24 358-293-028 $27.24 358-293-029 $27.24 358-293-030 $27.24 358-293-031 $27.24 358-293-032 $27.24 358-293-033 $27.24 358-293-034 $27.24 358-293-035 $27.24 358-293-036 $27.24 358-293-037 $27.24 358-293-038 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-293-039 $27.24 358-293-040 $27.24 358-293-041 $27.24 358-293-042 $27.24 358-293-043 $27.24 358-293-044 $27.24 358-302-001 $27.24 358-302-002 $27.24 358-302-003 $27.24 358-302-004 $27.24 358-302-005 $27.24 358-302-006 $27.24 358-302-007 $27.24 358-302-008 $27.24 358-302-009 $27.24 358-302-010 $27.24 358-302-011 $27.24 358-302-014 $27.24 358-302-015 $27.24 358-302-016 $27.24 358-302-017 $27.24 358-302-018 $27.24 358-302-019 $27.24 358-302-020 $27.24 358-302-021 $27.24 358-302-022 $27.24 358-303-001 $27.24 358-303-002 $27.24 358-303-003 $27.24 358-303-004 $27.24 358-310-001 $27.24 358-310-002 $27.24 358-310-003 $27.24 358-310-004 $27.24 358-310-005 $27.24 358-310-006 $27.24 358-310-007 $27.24 358-310-008 $27.24 358-310-009 $27.24 358-310-010 $27.24 358-310-011 $27.24 358-310-012 $27.24 358-310-013 $27.24 358-310-014 $27.24 358-310-015 $27.24 358-311-001 $27.24 358-311-002 $27.24 358-311-003 $27.24 358-311-004 $27.24 358-311-005 $27.24 358-311-006 $27.24 358-311-007 $27.24 358-311-008 $27.24 358-311-009 $27.24 358-311-010 $27.24 358-311-011 $27.24 73 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 38 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2854 LT LEVY CODE: Rodeo Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-311-012 $27.24 358-311-013 $27.24 358-311-014 $27.24 358-311-015 $27.24 358-311-016 $27.24 358-311-017 $27.24 358-311-018 $27.24 358-311-019 $27.24 358-311-020 $27.24 358-311-021 $27.24 358-311-022 $27.24 358-311-023 $27.24 358-311-024 $27.24 358-311-025 $27.24 358-311-026 $27.24 358-311-027 $27.24 358-311-028 $27.24 358-311-029 $27.24 358-311-030 $27.24 358-311-031 $27.24 358-311-032 $27.24 358-311-033 $27.24 358-311-034 $27.24 358-311-035 $27.24 358-311-036 $27.24 358-311-037 $27.24 358-311-038 $27.24 358-311-039 $27.24 358-311-040 $27.24 358-311-041 $27.24 358-311-042 $27.24 358-311-043 $27.24 358-311-044 $27.24 358-311-045 $27.24 358-311-046 $27.24 358-311-047 $27.24 358-311-048 $27.24 358-311-049 $27.24 358-311-050 $27.24 358-311-051 $27.24 358-311-052 $27.24 358-311-053 $27.24 358-311-054 $27.24 358-311-055 $27.24 358-311-056 $27.24 358-311-057 $27.24 358-311-059 $27.24 358-311-060 $27.24 358-311-061 $27.24 358-311-062 $27.24 358-311-063 $27.24 358-311-064 $27.24 358-311-065 $27.24 358-311-066 $27.24 358-311-067 $27.24 358-311-068 $27.24 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 358-311-069 $27.24 358-311-070 $27.24 358-311-071 $27.24 358-311-072 $27.24 358-311-073 $27.24 358-311-074 $27.24 358-311-075 $27.24 358-311-076 $27.24 358-311-077 $27.24 358-311-078 $27.24 358-312-001 $27.24 358-312-002 $27.24 358-312-003 $27.24 358-312-004 $27.24 358-312-005 $27.24 358-312-006 $27.24 358-312-007 $27.24 358-312-008 $27.24 358-312-009 $27.24 358-312-010 $27.24 358-312-011 $27.24 358-312-012 $27.24 358-312-014 $27.24 358-312-015 $27.24 358-312-016 $27.24 358-312-017 $27.24 358-312-018 $27.24 358-312-019 $27.24 358-312-020 $27.24 358-312-021 $27.24 358-312-022 $27.24 358-312-023 $27.24 358-312-024 $27.24 358-312-025 $27.24 358-312-026 $27.24 358-312-027 $27.24 358-312-028 $27.24 358-312-029 $27.24 358-312-030 $27.24 358-312-031 $27.24 358-312-032 $27.24 358-312-033 $27.24 358-312-034 $27.24 358-312-035 $27.24 358-312-036 $27.24 2565Total Parcels: $84,831.34 Total Assessment: 74 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 42 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2867 L2 LEVY CODE: California Skyline - Bay Point Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-170-001 $210.00 099-170-002 $210.00 099-170-003 $210.00 099-170-004 $210.00 099-170-005 $210.00 099-170-006 $210.00 099-170-007 $210.00 099-170-008 $210.00 099-170-009 $210.00 099-170-010 $210.00 099-170-011 $210.00 099-170-012 $210.00 099-170-013 $210.00 099-170-014 $210.00 099-170-015 $210.00 099-170-016 $210.00 099-170-017 $210.00 099-170-018 $210.00 099-170-019 $210.00 099-170-020 $210.00 099-170-021 $210.00 099-170-022 $210.00 099-170-023 $210.00 099-170-024 $210.00 099-170-025 $210.00 099-170-026 $210.00 099-170-027 $210.00 099-170-028 $210.00 099-170-029 $210.00 099-170-030 $210.00 099-170-031 $210.00 099-170-032 $210.00 099-170-033 $210.00 099-170-034 $210.00 099-170-035 $210.00 099-170-036 $210.00 099-170-037 $210.00 099-170-038 $210.00 099-170-039 $210.00 099-170-040 $210.00 099-170-041 $210.00 099-170-042 $210.00 099-170-043 $210.00 099-170-044 $210.00 099-170-045 $210.00 099-170-046 $210.00 099-170-047 $210.00 099-170-048 $210.00 099-170-049 $210.00 099-170-050 $210.00 099-170-051 $210.00 099-170-052 $210.00 099-170-053 $210.00 099-170-054 $210.00 099-170-055 $210.00 099-170-056 $210.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-170-057 $210.00 099-170-058 $210.00 099-170-059 $210.00 099-170-060 $210.00 099-170-061 $210.00 099-170-062 $210.00 099-170-063 $210.00 099-170-066 $210.00 099-170-067 $210.00 099-170-068 $210.00 099-170-069 $210.00 099-170-070 $210.00 099-170-071 $210.00 099-170-072 $210.00 099-170-073 $210.00 099-170-074 $210.00 099-170-075 $210.00 099-170-076 $210.00 099-180-001 $210.00 099-180-002 $210.00 099-180-003 $210.00 099-180-004 $210.00 099-180-005 $210.00 099-180-006 $210.00 099-180-007 $210.00 099-180-008 $210.00 099-180-009 $210.00 099-180-010 $210.00 099-180-011 $210.00 099-180-012 $210.00 099-180-013 $210.00 099-180-014 $210.00 099-180-015 $210.00 099-180-016 $210.00 099-180-017 $210.00 099-180-018 $210.00 099-180-019 $210.00 099-180-020 $210.00 099-180-021 $210.00 099-180-022 $210.00 099-180-023 $210.00 099-180-024 $210.00 099-180-025 $210.00 099-180-026 $210.00 099-180-027 $210.00 099-180-028 $210.00 099-180-029 $210.00 099-180-030 $210.00 099-180-031 $210.00 099-180-032 $210.00 099-180-033 $210.00 099-180-034 $210.00 099-180-035 $210.00 099-180-036 $210.00 099-180-037 $210.00 099-180-038 $210.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-180-039 $210.00 099-180-040 $210.00 099-180-041 $210.00 099-180-042 $210.00 099-180-043 $210.00 099-180-044 $210.00 099-180-045 $210.00 099-180-046 $210.00 099-180-047 $210.00 099-180-048 $210.00 099-180-049 $210.00 099-180-050 $210.00 099-180-051 $210.00 099-180-052 $210.00 099-180-053 $210.00 099-180-054 $210.00 099-180-055 $210.00 099-180-056 $210.00 099-180-057 $210.00 099-180-058 $210.00 099-180-059 $210.00 099-180-060 $210.00 099-180-061 $210.00 099-180-062 $210.00 099-180-063 $210.00 099-180-064 $210.00 099-180-065 $210.00 099-180-066 $210.00 099-180-067 $210.00 099-180-068 $210.00 099-180-069 $210.00 099-180-070 $210.00 099-180-071 $210.00 099-180-072 $210.00 099-180-073 $210.00 099-180-074 $210.00 099-180-075 $210.00 099-180-076 $210.00 099-180-077 $210.00 099-180-078 $210.00 099-180-079 $210.00 099-180-080 $210.00 099-180-081 $210.00 099-180-082 $210.00 099-180-083 $210.00 099-180-084 $210.00 099-180-085 $210.00 099-180-086 $210.00 099-180-087 $210.00 099-180-088 $210.00 099-180-089 $210.00 099-180-090 $210.00 099-180-091 $210.00 099-180-092 $210.00 099-180-093 $210.00 099-180-094 $210.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-190-001 $210.00 099-190-002 $210.00 099-190-003 $210.00 099-190-004 $210.00 099-190-005 $210.00 099-190-006 $210.00 099-190-007 $210.00 099-190-008 $210.00 099-190-009 $210.00 099-190-010 $210.00 099-190-011 $210.00 099-190-012 $210.00 099-190-013 $210.00 099-190-014 $210.00 099-190-015 $210.00 099-190-016 $210.00 099-190-017 $210.00 099-190-018 $210.00 099-190-019 $210.00 099-190-020 $210.00 099-190-021 $210.00 099-190-022 $210.00 099-190-023 $210.00 099-190-024 $210.00 099-190-025 $210.00 099-190-026 $210.00 099-190-027 $210.00 099-190-028 $210.00 099-190-029 $210.00 099-190-030 $210.00 099-190-031 $210.00 099-190-032 $210.00 099-190-033 $210.00 099-190-034 $210.00 099-190-035 $210.00 099-190-036 $210.00 099-190-037 $210.00 099-190-038 $210.00 099-190-039 $210.00 099-190-040 $210.00 099-190-041 $210.00 099-190-042 $210.00 099-190-043 $210.00 099-190-044 $210.00 099-190-045 $210.00 099-190-046 $210.00 099-190-047 $210.00 099-190-048 $210.00 099-190-049 $210.00 099-190-050 $210.00 099-190-051 $210.00 099-190-052 $210.00 099-190-053 $210.00 099-190-054 $210.00 099-190-055 $210.00 099-190-056 $210.00 75 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 42 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2867 L2 LEVY CODE: California Skyline - Bay Point Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-190-057 $210.00 099-190-058 $210.00 099-190-059 $210.00 099-190-060 $210.00 099-190-061 $210.00 099-190-062 $210.00 099-190-063 $210.00 099-190-064 $210.00 099-190-065 $210.00 099-190-066 $210.00 099-190-067 $210.00 099-190-068 $210.00 099-190-069 $210.00 099-190-070 $210.00 099-190-071 $210.00 099-190-072 $210.00 099-190-073 $210.00 099-190-074 $210.00 099-190-075 $210.00 099-190-076 $210.00 099-190-077 $210.00 099-190-078 $210.00 099-190-079 $210.00 099-190-080 $210.00 099-190-081 $210.00 099-190-082 $210.00 099-190-083 $210.00 099-190-084 $210.00 099-190-085 $210.00 099-190-086 $210.00 099-190-087 $210.00 099-190-088 $210.00 099-190-089 $210.00 099-190-090 $210.00 099-190-091 $210.00 099-190-092 $210.00 099-190-093 $210.00 099-190-094 $210.00 099-190-095 $210.00 099-190-096 $210.00 099-190-097 $210.00 099-190-098 $210.00 099-190-099 $210.00 099-190-100 $210.00 099-190-101 $210.00 099-190-102 $210.00 099-190-103 $210.00 099-190-104 $210.00 099-190-105 $210.00 099-190-106 $210.00 099-190-107 $210.00 099-190-108 $210.00 099-190-109 $210.00 099-190-110 $210.00 099-190-111 $210.00 099-190-112 $210.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-190-113 $210.00 099-190-114 $210.00 099-190-115 $210.00 099-190-116 $210.00 099-190-117 $210.00 099-190-118 $210.00 099-190-119 $210.00 099-190-120 $210.00 099-190-121 $210.00 099-190-122 $210.00 099-190-123 $210.00 099-190-124 $210.00 099-190-125 $210.00 099-190-126 $210.00 099-190-127 $210.00 099-190-128 $210.00 099-190-129 $210.00 099-200-001 $210.00 099-200-002 $210.00 099-200-003 $210.00 099-200-004 $210.00 099-200-005 $210.00 099-200-006 $210.00 099-200-007 $210.00 099-200-008 $210.00 099-200-009 $210.00 099-200-010 $210.00 099-200-011 $210.00 099-200-012 $210.00 099-200-013 $210.00 099-200-014 $210.00 099-200-015 $210.00 099-200-016 $210.00 099-200-017 $210.00 099-200-018 $210.00 099-200-019 $210.00 099-200-020 $210.00 099-200-021 $210.00 099-200-022 $210.00 099-200-023 $210.00 099-200-024 $210.00 099-200-025 $210.00 099-200-026 $210.00 099-200-027 $210.00 099-200-028 $210.00 099-200-029 $210.00 099-200-030 $210.00 099-200-031 $210.00 099-200-032 $210.00 099-200-033 $210.00 099-200-034 $210.00 099-200-035 $210.00 099-200-036 $210.00 099-200-037 $210.00 099-200-038 $210.00 099-200-039 $210.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 099-200-040 $210.00 099-200-041 $210.00 099-200-043 $210.00 099-200-044 $210.00 099-200-045 $210.00 099-200-046 $210.00 099-200-047 $210.00 343Total Parcels: $72,030.00 Total Assessment: 76 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 45 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2869 L4 LEVY CODE: Alamo Villas Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 197-430-001 $120.00 197-430-002 $120.00 197-430-003 $120.00 197-430-004 $120.00 197-430-005 $120.00 197-430-006 $120.00 197-430-007 $120.00 197-430-008 $120.00 197-430-009 $120.00 197-430-010 $120.00 10Total Parcels: $1,200.00 Total Assessment: 77 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 48 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2872 L7 LEVY CODE: Mrack Road - Camino Tassajara Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-080-035 $490.00 220-080-037 $490.00 220-080-038 $490.00 220-080-040 $490.00 220-391-008 $490.00 220-391-009 $490.00 220-391-010 $490.00 220-391-011 $490.00 220-391-012 $490.00 220-391-013 $490.00 220-391-014 $490.00 220-391-015 $490.00 220-391-016 $490.00 220-391-018 $490.00 220-391-019 $490.00 220-391-020 $490.00 220-391-021 $490.00 220-391-022 $490.00 220-391-023 $490.00 220-391-024 $490.00 220-391-025 $490.00 220-391-026 $490.00 220-391-027 $490.00 220-391-028 $490.00 220-391-029 $490.00 220-391-030 $490.00 220-391-031 $490.00 220-391-032 $490.00 220-391-033 $490.00 220-391-034 $490.00 220-391-035 $490.00 220-391-036 $490.00 220-391-037 $490.00 220-391-038 $490.00 220-391-039 $490.00 220-391-040 $490.00 220-391-041 $490.00 220-391-042 $490.00 220-391-043 $490.00 220-391-045 $490.00 220-391-046 $490.00 220-391-047 $490.00 220-391-048 $490.00 220-391-049 $490.00 220-391-050 $490.00 220-391-051 $490.00 220-391-052 $490.00 220-401-001 $490.00 220-401-002 $490.00 220-401-003 $490.00 220-401-004 $490.00 220-401-005 $490.00 220-401-006 $490.00 220-401-007 $490.00 220-401-008 $490.00 220-401-009 $490.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 220-401-010 $490.00 220-401-011 $490.00 220-401-012 $490.00 220-401-013 $490.00 220-401-014 $490.00 220-401-015 $490.00 220-401-016 $490.00 220-401-017 $490.00 220-401-018 $490.00 220-401-019 $490.00 220-401-020 $490.00 220-401-021 $490.00 220-401-022 $490.00 220-401-023 $490.00 220-401-024 $490.00 220-401-025 $490.00 72Total Parcels: $35,280.00 Total Assessment: 78 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 54 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2876 M3 LEVY CODE: Alamo Country - Alamo Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-560-003 $414.52 187-560-004 $414.52 187-560-005 $414.52 187-560-006 $414.52 187-560-007 $414.52 187-560-008 $414.52 187-560-009 $414.52 187-560-010 $414.52 187-560-011 $414.52 187-560-012 $414.52 187-560-013 $414.52 187-560-014 $414.52 187-560-015 $414.52 187-560-016 $414.52 187-560-017 $414.52 187-560-019 $414.52 187-560-020 $414.52 187-570-001 $414.52 187-570-002 $414.52 187-570-003 $414.52 187-570-004 $414.52 187-570-005 $414.52 187-570-006 $414.52 187-570-007 $414.52 187-570-008 $414.52 187-580-001 $414.52 187-580-002 $414.52 187-580-003 $414.52 187-580-004 $414.52 187-580-005 $414.52 187-580-006 $414.52 187-580-007 $414.52 187-580-008 $414.52 187-580-009 $414.52 187-580-010 $414.52 187-580-011 $414.52 187-580-012 $414.52 187-580-013 $414.52 187-580-014 $414.52 187-580-015 $414.52 187-580-016 $414.52 187-580-017 $414.52 187-580-018 $414.52 187-580-019 $414.52 187-580-020 $414.52 187-580-021 $414.52 187-580-022 $414.52 187-580-023 $414.52 187-580-024 $414.52 187-580-025 $414.52 187-580-026 $414.52 187-580-027 $414.52 187-580-028 $414.52 187-580-029 $414.52 187-580-030 $414.52 187-580-031 $414.52 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 187-580-032 $414.52 187-580-033 $414.52 187-580-034 $414.52 187-580-035 $414.52 187-590-001 $414.52 187-590-002 $414.52 187-590-003 $414.52 187-590-004 $414.52 187-590-005 $414.52 187-590-006 $414.52 187-590-007 $414.52 187-590-008 $414.52 187-590-009 $414.52 187-590-010 $414.52 187-590-011 $414.52 187-590-012 $414.52 187-590-013 $414.52 187-590-014 $414.52 187-590-015 $414.52 187-590-016 $414.52 187-590-017 $414.52 187-590-018 $414.52 187-590-021 $414.52 187-590-022 $414.52 187-590-023 $414.52 187-590-024 $414.52 187-590-025 $414.52 187-590-026 $414.52 187-590-027 $414.52 187-590-028 $414.52 187-590-029 $414.52 187-590-030 $414.52 187-590-031 $414.52 187-590-032 $414.52 187-590-033 $414.52 187-590-034 $414.52 187-590-035 $414.52 93Total Parcels: $38,550.36 Total Assessment: 79 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 57 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2877 M4 LEVY CODE: Pacific Waterways - Discovery Bay Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-291-002 $231.00 011-291-003 $231.00 011-291-004 $231.00 011-291-005 $231.00 011-291-006 $231.00 011-291-007 $231.00 011-291-008 $231.00 011-291-009 $231.00 011-291-010 $231.00 011-291-011 $231.00 011-291-012 $231.00 011-291-013 $231.00 011-291-014 $231.00 011-291-015 $231.00 011-291-017 $231.00 011-291-018 $231.00 011-291-019 $231.00 011-291-020 $231.00 011-291-021 $231.00 011-291-022 $231.00 011-291-023 $231.00 011-291-024 $231.00 011-291-025 $231.00 011-291-026 $231.00 011-291-027 $231.00 011-291-028 $231.00 011-291-029 $231.00 011-291-030 $231.00 011-291-031 $231.00 011-291-032 $231.00 011-291-033 $231.00 011-291-034 $231.00 011-291-035 $231.00 011-291-036 $231.00 011-291-037 $231.00 011-291-038 $231.00 011-291-039 $231.00 011-291-040 $231.00 011-291-041 $231.00 011-291-042 $231.00 011-291-043 $231.00 011-291-044 $231.00 011-291-045 $231.00 011-291-046 $231.00 011-291-047 $231.00 011-291-048 $231.00 011-291-049 $231.00 011-291-050 $231.00 011-291-051 $231.00 011-291-052 $231.00 011-291-053 $231.00 011-291-054 $231.00 011-291-055 $231.00 011-291-056 $231.00 011-291-057 $231.00 011-291-058 $231.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-291-059 $231.00 011-291-060 $231.00 011-291-061 $231.00 011-291-062 $231.00 011-291-063 $231.00 011-291-064 $231.00 011-291-066 $231.00 011-302-001 $231.00 011-302-002 $231.00 011-302-003 $231.00 011-302-004 $231.00 011-302-005 $231.00 011-302-006 $231.00 011-302-007 $231.00 011-302-008 $231.00 011-302-009 $231.00 011-302-010 $231.00 011-302-011 $231.00 011-302-012 $231.00 011-302-013 $231.00 011-302-014 $231.00 011-302-015 $231.00 011-302-016 $231.00 011-302-017 $231.00 011-302-018 $231.00 011-302-019 $231.00 011-302-020 $231.00 011-302-021 $231.00 011-302-022 $231.00 011-302-023 $231.00 011-302-024 $231.00 011-302-025 $231.00 011-302-026 $231.00 011-302-027 $231.00 011-302-028 $231.00 011-302-029 $231.00 011-302-030 $231.00 011-302-031 $231.00 011-302-032 $231.00 011-302-033 $231.00 011-302-034 $231.00 011-302-035 $231.00 011-302-036 $231.00 011-302-037 $231.00 011-302-038 $231.00 011-302-039 $231.00 011-302-040 $231.00 011-302-041 $231.00 011-316-001 $231.00 011-316-002 $231.00 011-316-003 $231.00 011-316-004 $231.00 011-316-005 $231.00 011-316-006 $231.00 011-316-007 $231.00 011-316-008 $231.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-316-009 $231.00 011-316-010 $231.00 011-316-011 $231.00 011-316-012 $231.00 011-316-013 $231.00 011-316-014 $231.00 011-316-015 $231.00 011-316-016 $231.00 011-316-017 $231.00 011-316-018 $231.00 011-316-019 $231.00 011-316-020 $231.00 011-316-021 $231.00 011-316-022 $231.00 011-316-023 $231.00 011-316-024 $231.00 011-316-025 $231.00 011-316-026 $231.00 011-316-027 $231.00 011-316-028 $231.00 011-316-029 $231.00 011-316-030 $231.00 011-316-031 $231.00 011-316-032 $231.00 011-316-033 $231.00 011-316-034 $231.00 011-316-035 $231.00 011-316-036 $231.00 011-316-037 $231.00 011-316-038 $231.00 011-316-039 $231.00 011-316-040 $231.00 011-316-041 $231.00 011-316-042 $231.00 011-323-001 $231.00 011-323-002 $231.00 011-323-003 $231.00 011-323-004 $231.00 011-323-005 $231.00 011-323-006 $231.00 011-323-007 $231.00 011-323-008 $231.00 011-323-009 $231.00 011-323-010 $231.00 011-323-011 $231.00 011-323-012 $231.00 011-323-013 $231.00 011-323-014 $231.00 011-323-015 $231.00 011-323-016 $231.00 011-323-017 $231.00 011-323-018 $231.00 011-323-019 $231.00 011-323-020 $231.00 011-323-021 $231.00 011-323-022 $231.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-323-023 $231.00 011-323-024 $231.00 011-323-025 $231.00 011-323-026 $231.00 011-323-027 $231.00 011-323-028 $231.00 011-323-029 $231.00 011-323-030 $231.00 011-323-031 $231.00 011-323-032 $231.00 011-323-033 $231.00 011-323-034 $231.00 011-323-035 $231.00 011-323-036 $231.00 011-323-037 $231.00 011-323-038 $231.00 011-323-039 $231.00 011-323-040 $231.00 011-323-041 $231.00 011-323-042 $231.00 011-323-043 $231.00 011-323-044 $231.00 011-323-045 $231.00 011-323-046 $231.00 011-323-047 $231.00 011-323-048 $231.00 011-323-049 $231.00 011-323-050 $231.00 011-323-051 $231.00 011-323-052 $231.00 011-323-053 $231.00 011-323-054 $231.00 011-323-055 $231.00 011-323-056 $231.00 011-323-057 $231.00 011-323-058 $231.00 011-323-059 $231.00 011-323-060 $231.00 011-323-061 $231.00 011-323-062 $231.00 011-323-063 $231.00 011-323-064 $231.00 011-331-001 $231.00 011-331-002 $231.00 011-331-003 $231.00 011-331-004 $231.00 011-331-005 $231.00 011-331-006 $231.00 011-331-007 $231.00 011-331-008 $231.00 011-331-009 $231.00 011-331-010 $231.00 011-331-011 $231.00 011-331-012 $231.00 011-331-013 $231.00 011-331-014 $231.00 80 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 57 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2877 M4 LEVY CODE: Pacific Waterways - Discovery Bay Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-331-015 $231.00 011-331-016 $231.00 011-331-017 $231.00 011-331-018 $231.00 011-331-019 $231.00 011-331-020 $231.00 011-331-021 $231.00 011-331-022 $231.00 011-331-023 $231.00 011-331-024 $231.00 011-331-025 $231.00 011-331-026 $231.00 011-331-027 $231.00 011-331-028 $231.00 011-331-029 $231.00 011-331-030 $231.00 011-331-031 $231.00 011-331-032 $231.00 011-331-033 $231.00 011-331-034 $231.00 011-331-035 $231.00 011-331-036 $231.00 011-331-037 $231.00 011-331-038 $231.00 011-331-039 $231.00 011-331-040 $231.00 011-331-041 $231.00 011-331-042 $231.00 011-331-043 $231.00 011-331-044 $231.00 011-331-045 $231.00 011-331-046 $231.00 011-331-047 $231.00 011-331-048 $231.00 011-331-049 $231.00 011-331-050 $231.00 011-331-051 $231.00 011-331-052 $231.00 011-331-053 $231.00 011-331-054 $231.00 011-331-055 $231.00 011-331-056 $231.00 011-331-057 $231.00 011-331-058 $231.00 011-331-059 $231.00 011-331-060 $231.00 011-331-061 $231.00 011-331-062 $231.00 011-331-063 $231.00 011-331-064 $231.00 011-331-065 $231.00 011-331-066 $231.00 011-331-067 $231.00 011-331-068 $231.00 011-331-069 $231.00 011-331-070 $231.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-331-071 $231.00 011-331-072 $231.00 011-331-073 $231.00 011-331-074 $231.00 011-331-075 $231.00 011-331-076 $231.00 011-331-077 $231.00 011-331-078 $231.00 011-331-079 $231.00 011-331-080 $231.00 011-331-081 $231.00 011-331-082 $231.00 011-331-083 $231.00 011-331-084 $231.00 011-331-085 $231.00 011-331-086 $231.00 011-331-087 $231.00 011-331-088 $231.00 011-331-089 $231.00 011-331-090 $231.00 011-331-091 $231.00 011-331-092 $231.00 011-331-093 $231.00 011-331-094 $231.00 011-331-095 $231.00 011-331-096 $231.00 011-331-097 $231.00 011-340-001 $231.00 011-340-002 $231.00 011-340-003 $231.00 011-340-004 $231.00 011-340-005 $231.00 011-340-006 $231.00 011-340-007 $231.00 011-340-008 $231.00 011-340-009 $231.00 011-340-010 $231.00 011-340-011 $231.00 011-340-012 $231.00 011-340-013 $231.00 011-340-014 $231.00 011-340-015 $231.00 011-340-016 $231.00 011-340-017 $231.00 011-340-018 $231.00 011-340-019 $231.00 011-340-020 $231.00 011-340-021 $231.00 011-340-022 $231.00 011-340-023 $231.00 011-340-024 $231.00 011-340-025 $231.00 011-340-026 $231.00 011-340-027 $231.00 011-340-028 $231.00 011-340-029 $231.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-340-030 $231.00 011-340-031 $231.00 011-340-032 $231.00 011-340-033 $231.00 011-340-034 $231.00 011-340-035 $231.00 011-340-036 $231.00 011-340-037 $231.00 011-340-038 $231.00 011-340-039 $231.00 011-340-040 $231.00 011-340-041 $231.00 011-340-042 $231.00 011-340-043 $231.00 011-340-044 $231.00 011-340-045 $231.00 011-340-046 $231.00 011-340-047 $231.00 011-340-048 $231.00 011-340-049 $231.00 011-340-050 $231.00 011-340-051 $231.00 011-340-052 $231.00 011-340-053 $231.00 011-340-054 $231.00 011-340-055 $231.00 011-340-056 $231.00 011-340-057 $231.00 011-340-058 $231.00 011-340-059 $231.00 011-340-060 $231.00 011-340-061 $231.00 011-340-062 $231.00 011-340-063 $231.00 011-340-064 $231.00 011-340-065 $231.00 011-340-069 $231.00 011-340-070 $231.00 011-340-071 $231.00 011-340-072 $231.00 011-340-073 $231.00 011-340-074 $231.00 011-340-075 $231.00 379Total Parcels: $87,549.00 Total Assessment: 81 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-350-007 $203.20 011-350-009 $960.00 011-360-001 $160.00 011-360-002 $160.00 011-360-003 $160.00 011-360-004 $160.00 011-360-005 $160.00 011-360-006 $160.00 011-360-007 $160.00 011-360-008 $160.00 011-360-009 $160.00 011-360-010 $160.00 011-360-011 $160.00 011-360-012 $160.00 011-360-013 $160.00 011-360-014 $160.00 011-360-015 $160.00 011-360-016 $160.00 011-360-017 $160.00 011-360-018 $160.00 011-360-019 $160.00 011-360-020 $160.00 011-360-021 $160.00 011-360-022 $160.00 011-360-023 $160.00 011-360-024 $160.00 011-360-025 $160.00 011-360-026 $160.00 011-360-027 $160.00 011-360-028 $160.00 011-360-029 $160.00 011-360-030 $160.00 011-360-031 $160.00 011-360-032 $160.00 011-360-033 $160.00 011-360-034 $160.00 011-360-035 $160.00 011-360-036 $160.00 011-360-037 $160.00 011-360-038 $160.00 011-360-039 $160.00 011-360-040 $160.00 011-360-041 $160.00 011-360-042 $160.00 011-360-043 $160.00 011-360-044 $160.00 011-360-045 $160.00 011-360-046 $160.00 011-360-047 $160.00 011-360-048 $160.00 011-360-049 $160.00 011-360-050 $160.00 011-360-051 $160.00 011-360-052 $160.00 011-360-053 $160.00 011-360-054 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-360-055 $160.00 011-360-056 $160.00 011-360-057 $160.00 011-370-001 $160.00 011-370-002 $160.00 011-370-003 $160.00 011-370-004 $160.00 011-370-005 $160.00 011-370-006 $160.00 011-370-007 $160.00 011-370-008 $160.00 011-370-009 $160.00 011-370-010 $160.00 011-370-011 $160.00 011-370-012 $160.00 011-370-013 $160.00 011-370-014 $160.00 011-370-015 $160.00 011-370-016 $160.00 011-370-017 $160.00 011-370-018 $160.00 011-370-019 $160.00 011-370-020 $160.00 011-370-021 $160.00 011-370-022 $160.00 011-370-023 $160.00 011-370-024 $160.00 011-370-025 $160.00 011-370-026 $160.00 011-370-027 $160.00 011-370-028 $160.00 011-370-029 $160.00 011-370-030 $160.00 011-370-031 $160.00 011-370-032 $160.00 011-370-033 $160.00 011-370-034 $160.00 011-370-035 $160.00 011-370-036 $160.00 011-370-037 $160.00 011-370-038 $160.00 011-370-039 $160.00 011-370-040 $160.00 011-370-041 $160.00 011-370-042 $160.00 011-370-043 $160.00 011-370-044 $160.00 011-370-045 $160.00 011-370-046 $160.00 011-370-047 $160.00 011-370-048 $160.00 011-370-049 $160.00 011-370-050 $160.00 011-370-051 $160.00 011-370-052 $160.00 011-370-053 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-370-054 $160.00 011-370-055 $160.00 011-370-056 $160.00 011-370-057 $160.00 011-370-058 $160.00 011-370-059 $160.00 011-370-060 $160.00 011-370-061 $160.00 011-370-062 $160.00 011-370-063 $160.00 011-370-064 $160.00 011-370-065 $160.00 011-370-066 $160.00 011-370-067 $160.00 011-370-068 $160.00 011-370-069 $160.00 011-370-070 $160.00 011-370-071 $160.00 011-370-072 $160.00 011-370-073 $160.00 011-370-074 $160.00 011-370-075 $160.00 011-370-076 $160.00 011-370-077 $160.00 011-381-001 $160.00 011-381-002 $160.00 011-381-003 $160.00 011-381-004 $160.00 011-381-005 $160.00 011-381-006 $160.00 011-381-007 $160.00 011-381-008 $160.00 011-381-009 $160.00 011-381-010 $160.00 011-381-011 $160.00 011-381-012 $160.00 011-381-013 $160.00 011-381-014 $160.00 011-381-015 $160.00 011-381-016 $160.00 011-381-017 $160.00 011-381-018 $160.00 011-381-019 $160.00 011-381-020 $160.00 011-381-021 $160.00 011-381-022 $160.00 011-381-023 $160.00 011-381-024 $160.00 011-381-025 $160.00 011-381-026 $160.00 011-381-027 $160.00 011-381-028 $160.00 011-381-029 $160.00 011-381-030 $160.00 011-381-031 $160.00 011-381-032 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-381-033 $160.00 011-381-034 $160.00 011-381-035 $160.00 011-381-036 $160.00 011-381-037 $160.00 011-381-038 $160.00 011-381-039 $160.00 011-381-040 $160.00 011-381-041 $160.00 011-381-042 $160.00 011-381-043 $160.00 011-381-044 $160.00 011-381-045 $160.00 011-381-046 $160.00 011-381-047 $160.00 011-381-048 $160.00 011-381-049 $160.00 011-381-050 $160.00 011-381-051 $160.00 011-381-052 $160.00 011-381-053 $160.00 011-381-054 $160.00 011-381-055 $160.00 011-381-056 $160.00 011-381-057 $160.00 011-381-058 $160.00 011-390-001 $160.00 011-390-002 $160.00 011-390-003 $160.00 011-390-004 $160.00 011-390-005 $160.00 011-390-006 $160.00 011-390-007 $160.00 011-390-008 $160.00 011-390-009 $160.00 011-390-010 $160.00 011-390-011 $160.00 011-390-012 $160.00 011-390-013 $160.00 011-390-014 $160.00 011-390-015 $160.00 011-390-016 $160.00 011-390-017 $160.00 011-390-018 $160.00 011-390-019 $160.00 011-390-020 $160.00 011-390-021 $160.00 011-390-022 $160.00 011-390-023 $160.00 011-390-024 $160.00 011-390-025 $160.00 011-390-026 $160.00 011-390-027 $160.00 011-390-028 $160.00 011-390-029 $160.00 011-390-030 $160.00 82 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-390-031 $160.00 011-390-032 $160.00 011-390-033 $160.00 011-390-034 $160.00 011-390-035 $160.00 011-390-036 $160.00 011-390-037 $160.00 011-390-038 $160.00 011-390-039 $160.00 011-390-040 $160.00 011-390-041 $160.00 011-390-042 $160.00 011-390-043 $160.00 011-390-044 $160.00 011-390-045 $160.00 011-390-046 $160.00 011-390-047 $160.00 011-390-048 $160.00 011-390-049 $160.00 011-390-050 $160.00 011-390-051 $160.00 011-390-052 $160.00 011-390-053 $160.00 011-390-054 $160.00 011-390-055 $160.00 011-390-056 $160.00 011-390-057 $160.00 011-390-058 $160.00 011-390-059 $160.00 011-390-060 $160.00 011-390-061 $160.00 011-390-062 $160.00 011-390-063 $160.00 011-390-064 $160.00 011-390-065 $160.00 011-390-066 $160.00 011-390-067 $160.00 011-390-068 $160.00 011-390-069 $160.00 011-390-070 $160.00 011-390-071 $160.00 011-400-001 $160.00 011-400-002 $160.00 011-400-003 $160.00 011-400-004 $160.00 011-400-005 $160.00 011-400-006 $160.00 011-400-007 $160.00 011-400-008 $160.00 011-400-009 $160.00 011-400-010 $160.00 011-400-011 $160.00 011-400-012 $160.00 011-400-013 $160.00 011-400-014 $160.00 011-400-015 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-400-016 $160.00 011-400-017 $160.00 011-400-018 $160.00 011-400-019 $160.00 011-400-020 $160.00 011-400-021 $160.00 011-400-022 $160.00 011-400-023 $160.00 011-400-024 $160.00 011-400-025 $160.00 011-400-026 $160.00 011-400-027 $160.00 011-400-028 $160.00 011-400-029 $160.00 011-400-030 $160.00 011-400-031 $160.00 011-400-032 $160.00 011-400-033 $160.00 011-400-034 $160.00 011-400-035 $160.00 011-400-036 $160.00 011-400-037 $160.00 011-400-038 $160.00 011-400-039 $160.00 011-400-040 $160.00 011-400-041 $160.00 011-400-042 $160.00 011-400-043 $160.00 011-400-044 $160.00 011-400-045 $160.00 011-400-046 $160.00 011-400-047 $160.00 011-400-048 $160.00 011-400-049 $160.00 011-400-050 $160.00 011-400-051 $160.00 011-400-052 $160.00 011-400-053 $160.00 011-400-054 $160.00 011-400-055 $160.00 011-400-056 $160.00 011-400-057 $160.00 011-400-058 $160.00 011-400-059 $160.00 011-400-060 $160.00 011-400-061 $160.00 011-400-062 $160.00 011-400-063 $160.00 011-400-064 $160.00 011-400-065 $160.00 011-400-066 $160.00 011-400-067 $160.00 011-400-068 $160.00 011-400-069 $160.00 011-400-070 $160.00 011-400-071 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-400-072 $160.00 011-400-073 $160.00 011-400-074 $160.00 011-400-075 $160.00 011-400-076 $160.00 011-400-077 $160.00 011-400-078 $160.00 011-400-079 $160.00 011-400-080 $160.00 011-400-081 $160.00 011-400-082 $160.00 011-400-083 $160.00 011-400-084 $160.00 011-400-085 $160.00 011-400-086 $160.00 011-400-087 $160.00 011-400-088 $160.00 011-400-089 $160.00 011-400-090 $160.00 011-400-091 $160.00 011-400-092 $160.00 011-400-093 $160.00 011-400-094 $160.00 011-400-095 $160.00 011-400-096 $160.00 011-400-097 $160.00 011-400-098 $160.00 011-400-099 $160.00 011-410-001 $160.00 011-410-002 $160.00 011-410-003 $160.00 011-410-004 $160.00 011-410-005 $160.00 011-410-006 $160.00 011-410-007 $160.00 011-410-008 $160.00 011-410-009 $160.00 011-410-010 $160.00 011-410-011 $160.00 011-410-012 $160.00 011-410-013 $160.00 011-410-014 $160.00 011-410-015 $160.00 011-410-016 $160.00 011-410-017 $160.00 011-410-018 $160.00 011-410-019 $160.00 011-410-020 $160.00 011-410-021 $160.00 011-410-022 $160.00 011-410-023 $160.00 011-410-024 $160.00 011-410-025 $160.00 011-410-026 $160.00 011-410-027 $160.00 011-410-028 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-410-029 $160.00 011-410-030 $160.00 011-410-031 $160.00 011-410-032 $160.00 011-410-033 $160.00 011-410-034 $160.00 011-410-035 $160.00 011-410-036 $160.00 011-410-037 $160.00 011-410-038 $160.00 011-410-039 $160.00 011-410-040 $160.00 011-410-041 $160.00 011-410-042 $160.00 011-410-043 $160.00 011-410-044 $160.00 011-410-045 $160.00 011-410-046 $160.00 011-410-047 $160.00 011-410-048 $160.00 011-410-049 $160.00 011-410-050 $160.00 011-410-051 $160.00 011-410-052 $160.00 011-410-053 $160.00 011-410-054 $160.00 011-410-055 $160.00 011-410-056 $160.00 011-410-057 $160.00 011-410-058 $160.00 011-410-059 $160.00 011-410-060 $160.00 011-410-061 $160.00 011-410-062 $160.00 011-410-063 $160.00 011-410-064 $160.00 011-410-065 $160.00 011-410-066 $160.00 011-410-067 $160.00 011-410-068 $160.00 011-410-069 $160.00 011-410-070 $160.00 011-410-071 $160.00 011-410-072 $160.00 011-410-073 $160.00 011-410-074 $160.00 011-410-075 $160.00 011-410-076 $160.00 011-410-077 $160.00 011-421-001 $160.00 011-421-002 $160.00 011-421-003 $160.00 011-421-004 $160.00 011-421-005 $160.00 011-421-006 $160.00 011-421-007 $160.00 83 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-421-008 $160.00 011-421-009 $160.00 011-421-010 $160.00 011-421-011 $160.00 011-421-012 $160.00 011-421-013 $160.00 011-421-014 $160.00 011-421-015 $160.00 011-421-016 $160.00 011-421-017 $160.00 011-421-018 $160.00 011-421-019 $160.00 011-421-020 $160.00 011-421-021 $160.00 011-421-022 $160.00 011-421-023 $160.00 011-421-024 $160.00 011-421-025 $160.00 011-421-026 $160.00 011-421-027 $160.00 011-421-028 $160.00 011-421-029 $160.00 011-421-030 $160.00 011-421-031 $160.00 011-421-032 $160.00 011-421-033 $160.00 011-421-034 $160.00 011-421-035 $160.00 011-421-036 $160.00 011-421-037 $160.00 011-421-038 $160.00 011-421-039 $160.00 011-421-040 $160.00 011-421-041 $160.00 011-421-042 $160.00 011-421-043 $160.00 011-421-044 $160.00 011-430-001 $160.00 011-430-002 $160.00 011-430-003 $160.00 011-430-004 $160.00 011-430-005 $160.00 011-430-006 $160.00 011-430-007 $160.00 011-430-008 $160.00 011-430-009 $160.00 011-430-010 $160.00 011-430-011 $160.00 011-430-012 $160.00 011-430-013 $160.00 011-430-014 $160.00 011-430-015 $160.00 011-430-016 $160.00 011-430-017 $160.00 011-430-018 $160.00 011-430-019 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-430-020 $160.00 011-430-021 $160.00 011-430-022 $160.00 011-430-023 $160.00 011-430-024 $160.00 011-430-025 $160.00 011-430-026 $160.00 011-430-027 $160.00 011-430-028 $160.00 011-430-029 $160.00 011-430-030 $160.00 011-430-031 $160.00 011-430-032 $160.00 011-430-033 $160.00 011-430-034 $160.00 011-430-035 $160.00 011-430-036 $160.00 011-430-037 $160.00 011-430-038 $160.00 011-430-039 $160.00 011-430-040 $160.00 011-430-041 $160.00 011-430-042 $160.00 011-430-043 $160.00 011-430-044 $160.00 011-430-045 $160.00 011-430-046 $160.00 011-430-047 $160.00 011-430-048 $160.00 011-430-049 $160.00 011-430-050 $160.00 011-430-051 $160.00 011-430-052 $160.00 011-430-053 $160.00 011-430-054 $160.00 011-430-055 $160.00 011-430-056 $160.00 011-430-057 $160.00 011-430-058 $160.00 011-430-059 $160.00 011-430-060 $160.00 011-430-061 $160.00 011-430-062 $160.00 011-430-063 $160.00 011-430-064 $160.00 011-430-065 $160.00 011-430-066 $160.00 011-430-067 $160.00 011-430-068 $160.00 011-430-069 $160.00 011-430-070 $160.00 011-430-071 $160.00 011-430-072 $160.00 011-430-073 $160.00 011-430-074 $160.00 011-430-075 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-430-076 $160.00 011-430-077 $160.00 011-430-078 $160.00 011-430-079 $160.00 011-430-080 $160.00 011-441-001 $160.00 011-441-002 $160.00 011-441-003 $160.00 011-441-004 $160.00 011-441-005 $160.00 011-441-006 $160.00 011-441-007 $160.00 011-441-008 $160.00 011-441-009 $160.00 011-441-010 $160.00 011-441-011 $160.00 011-441-012 $160.00 011-441-013 $160.00 011-441-014 $160.00 011-441-015 $160.00 011-441-016 $160.00 011-441-017 $160.00 011-441-018 $160.00 011-441-019 $160.00 011-441-020 $160.00 011-441-021 $160.00 011-441-022 $160.00 011-441-023 $160.00 011-441-024 $160.00 011-441-025 $160.00 011-441-026 $160.00 011-441-027 $160.00 011-441-028 $160.00 011-441-029 $160.00 011-441-030 $160.00 011-441-031 $160.00 011-441-032 $160.00 011-441-033 $160.00 011-441-034 $160.00 011-441-035 $160.00 011-441-036 $160.00 011-441-037 $160.00 011-441-038 $160.00 011-441-039 $160.00 011-441-040 $160.00 011-441-041 $160.00 011-441-042 $160.00 011-441-043 $160.00 011-441-044 $160.00 011-441-045 $160.00 011-441-046 $160.00 011-441-047 $160.00 011-441-048 $160.00 011-441-049 $160.00 011-441-050 $160.00 011-450-001 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-450-002 $160.00 011-450-003 $160.00 011-450-004 $160.00 011-450-005 $160.00 011-450-006 $160.00 011-450-007 $160.00 011-450-008 $160.00 011-450-009 $160.00 011-450-010 $160.00 011-450-011 $160.00 011-450-012 $160.00 011-450-013 $160.00 011-450-014 $160.00 011-450-015 $160.00 011-450-016 $160.00 011-450-017 $160.00 011-450-018 $160.00 011-450-019 $160.00 011-450-020 $160.00 011-450-021 $160.00 011-450-022 $160.00 011-450-023 $160.00 011-450-024 $160.00 011-450-025 $160.00 011-450-026 $160.00 011-450-027 $160.00 011-450-028 $160.00 011-450-029 $160.00 011-450-030 $160.00 011-450-031 $160.00 011-450-032 $160.00 011-450-033 $160.00 011-450-034 $160.00 011-450-035 $160.00 011-450-036 $160.00 011-450-037 $160.00 011-450-038 $160.00 011-450-039 $160.00 011-450-040 $160.00 011-450-041 $160.00 011-450-042 $160.00 011-450-043 $160.00 011-450-044 $160.00 011-450-045 $160.00 011-450-046 $160.00 011-450-047 $160.00 011-450-048 $160.00 011-450-049 $160.00 011-450-050 $160.00 011-450-051 $160.00 011-450-052 $160.00 011-450-053 $160.00 011-450-054 $160.00 011-450-055 $160.00 011-460-001 $160.00 011-460-002 $160.00 84 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-460-003 $160.00 011-460-004 $160.00 011-460-005 $160.00 011-460-006 $160.00 011-460-007 $160.00 011-460-008 $160.00 011-460-009 $160.00 011-460-010 $160.00 011-460-011 $160.00 011-460-012 $160.00 011-460-013 $160.00 011-460-014 $160.00 011-460-015 $160.00 011-460-016 $160.00 011-460-017 $160.00 011-460-018 $160.00 011-460-019 $160.00 011-460-020 $160.00 011-460-021 $160.00 011-460-022 $160.00 011-460-023 $160.00 011-460-024 $160.00 011-460-025 $160.00 011-460-026 $160.00 011-460-027 $160.00 011-460-028 $160.00 011-460-029 $160.00 011-460-030 $160.00 011-460-031 $160.00 011-460-032 $160.00 011-460-033 $160.00 011-460-034 $160.00 011-460-035 $160.00 011-460-036 $160.00 011-460-037 $160.00 011-460-038 $160.00 011-460-039 $160.00 011-460-040 $160.00 011-460-041 $160.00 011-460-042 $160.00 011-460-043 $160.00 011-460-044 $160.00 011-460-045 $160.00 011-460-046 $160.00 011-460-047 $160.00 011-460-048 $160.00 011-460-049 $160.00 011-490-001 $160.00 011-490-002 $160.00 011-490-003 $160.00 011-490-004 $160.00 011-490-005 $160.00 011-490-006 $160.00 011-490-007 $160.00 011-490-008 $160.00 011-490-009 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-490-010 $160.00 011-490-011 $160.00 011-490-012 $160.00 011-490-013 $160.00 011-490-014 $160.00 011-490-015 $160.00 011-490-016 $160.00 011-490-017 $160.00 011-490-018 $160.00 011-490-019 $160.00 011-490-020 $160.00 011-490-021 $160.00 011-490-022 $160.00 011-490-023 $160.00 011-490-024 $160.00 011-490-025 $160.00 011-490-026 $160.00 011-490-027 $160.00 011-490-028 $160.00 011-490-029 $160.00 011-490-030 $160.00 011-490-031 $160.00 011-490-032 $160.00 011-490-033 $160.00 011-490-034 $160.00 011-490-035 $160.00 011-490-036 $160.00 011-490-037 $160.00 011-490-038 $160.00 011-490-039 $160.00 011-490-040 $160.00 011-490-041 $160.00 011-490-042 $160.00 011-490-043 $160.00 011-490-044 $160.00 011-490-045 $160.00 011-490-046 $160.00 011-490-047 $160.00 011-490-048 $160.00 011-490-049 $160.00 011-490-050 $160.00 011-490-051 $160.00 011-490-052 $160.00 011-490-053 $160.00 011-490-054 $160.00 011-490-055 $160.00 011-490-056 $160.00 011-490-057 $160.00 011-490-058 $160.00 011-490-059 $160.00 011-490-060 $160.00 011-490-061 $160.00 011-490-062 $160.00 011-490-063 $160.00 011-490-064 $160.00 011-490-065 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-490-066 $160.00 011-490-067 $160.00 011-490-068 $160.00 011-490-069 $160.00 011-490-070 $160.00 011-490-071 $160.00 011-490-072 $160.00 011-500-001 $160.00 011-500-002 $160.00 011-500-003 $160.00 011-500-004 $160.00 011-500-005 $160.00 011-500-006 $160.00 011-500-007 $160.00 011-500-008 $160.00 011-500-009 $160.00 011-500-010 $160.00 011-500-011 $160.00 011-500-012 $160.00 011-500-013 $160.00 011-500-014 $160.00 011-500-015 $160.00 011-500-016 $160.00 011-500-017 $160.00 011-500-018 $160.00 011-500-019 $160.00 011-500-020 $160.00 011-500-021 $160.00 011-500-022 $160.00 011-500-023 $160.00 011-500-024 $160.00 011-500-025 $160.00 011-500-026 $160.00 011-500-027 $160.00 011-500-028 $160.00 011-500-029 $160.00 011-500-030 $160.00 011-500-031 $160.00 011-500-032 $160.00 011-500-033 $160.00 011-500-034 $160.00 011-500-035 $160.00 011-500-036 $160.00 011-500-037 $160.00 011-500-038 $160.00 011-500-039 $160.00 011-500-040 $160.00 011-500-041 $160.00 011-500-042 $160.00 011-500-043 $160.00 011-500-044 $160.00 011-500-045 $160.00 011-500-046 $160.00 011-500-047 $160.00 011-500-048 $160.00 011-500-049 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-500-050 $160.00 011-500-051 $160.00 011-500-052 $160.00 011-500-053 $160.00 011-500-054 $160.00 011-500-055 $160.00 011-500-056 $160.00 011-500-057 $160.00 011-500-058 $160.00 011-500-059 $160.00 011-500-060 $160.00 011-500-061 $160.00 011-500-062 $160.00 011-500-063 $160.00 011-500-064 $160.00 011-500-065 $160.00 011-500-066 $160.00 011-500-067 $160.00 011-500-068 $160.00 011-500-069 $160.00 011-500-070 $160.00 011-500-071 $160.00 011-500-072 $160.00 011-500-073 $160.00 011-500-074 $160.00 011-500-075 $160.00 011-500-076 $160.00 011-500-077 $160.00 011-500-078 $160.00 011-500-079 $160.00 011-500-080 $160.00 011-500-081 $160.00 011-500-082 $160.00 011-500-083 $160.00 011-500-084 $160.00 011-500-085 $160.00 011-500-086 $160.00 011-500-087 $160.00 011-500-088 $160.00 011-500-089 $160.00 011-500-090 $160.00 011-500-091 $160.00 011-500-092 $160.00 011-500-093 $160.00 011-500-094 $160.00 011-500-095 $160.00 011-500-096 $160.00 011-500-097 $160.00 011-510-001 $160.00 011-510-002 $160.00 011-510-003 $160.00 011-510-004 $160.00 011-510-005 $160.00 011-510-006 $160.00 011-510-007 $160.00 011-510-008 $160.00 85 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-510-009 $160.00 011-510-010 $160.00 011-510-011 $160.00 011-510-012 $160.00 011-510-013 $160.00 011-510-014 $160.00 011-510-015 $160.00 011-510-016 $160.00 011-510-017 $160.00 011-510-018 $160.00 011-510-019 $160.00 011-510-020 $160.00 011-510-021 $160.00 011-510-022 $160.00 011-510-023 $160.00 011-510-024 $160.00 011-510-025 $160.00 011-510-026 $160.00 011-510-027 $160.00 011-510-028 $160.00 011-510-029 $160.00 011-510-030 $160.00 011-510-031 $160.00 011-510-032 $160.00 011-510-033 $160.00 011-510-034 $160.00 011-510-035 $160.00 011-510-036 $160.00 011-510-037 $160.00 011-510-038 $160.00 011-510-039 $160.00 011-510-040 $160.00 011-510-041 $160.00 011-510-042 $160.00 011-510-043 $160.00 011-510-044 $160.00 011-510-045 $160.00 011-510-046 $160.00 011-510-047 $160.00 011-510-048 $160.00 011-510-049 $160.00 011-510-050 $160.00 011-510-051 $160.00 011-510-052 $160.00 011-510-053 $160.00 011-510-054 $160.00 011-510-055 $160.00 011-510-056 $160.00 011-510-057 $160.00 011-510-058 $160.00 011-510-059 $160.00 011-510-060 $160.00 011-510-061 $160.00 011-510-062 $160.00 011-510-063 $160.00 011-510-064 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-510-065 $160.00 011-510-066 $160.00 011-510-067 $160.00 011-510-068 $160.00 011-510-069 $160.00 011-510-070 $160.00 011-510-071 $160.00 011-510-072 $160.00 011-510-073 $160.00 011-510-074 $160.00 011-510-075 $160.00 011-510-076 $160.00 011-510-077 $160.00 011-510-078 $160.00 011-510-079 $160.00 011-510-080 $160.00 011-510-081 $160.00 011-510-082 $160.00 011-510-083 $160.00 011-510-084 $160.00 011-510-085 $160.00 011-510-086 $160.00 011-510-087 $160.00 011-510-088 $160.00 011-520-001 $160.00 011-520-002 $160.00 011-520-003 $160.00 011-520-004 $160.00 011-520-005 $160.00 011-520-006 $160.00 011-520-007 $160.00 011-520-008 $160.00 011-520-009 $160.00 011-520-010 $160.00 011-520-011 $160.00 011-520-012 $160.00 011-520-013 $160.00 011-520-014 $160.00 011-520-015 $160.00 011-520-016 $160.00 011-520-017 $160.00 011-520-018 $160.00 011-520-019 $160.00 011-520-020 $160.00 011-520-021 $160.00 011-520-022 $160.00 011-520-023 $160.00 011-520-024 $160.00 011-520-025 $160.00 011-520-026 $160.00 011-520-027 $160.00 011-520-028 $160.00 011-520-029 $160.00 011-520-030 $160.00 011-520-031 $160.00 011-520-032 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-520-033 $160.00 011-520-034 $160.00 011-520-035 $160.00 011-520-036 $160.00 011-520-037 $160.00 011-520-038 $160.00 011-520-039 $160.00 011-520-040 $160.00 011-520-041 $160.00 011-520-042 $160.00 011-520-043 $160.00 011-520-044 $160.00 011-520-045 $160.00 011-520-046 $160.00 011-520-047 $160.00 011-520-048 $160.00 011-520-049 $160.00 011-520-050 $160.00 011-520-051 $160.00 011-520-052 $160.00 011-520-053 $160.00 011-520-054 $160.00 011-530-001 $160.00 011-530-002 $160.00 011-530-003 $160.00 011-530-004 $160.00 011-530-005 $160.00 011-530-006 $160.00 011-530-007 $160.00 011-530-008 $160.00 011-530-009 $160.00 011-530-010 $160.00 011-530-011 $160.00 011-530-012 $160.00 011-530-013 $160.00 011-530-014 $160.00 011-530-015 $160.00 011-530-016 $160.00 011-530-017 $160.00 011-530-018 $160.00 011-530-019 $160.00 011-530-020 $160.00 011-530-021 $160.00 011-530-022 $160.00 011-530-023 $160.00 011-530-024 $160.00 011-530-025 $160.00 011-530-026 $160.00 011-530-027 $160.00 011-530-028 $160.00 011-530-029 $160.00 011-530-030 $160.00 011-530-031 $160.00 011-530-032 $160.00 011-530-033 $160.00 011-530-034 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-530-035 $160.00 011-530-036 $160.00 011-530-037 $160.00 011-530-038 $160.00 011-530-039 $160.00 011-530-040 $160.00 011-530-041 $160.00 011-530-042 $160.00 011-530-043 $160.00 011-530-044 $160.00 011-530-045 $160.00 011-530-046 $160.00 011-530-047 $160.00 011-530-048 $160.00 011-530-049 $160.00 011-530-050 $160.00 011-530-051 $160.00 011-530-052 $160.00 011-530-053 $160.00 011-530-054 $160.00 011-530-055 $160.00 011-530-056 $160.00 011-540-001 $160.00 011-540-002 $160.00 011-540-003 $160.00 011-540-004 $160.00 011-540-005 $160.00 011-540-006 $160.00 011-540-007 $160.00 011-540-008 $160.00 011-540-009 $160.00 011-540-010 $160.00 011-540-011 $160.00 011-540-012 $160.00 011-540-013 $160.00 011-540-014 $160.00 011-540-015 $160.00 011-540-016 $160.00 011-540-017 $160.00 011-540-018 $160.00 011-540-019 $160.00 011-540-020 $160.00 011-540-021 $160.00 011-540-022 $160.00 011-540-023 $160.00 011-540-024 $160.00 011-540-025 $160.00 011-540-026 $160.00 011-540-027 $160.00 011-540-028 $160.00 011-540-029 $160.00 011-540-030 $160.00 011-540-031 $160.00 011-540-032 $160.00 011-540-033 $160.00 011-540-034 $160.00 86 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-540-035 $160.00 011-540-036 $160.00 011-540-037 $160.00 011-540-038 $160.00 011-540-039 $160.00 011-540-040 $160.00 011-540-041 $160.00 011-540-042 $160.00 011-540-043 $160.00 011-540-044 $160.00 011-540-045 $160.00 011-540-046 $160.00 011-540-047 $160.00 011-550-001 $160.00 011-550-002 $160.00 011-550-003 $160.00 011-550-004 $160.00 011-550-005 $160.00 011-550-006 $160.00 011-550-007 $160.00 011-550-008 $160.00 011-550-009 $160.00 011-550-010 $160.00 011-550-011 $160.00 011-550-012 $160.00 011-550-013 $160.00 011-550-014 $160.00 011-550-015 $160.00 011-550-016 $160.00 011-550-017 $160.00 011-550-018 $160.00 011-550-019 $160.00 011-550-020 $160.00 011-550-021 $160.00 011-550-022 $160.00 011-550-023 $160.00 011-550-024 $160.00 011-550-025 $160.00 011-550-026 $160.00 011-550-027 $160.00 011-550-028 $160.00 011-550-029 $160.00 011-550-030 $160.00 011-550-031 $160.00 011-550-032 $160.00 011-550-033 $160.00 011-550-034 $160.00 011-550-035 $160.00 011-550-036 $160.00 011-550-037 $160.00 011-550-038 $160.00 011-550-039 $160.00 011-550-040 $160.00 011-550-041 $160.00 011-550-042 $160.00 011-550-043 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-550-044 $160.00 011-550-045 $160.00 011-550-046 $160.00 011-550-047 $160.00 011-550-048 $160.00 011-550-049 $160.00 011-550-050 $160.00 011-550-051 $160.00 011-550-052 $160.00 011-550-053 $160.00 011-550-054 $160.00 011-550-055 $160.00 011-550-056 $160.00 011-550-057 $160.00 011-550-058 $160.00 011-550-059 $160.00 011-550-060 $160.00 011-550-061 $160.00 011-550-062 $160.00 011-550-063 $160.00 011-550-064 $160.00 011-550-065 $160.00 011-550-066 $160.00 011-550-067 $160.00 011-550-068 $160.00 011-550-069 $160.00 011-550-070 $160.00 011-550-071 $160.00 011-550-072 $160.00 011-550-073 $160.00 011-550-074 $160.00 011-550-075 $160.00 011-550-076 $160.00 011-550-077 $160.00 011-550-078 $160.00 011-550-079 $160.00 011-550-080 $160.00 011-550-081 $160.00 011-550-082 $160.00 011-550-083 $160.00 011-550-084 $160.00 011-550-085 $160.00 011-550-086 $160.00 011-550-087 $160.00 011-550-088 $160.00 011-550-089 $160.00 011-550-090 $160.00 011-550-091 $160.00 011-550-092 $160.00 011-560-001 $160.00 011-560-002 $160.00 011-560-003 $160.00 011-560-004 $160.00 011-560-005 $160.00 011-560-006 $160.00 011-560-007 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-560-008 $160.00 011-560-009 $160.00 011-560-010 $160.00 011-560-011 $160.00 011-560-012 $160.00 011-560-013 $160.00 011-560-014 $160.00 011-560-015 $160.00 011-560-016 $160.00 011-560-017 $160.00 011-560-018 $160.00 011-560-019 $160.00 011-560-020 $160.00 011-560-021 $160.00 011-560-022 $160.00 011-560-023 $160.00 011-560-024 $160.00 011-560-025 $160.00 011-560-026 $160.00 011-560-027 $160.00 011-560-028 $160.00 011-560-029 $160.00 011-560-030 $160.00 011-560-031 $160.00 011-560-032 $160.00 011-560-033 $160.00 011-560-034 $160.00 011-560-035 $160.00 011-560-036 $160.00 011-560-037 $160.00 011-560-038 $160.00 011-560-039 $160.00 011-560-040 $160.00 011-560-041 $160.00 011-560-042 $160.00 011-560-043 $160.00 011-560-044 $160.00 011-560-045 $160.00 011-560-046 $160.00 011-560-047 $160.00 011-560-048 $160.00 011-560-049 $160.00 011-560-050 $160.00 011-560-051 $160.00 011-560-052 $160.00 011-560-053 $160.00 011-560-054 $160.00 011-560-055 $160.00 011-560-056 $160.00 011-560-057 $160.00 011-560-058 $160.00 011-560-059 $160.00 011-560-060 $160.00 011-560-061 $160.00 011-560-062 $160.00 011-560-063 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-560-064 $160.00 011-560-065 $160.00 011-560-066 $160.00 011-560-067 $160.00 011-560-068 $160.00 011-560-069 $160.00 011-560-070 $160.00 011-560-071 $160.00 011-560-072 $160.00 011-560-073 $160.00 011-560-074 $160.00 011-560-075 $160.00 011-560-076 $160.00 011-560-077 $160.00 011-560-078 $160.00 011-560-079 $160.00 011-560-080 $160.00 011-560-081 $160.00 011-560-082 $160.00 011-560-083 $160.00 011-570-001 $160.00 011-570-002 $160.00 011-570-003 $160.00 011-570-004 $160.00 011-570-005 $160.00 011-570-006 $160.00 011-570-007 $160.00 011-570-008 $160.00 011-570-009 $160.00 011-570-010 $160.00 011-570-011 $160.00 011-570-012 $160.00 011-570-013 $160.00 011-570-014 $160.00 011-570-015 $160.00 011-570-016 $160.00 011-570-017 $160.00 011-570-018 $160.00 011-570-019 $160.00 011-570-020 $160.00 011-570-021 $160.00 011-570-022 $160.00 011-570-023 $160.00 011-570-024 $160.00 011-570-025 $160.00 011-570-026 $160.00 011-570-027 $160.00 011-570-028 $160.00 011-570-029 $160.00 011-570-030 $160.00 011-570-031 $160.00 011-570-032 $160.00 011-570-033 $160.00 011-570-034 $160.00 011-570-035 $160.00 011-570-036 $160.00 87 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-570-037 $160.00 011-570-038 $160.00 011-570-039 $160.00 011-570-040 $160.00 011-570-041 $160.00 011-570-042 $160.00 011-570-043 $160.00 011-570-044 $160.00 011-570-045 $160.00 011-570-046 $160.00 011-570-047 $160.00 011-570-048 $160.00 011-580-001 $160.00 011-580-002 $160.00 011-580-003 $160.00 011-580-004 $160.00 011-580-005 $160.00 011-580-006 $160.00 011-580-007 $160.00 011-580-008 $160.00 011-580-009 $160.00 011-580-010 $160.00 011-580-011 $160.00 011-580-012 $160.00 011-580-013 $160.00 011-580-014 $160.00 011-580-015 $160.00 011-580-016 $160.00 011-580-017 $160.00 011-580-018 $160.00 011-580-019 $160.00 011-580-020 $160.00 011-580-021 $160.00 011-580-022 $160.00 011-580-023 $160.00 011-580-024 $160.00 011-580-025 $160.00 011-580-026 $160.00 011-580-027 $160.00 011-580-028 $160.00 011-580-029 $160.00 011-580-030 $160.00 011-580-031 $160.00 011-580-032 $160.00 011-580-033 $160.00 011-580-034 $160.00 011-580-035 $160.00 011-580-036 $160.00 011-580-037 $160.00 011-580-038 $160.00 011-580-039 $160.00 011-580-040 $160.00 011-580-041 $160.00 011-580-042 $160.00 011-580-043 $160.00 011-580-044 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-580-045 $160.00 011-580-046 $160.00 011-580-047 $160.00 011-580-048 $160.00 011-580-049 $160.00 011-580-050 $160.00 011-580-051 $160.00 011-580-052 $160.00 011-580-053 $160.00 011-580-054 $160.00 011-580-055 $160.00 011-580-056 $160.00 011-580-057 $160.00 011-580-058 $160.00 011-580-059 $160.00 011-580-060 $160.00 011-580-061 $160.00 011-580-062 $160.00 011-580-063 $160.00 011-580-064 $160.00 011-580-065 $160.00 011-580-066 $160.00 011-580-067 $160.00 011-580-068 $160.00 011-580-069 $160.00 011-580-070 $160.00 011-580-071 $160.00 011-580-072 $160.00 011-580-073 $160.00 011-580-074 $160.00 011-580-075 $160.00 011-580-076 $160.00 011-580-077 $160.00 011-580-078 $160.00 011-580-079 $160.00 011-580-080 $160.00 011-580-081 $160.00 011-580-082 $160.00 011-590-001 $160.00 011-590-002 $160.00 011-590-003 $160.00 011-590-004 $160.00 011-590-005 $160.00 011-590-006 $160.00 011-590-007 $160.00 011-590-008 $160.00 011-590-009 $160.00 011-590-010 $160.00 011-590-011 $160.00 011-590-012 $160.00 011-590-013 $160.00 011-590-014 $160.00 011-590-015 $160.00 011-590-016 $160.00 011-590-017 $160.00 011-590-018 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-590-019 $160.00 011-590-020 $160.00 011-590-021 $160.00 011-590-022 $160.00 011-590-023 $160.00 011-590-024 $160.00 011-590-025 $160.00 011-590-026 $160.00 011-590-027 $160.00 011-590-028 $160.00 011-590-029 $160.00 011-590-030 $160.00 011-590-031 $160.00 011-590-032 $160.00 011-590-033 $160.00 011-590-034 $160.00 011-590-035 $160.00 011-590-036 $160.00 011-590-037 $160.00 011-590-038 $160.00 011-590-039 $160.00 011-590-040 $160.00 011-590-041 $160.00 011-590-042 $160.00 011-590-043 $160.00 011-590-044 $160.00 011-590-045 $160.00 011-590-046 $160.00 011-590-047 $160.00 011-590-048 $160.00 011-590-049 $160.00 011-590-050 $160.00 011-590-051 $160.00 011-590-052 $160.00 011-590-053 $160.00 011-590-054 $160.00 011-590-055 $160.00 011-630-004 $160.00 011-630-005 $160.00 011-630-006 $160.00 011-630-007 $160.00 011-630-008 $160.00 011-630-009 $160.00 011-630-018 $160.00 011-630-019 $160.00 011-630-038 $160.00 011-630-039 $160.00 011-630-057 $160.00 011-630-058 $160.00 011-630-099 $160.00 011-630-100 $160.00 011-630-101 $160.00 011-630-102 $160.00 011-630-103 $160.00 011-630-104 $160.00 011-630-105 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-630-106 $160.00 011-630-107 $160.00 011-630-108 $160.00 011-630-109 $160.00 011-630-110 $160.00 011-630-111 $160.00 011-630-112 $160.00 011-630-113 $160.00 011-630-114 $160.00 011-630-115 $160.00 011-630-116 $160.00 011-630-117 $160.00 011-630-118 $160.00 011-630-119 $160.00 011-630-120 $160.00 011-630-121 $160.00 011-630-122 $160.00 011-630-123 $160.00 011-630-124 $160.00 011-630-125 $160.00 011-630-126 $160.00 011-630-127 $160.00 011-630-128 $160.00 011-630-129 $160.00 011-630-130 $160.00 011-630-131 $160.00 011-630-132 $160.00 011-630-133 $160.00 011-630-134 $160.00 011-630-135 $160.00 011-630-136 $160.00 011-630-137 $160.00 011-630-138 $160.00 011-630-139 $160.00 011-630-140 $160.00 011-630-141 $160.00 011-630-142 $160.00 011-630-143 $160.00 011-630-144 $160.00 011-630-145 $160.00 011-630-146 $160.00 011-630-147 $160.00 011-630-148 $160.00 011-630-149 $160.00 011-630-150 $160.00 011-630-151 $160.00 011-630-152 $160.00 011-630-153 $160.00 011-630-154 $160.00 011-630-155 $160.00 011-630-156 $160.00 011-630-157 $160.00 011-630-158 $160.00 011-630-159 $160.00 011-630-160 $160.00 011-630-161 $160.00 88 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-630-162 $160.00 011-630-163 $160.00 011-630-164 $160.00 011-630-165 $160.00 011-630-166 $160.00 011-630-167 $160.00 011-630-168 $160.00 011-630-169 $160.00 011-630-170 $160.00 011-630-171 $160.00 011-630-172 $160.00 011-630-173 $160.00 011-630-174 $160.00 011-630-175 $160.00 011-630-176 $160.00 011-630-177 $160.00 011-630-178 $160.00 011-640-001 $160.00 011-640-002 $160.00 011-640-003 $160.00 011-640-004 $160.00 011-640-005 $160.00 011-640-006 $160.00 011-640-007 $160.00 011-640-008 $160.00 011-640-009 $160.00 011-640-010 $160.00 011-640-011 $160.00 011-640-012 $160.00 011-640-013 $160.00 011-640-014 $160.00 011-640-015 $160.00 011-640-016 $160.00 011-640-017 $160.00 011-640-018 $160.00 011-640-019 $160.00 011-640-020 $160.00 011-640-021 $160.00 011-640-022 $160.00 011-640-023 $160.00 011-640-024 $160.00 011-640-025 $160.00 011-640-026 $160.00 011-640-027 $160.00 011-640-028 $160.00 011-640-029 $160.00 011-640-030 $160.00 011-640-031 $160.00 011-640-032 $160.00 011-640-033 $160.00 011-640-034 $160.00 011-640-035 $160.00 011-640-036 $160.00 011-640-037 $160.00 011-640-038 $160.00 011-650-001 $80.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-650-002 $160.00 011-650-003 $160.00 011-650-004 $160.00 011-650-005 $160.00 011-650-006 $80.00 011-650-007 $80.00 011-650-008 $160.00 011-650-009 $160.00 011-650-010 $160.00 011-650-011 $160.00 011-650-012 $80.00 011-650-013 $80.00 011-650-014 $80.00 011-650-015 $80.00 011-650-016 $80.00 011-650-017 $80.00 011-650-018 $80.00 011-650-019 $80.00 011-650-020 $80.00 011-650-021 $80.00 011-650-022 $80.00 011-650-023 $80.00 011-650-024 $80.00 011-650-025 $80.00 011-650-026 $160.00 011-650-027 $160.00 011-650-028 $160.00 011-650-029 $160.00 011-650-030 $160.00 011-650-031 $160.00 011-650-032 $160.00 011-650-033 $160.00 011-650-034 $160.00 011-650-035 $160.00 011-650-036 $160.00 011-650-037 $160.00 011-650-038 $160.00 011-650-039 $160.00 011-650-040 $160.00 011-650-041 $160.00 011-650-042 $160.00 011-650-043 $160.00 011-650-044 $160.00 011-650-045 $160.00 011-650-046 $160.00 011-650-047 $160.00 011-650-048 $160.00 011-650-049 $160.00 011-650-050 $160.00 011-650-051 $160.00 011-650-052 $160.00 011-650-053 $160.00 011-650-054 $160.00 011-650-055 $160.00 011-650-056 $160.00 011-650-057 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-650-058 $160.00 011-650-059 $160.00 011-650-060 $160.00 011-650-061 $160.00 011-650-062 $160.00 011-650-063 $160.00 011-650-064 $160.00 011-650-065 $160.00 011-650-066 $160.00 011-650-067 $160.00 011-650-068 $160.00 011-650-069 $160.00 011-650-070 $160.00 011-650-071 $160.00 011-650-072 $160.00 011-650-073 $160.00 011-650-074 $160.00 011-650-075 $160.00 011-650-076 $160.00 011-650-077 $160.00 011-650-078 $160.00 011-650-079 $160.00 011-650-080 $160.00 011-650-081 $160.00 011-650-082 $160.00 011-650-083 $160.00 011-650-084 $160.00 011-650-085 $160.00 011-650-086 $160.00 011-650-087 $160.00 011-650-088 $160.00 011-650-089 $160.00 011-650-090 $160.00 011-650-091 $160.00 011-650-092 $160.00 011-650-093 $160.00 011-650-094 $160.00 011-650-095 $160.00 011-650-096 $160.00 011-650-097 $160.00 011-650-098 $160.00 011-650-099 $160.00 011-650-100 $160.00 011-650-101 $160.00 011-650-102 $160.00 011-650-103 $160.00 011-650-104 $160.00 011-650-105 $160.00 011-650-106 $160.00 011-650-107 $160.00 011-650-108 $160.00 011-650-109 $160.00 011-650-110 $160.00 011-660-001 $160.00 011-660-002 $160.00 011-660-003 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-660-004 $160.00 011-660-005 $160.00 011-660-006 $160.00 011-660-007 $160.00 011-660-008 $160.00 011-660-009 $160.00 011-660-010 $160.00 011-660-011 $160.00 011-660-012 $160.00 011-660-013 $160.00 011-660-014 $160.00 011-660-015 $160.00 011-660-016 $160.00 011-660-017 $160.00 011-660-018 $160.00 011-660-019 $160.00 011-660-020 $160.00 011-660-021 $160.00 011-660-022 $160.00 011-660-023 $160.00 011-660-024 $160.00 011-660-025 $160.00 011-660-026 $160.00 011-660-027 $160.00 011-660-028 $160.00 011-660-029 $160.00 011-660-030 $160.00 011-660-031 $160.00 011-660-032 $160.00 011-660-033 $160.00 011-660-034 $160.00 011-660-035 $160.00 011-660-036 $160.00 011-660-037 $80.00 011-660-038 $160.00 011-660-039 $160.00 011-660-040 $160.00 011-660-041 $160.00 011-660-042 $160.00 011-670-001 $160.00 011-670-002 $160.00 011-670-003 $160.00 011-670-004 $160.00 011-670-005 $160.00 011-670-006 $160.00 011-670-007 $160.00 011-670-008 $160.00 011-670-009 $160.00 011-670-010 $160.00 011-670-011 $160.00 011-670-012 $80.00 011-670-013 $80.00 011-670-014 $80.00 011-670-015 $80.00 011-670-016 $80.00 011-670-017 $80.00 89 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 61 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2833 M7 LEVY CODE: Discovery Bay West Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-670-018 $80.00 011-670-019 $160.00 011-670-020 $80.00 011-670-021 $160.00 011-670-022 $80.00 011-670-023 $160.00 011-670-024 $160.00 011-670-025 $160.00 011-670-026 $160.00 011-670-027 $160.00 011-670-028 $160.00 011-670-029 $160.00 011-670-030 $160.00 011-670-031 $160.00 011-670-032 $160.00 011-670-033 $160.00 011-670-034 $160.00 011-670-035 $160.00 011-670-036 $160.00 011-670-037 $160.00 011-670-038 $160.00 011-670-039 $160.00 011-670-040 $160.00 011-670-041 $160.00 011-670-042 $160.00 011-670-043 $160.00 011-680-001 $160.00 011-680-002 $160.00 011-680-003 $160.00 011-680-004 $80.00 011-680-005 $160.00 011-680-006 $160.00 011-680-007 $80.00 011-680-008 $80.00 011-680-009 $80.00 011-680-010 $160.00 011-680-011 $160.00 011-680-012 $160.00 011-680-013 $160.00 011-680-014 $160.00 011-680-015 $160.00 011-680-016 $160.00 011-680-017 $160.00 011-680-018 $160.00 011-680-019 $160.00 011-680-020 $160.00 011-680-021 $160.00 011-680-022 $160.00 011-680-023 $160.00 011-680-024 $160.00 011-680-025 $160.00 011-680-026 $160.00 011-680-027 $160.00 011-680-028 $80.00 011-680-029 $80.00 011-680-030 $160.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-680-031 $160.00 011-680-032 $80.00 011-680-033 $160.00 011-680-034 $160.00 011-680-035 $80.00 011-680-036 $80.00 011-680-037 $80.00 011-680-038 $80.00 011-680-039 $160.00 011-680-040 $80.00 011-680-041 $80.00 011-680-042 $80.00 011-680-043 $80.00 011-680-044 $80.00 011-680-045 $80.00 011-680-046 $80.00 011-680-047 $80.00 011-680-048 $80.00 011-680-049 $80.00 011-680-050 $80.00 011-680-051 $80.00 011-680-052 $80.00 011-680-053 $80.00 011-680-054 $80.00 011-680-055 $80.00 011-680-056 $160.00 011-680-057 $160.00 011-680-058 $160.00 011-680-059 $160.00 011-680-060 $80.00 011-690-001 $80.00 011-690-002 $80.00 011-690-003 $80.00 011-690-004 $80.00 011-690-005 $80.00 011-690-006 $80.00 011-690-007 $80.00 011-690-008 $80.00 011-690-009 $80.00 011-690-010 $80.00 011-690-011 $80.00 011-690-012 $80.00 011-690-013 $80.00 011-690-014 $80.00 011-690-015 $80.00 011-690-016 $80.00 011-690-017 $80.00 011-690-018 $80.00 011-690-019 $80.00 011-690-020 $80.00 011-690-021 $80.00 011-690-022 $80.00 011-690-023 $80.00 011-690-024 $80.00 011-690-025 $80.00 011-690-026 $80.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 011-690-027 $80.00 011-690-028 $80.00 011-690-029 $80.00 011-690-030 $80.00 011-690-031 $80.00 011-690-032 $80.00 011-690-033 $80.00 011-690-034 $80.00 011-690-035 $80.00 011-690-036 $80.00 011-690-037 $80.00 011-690-038 $80.00 011-690-039 $80.00 011-690-040 $80.00 011-690-041 $80.00 011-690-042 $80.00 011-690-043 $80.00 011-690-044 $80.00 011-690-045 $80.00 011-690-046 $80.00 011-690-047 $80.00 1925Total Parcels: $300,683.20 Total Assessment: 90 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 63 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2815 NA LEVY CODE: Parkway Estates - North Richmond Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 408-230-001 $230.00 408-230-002 $230.00 408-230-003 $230.00 408-230-004 $230.00 408-230-005 $230.00 408-230-006 $230.00 408-230-007 $230.00 408-230-008 $230.00 408-230-009 $230.00 408-230-010 $230.00 408-230-011 $230.00 408-230-012 $230.00 408-230-013 $230.00 408-230-014 $230.00 408-230-015 $230.00 408-230-016 $230.00 408-230-017 $230.00 408-230-018 $230.00 408-230-019 $230.00 408-230-020 $230.00 408-230-021 $230.00 408-230-022 $230.00 408-230-023 $230.00 408-230-024 $230.00 408-230-025 $230.00 408-230-026 $230.00 408-230-027 $230.00 408-230-028 $230.00 408-230-029 $230.00 408-230-030 $230.00 408-230-031 $230.00 408-230-032 $230.00 408-230-033 $230.00 408-230-034 $230.00 408-230-035 $230.00 408-230-036 $230.00 408-230-037 $230.00 408-230-038 $230.00 408-230-039 $230.00 408-230-040 $230.00 408-230-041 $230.00 408-230-042 $230.00 408-230-043 $230.00 408-230-044 $230.00 408-230-045 $230.00 408-230-046 $230.00 408-230-047 $230.00 408-230-048 $230.00 408-230-049 $230.00 408-230-050 $230.00 408-230-051 $230.00 408-230-052 $230.00 408-230-053 $230.00 408-230-054 $230.00 408-230-055 $230.00 408-230-056 $230.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 408-230-057 $230.00 408-230-058 $230.00 408-230-059 $230.00 408-230-060 $230.00 408-230-061 $230.00 408-230-062 $230.00 408-230-063 $230.00 408-230-064 $230.00 408-230-065 $230.00 408-230-066 $230.00 408-230-067 $230.00 408-230-068 $230.00 408-230-069 $230.00 408-230-070 $230.00 408-230-071 $230.00 408-230-072 $230.00 408-230-073 $230.00 408-230-074 $230.00 408-230-075 $230.00 408-230-076 $230.00 408-230-077 $230.00 408-230-078 $230.00 408-230-079 $230.00 408-230-080 $230.00 408-230-081 $230.00 408-230-082 $230.00 408-230-083 $230.00 408-230-084 $230.00 408-230-085 $230.00 408-230-086 $230.00 408-230-087 $230.00 87Total Parcels: $20,010.00 Total Assessment: 91 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 64 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2864 L1 LEVY CODE: California Reflections - Pinole Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 403-540-001 $250.00 403-540-002 $250.00 403-540-003 $250.00 403-540-004 $250.00 403-540-005 $250.00 403-540-006 $250.00 403-540-007 $250.00 403-540-008 $250.00 403-540-009 $250.00 403-540-010 $250.00 403-540-011 $250.00 403-540-012 $250.00 403-540-013 $250.00 403-540-014 $250.00 403-540-015 $250.00 403-540-016 $250.00 403-540-017 $250.00 403-540-018 $250.00 403-540-019 $250.00 403-540-020 $250.00 403-540-021 $250.00 403-540-022 $250.00 403-540-023 $250.00 403-540-024 $250.00 403-540-025 $250.00 403-540-026 $250.00 403-540-027 $250.00 403-540-028 $250.00 403-540-029 $250.00 403-540-030 $250.00 403-540-031 $250.00 31Total Parcels: $7,750.00 Total Assessment: 92 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 68 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2882 NB LEVY CODE: Wendt Ranch - Danville Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-530-001 $5.00 206-530-002 $5.00 206-530-003 $5.00 206-530-004 $5.00 206-530-005 $5.00 206-530-006 $5.00 206-530-007 $5.00 206-530-008 $5.00 206-530-009 $5.00 206-530-010 $5.00 206-530-011 $5.00 206-530-012 $5.00 206-530-013 $5.00 206-530-014 $5.00 206-530-015 $5.00 206-530-016 $5.00 206-530-017 $5.00 206-530-018 $5.00 206-530-019 $5.00 206-530-020 $5.00 206-530-021 $5.00 206-530-022 $5.00 206-530-023 $5.00 206-530-024 $5.00 206-530-025 $5.00 206-530-026 $5.00 206-530-027 $5.00 206-530-028 $5.00 206-530-029 $5.00 206-530-030 $5.00 206-530-031 $5.00 206-530-032 $5.00 206-530-033 $5.00 206-530-034 $5.00 206-530-035 $5.00 206-530-036 $5.00 206-530-037 $5.00 206-530-038 $5.00 206-530-039 $5.00 206-530-040 $5.00 206-530-041 $5.00 206-530-042 $5.00 206-530-043 $5.00 206-530-044 $5.00 206-530-045 $5.00 206-530-046 $5.00 206-530-047 $5.00 206-530-048 $5.00 206-530-049 $5.00 206-530-050 $5.00 206-530-051 $5.00 206-530-052 $5.00 206-530-053 $5.00 206-530-054 $5.00 206-530-055 $5.00 206-530-056 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-530-057 $5.00 206-530-058 $5.00 206-530-059 $5.00 206-530-060 $5.00 206-530-061 $5.00 206-530-062 $5.00 206-530-063 $5.00 206-530-064 $5.00 206-530-065 $5.00 206-530-066 $5.00 206-530-067 $5.00 206-530-068 $5.00 206-530-069 $5.00 206-530-070 $5.00 206-530-071 $5.00 206-530-072 $5.00 206-530-073 $5.00 206-530-074 $5.00 206-530-075 $5.00 206-530-076 $5.00 206-530-077 $5.00 206-530-078 $5.00 206-530-079 $5.00 206-550-001 $5.00 206-550-002 $5.00 206-550-003 $5.00 206-550-004 $5.00 206-550-005 $5.00 206-550-006 $5.00 206-550-007 $5.00 206-550-008 $5.00 206-550-009 $5.00 206-550-010 $5.00 206-550-011 $5.00 206-550-012 $5.00 206-550-013 $5.00 206-550-014 $5.00 206-550-015 $5.00 206-550-016 $5.00 206-550-017 $5.00 206-550-018 $5.00 206-550-019 $5.00 206-550-020 $5.00 206-550-021 $5.00 206-550-022 $5.00 206-550-023 $5.00 206-550-024 $5.00 206-550-025 $5.00 206-550-026 $5.00 206-550-027 $5.00 206-550-028 $5.00 206-550-029 $5.00 206-550-030 $5.00 206-550-031 $5.00 206-550-032 $5.00 206-550-033 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-550-034 $5.00 206-550-035 $5.00 206-550-036 $5.00 206-550-037 $5.00 206-650-001 $5.00 206-650-002 $5.00 206-650-003 $5.00 206-650-004 $5.00 206-650-005 $5.00 206-650-006 $5.00 206-650-007 $5.00 206-650-008 $5.00 206-650-009 $5.00 125Total Parcels: $625.00 Total Assessment: 93 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 69 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2871 NL LEVY CODE: Alamo Creek - Danville Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-030-082 $300.00 206-030-083 $6.60 206-030-085 $397.50 206-660-001 $5.00 206-660-002 $5.00 206-660-003 $5.00 206-660-004 $5.00 206-660-005 $5.00 206-660-006 $5.00 206-660-007 $5.00 206-660-008 $5.00 206-660-009 $5.00 206-660-010 $5.00 206-660-011 $5.00 206-660-012 $5.00 206-660-013 $5.00 206-660-014 $5.00 206-660-015 $5.00 206-660-016 $5.00 206-660-017 $5.00 206-660-018 $5.00 206-660-019 $5.00 206-660-020 $5.00 206-660-021 $5.00 206-660-022 $5.00 206-660-023 $5.00 206-660-024 $5.00 206-660-025 $5.00 206-660-026 $5.00 206-660-027 $5.00 206-660-028 $5.00 206-660-029 $5.00 206-660-030 $5.00 206-660-031 $5.00 206-660-032 $5.00 206-660-033 $5.00 206-660-034 $5.00 206-660-035 $5.00 206-660-036 $5.00 206-660-037 $5.00 206-660-038 $5.00 206-660-039 $5.00 206-660-040 $5.00 206-660-041 $5.00 206-660-042 $5.00 206-660-043 $5.00 206-660-044 $5.00 206-660-045 $5.00 206-660-046 $5.00 206-660-047 $5.00 206-660-048 $5.00 206-660-049 $5.00 206-660-050 $5.00 206-670-001 $5.00 206-670-002 $5.00 206-670-003 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-670-004 $5.00 206-670-005 $5.00 206-670-006 $5.00 206-670-007 $5.00 206-670-008 $5.00 206-670-009 $5.00 206-670-010 $5.00 206-670-011 $5.00 206-670-012 $5.00 206-670-013 $5.00 206-670-014 $5.00 206-670-015 $5.00 206-670-016 $5.00 206-670-017 $5.00 206-670-018 $5.00 206-670-019 $5.00 206-670-020 $5.00 206-670-021 $5.00 206-670-022 $5.00 206-670-023 $5.00 206-670-024 $5.00 206-670-025 $5.00 206-670-026 $5.00 206-670-027 $5.00 206-670-028 $5.00 206-670-029 $5.00 206-670-030 $5.00 206-670-031 $5.00 206-670-032 $5.00 206-670-033 $5.00 206-670-034 $5.00 206-670-035 $5.00 206-670-036 $5.00 206-670-037 $5.00 206-670-038 $5.00 206-670-039 $5.00 206-670-040 $5.00 206-670-041 $5.00 206-670-042 $5.00 206-670-043 $5.00 206-670-044 $5.00 206-670-045 $5.00 206-670-046 $5.00 206-670-047 $5.00 206-670-048 $5.00 206-670-049 $5.00 206-670-050 $5.00 206-680-001 $5.00 206-680-002 $5.00 206-680-003 $5.00 206-680-004 $5.00 206-680-005 $5.00 206-680-006 $5.00 206-680-007 $5.00 206-680-008 $5.00 206-680-009 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-680-010 $5.00 206-680-011 $5.00 206-680-012 $5.00 206-680-013 $5.00 206-680-014 $5.00 206-680-015 $5.00 206-680-016 $5.00 206-680-017 $5.00 206-680-018 $5.00 206-680-019 $5.00 206-680-020 $5.00 206-700-001 $2.50 206-700-002 $2.50 206-700-003 $2.50 206-700-004 $2.50 206-700-005 $2.50 206-700-006 $2.50 206-700-007 $2.50 206-700-008 $2.50 206-700-009 $2.50 206-700-010 $2.50 206-700-011 $2.50 206-700-012 $2.50 206-700-013 $2.50 206-700-014 $2.50 206-700-015 $2.50 206-700-016 $2.50 206-700-017 $2.50 206-700-018 $2.50 206-700-019 $2.50 206-700-020 $2.50 206-700-021 $2.50 206-700-022 $2.50 206-700-023 $2.50 206-700-024 $2.50 206-700-025 $2.50 206-700-026 $2.50 206-700-027 $2.50 206-700-028 $2.50 206-700-029 $2.50 206-700-030 $2.50 206-700-031 $2.50 206-700-032 $2.50 206-700-033 $2.50 206-700-034 $2.50 206-700-035 $2.50 206-700-036 $2.50 206-700-037 $2.50 206-700-038 $2.50 206-700-039 $2.50 206-700-040 $2.50 206-700-041 $2.50 206-700-042 $2.50 206-700-043 $2.50 206-700-044 $2.50 206-700-045 $2.50 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-700-046 $2.50 206-700-047 $2.50 206-700-048 $2.50 206-700-049 $2.50 206-700-050 $2.50 206-700-051 $2.50 206-700-052 $2.50 206-700-053 $2.50 206-700-054 $2.50 206-700-055 $2.50 206-700-056 $2.50 206-700-057 $2.50 206-700-058 $2.50 206-700-059 $2.50 206-700-060 $2.50 206-700-061 $2.50 206-700-062 $2.50 206-700-063 $2.50 206-700-064 $2.50 206-700-065 $2.50 206-700-066 $2.50 206-700-067 $2.50 206-700-068 $2.50 206-700-069 $2.50 206-700-070 $2.50 206-700-071 $2.50 206-700-072 $2.50 206-700-073 $2.50 206-700-074 $2.50 206-700-075 $2.50 206-700-076 $2.50 206-700-077 $2.50 206-700-078 $2.50 206-700-079 $2.50 206-700-080 $2.50 206-700-081 $2.50 206-700-082 $2.50 206-700-083 $2.50 206-700-084 $2.50 206-700-085 $2.50 206-700-086 $2.50 206-700-087 $2.50 206-700-088 $2.50 206-700-089 $2.50 206-700-090 $2.50 206-700-091 $2.50 206-700-092 $2.50 206-700-093 $2.50 206-700-094 $2.50 206-700-095 $2.50 206-700-096 $2.50 206-700-097 $2.50 206-700-098 $2.50 206-700-099 $2.50 206-700-100 $2.50 206-700-101 $2.50 94 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 69 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2871 NL LEVY CODE: Alamo Creek - Danville Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-700-102 $2.50 206-700-103 $2.50 206-700-104 $2.50 206-700-105 $2.50 206-700-106 $2.50 206-700-107 $2.50 206-700-108 $2.50 206-700-109 $2.50 206-700-110 $2.50 206-700-111 $2.50 206-700-112 $2.50 206-700-113 $2.50 206-700-114 $2.50 206-700-115 $2.50 206-700-116 $2.50 206-700-117 $2.50 206-700-118 $2.50 206-700-119 $2.50 206-700-120 $2.50 206-700-121 $2.50 206-700-122 $2.50 206-700-123 $2.50 206-700-124 $2.50 206-700-125 $2.50 206-700-126 $2.50 206-700-127 $2.50 206-710-001 $5.00 206-710-002 $5.00 206-710-003 $5.00 206-710-004 $5.00 206-710-005 $5.00 206-710-006 $5.00 206-710-007 $5.00 206-710-008 $5.00 206-710-009 $5.00 206-710-010 $5.00 206-710-011 $5.00 206-710-012 $5.00 206-710-013 $5.00 206-710-014 $5.00 206-710-015 $5.00 206-710-016 $5.00 206-710-017 $5.00 206-710-018 $5.00 206-710-019 $5.00 206-710-020 $5.00 206-710-021 $5.00 206-710-022 $5.00 206-710-023 $5.00 206-710-024 $5.00 206-710-025 $5.00 206-710-026 $5.00 206-710-027 $5.00 206-710-028 $5.00 206-710-029 $5.00 206-710-030 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-710-031 $5.00 206-710-032 $5.00 206-710-033 $5.00 206-710-034 $5.00 206-710-035 $5.00 206-710-036 $5.00 206-710-037 $5.00 206-710-038 $5.00 206-710-039 $5.00 206-710-040 $5.00 206-710-041 $5.00 206-710-042 $5.00 206-710-043 $5.00 206-710-044 $5.00 206-710-045 $5.00 206-710-046 $5.00 206-710-047 $5.00 206-710-048 $5.00 206-710-049 $5.00 206-710-050 $5.00 206-710-051 $5.00 206-710-052 $5.00 206-710-053 $5.00 206-710-054 $5.00 206-710-055 $5.00 206-710-056 $5.00 206-710-057 $5.00 206-710-058 $5.00 206-710-059 $5.00 206-710-060 $5.00 206-720-001 $5.00 206-720-002 $5.00 206-720-003 $5.00 206-720-004 $5.00 206-720-005 $5.00 206-720-006 $5.00 206-720-007 $5.00 206-720-008 $5.00 206-720-009 $5.00 206-720-010 $5.00 206-720-011 $5.00 206-720-012 $5.00 206-720-013 $5.00 206-720-014 $5.00 206-720-015 $5.00 206-720-016 $5.00 206-720-017 $5.00 206-720-018 $5.00 206-720-019 $5.00 206-720-020 $5.00 206-720-021 $5.00 206-720-022 $5.00 206-720-023 $5.00 206-720-024 $5.00 206-720-025 $5.00 206-720-026 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-720-027 $5.00 206-720-028 $5.00 206-720-029 $5.00 206-720-030 $5.00 206-720-031 $5.00 206-720-032 $5.00 206-720-033 $5.00 206-720-034 $5.00 206-720-035 $5.00 206-720-036 $5.00 206-720-037 $5.00 206-720-038 $5.00 206-720-039 $5.00 206-720-040 $5.00 206-720-041 $5.00 206-720-042 $5.00 206-720-043 $5.00 206-720-044 $5.00 206-720-045 $5.00 206-720-046 $5.00 206-720-047 $5.00 206-720-048 $5.00 206-720-049 $5.00 206-720-050 $5.00 206-720-051 $5.00 206-720-052 $5.00 206-720-053 $5.00 206-720-054 $5.00 206-720-055 $5.00 206-720-056 $5.00 206-720-057 $5.00 206-720-058 $5.00 206-720-059 $5.00 206-720-060 $5.00 206-720-061 $5.00 206-720-062 $5.00 206-720-063 $5.00 206-720-064 $5.00 206-720-065 $5.00 206-720-066 $5.00 206-720-067 $5.00 206-720-068 $5.00 206-720-069 $5.00 206-720-070 $5.00 206-720-071 $5.00 206-720-072 $5.00 206-720-073 $5.00 206-720-074 $5.00 206-720-075 $5.00 206-720-076 $5.00 206-720-077 $5.00 206-720-078 $5.00 206-730-001 $5.00 206-730-002 $5.00 206-730-003 $5.00 206-730-004 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-730-005 $5.00 206-730-006 $5.00 206-730-007 $5.00 206-730-008 $5.00 206-730-009 $5.00 206-730-010 $5.00 206-730-011 $5.00 206-730-012 $5.00 206-730-013 $5.00 206-730-014 $5.00 206-730-015 $5.00 206-730-016 $5.00 206-730-017 $5.00 206-730-018 $5.00 206-730-019 $5.00 206-730-020 $5.00 206-730-021 $5.00 206-730-022 $5.00 206-730-023 $5.00 206-730-024 $5.00 206-730-025 $5.00 206-730-026 $5.00 206-730-030 $5.00 206-730-031 $5.00 206-730-032 $5.00 206-730-033 $5.00 206-730-034 $5.00 206-730-035 $5.00 206-730-036 $5.00 206-730-037 $5.00 206-730-038 $5.00 206-730-039 $5.00 206-730-040 $5.00 206-730-041 $5.00 206-730-042 $5.00 206-730-043 $5.00 206-730-044 $5.00 206-730-045 $5.00 206-730-046 $5.00 206-730-047 $5.00 206-730-048 $5.00 206-730-049 $5.00 206-730-050 $5.00 206-730-051 $5.00 206-730-052 $5.00 206-740-001 $5.00 206-740-002 $5.00 206-740-003 $5.00 206-740-004 $5.00 206-740-005 $5.00 206-740-006 $5.00 206-740-007 $5.00 206-740-008 $5.00 206-740-009 $5.00 206-740-010 $5.00 206-740-011 $5.00 95 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 69 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2871 NL LEVY CODE: Alamo Creek - Danville Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-740-012 $5.00 206-740-013 $5.00 206-740-014 $5.00 206-740-015 $5.00 206-740-016 $5.00 206-740-017 $5.00 206-740-018 $5.00 206-740-019 $5.00 206-740-020 $5.00 206-740-021 $5.00 206-740-022 $5.00 206-740-023 $5.00 206-740-024 $5.00 206-740-025 $5.00 206-740-026 $5.00 206-740-027 $5.00 206-740-028 $5.00 206-740-029 $5.00 206-750-001 $5.00 206-750-002 $5.00 206-750-003 $5.00 206-750-004 $5.00 206-750-005 $5.00 206-750-006 $5.00 206-750-007 $5.00 206-750-008 $5.00 206-750-009 $5.00 206-750-010 $5.00 206-750-011 $5.00 206-750-012 $5.00 206-750-013 $5.00 206-750-014 $5.00 206-750-015 $5.00 206-750-016 $5.00 206-750-017 $5.00 206-750-018 $5.00 206-750-019 $5.00 206-750-020 $5.00 206-750-021 $5.00 206-750-022 $5.00 206-750-023 $5.00 206-750-024 $5.00 206-750-025 $5.00 206-750-026 $5.00 206-750-027 $5.00 206-750-028 $5.00 206-750-029 $5.00 206-750-030 $5.00 206-750-031 $5.00 206-750-032 $5.00 206-750-033 $5.00 206-750-034 $5.00 206-750-035 $5.00 206-750-036 $5.00 206-750-037 $5.00 206-750-038 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-750-039 $5.00 206-750-040 $5.00 206-750-041 $5.00 206-750-042 $5.00 206-750-043 $5.00 206-750-044 $5.00 206-750-045 $5.00 206-750-046 $5.00 206-750-047 $5.00 206-750-048 $5.00 206-750-049 $5.00 206-750-050 $5.00 206-750-051 $5.00 206-750-052 $5.00 206-750-053 $5.00 206-750-054 $5.00 206-750-055 $5.00 206-750-056 $5.00 206-750-057 $5.00 206-750-058 $5.00 206-750-059 $5.00 206-750-060 $5.00 206-750-061 $5.00 206-750-062 $5.00 206-750-063 $5.00 206-750-064 $5.00 206-750-065 $5.00 206-750-066 $5.00 206-750-067 $5.00 206-750-068 $5.00 206-750-069 $5.00 206-750-070 $5.00 206-750-071 $5.00 206-750-072 $5.00 206-750-073 $5.00 206-750-074 $5.00 206-750-075 $5.00 206-750-076 $5.00 206-750-077 $5.00 206-750-078 $5.00 206-750-079 $5.00 206-750-080 $5.00 206-750-081 $5.00 206-750-082 $5.00 206-750-083 $5.00 206-750-084 $5.00 206-750-085 $5.00 206-750-086 $5.00 206-750-087 $5.00 206-750-088 $5.00 206-750-089 $5.00 206-750-090 $5.00 206-760-001 $5.00 206-760-002 $5.00 206-760-003 $5.00 206-760-004 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-760-005 $5.00 206-760-006 $2.50 206-760-007 $5.00 206-760-008 $5.00 206-760-009 $5.00 206-760-010 $2.50 206-760-011 $5.00 206-760-012 $5.00 206-760-013 $5.00 206-760-014 $2.50 206-760-015 $5.00 206-760-016 $5.00 206-760-017 $5.00 206-760-018 $2.50 206-760-019 $5.00 206-760-020 $5.00 206-760-021 $5.00 206-770-001 $5.00 206-770-002 $5.00 206-770-003 $5.00 206-770-004 $5.00 206-770-005 $5.00 206-770-006 $5.00 206-770-007 $2.50 206-770-008 $5.00 206-770-009 $5.00 206-770-010 $5.00 206-770-011 $2.50 206-770-012 $5.00 206-770-013 $5.00 206-770-014 $2.50 206-770-015 $5.00 206-770-016 $5.00 206-770-017 $5.00 206-770-018 $5.00 206-770-019 $5.00 206-770-020 $5.00 206-770-021 $5.00 206-770-022 $2.50 206-770-023 $5.00 206-770-024 $2.50 206-770-025 $5.00 206-770-026 $2.50 206-770-027 $5.00 206-780-001 $5.00 206-780-002 $2.50 206-780-003 $2.50 206-780-004 $2.50 206-780-005 $2.50 206-780-006 $2.50 206-780-007 $2.50 206-780-008 $2.50 206-780-009 $2.50 206-780-010 $2.50 206-780-011 $2.50 206-780-012 $2.50 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-780-013 $2.50 206-780-014 $2.50 206-780-015 $2.50 206-780-016 $2.50 206-780-017 $2.50 206-780-018 $2.50 206-790-001 $2.50 206-790-002 $2.50 206-790-003 $2.50 206-790-004 $2.50 206-790-005 $5.00 206-790-006 $2.50 206-790-007 $2.50 206-790-008 $2.50 206-790-009 $2.50 206-790-010 $2.50 206-790-011 $2.50 206-790-012 $5.00 206-790-013 $5.00 206-790-014 $5.00 206-790-015 $2.50 206-790-016 $2.50 206-790-017 $2.50 206-790-018 $2.50 206-790-019 $2.50 206-790-020 $2.50 206-790-021 $2.50 206-790-022 $2.50 206-790-023 $2.50 206-790-024 $2.50 206-790-025 $5.00 206-790-026 $2.50 206-790-027 $2.50 206-790-028 $2.50 206-790-029 $2.50 206-800-001 $2.50 206-800-002 $2.50 206-800-003 $5.00 206-800-004 $5.00 206-800-005 $5.00 206-800-006 $5.00 206-800-007 $5.00 206-800-008 $5.00 206-800-009 $5.00 206-800-010 $5.00 206-800-011 $5.00 206-800-012 $5.00 206-800-013 $5.00 206-800-014 $5.00 206-800-015 $5.00 206-800-016 $5.00 206-800-017 $5.00 206-800-018 $5.00 206-800-019 $5.00 206-800-020 $5.00 206-800-021 $5.00 96 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 69 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2871 NL LEVY CODE: Alamo Creek - Danville Area Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-800-022 $5.00 206-800-023 $5.00 206-800-024 $5.00 206-800-025 $5.00 206-800-026 $5.00 206-800-027 $5.00 206-800-028 $5.00 206-800-029 $5.00 206-800-030 $5.00 206-800-031 $5.00 206-800-032 $5.00 206-800-033 $5.00 206-800-034 $5.00 206-800-035 $5.00 206-800-036 $5.00 206-800-037 $5.00 206-800-038 $5.00 206-800-039 $5.00 206-800-040 $5.00 206-800-041 $5.00 206-800-042 $5.00 206-800-043 $5.00 206-800-044 $5.00 206-800-045 $5.00 206-800-046 $2.50 206-800-047 $2.50 206-800-048 $2.50 206-800-049 $2.50 206-800-050 $2.50 206-800-051 $5.00 206-800-052 $5.00 206-800-053 $5.00 206-800-054 $2.50 206-800-055 $2.50 206-800-056 $2.50 206-800-057 $5.00 206-800-058 $5.00 206-800-059 $5.00 206-800-060 $5.00 206-800-061 $5.00 206-800-062 $5.00 206-800-063 $5.00 206-800-064 $5.00 206-800-065 $5.00 206-800-066 $5.00 206-800-067 $5.00 206-810-001 $5.00 206-810-002 $5.00 206-810-003 $5.00 206-810-004 $5.00 206-810-005 $5.00 206-810-006 $5.00 206-810-007 $5.00 206-810-008 $5.00 206-810-009 $5.00 206-810-010 $5.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-810-011 $5.00 206-810-012 $5.00 206-810-013 $5.00 206-810-014 $5.00 206-810-015 $5.00 206-810-016 $5.00 206-810-017 $5.00 206-810-018 $5.00 206-810-019 $5.00 206-810-020 $5.00 206-810-021 $5.00 206-810-022 $5.00 206-810-023 $5.00 206-810-024 $5.00 206-810-025 $5.00 206-810-026 $5.00 206-810-027 $5.00 206-810-028 $5.00 206-810-029 $5.00 206-810-030 $5.00 206-810-031 $5.00 206-820-001 $5.00 206-820-002 $5.00 206-820-003 $5.00 206-820-004 $5.00 206-820-005 $5.00 206-820-006 $5.00 206-820-007 $5.00 206-820-008 $5.00 206-820-009 $5.00 206-820-010 $5.00 206-820-011 $5.00 206-820-012 $5.00 206-820-013 $5.00 206-820-014 $5.00 206-820-015 $5.00 206-820-016 $5.00 206-820-017 $5.00 206-820-018 $5.00 206-820-019 $5.00 206-820-020 $5.00 206-820-021 $5.00 206-820-022 $5.00 206-820-023 $2.50 206-820-024 $2.50 206-820-025 $2.50 206-820-026 $5.00 206-820-027 $5.00 206-820-028 $5.00 206-820-029 $5.00 206-820-030 $5.00 206-820-031 $2.50 206-820-032 $2.50 206-820-033 $2.50 206-820-034 $2.50 206-820-035 $2.50 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-820-036 $5.00 206-820-037 $2.50 206-820-038 $2.50 206-820-039 $2.50 206-820-040 $2.50 206-820-041 $2.50 206-820-042 $2.50 206-820-043 $2.50 206-820-044 $2.50 206-820-045 $2.50 206-820-046 $2.50 206-820-047 $2.50 206-820-048 $2.50 206-820-049 $2.50 206-820-050 $2.50 206-820-051 $5.00 206-820-052 $5.00 206-820-053 $2.50 206-820-054 $2.50 206-820-055 $5.00 206-820-056 $5.00 206-820-057 $5.00 206-820-058 $5.00 206-820-059 $5.00 206-820-060 $5.00 206-820-061 $5.00 810Total Parcels: $4,209.10 Total Assessment: 97 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 70 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2885 M2 LEVY CODE: Intervening Properties Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-580-001 $200.00 206-580-002 $200.00 206-580-003 $200.00 206-580-004 $200.00 206-580-005 $200.00 206-580-006 $200.00 206-580-007 $200.00 206-580-008 $200.00 206-580-009 $200.00 206-580-010 $200.00 206-580-011 $200.00 206-580-012 $200.00 206-580-013 $200.00 206-580-014 $200.00 206-580-015 $200.00 206-580-016 $200.00 206-580-017 $200.00 206-580-018 $200.00 206-580-019 $200.00 206-580-020 $200.00 206-580-021 $200.00 206-580-022 $200.00 206-580-023 $200.00 206-580-024 $200.00 206-580-025 $200.00 206-580-026 $200.00 206-580-027 $200.00 206-580-028 $200.00 206-580-029 $200.00 206-580-030 $200.00 206-580-031 $200.00 206-580-032 $200.00 206-580-033 $200.00 206-580-034 $200.00 206-580-035 $200.00 206-580-037 $9,600.00 206-590-001 $200.00 206-590-002 $200.00 206-590-003 $200.00 206-590-004 $200.00 206-590-005 $200.00 206-590-006 $200.00 206-590-007 $200.00 206-590-008 $200.00 206-590-009 $200.00 206-590-010 $200.00 206-590-011 $200.00 206-590-012 $200.00 206-590-013 $200.00 206-590-014 $200.00 206-590-015 $200.00 206-590-016 $200.00 206-590-017 $200.00 206-590-018 $200.00 206-590-019 $200.00 206-590-020 $200.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-590-021 $200.00 206-590-022 $200.00 206-590-023 $200.00 206-590-024 $200.00 206-590-025 $200.00 206-590-026 $200.00 206-590-027 $200.00 206-590-028 $200.00 206-590-029 $200.00 206-590-030 $200.00 206-590-031 $200.00 206-590-032 $200.00 206-590-033 $200.00 206-590-034 $200.00 206-590-035 $200.00 206-590-036 $200.00 206-590-037 $200.00 206-590-038 $200.00 206-590-039 $200.00 206-590-040 $200.00 206-590-041 $200.00 206-590-042 $200.00 206-590-043 $200.00 206-590-044 $200.00 206-590-045 $200.00 206-590-046 $200.00 206-590-047 $200.00 206-590-048 $200.00 206-590-049 $200.00 206-590-050 $200.00 206-590-051 $200.00 206-590-052 $200.00 206-590-053 $200.00 206-590-054 $200.00 206-590-055 $200.00 206-590-056 $200.00 206-590-057 $200.00 206-590-058 $200.00 206-590-059 $200.00 206-590-060 $200.00 206-590-061 $200.00 206-590-062 $200.00 206-590-063 $200.00 206-590-064 $200.00 206-590-065 $200.00 206-590-066 $200.00 206-590-067 $200.00 206-590-068 $200.00 206-590-069 $200.00 206-590-070 $200.00 206-590-071 $200.00 206-590-072 $200.00 206-590-073 $200.00 206-590-074 $200.00 206-590-075 $200.00 206-590-076 $200.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-590-077 $200.00 206-590-078 $200.00 206-590-079 $200.00 206-590-080 $200.00 206-590-081 $200.00 206-590-082 $200.00 206-590-083 $200.00 206-590-084 $200.00 206-590-085 $200.00 206-590-086 $200.00 206-590-087 $200.00 206-590-088 $200.00 206-590-089 $200.00 206-590-090 $200.00 206-600-001 $200.00 206-600-002 $200.00 206-600-003 $200.00 206-600-004 $200.00 206-600-005 $200.00 206-600-006 $200.00 206-600-007 $200.00 206-600-008 $200.00 206-600-009 $200.00 206-600-010 $200.00 206-600-011 $200.00 206-600-012 $200.00 206-600-013 $200.00 206-600-014 $200.00 206-600-015 $200.00 206-600-016 $200.00 206-600-017 $200.00 206-600-018 $200.00 206-600-019 $200.00 206-600-020 $200.00 206-600-021 $200.00 206-600-022 $200.00 206-600-023 $200.00 206-600-024 $200.00 206-600-025 $200.00 206-600-026 $200.00 206-600-027 $200.00 206-600-028 $200.00 206-600-029 $200.00 206-600-030 $200.00 206-600-031 $200.00 206-600-032 $200.00 206-600-033 $200.00 206-600-034 $200.00 206-600-035 $200.00 206-600-036 $200.00 206-600-037 $200.00 206-600-038 $200.00 206-600-039 $200.00 206-600-040 $200.00 206-600-041 $200.00 206-600-042 $200.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-600-043 $200.00 206-600-044 $200.00 206-600-045 $200.00 206-600-046 $200.00 206-600-047 $200.00 206-600-048 $200.00 206-600-049 $200.00 206-600-050 $200.00 206-600-051 $200.00 206-600-052 $200.00 206-600-053 $200.00 206-600-054 $200.00 206-600-055 $200.00 206-600-056 $200.00 206-600-057 $200.00 206-600-058 $200.00 206-600-059 $200.00 206-600-060 $200.00 206-600-061 $200.00 206-600-062 $200.00 206-600-063 $200.00 206-600-064 $200.00 206-600-065 $200.00 206-600-066 $200.00 206-600-067 $200.00 206-600-068 $200.00 206-600-069 $200.00 206-600-070 $200.00 206-600-071 $200.00 206-610-001 $200.00 206-610-002 $200.00 206-610-003 $200.00 206-610-004 $200.00 206-610-005 $200.00 206-610-006 $200.00 206-610-007 $200.00 206-610-008 $200.00 206-610-009 $200.00 206-610-010 $200.00 206-610-011 $200.00 206-610-012 $200.00 206-610-013 $200.00 206-610-014 $200.00 206-610-015 $200.00 206-610-016 $200.00 206-610-017 $200.00 206-610-018 $200.00 206-610-019 $200.00 206-610-020 $200.00 206-610-021 $200.00 206-610-022 $200.00 206-610-023 $200.00 206-610-024 $200.00 206-610-025 $200.00 206-610-026 $200.00 206-610-027 $200.00 98 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 70 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2885 M2 LEVY CODE: Intervening Properties Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-610-028 $200.00 206-610-029 $200.00 206-610-030 $200.00 206-610-031 $200.00 206-610-032 $200.00 206-610-033 $200.00 206-610-034 $200.00 206-610-035 $200.00 206-610-036 $200.00 206-610-037 $200.00 206-610-038 $200.00 206-610-039 $200.00 206-620-001 $200.00 206-620-002 $200.00 206-620-003 $200.00 206-620-004 $200.00 206-620-005 $200.00 206-620-006 $200.00 206-620-007 $200.00 206-620-008 $200.00 206-620-009 $200.00 206-620-010 $200.00 206-620-011 $200.00 206-620-012 $200.00 206-620-013 $200.00 206-620-014 $200.00 206-620-015 $200.00 206-620-016 $200.00 206-620-017 $200.00 206-620-018 $200.00 206-620-019 $200.00 206-620-020 $200.00 206-620-022 $200.00 206-620-023 $200.00 206-620-024 $200.00 206-620-025 $200.00 206-620-026 $200.00 206-620-027 $200.00 206-620-028 $200.00 206-620-029 $200.00 206-620-030 $200.00 206-620-031 $200.00 206-620-032 $200.00 206-620-033 $200.00 206-620-034 $200.00 206-620-035 $200.00 206-620-036 $200.00 206-620-037 $200.00 206-620-038 $200.00 206-620-039 $200.00 206-620-040 $200.00 206-620-041 $200.00 206-620-042 $200.00 206-620-043 $200.00 206-620-044 $200.00 206-620-045 $200.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-620-046 $200.00 206-620-047 $200.00 206-620-048 $200.00 206-620-049 $200.00 206-620-050 $200.00 206-620-051 $200.00 206-620-052 $200.00 206-620-053 $200.00 206-620-054 $200.00 206-620-055 $200.00 206-620-056 $200.00 206-620-058 $200.00 206-630-001 $200.00 206-630-002 $200.00 206-630-003 $200.00 206-630-004 $200.00 206-630-005 $200.00 206-630-006 $200.00 206-630-007 $200.00 206-630-008 $200.00 206-630-009 $200.00 206-630-010 $200.00 206-630-011 $200.00 206-630-012 $200.00 206-630-013 $200.00 206-630-014 $200.00 206-630-015 $200.00 206-630-016 $200.00 206-630-017 $200.00 206-630-018 $200.00 206-630-019 $200.00 206-630-020 $200.00 206-630-021 $200.00 206-630-022 $200.00 206-630-023 $200.00 206-630-024 $200.00 206-630-025 $200.00 206-630-026 $200.00 206-630-027 $200.00 206-630-028 $200.00 206-630-029 $200.00 206-630-030 $200.00 206-630-031 $200.00 206-630-032 $200.00 206-630-033 $200.00 206-630-034 $200.00 206-630-035 $200.00 206-630-036 $200.00 206-630-037 $200.00 206-630-038 $200.00 206-630-039 $200.00 206-630-040 $200.00 206-630-041 $200.00 206-630-042 $200.00 206-630-043 $200.00 206-630-044 $200.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-630-045 $200.00 206-630-046 $200.00 206-630-047 $200.00 206-630-048 $200.00 206-630-049 $200.00 206-630-050 $200.00 206-630-051 $200.00 206-630-052 $200.00 206-640-001 $200.00 206-640-002 $200.00 206-640-003 $200.00 206-640-004 $200.00 206-640-005 $200.00 206-640-006 $200.00 206-640-007 $200.00 206-640-008 $200.00 206-640-009 $200.00 206-640-010 $200.00 206-640-011 $200.00 206-640-012 $200.00 206-640-013 $200.00 206-640-014 $200.00 206-640-015 $200.00 206-640-016 $200.00 206-640-017 $200.00 206-640-018 $200.00 206-640-019 $200.00 206-640-020 $200.00 206-640-021 $200.00 206-640-022 $200.00 206-640-023 $200.00 206-640-024 $200.00 206-640-025 $200.00 206-640-026 $200.00 206-640-027 $200.00 206-640-028 $200.00 206-640-029 $200.00 206-640-030 $200.00 206-640-031 $200.00 206-640-032 $200.00 206-640-033 $200.00 206-640-034 $200.00 206-640-035 $200.00 379Total Parcels: $85,200.00 Total Assessment: 99 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 71 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2886 MG LEVY CODE: Diablo Vista Ballfields Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-030-085 $9,206.10 206-580-001 $115.80 206-580-002 $115.80 206-580-003 $115.80 206-580-004 $115.80 206-580-005 $115.80 206-580-006 $115.80 206-580-007 $115.80 206-580-008 $115.80 206-580-009 $115.80 206-580-010 $115.80 206-580-011 $115.80 206-580-012 $115.80 206-580-013 $115.80 206-580-014 $115.80 206-580-015 $115.80 206-580-016 $115.80 206-580-017 $115.80 206-580-018 $115.80 206-580-019 $115.80 206-580-020 $115.80 206-580-021 $115.80 206-580-022 $115.80 206-580-023 $115.80 206-580-024 $115.80 206-580-025 $115.80 206-580-026 $115.80 206-580-027 $115.80 206-580-028 $115.80 206-580-029 $115.80 206-580-030 $115.80 206-580-031 $115.80 206-580-032 $115.80 206-580-033 $115.80 206-580-034 $115.80 206-580-035 $115.80 206-590-001 $115.80 206-590-002 $115.80 206-590-003 $115.80 206-590-004 $115.80 206-590-005 $115.80 206-590-006 $115.80 206-590-007 $115.80 206-590-008 $115.80 206-590-009 $115.80 206-590-010 $115.80 206-590-011 $115.80 206-590-012 $115.80 206-590-013 $115.80 206-590-014 $115.80 206-590-015 $115.80 206-590-016 $115.80 206-590-017 $115.80 206-590-018 $115.80 206-590-019 $115.80 206-590-020 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-590-021 $115.80 206-590-022 $115.80 206-590-023 $115.80 206-590-024 $115.80 206-590-025 $115.80 206-590-026 $115.80 206-590-027 $115.80 206-590-028 $115.80 206-590-029 $115.80 206-590-030 $115.80 206-590-031 $115.80 206-590-032 $115.80 206-590-033 $115.80 206-590-034 $115.80 206-590-035 $115.80 206-590-036 $115.80 206-590-037 $115.80 206-590-038 $115.80 206-590-039 $115.80 206-590-040 $115.80 206-590-041 $115.80 206-590-042 $115.80 206-590-043 $115.80 206-590-044 $115.80 206-590-045 $115.80 206-590-046 $115.80 206-590-047 $115.80 206-590-048 $115.80 206-590-049 $115.80 206-590-050 $115.80 206-590-051 $115.80 206-590-052 $115.80 206-590-053 $115.80 206-590-054 $115.80 206-590-055 $115.80 206-590-056 $115.80 206-590-057 $115.80 206-590-058 $115.80 206-590-059 $115.80 206-590-060 $115.80 206-590-061 $115.80 206-590-062 $115.80 206-590-063 $115.80 206-590-064 $115.80 206-590-065 $115.80 206-590-066 $115.80 206-590-067 $115.80 206-590-068 $115.80 206-590-069 $115.80 206-590-070 $115.80 206-590-071 $115.80 206-590-072 $115.80 206-590-073 $115.80 206-590-074 $115.80 206-590-075 $115.80 206-590-076 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-590-077 $115.80 206-590-078 $115.80 206-590-079 $115.80 206-590-080 $115.80 206-590-081 $115.80 206-590-082 $115.80 206-590-083 $115.80 206-590-084 $115.80 206-590-085 $115.80 206-590-086 $115.80 206-590-087 $115.80 206-590-088 $115.80 206-590-089 $115.80 206-590-090 $115.80 206-600-001 $115.80 206-600-002 $115.80 206-600-003 $115.80 206-600-004 $115.80 206-600-005 $115.80 206-600-006 $115.80 206-600-007 $115.80 206-600-008 $115.80 206-600-009 $115.80 206-600-010 $115.80 206-600-011 $115.80 206-600-012 $115.80 206-600-013 $115.80 206-600-014 $115.80 206-600-015 $115.80 206-600-016 $115.80 206-600-017 $115.80 206-600-018 $115.80 206-600-019 $115.80 206-600-020 $115.80 206-600-021 $115.80 206-600-022 $115.80 206-600-023 $115.80 206-600-024 $115.80 206-600-025 $115.80 206-600-026 $115.80 206-600-027 $115.80 206-600-028 $115.80 206-600-029 $115.80 206-600-030 $115.80 206-600-031 $115.80 206-600-032 $115.80 206-600-033 $115.80 206-600-034 $115.80 206-600-035 $115.80 206-600-036 $115.80 206-600-037 $115.80 206-600-038 $115.80 206-600-039 $115.80 206-600-040 $115.80 206-600-041 $115.80 206-600-042 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-600-043 $115.80 206-600-044 $115.80 206-600-045 $115.80 206-600-046 $115.80 206-600-047 $115.80 206-600-048 $115.80 206-600-049 $115.80 206-600-050 $115.80 206-600-051 $115.80 206-600-052 $115.80 206-600-053 $115.80 206-600-054 $115.80 206-600-055 $115.80 206-600-056 $115.80 206-600-057 $115.80 206-600-058 $115.80 206-600-059 $115.80 206-600-060 $115.80 206-600-061 $115.80 206-600-062 $115.80 206-600-063 $115.80 206-600-064 $115.80 206-600-065 $115.80 206-600-066 $115.80 206-600-067 $115.80 206-600-068 $115.80 206-600-069 $115.80 206-600-070 $115.80 206-600-071 $115.80 206-610-001 $115.80 206-610-002 $115.80 206-610-003 $115.80 206-610-004 $115.80 206-610-005 $115.80 206-610-006 $115.80 206-610-007 $115.80 206-610-008 $115.80 206-610-009 $115.80 206-610-010 $115.80 206-610-011 $115.80 206-610-012 $115.80 206-610-013 $115.80 206-610-014 $115.80 206-610-015 $115.80 206-610-016 $115.80 206-610-017 $115.80 206-610-018 $115.80 206-610-019 $115.80 206-610-020 $115.80 206-610-021 $115.80 206-610-022 $115.80 206-610-023 $115.80 206-610-024 $115.80 206-610-025 $115.80 206-610-026 $115.80 206-610-027 $115.80 100 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 71 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2886 MG LEVY CODE: Diablo Vista Ballfields Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-610-028 $115.80 206-610-029 $115.80 206-610-030 $115.80 206-610-031 $115.80 206-610-032 $115.80 206-610-033 $115.80 206-610-034 $115.80 206-610-035 $115.80 206-610-036 $115.80 206-610-037 $115.80 206-610-038 $115.80 206-610-039 $115.80 206-620-001 $115.80 206-620-002 $115.80 206-620-003 $115.80 206-620-004 $115.80 206-620-005 $115.80 206-620-006 $115.80 206-620-007 $115.80 206-620-008 $115.80 206-620-009 $115.80 206-620-010 $115.80 206-620-011 $115.80 206-620-012 $115.80 206-620-013 $115.80 206-620-014 $115.80 206-620-015 $115.80 206-620-016 $115.80 206-620-017 $115.80 206-620-018 $115.80 206-620-019 $115.80 206-620-020 $115.80 206-620-022 $115.80 206-620-023 $115.80 206-620-024 $115.80 206-620-025 $115.80 206-620-026 $115.80 206-620-027 $115.80 206-620-028 $115.80 206-620-029 $115.80 206-620-030 $115.80 206-620-031 $115.80 206-620-032 $115.80 206-620-033 $115.80 206-620-034 $115.80 206-620-035 $115.80 206-620-036 $115.80 206-620-037 $115.80 206-620-038 $115.80 206-620-039 $115.80 206-620-040 $115.80 206-620-041 $115.80 206-620-042 $115.80 206-620-043 $115.80 206-620-044 $115.80 206-620-045 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-620-046 $115.80 206-620-047 $115.80 206-620-048 $115.80 206-620-049 $115.80 206-620-050 $115.80 206-620-051 $115.80 206-620-052 $115.80 206-620-053 $115.80 206-620-054 $115.80 206-620-055 $115.80 206-620-056 $115.80 206-620-058 $115.80 206-630-001 $115.80 206-630-002 $115.80 206-630-003 $115.80 206-630-004 $115.80 206-630-005 $115.80 206-630-006 $115.80 206-630-007 $115.80 206-630-008 $115.80 206-630-009 $115.80 206-630-010 $115.80 206-630-011 $115.80 206-630-012 $115.80 206-630-013 $115.80 206-630-014 $115.80 206-630-015 $115.80 206-630-016 $115.80 206-630-017 $115.80 206-630-018 $115.80 206-630-019 $115.80 206-630-020 $115.80 206-630-021 $115.80 206-630-022 $115.80 206-630-023 $115.80 206-630-024 $115.80 206-630-025 $115.80 206-630-026 $115.80 206-630-027 $115.80 206-630-028 $115.80 206-630-029 $115.80 206-630-030 $115.80 206-630-031 $115.80 206-630-032 $115.80 206-630-033 $115.80 206-630-034 $115.80 206-630-035 $115.80 206-630-036 $115.80 206-630-037 $115.80 206-630-038 $115.80 206-630-039 $115.80 206-630-040 $115.80 206-630-041 $115.80 206-630-042 $115.80 206-630-043 $115.80 206-630-044 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-630-045 $115.80 206-630-046 $115.80 206-630-047 $115.80 206-630-048 $115.80 206-630-049 $115.80 206-630-050 $115.80 206-630-051 $115.80 206-630-052 $115.80 206-640-001 $115.80 206-640-002 $115.80 206-640-003 $115.80 206-640-004 $115.80 206-640-005 $115.80 206-640-006 $115.80 206-640-007 $115.80 206-640-008 $115.80 206-640-009 $115.80 206-640-010 $115.80 206-640-011 $115.80 206-640-012 $115.80 206-640-013 $115.80 206-640-014 $115.80 206-640-015 $115.80 206-640-016 $115.80 206-640-017 $115.80 206-640-018 $115.80 206-640-019 $115.80 206-640-020 $115.80 206-640-021 $115.80 206-640-022 $115.80 206-640-023 $115.80 206-640-024 $115.80 206-640-025 $115.80 206-640-026 $115.80 206-640-027 $115.80 206-640-028 $115.80 206-640-029 $115.80 206-640-030 $115.80 206-640-031 $115.80 206-640-032 $115.80 206-640-033 $115.80 206-640-034 $115.80 206-640-035 $115.80 206-660-001 $115.80 206-660-002 $115.80 206-660-003 $115.80 206-660-004 $115.80 206-660-005 $115.80 206-660-006 $115.80 206-660-007 $115.80 206-660-008 $115.80 206-660-009 $115.80 206-660-010 $115.80 206-660-011 $115.80 206-660-012 $115.80 206-660-013 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-660-014 $115.80 206-660-015 $115.80 206-660-016 $115.80 206-660-017 $115.80 206-660-018 $115.80 206-660-019 $115.80 206-660-020 $115.80 206-660-021 $115.80 206-660-022 $115.80 206-660-023 $115.80 206-660-024 $115.80 206-660-025 $115.80 206-660-026 $115.80 206-660-027 $115.80 206-660-028 $115.80 206-660-029 $115.80 206-660-030 $115.80 206-660-031 $115.80 206-660-032 $115.80 206-660-033 $115.80 206-660-034 $115.80 206-660-035 $115.80 206-660-036 $115.80 206-660-037 $115.80 206-660-038 $115.80 206-660-039 $115.80 206-660-040 $115.80 206-660-041 $115.80 206-660-042 $115.80 206-660-043 $115.80 206-660-044 $115.80 206-660-045 $115.80 206-660-046 $115.80 206-660-047 $115.80 206-660-048 $115.80 206-660-049 $115.80 206-660-050 $115.80 206-670-001 $115.80 206-670-002 $115.80 206-670-003 $115.80 206-670-004 $115.80 206-670-005 $115.80 206-670-006 $115.80 206-670-007 $115.80 206-670-008 $115.80 206-670-009 $115.80 206-670-010 $115.80 206-670-011 $115.80 206-670-012 $115.80 206-670-013 $115.80 206-670-014 $115.80 206-670-015 $115.80 206-670-016 $115.80 206-670-017 $115.80 206-670-018 $115.80 206-670-019 $115.80 101 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 71 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2886 MG LEVY CODE: Diablo Vista Ballfields Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-670-020 $115.80 206-670-021 $115.80 206-670-022 $115.80 206-670-023 $115.80 206-670-024 $115.80 206-670-025 $115.80 206-670-026 $115.80 206-670-027 $115.80 206-670-028 $115.80 206-670-029 $115.80 206-670-030 $115.80 206-670-031 $115.80 206-670-032 $115.80 206-670-033 $115.80 206-670-034 $115.80 206-670-035 $115.80 206-670-036 $115.80 206-670-037 $115.80 206-670-038 $115.80 206-670-039 $115.80 206-670-040 $115.80 206-670-041 $115.80 206-670-042 $115.80 206-670-043 $115.80 206-670-044 $115.80 206-670-045 $115.80 206-670-046 $115.80 206-670-047 $115.80 206-670-048 $115.80 206-670-049 $115.80 206-670-050 $115.80 206-680-001 $115.80 206-680-002 $115.80 206-680-003 $115.80 206-680-004 $115.80 206-680-005 $115.80 206-680-006 $115.80 206-680-007 $115.80 206-680-008 $115.80 206-680-009 $115.80 206-680-010 $115.80 206-680-011 $115.80 206-680-012 $115.80 206-680-013 $115.80 206-680-014 $115.80 206-680-015 $115.80 206-680-016 $115.80 206-680-017 $115.80 206-680-018 $115.80 206-680-019 $115.80 206-680-020 $115.80 206-710-001 $115.80 206-710-002 $115.80 206-710-003 $115.80 206-710-004 $115.80 206-710-005 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-710-006 $115.80 206-710-007 $115.80 206-710-008 $115.80 206-710-009 $115.80 206-710-010 $115.80 206-710-011 $115.80 206-710-012 $115.80 206-710-013 $115.80 206-710-014 $115.80 206-710-015 $115.80 206-710-016 $115.80 206-710-017 $115.80 206-710-018 $115.80 206-710-019 $115.80 206-710-020 $115.80 206-710-021 $115.80 206-710-022 $115.80 206-710-023 $115.80 206-710-024 $115.80 206-710-025 $115.80 206-710-026 $115.80 206-710-027 $115.80 206-710-028 $115.80 206-710-029 $115.80 206-710-030 $115.80 206-710-031 $115.80 206-710-032 $115.80 206-710-033 $115.80 206-710-034 $115.80 206-710-035 $115.80 206-710-036 $115.80 206-710-037 $115.80 206-710-038 $115.80 206-710-039 $115.80 206-710-040 $115.80 206-710-041 $115.80 206-710-042 $115.80 206-710-043 $115.80 206-710-044 $115.80 206-710-045 $115.80 206-710-046 $115.80 206-710-047 $115.80 206-710-048 $115.80 206-710-049 $115.80 206-710-050 $115.80 206-710-051 $115.80 206-710-052 $115.80 206-710-053 $115.80 206-710-054 $115.80 206-710-055 $115.80 206-710-056 $115.80 206-710-057 $115.80 206-710-058 $115.80 206-710-059 $115.80 206-710-060 $115.80 206-720-001 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-720-002 $115.80 206-720-003 $115.80 206-720-004 $115.80 206-720-005 $115.80 206-720-006 $115.80 206-720-007 $115.80 206-720-008 $115.80 206-720-009 $115.80 206-720-010 $115.80 206-720-011 $115.80 206-720-012 $115.80 206-720-013 $115.80 206-720-014 $115.80 206-720-015 $115.80 206-720-016 $115.80 206-720-017 $115.80 206-720-018 $115.80 206-720-019 $115.80 206-720-020 $115.80 206-720-021 $115.80 206-720-022 $115.80 206-720-023 $115.80 206-720-024 $115.80 206-720-025 $115.80 206-720-026 $115.80 206-720-027 $115.80 206-720-028 $115.80 206-720-029 $115.80 206-720-030 $115.80 206-720-031 $115.80 206-720-032 $115.80 206-720-033 $115.80 206-720-034 $115.80 206-720-035 $115.80 206-720-036 $115.80 206-720-037 $115.80 206-720-038 $115.80 206-720-039 $115.80 206-720-040 $115.80 206-720-041 $115.80 206-720-042 $115.80 206-720-043 $115.80 206-720-044 $115.80 206-720-045 $115.80 206-720-046 $115.80 206-720-047 $115.80 206-720-048 $115.80 206-720-049 $115.80 206-720-050 $115.80 206-720-051 $115.80 206-720-052 $115.80 206-720-053 $115.80 206-720-054 $115.80 206-720-055 $115.80 206-720-056 $115.80 206-720-057 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-720-058 $115.80 206-720-059 $115.80 206-720-060 $115.80 206-720-061 $115.80 206-720-062 $115.80 206-720-063 $115.80 206-720-064 $115.80 206-720-065 $115.80 206-720-066 $115.80 206-720-067 $115.80 206-720-068 $115.80 206-720-069 $115.80 206-720-070 $115.80 206-720-071 $115.80 206-720-072 $115.80 206-720-073 $115.80 206-720-074 $115.80 206-720-075 $115.80 206-720-076 $115.80 206-720-077 $115.80 206-720-078 $115.80 206-730-001 $115.80 206-730-002 $115.80 206-730-003 $115.80 206-730-004 $115.80 206-730-005 $115.80 206-730-006 $115.80 206-730-007 $115.80 206-730-008 $115.80 206-730-009 $115.80 206-730-010 $115.80 206-730-011 $115.80 206-730-012 $115.80 206-730-013 $115.80 206-730-014 $115.80 206-730-015 $115.80 206-730-016 $115.80 206-730-017 $115.80 206-730-018 $115.80 206-730-019 $115.80 206-730-020 $115.80 206-730-021 $115.80 206-730-022 $115.80 206-730-023 $115.80 206-730-024 $115.80 206-730-025 $115.80 206-730-026 $115.80 206-730-030 $115.80 206-730-031 $115.80 206-730-032 $115.80 206-730-033 $115.80 206-730-034 $115.80 206-730-035 $115.80 206-730-036 $115.80 206-730-037 $115.80 206-730-038 $115.80 102 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 71 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2886 MG LEVY CODE: Diablo Vista Ballfields Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-730-039 $115.80 206-730-040 $115.80 206-730-041 $115.80 206-730-042 $115.80 206-730-043 $115.80 206-730-044 $115.80 206-730-045 $115.80 206-730-046 $115.80 206-730-047 $115.80 206-730-048 $115.80 206-730-049 $115.80 206-730-050 $115.80 206-730-051 $115.80 206-730-052 $115.80 206-740-001 $115.80 206-740-002 $115.80 206-740-003 $115.80 206-740-004 $115.80 206-740-005 $115.80 206-740-006 $115.80 206-740-007 $115.80 206-740-008 $115.80 206-740-009 $115.80 206-740-010 $115.80 206-740-011 $115.80 206-740-012 $115.80 206-740-013 $115.80 206-740-014 $115.80 206-740-015 $115.80 206-740-016 $115.80 206-740-017 $115.80 206-740-018 $115.80 206-740-019 $115.80 206-740-020 $115.80 206-740-021 $115.80 206-740-022 $115.80 206-740-023 $115.80 206-740-024 $115.80 206-740-025 $115.80 206-740-026 $115.80 206-740-027 $115.80 206-740-028 $115.80 206-740-029 $115.80 206-750-001 $115.80 206-750-002 $115.80 206-750-003 $115.80 206-750-004 $115.80 206-750-005 $115.80 206-750-006 $115.80 206-750-007 $115.80 206-750-008 $115.80 206-750-009 $115.80 206-750-010 $115.80 206-750-011 $115.80 206-750-012 $115.80 206-750-013 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-750-014 $115.80 206-750-015 $115.80 206-750-016 $115.80 206-750-017 $115.80 206-750-018 $115.80 206-750-019 $115.80 206-750-020 $115.80 206-750-021 $115.80 206-750-022 $115.80 206-750-023 $115.80 206-750-024 $115.80 206-750-025 $115.80 206-750-026 $115.80 206-750-027 $115.80 206-750-028 $115.80 206-750-029 $115.80 206-750-030 $115.80 206-750-031 $115.80 206-750-032 $115.80 206-750-033 $115.80 206-750-034 $115.80 206-750-035 $115.80 206-750-036 $115.80 206-750-037 $115.80 206-750-038 $115.80 206-750-039 $115.80 206-750-040 $115.80 206-750-041 $115.80 206-750-042 $115.80 206-750-043 $115.80 206-750-044 $115.80 206-750-045 $115.80 206-750-046 $115.80 206-750-047 $115.80 206-750-048 $115.80 206-750-049 $115.80 206-750-050 $115.80 206-750-051 $115.80 206-750-052 $115.80 206-750-053 $115.80 206-750-054 $115.80 206-750-055 $115.80 206-750-056 $115.80 206-750-057 $115.80 206-750-058 $115.80 206-750-059 $115.80 206-750-060 $115.80 206-750-061 $115.80 206-750-062 $115.80 206-750-063 $115.80 206-750-064 $115.80 206-750-065 $115.80 206-750-066 $115.80 206-750-067 $115.80 206-750-068 $115.80 206-750-069 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-750-070 $115.80 206-750-071 $115.80 206-750-072 $115.80 206-750-073 $115.80 206-750-074 $115.80 206-750-075 $115.80 206-750-076 $115.80 206-750-077 $115.80 206-750-078 $115.80 206-750-079 $115.80 206-750-080 $115.80 206-750-081 $115.80 206-750-082 $115.80 206-750-083 $115.80 206-750-084 $115.80 206-750-085 $115.80 206-750-086 $115.80 206-750-087 $115.80 206-750-088 $115.80 206-750-089 $115.80 206-750-090 $115.80 206-760-001 $115.80 206-760-002 $115.80 206-760-003 $115.80 206-760-004 $115.80 206-760-005 $115.80 206-760-006 $57.90 206-760-007 $115.80 206-760-008 $115.80 206-760-009 $115.80 206-760-010 $57.90 206-760-011 $115.80 206-760-012 $115.80 206-760-013 $115.80 206-760-014 $57.90 206-760-015 $115.80 206-760-016 $115.80 206-760-017 $115.80 206-760-018 $57.90 206-760-019 $115.80 206-760-020 $115.80 206-760-021 $115.80 206-770-001 $115.80 206-770-002 $115.80 206-770-003 $115.80 206-770-004 $115.80 206-770-005 $115.80 206-770-006 $115.80 206-770-007 $57.90 206-770-008 $115.80 206-770-009 $115.80 206-770-010 $115.80 206-770-011 $57.90 206-770-012 $115.80 206-770-013 $115.80 206-770-014 $57.90 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-770-015 $115.80 206-770-016 $115.80 206-770-017 $115.80 206-770-018 $115.80 206-770-019 $115.80 206-770-020 $115.80 206-770-021 $115.80 206-770-022 $57.90 206-770-023 $115.80 206-770-024 $57.90 206-770-025 $115.80 206-770-026 $57.90 206-770-027 $115.80 206-780-001 $115.80 206-780-002 $57.90 206-780-003 $57.90 206-780-004 $57.90 206-780-005 $57.90 206-780-006 $57.90 206-780-007 $57.90 206-780-008 $57.90 206-780-009 $57.90 206-780-010 $57.90 206-780-011 $57.90 206-780-012 $57.90 206-780-013 $57.90 206-780-014 $57.90 206-780-015 $57.90 206-780-016 $57.90 206-780-017 $57.90 206-780-018 $57.90 206-790-001 $57.90 206-790-002 $57.90 206-790-003 $57.90 206-790-004 $57.90 206-790-005 $115.80 206-790-006 $57.90 206-790-007 $57.90 206-790-008 $57.90 206-790-009 $57.90 206-790-010 $57.90 206-790-011 $57.90 206-790-012 $115.80 206-790-013 $115.80 206-790-014 $115.80 206-790-015 $57.90 206-790-016 $57.90 206-790-017 $57.90 206-790-018 $57.90 206-790-019 $57.90 206-790-020 $57.90 206-790-021 $57.90 206-790-022 $57.90 206-790-023 $57.90 206-790-024 $57.90 206-790-025 $115.80 103 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 71 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2886 MG LEVY CODE: Diablo Vista Ballfields Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-790-026 $57.90 206-790-027 $57.90 206-790-028 $57.90 206-790-029 $57.90 206-800-001 $57.90 206-800-002 $57.90 206-800-003 $115.80 206-800-004 $115.80 206-800-005 $115.80 206-800-006 $115.80 206-800-007 $115.80 206-800-008 $115.80 206-800-009 $115.80 206-800-010 $115.80 206-800-011 $115.80 206-800-012 $115.80 206-800-013 $115.80 206-800-014 $115.80 206-800-015 $115.80 206-800-016 $115.80 206-800-017 $115.80 206-800-018 $115.80 206-800-019 $115.80 206-800-020 $115.80 206-800-021 $115.80 206-800-022 $115.80 206-800-023 $115.80 206-800-024 $115.80 206-800-025 $115.80 206-800-026 $115.80 206-800-027 $115.80 206-800-028 $115.80 206-800-029 $115.80 206-800-030 $115.80 206-800-031 $115.80 206-800-032 $115.80 206-800-033 $115.80 206-800-034 $115.80 206-800-035 $115.80 206-800-036 $115.80 206-800-037 $115.80 206-800-038 $115.80 206-800-039 $115.80 206-800-040 $115.80 206-800-041 $115.80 206-800-042 $115.80 206-800-043 $115.80 206-800-044 $115.80 206-800-045 $115.80 206-800-046 $57.90 206-800-047 $57.90 206-800-048 $57.90 206-800-049 $57.90 206-800-050 $57.90 206-800-051 $115.80 206-800-052 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-800-053 $115.80 206-800-054 $57.90 206-800-055 $57.90 206-800-056 $57.90 206-800-057 $115.80 206-800-058 $115.80 206-800-059 $115.80 206-800-060 $115.80 206-800-061 $115.80 206-800-062 $115.80 206-800-063 $115.80 206-800-064 $115.80 206-800-065 $115.80 206-800-066 $115.80 206-800-067 $115.80 206-810-001 $115.80 206-810-002 $115.80 206-810-003 $115.80 206-810-004 $115.80 206-810-005 $115.80 206-810-006 $115.80 206-810-007 $115.80 206-810-008 $115.80 206-810-009 $115.80 206-810-010 $115.80 206-810-011 $115.80 206-810-012 $115.80 206-810-013 $115.80 206-810-014 $115.80 206-810-015 $115.80 206-810-016 $115.80 206-810-017 $115.80 206-810-018 $115.80 206-810-019 $115.80 206-810-020 $115.80 206-810-021 $115.80 206-810-022 $115.80 206-810-023 $115.80 206-810-024 $115.80 206-810-025 $115.80 206-810-026 $115.80 206-810-027 $115.80 206-810-028 $115.80 206-810-029 $115.80 206-810-030 $115.80 206-810-031 $115.80 206-820-001 $115.80 206-820-002 $115.80 206-820-003 $115.80 206-820-004 $115.80 206-820-005 $115.80 206-820-006 $115.80 206-820-007 $115.80 206-820-008 $115.80 206-820-009 $115.80 206-820-010 $115.80 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 206-820-011 $115.80 206-820-012 $115.80 206-820-013 $115.80 206-820-014 $115.80 206-820-015 $115.80 206-820-016 $115.80 206-820-017 $115.80 206-820-018 $115.80 206-820-019 $115.80 206-820-020 $115.80 206-820-021 $115.80 206-820-022 $115.80 206-820-023 $57.90 206-820-024 $57.90 206-820-025 $57.90 206-820-026 $115.80 206-820-027 $115.80 206-820-028 $115.80 206-820-029 $115.80 206-820-030 $115.80 206-820-031 $57.90 206-820-032 $57.90 206-820-033 $57.90 206-820-034 $57.90 206-820-035 $57.90 206-820-036 $115.80 206-820-037 $57.90 206-820-038 $57.90 206-820-039 $57.90 206-820-040 $57.90 206-820-041 $57.90 206-820-042 $57.90 206-820-043 $57.90 206-820-044 $57.90 206-820-045 $57.90 206-820-046 $57.90 206-820-047 $57.90 206-820-048 $57.90 206-820-049 $57.90 206-820-050 $57.90 206-820-051 $115.80 206-820-052 $115.80 206-820-053 $57.90 206-820-054 $57.90 206-820-055 $115.80 206-820-056 $115.80 206-820-057 $115.80 206-820-058 $115.80 206-820-059 $115.80 206-820-060 $115.80 206-820-061 $115.80 1059Total Parcels: $126,801.00 Total Assessment: 104 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 74 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2875 NM LEVY CODE: Bella Flora Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 408-160-016 $1,360.00 408-170-072 $170.00 408-180-010 $170.00 408-240-001 $340.00 408-240-002 $340.00 408-240-003 $340.00 408-240-004 $340.00 408-240-005 $340.00 408-240-006 $340.00 408-240-007 $340.00 408-240-008 $340.00 408-240-009 $340.00 408-240-010 $340.00 408-240-011 $340.00 408-240-012 $340.00 408-240-013 $340.00 408-240-014 $340.00 408-240-015 $340.00 408-240-016 $340.00 408-240-017 $340.00 408-240-018 $340.00 408-240-019 $340.00 408-240-020 $340.00 408-240-021 $340.00 408-240-022 $340.00 408-240-023 $340.00 408-240-024 $340.00 408-240-025 $340.00 408-240-026 $340.00 408-240-027 $340.00 408-240-028 $340.00 408-240-029 $340.00 408-240-030 $340.00 408-240-031 $340.00 408-240-032 $340.00 408-240-033 $340.00 408-240-034 $340.00 408-240-035 $340.00 408-240-036 $340.00 408-240-037 $340.00 408-240-038 $340.00 408-240-039 $340.00 408-240-040 $340.00 408-240-041 $340.00 408-240-042 $340.00 408-240-043 $340.00 408-240-044 $340.00 408-240-045 $340.00 408-240-046 $340.00 408-240-047 $340.00 408-240-048 $340.00 408-240-049 $340.00 408-240-050 $340.00 408-240-051 $340.00 408-240-052 $340.00 408-240-053 $340.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 408-240-054 $340.00 408-240-055 $340.00 408-240-056 $340.00 408-240-057 $340.00 408-240-058 $340.00 408-240-059 $340.00 408-240-060 $340.00 408-240-061 $340.00 408-240-062 $340.00 408-240-063 $340.00 408-240-064 $340.00 408-240-065 $340.00 408-240-066 $340.00 408-240-067 $340.00 408-240-068 $340.00 408-240-069 $340.00 408-240-070 $340.00 408-240-071 $340.00 408-240-072 $340.00 408-240-073 $340.00 408-240-074 $340.00 408-240-075 $340.00 408-240-076 $340.00 408-240-077 $340.00 408-240-078 $340.00 408-240-079 $340.00 408-240-080 $340.00 408-240-081 $340.00 408-240-082 $340.00 408-240-083 $340.00 408-240-084 $340.00 408-240-085 $340.00 408-240-086 $340.00 408-240-087 $340.00 408-240-088 $340.00 408-240-089 $340.00 408-240-090 $340.00 408-240-091 $340.00 408-240-092 $340.00 408-240-093 $340.00 408-240-094 $340.00 408-250-001 $340.00 408-250-002 $340.00 408-250-003 $340.00 408-250-004 $340.00 408-250-005 $340.00 408-250-006 $340.00 408-250-007 $340.00 408-250-008 $340.00 408-250-009 $340.00 408-250-010 $340.00 408-250-011 $340.00 408-250-012 $340.00 408-250-013 $340.00 408-250-014 $340.00 408-250-015 $340.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 408-250-016 $340.00 408-250-017 $340.00 408-250-018 $340.00 408-250-019 $340.00 408-250-020 $340.00 408-250-021 $340.00 408-250-022 $340.00 408-250-023 $340.00 408-250-024 $340.00 408-250-025 $340.00 408-250-026 $340.00 408-250-027 $340.00 408-250-028 $340.00 408-250-029 $340.00 408-250-030 $340.00 408-250-031 $340.00 408-250-032 $340.00 408-250-033 $340.00 408-250-034 $340.00 408-250-035 $340.00 408-250-036 $340.00 408-250-037 $340.00 408-250-038 $340.00 408-250-039 $340.00 408-250-040 $340.00 408-250-041 $340.00 408-250-042 $340.00 408-250-043 $340.00 408-250-044 $340.00 408-250-045 $340.00 408-250-046 $340.00 408-250-047 $340.00 408-250-048 $340.00 408-250-049 $340.00 408-250-050 $340.00 408-250-051 $340.00 408-250-052 $340.00 408-250-053 $340.00 408-250-054 $340.00 408-250-055 $340.00 408-250-056 $340.00 408-250-057 $340.00 408-250-058 $340.00 408-250-059 $340.00 408-250-060 $340.00 408-250-061 $340.00 408-250-062 $340.00 408-250-063 $340.00 408-250-064 $340.00 408-250-065 $340.00 408-250-066 $340.00 408-250-067 $340.00 408-250-068 $340.00 408-250-069 $340.00 408-250-070 $340.00 408-250-071 $340.00 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 408-250-072 $340.00 408-250-073 $340.00 408-250-074 $340.00 408-250-075 $340.00 408-250-076 $340.00 408-250-077 $340.00 408-250-078 $340.00 408-250-079 $340.00 176Total Parcels: $60,520.00 Total Assessment: 105 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COUNTYWIDE LANDSCAPING DISTRICT A.D. 1979-3 (LL-2) FUND NO: LL2 ZONE 75 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 2889 N5 LEVY CODE: Belmont Terrace Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 159-230-009 $5.00 159-230-010 $5.00 159-510-001 $3.74 159-510-002 $3.74 159-510-003 $3.74 159-510-004 $3.74 159-510-005 $3.74 159-510-006 $3.74 159-510-007 $3.74 159-510-008 $3.74 159-510-009 $3.74 159-510-010 $3.74 159-510-011 $3.74 159-510-012 $3.74 159-510-013 $3.74 159-510-014 $3.74 159-510-015 $3.74 159-510-016 $3.74 159-510-017 $3.74 159-510-018 $3.74 159-510-019 $3.74 159-510-020 $3.74 159-510-021 $3.74 159-510-022 $3.74 159-510-023 $3.74 159-510-024 $3.74 159-510-025 $3.74 159-510-026 $3.74 159-510-027 $3.74 159-510-028 $3.74 159-510-029 $3.74 159-510-030 $3.74 159-510-031 $3.74 159-510-032 $3.74 159-510-033 $3.74 159-510-034 $3.74 159-510-035 $3.74 159-510-036 $3.74 159-510-037 $3.74 159-510-038 $3.74 159-510-039 $3.74 159-510-040 $3.74 159-510-041 $3.74 159-510-042 $3.74 159-510-043 $3.74 159-510-044 $3.74 159-510-045 $3.74 159-510-046 $3.74 159-510-047 $3.74 159-520-001 $3.74 159-520-002 $3.74 159-520-003 $3.74 159-520-004 $3.74 159-520-005 $3.74 159-520-006 $3.74 159-520-007 $3.74 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 159-520-008 $3.74 159-520-009 $3.74 159-520-010 $3.74 159-520-011 $3.74 159-520-012 $3.74 159-520-013 $3.74 159-520-014 $3.74 159-520-015 $3.74 159-520-016 $3.74 159-520-017 $3.74 159-520-018 $3.74 159-520-019 $3.74 159-520-020 $3.74 159-520-021 $3.74 159-520-022 $3.74 159-520-023 $3.74 159-520-024 $3.74 159-520-025 $3.74 159-520-026 $3.74 159-520-027 $3.74 159-520-028 $3.74 159-520-029 $3.74 159-520-030 $3.74 159-520-031 $3.74 159-520-032 $3.74 159-520-033 $3.74 159-520-034 $3.74 159-520-035 $3.74 159-520-036 $3.74 159-520-037 $3.74 159-520-038 $3.74 159-520-039 $3.74 159-520-040 $3.74 159-520-041 $3.74 159-520-042 $3.74 161-580-001 $3.74 161-580-002 $3.74 161-580-003 $3.74 161-580-004 $3.74 161-580-005 $3.74 161-580-006 $3.74 161-580-007 $3.74 161-580-008 $3.74 161-580-009 $3.74 161-580-010 $3.74 161-580-011 $3.74 161-580-012 $3.74 161-580-013 $3.74 161-580-014 $3.74 161-580-015 $3.74 161-580-016 $3.74 161-580-017 $3.74 161-580-018 $3.74 161-580-019 $3.74 161-580-020 $3.74 161-580-021 $3.74 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 161-580-022 $3.74 161-580-023 $3.74 161-580-024 $3.74 161-580-025 $3.74 161-580-026 $3.74 161-580-027 $3.74 161-580-028 $3.74 161-580-029 $3.74 161-580-030 $3.74 161-580-031 $3.74 161-580-032 $3.74 161-580-033 $3.74 161-580-034 $3.74 161-580-035 $3.74 161-580-036 $3.74 161-580-037 $3.74 161-580-038 $3.74 161-580-039 $3.74 161-580-040 $3.74 161-580-041 $3.74 161-580-042 $3.74 161-580-043 $3.74 161-580-044 $3.74 161-580-045 $3.74 161-580-046 $3.74 161-580-047 $3.74 161-580-048 $3.74 161-580-049 $3.74 161-580-050 $3.74 161-580-051 $3.74 161-580-052 $3.74 161-580-053 $3.74 161-580-054 $3.74 161-580-055 $3.74 161-580-056 $3.74 161-580-057 $3.74 161-580-058 $3.74 161-580-059 $3.74 161-580-060 $3.74 161-580-061 $3.74 161-580-062 $3.74 161-580-063 $3.74 161-580-064 $3.74 161-580-065 $3.74 161-580-066 $3.74 161-580-067 $3.74 161-580-068 $3.74 161-580-069 $3.74 161-580-070 $3.74 161-580-071 $3.74 161-580-072 $3.74 161-580-073 $3.74 161-580-074 $3.74 161-580-075 $3.74 161-580-076 $3.74 161-580-077 $3.74 Assessor's Parcel Number Assessment Amount 161-580-078 $3.74 161-580-079 $3.74 161-580-080 $3.74 161-580-081 $3.74 161-580-082 $3.74 161-580-083 $3.74 161-580-084 $3.74 161-580-085 $3.74 161-580-086 $3.74 161-580-087 $3.74 161-580-088 $3.74 161-580-089 $3.74 161-580-090 $3.74 161-580-091 $3.74 161-580-092 $3.74 161-580-093 $3.74 161-580-094 $3.74 161-580-095 $3.74 161-580-096 $3.74 161-580-097 $3.74 161-580-098 $3.74 161-580-099 $3.74 161-580-100 $3.74 161-580-101 $3.74 161-580-102 $3.74 161-580-103 $3.74 161-580-104 $3.74 161-580-105 $3.74 161-580-106 $3.74 161-580-107 $3.74 161-580-108 $3.74 161-580-109 $3.74 161-580-110 $3.74 161-580-111 $3.74 161-580-112 $3.74 161-580-113 $3.74 161-580-114 $3.74 161-580-115 $3.74 161-580-116 $3.74 161-580-117 $3.74 161-580-118 $3.74 161-580-119 $3.74 161-580-120 $3.74 161-580-121 $3.74 161-580-122 $3.74 161-580-123 $3.74 161-580-124 $3.74 161-580-125 $3.74 161-580-126 $3.74 161-580-127 $3.74 161-580-128 $3.74 219Total Parcels: $821.58 Total Assessment: 106 05/07/19N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\LL2\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_ll2.frx - ll21920f.dbf RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. RECEIVE from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on service charges in County Service Area (CSA) L-100, a copy of which is attached. 2. OPEN the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; RECEIVE and CONSIDER all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and CLOSE the public hearing. 3. CONSIDER whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated service charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. 4. APPROVE the estimated service charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. 5. ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/131, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. 6. DIRECT the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Final Annual Report for CSA L-100 that conforms to the County's official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area L-100 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jessi Duffy (925)313-2286 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, Brian Brown, Francisco & Associates, Inc., Slava Gospodchikov - Engineering Services , Diana Oyler - Finance , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts, Jessi Duffy- Special Districts D. 9 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:HEARING on Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area L-100; ADOPT resolution confirming the report and assessing charges. RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) Funds) (Countywide) Project No. 7394-6X5001. FISCAL IMPACT: The levy of the annual service charges in CSA L-100 will provide revenues for the continued operation and maintenance of street lighting services. The CSA L-100 total revenue was $1,730,356.97 for Fiscal Year 2018-2019 and will be $1,780,298.16 for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. In Fiscal Year 2018-2019 the basic service charge was $14.94/year per equivalent dwelling unit for a single-family home and will remain the same for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. BACKGROUND: As directed by Article 1012-2.602 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, the Public Works Director prepared a Fiscal Year 2018-2019 Tentative Annual Report on service charges in CSA L-100 and filed it with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. CSA L-100 provides street lighting services. The Tentative Annual Report contains a description of each parcel of real property receiving services, the basic service charge for CSA L-100, and the estimated amount of the service charge for each parcel for the fiscal year. Upon the filing of the Tentative Annual Report, the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors fixed a time, date and place for a Board hearing on the Tentative Annual Report and for filing objections or protests thereto, and published a notice of the hearing as provided in Government Code section 6066. Following the public hearing, the Board may adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated service charge, and shall make its determination upon each estimated service charge as described in the Tentative Annual Report. The service charges in the Tentative Annual Report were computed and apportioned according to a formula that fairly distributes the service charge among all subject parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits conferred on each property from the services provided. Staff recommends approval of the service charges in the Tentative Annual Report without modification. The service charges are unchanged from the service charges levied in CSA L-100 in Fiscal Year 2018-2019. Adoption of Resolution 2019/131 confirms the Tentative Annual Report and assesses the service charges set forth therein, but does not levy the charges. The levy of the service charges occurs after the preparation of a Final Annual Report that conforms to the official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. The official assessment roll will be issued by the County Assessor on or about July 1, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for CSA L-100 is not confirmed, either as filed or as modified, the service charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report may not be levied for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. Street lighting would have to be selectively eliminated throughout the County to meet decreased funding levels. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Received from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on service charges in County Received from staff the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report on service charges in County Service Area (CSA) L-100. Opened the public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report; received and considered all written and oral objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; and closed the public hearing. Considered whether to adopt, revise, change, reduce, increase, or modify any estimated service charge set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Approved the estimated service charges set forth in the Tentative Annual Report. Adopted Resolution No. 2019/131, confirming the Tentative Annual Report and assessing the charges set forth in the report. Directed the Public Works Director, or designee, to prepare a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Final Annual Report for CSA L-100 that conforms to the County's official assessment roll for Fiscal Year 2019-2020. (County Service Area L-100 Funds) (Countywide) Project No. 7394-6X5001. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2019/131 Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 CCC Service Area L-100 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2019/131 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/131 IN THE MATTER OF: Confirmation of the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area L-100 (Countywide Street Lighting); WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has prepared a Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for County Service Area (CSA) L-100 and filed it with the Clerk of the Board pursuant to Article 1012-2.6 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code; WHEREAS, the Clerk of the Board has fixed a time, date and place for a public hearing on the Tentative Annual Report and published notice of the hearing as provided in Government Code section 6066; WHEREAS, the Board conducted the public hearing on June 11, 2019, and considered all written and oral testimony, including any and all objections or protests to the Tentative Annual Report; WHEREAS, the Tentative Annual Report contains a description of each parcel of real property receiving street lighting services within CSA L-100, the basic service charge for CSA L-100, and the estimated service charge amount for each parcel in Fiscal Year 2019-2020; WHEREAS, the service charges in the Tentative Annual Report were computed and apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes the service charge among all subject parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits conferred on each property from the street lighting services provided within CSA L-100; and WHEREAS, the Board finds no cause to revise, change, reduce, increase or modify any estimated service charge contained in the Tentative Annual Report; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The Board hereby CONFIRMS the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Tentative Annual Report for CSA L-100 and assesses the service charges set forth in the report. Contact: Jessi Duffy (925)313-2286 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator, CAO, Robert Campbell, Auditor Controller, Sharon Anderson, County Counsel, Gus Kramer, County Assessor, Brian Brown, Francisco & Associates, Inc., Slava Gospodchikov - Engineering Services , Diana Oyler - Finance , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts, Jessi Duffy- Special Districts TENTATIVE ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SERVICE AREA L-100 (Countywide Street Lighting) June 11, 2019 Board of Supervisors John Gioia, District 1 Candace Andersen, District 2 Diane Burgis, District 3 Karen Mitchoff, District 4 Federal Glover, District 5 Prepared by Contra Costa County Public Works Department CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 1 - BACKGROUND INFORMATION On October 31, 1978, the Board of Supervisors instructed the Public Works Director to develop an alternate means to supplement ad valorem property taxes to fund street lighting in unincorporated County Service Areas. This report recommends the levying of a street lighting charge as provided in the County Service Area Law, Government Code, Sections 25210.1 and following, and in accordance with Ordinance No. 79-42, adopted by the Board of Supervisors on March 27, 1979. County Service Area (CSA) L-100 was formed on September 10, 1986, as a dependent special district of the County and as the consolidation of four street-lighting CSAs. The purpose for consolidating the four CSAs into one district was to provide more efficient and cost-effective street-lighting services throughout the County by having one new county service area with a single management structure and operational area throughout the County and in order to more equitably finance the cost of lighting services by a common service charge structure. CSA L-100 provides street lighting operations and maintenance services throughout the County’s unincorporated developed areas and pays for utility costs. CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 2 - CURRENT ANNUAL ADMINISTRATION Pursuant to County Ordinance Section 1012-2.6, former County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 25210.77a), and current County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 24210.3, subd. (d)), the Tentative Annual Report has been filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, public notice has been completed as required, and the Board will conduct a Public Hearing and then make a determination on each estimated service charge in the tentative report. Contra Costa Board of Supervisors will review the Tentative Annual Report in accordance with Resolution No. 2019/131, on June 4, 2019, and conduct a Public Hearing in connection with the proceedings for CSA L-100. Upon adoption of the Final Annual Report by the Board of Supervisors, the charges contained herein will be collected on the property tax roll of Contra Costa County in the same manner, by the same persons, at the same time as, and together with the County's general taxes. Legal Authority As required by County Ordinance Section 1012-2.6, former County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 25210.77a), and current County Service Area Law (California Government Code Section 24210.3, subd. (d)), the Tentative Annual Report includes the following minimum information as shown in the Service Charge Roll: 1. A description of each parcel of real property receiving the miscellaneous extended service; 2. The basic service charge; 3. The estimated amount of the service charge for each parcel for such year; and 4. A parcel list identifying each parcel receiving services that allows parcel owners to find their property on the list and determine the proposed charge. This annual report also includes an estimate of the annual costs and the method of apportionment as additional information to allow the reader to better understand what services are being paid for, what is the total annual cost for the services provided, and how the cost of services is spread to each individual parcel. Street Light Capital Project Implementation As of late 2015, Contra Costa County has completed the conversion of County-owned standard street lights from high-pressure sodium vapor to light-emitting diode (LED) lights. In Fiscal Year 2019-20, CSA L-100 plans on continuing an inspection program to assess, identify, and replace obsolete, damaged, and leaning street light poles. CSA L-100 is also implementing an analysis of the long-term fiscal requirements for the area so that it remains financially stable while providing the proper levels of service. Additionally, CSA L-100 is coordinating the upgrade of all decorative street lights to LED Countywide with PG&E. CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 3 - ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL COST The Fiscal Year 2018-19 projected and Fiscal Year 2019-20 proposed revenues and expenditures are shown below. A special fund has been set up for the collection of revenues and expenditures for CSA L-100. The total cost to provide the street lighting services can be recovered from the collection of service charges. Incidental expenses including administration, engineering fees, legal fees and all other costs associated with the street lighting services may also be included. When CSA L-100 was formed, a financial analysis was performed to provide the framework for an operating budget for the proposed street lighting operations and maintenance services. Revenues collected from the charge shall be used only for the expenditures represented in this report. Any balance remaining on July 1 at the end of the fiscal year must be carried over to the next fiscal year. CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 4 - CSA L‐100 Countywide Street Lighting FY 2018‐19 FY 2019‐20 Fund 240100 Org 7394 Projected Proposed Carry over from prior year: $ 5,645,194.14 $ 5,866,714.26 Revenue: Ad-valorem Revenue 976,283.04$ 1,010,000.00$ Earnings on Investment 142,140.08$ 150,000.00$ H/O Prop Tax Relief -$ 7,000.00$ RDA Nonprop-tax pass thru 43.81$ 130.00$ Transfer CSA M-30 to CSA L-100 -$ 388.44$ Assessment 611,890.04$ 612,779.72$ Right of Way Use Agreement Fee/Street Li ght Rebate - TOTAL CURRENT REVENUE $ 1,730,356.97 $ 1,780,298.16 Total Revenue + Carr yover: 7,375,551.11$ 7,647,012.42$ Expenditures: Postage 20.00$ 20.00$ Water & Electric (Utilities)910,000.00$ 920,000.00$ Publications & Legal Notices (Bay Area News Grp)250.00$ 500.00$ Memberships (CA Street Light Assoc)2,040.00$ 2,200.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Francisco)12,737.09$ 20,000.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (Fehr & Peers)37,107.50$ 40,000.00$ Professional/Specialized Svcs (PG&E)1,123.80$ -$ Other Special Departmental Expense -$ 6,088,992.42$ Tax & Assessment Fees 32,660.60$ 35,000.00$ Interfund Exp - Gov/Gov (County Counsel)-$ 2,000.00$ Interfund Exp - Gov/Gov (Prop Tax Admin)7,500.00$ 8,000.00$ Interfund Exp - Gov/Gov (Investment Fees )322.00$ 300.00$ Self-Insurance 60,000.00$ 80,000.00$ Light Pole Mtc Incidentals /Vandalism 83,579.07$ 100,000.00$ Reimbursements - Gov /Gov (County Staff)49,599.19$ 30,000.00$ Reimbursements - Gov /Gov (County Staff)212.56$ Reimbursements - Gov /Gov (County Staff)14,761.21$ Reimbursements - Gov /Gov (County Staff)289,573.73$ 300,000.00$ Reimbursements - Gov /Gov (County Staff)-$ Reimbursements - Gov /Gov (Land Develo pment)-$ Reimbursements - Gov /Gov (County Staff)7,350.11$ 20,000.00$ Total Expenditures 1,508,836.86$ 7,647,012.42$ FUND BALANCE AVAILABLE 5,866,714.26$ ‐$ CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 5 - BOUNDARY MAP The general boundaries of the CSA are shown herein. The lines and dimensions of each parcel within the CSA are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Contra Costa County Assessor for the year in which this report was prepared and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this report. A copy of the Boundary Map is shown on the following pages. Alamo Byron Clyde Rodeo DiabloMoragaCanyon Orinda Oakley Pinole Clayton ConcordPacheco Antioch Martinez Danville Richmond Crockett BlackhawkSan Ramon Lafayette Brentwood Knightsen PittsburgBay Point San Pablo El Cerrito Kensington Port Costa El Sobrante Walnut Creek Pleasant Hill Discovery Bay Bethel Island North Richmond ¯ 18,000 0 18,000 36,0009,000 Feet see Sheet 2 see Sheet 3 see Sheet 5 see Sheet 4 Contra Costa County Service Area (CSA) L-100(Countywide Street Lighting)Boundary Map Sheet 1 of 5 Legend Parcel Lines Parcels within CSA L-100 Rodeo Orinda Pinole Martinez Richm ond Hercule s Crockett Lafayette San Pablo El Ce rrito Kensington Port Costa El Sobrante North Richmond ¯ 6,700 0 6,700 13,4003,350 Feet Contra Costa County Service Area (CSA) L-100(C ountywide Stree t Lighting)Boundary Map Sheet 2 of 5 Legend Parcel Lines Parcels within CSA L-100 Clyde Clayton Concord Pacheco Martinez Lafayette PittsburgBay Point Walnut Creek Pleasant Hill ¯ 6,400 0 6,400 12,8003,200 Feet Contra Costa County Service Area (CSA) L-100(Countywide Street Lighting)Boundary Map Sheet 3 of 5 Legend Parcel Lines Parcels within CSA L-100 Alamo DiabloMoragaCanyon Danville Blackhawk San Ramon Lafayette Walnut Creek ¯6,400 0 6,400 12,8003,200 Feet Contra Costa County Service Area (CSA) L-100(Countywide Street Lighting)Boundary Map Sheet 4 of 5 Legend Parcel Lines Parcels within CSA L-100 Byron OakleyAntioch Brentwood Knightsen Discovery Bay Bethel Island ¯7,500 0 7,500 15,0003,750 Feet Contra Costa County Service Area (CSA) L-100(Countywide Street Lighting)Boundary Map Sheet 5 of 5 Legend Parcel Lines Parcels within CSA L-100 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 11 - METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT Special vs. General Benefit On November 5, 1996 California voters approved Proposition 218 entitled "Right to Vote On Taxes Act" which added Articles XIIIC and XIIID to the California Constitution. While its title refers only to taxes, Proposition 218 establishes new procedural requirements for fees, charges and benefit assessments. Although the District’s annual service charges are generally collected on the property tax rolls, the District’s service charges are not “taxes.” Service charges are distinct from the regular one percent (1%) property tax and property tax debt override in that assessment rates are not levied on an ad valorem basis. The service charges contained in this report are considered assessments under Proposition 218. Proposition 218 procedures stipulate that even if charges or benefit assessments are initially exempt from Proposition 218, future increases in the charges or benefit assessments must comply with the provisions of Proposition 218. However, if the future increase in the charge or benefit assessment were anticipated in the charge or benefit assessment formula when approved by property owners (e.g., consumer price index increases or a predetermined cap), then the future increase in the charge or benefit assessment would be in compliance with the intent and provisions of Proposition 218. Proposition 218 provides that “only special benefits are assessable” and defines a special benefit as a particular and distinct benefit conferred on real property and not a general benefit received by the public at large. Parcels located within the boundaries of the CSA will be assessed for the operation, maintenance and capital replacement costs associated with street lighting improvements as described herein, if they receive a special and direct benefit from the improvements. Furthermore, the identification and separation of general benefits from the special benefits follows for CSA L-100. In the absence of the annual assessment, the street light improvements within CSA L-100 would not be provided, therefore the enhanced public services provided within CSA L-100 confer a special benefit on the properties within the boundaries of CSA L-100 because only the parcels located within the boundaries of the CSA are served. Without the services, the property located in the unincorporated area would receive no street lighting and no special benefits. Therefore, the services in CSA L-100 are 100 percent special benefit to the parcels within the CSA. Special Benefits conferred on property within the CSA from the public street lighting improvements include:  Providing for safe vehicular and pedestrian access to property,  Providing improved livability, appearance, and desirability of property within the CSA, and  Providing safety and security to property due to enhanced illumination of the property. Properties outside of CSA L-100 do not enjoy the close proximity to the street light improvements provided by the CSA and therefore property outside the boundaries of the CSA do not receive the special benefits. Although these improvements may be available to the public at large, the public street lighting within the CSA was specifically designed, located and created to provide additional and improved public resources for the direct advantage of property inside the CSA, and not the CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 12 - public at large. The boundaries of the CSA have been narrowly drawn to include only those parcels that receive a direct advantage from the improvements. In addition to the special and direct benefits the property owners receive within the CSA from the street lighting improvements, it has been determined that no general benefits are associated with street lighting within CSA L-100. Furthermore, any benefits conferred by the street lights to the public at large are considered to be incidental, negligible and non-quantifiable benefits. The street light improvements described herein within this report, confer special benefits that affect the assessed property in a way that is distinct from their effects on other parcels and which real property in general and the public at large do not share. Methodology The total operation and maintenance costs for the extended public services are apportioned in accordance with the methodology that is consistent with standard practices. The proper functioning of street lighting is imperative for the welfare and safety of the property owners throughout the County. Proper operation, maintenance, and servicing of a street-lighting system benefits properties by providing increased illumination for ingress and egress, safety for traveling at night, improved security, protection of property and the reduction of traffic accidents. The degree of benefit is determined by the use of each individual parcel, the intensity of illumination provided, the number of pedestrians generated and the enhanced security during hours of darkness. The method for distributing the costs to each parcel is based on the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) factor. The single-family residential parcel is considered one unit of benefit (1.00 EDU). All other land uses have been analyzed to determine a benefit they receive from the intensity of illumination provided, the number of pedestrians generated by their property and the enhanced security to their property during hours of darkness. The single-family residential parcel has been selected as the basic unit for the calculation of assessment since it represents approximately 72 percent of the parcels within the County. Therefore, the single-family residential parcel is defined as one Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). The methodology used to assign EDUs to the land uses in proportion to the benefit they receive relative to the single family residential parcel is based on the intensity of the street lighting illumination adjacent to the parcel, the amount of pedestrian traffic generated from the parcel, and the security received from the street lighting to the parcel. Rate See Table 1 on the following page for Fiscal Year 2019-20 Typical Street Lighting Service Charge Rates. CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 13 - For a detailed description of the Equivalent Dwelling Unit factors by land use, see Table 2 on the following page. Land Use Number of Units Number of EDU's FY 2019-20 Charge per EDU FY 2019-20 Charge Single Family 1.00 1.00 $14.94 $14.94 Condominiums 1.00 0.50 $14.94 $7.47 10 unit Apartment 10.00 5.00 $14.94 $74.70 30 unit Apartment 30.00 7.00 $14.94 $104.58 Commercial N/A 5.00 $14.94 $74.70 Industrial Building N/A 5.00 $14.94 $74.70 Church N/A 5.00 $14.94 $74.70 Vacant Land N/A 0.50 $14.94 $7.47 TABLE 1 - TYPICAL SERVICE CHARGE RATES FY 2019-20 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 14 - Table 2 - Recommended Street Lighting EDU's by County Use Code Class County Use Code Intensity Pedestrian Security Total EDU (Factor) 1 A. Single Dwelling Unit 11, 12, 13, 14, 19, 61 0.250 0.500 0.250 1.000 B. Condominium 16, 29 0.250 0.125 0.125 0.500 2 Multiple Dwelling Units A. Two 21 0.250 1.250 0.500 2.000 B. Three 22, 24 0.250 2.250 0.500 3.000 C. Four 23 0.500 3.000 0.500 4.000 D. 5-12 25 0.500 3.500 1.000 5.000 E. 13-24 26 0.750 4.000 1.250 6.000 F. 25-59 27 0.750 4.500 1.750 7.000 G. 60 or more 28 1.000 5.000 2.000 8.000 3Commercial A. Commercial Stores 31 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 B. Small Grocery 32 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 C. Office Building 33 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 D. Medical, Dental 34 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 E. Service Stations 35 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 F. Garages 36 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 G. Recreational Clubs 37 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 H. Golf Courses 38 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 I. Bowling Alleys 39 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 J. Boat Harbors 40 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 K. Supermarkets 41 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 L. Shopping Centers 42 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 M. Financial Buildings 43 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 N. Motels, Mob. Home Parks 44 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 O. Theaters 45 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 P. Drive-In Restaurants 46 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 Q. Restaurants – Walk in 47 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 R. Multiple Commercial 48 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 S. Auto Agencies 49 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 4 Industrial 50 thru 56 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 5 Institutional A. Convalescent Hospital 70 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 B. Churches 71 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 C. Cemeteries, Mortuary 74 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 D. Fraternal & Service Org. 75 1.000 3.000 1.000 5.000 6 Miscellaneous Property A. Vacant Land 15, 17 18, 20, 30, 60, 62 thru 69 0.000 0.250 0.250 0.500 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 - 15 - SERVICE CHARGE ROLL A list, which shows those parcels to be charged for Fiscal Year 2019-20, including a description of each parcel to be charged is shown on the following pages. CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 002-040-012 $14.94SFR 002-040-043 $14.94SFR 002-040-044 $7.46VSFR 002-040-045 $14.94SFR 002-040-064 $7.46MISC 002-040-065 $7.46MISC 002-040-066 $7.46MISC 002-050-001 $7.46VSFR 002-050-002 $14.94SFR 002-050-005 $14.94SFR 002-050-006 $14.94SFR 002-050-008 $14.94SFR 002-050-009 $14.94SFR 002-050-010 $14.94SFR 002-050-011 $14.94SFR 002-050-012 $14.94SFR 002-050-013 $14.94SFR 002-060-001 $14.94SFR 002-060-003 $14.94SFR 002-060-006 $14.94SFR 002-060-008 $14.94SFR 002-060-009 $14.94SFR 002-060-010 $14.94SFR 002-060-011 $14.94SFR 002-060-012 $14.94SFR 002-060-013 $14.94SFR 002-060-014 $14.94SFR 002-060-015 $14.94SFR 002-060-020 $14.94SFR 002-060-021 $14.94SFR 002-060-022 $14.94SFR 002-060-023 $14.94SFR 002-060-024 $7.46VSFR 002-060-025 $14.94SFR 002-060-026 $14.94SFR 002-060-027 $14.94SFR 002-060-028 $14.94SFR 002-070-001 $14.94SFR 002-070-006 $14.94SFR 002-070-008 $14.94SFR 002-070-010 $14.94SFR 002-070-013 $14.94SFR 002-070-014 $14.94SFR 002-070-018 $14.94SFR 002-070-019 $14.94SFR 002-070-020 $14.94SFR 002-070-021 $14.94SFR 002-070-024 $14.94SFR 002-070-025 $14.94SFR 002-081-001 $14.94SFR 002-081-002 $74.70COM 002-081-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 002-082-001 $14.94SFR 002-082-002 $74.70COM 002-082-003 $7.46VCOM 002-083-001 $14.94SFR 002-083-002 $14.94SFR 002-083-004 $14.94SFR 002-083-005 $14.94SFR 002-083-006 $14.94SFR 002-083-007 $14.94SFR 002-083-008 $74.70COM 002-083-009 $7.46VSFR 002-083-010 $7.46VSFR 002-083-011 $14.94SFR 002-083-012 $7.46VSFR 002-083-013 $14.94SFR 002-083-014 $14.94SFR 002-083-015 $14.94SFR 002-090-004 $7.46VCOM 002-090-009 $14.94SFR 002-090-012 $74.70COM 002-090-016 $74.70COM 002-090-017 $74.70COM 002-101-001 $44.82MFR 002-101-004 $14.94SFR 002-101-005 $14.94SFR 002-101-006 $14.94SFR 002-101-007 $14.94SFR 002-102-004 $7.46VCOM 002-102-005 $7.46VCOM 002-102-006 $74.70COM 002-102-007 $74.70COM 002-102-013 $14.94SFR 002-102-015 $14.94SFR 002-102-016 $7.46VCOM 002-102-018 $74.70COM 002-110-002 $14.94SFR 002-110-003 $14.94SFR 002-110-004 $14.94SFR 002-110-005 $14.94SFR 002-110-007 $7.46VSFR 002-110-011 $14.94SFR 002-110-012 $14.94SFR 002-110-013 $74.70COM 002-110-014 $74.70IND 002-110-015 $14.94SFR 002-110-018 $14.94SFR 002-110-019 $14.94SFR 002-122-002 $14.94SFR 002-122-003 $14.94SFR 002-122-004 $14.94SFR 002-122-005 $14.94SFR 002-122-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 002-122-010 $14.94SFR 002-122-012 $29.88MFR2 002-122-013 $14.94SFR 002-122-014 $14.94SFR 002-122-017 $14.94SFR 002-122-018 $14.94SFR 002-122-019 $14.94SFR 002-122-022 $14.94SFR 002-122-023 $14.94SFR 002-140-001 $14.94SFR 002-140-002 $14.94SFR 002-140-006 $14.94SFR 002-140-008 $14.94SFR 002-140-010 $74.70COM 002-140-011 $14.94SFR 002-140-012 $14.94SFR 002-140-013 $14.94SFR 002-140-016 $14.94SFR 002-140-019 $14.94SFR 002-140-020 $14.94SFR 002-140-021 $14.94SFR 002-140-022 $14.94SFR 002-140-023 $14.94SFR 002-140-024 $14.94SFR 002-140-025 $7.46VSFR 002-140-026 $14.94SFR 002-150-007 $14.94SFR 002-150-009 $14.94SFR 002-150-010 $7.46VSFR 002-150-015 $14.94SFR 002-150-016 $14.94SFR 002-150-018 $14.94SFR 002-150-020 $14.94SFR 002-150-021 $14.94SFR 002-150-022 $14.94SFR 002-260-002 $74.70IND 003-110-003 $14.94SFR 003-110-004 $14.94SFR 003-110-005 $14.94SFR 003-110-006 $7.46MISC 003-110-009 $29.88MFR2 003-110-012 $74.70COM 003-110-013 $74.70COM 003-120-007 $14.94SFR 003-140-009 $74.70INST 003-140-010 $7.46MISC 003-140-011 $74.70INST 003-140-012 $7.46MISC 011-120-024 $74.70COM 011-220-039 $7.46VCOM 011-241-022 $7.46MISC 011-241-023 $7.46MISC - 16 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-291-002 $14.94SFR 011-291-003 $14.94SFR 011-291-004 $14.94SFR 011-291-005 $14.94SFR 011-291-006 $14.94SFR 011-291-007 $14.94SFR 011-291-008 $14.94SFR 011-291-009 $14.94SFR 011-291-010 $14.94SFR 011-291-011 $14.94SFR 011-291-012 $14.94SFR 011-291-013 $14.94SFR 011-291-014 $14.94SFR 011-291-015 $14.94SFR 011-291-017 $14.94SFR 011-291-018 $14.94SFR 011-291-019 $14.94SFR 011-291-020 $14.94SFR 011-291-021 $14.94SFR 011-291-022 $14.94SFR 011-291-023 $14.94SFR 011-291-024 $14.94SFR 011-291-025 $14.94SFR 011-291-026 $14.94SFR 011-291-027 $14.94SFR 011-291-028 $14.94SFR 011-291-029 $14.94SFR 011-291-030 $14.94SFR 011-291-031 $14.94SFR 011-291-032 $14.94SFR 011-291-033 $14.94SFR 011-291-034 $14.94SFR 011-291-035 $14.94SFR 011-291-036 $14.94SFR 011-291-037 $14.94SFR 011-291-038 $14.94SFR 011-291-039 $14.94SFR 011-291-040 $14.94SFR 011-291-041 $14.94SFR 011-291-042 $14.94SFR 011-291-043 $14.94SFR 011-291-044 $14.94SFR 011-291-045 $14.94SFR 011-291-046 $14.94SFR 011-291-047 $14.94SFR 011-291-048 $14.94SFR 011-291-049 $14.94SFR 011-291-050 $14.94SFR 011-291-051 $14.94SFR 011-291-052 $14.94SFR 011-291-053 $14.94SFR 011-291-054 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-291-055 $14.94SFR 011-291-056 $14.94SFR 011-291-057 $14.94SFR 011-291-058 $14.94SFR 011-291-059 $14.94SFR 011-291-060 $14.94SFR 011-291-061 $14.94SFR 011-291-062 $14.94SFR 011-291-063 $14.94SFR 011-291-064 $14.94SFR 011-291-066 $14.94SFR 011-302-001 $14.94SFR 011-302-002 $14.94SFR 011-302-003 $14.94SFR 011-302-004 $14.94SFR 011-302-005 $14.94SFR 011-302-006 $14.94SFR 011-302-007 $14.94SFR 011-302-008 $14.94SFR 011-302-009 $14.94SFR 011-302-010 $14.94SFR 011-302-011 $14.94SFR 011-302-012 $14.94SFR 011-302-013 $14.94SFR 011-302-014 $14.94SFR 011-302-015 $14.94SFR 011-302-016 $14.94SFR 011-302-017 $14.94SFR 011-302-018 $14.94SFR 011-302-019 $14.94SFR 011-302-020 $14.94SFR 011-302-021 $14.94SFR 011-302-022 $14.94SFR 011-302-023 $14.94SFR 011-302-024 $14.94SFR 011-302-025 $14.94SFR 011-302-026 $14.94SFR 011-302-027 $14.94SFR 011-302-028 $14.94SFR 011-302-029 $14.94SFR 011-302-030 $14.94SFR 011-302-031 $14.94SFR 011-302-032 $14.94SFR 011-302-033 $14.94SFR 011-302-034 $14.94SFR 011-302-035 $14.94SFR 011-302-036 $14.94SFR 011-302-037 $14.94SFR 011-302-038 $14.94SFR 011-302-039 $14.94SFR 011-302-040 $14.94SFR 011-302-041 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-316-001 $14.94SFR 011-316-002 $14.94SFR 011-316-003 $14.94SFR 011-316-004 $14.94SFR 011-316-005 $14.94SFR 011-316-006 $14.94SFR 011-316-007 $14.94SFR 011-316-008 $14.94SFR 011-316-009 $14.94SFR 011-316-010 $14.94SFR 011-316-011 $14.94SFR 011-316-012 $14.94SFR 011-316-013 $14.94SFR 011-316-014 $14.94SFR 011-316-015 $14.94SFR 011-316-016 $14.94SFR 011-316-017 $14.94SFR 011-316-018 $14.94SFR 011-316-019 $14.94SFR 011-316-020 $14.94SFR 011-316-021 $14.94SFR 011-316-022 $14.94SFR 011-316-023 $14.94SFR 011-316-024 $14.94SFR 011-316-025 $14.94SFR 011-316-026 $14.94SFR 011-316-027 $14.94SFR 011-316-028 $14.94SFR 011-316-029 $14.94SFR 011-316-030 $14.94SFR 011-316-031 $14.94SFR 011-316-032 $14.94SFR 011-316-033 $14.94SFR 011-316-034 $14.94SFR 011-316-035 $14.94SFR 011-316-036 $14.94SFR 011-316-037 $14.94SFR 011-316-038 $14.94SFR 011-316-039 $14.94SFR 011-316-040 $14.94SFR 011-316-041 $14.94SFR 011-316-042 $14.94SFR 011-323-001 $14.94SFR 011-323-002 $14.94SFR 011-323-003 $14.94SFR 011-323-004 $14.94SFR 011-323-005 $14.94SFR 011-323-006 $14.94SFR 011-323-007 $14.94SFR 011-323-008 $14.94SFR 011-323-009 $14.94SFR 011-323-010 $14.94SFR - 17 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-323-011 $14.94SFR 011-323-012 $14.94SFR 011-323-013 $14.94SFR 011-323-014 $14.94SFR 011-323-015 $14.94SFR 011-323-016 $14.94SFR 011-323-017 $14.94SFR 011-323-018 $14.94SFR 011-323-019 $14.94SFR 011-323-020 $14.94SFR 011-323-021 $14.94SFR 011-323-022 $14.94SFR 011-323-023 $14.94SFR 011-323-024 $14.94SFR 011-323-025 $14.94SFR 011-323-026 $14.94SFR 011-323-027 $14.94SFR 011-323-028 $14.94SFR 011-323-029 $14.94SFR 011-323-030 $14.94SFR 011-323-031 $14.94SFR 011-323-032 $14.94SFR 011-323-033 $14.94SFR 011-323-034 $14.94SFR 011-323-035 $14.94SFR 011-323-036 $14.94SFR 011-323-037 $14.94SFR 011-323-038 $14.94SFR 011-323-039 $14.94SFR 011-323-040 $14.94SFR 011-323-041 $14.94SFR 011-323-042 $14.94SFR 011-323-043 $14.94SFR 011-323-044 $14.94SFR 011-323-045 $14.94SFR 011-323-046 $14.94SFR 011-323-047 $14.94SFR 011-323-048 $14.94SFR 011-323-049 $14.94SFR 011-323-050 $14.94SFR 011-323-051 $14.94SFR 011-323-052 $14.94SFR 011-323-053 $14.94SFR 011-323-054 $14.94SFR 011-323-055 $14.94SFR 011-323-056 $14.94SFR 011-323-057 $14.94SFR 011-323-058 $14.94SFR 011-323-059 $14.94SFR 011-323-060 $14.94SFR 011-323-061 $14.94SFR 011-323-062 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-323-063 $14.94SFR 011-323-064 $14.94SFR 011-331-001 $14.94SFR 011-331-002 $14.94SFR 011-331-003 $14.94SFR 011-331-004 $14.94SFR 011-331-005 $14.94SFR 011-331-006 $14.94SFR 011-331-007 $14.94SFR 011-331-008 $14.94SFR 011-331-009 $14.94SFR 011-331-010 $14.94SFR 011-331-011 $14.94SFR 011-331-012 $14.94SFR 011-331-013 $14.94SFR 011-331-014 $14.94SFR 011-331-015 $14.94SFR 011-331-016 $14.94SFR 011-331-017 $14.94SFR 011-331-018 $14.94SFR 011-331-019 $14.94SFR 011-331-020 $14.94SFR 011-331-021 $14.94SFR 011-331-022 $14.94SFR 011-331-023 $14.94SFR 011-331-024 $14.94SFR 011-331-025 $14.94SFR 011-331-026 $14.94SFR 011-331-027 $14.94SFR 011-331-028 $14.94SFR 011-331-029 $14.94SFR 011-331-030 $14.94SFR 011-331-031 $14.94SFR 011-331-032 $14.94SFR 011-331-033 $14.94SFR 011-331-034 $14.94SFR 011-331-035 $14.94SFR 011-331-036 $14.94SFR 011-331-037 $14.94SFR 011-331-038 $14.94SFR 011-331-039 $14.94SFR 011-331-040 $14.94SFR 011-331-041 $14.94SFR 011-331-042 $14.94SFR 011-331-043 $14.94SFR 011-331-044 $14.94SFR 011-331-045 $14.94SFR 011-331-046 $14.94SFR 011-331-047 $14.94SFR 011-331-048 $14.94SFR 011-331-049 $14.94SFR 011-331-050 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-331-051 $14.94SFR 011-331-052 $14.94SFR 011-331-053 $14.94SFR 011-331-054 $14.94SFR 011-331-055 $14.94SFR 011-331-056 $14.94SFR 011-331-057 $14.94SFR 011-331-058 $14.94SFR 011-331-059 $14.94SFR 011-331-060 $14.94SFR 011-331-061 $14.94SFR 011-331-062 $14.94SFR 011-331-063 $14.94SFR 011-331-064 $14.94SFR 011-331-065 $14.94SFR 011-331-066 $14.94SFR 011-331-067 $14.94SFR 011-331-068 $14.94SFR 011-331-069 $14.94SFR 011-331-070 $14.94SFR 011-331-071 $14.94SFR 011-331-072 $14.94SFR 011-331-073 $14.94SFR 011-331-074 $14.94SFR 011-331-075 $14.94SFR 011-331-076 $14.94SFR 011-331-077 $14.94SFR 011-331-078 $14.94SFR 011-331-079 $14.94SFR 011-331-080 $14.94SFR 011-331-081 $14.94SFR 011-331-082 $14.94SFR 011-331-083 $14.94SFR 011-331-084 $14.94SFR 011-331-085 $14.94SFR 011-331-086 $14.94SFR 011-331-087 $14.94SFR 011-331-088 $14.94SFR 011-331-089 $14.94SFR 011-331-090 $14.94SFR 011-331-091 $14.94SFR 011-331-092 $14.94SFR 011-331-093 $14.94SFR 011-331-094 $14.94SFR 011-331-095 $14.94SFR 011-331-096 $14.94SFR 011-331-097 $14.94SFR 011-340-001 $14.94SFR 011-340-002 $14.94SFR 011-340-003 $14.94SFR 011-340-004 $14.94SFR 011-340-005 $14.94SFR - 18 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-340-006 $14.94SFR 011-340-007 $14.94SFR 011-340-008 $14.94SFR 011-340-009 $14.94SFR 011-340-010 $14.94SFR 011-340-011 $14.94SFR 011-340-012 $14.94SFR 011-340-013 $14.94SFR 011-340-014 $14.94SFR 011-340-015 $14.94SFR 011-340-016 $14.94SFR 011-340-017 $14.94SFR 011-340-018 $14.94SFR 011-340-019 $14.94SFR 011-340-020 $14.94SFR 011-340-021 $14.94SFR 011-340-022 $14.94SFR 011-340-023 $14.94SFR 011-340-024 $14.94SFR 011-340-025 $14.94SFR 011-340-026 $14.94SFR 011-340-027 $14.94SFR 011-340-028 $14.94SFR 011-340-029 $14.94SFR 011-340-030 $14.94SFR 011-340-031 $14.94SFR 011-340-032 $14.94SFR 011-340-033 $14.94SFR 011-340-034 $14.94SFR 011-340-035 $14.94SFR 011-340-036 $14.94SFR 011-340-037 $14.94SFR 011-340-038 $14.94SFR 011-340-039 $14.94SFR 011-340-040 $14.94SFR 011-340-041 $14.94SFR 011-340-042 $14.94SFR 011-340-043 $14.94SFR 011-340-044 $14.94SFR 011-340-045 $14.94SFR 011-340-046 $14.94SFR 011-340-047 $14.94SFR 011-340-048 $14.94SFR 011-340-049 $14.94SFR 011-340-050 $14.94SFR 011-340-051 $14.94SFR 011-340-052 $14.94SFR 011-340-053 $14.94SFR 011-340-054 $14.94SFR 011-340-055 $14.94SFR 011-340-056 $14.94SFR 011-340-057 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-340-058 $14.94SFR 011-340-059 $14.94SFR 011-340-060 $14.94SFR 011-340-061 $14.94SFR 011-340-062 $14.94SFR 011-340-063 $14.94SFR 011-340-064 $14.94SFR 011-340-065 $14.94SFR 011-340-069 $14.94SFR 011-340-070 $14.94SFR 011-340-071 $14.94SFR 011-340-072 $14.94SFR 011-340-073 $14.94SFR 011-340-074 $14.94SFR 011-340-075 $14.94SFR 011-350-009 $7.46VSFR 011-360-001 $14.94SFR 011-360-002 $14.94SFR 011-360-003 $14.94SFR 011-360-004 $14.94SFR 011-360-005 $14.94SFR 011-360-006 $14.94SFR 011-360-007 $14.94SFR 011-360-008 $14.94SFR 011-360-009 $14.94SFR 011-360-010 $14.94SFR 011-360-011 $14.94SFR 011-360-012 $14.94SFR 011-360-013 $14.94SFR 011-360-014 $14.94SFR 011-360-015 $14.94SFR 011-360-016 $14.94SFR 011-360-017 $14.94SFR 011-360-018 $14.94SFR 011-360-019 $14.94SFR 011-360-020 $14.94SFR 011-360-021 $14.94SFR 011-360-022 $14.94SFR 011-360-023 $14.94SFR 011-360-024 $14.94SFR 011-360-025 $14.94SFR 011-360-026 $14.94SFR 011-360-027 $14.94SFR 011-360-028 $14.94SFR 011-360-029 $14.94SFR 011-360-030 $14.94SFR 011-360-031 $14.94SFR 011-360-032 $14.94SFR 011-360-033 $14.94SFR 011-360-034 $14.94SFR 011-360-035 $14.94SFR 011-360-036 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-360-037 $14.94SFR 011-360-038 $14.94SFR 011-360-039 $14.94SFR 011-360-040 $14.94SFR 011-360-041 $14.94SFR 011-360-042 $14.94SFR 011-360-043 $14.94SFR 011-360-044 $14.94SFR 011-360-045 $14.94SFR 011-360-046 $14.94SFR 011-360-047 $14.94SFR 011-360-048 $14.94SFR 011-360-049 $14.94SFR 011-360-050 $14.94SFR 011-360-051 $14.94SFR 011-360-052 $14.94SFR 011-360-053 $14.94SFR 011-360-054 $14.94SFR 011-360-055 $14.94SFR 011-360-056 $14.94SFR 011-360-057 $14.94SFR 011-370-001 $14.94SFR 011-370-002 $14.94SFR 011-370-003 $14.94SFR 011-370-004 $14.94SFR 011-370-005 $14.94SFR 011-370-006 $14.94SFR 011-370-007 $14.94SFR 011-370-008 $14.94SFR 011-370-009 $14.94SFR 011-370-010 $14.94SFR 011-370-011 $14.94SFR 011-370-012 $14.94SFR 011-370-013 $14.94SFR 011-370-014 $14.94SFR 011-370-015 $14.94SFR 011-370-016 $14.94SFR 011-370-017 $14.94SFR 011-370-018 $14.94SFR 011-370-019 $14.94SFR 011-370-020 $14.94SFR 011-370-021 $14.94SFR 011-370-022 $14.94SFR 011-370-023 $14.94SFR 011-370-024 $14.94SFR 011-370-025 $14.94SFR 011-370-026 $14.94SFR 011-370-027 $14.94SFR 011-370-028 $14.94SFR 011-370-029 $14.94SFR 011-370-030 $14.94SFR 011-370-031 $14.94SFR - 19 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-370-032 $14.94SFR 011-370-033 $14.94SFR 011-370-034 $14.94SFR 011-370-035 $14.94SFR 011-370-036 $14.94SFR 011-370-037 $14.94SFR 011-370-038 $14.94SFR 011-370-039 $14.94SFR 011-370-040 $14.94SFR 011-370-041 $14.94SFR 011-370-042 $14.94SFR 011-370-043 $14.94SFR 011-370-044 $14.94SFR 011-370-045 $14.94SFR 011-370-046 $14.94SFR 011-370-047 $14.94SFR 011-370-048 $14.94SFR 011-370-049 $14.94SFR 011-370-050 $14.94SFR 011-370-051 $14.94SFR 011-370-052 $14.94SFR 011-370-053 $14.94SFR 011-370-054 $14.94SFR 011-370-055 $14.94SFR 011-370-056 $14.94SFR 011-370-057 $14.94SFR 011-370-058 $14.94SFR 011-370-059 $14.94SFR 011-370-060 $14.94SFR 011-370-061 $14.94SFR 011-370-062 $14.94SFR 011-370-063 $14.94SFR 011-370-064 $14.94SFR 011-370-065 $14.94SFR 011-370-066 $14.94SFR 011-370-067 $14.94SFR 011-370-068 $14.94SFR 011-370-069 $14.94SFR 011-370-070 $14.94SFR 011-370-071 $14.94SFR 011-370-072 $14.94SFR 011-370-073 $14.94SFR 011-370-074 $14.94SFR 011-370-075 $14.94SFR 011-370-076 $14.94SFR 011-370-077 $14.94SFR 011-381-001 $14.94SFR 011-381-002 $14.94SFR 011-381-003 $14.94SFR 011-381-004 $14.94SFR 011-381-005 $14.94SFR 011-381-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-381-007 $14.94SFR 011-381-008 $14.94SFR 011-381-009 $14.94SFR 011-381-010 $14.94SFR 011-381-011 $14.94SFR 011-381-012 $14.94SFR 011-381-013 $14.94SFR 011-381-014 $14.94SFR 011-381-015 $14.94SFR 011-381-016 $14.94SFR 011-381-017 $14.94SFR 011-381-018 $14.94SFR 011-381-019 $14.94SFR 011-381-020 $14.94SFR 011-381-021 $14.94SFR 011-381-022 $14.94SFR 011-381-023 $14.94SFR 011-381-024 $14.94SFR 011-381-025 $14.94SFR 011-381-026 $14.94SFR 011-381-027 $14.94SFR 011-381-028 $14.94SFR 011-381-029 $14.94SFR 011-381-030 $14.94SFR 011-381-031 $14.94SFR 011-381-032 $14.94SFR 011-381-033 $14.94SFR 011-381-034 $14.94SFR 011-381-035 $14.94SFR 011-381-036 $14.94SFR 011-381-037 $14.94SFR 011-381-038 $14.94SFR 011-381-039 $14.94SFR 011-381-040 $14.94SFR 011-381-041 $14.94SFR 011-381-042 $14.94SFR 011-381-043 $14.94SFR 011-381-044 $14.94SFR 011-381-045 $14.94SFR 011-381-046 $14.94SFR 011-381-047 $14.94SFR 011-381-048 $14.94SFR 011-381-049 $14.94SFR 011-381-050 $14.94SFR 011-381-051 $14.94SFR 011-381-052 $14.94SFR 011-381-053 $14.94SFR 011-381-054 $14.94SFR 011-381-055 $14.94SFR 011-381-056 $14.94SFR 011-381-057 $14.94SFR 011-381-058 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-390-001 $14.94SFR 011-390-002 $14.94SFR 011-390-003 $14.94SFR 011-390-004 $14.94SFR 011-390-005 $14.94SFR 011-390-006 $14.94SFR 011-390-007 $14.94SFR 011-390-008 $14.94SFR 011-390-009 $14.94SFR 011-390-010 $14.94SFR 011-390-011 $14.94SFR 011-390-012 $14.94SFR 011-390-013 $14.94SFR 011-390-014 $14.94SFR 011-390-015 $14.94SFR 011-390-016 $14.94SFR 011-390-017 $14.94SFR 011-390-018 $14.94SFR 011-390-019 $14.94SFR 011-390-020 $14.94SFR 011-390-021 $14.94SFR 011-390-022 $14.94SFR 011-390-023 $14.94SFR 011-390-024 $14.94SFR 011-390-025 $14.94SFR 011-390-026 $14.94SFR 011-390-027 $14.94SFR 011-390-028 $14.94SFR 011-390-029 $14.94SFR 011-390-030 $14.94SFR 011-390-031 $14.94SFR 011-390-032 $14.94SFR 011-390-033 $14.94SFR 011-390-034 $14.94SFR 011-390-035 $14.94SFR 011-390-036 $14.94SFR 011-390-037 $14.94SFR 011-390-038 $14.94SFR 011-390-039 $14.94SFR 011-390-040 $14.94SFR 011-390-041 $14.94SFR 011-390-042 $14.94SFR 011-390-043 $14.94SFR 011-390-044 $14.94SFR 011-390-045 $14.94SFR 011-390-046 $14.94SFR 011-390-047 $14.94SFR 011-390-048 $14.94SFR 011-390-049 $14.94SFR 011-390-050 $14.94SFR 011-390-051 $14.94SFR 011-390-052 $14.94SFR - 20 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-390-053 $14.94SFR 011-390-054 $14.94SFR 011-390-055 $14.94SFR 011-390-056 $14.94SFR 011-390-057 $14.94SFR 011-390-058 $14.94SFR 011-390-059 $14.94SFR 011-390-060 $14.94SFR 011-390-061 $14.94SFR 011-390-062 $14.94SFR 011-390-063 $14.94SFR 011-390-064 $14.94SFR 011-390-065 $14.94SFR 011-390-066 $14.94SFR 011-390-067 $14.94SFR 011-390-068 $14.94SFR 011-390-069 $14.94SFR 011-390-070 $14.94SFR 011-390-071 $14.94SFR 011-400-001 $14.94SFR 011-400-002 $14.94SFR 011-400-003 $14.94SFR 011-400-004 $14.94SFR 011-400-005 $14.94SFR 011-400-006 $14.94SFR 011-400-007 $14.94SFR 011-400-008 $14.94SFR 011-400-009 $14.94SFR 011-400-010 $14.94SFR 011-400-011 $14.94SFR 011-400-012 $14.94SFR 011-400-013 $14.94SFR 011-400-014 $14.94SFR 011-400-015 $14.94SFR 011-400-016 $14.94SFR 011-400-017 $14.94SFR 011-400-018 $14.94SFR 011-400-019 $14.94SFR 011-400-020 $14.94SFR 011-400-021 $14.94SFR 011-400-022 $14.94SFR 011-400-023 $14.94SFR 011-400-024 $14.94SFR 011-400-025 $14.94SFR 011-400-026 $14.94SFR 011-400-027 $14.94SFR 011-400-028 $14.94SFR 011-400-029 $14.94SFR 011-400-030 $14.94SFR 011-400-031 $14.94SFR 011-400-032 $14.94SFR 011-400-033 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-400-034 $14.94SFR 011-400-035 $14.94SFR 011-400-036 $14.94SFR 011-400-037 $14.94SFR 011-400-038 $14.94SFR 011-400-039 $14.94SFR 011-400-040 $14.94SFR 011-400-041 $14.94SFR 011-400-042 $14.94SFR 011-400-043 $14.94SFR 011-400-044 $14.94SFR 011-400-045 $14.94SFR 011-400-046 $14.94SFR 011-400-047 $14.94SFR 011-400-048 $14.94SFR 011-400-049 $14.94SFR 011-400-050 $14.94SFR 011-400-051 $14.94SFR 011-400-052 $14.94SFR 011-400-053 $14.94SFR 011-400-054 $14.94SFR 011-400-055 $14.94SFR 011-400-056 $14.94SFR 011-400-057 $14.94SFR 011-400-058 $14.94SFR 011-400-059 $14.94SFR 011-400-060 $14.94SFR 011-400-061 $14.94SFR 011-400-062 $14.94SFR 011-400-063 $14.94SFR 011-400-064 $14.94SFR 011-400-065 $14.94SFR 011-400-066 $14.94SFR 011-400-067 $14.94SFR 011-400-068 $14.94SFR 011-400-069 $14.94SFR 011-400-070 $14.94SFR 011-400-071 $14.94SFR 011-400-072 $14.94SFR 011-400-073 $14.94SFR 011-400-074 $14.94SFR 011-400-075 $14.94SFR 011-400-076 $14.94SFR 011-400-077 $14.94SFR 011-400-078 $14.94SFR 011-400-079 $14.94SFR 011-400-080 $14.94SFR 011-400-081 $14.94SFR 011-400-082 $14.94SFR 011-400-083 $14.94SFR 011-400-084 $14.94SFR 011-400-085 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-400-086 $14.94SFR 011-400-087 $14.94SFR 011-400-088 $14.94SFR 011-400-089 $14.94SFR 011-400-090 $14.94SFR 011-400-091 $14.94SFR 011-400-092 $14.94SFR 011-400-093 $14.94SFR 011-400-094 $14.94SFR 011-400-095 $14.94SFR 011-400-096 $14.94SFR 011-400-097 $14.94SFR 011-400-098 $14.94SFR 011-400-099 $14.94SFR 011-410-001 $14.94SFR 011-410-002 $14.94SFR 011-410-003 $14.94SFR 011-410-004 $14.94SFR 011-410-005 $14.94SFR 011-410-006 $14.94SFR 011-410-007 $14.94SFR 011-410-008 $14.94SFR 011-410-009 $14.94SFR 011-410-010 $14.94SFR 011-410-011 $14.94SFR 011-410-012 $14.94SFR 011-410-013 $14.94SFR 011-410-014 $14.94SFR 011-410-015 $14.94SFR 011-410-016 $14.94SFR 011-410-017 $14.94SFR 011-410-018 $14.94SFR 011-410-019 $14.94SFR 011-410-020 $14.94SFR 011-410-021 $14.94SFR 011-410-022 $14.94SFR 011-410-023 $14.94SFR 011-410-024 $14.94SFR 011-410-025 $14.94SFR 011-410-026 $14.94SFR 011-410-027 $14.94SFR 011-410-028 $14.94SFR 011-410-029 $14.94SFR 011-410-030 $14.94SFR 011-410-031 $14.94SFR 011-410-032 $14.94SFR 011-410-033 $14.94SFR 011-410-034 $14.94SFR 011-410-035 $14.94SFR 011-410-036 $14.94SFR 011-410-037 $14.94SFR 011-410-038 $14.94SFR - 21 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-410-039 $14.94SFR 011-410-040 $14.94SFR 011-410-041 $14.94SFR 011-410-042 $14.94SFR 011-410-043 $14.94SFR 011-410-044 $14.94SFR 011-410-045 $14.94SFR 011-410-046 $14.94SFR 011-410-047 $14.94SFR 011-410-048 $14.94SFR 011-410-049 $14.94SFR 011-410-050 $14.94SFR 011-410-051 $14.94SFR 011-410-052 $14.94SFR 011-410-053 $14.94SFR 011-410-054 $14.94SFR 011-410-055 $14.94SFR 011-410-056 $14.94SFR 011-410-057 $14.94SFR 011-410-058 $14.94SFR 011-410-059 $14.94SFR 011-410-060 $14.94SFR 011-410-061 $14.94SFR 011-410-062 $14.94SFR 011-410-063 $14.94SFR 011-410-064 $14.94SFR 011-410-065 $14.94SFR 011-410-066 $14.94SFR 011-410-067 $14.94SFR 011-410-068 $14.94SFR 011-410-069 $14.94SFR 011-410-070 $14.94SFR 011-410-071 $14.94SFR 011-410-072 $14.94SFR 011-410-073 $14.94SFR 011-410-074 $14.94SFR 011-410-075 $14.94SFR 011-410-076 $14.94SFR 011-410-077 $14.94SFR 011-421-001 $14.94SFR 011-421-002 $14.94SFR 011-421-003 $14.94SFR 011-421-004 $14.94SFR 011-421-005 $14.94SFR 011-421-006 $14.94SFR 011-421-007 $14.94SFR 011-421-008 $14.94SFR 011-421-009 $14.94SFR 011-421-010 $14.94SFR 011-421-011 $14.94SFR 011-421-012 $14.94SFR 011-421-013 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-421-014 $14.94SFR 011-421-015 $14.94SFR 011-421-016 $14.94SFR 011-421-017 $14.94SFR 011-421-018 $14.94SFR 011-421-019 $14.94SFR 011-421-020 $14.94SFR 011-421-021 $14.94SFR 011-421-022 $14.94SFR 011-421-023 $14.94SFR 011-421-024 $14.94SFR 011-421-025 $14.94SFR 011-421-026 $14.94SFR 011-421-027 $14.94SFR 011-421-028 $14.94SFR 011-421-029 $14.94SFR 011-421-030 $14.94SFR 011-421-031 $14.94SFR 011-421-032 $14.94SFR 011-421-033 $14.94SFR 011-421-034 $14.94SFR 011-421-035 $14.94SFR 011-421-036 $14.94SFR 011-421-037 $14.94SFR 011-421-038 $14.94SFR 011-421-039 $14.94SFR 011-421-040 $14.94SFR 011-421-041 $14.94SFR 011-421-042 $14.94SFR 011-421-043 $14.94SFR 011-421-044 $14.94SFR 011-430-001 $14.94SFR 011-430-002 $14.94SFR 011-430-003 $14.94SFR 011-430-004 $14.94SFR 011-430-005 $14.94SFR 011-430-006 $14.94SFR 011-430-007 $14.94SFR 011-430-008 $14.94SFR 011-430-009 $14.94SFR 011-430-010 $14.94SFR 011-430-011 $14.94SFR 011-430-012 $14.94SFR 011-430-013 $14.94SFR 011-430-014 $14.94SFR 011-430-015 $14.94SFR 011-430-016 $14.94SFR 011-430-017 $14.94SFR 011-430-018 $14.94SFR 011-430-019 $14.94SFR 011-430-020 $14.94SFR 011-430-021 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-430-022 $14.94SFR 011-430-023 $14.94SFR 011-430-024 $14.94SFR 011-430-025 $14.94SFR 011-430-026 $14.94SFR 011-430-027 $14.94SFR 011-430-028 $14.94SFR 011-430-029 $14.94SFR 011-430-030 $14.94SFR 011-430-031 $14.94SFR 011-430-032 $14.94SFR 011-430-033 $14.94SFR 011-430-034 $14.94SFR 011-430-035 $14.94SFR 011-430-036 $14.94SFR 011-430-037 $14.94SFR 011-430-038 $14.94SFR 011-430-039 $14.94SFR 011-430-040 $14.94SFR 011-430-041 $14.94SFR 011-430-042 $14.94SFR 011-430-043 $14.94SFR 011-430-044 $14.94SFR 011-430-045 $14.94SFR 011-430-046 $14.94SFR 011-430-047 $14.94SFR 011-430-048 $14.94SFR 011-430-049 $14.94SFR 011-430-050 $14.94SFR 011-430-051 $14.94SFR 011-430-052 $14.94SFR 011-430-053 $14.94SFR 011-430-054 $14.94SFR 011-430-055 $14.94SFR 011-430-056 $14.94SFR 011-430-057 $14.94SFR 011-430-058 $14.94SFR 011-430-059 $14.94SFR 011-430-060 $14.94SFR 011-430-061 $14.94SFR 011-430-062 $14.94SFR 011-430-063 $14.94SFR 011-430-064 $14.94SFR 011-430-065 $14.94SFR 011-430-066 $14.94SFR 011-430-067 $14.94SFR 011-430-068 $14.94SFR 011-430-069 $14.94SFR 011-430-070 $14.94SFR 011-430-071 $14.94SFR 011-430-072 $14.94SFR 011-430-073 $14.94SFR - 22 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-430-074 $14.94SFR 011-430-075 $14.94SFR 011-430-076 $14.94SFR 011-430-077 $14.94SFR 011-430-078 $14.94SFR 011-430-079 $14.94SFR 011-430-080 $14.94SFR 011-441-001 $14.94SFR 011-441-002 $14.94SFR 011-441-003 $14.94SFR 011-441-004 $14.94SFR 011-441-005 $14.94SFR 011-441-006 $14.94SFR 011-441-007 $14.94SFR 011-441-008 $14.94SFR 011-441-009 $14.94SFR 011-441-010 $14.94SFR 011-441-011 $14.94SFR 011-441-012 $14.94SFR 011-441-013 $14.94SFR 011-441-014 $14.94SFR 011-441-015 $14.94SFR 011-441-016 $14.94SFR 011-441-017 $14.94SFR 011-441-018 $14.94SFR 011-441-019 $14.94SFR 011-441-020 $14.94SFR 011-441-021 $14.94SFR 011-441-022 $14.94SFR 011-441-023 $14.94SFR 011-441-024 $14.94SFR 011-441-025 $14.94SFR 011-441-026 $14.94SFR 011-441-027 $14.94SFR 011-441-028 $14.94SFR 011-441-029 $14.94SFR 011-441-030 $14.94SFR 011-441-031 $14.94SFR 011-441-032 $14.94SFR 011-441-033 $14.94SFR 011-441-034 $14.94SFR 011-441-035 $14.94SFR 011-441-036 $14.94SFR 011-441-037 $14.94SFR 011-441-038 $14.94SFR 011-441-039 $14.94SFR 011-441-040 $14.94SFR 011-441-041 $14.94SFR 011-441-042 $14.94SFR 011-441-043 $14.94SFR 011-441-044 $14.94SFR 011-441-045 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-441-046 $14.94SFR 011-441-047 $14.94SFR 011-441-048 $14.94SFR 011-441-049 $14.94SFR 011-441-050 $14.94SFR 011-450-001 $14.94SFR 011-450-002 $14.94SFR 011-450-003 $14.94SFR 011-450-004 $14.94SFR 011-450-005 $14.94SFR 011-450-006 $14.94SFR 011-450-007 $14.94SFR 011-450-008 $14.94SFR 011-450-009 $14.94SFR 011-450-010 $14.94SFR 011-450-011 $14.94SFR 011-450-012 $14.94SFR 011-450-013 $14.94SFR 011-450-014 $14.94SFR 011-450-015 $14.94SFR 011-450-016 $14.94SFR 011-450-017 $14.94SFR 011-450-018 $14.94SFR 011-450-019 $14.94SFR 011-450-020 $14.94SFR 011-450-021 $14.94SFR 011-450-022 $14.94SFR 011-450-023 $14.94SFR 011-450-024 $14.94SFR 011-450-025 $14.94SFR 011-450-026 $14.94SFR 011-450-027 $14.94SFR 011-450-028 $14.94SFR 011-450-029 $14.94SFR 011-450-030 $14.94SFR 011-450-031 $14.94SFR 011-450-032 $14.94SFR 011-450-033 $14.94SFR 011-450-034 $14.94SFR 011-450-035 $14.94SFR 011-450-036 $14.94SFR 011-450-037 $14.94SFR 011-450-038 $14.94SFR 011-450-039 $14.94SFR 011-450-040 $14.94SFR 011-450-041 $14.94SFR 011-450-042 $14.94SFR 011-450-043 $14.94SFR 011-450-044 $14.94SFR 011-450-045 $14.94SFR 011-450-046 $14.94SFR 011-450-047 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-450-048 $14.94SFR 011-450-049 $14.94SFR 011-450-050 $14.94SFR 011-450-051 $14.94SFR 011-450-052 $14.94SFR 011-450-053 $14.94SFR 011-450-054 $14.94SFR 011-450-055 $14.94SFR 011-460-001 $14.94SFR 011-460-002 $14.94SFR 011-460-003 $14.94SFR 011-460-004 $14.94SFR 011-460-005 $14.94SFR 011-460-006 $14.94SFR 011-460-007 $14.94SFR 011-460-008 $14.94SFR 011-460-009 $14.94SFR 011-460-010 $14.94SFR 011-460-011 $14.94SFR 011-460-012 $14.94SFR 011-460-013 $14.94SFR 011-460-014 $14.94SFR 011-460-015 $14.94SFR 011-460-016 $14.94SFR 011-460-017 $14.94SFR 011-460-018 $14.94SFR 011-460-019 $14.94SFR 011-460-020 $14.94SFR 011-460-021 $14.94SFR 011-460-022 $14.94SFR 011-460-023 $14.94SFR 011-460-024 $14.94SFR 011-460-025 $14.94SFR 011-460-026 $14.94SFR 011-460-027 $14.94SFR 011-460-028 $14.94SFR 011-460-029 $14.94SFR 011-460-030 $14.94SFR 011-460-031 $14.94SFR 011-460-032 $14.94SFR 011-460-033 $14.94SFR 011-460-034 $14.94SFR 011-460-035 $14.94SFR 011-460-036 $14.94SFR 011-460-037 $14.94SFR 011-460-038 $14.94SFR 011-460-039 $14.94SFR 011-460-040 $14.94SFR 011-460-041 $14.94SFR 011-460-042 $14.94SFR 011-460-043 $14.94SFR 011-460-044 $14.94SFR - 23 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-460-045 $14.94SFR 011-460-046 $14.94SFR 011-460-047 $14.94SFR 011-460-048 $14.94SFR 011-460-049 $14.94SFR 011-470-002 $74.70COM 011-470-003 $74.70COM 011-470-004 $74.70COM 011-470-005 $74.70COM 011-470-006 $74.70COM 011-470-007 $74.70COM 011-470-009 $74.70COM 011-470-010 $74.70COM 011-490-001 $14.94SFR 011-490-002 $14.94SFR 011-490-003 $14.94SFR 011-490-004 $14.94SFR 011-490-005 $14.94SFR 011-490-006 $14.94SFR 011-490-007 $14.94SFR 011-490-008 $14.94SFR 011-490-009 $14.94SFR 011-490-010 $14.94SFR 011-490-011 $14.94SFR 011-490-012 $14.94SFR 011-490-013 $14.94SFR 011-490-014 $14.94SFR 011-490-015 $14.94SFR 011-490-016 $14.94SFR 011-490-017 $14.94SFR 011-490-018 $14.94SFR 011-490-019 $14.94SFR 011-490-020 $14.94SFR 011-490-021 $14.94SFR 011-490-022 $14.94SFR 011-490-023 $14.94SFR 011-490-024 $14.94SFR 011-490-025 $14.94SFR 011-490-026 $14.94SFR 011-490-027 $14.94SFR 011-490-028 $14.94SFR 011-490-029 $14.94SFR 011-490-030 $14.94SFR 011-490-031 $14.94SFR 011-490-032 $14.94SFR 011-490-033 $14.94SFR 011-490-034 $14.94SFR 011-490-035 $14.94SFR 011-490-036 $14.94SFR 011-490-037 $14.94SFR 011-490-038 $14.94SFR 011-490-039 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-490-040 $14.94SFR 011-490-041 $14.94SFR 011-490-042 $14.94SFR 011-490-043 $14.94SFR 011-490-044 $14.94SFR 011-490-045 $14.94SFR 011-490-046 $14.94SFR 011-490-047 $14.94SFR 011-490-048 $14.94SFR 011-490-049 $14.94SFR 011-490-050 $14.94SFR 011-490-051 $14.94SFR 011-490-052 $14.94SFR 011-490-053 $14.94SFR 011-490-054 $14.94SFR 011-490-055 $14.94SFR 011-490-056 $14.94SFR 011-490-057 $14.94SFR 011-490-058 $14.94SFR 011-490-059 $14.94SFR 011-490-060 $14.94SFR 011-490-061 $14.94SFR 011-490-062 $14.94SFR 011-490-063 $14.94SFR 011-490-064 $14.94SFR 011-490-065 $14.94SFR 011-490-066 $14.94SFR 011-490-067 $14.94SFR 011-490-068 $14.94SFR 011-490-069 $14.94SFR 011-490-070 $14.94SFR 011-490-071 $14.94SFR 011-490-072 $14.94SFR 011-500-001 $14.94SFR 011-500-002 $14.94SFR 011-500-003 $14.94SFR 011-500-004 $14.94SFR 011-500-005 $14.94SFR 011-500-006 $14.94SFR 011-500-007 $14.94SFR 011-500-008 $14.94SFR 011-500-009 $14.94SFR 011-500-010 $14.94SFR 011-500-011 $14.94SFR 011-500-012 $14.94SFR 011-500-013 $14.94SFR 011-500-014 $14.94SFR 011-500-015 $14.94SFR 011-500-016 $14.94SFR 011-500-017 $14.94SFR 011-500-018 $14.94SFR 011-500-019 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-500-020 $14.94SFR 011-500-021 $14.94SFR 011-500-022 $14.94SFR 011-500-023 $14.94SFR 011-500-024 $14.94SFR 011-500-025 $14.94SFR 011-500-026 $14.94SFR 011-500-027 $14.94SFR 011-500-028 $14.94SFR 011-500-029 $14.94SFR 011-500-030 $14.94SFR 011-500-031 $14.94SFR 011-500-032 $14.94SFR 011-500-033 $14.94SFR 011-500-034 $14.94SFR 011-500-035 $14.94SFR 011-500-036 $14.94SFR 011-500-037 $14.94SFR 011-500-038 $14.94SFR 011-500-039 $14.94SFR 011-500-040 $14.94SFR 011-500-041 $14.94SFR 011-500-042 $14.94SFR 011-500-043 $14.94SFR 011-500-044 $14.94SFR 011-500-045 $14.94SFR 011-500-046 $14.94SFR 011-500-047 $14.94SFR 011-500-048 $14.94SFR 011-500-049 $14.94SFR 011-500-050 $14.94SFR 011-500-051 $14.94SFR 011-500-052 $14.94SFR 011-500-053 $14.94SFR 011-500-054 $14.94SFR 011-500-055 $14.94SFR 011-500-056 $14.94SFR 011-500-057 $14.94SFR 011-500-058 $14.94SFR 011-500-059 $14.94SFR 011-500-060 $14.94SFR 011-500-061 $14.94SFR 011-500-062 $14.94SFR 011-500-063 $14.94SFR 011-500-064 $14.94SFR 011-500-065 $14.94SFR 011-500-066 $14.94SFR 011-500-067 $14.94SFR 011-500-068 $14.94SFR 011-500-069 $14.94SFR 011-500-070 $14.94SFR 011-500-071 $14.94SFR - 24 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-500-072 $14.94SFR 011-500-073 $14.94SFR 011-500-074 $14.94SFR 011-500-075 $14.94SFR 011-500-076 $14.94SFR 011-500-077 $14.94SFR 011-500-078 $14.94SFR 011-500-079 $14.94SFR 011-500-080 $14.94SFR 011-500-081 $14.94SFR 011-500-082 $14.94SFR 011-500-083 $14.94SFR 011-500-084 $14.94SFR 011-500-085 $14.94SFR 011-500-086 $14.94SFR 011-500-087 $14.94SFR 011-500-088 $14.94SFR 011-500-089 $14.94SFR 011-500-090 $14.94SFR 011-500-091 $14.94SFR 011-500-092 $14.94SFR 011-500-093 $14.94SFR 011-500-094 $14.94SFR 011-500-095 $14.94SFR 011-500-096 $14.94SFR 011-500-097 $14.94SFR 011-510-001 $14.94SFR 011-510-002 $14.94SFR 011-510-003 $14.94SFR 011-510-004 $14.94SFR 011-510-005 $14.94SFR 011-510-006 $14.94SFR 011-510-007 $14.94SFR 011-510-008 $14.94SFR 011-510-009 $14.94SFR 011-510-010 $14.94SFR 011-510-011 $14.94SFR 011-510-012 $14.94SFR 011-510-013 $14.94SFR 011-510-014 $14.94SFR 011-510-015 $14.94SFR 011-510-016 $14.94SFR 011-510-017 $14.94SFR 011-510-018 $14.94SFR 011-510-019 $14.94SFR 011-510-020 $14.94SFR 011-510-021 $14.94SFR 011-510-022 $14.94SFR 011-510-023 $14.94SFR 011-510-024 $14.94SFR 011-510-025 $14.94SFR 011-510-026 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-510-027 $14.94SFR 011-510-028 $14.94SFR 011-510-029 $14.94SFR 011-510-030 $14.94SFR 011-510-031 $14.94SFR 011-510-032 $14.94SFR 011-510-033 $14.94SFR 011-510-034 $14.94SFR 011-510-035 $14.94SFR 011-510-036 $14.94SFR 011-510-037 $14.94SFR 011-510-038 $14.94SFR 011-510-039 $14.94SFR 011-510-040 $14.94SFR 011-510-041 $14.94SFR 011-510-042 $14.94SFR 011-510-043 $14.94SFR 011-510-044 $14.94SFR 011-510-045 $14.94SFR 011-510-046 $14.94SFR 011-510-047 $14.94SFR 011-510-048 $14.94SFR 011-510-049 $14.94SFR 011-510-050 $14.94SFR 011-510-051 $14.94SFR 011-510-052 $14.94SFR 011-510-053 $14.94SFR 011-510-054 $14.94SFR 011-510-055 $14.94SFR 011-510-056 $14.94SFR 011-510-057 $14.94SFR 011-510-058 $14.94SFR 011-510-059 $14.94SFR 011-510-060 $14.94SFR 011-510-061 $14.94SFR 011-510-062 $14.94SFR 011-510-063 $14.94SFR 011-510-064 $14.94SFR 011-510-065 $14.94SFR 011-510-066 $14.94SFR 011-510-067 $14.94SFR 011-510-068 $14.94SFR 011-510-069 $14.94SFR 011-510-070 $14.94SFR 011-510-071 $14.94SFR 011-510-072 $14.94SFR 011-510-073 $14.94SFR 011-510-074 $14.94SFR 011-510-075 $14.94SFR 011-510-076 $14.94SFR 011-510-077 $14.94SFR 011-510-078 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-510-079 $14.94SFR 011-510-080 $14.94SFR 011-510-081 $14.94SFR 011-510-082 $14.94SFR 011-510-083 $14.94SFR 011-510-084 $14.94SFR 011-510-085 $14.94SFR 011-510-086 $14.94SFR 011-510-087 $14.94SFR 011-510-088 $14.94SFR 011-520-001 $14.94SFR 011-520-002 $14.94SFR 011-520-003 $14.94SFR 011-520-004 $14.94SFR 011-520-005 $14.94SFR 011-520-006 $14.94SFR 011-520-007 $14.94SFR 011-520-008 $14.94SFR 011-520-009 $14.94SFR 011-520-010 $14.94SFR 011-520-011 $14.94SFR 011-520-012 $14.94SFR 011-520-013 $14.94SFR 011-520-014 $14.94SFR 011-520-015 $14.94SFR 011-520-016 $14.94SFR 011-520-017 $14.94SFR 011-520-018 $14.94SFR 011-520-019 $14.94SFR 011-520-020 $14.94SFR 011-520-021 $14.94SFR 011-520-022 $14.94SFR 011-520-023 $14.94SFR 011-520-024 $14.94SFR 011-520-025 $14.94SFR 011-520-026 $14.94SFR 011-520-027 $14.94SFR 011-520-028 $14.94SFR 011-520-029 $14.94SFR 011-520-030 $14.94SFR 011-520-031 $14.94SFR 011-520-032 $14.94SFR 011-520-033 $14.94SFR 011-520-034 $14.94SFR 011-520-035 $14.94SFR 011-520-036 $14.94SFR 011-520-037 $14.94SFR 011-520-038 $14.94SFR 011-520-039 $14.94SFR 011-520-040 $14.94SFR 011-520-041 $14.94SFR 011-520-042 $14.94SFR - 25 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-520-043 $14.94SFR 011-520-044 $14.94SFR 011-520-045 $14.94SFR 011-520-046 $14.94SFR 011-520-047 $14.94SFR 011-520-048 $14.94SFR 011-520-049 $14.94SFR 011-520-050 $14.94SFR 011-520-051 $14.94SFR 011-520-052 $14.94SFR 011-520-053 $14.94SFR 011-520-054 $14.94SFR 011-530-001 $14.94SFR 011-530-002 $14.94SFR 011-530-003 $14.94SFR 011-530-004 $14.94SFR 011-530-005 $14.94SFR 011-530-006 $14.94SFR 011-530-007 $14.94SFR 011-530-008 $14.94SFR 011-530-009 $14.94SFR 011-530-010 $14.94SFR 011-530-011 $14.94SFR 011-530-012 $14.94SFR 011-530-013 $14.94SFR 011-530-014 $14.94SFR 011-530-015 $14.94SFR 011-530-016 $14.94SFR 011-530-017 $14.94SFR 011-530-018 $14.94SFR 011-530-019 $14.94SFR 011-530-020 $14.94SFR 011-530-021 $14.94SFR 011-530-022 $14.94SFR 011-530-023 $14.94SFR 011-530-024 $14.94SFR 011-530-025 $14.94SFR 011-530-026 $14.94SFR 011-530-027 $14.94SFR 011-530-028 $14.94SFR 011-530-029 $14.94SFR 011-530-030 $14.94SFR 011-530-031 $14.94SFR 011-530-032 $14.94SFR 011-530-033 $14.94SFR 011-530-034 $14.94SFR 011-530-035 $14.94SFR 011-530-036 $14.94SFR 011-530-037 $14.94SFR 011-530-038 $14.94SFR 011-530-039 $14.94SFR 011-530-040 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-530-041 $14.94SFR 011-530-042 $14.94SFR 011-530-043 $14.94SFR 011-530-044 $14.94SFR 011-530-045 $14.94SFR 011-530-046 $14.94SFR 011-530-047 $14.94SFR 011-530-048 $14.94SFR 011-530-049 $14.94SFR 011-530-050 $14.94SFR 011-530-051 $14.94SFR 011-530-052 $14.94SFR 011-530-053 $14.94SFR 011-530-054 $14.94SFR 011-530-055 $14.94SFR 011-530-056 $14.94SFR 011-540-001 $14.94SFR 011-540-002 $14.94SFR 011-540-003 $14.94SFR 011-540-004 $14.94SFR 011-540-005 $14.94SFR 011-540-006 $14.94SFR 011-540-007 $14.94SFR 011-540-008 $14.94SFR 011-540-009 $14.94SFR 011-540-010 $14.94SFR 011-540-011 $14.94SFR 011-540-012 $14.94SFR 011-540-013 $14.94SFR 011-540-014 $14.94SFR 011-540-015 $14.94SFR 011-540-016 $14.94SFR 011-540-017 $14.94SFR 011-540-018 $14.94SFR 011-540-019 $14.94SFR 011-540-020 $14.94SFR 011-540-021 $14.94SFR 011-540-022 $14.94SFR 011-540-023 $14.94SFR 011-540-024 $14.94SFR 011-540-025 $14.94SFR 011-540-026 $14.94SFR 011-540-027 $14.94SFR 011-540-028 $14.94SFR 011-540-029 $14.94SFR 011-540-030 $14.94SFR 011-540-031 $14.94SFR 011-540-032 $14.94SFR 011-540-033 $14.94SFR 011-540-034 $14.94SFR 011-540-035 $14.94SFR 011-540-036 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-540-037 $14.94SFR 011-540-038 $14.94SFR 011-540-039 $14.94SFR 011-540-040 $14.94SFR 011-540-041 $14.94SFR 011-540-042 $14.94SFR 011-540-043 $14.94SFR 011-540-044 $14.94SFR 011-540-045 $14.94SFR 011-540-046 $14.94SFR 011-540-047 $14.94SFR 011-550-001 $14.94SFR 011-550-002 $14.94SFR 011-550-003 $14.94SFR 011-550-004 $14.94SFR 011-550-005 $14.94SFR 011-550-006 $14.94SFR 011-550-007 $14.94SFR 011-550-008 $14.94SFR 011-550-009 $14.94SFR 011-550-010 $14.94SFR 011-550-011 $14.94SFR 011-550-012 $14.94SFR 011-550-013 $14.94SFR 011-550-014 $14.94SFR 011-550-015 $14.94SFR 011-550-016 $14.94SFR 011-550-017 $14.94SFR 011-550-018 $14.94SFR 011-550-019 $14.94SFR 011-550-020 $14.94SFR 011-550-021 $14.94SFR 011-550-022 $14.94SFR 011-550-023 $14.94SFR 011-550-024 $14.94SFR 011-550-025 $14.94SFR 011-550-026 $14.94SFR 011-550-027 $14.94SFR 011-550-028 $14.94SFR 011-550-029 $14.94SFR 011-550-030 $14.94SFR 011-550-031 $14.94SFR 011-550-032 $14.94SFR 011-550-033 $14.94SFR 011-550-034 $14.94SFR 011-550-035 $14.94SFR 011-550-036 $14.94SFR 011-550-037 $14.94SFR 011-550-038 $14.94SFR 011-550-039 $14.94SFR 011-550-040 $14.94SFR 011-550-041 $14.94SFR - 26 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-550-042 $14.94SFR 011-550-043 $14.94SFR 011-550-044 $14.94SFR 011-550-045 $14.94SFR 011-550-046 $14.94SFR 011-550-047 $14.94SFR 011-550-048 $14.94SFR 011-550-049 $14.94SFR 011-550-050 $14.94SFR 011-550-051 $14.94SFR 011-550-052 $14.94SFR 011-550-053 $14.94SFR 011-550-054 $14.94SFR 011-550-055 $14.94SFR 011-550-056 $14.94SFR 011-550-057 $14.94SFR 011-550-058 $14.94SFR 011-550-059 $14.94SFR 011-550-060 $14.94SFR 011-550-061 $14.94SFR 011-550-062 $14.94SFR 011-550-063 $14.94SFR 011-550-064 $14.94SFR 011-550-065 $14.94SFR 011-550-066 $14.94SFR 011-550-067 $14.94SFR 011-550-068 $14.94SFR 011-550-069 $14.94SFR 011-550-070 $14.94SFR 011-550-071 $14.94SFR 011-550-072 $14.94SFR 011-550-073 $14.94SFR 011-550-074 $14.94SFR 011-550-075 $14.94SFR 011-550-076 $14.94SFR 011-550-077 $14.94SFR 011-550-078 $14.94SFR 011-550-079 $14.94SFR 011-550-080 $14.94SFR 011-550-081 $14.94SFR 011-550-082 $14.94SFR 011-550-083 $14.94SFR 011-550-084 $14.94SFR 011-550-085 $14.94SFR 011-550-086 $14.94SFR 011-550-087 $14.94SFR 011-550-088 $14.94SFR 011-550-089 $14.94SFR 011-550-090 $14.94SFR 011-550-091 $14.94SFR 011-550-092 $14.94SFR 011-560-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-560-002 $14.94SFR 011-560-003 $14.94SFR 011-560-004 $14.94SFR 011-560-005 $14.94SFR 011-560-006 $14.94SFR 011-560-007 $14.94SFR 011-560-008 $14.94SFR 011-560-009 $14.94SFR 011-560-010 $14.94SFR 011-560-011 $14.94SFR 011-560-012 $14.94SFR 011-560-013 $14.94SFR 011-560-014 $14.94SFR 011-560-015 $14.94SFR 011-560-016 $14.94SFR 011-560-017 $14.94SFR 011-560-018 $14.94SFR 011-560-019 $14.94SFR 011-560-020 $14.94SFR 011-560-021 $14.94SFR 011-560-022 $14.94SFR 011-560-023 $14.94SFR 011-560-024 $14.94SFR 011-560-025 $14.94SFR 011-560-026 $14.94SFR 011-560-027 $14.94SFR 011-560-028 $14.94SFR 011-560-029 $14.94SFR 011-560-030 $14.94SFR 011-560-031 $14.94SFR 011-560-032 $14.94SFR 011-560-033 $14.94SFR 011-560-034 $14.94SFR 011-560-035 $14.94SFR 011-560-036 $14.94SFR 011-560-037 $14.94SFR 011-560-038 $14.94SFR 011-560-039 $14.94SFR 011-560-040 $14.94SFR 011-560-041 $14.94SFR 011-560-042 $14.94SFR 011-560-043 $14.94SFR 011-560-044 $14.94SFR 011-560-045 $14.94SFR 011-560-046 $14.94SFR 011-560-047 $14.94SFR 011-560-048 $14.94SFR 011-560-049 $14.94SFR 011-560-050 $14.94SFR 011-560-051 $14.94SFR 011-560-052 $14.94SFR 011-560-053 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-560-054 $14.94SFR 011-560-055 $14.94SFR 011-560-056 $14.94SFR 011-560-057 $14.94SFR 011-560-058 $14.94SFR 011-560-059 $14.94SFR 011-560-060 $14.94SFR 011-560-061 $14.94SFR 011-560-062 $14.94SFR 011-560-063 $14.94SFR 011-560-064 $14.94SFR 011-560-065 $14.94SFR 011-560-066 $14.94SFR 011-560-067 $14.94SFR 011-560-068 $14.94SFR 011-560-069 $14.94SFR 011-560-070 $14.94SFR 011-560-071 $14.94SFR 011-560-072 $14.94SFR 011-560-073 $14.94SFR 011-560-074 $14.94SFR 011-560-075 $14.94SFR 011-560-076 $14.94SFR 011-560-077 $14.94SFR 011-560-078 $14.94SFR 011-560-079 $14.94SFR 011-560-080 $14.94SFR 011-560-081 $14.94SFR 011-560-082 $14.94SFR 011-560-083 $14.94SFR 011-570-001 $14.94SFR 011-570-002 $14.94SFR 011-570-003 $14.94SFR 011-570-004 $14.94SFR 011-570-005 $14.94SFR 011-570-006 $14.94SFR 011-570-007 $14.94SFR 011-570-008 $14.94SFR 011-570-009 $14.94SFR 011-570-010 $14.94SFR 011-570-011 $14.94SFR 011-570-012 $14.94SFR 011-570-013 $14.94SFR 011-570-014 $14.94SFR 011-570-015 $14.94SFR 011-570-016 $14.94SFR 011-570-017 $14.94SFR 011-570-018 $14.94SFR 011-570-019 $14.94SFR 011-570-020 $14.94SFR 011-570-021 $14.94SFR 011-570-022 $14.94SFR - 27 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-570-023 $14.94SFR 011-570-024 $14.94SFR 011-570-025 $14.94SFR 011-570-026 $14.94SFR 011-570-027 $14.94SFR 011-570-028 $14.94SFR 011-570-029 $14.94SFR 011-570-030 $14.94SFR 011-570-031 $14.94SFR 011-570-032 $14.94SFR 011-570-033 $14.94SFR 011-570-034 $14.94SFR 011-570-035 $14.94SFR 011-570-036 $14.94SFR 011-570-037 $14.94SFR 011-570-038 $14.94SFR 011-570-039 $14.94SFR 011-570-040 $14.94SFR 011-570-041 $14.94SFR 011-570-042 $14.94SFR 011-570-043 $14.94SFR 011-570-044 $14.94SFR 011-570-045 $14.94SFR 011-570-046 $14.94SFR 011-570-047 $14.94SFR 011-570-048 $14.94SFR 011-580-001 $14.94SFR 011-580-002 $14.94SFR 011-580-003 $14.94SFR 011-580-004 $14.94SFR 011-580-005 $14.94SFR 011-580-006 $14.94SFR 011-580-007 $14.94SFR 011-580-008 $14.94SFR 011-580-009 $14.94SFR 011-580-010 $14.94SFR 011-580-011 $14.94SFR 011-580-012 $14.94SFR 011-580-013 $14.94SFR 011-580-014 $14.94SFR 011-580-015 $14.94SFR 011-580-016 $14.94SFR 011-580-017 $14.94SFR 011-580-018 $14.94SFR 011-580-019 $14.94SFR 011-580-020 $14.94SFR 011-580-021 $14.94SFR 011-580-022 $14.94SFR 011-580-023 $14.94SFR 011-580-024 $14.94SFR 011-580-025 $14.94SFR 011-580-026 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-580-027 $14.94SFR 011-580-028 $14.94SFR 011-580-029 $14.94SFR 011-580-030 $14.94SFR 011-580-031 $14.94SFR 011-580-032 $14.94SFR 011-580-033 $14.94SFR 011-580-034 $14.94SFR 011-580-035 $14.94SFR 011-580-036 $14.94SFR 011-580-037 $14.94SFR 011-580-038 $14.94SFR 011-580-039 $14.94SFR 011-580-040 $14.94SFR 011-580-041 $14.94SFR 011-580-042 $14.94SFR 011-580-043 $14.94SFR 011-580-044 $14.94SFR 011-580-045 $14.94SFR 011-580-046 $14.94SFR 011-580-047 $14.94SFR 011-580-048 $14.94SFR 011-580-049 $14.94SFR 011-580-050 $14.94SFR 011-580-051 $14.94SFR 011-580-052 $14.94SFR 011-580-053 $14.94SFR 011-580-054 $14.94SFR 011-580-055 $14.94SFR 011-580-056 $14.94SFR 011-580-057 $14.94SFR 011-580-058 $14.94SFR 011-580-059 $14.94SFR 011-580-060 $14.94SFR 011-580-061 $14.94SFR 011-580-062 $14.94SFR 011-580-063 $14.94SFR 011-580-064 $14.94SFR 011-580-065 $14.94SFR 011-580-066 $14.94SFR 011-580-067 $14.94SFR 011-580-068 $14.94SFR 011-580-069 $14.94SFR 011-580-070 $14.94SFR 011-580-071 $14.94SFR 011-580-072 $14.94SFR 011-580-073 $14.94SFR 011-580-074 $14.94SFR 011-580-075 $14.94SFR 011-580-076 $14.94SFR 011-580-077 $14.94SFR 011-580-078 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-580-079 $14.94SFR 011-580-080 $14.94SFR 011-580-081 $14.94SFR 011-580-082 $14.94SFR 011-590-001 $14.94SFR 011-590-002 $14.94SFR 011-590-003 $14.94SFR 011-590-004 $14.94SFR 011-590-005 $14.94SFR 011-590-006 $14.94SFR 011-590-007 $14.94SFR 011-590-008 $14.94SFR 011-590-009 $14.94SFR 011-590-010 $14.94SFR 011-590-011 $14.94SFR 011-590-012 $14.94SFR 011-590-013 $14.94SFR 011-590-014 $14.94SFR 011-590-015 $14.94SFR 011-590-016 $14.94SFR 011-590-017 $14.94SFR 011-590-018 $14.94SFR 011-590-019 $14.94SFR 011-590-020 $14.94SFR 011-590-021 $14.94SFR 011-590-022 $14.94SFR 011-590-023 $14.94SFR 011-590-024 $14.94SFR 011-590-025 $14.94SFR 011-590-026 $14.94SFR 011-590-027 $14.94SFR 011-590-028 $14.94SFR 011-590-029 $14.94SFR 011-590-030 $14.94SFR 011-590-031 $14.94SFR 011-590-032 $14.94SFR 011-590-033 $14.94SFR 011-590-034 $14.94SFR 011-590-035 $14.94SFR 011-590-036 $14.94SFR 011-590-037 $14.94SFR 011-590-038 $14.94SFR 011-590-039 $14.94SFR 011-590-040 $14.94SFR 011-590-041 $14.94SFR 011-590-042 $14.94SFR 011-590-043 $14.94SFR 011-590-044 $14.94SFR 011-590-045 $14.94SFR 011-590-046 $14.94SFR 011-590-047 $14.94SFR 011-590-048 $14.94SFR - 28 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-590-049 $14.94SFR 011-590-050 $14.94SFR 011-590-051 $14.94SFR 011-590-052 $14.94SFR 011-590-053 $14.94SFR 011-590-054 $14.94SFR 011-590-055 $14.94SFR 011-600-001 $14.94SFR 011-600-002 $14.94SFR 011-600-003 $14.94SFR 011-600-004 $14.94SFR 011-600-005 $14.94SFR 011-600-006 $14.94SFR 011-600-007 $14.94SFR 011-600-008 $14.94SFR 011-600-009 $14.94SFR 011-600-010 $14.94SFR 011-600-011 $14.94SFR 011-600-012 $14.94SFR 011-600-013 $14.94SFR 011-600-014 $14.94SFR 011-600-015 $14.94SFR 011-600-016 $14.94SFR 011-600-017 $14.94SFR 011-600-018 $14.94SFR 011-600-019 $14.94SFR 011-600-020 $14.94SFR 011-600-021 $14.94SFR 011-600-022 $14.94SFR 011-600-023 $14.94SFR 011-600-024 $14.94SFR 011-600-025 $14.94SFR 011-600-026 $14.94SFR 011-600-027 $14.94SFR 011-600-028 $14.94SFR 011-600-029 $14.94SFR 011-600-030 $14.94SFR 011-600-031 $14.94SFR 011-600-032 $14.94SFR 011-600-033 $14.94SFR 011-600-034 $14.94SFR 011-600-035 $14.94SFR 011-600-036 $14.94SFR 011-600-037 $14.94SFR 011-600-038 $14.94SFR 011-600-039 $14.94SFR 011-600-040 $14.94SFR 011-600-041 $14.94SFR 011-600-042 $14.94SFR 011-600-043 $14.94SFR 011-600-044 $14.94SFR 011-600-045 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-600-046 $14.94SFR 011-600-047 $14.94SFR 011-600-048 $14.94SFR 011-600-049 $14.94SFR 011-600-050 $14.94SFR 011-600-051 $14.94SFR 011-600-052 $14.94SFR 011-600-053 $14.94SFR 011-600-054 $14.94SFR 011-600-055 $14.94SFR 011-600-056 $14.94SFR 011-600-057 $14.94SFR 011-600-058 $14.94SFR 011-600-059 $14.94SFR 011-610-001 $14.94SFR 011-610-002 $14.94SFR 011-610-003 $14.94SFR 011-610-004 $14.94SFR 011-610-005 $14.94SFR 011-610-006 $14.94SFR 011-610-007 $14.94SFR 011-610-008 $14.94SFR 011-610-009 $14.94SFR 011-610-010 $14.94SFR 011-610-011 $14.94SFR 011-610-012 $14.94SFR 011-610-013 $14.94SFR 011-610-014 $14.94SFR 011-610-015 $14.94SFR 011-610-016 $14.94SFR 011-610-017 $14.94SFR 011-610-018 $14.94SFR 011-610-019 $14.94SFR 011-610-020 $14.94SFR 011-610-021 $14.94SFR 011-610-022 $14.94SFR 011-610-023 $14.94SFR 011-610-024 $14.94SFR 011-610-025 $14.94SFR 011-610-026 $14.94SFR 011-610-027 $14.94SFR 011-610-028 $14.94SFR 011-610-029 $14.94SFR 011-610-030 $14.94SFR 011-610-031 $14.94SFR 011-610-032 $14.94SFR 011-610-033 $14.94SFR 011-610-034 $14.94SFR 011-610-035 $14.94SFR 011-610-036 $14.94SFR 011-610-037 $14.94SFR 011-610-038 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-610-039 $14.94SFR 011-610-040 $14.94SFR 011-610-041 $14.94SFR 011-610-042 $14.94SFR 011-610-043 $14.94SFR 011-610-044 $14.94SFR 011-610-045 $14.94SFR 011-610-046 $14.94SFR 011-610-047 $14.94SFR 011-610-048 $14.94SFR 011-610-049 $14.94SFR 011-610-050 $14.94SFR 011-610-051 $14.94SFR 011-610-052 $14.94SFR 011-610-053 $14.94SFR 011-610-054 $14.94SFR 011-610-055 $14.94SFR 011-610-056 $14.94SFR 011-610-057 $14.94SFR 011-610-058 $14.94SFR 011-610-059 $14.94SFR 011-610-060 $14.94SFR 011-610-061 $14.94SFR 011-610-062 $14.94SFR 011-610-063 $14.94SFR 011-610-064 $14.94SFR 011-610-065 $14.94SFR 011-610-066 $14.94SFR 011-610-067 $14.94SFR 011-610-068 $14.94SFR 011-610-069 $14.94SFR 011-610-070 $14.94SFR 011-610-071 $14.94SFR 011-610-072 $14.94SFR 011-610-073 $14.94SFR 011-610-074 $14.94SFR 011-610-075 $14.94SFR 011-610-076 $14.94SFR 011-610-077 $14.94SFR 011-610-078 $14.94SFR 011-610-079 $14.94SFR 011-610-080 $14.94SFR 011-610-081 $14.94SFR 011-610-082 $14.94SFR 011-610-083 $14.94SFR 011-610-084 $14.94SFR 011-610-085 $14.94SFR 011-610-086 $14.94SFR 011-610-087 $14.94SFR 011-610-088 $14.94SFR 011-610-089 $14.94SFR 011-610-090 $14.94SFR - 29 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-610-091 $14.94SFR 011-610-092 $14.94SFR 011-610-093 $14.94SFR 011-610-094 $14.94SFR 011-610-095 $14.94SFR 011-610-096 $14.94SFR 011-610-097 $14.94SFR 011-610-098 $14.94SFR 011-620-001 $14.94SFR 011-620-002 $14.94SFR 011-620-003 $14.94SFR 011-620-004 $14.94SFR 011-620-005 $14.94SFR 011-620-006 $14.94SFR 011-620-007 $14.94SFR 011-620-008 $14.94SFR 011-620-009 $14.94SFR 011-620-010 $14.94SFR 011-620-011 $14.94SFR 011-620-012 $14.94SFR 011-620-013 $14.94SFR 011-620-014 $14.94SFR 011-620-015 $14.94SFR 011-620-016 $14.94SFR 011-620-017 $14.94SFR 011-620-018 $14.94SFR 011-620-019 $14.94SFR 011-620-020 $14.94SFR 011-620-021 $14.94SFR 011-620-022 $14.94SFR 011-620-023 $14.94SFR 011-620-024 $14.94SFR 011-620-025 $14.94SFR 011-620-026 $14.94SFR 011-620-027 $14.94SFR 011-620-028 $14.94SFR 011-620-029 $14.94SFR 011-620-030 $14.94SFR 011-620-031 $14.94SFR 011-620-032 $14.94SFR 011-620-033 $14.94SFR 011-620-034 $14.94SFR 011-620-035 $14.94SFR 011-620-036 $14.94SFR 011-620-037 $14.94SFR 011-620-038 $14.94SFR 011-620-039 $14.94SFR 011-620-040 $14.94SFR 011-620-041 $14.94SFR 011-620-042 $14.94SFR 011-620-043 $14.94SFR 011-620-044 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-620-045 $14.94SFR 011-620-046 $14.94SFR 011-630-004 $14.94SFR 011-630-005 $14.94SFR 011-630-006 $14.94SFR 011-630-007 $14.94SFR 011-630-008 $14.94SFR 011-630-009 $14.94SFR 011-630-018 $14.94SFR 011-630-019 $14.94SFR 011-630-038 $14.94SFR 011-630-039 $14.94SFR 011-630-057 $14.94SFR 011-630-058 $14.94SFR 011-630-099 $14.94SFR 011-630-100 $14.94SFR 011-630-101 $14.94SFR 011-630-102 $14.94SFR 011-630-103 $14.94SFR 011-630-104 $14.94SFR 011-630-105 $14.94SFR 011-630-106 $14.94SFR 011-630-107 $14.94SFR 011-630-108 $14.94SFR 011-630-109 $14.94SFR 011-630-110 $14.94SFR 011-630-111 $14.94SFR 011-630-112 $14.94SFR 011-630-113 $14.94SFR 011-630-114 $14.94SFR 011-630-115 $14.94SFR 011-630-116 $14.94SFR 011-630-117 $14.94SFR 011-630-118 $14.94SFR 011-630-119 $14.94SFR 011-630-120 $14.94SFR 011-630-121 $14.94SFR 011-630-122 $14.94SFR 011-630-123 $14.94SFR 011-630-124 $14.94SFR 011-630-125 $14.94SFR 011-630-126 $14.94SFR 011-630-127 $14.94SFR 011-630-128 $14.94SFR 011-630-129 $14.94SFR 011-630-130 $14.94SFR 011-630-131 $14.94SFR 011-630-132 $14.94SFR 011-630-133 $14.94SFR 011-630-134 $14.94SFR 011-630-135 $14.94SFR 011-630-136 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-630-137 $14.94SFR 011-630-138 $14.94SFR 011-630-139 $14.94SFR 011-630-140 $14.94SFR 011-630-141 $14.94SFR 011-630-142 $14.94SFR 011-630-143 $14.94SFR 011-630-144 $14.94SFR 011-630-145 $14.94SFR 011-630-146 $14.94SFR 011-630-147 $14.94SFR 011-630-148 $14.94SFR 011-630-149 $14.94SFR 011-630-150 $14.94SFR 011-630-151 $14.94SFR 011-630-152 $14.94SFR 011-630-153 $14.94SFR 011-630-154 $14.94SFR 011-630-155 $14.94SFR 011-630-156 $14.94SFR 011-630-157 $14.94SFR 011-630-158 $14.94SFR 011-630-159 $14.94SFR 011-630-160 $14.94SFR 011-630-161 $14.94SFR 011-630-162 $14.94SFR 011-630-163 $14.94SFR 011-630-164 $14.94SFR 011-630-165 $14.94SFR 011-630-166 $14.94SFR 011-630-167 $14.94SFR 011-630-168 $14.94SFR 011-630-169 $14.94SFR 011-630-170 $14.94SFR 011-630-171 $14.94SFR 011-630-172 $14.94SFR 011-630-173 $14.94SFR 011-630-174 $14.94SFR 011-630-175 $14.94SFR 011-630-176 $14.94SFR 011-630-177 $14.94SFR 011-630-178 $14.94SFR 011-640-001 $14.94SFR 011-640-002 $14.94SFR 011-640-003 $14.94SFR 011-640-004 $14.94SFR 011-640-005 $14.94SFR 011-640-006 $14.94SFR 011-640-007 $14.94SFR 011-640-008 $14.94SFR 011-640-009 $14.94SFR 011-640-010 $14.94SFR - 30 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-640-011 $14.94SFR 011-640-012 $14.94SFR 011-640-013 $14.94SFR 011-640-014 $14.94SFR 011-640-015 $14.94SFR 011-640-016 $14.94SFR 011-640-017 $14.94SFR 011-640-018 $14.94SFR 011-640-019 $14.94SFR 011-640-020 $14.94SFR 011-640-021 $14.94SFR 011-640-022 $14.94SFR 011-640-023 $14.94SFR 011-640-024 $14.94SFR 011-640-025 $14.94SFR 011-640-026 $14.94SFR 011-640-027 $14.94SFR 011-640-028 $14.94SFR 011-640-029 $14.94SFR 011-640-030 $14.94SFR 011-640-031 $14.94SFR 011-640-032 $14.94SFR 011-640-033 $14.94SFR 011-640-034 $14.94SFR 011-640-035 $14.94SFR 011-640-036 $14.94SFR 011-640-037 $14.94SFR 011-640-038 $14.94SFR 011-650-001 $7.46VSFR 011-650-002 $14.94SFR 011-650-003 $14.94SFR 011-650-004 $14.94SFR 011-650-005 $14.94SFR 011-650-006 $7.46VSFR 011-650-007 $7.46VSFR 011-650-008 $14.94SFR 011-650-009 $14.94SFR 011-650-010 $14.94SFR 011-650-011 $14.94SFR 011-650-012 $7.46VSFR 011-650-013 $7.46VSFR 011-650-014 $7.46VSFR 011-650-015 $7.46VSFR 011-650-016 $7.46VSFR 011-650-017 $7.46VSFR 011-650-018 $7.46VSFR 011-650-019 $7.46VSFR 011-650-020 $7.46VSFR 011-650-021 $7.46VSFR 011-650-022 $7.46VSFR 011-650-023 $7.46VSFR 011-650-024 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-650-025 $7.46VSFR 011-650-026 $14.94SFR 011-650-027 $14.94SFR 011-650-028 $14.94SFR 011-650-029 $14.94SFR 011-650-030 $14.94SFR 011-650-031 $14.94SFR 011-650-032 $14.94SFR 011-650-033 $14.94SFR 011-650-034 $14.94SFR 011-650-035 $14.94SFR 011-650-036 $14.94SFR 011-650-037 $14.94SFR 011-650-038 $14.94SFR 011-650-039 $14.94SFR 011-650-040 $14.94SFR 011-650-041 $14.94SFR 011-650-042 $14.94SFR 011-650-043 $14.94SFR 011-650-044 $14.94SFR 011-650-045 $14.94SFR 011-650-046 $14.94SFR 011-650-047 $14.94SFR 011-650-048 $14.94SFR 011-650-049 $14.94SFR 011-650-050 $14.94SFR 011-650-051 $14.94SFR 011-650-052 $14.94SFR 011-650-053 $14.94SFR 011-650-054 $14.94SFR 011-650-055 $14.94SFR 011-650-056 $14.94SFR 011-650-057 $14.94SFR 011-650-058 $14.94SFR 011-650-059 $14.94SFR 011-650-060 $14.94SFR 011-650-061 $14.94SFR 011-650-062 $14.94SFR 011-650-063 $14.94SFR 011-650-064 $14.94SFR 011-650-065 $14.94SFR 011-650-066 $14.94SFR 011-650-067 $14.94SFR 011-650-068 $14.94SFR 011-650-069 $14.94SFR 011-650-070 $14.94SFR 011-650-071 $14.94SFR 011-650-072 $14.94SFR 011-650-073 $14.94SFR 011-650-074 $14.94SFR 011-650-075 $14.94SFR 011-650-076 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-650-077 $14.94SFR 011-650-078 $14.94SFR 011-650-079 $14.94SFR 011-650-080 $14.94SFR 011-650-081 $14.94SFR 011-650-082 $14.94SFR 011-650-083 $14.94SFR 011-650-084 $14.94SFR 011-650-085 $14.94SFR 011-650-086 $14.94SFR 011-650-087 $14.94SFR 011-650-088 $14.94SFR 011-650-089 $14.94SFR 011-650-090 $14.94SFR 011-650-091 $14.94SFR 011-650-092 $14.94SFR 011-650-093 $14.94SFR 011-650-094 $14.94SFR 011-650-095 $14.94SFR 011-650-096 $14.94SFR 011-650-097 $14.94SFR 011-650-098 $14.94SFR 011-650-099 $14.94SFR 011-650-100 $14.94SFR 011-650-101 $14.94SFR 011-650-102 $14.94SFR 011-650-103 $14.94SFR 011-650-104 $14.94SFR 011-650-105 $14.94SFR 011-650-106 $14.94SFR 011-650-107 $14.94SFR 011-650-108 $14.94SFR 011-650-109 $14.94SFR 011-650-110 $14.94SFR 011-660-001 $14.94SFR 011-660-002 $14.94SFR 011-660-003 $14.94SFR 011-660-004 $14.94SFR 011-660-005 $14.94SFR 011-660-006 $14.94SFR 011-660-007 $14.94SFR 011-660-008 $14.94SFR 011-660-009 $14.94SFR 011-660-010 $14.94SFR 011-660-011 $14.94SFR 011-660-012 $14.94SFR 011-660-013 $14.94SFR 011-660-014 $14.94SFR 011-660-015 $14.94SFR 011-660-016 $14.94SFR 011-660-017 $14.94SFR 011-660-018 $14.94SFR - 31 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-660-019 $14.94SFR 011-660-020 $14.94SFR 011-660-021 $14.94SFR 011-660-022 $14.94SFR 011-660-023 $14.94SFR 011-660-024 $14.94SFR 011-660-025 $14.94SFR 011-660-026 $14.94SFR 011-660-027 $14.94SFR 011-660-028 $14.94SFR 011-660-029 $14.94SFR 011-660-030 $14.94SFR 011-660-031 $14.94SFR 011-660-032 $14.94SFR 011-660-033 $14.94SFR 011-660-034 $14.94SFR 011-660-035 $14.94SFR 011-660-036 $14.94SFR 011-660-037 $7.46VSFR 011-660-038 $14.94SFR 011-660-039 $14.94SFR 011-660-040 $14.94SFR 011-660-041 $14.94SFR 011-660-042 $14.94SFR 011-670-001 $14.94SFR 011-670-002 $14.94SFR 011-670-003 $14.94SFR 011-670-004 $14.94SFR 011-670-005 $14.94SFR 011-670-006 $14.94SFR 011-670-007 $14.94SFR 011-670-008 $14.94SFR 011-670-009 $14.94SFR 011-670-010 $14.94SFR 011-670-011 $14.94SFR 011-670-012 $7.46VSFR 011-670-013 $7.46VSFR 011-670-014 $7.46VSFR 011-670-015 $7.46VSFR 011-670-016 $7.46VSFR 011-670-017 $7.46VSFR 011-670-018 $7.46VSFR 011-670-019 $14.94SFR 011-670-020 $7.46VSFR 011-670-021 $14.94SFR 011-670-022 $7.46VSFR 011-670-023 $14.94SFR 011-670-024 $14.94SFR 011-670-025 $14.94SFR 011-670-026 $14.94SFR 011-670-027 $14.94SFR 011-670-028 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-670-029 $14.94SFR 011-670-030 $14.94SFR 011-670-031 $14.94SFR 011-670-032 $14.94SFR 011-670-033 $14.94SFR 011-670-034 $14.94SFR 011-670-035 $14.94SFR 011-670-036 $14.94SFR 011-670-037 $14.94SFR 011-670-038 $14.94SFR 011-670-039 $14.94SFR 011-670-040 $14.94SFR 011-670-041 $14.94SFR 011-670-042 $14.94SFR 011-670-043 $14.94SFR 011-680-001 $14.94SFR 011-680-002 $14.94SFR 011-680-003 $14.94SFR 011-680-004 $7.46VSFR 011-680-005 $14.94SFR 011-680-006 $14.94SFR 011-680-007 $7.46VSFR 011-680-008 $7.46VSFR 011-680-009 $7.46VSFR 011-680-010 $14.94SFR 011-680-011 $14.94SFR 011-680-012 $14.94SFR 011-680-013 $14.94SFR 011-680-014 $14.94SFR 011-680-015 $14.94SFR 011-680-016 $14.94SFR 011-680-017 $14.94SFR 011-680-018 $14.94SFR 011-680-019 $14.94SFR 011-680-020 $14.94SFR 011-680-021 $14.94SFR 011-680-022 $14.94SFR 011-680-023 $14.94SFR 011-680-024 $14.94SFR 011-680-025 $14.94SFR 011-680-026 $14.94SFR 011-680-027 $14.94SFR 011-680-028 $7.46VSFR 011-680-029 $7.46VSFR 011-680-030 $14.94SFR 011-680-031 $14.94SFR 011-680-032 $7.46VSFR 011-680-033 $14.94SFR 011-680-034 $14.94SFR 011-680-035 $7.46VSFR 011-680-036 $7.46VSFR 011-680-037 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-680-038 $7.46VSFR 011-680-039 $14.94SFR 011-680-040 $7.46VSFR 011-680-041 $7.46VSFR 011-680-042 $7.46VSFR 011-680-043 $7.46VSFR 011-680-044 $7.46VSFR 011-680-045 $7.46VSFR 011-680-046 $7.46VSFR 011-680-047 $7.46VSFR 011-680-048 $7.46VSFR 011-680-049 $7.46VSFR 011-680-050 $7.46VSFR 011-680-051 $7.46VSFR 011-680-052 $7.46VSFR 011-680-053 $7.46VSFR 011-680-054 $7.46VSFR 011-680-055 $7.46VSFR 011-680-056 $14.94SFR 011-680-057 $14.94SFR 011-680-058 $14.94SFR 011-680-059 $14.94SFR 011-680-060 $7.46VSFR 011-690-001 $7.46VSFR 011-690-002 $7.46VSFR 011-690-003 $7.46VSFR 011-690-004 $7.46VSFR 011-690-005 $7.46VSFR 011-690-006 $7.46VSFR 011-690-007 $7.46VSFR 011-690-008 $7.46VSFR 011-690-009 $7.46VSFR 011-690-010 $7.46VSFR 011-690-011 $7.46VSFR 011-690-012 $7.46VSFR 011-690-013 $7.46VSFR 011-690-014 $7.46VSFR 011-690-015 $7.46VSFR 011-690-016 $7.46VSFR 011-690-017 $7.46VSFR 011-690-018 $7.46VSFR 011-690-019 $7.46VSFR 011-690-020 $7.46VSFR 011-690-021 $7.46VSFR 011-690-022 $7.46VSFR 011-690-023 $7.46VSFR 011-690-024 $7.46VSFR 011-690-025 $7.46VSFR 011-690-026 $7.46VSFR 011-690-027 $7.46VSFR 011-690-028 $7.46VSFR 011-690-029 $7.46VSFR - 32 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 011-690-030 $7.46VSFR 011-690-031 $7.46VSFR 011-690-032 $7.46VSFR 011-690-033 $7.46VSFR 011-690-034 $7.46VSFR 011-690-035 $7.46VSFR 011-690-036 $7.46VSFR 011-690-037 $7.46VSFR 011-690-038 $7.46VSFR 011-690-039 $7.46VSFR 011-690-040 $7.46VSFR 011-690-041 $7.46VSFR 011-690-042 $7.46VSFR 011-690-043 $7.46VSFR 011-690-044 $7.46VSFR 011-690-045 $7.46VSFR 011-690-046 $7.46VSFR 011-690-047 $7.46VSFR 015-090-050 $7.46MISC 015-090-051 $7.46MISC 015-090-052 $7.46MISC 015-270-003 $14.94SFR 018-280-022 $14.94SFR 018-321-002 $14.94SFR 018-321-003 $14.94SFR 018-321-004 $14.94SFR 018-321-005 $14.94SFR 018-321-006 $14.94SFR 018-321-007 $14.94SFR 018-321-008 $14.94SFR 018-321-009 $14.94SFR 018-321-010 $14.94SFR 018-321-011 $14.94SFR 018-322-003 $14.94SFR 018-322-004 $14.94SFR 018-322-005 $14.94SFR 018-322-006 $14.94SFR 018-322-007 $14.94SFR 018-322-008 $14.94SFR 018-322-009 $14.94SFR 018-322-010 $14.94SFR 018-322-024 $14.94SFR 020-063-003 $74.70INST 020-064-001 $14.94SFR 020-064-002 $14.94SFR 020-071-011 $14.94SFR 020-071-012 $14.94SFR 020-071-013 $7.46VCOM 020-071-014 $14.94SFR 020-071-015 $14.94SFR 020-072-002 $14.94SFR 020-072-003 $74.70INST Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 020-072-004 $14.94SFR 020-072-005 $14.94SFR 020-072-006 $14.94SFR 020-072-007 $14.94SFR 020-072-008 $7.46VSFR 020-072-009 $14.94SFR 020-072-010 $14.94SFR 020-073-003 $74.70INST 020-073-004 $74.70COM 020-073-005 $74.70COM 020-073-006 $7.46VCOM 020-073-007 $74.70COM 020-073-008 $74.70COM 020-073-009 $14.94SFR 020-073-010 $14.94SFR 020-073-011 $14.94SFR 020-073-012 $14.94SFR 020-073-013 $7.46VSFR 020-073-014 $74.70COM 020-150-009 $7.46MISC 020-210-035 $7.46MISC 020-210-036 $7.46MISC 020-280-003 $14.94SFR 020-280-004 $14.94SFR 020-280-008 $14.94SFR 020-280-011 $14.94SFR 020-280-012 $14.94SFR 020-280-013 $14.94SFR 020-290-001 $14.94SFR 020-290-002 $14.94SFR 020-290-003 $14.94SFR 020-290-004 $14.94SFR 020-290-005 $14.94SFR 020-290-006 $14.94SFR 020-290-007 $14.94SFR 020-290-008 $14.94SFR 020-290-009 $14.94SFR 020-300-001 $14.94SFR 020-300-002 $14.94SFR 020-300-003 $14.94SFR 020-300-004 $7.46VSFR 020-300-005 $7.46VSFR 020-300-006 $7.46VSFR 020-300-007 $7.46VSFR 020-300-008 $7.46VSFR 020-300-009 $7.46VSFR 020-300-010 $7.46VSFR 020-310-001 $7.46VSFR 020-310-002 $7.46VSFR 020-310-003 $7.46VSFR 020-310-004 $7.46VSFR 020-310-005 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 020-310-006 $7.46VSFR 020-310-007 $7.46VSFR 020-310-008 $7.46VSFR 020-320-001 $7.46VSFR 020-320-002 $7.46VSFR 020-320-003 $7.46VSFR 020-320-004 $7.46VSFR 020-320-005 $7.46VSFR 020-320-006 $7.46VSFR 020-320-007 $7.46VSFR 020-320-008 $7.46VSFR 020-320-009 $7.46VSFR 020-320-010 $7.46VSFR 020-320-011 $7.46VSFR 020-320-012 $7.46VSFR 020-320-013 $7.46VSFR 020-320-014 $7.46VSFR 020-320-015 $7.46VSFR 020-320-016 $7.46VSFR 020-320-017 $7.46VSFR 020-320-018 $7.46VSFR 020-320-019 $7.46VSFR 020-320-020 $7.46VSFR 020-320-021 $7.46VSFR 028-030-002 $7.46VSFR 028-030-004 $7.46MISC 029-010-017 $7.46MISC 029-020-002 $7.46VSFR 029-020-004 $74.70COM 029-090-001 $14.94SFR 029-090-002 $14.94SFR 029-090-003 $14.94SFR 029-090-004 $7.46VSFR 029-090-005 $14.94SFR 029-090-006 $7.46VSFR 029-100-001 $7.46VSFR 029-100-002 $14.94SFR 029-100-003 $14.94SFR 029-100-004 $14.94SFR 029-100-005 $7.46VSFR 029-100-006 $14.94SFR 029-100-007 $14.94SFR 029-100-008 $14.94SFR 029-100-009 $14.94SFR 029-100-010 $7.46VSFR 029-100-011 $14.94SFR 029-100-012 $14.94SFR 029-100-013 $14.94SFR 029-100-014 $14.94SFR 029-100-015 $14.94SFR 029-100-020 $14.94SFR 029-100-021 $14.94SFR - 33 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 029-100-022 $14.94SFR 029-100-023 $7.46VSFR 029-100-024 $7.46VSFR 029-100-025 $14.94SFR 029-100-026 $14.94SFR 029-100-027 $14.94SFR 029-100-028 $14.94SFR 029-100-029 $7.46VSFR 029-100-030 $14.94SFR 029-100-031 $14.94SFR 029-100-032 $14.94SFR 029-100-033 $14.94SFR 029-100-034 $14.94SFR 029-100-035 $14.94SFR 029-100-036 $14.94SFR 029-100-037 $14.94SFR 029-100-038 $14.94SFR 029-100-039 $14.94SFR 029-100-040 $14.94SFR 029-100-041 $14.94SFR 029-100-042 $14.94SFR 029-100-043 $14.94SFR 029-100-044 $7.46VSFR 029-100-055 $14.94SFR 029-100-056 $7.46VSFR 029-120-001 $14.94SFR 029-120-002 $14.94SFR 029-120-003 $14.94SFR 029-120-004 $14.94SFR 029-120-005 $14.94SFR 029-120-006 $14.94SFR 029-120-007 $14.94SFR 029-120-008 $7.46VSFR 029-120-009 $7.46VSFR 029-120-010 $7.46VSFR 029-120-011 $7.46VSFR 029-120-012 $14.94SFR 029-120-013 $7.46VSFR 029-120-014 $14.94SFR 029-120-015 $14.94SFR 029-120-016 $14.94SFR 029-120-017 $14.94SFR 029-120-018 $14.94SFR 029-120-019 $7.46VSFR 029-120-020 $7.46VSFR 029-120-021 $14.94SFR 029-120-023 $7.46VSFR 029-120-024 $14.94SFR 029-120-025 $7.46VSFR 030-010-005 $14.94SFR 030-010-006 $14.94SFR 030-010-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 030-010-008 $7.46VSFR 030-010-009 $14.94SFR 030-010-010 $14.94SFR 030-010-011 $14.94SFR 030-010-012 $14.94SFR 030-010-058 $14.94SFR 030-010-060 $14.94SFR 030-010-066 $14.94SFR 030-010-067 $14.94SFR 030-060-001 $74.70COM 030-060-002 $74.70COM 030-070-012 $74.70COM 030-070-016 $74.70COM 030-070-017 $74.70COM 030-070-019 $74.70COM 030-070-025 $74.70COM 030-070-026 $74.70COM 030-070-039 $74.70COM 030-110-005 $7.46VCOM 030-110-006 $7.46VCOM 030-120-013 $74.70COM 030-120-014 $74.70COM 030-120-017 $74.70COM 030-120-034 $74.70COM 031-010-011 $7.46VMFR 031-010-012 $7.46VSFR 031-010-013 $7.46VSFR 031-010-018 $7.46VCOM 031-010-019 $7.46VCOM 031-010-020 $7.46VSFR 031-021-004 $74.70COM 031-021-005 $14.94SFR 031-021-006 $74.70COM 031-021-007 $7.46VCOM 031-021-009 $7.46VCOM 031-021-012 $7.46VSFR 031-021-013 $7.46VSFR 031-021-014 $74.70COM 031-021-015 $7.46VCOM 031-021-017 $7.46VCOM 031-021-018 $7.46VCOM 031-021-019 $7.46VCOM 031-022-019 $74.70COM 031-022-020 $7.46VCOM 031-022-021 $7.46VCOM 031-022-022 $7.46VCOM 031-022-024 $7.46VCOM 031-022-025 $7.46VCOM 031-022-026 $7.46VCOM 031-022-027 $7.46VCOM 031-022-028 $7.46VCOM 031-022-029 $7.46VCOM Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-022-030 $7.46VCOM 031-022-031 $74.70COM 031-022-033 $74.70MFR5 031-022-035 $74.70COM 031-022-036 $74.70COM 031-022-037 $14.94SFR 031-022-038 $74.70COM 031-031-013 $74.70COM 031-031-014 $74.70COM 031-031-015 $74.70COM 031-031-016 $14.94SFR 031-031-018 $74.70COM 031-031-019 $7.46VCOM 031-031-020 $74.70COM 031-032-002 $74.70INST 031-032-003 $74.70INST 031-032-004 $14.94SFR 031-033-003 $74.70COM 031-033-004 $74.70COM 031-033-005 $74.70COM 031-033-006 $74.70COM 031-091-002 $7.46VCOM 031-091-003 $74.70COM 031-091-004 $74.70COM 031-091-007 $74.70COM 031-091-009 $74.70COM 031-091-012 $74.70COM 031-091-013 $74.70COM 031-092-001 $74.70COM 031-092-002 $7.46VCOM 031-092-003 $14.94SFR 031-092-004 $7.46VCOM 031-092-005 $14.94SFR 031-092-006 $7.46VSFR 031-092-007 $14.94SFR 031-092-008 $14.94SFR 031-092-012 $14.94SFR 031-092-013 $14.94SFR 031-092-014 $14.94SFR 031-092-015 $14.94SFR 031-092-016 $14.94SFR 031-092-017 $7.46VSFR 031-093-008 $7.46VSFR 031-093-009 $14.94SFR 031-093-010 $14.94SFR 031-093-011 $14.94SFR 031-093-018 $74.70COM 031-093-022 $74.70COM 031-093-023 $74.70COM 031-093-027 $74.70COM 031-093-028 $74.70COM 031-093-033 $7.46VCOM - 34 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-093-035 $7.46VCOM 031-093-036 $14.94SFR 031-093-037 $14.94SFR 031-093-039 $7.46VSFR 031-093-040 $7.46VSFR 031-093-041 $7.46VSFR 031-093-042 $7.46VSFR 031-093-043 $7.46VSFR 031-093-044 $74.70COM 031-101-001 $14.94SFR 031-101-004 $14.94SFR 031-101-005 $14.94SFR 031-101-006 $14.94SFR 031-101-007 $7.46VSFR 031-101-008 $14.94SFR 031-101-009 $7.46VSFR 031-101-010 $14.94SFR 031-102-001 $14.94SFR 031-102-002 $14.94SFR 031-102-003 $14.94SFR 031-102-004 $14.94SFR 031-102-005 $14.94SFR 031-102-008 $14.94SFR 031-102-009 $14.94SFR 031-102-010 $14.94SFR 031-102-011 $7.46VSFR 031-102-012 $7.46VSFR 031-102-015 $14.94SFR 031-102-016 $7.46VSFR 031-102-017 $7.46VSFR 031-102-018 $7.46VSFR 031-102-029 $7.46VSFR 031-102-030 $74.70COM 031-102-031 $74.70COM 031-102-032 $74.70COM 031-102-033 $74.70COM 031-102-037 $7.46VSFR 031-102-038 $14.94SFR 031-102-042 $7.46VSFR 031-102-044 $14.94SFR 031-102-045 $14.94SFR 031-102-046 $14.94SFR 031-102-047 $14.94SFR 031-102-048 $14.94SFR 031-102-049 $14.94SFR 031-102-050 $7.46VSFR 031-102-051 $14.94SFR 031-102-052 $14.94SFR 031-102-053 $7.46VSFR 031-110-004 $7.46VSFR 031-110-005 $7.46VSFR 031-110-008 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-110-009 $7.46VSFR 031-110-012 $7.46VSFR 031-110-013 $14.94SFR 031-110-014 $7.46VSFR 031-110-015 $7.46VSFR 031-110-018 $14.94SFR 031-110-019 $7.46VSFR 031-110-022 $7.46VSFR 031-110-023 $7.46VSFR 031-110-026 $7.46VSFR 031-110-030 $7.46VSFR 031-110-031 $7.46VSFR 031-110-037 $14.94SFR 031-110-039 $14.94SFR 031-110-040 $14.94SFR 031-110-041 $14.94SFR 031-110-042 $7.46VSFR 031-110-043 $14.94SFR 031-110-045 $14.94SFR 031-110-046 $7.46VSFR 031-110-047 $7.46VSFR 031-110-048 $14.94SFR 031-110-049 $14.94SFR 031-110-050 $14.94SFR 031-110-051 $7.46VSFR 031-110-052 $14.94SFR 031-110-053 $14.94SFR 031-110-054 $7.46VSFR 031-110-055 $7.46VSFR 031-121-004 $7.46VSFR 031-121-005 $7.46VSFR 031-121-009 $7.46VSFR 031-121-012 $7.46VSFR 031-121-013 $7.46VSFR 031-121-017 $7.46VSFR 031-121-021 $7.46VSFR 031-121-022 $7.46VSFR 031-121-025 $7.46VSFR 031-121-039 $7.46VSFR 031-121-044 $14.94SFR 031-121-045 $14.94SFR 031-121-046 $14.94SFR 031-121-047 $14.94SFR 031-121-048 $7.46VSFR 031-121-049 $14.94SFR 031-121-050 $14.94SFR 031-121-051 $14.94SFR 031-121-052 $14.94SFR 031-121-053 $7.46VSFR 031-121-054 $14.94SFR 031-121-055 $14.94SFR 031-121-056 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-121-057 $7.46VSFR 031-121-058 $7.46VSFR 031-122-003 $7.46VSFR 031-122-007 $7.46VSFR 031-122-008 $14.94SFR 031-122-011 $7.46VSFR 031-122-013 $14.94SFR 031-122-014 $14.94SFR 031-122-015 $7.46VSFR 031-122-016 $7.46VSFR 031-122-017 $14.94SFR 031-131-001 $7.46VSFR 031-131-003 $14.94SFR 031-131-004 $7.46VSFR 031-131-009 $7.46VSFR 031-131-013 $7.46VSFR 031-131-016 $7.46VSFR 031-131-017 $7.46VSFR 031-131-020 $7.46VSFR 031-131-021 $7.46VSFR 031-131-024 $7.46VSFR 031-131-025 $7.46VSFR 031-131-028 $14.94SFR 031-131-029 $14.94SFR 031-131-036 $14.94SFR 031-131-037 $7.46VSFR 031-131-038 $14.94SFR 031-131-039 $7.46VSFR 031-131-041 $14.94SFR 031-131-043 $14.94SFR 031-131-044 $14.94SFR 031-131-045 $14.94SFR 031-131-046 $14.94SFR 031-131-047 $14.94SFR 031-131-048 $7.46VSFR 031-131-049 $7.46VSFR 031-131-050 $7.46VSFR 031-131-051 $14.94SFR 031-131-052 $14.94SFR 031-131-053 $14.94SFR 031-132-005 $7.46VSFR 031-132-006 $7.46VSFR 031-132-007 $7.46VSFR 031-132-009 $7.46VSFR 031-132-010 $14.94SFR 031-132-013 $14.94SFR 031-132-014 $7.46VSFR 031-132-017 $14.94SFR 031-132-018 $7.46VSFR 031-132-021 $14.94SFR 031-132-022 $14.94SFR 031-132-023 $7.46VSFR - 35 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-132-024 $14.94SFR 031-132-025 $14.94SFR 031-132-026 $14.94SFR 031-132-027 $14.94SFR 031-140-007 $7.46VSFR 031-140-011 $7.46VSFR 031-140-012 $14.94SFR 031-140-016 $7.46VSFR 031-140-024 $7.46VSFR 031-140-025 $7.46VSFR 031-140-028 $7.46VSFR 031-140-029 $7.46VSFR 031-140-032 $7.46VSFR 031-140-033 $7.46VSFR 031-140-036 $7.46VSFR 031-140-037 $7.46VSFR 031-140-040 $7.46VSFR 031-140-041 $7.46VSFR 031-140-044 $7.46VSFR 031-140-045 $7.46VSFR 031-140-055 $14.94SFR 031-140-056 $14.94SFR 031-140-057 $14.94SFR 031-140-058 $14.94SFR 031-140-059 $14.94SFR 031-140-060 $14.94SFR 031-140-061 $7.46VSFR 031-140-062 $14.94SFR 031-140-063 $14.94SFR 031-140-064 $14.94SFR 031-140-065 $74.70COM 031-140-066 $14.94SFR 031-140-067 $14.94SFR 031-140-068 $14.94SFR 031-140-069 $14.94SFR 031-140-070 $14.94SFR 031-140-071 $14.94SFR 031-140-072 $7.46VSFR 031-140-073 $14.94SFR 031-140-074 $14.94SFR 031-140-075 $7.46VSFR 031-140-076 $14.94SFR 031-140-077 $14.94SFR 031-140-078 $14.94SFR 031-160-001 $7.46VSFR 031-160-002 $7.46VSFR 031-160-003 $7.46VSFR 031-160-004 $7.46VSFR 031-160-005 $7.46VSFR 031-160-006 $7.46VSFR 031-160-007 $7.46VSFR 031-160-008 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-160-009 $7.46VSFR 031-160-010 $7.46VSFR 031-160-011 $7.46VSFR 031-160-012 $7.46VSFR 031-160-013 $7.46VSFR 031-160-014 $7.46VSFR 031-160-015 $7.46VSFR 031-160-016 $7.46VSFR 031-160-017 $7.46VSFR 031-160-018 $7.46VSFR 031-160-019 $7.46VSFR 031-160-020 $7.46VSFR 031-160-021 $7.46VSFR 031-160-022 $7.46VSFR 031-160-023 $7.46VSFR 031-160-024 $7.46VSFR 031-160-025 $7.46VSFR 031-160-026 $7.46VSFR 031-160-027 $7.46VSFR 031-160-028 $7.46VSFR 031-160-029 $7.46VSFR 031-160-030 $7.46VSFR 031-160-031 $7.46VSFR 031-160-032 $7.46VSFR 031-160-033 $7.46VSFR 031-160-034 $7.46VSFR 031-160-035 $7.46VSFR 031-160-036 $7.46VSFR 031-160-037 $7.46VSFR 031-160-038 $7.46VSFR 031-160-039 $7.46VSFR 031-160-040 $7.46VSFR 031-160-041 $7.46VSFR 031-160-042 $7.46VSFR 031-160-043 $7.46VSFR 031-160-044 $7.46VSFR 031-170-001 $7.46VSFR 031-170-002 $7.46VSFR 031-170-003 $7.46VSFR 031-170-004 $7.46VSFR 031-170-005 $7.46VSFR 031-170-006 $7.46VSFR 031-170-007 $7.46VSFR 031-170-008 $7.46VSFR 031-170-009 $7.46VSFR 031-170-010 $7.46VSFR 031-170-011 $7.46VSFR 031-170-012 $7.46VSFR 031-170-013 $7.46VSFR 031-170-014 $7.46VSFR 031-170-015 $7.46VSFR 031-170-016 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-170-017 $7.46VSFR 031-170-018 $7.46VSFR 031-170-019 $7.46VSFR 031-170-020 $7.46VSFR 031-170-021 $7.46VSFR 031-170-022 $7.46VSFR 031-170-023 $7.46VSFR 031-170-024 $7.46VSFR 031-170-025 $7.46VSFR 031-170-026 $7.46VSFR 031-170-027 $7.46VSFR 031-170-028 $7.46VSFR 031-170-029 $7.46VSFR 031-170-030 $7.46VSFR 031-170-031 $7.46VSFR 031-170-032 $7.46VSFR 031-170-033 $7.46VSFR 031-170-034 $7.46VSFR 031-170-035 $7.46VSFR 031-170-036 $7.46VSFR 031-170-037 $7.46VSFR 031-170-038 $7.46VSFR 031-170-039 $7.46VSFR 031-170-040 $7.46VSFR 031-170-041 $7.46VSFR 031-170-042 $7.46VSFR 031-170-043 $7.46VSFR 031-170-044 $7.46VSFR 031-170-045 $7.46VSFR 031-180-001 $7.46VSFR 031-180-002 $7.46VSFR 031-180-003 $7.46VSFR 031-180-004 $7.46VSFR 031-180-005 $7.46VSFR 031-180-006 $7.46VSFR 031-180-007 $7.46VSFR 031-180-008 $7.46VSFR 031-180-009 $7.46VSFR 031-180-010 $7.46VSFR 031-180-011 $7.46VSFR 031-180-012 $7.46VSFR 031-180-013 $7.46VSFR 031-180-014 $7.46VSFR 031-180-015 $7.46VSFR 031-180-016 $7.46VSFR 031-180-017 $7.46VSFR 031-180-018 $7.46VSFR 031-180-019 $7.46VSFR 031-180-020 $7.46VSFR 031-180-021 $7.46VSFR 031-180-022 $7.46VSFR 031-180-023 $7.46VSFR - 36 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-180-024 $7.46VSFR 031-180-025 $7.46VSFR 031-180-026 $7.46VSFR 031-180-027 $7.46VSFR 031-180-028 $7.46VSFR 031-180-029 $7.46VSFR 031-180-030 $7.46VSFR 031-180-031 $7.46VSFR 031-180-032 $7.46VSFR 031-180-033 $7.46VSFR 031-180-034 $7.46VSFR 031-180-035 $7.46VSFR 031-180-036 $7.46VSFR 031-180-037 $7.46VSFR 031-180-038 $7.46VSFR 031-180-039 $7.46VSFR 031-180-040 $7.46VSFR 031-180-041 $7.46VSFR 031-180-042 $7.46VSFR 031-180-043 $7.46VSFR 031-180-044 $7.46VSFR 031-180-045 $7.46VSFR 031-180-046 $7.46VSFR 031-180-047 $7.46VSFR 031-180-048 $7.46VSFR 031-180-049 $7.46VSFR 031-180-050 $7.46VSFR 031-180-051 $7.46VSFR 031-180-052 $7.46VSFR 031-180-053 $7.46VSFR 031-180-054 $7.46VSFR 031-180-055 $7.46VSFR 031-180-056 $7.46VSFR 031-180-057 $7.46VSFR 031-190-001 $7.46VSFR 031-190-002 $7.46VSFR 031-190-003 $7.46VSFR 031-190-004 $7.46VSFR 031-190-005 $7.46VSFR 031-190-006 $7.46VSFR 031-190-007 $7.46VSFR 031-190-008 $7.46VSFR 031-190-009 $7.46VSFR 031-190-010 $7.46VSFR 031-190-011 $7.46VSFR 031-190-012 $7.46VSFR 031-190-013 $7.46VSFR 031-190-014 $7.46VSFR 031-190-015 $7.46VSFR 031-190-016 $7.46VSFR 031-190-017 $7.46VSFR 031-190-018 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-190-019 $7.46VSFR 031-190-020 $7.46VSFR 031-190-021 $7.46VSFR 031-190-022 $7.46VSFR 031-190-023 $7.46VSFR 031-190-024 $7.46VSFR 031-190-025 $7.46VSFR 031-190-026 $7.46VSFR 031-190-027 $7.46VSFR 031-190-028 $7.46VSFR 031-190-029 $7.46VSFR 031-190-030 $7.46VSFR 031-190-031 $7.46VSFR 031-190-032 $7.46VSFR 031-200-001 $7.46VSFR 031-200-002 $7.46VSFR 031-200-003 $7.46VSFR 031-200-004 $7.46VSFR 031-200-005 $7.46VSFR 031-200-006 $7.46VSFR 031-200-007 $7.46VSFR 031-200-008 $7.46VSFR 031-200-009 $7.46VSFR 031-200-010 $7.46VSFR 031-200-011 $7.46VSFR 031-200-012 $7.46VSFR 031-200-013 $7.46VSFR 031-200-014 $7.46VSFR 031-200-015 $7.46VSFR 031-200-016 $7.46VSFR 031-200-017 $7.46VSFR 031-200-018 $7.46VSFR 031-200-019 $7.46VSFR 031-200-020 $7.46VSFR 031-200-021 $7.46VSFR 031-200-022 $7.46VSFR 031-200-023 $7.46VSFR 031-200-024 $7.46VSFR 031-200-025 $7.46VSFR 031-200-026 $7.46VSFR 031-200-027 $7.46VSFR 031-200-028 $7.46VSFR 031-200-029 $7.46VSFR 031-200-030 $7.46VSFR 031-200-031 $7.46VSFR 031-200-032 $7.46VSFR 031-200-033 $7.46VSFR 031-200-034 $7.46VSFR 031-200-035 $7.46VSFR 031-200-036 $7.46VSFR 031-200-037 $7.46VSFR 031-200-038 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-200-039 $7.46VSFR 031-200-040 $7.46VSFR 031-200-041 $7.46VSFR 031-200-042 $7.46VSFR 031-200-043 $7.46VSFR 031-200-044 $7.46VSFR 031-200-045 $7.46VSFR 031-200-046 $7.46VSFR 031-200-047 $7.46VSFR 031-200-048 $7.46VSFR 031-210-001 $7.46VSFR 031-210-002 $7.46VSFR 031-210-003 $7.46VSFR 031-210-004 $7.46VSFR 031-210-005 $7.46VSFR 031-210-006 $7.46VSFR 031-210-007 $7.46VSFR 031-210-008 $7.46VSFR 031-210-009 $7.46VSFR 031-210-010 $7.46VSFR 031-210-011 $7.46VSFR 031-210-012 $7.46VSFR 031-210-013 $7.46VSFR 031-210-014 $7.46VSFR 031-210-015 $7.46VSFR 031-210-016 $7.46VSFR 031-210-017 $7.46VSFR 031-210-018 $7.46VSFR 031-210-019 $7.46VSFR 031-210-020 $7.46VSFR 031-210-021 $7.46VSFR 031-210-022 $7.46VSFR 031-210-023 $7.46VSFR 031-210-024 $7.46VSFR 031-210-025 $7.46VSFR 031-210-026 $7.46VSFR 031-210-027 $7.46VSFR 031-210-028 $7.46VSFR 031-210-029 $7.46VSFR 031-210-030 $7.46VSFR 031-210-031 $7.46VSFR 031-210-032 $7.46VSFR 031-210-033 $7.46VSFR 031-210-034 $7.46VSFR 031-210-035 $7.46VSFR 031-210-036 $7.46VSFR 031-210-037 $7.46VSFR 031-210-038 $7.46VSFR 031-210-039 $7.46VSFR 031-210-040 $7.46VSFR 031-210-041 $7.46VSFR 031-210-042 $7.46VSFR - 37 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-210-043 $7.46VSFR 031-210-044 $7.46VSFR 031-210-045 $7.46VSFR 031-210-046 $7.46VSFR 031-210-047 $7.46VSFR 031-210-048 $7.46VSFR 031-210-049 $7.46VSFR 031-210-050 $7.46VSFR 031-210-051 $7.46VSFR 031-210-052 $7.46VSFR 031-210-053 $7.46VSFR 031-210-054 $7.46VSFR 031-210-055 $7.46VSFR 031-210-056 $7.46VSFR 031-210-057 $7.46VSFR 031-210-058 $7.46VSFR 031-210-059 $7.46VSFR 031-220-001 $7.46VSFR 031-220-002 $7.46VSFR 031-220-003 $7.46VSFR 031-220-004 $7.46VSFR 031-220-005 $7.46VSFR 031-220-006 $7.46VSFR 031-220-007 $7.46VSFR 031-220-008 $7.46VSFR 031-220-009 $7.46VSFR 031-220-010 $7.46VSFR 031-220-011 $7.46VSFR 031-220-012 $7.46VSFR 031-220-013 $7.46VSFR 031-220-014 $7.46VSFR 031-220-015 $7.46VSFR 031-220-016 $7.46VSFR 031-220-017 $7.46VSFR 031-220-018 $7.46VSFR 031-220-019 $7.46VSFR 031-220-020 $7.46VSFR 031-220-021 $7.46VSFR 031-220-022 $7.46VSFR 031-220-023 $7.46VSFR 031-220-024 $7.46VSFR 031-220-025 $7.46VSFR 031-220-026 $7.46VSFR 031-220-027 $7.46VSFR 031-220-028 $7.46VSFR 031-220-029 $7.46VSFR 031-220-030 $7.46VSFR 031-220-031 $7.46VSFR 031-220-032 $7.46VSFR 031-220-033 $7.46VSFR 031-220-034 $7.46VSFR 031-220-035 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-220-036 $7.46VSFR 031-220-037 $7.46VSFR 031-220-038 $7.46VSFR 031-220-039 $7.46VSFR 031-220-040 $7.46VSFR 031-220-041 $7.46VSFR 031-220-042 $7.46VSFR 031-220-043 $7.46VSFR 031-220-044 $7.46VSFR 031-220-045 $7.46VSFR 031-220-046 $7.46VSFR 031-220-047 $7.46VSFR 031-220-048 $7.46VSFR 031-220-049 $7.46VSFR 031-220-050 $7.46VSFR 031-220-051 $7.46VSFR 031-230-001 $7.46VSFR 031-230-002 $7.46VSFR 031-230-003 $7.46VSFR 031-230-004 $7.46VSFR 031-230-005 $7.46VSFR 031-230-006 $7.46VSFR 031-230-007 $7.46VSFR 031-230-008 $7.46VSFR 031-230-009 $7.46VSFR 031-230-010 $7.46VSFR 031-230-011 $7.46VSFR 031-230-012 $7.46VSFR 031-230-013 $7.46VSFR 031-230-014 $7.46VSFR 031-230-015 $7.46VSFR 031-230-016 $7.46VSFR 031-230-017 $7.46VSFR 031-230-018 $7.46VSFR 031-230-019 $7.46VSFR 031-230-020 $7.46VSFR 031-230-021 $7.46VSFR 031-230-022 $7.46VSFR 031-230-023 $7.46VSFR 031-230-024 $7.46VSFR 031-230-025 $7.46VSFR 031-230-026 $7.46VSFR 031-230-027 $7.46VSFR 031-230-028 $7.46VSFR 031-230-029 $7.46VSFR 031-230-030 $7.46VSFR 031-230-031 $7.46VSFR 031-230-032 $7.46VSFR 031-230-033 $7.46VSFR 031-230-034 $7.46VSFR 031-230-035 $7.46VSFR 031-230-036 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-230-037 $7.46VSFR 031-230-038 $7.46VSFR 031-230-039 $7.46VSFR 031-230-040 $7.46VSFR 031-230-041 $7.46VSFR 031-230-042 $7.46VSFR 031-230-043 $7.46VSFR 031-230-044 $7.46VSFR 031-230-045 $7.46VSFR 031-230-046 $7.46VSFR 031-230-047 $7.46VSFR 031-230-048 $7.46VSFR 031-230-049 $7.46VSFR 031-230-050 $7.46VSFR 031-230-051 $7.46VSFR 031-230-052 $7.46VSFR 031-230-053 $7.46VSFR 031-230-054 $7.46VSFR 031-230-055 $7.46VSFR 031-230-056 $7.46VSFR 031-230-057 $7.46VSFR 031-230-058 $7.46VSFR 031-230-059 $7.46VSFR 031-230-060 $7.46VSFR 031-230-061 $7.46VSFR 031-230-062 $7.46VSFR 031-230-063 $7.46VSFR 031-230-064 $7.46VSFR 031-230-065 $7.46VSFR 031-230-066 $7.46VSFR 031-230-067 $7.46VSFR 031-230-068 $7.46VSFR 031-240-001 $7.46VSFR 031-240-002 $7.46VSFR 031-240-003 $7.46VSFR 031-240-004 $7.46VSFR 031-240-005 $7.46VSFR 031-240-006 $7.46VSFR 031-240-007 $7.46VSFR 031-240-008 $7.46VSFR 031-240-009 $7.46VSFR 031-240-010 $7.46VSFR 031-240-011 $7.46VSFR 031-240-012 $7.46VSFR 031-240-013 $7.46VSFR 031-240-014 $7.46VSFR 031-240-015 $7.46VSFR 031-240-016 $7.46VSFR 031-240-017 $7.46VSFR 031-240-018 $7.46VSFR 031-240-019 $7.46VSFR 031-240-020 $7.46VSFR - 38 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-240-021 $7.46VSFR 031-240-022 $7.46VSFR 031-240-023 $7.46VSFR 031-240-024 $7.46VSFR 031-240-025 $7.46VSFR 031-240-026 $7.46VSFR 031-240-027 $7.46VSFR 031-240-028 $7.46VSFR 031-240-029 $7.46VSFR 031-240-030 $7.46VSFR 031-240-031 $7.46VSFR 031-240-032 $7.46VSFR 031-240-033 $7.46VSFR 031-240-034 $7.46VSFR 031-240-035 $7.46VSFR 031-240-036 $7.46VSFR 031-240-037 $7.46VSFR 031-240-038 $7.46VSFR 031-240-039 $7.46VSFR 031-240-040 $7.46VSFR 031-240-041 $7.46VSFR 031-240-042 $7.46VSFR 031-240-043 $7.46VSFR 031-240-044 $7.46VSFR 031-240-045 $7.46VSFR 031-240-046 $7.46VSFR 031-240-047 $7.46VSFR 031-240-048 $7.46VSFR 031-240-049 $7.46VSFR 031-240-050 $7.46VSFR 031-240-051 $7.46VSFR 031-240-052 $7.46VSFR 031-240-053 $7.46VSFR 031-240-054 $7.46VSFR 031-240-055 $7.46VSFR 031-240-056 $7.46VSFR 031-240-057 $7.46VSFR 031-240-058 $7.46VSFR 031-240-059 $7.46VSFR 031-240-060 $7.46VSFR 031-240-061 $7.46VSFR 031-240-062 $7.46VSFR 031-240-063 $7.46VSFR 031-240-064 $7.46VSFR 031-240-065 $7.46VSFR 031-240-066 $7.46VSFR 031-240-067 $7.46VSFR 031-240-068 $7.46VSFR 031-240-069 $7.46VSFR 031-240-070 $7.46VSFR 031-240-071 $7.46VSFR 031-240-072 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 031-250-001 $7.46VSFR 031-250-002 $7.46VSFR 031-250-003 $7.46VSFR 031-250-004 $7.46VSFR 031-250-005 $7.46VSFR 031-250-006 $7.46VSFR 031-250-007 $7.46VSFR 031-250-008 $7.46VSFR 031-260-001 $7.46VSFR 031-260-002 $7.46VSFR 031-260-003 $7.46VSFR 031-260-004 $7.46VSFR 031-260-005 $7.46VSFR 031-260-006 $7.46VSFR 031-260-007 $7.46VSFR 031-260-008 $7.46VSFR 031-260-009 $7.46VSFR 031-260-010 $7.46VSFR 031-260-011 $7.46VSFR 032-112-007 $7.46MISC 032-112-008 $7.46MISC 032-351-001 $7.46CONDO 032-351-002 $7.46CONDO 032-351-003 $7.46CONDO 032-351-004 $7.46CONDO 032-351-005 $7.46CONDO 032-351-006 $7.46CONDO 032-351-007 $7.46CONDO 032-351-008 $7.46CONDO 032-351-009 $7.46CONDO 032-351-010 $7.46CONDO 032-351-011 $7.46CONDO 032-351-012 $7.46CONDO 032-351-013 $7.46CONDO 032-351-014 $7.46CONDO 032-351-015 $7.46CONDO 032-351-016 $7.46CONDO 032-351-017 $7.46CONDO 032-351-018 $7.46CONDO 032-351-019 $7.46CONDO 032-351-020 $7.46CONDO 032-351-021 $7.46CONDO 032-351-022 $7.46CONDO 032-351-023 $7.46CONDO 032-351-024 $7.46CONDO 032-351-025 $7.46CONDO 032-351-026 $7.46CONDO 032-351-027 $7.46CONDO 032-351-028 $7.46CONDO 032-351-029 $7.46CONDO 032-351-030 $7.46CONDO 032-351-031 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 032-351-032 $7.46CONDO 032-351-033 $7.46CONDO 032-351-034 $7.46CONDO 032-351-035 $7.46CONDO 032-351-036 $7.46CONDO 032-351-037 $7.46CONDO 032-351-038 $7.46CONDO 032-351-039 $7.46CONDO 032-351-040 $7.46CONDO 032-351-041 $7.46CONDO 032-351-042 $7.46CONDO 032-351-043 $7.46CONDO 032-351-044 $7.46CONDO 032-351-045 $7.46CONDO 032-351-046 $7.46CONDO 032-351-047 $7.46CONDO 032-351-048 $7.46CONDO 032-351-049 $7.46CONDO 032-351-050 $7.46CONDO 032-351-051 $7.46CONDO 032-351-052 $7.46CONDO 032-351-053 $7.46CONDO 032-351-054 $7.46CONDO 032-351-055 $7.46CONDO 032-351-056 $7.46CONDO 032-351-057 $7.46CONDO 032-351-058 $7.46CONDO 032-351-059 $7.46CONDO 032-351-060 $7.46CONDO 032-351-061 $7.46CONDO 032-351-062 $7.46CONDO 032-351-063 $7.46CONDO 032-351-064 $7.46CONDO 032-351-065 $7.46CONDO 032-351-066 $7.46CONDO 032-351-067 $7.46CONDO 032-351-068 $7.46CONDO 032-351-069 $7.46CONDO 032-351-070 $7.46CONDO 032-351-071 $7.46CONDO 032-351-072 $7.46CONDO 032-351-073 $7.46CONDO 032-351-074 $7.46CONDO 032-351-075 $7.46CONDO 032-351-076 $7.46CONDO 032-351-077 $7.46CONDO 032-351-078 $7.46CONDO 032-351-079 $7.46CONDO 032-351-080 $7.46CONDO 032-361-001 $7.46CONDO 032-361-002 $7.46CONDO 032-361-003 $7.46CONDO - 39 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 032-361-004 $7.46CONDO 032-361-005 $7.46CONDO 032-361-006 $7.46CONDO 032-361-007 $7.46CONDO 032-361-008 $7.46CONDO 032-361-009 $7.46CONDO 032-362-001 $7.46CONDO 032-362-002 $7.46CONDO 032-362-003 $7.46CONDO 032-362-004 $7.46CONDO 032-362-005 $7.46CONDO 032-362-006 $7.46CONDO 032-362-007 $7.46CONDO 032-362-008 $7.46CONDO 032-362-009 $7.46CONDO 032-362-010 $7.46CONDO 032-362-011 $7.46CONDO 032-363-001 $7.46CONDO 032-363-002 $7.46CONDO 032-363-003 $7.46CONDO 032-363-004 $7.46CONDO 032-363-005 $7.46CONDO 032-363-006 $7.46CONDO 032-363-007 $7.46CONDO 032-363-008 $7.46CONDO 032-363-009 $7.46CONDO 032-363-010 $7.46CONDO 032-363-011 $7.46CONDO 032-363-012 $7.46CONDO 032-363-013 $7.46CONDO 032-363-014 $7.46CONDO 032-363-015 $7.46CONDO 032-363-016 $7.46CONDO 032-363-017 $7.46CONDO 032-363-018 $7.46CONDO 032-363-019 $7.46CONDO 032-363-020 $7.46CONDO 032-363-021 $7.46CONDO 032-363-022 $7.46CONDO 032-363-023 $7.46CONDO 032-363-024 $7.46CONDO 032-363-025 $7.46CONDO 032-363-026 $7.46CONDO 032-363-027 $7.46CONDO 032-363-028 $7.46CONDO 032-363-029 $7.46CONDO 032-363-030 $7.46CONDO 032-363-031 $7.46CONDO 032-363-032 $7.46CONDO 032-363-033 $7.46CONDO 032-363-034 $7.46CONDO 032-363-035 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 032-363-036 $7.46CONDO 032-363-037 $7.46CONDO 032-363-038 $7.46CONDO 032-363-039 $7.46CONDO 032-363-040 $7.46CONDO 032-363-041 $7.46CONDO 032-363-042 $7.46CONDO 032-363-043 $7.46CONDO 032-363-044 $7.46CONDO 032-363-045 $7.46CONDO 032-363-046 $7.46CONDO 032-363-047 $7.46CONDO 032-363-048 $7.46CONDO 032-363-049 $7.46CONDO 032-363-050 $7.46CONDO 032-363-051 $7.46CONDO 032-363-052 $7.46CONDO 032-363-053 $7.46CONDO 032-363-054 $7.46CONDO 032-363-055 $7.46CONDO 032-363-056 $7.46CONDO 032-363-057 $7.46CONDO 032-363-058 $7.46CONDO 032-363-059 $7.46CONDO 032-363-060 $7.46CONDO 032-363-061 $7.46CONDO 032-363-062 $7.46CONDO 037-180-015 $74.70VIND 091-030-010 $74.70COM 093-010-004 $14.94SFR 093-011-003 $14.94SFR 093-011-004 $14.94SFR 093-011-005 $14.94SFR 093-011-006 $14.94SFR 093-011-007 $14.94SFR 093-011-009 $14.94SFR 093-011-010 $14.94SFR 093-021-005 $14.94SFR 093-021-006 $14.94SFR 093-021-008 $14.94SFR 093-021-009 $14.94SFR 093-021-010 $14.94SFR 093-021-011 $14.94SFR 093-021-012 $14.94SFR 093-021-013 $14.94SFR 093-021-014 $14.94SFR 093-021-015 $14.94SFR 093-021-016 $14.94SFR 093-021-017 $14.94SFR 093-021-018 $14.94SFR 093-021-019 $14.94SFR 093-021-020 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-021-021 $14.94SFR 093-021-022 $14.94SFR 093-021-023 $14.94SFR 093-021-024 $14.94SFR 093-021-025 $14.94SFR 093-021-026 $14.94SFR 093-021-027 $14.94SFR 093-021-028 $14.94SFR 093-021-029 $14.94SFR 093-021-030 $14.94SFR 093-021-031 $14.94SFR 093-021-032 $14.94SFR 093-021-033 $14.94SFR 093-021-034 $14.94SFR 093-021-035 $14.94SFR 093-021-036 $14.94SFR 093-021-037 $14.94SFR 093-021-038 $14.94SFR 093-021-039 $14.94SFR 093-021-040 $14.94SFR 093-021-041 $14.94SFR 093-021-042 $14.94SFR 093-021-043 $14.94SFR 093-021-044 $14.94SFR 093-021-045 $14.94SFR 093-021-046 $14.94SFR 093-021-047 $14.94SFR 093-021-053 $74.70COM 093-022-001 $14.94SFR 093-022-002 $14.94SFR 093-022-003 $14.94SFR 093-022-004 $14.94SFR 093-022-005 $14.94SFR 093-022-006 $14.94SFR 093-022-007 $14.94SFR 093-022-008 $14.94SFR 093-022-009 $14.94SFR 093-022-010 $14.94SFR 093-022-011 $14.94SFR 093-022-012 $14.94SFR 093-022-013 $14.94SFR 093-022-014 $14.94SFR 093-022-015 $14.94SFR 093-022-016 $14.94SFR 093-022-017 $14.94SFR 093-022-018 $14.94SFR 093-022-019 $14.94SFR 093-022-020 $14.94SFR 093-022-021 $14.94SFR 093-022-022 $14.94SFR 093-022-023 $14.94SFR 093-022-024 $14.94SFR - 40 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-022-025 $14.94SFR 093-022-026 $14.94SFR 093-022-027 $14.94SFR 093-022-028 $14.94SFR 093-022-029 $14.94SFR 093-022-030 $14.94SFR 093-022-031 $14.94SFR 093-022-032 $14.94SFR 093-022-033 $14.94SFR 093-022-034 $14.94SFR 093-022-035 $14.94SFR 093-022-036 $14.94SFR 093-022-037 $14.94SFR 093-022-038 $14.94SFR 093-022-039 $14.94SFR 093-022-040 $14.94SFR 093-031-001 $14.94SFR 093-031-002 $14.94SFR 093-031-003 $14.94SFR 093-031-006 $14.94SFR 093-031-007 $14.94SFR 093-031-008 $14.94SFR 093-031-009 $14.94SFR 093-031-010 $14.94SFR 093-031-011 $14.94SFR 093-031-012 $14.94SFR 093-031-013 $14.94SFR 093-031-014 $14.94SFR 093-031-019 $14.94SFR 093-032-013 $14.94SFR 093-032-014 $14.94SFR 093-032-015 $14.94SFR 093-032-016 $14.94SFR 093-032-017 $14.94SFR 093-032-018 $14.94SFR 093-032-019 $14.94SFR 093-032-020 $44.82MFR 093-032-021 $14.94SFR 093-032-022 $14.94SFR 093-032-023 $14.94SFR 093-032-024 $14.94SFR 093-032-025 $14.94SFR 093-032-026 $14.94SFR 093-032-027 $14.94SFR 093-032-028 $44.82MFR 093-032-029 $74.70MFR5 093-032-030 $29.88MFR2 093-032-031 $44.82MFR 093-032-032 $29.88MFR2 093-032-033 $29.88MFR2 093-032-034 $14.94SFR 093-032-035 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-032-036 $14.94SFR 093-032-037 $14.94SFR 093-032-038 $14.94SFR 093-034-016 $14.94SFR 093-034-017 $14.94SFR 093-034-018 $14.94SFR 093-034-019 $14.94SFR 093-034-020 $14.94SFR 093-034-021 $14.94SFR 093-034-022 $14.94SFR 093-034-023 $14.94SFR 093-034-024 $14.94SFR 093-034-025 $14.94SFR 093-034-026 $14.94SFR 093-034-027 $14.94SFR 093-034-028 $14.94SFR 093-034-029 $14.94SFR 093-034-030 $14.94SFR 093-034-031 $14.94SFR 093-034-032 $14.94SFR 093-034-033 $14.94SFR 093-034-034 $14.94SFR 093-034-035 $14.94SFR 093-034-036 $14.94SFR 093-034-037 $14.94SFR 093-034-038 $14.94SFR 093-034-039 $14.94SFR 093-034-040 $14.94SFR 093-034-041 $14.94SFR 093-034-042 $14.94SFR 093-034-043 $14.94SFR 093-034-044 $14.94SFR 093-034-045 $14.94SFR 093-034-046 $14.94SFR 093-034-047 $14.94SFR 093-034-048 $14.94SFR 093-036-002 $14.94SFR 093-036-003 $14.94SFR 093-036-004 $14.94SFR 093-036-005 $14.94SFR 093-036-010 $7.46VMFR 093-036-013 $14.94SFR 093-036-014 $7.46VMFR 093-036-015 $7.46VSFR 093-036-016 $14.94SFR 093-037-001 $74.70MFR5 093-037-002 $14.94SFR 093-037-003 $14.94SFR 093-037-004 $14.94SFR 093-037-005 $14.94SFR 093-037-006 $14.94SFR 093-037-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-038-013 $7.46VSFR 093-038-014 $14.94SFR 093-038-015 $14.94SFR 093-038-016 $14.94SFR 093-038-017 $14.94SFR 093-038-018 $14.94SFR 093-038-019 $14.94SFR 093-038-020 $14.94SFR 093-038-021 $14.94SFR 093-038-022 $14.94SFR 093-038-023 $14.94SFR 093-038-024 $29.88MFR2 093-038-025 $29.88MFR2 093-041-002 $14.94SFR 093-041-003 $14.94SFR 093-041-004 $14.94SFR 093-041-005 $29.88MFR2 093-041-006 $14.94SFR 093-041-007 $14.94SFR 093-041-008 $14.94SFR 093-041-009 $89.64MFR6 093-041-010 $74.70INST 093-041-011 $14.94SFR 093-041-012 $14.94SFR 093-041-014 $7.46VSFR 093-041-015 $74.70MFR5 093-041-016 $74.70MFR5 093-042-001 $44.82MFR 093-042-002 $14.94SFR 093-042-003 $14.94SFR 093-042-004 $14.94SFR 093-042-005 $14.94SFR 093-042-006 $14.94SFR 093-042-007 $14.94SFR 093-042-008 $14.94SFR 093-042-011 $14.94SFR 093-042-012 $14.94SFR 093-042-013 $14.94SFR 093-042-014 $14.94SFR 093-042-015 $14.94SFR 093-042-016 $14.94SFR 093-042-017 $14.94SFR 093-042-018 $14.94SFR 093-042-019 $14.94SFR 093-042-020 $14.94SFR 093-042-021 $59.76MFR4 093-042-023 $14.94SFR 093-043-001 $14.94SFR 093-043-002 $14.94SFR 093-043-004 $14.94SFR 093-043-005 $14.94SFR 093-043-006 $14.94SFR - 41 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-043-007 $14.94SFR 093-043-008 $14.94SFR 093-043-009 $14.94SFR 093-043-010 $14.94SFR 093-043-011 $14.94SFR 093-043-012 $14.94SFR 093-043-013 $14.94SFR 093-043-014 $14.94SFR 093-043-015 $14.94SFR 093-043-016 $14.94SFR 093-043-017 $44.82MFR 093-043-018 $14.94SFR 093-043-019 $14.94SFR 093-043-020 $14.94SFR 093-043-021 $14.94SFR 093-043-022 $14.94SFR 093-043-023 $14.94SFR 093-043-024 $14.94SFR 093-043-025 $14.94SFR 093-050-004 $14.94SFR 093-050-006 $14.94SFR 093-050-011 $14.94SFR 093-050-012 $29.88MFR2 093-050-013 $14.94SFR 093-050-014 $74.70COM 093-050-015 $74.70COM 093-050-016 $74.70COM 093-061-005 $74.70COM 093-062-002 $74.70COM 093-071-001 $14.94SFR 093-071-002 $14.94SFR 093-071-003 $14.94SFR 093-071-004 $14.94SFR 093-071-005 $14.94SFR 093-071-006 $14.94SFR 093-071-007 $14.94SFR 093-071-008 $14.94SFR 093-071-009 $14.94SFR 093-071-010 $14.94SFR 093-071-011 $14.94SFR 093-071-012 $14.94SFR 093-071-013 $14.94SFR 093-071-014 $14.94SFR 093-071-015 $14.94SFR 093-071-016 $14.94SFR 093-071-017 $14.94SFR 093-071-018 $14.94SFR 093-071-019 $14.94SFR 093-071-020 $14.94SFR 093-071-021 $14.94SFR 093-071-022 $14.94SFR 093-071-023 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-071-024 $14.94SFR 093-071-025 $14.94SFR 093-071-026 $14.94SFR 093-071-027 $14.94SFR 093-072-001 $14.94SFR 093-072-002 $14.94SFR 093-072-003 $14.94SFR 093-072-004 $14.94SFR 093-072-005 $14.94SFR 093-072-006 $14.94SFR 093-072-007 $14.94SFR 093-072-008 $14.94SFR 093-073-001 $14.94SFR 093-073-002 $14.94SFR 093-073-003 $14.94SFR 093-073-004 $14.94SFR 093-073-005 $14.94SFR 093-073-006 $14.94SFR 093-073-007 $14.94SFR 093-073-008 $14.94SFR 093-073-009 $14.94SFR 093-073-010 $14.94SFR 093-073-011 $14.94SFR 093-073-012 $14.94SFR 093-074-001 $14.94SFR 093-074-002 $14.94SFR 093-074-003 $14.94SFR 093-074-004 $14.94SFR 093-074-005 $14.94SFR 093-074-006 $14.94SFR 093-074-007 $14.94SFR 093-074-008 $14.94SFR 093-074-009 $14.94SFR 093-074-010 $14.94SFR 093-074-011 $14.94SFR 093-074-012 $14.94SFR 093-074-013 $14.94SFR 093-074-014 $14.94SFR 093-074-015 $14.94SFR 093-074-016 $14.94SFR 093-081-005 $14.94SFR 093-081-006 $14.94SFR 093-081-007 $14.94SFR 093-081-008 $14.94SFR 093-081-009 $14.94SFR 093-081-010 $14.94SFR 093-081-011 $14.94SFR 093-081-012 $14.94SFR 093-081-013 $14.94SFR 093-081-014 $14.94SFR 093-081-015 $14.94SFR 093-081-016 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-081-017 $14.94SFR 093-081-018 $14.94SFR 093-081-019 $14.94SFR 093-081-020 $14.94SFR 093-081-021 $14.94SFR 093-081-022 $14.94SFR 093-081-023 $14.94SFR 093-081-026 $59.76MFR4 093-081-028 $7.46VCOM 093-081-029 $7.46VCOM 093-081-030 $74.70COM 093-081-031 $74.70COM 093-082-002 $14.94SFR 093-082-003 $14.94SFR 093-082-004 $14.94SFR 093-082-005 $14.94SFR 093-082-006 $59.76MFR4 093-082-008 $59.76MFR4 093-082-009 $59.76MFR4 093-082-010 $74.70INST 093-083-001 $14.94SFR 093-083-002 $14.94SFR 093-083-003 $14.94SFR 093-083-004 $14.94SFR 093-083-005 $14.94SFR 093-083-006 $14.94SFR 093-090-025 $119.52MFR8 093-090-026 $89.64MFR6 093-090-027 $74.70COM 093-090-028 $74.70COM 093-090-029 $14.94SFR 093-091-004 $14.94SFR 093-091-005 $14.94SFR 093-091-006 $14.94SFR 093-091-007 $14.94SFR 093-091-008 $14.94SFR 093-091-009 $44.82MFR 093-091-010 $14.94SFR 093-091-013 $14.94SFR 093-091-023 $7.46VMFR 093-091-024 $89.64MFR6 093-091-025 $89.64MFR6 093-091-026 $104.58MFR7 093-100-006 $119.52MFR8 093-100-050 $74.70INST 093-100-055 $74.70INST 093-100-059 $7.46VMFR 093-100-060 $7.46VMFR 093-111-001 $14.94SFR 093-111-002 $14.94SFR 093-111-013 $14.94SFR 093-111-014 $14.94SFR - 42 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-111-017 $14.94SFR 093-111-018 $14.94SFR 093-111-019 $14.94SFR 093-111-020 $14.94SFR 093-111-021 $14.94SFR 093-111-022 $14.94SFR 093-111-023 $14.94SFR 093-111-024 $14.94SFR 093-111-025 $14.94SFR 093-111-026 $14.94SFR 093-113-001 $14.94SFR 093-113-002 $14.94SFR 093-113-003 $14.94SFR 093-113-004 $14.94SFR 093-113-005 $14.94SFR 093-113-006 $14.94SFR 093-113-007 $14.94SFR 093-113-008 $14.94SFR 093-113-009 $14.94SFR 093-113-010 $14.94SFR 093-113-011 $14.94SFR 093-113-012 $14.94SFR 093-113-013 $14.94SFR 093-113-014 $14.94SFR 093-113-015 $14.94SFR 093-113-016 $14.94SFR 093-113-017 $14.94SFR 093-113-018 $14.94SFR 093-113-019 $14.94SFR 093-113-020 $14.94SFR 093-113-021 $14.94SFR 093-113-022 $14.94SFR 093-113-023 $14.94SFR 093-113-024 $14.94SFR 093-113-025 $14.94SFR 093-113-026 $14.94SFR 093-113-027 $14.94SFR 093-113-028 $14.94SFR 093-113-029 $14.94SFR 093-113-030 $14.94SFR 093-113-031 $14.94SFR 093-113-032 $14.94SFR 093-113-033 $14.94SFR 093-113-034 $14.94SFR 093-113-035 $14.94SFR 093-113-036 $14.94SFR 093-113-037 $14.94SFR 093-113-038 $14.94SFR 093-113-039 $14.94SFR 093-113-042 $14.94SFR 093-114-001 $14.94SFR 093-114-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-114-003 $14.94SFR 093-114-004 $14.94SFR 093-114-005 $14.94SFR 093-114-006 $14.94SFR 093-114-007 $14.94SFR 093-114-008 $14.94SFR 093-114-009 $14.94SFR 093-114-010 $14.94SFR 093-114-011 $14.94SFR 093-114-012 $14.94SFR 093-114-013 $14.94SFR 093-114-014 $14.94SFR 093-114-015 $14.94SFR 093-114-016 $14.94SFR 093-121-001 $7.46MISC 093-160-004 $14.94SFR 093-160-005 $7.46VSFR 093-160-006 $7.46VSFR 093-160-008 $14.94SFR 093-160-013 $14.94SFR 093-160-014 $14.94SFR 093-170-006 $14.94SFR 093-170-009 $14.94SFR 093-170-010 $14.94SFR 093-170-011 $14.94SFR 093-170-043 $74.70INST 093-170-044 $14.94SFR 093-170-055 $14.94SFR 093-170-057 $74.70INST 093-170-059 $44.82MFR 093-170-060 $74.70INST 093-170-061 $74.70COM 093-170-062 $74.70COM 093-170-063 $74.70COM 093-170-067 $74.70COM 093-170-069 $14.94SFR 093-170-071 $7.46VMFR 093-170-073 $74.70COM 093-170-075 $74.70COM 093-170-077 $14.94SFR 093-170-081 $74.70COM 093-181-001 $14.94SFR 093-181-002 $14.94SFR 093-181-003 $14.94SFR 093-181-004 $14.94SFR 093-181-005 $14.94SFR 093-181-006 $14.94SFR 093-181-007 $14.94SFR 093-181-008 $14.94SFR 093-181-009 $14.94SFR 093-181-010 $14.94SFR 093-181-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-181-012 $14.94SFR 093-181-013 $14.94SFR 093-181-014 $14.94SFR 093-181-015 $14.94SFR 093-182-001 $14.94SFR 093-182-002 $14.94SFR 093-182-003 $14.94SFR 093-182-004 $14.94SFR 093-182-005 $14.94SFR 093-182-006 $14.94SFR 093-182-007 $14.94SFR 093-182-008 $14.94SFR 093-182-009 $14.94SFR 093-182-010 $14.94SFR 093-182-011 $14.94SFR 093-182-012 $14.94SFR 093-183-001 $14.94SFR 093-183-002 $14.94SFR 093-183-003 $14.94SFR 093-183-004 $14.94SFR 093-183-005 $14.94SFR 093-183-006 $14.94SFR 093-183-007 $14.94SFR 093-183-008 $14.94SFR 093-183-009 $14.94SFR 093-183-010 $14.94SFR 093-183-011 $14.94SFR 093-183-012 $14.94SFR 093-183-013 $14.94SFR 093-184-001 $14.94SFR 093-184-002 $14.94SFR 093-184-003 $14.94SFR 093-184-004 $14.94SFR 093-184-005 $14.94SFR 093-184-006 $14.94SFR 093-184-007 $14.94SFR 093-184-008 $14.94SFR 093-184-009 $14.94SFR 093-184-010 $14.94SFR 093-184-011 $14.94SFR 093-184-012 $14.94SFR 093-184-013 $14.94SFR 093-184-014 $14.94SFR 093-184-015 $14.94SFR 093-184-016 $14.94SFR 093-184-017 $14.94SFR 093-184-018 $14.94SFR 093-191-001 $14.94SFR 093-191-002 $14.94SFR 093-191-003 $14.94SFR 093-191-004 $14.94SFR 093-191-005 $14.94SFR - 43 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-191-006 $14.94SFR 093-191-013 $14.94SFR 093-191-014 $14.94SFR 093-191-015 $14.94SFR 093-191-016 $14.94SFR 093-191-017 $14.94SFR 093-191-020 $14.94SFR 093-191-021 $14.94SFR 093-191-022 $14.94SFR 093-191-023 $74.70COM 093-191-024 $7.46VCOM 093-191-025 $7.46VCOM 093-191-026 $74.70COM 093-191-027 $14.94SFR 093-191-028 $14.94SFR 093-192-001 $14.94SFR 093-192-002 $14.94SFR 093-192-003 $14.94SFR 093-192-004 $14.94SFR 093-192-006 $14.94SFR 093-192-011 $14.94SFR 093-192-012 $14.94SFR 093-192-013 $14.94SFR 093-192-015 $14.94SFR 093-192-016 $14.94SFR 093-192-017 $14.94SFR 093-192-018 $14.94SFR 093-192-019 $29.88MFR2 093-192-021 $14.94SFR 093-192-025 $74.70COM 093-192-026 $7.46VCOM 093-192-027 $74.70COM 093-193-001 $14.94SFR 093-193-002 $7.46VSFR 093-193-003 $14.94SFR 093-193-004 $14.94SFR 093-193-005 $14.94SFR 093-193-007 $14.94SFR 093-193-008 $14.94SFR 093-193-009 $14.94SFR 093-193-014 $14.94SFR 093-193-017 $14.94SFR 093-193-018 $14.94SFR 093-193-019 $14.94SFR 093-193-021 $14.94SFR 093-193-022 $14.94SFR 093-193-023 $14.94SFR 093-193-024 $14.94SFR 093-193-025 $7.46VSFR 093-193-026 $14.94SFR 093-193-027 $14.94SFR 093-193-028 $74.70COM Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-193-029 $14.94SFR 093-193-030 $14.94SFR 093-193-034 $14.94SFR 093-201-001 $14.94SFR 093-201-002 $14.94SFR 093-201-003 $14.94SFR 093-201-004 $14.94SFR 093-201-005 $14.94SFR 093-201-006 $14.94SFR 093-201-007 $14.94SFR 093-201-008 $14.94SFR 093-201-009 $14.94SFR 093-201-010 $14.94SFR 093-201-011 $14.94SFR 093-201-012 $14.94SFR 093-201-013 $14.94SFR 093-201-014 $14.94SFR 093-201-015 $14.94SFR 093-201-016 $14.94SFR 093-201-017 $14.94SFR 093-201-018 $14.94SFR 093-201-019 $14.94SFR 093-201-020 $14.94SFR 093-201-021 $14.94SFR 093-201-022 $14.94SFR 093-201-023 $14.94SFR 093-201-024 $14.94SFR 093-201-025 $14.94SFR 093-201-026 $14.94SFR 093-201-027 $14.94SFR 093-201-028 $14.94SFR 093-201-029 $14.94SFR 093-201-030 $14.94SFR 093-201-031 $14.94SFR 093-201-032 $14.94SFR 093-201-033 $14.94SFR 093-201-034 $14.94SFR 093-202-001 $14.94SFR 093-202-002 $14.94SFR 093-202-003 $14.94SFR 093-202-004 $14.94SFR 093-202-005 $14.94SFR 093-202-006 $14.94SFR 093-202-007 $14.94SFR 093-202-008 $14.94SFR 093-202-009 $14.94SFR 093-203-001 $14.94SFR 093-203-002 $14.94SFR 093-203-003 $14.94SFR 093-203-004 $14.94SFR 093-203-005 $14.94SFR 093-203-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-203-007 $14.94SFR 093-203-008 $14.94SFR 093-203-009 $14.94SFR 093-203-010 $14.94SFR 093-203-011 $14.94SFR 093-203-012 $14.94SFR 093-203-013 $14.94SFR 093-203-014 $14.94SFR 093-203-015 $14.94SFR 093-203-016 $14.94SFR 093-203-017 $14.94SFR 093-203-018 $14.94SFR 093-203-019 $14.94SFR 093-203-020 $14.94SFR 093-203-021 $14.94SFR 093-203-022 $74.70INST 093-204-001 $14.94SFR 093-204-002 $14.94SFR 093-204-003 $14.94SFR 093-204-004 $14.94SFR 093-204-005 $14.94SFR 093-204-006 $14.94SFR 093-204-007 $14.94SFR 093-204-008 $14.94SFR 093-204-009 $14.94SFR 093-204-010 $14.94SFR 093-204-011 $14.94SFR 093-204-012 $14.94SFR 093-204-013 $14.94SFR 093-204-014 $14.94SFR 093-210-001 $7.46CONDO 093-210-002 $7.46CONDO 093-210-003 $7.46CONDO 093-210-004 $7.46CONDO 093-210-005 $7.46CONDO 093-210-006 $7.46CONDO 093-210-007 $7.46CONDO 093-210-008 $7.46CONDO 093-210-009 $7.46CONDO 093-210-010 $7.46CONDO 093-210-011 $7.46CONDO 093-210-012 $7.46CONDO 093-210-013 $7.46CONDO 093-210-014 $7.46CONDO 093-210-015 $7.46CONDO 093-210-016 $7.46CONDO 093-210-017 $7.46CONDO 093-210-018 $7.46CONDO 093-210-019 $7.46CONDO 093-210-020 $7.46CONDO 093-210-021 $7.46CONDO 093-210-022 $7.46CONDO - 44 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-210-023 $7.46CONDO 093-210-024 $7.46CONDO 093-210-025 $7.46CONDO 093-210-026 $7.46CONDO 093-210-027 $7.46CONDO 093-210-028 $7.46CONDO 093-210-029 $7.46CONDO 093-210-030 $7.46CONDO 093-210-031 $7.46CONDO 093-210-032 $7.46CONDO 093-210-033 $7.46CONDO 093-210-034 $7.46CONDO 093-210-035 $7.46CONDO 093-210-036 $7.46CONDO 093-210-037 $7.46CONDO 093-210-038 $7.46CONDO 093-210-039 $7.46CONDO 093-210-040 $7.46CONDO 093-210-041 $7.46CONDO 093-210-042 $7.46CONDO 093-210-043 $7.46CONDO 093-210-044 $7.46CONDO 093-210-045 $7.46CONDO 093-210-046 $7.46CONDO 093-210-047 $7.46CONDO 093-210-048 $7.46CONDO 093-210-049 $7.46CONDO 093-210-050 $7.46CONDO 093-210-051 $7.46CONDO 093-210-052 $7.46CONDO 093-220-001 $7.46CONDO 093-220-002 $7.46CONDO 093-220-003 $7.46CONDO 093-220-004 $7.46CONDO 093-220-005 $7.46CONDO 093-220-006 $7.46CONDO 093-220-007 $7.46CONDO 093-220-008 $7.46CONDO 093-220-009 $7.46CONDO 093-220-010 $7.46CONDO 093-220-011 $7.46CONDO 093-220-012 $7.46CONDO 093-220-013 $7.46CONDO 093-220-014 $7.46CONDO 093-220-015 $7.46CONDO 093-220-016 $7.46CONDO 093-220-017 $7.46CONDO 093-220-018 $7.46CONDO 093-220-019 $7.46CONDO 093-220-020 $7.46CONDO 093-220-021 $7.46CONDO 093-220-022 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-220-023 $7.46CONDO 093-220-024 $7.46CONDO 093-220-025 $7.46CONDO 093-220-026 $7.46CONDO 093-220-027 $7.46CONDO 093-220-028 $7.46CONDO 093-220-029 $7.46CONDO 093-220-030 $7.46CONDO 093-220-031 $7.46CONDO 093-220-032 $7.46CONDO 093-220-033 $7.46CONDO 093-220-034 $7.46CONDO 093-220-035 $7.46CONDO 093-220-036 $7.46CONDO 093-220-037 $7.46CONDO 093-220-038 $7.46CONDO 093-220-039 $7.46CONDO 093-220-040 $7.46CONDO 093-220-041 $7.46CONDO 093-220-042 $7.46CONDO 093-220-043 $7.46CONDO 093-220-044 $7.46CONDO 093-220-045 $7.46CONDO 093-220-046 $7.46CONDO 093-220-047 $7.46CONDO 093-220-048 $7.46CONDO 093-220-049 $7.46CONDO 093-220-050 $7.46CONDO 093-220-051 $7.46CONDO 093-220-052 $7.46CONDO 093-230-001 $7.46CONDO 093-230-002 $7.46CONDO 093-230-003 $7.46CONDO 093-230-004 $7.46CONDO 093-230-005 $7.46CONDO 093-230-006 $7.46CONDO 093-230-007 $7.46CONDO 093-230-008 $7.46CONDO 093-230-009 $7.46CONDO 093-230-010 $7.46CONDO 093-230-011 $7.46CONDO 093-230-012 $7.46CONDO 093-230-013 $7.46CONDO 093-230-014 $7.46CONDO 093-230-015 $7.46CONDO 093-230-016 $7.46CONDO 093-230-017 $7.46CONDO 093-230-018 $7.46CONDO 093-230-019 $7.46CONDO 093-230-020 $7.46CONDO 093-230-021 $7.46CONDO 093-230-022 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-230-023 $7.46CONDO 093-230-024 $7.46CONDO 093-230-025 $7.46CONDO 093-230-026 $7.46CONDO 093-230-027 $7.46CONDO 093-230-028 $7.46CONDO 093-230-029 $7.46CONDO 093-230-030 $7.46CONDO 093-230-031 $7.46CONDO 093-230-032 $7.46CONDO 093-230-033 $7.46CONDO 093-230-034 $7.46CONDO 093-230-035 $7.46CONDO 093-230-036 $7.46CONDO 093-230-037 $7.46CONDO 093-230-038 $7.46CONDO 093-230-039 $7.46CONDO 093-230-040 $7.46CONDO 093-230-041 $7.46CONDO 093-230-042 $7.46CONDO 093-230-043 $7.46CONDO 093-230-044 $7.46CONDO 093-230-045 $7.46CONDO 093-230-046 $7.46CONDO 093-230-047 $7.46CONDO 093-230-048 $7.46CONDO 093-230-049 $7.46CONDO 093-230-050 $7.46CONDO 093-230-051 $7.46CONDO 093-230-052 $7.46CONDO 093-230-053 $7.46CONDO 093-230-054 $7.46CONDO 093-230-055 $7.46CONDO 093-230-056 $7.46CONDO 093-230-057 $7.46CONDO 093-230-058 $7.46CONDO 093-300-001 $7.46CONDO 093-300-002 $7.46CONDO 093-300-003 $7.46CONDO 093-300-004 $7.46CONDO 093-300-005 $7.46CONDO 093-300-006 $7.46CONDO 093-300-007 $7.46CONDO 093-300-008 $7.46CONDO 093-300-009 $7.46CONDO 093-300-010 $7.46CONDO 093-300-011 $7.46CONDO 093-300-012 $7.46CONDO 093-300-013 $7.46CONDO 093-300-014 $7.46CONDO 093-300-015 $7.46CONDO 093-300-016 $7.46CONDO - 45 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-300-018 $7.46CONDO 093-300-019 $7.46CONDO 093-300-020 $7.46CONDO 093-300-021 $7.46CONDO 093-300-022 $7.46CONDO 093-300-023 $7.46CONDO 093-300-024 $7.46CONDO 093-300-025 $7.46CONDO 093-300-026 $7.46CONDO 093-300-027 $7.46CONDO 093-300-028 $7.46CONDO 093-300-029 $7.46CONDO 093-300-030 $7.46CONDO 093-300-031 $7.46CONDO 093-300-032 $7.46CONDO 093-300-033 $7.46CONDO 093-300-035 $7.46CONDO 093-300-036 $7.46CONDO 093-300-037 $7.46CONDO 093-300-038 $7.46CONDO 093-300-039 $7.46CONDO 093-300-040 $7.46CONDO 093-300-041 $7.46CONDO 093-300-042 $7.46CONDO 093-300-043 $7.46CONDO 093-300-044 $7.46CONDO 093-300-045 $7.46CONDO 093-300-046 $7.46CONDO 093-300-047 $7.46CONDO 093-300-048 $7.46CONDO 093-300-049 $7.46CONDO 093-300-050 $7.46CONDO 093-310-002 $7.46CONDO 093-310-003 $7.46CONDO 093-310-004 $7.46CONDO 093-310-005 $7.46CONDO 093-310-006 $7.46CONDO 093-310-007 $7.46CONDO 093-310-008 $7.46CONDO 093-310-009 $7.46CONDO 093-310-010 $7.46CONDO 093-310-011 $7.46CONDO 093-310-012 $7.46CONDO 093-310-013 $7.46CONDO 093-310-014 $7.46CONDO 093-310-015 $7.46CONDO 093-310-016 $7.46CONDO 093-310-017 $7.46CONDO 093-310-018 $7.46CONDO 093-310-019 $7.46CONDO 093-310-020 $7.46CONDO 093-310-021 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 093-310-022 $7.46CONDO 093-310-023 $7.46CONDO 093-310-024 $7.46CONDO 093-310-025 $7.46CONDO 093-310-026 $7.46CONDO 093-310-027 $7.46CONDO 093-310-028 $7.46CONDO 093-310-029 $7.46CONDO 093-310-030 $7.46CONDO 093-310-031 $7.46CONDO 093-310-032 $7.46CONDO 093-310-033 $7.46CONDO 093-310-034 $7.46CONDO 093-310-035 $7.46CONDO 093-310-036 $7.46CONDO 093-310-037 $7.46CONDO 093-310-038 $7.46CONDO 093-310-039 $7.46CONDO 093-310-040 $7.46CONDO 093-310-041 $7.46CONDO 093-310-042 $7.46CONDO 093-310-043 $7.46CONDO 093-310-044 $7.46CONDO 093-310-045 $7.46CONDO 093-310-046 $7.46CONDO 093-310-047 $7.46CONDO 093-310-048 $7.46CONDO 093-310-049 $7.46CONDO 094-015-007 $14.94SFR 095-010-017 $74.70COM 095-021-001 $14.94SFR 095-021-002 $7.46VSFR 095-021-009 $74.70COM 095-022-001 $14.94SFR 095-022-002 $14.94SFR 095-022-003 $14.94SFR 095-022-004 $14.94SFR 095-022-005 $14.94SFR 095-022-006 $14.94SFR 095-022-007 $14.94SFR 095-022-008 $14.94SFR 095-022-009 $14.94SFR 095-022-010 $14.94SFR 095-022-014 $74.70MFR5 095-022-015 $44.82MFR 095-022-017 $14.94SFR 095-022-018 $14.94SFR 095-022-019 $14.94SFR 095-022-020 $14.94SFR 095-022-021 $14.94SFR 095-022-023 $14.94SFR 095-022-024 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-022-025 $7.46VCOM 095-022-026 $7.46VCOM 095-022-027 $7.46VCOM 095-023-002 $44.82MFR 095-023-003 $14.94SFR 095-023-005 $14.94SFR 095-023-006 $14.94SFR 095-023-007 $29.88MFR2 095-023-008 $14.94SFR 095-023-009 $14.94SFR 095-023-010 $74.70MFR5 095-023-011 $14.94SFR 095-023-012 $14.94SFR 095-023-013 $74.70COM 095-031-005 $74.70COM 095-031-006 $14.94SFR 095-031-007 $14.94SFR 095-031-008 $74.70MFR5 095-031-011 $7.46VCOM 095-031-012 $74.70MFR5 095-031-013 $74.70COM 095-032-001 $14.94SFR 095-032-002 $14.94SFR 095-032-003 $14.94SFR 095-032-004 $14.94SFR 095-032-005 $14.94SFR 095-032-006 $14.94SFR 095-032-007 $14.94SFR 095-032-008 $7.46VSFR 095-033-001 $44.82MFR 095-033-002 $14.94SFR 095-033-003 $74.70INST 095-033-004 $74.70INST 095-033-005 $14.94SFR 095-033-006 $14.94SFR 095-033-007 $14.94SFR 095-033-008 $14.94SFR 095-034-002 $7.46VSFR 095-034-003 $14.94SFR 095-034-004 $14.94SFR 095-034-005 $14.94SFR 095-034-006 $14.94SFR 095-034-007 $14.94SFR 095-034-008 $14.94SFR 095-034-009 $14.94SFR 095-034-010 $14.94SFR 095-034-011 $14.94SFR 095-034-013 $74.70COM 095-041-001 $14.94SFR 095-041-002 $14.94SFR 095-041-003 $14.94SFR 095-041-004 $14.94SFR - 46 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-041-005 $14.94SFR 095-041-006 $29.88MFR2 095-041-007 $14.94SFR 095-041-008 $14.94SFR 095-041-009 $14.94SFR 095-041-010 $14.94SFR 095-041-011 $7.46VSFR 095-041-012 $14.94SFR 095-041-013 $14.94SFR 095-041-014 $14.94SFR 095-041-015 $14.94SFR 095-041-016 $14.94SFR 095-041-017 $14.94SFR 095-041-018 $14.94SFR 095-041-019 $14.94SFR 095-041-020 $14.94SFR 095-041-021 $14.94SFR 095-041-022 $14.94SFR 095-041-023 $14.94SFR 095-041-024 $14.94SFR 095-041-025 $14.94SFR 095-041-026 $14.94SFR 095-041-027 $14.94SFR 095-041-028 $14.94SFR 095-041-029 $14.94SFR 095-042-001 $14.94SFR 095-042-002 $14.94SFR 095-042-003 $14.94SFR 095-042-004 $14.94SFR 095-042-005 $14.94SFR 095-042-006 $14.94SFR 095-042-007 $14.94SFR 095-042-008 $14.94SFR 095-042-009 $14.94SFR 095-042-010 $14.94SFR 095-042-011 $14.94SFR 095-042-012 $14.94SFR 095-042-013 $14.94SFR 095-042-014 $14.94SFR 095-042-015 $14.94SFR 095-042-016 $14.94SFR 095-042-017 $14.94SFR 095-042-018 $14.94SFR 095-042-019 $14.94SFR 095-042-020 $14.94SFR 095-042-021 $14.94SFR 095-042-022 $14.94SFR 095-042-023 $14.94SFR 095-042-024 $14.94SFR 095-042-025 $14.94SFR 095-042-026 $14.94SFR 095-042-027 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-042-028 $14.94SFR 095-042-029 $14.94SFR 095-042-030 $14.94SFR 095-042-031 $14.94SFR 095-042-032 $14.94SFR 095-043-001 $14.94SFR 095-043-002 $14.94SFR 095-043-003 $14.94SFR 095-043-004 $14.94SFR 095-043-005 $14.94SFR 095-043-006 $14.94SFR 095-043-007 $14.94SFR 095-043-008 $14.94SFR 095-044-001 $14.94SFR 095-044-002 $14.94SFR 095-044-003 $14.94SFR 095-044-004 $14.94SFR 095-044-005 $14.94SFR 095-044-006 $14.94SFR 095-044-007 $14.94SFR 095-044-008 $14.94SFR 095-044-009 $14.94SFR 095-044-010 $14.94SFR 095-044-011 $14.94SFR 095-044-012 $14.94SFR 095-044-013 $14.94SFR 095-044-014 $14.94SFR 095-044-015 $7.46VSFR 095-044-016 $14.94SFR 095-044-017 $14.94SFR 095-044-018 $14.94SFR 095-044-019 $14.94SFR 095-044-020 $14.94SFR 095-044-021 $14.94SFR 095-044-022 $14.94SFR 095-044-023 $14.94SFR 095-044-024 $14.94SFR 095-044-025 $14.94SFR 095-044-026 $14.94SFR 095-044-027 $14.94SFR 095-044-028 $14.94SFR 095-044-029 $14.94SFR 095-044-030 $14.94SFR 095-044-031 $14.94SFR 095-044-032 $14.94SFR 095-045-001 $14.94SFR 095-045-002 $14.94SFR 095-045-003 $14.94SFR 095-045-004 $14.94SFR 095-045-005 $14.94SFR 095-045-006 $14.94SFR 095-045-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-045-008 $14.94SFR 095-045-009 $14.94SFR 095-045-010 $14.94SFR 095-045-011 $14.94SFR 095-045-012 $14.94SFR 095-045-013 $14.94SFR 095-045-014 $14.94SFR 095-045-015 $14.94SFR 095-045-016 $14.94SFR 095-045-017 $14.94SFR 095-045-018 $14.94SFR 095-045-019 $14.94SFR 095-045-020 $14.94SFR 095-045-021 $14.94SFR 095-050-001 $14.94SFR 095-050-002 $14.94SFR 095-050-003 $14.94SFR 095-050-004 $14.94SFR 095-050-005 $14.94SFR 095-050-006 $14.94SFR 095-050-007 $14.94SFR 095-050-008 $14.94SFR 095-050-009 $14.94SFR 095-050-010 $14.94SFR 095-050-011 $14.94SFR 095-050-012 $14.94SFR 095-050-013 $14.94SFR 095-050-014 $14.94SFR 095-050-015 $14.94SFR 095-050-016 $14.94SFR 095-050-017 $14.94SFR 095-050-018 $14.94SFR 095-050-019 $14.94SFR 095-050-020 $14.94SFR 095-050-021 $14.94SFR 095-050-022 $14.94SFR 095-050-023 $14.94SFR 095-050-024 $14.94SFR 095-050-025 $14.94SFR 095-050-026 $14.94SFR 095-050-027 $14.94SFR 095-050-030 $14.94SFR 095-050-033 $14.94SFR 095-050-041 $14.94SFR 095-050-042 $14.94SFR 095-050-043 $14.94SFR 095-050-044 $14.94SFR 095-050-045 $14.94SFR 095-050-046 $14.94SFR 095-050-047 $14.94SFR 095-050-048 $14.94SFR 095-050-049 $14.94SFR - 47 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-050-050 $14.94SFR 095-050-051 $14.94SFR 095-050-052 $14.94SFR 095-050-053 $14.94SFR 095-050-054 $14.94SFR 095-050-055 $14.94SFR 095-050-056 $14.94SFR 095-050-057 $14.94SFR 095-050-059 $14.94SFR 095-050-060 $14.94SFR 095-050-061 $14.94SFR 095-050-062 $14.94SFR 095-050-063 $14.94SFR 095-050-064 $14.94SFR 095-050-067 $14.94SFR 095-060-006 $14.94SFR 095-060-007 $14.94SFR 095-060-008 $14.94SFR 095-060-014 $14.94SFR 095-060-015 $14.94SFR 095-060-016 $7.46VSFR 095-060-017 $14.94SFR 095-060-018 $14.94SFR 095-060-019 $14.94SFR 095-060-020 $14.94SFR 095-060-021 $14.94SFR 095-060-022 $14.94SFR 095-060-023 $14.94SFR 095-060-024 $14.94SFR 095-060-026 $14.94SFR 095-060-027 $14.94SFR 095-060-028 $14.94SFR 095-060-029 $14.94SFR 095-060-030 $14.94SFR 095-060-031 $14.94SFR 095-060-032 $14.94SFR 095-060-033 $14.94SFR 095-060-034 $14.94SFR 095-071-001 $14.94SFR 095-071-002 $14.94SFR 095-071-003 $14.94SFR 095-071-004 $14.94SFR 095-071-005 $14.94SFR 095-071-006 $14.94SFR 095-071-007 $14.94SFR 095-071-008 $74.70COM 095-071-010 $7.46VSFR 095-072-001 $14.94SFR 095-072-002 $14.94SFR 095-072-003 $14.94SFR 095-072-004 $29.88MFR2 095-072-005 $29.88MFR2 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-072-006 $14.94SFR 095-072-007 $14.94SFR 095-072-008 $14.94SFR 095-072-011 $14.94SFR 095-073-004 $14.94SFR 095-073-005 $14.94SFR 095-073-006 $29.88MFR2 095-073-007 $29.88MFR2 095-073-008 $14.94SFR 095-073-009 $14.94SFR 095-073-010 $14.94SFR 095-074-001 $14.94SFR 095-074-002 $14.94SFR 095-074-003 $44.82MFR 095-074-004 $29.88MFR2 095-074-005 $14.94SFR 095-074-008 $59.76MFR4 095-074-009 $14.94SFR 095-075-003 $14.94SFR 095-075-005 $74.70COM 095-075-006 $14.94SFR 095-075-007 $14.94SFR 095-075-008 $14.94SFR 095-075-017 $14.94SFR 095-075-018 $7.46VMFR 095-075-020 $14.94SFR 095-075-021 $14.94SFR 095-075-022 $14.94SFR 095-075-023 $14.94SFR 095-075-024 $14.94SFR 095-075-025 $7.46VMFR 095-081-001 $14.94SFR 095-081-002 $14.94SFR 095-081-003 $14.94SFR 095-081-004 $14.94SFR 095-081-005 $14.94SFR 095-081-012 $74.70INST 095-081-013 $14.94SFR 095-081-014 $14.94SFR 095-081-015 $14.94SFR 095-081-016 $14.94SFR 095-081-017 $14.94SFR 095-081-020 $14.94SFR 095-081-022 $74.70COM 095-081-023 $14.94SFR 095-082-001 $14.94SFR 095-082-002 $14.94SFR 095-082-003 $14.94SFR 095-082-004 $14.94SFR 095-082-005 $14.94SFR 095-083-006 $14.94SFR 095-083-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-083-009 $14.94SFR 095-083-013 $14.94SFR 095-083-014 $14.94SFR 095-083-015 $14.94SFR 095-083-019 $29.88MFR2 095-083-020 $14.94SFR 095-083-021 $14.94SFR 095-083-022 $14.94SFR 095-083-023 $7.46VCOM 095-084-001 $14.94SFR 095-084-002 $14.94SFR 095-084-004 $14.94SFR 095-084-006 $14.94SFR 095-084-012 $14.94SFR 095-084-014 $14.94SFR 095-084-015 $14.94SFR 095-084-018 $74.70INST 095-084-019 $14.94SFR 095-084-020 $14.94SFR 095-084-021 $14.94SFR 095-084-022 $14.94SFR 095-084-024 $14.94SFR 095-084-025 $7.46VSFR 095-091-003 $44.82MFR 095-091-004 $14.94SFR 095-091-005 $14.94SFR 095-091-006 $14.94SFR 095-091-007 $14.94SFR 095-091-008 $14.94SFR 095-091-009 $14.94SFR 095-091-010 $14.94SFR 095-091-011 $14.94SFR 095-091-012 $14.94SFR 095-091-013 $74.70COM 095-091-014 $74.70COM 095-092-002 $74.70MFR5 095-092-004 $14.94SFR 095-092-006 $74.70MFR5 095-092-007 $7.46VMFR 095-092-008 $14.94SFR 095-092-009 $14.94SFR 095-092-010 $7.46VMFR 095-092-011 $14.94SFR 095-092-012 $59.76MFR4 095-092-013 $14.94SFR 095-092-014 $14.94SFR 095-092-015 $14.94SFR 095-092-016 $14.94SFR 095-092-017 $14.94SFR 095-092-021 $14.94SFR 095-092-022 $59.76MFR4 095-092-023 $14.94SFR - 48 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-092-024 $14.94SFR 095-092-025 $14.94SFR 095-092-027 $59.76MFR4 095-092-028 $59.76MFR4 095-092-029 $14.94SFR 095-092-030 $74.70COM 095-092-031 $74.70COM 095-092-032 $14.94SFR 095-092-033 $7.46VSFR 095-092-034 $7.46VSFR 095-093-002 $14.94SFR 095-093-006 $14.94SFR 095-093-007 $14.94SFR 095-093-008 $14.94SFR 095-093-011 $14.94SFR 095-093-012 $14.94SFR 095-093-013 $14.94SFR 095-093-014 $14.94SFR 095-093-015 $74.70MFR5 095-093-016 $74.70MFR5 095-093-017 $14.94SFR 095-093-018 $44.82MFR 095-093-019 $14.94SFR 095-093-020 $14.94SFR 095-093-023 $14.94SFR 095-093-025 $74.70COM 095-093-026 $14.94SFR 095-093-027 $74.70COM 095-094-001 $14.94SFR 095-094-002 $14.94SFR 095-094-003 $14.94SFR 095-094-004 $14.94SFR 095-094-005 $14.94SFR 095-094-006 $14.94SFR 095-094-007 $14.94SFR 095-094-008 $14.94SFR 095-101-001 $7.46VSFR 095-101-002 $7.46VSFR 095-101-003 $59.76MFR4 095-101-004 $14.94SFR 095-101-005 $44.82MFR 095-101-006 $14.94SFR 095-101-007 $14.94SFR 095-102-001 $44.82MFR 095-102-002 $14.94SFR 095-102-003 $7.46VMFR 095-102-004 $14.94SFR 095-102-005 $14.94SFR 095-102-006 $14.94SFR 095-102-008 $14.94SFR 095-102-009 $14.94SFR 095-102-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-102-011 $14.94SFR 095-102-012 $14.94SFR 095-102-015 $44.82MFR 095-102-017 $14.94SFR 095-102-018 $14.94SFR 095-102-019 $44.82MFR 095-102-020 $7.46VSFR 095-102-021 $14.94SFR 095-102-022 $14.94SFR 095-102-023 $14.94SFR 095-103-001 $14.94SFR 095-103-003 $14.94SFR 095-103-004 $14.94SFR 095-103-007 $74.70INST 095-103-008 $14.94SFR 095-103-009 $14.94SFR 095-103-010 $14.94SFR 095-103-011 $14.94SFR 095-103-012 $14.94SFR 095-103-013 $14.94SFR 095-103-014 $14.94SFR 095-103-015 $14.94SFR 095-103-016 $44.82MFR 095-104-002 $14.94SFR 095-104-003 $14.94SFR 095-104-004 $14.94SFR 095-104-005 $14.94SFR 095-104-006 $14.94SFR 095-104-007 $14.94SFR 095-104-008 $14.94SFR 095-104-009 $14.94SFR 095-105-002 $14.94SFR 095-105-005 $14.94SFR 095-105-006 $14.94SFR 095-105-007 $14.94SFR 095-107-005 $14.94SFR 095-107-007 $44.82MFR 095-107-008 $14.94SFR 095-107-009 $14.94SFR 095-107-010 $14.94SFR 095-107-011 $14.94SFR 095-107-012 $14.94SFR 095-107-013 $14.94SFR 095-107-014 $14.94SFR 095-107-015 $7.46VSFR 095-107-016 $74.70COM 095-107-017 $74.70COM 095-110-003 $74.70COM 095-120-002 $14.94SFR 095-120-003 $14.94SFR 095-120-004 $14.94SFR 095-120-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-120-006 $14.94SFR 095-120-007 $14.94SFR 095-120-008 $14.94SFR 095-120-009 $14.94SFR 095-120-012 $14.94SFR 095-120-014 $14.94SFR 095-120-015 $14.94SFR 095-120-016 $14.94SFR 095-120-018 $14.94SFR 095-120-019 $14.94SFR 095-120-020 $14.94SFR 095-120-021 $14.94SFR 095-120-022 $14.94SFR 095-120-023 $14.94SFR 095-120-024 $14.94SFR 095-120-025 $14.94SFR 095-120-026 $14.94SFR 095-120-027 $14.94SFR 095-120-028 $14.94SFR 095-120-029 $14.94SFR 095-120-030 $14.94SFR 095-120-031 $14.94SFR 095-120-033 $14.94SFR 095-120-034 $14.94SFR 095-120-036 $14.94SFR 095-120-037 $14.94SFR 095-120-038 $14.94SFR 095-120-039 $14.94SFR 095-120-040 $14.94SFR 095-120-041 $7.46VSFR 095-301-001 $14.94SFR 095-301-002 $14.94SFR 095-301-003 $14.94SFR 095-301-004 $14.94SFR 095-301-005 $14.94SFR 095-301-006 $14.94SFR 095-301-007 $14.94SFR 095-301-008 $14.94SFR 095-301-009 $14.94SFR 095-301-010 $14.94SFR 095-301-011 $14.94SFR 095-301-012 $14.94SFR 095-301-013 $14.94SFR 095-301-014 $14.94SFR 095-301-015 $14.94SFR 095-301-016 $14.94SFR 095-301-017 $14.94SFR 095-302-001 $14.94SFR 095-302-002 $14.94SFR 095-302-003 $14.94SFR 095-302-004 $14.94SFR 095-302-005 $14.94SFR - 49 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-302-006 $14.94SFR 095-302-007 $14.94SFR 095-302-008 $14.94SFR 095-302-009 $14.94SFR 095-302-010 $14.94SFR 095-302-011 $14.94SFR 095-302-012 $14.94SFR 095-302-013 $14.94SFR 095-302-014 $14.94SFR 095-302-015 $14.94SFR 095-302-016 $14.94SFR 095-302-017 $14.94SFR 095-302-018 $14.94SFR 095-302-019 $14.94SFR 095-302-020 $14.94SFR 095-302-021 $14.94SFR 095-302-022 $14.94SFR 095-302-023 $14.94SFR 095-302-024 $14.94SFR 095-302-025 $14.94SFR 095-302-026 $14.94SFR 095-302-027 $14.94SFR 095-311-001 $14.94SFR 095-311-002 $14.94SFR 095-311-003 $14.94SFR 095-311-004 $14.94SFR 095-311-005 $14.94SFR 095-311-006 $14.94SFR 095-311-007 $14.94SFR 095-311-008 $14.94SFR 095-311-009 $14.94SFR 095-311-010 $14.94SFR 095-311-011 $14.94SFR 095-311-012 $14.94SFR 095-311-013 $14.94SFR 095-311-014 $14.94SFR 095-311-015 $14.94SFR 095-311-016 $14.94SFR 095-311-017 $14.94SFR 095-311-018 $14.94SFR 095-311-019 $14.94SFR 095-311-020 $14.94SFR 095-311-021 $14.94SFR 095-311-022 $14.94SFR 095-311-023 $14.94SFR 095-311-024 $14.94SFR 095-311-025 $14.94SFR 095-311-026 $14.94SFR 095-312-001 $14.94SFR 095-312-002 $14.94SFR 095-312-003 $14.94SFR 095-312-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-312-005 $14.94SFR 095-312-006 $14.94SFR 095-312-007 $14.94SFR 095-312-008 $14.94SFR 095-312-009 $14.94SFR 095-312-010 $14.94SFR 095-312-011 $14.94SFR 095-312-012 $14.94SFR 095-312-013 $14.94SFR 095-312-014 $14.94SFR 095-312-015 $14.94SFR 095-312-016 $14.94SFR 095-312-017 $14.94SFR 095-312-018 $14.94SFR 095-312-019 $14.94SFR 095-312-020 $14.94SFR 095-312-021 $14.94SFR 095-312-022 $14.94SFR 095-312-023 $14.94SFR 095-312-024 $14.94SFR 095-321-001 $14.94SFR 095-321-002 $14.94SFR 095-321-003 $14.94SFR 095-321-004 $14.94SFR 095-321-005 $14.94SFR 095-321-006 $14.94SFR 095-321-007 $14.94SFR 095-321-008 $14.94SFR 095-321-009 $14.94SFR 095-321-010 $14.94SFR 095-321-011 $14.94SFR 095-321-012 $14.94SFR 095-321-013 $14.94SFR 095-321-014 $14.94SFR 095-321-015 $14.94SFR 095-321-016 $14.94SFR 095-321-017 $14.94SFR 095-321-018 $14.94SFR 095-321-019 $14.94SFR 095-321-020 $14.94SFR 095-321-021 $14.94SFR 095-321-025 $14.94SFR 095-321-032 $14.94SFR 095-321-033 $14.94SFR 095-321-034 $14.94SFR 095-321-035 $14.94SFR 095-321-036 $14.94SFR 095-321-037 $14.94SFR 095-321-038 $14.94SFR 095-321-040 $14.94SFR 095-322-001 $14.94SFR 095-322-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-322-003 $14.94SFR 095-322-004 $14.94SFR 095-322-005 $14.94SFR 095-322-006 $14.94SFR 095-322-007 $14.94SFR 095-322-008 $14.94SFR 095-322-009 $14.94SFR 095-322-010 $14.94SFR 095-322-011 $14.94SFR 095-322-012 $14.94SFR 095-322-013 $14.94SFR 095-322-014 $14.94SFR 095-322-015 $14.94SFR 095-322-016 $14.94SFR 095-322-017 $14.94SFR 095-322-018 $14.94SFR 095-322-019 $14.94SFR 095-322-020 $14.94SFR 095-322-021 $14.94SFR 095-322-022 $14.94SFR 095-322-023 $14.94SFR 095-322-024 $14.94SFR 095-322-025 $14.94SFR 095-322-026 $14.94SFR 095-331-001 $14.94SFR 095-331-002 $14.94SFR 095-331-003 $14.94SFR 095-331-004 $14.94SFR 095-331-005 $14.94SFR 095-331-006 $14.94SFR 095-331-007 $14.94SFR 095-331-008 $14.94SFR 095-331-009 $14.94SFR 095-331-010 $14.94SFR 095-331-011 $14.94SFR 095-331-012 $14.94SFR 095-331-013 $14.94SFR 095-331-014 $14.94SFR 095-331-015 $14.94SFR 095-331-016 $14.94SFR 095-331-017 $14.94SFR 095-331-018 $14.94SFR 095-331-019 $14.94SFR 095-331-020 $14.94SFR 095-331-021 $14.94SFR 095-331-022 $14.94SFR 095-331-023 $14.94SFR 095-331-024 $14.94SFR 095-331-025 $14.94SFR 095-331-026 $14.94SFR 095-332-001 $14.94SFR 095-332-002 $14.94SFR - 50 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-332-003 $14.94SFR 095-332-004 $14.94SFR 095-332-005 $14.94SFR 095-332-006 $14.94SFR 095-332-007 $14.94SFR 095-332-008 $14.94SFR 095-332-009 $14.94SFR 095-332-020 $14.94SFR 095-332-021 $14.94SFR 095-332-022 $14.94SFR 095-332-023 $14.94SFR 095-332-024 $14.94SFR 095-332-025 $14.94SFR 095-332-026 $14.94SFR 095-332-027 $14.94SFR 095-332-029 $14.94SFR 095-420-001 $7.46CONDO 095-420-002 $7.46CONDO 095-420-003 $7.46CONDO 095-420-004 $7.46CONDO 095-420-005 $7.46CONDO 095-420-006 $7.46CONDO 095-420-007 $7.46CONDO 095-420-008 $7.46CONDO 095-420-009 $7.46CONDO 095-420-010 $7.46CONDO 095-420-011 $7.46CONDO 095-420-012 $7.46CONDO 095-420-013 $7.46CONDO 095-420-014 $7.46CONDO 095-420-015 $7.46CONDO 095-420-016 $7.46CONDO 095-420-017 $7.46CONDO 095-420-018 $7.46CONDO 095-420-019 $7.46CONDO 095-420-020 $7.46CONDO 095-420-021 $7.46CONDO 095-420-022 $7.46CONDO 095-420-023 $7.46CONDO 095-420-024 $7.46CONDO 095-420-025 $7.46CONDO 095-420-026 $7.46CONDO 095-420-027 $7.46CONDO 095-420-028 $7.46CONDO 095-420-029 $7.46CONDO 095-420-030 $7.46CONDO 095-420-031 $7.46CONDO 095-420-032 $7.46CONDO 095-420-033 $7.46CONDO 095-420-034 $7.46CONDO 095-420-037 $74.70COM 095-470-001 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 095-470-002 $7.46CONDO 095-470-003 $7.46CONDO 095-470-004 $7.46CONDO 095-470-005 $7.46CONDO 095-470-006 $7.46CONDO 095-470-007 $7.46CONDO 095-470-008 $7.46CONDO 095-470-009 $7.46CONDO 095-470-010 $7.46CONDO 096-011-001 $14.94SFR 096-011-002 $14.94SFR 096-012-002 $29.88MFR2 096-012-003 $14.94SFR 096-012-005 $14.94SFR 096-012-006 $14.94SFR 096-012-008 $7.46VSFR 096-013-002 $14.94SFR 096-013-004 $14.94SFR 096-013-006 $74.70COM 096-013-007 $14.94SFR 096-013-008 $14.94SFR 096-013-009 $14.94SFR 096-014-002 $14.94SFR 096-014-003 $14.94SFR 096-014-004 $14.94SFR 096-014-005 $14.94SFR 096-014-006 $14.94SFR 096-014-007 $14.94SFR 096-014-008 $14.94SFR 096-014-011 $14.94SFR 096-015-002 $14.94SFR 096-015-004 $29.88MFR2 096-015-005 $29.88MFR2 096-015-006 $44.82MFR 096-015-011 $7.46VSFR 096-015-013 $14.94SFR 096-015-014 $14.94SFR 096-015-015 $7.46VSFR 096-015-016 $7.46VSFR 096-015-017 $14.94SFR 096-015-018 $14.94SFR 096-015-024 $14.94SFR 096-015-025 $14.94SFR 096-015-026 $14.94SFR 096-016-001 $7.46VSFR 096-016-002 $7.46VMFR 096-016-003 $7.46VMFR 096-016-004 $14.94SFR 096-016-005 $7.46VSFR 096-016-006 $59.76MFR4 096-016-012 $14.94SFR 096-016-013 $7.46VMFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 096-016-014 $14.94SFR 096-016-017 $14.94SFR 096-016-018 $7.46VMFR 096-016-019 $29.88MFR2 096-016-020 $74.70COM 096-016-023 $74.70INST 096-016-024 $29.88MFR2 096-017-001 $14.94SFR 096-017-003 $14.94SFR 096-017-004 $14.94SFR 096-017-005 $14.94SFR 096-017-006 $14.94SFR 096-017-008 $7.46VMFR 096-017-009 $14.94SFR 096-018-001 $14.94SFR 096-018-002 $14.94SFR 096-018-003 $14.94SFR 096-018-004 $14.94SFR 096-018-005 $14.94SFR 096-018-006 $14.94SFR 096-018-007 $7.46VMFR 096-018-008 $14.94SFR 096-018-009 $14.94SFR 096-018-010 $14.94SFR 096-018-011 $7.46VMFR 096-018-012 $14.94SFR 096-018-013 $14.94SFR 096-018-014 $14.94SFR 096-018-015 $7.46VSFR 096-019-006 $7.46VSFR 096-019-009 $7.46VSFR 096-019-013 $14.94SFR 096-019-014 $14.94SFR 096-019-015 $29.88MFR2 096-019-016 $14.94SFR 096-019-017 $7.46VMFR 096-019-019 $14.94SFR 096-019-021 $44.82MFR 096-019-022 $14.94SFR 096-019-023 $14.94SFR 096-019-024 $14.94SFR 096-019-025 $7.46VCOM 096-019-026 $74.70COM 096-019-027 $74.70COM 096-019-028 $74.70COM 096-019-029 $74.70COM 096-020-004 $14.94SFR 096-020-005 $14.94SFR 096-020-006 $14.94SFR 096-020-007 $14.94SFR 096-020-008 $14.94SFR 096-020-009 $14.94SFR - 51 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 096-020-021 $29.88MFR2 096-020-022 $7.46VMFR 096-020-025 $14.94SFR 096-020-026 $44.82MFR 096-020-027 $14.94SFR 096-020-029 $14.94SFR 096-020-030 $14.94SFR 096-020-031 $14.94SFR 096-020-032 $14.94SFR 096-020-033 $14.94SFR 096-020-034 $14.94SFR 096-020-035 $14.94SFR 096-020-036 $14.94SFR 096-020-039 $7.46VSFR 096-020-042 $7.46VSFR 096-020-047 $14.94SFR 096-020-050 $7.46VSFR 096-020-057 $14.94SFR 096-020-059 $14.94SFR 096-020-060 $7.46VSFR 096-020-062 $7.46VMFR 096-020-064 $14.94SFR 096-020-067 $14.94SFR 096-020-069 $14.94SFR 096-020-071 $14.94SFR 096-020-073 $29.88MFR2 096-020-075 $14.94SFR 096-020-081 $7.46VMFR 096-020-082 $7.46VCOM 096-020-083 $74.70COM 096-020-089 $14.94SFR 096-020-090 $14.94SFR 096-020-092 $14.94SFR 096-020-093 $7.46VMFR 096-020-094 $14.94SFR 096-020-095 $14.94SFR 096-020-101 $14.94SFR 096-020-102 $14.94SFR 096-020-103 $14.94SFR 096-020-104 $14.94SFR 096-020-105 $14.94SFR 096-020-106 $14.94SFR 096-020-107 $14.94SFR 096-020-108 $14.94SFR 096-020-109 $14.94SFR 096-020-110 $14.94SFR 096-020-111 $14.94SFR 096-020-112 $14.94SFR 096-020-113 $14.94SFR 096-020-114 $14.94SFR 096-020-115 $14.94SFR 096-020-116 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 096-020-117 $14.94SFR 096-020-118 $14.94SFR 096-020-119 $14.94SFR 096-020-120 $14.94SFR 096-020-121 $14.94SFR 096-020-122 $14.94SFR 096-020-123 $14.94SFR 096-020-124 $14.94SFR 096-020-125 $14.94SFR 096-020-126 $14.94SFR 096-020-127 $14.94SFR 096-020-128 $14.94SFR 096-020-129 $14.94SFR 096-020-130 $14.94SFR 096-020-131 $14.94SFR 096-020-132 $14.94SFR 096-020-133 $14.94SFR 096-020-134 $14.94SFR 096-020-135 $14.94SFR 096-020-136 $14.94SFR 096-020-137 $14.94SFR 096-020-138 $14.94SFR 096-020-139 $14.94SFR 096-020-140 $14.94SFR 096-020-141 $14.94SFR 096-020-142 $14.94SFR 096-020-143 $14.94SFR 096-020-144 $14.94SFR 096-020-145 $14.94SFR 096-020-146 $14.94SFR 096-020-147 $14.94SFR 096-020-148 $14.94SFR 096-020-149 $14.94SFR 096-020-150 $14.94SFR 096-020-151 $14.94SFR 096-020-152 $14.94SFR 096-020-153 $14.94SFR 096-020-154 $14.94SFR 096-020-155 $14.94SFR 096-020-156 $14.94SFR 096-020-157 $14.94SFR 096-020-158 $14.94SFR 096-020-159 $14.94SFR 096-020-160 $14.94SFR 096-020-161 $14.94SFR 096-020-162 $14.94SFR 096-020-163 $14.94SFR 096-020-164 $14.94SFR 096-020-165 $14.94SFR 096-020-166 $14.94SFR 096-020-167 $14.94SFR 096-020-168 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 096-020-169 $14.94SFR 096-020-172 $14.94SFR 096-020-173 $7.46VMFR 096-020-175 $104.58MFR7 096-020-176 $14.94SFR 096-020-177 $14.94SFR 096-020-178 $29.88MFR2 096-020-181 $74.70COM 096-020-184 $14.94SFR 096-031-004 $14.94SFR 096-031-006 $104.58MFR7 096-031-007 $14.94SFR 096-031-008 $14.94SFR 096-031-014 $89.64MFR6 096-031-015 $59.76MFR4 096-031-016 $74.70COM 096-031-018 $7.46VMFR 096-031-019 $7.46VMFR 096-031-022 $74.70COM 096-032-003 $14.94SFR 096-032-004 $14.94SFR 096-032-008 $14.94SFR 096-032-009 $14.94SFR 096-032-010 $29.88MFR2 096-032-011 $7.46VMFR 096-032-016 $7.46VMFR 096-032-017 $7.46VSFR 096-032-018 $74.70MFR5 096-032-019 $44.82MFR 096-032-020 $44.82MFR 096-032-022 $44.82MFR 096-032-023 $29.88MFR2 096-032-024 $29.88MFR2 096-032-025 $14.94SFR 096-032-027 $14.94SFR 096-032-028 $7.46VCOM 096-032-029 $74.70COM 096-032-030 $74.70MFR5 096-032-031 $89.64MFR6 096-032-032 $7.46VCOM 096-033-001 $14.94SFR 096-033-002 $14.94SFR 096-033-003 $14.94SFR 096-033-004 $14.94SFR 096-033-005 $14.94SFR 096-033-006 $14.94SFR 096-033-008 $74.70MFR5 096-033-009 $14.94SFR 096-033-010 $14.94SFR 096-033-011 $14.94SFR 096-033-012 $14.94SFR 096-033-013 $14.94SFR - 52 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 096-033-019 $14.94SFR 096-033-020 $14.94SFR 096-033-021 $14.94SFR 096-033-024 $14.94SFR 096-033-027 $14.94SFR 096-033-028 $7.46VMFR 096-033-032 $14.94SFR 096-033-033 $14.94SFR 096-033-034 $14.94SFR 096-033-035 $7.46VMFR 096-033-036 $74.70INST 096-033-037 $7.46VSFR 096-033-039 $74.70COM 096-033-040 $14.94SFR 096-033-041 $44.82MFR 096-041-003 $14.94SFR 096-041-004 $14.94SFR 096-041-006 $59.76MFR4 096-041-007 $14.94SFR 096-041-020 $14.94SFR 096-041-021 $74.70COM 096-041-022 $14.94SFR 096-041-023 $14.94SFR 096-041-024 $14.94SFR 096-041-025 $14.94SFR 096-042-005 $14.94SFR 096-042-006 $14.94SFR 096-042-007 $74.70COM 096-042-010 $44.82MFR 096-042-011 $74.70MFR5 096-042-015 $14.94SFR 096-042-016 $59.76MFR4 096-042-019 $44.82MFR 096-042-020 $7.46VMFR 096-042-021 $14.94SFR 096-042-022 $14.94SFR 096-042-023 $14.94SFR 096-042-024 $29.88MFR2 096-042-025 $74.70COM 096-043-001 $14.94SFR 096-043-002 $29.88MFR2 096-043-007 $14.94SFR 096-043-008 $14.94SFR 096-043-010 $14.94SFR 096-043-014 $14.94SFR 096-043-017 $14.94SFR 096-043-019 $74.70INST 096-043-020 $7.46VMFR 096-043-021 $7.46VSFR 096-043-022 $14.94SFR 096-043-023 $14.94SFR 096-043-024 $74.70INST Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 096-043-025 $14.94SFR 096-043-026 $29.88MFR2 096-043-027 $29.88MFR2 096-043-029 $14.94SFR 096-043-030 $14.94SFR 096-043-031 $14.94SFR 096-043-032 $14.94SFR 096-043-034 $14.94SFR 096-043-035 $14.94SFR 096-044-001 $74.70COM 096-044-002 $7.46VMFR 096-044-003 $7.46VSFR 096-044-004 $14.94SFR 096-044-005 $7.46VSFR 096-044-006 $14.94SFR 096-044-007 $7.46VMFR 096-044-008 $14.94SFR 096-044-009 $14.94SFR 096-044-010 $74.70COM 096-050-001 $74.70MFR5 096-050-003 $14.94SFR 096-050-004 $7.46VMFR 096-050-006 $14.94SFR 096-050-007 $74.70COM 096-050-010 $14.94SFR 096-050-011 $7.46VSFR 096-050-012 $7.46VSFR 096-050-013 $7.46VSFR 096-050-014 $7.46VSFR 096-050-015 $74.70IND 098-030-001 $74.70COM 098-030-010 $14.94SFR 098-030-011 $14.94SFR 098-030-012 $14.94SFR 098-030-013 $14.94SFR 098-030-014 $14.94SFR 098-030-015 $14.94SFR 098-030-016 $14.94SFR 098-030-017 $14.94SFR 098-030-018 $14.94SFR 098-030-019 $14.94SFR 098-030-020 $14.94SFR 098-030-021 $14.94SFR 098-030-022 $14.94SFR 098-030-023 $14.94SFR 098-030-024 $14.94SFR 098-030-025 $14.94SFR 098-030-026 $14.94SFR 098-030-027 $14.94SFR 098-030-028 $14.94SFR 098-030-029 $14.94SFR 098-030-030 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-030-032 $7.46VCOM 098-030-033 $74.70COM 098-030-035 $74.70COM 098-030-036 $74.70MFR5 098-030-037 $74.70MFR5 098-040-001 $14.94SFR 098-040-002 $14.94SFR 098-040-003 $14.94SFR 098-040-004 $14.94SFR 098-040-005 $14.94SFR 098-040-006 $14.94SFR 098-040-007 $14.94SFR 098-040-008 $14.94SFR 098-040-009 $14.94SFR 098-040-010 $14.94SFR 098-040-011 $14.94SFR 098-040-012 $14.94SFR 098-040-024 $74.70MFR5 098-040-025 $89.64MFR6 098-040-026 $104.58MFR7 098-040-027 $74.70COM 098-040-028 $74.70COM 098-040-029 $74.70MFR5 098-040-030 $7.46VMFR 098-051-001 $14.94SFR 098-051-002 $14.94SFR 098-051-003 $14.94SFR 098-051-004 $14.94SFR 098-051-005 $14.94SFR 098-051-006 $14.94SFR 098-051-007 $14.94SFR 098-051-008 $14.94SFR 098-051-009 $14.94SFR 098-051-010 $14.94SFR 098-051-011 $14.94SFR 098-051-012 $14.94SFR 098-051-013 $14.94SFR 098-051-014 $14.94SFR 098-051-015 $14.94SFR 098-051-016 $14.94SFR 098-051-017 $14.94SFR 098-051-018 $14.94SFR 098-051-019 $14.94SFR 098-051-020 $14.94SFR 098-051-021 $14.94SFR 098-051-022 $14.94SFR 098-051-023 $14.94SFR 098-051-024 $14.94SFR 098-051-025 $14.94SFR 098-052-001 $14.94SFR 098-052-002 $14.94SFR 098-052-003 $14.94SFR - 53 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-052-004 $14.94SFR 098-052-005 $14.94SFR 098-052-006 $7.46VSFR 098-052-007 $14.94SFR 098-052-008 $14.94SFR 098-052-009 $14.94SFR 098-052-010 $14.94SFR 098-052-011 $14.94SFR 098-052-012 $14.94SFR 098-052-013 $14.94SFR 098-052-014 $14.94SFR 098-052-015 $14.94SFR 098-052-016 $14.94SFR 098-052-017 $14.94SFR 098-052-018 $14.94SFR 098-052-019 $14.94SFR 098-052-020 $14.94SFR 098-052-021 $14.94SFR 098-052-022 $14.94SFR 098-052-023 $14.94SFR 098-052-024 $14.94SFR 098-052-025 $14.94SFR 098-052-026 $14.94SFR 098-052-027 $14.94SFR 098-052-028 $14.94SFR 098-052-029 $14.94SFR 098-052-030 $14.94SFR 098-052-031 $14.94SFR 098-052-032 $14.94SFR 098-052-033 $14.94SFR 098-052-034 $14.94SFR 098-052-035 $14.94SFR 098-052-036 $14.94SFR 098-052-037 $14.94SFR 098-052-038 $14.94SFR 098-052-039 $14.94SFR 098-052-040 $14.94SFR 098-052-041 $14.94SFR 098-052-042 $14.94SFR 098-052-043 $14.94SFR 098-052-044 $14.94SFR 098-052-045 $14.94SFR 098-052-046 $14.94SFR 098-052-047 $14.94SFR 098-052-048 $14.94SFR 098-052-049 $14.94SFR 098-052-050 $14.94SFR 098-052-051 $14.94SFR 098-052-052 $7.46VSFR 098-052-053 $7.46VSFR 098-052-054 $14.94SFR 098-052-055 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-061-001 $14.94SFR 098-061-002 $14.94SFR 098-061-003 $14.94SFR 098-061-004 $14.94SFR 098-061-005 $14.94SFR 098-061-006 $14.94SFR 098-061-007 $14.94SFR 098-061-008 $14.94SFR 098-061-009 $14.94SFR 098-061-010 $14.94SFR 098-061-011 $14.94SFR 098-061-012 $14.94SFR 098-061-013 $14.94SFR 098-061-014 $14.94SFR 098-061-015 $14.94SFR 098-061-016 $14.94SFR 098-062-001 $14.94SFR 098-062-002 $14.94SFR 098-062-003 $14.94SFR 098-062-004 $14.94SFR 098-062-005 $14.94SFR 098-062-006 $14.94SFR 098-062-007 $14.94SFR 098-062-008 $14.94SFR 098-062-009 $14.94SFR 098-062-010 $14.94SFR 098-062-011 $14.94SFR 098-062-012 $14.94SFR 098-063-001 $14.94SFR 098-063-002 $14.94SFR 098-063-003 $14.94SFR 098-063-004 $14.94SFR 098-063-005 $14.94SFR 098-063-006 $14.94SFR 098-063-007 $14.94SFR 098-063-008 $14.94SFR 098-063-009 $14.94SFR 098-063-010 $14.94SFR 098-063-011 $14.94SFR 098-063-012 $14.94SFR 098-063-013 $14.94SFR 098-063-014 $14.94SFR 098-063-015 $14.94SFR 098-063-016 $14.94SFR 098-063-017 $14.94SFR 098-063-018 $14.94SFR 098-063-019 $14.94SFR 098-063-020 $14.94SFR 098-063-021 $14.94SFR 098-063-022 $14.94SFR 098-063-023 $14.94SFR 098-063-024 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-063-025 $14.94SFR 098-063-026 $14.94SFR 098-063-027 $14.94SFR 098-063-028 $14.94SFR 098-063-029 $14.94SFR 098-063-030 $14.94SFR 098-064-001 $14.94SFR 098-064-002 $14.94SFR 098-064-003 $14.94SFR 098-064-004 $14.94SFR 098-064-005 $14.94SFR 098-064-006 $14.94SFR 098-064-007 $14.94SFR 098-064-008 $14.94SFR 098-064-009 $14.94SFR 098-064-010 $14.94SFR 098-064-011 $14.94SFR 098-064-012 $14.94SFR 098-064-013 $14.94SFR 098-064-014 $14.94SFR 098-064-015 $14.94SFR 098-064-016 $14.94SFR 098-071-001 $14.94SFR 098-071-002 $14.94SFR 098-071-003 $14.94SFR 098-071-004 $14.94SFR 098-071-005 $14.94SFR 098-071-006 $14.94SFR 098-071-007 $14.94SFR 098-071-008 $14.94SFR 098-071-009 $14.94SFR 098-071-010 $14.94SFR 098-071-011 $14.94SFR 098-071-012 $14.94SFR 098-071-013 $14.94SFR 098-071-014 $14.94SFR 098-071-015 $14.94SFR 098-071-016 $14.94SFR 098-072-001 $7.46VSFR 098-072-002 $14.94SFR 098-072-003 $14.94SFR 098-072-004 $14.94SFR 098-072-005 $14.94SFR 098-072-006 $14.94SFR 098-072-007 $14.94SFR 098-072-008 $14.94SFR 098-072-009 $29.88MFR2 098-072-010 $14.94SFR 098-072-011 $14.94SFR 098-072-012 $14.94SFR 098-072-013 $14.94SFR 098-072-014 $14.94SFR - 54 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-072-015 $14.94SFR 098-072-016 $14.94SFR 098-072-017 $14.94SFR 098-072-018 $14.94SFR 098-072-019 $14.94SFR 098-072-020 $14.94SFR 098-072-021 $14.94SFR 098-072-022 $14.94SFR 098-072-023 $14.94SFR 098-072-024 $14.94SFR 098-072-025 $14.94SFR 098-072-026 $14.94SFR 098-072-027 $14.94SFR 098-072-028 $14.94SFR 098-072-029 $14.94SFR 098-072-030 $14.94SFR 098-072-031 $14.94SFR 098-072-032 $14.94SFR 098-073-001 $14.94SFR 098-073-002 $14.94SFR 098-073-003 $14.94SFR 098-073-004 $14.94SFR 098-073-005 $14.94SFR 098-073-006 $14.94SFR 098-073-007 $14.94SFR 098-073-008 $14.94SFR 098-073-009 $14.94SFR 098-073-010 $14.94SFR 098-073-011 $14.94SFR 098-073-012 $14.94SFR 098-073-013 $14.94SFR 098-073-014 $14.94SFR 098-073-015 $14.94SFR 098-073-016 $14.94SFR 098-073-017 $14.94SFR 098-073-018 $14.94SFR 098-073-019 $14.94SFR 098-073-020 $14.94SFR 098-073-021 $14.94SFR 098-073-022 $14.94SFR 098-073-023 $14.94SFR 098-073-024 $14.94SFR 098-073-025 $14.94SFR 098-073-026 $14.94SFR 098-073-027 $14.94SFR 098-073-028 $14.94SFR 098-073-029 $14.94SFR 098-073-030 $14.94SFR 098-073-031 $14.94SFR 098-073-032 $14.94SFR 098-074-001 $14.94SFR 098-074-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-074-003 $14.94SFR 098-074-004 $14.94SFR 098-074-005 $14.94SFR 098-074-006 $14.94SFR 098-074-007 $14.94SFR 098-074-008 $14.94SFR 098-074-009 $14.94SFR 098-074-010 $14.94SFR 098-074-011 $14.94SFR 098-074-012 $14.94SFR 098-074-013 $14.94SFR 098-074-014 $14.94SFR 098-074-015 $14.94SFR 098-074-016 $14.94SFR 098-074-017 $14.94SFR 098-074-018 $14.94SFR 098-074-019 $14.94SFR 098-074-020 $14.94SFR 098-074-021 $14.94SFR 098-074-022 $14.94SFR 098-074-023 $14.94SFR 098-074-024 $14.94SFR 098-074-025 $14.94SFR 098-074-026 $14.94SFR 098-074-027 $14.94SFR 098-074-028 $14.94SFR 098-074-029 $14.94SFR 098-074-030 $14.94SFR 098-074-031 $14.94SFR 098-074-032 $14.94SFR 098-075-001 $14.94SFR 098-075-002 $14.94SFR 098-075-003 $14.94SFR 098-075-004 $14.94SFR 098-075-005 $14.94SFR 098-075-006 $14.94SFR 098-075-007 $14.94SFR 098-075-010 $14.94SFR 098-075-011 $14.94SFR 098-075-012 $14.94SFR 098-075-013 $14.94SFR 098-075-014 $14.94SFR 098-075-015 $14.94SFR 098-075-016 $14.94SFR 098-075-017 $14.94SFR 098-075-018 $14.94SFR 098-075-019 $14.94SFR 098-075-020 $14.94SFR 098-075-021 $14.94SFR 098-075-022 $14.94SFR 098-075-023 $14.94SFR 098-075-024 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-075-025 $14.94SFR 098-075-026 $14.94SFR 098-075-027 $14.94SFR 098-075-028 $14.94SFR 098-075-029 $14.94SFR 098-075-030 $14.94SFR 098-075-031 $14.94SFR 098-075-032 $14.94SFR 098-075-033 $14.94SFR 098-081-001 $14.94SFR 098-081-002 $14.94SFR 098-081-003 $14.94SFR 098-081-004 $14.94SFR 098-081-005 $14.94SFR 098-081-006 $14.94SFR 098-081-007 $14.94SFR 098-081-008 $14.94SFR 098-081-009 $14.94SFR 098-081-010 $14.94SFR 098-081-011 $14.94SFR 098-081-012 $14.94SFR 098-081-013 $14.94SFR 098-081-014 $14.94SFR 098-081-015 $14.94SFR 098-081-016 $14.94SFR 098-081-017 $14.94SFR 098-081-018 $14.94SFR 098-081-019 $14.94SFR 098-081-020 $14.94SFR 098-081-021 $14.94SFR 098-081-022 $14.94SFR 098-081-023 $14.94SFR 098-081-024 $14.94SFR 098-081-025 $14.94SFR 098-081-026 $14.94SFR 098-081-027 $14.94SFR 098-081-028 $14.94SFR 098-081-029 $14.94SFR 098-081-030 $14.94SFR 098-081-031 $14.94SFR 098-081-032 $14.94SFR 098-082-001 $14.94SFR 098-082-002 $14.94SFR 098-082-003 $14.94SFR 098-082-004 $14.94SFR 098-082-005 $14.94SFR 098-082-006 $14.94SFR 098-082-007 $14.94SFR 098-082-008 $14.94SFR 098-082-009 $14.94SFR 098-082-010 $14.94SFR 098-082-011 $14.94SFR - 55 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-082-012 $14.94SFR 098-082-013 $14.94SFR 098-082-014 $14.94SFR 098-082-015 $14.94SFR 098-082-016 $14.94SFR 098-082-017 $14.94SFR 098-083-001 $14.94SFR 098-083-002 $14.94SFR 098-083-003 $14.94SFR 098-083-004 $14.94SFR 098-083-005 $14.94SFR 098-083-006 $14.94SFR 098-083-007 $14.94SFR 098-083-008 $14.94SFR 098-084-001 $14.94SFR 098-084-002 $14.94SFR 098-084-003 $14.94SFR 098-084-004 $14.94SFR 098-084-005 $14.94SFR 098-084-006 $14.94SFR 098-084-007 $14.94SFR 098-084-008 $14.94SFR 098-084-009 $14.94SFR 098-084-010 $14.94SFR 098-084-011 $14.94SFR 098-084-012 $14.94SFR 098-084-013 $14.94SFR 098-084-014 $14.94SFR 098-091-004 $14.94SFR 098-091-005 $14.94SFR 098-091-006 $14.94SFR 098-091-007 $14.94SFR 098-091-008 $14.94SFR 098-091-009 $14.94SFR 098-091-010 $14.94SFR 098-091-011 $14.94SFR 098-091-012 $14.94SFR 098-091-013 $14.94SFR 098-091-014 $14.94SFR 098-091-015 $14.94SFR 098-091-016 $14.94SFR 098-092-001 $14.94SFR 098-092-002 $14.94SFR 098-092-003 $14.94SFR 098-092-004 $14.94SFR 098-092-005 $14.94SFR 098-092-006 $14.94SFR 098-092-007 $14.94SFR 098-092-008 $14.94SFR 098-092-009 $14.94SFR 098-092-010 $14.94SFR 098-092-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-092-012 $14.94SFR 098-092-013 $14.94SFR 098-092-014 $14.94SFR 098-092-015 $14.94SFR 098-092-016 $14.94SFR 098-092-017 $14.94SFR 098-092-018 $14.94SFR 098-092-019 $14.94SFR 098-092-020 $14.94SFR 098-092-021 $14.94SFR 098-092-022 $14.94SFR 098-092-023 $14.94SFR 098-092-024 $14.94SFR 098-092-025 $14.94SFR 098-092-026 $14.94SFR 098-092-027 $14.94SFR 098-092-028 $14.94SFR 098-092-029 $14.94SFR 098-092-030 $14.94SFR 098-092-031 $14.94SFR 098-092-032 $14.94SFR 098-092-033 $14.94SFR 098-092-034 $14.94SFR 098-092-035 $14.94SFR 098-092-036 $14.94SFR 098-092-037 $14.94SFR 098-092-038 $14.94SFR 098-092-039 $14.94SFR 098-092-040 $14.94SFR 098-092-041 $14.94SFR 098-092-042 $14.94SFR 098-092-043 $14.94SFR 098-092-044 $14.94SFR 098-092-045 $14.94SFR 098-092-046 $14.94SFR 098-092-047 $14.94SFR 098-092-048 $14.94SFR 098-093-001 $14.94SFR 098-093-002 $14.94SFR 098-093-003 $14.94SFR 098-093-004 $14.94SFR 098-093-005 $14.94SFR 098-093-006 $14.94SFR 098-093-007 $14.94SFR 098-093-008 $14.94SFR 098-093-009 $14.94SFR 098-093-010 $14.94SFR 098-093-011 $14.94SFR 098-093-012 $14.94SFR 098-093-013 $14.94SFR 098-093-014 $14.94SFR 098-093-015 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-093-016 $14.94SFR 098-093-017 $14.94SFR 098-093-018 $14.94SFR 098-093-019 $14.94SFR 098-093-020 $14.94SFR 098-093-021 $14.94SFR 098-094-001 $14.94SFR 098-094-002 $14.94SFR 098-094-003 $14.94SFR 098-094-004 $14.94SFR 098-094-005 $14.94SFR 098-094-006 $14.94SFR 098-094-007 $14.94SFR 098-094-008 $14.94SFR 098-094-009 $14.94SFR 098-094-010 $14.94SFR 098-094-011 $14.94SFR 098-094-012 $14.94SFR 098-094-013 $14.94SFR 098-094-014 $14.94SFR 098-094-015 $14.94SFR 098-094-016 $14.94SFR 098-094-017 $14.94SFR 098-094-018 $14.94SFR 098-094-019 $14.94SFR 098-094-020 $14.94SFR 098-094-021 $14.94SFR 098-094-022 $14.94SFR 098-094-023 $14.94SFR 098-101-001 $14.94SFR 098-101-002 $14.94SFR 098-101-004 $14.94SFR 098-101-005 $14.94SFR 098-101-006 $14.94SFR 098-101-007 $14.94SFR 098-101-008 $14.94SFR 098-101-009 $14.94SFR 098-101-010 $14.94SFR 098-101-011 $14.94SFR 098-101-012 $14.94SFR 098-101-013 $14.94SFR 098-101-014 $14.94SFR 098-101-015 $14.94SFR 098-101-016 $14.94SFR 098-101-017 $14.94SFR 098-101-018 $14.94SFR 098-101-019 $14.94SFR 098-102-001 $14.94SFR 098-102-002 $14.94SFR 098-102-003 $14.94SFR 098-102-004 $14.94SFR 098-102-005 $14.94SFR - 56 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-102-006 $14.94SFR 098-102-007 $14.94SFR 098-102-008 $14.94SFR 098-102-009 $14.94SFR 098-102-010 $14.94SFR 098-102-011 $14.94SFR 098-102-012 $14.94SFR 098-103-001 $14.94SFR 098-103-002 $14.94SFR 098-103-003 $14.94SFR 098-103-004 $14.94SFR 098-103-005 $14.94SFR 098-103-006 $14.94SFR 098-103-007 $14.94SFR 098-103-008 $14.94SFR 098-103-009 $14.94SFR 098-103-010 $14.94SFR 098-103-011 $14.94SFR 098-103-012 $14.94SFR 098-103-013 $14.94SFR 098-103-014 $14.94SFR 098-103-015 $14.94SFR 098-103-016 $14.94SFR 098-103-017 $14.94SFR 098-103-018 $14.94SFR 098-103-019 $14.94SFR 098-104-001 $14.94SFR 098-104-002 $14.94SFR 098-104-003 $14.94SFR 098-105-001 $14.94SFR 098-105-002 $14.94SFR 098-105-003 $14.94SFR 098-105-004 $14.94SFR 098-105-005 $14.94SFR 098-105-006 $14.94SFR 098-105-007 $14.94SFR 098-105-008 $14.94SFR 098-106-001 $14.94SFR 098-106-002 $14.94SFR 098-106-003 $14.94SFR 098-106-004 $14.94SFR 098-121-001 $14.94SFR 098-121-002 $14.94SFR 098-121-003 $14.94SFR 098-121-004 $14.94SFR 098-121-006 $14.94SFR 098-121-007 $14.94SFR 098-122-001 $14.94SFR 098-122-002 $14.94SFR 098-122-003 $14.94SFR 098-123-001 $14.94SFR 098-123-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-123-003 $14.94SFR 098-123-004 $14.94SFR 098-124-001 $14.94SFR 098-126-010 $14.94SFR 098-126-011 $14.94SFR 098-126-012 $14.94SFR 098-126-013 $14.94SFR 098-126-014 $14.94SFR 098-126-015 $14.94SFR 098-126-016 $14.94SFR 098-126-018 $14.94SFR 098-126-019 $14.94SFR 098-126-020 $14.94SFR 098-126-021 $14.94SFR 098-126-022 $14.94SFR 098-126-023 $14.94SFR 098-126-024 $14.94SFR 098-126-025 $14.94SFR 098-127-009 $14.94SFR 098-127-010 $14.94SFR 098-127-011 $14.94SFR 098-127-012 $14.94SFR 098-127-013 $14.94SFR 098-127-014 $14.94SFR 098-127-015 $14.94SFR 098-127-016 $14.94SFR 098-141-001 $14.94SFR 098-141-002 $14.94SFR 098-141-003 $14.94SFR 098-141-004 $14.94SFR 098-141-005 $14.94SFR 098-141-006 $14.94SFR 098-141-007 $14.94SFR 098-141-008 $14.94SFR 098-141-009 $14.94SFR 098-141-010 $14.94SFR 098-141-011 $14.94SFR 098-141-012 $14.94SFR 098-141-013 $14.94SFR 098-141-014 $14.94SFR 098-141-015 $14.94SFR 098-142-001 $14.94SFR 098-142-002 $14.94SFR 098-142-003 $14.94SFR 098-142-004 $14.94SFR 098-142-005 $14.94SFR 098-142-006 $14.94SFR 098-142-007 $14.94SFR 098-142-008 $14.94SFR 098-142-010 $14.94SFR 098-142-011 $14.94SFR 098-142-012 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-142-013 $14.94SFR 098-142-014 $14.94SFR 098-142-015 $14.94SFR 098-142-016 $14.94SFR 098-142-017 $14.94SFR 098-142-018 $14.94SFR 098-142-019 $14.94SFR 098-142-020 $14.94SFR 098-142-021 $14.94SFR 098-142-022 $14.94SFR 098-142-023 $14.94SFR 098-142-025 $14.94SFR 098-142-026 $14.94SFR 098-142-027 $14.94SFR 098-142-028 $14.94SFR 098-142-029 $14.94SFR 098-142-030 $14.94SFR 098-142-031 $14.94SFR 098-142-032 $14.94SFR 098-143-001 $14.94SFR 098-143-002 $14.94SFR 098-143-003 $14.94SFR 098-143-004 $14.94SFR 098-143-005 $14.94SFR 098-143-006 $14.94SFR 098-143-007 $14.94SFR 098-143-008 $14.94SFR 098-143-009 $14.94SFR 098-143-010 $14.94SFR 098-143-011 $14.94SFR 098-143-012 $14.94SFR 098-143-013 $14.94SFR 098-143-014 $14.94SFR 098-143-015 $14.94SFR 098-155-001 $14.94SFR 098-155-002 $14.94SFR 098-155-003 $14.94SFR 098-155-004 $14.94SFR 098-155-005 $14.94SFR 098-155-006 $14.94SFR 098-155-007 $14.94SFR 098-155-008 $14.94SFR 098-155-009 $14.94SFR 098-155-010 $14.94SFR 098-155-011 $14.94SFR 098-155-012 $14.94SFR 098-155-013 $14.94SFR 098-155-014 $14.94SFR 098-155-015 $14.94SFR 098-155-016 $14.94SFR 098-155-017 $14.94SFR 098-155-018 $14.94SFR - 57 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-155-019 $14.94SFR 098-155-020 $14.94SFR 098-155-021 $14.94SFR 098-155-022 $14.94SFR 098-155-023 $14.94SFR 098-155-024 $14.94SFR 098-155-025 $14.94SFR 098-156-001 $14.94SFR 098-156-002 $14.94SFR 098-156-003 $14.94SFR 098-156-004 $14.94SFR 098-156-005 $14.94SFR 098-156-006 $14.94SFR 098-156-007 $14.94SFR 098-156-008 $14.94SFR 098-156-009 $14.94SFR 098-156-010 $14.94SFR 098-156-011 $14.94SFR 098-161-001 $14.94SFR 098-161-002 $14.94SFR 098-161-003 $14.94SFR 098-161-004 $14.94SFR 098-161-005 $14.94SFR 098-162-004 $14.94SFR 098-162-005 $14.94SFR 098-162-006 $14.94SFR 098-162-007 $14.94SFR 098-162-008 $14.94SFR 098-162-009 $14.94SFR 098-162-010 $14.94SFR 098-162-011 $14.94SFR 098-162-012 $14.94SFR 098-163-004 $14.94SFR 098-163-005 $14.94SFR 098-163-006 $14.94SFR 098-163-007 $14.94SFR 098-163-008 $14.94SFR 098-163-009 $14.94SFR 098-163-010 $14.94SFR 098-163-011 $14.94SFR 098-163-012 $14.94SFR 098-164-004 $14.94SFR 098-164-005 $14.94SFR 098-164-006 $14.94SFR 098-164-007 $14.94SFR 098-164-008 $14.94SFR 098-164-009 $14.94SFR 098-164-010 $14.94SFR 098-164-011 $14.94SFR 098-164-012 $14.94SFR 098-165-001 $14.94SFR 098-165-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-165-003 $14.94SFR 098-165-004 $14.94SFR 098-165-005 $14.94SFR 098-165-006 $14.94SFR 098-165-007 $14.94SFR 098-165-008 $14.94SFR 098-165-009 $14.94SFR 098-165-010 $14.94SFR 098-165-011 $14.94SFR 098-165-012 $14.94SFR 098-165-013 $14.94SFR 098-171-005 $14.94SFR 098-171-006 $14.94SFR 098-171-007 $14.94SFR 098-171-008 $14.94SFR 098-171-009 $14.94SFR 098-171-010 $14.94SFR 098-171-011 $14.94SFR 098-171-012 $14.94SFR 098-172-005 $14.94SFR 098-172-006 $14.94SFR 098-172-007 $14.94SFR 098-172-008 $14.94SFR 098-172-009 $14.94SFR 098-172-010 $14.94SFR 098-172-011 $14.94SFR 098-172-012 $14.94SFR 098-172-013 $14.94SFR 098-172-014 $14.94SFR 098-172-015 $14.94SFR 098-172-016 $14.94SFR 098-172-017 $14.94SFR 098-173-001 $14.94SFR 098-173-002 $14.94SFR 098-173-003 $14.94SFR 098-173-004 $14.94SFR 098-173-005 $14.94SFR 098-173-006 $14.94SFR 098-173-007 $14.94SFR 098-173-008 $14.94SFR 098-173-009 $14.94SFR 098-173-010 $14.94SFR 098-173-011 $14.94SFR 098-173-012 $14.94SFR 098-173-013 $14.94SFR 098-173-014 $14.94SFR 098-173-015 $14.94SFR 098-173-016 $14.94SFR 098-173-017 $14.94SFR 098-174-001 $14.94SFR 098-174-002 $14.94SFR 098-174-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-174-004 $14.94SFR 098-174-005 $14.94SFR 098-174-006 $14.94SFR 098-174-007 $14.94SFR 098-174-008 $14.94SFR 098-174-009 $14.94SFR 098-174-010 $14.94SFR 098-175-001 $14.94SFR 098-175-002 $14.94SFR 098-175-003 $14.94SFR 098-175-004 $14.94SFR 098-175-005 $14.94SFR 098-175-006 $14.94SFR 098-175-007 $14.94SFR 098-175-008 $14.94SFR 098-175-009 $14.94SFR 098-175-010 $14.94SFR 098-175-011 $14.94SFR 098-175-012 $14.94SFR 098-175-013 $14.94SFR 098-180-005 $7.46VSFR 098-180-007 $14.94SFR 098-180-010 $14.94SFR 098-180-015 $14.94SFR 098-180-016 $14.94SFR 098-180-017 $14.94SFR 098-180-021 $14.94SFR 098-180-022 $14.94SFR 098-180-025 $14.94SFR 098-180-026 $14.94SFR 098-180-028 $14.94SFR 098-180-029 $14.94SFR 098-180-033 $14.94SFR 098-180-034 $14.94SFR 098-180-035 $14.94SFR 098-180-036 $14.94SFR 098-180-037 $14.94SFR 098-180-041 $7.46VSFR 098-180-043 $7.46VSFR 098-190-002 $14.94SFR 098-190-003 $14.94SFR 098-190-004 $14.94SFR 098-190-006 $14.94SFR 098-190-008 $14.94SFR 098-190-015 $74.70INST 098-190-017 $14.94SFR 098-190-018 $14.94SFR 098-190-019 $14.94SFR 098-190-024 $14.94SFR 098-190-025 $14.94SFR 098-190-026 $14.94SFR 098-190-028 $14.94SFR - 58 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-190-029 $14.94SFR 098-190-030 $14.94SFR 098-210-001 $7.46VSFR 098-210-026 $74.70COM 098-230-001 $14.94SFR 098-230-007 $14.94SFR 098-230-022 $14.94SFR 098-230-023 $7.46VSFR 098-230-048 $74.70IND 098-230-049 $74.70INST 098-230-050 $7.46VCOM 098-240-003 $7.46MISC 098-240-024 $74.70IND 098-240-057 $74.70COM 098-240-060 $119.52MFR8 098-240-064 $7.46VMFR 098-250-019 $7.46MISC 098-250-020 $7.46MISC 098-281-001 $14.94SFR 098-281-002 $14.94SFR 098-281-003 $7.46VSFR 098-281-004 $14.94SFR 098-281-005 $14.94SFR 098-281-006 $14.94SFR 098-281-007 $14.94SFR 098-281-008 $14.94SFR 098-281-009 $14.94SFR 098-281-010 $14.94SFR 098-281-011 $14.94SFR 098-282-001 $14.94SFR 098-282-002 $14.94SFR 098-282-003 $14.94SFR 098-282-004 $14.94SFR 098-282-005 $14.94SFR 098-282-006 $14.94SFR 098-282-007 $14.94SFR 098-282-008 $14.94SFR 098-282-009 $14.94SFR 098-282-010 $14.94SFR 098-282-011 $14.94SFR 098-282-012 $14.94SFR 098-291-001 $14.94SFR 098-291-002 $14.94SFR 098-291-003 $14.94SFR 098-291-004 $14.94SFR 098-291-005 $14.94SFR 098-291-006 $14.94SFR 098-291-007 $14.94SFR 098-291-008 $14.94SFR 098-291-009 $14.94SFR 098-291-010 $14.94SFR 098-291-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-291-012 $14.94SFR 098-291-013 $14.94SFR 098-291-014 $14.94SFR 098-291-015 $14.94SFR 098-292-001 $14.94SFR 098-292-002 $14.94SFR 098-292-003 $14.94SFR 098-292-004 $14.94SFR 098-292-005 $14.94SFR 098-292-006 $14.94SFR 098-292-007 $14.94SFR 098-292-008 $14.94SFR 098-292-009 $14.94SFR 098-292-010 $14.94SFR 098-292-011 $14.94SFR 098-292-012 $14.94SFR 098-292-013 $14.94SFR 098-292-014 $14.94SFR 098-292-015 $14.94SFR 098-292-016 $14.94SFR 098-292-017 $14.94SFR 098-292-018 $14.94SFR 098-292-019 $14.94SFR 098-292-020 $14.94SFR 098-292-021 $14.94SFR 098-292-022 $14.94SFR 098-292-023 $14.94SFR 098-292-024 $14.94SFR 098-292-025 $14.94SFR 098-292-026 $14.94SFR 098-292-027 $14.94SFR 098-292-028 $14.94SFR 098-292-029 $14.94SFR 098-293-001 $14.94SFR 098-293-002 $14.94SFR 098-293-003 $14.94SFR 098-293-004 $14.94SFR 098-293-005 $14.94SFR 098-293-006 $14.94SFR 098-294-001 $14.94SFR 098-294-002 $14.94SFR 098-294-003 $14.94SFR 098-294-004 $14.94SFR 098-295-001 $14.94SFR 098-295-002 $14.94SFR 098-301-001 $14.94SFR 098-301-002 $14.94SFR 098-301-003 $14.94SFR 098-301-004 $14.94SFR 098-301-005 $14.94SFR 098-301-006 $14.94SFR 098-301-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-301-008 $14.94SFR 098-301-009 $14.94SFR 098-301-010 $14.94SFR 098-301-011 $14.94SFR 098-301-012 $14.94SFR 098-301-013 $14.94SFR 098-301-014 $14.94SFR 098-301-015 $14.94SFR 098-302-001 $14.94SFR 098-302-002 $14.94SFR 098-302-003 $14.94SFR 098-302-004 $14.94SFR 098-302-005 $14.94SFR 098-302-006 $14.94SFR 098-302-007 $14.94SFR 098-302-008 $14.94SFR 098-302-009 $14.94SFR 098-302-010 $14.94SFR 098-302-011 $14.94SFR 098-302-012 $14.94SFR 098-302-013 $14.94SFR 098-302-014 $14.94SFR 098-302-015 $14.94SFR 098-311-001 $14.94SFR 098-311-002 $14.94SFR 098-311-003 $14.94SFR 098-311-004 $14.94SFR 098-311-005 $14.94SFR 098-311-006 $14.94SFR 098-311-007 $14.94SFR 098-311-008 $14.94SFR 098-311-009 $14.94SFR 098-311-010 $14.94SFR 098-311-011 $14.94SFR 098-311-012 $14.94SFR 098-311-013 $14.94SFR 098-311-014 $14.94SFR 098-311-015 $14.94SFR 098-312-001 $14.94SFR 098-312-002 $14.94SFR 098-312-003 $14.94SFR 098-312-004 $14.94SFR 098-312-005 $14.94SFR 098-312-006 $14.94SFR 098-312-007 $14.94SFR 098-312-008 $14.94SFR 098-312-009 $14.94SFR 098-312-010 $14.94SFR 098-312-011 $14.94SFR 098-312-012 $14.94SFR 098-312-013 $14.94SFR 098-312-014 $14.94SFR - 59 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-312-015 $14.94SFR 098-312-016 $14.94SFR 098-312-017 $14.94SFR 098-312-018 $14.94SFR 098-313-001 $14.94SFR 098-313-002 $14.94SFR 098-313-003 $14.94SFR 098-313-004 $14.94SFR 098-313-005 $14.94SFR 098-313-006 $14.94SFR 098-313-007 $14.94SFR 098-313-008 $14.94SFR 098-313-009 $14.94SFR 098-313-010 $14.94SFR 098-313-011 $14.94SFR 098-313-012 $14.94SFR 098-313-013 $14.94SFR 098-313-014 $14.94SFR 098-313-015 $14.94SFR 098-313-016 $14.94SFR 098-313-017 $14.94SFR 098-313-018 $14.94SFR 098-313-019 $14.94SFR 098-313-020 $14.94SFR 098-313-021 $14.94SFR 098-313-022 $14.94SFR 098-314-001 $14.94SFR 098-314-002 $14.94SFR 098-314-003 $14.94SFR 098-314-004 $14.94SFR 098-314-005 $14.94SFR 098-314-006 $14.94SFR 098-314-007 $14.94SFR 098-314-008 $14.94SFR 098-314-009 $14.94SFR 098-314-010 $14.94SFR 098-314-011 $14.94SFR 098-314-012 $14.94SFR 098-314-013 $14.94SFR 098-314-014 $14.94SFR 098-314-015 $14.94SFR 098-314-016 $14.94SFR 098-314-017 $14.94SFR 098-314-018 $14.94SFR 098-314-019 $14.94SFR 098-314-020 $14.94SFR 098-321-001 $14.94SFR 098-321-002 $14.94SFR 098-321-003 $14.94SFR 098-321-004 $14.94SFR 098-321-005 $14.94SFR 098-321-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-321-007 $14.94SFR 098-321-008 $14.94SFR 098-321-009 $14.94SFR 098-321-010 $14.94SFR 098-321-011 $14.94SFR 098-321-012 $14.94SFR 098-322-001 $14.94SFR 098-322-002 $14.94SFR 098-322-003 $14.94SFR 098-322-004 $14.94SFR 098-322-005 $14.94SFR 098-322-006 $14.94SFR 098-322-007 $14.94SFR 098-322-008 $14.94SFR 098-322-009 $14.94SFR 098-322-010 $14.94SFR 098-322-011 $14.94SFR 098-322-012 $14.94SFR 098-322-013 $14.94SFR 098-322-014 $14.94SFR 098-322-015 $14.94SFR 098-322-016 $14.94SFR 098-322-017 $14.94SFR 098-322-018 $14.94SFR 098-322-019 $14.94SFR 098-322-020 $14.94SFR 098-322-021 $14.94SFR 098-322-022 $14.94SFR 098-322-023 $14.94SFR 098-322-024 $14.94SFR 098-322-025 $14.94SFR 098-322-026 $14.94SFR 098-331-001 $14.94SFR 098-331-002 $14.94SFR 098-331-003 $14.94SFR 098-331-004 $14.94SFR 098-331-005 $14.94SFR 098-331-006 $14.94SFR 098-331-007 $14.94SFR 098-331-008 $14.94SFR 098-331-009 $14.94SFR 098-331-010 $14.94SFR 098-331-011 $14.94SFR 098-331-012 $14.94SFR 098-331-013 $14.94SFR 098-331-014 $14.94SFR 098-331-015 $14.94SFR 098-331-016 $14.94SFR 098-331-017 $14.94SFR 098-331-018 $14.94SFR 098-331-019 $14.94SFR 098-331-020 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-331-021 $14.94SFR 098-331-022 $14.94SFR 098-331-023 $14.94SFR 098-331-024 $14.94SFR 098-331-025 $14.94SFR 098-331-026 $14.94SFR 098-331-027 $14.94SFR 098-331-028 $14.94SFR 098-331-029 $14.94SFR 098-331-030 $14.94SFR 098-332-001 $14.94SFR 098-332-002 $14.94SFR 098-332-003 $14.94SFR 098-332-004 $14.94SFR 098-332-005 $14.94SFR 098-332-006 $14.94SFR 098-332-007 $14.94SFR 098-332-008 $14.94SFR 098-332-009 $14.94SFR 098-332-010 $14.94SFR 098-332-011 $14.94SFR 098-332-012 $14.94SFR 098-332-013 $14.94SFR 098-332-014 $14.94SFR 098-332-015 $14.94SFR 098-332-016 $14.94SFR 098-332-017 $14.94SFR 098-332-018 $14.94SFR 098-333-001 $14.94SFR 098-333-002 $14.94SFR 098-333-003 $14.94SFR 098-333-004 $14.94SFR 098-333-005 $14.94SFR 098-333-006 $14.94SFR 098-333-007 $14.94SFR 098-333-008 $14.94SFR 098-334-001 $14.94SFR 098-334-002 $14.94SFR 098-334-003 $14.94SFR 098-334-004 $14.94SFR 098-334-005 $14.94SFR 098-340-002 $74.70COM 098-340-009 $7.46VCOM 098-350-013 $14.94SFR 098-350-014 $14.94SFR 098-350-015 $14.94SFR 098-350-016 $14.94SFR 098-350-017 $14.94SFR 098-350-018 $14.94SFR 098-350-019 $14.94SFR 098-350-020 $14.94SFR 098-350-021 $14.94SFR - 60 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-350-022 $14.94SFR 098-350-023 $14.94SFR 098-350-024 $14.94SFR 098-350-025 $14.94SFR 098-350-026 $14.94SFR 098-350-027 $14.94SFR 098-350-028 $14.94SFR 098-350-029 $14.94SFR 098-350-030 $14.94SFR 098-350-031 $14.94SFR 098-350-032 $14.94SFR 098-350-033 $14.94SFR 098-350-034 $14.94SFR 098-350-035 $14.94SFR 098-350-036 $14.94SFR 098-350-037 $14.94SFR 098-350-038 $14.94SFR 098-350-039 $14.94SFR 098-350-040 $14.94SFR 098-350-041 $14.94SFR 098-350-042 $14.94SFR 098-350-043 $14.94SFR 098-351-001 $14.94SFR 098-351-002 $14.94SFR 098-351-003 $14.94SFR 098-351-004 $14.94SFR 098-351-005 $14.94SFR 098-351-006 $14.94SFR 098-351-007 $14.94SFR 098-351-008 $14.94SFR 098-351-009 $14.94SFR 098-351-010 $14.94SFR 098-351-011 $14.94SFR 098-351-012 $14.94SFR 098-361-001 $14.94SFR 098-361-002 $14.94SFR 098-361-003 $14.94SFR 098-361-004 $14.94SFR 098-361-005 $14.94SFR 098-361-006 $14.94SFR 098-361-007 $14.94SFR 098-361-008 $14.94SFR 098-361-009 $14.94SFR 098-361-010 $14.94SFR 098-361-011 $14.94SFR 098-361-012 $14.94SFR 098-361-013 $14.94SFR 098-361-014 $14.94SFR 098-361-015 $14.94SFR 098-361-016 $14.94SFR 098-361-017 $14.94SFR 098-361-018 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-361-019 $14.94SFR 098-361-020 $14.94SFR 098-361-021 $14.94SFR 098-362-002 $14.94SFR 098-362-003 $14.94SFR 098-362-004 $14.94SFR 098-362-005 $14.94SFR 098-362-006 $14.94SFR 098-362-007 $14.94SFR 098-362-008 $14.94SFR 098-362-009 $14.94SFR 098-362-010 $14.94SFR 098-362-011 $74.70MFR5 098-371-003 $14.94SFR 098-371-004 $14.94SFR 098-371-005 $14.94SFR 098-371-006 $14.94SFR 098-371-007 $14.94SFR 098-371-008 $14.94SFR 098-371-009 $14.94SFR 098-371-010 $14.94SFR 098-371-011 $14.94SFR 098-371-012 $14.94SFR 098-371-013 $14.94SFR 098-371-014 $14.94SFR 098-371-015 $14.94SFR 098-371-016 $14.94SFR 098-371-017 $14.94SFR 098-371-018 $14.94SFR 098-371-019 $14.94SFR 098-371-020 $14.94SFR 098-371-021 $14.94SFR 098-371-022 $14.94SFR 098-372-001 $14.94SFR 098-372-002 $14.94SFR 098-372-003 $14.94SFR 098-372-004 $14.94SFR 098-372-005 $14.94SFR 098-372-006 $14.94SFR 098-372-007 $14.94SFR 098-372-008 $14.94SFR 098-372-009 $14.94SFR 098-372-010 $14.94SFR 098-372-011 $14.94SFR 098-372-012 $14.94SFR 098-372-013 $14.94SFR 098-373-001 $14.94SFR 098-373-002 $14.94SFR 098-373-003 $14.94SFR 098-373-004 $14.94SFR 098-373-005 $14.94SFR 098-373-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-373-007 $14.94SFR 098-373-008 $14.94SFR 098-373-009 $14.94SFR 098-373-010 $14.94SFR 098-373-011 $14.94SFR 098-373-012 $14.94SFR 098-373-013 $14.94SFR 098-373-014 $14.94SFR 098-373-015 $14.94SFR 098-373-016 $14.94SFR 098-373-017 $14.94SFR 098-373-018 $14.94SFR 098-373-019 $14.94SFR 098-373-020 $14.94SFR 098-373-021 $14.94SFR 098-373-022 $14.94SFR 098-373-023 $14.94SFR 098-373-024 $14.94SFR 098-373-025 $14.94SFR 098-373-026 $14.94SFR 098-373-027 $14.94SFR 098-373-028 $14.94SFR 098-374-001 $14.94SFR 098-374-002 $14.94SFR 098-374-003 $14.94SFR 098-374-004 $14.94SFR 098-374-005 $14.94SFR 098-374-006 $14.94SFR 098-381-001 $14.94SFR 098-381-002 $14.94SFR 098-381-003 $14.94SFR 098-381-004 $14.94SFR 098-381-005 $14.94SFR 098-381-006 $14.94SFR 098-381-007 $14.94SFR 098-381-008 $14.94SFR 098-381-009 $14.94SFR 098-381-010 $14.94SFR 098-381-011 $14.94SFR 098-381-012 $14.94SFR 098-381-013 $14.94SFR 098-381-014 $14.94SFR 098-381-015 $14.94SFR 098-381-016 $14.94SFR 098-381-017 $14.94SFR 098-381-018 $14.94SFR 098-381-019 $14.94SFR 098-381-020 $14.94SFR 098-381-021 $14.94SFR 098-381-022 $14.94SFR 098-381-023 $14.94SFR 098-381-024 $14.94SFR - 61 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-381-025 $14.94SFR 098-381-026 $14.94SFR 098-381-027 $14.94SFR 098-381-028 $14.94SFR 098-381-029 $14.94SFR 098-381-030 $14.94SFR 098-381-031 $14.94SFR 098-381-032 $14.94SFR 098-381-033 $14.94SFR 098-381-034 $14.94SFR 098-382-001 $14.94SFR 098-382-002 $14.94SFR 098-382-003 $14.94SFR 098-382-004 $14.94SFR 098-382-005 $14.94SFR 098-382-006 $14.94SFR 098-382-007 $14.94SFR 098-382-008 $14.94SFR 098-382-009 $14.94SFR 098-382-010 $14.94SFR 098-382-011 $14.94SFR 098-382-012 $14.94SFR 098-382-013 $14.94SFR 098-382-014 $14.94SFR 098-382-015 $14.94SFR 098-382-016 $14.94SFR 098-382-017 $14.94SFR 098-382-018 $14.94SFR 098-382-019 $14.94SFR 098-382-020 $14.94SFR 098-382-021 $14.94SFR 098-382-022 $14.94SFR 098-382-023 $14.94SFR 098-382-024 $14.94SFR 098-382-025 $14.94SFR 098-382-026 $14.94SFR 098-382-027 $14.94SFR 098-382-028 $14.94SFR 098-382-029 $14.94SFR 098-382-030 $14.94SFR 098-382-031 $14.94SFR 098-382-032 $14.94SFR 098-383-001 $14.94SFR 098-383-002 $14.94SFR 098-383-003 $14.94SFR 098-383-004 $14.94SFR 098-383-005 $14.94SFR 098-383-006 $14.94SFR 098-383-007 $14.94SFR 098-383-008 $14.94SFR 098-383-009 $14.94SFR 098-383-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-383-011 $14.94SFR 098-383-012 $14.94SFR 098-383-013 $14.94SFR 098-383-014 $14.94SFR 098-383-015 $14.94SFR 098-383-016 $14.94SFR 098-383-017 $14.94SFR 098-383-018 $14.94SFR 098-383-019 $14.94SFR 098-383-020 $14.94SFR 098-383-021 $14.94SFR 098-383-022 $14.94SFR 098-383-023 $14.94SFR 098-383-024 $14.94SFR 098-383-025 $14.94SFR 098-383-026 $14.94SFR 098-383-027 $14.94SFR 098-383-028 $14.94SFR 098-383-029 $14.94SFR 098-383-030 $14.94SFR 098-383-031 $14.94SFR 098-383-032 $14.94SFR 098-383-033 $14.94SFR 098-383-034 $14.94SFR 098-383-035 $14.94SFR 098-383-036 $14.94SFR 098-383-037 $14.94SFR 098-383-038 $14.94SFR 098-391-001 $14.94SFR 098-391-002 $14.94SFR 098-391-003 $14.94SFR 098-391-004 $14.94SFR 098-391-005 $14.94SFR 098-391-006 $14.94SFR 098-391-007 $14.94SFR 098-391-008 $14.94SFR 098-391-009 $14.94SFR 098-391-010 $14.94SFR 098-391-011 $14.94SFR 098-391-012 $14.94SFR 098-391-013 $14.94SFR 098-391-014 $14.94SFR 098-391-015 $14.94SFR 098-391-016 $14.94SFR 098-391-017 $14.94SFR 098-391-018 $14.94SFR 098-391-019 $14.94SFR 098-391-020 $14.94SFR 098-391-021 $14.94SFR 098-391-022 $14.94SFR 098-392-001 $14.94SFR 098-392-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-392-003 $14.94SFR 098-392-004 $14.94SFR 098-392-005 $14.94SFR 098-392-006 $14.94SFR 098-392-007 $14.94SFR 098-392-008 $14.94SFR 098-392-009 $14.94SFR 098-392-010 $14.94SFR 098-392-011 $14.94SFR 098-392-012 $14.94SFR 098-392-013 $14.94SFR 098-392-014 $14.94SFR 098-392-015 $14.94SFR 098-392-016 $14.94SFR 098-392-017 $14.94SFR 098-392-018 $14.94SFR 098-392-019 $14.94SFR 098-392-020 $14.94SFR 098-392-021 $14.94SFR 098-392-022 $14.94SFR 098-392-023 $14.94SFR 098-392-024 $14.94SFR 098-392-025 $14.94SFR 098-392-026 $14.94SFR 098-392-027 $14.94SFR 098-392-028 $14.94SFR 098-392-029 $14.94SFR 098-393-001 $14.94SFR 098-393-002 $14.94SFR 098-393-003 $14.94SFR 098-393-004 $14.94SFR 098-393-005 $14.94SFR 098-393-006 $14.94SFR 098-393-007 $14.94SFR 098-393-008 $14.94SFR 098-393-009 $14.94SFR 098-393-010 $14.94SFR 098-393-011 $14.94SFR 098-393-012 $14.94SFR 098-393-013 $14.94SFR 098-393-014 $14.94SFR 098-393-015 $14.94SFR 098-393-016 $14.94SFR 098-393-017 $14.94SFR 098-393-018 $14.94SFR 098-393-019 $14.94SFR 098-393-020 $14.94SFR 098-393-021 $14.94SFR 098-393-022 $14.94SFR 098-393-023 $14.94SFR 098-393-024 $14.94SFR 098-393-025 $14.94SFR - 62 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-393-026 $14.94SFR 098-393-027 $14.94SFR 098-401-001 $14.94SFR 098-401-002 $7.46CONDO 098-401-003 $7.46CONDO 098-401-004 $7.46CONDO 098-401-005 $7.46CONDO 098-401-006 $7.46CONDO 098-401-007 $7.46CONDO 098-401-008 $7.46CONDO 098-401-009 $7.46CONDO 098-401-010 $7.46CONDO 098-401-011 $7.46CONDO 098-401-012 $7.46CONDO 098-401-013 $7.46CONDO 098-401-014 $7.46CONDO 098-401-015 $7.46CONDO 098-401-016 $7.46CONDO 098-401-017 $7.46CONDO 098-401-018 $7.46CONDO 098-401-019 $7.46CONDO 098-401-020 $7.46CONDO 098-401-021 $7.46CONDO 098-401-022 $7.46CONDO 098-401-023 $7.46CONDO 098-401-024 $7.46CONDO 098-401-025 $7.46CONDO 098-401-026 $14.94SFR 098-401-027 $7.46CONDO 098-401-028 $7.46CONDO 098-401-029 $7.46CONDO 098-401-030 $7.46CONDO 098-401-031 $7.46CONDO 098-401-032 $7.46CONDO 098-402-001 $7.46CONDO 098-402-002 $7.46CONDO 098-402-003 $7.46CONDO 098-402-004 $7.46CONDO 098-402-005 $14.94SFR 098-402-006 $7.46CONDO 098-402-007 $7.46CONDO 098-402-008 $7.46CONDO 098-402-009 $7.46CONDO 098-402-010 $7.46CONDO 098-402-011 $7.46CONDO 098-402-012 $7.46CONDO 098-402-013 $7.46CONDO 098-402-014 $7.46CONDO 098-402-015 $7.46CONDO 098-403-001 $14.94SFR 098-403-002 $14.94SFR 098-403-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-403-004 $14.94SFR 098-403-005 $14.94SFR 098-404-001 $7.46CONDO 098-404-002 $7.46CONDO 098-404-003 $7.46CONDO 098-404-004 $7.46CONDO 098-404-005 $7.46CONDO 098-404-006 $7.46CONDO 098-404-007 $7.46CONDO 098-404-008 $7.46CONDO 098-404-009 $7.46CONDO 098-404-010 $7.46CONDO 098-404-011 $14.94SFR 098-405-001 $7.46CONDO 098-405-002 $7.46CONDO 098-405-003 $7.46CONDO 098-405-004 $7.46CONDO 098-405-005 $7.46CONDO 098-405-006 $7.46CONDO 098-405-007 $7.46CONDO 098-405-008 $7.46CONDO 098-405-009 $7.46CONDO 098-405-010 $7.46CONDO 098-405-011 $7.46CONDO 098-405-012 $7.46CONDO 098-405-013 $7.46CONDO 098-405-014 $7.46CONDO 098-405-015 $7.46CONDO 098-405-016 $7.46CONDO 098-405-017 $7.46CONDO 098-405-018 $7.46CONDO 098-405-019 $7.46CONDO 098-405-020 $7.46CONDO 098-405-021 $7.46CONDO 098-405-022 $7.46CONDO 098-405-023 $14.94SFR 098-405-024 $14.94SFR 098-405-025 $7.46CONDO 098-405-026 $7.46CONDO 098-405-027 $7.46CONDO 098-405-028 $7.46CONDO 098-405-029 $7.46CONDO 098-405-030 $7.46CONDO 098-405-031 $7.46CONDO 098-405-032 $7.46CONDO 098-405-033 $7.46CONDO 098-405-034 $7.46CONDO 098-405-035 $7.46CONDO 098-405-036 $7.46CONDO 098-405-037 $7.46CONDO 098-405-038 $7.46CONDO 098-405-039 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-405-040 $7.46CONDO 098-405-041 $7.46CONDO 098-405-042 $7.46CONDO 098-405-043 $7.46CONDO 098-405-044 $7.46CONDO 098-405-045 $7.46CONDO 098-405-046 $7.46CONDO 098-405-047 $7.46CONDO 098-405-048 $7.46CONDO 098-405-049 $7.46CONDO 098-405-050 $7.46CONDO 098-405-051 $7.46CONDO 098-405-052 $7.46CONDO 098-405-053 $7.46CONDO 098-405-054 $7.46CONDO 098-406-001 $14.94SFR 098-406-002 $7.46CONDO 098-406-003 $7.46CONDO 098-406-004 $7.46CONDO 098-406-005 $7.46CONDO 098-406-006 $7.46CONDO 098-406-007 $7.46CONDO 098-406-008 $7.46CONDO 098-406-009 $7.46CONDO 098-406-010 $7.46CONDO 098-406-011 $7.46CONDO 098-406-012 $7.46CONDO 098-406-013 $7.46CONDO 098-406-014 $14.94SFR 098-406-015 $14.94SFR 098-406-016 $7.46CONDO 098-406-017 $7.46CONDO 098-406-018 $7.46CONDO 098-406-019 $7.46CONDO 098-406-020 $14.94SFR 098-406-021 $14.94SFR 098-406-022 $7.46CONDO 098-406-023 $7.46CONDO 098-406-024 $14.94SFR 098-406-025 $7.46CONDO 098-406-026 $7.46CONDO 098-406-027 $7.46CONDO 098-406-028 $7.46CONDO 098-406-029 $7.46CONDO 098-406-030 $7.46CONDO 098-411-001 $14.94SFR 098-411-002 $14.94SFR 098-411-003 $14.94SFR 098-411-004 $14.94SFR 098-411-005 $14.94SFR 098-411-006 $14.94SFR 098-411-007 $14.94SFR - 63 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-411-008 $14.94SFR 098-411-009 $14.94SFR 098-411-010 $14.94SFR 098-411-011 $14.94SFR 098-411-012 $14.94SFR 098-411-013 $14.94SFR 098-411-014 $14.94SFR 098-411-015 $14.94SFR 098-411-016 $14.94SFR 098-411-017 $14.94SFR 098-411-018 $14.94SFR 098-411-019 $14.94SFR 098-411-020 $14.94SFR 098-412-001 $14.94SFR 098-412-002 $14.94SFR 098-412-003 $14.94SFR 098-412-004 $14.94SFR 098-412-005 $14.94SFR 098-412-006 $14.94SFR 098-412-007 $14.94SFR 098-412-008 $14.94SFR 098-412-009 $14.94SFR 098-412-010 $14.94SFR 098-412-011 $14.94SFR 098-412-012 $14.94SFR 098-412-013 $14.94SFR 098-412-014 $14.94SFR 098-412-015 $14.94SFR 098-412-016 $14.94SFR 098-412-017 $14.94SFR 098-412-018 $14.94SFR 098-412-019 $14.94SFR 098-412-020 $14.94SFR 098-412-021 $14.94SFR 098-412-022 $14.94SFR 098-412-023 $14.94SFR 098-412-024 $14.94SFR 098-412-025 $14.94SFR 098-412-026 $14.94SFR 098-412-027 $14.94SFR 098-412-028 $14.94SFR 098-412-029 $14.94SFR 098-413-001 $14.94SFR 098-413-002 $14.94SFR 098-413-003 $14.94SFR 098-413-004 $14.94SFR 098-413-005 $14.94SFR 098-413-006 $14.94SFR 098-413-007 $14.94SFR 098-413-008 $14.94SFR 098-413-009 $14.94SFR 098-413-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-413-011 $14.94SFR 098-413-012 $14.94SFR 098-413-013 $14.94SFR 098-413-014 $14.94SFR 098-413-015 $14.94SFR 098-413-016 $14.94SFR 098-413-017 $14.94SFR 098-413-018 $14.94SFR 098-413-019 $14.94SFR 098-413-020 $14.94SFR 098-413-021 $14.94SFR 098-413-022 $14.94SFR 098-413-023 $14.94SFR 098-413-024 $14.94SFR 098-413-025 $14.94SFR 098-413-026 $14.94SFR 098-413-027 $14.94SFR 098-413-028 $14.94SFR 098-413-029 $14.94SFR 098-413-030 $14.94SFR 098-413-031 $14.94SFR 098-413-032 $14.94SFR 098-413-033 $14.94SFR 098-413-034 $14.94SFR 098-413-035 $14.94SFR 098-413-036 $14.94SFR 098-413-037 $14.94SFR 098-413-038 $14.94SFR 098-413-039 $14.94SFR 098-413-040 $14.94SFR 098-413-041 $14.94SFR 098-413-042 $14.94SFR 098-413-043 $14.94SFR 098-413-044 $14.94SFR 098-414-001 $14.94SFR 098-414-002 $14.94SFR 098-414-003 $14.94SFR 098-414-004 $14.94SFR 098-414-005 $14.94SFR 098-414-006 $14.94SFR 098-421-001 $14.94SFR 098-421-002 $14.94SFR 098-421-003 $14.94SFR 098-421-004 $14.94SFR 098-421-005 $14.94SFR 098-421-006 $14.94SFR 098-421-007 $14.94SFR 098-421-008 $14.94SFR 098-421-009 $14.94SFR 098-421-010 $14.94SFR 098-421-011 $14.94SFR 098-421-012 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-421-013 $14.94SFR 098-421-014 $14.94SFR 098-421-015 $14.94SFR 098-422-001 $14.94SFR 098-422-002 $14.94SFR 098-422-003 $14.94SFR 098-422-004 $14.94SFR 098-422-005 $14.94SFR 098-422-006 $14.94SFR 098-422-007 $14.94SFR 098-422-008 $14.94SFR 098-422-009 $14.94SFR 098-422-010 $14.94SFR 098-422-011 $14.94SFR 098-422-012 $14.94SFR 098-422-013 $14.94SFR 098-430-001 $7.46CONDO 098-430-002 $7.46CONDO 098-430-003 $7.46CONDO 098-430-004 $7.46CONDO 098-430-005 $7.46CONDO 098-430-006 $7.46CONDO 098-430-007 $7.46CONDO 098-430-008 $7.46CONDO 098-430-009 $7.46CONDO 098-430-010 $7.46CONDO 098-430-011 $7.46CONDO 098-430-012 $7.46CONDO 098-430-013 $7.46CONDO 098-430-014 $7.46CONDO 098-430-015 $7.46CONDO 098-430-016 $7.46CONDO 098-430-017 $7.46CONDO 098-430-018 $7.46CONDO 098-430-019 $14.94SFR 098-430-020 $7.46CONDO 098-430-021 $7.46CONDO 098-430-022 $7.46CONDO 098-430-023 $7.46CONDO 098-430-024 $7.46CONDO 098-430-025 $7.46CONDO 098-430-026 $7.46CONDO 098-430-027 $7.46CONDO 098-430-028 $7.46CONDO 098-430-029 $7.46CONDO 098-430-030 $14.94SFR 098-430-031 $7.46CONDO 098-430-032 $7.46CONDO 098-430-033 $7.46CONDO 098-430-034 $7.46CONDO 098-430-035 $7.46CONDO 098-430-036 $7.46CONDO - 64 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-430-037 $7.46CONDO 098-430-038 $7.46CONDO 098-430-039 $14.94SFR 098-430-040 $7.46CONDO 098-430-041 $7.46CONDO 098-430-042 $7.46CONDO 098-430-043 $7.46CONDO 098-431-001 $7.46CONDO 098-431-002 $7.46CONDO 098-431-003 $14.94SFR 098-431-004 $14.94SFR 098-431-005 $14.94SFR 098-431-006 $7.46CONDO 098-431-007 $7.46CONDO 098-431-008 $7.46CONDO 098-431-009 $7.46CONDO 098-431-010 $7.46CONDO 098-431-011 $7.46CONDO 098-431-012 $14.94SFR 098-431-013 $7.46CONDO 098-431-014 $7.46CONDO 098-431-015 $7.46CONDO 098-431-016 $7.46CONDO 098-431-017 $7.46CONDO 098-431-018 $7.46CONDO 098-432-001 $7.46CONDO 098-432-002 $7.46CONDO 098-432-003 $7.46CONDO 098-432-004 $7.46CONDO 098-432-005 $7.46CONDO 098-432-006 $7.46CONDO 098-432-007 $14.94SFR 098-432-008 $7.46CONDO 098-432-009 $7.46CONDO 098-432-010 $14.94SFR 098-432-011 $7.46CONDO 098-432-012 $7.46CONDO 098-432-013 $7.46CONDO 098-432-014 $7.46CONDO 098-432-015 $7.46CONDO 098-432-016 $7.46CONDO 098-432-017 $7.46CONDO 098-432-018 $7.46CONDO 098-432-019 $7.46CONDO 098-432-020 $7.46CONDO 098-432-021 $14.94SFR 098-432-022 $14.94SFR 098-433-001 $7.46CONDO 098-433-002 $7.46CONDO 098-433-003 $7.46CONDO 098-433-004 $7.46CONDO 098-433-005 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-433-006 $7.46CONDO 098-433-007 $7.46CONDO 098-433-008 $7.46CONDO 098-433-009 $7.46CONDO 098-433-010 $7.46CONDO 098-433-011 $7.46CONDO 098-433-012 $7.46CONDO 098-441-001 $14.94SFR 098-441-002 $14.94SFR 098-441-003 $14.94SFR 098-441-004 $14.94SFR 098-441-005 $14.94SFR 098-441-006 $14.94SFR 098-441-007 $14.94SFR 098-441-008 $14.94SFR 098-441-009 $14.94SFR 098-441-010 $14.94SFR 098-441-011 $14.94SFR 098-441-012 $14.94SFR 098-441-013 $14.94SFR 098-441-014 $14.94SFR 098-441-015 $14.94SFR 098-441-016 $14.94SFR 098-441-017 $14.94SFR 098-441-018 $14.94SFR 098-441-019 $14.94SFR 098-441-020 $14.94SFR 098-441-021 $14.94SFR 098-441-022 $14.94SFR 098-441-023 $14.94SFR 098-441-024 $14.94SFR 098-441-025 $14.94SFR 098-441-026 $14.94SFR 098-441-027 $14.94SFR 098-441-028 $14.94SFR 098-441-029 $14.94SFR 098-441-030 $14.94SFR 098-441-031 $14.94SFR 098-441-032 $14.94SFR 098-441-033 $14.94SFR 098-441-034 $14.94SFR 098-441-035 $14.94SFR 098-441-036 $14.94SFR 098-441-037 $14.94SFR 098-441-038 $14.94SFR 098-441-039 $14.94SFR 098-441-040 $14.94SFR 098-441-041 $14.94SFR 098-441-042 $14.94SFR 098-441-043 $14.94SFR 098-441-044 $14.94SFR 098-441-045 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-441-046 $14.94SFR 098-441-047 $14.94SFR 098-441-048 $14.94SFR 098-441-049 $14.94SFR 098-441-050 $14.94SFR 098-441-051 $14.94SFR 098-441-052 $14.94SFR 098-441-053 $14.94SFR 098-441-054 $14.94SFR 098-441-055 $14.94SFR 098-441-056 $14.94SFR 098-441-057 $14.94SFR 098-441-058 $14.94SFR 098-441-059 $14.94SFR 098-441-060 $14.94SFR 098-442-001 $14.94SFR 098-442-002 $14.94SFR 098-442-003 $14.94SFR 098-442-004 $14.94SFR 098-442-005 $14.94SFR 098-442-006 $14.94SFR 098-442-007 $14.94SFR 098-442-008 $14.94SFR 098-442-009 $14.94SFR 098-442-010 $14.94SFR 098-442-011 $14.94SFR 098-442-012 $14.94SFR 098-442-013 $14.94SFR 098-442-014 $14.94SFR 098-442-015 $14.94SFR 098-442-016 $14.94SFR 098-442-017 $14.94SFR 098-442-018 $14.94SFR 098-442-019 $14.94SFR 098-442-020 $14.94SFR 098-442-021 $14.94SFR 098-442-022 $14.94SFR 098-442-023 $14.94SFR 098-442-024 $14.94SFR 098-442-025 $14.94SFR 098-442-026 $14.94SFR 098-442-027 $14.94SFR 098-442-028 $14.94SFR 098-442-029 $14.94SFR 098-443-001 $14.94SFR 098-443-002 $14.94SFR 098-443-003 $14.94SFR 098-443-004 $14.94SFR 098-443-005 $14.94SFR 098-443-006 $14.94SFR 098-443-007 $14.94SFR 098-443-008 $14.94SFR - 65 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-443-009 $14.94SFR 098-443-010 $14.94SFR 098-443-011 $14.94SFR 098-443-012 $14.94SFR 098-443-013 $14.94SFR 098-443-014 $14.94SFR 098-443-015 $14.94SFR 098-443-016 $14.94SFR 098-443-017 $14.94SFR 098-443-018 $14.94SFR 098-443-019 $14.94SFR 098-443-020 $14.94SFR 098-443-021 $14.94SFR 098-443-022 $14.94SFR 098-443-023 $14.94SFR 098-443-024 $14.94SFR 098-443-025 $14.94SFR 098-443-026 $14.94SFR 098-443-027 $14.94SFR 098-443-028 $14.94SFR 098-443-029 $14.94SFR 098-443-030 $14.94SFR 098-443-031 $14.94SFR 098-443-032 $14.94SFR 098-443-033 $14.94SFR 098-443-034 $14.94SFR 098-443-035 $14.94SFR 098-443-036 $14.94SFR 098-443-037 $14.94SFR 098-443-038 $14.94SFR 098-443-039 $14.94SFR 098-443-040 $14.94SFR 098-450-002 $119.52MFR8 098-461-001 $14.94SFR 098-461-002 $14.94SFR 098-461-003 $14.94SFR 098-461-004 $14.94SFR 098-461-005 $14.94SFR 098-461-006 $14.94SFR 098-461-009 $14.94SFR 098-461-010 $14.94SFR 098-461-011 $14.94SFR 098-461-012 $14.94SFR 098-461-013 $14.94SFR 098-461-014 $14.94SFR 098-461-015 $14.94SFR 098-461-016 $14.94SFR 098-461-017 $14.94SFR 098-461-018 $14.94SFR 098-461-019 $14.94SFR 098-461-020 $14.94SFR 098-461-021 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-461-022 $14.94SFR 098-461-023 $14.94SFR 098-461-024 $14.94SFR 098-461-025 $14.94SFR 098-461-026 $14.94SFR 098-461-027 $14.94SFR 098-461-030 $14.94SFR 098-461-031 $14.94SFR 098-461-032 $14.94SFR 098-461-033 $14.94SFR 098-461-036 $14.94SFR 098-461-037 $14.94SFR 098-461-038 $14.94SFR 098-461-039 $14.94SFR 098-461-040 $14.94SFR 098-461-041 $14.94SFR 098-462-001 $14.94SFR 098-462-002 $14.94SFR 098-462-003 $14.94SFR 098-462-004 $14.94SFR 098-462-005 $14.94SFR 098-462-006 $14.94SFR 098-462-007 $14.94SFR 098-463-001 $14.94SFR 098-463-002 $14.94SFR 098-463-003 $14.94SFR 098-463-004 $14.94SFR 098-463-005 $14.94SFR 098-463-006 $14.94SFR 098-463-007 $14.94SFR 098-463-008 $14.94SFR 098-463-009 $14.94SFR 098-463-010 $14.94SFR 098-463-011 $14.94SFR 098-471-001 $14.94SFR 098-471-002 $14.94SFR 098-471-005 $14.94SFR 098-471-006 $14.94SFR 098-471-007 $14.94SFR 098-471-008 $14.94SFR 098-471-009 $14.94SFR 098-471-010 $14.94SFR 098-471-011 $14.94SFR 098-471-012 $14.94SFR 098-471-013 $14.94SFR 098-471-014 $14.94SFR 098-471-015 $14.94SFR 098-471-016 $14.94SFR 098-471-017 $14.94SFR 098-471-018 $14.94SFR 098-471-019 $14.94SFR 098-471-020 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-471-021 $14.94SFR 098-471-022 $14.94SFR 098-471-025 $14.94SFR 098-471-026 $14.94SFR 098-471-029 $14.94SFR 098-471-030 $14.94SFR 098-472-001 $14.94SFR 098-472-002 $14.94SFR 098-472-003 $14.94SFR 098-472-004 $14.94SFR 098-473-001 $14.94SFR 098-473-002 $14.94SFR 098-473-003 $14.94SFR 098-473-004 $14.94SFR 098-481-001 $14.94SFR 098-481-002 $14.94SFR 098-481-003 $14.94SFR 098-481-004 $14.94SFR 098-481-005 $14.94SFR 098-481-006 $14.94SFR 098-481-007 $14.94SFR 098-481-008 $14.94SFR 098-481-009 $14.94SFR 098-481-010 $14.94SFR 098-481-011 $14.94SFR 098-481-012 $14.94SFR 098-481-013 $14.94SFR 098-481-014 $14.94SFR 098-481-015 $14.94SFR 098-481-016 $14.94SFR 098-481-017 $14.94SFR 098-481-018 $14.94SFR 098-481-019 $14.94SFR 098-481-020 $14.94SFR 098-481-021 $14.94SFR 098-481-022 $14.94SFR 098-481-023 $14.94SFR 098-481-024 $14.94SFR 098-481-025 $14.94SFR 098-481-026 $14.94SFR 098-481-027 $14.94SFR 098-481-028 $14.94SFR 098-482-001 $14.94SFR 098-482-002 $14.94SFR 098-482-003 $14.94SFR 098-482-004 $14.94SFR 098-482-005 $14.94SFR 098-482-006 $14.94SFR 098-482-007 $14.94SFR 098-482-008 $14.94SFR 098-482-009 $14.94SFR 098-482-010 $14.94SFR - 66 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-482-011 $14.94SFR 098-482-012 $14.94SFR 098-482-013 $14.94SFR 098-482-014 $14.94SFR 098-482-015 $14.94SFR 098-482-016 $14.94SFR 098-482-017 $14.94SFR 098-482-018 $14.94SFR 098-482-019 $14.94SFR 098-482-020 $14.94SFR 098-482-021 $14.94SFR 098-482-022 $14.94SFR 098-482-023 $14.94SFR 098-482-024 $14.94SFR 098-482-025 $14.94SFR 098-482-028 $14.94SFR 098-482-029 $14.94SFR 098-482-030 $14.94SFR 098-482-031 $14.94SFR 098-482-032 $14.94SFR 098-482-033 $14.94SFR 098-482-034 $14.94SFR 098-482-035 $14.94SFR 098-483-001 $14.94SFR 098-483-002 $14.94SFR 098-483-003 $14.94SFR 098-483-004 $14.94SFR 098-483-005 $14.94SFR 098-483-006 $14.94SFR 098-491-001 $14.94SFR 098-491-002 $14.94SFR 098-491-003 $14.94SFR 098-491-004 $14.94SFR 098-491-005 $14.94SFR 098-491-006 $14.94SFR 098-491-007 $14.94SFR 098-491-008 $14.94SFR 098-491-009 $14.94SFR 098-491-010 $14.94SFR 098-491-011 $14.94SFR 098-491-012 $14.94SFR 098-491-013 $14.94SFR 098-491-014 $14.94SFR 098-491-015 $14.94SFR 098-491-016 $14.94SFR 098-491-017 $14.94SFR 098-491-018 $14.94SFR 098-491-019 $14.94SFR 098-491-020 $14.94SFR 098-491-021 $14.94SFR 098-491-022 $14.94SFR 098-491-023 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-491-024 $14.94SFR 098-491-025 $14.94SFR 098-491-026 $14.94SFR 098-491-027 $14.94SFR 098-491-028 $14.94SFR 098-491-029 $14.94SFR 098-491-030 $14.94SFR 098-491-031 $14.94SFR 098-491-032 $14.94SFR 098-491-033 $14.94SFR 098-491-034 $14.94SFR 098-491-035 $14.94SFR 098-491-036 $14.94SFR 098-491-037 $14.94SFR 098-491-038 $14.94SFR 098-491-039 $14.94SFR 098-491-040 $14.94SFR 098-491-041 $14.94SFR 098-491-042 $14.94SFR 098-491-043 $14.94SFR 098-491-044 $14.94SFR 098-491-045 $14.94SFR 098-491-046 $14.94SFR 098-491-047 $14.94SFR 098-491-048 $14.94SFR 098-491-049 $14.94SFR 098-491-050 $14.94SFR 098-491-051 $14.94SFR 098-491-052 $14.94SFR 098-491-053 $14.94SFR 098-491-054 $14.94SFR 098-491-055 $14.94SFR 098-491-056 $14.94SFR 098-491-057 $14.94SFR 098-491-058 $14.94SFR 098-491-059 $14.94SFR 098-491-060 $14.94SFR 098-491-061 $14.94SFR 098-491-062 $14.94SFR 098-491-063 $14.94SFR 098-491-064 $14.94SFR 098-491-065 $14.94SFR 098-491-066 $14.94SFR 098-491-067 $14.94SFR 098-491-068 $14.94SFR 098-491-069 $14.94SFR 098-491-070 $14.94SFR 098-491-071 $14.94SFR 098-492-001 $14.94SFR 098-492-002 $14.94SFR 098-492-003 $14.94SFR 098-492-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-492-005 $14.94SFR 098-492-006 $14.94SFR 098-492-007 $14.94SFR 098-492-008 $14.94SFR 098-492-009 $14.94SFR 098-492-010 $14.94SFR 098-492-011 $14.94SFR 098-492-021 $14.94SFR 098-492-022 $14.94SFR 098-492-023 $14.94SFR 098-492-024 $14.94SFR 098-492-025 $14.94SFR 098-492-026 $14.94SFR 098-492-027 $14.94SFR 098-492-028 $14.94SFR 098-492-029 $14.94SFR 098-492-030 $14.94SFR 098-492-031 $14.94SFR 098-492-032 $14.94SFR 098-492-033 $14.94SFR 098-492-034 $14.94SFR 098-492-035 $14.94SFR 098-492-038 $14.94SFR 098-492-039 $14.94SFR 098-492-040 $14.94SFR 098-492-041 $14.94SFR 098-492-042 $14.94SFR 098-492-043 $14.94SFR 098-492-044 $14.94SFR 098-492-045 $14.94SFR 098-492-046 $14.94SFR 098-500-001 $7.46CONDO 098-500-002 $7.46CONDO 098-500-003 $7.46CONDO 098-500-004 $7.46CONDO 098-500-005 $7.46CONDO 098-500-006 $7.46CONDO 098-500-007 $7.46CONDO 098-500-008 $7.46CONDO 098-500-009 $7.46CONDO 098-500-010 $7.46CONDO 098-500-011 $7.46CONDO 098-500-012 $7.46CONDO 098-500-013 $7.46CONDO 098-500-014 $7.46CONDO 098-500-015 $7.46CONDO 098-500-016 $7.46CONDO 098-500-017 $7.46CONDO 098-500-018 $7.46CONDO 098-500-019 $7.46CONDO 098-500-020 $7.46CONDO 098-500-021 $7.46CONDO - 67 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-500-022 $7.46CONDO 098-500-023 $7.46CONDO 098-500-024 $7.46CONDO 098-500-025 $7.46CONDO 098-500-026 $7.46CONDO 098-500-027 $7.46CONDO 098-500-028 $7.46CONDO 098-500-029 $7.46CONDO 098-500-030 $7.46CONDO 098-500-031 $7.46CONDO 098-500-032 $7.46CONDO 098-500-033 $7.46CONDO 098-500-034 $7.46CONDO 098-500-035 $7.46CONDO 098-500-036 $7.46CONDO 098-500-037 $7.46CONDO 098-500-038 $7.46CONDO 098-500-039 $7.46CONDO 098-500-040 $7.46CONDO 098-500-041 $7.46CONDO 098-500-042 $7.46CONDO 098-500-043 $7.46CONDO 098-500-044 $7.46CONDO 098-500-045 $7.46CONDO 098-500-046 $7.46CONDO 098-500-047 $7.46CONDO 098-500-048 $7.46CONDO 098-500-049 $7.46CONDO 098-500-050 $7.46CONDO 098-500-051 $7.46CONDO 098-500-052 $7.46CONDO 098-500-053 $14.94SFR 098-510-001 $7.46CONDO 098-510-002 $7.46CONDO 098-510-003 $7.46CONDO 098-510-004 $7.46CONDO 098-510-005 $7.46CONDO 098-510-006 $7.46CONDO 098-510-007 $7.46CONDO 098-510-008 $7.46CONDO 098-510-009 $7.46CONDO 098-510-010 $7.46CONDO 098-510-011 $7.46CONDO 098-510-012 $7.46CONDO 098-510-013 $7.46CONDO 098-510-014 $7.46CONDO 098-510-015 $7.46CONDO 098-510-016 $7.46CONDO 098-510-017 $7.46CONDO 098-510-018 $7.46CONDO 098-510-019 $7.46CONDO 098-510-020 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-510-021 $7.46CONDO 098-510-022 $7.46CONDO 098-510-023 $7.46CONDO 098-510-024 $7.46CONDO 098-510-025 $7.46CONDO 098-510-026 $7.46CONDO 098-510-027 $7.46CONDO 098-510-028 $7.46CONDO 098-510-029 $7.46CONDO 098-510-030 $7.46CONDO 098-510-031 $7.46CONDO 098-510-032 $7.46CONDO 098-510-033 $7.46CONDO 098-510-034 $7.46CONDO 098-510-035 $7.46CONDO 098-510-036 $7.46CONDO 098-510-037 $7.46CONDO 098-510-038 $7.46CONDO 098-510-039 $7.46CONDO 098-510-040 $7.46CONDO 098-510-041 $7.46CONDO 098-510-042 $7.46CONDO 098-510-043 $7.46CONDO 098-510-044 $7.46CONDO 098-510-045 $7.46CONDO 098-510-046 $7.46CONDO 098-510-047 $7.46CONDO 098-510-048 $7.46CONDO 098-510-049 $7.46CONDO 098-510-050 $7.46CONDO 098-510-051 $7.46CONDO 098-510-052 $7.46CONDO 098-510-053 $7.46CONDO 098-510-054 $7.46CONDO 098-510-055 $7.46CONDO 098-510-056 $7.46CONDO 098-510-057 $7.46CONDO 098-510-058 $7.46CONDO 098-510-059 $7.46CONDO 098-510-060 $7.46CONDO 098-510-061 $7.46CONDO 098-510-062 $7.46CONDO 098-510-063 $7.46CONDO 098-510-064 $7.46CONDO 098-510-065 $7.46CONDO 098-510-066 $7.46CONDO 098-510-067 $7.46CONDO 098-510-068 $7.46CONDO 098-510-069 $7.46CONDO 098-510-070 $7.46CONDO 098-510-071 $7.46CONDO 098-510-072 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-510-073 $7.46CONDO 098-510-074 $7.46CONDO 098-510-075 $7.46CONDO 098-510-076 $7.46CONDO 098-541-001 $14.94SFR 098-541-002 $14.94SFR 098-541-003 $14.94SFR 098-541-004 $14.94SFR 098-541-005 $14.94SFR 098-541-006 $14.94SFR 098-541-007 $14.94SFR 098-541-008 $14.94SFR 098-541-009 $14.94SFR 098-541-010 $14.94SFR 098-541-011 $14.94SFR 098-541-012 $14.94SFR 098-541-013 $14.94SFR 098-541-014 $14.94SFR 098-541-015 $14.94SFR 098-541-016 $14.94SFR 098-541-017 $14.94SFR 098-541-018 $14.94SFR 098-541-019 $14.94SFR 098-541-020 $14.94SFR 098-541-021 $14.94SFR 098-541-022 $14.94SFR 098-541-023 $14.94SFR 098-541-024 $14.94SFR 098-541-025 $14.94SFR 098-541-026 $14.94SFR 098-541-027 $14.94SFR 098-541-028 $14.94SFR 098-541-029 $14.94SFR 098-541-030 $14.94SFR 098-541-031 $14.94SFR 098-541-032 $14.94SFR 098-541-033 $14.94SFR 098-541-034 $14.94SFR 098-541-035 $14.94SFR 098-541-036 $14.94SFR 098-541-037 $14.94SFR 098-541-038 $14.94SFR 098-541-039 $14.94SFR 098-542-001 $14.94SFR 098-542-002 $14.94SFR 098-542-003 $14.94SFR 098-542-004 $14.94SFR 098-542-005 $14.94SFR 098-542-006 $14.94SFR 098-542-007 $14.94SFR 098-542-008 $14.94SFR 098-542-009 $14.94SFR - 68 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-542-010 $14.94SFR 098-542-011 $14.94SFR 098-542-012 $14.94SFR 098-542-013 $14.94SFR 098-542-014 $14.94SFR 098-542-015 $14.94SFR 098-542-016 $14.94SFR 098-542-017 $14.94SFR 098-542-018 $14.94SFR 098-542-019 $14.94SFR 098-542-020 $14.94SFR 098-542-021 $14.94SFR 098-542-022 $14.94SFR 098-542-023 $14.94SFR 098-542-024 $14.94SFR 098-542-025 $14.94SFR 098-542-026 $14.94SFR 098-542-029 $14.94SFR 098-542-030 $14.94SFR 098-542-031 $14.94SFR 098-542-032 $14.94SFR 098-542-033 $14.94SFR 098-551-001 $14.94SFR 098-551-002 $14.94SFR 098-551-003 $14.94SFR 098-551-004 $14.94SFR 098-551-005 $14.94SFR 098-551-006 $14.94SFR 098-551-007 $14.94SFR 098-551-008 $14.94SFR 098-551-009 $14.94SFR 098-551-010 $14.94SFR 098-551-011 $14.94SFR 098-551-012 $14.94SFR 098-551-013 $14.94SFR 098-551-014 $14.94SFR 098-551-015 $14.94SFR 098-551-016 $14.94SFR 098-551-017 $14.94SFR 098-552-001 $14.94SFR 098-552-002 $14.94SFR 098-552-003 $14.94SFR 098-552-004 $14.94SFR 098-552-005 $14.94SFR 098-552-006 $14.94SFR 098-552-007 $14.94SFR 098-552-008 $14.94SFR 098-552-009 $14.94SFR 098-552-010 $14.94SFR 098-552-011 $14.94SFR 098-552-012 $14.94SFR 098-552-013 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-552-014 $14.94SFR 098-552-015 $14.94SFR 098-552-016 $14.94SFR 098-552-017 $14.94SFR 098-552-018 $14.94SFR 098-552-019 $14.94SFR 098-552-020 $14.94SFR 098-552-021 $14.94SFR 098-552-022 $14.94SFR 098-552-023 $14.94SFR 098-552-024 $14.94SFR 098-552-025 $14.94SFR 098-552-026 $14.94SFR 098-552-027 $14.94SFR 098-552-028 $14.94SFR 098-552-029 $14.94SFR 098-552-030 $14.94SFR 098-552-031 $14.94SFR 098-552-032 $14.94SFR 098-552-033 $14.94SFR 098-552-034 $14.94SFR 098-552-035 $14.94SFR 098-552-036 $14.94SFR 098-552-037 $14.94SFR 098-552-038 $14.94SFR 098-552-039 $14.94SFR 098-552-040 $14.94SFR 098-552-041 $14.94SFR 098-552-042 $14.94SFR 098-552-043 $14.94SFR 098-552-044 $14.94SFR 098-552-045 $14.94SFR 098-552-046 $14.94SFR 098-552-047 $14.94SFR 098-552-048 $14.94SFR 098-552-049 $14.94SFR 098-552-050 $14.94SFR 098-560-001 $14.94SFR 098-560-002 $14.94SFR 098-560-003 $14.94SFR 098-560-004 $14.94SFR 098-560-005 $14.94SFR 098-560-006 $14.94SFR 098-560-007 $14.94SFR 098-560-008 $14.94SFR 098-560-009 $14.94SFR 098-560-010 $14.94SFR 098-560-011 $14.94SFR 098-560-012 $14.94SFR 098-560-013 $14.94SFR 098-560-014 $14.94SFR 098-560-015 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-560-016 $14.94SFR 098-560-017 $14.94SFR 098-560-018 $14.94SFR 098-560-019 $14.94SFR 098-560-020 $14.94SFR 098-560-021 $14.94SFR 098-560-022 $14.94SFR 098-560-023 $14.94SFR 098-560-024 $14.94SFR 098-560-025 $14.94SFR 098-560-026 $14.94SFR 098-560-027 $14.94SFR 098-560-028 $14.94SFR 098-570-001 $14.94SFR 098-570-002 $14.94SFR 098-570-003 $14.94SFR 098-570-004 $14.94SFR 098-570-005 $14.94SFR 098-570-006 $14.94SFR 098-570-007 $14.94SFR 098-570-008 $14.94SFR 098-570-009 $14.94SFR 098-580-001 $14.94SFR 098-580-002 $14.94SFR 098-580-003 $14.94SFR 098-580-004 $14.94SFR 098-580-005 $14.94SFR 098-580-006 $14.94SFR 098-580-007 $14.94SFR 098-580-008 $14.94SFR 098-580-009 $14.94SFR 098-580-010 $14.94SFR 098-580-011 $14.94SFR 098-580-012 $14.94SFR 098-580-013 $14.94SFR 098-580-014 $14.94SFR 098-580-015 $14.94SFR 098-580-016 $14.94SFR 098-580-017 $14.94SFR 098-590-001 $14.94SFR 098-590-002 $14.94SFR 098-590-003 $14.94SFR 098-590-004 $14.94SFR 098-590-005 $14.94SFR 098-590-006 $14.94SFR 098-590-007 $14.94SFR 098-590-008 $14.94SFR 098-590-009 $14.94SFR 098-590-010 $14.94SFR 098-590-011 $14.94SFR 098-590-012 $14.94SFR 098-590-013 $14.94SFR - 69 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 098-590-014 $14.94SFR 098-590-015 $14.94SFR 098-590-016 $14.94SFR 098-590-017 $14.94SFR 098-590-018 $14.94SFR 098-590-019 $14.94SFR 098-590-020 $14.94SFR 098-590-021 $14.94SFR 098-590-022 $14.94SFR 098-590-023 $14.94SFR 098-590-024 $14.94SFR 098-590-025 $14.94SFR 098-590-026 $14.94SFR 098-590-027 $14.94SFR 098-590-028 $14.94SFR 098-590-029 $14.94SFR 098-590-030 $14.94SFR 098-590-031 $14.94SFR 098-590-032 $14.94SFR 098-590-033 $14.94SFR 098-590-034 $14.94SFR 098-590-035 $14.94SFR 098-590-036 $14.94SFR 098-590-037 $14.94SFR 098-590-038 $14.94SFR 098-590-039 $14.94SFR 098-590-040 $14.94SFR 098-590-041 $14.94SFR 098-590-042 $14.94SFR 098-590-043 $14.94SFR 098-590-044 $14.94SFR 098-590-045 $14.94SFR 098-590-046 $14.94SFR 098-590-047 $14.94SFR 098-590-048 $14.94SFR 098-590-049 $14.94SFR 098-590-050 $14.94SFR 099-040-015 $74.70VIND 099-040-019 $74.70VIND 099-040-020 $74.70IND 099-110-039 $7.46MISC 099-110-040 $7.46MISC 099-130-006 $74.70INST 099-130-010 $7.46MISC 099-130-011 $7.46MISC 099-160-026 $74.70VIND 099-160-027 $74.70VIND 099-170-001 $14.94SFR 099-170-002 $14.94SFR 099-170-003 $14.94SFR 099-170-004 $14.94SFR 099-170-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 099-170-006 $14.94SFR 099-170-007 $14.94SFR 099-170-008 $14.94SFR 099-170-009 $14.94SFR 099-170-010 $14.94SFR 099-170-011 $14.94SFR 099-170-012 $14.94SFR 099-170-013 $14.94SFR 099-170-014 $14.94SFR 099-170-015 $14.94SFR 099-170-016 $14.94SFR 099-170-017 $14.94SFR 099-170-018 $14.94SFR 099-170-019 $14.94SFR 099-170-020 $14.94SFR 099-170-021 $14.94SFR 099-170-022 $14.94SFR 099-170-023 $14.94SFR 099-170-024 $14.94SFR 099-170-025 $14.94SFR 099-170-026 $14.94SFR 099-170-027 $14.94SFR 099-170-028 $14.94SFR 099-170-029 $14.94SFR 099-170-030 $14.94SFR 099-170-031 $14.94SFR 099-170-032 $14.94SFR 099-170-033 $14.94SFR 099-170-034 $14.94SFR 099-170-035 $14.94SFR 099-170-036 $14.94SFR 099-170-037 $14.94SFR 099-170-038 $14.94SFR 099-170-039 $14.94SFR 099-170-040 $14.94SFR 099-170-041 $14.94SFR 099-170-042 $14.94SFR 099-170-043 $14.94SFR 099-170-044 $14.94SFR 099-170-045 $14.94SFR 099-170-046 $14.94SFR 099-170-047 $14.94SFR 099-170-048 $14.94SFR 099-170-049 $14.94SFR 099-170-050 $14.94SFR 099-170-051 $14.94SFR 099-170-052 $14.94SFR 099-170-053 $14.94SFR 099-170-054 $14.94SFR 099-170-055 $14.94SFR 099-170-056 $14.94SFR 099-170-057 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 099-170-058 $14.94SFR 099-170-059 $14.94SFR 099-170-060 $14.94SFR 099-170-061 $14.94SFR 099-170-062 $14.94SFR 099-170-063 $14.94SFR 099-170-066 $14.94SFR 099-170-067 $14.94SFR 099-170-068 $14.94SFR 099-170-069 $14.94SFR 099-170-070 $14.94SFR 099-170-071 $14.94SFR 099-170-072 $14.94SFR 099-170-073 $14.94SFR 099-170-074 $14.94SFR 099-170-075 $14.94SFR 099-170-076 $14.94SFR 099-180-001 $14.94SFR 099-180-002 $14.94SFR 099-180-003 $14.94SFR 099-180-004 $14.94SFR 099-180-005 $14.94SFR 099-180-006 $14.94SFR 099-180-007 $14.94SFR 099-180-008 $14.94SFR 099-180-009 $14.94SFR 099-180-010 $14.94SFR 099-180-011 $14.94SFR 099-180-012 $14.94SFR 099-180-013 $14.94SFR 099-180-014 $14.94SFR 099-180-015 $14.94SFR 099-180-016 $14.94SFR 099-180-017 $14.94SFR 099-180-018 $14.94SFR 099-180-019 $14.94SFR 099-180-020 $14.94SFR 099-180-021 $14.94SFR 099-180-022 $14.94SFR 099-180-023 $14.94SFR 099-180-024 $14.94SFR 099-180-025 $14.94SFR 099-180-026 $14.94SFR 099-180-027 $14.94SFR 099-180-028 $14.94SFR 099-180-029 $14.94SFR 099-180-030 $14.94SFR 099-180-031 $14.94SFR 099-180-032 $14.94SFR 099-180-033 $14.94SFR 099-180-034 $14.94SFR 099-180-035 $14.94SFR - 70 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 099-180-036 $14.94SFR 099-180-037 $14.94SFR 099-180-038 $14.94SFR 099-180-039 $14.94SFR 099-180-040 $14.94SFR 099-180-041 $14.94SFR 099-180-042 $14.94SFR 099-180-043 $14.94SFR 099-180-044 $14.94SFR 099-180-045 $14.94SFR 099-180-046 $14.94SFR 099-180-047 $14.94SFR 099-180-048 $14.94SFR 099-180-049 $14.94SFR 099-180-050 $14.94SFR 099-180-051 $14.94SFR 099-180-052 $14.94SFR 099-180-053 $14.94SFR 099-180-054 $14.94SFR 099-180-055 $14.94SFR 099-180-056 $14.94SFR 099-180-057 $14.94SFR 099-180-058 $14.94SFR 099-180-059 $14.94SFR 099-180-060 $14.94SFR 099-180-061 $14.94SFR 099-180-062 $14.94SFR 099-180-063 $14.94SFR 099-180-064 $14.94SFR 099-180-065 $14.94SFR 099-180-066 $14.94SFR 099-180-067 $14.94SFR 099-180-068 $14.94SFR 099-180-069 $14.94SFR 099-180-070 $14.94SFR 099-180-071 $14.94SFR 099-180-072 $14.94SFR 099-180-073 $14.94SFR 099-180-074 $14.94SFR 099-180-075 $14.94SFR 099-180-076 $14.94SFR 099-180-077 $14.94SFR 099-180-078 $14.94SFR 099-180-079 $14.94SFR 099-180-080 $14.94SFR 099-180-081 $14.94SFR 099-180-082 $14.94SFR 099-180-083 $14.94SFR 099-180-084 $14.94SFR 099-180-085 $14.94SFR 099-180-086 $14.94SFR 099-180-087 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 099-180-088 $14.94SFR 099-180-089 $14.94SFR 099-180-090 $14.94SFR 099-180-091 $14.94SFR 099-180-092 $14.94SFR 099-180-093 $14.94SFR 099-180-094 $14.94SFR 099-190-001 $14.94SFR 099-190-002 $14.94SFR 099-190-003 $14.94SFR 099-190-004 $14.94SFR 099-190-005 $14.94SFR 099-190-006 $14.94SFR 099-190-007 $14.94SFR 099-190-008 $14.94SFR 099-190-009 $14.94SFR 099-190-010 $14.94SFR 099-190-011 $14.94SFR 099-190-012 $14.94SFR 099-190-013 $14.94SFR 099-190-014 $14.94SFR 099-190-015 $14.94SFR 099-190-016 $14.94SFR 099-190-017 $14.94SFR 099-190-018 $14.94SFR 099-190-019 $14.94SFR 099-190-020 $14.94SFR 099-190-021 $14.94SFR 099-190-022 $14.94SFR 099-190-023 $14.94SFR 099-190-024 $14.94SFR 099-190-025 $14.94SFR 099-190-026 $14.94SFR 099-190-027 $14.94SFR 099-190-028 $14.94SFR 099-190-029 $14.94SFR 099-190-030 $14.94SFR 099-190-031 $14.94SFR 099-190-032 $14.94SFR 099-190-033 $14.94SFR 099-190-034 $14.94SFR 099-190-035 $14.94SFR 099-190-036 $14.94SFR 099-190-037 $14.94SFR 099-190-038 $14.94SFR 099-190-039 $14.94SFR 099-190-040 $14.94SFR 099-190-041 $14.94SFR 099-190-042 $14.94SFR 099-190-043 $14.94SFR 099-190-044 $14.94SFR 099-190-045 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 099-190-046 $14.94SFR 099-190-047 $14.94SFR 099-190-048 $14.94SFR 099-190-049 $14.94SFR 099-190-050 $14.94SFR 099-190-051 $14.94SFR 099-190-052 $14.94SFR 099-190-053 $14.94SFR 099-190-054 $14.94SFR 099-190-055 $14.94SFR 099-190-056 $14.94SFR 099-190-057 $14.94SFR 099-190-058 $14.94SFR 099-190-059 $14.94SFR 099-190-060 $14.94SFR 099-190-061 $14.94SFR 099-190-062 $14.94SFR 099-190-063 $14.94SFR 099-190-064 $14.94SFR 099-190-065 $14.94SFR 099-190-066 $14.94SFR 099-190-067 $14.94SFR 099-190-068 $14.94SFR 099-190-069 $14.94SFR 099-190-070 $14.94SFR 099-190-071 $14.94SFR 099-190-072 $14.94SFR 099-190-073 $14.94SFR 099-190-074 $14.94SFR 099-190-075 $14.94SFR 099-190-076 $14.94SFR 099-190-077 $14.94SFR 099-190-078 $14.94SFR 099-190-079 $14.94SFR 099-190-080 $14.94SFR 099-190-081 $14.94SFR 099-190-082 $14.94SFR 099-190-083 $14.94SFR 099-190-084 $14.94SFR 099-190-085 $14.94SFR 099-190-086 $14.94SFR 099-190-087 $14.94SFR 099-190-088 $14.94SFR 099-190-089 $14.94SFR 099-190-090 $14.94SFR 099-190-091 $14.94SFR 099-190-092 $14.94SFR 099-190-093 $14.94SFR 099-190-094 $14.94SFR 099-190-095 $14.94SFR 099-190-096 $14.94SFR 099-190-097 $14.94SFR - 71 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 099-190-098 $14.94SFR 099-190-099 $14.94SFR 099-190-100 $14.94SFR 099-190-101 $14.94SFR 099-190-102 $14.94SFR 099-190-103 $14.94SFR 099-190-104 $14.94SFR 099-190-105 $14.94SFR 099-190-106 $14.94SFR 099-190-107 $14.94SFR 099-190-108 $14.94SFR 099-190-109 $14.94SFR 099-190-110 $14.94SFR 099-190-111 $14.94SFR 099-190-112 $14.94SFR 099-190-113 $14.94SFR 099-190-114 $14.94SFR 099-190-115 $14.94SFR 099-190-116 $14.94SFR 099-190-117 $14.94SFR 099-190-118 $14.94SFR 099-190-119 $14.94SFR 099-190-120 $14.94SFR 099-190-121 $14.94SFR 099-190-122 $14.94SFR 099-190-123 $14.94SFR 099-190-124 $14.94SFR 099-190-125 $14.94SFR 099-190-126 $14.94SFR 099-190-127 $14.94SFR 099-190-128 $14.94SFR 099-190-129 $14.94SFR 099-200-001 $14.94SFR 099-200-002 $14.94SFR 099-200-003 $14.94SFR 099-200-004 $14.94SFR 099-200-005 $14.94SFR 099-200-006 $14.94SFR 099-200-007 $14.94SFR 099-200-008 $14.94SFR 099-200-009 $14.94SFR 099-200-010 $14.94SFR 099-200-011 $14.94SFR 099-200-012 $14.94SFR 099-200-013 $14.94SFR 099-200-014 $14.94SFR 099-200-015 $14.94SFR 099-200-016 $14.94SFR 099-200-017 $14.94SFR 099-200-018 $14.94SFR 099-200-019 $14.94SFR 099-200-020 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 099-200-021 $14.94SFR 099-200-022 $14.94SFR 099-200-023 $14.94SFR 099-200-024 $14.94SFR 099-200-025 $14.94SFR 099-200-026 $14.94SFR 099-200-027 $14.94SFR 099-200-028 $14.94SFR 099-200-029 $14.94SFR 099-200-030 $14.94SFR 099-200-031 $14.94SFR 099-200-032 $14.94SFR 099-200-033 $14.94SFR 099-200-034 $14.94SFR 099-200-035 $14.94SFR 099-200-036 $14.94SFR 099-200-037 $14.94SFR 099-200-038 $14.94SFR 099-200-039 $14.94SFR 099-200-040 $14.94SFR 099-200-041 $14.94SFR 099-200-043 $14.94SFR 099-200-044 $14.94SFR 099-200-045 $14.94SFR 099-200-046 $14.94SFR 099-200-047 $14.94SFR 099-210-002 $74.70IND 099-210-005 $74.70IND 099-210-006 $74.70IND 099-210-007 $74.70IND 099-210-010 $74.70VIND 099-210-011 $74.70VIND 099-210-016 $74.70VIND 099-210-017 $74.70VIND 099-210-018 $74.70VIND 099-210-021 $74.70IND 099-210-022 $74.70COM 099-210-023 $74.70COM 099-210-024 $74.70IND 099-210-027 $74.70VIND 099-210-028 $74.70VIND 099-210-030 $74.70IND 099-210-031 $74.70IND 099-220-001 $7.46CONDO 099-220-002 $7.46CONDO 099-220-004 $7.46CONDO 099-220-005 $7.46CONDO 099-220-008 $7.46CONDO 099-220-009 $7.46CONDO 099-220-010 $7.46CONDO 099-220-012 $7.46CONDO 099-220-013 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 099-220-014 $7.46CONDO 099-220-015 $7.46CONDO 100-291-017 $14.94SFR 100-291-018 $14.94SFR 100-291-019 $14.94SFR 100-291-020 $14.94SFR 100-291-021 $14.94SFR 100-291-022 $14.94SFR 100-291-023 $14.94SFR 100-291-024 $14.94SFR 100-291-025 $14.94SFR 100-291-026 $14.94SFR 100-292-017 $14.94SFR 100-292-018 $14.94SFR 100-292-019 $14.94SFR 100-292-020 $14.94SFR 100-292-021 $14.94SFR 100-292-022 $14.94SFR 100-292-023 $14.94SFR 100-292-024 $14.94SFR 100-292-025 $14.94SFR 100-292-026 $14.94SFR 100-292-027 $14.94SFR 100-293-001 $14.94SFR 100-293-002 $7.46VSFR 100-293-003 $29.88MFR2 100-293-005 $14.94SFR 100-293-006 $14.94SFR 100-293-007 $14.94SFR 100-293-008 $14.94SFR 100-293-009 $14.94SFR 100-293-013 $14.94SFR 100-293-015 $7.46VSFR 100-293-016 $14.94SFR 100-293-017 $14.94SFR 100-293-018 $14.94SFR 100-301-019 $14.94SFR 100-301-020 $14.94SFR 100-301-021 $14.94SFR 100-301-022 $14.94SFR 100-301-023 $14.94SFR 100-301-024 $14.94SFR 100-301-025 $14.94SFR 100-301-026 $14.94SFR 100-301-027 $14.94SFR 100-301-028 $14.94SFR 100-301-029 $14.94SFR 100-301-030 $14.94SFR 100-301-031 $14.94SFR 100-301-032 $14.94SFR 100-301-033 $14.94SFR 100-301-034 $14.94SFR - 72 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 100-301-035 $14.94SFR 100-302-018 $14.94SFR 100-302-019 $14.94SFR 100-302-020 $14.94SFR 100-302-021 $14.94SFR 100-302-022 $14.94SFR 100-302-023 $14.94SFR 100-302-024 $14.94SFR 100-302-025 $14.94SFR 100-302-026 $14.94SFR 100-302-027 $14.94SFR 100-302-028 $14.94SFR 100-302-029 $14.94SFR 100-302-030 $14.94SFR 100-302-031 $14.94SFR 100-302-032 $14.94SFR 100-302-033 $14.94SFR 100-302-034 $14.94SFR 100-303-002 $14.94SFR 100-303-003 $14.94SFR 100-303-004 $14.94SFR 100-303-005 $14.94SFR 100-303-006 $14.94SFR 100-303-007 $14.94SFR 100-303-008 $7.46VSFR 100-303-009 $14.94SFR 100-303-010 $14.94SFR 100-303-011 $14.94SFR 100-303-012 $14.94SFR 100-303-013 $14.94SFR 100-303-014 $14.94SFR 100-303-015 $14.94SFR 100-303-016 $14.94SFR 100-303-019 $14.94SFR 100-304-002 $14.94SFR 100-304-007 $14.94SFR 100-304-008 $14.94SFR 100-311-025 $14.94SFR 100-311-028 $14.94SFR 100-311-029 $14.94SFR 100-311-030 $14.94SFR 100-311-031 $14.94SFR 100-311-032 $14.94SFR 100-311-033 $14.94SFR 100-311-034 $14.94SFR 100-311-035 $14.94SFR 100-311-036 $14.94SFR 100-311-037 $14.94SFR 100-311-038 $14.94SFR 100-311-039 $14.94SFR 100-311-040 $14.94SFR 100-311-041 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 100-311-042 $14.94SFR 100-311-043 $14.94SFR 100-311-044 $14.94SFR 100-311-045 $14.94SFR 100-311-046 $14.94SFR 100-312-024 $14.94SFR 100-312-025 $14.94SFR 100-312-026 $14.94SFR 100-312-027 $14.94SFR 100-312-028 $14.94SFR 100-312-029 $14.94SFR 100-312-030 $14.94SFR 100-312-031 $14.94SFR 100-312-032 $14.94SFR 100-312-033 $14.94SFR 100-312-034 $14.94SFR 100-312-035 $14.94SFR 100-312-036 $14.94SFR 100-312-037 $14.94SFR 100-312-038 $14.94SFR 100-312-039 $74.70COM 100-313-015 $14.94SFR 100-313-018 $14.94SFR 100-313-020 $14.94SFR 100-313-021 $14.94SFR 100-313-025 $14.94SFR 100-313-028 $14.94SFR 100-313-029 $14.94SFR 100-313-032 $14.94SFR 100-313-034 $14.94SFR 100-313-041 $14.94SFR 100-313-043 $14.94SFR 100-313-045 $14.94SFR 100-313-046 $14.94SFR 100-313-047 $14.94SFR 100-313-048 $14.94SFR 100-313-049 $14.94SFR 100-313-050 $14.94SFR 100-314-004 $14.94SFR 100-314-005 $14.94SFR 100-321-016 $14.94SFR 100-321-025 $14.94SFR 100-321-027 $14.94SFR 100-321-028 $14.94SFR 100-321-029 $74.70IND 100-321-038 $74.70VIND 100-321-039 $74.70IND 100-321-040 $74.70MFR5 100-321-041 $74.70IND 100-321-045 $14.94SFR 100-321-047 $14.94SFR 100-321-048 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 100-321-049 $14.94SFR 100-321-050 $14.94SFR 100-321-051 $14.94SFR 100-321-052 $14.94SFR 100-321-054 $74.70IND 100-321-056 $74.70VIND 100-321-057 $7.46VSFR 100-401-011 $14.94SFR 100-401-012 $29.88MFR2 100-401-013 $14.94SFR 100-401-014 $14.94SFR 100-401-015 $14.94SFR 100-401-017 $7.46VSFR 100-401-024 $14.94SFR 100-401-025 $14.94SFR 100-401-026 $14.94SFR 100-401-027 $14.94SFR 100-401-028 $14.94SFR 100-401-029 $14.94SFR 100-401-030 $14.94SFR 100-401-031 $14.94SFR 100-401-032 $14.94SFR 100-401-033 $14.94SFR 100-401-034 $14.94SFR 100-401-035 $14.94SFR 100-401-036 $14.94SFR 100-401-037 $14.94SFR 100-401-038 $14.94SFR 100-401-039 $14.94SFR 100-401-040 $14.94SFR 100-401-041 $14.94SFR 100-401-042 $14.94SFR 100-401-043 $14.94SFR 100-401-044 $14.94SFR 100-401-045 $14.94SFR 100-401-046 $14.94SFR 100-410-004 $14.94SFR 100-410-005 $14.94SFR 100-410-006 $14.94SFR 100-410-007 $14.94SFR 100-410-008 $14.94SFR 100-410-009 $14.94SFR 100-410-010 $14.94SFR 100-410-011 $14.94SFR 100-410-012 $14.94SFR 100-410-013 $14.94SFR 100-410-014 $14.94SFR 100-410-015 $14.94SFR 100-410-016 $14.94SFR 100-410-017 $14.94SFR 100-410-018 $14.94SFR 100-410-019 $14.94SFR - 73 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 100-410-020 $14.94SFR 100-410-021 $14.94SFR 100-410-022 $14.94SFR 100-410-023 $14.94SFR 100-410-024 $14.94SFR 100-410-025 $14.94SFR 100-410-026 $14.94SFR 100-410-027 $14.94SFR 100-410-028 $14.94SFR 100-410-029 $14.94SFR 100-410-030 $14.94SFR 100-410-031 $14.94SFR 100-411-001 $14.94SFR 100-411-002 $14.94SFR 100-411-003 $14.94SFR 100-411-004 $14.94SFR 100-411-005 $14.94SFR 100-411-006 $14.94SFR 100-411-007 $14.94SFR 100-411-008 $14.94SFR 100-411-009 $14.94SFR 100-411-010 $14.94SFR 100-411-011 $14.94SFR 100-411-012 $14.94SFR 100-411-013 $14.94SFR 100-411-014 $14.94SFR 100-411-015 $14.94SFR 100-411-016 $14.94SFR 100-412-001 $14.94SFR 100-412-002 $14.94SFR 100-412-003 $14.94SFR 100-412-004 $14.94SFR 100-412-005 $14.94SFR 100-412-006 $14.94SFR 100-412-007 $14.94SFR 100-412-008 $14.94SFR 100-412-009 $14.94SFR 100-412-010 $14.94SFR 100-412-011 $14.94SFR 100-412-012 $14.94SFR 100-412-013 $14.94SFR 100-412-014 $14.94SFR 100-412-016 $14.94SFR 100-412-017 $14.94SFR 100-412-018 $14.94SFR 100-412-019 $14.94SFR 100-412-020 $14.94SFR 100-412-021 $14.94SFR 100-420-001 $14.94SFR 100-420-002 $14.94SFR 100-420-003 $14.94SFR 100-420-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 100-420-005 $14.94SFR 100-420-006 $14.94SFR 100-420-007 $14.94SFR 100-420-008 $14.94SFR 100-420-009 $14.94SFR 100-420-010 $14.94SFR 100-420-011 $14.94SFR 100-420-012 $14.94SFR 100-420-013 $14.94SFR 100-420-014 $14.94SFR 100-420-015 $14.94SFR 100-420-018 $14.94SFR 100-420-019 $14.94SFR 100-420-020 $14.94SFR 100-430-001 $14.94SFR 100-430-002 $14.94SFR 100-430-003 $14.94SFR 100-430-007 $14.94SFR 100-430-008 $14.94SFR 100-430-009 $14.94SFR 100-430-010 $14.94SFR 100-430-011 $14.94SFR 100-430-012 $14.94SFR 100-430-014 $14.94SFR 100-430-015 $14.94SFR 100-430-016 $14.94SFR 100-430-017 $14.94SFR 116-110-038 $14.94SFR 116-130-053 $14.94SFR 116-130-054 $14.94SFR 116-130-055 $14.94SFR 116-270-003 $14.94SFR 116-270-004 $14.94SFR 116-270-005 $14.94SFR 116-270-006 $14.94SFR 116-270-007 $14.94SFR 116-270-008 $14.94SFR 116-270-009 $14.94SFR 116-270-010 $14.94SFR 116-270-011 $14.94SFR 116-270-012 $14.94SFR 116-270-013 $14.94SFR 116-270-014 $14.94SFR 116-270-015 $14.94SFR 116-270-019 $14.94SFR 116-270-029 $14.94SFR 117-030-058 $14.94SFR 117-030-059 $14.94SFR 117-030-060 $14.94SFR 117-030-061 $14.94SFR 117-030-062 $14.94SFR 117-030-063 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 117-030-064 $14.94SFR 117-030-065 $14.94SFR 117-030-066 $14.94SFR 117-030-067 $14.94SFR 117-030-068 $14.94SFR 117-040-013 $14.94SFR 119-181-002 $14.94SFR 119-181-003 $14.94SFR 119-181-004 $14.94SFR 119-181-007 $14.94SFR 119-181-008 $14.94SFR 119-181-009 $14.94SFR 119-181-010 $14.94SFR 119-181-011 $14.94SFR 119-181-012 $14.94SFR 119-182-001 $14.94SFR 119-190-001 $14.94SFR 119-190-002 $14.94SFR 119-190-003 $14.94SFR 119-190-004 $14.94SFR 119-190-005 $14.94SFR 119-190-006 $14.94SFR 119-190-007 $14.94SFR 119-250-001 $14.94SFR 119-250-002 $14.94SFR 119-250-003 $14.94SFR 119-250-004 $14.94SFR 119-250-005 $14.94SFR 119-250-006 $14.94SFR 119-250-007 $14.94SFR 119-250-008 $14.94SFR 119-500-002 $14.94SFR 119-500-003 $14.94SFR 119-500-004 $14.94SFR 119-500-005 $14.94SFR 119-500-006 $14.94SFR 119-500-007 $14.94SFR 119-500-008 $14.94SFR 119-500-009 $14.94SFR 119-500-010 $14.94SFR 119-500-011 $14.94SFR 119-500-012 $14.94SFR 125-020-045 $74.70COM 125-020-051 $74.70COM 125-020-058 $74.70COM 125-020-062 $74.70IND 125-020-066 $74.70COM 125-020-070 $74.70IND 125-031-002 $14.94SFR 125-031-003 $14.94SFR 125-031-004 $14.94SFR 125-031-006 $74.70COM - 74 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-031-007 $74.70IND 125-031-010 $74.70IND 125-032-004 $74.70COM 125-032-005 $74.70COM 125-032-006 $14.94SFR 125-032-012 $74.70COM 125-032-030 $74.70COM 125-032-031 $74.70COM 125-032-032 $74.70COM 125-032-033 $7.46VCOM 125-032-035 $74.70COM 125-041-006 $74.70COM 125-041-008 $74.70IND 125-041-012 $74.70IND 125-041-014 $74.70COM 125-041-016 $74.70IND 125-041-017 $74.70IND 125-041-018 $14.94SFR 125-041-019 $74.70COM 125-041-020 $74.70COM 125-041-021 $74.70VIND 125-041-022 $74.70IND 125-046-001 $74.70COM 125-046-009 $74.70COM 125-046-010 $74.70COM 125-071-005 $14.94SFR 125-071-008 $14.94SFR 125-071-009 $14.94SFR 125-071-010 $14.94SFR 125-071-011 $7.46VSFR 125-071-012 $7.46VSFR 125-072-005 $14.94SFR 125-072-006 $14.94SFR 125-072-007 $14.94SFR 125-072-008 $14.94SFR 125-072-009 $14.94SFR 125-072-010 $14.94SFR 125-072-011 $14.94SFR 125-072-012 $14.94SFR 125-072-013 $14.94SFR 125-072-014 $14.94SFR 125-072-015 $14.94SFR 125-074-004 $14.94SFR 125-074-005 $14.94SFR 125-074-006 $14.94SFR 125-074-009 $14.94SFR 125-074-010 $29.88MFR2 125-074-011 $14.94SFR 125-074-012 $14.94SFR 125-074-013 $14.94SFR 125-074-014 $14.94SFR 125-074-016 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-074-017 $14.94SFR 125-074-018 $14.94SFR 125-075-003 $14.94SFR 125-075-004 $14.94SFR 125-075-005 $14.94SFR 125-075-007 $14.94SFR 125-075-010 $14.94SFR 125-075-011 $14.94SFR 125-075-012 $14.94SFR 125-075-013 $7.46VSFR 125-076-002 $14.94SFR 125-077-018 $74.70COM 125-077-024 $74.70INST 125-077-028 $74.70COM 125-080-007 $14.94SFR 125-080-008 $14.94SFR 125-080-012 $14.94SFR 125-080-019 $14.94SFR 125-080-020 $14.94SFR 125-080-021 $14.94SFR 125-080-035 $14.94SFR 125-080-036 $14.94SFR 125-080-037 $14.94SFR 125-080-038 $14.94SFR 125-080-039 $14.94SFR 125-080-040 $14.94SFR 125-080-041 $14.94SFR 125-080-042 $14.94SFR 125-080-043 $14.94SFR 125-080-044 $14.94SFR 125-080-045 $14.94SFR 125-080-046 $14.94SFR 125-080-047 $14.94SFR 125-080-048 $14.94SFR 125-080-049 $14.94SFR 125-080-050 $14.94SFR 125-080-051 $14.94SFR 125-080-052 $14.94SFR 125-080-053 $14.94SFR 125-080-054 $14.94SFR 125-080-055 $14.94SFR 125-080-056 $14.94SFR 125-080-057 $14.94SFR 125-080-058 $14.94SFR 125-080-059 $14.94SFR 125-080-060 $14.94SFR 125-080-061 $14.94SFR 125-080-062 $14.94SFR 125-080-063 $14.94SFR 125-080-064 $14.94SFR 125-080-065 $14.94SFR 125-080-066 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-080-067 $14.94SFR 125-080-068 $14.94SFR 125-080-069 $14.94SFR 125-080-070 $14.94SFR 125-080-071 $14.94SFR 125-080-072 $14.94SFR 125-080-073 $14.94SFR 125-080-074 $14.94SFR 125-080-075 $14.94SFR 125-080-076 $14.94SFR 125-080-077 $14.94SFR 125-080-078 $14.94SFR 125-080-079 $14.94SFR 125-080-080 $14.94SFR 125-080-081 $14.94SFR 125-080-082 $14.94SFR 125-080-083 $14.94SFR 125-080-084 $14.94SFR 125-080-085 $14.94SFR 125-080-086 $14.94SFR 125-080-087 $14.94SFR 125-080-088 $14.94SFR 125-080-089 $14.94SFR 125-080-090 $14.94SFR 125-080-091 $14.94SFR 125-080-092 $14.94SFR 125-080-093 $14.94SFR 125-080-094 $14.94SFR 125-080-095 $14.94SFR 125-080-096 $14.94SFR 125-080-097 $14.94SFR 125-080-098 $14.94SFR 125-080-099 $14.94SFR 125-080-100 $14.94SFR 125-080-101 $14.94SFR 125-080-102 $14.94SFR 125-080-103 $14.94SFR 125-080-104 $14.94SFR 125-080-105 $14.94SFR 125-080-107 $7.46CONDO 125-080-108 $7.46CONDO 125-080-109 $7.46CONDO 125-080-110 $7.46CONDO 125-080-111 $7.46CONDO 125-080-112 $7.46CONDO 125-080-113 $7.46CONDO 125-080-114 $7.46CONDO 125-080-115 $7.46CONDO 125-080-116 $7.46CONDO 125-080-117 $7.46CONDO 125-080-118 $7.46CONDO 125-080-119 $7.46CONDO - 75 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-080-120 $7.46CONDO 125-080-121 $7.46CONDO 125-080-122 $7.46CONDO 125-090-001 $14.94SFR 125-090-002 $14.94SFR 125-090-003 $14.94SFR 125-090-004 $14.94SFR 125-090-005 $14.94SFR 125-090-006 $14.94SFR 125-090-009 $14.94SFR 125-090-010 $14.94SFR 125-090-032 $14.94SFR 125-090-033 $14.94SFR 125-090-036 $14.94SFR 125-090-037 $14.94SFR 125-090-038 $14.94SFR 125-090-039 $14.94SFR 125-090-067 $29.88MFR2 125-090-068 $14.94SFR 125-090-069 $29.88MFR2 125-090-070 $14.94SFR 125-090-071 $14.94SFR 125-090-072 $14.94SFR 125-091-051 $14.94SFR 125-091-052 $14.94SFR 125-091-053 $14.94SFR 125-091-054 $14.94SFR 125-091-055 $14.94SFR 125-091-056 $14.94SFR 125-091-057 $14.94SFR 125-091-058 $14.94SFR 125-091-059 $14.94SFR 125-091-060 $14.94SFR 125-091-061 $14.94SFR 125-091-062 $14.94SFR 125-091-063 $14.94SFR 125-091-064 $14.94SFR 125-091-065 $14.94SFR 125-091-066 $14.94SFR 125-091-067 $14.94SFR 125-091-068 $14.94SFR 125-091-069 $14.94SFR 125-091-070 $14.94SFR 125-091-071 $14.94SFR 125-091-072 $14.94SFR 125-091-073 $14.94SFR 125-091-074 $14.94SFR 125-091-075 $14.94SFR 125-091-076 $14.94SFR 125-091-077 $14.94SFR 125-091-078 $14.94SFR 125-091-079 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-091-080 $14.94SFR 125-100-009 $14.94SFR 125-100-010 $14.94SFR 125-100-011 $14.94SFR 125-100-012 $14.94SFR 125-100-013 $14.94SFR 125-100-014 $14.94SFR 125-100-015 $14.94SFR 125-100-016 $44.82MFR 125-100-017 $14.94SFR 125-100-018 $7.46VSFR 125-100-021 $14.94SFR 125-100-022 $14.94SFR 125-100-023 $14.94SFR 125-100-026 $7.46VSFR 125-100-027 $14.94SFR 125-100-035 $7.46VSFR 125-100-037 $14.94SFR 125-100-039 $74.70INST 125-111-001 $14.94SFR 125-111-002 $14.94SFR 125-111-003 $14.94SFR 125-111-004 $14.94SFR 125-111-005 $14.94SFR 125-111-006 $14.94SFR 125-111-007 $14.94SFR 125-111-008 $14.94SFR 125-111-009 $14.94SFR 125-111-010 $14.94SFR 125-111-011 $14.94SFR 125-111-012 $14.94SFR 125-111-013 $14.94SFR 125-111-014 $14.94SFR 125-111-015 $14.94SFR 125-111-016 $14.94SFR 125-111-017 $14.94SFR 125-111-018 $14.94SFR 125-111-019 $14.94SFR 125-111-020 $14.94SFR 125-111-021 $14.94SFR 125-111-022 $14.94SFR 125-111-023 $14.94SFR 125-111-024 $14.94SFR 125-111-025 $14.94SFR 125-111-026 $14.94SFR 125-111-027 $14.94SFR 125-111-028 $14.94SFR 125-112-001 $14.94SFR 125-112-002 $14.94SFR 125-112-003 $14.94SFR 125-113-001 $14.94SFR 125-113-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-113-003 $14.94SFR 125-113-004 $14.94SFR 125-113-005 $14.94SFR 125-113-006 $14.94SFR 125-113-007 $14.94SFR 125-113-008 $14.94SFR 125-113-009 $14.94SFR 125-113-010 $14.94SFR 125-114-005 $14.94SFR 125-114-006 $14.94SFR 125-114-007 $14.94SFR 125-114-008 $14.94SFR 125-114-009 $14.94SFR 125-114-010 $14.94SFR 125-114-011 $14.94SFR 125-114-012 $14.94SFR 125-114-013 $14.94SFR 125-114-014 $14.94SFR 125-114-015 $14.94SFR 125-114-016 $14.94SFR 125-114-017 $14.94SFR 125-114-019 $14.94SFR 125-114-020 $14.94SFR 125-114-021 $14.94SFR 125-114-022 $14.94SFR 125-115-002 $14.94SFR 125-115-003 $14.94SFR 125-115-004 $14.94SFR 125-115-005 $14.94SFR 125-115-006 $14.94SFR 125-115-007 $14.94SFR 125-115-008 $14.94SFR 125-115-009 $14.94SFR 125-115-010 $14.94SFR 125-120-003 $14.94SFR 125-120-007 $14.94SFR 125-120-010 $14.94SFR 125-120-012 $14.94SFR 125-120-014 $14.94SFR 125-120-015 $14.94SFR 125-120-017 $7.46VCOM 125-120-021 $59.76MFR4 125-120-025 $14.94SFR 125-120-026 $14.94SFR 125-120-034 $14.94SFR 125-120-037 $14.94SFR 125-120-038 $14.94SFR 125-120-039 $14.94SFR 125-120-040 $14.94SFR 125-120-041 $14.94SFR 125-120-042 $14.94SFR 125-120-045 $14.94SFR - 76 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-120-046 $14.94SFR 125-120-047 $14.94SFR 125-120-048 $14.94SFR 125-120-049 $14.94SFR 125-120-050 $14.94SFR 125-120-051 $14.94SFR 125-120-052 $14.94SFR 125-120-053 $14.94SFR 125-120-054 $14.94SFR 125-120-055 $14.94SFR 125-120-056 $14.94SFR 125-120-057 $14.94SFR 125-120-058 $14.94SFR 125-120-063 $14.94SFR 125-120-064 $14.94SFR 125-120-065 $14.94SFR 125-120-066 $14.94SFR 125-120-067 $14.94SFR 125-120-068 $14.94SFR 125-120-069 $14.94SFR 125-120-070 $14.94SFR 125-120-071 $14.94SFR 125-120-072 $14.94SFR 125-120-073 $29.88MFR2 125-120-074 $14.94SFR 125-120-075 $14.94SFR 125-120-076 $14.94SFR 125-120-078 $14.94SFR 125-120-079 $14.94SFR 125-120-083 $14.94SFR 125-120-085 $14.94SFR 125-120-086 $14.94SFR 125-120-091 $14.94SFR 125-120-092 $14.94SFR 125-120-093 $14.94SFR 125-120-095 $14.94SFR 125-120-096 $14.94SFR 125-120-097 $14.94SFR 125-120-098 $14.94SFR 125-120-099 $14.94SFR 125-120-100 $74.70COM 125-120-105 $7.46VCOM 125-120-109 $74.70MFR5 125-120-110 $74.70INST 125-120-111 $74.70INST 125-120-112 $104.58MFR7 125-120-113 $7.46CONDO 125-120-114 $7.46CONDO 125-120-115 $7.46CONDO 125-120-116 $7.46CONDO 125-130-021 $74.70COM 125-140-005 $7.46VCOM Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-140-006 $74.70MFR5 125-140-007 $74.70COM 125-140-008 $74.70COM 125-140-010 $14.94SFR 125-140-011 $14.94SFR 125-140-012 $14.94SFR 125-140-013 $14.94SFR 125-140-014 $14.94SFR 125-140-015 $14.94SFR 125-140-016 $14.94SFR 125-140-017 $14.94SFR 125-140-018 $14.94SFR 125-140-019 $14.94SFR 125-140-020 $14.94SFR 125-140-021 $14.94SFR 125-140-022 $14.94SFR 125-140-023 $14.94SFR 125-140-027 $74.70COM 125-140-028 $74.70COM 125-151-001 $14.94SFR 125-151-002 $14.94SFR 125-151-003 $14.94SFR 125-151-004 $14.94SFR 125-151-005 $14.94SFR 125-151-006 $14.94SFR 125-151-007 $14.94SFR 125-151-008 $14.94SFR 125-151-009 $14.94SFR 125-151-010 $14.94SFR 125-151-011 $14.94SFR 125-151-012 $14.94SFR 125-151-013 $14.94SFR 125-151-014 $14.94SFR 125-151-015 $14.94SFR 125-152-001 $14.94SFR 125-152-002 $14.94SFR 125-152-003 $14.94SFR 125-152-004 $14.94SFR 125-152-005 $14.94SFR 125-152-006 $14.94SFR 125-152-007 $14.94SFR 125-152-008 $14.94SFR 125-152-009 $14.94SFR 125-152-010 $14.94SFR 125-152-011 $14.94SFR 125-152-012 $14.94SFR 125-152-013 $14.94SFR 125-153-001 $14.94SFR 125-153-002 $14.94SFR 125-153-003 $14.94SFR 125-153-004 $14.94SFR 125-153-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-153-006 $14.94SFR 125-153-007 $14.94SFR 125-153-008 $14.94SFR 125-155-001 $14.94SFR 125-155-002 $14.94SFR 125-155-003 $14.94SFR 125-155-004 $14.94SFR 125-155-005 $14.94SFR 125-155-006 $14.94SFR 125-155-007 $14.94SFR 125-155-008 $14.94SFR 125-155-009 $14.94SFR 125-155-010 $14.94SFR 125-155-011 $14.94SFR 125-155-012 $14.94SFR 125-155-013 $14.94SFR 125-155-014 $14.94SFR 125-155-015 $14.94SFR 125-155-016 $14.94SFR 125-155-017 $14.94SFR 125-155-021 $7.46VCOM 125-155-022 $14.94SFR 125-155-024 $7.46VSFR 125-155-026 $7.46VCOM 125-155-029 $7.46CONDO 125-155-030 $7.46CONDO 125-155-031 $7.46CONDO 125-155-032 $7.46CONDO 125-155-033 $7.46CONDO 125-155-034 $7.46CONDO 125-155-035 $7.46CONDO 125-155-036 $7.46CONDO 125-155-037 $7.46CONDO 125-155-038 $7.46CONDO 125-155-039 $7.46CONDO 125-155-040 $7.46CONDO 125-155-041 $7.46CONDO 125-155-042 $7.46CONDO 125-155-043 $7.46CONDO 125-155-044 $7.46CONDO 125-155-045 $7.46CONDO 125-155-046 $7.46CONDO 125-155-047 $7.46CONDO 125-155-048 $7.46CONDO 125-155-049 $7.46CONDO 125-155-050 $7.46CONDO 125-155-051 $14.94SFR 125-155-052 $14.94SFR 125-156-001 $14.94SFR 125-156-002 $14.94SFR 125-156-003 $14.94SFR 125-156-004 $14.94SFR - 77 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-156-005 $14.94SFR 125-156-006 $14.94SFR 125-156-007 $14.94SFR 125-156-008 $14.94SFR 125-156-009 $14.94SFR 125-156-010 $14.94SFR 125-156-011 $14.94SFR 125-156-012 $14.94SFR 125-156-013 $14.94SFR 125-156-014 $14.94SFR 125-156-015 $14.94SFR 125-156-016 $14.94SFR 125-156-017 $14.94SFR 125-156-018 $14.94SFR 125-156-019 $14.94SFR 125-156-020 $14.94SFR 125-156-021 $14.94SFR 125-156-022 $14.94SFR 125-156-023 $14.94SFR 125-156-024 $14.94SFR 125-156-025 $14.94SFR 125-156-026 $14.94SFR 125-156-027 $14.94SFR 125-156-028 $14.94SFR 125-156-029 $14.94SFR 125-156-030 $14.94SFR 125-156-031 $14.94SFR 125-156-032 $14.94SFR 125-156-033 $14.94SFR 125-156-034 $14.94SFR 125-156-035 $14.94SFR 125-156-036 $14.94SFR 125-156-037 $14.94SFR 125-156-038 $14.94SFR 125-156-039 $14.94SFR 125-161-001 $14.94SFR 125-161-002 $14.94SFR 125-161-003 $14.94SFR 125-161-004 $14.94SFR 125-161-005 $14.94SFR 125-161-006 $14.94SFR 125-161-007 $14.94SFR 125-161-008 $14.94SFR 125-161-009 $14.94SFR 125-161-010 $14.94SFR 125-162-001 $14.94SFR 125-162-002 $14.94SFR 125-162-003 $14.94SFR 125-162-004 $14.94SFR 125-163-001 $14.94SFR 125-163-002 $14.94SFR 125-163-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-163-004 $14.94SFR 125-163-005 $14.94SFR 125-163-006 $14.94SFR 125-163-007 $14.94SFR 125-163-008 $14.94SFR 125-163-009 $14.94SFR 125-163-010 $14.94SFR 125-163-011 $14.94SFR 125-163-012 $14.94SFR 125-163-013 $14.94SFR 125-163-014 $14.94SFR 125-163-015 $14.94SFR 125-163-016 $14.94SFR 125-163-017 $14.94SFR 125-163-018 $14.94SFR 125-163-019 $14.94SFR 125-163-020 $14.94SFR 125-163-021 $14.94SFR 125-163-022 $14.94SFR 125-164-001 $14.94SFR 125-164-002 $14.94SFR 125-164-003 $14.94SFR 125-164-004 $14.94SFR 125-164-005 $14.94SFR 125-164-006 $14.94SFR 125-164-007 $14.94SFR 125-164-008 $14.94SFR 125-164-009 $14.94SFR 125-164-010 $14.94SFR 125-165-001 $14.94SFR 125-165-002 $14.94SFR 125-165-003 $14.94SFR 125-165-004 $14.94SFR 125-165-005 $14.94SFR 125-165-006 $14.94SFR 125-165-007 $14.94SFR 125-165-008 $14.94SFR 125-165-009 $14.94SFR 125-171-001 $14.94SFR 125-171-002 $14.94SFR 125-171-003 $14.94SFR 125-171-004 $14.94SFR 125-171-005 $14.94SFR 125-171-006 $14.94SFR 125-172-001 $14.94SFR 125-172-002 $14.94SFR 125-172-003 $14.94SFR 125-172-004 $14.94SFR 125-172-005 $14.94SFR 125-172-006 $14.94SFR 125-172-007 $14.94SFR 125-172-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-172-009 $14.94SFR 125-173-001 $14.94SFR 125-173-002 $14.94SFR 125-173-003 $14.94SFR 125-173-004 $14.94SFR 125-173-005 $14.94SFR 125-174-001 $14.94SFR 125-174-002 $14.94SFR 125-174-003 $14.94SFR 125-174-004 $14.94SFR 125-174-005 $14.94SFR 125-174-006 $14.94SFR 125-174-007 $14.94SFR 125-174-008 $14.94SFR 125-174-009 $14.94SFR 125-174-010 $14.94SFR 125-181-001 $14.94SFR 125-181-002 $14.94SFR 125-181-003 $14.94SFR 125-181-004 $14.94SFR 125-181-005 $14.94SFR 125-181-006 $14.94SFR 125-181-007 $14.94SFR 125-181-008 $14.94SFR 125-182-001 $14.94SFR 125-182-002 $14.94SFR 125-182-003 $14.94SFR 125-182-004 $14.94SFR 125-182-005 $14.94SFR 125-182-006 $14.94SFR 125-182-007 $14.94SFR 125-182-008 $14.94SFR 125-182-009 $14.94SFR 125-182-010 $14.94SFR 125-182-011 $14.94SFR 125-182-012 $14.94SFR 125-182-013 $14.94SFR 125-182-014 $14.94SFR 125-182-015 $14.94SFR 125-182-016 $14.94SFR 125-182-017 $14.94SFR 125-182-018 $14.94SFR 125-182-019 $14.94SFR 125-182-020 $14.94SFR 125-183-001 $14.94SFR 125-183-002 $14.94SFR 125-183-003 $14.94SFR 125-183-004 $14.94SFR 125-183-005 $14.94SFR 125-183-006 $14.94SFR 125-184-001 $14.94SFR 125-184-002 $14.94SFR - 78 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-184-003 $14.94SFR 125-184-004 $14.94SFR 125-184-005 $14.94SFR 125-184-006 $14.94SFR 125-184-007 $14.94SFR 125-184-008 $14.94SFR 125-185-003 $14.94SFR 125-185-018 $14.94SFR 125-185-022 $14.94SFR 125-185-023 $14.94SFR 125-185-024 $14.94SFR 125-185-025 $14.94SFR 125-185-026 $14.94SFR 125-186-001 $14.94SFR 125-186-002 $14.94SFR 125-186-003 $14.94SFR 125-186-004 $14.94SFR 125-186-005 $14.94SFR 125-191-001 $14.94SFR 125-191-002 $14.94SFR 125-191-003 $14.94SFR 125-191-004 $14.94SFR 125-191-005 $14.94SFR 125-191-006 $14.94SFR 125-191-007 $14.94SFR 125-191-008 $14.94SFR 125-191-009 $14.94SFR 125-191-010 $14.94SFR 125-191-011 $14.94SFR 125-191-012 $14.94SFR 125-191-013 $14.94SFR 125-191-014 $14.94SFR 125-191-015 $14.94SFR 125-191-016 $14.94SFR 125-191-017 $14.94SFR 125-192-001 $14.94SFR 125-192-002 $14.94SFR 125-192-003 $14.94SFR 125-192-004 $14.94SFR 125-192-005 $14.94SFR 125-192-006 $14.94SFR 125-192-007 $14.94SFR 125-192-008 $14.94SFR 125-192-009 $14.94SFR 125-193-001 $14.94SFR 125-193-002 $14.94SFR 125-193-003 $14.94SFR 125-193-004 $14.94SFR 125-193-005 $14.94SFR 125-193-006 $14.94SFR 125-193-007 $14.94SFR 125-193-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-193-009 $14.94SFR 125-193-010 $14.94SFR 125-193-011 $14.94SFR 125-193-012 $14.94SFR 125-193-013 $14.94SFR 125-193-014 $14.94SFR 125-193-015 $14.94SFR 125-193-016 $14.94SFR 125-193-017 $14.94SFR 125-193-018 $14.94SFR 125-193-045 $14.94SFR 125-193-050 $14.94SFR 125-193-051 $14.94SFR 125-193-052 $14.94SFR 125-193-053 $14.94SFR 125-193-054 $14.94SFR 125-193-055 $14.94SFR 125-193-056 $14.94SFR 125-220-002 $74.70COM 125-220-007 $74.70IND 125-220-010 $74.70IND 125-220-011 $74.70COM 125-220-012 $74.70COM 125-220-015 $74.70IND 125-220-016 $74.70IND 125-220-017 $74.70COM 125-220-018 $74.70COM 125-220-019 $74.70VIND 125-220-020 $7.46VCOM 125-231-010 $74.70IND 125-231-011 $74.70IND 125-231-012 $74.70IND 125-231-013 $74.70IND 125-232-002 $74.70IND 125-232-003 $74.70IND 125-232-005 $74.70IND 125-232-006 $74.70COM 125-232-007 $74.70IND 125-232-008 $74.70IND 125-240-023 $74.70IND 125-240-029 $74.70IND 125-240-032 $74.70IND 125-240-034 $74.70COM 125-240-037 $74.70IND 125-240-038 $74.70IND 125-240-045 $74.70COM 125-240-046 $74.70COM 125-240-047 $74.70COM 125-240-048 $74.70IND 125-240-049 $74.70IND 125-240-050 $74.70IND 125-240-056 $74.70IND Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-250-001 $74.70IND 125-260-001 $14.94SFR 125-260-002 $14.94SFR 125-260-005 $14.94SFR 125-260-006 $7.46VSFR 125-260-007 $14.94SFR 125-260-008 $14.94SFR 125-260-009 $14.94SFR 125-260-010 $7.46VSFR 125-260-011 $14.94SFR 125-260-012 $14.94SFR 125-271-001 $14.94SFR 125-271-004 $14.94SFR 125-271-006 $14.94SFR 125-271-009 $14.94SFR 125-271-010 $14.94SFR 125-271-012 $14.94SFR 125-271-013 $7.46VSFR 125-271-014 $14.94SFR 125-271-015 $14.94SFR 125-271-016 $14.94SFR 125-272-002 $14.94SFR 125-272-003 $14.94SFR 125-272-004 $7.46VSFR 125-272-005 $14.94SFR 125-272-006 $14.94SFR 125-272-007 $14.94SFR 125-272-008 $14.94SFR 125-272-009 $14.94SFR 125-272-012 $14.94SFR 125-272-013 $14.94SFR 125-272-014 $14.94SFR 125-272-015 $14.94SFR 125-272-017 $14.94SFR 125-272-018 $14.94SFR 125-272-023 $14.94SFR 125-272-024 $14.94SFR 125-272-025 $14.94SFR 125-272-026 $14.94SFR 125-272-027 $7.46VSFR 125-272-028 $14.94SFR 125-281-001 $14.94SFR 125-281-002 $14.94SFR 125-281-003 $14.94SFR 125-281-004 $14.94SFR 125-281-005 $14.94SFR 125-281-006 $14.94SFR 125-281-008 $14.94SFR 125-281-009 $14.94SFR 125-281-010 $14.94SFR 125-281-011 $14.94SFR 125-281-012 $14.94SFR - 79 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-281-013 $14.94SFR 125-281-014 $14.94SFR 125-282-001 $14.94SFR 125-282-002 $14.94SFR 125-282-004 $14.94SFR 125-282-005 $14.94SFR 125-282-009 $14.94SFR 125-282-010 $14.94SFR 125-282-011 $14.94SFR 125-282-012 $14.94SFR 125-282-013 $14.94SFR 125-282-014 $14.94SFR 125-282-016 $14.94SFR 125-282-017 $14.94SFR 125-282-018 $14.94SFR 125-282-019 $14.94SFR 125-282-021 $14.94SFR 125-282-022 $14.94SFR 125-282-023 $14.94SFR 125-282-024 $14.94SFR 125-282-026 $14.94SFR 125-282-027 $14.94SFR 125-282-028 $14.94SFR 125-282-029 $14.94SFR 125-292-004 $14.94SFR 125-292-005 $14.94SFR 125-292-006 $14.94SFR 125-292-007 $14.94SFR 125-292-008 $14.94SFR 125-330-001 $7.46CONDO 125-330-002 $7.46CONDO 125-330-003 $7.46CONDO 125-330-004 $7.46CONDO 125-330-005 $7.46CONDO 125-330-006 $7.46CONDO 125-330-007 $7.46CONDO 125-330-008 $7.46CONDO 125-330-009 $7.46CONDO 125-330-010 $7.46CONDO 125-330-011 $7.46CONDO 125-330-012 $7.46CONDO 125-330-013 $7.46CONDO 125-330-014 $7.46CONDO 125-330-015 $7.46CONDO 125-330-016 $7.46CONDO 125-330-017 $7.46CONDO 125-330-018 $7.46CONDO 125-330-019 $7.46CONDO 125-330-020 $7.46CONDO 125-330-021 $7.46CONDO 125-330-022 $7.46CONDO 125-330-023 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-330-024 $7.46CONDO 125-330-025 $7.46CONDO 125-330-026 $7.46CONDO 125-330-027 $7.46CONDO 125-330-028 $7.46CONDO 125-330-029 $7.46CONDO 125-330-030 $7.46CONDO 125-330-031 $7.46CONDO 125-330-032 $7.46CONDO 125-330-033 $7.46CONDO 125-330-034 $7.46CONDO 125-330-035 $7.46CONDO 125-330-036 $7.46CONDO 125-330-037 $7.46CONDO 125-330-038 $7.46CONDO 125-330-039 $7.46CONDO 125-330-040 $7.46CONDO 125-330-041 $7.46CONDO 125-330-042 $7.46CONDO 125-330-043 $7.46CONDO 125-330-044 $7.46CONDO 125-330-045 $7.46CONDO 125-340-014 $74.70INST 125-350-001 $7.46CONDO 125-350-002 $7.46CONDO 125-350-003 $7.46CONDO 125-350-004 $7.46CONDO 125-350-005 $7.46CONDO 125-350-006 $7.46CONDO 125-350-007 $7.46CONDO 125-350-008 $7.46CONDO 125-350-009 $7.46CONDO 125-350-010 $7.46CONDO 125-350-011 $7.46CONDO 125-350-012 $7.46CONDO 125-350-013 $7.46CONDO 125-350-014 $7.46CONDO 125-350-015 $7.46CONDO 125-350-016 $7.46CONDO 125-350-017 $7.46CONDO 125-350-018 $7.46CONDO 125-350-019 $7.46CONDO 125-350-020 $7.46CONDO 125-350-021 $7.46CONDO 125-350-022 $7.46CONDO 125-350-023 $7.46CONDO 125-350-024 $7.46CONDO 125-350-025 $7.46CONDO 125-350-026 $7.46CONDO 125-350-027 $7.46CONDO 125-350-028 $7.46CONDO 125-350-029 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 125-350-030 $7.46CONDO 125-350-031 $7.46CONDO 125-350-032 $7.46CONDO 125-350-033 $7.46CONDO 125-350-034 $7.46CONDO 125-350-035 $7.46CONDO 125-350-036 $7.46CONDO 125-360-001 $7.46CONDO 125-360-002 $7.46CONDO 125-360-003 $7.46CONDO 125-360-004 $7.46CONDO 125-360-005 $7.46CONDO 125-360-006 $7.46CONDO 125-360-007 $7.46CONDO 125-360-008 $7.46CONDO 125-360-009 $7.46CONDO 125-360-010 $7.46CONDO 125-360-011 $7.46CONDO 125-360-012 $7.46CONDO 125-360-013 $7.46CONDO 125-360-014 $7.46CONDO 125-360-015 $7.46CONDO 125-360-016 $7.46CONDO 125-360-017 $7.46CONDO 125-360-018 $7.46CONDO 125-360-019 $7.46CONDO 125-360-020 $7.46CONDO 125-360-021 $7.46CONDO 125-360-022 $7.46CONDO 125-360-023 $7.46CONDO 125-360-024 $7.46CONDO 125-360-025 $7.46CONDO 125-360-026 $7.46CONDO 125-360-027 $7.46CONDO 125-360-028 $7.46CONDO 125-360-029 $7.46CONDO 138-050-008 $14.94SFR 138-050-009 $14.94SFR 138-050-010 $14.94SFR 138-050-011 $14.94SFR 138-050-012 $14.94SFR 138-050-013 $14.94SFR 138-050-014 $14.94SFR 138-050-019 $14.94SFR 138-050-020 $14.94SFR 138-050-022 $14.94SFR 138-050-023 $14.94SFR 138-050-024 $14.94SFR 138-050-025 $14.94SFR 138-050-036 $14.94SFR 138-050-037 $14.94SFR 138-050-038 $14.94SFR - 80 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 138-050-041 $14.94SFR 138-050-042 $14.94SFR 138-050-043 $14.94SFR 138-050-044 $14.94SFR 138-050-045 $14.94SFR 138-050-046 $14.94SFR 138-070-009 $14.94SFR 138-070-010 $7.46CONDO 138-070-011 $7.46CONDO 138-070-012 $7.46CONDO 138-070-013 $7.46CONDO 138-070-014 $7.46CONDO 138-070-015 $7.46CONDO 138-070-016 $7.46CONDO 138-070-017 $7.46CONDO 138-070-018 $7.46CONDO 138-070-019 $7.46CONDO 138-070-020 $7.46CONDO 138-070-021 $7.46CONDO 138-070-022 $7.46CONDO 138-070-023 $7.46CONDO 138-070-024 $7.46CONDO 138-070-025 $7.46CONDO 138-070-026 $7.46CONDO 138-070-027 $7.46CONDO 138-070-028 $7.46CONDO 138-070-029 $7.46CONDO 138-070-030 $7.46CONDO 138-070-031 $7.46CONDO 138-070-032 $7.46CONDO 138-070-033 $7.46CONDO 138-070-034 $7.46CONDO 138-070-035 $7.46CONDO 138-070-036 $7.46CONDO 138-070-037 $7.46CONDO 138-070-046 $7.46MISC 138-070-047 $14.94SFR 138-091-001 $7.46CONDO 138-091-002 $7.46CONDO 138-091-003 $7.46CONDO 138-091-004 $7.46CONDO 138-091-005 $7.46CONDO 138-091-006 $7.46CONDO 138-091-007 $7.46CONDO 138-091-008 $7.46CONDO 138-091-009 $7.46CONDO 138-091-010 $7.46CONDO 138-091-011 $7.46CONDO 138-091-012 $7.46CONDO 138-091-013 $7.46CONDO 138-091-014 $7.46CONDO 138-091-015 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 138-091-016 $7.46CONDO 138-091-017 $7.46CONDO 138-091-018 $7.46CONDO 138-091-019 $7.46CONDO 138-091-020 $7.46CONDO 138-091-021 $7.46CONDO 138-091-022 $7.46CONDO 138-091-023 $7.46CONDO 138-091-024 $7.46CONDO 138-091-025 $7.46CONDO 138-091-026 $7.46CONDO 138-091-027 $7.46CONDO 138-091-028 $7.46CONDO 138-091-029 $7.46CONDO 138-091-030 $7.46CONDO 138-091-031 $7.46CONDO 138-091-032 $7.46CONDO 138-091-033 $7.46CONDO 138-091-034 $7.46CONDO 138-091-035 $7.46CONDO 138-091-036 $7.46CONDO 138-091-037 $7.46CONDO 138-091-038 $7.46CONDO 138-091-039 $7.46CONDO 138-091-040 $7.46CONDO 138-091-041 $7.46CONDO 138-091-042 $7.46CONDO 138-091-043 $7.46CONDO 138-091-044 $7.46CONDO 138-091-045 $7.46CONDO 138-091-046 $7.46CONDO 138-091-047 $7.46CONDO 138-091-048 $7.46CONDO 138-091-049 $7.46CONDO 138-091-050 $7.46CONDO 138-091-051 $7.46CONDO 138-091-052 $7.46CONDO 138-091-053 $7.46CONDO 138-091-054 $7.46CONDO 138-091-055 $7.46CONDO 138-091-056 $7.46CONDO 138-091-057 $7.46CONDO 138-091-058 $7.46CONDO 138-091-059 $7.46CONDO 138-091-060 $7.46CONDO 138-100-016 $14.94SFR 138-100-017 $14.94SFR 138-100-019 $14.94SFR 138-100-020 $14.94SFR 138-100-021 $14.94SFR 138-120-005 $7.46MISC 138-120-006 $7.46MISC Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 138-120-007 $7.46MISC 138-120-008 $7.46MISC 138-120-009 $7.46MISC 138-120-010 $7.46MISC 138-120-011 $7.46MISC 138-120-012 $7.46MISC 138-120-013 $7.46MISC 138-120-014 $7.46MISC 138-120-015 $7.46MISC 138-120-016 $7.46MISC 138-120-017 $7.46MISC 138-120-018 $7.46MISC 138-120-019 $7.46MISC 138-141-012 $14.94SFR 138-141-014 $14.94SFR 138-141-015 $14.94SFR 138-141-016 $14.94SFR 138-141-017 $14.94SFR 138-141-018 $14.94SFR 138-141-020 $14.94SFR 138-180-003 $14.94SFR 138-180-008 $14.94SFR 138-180-009 $14.94SFR 138-180-010 $14.94SFR 138-200-003 $7.46MISC 138-230-030 $14.94SFR 138-230-031 $14.94SFR 138-230-032 $14.94SFR 138-230-033 $14.94SFR 138-230-034 $14.94SFR 140-092-027 $14.94SFR 140-092-028 $14.94SFR 140-092-029 $14.94SFR 140-170-018 $14.94SFR 140-170-019 $14.94SFR 140-180-035 $7.46VSFR 140-180-036 $14.94SFR 140-180-037 $14.94SFR 140-180-038 $7.46VSFR 140-220-017 $14.94SFR 140-220-018 $14.94SFR 148-170-001 $7.46VSFR 148-170-022 $14.94SFR 148-170-037 $14.94SFR 148-170-041 $7.46VMFR 148-170-042 $7.46VSFR 148-170-050 $119.52MFR8 148-202-057 $74.70COM 148-202-062 $119.52MFR8 148-202-063 $119.52MFR8 148-202-064 $119.52MFR8 148-202-065 $119.52MFR8 - 81 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 148-202-071 $74.70COM 148-202-073 $119.52MFR8 148-221-033 $74.70COM 148-221-040 $7.46VMFR 148-221-041 $119.52MFR8 148-221-042 $119.52MFR8 148-221-044 $104.58MFR7 148-231-029 $74.70COM 148-250-083 $74.70COM 148-260-007 $14.94SFR 148-260-053 $119.52MFR8 148-260-054 $119.52MFR8 148-260-055 $119.52MFR8 148-260-056 $119.52MFR8 148-260-060 $74.70COM 148-260-061 $119.52MFR8 148-260-062 $74.70COM 148-260-063 $74.70COM 148-270-017 $74.70COM 148-270-050 $74.70COM 148-270-053 $74.70COM 148-270-055 $14.94SFR 148-270-056 $14.94SFR 148-270-057 $7.46VSFR 148-270-058 $14.94SFR 148-270-059 $14.94SFR 148-270-060 $14.94SFR 148-281-001 $14.94SFR 148-281-002 $14.94SFR 148-281-003 $14.94SFR 148-281-004 $14.94SFR 148-281-005 $14.94SFR 148-281-006 $14.94SFR 148-282-001 $14.94SFR 148-282-002 $14.94SFR 148-282-003 $14.94SFR 148-282-004 $14.94SFR 148-283-001 $14.94SFR 148-283-002 $14.94SFR 148-283-003 $14.94SFR 148-283-004 $14.94SFR 148-283-005 $14.94SFR 148-283-006 $14.94SFR 148-283-007 $14.94SFR 148-283-008 $14.94SFR 148-283-009 $14.94SFR 148-292-034 $14.94SFR 148-292-035 $14.94SFR 148-292-036 $14.94SFR 148-292-037 $14.94SFR 148-292-038 $14.94SFR 148-292-039 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 148-300-005 $14.94SFR 148-300-027 $14.94SFR 148-300-028 $14.94SFR 148-300-029 $14.94SFR 148-300-030 $14.94SFR 148-300-031 $14.94SFR 148-300-032 $14.94SFR 148-300-033 $14.94SFR 148-300-034 $14.94SFR 148-300-035 $14.94SFR 148-300-036 $14.94SFR 148-300-037 $14.94SFR 148-300-038 $14.94SFR 148-300-039 $14.94SFR 148-300-040 $14.94SFR 148-300-041 $14.94SFR 148-300-042 $14.94SFR 148-300-043 $14.94SFR 148-300-044 $14.94SFR 148-300-045 $14.94SFR 148-300-046 $14.94SFR 148-300-049 $14.94SFR 148-300-050 $14.94SFR 148-300-051 $14.94SFR 148-300-052 $14.94SFR 148-300-053 $14.94SFR 148-300-054 $14.94SFR 148-300-055 $14.94SFR 148-300-056 $14.94SFR 148-300-057 $14.94SFR 148-300-058 $14.94SFR 148-300-059 $14.94SFR 148-350-021 $119.52MFR8 148-380-001 $7.46CONDO 148-380-002 $7.46CONDO 148-380-003 $7.46CONDO 148-380-004 $7.46CONDO 148-380-005 $7.46CONDO 148-380-006 $7.46CONDO 148-380-007 $7.46CONDO 148-380-008 $7.46CONDO 148-380-009 $7.46CONDO 148-380-010 $7.46CONDO 148-380-011 $7.46CONDO 148-380-012 $7.46CONDO 148-380-013 $7.46CONDO 148-380-014 $7.46CONDO 148-380-015 $7.46CONDO 148-380-016 $7.46CONDO 148-380-017 $7.46CONDO 148-380-018 $7.46CONDO 148-380-019 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 148-380-020 $7.46CONDO 148-380-021 $7.46CONDO 148-380-022 $7.46CONDO 148-380-023 $7.46CONDO 148-380-024 $7.46CONDO 148-380-025 $7.46CONDO 148-380-026 $7.46CONDO 148-380-027 $7.46CONDO 148-380-028 $7.46CONDO 148-380-029 $7.46CONDO 148-380-030 $7.46CONDO 148-400-001 $7.46CONDO 148-400-002 $7.46CONDO 148-400-003 $7.46CONDO 148-400-004 $7.46CONDO 148-400-005 $7.46CONDO 148-400-006 $7.46CONDO 148-400-007 $7.46CONDO 148-400-008 $7.46CONDO 148-400-009 $7.46CONDO 148-400-010 $7.46CONDO 148-400-011 $7.46CONDO 148-400-012 $7.46CONDO 148-400-013 $7.46CONDO 148-400-014 $7.46CONDO 148-400-015 $7.46CONDO 148-400-016 $7.46CONDO 148-400-017 $7.46CONDO 148-400-018 $7.46CONDO 148-400-019 $7.46CONDO 148-400-020 $7.46CONDO 148-400-021 $7.46CONDO 148-400-022 $7.46CONDO 148-400-023 $7.46CONDO 148-400-024 $7.46CONDO 148-400-025 $7.46CONDO 148-400-026 $7.46CONDO 148-400-027 $7.46CONDO 148-400-028 $7.46CONDO 148-400-029 $7.46CONDO 148-400-030 $7.46CONDO 148-400-031 $7.46CONDO 148-400-032 $7.46CONDO 148-400-033 $7.46CONDO 148-400-034 $7.46CONDO 148-400-035 $7.46CONDO 148-400-036 $7.46CONDO 148-400-037 $7.46CONDO 148-400-038 $7.46CONDO 148-400-039 $7.46CONDO 148-410-001 $7.46CONDO 148-410-002 $7.46CONDO - 82 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 148-410-003 $7.46CONDO 148-410-004 $7.46CONDO 148-410-005 $7.46CONDO 148-410-006 $7.46CONDO 148-410-007 $7.46CONDO 148-410-008 $7.46CONDO 148-410-009 $7.46CONDO 148-410-010 $7.46CONDO 148-410-011 $7.46CONDO 148-410-012 $7.46CONDO 148-410-013 $7.46CONDO 148-410-014 $7.46CONDO 148-420-001 $7.46CONDO 148-420-002 $7.46CONDO 148-420-003 $7.46CONDO 148-420-004 $7.46CONDO 148-420-005 $7.46CONDO 148-420-006 $7.46CONDO 148-420-007 $7.46CONDO 148-420-008 $7.46CONDO 148-420-009 $7.46CONDO 148-420-010 $7.46CONDO 148-420-011 $7.46CONDO 148-420-012 $7.46CONDO 148-420-013 $7.46CONDO 148-420-014 $7.46CONDO 148-420-015 $7.46CONDO 148-420-016 $7.46CONDO 148-420-017 $7.46CONDO 148-420-018 $7.46CONDO 148-420-019 $7.46CONDO 148-420-020 $7.46CONDO 148-420-021 $7.46CONDO 148-420-022 $7.46CONDO 148-420-023 $7.46CONDO 148-420-024 $7.46CONDO 148-420-025 $7.46CONDO 148-420-026 $7.46CONDO 148-420-027 $7.46CONDO 148-420-028 $7.46CONDO 148-420-029 $7.46CONDO 148-440-001 $7.46CONDO 148-440-002 $7.46CONDO 148-440-003 $7.46CONDO 148-440-004 $7.46CONDO 148-440-005 $7.46CONDO 148-440-006 $7.46CONDO 148-440-007 $7.46CONDO 148-440-008 $7.46CONDO 148-440-009 $7.46CONDO 148-440-010 $7.46CONDO 148-440-011 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 148-440-012 $7.46CONDO 148-440-013 $7.46CONDO 148-440-014 $7.46CONDO 148-440-015 $7.46CONDO 148-440-016 $7.46CONDO 148-440-017 $7.46CONDO 148-440-018 $7.46CONDO 148-440-019 $7.46CONDO 148-440-020 $7.46CONDO 148-440-021 $7.46CONDO 148-440-022 $7.46CONDO 148-440-023 $7.46CONDO 148-440-024 $7.46CONDO 148-440-025 $7.46CONDO 148-440-026 $7.46CONDO 148-440-027 $7.46CONDO 148-440-028 $7.46CONDO 148-440-029 $7.46CONDO 148-440-030 $7.46CONDO 148-440-031 $7.46CONDO 148-440-032 $7.46CONDO 148-440-033 $7.46CONDO 148-440-034 $7.46CONDO 148-440-035 $7.46CONDO 148-440-036 $7.46CONDO 148-440-037 $7.46CONDO 148-440-038 $7.46CONDO 148-440-039 $7.46CONDO 148-440-040 $7.46CONDO 148-440-041 $7.46CONDO 148-440-042 $7.46CONDO 148-440-043 $7.46CONDO 148-440-044 $7.46CONDO 148-440-045 $7.46CONDO 148-440-046 $7.46CONDO 148-440-047 $7.46CONDO 148-440-048 $7.46CONDO 148-440-049 $7.46CONDO 148-440-050 $7.46CONDO 148-440-051 $7.46CONDO 148-440-052 $7.46CONDO 148-440-053 $7.46CONDO 148-440-054 $7.46CONDO 148-440-055 $7.46CONDO 148-440-056 $7.46CONDO 148-440-057 $7.46CONDO 148-440-058 $7.46CONDO 148-440-059 $7.46CONDO 148-450-001 $7.46CONDO 148-450-002 $7.46CONDO 148-450-003 $7.46CONDO 148-450-004 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 148-450-005 $7.46CONDO 148-450-006 $7.46CONDO 148-450-007 $7.46CONDO 148-450-008 $7.46CONDO 148-450-009 $7.46CONDO 148-450-010 $7.46CONDO 148-450-011 $7.46CONDO 148-450-012 $7.46CONDO 148-450-013 $7.46CONDO 148-450-014 $7.46CONDO 148-450-015 $7.46CONDO 148-450-016 $7.46CONDO 148-450-017 $7.46CONDO 148-450-018 $7.46CONDO 148-450-019 $7.46CONDO 148-450-020 $7.46CONDO 148-450-021 $7.46CONDO 148-450-022 $7.46CONDO 148-450-023 $7.46CONDO 148-450-024 $7.46CONDO 148-450-025 $7.46CONDO 148-450-026 $7.46CONDO 148-450-027 $7.46CONDO 148-450-028 $7.46CONDO 148-450-029 $7.46CONDO 148-450-030 $7.46CONDO 148-450-031 $7.46CONDO 148-450-032 $7.46CONDO 148-450-033 $7.46CONDO 148-450-034 $7.46CONDO 148-450-035 $7.46CONDO 148-450-036 $7.46CONDO 148-450-037 $7.46CONDO 148-450-038 $7.46CONDO 148-450-039 $7.46CONDO 148-450-040 $7.46CONDO 148-460-005 $7.46CONDO 148-460-006 $7.46CONDO 148-460-007 $7.46CONDO 148-460-008 $7.46CONDO 148-460-009 $7.46CONDO 148-460-010 $7.46CONDO 148-460-011 $7.46CONDO 148-460-012 $7.46CONDO 148-460-013 $7.46CONDO 148-460-014 $7.46CONDO 148-460-015 $7.46CONDO 148-460-016 $7.46CONDO 148-460-017 $7.46CONDO 148-460-018 $7.46CONDO 148-460-019 $7.46CONDO 148-460-020 $7.46CONDO - 83 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 148-460-021 $7.46CONDO 148-460-022 $7.46CONDO 148-460-023 $7.46CONDO 148-460-024 $7.46CONDO 148-460-025 $7.46CONDO 148-460-026 $7.46CONDO 148-460-027 $7.46CONDO 148-460-028 $7.46CONDO 148-460-029 $7.46CONDO 148-460-030 $7.46CONDO 148-460-031 $7.46CONDO 148-460-032 $7.46CONDO 148-460-033 $7.46CONDO 148-460-034 $7.46CONDO 148-460-035 $7.46CONDO 148-460-036 $7.46CONDO 148-460-037 $7.46CONDO 148-460-038 $7.46CONDO 148-460-039 $7.46CONDO 148-460-040 $7.46CONDO 148-460-046 $7.46CONDO 148-460-047 $7.46CONDO 148-460-048 $7.46CONDO 148-460-049 $7.46CONDO 148-460-050 $7.46CONDO 148-460-051 $7.46CONDO 148-460-052 $7.46CONDO 148-460-053 $7.46CONDO 148-460-054 $7.46CONDO 148-460-055 $7.46CONDO 148-460-056 $7.46CONDO 148-460-057 $7.46CONDO 148-460-058 $7.46CONDO 148-460-059 $7.46CONDO 148-460-060 $7.46CONDO 148-460-061 $7.46CONDO 148-460-062 $7.46CONDO 148-460-063 $7.46CONDO 148-460-064 $7.46CONDO 148-460-065 $7.46CONDO 148-460-066 $7.46CONDO 148-460-067 $7.46CONDO 148-460-068 $7.46CONDO 148-460-069 $7.46CONDO 148-460-070 $7.46CONDO 148-460-071 $7.46CONDO 148-460-072 $7.46CONDO 148-460-073 $7.46CONDO 148-460-074 $7.46CONDO 148-460-075 $7.46CONDO 148-460-076 $7.46CONDO 148-460-077 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 148-460-078 $7.46CONDO 148-460-079 $7.46CONDO 148-460-080 $7.46CONDO 148-460-081 $7.46CONDO 148-460-082 $7.46CONDO 148-460-083 $7.46CONDO 148-460-084 $7.46CONDO 148-460-085 $7.46CONDO 148-460-086 $7.46CONDO 148-460-087 $7.46CONDO 148-460-088 $7.46CONDO 148-460-089 $7.46CONDO 148-460-090 $7.46CONDO 148-460-091 $7.46CONDO 148-460-092 $7.46CONDO 148-460-093 $7.46CONDO 148-460-094 $7.46CONDO 148-460-095 $7.46CONDO 148-460-096 $7.46CONDO 148-460-097 $7.46CONDO 148-460-098 $7.46CONDO 148-460-099 $7.46CONDO 148-460-100 $7.46CONDO 148-460-101 $7.46CONDO 148-460-102 $7.46CONDO 148-460-103 $7.46CONDO 148-460-104 $7.46CONDO 148-460-105 $7.46CONDO 148-460-107 $7.46CONDO 148-460-108 $7.46CONDO 148-460-109 $7.46CONDO 148-460-110 $7.46CONDO 148-460-111 $7.46CONDO 148-460-112 $7.46CONDO 148-460-113 $7.46CONDO 148-460-114 $7.46CONDO 148-460-115 $7.46CONDO 148-460-116 $7.46CONDO 148-460-117 $7.46CONDO 148-460-118 $7.46CONDO 148-460-119 $7.46CONDO 148-460-120 $7.46CONDO 148-460-121 $7.46CONDO 148-460-122 $7.46CONDO 148-460-123 $7.46CONDO 148-460-124 $7.46CONDO 148-460-125 $7.46CONDO 148-460-126 $7.46CONDO 148-460-127 $7.46CONDO 148-460-128 $7.46CONDO 148-460-129 $7.46CONDO 148-460-130 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 148-460-131 $7.46CONDO 148-460-132 $7.46CONDO 148-460-133 $7.46CONDO 148-460-134 $7.46CONDO 148-460-135 $7.46CONDO 148-460-136 $7.46CONDO 148-460-137 $7.46CONDO 148-460-138 $7.46CONDO 148-460-139 $7.46CONDO 148-460-140 $7.46CONDO 148-460-141 $7.46CONDO 148-460-142 $7.46CONDO 148-460-143 $7.46CONDO 148-460-144 $7.46CONDO 148-460-145 $7.46CONDO 148-460-146 $7.46CONDO 148-460-147 $7.46CONDO 148-460-148 $7.46CONDO 148-460-149 $7.46CONDO 148-460-150 $7.46CONDO 148-460-151 $7.46CONDO 148-460-152 $7.46CONDO 148-460-153 $7.46CONDO 148-460-154 $7.46CONDO 148-460-155 $7.46CONDO 148-460-156 $7.46CONDO 148-460-157 $7.46CONDO 148-460-158 $7.46CONDO 148-460-159 $7.46CONDO 148-460-160 $7.46CONDO 148-460-161 $7.46CONDO 148-460-162 $7.46CONDO 148-460-163 $7.46CONDO 148-460-164 $7.46CONDO 148-460-165 $7.46CONDO 148-460-166 $7.46CONDO 148-480-010 $74.70COM 148-480-011 $74.70COM 148-480-014 $74.70COM 148-500-001 $7.46CONDO 148-500-002 $7.46CONDO 148-500-003 $7.46CONDO 148-500-004 $7.46CONDO 148-500-005 $7.46CONDO 148-500-006 $7.46CONDO 148-500-007 $7.46CONDO 148-500-008 $7.46CONDO 148-500-009 $7.46CONDO 148-500-010 $7.46CONDO 148-500-011 $7.46CONDO 148-500-012 $7.46CONDO 148-500-013 $7.46CONDO - 84 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 148-500-014 $7.46CONDO 148-500-015 $7.46CONDO 148-500-016 $7.46CONDO 148-500-017 $7.46CONDO 148-500-018 $7.46CONDO 148-500-019 $7.46CONDO 148-500-020 $7.46CONDO 148-500-021 $7.46CONDO 148-500-022 $7.46CONDO 148-500-023 $7.46CONDO 148-500-024 $7.46CONDO 148-500-025 $7.46CONDO 148-500-026 $7.46CONDO 148-500-027 $7.46CONDO 148-500-028 $7.46CONDO 148-500-029 $7.46CONDO 148-500-030 $7.46CONDO 148-500-031 $7.46CONDO 148-500-032 $7.46CONDO 148-500-033 $7.46CONDO 148-500-034 $7.46CONDO 148-500-035 $7.46CONDO 148-500-036 $7.46CONDO 148-500-037 $7.46CONDO 148-500-038 $7.46CONDO 148-500-039 $7.46CONDO 148-500-040 $7.46CONDO 148-500-041 $7.46CONDO 148-500-042 $7.46CONDO 148-500-043 $7.46CONDO 148-500-044 $7.46CONDO 148-500-045 $7.46CONDO 148-500-046 $7.46CONDO 148-500-047 $7.46CONDO 148-500-048 $7.46CONDO 148-500-049 $7.46CONDO 148-500-050 $7.46CONDO 148-500-051 $7.46CONDO 148-500-052 $7.46CONDO 148-500-053 $7.46CONDO 148-500-054 $7.46CONDO 148-500-056 $119.52MFR8 154-210-032 $14.94SFR 154-210-033 $14.94SFR 154-210-034 $14.94SFR 154-210-035 $14.94SFR 154-210-036 $14.94SFR 154-210-037 $14.94SFR 159-040-094 $74.70IND 159-110-027 $74.70IND 159-140-055 $74.70COM 159-150-045 $74.70INST Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 159-161-001 $14.94SFR 159-161-002 $14.94SFR 159-161-003 $14.94SFR 159-161-004 $14.94SFR 159-161-005 $14.94SFR 159-161-006 $14.94SFR 159-161-007 $14.94SFR 159-162-001 $14.94SFR 159-162-002 $14.94SFR 159-162-003 $14.94SFR 159-162-004 $14.94SFR 159-162-005 $14.94SFR 159-162-006 $14.94SFR 159-162-007 $14.94SFR 159-162-008 $14.94SFR 159-162-009 $14.94SFR 159-162-010 $14.94SFR 159-162-011 $14.94SFR 159-162-012 $14.94SFR 159-162-013 $14.94SFR 159-162-014 $14.94SFR 159-162-015 $14.94SFR 159-162-016 $14.94SFR 159-163-001 $14.94SFR 159-163-002 $14.94SFR 159-163-003 $14.94SFR 159-163-004 $14.94SFR 159-163-005 $14.94SFR 159-163-006 $14.94SFR 159-163-007 $14.94SFR 159-163-008 $14.94SFR 159-163-009 $14.94SFR 159-163-010 $14.94SFR 159-163-011 $14.94SFR 159-163-012 $14.94SFR 159-163-013 $14.94SFR 159-163-014 $14.94SFR 159-163-015 $14.94SFR 159-163-016 $14.94SFR 159-164-001 $14.94SFR 159-164-002 $14.94SFR 159-164-003 $14.94SFR 159-164-004 $14.94SFR 159-164-005 $14.94SFR 159-164-006 $14.94SFR 159-164-007 $14.94SFR 159-164-008 $14.94SFR 159-170-002 $14.94SFR 159-170-005 $14.94SFR 159-170-006 $14.94SFR 159-170-010 $14.94SFR 159-170-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 159-170-012 $14.94SFR 159-170-013 $29.88MFR2 159-170-018 $14.94SFR 159-170-019 $14.94SFR 159-170-020 $14.94SFR 159-170-021 $14.94SFR 159-170-022 $14.94SFR 159-170-023 $14.94SFR 159-170-024 $14.94SFR 159-170-025 $14.94SFR 159-170-026 $14.94SFR 159-170-027 $14.94SFR 159-170-028 $14.94SFR 159-170-036 $14.94SFR 159-170-037 $14.94SFR 159-170-038 $14.94SFR 159-170-039 $14.94SFR 159-170-040 $14.94SFR 159-170-041 $14.94SFR 159-170-042 $14.94SFR 159-170-043 $14.94SFR 159-170-044 $14.94SFR 159-170-045 $14.94SFR 159-170-046 $14.94SFR 159-170-047 $14.94SFR 159-170-048 $14.94SFR 159-170-049 $14.94SFR 159-170-050 $14.94SFR 159-170-051 $14.94SFR 159-170-052 $14.94SFR 159-170-053 $14.94SFR 159-170-054 $14.94SFR 159-170-055 $14.94SFR 159-170-056 $14.94SFR 159-170-057 $14.94SFR 159-170-058 $14.94SFR 159-170-059 $14.94SFR 159-170-060 $14.94SFR 159-170-064 $14.94SFR 159-170-065 $14.94SFR 159-170-066 $14.94SFR 159-170-067 $14.94SFR 159-170-069 $14.94SFR 159-170-070 $14.94SFR 159-170-072 $14.94SFR 159-170-073 $14.94SFR 159-180-001 $14.94SFR 159-180-002 $14.94SFR 159-180-003 $44.82MFR 159-180-004 $7.46VSFR 159-180-005 $14.94SFR 159-180-007 $14.94SFR - 85 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 159-180-008 $14.94SFR 159-180-010 $14.94SFR 159-180-011 $14.94SFR 159-180-014 $14.94SFR 159-180-015 $14.94SFR 159-180-016 $14.94SFR 159-180-019 $14.94SFR 159-180-020 $14.94SFR 159-180-021 $14.94SFR 159-180-022 $14.94SFR 159-180-023 $14.94SFR 159-180-024 $14.94SFR 159-180-025 $14.94SFR 159-180-026 $14.94SFR 159-180-027 $14.94SFR 159-180-028 $7.46VSFR 159-180-029 $14.94SFR 159-190-002 $14.94SFR 159-190-003 $14.94SFR 159-190-004 $14.94SFR 159-190-005 $14.94SFR 159-190-006 $14.94SFR 159-190-008 $14.94SFR 159-190-009 $7.46VSFR 159-190-010 $14.94SFR 159-190-011 $14.94SFR 159-190-012 $14.94SFR 159-190-014 $14.94SFR 159-190-015 $14.94SFR 159-190-017 $14.94SFR 159-190-018 $14.94SFR 159-190-020 $14.94SFR 159-190-029 $14.94SFR 159-190-030 $14.94SFR 159-190-033 $14.94SFR 159-190-034 $14.94SFR 159-190-035 $14.94SFR 159-190-036 $14.94SFR 159-190-037 $14.94SFR 159-190-038 $14.94SFR 159-190-039 $14.94SFR 159-190-040 $14.94SFR 159-190-042 $14.94SFR 159-190-043 $7.46VSFR 159-200-002 $14.94SFR 159-200-006 $14.94SFR 159-200-007 $14.94SFR 159-200-009 $14.94SFR 159-200-010 $14.94SFR 159-200-011 $14.94SFR 159-200-012 $44.82MFR 159-200-013 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 159-200-014 $14.94SFR 159-200-018 $29.88MFR2 159-200-019 $14.94SFR 159-200-020 $14.94SFR 159-200-021 $14.94SFR 159-200-022 $14.94SFR 159-200-023 $14.94SFR 159-200-025 $14.94SFR 159-200-026 $14.94SFR 159-200-027 $14.94SFR 159-200-028 $14.94SFR 159-200-029 $14.94SFR 159-200-030 $14.94SFR 159-200-032 $7.46VMFR 159-200-033 $14.94SFR 159-200-034 $14.94SFR 159-210-003 $74.70COM 159-210-004 $74.70COM 159-210-006 $14.94SFR 159-210-010 $74.70IND 159-210-011 $74.70IND 159-210-012 $74.70COM 159-210-016 $74.70COM 159-210-017 $7.46VMFR 159-210-018 $14.94SFR 159-210-024 $74.70COM 159-210-026 $89.64MFR6 159-210-027 $74.70COM 159-210-028 $14.94SFR 159-210-029 $74.70INST 159-210-030 $29.88MFR2 159-210-031 $59.76MFR4 159-210-032 $74.70COM 159-210-034 $14.94SFR 159-210-037 $74.70COM 159-210-038 $74.70IND 159-210-039 $74.70COM 159-210-040 $74.70COM 159-210-041 $74.70COM 159-220-003 $7.46VSFR 159-230-007 $7.46MISC 159-230-009 $74.70INST 159-230-010 $14.94SFR 159-240-007 $74.70COM 159-240-008 $29.88MFR2 159-240-009 $14.94SFR 159-240-010 $14.94SFR 159-300-001 $7.46VSFR 159-361-005 $74.70IND 159-361-006 $74.70IND 159-361-007 $74.70VIND 159-361-008 $74.70IND Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 159-361-009 $74.70IND 159-362-001 $74.70IND 159-362-002 $74.70IND 159-362-003 $74.70IND 159-362-004 $74.70IND 159-362-005 $74.70IND 159-362-006 $74.70IND 159-362-007 $74.70IND 159-362-008 $74.70IND 159-371-001 $74.70VIND 159-371-002 $74.70VIND 159-371-003 $74.70IND 159-371-007 $74.70IND 159-372-001 $74.70IND 159-372-002 $74.70VIND 159-372-006 $74.70IND 159-391-001 $7.46CONDO 159-391-002 $7.46CONDO 159-391-003 $7.46CONDO 159-391-004 $7.46CONDO 159-391-005 $7.46CONDO 159-391-006 $7.46CONDO 159-391-007 $7.46CONDO 159-391-008 $7.46CONDO 159-391-009 $7.46CONDO 159-391-010 $7.46CONDO 159-391-011 $7.46CONDO 159-391-012 $7.46CONDO 159-391-013 $7.46CONDO 159-391-014 $7.46CONDO 159-391-015 $7.46CONDO 159-391-016 $7.46CONDO 159-391-017 $7.46CONDO 159-391-018 $7.46CONDO 159-391-019 $7.46CONDO 159-391-020 $7.46CONDO 159-391-021 $7.46CONDO 159-391-022 $7.46CONDO 159-391-023 $7.46CONDO 159-391-024 $7.46CONDO 159-400-001 $7.46CONDO 159-400-002 $7.46CONDO 159-400-003 $7.46CONDO 159-400-004 $7.46CONDO 159-400-005 $7.46CONDO 159-400-006 $7.46CONDO 159-400-007 $7.46CONDO 159-400-008 $7.46CONDO 159-400-009 $7.46CONDO 159-400-010 $7.46CONDO 159-400-011 $7.46CONDO 159-400-012 $7.46CONDO - 86 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 159-400-013 $7.46CONDO 159-450-011 $74.70IND 159-450-012 $74.70IND 159-480-004 $7.46CONDO 159-480-005 $7.46CONDO 159-480-006 $7.46CONDO 159-480-007 $7.46CONDO 159-480-008 $7.46CONDO 159-480-009 $7.46CONDO 159-510-001 $14.94SFR 159-510-002 $14.94SFR 159-510-003 $14.94SFR 159-510-004 $14.94SFR 159-510-005 $14.94SFR 159-510-006 $14.94SFR 159-510-007 $14.94SFR 159-510-008 $14.94SFR 159-510-009 $14.94SFR 159-510-010 $14.94SFR 159-510-011 $14.94SFR 159-510-012 $14.94SFR 159-510-013 $14.94SFR 159-510-014 $14.94SFR 159-510-015 $14.94SFR 159-510-016 $14.94SFR 159-510-017 $14.94SFR 159-510-018 $14.94SFR 159-510-019 $14.94SFR 159-510-020 $14.94SFR 159-510-021 $14.94SFR 159-510-022 $14.94SFR 159-510-023 $14.94SFR 159-510-024 $14.94SFR 159-510-025 $14.94SFR 159-510-026 $14.94SFR 159-510-027 $14.94SFR 159-510-028 $14.94SFR 159-510-029 $14.94SFR 159-510-030 $14.94SFR 159-510-031 $14.94SFR 159-510-032 $14.94SFR 159-510-033 $14.94SFR 159-510-034 $14.94SFR 159-510-035 $14.94SFR 159-510-036 $14.94SFR 159-510-037 $14.94SFR 159-510-038 $14.94SFR 159-510-039 $14.94SFR 159-510-040 $14.94SFR 159-510-041 $14.94SFR 159-510-042 $14.94SFR 159-510-043 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 159-510-044 $14.94SFR 159-510-045 $14.94SFR 159-510-046 $14.94SFR 159-510-047 $14.94SFR 159-520-001 $14.94SFR 159-520-002 $14.94SFR 159-520-003 $14.94SFR 159-520-004 $14.94SFR 159-520-005 $14.94SFR 159-520-006 $14.94SFR 159-520-007 $14.94SFR 159-520-008 $14.94SFR 159-520-009 $14.94SFR 159-520-010 $14.94SFR 159-520-011 $14.94SFR 159-520-012 $14.94SFR 159-520-013 $14.94SFR 159-520-014 $14.94SFR 159-520-015 $14.94SFR 159-520-016 $14.94SFR 159-520-017 $14.94SFR 159-520-018 $14.94SFR 159-520-019 $14.94SFR 159-520-020 $14.94SFR 159-520-021 $14.94SFR 159-520-022 $14.94SFR 159-520-023 $14.94SFR 159-520-024 $14.94SFR 159-520-025 $14.94SFR 159-520-026 $14.94SFR 159-520-027 $14.94SFR 159-520-028 $14.94SFR 159-520-029 $14.94SFR 159-520-030 $14.94SFR 159-520-031 $14.94SFR 159-520-032 $14.94SFR 159-520-033 $14.94SFR 159-520-034 $14.94SFR 159-520-035 $14.94SFR 159-520-036 $14.94SFR 159-520-037 $14.94SFR 159-520-038 $14.94SFR 159-520-039 $14.94SFR 159-520-040 $14.94SFR 159-520-041 $14.94SFR 159-520-042 $14.94SFR 161-010-014 $74.70COM 161-010-015 $74.70COM 161-010-016 $74.70IND 161-010-017 $74.70COM 161-010-018 $14.94SFR 161-010-019 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 161-010-020 $7.46VCOM 161-010-021 $7.46VCOM 161-010-022 $14.94SFR 161-010-023 $74.70COM 161-150-001 $7.46MISC 161-150-009 $14.94SFR 161-150-011 $14.94SFR 161-150-012 $14.94SFR 161-202-001 $14.94SFR 161-202-002 $14.94SFR 161-211-001 $74.70COM 161-211-002 $14.94SFR 161-211-003 $14.94SFR 161-211-004 $14.94SFR 161-211-005 $14.94SFR 161-211-006 $14.94SFR 161-211-007 $14.94SFR 161-211-008 $14.94SFR 161-211-009 $14.94SFR 161-211-010 $14.94SFR 161-211-011 $14.94SFR 161-211-012 $14.94SFR 161-211-013 $14.94SFR 161-212-001 $14.94SFR 161-212-002 $14.94SFR 161-212-003 $14.94SFR 161-212-004 $14.94SFR 161-212-005 $14.94SFR 161-212-006 $14.94SFR 161-212-007 $14.94SFR 161-212-008 $14.94SFR 161-212-009 $14.94SFR 161-212-010 $14.94SFR 161-212-011 $14.94SFR 161-212-012 $14.94SFR 161-212-013 $14.94SFR 161-212-014 $7.46VCOM 161-212-029 $14.94SFR 161-212-030 $14.94SFR 161-212-031 $14.94SFR 161-212-032 $14.94SFR 161-212-033 $14.94SFR 161-212-034 $14.94SFR 161-212-035 $14.94SFR 161-212-039 $74.70COM 161-221-001 $74.70COM 161-221-002 $14.94SFR 161-221-003 $14.94SFR 161-221-005 $14.94SFR 161-221-006 $14.94SFR 161-221-007 $14.94SFR 161-221-008 $14.94SFR - 87 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 161-221-009 $14.94SFR 161-221-012 $14.94SFR 161-221-013 $14.94SFR 161-221-014 $14.94SFR 161-221-015 $14.94SFR 161-221-016 $14.94SFR 161-221-017 $14.94SFR 161-221-018 $14.94SFR 161-221-019 $14.94SFR 161-221-020 $14.94SFR 161-221-022 $74.70COM 161-221-023 $14.94SFR 161-221-024 $14.94SFR 161-221-025 $14.94SFR 161-221-026 $14.94SFR 161-221-027 $14.94SFR 161-222-001 $14.94SFR 161-222-002 $74.70COM 161-222-004 $14.94SFR 161-222-005 $14.94SFR 161-222-006 $14.94SFR 161-222-007 $44.82MFR 161-222-008 $7.46VSFR 161-222-009 $14.94SFR 161-222-010 $74.70COM 161-222-011 $74.70COM 161-223-005 $14.94SFR 161-223-008 $14.94SFR 161-223-010 $14.94SFR 161-223-011 $14.94SFR 161-223-012 $14.94SFR 161-223-013 $14.94SFR 161-231-005 $14.94SFR 161-231-006 $14.94SFR 161-231-007 $14.94SFR 161-231-008 $14.94SFR 161-231-009 $14.94SFR 161-231-010 $14.94SFR 161-231-011 $14.94SFR 161-231-012 $14.94SFR 161-231-013 $14.94SFR 161-231-014 $14.94SFR 161-231-015 $14.94SFR 161-231-016 $14.94SFR 161-231-017 $14.94SFR 161-231-018 $14.94SFR 161-231-019 $14.94SFR 161-231-020 $14.94SFR 161-231-021 $14.94SFR 161-231-022 $14.94SFR 161-231-023 $14.94SFR 161-231-024 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 161-231-025 $14.94SFR 161-231-026 $14.94SFR 161-231-027 $14.94SFR 161-231-028 $14.94SFR 161-231-029 $14.94SFR 161-231-030 $14.94SFR 161-231-031 $14.94SFR 161-231-032 $14.94SFR 161-231-033 $14.94SFR 161-231-034 $14.94SFR 161-231-035 $14.94SFR 161-231-036 $14.94SFR 161-231-037 $14.94SFR 161-231-038 $14.94SFR 161-231-039 $14.94SFR 161-231-041 $14.94SFR 161-231-042 $14.94SFR 161-231-043 $14.94SFR 161-231-044 $14.94SFR 161-231-046 $74.70IND 161-231-047 $74.70COM 161-231-048 $74.70MFR5 161-231-049 $74.70COM 161-231-050 $14.94SFR 161-231-051 $14.94SFR 161-232-001 $14.94SFR 161-232-002 $14.94SFR 161-232-003 $14.94SFR 161-232-004 $14.94SFR 161-232-005 $14.94SFR 161-232-006 $14.94SFR 161-232-007 $14.94SFR 161-232-008 $14.94SFR 161-232-009 $14.94SFR 161-232-010 $14.94SFR 161-232-016 $14.94SFR 161-232-018 $14.94SFR 161-232-019 $14.94SFR 161-240-002 $74.70VIND 161-240-004 $14.94SFR 161-240-005 $14.94SFR 161-240-006 $14.94SFR 161-240-007 $14.94SFR 161-240-010 $74.70COM 161-240-012 $74.70IND 161-240-013 $74.70VIND 161-240-015 $74.70IND 161-280-003 $14.94SFR 161-280-005 $7.46VSFR 161-280-007 $14.94SFR 161-280-012 $14.94SFR 161-280-013 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 161-280-014 $14.94SFR 161-280-015 $14.94SFR 161-280-030 $14.94SFR 161-280-033 $14.94SFR 161-280-040 $14.94SFR 161-280-041 $14.94SFR 161-280-043 $14.94SFR 161-280-045 $14.94SFR 161-550-045 $14.94SFR 161-550-046 $14.94SFR 161-550-047 $14.94SFR 161-570-001 $14.94SFR 161-570-002 $14.94SFR 161-570-003 $14.94SFR 161-570-004 $14.94SFR 161-570-005 $14.94SFR 161-570-006 $14.94SFR 161-570-007 $14.94SFR 161-570-008 $14.94SFR 161-570-009 $14.94SFR 161-570-010 $14.94SFR 161-570-011 $14.94SFR 161-570-012 $14.94SFR 161-570-013 $14.94SFR 161-570-014 $14.94SFR 161-570-015 $14.94SFR 161-570-016 $14.94SFR 161-570-017 $14.94SFR 161-570-018 $14.94SFR 161-570-019 $14.94SFR 161-570-020 $14.94SFR 161-580-001 $14.94SFR 161-580-002 $14.94SFR 161-580-003 $14.94SFR 161-580-004 $14.94SFR 161-580-005 $14.94SFR 161-580-006 $14.94SFR 161-580-007 $14.94SFR 161-580-008 $14.94SFR 161-580-009 $14.94SFR 161-580-010 $14.94SFR 161-580-011 $14.94SFR 161-580-012 $14.94SFR 161-580-013 $14.94SFR 161-580-014 $14.94SFR 161-580-015 $14.94SFR 161-580-016 $14.94SFR 161-580-017 $14.94SFR 161-580-018 $14.94SFR 161-580-019 $14.94SFR 161-580-020 $14.94SFR 161-580-021 $14.94SFR - 88 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 161-580-022 $14.94SFR 161-580-023 $14.94SFR 161-580-024 $14.94SFR 161-580-025 $14.94SFR 161-580-026 $14.94SFR 161-580-027 $14.94SFR 161-580-028 $14.94SFR 161-580-029 $14.94SFR 161-580-030 $14.94SFR 161-580-031 $14.94SFR 161-580-032 $14.94SFR 161-580-033 $14.94SFR 161-580-034 $14.94SFR 161-580-035 $14.94SFR 161-580-036 $14.94SFR 161-580-037 $14.94SFR 161-580-038 $14.94SFR 161-580-039 $14.94SFR 161-580-040 $14.94SFR 161-580-041 $14.94SFR 161-580-042 $14.94SFR 161-580-043 $14.94SFR 161-580-044 $14.94SFR 161-580-045 $14.94SFR 161-580-046 $14.94SFR 161-580-047 $14.94SFR 161-580-048 $14.94SFR 161-580-049 $14.94SFR 161-580-050 $14.94SFR 161-580-051 $14.94SFR 161-580-052 $14.94SFR 161-580-053 $14.94SFR 161-580-054 $14.94SFR 161-580-055 $14.94SFR 161-580-056 $14.94SFR 161-580-057 $14.94SFR 161-580-058 $14.94SFR 161-580-059 $14.94SFR 161-580-060 $14.94SFR 161-580-061 $14.94SFR 161-580-062 $14.94SFR 161-580-063 $14.94SFR 161-580-064 $14.94SFR 161-580-065 $14.94SFR 161-580-066 $14.94SFR 161-580-067 $14.94SFR 161-580-068 $14.94SFR 161-580-069 $14.94SFR 161-580-070 $14.94SFR 161-580-071 $14.94SFR 161-580-072 $14.94SFR 161-580-073 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 161-580-074 $14.94SFR 161-580-075 $14.94SFR 161-580-076 $14.94SFR 161-580-077 $14.94SFR 161-580-078 $14.94SFR 161-580-079 $14.94SFR 161-580-080 $14.94SFR 161-580-081 $14.94SFR 161-580-082 $14.94SFR 161-580-083 $14.94SFR 161-580-084 $14.94SFR 161-580-085 $14.94SFR 161-580-086 $14.94SFR 161-580-087 $14.94SFR 161-580-088 $14.94SFR 161-580-089 $14.94SFR 161-580-090 $14.94SFR 161-580-091 $14.94SFR 161-580-092 $14.94SFR 161-580-093 $14.94SFR 161-580-094 $14.94SFR 161-580-095 $14.94SFR 161-580-096 $14.94SFR 161-580-097 $14.94SFR 161-580-098 $14.94SFR 161-580-099 $14.94SFR 161-580-100 $14.94SFR 161-580-101 $14.94SFR 161-580-102 $14.94SFR 161-580-103 $14.94SFR 161-580-104 $14.94SFR 161-580-105 $14.94SFR 161-580-106 $14.94SFR 161-580-107 $14.94SFR 161-580-108 $14.94SFR 161-580-109 $14.94SFR 161-580-110 $14.94SFR 161-580-111 $14.94SFR 161-580-112 $14.94SFR 161-580-113 $14.94SFR 161-580-114 $14.94SFR 161-580-115 $14.94SFR 161-580-116 $14.94SFR 161-580-117 $14.94SFR 161-580-118 $14.94SFR 161-580-119 $14.94SFR 161-580-120 $14.94SFR 161-580-121 $14.94SFR 161-580-122 $14.94SFR 161-580-123 $14.94SFR 161-580-124 $14.94SFR 161-580-125 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 161-580-126 $14.94SFR 161-580-127 $14.94SFR 161-580-128 $14.94SFR 164-311-001 $14.94SFR 164-311-002 $14.94SFR 164-311-003 $14.94SFR 164-311-004 $14.94SFR 164-311-005 $14.94SFR 164-311-006 $14.94SFR 164-311-007 $14.94SFR 164-311-008 $14.94SFR 164-311-009 $14.94SFR 164-311-010 $14.94SFR 164-311-011 $14.94SFR 164-311-012 $14.94SFR 164-312-001 $14.94SFR 164-312-002 $14.94SFR 164-312-003 $14.94SFR 164-312-004 $14.94SFR 164-312-007 $14.94SFR 164-312-008 $14.94SFR 164-312-009 $14.94SFR 164-312-010 $14.94SFR 164-312-011 $14.94SFR 164-312-012 $14.94SFR 164-312-013 $14.94SFR 164-312-014 $14.94SFR 164-312-015 $14.94SFR 164-312-016 $14.94SFR 164-312-017 $14.94SFR 164-312-018 $14.94SFR 164-312-019 $14.94SFR 164-312-020 $14.94SFR 164-312-021 $14.94SFR 164-312-022 $14.94SFR 164-312-023 $14.94SFR 164-312-024 $14.94SFR 164-312-025 $14.94SFR 164-312-026 $14.94SFR 164-312-027 $14.94SFR 164-312-028 $14.94SFR 164-312-029 $14.94SFR 164-312-030 $14.94SFR 164-312-031 $14.94SFR 164-312-032 $14.94SFR 164-312-033 $14.94SFR 164-312-034 $14.94SFR 164-312-035 $14.94SFR 164-312-036 $14.94SFR 164-312-037 $14.94SFR 164-321-001 $14.94SFR 164-321-002 $14.94SFR - 89 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 164-321-003 $14.94SFR 164-322-001 $14.94SFR 164-322-002 $14.94SFR 164-322-003 $14.94SFR 164-322-004 $14.94SFR 164-322-007 $14.94SFR 164-322-008 $14.94SFR 164-323-001 $14.94SFR 164-323-002 $14.94SFR 164-323-003 $14.94SFR 164-323-004 $14.94SFR 164-323-005 $14.94SFR 164-323-006 $14.94SFR 164-323-009 $14.94SFR 164-323-010 $14.94SFR 164-323-011 $14.94SFR 164-324-001 $14.94SFR 164-324-002 $14.94SFR 164-324-003 $14.94SFR 164-324-004 $14.94SFR 164-325-001 $14.94SFR 164-325-002 $14.94SFR 164-325-003 $14.94SFR 164-325-004 $14.94SFR 164-325-005 $14.94SFR 164-325-006 $14.94SFR 164-325-007 $14.94SFR 166-010-002 $14.94SFR 166-010-003 $14.94SFR 166-010-009 $14.94SFR 166-010-011 $14.94SFR 166-010-014 $14.94SFR 166-010-017 $14.94SFR 166-010-018 $14.94SFR 166-010-019 $14.94SFR 166-010-040 $14.94SFR 166-010-041 $14.94SFR 166-010-058 $7.46VSFR 166-030-006 $14.94SFR 166-030-009 $14.94SFR 166-030-010 $14.94SFR 166-030-011 $14.94SFR 166-030-013 $14.94SFR 166-180-029 $14.94SFR 166-180-030 $14.94SFR 166-180-031 $14.94SFR 166-180-032 $14.94SFR 166-200-032 $7.46VSFR 166-220-015 $14.94SFR 166-220-016 $14.94SFR 166-220-017 $14.94SFR 166-220-018 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 166-220-019 $14.94SFR 166-220-020 $14.94SFR 166-220-021 $14.94SFR 166-220-022 $14.94SFR 166-220-023 $14.94SFR 166-220-024 $14.94SFR 166-220-025 $14.94SFR 166-220-026 $14.94SFR 166-220-027 $14.94SFR 166-220-028 $14.94SFR 166-220-029 $14.94SFR 166-220-030 $14.94SFR 166-220-031 $14.94SFR 166-220-050 $14.94SFR 166-220-051 $14.94SFR 166-220-052 $14.94SFR 166-220-053 $14.94SFR 166-220-055 $14.94SFR 166-220-056 $14.94SFR 166-220-057 $14.94SFR 166-220-068 $14.94SFR 166-220-081 $14.94SFR 166-220-082 $14.94SFR 166-220-083 $14.94SFR 166-220-084 $14.94SFR 166-230-032 $14.94SFR 166-230-033 $14.94SFR 166-230-034 $14.94SFR 166-230-035 $14.94SFR 166-230-036 $14.94SFR 166-230-037 $14.94SFR 166-230-038 $14.94SFR 166-230-039 $14.94SFR 166-230-040 $14.94SFR 166-230-041 $14.94SFR 166-230-042 $14.94SFR 166-230-043 $14.94SFR 166-230-044 $14.94SFR 166-230-045 $14.94SFR 166-230-046 $14.94SFR 166-250-001 $14.94SFR 166-250-002 $14.94SFR 166-250-003 $14.94SFR 166-250-004 $14.94SFR 166-250-005 $14.94SFR 166-250-006 $14.94SFR 166-250-007 $14.94SFR 166-250-008 $14.94SFR 166-250-009 $14.94SFR 166-250-010 $14.94SFR 166-341-020 $14.94SFR 166-341-021 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 166-360-001 $14.94SFR 166-360-002 $14.94SFR 166-360-003 $14.94SFR 166-420-001 $7.46VSFR 166-420-002 $7.46VSFR 166-420-003 $7.46VSFR 166-420-004 $7.46VSFR 166-420-005 $7.46VSFR 166-420-006 $7.46VSFR 166-420-014 $7.46VSFR 166-420-015 $7.46VSFR 166-420-028 $7.46VSFR 166-420-029 $7.46VSFR 167-010-001 $14.94SFR 167-010-003 $14.94SFR 167-010-004 $14.94SFR 167-010-005 $14.94SFR 167-010-006 $14.94SFR 167-010-007 $14.94SFR 167-010-010 $14.94SFR 167-010-011 $14.94SFR 167-010-012 $14.94SFR 167-010-013 $14.94SFR 167-010-014 $14.94SFR 167-010-015 $7.46VSFR 167-010-016 $14.94SFR 167-010-017 $7.46VSFR 167-010-019 $14.94SFR 169-040-024 $14.94SFR 169-040-025 $14.94SFR 169-040-026 $14.94SFR 169-040-027 $14.94SFR 169-040-028 $14.94SFR 169-040-029 $14.94SFR 169-040-030 $14.94SFR 169-040-031 $14.94SFR 169-041-003 $14.94SFR 169-041-004 $14.94SFR 169-041-005 $14.94SFR 169-041-006 $14.94SFR 169-060-016 $14.94SFR 169-060-017 $14.94SFR 169-060-018 $14.94SFR 169-060-019 $14.94SFR 169-060-020 $14.94SFR 169-060-021 $14.94SFR 169-060-022 $14.94SFR 169-060-023 $14.94SFR 169-060-024 $14.94SFR 169-060-025 $14.94SFR 169-060-026 $14.94SFR 169-060-027 $14.94SFR - 90 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 169-060-028 $14.94SFR 169-060-029 $14.94SFR 169-060-030 $14.94SFR 169-060-031 $14.94SFR 169-060-032 $14.94SFR 169-060-033 $14.94SFR 169-060-034 $14.94SFR 169-060-035 $14.94SFR 169-060-036 $14.94SFR 169-060-037 $14.94SFR 169-060-038 $14.94SFR 169-060-039 $14.94SFR 169-060-040 $14.94SFR 169-061-001 $14.94SFR 169-061-002 $14.94SFR 169-061-003 $14.94SFR 169-061-004 $14.94SFR 169-061-005 $14.94SFR 169-061-007 $14.94SFR 169-180-014 $7.46VSFR 169-180-015 $29.88MFR2 169-221-029 $14.94SFR 169-221-030 $14.94SFR 169-221-031 $14.94SFR 169-222-028 $14.94SFR 169-222-029 $14.94SFR 169-222-030 $14.94SFR 169-222-031 $14.94SFR 169-222-032 $14.94SFR 169-231-020 $14.94SFR 169-231-021 $14.94SFR 169-231-022 $14.94SFR 169-232-015 $14.94SFR 169-232-016 $14.94SFR 169-232-018 $14.94SFR 169-232-019 $14.94SFR 169-232-020 $14.94SFR 169-232-021 $14.94SFR 169-232-022 $14.94SFR 169-232-023 $14.94SFR 169-232-025 $14.94SFR 169-232-027 $14.94SFR 169-232-028 $14.94SFR 169-232-031 $14.94SFR 172-012-027 $7.46CONDO 172-012-028 $7.46CONDO 172-012-029 $7.46CONDO 172-012-030 $7.46CONDO 172-012-031 $7.46CONDO 172-012-032 $7.46CONDO 172-012-033 $7.46CONDO 172-012-034 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 172-012-035 $7.46CONDO 172-012-036 $7.46CONDO 172-012-037 $7.46CONDO 172-012-038 $7.46CONDO 172-012-039 $7.46CONDO 172-012-040 $7.46CONDO 172-012-041 $7.46CONDO 172-012-042 $7.46CONDO 172-031-023 $74.70COM 172-040-004 $14.94SFR 172-040-005 $14.94SFR 172-040-006 $14.94SFR 172-040-007 $14.94SFR 172-040-008 $14.94SFR 172-040-009 $14.94SFR 172-040-012 $14.94SFR 172-040-013 $14.94SFR 172-040-014 $14.94SFR 172-040-015 $14.94SFR 172-040-016 $14.94SFR 172-040-019 $14.94SFR 172-040-020 $14.94SFR 172-040-021 $14.94SFR 172-040-022 $14.94SFR 172-040-031 $14.94SFR 172-040-032 $14.94SFR 172-040-037 $14.94SFR 172-051-002 $14.94SFR 172-051-003 $14.94SFR 172-051-004 $14.94SFR 172-051-005 $14.94SFR 172-051-006 $14.94SFR 172-051-007 $14.94SFR 172-051-008 $14.94SFR 172-051-009 $14.94SFR 172-051-010 $14.94SFR 172-051-011 $14.94SFR 172-051-012 $14.94SFR 172-051-013 $14.94SFR 172-053-001 $14.94SFR 172-053-002 $14.94SFR 172-053-003 $14.94SFR 172-053-004 $14.94SFR 172-053-005 $14.94SFR 172-053-006 $14.94SFR 172-054-002 $14.94SFR 172-054-003 $14.94SFR 172-054-004 $14.94SFR 172-054-005 $14.94SFR 172-054-006 $14.94SFR 172-054-007 $14.94SFR 172-054-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 172-054-009 $14.94SFR 172-054-010 $14.94SFR 172-054-011 $14.94SFR 172-054-013 $14.94SFR 172-054-014 $14.94SFR 172-054-015 $14.94SFR 172-061-001 $14.94SFR 172-061-002 $14.94SFR 172-061-003 $14.94SFR 172-061-004 $14.94SFR 172-061-007 $14.94SFR 172-061-008 $14.94SFR 172-061-010 $14.94SFR 172-061-012 $14.94SFR 172-061-013 $14.94SFR 172-061-014 $14.94SFR 172-061-015 $14.94SFR 172-061-019 $14.94SFR 172-061-026 $14.94SFR 172-061-027 $14.94SFR 172-061-029 $14.94SFR 172-061-030 $14.94SFR 172-061-031 $14.94SFR 172-061-032 $14.94SFR 172-061-033 $7.46VSFR 172-061-034 $29.88MFR2 172-061-035 $14.94SFR 172-061-036 $14.94SFR 172-061-037 $7.46VSFR 172-061-038 $14.94SFR 172-062-004 $14.94SFR 172-062-005 $14.94SFR 172-062-006 $14.94SFR 172-062-007 $14.94SFR 172-062-008 $14.94SFR 172-062-010 $14.94SFR 172-062-011 $14.94SFR 172-062-012 $14.94SFR 172-062-014 $14.94SFR 172-062-015 $14.94SFR 172-062-016 $14.94SFR 172-062-017 $14.94SFR 172-062-019 $14.94SFR 172-062-021 $14.94SFR 172-062-022 $14.94SFR 172-062-023 $14.94SFR 172-071-001 $14.94SFR 172-071-002 $14.94SFR 172-071-003 $14.94SFR 172-071-004 $14.94SFR 172-071-005 $14.94SFR 172-071-006 $14.94SFR - 91 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 172-071-007 $14.94SFR 172-071-008 $14.94SFR 172-071-009 $14.94SFR 172-071-010 $14.94SFR 172-071-016 $14.94SFR 172-071-017 $14.94SFR 172-071-018 $14.94SFR 172-071-019 $14.94SFR 172-071-020 $14.94SFR 172-071-021 $14.94SFR 172-071-025 $14.94SFR 172-071-026 $14.94SFR 172-071-028 $14.94SFR 172-071-030 $14.94SFR 172-071-032 $14.94SFR 172-071-037 $14.94SFR 172-071-038 $7.46VSFR 172-091-001 $14.94SFR 172-091-002 $14.94SFR 172-091-003 $14.94SFR 172-091-005 $14.94SFR 172-091-006 $14.94SFR 172-091-007 $14.94SFR 172-091-008 $14.94SFR 172-091-009 $14.94SFR 172-091-010 $14.94SFR 172-091-011 $14.94SFR 172-091-012 $14.94SFR 172-091-013 $14.94SFR 172-091-014 $14.94SFR 172-091-015 $14.94SFR 172-091-016 $14.94SFR 172-091-017 $14.94SFR 172-091-018 $14.94SFR 172-091-019 $14.94SFR 172-091-020 $14.94SFR 172-100-004 $14.94SFR 172-100-005 $14.94SFR 172-100-009 $14.94SFR 172-100-010 $14.94SFR 172-100-011 $14.94SFR 172-100-014 $14.94SFR 172-100-015 $14.94SFR 172-100-019 $14.94SFR 172-100-020 $14.94SFR 172-100-023 $14.94SFR 172-100-024 $14.94SFR 172-100-025 $14.94SFR 172-100-026 $14.94SFR 172-100-027 $14.94SFR 172-100-028 $14.94SFR 172-100-029 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 172-100-030 $14.94SFR 172-100-031 $14.94SFR 172-100-032 $14.94SFR 172-100-033 $14.94SFR 172-100-034 $14.94SFR 172-100-035 $14.94SFR 172-100-036 $14.94SFR 172-100-037 $14.94SFR 172-100-039 $29.88MFR2 172-100-040 $14.94SFR 172-100-041 $14.94SFR 172-120-002 $14.94SFR 172-120-003 $14.94SFR 172-120-004 $14.94SFR 172-120-005 $14.94SFR 172-120-006 $14.94SFR 172-120-007 $14.94SFR 172-120-008 $14.94SFR 172-120-009 $14.94SFR 172-120-010 $14.94SFR 172-120-011 $14.94SFR 172-120-012 $14.94SFR 172-120-013 $14.94SFR 172-120-025 $14.94SFR 172-120-027 $14.94SFR 172-120-028 $14.94SFR 172-120-051 $14.94SFR 172-120-052 $14.94SFR 172-150-016 $14.94SFR 172-150-027 $14.94SFR 172-150-028 $14.94SFR 172-150-029 $14.94SFR 172-150-030 $14.94SFR 172-150-031 $14.94SFR 172-160-003 $14.94SFR 172-160-004 $14.94SFR 172-160-005 $14.94SFR 172-160-006 $14.94SFR 172-160-018 $14.94SFR 172-160-019 $14.94SFR 172-160-020 $14.94SFR 172-160-021 $14.94SFR 172-160-022 $14.94SFR 172-160-023 $14.94SFR 172-160-024 $14.94SFR 172-160-027 $14.94SFR 172-160-028 $14.94SFR 172-160-029 $14.94SFR 172-160-030 $14.94SFR 172-160-031 $14.94SFR 172-260-001 $7.46CONDO 172-260-002 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 172-260-003 $7.46CONDO 172-260-004 $7.46CONDO 172-260-005 $7.46CONDO 172-260-006 $7.46CONDO 172-260-007 $7.46CONDO 172-260-008 $7.46CONDO 172-260-009 $7.46CONDO 172-260-010 $7.46CONDO 172-260-011 $7.46CONDO 172-260-012 $7.46CONDO 172-260-013 $7.46CONDO 172-260-014 $7.46CONDO 172-260-015 $7.46CONDO 172-260-016 $7.46CONDO 172-260-017 $7.46CONDO 172-260-018 $7.46CONDO 172-260-019 $7.46CONDO 172-260-020 $7.46CONDO 172-260-021 $7.46CONDO 172-260-022 $7.46CONDO 172-260-023 $7.46CONDO 172-260-024 $7.46CONDO 172-260-025 $7.46CONDO 172-260-026 $7.46CONDO 172-260-027 $7.46CONDO 172-260-028 $7.46CONDO 172-260-029 $7.46CONDO 172-260-030 $7.46CONDO 172-260-031 $7.46CONDO 172-260-032 $7.46CONDO 172-260-033 $7.46CONDO 172-260-034 $7.46CONDO 172-260-035 $7.46CONDO 172-260-036 $7.46CONDO 172-260-037 $7.46CONDO 172-260-038 $7.46CONDO 172-260-039 $7.46CONDO 172-260-040 $7.46CONDO 172-260-041 $7.46CONDO 172-260-042 $7.46CONDO 172-260-043 $7.46CONDO 172-260-044 $7.46CONDO 172-260-045 $7.46CONDO 172-260-046 $7.46CONDO 172-260-047 $7.46CONDO 172-260-048 $7.46CONDO 172-260-049 $7.46CONDO 172-260-050 $7.46CONDO 172-260-051 $7.46CONDO 172-260-052 $7.46CONDO 172-260-053 $7.46CONDO 172-260-054 $7.46CONDO - 92 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 172-260-055 $7.46CONDO 172-260-056 $7.46CONDO 172-260-057 $7.46CONDO 172-260-058 $7.46CONDO 172-260-059 $7.46CONDO 172-260-060 $7.46CONDO 172-260-061 $7.46CONDO 172-260-062 $7.46CONDO 172-260-063 $7.46CONDO 172-260-064 $7.46CONDO 172-260-065 $7.46CONDO 172-260-066 $7.46CONDO 172-260-067 $7.46CONDO 172-260-068 $7.46CONDO 172-260-069 $7.46CONDO 172-260-070 $7.46CONDO 172-260-071 $7.46CONDO 172-260-072 $7.46CONDO 172-260-073 $7.46CONDO 172-260-074 $7.46CONDO 172-260-075 $7.46CONDO 172-260-076 $7.46CONDO 172-260-077 $7.46CONDO 172-260-078 $7.46CONDO 172-260-079 $7.46CONDO 172-260-080 $7.46CONDO 172-260-081 $7.46CONDO 172-290-001 $7.46CONDO 172-290-002 $7.46CONDO 172-290-003 $7.46CONDO 172-290-004 $7.46CONDO 172-290-005 $7.46CONDO 172-290-006 $7.46CONDO 172-290-007 $7.46CONDO 172-290-008 $7.46CONDO 172-290-009 $7.46CONDO 172-290-010 $7.46CONDO 172-290-011 $7.46CONDO 172-290-012 $7.46CONDO 172-290-013 $7.46CONDO 172-290-014 $7.46CONDO 172-290-015 $7.46CONDO 172-290-016 $7.46CONDO 172-290-017 $7.46CONDO 172-290-018 $7.46CONDO 172-290-019 $7.46CONDO 172-290-020 $7.46CONDO 172-290-021 $7.46CONDO 172-290-022 $7.46CONDO 172-290-023 $7.46CONDO 172-290-024 $7.46CONDO 172-290-025 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 172-290-026 $7.46CONDO 172-290-027 $7.46CONDO 172-290-028 $7.46CONDO 172-290-029 $7.46CONDO 172-290-030 $7.46CONDO 172-290-031 $7.46CONDO 172-290-032 $7.46CONDO 172-290-033 $7.46CONDO 172-290-034 $7.46CONDO 172-290-035 $7.46CONDO 172-290-036 $7.46CONDO 172-290-037 $7.46CONDO 172-290-038 $7.46CONDO 172-290-049 $7.46CONDO 172-290-050 $7.46CONDO 172-290-051 $7.46CONDO 172-290-052 $7.46CONDO 172-290-053 $7.46CONDO 172-290-054 $7.46CONDO 172-290-055 $7.46CONDO 172-290-056 $7.46CONDO 172-290-057 $7.46CONDO 172-290-058 $7.46CONDO 172-290-059 $7.46CONDO 172-290-060 $7.46CONDO 172-290-061 $7.46CONDO 172-290-062 $7.46CONDO 172-290-063 $7.46CONDO 172-290-064 $7.46CONDO 172-290-065 $7.46CONDO 172-290-066 $7.46CONDO 172-290-067 $7.46CONDO 172-290-068 $7.46CONDO 172-290-069 $7.46CONDO 172-290-070 $7.46CONDO 172-290-071 $7.46CONDO 172-290-072 $7.46CONDO 172-290-073 $7.46CONDO 172-290-074 $7.46CONDO 172-290-075 $7.46CONDO 172-290-076 $7.46CONDO 172-290-077 $7.46CONDO 172-290-078 $7.46CONDO 172-290-079 $7.46CONDO 172-290-080 $7.46CONDO 172-290-081 $7.46CONDO 172-290-082 $7.46CONDO 172-290-083 $7.46CONDO 172-290-084 $7.46CONDO 172-290-085 $7.46CONDO 172-290-086 $7.46CONDO 172-290-087 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 172-290-088 $7.46CONDO 172-290-089 $7.46CONDO 172-290-090 $7.46CONDO 172-290-091 $7.46CONDO 172-290-092 $7.46CONDO 172-290-093 $7.46CONDO 172-290-094 $7.46CONDO 172-290-095 $7.46CONDO 172-290-096 $7.46CONDO 172-290-097 $7.46CONDO 172-290-098 $7.46CONDO 172-290-099 $7.46CONDO 172-290-100 $7.46CONDO 172-290-101 $7.46CONDO 172-290-102 $7.46CONDO 172-300-001 $7.46CONDO 172-300-002 $7.46CONDO 172-300-003 $7.46CONDO 172-300-004 $7.46CONDO 172-300-005 $7.46CONDO 172-300-006 $7.46CONDO 172-300-007 $7.46CONDO 172-300-008 $7.46CONDO 172-300-009 $7.46CONDO 172-300-010 $7.46CONDO 172-300-011 $7.46CONDO 172-300-012 $7.46CONDO 172-300-013 $7.46CONDO 172-300-014 $7.46CONDO 172-300-015 $7.46CONDO 172-300-016 $7.46CONDO 172-300-017 $7.46CONDO 172-300-018 $7.46CONDO 172-300-019 $7.46CONDO 172-300-020 $7.46CONDO 172-300-021 $7.46CONDO 172-300-022 $7.46CONDO 172-300-023 $7.46CONDO 172-300-024 $7.46CONDO 172-300-025 $7.46CONDO 172-300-026 $7.46CONDO 172-300-027 $7.46CONDO 172-300-028 $7.46CONDO 172-300-029 $7.46CONDO 172-300-030 $7.46CONDO 172-300-031 $7.46CONDO 172-300-032 $7.46CONDO 172-300-033 $7.46CONDO 172-300-034 $7.46CONDO 172-300-035 $7.46CONDO 172-300-036 $7.46CONDO 172-300-037 $7.46CONDO - 93 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 172-300-038 $7.46CONDO 172-300-039 $7.46CONDO 172-300-040 $7.46CONDO 172-300-041 $7.46CONDO 172-300-042 $7.46CONDO 172-300-043 $7.46CONDO 172-300-044 $7.46CONDO 172-300-045 $7.46CONDO 172-300-046 $7.46CONDO 172-300-047 $7.46CONDO 172-300-048 $7.46CONDO 172-300-049 $7.46CONDO 172-310-038 $7.46CONDO 172-310-039 $7.46CONDO 172-310-040 $7.46CONDO 172-310-041 $7.46CONDO 172-310-042 $7.46CONDO 172-310-043 $7.46CONDO 172-310-044 $7.46CONDO 172-310-045 $7.46CONDO 172-310-046 $7.46CONDO 172-310-047 $7.46CONDO 172-310-049 $7.46CONDO 172-310-050 $7.46CONDO 172-310-051 $7.46CONDO 172-310-052 $7.46CONDO 172-310-053 $7.46CONDO 172-310-054 $7.46CONDO 172-310-055 $7.46CONDO 172-310-056 $7.46CONDO 172-310-057 $7.46CONDO 172-310-058 $7.46CONDO 172-310-059 $7.46CONDO 172-310-060 $7.46CONDO 172-310-061 $7.46CONDO 172-310-062 $7.46CONDO 172-310-063 $7.46CONDO 172-310-064 $7.46CONDO 172-310-065 $7.46CONDO 172-310-066 $7.46CONDO 172-310-067 $7.46CONDO 172-310-068 $7.46CONDO 172-310-069 $7.46CONDO 172-310-070 $7.46CONDO 172-310-071 $7.46CONDO 172-310-072 $7.46CONDO 172-310-073 $7.46CONDO 172-310-074 $7.46CONDO 172-310-075 $7.46CONDO 172-310-076 $7.46CONDO 172-310-077 $7.46CONDO 172-310-078 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 172-310-079 $7.46CONDO 172-310-080 $7.46CONDO 172-310-081 $7.46CONDO 172-310-082 $7.46CONDO 172-310-083 $7.46CONDO 172-310-084 $7.46CONDO 172-310-085 $7.46CONDO 172-310-086 $7.46CONDO 172-310-087 $7.46CONDO 172-310-088 $7.46CONDO 172-310-089 $7.46CONDO 172-310-090 $7.46CONDO 172-310-091 $7.46CONDO 172-310-092 $7.46CONDO 172-310-093 $7.46CONDO 172-310-094 $7.46CONDO 172-310-095 $7.46CONDO 172-310-096 $7.46CONDO 172-310-097 $7.46CONDO 172-310-098 $7.46CONDO 172-310-099 $7.46CONDO 172-310-100 $7.46CONDO 172-310-101 $7.46CONDO 172-310-102 $7.46CONDO 172-310-103 $7.46CONDO 172-310-104 $7.46CONDO 172-310-105 $7.46CONDO 172-310-106 $7.46CONDO 172-310-107 $7.46CONDO 172-310-109 $7.46CONDO 172-310-110 $7.46CONDO 172-310-111 $7.46CONDO 172-310-112 $7.46CONDO 172-310-113 $7.46CONDO 172-310-114 $7.46CONDO 172-310-115 $7.46CONDO 172-310-116 $7.46CONDO 172-310-117 $7.46CONDO 172-310-118 $7.46CONDO 172-310-119 $7.46CONDO 172-310-120 $7.46CONDO 172-310-121 $7.46CONDO 172-310-122 $7.46CONDO 172-310-123 $7.46CONDO 172-310-124 $7.46CONDO 172-310-125 $7.46CONDO 172-310-126 $7.46CONDO 172-310-127 $7.46CONDO 172-310-128 $7.46CONDO 172-310-129 $7.46CONDO 172-310-130 $7.46CONDO 172-310-131 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 172-310-132 $7.46CONDO 172-310-133 $7.46CONDO 172-310-134 $7.46CONDO 172-310-135 $7.46CONDO 172-310-136 $7.46CONDO 172-310-137 $7.46CONDO 172-310-138 $7.46CONDO 172-310-139 $7.46CONDO 172-310-140 $7.46CONDO 172-310-141 $7.46CONDO 172-310-142 $7.46CONDO 172-310-143 $7.46CONDO 172-310-144 $7.46CONDO 172-310-145 $7.46CONDO 172-310-146 $7.46CONDO 172-310-147 $7.46CONDO 172-310-148 $7.46CONDO 172-310-149 $7.46CONDO 172-310-150 $7.46CONDO 172-320-001 $7.46CONDO 172-320-002 $7.46CONDO 172-320-003 $7.46CONDO 172-320-004 $7.46CONDO 172-320-005 $7.46CONDO 172-320-006 $7.46CONDO 172-320-007 $7.46CONDO 172-320-008 $7.46CONDO 172-320-009 $7.46CONDO 172-320-010 $7.46CONDO 172-320-011 $7.46CONDO 172-320-012 $7.46CONDO 172-320-013 $7.46CONDO 172-320-014 $7.46CONDO 172-320-015 $7.46CONDO 172-320-016 $7.46CONDO 172-320-017 $7.46CONDO 172-320-018 $7.46CONDO 172-320-019 $7.46CONDO 172-320-020 $7.46CONDO 172-320-021 $7.46CONDO 172-320-022 $7.46CONDO 172-320-023 $7.46CONDO 172-320-024 $7.46CONDO 172-320-025 $7.46CONDO 172-320-026 $7.46CONDO 172-320-027 $7.46CONDO 172-320-028 $7.46CONDO 172-320-029 $7.46CONDO 172-320-030 $7.46CONDO 172-320-031 $7.46CONDO 172-320-032 $7.46CONDO 172-320-033 $7.46CONDO - 94 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 172-320-034 $7.46CONDO 172-320-035 $7.46CONDO 172-320-036 $7.46CONDO 172-320-037 $7.46CONDO 172-320-038 $7.46CONDO 172-320-039 $7.46CONDO 172-320-040 $7.46CONDO 172-320-041 $7.46CONDO 172-320-042 $7.46CONDO 172-320-043 $7.46CONDO 172-320-044 $7.46CONDO 172-320-045 $7.46CONDO 172-320-046 $7.46CONDO 172-320-047 $7.46CONDO 172-320-048 $7.46CONDO 172-320-049 $7.46CONDO 172-320-050 $7.46CONDO 172-320-051 $7.46CONDO 172-320-052 $7.46CONDO 172-320-053 $7.46CONDO 172-320-054 $7.46CONDO 172-320-055 $7.46CONDO 172-320-056 $7.46CONDO 172-320-057 $7.46CONDO 172-320-058 $7.46CONDO 172-320-059 $7.46CONDO 172-320-060 $7.46CONDO 172-320-061 $7.46CONDO 172-320-062 $7.46CONDO 172-320-063 $7.46CONDO 172-320-064 $7.46CONDO 172-320-065 $7.46CONDO 172-320-066 $7.46CONDO 172-320-067 $7.46CONDO 172-320-068 $7.46CONDO 172-320-069 $7.46CONDO 172-320-070 $7.46CONDO 172-320-071 $7.46CONDO 172-320-072 $7.46CONDO 172-320-073 $7.46CONDO 172-320-074 $7.46CONDO 172-320-075 $7.46CONDO 172-320-076 $7.46CONDO 172-320-077 $7.46CONDO 172-320-078 $7.46CONDO 174-102-010 $14.94SFR 174-102-011 $14.94SFR 174-102-012 $14.94SFR 174-102-013 $14.94SFR 174-102-014 $14.94SFR 174-102-015 $14.94SFR 174-102-016 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 174-102-017 $14.94SFR 174-102-018 $14.94SFR 174-102-019 $14.94SFR 175-143-026 $14.94SFR 175-143-027 $14.94SFR 175-143-028 $14.94SFR 175-260-001 $14.94SFR 175-260-002 $14.94SFR 175-260-003 $14.94SFR 175-260-004 $14.94SFR 175-260-005 $14.94SFR 175-260-006 $14.94SFR 175-260-007 $14.94SFR 175-260-008 $14.94SFR 175-260-009 $14.94SFR 175-260-010 $14.94SFR 175-260-011 $14.94SFR 175-260-012 $14.94SFR 175-260-013 $14.94SFR 175-260-014 $14.94SFR 175-260-015 $14.94SFR 175-260-016 $14.94SFR 175-260-017 $14.94SFR 175-260-018 $14.94SFR 175-260-019 $14.94SFR 175-260-020 $14.94SFR 175-260-021 $14.94SFR 175-260-022 $14.94SFR 175-260-023 $14.94SFR 175-260-024 $14.94SFR 175-260-025 $14.94SFR 175-260-026 $14.94SFR 175-260-027 $14.94SFR 175-260-028 $14.94SFR 175-260-029 $14.94SFR 175-260-030 $14.94SFR 175-260-031 $14.94SFR 175-260-032 $14.94SFR 175-260-033 $14.94SFR 175-260-034 $14.94SFR 175-260-035 $14.94SFR 175-260-036 $14.94SFR 175-350-001 $14.94SFR 175-350-002 $14.94SFR 175-350-003 $14.94SFR 175-350-004 $14.94SFR 175-350-005 $14.94SFR 175-350-006 $14.94SFR 175-350-007 $14.94SFR 175-350-008 $14.94SFR 175-350-009 $14.94SFR 175-350-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 175-350-011 $14.94SFR 175-350-012 $14.94SFR 175-350-013 $14.94SFR 175-350-014 $14.94SFR 175-350-015 $14.94SFR 175-350-016 $14.94SFR 175-350-017 $14.94SFR 175-350-018 $14.94SFR 175-350-019 $14.94SFR 175-350-020 $14.94SFR 175-350-021 $14.94SFR 175-350-022 $14.94SFR 175-350-023 $14.94SFR 175-350-024 $14.94SFR 175-350-025 $14.94SFR 175-350-026 $14.94SFR 175-350-027 $14.94SFR 175-350-028 $14.94SFR 175-350-029 $14.94SFR 175-350-030 $14.94SFR 177-140-001 $7.46VSFR 177-140-026 $74.70COM 177-140-051 $74.70COM 177-140-057 $74.70COM 177-182-005 $74.70INST 177-210-046 $14.94SFR 177-210-047 $14.94SFR 177-210-048 $14.94SFR 177-210-049 $14.94SFR 177-210-050 $14.94SFR 177-210-051 $14.94SFR 177-210-052 $14.94SFR 177-210-054 $14.94SFR 177-210-055 $14.94SFR 177-210-056 $14.94SFR 177-210-068 $14.94SFR 177-210-069 $14.94SFR 177-220-022 $14.94SFR 177-220-023 $14.94SFR 177-220-024 $14.94SFR 177-220-026 $14.94SFR 177-220-027 $14.94SFR 177-220-028 $14.94SFR 180-070-039 $14.94SFR 180-070-040 $14.94SFR 180-150-011 $14.94SFR 180-150-012 $14.94SFR 180-150-013 $14.94SFR 180-150-014 $14.94SFR 180-150-015 $14.94SFR 180-150-016 $14.94SFR 180-150-017 $14.94SFR - 95 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 180-150-018 $14.94SFR 180-150-020 $14.94SFR 180-150-021 $14.94SFR 180-150-022 $14.94SFR 180-150-023 $14.94SFR 180-150-024 $14.94SFR 180-150-025 $14.94SFR 180-150-028 $14.94SFR 180-160-014 $14.94SFR 180-160-015 $14.94SFR 180-160-016 $14.94SFR 180-160-017 $14.94SFR 180-160-018 $14.94SFR 180-160-019 $14.94SFR 180-160-020 $14.94SFR 180-160-021 $14.94SFR 180-160-022 $14.94SFR 180-160-023 $14.94SFR 180-160-024 $14.94SFR 180-160-025 $14.94SFR 180-160-026 $14.94SFR 180-160-027 $14.94SFR 180-160-028 $14.94SFR 180-160-029 $14.94SFR 180-160-030 $14.94SFR 180-180-015 $14.94SFR 180-180-016 $14.94SFR 180-180-020 $14.94SFR 180-180-021 $14.94SFR 180-180-022 $14.94SFR 180-180-023 $14.94SFR 180-180-024 $14.94SFR 180-180-025 $14.94SFR 180-180-026 $14.94SFR 180-180-027 $14.94SFR 180-180-028 $14.94SFR 180-180-029 $14.94SFR 180-180-030 $14.94SFR 180-180-031 $14.94SFR 180-180-032 $14.94SFR 180-180-033 $14.94SFR 180-180-034 $14.94SFR 180-180-035 $14.94SFR 180-180-036 $14.94SFR 180-180-037 $14.94SFR 180-310-069 $14.94SFR 180-310-070 $14.94SFR 180-310-071 $14.94SFR 180-310-072 $14.94SFR 180-321-012 $14.94SFR 180-321-013 $14.94SFR 180-321-014 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 180-321-015 $14.94SFR 180-321-016 $14.94SFR 180-321-017 $14.94SFR 180-321-018 $14.94SFR 180-321-019 $14.94SFR 180-321-020 $14.94SFR 180-321-022 $14.94SFR 180-321-023 $14.94SFR 180-321-024 $14.94SFR 180-321-025 $14.94SFR 180-321-026 $14.94SFR 180-321-027 $14.94SFR 180-321-028 $14.94SFR 180-321-029 $14.94SFR 180-321-030 $14.94SFR 180-321-031 $14.94SFR 180-321-032 $14.94SFR 180-321-033 $14.94SFR 180-321-034 $14.94SFR 180-321-035 $14.94SFR 180-321-036 $14.94SFR 180-321-037 $14.94SFR 180-321-038 $14.94SFR 180-321-041 $14.94SFR 180-321-042 $14.94SFR 180-321-043 $14.94SFR 180-321-044 $14.94SFR 180-321-045 $14.94SFR 182-140-050 $14.94SFR 182-140-051 $14.94SFR 182-140-058 $14.94SFR 182-140-059 $14.94SFR 182-150-045 $14.94SFR 182-150-046 $14.94SFR 183-172-007 $14.94SFR 183-172-008 $14.94SFR 183-172-009 $14.94SFR 183-172-010 $14.94SFR 183-370-013 $14.94SFR 183-370-014 $14.94SFR 183-370-015 $14.94SFR 183-370-016 $14.94SFR 183-370-017 $14.94SFR 183-370-018 $14.94SFR 183-370-019 $14.94SFR 183-370-020 $14.94SFR 184-010-055 $74.70COM 184-010-056 $74.70COM 184-010-059 $14.94SFR 184-010-060 $29.88MFR2 184-010-061 $29.88MFR2 184-010-062 $29.88MFR2 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 184-010-063 $29.88MFR2 184-010-066 $29.88MFR2 184-010-067 $29.88MFR2 184-010-068 $29.88MFR2 184-010-069 $29.88MFR2 184-010-070 $29.88MFR2 184-010-073 $14.94SFR 184-010-074 $29.88MFR2 184-100-034 $14.94SFR 184-100-035 $14.94SFR 184-100-036 $14.94SFR 184-100-037 $14.94SFR 184-100-038 $14.94SFR 184-100-039 $14.94SFR 184-100-040 $14.94SFR 184-100-041 $14.94SFR 184-100-042 $14.94SFR 184-100-043 $14.94SFR 184-100-044 $14.94SFR 184-100-045 $14.94SFR 184-100-046 $14.94SFR 184-100-047 $14.94SFR 184-100-048 $14.94SFR 184-100-049 $14.94SFR 184-100-050 $7.46VSFR 184-100-051 $14.94SFR 184-100-052 $14.94SFR 184-100-053 $14.94SFR 184-110-096 $7.46VSFR 184-110-097 $14.94SFR 184-110-098 $14.94SFR 184-110-099 $7.46VSFR 184-130-010 $14.94SFR 184-130-011 $14.94SFR 184-130-012 $14.94SFR 184-150-029 $14.94SFR 184-150-034 $14.94SFR 184-150-035 $14.94SFR 184-150-036 $14.94SFR 184-150-037 $14.94SFR 184-150-059 $14.94SFR 184-150-060 $14.94SFR 184-161-006 $14.94SFR 184-161-009 $7.46VSFR 184-162-031 $14.94SFR 184-162-032 $14.94SFR 184-211-032 $14.94SFR 184-252-013 $14.94SFR 184-252-014 $14.94SFR 184-252-015 $14.94SFR 184-301-026 $14.94SFR 184-301-029 $14.94SFR - 96 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 184-301-030 $14.94SFR 184-311-005 $14.94SFR 184-311-006 $14.94SFR 184-311-022 $74.70COM 184-311-029 $74.70COM 184-311-030 $7.46VCOM 184-311-031 $14.94SFR 184-311-032 $14.94SFR 184-312-021 $74.70COM 184-312-026 $14.94SFR 184-312-034 $74.70COM 184-312-035 $74.70COM 184-312-036 $74.70COM 184-331-033 $74.70INST 184-352-025 $14.94SFR 184-352-026 $14.94SFR 184-352-027 $14.94SFR 184-352-028 $14.94SFR 184-352-029 $14.94SFR 184-450-008 $14.94SFR 184-450-009 $14.94SFR 184-450-010 $14.94SFR 184-450-011 $14.94SFR 184-450-020 $14.94SFR 184-450-021 $14.94SFR 184-450-022 $14.94SFR 184-450-023 $14.94SFR 184-450-024 $104.58MFR7 184-450-025 $74.70COM 184-450-035 $14.94SFR 184-450-036 $14.94SFR 184-450-038 $74.70INST 184-450-039 $74.70INST 184-450-040 $74.70INST 184-480-001 $7.46CONDO 184-480-002 $7.46CONDO 184-480-003 $7.46CONDO 184-480-004 $7.46CONDO 184-480-005 $7.46CONDO 184-480-006 $7.46CONDO 184-480-007 $7.46CONDO 184-480-008 $7.46CONDO 184-480-009 $7.46CONDO 184-480-010 $7.46CONDO 184-480-011 $7.46CONDO 184-480-012 $7.46CONDO 184-480-013 $7.46CONDO 184-480-014 $7.46CONDO 184-480-015 $7.46CONDO 184-480-016 $7.46CONDO 184-480-017 $7.46CONDO 184-480-018 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 184-480-019 $7.46CONDO 184-480-020 $7.46CONDO 184-480-021 $7.46CONDO 184-480-022 $7.46CONDO 184-480-023 $7.46CONDO 184-480-024 $7.46CONDO 184-510-001 $7.46CONDO 184-510-002 $7.46CONDO 184-510-003 $7.46CONDO 184-510-004 $7.46CONDO 184-510-005 $7.46CONDO 184-510-006 $7.46CONDO 184-510-007 $7.46CONDO 184-510-008 $7.46CONDO 184-510-009 $7.46CONDO 184-510-010 $7.46CONDO 184-510-011 $7.46CONDO 184-510-012 $7.46CONDO 184-510-013 $7.46CONDO 184-510-014 $7.46CONDO 184-510-015 $7.46CONDO 184-510-016 $7.46CONDO 184-510-017 $7.46CONDO 184-510-018 $7.46CONDO 184-510-019 $7.46CONDO 184-510-020 $7.46CONDO 184-510-021 $7.46CONDO 184-510-022 $7.46CONDO 184-510-023 $7.46CONDO 184-510-024 $7.46CONDO 184-510-025 $7.46CONDO 184-510-026 $7.46CONDO 184-510-027 $7.46CONDO 184-510-028 $7.46CONDO 184-510-029 $7.46CONDO 184-510-030 $7.46CONDO 184-510-031 $7.46CONDO 184-510-032 $7.46CONDO 184-510-033 $7.46CONDO 184-510-034 $7.46CONDO 184-510-035 $7.46CONDO 184-510-036 $7.46CONDO 184-510-037 $7.46CONDO 184-510-038 $7.46CONDO 184-510-039 $7.46CONDO 184-510-040 $7.46CONDO 184-510-041 $7.46CONDO 184-510-042 $7.46CONDO 184-510-043 $7.46CONDO 184-510-044 $7.46CONDO 184-510-045 $7.46CONDO 184-510-046 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 184-510-047 $7.46CONDO 184-510-048 $7.46CONDO 184-510-049 $7.46CONDO 184-510-050 $7.46CONDO 184-510-051 $7.46CONDO 184-510-052 $7.46CONDO 184-510-053 $7.46CONDO 184-510-054 $7.46CONDO 184-510-055 $7.46CONDO 184-510-056 $7.46CONDO 184-510-057 $7.46CONDO 184-560-001 $7.46CONDO 184-560-002 $7.46CONDO 184-560-003 $7.46CONDO 184-560-004 $7.46CONDO 184-560-005 $7.46CONDO 184-560-006 $7.46CONDO 184-560-007 $7.46CONDO 184-560-008 $7.46CONDO 184-560-009 $7.46CONDO 184-560-010 $7.46CONDO 184-560-011 $7.46CONDO 184-560-012 $7.46CONDO 184-560-013 $7.46CONDO 184-560-014 $7.46CONDO 184-560-015 $7.46CONDO 184-560-016 $7.46CONDO 184-560-017 $7.46CONDO 184-560-018 $7.46CONDO 184-560-019 $7.46CONDO 184-560-020 $7.46CONDO 184-560-021 $7.46CONDO 184-560-022 $7.46CONDO 184-560-023 $7.46CONDO 184-560-024 $7.46CONDO 184-560-025 $7.46CONDO 184-560-026 $7.46CONDO 184-560-027 $7.46CONDO 184-560-028 $7.46CONDO 184-560-029 $7.46CONDO 184-560-030 $7.46CONDO 184-560-031 $7.46CONDO 184-560-032 $7.46CONDO 184-560-033 $7.46CONDO 184-560-034 $7.46CONDO 184-560-035 $7.46CONDO 184-560-036 $7.46CONDO 184-560-037 $7.46CONDO 184-560-038 $7.46CONDO 184-560-039 $7.46CONDO 184-560-040 $7.46CONDO 184-560-041 $7.46CONDO - 97 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 184-560-042 $7.46CONDO 184-560-043 $7.46CONDO 184-560-044 $7.46CONDO 184-560-045 $7.46CONDO 184-560-046 $7.46CONDO 184-560-047 $7.46CONDO 184-560-048 $7.46CONDO 184-560-049 $7.46CONDO 184-560-050 $7.46CONDO 184-560-051 $7.46CONDO 184-560-052 $7.46CONDO 184-560-053 $7.46CONDO 184-560-054 $7.46CONDO 184-560-055 $7.46CONDO 184-560-056 $7.46CONDO 184-560-057 $7.46CONDO 184-560-058 $7.46CONDO 184-560-059 $7.46CONDO 184-560-060 $7.46CONDO 184-560-061 $7.46CONDO 184-560-062 $7.46CONDO 184-560-063 $7.46CONDO 184-560-064 $7.46CONDO 184-560-065 $7.46CONDO 184-560-066 $7.46CONDO 184-560-067 $7.46CONDO 184-560-068 $7.46CONDO 184-560-069 $7.46CONDO 184-560-070 $7.46CONDO 184-560-071 $7.46CONDO 184-560-072 $7.46CONDO 184-560-073 $7.46CONDO 184-560-074 $7.46CONDO 184-560-075 $7.46CONDO 184-560-076 $7.46CONDO 184-560-077 $7.46CONDO 184-560-078 $7.46CONDO 184-560-079 $7.46CONDO 184-560-080 $7.46CONDO 184-560-081 $7.46CONDO 184-560-082 $7.46CONDO 184-560-083 $7.46CONDO 184-560-084 $7.46CONDO 184-560-085 $7.46CONDO 184-560-086 $7.46CONDO 184-560-087 $7.46CONDO 184-560-088 $7.46CONDO 184-560-089 $7.46CONDO 184-560-090 $7.46CONDO 184-560-091 $7.46CONDO 184-560-092 $7.46CONDO 184-560-093 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 184-560-094 $7.46CONDO 184-560-095 $7.46CONDO 184-560-096 $7.46CONDO 184-560-097 $7.46CONDO 184-560-098 $7.46CONDO 184-560-099 $7.46CONDO 184-560-100 $7.46CONDO 184-560-101 $7.46CONDO 184-560-102 $7.46CONDO 184-560-103 $7.46CONDO 184-560-104 $7.46CONDO 184-560-105 $7.46CONDO 184-590-001 $7.46CONDO 184-590-002 $7.46CONDO 184-590-003 $7.46CONDO 184-590-004 $7.46CONDO 184-590-005 $7.46CONDO 184-590-006 $7.46CONDO 184-590-007 $7.46CONDO 184-590-008 $7.46CONDO 184-590-009 $7.46CONDO 184-590-010 $7.46CONDO 184-590-011 $7.46CONDO 184-590-012 $7.46CONDO 184-590-013 $7.46CONDO 184-590-014 $7.46CONDO 185-230-042 $74.70COM 185-250-035 $14.94SFR 185-250-036 $14.94SFR 185-250-037 $14.94SFR 185-250-038 $14.94SFR 185-250-039 $14.94SFR 185-360-053 $14.94SFR 185-360-054 $14.94SFR 185-360-055 $14.94SFR 185-360-056 $14.94SFR 185-360-057 $14.94SFR 185-360-058 $14.94SFR 185-360-059 $14.94SFR 185-360-060 $14.94SFR 185-360-061 $14.94SFR 185-360-062 $14.94SFR 185-360-064 $14.94SFR 185-360-065 $14.94SFR 185-360-066 $14.94SFR 185-360-067 $14.94SFR 185-360-068 $14.94SFR 185-360-069 $14.94SFR 185-360-070 $14.94SFR 185-360-071 $14.94SFR 185-360-072 $14.94SFR 185-360-073 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 185-360-074 $14.94SFR 185-360-075 $14.94SFR 185-370-001 $74.70IND 185-370-023 $74.70IND 185-370-033 $7.46VMFR 185-370-036 $7.46VCOM 185-470-001 $7.46CONDO 185-470-002 $7.46CONDO 185-470-003 $7.46CONDO 185-470-004 $7.46CONDO 185-470-005 $7.46CONDO 185-470-006 $7.46CONDO 185-470-007 $7.46CONDO 185-470-008 $7.46CONDO 185-470-009 $7.46CONDO 185-470-010 $7.46CONDO 185-470-011 $7.46CONDO 185-470-012 $7.46CONDO 185-470-013 $7.46CONDO 185-470-014 $7.46CONDO 185-470-015 $7.46CONDO 185-470-017 $7.46CONDO 185-470-018 $7.46CONDO 185-470-019 $7.46CONDO 185-470-020 $7.46CONDO 185-470-022 $7.46CONDO 185-470-023 $7.46CONDO 185-470-024 $7.46CONDO 185-470-025 $7.46CONDO 185-470-028 $7.46CONDO 185-470-029 $7.46CONDO 186-011-014 $74.70COM 186-011-028 $74.70COM 186-011-029 $74.70COM 186-011-030 $74.70COM 186-011-032 $74.70COM 186-020-015 $14.94SFR 186-020-016 $14.94SFR 186-020-017 $14.94SFR 186-020-024 $7.46VSFR 186-020-025 $7.46VSFR 186-290-001 $7.46CONDO 186-290-002 $7.46CONDO 186-290-003 $7.46CONDO 186-290-004 $7.46CONDO 186-290-005 $7.46CONDO 186-290-006 $7.46CONDO 186-290-007 $7.46CONDO 186-290-008 $7.46CONDO 186-290-009 $7.46CONDO 186-290-010 $7.46CONDO 186-290-011 $7.46CONDO - 98 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 186-290-012 $7.46CONDO 186-330-001 $7.46CONDO 186-330-002 $7.46CONDO 186-330-003 $7.46CONDO 186-330-004 $7.46CONDO 186-330-005 $7.46CONDO 186-330-006 $7.46CONDO 186-330-007 $7.46CONDO 186-330-008 $7.46CONDO 186-330-009 $7.46CONDO 186-330-010 $7.46CONDO 186-330-011 $7.46CONDO 186-330-012 $7.46CONDO 186-330-013 $7.46CONDO 186-330-014 $7.46CONDO 186-330-015 $7.46CONDO 186-330-016 $7.46CONDO 186-330-017 $7.46CONDO 186-330-018 $7.46CONDO 186-330-019 $7.46CONDO 186-330-020 $7.46CONDO 186-330-021 $7.46CONDO 186-330-022 $7.46CONDO 186-330-023 $7.46CONDO 186-330-024 $7.46CONDO 186-330-025 $7.46CONDO 186-330-026 $7.46CONDO 186-330-027 $7.46CONDO 186-330-028 $7.46CONDO 187-130-016 $14.94SFR 187-130-018 $14.94SFR 187-130-019 $14.94SFR 187-130-021 $14.94SFR 187-171-027 $14.94SFR 187-171-028 $14.94SFR 187-171-029 $14.94SFR 187-171-030 $14.94SFR 187-171-031 $14.94SFR 187-171-032 $14.94SFR 187-171-033 $14.94SFR 187-171-035 $14.94SFR 187-171-036 $14.94SFR 187-171-037 $14.94SFR 187-171-038 $14.94SFR 187-171-039 $14.94SFR 187-171-042 $14.94SFR 187-171-043 $14.94SFR 187-171-044 $14.94SFR 187-171-045 $14.94SFR 187-171-046 $14.94SFR 187-171-047 $14.94SFR 187-171-051 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 187-171-052 $14.94SFR 187-171-053 $14.94SFR 187-171-054 $14.94SFR 187-171-055 $14.94SFR 187-171-056 $14.94SFR 187-171-058 $7.46CONDO 187-171-059 $7.46CONDO 187-171-060 $7.46CONDO 187-171-061 $7.46CONDO 187-171-062 $7.46CONDO 187-171-063 $7.46CONDO 187-171-064 $7.46CONDO 187-171-065 $7.46CONDO 187-171-066 $14.94SFR 187-231-034 $14.94SFR 187-231-035 $14.94SFR 187-240-069 $14.94SFR 187-240-070 $14.94SFR 187-430-001 $14.94SFR 187-430-002 $14.94SFR 187-430-003 $14.94SFR 187-430-004 $14.94SFR 187-430-005 $14.94SFR 187-430-006 $14.94SFR 187-430-007 $14.94SFR 187-430-008 $14.94SFR 187-430-009 $14.94SFR 187-430-010 $14.94SFR 187-430-011 $14.94SFR 187-430-012 $29.88MFR2 187-430-013 $14.94SFR 187-430-014 $14.94SFR 187-430-015 $14.94SFR 187-430-016 $14.94SFR 187-430-017 $14.94SFR 187-430-018 $14.94SFR 187-430-019 $14.94SFR 187-430-020 $14.94SFR 187-430-021 $14.94SFR 187-441-001 $14.94SFR 187-441-002 $14.94SFR 187-442-001 $14.94SFR 187-442-002 $14.94SFR 187-442-005 $14.94SFR 187-442-006 $14.94SFR 187-442-007 $14.94SFR 187-443-001 $14.94SFR 187-443-002 $14.94SFR 187-443-003 $14.94SFR 187-443-004 $14.94SFR 187-470-001 $14.94SFR 187-470-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 187-470-003 $14.94SFR 187-470-004 $14.94SFR 187-470-005 $14.94SFR 187-470-006 $14.94SFR 187-470-007 $14.94SFR 187-470-008 $14.94SFR 187-470-009 $14.94SFR 187-470-010 $14.94SFR 187-470-011 $14.94SFR 187-470-012 $14.94SFR 187-470-013 $14.94SFR 187-470-014 $14.94SFR 187-490-001 $14.94SFR 187-490-002 $14.94SFR 187-490-003 $14.94SFR 187-490-004 $14.94SFR 187-490-005 $14.94SFR 187-490-006 $14.94SFR 187-490-007 $14.94SFR 187-490-008 $14.94SFR 187-490-009 $14.94SFR 187-490-010 $14.94SFR 187-490-011 $14.94SFR 187-490-012 $14.94SFR 187-490-013 $14.94SFR 187-490-014 $14.94SFR 187-490-015 $14.94SFR 187-490-016 $14.94SFR 187-490-017 $14.94SFR 187-490-018 $14.94SFR 187-490-019 $14.94SFR 187-490-020 $14.94SFR 187-490-021 $14.94SFR 187-490-022 $14.94SFR 187-490-023 $14.94SFR 187-490-024 $14.94SFR 187-490-025 $14.94SFR 187-490-026 $14.94SFR 187-490-027 $14.94SFR 187-490-028 $14.94SFR 187-490-029 $14.94SFR 187-490-030 $14.94SFR 187-490-035 $14.94SFR 187-490-036 $14.94SFR 187-490-037 $14.94SFR 187-490-038 $14.94SFR 187-490-039 $14.94SFR 187-490-040 $14.94SFR 187-490-041 $14.94SFR 187-490-042 $14.94SFR 187-490-043 $14.94SFR 187-490-044 $14.94SFR - 99 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 187-490-045 $14.94SFR 187-490-046 $14.94SFR 187-490-047 $14.94SFR 187-490-048 $14.94SFR 187-490-049 $14.94SFR 187-490-050 $14.94SFR 187-490-051 $14.94SFR 187-490-052 $14.94SFR 187-490-053 $14.94SFR 187-490-054 $14.94SFR 187-490-055 $14.94SFR 187-490-056 $14.94SFR 187-490-057 $14.94SFR 187-490-058 $14.94SFR 187-490-059 $14.94SFR 187-490-060 $14.94SFR 187-490-061 $14.94SFR 187-490-062 $14.94SFR 187-490-063 $14.94SFR 187-500-001 $14.94SFR 187-500-002 $14.94SFR 187-500-003 $14.94SFR 187-500-004 $14.94SFR 187-500-005 $14.94SFR 187-500-006 $14.94SFR 187-500-007 $14.94SFR 187-500-008 $14.94SFR 187-500-009 $14.94SFR 187-500-010 $14.94SFR 187-500-011 $14.94SFR 187-500-012 $14.94SFR 187-500-013 $14.94SFR 187-500-014 $14.94SFR 187-500-015 $14.94SFR 187-500-016 $14.94SFR 187-500-017 $14.94SFR 187-500-018 $14.94SFR 187-500-019 $14.94SFR 187-500-020 $14.94SFR 187-500-021 $14.94SFR 187-500-022 $14.94SFR 187-500-023 $14.94SFR 187-500-024 $29.88MFR2 187-500-025 $14.94SFR 187-500-026 $14.94SFR 187-500-027 $14.94SFR 187-500-028 $14.94SFR 187-510-001 $14.94SFR 187-510-002 $14.94SFR 187-510-003 $14.94SFR 187-510-004 $14.94SFR 187-510-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 187-510-006 $14.94SFR 187-510-007 $14.94SFR 187-510-008 $14.94SFR 187-510-009 $14.94SFR 187-510-010 $14.94SFR 187-510-012 $14.94SFR 187-510-013 $14.94SFR 187-510-014 $14.94SFR 187-510-015 $14.94SFR 187-510-017 $14.94SFR 187-510-018 $14.94SFR 187-520-001 $14.94SFR 187-520-002 $14.94SFR 187-520-003 $14.94SFR 187-520-004 $14.94SFR 187-520-005 $14.94SFR 187-520-006 $14.94SFR 187-520-007 $14.94SFR 187-520-008 $14.94SFR 187-520-009 $14.94SFR 187-520-010 $14.94SFR 187-520-011 $14.94SFR 187-520-012 $14.94SFR 187-520-013 $14.94SFR 187-520-014 $14.94SFR 187-520-015 $14.94SFR 187-520-016 $14.94SFR 187-520-017 $14.94SFR 187-520-018 $14.94SFR 187-520-019 $14.94SFR 187-520-020 $14.94SFR 187-520-021 $14.94SFR 187-520-022 $14.94SFR 187-520-024 $14.94SFR 187-520-025 $14.94SFR 187-520-026 $14.94SFR 187-520-027 $14.94SFR 187-520-028 $14.94SFR 187-520-029 $14.94SFR 187-520-030 $14.94SFR 187-520-031 $14.94SFR 187-520-032 $14.94SFR 187-520-033 $14.94SFR 187-520-034 $14.94SFR 187-520-035 $14.94SFR 187-520-036 $14.94SFR 187-520-037 $14.94SFR 187-520-038 $14.94SFR 187-531-001 $14.94SFR 187-531-002 $14.94SFR 187-531-003 $14.94SFR 187-531-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 187-531-005 $14.94SFR 187-531-006 $14.94SFR 187-531-007 $14.94SFR 187-532-001 $14.94SFR 187-532-002 $14.94SFR 187-532-003 $14.94SFR 187-532-004 $14.94SFR 187-532-005 $14.94SFR 187-532-006 $14.94SFR 187-532-007 $14.94SFR 187-532-008 $14.94SFR 187-532-009 $14.94SFR 187-532-010 $14.94SFR 187-532-011 $14.94SFR 187-533-001 $14.94SFR 187-533-002 $14.94SFR 187-533-003 $14.94SFR 187-533-004 $14.94SFR 187-534-001 $14.94SFR 187-534-002 $14.94SFR 187-535-001 $14.94SFR 187-536-001 $14.94SFR 187-537-001 $14.94SFR 187-537-002 $14.94SFR 187-537-003 $14.94SFR 187-537-008 $14.94SFR 187-537-010 $14.94SFR 187-537-011 $14.94SFR 187-537-012 $14.94SFR 187-541-001 $14.94SFR 187-541-002 $14.94SFR 187-541-003 $14.94SFR 187-541-004 $14.94SFR 187-542-001 $14.94SFR 187-542-002 $14.94SFR 187-542-003 $14.94SFR 187-542-004 $14.94SFR 187-542-005 $14.94SFR 187-542-006 $14.94SFR 187-542-007 $14.94SFR 187-542-008 $14.94SFR 187-542-009 $14.94SFR 187-542-010 $14.94SFR 187-542-011 $14.94SFR 187-543-001 $14.94SFR 187-543-002 $14.94SFR 187-543-003 $14.94SFR 187-543-004 $14.94SFR 187-544-003 $14.94SFR 187-544-004 $14.94SFR 187-551-001 $14.94SFR 187-551-002 $14.94SFR - 100 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 187-551-003 $14.94SFR 187-551-006 $14.94SFR 187-551-007 $14.94SFR 187-551-008 $14.94SFR 187-552-001 $14.94SFR 187-552-002 $14.94SFR 187-560-003 $14.94SFR 187-560-004 $14.94SFR 187-560-005 $14.94SFR 187-560-006 $14.94SFR 187-560-007 $14.94SFR 187-560-008 $14.94SFR 187-560-009 $14.94SFR 187-560-010 $14.94SFR 187-560-011 $14.94SFR 187-560-012 $14.94SFR 187-560-013 $14.94SFR 187-560-014 $14.94SFR 187-560-015 $14.94SFR 187-560-016 $14.94SFR 187-560-017 $14.94SFR 187-560-019 $14.94SFR 187-560-020 $14.94SFR 187-570-001 $14.94SFR 187-570-002 $14.94SFR 187-570-003 $14.94SFR 187-570-004 $14.94SFR 187-570-005 $14.94SFR 187-570-006 $14.94SFR 187-570-007 $14.94SFR 187-570-008 $14.94SFR 187-580-001 $14.94SFR 187-580-002 $14.94SFR 187-580-003 $14.94SFR 187-580-004 $14.94SFR 187-580-005 $14.94SFR 187-580-006 $14.94SFR 187-580-007 $14.94SFR 187-580-008 $14.94SFR 187-580-009 $14.94SFR 187-580-010 $14.94SFR 187-580-011 $14.94SFR 187-580-012 $14.94SFR 187-580-013 $14.94SFR 187-580-014 $14.94SFR 187-580-015 $14.94SFR 187-580-016 $14.94SFR 187-580-017 $14.94SFR 187-580-018 $14.94SFR 187-580-019 $14.94SFR 187-580-020 $14.94SFR 187-580-021 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 187-580-022 $14.94SFR 187-580-023 $14.94SFR 187-580-024 $14.94SFR 187-580-025 $14.94SFR 187-580-026 $14.94SFR 187-580-027 $14.94SFR 187-580-028 $14.94SFR 187-580-029 $14.94SFR 187-580-030 $14.94SFR 187-580-031 $14.94SFR 187-580-032 $14.94SFR 187-580-033 $14.94SFR 187-580-034 $14.94SFR 187-580-035 $14.94SFR 187-590-001 $14.94SFR 187-590-002 $14.94SFR 187-590-003 $14.94SFR 187-590-004 $14.94SFR 187-590-005 $14.94SFR 187-590-006 $14.94SFR 187-590-007 $14.94SFR 187-590-008 $14.94SFR 187-590-009 $14.94SFR 187-590-010 $14.94SFR 187-590-011 $14.94SFR 187-590-012 $14.94SFR 187-590-013 $14.94SFR 187-590-014 $14.94SFR 187-590-015 $14.94SFR 187-590-016 $14.94SFR 187-590-017 $14.94SFR 187-590-018 $14.94SFR 187-590-021 $14.94SFR 187-590-022 $14.94SFR 187-590-023 $14.94SFR 187-590-024 $14.94SFR 187-590-025 $14.94SFR 187-590-026 $14.94SFR 187-590-027 $14.94SFR 187-590-028 $14.94SFR 187-590-029 $14.94SFR 187-590-030 $14.94SFR 187-590-031 $14.94SFR 187-590-032 $14.94SFR 187-590-033 $14.94SFR 187-590-034 $14.94SFR 187-590-035 $14.94SFR 188-031-020 $14.94SFR 188-031-021 $14.94SFR 188-031-023 $14.94SFR 188-031-024 $14.94SFR 188-031-027 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 188-031-028 $14.94SFR 188-060-018 $14.94SFR 188-060-019 $14.94SFR 188-060-020 $14.94SFR 188-060-021 $14.94SFR 188-060-028 $14.94SFR 188-060-029 $14.94SFR 188-060-031 $14.94SFR 188-060-032 $14.94SFR 188-060-033 $14.94SFR 188-060-034 $14.94SFR 188-060-035 $14.94SFR 188-060-036 $14.94SFR 188-060-037 $14.94SFR 188-060-039 $14.94SFR 188-060-040 $14.94SFR 188-060-041 $14.94SFR 188-060-042 $14.94SFR 188-060-043 $14.94SFR 188-060-044 $14.94SFR 188-090-017 $14.94SFR 188-120-032 $14.94SFR 188-120-033 $14.94SFR 188-120-034 $14.94SFR 188-120-035 $14.94SFR 188-120-036 $14.94SFR 188-141-009 $14.94SFR 188-141-010 $7.46VSFR 188-220-035 $14.94SFR 188-220-036 $7.46VSFR 188-220-037 $14.94SFR 188-231-009 $14.94SFR 188-231-010 $14.94SFR 188-231-011 $14.94SFR 188-231-017 $14.94SFR 188-231-018 $14.94SFR 188-321-010 $14.94SFR 188-321-011 $14.94SFR 188-340-023 $14.94SFR 188-340-024 $14.94SFR 188-360-028 $14.94SFR 188-360-029 $14.94SFR 188-370-032 $14.94SFR 188-370-035 $14.94SFR 188-370-038 $14.94SFR 188-450-001 $14.94SFR 188-450-002 $14.94SFR 188-450-003 $14.94SFR 188-450-004 $14.94SFR 188-450-005 $14.94SFR 188-450-006 $14.94SFR 188-450-007 $14.94SFR - 101 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 188-450-008 $14.94SFR 188-450-009 $14.94SFR 188-450-010 $14.94SFR 188-450-011 $14.94SFR 188-450-012 $14.94SFR 188-450-013 $14.94SFR 188-450-014 $14.94SFR 188-450-015 $14.94SFR 188-450-016 $14.94SFR 188-450-017 $14.94SFR 191-061-001 $14.94SFR 191-061-004 $14.94SFR 191-061-005 $14.94SFR 191-061-006 $14.94SFR 191-061-007 $14.94SFR 191-061-008 $14.94SFR 191-061-009 $14.94SFR 191-061-010 $14.94SFR 191-062-001 $14.94SFR 191-062-002 $14.94SFR 191-062-003 $14.94SFR 191-062-004 $14.94SFR 191-062-007 $14.94SFR 191-062-008 $14.94SFR 191-062-009 $14.94SFR 191-062-010 $14.94SFR 191-062-011 $14.94SFR 191-062-012 $14.94SFR 191-062-013 $14.94SFR 191-062-014 $14.94SFR 191-062-015 $14.94SFR 191-062-016 $14.94SFR 191-062-017 $14.94SFR 191-062-018 $14.94SFR 191-062-019 $14.94SFR 191-062-020 $14.94SFR 191-062-025 $14.94SFR 191-062-026 $14.94SFR 191-070-010 $14.94SFR 191-070-011 $14.94SFR 191-070-014 $14.94SFR 191-070-015 $14.94SFR 191-070-016 $14.94SFR 191-070-017 $14.94SFR 191-070-018 $14.94SFR 191-070-019 $14.94SFR 191-071-001 $14.94SFR 191-071-002 $14.94SFR 191-071-003 $14.94SFR 191-071-004 $14.94SFR 191-071-005 $14.94SFR 191-071-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 191-071-007 $14.94SFR 191-071-008 $14.94SFR 191-071-009 $14.94SFR 191-080-030 $14.94SFR 191-080-031 $14.94SFR 191-080-032 $14.94SFR 191-080-033 $14.94SFR 191-080-034 $14.94SFR 191-080-035 $14.94SFR 191-080-036 $14.94SFR 191-080-037 $14.94SFR 191-080-038 $14.94SFR 191-080-039 $14.94SFR 191-080-040 $14.94SFR 191-080-041 $14.94SFR 191-080-042 $14.94SFR 191-080-046 $14.94SFR 191-080-047 $14.94SFR 191-080-051 $74.70COM 191-093-043 $74.70COM 191-093-044 $74.70COM 191-093-045 $74.70COM 191-093-046 $74.70COM 191-093-049 $74.70COM 191-093-050 $7.46VCOM 191-161-001 $14.94SFR 191-161-002 $14.94SFR 191-161-003 $14.94SFR 191-162-004 $14.94SFR 191-162-005 $14.94SFR 191-162-006 $14.94SFR 191-180-001 $74.70COM 191-180-002 $74.70COM 191-180-003 $74.70COM 191-180-004 $74.70COM 191-180-005 $74.70COM 191-180-006 $74.70COM 191-180-007 $74.70COM 191-180-008 $74.70COM 191-180-009 $74.70COM 191-180-010 $74.70COM 191-180-011 $74.70COM 191-180-012 $74.70COM 191-180-013 $74.70COM 191-180-014 $74.70COM 191-180-015 $74.70COM 191-180-016 $74.70COM 191-180-017 $74.70COM 192-071-030 $74.70COM 192-071-046 $14.94SFR 192-071-047 $14.94SFR 192-071-048 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 192-071-049 $14.94SFR 192-071-050 $14.94SFR 192-071-051 $14.94SFR 192-071-052 $14.94SFR 192-071-053 $14.94SFR 192-071-054 $14.94SFR 192-071-055 $14.94SFR 192-071-056 $14.94SFR 192-071-057 $14.94SFR 192-071-058 $14.94SFR 192-071-059 $14.94SFR 192-071-060 $14.94SFR 192-071-061 $14.94SFR 192-071-062 $74.70COM 192-071-064 $74.70COM 192-081-003 $74.70COM 192-081-004 $74.70COM 192-170-057 $14.94SFR 192-170-058 $14.94SFR 192-210-023 $14.94SFR 192-210-024 $14.94SFR 192-210-025 $14.94SFR 192-210-027 $14.94SFR 192-210-028 $14.94SFR 192-210-029 $14.94SFR 192-210-030 $14.94SFR 192-210-031 $14.94SFR 192-220-019 $14.94SFR 192-220-020 $14.94SFR 192-220-021 $14.94SFR 192-220-022 $14.94SFR 192-220-023 $14.94SFR 192-220-024 $14.94SFR 192-240-019 $14.94SFR 192-240-020 $14.94SFR 192-240-021 $14.94SFR 192-240-022 $14.94SFR 192-240-023 $14.94SFR 192-260-020 $7.46VSFR 192-260-021 $14.94SFR 192-260-022 $7.46VSFR 192-300-021 $14.94SFR 192-300-022 $14.94SFR 192-300-023 $14.94SFR 192-300-024 $14.94SFR 192-300-025 $14.94SFR 192-300-026 $14.94SFR 192-300-027 $14.94SFR 192-331-001 $14.94SFR 192-331-002 $14.94SFR 192-331-003 $14.94SFR 192-331-004 $14.94SFR - 102 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 192-331-005 $14.94SFR 192-331-006 $14.94SFR 192-331-007 $14.94SFR 192-331-008 $14.94SFR 192-331-009 $14.94SFR 192-332-001 $14.94SFR 192-332-002 $14.94SFR 192-332-003 $14.94SFR 192-332-006 $29.88MFR2 192-332-007 $14.94SFR 192-332-008 $14.94SFR 192-333-001 $14.94SFR 192-333-002 $14.94SFR 192-333-003 $14.94SFR 192-333-004 $14.94SFR 192-333-005 $14.94SFR 192-340-001 $14.94SFR 192-340-002 $14.94SFR 192-340-003 $14.94SFR 192-340-004 $14.94SFR 192-340-005 $14.94SFR 192-340-006 $14.94SFR 192-340-007 $14.94SFR 192-340-008 $14.94SFR 192-340-009 $14.94SFR 192-340-010 $14.94SFR 192-340-011 $14.94SFR 192-340-012 $14.94SFR 192-340-013 $14.94SFR 192-340-014 $14.94SFR 192-340-015 $14.94SFR 192-340-016 $14.94SFR 192-340-017 $14.94SFR 192-340-018 $14.94SFR 192-350-001 $14.94SFR 192-350-002 $14.94SFR 193-020-011 $14.94SFR 193-020-012 $14.94SFR 193-020-015 $14.94SFR 193-030-026 $14.94SFR 193-030-028 $14.94SFR 193-050-018 $14.94SFR 193-050-019 $14.94SFR 193-050-020 $14.94SFR 193-050-022 $14.94SFR 193-050-023 $14.94SFR 193-050-024 $14.94SFR 193-070-028 $14.94SFR 193-070-029 $14.94SFR 193-070-030 $14.94SFR 193-070-031 $14.94SFR 193-070-032 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-070-033 $14.94SFR 193-070-034 $14.94SFR 193-070-035 $14.94SFR 193-070-036 $14.94SFR 193-070-037 $14.94SFR 193-070-038 $14.94SFR 193-070-039 $14.94SFR 193-070-040 $14.94SFR 193-070-041 $14.94SFR 193-070-042 $14.94SFR 193-070-043 $14.94SFR 193-070-044 $14.94SFR 193-070-045 $14.94SFR 193-080-056 $14.94SFR 193-080-057 $14.94SFR 193-080-120 $14.94SFR 193-080-121 $7.46VSFR 193-080-122 $14.94SFR 193-080-123 $14.94SFR 193-111-020 $14.94SFR 193-111-021 $14.94SFR 193-112-009 $14.94SFR 193-112-010 $14.94SFR 193-112-011 $14.94SFR 193-112-012 $14.94SFR 193-112-013 $14.94SFR 193-112-014 $14.94SFR 193-112-015 $14.94SFR 193-130-010 $14.94SFR 193-130-011 $14.94SFR 193-130-012 $14.94SFR 193-130-013 $14.94SFR 193-130-014 $14.94SFR 193-130-015 $14.94SFR 193-130-016 $14.94SFR 193-130-017 $14.94SFR 193-130-018 $14.94SFR 193-130-019 $14.94SFR 193-130-020 $14.94SFR 193-130-021 $14.94SFR 193-130-022 $14.94SFR 193-130-031 $14.94SFR 193-130-032 $14.94SFR 193-140-010 $14.94SFR 193-140-011 $14.94SFR 193-140-012 $14.94SFR 193-140-013 $14.94SFR 193-140-014 $14.94SFR 193-140-015 $14.94SFR 193-140-016 $14.94SFR 193-140-017 $14.94SFR 193-140-018 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-140-019 $14.94SFR 193-140-021 $14.94SFR 193-140-022 $14.94SFR 193-140-023 $14.94SFR 193-140-024 $14.94SFR 193-140-025 $14.94SFR 193-140-027 $14.94SFR 193-140-028 $14.94SFR 193-141-001 $14.94SFR 193-141-002 $14.94SFR 193-141-003 $14.94SFR 193-180-024 $14.94SFR 193-180-026 $14.94SFR 193-180-027 $14.94SFR 193-180-030 $14.94SFR 193-180-032 $14.94SFR 193-180-033 $14.94SFR 193-180-034 $14.94SFR 193-180-035 $14.94SFR 193-180-036 $14.94SFR 193-190-031 $7.46MISC 193-190-032 $7.46MISC 193-401-002 $14.94SFR 193-401-003 $14.94SFR 193-401-004 $14.94SFR 193-401-005 $14.94SFR 193-401-006 $14.94SFR 193-401-007 $14.94SFR 193-401-008 $14.94SFR 193-401-009 $14.94SFR 193-401-010 $14.94SFR 193-401-011 $14.94SFR 193-401-012 $14.94SFR 193-401-013 $14.94SFR 193-402-001 $14.94SFR 193-402-002 $14.94SFR 193-482-002 $14.94SFR 193-482-003 $14.94SFR 193-482-004 $14.94SFR 193-482-005 $14.94SFR 193-482-006 $14.94SFR 193-482-007 $14.94SFR 193-482-008 $14.94SFR 193-482-013 $14.94SFR 193-482-014 $14.94SFR 193-482-016 $14.94SFR 193-482-017 $14.94SFR 193-482-018 $14.94SFR 193-482-019 $14.94SFR 193-483-001 $14.94SFR 193-483-002 $14.94SFR 193-483-003 $14.94SFR - 103 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-483-004 $14.94SFR 193-483-005 $14.94SFR 193-491-001 $14.94SFR 193-491-002 $14.94SFR 193-492-001 $14.94SFR 193-492-002 $14.94SFR 193-492-003 $14.94SFR 193-492-007 $14.94SFR 193-492-008 $14.94SFR 193-492-009 $14.94SFR 193-492-012 $14.94SFR 193-492-014 $14.94SFR 193-492-015 $14.94SFR 193-531-001 $14.94SFR 193-531-002 $14.94SFR 193-531-003 $14.94SFR 193-531-004 $14.94SFR 193-531-005 $14.94SFR 193-531-006 $14.94SFR 193-531-007 $14.94SFR 193-532-001 $14.94SFR 193-532-002 $14.94SFR 193-532-003 $14.94SFR 193-532-004 $14.94SFR 193-532-005 $14.94SFR 193-532-006 $14.94SFR 193-532-007 $14.94SFR 193-532-008 $14.94SFR 193-533-002 $14.94SFR 193-541-001 $14.94SFR 193-541-002 $14.94SFR 193-541-003 $14.94SFR 193-541-004 $14.94SFR 193-541-005 $14.94SFR 193-541-006 $14.94SFR 193-541-009 $14.94SFR 193-541-010 $14.94SFR 193-541-011 $14.94SFR 193-541-012 $14.94SFR 193-541-013 $14.94SFR 193-541-014 $14.94SFR 193-541-015 $14.94SFR 193-541-016 $14.94SFR 193-541-017 $14.94SFR 193-541-018 $14.94SFR 193-541-019 $14.94SFR 193-541-020 $14.94SFR 193-541-021 $14.94SFR 193-541-022 $14.94SFR 193-541-023 $14.94SFR 193-541-024 $14.94SFR 193-541-025 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-541-026 $14.94SFR 193-541-027 $14.94SFR 193-541-030 $14.94SFR 193-541-031 $14.94SFR 193-542-001 $14.94SFR 193-542-002 $14.94SFR 193-542-003 $14.94SFR 193-542-004 $14.94SFR 193-542-005 $14.94SFR 193-542-006 $14.94SFR 193-542-007 $14.94SFR 193-551-001 $14.94SFR 193-551-002 $14.94SFR 193-551-003 $14.94SFR 193-552-001 $14.94SFR 193-552-002 $14.94SFR 193-552-003 $14.94SFR 193-552-004 $14.94SFR 193-552-005 $14.94SFR 193-552-006 $14.94SFR 193-552-007 $14.94SFR 193-552-008 $14.94SFR 193-552-009 $14.94SFR 193-552-010 $14.94SFR 193-552-013 $14.94SFR 193-552-014 $14.94SFR 193-552-015 $14.94SFR 193-552-016 $14.94SFR 193-552-017 $14.94SFR 193-552-018 $14.94SFR 193-552-021 $14.94SFR 193-552-022 $14.94SFR 193-552-023 $14.94SFR 193-552-024 $14.94SFR 193-560-002 $14.94SFR 193-560-003 $14.94SFR 193-560-004 $14.94SFR 193-560-005 $14.94SFR 193-560-006 $14.94SFR 193-560-007 $14.94SFR 193-560-008 $14.94SFR 193-560-009 $14.94SFR 193-560-010 $14.94SFR 193-560-011 $14.94SFR 193-560-012 $14.94SFR 193-560-013 $14.94SFR 193-560-014 $14.94SFR 193-560-016 $14.94SFR 193-570-001 $14.94SFR 193-570-002 $14.94SFR 193-570-003 $14.94SFR 193-570-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-570-005 $14.94SFR 193-570-006 $14.94SFR 193-570-009 $14.94SFR 193-570-010 $14.94SFR 193-570-011 $14.94SFR 193-570-012 $14.94SFR 193-570-015 $14.94SFR 193-570-016 $14.94SFR 193-570-017 $14.94SFR 193-570-019 $14.94SFR 193-570-020 $14.94SFR 193-570-022 $14.94SFR 193-570-023 $7.46VSFR 193-570-026 $14.94SFR 193-580-001 $14.94SFR 193-580-002 $14.94SFR 193-580-003 $14.94SFR 193-580-004 $14.94SFR 193-580-005 $14.94SFR 193-580-006 $14.94SFR 193-580-007 $14.94SFR 193-580-008 $14.94SFR 193-580-009 $14.94SFR 193-580-010 $14.94SFR 193-580-011 $14.94SFR 193-580-012 $14.94SFR 193-580-013 $14.94SFR 193-580-014 $14.94SFR 193-580-015 $14.94SFR 193-580-016 $14.94SFR 193-580-017 $14.94SFR 193-580-018 $14.94SFR 193-591-001 $14.94SFR 193-591-002 $14.94SFR 193-591-003 $14.94SFR 193-592-001 $14.94SFR 193-592-002 $14.94SFR 193-592-003 $14.94SFR 193-592-004 $14.94SFR 193-592-007 $14.94SFR 193-592-008 $14.94SFR 193-592-009 $14.94SFR 193-592-011 $14.94SFR 193-592-012 $14.94SFR 193-592-013 $14.94SFR 193-592-014 $14.94SFR 193-592-017 $14.94SFR 193-611-003 $14.94SFR 193-611-004 $14.94SFR 193-611-005 $14.94SFR 193-611-006 $14.94SFR 193-611-007 $14.94SFR - 104 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-611-008 $14.94SFR 193-611-009 $14.94SFR 193-612-001 $14.94SFR 193-612-002 $14.94SFR 193-612-003 $14.94SFR 193-612-004 $14.94SFR 193-612-007 $14.94SFR 193-612-008 $14.94SFR 193-612-009 $14.94SFR 193-612-010 $14.94SFR 193-612-013 $14.94SFR 193-612-014 $14.94SFR 193-631-001 $14.94SFR 193-631-002 $14.94SFR 193-631-003 $14.94SFR 193-631-004 $14.94SFR 193-632-001 $14.94SFR 193-632-002 $14.94SFR 193-632-003 $14.94SFR 193-632-004 $14.94SFR 193-632-005 $14.94SFR 193-632-006 $14.94SFR 193-632-007 $14.94SFR 193-641-001 $14.94SFR 193-641-002 $14.94SFR 193-642-001 $14.94SFR 193-642-002 $14.94SFR 193-643-001 $14.94SFR 193-643-002 $14.94SFR 193-643-003 $14.94SFR 193-643-004 $14.94SFR 193-643-005 $14.94SFR 193-643-006 $14.94SFR 193-643-007 $14.94SFR 193-650-002 $14.94SFR 193-650-003 $14.94SFR 193-650-004 $14.94SFR 193-650-005 $14.94SFR 193-650-006 $14.94SFR 193-650-007 $14.94SFR 193-650-008 $14.94SFR 193-650-009 $14.94SFR 193-650-010 $14.94SFR 193-650-011 $14.94SFR 193-650-012 $14.94SFR 193-650-015 $14.94SFR 193-650-016 $14.94SFR 193-650-017 $14.94SFR 193-650-018 $14.94SFR 193-650-019 $14.94SFR 193-650-020 $14.94SFR 193-650-021 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-650-022 $14.94SFR 193-650-023 $14.94SFR 193-650-024 $14.94SFR 193-650-025 $14.94SFR 193-650-026 $14.94SFR 193-650-027 $14.94SFR 193-650-028 $14.94SFR 193-650-029 $14.94SFR 193-650-030 $14.94SFR 193-650-031 $14.94SFR 193-650-032 $14.94SFR 193-650-033 $14.94SFR 193-650-034 $14.94SFR 193-650-035 $14.94SFR 193-650-036 $14.94SFR 193-650-037 $14.94SFR 193-650-038 $14.94SFR 193-650-039 $14.94SFR 193-650-040 $14.94SFR 193-650-041 $14.94SFR 193-650-043 $14.94SFR 193-650-044 $14.94SFR 193-650-045 $14.94SFR 193-650-046 $14.94SFR 193-650-047 $14.94SFR 193-650-048 $14.94SFR 193-650-049 $14.94SFR 193-650-050 $14.94SFR 193-650-051 $14.94SFR 193-650-052 $14.94SFR 193-650-053 $14.94SFR 193-650-054 $14.94SFR 193-650-055 $14.94SFR 193-660-001 $14.94SFR 193-660-002 $14.94SFR 193-660-003 $14.94SFR 193-660-004 $14.94SFR 193-660-005 $14.94SFR 193-660-006 $14.94SFR 193-660-007 $14.94SFR 193-660-008 $14.94SFR 193-660-009 $14.94SFR 193-660-010 $14.94SFR 193-660-011 $14.94SFR 193-660-012 $14.94SFR 193-660-013 $14.94SFR 193-660-014 $14.94SFR 193-660-015 $14.94SFR 193-660-016 $14.94SFR 193-660-017 $14.94SFR 193-660-018 $14.94SFR 193-660-020 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-660-021 $14.94SFR 193-660-022 $14.94SFR 193-660-023 $14.94SFR 193-660-024 $14.94SFR 193-660-025 $14.94SFR 193-660-026 $14.94SFR 193-660-027 $14.94SFR 193-660-028 $14.94SFR 193-660-029 $14.94SFR 193-660-032 $14.94SFR 193-660-033 $14.94SFR 193-660-034 $14.94SFR 193-660-035 $14.94SFR 193-660-036 $14.94SFR 193-660-037 $14.94SFR 193-660-038 $14.94SFR 193-660-039 $14.94SFR 193-660-040 $14.94SFR 193-660-041 $14.94SFR 193-660-042 $14.94SFR 193-660-043 $14.94SFR 193-660-045 $14.94SFR 193-660-046 $14.94SFR 193-660-047 $14.94SFR 193-660-048 $14.94SFR 193-660-058 $14.94SFR 193-660-059 $14.94SFR 193-660-060 $14.94SFR 193-660-061 $14.94SFR 193-670-004 $14.94SFR 193-670-009 $14.94SFR 193-670-010 $14.94SFR 193-670-011 $14.94SFR 193-670-015 $14.94SFR 193-670-016 $14.94SFR 193-670-018 $14.94SFR 193-670-019 $14.94SFR 193-670-020 $14.94SFR 193-720-001 $14.94SFR 193-720-002 $14.94SFR 193-720-003 $14.94SFR 193-720-004 $14.94SFR 193-720-005 $14.94SFR 193-721-001 $14.94SFR 193-721-002 $14.94SFR 193-721-003 $14.94SFR 193-721-004 $14.94SFR 193-721-005 $14.94SFR 193-722-001 $14.94SFR 193-722-002 $14.94SFR 193-722-003 $14.94SFR 193-722-004 $14.94SFR - 105 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-722-005 $14.94SFR 193-722-006 $14.94SFR 193-722-007 $14.94SFR 193-722-008 $14.94SFR 193-722-009 $14.94SFR 193-722-010 $14.94SFR 193-722-011 $14.94SFR 193-723-001 $14.94SFR 193-723-002 $14.94SFR 193-723-003 $14.94SFR 193-723-004 $14.94SFR 193-723-005 $14.94SFR 193-723-006 $14.94SFR 193-723-007 $14.94SFR 193-723-008 $14.94SFR 193-723-009 $14.94SFR 193-723-010 $14.94SFR 193-723-011 $14.94SFR 193-723-012 $14.94SFR 193-723-013 $14.94SFR 193-723-014 $14.94SFR 193-730-001 $14.94SFR 193-730-002 $14.94SFR 193-730-003 $14.94SFR 193-730-004 $14.94SFR 193-730-005 $14.94SFR 193-730-006 $14.94SFR 193-730-007 $14.94SFR 193-730-008 $14.94SFR 193-730-011 $14.94SFR 193-730-012 $14.94SFR 193-730-013 $14.94SFR 193-730-014 $14.94SFR 193-730-015 $14.94SFR 193-730-016 $14.94SFR 193-730-017 $14.94SFR 193-730-018 $14.94SFR 193-730-019 $14.94SFR 193-730-021 $14.94SFR 193-730-022 $14.94SFR 193-731-001 $14.94SFR 193-731-002 $14.94SFR 193-740-001 $14.94SFR 193-740-002 $14.94SFR 193-740-003 $14.94SFR 193-740-004 $14.94SFR 193-740-005 $14.94SFR 193-740-007 $14.94SFR 193-740-008 $14.94SFR 193-740-009 $14.94SFR 193-740-010 $14.94SFR 193-740-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-740-012 $14.94SFR 193-740-014 $14.94SFR 193-740-015 $14.94SFR 193-740-016 $14.94SFR 193-740-017 $14.94SFR 193-740-018 $14.94SFR 193-740-019 $14.94SFR 193-740-020 $14.94SFR 193-740-021 $14.94SFR 193-740-022 $14.94SFR 193-740-023 $14.94SFR 193-740-024 $14.94SFR 193-740-025 $14.94SFR 193-740-026 $14.94SFR 193-740-027 $14.94SFR 193-741-001 $14.94SFR 193-741-002 $14.94SFR 193-741-003 $14.94SFR 193-741-004 $14.94SFR 193-741-005 $14.94SFR 193-741-006 $14.94SFR 193-770-001 $14.94SFR 193-770-002 $14.94SFR 193-770-010 $14.94SFR 193-770-011 $14.94SFR 193-770-012 $14.94SFR 193-770-013 $14.94SFR 193-770-014 $14.94SFR 193-781-001 $14.94SFR 193-781-002 $14.94SFR 193-781-003 $14.94SFR 193-781-004 $14.94SFR 193-781-005 $14.94SFR 193-781-006 $14.94SFR 193-781-007 $14.94SFR 193-781-008 $14.94SFR 193-781-009 $14.94SFR 193-781-010 $14.94SFR 193-781-011 $14.94SFR 193-781-012 $14.94SFR 193-781-013 $14.94SFR 193-781-014 $14.94SFR 193-781-015 $14.94SFR 193-781-016 $14.94SFR 193-781-017 $14.94SFR 193-782-001 $14.94SFR 193-783-001 $14.94SFR 193-783-002 $14.94SFR 193-783-003 $14.94SFR 193-783-004 $14.94SFR 193-783-005 $14.94SFR 193-790-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-790-002 $14.94SFR 193-790-003 $14.94SFR 193-790-004 $14.94SFR 193-790-006 $14.94SFR 193-790-007 $14.94SFR 193-790-008 $14.94SFR 193-790-009 $14.94SFR 193-790-011 $14.94SFR 193-801-001 $14.94SFR 193-801-002 $14.94SFR 193-801-003 $14.94SFR 193-801-004 $14.94SFR 193-801-005 $14.94SFR 193-801-006 $14.94SFR 193-801-007 $14.94SFR 193-801-008 $14.94SFR 193-801-009 $14.94SFR 193-801-010 $14.94SFR 193-801-011 $14.94SFR 193-801-012 $14.94SFR 193-801-013 $14.94SFR 193-801-014 $14.94SFR 193-801-015 $14.94SFR 193-801-016 $14.94SFR 193-801-017 $14.94SFR 193-801-018 $14.94SFR 193-801-019 $14.94SFR 193-801-020 $14.94SFR 193-801-021 $14.94SFR 193-801-022 $14.94SFR 193-801-023 $14.94SFR 193-801-026 $14.94SFR 193-801-027 $14.94SFR 193-811-001 $14.94SFR 193-811-002 $14.94SFR 193-811-003 $14.94SFR 193-811-004 $14.94SFR 193-811-005 $14.94SFR 193-811-006 $14.94SFR 193-811-007 $14.94SFR 193-811-008 $14.94SFR 193-811-009 $14.94SFR 193-811-025 $14.94SFR 193-811-026 $14.94SFR 193-811-027 $14.94SFR 193-811-028 $14.94SFR 193-811-035 $14.94SFR 193-811-036 $14.94SFR 193-811-037 $14.94SFR 193-811-038 $14.94SFR 193-811-039 $14.94SFR 193-811-040 $14.94SFR - 106 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-811-041 $14.94SFR 193-811-042 $14.94SFR 193-811-043 $14.94SFR 193-811-044 $14.94SFR 193-811-045 $14.94SFR 193-811-046 $14.94SFR 193-811-047 $14.94SFR 193-811-048 $14.94SFR 193-811-049 $14.94SFR 193-811-050 $14.94SFR 193-811-051 $14.94SFR 193-811-052 $14.94SFR 193-811-053 $14.94SFR 193-811-054 $14.94SFR 193-812-012 $14.94SFR 193-812-013 $14.94SFR 193-812-014 $14.94SFR 193-812-015 $14.94SFR 193-812-016 $14.94SFR 193-812-017 $14.94SFR 193-812-018 $14.94SFR 193-812-019 $14.94SFR 193-812-020 $14.94SFR 193-812-021 $14.94SFR 193-820-002 $14.94SFR 193-820-003 $14.94SFR 193-820-004 $14.94SFR 193-820-005 $14.94SFR 193-820-015 $14.94SFR 193-820-016 $14.94SFR 193-820-017 $14.94SFR 193-820-018 $14.94SFR 193-820-019 $14.94SFR 193-820-020 $14.94SFR 193-820-021 $14.94SFR 193-820-022 $14.94SFR 193-840-001 $14.94SFR 193-840-002 $14.94SFR 193-840-003 $14.94SFR 193-840-004 $14.94SFR 193-840-005 $14.94SFR 193-840-006 $14.94SFR 193-840-007 $14.94SFR 193-840-010 $14.94SFR 193-840-011 $14.94SFR 193-840-012 $14.94SFR 193-840-013 $14.94SFR 193-840-014 $14.94SFR 193-840-015 $14.94SFR 193-840-016 $14.94SFR 193-840-017 $14.94SFR 193-840-018 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-840-019 $14.94SFR 193-840-020 $14.94SFR 193-840-021 $14.94SFR 193-840-022 $14.94SFR 193-840-023 $14.94SFR 193-840-024 $14.94SFR 193-840-025 $14.94SFR 193-840-026 $14.94SFR 193-840-027 $14.94SFR 193-850-001 $14.94SFR 193-850-002 $14.94SFR 193-850-004 $14.94SFR 193-850-005 $14.94SFR 193-850-006 $14.94SFR 193-850-007 $14.94SFR 193-850-008 $14.94SFR 193-850-010 $14.94SFR 193-850-011 $14.94SFR 193-850-012 $14.94SFR 193-850-013 $14.94SFR 193-850-014 $14.94SFR 193-850-015 $14.94SFR 193-850-016 $14.94SFR 193-850-017 $14.94SFR 193-870-005 $14.94SFR 193-870-006 $14.94SFR 193-910-001 $14.94SFR 193-910-002 $14.94SFR 193-910-003 $14.94SFR 193-910-004 $14.94SFR 193-910-005 $14.94SFR 193-910-006 $14.94SFR 193-920-001 $14.94SFR 193-920-002 $14.94SFR 193-920-003 $14.94SFR 193-920-004 $14.94SFR 193-920-005 $14.94SFR 193-920-006 $14.94SFR 193-920-007 $14.94SFR 193-920-008 $14.94SFR 193-920-009 $14.94SFR 193-920-010 $14.94SFR 193-920-011 $14.94SFR 193-920-012 $14.94SFR 193-920-013 $14.94SFR 193-920-014 $14.94SFR 193-920-015 $14.94SFR 193-920-016 $14.94SFR 193-920-017 $14.94SFR 193-920-018 $14.94SFR 193-920-019 $14.94SFR 193-920-020 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-920-021 $14.94SFR 193-920-022 $14.94SFR 193-920-023 $14.94SFR 193-920-024 $14.94SFR 193-920-025 $14.94SFR 193-920-026 $14.94SFR 193-920-027 $14.94SFR 193-920-028 $14.94SFR 193-920-029 $14.94SFR 193-920-030 $14.94SFR 193-920-031 $14.94SFR 193-920-032 $14.94SFR 193-920-033 $14.94SFR 193-920-034 $14.94SFR 193-920-035 $14.94SFR 193-920-036 $14.94SFR 193-920-037 $14.94SFR 193-920-038 $14.94SFR 193-920-039 $14.94SFR 193-920-040 $14.94SFR 193-920-041 $14.94SFR 193-920-042 $14.94SFR 193-920-043 $14.94SFR 193-920-044 $14.94SFR 193-920-045 $14.94SFR 193-920-046 $14.94SFR 193-920-047 $14.94SFR 193-930-001 $14.94SFR 193-930-002 $14.94SFR 193-930-003 $14.94SFR 193-930-004 $14.94SFR 193-930-005 $14.94SFR 193-930-006 $14.94SFR 193-930-007 $14.94SFR 193-930-008 $14.94SFR 193-930-009 $14.94SFR 193-930-010 $14.94SFR 193-930-011 $14.94SFR 193-930-012 $14.94SFR 193-930-013 $14.94SFR 193-930-014 $14.94SFR 193-930-015 $14.94SFR 193-940-001 $14.94SFR 193-940-002 $14.94SFR 193-940-003 $14.94SFR 193-940-004 $14.94SFR 193-940-005 $14.94SFR 193-940-006 $14.94SFR 193-940-007 $14.94SFR 193-940-008 $14.94SFR 193-940-009 $14.94SFR 193-940-010 $14.94SFR - 107 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 193-940-011 $14.94SFR 193-940-012 $14.94SFR 193-940-013 $14.94SFR 193-940-014 $14.94SFR 193-940-015 $14.94SFR 193-940-016 $14.94SFR 193-940-017 $14.94SFR 193-940-018 $14.94SFR 193-940-021 $14.94SFR 193-940-022 $14.94SFR 193-940-023 $14.94SFR 193-940-024 $14.94SFR 193-940-028 $14.94SFR 193-940-029 $14.94SFR 194-070-074 $14.94SFR 194-070-075 $14.94SFR 194-070-079 $14.94SFR 194-070-086 $14.94SFR 194-070-087 $14.94SFR 194-110-003 $14.94SFR 194-110-004 $14.94SFR 194-110-005 $14.94SFR 194-110-006 $14.94SFR 194-110-007 $14.94SFR 194-110-008 $14.94SFR 194-110-009 $14.94SFR 194-110-010 $14.94SFR 194-110-011 $14.94SFR 194-110-017 $7.46VSFR 194-110-019 $14.94SFR 194-110-020 $14.94SFR 194-110-021 $14.94SFR 194-110-022 $14.94SFR 194-121-002 $14.94SFR 194-121-003 $14.94SFR 194-121-004 $14.94SFR 194-121-005 $14.94SFR 194-121-006 $14.94SFR 194-121-007 $14.94SFR 194-121-009 $14.94SFR 194-121-011 $14.94SFR 194-121-012 $14.94SFR 194-121-014 $14.94SFR 194-122-002 $14.94SFR 194-122-003 $14.94SFR 194-122-004 $14.94SFR 194-122-005 $14.94SFR 194-122-006 $14.94SFR 194-122-007 $14.94SFR 194-122-008 $14.94SFR 194-122-009 $14.94SFR 194-123-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 194-123-002 $14.94SFR 194-123-003 $14.94SFR 194-123-004 $14.94SFR 194-123-005 $14.94SFR 194-123-008 $14.94SFR 194-123-009 $14.94SFR 194-123-010 $14.94SFR 194-123-011 $14.94SFR 194-123-012 $14.94SFR 194-123-013 $14.94SFR 194-123-014 $14.94SFR 194-123-015 $14.94SFR 194-123-016 $14.94SFR 194-131-001 $14.94SFR 194-131-002 $14.94SFR 194-131-003 $14.94SFR 194-131-004 $14.94SFR 194-131-005 $14.94SFR 194-131-009 $14.94SFR 194-131-010 $14.94SFR 194-131-012 $14.94SFR 194-131-014 $14.94SFR 194-132-001 $14.94SFR 194-132-002 $14.94SFR 194-133-001 $14.94SFR 194-133-002 $14.94SFR 194-133-003 $14.94SFR 194-133-004 $14.94SFR 194-133-005 $14.94SFR 194-133-006 $14.94SFR 194-133-007 $14.94SFR 194-133-008 $14.94SFR 194-133-009 $14.94SFR 194-133-010 $14.94SFR 194-133-011 $14.94SFR 194-133-012 $14.94SFR 194-133-013 $14.94SFR 194-133-014 $14.94SFR 194-133-015 $14.94SFR 194-133-016 $14.94SFR 194-133-017 $14.94SFR 194-133-018 $14.94SFR 194-140-001 $14.94SFR 194-140-002 $14.94SFR 194-140-003 $14.94SFR 194-140-004 $14.94SFR 194-140-005 $14.94SFR 194-140-006 $14.94SFR 194-140-007 $14.94SFR 194-140-008 $14.94SFR 194-140-009 $14.94SFR 194-140-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 194-140-011 $14.94SFR 194-140-012 $14.94SFR 194-140-013 $14.94SFR 194-140-014 $14.94SFR 194-151-001 $14.94SFR 194-151-002 $14.94SFR 194-151-003 $14.94SFR 194-151-004 $14.94SFR 194-151-005 $14.94SFR 194-151-006 $14.94SFR 194-151-007 $14.94SFR 194-151-008 $14.94SFR 194-151-009 $14.94SFR 194-151-010 $14.94SFR 194-151-011 $14.94SFR 194-151-012 $14.94SFR 194-151-013 $14.94SFR 194-152-001 $14.94SFR 194-152-002 $14.94SFR 194-152-003 $14.94SFR 194-152-004 $14.94SFR 194-152-005 $14.94SFR 194-152-006 $14.94SFR 194-152-008 $14.94SFR 194-160-001 $14.94SFR 194-160-002 $14.94SFR 194-160-003 $14.94SFR 194-160-004 $14.94SFR 194-160-005 $14.94SFR 194-160-006 $14.94SFR 194-160-007 $14.94SFR 194-160-008 $14.94SFR 194-160-009 $14.94SFR 194-160-010 $14.94SFR 194-160-011 $14.94SFR 194-160-012 $14.94SFR 194-160-013 $14.94SFR 194-160-014 $14.94SFR 194-160-015 $14.94SFR 194-160-016 $14.94SFR 194-160-017 $14.94SFR 194-160-018 $14.94SFR 194-160-019 $14.94SFR 194-160-020 $14.94SFR 194-160-021 $14.94SFR 194-160-022 $14.94SFR 194-170-001 $14.94SFR 194-170-002 $14.94SFR 194-170-003 $14.94SFR 194-170-004 $14.94SFR 194-170-005 $14.94SFR 194-170-006 $14.94SFR - 108 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 194-170-007 $14.94SFR 194-170-008 $14.94SFR 194-170-009 $14.94SFR 194-170-010 $14.94SFR 194-170-015 $14.94SFR 194-170-016 $14.94SFR 194-170-017 $14.94SFR 194-170-018 $14.94SFR 194-170-019 $14.94SFR 194-170-020 $14.94SFR 194-170-022 $14.94SFR 194-170-023 $14.94SFR 194-170-025 $14.94SFR 194-170-026 $14.94SFR 194-190-001 $14.94SFR 194-190-002 $14.94SFR 194-190-003 $14.94SFR 194-190-005 $14.94SFR 194-190-006 $14.94SFR 194-190-007 $14.94SFR 194-190-008 $14.94SFR 194-190-009 $14.94SFR 194-190-010 $14.94SFR 194-190-011 $14.94SFR 194-190-012 $14.94SFR 194-190-013 $14.94SFR 194-190-014 $14.94SFR 194-190-015 $14.94SFR 194-190-016 $14.94SFR 194-190-017 $14.94SFR 194-190-019 $14.94SFR 194-201-001 $14.94SFR 194-201-002 $14.94SFR 194-201-003 $14.94SFR 194-202-001 $14.94SFR 194-202-002 $14.94SFR 194-202-003 $14.94SFR 194-202-004 $14.94SFR 194-202-005 $14.94SFR 194-202-006 $14.94SFR 194-202-007 $14.94SFR 194-202-008 $14.94SFR 194-202-009 $14.94SFR 194-211-001 $14.94SFR 194-211-002 $14.94SFR 194-211-003 $14.94SFR 194-211-004 $14.94SFR 194-211-005 $14.94SFR 194-211-006 $14.94SFR 194-211-007 $14.94SFR 194-211-008 $14.94SFR 194-211-009 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 194-211-010 $14.94SFR 194-211-011 $14.94SFR 194-211-012 $14.94SFR 194-212-001 $14.94SFR 194-212-002 $14.94SFR 194-212-003 $14.94SFR 194-212-004 $14.94SFR 194-212-005 $14.94SFR 194-212-006 $14.94SFR 194-212-007 $14.94SFR 194-212-008 $14.94SFR 194-213-001 $14.94SFR 194-213-004 $14.94SFR 194-213-005 $14.94SFR 194-213-007 $14.94SFR 194-213-008 $14.94SFR 194-221-001 $14.94SFR 194-221-002 $14.94SFR 194-221-003 $14.94SFR 194-221-004 $14.94SFR 194-221-005 $14.94SFR 194-221-006 $14.94SFR 194-221-007 $14.94SFR 194-221-010 $14.94SFR 194-221-011 $14.94SFR 194-221-015 $14.94SFR 194-221-016 $14.94SFR 194-222-003 $14.94SFR 194-222-004 $14.94SFR 194-222-005 $14.94SFR 194-222-006 $14.94SFR 194-222-007 $14.94SFR 194-222-008 $14.94SFR 194-222-009 $14.94SFR 194-222-010 $14.94SFR 194-222-011 $14.94SFR 194-222-012 $14.94SFR 194-222-013 $14.94SFR 194-222-014 $14.94SFR 194-222-015 $14.94SFR 194-222-016 $14.94SFR 194-222-018 $14.94SFR 194-222-019 $14.94SFR 194-231-001 $14.94SFR 194-231-002 $14.94SFR 194-231-004 $14.94SFR 194-231-006 $14.94SFR 194-231-007 $14.94SFR 194-231-008 $14.94SFR 194-231-010 $14.94SFR 194-231-011 $14.94SFR 194-232-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 194-232-002 $14.94SFR 194-232-003 $14.94SFR 194-232-004 $14.94SFR 194-232-005 $14.94SFR 194-232-006 $14.94SFR 194-232-007 $14.94SFR 194-232-008 $14.94SFR 194-232-009 $14.94SFR 194-232-010 $14.94SFR 194-232-011 $14.94SFR 194-232-012 $14.94SFR 194-232-013 $14.94SFR 194-232-014 $14.94SFR 194-232-015 $14.94SFR 194-232-016 $14.94SFR 196-010-034 $14.94SFR 196-010-035 $14.94SFR 196-010-036 $14.94SFR 196-010-037 $14.94SFR 196-010-038 $14.94SFR 196-010-039 $14.94SFR 196-010-040 $14.94SFR 196-010-041 $14.94SFR 196-010-042 $14.94SFR 196-010-043 $14.94SFR 196-031-007 $14.94SFR 196-031-009 $14.94SFR 196-070-004 $14.94SFR 196-080-040 $14.94SFR 196-080-042 $14.94SFR 196-080-043 $14.94SFR 197-010-008 $74.70COM 197-010-026 $74.70COM 197-020-024 $14.94SFR 197-020-025 $14.94SFR 197-030-003 $74.70INST 197-030-024 $74.70INST 197-040-033 $14.94SFR 197-040-034 $14.94SFR 197-040-035 $14.94SFR 197-040-036 $14.94SFR 197-040-037 $14.94SFR 197-060-002 $14.94SFR 197-060-003 $14.94SFR 197-060-004 $14.94SFR 197-060-005 $14.94SFR 197-060-006 $14.94SFR 197-060-007 $14.94SFR 197-060-008 $14.94SFR 197-060-009 $14.94SFR 197-060-010 $14.94SFR 197-060-011 $14.94SFR - 109 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 197-060-012 $14.94SFR 197-060-013 $14.94SFR 197-060-014 $14.94SFR 197-060-015 $14.94SFR 197-060-016 $14.94SFR 197-060-017 $14.94SFR 197-060-018 $14.94SFR 197-060-019 $14.94SFR 197-060-020 $14.94SFR 197-060-021 $14.94SFR 197-060-022 $14.94SFR 197-060-023 $14.94SFR 197-060-024 $14.94SFR 197-060-025 $14.94SFR 197-060-026 $14.94SFR 197-060-029 $14.94SFR 197-060-030 $14.94SFR 197-060-031 $14.94SFR 197-060-032 $14.94SFR 197-060-033 $14.94SFR 197-070-020 $14.94SFR 197-070-021 $14.94SFR 197-070-022 $14.94SFR 197-070-023 $14.94SFR 197-070-024 $14.94SFR 197-090-003 $74.70INST 197-090-006 $14.94SFR 197-090-008 $14.94SFR 197-200-006 $14.94SFR 197-200-007 $14.94SFR 197-200-008 $14.94SFR 197-200-009 $14.94SFR 197-200-010 $14.94SFR 197-200-011 $14.94SFR 197-200-012 $14.94SFR 197-200-013 $14.94SFR 197-200-014 $14.94SFR 197-200-015 $14.94SFR 197-200-016 $14.94SFR 197-200-017 $14.94SFR 197-200-018 $14.94SFR 197-200-019 $14.94SFR 197-200-022 $14.94SFR 197-200-023 $14.94SFR 197-200-025 $14.94SFR 197-200-026 $14.94SFR 197-200-027 $14.94SFR 197-201-001 $14.94SFR 197-201-002 $14.94SFR 197-201-003 $14.94SFR 197-220-002 $14.94SFR 197-220-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 197-220-004 $14.94SFR 197-220-005 $14.94SFR 197-220-011 $14.94SFR 197-220-015 $14.94SFR 197-220-017 $14.94SFR 197-220-018 $14.94SFR 197-270-018 $14.94SFR 197-270-019 $14.94SFR 197-270-022 $14.94SFR 197-270-023 $14.94SFR 197-301-001 $14.94SFR 197-301-002 $14.94SFR 197-301-003 $14.94SFR 197-301-004 $14.94SFR 197-301-005 $14.94SFR 197-301-011 $14.94SFR 197-301-012 $14.94SFR 197-301-013 $14.94SFR 197-302-002 $14.94SFR 197-302-003 $14.94SFR 197-302-004 $14.94SFR 197-302-005 $14.94SFR 197-302-006 $14.94SFR 197-302-007 $14.94SFR 197-302-008 $14.94SFR 197-302-009 $14.94SFR 197-302-010 $14.94SFR 197-302-011 $14.94SFR 197-302-012 $14.94SFR 197-302-015 $14.94SFR 197-303-001 $14.94SFR 197-303-002 $14.94SFR 197-303-003 $14.94SFR 197-303-004 $14.94SFR 197-303-005 $14.94SFR 197-303-006 $14.94SFR 197-303-007 $14.94SFR 197-340-001 $14.94SFR 197-340-002 $14.94SFR 197-340-003 $14.94SFR 197-340-004 $14.94SFR 197-340-005 $14.94SFR 197-340-006 $14.94SFR 197-340-007 $14.94SFR 197-340-008 $7.46VSFR 197-350-002 $14.94SFR 197-350-003 $14.94SFR 197-350-004 $14.94SFR 197-350-008 $14.94SFR 197-350-010 $14.94SFR 197-350-011 $14.94SFR 197-350-012 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 197-350-013 $14.94SFR 197-350-014 $14.94SFR 197-350-015 $14.94SFR 197-350-018 $14.94SFR 197-350-019 $14.94SFR 197-350-020 $14.94SFR 197-350-021 $14.94SFR 197-350-022 $14.94SFR 197-350-027 $14.94SFR 197-350-028 $14.94SFR 197-350-030 $14.94SFR 197-350-031 $14.94SFR 197-350-032 $14.94SFR 197-360-004 $14.94SFR 197-360-010 $14.94SFR 197-360-011 $14.94SFR 197-360-013 $14.94SFR 197-360-015 $14.94SFR 197-360-019 $14.94SFR 197-360-020 $14.94SFR 197-360-025 $14.94SFR 197-360-026 $14.94SFR 197-360-028 $14.94SFR 197-360-031 $14.94SFR 197-371-005 $14.94SFR 197-371-006 $14.94SFR 197-371-007 $14.94SFR 197-371-009 $14.94SFR 197-371-011 $14.94SFR 197-371-012 $14.94SFR 197-371-014 $14.94SFR 197-380-019 $14.94SFR 197-380-029 $14.94SFR 197-380-037 $14.94SFR 197-380-039 $14.94SFR 197-380-040 $14.94SFR 197-380-041 $14.94SFR 197-380-042 $14.94SFR 197-380-043 $14.94SFR 197-380-046 $14.94SFR 197-380-049 $14.94SFR 197-380-052 $14.94SFR 197-380-053 $14.94SFR 197-380-054 $14.94SFR 197-390-001 $14.94SFR 197-390-002 $14.94SFR 197-390-003 $14.94SFR 197-390-004 $14.94SFR 197-390-005 $14.94SFR 197-390-006 $14.94SFR 197-390-007 $14.94SFR 197-390-008 $14.94SFR - 110 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 197-390-011 $14.94SFR 197-390-012 $14.94SFR 197-390-013 $14.94SFR 197-390-014 $14.94SFR 197-390-015 $14.94SFR 197-390-016 $14.94SFR 197-390-017 $14.94SFR 197-390-018 $14.94SFR 197-390-020 $14.94SFR 197-400-001 $14.94SFR 197-400-002 $14.94SFR 197-400-003 $14.94SFR 197-400-004 $14.94SFR 197-400-007 $14.94SFR 197-400-008 $14.94SFR 197-400-009 $7.46VSFR 197-400-010 $14.94SFR 197-400-011 $14.94SFR 197-400-012 $14.94SFR 197-400-013 $14.94SFR 197-400-014 $14.94SFR 197-420-006 $7.46CONDO 197-420-007 $7.46CONDO 197-420-008 $7.46CONDO 197-420-009 $7.46CONDO 197-420-010 $7.46CONDO 197-420-011 $7.46CONDO 197-420-012 $7.46CONDO 197-420-013 $7.46CONDO 197-420-014 $7.46CONDO 197-420-015 $7.46CONDO 197-420-016 $7.46CONDO 197-420-017 $7.46CONDO 197-420-018 $7.46CONDO 197-420-019 $7.46CONDO 197-420-020 $7.46CONDO 197-420-021 $7.46CONDO 197-420-022 $7.46CONDO 197-420-023 $7.46CONDO 197-420-024 $7.46CONDO 197-420-025 $7.46CONDO 197-420-026 $7.46CONDO 197-420-027 $7.46CONDO 197-420-028 $7.46CONDO 197-420-029 $7.46CONDO 197-420-030 $7.46CONDO 197-420-031 $7.46CONDO 197-420-032 $7.46CONDO 197-420-033 $7.46CONDO 197-420-034 $7.46CONDO 197-420-035 $7.46CONDO 197-430-001 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 197-430-002 $7.46CONDO 197-430-003 $7.46CONDO 197-430-004 $7.46CONDO 197-430-005 $7.46CONDO 197-430-006 $7.46CONDO 197-430-007 $7.46CONDO 197-430-008 $7.46CONDO 197-430-009 $7.46CONDO 197-430-010 $7.46CONDO 197-470-001 $14.94SFR 197-470-002 $14.94SFR 197-470-003 $14.94SFR 197-470-004 $14.94SFR 197-470-005 $14.94SFR 197-470-006 $14.94SFR 197-470-007 $14.94SFR 197-470-008 $14.94SFR 197-470-009 $14.94SFR 197-470-010 $14.94SFR 197-470-011 $14.94SFR 197-470-012 $14.94SFR 197-470-013 $14.94SFR 197-470-014 $14.94SFR 197-470-015 $14.94SFR 197-470-016 $14.94SFR 197-470-017 $14.94SFR 197-470-018 $14.94SFR 197-470-019 $14.94SFR 197-470-021 $14.94SFR 197-470-031 $14.94SFR 197-470-033 $14.94SFR 197-480-001 $14.94SFR 197-480-002 $14.94SFR 197-480-003 $14.94SFR 197-480-004 $14.94SFR 197-480-005 $14.94SFR 198-010-013 $74.70COM 198-010-016 $74.70COM 198-010-019 $74.70COM 198-010-020 $74.70COM 198-020-030 $14.94SFR 198-020-032 $14.94SFR 198-020-033 $14.94SFR 198-020-034 $14.94SFR 198-020-035 $14.94SFR 198-020-039 $14.94SFR 198-020-040 $14.94SFR 198-020-042 $14.94SFR 198-020-043 $14.94SFR 198-020-044 $14.94SFR 198-020-045 $14.94SFR 198-020-046 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 198-020-047 $14.94SFR 198-020-048 $14.94SFR 198-040-026 $14.94SFR 198-040-027 $14.94SFR 198-040-028 $14.94SFR 198-040-029 $14.94SFR 198-040-030 $14.94SFR 198-040-031 $14.94SFR 198-040-032 $14.94SFR 198-040-033 $14.94SFR 198-040-034 $14.94SFR 198-040-035 $14.94SFR 198-040-036 $14.94SFR 198-050-041 $14.94SFR 198-050-042 $14.94SFR 198-050-043 $14.94SFR 198-050-044 $14.94SFR 198-050-045 $14.94SFR 198-050-046 $14.94SFR 198-050-047 $14.94SFR 198-061-016 $74.70COM 198-062-002 $14.94SFR 198-062-003 $14.94SFR 198-062-004 $14.94SFR 198-062-005 $14.94SFR 198-062-006 $14.94SFR 198-062-007 $14.94SFR 198-062-008 $14.94SFR 198-062-009 $14.94SFR 198-062-010 $14.94SFR 198-062-011 $14.94SFR 198-063-001 $14.94SFR 198-063-002 $14.94SFR 198-063-003 $14.94SFR 198-063-004 $14.94SFR 198-063-005 $14.94SFR 198-063-006 $14.94SFR 198-063-007 $14.94SFR 198-063-008 $14.94SFR 198-063-009 $14.94SFR 198-063-010 $14.94SFR 198-063-011 $14.94SFR 198-063-012 $14.94SFR 198-063-013 $14.94SFR 198-081-021 $14.94SFR 198-081-022 $14.94SFR 198-111-037 $14.94SFR 198-140-024 $14.94SFR 198-140-025 $14.94SFR 198-140-026 $14.94SFR 198-140-027 $14.94SFR 198-140-028 $14.94SFR - 111 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 198-140-029 $14.94SFR 198-140-030 $14.94SFR 198-140-031 $14.94SFR 198-140-032 $14.94SFR 198-140-033 $14.94SFR 198-140-034 $14.94SFR 198-140-035 $14.94SFR 198-160-035 $14.94SFR 198-160-036 $14.94SFR 198-160-037 $14.94SFR 198-190-040 $14.94SFR 198-190-041 $14.94SFR 199-030-064 $7.46MISC 199-030-065 $14.94SFR 199-030-066 $7.46MISC 201-091-001 $14.94SFR 201-091-002 $14.94SFR 201-091-003 $14.94SFR 201-091-004 $14.94SFR 201-091-005 $14.94SFR 201-091-006 $14.94SFR 201-091-007 $14.94SFR 201-091-008 $14.94SFR 201-091-009 $14.94SFR 201-091-010 $14.94SFR 201-091-011 $14.94SFR 201-091-012 $14.94SFR 201-091-013 $14.94SFR 201-091-014 $14.94SFR 201-092-001 $14.94SFR 201-092-002 $14.94SFR 201-092-003 $14.94SFR 201-092-004 $14.94SFR 201-092-005 $14.94SFR 201-092-006 $14.94SFR 201-092-007 $14.94SFR 201-092-008 $14.94SFR 201-092-009 $14.94SFR 203-050-081 $74.70COM 203-050-082 $74.70COM 203-050-083 $74.70COM 203-050-084 $74.70COM 203-050-090 $74.70COM 203-061-001 $7.46CONDO 203-061-002 $7.46CONDO 203-061-003 $7.46CONDO 203-061-004 $7.46CONDO 203-061-005 $7.46CONDO 203-061-006 $7.46CONDO 203-061-007 $7.46CONDO 203-061-008 $7.46CONDO 203-061-009 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-061-010 $7.46CONDO 203-061-011 $7.46CONDO 203-061-012 $7.46CONDO 203-061-013 $7.46CONDO 203-061-014 $7.46CONDO 203-061-015 $7.46CONDO 203-061-016 $7.46CONDO 203-061-017 $7.46CONDO 203-061-018 $7.46CONDO 203-061-019 $7.46CONDO 203-061-020 $7.46CONDO 203-061-021 $7.46CONDO 203-061-022 $7.46CONDO 203-061-023 $7.46CONDO 203-061-024 $7.46CONDO 203-061-025 $7.46CONDO 203-061-026 $7.46CONDO 203-061-027 $7.46CONDO 203-061-028 $7.46CONDO 203-061-029 $7.46CONDO 203-061-030 $7.46CONDO 203-061-031 $7.46CONDO 203-061-032 $7.46CONDO 203-061-033 $7.46CONDO 203-061-034 $7.46CONDO 203-061-035 $7.46CONDO 203-061-036 $7.46CONDO 203-061-037 $7.46CONDO 203-061-038 $7.46CONDO 203-061-039 $7.46CONDO 203-061-040 $7.46CONDO 203-061-041 $7.46CONDO 203-061-042 $7.46CONDO 203-061-043 $7.46CONDO 203-061-044 $7.46CONDO 203-061-045 $7.46CONDO 203-061-046 $7.46CONDO 203-061-047 $7.46CONDO 203-061-048 $7.46CONDO 203-061-049 $7.46CONDO 203-061-050 $7.46CONDO 203-061-051 $7.46CONDO 203-061-052 $7.46CONDO 203-061-053 $7.46CONDO 203-061-054 $7.46CONDO 203-061-055 $7.46CONDO 203-061-056 $7.46CONDO 203-061-057 $7.46CONDO 203-061-058 $7.46CONDO 203-061-059 $7.46CONDO 203-061-060 $7.46CONDO 203-061-061 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-061-062 $7.46CONDO 203-061-063 $7.46CONDO 203-061-064 $7.46CONDO 203-061-065 $7.46CONDO 203-071-001 $7.46CONDO 203-071-002 $7.46CONDO 203-071-003 $7.46CONDO 203-071-004 $7.46CONDO 203-071-005 $7.46CONDO 203-071-006 $7.46CONDO 203-071-007 $7.46CONDO 203-071-008 $7.46CONDO 203-071-009 $7.46CONDO 203-071-010 $7.46CONDO 203-071-011 $7.46CONDO 203-071-012 $7.46CONDO 203-071-013 $7.46CONDO 203-071-014 $7.46CONDO 203-071-015 $7.46CONDO 203-071-016 $7.46CONDO 203-071-017 $7.46CONDO 203-071-018 $7.46CONDO 203-071-019 $7.46CONDO 203-071-020 $7.46CONDO 203-071-021 $7.46CONDO 203-071-022 $7.46CONDO 203-071-023 $7.46CONDO 203-071-024 $7.46CONDO 203-071-025 $7.46CONDO 203-071-026 $7.46CONDO 203-071-027 $7.46CONDO 203-071-028 $7.46CONDO 203-071-029 $7.46CONDO 203-071-030 $7.46CONDO 203-071-031 $7.46CONDO 203-071-032 $7.46CONDO 203-071-033 $7.46CONDO 203-071-034 $7.46CONDO 203-071-035 $7.46CONDO 203-071-036 $7.46CONDO 203-071-037 $7.46CONDO 203-071-038 $7.46CONDO 203-071-039 $7.46CONDO 203-071-040 $7.46CONDO 203-071-041 $7.46CONDO 203-071-042 $7.46CONDO 203-071-043 $7.46CONDO 203-071-044 $7.46CONDO 203-071-045 $7.46CONDO 203-071-046 $7.46CONDO 203-071-047 $7.46CONDO 203-071-048 $7.46CONDO - 112 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-071-049 $7.46CONDO 203-071-050 $7.46CONDO 203-071-051 $7.46CONDO 203-071-052 $7.46CONDO 203-071-053 $7.46CONDO 203-071-054 $7.46CONDO 203-071-055 $7.46CONDO 203-071-056 $7.46CONDO 203-071-057 $7.46CONDO 203-071-058 $7.46CONDO 203-071-059 $7.46CONDO 203-071-060 $7.46CONDO 203-071-061 $7.46CONDO 203-071-062 $7.46CONDO 203-071-063 $7.46CONDO 203-071-064 $7.46CONDO 203-071-065 $7.46CONDO 203-071-066 $7.46CONDO 203-071-067 $7.46CONDO 203-071-068 $7.46CONDO 203-071-069 $7.46CONDO 203-071-070 $7.46CONDO 203-071-071 $7.46CONDO 203-071-072 $7.46CONDO 203-071-073 $7.46CONDO 203-071-074 $7.46CONDO 203-071-075 $7.46CONDO 203-071-076 $7.46CONDO 203-071-077 $7.46CONDO 203-071-078 $7.46CONDO 203-071-079 $7.46CONDO 203-071-080 $7.46CONDO 203-071-081 $7.46CONDO 203-071-082 $7.46CONDO 203-071-083 $7.46CONDO 203-071-084 $7.46CONDO 203-071-085 $7.46CONDO 203-251-001 $14.94SFR 203-251-002 $14.94SFR 203-251-003 $14.94SFR 203-251-004 $14.94SFR 203-251-005 $14.94SFR 203-251-006 $14.94SFR 203-251-007 $14.94SFR 203-251-008 $14.94SFR 203-251-009 $14.94SFR 203-251-010 $14.94SFR 203-251-011 $14.94SFR 203-252-001 $14.94SFR 203-252-002 $14.94SFR 203-252-003 $14.94SFR 203-253-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-254-001 $14.94SFR 203-254-002 $14.94SFR 203-254-003 $14.94SFR 203-254-004 $14.94SFR 203-255-004 $14.94SFR 203-255-005 $14.94SFR 203-261-001 $14.94SFR 203-261-002 $14.94SFR 203-261-003 $14.94SFR 203-261-004 $14.94SFR 203-261-005 $14.94SFR 203-261-006 $14.94SFR 203-261-007 $14.94SFR 203-261-008 $14.94SFR 203-261-009 $14.94SFR 203-261-010 $14.94SFR 203-261-011 $14.94SFR 203-261-012 $14.94SFR 203-261-013 $14.94SFR 203-261-014 $14.94SFR 203-261-015 $14.94SFR 203-262-001 $14.94SFR 203-262-002 $14.94SFR 203-262-003 $14.94SFR 203-262-004 $14.94SFR 203-262-005 $14.94SFR 203-262-006 $14.94SFR 203-262-007 $14.94SFR 203-271-001 $14.94SFR 203-271-002 $14.94SFR 203-271-003 $14.94SFR 203-271-004 $14.94SFR 203-271-005 $14.94SFR 203-271-006 $14.94SFR 203-271-007 $14.94SFR 203-271-008 $14.94SFR 203-271-009 $14.94SFR 203-271-010 $14.94SFR 203-271-011 $14.94SFR 203-271-012 $14.94SFR 203-271-013 $14.94SFR 203-271-014 $14.94SFR 203-271-015 $14.94SFR 203-271-016 $14.94SFR 203-272-001 $14.94SFR 203-272-002 $14.94SFR 203-272-003 $14.94SFR 203-272-004 $14.94SFR 203-273-001 $14.94SFR 203-273-002 $14.94SFR 203-280-001 $14.94SFR 203-280-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-280-003 $14.94SFR 203-280-004 $14.94SFR 203-280-006 $14.94SFR 203-280-007 $14.94SFR 203-280-008 $14.94SFR 203-280-009 $14.94SFR 203-280-010 $14.94SFR 203-280-011 $14.94SFR 203-280-013 $14.94SFR 203-290-001 $14.94SFR 203-290-002 $14.94SFR 203-290-003 $14.94SFR 203-290-004 $14.94SFR 203-290-005 $14.94SFR 203-290-006 $14.94SFR 203-290-007 $14.94SFR 203-290-008 $14.94SFR 203-290-009 $14.94SFR 203-290-010 $14.94SFR 203-290-012 $14.94SFR 203-290-013 $14.94SFR 203-290-014 $14.94SFR 203-290-016 $14.94SFR 203-290-018 $14.94SFR 203-290-019 $14.94SFR 203-290-020 $14.94SFR 203-290-021 $14.94SFR 203-290-022 $14.94SFR 203-290-023 $14.94SFR 203-290-024 $14.94SFR 203-290-025 $14.94SFR 203-290-026 $14.94SFR 203-290-027 $14.94SFR 203-290-030 $14.94SFR 203-290-031 $14.94SFR 203-300-001 $14.94SFR 203-300-002 $14.94SFR 203-300-003 $14.94SFR 203-300-004 $14.94SFR 203-300-005 $14.94SFR 203-300-006 $14.94SFR 203-300-007 $14.94SFR 203-300-008 $14.94SFR 203-300-010 $14.94SFR 203-300-011 $14.94SFR 203-300-012 $14.94SFR 203-300-013 $14.94SFR 203-300-014 $14.94SFR 203-300-015 $14.94SFR 203-300-016 $14.94SFR 203-300-017 $14.94SFR 203-300-018 $14.94SFR - 113 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-300-019 $14.94SFR 203-311-001 $14.94SFR 203-311-002 $14.94SFR 203-311-003 $14.94SFR 203-311-004 $14.94SFR 203-311-005 $14.94SFR 203-311-006 $14.94SFR 203-311-007 $14.94SFR 203-311-008 $14.94SFR 203-311-009 $14.94SFR 203-311-010 $14.94SFR 203-311-011 $14.94SFR 203-311-012 $14.94SFR 203-311-013 $14.94SFR 203-311-014 $14.94SFR 203-312-001 $14.94SFR 203-312-002 $14.94SFR 203-312-003 $14.94SFR 203-312-004 $14.94SFR 203-312-008 $14.94SFR 203-312-010 $14.94SFR 203-320-001 $14.94SFR 203-320-002 $14.94SFR 203-320-003 $14.94SFR 203-320-004 $14.94SFR 203-320-005 $14.94SFR 203-320-006 $14.94SFR 203-320-007 $14.94SFR 203-320-008 $14.94SFR 203-320-009 $14.94SFR 203-320-010 $14.94SFR 203-320-011 $14.94SFR 203-320-012 $14.94SFR 203-320-013 $14.94SFR 203-320-014 $14.94SFR 203-330-001 $14.94SFR 203-330-002 $14.94SFR 203-330-003 $14.94SFR 203-330-004 $14.94SFR 203-330-005 $14.94SFR 203-330-006 $14.94SFR 203-330-007 $14.94SFR 203-330-008 $14.94SFR 203-330-009 $14.94SFR 203-330-010 $14.94SFR 203-330-011 $14.94SFR 203-330-012 $14.94SFR 203-330-013 $14.94SFR 203-330-014 $14.94SFR 203-330-015 $14.94SFR 203-330-016 $14.94SFR 203-330-017 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-330-018 $14.94SFR 203-330-019 $14.94SFR 203-330-020 $14.94SFR 203-330-021 $14.94SFR 203-330-022 $14.94SFR 203-330-023 $14.94SFR 203-330-024 $14.94SFR 203-340-004 $14.94SFR 203-340-005 $14.94SFR 203-340-006 $14.94SFR 203-340-007 $14.94SFR 203-340-008 $14.94SFR 203-340-009 $14.94SFR 203-340-010 $14.94SFR 203-340-011 $14.94SFR 203-340-012 $14.94SFR 203-340-013 $14.94SFR 203-340-015 $14.94SFR 203-340-016 $14.94SFR 203-350-001 $14.94SFR 203-350-002 $14.94SFR 203-350-003 $14.94SFR 203-350-004 $14.94SFR 203-350-005 $14.94SFR 203-350-006 $14.94SFR 203-350-009 $14.94SFR 203-350-010 $14.94SFR 203-350-011 $14.94SFR 203-350-012 $14.94SFR 203-350-013 $14.94SFR 203-350-014 $14.94SFR 203-350-015 $14.94SFR 203-350-016 $14.94SFR 203-350-017 $14.94SFR 203-350-019 $14.94SFR 203-360-029 $14.94SFR 203-360-032 $14.94SFR 203-360-033 $14.94SFR 203-360-034 $14.94SFR 203-360-035 $14.94SFR 203-360-036 $14.94SFR 203-360-037 $14.94SFR 203-360-038 $14.94SFR 203-360-039 $14.94SFR 203-360-041 $14.94SFR 203-360-042 $14.94SFR 203-360-043 $14.94SFR 203-360-044 $14.94SFR 203-360-045 $14.94SFR 203-360-046 $14.94SFR 203-360-047 $14.94SFR 203-360-048 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-360-049 $14.94SFR 203-360-050 $14.94SFR 203-360-051 $14.94SFR 203-360-052 $14.94SFR 203-360-053 $14.94SFR 203-360-054 $14.94SFR 203-360-055 $14.94SFR 203-360-056 $14.94SFR 203-360-057 $14.94SFR 203-360-058 $14.94SFR 203-360-059 $14.94SFR 203-360-060 $14.94SFR 203-360-061 $14.94SFR 203-370-002 $74.70COM 203-370-006 $74.70COM 203-371-001 $74.70COM 203-381-001 $14.94SFR 203-381-002 $14.94SFR 203-381-003 $14.94SFR 203-381-004 $14.94SFR 203-381-005 $14.94SFR 203-381-006 $14.94SFR 203-381-007 $14.94SFR 203-381-008 $14.94SFR 203-381-011 $14.94SFR 203-381-012 $14.94SFR 203-381-013 $14.94SFR 203-381-014 $14.94SFR 203-381-016 $14.94SFR 203-382-001 $14.94SFR 203-382-002 $14.94SFR 203-382-003 $14.94SFR 203-382-004 $14.94SFR 203-382-005 $14.94SFR 203-382-007 $14.94SFR 203-382-008 $14.94SFR 203-382-009 $14.94SFR 203-382-010 $14.94SFR 203-382-011 $14.94SFR 203-382-012 $14.94SFR 203-382-013 $14.94SFR 203-382-014 $14.94SFR 203-382-015 $14.94SFR 203-391-001 $14.94SFR 203-391-002 $14.94SFR 203-391-003 $14.94SFR 203-391-004 $14.94SFR 203-391-005 $14.94SFR 203-391-006 $14.94SFR 203-391-007 $14.94SFR 203-391-008 $14.94SFR 203-391-009 $14.94SFR - 114 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-391-010 $14.94SFR 203-391-011 $14.94SFR 203-392-001 $14.94SFR 203-392-002 $14.94SFR 203-392-003 $14.94SFR 203-392-004 $14.94SFR 203-392-005 $14.94SFR 203-392-008 $14.94SFR 203-392-009 $14.94SFR 203-392-010 $14.94SFR 203-393-003 $14.94SFR 203-393-004 $14.94SFR 203-393-005 $14.94SFR 203-401-001 $14.94SFR 203-401-002 $14.94SFR 203-401-003 $14.94SFR 203-401-004 $14.94SFR 203-401-005 $14.94SFR 203-401-006 $14.94SFR 203-401-007 $14.94SFR 203-401-008 $14.94SFR 203-401-009 $14.94SFR 203-401-010 $14.94SFR 203-401-011 $14.94SFR 203-401-012 $14.94SFR 203-401-013 $14.94SFR 203-401-014 $14.94SFR 203-401-015 $14.94SFR 203-401-016 $14.94SFR 203-401-017 $14.94SFR 203-402-001 $14.94SFR 203-402-002 $14.94SFR 203-402-003 $14.94SFR 203-402-004 $14.94SFR 203-402-005 $14.94SFR 203-402-006 $14.94SFR 203-402-007 $14.94SFR 203-410-018 $14.94SFR 203-410-019 $7.46VSFR 203-410-020 $7.46VSFR 203-410-021 $14.94SFR 203-410-022 $14.94SFR 203-421-001 $14.94SFR 203-421-002 $14.94SFR 203-421-003 $14.94SFR 203-421-004 $14.94SFR 203-421-005 $14.94SFR 203-422-001 $14.94SFR 203-422-002 $14.94SFR 203-422-003 $14.94SFR 203-422-004 $14.94SFR 203-422-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-422-007 $14.94SFR 203-422-008 $14.94SFR 203-422-009 $14.94SFR 203-422-016 $14.94SFR 203-422-017 $14.94SFR 203-422-019 $14.94SFR 203-422-023 $14.94SFR 203-422-025 $14.94SFR 203-422-027 $14.94SFR 203-422-028 $14.94SFR 203-422-029 $14.94SFR 203-422-031 $14.94SFR 203-422-033 $14.94SFR 203-422-035 $14.94SFR 203-422-037 $14.94SFR 203-431-001 $14.94SFR 203-431-002 $14.94SFR 203-431-003 $14.94SFR 203-431-004 $14.94SFR 203-431-005 $14.94SFR 203-431-006 $14.94SFR 203-432-001 $14.94SFR 203-432-002 $14.94SFR 203-432-003 $14.94SFR 203-432-005 $14.94SFR 203-432-006 $14.94SFR 203-432-007 $14.94SFR 203-432-008 $14.94SFR 203-432-009 $14.94SFR 203-432-010 $14.94SFR 203-432-011 $14.94SFR 203-432-012 $14.94SFR 203-432-013 $14.94SFR 203-432-014 $14.94SFR 203-432-015 $14.94SFR 203-432-016 $14.94SFR 203-432-017 $14.94SFR 203-432-018 $14.94SFR 203-441-001 $14.94SFR 203-441-003 $14.94SFR 203-441-005 $14.94SFR 203-442-001 $14.94SFR 203-443-001 $14.94SFR 203-443-007 $14.94SFR 203-443-008 $14.94SFR 203-443-009 $14.94SFR 203-443-015 $14.94SFR 203-443-017 $14.94SFR 203-443-018 $14.94SFR 203-443-019 $14.94SFR 203-443-020 $14.94SFR 203-443-021 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-443-022 $14.94SFR 203-443-023 $14.94SFR 203-443-024 $14.94SFR 203-443-025 $14.94SFR 203-443-032 $14.94SFR 203-443-033 $14.94SFR 203-443-035 $14.94SFR 203-443-036 $14.94SFR 203-450-005 $14.94SFR 203-460-009 $74.70COM 203-471-001 $14.94SFR 203-471-002 $14.94SFR 203-471-003 $14.94SFR 203-471-004 $14.94SFR 203-471-005 $14.94SFR 203-471-006 $14.94SFR 203-471-007 $14.94SFR 203-471-008 $14.94SFR 203-471-009 $14.94SFR 203-471-010 $14.94SFR 203-472-002 $74.70COM 203-472-003 $14.94SFR 203-472-004 $14.94SFR 203-472-005 $14.94SFR 203-472-006 $14.94SFR 203-472-007 $14.94SFR 203-472-008 $14.94SFR 203-472-009 $14.94SFR 203-472-010 $14.94SFR 203-472-011 $14.94SFR 203-472-012 $14.94SFR 203-472-013 $14.94SFR 203-472-014 $14.94SFR 203-472-015 $14.94SFR 203-472-016 $14.94SFR 203-472-017 $14.94SFR 203-472-018 $14.94SFR 203-472-019 $14.94SFR 203-472-021 $14.94SFR 203-472-022 $14.94SFR 203-472-023 $14.94SFR 203-472-024 $14.94SFR 203-472-025 $14.94SFR 203-472-026 $14.94SFR 203-472-027 $14.94SFR 203-472-028 $14.94SFR 203-472-029 $14.94SFR 203-472-030 $14.94SFR 203-472-031 $14.94SFR 203-472-032 $14.94SFR 203-472-033 $14.94SFR 203-472-034 $14.94SFR - 115 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-472-035 $14.94SFR 203-472-036 $14.94SFR 203-472-037 $14.94SFR 203-472-038 $14.94SFR 203-472-039 $14.94SFR 203-472-040 $14.94SFR 203-472-041 $14.94SFR 203-472-042 $14.94SFR 203-481-001 $14.94SFR 203-481-002 $14.94SFR 203-481-003 $14.94SFR 203-481-004 $14.94SFR 203-481-005 $14.94SFR 203-481-006 $14.94SFR 203-481-007 $14.94SFR 203-481-008 $14.94SFR 203-481-009 $14.94SFR 203-481-010 $14.94SFR 203-482-002 $14.94SFR 203-482-003 $14.94SFR 203-482-004 $14.94SFR 203-482-005 $14.94SFR 203-482-006 $14.94SFR 203-482-007 $14.94SFR 203-482-008 $14.94SFR 203-482-009 $14.94SFR 203-482-010 $14.94SFR 203-482-011 $14.94SFR 203-482-012 $14.94SFR 203-482-013 $14.94SFR 203-482-014 $14.94SFR 203-482-015 $14.94SFR 203-482-016 $14.94SFR 203-482-017 $14.94SFR 203-482-018 $14.94SFR 203-482-019 $14.94SFR 203-482-020 $14.94SFR 203-482-021 $14.94SFR 203-482-022 $14.94SFR 203-491-001 $14.94SFR 203-491-002 $14.94SFR 203-491-003 $14.94SFR 203-491-004 $14.94SFR 203-491-005 $14.94SFR 203-492-001 $14.94SFR 203-493-001 $14.94SFR 203-493-002 $14.94SFR 203-493-003 $14.94SFR 203-493-004 $14.94SFR 203-493-005 $14.94SFR 203-493-006 $14.94SFR 203-493-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-493-008 $14.94SFR 203-493-009 $14.94SFR 203-493-010 $14.94SFR 203-501-019 $14.94SFR 203-501-020 $14.94SFR 203-501-023 $14.94SFR 203-501-024 $14.94SFR 203-501-025 $14.94SFR 203-501-026 $14.94SFR 203-501-027 $14.94SFR 203-501-028 $14.94SFR 203-501-032 $14.94SFR 203-501-033 $14.94SFR 203-501-035 $74.70COM 203-501-038 $14.94SFR 203-501-041 $14.94SFR 203-502-002 $14.94SFR 203-502-003 $14.94SFR 203-502-004 $14.94SFR 203-502-005 $14.94SFR 203-502-006 $14.94SFR 203-502-009 $14.94SFR 203-502-010 $14.94SFR 203-502-011 $14.94SFR 203-502-012 $14.94SFR 203-502-013 $14.94SFR 203-502-014 $14.94SFR 203-502-016 $14.94SFR 203-502-017 $14.94SFR 203-502-018 $14.94SFR 203-502-019 $14.94SFR 203-502-020 $14.94SFR 203-502-021 $14.94SFR 203-502-022 $14.94SFR 203-502-023 $14.94SFR 203-502-024 $14.94SFR 203-502-025 $14.94SFR 203-502-026 $14.94SFR 203-502-027 $14.94SFR 203-502-028 $14.94SFR 203-502-030 $14.94SFR 203-502-031 $14.94SFR 203-502-032 $14.94SFR 203-502-033 $14.94SFR 203-502-034 $14.94SFR 203-502-051 $14.94SFR 203-502-052 $14.94SFR 203-502-053 $14.94SFR 203-502-054 $14.94SFR 203-502-055 $14.94SFR 203-502-056 $14.94SFR 203-502-057 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-502-058 $14.94SFR 203-502-059 $14.94SFR 203-502-060 $14.94SFR 203-502-061 $14.94SFR 203-502-062 $14.94SFR 203-502-063 $14.94SFR 203-502-064 $14.94SFR 203-502-065 $14.94SFR 203-502-066 $14.94SFR 203-502-068 $14.94SFR 203-502-070 $74.70COM 203-502-071 $14.94SFR 203-510-003 $14.94SFR 203-510-004 $14.94SFR 203-510-012 $14.94SFR 203-510-028 $14.94SFR 203-510-029 $14.94SFR 203-510-030 $14.94SFR 203-510-031 $14.94SFR 203-510-032 $14.94SFR 203-510-033 $14.94SFR 203-510-034 $14.94SFR 203-510-035 $14.94SFR 203-510-036 $14.94SFR 203-510-037 $14.94SFR 203-510-040 $14.94SFR 203-510-041 $14.94SFR 203-510-042 $14.94SFR 203-510-043 $14.94SFR 203-510-044 $14.94SFR 203-510-045 $14.94SFR 203-510-046 $14.94SFR 203-510-047 $14.94SFR 203-510-048 $14.94SFR 203-510-049 $14.94SFR 203-520-002 $74.70COM 203-520-004 $74.70COM 203-530-001 $14.94SFR 203-530-002 $14.94SFR 203-530-003 $14.94SFR 203-530-004 $14.94SFR 203-530-005 $14.94SFR 203-530-006 $14.94SFR 203-530-007 $14.94SFR 203-530-008 $14.94SFR 203-530-009 $14.94SFR 203-530-010 $14.94SFR 203-530-011 $14.94SFR 203-530-012 $14.94SFR 203-530-013 $14.94SFR 203-530-014 $14.94SFR 203-530-015 $14.94SFR - 116 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-530-016 $14.94SFR 203-530-017 $14.94SFR 203-530-018 $14.94SFR 203-530-019 $14.94SFR 203-530-020 $14.94SFR 203-530-021 $14.94SFR 203-530-022 $14.94SFR 203-530-023 $14.94SFR 203-530-024 $14.94SFR 203-530-025 $14.94SFR 203-530-026 $7.46VSFR 203-530-029 $14.94SFR 203-530-030 $14.94SFR 203-530-031 $14.94SFR 203-530-032 $14.94SFR 203-530-033 $14.94SFR 203-530-034 $14.94SFR 203-530-035 $14.94SFR 203-530-036 $14.94SFR 203-530-037 $14.94SFR 203-530-038 $14.94SFR 203-530-039 $14.94SFR 203-530-040 $14.94SFR 203-530-041 $14.94SFR 203-530-042 $14.94SFR 203-530-043 $14.94SFR 203-530-044 $14.94SFR 203-530-045 $14.94SFR 203-530-046 $14.94SFR 203-530-047 $14.94SFR 203-530-048 $14.94SFR 203-530-049 $14.94SFR 203-530-050 $14.94SFR 203-530-051 $14.94SFR 203-530-052 $14.94SFR 203-530-055 $14.94SFR 203-530-056 $14.94SFR 203-530-057 $14.94SFR 203-530-058 $14.94SFR 203-530-059 $14.94SFR 203-530-060 $14.94SFR 203-530-061 $14.94SFR 203-530-062 $14.94SFR 203-530-063 $14.94SFR 203-530-064 $14.94SFR 203-530-065 $14.94SFR 203-530-066 $14.94SFR 203-530-067 $14.94SFR 203-530-068 $14.94SFR 203-530-069 $14.94SFR 203-530-070 $14.94SFR 203-530-071 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-530-072 $14.94SFR 203-530-073 $14.94SFR 203-530-074 $14.94SFR 203-530-075 $14.94SFR 203-530-076 $14.94SFR 203-530-078 $14.94SFR 203-530-079 $14.94SFR 203-530-080 $14.94SFR 203-530-081 $7.46VSFR 203-530-082 $14.94SFR 203-530-083 $14.94SFR 203-530-084 $14.94SFR 203-530-085 $14.94SFR 203-530-086 $14.94SFR 203-530-087 $14.94SFR 203-530-088 $14.94SFR 203-530-089 $14.94SFR 203-530-090 $14.94SFR 203-530-091 $14.94SFR 203-530-092 $14.94SFR 203-530-093 $14.94SFR 203-530-094 $14.94SFR 203-530-095 $14.94SFR 203-530-096 $14.94SFR 203-530-097 $14.94SFR 203-530-098 $14.94SFR 203-530-099 $7.46VSFR 203-530-100 $14.94SFR 203-530-101 $14.94SFR 203-530-102 $14.94SFR 203-530-105 $14.94SFR 203-530-106 $74.70COM 203-530-107 $14.94SFR 203-530-108 $14.94SFR 203-530-109 $14.94SFR 203-530-110 $14.94SFR 203-540-001 $14.94SFR 203-540-002 $14.94SFR 203-540-003 $14.94SFR 203-540-004 $14.94SFR 203-540-005 $14.94SFR 203-540-006 $14.94SFR 203-540-007 $14.94SFR 203-540-008 $14.94SFR 203-540-009 $14.94SFR 203-540-010 $14.94SFR 203-540-011 $14.94SFR 203-540-012 $14.94SFR 203-540-013 $14.94SFR 203-540-014 $14.94SFR 203-540-015 $14.94SFR 203-540-016 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-540-017 $14.94SFR 203-540-018 $14.94SFR 203-540-019 $14.94SFR 203-540-020 $14.94SFR 203-540-021 $14.94SFR 203-540-022 $14.94SFR 203-540-023 $14.94SFR 203-540-024 $14.94SFR 203-540-025 $14.94SFR 203-540-026 $14.94SFR 203-540-027 $14.94SFR 203-540-028 $14.94SFR 203-540-029 $14.94SFR 203-540-030 $14.94SFR 203-540-031 $14.94SFR 203-540-032 $14.94SFR 203-540-033 $14.94SFR 203-540-034 $14.94SFR 203-540-035 $14.94SFR 203-540-040 $14.94SFR 203-551-001 $14.94SFR 203-551-002 $14.94SFR 203-551-003 $14.94SFR 203-551-004 $14.94SFR 203-551-005 $14.94SFR 203-551-006 $14.94SFR 203-551-009 $14.94SFR 203-551-010 $14.94SFR 203-551-019 $14.94SFR 203-551-021 $14.94SFR 203-551-022 $14.94SFR 203-551-023 $14.94SFR 203-551-024 $14.94SFR 203-551-025 $14.94SFR 203-551-026 $14.94SFR 203-551-028 $14.94SFR 203-551-033 $14.94SFR 203-551-034 $14.94SFR 203-551-035 $14.94SFR 203-552-001 $14.94SFR 203-552-002 $14.94SFR 203-552-003 $14.94SFR 203-552-004 $14.94SFR 203-552-005 $14.94SFR 203-552-006 $14.94SFR 203-552-011 $14.94SFR 203-552-012 $14.94SFR 203-552-014 $14.94SFR 203-552-015 $14.94SFR 203-553-001 $14.94SFR 203-553-002 $14.94SFR 203-553-003 $14.94SFR - 117 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-553-004 $14.94SFR 203-560-011 $14.94SFR 203-560-019 $14.94SFR 203-560-020 $14.94SFR 203-560-022 $14.94SFR 203-560-024 $14.94SFR 203-560-025 $14.94SFR 203-560-027 $14.94SFR 203-560-030 $14.94SFR 203-560-031 $14.94SFR 203-560-032 $14.94SFR 203-560-033 $14.94SFR 203-560-035 $14.94SFR 203-560-036 $14.94SFR 203-571-002 $14.94SFR 203-571-003 $14.94SFR 203-571-004 $14.94SFR 203-571-005 $14.94SFR 203-571-006 $14.94SFR 203-571-007 $14.94SFR 203-571-008 $14.94SFR 203-571-009 $14.94SFR 203-571-010 $14.94SFR 203-571-011 $14.94SFR 203-571-012 $14.94SFR 203-571-013 $14.94SFR 203-571-014 $14.94SFR 203-571-015 $14.94SFR 203-571-016 $14.94SFR 203-571-017 $14.94SFR 203-571-021 $14.94SFR 203-571-022 $14.94SFR 203-571-023 $14.94SFR 203-572-001 $14.94SFR 203-572-002 $14.94SFR 203-572-003 $14.94SFR 203-572-004 $14.94SFR 203-572-005 $14.94SFR 203-572-006 $14.94SFR 203-572-007 $14.94SFR 203-572-008 $14.94SFR 203-572-009 $14.94SFR 203-572-010 $14.94SFR 203-572-011 $14.94SFR 203-572-012 $14.94SFR 203-572-013 $14.94SFR 203-572-014 $14.94SFR 203-572-015 $14.94SFR 203-572-016 $14.94SFR 203-572-017 $14.94SFR 203-572-018 $14.94SFR 203-572-019 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-572-020 $14.94SFR 203-572-023 $14.94SFR 203-580-003 $14.94SFR 203-580-006 $14.94SFR 203-580-009 $14.94SFR 203-580-010 $14.94SFR 203-580-013 $14.94SFR 203-580-014 $14.94SFR 203-580-015 $14.94SFR 203-580-016 $14.94SFR 203-580-017 $14.94SFR 203-580-018 $14.94SFR 203-580-020 $14.94SFR 203-580-021 $14.94SFR 203-580-022 $14.94SFR 203-580-023 $14.94SFR 203-580-024 $14.94SFR 203-580-035 $14.94SFR 203-580-036 $14.94SFR 203-580-037 $14.94SFR 203-580-038 $14.94SFR 203-580-039 $14.94SFR 203-580-040 $74.70COM 203-580-042 $14.94SFR 203-580-044 $14.94SFR 203-580-046 $14.94SFR 203-580-047 $14.94SFR 203-580-049 $14.94SFR 203-580-050 $14.94SFR 203-580-053 $14.94SFR 203-580-054 $14.94SFR 203-580-055 $14.94SFR 203-580-056 $14.94SFR 203-580-057 $14.94SFR 203-580-060 $14.94SFR 203-580-061 $14.94SFR 203-580-062 $14.94SFR 203-580-063 $14.94SFR 203-580-064 $14.94SFR 203-580-065 $14.94SFR 203-580-066 $14.94SFR 203-580-067 $14.94SFR 203-601-001 $14.94SFR 203-601-002 $14.94SFR 203-601-003 $14.94SFR 203-601-004 $14.94SFR 203-601-005 $14.94SFR 203-601-006 $14.94SFR 203-601-007 $14.94SFR 203-601-008 $14.94SFR 203-601-009 $14.94SFR 203-601-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-602-001 $14.94SFR 203-602-002 $14.94SFR 203-602-003 $14.94SFR 203-602-004 $14.94SFR 203-602-005 $14.94SFR 203-602-006 $14.94SFR 203-602-007 $14.94SFR 203-602-008 $14.94SFR 203-602-009 $14.94SFR 203-602-010 $14.94SFR 203-602-011 $14.94SFR 203-602-012 $14.94SFR 203-602-013 $14.94SFR 203-602-014 $14.94SFR 203-603-001 $14.94SFR 203-603-002 $14.94SFR 203-603-003 $14.94SFR 203-603-004 $14.94SFR 203-603-005 $14.94SFR 203-603-006 $14.94SFR 203-610-002 $14.94SFR 203-610-003 $14.94SFR 203-610-004 $14.94SFR 203-610-005 $14.94SFR 203-610-007 $14.94SFR 203-610-008 $14.94SFR 203-610-009 $14.94SFR 203-610-010 $14.94SFR 203-610-011 $14.94SFR 203-610-012 $14.94SFR 203-610-013 $14.94SFR 203-610-014 $14.94SFR 203-610-015 $14.94SFR 203-610-016 $14.94SFR 203-610-017 $14.94SFR 203-610-018 $14.94SFR 203-610-019 $14.94SFR 203-610-021 $14.94SFR 203-610-022 $14.94SFR 203-610-023 $14.94SFR 203-610-024 $14.94SFR 203-610-025 $14.94SFR 203-610-026 $14.94SFR 203-610-027 $14.94SFR 203-610-028 $14.94SFR 203-610-029 $14.94SFR 203-610-030 $14.94SFR 203-610-031 $14.94SFR 203-610-033 $14.94SFR 203-610-034 $14.94SFR 203-610-035 $14.94SFR 203-610-036 $14.94SFR - 118 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-610-037 $14.94SFR 203-610-038 $14.94SFR 203-610-039 $14.94SFR 203-610-040 $14.94SFR 203-610-041 $14.94SFR 203-610-042 $14.94SFR 203-610-043 $14.94SFR 203-610-044 $14.94SFR 203-610-046 $14.94SFR 203-610-047 $14.94SFR 203-621-001 $14.94SFR 203-621-002 $14.94SFR 203-621-003 $14.94SFR 203-621-004 $14.94SFR 203-621-010 $7.46VSFR 203-621-011 $14.94SFR 203-621-012 $14.94SFR 203-621-013 $14.94SFR 203-621-016 $14.94SFR 203-621-017 $14.94SFR 203-621-018 $14.94SFR 203-621-019 $14.94SFR 203-621-026 $14.94SFR 203-621-028 $14.94SFR 203-621-029 $14.94SFR 203-621-030 $14.94SFR 203-621-031 $14.94SFR 203-621-032 $14.94SFR 203-622-001 $14.94SFR 203-622-002 $14.94SFR 203-622-003 $14.94SFR 203-622-006 $14.94SFR 203-622-007 $14.94SFR 203-622-010 $14.94SFR 203-631-002 $14.94SFR 203-631-003 $14.94SFR 203-631-004 $14.94SFR 203-631-005 $14.94SFR 203-631-006 $14.94SFR 203-631-007 $14.94SFR 203-631-008 $14.94SFR 203-631-011 $14.94SFR 203-631-012 $14.94SFR 203-631-014 $14.94SFR 203-631-015 $14.94SFR 203-631-016 $14.94SFR 203-632-001 $14.94SFR 203-632-002 $14.94SFR 203-632-003 $14.94SFR 203-632-004 $14.94SFR 203-632-005 $14.94SFR 203-632-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-632-007 $14.94SFR 203-632-008 $14.94SFR 203-632-009 $14.94SFR 203-632-011 $14.94SFR 203-632-012 $14.94SFR 203-632-017 $14.94SFR 203-632-019 $14.94SFR 203-632-020 $14.94SFR 203-640-001 $14.94SFR 203-640-002 $14.94SFR 203-660-004 $14.94SFR 203-660-005 $14.94SFR 203-660-006 $14.94SFR 203-660-007 $14.94SFR 203-660-008 $14.94SFR 203-660-009 $14.94SFR 203-660-011 $14.94SFR 203-660-012 $14.94SFR 203-660-013 $14.94SFR 203-660-016 $14.94SFR 203-660-017 $14.94SFR 203-660-018 $14.94SFR 203-660-023 $14.94SFR 203-671-001 $14.94SFR 203-671-002 $14.94SFR 203-671-003 $14.94SFR 203-671-004 $14.94SFR 203-671-033 $14.94SFR 203-671-034 $14.94SFR 203-671-035 $14.94SFR 203-671-036 $14.94SFR 203-671-037 $14.94SFR 203-671-038 $14.94SFR 203-671-039 $14.94SFR 203-671-040 $14.94SFR 203-671-041 $14.94SFR 203-671-042 $14.94SFR 203-671-043 $14.94SFR 203-671-044 $14.94SFR 203-671-045 $14.94SFR 203-671-046 $14.94SFR 203-671-047 $14.94SFR 203-671-048 $14.94SFR 203-671-049 $14.94SFR 203-671-050 $14.94SFR 203-672-001 $14.94SFR 203-672-002 $14.94SFR 203-672-003 $14.94SFR 203-672-004 $14.94SFR 203-672-005 $14.94SFR 203-672-006 $14.94SFR 203-672-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-672-010 $14.94SFR 203-672-012 $14.94SFR 203-672-013 $14.94SFR 203-672-014 $14.94SFR 203-672-015 $14.94SFR 203-672-016 $14.94SFR 203-672-017 $14.94SFR 203-672-018 $14.94SFR 203-672-019 $14.94SFR 203-672-020 $14.94SFR 203-672-021 $14.94SFR 203-672-022 $14.94SFR 203-672-023 $14.94SFR 203-672-024 $14.94SFR 203-672-025 $14.94SFR 203-672-026 $14.94SFR 203-672-027 $14.94SFR 203-672-028 $14.94SFR 203-672-029 $14.94SFR 203-672-030 $14.94SFR 203-672-032 $14.94SFR 203-672-035 $14.94SFR 203-672-037 $14.94SFR 203-672-038 $14.94SFR 203-672-040 $14.94SFR 203-672-041 $14.94SFR 203-672-042 $14.94SFR 203-672-043 $14.94SFR 203-672-047 $14.94SFR 203-672-048 $14.94SFR 203-672-049 $14.94SFR 203-672-050 $14.94SFR 203-672-053 $14.94SFR 203-672-054 $14.94SFR 203-672-056 $14.94SFR 203-672-059 $14.94SFR 203-680-001 $14.94SFR 203-680-002 $14.94SFR 203-680-003 $14.94SFR 203-680-004 $14.94SFR 203-680-005 $14.94SFR 203-680-006 $14.94SFR 203-680-007 $14.94SFR 203-680-008 $14.94SFR 203-680-009 $14.94SFR 203-680-010 $14.94SFR 203-680-011 $14.94SFR 203-680-012 $14.94SFR 203-680-013 $14.94SFR 203-680-014 $14.94SFR 203-680-015 $14.94SFR 203-680-016 $14.94SFR - 119 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-680-018 $14.94SFR 203-680-019 $14.94SFR 203-680-021 $14.94SFR 203-680-022 $14.94SFR 203-680-023 $14.94SFR 203-680-024 $14.94SFR 203-680-026 $14.94SFR 203-680-027 $14.94SFR 203-680-028 $14.94SFR 203-680-029 $14.94SFR 203-680-030 $14.94SFR 203-680-031 $14.94SFR 203-680-032 $14.94SFR 203-680-033 $14.94SFR 203-680-034 $14.94SFR 203-680-035 $14.94SFR 203-680-036 $14.94SFR 203-680-037 $14.94SFR 203-680-038 $14.94SFR 203-680-039 $14.94SFR 203-680-040 $14.94SFR 203-680-042 $74.70COM 203-680-044 $14.94SFR 203-680-045 $14.94SFR 203-680-046 $14.94SFR 203-691-002 $14.94SFR 203-691-004 $14.94SFR 203-691-005 $14.94SFR 203-691-007 $14.94SFR 203-691-013 $14.94SFR 203-691-014 $14.94SFR 203-691-015 $14.94SFR 203-691-016 $14.94SFR 203-691-017 $14.94SFR 203-691-018 $14.94SFR 203-691-019 $14.94SFR 203-691-020 $14.94SFR 203-691-021 $14.94SFR 203-691-022 $14.94SFR 203-691-023 $14.94SFR 203-691-024 $14.94SFR 203-691-025 $14.94SFR 203-691-026 $14.94SFR 203-691-027 $14.94SFR 203-691-029 $14.94SFR 203-691-030 $14.94SFR 203-691-031 $14.94SFR 203-691-032 $14.94SFR 203-691-033 $14.94SFR 203-691-034 $14.94SFR 203-691-035 $14.94SFR 203-692-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-692-002 $14.94SFR 203-692-003 $14.94SFR 203-692-004 $14.94SFR 203-692-005 $14.94SFR 203-692-006 $14.94SFR 203-700-009 $74.70COM 203-700-010 $74.70COM 203-710-001 $14.94SFR 203-710-002 $14.94SFR 203-710-003 $14.94SFR 203-710-014 $14.94SFR 203-710-021 $14.94SFR 203-710-022 $14.94SFR 203-710-023 $14.94SFR 203-710-025 $14.94SFR 203-721-001 $14.94SFR 203-721-002 $14.94SFR 203-721-003 $14.94SFR 203-721-004 $14.94SFR 203-721-007 $14.94SFR 203-721-008 $14.94SFR 203-721-009 $14.94SFR 203-721-010 $14.94SFR 203-721-011 $14.94SFR 203-721-012 $14.94SFR 203-721-013 $14.94SFR 203-721-014 $14.94SFR 203-721-015 $14.94SFR 203-721-016 $14.94SFR 203-721-018 $14.94SFR 203-721-019 $14.94SFR 203-722-001 $14.94SFR 203-722-002 $14.94SFR 203-722-003 $14.94SFR 203-722-004 $14.94SFR 203-722-005 $14.94SFR 203-722-006 $14.94SFR 203-722-007 $14.94SFR 203-722-009 $14.94SFR 203-722-010 $14.94SFR 203-722-011 $14.94SFR 203-722-012 $14.94SFR 203-722-013 $14.94SFR 203-722-014 $14.94SFR 203-731-001 $14.94SFR 203-731-002 $14.94SFR 203-731-003 $14.94SFR 203-731-004 $14.94SFR 203-731-005 $14.94SFR 203-731-013 $14.94SFR 203-731-014 $14.94SFR 203-731-015 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-731-018 $74.70COM 203-731-020 $14.94SFR 203-731-021 $14.94SFR 203-731-022 $14.94SFR 203-731-023 $14.94SFR 203-731-025 $14.94SFR 203-731-026 $14.94SFR 203-731-028 $14.94SFR 203-731-029 $14.94SFR 203-731-030 $14.94SFR 203-731-031 $14.94SFR 203-731-034 $14.94SFR 203-732-015 $14.94SFR 203-732-016 $14.94SFR 203-732-017 $14.94SFR 203-732-018 $14.94SFR 203-732-019 $14.94SFR 203-732-020 $14.94SFR 203-732-021 $14.94SFR 203-732-022 $14.94SFR 203-732-023 $14.94SFR 203-732-024 $14.94SFR 203-732-025 $14.94SFR 203-732-026 $14.94SFR 203-732-027 $14.94SFR 203-732-028 $14.94SFR 203-732-029 $14.94SFR 203-750-001 $7.46CONDO 203-750-002 $7.46CONDO 203-750-003 $7.46CONDO 203-750-004 $7.46CONDO 203-750-005 $7.46CONDO 203-750-006 $7.46CONDO 203-750-007 $7.46CONDO 203-750-008 $7.46CONDO 203-750-009 $7.46CONDO 203-750-010 $7.46CONDO 203-750-011 $7.46CONDO 203-750-012 $7.46CONDO 203-750-013 $7.46CONDO 203-750-014 $7.46CONDO 203-750-015 $7.46CONDO 203-750-016 $7.46CONDO 203-750-017 $7.46CONDO 203-750-018 $7.46CONDO 203-750-019 $7.46CONDO 203-750-020 $7.46CONDO 203-750-021 $7.46CONDO 203-750-022 $7.46CONDO 203-750-023 $7.46CONDO 203-750-024 $7.46CONDO 203-750-025 $7.46CONDO - 120 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-750-026 $7.46CONDO 203-750-027 $7.46CONDO 203-750-028 $7.46CONDO 203-750-029 $7.46CONDO 203-750-030 $7.46CONDO 203-750-031 $7.46CONDO 203-750-032 $7.46CONDO 203-750-033 $7.46CONDO 203-750-034 $7.46CONDO 203-750-035 $7.46CONDO 203-750-036 $7.46CONDO 203-750-037 $7.46CONDO 203-750-038 $7.46CONDO 203-750-039 $7.46CONDO 203-750-040 $7.46CONDO 203-750-041 $7.46CONDO 203-750-042 $7.46CONDO 203-750-043 $7.46CONDO 203-750-044 $7.46CONDO 203-750-045 $7.46CONDO 203-750-046 $7.46CONDO 203-750-047 $7.46CONDO 203-750-048 $7.46CONDO 203-750-049 $7.46CONDO 203-750-050 $7.46CONDO 203-750-051 $7.46CONDO 203-750-052 $7.46CONDO 203-750-053 $7.46CONDO 203-750-054 $7.46CONDO 203-750-055 $7.46CONDO 203-750-056 $7.46CONDO 203-750-057 $7.46CONDO 203-750-058 $7.46CONDO 203-750-059 $7.46CONDO 203-750-060 $7.46CONDO 203-750-061 $7.46CONDO 203-750-062 $7.46CONDO 203-750-063 $7.46CONDO 203-750-064 $7.46CONDO 203-750-065 $7.46CONDO 203-750-066 $7.46CONDO 203-750-067 $7.46CONDO 203-750-068 $7.46CONDO 203-760-001 $14.94SFR 203-760-002 $14.94SFR 203-760-003 $14.94SFR 203-760-004 $14.94SFR 203-760-005 $14.94SFR 203-760-006 $14.94SFR 203-760-007 $14.94SFR 203-760-008 $14.94SFR 203-760-009 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-760-010 $14.94SFR 203-760-011 $14.94SFR 203-760-012 $14.94SFR 203-760-013 $14.94SFR 203-760-014 $14.94SFR 203-760-015 $14.94SFR 203-760-016 $14.94SFR 203-760-018 $14.94SFR 203-760-019 $14.94SFR 203-760-020 $14.94SFR 203-760-021 $14.94SFR 203-760-031 $14.94SFR 203-770-005 $74.70COM 203-770-007 $74.70IND 203-780-005 $74.70COM 203-780-011 $74.70COM 203-780-012 $74.70COM 203-780-013 $74.70COM 203-780-014 $74.70COM 203-780-015 $74.70COM 203-780-016 $74.70COM 203-780-017 $74.70COM 203-780-018 $74.70COM 203-780-020 $74.70COM 203-780-055 $74.70COM 203-780-057 $74.70COM 203-780-060 $74.70COM 203-780-061 $74.70COM 203-780-062 $74.70COM 203-780-066 $74.70COM 203-780-067 $74.70COM 203-780-071 $74.70COM 203-780-072 $74.70COM 203-780-079 $74.70COM 203-790-001 $7.46CONDO 203-790-002 $7.46CONDO 203-790-003 $7.46CONDO 203-790-004 $7.46CONDO 203-820-004 $14.94SFR 203-820-005 $14.94SFR 203-820-006 $14.94SFR 203-820-007 $14.94SFR 203-820-014 $14.94SFR 203-820-015 $14.94SFR 203-820-016 $14.94SFR 203-830-001 $14.94SFR 203-830-002 $14.94SFR 203-830-003 $14.94SFR 203-830-004 $14.94SFR 203-830-005 $14.94SFR 203-830-006 $14.94SFR 203-830-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 203-830-008 $14.94SFR 203-830-009 $14.94SFR 203-830-010 $14.94SFR 203-830-011 $14.94SFR 203-830-012 $14.94SFR 203-830-013 $14.94SFR 203-830-014 $14.94SFR 203-830-015 $14.94SFR 203-830-016 $14.94SFR 203-830-017 $14.94SFR 203-840-001 $14.94SFR 203-840-002 $14.94SFR 203-840-003 $14.94SFR 203-840-004 $14.94SFR 203-840-005 $14.94SFR 203-840-006 $14.94SFR 203-840-007 $14.94SFR 203-840-008 $14.94SFR 203-840-009 $14.94SFR 203-840-012 $14.94SFR 203-840-013 $14.94SFR 203-840-015 $14.94SFR 203-840-016 $14.94SFR 204-050-029 $7.46MISC 206-030-073 $7.46MISC 206-030-085 $7.46MISC 206-030-088 $7.46MISC 206-530-001 $14.94SFR 206-530-002 $14.94SFR 206-530-003 $14.94SFR 206-530-004 $14.94SFR 206-530-005 $14.94SFR 206-530-006 $14.94SFR 206-530-007 $14.94SFR 206-530-008 $14.94SFR 206-530-009 $14.94SFR 206-530-010 $14.94SFR 206-530-011 $14.94SFR 206-530-012 $14.94SFR 206-530-013 $14.94SFR 206-530-014 $14.94SFR 206-530-015 $14.94SFR 206-530-016 $14.94SFR 206-530-017 $14.94SFR 206-530-018 $14.94SFR 206-530-019 $14.94SFR 206-530-020 $14.94SFR 206-530-021 $14.94SFR 206-530-022 $14.94SFR 206-530-023 $14.94SFR 206-530-024 $14.94SFR 206-530-025 $14.94SFR - 121 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-530-026 $14.94SFR 206-530-027 $14.94SFR 206-530-028 $14.94SFR 206-530-029 $14.94SFR 206-530-030 $14.94SFR 206-530-031 $14.94SFR 206-530-032 $14.94SFR 206-530-033 $14.94SFR 206-530-034 $14.94SFR 206-530-035 $14.94SFR 206-530-036 $14.94SFR 206-530-037 $14.94SFR 206-530-038 $14.94SFR 206-530-039 $14.94SFR 206-530-040 $14.94SFR 206-530-041 $14.94SFR 206-530-042 $14.94SFR 206-530-043 $14.94SFR 206-530-044 $14.94SFR 206-530-045 $14.94SFR 206-530-046 $14.94SFR 206-530-047 $14.94SFR 206-530-048 $14.94SFR 206-530-049 $14.94SFR 206-530-050 $14.94SFR 206-530-051 $14.94SFR 206-530-052 $14.94SFR 206-530-053 $14.94SFR 206-530-054 $14.94SFR 206-530-055 $14.94SFR 206-530-056 $14.94SFR 206-530-057 $14.94SFR 206-530-058 $14.94SFR 206-530-059 $14.94SFR 206-530-060 $14.94SFR 206-530-061 $14.94SFR 206-530-062 $14.94SFR 206-530-063 $14.94SFR 206-530-064 $14.94SFR 206-530-065 $14.94SFR 206-530-066 $14.94SFR 206-530-067 $14.94SFR 206-530-068 $14.94SFR 206-530-069 $14.94SFR 206-530-070 $14.94SFR 206-530-071 $14.94SFR 206-530-072 $14.94SFR 206-530-073 $14.94SFR 206-530-074 $14.94SFR 206-530-075 $14.94SFR 206-530-076 $14.94SFR 206-530-077 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-530-078 $14.94SFR 206-530-079 $14.94SFR 206-550-001 $14.94SFR 206-550-002 $14.94SFR 206-550-003 $14.94SFR 206-550-004 $14.94SFR 206-550-005 $14.94SFR 206-550-006 $14.94SFR 206-550-007 $14.94SFR 206-550-008 $14.94SFR 206-550-009 $14.94SFR 206-550-010 $14.94SFR 206-550-011 $14.94SFR 206-550-012 $14.94SFR 206-550-013 $14.94SFR 206-550-014 $14.94SFR 206-550-015 $14.94SFR 206-550-016 $14.94SFR 206-550-017 $14.94SFR 206-550-018 $14.94SFR 206-550-019 $14.94SFR 206-550-020 $14.94SFR 206-550-021 $14.94SFR 206-550-022 $14.94SFR 206-550-023 $14.94SFR 206-550-024 $14.94SFR 206-550-025 $14.94SFR 206-550-026 $14.94SFR 206-550-027 $14.94SFR 206-550-028 $14.94SFR 206-550-029 $14.94SFR 206-550-030 $14.94SFR 206-550-031 $14.94SFR 206-550-032 $14.94SFR 206-550-033 $14.94SFR 206-550-034 $14.94SFR 206-550-035 $14.94SFR 206-550-036 $14.94SFR 206-550-037 $14.94SFR 206-580-001 $14.94SFR 206-580-002 $14.94SFR 206-580-003 $14.94SFR 206-580-004 $14.94SFR 206-580-005 $14.94SFR 206-580-006 $14.94SFR 206-580-007 $14.94SFR 206-580-008 $14.94SFR 206-580-009 $14.94SFR 206-580-010 $14.94SFR 206-580-011 $14.94SFR 206-580-012 $14.94SFR 206-580-013 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-580-014 $14.94SFR 206-580-015 $14.94SFR 206-580-016 $14.94SFR 206-580-017 $14.94SFR 206-580-018 $14.94SFR 206-580-019 $14.94SFR 206-580-020 $14.94SFR 206-580-021 $14.94SFR 206-580-022 $14.94SFR 206-580-023 $14.94SFR 206-580-024 $14.94SFR 206-580-025 $14.94SFR 206-580-026 $14.94SFR 206-580-027 $14.94SFR 206-580-028 $14.94SFR 206-580-029 $14.94SFR 206-580-030 $14.94SFR 206-580-031 $14.94SFR 206-580-032 $14.94SFR 206-580-033 $14.94SFR 206-580-034 $14.94SFR 206-580-035 $14.94SFR 206-580-037 $119.52MFR8 206-590-001 $14.94SFR 206-590-002 $14.94SFR 206-590-003 $14.94SFR 206-590-004 $14.94SFR 206-590-005 $14.94SFR 206-590-006 $14.94SFR 206-590-007 $14.94SFR 206-590-008 $14.94SFR 206-590-009 $14.94SFR 206-590-010 $14.94SFR 206-590-011 $14.94SFR 206-590-012 $14.94SFR 206-590-013 $14.94SFR 206-590-014 $14.94SFR 206-590-015 $14.94SFR 206-590-016 $14.94SFR 206-590-017 $14.94SFR 206-590-018 $14.94SFR 206-590-019 $14.94SFR 206-590-020 $14.94SFR 206-590-021 $14.94SFR 206-590-022 $14.94SFR 206-590-023 $14.94SFR 206-590-024 $14.94SFR 206-590-025 $14.94SFR 206-590-026 $14.94SFR 206-590-027 $14.94SFR 206-590-028 $14.94SFR 206-590-029 $14.94SFR - 122 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-590-030 $14.94SFR 206-590-031 $14.94SFR 206-590-032 $14.94SFR 206-590-033 $14.94SFR 206-590-034 $14.94SFR 206-590-035 $14.94SFR 206-590-036 $14.94SFR 206-590-037 $14.94SFR 206-590-038 $14.94SFR 206-590-039 $14.94SFR 206-590-040 $14.94SFR 206-590-041 $14.94SFR 206-590-042 $14.94SFR 206-590-043 $14.94SFR 206-590-044 $14.94SFR 206-590-045 $14.94SFR 206-590-046 $14.94SFR 206-590-047 $14.94SFR 206-590-048 $14.94SFR 206-590-049 $14.94SFR 206-590-050 $14.94SFR 206-590-051 $14.94SFR 206-590-052 $14.94SFR 206-590-053 $14.94SFR 206-590-054 $14.94SFR 206-590-055 $14.94SFR 206-590-056 $14.94SFR 206-590-057 $14.94SFR 206-590-058 $14.94SFR 206-590-059 $14.94SFR 206-590-060 $14.94SFR 206-590-061 $14.94SFR 206-590-062 $14.94SFR 206-590-063 $14.94SFR 206-590-064 $14.94SFR 206-590-065 $14.94SFR 206-590-066 $14.94SFR 206-590-067 $14.94SFR 206-590-068 $14.94SFR 206-590-069 $14.94SFR 206-590-070 $14.94SFR 206-590-071 $14.94SFR 206-590-072 $14.94SFR 206-590-073 $14.94SFR 206-590-074 $14.94SFR 206-590-075 $14.94SFR 206-590-076 $14.94SFR 206-590-077 $14.94SFR 206-590-078 $14.94SFR 206-590-079 $14.94SFR 206-590-080 $14.94SFR 206-590-081 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-590-082 $14.94SFR 206-590-083 $14.94SFR 206-590-084 $14.94SFR 206-590-085 $14.94SFR 206-590-086 $14.94SFR 206-590-087 $14.94SFR 206-590-088 $14.94SFR 206-590-089 $14.94SFR 206-590-090 $14.94SFR 206-600-001 $14.94SFR 206-600-002 $14.94SFR 206-600-003 $14.94SFR 206-600-004 $14.94SFR 206-600-005 $14.94SFR 206-600-006 $14.94SFR 206-600-007 $14.94SFR 206-600-008 $14.94SFR 206-600-009 $14.94SFR 206-600-010 $14.94SFR 206-600-011 $14.94SFR 206-600-012 $14.94SFR 206-600-013 $14.94SFR 206-600-014 $14.94SFR 206-600-015 $14.94SFR 206-600-016 $14.94SFR 206-600-017 $14.94SFR 206-600-018 $14.94SFR 206-600-019 $14.94SFR 206-600-020 $14.94SFR 206-600-021 $14.94SFR 206-600-022 $14.94SFR 206-600-023 $14.94SFR 206-600-024 $14.94SFR 206-600-025 $14.94SFR 206-600-026 $14.94SFR 206-600-027 $14.94SFR 206-600-028 $14.94SFR 206-600-029 $14.94SFR 206-600-030 $14.94SFR 206-600-031 $14.94SFR 206-600-032 $14.94SFR 206-600-033 $14.94SFR 206-600-034 $14.94SFR 206-600-035 $14.94SFR 206-600-036 $14.94SFR 206-600-037 $14.94SFR 206-600-038 $14.94SFR 206-600-039 $14.94SFR 206-600-040 $14.94SFR 206-600-041 $14.94SFR 206-600-042 $14.94SFR 206-600-043 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-600-044 $14.94SFR 206-600-045 $14.94SFR 206-600-046 $14.94SFR 206-600-047 $14.94SFR 206-600-048 $14.94SFR 206-600-049 $14.94SFR 206-600-050 $14.94SFR 206-600-051 $14.94SFR 206-600-052 $14.94SFR 206-600-053 $14.94SFR 206-600-054 $14.94SFR 206-600-055 $14.94SFR 206-600-056 $14.94SFR 206-600-057 $14.94SFR 206-600-058 $14.94SFR 206-600-059 $14.94SFR 206-600-060 $14.94SFR 206-600-061 $14.94SFR 206-600-062 $14.94SFR 206-600-063 $14.94SFR 206-600-064 $14.94SFR 206-600-065 $14.94SFR 206-600-066 $14.94SFR 206-600-067 $14.94SFR 206-600-068 $14.94SFR 206-600-069 $14.94SFR 206-600-070 $14.94SFR 206-600-071 $14.94SFR 206-610-001 $14.94SFR 206-610-002 $14.94SFR 206-610-003 $14.94SFR 206-610-004 $14.94SFR 206-610-005 $14.94SFR 206-610-006 $14.94SFR 206-610-007 $14.94SFR 206-610-008 $14.94SFR 206-610-009 $14.94SFR 206-610-010 $14.94SFR 206-610-011 $14.94SFR 206-610-012 $14.94SFR 206-610-013 $14.94SFR 206-610-014 $14.94SFR 206-610-015 $14.94SFR 206-610-016 $14.94SFR 206-610-017 $14.94SFR 206-610-018 $14.94SFR 206-610-019 $14.94SFR 206-610-020 $14.94SFR 206-610-021 $14.94SFR 206-610-022 $14.94SFR 206-610-023 $14.94SFR 206-610-024 $14.94SFR - 123 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-610-025 $14.94SFR 206-610-026 $14.94SFR 206-610-027 $14.94SFR 206-610-028 $14.94SFR 206-610-029 $14.94SFR 206-610-030 $14.94SFR 206-610-031 $14.94SFR 206-610-032 $14.94SFR 206-610-033 $14.94SFR 206-610-034 $14.94SFR 206-610-035 $14.94SFR 206-610-036 $14.94SFR 206-610-037 $14.94SFR 206-610-038 $14.94SFR 206-610-039 $14.94SFR 206-620-001 $14.94SFR 206-620-002 $14.94SFR 206-620-003 $14.94SFR 206-620-004 $14.94SFR 206-620-005 $14.94SFR 206-620-006 $14.94SFR 206-620-007 $14.94SFR 206-620-008 $14.94SFR 206-620-009 $14.94SFR 206-620-010 $14.94SFR 206-620-011 $14.94SFR 206-620-012 $14.94SFR 206-620-013 $14.94SFR 206-620-014 $14.94SFR 206-620-015 $14.94SFR 206-620-016 $14.94SFR 206-620-017 $14.94SFR 206-620-018 $14.94SFR 206-620-019 $14.94SFR 206-620-020 $14.94SFR 206-620-022 $14.94SFR 206-620-023 $14.94SFR 206-620-024 $14.94SFR 206-620-025 $14.94SFR 206-620-026 $14.94SFR 206-620-027 $14.94SFR 206-620-028 $14.94SFR 206-620-029 $14.94SFR 206-620-030 $14.94SFR 206-620-031 $14.94SFR 206-620-032 $14.94SFR 206-620-033 $14.94SFR 206-620-034 $14.94SFR 206-620-035 $14.94SFR 206-620-036 $14.94SFR 206-620-037 $14.94SFR 206-620-038 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-620-039 $14.94SFR 206-620-040 $14.94SFR 206-620-041 $14.94SFR 206-620-042 $14.94SFR 206-620-043 $14.94SFR 206-620-044 $14.94SFR 206-620-045 $14.94SFR 206-620-046 $14.94SFR 206-620-047 $14.94SFR 206-620-048 $14.94SFR 206-620-049 $14.94SFR 206-620-050 $14.94SFR 206-620-051 $14.94SFR 206-620-052 $14.94SFR 206-620-053 $14.94SFR 206-620-054 $14.94SFR 206-620-055 $14.94SFR 206-620-056 $14.94SFR 206-620-058 $14.94SFR 206-630-001 $14.94SFR 206-630-002 $14.94SFR 206-630-003 $14.94SFR 206-630-004 $14.94SFR 206-630-005 $14.94SFR 206-630-006 $14.94SFR 206-630-007 $14.94SFR 206-630-008 $14.94SFR 206-630-009 $14.94SFR 206-630-010 $14.94SFR 206-630-011 $14.94SFR 206-630-012 $14.94SFR 206-630-013 $14.94SFR 206-630-014 $14.94SFR 206-630-015 $14.94SFR 206-630-016 $14.94SFR 206-630-017 $14.94SFR 206-630-018 $14.94SFR 206-630-019 $14.94SFR 206-630-020 $14.94SFR 206-630-021 $14.94SFR 206-630-022 $14.94SFR 206-630-023 $14.94SFR 206-630-024 $14.94SFR 206-630-025 $14.94SFR 206-630-026 $14.94SFR 206-630-027 $14.94SFR 206-630-028 $14.94SFR 206-630-029 $14.94SFR 206-630-030 $14.94SFR 206-630-031 $14.94SFR 206-630-032 $14.94SFR 206-630-033 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-630-034 $14.94SFR 206-630-035 $14.94SFR 206-630-036 $14.94SFR 206-630-037 $14.94SFR 206-630-038 $14.94SFR 206-630-039 $14.94SFR 206-630-040 $14.94SFR 206-630-041 $14.94SFR 206-630-042 $14.94SFR 206-630-043 $14.94SFR 206-630-044 $14.94SFR 206-630-045 $14.94SFR 206-630-046 $14.94SFR 206-630-047 $14.94SFR 206-630-048 $14.94SFR 206-630-049 $14.94SFR 206-630-050 $14.94SFR 206-630-051 $14.94SFR 206-630-052 $14.94SFR 206-640-001 $14.94SFR 206-640-002 $14.94SFR 206-640-003 $14.94SFR 206-640-004 $14.94SFR 206-640-005 $14.94SFR 206-640-006 $14.94SFR 206-640-007 $14.94SFR 206-640-008 $14.94SFR 206-640-009 $14.94SFR 206-640-010 $14.94SFR 206-640-011 $14.94SFR 206-640-012 $14.94SFR 206-640-013 $14.94SFR 206-640-014 $14.94SFR 206-640-015 $14.94SFR 206-640-016 $14.94SFR 206-640-017 $14.94SFR 206-640-018 $14.94SFR 206-640-019 $14.94SFR 206-640-020 $14.94SFR 206-640-021 $14.94SFR 206-640-022 $14.94SFR 206-640-023 $14.94SFR 206-640-024 $14.94SFR 206-640-025 $14.94SFR 206-640-026 $14.94SFR 206-640-027 $14.94SFR 206-640-028 $14.94SFR 206-640-029 $14.94SFR 206-640-030 $14.94SFR 206-640-031 $14.94SFR 206-640-032 $14.94SFR 206-640-033 $14.94SFR - 124 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-640-034 $14.94SFR 206-640-035 $14.94SFR 206-650-001 $14.94SFR 206-650-002 $14.94SFR 206-650-003 $14.94SFR 206-650-004 $14.94SFR 206-650-005 $14.94SFR 206-650-006 $14.94SFR 206-650-007 $14.94SFR 206-650-008 $14.94SFR 206-650-009 $14.94SFR 206-660-001 $14.94SFR 206-660-002 $14.94SFR 206-660-003 $14.94SFR 206-660-004 $14.94SFR 206-660-005 $14.94SFR 206-660-006 $14.94SFR 206-660-007 $14.94SFR 206-660-008 $14.94SFR 206-660-009 $14.94SFR 206-660-010 $14.94SFR 206-660-011 $14.94SFR 206-660-012 $14.94SFR 206-660-013 $14.94SFR 206-660-014 $14.94SFR 206-660-015 $14.94SFR 206-660-016 $14.94SFR 206-660-017 $14.94SFR 206-660-018 $14.94SFR 206-660-019 $14.94SFR 206-660-020 $14.94SFR 206-660-021 $14.94SFR 206-660-022 $14.94SFR 206-660-023 $14.94SFR 206-660-024 $14.94SFR 206-660-025 $14.94SFR 206-660-026 $14.94SFR 206-660-027 $14.94SFR 206-660-028 $14.94SFR 206-660-029 $14.94SFR 206-660-030 $14.94SFR 206-660-031 $14.94SFR 206-660-032 $14.94SFR 206-660-033 $14.94SFR 206-660-034 $14.94SFR 206-660-035 $14.94SFR 206-660-036 $14.94SFR 206-660-037 $14.94SFR 206-660-038 $14.94SFR 206-660-039 $14.94SFR 206-660-040 $14.94SFR 206-660-041 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-660-042 $14.94SFR 206-660-043 $14.94SFR 206-660-044 $14.94SFR 206-660-045 $14.94SFR 206-660-046 $14.94SFR 206-660-047 $14.94SFR 206-660-048 $14.94SFR 206-660-049 $14.94SFR 206-660-050 $14.94SFR 206-670-001 $14.94SFR 206-670-002 $14.94SFR 206-670-003 $14.94SFR 206-670-004 $14.94SFR 206-670-005 $14.94SFR 206-670-006 $14.94SFR 206-670-007 $14.94SFR 206-670-008 $14.94SFR 206-670-009 $14.94SFR 206-670-010 $14.94SFR 206-670-011 $14.94SFR 206-670-012 $14.94SFR 206-670-013 $14.94SFR 206-670-014 $14.94SFR 206-670-015 $14.94SFR 206-670-016 $14.94SFR 206-670-017 $14.94SFR 206-670-018 $14.94SFR 206-670-019 $14.94SFR 206-670-020 $14.94SFR 206-670-021 $14.94SFR 206-670-022 $14.94SFR 206-670-023 $14.94SFR 206-670-024 $14.94SFR 206-670-025 $14.94SFR 206-670-026 $14.94SFR 206-670-027 $14.94SFR 206-670-028 $14.94SFR 206-670-029 $14.94SFR 206-670-030 $14.94SFR 206-670-031 $14.94SFR 206-670-032 $14.94SFR 206-670-033 $14.94SFR 206-670-034 $14.94SFR 206-670-035 $14.94SFR 206-670-036 $14.94SFR 206-670-037 $14.94SFR 206-670-038 $14.94SFR 206-670-039 $14.94SFR 206-670-040 $14.94SFR 206-670-041 $14.94SFR 206-670-042 $14.94SFR 206-670-043 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-670-044 $14.94SFR 206-670-045 $14.94SFR 206-670-046 $14.94SFR 206-670-047 $14.94SFR 206-670-048 $14.94SFR 206-670-049 $14.94SFR 206-670-050 $14.94SFR 206-680-001 $14.94SFR 206-680-002 $14.94SFR 206-680-003 $14.94SFR 206-680-004 $14.94SFR 206-680-005 $14.94SFR 206-680-006 $14.94SFR 206-680-007 $14.94SFR 206-680-008 $14.94SFR 206-680-009 $14.94SFR 206-680-010 $14.94SFR 206-680-011 $14.94SFR 206-680-012 $14.94SFR 206-680-013 $14.94SFR 206-680-014 $14.94SFR 206-680-015 $14.94SFR 206-680-016 $14.94SFR 206-680-017 $14.94SFR 206-680-018 $14.94SFR 206-680-019 $14.94SFR 206-680-020 $14.94SFR 206-700-001 $7.46CONDO 206-700-002 $7.46CONDO 206-700-003 $7.46CONDO 206-700-004 $7.46CONDO 206-700-005 $7.46CONDO 206-700-006 $7.46CONDO 206-700-007 $7.46CONDO 206-700-008 $7.46CONDO 206-700-009 $7.46CONDO 206-700-010 $7.46CONDO 206-700-011 $7.46CONDO 206-700-012 $7.46CONDO 206-700-013 $7.46CONDO 206-700-014 $7.46CONDO 206-700-015 $7.46CONDO 206-700-016 $7.46CONDO 206-700-017 $7.46CONDO 206-700-018 $7.46CONDO 206-700-019 $7.46CONDO 206-700-020 $7.46CONDO 206-700-021 $7.46CONDO 206-700-022 $7.46CONDO 206-700-023 $7.46CONDO 206-700-024 $7.46CONDO 206-700-025 $7.46CONDO - 125 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-700-026 $7.46CONDO 206-700-027 $7.46CONDO 206-700-028 $7.46CONDO 206-700-029 $7.46CONDO 206-700-030 $7.46CONDO 206-700-031 $7.46CONDO 206-700-032 $7.46CONDO 206-700-033 $7.46CONDO 206-700-034 $7.46CONDO 206-700-035 $7.46CONDO 206-700-036 $7.46CONDO 206-700-037 $7.46CONDO 206-700-038 $7.46CONDO 206-700-039 $7.46CONDO 206-700-040 $7.46CONDO 206-700-041 $7.46CONDO 206-700-042 $7.46CONDO 206-700-043 $7.46CONDO 206-700-044 $7.46CONDO 206-700-045 $7.46CONDO 206-700-046 $7.46CONDO 206-700-047 $7.46CONDO 206-700-048 $7.46CONDO 206-700-049 $7.46CONDO 206-700-050 $7.46CONDO 206-700-051 $7.46CONDO 206-700-052 $7.46CONDO 206-700-053 $7.46CONDO 206-700-054 $7.46CONDO 206-700-055 $7.46CONDO 206-700-056 $7.46CONDO 206-700-057 $7.46CONDO 206-700-058 $7.46CONDO 206-700-059 $7.46CONDO 206-700-060 $7.46CONDO 206-700-061 $7.46CONDO 206-700-062 $7.46CONDO 206-700-063 $7.46CONDO 206-700-064 $7.46CONDO 206-700-065 $7.46CONDO 206-700-066 $7.46CONDO 206-700-067 $7.46CONDO 206-700-068 $7.46CONDO 206-700-069 $7.46CONDO 206-700-070 $7.46CONDO 206-700-071 $7.46CONDO 206-700-072 $7.46CONDO 206-700-073 $7.46CONDO 206-700-074 $7.46CONDO 206-700-075 $7.46CONDO 206-700-076 $7.46CONDO 206-700-077 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-700-078 $7.46CONDO 206-700-079 $7.46CONDO 206-700-080 $7.46CONDO 206-700-081 $7.46CONDO 206-700-082 $7.46CONDO 206-700-083 $7.46CONDO 206-700-084 $7.46CONDO 206-700-085 $7.46CONDO 206-700-086 $7.46CONDO 206-700-087 $7.46CONDO 206-700-088 $7.46CONDO 206-700-089 $7.46CONDO 206-700-090 $7.46CONDO 206-700-091 $7.46CONDO 206-700-092 $7.46CONDO 206-700-093 $7.46CONDO 206-700-094 $7.46CONDO 206-700-095 $7.46CONDO 206-700-096 $7.46CONDO 206-700-097 $7.46CONDO 206-700-098 $7.46CONDO 206-700-099 $7.46CONDO 206-700-100 $7.46CONDO 206-700-101 $7.46CONDO 206-700-102 $7.46CONDO 206-700-103 $7.46CONDO 206-700-104 $7.46CONDO 206-700-105 $7.46CONDO 206-700-106 $7.46CONDO 206-700-107 $7.46CONDO 206-700-108 $7.46CONDO 206-700-109 $7.46CONDO 206-700-110 $7.46CONDO 206-700-111 $7.46CONDO 206-700-112 $7.46CONDO 206-700-113 $7.46CONDO 206-700-114 $7.46CONDO 206-700-115 $7.46CONDO 206-700-116 $7.46CONDO 206-700-117 $7.46CONDO 206-700-118 $7.46CONDO 206-700-119 $7.46CONDO 206-700-120 $7.46CONDO 206-700-121 $7.46CONDO 206-700-122 $7.46CONDO 206-700-123 $7.46CONDO 206-700-124 $7.46CONDO 206-700-125 $7.46CONDO 206-700-126 $7.46CONDO 206-700-127 $7.46CONDO 206-710-001 $14.94SFR 206-710-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-710-003 $14.94SFR 206-710-004 $14.94SFR 206-710-005 $14.94SFR 206-710-006 $14.94SFR 206-710-007 $14.94SFR 206-710-008 $14.94SFR 206-710-009 $14.94SFR 206-710-010 $14.94SFR 206-710-011 $14.94SFR 206-710-012 $14.94SFR 206-710-013 $14.94SFR 206-710-014 $14.94SFR 206-710-015 $14.94SFR 206-710-016 $14.94SFR 206-710-017 $14.94SFR 206-710-018 $14.94SFR 206-710-019 $14.94SFR 206-710-020 $14.94SFR 206-710-021 $14.94SFR 206-710-022 $14.94SFR 206-710-023 $14.94SFR 206-710-024 $14.94SFR 206-710-025 $14.94SFR 206-710-026 $14.94SFR 206-710-027 $14.94SFR 206-710-028 $14.94SFR 206-710-029 $14.94SFR 206-710-030 $14.94SFR 206-710-031 $14.94SFR 206-710-032 $14.94SFR 206-710-033 $14.94SFR 206-710-034 $14.94SFR 206-710-035 $14.94SFR 206-710-036 $14.94SFR 206-710-037 $14.94SFR 206-710-038 $14.94SFR 206-710-039 $14.94SFR 206-710-040 $14.94SFR 206-710-041 $14.94SFR 206-710-042 $14.94SFR 206-710-043 $14.94SFR 206-710-044 $14.94SFR 206-710-045 $14.94SFR 206-710-046 $14.94SFR 206-710-047 $14.94SFR 206-710-048 $14.94SFR 206-710-049 $14.94SFR 206-710-050 $14.94SFR 206-710-051 $14.94SFR 206-710-052 $14.94SFR 206-710-053 $14.94SFR 206-710-054 $14.94SFR - 126 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-710-055 $14.94SFR 206-710-056 $14.94SFR 206-710-057 $14.94SFR 206-710-058 $14.94SFR 206-710-059 $14.94SFR 206-710-060 $14.94SFR 206-720-001 $14.94SFR 206-720-002 $14.94SFR 206-720-003 $14.94SFR 206-720-004 $14.94SFR 206-720-005 $14.94SFR 206-720-006 $14.94SFR 206-720-007 $14.94SFR 206-720-008 $14.94SFR 206-720-009 $14.94SFR 206-720-010 $14.94SFR 206-720-011 $14.94SFR 206-720-012 $14.94SFR 206-720-013 $14.94SFR 206-720-014 $14.94SFR 206-720-015 $14.94SFR 206-720-016 $14.94SFR 206-720-017 $14.94SFR 206-720-018 $14.94SFR 206-720-019 $14.94SFR 206-720-020 $14.94SFR 206-720-021 $14.94SFR 206-720-022 $14.94SFR 206-720-023 $14.94SFR 206-720-024 $14.94SFR 206-720-025 $14.94SFR 206-720-026 $14.94SFR 206-720-027 $14.94SFR 206-720-028 $14.94SFR 206-720-029 $14.94SFR 206-720-030 $14.94SFR 206-720-031 $14.94SFR 206-720-032 $14.94SFR 206-720-033 $14.94SFR 206-720-034 $14.94SFR 206-720-035 $14.94SFR 206-720-036 $14.94SFR 206-720-037 $14.94SFR 206-720-038 $14.94SFR 206-720-039 $14.94SFR 206-720-040 $14.94SFR 206-720-041 $14.94SFR 206-720-042 $14.94SFR 206-720-043 $14.94SFR 206-720-044 $14.94SFR 206-720-045 $14.94SFR 206-720-046 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-720-047 $14.94SFR 206-720-048 $14.94SFR 206-720-049 $14.94SFR 206-720-050 $14.94SFR 206-720-051 $14.94SFR 206-720-052 $14.94SFR 206-720-053 $14.94SFR 206-720-054 $14.94SFR 206-720-055 $14.94SFR 206-720-056 $14.94SFR 206-720-057 $14.94SFR 206-720-058 $14.94SFR 206-720-059 $14.94SFR 206-720-060 $14.94SFR 206-720-061 $14.94SFR 206-720-062 $14.94SFR 206-720-063 $14.94SFR 206-720-064 $14.94SFR 206-720-065 $14.94SFR 206-720-066 $14.94SFR 206-720-067 $14.94SFR 206-720-068 $14.94SFR 206-720-069 $14.94SFR 206-720-070 $14.94SFR 206-720-071 $14.94SFR 206-720-072 $14.94SFR 206-720-073 $14.94SFR 206-720-074 $14.94SFR 206-720-075 $14.94SFR 206-720-076 $14.94SFR 206-720-077 $14.94SFR 206-720-078 $14.94SFR 206-730-001 $14.94SFR 206-730-002 $14.94SFR 206-730-003 $14.94SFR 206-730-004 $14.94SFR 206-730-005 $14.94SFR 206-730-006 $14.94SFR 206-730-007 $14.94SFR 206-730-008 $14.94SFR 206-730-009 $14.94SFR 206-730-010 $14.94SFR 206-730-011 $14.94SFR 206-730-012 $14.94SFR 206-730-013 $14.94SFR 206-730-014 $14.94SFR 206-730-015 $14.94SFR 206-730-016 $14.94SFR 206-730-017 $14.94SFR 206-730-018 $14.94SFR 206-730-019 $14.94SFR 206-730-020 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-730-021 $14.94SFR 206-730-022 $14.94SFR 206-730-023 $14.94SFR 206-730-024 $14.94SFR 206-730-025 $14.94SFR 206-730-026 $14.94SFR 206-730-030 $14.94SFR 206-730-031 $14.94SFR 206-730-032 $14.94SFR 206-730-033 $14.94SFR 206-730-034 $14.94SFR 206-730-035 $14.94SFR 206-730-036 $14.94SFR 206-730-037 $14.94SFR 206-730-038 $14.94SFR 206-730-039 $14.94SFR 206-730-040 $14.94SFR 206-730-041 $14.94SFR 206-730-042 $14.94SFR 206-730-043 $14.94SFR 206-730-044 $14.94SFR 206-730-045 $14.94SFR 206-730-046 $14.94SFR 206-730-047 $14.94SFR 206-730-048 $14.94SFR 206-730-049 $14.94SFR 206-730-050 $14.94SFR 206-730-051 $14.94SFR 206-730-052 $14.94SFR 206-740-001 $14.94SFR 206-740-002 $14.94SFR 206-740-003 $14.94SFR 206-740-004 $14.94SFR 206-740-005 $14.94SFR 206-740-006 $14.94SFR 206-740-007 $14.94SFR 206-740-008 $14.94SFR 206-740-009 $14.94SFR 206-740-010 $14.94SFR 206-740-011 $14.94SFR 206-740-012 $14.94SFR 206-740-013 $14.94SFR 206-740-014 $14.94SFR 206-740-015 $14.94SFR 206-740-016 $14.94SFR 206-740-017 $14.94SFR 206-740-018 $14.94SFR 206-740-019 $14.94SFR 206-740-020 $14.94SFR 206-740-021 $14.94SFR 206-740-022 $14.94SFR 206-740-023 $14.94SFR - 127 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-740-024 $14.94SFR 206-740-025 $14.94SFR 206-740-026 $14.94SFR 206-740-027 $14.94SFR 206-740-028 $14.94SFR 206-740-029 $14.94SFR 206-750-001 $14.94SFR 206-750-002 $14.94SFR 206-750-003 $14.94SFR 206-750-004 $14.94SFR 206-750-005 $14.94SFR 206-750-006 $14.94SFR 206-750-007 $14.94SFR 206-750-008 $14.94SFR 206-750-009 $14.94SFR 206-750-010 $14.94SFR 206-750-011 $14.94SFR 206-750-012 $14.94SFR 206-750-013 $14.94SFR 206-750-014 $14.94SFR 206-750-015 $14.94SFR 206-750-016 $14.94SFR 206-750-017 $14.94SFR 206-750-018 $14.94SFR 206-750-019 $14.94SFR 206-750-020 $14.94SFR 206-750-021 $14.94SFR 206-750-022 $14.94SFR 206-750-023 $14.94SFR 206-750-024 $14.94SFR 206-750-025 $14.94SFR 206-750-026 $14.94SFR 206-750-027 $14.94SFR 206-750-028 $14.94SFR 206-750-029 $14.94SFR 206-750-030 $14.94SFR 206-750-031 $14.94SFR 206-750-032 $14.94SFR 206-750-033 $14.94SFR 206-750-034 $14.94SFR 206-750-035 $14.94SFR 206-750-036 $14.94SFR 206-750-037 $14.94SFR 206-750-038 $14.94SFR 206-750-039 $14.94SFR 206-750-040 $14.94SFR 206-750-041 $14.94SFR 206-750-042 $14.94SFR 206-750-043 $14.94SFR 206-750-044 $14.94SFR 206-750-045 $14.94SFR 206-750-046 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-750-047 $14.94SFR 206-750-048 $14.94SFR 206-750-049 $14.94SFR 206-750-050 $14.94SFR 206-750-051 $14.94SFR 206-750-052 $14.94SFR 206-750-053 $14.94SFR 206-750-054 $14.94SFR 206-750-055 $14.94SFR 206-750-056 $14.94SFR 206-750-057 $14.94SFR 206-750-058 $14.94SFR 206-750-059 $14.94SFR 206-750-060 $14.94SFR 206-750-061 $14.94SFR 206-750-062 $14.94SFR 206-750-063 $14.94SFR 206-750-064 $14.94SFR 206-750-065 $14.94SFR 206-750-066 $14.94SFR 206-750-067 $14.94SFR 206-750-068 $14.94SFR 206-750-069 $14.94SFR 206-750-070 $14.94SFR 206-750-071 $14.94SFR 206-750-072 $14.94SFR 206-750-073 $14.94SFR 206-750-074 $14.94SFR 206-750-075 $14.94SFR 206-750-076 $14.94SFR 206-750-077 $14.94SFR 206-750-078 $14.94SFR 206-750-079 $14.94SFR 206-750-080 $14.94SFR 206-750-081 $14.94SFR 206-750-082 $14.94SFR 206-750-083 $14.94SFR 206-750-084 $14.94SFR 206-750-085 $14.94SFR 206-750-086 $14.94SFR 206-750-087 $14.94SFR 206-750-088 $14.94SFR 206-750-089 $14.94SFR 206-750-090 $14.94SFR 206-760-001 $14.94SFR 206-760-002 $14.94SFR 206-760-003 $14.94SFR 206-760-004 $14.94SFR 206-760-005 $14.94SFR 206-760-006 $7.46VSFR 206-760-007 $14.94SFR 206-760-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-760-009 $14.94SFR 206-760-010 $7.46VSFR 206-760-011 $14.94SFR 206-760-012 $14.94SFR 206-760-013 $14.94SFR 206-760-014 $7.46VSFR 206-760-015 $14.94SFR 206-760-016 $14.94SFR 206-760-017 $14.94SFR 206-760-018 $7.46VSFR 206-760-019 $14.94SFR 206-760-020 $14.94SFR 206-760-021 $14.94SFR 206-770-001 $14.94SFR 206-770-002 $14.94SFR 206-770-003 $14.94SFR 206-770-004 $14.94SFR 206-770-005 $14.94SFR 206-770-006 $14.94SFR 206-770-007 $7.46VSFR 206-770-008 $14.94SFR 206-770-009 $14.94SFR 206-770-010 $14.94SFR 206-770-011 $7.46VSFR 206-770-012 $14.94SFR 206-770-013 $14.94SFR 206-770-014 $7.46VSFR 206-770-015 $14.94SFR 206-770-016 $14.94SFR 206-770-017 $14.94SFR 206-770-018 $14.94SFR 206-770-019 $14.94SFR 206-770-020 $14.94SFR 206-770-021 $14.94SFR 206-770-022 $7.46VSFR 206-770-023 $14.94SFR 206-770-024 $7.46VSFR 206-770-025 $14.94SFR 206-770-026 $7.46VSFR 206-770-027 $14.94SFR 206-780-001 $14.94SFR 206-780-002 $7.46VSFR 206-780-003 $7.46VSFR 206-780-004 $7.46VSFR 206-780-005 $7.46VSFR 206-780-006 $7.46VSFR 206-780-007 $7.46VSFR 206-780-008 $7.46VSFR 206-780-009 $7.46VSFR 206-780-010 $7.46VSFR 206-780-011 $7.46VSFR 206-780-012 $7.46VSFR - 128 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-780-013 $7.46VSFR 206-780-014 $7.46VSFR 206-780-015 $7.46VSFR 206-780-016 $7.46VSFR 206-780-017 $7.46VSFR 206-780-018 $7.46VSFR 206-790-001 $7.46VSFR 206-790-002 $7.46VSFR 206-790-003 $7.46VSFR 206-790-004 $7.46VSFR 206-790-005 $14.94SFR 206-790-006 $7.46VSFR 206-790-007 $7.46VSFR 206-790-008 $7.46VSFR 206-790-009 $7.46VSFR 206-790-010 $7.46VSFR 206-790-011 $7.46VSFR 206-790-012 $14.94SFR 206-790-013 $14.94SFR 206-790-014 $14.94SFR 206-790-015 $7.46VSFR 206-790-016 $7.46VSFR 206-790-017 $7.46VSFR 206-790-018 $7.46VSFR 206-790-019 $7.46VSFR 206-790-020 $7.46VSFR 206-790-021 $7.46VSFR 206-790-022 $7.46VSFR 206-790-023 $7.46VSFR 206-790-024 $7.46VSFR 206-790-025 $14.94SFR 206-790-026 $7.46VSFR 206-790-027 $7.46VSFR 206-790-028 $7.46VSFR 206-790-029 $7.46VSFR 206-800-001 $7.46VSFR 206-800-002 $7.46VSFR 206-800-003 $14.94SFR 206-800-004 $14.94SFR 206-800-005 $14.94SFR 206-800-006 $14.94SFR 206-800-007 $14.94SFR 206-800-008 $14.94SFR 206-800-009 $14.94SFR 206-800-010 $14.94SFR 206-800-011 $14.94SFR 206-800-012 $14.94SFR 206-800-013 $14.94SFR 206-800-014 $14.94SFR 206-800-015 $14.94SFR 206-800-016 $14.94SFR 206-800-017 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-800-018 $14.94SFR 206-800-019 $14.94SFR 206-800-020 $14.94SFR 206-800-021 $14.94SFR 206-800-022 $14.94SFR 206-800-023 $14.94SFR 206-800-024 $14.94SFR 206-800-025 $14.94SFR 206-800-026 $14.94SFR 206-800-027 $14.94SFR 206-800-028 $14.94SFR 206-800-029 $14.94SFR 206-800-030 $14.94SFR 206-800-031 $14.94SFR 206-800-032 $14.94SFR 206-800-033 $14.94SFR 206-800-034 $14.94SFR 206-800-035 $14.94SFR 206-800-036 $14.94SFR 206-800-037 $14.94SFR 206-800-038 $14.94SFR 206-800-039 $14.94SFR 206-800-040 $14.94SFR 206-800-041 $14.94SFR 206-800-042 $14.94SFR 206-800-043 $14.94SFR 206-800-044 $14.94SFR 206-800-045 $14.94SFR 206-800-046 $7.46VSFR 206-800-047 $7.46VSFR 206-800-048 $7.46VSFR 206-800-049 $7.46VSFR 206-800-050 $7.46VSFR 206-800-051 $14.94SFR 206-800-052 $14.94SFR 206-800-053 $14.94SFR 206-800-054 $7.46VSFR 206-800-055 $7.46VSFR 206-800-056 $7.46VSFR 206-800-057 $14.94SFR 206-800-058 $14.94SFR 206-800-059 $14.94SFR 206-800-060 $14.94SFR 206-800-061 $14.94SFR 206-800-062 $14.94SFR 206-800-063 $14.94SFR 206-800-064 $14.94SFR 206-800-065 $14.94SFR 206-800-066 $14.94SFR 206-800-067 $14.94SFR 206-810-001 $14.94SFR 206-810-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-810-003 $14.94SFR 206-810-004 $14.94SFR 206-810-005 $14.94SFR 206-810-006 $14.94SFR 206-810-007 $14.94SFR 206-810-008 $14.94SFR 206-810-009 $14.94SFR 206-810-010 $14.94SFR 206-810-011 $14.94SFR 206-810-012 $14.94SFR 206-810-013 $14.94SFR 206-810-014 $14.94SFR 206-810-015 $14.94SFR 206-810-016 $14.94SFR 206-810-017 $14.94SFR 206-810-018 $14.94SFR 206-810-019 $14.94SFR 206-810-020 $14.94SFR 206-810-021 $14.94SFR 206-810-022 $14.94SFR 206-810-023 $14.94SFR 206-810-024 $14.94SFR 206-810-025 $14.94SFR 206-810-026 $14.94SFR 206-810-027 $14.94SFR 206-810-028 $14.94SFR 206-810-029 $14.94SFR 206-810-030 $14.94SFR 206-810-031 $14.94SFR 206-820-001 $14.94SFR 206-820-002 $14.94SFR 206-820-003 $14.94SFR 206-820-004 $14.94SFR 206-820-005 $14.94SFR 206-820-006 $14.94SFR 206-820-007 $14.94SFR 206-820-008 $14.94SFR 206-820-009 $14.94SFR 206-820-010 $14.94SFR 206-820-011 $14.94SFR 206-820-012 $14.94SFR 206-820-013 $14.94SFR 206-820-014 $14.94SFR 206-820-015 $14.94SFR 206-820-016 $14.94SFR 206-820-017 $14.94SFR 206-820-018 $14.94SFR 206-820-019 $14.94SFR 206-820-020 $14.94SFR 206-820-021 $14.94SFR 206-820-022 $14.94SFR 206-820-023 $7.46VSFR - 129 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 206-820-024 $7.46VSFR 206-820-025 $7.46VSFR 206-820-026 $14.94SFR 206-820-027 $14.94SFR 206-820-028 $14.94SFR 206-820-029 $14.94SFR 206-820-030 $14.94SFR 206-820-031 $7.46VSFR 206-820-032 $7.46VSFR 206-820-033 $7.46VSFR 206-820-034 $7.46VSFR 206-820-035 $7.46VSFR 206-820-036 $14.94SFR 206-820-037 $7.46VSFR 206-820-038 $7.46VSFR 206-820-039 $7.46VSFR 206-820-040 $7.46VSFR 206-820-041 $7.46VSFR 206-820-042 $7.46VSFR 206-820-043 $7.46VSFR 206-820-044 $7.46VSFR 206-820-045 $7.46VSFR 206-820-046 $7.46VSFR 206-820-047 $7.46VSFR 206-820-048 $7.46VSFR 206-820-049 $7.46VSFR 206-820-050 $7.46VSFR 206-820-051 $14.94SFR 206-820-052 $14.94SFR 206-820-053 $7.46VSFR 206-820-054 $7.46VSFR 206-820-055 $14.94SFR 206-820-056 $14.94SFR 206-820-057 $14.94SFR 206-820-058 $14.94SFR 206-820-059 $14.94SFR 206-820-060 $14.94SFR 206-820-061 $14.94SFR 209-040-001 $7.46MISC 211-210-017 $7.46MISC 211-210-029 $7.46MISC 211-210-054 $14.94SFR 211-210-055 $14.94SFR 211-220-001 $7.46MISC 211-220-002 $14.94SFR 211-220-007 $14.94SFR 211-230-016 $7.46MISC 211-240-001 $14.94SFR 211-240-002 $7.46VSFR 211-240-008 $14.94SFR 211-240-009 $14.94SFR 211-240-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 211-240-011 $14.94SFR 211-240-012 $14.94SFR 211-240-013 $14.94SFR 211-240-014 $14.94SFR 211-240-015 $14.94SFR 211-240-016 $14.94SFR 211-250-001 $14.94SFR 211-250-002 $14.94SFR 211-250-003 $14.94SFR 211-250-004 $14.94SFR 211-250-005 $14.94SFR 211-250-006 $14.94SFR 211-250-007 $14.94SFR 211-250-008 $14.94SFR 211-250-009 $14.94SFR 211-250-010 $14.94SFR 211-250-011 $14.94SFR 211-250-016 $14.94SFR 211-250-017 $14.94SFR 211-250-018 $14.94SFR 211-250-019 $14.94SFR 211-260-001 $14.94SFR 211-260-002 $14.94SFR 211-260-003 $14.94SFR 211-260-004 $14.94SFR 211-260-005 $14.94SFR 211-260-006 $14.94SFR 211-260-007 $14.94SFR 211-260-008 $14.94SFR 211-260-009 $14.94SFR 211-260-010 $14.94SFR 211-260-011 $14.94SFR 211-260-012 $14.94SFR 211-260-013 $14.94SFR 211-260-014 $14.94SFR 211-260-015 $14.94SFR 211-260-016 $14.94SFR 211-260-017 $14.94SFR 211-260-018 $14.94SFR 211-270-001 $14.94SFR 211-270-002 $14.94SFR 211-270-003 $14.94SFR 211-270-004 $14.94SFR 211-270-005 $14.94SFR 211-270-006 $14.94SFR 211-270-007 $14.94SFR 211-270-008 $14.94SFR 211-270-009 $14.94SFR 211-270-010 $14.94SFR 211-270-011 $14.94SFR 211-280-001 $14.94SFR 211-280-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 211-280-003 $14.94SFR 211-280-004 $14.94SFR 211-280-005 $14.94SFR 211-280-006 $14.94SFR 211-280-007 $14.94SFR 211-280-008 $14.94SFR 211-280-009 $14.94SFR 211-280-010 $14.94SFR 211-280-011 $14.94SFR 211-280-012 $14.94SFR 211-280-013 $14.94SFR 211-280-014 $14.94SFR 211-280-015 $14.94SFR 211-280-016 $14.94SFR 211-280-017 $14.94SFR 211-280-018 $14.94SFR 211-280-019 $14.94SFR 211-280-020 $14.94SFR 211-280-021 $14.94SFR 211-280-022 $14.94SFR 211-280-023 $14.94SFR 211-280-024 $14.94SFR 211-280-025 $14.94SFR 211-280-026 $14.94SFR 211-280-027 $14.94SFR 211-280-028 $14.94SFR 211-280-029 $14.94SFR 211-280-030 $14.94SFR 211-280-031 $14.94SFR 211-280-032 $14.94SFR 211-280-033 $14.94SFR 211-280-034 $14.94SFR 211-280-035 $14.94SFR 211-280-036 $14.94SFR 211-280-037 $14.94SFR 211-280-038 $14.94SFR 211-280-039 $14.94SFR 211-290-001 $14.94SFR 211-290-002 $14.94SFR 211-290-003 $14.94SFR 211-290-004 $14.94SFR 211-290-005 $14.94SFR 211-290-006 $14.94SFR 211-290-007 $14.94SFR 211-290-008 $14.94SFR 211-290-009 $14.94SFR 211-290-010 $14.94SFR 211-290-011 $14.94SFR 211-290-012 $14.94SFR 211-290-013 $14.94SFR 211-290-014 $14.94SFR 211-290-015 $14.94SFR - 130 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 211-290-016 $14.94SFR 211-290-017 $14.94SFR 211-290-018 $14.94SFR 211-290-019 $14.94SFR 211-290-020 $14.94SFR 211-300-001 $14.94SFR 211-300-002 $14.94SFR 211-300-003 $14.94SFR 211-300-004 $14.94SFR 211-300-005 $14.94SFR 211-300-006 $14.94SFR 211-300-007 $14.94SFR 211-300-008 $14.94SFR 211-300-009 $14.94SFR 211-300-010 $14.94SFR 211-300-011 $14.94SFR 211-300-012 $14.94SFR 211-300-013 $14.94SFR 211-300-014 $14.94SFR 211-300-015 $14.94SFR 211-300-016 $14.94SFR 211-300-017 $14.94SFR 211-300-018 $14.94SFR 211-300-019 $14.94SFR 211-300-020 $14.94SFR 211-300-021 $14.94SFR 211-300-022 $14.94SFR 211-300-023 $14.94SFR 211-300-024 $14.94SFR 211-300-025 $14.94SFR 211-300-026 $14.94SFR 211-300-027 $14.94SFR 211-310-001 $14.94SFR 211-310-002 $14.94SFR 211-310-006 $14.94SFR 211-310-007 $14.94SFR 211-310-008 $14.94SFR 211-310-009 $14.94SFR 211-310-010 $14.94SFR 211-310-011 $14.94SFR 211-310-012 $14.94SFR 211-310-013 $14.94SFR 211-310-014 $14.94SFR 211-310-015 $14.94SFR 211-310-016 $14.94SFR 211-310-017 $14.94SFR 211-310-018 $14.94SFR 211-310-019 $14.94SFR 211-310-020 $14.94SFR 211-310-021 $14.94SFR 211-310-026 $14.94SFR 211-310-027 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 211-310-028 $14.94SFR 211-320-001 $14.94SFR 211-320-002 $14.94SFR 211-320-003 $14.94SFR 211-320-004 $14.94SFR 211-320-005 $14.94SFR 211-320-006 $14.94SFR 211-320-007 $14.94SFR 211-320-008 $14.94SFR 211-320-009 $14.94SFR 211-320-010 $14.94SFR 211-320-011 $14.94SFR 211-320-012 $14.94SFR 211-320-013 $14.94SFR 211-320-014 $14.94SFR 211-320-015 $14.94SFR 211-320-016 $14.94SFR 211-320-017 $14.94SFR 211-320-018 $14.94SFR 211-330-001 $14.94SFR 211-330-002 $14.94SFR 211-330-003 $14.94SFR 211-330-004 $14.94SFR 211-330-005 $14.94SFR 211-330-006 $14.94SFR 211-330-007 $14.94SFR 211-330-008 $14.94SFR 211-330-009 $14.94SFR 211-340-001 $14.94SFR 211-340-002 $14.94SFR 211-340-003 $14.94SFR 211-340-004 $14.94SFR 211-340-005 $14.94SFR 211-340-006 $14.94SFR 211-340-007 $14.94SFR 211-350-001 $14.94SFR 211-350-002 $14.94SFR 211-350-005 $14.94SFR 211-350-006 $14.94SFR 211-350-007 $7.46VSFR 211-350-008 $14.94SFR 211-350-009 $14.94SFR 211-350-010 $14.94SFR 211-350-011 $14.94SFR 211-350-012 $14.94SFR 211-350-013 $14.94SFR 211-350-014 $14.94SFR 211-350-015 $14.94SFR 211-350-016 $14.94SFR 211-350-017 $14.94SFR 211-350-026 $14.94SFR 211-350-027 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 211-360-001 $14.94SFR 211-360-002 $14.94SFR 211-360-003 $14.94SFR 211-360-004 $14.94SFR 211-360-005 $14.94SFR 211-360-006 $14.94SFR 211-360-007 $14.94SFR 211-360-008 $14.94SFR 211-360-009 $14.94SFR 211-360-010 $14.94SFR 211-360-011 $14.94SFR 211-360-012 $14.94SFR 211-360-013 $14.94SFR 211-360-014 $14.94SFR 211-360-015 $14.94SFR 211-360-016 $14.94SFR 211-360-017 $14.94SFR 211-360-018 $14.94SFR 211-360-019 $14.94SFR 211-360-020 $14.94SFR 211-360-021 $14.94SFR 211-360-022 $14.94SFR 211-360-023 $14.94SFR 211-360-024 $14.94SFR 211-360-025 $14.94SFR 211-360-026 $14.94SFR 211-360-027 $14.94SFR 211-360-028 $14.94SFR 211-360-029 $14.94SFR 211-360-030 $14.94SFR 211-360-031 $14.94SFR 211-360-032 $14.94SFR 211-360-033 $14.94SFR 211-360-034 $14.94SFR 211-360-035 $14.94SFR 211-360-036 $14.94SFR 211-360-037 $14.94SFR 211-360-038 $14.94SFR 211-360-039 $14.94SFR 211-360-040 $14.94SFR 211-360-041 $14.94SFR 211-360-042 $14.94SFR 211-360-043 $14.94SFR 211-370-001 $14.94SFR 211-370-002 $14.94SFR 211-370-003 $14.94SFR 211-370-004 $14.94SFR 211-370-005 $14.94SFR 211-370-006 $14.94SFR 211-370-007 $14.94SFR 211-370-008 $14.94SFR 211-370-009 $14.94SFR - 131 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 211-370-010 $14.94SFR 211-370-011 $14.94SFR 211-370-012 $14.94SFR 211-370-013 $14.94SFR 211-370-014 $14.94SFR 211-370-015 $14.94SFR 211-370-016 $14.94SFR 211-370-017 $14.94SFR 211-370-018 $14.94SFR 211-370-019 $14.94SFR 211-370-020 $14.94SFR 211-370-021 $14.94SFR 211-370-022 $14.94SFR 211-370-023 $14.94SFR 211-370-024 $14.94SFR 211-370-025 $14.94SFR 211-370-026 $14.94SFR 211-370-027 $14.94SFR 211-370-028 $14.94SFR 211-370-029 $14.94SFR 211-370-030 $14.94SFR 211-370-031 $14.94SFR 211-370-032 $14.94SFR 211-370-033 $14.94SFR 211-370-034 $14.94SFR 211-370-035 $14.94SFR 211-370-036 $14.94SFR 211-370-037 $14.94SFR 211-370-038 $14.94SFR 211-370-039 $14.94SFR 211-370-040 $14.94SFR 211-370-041 $14.94SFR 211-370-042 $14.94SFR 211-370-043 $14.94SFR 211-370-044 $14.94SFR 211-370-045 $14.94SFR 211-370-046 $14.94SFR 211-370-047 $14.94SFR 211-370-048 $14.94SFR 211-370-049 $14.94SFR 211-370-050 $14.94SFR 211-370-051 $14.94SFR 211-370-052 $14.94SFR 211-370-053 $14.94SFR 211-370-054 $14.94SFR 211-370-055 $14.94SFR 211-370-056 $14.94SFR 211-370-057 $14.94SFR 211-370-058 $14.94SFR 211-380-001 $14.94SFR 211-380-002 $14.94SFR 211-380-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 211-380-004 $14.94SFR 211-380-005 $14.94SFR 211-380-006 $14.94SFR 211-380-007 $14.94SFR 211-380-008 $14.94SFR 211-380-009 $14.94SFR 211-380-010 $14.94SFR 211-380-011 $14.94SFR 211-380-012 $14.94SFR 211-380-013 $14.94SFR 211-380-014 $14.94SFR 211-380-015 $14.94SFR 211-380-016 $14.94SFR 211-380-017 $14.94SFR 211-380-018 $14.94SFR 211-380-019 $14.94SFR 211-380-020 $14.94SFR 211-380-021 $14.94SFR 211-380-022 $14.94SFR 211-380-023 $14.94SFR 211-380-024 $14.94SFR 211-380-025 $14.94SFR 211-380-027 $14.94SFR 211-380-028 $14.94SFR 211-380-029 $14.94SFR 211-380-030 $14.94SFR 211-380-031 $14.94SFR 211-380-032 $14.94SFR 211-380-033 $14.94SFR 211-380-034 $14.94SFR 211-380-035 $14.94SFR 211-380-036 $14.94SFR 211-380-037 $14.94SFR 211-380-038 $14.94SFR 211-380-039 $14.94SFR 211-380-050 $14.94SFR 211-400-004 $14.94SFR 215-110-004 $14.94SFR 215-110-005 $14.94SFR 215-110-006 $14.94SFR 215-110-011 $14.94SFR 215-110-012 $14.94SFR 215-110-013 $14.94SFR 215-120-001 $14.94SFR 215-120-002 $14.94SFR 215-120-003 $14.94SFR 215-120-004 $14.94SFR 215-120-005 $14.94SFR 215-120-006 $14.94SFR 215-120-007 $14.94SFR 215-120-009 $14.94SFR 215-120-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 215-120-012 $14.94SFR 215-120-013 $14.94SFR 215-120-014 $14.94SFR 215-120-015 $14.94SFR 215-120-017 $14.94SFR 215-130-001 $14.94SFR 215-130-002 $14.94SFR 215-130-008 $14.94SFR 215-130-009 $14.94SFR 215-130-010 $14.94SFR 215-130-011 $14.94SFR 215-130-012 $14.94SFR 215-130-013 $14.94SFR 215-130-015 $14.94SFR 215-130-017 $14.94SFR 215-140-001 $14.94SFR 215-140-008 $14.94SFR 215-140-009 $14.94SFR 215-140-010 $14.94SFR 215-140-011 $14.94SFR 215-140-012 $14.94SFR 215-140-013 $14.94SFR 215-140-015 $14.94SFR 215-140-020 $7.46VSFR 215-150-001 $14.94SFR 215-150-002 $14.94SFR 215-150-003 $14.94SFR 215-150-004 $14.94SFR 215-150-005 $14.94SFR 215-150-006 $14.94SFR 215-150-007 $14.94SFR 215-160-001 $14.94SFR 215-160-002 $7.46VSFR 215-160-003 $14.94SFR 215-160-004 $14.94SFR 215-160-005 $14.94SFR 215-160-008 $14.94SFR 215-160-009 $14.94SFR 215-160-010 $14.94SFR 215-200-002 $14.94SFR 215-200-006 $14.94SFR 215-200-007 $14.94SFR 215-200-013 $14.94SFR 215-200-014 $14.94SFR 215-200-015 $14.94SFR 215-200-016 $14.94SFR 215-200-018 $14.94SFR 215-200-022 $14.94SFR 215-200-025 $14.94SFR 215-200-031 $14.94SFR 215-200-037 $14.94SFR 215-200-045 $14.94SFR - 132 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 215-200-047 $14.94SFR 215-200-048 $14.94SFR 215-200-049 $14.94SFR 215-200-050 $14.94SFR 215-200-051 $14.94SFR 215-200-052 $14.94SFR 215-200-053 $14.94SFR 215-200-054 $14.94SFR 215-200-055 $14.94SFR 215-200-056 $14.94SFR 215-200-057 $14.94SFR 215-200-058 $14.94SFR 215-200-059 $14.94SFR 215-200-060 $14.94SFR 215-200-061 $14.94SFR 215-200-062 $14.94SFR 215-200-063 $14.94SFR 215-200-064 $14.94SFR 215-200-065 $14.94SFR 215-200-066 $14.94SFR 215-200-067 $14.94SFR 215-200-068 $14.94SFR 215-200-069 $14.94SFR 215-200-070 $14.94SFR 215-200-072 $14.94SFR 215-200-074 $14.94SFR 215-200-075 $14.94SFR 215-200-076 $14.94SFR 215-210-001 $14.94SFR 215-210-002 $14.94SFR 215-210-003 $14.94SFR 215-210-005 $14.94SFR 215-210-006 $14.94SFR 215-210-007 $14.94SFR 215-210-008 $14.94SFR 215-210-020 $14.94SFR 220-060-020 $7.46VCOM 220-080-033 $14.94SFR 220-080-035 $14.94SFR 220-080-037 $14.94SFR 220-080-038 $14.94SFR 220-080-040 $14.94SFR 220-090-002 $7.46VSFR 220-090-003 $7.46VSFR 220-090-004 $14.94SFR 220-090-012 $14.94SFR 220-100-024 $7.46MISC 220-100-025 $7.46MISC 220-100-026 $7.46MISC 220-110-001 $14.94SFR 220-110-002 $14.94SFR 220-110-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-110-004 $14.94SFR 220-110-007 $14.94SFR 220-110-008 $14.94SFR 220-110-009 $14.94SFR 220-110-010 $14.94SFR 220-110-011 $14.94SFR 220-110-012 $14.94SFR 220-110-013 $14.94SFR 220-110-014 $14.94SFR 220-110-015 $14.94SFR 220-110-016 $14.94SFR 220-110-017 $14.94SFR 220-110-018 $14.94SFR 220-110-019 $14.94SFR 220-110-020 $14.94SFR 220-110-021 $14.94SFR 220-110-022 $14.94SFR 220-110-023 $14.94SFR 220-110-025 $14.94SFR 220-110-026 $14.94SFR 220-110-028 $14.94SFR 220-110-029 $14.94SFR 220-110-031 $14.94SFR 220-110-032 $14.94SFR 220-110-037 $14.94SFR 220-110-038 $14.94SFR 220-110-040 $14.94SFR 220-110-041 $14.94SFR 220-110-043 $14.94SFR 220-130-002 $14.94SFR 220-130-003 $14.94SFR 220-130-004 $14.94SFR 220-130-005 $14.94SFR 220-130-006 $14.94SFR 220-130-007 $14.94SFR 220-130-008 $14.94SFR 220-130-010 $14.94SFR 220-130-011 $14.94SFR 220-130-012 $14.94SFR 220-130-015 $14.94SFR 220-130-016 $14.94SFR 220-130-017 $14.94SFR 220-140-001 $14.94SFR 220-140-002 $14.94SFR 220-140-003 $14.94SFR 220-140-004 $14.94SFR 220-140-005 $14.94SFR 220-140-006 $14.94SFR 220-140-007 $14.94SFR 220-140-008 $14.94SFR 220-140-010 $14.94SFR 220-140-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-140-012 $14.94SFR 220-140-013 $14.94SFR 220-140-014 $14.94SFR 220-140-015 $14.94SFR 220-140-016 $14.94SFR 220-140-017 $14.94SFR 220-140-018 $14.94SFR 220-140-019 $14.94SFR 220-140-020 $14.94SFR 220-140-021 $14.94SFR 220-140-022 $14.94SFR 220-140-023 $14.94SFR 220-140-024 $14.94SFR 220-140-025 $14.94SFR 220-140-029 $14.94SFR 220-140-030 $14.94SFR 220-140-032 $74.70COM 220-140-035 $14.94SFR 220-140-036 $14.94SFR 220-140-037 $14.94SFR 220-140-039 $14.94SFR 220-150-003 $74.70COM 220-160-001 $14.94SFR 220-160-002 $14.94SFR 220-160-003 $14.94SFR 220-160-004 $14.94SFR 220-160-007 $14.94SFR 220-160-008 $14.94SFR 220-160-009 $14.94SFR 220-160-013 $14.94SFR 220-160-014 $14.94SFR 220-160-015 $14.94SFR 220-160-016 $14.94SFR 220-170-001 $14.94SFR 220-170-002 $14.94SFR 220-170-003 $14.94SFR 220-170-004 $14.94SFR 220-170-005 $14.94SFR 220-170-006 $14.94SFR 220-170-007 $14.94SFR 220-170-008 $14.94SFR 220-170-009 $14.94SFR 220-170-010 $14.94SFR 220-170-018 $14.94SFR 220-170-019 $14.94SFR 220-170-020 $14.94SFR 220-170-021 $14.94SFR 220-170-022 $14.94SFR 220-170-023 $14.94SFR 220-170-024 $14.94SFR 220-170-025 $14.94SFR 220-170-026 $14.94SFR - 133 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-170-027 $14.94SFR 220-170-028 $14.94SFR 220-170-029 $14.94SFR 220-170-030 $14.94SFR 220-170-031 $14.94SFR 220-170-032 $14.94SFR 220-170-033 $14.94SFR 220-170-034 $14.94SFR 220-170-035 $14.94SFR 220-170-038 $14.94SFR 220-170-039 $14.94SFR 220-170-043 $14.94SFR 220-170-044 $14.94SFR 220-170-045 $14.94SFR 220-170-046 $14.94SFR 220-170-047 $14.94SFR 220-170-048 $14.94SFR 220-170-049 $14.94SFR 220-170-050 $14.94SFR 220-170-051 $14.94SFR 220-170-053 $14.94SFR 220-170-054 $14.94SFR 220-170-055 $14.94SFR 220-170-057 $14.94SFR 220-180-001 $14.94SFR 220-180-003 $14.94SFR 220-180-004 $7.46VSFR 220-180-005 $14.94SFR 220-180-006 $14.94SFR 220-180-007 $14.94SFR 220-180-008 $14.94SFR 220-180-009 $14.94SFR 220-180-010 $14.94SFR 220-180-012 $14.94SFR 220-180-013 $14.94SFR 220-180-014 $14.94SFR 220-180-015 $14.94SFR 220-180-019 $14.94SFR 220-180-020 $74.70COM 220-180-021 $74.70COM 220-180-024 $14.94SFR 220-190-005 $14.94SFR 220-190-006 $14.94SFR 220-190-007 $14.94SFR 220-190-011 $14.94SFR 220-190-014 $14.94SFR 220-190-020 $14.94SFR 220-190-021 $14.94SFR 220-190-022 $14.94SFR 220-190-023 $14.94SFR 220-190-024 $14.94SFR 220-190-025 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-190-027 $14.94SFR 220-190-028 $14.94SFR 220-190-029 $14.94SFR 220-190-030 $14.94SFR 220-190-035 $14.94SFR 220-190-037 $14.94SFR 220-190-038 $14.94SFR 220-190-041 $14.94SFR 220-190-043 $14.94SFR 220-190-045 $14.94SFR 220-190-046 $14.94SFR 220-190-047 $14.94SFR 220-190-048 $14.94SFR 220-200-001 $14.94SFR 220-200-002 $14.94SFR 220-200-003 $14.94SFR 220-200-004 $14.94SFR 220-200-006 $14.94SFR 220-200-007 $14.94SFR 220-200-008 $14.94SFR 220-200-009 $14.94SFR 220-200-010 $14.94SFR 220-200-011 $14.94SFR 220-200-012 $14.94SFR 220-200-013 $14.94SFR 220-210-001 $14.94SFR 220-210-002 $14.94SFR 220-210-003 $14.94SFR 220-210-004 $14.94SFR 220-210-005 $14.94SFR 220-210-006 $14.94SFR 220-210-007 $14.94SFR 220-210-008 $14.94SFR 220-210-013 $14.94SFR 220-210-018 $14.94SFR 220-210-019 $14.94SFR 220-210-020 $14.94SFR 220-210-021 $14.94SFR 220-210-022 $14.94SFR 220-210-023 $14.94SFR 220-210-024 $14.94SFR 220-210-025 $14.94SFR 220-210-026 $14.94SFR 220-210-027 $14.94SFR 220-210-028 $14.94SFR 220-210-029 $14.94SFR 220-210-030 $14.94SFR 220-210-031 $14.94SFR 220-210-032 $14.94SFR 220-210-033 $14.94SFR 220-210-034 $14.94SFR 220-210-036 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-210-038 $14.94SFR 220-210-039 $14.94SFR 220-210-041 $14.94SFR 220-210-042 $14.94SFR 220-220-001 $14.94SFR 220-220-002 $14.94SFR 220-220-004 $14.94SFR 220-220-005 $14.94SFR 220-220-006 $14.94SFR 220-220-008 $14.94SFR 220-220-013 $14.94SFR 220-220-014 $14.94SFR 220-220-015 $14.94SFR 220-220-019 $14.94SFR 220-220-020 $14.94SFR 220-220-021 $14.94SFR 220-220-022 $14.94SFR 220-220-023 $14.94SFR 220-220-024 $14.94SFR 220-220-025 $14.94SFR 220-220-026 $14.94SFR 220-220-027 $14.94SFR 220-220-028 $14.94SFR 220-220-029 $14.94SFR 220-220-030 $14.94SFR 220-220-035 $14.94SFR 220-220-036 $14.94SFR 220-220-037 $14.94SFR 220-220-039 $14.94SFR 220-220-042 $14.94SFR 220-220-043 $14.94SFR 220-230-002 $14.94SFR 220-230-003 $14.94SFR 220-230-007 $14.94SFR 220-230-008 $14.94SFR 220-230-009 $14.94SFR 220-230-010 $14.94SFR 220-230-013 $14.94SFR 220-230-016 $14.94SFR 220-230-017 $14.94SFR 220-230-020 $14.94SFR 220-230-021 $14.94SFR 220-230-022 $14.94SFR 220-230-023 $14.94SFR 220-230-024 $14.94SFR 220-230-025 $14.94SFR 220-240-001 $14.94SFR 220-240-002 $14.94SFR 220-240-006 $14.94SFR 220-240-007 $14.94SFR 220-250-005 $14.94SFR 220-250-016 $14.94SFR - 134 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-250-017 $74.70COM 220-260-024 $14.94SFR 220-260-025 $14.94SFR 220-260-026 $14.94SFR 220-260-030 $14.94SFR 220-260-031 $14.94SFR 220-260-032 $14.94SFR 220-260-033 $14.94SFR 220-260-034 $14.94SFR 220-260-035 $14.94SFR 220-260-041 $14.94SFR 220-260-042 $14.94SFR 220-260-043 $14.94SFR 220-260-045 $14.94SFR 220-260-046 $14.94SFR 220-260-047 $14.94SFR 220-260-048 $14.94SFR 220-260-049 $14.94SFR 220-260-053 $14.94SFR 220-260-054 $14.94SFR 220-260-055 $14.94SFR 220-260-056 $14.94SFR 220-260-057 $14.94SFR 220-260-058 $14.94SFR 220-260-067 $14.94SFR 220-260-068 $14.94SFR 220-260-069 $14.94SFR 220-260-070 $14.94SFR 220-260-073 $14.94SFR 220-260-074 $14.94SFR 220-260-075 $14.94SFR 220-260-076 $14.94SFR 220-260-077 $14.94SFR 220-260-078 $14.94SFR 220-260-079 $14.94SFR 220-260-080 $14.94SFR 220-260-081 $14.94SFR 220-260-083 $14.94SFR 220-260-084 $14.94SFR 220-260-085 $14.94SFR 220-270-008 $14.94SFR 220-270-009 $14.94SFR 220-270-020 $14.94SFR 220-270-025 $14.94SFR 220-270-026 $14.94SFR 220-270-027 $14.94SFR 220-270-029 $14.94SFR 220-270-030 $14.94SFR 220-270-032 $14.94SFR 220-270-033 $14.94SFR 220-270-034 $14.94SFR 220-270-035 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-270-036 $14.94SFR 220-270-041 $14.94SFR 220-270-044 $14.94SFR 220-270-045 $14.94SFR 220-270-046 $14.94SFR 220-270-047 $14.94SFR 220-270-048 $14.94SFR 220-270-049 $14.94SFR 220-270-050 $14.94SFR 220-270-051 $14.94SFR 220-270-052 $14.94SFR 220-270-053 $14.94SFR 220-270-054 $14.94SFR 220-270-058 $14.94SFR 220-270-060 $14.94SFR 220-270-062 $14.94SFR 220-270-064 $14.94SFR 220-270-065 $14.94SFR 220-270-067 $14.94SFR 220-270-069 $14.94SFR 220-270-071 $14.94SFR 220-270-073 $14.94SFR 220-270-074 $14.94SFR 220-270-075 $14.94SFR 220-280-011 $14.94SFR 220-280-012 $14.94SFR 220-280-013 $14.94SFR 220-280-014 $14.94SFR 220-280-015 $14.94SFR 220-280-020 $14.94SFR 220-280-021 $14.94SFR 220-280-022 $14.94SFR 220-280-023 $14.94SFR 220-280-024 $14.94SFR 220-280-025 $14.94SFR 220-280-031 $74.70COM 220-290-001 $14.94SFR 220-290-002 $14.94SFR 220-290-003 $14.94SFR 220-290-006 $14.94SFR 220-290-007 $14.94SFR 220-290-008 $14.94SFR 220-290-009 $14.94SFR 220-290-010 $14.94SFR 220-290-011 $14.94SFR 220-290-012 $14.94SFR 220-290-013 $14.94SFR 220-290-014 $14.94SFR 220-290-015 $14.94SFR 220-290-016 $14.94SFR 220-290-017 $14.94SFR 220-290-018 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-290-019 $14.94SFR 220-290-020 $14.94SFR 220-290-021 $14.94SFR 220-290-022 $14.94SFR 220-290-023 $14.94SFR 220-290-024 $14.94SFR 220-290-025 $14.94SFR 220-290-026 $14.94SFR 220-290-027 $14.94SFR 220-290-028 $14.94SFR 220-290-040 $14.94SFR 220-290-041 $14.94SFR 220-290-042 $14.94SFR 220-290-043 $14.94SFR 220-290-044 $14.94SFR 220-290-045 $14.94SFR 220-290-046 $14.94SFR 220-290-049 $14.94SFR 220-290-054 $74.70COM 220-310-001 $14.94SFR 220-310-002 $14.94SFR 220-310-003 $14.94SFR 220-310-004 $14.94SFR 220-310-006 $14.94SFR 220-310-007 $14.94SFR 220-310-008 $14.94SFR 220-310-009 $14.94SFR 220-310-010 $14.94SFR 220-310-011 $14.94SFR 220-310-012 $14.94SFR 220-310-013 $14.94SFR 220-310-014 $74.70COM 220-310-018 $74.70COM 220-320-001 $14.94SFR 220-320-002 $14.94SFR 220-320-003 $14.94SFR 220-320-009 $14.94SFR 220-320-014 $74.70COM 220-320-018 $14.94SFR 220-320-019 $14.94SFR 220-320-023 $14.94SFR 220-320-024 $14.94SFR 220-320-025 $14.94SFR 220-330-012 $14.94SFR 220-330-023 $14.94SFR 220-330-024 $14.94SFR 220-341-001 $14.94SFR 220-341-002 $14.94SFR 220-341-003 $14.94SFR 220-341-004 $14.94SFR 220-341-005 $14.94SFR 220-341-006 $14.94SFR - 135 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-341-007 $14.94SFR 220-341-008 $14.94SFR 220-341-009 $14.94SFR 220-341-010 $14.94SFR 220-341-011 $14.94SFR 220-341-012 $14.94SFR 220-341-013 $14.94SFR 220-341-014 $14.94SFR 220-341-015 $14.94SFR 220-341-016 $14.94SFR 220-341-017 $14.94SFR 220-342-001 $14.94SFR 220-342-002 $14.94SFR 220-342-003 $14.94SFR 220-342-004 $14.94SFR 220-342-005 $14.94SFR 220-342-006 $14.94SFR 220-342-007 $14.94SFR 220-342-008 $14.94SFR 220-342-009 $14.94SFR 220-343-001 $14.94SFR 220-343-002 $14.94SFR 220-343-003 $14.94SFR 220-343-004 $14.94SFR 220-343-005 $14.94SFR 220-343-006 $14.94SFR 220-343-007 $14.94SFR 220-343-008 $14.94SFR 220-343-009 $14.94SFR 220-343-010 $14.94SFR 220-343-011 $14.94SFR 220-343-012 $14.94SFR 220-343-013 $14.94SFR 220-343-014 $14.94SFR 220-343-015 $14.94SFR 220-343-016 $14.94SFR 220-343-017 $14.94SFR 220-343-018 $14.94SFR 220-343-019 $14.94SFR 220-343-020 $14.94SFR 220-343-021 $14.94SFR 220-343-022 $14.94SFR 220-343-023 $14.94SFR 220-343-024 $14.94SFR 220-343-025 $14.94SFR 220-343-026 $14.94SFR 220-343-027 $14.94SFR 220-343-028 $14.94SFR 220-343-029 $14.94SFR 220-343-030 $14.94SFR 220-343-031 $14.94SFR 220-343-032 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-343-033 $14.94SFR 220-343-034 $14.94SFR 220-343-035 $14.94SFR 220-343-036 $14.94SFR 220-343-037 $14.94SFR 220-343-038 $14.94SFR 220-343-039 $14.94SFR 220-343-040 $14.94SFR 220-343-041 $14.94SFR 220-343-042 $14.94SFR 220-343-043 $14.94SFR 220-343-044 $14.94SFR 220-343-045 $14.94SFR 220-343-046 $14.94SFR 220-343-047 $14.94SFR 220-343-048 $14.94SFR 220-343-049 $14.94SFR 220-343-050 $14.94SFR 220-343-051 $14.94SFR 220-351-002 $14.94SFR 220-351-003 $14.94SFR 220-351-004 $14.94SFR 220-351-005 $14.94SFR 220-351-015 $14.94SFR 220-351-016 $14.94SFR 220-351-020 $14.94SFR 220-351-021 $14.94SFR 220-351-025 $74.70COM 220-361-001 $14.94SFR 220-361-002 $14.94SFR 220-361-003 $14.94SFR 220-361-004 $14.94SFR 220-361-005 $14.94SFR 220-361-006 $14.94SFR 220-361-007 $14.94SFR 220-361-008 $14.94SFR 220-361-009 $14.94SFR 220-361-010 $14.94SFR 220-361-011 $14.94SFR 220-361-012 $14.94SFR 220-361-013 $14.94SFR 220-361-014 $14.94SFR 220-361-015 $14.94SFR 220-361-016 $14.94SFR 220-361-017 $14.94SFR 220-361-018 $14.94SFR 220-361-019 $14.94SFR 220-361-020 $14.94SFR 220-361-021 $14.94SFR 220-361-023 $14.94SFR 220-361-034 $14.94SFR 220-361-035 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-371-001 $14.94SFR 220-371-002 $14.94SFR 220-371-003 $14.94SFR 220-371-004 $14.94SFR 220-371-005 $14.94SFR 220-371-006 $14.94SFR 220-371-007 $14.94SFR 220-371-008 $14.94SFR 220-371-009 $14.94SFR 220-371-010 $14.94SFR 220-371-011 $14.94SFR 220-371-012 $14.94SFR 220-371-013 $14.94SFR 220-371-014 $14.94SFR 220-371-015 $14.94SFR 220-371-016 $14.94SFR 220-371-017 $14.94SFR 220-371-018 $14.94SFR 220-371-019 $14.94SFR 220-371-020 $14.94SFR 220-371-021 $14.94SFR 220-371-022 $14.94SFR 220-371-023 $14.94SFR 220-371-024 $14.94SFR 220-371-025 $14.94SFR 220-371-026 $14.94SFR 220-371-027 $14.94SFR 220-371-028 $14.94SFR 220-371-029 $14.94SFR 220-371-030 $14.94SFR 220-371-031 $14.94SFR 220-371-032 $14.94SFR 220-371-033 $14.94SFR 220-371-034 $14.94SFR 220-371-035 $14.94SFR 220-371-036 $14.94SFR 220-371-037 $14.94SFR 220-371-038 $14.94SFR 220-371-039 $14.94SFR 220-371-040 $14.94SFR 220-371-041 $14.94SFR 220-371-042 $14.94SFR 220-371-043 $14.94SFR 220-371-044 $14.94SFR 220-371-045 $14.94SFR 220-371-046 $14.94SFR 220-371-047 $14.94SFR 220-371-048 $14.94SFR 220-371-049 $14.94SFR 220-371-050 $14.94SFR 220-371-051 $14.94SFR 220-371-052 $14.94SFR - 136 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-371-053 $14.94SFR 220-371-054 $14.94SFR 220-371-055 $14.94SFR 220-371-056 $14.94SFR 220-371-057 $14.94SFR 220-371-058 $14.94SFR 220-371-059 $14.94SFR 220-371-060 $14.94SFR 220-371-061 $14.94SFR 220-372-001 $14.94SFR 220-372-002 $14.94SFR 220-372-003 $14.94SFR 220-372-004 $14.94SFR 220-372-005 $14.94SFR 220-372-006 $14.94SFR 220-372-007 $14.94SFR 220-372-008 $14.94SFR 220-372-009 $14.94SFR 220-372-010 $14.94SFR 220-372-011 $14.94SFR 220-372-012 $14.94SFR 220-372-013 $14.94SFR 220-372-014 $14.94SFR 220-372-015 $14.94SFR 220-372-017 $14.94SFR 220-381-002 $14.94SFR 220-381-003 $14.94SFR 220-381-004 $14.94SFR 220-381-005 $14.94SFR 220-381-006 $14.94SFR 220-381-007 $14.94SFR 220-381-008 $14.94SFR 220-381-009 $14.94SFR 220-381-010 $14.94SFR 220-381-011 $14.94SFR 220-381-012 $14.94SFR 220-381-013 $14.94SFR 220-381-014 $14.94SFR 220-381-015 $14.94SFR 220-381-016 $14.94SFR 220-381-017 $14.94SFR 220-381-018 $14.94SFR 220-381-019 $14.94SFR 220-381-021 $14.94SFR 220-382-001 $14.94SFR 220-382-002 $14.94SFR 220-382-003 $14.94SFR 220-383-001 $14.94SFR 220-383-002 $14.94SFR 220-383-003 $14.94SFR 220-383-004 $14.94SFR 220-383-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-383-006 $14.94SFR 220-383-007 $14.94SFR 220-383-008 $14.94SFR 220-383-009 $14.94SFR 220-383-010 $14.94SFR 220-383-011 $14.94SFR 220-383-012 $14.94SFR 220-383-013 $14.94SFR 220-383-014 $14.94SFR 220-383-015 $14.94SFR 220-383-016 $14.94SFR 220-383-017 $14.94SFR 220-383-018 $14.94SFR 220-383-019 $14.94SFR 220-383-020 $14.94SFR 220-383-021 $14.94SFR 220-383-022 $14.94SFR 220-383-023 $14.94SFR 220-383-024 $14.94SFR 220-383-025 $14.94SFR 220-391-008 $14.94SFR 220-391-009 $14.94SFR 220-391-010 $14.94SFR 220-391-011 $14.94SFR 220-391-012 $14.94SFR 220-391-013 $14.94SFR 220-391-014 $14.94SFR 220-391-015 $14.94SFR 220-391-016 $14.94SFR 220-391-018 $14.94SFR 220-391-019 $14.94SFR 220-391-020 $14.94SFR 220-391-021 $14.94SFR 220-391-022 $14.94SFR 220-391-023 $14.94SFR 220-391-024 $14.94SFR 220-391-025 $14.94SFR 220-391-026 $14.94SFR 220-391-027 $14.94SFR 220-391-028 $14.94SFR 220-391-029 $14.94SFR 220-391-030 $14.94SFR 220-391-031 $14.94SFR 220-391-032 $14.94SFR 220-391-033 $14.94SFR 220-391-034 $14.94SFR 220-391-035 $14.94SFR 220-391-036 $14.94SFR 220-391-037 $14.94SFR 220-391-038 $14.94SFR 220-391-039 $14.94SFR 220-391-040 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-391-041 $14.94SFR 220-391-042 $14.94SFR 220-391-043 $14.94SFR 220-391-045 $14.94SFR 220-391-046 $14.94SFR 220-391-047 $14.94SFR 220-391-048 $14.94SFR 220-391-049 $14.94SFR 220-391-050 $14.94SFR 220-391-051 $14.94SFR 220-391-052 $14.94SFR 220-401-001 $14.94SFR 220-401-002 $14.94SFR 220-401-003 $14.94SFR 220-401-004 $14.94SFR 220-401-005 $14.94SFR 220-401-006 $14.94SFR 220-401-007 $14.94SFR 220-401-008 $14.94SFR 220-401-009 $14.94SFR 220-401-010 $14.94SFR 220-401-011 $14.94SFR 220-401-012 $14.94SFR 220-401-013 $14.94SFR 220-401-014 $14.94SFR 220-401-015 $14.94SFR 220-401-016 $14.94SFR 220-401-017 $14.94SFR 220-401-018 $14.94SFR 220-401-019 $14.94SFR 220-401-020 $14.94SFR 220-401-021 $14.94SFR 220-401-022 $14.94SFR 220-401-023 $14.94SFR 220-401-024 $14.94SFR 220-401-025 $14.94SFR 220-411-002 $14.94SFR 220-411-003 $14.94SFR 220-411-004 $14.94SFR 220-411-005 $14.94SFR 220-411-006 $14.94SFR 220-411-007 $14.94SFR 220-411-008 $14.94SFR 220-411-009 $14.94SFR 220-411-010 $14.94SFR 220-411-011 $14.94SFR 220-411-012 $14.94SFR 220-411-013 $14.94SFR 220-411-015 $14.94SFR 220-411-016 $14.94SFR 220-411-017 $14.94SFR 220-411-018 $14.94SFR - 137 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-411-019 $14.94SFR 220-411-023 $14.94SFR 220-411-025 $14.94SFR 220-421-001 $14.94SFR 220-421-002 $14.94SFR 220-421-003 $14.94SFR 220-421-004 $14.94SFR 220-421-005 $14.94SFR 220-421-006 $14.94SFR 220-421-007 $14.94SFR 220-421-008 $14.94SFR 220-421-009 $14.94SFR 220-421-010 $14.94SFR 220-421-011 $14.94SFR 220-421-012 $14.94SFR 220-421-013 $14.94SFR 220-421-014 $14.94SFR 220-421-015 $14.94SFR 220-421-016 $14.94SFR 220-421-017 $14.94SFR 220-421-018 $14.94SFR 220-421-019 $14.94SFR 220-421-020 $14.94SFR 220-421-021 $14.94SFR 220-421-022 $14.94SFR 220-421-023 $14.94SFR 220-421-024 $14.94SFR 220-421-025 $14.94SFR 220-421-026 $14.94SFR 220-421-027 $14.94SFR 220-421-028 $14.94SFR 220-421-029 $14.94SFR 220-421-030 $14.94SFR 220-421-031 $14.94SFR 220-421-032 $14.94SFR 220-421-033 $14.94SFR 220-421-034 $14.94SFR 220-421-035 $14.94SFR 220-421-036 $14.94SFR 220-421-037 $14.94SFR 220-421-038 $14.94SFR 220-421-039 $14.94SFR 220-421-040 $14.94SFR 220-421-041 $14.94SFR 220-431-007 $74.70COM 220-431-010 $74.70COM 220-431-011 $74.70COM 220-440-010 $14.94SFR 220-440-011 $14.94SFR 220-440-012 $14.94SFR 220-440-013 $14.94SFR 220-440-014 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-440-015 $14.94SFR 220-440-016 $14.94SFR 220-440-017 $14.94SFR 220-440-018 $14.94SFR 220-440-019 $14.94SFR 220-440-020 $14.94SFR 220-440-023 $14.94SFR 220-440-024 $14.94SFR 220-440-025 $14.94SFR 220-440-026 $14.94SFR 220-440-027 $14.94SFR 220-440-030 $14.94SFR 220-440-031 $14.94SFR 220-440-032 $14.94SFR 220-440-033 $14.94SFR 220-440-034 $14.94SFR 220-440-035 $14.94SFR 220-440-036 $14.94SFR 220-440-038 $14.94SFR 220-440-039 $14.94SFR 220-440-040 $14.94SFR 220-440-041 $14.94SFR 220-450-010 $14.94SFR 220-450-011 $14.94SFR 220-450-012 $14.94SFR 220-450-013 $14.94SFR 220-450-014 $14.94SFR 220-450-015 $14.94SFR 220-450-016 $14.94SFR 220-450-017 $14.94SFR 220-450-018 $14.94SFR 220-450-019 $14.94SFR 220-450-020 $14.94SFR 220-450-021 $14.94SFR 220-450-022 $14.94SFR 220-450-023 $14.94SFR 220-450-024 $14.94SFR 220-450-025 $14.94SFR 220-450-026 $14.94SFR 220-450-027 $14.94SFR 220-450-028 $14.94SFR 220-450-029 $14.94SFR 220-450-030 $14.94SFR 220-450-031 $14.94SFR 220-450-032 $14.94SFR 220-450-033 $14.94SFR 220-450-034 $14.94SFR 220-450-035 $14.94SFR 220-450-036 $14.94SFR 220-450-037 $14.94SFR 220-450-038 $14.94SFR 220-450-039 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-450-040 $14.94SFR 220-450-041 $14.94SFR 220-450-042 $14.94SFR 220-450-043 $14.94SFR 220-450-044 $14.94SFR 220-450-045 $14.94SFR 220-450-046 $14.94SFR 220-450-047 $14.94SFR 220-450-048 $14.94SFR 220-450-049 $14.94SFR 220-450-050 $14.94SFR 220-450-051 $14.94SFR 220-460-028 $14.94SFR 220-460-029 $14.94SFR 220-460-030 $14.94SFR 220-460-031 $14.94SFR 220-460-032 $14.94SFR 220-460-033 $14.94SFR 220-460-034 $14.94SFR 220-460-035 $14.94SFR 220-460-036 $14.94SFR 220-460-037 $14.94SFR 220-460-038 $14.94SFR 220-460-039 $14.94SFR 220-460-040 $14.94SFR 220-460-041 $14.94SFR 220-460-042 $14.94SFR 220-460-043 $14.94SFR 220-460-044 $14.94SFR 220-460-045 $14.94SFR 220-460-046 $14.94SFR 220-460-047 $14.94SFR 220-460-048 $14.94SFR 220-460-049 $14.94SFR 220-460-050 $14.94SFR 220-460-051 $14.94SFR 220-460-052 $14.94SFR 220-460-053 $14.94SFR 220-460-054 $14.94SFR 220-460-055 $14.94SFR 220-460-056 $14.94SFR 220-460-057 $14.94SFR 220-460-058 $14.94SFR 220-460-059 $14.94SFR 220-460-060 $14.94SFR 220-460-061 $14.94SFR 220-460-062 $14.94SFR 220-460-063 $14.94SFR 220-460-064 $14.94SFR 220-460-065 $14.94SFR 220-460-066 $14.94SFR 220-481-008 $74.70COM - 138 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-481-032 $74.70COM 220-491-001 $14.94SFR 220-491-002 $14.94SFR 220-491-003 $14.94SFR 220-491-004 $14.94SFR 220-491-005 $14.94SFR 220-491-006 $14.94SFR 220-491-007 $14.94SFR 220-491-008 $14.94SFR 220-491-009 $14.94SFR 220-491-010 $14.94SFR 220-491-011 $14.94SFR 220-491-012 $14.94SFR 220-491-013 $14.94SFR 220-491-015 $14.94SFR 220-491-016 $14.94SFR 220-491-017 $14.94SFR 220-491-018 $14.94SFR 220-491-019 $14.94SFR 220-491-020 $14.94SFR 220-491-021 $14.94SFR 220-491-022 $14.94SFR 220-491-023 $14.94SFR 220-491-025 $14.94SFR 220-491-026 $14.94SFR 220-491-027 $14.94SFR 220-491-028 $14.94SFR 220-491-029 $14.94SFR 220-491-030 $14.94SFR 220-491-031 $14.94SFR 220-491-032 $14.94SFR 220-491-033 $14.94SFR 220-491-034 $14.94SFR 220-491-035 $14.94SFR 220-491-036 $14.94SFR 220-491-037 $14.94SFR 220-491-038 $14.94SFR 220-491-039 $14.94SFR 220-491-040 $14.94SFR 220-491-041 $14.94SFR 220-491-042 $14.94SFR 220-491-043 $14.94SFR 220-491-046 $14.94SFR 220-491-047 $14.94SFR 220-491-048 $14.94SFR 220-501-001 $14.94SFR 220-501-002 $14.94SFR 220-501-003 $14.94SFR 220-501-004 $14.94SFR 220-501-005 $14.94SFR 220-501-006 $14.94SFR 220-501-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-501-010 $14.94SFR 220-501-011 $14.94SFR 220-501-012 $14.94SFR 220-501-013 $14.94SFR 220-501-014 $14.94SFR 220-501-015 $14.94SFR 220-501-016 $14.94SFR 220-501-017 $14.94SFR 220-501-018 $14.94SFR 220-501-019 $14.94SFR 220-501-020 $14.94SFR 220-501-021 $14.94SFR 220-501-022 $14.94SFR 220-501-023 $14.94SFR 220-501-024 $14.94SFR 220-501-026 $14.94SFR 220-501-027 $14.94SFR 220-511-001 $14.94SFR 220-511-002 $14.94SFR 220-511-003 $14.94SFR 220-511-004 $14.94SFR 220-511-005 $14.94SFR 220-511-006 $14.94SFR 220-511-007 $14.94SFR 220-511-011 $14.94SFR 220-511-012 $14.94SFR 220-511-013 $14.94SFR 220-511-014 $14.94SFR 220-511-015 $14.94SFR 220-511-016 $14.94SFR 220-511-017 $14.94SFR 220-511-018 $14.94SFR 220-511-019 $14.94SFR 220-511-021 $14.94SFR 220-511-022 $14.94SFR 220-511-023 $14.94SFR 220-521-001 $14.94SFR 220-521-002 $14.94SFR 220-521-003 $14.94SFR 220-521-004 $14.94SFR 220-521-005 $14.94SFR 220-521-012 $14.94SFR 220-521-013 $14.94SFR 220-521-014 $14.94SFR 220-521-017 $14.94SFR 220-521-018 $14.94SFR 220-521-019 $14.94SFR 220-521-020 $14.94SFR 220-521-021 $14.94SFR 220-521-023 $14.94SFR 220-521-024 $14.94SFR 220-521-025 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-521-026 $14.94SFR 220-521-027 $14.94SFR 220-521-029 $14.94SFR 220-521-030 $14.94SFR 220-521-031 $14.94SFR 220-531-001 $14.94SFR 220-531-002 $14.94SFR 220-531-003 $14.94SFR 220-531-004 $14.94SFR 220-531-005 $14.94SFR 220-531-006 $14.94SFR 220-531-007 $14.94SFR 220-531-008 $14.94SFR 220-531-009 $14.94SFR 220-531-010 $14.94SFR 220-531-015 $14.94SFR 220-531-016 $14.94SFR 220-531-017 $14.94SFR 220-531-020 $14.94SFR 220-531-021 $14.94SFR 220-531-023 $14.94SFR 220-531-024 $14.94SFR 220-541-001 $14.94SFR 220-541-002 $14.94SFR 220-541-003 $14.94SFR 220-541-004 $14.94SFR 220-541-005 $14.94SFR 220-541-006 $14.94SFR 220-541-007 $14.94SFR 220-541-008 $14.94SFR 220-541-009 $14.94SFR 220-541-010 $14.94SFR 220-541-011 $14.94SFR 220-541-012 $14.94SFR 220-541-013 $14.94SFR 220-541-014 $14.94SFR 220-541-015 $14.94SFR 220-541-016 $14.94SFR 220-541-017 $14.94SFR 220-541-018 $14.94SFR 220-541-019 $14.94SFR 220-541-020 $14.94SFR 220-541-021 $14.94SFR 220-541-024 $14.94SFR 220-551-001 $14.94SFR 220-551-002 $14.94SFR 220-551-003 $14.94SFR 220-551-004 $14.94SFR 220-551-005 $14.94SFR 220-551-006 $14.94SFR 220-551-007 $14.94SFR 220-551-008 $14.94SFR - 139 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-551-011 $14.94SFR 220-551-012 $14.94SFR 220-551-013 $14.94SFR 220-551-014 $14.94SFR 220-551-015 $14.94SFR 220-551-016 $14.94SFR 220-551-017 $14.94SFR 220-551-018 $14.94SFR 220-551-019 $14.94SFR 220-551-020 $14.94SFR 220-551-021 $14.94SFR 220-551-024 $14.94SFR 220-551-025 $7.46VSFR 220-561-001 $14.94SFR 220-561-002 $14.94SFR 220-561-003 $14.94SFR 220-561-004 $14.94SFR 220-561-005 $14.94SFR 220-561-006 $14.94SFR 220-561-007 $14.94SFR 220-561-008 $14.94SFR 220-561-009 $14.94SFR 220-561-010 $14.94SFR 220-561-011 $14.94SFR 220-571-004 $14.94SFR 220-571-005 $14.94SFR 220-571-006 $14.94SFR 220-571-008 $14.94SFR 220-571-009 $14.94SFR 220-571-010 $14.94SFR 220-571-011 $14.94SFR 220-571-014 $14.94SFR 220-571-015 $14.94SFR 220-571-016 $14.94SFR 220-571-017 $14.94SFR 220-571-018 $14.94SFR 220-571-019 $14.94SFR 220-571-020 $14.94SFR 220-571-021 $14.94SFR 220-571-029 $14.94SFR 220-571-030 $14.94SFR 220-571-031 $14.94SFR 220-571-032 $14.94SFR 220-571-034 $14.94SFR 220-571-036 $14.94SFR 220-571-038 $14.94SFR 220-571-039 $14.94SFR 220-580-002 $14.94SFR 220-580-003 $14.94SFR 220-580-004 $14.94SFR 220-580-005 $14.94SFR 220-580-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-580-007 $14.94SFR 220-580-008 $14.94SFR 220-580-009 $14.94SFR 220-580-010 $14.94SFR 220-580-011 $14.94SFR 220-580-012 $14.94SFR 220-580-013 $7.46CONDO 220-580-014 $7.46CONDO 220-580-015 $7.46CONDO 220-580-016 $7.46CONDO 220-580-017 $7.46CONDO 220-580-018 $7.46CONDO 220-580-019 $7.46CONDO 220-580-020 $7.46CONDO 220-580-021 $7.46CONDO 220-580-022 $7.46CONDO 220-580-023 $7.46CONDO 220-580-024 $7.46CONDO 220-580-025 $7.46CONDO 220-580-026 $7.46CONDO 220-580-027 $7.46CONDO 220-580-028 $7.46CONDO 220-580-029 $7.46CONDO 220-580-030 $7.46CONDO 220-580-031 $7.46CONDO 220-580-032 $7.46CONDO 220-580-036 $14.94SFR 220-600-001 $14.94SFR 220-600-002 $14.94SFR 220-600-003 $14.94SFR 220-600-004 $14.94SFR 220-600-005 $14.94SFR 220-600-006 $14.94SFR 220-600-007 $14.94SFR 220-600-008 $14.94SFR 220-600-009 $14.94SFR 220-600-010 $14.94SFR 220-600-011 $14.94SFR 220-600-012 $14.94SFR 220-600-013 $14.94SFR 220-600-014 $14.94SFR 220-600-015 $14.94SFR 220-600-016 $14.94SFR 220-600-017 $14.94SFR 220-600-018 $14.94SFR 220-600-019 $14.94SFR 220-600-020 $14.94SFR 220-610-001 $14.94SFR 220-610-002 $14.94SFR 220-610-003 $14.94SFR 220-610-004 $14.94SFR 220-610-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-610-006 $14.94SFR 220-610-007 $14.94SFR 220-610-008 $14.94SFR 220-610-009 $14.94SFR 220-610-010 $14.94SFR 220-610-011 $14.94SFR 220-610-013 $14.94SFR 220-610-014 $14.94SFR 220-610-015 $14.94SFR 220-610-016 $14.94SFR 220-610-017 $14.94SFR 220-610-018 $14.94SFR 220-610-019 $14.94SFR 220-610-020 $14.94SFR 220-610-021 $14.94SFR 220-610-022 $14.94SFR 220-610-023 $14.94SFR 220-610-024 $14.94SFR 220-610-025 $14.94SFR 220-620-001 $14.94SFR 220-620-002 $14.94SFR 220-620-003 $14.94SFR 220-620-004 $14.94SFR 220-620-005 $14.94SFR 220-620-006 $14.94SFR 220-620-007 $14.94SFR 220-620-008 $14.94SFR 220-620-009 $14.94SFR 220-620-010 $14.94SFR 220-620-011 $14.94SFR 220-620-012 $14.94SFR 220-620-013 $14.94SFR 220-620-014 $14.94SFR 220-620-015 $14.94SFR 220-620-016 $14.94SFR 220-620-017 $14.94SFR 220-620-018 $14.94SFR 220-620-019 $14.94SFR 220-620-020 $14.94SFR 220-620-021 $14.94SFR 220-620-022 $14.94SFR 220-620-023 $14.94SFR 220-620-024 $14.94SFR 220-620-025 $14.94SFR 220-620-026 $14.94SFR 220-620-027 $14.94SFR 220-620-028 $14.94SFR 220-620-029 $14.94SFR 220-620-030 $14.94SFR 220-620-031 $14.94SFR 220-620-032 $14.94SFR 220-620-033 $14.94SFR - 140 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-620-034 $14.94SFR 220-620-035 $14.94SFR 220-620-036 $14.94SFR 220-620-037 $14.94SFR 220-620-038 $14.94SFR 220-630-001 $74.70COM 220-640-001 $14.94SFR 220-640-002 $14.94SFR 220-640-003 $14.94SFR 220-640-004 $14.94SFR 220-640-005 $14.94SFR 220-640-006 $14.94SFR 220-640-007 $14.94SFR 220-640-008 $14.94SFR 220-640-009 $14.94SFR 220-640-010 $14.94SFR 220-640-011 $14.94SFR 220-640-012 $14.94SFR 220-640-013 $14.94SFR 220-640-014 $14.94SFR 220-640-015 $14.94SFR 220-640-016 $14.94SFR 220-640-017 $14.94SFR 220-640-018 $14.94SFR 220-640-019 $14.94SFR 220-650-001 $14.94SFR 220-650-007 $14.94SFR 220-650-008 $14.94SFR 220-650-009 $14.94SFR 220-650-010 $14.94SFR 220-650-011 $14.94SFR 220-650-012 $14.94SFR 220-650-013 $14.94SFR 220-650-014 $14.94SFR 220-650-015 $14.94SFR 220-650-016 $14.94SFR 220-650-018 $14.94SFR 220-650-022 $14.94SFR 220-650-023 $14.94SFR 220-650-024 $14.94SFR 220-650-027 $14.94SFR 220-650-028 $14.94SFR 220-650-034 $14.94SFR 220-660-002 $14.94SFR 220-660-004 $14.94SFR 220-660-005 $7.46CONDO 220-660-006 $7.46CONDO 220-660-007 $7.46CONDO 220-660-008 $7.46CONDO 220-660-009 $7.46CONDO 220-660-010 $7.46CONDO 220-660-011 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-660-012 $7.46CONDO 220-660-013 $7.46CONDO 220-660-014 $7.46CONDO 220-660-015 $7.46CONDO 220-660-016 $7.46CONDO 220-660-017 $7.46CONDO 220-660-018 $7.46CONDO 220-660-019 $7.46CONDO 220-660-020 $7.46CONDO 220-660-021 $7.46CONDO 220-660-022 $7.46CONDO 220-660-023 $7.46CONDO 220-660-024 $7.46CONDO 220-660-025 $7.46CONDO 220-660-026 $7.46CONDO 220-660-027 $7.46CONDO 220-660-028 $7.46CONDO 220-660-029 $7.46CONDO 220-660-030 $7.46CONDO 220-660-031 $7.46CONDO 220-660-032 $7.46CONDO 220-660-033 $7.46CONDO 220-660-034 $7.46CONDO 220-660-035 $7.46CONDO 220-660-036 $7.46CONDO 220-660-037 $7.46CONDO 220-660-038 $7.46CONDO 220-660-039 $7.46CONDO 220-660-040 $7.46CONDO 220-660-041 $7.46CONDO 220-660-042 $7.46CONDO 220-660-043 $7.46CONDO 220-660-044 $7.46CONDO 220-660-045 $7.46CONDO 220-660-046 $7.46CONDO 220-660-047 $7.46CONDO 220-660-048 $7.46CONDO 220-660-049 $7.46CONDO 220-660-050 $7.46CONDO 220-660-051 $7.46CONDO 220-660-052 $7.46CONDO 220-660-053 $7.46CONDO 220-660-054 $7.46CONDO 220-660-055 $7.46CONDO 220-660-056 $7.46CONDO 220-660-057 $7.46CONDO 220-660-058 $7.46CONDO 220-660-063 $14.94SFR 220-660-064 $14.94SFR 220-670-001 $14.94SFR 220-670-002 $14.94SFR 220-670-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-670-004 $14.94SFR 220-670-005 $14.94SFR 220-670-006 $14.94SFR 220-670-007 $14.94SFR 220-670-008 $14.94SFR 220-670-009 $14.94SFR 220-670-010 $14.94SFR 220-670-011 $14.94SFR 220-670-012 $14.94SFR 220-670-013 $14.94SFR 220-670-014 $14.94SFR 220-670-015 $14.94SFR 220-670-016 $14.94SFR 220-670-017 $14.94SFR 220-670-018 $14.94SFR 220-670-019 $14.94SFR 220-670-020 $14.94SFR 220-670-021 $14.94SFR 220-670-025 $14.94SFR 220-670-026 $14.94SFR 220-670-027 $14.94SFR 220-670-028 $14.94SFR 220-670-029 $14.94SFR 220-670-030 $14.94SFR 220-670-031 $14.94SFR 220-670-032 $14.94SFR 220-670-033 $14.94SFR 220-670-034 $14.94SFR 220-670-035 $14.94SFR 220-670-036 $14.94SFR 220-670-037 $14.94SFR 220-670-038 $14.94SFR 220-670-044 $14.94SFR 220-670-046 $14.94SFR 220-670-047 $14.94SFR 220-680-002 $14.94SFR 220-680-004 $14.94SFR 220-680-005 $14.94SFR 220-680-006 $14.94SFR 220-680-008 $14.94SFR 220-680-009 $14.94SFR 220-690-005 $14.94SFR 220-690-006 $14.94SFR 220-690-009 $14.94SFR 220-690-010 $14.94SFR 220-690-011 $14.94SFR 220-690-012 $14.94SFR 220-690-013 $14.94SFR 220-700-002 $14.94SFR 220-700-003 $14.94SFR 220-700-004 $14.94SFR 220-700-006 $14.94SFR - 141 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-710-001 $7.46CONDO 220-710-002 $7.46CONDO 220-710-003 $7.46CONDO 220-710-004 $7.46CONDO 220-710-005 $7.46CONDO 220-710-006 $7.46CONDO 220-710-007 $7.46CONDO 220-710-008 $7.46CONDO 220-710-009 $7.46CONDO 220-710-010 $7.46CONDO 220-710-011 $7.46CONDO 220-710-012 $7.46CONDO 220-710-013 $7.46CONDO 220-710-014 $7.46CONDO 220-710-015 $7.46CONDO 220-710-016 $7.46CONDO 220-710-017 $7.46CONDO 220-710-018 $7.46CONDO 220-710-019 $7.46CONDO 220-710-020 $7.46CONDO 220-710-021 $7.46CONDO 220-710-022 $7.46CONDO 220-710-023 $7.46CONDO 220-710-024 $7.46CONDO 220-721-001 $14.94SFR 220-721-002 $14.94SFR 220-722-001 $14.94SFR 220-722-002 $14.94SFR 220-722-003 $14.94SFR 220-722-004 $14.94SFR 220-722-005 $14.94SFR 220-722-006 $14.94SFR 220-722-007 $14.94SFR 220-722-008 $14.94SFR 220-722-009 $14.94SFR 220-722-010 $14.94SFR 220-722-011 $14.94SFR 220-722-012 $14.94SFR 220-722-013 $14.94SFR 220-722-014 $14.94SFR 220-722-015 $14.94SFR 220-722-016 $14.94SFR 220-722-017 $14.94SFR 220-722-018 $14.94SFR 220-722-019 $14.94SFR 220-722-020 $14.94SFR 220-722-021 $14.94SFR 220-722-022 $14.94SFR 220-722-023 $14.94SFR 220-722-024 $14.94SFR 220-723-001 $14.94SFR 220-723-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-723-003 $14.94SFR 220-723-004 $14.94SFR 220-723-005 $14.94SFR 220-723-006 $14.94SFR 220-723-007 $14.94SFR 220-723-008 $14.94SFR 220-723-009 $14.94SFR 220-723-010 $14.94SFR 220-723-011 $14.94SFR 220-723-012 $14.94SFR 220-723-013 $14.94SFR 220-723-014 $14.94SFR 220-724-003 $14.94SFR 220-724-004 $14.94SFR 220-724-005 $14.94SFR 220-724-006 $14.94SFR 220-724-007 $14.94SFR 220-725-001 $14.94SFR 220-725-002 $14.94SFR 220-725-003 $14.94SFR 220-725-004 $14.94SFR 220-725-005 $14.94SFR 220-725-006 $14.94SFR 220-725-007 $14.94SFR 220-725-008 $14.94SFR 220-725-009 $14.94SFR 220-725-010 $14.94SFR 220-725-011 $14.94SFR 220-725-012 $14.94SFR 220-725-013 $14.94SFR 220-725-014 $14.94SFR 220-725-015 $14.94SFR 220-725-016 $14.94SFR 220-725-017 $14.94SFR 220-725-018 $14.94SFR 220-725-019 $14.94SFR 220-725-020 $14.94SFR 220-725-021 $14.94SFR 220-725-022 $14.94SFR 220-725-023 $14.94SFR 220-725-024 $14.94SFR 220-725-025 $14.94SFR 220-725-026 $14.94SFR 220-725-027 $14.94SFR 220-725-028 $14.94SFR 220-725-029 $14.94SFR 220-725-030 $14.94SFR 220-725-031 $14.94SFR 220-725-032 $14.94SFR 220-725-033 $14.94SFR 220-725-034 $14.94SFR 220-725-035 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-726-001 $14.94SFR 220-726-002 $14.94SFR 220-726-003 $14.94SFR 220-726-004 $14.94SFR 220-726-005 $14.94SFR 220-726-006 $14.94SFR 220-731-001 $14.94SFR 220-731-002 $14.94SFR 220-731-003 $14.94SFR 220-732-001 $14.94SFR 220-732-002 $14.94SFR 220-732-003 $14.94SFR 220-732-004 $14.94SFR 220-732-005 $14.94SFR 220-732-006 $14.94SFR 220-732-007 $14.94SFR 220-732-008 $14.94SFR 220-732-009 $14.94SFR 220-732-010 $14.94SFR 220-732-011 $14.94SFR 220-732-012 $14.94SFR 220-732-013 $14.94SFR 220-732-014 $14.94SFR 220-732-015 $14.94SFR 220-732-016 $14.94SFR 220-732-017 $14.94SFR 220-732-018 $14.94SFR 220-733-001 $14.94SFR 220-733-002 $14.94SFR 220-733-003 $14.94SFR 220-733-004 $14.94SFR 220-733-005 $14.94SFR 220-734-001 $14.94SFR 220-734-002 $14.94SFR 220-734-003 $14.94SFR 220-734-004 $14.94SFR 220-734-005 $14.94SFR 220-734-006 $14.94SFR 220-734-007 $14.94SFR 220-734-008 $14.94SFR 220-734-009 $14.94SFR 220-734-010 $14.94SFR 220-734-011 $14.94SFR 220-734-012 $14.94SFR 220-734-013 $14.94SFR 220-734-014 $14.94SFR 220-734-015 $14.94SFR 220-734-016 $14.94SFR 220-734-017 $14.94SFR 220-734-018 $14.94SFR 220-735-001 $14.94SFR 220-735-002 $14.94SFR - 142 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-735-003 $14.94SFR 220-735-004 $14.94SFR 220-735-005 $14.94SFR 220-735-006 $14.94SFR 220-736-001 $14.94SFR 220-736-002 $14.94SFR 220-736-003 $14.94SFR 220-736-004 $14.94SFR 220-736-005 $14.94SFR 220-737-001 $14.94SFR 220-737-002 $14.94SFR 220-737-003 $14.94SFR 220-737-004 $14.94SFR 220-737-005 $14.94SFR 220-737-006 $14.94SFR 220-738-001 $14.94SFR 220-738-002 $14.94SFR 220-738-003 $14.94SFR 220-738-004 $14.94SFR 220-739-001 $14.94SFR 220-739-002 $14.94SFR 220-739-003 $14.94SFR 220-739-004 $14.94SFR 220-741-001 $14.94SFR 220-741-002 $14.94SFR 220-741-003 $14.94SFR 220-741-004 $14.94SFR 220-741-005 $14.94SFR 220-741-006 $14.94SFR 220-741-007 $14.94SFR 220-741-008 $14.94SFR 220-741-011 $14.94SFR 220-741-012 $14.94SFR 220-741-013 $14.94SFR 220-741-014 $14.94SFR 220-741-015 $14.94SFR 220-741-016 $14.94SFR 220-741-017 $14.94SFR 220-741-018 $14.94SFR 220-741-019 $14.94SFR 220-741-020 $14.94SFR 220-741-021 $14.94SFR 220-741-022 $14.94SFR 220-741-023 $14.94SFR 220-741-024 $14.94SFR 220-741-025 $14.94SFR 220-741-026 $14.94SFR 220-741-027 $14.94SFR 220-741-028 $14.94SFR 220-741-029 $14.94SFR 220-741-030 $14.94SFR 220-741-031 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-741-032 $14.94SFR 220-741-033 $14.94SFR 220-741-034 $14.94SFR 220-741-035 $14.94SFR 220-741-036 $14.94SFR 220-741-037 $14.94SFR 220-741-038 $14.94SFR 220-741-039 $14.94SFR 220-741-040 $14.94SFR 220-741-041 $14.94SFR 220-741-042 $14.94SFR 220-741-043 $14.94SFR 220-741-044 $14.94SFR 220-741-045 $14.94SFR 220-741-046 $14.94SFR 220-741-047 $14.94SFR 220-741-054 $14.94SFR 220-741-056 $14.94SFR 220-741-057 $14.94SFR 220-741-058 $14.94SFR 220-741-059 $14.94SFR 220-741-060 $14.94SFR 220-741-061 $14.94SFR 220-741-062 $14.94SFR 220-741-063 $14.94SFR 220-742-001 $14.94SFR 220-742-002 $14.94SFR 220-742-003 $14.94SFR 220-742-004 $14.94SFR 220-742-005 $14.94SFR 220-742-006 $14.94SFR 220-742-007 $14.94SFR 220-742-008 $14.94SFR 220-742-009 $14.94SFR 220-742-010 $14.94SFR 220-742-011 $14.94SFR 220-742-012 $14.94SFR 220-742-013 $14.94SFR 220-742-014 $14.94SFR 220-742-015 $14.94SFR 220-742-016 $14.94SFR 220-742-017 $14.94SFR 220-742-018 $14.94SFR 220-742-019 $14.94SFR 220-750-001 $14.94SFR 220-750-002 $14.94SFR 220-750-003 $14.94SFR 220-750-004 $14.94SFR 220-750-005 $14.94SFR 220-750-006 $14.94SFR 220-750-007 $14.94SFR 220-750-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-750-009 $14.94SFR 220-750-010 $14.94SFR 220-750-011 $14.94SFR 220-750-012 $14.94SFR 220-750-013 $14.94SFR 220-750-014 $14.94SFR 220-750-015 $14.94SFR 220-750-016 $14.94SFR 220-750-017 $14.94SFR 220-750-018 $14.94SFR 220-750-019 $14.94SFR 220-750-020 $14.94SFR 220-750-021 $14.94SFR 220-750-022 $14.94SFR 220-750-023 $14.94SFR 220-750-024 $14.94SFR 220-750-025 $14.94SFR 220-750-026 $14.94SFR 220-750-027 $14.94SFR 220-750-028 $14.94SFR 220-750-029 $14.94SFR 220-750-030 $14.94SFR 220-750-031 $14.94SFR 220-750-032 $14.94SFR 220-750-033 $14.94SFR 220-750-034 $14.94SFR 220-750-035 $14.94SFR 220-750-036 $14.94SFR 220-750-037 $14.94SFR 220-750-038 $14.94SFR 220-750-039 $14.94SFR 220-750-040 $14.94SFR 220-750-041 $14.94SFR 220-750-042 $14.94SFR 220-750-043 $14.94SFR 220-750-044 $14.94SFR 220-750-045 $14.94SFR 220-750-046 $14.94SFR 220-750-047 $14.94SFR 220-750-048 $14.94SFR 220-750-049 $14.94SFR 220-750-050 $14.94SFR 220-750-051 $14.94SFR 220-750-052 $14.94SFR 220-760-001 $14.94SFR 220-760-002 $14.94SFR 220-760-003 $14.94SFR 220-760-004 $14.94SFR 220-760-005 $14.94SFR 220-760-006 $14.94SFR 220-760-007 $14.94SFR 220-760-008 $14.94SFR - 143 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-760-009 $14.94SFR 220-760-010 $14.94SFR 220-760-011 $14.94SFR 220-760-012 $14.94SFR 220-760-013 $14.94SFR 220-760-014 $14.94SFR 220-760-015 $14.94SFR 220-760-016 $14.94SFR 220-760-017 $14.94SFR 220-760-018 $14.94SFR 220-760-019 $14.94SFR 220-760-020 $14.94SFR 220-760-021 $14.94SFR 220-760-022 $14.94SFR 220-760-023 $14.94SFR 220-760-024 $14.94SFR 220-760-025 $14.94SFR 220-760-026 $14.94SFR 220-760-027 $14.94SFR 220-760-028 $14.94SFR 220-760-029 $14.94SFR 220-760-030 $14.94SFR 220-760-031 $14.94SFR 220-760-032 $14.94SFR 220-770-001 $14.94SFR 220-770-002 $14.94SFR 220-770-003 $14.94SFR 220-770-004 $14.94SFR 220-770-005 $14.94SFR 220-770-006 $14.94SFR 220-770-007 $14.94SFR 220-770-008 $14.94SFR 220-770-009 $14.94SFR 220-770-010 $14.94SFR 220-770-011 $14.94SFR 220-770-012 $14.94SFR 220-770-013 $14.94SFR 220-770-014 $14.94SFR 220-770-015 $14.94SFR 220-770-016 $14.94SFR 220-770-017 $14.94SFR 220-770-018 $14.94SFR 220-770-019 $14.94SFR 220-770-020 $14.94SFR 220-770-021 $14.94SFR 220-770-022 $14.94SFR 220-770-023 $14.94SFR 220-780-001 $14.94SFR 220-780-002 $14.94SFR 220-780-003 $14.94SFR 220-780-004 $14.94SFR 220-780-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-780-006 $14.94SFR 220-780-007 $14.94SFR 220-780-008 $14.94SFR 220-780-009 $14.94SFR 220-780-010 $14.94SFR 220-780-011 $14.94SFR 220-780-012 $14.94SFR 220-780-013 $14.94SFR 220-780-014 $14.94SFR 220-780-015 $14.94SFR 220-780-016 $14.94SFR 220-780-017 $14.94SFR 220-780-018 $14.94SFR 220-780-019 $14.94SFR 220-780-020 $14.94SFR 220-780-021 $14.94SFR 220-790-001 $14.94SFR 220-790-002 $14.94SFR 220-790-003 $14.94SFR 220-790-004 $14.94SFR 220-790-005 $14.94SFR 220-790-006 $14.94SFR 220-790-007 $14.94SFR 220-790-008 $14.94SFR 220-790-009 $14.94SFR 220-790-010 $14.94SFR 220-790-011 $14.94SFR 220-790-012 $14.94SFR 220-790-013 $14.94SFR 220-790-014 $14.94SFR 220-790-015 $14.94SFR 220-790-016 $14.94SFR 220-790-017 $14.94SFR 220-790-018 $14.94SFR 220-790-019 $14.94SFR 220-790-020 $14.94SFR 220-790-021 $14.94SFR 220-790-022 $14.94SFR 220-790-023 $14.94SFR 220-790-024 $14.94SFR 220-790-025 $14.94SFR 220-790-026 $14.94SFR 220-790-027 $14.94SFR 220-790-028 $14.94SFR 220-790-029 $14.94SFR 220-790-030 $14.94SFR 220-790-031 $14.94SFR 220-790-032 $14.94SFR 220-790-033 $14.94SFR 220-790-034 $14.94SFR 220-790-035 $14.94SFR 220-790-036 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-790-037 $14.94SFR 220-790-038 $14.94SFR 220-790-039 $14.94SFR 220-790-040 $14.94SFR 220-790-041 $14.94SFR 220-790-042 $14.94SFR 220-790-043 $14.94SFR 220-790-044 $14.94SFR 220-790-045 $14.94SFR 220-790-046 $14.94SFR 220-790-047 $14.94SFR 220-790-048 $14.94SFR 220-790-049 $14.94SFR 220-790-050 $14.94SFR 220-790-051 $14.94SFR 220-790-052 $14.94SFR 220-790-053 $14.94SFR 220-790-054 $14.94SFR 220-790-055 $14.94SFR 220-790-056 $14.94SFR 220-790-057 $14.94SFR 220-790-058 $14.94SFR 220-790-059 $14.94SFR 220-790-060 $14.94SFR 220-790-061 $14.94SFR 220-790-062 $14.94SFR 220-800-001 $14.94SFR 220-800-002 $14.94SFR 220-800-003 $14.94SFR 220-800-004 $14.94SFR 220-800-005 $14.94SFR 220-800-006 $14.94SFR 220-800-007 $14.94SFR 220-800-008 $14.94SFR 220-800-009 $14.94SFR 220-800-010 $14.94SFR 220-800-011 $14.94SFR 220-800-012 $14.94SFR 220-800-013 $14.94SFR 220-800-014 $14.94SFR 220-800-015 $14.94SFR 220-800-016 $14.94SFR 220-800-017 $14.94SFR 220-800-018 $14.94SFR 220-800-019 $14.94SFR 220-800-020 $14.94SFR 220-800-021 $14.94SFR 220-800-022 $14.94SFR 220-800-023 $14.94SFR 220-800-024 $14.94SFR 220-800-025 $14.94SFR 220-800-026 $14.94SFR - 144 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-800-027 $14.94SFR 220-800-028 $14.94SFR 220-800-029 $14.94SFR 220-800-030 $14.94SFR 220-800-031 $14.94SFR 220-800-032 $14.94SFR 220-800-033 $14.94SFR 220-800-034 $14.94SFR 220-800-035 $14.94SFR 220-800-036 $14.94SFR 220-800-037 $14.94SFR 220-810-001 $14.94SFR 220-810-002 $14.94SFR 220-810-003 $14.94SFR 220-810-004 $14.94SFR 220-810-005 $14.94SFR 220-810-006 $14.94SFR 220-810-007 $14.94SFR 220-810-008 $14.94SFR 220-810-009 $14.94SFR 220-810-010 $14.94SFR 220-810-011 $14.94SFR 220-810-012 $14.94SFR 220-810-013 $14.94SFR 220-810-014 $14.94SFR 220-810-015 $14.94SFR 220-810-016 $14.94SFR 220-810-017 $14.94SFR 220-810-018 $14.94SFR 220-810-019 $14.94SFR 220-810-020 $14.94SFR 220-810-021 $14.94SFR 220-810-022 $14.94SFR 220-810-023 $14.94SFR 220-820-001 $14.94SFR 220-820-002 $14.94SFR 220-820-003 $14.94SFR 220-820-004 $14.94SFR 220-820-005 $14.94SFR 220-820-006 $14.94SFR 220-820-007 $14.94SFR 220-820-008 $14.94SFR 220-820-009 $14.94SFR 220-820-010 $14.94SFR 220-820-011 $14.94SFR 220-820-012 $14.94SFR 220-820-013 $14.94SFR 220-820-014 $14.94SFR 220-820-015 $14.94SFR 220-820-016 $14.94SFR 220-820-017 $14.94SFR 220-820-018 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-820-019 $14.94SFR 220-820-020 $14.94SFR 220-820-021 $14.94SFR 220-820-022 $14.94SFR 220-820-023 $14.94SFR 220-820-024 $14.94SFR 220-820-025 $14.94SFR 220-820-026 $14.94SFR 220-820-027 $14.94SFR 220-820-028 $14.94SFR 220-820-029 $14.94SFR 220-820-030 $14.94SFR 220-820-031 $14.94SFR 220-820-032 $14.94SFR 220-820-033 $14.94SFR 220-820-034 $14.94SFR 220-820-035 $14.94SFR 220-820-036 $14.94SFR 220-820-037 $14.94SFR 220-820-038 $14.94SFR 220-820-039 $14.94SFR 220-820-042 $14.94SFR 220-820-043 $14.94SFR 220-820-044 $14.94SFR 220-820-045 $14.94SFR 220-820-046 $14.94SFR 220-820-047 $14.94SFR 220-820-048 $14.94SFR 220-820-049 $14.94SFR 220-820-050 $14.94SFR 220-820-051 $14.94SFR 220-820-052 $14.94SFR 220-820-053 $14.94SFR 220-820-054 $14.94SFR 220-820-055 $14.94SFR 220-820-056 $14.94SFR 220-820-057 $14.94SFR 220-820-058 $14.94SFR 220-820-059 $14.94SFR 220-820-060 $14.94SFR 220-820-061 $14.94SFR 220-820-062 $14.94SFR 220-820-063 $14.94SFR 220-820-069 $14.94SFR 220-820-070 $14.94SFR 220-830-001 $14.94SFR 220-830-002 $14.94SFR 220-830-003 $14.94SFR 220-830-004 $14.94SFR 220-830-005 $14.94SFR 220-830-006 $14.94SFR 220-830-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 220-830-008 $14.94SFR 220-830-009 $14.94SFR 220-830-010 $14.94SFR 220-830-011 $14.94SFR 220-830-012 $14.94SFR 220-830-013 $14.94SFR 220-830-014 $14.94SFR 220-830-015 $14.94SFR 220-830-016 $14.94SFR 220-830-017 $14.94SFR 220-830-018 $14.94SFR 220-830-019 $14.94SFR 220-830-020 $14.94SFR 220-830-021 $14.94SFR 220-830-022 $14.94SFR 220-830-023 $14.94SFR 220-830-024 $14.94SFR 220-830-025 $14.94SFR 220-830-026 $14.94SFR 220-830-027 $14.94SFR 220-830-028 $14.94SFR 220-830-029 $14.94SFR 220-830-030 $14.94SFR 220-830-031 $14.94SFR 220-830-032 $14.94SFR 220-830-033 $14.94SFR 220-830-034 $14.94SFR 220-830-035 $14.94SFR 220-830-036 $14.94SFR 220-840-001 $14.94SFR 220-840-002 $14.94SFR 220-840-003 $14.94SFR 220-840-004 $14.94SFR 220-840-005 $14.94SFR 220-840-006 $14.94SFR 220-840-007 $14.94SFR 220-840-008 $14.94SFR 220-840-009 $14.94SFR 220-840-010 $14.94SFR 220-840-011 $14.94SFR 220-840-012 $14.94SFR 258-500-006 $14.94SFR 258-500-007 $14.94SFR 258-500-008 $14.94SFR 258-500-009 $14.94SFR 258-500-010 $14.94SFR 258-500-011 $14.94SFR 258-500-012 $14.94SFR 258-500-013 $14.94SFR 258-500-014 $14.94SFR 258-500-015 $14.94SFR 258-500-016 $14.94SFR - 145 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 258-500-017 $14.94SFR 258-500-018 $14.94SFR 258-500-019 $14.94SFR 258-500-020 $14.94SFR 354-041-002 $14.94SFR 354-041-003 $14.94SFR 354-041-004 $14.94SFR 354-041-005 $14.94SFR 354-041-006 $29.88MFR2 354-041-007 $14.94SFR 354-041-008 $7.46VSFR 354-041-009 $7.46VSFR 354-041-010 $14.94SFR 354-041-011 $14.94SFR 354-041-012 $14.94SFR 354-041-014 $7.46VSFR 354-041-015 $14.94SFR 354-041-016 $7.46VSFR 354-041-017 $14.94SFR 354-041-019 $14.94SFR 354-041-021 $14.94SFR 354-041-022 $14.94SFR 354-041-023 $14.94SFR 354-041-024 $14.94SFR 354-041-025 $14.94SFR 354-041-026 $14.94SFR 354-041-027 $14.94SFR 354-041-028 $14.94SFR 354-041-029 $14.94SFR 354-041-030 $7.46VSFR 354-041-031 $14.94SFR 354-041-032 $14.94SFR 354-041-033 $14.94SFR 354-041-036 $7.46VSFR 354-041-037 $14.94SFR 354-041-038 $14.94SFR 354-042-001 $14.94SFR 354-042-002 $14.94SFR 354-042-003 $14.94SFR 354-042-005 $14.94SFR 354-042-006 $14.94SFR 354-042-007 $14.94SFR 354-042-008 $14.94SFR 354-042-009 $14.94SFR 354-042-010 $14.94SFR 354-042-011 $14.94SFR 354-042-012 $14.94SFR 354-042-013 $14.94SFR 354-042-014 $14.94SFR 354-042-015 $14.94SFR 354-042-016 $14.94SFR 354-042-017 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-042-018 $14.94SFR 354-042-019 $14.94SFR 354-042-020 $14.94SFR 354-042-021 $14.94SFR 354-042-022 $14.94SFR 354-042-023 $14.94SFR 354-042-024 $29.88MFR2 354-042-027 $14.94SFR 354-042-028 $14.94SFR 354-042-029 $7.46VSFR 354-042-031 $14.94SFR 354-043-001 $14.94SFR 354-043-002 $14.94SFR 354-043-003 $14.94SFR 354-043-004 $14.94SFR 354-043-005 $14.94SFR 354-043-006 $14.94SFR 354-043-007 $14.94SFR 354-043-008 $14.94SFR 354-043-009 $14.94SFR 354-043-010 $14.94SFR 354-043-011 $14.94SFR 354-043-012 $14.94SFR 354-043-013 $14.94SFR 354-043-014 $14.94SFR 354-043-015 $14.94SFR 354-043-016 $14.94SFR 354-043-017 $14.94SFR 354-043-018 $14.94SFR 354-043-019 $14.94SFR 354-043-020 $14.94SFR 354-043-021 $14.94SFR 354-043-022 $14.94SFR 354-043-023 $14.94SFR 354-043-024 $14.94SFR 354-043-025 $14.94SFR 354-044-001 $14.94SFR 354-044-002 $14.94SFR 354-044-003 $14.94SFR 354-044-004 $14.94SFR 354-044-005 $14.94SFR 354-044-006 $14.94SFR 354-044-007 $14.94SFR 354-044-009 $14.94SFR 354-044-010 $14.94SFR 354-051-001 $14.94SFR 354-051-002 $14.94SFR 354-051-003 $44.82MFR 354-051-004 $14.94SFR 354-051-005 $14.94SFR 354-051-006 $14.94SFR 354-051-007 $44.82MFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-051-008 $14.94SFR 354-051-009 $14.94SFR 354-051-010 $14.94SFR 354-051-011 $14.94SFR 354-051-012 $14.94SFR 354-051-013 $14.94SFR 354-051-014 $14.94SFR 354-051-015 $14.94SFR 354-051-016 $14.94SFR 354-052-002 $29.88MFR2 354-052-003 $14.94SFR 354-052-004 $14.94SFR 354-052-005 $14.94SFR 354-052-006 $29.88MFR2 354-052-007 $14.94SFR 354-052-008 $14.94SFR 354-052-009 $14.94SFR 354-052-010 $14.94SFR 354-052-011 $14.94SFR 354-052-012 $14.94SFR 354-052-013 $14.94SFR 354-052-014 $14.94SFR 354-053-001 $14.94SFR 354-053-002 $14.94SFR 354-053-003 $14.94SFR 354-053-004 $14.94SFR 354-053-005 $14.94SFR 354-053-006 $14.94SFR 354-053-007 $14.94SFR 354-053-008 $14.94SFR 354-053-009 $14.94SFR 354-053-010 $14.94SFR 354-053-011 $14.94SFR 354-053-012 $14.94SFR 354-053-013 $14.94SFR 354-053-017 $14.94SFR 354-053-018 $14.94SFR 354-053-019 $29.88MFR2 354-053-020 $14.94SFR 354-053-021 $29.88MFR2 354-053-022 $14.94SFR 354-053-023 $14.94SFR 354-053-024 $14.94SFR 354-053-025 $14.94SFR 354-053-026 $14.94SFR 354-054-001 $14.94SFR 354-054-002 $14.94SFR 354-054-003 $14.94SFR 354-054-004 $14.94SFR 354-054-005 $14.94SFR 354-054-006 $7.46VSFR 354-054-009 $14.94SFR - 146 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-054-010 $14.94SFR 354-054-011 $14.94SFR 354-054-012 $14.94SFR 354-054-014 $14.94SFR 354-054-015 $14.94SFR 354-054-016 $14.94SFR 354-054-017 $14.94SFR 354-054-018 $14.94SFR 354-054-019 $14.94SFR 354-054-020 $14.94SFR 354-054-021 $7.46VSFR 354-061-001 $14.94SFR 354-061-002 $14.94SFR 354-061-003 $44.82MFR 354-061-004 $29.88MFR2 354-061-005 $14.94SFR 354-061-009 $14.94SFR 354-061-010 $29.88MFR2 354-061-011 $14.94SFR 354-061-012 $14.94SFR 354-061-013 $14.94SFR 354-061-014 $44.82MFR 354-061-015 $14.94SFR 354-061-016 $14.94SFR 354-061-017 $14.94SFR 354-061-018 $29.88MFR2 354-061-019 $14.94SFR 354-061-020 $7.46VSFR 354-062-001 $44.82MFR 354-062-002 $29.88MFR2 354-062-007 $14.94SFR 354-062-008 $14.94SFR 354-063-001 $29.88MFR2 354-063-002 $14.94SFR 354-063-003 $14.94SFR 354-063-004 $29.88MFR2 354-063-005 $14.94SFR 354-063-006 $14.94SFR 354-063-007 $29.88MFR2 354-063-008 $14.94SFR 354-063-009 $14.94SFR 354-063-010 $14.94SFR 354-063-011 $29.88MFR2 354-063-012 $29.88MFR2 354-063-013 $14.94SFR 354-063-014 $29.88MFR2 354-063-015 $14.94SFR 354-063-018 $29.88MFR2 354-064-001 $14.94SFR 354-064-005 $14.94SFR 354-064-006 $14.94SFR 354-064-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-064-011 $29.88MFR2 354-064-012 $14.94SFR 354-064-013 $44.82MFR 354-064-015 $14.94SFR 354-064-016 $14.94SFR 354-064-018 $14.94SFR 354-064-019 $29.88MFR2 354-064-022 $14.94SFR 354-064-024 $14.94SFR 354-064-025 $7.46VMFR 354-064-026 $59.76MFR4 354-071-006 $74.70VIND 354-072-002 $74.70COM 354-072-003 $7.46VCOM 354-072-004 $74.70COM 354-072-006 $74.70INST 354-072-007 $14.94SFR 354-072-008 $44.82MFR 354-072-009 $29.88MFR2 354-072-013 $14.94SFR 354-072-015 $14.94SFR 354-072-017 $44.82MFR 354-072-018 $59.76MFR4 354-072-019 $59.76MFR4 354-072-020 $7.46VMFR 354-072-022 $44.82MFR 354-072-023 $14.94SFR 354-072-024 $59.76MFR4 354-072-025 $14.94SFR 354-072-026 $44.82MFR 354-072-027 $7.46VSFR 354-072-028 $14.94SFR 354-072-029 $44.82MFR 354-072-030 $29.88MFR2 354-072-031 $74.70COM 354-072-032 $14.94SFR 354-074-003 $14.94SFR 354-074-004 $14.94SFR 354-074-005 $29.88MFR2 354-074-006 $14.94SFR 354-074-007 $29.88MFR2 354-074-008 $14.94SFR 354-074-009 $14.94SFR 354-074-010 $29.88MFR2 354-074-011 $44.82MFR 354-074-012 $29.88MFR2 354-074-013 $14.94SFR 354-074-014 $14.94SFR 354-074-015 $59.76MFR4 354-074-016 $14.94SFR 354-074-017 $44.82MFR 354-074-018 $44.82MFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-074-019 $14.94SFR 354-074-020 $14.94SFR 354-074-021 $29.88MFR2 354-074-022 $14.94SFR 354-075-001 $14.94SFR 354-075-002 $29.88MFR2 354-075-003 $14.94SFR 354-075-004 $29.88MFR2 354-075-005 $14.94SFR 354-075-006 $29.88MFR2 354-075-007 $29.88MFR2 354-075-008 $14.94SFR 354-075-009 $74.70MFR5 354-075-010 $14.94SFR 354-075-011 $29.88MFR2 354-075-014 $14.94SFR 354-075-015 $29.88MFR2 354-075-016 $29.88MFR2 354-075-017 $14.94SFR 354-075-018 $44.82MFR 354-075-019 $29.88MFR2 354-075-020 $14.94SFR 354-080-001 $74.70IND 354-080-008 $14.94SFR 354-080-010 $74.70IND 354-080-011 $74.70VIND 354-091-002 $74.70VIND 354-091-010 $74.70IND 354-091-011 $29.88MFR2 354-092-001 $74.70COM 354-092-002 $74.70COM 354-092-003 $74.70COM 354-092-004 $74.70COM 354-092-006 $14.94SFR 354-092-007 $14.94SFR 354-092-008 $14.94SFR 354-092-009 $14.94SFR 354-092-010 $14.94SFR 354-092-011 $14.94SFR 354-093-001 $29.88MFR2 354-093-002 $14.94SFR 354-093-003 $14.94SFR 354-093-004 $14.94SFR 354-093-005 $14.94SFR 354-093-006 $44.82MFR 354-093-007 $14.94SFR 354-093-008 $59.76MFR4 354-093-009 $29.88MFR2 354-093-010 $14.94SFR 354-093-011 $29.88MFR2 354-093-012 $29.88MFR2 354-093-013 $29.88MFR2 - 147 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-094-001 $74.70COM 354-094-002 $74.70COM 354-094-004 $74.70COM 354-094-009 $7.46VCOM 354-094-010 $74.70COM 354-094-011 $89.64MFR6 354-094-012 $29.88MFR2 354-094-013 $29.88MFR2 354-094-014 $7.46VCOM 354-094-015 $29.88MFR2 354-094-016 $29.88MFR2 354-095-001 $14.94SFR 354-095-002 $14.94SFR 354-095-003 $14.94SFR 354-095-004 $14.94SFR 354-095-010 $14.94SFR 354-095-011 $14.94SFR 354-095-013 $14.94SFR 354-095-014 $14.94SFR 354-095-016 $14.94SFR 354-095-017 $14.94SFR 354-095-018 $14.94SFR 354-095-019 $14.94SFR 354-095-020 $14.94SFR 354-095-021 $14.94SFR 354-095-022 $14.94SFR 354-095-024 $7.46VSFR 354-095-025 $14.94SFR 354-101-001 $44.82MFR 354-101-002 $14.94SFR 354-101-003 $14.94SFR 354-101-004 $14.94SFR 354-101-005 $14.94SFR 354-101-006 $29.88MFR2 354-101-007 $14.94SFR 354-101-008 $59.76MFR4 354-101-009 $14.94SFR 354-101-010 $29.88MFR2 354-101-011 $29.88MFR2 354-101-012 $44.82MFR 354-101-013 $14.94SFR 354-101-014 $29.88MFR2 354-102-001 $44.82MFR 354-102-002 $14.94SFR 354-102-003 $14.94SFR 354-102-004 $74.70MFR5 354-102-005 $14.94SFR 354-102-006 $14.94SFR 354-102-009 $14.94SFR 354-102-010 $14.94SFR 354-102-011 $14.94SFR 354-102-012 $29.88MFR2 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-102-013 $14.94SFR 354-102-014 $14.94SFR 354-102-016 $74.70MFR5 354-103-001 $44.82MFR 354-103-002 $14.94SFR 354-103-003 $14.94SFR 354-103-004 $44.82MFR 354-103-005 $14.94SFR 354-103-008 $14.94SFR 354-103-009 $14.94SFR 354-103-010 $14.94SFR 354-103-011 $14.94SFR 354-103-012 $29.88MFR2 354-103-013 $14.94SFR 354-103-017 $74.70INST 354-103-026 $14.94SFR 354-103-029 $14.94SFR 354-103-030 $14.94SFR 354-103-033 $14.94SFR 354-103-034 $14.94SFR 354-103-035 $14.94SFR 354-103-036 $14.94SFR 354-103-037 $14.94SFR 354-103-038 $14.94SFR 354-103-039 $14.94SFR 354-103-040 $14.94SFR 354-111-001 $74.70COM 354-111-002 $74.70IND 354-112-008 $74.70COM 354-121-002 $14.94SFR 354-121-003 $29.88MFR2 354-121-004 $29.88MFR2 354-121-005 $14.94SFR 354-122-001 $74.70INST 354-122-004 $29.88MFR2 354-122-005 $29.88MFR2 354-122-006 $74.70INST 354-123-002 $14.94SFR 354-123-003 $44.82MFR 354-123-006 $7.46VSFR 354-124-001 $7.46VCOM 354-124-002 $74.70IND 354-124-003 $7.46VCOM 354-124-004 $14.94SFR 354-124-005 $29.88MFR2 354-124-006 $44.82MFR 354-124-007 $29.88MFR2 354-124-008 $14.94SFR 354-125-001 $59.76MFR4 354-125-002 $14.94SFR 354-125-003 $14.94SFR 354-125-005 $74.70COM Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-125-011 $14.94SFR 354-125-012 $14.94SFR 354-125-013 $104.58MFR7 354-126-001 $74.70INST 354-126-002 $74.70INST 354-126-003 $14.94SFR 354-126-004 $14.94SFR 354-126-005 $14.94SFR 354-126-006 $29.88MFR2 354-126-007 $29.88MFR2 354-131-001 $14.94SFR 354-131-002 $7.46VSFR 354-131-003 $14.94SFR 354-131-004 $59.76MFR4 354-131-008 $59.76MFR4 354-131-009 $29.88MFR2 354-132-002 $14.94SFR 354-132-007 $14.94SFR 354-132-008 $14.94SFR 354-132-009 $74.70COM 354-132-010 $74.70COM 354-132-011 $74.70COM 354-132-013 $14.94SFR 354-132-014 $74.70COM 354-132-015 $74.70COM 354-133-001 $74.70COM 354-133-002 $44.82MFR 354-133-005 $14.94SFR 354-133-006 $29.88MFR2 354-133-007 $14.94SFR 354-133-008 $29.88MFR2 354-133-009 $74.70COM 354-133-010 $74.70COM 354-133-011 $29.88MFR2 354-133-012 $14.94SFR 354-133-013 $29.88MFR2 354-133-014 $74.70MFR5 354-134-001 $44.82MFR 354-134-002 $14.94SFR 354-134-003 $44.82MFR 354-134-004 $29.88MFR2 354-134-005 $14.94SFR 354-134-006 $14.94SFR 354-134-007 $14.94SFR 354-134-008 $7.46VMFR 354-135-001 $44.82MFR 354-135-002 $59.76MFR4 354-135-003 $74.70COM 354-135-004 $29.88MFR2 354-135-005 $14.94SFR 354-136-001 $14.94SFR 354-136-003 $44.82MFR - 148 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-136-004 $74.70COM 354-136-005 $74.70COM 354-136-006 $74.70COM 354-136-007 $74.70COM 354-136-008 $74.70COM 354-136-009 $74.70COM 354-136-010 $14.94SFR 354-136-011 $44.82MFR 354-137-001 $74.70COM 354-137-002 $74.70COM 354-137-003 $14.94SFR 354-137-004 $74.70MFR5 354-137-005 $14.94SFR 354-137-006 $44.82MFR 354-137-007 $74.70COM 354-137-010 $74.70COM 354-141-003 $14.94SFR 354-141-005 $14.94SFR 354-142-001 $44.82MFR 354-142-002 $44.82MFR 354-142-003 $14.94SFR 354-142-004 $29.88MFR2 354-142-006 $44.82MFR 354-142-007 $74.70COM 354-142-008 $29.88MFR2 354-142-009 $14.94SFR 354-142-010 $44.82MFR 354-142-011 $74.70COM 354-143-002 $14.94SFR 354-143-003 $14.94SFR 354-143-005 $14.94SFR 354-143-006 $7.46VSFR 354-144-001 $14.94SFR 354-144-002 $29.88MFR2 354-144-003 $74.70MFR5 354-144-004 $44.82MFR 354-144-005 $29.88MFR2 354-144-006 $14.94SFR 354-144-007 $29.88MFR2 354-144-008 $14.94SFR 354-144-009 $29.88MFR2 354-144-010 $29.88MFR2 354-145-001 $14.94SFR 354-145-002 $14.94SFR 354-145-003 $14.94SFR 354-145-004 $44.82MFR 354-145-005 $44.82MFR 354-145-006 $29.88MFR2 354-145-007 $74.70MFR5 354-151-001 $29.88MFR2 354-151-002 $29.88MFR2 354-151-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-151-004 $44.82MFR 354-151-005 $14.94SFR 354-151-006 $29.88MFR2 354-151-007 $14.94SFR 354-151-008 $44.82MFR 354-151-009 $44.82MFR 354-151-010 $44.82MFR 354-151-011 $44.82MFR 354-152-001 $14.94SFR 354-152-002 $44.82MFR 354-152-003 $74.70COM 354-152-004 $74.70COM 354-152-005 $74.70COM 354-152-006 $74.70COM 354-152-007 $29.88MFR2 354-152-008 $44.82MFR 354-153-001 $29.88MFR2 354-153-002 $29.88MFR2 354-153-003 $29.88MFR2 354-153-005 $74.70COM 354-153-006 $74.70COM 354-153-007 $74.70COM 354-153-008 $14.94SFR 354-153-009 $29.88MFR2 354-153-010 $29.88MFR2 354-154-001 $14.94SFR 354-154-002 $29.88MFR2 354-154-003 $44.82MFR 354-154-004 $29.88MFR2 354-154-005 $44.82MFR 354-154-006 $29.88MFR2 354-154-007 $44.82MFR 354-154-008 $14.94SFR 354-155-001 $74.70COM 354-155-002 $29.88MFR2 354-155-003 $44.82MFR 354-155-004 $7.46VSFR 354-155-005 $14.94SFR 354-155-006 $29.88MFR2 354-155-007 $7.46VSFR 354-155-008 $29.88MFR2 354-155-009 $14.94SFR 354-156-001 $14.94SFR 354-156-002 $14.94SFR 354-156-003 $14.94SFR 354-156-004 $14.94SFR 354-156-005 $14.94SFR 354-156-006 $14.94SFR 354-157-001 $14.94SFR 354-157-002 $29.88MFR2 354-157-003 $14.94SFR 354-157-004 $44.82MFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-157-005 $44.82MFR 354-161-002 $14.94SFR 354-161-003 $14.94SFR 354-162-002 $14.94SFR 354-162-005 $14.94SFR 354-162-006 $14.94SFR 354-162-007 $14.94SFR 354-162-008 $29.88MFR2 354-162-009 $7.46VSFR 354-163-001 $14.94SFR 354-163-002 $14.94SFR 354-163-003 $14.94SFR 354-163-004 $14.94SFR 354-163-005 $74.70COM 354-163-006 $29.88MFR2 354-163-007 $29.88MFR2 354-163-008 $29.88MFR2 354-163-009 $7.46VSFR 354-163-010 $7.46VSFR 354-163-011 $29.88MFR2 354-163-012 $29.88MFR2 354-163-013 $44.82MFR 354-163-014 $14.94SFR 354-164-001 $14.94SFR 354-164-002 $29.88MFR2 354-164-003 $14.94SFR 354-164-004 $29.88MFR2 354-164-005 $29.88MFR2 354-164-006 $29.88MFR2 354-164-007 $14.94SFR 354-164-008 $14.94SFR 354-164-009 $29.88MFR2 354-164-010 $14.94SFR 354-164-011 $14.94SFR 354-164-012 $14.94SFR 354-165-001 $29.88MFR2 354-165-002 $29.88MFR2 354-165-003 $14.94SFR 354-165-005 $14.94SFR 354-166-001 $14.94SFR 354-166-002 $29.88MFR2 354-166-003 $14.94SFR 354-166-004 $14.94SFR 354-166-005 $29.88MFR2 354-166-006 $44.82MFR 354-166-007 $14.94SFR 354-166-008 $14.94SFR 354-166-009 $14.94SFR 354-166-010 $14.94SFR 354-171-001 $14.94SFR 354-171-003 $44.82MFR 354-171-004 $44.82MFR - 149 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-171-005 $14.94SFR 354-171-006 $14.94SFR 354-171-007 $14.94SFR 354-171-008 $29.88MFR2 354-171-009 $14.94SFR 354-172-001 $14.94SFR 354-172-002 $29.88MFR2 354-172-003 $14.94SFR 354-172-004 $14.94SFR 354-172-005 $29.88MFR2 354-172-006 $14.94SFR 354-172-007 $29.88MFR2 354-172-008 $29.88MFR2 354-172-009 $14.94SFR 354-172-010 $14.94SFR 354-172-011 $14.94SFR 354-173-001 $14.94SFR 354-173-002 $14.94SFR 354-173-003 $29.88MFR2 354-173-004 $44.82MFR 354-173-007 $14.94SFR 354-173-008 $7.46VSFR 354-173-009 $7.46VSFR 354-173-010 $7.46VSFR 354-175-002 $14.94SFR 354-175-003 $14.94SFR 354-175-004 $14.94SFR 354-175-005 $14.94SFR 354-175-006 $14.94SFR 354-175-007 $14.94SFR 354-175-008 $29.88MFR2 354-175-009 $29.88MFR2 354-175-011 $14.94SFR 354-175-012 $14.94SFR 354-175-014 $29.88MFR2 354-175-016 $7.46VSFR 354-175-018 $29.88MFR2 354-175-019 $14.94SFR 354-175-020 $14.94SFR 354-176-001 $14.94SFR 354-176-002 $29.88MFR2 354-176-003 $14.94SFR 354-176-005 $14.94SFR 354-176-006 $29.88MFR2 354-176-008 $44.82MFR 354-176-009 $14.94SFR 354-176-010 $14.94SFR 354-177-001 $14.94SFR 354-177-002 $14.94SFR 354-177-003 $14.94SFR 354-177-004 $29.88MFR2 354-177-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-177-007 $7.46VSFR 354-177-008 $14.94SFR 354-177-009 $29.88MFR2 354-178-001 $29.88MFR2 354-178-002 $14.94SFR 354-178-008 $14.94SFR 354-178-009 $14.94SFR 354-178-010 $14.94SFR 354-178-011 $14.94SFR 354-178-012 $14.94SFR 354-178-013 $14.94SFR 354-178-015 $14.94SFR 354-178-016 $14.94SFR 354-180-001 $7.46VSFR 354-180-003 $44.82MFR 354-180-004 $14.94SFR 354-180-010 $7.46VSFR 354-180-011 $7.46VSFR 354-180-012 $14.94SFR 354-180-013 $14.94SFR 354-180-014 $14.94SFR 354-180-015 $14.94SFR 354-180-016 $14.94SFR 354-180-017 $29.88MFR2 354-180-018 $14.94SFR 354-180-020 $7.46VSFR 354-180-021 $7.46VSFR 354-180-022 $7.46VSFR 354-180-025 $14.94SFR 354-180-026 $14.94SFR 354-180-027 $29.88MFR2 354-180-028 $14.94SFR 354-180-029 $7.46VSFR 354-180-030 $7.46VSFR 354-180-031 $7.46VSFR 354-180-032 $14.94SFR 354-180-033 $7.46VSFR 354-180-034 $7.46VSFR 354-180-035 $7.46VSFR 354-180-036 $7.46VSFR 354-180-037 $7.46VSFR 354-180-038 $7.46VSFR 354-180-039 $14.94SFR 354-180-040 $7.46VSFR 354-180-043 $7.46VSFR 354-180-044 $7.46VSFR 354-180-045 $7.46VSFR 354-180-046 $7.46VSFR 354-180-047 $7.46VSFR 354-180-048 $7.46VSFR 354-180-049 $7.46VSFR 354-180-050 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-180-051 $7.46VSFR 354-180-052 $14.94SFR 354-180-053 $14.94SFR 354-180-054 $7.46VSFR 354-180-055 $7.46VSFR 354-180-056 $7.46VSFR 354-180-057 $7.46VSFR 354-180-058 $7.46VSFR 354-180-059 $7.46VSFR 354-180-060 $7.46VSFR 354-180-061 $7.46VSFR 354-180-062 $7.46VSFR 354-180-063 $14.94SFR 354-180-064 $14.94SFR 354-203-002 $74.70INST 354-203-003 $74.70INST 354-203-008 $7.46VSFR 354-212-001 $74.70COM 354-213-001 $14.94SFR 354-213-002 $14.94SFR 354-213-003 $14.94SFR 354-213-004 $14.94SFR 354-213-005 $14.94SFR 354-213-006 $14.94SFR 354-213-007 $14.94SFR 354-213-008 $14.94SFR 354-213-009 $14.94SFR 354-213-010 $14.94SFR 354-213-011 $14.94SFR 354-213-012 $14.94SFR 354-214-002 $14.94SFR 354-214-003 $14.94SFR 354-214-004 $14.94SFR 354-214-006 $14.94SFR 354-214-007 $14.94SFR 354-214-012 $14.94SFR 354-214-015 $14.94SFR 354-214-017 $14.94SFR 354-214-019 $14.94SFR 354-214-020 $14.94SFR 354-214-021 $14.94SFR 354-214-022 $14.94SFR 354-214-023 $14.94SFR 354-214-024 $14.94SFR 354-214-025 $14.94SFR 354-214-026 $14.94SFR 354-215-001 $14.94SFR 354-215-002 $7.46VSFR 354-215-005 $14.94SFR 354-215-007 $14.94SFR 354-215-008 $14.94SFR 354-215-009 $14.94SFR - 150 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-215-012 $14.94SFR 354-215-013 $14.94SFR 354-221-001 $14.94SFR 354-221-006 $14.94SFR 354-221-009 $14.94SFR 354-221-010 $14.94SFR 354-221-011 $14.94SFR 354-221-013 $14.94SFR 354-221-014 $14.94SFR 354-221-015 $14.94SFR 354-221-016 $14.94SFR 354-221-017 $14.94SFR 354-221-019 $14.94SFR 354-221-020 $14.94SFR 354-221-021 $14.94SFR 354-221-022 $14.94SFR 354-221-023 $14.94SFR 354-221-024 $14.94SFR 354-221-025 $29.88MFR2 354-221-026 $14.94SFR 354-221-027 $14.94SFR 354-221-028 $14.94SFR 354-221-029 $14.94SFR 354-221-030 $14.94SFR 354-221-031 $14.94SFR 354-221-032 $29.88MFR2 354-221-034 $14.94SFR 354-221-035 $14.94SFR 354-221-036 $14.94SFR 354-221-038 $44.82MFR 354-221-039 $14.94SFR 354-222-001 $14.94SFR 354-222-002 $14.94SFR 354-222-003 $14.94SFR 354-222-004 $44.82MFR 354-231-005 $14.94SFR 354-231-006 $14.94SFR 354-231-007 $14.94SFR 354-231-008 $14.94SFR 354-231-009 $14.94SFR 354-231-010 $14.94SFR 354-231-011 $14.94SFR 354-231-012 $14.94SFR 354-231-013 $14.94SFR 354-231-014 $14.94SFR 354-231-015 $29.88MFR2 354-231-016 $14.94SFR 354-231-018 $14.94SFR 354-231-019 $14.94SFR 354-231-020 $14.94SFR 354-231-021 $14.94SFR 354-231-022 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-231-023 $14.94SFR 354-231-024 $14.94SFR 354-231-025 $14.94SFR 354-231-026 $14.94SFR 354-231-027 $14.94SFR 354-231-028 $7.46VSFR 354-232-001 $14.94SFR 354-232-002 $14.94SFR 354-232-003 $14.94SFR 354-232-004 $14.94SFR 354-232-005 $14.94SFR 354-232-006 $14.94SFR 354-232-007 $14.94SFR 354-232-008 $14.94SFR 354-232-009 $14.94SFR 354-232-013 $14.94SFR 354-232-014 $14.94SFR 354-232-016 $14.94SFR 354-232-017 $14.94SFR 354-232-018 $29.88MFR2 354-232-020 $14.94SFR 354-232-021 $14.94SFR 354-232-022 $14.94SFR 354-232-023 $14.94SFR 354-232-024 $14.94SFR 354-232-025 $7.46VSFR 354-232-026 $14.94SFR 354-232-027 $14.94SFR 354-233-001 $14.94SFR 354-233-004 $14.94SFR 354-233-005 $14.94SFR 354-233-006 $14.94SFR 354-233-008 $14.94SFR 354-233-009 $14.94SFR 354-233-010 $7.46VSFR 354-233-011 $14.94SFR 354-251-001 $14.94SFR 354-251-002 $14.94SFR 354-251-003 $14.94SFR 354-251-004 $14.94SFR 354-251-005 $14.94SFR 354-251-006 $14.94SFR 354-251-007 $14.94SFR 354-251-008 $14.94SFR 354-251-009 $14.94SFR 354-251-010 $14.94SFR 354-251-016 $14.94SFR 354-251-017 $14.94SFR 354-251-018 $14.94SFR 354-251-019 $14.94SFR 354-251-020 $14.94SFR 354-251-022 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-252-001 $14.94SFR 354-252-002 $14.94SFR 354-252-003 $14.94SFR 354-252-004 $14.94SFR 354-252-005 $14.94SFR 354-252-006 $14.94SFR 354-252-007 $14.94SFR 354-252-008 $14.94SFR 354-252-009 $14.94SFR 354-252-010 $14.94SFR 354-252-011 $14.94SFR 354-252-014 $14.94SFR 354-252-015 $14.94SFR 354-252-016 $14.94SFR 354-252-017 $14.94SFR 354-252-019 $14.94SFR 354-261-002 $14.94SFR 354-261-004 $14.94SFR 354-261-005 $14.94SFR 354-261-006 $14.94SFR 354-261-008 $14.94SFR 354-262-002 $14.94SFR 354-262-003 $14.94SFR 354-262-004 $14.94SFR 354-262-005 $14.94SFR 354-262-006 $14.94SFR 354-262-007 $14.94SFR 354-262-010 $14.94SFR 354-262-011 $14.94SFR 354-262-012 $14.94SFR 354-262-013 $14.94SFR 354-262-014 $14.94SFR 354-262-015 $14.94SFR 354-262-016 $14.94SFR 354-262-017 $14.94SFR 354-262-019 $14.94SFR 354-262-020 $14.94SFR 354-262-022 $14.94SFR 354-262-023 $14.94SFR 354-262-024 $14.94SFR 354-262-025 $14.94SFR 354-262-028 $14.94SFR 354-262-029 $14.94SFR 354-262-030 $14.94SFR 354-262-031 $14.94SFR 354-262-032 $7.46VSFR 354-271-001 $14.94SFR 354-271-005 $14.94SFR 354-271-006 $14.94SFR 354-271-007 $14.94SFR 354-271-016 $14.94SFR 354-271-018 $14.94SFR - 151 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-271-022 $14.94SFR 354-271-025 $14.94SFR 354-271-027 $14.94SFR 354-271-028 $14.94SFR 354-271-029 $14.94SFR 354-271-030 $14.94SFR 354-271-031 $14.94SFR 354-271-032 $14.94SFR 354-271-033 $14.94SFR 354-271-034 $14.94SFR 354-271-035 $14.94SFR 354-272-001 $14.94SFR 354-272-002 $14.94SFR 354-272-003 $14.94SFR 354-272-004 $14.94SFR 354-272-005 $14.94SFR 354-272-006 $14.94SFR 354-272-008 $14.94SFR 354-272-010 $14.94SFR 354-272-012 $14.94SFR 354-272-016 $14.94SFR 354-272-017 $14.94SFR 354-272-018 $14.94SFR 354-272-019 $14.94SFR 354-272-020 $14.94SFR 354-272-021 $14.94SFR 354-272-022 $14.94SFR 354-272-023 $14.94SFR 354-272-024 $14.94SFR 354-272-027 $14.94SFR 354-272-030 $14.94SFR 354-272-031 $14.94SFR 354-272-032 $14.94SFR 354-272-033 $14.94SFR 354-272-034 $14.94SFR 354-272-035 $14.94SFR 354-272-036 $14.94SFR 354-272-037 $14.94SFR 354-272-038 $14.94SFR 354-272-039 $14.94SFR 354-272-040 $14.94SFR 354-272-041 $14.94SFR 354-272-045 $14.94SFR 354-272-047 $14.94SFR 354-272-048 $14.94SFR 354-272-049 $14.94SFR 354-272-050 $14.94SFR 354-272-051 $14.94SFR 354-331-001 $14.94SFR 354-331-002 $14.94SFR 354-331-003 $14.94SFR 354-331-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-331-005 $14.94SFR 354-331-006 $14.94SFR 354-331-009 $14.94SFR 354-331-010 $14.94SFR 354-331-011 $14.94SFR 354-331-014 $14.94SFR 354-331-015 $14.94SFR 354-331-016 $14.94SFR 354-331-017 $14.94SFR 354-331-018 $14.94SFR 354-331-019 $14.94SFR 354-331-020 $14.94SFR 354-331-021 $14.94SFR 354-331-022 $14.94SFR 354-331-023 $14.94SFR 354-331-024 $14.94SFR 354-331-025 $14.94SFR 354-331-026 $14.94SFR 354-331-027 $14.94SFR 354-331-028 $14.94SFR 354-331-029 $14.94SFR 354-331-030 $14.94SFR 354-331-031 $14.94SFR 354-331-032 $14.94SFR 354-331-033 $14.94SFR 354-331-034 $14.94SFR 354-331-035 $14.94SFR 354-331-038 $14.94SFR 354-331-040 $14.94SFR 354-331-041 $14.94SFR 354-331-042 $14.94SFR 354-332-001 $14.94SFR 354-332-002 $14.94SFR 354-332-003 $14.94SFR 354-332-004 $14.94SFR 354-332-005 $14.94SFR 354-332-006 $14.94SFR 354-332-007 $14.94SFR 354-332-008 $14.94SFR 354-332-009 $14.94SFR 354-332-010 $14.94SFR 354-332-011 $14.94SFR 354-341-001 $14.94SFR 354-341-002 $14.94SFR 354-341-003 $14.94SFR 354-341-004 $14.94SFR 354-341-005 $14.94SFR 354-341-006 $14.94SFR 354-342-001 $14.94SFR 354-342-002 $14.94SFR 354-342-003 $14.94SFR 354-342-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-342-005 $14.94SFR 354-342-006 $14.94SFR 354-342-007 $14.94SFR 354-342-008 $14.94SFR 354-342-009 $14.94SFR 354-342-010 $14.94SFR 354-342-011 $14.94SFR 354-351-001 $14.94SFR 354-352-001 $14.94SFR 354-352-002 $14.94SFR 354-352-003 $14.94SFR 354-352-004 $14.94SFR 354-352-005 $14.94SFR 354-352-006 $14.94SFR 354-352-007 $14.94SFR 354-352-008 $14.94SFR 354-352-009 $14.94SFR 354-352-010 $14.94SFR 354-352-011 $14.94SFR 354-352-012 $14.94SFR 354-353-001 $14.94SFR 354-353-002 $14.94SFR 354-353-003 $14.94SFR 354-353-004 $14.94SFR 354-353-005 $14.94SFR 354-353-006 $14.94SFR 354-353-007 $14.94SFR 354-353-008 $14.94SFR 354-353-009 $14.94SFR 354-361-001 $14.94SFR 354-361-002 $14.94SFR 354-361-003 $14.94SFR 354-361-004 $14.94SFR 354-361-005 $14.94SFR 354-361-006 $14.94SFR 354-361-007 $14.94SFR 354-361-008 $14.94SFR 354-361-009 $14.94SFR 354-361-010 $14.94SFR 354-361-011 $14.94SFR 354-361-012 $14.94SFR 354-361-013 $14.94SFR 354-361-014 $14.94SFR 354-361-015 $14.94SFR 354-361-016 $14.94SFR 354-361-017 $14.94SFR 354-361-018 $14.94SFR 354-361-019 $14.94SFR 354-361-020 $14.94SFR 354-361-021 $14.94SFR 354-362-001 $14.94SFR 354-362-002 $14.94SFR - 152 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 354-362-003 $14.94SFR 354-362-004 $14.94SFR 354-362-005 $14.94SFR 354-362-006 $14.94SFR 354-362-007 $14.94SFR 354-362-008 $14.94SFR 354-362-009 $14.94SFR 354-362-010 $14.94SFR 354-362-011 $14.94SFR 354-362-012 $14.94SFR 354-362-013 $14.94SFR 354-362-014 $14.94SFR 354-363-001 $14.94SFR 354-363-002 $14.94SFR 354-363-003 $14.94SFR 354-363-004 $14.94SFR 354-363-005 $14.94SFR 354-363-006 $14.94SFR 354-363-007 $14.94SFR 354-370-001 $7.46CONDO 354-370-002 $7.46CONDO 354-370-003 $7.46CONDO 354-370-004 $7.46CONDO 354-370-005 $7.46CONDO 354-370-006 $7.46CONDO 354-370-007 $7.46CONDO 354-370-008 $7.46CONDO 354-370-009 $7.46CONDO 354-370-010 $7.46CONDO 354-370-011 $7.46CONDO 354-370-012 $7.46CONDO 354-370-013 $7.46CONDO 354-370-014 $7.46CONDO 354-370-015 $7.46CONDO 354-370-016 $7.46CONDO 354-370-017 $7.46CONDO 354-370-018 $7.46CONDO 354-370-019 $7.46CONDO 354-370-020 $7.46CONDO 354-370-021 $7.46CONDO 354-370-022 $7.46CONDO 354-370-023 $7.46CONDO 354-370-024 $7.46CONDO 355-030-004 $14.94SFR 355-030-005 $7.46VSFR 355-030-006 $7.46VSFR 355-030-007 $14.94SFR 355-030-008 $14.94SFR 355-030-015 $14.94SFR 355-030-018 $7.46VSFR 355-030-019 $14.94SFR 355-030-020 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 355-030-021 $14.94SFR 355-030-022 $14.94SFR 355-030-023 $14.94SFR 355-030-024 $14.94SFR 355-030-025 $7.46VSFR 355-030-026 $14.94SFR 355-081-003 $14.94SFR 355-081-004 $14.94SFR 355-081-005 $14.94SFR 355-081-006 $14.94SFR 355-081-007 $14.94SFR 355-081-009 $14.94SFR 355-082-001 $14.94SFR 355-082-002 $14.94SFR 355-082-003 $14.94SFR 355-083-001 $14.94SFR 355-083-002 $14.94SFR 355-083-003 $14.94SFR 355-083-004 $14.94SFR 355-083-005 $7.46VSFR 355-083-007 $14.94SFR 355-083-008 $14.94SFR 355-083-012 $7.46VSFR 355-083-013 $7.46VSFR 355-083-014 $14.94SFR 355-083-015 $14.94SFR 355-083-016 $14.94SFR 355-083-017 $7.46VSFR 355-100-007 $7.46VSFR 355-100-009 $14.94SFR 355-100-010 $14.94SFR 355-100-016 $7.46VSFR 355-100-017 $14.94SFR 355-100-018 $14.94SFR 355-100-019 $14.94SFR 355-100-020 $14.94SFR 355-100-021 $14.94SFR 355-100-022 $14.94SFR 355-100-023 $14.94SFR 355-100-024 $14.94SFR 355-100-025 $14.94SFR 355-100-026 $14.94SFR 355-100-027 $14.94SFR 355-100-028 $14.94SFR 355-100-029 $14.94SFR 355-100-030 $14.94SFR 355-100-031 $14.94SFR 355-100-032 $14.94SFR 355-100-033 $14.94SFR 355-100-034 $14.94SFR 355-100-035 $14.94SFR 355-100-036 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 355-100-037 $14.94SFR 355-100-038 $14.94SFR 355-100-039 $14.94SFR 355-111-001 $14.94SFR 355-111-002 $14.94SFR 355-111-003 $14.94SFR 355-111-004 $14.94SFR 355-111-005 $14.94SFR 355-111-006 $14.94SFR 355-111-008 $14.94SFR 355-112-001 $14.94SFR 355-112-002 $14.94SFR 355-112-003 $29.88MFR2 355-112-004 $14.94SFR 355-112-005 $14.94SFR 355-112-008 $14.94SFR 355-112-009 $14.94SFR 355-113-001 $14.94SFR 355-113-002 $14.94SFR 355-113-003 $14.94SFR 355-113-004 $14.94SFR 355-113-005 $14.94SFR 355-113-006 $14.94SFR 355-113-007 $14.94SFR 355-113-008 $14.94SFR 355-113-009 $14.94SFR 355-113-010 $14.94SFR 355-113-011 $14.94SFR 355-113-012 $14.94SFR 355-113-013 $14.94SFR 355-113-014 $14.94SFR 355-113-015 $14.94SFR 355-113-016 $14.94SFR 355-113-018 $14.94SFR 355-113-019 $14.94SFR 355-113-020 $14.94SFR 355-113-021 $14.94SFR 355-113-022 $7.46VSFR 355-113-023 $14.94SFR 355-113-024 $14.94SFR 355-114-001 $14.94SFR 355-114-002 $14.94SFR 355-114-003 $29.88MFR2 355-114-004 $14.94SFR 355-121-002 $7.46VSFR 355-121-003 $29.88MFR2 355-121-004 $29.88MFR2 355-121-005 $14.94SFR 355-121-006 $14.94SFR 355-121-007 $14.94SFR 355-121-008 $14.94SFR 355-121-009 $14.94SFR - 153 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 355-121-010 $14.94SFR 355-121-011 $29.88MFR2 355-122-001 $14.94SFR 355-122-002 $59.76MFR4 355-122-003 $59.76MFR4 355-122-005 $14.94SFR 355-122-006 $14.94SFR 355-122-007 $14.94SFR 355-122-008 $14.94SFR 355-122-009 $14.94SFR 355-123-001 $14.94SFR 355-123-002 $14.94SFR 355-123-003 $29.88MFR2 355-123-004 $14.94SFR 355-125-002 $14.94SFR 355-125-004 $7.46VSFR 355-125-005 $14.94SFR 355-140-001 $14.94SFR 355-140-010 $14.94SFR 355-140-012 $7.46VSFR 355-140-016 $7.46VSFR 355-140-018 $14.94SFR 355-140-022 $29.88MFR2 355-140-032 $14.94SFR 355-140-033 $14.94SFR 355-140-034 $74.70COM 357-010-002 $74.70IND 357-010-003 $74.70VIND 357-020-009 $74.70COM 357-020-010 $7.46VCOM 357-020-025 $7.46VCOM 357-020-026 $74.70VIND 357-041-001 $74.70COM 357-041-002 $74.70COM 357-041-003 $74.70COM 357-041-005 $74.70INST 357-041-010 $74.70COM 357-041-011 $7.46VCOM 357-041-013 $74.70COM 357-042-001 $74.70COM 357-042-003 $74.70COM 357-042-004 $7.46VMFR 357-042-005 $44.82MFR 357-042-006 $44.82MFR 357-042-007 $14.94SFR 357-042-008 $7.46VSFR 357-042-009 $14.94SFR 357-042-010 $14.94SFR 357-042-011 $7.46VCOM 357-042-012 $74.70COM 357-042-013 $74.70COM 357-042-014 $7.46VCOM Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-042-015 $74.70COM 357-042-017 $74.70COM 357-042-018 $74.70COM 357-042-022 $74.70COM 357-042-025 $74.70INST 357-042-028 $74.70INST 357-043-001 $74.70MFR5 357-043-003 $14.94SFR 357-043-004 $14.94SFR 357-044-001 $29.88MFR2 357-044-002 $74.70COM 357-044-003 $14.94SFR 357-044-006 $14.94SFR 357-044-007 $44.82MFR 357-044-008 $14.94SFR 357-044-009 $14.94SFR 357-044-010 $29.88MFR2 357-044-011 $74.70IND 357-044-012 $74.70IND 357-044-014 $74.70COM 357-044-015 $44.82MFR 357-044-016 $44.82MFR 357-045-001 $59.76MFR4 357-045-002 $14.94SFR 357-045-003 $14.94SFR 357-045-004 $14.94SFR 357-045-006 $14.94SFR 357-045-007 $14.94SFR 357-046-001 $14.94SFR 357-046-002 $14.94SFR 357-046-003 $14.94SFR 357-046-004 $14.94SFR 357-046-005 $14.94SFR 357-046-006 $14.94SFR 357-046-007 $29.88MFR2 357-046-008 $29.88MFR2 357-046-009 $14.94SFR 357-046-012 $14.94SFR 357-046-013 $14.94SFR 357-046-014 $14.94SFR 357-046-015 $14.94SFR 357-046-016 $14.94SFR 357-046-017 $14.94SFR 357-046-021 $14.94SFR 357-046-024 $44.82MFR 357-046-025 $14.94SFR 357-046-026 $14.94SFR 357-047-001 $14.94SFR 357-047-002 $14.94SFR 357-047-003 $29.88MFR2 357-047-007 $29.88MFR2 357-047-009 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-047-010 $44.82MFR 357-047-011 $14.94SFR 357-047-012 $14.94SFR 357-047-015 $59.76MFR4 357-047-016 $14.94SFR 357-047-018 $14.94SFR 357-047-019 $14.94SFR 357-047-020 $14.94SFR 357-051-002 $74.70COM 357-051-003 $74.70COM 357-051-004 $74.70COM 357-052-001 $74.70COM 357-052-002 $7.46VMFR 357-052-003 $14.94SFR 357-052-004 $74.70COM 357-052-007 $14.94SFR 357-052-008 $14.94SFR 357-052-014 $44.82MFR 357-052-015 $7.46VCOM 357-052-016 $29.88MFR2 357-052-017 $74.70COM 357-053-001 $14.94SFR 357-053-002 $14.94SFR 357-053-003 $14.94SFR 357-053-004 $14.94SFR 357-053-005 $14.94SFR 357-053-006 $14.94SFR 357-053-007 $14.94SFR 357-053-010 $14.94SFR 357-053-011 $14.94SFR 357-053-014 $44.82MFR 357-053-015 $44.82MFR 357-053-016 $44.82MFR 357-053-017 $74.70MFR5 357-053-018 $29.88MFR2 357-053-019 $14.94SFR 357-053-020 $14.94SFR 357-054-004 $14.94SFR 357-054-005 $14.94SFR 357-054-006 $14.94SFR 357-054-007 $14.94SFR 357-054-008 $14.94SFR 357-054-009 $29.88MFR2 357-054-010 $14.94SFR 357-054-011 $44.82MFR 357-054-014 $14.94SFR 357-054-015 $14.94SFR 357-054-020 $14.94SFR 357-054-021 $14.94SFR 357-061-003 $14.94SFR 357-061-004 $14.94SFR 357-061-005 $7.46VSFR - 154 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-061-009 $14.94SFR 357-061-010 $7.46VSFR 357-061-011 $44.82MFR 357-061-013 $14.94SFR 357-061-015 $29.88MFR2 357-061-016 $14.94SFR 357-061-017 $14.94SFR 357-061-018 $14.94SFR 357-061-019 $14.94SFR 357-061-020 $14.94SFR 357-061-022 $14.94SFR 357-061-025 $14.94SFR 357-061-026 $7.46VSFR 357-061-027 $14.94SFR 357-061-028 $14.94SFR 357-062-001 $14.94SFR 357-062-002 $14.94SFR 357-062-003 $14.94SFR 357-062-004 $14.94SFR 357-062-005 $14.94SFR 357-062-006 $14.94SFR 357-062-007 $14.94SFR 357-062-008 $14.94SFR 357-062-009 $14.94SFR 357-062-011 $14.94SFR 357-062-012 $14.94SFR 357-062-016 $14.94SFR 357-062-017 $14.94SFR 357-062-018 $14.94SFR 357-063-003 $14.94SFR 357-063-004 $14.94SFR 357-063-006 $44.82MFR 357-063-013 $14.94SFR 357-063-014 $14.94SFR 357-063-015 $14.94SFR 357-063-017 $14.94SFR 357-063-018 $7.46VSFR 357-071-001 $14.94SFR 357-071-002 $14.94SFR 357-071-003 $14.94SFR 357-071-004 $14.94SFR 357-071-006 $14.94SFR 357-071-007 $14.94SFR 357-071-008 $14.94SFR 357-071-009 $14.94SFR 357-071-010 $14.94SFR 357-071-011 $14.94SFR 357-071-013 $14.94SFR 357-071-014 $14.94SFR 357-071-015 $14.94SFR 357-071-016 $14.94SFR 357-071-017 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-071-018 $14.94SFR 357-071-019 $14.94SFR 357-071-020 $14.94SFR 357-071-021 $14.94SFR 357-071-022 $14.94SFR 357-071-023 $14.94SFR 357-071-024 $14.94SFR 357-071-026 $29.88MFR2 357-071-027 $29.88MFR2 357-071-028 $14.94SFR 357-071-029 $14.94SFR 357-071-031 $14.94SFR 357-071-032 $14.94SFR 357-071-033 $14.94SFR 357-071-034 $14.94SFR 357-072-001 $14.94SFR 357-072-004 $14.94SFR 357-072-005 $14.94SFR 357-072-006 $14.94SFR 357-072-007 $14.94SFR 357-072-008 $14.94SFR 357-072-010 $14.94SFR 357-072-012 $14.94SFR 357-072-013 $14.94SFR 357-072-014 $14.94SFR 357-072-015 $14.94SFR 357-072-017 $14.94SFR 357-072-018 $14.94SFR 357-072-019 $14.94SFR 357-072-020 $14.94SFR 357-072-021 $14.94SFR 357-072-022 $14.94SFR 357-072-026 $14.94SFR 357-072-028 $14.94SFR 357-072-029 $14.94SFR 357-072-030 $14.94SFR 357-073-001 $14.94SFR 357-073-002 $14.94SFR 357-073-003 $14.94SFR 357-081-001 $89.64MFR6 357-081-002 $74.70MFR5 357-081-003 $7.46VCOM 357-081-004 $74.70COM 357-081-006 $74.70COM 357-081-007 $74.70INST 357-081-011 $14.94SFR 357-081-012 $14.94SFR 357-081-013 $14.94SFR 357-081-014 $59.76MFR4 357-081-015 $7.46VSFR 357-081-017 $14.94SFR 357-081-021 $74.70COM Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-081-029 $14.94SFR 357-081-032 $74.70COM 357-081-033 $7.46VSFR 357-081-034 $74.70INST 357-081-035 $74.70COM 357-081-036 $14.94SFR 357-081-037 $14.94SFR 357-081-038 $74.70COM 357-082-002 $14.94SFR 357-082-003 $14.94SFR 357-082-004 $14.94SFR 357-082-005 $14.94SFR 357-082-006 $14.94SFR 357-082-007 $14.94SFR 357-082-008 $14.94SFR 357-082-009 $14.94SFR 357-082-010 $14.94SFR 357-082-011 $14.94SFR 357-082-012 $14.94SFR 357-082-013 $29.88MFR2 357-082-014 $14.94SFR 357-082-015 $14.94SFR 357-082-016 $74.70MFR5 357-082-019 $29.88MFR2 357-082-022 $74.70MFR5 357-082-023 $14.94SFR 357-082-025 $14.94SFR 357-082-026 $14.94SFR 357-082-027 $14.94SFR 357-082-028 $14.94SFR 357-082-029 $14.94SFR 357-082-030 $14.94SFR 357-083-001 $14.94SFR 357-083-003 $14.94SFR 357-083-004 $14.94SFR 357-083-005 $14.94SFR 357-083-006 $14.94SFR 357-083-007 $14.94SFR 357-083-009 $14.94SFR 357-083-012 $14.94SFR 357-083-013 $14.94SFR 357-083-014 $14.94SFR 357-083-015 $14.94SFR 357-083-016 $14.94SFR 357-083-017 $14.94SFR 357-083-018 $14.94SFR 357-083-019 $14.94SFR 357-083-020 $14.94SFR 357-083-021 $14.94SFR 357-083-023 $14.94SFR 357-083-024 $14.94SFR 357-083-025 $14.94SFR - 155 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-083-026 $14.94SFR 357-083-027 $14.94SFR 357-083-028 $14.94SFR 357-083-029 $14.94SFR 357-083-030 $14.94SFR 357-083-031 $14.94SFR 357-083-032 $14.94SFR 357-083-033 $14.94SFR 357-091-005 $59.76MFR4 357-091-006 $14.94SFR 357-091-007 $14.94SFR 357-091-011 $14.94SFR 357-091-012 $14.94SFR 357-091-014 $14.94SFR 357-091-015 $14.94SFR 357-091-018 $14.94SFR 357-091-019 $14.94SFR 357-091-020 $14.94SFR 357-091-021 $14.94SFR 357-091-023 $14.94SFR 357-091-030 $14.94SFR 357-091-031 $14.94SFR 357-091-032 $74.70MFR5 357-091-033 $29.88MFR2 357-091-034 $14.94SFR 357-091-035 $14.94SFR 357-091-036 $14.94SFR 357-091-037 $14.94SFR 357-091-039 $14.94SFR 357-091-040 $14.94SFR 357-091-041 $14.94SFR 357-093-002 $14.94SFR 357-093-003 $14.94SFR 357-093-004 $14.94SFR 357-093-006 $14.94SFR 357-093-007 $14.94SFR 357-093-008 $14.94SFR 357-093-009 $14.94SFR 357-093-010 $14.94SFR 357-093-011 $14.94SFR 357-093-012 $14.94SFR 357-093-013 $14.94SFR 357-093-014 $14.94SFR 357-093-015 $14.94SFR 357-093-016 $14.94SFR 357-093-017 $14.94SFR 357-093-018 $14.94SFR 357-093-022 $14.94SFR 357-093-023 $14.94SFR 357-093-024 $14.94SFR 357-093-025 $14.94SFR 357-093-026 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-093-027 $14.94SFR 357-093-028 $7.46VSFR 357-094-001 $14.94SFR 357-094-002 $14.94SFR 357-101-001 $74.70MFR5 357-101-002 $7.46VCOM 357-101-003 $74.70COM 357-101-004 $14.94SFR 357-101-005 $14.94SFR 357-101-006 $14.94SFR 357-101-007 $89.64MFR6 357-102-001 $14.94SFR 357-102-003 $14.94SFR 357-102-004 $14.94SFR 357-102-005 $14.94SFR 357-102-006 $14.94SFR 357-102-007 $14.94SFR 357-102-008 $14.94SFR 357-102-010 $14.94SFR 357-102-011 $14.94SFR 357-102-012 $7.46VSFR 357-102-013 $14.94SFR 357-102-014 $14.94SFR 357-103-001 $14.94SFR 357-103-004 $44.82MFR 357-103-006 $14.94SFR 357-103-007 $14.94SFR 357-103-008 $14.94SFR 357-103-010 $14.94SFR 357-103-013 $14.94SFR 357-103-014 $14.94SFR 357-103-015 $14.94SFR 357-111-001 $74.70COM 357-111-002 $14.94SFR 357-111-003 $14.94SFR 357-111-009 $74.70COM 357-111-010 $7.46VCOM 357-111-012 $29.88MFR2 357-111-013 $14.94SFR 357-111-014 $7.46VSFR 357-111-015 $14.94SFR 357-111-017 $14.94SFR 357-111-019 $29.88MFR2 357-111-020 $14.94SFR 357-111-022 $29.88MFR2 357-111-023 $14.94SFR 357-111-024 $14.94SFR 357-111-025 $14.94SFR 357-111-026 $14.94SFR 357-111-027 $14.94SFR 357-111-028 $14.94SFR 357-111-029 $74.70COM Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-111-034 $14.94SFR 357-111-035 $14.94SFR 357-111-036 $74.70COM 357-112-001 $14.94SFR 357-112-002 $14.94SFR 357-112-003 $14.94SFR 357-112-004 $14.94SFR 357-112-005 $14.94SFR 357-112-006 $29.88MFR2 357-112-007 $29.88MFR2 357-112-008 $14.94SFR 357-112-009 $14.94SFR 357-112-010 $14.94SFR 357-112-011 $14.94SFR 357-112-013 $29.88MFR2 357-112-014 $29.88MFR2 357-112-016 $14.94SFR 357-112-017 $14.94SFR 357-112-018 $14.94SFR 357-112-019 $14.94SFR 357-112-020 $14.94SFR 357-112-021 $14.94SFR 357-112-022 $14.94SFR 357-112-023 $14.94SFR 357-112-025 $14.94SFR 357-112-026 $14.94SFR 357-112-027 $14.94SFR 357-113-001 $14.94SFR 357-113-002 $14.94SFR 357-113-003 $14.94SFR 357-120-002 $74.70COM 357-120-003 $7.46VCOM 357-120-013 $14.94SFR 357-120-014 $14.94SFR 357-120-015 $14.94SFR 357-120-016 $14.94SFR 357-120-017 $14.94SFR 357-120-018 $14.94SFR 357-120-019 $14.94SFR 357-120-020 $14.94SFR 357-120-021 $14.94SFR 357-120-022 $14.94SFR 357-120-023 $14.94SFR 357-120-024 $14.94SFR 357-120-025 $14.94SFR 357-120-026 $14.94SFR 357-120-027 $14.94SFR 357-120-028 $14.94SFR 357-120-029 $14.94SFR 357-120-030 $14.94SFR 357-120-031 $14.94SFR 357-120-032 $14.94SFR - 156 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-120-033 $14.94SFR 357-120-034 $14.94SFR 357-120-035 $14.94SFR 357-120-036 $14.94SFR 357-120-037 $14.94SFR 357-120-038 $14.94SFR 357-120-039 $14.94SFR 357-120-040 $14.94SFR 357-120-041 $14.94SFR 357-120-042 $14.94SFR 357-120-043 $14.94SFR 357-120-044 $14.94SFR 357-120-045 $14.94SFR 357-120-046 $14.94SFR 357-120-047 $14.94SFR 357-120-048 $14.94SFR 357-120-049 $14.94SFR 357-120-050 $14.94SFR 357-120-051 $14.94SFR 357-120-052 $14.94SFR 357-120-053 $14.94SFR 357-120-054 $14.94SFR 357-120-055 $14.94SFR 357-120-056 $14.94SFR 357-120-057 $14.94SFR 357-120-058 $14.94SFR 357-120-059 $14.94SFR 357-120-060 $14.94SFR 357-120-061 $14.94SFR 357-120-062 $14.94SFR 357-120-063 $14.94SFR 357-120-064 $14.94SFR 357-120-065 $14.94SFR 357-120-066 $14.94SFR 357-120-067 $14.94SFR 357-120-068 $14.94SFR 357-120-069 $14.94SFR 357-120-070 $14.94SFR 357-120-073 $104.58MFR7 357-131-001 $14.94SFR 357-131-003 $14.94SFR 357-131-005 $14.94SFR 357-131-006 $14.94SFR 357-131-007 $14.94SFR 357-131-010 $14.94SFR 357-131-012 $14.94SFR 357-131-013 $14.94SFR 357-131-014 $14.94SFR 357-131-015 $14.94SFR 357-131-016 $14.94SFR 357-131-017 $14.94SFR 357-131-019 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-131-020 $14.94SFR 357-131-021 $14.94SFR 357-131-023 $14.94SFR 357-132-017 $74.70COM 357-132-018 $74.70COM 357-132-019 $74.70COM 357-140-010 $7.46VCOM 357-140-011 $14.94SFR 357-140-016 $7.46VCOM 357-140-032 $14.94SFR 357-140-033 $89.64MFR6 357-140-037 $7.46VSFR 357-140-039 $14.94SFR 357-140-041 $14.94SFR 357-140-043 $74.70COM 357-140-044 $29.88MFR2 357-140-045 $7.46VCOM 357-140-046 $74.70MFR5 357-140-047 $74.70MFR5 357-140-054 $29.88MFR2 357-140-056 $7.46VSFR 357-140-057 $7.46VSFR 357-140-058 $7.46VSFR 357-140-059 $7.46VSFR 357-140-060 $7.46VSFR 357-151-002 $7.46VCOM 357-151-008 $74.70COM 357-151-013 $14.94SFR 357-151-014 $14.94SFR 357-151-020 $14.94SFR 357-151-027 $74.70COM 357-151-028 $74.70COM 357-151-029 $74.70COM 357-151-030 $74.70COM 357-151-031 $74.70COM 357-151-032 $14.94SFR 357-151-035 $14.94SFR 357-151-036 $74.70COM 357-151-037 $14.94SFR 357-152-001 $14.94SFR 357-152-002 $14.94SFR 357-152-003 $14.94SFR 357-152-004 $14.94SFR 357-152-006 $14.94SFR 357-152-007 $14.94SFR 357-152-010 $14.94SFR 357-152-011 $14.94SFR 357-152-012 $14.94SFR 357-152-014 $44.82MFR 357-152-015 $14.94SFR 357-152-016 $14.94SFR 357-152-017 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-152-018 $14.94SFR 357-152-019 $14.94SFR 357-152-020 $14.94SFR 357-152-021 $29.88MFR2 357-152-022 $14.94SFR 357-152-027 $74.70MFR5 357-152-031 $74.70MFR5 357-152-033 $59.76MFR4 357-152-034 $14.94SFR 357-152-035 $14.94SFR 357-152-036 $14.94SFR 357-152-037 $14.94SFR 357-161-006 $74.70COM 357-161-007 $14.94SFR 357-161-008 $29.88MFR2 357-161-009 $14.94SFR 357-161-010 $14.94SFR 357-162-002 $14.94SFR 357-162-003 $29.88MFR2 357-162-005 $14.94SFR 357-162-006 $14.94SFR 357-162-007 $14.94SFR 357-162-010 $14.94SFR 357-162-011 $14.94SFR 357-162-012 $14.94SFR 357-162-017 $14.94SFR 357-162-018 $44.82MFR 357-162-019 $74.70INST 357-162-028 $14.94SFR 357-162-029 $14.94SFR 357-162-032 $14.94SFR 357-162-033 $14.94SFR 357-162-034 $14.94SFR 357-163-005 $14.94SFR 357-163-006 $14.94SFR 357-163-007 $29.88MFR2 357-163-010 $74.70INST 357-163-016 $74.70COM 357-163-017 $14.94SFR 357-163-025 $74.70MFR5 357-163-026 $44.82MFR 357-163-027 $59.76MFR4 357-163-028 $14.94SFR 357-163-031 $14.94SFR 357-171-001 $74.70COM 357-171-002 $7.46VCOM 357-171-003 $74.70COM 357-171-004 $74.70COM 357-171-005 $74.70COM 357-171-008 $7.46VCOM 357-171-009 $74.70COM 357-171-010 $7.46VCOM - 157 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-171-013 $59.76MFR4 357-171-014 $74.70MFR5 357-171-016 $74.70MFR5 357-171-018 $74.70MFR5 357-171-019 $74.70COM 357-171-020 $7.46VCOM 357-172-005 $44.82MFR 357-172-006 $74.70MFR5 357-173-002 $14.94SFR 357-173-003 $14.94SFR 357-173-004 $29.88MFR2 357-173-005 $29.88MFR2 357-173-006 $14.94SFR 357-173-007 $14.94SFR 357-173-008 $14.94SFR 357-173-009 $14.94SFR 357-173-010 $14.94SFR 357-173-011 $14.94SFR 357-173-012 $14.94SFR 357-173-013 $14.94SFR 357-173-014 $14.94SFR 357-173-015 $14.94SFR 357-173-016 $14.94SFR 357-173-018 $14.94SFR 357-173-019 $14.94SFR 357-173-020 $14.94SFR 357-174-001 $14.94SFR 357-174-002 $14.94SFR 357-174-003 $14.94SFR 357-174-004 $14.94SFR 357-174-005 $14.94SFR 357-174-006 $14.94SFR 357-174-007 $14.94SFR 357-174-008 $14.94SFR 357-174-009 $14.94SFR 357-174-010 $14.94SFR 357-174-011 $14.94SFR 357-174-012 $14.94SFR 357-174-013 $14.94SFR 357-174-014 $14.94SFR 357-174-015 $14.94SFR 357-174-016 $14.94SFR 357-174-017 $29.88MFR2 357-174-018 $14.94SFR 357-174-019 $14.94SFR 357-174-020 $14.94SFR 357-174-021 $14.94SFR 357-174-022 $14.94SFR 357-175-001 $14.94SFR 357-175-002 $14.94SFR 357-175-003 $14.94SFR 357-175-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-175-005 $14.94SFR 357-175-006 $14.94SFR 357-175-007 $14.94SFR 357-175-008 $14.94SFR 357-175-009 $14.94SFR 357-181-001 $74.70COM 357-181-002 $74.70INST 357-181-003 $14.94SFR 357-181-004 $14.94SFR 357-181-009 $89.64MFR6 357-181-010 $74.70COM 357-181-011 $29.88MFR2 357-182-001 $14.94SFR 357-182-008 $14.94SFR 357-182-010 $44.82MFR 357-182-011 $59.76MFR4 357-182-012 $74.70MFR5 357-183-001 $74.70MFR5 357-183-002 $14.94SFR 357-183-003 $14.94SFR 357-183-004 $59.76MFR4 357-183-005 $14.94SFR 357-183-006 $74.70MFR5 357-183-007 $14.94SFR 357-183-008 $14.94SFR 357-183-009 $14.94SFR 357-183-010 $14.94SFR 357-183-011 $14.94SFR 357-183-012 $14.94SFR 357-183-013 $14.94SFR 357-183-014 $14.94SFR 357-183-015 $74.70MFR5 357-184-001 $14.94SFR 357-184-004 $14.94SFR 357-184-005 $29.88MFR2 357-184-007 $14.94SFR 357-184-008 $14.94SFR 357-184-009 $14.94SFR 357-184-010 $14.94SFR 357-184-011 $14.94SFR 357-184-012 $7.46VSFR 357-184-013 $7.46VSFR 357-184-014 $14.94SFR 357-185-001 $74.70COM 357-186-002 $74.70COM 357-186-004 $74.70COM 357-186-005 $74.70COM 357-186-008 $74.70COM 357-186-013 $74.70COM 357-186-014 $7.46VCOM 357-186-015 $14.94SFR 357-191-001 $74.70COM Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-191-002 $14.94SFR 357-191-003 $14.94SFR 357-191-004 $14.94SFR 357-191-005 $14.94SFR 357-191-006 $29.88MFR2 357-191-007 $14.94SFR 357-191-008 $14.94SFR 357-191-009 $14.94SFR 357-191-010 $14.94SFR 357-191-011 $14.94SFR 357-191-012 $29.88MFR2 357-191-014 $14.94SFR 357-191-015 $14.94SFR 357-191-016 $14.94SFR 357-191-017 $14.94SFR 357-191-018 $14.94SFR 357-191-019 $14.94SFR 357-191-020 $14.94SFR 357-191-022 $14.94SFR 357-191-023 $14.94SFR 357-191-024 $14.94SFR 357-191-025 $14.94SFR 357-191-026 $7.46VSFR 357-192-001 $14.94SFR 357-192-002 $14.94SFR 357-192-003 $14.94SFR 357-192-004 $14.94SFR 357-192-005 $14.94SFR 357-192-006 $14.94SFR 357-192-007 $14.94SFR 357-192-008 $14.94SFR 357-192-009 $14.94SFR 357-192-010 $14.94SFR 357-193-006 $29.88MFR2 357-193-007 $14.94SFR 357-193-008 $14.94SFR 357-193-009 $29.88MFR2 357-193-010 $14.94SFR 357-193-011 $74.70INST 357-193-012 $14.94SFR 357-193-013 $14.94SFR 357-194-001 $7.46VSFR 357-194-003 $29.88MFR2 357-194-004 $14.94SFR 357-194-005 $14.94SFR 357-194-006 $14.94SFR 357-195-001 $14.94SFR 357-195-002 $14.94SFR 357-195-003 $14.94SFR 357-195-007 $14.94SFR 357-195-009 $14.94SFR 357-195-010 $14.94SFR - 158 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-195-012 $29.88MFR2 357-195-013 $14.94SFR 357-195-014 $29.88MFR2 357-195-015 $14.94SFR 357-195-016 $14.94SFR 357-195-017 $14.94SFR 357-195-018 $14.94SFR 357-195-019 $14.94SFR 357-195-020 $29.88MFR2 357-196-004 $14.94SFR 357-196-005 $14.94SFR 357-196-006 $14.94SFR 357-196-007 $14.94SFR 357-196-008 $14.94SFR 357-196-009 $14.94SFR 357-196-010 $7.46VSFR 357-196-011 $14.94SFR 357-196-012 $7.46VSFR 357-196-013 $14.94SFR 357-196-014 $14.94SFR 357-196-015 $14.94SFR 357-196-016 $14.94SFR 357-196-017 $14.94SFR 357-197-002 $14.94SFR 357-197-005 $14.94SFR 357-197-006 $14.94SFR 357-197-007 $14.94SFR 357-197-008 $29.88MFR2 357-197-009 $14.94SFR 357-197-010 $14.94SFR 357-197-011 $14.94SFR 357-197-012 $14.94SFR 357-197-013 $14.94SFR 357-197-014 $14.94SFR 357-197-015 $14.94SFR 357-197-016 $14.94SFR 357-198-001 $14.94SFR 357-198-002 $14.94SFR 357-198-003 $14.94SFR 357-198-004 $14.94SFR 357-198-005 $14.94SFR 357-198-007 $14.94SFR 357-198-009 $14.94SFR 357-198-011 $14.94SFR 357-198-012 $14.94SFR 357-198-013 $14.94SFR 357-198-014 $14.94SFR 357-198-015 $14.94SFR 357-198-016 $14.94SFR 357-199-001 $14.94SFR 357-199-002 $14.94SFR 357-199-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-199-004 $14.94SFR 357-199-005 $14.94SFR 357-201-001 $14.94SFR 357-201-002 $14.94SFR 357-201-003 $14.94SFR 357-201-004 $29.88MFR2 357-201-005 $14.94SFR 357-201-006 $14.94SFR 357-201-007 $29.88MFR2 357-201-008 $14.94SFR 357-201-009 $14.94SFR 357-201-016 $44.82MFR 357-201-017 $14.94SFR 357-201-018 $14.94SFR 357-201-019 $14.94SFR 357-201-020 $14.94SFR 357-201-021 $14.94SFR 357-201-022 $14.94SFR 357-201-023 $14.94SFR 357-201-024 $14.94SFR 357-201-025 $14.94SFR 357-201-026 $14.94SFR 357-201-027 $14.94SFR 357-201-029 $14.94SFR 357-202-001 $14.94SFR 357-202-002 $14.94SFR 357-202-003 $14.94SFR 357-202-005 $14.94SFR 357-202-006 $14.94SFR 357-202-007 $14.94SFR 357-202-008 $14.94SFR 357-202-009 $29.88MFR2 357-202-013 $14.94SFR 357-202-014 $14.94SFR 357-202-015 $14.94SFR 357-202-016 $14.94SFR 357-202-017 $14.94SFR 357-202-018 $14.94SFR 357-202-019 $14.94SFR 357-202-020 $14.94SFR 357-202-021 $29.88MFR2 357-202-022 $14.94SFR 357-202-023 $14.94SFR 357-202-024 $14.94SFR 357-203-002 $14.94SFR 357-203-003 $14.94SFR 357-203-004 $14.94SFR 357-203-005 $14.94SFR 357-203-006 $14.94SFR 357-203-007 $14.94SFR 357-203-008 $14.94SFR 357-203-009 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-203-010 $14.94SFR 357-203-011 $14.94SFR 357-203-012 $14.94SFR 357-203-013 $14.94SFR 357-203-014 $14.94SFR 357-204-003 $14.94SFR 357-204-006 $14.94SFR 357-204-007 $14.94SFR 357-204-009 $14.94SFR 357-204-010 $14.94SFR 357-204-012 $74.70MFR5 357-204-013 $14.94SFR 357-204-014 $14.94SFR 357-204-015 $74.70MFR5 357-204-017 $14.94SFR 357-204-018 $14.94SFR 357-210-004 $7.46VCOM 357-210-007 $7.46VCOM 357-210-008 $7.46VCOM 357-210-009 $7.46MISC 357-210-010 $7.46MISC 357-210-011 $7.46MISC 357-221-001 $14.94SFR 357-221-002 $14.94SFR 357-221-003 $14.94SFR 357-221-004 $14.94SFR 357-221-005 $14.94SFR 357-221-006 $14.94SFR 357-221-007 $14.94SFR 357-221-008 $14.94SFR 357-221-009 $14.94SFR 357-221-010 $14.94SFR 357-221-011 $14.94SFR 357-221-012 $14.94SFR 357-221-013 $14.94SFR 357-221-014 $14.94SFR 357-221-015 $14.94SFR 357-222-001 $14.94SFR 357-222-002 $14.94SFR 357-222-003 $14.94SFR 357-222-004 $14.94SFR 357-222-005 $14.94SFR 357-222-006 $14.94SFR 357-222-007 $14.94SFR 357-222-008 $14.94SFR 357-222-009 $14.94SFR 357-222-010 $14.94SFR 357-222-011 $14.94SFR 357-222-012 $14.94SFR 357-222-013 $14.94SFR 357-222-014 $14.94SFR 357-222-015 $14.94SFR - 159 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-222-016 $14.94SFR 357-222-017 $14.94SFR 357-222-018 $14.94SFR 357-222-019 $14.94SFR 357-222-020 $14.94SFR 357-222-021 $14.94SFR 357-222-022 $14.94SFR 357-223-001 $14.94SFR 357-223-002 $14.94SFR 357-223-003 $14.94SFR 357-223-004 $14.94SFR 357-223-005 $14.94SFR 357-223-006 $14.94SFR 357-223-007 $14.94SFR 357-223-008 $14.94SFR 357-223-009 $14.94SFR 357-223-010 $14.94SFR 357-223-011 $14.94SFR 357-223-012 $14.94SFR 357-223-013 $14.94SFR 357-223-014 $14.94SFR 357-223-015 $14.94SFR 357-223-016 $14.94SFR 357-223-017 $14.94SFR 357-223-018 $14.94SFR 357-223-019 $14.94SFR 357-223-020 $14.94SFR 357-223-021 $14.94SFR 357-223-022 $14.94SFR 357-223-023 $14.94SFR 357-223-024 $14.94SFR 357-223-025 $14.94SFR 357-223-026 $14.94SFR 357-223-027 $14.94SFR 357-223-028 $14.94SFR 357-223-029 $14.94SFR 357-224-001 $14.94SFR 357-224-002 $14.94SFR 357-224-003 $14.94SFR 357-224-004 $14.94SFR 357-224-005 $14.94SFR 357-224-006 $14.94SFR 357-224-007 $14.94SFR 357-224-008 $14.94SFR 357-224-009 $14.94SFR 357-224-010 $14.94SFR 357-224-011 $14.94SFR 357-224-012 $14.94SFR 357-224-013 $7.46VSFR 357-224-014 $14.94SFR 357-224-015 $14.94SFR 357-224-016 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-224-017 $14.94SFR 357-224-018 $14.94SFR 357-224-021 $14.94SFR 357-224-022 $14.94SFR 357-224-023 $14.94SFR 357-224-024 $14.94SFR 357-224-025 $14.94SFR 357-224-026 $14.94SFR 357-224-028 $14.94SFR 357-224-032 $14.94SFR 357-225-001 $14.94SFR 357-225-002 $14.94SFR 357-225-003 $14.94SFR 357-225-006 $14.94SFR 357-225-007 $14.94SFR 357-225-008 $14.94SFR 357-225-009 $14.94SFR 357-225-010 $14.94SFR 357-225-011 $14.94SFR 357-225-012 $14.94SFR 357-225-013 $14.94SFR 357-225-014 $14.94SFR 357-225-015 $14.94SFR 357-225-016 $14.94SFR 357-225-017 $14.94SFR 357-225-018 $14.94SFR 357-225-019 $14.94SFR 357-225-020 $14.94SFR 357-226-001 $14.94SFR 357-226-002 $14.94SFR 357-226-003 $14.94SFR 357-226-004 $14.94SFR 357-226-005 $14.94SFR 357-226-006 $14.94SFR 357-226-007 $14.94SFR 357-226-008 $14.94SFR 357-226-009 $14.94SFR 357-226-010 $14.94SFR 357-226-011 $14.94SFR 357-231-001 $14.94SFR 357-231-002 $14.94SFR 357-231-003 $14.94SFR 357-231-004 $14.94SFR 357-231-005 $14.94SFR 357-231-006 $14.94SFR 357-231-007 $14.94SFR 357-231-008 $14.94SFR 357-231-009 $14.94SFR 357-231-010 $14.94SFR 357-231-011 $14.94SFR 357-231-012 $14.94SFR 357-231-013 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-231-014 $14.94SFR 357-231-015 $14.94SFR 357-231-016 $14.94SFR 357-231-017 $14.94SFR 357-231-018 $14.94SFR 357-231-019 $14.94SFR 357-231-020 $14.94SFR 357-231-023 $14.94SFR 357-231-024 $14.94SFR 357-231-025 $14.94SFR 357-231-026 $14.94SFR 357-231-028 $14.94SFR 357-231-029 $14.94SFR 357-231-030 $14.94SFR 357-231-031 $44.82MFR 357-231-032 $29.88MFR2 357-231-033 $29.88MFR2 357-231-034 $29.88MFR2 357-231-035 $14.94SFR 357-231-036 $14.94SFR 357-231-037 $14.94SFR 357-231-038 $14.94SFR 357-231-039 $14.94SFR 357-231-040 $14.94SFR 357-231-041 $14.94SFR 357-231-042 $14.94SFR 357-231-043 $14.94SFR 357-231-044 $14.94SFR 357-231-045 $14.94SFR 357-232-001 $14.94SFR 357-232-002 $14.94SFR 357-232-003 $14.94SFR 357-232-004 $14.94SFR 357-232-005 $14.94SFR 357-232-006 $14.94SFR 357-232-007 $14.94SFR 357-232-008 $14.94SFR 357-232-009 $14.94SFR 357-232-010 $14.94SFR 357-232-012 $14.94SFR 357-241-001 $14.94SFR 357-241-002 $14.94SFR 357-241-003 $14.94SFR 357-241-004 $14.94SFR 357-241-005 $14.94SFR 357-241-006 $14.94SFR 357-241-007 $14.94SFR 357-241-008 $14.94SFR 357-241-009 $14.94SFR 357-241-010 $14.94SFR 357-241-011 $14.94SFR 357-241-012 $14.94SFR - 160 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-241-013 $14.94SFR 357-241-014 $14.94SFR 357-241-015 $14.94SFR 357-241-016 $14.94SFR 357-241-017 $14.94SFR 357-241-018 $14.94SFR 357-241-019 $14.94SFR 357-241-020 $14.94SFR 357-241-021 $14.94SFR 357-241-022 $14.94SFR 357-241-023 $14.94SFR 357-241-024 $14.94SFR 357-242-001 $14.94SFR 357-242-002 $14.94SFR 357-242-003 $14.94SFR 357-242-004 $14.94SFR 357-242-005 $14.94SFR 357-242-006 $14.94SFR 357-242-007 $14.94SFR 357-242-008 $14.94SFR 357-242-009 $14.94SFR 357-242-010 $14.94SFR 357-242-011 $14.94SFR 357-242-012 $14.94SFR 357-242-013 $14.94SFR 357-242-014 $14.94SFR 357-242-015 $14.94SFR 357-242-016 $14.94SFR 357-242-017 $14.94SFR 357-242-018 $14.94SFR 357-242-019 $14.94SFR 357-242-020 $14.94SFR 357-242-021 $14.94SFR 357-242-022 $14.94SFR 357-242-023 $14.94SFR 357-242-024 $14.94SFR 357-242-025 $14.94SFR 357-242-026 $14.94SFR 357-242-027 $14.94SFR 357-242-029 $14.94SFR 357-242-030 $14.94SFR 357-242-031 $14.94SFR 357-242-032 $14.94SFR 357-242-033 $14.94SFR 357-242-034 $14.94SFR 357-242-035 $14.94SFR 357-242-036 $14.94SFR 357-242-037 $14.94SFR 357-242-038 $14.94SFR 357-242-039 $14.94SFR 357-243-001 $14.94SFR 357-243-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-243-003 $14.94SFR 357-243-004 $14.94SFR 357-243-005 $14.94SFR 357-243-006 $14.94SFR 357-243-007 $14.94SFR 357-243-008 $14.94SFR 357-243-009 $14.94SFR 357-243-010 $14.94SFR 357-243-011 $14.94SFR 357-243-012 $14.94SFR 357-243-013 $14.94SFR 357-243-014 $14.94SFR 357-243-015 $14.94SFR 357-243-016 $14.94SFR 357-243-017 $14.94SFR 357-243-018 $14.94SFR 357-243-019 $14.94SFR 357-243-020 $14.94SFR 357-243-021 $14.94SFR 357-243-022 $14.94SFR 357-243-023 $14.94SFR 357-243-024 $14.94SFR 357-243-025 $14.94SFR 357-243-026 $14.94SFR 357-243-027 $14.94SFR 357-243-028 $14.94SFR 357-243-031 $14.94SFR 357-251-001 $14.94SFR 357-251-002 $14.94SFR 357-251-003 $14.94SFR 357-251-004 $14.94SFR 357-251-005 $14.94SFR 357-251-006 $14.94SFR 357-251-007 $14.94SFR 357-251-008 $14.94SFR 357-251-009 $14.94SFR 357-251-010 $14.94SFR 357-251-011 $14.94SFR 357-251-012 $14.94SFR 357-251-013 $14.94SFR 357-251-014 $14.94SFR 357-251-015 $14.94SFR 357-251-016 $14.94SFR 357-251-017 $14.94SFR 357-251-018 $14.94SFR 357-251-019 $14.94SFR 357-251-020 $14.94SFR 357-251-021 $14.94SFR 357-251-022 $14.94SFR 357-251-023 $14.94SFR 357-251-024 $14.94SFR 357-251-025 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-251-027 $14.94SFR 357-251-028 $14.94SFR 357-251-030 $14.94SFR 357-251-031 $14.94SFR 357-251-032 $14.94SFR 357-251-033 $14.94SFR 357-251-034 $14.94SFR 357-251-035 $14.94SFR 357-251-036 $14.94SFR 357-251-037 $14.94SFR 357-251-038 $14.94SFR 357-251-039 $14.94SFR 357-251-040 $14.94SFR 357-251-041 $14.94SFR 357-251-042 $14.94SFR 357-251-043 $14.94SFR 357-251-044 $14.94SFR 357-251-045 $14.94SFR 357-251-046 $14.94SFR 357-251-047 $14.94SFR 357-251-048 $14.94SFR 357-251-049 $14.94SFR 357-251-050 $14.94SFR 357-252-001 $14.94SFR 357-252-002 $14.94SFR 357-252-003 $14.94SFR 357-252-004 $14.94SFR 357-252-005 $14.94SFR 357-252-006 $14.94SFR 357-252-007 $14.94SFR 357-252-008 $14.94SFR 357-252-009 $14.94SFR 357-252-010 $14.94SFR 357-252-011 $14.94SFR 357-252-012 $14.94SFR 357-252-013 $14.94SFR 357-252-018 $14.94SFR 357-252-019 $14.94SFR 357-252-020 $14.94SFR 357-252-021 $14.94SFR 357-252-022 $14.94SFR 357-252-023 $14.94SFR 357-252-024 $14.94SFR 357-252-025 $14.94SFR 357-252-026 $14.94SFR 357-260-004 $14.94SFR 357-260-005 $7.46VSFR 357-260-006 $7.46VSFR 357-260-007 $7.46VSFR 357-260-008 $14.94SFR 357-260-009 $14.94SFR 357-260-010 $14.94SFR - 161 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-260-011 $14.94SFR 357-260-012 $14.94SFR 357-260-013 $14.94SFR 357-260-014 $14.94SFR 357-260-015 $14.94SFR 357-260-016 $14.94SFR 357-260-017 $14.94SFR 357-260-018 $14.94SFR 357-260-019 $14.94SFR 357-260-020 $14.94SFR 357-260-021 $14.94SFR 357-260-022 $14.94SFR 357-260-023 $14.94SFR 357-260-024 $14.94SFR 357-260-025 $14.94SFR 357-260-028 $14.94SFR 357-260-029 $14.94SFR 357-260-030 $14.94SFR 357-260-031 $14.94SFR 357-260-032 $14.94SFR 357-260-033 $14.94SFR 357-260-034 $14.94SFR 357-260-035 $14.94SFR 357-260-036 $14.94SFR 357-260-037 $14.94SFR 357-260-038 $14.94SFR 357-260-039 $14.94SFR 357-260-040 $14.94SFR 357-260-041 $14.94SFR 357-260-042 $14.94SFR 357-260-043 $14.94SFR 357-260-044 $14.94SFR 357-260-045 $14.94SFR 357-260-046 $14.94SFR 357-260-047 $14.94SFR 357-260-048 $14.94SFR 357-260-049 $14.94SFR 357-260-050 $14.94SFR 357-260-061 $14.94SFR 357-260-062 $14.94SFR 357-260-063 $14.94SFR 357-260-065 $14.94SFR 357-260-066 $14.94SFR 357-260-067 $14.94SFR 357-260-068 $14.94SFR 357-260-069 $14.94SFR 357-260-070 $14.94SFR 357-260-071 $7.46VSFR 357-271-001 $14.94SFR 357-271-002 $14.94SFR 357-271-003 $14.94SFR 357-271-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-271-005 $14.94SFR 357-271-006 $14.94SFR 357-271-007 $14.94SFR 357-271-011 $14.94SFR 357-272-001 $14.94SFR 357-272-002 $14.94SFR 357-272-003 $14.94SFR 357-272-004 $14.94SFR 357-272-005 $14.94SFR 357-272-006 $14.94SFR 357-272-007 $14.94SFR 357-272-010 $14.94SFR 357-272-011 $14.94SFR 357-272-012 $14.94SFR 357-272-013 $14.94SFR 357-272-014 $14.94SFR 357-272-015 $14.94SFR 357-272-016 $14.94SFR 357-272-017 $14.94SFR 357-272-018 $14.94SFR 357-273-001 $14.94SFR 357-273-002 $14.94SFR 357-273-003 $14.94SFR 357-273-004 $14.94SFR 357-273-005 $14.94SFR 357-273-006 $14.94SFR 357-273-007 $14.94SFR 357-273-008 $14.94SFR 357-273-009 $14.94SFR 357-273-010 $14.94SFR 357-273-011 $14.94SFR 357-273-012 $14.94SFR 357-273-013 $14.94SFR 357-273-014 $14.94SFR 357-273-015 $14.94SFR 357-273-016 $14.94SFR 357-273-017 $14.94SFR 357-274-009 $14.94SFR 357-274-010 $14.94SFR 357-274-011 $14.94SFR 357-274-012 $14.94SFR 357-274-019 $14.94SFR 357-274-020 $14.94SFR 357-274-023 $14.94SFR 357-274-024 $14.94SFR 357-274-025 $14.94SFR 357-274-026 $14.94SFR 357-274-027 $14.94SFR 357-274-028 $14.94SFR 357-274-029 $14.94SFR 357-274-034 $14.94SFR 357-274-035 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-274-046 $14.94SFR 357-274-048 $14.94SFR 357-274-049 $7.46VSFR 357-274-050 $7.46VSFR 357-281-001 $14.94SFR 357-281-002 $14.94SFR 357-281-003 $14.94SFR 357-281-004 $14.94SFR 357-281-005 $7.46VSFR 357-281-006 $14.94SFR 357-281-007 $14.94SFR 357-281-008 $14.94SFR 357-281-009 $14.94SFR 357-281-010 $14.94SFR 357-281-011 $14.94SFR 357-281-012 $14.94SFR 357-281-013 $14.94SFR 357-281-014 $14.94SFR 357-281-015 $14.94SFR 357-281-016 $14.94SFR 357-281-019 $14.94SFR 357-282-001 $14.94SFR 357-282-002 $14.94SFR 357-282-005 $14.94SFR 357-282-006 $14.94SFR 357-282-007 $14.94SFR 357-282-008 $14.94SFR 357-282-009 $14.94SFR 357-282-010 $14.94SFR 357-282-011 $14.94SFR 357-282-012 $14.94SFR 357-282-013 $14.94SFR 357-282-014 $14.94SFR 357-282-015 $14.94SFR 357-282-016 $14.94SFR 357-282-017 $14.94SFR 357-282-018 $14.94SFR 357-282-019 $14.94SFR 357-282-020 $14.94SFR 357-282-021 $14.94SFR 357-282-022 $14.94SFR 357-282-023 $14.94SFR 357-282-024 $14.94SFR 357-282-025 $14.94SFR 357-282-026 $14.94SFR 357-282-027 $14.94SFR 357-282-028 $14.94SFR 357-282-029 $14.94SFR 357-282-030 $14.94SFR 357-282-031 $14.94SFR 357-282-032 $14.94SFR 357-282-033 $14.94SFR - 162 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-282-035 $14.94SFR 357-282-036 $14.94SFR 357-282-037 $14.94SFR 357-282-038 $14.94SFR 357-282-039 $14.94SFR 357-283-001 $14.94SFR 357-283-002 $14.94SFR 357-283-003 $14.94SFR 357-283-004 $14.94SFR 357-283-005 $14.94SFR 357-283-006 $14.94SFR 357-283-007 $14.94SFR 357-283-008 $14.94SFR 357-283-009 $14.94SFR 357-283-010 $14.94SFR 357-291-001 $74.70VIND 357-292-002 $14.94SFR 357-292-003 $14.94SFR 357-292-004 $14.94SFR 357-292-005 $14.94SFR 357-292-006 $14.94SFR 357-292-007 $14.94SFR 357-292-008 $14.94SFR 357-292-009 $14.94SFR 357-292-010 $14.94SFR 357-292-011 $14.94SFR 357-292-014 $14.94SFR 357-292-015 $14.94SFR 357-292-016 $14.94SFR 357-292-017 $7.46VSFR 357-292-018 $14.94SFR 357-293-001 $14.94SFR 357-293-002 $14.94SFR 357-293-003 $14.94SFR 357-293-004 $14.94SFR 357-293-005 $14.94SFR 357-293-006 $14.94SFR 357-293-007 $14.94SFR 357-293-008 $14.94SFR 357-293-009 $14.94SFR 357-293-011 $14.94SFR 357-300-001 $74.70IND 357-371-002 $29.88MFR2 357-371-005 $7.46VSFR 357-371-006 $7.46VSFR 357-371-007 $7.46VSFR 357-371-008 $7.46VSFR 357-371-012 $14.94SFR 357-371-013 $7.46VSFR 357-371-014 $7.46VSFR 357-371-015 $7.46VSFR 357-371-016 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 357-371-017 $14.94SFR 357-371-018 $14.94SFR 357-371-019 $14.94SFR 357-371-020 $14.94SFR 357-371-022 $14.94SFR 357-371-023 $14.94SFR 357-371-024 $14.94SFR 357-371-025 $29.88MFR2 357-371-028 $14.94SFR 357-371-029 $14.94SFR 357-371-030 $14.94SFR 357-371-031 $14.94SFR 357-371-032 $14.94SFR 357-371-033 $14.94SFR 357-371-034 $14.94SFR 358-080-001 $14.94SFR 358-080-002 $14.94SFR 358-080-003 $14.94SFR 358-080-004 $14.94SFR 358-080-005 $14.94SFR 358-080-006 $14.94SFR 358-080-007 $14.94SFR 358-080-008 $14.94SFR 358-080-009 $14.94SFR 358-080-010 $14.94SFR 358-080-011 $14.94SFR 358-091-001 $14.94SFR 358-091-002 $14.94SFR 358-091-003 $14.94SFR 358-091-004 $14.94SFR 358-091-005 $14.94SFR 358-091-006 $14.94SFR 358-091-007 $14.94SFR 358-091-008 $14.94SFR 358-091-009 $14.94SFR 358-091-010 $14.94SFR 358-091-011 $14.94SFR 358-091-012 $14.94SFR 358-091-013 $14.94SFR 358-091-014 $14.94SFR 358-091-015 $14.94SFR 358-091-016 $14.94SFR 358-091-017 $14.94SFR 358-091-018 $14.94SFR 358-091-019 $14.94SFR 358-092-001 $14.94SFR 358-092-002 $14.94SFR 358-092-003 $14.94SFR 358-092-004 $14.94SFR 358-092-005 $14.94SFR 358-092-006 $14.94SFR 358-092-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-092-008 $14.94SFR 358-092-009 $14.94SFR 358-092-010 $14.94SFR 358-092-011 $14.94SFR 358-093-001 $14.94SFR 358-093-002 $14.94SFR 358-093-003 $14.94SFR 358-093-004 $14.94SFR 358-093-005 $14.94SFR 358-093-006 $14.94SFR 358-093-007 $14.94SFR 358-093-008 $14.94SFR 358-093-009 $14.94SFR 358-093-010 $14.94SFR 358-093-011 $14.94SFR 358-101-001 $14.94SFR 358-101-002 $14.94SFR 358-101-003 $14.94SFR 358-101-004 $14.94SFR 358-101-005 $14.94SFR 358-101-006 $14.94SFR 358-101-007 $14.94SFR 358-101-008 $14.94SFR 358-101-009 $14.94SFR 358-101-010 $14.94SFR 358-101-011 $14.94SFR 358-101-012 $14.94SFR 358-101-013 $14.94SFR 358-101-014 $14.94SFR 358-101-015 $14.94SFR 358-102-001 $14.94SFR 358-102-002 $14.94SFR 358-102-003 $14.94SFR 358-102-004 $14.94SFR 358-102-005 $14.94SFR 358-102-006 $14.94SFR 358-102-007 $14.94SFR 358-102-008 $14.94SFR 358-102-009 $14.94SFR 358-102-010 $14.94SFR 358-102-011 $14.94SFR 358-102-012 $14.94SFR 358-102-013 $14.94SFR 358-102-014 $14.94SFR 358-102-015 $14.94SFR 358-102-016 $14.94SFR 358-102-017 $14.94SFR 358-103-001 $14.94SFR 358-103-002 $14.94SFR 358-103-003 $14.94SFR 358-103-004 $14.94SFR 358-103-005 $14.94SFR - 163 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-103-006 $14.94SFR 358-103-007 $14.94SFR 358-103-008 $14.94SFR 358-103-009 $14.94SFR 358-103-010 $14.94SFR 358-103-011 $14.94SFR 358-103-012 $14.94SFR 358-103-013 $14.94SFR 358-103-014 $14.94SFR 358-103-015 $14.94SFR 358-103-016 $14.94SFR 358-103-017 $14.94SFR 358-103-018 $14.94SFR 358-103-019 $14.94SFR 358-103-020 $14.94SFR 358-103-021 $14.94SFR 358-103-022 $14.94SFR 358-103-023 $14.94SFR 358-103-024 $14.94SFR 358-103-025 $14.94SFR 358-103-026 $14.94SFR 358-103-027 $14.94SFR 358-103-028 $14.94SFR 358-104-001 $14.94SFR 358-104-002 $14.94SFR 358-104-003 $14.94SFR 358-104-004 $14.94SFR 358-104-005 $14.94SFR 358-104-006 $14.94SFR 358-104-007 $14.94SFR 358-104-008 $14.94SFR 358-104-009 $14.94SFR 358-104-010 $14.94SFR 358-104-011 $14.94SFR 358-104-012 $14.94SFR 358-104-013 $14.94SFR 358-104-014 $14.94SFR 358-104-015 $14.94SFR 358-104-016 $14.94SFR 358-104-017 $14.94SFR 358-104-018 $14.94SFR 358-104-019 $14.94SFR 358-104-020 $14.94SFR 358-104-021 $14.94SFR 358-104-022 $14.94SFR 358-111-001 $14.94SFR 358-111-002 $14.94SFR 358-111-003 $14.94SFR 358-111-004 $14.94SFR 358-111-005 $14.94SFR 358-111-006 $14.94SFR 358-111-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-111-008 $14.94SFR 358-111-009 $14.94SFR 358-111-010 $14.94SFR 358-111-011 $14.94SFR 358-111-012 $14.94SFR 358-111-013 $14.94SFR 358-111-014 $14.94SFR 358-111-015 $14.94SFR 358-111-016 $14.94SFR 358-111-017 $14.94SFR 358-111-018 $14.94SFR 358-111-019 $14.94SFR 358-111-020 $14.94SFR 358-111-021 $14.94SFR 358-111-022 $14.94SFR 358-111-023 $14.94SFR 358-111-024 $14.94SFR 358-111-025 $14.94SFR 358-111-026 $14.94SFR 358-111-027 $14.94SFR 358-111-028 $14.94SFR 358-111-029 $14.94SFR 358-111-030 $14.94SFR 358-111-031 $14.94SFR 358-111-032 $14.94SFR 358-112-001 $14.94SFR 358-112-002 $14.94SFR 358-112-003 $14.94SFR 358-112-004 $14.94SFR 358-112-005 $14.94SFR 358-112-006 $14.94SFR 358-112-007 $14.94SFR 358-112-008 $14.94SFR 358-112-009 $14.94SFR 358-112-010 $14.94SFR 358-112-011 $14.94SFR 358-112-012 $14.94SFR 358-112-013 $14.94SFR 358-112-014 $14.94SFR 358-112-015 $14.94SFR 358-112-016 $14.94SFR 358-112-017 $14.94SFR 358-112-018 $14.94SFR 358-120-001 $14.94SFR 358-120-002 $14.94SFR 358-120-003 $14.94SFR 358-120-004 $14.94SFR 358-120-005 $14.94SFR 358-120-006 $14.94SFR 358-120-007 $14.94SFR 358-120-008 $14.94SFR 358-120-009 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-120-010 $14.94SFR 358-120-011 $14.94SFR 358-120-012 $14.94SFR 358-120-013 $14.94SFR 358-120-014 $14.94SFR 358-120-015 $14.94SFR 358-120-016 $14.94SFR 358-120-017 $14.94SFR 358-120-018 $14.94SFR 358-120-019 $14.94SFR 358-120-020 $14.94SFR 358-120-021 $14.94SFR 358-120-022 $14.94SFR 358-120-023 $14.94SFR 358-151-001 $14.94SFR 358-151-002 $14.94SFR 358-151-003 $14.94SFR 358-151-004 $14.94SFR 358-151-005 $14.94SFR 358-151-006 $14.94SFR 358-151-007 $14.94SFR 358-151-010 $14.94SFR 358-151-011 $14.94SFR 358-151-012 $14.94SFR 358-151-013 $14.94SFR 358-151-014 $14.94SFR 358-151-015 $14.94SFR 358-151-016 $14.94SFR 358-151-017 $14.94SFR 358-151-019 $14.94SFR 358-151-020 $14.94SFR 358-151-021 $14.94SFR 358-151-022 $14.94SFR 358-151-023 $14.94SFR 358-151-024 $14.94SFR 358-151-026 $14.94SFR 358-151-027 $14.94SFR 358-151-028 $14.94SFR 358-152-001 $14.94SFR 358-152-002 $14.94SFR 358-152-003 $14.94SFR 358-152-004 $14.94SFR 358-152-005 $14.94SFR 358-152-006 $14.94SFR 358-152-007 $14.94SFR 358-152-008 $14.94SFR 358-152-009 $14.94SFR 358-152-010 $14.94SFR 358-152-011 $14.94SFR 358-152-012 $14.94SFR 358-152-013 $14.94SFR 358-152-014 $14.94SFR - 164 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-152-015 $14.94SFR 358-152-016 $14.94SFR 358-152-017 $14.94SFR 358-152-018 $14.94SFR 358-152-019 $14.94SFR 358-152-020 $14.94SFR 358-152-021 $14.94SFR 358-152-022 $14.94SFR 358-152-023 $14.94SFR 358-152-024 $14.94SFR 358-152-025 $14.94SFR 358-161-001 $14.94SFR 358-161-002 $14.94SFR 358-161-003 $14.94SFR 358-161-004 $14.94SFR 358-161-005 $14.94SFR 358-161-006 $14.94SFR 358-161-007 $14.94SFR 358-162-001 $14.94SFR 358-162-002 $14.94SFR 358-162-003 $14.94SFR 358-162-004 $14.94SFR 358-162-005 $14.94SFR 358-162-006 $14.94SFR 358-162-007 $14.94SFR 358-162-008 $14.94SFR 358-162-009 $14.94SFR 358-162-010 $14.94SFR 358-163-001 $14.94SFR 358-163-002 $14.94SFR 358-163-003 $14.94SFR 358-163-004 $14.94SFR 358-163-005 $14.94SFR 358-163-006 $14.94SFR 358-163-007 $14.94SFR 358-163-008 $14.94SFR 358-163-009 $14.94SFR 358-163-013 $14.94SFR 358-163-014 $14.94SFR 358-163-015 $14.94SFR 358-163-016 $14.94SFR 358-163-017 $14.94SFR 358-163-018 $14.94SFR 358-163-019 $14.94SFR 358-163-020 $14.94SFR 358-163-021 $14.94SFR 358-163-022 $14.94SFR 358-163-023 $14.94SFR 358-163-024 $14.94SFR 358-163-025 $14.94SFR 358-163-026 $14.94SFR 358-163-027 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-163-028 $14.94SFR 358-163-029 $14.94SFR 358-163-030 $14.94SFR 358-163-031 $14.94SFR 358-163-032 $14.94SFR 358-163-033 $14.94SFR 358-163-034 $14.94SFR 358-163-036 $14.94SFR 358-164-001 $14.94SFR 358-164-002 $14.94SFR 358-164-003 $14.94SFR 358-164-004 $14.94SFR 358-164-005 $14.94SFR 358-164-006 $14.94SFR 358-164-007 $14.94SFR 358-164-008 $14.94SFR 358-164-009 $14.94SFR 358-164-010 $14.94SFR 358-164-011 $14.94SFR 358-164-012 $14.94SFR 358-171-001 $14.94SFR 358-171-002 $14.94SFR 358-171-003 $14.94SFR 358-171-004 $14.94SFR 358-171-005 $14.94SFR 358-171-006 $14.94SFR 358-171-007 $14.94SFR 358-171-008 $14.94SFR 358-171-009 $14.94SFR 358-171-010 $14.94SFR 358-171-011 $14.94SFR 358-171-012 $14.94SFR 358-171-013 $14.94SFR 358-171-014 $14.94SFR 358-171-015 $14.94SFR 358-172-001 $14.94SFR 358-172-002 $14.94SFR 358-173-001 $14.94SFR 358-173-002 $14.94SFR 358-173-003 $14.94SFR 358-173-004 $14.94SFR 358-173-005 $14.94SFR 358-173-006 $14.94SFR 358-173-007 $14.94SFR 358-173-008 $14.94SFR 358-173-009 $14.94SFR 358-173-010 $14.94SFR 358-173-011 $14.94SFR 358-173-012 $14.94SFR 358-173-013 $14.94SFR 358-173-014 $14.94SFR 358-173-015 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-173-016 $14.94SFR 358-173-017 $14.94SFR 358-173-018 $14.94SFR 358-173-019 $14.94SFR 358-173-020 $14.94SFR 358-174-001 $14.94SFR 358-174-002 $14.94SFR 358-174-003 $14.94SFR 358-174-004 $14.94SFR 358-174-005 $14.94SFR 358-174-006 $14.94SFR 358-174-007 $14.94SFR 358-174-008 $14.94SFR 358-174-009 $14.94SFR 358-174-010 $14.94SFR 358-181-001 $14.94SFR 358-181-002 $14.94SFR 358-181-003 $14.94SFR 358-181-004 $14.94SFR 358-181-005 $14.94SFR 358-181-006 $14.94SFR 358-181-007 $14.94SFR 358-181-008 $14.94SFR 358-181-009 $14.94SFR 358-181-010 $14.94SFR 358-181-011 $14.94SFR 358-181-012 $14.94SFR 358-181-013 $14.94SFR 358-181-014 $14.94SFR 358-181-015 $14.94SFR 358-181-016 $14.94SFR 358-181-017 $14.94SFR 358-181-018 $14.94SFR 358-181-019 $14.94SFR 358-181-020 $14.94SFR 358-181-021 $14.94SFR 358-181-022 $14.94SFR 358-181-023 $14.94SFR 358-181-024 $14.94SFR 358-181-025 $14.94SFR 358-181-026 $14.94SFR 358-181-027 $14.94SFR 358-181-028 $14.94SFR 358-181-029 $14.94SFR 358-181-030 $14.94SFR 358-181-031 $14.94SFR 358-181-032 $14.94SFR 358-181-033 $14.94SFR 358-181-034 $14.94SFR 358-181-037 $14.94SFR 358-181-038 $14.94SFR 358-181-039 $14.94SFR - 165 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-181-040 $14.94SFR 358-181-042 $14.94SFR 358-181-043 $14.94SFR 358-182-001 $14.94SFR 358-182-002 $14.94SFR 358-182-003 $14.94SFR 358-182-004 $14.94SFR 358-182-005 $14.94SFR 358-182-006 $14.94SFR 358-182-007 $14.94SFR 358-182-008 $14.94SFR 358-182-009 $14.94SFR 358-182-010 $14.94SFR 358-182-011 $14.94SFR 358-182-012 $14.94SFR 358-182-013 $14.94SFR 358-183-001 $14.94SFR 358-183-002 $14.94SFR 358-183-003 $14.94SFR 358-183-004 $14.94SFR 358-183-005 $14.94SFR 358-183-006 $14.94SFR 358-183-007 $14.94SFR 358-183-008 $14.94SFR 358-183-009 $14.94SFR 358-183-010 $14.94SFR 358-183-011 $14.94SFR 358-183-012 $14.94SFR 358-183-013 $14.94SFR 358-183-014 $14.94SFR 358-183-015 $14.94SFR 358-183-016 $14.94SFR 358-184-001 $14.94SFR 358-184-002 $14.94SFR 358-184-003 $14.94SFR 358-185-001 $14.94SFR 358-185-002 $14.94SFR 358-185-003 $14.94SFR 358-185-004 $14.94SFR 358-185-005 $14.94SFR 358-185-006 $14.94SFR 358-191-002 $14.94SFR 358-191-003 $14.94SFR 358-191-004 $14.94SFR 358-191-005 $14.94SFR 358-191-006 $14.94SFR 358-191-007 $14.94SFR 358-191-008 $14.94SFR 358-191-009 $14.94SFR 358-191-010 $14.94SFR 358-191-011 $14.94SFR 358-191-012 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-191-013 $14.94SFR 358-191-014 $14.94SFR 358-191-015 $14.94SFR 358-191-016 $14.94SFR 358-191-017 $14.94SFR 358-191-018 $14.94SFR 358-191-019 $14.94SFR 358-191-020 $14.94SFR 358-191-021 $14.94SFR 358-191-022 $14.94SFR 358-191-023 $14.94SFR 358-191-024 $14.94SFR 358-191-025 $14.94SFR 358-191-026 $14.94SFR 358-191-027 $14.94SFR 358-191-028 $14.94SFR 358-191-029 $14.94SFR 358-191-030 $14.94SFR 358-191-031 $14.94SFR 358-191-032 $14.94SFR 358-191-033 $14.94SFR 358-191-034 $14.94SFR 358-191-035 $14.94SFR 358-191-036 $14.94SFR 358-191-037 $14.94SFR 358-201-007 $14.94SFR 358-201-008 $14.94SFR 358-201-009 $14.94SFR 358-201-010 $14.94SFR 358-201-011 $14.94SFR 358-201-012 $14.94SFR 358-202-001 $14.94SFR 358-202-002 $14.94SFR 358-202-003 $14.94SFR 358-202-004 $14.94SFR 358-202-005 $14.94SFR 358-202-006 $14.94SFR 358-202-007 $14.94SFR 358-202-010 $14.94SFR 358-202-011 $14.94SFR 358-202-012 $14.94SFR 358-202-013 $14.94SFR 358-202-014 $14.94SFR 358-202-015 $14.94SFR 358-202-016 $14.94SFR 358-202-017 $14.94SFR 358-202-018 $14.94SFR 358-202-019 $14.94SFR 358-202-020 $14.94SFR 358-202-021 $14.94SFR 358-202-022 $14.94SFR 358-203-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-203-002 $14.94SFR 358-203-003 $14.94SFR 358-203-004 $14.94SFR 358-203-005 $14.94SFR 358-203-006 $14.94SFR 358-203-007 $14.94SFR 358-203-008 $14.94SFR 358-203-009 $14.94SFR 358-203-010 $14.94SFR 358-203-011 $14.94SFR 358-203-012 $14.94SFR 358-204-001 $14.94SFR 358-204-002 $14.94SFR 358-204-003 $14.94SFR 358-204-004 $14.94SFR 358-204-005 $14.94SFR 358-204-006 $14.94SFR 358-204-007 $14.94SFR 358-204-008 $14.94SFR 358-204-009 $14.94SFR 358-204-010 $14.94SFR 358-204-011 $14.94SFR 358-204-012 $14.94SFR 358-204-013 $14.94SFR 358-204-014 $14.94SFR 358-204-015 $14.94SFR 358-204-016 $14.94SFR 358-204-017 $14.94SFR 358-204-018 $14.94SFR 358-204-019 $14.94SFR 358-204-020 $14.94SFR 358-204-021 $14.94SFR 358-204-022 $14.94SFR 358-211-001 $14.94SFR 358-211-002 $14.94SFR 358-211-003 $14.94SFR 358-211-004 $14.94SFR 358-211-005 $14.94SFR 358-211-006 $14.94SFR 358-211-007 $14.94SFR 358-211-008 $14.94SFR 358-211-009 $14.94SFR 358-211-010 $14.94SFR 358-211-011 $14.94SFR 358-211-012 $14.94SFR 358-211-013 $14.94SFR 358-211-014 $14.94SFR 358-211-015 $14.94SFR 358-211-016 $14.94SFR 358-211-017 $14.94SFR 358-211-018 $14.94SFR 358-211-019 $14.94SFR - 166 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-211-020 $14.94SFR 358-211-021 $14.94SFR 358-211-022 $14.94SFR 358-211-023 $14.94SFR 358-211-024 $14.94SFR 358-211-025 $14.94SFR 358-211-026 $14.94SFR 358-211-027 $14.94SFR 358-211-028 $14.94SFR 358-211-029 $14.94SFR 358-212-001 $14.94SFR 358-212-002 $14.94SFR 358-212-003 $14.94SFR 358-212-004 $14.94SFR 358-212-005 $14.94SFR 358-212-006 $14.94SFR 358-212-007 $14.94SFR 358-212-008 $14.94SFR 358-212-009 $14.94SFR 358-212-010 $14.94SFR 358-212-011 $14.94SFR 358-212-012 $14.94SFR 358-212-013 $14.94SFR 358-212-014 $14.94SFR 358-212-015 $14.94SFR 358-212-016 $14.94SFR 358-212-031 $14.94SFR 358-212-032 $14.94SFR 358-212-033 $14.94SFR 358-221-001 $14.94SFR 358-221-002 $14.94SFR 358-221-003 $14.94SFR 358-221-004 $14.94SFR 358-221-005 $14.94SFR 358-221-006 $14.94SFR 358-221-007 $14.94SFR 358-221-008 $14.94SFR 358-221-009 $14.94SFR 358-231-001 $14.94SFR 358-231-002 $14.94SFR 358-231-003 $14.94SFR 358-231-004 $14.94SFR 358-231-005 $14.94SFR 358-231-006 $14.94SFR 358-231-007 $14.94SFR 358-231-008 $14.94SFR 358-231-009 $14.94SFR 358-231-010 $14.94SFR 358-232-001 $14.94SFR 358-232-002 $14.94SFR 358-232-003 $14.94SFR 358-232-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-232-005 $14.94SFR 358-232-006 $14.94SFR 358-233-001 $14.94SFR 358-233-002 $14.94SFR 358-233-003 $14.94SFR 358-233-004 $14.94SFR 358-233-005 $14.94SFR 358-233-006 $14.94SFR 358-233-007 $14.94SFR 358-233-008 $14.94SFR 358-233-009 $14.94SFR 358-233-010 $14.94SFR 358-234-001 $14.94SFR 358-234-002 $14.94SFR 358-234-003 $14.94SFR 358-234-004 $14.94SFR 358-234-005 $14.94SFR 358-234-006 $14.94SFR 358-234-007 $14.94SFR 358-234-008 $14.94SFR 358-234-009 $14.94SFR 358-234-010 $14.94SFR 358-234-011 $14.94SFR 358-234-012 $14.94SFR 358-234-013 $14.94SFR 358-234-014 $14.94SFR 358-234-015 $14.94SFR 358-234-016 $14.94SFR 358-234-017 $14.94SFR 358-235-001 $14.94SFR 358-235-002 $14.94SFR 358-235-003 $14.94SFR 358-235-004 $14.94SFR 358-235-005 $14.94SFR 358-235-006 $14.94SFR 358-235-007 $14.94SFR 358-235-008 $14.94SFR 358-235-009 $14.94SFR 358-235-010 $14.94SFR 358-235-011 $14.94SFR 358-235-012 $14.94SFR 358-241-001 $14.94SFR 358-241-002 $14.94SFR 358-241-003 $14.94SFR 358-241-004 $14.94SFR 358-241-005 $14.94SFR 358-241-006 $14.94SFR 358-241-007 $14.94SFR 358-241-008 $14.94SFR 358-241-009 $14.94SFR 358-241-010 $14.94SFR 358-241-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-241-012 $14.94SFR 358-241-013 $14.94SFR 358-241-014 $14.94SFR 358-241-015 $14.94SFR 358-241-016 $14.94SFR 358-241-017 $14.94SFR 358-242-001 $14.94SFR 358-242-002 $14.94SFR 358-242-003 $14.94SFR 358-242-004 $14.94SFR 358-242-005 $14.94SFR 358-242-006 $14.94SFR 358-242-007 $14.94SFR 358-242-008 $14.94SFR 358-242-009 $14.94SFR 358-242-010 $14.94SFR 358-242-011 $14.94SFR 358-242-012 $14.94SFR 358-242-013 $14.94SFR 358-242-014 $14.94SFR 358-242-015 $14.94SFR 358-251-001 $14.94SFR 358-251-002 $14.94SFR 358-251-003 $14.94SFR 358-251-004 $14.94SFR 358-251-005 $14.94SFR 358-251-006 $14.94SFR 358-252-001 $14.94SFR 358-252-002 $14.94SFR 358-252-003 $14.94SFR 358-252-004 $14.94SFR 358-252-005 $14.94SFR 358-252-006 $14.94SFR 358-252-007 $14.94SFR 358-252-008 $14.94SFR 358-252-009 $14.94SFR 358-252-010 $14.94SFR 358-252-011 $14.94SFR 358-252-012 $14.94SFR 358-253-001 $14.94SFR 358-253-002 $14.94SFR 358-253-003 $14.94SFR 358-253-004 $14.94SFR 358-253-005 $14.94SFR 358-253-006 $14.94SFR 358-253-007 $14.94SFR 358-253-008 $14.94SFR 358-253-009 $14.94SFR 358-253-010 $14.94SFR 358-253-011 $14.94SFR 358-254-001 $14.94SFR 358-254-002 $14.94SFR - 167 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-254-003 $14.94SFR 358-254-004 $14.94SFR 358-254-005 $14.94SFR 358-254-006 $14.94SFR 358-254-007 $14.94SFR 358-254-008 $14.94SFR 358-254-009 $14.94SFR 358-254-010 $14.94SFR 358-254-011 $14.94SFR 358-254-012 $14.94SFR 358-254-013 $14.94SFR 358-254-014 $14.94SFR 358-254-015 $14.94SFR 358-261-001 $14.94SFR 358-261-002 $14.94SFR 358-261-003 $14.94SFR 358-261-004 $14.94SFR 358-261-005 $14.94SFR 358-261-006 $14.94SFR 358-261-007 $14.94SFR 358-261-008 $14.94SFR 358-261-009 $14.94SFR 358-261-010 $14.94SFR 358-261-011 $14.94SFR 358-261-012 $14.94SFR 358-261-013 $14.94SFR 358-261-014 $14.94SFR 358-261-015 $14.94SFR 358-261-016 $14.94SFR 358-261-017 $14.94SFR 358-261-018 $14.94SFR 358-261-019 $14.94SFR 358-261-020 $14.94SFR 358-261-021 $14.94SFR 358-261-022 $14.94SFR 358-262-001 $14.94SFR 358-262-002 $14.94SFR 358-262-003 $14.94SFR 358-262-004 $14.94SFR 358-262-005 $14.94SFR 358-262-006 $14.94SFR 358-262-007 $14.94SFR 358-263-001 $14.94SFR 358-263-002 $14.94SFR 358-264-001 $14.94SFR 358-264-002 $14.94SFR 358-264-003 $14.94SFR 358-264-004 $14.94SFR 358-264-005 $14.94SFR 358-264-006 $14.94SFR 358-264-007 $14.94SFR 358-264-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-264-009 $14.94SFR 358-264-010 $14.94SFR 358-264-011 $14.94SFR 358-264-012 $14.94SFR 358-264-013 $14.94SFR 358-264-014 $14.94SFR 358-264-015 $14.94SFR 358-264-016 $14.94SFR 358-264-017 $14.94SFR 358-264-018 $14.94SFR 358-264-019 $14.94SFR 358-264-020 $14.94SFR 358-264-021 $14.94SFR 358-264-022 $14.94SFR 358-264-023 $14.94SFR 358-264-024 $14.94SFR 358-264-025 $14.94SFR 358-264-026 $14.94SFR 358-264-027 $14.94SFR 358-264-028 $14.94SFR 358-265-001 $14.94SFR 358-265-002 $14.94SFR 358-265-003 $14.94SFR 358-265-004 $14.94SFR 358-265-005 $14.94SFR 358-265-006 $14.94SFR 358-265-007 $14.94SFR 358-265-008 $14.94SFR 358-265-009 $14.94SFR 358-265-010 $14.94SFR 358-271-001 $14.94SFR 358-271-002 $14.94SFR 358-271-003 $14.94SFR 358-271-004 $14.94SFR 358-271-005 $14.94SFR 358-271-006 $14.94SFR 358-271-007 $14.94SFR 358-271-008 $14.94SFR 358-271-009 $14.94SFR 358-271-010 $14.94SFR 358-271-011 $14.94SFR 358-271-012 $14.94SFR 358-271-013 $14.94SFR 358-271-014 $14.94SFR 358-271-015 $14.94SFR 358-271-016 $14.94SFR 358-271-017 $14.94SFR 358-271-018 $14.94SFR 358-271-019 $14.94SFR 358-271-020 $14.94SFR 358-271-021 $14.94SFR 358-271-022 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-271-023 $14.94SFR 358-271-024 $14.94SFR 358-271-025 $14.94SFR 358-271-026 $14.94SFR 358-271-027 $14.94SFR 358-271-028 $14.94SFR 358-271-029 $14.94SFR 358-271-030 $14.94SFR 358-271-031 $14.94SFR 358-271-032 $14.94SFR 358-271-033 $14.94SFR 358-271-034 $14.94SFR 358-271-035 $14.94SFR 358-271-036 $14.94SFR 358-271-037 $14.94SFR 358-271-038 $14.94SFR 358-271-039 $14.94SFR 358-271-040 $14.94SFR 358-271-041 $14.94SFR 358-271-042 $14.94SFR 358-271-043 $14.94SFR 358-271-044 $14.94SFR 358-272-001 $14.94SFR 358-272-002 $14.94SFR 358-272-003 $14.94SFR 358-272-004 $14.94SFR 358-272-005 $14.94SFR 358-291-001 $14.94SFR 358-291-002 $14.94SFR 358-291-003 $14.94SFR 358-291-004 $14.94SFR 358-291-005 $14.94SFR 358-291-006 $14.94SFR 358-291-007 $14.94SFR 358-291-008 $14.94SFR 358-291-009 $14.94SFR 358-291-010 $14.94SFR 358-291-011 $14.94SFR 358-291-012 $14.94SFR 358-291-013 $14.94SFR 358-291-014 $14.94SFR 358-291-015 $14.94SFR 358-291-016 $14.94SFR 358-291-017 $14.94SFR 358-291-018 $14.94SFR 358-291-019 $14.94SFR 358-292-001 $14.94SFR 358-292-002 $14.94SFR 358-292-003 $14.94SFR 358-292-004 $14.94SFR 358-292-005 $14.94SFR 358-292-006 $14.94SFR - 168 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-292-007 $14.94SFR 358-293-001 $14.94SFR 358-293-002 $14.94SFR 358-293-003 $14.94SFR 358-293-004 $14.94SFR 358-293-005 $14.94SFR 358-293-006 $14.94SFR 358-293-007 $14.94SFR 358-293-008 $14.94SFR 358-293-009 $14.94SFR 358-293-010 $14.94SFR 358-293-011 $14.94SFR 358-293-012 $14.94SFR 358-293-013 $14.94SFR 358-293-014 $14.94SFR 358-293-015 $14.94SFR 358-293-016 $14.94SFR 358-293-017 $14.94SFR 358-293-018 $14.94SFR 358-293-019 $14.94SFR 358-293-020 $14.94SFR 358-293-021 $14.94SFR 358-293-022 $14.94SFR 358-293-023 $14.94SFR 358-293-024 $14.94SFR 358-293-025 $14.94SFR 358-293-026 $14.94SFR 358-293-027 $14.94SFR 358-293-028 $14.94SFR 358-293-029 $14.94SFR 358-293-030 $14.94SFR 358-293-031 $14.94SFR 358-293-032 $14.94SFR 358-293-033 $14.94SFR 358-293-034 $14.94SFR 358-293-035 $14.94SFR 358-293-036 $14.94SFR 358-293-037 $14.94SFR 358-293-038 $14.94SFR 358-293-039 $14.94SFR 358-293-040 $14.94SFR 358-293-041 $14.94SFR 358-293-042 $14.94SFR 358-293-043 $14.94SFR 358-293-044 $14.94SFR 358-302-001 $14.94SFR 358-302-002 $14.94SFR 358-302-003 $14.94SFR 358-302-004 $14.94SFR 358-302-005 $14.94SFR 358-302-006 $14.94SFR 358-302-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-302-008 $14.94SFR 358-302-009 $14.94SFR 358-302-010 $14.94SFR 358-302-011 $14.94SFR 358-302-014 $14.94SFR 358-302-015 $14.94SFR 358-302-016 $14.94SFR 358-302-017 $14.94SFR 358-302-018 $14.94SFR 358-302-019 $14.94SFR 358-302-020 $14.94SFR 358-302-021 $14.94SFR 358-302-022 $14.94SFR 358-303-001 $14.94SFR 358-303-002 $14.94SFR 358-303-003 $14.94SFR 358-303-004 $14.94SFR 358-310-001 $14.94SFR 358-310-002 $14.94SFR 358-310-003 $14.94SFR 358-310-004 $14.94SFR 358-310-005 $14.94SFR 358-310-006 $14.94SFR 358-310-007 $14.94SFR 358-310-008 $14.94SFR 358-310-009 $14.94SFR 358-310-010 $14.94SFR 358-310-011 $14.94SFR 358-310-012 $14.94SFR 358-310-013 $14.94SFR 358-310-014 $14.94SFR 358-310-015 $14.94SFR 358-311-001 $14.94SFR 358-311-002 $14.94SFR 358-311-003 $14.94SFR 358-311-004 $14.94SFR 358-311-005 $14.94SFR 358-311-006 $14.94SFR 358-311-007 $14.94SFR 358-311-008 $14.94SFR 358-311-009 $14.94SFR 358-311-010 $14.94SFR 358-311-011 $14.94SFR 358-311-012 $14.94SFR 358-311-013 $14.94SFR 358-311-014 $14.94SFR 358-311-015 $14.94SFR 358-311-016 $14.94SFR 358-311-017 $14.94SFR 358-311-018 $14.94SFR 358-311-019 $14.94SFR 358-311-020 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-311-021 $14.94SFR 358-311-022 $14.94SFR 358-311-023 $14.94SFR 358-311-024 $14.94SFR 358-311-025 $14.94SFR 358-311-026 $14.94SFR 358-311-027 $14.94SFR 358-311-028 $14.94SFR 358-311-029 $14.94SFR 358-311-030 $14.94SFR 358-311-031 $14.94SFR 358-311-032 $14.94SFR 358-311-033 $14.94SFR 358-311-034 $14.94SFR 358-311-035 $14.94SFR 358-311-036 $14.94SFR 358-311-037 $14.94SFR 358-311-038 $14.94SFR 358-311-039 $14.94SFR 358-311-040 $14.94SFR 358-311-041 $14.94SFR 358-311-042 $14.94SFR 358-311-043 $14.94SFR 358-311-044 $14.94SFR 358-311-045 $14.94SFR 358-311-046 $14.94SFR 358-311-047 $14.94SFR 358-311-048 $14.94SFR 358-311-049 $14.94SFR 358-311-050 $14.94SFR 358-311-051 $14.94SFR 358-311-052 $14.94SFR 358-311-053 $14.94SFR 358-311-054 $14.94SFR 358-311-055 $14.94SFR 358-311-056 $14.94SFR 358-311-057 $14.94SFR 358-311-059 $14.94SFR 358-311-060 $14.94SFR 358-311-061 $14.94SFR 358-311-062 $14.94SFR 358-311-063 $14.94SFR 358-311-064 $14.94SFR 358-311-065 $14.94SFR 358-311-066 $14.94SFR 358-311-067 $14.94SFR 358-311-068 $14.94SFR 358-311-069 $14.94SFR 358-311-070 $14.94SFR 358-311-071 $14.94SFR 358-311-072 $14.94SFR 358-311-073 $14.94SFR - 169 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 358-311-074 $14.94SFR 358-311-075 $14.94SFR 358-311-076 $14.94SFR 358-311-077 $14.94SFR 358-311-078 $14.94SFR 358-312-001 $14.94SFR 358-312-002 $14.94SFR 358-312-003 $14.94SFR 358-312-004 $14.94SFR 358-312-005 $14.94SFR 358-312-006 $14.94SFR 358-312-007 $14.94SFR 358-312-008 $14.94SFR 358-312-009 $14.94SFR 358-312-010 $14.94SFR 358-312-011 $14.94SFR 358-312-012 $14.94SFR 358-312-014 $14.94SFR 358-312-015 $14.94SFR 358-312-016 $14.94SFR 358-312-017 $14.94SFR 358-312-018 $14.94SFR 358-312-019 $14.94SFR 358-312-020 $14.94SFR 358-312-021 $14.94SFR 358-312-022 $14.94SFR 358-312-023 $14.94SFR 358-312-024 $14.94SFR 358-312-025 $14.94SFR 358-312-026 $14.94SFR 358-312-027 $14.94SFR 358-312-028 $14.94SFR 358-312-029 $14.94SFR 358-312-030 $14.94SFR 358-312-031 $14.94SFR 358-312-032 $14.94SFR 358-312-033 $14.94SFR 358-312-034 $14.94SFR 358-312-035 $14.94SFR 358-312-036 $14.94SFR 362-110-027 $7.46MISC 362-110-028 $14.94SFR 365-110-021 $14.94SFR 365-110-022 $14.94SFR 365-110-023 $14.94SFR 365-110-024 $14.94SFR 365-110-025 $14.94SFR 365-240-003 $14.94SFR 365-240-004 $14.94SFR 365-240-005 $14.94SFR 365-240-006 $14.94SFR 365-240-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 365-240-008 $7.46VSFR 365-240-009 $14.94SFR 365-240-011 $14.94SFR 365-530-001 $14.94SFR 365-530-002 $14.94SFR 365-530-003 $14.94SFR 365-530-004 $14.94SFR 365-530-005 $14.94SFR 365-530-006 $14.94SFR 365-530-007 $14.94SFR 365-530-008 $14.94SFR 365-530-009 $14.94SFR 365-530-010 $14.94SFR 365-530-011 $14.94SFR 365-530-012 $14.94SFR 365-530-013 $14.94SFR 365-530-014 $14.94SFR 365-530-015 $14.94SFR 365-530-016 $14.94SFR 365-530-017 $14.94SFR 365-530-018 $14.94SFR 365-530-019 $14.94SFR 365-530-020 $14.94SFR 365-530-021 $14.94SFR 365-530-022 $14.94SFR 366-010-009 $14.94SFR 366-010-010 $7.46MISC 367-130-003 $14.94SFR 367-130-034 $14.94SFR 367-130-035 $14.94SFR 367-130-036 $7.46VSFR 368-132-002 $14.94SFR 368-132-003 $14.94SFR 368-132-004 $14.94SFR 368-132-005 $14.94SFR 368-132-007 $14.94SFR 368-132-008 $7.46VSFR 368-132-011 $7.46VSFR 368-132-012 $14.94SFR 368-132-013 $14.94SFR 368-132-014 $14.94SFR 368-132-015 $14.94SFR 368-132-016 $14.94SFR 368-132-017 $14.94SFR 368-132-020 $14.94SFR 368-132-022 $14.94SFR 368-132-023 $14.94SFR 368-132-024 $14.94SFR 368-132-025 $14.94SFR 368-132-026 $14.94SFR 368-133-003 $14.94SFR 368-133-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 368-133-012 $14.94SFR 368-133-013 $7.46VSFR 368-134-003 $14.94SFR 368-134-004 $44.82MFR 368-134-005 $7.46VSFR 368-134-009 $7.46VSFR 368-134-011 $14.94SFR 368-134-012 $29.88MFR2 368-135-004 $14.94SFR 368-135-005 $14.94SFR 368-135-008 $14.94SFR 368-135-009 $14.94SFR 368-135-012 $14.94SFR 368-135-013 $14.94SFR 368-135-014 $14.94SFR 368-141-003 $14.94SFR 368-141-004 $44.82MFR 368-141-005 $14.94SFR 368-141-009 $14.94SFR 368-141-011 $7.46VSFR 368-141-012 $7.46VSFR 368-142-006 $14.94SFR 368-142-007 $14.94SFR 368-142-008 $14.94SFR 368-143-001 $14.94SFR 368-143-003 $14.94SFR 368-143-004 $14.94SFR 368-143-005 $14.94SFR 368-143-006 $14.94SFR 368-143-007 $14.94SFR 368-143-008 $7.46VSFR 368-144-003 $14.94SFR 368-144-004 $14.94SFR 368-144-012 $14.94SFR 368-144-013 $7.46VSFR 368-145-001 $14.94SFR 368-145-002 $14.94SFR 368-145-003 $14.94SFR 368-145-006 $14.94SFR 368-145-007 $14.94SFR 368-145-008 $14.94SFR 368-145-009 $14.94SFR 368-145-010 $14.94SFR 368-145-011 $7.46VSFR 368-145-014 $14.94SFR 368-145-015 $14.94SFR 368-145-018 $7.46VCOM 368-145-019 $74.70COM 368-145-021 $7.46VSFR 368-145-024 $14.94SFR 368-145-025 $14.94SFR 368-145-027 $74.70COM - 170 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 368-145-028 $7.46VSFR 368-145-029 $7.46VSFR 368-145-030 $7.46VSFR 368-146-001 $74.70INST 368-146-002 $14.94SFR 368-146-003 $14.94SFR 368-146-007 $14.94SFR 368-146-010 $14.94SFR 368-146-013 $7.46VCOM 368-146-014 $14.94SFR 368-146-017 $74.70COM 368-146-021 $14.94SFR 368-146-022 $14.94SFR 368-146-023 $14.94SFR 368-146-024 $14.94SFR 368-146-025 $14.94SFR 368-147-001 $7.46VCOM 368-147-002 $7.46VCOM 368-147-003 $7.46VCOM 368-147-004 $74.70COM 368-147-005 $74.70COM 368-147-006 $74.70COM 368-148-002 $14.94SFR 368-148-003 $14.94SFR 368-148-004 $14.94SFR 368-148-005 $14.94SFR 368-148-013 $14.94SFR 368-148-014 $14.94SFR 368-148-015 $14.94SFR 368-148-018 $14.94SFR 375-011-001 $74.70COM 375-011-002 $74.70COM 375-011-003 $74.70COM 375-011-004 $74.70COM 375-011-007 $14.94SFR 375-011-008 $14.94SFR 375-011-009 $14.94SFR 375-011-011 $14.94SFR 375-011-012 $74.70COM 375-011-014 $14.94SFR 375-011-015 $14.94SFR 375-011-016 $14.94SFR 375-012-003 $14.94SFR 375-012-011 $7.46VCOM 375-012-012 $7.46VCOM 375-012-013 $7.46VCOM 375-012-014 $7.46VCOM 375-013-001 $14.94SFR 375-013-002 $14.94SFR 375-013-003 $14.94SFR 375-013-004 $14.94SFR 375-013-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-013-009 $14.94SFR 375-013-010 $14.94SFR 375-013-011 $14.94SFR 375-013-012 $14.94SFR 375-013-014 $14.94SFR 375-013-016 $14.94SFR 375-014-001 $74.70COM 375-014-003 $7.46VCOM 375-014-004 $14.94SFR 375-014-005 $7.46VCOM 375-014-006 $7.46VCOM 375-022-002 $14.94SFR 375-022-003 $14.94SFR 375-022-004 $14.94SFR 375-022-005 $74.70COM 375-022-006 $7.46VCOM 375-022-007 $14.94SFR 375-022-008 $14.94SFR 375-022-009 $14.94SFR 375-022-010 $14.94SFR 375-022-011 $14.94SFR 375-022-012 $14.94SFR 375-022-013 $14.94SFR 375-022-014 $14.94SFR 375-022-016 $14.94SFR 375-022-018 $7.46VSFR 375-022-027 $14.94SFR 375-022-030 $14.94SFR 375-022-031 $14.94SFR 375-022-032 $14.94SFR 375-022-039 $14.94SFR 375-022-040 $14.94SFR 375-022-041 $7.46VSFR 375-022-042 $44.82MFR 375-022-043 $14.94SFR 375-022-044 $14.94SFR 375-022-045 $14.94SFR 375-023-001 $14.94SFR 375-023-002 $14.94SFR 375-023-005 $44.82MFR 375-023-008 $14.94SFR 375-023-009 $74.70COM 375-031-003 $14.94SFR 375-031-004 $14.94SFR 375-031-005 $14.94SFR 375-031-006 $14.94SFR 375-031-007 $14.94SFR 375-031-008 $14.94SFR 375-031-009 $14.94SFR 375-031-010 $14.94SFR 375-031-015 $14.94SFR 375-031-018 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-031-019 $14.94SFR 375-031-020 $14.94SFR 375-032-006 $14.94SFR 375-032-007 $14.94SFR 375-032-008 $14.94SFR 375-032-009 $14.94SFR 375-032-010 $14.94SFR 375-032-011 $14.94SFR 375-032-012 $14.94SFR 375-032-013 $14.94SFR 375-032-014 $14.94SFR 375-032-015 $14.94SFR 375-032-016 $14.94SFR 375-032-017 $14.94SFR 375-032-031 $14.94SFR 375-032-032 $7.46VSFR 375-032-033 $14.94SFR 375-032-034 $14.94SFR 375-032-035 $14.94SFR 375-032-036 $14.94SFR 375-032-037 $14.94SFR 375-032-038 $14.94SFR 375-032-039 $14.94SFR 375-032-040 $14.94SFR 375-032-041 $14.94SFR 375-032-042 $14.94SFR 375-041-003 $14.94SFR 375-041-004 $14.94SFR 375-041-005 $14.94SFR 375-041-006 $14.94SFR 375-041-007 $7.46VSFR 375-041-008 $14.94SFR 375-041-009 $14.94SFR 375-041-010 $14.94SFR 375-041-011 $14.94SFR 375-041-012 $14.94SFR 375-041-013 $14.94SFR 375-042-001 $7.46VSFR 375-042-002 $14.94SFR 375-042-003 $7.46VSFR 375-042-004 $14.94SFR 375-042-005 $14.94SFR 375-042-006 $14.94SFR 375-042-007 $14.94SFR 375-042-008 $14.94SFR 375-042-009 $14.94SFR 375-042-010 $14.94SFR 375-042-013 $29.88MFR2 375-042-016 $14.94SFR 375-042-018 $14.94SFR 375-042-019 $14.94SFR 375-054-010 $14.94SFR - 171 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-054-011 $14.94SFR 375-054-012 $14.94SFR 375-054-013 $14.94SFR 375-054-014 $14.94SFR 375-054-031 $14.94SFR 375-054-032 $14.94SFR 375-054-033 $14.94SFR 375-061-011 $14.94SFR 375-061-012 $14.94SFR 375-061-013 $14.94SFR 375-061-014 $14.94SFR 375-061-015 $14.94SFR 375-061-016 $14.94SFR 375-061-017 $14.94SFR 375-061-018 $14.94SFR 375-061-019 $14.94SFR 375-061-020 $14.94SFR 375-061-034 $14.94SFR 375-062-007 $14.94SFR 375-062-008 $14.94SFR 375-062-009 $29.88MFR2 375-062-014 $14.94SFR 375-062-016 $14.94SFR 375-062-023 $14.94SFR 375-062-024 $14.94SFR 375-062-025 $14.94SFR 375-062-026 $14.94SFR 375-062-028 $14.94SFR 375-062-029 $14.94SFR 375-062-030 $14.94SFR 375-063-005 $7.46VSFR 375-063-006 $14.94SFR 375-063-007 $7.46VSFR 375-063-009 $14.94SFR 375-063-010 $14.94SFR 375-063-011 $14.94SFR 375-063-012 $14.94SFR 375-063-015 $14.94SFR 375-063-017 $14.94SFR 375-063-018 $14.94SFR 375-063-019 $14.94SFR 375-063-020 $14.94SFR 375-063-021 $14.94SFR 375-063-022 $14.94SFR 375-063-023 $7.46VSFR 375-063-027 $14.94SFR 375-063-028 $14.94SFR 375-063-031 $14.94SFR 375-063-032 $14.94SFR 375-063-033 $14.94SFR 375-063-036 $14.94SFR 375-063-037 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-063-038 $14.94SFR 375-131-001 $14.94SFR 375-131-002 $14.94SFR 375-131-003 $14.94SFR 375-131-004 $14.94SFR 375-131-005 $14.94SFR 375-131-006 $14.94SFR 375-131-007 $14.94SFR 375-131-008 $14.94SFR 375-131-009 $14.94SFR 375-133-002 $14.94SFR 375-133-003 $14.94SFR 375-133-004 $14.94SFR 375-133-005 $29.88MFR2 375-133-010 $14.94SFR 375-133-012 $14.94SFR 375-133-013 $14.94SFR 375-133-014 $14.94SFR 375-133-015 $7.46VSFR 375-134-001 $14.94SFR 375-134-002 $14.94SFR 375-134-003 $14.94SFR 375-134-004 $14.94SFR 375-134-005 $14.94SFR 375-134-006 $14.94SFR 375-134-007 $14.94SFR 375-134-008 $14.94SFR 375-135-001 $14.94SFR 375-141-002 $14.94SFR 375-141-003 $14.94SFR 375-141-007 $14.94SFR 375-141-008 $14.94SFR 375-141-009 $14.94SFR 375-141-012 $14.94SFR 375-141-013 $14.94SFR 375-141-014 $14.94SFR 375-141-015 $14.94SFR 375-141-017 $14.94SFR 375-141-018 $14.94SFR 375-141-019 $14.94SFR 375-141-020 $14.94SFR 375-141-025 $7.46VSFR 375-141-026 $14.94SFR 375-141-027 $14.94SFR 375-141-028 $14.94SFR 375-141-029 $14.94SFR 375-141-030 $14.94SFR 375-141-031 $59.76MFR4 375-141-032 $7.46VSFR 375-141-033 $14.94SFR 375-141-034 $14.94SFR 375-141-035 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-142-003 $14.94SFR 375-142-004 $14.94SFR 375-142-005 $29.88MFR2 375-142-008 $14.94SFR 375-142-012 $14.94SFR 375-142-013 $14.94SFR 375-142-014 $14.94SFR 375-142-015 $14.94SFR 375-151-002 $14.94SFR 375-151-003 $14.94SFR 375-151-004 $14.94SFR 375-151-005 $14.94SFR 375-151-006 $14.94SFR 375-151-007 $14.94SFR 375-151-008 $14.94SFR 375-152-001 $14.94SFR 375-152-002 $14.94SFR 375-152-003 $14.94SFR 375-152-004 $14.94SFR 375-152-005 $14.94SFR 375-153-001 $7.46VSFR 375-154-003 $14.94SFR 375-154-007 $14.94SFR 375-154-012 $14.94SFR 375-155-002 $14.94SFR 375-155-003 $14.94SFR 375-155-004 $14.94SFR 375-161-001 $29.88MFR2 375-161-002 $29.88MFR2 375-161-003 $29.88MFR2 375-161-004 $29.88MFR2 375-161-005 $29.88MFR2 375-161-007 $14.94SFR 375-161-008 $7.46VSFR 375-161-009 $29.88MFR2 375-161-011 $14.94SFR 375-161-012 $14.94SFR 375-161-013 $14.94SFR 375-161-014 $14.94SFR 375-161-017 $14.94SFR 375-161-018 $14.94SFR 375-161-019 $14.94SFR 375-161-020 $14.94SFR 375-161-021 $14.94SFR 375-161-022 $14.94SFR 375-161-023 $14.94SFR 375-161-024 $14.94SFR 375-161-025 $14.94SFR 375-161-026 $14.94SFR 375-161-028 $14.94SFR 375-161-029 $14.94SFR 375-162-001 $29.88MFR2 - 172 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-162-002 $29.88MFR2 375-162-003 $14.94SFR 375-162-004 $14.94SFR 375-162-005 $14.94SFR 375-162-006 $14.94SFR 375-162-007 $14.94SFR 375-162-008 $14.94SFR 375-162-009 $14.94SFR 375-162-010 $14.94SFR 375-162-011 $14.94SFR 375-162-012 $14.94SFR 375-162-013 $14.94SFR 375-162-014 $14.94SFR 375-162-015 $14.94SFR 375-171-001 $14.94SFR 375-171-002 $29.88MFR2 375-171-005 $14.94SFR 375-171-006 $14.94SFR 375-171-007 $14.94SFR 375-171-008 $14.94SFR 375-171-009 $14.94SFR 375-171-010 $14.94SFR 375-171-011 $14.94SFR 375-171-012 $14.94SFR 375-171-014 $14.94SFR 375-171-015 $14.94SFR 375-171-016 $14.94SFR 375-171-017 $14.94SFR 375-171-018 $14.94SFR 375-171-019 $14.94SFR 375-172-002 $14.94SFR 375-172-003 $14.94SFR 375-172-004 $14.94SFR 375-172-005 $14.94SFR 375-172-006 $14.94SFR 375-172-008 $14.94SFR 375-172-012 $14.94SFR 375-172-015 $14.94SFR 375-172-016 $14.94SFR 375-172-017 $14.94SFR 375-172-018 $14.94SFR 375-172-019 $14.94SFR 375-172-020 $14.94SFR 375-172-021 $14.94SFR 375-172-023 $14.94SFR 375-172-024 $14.94SFR 375-172-025 $14.94SFR 375-172-026 $14.94SFR 375-172-027 $14.94SFR 375-172-028 $7.46VSFR 375-172-029 $14.94SFR 375-173-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-173-003 $14.94SFR 375-173-004 $14.94SFR 375-173-005 $14.94SFR 375-173-006 $14.94SFR 375-173-007 $14.94SFR 375-173-008 $14.94SFR 375-173-009 $14.94SFR 375-173-010 $14.94SFR 375-173-012 $14.94SFR 375-173-014 $14.94SFR 375-173-015 $14.94SFR 375-173-016 $14.94SFR 375-173-017 $14.94SFR 375-181-001 $14.94SFR 375-181-002 $14.94SFR 375-181-003 $14.94SFR 375-181-004 $14.94SFR 375-181-005 $14.94SFR 375-181-006 $14.94SFR 375-181-007 $14.94SFR 375-181-008 $14.94SFR 375-181-012 $14.94SFR 375-181-013 $14.94SFR 375-181-014 $14.94SFR 375-181-015 $14.94SFR 375-182-002 $14.94SFR 375-182-006 $14.94SFR 375-182-007 $14.94SFR 375-182-008 $14.94SFR 375-182-009 $14.94SFR 375-182-010 $14.94SFR 375-182-011 $14.94SFR 375-182-012 $14.94SFR 375-182-013 $14.94SFR 375-182-014 $14.94SFR 375-183-002 $14.94SFR 375-183-003 $14.94SFR 375-183-009 $14.94SFR 375-183-010 $14.94SFR 375-183-011 $14.94SFR 375-183-012 $14.94SFR 375-183-013 $14.94SFR 375-183-014 $14.94SFR 375-183-015 $14.94SFR 375-183-016 $14.94SFR 375-183-017 $29.88MFR2 375-183-018 $7.46VSFR 375-183-019 $14.94SFR 375-183-020 $29.88MFR2 375-183-021 $14.94SFR 375-183-022 $14.94SFR 375-183-023 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-183-024 $14.94SFR 375-191-002 $14.94SFR 375-191-003 $14.94SFR 375-191-004 $14.94SFR 375-191-005 $14.94SFR 375-191-006 $14.94SFR 375-191-007 $14.94SFR 375-191-008 $14.94SFR 375-191-009 $14.94SFR 375-191-010 $14.94SFR 375-191-011 $14.94SFR 375-192-001 $14.94SFR 375-192-002 $14.94SFR 375-192-003 $14.94SFR 375-192-004 $14.94SFR 375-192-005 $14.94SFR 375-192-006 $14.94SFR 375-192-007 $14.94SFR 375-192-009 $7.46VSFR 375-192-010 $14.94SFR 375-192-011 $14.94SFR 375-192-012 $14.94SFR 375-192-013 $14.94SFR 375-192-014 $14.94SFR 375-192-015 $14.94SFR 375-192-016 $14.94SFR 375-192-017 $14.94SFR 375-192-018 $14.94SFR 375-192-020 $14.94SFR 375-192-021 $14.94SFR 375-192-022 $14.94SFR 375-192-023 $7.46VSFR 375-192-024 $7.46VSFR 375-193-001 $14.94SFR 375-193-002 $14.94SFR 375-193-003 $14.94SFR 375-193-004 $14.94SFR 375-193-005 $14.94SFR 375-193-006 $14.94SFR 375-193-007 $14.94SFR 375-193-009 $14.94SFR 375-193-010 $14.94SFR 375-193-011 $14.94SFR 375-193-012 $14.94SFR 375-201-001 $14.94SFR 375-201-002 $14.94SFR 375-201-007 $14.94SFR 375-201-008 $14.94SFR 375-201-009 $14.94SFR 375-201-010 $14.94SFR 375-201-011 $14.94SFR 375-201-012 $14.94SFR - 173 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-201-013 $14.94SFR 375-201-014 $14.94SFR 375-201-015 $44.82MFR 375-201-016 $14.94SFR 375-201-017 $14.94SFR 375-201-018 $14.94SFR 375-201-019 $14.94SFR 375-201-020 $14.94SFR 375-201-021 $14.94SFR 375-202-001 $14.94SFR 375-202-002 $14.94SFR 375-202-003 $14.94SFR 375-202-004 $14.94SFR 375-202-005 $14.94SFR 375-202-006 $14.94SFR 375-202-007 $14.94SFR 375-202-008 $14.94SFR 375-202-009 $14.94SFR 375-202-010 $14.94SFR 375-202-011 $14.94SFR 375-202-012 $14.94SFR 375-202-013 $14.94SFR 375-202-014 $14.94SFR 375-202-015 $14.94SFR 375-203-001 $14.94SFR 375-203-002 $14.94SFR 375-203-003 $14.94SFR 375-203-004 $14.94SFR 375-203-005 $14.94SFR 375-203-006 $29.88MFR2 375-203-007 $14.94SFR 375-203-008 $14.94SFR 375-203-009 $14.94SFR 375-203-010 $14.94SFR 375-211-001 $74.70COM 375-211-002 $14.94SFR 375-211-003 $14.94SFR 375-211-004 $14.94SFR 375-211-005 $14.94SFR 375-211-006 $14.94SFR 375-211-007 $14.94SFR 375-211-008 $14.94SFR 375-211-009 $14.94SFR 375-211-010 $14.94SFR 375-211-011 $29.88MFR2 375-211-012 $29.88MFR2 375-211-013 $29.88MFR2 375-211-014 $14.94SFR 375-211-015 $14.94SFR 375-211-016 $29.88MFR2 375-211-017 $14.94SFR 375-211-018 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-211-019 $14.94SFR 375-211-020 $14.94SFR 375-212-001 $14.94SFR 375-212-003 $7.46VMFR 375-212-004 $14.94SFR 375-212-005 $14.94SFR 375-212-006 $7.46VSFR 375-212-007 $14.94SFR 375-212-008 $14.94SFR 375-212-009 $14.94SFR 375-212-010 $14.94SFR 375-212-011 $14.94SFR 375-212-012 $14.94SFR 375-212-013 $14.94SFR 375-212-014 $14.94SFR 375-212-015 $14.94SFR 375-212-016 $14.94SFR 375-212-019 $74.70COM 375-213-001 $14.94SFR 375-213-002 $14.94SFR 375-213-003 $14.94SFR 375-213-004 $14.94SFR 375-213-005 $14.94SFR 375-213-006 $14.94SFR 375-213-007 $14.94SFR 375-213-010 $14.94SFR 375-213-011 $14.94SFR 375-213-012 $14.94SFR 375-213-013 $14.94SFR 375-213-014 $14.94SFR 375-213-015 $14.94SFR 375-213-016 $14.94SFR 375-213-017 $14.94SFR 375-214-001 $14.94SFR 375-214-002 $14.94SFR 375-214-006 $14.94SFR 375-214-008 $14.94SFR 375-214-009 $14.94SFR 375-214-010 $14.94SFR 375-214-011 $14.94SFR 375-214-012 $14.94SFR 375-214-013 $14.94SFR 375-214-014 $14.94SFR 375-214-015 $14.94SFR 375-214-016 $14.94SFR 375-214-017 $14.94SFR 375-214-018 $14.94SFR 375-214-020 $14.94SFR 375-214-021 $14.94SFR 375-221-001 $14.94SFR 375-221-002 $14.94SFR 375-221-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-221-006 $14.94SFR 375-221-007 $29.88MFR2 375-221-008 $14.94SFR 375-221-009 $14.94SFR 375-221-010 $14.94SFR 375-221-011 $14.94SFR 375-221-012 $14.94SFR 375-221-013 $14.94SFR 375-221-014 $14.94SFR 375-221-016 $14.94SFR 375-221-017 $14.94SFR 375-221-018 $14.94SFR 375-221-021 $14.94SFR 375-221-022 $74.70COM 375-221-023 $14.94SFR 375-221-024 $29.88MFR2 375-221-025 $14.94SFR 375-221-026 $14.94SFR 375-222-001 $14.94SFR 375-222-002 $14.94SFR 375-222-003 $14.94SFR 375-222-004 $14.94SFR 375-222-005 $14.94SFR 375-222-006 $14.94SFR 375-231-001 $14.94SFR 375-231-002 $14.94SFR 375-231-003 $14.94SFR 375-231-004 $14.94SFR 375-231-005 $14.94SFR 375-231-006 $44.82MFR 375-231-007 $14.94SFR 375-231-009 $14.94SFR 375-231-010 $14.94SFR 375-231-011 $14.94SFR 375-231-012 $14.94SFR 375-231-013 $14.94SFR 375-231-014 $7.46VSFR 375-231-015 $14.94SFR 375-232-001 $29.88MFR2 375-232-002 $29.88MFR2 375-232-003 $29.88MFR2 375-232-004 $29.88MFR2 375-232-005 $14.94SFR 375-232-006 $14.94SFR 375-232-007 $14.94SFR 375-232-008 $14.94SFR 375-232-009 $14.94SFR 375-241-001 $14.94SFR 375-241-002 $7.46VSFR 375-241-003 $7.46VSFR 375-241-004 $14.94SFR 375-241-005 $14.94SFR - 174 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-241-006 $14.94SFR 375-241-007 $14.94SFR 375-242-001 $44.82MFR 375-242-002 $14.94SFR 375-242-003 $14.94SFR 375-242-004 $59.76MFR4 375-242-005 $14.94SFR 375-242-006 $14.94SFR 375-242-007 $14.94SFR 375-242-008 $44.82MFR 375-242-009 $14.94SFR 375-242-010 $14.94SFR 375-242-011 $14.94SFR 375-242-012 $14.94SFR 375-242-013 $14.94SFR 375-242-014 $14.94SFR 375-242-015 $14.94SFR 375-242-016 $14.94SFR 375-242-017 $14.94SFR 375-243-003 $44.82MFR 375-243-004 $7.46VCOM 375-243-005 $7.46VCOM 375-243-006 $7.46VCOM 375-243-007 $7.46VCOM 375-243-008 $7.46VCOM 375-243-009 $14.94SFR 375-243-010 $14.94SFR 375-243-011 $29.88MFR2 375-243-012 $74.70COM 375-244-001 $14.94SFR 375-244-002 $14.94SFR 375-244-003 $14.94SFR 375-244-004 $29.88MFR2 375-244-005 $59.76MFR4 375-244-006 $14.94SFR 375-244-007 $14.94SFR 375-244-008 $14.94SFR 375-251-001 $14.94SFR 375-251-002 $14.94SFR 375-251-003 $14.94SFR 375-251-004 $14.94SFR 375-251-005 $14.94SFR 375-251-006 $14.94SFR 375-251-007 $14.94SFR 375-251-008 $14.94SFR 375-251-009 $14.94SFR 375-252-001 $14.94SFR 375-252-002 $14.94SFR 375-252-003 $14.94SFR 375-252-004 $14.94SFR 375-252-005 $14.94SFR 375-252-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-252-009 $14.94SFR 375-252-010 $14.94SFR 375-252-011 $14.94SFR 375-252-012 $14.94SFR 375-252-013 $14.94SFR 375-252-014 $59.76MFR4 375-252-015 $14.94SFR 375-252-016 $14.94SFR 375-252-017 $14.94SFR 375-252-018 $14.94SFR 375-252-019 $14.94SFR 375-253-001 $14.94SFR 375-253-002 $14.94SFR 375-253-003 $14.94SFR 375-253-004 $14.94SFR 375-253-005 $14.94SFR 375-253-006 $14.94SFR 375-253-007 $14.94SFR 375-253-008 $14.94SFR 375-254-001 $14.94SFR 375-254-002 $29.88MFR2 375-254-003 $14.94SFR 375-254-004 $14.94SFR 375-254-005 $14.94SFR 375-254-007 $14.94SFR 375-254-008 $14.94SFR 375-254-009 $14.94SFR 375-254-010 $14.94SFR 375-254-011 $14.94SFR 375-254-012 $14.94SFR 375-254-013 $14.94SFR 375-254-014 $14.94SFR 375-254-015 $14.94SFR 375-254-016 $14.94SFR 375-254-017 $14.94SFR 375-254-018 $14.94SFR 375-254-019 $14.94SFR 375-254-020 $14.94SFR 375-256-006 $74.70MFR5 375-256-011 $74.70MFR5 375-256-012 $74.70MFR5 375-256-013 $14.94SFR 375-256-014 $74.70MFR5 375-256-015 $74.70MFR5 375-256-016 $7.46VSFR 375-256-017 $7.46VSFR 375-256-018 $14.94SFR 375-256-019 $14.94SFR 375-256-020 $14.94SFR 375-256-021 $14.94SFR 375-256-023 $29.88MFR2 375-256-024 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-257-001 $14.94SFR 375-257-002 $29.88MFR2 375-257-003 $7.46VSFR 375-257-004 $14.94SFR 375-257-006 $14.94SFR 375-257-007 $14.94SFR 375-257-008 $14.94SFR 375-258-001 $29.88MFR2 375-258-002 $29.88MFR2 375-258-003 $14.94SFR 375-258-004 $14.94SFR 375-258-006 $14.94SFR 375-258-007 $14.94SFR 375-258-008 $14.94SFR 375-258-009 $14.94SFR 375-260-001 $14.94SFR 375-260-002 $14.94SFR 375-260-005 $14.94SFR 375-260-006 $14.94SFR 375-260-007 $14.94SFR 375-260-008 $14.94SFR 375-260-009 $14.94SFR 375-260-012 $44.82MFR 375-260-013 $14.94SFR 375-260-018 $14.94SFR 375-260-020 $14.94SFR 375-260-022 $14.94SFR 375-260-023 $14.94SFR 375-260-024 $14.94SFR 375-260-025 $14.94SFR 375-260-026 $14.94SFR 375-260-027 $14.94SFR 375-260-028 $14.94SFR 375-260-029 $14.94SFR 375-260-030 $14.94SFR 375-260-031 $14.94SFR 375-260-032 $14.94SFR 375-260-033 $14.94SFR 375-271-001 $14.94SFR 375-271-002 $14.94SFR 375-271-003 $14.94SFR 375-271-004 $14.94SFR 375-271-005 $14.94SFR 375-271-007 $7.46VSFR 375-271-008 $14.94SFR 375-271-009 $7.46VSFR 375-271-010 $14.94SFR 375-271-012 $14.94SFR 375-271-013 $14.94SFR 375-271-014 $14.94SFR 375-271-015 $14.94SFR 375-271-016 $14.94SFR - 175 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-271-017 $14.94SFR 375-271-018 $14.94SFR 375-271-020 $14.94SFR 375-271-021 $14.94SFR 375-271-022 $14.94SFR 375-271-023 $14.94SFR 375-271-024 $14.94SFR 375-272-002 $14.94SFR 375-272-003 $14.94SFR 375-272-004 $14.94SFR 375-272-005 $14.94SFR 375-272-006 $14.94SFR 375-272-007 $14.94SFR 375-272-008 $14.94SFR 375-272-009 $14.94SFR 375-272-010 $14.94SFR 375-272-011 $14.94SFR 375-272-012 $14.94SFR 375-272-013 $14.94SFR 375-272-014 $14.94SFR 375-272-015 $14.94SFR 375-272-016 $14.94SFR 375-272-017 $14.94SFR 375-273-001 $14.94SFR 375-273-002 $14.94SFR 375-273-003 $14.94SFR 375-273-004 $14.94SFR 375-273-005 $14.94SFR 375-273-006 $14.94SFR 375-273-007 $14.94SFR 375-273-008 $14.94SFR 375-273-009 $14.94SFR 375-273-010 $29.88MFR2 375-273-011 $14.94SFR 375-273-013 $14.94SFR 375-273-014 $14.94SFR 375-273-015 $14.94SFR 375-273-016 $14.94SFR 375-273-017 $14.94SFR 375-281-004 $14.94SFR 375-281-005 $14.94SFR 375-281-006 $14.94SFR 375-281-007 $14.94SFR 375-281-008 $14.94SFR 375-281-009 $14.94SFR 375-281-010 $14.94SFR 375-281-011 $14.94SFR 375-281-012 $14.94SFR 375-281-013 $14.94SFR 375-281-018 $14.94SFR 375-281-019 $14.94SFR 375-281-020 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-281-021 $59.76MFR4 375-281-022 $14.94SFR 375-281-023 $14.94SFR 375-281-024 $14.94SFR 375-282-002 $14.94SFR 375-282-003 $14.94SFR 375-282-004 $14.94SFR 375-282-006 $14.94SFR 375-282-007 $14.94SFR 375-282-008 $14.94SFR 375-282-009 $14.94SFR 375-282-010 $14.94SFR 375-282-011 $14.94SFR 375-282-012 $14.94SFR 375-282-013 $14.94SFR 375-282-014 $14.94SFR 375-282-015 $14.94SFR 375-282-016 $14.94SFR 375-282-017 $14.94SFR 375-282-018 $14.94SFR 375-282-019 $14.94SFR 375-283-001 $14.94SFR 375-283-002 $14.94SFR 375-283-003 $14.94SFR 375-283-004 $14.94SFR 375-283-005 $14.94SFR 375-283-006 $14.94SFR 375-283-008 $14.94SFR 375-283-009 $14.94SFR 375-283-010 $14.94SFR 375-283-011 $14.94SFR 375-283-012 $14.94SFR 375-283-013 $14.94SFR 375-283-014 $14.94SFR 375-283-015 $14.94SFR 375-283-016 $44.82MFR 375-283-017 $14.94SFR 375-283-018 $14.94SFR 375-284-001 $14.94SFR 375-284-002 $14.94SFR 375-284-003 $14.94SFR 375-284-004 $14.94SFR 375-284-005 $14.94SFR 375-284-006 $14.94SFR 375-284-007 $7.46VSFR 375-284-008 $14.94SFR 375-284-009 $14.94SFR 375-291-002 $14.94SFR 375-291-003 $14.94SFR 375-291-007 $14.94SFR 375-291-010 $14.94SFR 375-291-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-291-012 $14.94SFR 375-291-013 $14.94SFR 375-291-014 $14.94SFR 375-291-015 $14.94SFR 375-291-016 $14.94SFR 375-291-017 $14.94SFR 375-291-018 $14.94SFR 375-292-001 $14.94SFR 375-292-002 $14.94SFR 375-292-003 $14.94SFR 375-292-004 $14.94SFR 375-292-005 $14.94SFR 375-292-006 $14.94SFR 375-292-008 $14.94SFR 375-292-009 $14.94SFR 375-292-010 $29.88MFR2 375-292-011 $14.94SFR 375-292-012 $14.94SFR 375-292-013 $14.94SFR 375-293-001 $14.94SFR 375-293-002 $14.94SFR 375-293-003 $14.94SFR 375-293-004 $14.94SFR 375-293-005 $14.94SFR 375-293-006 $14.94SFR 375-293-007 $14.94SFR 375-293-008 $14.94SFR 375-293-009 $14.94SFR 375-293-010 $14.94SFR 375-293-011 $14.94SFR 375-294-001 $14.94SFR 375-294-004 $14.94SFR 375-294-007 $14.94SFR 375-294-010 $14.94SFR 375-294-011 $14.94SFR 375-294-013 $14.94SFR 375-294-014 $14.94SFR 375-294-015 $14.94SFR 375-294-016 $14.94SFR 375-294-018 $14.94SFR 375-294-019 $14.94SFR 375-294-020 $14.94SFR 375-294-021 $14.94SFR 375-295-001 $14.94SFR 375-295-002 $14.94SFR 375-295-003 $14.94SFR 375-295-006 $14.94SFR 375-295-007 $14.94SFR 375-295-008 $14.94SFR 375-295-009 $14.94SFR 375-295-010 $14.94SFR 375-295-011 $14.94SFR - 176 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-295-012 $14.94SFR 375-301-001 $14.94SFR 375-301-002 $14.94SFR 375-301-003 $14.94SFR 375-301-007 $14.94SFR 375-301-009 $14.94SFR 375-301-010 $14.94SFR 375-301-013 $14.94SFR 375-301-014 $7.46VSFR 375-301-015 $14.94SFR 375-301-016 $14.94SFR 375-301-017 $14.94SFR 375-301-018 $14.94SFR 375-301-019 $14.94SFR 375-301-020 $14.94SFR 375-301-023 $14.94SFR 375-301-024 $7.46VSFR 375-302-002 $14.94SFR 375-302-003 $14.94SFR 375-302-004 $14.94SFR 375-302-005 $14.94SFR 375-302-006 $14.94SFR 375-302-007 $14.94SFR 375-302-008 $14.94SFR 375-302-010 $74.70INST 375-302-013 $14.94SFR 375-302-014 $14.94SFR 375-302-019 $14.94SFR 375-302-020 $14.94SFR 375-302-021 $14.94SFR 375-311-001 $7.46VSFR 375-311-002 $14.94SFR 375-311-003 $7.46VSFR 375-311-005 $14.94SFR 375-311-006 $14.94SFR 375-311-010 $14.94SFR 375-311-016 $14.94SFR 375-311-017 $14.94SFR 375-311-019 $29.88MFR2 375-311-022 $14.94SFR 375-311-023 $14.94SFR 375-311-024 $14.94SFR 375-311-025 $14.94SFR 375-311-026 $29.88MFR2 375-311-027 $14.94SFR 375-311-028 $7.46VSFR 375-311-030 $14.94SFR 375-311-031 $14.94SFR 375-312-001 $14.94SFR 375-312-002 $14.94SFR 375-312-003 $14.94SFR 375-312-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 375-312-005 $14.94SFR 375-312-006 $14.94SFR 375-312-007 $14.94SFR 375-312-009 $14.94SFR 375-312-010 $14.94SFR 378-080-002 $74.70IND 378-091-003 $14.94SFR 378-091-004 $7.46VSFR 378-091-005 $29.88MFR2 378-091-006 $14.94SFR 378-091-007 $29.88MFR2 378-091-012 $74.70IND 378-091-013 $74.70COM 378-092-001 $14.94SFR 378-092-002 $74.70VIND 378-092-003 $74.70VIND 378-092-007 $14.94SFR 378-092-008 $29.88MFR2 378-092-012 $14.94SFR 378-092-013 $14.94SFR 378-092-015 $14.94SFR 378-092-016 $14.94SFR 378-092-017 $29.88MFR2 378-092-018 $74.70IND 378-092-019 $14.94SFR 378-092-020 $74.70COM 378-092-021 $74.70IND 378-092-022 $7.46VSFR 378-092-023 $7.46VSFR 378-092-024 $74.70COM 378-101-007 $74.70IND 378-102-003 $74.70IND 378-103-001 $74.70COM 378-103-011 $7.46VCOM 378-103-013 $74.70COM 378-103-015 $74.70COM 378-103-016 $7.46VCOM 378-110-014 $74.70IND 378-121-004 $74.70VIND 378-123-009 $74.70IND 378-130-005 $74.70VIND 378-130-006 $7.46VCOM 378-130-013 $74.70COM 378-130-014 $14.94SFR 378-130-019 $74.70COM 378-130-021 $74.70IND 378-140-014 $74.70IND 380-041-008 $74.70IND 380-041-009 $74.70IND 380-051-001 $74.70IND 380-051-002 $74.70IND 380-051-006 $44.82MFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-051-007 $14.94SFR 380-051-009 $14.94SFR 380-051-010 $14.94SFR 380-051-011 $14.94SFR 380-051-012 $14.94SFR 380-051-017 $14.94SFR 380-051-018 $14.94SFR 380-051-019 $14.94SFR 380-051-022 $59.76MFR4 380-051-023 $29.88MFR2 380-051-024 $29.88MFR2 380-051-026 $14.94SFR 380-051-031 $74.70IND 380-051-034 $74.70COM 380-051-040 $44.82MFR 380-051-046 $7.46VSFR 380-051-047 $14.94SFR 380-052-003 $74.70COM 380-061-014 $74.70INST 380-061-015 $14.94SFR 380-061-016 $74.70COM 380-062-014 $74.70COM 380-062-018 $74.70COM 380-070-001 $14.94SFR 380-070-002 $14.94SFR 380-070-006 $14.94SFR 380-070-007 $14.94SFR 380-070-008 $14.94SFR 380-070-016 $7.46VSFR 380-070-017 $14.94SFR 380-070-021 $14.94SFR 380-070-022 $14.94SFR 380-070-023 $14.94SFR 380-070-024 $14.94SFR 380-070-025 $14.94SFR 380-070-026 $14.94SFR 380-070-027 $14.94SFR 380-070-028 $14.94SFR 380-070-030 $14.94SFR 380-070-031 $14.94SFR 380-070-032 $14.94SFR 380-070-033 $14.94SFR 380-070-034 $14.94SFR 380-070-035 $7.46VSFR 380-070-036 $7.46VSFR 380-070-037 $7.46VSFR 380-070-038 $7.46VSFR 380-070-039 $7.46VSFR 380-070-040 $7.46VSFR 380-070-041 $7.46VSFR 380-070-042 $7.46VSFR 380-070-043 $7.46VSFR - 177 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-070-044 $7.46VSFR 380-080-002 $14.94SFR 380-080-003 $14.94SFR 380-080-006 $14.94SFR 380-080-010 $14.94SFR 380-080-011 $14.94SFR 380-080-012 $14.94SFR 380-080-013 $14.94SFR 380-080-014 $14.94SFR 380-080-015 $14.94SFR 380-080-016 $14.94SFR 380-080-017 $14.94SFR 380-080-018 $7.46VSFR 380-080-019 $7.46VSFR 380-080-021 $14.94SFR 380-080-023 $14.94SFR 380-080-024 $14.94SFR 380-080-025 $14.94SFR 380-080-026 $14.94SFR 380-080-028 $14.94SFR 380-080-029 $14.94SFR 380-080-030 $7.46VSFR 380-080-031 $7.46VSFR 380-080-032 $14.94SFR 380-080-033 $14.94SFR 380-080-034 $14.94SFR 380-080-035 $14.94SFR 380-080-037 $14.94SFR 380-080-038 $14.94SFR 380-080-039 $14.94SFR 380-080-040 $14.94SFR 380-080-041 $14.94SFR 380-080-042 $14.94SFR 380-080-044 $14.94SFR 380-080-045 $14.94SFR 380-080-046 $14.94SFR 380-080-047 $14.94SFR 380-080-048 $14.94SFR 380-080-049 $14.94SFR 380-080-050 $14.94SFR 380-080-051 $14.94SFR 380-080-052 $14.94SFR 380-080-053 $14.94SFR 380-080-054 $14.94SFR 380-080-055 $14.94SFR 380-080-056 $14.94SFR 380-080-057 $14.94SFR 380-090-001 $14.94SFR 380-090-002 $14.94SFR 380-090-004 $14.94SFR 380-090-005 $14.94SFR 380-090-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-090-007 $14.94SFR 380-090-008 $14.94SFR 380-090-009 $14.94SFR 380-090-010 $14.94SFR 380-090-011 $14.94SFR 380-090-012 $14.94SFR 380-090-013 $14.94SFR 380-090-014 $14.94SFR 380-090-015 $14.94SFR 380-101-001 $14.94SFR 380-101-002 $14.94SFR 380-101-003 $14.94SFR 380-101-004 $14.94SFR 380-101-005 $14.94SFR 380-101-006 $14.94SFR 380-101-007 $14.94SFR 380-101-008 $14.94SFR 380-101-009 $14.94SFR 380-101-010 $14.94SFR 380-101-011 $14.94SFR 380-101-012 $14.94SFR 380-101-013 $14.94SFR 380-101-014 $14.94SFR 380-101-015 $14.94SFR 380-101-016 $14.94SFR 380-101-017 $14.94SFR 380-101-020 $14.94SFR 380-101-021 $14.94SFR 380-101-022 $14.94SFR 380-101-023 $14.94SFR 380-101-024 $14.94SFR 380-101-025 $14.94SFR 380-101-026 $14.94SFR 380-101-027 $14.94SFR 380-101-028 $14.94SFR 380-101-029 $14.94SFR 380-101-030 $14.94SFR 380-101-037 $14.94SFR 380-101-039 $14.94SFR 380-101-040 $14.94SFR 380-101-041 $14.94SFR 380-101-042 $14.94SFR 380-101-043 $14.94SFR 380-101-044 $14.94SFR 380-101-045 $14.94SFR 380-101-046 $14.94SFR 380-101-047 $14.94SFR 380-102-001 $14.94SFR 380-102-002 $14.94SFR 380-102-003 $14.94SFR 380-102-004 $14.94SFR 380-102-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-102-006 $14.94SFR 380-103-001 $14.94SFR 380-103-002 $14.94SFR 380-103-003 $14.94SFR 380-104-001 $14.94SFR 380-104-002 $14.94SFR 380-104-003 $14.94SFR 380-104-004 $14.94SFR 380-104-005 $14.94SFR 380-104-006 $14.94SFR 380-104-007 $14.94SFR 380-104-008 $14.94SFR 380-104-009 $14.94SFR 380-104-010 $14.94SFR 380-104-011 $14.94SFR 380-104-012 $14.94SFR 380-104-013 $14.94SFR 380-104-014 $14.94SFR 380-104-015 $14.94SFR 380-104-016 $14.94SFR 380-104-017 $14.94SFR 380-104-018 $14.94SFR 380-104-019 $14.94SFR 380-104-020 $14.94SFR 380-104-021 $14.94SFR 380-104-022 $14.94SFR 380-104-023 $14.94SFR 380-104-024 $14.94SFR 380-111-001 $14.94SFR 380-111-002 $14.94SFR 380-111-003 $14.94SFR 380-111-004 $14.94SFR 380-111-005 $14.94SFR 380-111-006 $14.94SFR 380-111-007 $14.94SFR 380-111-008 $14.94SFR 380-111-009 $14.94SFR 380-111-010 $14.94SFR 380-111-011 $14.94SFR 380-111-012 $14.94SFR 380-111-013 $14.94SFR 380-111-014 $14.94SFR 380-111-015 $14.94SFR 380-111-016 $14.94SFR 380-111-017 $14.94SFR 380-111-018 $14.94SFR 380-111-019 $14.94SFR 380-111-020 $14.94SFR 380-111-021 $14.94SFR 380-111-022 $14.94SFR 380-111-023 $14.94SFR 380-111-024 $14.94SFR - 178 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-111-025 $14.94SFR 380-111-026 $14.94SFR 380-111-027 $14.94SFR 380-112-001 $14.94SFR 380-112-002 $14.94SFR 380-112-003 $14.94SFR 380-112-004 $14.94SFR 380-112-005 $14.94SFR 380-112-006 $14.94SFR 380-112-007 $14.94SFR 380-112-008 $14.94SFR 380-112-009 $14.94SFR 380-112-010 $14.94SFR 380-112-011 $14.94SFR 380-112-012 $14.94SFR 380-112-013 $14.94SFR 380-112-014 $14.94SFR 380-112-015 $14.94SFR 380-112-016 $14.94SFR 380-112-017 $14.94SFR 380-112-018 $14.94SFR 380-112-019 $14.94SFR 380-112-020 $14.94SFR 380-112-021 $14.94SFR 380-112-022 $14.94SFR 380-112-023 $14.94SFR 380-112-024 $14.94SFR 380-112-025 $14.94SFR 380-113-001 $14.94SFR 380-113-002 $14.94SFR 380-113-003 $14.94SFR 380-113-004 $14.94SFR 380-113-005 $14.94SFR 380-113-006 $14.94SFR 380-113-007 $14.94SFR 380-113-008 $14.94SFR 380-113-009 $14.94SFR 380-113-010 $14.94SFR 380-113-011 $14.94SFR 380-113-012 $14.94SFR 380-113-013 $14.94SFR 380-113-014 $14.94SFR 380-113-015 $14.94SFR 380-113-016 $14.94SFR 380-113-017 $14.94SFR 380-113-018 $14.94SFR 380-113-019 $14.94SFR 380-120-001 $14.94SFR 380-120-002 $14.94SFR 380-120-003 $14.94SFR 380-120-004 $14.94SFR 380-120-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-120-007 $14.94SFR 380-120-008 $14.94SFR 380-120-009 $14.94SFR 380-120-010 $14.94SFR 380-120-011 $14.94SFR 380-120-013 $14.94SFR 380-120-014 $14.94SFR 380-120-019 $14.94SFR 380-120-021 $14.94SFR 380-120-022 $14.94SFR 380-120-023 $14.94SFR 380-120-026 $14.94SFR 380-120-027 $14.94SFR 380-120-028 $74.70COM 380-120-029 $14.94SFR 380-120-030 $14.94SFR 380-120-031 $14.94SFR 380-120-032 $14.94SFR 380-120-033 $14.94SFR 380-120-034 $14.94SFR 380-120-035 $14.94SFR 380-120-036 $14.94SFR 380-120-037 $14.94SFR 380-120-038 $14.94SFR 380-120-039 $14.94SFR 380-120-040 $7.46VSFR 380-120-042 $14.94SFR 380-120-044 $14.94SFR 380-120-045 $14.94SFR 380-120-050 $14.94SFR 380-120-053 $14.94SFR 380-120-054 $14.94SFR 380-120-055 $14.94SFR 380-120-056 $14.94SFR 380-120-057 $14.94SFR 380-120-058 $14.94SFR 380-120-059 $14.94SFR 380-120-060 $7.46VSFR 380-120-061 $7.46VSFR 380-120-065 $14.94SFR 380-120-066 $7.46VSFR 380-120-068 $14.94SFR 380-120-069 $14.94SFR 380-120-070 $14.94SFR 380-120-071 $14.94SFR 380-120-072 $14.94SFR 380-120-073 $14.94SFR 380-120-074 $14.94SFR 380-120-075 $14.94SFR 380-120-076 $14.94SFR 380-120-077 $14.94SFR 380-120-078 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-120-079 $14.94SFR 380-120-080 $14.94SFR 380-120-081 $14.94SFR 380-120-082 $14.94SFR 380-120-083 $14.94SFR 380-120-084 $14.94SFR 380-120-085 $14.94SFR 380-120-086 $14.94SFR 380-120-087 $7.46VSFR 380-120-088 $7.46VSFR 380-120-089 $14.94SFR 380-120-090 $14.94SFR 380-131-001 $14.94SFR 380-131-002 $14.94SFR 380-131-003 $14.94SFR 380-131-004 $14.94SFR 380-131-005 $14.94SFR 380-131-006 $14.94SFR 380-131-007 $14.94SFR 380-131-008 $14.94SFR 380-131-009 $14.94SFR 380-131-010 $14.94SFR 380-131-011 $14.94SFR 380-131-012 $14.94SFR 380-131-013 $14.94SFR 380-131-014 $14.94SFR 380-131-015 $14.94SFR 380-131-016 $14.94SFR 380-131-017 $14.94SFR 380-131-018 $14.94SFR 380-131-019 $14.94SFR 380-131-020 $14.94SFR 380-132-001 $14.94SFR 380-132-002 $14.94SFR 380-132-003 $14.94SFR 380-132-004 $14.94SFR 380-132-005 $14.94SFR 380-132-006 $14.94SFR 380-132-007 $14.94SFR 380-132-008 $14.94SFR 380-132-009 $14.94SFR 380-132-010 $14.94SFR 380-132-011 $14.94SFR 380-132-012 $14.94SFR 380-132-013 $14.94SFR 380-132-014 $14.94SFR 380-132-015 $14.94SFR 380-132-016 $14.94SFR 380-132-017 $14.94SFR 380-132-018 $14.94SFR 380-132-019 $14.94SFR 380-132-020 $14.94SFR - 179 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-132-021 $14.94SFR 380-141-001 $14.94SFR 380-141-002 $14.94SFR 380-141-003 $14.94SFR 380-141-004 $14.94SFR 380-141-005 $14.94SFR 380-141-006 $14.94SFR 380-141-007 $14.94SFR 380-141-008 $14.94SFR 380-141-009 $14.94SFR 380-141-010 $14.94SFR 380-141-011 $14.94SFR 380-141-012 $14.94SFR 380-141-013 $14.94SFR 380-141-014 $14.94SFR 380-141-015 $14.94SFR 380-141-016 $14.94SFR 380-141-017 $14.94SFR 380-141-018 $14.94SFR 380-141-019 $14.94SFR 380-141-020 $14.94SFR 380-141-021 $14.94SFR 380-141-022 $14.94SFR 380-141-023 $14.94SFR 380-141-024 $14.94SFR 380-141-025 $14.94SFR 380-141-026 $14.94SFR 380-141-027 $14.94SFR 380-142-001 $14.94SFR 380-142-002 $14.94SFR 380-142-003 $14.94SFR 380-142-004 $14.94SFR 380-142-005 $14.94SFR 380-142-006 $14.94SFR 380-142-007 $14.94SFR 380-142-008 $14.94SFR 380-142-009 $14.94SFR 380-142-010 $14.94SFR 380-142-011 $14.94SFR 380-142-012 $14.94SFR 380-142-013 $14.94SFR 380-142-014 $14.94SFR 380-142-015 $14.94SFR 380-142-016 $14.94SFR 380-143-001 $14.94SFR 380-143-002 $14.94SFR 380-143-003 $14.94SFR 380-143-004 $14.94SFR 380-143-005 $14.94SFR 380-143-006 $14.94SFR 380-143-007 $14.94SFR 380-143-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-143-009 $14.94SFR 380-143-010 $14.94SFR 380-143-011 $14.94SFR 380-143-012 $14.94SFR 380-143-013 $14.94SFR 380-143-014 $14.94SFR 380-143-015 $14.94SFR 380-143-016 $14.94SFR 380-143-017 $14.94SFR 380-143-018 $14.94SFR 380-143-019 $14.94SFR 380-143-020 $14.94SFR 380-143-021 $14.94SFR 380-143-022 $14.94SFR 380-143-023 $14.94SFR 380-143-024 $14.94SFR 380-143-025 $14.94SFR 380-151-001 $14.94SFR 380-151-002 $14.94SFR 380-151-003 $14.94SFR 380-151-004 $14.94SFR 380-151-005 $14.94SFR 380-151-006 $14.94SFR 380-151-007 $14.94SFR 380-151-008 $14.94SFR 380-152-001 $14.94SFR 380-152-002 $14.94SFR 380-152-003 $14.94SFR 380-152-004 $14.94SFR 380-152-005 $14.94SFR 380-152-006 $14.94SFR 380-152-007 $14.94SFR 380-152-008 $14.94SFR 380-152-009 $14.94SFR 380-152-010 $14.94SFR 380-152-011 $14.94SFR 380-152-012 $14.94SFR 380-152-013 $14.94SFR 380-152-014 $14.94SFR 380-152-015 $14.94SFR 380-152-016 $14.94SFR 380-152-017 $14.94SFR 380-152-018 $14.94SFR 380-152-019 $14.94SFR 380-152-020 $14.94SFR 380-152-021 $14.94SFR 380-152-022 $14.94SFR 380-170-003 $14.94SFR 380-170-005 $74.70IND 380-170-008 $14.94SFR 380-170-009 $14.94SFR 380-170-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-170-011 $14.94SFR 380-170-012 $14.94SFR 380-170-013 $14.94SFR 380-170-014 $14.94SFR 380-170-015 $14.94SFR 380-170-016 $14.94SFR 380-170-017 $14.94SFR 380-170-018 $14.94SFR 380-170-019 $14.94SFR 380-170-020 $14.94SFR 380-170-021 $14.94SFR 380-170-022 $14.94SFR 380-170-023 $14.94SFR 380-170-024 $14.94SFR 380-170-025 $14.94SFR 380-170-026 $14.94SFR 380-170-027 $14.94SFR 380-170-028 $14.94SFR 380-170-029 $14.94SFR 380-170-030 $14.94SFR 380-180-002 $14.94SFR 380-180-003 $14.94SFR 380-180-005 $14.94SFR 380-180-006 $14.94SFR 380-180-008 $14.94SFR 380-180-009 $14.94SFR 380-180-010 $14.94SFR 380-180-011 $14.94SFR 380-180-012 $14.94SFR 380-180-013 $14.94SFR 380-180-014 $14.94SFR 380-180-015 $14.94SFR 380-180-016 $14.94SFR 380-180-018 $14.94SFR 380-180-019 $14.94SFR 380-180-020 $14.94SFR 380-180-021 $14.94SFR 380-180-022 $14.94SFR 380-180-023 $14.94SFR 380-180-024 $14.94SFR 380-180-025 $14.94SFR 380-180-027 $14.94SFR 380-180-028 $14.94SFR 380-180-029 $14.94SFR 380-180-030 $14.94SFR 380-180-031 $14.94SFR 380-180-032 $14.94SFR 380-180-034 $89.64MFR6 380-180-042 $29.88MFR2 380-180-043 $29.88MFR2 380-180-044 $29.88MFR2 380-180-050 $14.94SFR - 180 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-180-054 $14.94SFR 380-180-056 $29.88MFR2 380-180-057 $29.88MFR2 380-180-058 $14.94SFR 380-180-063 $74.70COM 380-180-067 $74.70IND 380-180-068 $74.70COM 380-180-070 $74.70COM 380-180-071 $14.94SFR 380-180-072 $14.94SFR 380-180-073 $14.94SFR 380-180-074 $14.94SFR 380-180-075 $14.94SFR 380-180-076 $14.94SFR 380-180-077 $14.94SFR 380-180-078 $14.94SFR 380-180-079 $14.94SFR 380-180-080 $14.94SFR 380-180-081 $14.94SFR 380-180-082 $14.94SFR 380-180-083 $14.94SFR 380-180-084 $14.94SFR 380-180-085 $14.94SFR 380-180-086 $14.94SFR 380-180-087 $14.94SFR 380-180-088 $14.94SFR 380-180-089 $14.94SFR 380-180-090 $14.94SFR 380-180-092 $14.94SFR 380-180-093 $74.70IND 380-191-001 $14.94SFR 380-191-002 $14.94SFR 380-191-003 $14.94SFR 380-191-004 $14.94SFR 380-191-005 $14.94SFR 380-191-006 $29.88MFR2 380-191-008 $14.94SFR 380-191-009 $14.94SFR 380-191-010 $14.94SFR 380-191-011 $14.94SFR 380-192-001 $14.94SFR 380-192-002 $14.94SFR 380-192-003 $14.94SFR 380-192-004 $14.94SFR 380-192-005 $14.94SFR 380-192-006 $14.94SFR 380-192-007 $14.94SFR 380-192-008 $14.94SFR 380-192-009 $14.94SFR 380-192-010 $14.94SFR 380-192-011 $14.94SFR 380-192-012 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-192-013 $14.94SFR 380-193-001 $14.94SFR 380-193-002 $14.94SFR 380-193-003 $14.94SFR 380-193-004 $14.94SFR 380-193-005 $14.94SFR 380-193-006 $14.94SFR 380-193-007 $14.94SFR 380-193-008 $14.94SFR 380-193-009 $14.94SFR 380-193-010 $14.94SFR 380-193-011 $14.94SFR 380-193-012 $14.94SFR 380-193-013 $14.94SFR 380-193-014 $14.94SFR 380-193-015 $14.94SFR 380-193-016 $14.94SFR 380-193-017 $14.94SFR 380-193-018 $14.94SFR 380-193-019 $14.94SFR 380-193-020 $14.94SFR 380-193-021 $14.94SFR 380-193-022 $29.88MFR2 380-193-024 $14.94SFR 380-193-025 $14.94SFR 380-193-029 $44.82MFR 380-193-031 $74.70MFR5 380-193-032 $74.70COM 380-194-001 $14.94SFR 380-194-002 $14.94SFR 380-194-003 $14.94SFR 380-194-004 $7.46VSFR 380-194-005 $14.94SFR 380-194-009 $14.94SFR 380-194-010 $7.46VMFR 380-194-011 $89.64MFR6 380-195-001 $14.94SFR 380-195-004 $14.94SFR 380-195-005 $14.94SFR 380-195-006 $14.94SFR 380-195-011 $29.88MFR2 380-195-021 $14.94SFR 380-195-030 $14.94SFR 380-195-031 $14.94SFR 380-195-032 $14.94SFR 380-195-033 $14.94SFR 380-195-034 $14.94SFR 380-195-035 $74.70MFR5 380-201-001 $14.94SFR 380-201-002 $14.94SFR 380-201-003 $14.94SFR 380-201-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-201-005 $14.94SFR 380-201-006 $14.94SFR 380-201-007 $14.94SFR 380-201-008 $14.94SFR 380-201-009 $14.94SFR 380-201-010 $14.94SFR 380-202-001 $14.94SFR 380-202-002 $14.94SFR 380-202-003 $14.94SFR 380-202-004 $14.94SFR 380-202-005 $14.94SFR 380-202-007 $14.94SFR 380-202-008 $14.94SFR 380-202-009 $14.94SFR 380-202-010 $14.94SFR 380-202-011 $14.94SFR 380-202-012 $14.94SFR 380-202-013 $14.94SFR 380-202-014 $14.94SFR 380-202-015 $14.94SFR 380-202-016 $14.94SFR 380-202-017 $14.94SFR 380-202-018 $14.94SFR 380-202-019 $14.94SFR 380-202-020 $14.94SFR 380-202-021 $14.94SFR 380-202-022 $14.94SFR 380-202-023 $14.94SFR 380-202-024 $14.94SFR 380-202-025 $14.94SFR 380-202-026 $14.94SFR 380-202-027 $14.94SFR 380-202-028 $14.94SFR 380-202-029 $14.94SFR 380-202-030 $14.94SFR 380-202-031 $14.94SFR 380-202-032 $14.94SFR 380-202-033 $14.94SFR 380-202-034 $14.94SFR 380-202-035 $14.94SFR 380-202-036 $14.94SFR 380-202-037 $14.94SFR 380-202-038 $14.94SFR 380-202-039 $14.94SFR 380-202-040 $14.94SFR 380-202-041 $14.94SFR 380-202-042 $14.94SFR 380-202-043 $14.94SFR 380-202-044 $14.94SFR 380-202-045 $14.94SFR 380-202-046 $14.94SFR 380-210-002 $74.70IND - 181 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-210-004 $74.70IND 380-210-005 $14.94SFR 380-210-006 $14.94SFR 380-210-007 $14.94SFR 380-210-008 $14.94SFR 380-210-009 $14.94SFR 380-210-010 $14.94SFR 380-210-011 $14.94SFR 380-210-012 $14.94SFR 380-210-013 $14.94SFR 380-210-014 $14.94SFR 380-210-015 $14.94SFR 380-210-016 $14.94SFR 380-210-017 $14.94SFR 380-210-018 $14.94SFR 380-210-019 $14.94SFR 380-210-020 $14.94SFR 380-210-021 $14.94SFR 380-210-022 $14.94SFR 380-210-024 $14.94SFR 380-210-025 $14.94SFR 380-210-026 $14.94SFR 380-210-027 $14.94SFR 380-210-028 $14.94SFR 380-211-001 $14.94SFR 380-211-002 $14.94SFR 380-211-003 $14.94SFR 380-211-004 $14.94SFR 380-211-005 $14.94SFR 380-211-006 $14.94SFR 380-211-007 $14.94SFR 380-211-008 $14.94SFR 380-211-009 $14.94SFR 380-211-010 $14.94SFR 380-211-011 $14.94SFR 380-211-012 $14.94SFR 380-220-011 $29.88MFR2 380-220-012 $29.88MFR2 380-220-013 $14.94SFR 380-220-014 $14.94SFR 380-220-015 $14.94SFR 380-220-016 $14.94SFR 380-220-017 $14.94SFR 380-220-018 $14.94SFR 380-220-019 $14.94SFR 380-220-020 $14.94SFR 380-220-021 $14.94SFR 380-220-022 $14.94SFR 380-220-023 $14.94SFR 380-220-026 $14.94SFR 380-220-027 $14.94SFR 380-220-028 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-220-029 $14.94SFR 380-220-030 $14.94SFR 380-220-031 $14.94SFR 380-220-032 $14.94SFR 380-220-033 $14.94SFR 380-220-034 $14.94SFR 380-220-035 $14.94SFR 380-220-036 $14.94SFR 380-220-038 $14.94SFR 380-220-040 $14.94SFR 380-220-041 $14.94SFR 380-220-042 $14.94SFR 380-220-043 $14.94SFR 380-220-044 $14.94SFR 380-220-046 $14.94SFR 380-220-047 $14.94SFR 380-220-048 $7.46CONDO 380-220-049 $7.46CONDO 380-220-050 $7.46CONDO 380-220-051 $7.46CONDO 380-220-052 $7.46CONDO 380-220-053 $7.46CONDO 380-220-054 $7.46CONDO 380-220-055 $7.46CONDO 380-220-056 $7.46CONDO 380-220-057 $7.46CONDO 380-220-058 $7.46CONDO 380-220-059 $7.46CONDO 380-220-061 $14.94SFR 380-220-064 $14.94SFR 380-220-065 $14.94SFR 380-220-066 $7.46VMFR 380-220-067 $74.70MFR5 380-231-004 $74.70COM 380-231-005 $14.94SFR 380-231-006 $14.94SFR 380-231-009 $14.94SFR 380-231-010 $14.94SFR 380-231-011 $14.94SFR 380-231-020 $7.46VSFR 380-231-021 $14.94SFR 380-231-029 $14.94SFR 380-231-030 $14.94SFR 380-231-031 $14.94SFR 380-231-032 $14.94SFR 380-231-033 $14.94SFR 380-231-035 $14.94SFR 380-231-036 $14.94SFR 380-231-037 $14.94SFR 380-231-038 $14.94SFR 380-231-039 $14.94SFR 380-231-040 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 380-232-001 $14.94SFR 380-232-002 $14.94SFR 380-232-003 $14.94SFR 380-232-004 $14.94SFR 380-232-005 $14.94SFR 380-232-006 $14.94SFR 380-232-007 $14.94SFR 380-232-008 $14.94SFR 380-232-009 $14.94SFR 380-232-010 $14.94SFR 380-232-011 $14.94SFR 380-232-015 $14.94SFR 380-232-016 $14.94SFR 380-232-017 $74.70COM 380-240-004 $74.70IND 380-240-005 $74.70COM 380-240-010 $74.70COM 380-240-011 $74.70IND 380-250-001 $7.46CONDO 380-250-002 $7.46CONDO 380-250-003 $7.46CONDO 380-250-004 $7.46CONDO 380-250-005 $7.46CONDO 380-250-006 $7.46CONDO 380-250-007 $7.46CONDO 380-250-008 $7.46CONDO 380-250-009 $7.46CONDO 380-250-010 $7.46CONDO 380-250-011 $7.46CONDO 380-250-012 $7.46CONDO 380-250-013 $7.46CONDO 380-250-014 $7.46CONDO 380-250-015 $7.46CONDO 380-250-016 $7.46CONDO 380-250-017 $7.46CONDO 380-250-018 $7.46CONDO 380-250-019 $7.46CONDO 380-250-020 $7.46CONDO 380-250-021 $7.46CONDO 380-250-022 $7.46CONDO 380-250-023 $7.46CONDO 380-250-024 $7.46CONDO 403-091-001 $14.94SFR 403-091-002 $14.94SFR 403-091-003 $14.94SFR 403-091-004 $14.94SFR 403-091-005 $14.94SFR 403-091-006 $14.94SFR 403-091-007 $14.94SFR 403-091-008 $14.94SFR 403-092-001 $14.94SFR 403-092-002 $14.94SFR - 182 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-092-003 $14.94SFR 403-092-004 $14.94SFR 403-092-005 $14.94SFR 403-092-006 $14.94SFR 403-092-007 $14.94SFR 403-092-008 $14.94SFR 403-093-001 $14.94SFR 403-093-002 $14.94SFR 403-093-003 $14.94SFR 403-094-001 $14.94SFR 403-094-002 $14.94SFR 403-094-003 $14.94SFR 403-094-004 $14.94SFR 403-094-005 $14.94SFR 403-094-006 $14.94SFR 403-094-007 $14.94SFR 403-094-008 $14.94SFR 403-094-009 $14.94SFR 403-094-010 $14.94SFR 403-094-011 $14.94SFR 403-094-012 $14.94SFR 403-094-013 $14.94SFR 403-094-014 $14.94SFR 403-094-015 $14.94SFR 403-094-016 $14.94SFR 403-094-017 $14.94SFR 403-094-018 $14.94SFR 403-094-019 $14.94SFR 403-094-020 $14.94SFR 403-094-021 $14.94SFR 403-094-022 $14.94SFR 403-094-023 $14.94SFR 403-094-024 $14.94SFR 403-094-025 $14.94SFR 403-094-026 $14.94SFR 403-094-027 $14.94SFR 403-094-028 $14.94SFR 403-094-029 $14.94SFR 403-094-030 $14.94SFR 403-094-031 $14.94SFR 403-094-032 $14.94SFR 403-094-033 $14.94SFR 403-121-001 $14.94SFR 403-121-002 $14.94SFR 403-121-003 $14.94SFR 403-121-004 $14.94SFR 403-121-005 $14.94SFR 403-121-006 $14.94SFR 403-121-007 $14.94SFR 403-121-008 $14.94SFR 403-121-009 $14.94SFR 403-121-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-121-011 $14.94SFR 403-121-012 $14.94SFR 403-121-013 $14.94SFR 403-122-001 $14.94SFR 403-122-002 $14.94SFR 403-122-003 $14.94SFR 403-122-004 $14.94SFR 403-122-005 $14.94SFR 403-122-006 $14.94SFR 403-122-007 $14.94SFR 403-122-008 $14.94SFR 403-122-009 $14.94SFR 403-122-010 $14.94SFR 403-122-011 $14.94SFR 403-122-012 $14.94SFR 403-122-013 $14.94SFR 403-122-014 $14.94SFR 403-122-015 $14.94SFR 403-122-016 $14.94SFR 403-122-017 $14.94SFR 403-122-018 $14.94SFR 403-122-019 $14.94SFR 403-122-020 $14.94SFR 403-122-021 $14.94SFR 403-122-022 $14.94SFR 403-122-023 $14.94SFR 403-123-001 $14.94SFR 403-123-002 $14.94SFR 403-123-003 $14.94SFR 403-123-004 $14.94SFR 403-123-005 $14.94SFR 403-123-006 $14.94SFR 403-123-007 $14.94SFR 403-123-008 $14.94SFR 403-123-009 $14.94SFR 403-123-010 $14.94SFR 403-123-011 $14.94SFR 403-123-012 $14.94SFR 403-123-013 $14.94SFR 403-123-014 $14.94SFR 403-123-015 $14.94SFR 403-123-016 $14.94SFR 403-123-017 $14.94SFR 403-123-018 $14.94SFR 403-123-019 $14.94SFR 403-123-020 $14.94SFR 403-123-021 $14.94SFR 403-123-022 $14.94SFR 403-123-023 $14.94SFR 403-123-024 $14.94SFR 403-124-001 $14.94SFR 403-124-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-124-003 $14.94SFR 403-124-004 $14.94SFR 403-124-005 $14.94SFR 403-124-006 $14.94SFR 403-124-007 $14.94SFR 403-124-008 $14.94SFR 403-124-009 $14.94SFR 403-124-010 $14.94SFR 403-124-011 $14.94SFR 403-124-012 $14.94SFR 403-124-013 $14.94SFR 403-124-014 $14.94SFR 403-124-015 $14.94SFR 403-124-016 $14.94SFR 403-124-017 $14.94SFR 403-124-018 $14.94SFR 403-124-019 $14.94SFR 403-124-020 $14.94SFR 403-124-021 $14.94SFR 403-124-022 $14.94SFR 403-124-023 $14.94SFR 403-124-024 $14.94SFR 403-124-025 $14.94SFR 403-124-026 $14.94SFR 403-124-027 $14.94SFR 403-124-028 $14.94SFR 403-131-001 $14.94SFR 403-131-002 $14.94SFR 403-131-003 $14.94SFR 403-131-004 $14.94SFR 403-131-005 $14.94SFR 403-131-006 $14.94SFR 403-131-007 $14.94SFR 403-131-008 $14.94SFR 403-131-009 $14.94SFR 403-131-010 $14.94SFR 403-131-011 $14.94SFR 403-131-012 $14.94SFR 403-131-013 $14.94SFR 403-131-014 $14.94SFR 403-131-015 $14.94SFR 403-131-016 $14.94SFR 403-131-017 $14.94SFR 403-131-018 $14.94SFR 403-131-019 $14.94SFR 403-131-020 $14.94SFR 403-131-021 $14.94SFR 403-131-022 $14.94SFR 403-131-023 $14.94SFR 403-131-024 $14.94SFR 403-131-025 $14.94SFR 403-131-026 $14.94SFR - 183 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-132-001 $14.94SFR 403-132-002 $14.94SFR 403-132-003 $14.94SFR 403-132-004 $14.94SFR 403-132-005 $14.94SFR 403-132-006 $14.94SFR 403-132-007 $14.94SFR 403-132-008 $14.94SFR 403-132-009 $14.94SFR 403-132-010 $14.94SFR 403-132-011 $14.94SFR 403-132-012 $14.94SFR 403-132-013 $14.94SFR 403-132-014 $14.94SFR 403-132-015 $14.94SFR 403-132-016 $14.94SFR 403-132-017 $14.94SFR 403-132-018 $14.94SFR 403-132-019 $14.94SFR 403-132-020 $14.94SFR 403-132-021 $14.94SFR 403-132-022 $14.94SFR 403-133-001 $14.94SFR 403-133-002 $14.94SFR 403-133-003 $14.94SFR 403-133-004 $14.94SFR 403-133-005 $14.94SFR 403-133-006 $14.94SFR 403-133-007 $14.94SFR 403-133-008 $14.94SFR 403-133-009 $14.94SFR 403-133-010 $14.94SFR 403-133-011 $14.94SFR 403-141-003 $14.94SFR 403-141-004 $14.94SFR 403-141-005 $14.94SFR 403-142-001 $14.94SFR 403-142-002 $14.94SFR 403-142-003 $14.94SFR 403-142-004 $14.94SFR 403-142-005 $14.94SFR 403-142-006 $14.94SFR 403-142-007 $14.94SFR 403-142-008 $14.94SFR 403-142-009 $14.94SFR 403-143-001 $14.94SFR 403-143-002 $14.94SFR 403-143-003 $14.94SFR 403-143-004 $14.94SFR 403-143-005 $14.94SFR 403-143-006 $14.94SFR 403-143-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-143-008 $14.94SFR 403-143-009 $14.94SFR 403-143-010 $14.94SFR 403-143-011 $14.94SFR 403-143-012 $14.94SFR 403-143-013 $14.94SFR 403-143-014 $14.94SFR 403-143-015 $14.94SFR 403-143-016 $14.94SFR 403-144-001 $14.94SFR 403-144-002 $14.94SFR 403-144-003 $14.94SFR 403-144-004 $14.94SFR 403-144-005 $14.94SFR 403-144-006 $14.94SFR 403-144-007 $14.94SFR 403-144-008 $14.94SFR 403-144-009 $14.94SFR 403-144-010 $14.94SFR 403-145-001 $14.94SFR 403-145-002 $14.94SFR 403-145-003 $14.94SFR 403-146-001 $14.94SFR 403-146-002 $14.94SFR 403-146-003 $14.94SFR 403-151-001 $14.94SFR 403-151-002 $14.94SFR 403-151-003 $14.94SFR 403-151-004 $14.94SFR 403-151-005 $14.94SFR 403-151-006 $14.94SFR 403-151-007 $14.94SFR 403-151-008 $14.94SFR 403-151-009 $14.94SFR 403-151-010 $14.94SFR 403-151-011 $14.94SFR 403-152-001 $14.94SFR 403-152-002 $14.94SFR 403-152-003 $14.94SFR 403-152-004 $14.94SFR 403-152-005 $14.94SFR 403-152-006 $14.94SFR 403-152-007 $14.94SFR 403-152-008 $14.94SFR 403-152-009 $14.94SFR 403-152-010 $14.94SFR 403-152-011 $14.94SFR 403-152-012 $14.94SFR 403-152-013 $14.94SFR 403-152-014 $14.94SFR 403-152-015 $14.94SFR 403-152-016 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-152-017 $14.94SFR 403-152-018 $14.94SFR 403-152-019 $14.94SFR 403-152-020 $7.46VSFR 403-153-001 $14.94SFR 403-153-002 $14.94SFR 403-153-003 $14.94SFR 403-153-004 $14.94SFR 403-153-005 $14.94SFR 403-153-006 $14.94SFR 403-153-007 $14.94SFR 403-153-008 $14.94SFR 403-153-009 $14.94SFR 403-153-010 $14.94SFR 403-153-011 $14.94SFR 403-153-012 $14.94SFR 403-153-013 $14.94SFR 403-153-014 $14.94SFR 403-153-015 $14.94SFR 403-153-016 $14.94SFR 403-153-017 $14.94SFR 403-153-018 $14.94SFR 403-153-019 $14.94SFR 403-153-020 $14.94SFR 403-153-021 $14.94SFR 403-153-022 $14.94SFR 403-153-023 $14.94SFR 403-153-024 $14.94SFR 403-154-001 $14.94SFR 403-154-002 $14.94SFR 403-154-003 $14.94SFR 403-154-004 $14.94SFR 403-154-005 $14.94SFR 403-154-006 $14.94SFR 403-154-007 $14.94SFR 403-154-008 $14.94SFR 403-155-001 $14.94SFR 403-155-002 $14.94SFR 403-155-003 $14.94SFR 403-155-004 $14.94SFR 403-155-005 $14.94SFR 403-155-006 $14.94SFR 403-155-007 $14.94SFR 403-155-008 $14.94SFR 403-155-009 $14.94SFR 403-155-010 $14.94SFR 403-161-001 $14.94SFR 403-161-002 $14.94SFR 403-161-003 $14.94SFR 403-162-001 $14.94SFR 403-162-002 $14.94SFR 403-162-003 $14.94SFR - 184 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-162-004 $14.94SFR 403-162-005 $14.94SFR 403-162-006 $14.94SFR 403-162-007 $14.94SFR 403-162-008 $14.94SFR 403-162-009 $14.94SFR 403-162-010 $14.94SFR 403-162-011 $14.94SFR 403-162-012 $14.94SFR 403-162-013 $14.94SFR 403-162-014 $14.94SFR 403-162-015 $14.94SFR 403-162-016 $14.94SFR 403-163-001 $14.94SFR 403-163-002 $14.94SFR 403-163-003 $14.94SFR 403-163-004 $14.94SFR 403-163-005 $14.94SFR 403-163-006 $14.94SFR 403-163-007 $14.94SFR 403-163-008 $14.94SFR 403-163-009 $14.94SFR 403-163-010 $14.94SFR 403-163-011 $14.94SFR 403-163-012 $14.94SFR 403-163-013 $14.94SFR 403-163-014 $14.94SFR 403-163-015 $14.94SFR 403-163-016 $14.94SFR 403-164-001 $14.94SFR 403-164-002 $14.94SFR 403-164-003 $14.94SFR 403-164-004 $14.94SFR 403-164-005 $14.94SFR 403-164-006 $14.94SFR 403-164-007 $14.94SFR 403-164-008 $14.94SFR 403-164-009 $14.94SFR 403-164-010 $14.94SFR 403-164-011 $14.94SFR 403-164-012 $14.94SFR 403-164-013 $14.94SFR 403-164-014 $14.94SFR 403-164-015 $14.94SFR 403-165-001 $14.94SFR 403-165-002 $14.94SFR 403-165-003 $14.94SFR 403-165-004 $14.94SFR 403-165-005 $14.94SFR 403-165-006 $14.94SFR 403-165-007 $14.94SFR 403-165-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-165-009 $14.94SFR 403-165-010 $14.94SFR 403-165-011 $14.94SFR 403-165-012 $14.94SFR 403-165-013 $14.94SFR 403-165-014 $14.94SFR 403-165-015 $14.94SFR 403-165-016 $14.94SFR 403-165-017 $14.94SFR 403-165-018 $14.94SFR 403-165-019 $14.94SFR 403-165-020 $14.94SFR 403-165-021 $14.94SFR 403-166-001 $14.94SFR 403-167-001 $14.94SFR 403-167-002 $14.94SFR 403-167-003 $14.94SFR 403-167-004 $14.94SFR 403-167-005 $14.94SFR 403-167-006 $14.94SFR 403-167-007 $14.94SFR 403-168-004 $74.70INST 403-171-001 $14.94SFR 403-171-002 $14.94SFR 403-171-003 $14.94SFR 403-171-006 $14.94SFR 403-171-007 $14.94SFR 403-171-008 $14.94SFR 403-171-009 $14.94SFR 403-171-010 $14.94SFR 403-171-011 $14.94SFR 403-171-012 $14.94SFR 403-172-001 $14.94SFR 403-172-002 $14.94SFR 403-172-003 $14.94SFR 403-172-004 $14.94SFR 403-172-005 $14.94SFR 403-172-006 $14.94SFR 403-172-007 $14.94SFR 403-172-008 $14.94SFR 403-172-009 $14.94SFR 403-172-010 $14.94SFR 403-172-011 $14.94SFR 403-172-012 $14.94SFR 403-172-013 $14.94SFR 403-172-014 $14.94SFR 403-172-015 $14.94SFR 403-173-001 $14.94SFR 403-173-002 $14.94SFR 403-174-001 $14.94SFR 403-174-002 $14.94SFR 403-174-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-174-004 $14.94SFR 403-174-005 $14.94SFR 403-174-006 $14.94SFR 403-174-007 $14.94SFR 403-174-008 $14.94SFR 403-174-009 $14.94SFR 403-174-010 $14.94SFR 403-174-011 $14.94SFR 403-174-012 $14.94SFR 403-175-001 $14.94SFR 403-175-002 $14.94SFR 403-175-003 $14.94SFR 403-175-004 $14.94SFR 403-175-005 $14.94SFR 403-175-006 $14.94SFR 403-175-007 $14.94SFR 403-175-008 $14.94SFR 403-175-009 $14.94SFR 403-175-010 $14.94SFR 403-175-011 $14.94SFR 403-175-012 $14.94SFR 403-175-013 $14.94SFR 403-175-014 $14.94SFR 403-175-015 $14.94SFR 403-175-016 $14.94SFR 403-175-017 $14.94SFR 403-175-018 $14.94SFR 403-175-019 $14.94SFR 403-175-020 $14.94SFR 403-175-021 $14.94SFR 403-175-022 $14.94SFR 403-176-001 $14.94SFR 403-176-002 $14.94SFR 403-176-003 $14.94SFR 403-176-004 $14.94SFR 403-176-005 $14.94SFR 403-176-006 $14.94SFR 403-176-007 $14.94SFR 403-176-008 $14.94SFR 403-176-009 $14.94SFR 403-176-010 $14.94SFR 403-177-001 $14.94SFR 403-177-002 $14.94SFR 403-177-003 $14.94SFR 403-177-004 $14.94SFR 403-177-005 $14.94SFR 403-177-006 $14.94SFR 403-177-007 $14.94SFR 403-177-008 $14.94SFR 403-177-009 $14.94SFR 403-177-010 $14.94SFR 403-177-011 $14.94SFR - 185 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-177-012 $14.94SFR 403-177-013 $14.94SFR 403-177-014 $14.94SFR 403-177-015 $14.94SFR 403-177-016 $14.94SFR 403-177-017 $14.94SFR 403-177-018 $14.94SFR 403-177-019 $14.94SFR 403-177-020 $14.94SFR 403-177-021 $14.94SFR 403-177-022 $14.94SFR 403-181-001 $14.94SFR 403-181-002 $14.94SFR 403-181-003 $14.94SFR 403-181-004 $14.94SFR 403-181-005 $14.94SFR 403-181-006 $14.94SFR 403-181-007 $14.94SFR 403-181-008 $14.94SFR 403-181-009 $14.94SFR 403-181-010 $14.94SFR 403-181-011 $14.94SFR 403-181-012 $14.94SFR 403-181-013 $14.94SFR 403-181-014 $14.94SFR 403-181-015 $14.94SFR 403-181-016 $14.94SFR 403-181-017 $14.94SFR 403-181-018 $14.94SFR 403-181-019 $14.94SFR 403-181-020 $14.94SFR 403-181-021 $14.94SFR 403-181-022 $14.94SFR 403-181-023 $14.94SFR 403-181-024 $14.94SFR 403-181-025 $14.94SFR 403-181-026 $14.94SFR 403-181-027 $14.94SFR 403-181-028 $14.94SFR 403-181-029 $14.94SFR 403-181-030 $14.94SFR 403-181-031 $14.94SFR 403-182-001 $14.94SFR 403-182-002 $14.94SFR 403-182-003 $14.94SFR 403-182-004 $14.94SFR 403-182-005 $14.94SFR 403-182-006 $14.94SFR 403-182-007 $14.94SFR 403-182-008 $14.94SFR 403-182-009 $14.94SFR 403-182-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-182-011 $14.94SFR 403-182-012 $14.94SFR 403-182-013 $14.94SFR 403-182-014 $14.94SFR 403-182-015 $14.94SFR 403-182-016 $14.94SFR 403-182-017 $14.94SFR 403-182-021 $14.94SFR 403-184-002 $14.94SFR 403-184-003 $14.94SFR 403-184-004 $14.94SFR 403-184-005 $14.94SFR 403-184-006 $14.94SFR 403-184-007 $14.94SFR 403-184-008 $14.94SFR 403-184-009 $14.94SFR 403-184-010 $14.94SFR 403-185-001 $14.94SFR 403-185-002 $14.94SFR 403-185-003 $14.94SFR 403-185-004 $14.94SFR 403-185-005 $14.94SFR 403-185-006 $14.94SFR 403-185-007 $14.94SFR 403-185-008 $14.94SFR 403-185-009 $14.94SFR 403-185-010 $14.94SFR 403-185-011 $14.94SFR 403-185-012 $14.94SFR 403-186-001 $14.94SFR 403-186-002 $14.94SFR 403-186-003 $14.94SFR 403-186-004 $14.94SFR 403-186-005 $14.94SFR 403-191-001 $14.94SFR 403-191-002 $14.94SFR 403-191-003 $14.94SFR 403-191-004 $14.94SFR 403-191-005 $14.94SFR 403-191-006 $14.94SFR 403-191-007 $14.94SFR 403-191-008 $14.94SFR 403-191-009 $14.94SFR 403-191-010 $14.94SFR 403-191-011 $14.94SFR 403-191-012 $14.94SFR 403-191-013 $14.94SFR 403-191-014 $14.94SFR 403-191-015 $14.94SFR 403-191-016 $14.94SFR 403-191-017 $14.94SFR 403-192-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-192-002 $14.94SFR 403-192-003 $14.94SFR 403-192-004 $14.94SFR 403-192-005 $14.94SFR 403-192-006 $14.94SFR 403-192-007 $14.94SFR 403-192-008 $14.94SFR 403-192-009 $14.94SFR 403-192-010 $14.94SFR 403-192-011 $14.94SFR 403-192-012 $14.94SFR 403-192-013 $14.94SFR 403-192-014 $14.94SFR 403-192-015 $14.94SFR 403-192-016 $14.94SFR 403-192-017 $14.94SFR 403-192-018 $14.94SFR 403-192-019 $14.94SFR 403-192-020 $14.94SFR 403-192-021 $14.94SFR 403-192-022 $14.94SFR 403-192-023 $14.94SFR 403-192-024 $14.94SFR 403-192-025 $14.94SFR 403-192-026 $14.94SFR 403-192-027 $14.94SFR 403-192-028 $14.94SFR 403-192-029 $14.94SFR 403-192-030 $14.94SFR 403-192-031 $14.94SFR 403-192-032 $14.94SFR 403-192-033 $14.94SFR 403-193-001 $14.94SFR 403-193-002 $14.94SFR 403-193-003 $14.94SFR 403-193-004 $14.94SFR 403-193-005 $14.94SFR 403-193-006 $14.94SFR 403-193-007 $14.94SFR 403-193-008 $14.94SFR 403-193-009 $14.94SFR 403-193-010 $14.94SFR 403-193-011 $14.94SFR 403-193-012 $14.94SFR 403-193-013 $14.94SFR 403-193-014 $14.94SFR 403-193-015 $14.94SFR 403-193-016 $14.94SFR 403-193-017 $14.94SFR 403-193-018 $14.94SFR 403-193-019 $14.94SFR 403-193-020 $14.94SFR - 186 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-193-021 $14.94SFR 403-193-022 $14.94SFR 403-193-023 $14.94SFR 403-193-024 $14.94SFR 403-193-025 $14.94SFR 403-193-026 $14.94SFR 403-193-027 $14.94SFR 403-193-028 $14.94SFR 403-201-001 $14.94SFR 403-201-002 $14.94SFR 403-201-003 $14.94SFR 403-201-004 $14.94SFR 403-201-005 $14.94SFR 403-201-006 $14.94SFR 403-201-007 $14.94SFR 403-201-008 $14.94SFR 403-201-009 $14.94SFR 403-201-010 $14.94SFR 403-201-011 $14.94SFR 403-201-012 $14.94SFR 403-201-013 $7.46VSFR 403-202-002 $14.94SFR 403-202-003 $14.94SFR 403-202-004 $14.94SFR 403-202-005 $14.94SFR 403-202-006 $14.94SFR 403-202-007 $14.94SFR 403-202-008 $14.94SFR 403-202-009 $14.94SFR 403-202-011 $7.46VCOM 403-202-012 $74.70COM 403-211-001 $74.70COM 403-211-003 $14.94SFR 403-211-004 $14.94SFR 403-211-005 $14.94SFR 403-211-006 $14.94SFR 403-211-007 $14.94SFR 403-211-008 $14.94SFR 403-211-009 $14.94SFR 403-211-010 $14.94SFR 403-211-011 $14.94SFR 403-211-014 $14.94SFR 403-211-015 $14.94SFR 403-211-016 $14.94SFR 403-211-017 $14.94SFR 403-211-018 $14.94SFR 403-211-019 $14.94SFR 403-211-020 $14.94SFR 403-211-021 $14.94SFR 403-211-024 $7.46VCOM 403-211-027 $74.70COM 403-211-028 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-211-029 $14.94SFR 403-212-001 $14.94SFR 403-212-002 $14.94SFR 403-212-003 $14.94SFR 403-212-004 $14.94SFR 403-212-005 $14.94SFR 403-212-006 $14.94SFR 403-212-007 $14.94SFR 403-212-008 $14.94SFR 403-212-009 $14.94SFR 403-212-010 $14.94SFR 403-212-011 $14.94SFR 403-212-012 $14.94SFR 403-212-013 $14.94SFR 403-212-014 $14.94SFR 403-212-015 $14.94SFR 403-212-016 $14.94SFR 403-212-017 $14.94SFR 403-212-018 $14.94SFR 403-212-019 $14.94SFR 403-212-020 $14.94SFR 403-212-021 $14.94SFR 403-240-003 $14.94SFR 403-240-004 $14.94SFR 403-240-005 $14.94SFR 403-240-006 $14.94SFR 403-240-007 $14.94SFR 403-240-008 $14.94SFR 403-240-009 $14.94SFR 403-240-010 $14.94SFR 403-251-001 $14.94SFR 403-251-002 $14.94SFR 403-251-003 $14.94SFR 403-251-004 $14.94SFR 403-251-005 $14.94SFR 403-251-006 $14.94SFR 403-251-007 $14.94SFR 403-251-008 $14.94SFR 403-252-001 $14.94SFR 403-252-002 $14.94SFR 403-252-003 $14.94SFR 403-252-004 $14.94SFR 403-253-001 $14.94SFR 403-253-002 $14.94SFR 403-253-003 $14.94SFR 403-253-004 $14.94SFR 403-253-005 $14.94SFR 403-253-006 $14.94SFR 403-253-007 $14.94SFR 403-271-001 $14.94SFR 403-271-002 $14.94SFR 403-271-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-271-004 $14.94SFR 403-271-005 $14.94SFR 403-271-006 $14.94SFR 403-271-007 $14.94SFR 403-271-008 $14.94SFR 403-271-009 $14.94SFR 403-271-010 $14.94SFR 403-271-011 $14.94SFR 403-271-012 $14.94SFR 403-271-013 $14.94SFR 403-271-014 $14.94SFR 403-272-002 $14.94SFR 403-272-003 $14.94SFR 403-272-004 $14.94SFR 403-272-005 $14.94SFR 403-272-006 $14.94SFR 403-272-007 $14.94SFR 403-272-008 $14.94SFR 403-272-009 $14.94SFR 403-272-010 $14.94SFR 403-272-011 $14.94SFR 403-272-012 $14.94SFR 403-272-013 $14.94SFR 403-272-014 $14.94SFR 403-272-015 $14.94SFR 403-272-016 $14.94SFR 403-272-017 $14.94SFR 403-272-018 $14.94SFR 403-272-019 $14.94SFR 403-272-020 $14.94SFR 403-273-001 $14.94SFR 403-273-002 $14.94SFR 403-273-003 $14.94SFR 403-273-004 $14.94SFR 403-274-001 $14.94SFR 403-274-002 $14.94SFR 403-274-003 $14.94SFR 403-274-004 $14.94SFR 403-274-005 $14.94SFR 403-274-006 $14.94SFR 403-274-007 $14.94SFR 403-274-008 $14.94SFR 403-274-009 $14.94SFR 403-274-010 $14.94SFR 403-274-011 $14.94SFR 403-274-012 $14.94SFR 403-274-013 $14.94SFR 403-274-014 $14.94SFR 403-274-015 $14.94SFR 403-274-016 $14.94SFR 403-274-017 $14.94SFR 403-274-018 $14.94SFR - 187 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-274-019 $14.94SFR 403-301-001 $14.94SFR 403-301-002 $14.94SFR 403-301-003 $14.94SFR 403-301-004 $14.94SFR 403-301-007 $14.94SFR 403-301-008 $14.94SFR 403-301-009 $14.94SFR 403-301-010 $14.94SFR 403-301-011 $14.94SFR 403-301-012 $14.94SFR 403-301-013 $14.94SFR 403-301-014 $14.94SFR 403-301-015 $14.94SFR 403-301-016 $14.94SFR 403-301-017 $14.94SFR 403-301-018 $14.94SFR 403-301-019 $14.94SFR 403-301-020 $14.94SFR 403-301-021 $14.94SFR 403-301-022 $14.94SFR 403-301-023 $14.94SFR 403-302-001 $14.94SFR 403-302-002 $14.94SFR 403-302-003 $14.94SFR 403-302-004 $14.94SFR 403-302-005 $14.94SFR 403-302-006 $14.94SFR 403-302-007 $14.94SFR 403-302-008 $14.94SFR 403-302-009 $14.94SFR 403-302-010 $14.94SFR 403-302-011 $14.94SFR 403-302-012 $14.94SFR 403-302-013 $14.94SFR 403-302-014 $14.94SFR 403-302-015 $14.94SFR 403-302-016 $14.94SFR 403-302-017 $14.94SFR 403-302-018 $14.94SFR 403-311-001 $14.94SFR 403-311-002 $14.94SFR 403-311-003 $14.94SFR 403-311-004 $14.94SFR 403-311-005 $14.94SFR 403-311-006 $14.94SFR 403-311-007 $14.94SFR 403-311-008 $14.94SFR 403-311-009 $14.94SFR 403-311-010 $14.94SFR 403-311-011 $14.94SFR 403-311-012 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-311-013 $14.94SFR 403-311-014 $14.94SFR 403-311-015 $14.94SFR 403-312-001 $14.94SFR 403-312-002 $14.94SFR 403-312-003 $14.94SFR 403-312-004 $14.94SFR 403-312-005 $14.94SFR 403-312-006 $14.94SFR 403-312-007 $14.94SFR 403-312-008 $14.94SFR 403-312-009 $14.94SFR 403-312-010 $14.94SFR 403-312-011 $14.94SFR 403-312-012 $14.94SFR 403-312-013 $14.94SFR 403-312-014 $14.94SFR 403-312-015 $14.94SFR 403-312-016 $14.94SFR 403-312-017 $14.94SFR 403-312-018 $14.94SFR 403-312-019 $14.94SFR 403-312-020 $14.94SFR 403-312-021 $14.94SFR 403-312-022 $14.94SFR 403-312-023 $14.94SFR 403-312-024 $14.94SFR 403-312-025 $14.94SFR 403-312-026 $14.94SFR 403-312-027 $14.94SFR 403-312-028 $14.94SFR 403-312-029 $14.94SFR 403-321-001 $14.94SFR 403-321-002 $14.94SFR 403-321-003 $14.94SFR 403-321-004 $14.94SFR 403-321-005 $14.94SFR 403-321-006 $14.94SFR 403-321-007 $14.94SFR 403-321-008 $14.94SFR 403-321-009 $14.94SFR 403-321-010 $14.94SFR 403-321-011 $14.94SFR 403-321-012 $14.94SFR 403-321-013 $14.94SFR 403-321-014 $14.94SFR 403-321-015 $14.94SFR 403-322-001 $14.94SFR 403-322-002 $14.94SFR 403-322-003 $14.94SFR 403-322-004 $14.94SFR 403-322-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-322-006 $14.94SFR 403-322-007 $14.94SFR 403-322-008 $14.94SFR 403-322-009 $14.94SFR 403-322-010 $14.94SFR 403-322-011 $14.94SFR 403-322-012 $14.94SFR 403-322-013 $14.94SFR 403-322-014 $14.94SFR 403-322-015 $14.94SFR 403-322-016 $14.94SFR 403-322-017 $14.94SFR 403-322-018 $14.94SFR 403-322-019 $14.94SFR 403-322-020 $14.94SFR 403-322-021 $14.94SFR 403-322-022 $14.94SFR 403-322-023 $14.94SFR 403-322-024 $14.94SFR 403-322-025 $14.94SFR 403-322-026 $14.94SFR 403-322-027 $14.94SFR 403-322-028 $14.94SFR 403-322-029 $14.94SFR 403-322-030 $14.94SFR 403-322-031 $14.94SFR 403-322-032 $14.94SFR 403-331-001 $14.94SFR 403-331-002 $14.94SFR 403-331-003 $14.94SFR 403-331-004 $14.94SFR 403-331-005 $14.94SFR 403-331-006 $14.94SFR 403-331-007 $14.94SFR 403-331-008 $14.94SFR 403-331-009 $14.94SFR 403-331-010 $14.94SFR 403-332-001 $14.94SFR 403-332-002 $14.94SFR 403-332-003 $14.94SFR 403-332-004 $14.94SFR 403-332-005 $14.94SFR 403-332-006 $14.94SFR 403-332-007 $14.94SFR 403-333-001 $14.94SFR 403-333-002 $14.94SFR 403-333-003 $14.94SFR 403-333-004 $14.94SFR 403-333-005 $14.94SFR 403-333-006 $14.94SFR 403-333-007 $14.94SFR 403-333-015 $14.94SFR - 188 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-333-016 $14.94SFR 403-333-017 $14.94SFR 403-333-018 $14.94SFR 403-333-019 $14.94SFR 403-333-020 $14.94SFR 403-341-001 $14.94SFR 403-341-002 $14.94SFR 403-341-003 $14.94SFR 403-341-004 $14.94SFR 403-341-005 $14.94SFR 403-341-006 $14.94SFR 403-341-007 $14.94SFR 403-341-008 $14.94SFR 403-341-012 $14.94SFR 403-341-013 $14.94SFR 403-341-014 $14.94SFR 403-341-015 $14.94SFR 403-341-016 $14.94SFR 403-341-017 $14.94SFR 403-341-018 $14.94SFR 403-341-019 $14.94SFR 403-341-020 $14.94SFR 403-341-021 $14.94SFR 403-341-022 $14.94SFR 403-341-023 $14.94SFR 403-341-024 $14.94SFR 403-341-025 $14.94SFR 403-341-026 $14.94SFR 403-341-027 $14.94SFR 403-341-028 $14.94SFR 403-341-029 $14.94SFR 403-341-030 $14.94SFR 403-342-001 $14.94SFR 403-342-002 $14.94SFR 403-342-003 $14.94SFR 403-342-004 $14.94SFR 403-342-005 $14.94SFR 403-342-006 $14.94SFR 403-342-007 $14.94SFR 403-342-008 $14.94SFR 403-342-009 $14.94SFR 403-342-010 $14.94SFR 403-342-011 $14.94SFR 403-342-012 $14.94SFR 403-342-013 $14.94SFR 403-342-014 $14.94SFR 403-342-015 $14.94SFR 403-342-016 $14.94SFR 403-342-017 $14.94SFR 403-342-018 $14.94SFR 403-342-019 $14.94SFR 403-371-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-372-001 $14.94SFR 403-372-002 $14.94SFR 403-372-003 $14.94SFR 403-372-004 $14.94SFR 403-372-005 $14.94SFR 403-372-006 $14.94SFR 403-372-007 $14.94SFR 403-372-008 $14.94SFR 403-372-009 $14.94SFR 403-372-010 $14.94SFR 403-372-011 $14.94SFR 403-372-012 $14.94SFR 403-372-013 $14.94SFR 403-372-014 $14.94SFR 403-373-001 $14.94SFR 403-373-002 $14.94SFR 403-373-003 $14.94SFR 403-373-004 $14.94SFR 403-374-001 $14.94SFR 403-374-002 $14.94SFR 403-374-003 $14.94SFR 403-374-004 $14.94SFR 403-374-005 $14.94SFR 403-374-006 $14.94SFR 403-374-007 $14.94SFR 403-374-008 $14.94SFR 403-375-001 $14.94SFR 403-375-002 $14.94SFR 403-375-003 $14.94SFR 403-375-004 $14.94SFR 403-375-005 $14.94SFR 403-375-006 $14.94SFR 403-375-007 $14.94SFR 403-375-008 $14.94SFR 403-376-001 $14.94SFR 403-376-002 $14.94SFR 403-376-003 $14.94SFR 403-376-004 $14.94SFR 403-376-005 $14.94SFR 403-376-006 $14.94SFR 403-376-007 $14.94SFR 403-376-008 $14.94SFR 403-376-009 $14.94SFR 403-376-010 $14.94SFR 403-376-011 $14.94SFR 403-376-012 $14.94SFR 403-376-013 $14.94SFR 403-377-001 $14.94SFR 403-377-002 $14.94SFR 403-377-003 $14.94SFR 403-377-004 $14.94SFR 403-377-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-377-006 $14.94SFR 403-377-007 $14.94SFR 403-377-008 $14.94SFR 403-377-009 $29.88MFR2 403-377-010 $14.94SFR 403-377-011 $14.94SFR 403-377-012 $14.94SFR 403-377-013 $14.94SFR 403-381-001 $14.94SFR 403-381-002 $14.94SFR 403-381-003 $14.94SFR 403-381-004 $14.94SFR 403-381-005 $14.94SFR 403-381-006 $14.94SFR 403-381-008 $14.94SFR 403-381-009 $14.94SFR 403-381-010 $14.94SFR 403-381-011 $14.94SFR 403-381-012 $14.94SFR 403-381-013 $14.94SFR 403-381-014 $14.94SFR 403-381-015 $14.94SFR 403-381-016 $14.94SFR 403-382-001 $14.94SFR 403-383-001 $14.94SFR 403-383-002 $14.94SFR 403-384-001 $14.94SFR 403-384-002 $14.94SFR 403-384-003 $14.94SFR 403-384-004 $14.94SFR 403-384-005 $14.94SFR 403-384-006 $14.94SFR 403-384-007 $14.94SFR 403-384-008 $14.94SFR 403-391-001 $14.94SFR 403-391-002 $14.94SFR 403-391-003 $14.94SFR 403-391-004 $14.94SFR 403-391-005 $14.94SFR 403-391-006 $14.94SFR 403-391-007 $14.94SFR 403-391-008 $14.94SFR 403-391-009 $14.94SFR 403-391-010 $14.94SFR 403-391-011 $14.94SFR 403-391-012 $14.94SFR 403-391-013 $14.94SFR 403-391-014 $14.94SFR 403-391-015 $14.94SFR 403-391-016 $14.94SFR 403-391-017 $14.94SFR 403-391-018 $14.94SFR - 189 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-391-019 $14.94SFR 403-391-020 $14.94SFR 403-391-021 $14.94SFR 403-391-022 $14.94SFR 403-391-023 $14.94SFR 403-392-001 $14.94SFR 403-392-002 $14.94SFR 403-392-003 $14.94SFR 403-392-004 $14.94SFR 403-392-005 $14.94SFR 403-392-006 $14.94SFR 403-392-007 $14.94SFR 403-392-008 $14.94SFR 403-392-009 $14.94SFR 403-401-001 $14.94SFR 403-401-002 $14.94SFR 403-401-003 $14.94SFR 403-401-004 $14.94SFR 403-401-005 $14.94SFR 403-401-006 $14.94SFR 403-401-007 $14.94SFR 403-401-008 $14.94SFR 403-401-009 $14.94SFR 403-401-010 $14.94SFR 403-401-011 $14.94SFR 403-401-012 $14.94SFR 403-401-013 $14.94SFR 403-401-014 $14.94SFR 403-401-015 $14.94SFR 403-401-016 $14.94SFR 403-401-017 $14.94SFR 403-401-018 $14.94SFR 403-401-019 $14.94SFR 403-401-020 $14.94SFR 403-401-021 $14.94SFR 403-401-022 $14.94SFR 403-401-023 $14.94SFR 403-401-024 $14.94SFR 403-401-025 $14.94SFR 403-401-026 $14.94SFR 403-401-027 $14.94SFR 403-402-001 $14.94SFR 403-402-002 $14.94SFR 403-402-003 $14.94SFR 403-402-004 $14.94SFR 403-402-005 $14.94SFR 403-402-006 $14.94SFR 403-402-007 $14.94SFR 403-402-008 $14.94SFR 403-402-009 $14.94SFR 403-402-010 $14.94SFR 403-402-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-402-012 $14.94SFR 403-403-001 $14.94SFR 403-403-002 $14.94SFR 403-403-003 $14.94SFR 403-403-004 $14.94SFR 403-403-005 $14.94SFR 403-403-006 $14.94SFR 403-403-007 $14.94SFR 403-404-001 $14.94SFR 403-404-002 $14.94SFR 403-404-003 $14.94SFR 403-404-004 $14.94SFR 403-441-009 $14.94SFR 403-441-010 $14.94SFR 403-441-011 $14.94SFR 403-441-012 $14.94SFR 403-441-013 $14.94SFR 403-441-014 $14.94SFR 403-441-015 $14.94SFR 403-441-016 $14.94SFR 403-441-017 $14.94SFR 403-441-018 $14.94SFR 403-441-019 $14.94SFR 403-441-020 $14.94SFR 403-441-021 $14.94SFR 403-441-022 $14.94SFR 403-441-023 $14.94SFR 403-441-024 $14.94SFR 403-441-025 $14.94SFR 403-441-026 $14.94SFR 403-441-027 $14.94SFR 403-441-028 $14.94SFR 403-441-029 $14.94SFR 403-442-001 $14.94SFR 403-442-002 $14.94SFR 403-442-003 $14.94SFR 403-442-004 $14.94SFR 403-442-005 $14.94SFR 403-442-006 $14.94SFR 403-442-007 $14.94SFR 403-442-008 $14.94SFR 403-442-009 $14.94SFR 403-442-010 $14.94SFR 403-442-011 $14.94SFR 403-442-012 $14.94SFR 403-442-013 $14.94SFR 403-442-014 $14.94SFR 403-442-015 $14.94SFR 403-442-016 $14.94SFR 403-443-001 $14.94SFR 403-443-002 $14.94SFR 403-443-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-443-004 $14.94SFR 403-443-005 $14.94SFR 403-443-006 $14.94SFR 403-443-007 $14.94SFR 403-443-008 $14.94SFR 403-443-009 $14.94SFR 403-443-010 $14.94SFR 403-443-011 $14.94SFR 403-443-012 $14.94SFR 403-443-013 $14.94SFR 403-443-014 $14.94SFR 403-443-015 $14.94SFR 403-444-001 $14.94SFR 403-444-002 $14.94SFR 403-444-003 $14.94SFR 403-444-004 $14.94SFR 403-444-005 $14.94SFR 403-444-006 $14.94SFR 403-445-001 $14.94SFR 403-445-002 $14.94SFR 403-445-003 $14.94SFR 403-445-004 $14.94SFR 403-445-005 $14.94SFR 403-445-006 $14.94SFR 403-445-007 $14.94SFR 403-451-001 $14.94SFR 403-451-002 $14.94SFR 403-451-003 $14.94SFR 403-451-004 $14.94SFR 403-451-005 $14.94SFR 403-451-006 $14.94SFR 403-451-007 $14.94SFR 403-451-008 $14.94SFR 403-451-009 $14.94SFR 403-452-001 $14.94SFR 403-452-002 $14.94SFR 403-452-003 $14.94SFR 403-452-004 $14.94SFR 403-452-005 $14.94SFR 403-452-006 $14.94SFR 403-452-007 $14.94SFR 403-452-008 $14.94SFR 403-452-009 $14.94SFR 403-452-010 $14.94SFR 403-452-011 $14.94SFR 403-452-012 $14.94SFR 403-452-013 $14.94SFR 403-453-001 $14.94SFR 403-453-004 $14.94SFR 403-453-005 $14.94SFR 403-453-006 $14.94SFR 403-453-007 $14.94SFR - 190 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-453-008 $14.94SFR 403-453-009 $14.94SFR 403-453-010 $14.94SFR 403-453-011 $14.94SFR 403-453-012 $14.94SFR 403-453-013 $14.94SFR 403-453-014 $14.94SFR 403-453-015 $14.94SFR 403-453-016 $14.94SFR 403-453-018 $14.94SFR 403-453-021 $14.94SFR 403-461-001 $14.94SFR 403-461-002 $14.94SFR 403-461-003 $7.46VSFR 403-461-004 $14.94SFR 403-461-005 $14.94SFR 403-461-006 $14.94SFR 403-461-007 $14.94SFR 403-461-008 $14.94SFR 403-461-009 $14.94SFR 403-461-010 $14.94SFR 403-461-011 $14.94SFR 403-461-012 $14.94SFR 403-462-001 $14.94SFR 403-462-002 $14.94SFR 403-462-003 $14.94SFR 403-462-004 $14.94SFR 403-462-005 $14.94SFR 403-462-006 $14.94SFR 403-462-007 $14.94SFR 403-462-008 $14.94SFR 403-462-009 $14.94SFR 403-462-010 $14.94SFR 403-462-011 $14.94SFR 403-462-012 $14.94SFR 403-462-013 $14.94SFR 403-462-014 $14.94SFR 403-462-015 $14.94SFR 403-462-016 $14.94SFR 403-462-017 $14.94SFR 403-462-018 $14.94SFR 403-462-019 $14.94SFR 403-462-020 $14.94SFR 403-462-021 $14.94SFR 403-462-022 $14.94SFR 403-463-001 $14.94SFR 403-463-002 $14.94SFR 403-463-003 $14.94SFR 403-463-004 $14.94SFR 403-463-005 $14.94SFR 403-463-006 $14.94SFR 403-463-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-463-008 $14.94SFR 403-463-009 $14.94SFR 403-463-010 $14.94SFR 403-463-011 $14.94SFR 403-463-012 $14.94SFR 403-463-013 $14.94SFR 403-463-014 $14.94SFR 403-463-015 $14.94SFR 403-463-016 $14.94SFR 403-463-017 $14.94SFR 403-464-001 $14.94SFR 403-464-002 $14.94SFR 403-464-003 $14.94SFR 403-464-004 $14.94SFR 403-464-005 $14.94SFR 403-464-006 $14.94SFR 403-464-007 $14.94SFR 403-464-008 $14.94SFR 403-471-001 $14.94SFR 403-471-002 $14.94SFR 403-471-003 $14.94SFR 403-471-004 $14.94SFR 403-471-005 $14.94SFR 403-471-006 $14.94SFR 403-471-007 $14.94SFR 403-471-008 $14.94SFR 403-471-009 $14.94SFR 403-471-010 $14.94SFR 403-471-011 $14.94SFR 403-471-012 $14.94SFR 403-471-013 $14.94SFR 403-471-014 $14.94SFR 403-471-015 $14.94SFR 403-471-016 $14.94SFR 403-471-017 $14.94SFR 403-471-018 $14.94SFR 403-471-019 $14.94SFR 403-471-020 $14.94SFR 403-471-021 $14.94SFR 403-471-022 $14.94SFR 403-471-023 $14.94SFR 403-471-024 $14.94SFR 403-471-025 $14.94SFR 403-471-026 $14.94SFR 403-471-027 $14.94SFR 403-471-028 $14.94SFR 403-471-029 $14.94SFR 403-471-030 $14.94SFR 403-471-031 $14.94SFR 403-471-032 $14.94SFR 403-471-033 $14.94SFR 403-471-034 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-471-035 $14.94SFR 403-471-036 $14.94SFR 403-471-037 $14.94SFR 403-471-038 $14.94SFR 403-471-039 $14.94SFR 403-471-040 $14.94SFR 403-471-041 $14.94SFR 403-471-042 $14.94SFR 403-471-043 $14.94SFR 403-471-044 $14.94SFR 403-472-001 $14.94SFR 403-472-002 $14.94SFR 403-472-003 $14.94SFR 403-472-004 $14.94SFR 403-472-005 $14.94SFR 403-472-006 $14.94SFR 403-472-007 $14.94SFR 403-472-008 $14.94SFR 403-472-009 $14.94SFR 403-472-010 $14.94SFR 403-472-011 $14.94SFR 403-472-012 $14.94SFR 403-472-013 $14.94SFR 403-472-014 $14.94SFR 403-472-015 $14.94SFR 403-472-016 $14.94SFR 403-472-017 $14.94SFR 403-472-018 $14.94SFR 403-472-019 $14.94SFR 403-482-019 $14.94SFR 403-482-020 $14.94SFR 403-482-021 $14.94SFR 403-482-022 $14.94SFR 403-482-023 $14.94SFR 403-482-024 $14.94SFR 403-482-025 $14.94SFR 403-482-026 $14.94SFR 403-482-027 $14.94SFR 403-482-028 $14.94SFR 403-482-029 $14.94SFR 403-482-030 $14.94SFR 403-482-031 $14.94SFR 403-482-032 $14.94SFR 403-482-033 $14.94SFR 403-482-034 $14.94SFR 403-482-036 $14.94SFR 403-482-037 $14.94SFR 403-482-038 $14.94SFR 403-482-039 $14.94SFR 403-482-040 $14.94SFR 403-482-041 $14.94SFR 403-483-001 $14.94SFR - 191 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-483-002 $14.94SFR 403-483-003 $14.94SFR 403-483-004 $14.94SFR 403-483-005 $14.94SFR 403-483-006 $14.94SFR 403-483-007 $14.94SFR 403-483-008 $14.94SFR 403-483-009 $14.94SFR 403-483-010 $14.94SFR 403-483-011 $14.94SFR 403-483-012 $14.94SFR 403-483-013 $14.94SFR 403-483-014 $14.94SFR 403-483-015 $14.94SFR 403-483-016 $14.94SFR 403-483-017 $14.94SFR 403-483-018 $14.94SFR 403-483-019 $14.94SFR 403-483-020 $14.94SFR 403-483-021 $14.94SFR 403-484-001 $14.94SFR 403-484-002 $14.94SFR 403-484-003 $14.94SFR 403-484-004 $14.94SFR 403-484-005 $14.94SFR 403-484-006 $14.94SFR 403-484-007 $14.94SFR 403-484-008 $14.94SFR 403-484-009 $14.94SFR 403-484-010 $14.94SFR 403-484-011 $14.94SFR 403-484-012 $14.94SFR 403-484-013 $14.94SFR 403-484-014 $14.94SFR 403-484-015 $14.94SFR 403-484-016 $14.94SFR 403-484-017 $14.94SFR 403-484-018 $14.94SFR 403-484-019 $14.94SFR 403-484-020 $14.94SFR 403-484-021 $14.94SFR 403-484-022 $14.94SFR 403-484-023 $14.94SFR 403-490-001 $14.94SFR 403-490-002 $14.94SFR 403-490-003 $14.94SFR 403-490-004 $14.94SFR 403-490-005 $14.94SFR 403-490-006 $14.94SFR 403-490-007 $14.94SFR 403-490-008 $14.94SFR 403-490-009 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-490-010 $14.94SFR 403-490-011 $14.94SFR 403-490-012 $14.94SFR 403-490-013 $14.94SFR 403-490-014 $14.94SFR 403-490-015 $14.94SFR 403-490-016 $14.94SFR 403-490-017 $14.94SFR 403-490-018 $14.94SFR 403-490-019 $14.94SFR 403-490-020 $14.94SFR 403-490-021 $14.94SFR 403-490-022 $14.94SFR 403-490-023 $14.94SFR 403-490-024 $14.94SFR 403-490-025 $14.94SFR 403-490-026 $14.94SFR 403-490-027 $14.94SFR 403-490-028 $14.94SFR 403-490-029 $14.94SFR 403-490-030 $14.94SFR 403-490-031 $14.94SFR 403-490-032 $14.94SFR 403-490-033 $14.94SFR 403-490-034 $14.94SFR 403-490-035 $14.94SFR 403-490-036 $14.94SFR 403-490-037 $14.94SFR 403-490-038 $14.94SFR 403-490-039 $14.94SFR 403-490-040 $14.94SFR 403-490-041 $14.94SFR 403-490-042 $14.94SFR 403-490-043 $14.94SFR 403-490-044 $14.94SFR 403-490-045 $14.94SFR 403-490-046 $14.94SFR 403-500-001 $14.94SFR 403-500-002 $14.94SFR 403-500-003 $14.94SFR 403-500-004 $14.94SFR 403-500-005 $14.94SFR 403-500-006 $14.94SFR 403-500-007 $14.94SFR 403-500-008 $14.94SFR 403-500-009 $14.94SFR 403-500-010 $14.94SFR 403-500-011 $14.94SFR 403-500-012 $14.94SFR 403-500-013 $14.94SFR 403-500-014 $14.94SFR 403-500-015 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 403-500-016 $14.94SFR 403-500-017 $14.94SFR 403-500-018 $14.94SFR 403-540-001 $14.94SFR 403-540-002 $14.94SFR 403-540-003 $14.94SFR 403-540-004 $14.94SFR 403-540-005 $14.94SFR 403-540-006 $14.94SFR 403-540-007 $14.94SFR 403-540-008 $14.94SFR 403-540-009 $14.94SFR 403-540-010 $14.94SFR 403-540-011 $14.94SFR 403-540-012 $14.94SFR 403-540-013 $14.94SFR 403-540-014 $14.94SFR 403-540-015 $14.94SFR 403-540-016 $14.94SFR 403-540-017 $14.94SFR 403-540-018 $14.94SFR 403-540-019 $14.94SFR 403-540-020 $14.94SFR 403-540-021 $14.94SFR 403-540-022 $14.94SFR 403-540-023 $14.94SFR 403-540-024 $14.94SFR 403-540-025 $14.94SFR 403-540-026 $14.94SFR 403-540-027 $14.94SFR 403-540-028 $14.94SFR 403-540-029 $14.94SFR 403-540-030 $14.94SFR 403-540-031 $14.94SFR 405-081-001 $14.94SFR 405-081-002 $14.94SFR 405-081-003 $14.94SFR 405-081-004 $14.94SFR 405-081-005 $14.94SFR 405-081-006 $14.94SFR 405-082-001 $14.94SFR 405-082-002 $14.94SFR 405-082-003 $14.94SFR 405-082-004 $14.94SFR 405-082-005 $14.94SFR 405-082-006 $14.94SFR 405-082-007 $14.94SFR 405-082-008 $14.94SFR 405-082-009 $14.94SFR 405-082-010 $14.94SFR 405-082-011 $14.94SFR 405-082-012 $14.94SFR - 192 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-082-013 $14.94SFR 405-082-014 $14.94SFR 405-082-015 $14.94SFR 405-082-016 $14.94SFR 405-083-001 $14.94SFR 405-083-002 $14.94SFR 405-083-003 $14.94SFR 405-083-004 $14.94SFR 405-083-005 $14.94SFR 405-083-006 $14.94SFR 405-083-007 $14.94SFR 405-083-008 $14.94SFR 405-083-009 $14.94SFR 405-083-010 $14.94SFR 405-083-011 $14.94SFR 405-083-012 $14.94SFR 405-083-013 $14.94SFR 405-083-014 $14.94SFR 405-083-015 $14.94SFR 405-083-016 $14.94SFR 405-083-017 $14.94SFR 405-083-018 $14.94SFR 405-083-019 $14.94SFR 405-083-020 $14.94SFR 405-083-021 $14.94SFR 405-083-022 $14.94SFR 405-083-023 $14.94SFR 405-083-024 $14.94SFR 405-083-025 $14.94SFR 405-083-026 $14.94SFR 405-083-027 $14.94SFR 405-083-028 $14.94SFR 405-083-029 $14.94SFR 405-083-030 $14.94SFR 405-084-001 $14.94SFR 405-084-002 $14.94SFR 405-084-003 $14.94SFR 405-084-004 $14.94SFR 405-084-005 $14.94SFR 405-084-006 $14.94SFR 405-084-007 $14.94SFR 405-084-008 $14.94SFR 405-084-009 $14.94SFR 405-084-010 $14.94SFR 405-084-011 $14.94SFR 405-084-012 $14.94SFR 405-084-013 $14.94SFR 405-084-014 $14.94SFR 405-084-015 $14.94SFR 405-084-016 $14.94SFR 405-084-017 $14.94SFR 405-084-018 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-084-019 $14.94SFR 405-084-020 $14.94SFR 405-084-021 $14.94SFR 405-084-022 $14.94SFR 405-084-023 $14.94SFR 405-084-024 $14.94SFR 405-084-025 $14.94SFR 405-084-026 $14.94SFR 405-091-001 $14.94SFR 405-091-002 $14.94SFR 405-091-003 $14.94SFR 405-091-004 $14.94SFR 405-091-005 $14.94SFR 405-091-006 $14.94SFR 405-091-007 $14.94SFR 405-091-008 $14.94SFR 405-091-009 $14.94SFR 405-091-010 $14.94SFR 405-091-011 $14.94SFR 405-091-012 $14.94SFR 405-091-013 $14.94SFR 405-091-014 $14.94SFR 405-091-015 $14.94SFR 405-092-001 $14.94SFR 405-092-002 $14.94SFR 405-092-003 $14.94SFR 405-092-004 $14.94SFR 405-092-005 $14.94SFR 405-092-006 $14.94SFR 405-092-007 $14.94SFR 405-092-008 $14.94SFR 405-092-009 $14.94SFR 405-092-010 $14.94SFR 405-092-011 $14.94SFR 405-092-012 $14.94SFR 405-092-013 $14.94SFR 405-092-014 $14.94SFR 405-092-015 $14.94SFR 405-092-016 $14.94SFR 405-092-017 $14.94SFR 405-092-018 $14.94SFR 405-092-019 $14.94SFR 405-092-020 $14.94SFR 405-092-021 $14.94SFR 405-092-022 $14.94SFR 405-092-023 $14.94SFR 405-093-001 $14.94SFR 405-093-002 $14.94SFR 405-093-003 $14.94SFR 405-093-004 $14.94SFR 405-093-005 $14.94SFR 405-093-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-093-007 $14.94SFR 405-093-008 $14.94SFR 405-093-009 $14.94SFR 405-093-010 $14.94SFR 405-093-011 $14.94SFR 405-093-012 $14.94SFR 405-093-013 $14.94SFR 405-093-014 $14.94SFR 405-093-015 $14.94SFR 405-093-016 $14.94SFR 405-093-017 $14.94SFR 405-093-018 $14.94SFR 405-093-019 $14.94SFR 405-093-020 $14.94SFR 405-093-021 $14.94SFR 405-093-022 $14.94SFR 405-094-001 $14.94SFR 405-094-002 $14.94SFR 405-094-003 $14.94SFR 405-094-004 $14.94SFR 405-094-005 $14.94SFR 405-094-006 $14.94SFR 405-094-007 $14.94SFR 405-094-008 $14.94SFR 405-094-009 $14.94SFR 405-094-010 $14.94SFR 405-101-001 $14.94SFR 405-101-002 $14.94SFR 405-101-003 $14.94SFR 405-102-001 $14.94SFR 405-102-002 $14.94SFR 405-102-003 $14.94SFR 405-102-004 $14.94SFR 405-102-005 $14.94SFR 405-102-006 $14.94SFR 405-103-001 $14.94SFR 405-103-002 $14.94SFR 405-103-003 $14.94SFR 405-103-004 $14.94SFR 405-103-005 $14.94SFR 405-103-006 $14.94SFR 405-103-007 $14.94SFR 405-103-008 $14.94SFR 405-103-009 $14.94SFR 405-103-010 $14.94SFR 405-103-011 $14.94SFR 405-103-012 $14.94SFR 405-103-013 $14.94SFR 405-103-014 $14.94SFR 405-103-015 $14.94SFR 405-103-016 $14.94SFR 405-103-017 $7.46VSFR - 193 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-103-018 $14.94SFR 405-103-019 $14.94SFR 405-103-020 $14.94SFR 405-103-021 $14.94SFR 405-103-022 $14.94SFR 405-103-023 $14.94SFR 405-103-024 $14.94SFR 405-103-025 $14.94SFR 405-103-026 $14.94SFR 405-104-001 $14.94SFR 405-104-002 $14.94SFR 405-104-003 $14.94SFR 405-104-004 $14.94SFR 405-104-005 $14.94SFR 405-104-006 $14.94SFR 405-104-007 $14.94SFR 405-104-008 $14.94SFR 405-104-009 $14.94SFR 405-104-010 $14.94SFR 405-104-011 $14.94SFR 405-104-012 $14.94SFR 405-104-013 $14.94SFR 405-104-014 $14.94SFR 405-104-015 $14.94SFR 405-104-016 $14.94SFR 405-104-017 $14.94SFR 405-104-018 $14.94SFR 405-104-019 $14.94SFR 405-104-020 $14.94SFR 405-104-021 $14.94SFR 405-104-022 $14.94SFR 405-104-023 $14.94SFR 405-104-024 $14.94SFR 405-104-025 $14.94SFR 405-104-026 $14.94SFR 405-104-027 $14.94SFR 405-104-028 $14.94SFR 405-104-029 $14.94SFR 405-104-030 $14.94SFR 405-111-001 $14.94SFR 405-111-002 $14.94SFR 405-111-003 $14.94SFR 405-111-004 $14.94SFR 405-111-005 $14.94SFR 405-111-006 $14.94SFR 405-111-007 $14.94SFR 405-111-008 $14.94SFR 405-111-009 $14.94SFR 405-111-010 $14.94SFR 405-111-011 $14.94SFR 405-111-012 $14.94SFR 405-111-013 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-111-014 $14.94SFR 405-111-015 $14.94SFR 405-111-016 $14.94SFR 405-111-017 $14.94SFR 405-111-018 $14.94SFR 405-111-019 $14.94SFR 405-111-020 $14.94SFR 405-111-021 $14.94SFR 405-111-022 $14.94SFR 405-111-023 $14.94SFR 405-111-024 $14.94SFR 405-111-025 $14.94SFR 405-111-026 $14.94SFR 405-111-027 $14.94SFR 405-111-028 $14.94SFR 405-111-029 $14.94SFR 405-111-030 $14.94SFR 405-111-031 $14.94SFR 405-111-032 $14.94SFR 405-111-033 $14.94SFR 405-112-001 $14.94SFR 405-112-002 $14.94SFR 405-112-003 $14.94SFR 405-112-004 $14.94SFR 405-112-005 $14.94SFR 405-112-006 $14.94SFR 405-112-007 $14.94SFR 405-112-008 $14.94SFR 405-112-009 $14.94SFR 405-112-010 $14.94SFR 405-112-011 $14.94SFR 405-112-012 $14.94SFR 405-112-013 $14.94SFR 405-112-014 $14.94SFR 405-112-015 $14.94SFR 405-112-016 $14.94SFR 405-112-017 $14.94SFR 405-112-018 $14.94SFR 405-112-019 $14.94SFR 405-112-020 $14.94SFR 405-112-021 $14.94SFR 405-112-022 $14.94SFR 405-112-023 $14.94SFR 405-112-024 $14.94SFR 405-112-025 $14.94SFR 405-112-026 $14.94SFR 405-112-027 $14.94SFR 405-112-028 $14.94SFR 405-112-029 $14.94SFR 405-112-030 $14.94SFR 405-112-031 $14.94SFR 405-112-032 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-112-033 $14.94SFR 405-112-034 $14.94SFR 405-113-002 $14.94SFR 405-113-003 $14.94SFR 405-113-004 $14.94SFR 405-113-005 $14.94SFR 405-113-006 $14.94SFR 405-113-007 $14.94SFR 405-113-008 $14.94SFR 405-113-009 $14.94SFR 405-113-010 $14.94SFR 405-113-011 $14.94SFR 405-113-012 $14.94SFR 405-113-013 $14.94SFR 405-113-014 $14.94SFR 405-113-015 $14.94SFR 405-113-016 $14.94SFR 405-122-001 $14.94SFR 405-122-002 $14.94SFR 405-122-003 $14.94SFR 405-122-004 $14.94SFR 405-122-005 $14.94SFR 405-122-008 $14.94SFR 405-122-009 $14.94SFR 405-122-010 $14.94SFR 405-122-011 $14.94SFR 405-122-012 $14.94SFR 405-122-013 $14.94SFR 405-122-014 $14.94SFR 405-122-015 $14.94SFR 405-122-016 $14.94SFR 405-122-017 $14.94SFR 405-122-018 $14.94SFR 405-122-019 $14.94SFR 405-122-020 $14.94SFR 405-122-021 $14.94SFR 405-122-022 $14.94SFR 405-122-023 $14.94SFR 405-122-024 $14.94SFR 405-122-025 $14.94SFR 405-122-026 $14.94SFR 405-122-032 $74.70IND 405-132-001 $14.94SFR 405-132-002 $14.94SFR 405-132-003 $14.94SFR 405-132-004 $14.94SFR 405-132-005 $14.94SFR 405-132-006 $14.94SFR 405-132-007 $14.94SFR 405-132-008 $14.94SFR 405-132-009 $14.94SFR 405-132-010 $14.94SFR - 194 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-132-011 $14.94SFR 405-132-012 $14.94SFR 405-132-013 $14.94SFR 405-132-014 $14.94SFR 405-132-015 $14.94SFR 405-132-016 $14.94SFR 405-132-017 $14.94SFR 405-132-018 $14.94SFR 405-132-019 $14.94SFR 405-132-020 $14.94SFR 405-132-021 $14.94SFR 405-132-022 $14.94SFR 405-132-023 $14.94SFR 405-132-024 $14.94SFR 405-132-025 $14.94SFR 405-132-026 $14.94SFR 405-132-027 $14.94SFR 405-132-028 $14.94SFR 405-132-029 $14.94SFR 405-132-030 $14.94SFR 405-133-001 $14.94SFR 405-133-002 $14.94SFR 405-133-003 $14.94SFR 405-133-004 $14.94SFR 405-133-005 $14.94SFR 405-133-006 $14.94SFR 405-133-007 $14.94SFR 405-133-008 $14.94SFR 405-133-009 $14.94SFR 405-133-010 $14.94SFR 405-133-011 $14.94SFR 405-133-012 $14.94SFR 405-133-013 $14.94SFR 405-133-014 $14.94SFR 405-133-015 $14.94SFR 405-133-016 $29.88MFR2 405-133-017 $14.94SFR 405-133-018 $14.94SFR 405-133-019 $14.94SFR 405-133-020 $14.94SFR 405-133-021 $14.94SFR 405-133-022 $14.94SFR 405-133-023 $14.94SFR 405-133-024 $14.94SFR 405-133-025 $14.94SFR 405-133-026 $14.94SFR 405-133-027 $14.94SFR 405-133-028 $14.94SFR 405-133-029 $14.94SFR 405-134-001 $14.94SFR 405-134-002 $14.94SFR 405-134-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-134-004 $14.94SFR 405-134-005 $14.94SFR 405-134-006 $14.94SFR 405-134-007 $14.94SFR 405-134-008 $14.94SFR 405-134-009 $14.94SFR 405-134-010 $14.94SFR 405-134-011 $14.94SFR 405-134-012 $14.94SFR 405-134-013 $14.94SFR 405-134-014 $14.94SFR 405-134-015 $14.94SFR 405-134-016 $14.94SFR 405-134-017 $14.94SFR 405-134-018 $14.94SFR 405-134-019 $14.94SFR 405-134-020 $14.94SFR 405-134-021 $14.94SFR 405-134-022 $14.94SFR 405-134-023 $14.94SFR 405-134-024 $14.94SFR 405-134-025 $14.94SFR 405-134-026 $14.94SFR 405-134-027 $14.94SFR 405-134-028 $14.94SFR 405-134-029 $14.94SFR 405-134-030 $14.94SFR 405-134-031 $14.94SFR 405-134-032 $14.94SFR 405-141-001 $74.70INST 405-141-003 $14.94SFR 405-141-004 $14.94SFR 405-141-005 $14.94SFR 405-141-006 $14.94SFR 405-141-007 $14.94SFR 405-141-008 $14.94SFR 405-141-009 $14.94SFR 405-141-010 $14.94SFR 405-141-011 $14.94SFR 405-141-012 $14.94SFR 405-141-013 $14.94SFR 405-141-014 $14.94SFR 405-141-015 $14.94SFR 405-141-016 $14.94SFR 405-141-017 $14.94SFR 405-141-018 $14.94SFR 405-141-019 $14.94SFR 405-141-020 $14.94SFR 405-141-021 $14.94SFR 405-141-022 $14.94SFR 405-141-023 $14.94SFR 405-141-024 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-141-025 $14.94SFR 405-142-001 $14.94SFR 405-142-002 $14.94SFR 405-142-003 $14.94SFR 405-142-004 $14.94SFR 405-142-005 $14.94SFR 405-142-006 $14.94SFR 405-142-007 $14.94SFR 405-142-008 $14.94SFR 405-142-009 $14.94SFR 405-142-010 $14.94SFR 405-142-011 $14.94SFR 405-142-012 $14.94SFR 405-143-001 $14.94SFR 405-143-002 $14.94SFR 405-143-003 $14.94SFR 405-143-004 $14.94SFR 405-143-005 $14.94SFR 405-143-006 $14.94SFR 405-143-007 $14.94SFR 405-143-008 $14.94SFR 405-143-009 $14.94SFR 405-143-010 $14.94SFR 405-143-011 $14.94SFR 405-143-012 $14.94SFR 405-143-013 $14.94SFR 405-143-014 $14.94SFR 405-143-015 $14.94SFR 405-143-016 $14.94SFR 405-143-017 $14.94SFR 405-143-018 $14.94SFR 405-143-019 $14.94SFR 405-143-020 $14.94SFR 405-143-021 $14.94SFR 405-143-022 $14.94SFR 405-143-023 $14.94SFR 405-143-024 $14.94SFR 405-151-001 $14.94SFR 405-151-002 $14.94SFR 405-151-003 $14.94SFR 405-151-004 $14.94SFR 405-151-005 $14.94SFR 405-151-006 $14.94SFR 405-151-007 $14.94SFR 405-151-008 $14.94SFR 405-151-009 $14.94SFR 405-151-010 $14.94SFR 405-151-011 $14.94SFR 405-151-012 $14.94SFR 405-151-013 $14.94SFR 405-151-014 $14.94SFR 405-151-015 $14.94SFR - 195 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-151-016 $14.94SFR 405-151-017 $14.94SFR 405-151-018 $14.94SFR 405-151-019 $14.94SFR 405-151-020 $14.94SFR 405-151-021 $14.94SFR 405-151-022 $14.94SFR 405-151-023 $14.94SFR 405-151-024 $14.94SFR 405-151-025 $14.94SFR 405-151-026 $14.94SFR 405-151-027 $14.94SFR 405-151-028 $14.94SFR 405-151-029 $14.94SFR 405-151-030 $14.94SFR 405-151-031 $14.94SFR 405-151-032 $14.94SFR 405-151-033 $14.94SFR 405-152-001 $14.94SFR 405-152-002 $14.94SFR 405-152-003 $14.94SFR 405-152-004 $14.94SFR 405-152-005 $14.94SFR 405-152-006 $14.94SFR 405-152-007 $14.94SFR 405-152-008 $7.46VSFR 405-152-009 $14.94SFR 405-152-010 $14.94SFR 405-152-011 $14.94SFR 405-152-012 $14.94SFR 405-152-013 $14.94SFR 405-152-014 $14.94SFR 405-153-001 $14.94SFR 405-153-002 $14.94SFR 405-153-003 $14.94SFR 405-154-001 $14.94SFR 405-154-002 $14.94SFR 405-154-003 $14.94SFR 405-154-004 $14.94SFR 405-154-005 $14.94SFR 405-155-001 $14.94SFR 405-155-002 $14.94SFR 405-155-003 $14.94SFR 405-155-004 $14.94SFR 405-155-005 $14.94SFR 405-156-001 $14.94SFR 405-156-002 $14.94SFR 405-156-003 $14.94SFR 405-156-004 $14.94SFR 405-156-005 $14.94SFR 405-156-006 $14.94SFR 405-156-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-156-008 $14.94SFR 405-156-009 $14.94SFR 405-156-010 $14.94SFR 405-156-011 $14.94SFR 405-156-012 $14.94SFR 405-156-013 $14.94SFR 405-161-002 $14.94SFR 405-161-003 $14.94SFR 405-161-004 $14.94SFR 405-161-005 $14.94SFR 405-161-006 $14.94SFR 405-161-007 $14.94SFR 405-161-008 $14.94SFR 405-161-009 $14.94SFR 405-161-010 $14.94SFR 405-161-011 $14.94SFR 405-161-012 $14.94SFR 405-161-013 $14.94SFR 405-161-014 $14.94SFR 405-161-015 $14.94SFR 405-161-016 $14.94SFR 405-161-017 $14.94SFR 405-161-018 $14.94SFR 405-161-019 $14.94SFR 405-161-020 $14.94SFR 405-161-021 $14.94SFR 405-161-022 $14.94SFR 405-161-023 $14.94SFR 405-162-001 $14.94SFR 405-162-002 $14.94SFR 405-162-003 $14.94SFR 405-162-004 $14.94SFR 405-162-005 $14.94SFR 405-162-006 $14.94SFR 405-162-007 $14.94SFR 405-162-008 $14.94SFR 405-162-009 $14.94SFR 405-162-010 $14.94SFR 405-162-011 $14.94SFR 405-162-012 $14.94SFR 405-162-013 $14.94SFR 405-162-014 $14.94SFR 405-162-015 $14.94SFR 405-162-016 $14.94SFR 405-162-017 $14.94SFR 405-162-018 $14.94SFR 405-162-019 $14.94SFR 405-162-020 $14.94SFR 405-163-001 $14.94SFR 405-163-002 $14.94SFR 405-163-003 $14.94SFR 405-163-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-163-005 $14.94SFR 405-163-006 $14.94SFR 405-163-007 $14.94SFR 405-163-008 $14.94SFR 405-163-009 $14.94SFR 405-163-010 $14.94SFR 405-163-011 $14.94SFR 405-163-012 $14.94SFR 405-163-013 $14.94SFR 405-163-014 $14.94SFR 405-163-015 $14.94SFR 405-163-016 $14.94SFR 405-163-017 $14.94SFR 405-163-018 $14.94SFR 405-163-019 $14.94SFR 405-163-020 $14.94SFR 405-163-021 $14.94SFR 405-163-022 $14.94SFR 405-163-023 $14.94SFR 405-163-024 $14.94SFR 405-163-025 $14.94SFR 405-163-026 $14.94SFR 405-163-027 $14.94SFR 405-163-028 $14.94SFR 405-163-029 $14.94SFR 405-163-030 $14.94SFR 405-163-031 $14.94SFR 405-164-001 $14.94SFR 405-164-002 $14.94SFR 405-164-003 $14.94SFR 405-164-004 $14.94SFR 405-164-005 $14.94SFR 405-164-006 $14.94SFR 405-164-007 $14.94SFR 405-164-008 $14.94SFR 405-164-009 $14.94SFR 405-164-010 $14.94SFR 405-164-011 $14.94SFR 405-164-012 $14.94SFR 405-164-013 $14.94SFR 405-164-014 $14.94SFR 405-164-015 $14.94SFR 405-164-016 $14.94SFR 405-164-017 $14.94SFR 405-164-018 $14.94SFR 405-164-019 $14.94SFR 405-164-020 $14.94SFR 405-164-021 $14.94SFR 405-164-022 $14.94SFR 405-164-023 $14.94SFR 405-170-004 $74.70COM 405-170-010 $119.52MFR8 - 196 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-191-001 $14.94SFR 405-191-002 $14.94SFR 405-191-003 $14.94SFR 405-191-004 $14.94SFR 405-191-005 $14.94SFR 405-191-006 $14.94SFR 405-191-007 $14.94SFR 405-191-008 $14.94SFR 405-191-009 $14.94SFR 405-191-010 $14.94SFR 405-191-011 $14.94SFR 405-191-012 $14.94SFR 405-191-013 $14.94SFR 405-192-001 $14.94SFR 405-192-002 $14.94SFR 405-192-003 $14.94SFR 405-192-004 $14.94SFR 405-192-005 $14.94SFR 405-192-006 $14.94SFR 405-192-007 $14.94SFR 405-192-008 $14.94SFR 405-192-009 $14.94SFR 405-192-010 $14.94SFR 405-192-011 $14.94SFR 405-193-001 $14.94SFR 405-193-002 $14.94SFR 405-193-003 $14.94SFR 405-193-004 $14.94SFR 405-193-005 $14.94SFR 405-193-006 $14.94SFR 405-193-007 $14.94SFR 405-193-008 $14.94SFR 405-193-009 $14.94SFR 405-193-010 $14.94SFR 405-193-011 $14.94SFR 405-193-012 $14.94SFR 405-193-013 $14.94SFR 405-193-014 $14.94SFR 405-193-015 $14.94SFR 405-193-016 $14.94SFR 405-193-017 $14.94SFR 405-193-018 $14.94SFR 405-193-019 $14.94SFR 405-193-020 $14.94SFR 405-193-021 $14.94SFR 405-194-001 $14.94SFR 405-194-002 $14.94SFR 405-194-003 $14.94SFR 405-194-004 $14.94SFR 405-194-005 $14.94SFR 405-194-006 $14.94SFR 405-194-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-194-008 $14.94SFR 405-194-009 $14.94SFR 405-194-010 $14.94SFR 405-194-011 $14.94SFR 405-194-012 $14.94SFR 405-194-013 $14.94SFR 405-194-014 $14.94SFR 405-194-015 $14.94SFR 405-194-016 $14.94SFR 405-194-017 $14.94SFR 405-194-018 $14.94SFR 405-194-019 $14.94SFR 405-194-020 $14.94SFR 405-201-001 $14.94SFR 405-201-002 $14.94SFR 405-201-003 $14.94SFR 405-201-004 $14.94SFR 405-202-001 $14.94SFR 405-202-002 $14.94SFR 405-202-003 $14.94SFR 405-202-004 $14.94SFR 405-202-005 $14.94SFR 405-202-006 $14.94SFR 405-202-007 $14.94SFR 405-202-008 $14.94SFR 405-202-009 $14.94SFR 405-202-010 $14.94SFR 405-202-011 $14.94SFR 405-202-012 $14.94SFR 405-202-013 $14.94SFR 405-202-014 $14.94SFR 405-202-015 $14.94SFR 405-202-016 $14.94SFR 405-202-017 $14.94SFR 405-202-018 $14.94SFR 405-203-001 $14.94SFR 405-203-002 $14.94SFR 405-203-003 $14.94SFR 405-203-004 $14.94SFR 405-203-005 $14.94SFR 405-203-006 $14.94SFR 405-203-007 $14.94SFR 405-203-008 $14.94SFR 405-203-012 $14.94SFR 405-203-013 $14.94SFR 405-203-014 $14.94SFR 405-203-015 $14.94SFR 405-203-016 $14.94SFR 405-203-017 $14.94SFR 405-203-018 $7.46VCOM 405-204-001 $14.94SFR 405-204-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-204-003 $14.94SFR 405-204-004 $14.94SFR 405-204-005 $14.94SFR 405-204-006 $14.94SFR 405-204-007 $14.94SFR 405-204-008 $14.94SFR 405-204-010 $14.94SFR 405-204-011 $14.94SFR 405-204-012 $14.94SFR 405-204-013 $14.94SFR 405-204-014 $14.94SFR 405-204-015 $14.94SFR 405-204-016 $14.94SFR 405-204-017 $14.94SFR 405-204-018 $14.94SFR 405-204-019 $14.94SFR 405-204-020 $14.94SFR 405-204-021 $14.94SFR 405-204-022 $14.94SFR 405-211-001 $14.94SFR 405-211-002 $14.94SFR 405-211-003 $14.94SFR 405-211-004 $14.94SFR 405-211-005 $14.94SFR 405-211-006 $14.94SFR 405-211-007 $14.94SFR 405-211-008 $14.94SFR 405-211-009 $14.94SFR 405-211-010 $14.94SFR 405-211-011 $14.94SFR 405-211-012 $14.94SFR 405-211-013 $14.94SFR 405-211-014 $14.94SFR 405-211-015 $14.94SFR 405-211-016 $14.94SFR 405-211-017 $14.94SFR 405-211-018 $14.94SFR 405-211-019 $14.94SFR 405-211-020 $14.94SFR 405-211-021 $14.94SFR 405-211-022 $14.94SFR 405-211-023 $14.94SFR 405-211-024 $14.94SFR 405-211-025 $14.94SFR 405-211-026 $14.94SFR 405-211-027 $14.94SFR 405-211-028 $14.94SFR 405-211-029 $14.94SFR 405-211-030 $14.94SFR 405-211-031 $14.94SFR 405-211-032 $14.94SFR 405-211-033 $14.94SFR - 197 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-211-034 $14.94SFR 405-211-035 $14.94SFR 405-211-036 $14.94SFR 405-211-037 $14.94SFR 405-211-038 $14.94SFR 405-211-039 $14.94SFR 405-211-040 $14.94SFR 405-211-041 $14.94SFR 405-212-001 $14.94SFR 405-212-002 $14.94SFR 405-212-003 $14.94SFR 405-212-004 $14.94SFR 405-212-005 $14.94SFR 405-212-006 $14.94SFR 405-212-007 $14.94SFR 405-212-008 $14.94SFR 405-212-009 $14.94SFR 405-212-010 $14.94SFR 405-212-011 $14.94SFR 405-212-012 $14.94SFR 405-212-013 $14.94SFR 405-212-014 $14.94SFR 405-212-015 $14.94SFR 405-212-016 $14.94SFR 405-212-017 $14.94SFR 405-212-018 $14.94SFR 405-212-019 $14.94SFR 405-213-001 $14.94SFR 405-213-002 $14.94SFR 405-213-003 $14.94SFR 405-213-004 $14.94SFR 405-213-005 $14.94SFR 405-213-006 $14.94SFR 405-213-007 $14.94SFR 405-213-008 $14.94SFR 405-213-009 $14.94SFR 405-213-010 $14.94SFR 405-213-011 $14.94SFR 405-221-001 $14.94SFR 405-221-002 $14.94SFR 405-221-003 $14.94SFR 405-221-004 $14.94SFR 405-221-005 $14.94SFR 405-221-006 $14.94SFR 405-221-007 $14.94SFR 405-221-008 $14.94SFR 405-221-009 $14.94SFR 405-221-010 $14.94SFR 405-221-011 $14.94SFR 405-221-012 $14.94SFR 405-221-013 $14.94SFR 405-221-014 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-221-015 $14.94SFR 405-221-016 $14.94SFR 405-221-017 $14.94SFR 405-221-018 $14.94SFR 405-221-019 $14.94SFR 405-221-020 $14.94SFR 405-221-021 $14.94SFR 405-221-022 $14.94SFR 405-221-023 $14.94SFR 405-221-024 $14.94SFR 405-221-025 $14.94SFR 405-221-026 $14.94SFR 405-221-027 $14.94SFR 405-221-028 $14.94SFR 405-222-001 $14.94SFR 405-222-002 $14.94SFR 405-222-003 $14.94SFR 405-222-004 $14.94SFR 405-222-005 $14.94SFR 405-222-006 $14.94SFR 405-222-007 $14.94SFR 405-222-008 $14.94SFR 405-222-009 $14.94SFR 405-222-010 $14.94SFR 405-222-011 $14.94SFR 405-222-012 $14.94SFR 405-222-013 $14.94SFR 405-222-014 $14.94SFR 405-231-001 $14.94SFR 405-231-002 $14.94SFR 405-231-003 $14.94SFR 405-231-004 $14.94SFR 405-231-005 $14.94SFR 405-231-006 $14.94SFR 405-231-007 $14.94SFR 405-231-008 $14.94SFR 405-231-009 $14.94SFR 405-231-010 $14.94SFR 405-231-011 $14.94SFR 405-231-012 $14.94SFR 405-231-013 $14.94SFR 405-231-014 $14.94SFR 405-231-015 $14.94SFR 405-232-001 $14.94SFR 405-232-002 $14.94SFR 405-232-003 $14.94SFR 405-232-004 $14.94SFR 405-232-005 $14.94SFR 405-232-006 $14.94SFR 405-232-007 $14.94SFR 405-232-008 $14.94SFR 405-232-009 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-232-010 $14.94SFR 405-232-011 $14.94SFR 405-232-012 $14.94SFR 405-232-013 $14.94SFR 405-232-014 $14.94SFR 405-232-015 $14.94SFR 405-232-016 $14.94SFR 405-232-017 $14.94SFR 405-232-018 $14.94SFR 405-232-019 $14.94SFR 405-232-020 $14.94SFR 405-232-021 $14.94SFR 405-232-022 $14.94SFR 405-232-023 $14.94SFR 405-232-024 $14.94SFR 405-232-025 $14.94SFR 405-232-026 $14.94SFR 405-232-027 $14.94SFR 405-232-028 $14.94SFR 405-232-029 $14.94SFR 405-232-030 $14.94SFR 405-232-031 $14.94SFR 405-232-032 $14.94SFR 405-232-033 $14.94SFR 405-232-034 $14.94SFR 405-232-035 $14.94SFR 405-233-001 $14.94SFR 405-233-002 $14.94SFR 405-233-003 $14.94SFR 405-233-004 $14.94SFR 405-233-005 $14.94SFR 405-233-006 $14.94SFR 405-233-007 $14.94SFR 405-233-008 $14.94SFR 405-233-009 $14.94SFR 405-233-010 $14.94SFR 405-233-011 $14.94SFR 405-233-012 $14.94SFR 405-233-013 $14.94SFR 405-233-014 $14.94SFR 405-233-015 $14.94SFR 405-233-016 $14.94SFR 405-233-017 $14.94SFR 405-233-018 $14.94SFR 405-233-019 $14.94SFR 405-233-020 $14.94SFR 405-233-021 $14.94SFR 405-233-022 $14.94SFR 405-233-023 $14.94SFR 405-233-024 $14.94SFR 405-233-025 $14.94SFR 405-233-026 $14.94SFR - 198 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-233-027 $14.94SFR 405-233-028 $14.94SFR 405-233-029 $14.94SFR 405-241-001 $14.94SFR 405-241-002 $14.94SFR 405-241-003 $14.94SFR 405-241-004 $14.94SFR 405-241-005 $14.94SFR 405-241-006 $14.94SFR 405-241-007 $14.94SFR 405-241-008 $14.94SFR 405-241-009 $14.94SFR 405-241-010 $14.94SFR 405-242-001 $14.94SFR 405-242-002 $14.94SFR 405-242-003 $14.94SFR 405-242-004 $14.94SFR 405-242-005 $14.94SFR 405-242-006 $14.94SFR 405-242-007 $14.94SFR 405-242-008 $14.94SFR 405-242-009 $14.94SFR 405-242-010 $14.94SFR 405-242-011 $14.94SFR 405-242-012 $14.94SFR 405-242-013 $14.94SFR 405-242-014 $14.94SFR 405-242-015 $14.94SFR 405-242-016 $14.94SFR 405-242-017 $14.94SFR 405-242-018 $14.94SFR 405-242-019 $14.94SFR 405-242-020 $14.94SFR 405-243-001 $14.94SFR 405-243-002 $14.94SFR 405-243-003 $14.94SFR 405-243-004 $14.94SFR 405-243-005 $14.94SFR 405-243-006 $14.94SFR 405-243-007 $14.94SFR 405-243-008 $14.94SFR 405-243-009 $14.94SFR 405-243-010 $14.94SFR 405-243-011 $14.94SFR 405-243-012 $14.94SFR 405-243-013 $14.94SFR 405-243-014 $14.94SFR 405-243-015 $14.94SFR 405-243-016 $14.94SFR 405-243-017 $14.94SFR 405-243-018 $14.94SFR 405-243-019 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-243-020 $14.94SFR 405-244-001 $14.94SFR 405-244-002 $14.94SFR 405-244-003 $14.94SFR 405-244-004 $14.94SFR 405-244-005 $14.94SFR 405-244-006 $14.94SFR 405-244-007 $14.94SFR 405-244-008 $14.94SFR 405-244-009 $14.94SFR 405-244-010 $14.94SFR 405-244-011 $14.94SFR 405-244-012 $14.94SFR 405-244-013 $14.94SFR 405-244-014 $14.94SFR 405-244-015 $14.94SFR 405-244-016 $14.94SFR 405-244-017 $14.94SFR 405-244-018 $14.94SFR 405-244-019 $14.94SFR 405-244-020 $14.94SFR 405-244-021 $14.94SFR 405-244-022 $14.94SFR 405-244-023 $14.94SFR 405-244-024 $14.94SFR 405-244-025 $14.94SFR 405-244-026 $14.94SFR 405-244-027 $14.94SFR 405-244-028 $14.94SFR 405-244-029 $14.94SFR 405-244-030 $14.94SFR 405-244-031 $14.94SFR 405-244-032 $14.94SFR 405-251-001 $14.94SFR 405-251-002 $14.94SFR 405-251-003 $14.94SFR 405-251-004 $14.94SFR 405-251-005 $14.94SFR 405-251-006 $14.94SFR 405-251-007 $14.94SFR 405-251-008 $14.94SFR 405-251-009 $14.94SFR 405-251-010 $14.94SFR 405-251-011 $14.94SFR 405-251-012 $14.94SFR 405-251-013 $14.94SFR 405-251-014 $14.94SFR 405-251-015 $14.94SFR 405-251-016 $14.94SFR 405-251-017 $14.94SFR 405-251-018 $14.94SFR 405-252-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-252-002 $14.94SFR 405-252-003 $14.94SFR 405-252-004 $14.94SFR 405-252-005 $14.94SFR 405-252-006 $14.94SFR 405-252-007 $14.94SFR 405-252-008 $14.94SFR 405-252-009 $14.94SFR 405-252-010 $14.94SFR 405-252-011 $14.94SFR 405-252-012 $14.94SFR 405-252-013 $14.94SFR 405-252-014 $14.94SFR 405-252-015 $14.94SFR 405-252-016 $14.94SFR 405-252-017 $14.94SFR 405-252-018 $14.94SFR 405-252-019 $14.94SFR 405-252-020 $14.94SFR 405-252-021 $14.94SFR 405-252-022 $14.94SFR 405-252-023 $14.94SFR 405-252-024 $14.94SFR 405-252-025 $14.94SFR 405-252-026 $14.94SFR 405-252-027 $14.94SFR 405-252-028 $14.94SFR 405-252-029 $14.94SFR 405-253-001 $14.94SFR 405-253-002 $14.94SFR 405-253-003 $14.94SFR 405-253-004 $14.94SFR 405-253-005 $14.94SFR 405-253-006 $14.94SFR 405-253-007 $14.94SFR 405-253-008 $14.94SFR 405-253-009 $14.94SFR 405-253-010 $14.94SFR 405-253-011 $14.94SFR 405-253-012 $14.94SFR 405-253-013 $14.94SFR 405-253-014 $14.94SFR 405-253-015 $14.94SFR 405-253-016 $14.94SFR 405-253-017 $14.94SFR 405-253-018 $14.94SFR 405-253-019 $14.94SFR 405-253-020 $14.94SFR 405-253-021 $14.94SFR 405-254-001 $14.94SFR 405-254-002 $14.94SFR 405-254-003 $14.94SFR - 199 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 405-254-004 $14.94SFR 405-254-005 $14.94SFR 405-254-006 $14.94SFR 405-254-007 $14.94SFR 405-254-008 $14.94SFR 405-254-009 $14.94SFR 405-254-010 $14.94SFR 405-254-011 $14.94SFR 405-254-012 $14.94SFR 405-254-013 $14.94SFR 405-254-014 $14.94SFR 405-254-015 $14.94SFR 405-255-001 $14.94SFR 405-255-002 $14.94SFR 405-255-003 $14.94SFR 405-255-004 $14.94SFR 405-255-005 $14.94SFR 405-256-001 $14.94SFR 405-261-001 $14.94SFR 405-261-002 $14.94SFR 405-261-003 $14.94SFR 405-261-004 $14.94SFR 405-261-005 $14.94SFR 405-261-006 $14.94SFR 405-261-007 $14.94SFR 405-261-008 $14.94SFR 405-261-009 $14.94SFR 405-261-010 $14.94SFR 405-261-011 $14.94SFR 405-261-012 $14.94SFR 405-261-013 $14.94SFR 405-262-001 $14.94SFR 405-262-002 $14.94SFR 405-263-001 $14.94SFR 405-263-002 $14.94SFR 405-263-003 $14.94SFR 405-263-004 $14.94SFR 405-263-005 $14.94SFR 405-263-006 $14.94SFR 405-263-007 $14.94SFR 405-263-008 $14.94SFR 405-263-009 $14.94SFR 405-263-010 $14.94SFR 408-082-001 $74.70IND 408-090-035 $74.70VIND 408-090-042 $74.70IND 408-090-046 $74.70VIND 408-090-047 $74.70IND 408-170-014 $74.70IND 408-170-017 $74.70IND 408-170-024 $74.70IND 408-170-046 $74.70VIND Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 408-170-048 $74.70IND 408-170-049 $74.70IND 408-170-050 $74.70IND 408-170-051 $74.70VIND 408-170-072 $7.46VSFR 408-180-010 $7.46VSFR 408-190-049 $74.70COM 408-190-052 $7.46VCOM 408-190-053 $74.70VIND 408-190-054 $74.70VIND 408-202-004 $74.70IND 408-202-006 $74.70VIND 408-203-009 $74.70VIND 408-203-012 $74.70COM 408-203-013 $74.70VIND 408-230-001 $14.94SFR 408-230-002 $14.94SFR 408-230-003 $14.94SFR 408-230-004 $14.94SFR 408-230-005 $14.94SFR 408-230-006 $14.94SFR 408-230-007 $14.94SFR 408-230-008 $14.94SFR 408-230-009 $14.94SFR 408-230-010 $14.94SFR 408-230-011 $14.94SFR 408-230-012 $14.94SFR 408-230-013 $14.94SFR 408-230-014 $14.94SFR 408-230-015 $14.94SFR 408-230-016 $14.94SFR 408-230-017 $14.94SFR 408-230-018 $14.94SFR 408-230-019 $14.94SFR 408-230-020 $14.94SFR 408-230-021 $14.94SFR 408-230-022 $14.94SFR 408-230-023 $14.94SFR 408-230-024 $14.94SFR 408-230-025 $14.94SFR 408-230-026 $14.94SFR 408-230-027 $14.94SFR 408-230-028 $14.94SFR 408-230-029 $14.94SFR 408-230-030 $14.94SFR 408-230-031 $14.94SFR 408-230-032 $14.94SFR 408-230-033 $14.94SFR 408-230-034 $14.94SFR 408-230-035 $14.94SFR 408-230-036 $14.94SFR 408-230-037 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 408-230-038 $14.94SFR 408-230-039 $14.94SFR 408-230-040 $14.94SFR 408-230-041 $14.94SFR 408-230-042 $14.94SFR 408-230-043 $14.94SFR 408-230-044 $14.94SFR 408-230-045 $14.94SFR 408-230-046 $14.94SFR 408-230-047 $14.94SFR 408-230-048 $14.94SFR 408-230-049 $14.94SFR 408-230-050 $14.94SFR 408-230-051 $14.94SFR 408-230-052 $14.94SFR 408-230-053 $14.94SFR 408-230-054 $14.94SFR 408-230-055 $14.94SFR 408-230-056 $14.94SFR 408-230-057 $14.94SFR 408-230-058 $14.94SFR 408-230-059 $14.94SFR 408-230-060 $14.94SFR 408-230-061 $14.94SFR 408-230-062 $14.94SFR 408-230-063 $14.94SFR 408-230-064 $14.94SFR 408-230-065 $14.94SFR 408-230-066 $14.94SFR 408-230-067 $14.94SFR 408-230-068 $14.94SFR 408-230-069 $14.94SFR 408-230-070 $14.94SFR 408-230-071 $14.94SFR 408-230-072 $14.94SFR 408-230-073 $14.94SFR 408-230-074 $14.94SFR 408-230-075 $14.94SFR 408-230-076 $14.94SFR 408-230-077 $14.94SFR 408-230-078 $14.94SFR 408-230-079 $14.94SFR 408-230-080 $14.94SFR 408-230-081 $14.94SFR 408-230-082 $14.94SFR 408-230-083 $14.94SFR 408-230-084 $14.94SFR 408-230-085 $14.94SFR 408-230-086 $14.94SFR 408-230-087 $14.94SFR 408-240-001 $14.94SFR 408-240-002 $14.94SFR - 200 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 408-240-003 $14.94SFR 408-240-004 $14.94SFR 408-240-005 $14.94SFR 408-240-006 $14.94SFR 408-240-007 $14.94SFR 408-240-008 $14.94SFR 408-240-009 $14.94SFR 408-240-010 $14.94SFR 408-240-011 $14.94SFR 408-240-012 $14.94SFR 408-240-013 $14.94SFR 408-240-014 $14.94SFR 408-240-015 $14.94SFR 408-240-016 $14.94SFR 408-240-017 $14.94SFR 408-240-018 $14.94SFR 408-240-019 $14.94SFR 408-240-020 $14.94SFR 408-240-021 $14.94SFR 408-240-022 $14.94SFR 408-240-023 $14.94SFR 408-240-024 $14.94SFR 408-240-025 $14.94SFR 408-240-026 $14.94SFR 408-240-027 $14.94SFR 408-240-028 $14.94SFR 408-240-029 $14.94SFR 408-240-030 $14.94SFR 408-240-031 $14.94SFR 408-240-032 $14.94SFR 408-240-033 $14.94SFR 408-240-034 $14.94SFR 408-240-035 $14.94SFR 408-240-036 $14.94SFR 408-240-037 $14.94SFR 408-240-038 $14.94SFR 408-240-039 $14.94SFR 408-240-040 $14.94SFR 408-240-041 $14.94SFR 408-240-042 $14.94SFR 408-240-043 $14.94SFR 408-240-044 $14.94SFR 408-240-045 $14.94SFR 408-240-046 $14.94SFR 408-240-047 $14.94SFR 408-240-048 $14.94SFR 408-240-049 $14.94SFR 408-240-050 $14.94SFR 408-240-051 $14.94SFR 408-240-052 $14.94SFR 408-240-053 $14.94SFR 408-240-054 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 408-240-055 $14.94SFR 408-240-056 $14.94SFR 408-240-057 $14.94SFR 408-240-058 $14.94SFR 408-240-059 $14.94SFR 408-240-060 $14.94SFR 408-240-061 $14.94SFR 408-240-062 $14.94SFR 408-240-063 $14.94SFR 408-240-064 $14.94SFR 408-240-065 $14.94SFR 408-240-066 $14.94SFR 408-240-067 $14.94SFR 408-240-068 $14.94SFR 408-240-069 $14.94SFR 408-240-070 $14.94SFR 408-240-071 $14.94SFR 408-240-072 $14.94SFR 408-240-073 $14.94SFR 408-240-074 $14.94SFR 408-240-075 $14.94SFR 408-240-076 $14.94SFR 408-240-077 $14.94SFR 408-240-078 $14.94SFR 408-240-079 $14.94SFR 408-240-080 $14.94SFR 408-240-081 $14.94SFR 408-240-082 $14.94SFR 408-240-083 $14.94SFR 408-240-084 $14.94SFR 408-240-085 $14.94SFR 408-240-086 $14.94SFR 408-240-087 $14.94SFR 408-240-088 $14.94SFR 408-240-089 $14.94SFR 408-240-090 $14.94SFR 408-240-091 $14.94SFR 408-240-092 $14.94SFR 408-240-093 $14.94SFR 408-240-094 $14.94SFR 408-250-001 $14.94SFR 408-250-002 $14.94SFR 408-250-003 $14.94SFR 408-250-004 $14.94SFR 408-250-005 $14.94SFR 408-250-006 $14.94SFR 408-250-007 $14.94SFR 408-250-008 $14.94SFR 408-250-009 $14.94SFR 408-250-010 $14.94SFR 408-250-011 $14.94SFR 408-250-012 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 408-250-013 $14.94SFR 408-250-014 $14.94SFR 408-250-015 $14.94SFR 408-250-016 $14.94SFR 408-250-017 $14.94SFR 408-250-018 $14.94SFR 408-250-019 $14.94SFR 408-250-020 $14.94SFR 408-250-021 $14.94SFR 408-250-022 $14.94SFR 408-250-023 $14.94SFR 408-250-024 $14.94SFR 408-250-025 $14.94SFR 408-250-026 $14.94SFR 408-250-027 $14.94SFR 408-250-028 $14.94SFR 408-250-029 $14.94SFR 408-250-030 $14.94SFR 408-250-031 $14.94SFR 408-250-032 $14.94SFR 408-250-033 $14.94SFR 408-250-034 $14.94SFR 408-250-035 $14.94SFR 408-250-036 $14.94SFR 408-250-037 $14.94SFR 408-250-038 $14.94SFR 408-250-039 $14.94SFR 408-250-040 $14.94SFR 408-250-041 $14.94SFR 408-250-042 $14.94SFR 408-250-043 $14.94SFR 408-250-044 $14.94SFR 408-250-045 $14.94SFR 408-250-046 $14.94SFR 408-250-047 $14.94SFR 408-250-048 $14.94SFR 408-250-049 $14.94SFR 408-250-050 $14.94SFR 408-250-051 $14.94SFR 408-250-052 $14.94SFR 408-250-053 $14.94SFR 408-250-054 $14.94SFR 408-250-055 $14.94SFR 408-250-056 $14.94SFR 408-250-057 $14.94SFR 408-250-058 $14.94SFR 408-250-059 $14.94SFR 408-250-060 $14.94SFR 408-250-061 $14.94SFR 408-250-062 $14.94SFR 408-250-063 $14.94SFR 408-250-064 $14.94SFR - 201 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 408-250-065 $14.94SFR 408-250-066 $14.94SFR 408-250-067 $14.94SFR 408-250-068 $14.94SFR 408-250-069 $14.94SFR 408-250-070 $14.94SFR 408-250-071 $14.94SFR 408-250-072 $14.94SFR 408-250-073 $14.94SFR 408-250-074 $14.94SFR 408-250-075 $14.94SFR 408-250-076 $14.94SFR 408-250-077 $14.94SFR 408-250-078 $14.94SFR 408-250-079 $14.94SFR 408-260-001 $7.46CONDO 408-260-002 $7.46CONDO 408-260-003 $7.46CONDO 408-260-004 $7.46CONDO 408-260-005 $7.46CONDO 408-260-006 $7.46CONDO 408-260-008 $7.46CONDO 408-260-009 $7.46CONDO 408-260-010 $7.46CONDO 408-260-011 $7.46CONDO 408-260-012 $7.46CONDO 408-260-013 $7.46CONDO 408-260-014 $7.46CONDO 409-011-001 $14.94SFR 409-011-002 $29.88MFR2 409-011-003 $14.94SFR 409-011-004 $29.88MFR2 409-011-007 $14.94SFR 409-011-008 $14.94SFR 409-011-009 $14.94SFR 409-011-010 $14.94SFR 409-011-011 $7.46VSFR 409-011-012 $7.46VSFR 409-012-017 $7.46VMFR 409-012-019 $14.94SFR 409-012-020 $14.94SFR 409-012-021 $14.94SFR 409-012-022 $14.94SFR 409-012-023 $14.94SFR 409-012-024 $14.94SFR 409-012-025 $14.94SFR 409-012-026 $14.94SFR 409-012-027 $14.94SFR 409-021-001 $7.46VSFR 409-021-002 $14.94SFR 409-021-003 $14.94SFR 409-021-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-021-005 $14.94SFR 409-021-006 $14.94SFR 409-021-007 $7.46VSFR 409-021-008 $7.46VSFR 409-021-009 $14.94SFR 409-021-010 $7.46VSFR 409-021-011 $14.94SFR 409-021-012 $14.94SFR 409-021-013 $29.88MFR2 409-021-014 $74.70INST 409-021-019 $14.94SFR 409-021-026 $14.94SFR 409-021-027 $7.46VSFR 409-021-028 $7.46VSFR 409-021-029 $14.94SFR 409-021-032 $7.46VSFR 409-021-033 $14.94SFR 409-021-034 $7.46VSFR 409-021-035 $14.94SFR 409-021-036 $14.94SFR 409-021-037 $7.46VSFR 409-021-038 $14.94SFR 409-021-039 $14.94SFR 409-021-040 $7.46VSFR 409-021-041 $7.46VSFR 409-022-001 $14.94SFR 409-022-004 $14.94SFR 409-022-005 $29.88MFR2 409-022-006 $59.76MFR4 409-022-007 $14.94SFR 409-022-009 $74.70MFR5 409-022-010 $14.94SFR 409-022-014 $14.94SFR 409-022-015 $44.82MFR 409-022-016 $14.94SFR 409-022-022 $14.94SFR 409-022-023 $14.94SFR 409-022-024 $14.94SFR 409-022-025 $14.94SFR 409-022-026 $14.94SFR 409-022-027 $14.94SFR 409-022-028 $14.94SFR 409-022-029 $14.94SFR 409-022-030 $14.94SFR 409-022-031 $14.94SFR 409-022-032 $14.94SFR 409-022-033 $14.94SFR 409-022-034 $14.94SFR 409-022-035 $7.46VSFR 409-022-036 $14.94SFR 409-022-037 $14.94SFR 409-022-038 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-031-001 $14.94SFR 409-031-002 $14.94SFR 409-031-003 $14.94SFR 409-031-004 $7.46VSFR 409-031-005 $14.94SFR 409-031-006 $14.94SFR 409-031-007 $14.94SFR 409-031-008 $14.94SFR 409-031-009 $14.94SFR 409-031-013 $14.94SFR 409-031-014 $14.94SFR 409-031-015 $14.94SFR 409-031-016 $14.94SFR 409-032-001 $14.94SFR 409-032-002 $14.94SFR 409-032-003 $14.94SFR 409-032-004 $14.94SFR 409-032-005 $14.94SFR 409-032-006 $7.46VSFR 409-032-007 $14.94SFR 409-032-008 $14.94SFR 409-032-009 $14.94SFR 409-032-010 $14.94SFR 409-032-011 $29.88MFR2 409-032-012 $14.94SFR 409-032-013 $7.46VSFR 409-032-014 $59.76MFR4 409-032-015 $7.46VSFR 409-032-016 $14.94SFR 409-032-019 $7.46VMFR 409-032-021 $14.94SFR 409-032-022 $14.94SFR 409-032-023 $14.94SFR 409-032-024 $14.94SFR 409-032-026 $14.94SFR 409-032-027 $14.94SFR 409-032-028 $14.94SFR 409-032-029 $14.94SFR 409-032-030 $14.94SFR 409-032-031 $14.94SFR 409-032-032 $14.94SFR 409-032-033 $14.94SFR 409-033-001 $7.46VSFR 409-033-002 $14.94SFR 409-033-003 $14.94SFR 409-033-005 $14.94SFR 409-033-006 $14.94SFR 409-033-008 $14.94SFR 409-033-009 $14.94SFR 409-033-010 $14.94SFR 409-033-011 $14.94SFR 409-033-012 $7.46VSFR - 202 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-033-013 $14.94SFR 409-033-017 $14.94SFR 409-033-018 $14.94SFR 409-033-019 $14.94SFR 409-033-020 $14.94SFR 409-033-021 $14.94SFR 409-033-023 $7.46VSFR 409-033-024 $14.94SFR 409-033-025 $7.46VSFR 409-033-027 $14.94SFR 409-033-028 $14.94SFR 409-033-029 $14.94SFR 409-033-030 $14.94SFR 409-033-031 $14.94SFR 409-033-032 $14.94SFR 409-041-004 $14.94SFR 409-041-005 $29.88MFR2 409-041-006 $7.46VSFR 409-041-007 $14.94SFR 409-041-008 $14.94SFR 409-041-012 $7.46VSFR 409-041-013 $14.94SFR 409-041-014 $14.94SFR 409-041-015 $7.46VSFR 409-041-018 $14.94SFR 409-041-019 $14.94SFR 409-041-020 $7.46VSFR 409-041-021 $14.94SFR 409-041-022 $14.94SFR 409-042-004 $14.94SFR 409-042-006 $14.94SFR 409-042-007 $14.94SFR 409-042-008 $14.94SFR 409-042-009 $29.88MFR2 409-042-010 $14.94SFR 409-042-011 $7.46VSFR 409-042-013 $7.46VSFR 409-042-014 $74.70VIND 409-042-015 $14.94SFR 409-042-016 $74.70COM 409-042-017 $29.88MFR2 409-042-021 $7.46VSFR 409-042-022 $7.46VSFR 409-042-023 $14.94SFR 409-042-024 $14.94SFR 409-042-025 $7.46VSFR 409-051-001 $44.82MFR 409-051-002 $7.46VSFR 409-051-003 $14.94SFR 409-051-004 $14.94SFR 409-051-007 $14.94SFR 409-051-008 $7.46VCOM Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-051-009 $29.88MFR2 409-051-010 $14.94SFR 409-051-013 $14.94SFR 409-051-014 $29.88MFR2 409-051-015 $29.88MFR2 409-051-016 $14.94SFR 409-051-017 $29.88MFR2 409-051-018 $14.94SFR 409-052-002 $14.94SFR 409-052-006 $14.94SFR 409-052-007 $14.94SFR 409-052-010 $14.94SFR 409-052-011 $14.94SFR 409-052-012 $14.94SFR 409-060-004 $14.94SFR 409-060-007 $29.88MFR2 409-060-008 $14.94SFR 409-060-013 $7.46VMFR 409-060-014 $14.94SFR 409-060-015 $29.88MFR2 409-060-017 $14.94SFR 409-060-021 $14.94SFR 409-060-022 $14.94SFR 409-060-025 $14.94SFR 409-060-028 $14.94SFR 409-060-029 $7.46VSFR 409-060-030 $14.94SFR 409-060-031 $14.94SFR 409-060-032 $14.94SFR 409-060-033 $14.94SFR 409-060-034 $14.94SFR 409-060-035 $14.94SFR 409-060-036 $14.94SFR 409-060-037 $29.88MFR2 409-060-038 $14.94SFR 409-060-039 $14.94SFR 409-060-040 $14.94SFR 409-060-041 $14.94SFR 409-060-042 $14.94SFR 409-060-043 $7.46VSFR 409-060-044 $7.46VSFR 409-070-010 $74.70INST 409-070-027 $104.58MFR7 409-070-028 $74.70COM 409-080-002 $14.94SFR 409-080-005 $7.46VSFR 409-080-006 $14.94SFR 409-080-007 $14.94SFR 409-080-008 $44.82MFR 409-080-009 $14.94SFR 409-080-010 $29.88MFR2 409-080-012 $74.70COM Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-080-019 $14.94SFR 409-080-021 $14.94SFR 409-080-022 $14.94SFR 409-080-023 $14.94SFR 409-080-024 $14.94SFR 409-080-025 $14.94SFR 409-080-028 $7.46VCOM 409-090-001 $14.94SFR 409-090-004 $14.94SFR 409-090-005 $14.94SFR 409-090-006 $14.94SFR 409-090-007 $14.94SFR 409-090-009 $14.94SFR 409-090-020 $14.94SFR 409-090-022 $14.94SFR 409-090-023 $14.94SFR 409-090-025 $14.94SFR 409-090-026 $14.94SFR 409-090-027 $14.94SFR 409-090-028 $14.94SFR 409-090-031 $14.94SFR 409-090-032 $74.70INST 409-100-005 $14.94SFR 409-100-006 $14.94SFR 409-100-007 $14.94SFR 409-100-010 $14.94SFR 409-100-014 $14.94SFR 409-100-018 $74.70INST 409-100-023 $14.94SFR 409-100-024 $14.94SFR 409-100-025 $14.94SFR 409-100-027 $14.94SFR 409-100-028 $14.94SFR 409-100-029 $29.88MFR2 409-100-030 $14.94SFR 409-110-001 $14.94SFR 409-110-002 $74.70MFR5 409-110-003 $14.94SFR 409-110-004 $59.76MFR4 409-110-005 $7.46VSFR 409-110-006 $14.94SFR 409-110-008 $14.94SFR 409-110-009 $14.94SFR 409-110-010 $14.94SFR 409-110-011 $74.70COM 409-110-012 $14.94SFR 409-110-013 $14.94SFR 409-110-014 $29.88MFR2 409-110-016 $14.94SFR 409-110-017 $14.94SFR 409-110-018 $14.94SFR 409-110-019 $14.94SFR - 203 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-120-003 $14.94SFR 409-120-004 $14.94SFR 409-120-006 $29.88MFR2 409-120-007 $14.94SFR 409-120-008 $14.94SFR 409-120-009 $14.94SFR 409-120-011 $7.46VMFR 409-120-012 $7.46VSFR 409-120-016 $14.94SFR 409-120-018 $14.94SFR 409-120-019 $14.94SFR 409-120-020 $14.94SFR 409-120-021 $14.94SFR 409-120-023 $14.94SFR 409-120-024 $14.94SFR 409-131-001 $74.70IND 409-131-002 $74.70IND 409-131-006 $29.88MFR2 409-131-007 $29.88MFR2 409-131-008 $14.94SFR 409-131-009 $14.94SFR 409-131-010 $7.46VMFR 409-131-011 $14.94SFR 409-131-013 $14.94SFR 409-131-014 $7.46VSFR 409-131-015 $7.46VSFR 409-131-017 $14.94SFR 409-131-018 $14.94SFR 409-131-019 $74.70VIND 409-131-022 $14.94SFR 409-131-023 $14.94SFR 409-131-024 $14.94SFR 409-132-001 $14.94SFR 409-132-002 $7.46VSFR 409-132-003 $14.94SFR 409-132-004 $14.94SFR 409-132-007 $74.70IND 409-132-009 $14.94SFR 409-132-012 $29.88MFR2 409-132-014 $14.94SFR 409-132-016 $7.46VMFR 409-132-017 $29.88MFR2 409-132-018 $14.94SFR 409-132-019 $14.94SFR 409-141-001 $14.94SFR 409-141-007 $14.94SFR 409-141-008 $14.94SFR 409-141-009 $74.70MFR5 409-141-010 $29.88MFR2 409-141-011 $29.88MFR2 409-141-012 $7.46VSFR 409-141-013 $74.70INST Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-141-014 $14.94SFR 409-141-017 $14.94SFR 409-141-018 $14.94SFR 409-141-021 $14.94SFR 409-141-022 $14.94SFR 409-141-023 $14.94SFR 409-142-001 $29.88MFR2 409-142-002 $14.94SFR 409-142-003 $29.88MFR2 409-142-004 $14.94SFR 409-142-010 $14.94SFR 409-142-012 $7.46VSFR 409-142-014 $7.46VSFR 409-142-015 $7.46VSFR 409-142-016 $7.46VSFR 409-151-001 $14.94SFR 409-151-002 $29.88MFR2 409-151-003 $14.94SFR 409-151-004 $14.94SFR 409-151-006 $14.94SFR 409-151-010 $14.94SFR 409-151-012 $29.88MFR2 409-151-013 $29.88MFR2 409-151-014 $29.88MFR2 409-151-015 $14.94SFR 409-151-016 $14.94SFR 409-151-017 $44.82MFR 409-151-018 $14.94SFR 409-151-019 $14.94SFR 409-152-001 $74.70COM 409-152-002 $7.46VMFR 409-152-006 $14.94SFR 409-152-018 $14.94SFR 409-152-019 $14.94SFR 409-152-022 $74.70COM 409-152-023 $14.94SFR 409-152-024 $14.94SFR 409-152-025 $14.94SFR 409-152-027 $14.94SFR 409-152-028 $14.94SFR 409-152-030 $14.94SFR 409-152-031 $14.94SFR 409-152-032 $14.94SFR 409-161-003 $7.46VMFR 409-161-004 $14.94SFR 409-161-005 $14.94SFR 409-161-006 $14.94SFR 409-161-009 $14.94SFR 409-161-010 $29.88MFR2 409-161-011 $14.94SFR 409-161-013 $14.94SFR 409-161-015 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-161-016 $14.94SFR 409-161-017 $14.94SFR 409-161-018 $14.94SFR 409-161-019 $14.94SFR 409-161-020 $14.94SFR 409-161-021 $14.94SFR 409-161-022 $7.46VSFR 409-161-023 $14.94SFR 409-162-002 $14.94SFR 409-162-004 $14.94SFR 409-162-005 $14.94SFR 409-162-007 $14.94SFR 409-162-008 $7.46VSFR 409-162-011 $29.88MFR2 409-162-013 $14.94SFR 409-162-014 $14.94SFR 409-162-015 $14.94SFR 409-162-016 $14.94SFR 409-162-017 $14.94SFR 409-162-019 $14.94SFR 409-162-020 $14.94SFR 409-162-021 $14.94SFR 409-162-022 $14.94SFR 409-162-023 $14.94SFR 409-162-024 $7.46VSFR 409-162-025 $7.46VSFR 409-171-002 $14.94SFR 409-171-003 $14.94SFR 409-171-005 $14.94SFR 409-171-006 $14.94SFR 409-171-007 $14.94SFR 409-171-008 $14.94SFR 409-171-009 $14.94SFR 409-171-010 $29.88MFR2 409-171-011 $59.76MFR4 409-171-012 $7.46VSFR 409-171-017 $44.82MFR 409-171-018 $7.46VMFR 409-171-019 $29.88MFR2 409-171-020 $14.94SFR 409-171-023 $7.46VSFR 409-171-024 $7.46VSFR 409-171-025 $14.94SFR 409-172-001 $7.46VMFR 409-172-002 $14.94SFR 409-172-003 $14.94SFR 409-172-004 $14.94SFR 409-172-005 $29.88MFR2 409-172-014 $14.94SFR 409-172-015 $29.88MFR2 409-172-016 $29.88MFR2 409-172-017 $7.46VMFR - 204 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-172-018 $29.88MFR2 409-172-019 $7.46VSFR 409-172-020 $29.88MFR2 409-172-021 $14.94SFR 409-172-024 $29.88MFR2 409-172-025 $14.94SFR 409-172-026 $14.94SFR 409-172-027 $7.46VSFR 409-172-028 $7.46VSFR 409-181-001 $44.82MFR 409-181-002 $14.94SFR 409-181-003 $14.94SFR 409-181-006 $44.82MFR 409-181-007 $14.94SFR 409-181-008 $7.46VSFR 409-181-010 $14.94SFR 409-181-011 $14.94SFR 409-181-012 $14.94SFR 409-181-013 $14.94SFR 409-181-014 $14.94SFR 409-181-015 $29.88MFR2 409-181-016 $14.94SFR 409-181-020 $14.94SFR 409-181-021 $29.88MFR2 409-181-022 $14.94SFR 409-181-025 $14.94SFR 409-182-003 $14.94SFR 409-182-006 $14.94SFR 409-182-007 $29.88MFR2 409-182-008 $74.70MFR5 409-182-009 $74.70MFR5 409-182-011 $44.82MFR 409-182-013 $14.94SFR 409-182-014 $44.82MFR 409-182-015 $14.94SFR 409-182-016 $14.94SFR 409-182-017 $14.94SFR 409-182-018 $14.94SFR 409-182-019 $7.46VSFR 409-182-020 $7.46VMFR 409-182-021 $14.94SFR 409-182-022 $14.94SFR 409-182-023 $7.46VSFR 409-182-024 $7.46VSFR 409-191-005 $14.94SFR 409-191-006 $14.94SFR 409-191-007 $14.94SFR 409-191-008 $74.70INST 409-191-012 $29.88MFR2 409-191-014 $14.94SFR 409-191-015 $29.88MFR2 409-192-001 $7.46VMFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-192-002 $14.94SFR 409-192-008 $14.94SFR 409-192-010 $14.94SFR 409-192-011 $14.94SFR 409-192-013 $14.94SFR 409-192-014 $14.94SFR 409-192-015 $14.94SFR 409-192-016 $14.94SFR 409-192-017 $29.88MFR2 409-192-021 $14.94SFR 409-192-022 $14.94SFR 409-192-023 $74.70INST 409-192-024 $14.94SFR 409-192-025 $14.94SFR 409-192-026 $14.94SFR 409-192-027 $14.94SFR 409-200-004 $14.94SFR 409-200-005 $14.94SFR 409-200-006 $14.94SFR 409-200-007 $14.94SFR 409-200-009 $7.46VSFR 409-200-010 $14.94SFR 409-200-011 $14.94SFR 409-200-012 $14.94SFR 409-200-013 $14.94SFR 409-200-015 $7.46VMFR 409-200-017 $14.94SFR 409-200-019 $14.94SFR 409-200-021 $74.70INST 409-200-022 $14.94SFR 409-200-023 $14.94SFR 409-200-024 $7.46VSFR 409-200-025 $7.46VSFR 409-210-003 $14.94SFR 409-210-004 $14.94SFR 409-210-005 $14.94SFR 409-210-006 $14.94SFR 409-210-007 $14.94SFR 409-210-008 $14.94SFR 409-210-009 $14.94SFR 409-210-010 $14.94SFR 409-210-012 $14.94SFR 409-210-013 $14.94SFR 409-210-014 $14.94SFR 409-210-015 $14.94SFR 409-210-016 $14.94SFR 409-210-017 $14.94SFR 409-210-018 $14.94SFR 409-210-019 $14.94SFR 409-220-001 $7.46VMFR 409-220-003 $14.94SFR 409-220-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-220-005 $14.94SFR 409-220-006 $7.46VSFR 409-220-007 $7.46VSFR 409-220-008 $7.46VSFR 409-220-011 $14.94SFR 409-220-012 $14.94SFR 409-220-013 $14.94SFR 409-220-014 $7.46VMFR 409-220-015 $14.94SFR 409-220-016 $74.70INST 409-220-019 $14.94SFR 409-220-020 $14.94SFR 409-220-021 $14.94SFR 409-220-025 $14.94SFR 409-220-026 $14.94SFR 409-220-031 $14.94SFR 409-220-033 $74.70INST 409-220-036 $29.88MFR2 409-220-037 $14.94SFR 409-220-038 $14.94SFR 409-220-039 $14.94SFR 409-220-040 $7.46VSFR 409-220-041 $14.94SFR 409-230-001 $29.88MFR2 409-230-002 $14.94SFR 409-230-003 $74.70INST 409-230-004 $14.94SFR 409-230-005 $14.94SFR 409-230-006 $14.94SFR 409-230-007 $14.94SFR 409-230-008 $14.94SFR 409-230-009 $14.94SFR 409-230-010 $29.88MFR2 409-230-011 $14.94SFR 409-230-012 $14.94SFR 409-230-015 $7.46VMFR 409-230-016 $14.94SFR 409-230-021 $14.94SFR 409-230-022 $14.94SFR 409-230-023 $14.94SFR 409-230-024 $14.94SFR 409-230-026 $14.94SFR 409-230-027 $14.94SFR 409-230-028 $29.88MFR2 409-230-029 $14.94SFR 409-230-030 $14.94SFR 409-240-001 $14.94SFR 409-240-002 $29.88MFR2 409-240-003 $14.94SFR 409-240-005 $14.94SFR 409-240-006 $14.94SFR 409-240-011 $7.46VMFR - 205 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-240-012 $14.94SFR 409-240-013 $14.94SFR 409-240-014 $14.94SFR 409-240-015 $14.94SFR 409-240-017 $7.46VMFR 409-240-018 $14.94SFR 409-240-019 $7.46VMFR 409-240-020 $14.94SFR 409-240-021 $44.82MFR 409-240-022 $29.88MFR2 409-240-023 $14.94SFR 409-240-024 $14.94SFR 409-240-026 $29.88MFR2 409-240-027 $14.94SFR 409-240-028 $14.94SFR 409-240-029 $7.46VSFR 409-240-030 $7.46VSFR 409-251-001 $14.94SFR 409-251-002 $14.94SFR 409-251-003 $14.94SFR 409-251-004 $14.94SFR 409-251-005 $14.94SFR 409-251-006 $14.94SFR 409-251-008 $29.88MFR2 409-251-009 $29.88MFR2 409-251-010 $14.94SFR 409-251-011 $14.94SFR 409-251-012 $14.94SFR 409-251-013 $14.94SFR 409-251-014 $14.94SFR 409-251-015 $14.94SFR 409-251-018 $14.94SFR 409-251-019 $7.46VSFR 409-251-020 $7.46VSFR 409-251-021 $7.46VSFR 409-252-006 $29.88MFR2 409-252-011 $74.70INST 409-261-005 $14.94SFR 409-261-007 $14.94SFR 409-261-008 $14.94SFR 409-261-009 $7.46VSFR 409-261-010 $14.94SFR 409-261-011 $29.88MFR2 409-261-012 $7.46VMFR 409-261-013 $7.46VSFR 409-261-014 $14.94SFR 409-261-016 $7.46VSFR 409-261-017 $14.94SFR 409-261-018 $14.94SFR 409-261-019 $14.94SFR 409-261-020 $14.94SFR 409-261-021 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-261-022 $14.94SFR 409-261-023 $14.94SFR 409-261-024 $14.94SFR 409-261-025 $14.94SFR 409-262-002 $14.94SFR 409-262-010 $74.70MFR5 409-262-012 $7.46VSFR 409-262-013 $7.46VSFR 409-262-015 $7.46VSFR 409-262-016 $14.94SFR 409-262-017 $7.46VSFR 409-262-018 $14.94SFR 409-271-001 $14.94SFR 409-271-004 $14.94SFR 409-271-005 $7.46VSFR 409-271-006 $14.94SFR 409-271-007 $7.46VSFR 409-271-010 $14.94SFR 409-271-011 $7.46VCOM 409-271-012 $14.94SFR 409-271-013 $14.94SFR 409-271-014 $14.94SFR 409-271-015 $14.94SFR 409-271-016 $14.94SFR 409-271-018 $14.94SFR 409-271-019 $14.94SFR 409-271-020 $14.94SFR 409-271-021 $7.46VMFR 409-271-022 $14.94SFR 409-271-023 $14.94SFR 409-271-024 $14.94SFR 409-271-025 $7.46VSFR 409-272-002 $14.94SFR 409-272-003 $14.94SFR 409-272-004 $14.94SFR 409-272-005 $14.94SFR 409-272-006 $14.94SFR 409-272-007 $7.46VSFR 409-272-010 $7.46VSFR 409-281-003 $14.94SFR 409-281-004 $14.94SFR 409-281-005 $14.94SFR 409-281-006 $29.88MFR2 409-281-007 $14.94SFR 409-281-009 $14.94SFR 409-281-010 $14.94SFR 409-281-011 $7.46VSFR 409-281-012 $14.94SFR 409-281-013 $14.94SFR 409-281-014 $7.46VMFR 409-281-015 $44.82MFR 409-282-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 409-282-004 $29.88MFR2 409-282-006 $7.46VSFR 409-282-007 $14.94SFR 409-282-008 $14.94SFR 409-282-012 $14.94SFR 409-282-013 $14.94SFR 409-282-015 $14.94SFR 409-282-016 $14.94SFR 409-282-017 $14.94SFR 409-282-020 $14.94SFR 409-282-021 $14.94SFR 409-282-022 $7.46VSFR 409-291-006 $14.94SFR 409-291-008 $7.46VSFR 409-291-015 $14.94SFR 409-291-017 $29.88MFR2 409-291-018 $29.88MFR2 409-291-019 $74.70IND 409-292-002 $14.94SFR 409-292-003 $7.46VSFR 409-292-004 $14.94SFR 409-292-005 $14.94SFR 409-292-006 $14.94SFR 409-311-004 $74.70VIND 409-311-005 $74.70VIND 409-311-006 $74.70IND 409-311-008 $74.70VIND 409-311-016 $74.70IND 409-311-017 $74.70IND 409-311-019 $74.70IND 409-311-020 $74.70IND 409-311-021 $74.70IND 409-312-003 $74.70IND 409-313-006 $74.70VIND 409-331-001 $7.46CONDO 409-331-002 $7.46CONDO 409-332-001 $7.46CONDO 409-332-002 $7.46CONDO 416-011-004 $14.94SFR 416-011-005 $14.94SFR 416-011-006 $14.94SFR 416-012-001 $14.94SFR 416-012-002 $14.94SFR 416-012-005 $14.94SFR 416-012-006 $14.94SFR 416-012-007 $14.94SFR 416-012-008 $14.94SFR 416-012-009 $14.94SFR 416-012-010 $14.94SFR 416-012-011 $14.94SFR 416-012-012 $14.94SFR 416-012-013 $14.94SFR - 206 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-012-017 $14.94SFR 416-013-001 $14.94SFR 416-013-002 $14.94SFR 416-013-003 $14.94SFR 416-013-004 $14.94SFR 416-013-005 $14.94SFR 416-013-006 $14.94SFR 416-013-008 $14.94SFR 416-013-009 $14.94SFR 416-013-011 $14.94SFR 416-013-012 $14.94SFR 416-013-013 $14.94SFR 416-013-014 $14.94SFR 416-013-025 $7.46VSFR 416-013-026 $14.94SFR 416-013-027 $14.94SFR 416-013-028 $7.46VSFR 416-021-001 $14.94SFR 416-021-002 $14.94SFR 416-021-003 $14.94SFR 416-021-004 $14.94SFR 416-021-005 $14.94SFR 416-021-006 $14.94SFR 416-021-007 $14.94SFR 416-021-008 $14.94SFR 416-021-009 $14.94SFR 416-021-010 $14.94SFR 416-021-011 $14.94SFR 416-021-012 $14.94SFR 416-021-013 $14.94SFR 416-021-014 $14.94SFR 416-021-015 $14.94SFR 416-021-016 $14.94SFR 416-021-017 $14.94SFR 416-021-018 $14.94SFR 416-021-019 $14.94SFR 416-021-020 $14.94SFR 416-021-021 $14.94SFR 416-021-022 $14.94SFR 416-021-023 $14.94SFR 416-021-024 $14.94SFR 416-022-001 $14.94SFR 416-022-002 $14.94SFR 416-022-003 $14.94SFR 416-022-004 $14.94SFR 416-022-009 $14.94SFR 416-022-010 $14.94SFR 416-022-011 $14.94SFR 416-022-012 $14.94SFR 416-022-013 $14.94SFR 416-022-014 $14.94SFR 416-022-015 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-022-016 $14.94SFR 416-022-017 $14.94SFR 416-022-018 $14.94SFR 416-022-019 $14.94SFR 416-022-020 $14.94SFR 416-022-021 $14.94SFR 416-022-022 $7.46VSFR 416-023-001 $14.94SFR 416-023-002 $14.94SFR 416-023-003 $14.94SFR 416-023-004 $14.94SFR 416-023-005 $14.94SFR 416-023-006 $14.94SFR 416-023-007 $14.94SFR 416-023-008 $14.94SFR 416-023-009 $14.94SFR 416-023-010 $14.94SFR 416-023-011 $14.94SFR 416-023-012 $14.94SFR 416-023-013 $14.94SFR 416-023-014 $14.94SFR 416-023-015 $14.94SFR 416-023-016 $14.94SFR 416-023-017 $14.94SFR 416-023-018 $14.94SFR 416-023-019 $14.94SFR 416-023-020 $14.94SFR 416-023-021 $14.94SFR 416-023-022 $14.94SFR 416-023-023 $14.94SFR 416-023-024 $14.94SFR 416-023-025 $14.94SFR 416-023-026 $14.94SFR 416-023-027 $14.94SFR 416-023-028 $14.94SFR 416-023-029 $14.94SFR 416-023-030 $14.94SFR 416-023-031 $14.94SFR 416-023-032 $14.94SFR 416-023-033 $14.94SFR 416-023-034 $14.94SFR 416-023-035 $14.94SFR 416-023-036 $14.94SFR 416-023-037 $14.94SFR 416-024-001 $14.94SFR 416-024-002 $14.94SFR 416-024-003 $14.94SFR 416-024-004 $14.94SFR 416-024-005 $14.94SFR 416-024-006 $14.94SFR 416-024-007 $14.94SFR 416-024-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-024-009 $14.94SFR 416-024-010 $14.94SFR 416-024-011 $14.94SFR 416-024-012 $14.94SFR 416-024-013 $14.94SFR 416-024-014 $14.94SFR 416-024-015 $14.94SFR 416-024-016 $14.94SFR 416-024-017 $14.94SFR 416-024-018 $14.94SFR 416-031-001 $14.94SFR 416-031-002 $14.94SFR 416-031-003 $14.94SFR 416-031-004 $14.94SFR 416-031-005 $14.94SFR 416-031-006 $14.94SFR 416-031-007 $14.94SFR 416-031-008 $14.94SFR 416-031-009 $14.94SFR 416-031-010 $14.94SFR 416-031-011 $14.94SFR 416-031-012 $14.94SFR 416-031-013 $14.94SFR 416-031-014 $14.94SFR 416-031-015 $14.94SFR 416-031-016 $14.94SFR 416-031-017 $14.94SFR 416-031-018 $14.94SFR 416-031-019 $14.94SFR 416-031-020 $14.94SFR 416-031-021 $14.94SFR 416-031-022 $14.94SFR 416-031-023 $14.94SFR 416-031-024 $14.94SFR 416-031-025 $14.94SFR 416-031-026 $14.94SFR 416-031-027 $14.94SFR 416-031-028 $14.94SFR 416-031-029 $14.94SFR 416-031-030 $14.94SFR 416-031-031 $14.94SFR 416-031-032 $14.94SFR 416-032-001 $14.94SFR 416-032-002 $14.94SFR 416-032-003 $14.94SFR 416-032-004 $14.94SFR 416-032-005 $14.94SFR 416-032-006 $14.94SFR 416-032-007 $14.94SFR 416-032-008 $14.94SFR 416-032-009 $14.94SFR 416-032-010 $14.94SFR - 207 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-032-012 $14.94SFR 416-032-018 $14.94SFR 416-032-019 $14.94SFR 416-032-020 $14.94SFR 416-032-021 $14.94SFR 416-032-022 $14.94SFR 416-032-023 $14.94SFR 416-032-024 $14.94SFR 416-032-025 $14.94SFR 416-032-026 $14.94SFR 416-032-027 $14.94SFR 416-032-028 $14.94SFR 416-032-029 $14.94SFR 416-032-030 $14.94SFR 416-032-031 $14.94SFR 416-032-032 $14.94SFR 416-042-001 $14.94SFR 416-042-020 $14.94SFR 416-042-021 $14.94SFR 416-042-022 $14.94SFR 416-042-023 $14.94SFR 416-042-024 $14.94SFR 416-042-025 $14.94SFR 416-042-026 $14.94SFR 416-042-027 $14.94SFR 416-042-028 $14.94SFR 416-042-029 $14.94SFR 416-042-030 $14.94SFR 416-042-031 $14.94SFR 416-042-032 $14.94SFR 416-042-033 $14.94SFR 416-042-034 $14.94SFR 416-042-035 $14.94SFR 416-042-036 $14.94SFR 416-042-037 $14.94SFR 416-043-001 $14.94SFR 416-043-002 $14.94SFR 416-043-003 $14.94SFR 416-043-004 $14.94SFR 416-043-005 $14.94SFR 416-043-006 $14.94SFR 416-043-007 $14.94SFR 416-043-008 $7.46VSFR 416-043-009 $14.94SFR 416-043-010 $14.94SFR 416-043-011 $14.94SFR 416-043-012 $14.94SFR 416-043-013 $14.94SFR 416-043-014 $14.94SFR 416-043-015 $14.94SFR 416-043-016 $14.94SFR 416-043-017 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-043-018 $14.94SFR 416-043-019 $14.94SFR 416-043-020 $14.94SFR 416-043-021 $14.94SFR 416-043-022 $14.94SFR 416-043-023 $14.94SFR 416-043-024 $14.94SFR 416-043-025 $14.94SFR 416-043-026 $14.94SFR 416-043-027 $14.94SFR 416-043-028 $14.94SFR 416-043-029 $14.94SFR 416-043-030 $14.94SFR 416-043-031 $14.94SFR 416-043-032 $14.94SFR 416-043-033 $14.94SFR 416-043-034 $14.94SFR 416-043-035 $14.94SFR 416-043-036 $14.94SFR 416-051-001 $14.94SFR 416-051-002 $14.94SFR 416-051-003 $14.94SFR 416-051-004 $14.94SFR 416-051-005 $14.94SFR 416-051-006 $14.94SFR 416-051-007 $14.94SFR 416-051-008 $14.94SFR 416-051-009 $14.94SFR 416-051-010 $14.94SFR 416-051-011 $14.94SFR 416-051-012 $14.94SFR 416-051-013 $14.94SFR 416-051-014 $14.94SFR 416-051-015 $14.94SFR 416-051-016 $14.94SFR 416-051-017 $14.94SFR 416-051-018 $14.94SFR 416-051-019 $14.94SFR 416-051-020 $14.94SFR 416-051-021 $14.94SFR 416-051-022 $14.94SFR 416-051-023 $14.94SFR 416-051-024 $14.94SFR 416-051-025 $14.94SFR 416-051-026 $14.94SFR 416-051-027 $14.94SFR 416-051-028 $14.94SFR 416-051-029 $14.94SFR 416-051-030 $14.94SFR 416-051-031 $14.94SFR 416-051-032 $14.94SFR 416-051-033 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-051-034 $14.94SFR 416-051-035 $14.94SFR 416-051-036 $14.94SFR 416-051-037 $14.94SFR 416-051-038 $14.94SFR 416-051-039 $14.94SFR 416-051-040 $14.94SFR 416-051-041 $14.94SFR 416-051-042 $14.94SFR 416-051-043 $14.94SFR 416-051-044 $14.94SFR 416-051-045 $14.94SFR 416-051-046 $14.94SFR 416-052-001 $14.94SFR 416-052-002 $14.94SFR 416-052-003 $14.94SFR 416-052-004 $14.94SFR 416-052-005 $14.94SFR 416-052-006 $14.94SFR 416-052-007 $14.94SFR 416-052-008 $14.94SFR 416-052-009 $14.94SFR 416-052-010 $14.94SFR 416-052-011 $14.94SFR 416-052-012 $14.94SFR 416-052-013 $14.94SFR 416-052-014 $14.94SFR 416-052-015 $14.94SFR 416-052-016 $14.94SFR 416-052-017 $14.94SFR 416-052-018 $14.94SFR 416-052-019 $14.94SFR 416-052-020 $14.94SFR 416-052-021 $14.94SFR 416-052-022 $14.94SFR 416-052-023 $14.94SFR 416-052-024 $14.94SFR 416-052-025 $14.94SFR 416-052-026 $14.94SFR 416-052-027 $14.94SFR 416-052-028 $14.94SFR 416-052-029 $14.94SFR 416-052-030 $14.94SFR 416-052-031 $14.94SFR 416-052-032 $14.94SFR 416-052-033 $14.94SFR 416-052-034 $14.94SFR 416-052-035 $14.94SFR 416-052-036 $14.94SFR 416-052-037 $14.94SFR 416-052-038 $14.94SFR 416-052-039 $14.94SFR - 208 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-052-040 $14.94SFR 416-052-041 $14.94SFR 416-052-042 $14.94SFR 416-052-043 $14.94SFR 416-052-044 $14.94SFR 416-052-045 $14.94SFR 416-052-046 $14.94SFR 416-052-047 $14.94SFR 416-052-048 $14.94SFR 416-052-049 $14.94SFR 416-052-050 $14.94SFR 416-052-051 $14.94SFR 416-052-052 $14.94SFR 416-052-053 $14.94SFR 416-052-054 $14.94SFR 416-052-055 $14.94SFR 416-052-056 $14.94SFR 416-052-057 $14.94SFR 416-052-058 $14.94SFR 416-052-059 $14.94SFR 416-052-060 $14.94SFR 416-052-061 $14.94SFR 416-052-062 $14.94SFR 416-052-063 $14.94SFR 416-052-064 $14.94SFR 416-061-001 $14.94SFR 416-061-002 $14.94SFR 416-061-003 $14.94SFR 416-061-004 $14.94SFR 416-061-005 $14.94SFR 416-061-006 $14.94SFR 416-061-007 $14.94SFR 416-061-008 $14.94SFR 416-061-009 $14.94SFR 416-061-010 $14.94SFR 416-061-011 $14.94SFR 416-061-012 $14.94SFR 416-061-013 $14.94SFR 416-061-014 $14.94SFR 416-061-015 $14.94SFR 416-061-016 $14.94SFR 416-061-017 $14.94SFR 416-061-018 $14.94SFR 416-061-019 $14.94SFR 416-061-020 $14.94SFR 416-061-021 $14.94SFR 416-061-022 $14.94SFR 416-061-023 $14.94SFR 416-061-024 $14.94SFR 416-061-025 $14.94SFR 416-061-026 $14.94SFR 416-061-027 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-061-028 $14.94SFR 416-061-029 $14.94SFR 416-061-030 $14.94SFR 416-061-031 $14.94SFR 416-061-032 $14.94SFR 416-061-033 $14.94SFR 416-061-034 $14.94SFR 416-061-035 $14.94SFR 416-061-036 $14.94SFR 416-061-037 $14.94SFR 416-061-038 $14.94SFR 416-061-039 $14.94SFR 416-061-040 $14.94SFR 416-061-041 $14.94SFR 416-061-042 $14.94SFR 416-061-043 $14.94SFR 416-061-044 $14.94SFR 416-061-045 $14.94SFR 416-061-046 $14.94SFR 416-061-047 $14.94SFR 416-061-048 $14.94SFR 416-061-049 $14.94SFR 416-061-050 $14.94SFR 416-061-051 $14.94SFR 416-061-052 $14.94SFR 416-061-053 $14.94SFR 416-061-054 $14.94SFR 416-061-055 $14.94SFR 416-061-056 $14.94SFR 416-061-057 $14.94SFR 416-061-058 $14.94SFR 416-061-059 $14.94SFR 416-061-060 $14.94SFR 416-061-061 $14.94SFR 416-061-062 $14.94SFR 416-061-063 $14.94SFR 416-062-001 $14.94SFR 416-062-002 $14.94SFR 416-062-003 $14.94SFR 416-062-004 $14.94SFR 416-062-005 $14.94SFR 416-062-006 $14.94SFR 416-062-007 $14.94SFR 416-062-008 $14.94SFR 416-062-009 $14.94SFR 416-062-010 $14.94SFR 416-062-011 $14.94SFR 416-062-012 $14.94SFR 416-062-013 $14.94SFR 416-062-014 $14.94SFR 416-062-015 $14.94SFR 416-062-016 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-062-017 $14.94SFR 416-062-018 $14.94SFR 416-062-019 $14.94SFR 416-062-020 $14.94SFR 416-062-021 $14.94SFR 416-062-022 $14.94SFR 416-062-023 $14.94SFR 416-062-024 $14.94SFR 416-062-025 $14.94SFR 416-062-026 $14.94SFR 416-062-027 $14.94SFR 416-062-028 $14.94SFR 416-062-029 $14.94SFR 416-062-030 $14.94SFR 416-062-031 $14.94SFR 416-062-032 $14.94SFR 416-062-033 $14.94SFR 416-062-034 $14.94SFR 416-062-035 $14.94SFR 416-062-036 $14.94SFR 416-062-037 $14.94SFR 416-062-038 $14.94SFR 416-062-039 $14.94SFR 416-062-040 $14.94SFR 416-062-041 $14.94SFR 416-062-042 $14.94SFR 416-062-043 $14.94SFR 416-062-044 $14.94SFR 416-062-045 $14.94SFR 416-062-046 $14.94SFR 416-063-002 $14.94SFR 416-063-003 $14.94SFR 416-063-004 $14.94SFR 416-063-005 $14.94SFR 416-063-006 $14.94SFR 416-063-007 $14.94SFR 416-063-008 $14.94SFR 416-063-009 $14.94SFR 416-063-010 $14.94SFR 416-063-011 $14.94SFR 416-063-012 $14.94SFR 416-063-013 $14.94SFR 416-063-014 $14.94SFR 416-063-015 $14.94SFR 416-063-016 $14.94SFR 416-063-017 $14.94SFR 416-063-018 $14.94SFR 416-063-019 $14.94SFR 416-063-020 $14.94SFR 416-063-021 $14.94SFR 416-063-022 $14.94SFR 416-063-023 $14.94SFR - 209 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-071-001 $14.94SFR 416-071-002 $14.94SFR 416-071-003 $14.94SFR 416-071-004 $14.94SFR 416-071-005 $14.94SFR 416-071-006 $14.94SFR 416-071-007 $14.94SFR 416-071-008 $14.94SFR 416-071-009 $14.94SFR 416-071-010 $14.94SFR 416-071-011 $14.94SFR 416-071-012 $14.94SFR 416-071-013 $14.94SFR 416-071-014 $14.94SFR 416-071-015 $14.94SFR 416-071-016 $14.94SFR 416-071-017 $14.94SFR 416-071-018 $14.94SFR 416-071-019 $14.94SFR 416-071-020 $14.94SFR 416-071-021 $14.94SFR 416-071-022 $14.94SFR 416-071-023 $14.94SFR 416-071-024 $14.94SFR 416-071-025 $14.94SFR 416-071-026 $14.94SFR 416-071-027 $14.94SFR 416-071-028 $14.94SFR 416-071-029 $14.94SFR 416-071-030 $14.94SFR 416-071-031 $14.94SFR 416-071-032 $14.94SFR 416-071-033 $14.94SFR 416-071-034 $14.94SFR 416-071-035 $14.94SFR 416-071-036 $14.94SFR 416-071-037 $14.94SFR 416-071-038 $14.94SFR 416-071-039 $14.94SFR 416-071-040 $14.94SFR 416-071-041 $14.94SFR 416-072-001 $14.94SFR 416-072-002 $14.94SFR 416-072-003 $14.94SFR 416-072-004 $14.94SFR 416-072-005 $14.94SFR 416-072-006 $14.94SFR 416-072-007 $14.94SFR 416-072-008 $14.94SFR 416-072-009 $14.94SFR 416-072-010 $14.94SFR 416-072-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-072-012 $14.94SFR 416-072-013 $14.94SFR 416-072-014 $14.94SFR 416-072-015 $14.94SFR 416-072-016 $14.94SFR 416-072-017 $14.94SFR 416-072-018 $14.94SFR 416-072-019 $14.94SFR 416-072-020 $14.94SFR 416-072-021 $14.94SFR 416-072-022 $14.94SFR 416-072-023 $14.94SFR 416-072-024 $14.94SFR 416-072-025 $14.94SFR 416-072-026 $14.94SFR 416-072-027 $14.94SFR 416-072-028 $14.94SFR 416-072-029 $14.94SFR 416-072-030 $14.94SFR 416-072-031 $14.94SFR 416-073-003 $104.58MFR7 416-074-006 $74.70INST 416-074-020 $14.94SFR 416-074-021 $14.94SFR 416-074-022 $14.94SFR 416-074-023 $14.94SFR 416-074-024 $14.94SFR 416-074-025 $14.94SFR 416-074-026 $14.94SFR 416-074-027 $14.94SFR 416-074-028 $14.94SFR 416-074-029 $14.94SFR 416-074-030 $14.94SFR 416-074-031 $14.94SFR 416-074-032 $14.94SFR 416-074-033 $14.94SFR 416-074-034 $14.94SFR 416-074-035 $14.94SFR 416-074-036 $14.94SFR 416-074-037 $14.94SFR 416-074-038 $14.94SFR 416-074-042 $14.94SFR 416-074-043 $14.94SFR 416-074-044 $14.94SFR 416-074-045 $14.94SFR 416-074-046 $14.94SFR 416-074-047 $14.94SFR 416-074-048 $14.94SFR 416-074-049 $14.94SFR 416-074-050 $14.94SFR 416-074-051 $14.94SFR 416-074-052 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-074-053 $14.94SFR 416-074-054 $14.94SFR 416-081-001 $14.94SFR 416-081-002 $14.94SFR 416-081-003 $14.94SFR 416-081-004 $14.94SFR 416-081-005 $14.94SFR 416-081-006 $14.94SFR 416-081-007 $14.94SFR 416-081-008 $14.94SFR 416-081-009 $14.94SFR 416-081-010 $14.94SFR 416-081-011 $14.94SFR 416-081-012 $14.94SFR 416-081-013 $14.94SFR 416-081-014 $14.94SFR 416-081-015 $14.94SFR 416-081-016 $14.94SFR 416-081-017 $14.94SFR 416-081-018 $14.94SFR 416-081-019 $14.94SFR 416-081-020 $14.94SFR 416-081-021 $14.94SFR 416-081-022 $14.94SFR 416-081-023 $14.94SFR 416-081-024 $14.94SFR 416-081-025 $14.94SFR 416-081-026 $14.94SFR 416-081-027 $14.94SFR 416-081-028 $14.94SFR 416-081-029 $14.94SFR 416-081-030 $14.94SFR 416-081-031 $14.94SFR 416-081-032 $14.94SFR 416-081-033 $14.94SFR 416-081-034 $14.94SFR 416-081-035 $14.94SFR 416-081-036 $14.94SFR 416-081-037 $14.94SFR 416-081-038 $14.94SFR 416-081-039 $14.94SFR 416-081-040 $14.94SFR 416-081-041 $14.94SFR 416-081-042 $14.94SFR 416-081-043 $14.94SFR 416-081-044 $14.94SFR 416-081-045 $14.94SFR 416-081-046 $14.94SFR 416-081-047 $14.94SFR 416-081-048 $14.94SFR 416-081-049 $14.94SFR 416-081-050 $14.94SFR - 210 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-081-051 $14.94SFR 416-081-052 $14.94SFR 416-082-001 $14.94SFR 416-082-002 $14.94SFR 416-082-003 $14.94SFR 416-082-004 $14.94SFR 416-082-005 $14.94SFR 416-082-006 $14.94SFR 416-082-007 $14.94SFR 416-082-008 $14.94SFR 416-082-009 $14.94SFR 416-082-010 $14.94SFR 416-082-011 $14.94SFR 416-082-012 $14.94SFR 416-082-013 $14.94SFR 416-082-014 $14.94SFR 416-082-015 $14.94SFR 416-082-016 $14.94SFR 416-082-017 $14.94SFR 416-091-001 $14.94SFR 416-091-002 $14.94SFR 416-091-003 $14.94SFR 416-091-004 $14.94SFR 416-091-005 $14.94SFR 416-091-006 $14.94SFR 416-091-007 $14.94SFR 416-091-008 $14.94SFR 416-091-009 $14.94SFR 416-091-010 $14.94SFR 416-091-011 $14.94SFR 416-091-012 $14.94SFR 416-091-013 $14.94SFR 416-091-014 $14.94SFR 416-091-015 $14.94SFR 416-091-016 $14.94SFR 416-091-017 $14.94SFR 416-091-018 $14.94SFR 416-091-019 $14.94SFR 416-091-020 $14.94SFR 416-091-021 $14.94SFR 416-091-022 $14.94SFR 416-091-023 $14.94SFR 416-091-024 $14.94SFR 416-091-025 $14.94SFR 416-091-026 $14.94SFR 416-091-027 $14.94SFR 416-091-028 $14.94SFR 416-091-029 $14.94SFR 416-091-030 $14.94SFR 416-091-031 $14.94SFR 416-091-032 $14.94SFR 416-091-033 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 416-091-034 $14.94SFR 416-091-035 $14.94SFR 416-092-001 $14.94SFR 416-092-002 $14.94SFR 416-092-003 $14.94SFR 416-092-004 $14.94SFR 416-092-005 $14.94SFR 416-092-006 $14.94SFR 416-092-007 $14.94SFR 416-092-008 $14.94SFR 416-092-009 $14.94SFR 416-092-010 $14.94SFR 416-092-011 $14.94SFR 416-092-012 $14.94SFR 416-092-013 $14.94SFR 416-092-014 $14.94SFR 416-092-015 $14.94SFR 416-092-016 $14.94SFR 416-092-017 $14.94SFR 416-092-018 $14.94SFR 416-092-019 $14.94SFR 416-092-020 $14.94SFR 416-092-021 $14.94SFR 416-092-022 $14.94SFR 416-092-023 $14.94SFR 416-092-024 $14.94SFR 416-092-025 $14.94SFR 416-092-026 $14.94SFR 416-092-027 $14.94SFR 416-092-028 $14.94SFR 416-092-029 $14.94SFR 416-092-030 $14.94SFR 416-092-031 $14.94SFR 416-092-032 $14.94SFR 416-092-033 $14.94SFR 416-092-034 $14.94SFR 416-092-035 $14.94SFR 416-092-036 $14.94SFR 416-092-037 $14.94SFR 416-092-038 $14.94SFR 416-092-039 $14.94SFR 416-092-040 $14.94SFR 416-092-041 $14.94SFR 416-092-042 $14.94SFR 418-021-002 $14.94SFR 418-021-003 $14.94SFR 418-021-007 $7.46VSFR 418-061-001 $14.94SFR 418-061-002 $14.94SFR 418-061-003 $14.94SFR 418-061-004 $14.94SFR 418-061-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 418-061-006 $14.94SFR 418-061-007 $14.94SFR 418-061-008 $14.94SFR 418-061-009 $14.94SFR 418-061-010 $14.94SFR 418-061-011 $14.94SFR 418-061-012 $14.94SFR 418-061-013 $14.94SFR 418-061-014 $14.94SFR 418-061-015 $14.94SFR 418-061-016 $29.88MFR2 418-061-017 $14.94SFR 418-061-018 $14.94SFR 418-061-019 $14.94SFR 418-061-020 $14.94SFR 418-061-021 $14.94SFR 418-061-022 $14.94SFR 418-062-001 $14.94SFR 418-062-002 $14.94SFR 418-062-003 $14.94SFR 418-062-004 $29.88MFR2 418-062-005 $14.94SFR 418-062-006 $14.94SFR 418-062-007 $14.94SFR 418-062-008 $44.82MFR 418-062-009 $14.94SFR 418-062-010 $14.94SFR 418-062-011 $14.94SFR 418-062-012 $14.94SFR 418-062-013 $14.94SFR 418-062-014 $14.94SFR 418-062-015 $14.94SFR 418-062-016 $14.94SFR 418-063-001 $14.94SFR 418-063-002 $14.94SFR 418-063-003 $14.94SFR 418-063-004 $14.94SFR 418-063-005 $14.94SFR 418-063-006 $14.94SFR 418-063-007 $14.94SFR 418-063-008 $14.94SFR 418-063-009 $14.94SFR 418-063-010 $14.94SFR 418-063-011 $14.94SFR 418-071-001 $14.94SFR 418-071-002 $14.94SFR 418-071-003 $14.94SFR 418-071-004 $14.94SFR 418-071-005 $14.94SFR 418-071-006 $14.94SFR 418-071-007 $14.94SFR 418-071-008 $14.94SFR - 211 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 418-071-009 $14.94SFR 418-071-010 $14.94SFR 418-071-012 $14.94SFR 418-071-013 $14.94SFR 418-071-014 $14.94SFR 418-071-015 $14.94SFR 418-071-016 $14.94SFR 418-071-017 $14.94SFR 418-071-018 $14.94SFR 418-071-019 $14.94SFR 418-071-020 $14.94SFR 418-071-021 $14.94SFR 418-071-022 $14.94SFR 418-071-024 $14.94SFR 418-071-026 $29.88MFR2 418-071-027 $14.94SFR 418-071-028 $14.94SFR 418-071-029 $14.94SFR 418-071-030 $29.88MFR2 418-071-031 $14.94SFR 418-071-032 $14.94SFR 418-071-033 $14.94SFR 418-071-034 $14.94SFR 418-071-035 $29.88MFR2 418-071-036 $14.94SFR 418-072-002 $14.94SFR 418-072-003 $14.94SFR 418-072-004 $14.94SFR 418-072-005 $14.94SFR 418-072-006 $14.94SFR 418-072-008 $14.94SFR 418-072-009 $14.94SFR 418-072-010 $14.94SFR 418-072-011 $14.94SFR 418-072-012 $14.94SFR 418-072-013 $14.94SFR 418-072-031 $14.94SFR 418-080-001 $14.94SFR 418-080-003 $14.94SFR 418-080-004 $14.94SFR 418-080-005 $14.94SFR 418-080-006 $14.94SFR 418-080-007 $14.94SFR 418-080-008 $14.94SFR 418-080-009 $14.94SFR 418-080-010 $14.94SFR 418-080-011 $14.94SFR 418-080-012 $14.94SFR 418-080-013 $14.94SFR 418-080-014 $14.94SFR 418-080-016 $14.94SFR 418-080-017 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 418-080-018 $14.94SFR 418-080-019 $14.94SFR 418-080-020 $14.94SFR 418-080-021 $14.94SFR 418-080-022 $14.94SFR 418-080-023 $14.94SFR 418-080-024 $14.94SFR 418-080-025 $14.94SFR 418-080-026 $14.94SFR 418-090-001 $14.94SFR 418-090-006 $14.94SFR 418-090-007 $14.94SFR 418-090-008 $14.94SFR 418-090-009 $7.46VSFR 418-090-010 $14.94SFR 418-090-011 $7.46VSFR 418-090-012 $14.94SFR 418-090-013 $14.94SFR 418-090-019 $14.94SFR 418-090-020 $14.94SFR 418-090-021 $14.94SFR 418-090-024 $14.94SFR 418-090-025 $14.94SFR 418-090-026 $14.94SFR 418-090-027 $14.94SFR 418-090-028 $14.94SFR 418-090-029 $7.46VSFR 418-090-030 $14.94SFR 418-090-031 $14.94SFR 418-090-033 $14.94SFR 418-090-034 $14.94SFR 418-090-036 $14.94SFR 418-090-037 $14.94SFR 418-090-041 $14.94SFR 418-090-042 $14.94SFR 418-100-001 $14.94SFR 418-100-002 $14.94SFR 418-100-004 $14.94SFR 418-100-005 $14.94SFR 418-100-006 $14.94SFR 418-100-007 $14.94SFR 418-100-008 $14.94SFR 418-100-009 $14.94SFR 418-100-010 $14.94SFR 418-100-011 $14.94SFR 418-100-012 $14.94SFR 418-100-013 $14.94SFR 418-100-014 $14.94SFR 418-100-017 $14.94SFR 418-100-018 $14.94SFR 418-100-020 $14.94SFR 418-100-021 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 418-100-022 $7.46VSFR 418-100-023 $7.46VSFR 418-100-024 $14.94SFR 418-100-025 $14.94SFR 418-100-026 $14.94SFR 418-100-027 $14.94SFR 418-100-028 $14.94SFR 418-100-029 $14.94SFR 418-100-030 $14.94SFR 418-100-031 $14.94SFR 418-100-032 $14.94SFR 418-100-033 $14.94SFR 418-100-034 $14.94SFR 418-100-035 $14.94SFR 418-100-036 $14.94SFR 418-100-037 $14.94SFR 418-100-039 $14.94SFR 418-100-040 $14.94SFR 418-100-041 $14.94SFR 418-100-042 $14.94SFR 418-100-045 $14.94SFR 418-100-048 $14.94SFR 418-100-049 $14.94SFR 418-100-050 $14.94SFR 418-100-051 $14.94SFR 418-111-001 $14.94SFR 418-111-002 $14.94SFR 418-111-003 $14.94SFR 418-111-004 $14.94SFR 418-111-005 $14.94SFR 418-111-006 $14.94SFR 418-111-007 $14.94SFR 418-111-008 $14.94SFR 418-111-009 $14.94SFR 418-111-010 $14.94SFR 418-111-013 $14.94SFR 418-111-014 $14.94SFR 418-111-015 $29.88MFR2 418-111-016 $29.88MFR2 418-111-017 $29.88MFR2 418-111-018 $14.94SFR 418-111-019 $14.94SFR 418-111-020 $14.94SFR 418-111-021 $14.94SFR 418-111-022 $14.94SFR 418-111-023 $14.94SFR 418-111-024 $14.94SFR 418-111-025 $14.94SFR 418-111-026 $14.94SFR 418-111-027 $14.94SFR 418-111-028 $14.94SFR 418-111-029 $14.94SFR - 212 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 418-111-030 $14.94SFR 418-111-031 $14.94SFR 418-111-032 $14.94SFR 418-111-033 $14.94SFR 418-111-034 $14.94SFR 418-111-035 $14.94SFR 418-111-036 $14.94SFR 418-111-037 $29.88MFR2 418-111-038 $14.94SFR 418-111-043 $14.94SFR 418-111-044 $14.94SFR 418-111-045 $14.94SFR 418-111-046 $14.94SFR 418-111-047 $14.94SFR 418-111-048 $14.94SFR 418-111-049 $74.70COM 418-111-050 $14.94SFR 418-111-051 $14.94SFR 418-112-001 $14.94SFR 418-112-002 $29.88MFR2 418-112-003 $14.94SFR 418-112-005 $29.88MFR2 418-112-006 $29.88MFR2 418-112-008 $14.94SFR 418-112-009 $14.94SFR 418-112-010 $14.94SFR 418-112-011 $14.94SFR 418-112-012 $14.94SFR 418-112-013 $14.94SFR 418-112-014 $14.94SFR 418-112-015 $14.94SFR 418-112-016 $14.94SFR 418-112-020 $14.94SFR 418-112-021 $14.94SFR 418-112-022 $14.94SFR 418-112-023 $14.94SFR 418-112-026 $14.94SFR 418-112-027 $14.94SFR 418-112-028 $14.94SFR 418-112-029 $14.94SFR 418-112-030 $14.94SFR 418-112-031 $14.94SFR 418-112-032 $14.94SFR 418-112-033 $14.94SFR 418-112-034 $14.94SFR 418-112-035 $7.46VSFR 418-112-036 $14.94SFR 418-112-038 $14.94SFR 418-112-039 $14.94SFR 418-112-041 $14.94SFR 418-112-043 $14.94SFR 418-112-044 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 418-112-045 $14.94SFR 418-112-046 $14.94SFR 418-112-047 $14.94SFR 418-112-048 $14.94SFR 418-112-049 $14.94SFR 418-112-050 $14.94SFR 418-112-053 $14.94SFR 418-112-054 $7.46VSFR 418-112-058 $14.94SFR 418-112-059 $29.88MFR2 418-112-060 $14.94SFR 418-112-061 $14.94SFR 418-112-062 $14.94SFR 418-112-063 $14.94SFR 418-112-064 $14.94SFR 418-112-065 $14.94SFR 418-112-066 $14.94SFR 418-112-067 $29.88MFR2 418-112-070 $14.94SFR 418-112-071 $14.94SFR 418-112-072 $14.94SFR 418-112-073 $14.94SFR 418-112-074 $7.46VSFR 418-121-001 $44.82MFR 418-121-002 $14.94SFR 418-121-003 $14.94SFR 418-121-006 $7.46VSFR 418-121-007 $14.94SFR 418-121-008 $14.94SFR 418-121-009 $14.94SFR 418-121-010 $14.94SFR 418-121-011 $14.94SFR 418-121-012 $14.94SFR 418-121-013 $14.94SFR 418-121-017 $14.94SFR 418-121-018 $14.94SFR 418-121-020 $14.94SFR 418-121-021 $14.94SFR 418-121-022 $14.94SFR 418-121-023 $14.94SFR 418-121-024 $7.46VSFR 418-121-025 $7.46VSFR 418-121-027 $14.94SFR 418-121-029 $14.94SFR 418-121-030 $14.94SFR 418-121-031 $14.94SFR 418-121-032 $14.94SFR 418-121-033 $14.94SFR 418-121-034 $14.94SFR 418-121-035 $14.94SFR 418-121-037 $7.46VSFR 418-121-038 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 418-121-042 $7.46VSFR 418-121-043 $7.46VSFR 418-121-044 $14.94SFR 418-121-045 $14.94SFR 418-121-046 $14.94SFR 418-121-047 $14.94SFR 418-121-048 $14.94SFR 418-122-001 $14.94SFR 418-122-002 $14.94SFR 418-122-003 $14.94SFR 418-122-004 $14.94SFR 418-122-005 $14.94SFR 418-122-006 $14.94SFR 418-122-008 $14.94SFR 418-122-013 $14.94SFR 418-122-014 $29.88MFR2 418-122-016 $14.94SFR 418-122-018 $14.94SFR 418-122-019 $14.94SFR 418-122-021 $14.94SFR 418-122-022 $14.94SFR 418-122-023 $14.94SFR 418-122-024 $14.94SFR 418-122-025 $14.94SFR 418-122-026 $14.94SFR 418-122-027 $14.94SFR 418-122-028 $14.94SFR 418-122-029 $14.94SFR 418-122-030 $14.94SFR 418-122-031 $14.94SFR 418-122-032 $14.94SFR 418-122-033 $14.94SFR 418-122-034 $14.94SFR 418-122-035 $14.94SFR 418-122-036 $14.94SFR 418-122-040 $14.94SFR 418-122-041 $14.94SFR 418-122-042 $14.94SFR 418-122-043 $14.94SFR 418-122-044 $29.88MFR2 418-122-045 $14.94SFR 418-122-046 $14.94SFR 418-122-048 $14.94SFR 418-122-049 $7.46VSFR 418-122-050 $14.94SFR 418-122-051 $14.94SFR 418-122-052 $14.94SFR 418-122-053 $14.94SFR 418-122-054 $14.94SFR 418-122-055 $14.94SFR 418-131-001 $14.94SFR 418-131-002 $7.46VSFR - 213 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 418-131-003 $7.46VSFR 418-131-004 $7.46VSFR 418-131-006 $7.46VSFR 418-132-004 $14.94SFR 418-132-005 $14.94SFR 418-132-006 $7.46VSFR 418-132-007 $14.94SFR 418-132-008 $14.94SFR 418-132-009 $7.46VSFR 418-132-010 $7.46VSFR 418-132-011 $14.94SFR 418-132-012 $14.94SFR 418-132-013 $14.94SFR 418-132-014 $14.94SFR 418-132-015 $14.94SFR 418-132-016 $14.94SFR 418-132-017 $14.94SFR 418-132-019 $7.46VSFR 418-132-021 $14.94SFR 418-132-023 $14.94SFR 418-132-024 $14.94SFR 418-132-025 $14.94SFR 418-132-026 $7.46VSFR 418-132-029 $14.94SFR 418-132-030 $14.94SFR 418-132-031 $14.94SFR 418-132-032 $14.94SFR 418-132-036 $14.94SFR 418-132-037 $7.46VSFR 418-132-039 $14.94SFR 418-132-040 $7.46VSFR 418-132-042 $14.94SFR 418-132-043 $14.94SFR 418-133-001 $14.94SFR 418-133-002 $14.94SFR 418-133-003 $14.94SFR 418-133-004 $14.94SFR 418-133-005 $14.94SFR 418-133-006 $14.94SFR 418-133-007 $14.94SFR 418-133-008 $14.94SFR 418-133-009 $14.94SFR 418-133-012 $14.94SFR 418-133-013 $14.94SFR 418-133-014 $14.94SFR 418-133-015 $14.94SFR 418-133-016 $29.88MFR2 418-133-018 $29.88MFR2 418-133-019 $14.94SFR 418-133-020 $14.94SFR 418-133-021 $14.94SFR 418-141-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 418-141-003 $7.46VSFR 418-141-005 $14.94SFR 418-141-006 $14.94SFR 418-141-007 $7.46VSFR 418-141-008 $14.94SFR 418-141-009 $14.94SFR 418-141-010 $14.94SFR 418-141-013 $7.46VSFR 418-141-014 $7.46VSFR 418-141-015 $14.94SFR 418-141-021 $14.94SFR 418-141-023 $7.46VSFR 418-141-024 $7.46VSFR 418-141-025 $14.94SFR 418-141-026 $14.94SFR 418-142-001 $14.94SFR 418-142-003 $14.94SFR 418-142-006 $14.94SFR 418-142-007 $14.94SFR 418-142-008 $14.94SFR 418-142-009 $7.46VSFR 418-142-013 $7.46VSFR 418-142-014 $7.46VSFR 418-142-015 $7.46VSFR 418-142-016 $7.46VSFR 418-142-017 $14.94SFR 418-142-018 $14.94SFR 418-142-021 $14.94SFR 418-142-022 $7.46VSFR 418-142-023 $14.94SFR 418-142-024 $14.94SFR 418-142-025 $14.94SFR 418-142-026 $7.46VSFR 418-142-027 $14.94SFR 418-142-031 $7.46VSFR 418-142-032 $14.94SFR 418-142-033 $14.94SFR 418-142-035 $14.94SFR 418-142-036 $7.46VSFR 418-143-001 $7.46VSFR 418-143-002 $7.46VSFR 418-143-003 $7.46VSFR 418-143-004 $7.46VSFR 418-143-005 $7.46VSFR 418-143-006 $7.46VSFR 418-143-007 $14.94SFR 418-143-015 $14.94SFR 418-143-016 $14.94SFR 418-143-017 $14.94SFR 418-143-018 $14.94SFR 418-143-019 $7.46VSFR 418-143-022 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 418-143-023 $14.94SFR 418-143-024 $14.94SFR 418-143-025 $14.94SFR 418-143-026 $14.94SFR 418-143-029 $14.94SFR 418-143-030 $7.46VSFR 418-143-031 $14.94SFR 418-143-032 $14.94SFR 418-143-033 $14.94SFR 418-143-035 $14.94SFR 418-143-036 $14.94SFR 418-143-037 $14.94SFR 418-143-038 $14.94SFR 418-143-040 $7.46VSFR 418-143-041 $14.94SFR 418-143-042 $14.94SFR 418-143-043 $14.94SFR 418-143-044 $14.94SFR 418-143-045 $14.94SFR 418-150-004 $14.94SFR 418-150-006 $29.88MFR2 418-150-007 $14.94SFR 418-150-008 $14.94SFR 418-150-010 $14.94SFR 418-150-011 $14.94SFR 418-160-001 $14.94SFR 418-160-003 $7.46VSFR 418-160-004 $14.94SFR 418-160-005 $7.46VSFR 418-160-006 $14.94SFR 418-170-002 $14.94SFR 418-170-004 $7.46VSFR 418-170-005 $14.94SFR 418-170-006 $7.46VSFR 418-170-013 $14.94SFR 418-170-017 $14.94SFR 418-170-018 $14.94SFR 418-170-020 $14.94SFR 418-170-022 $14.94SFR 418-170-027 $14.94SFR 418-170-028 $14.94SFR 418-170-030 $7.46VSFR 418-170-032 $14.94SFR 418-170-033 $29.88MFR2 418-190-001 $14.94SFR 418-190-005 $14.94SFR 418-190-010 $14.94SFR 418-190-011 $14.94SFR 418-190-012 $14.94SFR 418-190-014 $14.94SFR 418-190-015 $14.94SFR 418-190-017 $14.94SFR - 214 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 418-190-018 $14.94SFR 418-190-019 $14.94SFR 418-190-024 $14.94SFR 418-190-025 $14.94SFR 418-190-027 $14.94SFR 418-190-030 $14.94SFR 418-190-031 $7.46VSFR 418-190-033 $14.94SFR 418-190-036 $7.46VSFR 418-190-037 $14.94SFR 418-190-038 $14.94SFR 418-190-040 $14.94SFR 418-190-041 $14.94SFR 418-200-005 $14.94SFR 418-200-007 $14.94SFR 418-200-008 $14.94SFR 418-200-011 $14.94SFR 418-200-012 $14.94SFR 418-200-019 $14.94SFR 418-200-020 $7.46VSFR 418-200-021 $14.94SFR 418-200-023 $14.94SFR 418-200-024 $14.94SFR 418-200-026 $14.94SFR 418-200-027 $14.94SFR 418-200-029 $14.94SFR 418-200-030 $74.70INST 418-200-035 $74.70INST 418-200-036 $14.94SFR 418-200-037 $7.46VSFR 419-051-001 $14.94SFR 419-051-002 $14.94SFR 419-051-003 $7.46VSFR 419-051-007 $14.94SFR 419-051-010 $14.94SFR 419-051-011 $14.94SFR 419-051-012 $14.94SFR 419-051-013 $14.94SFR 419-051-015 $14.94SFR 419-051-016 $7.46VSFR 419-051-017 $14.94SFR 419-051-019 $14.94SFR 419-051-020 $14.94SFR 419-051-021 $14.94SFR 419-051-022 $7.46VSFR 419-051-023 $7.46VSFR 419-051-024 $7.46VSFR 419-052-001 $14.94SFR 419-052-002 $14.94SFR 419-052-003 $14.94SFR 419-052-004 $14.94SFR 419-052-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 419-052-006 $14.94SFR 419-052-007 $14.94SFR 419-052-008 $14.94SFR 419-052-009 $14.94SFR 419-052-010 $14.94SFR 419-052-011 $14.94SFR 419-052-012 $14.94SFR 419-052-013 $14.94SFR 419-052-014 $14.94SFR 419-052-015 $14.94SFR 419-052-016 $14.94SFR 419-052-017 $14.94SFR 419-052-018 $14.94SFR 419-052-019 $14.94SFR 419-052-020 $14.94SFR 419-061-002 $14.94SFR 419-061-003 $14.94SFR 419-061-004 $14.94SFR 419-061-005 $14.94SFR 419-061-006 $14.94SFR 419-061-007 $14.94SFR 419-061-008 $14.94SFR 419-061-009 $14.94SFR 419-061-010 $7.46VSFR 419-061-011 $14.94SFR 419-061-012 $14.94SFR 419-061-019 $14.94SFR 419-061-021 $14.94SFR 419-061-022 $14.94SFR 419-061-023 $7.46VSFR 419-061-024 $7.46VSFR 419-062-002 $14.94SFR 419-062-003 $14.94SFR 419-062-004 $14.94SFR 419-062-005 $14.94SFR 419-062-008 $14.94SFR 419-062-009 $14.94SFR 419-062-010 $14.94SFR 419-062-011 $14.94SFR 419-062-013 $14.94SFR 419-062-014 $14.94SFR 419-062-015 $14.94SFR 419-062-016 $14.94SFR 419-062-017 $14.94SFR 419-062-018 $29.88MFR2 419-071-001 $14.94SFR 419-071-002 $14.94SFR 419-071-003 $14.94SFR 419-071-004 $14.94SFR 419-071-005 $14.94SFR 419-071-006 $14.94SFR 419-071-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 419-071-008 $14.94SFR 419-071-009 $14.94SFR 419-071-011 $14.94SFR 419-071-012 $14.94SFR 419-072-003 $14.94SFR 419-072-004 $14.94SFR 419-072-005 $14.94SFR 419-072-008 $14.94SFR 419-072-009 $14.94SFR 419-072-010 $14.94SFR 419-072-011 $14.94SFR 419-072-013 $14.94SFR 419-072-014 $14.94SFR 419-072-016 $14.94SFR 419-072-017 $14.94SFR 419-072-018 $14.94SFR 419-072-019 $14.94SFR 419-072-020 $14.94SFR 419-081-007 $14.94SFR 419-081-008 $14.94SFR 419-081-011 $14.94SFR 419-081-012 $14.94SFR 419-081-013 $14.94SFR 419-081-014 $29.88MFR2 419-082-004 $14.94SFR 419-082-006 $14.94SFR 419-082-007 $14.94SFR 419-082-009 $14.94SFR 419-082-010 $14.94SFR 419-082-012 $14.94SFR 419-082-013 $14.94SFR 419-082-014 $14.94SFR 419-082-015 $7.46VSFR 419-082-016 $14.94SFR 419-082-017 $14.94SFR 419-091-001 $14.94SFR 419-091-003 $14.94SFR 419-091-004 $14.94SFR 419-091-005 $14.94SFR 419-091-008 $14.94SFR 419-091-009 $14.94SFR 419-091-010 $14.94SFR 419-091-011 $14.94SFR 419-091-014 $14.94SFR 419-091-015 $14.94SFR 419-091-016 $14.94SFR 419-091-017 $14.94SFR 419-091-018 $14.94SFR 419-091-019 $7.46VSFR 419-091-020 $14.94SFR 419-091-021 $14.94SFR 419-092-001 $14.94SFR - 215 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 419-092-002 $14.94SFR 419-092-007 $14.94SFR 419-092-008 $14.94SFR 419-092-009 $14.94SFR 419-092-010 $14.94SFR 419-092-011 $14.94SFR 419-092-013 $14.94SFR 419-092-014 $14.94SFR 419-092-015 $14.94SFR 419-092-016 $14.94SFR 419-092-017 $14.94SFR 419-101-003 $14.94SFR 419-101-017 $14.94SFR 419-101-022 $14.94SFR 419-101-023 $14.94SFR 419-101-024 $14.94SFR 419-101-025 $29.88MFR2 419-101-026 $14.94SFR 419-101-027 $14.94SFR 419-101-028 $14.94SFR 419-101-029 $7.46VSFR 419-101-030 $14.94SFR 419-102-001 $14.94SFR 419-102-002 $14.94SFR 419-102-003 $14.94SFR 419-102-004 $14.94SFR 419-102-005 $14.94SFR 419-102-006 $14.94SFR 419-102-007 $7.46VSFR 419-102-008 $14.94SFR 419-102-009 $14.94SFR 419-102-010 $14.94SFR 419-102-011 $14.94SFR 419-111-001 $14.94SFR 419-111-002 $14.94SFR 419-111-003 $14.94SFR 419-111-004 $14.94SFR 419-111-005 $14.94SFR 419-111-006 $14.94SFR 419-111-007 $14.94SFR 419-111-008 $14.94SFR 419-111-009 $14.94SFR 419-111-010 $14.94SFR 419-111-011 $14.94SFR 419-111-012 $14.94SFR 419-111-013 $14.94SFR 419-111-014 $14.94SFR 419-111-019 $14.94SFR 419-111-024 $29.88MFR2 419-112-001 $7.46VSFR 419-112-002 $14.94SFR 419-112-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 419-112-004 $14.94SFR 419-112-005 $14.94SFR 419-112-006 $14.94SFR 419-112-007 $14.94SFR 419-112-008 $14.94SFR 419-112-009 $14.94SFR 419-112-010 $14.94SFR 419-112-011 $14.94SFR 419-112-012 $14.94SFR 419-112-013 $14.94SFR 419-112-014 $14.94SFR 419-112-015 $14.94SFR 419-112-016 $14.94SFR 419-112-017 $14.94SFR 419-112-018 $14.94SFR 419-112-019 $14.94SFR 419-112-020 $7.46VSFR 419-112-021 $14.94SFR 419-112-022 $14.94SFR 419-112-023 $14.94SFR 419-112-024 $14.94SFR 419-112-025 $14.94SFR 419-112-026 $14.94SFR 419-112-027 $14.94SFR 419-112-028 $14.94SFR 419-112-029 $7.46VSFR 419-112-030 $14.94SFR 419-112-031 $14.94SFR 419-112-032 $14.94SFR 419-113-001 $14.94SFR 419-113-002 $14.94SFR 419-113-003 $14.94SFR 419-113-004 $14.94SFR 419-113-005 $14.94SFR 419-113-006 $29.88MFR2 419-113-007 $14.94SFR 419-113-008 $14.94SFR 419-113-009 $14.94SFR 419-113-010 $14.94SFR 419-121-002 $7.46VSFR 419-121-003 $14.94SFR 419-121-004 $14.94SFR 419-121-005 $14.94SFR 419-121-006 $14.94SFR 419-121-007 $14.94SFR 419-121-008 $14.94SFR 419-121-012 $14.94SFR 419-121-013 $14.94SFR 419-121-015 $14.94SFR 419-121-016 $7.46VSFR 419-122-004 $14.94SFR 419-122-005 $29.88MFR2 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 419-122-006 $14.94SFR 419-122-007 $14.94SFR 419-122-008 $14.94SFR 419-122-009 $14.94SFR 419-122-011 $14.94SFR 419-122-013 $14.94SFR 419-122-016 $14.94SFR 419-122-017 $14.94SFR 419-122-019 $14.94SFR 419-122-020 $14.94SFR 419-122-022 $14.94SFR 419-122-023 $7.46VSFR 419-122-025 $14.94SFR 419-122-029 $14.94SFR 419-122-030 $14.94SFR 419-122-031 $7.46VSFR 419-122-032 $7.46VSFR 419-122-033 $7.46VSFR 419-122-034 $7.46VSFR 419-122-035 $7.46VSFR 419-122-036 $7.46VSFR 419-122-037 $7.46VSFR 419-122-038 $7.46VSFR 419-122-039 $7.46VSFR 419-123-001 $14.94SFR 419-123-003 $14.94SFR 419-123-006 $14.94SFR 419-123-007 $14.94SFR 419-123-010 $14.94SFR 419-123-011 $14.94SFR 419-123-012 $14.94SFR 419-123-013 $14.94SFR 419-123-014 $14.94SFR 419-123-015 $14.94SFR 419-123-018 $14.94SFR 419-123-019 $14.94SFR 419-123-020 $14.94SFR 419-123-021 $14.94SFR 419-123-022 $14.94SFR 419-123-023 $7.46VSFR 419-123-024 $7.46VSFR 419-123-025 $7.46VSFR 419-123-026 $7.46VSFR 419-123-027 $7.46VSFR 419-123-028 $7.46VSFR 419-123-029 $7.46VSFR 419-123-030 $14.94SFR 419-123-031 $14.94SFR 419-123-032 $7.46VSFR 419-123-033 $7.46VSFR 419-123-034 $7.46VSFR 419-123-035 $7.46VSFR - 216 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 419-123-038 $14.94SFR 419-124-002 $14.94SFR 419-124-003 $14.94SFR 419-124-005 $14.94SFR 419-124-006 $14.94SFR 419-124-007 $14.94SFR 419-124-008 $7.46VSFR 419-124-009 $7.46VSFR 419-124-010 $14.94SFR 419-124-011 $14.94SFR 419-125-002 $14.94SFR 419-125-004 $14.94SFR 419-125-005 $14.94SFR 419-125-006 $14.94SFR 419-125-007 $14.94SFR 419-141-006 $14.94SFR 419-141-009 $14.94SFR 419-141-011 $14.94SFR 419-141-016 $14.94SFR 419-141-017 $14.94SFR 419-141-018 $14.94SFR 419-141-019 $14.94SFR 419-142-003 $14.94SFR 419-142-004 $14.94SFR 419-142-005 $14.94SFR 419-142-007 $14.94SFR 419-142-009 $14.94SFR 419-142-010 $14.94SFR 419-142-011 $14.94SFR 419-142-012 $14.94SFR 419-142-013 $14.94SFR 419-142-014 $14.94SFR 419-142-017 $7.46VSFR 419-142-018 $14.94SFR 419-142-019 $7.46VSFR 419-142-020 $7.46VSFR 419-142-021 $7.46VSFR 419-142-022 $7.46VSFR 419-142-023 $7.46VSFR 419-142-024 $7.46VSFR 419-142-025 $7.46VSFR 419-142-026 $7.46VSFR 419-142-027 $7.46VSFR 419-142-028 $7.46VSFR 419-142-029 $7.46VSFR 419-142-030 $7.46VSFR 419-142-031 $7.46VSFR 419-142-032 $7.46VSFR 419-142-033 $7.46VSFR 419-142-034 $7.46VSFR 419-142-035 $7.46VSFR 419-142-036 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 419-142-037 $7.46VSFR 419-192-005 $14.94SFR 419-192-015 $7.46VSFR 419-192-018 $14.94SFR 419-192-019 $7.46VSFR 420-010-001 $74.70COM 420-010-002 $14.94SFR 420-010-005 $74.70INST 420-010-006 $74.70COM 420-010-007 $74.70COM 420-010-008 $74.70COM 420-010-009 $74.70COM 420-010-015 $74.70COM 420-010-016 $74.70COM 420-010-021 $74.70COM 420-010-022 $74.70INST 420-010-023 $74.70COM 420-010-025 $74.70COM 420-021-002 $74.70COM 420-021-019 $74.70COM 420-021-022 $74.70COM 420-021-029 $7.46VCOM 420-021-032 $74.70COM 420-021-035 $7.46VCOM 420-021-036 $74.70COM 420-021-045 $74.70COM 420-021-046 $74.70COM 420-021-047 $74.70COM 420-021-048 $74.70COM 420-021-049 $74.70COM 420-022-003 $74.70COM 420-022-011 $74.70COM 420-031-003 $14.94SFR 420-031-004 $14.94SFR 420-031-005 $14.94SFR 420-031-006 $14.94SFR 420-031-007 $14.94SFR 420-031-008 $14.94SFR 420-031-009 $14.94SFR 420-031-010 $14.94SFR 420-031-011 $14.94SFR 420-031-012 $14.94SFR 420-031-013 $14.94SFR 420-031-017 $14.94SFR 420-031-018 $14.94SFR 420-031-019 $14.94SFR 420-031-020 $14.94SFR 420-031-021 $14.94SFR 420-031-022 $14.94SFR 420-031-023 $14.94SFR 420-031-024 $14.94SFR 420-031-025 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 420-031-032 $14.94SFR 420-031-033 $29.88MFR2 420-031-034 $14.94SFR 420-031-035 $29.88MFR2 420-032-001 $14.94SFR 420-032-002 $14.94SFR 420-032-003 $14.94SFR 420-032-004 $14.94SFR 420-032-005 $14.94SFR 420-032-006 $14.94SFR 420-032-007 $14.94SFR 420-032-008 $14.94SFR 420-032-009 $14.94SFR 420-033-001 $14.94SFR 420-033-002 $14.94SFR 420-033-003 $14.94SFR 420-033-004 $14.94SFR 420-033-005 $14.94SFR 420-033-006 $14.94SFR 420-033-007 $14.94SFR 420-033-008 $14.94SFR 420-033-009 $14.94SFR 420-033-010 $14.94SFR 420-033-011 $14.94SFR 420-033-012 $14.94SFR 420-033-013 $14.94SFR 420-033-014 $14.94SFR 420-033-015 $14.94SFR 420-033-016 $14.94SFR 420-033-017 $14.94SFR 420-033-018 $14.94SFR 420-033-019 $14.94SFR 420-033-020 $14.94SFR 420-034-001 $14.94SFR 420-034-002 $14.94SFR 420-034-003 $14.94SFR 420-034-004 $14.94SFR 420-034-005 $14.94SFR 420-034-006 $14.94SFR 420-034-007 $14.94SFR 420-034-008 $14.94SFR 420-034-009 $14.94SFR 420-034-010 $14.94SFR 420-034-011 $14.94SFR 420-034-012 $14.94SFR 420-071-004 $14.94SFR 420-071-008 $14.94SFR 420-071-009 $14.94SFR 420-071-010 $14.94SFR 420-071-011 $14.94SFR 420-071-012 $7.46VSFR 420-071-013 $14.94SFR - 217 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 420-071-014 $7.46VSFR 420-071-015 $14.94SFR 420-071-018 $7.46VSFR 420-071-020 $7.46VSFR 420-071-021 $7.46VSFR 420-071-023 $14.94SFR 420-071-024 $14.94SFR 420-071-025 $14.94SFR 420-071-026 $14.94SFR 420-071-027 $14.94SFR 420-071-028 $14.94SFR 420-071-029 $14.94SFR 420-071-030 $14.94SFR 420-071-031 $14.94SFR 420-071-032 $14.94SFR 420-071-033 $14.94SFR 420-071-034 $14.94SFR 420-071-035 $14.94SFR 420-071-038 $14.94SFR 420-071-039 $14.94SFR 420-071-040 $14.94SFR 420-071-041 $14.94SFR 420-071-042 $14.94SFR 420-071-043 $14.94SFR 420-071-044 $14.94SFR 420-071-045 $14.94SFR 420-071-046 $14.94SFR 420-071-047 $14.94SFR 420-071-048 $14.94SFR 420-072-002 $14.94SFR 420-072-003 $14.94SFR 420-072-004 $14.94SFR 420-072-005 $14.94SFR 420-072-006 $14.94SFR 420-072-007 $14.94SFR 420-072-008 $14.94SFR 420-072-009 $14.94SFR 420-072-010 $14.94SFR 420-072-011 $14.94SFR 420-072-012 $7.46VSFR 420-072-013 $14.94SFR 420-072-014 $14.94SFR 420-072-015 $14.94SFR 420-072-016 $14.94SFR 420-072-017 $14.94SFR 420-072-018 $7.46VSFR 420-072-019 $7.46VSFR 420-072-020 $7.46VSFR 420-072-021 $14.94SFR 420-072-022 $14.94SFR 420-072-023 $14.94SFR 420-072-024 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 420-072-025 $14.94SFR 420-072-026 $14.94SFR 420-080-003 $14.94SFR 420-080-004 $14.94SFR 420-080-005 $14.94SFR 420-080-006 $14.94SFR 420-080-009 $14.94SFR 420-080-010 $14.94SFR 420-080-025 $74.70INST 420-080-026 $14.94SFR 420-090-002 $14.94SFR 420-090-003 $14.94SFR 420-090-004 $14.94SFR 420-090-005 $14.94SFR 420-090-006 $14.94SFR 420-090-007 $14.94SFR 420-090-008 $14.94SFR 420-090-009 $14.94SFR 420-090-012 $14.94SFR 420-090-013 $7.46VSFR 420-090-014 $7.46VSFR 420-090-015 $7.46VSFR 420-090-016 $14.94SFR 420-090-017 $14.94SFR 420-090-018 $14.94SFR 420-090-019 $14.94SFR 420-090-020 $14.94SFR 420-090-021 $14.94SFR 420-090-022 $14.94SFR 420-090-023 $14.94SFR 420-090-024 $14.94SFR 420-090-025 $14.94SFR 420-090-026 $14.94SFR 420-090-027 $14.94SFR 420-090-028 $14.94SFR 420-090-029 $7.46VSFR 420-090-034 $74.70INST 420-090-035 $14.94SFR 420-090-036 $14.94SFR 420-090-037 $14.94SFR 420-140-002 $74.70COM 420-140-003 $74.70INST 420-140-007 $74.70COM 420-140-010 $14.94SFR 420-140-011 $14.94SFR 420-140-013 $14.94SFR 420-140-014 $14.94SFR 420-140-015 $14.94SFR 420-140-016 $14.94SFR 420-140-017 $14.94SFR 420-140-018 $14.94SFR 420-140-019 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 420-140-020 $14.94SFR 420-140-021 $14.94SFR 420-140-022 $14.94SFR 420-140-023 $14.94SFR 420-140-024 $14.94SFR 420-140-025 $14.94SFR 420-140-026 $14.94SFR 420-140-027 $14.94SFR 420-140-028 $14.94SFR 420-140-029 $14.94SFR 420-140-030 $14.94SFR 420-140-031 $14.94SFR 420-140-035 $74.70COM 420-140-036 $74.70COM 420-140-037 $74.70COM 420-140-038 $74.70COM 420-140-039 $74.70COM 420-140-040 $74.70INST 420-150-006 $14.94SFR 420-150-007 $14.94SFR 420-150-008 $14.94SFR 420-150-009 $14.94SFR 420-150-010 $14.94SFR 420-150-011 $14.94SFR 420-150-013 $74.70COM 420-150-014 $74.70COM 420-150-015 $74.70COM 420-150-016 $74.70COM 420-150-022 $74.70COM 420-150-023 $74.70COM 420-150-025 $14.94SFR 420-150-026 $14.94SFR 420-150-030 $7.46VSFR 420-150-035 $74.70COM 420-150-038 $74.70COM 420-171-001 $14.94SFR 420-171-002 $14.94SFR 420-171-003 $14.94SFR 420-171-004 $14.94SFR 420-171-005 $14.94SFR 420-171-006 $14.94SFR 420-171-007 $14.94SFR 420-171-008 $14.94SFR 420-171-009 $14.94SFR 420-171-010 $14.94SFR 420-171-011 $14.94SFR 420-172-001 $14.94SFR 420-172-002 $14.94SFR 420-172-003 $14.94SFR 420-172-004 $14.94SFR 420-172-005 $14.94SFR 420-172-006 $14.94SFR - 218 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 420-172-007 $14.94SFR 420-172-008 $14.94SFR 420-172-009 $14.94SFR 420-172-010 $14.94SFR 420-172-011 $14.94SFR 420-172-012 $14.94SFR 420-172-013 $14.94SFR 420-172-014 $14.94SFR 420-172-015 $14.94SFR 420-172-016 $14.94SFR 420-172-019 $7.46VSFR 420-172-021 $7.46VSFR 420-172-022 $14.94SFR 420-172-023 $7.46VSFR 420-172-025 $7.46VSFR 420-172-026 $7.46VSFR 420-172-027 $7.46VSFR 420-172-029 $14.94SFR 420-172-030 $14.94SFR 420-172-031 $14.94SFR 420-172-032 $14.94SFR 420-172-033 $14.94SFR 420-172-034 $14.94SFR 420-172-036 $7.46VSFR 420-172-040 $14.94SFR 420-172-044 $14.94SFR 420-181-001 $14.94SFR 420-181-002 $14.94SFR 420-181-003 $14.94SFR 420-181-004 $14.94SFR 420-181-005 $14.94SFR 420-181-006 $14.94SFR 420-181-007 $14.94SFR 420-181-008 $14.94SFR 420-181-009 $14.94SFR 420-181-010 $14.94SFR 420-181-011 $14.94SFR 420-181-012 $14.94SFR 420-182-001 $14.94SFR 420-182-002 $14.94SFR 420-182-003 $14.94SFR 420-182-004 $14.94SFR 420-182-005 $14.94SFR 420-182-006 $14.94SFR 420-182-007 $14.94SFR 420-182-008 $14.94SFR 420-182-009 $14.94SFR 420-182-010 $14.94SFR 420-182-011 $14.94SFR 420-182-012 $14.94SFR 420-182-013 $14.94SFR 420-182-014 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 420-182-015 $14.94SFR 420-182-016 $14.94SFR 420-182-017 $14.94SFR 420-182-018 $14.94SFR 420-182-019 $14.94SFR 420-182-020 $14.94SFR 420-182-021 $14.94SFR 420-182-022 $14.94SFR 420-182-023 $14.94SFR 420-182-024 $14.94SFR 420-182-025 $14.94SFR 420-182-026 $14.94SFR 420-183-001 $14.94SFR 420-183-002 $14.94SFR 420-183-003 $14.94SFR 420-183-004 $14.94SFR 420-183-005 $14.94SFR 420-183-006 $14.94SFR 420-183-007 $14.94SFR 420-183-008 $14.94SFR 420-183-009 $14.94SFR 420-183-010 $14.94SFR 420-183-011 $14.94SFR 420-183-012 $14.94SFR 420-183-013 $14.94SFR 420-183-014 $14.94SFR 420-183-015 $14.94SFR 420-183-016 $14.94SFR 420-183-017 $14.94SFR 420-183-018 $14.94SFR 420-183-019 $14.94SFR 420-184-001 $14.94SFR 420-184-002 $14.94SFR 420-184-003 $14.94SFR 420-184-004 $14.94SFR 420-184-005 $14.94SFR 420-184-006 $14.94SFR 420-184-007 $14.94SFR 420-184-008 $14.94SFR 420-184-009 $14.94SFR 420-184-012 $14.94SFR 420-184-013 $14.94SFR 420-184-015 $7.46VSFR 420-184-016 $14.94SFR 420-191-001 $14.94SFR 420-191-002 $14.94SFR 420-191-003 $14.94SFR 420-191-004 $14.94SFR 420-191-005 $14.94SFR 420-191-006 $14.94SFR 420-191-007 $14.94SFR 420-191-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 420-191-009 $14.94SFR 420-191-010 $44.82MFR 420-191-011 $44.82MFR 420-191-016 $74.70MFR5 420-191-018 $74.70MFR5 420-191-021 $74.70COM 420-192-001 $74.70COM 420-192-002 $74.70COM 420-192-006 $14.94SFR 420-192-007 $14.94SFR 420-192-010 $74.70COM 420-192-011 $74.70COM 420-192-012 $74.70COM 420-192-013 $74.70COM 420-192-018 $7.46VSFR 420-192-020 $14.94SFR 420-192-021 $14.94SFR 420-192-022 $14.94SFR 420-192-023 $14.94SFR 420-192-024 $14.94SFR 420-192-025 $14.94SFR 420-192-026 $14.94SFR 420-192-027 $14.94SFR 420-192-028 $14.94SFR 420-192-029 $14.94SFR 420-192-030 $14.94SFR 420-192-031 $14.94SFR 420-192-032 $14.94SFR 420-192-034 $14.94SFR 420-192-035 $14.94SFR 420-192-036 $14.94SFR 420-192-037 $7.46VCOM 420-192-041 $74.70COM 420-192-042 $7.46VCOM 420-192-043 $7.46VCOM 420-192-044 $74.70COM 420-192-046 $74.70COM 420-192-050 $14.94SFR 420-192-051 $74.70COM 420-193-010 $74.70COM 420-193-011 $74.70COM 420-193-012 $74.70COM 420-230-001 $14.94SFR 420-230-002 $14.94SFR 420-230-003 $14.94SFR 420-230-004 $14.94SFR 420-230-005 $14.94SFR 420-230-006 $14.94SFR 420-230-007 $14.94SFR 420-230-008 $14.94SFR 420-230-009 $14.94SFR 420-230-010 $14.94SFR - 219 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 420-230-011 $14.94SFR 420-230-012 $14.94SFR 420-230-013 $14.94SFR 420-230-014 $14.94SFR 420-230-015 $14.94SFR 420-230-016 $14.94SFR 420-230-017 $14.94SFR 420-230-018 $14.94SFR 420-230-019 $14.94SFR 420-230-020 $14.94SFR 420-230-021 $14.94SFR 420-230-022 $14.94SFR 420-230-023 $14.94SFR 420-230-025 $14.94SFR 420-230-026 $14.94SFR 420-230-027 $14.94SFR 420-230-028 $14.94SFR 420-230-029 $14.94SFR 420-230-030 $14.94SFR 420-230-031 $14.94SFR 420-230-032 $14.94SFR 420-230-033 $14.94SFR 420-230-034 $14.94SFR 420-230-035 $14.94SFR 420-230-036 $14.94SFR 420-230-037 $14.94SFR 420-230-038 $14.94SFR 420-230-039 $14.94SFR 420-230-040 $14.94SFR 420-230-041 $14.94SFR 420-230-042 $14.94SFR 420-230-043 $14.94SFR 420-230-044 $14.94SFR 420-230-045 $14.94SFR 420-230-046 $14.94SFR 420-230-047 $14.94SFR 420-230-050 $14.94SFR 420-230-051 $14.94SFR 420-230-052 $14.94SFR 420-230-053 $14.94SFR 420-230-054 $14.94SFR 420-230-055 $14.94SFR 420-230-056 $14.94SFR 420-230-057 $14.94SFR 420-230-058 $14.94SFR 420-230-059 $14.94SFR 420-230-060 $14.94SFR 420-230-061 $14.94SFR 420-230-062 $14.94SFR 420-230-063 $14.94SFR 420-230-064 $14.94SFR 420-230-065 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 420-230-066 $14.94SFR 420-230-073 $14.94SFR 420-230-075 $14.94SFR 420-230-076 $14.94SFR 420-230-077 $14.94SFR 425-011-001 $74.70INST 425-011-003 $14.94SFR 425-011-004 $14.94SFR 425-011-005 $14.94SFR 425-011-006 $14.94SFR 425-011-007 $14.94SFR 425-011-008 $14.94SFR 425-011-009 $14.94SFR 425-011-010 $14.94SFR 425-011-011 $14.94SFR 425-011-012 $14.94SFR 425-011-013 $14.94SFR 425-012-001 $14.94SFR 425-012-002 $14.94SFR 425-012-003 $14.94SFR 425-012-004 $14.94SFR 425-012-005 $14.94SFR 425-012-006 $14.94SFR 425-012-007 $14.94SFR 425-012-008 $14.94SFR 425-012-009 $14.94SFR 425-012-010 $14.94SFR 425-012-011 $14.94SFR 425-012-012 $14.94SFR 425-012-013 $14.94SFR 425-012-014 $14.94SFR 425-012-015 $14.94SFR 425-012-016 $14.94SFR 425-012-019 $14.94SFR 425-012-020 $14.94SFR 425-012-021 $14.94SFR 425-012-022 $14.94SFR 425-012-023 $14.94SFR 425-012-024 $14.94SFR 425-012-025 $14.94SFR 425-012-026 $14.94SFR 425-012-027 $14.94SFR 425-012-028 $14.94SFR 425-013-001 $14.94SFR 425-013-002 $14.94SFR 425-013-003 $14.94SFR 425-013-004 $14.94SFR 425-013-005 $14.94SFR 425-013-006 $14.94SFR 425-013-007 $14.94SFR 425-013-008 $14.94SFR 425-013-009 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-013-010 $14.94SFR 425-013-011 $14.94SFR 425-013-012 $14.94SFR 425-013-013 $14.94SFR 425-013-014 $14.94SFR 425-013-015 $14.94SFR 425-013-016 $14.94SFR 425-013-017 $14.94SFR 425-013-018 $14.94SFR 425-013-019 $14.94SFR 425-013-020 $14.94SFR 425-013-021 $14.94SFR 425-013-022 $14.94SFR 425-013-023 $14.94SFR 425-013-024 $14.94SFR 425-013-025 $14.94SFR 425-014-003 $14.94SFR 425-014-004 $14.94SFR 425-014-005 $14.94SFR 425-014-006 $14.94SFR 425-014-007 $14.94SFR 425-014-008 $14.94SFR 425-014-009 $14.94SFR 425-014-010 $14.94SFR 425-014-011 $14.94SFR 425-014-012 $14.94SFR 425-014-013 $14.94SFR 425-014-014 $74.70MFR5 425-014-015 $14.94SFR 425-014-016 $14.94SFR 425-014-017 $14.94SFR 425-014-018 $14.94SFR 425-014-019 $14.94SFR 425-014-020 $29.88MFR2 425-014-021 $14.94SFR 425-014-022 $14.94SFR 425-014-023 $14.94SFR 425-014-024 $14.94SFR 425-014-025 $14.94SFR 425-014-026 $14.94SFR 425-014-027 $29.88MFR2 425-014-028 $14.94SFR 425-014-029 $14.94SFR 425-014-030 $14.94SFR 425-014-031 $14.94SFR 425-014-033 $14.94SFR 425-014-034 $7.46VSFR 425-021-001 $74.70INST 425-021-002 $14.94SFR 425-021-004 $14.94SFR 425-021-005 $14.94SFR 425-021-006 $14.94SFR - 220 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-021-007 $14.94SFR 425-021-008 $14.94SFR 425-021-009 $14.94SFR 425-021-010 $14.94SFR 425-021-011 $14.94SFR 425-021-012 $14.94SFR 425-021-013 $14.94SFR 425-021-014 $14.94SFR 425-021-015 $14.94SFR 425-021-016 $14.94SFR 425-022-001 $14.94SFR 425-022-002 $14.94SFR 425-022-003 $14.94SFR 425-022-004 $14.94SFR 425-022-005 $14.94SFR 425-022-006 $14.94SFR 425-022-007 $14.94SFR 425-022-008 $14.94SFR 425-022-009 $14.94SFR 425-022-010 $14.94SFR 425-022-011 $14.94SFR 425-022-012 $14.94SFR 425-022-013 $14.94SFR 425-022-014 $14.94SFR 425-022-015 $14.94SFR 425-022-016 $29.88MFR2 425-022-017 $14.94SFR 425-022-018 $14.94SFR 425-022-019 $14.94SFR 425-022-020 $14.94SFR 425-023-001 $14.94SFR 425-023-002 $14.94SFR 425-023-003 $14.94SFR 425-023-004 $14.94SFR 425-023-005 $14.94SFR 425-023-006 $14.94SFR 425-023-007 $14.94SFR 425-023-008 $14.94SFR 425-023-009 $14.94SFR 425-023-010 $14.94SFR 425-023-011 $7.46VSFR 425-023-012 $14.94SFR 425-031-001 $14.94SFR 425-031-002 $14.94SFR 425-031-003 $14.94SFR 425-031-004 $14.94SFR 425-031-005 $14.94SFR 425-031-006 $14.94SFR 425-031-007 $14.94SFR 425-032-001 $14.94SFR 425-032-002 $14.94SFR 425-032-003 $29.88MFR2 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-032-004 $14.94SFR 425-032-005 $14.94SFR 425-032-006 $14.94SFR 425-032-007 $14.94SFR 425-032-008 $14.94SFR 425-032-009 $14.94SFR 425-032-010 $14.94SFR 425-040-003 $14.94SFR 425-040-004 $14.94SFR 425-040-005 $14.94SFR 425-040-008 $14.94SFR 425-040-009 $14.94SFR 425-040-010 $14.94SFR 425-040-011 $14.94SFR 425-040-012 $14.94SFR 425-040-013 $14.94SFR 425-040-014 $14.94SFR 425-040-015 $14.94SFR 425-040-016 $7.46VSFR 425-040-017 $14.94SFR 425-040-018 $14.94SFR 425-040-019 $14.94SFR 425-040-020 $14.94SFR 425-040-021 $14.94SFR 425-040-022 $14.94SFR 425-040-023 $14.94SFR 425-040-024 $7.46VSFR 425-040-028 $14.94SFR 425-040-030 $14.94SFR 425-040-031 $14.94SFR 425-040-032 $14.94SFR 425-050-002 $14.94SFR 425-050-003 $14.94SFR 425-050-004 $14.94SFR 425-050-005 $14.94SFR 425-050-006 $14.94SFR 425-050-007 $14.94SFR 425-050-008 $14.94SFR 425-050-009 $14.94SFR 425-050-013 $14.94SFR 425-050-014 $14.94SFR 425-061-002 $14.94SFR 425-061-009 $14.94SFR 425-061-012 $7.46VSFR 425-061-013 $14.94SFR 425-061-014 $14.94SFR 425-061-015 $14.94SFR 425-061-016 $14.94SFR 425-061-017 $14.94SFR 425-061-018 $14.94SFR 425-061-019 $14.94SFR 425-061-020 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-061-022 $14.94SFR 425-061-023 $14.94SFR 425-061-024 $14.94SFR 425-061-025 $14.94SFR 425-061-026 $14.94SFR 425-061-027 $14.94SFR 425-061-028 $14.94SFR 425-061-029 $14.94SFR 425-061-030 $14.94SFR 425-061-031 $14.94SFR 425-061-032 $7.46VSFR 425-061-033 $7.46VSFR 425-061-034 $7.46VSFR 425-062-003 $14.94SFR 425-062-004 $14.94SFR 425-062-005 $14.94SFR 425-062-008 $14.94SFR 425-062-015 $14.94SFR 425-062-016 $14.94SFR 425-062-017 $14.94SFR 425-062-019 $14.94SFR 425-062-020 $14.94SFR 425-062-024 $14.94SFR 425-071-001 $14.94SFR 425-071-002 $14.94SFR 425-071-003 $14.94SFR 425-071-004 $14.94SFR 425-071-005 $14.94SFR 425-071-006 $14.94SFR 425-071-008 $14.94SFR 425-071-009 $14.94SFR 425-071-013 $14.94SFR 425-071-014 $14.94SFR 425-071-015 $14.94SFR 425-071-017 $14.94SFR 425-071-019 $29.88MFR2 425-071-020 $14.94SFR 425-071-021 $14.94SFR 425-071-022 $14.94SFR 425-071-024 $14.94SFR 425-071-025 $14.94SFR 425-071-026 $14.94SFR 425-071-027 $14.94SFR 425-071-028 $14.94SFR 425-071-029 $14.94SFR 425-071-030 $14.94SFR 425-071-031 $14.94SFR 425-072-001 $14.94SFR 425-072-002 $14.94SFR 425-072-003 $14.94SFR 425-072-004 $14.94SFR 425-072-010 $14.94SFR - 221 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-072-011 $14.94SFR 425-072-012 $14.94SFR 425-072-013 $7.46VSFR 425-072-014 $14.94SFR 425-072-015 $14.94SFR 425-072-016 $14.94SFR 425-072-017 $14.94SFR 425-072-020 $14.94SFR 425-072-022 $29.88MFR2 425-072-023 $29.88MFR2 425-072-024 $7.46VSFR 425-072-027 $14.94SFR 425-072-032 $14.94SFR 425-072-036 $14.94SFR 425-072-037 $14.94SFR 425-081-001 $14.94SFR 425-081-002 $14.94SFR 425-081-005 $14.94SFR 425-081-006 $14.94SFR 425-081-007 $14.94SFR 425-081-009 $14.94SFR 425-081-011 $14.94SFR 425-081-012 $14.94SFR 425-081-013 $14.94SFR 425-081-014 $14.94SFR 425-081-015 $14.94SFR 425-081-016 $14.94SFR 425-081-017 $14.94SFR 425-081-018 $14.94SFR 425-081-019 $14.94SFR 425-081-020 $14.94SFR 425-081-021 $14.94SFR 425-081-022 $14.94SFR 425-081-023 $14.94SFR 425-081-024 $14.94SFR 425-081-025 $14.94SFR 425-081-026 $14.94SFR 425-081-027 $14.94SFR 425-081-028 $14.94SFR 425-081-029 $14.94SFR 425-081-030 $14.94SFR 425-081-031 $14.94SFR 425-081-032 $14.94SFR 425-081-033 $14.94SFR 425-081-034 $14.94SFR 425-081-035 $14.94SFR 425-081-036 $14.94SFR 425-081-037 $14.94SFR 425-081-038 $14.94SFR 425-081-039 $14.94SFR 425-081-040 $14.94SFR 425-081-041 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-081-042 $14.94SFR 425-081-043 $14.94SFR 425-081-044 $14.94SFR 425-081-045 $14.94SFR 425-081-046 $14.94SFR 425-081-047 $14.94SFR 425-081-048 $14.94SFR 425-081-049 $14.94SFR 425-081-050 $14.94SFR 425-081-051 $14.94SFR 425-081-052 $14.94SFR 425-081-054 $14.94SFR 425-081-055 $14.94SFR 425-081-056 $14.94SFR 425-081-057 $14.94SFR 425-082-001 $14.94SFR 425-082-002 $14.94SFR 425-082-003 $14.94SFR 425-082-004 $14.94SFR 425-082-005 $14.94SFR 425-082-006 $14.94SFR 425-082-007 $14.94SFR 425-082-008 $14.94SFR 425-083-001 $14.94SFR 425-083-002 $14.94SFR 425-083-003 $14.94SFR 425-083-004 $14.94SFR 425-083-005 $14.94SFR 425-083-007 $14.94SFR 425-083-008 $14.94SFR 425-083-009 $14.94SFR 425-083-010 $14.94SFR 425-083-011 $14.94SFR 425-083-012 $14.94SFR 425-083-013 $14.94SFR 425-083-014 $14.94SFR 425-083-015 $14.94SFR 425-083-016 $14.94SFR 425-091-010 $74.70MFR5 425-091-011 $14.94SFR 425-091-012 $14.94SFR 425-091-013 $14.94SFR 425-091-015 $14.94SFR 425-091-016 $14.94SFR 425-091-017 $74.70MFR5 425-091-019 $74.70MFR5 425-091-020 $74.70MFR5 425-091-021 $74.70MFR5 425-091-022 $74.70MFR5 425-091-023 $74.70MFR5 425-091-024 $74.70MFR5 425-091-025 $74.70MFR5 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-091-026 $74.70MFR5 425-091-027 $74.70MFR5 425-091-028 $74.70MFR5 425-091-032 $104.58MFR7 425-091-033 $74.70COM 425-091-034 $89.64MFR6 425-091-035 $74.70COM 425-091-036 $89.64MFR6 425-091-037 $29.88MFR2 425-091-038 $74.70COM 425-091-039 $14.94SFR 425-092-001 $14.94SFR 425-092-002 $14.94SFR 425-092-003 $14.94SFR 425-092-004 $14.94SFR 425-092-005 $14.94SFR 425-092-006 $14.94SFR 425-092-007 $29.88MFR2 425-092-010 $74.70COM 425-092-011 $14.94SFR 425-100-017 $44.82MFR 425-100-019 $14.94SFR 425-100-026 $104.58MFR7 425-100-029 $14.94SFR 425-100-030 $14.94SFR 425-100-031 $14.94SFR 425-100-032 $14.94SFR 425-100-033 $14.94SFR 425-100-034 $14.94SFR 425-100-035 $14.94SFR 425-100-036 $29.88MFR2 425-100-037 $74.70COM 425-100-039 $14.94SFR 425-100-040 $74.70INST 425-100-045 $14.94SFR 425-100-046 $74.70MFR5 425-100-047 $74.70IND 425-100-049 $14.94SFR 425-100-050 $14.94SFR 425-100-051 $14.94SFR 425-100-052 $14.94SFR 425-100-053 $14.94SFR 425-100-054 $7.46VCOM 425-100-055 $14.94SFR 425-100-056 $7.46VCOM 425-100-060 $14.94SFR 425-100-061 $14.94SFR 425-110-001 $14.94SFR 425-110-003 $14.94SFR 425-110-004 $14.94SFR 425-110-005 $44.82MFR 425-110-006 $14.94SFR - 222 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-110-014 $14.94SFR 425-110-017 $14.94SFR 425-110-018 $104.58MFR7 425-110-021 $89.64MFR6 425-110-025 $7.46VSFR 425-110-026 $7.46VSFR 425-110-027 $7.46VMFR 425-121-002 $14.94SFR 425-121-003 $14.94SFR 425-121-004 $14.94SFR 425-121-005 $14.94SFR 425-121-006 $14.94SFR 425-122-001 $14.94SFR 425-122-002 $14.94SFR 425-122-003 $14.94SFR 425-122-004 $14.94SFR 425-122-008 $14.94SFR 425-122-011 $14.94SFR 425-122-012 $14.94SFR 425-123-001 $14.94SFR 425-123-002 $14.94SFR 425-123-003 $14.94SFR 425-123-004 $14.94SFR 425-123-005 $14.94SFR 425-123-006 $14.94SFR 425-123-008 $14.94SFR 425-123-009 $14.94SFR 425-123-010 $14.94SFR 425-123-011 $14.94SFR 425-123-012 $14.94SFR 425-123-013 $14.94SFR 425-123-014 $14.94SFR 425-123-015 $14.94SFR 425-123-016 $14.94SFR 425-123-017 $14.94SFR 425-123-018 $14.94SFR 425-123-019 $14.94SFR 425-123-020 $14.94SFR 425-123-021 $14.94SFR 425-123-022 $14.94SFR 425-123-023 $14.94SFR 425-123-024 $14.94SFR 425-123-025 $14.94SFR 425-123-028 $7.46VMFR 425-130-001 $14.94SFR 425-130-002 $7.46VSFR 425-130-003 $14.94SFR 425-130-004 $14.94SFR 425-130-005 $14.94SFR 425-130-006 $14.94SFR 425-130-007 $14.94SFR 425-130-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-130-009 $14.94SFR 425-130-010 $7.46VSFR 425-130-011 $14.94SFR 425-130-012 $14.94SFR 425-130-013 $14.94SFR 425-130-014 $14.94SFR 425-130-015 $14.94SFR 425-130-016 $14.94SFR 425-130-018 $14.94SFR 425-130-019 $14.94SFR 425-130-020 $14.94SFR 425-130-021 $14.94SFR 425-130-022 $14.94SFR 425-130-023 $14.94SFR 425-130-024 $14.94SFR 425-130-025 $14.94SFR 425-130-026 $14.94SFR 425-130-027 $14.94SFR 425-130-028 $14.94SFR 425-130-029 $14.94SFR 425-130-030 $14.94SFR 425-130-031 $14.94SFR 425-141-002 $14.94SFR 425-141-003 $14.94SFR 425-141-004 $14.94SFR 425-141-005 $7.46VSFR 425-141-007 $14.94SFR 425-141-008 $14.94SFR 425-141-009 $14.94SFR 425-141-010 $14.94SFR 425-141-011 $14.94SFR 425-141-012 $14.94SFR 425-141-013 $14.94SFR 425-142-010 $14.94SFR 425-142-011 $14.94SFR 425-142-012 $14.94SFR 425-142-013 $14.94SFR 425-142-014 $14.94SFR 425-142-015 $7.46VSFR 425-142-017 $14.94SFR 425-142-018 $14.94SFR 425-142-019 $74.70COM 425-142-022 $74.70INST 425-142-023 $14.94SFR 425-142-024 $14.94SFR 425-142-025 $14.94SFR 425-142-026 $74.70COM 425-142-027 $14.94SFR 425-142-028 $14.94SFR 425-142-029 $74.70COM 425-142-030 $14.94SFR 425-142-031 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-142-034 $74.70COM 425-150-001 $14.94SFR 425-150-002 $14.94SFR 425-150-003 $14.94SFR 425-150-004 $14.94SFR 425-150-007 $14.94SFR 425-150-012 $14.94SFR 425-150-015 $14.94SFR 425-150-016 $14.94SFR 425-150-018 $14.94SFR 425-150-020 $14.94SFR 425-150-021 $14.94SFR 425-150-022 $14.94SFR 425-150-023 $14.94SFR 425-150-026 $14.94SFR 425-150-027 $14.94SFR 425-150-028 $14.94SFR 425-150-030 $14.94SFR 425-150-031 $14.94SFR 425-150-035 $14.94SFR 425-150-036 $14.94SFR 425-150-037 $14.94SFR 425-150-043 $14.94SFR 425-150-044 $14.94SFR 425-150-045 $14.94SFR 425-150-046 $7.46VSFR 425-150-047 $14.94SFR 425-150-049 $14.94SFR 425-150-050 $14.94SFR 425-150-051 $14.94SFR 425-150-052 $14.94SFR 425-150-053 $14.94SFR 425-170-024 $104.58MFR7 425-170-027 $74.70COM 425-170-028 $74.70COM 425-170-030 $7.46VCOM 425-170-031 $14.94SFR 425-170-033 $74.70MFR5 425-170-035 $74.70COM 425-170-036 $74.70MFR5 425-170-038 $14.94SFR 425-170-039 $14.94SFR 425-170-040 $14.94SFR 425-210-017 $74.70COM 425-210-037 $14.94SFR 425-210-039 $7.46VSFR 425-210-040 $89.64MFR6 425-210-042 $7.46VMFR 425-210-043 $14.94SFR 425-210-044 $7.46VMFR 425-210-045 $7.46VMFR 425-220-020 $74.70COM - 223 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-220-027 $74.70INST 425-220-034 $104.58MFR7 425-220-035 $74.70COM 425-220-036 $74.70INST 425-220-037 $74.70INST 425-220-038 $74.70INST 425-220-044 $14.94SFR 425-220-045 $14.94SFR 425-220-047 $104.58MFR7 425-230-001 $74.70INST 425-230-002 $74.70COM 425-230-016 $14.94SFR 425-230-017 $14.94SFR 425-230-035 $74.70MFR5 425-230-036 $14.94SFR 425-230-037 $7.46VMFR 425-230-038 $14.94SFR 425-230-039 $14.94SFR 425-230-040 $14.94SFR 425-230-041 $14.94SFR 425-240-017 $74.70COM 425-240-024 $74.70COM 425-240-027 $74.70INST 425-240-033 $74.70COM 425-240-035 $74.70COM 425-240-036 $44.82MFR 425-240-039 $14.94SFR 425-240-040 $14.94SFR 425-240-041 $7.46VSFR 425-251-002 $74.70COM 425-251-003 $74.70COM 425-251-005 $74.70COM 425-251-006 $7.46VCOM 425-251-007 $74.70COM 425-251-010 $74.70COM 425-251-011 $74.70COM 425-252-002 $14.94SFR 425-252-003 $14.94SFR 425-252-004 $14.94SFR 425-252-005 $14.94SFR 425-252-006 $14.94SFR 425-252-007 $14.94SFR 425-252-008 $14.94SFR 425-252-009 $14.94SFR 425-252-010 $14.94SFR 425-252-011 $14.94SFR 425-252-012 $14.94SFR 425-252-013 $14.94SFR 425-252-014 $14.94SFR 425-252-015 $14.94SFR 425-252-016 $14.94SFR 425-252-017 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-252-018 $14.94SFR 425-252-019 $14.94SFR 425-252-020 $14.94SFR 425-252-021 $14.94SFR 425-252-022 $14.94SFR 425-252-023 $14.94SFR 425-252-024 $14.94SFR 425-252-025 $14.94SFR 425-252-026 $14.94SFR 425-252-027 $14.94SFR 425-252-028 $14.94SFR 425-252-029 $14.94SFR 425-252-030 $14.94SFR 425-252-031 $14.94SFR 425-252-032 $14.94SFR 425-252-033 $14.94SFR 425-252-034 $14.94SFR 425-252-035 $14.94SFR 425-252-045 $7.46VCOM 425-252-048 $7.46VCOM 425-252-061 $89.64MFR6 425-252-063 $74.70COM 425-252-064 $74.70COM 425-270-001 $7.46CONDO 425-270-002 $7.46CONDO 425-270-003 $7.46CONDO 425-270-004 $7.46CONDO 425-270-005 $7.46CONDO 425-270-006 $7.46CONDO 425-270-007 $7.46CONDO 425-270-008 $7.46CONDO 425-270-009 $7.46CONDO 425-270-010 $7.46CONDO 425-270-011 $7.46CONDO 425-270-012 $7.46CONDO 425-270-013 $7.46CONDO 425-270-014 $7.46CONDO 425-270-015 $7.46CONDO 425-270-016 $7.46CONDO 425-270-017 $7.46CONDO 425-270-018 $7.46CONDO 425-270-019 $7.46CONDO 425-270-020 $7.46CONDO 425-270-021 $7.46CONDO 425-270-022 $7.46CONDO 425-270-023 $7.46CONDO 425-270-024 $7.46CONDO 425-270-025 $7.46CONDO 425-270-026 $7.46CONDO 425-270-027 $7.46CONDO 425-270-028 $7.46CONDO 425-270-029 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-270-030 $7.46CONDO 425-270-031 $7.46CONDO 425-270-032 $7.46CONDO 425-270-033 $7.46CONDO 425-270-034 $7.46CONDO 425-270-035 $7.46CONDO 425-270-036 $7.46CONDO 425-270-037 $7.46CONDO 425-280-001 $7.46CONDO 425-280-002 $7.46CONDO 425-280-003 $7.46CONDO 425-280-004 $7.46CONDO 425-280-005 $7.46CONDO 425-280-006 $7.46CONDO 425-280-007 $7.46CONDO 425-280-008 $7.46CONDO 425-280-009 $7.46CONDO 425-280-010 $7.46CONDO 425-280-011 $7.46CONDO 425-280-012 $7.46CONDO 425-280-013 $7.46CONDO 425-280-014 $7.46CONDO 425-280-015 $7.46CONDO 425-280-016 $7.46CONDO 425-280-017 $7.46CONDO 425-280-018 $7.46CONDO 425-280-019 $7.46CONDO 425-280-020 $7.46CONDO 425-280-021 $7.46CONDO 425-280-022 $7.46CONDO 425-280-023 $7.46CONDO 425-280-024 $7.46CONDO 425-280-025 $7.46CONDO 425-280-026 $7.46CONDO 425-280-027 $7.46CONDO 425-280-028 $7.46CONDO 425-280-029 $7.46CONDO 425-280-030 $7.46CONDO 425-280-031 $7.46CONDO 425-280-032 $7.46CONDO 425-280-033 $7.46CONDO 425-280-034 $7.46CONDO 425-280-035 $7.46CONDO 425-280-036 $7.46CONDO 425-280-037 $7.46CONDO 425-280-038 $7.46CONDO 425-300-001 $7.46CONDO 425-300-002 $7.46CONDO 425-300-003 $7.46CONDO 425-300-004 $7.46CONDO 425-300-005 $7.46CONDO 425-300-006 $7.46CONDO - 224 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-300-007 $7.46CONDO 425-300-008 $7.46CONDO 425-300-009 $7.46CONDO 425-300-010 $7.46CONDO 425-300-011 $7.46CONDO 425-300-020 $7.46CONDO 425-300-021 $7.46CONDO 425-300-022 $7.46CONDO 425-300-030 $7.46CONDO 425-300-031 $7.46CONDO 425-300-032 $7.46CONDO 425-300-033 $7.46CONDO 425-300-034 $7.46CONDO 425-300-035 $7.46CONDO 425-300-036 $7.46CONDO 425-300-037 $7.46CONDO 425-300-040 $7.46CONDO 425-300-041 $7.46CONDO 425-300-042 $7.46CONDO 425-300-043 $7.46CONDO 425-300-044 $7.46CONDO 425-300-045 $7.46CONDO 425-300-050 $7.46CONDO 425-300-051 $7.46CONDO 425-300-052 $7.46CONDO 425-300-053 $7.46CONDO 425-300-054 $7.46CONDO 425-300-060 $7.46CONDO 425-300-061 $7.46CONDO 425-300-062 $7.46CONDO 425-300-063 $7.46CONDO 425-300-064 $7.46CONDO 425-300-065 $7.46CONDO 425-300-070 $7.46CONDO 425-300-071 $7.46CONDO 425-300-072 $7.46CONDO 425-300-073 $7.46CONDO 425-300-074 $7.46CONDO 425-300-075 $7.46CONDO 425-300-076 $7.46CONDO 425-300-077 $7.46CONDO 425-300-078 $7.46CONDO 425-300-079 $7.46CONDO 425-300-081 $7.46CONDO 425-310-001 $14.94SFR 425-310-002 $14.94SFR 425-310-003 $14.94SFR 425-310-004 $14.94SFR 425-310-005 $14.94SFR 425-310-006 $14.94SFR 425-310-007 $14.94SFR 425-310-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 425-310-009 $7.46VSFR 425-310-010 $7.46VSFR 425-310-011 $14.94SFR 425-310-012 $14.94SFR 425-310-013 $14.94SFR 425-310-014 $14.94SFR 425-310-015 $14.94SFR 425-310-016 $14.94SFR 425-310-017 $14.94SFR 425-310-018 $14.94SFR 425-310-019 $14.94SFR 425-310-020 $7.46VSFR 425-310-021 $7.46VSFR 425-310-022 $7.46VSFR 425-310-023 $7.46VSFR 425-310-024 $7.46VSFR 425-310-025 $7.46VSFR 425-310-026 $7.46VSFR 425-310-027 $7.46VSFR 425-310-028 $7.46VSFR 425-310-029 $7.46VSFR 425-310-030 $7.46VSFR 425-310-031 $7.46VSFR 425-310-032 $7.46VSFR 426-020-025 $14.94SFR 426-030-001 $14.94SFR 426-030-002 $14.94SFR 426-030-010 $14.94SFR 426-030-011 $14.94SFR 426-030-012 $14.94SFR 426-030-013 $14.94SFR 426-030-014 $14.94SFR 426-030-015 $14.94SFR 426-030-016 $14.94SFR 426-030-017 $14.94SFR 426-030-018 $14.94SFR 426-030-021 $14.94SFR 426-030-022 $14.94SFR 426-030-023 $14.94SFR 426-030-024 $14.94SFR 426-030-025 $14.94SFR 426-030-026 $14.94SFR 426-030-027 $14.94SFR 426-030-028 $14.94SFR 426-030-029 $14.94SFR 426-030-031 $14.94SFR 426-030-033 $14.94SFR 426-030-034 $14.94SFR 426-030-038 $14.94SFR 426-030-039 $14.94SFR 426-030-040 $14.94SFR 426-030-041 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-030-042 $14.94SFR 426-030-070 $7.46VSFR 426-030-071 $7.46VSFR 426-040-023 $14.94SFR 426-040-024 $14.94SFR 426-040-025 $14.94SFR 426-040-026 $14.94SFR 426-040-027 $14.94SFR 426-040-029 $14.94SFR 426-040-030 $14.94SFR 426-040-031 $14.94SFR 426-040-032 $14.94SFR 426-040-033 $14.94SFR 426-040-034 $14.94SFR 426-040-035 $14.94SFR 426-040-036 $14.94SFR 426-040-039 $14.94SFR 426-040-040 $14.94SFR 426-040-041 $14.94SFR 426-040-042 $14.94SFR 426-040-043 $14.94SFR 426-040-044 $14.94SFR 426-040-045 $14.94SFR 426-040-046 $14.94SFR 426-040-047 $14.94SFR 426-040-048 $14.94SFR 426-040-049 $14.94SFR 426-040-050 $14.94SFR 426-040-051 $14.94SFR 426-040-052 $14.94SFR 426-040-053 $14.94SFR 426-040-054 $14.94SFR 426-040-055 $14.94SFR 426-040-056 $14.94SFR 426-040-057 $14.94SFR 426-040-058 $14.94SFR 426-040-062 $14.94SFR 426-040-063 $14.94SFR 426-040-064 $14.94SFR 426-040-065 $14.94SFR 426-040-066 $14.94SFR 426-040-067 $14.94SFR 426-040-068 $14.94SFR 426-040-069 $14.94SFR 426-040-070 $14.94SFR 426-040-071 $14.94SFR 426-040-077 $14.94SFR 426-051-001 $14.94SFR 426-051-002 $14.94SFR 426-051-003 $14.94SFR 426-051-004 $14.94SFR 426-051-005 $14.94SFR - 225 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-051-006 $14.94SFR 426-051-007 $14.94SFR 426-051-008 $14.94SFR 426-051-009 $14.94SFR 426-051-010 $14.94SFR 426-051-011 $14.94SFR 426-051-012 $14.94SFR 426-051-013 $14.94SFR 426-051-014 $14.94SFR 426-052-001 $14.94SFR 426-052-003 $14.94SFR 426-052-004 $14.94SFR 426-052-005 $29.88MFR2 426-052-006 $14.94SFR 426-052-007 $14.94SFR 426-052-008 $14.94SFR 426-052-009 $14.94SFR 426-052-010 $14.94SFR 426-052-011 $14.94SFR 426-052-012 $14.94SFR 426-052-013 $14.94SFR 426-052-016 $14.94SFR 426-052-017 $14.94SFR 426-052-018 $14.94SFR 426-052-019 $14.94SFR 426-052-020 $14.94SFR 426-060-012 $14.94SFR 426-060-052 $14.94SFR 426-060-053 $14.94SFR 426-060-054 $7.46VSFR 426-060-055 $14.94SFR 426-070-020 $7.46VSFR 426-091-001 $14.94SFR 426-091-002 $14.94SFR 426-091-003 $14.94SFR 426-091-004 $14.94SFR 426-091-005 $14.94SFR 426-091-006 $14.94SFR 426-091-007 $14.94SFR 426-091-008 $14.94SFR 426-091-009 $14.94SFR 426-091-010 $14.94SFR 426-091-011 $14.94SFR 426-091-012 $14.94SFR 426-091-013 $14.94SFR 426-091-014 $14.94SFR 426-091-015 $14.94SFR 426-092-001 $14.94SFR 426-092-002 $14.94SFR 426-092-003 $14.94SFR 426-092-004 $14.94SFR 426-092-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-092-006 $14.94SFR 426-092-007 $14.94SFR 426-092-008 $14.94SFR 426-092-009 $14.94SFR 426-093-001 $14.94SFR 426-093-002 $14.94SFR 426-093-003 $14.94SFR 426-093-004 $14.94SFR 426-093-005 $14.94SFR 426-093-006 $14.94SFR 426-093-007 $14.94SFR 426-093-008 $14.94SFR 426-093-009 $14.94SFR 426-093-010 $14.94SFR 426-093-011 $14.94SFR 426-093-012 $14.94SFR 426-093-013 $14.94SFR 426-093-014 $14.94SFR 426-093-015 $14.94SFR 426-093-016 $14.94SFR 426-101-002 $14.94SFR 426-102-001 $14.94SFR 426-102-002 $14.94SFR 426-103-001 $14.94SFR 426-103-002 $14.94SFR 426-103-003 $14.94SFR 426-104-001 $14.94SFR 426-104-002 $14.94SFR 426-104-003 $14.94SFR 426-104-004 $14.94SFR 426-104-005 $14.94SFR 426-104-006 $14.94SFR 426-104-007 $14.94SFR 426-104-008 $14.94SFR 426-104-009 $14.94SFR 426-104-010 $14.94SFR 426-104-011 $14.94SFR 426-104-012 $14.94SFR 426-104-014 $14.94SFR 426-104-015 $14.94SFR 426-104-016 $14.94SFR 426-104-017 $14.94SFR 426-104-018 $14.94SFR 426-104-019 $14.94SFR 426-104-021 $14.94SFR 426-104-023 $14.94SFR 426-104-025 $14.94SFR 426-104-026 $14.94SFR 426-104-027 $14.94SFR 426-104-028 $14.94SFR 426-111-001 $14.94SFR 426-111-002 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-112-001 $14.94SFR 426-112-002 $14.94SFR 426-112-003 $14.94SFR 426-112-004 $14.94SFR 426-113-001 $14.94SFR 426-113-002 $14.94SFR 426-113-003 $14.94SFR 426-113-004 $14.94SFR 426-113-005 $14.94SFR 426-113-006 $14.94SFR 426-113-007 $14.94SFR 426-113-008 $14.94SFR 426-113-009 $14.94SFR 426-113-010 $14.94SFR 426-113-011 $14.94SFR 426-113-014 $14.94SFR 426-113-015 $14.94SFR 426-113-017 $14.94SFR 426-113-018 $14.94SFR 426-113-019 $14.94SFR 426-113-020 $14.94SFR 426-113-021 $14.94SFR 426-113-023 $14.94SFR 426-113-024 $14.94SFR 426-113-025 $14.94SFR 426-113-026 $14.94SFR 426-114-001 $14.94SFR 426-114-002 $14.94SFR 426-114-003 $14.94SFR 426-114-004 $14.94SFR 426-114-005 $14.94SFR 426-114-006 $14.94SFR 426-114-007 $14.94SFR 426-114-008 $14.94SFR 426-114-009 $14.94SFR 426-114-010 $14.94SFR 426-114-011 $14.94SFR 426-114-012 $14.94SFR 426-114-013 $14.94SFR 426-114-014 $14.94SFR 426-114-015 $14.94SFR 426-114-016 $14.94SFR 426-114-017 $14.94SFR 426-114-018 $14.94SFR 426-114-019 $14.94SFR 426-114-020 $14.94SFR 426-114-021 $14.94SFR 426-114-022 $14.94SFR 426-114-023 $14.94SFR 426-114-024 $14.94SFR 426-114-025 $14.94SFR 426-114-026 $14.94SFR - 226 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-114-027 $14.94SFR 426-114-028 $14.94SFR 426-114-029 $14.94SFR 426-115-001 $14.94SFR 426-115-002 $14.94SFR 426-115-003 $14.94SFR 426-115-004 $14.94SFR 426-115-005 $14.94SFR 426-115-006 $14.94SFR 426-115-007 $14.94SFR 426-115-008 $14.94SFR 426-115-009 $14.94SFR 426-115-010 $14.94SFR 426-115-011 $14.94SFR 426-115-012 $14.94SFR 426-115-013 $14.94SFR 426-115-014 $14.94SFR 426-115-015 $14.94SFR 426-115-016 $14.94SFR 426-116-001 $14.94SFR 426-116-002 $14.94SFR 426-116-003 $14.94SFR 426-116-004 $14.94SFR 426-116-005 $14.94SFR 426-116-006 $14.94SFR 426-116-007 $14.94SFR 426-121-001 $14.94SFR 426-121-002 $14.94SFR 426-121-003 $14.94SFR 426-121-004 $14.94SFR 426-121-005 $14.94SFR 426-121-006 $14.94SFR 426-121-007 $14.94SFR 426-121-008 $14.94SFR 426-121-010 $14.94SFR 426-121-011 $14.94SFR 426-121-012 $14.94SFR 426-121-013 $14.94SFR 426-121-014 $14.94SFR 426-121-015 $14.94SFR 426-121-016 $14.94SFR 426-121-017 $14.94SFR 426-121-018 $14.94SFR 426-121-019 $14.94SFR 426-121-020 $14.94SFR 426-121-021 $14.94SFR 426-121-022 $29.88MFR2 426-121-023 $14.94SFR 426-122-001 $14.94SFR 426-122-002 $14.94SFR 426-122-003 $14.94SFR 426-122-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-122-005 $14.94SFR 426-122-006 $14.94SFR 426-122-007 $14.94SFR 426-122-008 $14.94SFR 426-122-009 $14.94SFR 426-122-010 $14.94SFR 426-122-011 $14.94SFR 426-122-012 $14.94SFR 426-122-013 $14.94SFR 426-122-014 $14.94SFR 426-122-015 $14.94SFR 426-122-016 $14.94SFR 426-122-017 $14.94SFR 426-122-018 $14.94SFR 426-122-019 $14.94SFR 426-122-020 $14.94SFR 426-122-021 $14.94SFR 426-122-022 $14.94SFR 426-122-023 $14.94SFR 426-122-024 $14.94SFR 426-122-025 $14.94SFR 426-122-026 $14.94SFR 426-122-027 $14.94SFR 426-131-001 $14.94SFR 426-131-002 $14.94SFR 426-131-003 $14.94SFR 426-131-004 $14.94SFR 426-131-005 $14.94SFR 426-131-006 $14.94SFR 426-131-007 $14.94SFR 426-131-008 $14.94SFR 426-131-009 $14.94SFR 426-131-012 $14.94SFR 426-131-018 $14.94SFR 426-131-019 $14.94SFR 426-131-020 $14.94SFR 426-132-001 $14.94SFR 426-132-002 $14.94SFR 426-132-003 $14.94SFR 426-132-004 $14.94SFR 426-132-005 $14.94SFR 426-132-006 $14.94SFR 426-132-007 $14.94SFR 426-132-008 $14.94SFR 426-133-001 $14.94SFR 426-133-002 $14.94SFR 426-133-003 $14.94SFR 426-133-004 $14.94SFR 426-133-005 $14.94SFR 426-133-006 $14.94SFR 426-133-007 $14.94SFR 426-133-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-133-009 $14.94SFR 426-133-010 $14.94SFR 426-133-011 $14.94SFR 426-133-012 $14.94SFR 426-133-013 $14.94SFR 426-133-014 $14.94SFR 426-133-015 $14.94SFR 426-133-016 $14.94SFR 426-133-017 $14.94SFR 426-133-018 $14.94SFR 426-133-019 $14.94SFR 426-133-020 $14.94SFR 426-133-021 $14.94SFR 426-133-022 $14.94SFR 426-133-023 $14.94SFR 426-133-024 $14.94SFR 426-133-025 $14.94SFR 426-133-026 $14.94SFR 426-133-027 $14.94SFR 426-133-028 $14.94SFR 426-141-001 $14.94SFR 426-141-002 $14.94SFR 426-141-003 $14.94SFR 426-141-004 $14.94SFR 426-141-005 $14.94SFR 426-142-001 $14.94SFR 426-142-002 $14.94SFR 426-142-003 $14.94SFR 426-142-004 $14.94SFR 426-142-005 $14.94SFR 426-143-001 $14.94SFR 426-143-002 $14.94SFR 426-143-003 $14.94SFR 426-143-004 $14.94SFR 426-143-005 $14.94SFR 426-143-006 $14.94SFR 426-143-007 $14.94SFR 426-143-008 $14.94SFR 426-143-009 $14.94SFR 426-143-011 $14.94SFR 426-143-012 $14.94SFR 426-143-013 $14.94SFR 426-143-014 $14.94SFR 426-143-015 $14.94SFR 426-143-016 $14.94SFR 426-143-017 $14.94SFR 426-143-018 $14.94SFR 426-143-019 $14.94SFR 426-143-020 $14.94SFR 426-143-021 $14.94SFR 426-143-022 $14.94SFR 426-143-023 $14.94SFR - 227 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-143-024 $14.94SFR 426-143-025 $14.94SFR 426-143-026 $14.94SFR 426-143-027 $14.94SFR 426-143-028 $14.94SFR 426-143-029 $14.94SFR 426-143-030 $14.94SFR 426-143-031 $14.94SFR 426-143-032 $14.94SFR 426-143-033 $14.94SFR 426-143-034 $29.88MFR2 426-143-035 $14.94SFR 426-143-036 $14.94SFR 426-143-039 $14.94SFR 426-151-001 $14.94SFR 426-151-002 $14.94SFR 426-151-003 $14.94SFR 426-151-004 $14.94SFR 426-151-005 $14.94SFR 426-151-006 $14.94SFR 426-151-007 $14.94SFR 426-151-008 $14.94SFR 426-151-009 $14.94SFR 426-151-010 $14.94SFR 426-151-011 $14.94SFR 426-151-012 $14.94SFR 426-151-013 $14.94SFR 426-151-014 $14.94SFR 426-152-001 $14.94SFR 426-152-002 $14.94SFR 426-152-003 $14.94SFR 426-152-004 $14.94SFR 426-152-005 $14.94SFR 426-152-006 $14.94SFR 426-152-007 $14.94SFR 426-152-008 $14.94SFR 426-152-009 $14.94SFR 426-152-010 $14.94SFR 426-152-011 $14.94SFR 426-152-012 $14.94SFR 426-152-013 $14.94SFR 426-152-014 $14.94SFR 426-152-015 $14.94SFR 426-152-016 $14.94SFR 426-152-017 $14.94SFR 426-152-018 $14.94SFR 426-152-019 $14.94SFR 426-153-001 $14.94SFR 426-153-002 $14.94SFR 426-153-003 $14.94SFR 426-153-004 $14.94SFR 426-153-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-153-006 $14.94SFR 426-153-007 $14.94SFR 426-153-008 $14.94SFR 426-153-009 $14.94SFR 426-153-010 $14.94SFR 426-161-001 $74.70COM 426-161-002 $14.94SFR 426-161-003 $14.94SFR 426-161-004 $14.94SFR 426-161-005 $14.94SFR 426-161-006 $14.94SFR 426-161-007 $14.94SFR 426-161-008 $14.94SFR 426-161-011 $14.94SFR 426-161-012 $14.94SFR 426-161-013 $14.94SFR 426-161-014 $14.94SFR 426-161-017 $14.94SFR 426-161-018 $14.94SFR 426-161-019 $14.94SFR 426-161-020 $14.94SFR 426-161-021 $14.94SFR 426-161-022 $14.94SFR 426-161-023 $14.94SFR 426-162-001 $14.94SFR 426-162-002 $14.94SFR 426-162-003 $14.94SFR 426-162-004 $14.94SFR 426-162-005 $14.94SFR 426-162-006 $14.94SFR 426-162-007 $14.94SFR 426-162-008 $14.94SFR 426-162-009 $14.94SFR 426-162-010 $14.94SFR 426-162-011 $14.94SFR 426-162-012 $14.94SFR 426-162-013 $14.94SFR 426-162-014 $14.94SFR 426-162-015 $14.94SFR 426-162-016 $14.94SFR 426-162-017 $14.94SFR 426-162-018 $14.94SFR 426-162-019 $14.94SFR 426-163-001 $14.94SFR 426-163-002 $14.94SFR 426-163-003 $14.94SFR 426-163-004 $14.94SFR 426-163-005 $14.94SFR 426-163-006 $14.94SFR 426-163-007 $14.94SFR 426-163-010 $14.94SFR 426-163-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-163-012 $14.94SFR 426-163-013 $14.94SFR 426-163-014 $14.94SFR 426-163-015 $14.94SFR 426-163-016 $14.94SFR 426-163-017 $14.94SFR 426-163-018 $14.94SFR 426-163-019 $14.94SFR 426-163-020 $14.94SFR 426-163-021 $14.94SFR 426-163-022 $14.94SFR 426-163-023 $14.94SFR 426-163-024 $14.94SFR 426-163-025 $14.94SFR 426-163-026 $14.94SFR 426-163-027 $14.94SFR 426-163-028 $14.94SFR 426-163-029 $14.94SFR 426-163-030 $14.94SFR 426-163-031 $14.94SFR 426-163-032 $14.94SFR 426-163-038 $14.94SFR 426-163-039 $14.94SFR 426-163-040 $14.94SFR 426-163-043 $14.94SFR 426-163-044 $7.46VSFR 426-163-047 $14.94SFR 426-163-048 $14.94SFR 426-163-049 $14.94SFR 426-163-050 $14.94SFR 426-163-052 $7.46VSFR 426-163-053 $14.94SFR 426-163-054 $14.94SFR 426-171-001 $14.94SFR 426-171-002 $14.94SFR 426-171-003 $14.94SFR 426-171-004 $14.94SFR 426-171-005 $14.94SFR 426-171-006 $14.94SFR 426-171-009 $14.94SFR 426-171-010 $14.94SFR 426-171-011 $14.94SFR 426-171-012 $14.94SFR 426-171-013 $14.94SFR 426-171-014 $29.88MFR2 426-172-001 $14.94SFR 426-172-002 $14.94SFR 426-172-004 $14.94SFR 426-172-005 $14.94SFR 426-172-006 $14.94SFR 426-172-007 $14.94SFR 426-172-008 $14.94SFR - 228 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-172-010 $14.94SFR 426-172-011 $14.94SFR 426-172-013 $14.94SFR 426-172-014 $14.94SFR 426-172-016 $14.94SFR 426-172-017 $14.94SFR 426-172-019 $14.94SFR 426-172-020 $14.94SFR 426-172-021 $14.94SFR 426-172-022 $14.94SFR 426-173-002 $14.94SFR 426-173-003 $14.94SFR 426-173-004 $14.94SFR 426-173-005 $14.94SFR 426-173-006 $14.94SFR 426-173-007 $14.94SFR 426-173-008 $14.94SFR 426-173-009 $14.94SFR 426-173-010 $14.94SFR 426-173-011 $14.94SFR 426-173-013 $14.94SFR 426-173-014 $14.94SFR 426-173-015 $14.94SFR 426-173-016 $14.94SFR 426-173-017 $14.94SFR 426-173-018 $14.94SFR 426-173-019 $14.94SFR 426-173-020 $14.94SFR 426-173-021 $14.94SFR 426-173-022 $14.94SFR 426-173-023 $14.94SFR 426-173-024 $14.94SFR 426-173-025 $14.94SFR 426-173-026 $14.94SFR 426-173-027 $14.94SFR 426-173-028 $14.94SFR 426-173-029 $14.94SFR 426-173-030 $14.94SFR 426-181-001 $14.94SFR 426-181-002 $14.94SFR 426-181-003 $14.94SFR 426-181-004 $14.94SFR 426-181-005 $14.94SFR 426-181-006 $14.94SFR 426-181-007 $14.94SFR 426-181-008 $14.94SFR 426-181-009 $14.94SFR 426-181-010 $14.94SFR 426-181-011 $14.94SFR 426-181-012 $14.94SFR 426-181-014 $14.94SFR 426-181-015 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-181-016 $14.94SFR 426-181-017 $14.94SFR 426-181-018 $14.94SFR 426-181-019 $14.94SFR 426-181-020 $14.94SFR 426-181-021 $14.94SFR 426-181-022 $14.94SFR 426-181-023 $14.94SFR 426-181-024 $29.88MFR2 426-181-025 $14.94SFR 426-181-026 $14.94SFR 426-181-027 $14.94SFR 426-181-028 $14.94SFR 426-182-001 $7.46VSFR 426-182-002 $14.94SFR 426-182-003 $14.94SFR 426-182-004 $14.94SFR 426-182-005 $14.94SFR 426-182-006 $14.94SFR 426-182-007 $14.94SFR 426-182-008 $14.94SFR 426-182-009 $14.94SFR 426-182-011 $14.94SFR 426-182-012 $14.94SFR 426-182-013 $14.94SFR 426-182-014 $14.94SFR 426-182-016 $14.94SFR 426-182-017 $7.46VSFR 426-191-003 $14.94SFR 426-192-003 $14.94SFR 426-192-004 $14.94SFR 426-192-005 $7.46VSFR 426-192-006 $14.94SFR 426-192-007 $7.46VSFR 426-192-008 $7.46VSFR 426-200-001 $14.94SFR 426-200-002 $14.94SFR 426-200-003 $14.94SFR 426-200-004 $14.94SFR 426-200-005 $14.94SFR 426-200-006 $14.94SFR 426-200-007 $14.94SFR 426-200-008 $7.46VSFR 426-200-009 $14.94SFR 426-200-011 $7.46VSFR 426-200-012 $14.94SFR 426-200-013 $14.94SFR 426-200-014 $14.94SFR 426-200-015 $14.94SFR 426-200-016 $14.94SFR 426-200-017 $14.94SFR 426-200-018 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-200-019 $14.94SFR 426-200-020 $14.94SFR 426-200-021 $14.94SFR 426-200-022 $14.94SFR 426-200-023 $14.94SFR 426-210-002 $14.94SFR 426-210-003 $14.94SFR 426-210-006 $29.88MFR2 426-210-007 $7.46VSFR 426-210-008 $14.94SFR 426-210-010 $14.94SFR 426-210-011 $14.94SFR 426-210-012 $14.94SFR 426-210-015 $14.94SFR 426-210-016 $7.46VSFR 426-210-017 $7.46VSFR 426-210-018 $7.46VSFR 426-210-019 $7.46VSFR 426-210-020 $7.46VSFR 426-210-021 $14.94SFR 426-221-003 $14.94SFR 426-221-004 $14.94SFR 426-221-005 $14.94SFR 426-221-006 $14.94SFR 426-221-007 $14.94SFR 426-221-008 $14.94SFR 426-221-009 $14.94SFR 426-221-010 $14.94SFR 426-221-011 $14.94SFR 426-221-012 $14.94SFR 426-221-013 $14.94SFR 426-221-014 $14.94SFR 426-221-015 $14.94SFR 426-221-017 $14.94SFR 426-221-018 $14.94SFR 426-221-019 $14.94SFR 426-221-020 $14.94SFR 426-221-021 $14.94SFR 426-221-022 $14.94SFR 426-221-023 $14.94SFR 426-221-024 $14.94SFR 426-221-025 $14.94SFR 426-221-026 $14.94SFR 426-221-027 $14.94SFR 426-221-028 $14.94SFR 426-221-029 $14.94SFR 426-221-032 $14.94SFR 426-221-033 $14.94SFR 426-221-034 $14.94SFR 426-221-035 $14.94SFR 426-221-036 $14.94SFR 426-221-037 $14.94SFR - 229 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-221-038 $14.94SFR 426-221-039 $14.94SFR 426-221-040 $14.94SFR 426-221-041 $14.94SFR 426-221-042 $14.94SFR 426-221-043 $14.94SFR 426-221-044 $14.94SFR 426-221-045 $14.94SFR 426-221-046 $14.94SFR 426-221-047 $14.94SFR 426-221-048 $14.94SFR 426-221-051 $14.94SFR 426-221-052 $14.94SFR 426-221-053 $14.94SFR 426-222-001 $14.94SFR 426-222-002 $14.94SFR 426-222-003 $14.94SFR 426-222-006 $14.94SFR 426-222-007 $14.94SFR 426-222-008 $14.94SFR 426-222-009 $14.94SFR 426-222-010 $14.94SFR 426-222-012 $14.94SFR 426-222-013 $14.94SFR 426-222-015 $14.94SFR 426-222-016 $14.94SFR 426-230-001 $14.94SFR 426-230-002 $14.94SFR 426-230-003 $14.94SFR 426-230-004 $14.94SFR 426-230-005 $14.94SFR 426-230-006 $14.94SFR 426-230-007 $14.94SFR 426-230-008 $14.94SFR 426-230-009 $14.94SFR 426-230-010 $14.94SFR 426-230-011 $14.94SFR 426-230-012 $14.94SFR 426-230-013 $14.94SFR 426-230-014 $14.94SFR 426-230-015 $14.94SFR 426-230-016 $14.94SFR 426-230-017 $14.94SFR 426-230-018 $14.94SFR 426-230-019 $14.94SFR 426-230-020 $14.94SFR 426-230-021 $14.94SFR 426-230-022 $14.94SFR 426-230-023 $14.94SFR 426-230-024 $14.94SFR 426-230-025 $14.94SFR 426-230-026 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-230-029 $14.94SFR 426-230-030 $14.94SFR 426-230-031 $14.94SFR 426-230-036 $14.94SFR 426-230-037 $14.94SFR 426-230-038 $14.94SFR 426-230-039 $14.94SFR 426-230-040 $14.94SFR 426-230-041 $14.94SFR 426-230-046 $14.94SFR 426-230-047 $14.94SFR 426-230-048 $14.94SFR 426-230-051 $14.94SFR 426-230-052 $14.94SFR 426-230-053 $14.94SFR 426-241-001 $14.94SFR 426-241-002 $14.94SFR 426-241-003 $14.94SFR 426-241-004 $14.94SFR 426-241-005 $14.94SFR 426-241-007 $14.94SFR 426-241-008 $14.94SFR 426-241-010 $14.94SFR 426-241-011 $14.94SFR 426-242-004 $14.94SFR 426-242-005 $14.94SFR 426-242-007 $14.94SFR 426-242-008 $14.94SFR 426-242-009 $14.94SFR 426-243-001 $14.94SFR 426-243-002 $14.94SFR 426-243-003 $14.94SFR 426-243-004 $14.94SFR 426-243-005 $7.46VSFR 426-243-008 $14.94SFR 426-243-011 $14.94SFR 426-243-014 $14.94SFR 426-243-015 $14.94SFR 426-243-016 $14.94SFR 426-243-017 $14.94SFR 426-243-018 $14.94SFR 426-243-019 $7.46VSFR 426-243-021 $14.94SFR 426-243-022 $14.94SFR 426-243-023 $14.94SFR 426-243-025 $14.94SFR 426-243-026 $14.94SFR 426-243-028 $14.94SFR 426-243-035 $14.94SFR 426-243-037 $14.94SFR 426-243-039 $7.46VSFR 426-243-040 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-243-041 $14.94SFR 426-243-042 $7.46VSFR 426-243-043 $7.46VSFR 426-243-044 $14.94SFR 426-243-045 $7.46VSFR 426-243-046 $14.94SFR 426-250-001 $14.94SFR 426-250-002 $14.94SFR 426-250-003 $14.94SFR 426-250-004 $14.94SFR 426-250-005 $14.94SFR 426-250-006 $14.94SFR 426-250-007 $14.94SFR 426-250-008 $14.94SFR 426-250-009 $14.94SFR 426-250-010 $14.94SFR 426-250-011 $14.94SFR 426-250-012 $14.94SFR 426-250-017 $14.94SFR 426-250-018 $14.94SFR 426-250-022 $14.94SFR 426-250-023 $14.94SFR 426-250-024 $14.94SFR 426-250-025 $14.94SFR 426-250-026 $14.94SFR 426-250-027 $14.94SFR 426-250-032 $14.94SFR 426-250-033 $14.94SFR 426-250-036 $14.94SFR 426-250-037 $14.94SFR 426-250-038 $14.94SFR 426-250-039 $14.94SFR 426-250-040 $14.94SFR 426-250-041 $14.94SFR 426-250-042 $14.94SFR 426-250-044 $14.94SFR 426-250-045 $14.94SFR 426-250-048 $14.94SFR 426-250-049 $14.94SFR 426-250-050 $14.94SFR 426-250-051 $14.94SFR 426-250-052 $14.94SFR 426-250-053 $14.94SFR 426-250-054 $14.94SFR 426-250-055 $14.94SFR 426-250-056 $14.94SFR 426-250-057 $14.94SFR 426-250-061 $14.94SFR 426-250-062 $14.94SFR 426-250-063 $14.94SFR 426-250-064 $14.94SFR 426-261-005 $59.76MFR4 - 230 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-261-006 $74.70COM 426-261-009 $14.94SFR 426-261-013 $14.94SFR 426-261-014 $14.94SFR 426-261-016 $14.94SFR 426-261-017 $14.94SFR 426-261-019 $14.94SFR 426-261-020 $14.94SFR 426-261-021 $74.70COM 426-261-022 $14.94SFR 426-261-026 $74.70COM 426-261-027 $14.94SFR 426-261-028 $14.94SFR 426-261-029 $14.94SFR 426-261-031 $14.94SFR 426-261-037 $14.94SFR 426-261-038 $14.94SFR 426-261-039 $14.94SFR 426-261-044 $74.70COM 426-261-045 $14.94SFR 426-261-046 $14.94SFR 426-261-047 $14.94SFR 426-261-048 $14.94SFR 426-261-049 $14.94SFR 426-261-050 $7.46VCOM 426-261-054 $74.70COM 426-261-055 $74.70COM 426-261-056 $74.70COM 426-261-057 $74.70COM 426-261-058 $74.70COM 426-261-059 $74.70COM 426-261-060 $74.70COM 426-262-002 $14.94SFR 426-262-003 $14.94SFR 426-262-004 $14.94SFR 426-262-005 $14.94SFR 426-262-006 $14.94SFR 426-262-008 $14.94SFR 426-262-012 $14.94SFR 426-262-013 $14.94SFR 426-262-014 $14.94SFR 426-262-016 $29.88MFR2 426-262-017 $44.82MFR 426-270-013 $7.46VSFR 426-270-014 $14.94SFR 426-270-021 $74.70COM 426-270-022 $74.70COM 426-270-026 $74.70MFR5 426-270-027 $14.94SFR 426-270-028 $74.70COM 426-270-030 $74.70MFR5 426-270-033 $74.70COM Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-270-034 $14.94SFR 426-270-035 $74.70COM 426-270-036 $14.94SFR 426-270-037 $14.94SFR 426-270-038 $14.94SFR 426-270-039 $14.94SFR 426-270-040 $14.94SFR 426-270-041 $14.94SFR 426-270-042 $14.94SFR 426-270-043 $14.94SFR 426-270-044 $14.94SFR 426-270-045 $14.94SFR 426-420-005 $7.46CONDO 426-420-006 $7.46CONDO 426-420-007 $7.46CONDO 426-420-008 $7.46CONDO 426-420-009 $7.46CONDO 426-420-010 $7.46CONDO 426-420-011 $7.46CONDO 426-420-012 $7.46CONDO 426-420-013 $7.46CONDO 426-420-014 $7.46CONDO 426-420-015 $7.46CONDO 426-420-016 $7.46CONDO 426-420-017 $7.46CONDO 426-420-018 $7.46CONDO 426-420-019 $7.46CONDO 426-420-020 $7.46CONDO 426-420-021 $7.46CONDO 426-420-022 $7.46CONDO 426-420-023 $7.46CONDO 426-420-024 $7.46CONDO 426-420-025 $7.46CONDO 426-420-026 $7.46CONDO 426-420-027 $7.46CONDO 426-420-028 $7.46CONDO 426-420-029 $7.46CONDO 426-420-030 $7.46CONDO 426-420-031 $7.46CONDO 426-420-032 $7.46CONDO 426-420-033 $7.46CONDO 426-420-034 $7.46CONDO 426-420-035 $7.46CONDO 426-420-036 $7.46CONDO 426-420-037 $7.46CONDO 426-420-038 $7.46CONDO 426-420-039 $7.46CONDO 426-420-040 $7.46CONDO 426-420-041 $7.46CONDO 426-420-042 $7.46CONDO 426-420-043 $7.46CONDO 426-420-044 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 426-420-045 $7.46CONDO 426-420-046 $7.46CONDO 426-420-047 $7.46CONDO 426-420-048 $7.46CONDO 426-420-049 $7.46CONDO 426-420-050 $7.46CONDO 426-420-051 $7.46CONDO 426-420-052 $7.46CONDO 426-420-053 $7.46CONDO 426-420-054 $7.46CONDO 426-420-055 $7.46CONDO 426-420-056 $7.46CONDO 426-420-057 $7.46CONDO 426-420-058 $7.46CONDO 426-420-059 $7.46CONDO 426-420-060 $7.46CONDO 426-420-061 $7.46CONDO 426-420-062 $7.46CONDO 426-420-063 $7.46CONDO 426-420-064 $7.46CONDO 426-420-065 $7.46CONDO 426-420-066 $7.46CONDO 426-420-067 $7.46CONDO 426-420-068 $7.46CONDO 426-420-069 $7.46CONDO 426-420-070 $7.46CONDO 426-420-071 $7.46CONDO 426-420-072 $7.46CONDO 426-420-073 $7.46CONDO 426-420-074 $7.46CONDO 426-420-075 $7.46CONDO 426-420-076 $7.46CONDO 430-011-008 $14.94SFR 430-011-009 $14.94SFR 430-011-010 $14.94SFR 430-012-004 $14.94SFR 430-012-022 $7.46VSFR 430-012-023 $14.94SFR 430-012-024 $7.46VSFR 430-012-025 $14.94SFR 430-012-026 $14.94SFR 430-012-027 $14.94SFR 430-013-001 $14.94SFR 430-013-002 $14.94SFR 430-121-002 $14.94SFR 430-121-003 $14.94SFR 430-121-014 $14.94SFR 430-121-015 $14.94SFR 430-121-016 $14.94SFR 430-121-017 $7.46VSFR 430-122-017 $14.94SFR 430-131-001 $14.94SFR - 231 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 430-131-002 $14.94SFR 430-132-001 $14.94SFR 430-132-002 $7.46VSFR 430-132-003 $29.88MFR2 430-132-004 $14.94SFR 430-132-005 $14.94SFR 430-132-006 $14.94SFR 430-132-007 $14.94SFR 430-132-008 $14.94SFR 430-132-010 $14.94SFR 430-132-013 $14.94SFR 430-132-014 $14.94SFR 430-132-017 $14.94SFR 430-132-018 $14.94SFR 430-132-019 $14.94SFR 430-132-022 $14.94SFR 430-132-023 $14.94SFR 430-132-024 $14.94SFR 430-132-025 $14.94SFR 430-132-026 $14.94SFR 430-132-030 $14.94SFR 430-132-031 $14.94SFR 430-132-032 $14.94SFR 430-132-035 $14.94SFR 430-132-036 $14.94SFR 430-132-037 $14.94SFR 430-132-038 $14.94SFR 430-132-039 $14.94SFR 430-132-040 $14.94SFR 430-132-042 $14.94SFR 430-132-043 $14.94SFR 430-132-044 $14.94SFR 430-140-007 $14.94SFR 430-140-008 $14.94SFR 430-140-009 $14.94SFR 430-140-016 $14.94SFR 430-140-026 $74.70COM 430-140-027 $74.70COM 430-140-042 $14.94SFR 430-140-043 $14.94SFR 430-140-044 $14.94SFR 430-140-045 $14.94SFR 430-140-047 $14.94SFR 430-140-048 $14.94SFR 430-140-049 $14.94SFR 430-140-050 $14.94SFR 430-140-051 $14.94SFR 430-140-052 $14.94SFR 430-140-053 $74.70COM 430-151-001 $14.94SFR 430-151-002 $14.94SFR 430-151-004 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 430-151-005 $14.94SFR 430-151-006 $14.94SFR 430-152-001 $14.94SFR 430-152-002 $14.94SFR 430-152-003 $14.94SFR 430-152-006 $29.88MFR2 430-152-007 $14.94SFR 430-152-008 $14.94SFR 430-152-010 $14.94SFR 430-152-011 $14.94SFR 430-152-012 $14.94SFR 430-152-019 $14.94SFR 430-152-020 $14.94SFR 430-152-022 $14.94SFR 430-152-024 $14.94SFR 430-152-025 $74.70MFR5 430-152-026 $14.94SFR 430-152-027 $14.94SFR 430-152-028 $29.88MFR2 430-152-029 $29.88MFR2 430-152-030 $29.88MFR2 430-152-038 $29.88MFR2 430-152-041 $29.88MFR2 430-152-042 $14.94SFR 430-152-047 $74.70INST 430-152-049 $14.94SFR 430-152-053 $74.70COM 430-152-054 $74.70MFR5 430-152-059 $14.94SFR 430-152-060 $14.94SFR 430-152-062 $7.46VCOM 430-152-067 $74.70COM 430-152-068 $74.70COM 430-152-069 $14.94SFR 430-152-070 $14.94SFR 430-152-071 $14.94SFR 430-152-072 $14.94SFR 430-152-073 $14.94SFR 430-152-074 $14.94SFR 430-152-075 $14.94SFR 430-152-076 $14.94SFR 430-152-077 $14.94SFR 430-152-078 $14.94SFR 430-152-079 $14.94SFR 430-152-080 $14.94SFR 430-152-081 $14.94SFR 430-152-082 $14.94SFR 430-152-083 $14.94SFR 430-152-084 $14.94SFR 430-152-085 $14.94SFR 430-152-086 $14.94SFR 430-152-087 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 430-152-088 $14.94SFR 430-152-089 $14.94SFR 430-152-090 $14.94SFR 430-152-092 $7.46VSFR 430-152-093 $7.46VSFR 430-152-094 $7.46VMFR 430-152-095 $29.88MFR2 430-161-001 $14.94SFR 430-161-004 $7.46VSFR 430-161-006 $14.94SFR 430-161-007 $14.94SFR 430-161-008 $14.94SFR 430-161-009 $14.94SFR 430-161-010 $14.94SFR 430-161-011 $14.94SFR 430-161-012 $14.94SFR 430-161-013 $14.94SFR 430-161-014 $14.94SFR 430-161-015 $14.94SFR 430-161-016 $14.94SFR 430-161-017 $14.94SFR 430-161-018 $14.94SFR 430-161-019 $14.94SFR 430-161-020 $7.46VSFR 430-161-021 $14.94SFR 430-162-001 $14.94SFR 430-162-002 $14.94SFR 430-162-003 $14.94SFR 430-162-004 $14.94SFR 430-162-005 $14.94SFR 430-162-006 $14.94SFR 430-162-007 $14.94SFR 430-170-007 $14.94SFR 430-170-008 $14.94SFR 430-170-010 $14.94SFR 430-170-011 $74.70INST 430-181-001 $14.94SFR 430-181-002 $14.94SFR 430-181-003 $14.94SFR 430-181-004 $14.94SFR 430-181-005 $14.94SFR 430-181-007 $14.94SFR 430-181-008 $14.94SFR 430-181-009 $14.94SFR 430-181-010 $14.94SFR 430-181-011 $14.94SFR 430-181-012 $14.94SFR 430-181-013 $14.94SFR 430-181-014 $14.94SFR 430-181-015 $14.94SFR 430-181-016 $14.94SFR 430-181-017 $14.94SFR - 232 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 430-181-018 $14.94SFR 430-181-019 $14.94SFR 430-181-021 $14.94SFR 430-181-022 $14.94SFR 430-181-024 $14.94SFR 430-181-025 $14.94SFR 430-181-026 $14.94SFR 430-181-027 $14.94SFR 430-181-028 $14.94SFR 430-181-029 $14.94SFR 430-181-030 $14.94SFR 430-181-031 $14.94SFR 430-181-032 $14.94SFR 430-181-033 $14.94SFR 430-181-034 $14.94SFR 430-181-035 $14.94SFR 430-181-036 $14.94SFR 430-182-001 $14.94SFR 430-182-002 $14.94SFR 430-182-003 $14.94SFR 430-182-004 $14.94SFR 430-183-001 $14.94SFR 430-183-002 $14.94SFR 430-183-005 $7.46VSFR 430-183-006 $14.94SFR 430-183-008 $14.94SFR 430-183-009 $14.94SFR 430-183-012 $14.94SFR 430-183-013 $14.94SFR 430-183-014 $14.94SFR 430-183-015 $14.94SFR 430-183-016 $14.94SFR 430-183-017 $14.94SFR 430-183-018 $14.94SFR 430-183-019 $14.94SFR 430-183-020 $14.94SFR 430-183-021 $14.94SFR 430-183-022 $14.94SFR 430-183-023 $14.94SFR 430-183-024 $7.46VSFR 430-183-026 $7.46VSFR 430-183-027 $14.94SFR 430-184-005 $14.94SFR 430-184-006 $14.94SFR 430-184-007 $14.94SFR 430-184-009 $14.94SFR 430-184-010 $14.94SFR 430-184-011 $14.94SFR 430-184-012 $14.94SFR 430-184-013 $14.94SFR 430-184-014 $14.94SFR 430-184-015 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 430-184-016 $14.94SFR 430-184-017 $14.94SFR 430-184-018 $14.94SFR 430-184-019 $14.94SFR 430-184-020 $14.94SFR 430-184-021 $7.46VSFR 430-190-001 $14.94SFR 430-190-004 $7.46VSFR 430-190-007 $14.94SFR 430-190-008 $14.94SFR 430-210-001 $7.46MISC 430-260-005 $14.94SFR 430-260-006 $7.46VSFR 430-280-001 $14.94SFR 430-280-002 $14.94SFR 430-280-004 $14.94SFR 430-280-005 $14.94SFR 430-280-006 $14.94SFR 430-280-007 $14.94SFR 430-280-014 $14.94SFR 430-280-015 $14.94SFR 430-280-020 $74.70INST 430-280-021 $7.46CONDO 430-280-022 $7.46CONDO 430-280-023 $7.46CONDO 430-280-024 $7.46CONDO 430-280-025 $7.46CONDO 430-280-026 $7.46CONDO 430-280-027 $7.46CONDO 430-280-028 $7.46CONDO 430-280-029 $7.46CONDO 430-280-030 $7.46CONDO 430-280-031 $7.46CONDO 430-280-032 $7.46CONDO 430-280-033 $7.46CONDO 430-280-034 $7.46CONDO 430-280-035 $7.46CONDO 430-280-036 $7.46CONDO 430-280-037 $7.46CONDO 430-280-038 $7.46CONDO 430-280-039 $7.46CONDO 430-280-040 $7.46CONDO 430-280-041 $7.46CONDO 430-280-042 $7.46CONDO 430-280-043 $7.46CONDO 430-280-044 $7.46CONDO 430-290-001 $74.70INST 430-290-004 $14.94SFR 430-290-035 $14.94SFR 430-401-001 $14.94SFR 430-401-002 $14.94SFR 430-401-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 430-401-004 $14.94SFR 430-401-005 $14.94SFR 430-401-006 $14.94SFR 430-401-007 $14.94SFR 430-401-008 $14.94SFR 430-401-009 $14.94SFR 430-401-010 $14.94SFR 430-401-011 $14.94SFR 430-401-012 $14.94SFR 430-401-013 $14.94SFR 430-401-014 $14.94SFR 430-401-015 $14.94SFR 430-401-016 $14.94SFR 430-401-017 $14.94SFR 430-401-020 $14.94SFR 430-402-001 $14.94SFR 430-402-002 $14.94SFR 430-402-003 $14.94SFR 430-402-004 $14.94SFR 430-402-005 $14.94SFR 430-402-006 $14.94SFR 430-402-007 $14.94SFR 430-402-008 $14.94SFR 430-402-009 $14.94SFR 430-402-010 $14.94SFR 430-402-011 $14.94SFR 430-402-012 $14.94SFR 430-402-013 $14.94SFR 430-402-014 $14.94SFR 430-402-015 $14.94SFR 430-402-017 $14.94SFR 430-402-018 $14.94SFR 430-402-019 $14.94SFR 430-402-020 $14.94SFR 430-402-022 $14.94SFR 430-402-023 $14.94SFR 430-402-025 $14.94SFR 430-402-026 $14.94SFR 430-402-027 $14.94SFR 430-402-028 $14.94SFR 430-402-029 $14.94SFR 430-500-001 $7.46CONDO 430-500-002 $7.46CONDO 430-500-003 $7.46CONDO 430-500-004 $7.46CONDO 430-500-005 $7.46CONDO 430-500-006 $7.46CONDO 430-500-007 $7.46CONDO 430-500-008 $7.46CONDO 430-500-009 $7.46CONDO 430-500-010 $7.46CONDO 430-500-011 $7.46CONDO - 233 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 430-500-012 $7.46CONDO 430-500-013 $7.46CONDO 430-500-014 $7.46CONDO 430-500-015 $7.46CONDO 430-500-016 $7.46CONDO 431-010-005 $104.58MFR7 431-010-006 $14.94SFR 431-010-007 $7.46VSFR 431-010-008 $14.94SFR 431-010-010 $14.94SFR 431-010-011 $14.94SFR 431-010-012 $14.94SFR 431-010-019 $14.94SFR 431-010-020 $14.94SFR 431-010-021 $14.94SFR 431-010-023 $14.94SFR 431-010-024 $14.94SFR 431-010-025 $14.94SFR 431-010-026 $14.94SFR 431-020-001 $14.94SFR 431-020-002 $14.94SFR 431-020-003 $14.94SFR 431-020-004 $14.94SFR 431-020-005 $14.94SFR 431-020-010 $14.94SFR 431-020-011 $14.94SFR 431-020-012 $14.94SFR 431-020-013 $14.94SFR 431-020-017 $7.46VMFR 431-040-013 $74.70COM 431-070-023 $74.70INST 431-070-026 $7.46VSFR 431-070-027 $7.46VSFR 431-070-028 $7.46VSFR 431-070-029 $14.94SFR 431-070-030 $14.94SFR 431-070-031 $14.94SFR 431-070-032 $14.94SFR 431-070-033 $14.94SFR 431-070-034 $14.94SFR 431-070-035 $7.46VSFR 431-070-036 $14.94SFR 431-070-037 $14.94SFR 431-070-038 $14.94SFR 431-070-039 $14.94SFR 431-070-040 $14.94SFR 431-070-041 $14.94SFR 431-081-005 $14.94SFR 431-081-006 $14.94SFR 431-081-007 $14.94SFR 431-081-008 $14.94SFR 431-081-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 431-081-012 $7.46VSFR 431-081-014 $14.94SFR 431-082-008 $14.94SFR 431-082-009 $14.94SFR 431-082-010 $14.94SFR 431-082-011 $14.94SFR 431-082-012 $14.94SFR 431-082-013 $14.94SFR 431-082-014 $14.94SFR 431-082-015 $14.94SFR 431-082-016 $14.94SFR 431-082-017 $14.94SFR 431-082-018 $14.94SFR 431-082-019 $14.94SFR 431-082-020 $14.94SFR 431-082-021 $14.94SFR 431-082-022 $14.94SFR 431-082-023 $14.94SFR 431-082-024 $14.94SFR 431-310-001 $7.46CONDO 431-310-002 $7.46CONDO 431-310-003 $7.46CONDO 431-310-004 $7.46CONDO 431-310-005 $7.46CONDO 431-310-006 $7.46CONDO 431-310-007 $7.46CONDO 431-310-008 $7.46CONDO 431-310-009 $7.46CONDO 431-310-010 $7.46CONDO 431-310-011 $7.46CONDO 431-310-012 $7.46CONDO 431-310-013 $7.46CONDO 431-310-014 $7.46CONDO 431-310-015 $7.46CONDO 431-310-016 $7.46CONDO 431-310-017 $7.46CONDO 431-310-018 $7.46CONDO 431-440-001 $7.46CONDO 431-440-002 $7.46CONDO 431-440-003 $7.46CONDO 431-440-004 $7.46CONDO 431-440-005 $7.46CONDO 431-440-006 $7.46CONDO 431-440-007 $7.46CONDO 431-440-008 $7.46CONDO 431-440-009 $7.46CONDO 431-440-010 $7.46CONDO 431-440-011 $7.46CONDO 431-440-012 $7.46CONDO 431-440-013 $7.46CONDO 431-440-014 $7.46CONDO 431-440-015 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 431-440-016 $7.46CONDO 431-440-018 $14.94SFR 433-010-035 $14.94SFR 433-010-036 $14.94SFR 433-020-056 $14.94SFR 433-020-057 $14.94SFR 433-020-058 $14.94SFR 433-020-059 $14.94SFR 433-020-060 $14.94SFR 433-020-061 $14.94SFR 433-020-062 $14.94SFR 433-020-063 $14.94SFR 433-020-064 $14.94SFR 433-020-065 $14.94SFR 433-103-023 $14.94SFR 433-103-024 $7.46VSFR 433-160-068 $14.94SFR 433-160-069 $14.94SFR 433-160-070 $14.94SFR 433-160-071 $14.94SFR 433-160-072 $14.94SFR 433-160-073 $14.94SFR 433-160-074 $14.94SFR 433-160-075 $14.94SFR 433-160-076 $14.94SFR 433-160-077 $14.94SFR 433-160-078 $14.94SFR 433-160-079 $14.94SFR 433-160-080 $14.94SFR 433-160-081 $14.94SFR 433-160-082 $14.94SFR 433-180-042 $14.94SFR 433-180-043 $14.94SFR 433-180-051 $14.94SFR 433-180-052 $14.94SFR 433-180-053 $14.94SFR 433-180-054 $14.94SFR 433-180-055 $14.94SFR 433-180-056 $14.94SFR 433-180-057 $14.94SFR 433-180-058 $14.94SFR 433-180-059 $14.94SFR 433-180-061 $14.94SFR 433-180-062 $14.94SFR 433-200-009 $14.94SFR 433-200-027 $14.94SFR 433-200-028 $7.46VSFR 433-200-029 $7.46VSFR 433-200-030 $7.46VSFR 433-200-031 $7.46VSFR 433-210-037 $14.94SFR 433-210-038 $14.94SFR - 234 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 433-210-039 $14.94SFR 433-210-040 $14.94SFR 433-210-041 $14.94SFR 433-210-042 $14.94SFR 433-210-043 $14.94SFR 433-210-044 $14.94SFR 433-210-045 $14.94SFR 433-220-010 $74.70COM 433-220-011 $74.70COM 433-220-012 $74.70COM 433-220-013 $74.70COM 433-220-015 $14.94SFR 433-220-016 $74.70COM 433-220-018 $14.94SFR 433-230-008 $104.58MFR7 433-230-009 $7.46VMFR 433-230-011 $59.76MFR4 433-230-014 $74.70COM 433-230-024 $14.94SFR 433-230-025 $14.94SFR 433-241-031 $14.94SFR 433-241-034 $14.94SFR 433-241-037 $14.94SFR 433-241-038 $14.94SFR 433-241-039 $14.94SFR 433-241-040 $14.94SFR 433-241-041 $14.94SFR 433-241-042 $14.94SFR 433-241-043 $14.94SFR 433-241-044 $14.94SFR 433-241-045 $14.94SFR 433-241-046 $14.94SFR 433-241-047 $14.94SFR 433-241-048 $14.94SFR 433-241-049 $14.94SFR 433-241-050 $14.94SFR 433-241-057 $7.46VSFR 433-241-058 $14.94SFR 433-241-059 $14.94SFR 433-241-060 $14.94SFR 433-242-004 $14.94SFR 433-242-009 $14.94SFR 433-261-014 $14.94SFR 433-261-015 $14.94SFR 433-261-016 $14.94SFR 433-261-017 $14.94SFR 433-261-018 $14.94SFR 433-261-019 $14.94SFR 433-261-020 $14.94SFR 433-261-021 $14.94SFR 433-261-022 $14.94SFR 433-261-023 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 433-261-024 $14.94SFR 433-262-001 $14.94SFR 433-262-003 $14.94SFR 433-262-004 $14.94SFR 433-262-005 $14.94SFR 433-262-006 $14.94SFR 433-262-007 $14.94SFR 433-262-008 $14.94SFR 433-270-002 $14.94SFR 433-270-003 $14.94SFR 433-270-004 $14.94SFR 433-270-006 $14.94SFR 433-270-008 $14.94SFR 433-270-009 $14.94SFR 433-270-010 $14.94SFR 433-270-011 $14.94SFR 433-270-014 $14.94SFR 433-270-015 $14.94SFR 433-270-016 $14.94SFR 433-270-017 $14.94SFR 433-270-020 $14.94SFR 433-270-021 $14.94SFR 433-270-025 $7.46VSFR 433-270-026 $14.94SFR 433-270-027 $7.46VSFR 433-270-029 $14.94SFR 433-270-030 $14.94SFR 433-270-031 $14.94SFR 433-270-032 $14.94SFR 433-270-033 $14.94SFR 433-270-034 $14.94SFR 433-270-035 $14.94SFR 433-270-036 $14.94SFR 433-321-001 $14.94SFR 433-321-002 $14.94SFR 433-321-003 $14.94SFR 433-322-001 $14.94SFR 433-322-002 $14.94SFR 433-322-003 $14.94SFR 433-322-004 $14.94SFR 433-322-005 $14.94SFR 433-322-006 $14.94SFR 433-322-007 $14.94SFR 433-323-001 $14.94SFR 433-323-002 $14.94SFR 433-323-003 $14.94SFR 433-460-001 $14.94SFR 433-460-002 $14.94SFR 433-460-004 $14.94SFR 433-460-005 $14.94SFR 433-460-006 $14.94SFR 433-460-007 $7.46VSFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 433-460-010 $14.94SFR 433-460-011 $14.94SFR 433-460-012 $14.94SFR 433-460-013 $14.94SFR 433-460-014 $14.94SFR 433-460-015 $14.94SFR 433-460-016 $14.94SFR 433-460-017 $14.94SFR 433-461-002 $14.94SFR 435-021-003 $14.94SFR 435-021-004 $74.70COM 435-022-001 $14.94SFR 435-022-002 $14.94SFR 435-022-003 $14.94SFR 435-022-004 $14.94SFR 435-022-005 $14.94SFR 435-022-006 $14.94SFR 435-022-007 $14.94SFR 435-022-008 $14.94SFR 435-023-001 $14.94SFR 435-023-002 $14.94SFR 435-023-003 $14.94SFR 435-023-004 $14.94SFR 435-023-005 $14.94SFR 435-023-006 $14.94SFR 435-023-007 $14.94SFR 435-023-008 $14.94SFR 435-023-009 $14.94SFR 435-023-010 $14.94SFR 435-023-011 $14.94SFR 435-023-012 $14.94SFR 435-024-008 $14.94SFR 435-024-013 $14.94SFR 435-024-014 $14.94SFR 435-024-015 $14.94SFR 435-024-017 $14.94SFR 435-024-018 $14.94SFR 435-024-019 $14.94SFR 435-024-020 $14.94SFR 435-024-021 $14.94SFR 435-024-022 $14.94SFR 435-024-023 $14.94SFR 435-024-024 $14.94SFR 435-024-025 $14.94SFR 435-024-026 $14.94SFR 435-024-028 $14.94SFR 435-024-029 $14.94SFR 435-024-030 $14.94SFR 435-024-031 $14.94SFR 435-024-035 $14.94SFR 435-025-001 $14.94SFR 435-025-002 $14.94SFR - 235 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-025-003 $14.94SFR 435-025-004 $14.94SFR 435-025-005 $14.94SFR 435-025-006 $14.94SFR 435-025-007 $14.94SFR 435-025-008 $14.94SFR 435-025-009 $14.94SFR 435-025-010 $14.94SFR 435-026-001 $14.94SFR 435-026-002 $14.94SFR 435-031-007 $14.94SFR 435-031-008 $14.94SFR 435-031-009 $14.94SFR 435-031-010 $14.94SFR 435-031-011 $14.94SFR 435-031-012 $14.94SFR 435-031-013 $14.94SFR 435-031-014 $14.94SFR 435-031-015 $14.94SFR 435-031-016 $14.94SFR 435-031-017 $14.94SFR 435-031-018 $14.94SFR 435-031-019 $14.94SFR 435-031-020 $14.94SFR 435-031-021 $14.94SFR 435-031-022 $14.94SFR 435-031-023 $14.94SFR 435-031-024 $14.94SFR 435-031-025 $14.94SFR 435-031-026 $14.94SFR 435-031-034 $104.58MFR7 435-031-037 $74.70MFR5 435-032-001 $14.94SFR 435-032-002 $14.94SFR 435-032-003 $14.94SFR 435-032-004 $14.94SFR 435-032-005 $14.94SFR 435-032-006 $14.94SFR 435-032-007 $14.94SFR 435-032-008 $14.94SFR 435-032-009 $14.94SFR 435-033-001 $14.94SFR 435-033-002 $14.94SFR 435-033-003 $14.94SFR 435-033-004 $14.94SFR 435-033-005 $14.94SFR 435-033-006 $14.94SFR 435-033-007 $14.94SFR 435-033-008 $14.94SFR 435-033-009 $14.94SFR 435-033-010 $14.94SFR 435-033-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-033-012 $14.94SFR 435-033-013 $14.94SFR 435-033-014 $14.94SFR 435-033-015 $14.94SFR 435-033-016 $14.94SFR 435-034-001 $14.94SFR 435-034-002 $14.94SFR 435-034-003 $14.94SFR 435-034-004 $14.94SFR 435-034-005 $14.94SFR 435-034-006 $14.94SFR 435-034-007 $14.94SFR 435-034-008 $14.94SFR 435-034-009 $14.94SFR 435-034-010 $14.94SFR 435-034-011 $14.94SFR 435-034-012 $14.94SFR 435-034-013 $14.94SFR 435-034-014 $14.94SFR 435-034-015 $14.94SFR 435-034-016 $14.94SFR 435-035-001 $14.94SFR 435-035-002 $14.94SFR 435-035-003 $14.94SFR 435-035-004 $14.94SFR 435-035-005 $14.94SFR 435-035-006 $14.94SFR 435-035-007 $14.94SFR 435-035-008 $14.94SFR 435-035-009 $14.94SFR 435-035-010 $14.94SFR 435-035-011 $14.94SFR 435-035-012 $14.94SFR 435-035-013 $14.94SFR 435-035-014 $14.94SFR 435-035-015 $14.94SFR 435-035-016 $14.94SFR 435-035-017 $14.94SFR 435-035-018 $14.94SFR 435-035-019 $14.94SFR 435-035-020 $14.94SFR 435-035-021 $14.94SFR 435-035-022 $14.94SFR 435-035-023 $14.94SFR 435-035-024 $14.94SFR 435-035-025 $14.94SFR 435-035-027 $29.88MFR2 435-035-028 $29.88MFR2 435-035-029 $29.88MFR2 435-035-030 $29.88MFR2 435-035-031 $29.88MFR2 435-035-032 $29.88MFR2 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-035-033 $29.88MFR2 435-035-034 $29.88MFR2 435-035-035 $29.88MFR2 435-041-001 $14.94SFR 435-041-002 $14.94SFR 435-041-003 $14.94SFR 435-041-004 $14.94SFR 435-041-005 $14.94SFR 435-041-006 $14.94SFR 435-041-007 $14.94SFR 435-041-008 $14.94SFR 435-041-009 $14.94SFR 435-041-010 $14.94SFR 435-041-011 $14.94SFR 435-041-012 $14.94SFR 435-041-013 $14.94SFR 435-041-014 $14.94SFR 435-041-015 $14.94SFR 435-041-016 $14.94SFR 435-041-017 $14.94SFR 435-041-018 $14.94SFR 435-041-019 $14.94SFR 435-041-020 $14.94SFR 435-041-021 $14.94SFR 435-041-022 $14.94SFR 435-041-023 $14.94SFR 435-041-024 $14.94SFR 435-042-001 $14.94SFR 435-042-002 $14.94SFR 435-042-003 $14.94SFR 435-042-004 $14.94SFR 435-042-005 $14.94SFR 435-042-006 $14.94SFR 435-042-007 $14.94SFR 435-042-008 $14.94SFR 435-042-009 $14.94SFR 435-042-010 $14.94SFR 435-042-011 $14.94SFR 435-042-012 $14.94SFR 435-042-013 $14.94SFR 435-042-014 $14.94SFR 435-042-015 $14.94SFR 435-042-016 $14.94SFR 435-042-017 $14.94SFR 435-042-018 $14.94SFR 435-042-019 $14.94SFR 435-042-020 $14.94SFR 435-042-021 $14.94SFR 435-042-022 $14.94SFR 435-042-023 $14.94SFR 435-042-024 $14.94SFR 435-052-002 $14.94SFR - 236 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-052-003 $14.94SFR 435-052-004 $14.94SFR 435-052-005 $14.94SFR 435-052-006 $14.94SFR 435-052-007 $14.94SFR 435-052-008 $14.94SFR 435-052-009 $14.94SFR 435-052-010 $14.94SFR 435-052-011 $14.94SFR 435-052-012 $14.94SFR 435-052-013 $14.94SFR 435-052-014 $14.94SFR 435-052-015 $14.94SFR 435-052-016 $14.94SFR 435-053-001 $14.94SFR 435-053-002 $14.94SFR 435-053-003 $14.94SFR 435-053-004 $14.94SFR 435-053-005 $14.94SFR 435-053-006 $14.94SFR 435-053-007 $14.94SFR 435-053-008 $14.94SFR 435-053-009 $14.94SFR 435-053-010 $14.94SFR 435-053-011 $14.94SFR 435-053-012 $14.94SFR 435-053-013 $14.94SFR 435-053-014 $14.94SFR 435-053-015 $14.94SFR 435-053-016 $14.94SFR 435-053-017 $14.94SFR 435-053-018 $14.94SFR 435-054-001 $14.94SFR 435-054-002 $14.94SFR 435-054-003 $14.94SFR 435-054-004 $14.94SFR 435-054-005 $14.94SFR 435-054-006 $14.94SFR 435-054-007 $14.94SFR 435-054-008 $14.94SFR 435-054-009 $14.94SFR 435-054-010 $14.94SFR 435-054-011 $14.94SFR 435-054-012 $14.94SFR 435-054-013 $14.94SFR 435-054-014 $14.94SFR 435-054-015 $14.94SFR 435-054-016 $14.94SFR 435-054-017 $14.94SFR 435-061-016 $14.94SFR 435-061-017 $14.94SFR 435-061-018 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-061-019 $14.94SFR 435-061-020 $14.94SFR 435-061-021 $14.94SFR 435-061-022 $14.94SFR 435-061-023 $14.94SFR 435-061-024 $14.94SFR 435-061-025 $14.94SFR 435-061-026 $14.94SFR 435-061-027 $14.94SFR 435-061-028 $14.94SFR 435-061-029 $14.94SFR 435-061-030 $14.94SFR 435-061-031 $14.94SFR 435-061-032 $14.94SFR 435-061-033 $14.94SFR 435-061-034 $14.94SFR 435-061-035 $14.94SFR 435-061-036 $14.94SFR 435-061-037 $14.94SFR 435-061-038 $14.94SFR 435-061-039 $14.94SFR 435-061-040 $14.94SFR 435-061-041 $14.94SFR 435-061-042 $14.94SFR 435-061-043 $14.94SFR 435-061-044 $14.94SFR 435-061-045 $14.94SFR 435-061-046 $14.94SFR 435-061-048 $14.94SFR 435-061-049 $14.94SFR 435-061-050 $14.94SFR 435-061-051 $14.94SFR 435-061-052 $14.94SFR 435-061-053 $14.94SFR 435-062-001 $14.94SFR 435-062-002 $14.94SFR 435-062-003 $14.94SFR 435-062-004 $14.94SFR 435-062-005 $14.94SFR 435-062-006 $14.94SFR 435-062-007 $14.94SFR 435-062-008 $14.94SFR 435-062-009 $14.94SFR 435-062-010 $14.94SFR 435-062-011 $14.94SFR 435-062-012 $14.94SFR 435-062-013 $14.94SFR 435-062-014 $14.94SFR 435-062-015 $14.94SFR 435-062-016 $14.94SFR 435-062-017 $7.46VSFR 435-063-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-063-002 $14.94SFR 435-063-003 $14.94SFR 435-063-004 $14.94SFR 435-063-005 $14.94SFR 435-063-006 $14.94SFR 435-063-007 $14.94SFR 435-063-011 $14.94SFR 435-063-012 $14.94SFR 435-063-013 $14.94SFR 435-063-014 $14.94SFR 435-063-015 $14.94SFR 435-063-016 $14.94SFR 435-063-017 $14.94SFR 435-063-018 $14.94SFR 435-063-020 $14.94SFR 435-063-024 $14.94SFR 435-063-025 $14.94SFR 435-064-001 $14.94SFR 435-064-005 $14.94SFR 435-064-006 $14.94SFR 435-064-007 $14.94SFR 435-064-008 $14.94SFR 435-064-009 $14.94SFR 435-064-010 $14.94SFR 435-064-011 $14.94SFR 435-064-014 $14.94SFR 435-064-015 $14.94SFR 435-070-004 $14.94SFR 435-070-006 $89.64MFR6 435-070-007 $44.82MFR 435-070-008 $7.46VSFR 435-070-009 $14.94SFR 435-070-010 $74.70MFR5 435-070-011 $44.82MFR 435-070-016 $14.94SFR 435-070-017 $74.70INST 435-070-019 $89.64MFR6 435-070-020 $74.70MFR5 435-070-021 $14.94SFR 435-070-022 $14.94SFR 435-070-024 $14.94SFR 435-070-025 $14.94SFR 435-070-026 $14.94SFR 435-070-027 $14.94SFR 435-070-028 $14.94SFR 435-070-029 $14.94SFR 435-070-030 $14.94SFR 435-070-031 $14.94SFR 435-070-032 $14.94SFR 435-070-033 $14.94SFR 435-070-034 $14.94SFR 435-070-035 $14.94SFR - 237 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-070-036 $14.94SFR 435-070-037 $14.94SFR 435-070-038 $14.94SFR 435-070-039 $14.94SFR 435-070-040 $14.94SFR 435-070-041 $14.94SFR 435-070-042 $14.94SFR 435-070-043 $14.94SFR 435-070-044 $14.94SFR 435-070-045 $14.94SFR 435-070-046 $14.94SFR 435-070-047 $14.94SFR 435-070-048 $14.94SFR 435-070-049 $14.94SFR 435-070-050 $14.94SFR 435-070-051 $14.94SFR 435-070-052 $14.94SFR 435-070-053 $14.94SFR 435-070-054 $14.94SFR 435-070-055 $14.94SFR 435-070-056 $14.94SFR 435-070-057 $14.94SFR 435-070-058 $14.94SFR 435-080-002 $104.58MFR7 435-080-004 $14.94SFR 435-080-005 $7.46VSFR 435-080-006 $14.94SFR 435-080-015 $74.70MFR5 435-080-018 $14.94SFR 435-080-019 $14.94SFR 435-080-020 $29.88MFR2 435-080-021 $59.76MFR4 435-080-022 $59.76MFR4 435-080-023 $59.76MFR4 435-080-024 $14.94SFR 435-080-025 $14.94SFR 435-090-001 $14.94SFR 435-090-002 $14.94SFR 435-090-003 $14.94SFR 435-090-004 $14.94SFR 435-090-007 $7.46VSFR 435-090-008 $14.94SFR 435-090-011 $14.94SFR 435-090-012 $14.94SFR 435-090-013 $14.94SFR 435-090-014 $14.94SFR 435-100-003 $74.70MFR5 435-100-013 $14.94SFR 435-100-017 $14.94SFR 435-100-018 $14.94SFR 435-100-019 $14.94SFR 435-100-020 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-100-021 $14.94SFR 435-100-022 $14.94SFR 435-100-023 $14.94SFR 435-100-027 $14.94SFR 435-100-028 $14.94SFR 435-100-029 $14.94SFR 435-100-030 $14.94SFR 435-100-031 $14.94SFR 435-100-032 $14.94SFR 435-100-033 $14.94SFR 435-100-034 $14.94SFR 435-100-035 $14.94SFR 435-100-036 $14.94SFR 435-100-037 $14.94SFR 435-100-038 $14.94SFR 435-100-039 $14.94SFR 435-100-043 $14.94SFR 435-100-044 $14.94SFR 435-100-045 $14.94SFR 435-100-047 $14.94SFR 435-100-048 $14.94SFR 435-100-049 $14.94SFR 435-110-003 $14.94SFR 435-110-004 $14.94SFR 435-110-005 $14.94SFR 435-110-006 $14.94SFR 435-110-007 $14.94SFR 435-110-008 $14.94SFR 435-110-009 $14.94SFR 435-110-010 $14.94SFR 435-110-012 $14.94SFR 435-110-013 $14.94SFR 435-110-014 $14.94SFR 435-110-022 $14.94SFR 435-110-024 $14.94SFR 435-110-029 $14.94SFR 435-120-040 $14.94SFR 435-120-041 $14.94SFR 435-120-042 $14.94SFR 435-120-043 $14.94SFR 435-120-044 $14.94SFR 435-120-045 $14.94SFR 435-120-046 $14.94SFR 435-120-047 $14.94SFR 435-120-048 $14.94SFR 435-120-049 $14.94SFR 435-120-050 $14.94SFR 435-120-051 $14.94SFR 435-120-052 $14.94SFR 435-120-053 $14.94SFR 435-120-054 $14.94SFR 435-120-055 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-120-056 $14.94SFR 435-120-057 $14.94SFR 435-120-058 $14.94SFR 435-120-062 $14.94SFR 435-120-063 $14.94SFR 435-120-069 $14.94SFR 435-120-070 $7.46VSFR 435-250-001 $7.46CONDO 435-250-002 $7.46CONDO 435-250-003 $7.46CONDO 435-250-004 $7.46CONDO 435-250-005 $7.46CONDO 435-250-006 $7.46CONDO 435-250-007 $7.46CONDO 435-250-008 $7.46CONDO 435-250-009 $7.46CONDO 435-250-010 $7.46CONDO 435-250-011 $7.46CONDO 435-250-012 $7.46CONDO 435-250-013 $7.46CONDO 435-250-014 $7.46CONDO 435-250-015 $7.46CONDO 435-250-016 $7.46CONDO 435-250-017 $7.46CONDO 435-250-018 $7.46CONDO 435-250-019 $7.46CONDO 435-250-020 $7.46CONDO 435-250-021 $7.46CONDO 435-250-022 $7.46CONDO 435-250-023 $7.46CONDO 435-250-024 $7.46CONDO 435-250-025 $7.46CONDO 435-250-026 $7.46CONDO 435-250-027 $7.46CONDO 435-250-028 $7.46CONDO 435-250-029 $7.46CONDO 435-250-030 $7.46CONDO 435-250-031 $7.46CONDO 435-250-032 $7.46CONDO 435-250-033 $7.46CONDO 435-250-034 $7.46CONDO 435-250-035 $7.46CONDO 435-250-036 $7.46CONDO 435-250-037 $7.46CONDO 435-250-038 $7.46CONDO 435-250-039 $7.46CONDO 435-250-040 $7.46CONDO 435-250-041 $7.46CONDO 435-250-042 $7.46CONDO 435-250-043 $7.46CONDO 435-250-044 $7.46CONDO 435-250-045 $7.46CONDO - 238 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-250-046 $7.46CONDO 435-250-047 $7.46CONDO 435-250-048 $7.46CONDO 435-250-049 $7.46CONDO 435-250-050 $7.46CONDO 435-250-051 $7.46CONDO 435-250-052 $7.46CONDO 435-250-053 $7.46CONDO 435-250-054 $7.46CONDO 435-250-055 $7.46CONDO 435-250-056 $7.46CONDO 435-250-057 $7.46CONDO 435-250-058 $7.46CONDO 435-250-059 $7.46CONDO 435-250-060 $7.46CONDO 435-250-061 $7.46CONDO 435-250-062 $7.46CONDO 435-250-063 $7.46CONDO 435-250-064 $7.46CONDO 435-250-065 $7.46CONDO 435-250-066 $7.46CONDO 435-250-067 $7.46CONDO 435-250-068 $7.46CONDO 435-250-069 $7.46CONDO 435-250-070 $7.46CONDO 435-250-071 $7.46CONDO 435-250-072 $7.46CONDO 435-250-073 $7.46CONDO 435-250-074 $7.46CONDO 435-250-075 $7.46CONDO 435-250-076 $7.46CONDO 435-250-077 $7.46CONDO 435-250-078 $7.46CONDO 435-250-079 $7.46CONDO 435-250-080 $7.46CONDO 435-250-081 $7.46CONDO 435-250-082 $7.46CONDO 435-250-083 $7.46CONDO 435-250-084 $7.46CONDO 435-250-085 $7.46CONDO 435-250-086 $7.46CONDO 435-250-087 $7.46CONDO 435-250-088 $7.46CONDO 435-250-089 $7.46CONDO 435-250-090 $7.46CONDO 435-250-091 $7.46CONDO 435-250-092 $7.46CONDO 435-250-093 $7.46CONDO 435-250-094 $7.46CONDO 435-250-095 $7.46CONDO 435-250-096 $7.46CONDO 435-250-097 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-250-098 $7.46CONDO 435-250-099 $7.46CONDO 435-250-100 $7.46CONDO 435-250-101 $7.46CONDO 435-250-102 $7.46CONDO 435-250-103 $7.46CONDO 435-250-104 $7.46CONDO 435-250-105 $7.46CONDO 435-250-106 $7.46CONDO 435-250-107 $7.46CONDO 435-250-108 $7.46CONDO 435-250-109 $7.46CONDO 435-250-110 $7.46CONDO 435-250-111 $7.46CONDO 435-250-112 $7.46CONDO 435-250-113 $7.46CONDO 435-250-114 $7.46CONDO 435-250-115 $7.46CONDO 435-250-116 $7.46CONDO 435-250-117 $7.46CONDO 435-250-118 $7.46CONDO 435-250-119 $7.46CONDO 435-250-120 $7.46CONDO 435-250-121 $7.46CONDO 435-250-122 $7.46CONDO 435-250-123 $7.46CONDO 435-250-124 $7.46CONDO 435-250-125 $7.46CONDO 435-250-126 $7.46CONDO 435-250-127 $7.46CONDO 435-250-128 $7.46CONDO 435-250-129 $7.46CONDO 435-250-130 $7.46CONDO 435-250-131 $7.46CONDO 435-250-132 $7.46CONDO 435-250-133 $7.46CONDO 435-250-134 $7.46CONDO 435-250-135 $7.46CONDO 435-250-136 $7.46CONDO 435-250-137 $7.46CONDO 435-250-138 $7.46CONDO 435-250-139 $7.46CONDO 435-250-140 $7.46CONDO 435-250-141 $7.46CONDO 435-250-142 $7.46CONDO 435-250-143 $7.46CONDO 435-250-144 $7.46CONDO 435-250-145 $7.46CONDO 435-250-146 $7.46CONDO 435-250-147 $7.46CONDO 435-250-148 $7.46CONDO 435-250-149 $7.46CONDO Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-250-150 $7.46CONDO 435-250-151 $7.46CONDO 435-250-152 $7.46CONDO 435-260-001 $7.46CONDO 435-260-002 $7.46CONDO 435-260-003 $7.46CONDO 435-260-004 $7.46CONDO 435-260-005 $7.46CONDO 435-260-006 $7.46CONDO 435-260-007 $7.46CONDO 435-260-008 $7.46CONDO 435-260-009 $7.46CONDO 435-260-010 $7.46CONDO 435-260-011 $7.46CONDO 435-270-001 $7.46CONDO 435-270-002 $7.46CONDO 435-270-003 $7.46CONDO 435-270-004 $7.46CONDO 435-270-005 $7.46CONDO 435-270-006 $7.46CONDO 435-270-007 $7.46CONDO 435-270-008 $7.46CONDO 435-270-009 $7.46CONDO 435-270-010 $7.46CONDO 435-270-011 $7.46CONDO 435-270-012 $7.46CONDO 435-270-013 $7.46CONDO 435-270-014 $7.46CONDO 435-270-015 $7.46CONDO 435-270-016 $7.46CONDO 435-270-017 $7.46CONDO 435-270-018 $7.46CONDO 435-270-019 $7.46CONDO 435-270-020 $7.46CONDO 435-270-021 $7.46CONDO 435-270-022 $7.46CONDO 435-270-023 $7.46CONDO 435-270-024 $7.46CONDO 435-270-025 $7.46CONDO 435-270-026 $7.46CONDO 435-270-027 $7.46CONDO 435-270-028 $7.46CONDO 435-270-029 $7.46CONDO 435-270-030 $7.46CONDO 435-270-031 $7.46CONDO 435-270-032 $7.46CONDO 435-270-033 $7.46CONDO 435-270-034 $7.46CONDO 435-270-035 $7.46CONDO 435-270-036 $7.46CONDO 435-270-037 $7.46CONDO 435-270-038 $7.46CONDO - 239 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 435-270-039 $7.46CONDO 435-270-040 $7.46CONDO 435-270-041 $7.46CONDO 435-270-042 $7.46CONDO 435-270-043 $7.46CONDO 435-270-044 $7.46CONDO 435-270-045 $7.46CONDO 435-270-046 $7.46CONDO 435-270-047 $7.46CONDO 435-270-048 $7.46CONDO 435-270-049 $7.46CONDO 435-270-050 $7.46CONDO 435-270-051 $7.46CONDO 435-280-001 $7.46CONDO 435-280-002 $7.46CONDO 435-280-003 $7.46CONDO 435-280-004 $7.46CONDO 435-280-005 $7.46CONDO 435-280-006 $7.46CONDO 435-280-007 $7.46CONDO 435-280-008 $7.46CONDO 435-280-009 $7.46CONDO 435-280-010 $7.46CONDO 435-280-011 $7.46CONDO 435-280-012 $7.46CONDO 435-280-013 $7.46CONDO 435-280-014 $7.46CONDO 435-280-015 $7.46CONDO 435-280-016 $7.46CONDO 435-280-017 $7.46CONDO 435-280-018 $7.46CONDO 435-280-019 $7.46CONDO 435-280-020 $7.46CONDO 435-280-021 $7.46CONDO 435-280-022 $7.46CONDO 435-280-023 $7.46CONDO 435-280-024 $7.46CONDO 435-280-025 $7.46CONDO 435-280-026 $7.46CONDO 435-280-027 $7.46CONDO 435-280-028 $7.46CONDO 520-020-004 $14.94SFR 520-020-005 $14.94SFR 520-020-006 $14.94SFR 520-020-007 $14.94SFR 520-020-008 $14.94SFR 520-020-009 $14.94SFR 520-020-010 $29.88MFR2 520-020-011 $14.94SFR 520-020-012 $14.94SFR 520-020-013 $14.94SFR 520-031-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 520-031-006 $14.94SFR 520-031-007 $14.94SFR 520-031-008 $14.94SFR 520-031-009 $14.94SFR 520-031-010 $14.94SFR 520-031-011 $14.94SFR 520-031-012 $14.94SFR 520-031-013 $14.94SFR 520-031-014 $14.94SFR 520-031-015 $14.94SFR 520-031-016 $14.94SFR 520-031-017 $14.94SFR 520-032-001 $14.94SFR 520-032-003 $14.94SFR 520-032-004 $14.94SFR 520-032-005 $14.94SFR 520-032-006 $14.94SFR 520-032-007 $14.94SFR 520-032-008 $14.94SFR 520-041-001 $14.94SFR 520-041-002 $14.94SFR 520-041-003 $14.94SFR 520-041-004 $14.94SFR 520-041-005 $14.94SFR 520-041-006 $14.94SFR 520-041-007 $14.94SFR 520-041-008 $14.94SFR 520-041-009 $14.94SFR 520-041-010 $14.94SFR 520-041-011 $14.94SFR 520-041-012 $14.94SFR 520-041-013 $14.94SFR 520-041-014 $14.94SFR 520-041-015 $14.94SFR 520-041-016 $14.94SFR 520-041-017 $14.94SFR 520-042-003 $14.94SFR 520-042-004 $14.94SFR 520-042-005 $14.94SFR 520-042-006 $14.94SFR 520-042-007 $14.94SFR 520-042-008 $14.94SFR 520-042-009 $14.94SFR 520-042-010 $14.94SFR 520-042-011 $14.94SFR 520-042-012 $14.94SFR 520-061-003 $74.70INST 520-061-004 $74.70INST 520-062-002 $14.94SFR 520-062-003 $14.94SFR 520-062-004 $14.94SFR 520-062-005 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 520-062-006 $14.94SFR 520-062-007 $14.94SFR 520-070-001 $14.94SFR 520-070-002 $14.94SFR 520-070-003 $14.94SFR 520-070-005 $14.94SFR 520-070-006 $14.94SFR 520-070-007 $14.94SFR 520-070-008 $14.94SFR 520-080-001 $14.94SFR 520-080-002 $14.94SFR 520-080-003 $14.94SFR 520-080-004 $14.94SFR 520-080-005 $14.94SFR 520-080-006 $29.88MFR2 520-080-007 $14.94SFR 520-080-008 $14.94SFR 520-080-009 $14.94SFR 520-080-010 $14.94SFR 520-080-011 $14.94SFR 520-080-012 $14.94SFR 520-080-013 $14.94SFR 520-080-014 $29.88MFR2 520-080-015 $44.82MFR 520-080-016 $14.94SFR 520-080-017 $14.94SFR 520-080-018 $14.94SFR 520-080-019 $14.94SFR 520-080-020 $14.94SFR 520-080-021 $14.94SFR 520-080-022 $14.94SFR 520-090-002 $14.94SFR 520-090-003 $14.94SFR 520-090-004 $14.94SFR 520-090-005 $14.94SFR 520-090-006 $14.94SFR 520-090-007 $14.94SFR 520-090-008 $14.94SFR 520-090-009 $14.94SFR 520-090-010 $14.94SFR 520-090-011 $14.94SFR 520-090-012 $14.94SFR 520-090-013 $14.94SFR 520-090-014 $14.94SFR 520-090-019 $14.94SFR 520-090-020 $14.94SFR 520-090-021 $14.94SFR 520-100-001 $14.94SFR 520-100-002 $14.94SFR 520-100-003 $14.94SFR 520-131-003 $14.94SFR 520-131-004 $14.94SFR - 240 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 520-131-005 $14.94SFR 520-131-006 $14.94SFR 520-131-007 $14.94SFR 520-131-009 $14.94SFR 520-131-010 $14.94SFR 520-131-011 $14.94SFR 520-131-012 $14.94SFR 520-131-013 $14.94SFR 520-131-024 $14.94SFR 520-131-025 $14.94SFR 520-132-001 $14.94SFR 520-132-002 $14.94SFR 520-132-003 $14.94SFR 520-132-004 $14.94SFR 520-132-005 $14.94SFR 520-132-006 $14.94SFR 520-132-007 $14.94SFR 520-132-008 $14.94SFR 520-132-009 $14.94SFR 520-132-010 $14.94SFR 520-132-011 $14.94SFR 520-132-012 $14.94SFR 520-132-013 $14.94SFR 520-132-014 $14.94SFR 520-132-015 $14.94SFR 520-132-016 $14.94SFR 520-132-017 $14.94SFR 520-132-018 $14.94SFR 520-132-019 $14.94SFR 520-140-001 $14.94SFR 520-140-002 $14.94SFR 520-140-003 $14.94SFR 520-140-004 $14.94SFR 520-140-005 $14.94SFR 520-140-006 $14.94SFR 520-140-007 $14.94SFR 520-140-008 $14.94SFR 520-140-009 $14.94SFR 520-140-010 $14.94SFR 520-140-011 $14.94SFR 520-140-012 $14.94SFR 520-140-013 $14.94SFR 520-140-014 $14.94SFR 520-140-015 $14.94SFR 520-140-016 $14.94SFR 520-140-017 $14.94SFR 520-140-018 $14.94SFR 520-140-019 $14.94SFR 520-140-020 $14.94SFR 520-140-021 $14.94SFR 520-140-022 $14.94SFR 520-140-024 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 520-140-025 $14.94SFR 520-140-026 $14.94SFR 520-140-027 $14.94SFR 520-150-005 $14.94SFR 520-150-006 $14.94SFR 520-150-007 $29.88MFR2 520-150-008 $14.94SFR 520-150-009 $14.94SFR 520-150-010 $14.94SFR 520-150-011 $14.94SFR 520-150-012 $14.94SFR 520-150-013 $14.94SFR 520-150-014 $14.94SFR 520-150-015 $14.94SFR 520-150-016 $14.94SFR 520-150-031 $14.94SFR 520-181-007 $14.94SFR 520-181-008 $14.94SFR 520-181-009 $14.94SFR 520-181-010 $14.94SFR 520-181-011 $14.94SFR 520-181-012 $14.94SFR 520-181-013 $14.94SFR 520-182-001 $14.94SFR 520-182-002 $14.94SFR 520-182-003 $14.94SFR 520-182-005 $14.94SFR 520-182-006 $14.94SFR 520-182-007 $14.94SFR 520-182-008 $14.94SFR 520-182-009 $14.94SFR 520-182-010 $14.94SFR 520-182-015 $14.94SFR 520-182-016 $14.94SFR 520-182-017 $14.94SFR 520-182-020 $14.94SFR 520-182-022 $14.94SFR 521-011-001 $14.94SFR 521-011-002 $14.94SFR 521-011-003 $14.94SFR 521-011-004 $14.94SFR 521-011-005 $14.94SFR 521-011-007 $14.94SFR 521-011-008 $14.94SFR 521-011-009 $14.94SFR 521-011-013 $14.94SFR 521-011-014 $14.94SFR 521-011-015 $14.94SFR 521-011-016 $14.94SFR 521-011-017 $14.94SFR 521-011-018 $14.94SFR 521-012-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-012-002 $14.94SFR 521-012-003 $14.94SFR 521-012-005 $14.94SFR 521-012-006 $14.94SFR 521-012-007 $14.94SFR 521-012-008 $14.94SFR 521-012-009 $14.94SFR 521-012-011 $14.94SFR 521-012-012 $29.88MFR2 521-012-015 $14.94SFR 521-012-016 $14.94SFR 521-012-018 $14.94SFR 521-012-019 $14.94SFR 521-012-020 $14.94SFR 521-021-001 $14.94SFR 521-021-002 $14.94SFR 521-021-003 $14.94SFR 521-021-004 $14.94SFR 521-021-005 $14.94SFR 521-021-006 $14.94SFR 521-021-007 $14.94SFR 521-021-008 $14.94SFR 521-021-010 $14.94SFR 521-021-011 $14.94SFR 521-021-012 $14.94SFR 521-021-013 $14.94SFR 521-021-014 $14.94SFR 521-021-015 $14.94SFR 521-021-016 $14.94SFR 521-022-001 $14.94SFR 521-022-002 $14.94SFR 521-022-003 $29.88MFR2 521-022-004 $14.94SFR 521-022-005 $14.94SFR 521-022-006 $14.94SFR 521-022-007 $14.94SFR 521-022-008 $14.94SFR 521-022-009 $14.94SFR 521-022-015 $29.88MFR2 521-022-016 $14.94SFR 521-022-017 $14.94SFR 521-022-018 $14.94SFR 521-022-019 $14.94SFR 521-022-020 $14.94SFR 521-022-021 $14.94SFR 521-022-022 $14.94SFR 521-022-023 $14.94SFR 521-022-024 $14.94SFR 521-022-028 $14.94SFR 521-022-029 $14.94SFR 521-031-001 $14.94SFR 521-031-002 $14.94SFR - 241 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-031-003 $29.88MFR2 521-031-004 $14.94SFR 521-031-005 $14.94SFR 521-031-006 $14.94SFR 521-031-007 $14.94SFR 521-031-008 $14.94SFR 521-031-009 $14.94SFR 521-031-010 $14.94SFR 521-031-011 $14.94SFR 521-032-001 $14.94SFR 521-032-002 $14.94SFR 521-032-003 $14.94SFR 521-032-004 $14.94SFR 521-032-005 $14.94SFR 521-032-006 $14.94SFR 521-032-007 $14.94SFR 521-032-008 $14.94SFR 521-032-009 $14.94SFR 521-032-010 $14.94SFR 521-032-011 $14.94SFR 521-032-012 $14.94SFR 521-032-013 $14.94SFR 521-032-014 $14.94SFR 521-032-015 $14.94SFR 521-032-016 $14.94SFR 521-032-017 $14.94SFR 521-032-018 $14.94SFR 521-041-001 $14.94SFR 521-041-002 $14.94SFR 521-041-003 $14.94SFR 521-041-004 $14.94SFR 521-041-005 $14.94SFR 521-041-007 $14.94SFR 521-041-008 $14.94SFR 521-041-009 $14.94SFR 521-041-010 $14.94SFR 521-041-011 $14.94SFR 521-041-012 $14.94SFR 521-041-013 $14.94SFR 521-041-014 $14.94SFR 521-041-015 $14.94SFR 521-041-016 $14.94SFR 521-041-017 $14.94SFR 521-041-018 $14.94SFR 521-041-019 $14.94SFR 521-042-001 $14.94SFR 521-042-002 $14.94SFR 521-042-003 $14.94SFR 521-042-004 $14.94SFR 521-042-005 $14.94SFR 521-042-006 $7.46VSFR 521-042-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-042-009 $14.94SFR 521-042-010 $7.46VSFR 521-042-011 $14.94SFR 521-042-012 $14.94SFR 521-042-013 $14.94SFR 521-042-016 $14.94SFR 521-042-017 $14.94SFR 521-051-001 $14.94SFR 521-051-002 $14.94SFR 521-051-003 $14.94SFR 521-051-004 $14.94SFR 521-051-005 $14.94SFR 521-051-006 $14.94SFR 521-051-007 $14.94SFR 521-051-008 $14.94SFR 521-051-009 $14.94SFR 521-051-010 $14.94SFR 521-051-011 $14.94SFR 521-051-012 $14.94SFR 521-051-013 $14.94SFR 521-051-014 $14.94SFR 521-052-001 $29.88MFR2 521-052-002 $14.94SFR 521-052-003 $14.94SFR 521-052-004 $14.94SFR 521-052-005 $14.94SFR 521-052-006 $14.94SFR 521-052-007 $14.94SFR 521-052-008 $14.94SFR 521-052-009 $14.94SFR 521-052-010 $14.94SFR 521-052-011 $14.94SFR 521-061-001 $14.94SFR 521-061-002 $14.94SFR 521-061-003 $29.88MFR2 521-061-004 $14.94SFR 521-061-005 $14.94SFR 521-061-006 $14.94SFR 521-061-007 $14.94SFR 521-061-008 $14.94SFR 521-061-009 $14.94SFR 521-061-010 $14.94SFR 521-061-011 $14.94SFR 521-061-012 $14.94SFR 521-061-013 $14.94SFR 521-061-014 $14.94SFR 521-061-016 $14.94SFR 521-061-017 $14.94SFR 521-061-018 $14.94SFR 521-061-019 $14.94SFR 521-061-020 $7.46VSFR 521-061-021 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-061-022 $59.76MFR4 521-062-002 $14.94SFR 521-062-003 $14.94SFR 521-062-004 $14.94SFR 521-062-006 $14.94SFR 521-062-007 $7.46VSFR 521-062-008 $14.94SFR 521-062-009 $14.94SFR 521-062-010 $14.94SFR 521-062-011 $14.94SFR 521-062-012 $14.94SFR 521-062-013 $14.94SFR 521-062-014 $14.94SFR 521-062-015 $14.94SFR 521-062-017 $14.94SFR 521-062-018 $14.94SFR 521-062-019 $14.94SFR 521-062-020 $14.94SFR 521-062-021 $14.94SFR 521-062-022 $14.94SFR 521-062-023 $29.88MFR2 521-062-024 $7.46VSFR 521-071-001 $14.94SFR 521-071-002 $14.94SFR 521-071-003 $14.94SFR 521-071-004 $14.94SFR 521-071-005 $14.94SFR 521-071-006 $14.94SFR 521-071-007 $14.94SFR 521-071-008 $14.94SFR 521-071-009 $14.94SFR 521-071-010 $14.94SFR 521-071-011 $14.94SFR 521-071-012 $14.94SFR 521-071-013 $7.46VSFR 521-071-014 $14.94SFR 521-072-001 $14.94SFR 521-072-002 $14.94SFR 521-072-003 $14.94SFR 521-072-004 $14.94SFR 521-072-005 $14.94SFR 521-072-006 $14.94SFR 521-072-007 $14.94SFR 521-072-008 $14.94SFR 521-072-009 $14.94SFR 521-072-010 $14.94SFR 521-072-011 $14.94SFR 521-072-016 $14.94SFR 521-072-021 $14.94SFR 521-073-003 $14.94SFR 521-073-004 $14.94SFR 521-073-005 $14.94SFR - 242 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-073-006 $14.94SFR 521-073-007 $14.94SFR 521-073-008 $14.94SFR 521-073-009 $14.94SFR 521-073-010 $14.94SFR 521-073-011 $14.94SFR 521-073-012 $14.94SFR 521-073-013 $14.94SFR 521-073-014 $14.94SFR 521-073-015 $14.94SFR 521-073-016 $14.94SFR 521-073-017 $14.94SFR 521-080-002 $14.94SFR 521-080-003 $14.94SFR 521-080-004 $14.94SFR 521-080-005 $14.94SFR 521-080-006 $14.94SFR 521-080-007 $14.94SFR 521-080-008 $14.94SFR 521-080-009 $14.94SFR 521-080-010 $14.94SFR 521-080-011 $14.94SFR 521-080-012 $14.94SFR 521-080-013 $14.94SFR 521-080-014 $14.94SFR 521-080-015 $14.94SFR 521-080-016 $14.94SFR 521-080-017 $14.94SFR 521-091-002 $14.94SFR 521-091-003 $14.94SFR 521-091-004 $14.94SFR 521-091-005 $74.70COM 521-091-007 $14.94SFR 521-091-008 $14.94SFR 521-091-011 $14.94SFR 521-091-012 $14.94SFR 521-091-013 $14.94SFR 521-091-016 $14.94SFR 521-091-017 $14.94SFR 521-091-018 $29.88MFR2 521-091-019 $14.94SFR 521-091-020 $14.94SFR 521-091-021 $14.94SFR 521-091-023 $14.94SFR 521-091-024 $14.94SFR 521-091-025 $14.94SFR 521-091-026 $14.94SFR 521-091-027 $14.94SFR 521-091-028 $14.94SFR 521-091-029 $14.94SFR 521-091-030 $14.94SFR 521-091-031 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-091-032 $14.94SFR 521-091-033 $14.94SFR 521-091-034 $29.88MFR2 521-091-035 $14.94SFR 521-091-036 $14.94SFR 521-091-037 $29.88MFR2 521-101-001 $14.94SFR 521-101-002 $14.94SFR 521-101-003 $14.94SFR 521-101-004 $14.94SFR 521-101-005 $14.94SFR 521-101-006 $14.94SFR 521-101-007 $14.94SFR 521-101-008 $14.94SFR 521-101-009 $14.94SFR 521-101-010 $14.94SFR 521-101-011 $14.94SFR 521-101-012 $14.94SFR 521-101-013 $14.94SFR 521-101-014 $14.94SFR 521-101-015 $14.94SFR 521-102-001 $14.94SFR 521-102-002 $14.94SFR 521-102-003 $14.94SFR 521-102-004 $14.94SFR 521-102-008 $14.94SFR 521-102-009 $14.94SFR 521-102-010 $14.94SFR 521-102-011 $14.94SFR 521-102-012 $14.94SFR 521-102-013 $14.94SFR 521-102-014 $14.94SFR 521-102-015 $14.94SFR 521-102-016 $14.94SFR 521-102-017 $14.94SFR 521-102-018 $14.94SFR 521-102-020 $14.94SFR 521-102-021 $14.94SFR 521-103-001 $14.94SFR 521-103-002 $14.94SFR 521-103-003 $14.94SFR 521-103-004 $14.94SFR 521-103-005 $14.94SFR 521-103-006 $14.94SFR 521-103-007 $14.94SFR 521-103-010 $14.94SFR 521-103-012 $14.94SFR 521-103-013 $14.94SFR 521-103-014 $14.94SFR 521-103-015 $14.94SFR 521-103-018 $14.94SFR 521-103-019 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-103-021 $14.94SFR 521-103-022 $14.94SFR 521-111-001 $14.94SFR 521-111-002 $14.94SFR 521-111-003 $14.94SFR 521-111-004 $14.94SFR 521-111-005 $14.94SFR 521-111-006 $14.94SFR 521-111-007 $14.94SFR 521-111-008 $14.94SFR 521-111-009 $14.94SFR 521-111-010 $14.94SFR 521-111-011 $14.94SFR 521-111-012 $14.94SFR 521-112-001 $14.94SFR 521-112-002 $14.94SFR 521-112-003 $14.94SFR 521-112-004 $14.94SFR 521-112-006 $14.94SFR 521-112-007 $14.94SFR 521-112-008 $14.94SFR 521-112-009 $14.94SFR 521-112-010 $14.94SFR 521-112-011 $14.94SFR 521-112-012 $14.94SFR 521-112-013 $14.94SFR 521-113-002 $7.46VSFR 521-113-003 $14.94SFR 521-113-004 $14.94SFR 521-113-005 $14.94SFR 521-113-006 $14.94SFR 521-113-007 $14.94SFR 521-113-008 $14.94SFR 521-113-009 $14.94SFR 521-113-010 $14.94SFR 521-113-011 $14.94SFR 521-113-012 $14.94SFR 521-113-013 $14.94SFR 521-113-014 $14.94SFR 521-121-001 $14.94SFR 521-121-002 $14.94SFR 521-121-003 $14.94SFR 521-121-007 $14.94SFR 521-121-008 $14.94SFR 521-121-009 $14.94SFR 521-121-011 $14.94SFR 521-121-012 $14.94SFR 521-122-001 $14.94SFR 521-122-002 $14.94SFR 521-122-003 $14.94SFR 521-122-005 $14.94SFR 521-122-006 $14.94SFR - 243 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-122-007 $14.94SFR 521-122-008 $14.94SFR 521-122-009 $14.94SFR 521-122-010 $14.94SFR 521-122-011 $14.94SFR 521-122-012 $14.94SFR 521-122-013 $14.94SFR 521-122-014 $14.94SFR 521-122-015 $14.94SFR 521-131-001 $14.94SFR 521-131-002 $14.94SFR 521-131-003 $14.94SFR 521-131-004 $14.94SFR 521-131-005 $14.94SFR 521-131-006 $14.94SFR 521-131-007 $14.94SFR 521-131-008 $14.94SFR 521-131-010 $14.94SFR 521-131-017 $14.94SFR 521-131-020 $14.94SFR 521-131-021 $14.94SFR 521-131-022 $14.94SFR 521-131-023 $14.94SFR 521-131-024 $14.94SFR 521-131-025 $14.94SFR 521-131-026 $14.94SFR 521-131-027 $14.94SFR 521-131-029 $14.94SFR 521-131-031 $14.94SFR 521-131-032 $14.94SFR 521-131-035 $14.94SFR 521-131-036 $14.94SFR 521-131-037 $14.94SFR 521-132-001 $14.94SFR 521-132-004 $14.94SFR 521-132-005 $14.94SFR 521-132-008 $14.94SFR 521-132-009 $14.94SFR 521-132-010 $14.94SFR 521-132-011 $14.94SFR 521-132-012 $14.94SFR 521-132-013 $14.94SFR 521-132-014 $14.94SFR 521-132-015 $14.94SFR 521-132-016 $14.94SFR 521-132-017 $14.94SFR 521-132-018 $14.94SFR 521-132-019 $7.46VSFR 521-132-020 $14.94SFR 521-132-021 $14.94SFR 521-132-022 $14.94SFR 521-140-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-140-002 $14.94SFR 521-140-003 $14.94SFR 521-140-004 $14.94SFR 521-140-005 $14.94SFR 521-140-006 $14.94SFR 521-140-007 $14.94SFR 521-140-008 $14.94SFR 521-140-009 $14.94SFR 521-151-001 $14.94SFR 521-151-002 $14.94SFR 521-151-003 $14.94SFR 521-151-004 $14.94SFR 521-151-005 $14.94SFR 521-151-006 $14.94SFR 521-151-007 $14.94SFR 521-151-008 $14.94SFR 521-151-009 $14.94SFR 521-151-010 $14.94SFR 521-151-011 $14.94SFR 521-151-012 $14.94SFR 521-151-013 $14.94SFR 521-151-014 $14.94SFR 521-151-015 $14.94SFR 521-151-016 $14.94SFR 521-151-017 $14.94SFR 521-151-018 $14.94SFR 521-151-019 $14.94SFR 521-151-024 $14.94SFR 521-151-025 $14.94SFR 521-151-026 $14.94SFR 521-151-027 $14.94SFR 521-151-032 $14.94SFR 521-151-033 $14.94SFR 521-151-034 $14.94SFR 521-151-035 $14.94SFR 521-152-001 $14.94SFR 521-152-002 $14.94SFR 521-152-003 $7.46VSFR 521-152-004 $14.94SFR 521-152-005 $14.94SFR 521-152-006 $14.94SFR 521-152-007 $14.94SFR 521-152-008 $14.94SFR 521-152-009 $29.88MFR2 521-152-010 $14.94SFR 521-152-011 $14.94SFR 521-152-012 $14.94SFR 521-152-014 $14.94SFR 521-152-015 $14.94SFR 521-152-017 $14.94SFR 521-152-018 $14.94SFR 521-152-019 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-152-020 $14.94SFR 521-152-021 $14.94SFR 521-152-022 $14.94SFR 521-152-025 $14.94SFR 521-152-026 $14.94SFR 521-152-027 $14.94SFR 521-160-002 $14.94SFR 521-160-003 $14.94SFR 521-160-004 $14.94SFR 521-160-005 $14.94SFR 521-160-006 $14.94SFR 521-160-007 $7.46VSFR 521-160-008 $14.94SFR 521-160-009 $74.70COM 521-160-010 $14.94SFR 521-160-011 $14.94SFR 521-160-012 $14.94SFR 521-160-013 $14.94SFR 521-160-014 $14.94SFR 521-160-015 $14.94SFR 521-160-016 $14.94SFR 521-160-017 $14.94SFR 521-160-018 $14.94SFR 521-160-019 $14.94SFR 521-160-020 $14.94SFR 521-160-021 $14.94SFR 521-170-002 $14.94SFR 521-170-003 $14.94SFR 521-170-004 $14.94SFR 521-170-005 $14.94SFR 521-170-006 $14.94SFR 521-170-007 $14.94SFR 521-170-008 $14.94SFR 521-170-009 $14.94SFR 521-170-010 $14.94SFR 521-170-011 $14.94SFR 521-170-012 $14.94SFR 521-170-013 $14.94SFR 521-170-014 $14.94SFR 521-170-015 $14.94SFR 521-170-016 $14.94SFR 521-170-017 $14.94SFR 521-170-018 $14.94SFR 521-170-019 $14.94SFR 521-170-020 $14.94SFR 521-170-021 $14.94SFR 521-170-022 $14.94SFR 521-170-023 $14.94SFR 521-170-024 $14.94SFR 521-170-025 $14.94SFR 521-170-026 $14.94SFR 521-170-027 $14.94SFR - 244 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-170-028 $14.94SFR 521-170-031 $14.94SFR 521-170-032 $14.94SFR 521-170-033 $14.94SFR 521-180-001 $14.94SFR 521-180-002 $14.94SFR 521-180-003 $14.94SFR 521-180-004 $14.94SFR 521-180-005 $14.94SFR 521-180-006 $14.94SFR 521-180-007 $14.94SFR 521-180-008 $14.94SFR 521-180-009 $74.70INST 521-180-010 $14.94SFR 521-180-011 $14.94SFR 521-180-012 $14.94SFR 521-180-013 $14.94SFR 521-180-014 $14.94SFR 521-191-002 $14.94SFR 521-191-003 $29.88MFR2 521-191-004 $14.94SFR 521-191-005 $14.94SFR 521-191-006 $14.94SFR 521-191-007 $14.94SFR 521-191-008 $14.94SFR 521-191-009 $14.94SFR 521-210-001 $14.94SFR 521-210-002 $14.94SFR 521-210-003 $14.94SFR 521-210-004 $14.94SFR 521-210-005 $14.94SFR 521-210-006 $14.94SFR 521-210-007 $14.94SFR 521-210-008 $14.94SFR 521-210-009 $14.94SFR 521-210-010 $14.94SFR 521-210-011 $14.94SFR 521-210-012 $14.94SFR 521-210-013 $14.94SFR 521-210-014 $14.94SFR 521-210-015 $14.94SFR 521-210-016 $14.94SFR 521-210-017 $14.94SFR 521-210-018 $14.94SFR 521-210-019 $14.94SFR 521-220-002 $14.94SFR 521-220-003 $14.94SFR 521-220-004 $14.94SFR 521-220-005 $14.94SFR 521-220-006 $14.94SFR 521-220-009 $14.94SFR 521-230-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-230-002 $14.94SFR 521-230-003 $14.94SFR 521-230-004 $14.94SFR 521-230-006 $14.94SFR 521-230-007 $14.94SFR 521-230-008 $14.94SFR 521-230-009 $14.94SFR 521-230-010 $14.94SFR 521-230-011 $14.94SFR 521-230-014 $14.94SFR 521-230-015 $14.94SFR 521-230-018 $14.94SFR 521-240-001 $14.94SFR 521-240-002 $14.94SFR 521-240-003 $14.94SFR 521-240-004 $14.94SFR 521-240-005 $14.94SFR 521-240-006 $14.94SFR 521-240-007 $14.94SFR 521-240-008 $14.94SFR 521-240-009 $14.94SFR 521-240-010 $14.94SFR 521-240-011 $14.94SFR 521-240-012 $14.94SFR 521-240-013 $14.94SFR 521-240-014 $14.94SFR 521-240-015 $7.46VSFR 521-240-016 $14.94SFR 521-240-017 $14.94SFR 521-240-018 $14.94SFR 521-250-002 $14.94SFR 521-250-003 $14.94SFR 521-250-005 $14.94SFR 521-250-008 $14.94SFR 521-250-009 $14.94SFR 521-250-010 $14.94SFR 521-250-011 $14.94SFR 521-250-015 $14.94SFR 521-250-016 $14.94SFR 521-250-017 $14.94SFR 521-250-018 $14.94SFR 521-250-019 $14.94SFR 521-250-020 $14.94SFR 521-250-021 $14.94SFR 521-250-022 $14.94SFR 521-250-023 $14.94SFR 521-250-024 $14.94SFR 521-250-025 $14.94SFR 521-250-026 $14.94SFR 521-250-027 $14.94SFR 521-250-028 $14.94SFR 521-250-029 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 521-250-030 $14.94SFR 521-250-031 $14.94SFR 521-260-001 $14.94SFR 521-260-002 $14.94SFR 521-260-003 $14.94SFR 521-260-004 $14.94SFR 521-260-005 $14.94SFR 521-260-006 $14.94SFR 521-260-007 $14.94SFR 521-260-008 $14.94SFR 521-260-009 $14.94SFR 521-260-010 $29.88MFR2 521-260-012 $14.94SFR 521-260-013 $14.94SFR 521-260-014 $14.94SFR 521-260-015 $14.94SFR 521-260-016 $14.94SFR 521-260-017 $29.88MFR2 521-260-018 $14.94SFR 521-260-019 $14.94SFR 521-260-020 $14.94SFR 521-260-021 $14.94SFR 521-260-022 $14.94SFR 521-260-023 $14.94SFR 521-260-024 $14.94SFR 521-271-002 $14.94SFR 521-271-003 $14.94SFR 521-271-004 $14.94SFR 521-271-005 $14.94SFR 521-271-006 $14.94SFR 521-271-007 $14.94SFR 521-271-008 $14.94SFR 521-271-009 $14.94SFR 521-271-010 $14.94SFR 521-271-012 $14.94SFR 521-271-013 $14.94SFR 521-271-015 $14.94SFR 521-271-016 $14.94SFR 521-271-017 $14.94SFR 521-271-018 $14.94SFR 521-271-019 $7.46VSFR 521-272-001 $14.94SFR 521-272-002 $14.94SFR 521-272-003 $14.94SFR 521-272-005 $14.94SFR 521-272-006 $14.94SFR 521-272-007 $14.94SFR 521-272-008 $14.94SFR 521-272-009 $14.94SFR 521-272-011 $14.94SFR 521-272-012 $14.94SFR 521-272-013 $14.94SFR - 245 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 561-120-016 $74.70VIND 570-011-002 $14.94SFR 570-011-003 $14.94SFR 570-011-004 $14.94SFR 570-011-005 $14.94SFR 570-011-006 $14.94SFR 570-011-007 $14.94SFR 570-011-008 $14.94SFR 570-011-009 $14.94SFR 570-011-010 $14.94SFR 570-011-011 $14.94SFR 570-011-012 $14.94SFR 570-011-013 $14.94SFR 570-011-014 $14.94SFR 570-012-001 $14.94SFR 570-012-002 $14.94SFR 570-012-003 $14.94SFR 570-012-004 $14.94SFR 570-012-005 $14.94SFR 570-012-008 $14.94SFR 570-012-009 $14.94SFR 570-012-010 $14.94SFR 570-012-011 $14.94SFR 570-012-012 $14.94SFR 570-012-013 $14.94SFR 570-012-014 $14.94SFR 570-012-015 $14.94SFR 570-012-016 $14.94SFR 570-020-001 $14.94SFR 570-020-002 $14.94SFR 570-020-003 $14.94SFR 570-020-004 $14.94SFR 570-020-005 $14.94SFR 570-020-006 $14.94SFR 570-020-007 $7.46VSFR 570-020-010 $14.94SFR 570-020-011 $14.94SFR 570-020-012 $14.94SFR 570-020-013 $14.94SFR 570-020-014 $14.94SFR 570-020-015 $29.88MFR2 570-031-001 $14.94SFR 570-031-002 $14.94SFR 570-031-003 $14.94SFR 570-031-004 $14.94SFR 570-031-005 $14.94SFR 570-031-006 $14.94SFR 570-031-007 $14.94SFR 570-031-008 $14.94SFR 570-031-009 $14.94SFR 570-031-010 $14.94SFR 570-031-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-031-012 $14.94SFR 570-031-013 $14.94SFR 570-031-014 $14.94SFR 570-032-001 $14.94SFR 570-032-002 $14.94SFR 570-032-003 $14.94SFR 570-032-004 $14.94SFR 570-032-005 $14.94SFR 570-032-006 $14.94SFR 570-032-007 $14.94SFR 570-032-008 $14.94SFR 570-032-009 $14.94SFR 570-032-010 $14.94SFR 570-032-011 $14.94SFR 570-032-012 $14.94SFR 570-032-013 $29.88MFR2 570-032-014 $14.94SFR 570-032-015 $14.94SFR 570-032-016 $14.94SFR 570-032-017 $14.94SFR 570-032-018 $14.94SFR 570-032-019 $14.94SFR 570-032-020 $14.94SFR 570-032-021 $14.94SFR 570-032-022 $14.94SFR 570-032-023 $14.94SFR 570-032-024 $14.94SFR 570-032-025 $14.94SFR 570-032-026 $14.94SFR 570-032-027 $14.94SFR 570-032-028 $14.94SFR 570-032-029 $14.94SFR 570-032-030 $14.94SFR 570-032-031 $14.94SFR 570-041-001 $14.94SFR 570-041-002 $14.94SFR 570-041-003 $14.94SFR 570-041-004 $14.94SFR 570-041-005 $14.94SFR 570-041-006 $14.94SFR 570-041-007 $14.94SFR 570-041-008 $14.94SFR 570-041-009 $14.94SFR 570-041-010 $14.94SFR 570-041-011 $14.94SFR 570-041-012 $14.94SFR 570-041-013 $14.94SFR 570-041-014 $14.94SFR 570-041-015 $14.94SFR 570-041-016 $14.94SFR 570-041-017 $14.94SFR 570-041-018 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-041-019 $14.94SFR 570-041-021 $14.94SFR 570-041-022 $14.94SFR 570-041-023 $14.94SFR 570-041-024 $14.94SFR 570-041-025 $14.94SFR 570-042-001 $14.94SFR 570-042-002 $14.94SFR 570-042-003 $14.94SFR 570-042-004 $14.94SFR 570-042-005 $14.94SFR 570-042-006 $14.94SFR 570-042-007 $14.94SFR 570-042-008 $14.94SFR 570-042-009 $14.94SFR 570-042-010 $14.94SFR 570-042-011 $14.94SFR 570-042-012 $14.94SFR 570-042-013 $14.94SFR 570-042-014 $14.94SFR 570-042-015 $14.94SFR 570-042-016 $14.94SFR 570-042-017 $14.94SFR 570-042-018 $29.88MFR2 570-042-019 $14.94SFR 570-042-020 $14.94SFR 570-042-021 $14.94SFR 570-050-001 $14.94SFR 570-050-002 $14.94SFR 570-050-003 $14.94SFR 570-050-004 $14.94SFR 570-050-005 $14.94SFR 570-050-006 $14.94SFR 570-050-007 $14.94SFR 570-050-008 $14.94SFR 570-050-009 $14.94SFR 570-050-010 $14.94SFR 570-050-011 $14.94SFR 570-050-012 $14.94SFR 570-050-013 $14.94SFR 570-050-014 $14.94SFR 570-050-017 $14.94SFR 570-050-018 $14.94SFR 570-050-019 $14.94SFR 570-050-020 $14.94SFR 570-050-022 $14.94SFR 570-050-023 $14.94SFR 570-050-024 $14.94SFR 570-050-025 $14.94SFR 570-050-026 $14.94SFR 570-050-027 $14.94SFR 570-060-001 $14.94SFR - 246 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-060-002 $14.94SFR 570-060-003 $14.94SFR 570-060-004 $14.94SFR 570-060-005 $14.94SFR 570-060-006 $29.88MFR2 570-060-007 $14.94SFR 570-060-008 $14.94SFR 570-060-009 $14.94SFR 570-060-010 $14.94SFR 570-060-011 $14.94SFR 570-060-012 $74.70COM 570-060-013 $74.70COM 570-060-014 $74.70COM 570-060-017 $74.70COM 570-060-018 $14.94SFR 570-060-019 $14.94SFR 570-060-020 $14.94SFR 570-060-021 $14.94SFR 570-060-022 $14.94SFR 570-060-023 $74.70COM 570-071-001 $14.94SFR 570-071-002 $14.94SFR 570-071-003 $14.94SFR 570-071-004 $14.94SFR 570-071-005 $14.94SFR 570-071-006 $14.94SFR 570-071-007 $14.94SFR 570-071-008 $14.94SFR 570-071-009 $14.94SFR 570-071-010 $14.94SFR 570-072-001 $14.94SFR 570-072-002 $14.94SFR 570-072-003 $14.94SFR 570-072-004 $14.94SFR 570-072-005 $14.94SFR 570-072-006 $14.94SFR 570-072-007 $29.88MFR2 570-072-008 $14.94SFR 570-072-009 $14.94SFR 570-072-010 $14.94SFR 570-072-011 $14.94SFR 570-072-012 $14.94SFR 570-072-013 $14.94SFR 570-072-014 $14.94SFR 570-081-001 $14.94SFR 570-081-002 $14.94SFR 570-081-003 $14.94SFR 570-081-004 $14.94SFR 570-081-005 $14.94SFR 570-081-007 $14.94SFR 570-081-008 $14.94SFR 570-081-009 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-081-010 $14.94SFR 570-081-011 $14.94SFR 570-081-012 $14.94SFR 570-081-013 $14.94SFR 570-082-001 $14.94SFR 570-082-002 $14.94SFR 570-082-003 $14.94SFR 570-082-004 $14.94SFR 570-082-005 $14.94SFR 570-082-006 $14.94SFR 570-082-007 $14.94SFR 570-082-008 $14.94SFR 570-082-009 $14.94SFR 570-082-010 $14.94SFR 570-082-011 $14.94SFR 570-082-012 $14.94SFR 570-082-013 $14.94SFR 570-082-014 $14.94SFR 570-082-015 $14.94SFR 570-082-016 $14.94SFR 570-091-001 $14.94SFR 570-091-002 $14.94SFR 570-091-003 $14.94SFR 570-091-004 $14.94SFR 570-091-005 $14.94SFR 570-091-006 $14.94SFR 570-091-007 $14.94SFR 570-092-001 $14.94SFR 570-092-002 $29.88MFR2 570-092-003 $14.94SFR 570-092-004 $14.94SFR 570-092-005 $14.94SFR 570-092-006 $14.94SFR 570-092-007 $14.94SFR 570-092-008 $14.94SFR 570-092-009 $14.94SFR 570-092-010 $14.94SFR 570-092-011 $14.94SFR 570-092-012 $14.94SFR 570-092-013 $14.94SFR 570-092-014 $14.94SFR 570-093-001 $14.94SFR 570-093-002 $14.94SFR 570-093-003 $14.94SFR 570-093-004 $14.94SFR 570-093-005 $14.94SFR 570-093-006 $14.94SFR 570-093-007 $14.94SFR 570-093-008 $14.94SFR 570-093-009 $14.94SFR 570-093-010 $14.94SFR 570-093-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-093-012 $14.94SFR 570-093-013 $14.94SFR 570-100-002 $7.46VSFR 570-100-003 $14.94SFR 570-100-005 $14.94SFR 570-100-008 $14.94SFR 570-100-009 $14.94SFR 570-100-010 $14.94SFR 570-100-011 $29.88MFR2 570-100-012 $14.94SFR 570-100-013 $14.94SFR 570-100-014 $14.94SFR 570-100-015 $14.94SFR 570-100-016 $14.94SFR 570-100-017 $14.94SFR 570-100-018 $14.94SFR 570-100-019 $14.94SFR 570-100-020 $74.70COM 570-100-022 $14.94SFR 570-100-023 $14.94SFR 570-100-024 $14.94SFR 570-110-001 $14.94SFR 570-110-002 $14.94SFR 570-110-003 $14.94SFR 570-110-004 $14.94SFR 570-110-005 $14.94SFR 570-110-006 $14.94SFR 570-110-007 $14.94SFR 570-110-008 $14.94SFR 570-110-009 $29.88MFR2 570-110-010 $14.94SFR 570-110-011 $14.94SFR 570-110-012 $14.94SFR 570-110-013 $14.94SFR 570-110-014 $14.94SFR 570-110-015 $14.94SFR 570-110-016 $14.94SFR 570-121-001 $14.94SFR 570-121-002 $14.94SFR 570-121-003 $14.94SFR 570-121-004 $14.94SFR 570-121-005 $14.94SFR 570-121-006 $14.94SFR 570-121-007 $14.94SFR 570-121-008 $14.94SFR 570-121-009 $14.94SFR 570-121-010 $14.94SFR 570-121-011 $14.94SFR 570-121-014 $14.94SFR 570-121-015 $14.94SFR 570-121-016 $14.94SFR 570-121-017 $14.94SFR - 247 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-121-018 $14.94SFR 570-121-019 $14.94SFR 570-121-020 $14.94SFR 570-122-001 $14.94SFR 570-122-002 $14.94SFR 570-122-003 $14.94SFR 570-122-004 $14.94SFR 570-122-005 $14.94SFR 570-122-011 $14.94SFR 570-122-012 $14.94SFR 570-122-013 $14.94SFR 570-122-014 $14.94SFR 570-122-015 $14.94SFR 570-122-020 $14.94SFR 570-122-025 $14.94SFR 570-130-002 $14.94SFR 570-130-003 $14.94SFR 570-130-004 $14.94SFR 570-130-005 $14.94SFR 570-130-006 $14.94SFR 570-130-007 $14.94SFR 570-130-008 $14.94SFR 570-130-009 $14.94SFR 570-130-010 $14.94SFR 570-130-011 $14.94SFR 570-130-012 $14.94SFR 570-130-013 $14.94SFR 570-130-014 $14.94SFR 570-130-015 $14.94SFR 570-130-016 $14.94SFR 570-130-017 $14.94SFR 570-130-018 $14.94SFR 570-130-019 $14.94SFR 570-130-020 $14.94SFR 570-130-021 $29.88MFR2 570-130-022 $14.94SFR 570-130-023 $14.94SFR 570-130-024 $29.88MFR2 570-130-025 $14.94SFR 570-130-027 $14.94SFR 570-130-031 $7.46VSFR 570-130-032 $14.94SFR 570-130-033 $14.94SFR 570-141-001 $14.94SFR 570-141-002 $14.94SFR 570-141-003 $14.94SFR 570-141-004 $14.94SFR 570-141-005 $14.94SFR 570-141-006 $14.94SFR 570-142-001 $14.94SFR 570-142-002 $14.94SFR 570-142-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-142-004 $14.94SFR 570-142-005 $14.94SFR 570-142-006 $14.94SFR 570-142-007 $14.94SFR 570-142-008 $14.94SFR 570-142-009 $14.94SFR 570-142-010 $14.94SFR 570-142-011 $14.94SFR 570-142-012 $14.94SFR 570-142-013 $14.94SFR 570-142-014 $14.94SFR 570-142-015 $14.94SFR 570-142-016 $14.94SFR 570-142-017 $14.94SFR 570-142-019 $14.94SFR 570-142-020 $14.94SFR 570-142-023 $14.94SFR 570-142-024 $14.94SFR 570-142-025 $29.88MFR2 570-142-026 $14.94SFR 570-142-027 $14.94SFR 570-142-028 $14.94SFR 570-142-029 $14.94SFR 570-151-001 $14.94SFR 570-151-002 $14.94SFR 570-151-003 $14.94SFR 570-151-004 $14.94SFR 570-151-005 $14.94SFR 570-151-006 $14.94SFR 570-151-007 $14.94SFR 570-151-008 $14.94SFR 570-151-009 $14.94SFR 570-151-010 $14.94SFR 570-151-011 $14.94SFR 570-151-012 $14.94SFR 570-151-013 $14.94SFR 570-151-014 $14.94SFR 570-151-015 $14.94SFR 570-151-016 $14.94SFR 570-151-017 $14.94SFR 570-151-018 $14.94SFR 570-151-019 $14.94SFR 570-151-020 $14.94SFR 570-151-021 $14.94SFR 570-151-022 $14.94SFR 570-151-023 $14.94SFR 570-151-024 $14.94SFR 570-151-025 $14.94SFR 570-151-026 $14.94SFR 570-151-027 $14.94SFR 570-151-028 $14.94SFR 570-151-029 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-152-001 $14.94SFR 570-152-002 $14.94SFR 570-152-003 $14.94SFR 570-152-004 $14.94SFR 570-152-005 $14.94SFR 570-152-006 $14.94SFR 570-152-007 $14.94SFR 570-152-008 $14.94SFR 570-152-009 $14.94SFR 570-152-010 $14.94SFR 570-152-011 $14.94SFR 570-152-012 $14.94SFR 570-152-013 $14.94SFR 570-152-014 $14.94SFR 570-152-015 $14.94SFR 570-152-016 $14.94SFR 570-152-017 $14.94SFR 570-161-001 $14.94SFR 570-161-002 $14.94SFR 570-161-003 $14.94SFR 570-161-004 $14.94SFR 570-161-008 $14.94SFR 570-161-009 $7.46VSFR 570-162-001 $14.94SFR 570-162-002 $14.94SFR 570-162-003 $14.94SFR 570-162-004 $14.94SFR 570-162-005 $29.88MFR2 570-162-006 $14.94SFR 570-162-007 $14.94SFR 570-162-008 $14.94SFR 570-162-009 $14.94SFR 570-162-010 $14.94SFR 570-162-011 $14.94SFR 570-162-012 $14.94SFR 570-162-013 $14.94SFR 570-162-014 $14.94SFR 570-162-015 $14.94SFR 570-162-016 $14.94SFR 570-162-017 $14.94SFR 570-162-018 $14.94SFR 570-162-019 $14.94SFR 570-162-020 $14.94SFR 570-162-021 $14.94SFR 570-162-022 $14.94SFR 570-162-023 $14.94SFR 570-162-024 $14.94SFR 570-162-025 $14.94SFR 570-162-026 $14.94SFR 570-162-027 $14.94SFR 570-162-028 $14.94SFR 570-171-001 $14.94SFR - 248 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-171-002 $14.94SFR 570-171-003 $14.94SFR 570-171-004 $14.94SFR 570-171-005 $14.94SFR 570-171-006 $14.94SFR 570-171-007 $14.94SFR 570-171-008 $14.94SFR 570-171-009 $14.94SFR 570-171-010 $14.94SFR 570-171-011 $14.94SFR 570-171-012 $29.88MFR2 570-171-013 $14.94SFR 570-171-014 $14.94SFR 570-171-015 $14.94SFR 570-171-016 $14.94SFR 570-172-001 $14.94SFR 570-172-002 $14.94SFR 570-172-003 $14.94SFR 570-172-004 $14.94SFR 570-172-005 $14.94SFR 570-172-006 $14.94SFR 570-172-007 $14.94SFR 570-172-008 $14.94SFR 570-172-009 $14.94SFR 570-172-010 $14.94SFR 570-172-011 $14.94SFR 570-172-012 $14.94SFR 570-172-013 $14.94SFR 570-172-014 $14.94SFR 570-173-002 $14.94SFR 570-173-003 $14.94SFR 570-173-004 $14.94SFR 570-173-005 $14.94SFR 570-173-006 $14.94SFR 570-173-007 $14.94SFR 570-173-008 $14.94SFR 570-173-009 $14.94SFR 570-180-001 $14.94SFR 570-180-002 $14.94SFR 570-180-003 $14.94SFR 570-180-004 $14.94SFR 570-180-005 $14.94SFR 570-180-006 $14.94SFR 570-180-007 $14.94SFR 570-180-008 $14.94SFR 570-180-009 $14.94SFR 570-180-010 $14.94SFR 570-180-011 $14.94SFR 570-180-012 $14.94SFR 570-180-013 $14.94SFR 570-180-014 $14.94SFR 570-180-015 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-180-016 $14.94SFR 570-180-017 $14.94SFR 570-180-018 $14.94SFR 570-180-019 $14.94SFR 570-180-020 $14.94SFR 570-180-021 $14.94SFR 570-180-022 $14.94SFR 570-180-023 $14.94SFR 570-180-024 $14.94SFR 570-180-025 $14.94SFR 570-180-027 $14.94SFR 570-180-028 $14.94SFR 570-191-001 $14.94SFR 570-191-002 $14.94SFR 570-191-003 $14.94SFR 570-191-004 $14.94SFR 570-191-005 $14.94SFR 570-191-006 $14.94SFR 570-191-007 $14.94SFR 570-191-009 $14.94SFR 570-191-010 $14.94SFR 570-191-011 $14.94SFR 570-191-012 $14.94SFR 570-191-013 $14.94SFR 570-191-014 $14.94SFR 570-192-001 $14.94SFR 570-192-002 $14.94SFR 570-192-003 $14.94SFR 570-192-004 $14.94SFR 570-192-005 $14.94SFR 570-192-006 $14.94SFR 570-192-007 $14.94SFR 570-192-008 $14.94SFR 570-192-009 $14.94SFR 570-192-010 $14.94SFR 570-192-011 $14.94SFR 570-192-012 $14.94SFR 570-192-013 $14.94SFR 570-192-014 $14.94SFR 570-192-015 $14.94SFR 570-192-016 $14.94SFR 570-192-017 $14.94SFR 570-192-018 $14.94SFR 570-192-019 $14.94SFR 570-192-020 $14.94SFR 570-192-021 $14.94SFR 570-192-022 $14.94SFR 570-192-023 $14.94SFR 570-192-024 $14.94SFR 570-192-025 $14.94SFR 570-192-026 $14.94SFR 570-192-027 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-201-001 $14.94SFR 570-201-002 $14.94SFR 570-201-003 $14.94SFR 570-201-004 $14.94SFR 570-201-005 $14.94SFR 570-201-006 $14.94SFR 570-201-007 $14.94SFR 570-201-008 $14.94SFR 570-202-002 $14.94SFR 570-202-003 $14.94SFR 570-202-004 $14.94SFR 570-202-005 $14.94SFR 570-203-001 $14.94SFR 570-203-002 $14.94SFR 570-203-003 $14.94SFR 570-203-004 $14.94SFR 570-203-005 $14.94SFR 570-203-006 $29.88MFR2 570-203-007 $14.94SFR 570-203-008 $14.94SFR 570-203-009 $14.94SFR 570-203-010 $14.94SFR 570-203-011 $14.94SFR 570-203-012 $14.94SFR 570-203-013 $14.94SFR 570-203-014 $14.94SFR 570-221-001 $14.94SFR 570-221-002 $14.94SFR 570-221-003 $14.94SFR 570-221-004 $14.94SFR 570-221-005 $14.94SFR 570-221-006 $14.94SFR 570-221-007 $14.94SFR 570-221-008 $14.94SFR 570-221-009 $14.94SFR 570-221-010 $14.94SFR 570-221-011 $14.94SFR 570-221-012 $14.94SFR 570-221-013 $14.94SFR 570-221-014 $14.94SFR 570-221-015 $14.94SFR 570-222-001 $14.94SFR 570-222-002 $14.94SFR 570-222-003 $14.94SFR 570-222-004 $14.94SFR 570-222-005 $14.94SFR 570-222-006 $14.94SFR 570-222-007 $14.94SFR 570-222-008 $14.94SFR 570-222-009 $14.94SFR 570-222-010 $14.94SFR 570-222-011 $14.94SFR - 249 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-222-012 $14.94SFR 570-222-013 $14.94SFR 570-222-014 $14.94SFR 570-222-015 $14.94SFR 570-222-016 $14.94SFR 570-222-017 $14.94SFR 570-222-018 $14.94SFR 570-222-019 $14.94SFR 570-222-020 $14.94SFR 570-222-021 $14.94SFR 570-222-022 $14.94SFR 570-222-023 $14.94SFR 570-222-024 $14.94SFR 570-222-025 $14.94SFR 570-222-026 $14.94SFR 570-222-027 $14.94SFR 570-223-001 $14.94SFR 570-223-002 $14.94SFR 570-223-003 $14.94SFR 570-223-004 $29.88MFR2 570-223-005 $14.94SFR 570-223-006 $14.94SFR 570-231-001 $14.94SFR 570-231-002 $14.94SFR 570-231-003 $14.94SFR 570-231-004 $14.94SFR 570-231-005 $14.94SFR 570-231-006 $14.94SFR 570-231-007 $14.94SFR 570-231-008 $14.94SFR 570-231-009 $14.94SFR 570-231-010 $14.94SFR 570-231-011 $14.94SFR 570-231-012 $29.88MFR2 570-231-013 $14.94SFR 570-231-014 $14.94SFR 570-231-015 $14.94SFR 570-231-018 $14.94SFR 570-231-019 $14.94SFR 570-232-001 $29.88MFR2 570-232-002 $14.94SFR 570-232-003 $14.94SFR 570-232-004 $14.94SFR 570-232-005 $14.94SFR 570-232-006 $14.94SFR 570-232-007 $14.94SFR 570-232-008 $14.94SFR 570-232-009 $14.94SFR 570-232-010 $14.94SFR 570-232-011 $14.94SFR 570-232-012 $14.94SFR 570-251-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-251-007 $14.94SFR 570-251-008 $14.94SFR 570-251-009 $14.94SFR 570-251-010 $14.94SFR 570-251-011 $14.94SFR 570-251-012 $14.94SFR 570-251-015 $14.94SFR 570-251-016 $14.94SFR 570-251-017 $14.94SFR 570-251-018 $7.46VSFR 570-251-020 $7.46VSFR 570-251-021 $7.46VSFR 570-252-002 $14.94SFR 570-252-003 $14.94SFR 570-252-004 $14.94SFR 570-252-005 $14.94SFR 570-252-006 $14.94SFR 570-252-007 $14.94SFR 570-252-008 $14.94SFR 570-252-009 $14.94SFR 570-252-010 $14.94SFR 570-252-011 $14.94SFR 570-252-012 $14.94SFR 570-252-013 $14.94SFR 570-252-014 $14.94SFR 570-252-015 $14.94SFR 570-252-016 $14.94SFR 570-252-017 $14.94SFR 570-252-018 $14.94SFR 570-252-019 $14.94SFR 570-252-020 $14.94SFR 570-252-021 $14.94SFR 570-252-022 $14.94SFR 570-252-023 $14.94SFR 570-252-024 $14.94SFR 570-252-025 $14.94SFR 570-252-026 $14.94SFR 570-252-027 $14.94SFR 570-252-028 $14.94SFR 570-252-029 $14.94SFR 570-252-030 $14.94SFR 570-252-031 $14.94SFR 570-253-004 $7.46VSFR 570-253-005 $7.46VSFR 570-253-006 $7.46VSFR 570-253-010 $14.94SFR 570-253-011 $14.94SFR 570-253-012 $7.46VSFR 570-253-013 $14.94SFR 570-253-014 $14.94SFR 570-253-015 $14.94SFR 570-253-016 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 570-253-017 $14.94SFR 570-253-018 $14.94SFR 570-253-019 $14.94SFR 570-253-020 $14.94SFR 570-253-021 $14.94SFR 570-253-022 $14.94SFR 570-253-023 $7.46VSFR 570-253-024 $7.46VSFR 570-253-025 $7.46VSFR 570-253-026 $14.94SFR 570-253-028 $14.94SFR 570-253-029 $14.94SFR 570-253-031 $14.94SFR 570-253-032 $14.94SFR 570-253-033 $14.94SFR 570-253-035 $14.94SFR 570-253-036 $14.94SFR 570-253-037 $7.46VSFR 570-261-001 $14.94SFR 570-261-002 $14.94SFR 570-261-003 $14.94SFR 570-262-013 $14.94SFR 570-262-014 $14.94SFR 570-262-015 $14.94SFR 570-262-020 $14.94SFR 570-262-021 $14.94SFR 570-262-022 $14.94SFR 570-262-025 $14.94SFR 570-262-026 $14.94SFR 570-262-029 $14.94SFR 570-262-030 $14.94SFR 570-262-032 $14.94SFR 570-262-033 $14.94SFR 570-262-034 $14.94SFR 570-262-035 $14.94SFR 570-262-036 $14.94SFR 570-262-037 $14.94SFR 570-262-038 $14.94SFR 571-010-001 $14.94SFR 571-010-002 $14.94SFR 571-010-003 $14.94SFR 571-010-004 $14.94SFR 571-010-005 $14.94SFR 571-010-006 $14.94SFR 571-010-007 $14.94SFR 571-010-008 $14.94SFR 571-010-009 $14.94SFR 571-010-010 $14.94SFR 571-010-012 $14.94SFR 571-010-013 $14.94SFR 571-010-014 $14.94SFR 571-010-015 $14.94SFR - 250 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-010-016 $14.94SFR 571-010-017 $14.94SFR 571-010-018 $14.94SFR 571-010-019 $14.94SFR 571-010-020 $14.94SFR 571-010-021 $14.94SFR 571-010-022 $14.94SFR 571-010-023 $14.94SFR 571-021-001 $14.94SFR 571-021-002 $14.94SFR 571-021-003 $14.94SFR 571-021-004 $14.94SFR 571-021-005 $14.94SFR 571-021-006 $14.94SFR 571-021-007 $14.94SFR 571-021-008 $14.94SFR 571-021-010 $14.94SFR 571-021-011 $14.94SFR 571-021-014 $29.88MFR2 571-021-015 $14.94SFR 571-021-016 $14.94SFR 571-021-017 $14.94SFR 571-021-018 $14.94SFR 571-021-019 $14.94SFR 571-021-020 $14.94SFR 571-021-021 $14.94SFR 571-021-022 $14.94SFR 571-021-023 $14.94SFR 571-021-024 $14.94SFR 571-021-026 $14.94SFR 571-021-030 $14.94SFR 571-021-032 $14.94SFR 571-021-033 $14.94SFR 571-021-034 $14.94SFR 571-022-001 $14.94SFR 571-022-003 $14.94SFR 571-022-004 $14.94SFR 571-022-005 $14.94SFR 571-022-006 $14.94SFR 571-022-007 $14.94SFR 571-022-008 $14.94SFR 571-022-009 $14.94SFR 571-022-010 $14.94SFR 571-022-011 $14.94SFR 571-022-012 $14.94SFR 571-022-013 $14.94SFR 571-030-001 $14.94SFR 571-030-002 $14.94SFR 571-030-003 $14.94SFR 571-030-005 $14.94SFR 571-030-006 $14.94SFR 571-030-007 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-030-008 $14.94SFR 571-030-009 $29.88MFR2 571-030-010 $14.94SFR 571-030-011 $29.88MFR2 571-030-012 $14.94SFR 571-030-013 $14.94SFR 571-030-014 $14.94SFR 571-030-015 $14.94SFR 571-030-017 $14.94SFR 571-030-018 $14.94SFR 571-030-019 $7.46VSFR 571-040-001 $14.94SFR 571-040-002 $14.94SFR 571-040-003 $14.94SFR 571-040-004 $14.94SFR 571-040-005 $14.94SFR 571-040-006 $74.70COM 571-040-007 $74.70COM 571-040-008 $14.94SFR 571-040-011 $14.94SFR 571-040-012 $29.88MFR2 571-050-002 $14.94SFR 571-050-003 $14.94SFR 571-050-009 $74.70COM 571-050-011 $14.94SFR 571-050-012 $14.94SFR 571-050-013 $14.94SFR 571-050-014 $14.94SFR 571-050-015 $14.94SFR 571-050-017 $14.94SFR 571-050-018 $14.94SFR 571-050-019 $14.94SFR 571-050-021 $74.70COM 571-050-022 $14.94SFR 571-050-023 $74.70MFR5 571-060-002 $14.94SFR 571-060-003 $14.94SFR 571-060-004 $44.82MFR 571-060-005 $29.88MFR2 571-060-006 $29.88MFR2 571-060-007 $44.82MFR 571-060-008 $44.82MFR 571-060-009 $14.94SFR 571-060-010 $14.94SFR 571-060-011 $14.94SFR 571-070-001 $14.94SFR 571-070-002 $14.94SFR 571-070-003 $14.94SFR 571-070-006 $14.94SFR 571-070-009 $14.94SFR 571-070-010 $7.46VSFR 571-070-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-070-012 $29.88MFR2 571-070-013 $14.94SFR 571-070-014 $14.94SFR 571-070-015 $14.94SFR 571-070-016 $14.94SFR 571-070-017 $7.46VSFR 571-070-018 $29.88MFR2 571-070-019 $14.94SFR 571-080-001 $14.94SFR 571-080-002 $14.94SFR 571-080-003 $14.94SFR 571-080-004 $14.94SFR 571-080-006 $14.94SFR 571-080-007 $14.94SFR 571-080-008 $14.94SFR 571-080-009 $14.94SFR 571-080-010 $14.94SFR 571-080-011 $14.94SFR 571-080-012 $14.94SFR 571-080-013 $14.94SFR 571-080-014 $14.94SFR 571-080-015 $14.94SFR 571-080-016 $14.94SFR 571-080-017 $14.94SFR 571-080-018 $14.94SFR 571-080-019 $14.94SFR 571-080-020 $14.94SFR 571-080-021 $14.94SFR 571-080-022 $14.94SFR 571-080-025 $14.94SFR 571-090-001 $14.94SFR 571-090-002 $14.94SFR 571-090-003 $14.94SFR 571-090-004 $14.94SFR 571-090-005 $14.94SFR 571-090-006 $14.94SFR 571-090-007 $7.46VSFR 571-090-008 $14.94SFR 571-090-011 $14.94SFR 571-090-012 $14.94SFR 571-090-013 $14.94SFR 571-090-014 $14.94SFR 571-090-015 $14.94SFR 571-090-016 $14.94SFR 571-090-017 $14.94SFR 571-090-019 $14.94SFR 571-100-001 $14.94SFR 571-100-002 $14.94SFR 571-100-003 $14.94SFR 571-100-004 $14.94SFR 571-100-005 $14.94SFR 571-100-006 $14.94SFR - 251 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-100-007 $14.94SFR 571-100-008 $14.94SFR 571-100-009 $14.94SFR 571-100-010 $14.94SFR 571-100-011 $14.94SFR 571-100-012 $14.94SFR 571-100-013 $14.94SFR 571-100-014 $14.94SFR 571-100-015 $14.94SFR 571-100-016 $14.94SFR 571-100-017 $14.94SFR 571-110-001 $14.94SFR 571-110-002 $14.94SFR 571-110-003 $14.94SFR 571-110-004 $14.94SFR 571-110-007 $14.94SFR 571-110-008 $14.94SFR 571-110-009 $14.94SFR 571-110-010 $14.94SFR 571-110-011 $14.94SFR 571-110-012 $14.94SFR 571-110-013 $14.94SFR 571-110-014 $14.94SFR 571-110-015 $14.94SFR 571-110-016 $14.94SFR 571-110-017 $14.94SFR 571-110-019 $14.94SFR 571-110-020 $14.94SFR 571-110-021 $14.94SFR 571-120-001 $14.94SFR 571-120-002 $14.94SFR 571-120-003 $14.94SFR 571-120-005 $14.94SFR 571-120-006 $14.94SFR 571-120-007 $29.88MFR2 571-120-008 $14.94SFR 571-120-010 $14.94SFR 571-120-011 $14.94SFR 571-120-012 $14.94SFR 571-120-013 $14.94SFR 571-120-014 $14.94SFR 571-120-015 $14.94SFR 571-120-016 $14.94SFR 571-120-017 $14.94SFR 571-120-018 $14.94SFR 571-120-019 $14.94SFR 571-120-020 $14.94SFR 571-120-021 $14.94SFR 571-120-022 $14.94SFR 571-120-023 $14.94SFR 571-120-024 $14.94SFR 571-120-025 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-120-026 $14.94SFR 571-120-027 $14.94SFR 571-120-028 $14.94SFR 571-130-001 $14.94SFR 571-130-002 $14.94SFR 571-130-003 $14.94SFR 571-130-004 $14.94SFR 571-130-005 $29.88MFR2 571-130-006 $14.94SFR 571-130-007 $14.94SFR 571-130-008 $14.94SFR 571-130-009 $14.94SFR 571-130-010 $14.94SFR 571-130-011 $14.94SFR 571-130-012 $14.94SFR 571-130-013 $14.94SFR 571-130-014 $14.94SFR 571-130-015 $14.94SFR 571-130-016 $14.94SFR 571-130-017 $14.94SFR 571-130-018 $14.94SFR 571-130-019 $14.94SFR 571-130-020 $44.82MFR 571-130-021 $14.94SFR 571-130-022 $44.82MFR 571-130-023 $14.94SFR 571-130-024 $14.94SFR 571-130-025 $14.94SFR 571-140-001 $29.88MFR2 571-140-002 $29.88MFR2 571-140-003 $29.88MFR2 571-140-004 $14.94SFR 571-140-005 $14.94SFR 571-140-006 $14.94SFR 571-140-007 $14.94SFR 571-140-008 $14.94SFR 571-140-009 $29.88MFR2 571-140-010 $14.94SFR 571-140-011 $14.94SFR 571-140-012 $14.94SFR 571-140-013 $14.94SFR 571-140-014 $14.94SFR 571-140-015 $44.82MFR 571-140-016 $14.94SFR 571-140-017 $14.94SFR 571-140-018 $14.94SFR 571-140-022 $14.94SFR 571-140-023 $14.94SFR 571-140-024 $14.94SFR 571-140-025 $14.94SFR 571-140-026 $14.94SFR 571-140-031 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-140-032 $14.94SFR 571-150-001 $14.94SFR 571-150-002 $29.88MFR2 571-150-003 $14.94SFR 571-150-005 $14.94SFR 571-150-008 $14.94SFR 571-150-010 $14.94SFR 571-150-011 $29.88MFR2 571-150-012 $14.94SFR 571-150-013 $14.94SFR 571-150-015 $7.46VSFR 571-150-017 $29.88MFR2 571-150-019 $14.94SFR 571-150-020 $14.94SFR 571-150-021 $14.94SFR 571-150-022 $29.88MFR2 571-150-023 $7.46VSFR 571-160-001 $14.94SFR 571-160-002 $14.94SFR 571-160-003 $14.94SFR 571-160-004 $14.94SFR 571-160-006 $14.94SFR 571-160-012 $14.94SFR 571-160-013 $14.94SFR 571-160-014 $14.94SFR 571-160-017 $14.94SFR 571-160-019 $7.46VSFR 571-160-020 $14.94SFR 571-170-001 $14.94SFR 571-170-002 $14.94SFR 571-170-004 $14.94SFR 571-170-005 $14.94SFR 571-170-006 $14.94SFR 571-170-007 $14.94SFR 571-170-008 $14.94SFR 571-170-010 $14.94SFR 571-170-014 $14.94SFR 571-170-015 $14.94SFR 571-170-016 $14.94SFR 571-170-017 $14.94SFR 571-170-022 $14.94SFR 571-170-023 $14.94SFR 571-170-031 $14.94SFR 571-170-032 $14.94SFR 571-170-034 $14.94SFR 571-170-035 $14.94SFR 571-170-036 $14.94SFR 571-170-037 $7.46VSFR 571-170-038 $14.94SFR 571-180-001 $14.94SFR 571-180-002 $14.94SFR 571-180-003 $14.94SFR - 252 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-180-004 $14.94SFR 571-180-005 $14.94SFR 571-180-006 $14.94SFR 571-180-007 $14.94SFR 571-180-009 $14.94SFR 571-180-010 $14.94SFR 571-180-011 $14.94SFR 571-180-012 $14.94SFR 571-180-013 $14.94SFR 571-180-014 $14.94SFR 571-180-017 $14.94SFR 571-190-001 $14.94SFR 571-190-002 $14.94SFR 571-190-003 $14.94SFR 571-190-004 $29.88MFR2 571-190-006 $14.94SFR 571-190-007 $14.94SFR 571-190-008 $44.82MFR 571-190-009 $14.94SFR 571-190-010 $14.94SFR 571-190-011 $14.94SFR 571-190-012 $14.94SFR 571-190-013 $14.94SFR 571-190-014 $14.94SFR 571-190-015 $14.94SFR 571-190-016 $14.94SFR 571-190-018 $14.94SFR 571-190-019 $14.94SFR 571-200-001 $14.94SFR 571-200-002 $14.94SFR 571-200-003 $14.94SFR 571-200-004 $14.94SFR 571-200-005 $14.94SFR 571-200-006 $14.94SFR 571-200-007 $14.94SFR 571-200-008 $14.94SFR 571-200-009 $14.94SFR 571-200-010 $14.94SFR 571-200-011 $14.94SFR 571-200-012 $14.94SFR 571-200-013 $14.94SFR 571-200-014 $14.94SFR 571-200-015 $14.94SFR 571-200-016 $14.94SFR 571-200-017 $14.94SFR 571-211-004 $14.94SFR 571-211-005 $14.94SFR 571-211-006 $14.94SFR 571-211-007 $14.94SFR 571-211-008 $14.94SFR 571-211-009 $14.94SFR 571-211-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-211-012 $14.94SFR 571-211-013 $44.82MFR 571-212-001 $14.94SFR 571-212-002 $14.94SFR 571-212-004 $14.94SFR 571-212-005 $14.94SFR 571-212-006 $14.94SFR 571-212-007 $14.94SFR 571-212-008 $14.94SFR 571-212-009 $14.94SFR 571-212-010 $14.94SFR 571-212-011 $14.94SFR 571-221-001 $14.94SFR 571-221-002 $14.94SFR 571-221-004 $14.94SFR 571-221-005 $14.94SFR 571-221-006 $14.94SFR 571-221-007 $14.94SFR 571-221-008 $14.94SFR 571-221-009 $14.94SFR 571-221-010 $14.94SFR 571-221-011 $14.94SFR 571-221-012 $14.94SFR 571-222-001 $14.94SFR 571-222-002 $14.94SFR 571-222-003 $14.94SFR 571-222-004 $14.94SFR 571-222-005 $14.94SFR 571-231-001 $14.94SFR 571-231-002 $14.94SFR 571-231-003 $14.94SFR 571-231-004 $14.94SFR 571-231-005 $14.94SFR 571-231-006 $14.94SFR 571-232-001 $14.94SFR 571-232-002 $14.94SFR 571-232-003 $14.94SFR 571-232-004 $14.94SFR 571-232-005 $14.94SFR 571-232-006 $14.94SFR 571-240-001 $14.94SFR 571-240-002 $14.94SFR 571-240-003 $14.94SFR 571-240-004 $14.94SFR 571-240-005 $14.94SFR 571-240-006 $14.94SFR 571-240-007 $14.94SFR 571-240-008 $14.94SFR 571-240-009 $14.94SFR 571-240-010 $14.94SFR 571-240-011 $14.94SFR 571-240-012 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-240-013 $14.94SFR 571-240-014 $14.94SFR 571-240-018 $7.46VSFR 571-240-019 $14.94SFR 571-240-022 $14.94SFR 571-240-023 $14.94SFR 571-240-024 $14.94SFR 571-240-027 $14.94SFR 571-250-003 $14.94SFR 571-250-004 $14.94SFR 571-250-005 $14.94SFR 571-250-006 $14.94SFR 571-250-007 $14.94SFR 571-250-008 $14.94SFR 571-250-009 $14.94SFR 571-250-010 $14.94SFR 571-250-013 $14.94SFR 571-250-014 $14.94SFR 571-250-015 $14.94SFR 571-250-016 $14.94SFR 571-250-017 $14.94SFR 571-250-018 $14.94SFR 571-250-019 $14.94SFR 571-250-020 $29.88MFR2 571-250-021 $14.94SFR 571-250-022 $14.94SFR 571-250-023 $14.94SFR 571-250-024 $14.94SFR 571-250-025 $14.94SFR 571-250-026 $29.88MFR2 571-250-027 $14.94SFR 571-250-028 $14.94SFR 571-250-029 $14.94SFR 571-250-030 $14.94SFR 571-250-031 $14.94SFR 571-250-032 $14.94SFR 571-250-033 $14.94SFR 571-250-034 $14.94SFR 571-260-001 $14.94SFR 571-260-002 $14.94SFR 571-260-003 $14.94SFR 571-260-004 $14.94SFR 571-260-005 $14.94SFR 571-260-006 $14.94SFR 571-260-008 $14.94SFR 571-260-013 $14.94SFR 571-260-014 $14.94SFR 571-260-015 $14.94SFR 571-260-016 $14.94SFR 571-270-001 $14.94SFR 571-270-002 $14.94SFR 571-270-003 $14.94SFR - 253 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-270-004 $14.94SFR 571-270-005 $14.94SFR 571-270-006 $14.94SFR 571-270-007 $14.94SFR 571-270-012 $14.94SFR 571-270-013 $14.94SFR 571-270-014 $14.94SFR 571-270-015 $14.94SFR 571-270-018 $14.94SFR 571-270-019 $14.94SFR 571-270-020 $14.94SFR 571-270-021 $14.94SFR 571-270-022 $14.94SFR 571-270-023 $14.94SFR 571-270-024 $14.94SFR 571-270-025 $14.94SFR 571-270-026 $14.94SFR 571-270-027 $14.94SFR 571-270-029 $14.94SFR 571-270-030 $14.94SFR 571-270-031 $14.94SFR 571-270-032 $14.94SFR 571-270-033 $14.94SFR 571-280-002 $14.94SFR 571-280-003 $14.94SFR 571-280-004 $29.88MFR2 571-280-005 $14.94SFR 571-280-008 $14.94SFR 571-280-009 $14.94SFR 571-280-010 $14.94SFR 571-280-012 $14.94SFR 571-280-013 $14.94SFR 571-280-014 $14.94SFR 571-280-015 $14.94SFR 571-280-016 $14.94SFR 571-280-017 $14.94SFR 571-280-018 $14.94SFR 571-280-019 $14.94SFR 571-290-001 $14.94SFR 571-290-002 $14.94SFR 571-290-003 $14.94SFR 571-290-004 $14.94SFR 571-290-005 $29.88MFR2 571-290-006 $14.94SFR 571-290-007 $14.94SFR 571-290-008 $14.94SFR 571-290-009 $29.88MFR2 571-290-010 $14.94SFR 571-290-011 $14.94SFR 571-290-012 $14.94SFR 571-290-013 $14.94SFR 571-290-014 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-290-015 $14.94SFR 571-290-016 $14.94SFR 571-290-017 $14.94SFR 571-290-018 $14.94SFR 571-290-019 $14.94SFR 571-290-020 $14.94SFR 571-300-001 $74.70MFR5 571-300-002 $14.94SFR 571-300-003 $14.94SFR 571-300-004 $14.94SFR 571-300-005 $14.94SFR 571-300-006 $14.94SFR 571-300-007 $14.94SFR 571-300-008 $14.94SFR 571-300-009 $14.94SFR 571-300-010 $14.94SFR 571-300-011 $14.94SFR 571-300-012 $14.94SFR 571-300-013 $14.94SFR 571-300-014 $29.88MFR2 571-300-015 $14.94SFR 571-300-016 $14.94SFR 571-300-017 $14.94SFR 571-300-018 $14.94SFR 571-300-019 $14.94SFR 571-300-020 $14.94SFR 571-300-021 $14.94SFR 571-300-022 $14.94SFR 571-300-023 $14.94SFR 571-300-024 $14.94SFR 571-300-025 $14.94SFR 571-300-026 $14.94SFR 571-300-027 $14.94SFR 571-300-028 $14.94SFR 571-300-029 $14.94SFR 571-300-030 $14.94SFR 571-300-031 $14.94SFR 571-300-032 $14.94SFR 571-311-002 $14.94SFR 571-311-003 $14.94SFR 571-311-004 $14.94SFR 571-311-005 $14.94SFR 571-311-006 $14.94SFR 571-311-007 $14.94SFR 571-311-008 $14.94SFR 571-311-009 $14.94SFR 571-311-010 $14.94SFR 571-311-011 $14.94SFR 571-311-012 $14.94SFR 571-311-013 $14.94SFR 571-311-014 $14.94SFR 571-311-015 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-311-016 $14.94SFR 571-311-017 $14.94SFR 571-311-018 $14.94SFR 571-311-019 $14.94SFR 571-311-020 $14.94SFR 571-311-021 $14.94SFR 571-311-022 $14.94SFR 571-311-023 $14.94SFR 571-311-024 $14.94SFR 571-311-025 $14.94SFR 571-311-026 $14.94SFR 571-311-027 $14.94SFR 571-311-028 $14.94SFR 571-311-029 $14.94SFR 571-311-030 $14.94SFR 571-311-031 $14.94SFR 571-312-001 $74.70COM 571-312-003 $14.94SFR 571-312-004 $14.94SFR 571-312-005 $14.94SFR 571-312-006 $14.94SFR 571-312-007 $14.94SFR 571-312-008 $14.94SFR 571-312-009 $14.94SFR 571-312-010 $14.94SFR 571-312-012 $14.94SFR 571-312-013 $14.94SFR 571-320-001 $14.94SFR 571-320-002 $14.94SFR 571-320-003 $14.94SFR 571-320-005 $14.94SFR 571-320-006 $14.94SFR 571-320-007 $14.94SFR 571-320-008 $74.70COM 571-320-009 $74.70COM 571-320-010 $14.94SFR 571-320-011 $14.94SFR 571-320-012 $14.94SFR 571-320-013 $14.94SFR 571-320-014 $29.88MFR2 571-331-001 $74.70COM 571-331-002 $74.70COM 571-331-003 $74.70COM 571-332-001 $14.94SFR 571-332-002 $14.94SFR 571-332-003 $14.94SFR 571-332-004 $14.94SFR 571-332-005 $14.94SFR 571-332-006 $14.94SFR 571-332-007 $14.94SFR 571-332-008 $14.94SFR 571-332-009 $74.70COM - 254 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-332-010 $74.70COM 571-332-013 $74.70COM 571-332-014 $14.94SFR 571-332-015 $14.94SFR 571-332-016 $14.94SFR 571-332-017 $14.94SFR 571-332-018 $29.88MFR2 571-332-019 $44.82MFR 571-340-001 $14.94SFR 571-340-002 $14.94SFR 571-340-003 $14.94SFR 571-340-004 $14.94SFR 571-340-005 $14.94SFR 571-340-006 $14.94SFR 571-340-007 $14.94SFR 571-340-008 $14.94SFR 571-340-009 $14.94SFR 571-340-010 $14.94SFR 571-340-011 $14.94SFR 571-340-012 $14.94SFR 571-340-013 $14.94SFR 571-340-014 $14.94SFR 571-340-015 $14.94SFR 571-340-016 $14.94SFR 571-340-017 $14.94SFR 571-340-018 $74.70COM 571-340-019 $74.70COM 571-340-020 $74.70COM 571-340-021 $14.94SFR 571-340-022 $14.94SFR 571-340-023 $14.94SFR 571-340-024 $44.82MFR 571-340-025 $14.94SFR 571-340-026 $14.94SFR 571-340-027 $14.94SFR 571-340-028 $14.94SFR 571-340-029 $14.94SFR 571-340-030 $14.94SFR 571-340-031 $14.94SFR 571-340-032 $14.94SFR 571-340-033 $14.94SFR 571-340-034 $14.94SFR 571-340-035 $14.94SFR 571-340-036 $14.94SFR 571-350-001 $14.94SFR 571-350-002 $14.94SFR 571-350-003 $14.94SFR 571-350-004 $14.94SFR 571-350-005 $14.94SFR 571-350-006 $14.94SFR 571-350-007 $14.94SFR 571-350-008 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 571-350-009 $14.94SFR 571-350-010 $14.94SFR 571-350-011 $14.94SFR 571-350-012 $14.94SFR 571-350-013 $14.94SFR 571-350-014 $14.94SFR 571-350-015 $29.88MFR2 571-350-016 $14.94SFR 571-350-017 $14.94SFR 571-350-018 $14.94SFR 571-350-019 $14.94SFR 571-350-020 $14.94SFR 571-350-021 $14.94SFR 571-350-022 $14.94SFR 571-350-023 $14.94SFR 571-350-024 $14.94SFR 571-350-025 $14.94SFR 571-350-026 $14.94SFR 571-350-027 $14.94SFR 571-360-001 $14.94SFR 571-360-003 $14.94SFR 571-360-004 $14.94SFR 571-360-005 $14.94SFR 571-360-006 $14.94SFR 571-360-007 $14.94SFR 572-011-001 $14.94SFR 572-011-002 $14.94SFR 572-011-003 $14.94SFR 572-011-004 $14.94SFR 572-011-005 $14.94SFR 572-011-006 $7.46VSFR 572-011-007 $14.94SFR 572-011-008 $14.94SFR 572-011-009 $14.94SFR 572-012-001 $14.94SFR 572-012-002 $14.94SFR 572-012-003 $14.94SFR 572-012-004 $14.94SFR 572-012-005 $14.94SFR 572-012-006 $14.94SFR 572-012-007 $14.94SFR 572-012-008 $14.94SFR 572-012-009 $14.94SFR 572-012-011 $14.94SFR 572-012-012 $14.94SFR 572-012-013 $14.94SFR 572-012-014 $14.94SFR 572-012-015 $14.94SFR 572-012-016 $14.94SFR 572-012-020 $14.94SFR 572-012-021 $14.94SFR 572-012-022 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-012-023 $14.94SFR 572-012-024 $14.94SFR 572-012-025 $7.46VSFR 572-012-026 $14.94SFR 572-012-027 $14.94SFR 572-012-028 $14.94SFR 572-013-001 $14.94SFR 572-013-002 $14.94SFR 572-013-003 $14.94SFR 572-013-004 $14.94SFR 572-013-005 $14.94SFR 572-013-006 $14.94SFR 572-013-007 $14.94SFR 572-013-008 $14.94SFR 572-014-001 $14.94SFR 572-014-002 $14.94SFR 572-014-003 $14.94SFR 572-014-004 $14.94SFR 572-014-005 $14.94SFR 572-014-007 $14.94SFR 572-014-008 $14.94SFR 572-014-009 $14.94SFR 572-014-015 $74.70INST 572-014-016 $14.94SFR 572-021-001 $14.94SFR 572-021-002 $14.94SFR 572-021-003 $14.94SFR 572-021-004 $14.94SFR 572-021-005 $14.94SFR 572-021-006 $14.94SFR 572-021-007 $14.94SFR 572-021-008 $14.94SFR 572-021-009 $14.94SFR 572-022-001 $14.94SFR 572-022-002 $14.94SFR 572-022-003 $14.94SFR 572-022-004 $14.94SFR 572-022-005 $14.94SFR 572-022-006 $14.94SFR 572-022-009 $14.94SFR 572-022-010 $14.94SFR 572-022-013 $29.88MFR2 572-022-014 $14.94SFR 572-022-015 $14.94SFR 572-022-016 $14.94SFR 572-022-017 $14.94SFR 572-023-001 $14.94SFR 572-023-002 $14.94SFR 572-023-003 $7.46VSFR 572-023-004 $14.94SFR 572-023-005 $14.94SFR 572-023-006 $14.94SFR - 255 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-023-007 $14.94SFR 572-023-008 $14.94SFR 572-024-001 $14.94SFR 572-024-002 $14.94SFR 572-024-003 $29.88MFR2 572-024-004 $14.94SFR 572-024-005 $14.94SFR 572-024-006 $14.94SFR 572-024-007 $14.94SFR 572-024-008 $14.94SFR 572-024-009 $14.94SFR 572-024-010 $14.94SFR 572-025-001 $14.94SFR 572-025-002 $14.94SFR 572-025-003 $14.94SFR 572-025-004 $14.94SFR 572-025-005 $14.94SFR 572-025-006 $14.94SFR 572-025-007 $14.94SFR 572-025-008 $14.94SFR 572-025-009 $14.94SFR 572-026-001 $14.94SFR 572-026-002 $14.94SFR 572-026-003 $14.94SFR 572-026-004 $14.94SFR 572-026-005 $14.94SFR 572-026-006 $14.94SFR 572-026-007 $14.94SFR 572-026-008 $14.94SFR 572-026-009 $14.94SFR 572-026-010 $14.94SFR 572-026-011 $14.94SFR 572-026-012 $14.94SFR 572-026-013 $14.94SFR 572-026-014 $14.94SFR 572-026-015 $14.94SFR 572-026-016 $14.94SFR 572-026-017 $14.94SFR 572-026-018 $14.94SFR 572-027-001 $14.94SFR 572-027-002 $14.94SFR 572-027-003 $14.94SFR 572-027-004 $14.94SFR 572-027-005 $14.94SFR 572-027-006 $14.94SFR 572-027-007 $14.94SFR 572-027-008 $14.94SFR 572-027-009 $14.94SFR 572-027-010 $14.94SFR 572-027-011 $14.94SFR 572-027-012 $14.94SFR 572-028-001 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-028-002 $14.94SFR 572-028-003 $14.94SFR 572-028-004 $14.94SFR 572-028-005 $14.94SFR 572-028-006 $14.94SFR 572-028-007 $14.94SFR 572-028-008 $14.94SFR 572-028-009 $14.94SFR 572-028-010 $14.94SFR 572-028-011 $29.88MFR2 572-029-006 $7.46VSFR 572-029-007 $14.94SFR 572-029-008 $14.94SFR 572-029-009 $14.94SFR 572-029-011 $29.88MFR2 572-029-012 $14.94SFR 572-031-001 $14.94SFR 572-031-002 $14.94SFR 572-031-003 $14.94SFR 572-031-007 $74.70INST 572-032-001 $14.94SFR 572-032-002 $14.94SFR 572-032-003 $14.94SFR 572-032-004 $14.94SFR 572-032-005 $14.94SFR 572-032-006 $14.94SFR 572-032-007 $14.94SFR 572-032-008 $14.94SFR 572-032-010 $14.94SFR 572-032-012 $14.94SFR 572-032-014 $14.94SFR 572-032-016 $14.94SFR 572-032-017 $14.94SFR 572-032-018 $7.46VSFR 572-032-020 $14.94SFR 572-032-023 $14.94SFR 572-032-024 $14.94SFR 572-032-025 $14.94SFR 572-033-005 $14.94SFR 572-033-006 $14.94SFR 572-033-007 $14.94SFR 572-033-008 $14.94SFR 572-033-009 $14.94SFR 572-033-011 $14.94SFR 572-034-004 $14.94SFR 572-034-005 $14.94SFR 572-034-006 $14.94SFR 572-034-007 $14.94SFR 572-034-010 $14.94SFR 572-034-011 $14.94SFR 572-034-012 $14.94SFR 572-034-014 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-034-015 $14.94SFR 572-034-016 $14.94SFR 572-034-017 $14.94SFR 572-034-018 $7.46VSFR 572-050-001 $14.94SFR 572-050-002 $14.94SFR 572-050-005 $14.94SFR 572-050-009 $14.94SFR 572-050-013 $14.94SFR 572-050-016 $14.94SFR 572-050-017 $14.94SFR 572-050-020 $14.94SFR 572-050-021 $14.94SFR 572-050-022 $14.94SFR 572-050-023 $14.94SFR 572-050-024 $14.94SFR 572-050-025 $29.88MFR2 572-050-026 $14.94SFR 572-060-008 $14.94SFR 572-060-009 $14.94SFR 572-060-010 $14.94SFR 572-060-011 $14.94SFR 572-060-012 $14.94SFR 572-060-013 $14.94SFR 572-060-016 $14.94SFR 572-060-017 $14.94SFR 572-060-018 $14.94SFR 572-060-026 $14.94SFR 572-060-027 $14.94SFR 572-060-028 $14.94SFR 572-060-029 $14.94SFR 572-060-030 $14.94SFR 572-060-031 $14.94SFR 572-060-032 $14.94SFR 572-070-001 $14.94SFR 572-070-002 $14.94SFR 572-070-003 $14.94SFR 572-070-011 $14.94SFR 572-070-013 $14.94SFR 572-070-014 $14.94SFR 572-070-015 $14.94SFR 572-070-016 $14.94SFR 572-070-019 $14.94SFR 572-070-020 $14.94SFR 572-080-005 $7.46VSFR 572-080-007 $14.94SFR 572-080-008 $14.94SFR 572-080-009 $14.94SFR 572-080-016 $14.94SFR 572-080-017 $7.46VSFR 572-080-018 $14.94SFR 572-080-023 $14.94SFR - 256 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-080-024 $14.94SFR 572-080-025 $14.94SFR 572-080-026 $14.94SFR 572-080-028 $14.94SFR 572-080-029 $7.46VSFR 572-080-030 $14.94SFR 572-080-031 $7.46VSFR 572-080-035 $14.94SFR 572-080-036 $14.94SFR 572-090-001 $14.94SFR 572-090-002 $14.94SFR 572-090-003 $14.94SFR 572-090-004 $14.94SFR 572-090-005 $14.94SFR 572-090-006 $14.94SFR 572-090-007 $14.94SFR 572-090-008 $14.94SFR 572-090-009 $14.94SFR 572-090-010 $14.94SFR 572-090-011 $14.94SFR 572-090-012 $14.94SFR 572-090-013 $14.94SFR 572-090-014 $14.94SFR 572-090-015 $14.94SFR 572-090-016 $14.94SFR 572-090-017 $14.94SFR 572-090-018 $14.94SFR 572-090-019 $14.94SFR 572-100-001 $14.94SFR 572-100-002 $14.94SFR 572-100-003 $14.94SFR 572-100-004 $14.94SFR 572-100-005 $14.94SFR 572-100-006 $14.94SFR 572-100-007 $14.94SFR 572-100-008 $7.46VSFR 572-100-009 $14.94SFR 572-100-010 $14.94SFR 572-100-011 $14.94SFR 572-100-012 $14.94SFR 572-100-013 $14.94SFR 572-100-014 $14.94SFR 572-100-015 $14.94SFR 572-100-016 $14.94SFR 572-100-017 $14.94SFR 572-100-018 $14.94SFR 572-110-001 $14.94SFR 572-110-002 $14.94SFR 572-110-003 $14.94SFR 572-110-004 $14.94SFR 572-110-005 $14.94SFR 572-110-006 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-110-007 $14.94SFR 572-110-008 $14.94SFR 572-110-009 $14.94SFR 572-110-010 $14.94SFR 572-110-011 $14.94SFR 572-110-012 $14.94SFR 572-110-013 $14.94SFR 572-110-014 $14.94SFR 572-110-015 $14.94SFR 572-110-016 $14.94SFR 572-110-017 $14.94SFR 572-110-018 $14.94SFR 572-110-019 $14.94SFR 572-110-020 $14.94SFR 572-110-021 $14.94SFR 572-110-022 $14.94SFR 572-110-023 $14.94SFR 572-110-024 $14.94SFR 572-110-025 $14.94SFR 572-110-029 $14.94SFR 572-121-003 $14.94SFR 572-121-004 $14.94SFR 572-121-005 $14.94SFR 572-121-006 $14.94SFR 572-121-007 $14.94SFR 572-121-008 $14.94SFR 572-122-001 $14.94SFR 572-122-002 $14.94SFR 572-122-003 $14.94SFR 572-122-004 $14.94SFR 572-122-005 $14.94SFR 572-122-006 $14.94SFR 572-122-007 $14.94SFR 572-122-008 $14.94SFR 572-122-009 $14.94SFR 572-122-010 $14.94SFR 572-122-011 $14.94SFR 572-123-001 $14.94SFR 572-123-002 $14.94SFR 572-123-003 $14.94SFR 572-123-004 $14.94SFR 572-124-001 $14.94SFR 572-124-002 $14.94SFR 572-124-003 $14.94SFR 572-124-004 $14.94SFR 572-124-005 $14.94SFR 572-124-006 $14.94SFR 572-124-007 $14.94SFR 572-124-008 $14.94SFR 572-124-009 $14.94SFR 572-124-010 $14.94SFR 572-124-011 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-124-012 $14.94SFR 572-124-013 $14.94SFR 572-124-014 $14.94SFR 572-124-015 $14.94SFR 572-124-016 $14.94SFR 572-124-017 $14.94SFR 572-124-018 $14.94SFR 572-130-001 $14.94SFR 572-130-002 $14.94SFR 572-130-003 $14.94SFR 572-130-004 $14.94SFR 572-130-005 $14.94SFR 572-130-006 $14.94SFR 572-130-007 $14.94SFR 572-130-008 $14.94SFR 572-130-009 $14.94SFR 572-130-010 $14.94SFR 572-130-011 $14.94SFR 572-130-012 $14.94SFR 572-130-013 $14.94SFR 572-130-014 $14.94SFR 572-130-015 $14.94SFR 572-130-016 $14.94SFR 572-130-017 $14.94SFR 572-130-018 $14.94SFR 572-130-019 $14.94SFR 572-130-020 $14.94SFR 572-130-021 $14.94SFR 572-130-022 $14.94SFR 572-130-023 $14.94SFR 572-130-024 $14.94SFR 572-130-025 $14.94SFR 572-130-026 $14.94SFR 572-130-027 $14.94SFR 572-130-028 $14.94SFR 572-130-029 $14.94SFR 572-130-030 $14.94SFR 572-140-001 $14.94SFR 572-140-002 $14.94SFR 572-140-004 $14.94SFR 572-140-005 $14.94SFR 572-140-006 $14.94SFR 572-140-007 $14.94SFR 572-140-008 $14.94SFR 572-140-009 $14.94SFR 572-140-010 $14.94SFR 572-140-011 $14.94SFR 572-140-012 $14.94SFR 572-140-013 $14.94SFR 572-140-014 $14.94SFR 572-140-015 $14.94SFR 572-140-016 $14.94SFR - 257 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-140-017 $14.94SFR 572-140-018 $14.94SFR 572-140-019 $14.94SFR 572-140-022 $14.94SFR 572-140-025 $14.94SFR 572-140-027 $14.94SFR 572-140-028 $14.94SFR 572-150-001 $14.94SFR 572-150-002 $14.94SFR 572-150-003 $14.94SFR 572-150-004 $14.94SFR 572-150-005 $14.94SFR 572-150-006 $14.94SFR 572-150-007 $14.94SFR 572-150-008 $14.94SFR 572-150-009 $14.94SFR 572-150-010 $14.94SFR 572-150-011 $14.94SFR 572-150-012 $14.94SFR 572-150-013 $14.94SFR 572-150-015 $14.94SFR 572-150-016 $14.94SFR 572-150-017 $14.94SFR 572-150-018 $14.94SFR 572-150-019 $14.94SFR 572-150-020 $14.94SFR 572-150-021 $14.94SFR 572-150-022 $14.94SFR 572-150-023 $14.94SFR 572-150-024 $14.94SFR 572-150-025 $14.94SFR 572-150-026 $14.94SFR 572-150-027 $14.94SFR 572-150-028 $14.94SFR 572-150-029 $14.94SFR 572-150-030 $14.94SFR 572-150-031 $14.94SFR 572-160-001 $14.94SFR 572-160-002 $14.94SFR 572-160-003 $14.94SFR 572-160-004 $14.94SFR 572-160-005 $14.94SFR 572-160-006 $14.94SFR 572-160-010 $14.94SFR 572-160-011 $14.94SFR 572-160-012 $14.94SFR 572-160-013 $14.94SFR 572-160-014 $14.94SFR 572-160-015 $14.94SFR 572-160-016 $14.94SFR 572-160-018 $14.94SFR 572-160-023 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-160-024 $14.94SFR 572-160-025 $14.94SFR 572-160-026 $14.94SFR 572-160-027 $14.94SFR 572-160-028 $14.94SFR 572-160-029 $14.94SFR 572-160-030 $14.94SFR 572-160-032 $14.94SFR 572-170-001 $14.94SFR 572-170-002 $14.94SFR 572-170-003 $14.94SFR 572-170-004 $14.94SFR 572-170-005 $14.94SFR 572-170-006 $14.94SFR 572-170-007 $14.94SFR 572-170-008 $14.94SFR 572-170-009 $14.94SFR 572-170-011 $14.94SFR 572-170-012 $14.94SFR 572-170-013 $14.94SFR 572-170-014 $14.94SFR 572-170-015 $14.94SFR 572-170-016 $14.94SFR 572-170-017 $14.94SFR 572-170-018 $14.94SFR 572-170-019 $14.94SFR 572-170-020 $14.94SFR 572-170-021 $14.94SFR 572-170-022 $14.94SFR 572-170-023 $14.94SFR 572-170-024 $14.94SFR 572-170-025 $14.94SFR 572-170-026 $14.94SFR 572-170-028 $14.94SFR 572-170-029 $14.94SFR 572-170-030 $14.94SFR 572-170-031 $14.94SFR 572-170-032 $14.94SFR 572-170-033 $14.94SFR 572-170-034 $14.94SFR 572-170-035 $14.94SFR 572-170-037 $14.94SFR 572-170-038 $14.94SFR 572-170-039 $14.94SFR 572-170-040 $14.94SFR 572-170-041 $14.94SFR 572-170-042 $14.94SFR 572-170-043 $14.94SFR 572-170-044 $14.94SFR 572-170-045 $14.94SFR 572-181-002 $14.94SFR 572-181-003 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-181-004 $14.94SFR 572-181-005 $14.94SFR 572-181-006 $14.94SFR 572-181-007 $14.94SFR 572-181-008 $14.94SFR 572-181-009 $14.94SFR 572-181-010 $14.94SFR 572-181-011 $14.94SFR 572-181-013 $14.94SFR 572-181-014 $14.94SFR 572-181-015 $14.94SFR 572-181-019 $14.94SFR 572-181-020 $14.94SFR 572-181-022 $14.94SFR 572-181-023 $14.94SFR 572-181-024 $14.94SFR 572-181-025 $14.94SFR 572-181-026 $14.94SFR 572-181-027 $14.94SFR 572-181-029 $14.94SFR 572-181-030 $14.94SFR 572-181-031 $14.94SFR 572-181-032 $14.94SFR 572-181-033 $14.94SFR 572-181-034 $14.94SFR 572-181-035 $14.94SFR 572-181-036 $7.46VSFR 572-181-037 $14.94SFR 572-181-038 $14.94SFR 572-181-039 $7.46VSFR 572-181-040 $14.94SFR 572-181-041 $14.94SFR 572-182-001 $14.94SFR 572-182-002 $14.94SFR 572-182-003 $14.94SFR 572-182-004 $29.88MFR2 572-182-007 $14.94SFR 572-182-008 $14.94SFR 572-182-009 $14.94SFR 572-182-010 $14.94SFR 572-182-013 $14.94SFR 572-182-014 $14.94SFR 572-182-015 $14.94SFR 572-182-016 $14.94SFR 572-182-017 $14.94SFR 572-190-001 $14.94SFR 572-190-002 $14.94SFR 572-190-003 $14.94SFR 572-190-004 $14.94SFR 572-190-005 $14.94SFR 572-190-006 $14.94SFR 572-190-007 $14.94SFR - 258 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-190-008 $14.94SFR 572-190-009 $14.94SFR 572-190-010 $14.94SFR 572-190-011 $14.94SFR 572-190-012 $14.94SFR 572-190-013 $14.94SFR 572-201-002 $14.94SFR 572-201-003 $14.94SFR 572-201-004 $14.94SFR 572-201-005 $14.94SFR 572-201-006 $14.94SFR 572-201-007 $14.94SFR 572-201-008 $14.94SFR 572-201-009 $14.94SFR 572-201-010 $14.94SFR 572-201-011 $14.94SFR 572-201-012 $14.94SFR 572-201-013 $14.94SFR 572-201-014 $14.94SFR 572-201-015 $14.94SFR 572-201-016 $14.94SFR 572-201-019 $14.94SFR 572-201-020 $14.94SFR 572-201-021 $7.46VSFR 572-202-004 $14.94SFR 572-202-005 $14.94SFR 572-202-006 $14.94SFR 572-202-007 $14.94SFR 572-202-008 $14.94SFR 572-202-009 $14.94SFR 572-202-010 $14.94SFR 572-202-012 $14.94SFR 572-202-013 $14.94SFR 572-202-014 $14.94SFR 572-202-015 $14.94SFR 572-202-016 $14.94SFR 572-202-020 $14.94SFR 572-202-023 $14.94SFR 572-202-024 $14.94SFR 572-202-025 $14.94SFR 572-202-026 $14.94SFR 572-202-027 $14.94SFR 572-202-029 $14.94SFR 572-202-032 $14.94SFR 572-203-001 $14.94SFR 572-203-002 $14.94SFR 572-203-003 $14.94SFR 572-203-004 $14.94SFR 572-203-007 $14.94SFR 572-203-008 $14.94SFR 572-203-009 $14.94SFR 572-203-010 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-203-011 $14.94SFR 572-203-012 $7.46VSFR 572-203-013 $14.94SFR 572-203-014 $14.94SFR 572-203-015 $14.94SFR 572-203-016 $14.94SFR 572-203-017 $14.94SFR 572-203-018 $14.94SFR 572-203-019 $14.94SFR 572-203-020 $14.94SFR 572-203-021 $14.94SFR 572-203-022 $14.94SFR 572-203-023 $14.94SFR 572-203-024 $14.94SFR 572-203-025 $14.94SFR 572-203-028 $7.46VSFR 572-203-029 $14.94SFR 572-204-001 $14.94SFR 572-204-002 $14.94SFR 572-204-003 $14.94SFR 572-204-004 $14.94SFR 572-204-005 $14.94SFR 572-204-006 $14.94SFR 572-204-007 $14.94SFR 572-204-008 $14.94SFR 572-204-009 $14.94SFR 572-204-010 $14.94SFR 572-204-011 $14.94SFR 572-204-012 $14.94SFR 572-204-013 $14.94SFR 572-204-014 $14.94SFR 572-204-015 $14.94SFR 572-204-016 $14.94SFR 572-204-017 $14.94SFR 572-204-018 $14.94SFR 572-204-019 $14.94SFR 572-204-020 $14.94SFR 572-210-002 $14.94SFR 572-221-001 $14.94SFR 572-221-003 $14.94SFR 572-221-004 $14.94SFR 572-221-005 $14.94SFR 572-221-006 $14.94SFR 572-221-007 $14.94SFR 572-221-008 $7.46VSFR 572-222-003 $14.94SFR 572-222-004 $14.94SFR 572-222-005 $14.94SFR 572-222-006 $14.94SFR 572-222-007 $14.94SFR 572-222-008 $14.94SFR 572-222-009 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-222-010 $14.94SFR 572-222-011 $14.94SFR 572-222-012 $14.94SFR 572-222-013 $14.94SFR 572-222-014 $14.94SFR 572-222-015 $14.94SFR 572-222-016 $14.94SFR 572-222-017 $14.94SFR 572-222-018 $14.94SFR 572-222-019 $14.94SFR 572-222-020 $14.94SFR 572-222-021 $14.94SFR 572-222-022 $14.94SFR 572-222-023 $74.70INST 572-222-025 $7.46VSFR 572-222-026 $14.94SFR 572-231-001 $14.94SFR 572-231-002 $14.94SFR 572-231-003 $14.94SFR 572-231-004 $14.94SFR 572-231-005 $14.94SFR 572-231-006 $14.94SFR 572-231-007 $14.94SFR 572-231-008 $14.94SFR 572-231-009 $14.94SFR 572-231-010 $7.46VSFR 572-231-011 $14.94SFR 572-231-012 $14.94SFR 572-231-013 $14.94SFR 572-231-014 $14.94SFR 572-231-015 $14.94SFR 572-231-016 $14.94SFR 572-231-017 $14.94SFR 572-231-018 $14.94SFR 572-231-019 $14.94SFR 572-231-020 $14.94SFR 572-231-021 $14.94SFR 572-231-022 $14.94SFR 572-231-023 $14.94SFR 572-231-024 $14.94SFR 572-231-025 $14.94SFR 572-231-026 $14.94SFR 572-231-027 $29.88MFR2 572-231-028 $14.94SFR 572-231-029 $14.94SFR 572-232-001 $14.94SFR 572-232-002 $14.94SFR 572-232-003 $14.94SFR 572-232-004 $14.94SFR 572-232-005 $14.94SFR 572-232-006 $14.94SFR 572-232-007 $14.94SFR - 259 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 CSA L-100 Countywide Street Lighting Tentative Annual Report Fiscal Year 2019-20 Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 572-232-008 $14.94SFR 572-232-009 $14.94SFR 572-232-010 $14.94SFR 572-232-011 $14.94SFR 572-232-012 $14.94SFR 572-232-013 $14.94SFR 572-232-014 $14.94SFR 572-232-015 $14.94SFR 572-232-016 $14.94SFR 572-232-017 $14.94SFR 572-232-018 $14.94SFR 572-232-019 $14.94SFR 572-232-020 $14.94SFR 572-232-021 $14.94SFR 572-232-022 $14.94SFR 572-232-023 $14.94SFR 572-232-024 $14.94SFR 572-232-025 $14.94SFR 572-232-026 $14.94SFR 572-233-001 $14.94SFR 572-233-002 $14.94SFR 572-233-003 $14.94SFR 572-233-004 $14.94SFR 572-233-005 $14.94SFR 572-233-006 $14.94SFR 572-233-007 $14.94SFR 572-233-008 $14.94SFR 572-233-009 $14.94SFR 572-233-010 $14.94SFR 572-233-011 $14.94SFR 572-233-012 $14.94SFR 572-233-013 $14.94SFR 572-233-014 $14.94SFR 572-233-015 $14.94SFR 572-233-016 $14.94SFR 572-234-001 $14.94SFR 572-234-002 $14.94SFR 572-234-003 $14.94SFR 572-234-004 $14.94SFR 572-234-005 $14.94SFR 572-234-006 $14.94SFR 572-234-007 $14.94SFR 572-240-001 $74.70INST 572-240-009 $74.70INST 572-240-010 $74.70INST 572-240-011 $74.70INST 573-091-002 $14.94SFR 573-091-003 $14.94SFR 573-091-004 $14.94SFR 573-091-007 $14.94SFR 573-091-008 $14.94SFR 573-091-009 $14.94SFR Assessor's Parcel Number FY19-20 Service Charge Property Class 573-092-001 $14.94SFR 573-092-002 $14.94SFR 573-092-003 $14.94SFR 573-092-004 $14.94SFR 573-093-001 $14.94SFR 573-093-002 $14.94SFR 573-093-003 $14.94SFR 573-093-004 $14.94SFR 573-093-005 $14.94SFR 573-093-006 $14.94SFR 573-093-011 $14.94SFR 573-093-012 $14.94SFR 573-093-013 $14.94SFR 573-093-014 $14.94SFR 573-093-015 $14.94SFR 573-093-016 $14.94SFR 573-093-017 $14.94SFR 38,133Total Parcels: $612,779.72 Total Assessment: - 260 -N:\$PROJ\CONTRA\CSAL-100\FY19-20\FOXPRO\froll_csa l-100.frx - L1001920s.dbf 05/06/19 RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. RECEIVE update report from the interdepartmental Illegal Dumping Think Tank team regarding outreach, legislative efforts, and updates to recommendations originally presented in October 2018. 2. APPROVE final recommendations from interdepartmental team on strategies to better address illegal dumping. 3. DIRECT staff to return to the Board with a proposal to authorize the expenditure of $378,000 to fund implementation of the recommended new or expanded strategies that cannot be covered within existing approved budgets. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff costs to prepare these recommendations and coordinate with neighboring jurisdictions and franchise haulers have been accommodated using existing, budgeted staff resources. Some of the potential actions discussed in the recommendations would involve additional costs that cannot be accommodated within existing budgets. Estimated costs of existing and new/expanded actions are included in Table 1 (Exhibit B). The total estimated annual cost of existing efforts is approximately $1,827,000 and recommended new/expanded actions would cost $378,000. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes:see addendum VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Deidra Dingman, 925-674-7825 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: D.10 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Funding recommendations from interdepartmental team regarding illegal dumping in Contra Costa County BACKGROUND: The recommendations and background materials pertaining to illegal dumping in Contra Costa County were prepared by a team of experienced professionals from five different County departments ("interdepartmental Think Tank team" or "interdepartmental team"). The five participating Departments are the Sheriff’s Office, the District Attorney’s Office, the Department of Public Works, the Environmental Health Division of the Health Services Department and the Department of Conservation of Development (DCD). On October 23, 2018, the Illegal Dumping Think Tank team presented the County Board of Supervisors with background about the County’s illegal dumping problem and existing efforts as well as preliminary recommendations. That report summarized the work of the interdepartmental team to examine the extent of the problem, prior efforts to address it, strategies commonly employed throughout the United States and unique approaches employed by others. The report summarized major lessons learned and outlined a proposed approach for addressing the issue that consisted of 56 existing, expanded and new strategies. These strategies are grouped into four categories: Educate, Prevent, Clean-Up and Enforce. The report included a table detailing the 56 strategies and their estimated cost (an updated version of this table is attached as Exhibit B). The report also included a detailed slide presentation that contained most of the background and rationale for the recommendations (attached as Exhibit D). At the October 23, 2018 meeting, the Board accepted the report from the interdepartmental team and requested that it: 1. Reach out to neighboring jurisdictions and franchise haulers to solicit additional input to refine the preliminary presentation and recommendations (UPDATE: See Cities & Franchise Haulers sections below) 2. Collaborate with Alameda County on shared legislative priorities related to illegal dumping (UPDATE: See Collaborative Legislative Efforts section below) 3. Explore opportunities for increasing effectiveness of the waste hauler ordinance (UPDATE: See sections below on Cities and Collaborative Legislative Efforts) 4. Pursue opportunities to have franchise hauling companies offer the public additional, more frequent pick-up options (UPDATE: Conversations are on-going, see Franchise Haulers section below) CITIES: On February 25, 2019, the interdepartmental team hosted a countywide meeting about "Collaborative Strategies for Reducing Illegal Dumping in Contra Costa County" to share information and facilitate coordination among local jurisdictions in the County. Representatives from a range of different Departments in all nineteen cities were invited and encouraged to attend. Approximately 35 people attended, including representatives from the following ten cities: Antioch, Clayton, Concord, El Cerrito, Hercules, Oakley, Pittsburg, Richmond, San Pablo, and Walnut Creek. This meeting provided an opportunity to learn from one another to identify community initiatives and actions that are known or believed to be most effective at reducing illegal dumping. County staff shared copies of Table 1 (Exhibit B) with the 56 preliminary recommended strategies designed to help address the on-going problem of illegal dumping by helping Educate, Prevent, Clean-up or Enforce. Special attention was provided to the recommended strategies that would be most effective if implemented cooperatively, which covered the full spectrum from Educate (Public Outreach Campaign) to Prevent (Mandatory Garbage Service, Free Mattress Drop-Off) to Cleanup (Right-of-way Debris Removal) to Enforce (Law Enforcement Investigation, Surveillance Cameras, Legislative Action). Staff provided a detailed explanation of the County's Hauler's Ordinance, explained the value of consistency, and offered assistance with enforcement if the cities were to adopt similar ordinances and delegated the associated enforcement authority. City representatives were generally in favor of the presented strategies and participated in the discussion, asked questions, and shared similar strategies that their respective jurisdictions have implemented. Participants came up with a number of ideas for effectively working together to address the challenging illegal dumping issue. City representatives expressed interest in staying connected, and County staff agreed to create an email distribution list for participants to share updates with each other. County staff also agreed to notify the group of when the illegal dumping issue would go back to the Board, and offered to convene future meetings as needed. A full meeting summary with information shared by those in attendance is attached as Exhibit A. FRANCHISE HAULERS: DCD staff has solicited and received some input about the recommended strategies from each of the County's franchise haulers. Franchise haulers expressed general support for the recommendations. There are six strategies in Table 1 (Exhibit B) which would require increases in the rates charged to customers in the applicable franchise area(s) in order to fund strategy implementation, three of which are identified for a 'Future Phase'. Franchise haulers and staff agree that it would be best to implement strategies in phases in conjunction with established rate setting cycles to ensure the services are affordable and so the impact to rates is spread over time. Staff intends to continue working with each franchise hauler to prioritize strategies based on franchise-specific needs and circumstances in order to maximize potential effectiveness of the initial phases. Although rates are usually adjusted annually, the best time to implement new or expanded services that require rate increases is during the more comprehensive "Base Year" rate cycles which are only every 3-4 years. Currently, one of the County's three franchises is going through a "Base Year" rate setting process and we are actively discussing potential implementation of the strategies identified as highest priority for that service area. COLLABORATIVE LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS: Representatives from Alameda and Contra Costa counties are working together to pursue legislation to address shared needs to more effectively address illegal dumping in our respective jurisdictions. The County's adopted 2019 State Platform includes the following sponsored-legislation proposal related to illegal dumping, which resulted in AB 1216 specific to our two counties: Seek legislation, in conjunction with Alameda County and other partners, and support legislation that specifically establishes statewide hauler permitting requirements and associated penalties as well as increases penalties allowed by State law for illegal dumping. The 2019 State Platform also includes the following related policy which pertain to AB 215 and SB 409: SUPPORT efforts that will help counties more effectively combat illegal dumping, including but not limited to establishing a more reasonable burden of proof standard, changing any remaining infractions to misdemeanors and increasing penalty amounts or options (e.g. vehicle seizure). At the County's Legislation Committee meeting on May 15, 2019, the Committee members approved the recommendation by the interdepartmental Illegal Dumping Think Tank team that they consider recommending to the Board of Supervisors a position of "Support" on three bills related to illegal dumping: AB 215 (Mathis), SB 409 (Wilk), and AB 1216 (Bauer-Kahan). Two of these bills are no longer moving forward (AB 215 and AB 1216). The Board will consider the Legislation Committee's recommendation related to the third illegal dumping bill, SB 409, at the meeting on June 11, 2019. All three bills are summarized below. AB 1216 Summary: (this bill is no longer moving forward) Would have authorized the counties of Alameda and Contra Costa to establish a pilot program to employ 2 law enforcement officers, one from each county, solely for the purpose of enforcing dumping laws in those counties. Potential state general fund revenue to support AB 1216, pending Legislative action on the State Budget. SB 409 Summary: Increases the allowable fines for illegal dumping, expand the crime of illegal dumping to include the transporting of waste matter, rocks, concrete, asphalt or dirt for the purpose of dumping, makes it illegal to transport commercial quantities to dump in specified locations, and makes it a crime to dump, deposit or receive waste matter on private property with owner consent without any required permit/license. AB 215 Summary: (this bill is no longer moving forward) Would have made dumping waste matter on private property, including on any private road or highway, without consent of the owner, punishable with specified fines. Requires the fine to be doubled for a fourth or subsequent violation if the prosecuting attorney pleads and proves, or, in an infraction case, if the court finds, that the waste placed, deposited, or dumped includes used tires. County staff will continue to work through our state legislative advocate to pursue new legislation to implement the Board's adopted legislative goals related to illegal dumping. In addition, staff is evaluating options for increasing the severity of consequences for violations of the Hauler Ordinance. FINAL RECOMMENDED STRATEGIES The list of Final Recommended Strategies reflected in Table 1 (Exhibit B) have been updated from the preliminary recommended strategies presented in October 2018, to reflect input received from the Board and during outreach. The amount of funding recommended to be allocated in order to implement the strategies not covered within existing budgets or expected to be funded in future garbage rate reviews has been reduced from $944,000 to $378,000. The reduction of $566,000 is a result of two changes: 1. Net reduction of $416,000 due to Sheriff's Office cost-saving suggestion to fund four per-diem deputies (maximum of 900 hours/year per deputy, for a combined total of 3,600 hours per year) for a total cost of $150,000 rather than dedicating two full-time deputy positions at a cost of $566,000 (Strategy # 45 in Table 1, Exhibit B), and 2. Net reduction of $150,000 due to the Board's approval of an appropriations adjustment of an equivalent dollar amount on January 22, 2019 to fund the removal and disposal of inoperable RVs throughout the County on an as needed basis (Strategy #40 in Table 1, Exhibit B). The recommendations have also been revised to stress the need to increase the effectiveness of the Hauler Ordinance (largely by seeking cooperation from neighboring jurisdictions and/or the state) and to reflect the input of cities on the desirability of ongoing coordination (Strategies 41 and 56). A copy of the slide presentation for the June 11th meeting is included as Exhibit C. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Board would not receive the illegal dumping update report nor approve allocation of $378,000 to fund implementation of the final recommended strategies. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Approved all staff recommendations, referred implementation of the recommendations to a new Ad Hoc Committee composed of Supervisors Burgis and Glover and directed staff to report back by Sep 30 with a proposal to authorize the expenditure of funds to implement the recommendations and with status of enforcing mandatory subscription ordinance and other recommendations. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Meeting Summary Collaborative Strategies for Reducing Illegal Dumping Exhibit B: Table 1 - Recommended Illegal Dumping Strategies and Funding Allocations Exhibit C: 6-11-2019 Illegal Dumping Slide Presentation Exhibit D: 10-23-2018 Illegal Dumping Slide Presentation Meeting Summary Collaborative Strategies for Reducing Illegal Dumping in Contra Costa County Monday, February 25, 2019 12:00pm‐2:00pm Contra Costa County Sequoia & Madrone Room – 2nd Floor 50 Douglas Drive Martinez, CA 94553 List of Jurisdictions and departments in Attendance: 1. Antioch – Community Development, Code Enforcement 2. Clayton – City Manager’s Office 3. Concord – Code Enforcement 4. El Cerrito – Public Works 5. Hercules – Public Works 6. Oakley – Code Enforcement 7. Pittsburg ‐ Clean Water Program, Environmental Affairs 8. Richmond ‐ Abatement, Code Enforcement, Infrastructure, Maintenance, and Operations, Parks 9. San Pablo – Code Enforcement, Public Works 10. Walnut Creek – Code Enforcement 11. Contra Costa County – Board of Supervisors Districts II & III, Code Enforcement, Conservation & Development, District Attorney’s Office, Environmental Health, Public Works, Sheriff’s Office Meeting Purpose: Share information and facilitate coordination among local jurisdictions in Contra Costa County. Numerous studies and experts endorse use of a multi‐pronged effort to reduce illegal dumping. The most successful programs use a combination of education, prevention, cleanup and enforcement strategies. This meeting will provide an opportunity to learn from one another to identify community initiatives and actions that are known or believed to be most effective at reducing illegal dumping. Preliminary Staff Recommended Strategies to Combat Illegal Dumping – County 1. EDUCATE: Public Outreach Campaign 2. PREVENT: Mandatory Garbage Service, Free Mattress Drop‐Off 3. CLEANUP: Right‐of‐way Debris Removal 4. ENFORCE: Law Enforcement Investigation, Surveillance Cameras, Legislative Action Contra Costa County:  Mitigation funded disposal voucher program for residents of North Richmond (incorporated & unincorporated) modeled after the City of San Pablo’s program. Residents can request up to $60 of disposal vouchers per year (12 $5 vouchers) which can be used in lieu of cash when disposing at Golden Bear Transfer Station.  Non‐Franchise Hauler (e.g. junk removal) Permit Ordinance: o Refer to pamphlet attached or visit https://cchealth.org/eh/solid‐waste/non‐franchise‐ permit.php o Not instead of franchised haulers; o County permit and decal that would be recognized by county and cities o 1‐800‐GOT‐JUNK in the process of applying Hercules:  When illegally dumped items contain address information, Hercules will notify resident to clean up themselves. Sometimes the resident alleges that they paid someone to haul the illegally dumped waste, in which case the City advises them that they need to either get them to remove the waste or do so themselves by a specified date. This method has usually proven to be effective.  Dumpster Days (Community Clean‐ups) – City used to rotate locations among various neighborhoods, but have switched to having them exclusively in one centralized location at the city’s corp yard because it is more efficient and effective. o City staff monitor event – checking for proof of residence and hazardous materials o Some small contractors have started trying to sneak in.  New disposal challenges associated with illegal cannabis grow houses (e.g. fertilizers & pesticides) Pittsburg:  More and more construction materials are found dumped illegally. Unlicensed contractors are suspected to be significant contributors to illegal dumping problem.  Expressed interest in learning more about how the County’s non‐franchise hauler permit ordinance implementation is going because it is something their City was considering too.  Potential strategy: Desirable to hold property owner accountable if waste from their property was dumped illegally and for construction materials dumped by unlicensed contractors, for the property owner should pay double the fine when hiring an unlicensed contractor.  Societal shift as core of illegal dumping problem that continues to enable poor behavior by cleaning up with enforcement. Oakley:  Code enforcement treats items set‐out on sidewalk with a “Free” sign attached the same as an illegal dumped item. They notify the property owner that they must remove the item(s) within 24 hours or pay the cost for the City to do so. o Often times, additional items will be added to free pile, or furniture will move away from original location in front of a residence.  Police Department Oakley is participating in The Neighborhood Security Camera Registration Program that allows residences to voluntarily register doorbell cameras: o It is an effort to use our joint resources to help fight crime and increase the likelihood of developing investigative clues leading to the identification of criminals responsible for violating the security of the community. o With your support and permission, Oakley Police personnel would view your security video footage when we believe your camera may have recorded events that could aid in an investigation. o County Sheriff has something similar in place for the unincorporated area.  Community Clean‐ups/Dumpster Days – Residents must provide proof of residence and pre‐ register for a timeslot and list what they plan to dispose of. Antioch:  Antioch’s wants to focus efforts on holding the source responsible. o When there is an address tied to illegal dumping, the city will send a warning letter to the address and cite the property owner after a second offense. o Pittsburg is trying something similar but it has been a bit hit or miss.  There seems to be highest demand to get rid of extra waste (clean‐ups/on‐call bulky pick‐ups) twice a year, spring time and in November, before the holidays.  Potential Strategy: Arizona offers monthly bulky item pick up of up to 1 cubic yard per month seemed very effective at preventing illegal dumping Clayton:  Free bulky and e‐waste pick up, on call 4 times a year  Rely on residents to act as volunteer monitors in order to verify who tries to participate in Community Clean‐up days  C&D dumping efforts – For CalGreen compliance: o Applicants are required to submit a deposit and o CalGreen documentation must have homeowner signature. o Only original recycling receipts are accepted Richmond:  At least 12 community clean ups a year o CalRecycle grants allows for additional community clean ups and Multi Family Bulky Item  Multi‐Family Bulky Item Pick up –Thanks to a CalRecycle grant Richmond was able to offer this free new service, however there has been low participation. o Richmond residents are eligible for free bulky item pickup! Collections may be scheduled for single‐family homes, duplexes, and multi‐family properties with up to 19 units o Serves single‐family homes, duplexes, and multi‐family buildings with up to 19 units o May substitute five E‐waste items for one bulky item o No commercial‐sized appliances, hazardous materials, or construction and demolition materials o Property owner or manager of multi‐family properties must register with Republic Services  An individual was caught and admitted to illegally dumping 2 ½ loads in Richmond o City Attorney is in the process of prosecution o City intends to raise awareness upon successful prosecution to discourage others  In 2018, Richmond cleaned up more tons of illegal dumping than San Jose, a much larger city with a larger population. o Noted that this method is chronic and enabling, but doesn’t know what else to do.  Richmond earned $42,900 in 2018 and $32,000 in 2017 by picking up illegally dumped mattresses and submitting claims to through the Mattress Recycling Council’s Illegal Mattress Dumping Compensation Program. o Mattress Recycling Council (MRC) developed Illegally Dumped Mattress Collection Initiative to identify where mattresses are illegally dumped in the state, and proactively address the issue in affected communities. One component of this strategy includes financial compensation to entities responsible for collecting illegally dumped mattresses in their communities through MRC’s Illegal Mattress Dumping Compensation Program. o Entities responsible for collection of illegally dumped mattresses from public rights‐of‐ way can register to receive compensation in exchange for data identifying the location of dumping activities. These entities include California local governments. o As of 2018, MRC has budgeted $750,000 per year for this statewide effort. MRC will pay all registered collectors of illegally dumped mattresses the same amount per unit for data specific to illegal mattress dumping. The actual per unit rate is calculated at the close of a calendar year by dividing the total funded amount, by the number of illegally dumped units collected and reported in that calendar year. o In 2018, registered collectors of illegally dumped mattresses were paid up to $15.00 per unit for data specific to illegal mattress dumping.  Illegal Dumping now intersecting clean ups associated with homeless encampments. San Pablo:  San Pablo has a free disposal voucher system in place for its residents o No need to pre‐register or schedule a drop off time; as long as drop is made during facility business hours o Vouchers are assigned a monetary value, and residents can pay the difference if items are overweight o Although a small percentage of residents request vouchers, those who use vouchers are satisfied with program  Potential Strategy: Suisun residents are given gate pass vouchers twice a year. County Board of Supervisors District 2 Discussion Topics  Suggestion to improve existing strategy: Community Clean Up and on‐call pick‐up rules should be more standardized and agencies should try and make things less complicated with less complexities/rules. o When moving means you change franchises, could mean a completely new process and set of procedures o Recycling properly is becoming more and more complicated; which may lead to more illegal dumping M:\Illegal Dumping Think Tank\Think Tank_Forum Follow‐up\2019\Collaborative Strategies City Meeting 2.25.2019\Meeting Summary Collaborative Strategies for Reducing Illegal Dumping.docx Table 1 - Strategies to Combat Illegal Dumping—Existing and Recommended for Funding, June 2019&EVDBUF1SFWFOU$MFBOVQ&OGPSDF#StrategiesOnly if #Estimated County Costs for Existing (annual unless noted otherwise)Funding Needed to Implement (if existing budgets are not sufficient)Dept.EXISTING - NO PROPOSED CHANGES1Countywide Recycling Hotline & Website - Legal options to discard unwanted items/trash$40,000 DCD2Printed Outreach Materials by Franchise Haulers - Annual Mailer/Newsletters, Bill Inserts & Bill Messages.Garbage RatesDCDEXPAND - PROPOSED CHANGE TO EXISTING3Educate persons living or working in the unincorporated area that only hauling companies approved by the County (permitted or franchised) can legally be hired to pick-up trash.unknown existing budgets CCEH, DCD4Seek additional opportunities to raise awareness about and increase utilization of the Bulky Item Pick-up services and/or extra waste pick-ups offered upon request at no additional charge for residential customers within the County's unincorporated franchise areas.Garbage Ratesexisting budget DCDNEW 5Create public outreach campaign(s) with messaging that is effective for applicable target populations (may need carrot & stick since some respond better to one vs. the other) that can be deployed using these various methods: * Curbside haulers – Mail/Robo-calls/E-Blasts/Direct Face-to-Face or Phone contact * Supervisors’ offices – Newsletters/E-Blasts/Direct Face-to-Face or Phone contact * On-line – Social Media (posts & ads) and Digital (internet ads) * Web/Mobile App - Curbside and local reuse & recycling services/facilities * News Media – Print, Radio & TV * Word-of-Mouth (most effective) – Engage community leaders/members/groups to raise awareness (including Youth – e.g. boy/girl scouts, Seniors, Community based non-profit organizations and Religious & philanthropic groups) $10,000 (production costs, not staff)CCEH, PWD, DCD, SOEDUCATE Page 1 of 7 M:\Illegal Dumping Think Tank\Think Tank_Forum Follow-up\Board Meeting\June 2019\Updated Strategy Table for Slides_June2019.xlsx Table 1 - Strategies to Combat Illegal Dumping—Existing and Recommended for Funding, June 2019&EVDBUF1SFWFOU$MFBOVQ&OGPSDF#StrategiesOnly if #Estimated County Costs for Existing (annual unless noted otherwise)Funding Needed to Implement (if existing budgets are not sufficient)Dept.EXISTING - NO PROPOSED CHANGES6 Fencing off road right-of-way dumping hot spot if/when deemed necessary $50,000 PWD7 Franchise Hauler provided Community Clean-up BoxesGarbage RatesDCD8Franchise Hauler provided On-call Extra Bagged/Bundled Pick-ups for residential customers (not available to mutli-family)Garbage RatesDCD9Franchise Hauler provided On-call Bulky Item Pick-ups for residential customers in three of the four County Franchise areas (not available to mutli-family)Garbage RatesDCD10 CalGreen Mandatory Waste/Recycling Tracking & Reporting for covered projects $200,000 DCD11Coordinate with Resource Conservation District about grant awarded for rural illegal dumping site abatement (for agricultural lands) unknown DCDEXPAND - PROPOSED CHANGE TO EXISTING12Mandatory Subscription Ordinance - Expand current complaint based enforcement to proactive enforcement using franchise hauler provided listsunknown$58,000 CCEH13Implement lien process provided for under the County's Mandatory Subscription Ordinance to provide for recovery of costs resulting from forced starts.$75,000 existing budget CCEH14Seek allowance to use portion of future waste tire enforcement grant funding to subsidize Waste Tire Amnesty Day.unknown grant funded CCEH15Establish and enforce extended producer responsibility ordinances - Require businesses that make/sell items that are commonly dumped or costly and challenging to dispose of properly to accept old items at the end of product life.unknown existing budget CCEH, DCD16Maximize existing creek clean-up and/or community clean-up opportunities - Evaluate existing and past usage of clean-up boxes provided for in the County's Franchises to target usage where need is the greatest for maximum effectiveness. Garbage Ratesexisting budget DCD, PWD 17Implement additional community clean-ups - Identify where additional clean-ups may be needed/warranted and seek to arrange clean-up box services through the applicable County franchise hauler or seek assistance through applicable agency where the County does not control the Franchise. (Future Phase)Garbage Rates Increase RatesDCD18 Seek additional free e-waste pick-up options (Curbside Haulers or Free Recyclers) Garbage RatesTBD DCDPREVENTPage 2 of 7 M:\Illegal Dumping Think Tank\Think Tank_Forum Follow-up\Board Meeting\June 2019\Updated Strategy Table for Slides_June2019.xlsx Table 1 - Strategies to Combat Illegal Dumping—Existing and Recommended for Funding, June 2019&EVDBUF1SFWFOU$MFBOVQ&OGPSDF#StrategiesOnly if #Estimated County Costs for Existing (annual unless noted otherwise)Funding Needed to Implement (if existing budgets are not sufficient)Dept.NEW 19Explore amending the County's Mandatory Subscription Ordinance to streamline process for forcing service starts and facilitating lien as means of reimbursing hauler for mandated services without County having to incur cost first.existing budget CCEH20Offer option of disposal vouchers in lieu of on-call pick-ups for those who prefer. (Future Phase)Increase RatesDCD21Subsidize free disposal vouchers or free disposal day at landfill/transfer station.(Future Phase)Increase RatesDCD22Explore switching some on-call pick-ups for extra bagged waste to scheduled clean-up days to increase participation..Increase RatesDCD23Seek to identify local disposal option for treated wood self-hauled by the general public; more being dumped since in-County Transfer Stations don't accept it. Closest option for public self-haul is in Livermore. existing budget DCD24Seek to identify feasible options for proper disposal of unwanted Recreational Vehicles, Trailers & Boats. existing budget DCD, SO25Secure commitment(s) to establish free local recycling drop-off sites for mattresses and box springs through participation in the statewide Bye Bye Mattress program - Work with transfer stations and/or other appropriate sites/operators, consistent with neighboring counties.TBD DCD, PWD 26Install street signs with info about How To Report posted at key entry ways or at/near dumping Hot Spots so people are reminded how to take the desired action. (Initial Phase - 50 signs @ $200/each)45$10,000 (Initial phase)PWD27Identify capital improvements that may be needed, such as street lighting or barricades. Initial Phase - Currently developing initial phase targeting Bay Point, involves 10 street lights in two specific areas.$100,000 (Initial phase)PWDPREVENTPage 3 of 7 M:\Illegal Dumping Think Tank\Think Tank_Forum Follow-up\Board Meeting\June 2019\Updated Strategy Table for Slides_June2019.xlsx Table 1 - Strategies to Combat Illegal Dumping—Existing and Recommended for Funding, June 2019&EVDBUF1SFWFOU$MFBOVQ&OGPSDF#StrategiesOnly if #Estimated County Costs for Existing (annual unless noted otherwise)Funding Needed to Implement (if existing budgets are not sufficient)Dept.EXISTING - NO PROPOSED CHANGES28 Blow & Flow Litter Removal (Roads & Creeks) $500,000 PWD29 Street Sweeping$300,000 PWD30 Volunteer driven litter removal/consolidation through the Adopt-a-Road Program $5,000 PWD31Solid Waste Facility Operator Off-site Litter/Debris Removal: North Richmond Hot Spot Crew Weekday Route & Routine Litter Policing by Transfer Stations & LandfillGate RatesDCD32Sheriff’s Office: Building community trust & pride in Bay Point by assisting with removal of illegal dumping (free disposal at Transfer Station outside Martinez)$30,000 SOEXPAND - PROPOSED CHANGE TO EXISTING33Assist with hauling and removal of waste tire piles illegally dumped in the public right-of-way on an as needed basis. CCEH staff will haul away piles of up to 35 waste tires, however they can partner with the local conservation corps to clean-up large waste tire piles (36 waste tires or more) illegally dumped on public lands.unknown grant funded CCEH34Franchise Hauler provided On-call Right-of-Way Debris Removal: Establish service in the one County Franchise area not currently implemented -and- Increase area (currently in place for three of the County's four Franchises) and potential scope/frequencyGarbage Rates Increase RatesDCD35Public Works: Dumping in creeks, roadways outside County Franchise Areas where hauler provides on-call removal service and hazardous waste or oversized items not serviced by the Franchisees. Potential for increasing removal frequency within the existing budget ($400K) is dependent upon reducing the area Public Works is responsible for (limit to areas outside County Franchise authority).34 $627,000existing budget (only if 34)PWD36Utilize and make available on-line reporting tool to supplement 1-800-No-Dumping tip line to make it easy for people to report illegally dumped waste in the right-of-way, including ability to upload photos and location coordinates. (Currently pilot testing)unknown existing budget PWD37 Coordinate/support more volunteer creek clean-ups if needed. (Future Phase)unknown TBD PWD, DCD38 Expand the volunteer Adopt-a-Road program to include adopting spots/blocks. $0 existing budget PWDCLEAN-UPPage 4 of 7 M:\Illegal Dumping Think Tank\Think Tank_Forum Follow-up\Board Meeting\June 2019\Updated Strategy Table for Slides_June2019.xlsx Table 1 - Strategies to Combat Illegal Dumping—Existing and Recommended for Funding, June 2019&EVDBUF1SFWFOU$MFBOVQ&OGPSDF#StrategiesOnly if #Estimated County Costs for Existing (annual unless noted otherwise)Funding Needed to Implement (if existing budgets are not sufficient)Dept.NEW 39Explore how Franchise Haulers might assist with cleaning up illegal dumping in areas beyond the road right-of-way.Increase RatesPWD, DCD40Make arrangements with abatement contractors/towing companies for removal of the approximate 48-50 derelict boats/RVs that have been identified by Sherriff’s Office.$150,000 (recently approved one-time allocation)CCEH, DCD, PWD, SOEXISTING - NO PROPOSED CHANGES41Regulate Solid Waste Haulers & Facilities: Oversee Non-Franchise Waste Hauler Permitting (County Code Chapter 418-2) and Enforce State Minimum Standards for Solid Waste Faciliites: Illegal Transfer Stations. Continue working with potentially interested cities and encourage remaining cities to pursue adoption of model ordinance designating the CCEH as City's enforcement agency. Advocate for statewide law requiring all waste hauling services to be regulated by permit.Disposal FeeCCEHEXPAND - PROPOSED CHANGE TO EXISTING42 Proactively go after uncovered loads on the road and parked on street. 45 unknownexisting budget (if 45 funded)SO, CHP43Establish process for identifying and using any address containing evidence located in illegally dumped waste to contact the potentially responsible party in order to find out if there is cause for further investigation, encourage them to remove the material to avoid further follow-up regarding the matter and/or simply inform them that enforcement resources are dedicated to this issue and will be aware of and follow-up if found to recur.45 unknownexisting budget (if 45 funded)DCD, PWD, CCEH, SO, DA44Establish process and parameters for pursuing misdemeanor conviction/penalty provided for under County Code Chapter 418-7 for persons hauling waste routinely generated from unincorporated residences & commercial establishments.45 $0 existing budget (if 45 funded)DCD, SO, DAENFORCECLEAN-UPPage 5 of 7 M:\Illegal Dumping Think Tank\Think Tank_Forum Follow-up\Board Meeting\June 2019\Updated Strategy Table for Slides_June2019.xlsx Table 1 - Strategies to Combat Illegal Dumping—Existing and Recommended for Funding, June 2019&EVDBUF1SFWFOU$MFBOVQ&OGPSDF#StrategiesOnly if #Estimated County Costs for Existing (annual unless noted otherwise)Funding Needed to Implement (if existing budgets are not sufficient)Dept.NEW 45Dedicate four per-diem deputies (combined total of 3,600 hours per year; equivalent to approx 1.73 FTE) to investigating dumping crimes. $150,000 SO46Wireless high definition, license plate reader surveillance cameras with night vision, infrared & solar powered. Remote-controlled to zoom and capture evidence – Place at key entry ways or at/near hot spots. PILOT: Initial six month pilot of surveillance monitoring service for five rental cameras.45$50,000 (6 month pilot)CCEH, DA, PWD, SO47Establish a well-publicized tip line, mobile app and/or other user-friendly alternative to make it easy for witnesses to report illegal dumping/dumpers and share photographic evidence when applicable. (could be linked to # 36)45 existing budget PWD, SO48Utilize centralized database to capture details related to illegal dumping found to contain address containing evidence as a means of identifying patterns and recurrences (unpermitted hauler hired by different persons at different times, same one-time excuse used in the past, etc.) for subsequent/future investigations, stings, camera installation, etc.45 existing budgetCCEH, DA, DCD, PWD, SO49Explore options to seek legal authority to charge persons responsible for illegally dumping non-commercial quantities guilty of a misdemeanor rather than simply an infraction. 45 TBD SO, DCD50Explore potential for obtaining legal authority to allow for impoundment and/or seizure of vehicles used to illegally dump.45 TBD SO, DCD51Work through the Board of Supervisors legislative platform process and/or explore partnering with coalition of other governmental agencies in the region to propose legislation to allow for increased penalty for illegal dumping of non-commercial quantities (less than 1 cubic yard) , including higher fines, change from infraction to a misdemeanor, mandatory community service time, or jail time.45 TBD BoSENFORCEPage 6 of 7 M:\Illegal Dumping Think Tank\Think Tank_Forum Follow-up\Board Meeting\June 2019\Updated Strategy Table for Slides_June2019.xlsx Table 1 - Strategies to Combat Illegal Dumping—Existing and Recommended for Funding, June 2019&EVDBUF1SFWFOU$MFBOVQ&OGPSDF#StrategiesOnly if #Estimated County Costs for Existing (annual unless noted otherwise)Funding Needed to Implement (if existing budgets are not sufficient)Dept.52Request courts to impose appropriate sentences (fines and community service to clean up illegal dumping elsewhere) of people convicted of illegal dumping. 45 existing budget DA53 Dedicate prosecutor resources to prosecuting dumping crimes. 45 existing budget DA54Use mapping (GIS) to track dumping hot spots to target use of enforcement tools/investigative resources.45 existing budget PWD, DCD 55Use sting operations targeting specific types of dumping crimes/violations or locations/days & times of day.45existing budget (if 45 funded)SOOTHER56Continue holding interdepartmental "Think Tank" team coordination meetings quarterly, as needed, in 2019. On-going coordination with cities to facilitate information sharing and collaboration opportunities (e.g. maintain/utilize countywide e-mail list, convene meetings as needed, etc.)existing budget CCEH, DA, DCD, PWD, SOTotals$1,827,000$378,000ENFORCEPage 7 of 7 M:\Illegal Dumping Think Tank\Think Tank_Forum Follow-up\Board Meeting\June 2019\Updated Strategy Table for Slides_June2019.xlsx 1 THINKTANKCounty Interdepartmental Illegal Dumping Think Tank TeamInterdepartmental team was formed to discuss the problem, share experiences, examine lessons learned from here and elsewhere and develop preliminary recommendations on how to improve efforts to reduce illegal dumping.2TEAM MEMBERSEnvironmental HealthKristian Lucas, Marilyn Underwood District Attorney’s Office Stacey Grassini, Mike McLaughlinSheriff’s OfficeBrian Vanderlind, Paul O'Mary, Joseph Buford, John Lowden, Steve BorbelyConservation & DevelopmentJohn Kopchik, Deidra Dingman, Joe Losado, Jo-Anmarie RicasataPublic Works Brian Balbas, Joe Yee, Chris Lau, Tim Jensen, Michelle Cordis THINKTANK3At the October 23, 2018 meeting, the Board accepted the report from the interdepartmental team and requested that it:Reach out to neighboring jurisdictions and franchise haulers to solicit additional input to refine the preliminary presentation and recommendations Collaborate with Alameda County on shared legislative priorities related to illegal dumpingExplore opportunities for increasing effectiveness of the waste hauler ordinance Pursue opportunities to have franchise hauling companies offer the public additional, more frequent pick-up options Board Direction on October 23, 2018 THINKTANKFebruary 2019 Meeting SummaryApproximately 35 people attended including representatives from 10 cities: Antioch, Clayton, Concord, El Cerrito, Hercules, Oakley, Pittsburg, Richmond, San Pablo, and Walnut CreekThe County presented strategies from each of the 4 sections of strategies: EDUCATE(Public Outreach Campaign), PREVENT(Mandatory Garbage Service, Free Mattress Drop-Off), CLEANUP(Right-of-way Debris Removal), and ENFORCE(Law Enforcement Investigation, Surveillance Cameras, Legislative Action)City representatives were generally in favor of the presented strategies and shared similar strategies that their respective jurisdiction have implementedCity representatives expressed interest in staying connected, and County staff agreed to create an email distribution list for participants to share updates with each other and convene future meetings, as neededTHINKTANK4Coordination with Cities THINKTANKTHINKTANK5Coordination with HaulersSolicited and received input about the recommended strategies from each of the County's Franchise HaulersFranchise haulers expressed general support for the recommendationsFranchise haulers and staff agree that it would be best to implement strategies in phases in conjunction with established rate setting cycles so the impact to rates can be evaluated independently and spread over timeWill continue working with each Franchise Hauler to prioritize strategies based on franchise-specific needs and circumstances in order to maximize potential effectivenessContinuing active discussions with the one Franchise Hauler as part of its ‘Base Year’ rate setting cycle about the highest priority strategies for that service area THINKTANKTHINKTANK6Coordination with Alameda CountyWorking together to pursue legislation that address shared needs to more effectively address illegal dumping, consistent with the following sponsored-legislation proposal from the County’s adopted 2019 State Platform :Seek legislation, in conjunction with Alameda County and other partners, and support legislation that specifically establishes statewide hauler permitting requirements and associated penalties as well as increases penalties allowed by State law for illegal dumping.2019 State Platform also includes the following related policy (consistent with AB 215 & SB 409):SUPPORT efforts that will help counties more effectively combat illegal dumping, including but not limited to establishing a more reasonable burden of proof standard, changing any remaining infractions to misdemeanors and increasing penalty amounts or options (e.g. vehicle seizure). THINKTANKCollaborative Legislative EffortsInterdepartmental team recommended and the Legislation Committee approved recommending to the Board of Supervisors a position of "Support" on three bills related to illegal dumping: AB 215 (Mathis), SB 409 (Wilk), and AB 1216 (Bauer-Kahan). Two bills no longer moving forward:AB 215 (increased penalty for fourth dumping violation) AB 1216 (sponsored-legislation proposal specific to Alameda and Contra Costa counties which would have help fund law enforcement positions for one year). On June 11, 2019 the Board will consider the Legislation Committee's recommendation to support SB 409, which: (1) expands the crime of illegal dumping to include the transporting of waste matter for the purpose of dumping; (2) makes it a crime to dump, deposit or receive waste matter on private property with owner consent without any required permit/license; (3) increases the fines for illegal dumping; and (4) makes it illegal to transport commercial quantities to dump in specified locations.7 THINKTANK4 Prong Approach to Reduce Illegal Dumping8EducateEducateEnforceEnforcePreventPreventClean-Up THINKTANK9Highlights of 4 Prong Approach: Educate$10,000(production costs, not staff)Create public outreach campaign(s) with different messaging:Educate people about proper disposal optionsProvide guidance about reporting dumping - what is needed from witnesses and desired type(s) of evidence Publicize enforcement successesOutreach to be deployed using these various methods.5. PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN THINKTANKHighlights of 4 Prong Approach: Prevent10$58,000 Expand current complaint based enforcement to proactive enforcement using franchise hauler provided lists.Implement lien process provided for in County Code to provide for recovery of costs resulting from forced starts.Explore amending the County's Mandatory Subscription Ordinance (Chapter 418-6) to allow for placement of tax liens to reimburse hauler for providing mandated services without County having to incur the expense first.12,13 & 19. MANDATORY GARBAGE SERVICE THINKTANKHighlights of 4 Prong Approach: Prevent11$10,000 Install up to 50 street signs with information about how to report illegal dumping at key entry ways or at/near dumping Hot Spots so people are reminded how to take the desired action. 26. STREET SIGNSIdentify capital improvements that may be needed, such as street lighting or barricades. (Initial Phase - Currently developing initial phase targeting Bay Point, involves 10 street lights in two specific areas.)$100,00027. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS THINKTANKHighlights of 4 Prong Approach: Clean Up12On-call Right-of-Way Debris Removal by Franchise Haulers: Increase area (currently in place for three of the County's four Franchises) and potential scope/frequency.On-call Right-of-Way Debris Removal by Public Works: Dumping in creeks, roadways outside County Franchise Areas where hauler provides on-call removal service and hazardous waste or oversized items not serviced by the Franchisees. Potential for increasing removal frequency within the existing budget is dependent upon reducing the area Public Works is responsible for (limit to areas outside County Franchise authority).34 & 35. RIGHT-OF-WAY CLEAN-UPExisting budget (if 34)Future Garbage Rate Review THINKTANKHighlights of 4 Prong Approach: Enforce1345. LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATORSWireless high definition, license plate reader surveillance cameras with night vision, infrared & solar powered. Remote-controlled to zoom and capture evidence – Place at key entry ways or at/near hot spots. PILOT: Initial six month pilot of surveillance monitoring service for five rental cameras.46. SURVEILLANCE CAMERASDedicate four per-diem law enforcement deputies to investigating dumping crimes. (approx. 3600 hours/year)$150,000$50,000 THINKTANK4 Prong Approach: Strategy Summary(14) Existing + (42) Recommended Strategies = 56 Total22 covered by existing county budget,2 funded by grants6 require rate increases6 to be determined (future phase)6 require allocation of new fundingEstimated Annual Cost for Existing Strategies = $1,827,000New Funding Needed to Implement Recommended = $378,000Educate(5 Strategies) = 2 Existing + 3 Recommended (Expand -2 & New -1)$10,000 Prevent(22 Strategies) = 6 Existing + 16 Recommended (Expand-7 & New-9) $168,000 Clean Up(13 Strategies) = 5 Existing + 8 Recommended (Expand- 6 & New -2)$0Enforce(15 Strategies)= 1 Existing + 14 Recommended (Expand-3 & New-11)$200,000Other(1 Strategy) = 1 Recommended (New)$014 1 THINK TANKIllegal Dumping “Think Tank” County Interdepartmental Team Interdepartmental team was formed to discuss the problem, share experiences, examine lessons learned from here and elsewhere and development preliminary recommendations on how to improve efforts to reduce illegal dumping.2 TEAM MEMBERS Environmental Health Kristian Lucas, Marilyn Underwood District Attorney’s Office Stacey Grassini, Mike McLaughlin Sheriff’s Office Brian Vanderlind, Paul O'Mary, Joseph Buford, John Lowden, Steve Borbely Conservation & Development John Kopchik, Deidra Dingman, Joe Losado,David Brockbank, Jo-Anmarie Ricasata Public Works Mike Carlson, Joe Yee, Chris Lau, Tim Jensen, Michelle Cordis THINK TANKWhat is Illegal Dumping? Illegal dumping is the act of disposing solid waste at a location that is not a permitted solid waste disposal facility. Illegal dumping poses significant social, environmental, and economic impacts to our county and community. 3 THINK TANK Impacts of Illegal Dumping (1 of 4) 1. Community Blight –A Downward Spiral http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/01/text/0076910.htm (Illegal Dumping Prevention Guidebook US EPA Region 5) THINK TANK 4 THINK TANK 2. Health Risks and Safety Hazards Hazardous Materials Physical Hazards http://infohouse.p2ric.org/ref/01/text/0076910.htm (Illegal Dumping Prevention Guidebook US EPA Region 5) THINK TANK 5 Pests Contamination Impacts of Illegal Dumping (2 of 4) THINK TANK THINK TANK 6 Environmental Impacts of Illegal Dumping Waste ends up in streams and in the Bay Illegal dumping causes harm to wildlife and their habitat Parks and open space fouled by illegal dumping Flooding caused by debris/wastes that clog storm water management systems Pollutants carried by smoke from dump fires Impacts of Illegal Dumping (3 of 4) THINK TANK 7 $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 Clean-up Costs for Dumping in the Right-of-Way* Estimated Clean Water Program Costs for Litter & Minor Dumping Estimated Public Works Costs for Illegal Dumping in Public Right of Way Impacts of Illegal Dumping (4 of 4) * Does not include funding spent for creek clean-ups or franchise hauler efforts THINK TANK Where is this happening? Right-of-Way Dumping Reported in 2017 THINK TANK 8 THINK TANK Who’s the culprit?THINK TANK RESIDENTS Unpermitted Haulers Local residents, rental move outs and DIY home improvements, (notice to abate), mattress and appliance upgrades Top 5 Most Commonly Dumped Items:1.Household Garbage2.Furniture 3.Mattresses 4.Appliances 5.E-waste, Vehicles/Boats and Hazardous Wastes 9 THINK TANK THINK TANK BUSINESSES Unpermitted Haulers Illegal Transfer Stations & Scrap Yards Some Automobile and Tire Repair Shops Some Landscapers and Contractors Items most commonly dumped Yard Waste Construction Debris Tires 10 Who’s the culprit? THINK TANKPeople Behaving Badly –Video Example CCC Watersheds (Alhambra Creek) –March 2018 http://www.kron4.com/features/people-behaving-badly/people-behaving-badly-the- trashing-of-bay-area-watersheds-in-contra-costa-county/1035744704 THINK TANK 11 THINK TANK THINK TANK Save Money Cost Avoidance Convenience Few or no local alternatives 12 “I Won’t Get Caught” -Low risk of getting penalized. -If you do get caught then Low fines, minimal penalties -Still better off paying a few fines, then paying to dispose properly every time. “I Hired The Wrong People.” Use of Unpermitted haulers (lack of public awareness of the issue, Lack of awareness of risk and consequences (impacts caused) “I didn’t know about free and easy alternatives.” Lack of public awareness of proper disposal options available Why is this happening? THINK TANK Why is this happening? Marin County conducted a public, in-person survey to gather public perception to help tailor outreach for its Illegal Dumping problem. THINK TANK 13 Survey Question: What would most likely prevent you from taking large items like mattresses and furniture to the dump?No way to transport 49% Cost too much 38% We take it to the dump 13% THINK TANK Cost to Properly Dispose of 1 Cubic Yard 14 2 Twin Mattresses Cost of Disposal: $50-$68.50 ½ Large Sofa Cost of Disposal: $25-$34.25 7 Large Trash Bags Cost of Disposal: $31.77 Construction Debris Cost of Disposal: $31.10 -----Pickup Truck Loaded 1 ft. Deep. Cost of Disposal: $25-$34.25 Yard Waste Cost of Disposal: $29.03 THINK TANKCost of Disposal vs. Fines 15 Item (yd 3 =Cubic Yards) Average Cost of Proper Disposal Fine Amount (and subsequent penalties) Average Public Works Disposal Cost Less than 1 yd 3 Non-Hazardous $31.77 (free pick-up maybe available)$250 –1,000 (1st offense) $500 –1,500 (2nd offense) $750 –3,000 (3rd offense) (double fines if tires)Average disposal cost for 1 yd3 of illegally dumped waste is $258 1 Mattress $25-$34.25 (free pick-up maybe available) <1 yd 3 Yard Waste $29.03 (free pick-up maybe available) More than 1 yd 3 Trash $63.54 (free pick-up maybe available) $1,000 –3,000 (1st offense) $3,000 –6,000 (2nd offense) $6,000 –10,000 (3rd offense) Plus Jail Time and/or Community Service if dumping Hazardous Material, or dumping near Waterways 2 yd 3 Construction Debris $62.20 THINK TANKSteadily Increasing…THINK TANK 16 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Reports of Illegal Dumping in the Right-of-Way Submitted for Clean Up Public Works RSS AlliedNumber of Reports THINK TANKSteadily Increasing…THINK TANK 17 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Reported Illegal Dumping Clean-ups in the Right-of-Way NR Hot Spot Crew Per Year Combined Total (Public Works, RSS, Allied, and NR Hot Spot Crew)Number of Reports THINK TANKSheriff leads effort in Bay Point Illegal dumping is so severe that at times it spills out onto the sidewalks and streets. Rodents take up homestead in abandoned mattresses, box springs, couches, household appliances etc. Sitting piles cause the infestation spread to local residences. More importantly, many Bay Point youths walk to school and must walk around the trash piles or cross the street to avoid harm. Recognizing the health hazards, the trash piles presents to the residents, and the blight it brings to the community, the Office of the Sheriff entered into an agreement with Republic Services that allows us to dispose of illegal dumping at the Martinez Transfer Station at no cost. In less than a year Bay Point Blight Program picked up over 13 tons of trash. 18 THINK TANKCase Study–Alameda County Education, Eradication & Enforcement Road Map Convened an Illegal Dumping Working Group to address illegal dumping as a regional problem. Participants include Alameda County DA’s office, Sheriff, Public Works, Environmental Health, City of Oakland, Community Based Organizations, Representatives from Federal and State offices. Coordinated presentations/discussions with City of Vallejo, City of San Jose, California Product Stewardship Council, Mattress Recycling Council Met with members of Bay Area legislative delegation i.e. Asm. Bonta, Asm. Quirk, Senator Skinner and Sen. Wieckowski to work with Alameda County to create a California legislative road map to discuss: Increase in fines/penalties for dumping illegally, Identify financial resources to sustain impact programs Joint press conference w/Mayor of Oakland –announced Adopt an Illegal Dumping Hot Spot Pilot Invite other regional jurisdictions i.e. Contra Costa to join forces to combat illegal dumping. (illegal dumping knows no boundary campaign) 19 THINK TANKCase Study: City of Vallejo City recently launched a multi-pronged program which is proving to be effective in helping combat illegal dumping. Although still early in its implementation, City has already had 4 successful prosecutions. Comprehensive Public Outreach Campaign including door hangers, website and hot spot letters with messaging about resources for proper disposal launch of criminal enforcement program penalty if prosecuted for illegal dumping hotline and website/app to reporting dumping what evidence needed for successful prosecution tips to protect your property from dumping Strengthened City Ordinance Dedicated Enforcement Personnel High-definition surveillance cameras with 24-hour monitoring service Limiting Access to Hot Spots using Temporary Road Closures 20 THINK TANKCase Study: Butte County Comprehensive Unlawful Dumping Program Key Program Elements: Adopted County Ordinance in January 2005. Hired a Code Enforcement Officer was to administer program. Established program to seize vehicles used to dump illegally. Launched Illegal Dumping Hotline too report illegal dumping. Multi-media public education campaign Developed GIS database developed in house to track dumping hot spots Maintain in-house case tracking database to manage and track cases By December 2006, Butte County experienced a huge decrease in “Reported Illegal Dumping Cases with Evidence” THINK TANK 21 THINK TANKCase Study: City of San Jose 22 Innovative Multilingual Outreach with Dual Messaging – Junk Pickup Program & Reporting Dumping “You’ve been selected to receive a FREE large item removal!” The City of San Jose spends $87 each time someone improperly disposes a large item. Do it the right way for FREE. THINK TANKCase Study: City of San Jose 23 Junk Pickup Program THINK TANKHow do we measure program success? 24Example: City of San Jose THINK TANKKey Observations 1) Dumping is driven by the perception that it is much cheaper to dump illegally than legally. 25 Lack of awareness about bulky waste pick-up Lack of fear about being caught Lack of fear about cost to be paid if one is caught THINK TANK 2) Broken window theory applies to Illegal Dumping Piles of illegally dumped waste sometimes act as magnets for more dumping Suggests alternative course of action to would be dumpers rather than proper disposal Perception that it’s a safe place to dump (can get away with it) 26 Key Observations THINK TANK 3) Enabling theory also applies to illegal dumping 27 Key Observations Hot Spot Crew patrols North Richmond EVERY WEEKDAY removing illegally dumped waste from roadways, chronic localized dumping continues with no end in sight. More is then dumped overnight, often found in spots that were cleaned up earlier that day Of the nearly 1,300 addresses found in waste illegally dumped in North Richmond over a five year period, about 84% were local addresses, meaning close enough to see how quickly dumping gets removed. Break the Enabling Cycle -Clean-up programs need to be complimented by education and enforcement, such as gathering and tracking identifying evidence to counter this perception and enforce consequences. THINK TANK 28 Key Observations 4) The True Cost of Illegal Dumping $31.77 $258 1cy Proper Disposal 1cy Public Works Clean Up Much more expensive for public to clean-up and dispose of materials after they are illegally dumped than it would be if those items were be disposed of through proper channels. THINK TANKKey Observations 5) Identifying, charging and prosecuting perpetrators of illegal dumping is complicated and time-consuming and, under current conditions, can sometimes provide a low-return on investment. -Difficult for public to report -Difficult to positively ID without dedicated investigation -Existing penalties do not provide adequate deterrent 29 THINK TANKKey Observations Cameras in one area push dumping to another Problem often resurfaces in cleaned-up areas One agency’s success can push the problem elsewhere 6) Dumping problem has a tendency to pop-up somewhere else rather than ceasing all together 30 THINK TANKKey Observations 7) Broad, consistently implemented, multi- pronged strategy is key to long-term progress For individual mechanisms to be successful, strategies must be consistently implemented as part of a joint interdepartmental approach; no weak links. 31 THINK TANKCountywide Collection Service Authority by Population 32 Incorporated Cities Non-County Franchises County Administered Franchise Collection Service for 85% of 1.1M County population is administered by incorporated cities County Administers Collection Services for only 8% of Countywide population. This limits the scope and effectiveness of strategies reliant on franchise hauling services. THINK TANK Authority for Solid Waste Collection in the Unincorporated County 33 THINK TANK 4 Prong Approach to Reduce Illegal Dumping 34 Educate Enforce Prevent Clean-Up THINK TANK 35 Highlights of 4 Prong Approach: Educate $10,000 (production costs, not staff) Create public outreach campaign(s) with different messaging: Educate people about proper disposal options Provide guidance about reporting dumping -what is needed from witnesses and desired type(s) of evidence Publicize enforcement successes Outreach to be deployed using these various methods. 5. PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN THINK TANK Highlights of 4 Prong Approach: Prevent 36 $58,000 Expand current complaint based enforcement to proactive enforcement using franchise hauler provided lists. Implement lien process provided for in County Code to provide for recovery of costs resulting from forced starts. Explore amending the County's Mandatory Subscription Ordinance (Chapter 418-6) to allow for placement of tax liens to reimburse hauler for providing mandated services without County having to incur the expense first . 12,13 & 19. MANDATORY GARBAGE SERVICE Secure commitment(s) to establish free local recycling drop-off sites for mattresses and box springs through participation in the statewide Bye Bye Mattress program 25. FREE MATTRESS RECYCLING To be determined THINK TANK Highlights of 4 Prong Approach: Clean Up 37 On-call Right-of-Way Debris Removal by Franchise Haulers: Increase area (currently in place for three of the County's four Franchises) and potential scope/frequency. On-call Right-of-Way Debris Removal by Public Works: Dumping in creeks, roadways outside County Franchise Areas where hauler provides on-call removal service and hazardous waste or oversized items not serviced by the Franchisees. Potential for increasing removal frequency within the existing budget is dependent upon reducing the area Public Works is responsible for (limit to areas outside County Franchise authority). 34 & 35. RIGHT-OF-WAY CLEAN-UP Existing budget (if 34) Increase rates THINK TANK Highlights of 4 Prong Approach: Enforce 38 45. LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATORS Wireless high definition, license plate reader surveillance cameras with night vision, infrared & solar powered. Remote-controlled to zoom and capture evidence –Place at key entry ways or at/near hot spots. PILOT: Initial six month pilot of surveillance monitoring service for five rental cameras. 46. SURVEILLANCE CAMERAS Dedicate two law enforcement deputies to investigating dumping crimes. $566,000 $50,000 THINK TANK4 Prong Approach: Strategy Summary (14) Existing + (42) Recommended Strategies = 56 Total 21 covered by existing county budget, 2 funded by grants 6 require rate increases 6 to be determined (future phase) 7 require allocation of new funding Estimated Annual Cost for Existing Strategies =$1,827,000 New Funding Needed to Implement Recommended = $944,000 Educate (5 Strategies) = 2 Existing + 3 Recommended (Expand -2 & New -1)$10,000 Prevent (22 Strategies) = 6 Existing + 16 Recommended (Expand-7 & New-9) $168,000 Clean Up (13 Strategies) = 5 Existing + 8 Recommended (Expand-6 & New -2)$150,000 Enforce (15 Strategies)= 1 Existing + 14 Recommended (Expand-3 & New-11)$616,000 Other (1 Strategy) = 1 Recommended (New)$0 39 THINK TANKNext Steps 1.Gather initial feedback and guidance from Board of Supervisors on preliminary recommendations and potential strategies to better address illegal dumping. 2.Seek input from neighboring jurisdictions, other public agencies, franchise haulers and other stakeholders about the preliminary presentation and recommendations. 3.Report to Board of Supervisors in 2019 for Board consideration of recommendations. THINK TANK 40 RECOMMENDATION(S): Regarding the matter of the contract for federal advocacy services for the period beginning July 1, 2019, the Board of Supervisors may consider the following options: AWARD the contract to Federal Advocates Inc. in the amount of $360,000 for the period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022, as recommended by the County Selection Committee (CSC), acknowledging there was not a unanimous recommendation for this contractor from the Legislation Committee at its May 13, 2019 meeting; or 1. REJECT the recommendation from the CSC and CONSIDER a contract award for the period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022 from the other qualified responders: Alcalde & Fay and Smith Dawson & Andrews; or 2. REJECT the recommendation from the CSC; CANCEL this procurement process; EXTEND the current contractor (Alcalde & Fay) through December 31, 2019 and DIRECT staff to conduct another procurement process in the fall of 2019; or 3. REJECT the recommendation from the CSC; CANCEL this procurement process, and forego federal advocacy services after June 30, 2019 until the Board determines they are necessary. 4. If a new procurement process is directed, provide direction to staff on the rating/recommendation process: Should the Legislation Committee be the review panel (which would necessitate a public process), or should another County Selection Committee be established, and if so,who should comprise that panel. 5. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: D.11 To:Board of Supervisors From:LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Federal Advocacy Contract RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) FISCAL IMPACT: The proposal from Federal Advocates Inc. provides a monthly retainer of $10,000 for the three-year period of the contract. The contract is budgeted in the County Administrator' Office. (100% General Fund.) BACKGROUND: At its August 13, 2018 meeting, the Legislation Committee directed CAO staff to conduct a procurement process for the State and Federal Advocacy Services contracts for the period FY 2019/20 through FY 2021/22, with two single-year options to renew to the successful responder. Pursuant to this direction, CAO staff prepared and distributed the Request for Qualifications (Attachment D), which was issued on March 27, 2019 for the Federal Legislative Advocacy Services. The RFQ was posted on BidSync and distributed to all known advocates serving CSAC and UCC counties. A total of three responses were received in the County Administrator's Office by the deadline. Responses were received from the following firms: 1. Alcalde & Fay (incumbent firm) 2. Federal Advocates Inc. 3. Smith Dawson & Andrews Following the requirements of the RFQ and standard procurement processes, a County Selection Committee (CSC) was convened to review and rate the responses. The CSC was composed of the following individuals: Supervisor Diane Burgis, District II, Chair of the Legislation Committee Chief Assistant County Administrator, Timothy Ewell Employment and Human Services Director Kathy Gallagher Health Services Administrator Joshua Sullivan Water Agency Manager Ryan Hernandez The CSC convened on May 1, 2019 to score the received responses and select firms for interview. All three of the responding firms for the Federal Advocacy Services RFQ were invited to interview on May 6, 2019. Interviews were conducted over Skype. (Smith Dawson & Andrews chose the teleconference option.) Upon conclusion of the interview and proposal scoring process, the consensus of the CSC was to recommended that the contract award be made to the following: Federal Legislative Advocacy Services: Federal Advocates, Inc. Federal Advocates Inc. and all responders were notified of this contract award recommendation on May 8, 2019, The Legislation Committee considered this matter at its May 13, 2019 meeting and did not have unanimous recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. The RFQ response from Federal Advocates Inc. is Attachment A. Attachment B is a letter received from Federal Advocates Inc. Attachment C includes all other responses. The Score Sheet is Attachment E. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Public comment: Michael Esposito Rejected the recommendation of the County Selection Committee, extended the current contract with Alcalde & Fay for the period of July 1, 2019-June 30, 2020. Referred the item back to the Legislation Committee for its July meeting, with a request to return to the Board of Supervisors at a future date. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A--Federal Advocates Inc. Response Attachment B: Correspondence from Federal Advocates Inc. Attachment C--Responses Attachment D--RFQ for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Attachment E: Score Sheet for Advocacy Contract RFQs Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS No. 1902-329 For STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES Written questions about this RFQ can be submitted by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on April 3, 2019 to: lara.delaney@cao.cccounty.us Thank you in advance for your interest in this opportunity and for your efforts in preparing your response. DATE ISSUED: MARCH 27, 2019 RESPONSE DUE by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on APRIL 24, 2019 At Contra Costa County Administrator’s Office 651 Pine Street, 10th Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Attachment B COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS No. 1902-329 For STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 of 2 Page I. ACRONYM AND TERM GLOSSARY ....................................................................................... 4 II. STATEMENT OF WORK A. Intent ...................................................................................................................................... 4 B. Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 4 C. Background ........................................................................................................................... 6 D. Minimum Qualifications ........................................................................................................ 7 E. Specific Requirements .......................................................................................................... 7 F. Deliverables/Reports .............................................................................................................. 8 III. INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDERS G. Correspondence...................................................................................................................... 9 H. Calendar of Events ................................................................................................................. 9 I. Submittal of Responses ........................................................................................................ 10 J. Response Format .................................................................................................................. 11 K. Evaluation Criteria/Selection Committee ............................................................................ 11 L. Notice of Intent to Award .................................................................................................... 12 M. Disputes Relating to Proposal Process and Award ............................................................. 12 IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS N. Term / Renewal .................................................................................................................... 13 O. Pricing .................................................................................................................................. 13 P. Award ................................................................................................................................... 14 Q. Method of Ordering ............................................................................................................. 14 R. Invoicing .............................................................................................................................. 15 S. Account Manager/Support Staff .......................................................................................... 15 T. General Requirements ......................................................................................................... 15 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS No. 1902-329 For STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A – Fee Schedule Exhibit B – Response Content and Submittal Completeness Checklist Exhibit C – Standard Contract Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 4 of 15 I. ACRONYM AND TERM GLOSSARY Unless otherwise noted, the terms below may be upper or lower case. Acronyms will always be uppercase. Bidder or Responder Shall mean the specific person or entity responding to this RFQ Board Shall refer to the County of Contra Costa Board of Supervisors CAO Shall refer to the County Administrator’s Office CSC Shall refer to County Selection Committee Contractor When capitalized, shall refer to selected responder that is awarded a contract County When capitalized, shall refer to the County of Contra Costa Federal Refers to United States Federal Government, its departments and/or agencies FY Shall mean Fiscal Year Labor Code Refers to California Labor Code Proposal Shall mean responder/contractor response to this RFQ Request for Qualifications Shall mean this document, which is the County of Contra Costa’s request for contractors’/responders’ proposal to provide the services being solicited herein; also referred herein as RFQ Response or Submittal Shall refer to responder’s proposal submitted in reply to RFQ RFQ Request for Qualifications State Refers to State of California, its departments and/or agencies II. STATEMENT OF WORK A. INTENT The intent of this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is to describe state legislative advocacy and related services required by the County of Contra Costa and to solicit qualifications from experienced providers to professionally and effectively represent the County’s interests in Sacramento. The County intends to award a three-year contract with two (2) single year options to renew to the successful responder whose response conforms to the RFQ and meets the County’s requirements. B. SCOPE Contra Costa County is seeking qualifications from experienced providers of State legislative advocacy services to professionally and effectively represent the County’s interests in Sacramento. The purpose of the State legislative program is to secure legislation that benefits the County and its residents while seeking to mitigate or oppose legislation that would adversely impact the County’s delivery of service; to secure State funding through the grant and/or appropriations process; and to shape public policy in priority areas that impact County government. The successful responder will work in a proactive manner to protect and advance the County’s interests in Sacramento. This includes lobbying the State Legislature and Administration to ameliorate budget proposals that negatively affect the County’s interests and aggressively seek Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 5 of 15 opportunities to enhance the County’s budget. Services required by the County include legislative and administrative representation with members of the executive branch, members and staff of the legislature, pertinent State offices and agencies, and relevant interest groups, coalitions, and associations. The successful Contractor will meet with State authorities and represent the County’s interests as directed by the County. The legislative advocate will also work with the Board of Supervisors, the Legislation Committee, the County Administrator, department heads and/or assigned departmental staff on a legislative agenda to advance the County’s interests. This includes tracking and suggesting opportunities to change State policy in ways that will benefit residents of Contra Costa County. The Contractor shall report to the County Administrator’s Office. The CAO coordinates the County’s Legislative activities, as summarized below. 1. Annual Legislative Program The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopts an annual State Legislative Platform in January of each year1. Prior to developing this Platform, the CAO’s office invites input from all County departments, the Board of Supervisors, its subcommittees, and its advisory bodies. From this input, the State Legislative Platform is developed. The County’s State Legislative Platform includes legislative proposals and priorities, as well as the County’s position on various policy issues. The Platform is submitted to the Board of Supervisors through the County’s Legislation Committee, which typically approves the draft legislative Platform in December. The Platform is amended throughout the year as new legislative issues arise. 2. Legislation Committee In 2007, the County established the Legislation Committee as a means of coordinating the review of legislative matters of interest to the County. (The Board’s Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee reviews legislative matters related to transportation, water, and other infrastructure.) The Legislation Committee meets monthly to review the impact of State and Federal legislation on the County. The Committee receives regular updates from the County’s State and Federal legislative advocates and advises the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator on legislative matters affecting the County. 3. Issues of Particular Concern to the County The County’s Legislative Platform identifies legislative and regulatory advocacy priorities which include Health Care, Homelessness, Realignment Implementation, the State Budget, and Water and Levees/the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Of particular concern is the impact of the State Budget on the County, including the realignment of State programs to the County level. It is expected that the State legislative advocate will provide guidance to the County on these matters and strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts. 1 The Board’s adopted Platform is available at: http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/2859/Legislation Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 6 of 15 C. BACKGROUND Contra Costa County was incorporated in 1850 as one of the original 27 counties of California. A five-member Board of Supervisors, each elected to four-year terms in district nonpartisan elections, serves as the legislative body of the County, which has a general law form of government. Also elected are the County Assessor, Auditor-Controller, Clerk-Recorder, District Attorney, Sheriff-Coroner and Treasurer-Tax Collector. The County Administrator, David Twa, is appointed by the Board as the chief executive officer and directs the day-to-day government operations of the County. The County Administrator is also responsible for presenting the Board with a Recommended Budget for consideration of adoption as the Final (Adopted) Budget, which serves as the foundation of the County’s financial planning and control. Contra Costa is one of nine counties in the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Area and the ninth most populous county in California with an estimated population of 1,149,363 as of January 1, 2018. The County covers about 733 square miles and extends from the northeastern shore of the San Francisco Bay easterly about 50 miles to San Joaquin County. The County is bordered on the south and west by Alameda County and on the north by the Suisun and San Pablo Bays. The western and northern shorelines are highly industrialized, while the interior sections are suburban/residential, commercial and light industrial. The County contains 19 cities, the most populous of which include Richmond in the west (pop. 110,967); Antioch in the northeast (113,061); and Concord in the middle (129,159). The County agencies/departments include: Agriculture, Animal Services, Assessor, Auditor- Controller, Child Support Services, Clerk-Recorder, Conservation & Development, County Administrator, County Counsel, District Attorney, Employment and Human Services, Contra Costa Consolidated Fire, Health Services, Human Resources, Information Technology, Library, Probation, Public Defender, Public Works, Risk Management, Sheriff-Coroner, Treasurer-Tax Collector, and Veterans Services. The County employs approximately 9,801 permanent full-time employees. The General Fund budget for FY 2018-19 is $1.77 Billion, with a total adjusted budget, excluding Fire and special districts, for FY 2018-19 of $3.77 Billion. With respect to its State advocacy services, the County presently contracts with Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Gross & Leoni, LLP. This firm has been under contract since 2004 as the County’s state legislative advocates and receives a monthly retainer of $15,000. The contract expires on June 30, 2019. D. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS 1. Responders shall be regularly and have been continuously engaged in the business of providing State legislative advocacy to local governments for at least five (5) years (does not have to be consecutive service or with the same jurisdiction), preferably to urban county governments. 2. Responders shall have an office based in Sacramento with at least two non-clerical staff who would be assigned full-time or part-time to this contract who possess significant experience testifying at hearings before the Legislature and State agencies. Responders must submit names and resumes. Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 7 of 15 3. Responders shall have relationships with the County’s legislative delegation and their staff. Responders must provide a list of contacts and/or supporting documentation that demonstrates existing relationships. The list need not be comprehensive. 4. Responders shall have broad bipartisan relationships with State legislators, legislative staff, State agencies, and executive branch officials. Responders must provide a list of contacts or supporting documentation that demonstrates existing relationships. The list need not be comprehensive. 5. Responders shall possess the proven ability to initiate, develop, and carry out effective strategies to influence legislative and administrative activities and to effectively lobby on behalf of the County. 6. Responders shall possess all permits, licenses and professional credentials necessary to perform the required legislative advocacy services. 7. Responders’ other clients should not pose conflict of interest issues for the County, nor should their interest be in direct conflict with the County’s mission. Any response that does not demonstrate that the Responder meets these minimum requirements by the deadline to submit proposals will be considered non-responsive and will not be eligible for evaluation for award of the contract. E. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/SCOPE OF WORK The selected Responder shall advise, counsel, and represent the County in pursuing legislative initiatives and funding before the California Legislature and the Executive Branch of State government. Under the direction of the County Administrator, the State legislative advocate will provide, at a minimum, the following services: 1. Energetically represent the County and serve as a liaison between the California State Legislature, the Governor, State administration officials, and other State Department representatives. 2. Maintain regular, routine communication with the County Administrator’s Office regarding issues of importance to the County Board of Supervisors, the County Administrator, and Department heads. 3. Provide the County Administrator’s Office with timely reports during session and on an "as needed" basis when the Legislature is not in session. 4. Work with the legislative members and staff to implement the legislative objectives approved by the County, including (if necessary) obtaining sponsorship of bill(s) or amendment(s) to bill(s) consistent with the legislative agenda and Platform approved by the County Board of Supervisors. 5. Assist the County in developing strong relations with the County’s legislative delegation, legislative leaders and the Administration. This includes developing a target list of key Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 8 of 15 influencers from both parties in the Legislature and proactively developing relationships between these members and County leaders. 6. Draft and/or assist in drafting materials, correspondence, legislation, amendments, and resolutions to advocate in support of the County’s legislative goals. 7. Monitor all bills of interest to the County and take action on such legislation as directed by the County Administrator’s Office. For bills or amendments passed into law that affect the County, Contractor shall monitor the implementation of those laws and advise the County on the action needed to ensure proper implementation and compliance. 8. Provide logistical support to arrange appointments and meetings with members of the Legislature, Administration, and State agencies, as needed. This includes preparing talking points and/or briefing materials as needed. 9. Serve as the liaison to the California State Association of Counties (CSAC), Urban Counties of California (UCC), and, as requested, to other state professional organizations. 10. Lead the County in developing and implementing an effective State advocacy strategy and annual legislative program to: a. Influence State laws and policies as they relate to County priorities, programs and operations, including enacting legislation which accomplish specific County goals; and b. Identify opportunities to increase funding for County priorities, programs and operations. The advocate will be proactive in opposing legislation or statutes that may have a negative impact on funding. 11. Research and provide information to the County on such matters as: a. State Budget: Prepare written reports of analysis of State Budget actions and their impact on the County. b. State bills and laws: Monitor legislation affecting County programs and alert the County Administrator’s Office and appropriate departmental staff. c. Funding opportunities and availability. d. Legislative hearings, reports and testimony. e. State regulations, guidelines, directives and other administrative policies, both proposed and adopted. f. Technical memoranda and reports impacting County operations; and g. Perform other related duties as mutually agreed upon. Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 9 of 15 F. DELIVERABLES/REPORTS 1. Report on and advise the County on relevant State legislation, proposed and adopted, and administrative actions that affect County programs. Reporting will include, at a minimum: a. a yearly summary on major activities and accomplishments; b. participation in monthly conference calls with the Legislation Committee to provide updates on legislative activities, pending legislation, and all budget related matters; and c. at least two (2) visits per year to the County which will include meetings with Board members/staff, County administrative and departmental staff. 2. Regular e-mails regarding budget and/or legislative updates. 3. Report of County sponsored, supported and opposed bills, to be included in the annual Legislative Platform. III. INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDERS G. CORRESPONDENCE As of the issuance of this RFQ, Responders are specifically directed not to contact County personnel for meetings, conferences or technical discussions related to this RFQ. Failure to adhere to this policy may result in disqualification of the Responder. All questions regarding the proposal must be directed to Lara DeLaney, Senior Deputy County Administrator at: lara.delaney@cao.cccounty.us. Include RFQ #1902-329 in the Subject line. The deadline for submitting questions for this RFQ is on or before 12:00 noon on April 3, 2019. All questions will be answered and disseminated to those registered on the BidSync website; BidSync is a web-based government bidding system. It is the responsibility of each responder to be familiar with all of the specifications, terms and conditions. By the submission of a Bid, the Responder certifies that if awarded a contract they will make no claim against the County based upon ignorance of conditions or misunderstanding of the specifications. H. CALENDAR OF EVENTS Event Date/Location Request Issued March 27, 2019 Written Questions Due by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on April 3, 2019 Response Due by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on April 24, 2019 Interviews Week of May 6, 2019 Legislation Committee Recommendation May 13, 2019 Board Award Date May 21, 2019 Contract Start Date July 1, 2019 Note: Award date is approximate. Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 10 of 15 I. SUBMITTAL OF RESPONSES 1. All responses must be SEALED and must be received at the County Administrator’s Office by 12:00 p.m. on the due date specified in the Calendar of Events. NOTE: LATE AND/OR UNSEALED REPONSES CANNOT BE ACCEPTED. IF HAND DELIVERING RESPONSE, PLEASE ALLOW TIME FOR METERED STREET PARKING OR PARKING IN PUBLIC PARKING LOTS. Responses will be received only at the address shown below, and by the time indicated in the Calendar of Events. Any response received after said time and/or date or at a place other than the stated address cannot be considered and will be returned to the responder unopened. 2. Responses are to be addressed and delivered as follows: State Legislative Advocacy Services RFQ #1902-329 Contra Costa County, County Administrator’s Office 651 Pine Street, 10th floor Martinez, CA 94553 3. Responders are to submit one (1) original hard copy response, with original blue ink signatures, plus five (5) copies of their proposal. Original response is to be clearly marked, printed on plain white paper, and must be either loose leaf or in a 3-ring binder (NOT bound). It is preferred that all responses submitted shall be printed double-sided and on minimum 30% post-consumer recycled content paper. 4. Responders must also submit an electronic copy of their proposal. The electronic copy must be a single file, scanned image of the original hard copy with all appropriate signatures, and must be on a disk or USB flash drive and enclosed with the sealed hard copy of the response. 5. Responder’s name and return address must also appear on the mailing package. 6. No email (electronic) or facsimile responses will be considered. 7. Responder agrees and acknowledges all RFQ specifications, terms and conditions and indicates ability to perform by submission of its response. 8. All costs required for the preparation and submission of a bid shall be borne by Responder. 9. Proprietary or Confidential Information: No part of any response is to be marked as confidential or proprietary. County may refuse to consider any response o r part thereof so marked. Responses submitted in response to this RFQ may be subject to public disclosure. County shall not be liable in any way for disclosure of any such records. Additionally, all responses shall become the property of County. County reserves the Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 11 of 15 right to make use of any information or ideas contained in submitted responses. This provision is not intended to require the disclosure of records that are exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250, et seq.) or of “trade secrets” protected by the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Civil Code Section 3426, et seq.). 10. All other information regarding the responses will be held as confidential until such time as the County Selection Committee has completed their evaluation and an intended award has been made by the County Board of Supervisors. The submitted proposals shall be made available upon request no later than five (5) business days after approval of the award and contract is scheduled to be heard by the Board of Supervisors. All parties submitting proposals, either qualified or unqualified, will receive mailed intent to award/non-award notifications, which will include the name of the responder to be recommended for award of this project. 11. Each response received, with the name of the responder, shall be entered on a record, and each record with the successful response indicated thereon shall, after the award of the order or contract, be open to public inspection. J. RESPONSE FORMAT 1. Responses are to be straightforward, clear, concise and specific to the information requested. 2. In order for responses to be considered complete, Responder must provide all information requested. See Exhibit B, Response Content and Submittals Completeness Checklist. K. EVALUATION CRITERIA/SELECTION COMMITTEE All proposals will be evaluated by a County Selection Committee (CSC). The County Selection Committee may be composed of Board Members, County staff and other parties that may have expertise or experience in State legislative advocacy services. The CSC will select a contractor in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in this RFQ. The evaluation of the proposals shall be within the sole judgment and discretion of the CSC. All contact during the evaluation phase shall be through the County Administrator’s Office only. Responders shall neither contact nor lobby evaluators during the evaluation process. Attempts by Responder to contact and/or influence members of the CSC may result in disqualification of Responder. As a result of this RFQ, the County intends to award a contract to the responsible responder whose response conforms to the RFQ and whose response presents the greatest value to the County, all evaluation criteria considered. The combined weight of the evaluation criteria is greater in importance than cost in determining the greatest value to the County. The goal is to award a contract to the responder that proposes to the County the best quality of services as determined by the combined weight of the evaluation criteria. Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 12 of 15 The evaluation process may include a two-stage approach including an initial evaluation of the written proposal and preliminary scoring to develop a short list of responders that will continue to the final stage of oral presentation and interview and reference checks. If the two stage approach is used, responders receiving the highest preliminary scores may be invited to an oral presentation and interview. Only the responders meeting the short list criteria will proceed to the next stage. All other responders will be deemed eliminated from the process. All responders will be notified of the short list participants; however, the preliminary scores at that time will not be communicated to responders. Evaluation Criteria • Completeness of Response • Relevant Experience and Relationships • References • Understanding of the Project and Scope of Work • Presentation and Interview if required L. NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD At the conclusion of the RFQ response evaluation process (“Evaluation Process”), all responders will be notified in writing by e-mail or fax, and certified mail, by the CAO’s office of the contract award recommendation, if any. The document providing this notification is the “Notice of Intent to Award.” The Notice of Intent to Award will provide the following information:  The name of the responder being recommended for contract award; and  The names of all other parties that submitted proposals. M. DISPUTES RELATING TO PROPOSAL PROCESS AND AWARD In the event a dispute arises concerning the proposal process prior to the award of the contract, the party wishing resolution of the dispute shall submit a request in writing to the County Administrator. Responders may appeal the recommended award or denial of award, provided the following stipulations are met: 1. Appeal must be in writing. 2. Must be submitted within five (5) calendar days of the date of the letter of notification of recommended award or denial of award. 3. An appeal of a denial of award can only be brought on the following grounds: a. Failure of the County to follow the selection procedures and adhere to requirements specified in the RFQ or any addenda or amendments. b. There has been a violation of conflict of interest as provided by California Government Code Section 87100 et seq. c. A violation of State or Federal law. Appeals will not be accepted for any other reasons than those stated above. All appeals must be sent to: Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 13 of 15 David Twa, County Administrator Contra Costa County 651 Pine Street, 10th floor Martinez CA, 94553 dtwa@cao.cccounty.us The County Administrator shall make a decision concerning the appeal and notify the Responder making the appeal within a reasonable timeframe prior to the tentatively scheduled date for awarding the contract. The decision of the County Administrator shall be deemed final. IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS N. TERM / RENEWAL 1. The term of the contract, which may be awarded pursuant to this RFQ, will be three (3) fiscal years, commencing July 1, 2019. 2. By mutual agreement, any contract which may be awarded pursuant to this RFQ may be extended for two (2) additional one year terms at agreed prices with all other terms and conditions remaining the same. O. PRICING 1. All pricing as quoted will remain firm for the term of any contract that may be awarded as a result of this RFQ. 2. Unless otherwise stated, Responder agrees that, in the event of a price decline, the benefit of such lower price shall be extended to the County. 3. Any price increases or decreases for subsequent contract terms may be negotiated between Contractor and County only after completion of the initial term. 4. All prices quoted shall be in United States dollars and "whole cent," no cent fractions shall be used. There are no exceptions. 5. Federal and State minimum wage laws apply. The County is not imposing any additional requirements regarding wages. 6. Prevailing Wages: Pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq., Contractor shall pay to persons performing labor in and about Work provided for in Contract not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the Work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for legal holiday and overtime work in said locality, which per diem wages shall not be less than the stipulated rates contained in a schedule thereof which has been ascertained and determined by the Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations to be the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft or type of workman or mechanic needed to execute this contract. Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 14 of 15 P. AWARD 1. Proposals will be evaluated by a committee and will be ranked in accordance with the RFQ section entitled “Evaluation Criteria/Selection Committee.” 2. The committee will recommend award to the responder who, in its opinion, has submitted the proposal that best serves the overall interests of the County and attains the highest overall score. An award may not necessarily be made to the responder with the lowest price. 3. The County reserves the right to reject any or all responses that materially differ from any terms contained in this RFQ or from any Exhibits attached hereto, to waive informalities and minor irregularities in responses received, and to provide an opportunity for responders to correct minor and immaterial errors contained in their submissions. The decision as to what constitutes a minor irregularity shall be made solely at the discretion of the County. 4. The County reserves the right to award to a single contractor. 5. The County has the right to decline to award this contract or any part thereof for any reason. 6. Board approval to award a contract is required. 7. Final Standard Contract terms and conditions will be negotiated with the selected responder. Q. METHOD OF ORDERING 1. A signed Standard Contract will be issued upon Board approval. 2. Standard Contracts will be transmitted electronically and mailed and shall be the only authorization for the Contractor to start the contract. 3. Payments for services will be issued only in the name of Contractor. 4. Contractor shall adapt to changes to the method of ordering procedures as required by the County during the term of the contract. 5. Change orders shall be agreed upon by Contractor and County and issued as needed in writing by County. R. INVOICING 1. Contractor shall invoice the County Administrator’s Office, unless otherwise advised, upon satisfactory performance of services. 2. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days following receipt of invoice and upon complete satisfactory performance of services. Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 15 of 15 3. County shall notify Contractor of any adjustments required to invoice. 4. Invoices shall contain County contract number, invoice number, and remit to address and itemized services description and price as quoted. 5. Contractor shall utilize standardized invoice upon request. 6. Invoices shall only be issued by the Contractor who is awarded a contract. 7. Payments will be issued to and invoices must be received from the same Contractor whose name is specified on the contract. S. ACCOUNT MANAGER/SUPPORT STAFF 1. Contractor shall provide a dedicated competent account manager who shall be responsible for the County account/contract. The account manager shall receive all contracts from the County and shall be the primary contact for all issues regarding Responder’s response to this RFQ and any contract which may arise pursuant to this RFQ. 2. Contractor shall also provide adequate, competent support staff that shall be able to service the County during normal working hours, Monday through Friday. Such representative(s) shall be knowledgeable about the contract, products offered and able to identify and resolve quickly any issues including but not limited to order and invoicing problems. 3. Contractor account manager shall be familiar with County requirements and standards and work with the CAO staff to ensure that established standards are adhered to. T. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Proper conduct is expected of Contractor’s personnel when on County premises. This includes adhering to no-smoking ordinances, the drug-free work place policy, not using alcoholic beverages and treating employees courteously. 2. The County has the right to request removal of any Contractor employee or subcontractor who does not properly conduct himself/herself/itself or perform quality work. Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT A COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA RFQ No. 1902-329 for STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Fees shall be submitted on Exhibit A as is. No alterations or changes of any kind are permitted. Responses that do not comply will be subject to rejection in total. The fees quoted below shall include all taxes and all other charges and is the cost the County will pay for the three-year term of any contract that is a result of this RFQ. Prices shall include everything necessary for the completion of and fulfillment of the contract including but not limited to furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, facilities and all management, labor, services, taxes, licenses, permits and an estimated cost for two (2) trips to Contra Costa County per year required to complete the work in accordance with the contract documents, except as may be provided otherwise in the contract documents. Responder agrees that the prices quoted are the maximum they will charge during the term of any contract awarded. 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year Description Unit of Measure No. Units Charge per Unit Extension Charge per unit Extension Charge per unit Extension Total for Three (3) Years A B C D = B *C E F = B*E G H = B*G I = (D + F + H) Monthly service charge for state legislative advocate program Per month 12 $$$$$$$ TOTAL COST FOR SERVICES FIRM: _________________________SIGNATURE:______________________DATE:___________ PRINTED NAME: __________________________________TITLE:__________________________ Exhibit B Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT B RFQ No. 1902-329 for STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES RESPONSE CONTENT AND SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST 1. Responses must be signed in blue ink and include evidence that the person or persons signing the proposal is/are authorized to execute the proposal on behalf of the responder. 2. Responders shall provide all of the below noted Response documentation and exhibits. Any material deviation from these requirements may be cause for rejection of the Response, as determined in the County’s sole discretion. The content and sequence for each required Response document/exhibit shall be as follows: CHECK LIST  A. Title Page: Show RFQ number and title, your company name and address, name of the contact person (for all matters regarding the RFQ response), telephone number and proposal date.  B. Table of Contents: Responses shall include a table of contents listing the individual sections of the proposal and their corresponding page numbers.  C. Cover Letter: Responses shall include a cover letter describing Responder and include all of the following: 1) The official name of Responder; 2) Responder’s organizational structure (e.g. corporation, partnership, limited liability company, etc.); 3) The jurisdiction in which Responder is organized and the date of such organization; 4) The address of Responder’s headquarters, any local office involved in the Response; and the address/location where the actual services will be performed; 5) Responder’s Federal Tax Identification Number; Exhibit B Page 2 of 3 6) The name, address, telephone, and e-mail address of the person(s) who will serve as the contact(s) to the County, with regards to the RFQ response, with authorization to make representations on behalf of and to bind Responder; 7) A representation that Responder is in good standing in the State of California and will have all necessary licenses, permits, certifications, approvals and authorizations necessary in order to perform all of its obligations in connection with this RFQ. This requirement includes the necessity for some out of state companies to be registered with the State of California by the effective date of the agreement. Information regarding this requirement can be located at the Secretary of State website, http://www.sos.ca.gov/; and 8) An acceptance of all conditions and requirements contained in this RFQ. 9) Cover letter must be signed in blue ink by a person or persons authorized to execute the proposal on behalf of the responder.  D. Responder’s Qualifications and Experience: Provide a description of Responder’s capabilities pertaining to this RFQ. This description should not exceed three (3) pages and should include a detailed summary of Responder’s experience relative to RFQ requirements described herein.  E. Key Personnel - Qualifications and Experience: Responses shall include a complete list of and resumes for all key personnel associated with the RFQ. This list must include all key personnel who will provide services to County staff and all key personnel who will provide maintenance and support services. For each person on the list, the following information shall be included: (1) the person’s relationship with Responder, including job title and years of employment with Responder; (2) the role that the person will play in connection with the RFQ (3) address, telephone and e- mail address; (4) the person’s educational background; (5) the person’s relevant experience; and (6) relevant awards, certificates or other achievements. This section of the bid response should include no more than two pages of information for each listed person.  F. Description of the Proposed Services: Response shall include a description of the services to be provided during the contract term including response times, not to exceed three (3) pages. The description must: (1) specify how the services in the response will meet or Exhibit B Page 3 of 3 exceed the requirements of the County; (2) explain any special resources, procedures or approaches that make the services of Responder particularly advantageous to the County; and (3) identify any limitations or restrictions of Responder in providing the services that the County should be aware of in evaluating its Response to this RFQ. Responses shall include a description of Responder’s approach in providing its services to the County, stating its understanding of the work to be done and a positive commitment to perform the work as specified.  G. References: 1) Responders are to provide a list of three (3) current and three (3) former clients. References must be satisfactory as deemed solely by County. References should have similar scope, volume and requirements to those outlined in these specifications, terms and conditions. Reference information is to include:  Company/Agency name  Contact person (name and title), contact person is to be someone directly involved with the services  Complete street address  Telephone number  Dates of service 2) The County may contact some or all of the references provided in order to determine Responder’s performance record on work similar to that described in this request. The County reserves the right to contact references other than those provided in the Response and to use the information gained from them in the evaluation process.  H. Relationships: Responders must provide a list of contacts and/or supporting documentation that demonstrates existing relationships with the County’s legislative delegation. The list need not be comprehensive. Responders must provide a list of contacts and/or supporting documentation that demonstrates existing relationships with other State legislators, legislative staff, State agencies, and executive branch officials. The list need not be comprehensive.  I. Fee Schedule, Exhibit A: Prices shall include the cost of everything necessary for fulfillment of the contract requirements.  J. Evidence of Insurance: Consultant may not commence work until it has furnished evidence of the insurance required in the Standard Contract to the CAO, and the CAO has approved it, and may not continue to perform any work under the contract if the insurance required therein is no longer in effect. Exhibit C Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT C RFQ No. 1902-329 for STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES STANDARD CONTRACT ALCALDE & FAY GOVERNMENT & PUBLIC A FFAIRS CONSULTANTS Attachment C A LCALDE & F AY PROPOSAL TO PERFORM FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES FOR CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA IN RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS NUMBER 1902-328 APRIL 19, 2019 PAUL SCHLESINGER, PARTNER ALCALDE & FAY 2111 WILSON BOULEVARD, 8TH FLOOR ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22201 PHONE: (703) 841-0626 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Letter Page 1 Responder’s Qualifications and Experience Page 2 Key Personnel – Qualifications and Experience Page 5 Description of the Proposed Services Page 9 References Page 12 Relationships Page 14 Fee Schedule, Exhibit A Page 16 Evidence of Insurance Page 17 COVER LETTER RESPONDER’S QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE Alcalde & Fay has been privileged to represent Contra Costa County since 2001. We have enjoyed a long and productive relationship, and together have addressed a significant number of challenges that have faced the County over the years. We value our relationship and the history that we have built together, and appreciate this opportunity to re-affirm our commitment to serve the County with vigor and enthusiasm for its issues, and with the dogged persistence required to achieve its objectives. Recognized as a bipartisan company, Alcalde & Fay’s partners and personnel are drawn from both political parties and have among them close working relationships with many key legislators and staff on both sides of the aisle in the Senate and the House, as well as in the ranks of political appointees and senior career staff in many of the federal agencies of greatest interest to public entities such as Contra Costa County. Our partners include a former Member of Congress, senior staff from Capitol Hill, and three Presidential appointees. Also included among the partners and associates are those with backgrounds in public relations, journalism, marketing, and the practice of law. Alcalde & Fay has built a reputation for effective public policy representation on behalf of numerous public entities ranging in size from the City of Treasure Island, Florida (population of about 7,000), to Miami-Dade County and the City of Dallas, as well as many corporations, coalitions, and trade associations. Of our 54 current clients, 44 are from the public sector and 10 are private entities. We work diligently on behalf of all these clients to help facilitate their priority programs and projects and assist on national issues in which they are interested, through federal authorizing and appropriations legislation, federal and foundation grants, and the administrative rulemaking process. We have also been able to assist clients by working with them to navigate the federal labyrinth and clear up bureaucratic obstacles and misunderstandings that have stood in the way of their objectives. Our range of expertise is broad and substantial – from environment and water resources to transportation and infrastructure projects, to those related to law enforcement and emergency services; health and social services; community and economic development; workforce development; and of course navigation, flood control and habitat restoration projects, among others. We have found this breadth of expertise to be a great benefit to all our clients, particularly in exploring funding opportunities outside their regular funding streams. In testimony of our abilities, Alcalde & Fay was named as one of the “Top 10 Most Influential Lobbying Firms” in the country in a recent report that reviewed over 3,500 Washington lobbying firms in existence as of September 2014. The report, “Factors of Influence™ Data-Driven Assessment of Lobbying Excellence,” was developed by the Graduate School of Political Management at George Washington University in partnership with Lobbyists.info, a division of Columbia Books, Inc. The Center for Public Integrity characterized Alcalde & Fay as one of “Washington’s biggest bats” in the transportation line-up, based on our expertise and experience. At Alcalde & Fay, we enjoy extensive experience in representing a range of California governmental entities. In addition to our long-term efforts on behalf of Contra Costa (18 years), we have, at various times, provided general representation to six other California counties. Our relationship with some of these clients spans over two decades. We have also served four cities, three transportation districts, three ports, two school districts, a water agency, and a community college located in California. As a result, we are steeped in California issues, engaged with most of the State’s Congressional delegation, and over the years have been able to work with clients to obtain over $1 billion in federal funding for a range of California projects. As a consequence of our extensive background representing local governments in California and around the country, including our ongoing representation of Contra Costa County, we have built a strong track record on a broad range of federal funding and policy issues, as we hope our work with the County these past 18 years has amply demonstrated. Our partners and associates have developed specialty areas of expertise, enabling the firm to address the full breadth of federal legislative programs on behalf of our clients. We are prepared to continue monitoring key issues affecting the County and informing your staff of significant legislative developments as they occur. To offer you some guidance as to the rate of return the County might expect from your investment in us, we reviewed the historical records of public clients served by Paul Schlesinger, who would continue to lead our Contra Costa client team. During his tenure at Alcalde & Fay, he has chaired 14 public client teams. His track record is strong. His clients have invested about $13.54 million in retainer payments to the firm and received nearly $1.95 billion in federal assistance. So, every dollar invested by Paul’s clients has resulted in an average return of $144 to the client. Of course, different clients may seek different types of federal assistance, and we might anticipate that some objectives are more likely to yield greater rates of return. Thus, while we can’t promise such a return for any one prospective client, we can document that this is the “historic” rate of return for public clients served by Alcalde & Fay teams headed by Paul. Clearly, with such an impressive track record, it can safely be said that Paul (whose background on Capitol Hill focused on public infrastructure including programs and projects related to water resources and transportation, the environment, and economic development) has developed a broad expertise in assisting pubic clients in meeting a range of needs that extends well beyond the public works domain. We simply would not be able to generate the rate of return stated above without having wide-ranging expertise and experience in virtually all areas of interest to local government agencies. We believe the team at Alcalde & Fay offers unparalleled experience in helping municipalities address critical and strategic issues, from infrastructure and environmental projects to community and social services and the full range of programs generally supported by a county. For over 45 years, Alcalde & Fay has successfully managed issues and represented a broad range of clients before the United States Congress and the executive branch. The firm has built a distinguished reputation of effective public policy representation on behalf of numerous municipal governments, as well as a myriad of corporations including those in the transportation, environmental, communications, health care, energy, and defense industries. At Alcalde & Fay, we are well aware of virtually all of the County’s interests and initiatives with regard to the federal government and, indeed, have helped develop and implement strategies being utilized to try and address these issues. Alcalde & Fay meets each of the qualifications outlined by Contra Costa in its RFQ. We have extensive experience in developing legislation related to your priorities, and indeed have 18 years of experience working on your behalf, as well as over 45 years of experience in representing public bodies before Congress. Our familiarity with the laws and regulations that govern environmental restoration, water supply, flood protection, wastewater treatment, and recycled water initiatives have enabled us to be effective in developing a track record of success on behalf of Contra Costa and other clients. We have been pleased to assist Contra Costa County in advancing several Army Corps projects over the years, and secured federal assistance that has helped the County meet its goals in several other areas of government, as well. We have also been the County’s interface in Washington on its single most important objective; protecting the Delta and opposing shifting proposals (popular throughout much of the State) to construct tunnels that would facilitate the movement of water from the Delta to other parts of the State. Over the years, we have helped the County secure more than $133 million in funding from the Army Corps for various maintenance dredging, channel deepening, flood control, and other projects. Among these is the clean-up of an abandoned mercury mine from a formerly moribund and obscure program at the Army Corps. Language secured in the Statement of Managers accompanying an Army Corps reauthorization bill called out this single project and instructed the Corps to give it priority consideration when allocating funds from the program. We then worked to secure funding for the project and ongoing appropriations so that monies will be in place when we’re ready to draw them down. With regard to the tunnels, we have helped coordinate the County’s efforts in Washington with those of the other Delta counties, working with their lobbyists and congressional delegations to protect against any federal funding or administrative shortcuts for the project, and to help assure that the various involved federal agencies are all understanding of the positions of Contra Costa and the other Delta counties. Other needs we have helped the County meet through federal assistance include funding for a county- wide police communications system, a youth literacy program, a library at a juvenile jail, a major highway, a bike trail, a program combatting methamphetamine use, assisting children exposed to domestic violence, and through a federal grant; funds for a reintegration and recidivism reduction program. This record could only have been achieved through working closely not just with our outstanding congressional delegation, but with senior committee members, including those of the Senate and House Appropriations Committees, and their staffs, as well. On two different occasions we were pleased to arrange visits to the County by the then-Chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, which has jurisdiction over funding for the Army Corps of Engineers, as well as a visit from the Chairman of the House Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure. In each case, these important congressional leaders toured our projects, learned first-hand of their importance, and went on to help assist us in meeting our needs. KEY PERSONNEL – QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE To ensure effective representation on behalf of Contra Costa, we will continue to employ a team approach. As with any good organization, our greatest strength, and your best assurance of our successful service on behalf of the County, resides in the team that we assembled to represent your interests in Washington. Client teams are comprised of individuals selected among the firm's partners and associates to complement each other's experience and expertise in various issue areas of significance to the particular entity. The objectives of Contra Costa County have been paired with the skills and experience of the firm's partners and associates to maximize the likelihood of success in implementing your federal legislative agenda. The County will have the assurance that the Team Leader and designated Primary Contact, Paul Schlesinger, will always provide timely and appropriate attention to the goals of the County for the duration of the contractual period. The Client Team will include: Paul Schlesinger, Kevin Fay, Anne Cullather, Perrin Badini and Dana Nottingham. At Alcalde & Fay, we are not so small that you are not adequately served during busy times or times of crisis. And we are not so large that we trot out senior partners to attract your business, who you then never see again. The Contra Costa client team will always know every aspect of your federal agenda. Each of the team members will devote as much time as required to achieve the County’s legislative goals and will be available on a 24-hour basis when necessary. Although different members of the client team may work with Paul on various projects, each of the team members will be knowledgeable about the County’s issues. Furthermore, every partner or associate in the firm will be available on an as-needed basis that may involve a particular Member of Congress or legislative issue. At Alcalde & Fay, the entire firm will continue to view itself as Contra Costa County’s Washington office, part of your staff, and every one of us will be available to be called upon to assist you as needed. The following are profiles of the County’s proposed client team. The profiles provide a description of each client team member’s qualifications, credentials and relevant experience, along with their role as part of the client team. Each of these individuals has substantial experience in representing public bodies. Each can be reached at our offices (2111 Wilson Boulevard, 8th Floor, Arlington, Virginia 22201) and via phone (703-841-0626) or fax (703-243-2874). The individual e-mail address for each team member is included with their profile, below. Paul Schlesinger, Partner Email: Schlesinger@alcalde-fay.com Paul Schlesinger is a specialist in transportation and public infrastructure issues and has over 25 years of experience representing numerous communities and special purpose districts around the country. Paul joined Alcalde & Fay in 1991, after serving Congress in a variety of high-profile positions. Before joining the firm, Paul served for four years on the staff of a senior House Member in the California delegation, followed by seven years on the staff of the House Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, and finally three years as Staff Director of the full House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, which has jurisdiction over programs and projects under the management of agencies including the Army Corps of Engineers, the Environmental Protection Agency (Clean Water Act and some aspects of the Clean Air Act), the Federal Aviation Administration, the General Services Administration, and others. He worked extensively on the drafting and implementation of three transportation reauthorization laws, two Army Corps reauthorization laws, the Americans with Disabilities Act, Clean Air Act Amendments, and various other public laws. This work engendered within Paul an interest and expertise in these issues which remain strong today. And the respect Paul gained throughout the public works policy-making arena during his years on the Hill remains unabated. At Alcalde & Fay, Paul chairs our public client division and counts among his clients eight public entities, most of which have infrastructure, water, and environmental issues with which we assist. Toward this end, he has had the opportunity to continue many long-term relationships on the Hill, at federal agencies, and among his colleagues in organizations around Washington, while working extensively on behalf of his public interest clientele. Paul is a graduate of the University of Maryland with a degree in Government and Politics, and continued his graduate studies there in Public Administration and Public Policy Analysis. He was initiated into the Phi Kappa Phi and Pi Sigma Alpha (for the study of political science) honor societies. Role: Mr. Schlesinger will continue to serve as Team Leader and will manage everyday client team operations. He will be the primary voice for the County on Capitol Hill and at the various Federal agencies. Kevin Fay, Vice Chairman and CEO Email: Fay@alcalde-fay.com Kevin J. Fay is an internationally recognized specialist on environmental and energy issues with particular emphasis on governmental policies involving the atmosphere and climate. Mr. Fay has twice been recognized by the Environmental Protection Agency for leadership in global environmental protection. He has also served in a management capacity for public affairs programs for major trade associations. Kevin joined the firm in 1982 and serves as its Vice Chairman and CEO. Kevin has a current and active interest in climate change issues and has been recognized as an authority within this complex and dynamic milieu. He was active in the legislative process that led to the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments and has served as an industry representative on U.S. delegations dealing with these issues at international negotiations. A trained media spokesperson, Mr. Fay has appeared on numerous television and radio shows, including ABC's "Nightline" and CNN's "Crossfire." Active in civic affairs, Mr. Fay has served on the Board of Visitors of the University of Virginia, the Board of the Fairfax County Park Authority, and on the Board of Governors of Bishop O’Connell High School in Arlington, Virginia. In recognition of his service to the community, Mr. Fay was honored as a recipient of the prestigious Lord Fairfax award. The Fairfax County Board of Supervisors presents this award each year for distinguished contributions to the community. He has also been honored as a recipient of the Catholic Schools Business Partnership award from the Catholic Business Network of Northern Virginia. He was named by the McLean Times and Providence Journal as its Citizen of the Year. He is a member of the Virginia State Bar. He received his J.D. from American University in Washington DC and is an honors graduate from the University of Virginia. Role: Mr. Fay will support all issues managed by the Team Leader on an as-needed basis. Anne Cullather, Partner Email: Cullather@alcalde-fay.com When Anne Cullather joined Alcalde & Fay in 2009, she brought with her 32 years of experience in business, public policy and advocacy. She currently supports the firm’s clients on a range of issues, including telecommunications, social services, water resources, energy, the environment and transportation. Anne also serves as Director of Grant Services for the firm, managing grant- seeking initiatives on behalf of our clients. Before joining the firm, Anne worked as an executive in the telecommunications industry, where she led state and federal government relations initiatives, working with Federal, state, and local legislative bodies and executive agencies. Prior to her career in telecommunications, Anne served as Director of Congressional Affairs for a nationwide trade association, focusing primarily on appropriations. She subsequently joined a lobbying firm where she represented colleges and universities. Anne started her government relations career on Capitol Hill, where she served as a legislative assistant for a senior Congressman from Connecticut. After spending her formative years in Virginia and Pennsylvania, she graduated from Dickinson College with a B.A. in Political Science. Role: Ms. Cullather will support all issues managed by the Team Leader, particularly those related to social services and telecommunications. She will also coordinate all grant services. Perrin Badini, Senior Associate Email: Badini@alcalde-fay.com Perrin Badini has more than a decade of experience working on behalf of many of Alcalde & Fay’s municipal, education, and private sector clients on a broad range of issues including transportation, water resources, economic development, public safety, and infrastructure. Mr. Badini has been effective in helping public clients secure millions of dollars in Federal funding for projects ranging from road improvements, flood damage mitigation and technology for law enforcement personnel to environmental initiatives, poverty reduction programs and city-wide “Green” programs. In his capacity working with some of our private sector clients, he has organized both large and small fundraising and charity events across the country. Prior to joining the firm in 2007, Mr. Badini worked for a prominent political media firm that specialized in research, planning and placement of political ads, including many for high profile federal candidates. During this time, Mr. Badini managed the coordination and distribution of campaign finances to media outlets across the country and worked closely with media buyers to ensure the proper placement of campaign ads was achieved. A native of New Orleans, Louisiana, Mr. Badini holds a bachelor’s degree in Political Science from Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge. Role: Mr. Badini will support all issues managed by the Team Leader, particularly those related to transportation and infrastructure. Dana Nottingham, Associate Email: Nottingham@alcalde-fay.com Dana Nottingham provides both legislative and research support to several of the firm’s public and private sector clients. In this capacity, Ms. Nottingham assists on a wide range of issue areas, utilizing her research skills, as well as drafting legislative updates and reports. Prior to joining the firm in 2018, Ms. Nottingham served as a legislative intern in the offices of Congressman Jared Polis of Colorado, and was a post-graduate intern with the McCain Institute for International Leadership. While at the McCain Institute, she focused on anti-trafficking research and action, a continuation of her work initiated while a student at Texas Christian University. There, she assisted on a Department of Justice-funded project collecting, classifying, and providing analysis on all federally prosecuted trafficking cases in the United States since 2000. Ms. Nottingham graduated from Texas Christian University with a bachelor’s degree in Political Science, and with a minor in Spanish, graduating Cum Laude. Role: Ms. Nottingham will conduct legislative research and provide administrative and logistical support for the Team. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED SERVICES Alcalde & Fay well understands the needs of the County and is prepared to perform the scope of work described in the RFQ, providing a full spectrum of federal governmental relations services. Alcalde & Fay meets each of the seven minimum qualifications outlined in the RFQ. We have been engaged for well over five years in providing Federal legislative advocacy to numerous local governments, including many county governments across the country and many public entities within California. As requested by the RFQ, we have elsewhere provided representative samples of our relationships with the County’s congressional delegation as well with other congressional staff and executive branch officials. To the best of our knowledge, Alcalde & Fay does not have any actual or potential conflicts of interest in providing the proposed services to Contra Costa County. It is important to note here that, as a firm representing the interests of many local government agencies, our mechanisms are in place to help monitor, and impact, issues that are of likely concern to you. Every partner and associate who works on behalf of similar clients gathers regularly to compare notes by discussing successes they have enjoyed that others might find helpful, sharing contacts on the Hill and in agencies who they have found to be particularly informative, and keeping one another apprised of bills and regulatory activities that might be of interest to all or many of our public clients. We are very familiar with the comprehensive requirements identified by the County, as they reflect the fundamental components of our lobbying business. Alcalde & Fay has the experience and expertise to address your requirements, interests, and needs. From strategy development and implementation, to access, advocacy and communication, we can continue our aggressive program on your behalf, helping to assure the County achieves its priority objectives and secures the funding you require. Our approach for providing the services requested by Contra Costa County includes: • Continuous communication with you and those in government we wish to influence; • Clear identification of objectives and funding requirements; • Disciplined analysis of appropriations and authorization bills; • Strategic and tactical use of your resources/personnel to amplify advocacy; • Development of strategy that fits into the agenda of Congress and the Executive Branch agencies. Developing & Implementing the County’s Legislative Program If chosen, our team would commit to manage your advocacy efforts – from assisting with the preparation of a federal legislative agenda based on the objectives you establish, to creating the advocacy materials and packages to present to legislators and the Executive branch, and then working throughout the year to assure your objectives are achieved. We would be your eyes, ears and voice in Washington – representing you before Congress and the Executive branch, guiding your issues and projects through the various processes, whether it is obtaining specific funding for a project, helping identify targeted grant opportunities, or providing a voice in the policy debate. Our approach to working with representatives of the County is based on the three “C”s – collaboration, communication, and cooperation. Development of an effective legislative agenda and supporting strategy is an iterative process – one that will require, at the front end of the process, substantial teamwork across organizations in order to clearly define priorities and gather the critical information required to create and implement an advocacy strategy. We are a high energy team, and we are not afraid to take on the workload to ensure you have an effective plan for accomplishing your goals, or to shift gears when priorities change or new opportunities surface. Having represented Contra Costa for 18 years, we have developed an institutional knowledge of your past achievements, and a good understanding of the concerns, priorities and challenges that confront you. Continued funding of your core interests is critical, sustaining and building on the successes of the past. Of course, the County’s interests will continue to be dynamic. It will be critical to continue with a robust legislative agenda that creatively melds your interests with the direction and priorities of a Congress that is also facing historic changes and challenges in financing all the competing demands on the budget. We are prepared to help Contra Costa implement that robust agenda – already begun - for 2019 and beyond. Communicating the County’s positions on critical priority issues to decision makers in Congress and the executive branch is part and parcel of our services. Once the federal agenda has been established, we routinely provide advice on and prepare or edit briefing documents, talking points, legislative correspondence and other advocacy materials that are essential to communicate your priority requirements. Armed with these, we will be ready, early in the calendar year, to introduce the agenda and associated materials to the offices of our Congressional delegation. Securing their understanding of, and support for, our priority initiatives is surely the first step of a successful year on the Hill. Alcalde & Fay regularly arranges visits to Washington for our clients to attend meetings with members of the congressional delegation; appropriations and authorization committee and subcommittee chairs, ranking members and/or senior staff; and executive branch officials. The firm is accustomed to facilitating all the arrangements of our clients’ visits, including scheduling and oftentimes transportation between meetings. Prior to any visit by County representatives, we would work cooperatively to prepare necessary documents that articulate your objectives and provide thorough briefings on the County’s federal priorities. Following the completion of the trip, we will also prepare memos to discuss action items resulting from your Washington trip. Of course, after a client has left town, we continue to work on its behalf throughout the legislative process; visiting/phoning/e-mailing often with the pertinent committee staff and encouraging your delegation offices to do the same. In addition to meetings with members of Congress and their staff, we have found that coordination with national organizations and issue-specific trade associations can often be useful in accomplishing broad national policy goals. Because we view ourselves as a part of your staff, we routinely attend meetings in Washington held by local government advocacy groups including the National Association of Counties (NACo), National Governor’s Association (NGA), National League of Cities (NLC), American Public Transportation Association, California State Association of Counties (CSAC), the California Governor’s Office, and the U.S. Conference of Mayors (USCM). Our established relationships with these coalitions and organizations allow us to routinely work with them in order to garner additional support for a client’s initiative, and regularly collaborate with their staffs on issues of broad importance to local governments. While we will try to enlist the support of such groups for Contra Costa’s priorities, it is worth noting that in recognition of our expertise and experience they also call on us from time-to-time for assistance with their efforts, to seek advice on how to best proceed on a matter, or to help them gain the support of – or access to – a specific Member or staffer. Alcalde & Fay is committed to helping Contra Costa follow the flow of federal dollars. With the shifting tides in Congress, there has been a growing emphasis on channeling funds through the competitive federal grants process. In working with you on your federal agenda, we will help identify which projects should target grant programs as a source of funding support. We offer customized prospecting services, grant writing and development services, as well as grant application peer review, evaluation and critique services. Of course, we work to develop Congressional support for grant applications and coordinate the inclusion of Congressional letters of support in the application package. Timely and Effective Communication At this point in our long and ongoing relationship, you understand that we will be in frequent contact with Contra Costa staff by telephone and e-mail. Additionally, we propose to keep you apprised of our advocacy efforts through a series of written status reports, appropriations and budget updates that typically include: an analysis of the Administration’s budget priorities for a given fiscal year; analysis of the Congressional Budget Resolution that is the spending blueprint for a given fiscal year; the status of the 12 Congressional Appropriations bills as they make their way through Congress; and a forecast of other federal priorities that could make the appropriations process deviate from the “standard.” The County will also continue to receive our This Week in Washington newsletter, which includes our Grant Alert for Local Governments, providing a compilation of pending federal grant solicitations. Alcalde & Fay uses a variety of tools and methods to manage the services we deliver to our clients, including utilization of databases to track and report on legislation and regulatory developments, identify grant opportunities, and alert clients to any issues or opportunities that could impact their mission. We review the Federal Register and other government publications daily to monitor the issuance of rules and regulations that could have implications for our clients, and we are on calls and in meetings with key staff in order to stay apprised of developments and progress on issues. As we monitor developments in the regulatory arena, we can routinely identify opportunities for you to submit comments on policy issues and rule changes that could impact your interests. We can assist in crafting such comments, as well as solicit political support from our Congressional delegation and Committee staff as appropriate. We will assist in drafting letters and other advocacy documents for Congress, the Executive Branch, the White House, OMB, and pertinent federal agencies, and coordinate meetings with Congressional and Executive branch officials to advance the priorities of Contra Costa. In addition to routine legislative memoranda, Alcalde & Fay will provide the County with an annual report detailing relevant Federal legislation and initiatives, as well as our efforts on behalf of the County. We are prepared to travel to the County to participate in meetings on an as needed basis, or participate via conference call as is usually the case during our involvement with certain Committee meetings. We are also equipped to participate in meetings via online video conferencing, if so desired. In addition to providing the services necessary to meet and exceed the County’s requirements, we will continue to address any unforeseen issues that may arise throughout the course of the year. This includes not only certain issues that you may identify as needing increased attention, but also those that we may bring to your attention as being of potential importance. In fact, we anticipate providing you with timely information and notices regarding new legislation, programs, or regulations that are introduced or proposed at the federal level. As always, we view your legislative agenda as a dynamic list of priorities that requires constant attention and potential reevaluation as time passes. REFERENCES Alcalde & Fay is pleased to provide the following references that can speak to the qualifications of our firm. For each of these three current and three former public clients, we provided a scope of work similar to those provided to the County and outlined in the RFQ. CURRENT CLIENTS City of Dallas, Texas Mr. Brett Wilkinson, Managing Director Office of Strategic Partnerships & Government Affairs 1500 Marilla, Room 4BN Dallas, Texas 75201 Phone: (214) 670-5047 Dates of service: January 2000 to present Golden Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District, California Dennis Mulligan, General Manager Box 9000, Presidio Station San Francisco, CA 94129-0601 Phone: (415) 923-2236 Dates of service: January 1995 to present City of Kenmore, Washington Nancy Ousley, Assistant City Manager 18120 68th Ave NE Kenmore, WA 98028 Phone: (425) 398-8900 Dates of service: January 2009 to present FORMER CLIENTS Transportation Agency for Monterey County, California Debbie Hale, Executive Director 55B Plaza Circle Salinas, CA 93901 Phone: (831) 775-4410 Dates of service: September 2002 to July 2014 City of Petaluma, California David Glass, Former Mayor (retired) 41 Oxford Court Petaluma, California 94952 Phone: (707) 762-4190 Dates of service: September 2001 to July 2012 City of San Rafael, California Richard Landis, Former Public Works Administrative Manager (retired) PO Box 4161, Novato, CA 94948 Phone: 415-827-4161 Dates of service: May 2007 to January 2012 RELATIONSHIPS The County’s Congressional delegation will continue to provide the base of support for implementing your federal legislative agenda. We have always worked well with these offices if only because we are representing their important constituent, Contra Costa County. But the Senate presents other challenges. California is, of course, a large state, and there are many competing demands on Senators and their key staff. In just one year, Senator Feinstein’s office received 10,000 nondefense-related appropriations requests from various communities around the State. By virtue of our long representation of your interests, and those of other California entities, we are able to cut through the clutter and the cluster of people demanding the attention of our Senate offices and assure our clients that their needs are, at a minimum, given a fair hearing by the right people. It is our objective in working with our Senate offices, to make sure that they are not just simply aware of the County’s concerns, but that they are on the “top of the stack”. This is an under-estimated but crucial objective that can only be achieved by a firm that has an ongoing relationship with the offices. To advance the County’s objectives, it is important that your Washington representative not only develop a rapport with your Congressional Delegation, but that they have solid working relationships with key chairmen, ranking members, and senior staff of the various pertinent Committees and Subcommittees of Congress. For Contra Costa County, our firm can offer both; we have a long-established working relationship with the California delegation and, for over three decades, have worked with key leadership and senior staff of many of the congressional committees. Working with key committee leaders and their staffs is among our strengths. This is enabled by virtue of our mix of public and private sector clients. Our private sector clientele provides us with the ability to participate in many fundraising events held throughout the City, and often in our offices where we host monthly breakfasts with a variety of Senators and Congressmen from around the country. And through our work on behalf of public clients throughout the nation, we have come to work closely with their Members of the House and Senate, some of whom enjoy leadership positions of potential interest to the County. For example, work for a Texas client has led to a close relationship with the Chair of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee. We represent a community in the district of the Ranking Republican of the Transportation, HUD and Related Agencies Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee, and the Ranking Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies, who is also the Ranking Democrat on the full Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. Our work for a city in Washington has allowed us to develop a strong working relationship with the Ranking Democrat of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation, and given our representation of several clients in the district of the Chairman of the Water, Oceans, and Wildlife Subcommittee, his is an office we work closely with. These Members know us and trust us. They have trusted us to team with them on projects and issues that they care about in their districts. So when we visit them on your behalf, they and their staffs know us as somebody they have worked with - and enjoyed successes with - and not as just another supplicant asking for favors. In fact, with a long history of service to public and private sector clients, and a sizeable current clientele and staff, it is fair to say that there are few Members of general importance to public sector clients who we do not know. If there is a Member or staffer important to a Contra Costa issue with whom your client team does not have ready access, there is an excellent likelihood that someone else at our firm does know that individual. And, as previously stated, everybody at the firm is available to serve the County on an as-needed basis, and is available to help make the necessary introductions. Drawing on the size and experience of the Alcalde & Fay staff, and our common interest in local government representation, someone among us generally knows key political and senior career staff in the agencies of importance to city and county governments. We are accustomed to working with such individuals at agencies including the Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Education, Energy, Health & Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Justice, Transportation and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Army Corps of Engineers, among others. As required by the RFQ, we have included below a representative sample of our contacts that clearly demonstrates our relationship with the County’s congressional delegation as well with other congressional staff and executive branch officials.  Office of Senator Dianne Feinstein • Josh Esquivel, Legislative Director • Trevor Higgins, Legislative Assistant  Office of Senator Kamala Harris • Ike Irby, Legislative Assistant  Office of Congressman Mike Thompson • Jennifer Goedke, Deputy Chief of Staff and Legislative Director • Crozer Connor, Legislative Assistant  Office of Congressman Mark DeSaulnier • Andrew Perlstein, Legislative Assistant  House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee • Kathy Dedrick, Staff Director  House Highway and Transit Subcommittee • David Napoliello, Senior Policy Advisor  House Water Resources and the Environment Subcommittee • Ryan Seiger, Staff Director/Senior Counsel  Office of Speaker Nancy Pelosi • Robert Edmonson, Chief of Staff  Army Corps of Engineers • Bradd Schwichtenberg, Civil Deputy, Southern Pacific District, Regional Integrated Team  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Office of Congressional & Intergovernmental Relations • Arnita Hannon Christmon, Intergovernmental Liaison  Economic Development Administration • Barrett Haga, Ph.D, Senior Administrator for Economic Engagement FEE SCHEDULE, EXHIBIT A As required by the RFQ, we have included a completed Bid Form (Exhibit A) within this section. For the full scope of services described in the proposal by the offered client team, we propose continuing our current contract terms. From the total amount of $104,296 per year, we will continue to bill a flat monthly amount of $8,458. We will bill additionally for out-of-pocket expenses accrued in any month for services such as telephone tolls, copying, messenger service, parking, and transportation; the total for which would not exceed an average of $100/month. Also built into the total is the cost of two annual trips to the County each year, which we do not believe would exceed $1,600. Proposed Total Cost for Services (including travel): $104,296 per year Proposed Monthly Retainer: $8,458 per month Estimated Additional Monthly Costs: $100 per month Estimated Travel Costs: $1,600 per year Acknowledging the difficult budgetary times faced by so many municipal entities, we recognize that there may be some need to revisit this fee suggestion, and should such a need arise, we would be pleased to enter into such discussions with you. EVIDENCE OF INSURANCE See below 7/2/2018 13270280 181853 Contra Costa County Office of the County Adminstrator Attn: David Twa 651 Pine Street, 10th Floor Martinez, CA 94533-0000 2111 Wilson Boulevard., 8th Floor Arlington, VA 22201 Alcalde & Fay Ltd. Travelers Indemnity Company Travelers Indemnity Co of America Executive Risk Indemnity 25658 25666 35181 601 13th St NW Washington, DC 20005 Commercial Lines USI Insurance Services National, Inc. Stephanie Johnson 202-424-2735 stephanie.johnson@usi.com 1,000,000 2,000,000 X 1,000,0007/01/2018 7/01/2019 300,000 A 5,000 X 680-90K6675A-18-42 2,000,000XX X B X X X X Comp $500 X Coll $1,000 BA-96K77711-18-SEL 7/01/2018 7/01/2019 1,000,000 3,000,000 X 7/01/2018 7/01/2019A 3,000,000XCUP-4132Y96A-18-42 5,000 X 1,000,000 1,000,000 A UB-4J677291-18-42 1,000,000 7/01/2018 7/01/2019 X N C C Professional Liability (E&O) Professional Liability (E&O) 7/01/20187/01/2018 7/01/2018 7/01/2019 7/01/2019 6803-2197 6803-2197 $1,000,000 Limit $25,000 Deductible Contra Costa County, it's officers and employees are Additional Insured under the General Liability, per written agreement, as their interest may appear. Subject to policy terms and conditions. 2111 WILSON BOULEVARD, 8TH FLOOR ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22201 PH (703) 841-0626 • FAX (703) 243-2874 www.alcalde-fay.com COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS No. 1902-328 For FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES Written questions about this RFQ can be submitted by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on April 10, 2019 to: lara.delaney@cao.cccounty.us Thank you in advance for your interest in this opportunity and for your efforts in preparing your response. DATE ISSUED: APRIL 1, 2019 RESPONSE DUE by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on APRIL 24, 2019 At Contra Costa County Administrator’s Office 651 Pine Street, 10th Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Attachment D COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS No. 1902-328 For FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 of 2 Page I. ACRONYM AND TERM GLOSSARY ....................................................................................... 4 II. STATEMENT OF WORK A. Intent ...................................................................................................................................... 4 B. Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 4 C. Background ........................................................................................................................... 6 D. Minimum Qualifications ........................................................................................................ 6 E. Specific Requirements/Scope of Work ................................................................................ 7 F. Deliverables/Reports .............................................................................................................. 9 III. INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDERS G. Correspondence...................................................................................................................... 9 H. Calendar of Events ................................................................................................................. 9 I. Submittal of Responses ........................................................................................................ 10 J. Response Format .................................................................................................................. 11 K. Evaluation Criteria/Selection Committee ............................................................................ 11 L. Notice of Intent to Award .................................................................................................... 12 M. Disputes Relating to Proposal Process and Award ............................................................. 12 IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS N. Term / Renewal .................................................................................................................... 13 O. Pricing .................................................................................................................................. 13 P. Award ................................................................................................................................... 14 Q. Method of Ordering ............................................................................................................. 14 R. Invoicing .............................................................................................................................. 15 S. Account Manager/Support Staff .......................................................................................... 15 T. General Requirements ......................................................................................................... 15 Attachment D COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS No. 1902-328 For FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A – Fee Schedule Exhibit B – Response Content and Submittal Completeness Checklist Exhibit C – Standard Contract Attachment D Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Page 4 of 15 I. ACRONYM AND TERM GLOSSARY Unless otherwise noted, the terms below may be upper or lower case. Acronyms will always be uppercase. Bidder or Responder Shall mean the specific person or entity responding to this RFQ Board Shall refer to the County of Contra Costa Board of Supervisors CAO Shall refer to the County Administrator’s Office CSC Shall refer to County Selection Committee Contractor When capitalized, shall refer to selected responder that is awarded a contract County When capitalized, shall refer to the County of Contra Costa Federal Refers to United States Federal Government, its departments and/or agencies FY Shall mean Fiscal Year Labor Code Refers to California Labor Code Proposal Shall mean responder/contractor response to this RFQ Request for Qualifications Shall mean this document, which is the County of Contra Costa’s request for contractors’/responders’ proposal to provide the services being solicited herein; also referred herein as RFQ Response or Submittal Shall refer to responder’s proposal submitted in reply to RFQ RFQ Request for Qualifications State Refers to State of California, its departments and/or agencies II. STATEMENT OF WORK A. INTENT The intent of this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is to describe federal legislative advocacy and related services required by the County of Contra Costa and to solicit qualifications from experienced providers to professionally and effectively represent the County’s interests in Washington D.C. The County intends to award a three-year contract with two (2) single year options to renew to the successful responder whose response conforms to the RFQ and meets the County’s requirements. B. SCOPE Contra Costa County is seeking qualifications from experienced providers of Federal legislative advocacy services to professionally and effectively represent the County’s interests in Washington, D.C. The purpose of the Federal legislative program is to secure legislation that benefits the County and its residents while seeking to mitigate or oppose legislation that would adversely impact the County’s delivery of service; to secure Federal funding through the grant and/or appropriations process; and to shape public policy in priority areas that impact County government. The successful responder will work in a proactive manner to protect and advance the County’s interests. This includes lobbying the Congress and Administration to ameliorate budget proposals that negatively affect the County’s interests and aggressively seek opportunities to Attachment D Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Page 5 of 15 enhance the County’s budget. Services required by the County include congressional and administrative representation with members of the executive branch, members and staff of the Congress, pertinent Federal offices and agencies, and relevant interest groups, coalitions, and associations. The successful Contractor will meet with Federal authorities and represent the County’s interests as directed by the County. The legislative advocate will also work with the Board of Supervisors, the Legislation Committee, the County Administrator, department heads and/or assigned departmental staff on a legislative agenda to advance the County’s interest s. This includes tracking and suggesting opportunities to change Federal policy in ways that will benefit residents of Contra Costa County. The Contractor shall report to the County Administrator’s Office. The CAO coordinates the County’s Legislative activities, as summarized below. 1. Annual Legislative Program The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopts an annual Federal Legislative Platform in January of each year1. Prior to developing this Platform, the CAO’s office invites input from all County departments, the Board of Supervisors, its subcommittees, and its advisory bodies. From this input, the Federal Legislative Platform is developed. The County’s Federal Legislative Platform includes identified funding needs, transportation needs, support for appropriations and grants, as well as the County’s position on various policy issues. The Platform is submitted to the Board of Supervisors through the County’s Legislation Committee, which typically approves the draft legislative Platform in December. The Platform is amended throughout the year as new legislative issues arise. 2. Legislation Committee In 2007, the County established the Legislation Committee as a means of coordinating the review of legislative matters of interest to the County. (The Board’s Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee reviews legislative matters related to transportation, water, and other infrastructure.) The Legislation Committee meets monthly to review the impact of State and Federal legislation on the County. The Committee receives regular updates from the County’s State and Federal legislative advocates and advises the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator on legislative matters affecting the County. 3. Issues of Particular Concern to the County A. Increased funding for health and human services programs B. Healthcare Reform; Medical Insurance for the Uninsured and Underinsured; Increased funding for Medicaid and Medicare C. Transportation & Infrastructure Funding D. Increased funding for Housing and Urban Development (HUD) programs, including Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), McKinney-Vento, Homeless Assistance, Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA), and HOME Investment Partnership programs 1 The Board’s adopted Platform is available at: http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/2859/Legislation Attachment D Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Page 6 of 15 E. Increased funding for navigation, flood control, and habitat restoration projects F. Funding for Mt. Diablo Mercury Mine Clean-up G. Federal grant funding for Justice-related programs H. Advocacy related to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, consistent with the County’s Water Platform Note that this list is not all-inclusive and the contractor would be expected to work with the County to identify other issues of concern. C. BACKGROUND Contra Costa County was incorporated in 1850 as one of the original 27 counties of California. A five-member Board of Supervisors, each elected to four-year terms in district nonpartisan elections, serves as the legislative body of the County, which has a general law form of government. Also elected are the County Assessor, Auditor-Controller, Clerk-Recorder, District Attorney, Sheriff-Coroner and Treasurer-Tax Collector. The County Administrator, David Twa, is appointed by the Board as the chief executive officer and directs the day-to-day government operations of the County. The County Administrator is also responsible for presenting the Board with a Recommended Budget for consideration of adoption as the Final (Adopted) Budget, which serves as the foundation of the County’s financial planning and control. Contra Costa is one of nine counties in the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Area and the ninth most populous county in California with an estimated population of 1,149,363 as of January 1, 2018. The County covers about 733 square miles and extends from the northeastern shore of the San Francisco Bay easterly about 50 miles to San Joaquin County. The County is bordered on the south and west by Alameda County and on the north by the Suisun and San Pablo Bays. The western and northern shorelines are highly industrialized, while the interior sections are suburban/residential, commercial and light industrial. The County contains 19 cities, the most populous of which include Richmond in the west (pop. 110,967); Antioch in the northeast (113,061); and Concord in the middle (129,159). The County agencies/departments include: Agriculture, Animal Services, Assessor, Auditor- Controller, Child Support Services, Clerk-Recorder, Conservation & Development, County Administrator, County Counsel, District Attorney, Employment and Human Services, Contra Costa Consolidated Fire, Health Services, Human Resources, Information Technology, Library, Probation, Public Defender, Public Works, Risk Management, Sheriff-Coroner, Treasurer-Tax Collector, and Veterans Services. The County employs approximately 9,801 permanent full-time employees. The General Fund budget for FY 2018-19 is $1.77 Billion, with a total adjusted budget, excluding Fire and special districts, for FY 2018-19 of $3.77 Billion. With respect to its Federal advocacy services, the County presently contracts with Alcalde &Fay. This firm has been under contract since 2001 as the County’s Federal legislative advocates and receives a monthly retainer of $8,458. The contract expires on June 30, 2019. D. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS 1. Responders shall be regularly and have been continuously engaged in the business of providing Federal legislative advocacy to local governments for at least five (5) years Attachment D Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Page 7 of 15 (does not have to be consecutive service or with the same jurisdiction), preferably to urban county governments. 2. Responders shall have an office based in the Washington D.C. area with at least two non- clerical staff who would be assigned full-time or part-time to this contract who possess significant experience testifying at hearings before Congress and Federal agencies. Responders must submit names and resumes. 3. Responders shall have relationships with the County’s congressional delegation and their staff. Responders must provide a list of contacts and/or supporting documentation that demonstrates existing relationships. The list need not be comprehensive. 4. Responders shall have broad bipartisan relationships with Federal representatives, congressional staff, Federal agency staff, and executive branch officials. Responders must provide a list of contacts or supporting documentation that demonstrates existing relationships. The list need not be comprehensive. 5. Responders shall possess the proven ability to initiate, develop, and carry out effective strategies to influence legislative and administrative activities and to effectively lobby on behalf of the County. 6. Responders shall possess all permits, licenses and professional credentials necessary to perform the required advocacy services. 7. Responders’ other clients should not pose conflict of interest issues for the County, nor should their interest be in direct conflict with the County’s mission. Any response that does not demonstrate that the Responder meets these minimum requirements by the deadline to submit proposals will be considered non-responsive and will not be eligible for evaluation for award of the contract. E. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/SCOPE OF WORK The selected Responder shall advise, counsel, and represent the County in pursuing initiatives and funding before the Congress and the Executive Branch of Federal government. Under the direction of the County Administrator, the Federal legislative advocate will provide, at a minimum, the following services: 1. Energetically represent the County and serve as a liaison between the Congress, Federal administration officials, and other Federal Department representatives. 2. Maintain regular, routine communication with the County Administrator’s Office regarding issues of importance to the County Board of Supervisors, the County Administrator, and Department heads. 3. Provide the County Administrator’s Office with timely reports during session and on an "as needed" basis when the Congress is not in session. Attachment D Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Page 8 of 15 4. Work with the legislative members and staff to implement the legislative objectives approved by the County, including (if necessary) obtaining sponsorship of bill(s) or amendment(s) to bill(s) consistent with the legislative agenda and Platform approved by the County Board of Supervisors. 5. Assist the County in developing strong relations with the County’s congressional delegation, congressional leaders and the Administration. This includes developing a target list of key influencers from both parties in the Congress and proactively developing relationships between these members and County leaders. 6. Draft and/or assist in drafting materials, correspondence, legislation, amendments, and resolutions to advocate in support of the County’s legislative goals. 7. Monitor all bills of interest to the County and take action on such legislation as directed by the County Administrator’s Office. For bills or amendments passed into law that affect the County, Contractor shall monitor the implementation of those laws and advise the County on the action needed to ensure proper implementation and compliance. 8. Provide logistical support to arrange appointments and meetings with members of the Congress, Administration, and Federal agencies, as needed. This includes preparing talking points and/or briefing materials as needed. 9. Serve as the liaison to the National Association of Counties (NACo), and, as requested, to other Federal professional organizations. 10. Lead the County in developing and implementing an effective Federal advocacy strategy and annual legislative program to: a. Influence Federal laws and policies as they relate to County priorities, programs and operations, including enacting legislation which accomplish specific County goals; and b. Identify opportunities to increase funding for County priorities, programs and operations. The advocate will be proactive in opposing legislation or statutes that may have a negative impact on funding. 11. Research and provide information to the County on such matters as: a. Federal Budget: Prepare written reports of analysis of Federal Budget actions and their impact on the County. b. Federal bills and laws: Monitor legislation affecting County programs and alert the County Administrator’s Office and appropriate departmental staff. c. Funding opportunities and availability. d. Congressional hearings, reports and testimony. Attachment D Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Page 9 of 15 e. Federal regulations, guidelines, directives and other administrative policies, both proposed and adopted. f. Technical memoranda and reports impacting County operations; and 12. Perform other related duties as mutually agreed upon. F. DELIVERABLES/REPORTS 1. Report on and advise the County on relevant Federal legislation, proposed and adopted, and administrative actions that affect County programs. Reporting will include, at a minimum: a. a yearly summary on major activities and accomplishments; b. participation in conference calls with the Legislation Committee to provide updates on legislative activities, pending legislation, and all budget related matters; and c. in-person visits to the County which will include meetings with Board members/staff, County administrative and departmental staff. 2. Regular e-mails regarding budget and/or legislative updates. III. INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDERS G. CORRESPONDENCE As of the issuance of this RFQ, Responders are specifically directed not to contact County personnel for meetings, conferences or technical discussions related to this RFQ. Failure to adhere to this policy may result in disqualification of the Responder. All questions regarding the proposal must be directed to Lara DeLaney, Senior Deputy County Administrator at: lara.delaney@cao.cccounty.us. Include RFQ #1902-328 in the Subject line. The deadline for submitting questions for this RFQ is on or before 12:00 noon on April 10, 2019. All questions will be answered and disseminated to those registered on the BidSync website; BidSync is a web-based government bidding system. It is the responsibility of each responder to be familiar with all of the specifications, terms and conditions. By the submission of a Bid, the Responder certifies that if awarded a contract they will make no claim against the County based upon ignorance of conditions or misunderstanding of the specifications. H. CALENDAR OF EVENTS Event Date/Location Request Issued April 1, 2019 Written Questions Due by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on April 10, 2019 Response Due by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on April 24, 2019 Interviews Week of May 6, 2019 Attachment D Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Page 10 of 15 Legislation Committee Recommendation May 13, 2019 Board Award Date May 21, 2019 Contract Start Date July 1, 2019 Note: Award date is approximate. I. SUBMITTAL OF RESPONSES 1. All responses must be SEALED and must be received at the County Administrator’s Office by 12:00 p.m. on the due date specified in the Calendar of Events. NOTE: LATE AND/OR UNSEALED RESPONSES CANNOT BE ACCEPTED. IF HAND DELIVERING RESPONSE, PLEASE ALLOW TIME FOR METERED STREET PARKING OR PARKING IN PUBLIC PARKING LOTS. Responses will be received only at the address shown below, and by the time indicated in the Calendar of Events. Any response received after said time and/or date or at a place other than the stated address cannot be considered and will be returned to the responder unopened. 2. Responses are to be addressed and delivered as follows: Federal Legislative Advocacy Services RFQ #1902-328 Contra Costa County, County Administrator’s Office 651 Pine Street, 10th floor Martinez, CA 94553 3. Responders are to submit one (1) original hard copy response, with original blue ink signatures, plus five (5) copies of their proposal. Original response is to be clearly marked, printed on plain white paper, and must be either loose leaf or in a 3-ring binder (NOT bound). It is preferred that all responses submitted shall be printed double-sided and on minimum 30% post-consumer recycled content paper. 4. Responders must also submit an electronic copy of their proposal. The electronic copy must be a single file, scanned image of the original hard copy with all appropriate signatures, and must be on a disk or USB flash drive and enclosed with the sealed hard copy of the response. 5. Responder’s name and return address must also appear on the mailing package. 6. No email (electronic) or facsimile responses will be considered. 7. Responder agrees and acknowledges all RFQ specifications, terms and conditions and indicates ability to perform by submission of its response. Attachment D Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Page 11 of 15 8. All costs required for the preparation and submission of a bid shall be borne by Responder. 9. Proprietary or Confidential Information: No part of any response is to be marked as confidential or proprietary. County may refuse to consider any response o r part thereof so marked. Responses submitted in response to this RFQ may be subject to public disclosure. County shall not be liable in any way for disclosure of any such records. Additionally, all responses shall become the property of County. County reserves the right to make use of any information or ideas contained in submitted responses. This provision is not intended to require the disclosure of records that are exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250, et seq.) or of “trade secrets” protected by the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Civil Code Section 3426, et seq.). 10. All other information regarding the responses will be held as confidential until such time as the County Selection Committee has completed their evaluation and an intended award has been made by the County Board of Supervisors. The submitted proposals shall be made available upon request no later than five (5) business days after approval of the award and contract is scheduled to be heard by the Board of Supervisors. All parties submitting proposals, either qualified or unqualified, will receive mailed intent to award/non-award notifications, which will include the name of the responder to be recommended for award of this project. 11. Each response received, with the name of the responder, shall be entered on a record, and each record with the successful response indicated thereon shall, after the award of the order or contract, be open to public inspection. J. RESPONSE FORMAT 1. Responses are to be straightforward, clear, concise and specific to the information requested. 2. In order for responses to be considered complete, Responder must provide all information requested. See Exhibit B, Response Content and Submittal Completeness Checklist. K. EVALUATION CRITERIA/SELECTION COMMITTEE All proposals will be evaluated by a County Selection Committee (CSC). The County Selection Committee may be composed of Board Members, County staff and other parties that may have expertise or experience in Federal legislative advocacy services. The CSC will select a contractor in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in this RFQ. The evaluation of the proposals shall be within the sole judgment and discretion of the CSC. All contact during the evaluation phase shall be through the County Administrator’s Office only. Responders shall neither contact nor lobby evaluators during the evaluation process. Attempts by Responder to contact and/or influence members of the CSC may result in disqualification of Responder. Attachment D Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Page 12 of 15 As a result of this RFQ, the County intends to award a contract to the responsible responder whose response conforms to the RFQ and whose response presents the greatest value to the County, all evaluation criteria considered. The combined weight of the evaluation criteria is greater in importance than cost in determining the greatest value to the County. The goal is to award a contract to the responder that proposes to the County the best quality of services as determined by the combined weight of the evaluation criteria. The evaluation process may include a two-stage approach including an initial evaluation of the written proposal and preliminary scoring to develop a short list of responders that will continue to the final stage of oral presentation and interview and reference checks. If the two-stage approach is used, responders receiving the highest preliminary scores may be invited to an oral presentation and interview. Only the responders meeting the short list criteria will proceed to the next stage. All other responders will be deemed eliminated from the process. All responders will be notified of the short list participants; however, the preliminary scores at that time will not be communicated to responders. Evaluation Criteria • Completeness of Response • Relevant Experience and Relationships • References • Understanding of the Project and Scope of Work • Presentation and Interview if required L. NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD At the conclusion of the RFQ response evaluation process (“Evaluation Process”), all responders will be notified in writing by e-mail or fax, and certified mail, by the CAO’s office of the contract award recommendation, if any. The document providing this notification is the “Notice of Intent to Award.” The Notice of Intent to Award will provide the following information:  The name of the responder being recommended for contract award; and  The names of all other parties that submitted proposals. M. DISPUTES RELATING TO PROPOSAL PROCESS AND AWARD In the event a dispute arises concerning the proposal process prior to the award of the contract, the party wishing resolution of the dispute shall submit a request in writing to the County Administrator. Responders may appeal the recommended award or denial of award, provided the following stipulations are met: 1. Appeal must be in writing. 2. Must be submitted within five (5) calendar days of the date of the letter of notification of recommended award or denial of award. 3. An appeal of a denial of award can only be brought on the following grounds: a. Failure of the County to follow the selection procedures and adhere to requirements specified in the RFQ or any addenda or amendments. Attachment D Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Page 13 of 15 b. There has been a violation of conflict of interest as provided by California Government Code Section 87100 et seq. c. A violation of State or Federal law. Appeals will not be accepted for any other reasons than those stated above. All appeals must be sent to: David Twa, County Administrator Contra Costa County 651 Pine Street, 10th floor Martinez CA, 94553 dtwa@cao.cccounty.us The County Administrator shall make a decision concerning the appeal and notify the Responder making the appeal within a reasonable timeframe prior to the tentatively scheduled date for awarding the contract. The decision of the County Administrator shall be deemed final. IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS N. TERM / RENEWAL 1. The term of the contract, which may be awarded pursuant to this RFQ, will be three (3) fiscal years, commencing July 1, 2019. 2. By mutual agreement, any contract which may be awarded pursuant to this RFQ may be extended for two (2) additional one year terms at agreed prices with all other terms and conditions remaining the same. O. PRICING 1. All pricing as quoted will remain firm for the term of any contract that may be awarded as a result of this RFQ. 2. Unless otherwise stated, Responder agrees that, in the event of a price decline, the benefit of such lower price shall be extended to the County. 3. Any price increases or decreases for subsequent contract terms may be negotiated between Contractor and County only after completion of the initial term. 4. All prices quoted shall be in United States dollars and "whole cent," no cent fractions shall be used. There are no exceptions. 5. Federal and State minimum wage laws apply. The County is not imposing any additional requirements regarding wages. 6. Prevailing Wages: Pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq., Contractor shall pay to persons performing labor in and about Work provided for in Contract not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in Attachment D Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Page 14 of 15 which the Work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for legal holiday and overtime work in said locality, which per diem wages shall not be less than the stipulated rates contained in a schedule thereof which has been ascertained and determined by the Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations to be the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft or type of workman or mechanic needed to execute this contract. P. AWARD 1. Proposals will be evaluated by a committee and will be ranked in accordance with the RFQ section entitled “Evaluation Criteria/Selection Committee.” 2. The committee will recommend award to the responder who, in its opinion, has submitted the proposal that best serves the overall interests of the County and attains the highest overall score. An award may not necessarily be made to the responder with the lowest price. 3. The County reserves the right to reject any or all responses that materially differ from any terms contained in this RFQ or from any Exhibits attached hereto, to waive informalities and minor irregularities in responses received, and to provide an opportunity for responders to correct minor and immaterial errors contained in their submissions. The decision as to what constitutes a minor irregularity shall be made solely at the discretion of the County. 4. The County reserves the right to award to a single contractor. 5. The County has the right to decline to award this contract or any part thereof for any reason. 6. Board approval to award a contract is required. 7. Final Standard Contract terms and conditions will be negotiated with the selected responder. Q. METHOD OF ORDERING 1. A signed Standard Contract will be issued upon Board approval. 2. Standard Contracts will be transmitted electronically and mailed and shall be the only authorization for the Contractor to start the contract. 3. Payments for services will be issued only in the name of Contractor. 4. Contractor shall adapt to changes to the method of ordering procedures as required by the County during the term of the contract. 5. Change orders shall be agreed upon by Contractor and County and issued as needed in writing by County. Attachment D Specifications, Terms & Conditions for Federal Legislative Advocacy Services Page 15 of 15 R. INVOICING 1. Contractor shall invoice the County Administrator’s Office, unless otherwise advised, upon satisfactory performance of services. 2. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days following receipt of invoice and upon complete satisfactory performance of services. 3. County shall notify Contractor of any adjustments required to invoice. 4. Invoices shall contain County contract number, invoice number, and remit to address and itemized services description and price as quoted. 5. Contractor shall utilize standardized invoice upon request. Invoices shall only be issued by the Contractor who is awarded a contract. 6. Payments will be issued to and invoices must be received from the same Contractor whose name is specified on the contract. S. ACCOUNT MANAGER/SUPPORT STAFF 1. Contractor shall provide a dedicated competent account manager who shall be responsible for the County account/contract. The account manager shall receive all contracts from the County and shall be the primary contact for all issues regarding Responder’s response to this RFQ and any contract which may arise pursuant to this RFQ. 2. Contractor shall also provide adequate, competent support staff that shall be able to service the County during normal working hours, Monday through Friday. Such representative(s) shall be knowledgeable about the contract, products offered and able to identify and resolve quickly any issues including but not limited to order and invoicing problems. 3. Contractor account manager shall be familiar with County requirements and standards and work with the CAO staff to ensure that established standards are adhered to. T. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Proper conduct is expected of Contractor’s personnel when on County premises. This includes adhering to no-smoking ordinances, the drug-free work place policy, not using alcoholic beverages and treating employees courteously. 2. The County has the right to request removal of any Contractor employee or subcontractor who does not properly conduct himself/herself/itself or perform quality work. Attachment D Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT A COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA RFQ No. 1902-328 for FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Fees shall be submitted on Exhibit A as is. No alterations or changes of any kind are permitted. Responses that do not comply will be subject to rejection in total. The fees quoted below shall include all taxes and all other charges and is the cost the County will pay for the three-year term of any contract that is a result of this RFQ. Prices shall include everything necessary for the completion of and fulfillment of the contract including but not limited to furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, facilities and all management, labor, services, taxes, licenses, permits and an estimated cost for two (2) trips to Contra Costa County per year required to complete the work in accordance with the contract documents, except as may be provided otherwise in the contract documents. Responder agrees that the prices quoted are the maximum they will charge during the term of any contract awarded. 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year Description Unit of Measure No. Units Charge per Unit Extension Charge per unit Extension Charge per unit Extension Total for Three (3) Years A B C D = B *C E F = B*E G H = B*G I = (D + F + H) Monthly service charge for advocacy program Per month 12 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL COST FOR SERVICES FIRM: _________________________SIGNATURE:______________________DATE:___________ PRINTED NAME: __________________________________TITLE:__________________________ Attachment D Exhibit B Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT B RFQ No. 1902-328 for FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES RESPONSE CONTENT AND SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST 1. Responses must be signed in blue ink and include evidence that the person or persons signing the proposal is/are authorized to execute the proposal on behalf of the responder. 2. Responders shall provide all of the below noted Response documentation and exhibits. Any material deviation from these requirements may be cause for rejection of the Response, as determined in the County’s sole discretion. The content and sequence for each required Response document/exhibit shall be as follows: CHECK LIST  A. Title Page: Show RFQ number and title, your company name and address, name of the contact person (for all matters regarding the RFQ response), telephone number and proposal date.  B. Table of Contents: Responses shall include a table of contents listing the individual sections of the proposal and their corresponding page numbers.  C. Cover Letter: Responses shall include a cover letter describing Responder and include all of the following: 1) The official name of Responder; 2) Responder’s organizational structure (e.g. corporation, partnership, limited liability company, etc.); 3) The jurisdiction in which Responder is organized and the date of such organization; 4) The address of Responder’s headquarters, any local office involved in the Response; and the address/location where the actual services will be performed; 5) Responder’s Federal Tax Identification Number; Attachment D Exhibit B Page 2 of 3 6) The name, address, telephone, and e-mail address of the person(s) who will serve as the contact(s) to the County, with regards to the RFQ response, with authorization to make representations on behalf of and to bind Responder; 7) A representation that Responder is in good standing in the State of Virginia and Washington D.C. and will have all necessary licenses, permits, certifications, approvals and authorizations necessary in order to perform all of its obligations in connection with this RFQ; and 8) An acceptance of all conditions and requirements contained in this RFQ. 9) Cover letter must be signed in blue ink by a person or persons authorized to execute the proposal on behalf of the responder.  D. Responder’s Qualifications and Experience: Provide a description of Responder’s capabilities pertaining to this RFQ. This description should not exceed three (3) pages and should include a detailed summary of Responder’s experience relative to RFQ requirements described herein.  E. Key Personnel - Qualifications and Experience: Responses shall include a complete list of and resumes for all key personnel associated with the RFQ. This list must include all key personnel who will provide services to County staff and all key personnel who will provide maintenance and support services. For each person on the list, the following information shall be included: (1) the person’s relationship with Responder, including job title and years of employment with Responder; (2) the role that the person will play in connection with the RFQ (3) address, telephone and e-mail address; (4) the person’s educational background; (5) the person’s relevant experience; and (6) relevant awards, certificates or other achievements. This section of the bid response should include no more than two pages of information for each listed person.  F. Description of the Proposed Services: Response shall include a description of the services to be provided during the contract term including response times, not to exceed three (3) pages. The description must: (1) specify how the services in the response will meet or exceed the requirements of the County; (2) explain any special resources, procedures or approaches that make the services of Responder particularly Attachment D Exhibit B Page 3 of 3 advantageous to the County; and (3) identify any limitations or restrictions of Responder in providing the services that the County should be aware of in evaluating its Response to this RFQ. Responses shall include a description of Responder’s approach in providing its services to the County, stating its understanding of the work to be done and a positive commitment to perform the work as specified.  G. References: 1) Responders are to provide a list of three (3) current and three (3) former clients. References must be satisfactory as deemed solely by County. References should have similar scope, volume and requirements to those outlined in these specifications, terms and conditions. Reference information is to include:  Company/Agency name  Contact person (name and title), contact person is to be someone directly involved with the services  Complete street address  Telephone number  Dates of service 2) The County may contact some or all of the references provided in order to determine Responder’s performance record on work similar to that described in this request. The County reserves the right to contact references other than those provided in the Response and to use the information gained from them in the evaluation process.  H. Relationships: Responders must provide a list of contacts and/or supporting documentation that demonstrates existing relationships with the County’s congressional delegation. The list need not be comprehensive. Responders must provide a list of contacts and/or supporting documentation that demonstrates existing bipartisan relationships with other Federal representatives, congressional staff, Federal agencies, and executive branch officials. The list need not be comprehensive.  I. Fee Schedule, Exhibit A: Prices shall include the cost of everything necessary for fulfillment of the contract requirements.  J. Evidence of Insurance: Consultant may not commence work until it has furnished evidence of the insurance required in the Standard Contract to the CAO, and the CAO has approved it, and may not continue to perform any work under the contract if the insurance required therein is no longer in effect. Attachment D Exhibit C Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT C RFQ No. 1902-328 for FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES STANDARD CONTRACT Attachment D Form L-1 (Page 1 of 2) Contra Costa County STANDARD CONTRACT Number: Standard Form L-1 (Purchase of Services – Long Form) Fund/Org: Revised 2014 Account: Other: 1. Contract Identification. Department: County Administrator’s Office Subject: 2. Parties. The County of Contra Costa, California (County), for its Department named above, and the following named Contractor mutually agree and promise as follows: Contractor: Capacity: Address: 3. Term. The effective date of this Contract is . It terminates on unless sooner terminated as provided herein. 4. Payment Limit. County’s total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $ . 5. County’s Obligations. County shall make to the Contractor those payments described in the Payment Provisions attached hereto which are incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 6. Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor shall provide those services and carry out that work described in the Service Plan attached hereto which is incorporated herein by reference, subject to all the terms and conditions contained or incorporated herein. 7. General and Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions and Special Conditions (if any) attached hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. 8. Project. This Contract implements in whole or in part the following described Project, the application and approval documents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Attachment D Form L-1 (Page 2 of 2) Contra Costa County STANDARD CONTRACT Number: Standard Form L-1 (Purchase of Services – Long Form) Fund/Org: Revised 2014 Account: Other: 9. Legal Authority. This Contract is entered into under and subject to the following legal authorities: Government Code Section 31000; Penal Code Sections 1228-1233.8 10. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties’ agreement hereto: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS By: ___________________________________________ Chair/Designee ATTEST: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: ___________________________________________ Deputy CONTRACTOR Signature A Name of business entity: By: ___________________________________________ (Signature of individual or officer) ___________________________________________ (Print name and title A, if applicable) Signature B Name of business entity: By: ___________________________________________ (Signature of individual or officer) ___________________________________________ (Print name and title B, if applicable. Note to Contractor: For corporations (profit or nonprofit) and limited liability companies, the contract must be signed by two officers. Signature A must be that of the chairman of the board, president, or vice-president; and Signature B must be that of the secretary, any assistant secretary, chief financial officer or any assistant treasurer (Civil Code Section 1190 and Corporations Code Section 313). All signatures must be acknowledged as set forth on Form L-2. Attachment D Form L-2 (Page 1 of 1) Contra Costa County ACKNOWLEDGMENT/APPROVALS Number: Standard Form L-2 (Purchase of Services – Long Form) Revised 2014.2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) On _____________________________ (Date), before me, (Name and Title of the Officer), personally appeared, , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. Signature of Notary Public Place Seal Above ACKNOWLEDGMENT (by Corporation, Partnership, or Individual) (Civil Code §1189) APPROVALS RECOMMENDED BY DEPARTMENT FORM APPROVED BY COUNTY COUNSEL By: _____________________________ By: _____________________________ Designee Deputy County Counsel APPROVED: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR By: _____________________________ Designee A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. Attachment D Initials: Contractor County Dept. Form L-3 (Page 1 of 1) Contra Costa County SERVICE PLAN OUTLINE Number Standard Form L-3 (Purchase of Services - Long Form) Revised 2008 SERVICE PLAN [This is where you set forth a detailed description of the services to be provided by the contractor. It is NOT acceptable to merely cut and paste the contractor’s response to a Request For Proposals (RFP).] Attachment D Initials: Contractor County Dept. Form P-1 (Page 1 of 1) Contra Costa County PAYMENT PROVISIONS Number Standard Form P-1 (Fee Basis Contracts - Long and Short Form) Revised 2008 1. Payment Amounts. Subject to the Payment Limit of this Contract and subject to the following Payment Provisions, County will pay Contractor the following fee as full compensation for all services, work, expenses or costs provided or incurred by Contractor: [Check one alternative only.] a. $ monthly, or b. $ per unit, as defined in the Service Plan, or c. $ after completion of all obligations and conditions herein. d. Other: . 2. Payment Demands. Contractor shall submit written demands for payment on County Demand Form D-15 in the manner and form prescribed by County. Contractor shall submit said demands for payment no later than 30 days from the end of the month in which the contract services upon which such demand is based were actually rendered. Upon approval of payment demands by the head of the County Department for which this Contract is made, or his designee, County will make payments as specified in Paragraph 1. (Payment Amounts) above. 3. Penalty for Late Submission. If County is unable to obtain reimbursement from the State of California as a result of Contractor’s failure to submit to County a timely demand for payment as specified in Paragraph 2. (Payment Demands) above, County shall not pay Contractor for such services to the extent County's recovery of funding is prejudiced by the delay even though such services were fully provided. 4. Right to Withhold. County has the right to withhold payment to Contractor when, in the opinion of County expressed in writing to Contractor, (a) Contractor's performance, in whole or in part, either has not been carried out or is insufficiently documented, (b) Contractor has neglected, failed or refused to furnish information or to cooperate with any inspection, review or audit of its program, work or records, or (c) Contractor has failed to sufficiently itemize or document its demand(s) for payment. 5. Audit Exceptions. Contractor agrees to accept responsibility for receiving, replying to, and/or complying with any audit exceptions by appropriate county, state or federal audit agencies resulting from its performance of this Contract. Within 30 days of demand, Contractor shall pay County the full amount of County's obligation, if any, to the state and/or federal government resulting from any audit exceptions, to the extent such are attributable to Contractor's failure to perform properly any of its obligations under this Contract. Attachment D Contra Costa County GENERAL CONDITIONS Standard Form L-5 (Purchase of Services - Long Form) Revised 2016 Contractor County Dept. Form L-5 (Page 1 of 7) 1. Compliance with Law. Contractor is subject to and must comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations with respect to its performance under this Contract, including but not limited to, licensing, employment, and purchasing practices; and wages, hours, and conditions of employment, including nondiscrimination. 2. Inspection. Contractor's performance, place of business, and records pertaining to this Contract are subject to monitoring, inspection, review and audit by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. 3. Records. Contractor must keep and make available for inspection and copying by authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government, the Contractor's regular business records and such additional records pertaining to this Contract as may be required by the County. a. Retention of Records. Contractor must retain all documents pertaining to this Contract for five years from the date of submission of Contractor's final payment demand or final Cost Report; for any further period that is required by law; and until all federal/state audits are complete and exceptions resolved for this Contract's funding period. Upon request, Contractor must make these records available to authorized representatives of the County, the State of California, and the United States Government. b. Access to Books and Records of Contractor, Subcontractor. Pursuant to Section 1861(v)(1) of the Social Security Act, and any regulations promulgated thereunder, Contractor must, upon written request and until the expiration of five years after the furnishing of services pursuant to this Contract, make available to the County, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, or the Comptroller General, or any of their duly authorized representatives, this Contract and books, documents, and records of Contractor necessary to certify the nature and extent of all costs and charges hereunder. Further, if Contractor carries out any of the duties of this Contract through a subcontract with a value or cost of $10,000 or more over a twelve-month period, such subcontract must contain a clause to the effect that upon written request and until the expiration of five years after the furnishing of services pursuant to such subcontract, the subcontractor must make available to the County, the Secretary, the Comptroller General, or any of their duly authorized representatives, the subcontract and books, documents, and records of th e subcontractor necessary to verify the nature and extent of all costs and charges thereunder. This provision is in addition to any and all other terms regarding the maintenance or retention of records under this Contract and is binding on the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. 4. Reporting Requirements. Pursuant to Government Code Section 7550, Contractor must include in all documents and written reports completed and submitted to County in accordance with this Contract, a separate section listing the numbers and dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of each such document or written report. This section applies only if the Payment Limit of this Contract exceeds $5,000. Attachment D Contra Costa County GENERAL CONDITIONS Standard Form L-5 (Purchase of Services - Long Form) Revised 2016 Contractor County Dept. Form L-5 (Page 2 of 7) 5. Termination and Cancellation. a. Written Notice. This Contract may be terminated by either party, in its sole discretion, upon thirty-day advance written notice thereof to the other, and may be cancelled immediately by written mutual consent. b. Failure to Perform. County, upon written notice to Contractor, may immediately terminate this Contract should Contractor fail to perform properly any of its obligations hereunder. In the event of such termination, County may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses. The cost to County of completing Contractor's performance will be deducted from any sum due Contractor under this Contract, without prejudice to County's rights to recover damages. c. Cessation of Funding. Notwithstanding any contrary language in Paragraphs 5 and 11, in the event that federal, state, or other non-County funding for this Contract ceases, this Contract is terminated without notice. 6. Entire Agreement. This Contract contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the parties. Except as expressly provided herein, no other understanding, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Contract will be deemed to exist or to bind any of the parties hereto. 7. Further Specifications for Operating Procedures. Detailed specifications of operating procedures and budgets required by this Contract, including but not limited to, monitoring, evaluating, auditing, billing, or regulatory changes, may be clarified in a written letter signed by Contractor and the department head, or designee, of the county department on whose behalf this Contract is made. No written clarification prepared pursuant to this Section will operate as an amendment to, or be considered to be a part of, this Contract. 8. Modifications and Amendments. a. General Amendments. In the event that the total Payment Limit of this Contract is less than $100,000 and this Contract was executed by the County’s Purchasing Agent, this Contract may be modified or amended by a written document executed by Contractor and the County’s Purchasing Agent or the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, subject to any required state or federal approval. In the event that the total Payment Limit of this Contract exceeds $100,000 or this Contract was initially approved by the Board of Supervisors , this Contract may be modified or amended only by a written document executed by Contractor and the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors or, after Board approval, by its designee, subject to any required state or federal approval. b. Minor Amendments. The Payment Provisions and the Service Plan may be amended by a written administrative amendment executed by Contractor and the County Administrator (or designee), subject to any required state or federal approval, provided that such administrative amendment may not increase the Payment Limit of this Contract or reduce the services Contractor is obligated to provide pursuant to this Contract. 9. Disputes. Disagreements between County and Contractor concerning the meaning, requirements, or performance of this Contract shall be subject to final written determination by the head of the county department for which this Contract is made, or his designee, or in accordance with the applicable procedures (if any) required by the state or federal government. Attachment D Contra Costa County GENERAL CONDITIONS Standard Form L-5 (Purchase of Services - Long Form) Revised 2016 Contractor County Dept. Form L-5 (Page 3 of 7) 10. Choice of Law and Personal Jurisdiction. a. This Contract is made in Contra Costa County and is governed by, and must be construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. b. Any action relating to this Contract must be instituted and prosecuted in the courts of Contra Costa County, State of California. 11. Conformance with Federal and State Regulations and Laws. Should federal or state regulations or laws touching upon the subject of this Contract be adopted or revised during the term hereof, this Contract will be deemed amended to assure conformance with such federal or state requirements. 12. No Waiver by County. Subject to Paragraph 9. (Disputes) of these General Conditions, inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of County indicating Contractor's performance or any part thereof complies with the requirements of this Contract, or acceptance of the whole or any part of said performance, or payments therefor, or any combination of these acts, do not relieve Contractor's obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor is the County thereby prevented from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions of this Contract. 13. Subcontract and Assignment. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. Prior written consent of the County Administrator or his designee, subject to any required state or federal approval, is required before the Contractor may enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under this Contract, or before the Contractor may assign this Contract or monies due or to become due, by operation of law or otherwise. 14. Independent Contractor Status. The parties intend that Contractor, in performing the services specified herein, is acting as an independent contractor and that Contractor will control the work and the manner in which it is performed. This Contract is not to be construed to create the relationship between the parties , or between County and any Contractor employee, of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association. Neither Contractor, nor any of its employees, is a County employee. This Contract does not give Contractor, or any of its employees, any right to participate in any pension plan, workers’ compensation plan, insurance, bonus, or similar benefits County provides to its employees. In the event that County exercises its right to terminate this Contract, Contractor expressly agrees that it will have no recourse or right of appeal under any rules, regulations, ordinances, or laws applicable to employees. 15. Conflicts of Interest. Contractor covenants that it presently has no interest and that it will not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, that represents a financial conflict of interest under state law or that would otherwise conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its services hereunder. Contractor further covenants that in the performance of this Contract, no person having any such interests will be employed by Contractor. If requested to do so by County, Contractor will complete a “Statement of Economic Interest” form and file it with County and will require any other person doing work under this Contract to complete a “Statement of Economic Interest” form and file it with County. Contractor covenants that Contractor, its employees and officials, are not now employed by Cou nty and have not been so employed by County within twelve months immediately preceding this Contract; or, if so employed, did not then and do not now occupy a position that would create a conflict of interest under Government Code section 1090. In Attachment D Contra Costa County GENERAL CONDITIONS Standard Form L-5 (Purchase of Services - Long Form) Revised 2016 Contractor County Dept. Form L-5 (Page 4 of 7) addition to any indemnity provided by Contractor in this Contract, Contractor will indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmless from any and all claims, investigations, liabilities, or damages resulting from or related to any and all alleged conflicts of interest. Contractor warrants that it has not provided, attempted to provide, or offered to provide any money, gift, gratuity, thing of value, or compensation of any kind to obtain this Contract. 16. Confidentiality. To the extent allowed under the California Public Records Act, Contractor agrees to comply and to require its officers, partners, associates, agents and employees to comply with all applicable state or federal statutes or regulations respecting confidentiality, including but not limited to, the identity of persons served under this Contract, their records, or services provided them, and assures that no person will publish or disclose or permit or cause to be published or disclosed, any list of persons receiving services, except as may be required in the administration of such service. Contractor agrees to inform all employees, agents and partners of the above provisions, and that any person knowingly and intentionally disclosing such information other than as authorized by law may be guilty of a misdemeanor. 17. Nondiscriminatory Services. Contractor agrees that all goods and services under this Contract will be available to all qualified persons regardless of age, gender, race, religion, color, national origin, ethnic background, disability, or sexual orientation, and that none will be used, in whole or in part, for religious worship. 18. Indemnification. Contractor will defend, indemnify, save, and hold harmless County and its officers and employees from any and all claims, demands, losses, costs, expenses, and liabilities for any damages, fines, sickness, death, or injury to person(s) or property, including any and all administrative fines, penalties or costs imposed as a result of an administrative or quasi-judicial proceeding, arising directly or indirectly from or connected with the services provided hereunder that are caused, or claimed or alleged to be caused, in whole or in part, by the negligence or willful misconduct of Contractor, its officers, employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors, or any persons under its direction or control. If requested by County, Contractor will defend any such suits at its sole cost and expense. If County elects to provide its own defense, Contractor will reimburse County for any expenditures, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. Contractor’s obligations under this section exist regardless of concurrent negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the County or any other person; provided, however, that Contractor is not required to indemnify County for the proportion of liability a court determines is attributable to the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the County, its officers and employees. This provision will survive the expiration or termination of this Contract. 19. Insurance. During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, Contractor shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the following insurance requirements unless otherwise expressed in the Special Conditions: a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. For all contracts where the total payment limit of the contract is $500,000 or less, Contractor will provide commercial general liability insurance, including coverage for business losses and for owned and non-owned automobiles, with a minimum combined single limit coverage of $500,000 for all damages, including consequential damages, due to bodily injury, sickness or disease, or death to any person or damage to or destruction of property, including the loss of use thereof, arising from each occurrence. Such insurance must be endorsed to include County and its officers and employees as additional insureds as to all services performed by Contractor under this Contract. Said policies must constitute primary insurance as to County, the state and federal governments, and their officers, agents, and employees, so that other insurance policies held by Attachment D Contra Costa County GENERAL CONDITIONS Standard Form L-5 (Purchase of Services - Long Form) Revised 2016 Contractor County Dept. Form L-5 (Page 5 of 7) them or their self-insurance program(s) will not be required to contribute to any loss covered under Contractor’s insurance policy or policies. Contractor must provide County with a copy of the endorsement making the County an additional insured on all commercial general liability policies as required herein no later than the effective date of this Contract. For all contracts where the total payment limit is greater than $500,000, the aforementioned insurance coverage to be provided by Contractor must have a minimum combined single limit coverage of $1,000,000. b. Workers' Compensation. Contractor must provide workers' compensation insurance coverage for its employees. c. Certificate of Insurance. The Contractor must provide County with (a) certificate(s) of insurance evidencing liability and worker's compensation insurance as required herein no later than the effective date of this Contract. If Contractor should renew the insurance policy(ies) or acquire either a new insurance policy(ies) or amend the coverage afforded through an endorsement to the policy at any time during the term of this Contract, then Contractor must provide (a) current certificate(s) of insurance. d. Additional Insurance Provisions. No later than five days after Contractor’s receipt of: (i) a notice of cancellation, a notice of an intention to cancel, or a notice of a lapse in any of Contractor’s insurance coverage required by this Contract; or (ii) a notice of a material change to Contractor’s insurance coverage required by this Contract, Contractor will provide Department a copy of such notice of cancellation, notice of intention to cancel, notice of lapse of coverage, or notice of material change. Contractor’s failure to provide Department the notice as required by the preceding sentence is a default under this Contract 20. Notices. All notices provided for by this Contract must be in writing and may be delivered by deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid. Notices to County must be addressed to the head of the county department for which this Contract is made. Notices to Contractor must be addressed to the Contractor's address designated herein. The effective date of notice is the date of deposit in the mails or of other delivery, except that the effective date of notice to County is the date of receipt by the head of the county department for which this Contract is made. 21. Primacy of General Conditions. In the event of a conflict between the General Conditions and the Special Conditions, the General Conditions govern unless the Special Conditions or Service Plan expressly provide otherwise. 22. Nonrenewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation, implication, or understanding that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased by County under a new contract following expiration or termination of this Contract, and Contractor waives all rights or claims to notice or hearing respecting any failure to continue purchasing all or any such services from Contractor. 23. Possessory Interest. If this Contract results in Contractor having possession of, claim or right to the possession of land or improvements, but does not vest ownership of the land or improvements in the same person, or if this Contract results in the placement of taxable improvements on tax exempt land (Revenue & Taxation Code Section 107), such interest or improvements may represent a possessory interest subject to property tax, and Contractor may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest. Contractor agrees that this provision complies with the notice requirements of Revenue & Taxation Code Section 107.6, and waives all rights to further notice or to damages under that or any comparable statute. Attachment D Contra Costa County GENERAL CONDITIONS Standard Form L-5 (Purchase of Services - Long Form) Revised 2016 Contractor County Dept. Form L-5 (Page 6 of 7) 24. No Third-Party Beneficiaries. Nothing in this Contract may be construed to create, and the parties do not intend to create, any rights in third parties. 25. Copyrights, Rights in Data, and Works Made for Hire. Contractor will not publish or transfer any materials produced or resulting from activities supported by this Contract without the express written consent of the County Administrator. All reports, original drawings, graphics, plans, studies and other data and documents, in whatever form or format, assembled or prepared by Contactor or Contractor’s subcontractors, consultants, and other agents in connection with this Contract are “works made for hire” (as defined in the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. Section 101 et seq., as amended) for County, and Contractor unconditionally and irrevocably transfers and assigns to Agency all right, title, and interest, including all copyrights and other intellectual property rights, in or to the works made for hire. Unless required by law, Contractor shall not publish, transfer, discuss, or disclose any of the above-described works made for hire or any information gathered, discovered, or generated in any way through this Agreement, without County’s prior express written consent. If any of the works made for hire is subject to copyright protection, County reserves the right to copyright such works and Contractor agrees not to copyright such works. If any works made for hire are copyrighted, County reserves a royalty-free, irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, and use the works made for hire, in whole or in part, without restriction or limitation, and to authorize others to do so. 26. Endorsements. In its capacity as a contractor with Contra Costa County, Contractor will not publicly endorse or oppose the use of any particular brand name or commercial product without the prior written approval of the Board of Supervisors. In its County-contractor capacity, Contractor will not publicly attribute qualities or lack of qualities to a particular brand name or commercial product in the absence of a well-established and widely accepted scientific basis for such claims or without the prior written approval of the Board of Supe rvisors. In its County-contractor capacity, Contractor will not participate or appear in any commercially produced advertisements designed to promote a particular brand name or commercial product, even if Contractor is not publicly endorsing a product, as long as the Contractor's presence in the advertisement can reasonably be interpreted as an endorsement of the product by or on behalf of Contra Costa County. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Contractor may express its views on products to other contractors , the Board of Supervisors, County officers, or others who may be authorized by the Board of Supervisors or by law to receive such views. 27. Required Audit. a. If Contractor expends $750,000 or more in federal grant funds in any fiscal year from any source, Contractor must provide to County, at Contractor's expense, an audit conforming to the requirements set forth in the most current version of Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Part 200, Subpart F. b. If Contractor expends less than $750,000 in federal grant funds in any fiscal year from any source, but the grant imposes specific audit requirements, Contractor must provide County with an audit conforming to those requirements. c. If Contractor expends less than $750,000 in federal grant funds in any fiscal year from any source, Contractor is exempt from federal audit requirements for that year except as required by Code of Federal Regulations, Title 2, Part 200, Subpart F. Contractor shall make its records available for, and an audit may be required by, appropriate officials of the federal awarding agency, the General Accounting Office , the pass-through entity and/or the County. If an audit is required, Contractor must provide County with the audit. Attachment D Contra Costa County GENERAL CONDITIONS Standard Form L-5 (Purchase of Services - Long Form) Revised 2016 Contractor County Dept. Form L-5 (Page 7 of 7) d. With respect to the audits specified in sections (a), (b) and (c) above, Contractor is solely responsible for arranging for the conduct of the audit, and for its cost. County may withhold the estimated cost of the audit or 10 percent of the contract amount, whichever is greater, or the final payment, from Contractor until County receives the audit from Contractor. 28. Authorization. Contractor, or the representative(s) signing this Contract on behalf of Contractor, represents and warrants that it has full power and authority to enter into this Contract and to perform the obligations set forth herein. 29. No Implied Waiver. The waiver by County of any breach of any term or provision of this Contract will not be deemed to be a waiver of such term or provision or of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term or provision contained herein. Attachment D Score Sheet Understanding of Program and of CCC Approach to service provision, any special resources, procedures Relevant Experience/Expertise of Key Personnel References Sub-total Oral Presentation & Interview Total Score 1 Nielsen Merksamer 3.5 4 3.75 4 15.25 3.50 18.75 2 Nossaman LLP 4 4.25 3.75 3.75 15.75 4.50 20.25 3 Quintana, Watts & Hartman 2 2 2.50 2.5 9.00 - 9.00 1 Alcalde & Fay 3.5 3 3.25 3 12.75 3.00 15.75 2 Federal Advocates Inc.3 2.75 3.00 3.5 12.25 4.00 16.25 3 Smith Dawson & Andrews 3 3.5 3.25 2.75 12.50 3.25 15.75 Scale 0 Not Acceptable Non-responsive, fails to meet RFQ specification. 1 Poor Below average, falls short of expectations, is substandard to that which is the average or expected, has a low probability of success in achieving objectives. 2 Fair Has a reasonable probability of success, however, some objectives may not be met. 3 Average Acceptable, achieves all objectives in a reasonable fashion per RFQ. This will be the baseline score for each item with adjustments based on interpretation. 4 Above Average / Good Very good probability of success, better than that which is average or expected as the norm. Achieves all objectives per RFQ requirements and expectations. 5 Excellent / Exceptional Exceeds expectations, very innovative, clearly superior to that which is average or expected as the norm. Attachment E RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/461, approving a side letter agreement, ratified on June 5, 2019, between Contra Costa County and Teamsters Local 856 to revise Section 19 - Medical, Dental, & Life Insurance of the current Memorandum of Understanding (July 1, 2016 - June 30, 2022). FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated plan year costs of the negotiated changes to healthcare subsidy use the same assumptions as those used for the Coalition Healthcare bargaining and costing. Those assumptions are: 2019 enrollment (1,471 covered members), no migration of plans (ie. used 2019 enrollment), an 8% medical inflation rate on plans other than Teamsters, for the Teamsters trust plan newly contracted medical inflation rates for the three year period, and a current comparable subsidy increase of 50% of the medical inflation rate (negotiated subsidy rate currently in place). Using these assumptions the estimated year-over-year plan year additional cost increases are $289,000 for plan year 2020, $624,000 for plan year 2021, and $886,000 for plan year 2022. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller, Dianne Dinsmore, Human Resources Director, All County Departments (via CAO) D.12 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution No. 2019/461 Teamsters Local 856 -modification of Medical, Dental, & Life Insurance BACKGROUND: This Side Letter arises out of a request by Teamsters to reopen its MOU with the County for the limited purpose of bargaining over healthcare following the approval on December 4, 2018, of an agreement on healthcare between the County and the Union Healthcare Coalition. Teamsters is not a member of the Union Healthcare Coalition. The County and Teamsters reached a Tentative Agreement on healthcare for employees on May 14, 2019, which was ratified on June 5, 2019. In summary, the County and Teamsters agreed to modify one section of the MOU. All other terms and conditions of the MOU between the County and Teamsters (July 1, 2016 – June 30, 2022) remain unchanged. The following are highlights of the changes to Section 19 of the MOU: Health, Life, & Dental Care Beginning January 1, 2020, the County will provide a premium subsidy of up to 75% of the second lowest priced non-deductible/non-Teamsters HMO plan (currently Kaiser A) for Employee and Employee +1, and 76.5% for Employee +2 or more. 1. Beginning January 1, 2021, the County will provide a premium subsidy of up to 78.5% of the second lowest priced non-deductible/non-Teamsters-sponsored HMO plan for all tiers. 2. Beginning January 1, 2020, the County will provide a premium subsidy of up to 80% of the second lowest priced non-deductible/non-Teamsters-sponsored HMO plan for all tiers. 3. Beginning January 1, 2020, annual contributions into an HSA for active employees who are enrolled in an eligible High Deductible Health Plan and who have an HSA. 4. Expanded purview of the Joint Labor/Management Benefits Committee and clarification that Teamsters is not a member of the Union Healthcare Coalition. 5. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Members will not receive the healthcare benefits agreed to in the tentative agreement between Teamsters and the County. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/461 Teamsters Side Letter dated May 14, 2019 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Siigned Resolution 2019/461 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/461 In The Matter Of: Approving the Side Letter between Contra Costa County and Teamsters, Local 856 providing for healthcare The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors acting in its capacity as Governing Board of the County of Contra Costa and all districts of which it is the ex-officio governing Board RESOLVES THAT: Effective upon adoption, the attached Side Letter of Agreement dated May 14, 2019 between the County of Contra Costa and Teamsters, Local 856 be ADOPTED. Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: Robert Campbell, Auditor-Controller, Dianne Dinsmore, Human Resources Director, All County Departments (via CAO) RECOMMENDATION(S): AUTHORIZE a waiver of Assessor fees relating to acquiring Secured Assessment Roll and Property Characteristics data for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission/Association of Bay Area Governments, APPROVE Appropriations Adjustment No. 005089 transferring appropriations in the amount of $19,700 from the County's Contingency Reserve (0990) to the Assessor's Office (0016) to defray the costs of providing this data, and REQUEST the Assessor’s Office to provide the requested information as soon as possible. (Supervisor Mitchoff) FISCAL IMPACT: The recommendation would require a one-time distribution of $19,700 from the County’s Contingency Reserve (0990). BACKGROUND: The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC)/Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) staff is undertaking a major data collection effort to assist with Plan Bay Area and other key planning initiatives. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Supervisor Karen Mitchoff (925) 521-7100 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: D.13 To:Board of Supervisors From:Supervisors Federal D. Glover and Karen Mitchoff Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:WAIVER OF ASSESSOR FEE FOR RELEASE OF PROPERTY CHARACTERISTICS DATA TO MTC BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) MTC/ABAG staff need to collect property value and characteristic data from Assessors in each of the nine Bay Area counties. Collection of this data is key to upcoming planning initiatives such as the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, as well as a number of other regional planning efforts. Many counties were asking MTC/ABAG to pay fees that would be cost prohibitive to pay across each of the nine counties. As such, MTC has worked through its commissioners to request fee waivers from high-fee counties. Timely collection of the property value and characteristics data is key to upcoming housing and land use, energy analysis, hazards assessment, and travel modeling efforts. The data and planning analysis from the data will be shared, subject to any data privacy requirements, with counties and jurisdictions to further planning efforts regionwide. To date, fee waivers have been obtained from Alameda ($20,000), Santa Clara ($49,700), and Solano ($48,156) counties. Additionally, Napa and San Francisco Counties provided the data at no cost without having to take formal action to waive their respective fees. Small fees to San Mateo ($2,745), Sonoma ($270), and Marin ($80) Counties have been paid. The Assessor's Office relies on fee revenue to offset costs of assembling and providing property characteristics data. The current fee charged by the Assessor for this service is $19,700. To ensure that Contra Costa County and its residents gain the full advantage of participation in this major regional undertaking, it is necessary for the Board of Supervisors to reimburse the Assessor's Office budget in the amount of $19,700 from the County’s General Contingency Reserve in exchange for the County's waiver of the fee to MTC. ATTACHMENTS TC27_AP005089 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a Consulting Services Agreement (“contract”) with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. (“Mark Thomas”), in an amount not to exceed $250,000, for the period June 11, 2019 through May 7, 2022, to provide on-call civil engineering services, Countywide. (Project No. Various)(All Districts) FISCAL IMPACT: Work performed under this on-call contract is funded by developer fees, local, state and federal funds for road, flood control, and airport projects. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department is involved in various projects in the County that require civil engineering services for road, flood control, and airport projects. After a solicitation process, Mark Thomas was selected as one of eight firms to provide civil engineering services on an “on-call” basis. The Consultant will augment Public Works staff on an as-needed basis. They will be used as an extension of Public Works staff during busy times when extra help is needed or when in-house expertise is not available. This on-call contract will be in effect for thirty-six months. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kevin Emigh, 925-313-2233 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 1 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., Countywide. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Government Code Section 31000 and 4525 authorizes the County to contract for services including the type of civil engineering that Mark Thomas provides. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without approval from the Board of Supervisors, there is possible delay in completing projects requiring civil engineering services. Executing this contract will facilitate the process of design and construction for various Public Works projects requiring civil engineering expertise. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a Consulting Services Agreement (“contract”) with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc. (“Mark Thomas”), in an amount not to exceed $250,000, for the period June 11, 2019 through May 7, 2022, to provide on-call structural engineering services, Countywide. (Project Nos. Various)(All Districts) FISCAL IMPACT: Work performed under this on-call contract is funded by developer fees, local, state and federal funds for road, flood control, and airport projects. BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department is involved in various projects in the County that require structural engineering services for road, flood control, and airport projects. After a solicitation process, Mark Thomas was selected as one of seven firms to provide structural engineering services on an “on-call” basis. The Consultant will be used to provide structural engineering services as in-house expertise is not available. This on-call contract will be in effect for thirty-six months. Government Code Section 31000 and 4525 authorizes the County to contract for services including the type of structural engineering that Mark Thomas provides. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kevin Emigh, 925-313-2233 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 2 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas & Company, Inc., Countywide. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without approval from the Board of Supervisors, there is possible delay in completing projects requiring structural engineering services. Executing this contract will facilitate the process of design and construction for various Public Works projects requiring structural engineering expertise. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Traffic Resolution No. 2019/4483 to prohibit stopping, parking, or standing of vehicles at all times on the south side of Olympic Boulevard (Road No. 3441), beginning at a point 36 feet west of the centerline of Panoramic Way (Road No. 3845BE) and extending westerly a distance of 22 feet; RESCIND Traffic Resolution No. 1243, adopted October 15, 1965, and Traffic Resolution No. 3566, adopted August 17, 1993, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Walnut Creek area. FISCAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Monish Sen, 925.313.2187 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Prohibit stopping, parking, or standing of vehicles at all times on a portion of Olympic Boulevard (Road No. 3441), Walnut Creek area. BACKGROUND: Parking restrictions were approved by the Board of Supervisors on October 15, 1965 at this location, based on postal mail delivery, which is no longer deposited at this location. Therefore, the Public Works Department Traffic Section recommends rescinding this resolution, as it is no longer necessary. Parking restrictions at this location were also approved by the Board of Supervisors in 1993 for use by County Connection as a bus stop. On March 13, 2019, County Connection contacted the Public Works Department indicating that bus service at this location was no longer needed, effective March 10, 2019. Therefore, the Public Works Department Traffic Section also recommends rescinding this resolution, since bus services have been terminated at this site. However, after review of the site, it was determined that parking restrictions should remain in place to provide improved sight lines for vehicles entering Olympic Boulevard from Panoramic Way. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Parking will remain restricted based on features no longer in place at this location. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS TR 2019/4483 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Traffic Resolution No. 2019/4483 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Traffic Resolution on June 11, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. 2019/4483 ABSTAIN: Supervisorial District II SUBJECT: Prohibit stopping, parking, or standing of vehicles at all times on a portion of Olympic Boulevard (Road No. 3441), Walnut Creek area. The Contra Costa Board of Supervisors RESOLVES that: Based on recommendations by the County Public Works Department's Transportation Engineering Division, and pursuant to County Ordinance Code Sections 46-2.002 - 46-2.012, the following traffic regulation is established (and other actions taken, as indicated): Pursuant to Section 22507 and 21458 of the California Vehicle Code, stopping, parking, or standing of vehicles is hereby declared to be prohibited at all times on the south side of Olympic Boulevard (Road No. 3441), beginning at a point 36 feet west of the centerline of Panoramic Way (Road No. 3845BE) and extending westerly a distance of 22 feet, Walnut Creek area. Traffic Resolution Nos. 1243 and 3566, pertaining to restricted parking on Olympic Boulevard (Road No. 3441), are hereby rescinded. MS:sr Orig. Dept: Public Works (Traffic) Contact: Monish Sen, 313-2187 cc: California Highway Patrol Sheriff Department TRAFFIC RESOLUTION NO. 2019/4483 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct Copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: David Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator By , Deputy RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, a purchase and sale agreement to convey approximately 2,242 square feet of excess property to Gurshamjeet Cheema (APN 068-132-049), a purchase and sale agreement to convey approximately 4,164 square feet of excess property to Premnauth and Uma Persaud (APN 068-132-024), and a purchase and sale agreement to convey approximately 141 square feet of excess property to Susan E. Taber, trustee of the Lloyd G. Taber and Susan E. Taber Trust dated March 1, 2004, (APN 068-132-048), all near A Street and Bryan Avenue, in Antioch, pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 960, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Antioch area. DETERMINE that said properties were acquired on Contra Costa Transportation Authority’s behalf for highway purposes, and that the properties are no longer necessary for highway purposes. (Project No. 4660-6X4168, [SCH# 2004092135]) APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair, Board of Supervisors, to execute, on behalf of the County, three Grant Deeds to convey the above excess right of way to the grantees. DIRECT the Real Estate Division of the Public Works Department to cause said Grant Deeds to be recorded at the County Clerk-Recorder’s APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jann Edmunds, 925. 957-2454 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 4 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE the Conveyance of Excess Right of Way to Gurshamjeet Cheema, Premnauth and Uma Persaud, and Susan E. Taber, Antioch area. RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) Office, and to pay all associated transaction costs. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Contra Costa Transportation Authority Funds (CCTA). BACKGROUND: Between 2007 and 2009, the County acquired right of way for the Sunset Drive Extension (APN’s 068-132-024, 068-132-047, and 068-132-049), in Antioch for highway purposes. The properties were acquired entirely with CCTA funds. The County was responsible for acquiring right of way for the project on CCTA’s behalf because CCTA did not have right of way staff. The improvements for the Sunset Drive Extension have been completed and the excess portions of land are no longer required for the project or for other highway purposes which cannot be developed independently. CCTA has requested that the County dispose of the excess property. The adjacent property owners are willing to accept the excess properties to be used as additional plottage. Under separate purchase and sale agreements, the County will agree to convey approximately 2,242 square feet of excess property to Gurshamjeet Cheema (APN 068-132-049), approximately 4,164 square feet of excess property to Premnauth and Uma Persaud (APN 068-132-024), approximately 141 square feet of excess property to Susan E. Taber, trustee of the Lloyd G. Taber and Susan E. Taber Trust dated March 1, 2004, (APN 068-132-048). The properties will be conveyed in their as-is condition. Under each purchase and sale agreement, the grantee(s) will release the County from all claims related to the condition of the property, and the grantee(s) will indemnify the County from third-party claims arising from the present or future condition or use of the property. The properties are no longer required for highway purposes and Real Estate Division staff recommend that the Board of Supervisors approve these conveyances. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County would continue to own and be liable for the maintenance of these properties that are no longer required for highway or other County purposes. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Cheema Grant Deed - Purchase & Sale Agreement Persaud Grant Deed - Purchase & Sale Agreement Taber Grant Deed - Purchase & Sale Agreement MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Cheema Grant Deed Signed: Persaud Grant Deed Signed: Taber Grant Deed RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the conveyance of surplus Real Property containing a total of approximately 12,884 square feet of land located along Humboldt Avenue, to the City of San Pablo (City), in connection with the I-80 San Pablo Dam Road Interchange Project for roadway purposes, pursuant to Government Code Section 25526.5. Project No. 4660-6X4170. DETERMINE said property to be surplus and no longer necessary for county purposes, and its estimated value does not exceed twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000). AUTHORIZE the Chair, Board of Supervisors, to execute a Grant Deed on behalf of Contra Costa County (County). DIRECT the Real Estate Division of the Public Works Department to cause said Grant Deed and a certified copy of this Board Order to be delivered to the grantee for recording in the office of the County Clerk-Recorder. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Contra Costa Transportation Authority Funds. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Angela Bell, (925) 957-2451 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conveyance of Surplus Real Property for roadway purposes to the City of San Pablo. BACKGROUND: In 2012, the County entered into a Right of Way Services Agreement with Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) to provide right of way services in connection with the I-80 San Pablo Dam Road Interchange Project (Project). The Project is now complete, and the remaining portions of property acquired on Humboldt Avenue, within the City limits of San Pablo, are no longer required by the County or CCTA. CCTA has requested that the surplus real property be conveyed to the City for proper ownership and maintenance. Real Estate Division staff has estimated the value of the property to be $25,000 or less. On June 25, 2013, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project. (DCD #13-25 [SCH# 2009082009]). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County would continue to own and have liability for real property within the City of San Pablo. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Grant Deed MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Grant Deed RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/188 authorizing the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute Right of Way Certifications required for state and federally funded road projects; and, DIRECT the Principal Real Property Agent to provide a copy of the Resolution to the appropriate office of Caltrans, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact BACKGROUND: In order to obtain federal and state aid assistance in connection with APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kevin Emigh 925-313-2233 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 6 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Execution of Right of Way Certifications, Countywide BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) state and federally funded road projects, and for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to approve the projects for advertising, it is necessary that the County certify to Caltrans that the rights of way necessary for the proper execution of the projects will be or have been acquired. Caltrans will accept Right of Way Certifications signed by the Public Works Director if the Board of Supervisors has adopted a Resolution authorizing him or her to sign the certifications. A copy of the Right of Way Certification (“R/W Certification”) forms currently required by Caltrans are attached to the Resolution, which accompanies this Board Order. The Caltrans forms provide for detailed information about the right of way and the project. They also require the County to certify that the right of way has been duly acquired and to defend and indemnify Caltrans if the right of way is not clear as certified. Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution to authorize the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute R/W Certifications in connection with County road projects funded by the state or federal government. The authorization given by the attached Resolution is valid for a two-year period, at which time the Public Works Department will have to seek further authorization. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Bidding and construction of federally funded public works projects with short funding deadlines will be subject to delay and potential loss of funds. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2019/188 Exhibit 13-A Exhibit 13-B MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2019/188 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/188 IN THE MATTER OF referencing the following background information: In order to obtain state and federal aid assistance in connection with state and federally funded road projects, and for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) to approve the projects for advertising, it is necessary that the County certify to Caltrans that the rights of way necessary for the proper execution of projects will be or have been acquired. Caltrans will accept Right of Way Certifications (“R/W Certification”) signed by the Public Works Director or designee, if the Board of Supervisors adopts a Resolution authorizing him or her to sign the certification. Copies of the R/W Certification forms currently required by Caltrans are attached to this Resolution. WHEREAS Caltrans will accept R/W Certifications signed by the Public Works Director or designee, if the Board of Supervisors has adopted a resolution authorizing him or her to sign the certification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Board AUTHORIZES the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute all R/W Certifications required for state and federally funded road projects using the forms attached to this Resolution. The Board DIRECTS the Principal Real Property Agent to forward a copy of the Resolution to the appropriate office of Caltrans. The authorization provided by this Resolution is valid for two years from the date of adoption. Contact: Kevin Emigh 925-313-2233 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 13-A Short Form Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project Page 1 of 6 LPP 13-02 December 30, 2013 EXHIBIT 13-A SHORT FORM RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (Off-State Highway System Project) NAME OF THE LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY NOTE: This form is intended for projects that do NOT require R/W acquisition, relocation assistance, have NO railroad involvement, and the ONLY Utility Relocation involvement is limited to utility cover adjustments. For each item below, except Item 5, select the ONE option most suitable to your project. If the chosen option directs you to use Exhibit 13-B, please stop. This Short Form is not applicable to your project. RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION No. 1 Project ID Project Location General Description 1. STATUS OF REQUIRED PROPERTY RIGHTS No acquisition of right of way is required. All proposed work is within existing right of way. Right of way has been acquired in accordance with applicable policy and procedure covering the acquisition of real property. LPA has legal and physical possession, right to enter, and required permits. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. 2. STATUS OF AFFECTED OPERATING RAILROAD FACILITIES None affected. The________________________ Railroad has approved the proposed work, which is within their Right of Way but does not require the adjustment of railroad facilities. The necessary clauses will be placed in the contract special provisions. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. The_______________________ Railroad (and when needed, the Public Utilities Commission) has approved the proposed work, which is within the railroad right of way and does require the adjustment of railroad facilities. The railroad, or its contract forces, will provide the necessary labor, materials and/or equipment to adjust their facilities. The necessary clauses will be placed in the contract special provisions. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. 3. MATERIAL SITE(S) None required. Material site(s) required. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. EXHIBIT 13-A Local Assistance Procedures Manual Short Form Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project Page 2 of 6 December 30, 2013 LPP 13-02 4. DISPOSAL SITE(S) None required. Disposal site(s) required. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. 5. STATUS OF REQUIRED UTILITY RELOCATION (Check all that apply) No relocation required, therefore Buy America requirements do not apply. Existing utilities located within project limits are shown on Project Plan. Project is not covered by NEPA document; therefore, Buy America requirements do not apply. Utility Agreements are not required on this project; therefore, Buy America requirements do not apply. Utility involvement is limited to adjusting UTILITY COVERS (manhole cover, water valve cover, and box lids) to grade and said work is compliant with all terms and conditions under MAP-21 including Buy America requirements. If this box is checked, please complete page 5 of this form entitled “Utility Cover Adjustment Summary” and provide a copy of the Specific Authorization if federally participating. All utility work (other than the adjustment of utility covers) has been completed. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. All utility work (other than the adjustment of utility covers) will be completed by a stated date prior to award of the contract. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. All necessary arrangements have been made for the completion of all remaining utility work (other than the adjustment of utility covers) required to be coordinated with project construction. Arrangements have been made with the owners of all utility encroachments which will remain within the right of way of the project so that adequate control of the right of way will be achieved. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. Utility facilities (other than the adjustment of utility covers ) will be relocated by the Project’s Contractor under bid items. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. 6. RIGHT OF WAY CLEARANCE There are no improvements or obstructions located within the limits of this project. All right of way clearance work has been completed and there are no improvements or obstructions remaining within the right of way area required for construction. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. All necessary arrangements have been made for remaining right of way clearance work to be undertaken and completed as required for proper coordination with the construction schedule. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. 7. AIRSPACE AGREEMENTS There are no airspace lease properties within the limits of this project. All necessary arrangements have been made with airspace lessee(s) and/or in Contract Provisions to minimize conflicts between lessee’s activities and contractor’s operations. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. Airspace lease has been cancelled. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. Other (If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B) Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 13-A Short Form Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project Page 3 of 6 LPP 13-02 December 30, 2013 8. COMPLIANCE WITH RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS Compliance was not required as there were no displacements for this project. Occupants who have not yet moved from the right of way will be protected against unnecessary inconvenience and disproportionate injury or any action coercive in nature. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. LPA has complied with all the steps relative to the relocation advisory assistance and payments as required by applicable policy and procedure, and no person has been required to relocate without at least a 90 day written notice. If residential relocation was involved, all individuals and/or families have been relocated to decent, safe and sanitary housing, or the LPA has made replacement housing available to the displacees. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. 9. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS None Required. Agency Agreement No. (If checked, please attach a copy) 10. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION No environmental mitigation parcels are required for this project. All environmental mitigation parcels on this project have been acquired. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. Acquisition of environmental mitigation parcels is ongoing. If this box is checked, please use Exhibit 13-B. EXHIBIT 13-A Local Assistance Procedures Manual Short Form Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project Page 4 of 6 December 30, 2013 LPP 13-02 11. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify the right of way on this project as conforming to 23 CFR 635.309(c)(1) and all terms and conditions under MAP-21, including Buy America requirements. The project may be advertised with contract award being made at any time. 12. INDEMNIFICATION BY LOCAL AGENCY This Local Public Agency agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) from any and all liabilities which may result in the event the right of way for this project is not clear as certified. LPA shall pay from its own non-matching funds, any costs which arise out of delays to the construction of the project because utility facilities have not been removed or relocated, or because rights of way have not been made available to LPA for the orderly performance of the project work. Distribution: 1) Local agency completes this form, signs and sends it to the DLAE. 1) DLAE sends a copy to District Right of Way Local Programs Coordinator, keeps a copy for his/her files, and sends the signed original back to the local agency. LOCAL PUBLIC AGENCY CALTRANS ACCEPTANCE The undersigned Caltrans Official has reviewed this Right of Way Certification as to form and content. Based on the review of the documents submitted, the Certificate is accepted on behalf of the local public agency. It remains the sole responsibility of the local public agency to ensure compliance with the Uniform Act. Project ID: Authorized Resolution No.: Dated: Accepted as to form and content: By: By: Title: Title: Date: Date: Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 13-A Short Form Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project Page 5 of 6 LPP 13-02 December 30, 2013 UTILITY COVER ADJUSTMENT SUMMARY Items to be disclosed on this summary include: Covers of utility facilities, either publicly owned (by City/County and other public agencies, including the project sponsoring agency) or privately owned that services the general population. Utility covers of facility that directly services the street/roadway operation (such as an electric pull box, which services streetlight and traffic signals) do not require disclosure on this form. a) PHYSICAL COVER ADJUSTMENTS PERFORMED BY OWNER Notice # & Notice Date Utility Agreement Date Owner Liability % Owner/LPA Type of Facility Encroachment Permit # Federal Participation Yes (Y)* No (N) *Include copy of Specific Authorization b) UTILITY COVER ADJUSTMENTS WILL BE PERFORMED BY PROJECT CONTRACTOR Bid Item # Notice # & Notice Date Utility Agreement Date Owner Liability % Owner/LPA Type of Facility Federal Participation Yes (Y)* No (N) *Include copy of Specific Authorization c) FEDERAL PARTICIPATION Yes No The adjustments comply with the 23 CFR 645.119 and the R/W Utility Relocation process in Chapter 14 of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM) Yes No These adjustments are required as the direct result of the proposed construction activities and the local agency is legally liable to pay for the adjustment Yes No Adjustments specified for Federal participation have received FHWA Specific Authorization (Exhibit 14-C, LAPM) approval? If “no”, not federally participating. EXHIBIT 13-A Local Assistance Procedures Manual Short Form Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project Page 6 of 6 December 30, 2013 LPP 13-02 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 13-B Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project LPP 18-01 Page 1 of 9 January 2019 EXHIBIT 13-B RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION LOCAL ASSISTANCE PROJECT (Off State Highway System) Local Agency: NOTE: This form is intended for use on local assistance projects, off the State Highway System (SHS), where federal funds are used and where Right of Way (R/W) or rights in real property are required. This form could also be used when work required for local agency projects is located primarily off the SHS but may also encroach onto the SHS. (Eliminate this paragraph before submitting document to your DLAE) Right of Way Certification No.: Project ID: (Insert 1, 2, or 3 for the type of Certification being made) Project Location: General Project Description: 1. STATUS OF REQUIRED RIGHT OF WAY: Right of Way (has been) (will be) acquired in accordance with applicable policy and procedure covering the acquisition of real property. Local Agency (has) (will have) legal and physical possession and right to enter on all lands as follows: A. Total number of parcels required 1: For items A 1-8 below and B on page 2, if total at time of completing certification is 0, enter 0 on the number line (or B line) and eliminate corresponding table/s. 1. Parcels acquired (escrow closed or Final Order of Condemnation recorded): (To add table rows below, set cursor to right of last column in empty table set, then press enter, additional table rows will populate.) Parcel Number Owner Project R/W Required 2 Excess (Yes or No) Close of Escrow/Final Order of Condemnation Date 2. Parcels covered by Order for Possession: Parcel Number Owner Project R/W Required2 Effective Date of OP 3. Parcels covered by executed Right of Way Contract with Possession Clause: Parcel Number Owner Project R/W Required2 Effective Date Date Funds Made Available to Owner/Deposited into Escrow 3 1 Parcels listed in items A1-A7 on pages 1 and 2 should total the number shown on line 1A above. 2 Items A1-A7: List as full acquisition, partial acquisition, fee, permanent easement (including type), temporary construction easement, etc. Detail should be added showing expiration dates of documents with fixed termination dates, i.e., temporary easements. 3 Funds must be deposited into an escrow account and be made available (able to withdraw), as legally permissible, to the grantor/s, as a condition of use of a possession clause in a Right of Way contact. Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 13-B Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project LPP 18-01 Page 2 of 9 January 2019 4. Parcels covered by Possession and Use Agreement only: Parcel Number Owner Project R/W Required2 Effective Date Date Funds Deposited Into Escrow 4 5. Parcels covered by Right of Entry only (Requires HQs R/W and FHWA pre-approval)5: Parcel Number Owner Project R/W Required2 Effective Date Date Funds Deposited into Escrow 6. Parcels Covered by Resolution of Necessity only 6: Parcel Number Owner Project R/W Required2 Local Agency Resolution Date Anticipated OP Service Date (all parties) Anticipated OP Effective Date 7. Parcels covered by other acquisition documents as follows 7: Parcel Number or Location/ (P.M.) Owner Project R/W Required2 Type of Document Effective Date Expiration Date Date Funds Deposited into Escrow4 8. Number of Parcels with a value in excess of $500,000 Dual Appraisal for each parcel (recommended but not required)? Yes No B. Construction Permits, other required permits 8: Location/ (P.M.) Owner Type of Document Effective Date Expiration Date 2. STATUS OF ACCESS CONTROL: Select appropriate statement/s and remove those that do not apply: Conventional Highway, a highway with no control of access. Abutting property owners have access rights. (OR) Freeway/Expressway, a highway with limited/restricted rights of access. (OR) Non-Interstate Access Controlled Highway (or other facility with full access control). Except as provided in the approved plans for the project, all rights of access to, or from the section of highway to be improved under the project and the abutting property either are prohibited by law, or have been acquired, or are being acquired in condemnation proceedings heretofore commenced and which will be prosecuted to completion. 4 Funds must be deposited into an escrow account and be made available (able to withdraw), as legally permissible, to the grantor/s, as a condition of use. 5 Rights of Entry must only be used in emergencies, or extremely unusual/extraordinary circumstances. All Rights of Entry must be pre-approved by the Division of HQs RW&LS and approved by FHWA. Funds must be deposited into an escrow account and be made available (able to withdraw), as legally permissible, to the grantor/s, as a condition of using a right of entry. 6 To be used only rarely in a Certification No. 3; Resolution of Necessity must be adopted and the Order for Possession served, but is not yet effective. 7 This section covers acquisitions where the document is a license, permit etc., not otherwise covered by A1-A6 above. Examples include Licenses from State Lands Commission, Flood Control Districts, and Letters of Consent from US Forest Service. 8 These permits are not counted as parcels, are not appraised, recorded, or require payment (e.g. Permits to Enter). Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 13-B Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project LPP 18-01 Page 3 of 9 January 2019 (OR) Except as provided in the approved plans for the project, all rights of access to, or from the section of highway to be improved under the project and the abutting property either are prohibited by law, or have been acquired under a previous project. 3. STATUS OF AFFECTED RAILROAD OPERATING FACILITIES - Select appropriate statement/s and remove what does not apply: None affected. (OR) The Railroad has approved the proposed work, which is within their right of way but which does not require the adjustment of railroad facilities. The necessary clauses will be placed in the contract special provisions. The project may now be advertised. (OR) The Railroad (and when needed, the Public Utilities Commission) has approved the proposed work, which is within the railroad right of way and does require the adjustment of railroad facilities. The railroad, or its contract forces, will provide the necessary labor, materials and/or equipment to adjust their facilities. The necessary clauses will be placed in the contract special provisions. The project may now be advertised. CPUC Approval Type and Date: C&M Execution Date: 4. MATERIAL SITE(S) - Select appropriate statement; remove those that do not apply: None required. Commercial Optional site(s) secured as follows: Mandatory site(s) secured as follows: Parcel Agreement No. Owner Document Effective Date Expiration Date 5. DISPOSAL SITE(S) - Select appropriate statement; remove those that do not apply: None required. Commercial Optional site(s) secured as follows: Mandatory site(s) secured as follows: Parcel Agreement No. Owner Document Effective Date Expiration Date 6. STATUS OF REQUIRED UTILITY RELOCATIONS: There are no Utility Relocations required on the project. Therefore, Buy America compliance does not apply to the utility portion of the project. (OR) All utility work has been or will be completed in accordance with applicable policy and procedure covering the adjustment of utility facilities. All utility notices have been issued and arrangements have been made with the owners of all conflicting utility encroachments remaining within the right of way, so that adequate control of the project right of way will be achieved. If applicable, federal participation has been determined. Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 13-B Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project LPP 18-01 Page 4 of 9 January 2019 (AND)  All utility work has been completed. Project specific utility agreement(s) is (are) fully executed and include(s) the Buy America language. Buy America compliance is not applicable for utility relocations as Utility Agreements are not required. (OR)  All utility work will be completed by a stated date prior to award of the contract (see schedule below). Project specific utility agreement(s) is(are) fully executed and include(s) the Buy America language. Buy America compliance is not applicable for utility relocations as Utility Agreements are not required. (OR)  All necessary arrangements have been made for remaining utility work to be completed as required for proper coordination with project construction. The special provisions in the contract provide for the coordination (see schedule below). Project specific utility agreement(s) is(are) fully executed and include(s) the Buy America language. Buy America compliance is not applicable for utility relocations as Utility Agreements are not required. (AND when applicable) The following utilities are located within the project Rights of Way but require no relocation: Company Type Facility The following utilities are in conflict with the project and require relocation as follows: (If applicable) R/W Notice Company Type of Liability % Utility Federal Relocation and Notice Date Facility (Owner=O) Agreement. Participation Date & End Date (Local Agency=C) Date (yes/no)9 Concurrent with construction (or) Bid Item/s listed below 10 9 A copy of Specific Authorization to Relocate Utility Facilities memorandum must be attached for each facility relocation item. 10 Additional information is required for each bid item if highway contractor will complete work as part of the highway contract. Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 13-B Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project LPP 18-01 Page 5 of 9 January 2019 (AND) Bid Item Number Owner/Type Facility Liability % (Owner/Local Agency) Federal Participation (Yes/No) 7. RIGHT OF WAY CLEARANCE: There were no improvements or obstructions located within the limits of this project. (OR) All right of way clearance work has been completed and there are no improvements or obstructions remaining within the right of way area required for construction. (OR) All necessary arrangements have been made for remaining right of way clearance work to be undertaken and completed as required for proper coordination with the construction schedule as follows: Parcel No. Location/ P.M. Description Salvable/ Non Salvable Method of Disposal 11 Date Site Available to Construction Contractor 8. AIRSPACE AGREEMENTS: There are no airspace lease properties within the limits of this project. (OR) All necessary arrangements have been made with airspace lessee(s) and/or special provisions in the contract to minimize conflicts between lessee’s activities and contractor’s operations. (OR) Airspace lease (describe) has been cancelled effective (date). (OR) Explanation of other disposition of airspace lease area. 9. COMPLIANCE WITH RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS Compliance was not required as there were no displacements for this project. (OR) The Local Agency has complied with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act, as amended. The Local Agency has also complied with all the steps relative to relocation advisory assistance and payments as required by applicable policies and procedures, and no person has been required to relocate without at least 90 days written notice. If residential relocation was involved, all individuals and/or families have been relocated to a decent, safe and sanitary housing, or the Local Agency has made replacement housing available to the relocatees. 11 Demolition Contract, Construction Contract, or Owner. Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 13-B Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project LPP 18-01 Page 6 of 9 January 2019 Types of relocation involved on this project. Check all that apply. Personal property relocation Residential relocation Business, farm or nonprofit relocation Exceptions: _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________ . Occupants of residences, businesses, farms or nonprofit organizations who have not yet moved from the right of way will be protected against unnecessary inconvenience and disproportionate injury or any action coercive in nature. Parcel Number Location/(P.M.) (Owner) (Tenant) Name of Occupant Date to Vacate Type of Occupancy 12 10. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS None required. (OR) Agency Agreement Number or Document Number Attach a Copy of Each Cooperative Agreement. 11. ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION No environmental mitigation parcels are required for this project. (OR) All environmental mitigation parcels for the project have been acquired. (OR) Acquisition of environmental mitigation parcels is ongoing. (Give detailed explanation) 12. INDEMNIFICATION BY LOCAL AGENCY The Local Agency agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Department of Transportation (Caltrans) from any and all liabilities which may result in the event the right of way for this project is not clear as certified. The Local Agency shall pay from its own non-matching funds, any costs which arise out of delays to the construction of the project because utility facilities have not been removed or relocated, or because rights of way have not been made available to Local Agency for the orderly performance of the project work. 13. CERTIFICATION (USE THE APPROPRIATE STATEMENT) I hereby certify the right of way on this project as conforming to 23 CFR 635.309(b) and (c)(1) or (c)(2). The project may be advertised with contract award being made at any time. 12 Residential, Business, Farm, Nonprofit Organization, or Personal Property only. Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 13-B Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project LPP 18-01 Page 7 of 9 January 2019 (OR) I hereby certify the right of way on this project as conforming to 23 CFR 635.309(c)(3)(i)(iii)(iv). The project may be advertised at any time. The project will be certified as conforming to 23 CFR 635.309 (b) and (c)(1) or (c)(2) by (Date) . (Attach letter explaining why a Conditional R/W Certification No. 3 is being used and substantiate that the Certification No. 1 or No. 2 date given above is realistic.) (OR) I hereby certify the right of way on this project as conforming to 23 CFR 635.309(c)(3)(ii),(iii) and (iv) with Work-Around. The project may be advertised at any time. Appropriate notification has been included in the Bid Documents. An updated Certification will be provided by (Date) . (Attach letter explaining why a Special Certification No. 3 with Work-Around is being used.) (When updating the Special Certification No. 3 with Work-Around, use the following statement. This statement is required no later than 15 days prior to bid opening. If able to upgrade to a Certification No. 1 or No. 2, use appropriate CFR certification statement referenced above.): I hereby certify the right of way on this project as conforming to 23 CFR 635.309(c)(3)(ii),(iii) and (iv) with Work-Around. The project has been advertised and the contract may be awarded. I have confirmed that all appropriate notifications have been included in the Bid Documents concerning said Work-Around. Local Agency: Project ID: As Authorized by Resolution No.: By: Date Title The undersigned Caltrans Official has reviewed this Right of Way Certification as to form and content. Based on the review of the documents submitted, the Certificate is accepted on behalf of the local public agency. Accepted as to form and content: By: District Deputy Director/Office Chief – Right of Way Date (or person authorized in writing to sign) Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 13-B Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project LPP 18-01 Page 8 of 9 January 2019 (AND) (HQ Right of Way signature required for Projects of Division Interest (PODI’s) depending on delegations identified in the Project Oversight Agreement, Conditional R/W Certification No. 3 and Special R/W Certification No. 3 with Work-Around.) ACCEPTED: By: Chief, Headquarters Division of Right of Way and Land Surveys Date (AND) (FHWA signature block is required for Projects of Division Interest (PODI’s) depending on delegations identified in the Project Oversight Agreement (POA), and Conditional R/W Certification No. 3 and Special R/W Certification No. 3 with Work-Around for projects located on the Interstate system. FHWA concurrence and approval is not required for Certification No. 3 upgrades and Certification No. 3W updates.) APPROVED: By: Realty Officer Date Federal Highway Administration Distribution: 1)Local Agency completes and sends to DLAE for approval. 2)DLAE approves and returns to Local Agency. 3) Local Agency retains approved original in project files. Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 13-B Right of Way Certification Local Assistance Project LPP 18-01 Page 9 of 9 January 2019 Footnote Instructions 1. Parcels listed in items A1 – A7 on pages 1 and 2 should total the number shown on line A above. 2. For sections A1 – A7 list as full acquisition, partial acquisition, fee, permanent easement (including type), temporary construction easement, etc. Detail should be added showing expiration dates of documents with fixed termination dates, i.e., temporary easements. 3. Funds must be deposited into an escrow account and be made available (able to withdraw), as legally permissible, to the grantor, as a condition of use of a possession clause in a right of way contact. 4. Funds must be deposited into an escrow account and be made available (able to withdraw) as legally permissible, to the grantor as a condition of use. 5. Rights of Entry must only be used in emergencies, or extremely unusual/extraordinary circumstances. All Rights of Entry must be pre-approved by the Division of HQs RW&LS and approved by FHWA. Funds must be deposited into an escrow account and be made available (able to withdraw), as legally permissible, to the grantor, as a condition of using a right of entry. 6. An adopted Resolution of Necessity (RON) is the minimum requirement for the use of both a Conditional R/W Certification #3 and/ or a Special R/W Certification #3 with Work-Around, which are rarely used. The Resolution of Necessity must be adopted. 7. This section covers acquisitions where the document is a license, permit etc., not otherwise covered by A1 – A6 above. Examples include Licenses from State Lands Commission, Flood Control Districts, and Letters of Consent from the US Forest Service. 8. These permits are not Project R/W requirements and are neither appraised nor recorded. (e.g. Permits to Enter and Construct). 9. A copy of Specific Authorization to Relocate Facility Utilities Memorandum must be attached for each facility relocation item. 10. Additional information is required for each bid item if highway contractor will complete work as part of highway contract. 11. Demolition Contract, Construction Contractor, or Owner. 12. Residential, Business, Farm, Nonprofit Organization, or Personal Property only. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/193 approving the submission of a claim to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) to seek Fiscal Year 2019/2020 Transportation Development Act funding in the amount of $1,049,500 for bicycle and pedestrian projects sponsored by the County and the cities of Concord, Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Oakley, Orinda, Pittsburg, Pleasant Hill, San Pablo, and San Ramon; and DIRECT the Public Works Director, or designee, to forward the claim to MTC for final approval and final allocation of funding effective July 1, 2019, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 3 funds. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jerry Fahy, 925-313-2276 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 7 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Allocation of Transportation Development Act, Article 3 Funds for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 BACKGROUND: Article 3 of the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Public Utilities Code (PUC) Section 99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), as the regional transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No. 4108 which supersedes MTC Resolution No. 875, Revised, commencing with the Fiscal Year 2014/2015 funding cycle. Resolution No. 4108 delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funds. Each claimant whose project or projects have been prioritized for inclusion in the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 TDA Article 3 countywide coordinated claim is required to submit a resolution from its governing body to MTC requesting an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds. The City of Orinda received written opposition to their TDA, Article 3 Project Application prior to the City’s January 8, 2019 City Council Meeting to consider this item. During the Public Forum on this item, the City Council received public testimony in opposition to the City's TDA, Article 3 Project Application. Following discussion by the City Council, the Council authorized the submittal of the TDA Article 3 Project Application with modifications to the application. County staff recommends the Board of Supervisors approve the submittal of the prioritized list to MTC for final review and approval of all projects considered for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 TDA, Article 3 funding. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve the recommendation and forward the list will eliminate a potential funding source. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Public comment: Nicholas Waranoff Attached written comments Adopted as presented. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2019/193 Attachment A MINUTES ATTACHMENTS public written comment Signed: Resolution No. 2019/193 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/193 IN THE MATTER OF approving and authorizing the recommendation of the Public Works Director, or designee, for allocating the Transportation Development Act (TDA), Article 3 funds for bicycle and pedestrian projects for Fiscal Year 2019/2020 and directing the Public Works Director, or designee, to forward the list to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for final approval and allocation of funding effective July 1, 2019, Countywide. WHEREAS, Article 3 of the TDA, Public Utilities Codes (PUC) Section 99200 et seq., authorizes the submission of claims to a regional transportation planning agency for the funding of projects exclusively for the benefit and/or use of pedestrians and bicyclists; and, WHEREAS, the MTC, as the regional transportation planning agency for the San Francisco Bay region, has adopted MTC Resolution No. 4108, which delineates procedures and criteria for submission of requests for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funds; and, WHEREAS, MTC Resolution No. 4108 requires that requests from eligible claimants for the allocation of TDA Article 3 funds be submitted as part of a single, countywide coordinated claim, composed of certain required documents; and, WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors has undertaken a process in compliance with MTC Resolution No. 4108 for consideration of project proposals submitted by eligible claimants of TDA Article 3 funds in Contra Costa County, and a prioritized list of projects, included as Attachment A of this Resolution, was developed as a result of this process; and, WHEREAS, each claimant in Contra Costa County whose project or projects have been prioritized for inclusion in the Fiscal Year 2019/2020 TDA Article 3 countywide coordinated claim has been forwarded to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors a certified copy of its governing body resolution for submittal to MTC requesting an allocation of TDA Article 3 funds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approves the prioritized list of projects included as Attachment A to this resolution; and furthermore, be it RESOLVED that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors approves the submittal to MTC, of the Contra Costa County Fiscal Year 2019/2020 TDA Article 3 countywide, coordinated claim, composed of the following required documents: (A) transmittal letter; (B) a certified copy of this resolution, including Attachment A; (C) one copy of the governing body resolution and required attachments, for each claimant whose project or projects are the subject of the coordinated claim; and (D) a description of the process for public and staff review of all proposed projects submitted by eligible claimants for prioritization and inclusion in the countywide, coordinated claim. Contact: Jerry Fahy, 925-313-2276 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/175 approving the annual county miles in the Total Maintained Mileage for County Roads Report, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) requires annual total mileage to determine the amount of money allocated to the County from the gasoline tax. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The report cannot be submitted to Caltrans without Board approval. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jim Stein (925)313-2343 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Chris Lau - Maintenance, Liza Mangabay - Finance, Jerry Fahy - Transportation Engineering, Jim Stein - Surveys, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Record C. 8 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve the Annual County Miles in the Total Maintained Mileage for County Roads Report, Countywide. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2019/175 Exhibit A - Contra Costa County Road Mileage MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2019/175 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/175 IN THE MATTER OF: Correcting the Total Maintained Mileage for County Roads Report. (All Districts) WHEREAS, Section 2121 of the Streets and Highways Code provides that in May of each year, each county shall submit to the State Department of Transportation any additions or exclusions from its mileage of maintained county roads, specifying the terminuses and mileage of each route added or excluded; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Transportation certified to the State Controller on May 1, 2018 that the total mileage of maintained county roads in Contra Costa County was 661.62, WHEREAS, the Public Works Director now reports that the total mileage of maintained county roads as of January 1, 2019 is 662.23 miles. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board finds and determines that the mileage of maintained County roads in Contra Costa County is 662.23 and that the mileage of each route added to or excluded from the County's maintained roads is as shown in Exhibit "A," such exhibit being made a part of this resolution. Contact: Jim Stein (925)313-2343 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Chris Lau - Maintenance, Liza Mangabay - Finance, Jerry Fahy - Transportation Engineering, Jim Stein - Surveys, Renee Hutchins - Records, Karen Piona- Record RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/185 approving reduction of performance bond amount for the Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS15-00002 for a project developed by Alamo Glen, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Developers Fees. BACKGROUND: Subdivision Map Act Section 66499.7 of the Government Code allows the local agency to release a portion of the security furnished by the subdivider, if the subdivider requests a partial release. The release of security shall be in conformance with Section 66499.7 of the Government Code and does not apply to the required guarantee and warranty period. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The performance bond amount reduction will not be approved. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Randolf Sanders (925)313-2111 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Jocelyn LaRocque- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Craig Standafer- Engineering Services, Trixie Gothro - Design & Construction, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Low - City of San Ramon, Alex Lopez - Engineering Services, Alamo Glen, LLC C. 9 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Approving reduction of performance bond amount for the Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS15-00002, Alamo area. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2019/185 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2019/185 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/185 IN THE MATTER OF: Approving reduction of performance bond amount for the Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS15-00002 for a project developed by Alamo Glen, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District II). WHERE AS, The Public Works Director has notified this Board that a portion of the improvements in the Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS15-00002 have been completed as provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Alamo Glen, LLC, heretofore approved by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the Subdivision Map. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the performance and guarantee cash bond for the Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS15-00002 approved by the Board on March 27, 2018, is hereby REDUCED to $30,300.00, (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. 7562220, dated February 22, 2018), issued to Alamo Glen, LLC and be RETAINED until further action by this Board. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the payment (labor and materials) cash bond for $101,000.00, auditor’s Deposit Permit No. 7562220 submitted by Alamo Glen, LLC be RETAINED until further action by this Board. Contact: Randolf Sanders (925)313-2111 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Jocelyn LaRocque- Engineering Services, Randolf Sanders- Engineering Services, Craig Standafer- Engineering Services, Trixie Gothro - Design & Construction, Michael Mann- Finance, Chris Low - City of San Ramon, Alex Lopez - Engineering Services, Alamo Glen, LLC RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and ADOPT the revised Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program for County Airports, AUTHORIZE and DIRECT the Public Works Director, or designee, to sign and submit the DBE Program for County Airports document to the Federal Aviation Administration for acceptance, and RESCIND the existing Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program approved by the Board of Supervisors on January 15, 2019, with regard to the Federal Aviation Administration. FISCAL IMPACT: Costs associated with the DBE Program for County Airports will be funded 100% by Federal Aviation Administration Funds. Without a DBE Program for County Airports, the County will not be eligible for federal funding for airport projects. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Beth Lee (925) 681-4200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 10 To:Board of Supervisors From:Keith Freitas, Airports Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and ADOPT the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program for County Airports BACKGROUND: On January 15, 2019, the Board of Supervisors approved the new DBE Program for the County Airports. However, since that time additional Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements have been incorporated into the DBE Program. Due to the number of changes, the County Airports are asking for the Board of Supervisors to approve and adopt the updated DBE Program. Upon Board approval of the attached DBE Program for the County Airports, the Public Works Department will submit the attached DBE Program for County Airports to the FAA for Acceptance. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Board does not take the recommended action, FAA may stop authorizing Federal funds for County Airport Projects. ATTACHMENTS Contra Costa DBE Program Contra Costa County 19'-21' Goal Methodology for DBE Program Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 1 of 47 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AIRPORTS DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) PROGRAM I. POLICY STATEMENT AND PROGRAM OBJECTIVES A. Policy Statement (§26.3; §26.7; §26.21; §26.23) The Contra Costa County Airports (hereinafter referred to as “County”) is a recipient of U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Federal Assistance funds through the Federal Aviation Administration and as a condition of receiving such assistance has developed this Policy and DBE Program in conformance with the federal Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program and its regulations published under U.S. DOT 49 CFR Part 26. The County will continue carrying out this Program until all funds from DOT have been expended. The County is committed to fulfilling the spirit and intent of the federal DBE Program and its regulations, by ensuring that DBEs have equitable access to participate in all federally funded County contracting opportunities. In accordance with these regulations the County’s policy is to ensure that minority-owned, women-owned, and other disadvantaged small businesses can fairly compete for and perform on contracts and subcontracts financed in whole, or in part with DOT funds. B. Program Objectives (§26.1; §26.23) It is the policy of the County to ensure that DBEs, as defined in Title 49 CFR, Part 26, have an equitable opportunity to compete for and participate in the County’s U.S. DOT-assisted contracts and subcontracts. The County is firmly committed to its DBE Program and the following policy objectives, which are designed to:  Ensure non-discrimination in the award and administration of all the County's DOT-assisted contracts and subcontracts;  Create a level playing field by which DBEs can compete fairly for and perform on the County 's DOT-assisted contracts;  Ensure the County’s DBE Program is narrowly tailored in accordance with applicable laws;  Ensure that only firms that fully meet 49 CFR Part 26 eligibility standards are permitted to participate as DBEs;  Assist in the removal, where feasible, of procurement and contracting barriers in DOT-assisted contracts which may inadvertently impede DBE participation; Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 2 of 47  Offer assistance to firms to enable them to compete successfully in the market place outside of the DBE Program;  Comply with federal regulations and financial assistance agreements;  Disseminate timely and accurate information regarding the County’s contracting opportunities to DBE Program participants and potential participants; and  Monitor and enforce contractor compliance with meeting established DBE goals and/or exercising Good Faith Efforts to do so as defined in 49 CFR 26. The County further ensures that implementation of its DBE Program is afforded the same priority as compliance with all other legal obligations incurred by the County in its financial assistance agreements with the U.S. DOT. It is the expectation of the County that all County personnel shall adhere to the full spirit and intent of the DBE Program, and carry out all DBE requirements and procedures accordingly. To oversee the Program, the County has designated the Public Works Director to serve as the County’s DBE Liaison Officer (DBELO). However, all of the County’s executives, management and staff share in the responsibility for making the County’s DBE Program success and shall give their full cooperation to the DBELO in the implementation of this Policy. Implementation of the DBE Program has the same priority as all other legal obligations incurred by the County as contained within its financial assistance agreement with the U.S. DOT. The County’s policy statement has been signed and dated by County’s Public Works Director as authorized by the Board of Supervisors and is to be disseminated throughout its organization and to the DBE and non-DBE business communities that perform work on the County’s U.S. DOT-assisted contracts through the County’s procurement solicitation process. Furthermore, this DBE Policy Statement is posted on the County’s website and made available to the general business community and the general public. Brian Balbas Date Public Works Director Contra Costa County C. Non-Discrimination (§26.7) The County will never exclude any person from participation in, deny any person the benefits of, or otherwise discriminate against anyone in connection with the award and performance of any contract governed by Title 49 CFR, Part 26 on the basis of race, color, sex, or national origin. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 3 of 47 In administering its DBE Program, the County will not, directly or through contractual or other arrangements, use criteria or methods of administration that have the effect of defeating or substantially impairing accomplishment of the objectives of the DBE Program with respect to individuals of a particular race, color, sex or national origin. II. DBE PROGRAM RACE AND GENDER NEUTRAL AND RACE CONSCIOUS IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES The County will utilize both race and gender neutral and race and gender conscious measures to meet its DBE Program goals and objectives. The County will implement these measures on their Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)-assisted contracting program based on results received from the County’s analysis of its past utilization data and an examination of similar market area Disparity Studies. Race Neutral Measures Pursuant to U.S. DOT, the County will work diligently to achieve the maximum feasible DBE participation through the implementation of race-neutral measures. These may include unbundling of contracts, providing contractor technical assistance, mentoring and establishing other business development programs, including training. In conjunction with these race neutral measures, the County will monitor contractor compliance, prompt payment, and retainage provisions in accordance with Title 49 CFR, Part 26. The County will also collect Bidders information and maintain a Bidder’s List Database to assist in accessing information about DBE availability for future goal setting purposes. The County will collect, and report race neutral DBE participation in accordance with the Uniform Report of DBE Commitments/Awards and Payments Form (refer to § 26.11). Race-Conscious Measures In accordance with the race conscious application, the County will conduct Pre-Award DBE Compliance Responsiveness Reviews of all FAA-assisted contracts with a contract-specific DBE goal to assess Bidders/Proposers compliance with the DBE good faith effort requirements and all other applicable DBE requirements of the solicitation prior to the award of the contract. Subsequent to the award, the County will continue to monitor and enforce contractor’s post award DBE compliance in accordance with the County’s DBE Program, including monitoring the respective contractor’s DBE commitments to ensure the commitments are attained by contract completion and that the DBE(s) committed are performing consistent with Commercially Useful Function standards. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 4 of 47 III. General Requirements A. Applicability (§26.3) The County, as a direct recipient of federal funds from the U.S. DOT, and as a condition of Federal financial assistance, is required to submit for approval, to the U.S. DOT Operating Administration from which it receives the majority of its funding, a DBE Program developed in accordance with federal regulations published under Title 49 CFR, Part 26 and subsequent Guidance. This Program sets forth the policies and procedures to be implemented by the County to ensure that DBEs have an equitable opportunity to participate in the County’s U.S. DOT-assisted contracting opportunities. In direct response to these regulatory requirements, the County hereby establishes a DBE Program, which will: 1. Ensure non-discrimination in the award and administration of County’s DOT-assisted contracts 2. Reaffirm the County’s commitment to fairness and the principles of equal opportunity. 3. Fulfill the spirit and intent of the Federal DBE Program regulations published under U.S. DOT Title 49 CFR, Part 26, by ensuring that DBEs have equitable access to participate in all of County’s DOT-assisted contracting opportunities. 4. Ensure that DBEs can fairly compete for and perform on all DOT-assisted contracts and subcontracts. 5. Meet legal standards for unique and narrow-tailoring requirements; 6. Ensure only firms that fully meet 49 CFR, Part 26 eligibility standards are permitted to participate as DBEs. 7. Help remove barriers to the participation of DBEs in DOT-assisted contracts. 8. Assist in the development of firms that can compete successfully in the marketplace outside the DBE Program. Contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of subcontracts. Any terms used in this section that are defined in 49 CFR Part 26, or elsewhere in the Regulations, shall have the meaning set forth in the Regulations. In the Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 5 of 47 event of any conflicts or inconsistencies between the Regulations and the County’s DBE Program with respect to DOT-assisted contracts, the Regulations shall prevail. In conformance with 49 CFR 26, the County will continue to carry out its DBE Program until all funds from U.S. DOT financial assistance have been expended. B. DBE Program Updates (§26.21) As a recipient of more than $250,000 of U.S. DOT financial assistance over a Federal Fiscal Year and pursuant to 49 CFR §26.21, the County shall continue to implement the DBE Program unless and until all funds from DOT financial assistance have been expended. The County will regularly review directives issued by DOT update its DBE Program as necessary to fully comply with the intent of the US DOT’s DBE Program. C. Definition of Terms (§26.5) Any terms used in this Program that are defined in 49 CFR Part 26 or elsewhere in the Regulations shall have the meaning set forth in the Regulations. Some of the most common terms are defined below: Affirmative Action: Positive activities undertaken by the County and its contractors to eliminate discrimination and effects of past discrimination and to ensure non-discriminatory practices in the future. Appeal: A formal filing by which a business entity challenges a legal decision made by a lower City and brings it to a higher City for review. Affiliation: has the same meaning the term has in the Small Business Administration (SBA) regulations, 13 CFR part 121. (1) Except as otherwise provided in 13 CFR part 121, concerns are affiliates of each other when, either directly or indirectly: (i) One concern controls or has the power to control the other; or (ii) A third party or parties controls or has the power to control both; or (iii) An identity of interest between or among parties exists such that affiliation may be found. (2) In determining whether affiliation exists, it is necessary to consider all appropriate factors, including common ownership, common management, and contractual relationships. Affiliates must be considered together in determining whether a concern meets small business size criteria and the statutory cap on the participation of firms in the DBE program. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 6 of 47 Alaska Native: A citizen of the United States who is a person of one-fourth degree or more Alaskan Indian (including Tsimshian Indians not enrolled in the Metlaktla Indian Community), Eskimo, or Aleut blood, or a combination of those bloodlines. The term includes, in the absence of proof of a minimum blood quantum, any citizen whom a Native village or Native group regards as an Alaska Native if their father or mother is regarded as an Alaska Native. Alaska Native Corporation (ANC): Any Regional Corporation, Village Corporation, Urban Corporation, or Group Corporation organized under the laws of the State of Alaska in accordance with the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, as amended (43 U.S.C. 1601, et seq.). Assets: All the property of a person available for paying debts or for distribution, including one's respective share of jointly held assets. This includes, but is not limited to, cash on hand and in banks, savings accounts, IRA or other retirement accounts, accounts receivable, life insurance, stocks and bonds, real estate, and personal property. Bidders List: A list of all contractors that have expressed an interest in bidding on prime and subcontracts on the County’s U.S. DOT-assisted projects. Business, business concern or business enterprise: An entity organized for profit with a place of business located in the United States, and which operates primarily within the United States or which makes a significant contribution to the United States economy through payment of taxes or use of American products, materials, or labor. California Unified Certification Program (CUCP): California’s one-stop certification clearinghouse which standardizes DBE certification criteria across all certifying members of the CUCP and enables applicants to apply once for DBE certification, which will be honored by all DOT recipients within California. Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): Codification of the general and permanent rules and regulations of the executive departments and agencies of the U.S. federal government. Commercially Useful Function: Work performed by a DBE that has a necessary and useful role in the contract scope of work and on which the firm’s role is not a superfluous step added in an attempt to obtain credit toward goals. If, in the County’s judgement, the firm (even though an eligible DBE) does not perform a commercially useful function in the transaction, the firm will not receive DBE credit. Compliance: Correct and accurate implementation of U.S. DOT DBE Program requirements. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 7 of 47 Contingent Liability: A liability that depends on the occurrence of a future and uncertain event. This includes, but is not limited to, guaranty for debts owed by the applicant concern, legal claims and judgments, and provisions for federal income tax. Contract: A legally binding relationship obligating a seller to furnish supplies or services (including, but not limited to construction and professional services) and the buyer to pay for them. For purposes of this part, a lease is considered to be a contract. Contracting Opportunity: Any decision by the County or its contractors to institute a procurement action to obtain a product or service commercially (as opposed to inter-governmental actions). Contractor: One who participates, through a prime or subcontract (at any tier), in a County contract. County Business Patterns (CBP): Statistical data authorized by United States Code Titles 13 and 26 and compiled by the U.S. Census Bureau, which provides annual details of geographic, industry, and other information for U.S. business establishments. Days: In computing any period of time described in this part, the day from which the period begins to run is not counted, and when the last day of the period is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, the period extends to the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday. Similarly, in circumstances where the recipient's offices are closed for all or part of the last day, the period extends to the next day on which the agency is open. DBE Directory: The California Unified Certification Program’s (CUCP’s) list of certified DBEs, which is used by the County and its contractors to identify potential DBE prime and subcontractors, suppliers, etc. DBE Liaison Officer (DBELO): A staff member of a public agency that receives U.S. DOT financial assistance, who is responsible for implementing all aspects of the agency’s DBE Program. De-certification: The result of the process initiated to remove a firm’s DBE eligibility. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE): A for-profit small business concern— 1. That is at least 51 percent owned by one or more individuals who are both socially and economically disadvantaged or, in the case of a corporation, in which 51 percent of the stock is owned by one or more such individuals; Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 8 of 47 2. Whose management and daily business operations are controlled by one or more of the socially and economically disadvantaged individuals who own it; and 3. Has been certified as Disadvantaged in accordance with Title 49 CFR, Part 26 by a certifying member agency of the CUCP. Disparity Study: Fact-based technique and methodology used to establish whether or not underutilization of certain groups, i.e., minorities and women, exists in the purchasing and contracting practices of an entity. A disparity study must be conducted in order to establish the legal validity of any affirmative action program in public contracting. Department or DOT: The U.S. Department of Transportation, including the Office of the Secretary, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). DOT-Assisted Contract: A contract between a recipient and a contractor (at any tier) funded in whole or in part with U.S. DOT financial assistance, including letters of credit or loan guarantees, except a contract solely for the purchase of land or improved real property. Federal Fiscal Year (FFY): The annual period beginning October 1st and ending September 30th of any given year. The FFY is different than the County’s fiscal year, which runs from July 1st through June 30th. Goal: A numerically expressed objective, which the County or its contractors are required to make good faith efforts to achieve. Good Cause: An acceptable reason for terminating a DBE subcontractor on a County contract. “Good cause” is defined as a situation where the DBE subcontractor has failed or refused to perform the work of its subcontract in accordance with normal industry standards. Good Faith Efforts (GFE): Efforts to achieve a DBE goal or other requirement of this Part, which, by their scope, intensity, and appropriateness to the objective, can reasonably be expected to fulfill the program requirement. Home State: The state in which a DBE firm or applicant for DBE certification maintains its principal place of business. Indian tribe: means any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community of Indians, including any ANC, which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians, or is recognized as such by the State in which the tribe, band, nation, group, or community resides. See definition of “tribally-owned concern” in this section. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 9 of 47 Joint Venture: An association between a DBE firm and one or more other firms to carry out a single, for profit business enterprise, for which the parties combine property, capital, efforts, skills and knowledge, and in which the DBE is responsible for a distinct, clearly defined portion of the work of the contract and whose share in the capital contribution, control, management, risks and profits of the joint venture are commensurate with its ownership interest. Liabilities: Financial or pecuniary obligations. This includes, but is not limited to, accounts payable, notes payable to bank or others, installment accounts, mortgages on real estate, and unpaid taxes. Manufacturer: A firm that operates or maintains a factory or establishment that produces, on the premises, the materials, supplies, articles, or equipment required under the contract and of the general character described by specifications. Memorandum of Agreement (MOA): A cooperative agreement written between parties to cooperatively work together on an agreed-upon project or meet an agreed-upon objective. An MOA can take the form of a legal document that is binding and holds the parties responsible to their commitment, or just a partnership agreement. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU): A document describing a bilateral agreement between parties. It expresses a convergence of will between the parties, indicating an intended common line of action, rather than a legal commitment. It is a more formal alternative to a gentlemen’s agreement, but generally lacks the binding power of a contract. Native Hawaiian: Any individual whose ancestors were natives, prior to 1778, of the area which now comprises the State of Hawaii. Native Hawaiian Organization: Any community service organization serving Native Hawaiians in the State of Hawaii which is a not-for-profit organization chartered by the State of Hawaii, is controlled by Native Hawaiians, and whose business activities will principally benefit such Native Hawaiians. Non-compliance: Failure, either willful or inadvertent, to correctly and accurately implement DBE Program requirements. Operating Administration: Any of the following agencies of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT): Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Personal Net Worth: The net values of the assets of an individual remaining after total liabilities are deducted. An individual’s personal net worth does not include: The individual’s ownership interest in an applicant or participative DBE firm or the individual’s equity in his or her primary place of residence. An individual’s personal net worth includes only his or her own share of assets, jointly or as community property, with the individual’s spouse. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 10 of 47 Primary industry classification: means the most current North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) designation which best describes the primary business of a firm. The NAICS is described in the North American Industry Classification Manual—United States, which is available on the Internet at the U.S. Census Bureau Web site: http://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/. Primary recipient: means a recipient which receives DOT financial assistance and passes some or all of it on to another recipient. Principal place of business: means the business location where the individuals who manage the firm's day-to-day operations spend most working hours. If the offices from which management is directed and where the business records are kept are in different locations, the recipient will determine the principal place of business. Program: Any undertaking on the County’s part to use U.S. DOT financial assistance as authorized by laws to which the DBE Program applies. Race-Conscious Measure or Program: A program or measure that focuses specifically on assisting DBEs, i.e., by the development and inclusion of participation goals or Good Faith Effort activities. Race-Neutral: A program or measure that focuses on assisting all small businesses equally, regardless of gender, ethnicity, or social/economic disadvantage, i.e., community outreach and awareness programs. For the purposes of this part, race-neutral includes gender-neutrality. Recipient: An entity, public or private, that receives U.S. DOT financial assistance (through the programs of the FAA, FHWA, or FTA), including primary recipient (an entity that passes some or all of the financial assistance to another recipient) and subrecipient (an entity that receives U.S. DOT financial assistance through a primary recipient). Regular Dealer/Supplier: A firm that owns, operates, or maintains a store, warehouse, or other establishment in which the materials, supplies, articles or equipment of the general character described by the specifications and required under the contract are bought, kept in stock, and regularly sold or leased to the public in the usual course of business. To be a regular dealer, the firm must be an established, regular business that engages, as its principal business and under its own name, in the purchase and sale or lease of the products in question. Any supplementing of regular dealers’ own distribution equipment shall be by a long-term lease agreement and not on an ad-hoc or contract by contract basis. Set-Aside: A contracting practice restricting eligibility for the competitive award of a contract solely to DBE firms or on some other basis not related to qualifications or pricing. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 11 of 47 Small Business Administration or SBA: The federal United States Small Business Administration. SBA certified: A firm refers to firms that have a current, valid certification from or recognized by the SBA under the 8(a) BD or SDB programs. Small Business Concern: A business that meets the definition contained in Section 3 of the Small Business Act and Small Business Administration regulations implementing it (13 CFR part 121) that also does not exceed the cap on average annual gross receipts specified in §26.65(b). Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Individual: Any individual who is a citizen (or lawfully admitted permanent resident) of the United States and who is— 1. Found by the CUCP certifying member agency to be socially and economically disadvantaged on a case-by-case basis. 2. A member of any one or more of the following groups, members of which are rebuttably presumed to be socially and economically disadvantaged: (i) “Black Americans” which includes persons having origins in any of the Black racial groups of Africa; (ii) “Hispanic Americans” which includes persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Dominican, Central or South American, or other Spanish or Portuguese culture or origin, regardless of race; (iii) “Native Americans” which includes persons who are American Indians, Eskimos, Aleuts, or Native Hawaiians; (iv) “Subcontinent Asian Americans” which includes persons whose origins are from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, the Maldives Islands, Nepal or Sri Lanka; (v) “Asian Pacific Americans” which includes persons whose origins are from Japan, China, Taiwan, Korea, Burma (Myanmar), Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia (Kampuchea), Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines, Brunei, Samoa, Guam, the U.S. Trust Territories of the Pacific Islands (Republic of Palau), the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands, Macao, Fiji, Tonga, Kiribati, Tuvalu, Nauru, Federated States of Micronesia, or Hong Kong. (vi) Women; and (vii) Any additional group whose members are designated as socially and economically disadvantaged by the SBA, at such time as the SBA designation becomes effective. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 12 of 47 3. Being born in a particular country does not, standing alone, mean that a person is necessarily a member of one of the groups listed in this definition. Transit Vehicle Manufacturer (TVM): A manufacturer of vehicles used by the County for the primary purpose of public mass transportation (e.g. railcars, buses, and vans). The term does not apply to firms that rehabilitate old vehicles or to manufacturers or dealers of transit vehicles with respect to requirement of paragraph 26.49 of the regulation. Tribally-owned Concern: Any concern at least 51 percent owned by an Indian tribe as defined in this section. Unified Certification Program (UCP): A one-stop certification clearinghouse which standardizes DBE certification criteria across all certifying members of the UCP and enables applicants to apply once for DBE certification, which will be honored by all DOT recipients within the state. U.S. Census Bureau: The U.S. government agency responsible for the U.S. Census, as well as other national demographic and economic data. U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT): Department of the U.S. federal government that is actively involved with U.S. transportation at the national, state, and local levels. The DOT includes the Office of the Secretary, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). IV. RESPONSIBILITIES FOR DBE PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION A. DBE Liaison Officer (§26.25) The County has designated the following individual as the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Liaison Officer (DBELO): Brian Balbas Public Works Director DBE Liaison Officer Contra Costa County Airports 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 Telephone: (925) 313-2000 Email: brian.balbas@pw.cccounty.us In this capacity, the DBELO is responsible for implementing all aspects of the County’s DBE Program and ensuring that the County complies with all provisions of Title 49 CFR, Part 26 and subsequent U.S. DOT-issued guidance. The DBELO has direct, independent access to the County Administrator Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 13 of 47 concerning DBE Program matters (Refer to Exhibit B, “DBE Program Organizational Chart”). The DBELO’s and/or designee’s duties include, but are not limited to, the following activities: 1. Analyze and revise DBE program policies and procedures as necessary. 2. Submit updates to the DOT, regarding any significant changes to the County’s DBE Program. 3. Works with the County’s departments and DBE consultant to perform goal-setting analysis, establish methodology, and calculate overall triennial DBE goals. 4. Facilitate public participation in the overall goal-setting process. 5. Conduct an annual review of the County’s overall DBE goal; adjust and/or re-calculate the goal as necessary and submit to the FAA. 6. Review triennial/overall DBE goal commitments at the end of each Federal Fiscal Year (FFY); analyze any goal shortfall(s); provide to the FAA (under the DBELO’s signature and within 90 days after FFY end), a written analysis of why the overall goal was not achieved, as well as a written plan for corrective actions that the County will take, to remedy the goal shortfall. 7. Analyze contract scope of work and subcontracting opportunities; assist in the calculation of DBE contract goals as applicable. 8. Conduct and coordinate outreach efforts to DBEs and small businesses to provide information regarding contracting opportunities with the County; utilize the assistance of minority and women business associations, small business development centers, industry/trade organizations, vendor fairs, workshops and minority-focused publications to assist with outreach efforts. 9. Coordinate public information and communication programs regarding contracting opportunities ensuring bid notices and requests for proposals are made available to DBEs in a timely manner. 10. Ensure that all solicitation documents and contract templates include all relevant DBE Program elements, contractor documentation submittal requirements and required contract provisions. 11. Work with the County’s contracting/procurement staff to arrange solicitations, present bid/ proposal requirements, and determine required quantities, specifications, and proposal delivery schedules to facilitate a level playing field for DBEs. 12. Work with the County’s contracting/procurement staff to remove, where feasible, barriers which may limit DBE participation, 13. Maintain a Bidders List of firms that submit a bid, quote or proposal for participation on a County contract; ensure that the Bidder List contains all information required by 49 CFR §26.11. 14. Evaluate Good Faith Efforts when bids/proposals do not meet DBE contract goals as applicable. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 14 of 47 15. Develop and implement technical assistance programs for DBEs, including resources and referrals to supportive services. 16. Investigate services and resources offered by banks and/or financial institutions owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. 17. Ensure that, prior to approval of the substitution of any DBE subcontractor, prime contractor’s evidence Good Faith Efforts to replace the original DBE with another eligible DBE. 18. Ensure that any DBE subcontractor terminations by the prime Contractor are for “good cause” only, and that any such terminations receive prior written approval by the County. 19. Monitor and enforce contractor compliance with all DBE Program provisions including goal commitments, documentation submittal requirements, reporting requirements, prompt payment to subcontractors, and DBE utilization requirements; impose administrative sanctions and/or monetary penalties for willful non-compliance. 20. Upon completion of each contract on which DBEs were utilized, prepare and file a written affidavit attesting to monitoring and verification of contractor compliance with all DBE Program provisions. 21. Maintain all necessary documentation to verify performance of activities included in the DBE Program. 22. Provide timely DBE reports to the FAA, including the annual Uniform Report of DBE Awards or Commitments and Payments. 23. Actively support and participate in the implementation of the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP). 24. Implement provisions to facilitate participation of small businesses on FAA-assisted contracts. B. DBE Program Staffing As support staff to the DBELO, Jerry Fahy, Transportation Engineering Division Manager, Kevin Emigh, Design/Construction Division Manager, and Keith Freitas, Director of Airports have been designated to provide direct support related to DBE matters. The support staff provides assistance to the County in administering its approved Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program in accordance with U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) DBE Program set forth under Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 26. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 15 of 47 C. DBE Organizational Chart D. Reconsideration Official (§26.53 (d)) In instances where contract goals are established and the bidder/proposer either fails to satisfy the requirements for meeting the contract goal or fails to document a sufficient Good Faith Effort (GFE) to do so, the County will afford the bidder/proposer, prior to award of the contract, an opportunity for administrative reconsideration of the County’s determination of non-responsiveness. Unless otherwise specified, the bidder/proposer may, within five (5) business days of being informed by the County of its non-responsiveness due to its failure to document and provide sufficient and adequate Good Faith Efforts in the subject procurement, request administrative reconsideration. Bidders/Proposers must make this request in writing to the Reconsideration Official as designated herein. To ensure integrity in the process, the Reconsideration Official will not have played any role in the original determination that the bidder/proposer did not meet the established contract-specific DBE goal, or adequately document Good Faith Efforts as specified in the subject procurement. The County has designated the following individuals to serve as DBE Reconsideration Officials: Adelina Huerta Samantha Fithian Public Works Department Reconsideration Official Contra Costa County Airports 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 Telephone: (925) 313-2000 Board of Supervisors Brian BalbasPublic Works Director Kevin EmighDesign/Construction Division Manager Jerry FahyTransportation Engineering Division Manager Keith FreitasDirector of Airports Natalie OlesenAdministrative Services Analyst II Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 16 of 47 As part of this reconsideration, the bidder/offeror will have the opportunity to provide written evidence/documentation or argument concerning the issue of whether it met the goal or made adequate Good Faith Efforts to do so. Further, the bidder/ proposer will have the opportunity to meet with the Reconsideration Official in person to discuss the issue of whether it met the goal or made adequate Good Faith Efforts to do so. The County will document the basis for the reconsideration determination and forward the final determination to the bidder/proposer within seven (7) working days of the hearing date. All parties shall be advised that reconsideration final decisions are NOT administratively appealable to U.S. DOT. Further, the County’s Reconsideration Official and/or designee shall also perform oversight of the reconsideration process. The Reconsideration Official and/or designee’s duties include, but are not limited to, the following activities: 1. Ensures that all DBE administrative reconsideration procedural actions are consistent with the requirements and standards specified in Title 49 CFR, Sections 26.53 and 26.87, and that the Program’s integrity is maintained at all times. 2. Reviews bidder/proposer written documentation or argument concerning the issue of whether it met the goal or made adequate Good Faith Efforts to do so. 3. Upon review of the bidder’s/proposer’s request for consideration, the Reconsideration Official sends the bidder/proposer a written decision on reconsideration, explaining the basis for finding that the bidder/proposer did or did not meet the goal or make adequate Good Faith Efforts to do so. 4. Maintains records of conducted hearings. 5. Provides determinations in writing to the City’s DBELO. V. ASSURANCES A. Federal Financial Assistance Agreement Assurance (§26.13 (a)) Pursuant to the requirements of this Part, the County will sign the following assurance as a condition of financial assistance agreements with the U.S. DOT, and which is hereby made applicable to all of the County’s U.S. DOT-assisted contracts: “The County shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any U.S. DOT-assisted contract or in the administration of its DBE Program or the requirements of Title 49 CFR, Part 26. The County shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under Title 49 CFR, Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 17 of 47 U.S. DOT-assisted contracts. The County’s DBE Program, as required by Title 49 CFR, Part 26 and as approved by U.S. DOT Operating Administrations, is incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of this Program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the County of its failure to carry out its approved Program, the Department may impose sanctions as provided under Title 49 CFR, Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.).” This language will appear in financial assistance agreements with sub-recipients. This language is to be used verbatim, as it is stated in 26.13(a). B. Contract Assurance Clause (§26.13 (b)) The County will ensure that the following clause is placed in all U.S. DOT-assisted contracts and subcontracts: “The contractor or subcontractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the performance of this contract. The contractor shall carry out applicable requirements of Title 49 CFR, Part 26 in the award and administration of the County’s U.S. DOT-assisted contracts. Failure by the contractor to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this contract, which may result in the termination of this contract or such other remedy as the County deems appropriate.” This language is to be used verbatim, as it is stated in 26.13(b). VI. ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. DBE Financial Institutions (§26.27) The County shall thoroughly investigate the full extent of services offered by banks and/or financial institutions owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged individuals in the community, to make reasonable efforts to utilize these institutions, as available, and to encourage prime contractors on the County’s U.S. DOT-assisted contracts to make use of these institutions. We have made the following efforts to identify and use such institutions. The County will also re-evaluate the availability of DBE financial institutions every 24 months. To date the County identified such institutions within an Attachment to this DBE Program. Information on the availability of such institutions can be obtained from the DBE Liaison Officer. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 18 of 47 B. DBE Directory (§26.31) The County is a non-certifying member of the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP). 49 CFR §26.81 requires each state’s UCP to maintain a unified DBE directory containing, for all firms certified by the UCP (including those from other states certified under the provisions of this part), the information required by §26.31. The County utilizes the CUCP online state-wide DBE Directory, which contains the following information for each certified DBE, as applicable: 1. DBE name 2. Contact name 3. Business address 4. County(ies) of performance 5. Telephone number 6. Fax number 7. Email address 8. NAICS code(s) under which the firm is certified 9. Work category code(s) (optional) 10. Contractor’s license classification 11. Gender 12. Ethnicity 13. Certification status (DBE or ACDBE) 14. Certifying agency This directory is made available to the public electronically on the California Department of Transportation’s (Caltrans) “Civil Rights” website, which can be accessed at www.dot.ca.gov/hq/bep. The electronic version is downloadable into a searchable and sortable Excel spreadsheet. The County refers prime bidders and proposers to the directory to locate available DBEs at their pre-proposal/bid conferences. C. Overconcentration (§26.33) The County will develop policies and procedures to address overconcentration of DBE utilization by work classification. This is to be accomplished through regular tracking of contract awards and through compliance monitoring efforts. The County will identify and directly respond to identified overconcentration of DBEs within specific trades or specialty areas and modify and/or exempt such areas from the Overall DBE Goal and contract-specific goal-setting process as necessary to ensure compliance with regulatory overconcentration provisions. Currently, the County has not identified any types of work that have a burdensome overconcentration of DBE participation. However, should the County determine that overconcentration exists in a work classification, the County will obtain the approval of the concerned U.S. DOT Operating Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 19 of 47 Administration of the identified overconcentration determination and the measures devised to address it. Once these measures are approved, they will become part of the County’s DBE Program. D. Business Development Programs (§26.35, Appendix C and Appendix D to 49 CFR 26) The County has not established a business development program. The County will re-evaluate the need for such a Program every year. If the County identifies that such a program is necessary to meet the objectives of the federal DOT DBE Program, to assist disadvantaged firms in enhancing their firms’ skills and abilities to successfully compete for contracts within their respective industries in the marketplace, it will extend all efforts to develop such a program. E. Small Business Element The U.S. DOT final rule issued on January 28, 2011 added §26.39 to 49 CFR Part 26. This section required recipients (local agencies) of U.S. DOT financial assistance to include an element in their contracting requirements, to facilitate competition by small businesses. The County has established a Small Business Element as a supplement to their existing DBE Program, to facilitate competition by small business concerns, taking all reasonable steps to eliminate obstacles to their participation, including unnecessary and unjustified bundling of contract requirements that may preclude small business participation in procurements as prime contractors or subcontractors in direct response to regulatory requirements, 49 CFR Part 26.39 “Fostering Small Business Participation” (Federal Register/ Vol. 76, No. 19/ Friday, January 28, 2011/ Rules and Regulations). For purposes of capturing Small Business utilization, the County adheres to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Small Business definition for what constitutes a Small Business Enterprise. This Small Business Element will include, but is not limited to the following assertive strategies: 1. The County will conduct a Pre-Proposal/Bid Conference which will allow Small Business Enterprises the opportunity to network, access resources, and team/partner with the County. 2. The County will advertise on its website with local stakeholders and/or through general/industry publications The County will actively implement the Small Business elements to foster and promote small business participation in the County’s federally-assisted contracting program. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 20 of 47 VII. DETERMINING, MEETING AND COUNTING DBE PARTICIPATION TOWARDS THE OVERALL DBE GOAL (§26.45; §26.51; §26.55) A. Methodology for Setting Overall DBE Goals (§26.45; §26.49) The County will establish an overall DBE goal covering a three-year federal fiscal year period if the County anticipates awarding DOT/FAA funded prime contracts for a cumulative total value of which exceeds $250,000 during any one or more of the reporting fiscal years within the three-year goal period. In accordance with Section 26.45(f) the County will submit its overall goal to FAA on August 1 of each three-year goal period. The County’s current goal covers the goal period of Federal Fiscal Years 2019-21 and the County is projected to submit its next overall goal on August 1, 2021. A description of the methodology utilized to calculate the overall goal submitted for FFYs 2019/21 and the goal calculations can be found on the County’s website. The following delineates the federally prescribed goal-setting methodology (Step 1 and Step 2) and other required components the County will follow in establishing an Overall DBE goal, as follows: 1. Projecting Federal Assisted Contract Expenditures for Three Fiscal Year Period In conjunction with the preparation and adoption of the budget for each fiscal year, the DBELO, in consultation with the appropriate divisions and departments responsible for contracting activities, will conduct a thorough analysis of the projected number, types of work and dollar amounts of contracting opportunities that will be funded, in whole or in part, by U.S. DOT federal financial assistance for the upcoming three year fiscal period. 2. Establishing a Base Figure After the County defines its U.S. DOT-assisted contracting program and corresponding market area for a given federal fiscal year, the County will establish a Base Figure (Step 1) of ready, willing, and able DBEs in contrast to all firms available to participate in the County’s U.S. DOT-assisted contracts, in accordance with Title 49 CFR, Part 26.45 provisions. The County may survey the relative availability of DBEs to establish its Base Figure utilizing any one of the following:  The most readily available data, which may include the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP) DBE Database and other certifying Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 21 of 47 agencies’ databases, to assess the number of ready, willing and able DBEs, and the U.S. Census Bureau’s County Business Patterns (CBP) database to determine the corresponding number of all firms available to bid on the County’s contracting opportunities by work classification.  The County’s Bidders List (When using this approach, you must establish a mechanism (documented in your goal submission) to directly capture data on DBE and non-DBE prime and sub contractors that submitted bid or quotes on your DOT-assisted contracts).  Data from disparity studies, as available.  Another U.S. DOT-recipient’s DBE Goal in the same or substantially similar market.  Alternative methods based on demonstratable evidence of local market conditions designed to ultimately attain a goal that is rationally related to the relative availability of DBEs in the County’s market area. The exclusive use of a list of prequalified contractors or plan holders, or a bidders list that does not comply with the requirements of subparagraph (2), is not an acceptable alternative means of determining the availability of DBEs. To determine the relative availability of DBEs, the County will divide the numerator representing the ratio of ready, willing and able DBE firms within its defined market area by the denominator representing all firms (DBEs and non-DBEs) available by each work category within the defined market area. Application of this formula will yield the following baseline information: Number of Ready, Willing and Able DBEs = BASE FIGURE Number of All Available Firms (Including DBEs and non-DBEs) The Base Figure will be adjusted by weighting the relative availability of DBEs grouped within the major work categories, giving more weight to the work categories in which the County projects to spend more U.S. DOT-assisted dollars. 3. Adjusting the Base Figure Upon establishing the Base Figure, the County will review and assess other known evidence potentially impacting the relative availability of DBEs within the County’s market area, in accordance with prescribed narrow tailoring provisions set forth under 49 CFR Part 26.45, which may include, but is not limited to: Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 22 of 47  Demonstrated evidence of DBE capacity to perform work in the County’s U.S. DOT-assisted contracting program.  Real market conditions.  Disparity studies conducted within the County’s jurisdiction to the extent that they are not already accounted for in the Step 1 Base Figure; and  Other relevant factors may include: i. Other recipients’ goal results in similar contracting opportunities and markets, and the reasons for the level of those results. ii. The methods used by the County to increase DBE participation in federally assisted contracts. iii. The demographics and business activity of the market area in which the County will solicit bids and/or proposals. iv. The ability of DBEs to obtain financing, bonding, and insurance requirements to participate in the County’s DBE Program. v. The data from studies of employment and self-employment, education, training and union apprenticeship programs, to the extent that the County can relate it to the opportunities for DBEs to perform in the County’s DBE Program. In accordance with 49 CFR 26.45, the County’s overall DBE goals will be expressed as a percentage of all Federal-aid funds the County will expend in U.S. DOT-assisted contracts in the forthcoming fiscal years. If the evidence does not suggest an adjustment is necessary, then no adjustment shall be made. 4. Public Participation and Outreach Efforts (§26.45; §26.51) i. Publication of Proposed Overall Goals Pursuant to new DBE Program regulations effective November 3, 2014, the County understands that commercial advertising of the overall DBE goal is now at the County’s discretion. The County will post a public notice to the County’s website announcing the County’s proposed Overall Goal. If the County commercially advertises its proposed triennial goal, the public notice shall include the following: i. Proposed triennial goal percentage for DBE participation ii. A statement that the proposed goal and methodology are available for public inspection for a period of 30 days from the date of publication. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 23 of 47 iii. A statement that the County will accept public comments on the proposed goal and methodology for a period of 30 days from the date of publication. iv. Contact information and instructions for viewing the County’s goal/methodology and/or submitting a public comment. Upon receipt of any public comments, the County’s DBELO will analyze the comments, summarize the results, and modify the overall goal, if appropriate. This will occur prior to final adoption of the triennial goal by County’s Board of Directors and submission to FAA for review. ii. Expressing Overall Goal 26.45(e) Once the County has determined a percentage figure in accordance with Step One and Step Two of the federally prescribed goal-setting methodology, the overall goal should be expressed as a percentage of all FAA funds (exclusive of FAFA funds to be used for the purchase of transit vehicles) that you will expend in FAA-assisted contracts in the three forthcoming fiscal years. iii. Outreach and DBE Program Public Consultation 26.45(g) Prior to publication of the County’s proposed overall DBE goal, the County will consult with, and solicit input from, a variety of constituent groups representing minority- and women-owned business organizations, contractor organizations, and other industry, ethnic and community-based organizations reasonably expected to possess information regarding the availability of disadvantaged businesses, their capability to perform on County contracts, and the impacts and effects of contracting discrimination on DBEs. Upon receipt of any comments, the County’s DBELO will analyze the comments, summarize the results, and modify the proposed overall goal, if appropriate. iv. Annual Review and Remedy Reports (49 CFR §26.47) Pursuant to 49 CFR §26.47(c), the County is required to analyze, on an annual basis, the DBE awards and commitments reported to the FAA. If the County’s DBE awards/commitments are less than the County’s overall DBE goal for that Federal Fiscal Year (FFY), the County is required to develop a written analysis of the Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 24 of 47 shortfall, as well as stablish specific steps and milestones to correct the problems identified in the analysis. The County will submit their written analysis to their FAA Civil Rights Regional Office within 90 day of the FFY end, or by the end of the calendar year. v. Transit Vehicle Manufacturers (§26.49) The County shall require all Transit Vehicle Manufacturers (TVMs) to certify that they have complied with 49 CFR §26.49 and have established an overall DBE participation goal that has been approved (or not disapproved) by the FAA before they can bid on any County transit vehicle procurement. B. Race-Neutral Measures (§26.51) The County intends to use race and gender-neutral methods to the maximum extent feasible to achieve its overall DBE goal. DBE participation that is obtained on contracts that have no established DBE contract goal, or where prime contractors use a strictly competitive bidding process and do not consider the DBE’s status as a factor in awarding a subcontract shall be considered race and gender-neutral DBE participation. In addition, the County will include small and disadvantaged businesses in their outreach, public information, and communications programs, to ensure that DBEs are made aware of Contra Costa’s contracting opportunities C. Race-Conscious Measures In accordance with 49 CFR Part 26, the County will project how much of the overall DBE goal can be achieved through race and gender-neutral measures, and will use race-conscious measures, such as contract-specific DBE goals, only to meet that portion of the overall goal which is not likely to be met utilizing race-neutral measures. Further, the County shall monitor and adjust the estimated utilization of race-neutral and race-conscious methods as required in accordance with 49 CFR 26.51(f). D. Methodology for Setting Contract-Specific Goals (§26.51 The DBELO shall establish a contract-specific DBE participation goal to meet any portion of the overall goal the County does not project being able to meet by utilizing race-neutral means, as applicable based on funding directives. The DBELO will receive from the Public Works department an advance notification form from each upcoming contract, with cost estimates, scope of work, and Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 25 of 47 possible subcontracting opportunities from the Public Works Department. Contract goals are established over the period to which the overall goal applies and will cumulatively result in meeting any portion of the County’s overall goal that is not projected to be met through the use of race-neutral means. The County will establish contract-specific goals only on those DOT-assisted contracts for which subcontracting possibilities have been identified with corresponding availability of DBEs. The County will not establish a contract-specific goal on every DOT-assisted contract; consideration and individual assessment will be conducted specific to the County’s overall goal attainment status to determine if warranted. Further, contract-specific goals may be adapted to the circumstances of each contract (e.g. type and location of work, subcontracting opportunities, and availability of DBEs to perform) and will be expressed as a percentage of the total contract value. E. Evaluation and Award of Contracts with DBE Contract Goals (§26.53(a)) In cases where a contract goal has been established, the contract in question will only be awarded to a bidder/offeror that has made good faith efforts to meet the contract goal. The County shall award contracts to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder as required by California Public Contract Code, where applicable. However, for such contracts, as well as for contracts awarded pursuant to a competitive negotiation procedure, a bidder/proposer that 1) fails to demonstrate its commitment to meet the established DBE contract goal by listing sufficient DBEs on its “DBE Participation Listing” form due with the bid/proposal or within 48 hours after bids/proposals are due AND/OR 2) fails to demonstrate that it made an adequate Good Faith Effort to meet the goal, shall be deemed “non-responsive” and shall be ineligible for contract award. i. Evaluation of Bids or Proposals for Contracts with Established Contract-Specific Goals (§26.53 (b)) The DBELO or designee shall review all related DBE information for completeness and accuracy, and the DBELO shall evaluate the three (3) apparent lowest bids and/or the highest three (3) ranked proposals to determine whether the Bidders/Offerors submitted all of the DBE-related information required by the solicitation, including evaluating their respective DBE goal commitments and Good Faith Efforts documentation as necessary to determine responsiveness in meeting the DBE requirements of the solicitation. Additionally, the Bidder’s/Offeror’s DBE goal commitments and/or Good Faith Efforts documentation shall be evaluated by the DBELO to determine responsiveness to the DBE requirements set forth in the solicitation and/or contract. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 26 of 47 ii. Evaluation of DBE Eligibility Status for Contracts with Established Contract-Specific Goals The County requires that the DBEs listed by Bidders/Offerors for participation in a contract with goals be certified as an eligible DBE at the time of bid/proposal submission in order for their participation to be counted towards meeting the established contract-specific DBE goal. The DBELO will assess eligibility for crediting as a part of the evaluation process utilizing the CUCP DBE Database and/or other valid proof of DBE certification. iii. Pre-Award DBE Responsiveness Evaluation for Contracts with Established Contract-Specific Goals Following the determination of the Bidder’s/Offeror’s responsiveness and responsibility to DBE requirements set forth in the solicitation, the DBELO shall prepare a report relative to contract-specific DBE requirements, to be submitted for presentation to the Board of Directors at the time the contract award is considered. iv. Bidder’s/Offeror’s Right to Administrative Reconsideration In the event the DBELO determines that the apparent successful Bidder/Offeror has not met the contract-specific goal and has not demonstrated adequate Good Faith Efforts to do so, the DBELO will notify the bidder/offeror in writing. The notification shall include the reasons for the determination and that the bidder/offeror has the right to submit written documentation or appear before the Reconsideration Official or designee for reconsideration prior to the time that a recommendation for award of contract is presented to the Board of Directors. The Reconsideration Official or designee shall provide the bidder/offeror with a written decision on reconsideration, including the basis for the determination. In the event that the Reconsideration Official or designee determines that the said bidder/offeror has not met the contract–specific DBE goal nor demonstrated adequate Good Faith Efforts to do so, the bidder/offeror will no longer be eligible to be considered for that particular contract award. The result of the reconsideration process is not administratively appealable to the U.S. Department of Transportation (Refer to Section V.B: “Reconsideration Official”). Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 27 of 47 1. Guidance Concerning Good Faith Efforts in Meeting Established Contract-Specific DBE Goals (§26.53; Appendix A to 49 CFR 26) If a contract-specific DBE goal has been established by the County for a given DOT-assisted contract, a Bidder/Offeror must, in order to be responsible and/or responsive to the solicitation and/or contract requirements, make good faith efforts to meet the goal. A Bidder/Offeror can meet this requirement in either of two ways. First, a Bidder/Offeror can meet the goal by documenting commitments for participation by DBE firms sufficient to meet the established contract-specific DBE goal. Second, if a Bidder/Offeror does not meet the contract-specific DBE goal, the Bidder/Offeror can document adequate good faith efforts undertaken to do so to demonstrate that the Bidder/Offeror took all necessary and reasonable steps to achieve the DBE goal or other requirement of this part which, by their scope, intensity, and appropriateness to the objective, could reasonably be expected to obtain sufficient DBE participation, even if the Bidder/Offeror was not fully successful in obtaining such. The following sections outline the requirements firms competing for County contracts shall comply with to demonstrate responsiveness in either meeting the goal, documenting commitments for participation by DBE firms sufficient for this purpose, or documenting adequate Good Faith Efforts to do so. Failure of a Bidder/Offeror to meet the established contract-specific DBE goal, or failure to demonstrate that sufficient Good Faith Efforts were undertaken, will deem the respective Bidder/Offeror as non-responsive. i. Meeting Established Contract-Specific DBE Goals If the County establishes a contract-specific DBE goal for a given contract, the County must only award such contract to a Bidder/Offeror that meets the goal or makes good faith efforts to meet it. As such, a Bidder/Offeror is required to submit the following DBE information to the County within the prescribed timeline ( with the bid or proposal or within 48 hours after bids/proposals are due) set forth in each solicitation to enable the County to assess a Bidder’s/Offeror’s responsiveness to contract-specific DBE participation goal requirements: a. Name, address and contact information for each DBE listed on the contract; b. Description of the work that each DBE will perform; c. Dollar amount of participation of each DBE; d. Percentage of total contract value allocated to each DBE; Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 28 of 47 e. Prime bidder’s/proposer’s name, title and contact information; f. The County’s contract number; g. Total dollar amount of participation of all DBEs; h. Percentage of total contract value allocated to all DBEs; i. DBE commitment percentage; j. Prime bidder’s/proposer’s signature and date k. For each listed DBE, proof of valid and current DBE certification in the NAICS code directly applicable to the work the DBE will perform on the contract. If partial or no DBE participation has been attained, evidence of Good Faith Efforts must be submitted (Refer to Section VII. D. 2: “Guidance Concerning Good Faith Efforts in Meeting Established Contract-Specific DBE Goals” and Appendix A to Title 49 CFR, Part 26). The documentation of Good Faith Efforts must include copies of each DBE and non-DBE subcontractor quote submitted to the bidder when a non-DBE subcontractor was selected over a DBE for work on the contract. Any DBE participation in excess of the established contract-specific DBE goal shall be monitored and tracked as race-neutral DBE participation. ii. Documenting Adequate Good Faith Efforts to Meet Contract- Specific DBE Goals (§26.53) The County will require Bidders/Offerors to comply with Good Faith Efforts requirements, as a matter of responsiveness. The obligation of the bidder/offeror is to undertake and document Good Faith Efforts towards meeting the established contract-specific DBE goal. In the event the Bidder’s/Offeror’s efforts to meet the established goal result in partial or no DBE participation, all Bidders/Offerors must document adequate Good Faith Efforts documentation (which were undertaken prior to bid submittal or proposal submission due date and timeline) and submit such, unless otherwise specified, in the solicitation to the County with their bid or proposal or within 48 hours after bids/proposals are due. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 29 of 47 Mere pro forma efforts are not Good Faith efforts to meet DBE goal requirements. The County will make a fair and reasonable judgment whether a Bidder/Offeror that did not meet the established contract-specific DBE goal made adequate Good Faith Efforts to do so. Only those efforts made prior to the bid/proposal submittal due date will be considered in the evaluation of the Bidder’s/Offeror’s Good Faith Efforts. If a firm does not propose to meet a contract-specific goal and fails to submit the required Good Faith Efforts documentation with the bid/proposal or within 48 hours after bids/proposals are due, that will be grounds for finding the bid/proposal to be non-responsive. The DBELO or designee will be responsible for determining whether a Bidder/Offeror who has not met the established contract DBE goal has documented sufficient Good Faith Efforts to be deemed responsive. Bidder/Offeror must demonstrate real and substantive good faith efforts. The Bidder/Offeror must have undertaken all necessary and reasonable steps to achieve a DBE goal that by their scope, intensity, and appropriateness to the objective could reasonably be expected to obtain sufficient DBE participation. The County will consider the quality, quantity, and intensity of the different kinds of efforts. F. Use of Set-Asides or Quotas (§26.43) The County shall not permit the use of quotas for DBEs on U.S. DOT-assisted contracts in accordance with Title 49 CFR, Part 26.43. Further, the County shall not set aside contracts for DBEs on U.S. DOT-assisted contracts subject to the regulatory provisions, except in limited and extreme circumstances where no other method could be reasonably expected to redress egregious instances of discrimination. G. Counting DBE Participation (§26.55) The County will count DBE participation toward overall and contract-specific goals as provided in the solicitation and contract specifications for the prime contractor, subcontractor, joint venture partner, or vendor of material or supplies. The County requires that all DBEs listed by bidders/proposers for participation in contracts with goals, be certified as eligible DBEs at the time of bid/proposal submission, in order for their participation to be counted towards meeting the established DBE contract goal and/or the County’s overall DBE goal. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 30 of 47 The following guidelines apply in calculating eligible DBE participation toward meeting established contract-specific DBE goals and the County’s overall DBE goal in accordance with Title 49 CFR, Part 26.55: 1. Only work proposed to be performed by a DBEs own work forces (including cost of supplies, materials, and equipment leases) obtained by the DBE for the work of the contract, except supplies and equipment the subcontractor purchases and/or leases from the prime contractor or its affiliate, can be counted toward DBE goals. 2. When a DBE subcontracts part of the work of its contract to another firm, the value of the subcontracted work may be counted towards DBE goals only if the lower tier subcontractor is itself a certified DBE and performs the work with their own work force. Work that a DBE subcontracts to a non-DBE firm does not count towards DBE goals. 3. In instances of a joint venture, a bidder/offeror may only count, toward the DBE goal, the portion of the work proposed to be performed by the certified DBE partnering firm that meets certification, ownership, and control standards. 4. A bidder/offeror may count, towards its DBE goal, only expenditures to firms that are proposed to perform a commercially useful function on that contract. A DBE performs a commercially useful function when it is responsible for execution of the work of the contract and is carrying out its responsibilities by actually performing, managing, and supervising the work involved. If a DBE does not perform or exercise responsibility for at least 30 percent (30%) of the total cost of its contract with its own work force, or the DBE subcontracts a greater portion of the work of a contract than would be expected on the basis of normal industry practice for the type of work involved, the DBE is presumed not to be performing a commercially useful function. When a DBE is presumed to not be performing a commercially useful function, the DBE may present evidence to rebut this presumption. The County’s decisions on commercially useful function matters are subject to review by the concerned Operating Administration but are not administratively appealable to the U.S. DOT. 5. A bidder/offeror may count, toward its DBE goal, 60 percent (60%) of its expenditures for materials and supplies required under the contract and obtained from a DBE Regular Dealer and, a bidder/offeror may count 100 percent (100%) of such expenditures obtained from a DBE Manufacturer. For purposes of this section, a Manufacturer is a firm that operates or maintains a factory or establishment that produces, on the premises, the materials and supplies obtained by the contractor. A Regular Dealer is a firm that owns, operates, or maintains a store, warehouse, or other Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 31 of 47 establishment in which the materials or supplies required for performance of the contract are bought, kept in stock, and regularly sold to the public in the usual course of business. 6. A bidder/offeror may count, toward its DBE goal, fees and commissions paid to DBE firms performing in the capacity of a Broker, provided that the fees or commissions are determined by the County to be reasonable and not excessive when compared with fees customarily allowed for similar services. 7. Special Provisions for DBE Trucking Firms - A bidder/offeror may count, toward the DBE goal, all transportation services provided by DBE trucking firms who can demonstrate control of trucking operations for which it seeks credit and which it owns, insures, and operates, using drivers it employs, in the performance of the contract. The DBE must itself own and operate at least one, fully licensed, insured, and operational truck used on the contract. 8. The DBE trucking firm may lease trucks from another DBE firm, including an owner-operator who is certified as a DBE. The DBE who leases trucks from another DBE receives credit for the total value of the transportation services the lessee DBE provides on the contract. The DBE may also lease trucks from a non-DBE firm, including from an owner-operator. The DBE that leases trucks equipped with drivers from a non-DBE is entitled to credit for the total value of transportation services provided by non-DBE leased trucks equipped with drivers not to exceed the value of transportation services on the contract provided by DBE-owned trucks or leased trucks with DBE employee drivers. Additional participation by non-DBE owned trucks equipped with drivers receives credit only for the fee or commission it receives as a result of the lease arrangement. If a recipient chooses this approach, it must obtain written consent from the appropriate DOT operating administration. 9. The DBE may lease trucks without drivers from a non-DBE truck leasing company. If the DBE leases trucks from a non-DBE truck leasing company and uses its own employees as drivers, it is entitled to credit for the total value of these hauling services. 10. In cases where DBE certification has lapsed or has been terminated during the performance period of the contract, the prime contractor is eligible to continue to report the dollar value of the work performed by the affected DBE firm to the County on the “Monthly DBE Subcontractors Paid Report Summary and Payment Verification” (Form 103). The County will not credit the DBE participation towards its overall agency DBE goal. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 32 of 47 11. The County will not credit the participation of DBE subcontractors toward a contractor’s DBE goal obligation until the amount has actually been paid to the DBE. The County will count expenditures with DBEs for materials or supplies toward DBE goals as provided in the following: (1)(i) If the materials or supplies are obtained from a DBE manufacturer, count 100 percent of the cost of the materials or supplies toward DBE goals. (ii) For purposes of this paragraph (e)(1), a manufacturer is a firm that operates or maintains a factory or establishment that produces, on the premises, the materials, supplies, articles, or equipment required under the contract and of the general character described by the specifications. (2)(i) If the materials or supplies are purchased from a DBE regular dealer, count 60 percent of the cost of the materials or supplies toward DBE goals. (ii) For purposes of this section, a regular dealer is a firm that owns, operates, or maintains a store, warehouse, or other establishment in which the materials, supplies, articles or equipment of the general character described by the specifications and required under the contract are bought, kept in stock, and regularly sold or leased to the public in the usual course of business. (A) To be a regular dealer, the firm must be an established, regular business that engages, as its principal business and under its own name, in the purchase and sale or lease of the products in question. (B) A person may be a regular dealer in such bulk items as petroleum products, steel, cement, gravel, stone, or asphalt without owning, operating, or maintaining a place of business as provided in this paragraph (e)(2)(ii) if the person both owns and operates distribution equipment for the products. Any supplementing of regular dealers' own distribution equipment shall be by a long-term lease agreement and not on an ad hoc or contract-by-contract basis. (C) Packagers, brokers, manufacturers' representatives, or other persons who arrange or expedite transactions are not regular dealers within the meaning of this paragraph (e)(2). Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 33 of 47 (3) With respect to materials or supplies purchased from a DBE which is neither a manufacturer nor a regular dealer, count the entire amount of fees or commissions charged for assistance in the procurement of the materials and supplies, or fees or transportation charges for the delivery of materials or supplies required on a job site, toward DBE goals, provided you determine the fees to be reasonable and not excessive as compared with fees customarily allowed for similar services. Do not count any portion of the cost of the materials and supplies themselves toward DBE goals, however. (4) You must determine the amount of credit awarded to a firm for the provisions of materials and supplies (e.g., whether a firm is acting as a regular dealer or a transaction expediter) on a contract-by-contract basis. H. Commercially Useful Function Standards (§26.55) The County will count expenditures to a DBE contractor/consultant toward the DBE goals only if the DBE is performing a commercially useful function on that contract: 1. A DBE performs a commercially useful function when it is responsible for execution of the work of its contract and when it is carrying out its responsibilities by actually performing, managing, and supervising the work involved. To perform a commercially useful function, the DBE must also be responsible, with respect to materials and supplies used on the contract, for negotiating price, determining quality and quantity, ordering the material, installing the material (where applicable), and paying for the material itself. To determine whether a DBE is performing a commercially useful function, the County will evaluate the amount of work subcontracted, industry practices, whether the amount the firm is to be paid under the contract commensurates with the work it is actually performing, the DBE credit claimed for its performance of the work, and other relevant factors. 2. A DBE does not perform a commercially useful function if its role is limited to that of an extra participant in a transaction, contract, or project through which funds are passed in order to obtain the appearance of DBE participation. In determining whether a DBE is such an extra participant, the County may examine similar transactions, particularly those in which DBEs do not participate. 3. If a DBE does not perform or exercise responsibility for at least thirty percent (30%) of the total cost of its contract with its own work force or, if the DBE subcontracts a greater portion of the work of a contract than would be expected on the basis of normal industry practice for the type of work involved, one must presume that it is not performing a commercially useful function. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 34 of 47 4. When a DBE is presumed not to be performing a commercially useful function as provided in the previous bullet, the DBE may present evidence to rebut this presumption. The County will determine that the firm is performing a commercially useful function given the type of work involved and normal industry practices. 5. The County’s decisions on commercially useful function matters are subject to review by the U.S. DOT Operating Administration. During the course of the contract containing a DBE goal, the County or an agent of the County may conduct on-site monitoring interview/observation to ensure that work committed to DBEs is actually being performed by DBEs in the same capacity as the DBE participation being reported. This monitoring effort is fully incorporated into the County’s DBE On-site Compliance field observation process. This observed work will be reconciled against the DBE subcontractor agreement(s) and Prime Contractor Form 103. VIII. REQUIRED CONTRACT PROVISIONS AND ENFORCEMENT A. Prompt Payment Provisions (§26.29) 1. Prompt Progress Payments to Subcontractors The County requires that all subcontractors performing work on DOT-assisted contracts shall be promptly paid for work performed pursuant to their agreements, in accordance with all relevant federal, state, and local law. This provision requires a contractor to issue payment to all subcontractors (DBEs and non-DBEs), for satisfactory performance of their contracts, no later than seven (7) calendar days from receipt of each payment made to the contractor by the County. 2. Payment of Retention Withheld from Subcontractor In addition to the prompt progress payment requirement set forth above, the County ensures prompt and full payment of retainage from the prime contractor to the subcontractor within 30 days after the subcontractor's work is satisfactorily completed. Pursuant to §26.29, the County, at its discretion, may elect to utilize one of the following methods to comply with the prompt payment of retainage requirement: 1. Decline to hold retainage from prime contractors and prohibit prime contractors from holding retainage from subcontractors. 2. Decline to hold retainage from the prime contractors and require a contract clause obligating prime contractors to make prompt and full payment of any Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 35 of 47 retainage kept by the prime contractor to the subcontractor within thirty (30) days after the subcontractor’s work is satisfactorily completed. 3. Hold retainage from prime contractors and provide for prompt and regular incremental acceptances of portions of the prime contract, pay retainage to prime contractors based on these acceptances, and require a contract clause obligating the prime contractor to pay all retainage owed to the subcontractor for satisfactory completion of the accepted work within thirty (30) days after payment to the prime contractor. Any delay or postponement of payment from the above-referenced timeframes may occur only for good cause following written approval from the County. Failure to comply with this provision without prior approval from the County will constitute noncompliance, which may result in the application of appropriate administrative sanctions, including, but not limited to, a penalty of two percent (2%) of the invoice amount due per month, for every month that full payment is not made. These prompt payment provisions must be incorporated in all subcontract agreements issued by the contractor. B. Post-Award Contractor Reporting Requirements (§26.55) 1. Notification of Reporting Responsibilities Prior to execution of all U.S. DOT-assisted contracts, which are subject to DBE Program provisions, the prime contractor shall be directed to the contract specification for the County’s specific DBE reporting and recordkeeping requirements. 2. Copies of DBE Subcontracts In accordance with 49 CFR 26.53 (j) contractors and subcontractors of all tiers must make copies of all DBE subcontracts available to the County. If the DBE subcontract is not received, the County will not process the contractor’s and subcontractor’s invoice for payment. The subcontractor shall ensure that all subcontracts or an agreement with DBEs to supply labor or materials require that the subcontract and all lower tier subcontractors be performed in accordance with this part's provisions. 3. DBE Activity Reporting Forms All prime contractors/consultants shall submit monthly progress reports on DBE utilization to the County on Form 103: “Monthly DBE Subcontractors Paid Report Summary and Payment Verification” (Refer to Exhibits G and H) when each invoice is submitted. The County will keep a running tally of actual payments to DBE firms for work committed to DBEs at the time of Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 36 of 47 contract award and subsequent to award. The County’s Summary of Subcontractors Paid Report (Form 103) is used to keep a running tally. Failure to submit these reports in a timely manner shall result in the delay of processing the prime contractors’/consultants’ invoice for payment. The FORM 103, “Monthly DBE Subcontractors Paid Report Summary and Payment Verification”, includes the following information: a. Name of each DBE Subcontractor. b. General work assignment of each DBE Subcontractor. c. The specific portion of work executed by each DBE Subcontractor during the reporting period. d. The dollars committed to each DBE Subcontractor. e. The dollars paid to each DBE Subcontractor during the reporting period. f. The dollars paid to date for each DBE Subcontractor. g. The dollars paid to the DBE as a result of a change order or other cost modification. h. The dollars paid to date as a percentage of the total commitment to each DBE. i. Date of last progress payment j. Invoice amount & Invoice Date k. Invoice number corresponding to last payment to subcontractor l. Prime Contractor Signature under penalty of perjury that it has complied with all requirements of 49 CFR, Part 26 and prompt payment requirements of the California Public Contract Code. 4. Contractor Good Faith Efforts and Reporting Obligations for Contracts with DBE Participation Goals During the term of the contract, the contractor shall continue to make Good Faith Efforts to ensure that DBEs have an opportunity to successfully perform in the contract, and to ensure that the contractor meets its DBE goal. These efforts shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: • Negotiating in good faith to attempt to finalize and execute a subcontract agreement with the DBEs committed to in the bid or proposal. • Documenting efforts to seek out and utilize additional DBEs when additional subcontractors and/or subconsultants are necessary and are authorized by the County. • Continuing to provide assistance to DBEs in obtaining bonding, lines of credit, etc., if required by the contractor. • Notifying a DBE, in writing, of any potential problem and making concerted efforts (efforts must be documented) to resolve the problem Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 37 of 47 prior to formally requesting the County’s written approval to substitute the DBE for cause. • As with all subcontractors and/or subconsultants, timely payment of all monies due and owing to DBEs. • Notifying the County in a timely manner, in writing, of any problems anticipated in attaining the DBE participation goal committed to in the bid/proposal. • The prime contractor/consultant may not count the participation of DBE subcontractors towards that prime contractor’s/consultant’s DBE achievements until and unless that amount which is being credited toward the goal has been paid to the DBE. 5. Termination of DBE Subcontractor for Good Cause (§26.53 (f)) The County requires that a Contractor/Consultant not terminate a DBE subcontractor without the County’s prior written consent. This includes, but is not limited to, instances in which a prime contractor seeks to perform work originally designated for a DBE subcontractor with its own forces or those of an affiliate, a non-DBE firm, or with another DBE firm. The County will provide such written consent only if it agrees, for reasons stated in the concurrence document, that the prime contractor has good cause to terminate the DBE firm. For purposes of this section, good cause includes the following circumstances: • The listed DBE subcontractor fails or refuses to execute a written contract; • The listed DBE subcontractor fails or refuses to perform the work of its subcontract in a way consistent with normal industry standards. Provided, however, that good cause does not exist if the failure or refusal of the DBE subcontractor to perform its work on the subcontract results from the bad faith or discriminatory action of the prime contractor; • The listed DBE subcontractor fails or refuses to meet the prime contractor’s reasonable, nondiscriminatory bond requirements; • The listed DBE subcontractor becomes bankrupt, insolvent, or exhibits credit unworthiness; • The listed DBE subcontractor is ineligible to work on public works projects because of suspension and debarment proceedings pursuant 2 CFR Parts 180, 215 and 1,200 or applicable state law; • The Prime contractor has determined that the listed DBE subcontractor is not a responsible contractor; • The listed DBE subcontractor voluntarily withdraws from the project and provides to you written notice of its withdrawal; Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 38 of 47 • The listed DBE is ineligible to receive DBE credit for the type of work required; • A DBE owner dies or becomes disabled with the result that the listed DBE contractor is unable to complete its work on the contract; • Other documented good cause that you determine compels the termination of the DBE subcontractor. Provided, that good cause does not exist if the prime contractor seeks to terminate a DBE it relied upon to obtain the contract so that the prime contractor can self-perform the work for which the DBE contractor was engaged or so that the prime contractor can substitute another DBE or non-DBE contractor after contract award. Before transmitting to the County its request to terminate and/or substitute a DBE subcontractor, the prime contractor must give notice in writing to the DBE subcontractor, with a copy to the County, of its intent to request to terminate and/or substitute, and the reason for the request. The Contractor/Consultant must give the DBE five (5) days to respond to the Contractor’s/Consultant’s notice and advise the County and the contractor of the reasons, if any, why it objects to the proposed termination of its subcontract and why the County should not approve the prime contractor’s action. If required in a particular case as a matter of public necessity (e.g., safety), you may provide a response period shorter than five (5) days. In addition to post-award terminations, the provisions of this section apply to pre-award deletions of/or substitutions of DBE firms put forward by Offerors in negotiated procurements. Good Faith Efforts when a DBE is replaced on a contract for Good Cause (26.53(g)) Pursuant to 49 CFR, Part 26(g) the County will require a Contractor/Consultant to make good faith efforts to replace a DBE that is terminated or has otherwise failed to complete its work on a contract with another certified DBE, to the same extent needed to meet the contract goal established. The County will require the Contractor/Consultant to notify the DBELO immediately of the DBEs inability or unwillingness to perform and provide reasonable documentation. Substitutions of an approved DBE subcontractor/subconsultant, or changes in any scope of work to be performed by any approved DBE subcontractors/subconsultants must be requested, in writing, by the contractor and must be approved by the County. The contractor shall complete and submit to the County the corresponding “Request for DBE Subcontractor/Supplier Substitution” form (Refer to Exhibit K). The Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 39 of 47 contractor/consultant must also submit a biography of the new DBE firm and the reason for the substitution. The County requires that the Contractor/Consultant provide the County with copies of the new or amended subcontracts. If the candidate contractor to be substituted is not a DBE, the County also requires the prime contractor to submit documentation of their good faith efforts. The prime contractor must submit good faith efforts documentation for DBE substitutions within 7 days of notice to the County; the timeline may be extended an additional 7 days at the contractor’s request. The County shall then provide a written determination to the contractor stating whether or not good faith efforts have been demonstrated. A prime contractor’s inability to find a replacement DBE at the original price is not alone sufficient to support a finding of good faith efforts to replace the original DBE. A substitute DBE, at the time of substitution, must possess the appropriate NAICS or work category code(s) applicable to the type of work the substitute DBE will perform on the contract. Failure to Secure Prior Approval If the Contractor/Consultant fails or refuses to comply in the time specified the County may take appropriate actions, including but not limited to those set forth in its Monitoring and Enforcement Mechanisms. 6. Replacing DBEs 26.53(g) When a DBE subcontractor is terminated as provided in paragraph (f) of this section or fails to complete its work on the contract for any reason, you must require the prime contractor to make good faith efforts to find another DBE subcontractor to substitute for the original DBE. These good faith efforts shall be directed at finding another DBE to perform at least the same amount of work under the contract as the DBE that was terminated, to the extent needed to meet the contract goal you established for the procurement. The good faith efforts shall be documented by the contractor. If the recipient requests documentation under this provision, the contractor shall submit the documentation within 7 days, which may be extended for an additional 7 days if necessary, at the request of the contractor, and the recipient shall provide a written determination to the contractor stating whether or not good faith efforts have been demonstrated. 7. Prime Contract Provisions 26.53(h) County must include in each prime contract the contract clause required by §26.13(b) stating that failure by the contractor to carry out the requirements of this part is a material breach of the contract and may result in the termination of the contract or such other remedies set forth in that section Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 40 of 47 you deem appropriate if the prime contractor fails to comply with the requirements of this section. 8. Copies of DBE Subcontracts County must require the contractor awarded the contract to make available upon request a copy of all DBE subcontracts. The subcontractor shall ensure that all subcontracts or an agreement with DBEs to supply labor or materials require that the subcontract and all lower tier subcontractors be performed in accordance with this part's provisions. 9. Request for Additional DBE Subcontractor If the contractor requests to award additional work to a DBE firm beyond the original list of DBEs provided with their respective bid or proposal, the contractor must complete and submit to the County the “Request for Additional DBE Subcontractor/Supplier” form (Refer to Exhibit L). The contractor must also submit a biography of the DBE firm he/she is adding and the reason for the request to add. 10. Change in Contract Amount Change orders, or any other contract modifications that impact DBE scopes of work, must be reviewed by the County prior to the Contractor/Consultant effectuating any modifications. The County will determine impact on the Contractor’s/Consultant’s goal commitments and resultant goal attainments. C. Administrative Remedies and Enforcement for DBE Non-Compliance CONTRACTOR must fully comply with the DBE contract requirements, including County’s DBE Program and Title 49 CFR, Part 26 “Participation of Disadvantaged Businesses in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs,” and ensure that all Subcontractors, regardless of tier, are also fully compliant. Failure by CONTRACTOR to carry out these requirements is a material breach of this Agreement, which may result in the termination of this Agreement, or such other remedy as the County deems appropriate, which may include, but is not limited to suspension of progress payments In instances of identified non-compliance, a Cure Notice will be issued to CONTRACTOR identifying the DBE non-compliance matter(s) and specifying the required course of action for remedy. A non-compliant contractor may be notified by the DBELO or designee, that administrative remedies shall be imposed for failure to: (a) meet the contractor’s DBE commitment by contract end, (b) submit documentation of Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 41 of 47 adequate good faith efforts, (c) submit required DBE utilization reports, (d) submit verification of prompt payment to subcontractors/subconsultants, and/or (e) comply with proper DBE add/substitution/termination procedures. The notice shall state the administrative remedy(ies) to be imposed. The Contractor/Consultant shall be given ten (10) working days from the date of the Cure Notice to file a written appeal to the County’s DBELO. Failure to respond within the ten (10) day period shall constitute a waiver of appeal. The DBELO or his designee may schedule a hearing to gather additional facts and evidence and shall issue a final written determination on the matter within thirty (30) working days following receipt of the written appeal. The written decision of the County’s DBELO or designee is final and there is no further appeal. Administrative Remedies shall be determined by the DBELO, and may include, but not be limited to: • Suspension of progress payments to the contractor or of any monies held by the County as retention on the contract until the contractor is brought into compliance; and/or Failure to comply with the Cure Notice and/or to remedy the identified DBE non-compliance matter(s) is a material breach of contract and is subject to administrative remedies including withholding at a minimum of two percent (2%) of the invoice amount due per month for every month that the identified non-compliance matter(s) is not remedied. Upon satisfactory compliance, the County will release all withholdings. In addition to administrative remedies defined in this section, the County is not precluded from invoking other contractual and/or legal remedies available under federal, state or local laws. D. Administrative Remedies for Non-Compliance by Contractors for Contracts with DBE Participation Goals In the event that the contractor is unable to meet the DBE goal, the County reserves the right to initiate Administrative Remedies, which shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: a) Withholding of payments due equivalent to the difference between the actual DBE attainment and the contract DBE goal; b) Suspension of payment to the Contractor of any other monies held by the County; Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 42 of 47 c) Termination of the Contract, in part or in whole. The Administrative Remedies shall not apply if the Contractor is able to demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the County, that it exercised Good Faith Efforts in an attempt to meet the contract DBE goal. The Reconsideration Official (RO), at his/her sole discretion, may schedule a hearing to gather additional facts and evidence and shall issue a final determination on the matter within five (5) working days of receipt of the written appeal. The written decision of the RO or designee is final and cannot be further appealed. The County will bring to the attention of the U.S. DOT Operating Administration, in writing, any false, fraudulent, or dishonest conduct in connection with the County’s DBE program, to enable the U.S. DOT Operating Administration to take the necessary and appropriate steps (e.g. referral to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution, referral to the U.S. DOT Inspector General, or action under suspension and debarment or Program Fraud and Civil Penalties rules) as provided in Title 49 CFR, Part 26, Section 26.109. The County also will consider similar action under its own legal authorities, including, but not limited to, responsibility determinations in future contracts. IX. DBE CERTIFICATION STANDARDS (§26.81) A. California Unified Certification Program (UCP) (§ 26.81) 49 CFR §26.81 requires all public agencies that receive U.S. DOT financial assistance to participate in a statewide Unified Certification Program (UCP). A UCP is a “one-stop shopping” certification program that standardizes DBE eligibility criteria and the application process and eliminates the need for a DBE to certify with multiple agencies within the state. The County is a non-certifying member of a Unified Certification Program (UCP) administered by the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP). The UCP will meet all of the requirements of this section. The County will use and count for DBE credit only those DBE firms certified by the CUCP. CUCP agencies are classified as certifying and non-certifying members. CUCP certifying members perform DBE certifications which apply to all U.S. DOT funded contracts. Certification activities include processing applications, reviewing financial and company ownership information, performing site visit and employee interviews, making certification decisions, investigating certification complaints and appeals, and maintaining a single statewide directory of certified Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 43 of 47 DBEs. A business certified as a DBE by any CUCP certifying member is automatically accepted by all U.S. DOT recipients in California. Effective August 1, 2013, the California UCP (including Caltrans) is no longer issuing DBE Certificates as evidence of certification. A copy of a printout from the DBE Database should be sufficient proof of a firm's certification. Prime contractors and awarding agencies should not impose on DBE firms the burden of providing a DBE certificate in their bid packages - it is not required. A non-certifying member agency adheres to all aspects of the U.S. DOT DBE program, except that it does not perform DBE certification activities. The County is a NON-certifying member of the CUCP; therefore, The County accepts DBE certifications from all CUCP certifying members. The County maintains a copy of the latest CUCP Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) on file, as well as a Declaration of Status Letter signed by the County’s DBELO and the CUCP Secretary and Chair. For certification inquiries, contact one of the agencies listed below: Agency Business Address Telephone No. Fax No. City of Los Angeles Office of Contract Compliance www.lacity.org/bca 1149 South Broadway Street, Room 300 Los Angeles, CA 90015 (213) 847-1922 (213) 847-2777 Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (METRO) Diversity and Economic Opportunity Department www.metro.net One Gateway Plaza Los Angeles, CA 90012 (213) 922-2600 (213) 922-7660 S. F. Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) Office of Civil Rights www.bart.gov 300 Lakeside Drive, 18th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 464-7580 (510) 464-7587 City of Fresno DBE Program www.ci.fresno.ca.us 2101 G Street, Building A Fresno, CA 93706 (559) 621-1182 (559) 488-1069 Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) Small & Disadvantaged Businesses www.vta.org 3331 North First Street San Jose, CA 95134 (408) 321-5962 (408) 955-9729 Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 44 of 47 Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (CCCTA) Office of Civil Rights www.cccta.org 2477 Arnold Industrial Way Concord, CA 94520 (925) 676-1976 (925) 686-2630 San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) Contract Compliance Office San Francisco Municipal Railway www.sfmuni.org 1 South Van Ness Avenue, 3rd Floor San Francisco, CA 94103 (415) 701-4443 (415) 701-4347 San Mateo County Transit District (SAMTRANS) / Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (CALTRAIN) DBE Office www.samtrans.com 1250 San Carlos Avenue San Carlos, CA 94070 (650) 508-7939 (650) 508-7738 California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) Office of Business & Economic Opportunity – MS #79 www.dot.ca.gov 1823 14th Street Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 324-1700 (866) 810-6346 (916) 324-1862 X. RECORDKEEPING AND MONITORING (§26.11, §26.37) The County maintains a recordkeeping system which identifies U.S. DOT-assisted contract awards and tracks prime contractors’ progress in achieving DBE goals. The County verifies payments made to DBEs and keeps record of actual DBE attainments. Any areas of identified non-compliance are subject to administrative sanctions as outlined in this manual. The County’s records serve to document all information, for each U.S. DOT-assisted contract, needed to comply with U.S. DOT regulations. Records will include, but will not be limited to, the following information: 1. Contract funding source(s); 2. Contract title and number; 3. DBE contract goal, if applicable, and methodology used in establishing the goal; 4. Prime contractor/consultant name, address and primary contact; 5. DBE commitment (percentage and dollar value of contract allocated to DBEs); 6. Good Faith Effort (GFE) scoring sheet and evaluation results, if applicable; 7. Name, certification status (DBE or non-DBE) and subcontract dollar value for each listed subcontractor; Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 45 of 47 8. DBE status, gender, ethnicity, and dollar value of participation for each listed DBE; 9. Type of work performed by each listed DBE (i.e., subcontractor, regular dealer/supplier, broker, manufacturer, trucking company, etc.); 10. Copy of current certification for each listed DBE or CUCP website printout; 11. Tally of DBE utilization throughout the life of the contract, including final DBE utilization reported at contract close-out; 12. Field observation/on-site interview forms; 13. Report measuring DBE commitment percentage and dollar amount vs. actual attainment; 14. Certification by the County, attesting to having monitored contractor compliance, documentation submittal requirements, and on-site performance; and 15. Outreach efforts made by the County to inform DBEs of the contracting opportunity and inform prime bidders/proposers of DBE availability and interest in the contract. A. Monitoring Payments to DBEs (§ 26.37) The County will implement appropriate mechanisms to ensure compliance with 49 CFR Part 26 requirements by all program participants (e.g., applying legal and contract remedies available under Federal, state and local law). Additionally, the County’s DBE Program will include a monitoring and enforcement mechanism to ensure that work committed to DBEs at contract award is actually performed by DBEs. Such mechanism will provide a running tally of actual DBE attainments (e.g., payments actually made to DBE firms), including a means of comparing these attainments to commitments. The County will display both DBE commitments and attainments (race-neutral and race-conscious) in its reports of DBE participation to the U.S. DOT. The County may perform interim audits of contract payments to DBEs. The audit will review payments to DBE subcontractors to ensure that the actual amount paid to DBE subcontractors equals or exceeds the dollar amounts committed. B. On-Site Performance Monitoring During the course of the contract containing a DBE goal, the County or an agent of the County may conduct on-site monitoring to ensure that work committed to DBEs is actually being performed by DBEs. This monitoring effort is fully Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 46 of 47 incorporated into the County’s DBE On-site Compliance field observation process. This observed work will be reconciled against the DBE subcontractor agreement(s) and Prime Contractor Form 103. During an on-site visit to the firm’s principal place of business, The County will interview the principal officers and review their resumés and/or work histories. The County may also interview key personnel of the firm if necessary. The County must also perform an on-site visit to job sites if there are such sites on which the firm is working at the time of the eligibility investigation in your jurisdiction or local area. You may rely upon the site visit report of any other recipient with respect to a firm applying for certification. After an on-site visit, the County will analyze documentation related to the legal structure, ownership, and control of the applicant firm. This includes, but is not limited to, Articles of Incorporation/Organization; corporate by-laws or operating agreements; organizational, annual, and board/member meeting records; stock ledgers and certificates; and State-issued Certificates of Good Standing. The County will also analyze the bonding and financial capacity of the firm; lease and loan agreements; and bank account signature cards. The County will determine the work history of the firm, including contracts it has received, work it has completed, and payroll records. The County will obtain a statement from the firm of the type of work it prefers to perform as part of the DBE program and its preferred locations for performing the work, if any. The County will also obtain or compile a list of the equipment owned by or available to the firm and the licenses the firm and its key personnel possess to perform the work it seeks to do as part of the DBE program. The County will further obtain complete Federal income tax (or requests for extensions) filed by the firm, its affiliates, and the socially and economically disadvantaged owners for the last 3 years. A complete return includes all forms, schedules, and statements filed with the Internal Revenue Service and the applicable State taxing County. C. Written Certification At contract close-out, the County’s DBELO or designee will complete and file, a written certification attesting to having reviewed and monitored contractor documentation, on-site performance when applicable, and payments to DBEs to verify compliance with DBE requirements. D. Bidders List (§ 26.11) All prime bidders/proposers are required to complete and submit to the County, a Bidders List for their firm and for all firms (DBEs and non-DBEs) that submitted a bid, quote or proposal to the prime bidder/proposer. Contra Costa County Airports Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program Page 47 of 47 E. Retention of Records (§ 26.11(d)) The County will maintain records documenting its compliance with the requirements of this part. The County will keep a complete application package for each certified firm and all affidavits of no-change, change notices, and on-site reviews. These records will be retained in accordance with applicable record retention requirements for the recipient's financial assistance agreement. Other certification or compliance related records will be retained for a minimum of three (3) years unless otherwise provided by applicable record retention requirements for the recipient's financial assistance agreement, whichever is longer. F. Reporting to the U.S. DOT (§ 26.11) Annual Reports of DBE Awards/Commitments and Payments (49 CFR 26, Appendix B) The County’s DBELO or designee shall submit for FAA review and approval, the annual Uniform Report of DBE Awards or Commitments and Payments. In conformance with FAA direction the County will submit reports through FAA’s Civil Rights Connect System by December 1 of each federal fiscal year. The reports shall list the dollar value of contracts and subcontracts awarded and completed within the reporting period and shall demonstrate the County’s progress toward attaining commitments made by providing on-going payment data. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AIRPORTS DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (DBE) OVERALL DBE GOAL AND METHODOLOGY FOR FEDERAL FISCAL YEARS (FFY) 2019-2021 (Covering the period of October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2021) I. INTRODUCTION The Contra Costa County Airports (the County) is required to develop and submit a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Overall Goal for DBE participation as a condition of receiving federal assistance, pursuant Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century; 49 CFR Part 26 “Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in U.S. Department of Transportation Programs” and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Master Funding Agreement. II. BACKGROUND Effective March 3, 2010, the United States Department of Transportation (“DOT”) issued a final rule affecting the implementation and management of the Department’s Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (“DBE”) program. The final rule, required submission of a goal-setting methodology on a three-year cycle. Pursuant to this final rule, the County is still required to conduct an annual review to account for changes that may warrant an adjustment to the overall goal or make an adjustment based on changed circumstances (i.e. significant change in the legal standards governing the DBE program, new contracting opportunities presented by the availability of new or different grant opportunities, etc.) to ensure the goal and program as a whole are narrowly tailored throughout the goal period. Under the three-year schedule, the County’s DBE goal and methodology submission is due to FAA on August 1, 2018 for proposed FAA funded contracting activities for Federal Fiscal Years (FFY) 2019/21. The County herein presents its Proposed Overall DBE Goal Methodology for FFY 2019/21 goal period, which resulted in a 7% Overall DBE Goal. III. DOT-ASSISTED CONTRACTING PROGRAM FOR FFY 2019-20121 Table 1 represents the Contra Costa County Airports’ (the County) U.S. DOT-assisted (FAA) contracting program, which includes projects considered in preparing its Proposed Overall DBE Goal-Setting Methodology. The projects have viable subcontracting possibilities and corresponding availability of DBEs, a required criterion for Overall Goal consideration, and are anticipated to be awarded within the respective goal period. County Contra Costa Airports – FAA – Overall DBE Goal For FFY 2019 - 2021 Page 2 of 12 Table 1 PROJECT Total Estimated Cost (Federal Share) Buchanan - Design New ARFF Equipment Storage Bay $237,500 Buchanan Construction - Overlay/Reconstruction of RWY 14L/32R $3,990,000 Buchanan - Construction of new ARFF Equipment Storage Bay $2,850,000 Buchanan - Design Engineering and Enviro Analysis for Reconstruct/Overlay of Txwy Golf and Runway 01L Run-up $190,000 Buchanan - Construction of Asphalt Pavement Reconstruct/Overlay Txwy Golf and Runway 01L Run-up $1,140,000 TOTAL $8,407,500 Table 2 provides a summary of work grouped into one (3) primary categories: Construction, Professional Services and Materials and Supplies, utilizing the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) work categories and comparable 2016 Census Business Patterns NAICS Work Codes. Table 2 also serves to identify the estimated Federal Dollar Share and the Percent of Federal funding, as follows: Table 2 CONTRACT CATEGORY NAICS CUCP DATABASE ESTIMATED FEDERAL DOLLAR SHARE % OF FEDERAL FUNDING Construction 237110, 237310, 238110, 238120, 238130, 238160, 238170, 238210, 238220, 238310, 238320, 238910, 238990, 484110, 484220 $6,074,775.00 72.25% Professional Services 541310, 541330, 541350, 541370, 541380, 541512 541611, 541620, 541990 $1,645,875.00 19.58% Materials & Supplies 423320, 423390 $686,850.00 8.17% TOTAL $8,407,500 100% IV. GOAL METHODOLOGY Step 1: Determination of a Base Figure (26.45)1 To establish Contra Costa County Airports’ (County) Base Figure of the relative availability of DBEs to all comparable firms (DBE and Non-DBEs) available to propose on the County’s FFYs 2019-2021 DOT-assisted contracting opportunities projected to be solicited during the respective goal period; the County followed one of the five prescribed federal goal-setting methodologies in accordance with 49 CFR Part 26 regulations. This was accomplished by accessing the California Unified Certification Program (CUCP) Directory of Certified DBE Firms and the 1 §26.45 represents Title 49 CFR Part 26 regulatory referenced section. County Contra Costa Airports – FAA – Overall DBE Goal For FFY 2019 - 2021 Page 3 of 12 2016 U.S. Census Bureau County Business Patterns (CBP) Database. Comparisons were made within the County’s market area (defined as Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Marin County, Napa County, Sacramento County, San Francisco County, San Joaquin County, San Mateo County, Santa Clara County, Solano County, Sonoma County, and Stanislaus County) and by specified industries and types of businesses identified in Table 2. The County local market area represents where the substantial majority of the County of Contra Costa Airports’ contracting dollars are expended and/or where the substantial majority of contractors and subcontractors bids or quotes are received. The County of Contra Costa Airports made a concerted effort to ensure that the scope of businesses included in the numerator was as close as possible to the scope included in the denominator. For corresponding detail of all work category classifications grouped, refer to Table 3.  For the numerator: California UCP DBE Database of Certified Firms  For the denominator: 2016 U.S. Census Bureau’s Business Pattern Database (CBP) To determine the relative availability of DBEs, the County divided the numerator 2 representing the ratio of ready, willing and able DBE firms, by the denominator 3 representing all firms (DBE and Non-DBEs) available in each work category, see below: Number of Ready, Willing and Able DBEs = DBE Availability % Number of All Available Firms (Including DBEs and Non-DBEs) To determine the appropriate weighting percent by NAICS, the estimated dollar value by NAICS was divided by the total estimated federal dollars for FFY 2019/21. The weighting percent by NAICS was then multiplied by the DBE Availability % to determine the Base Figure % by NAICS, see below: Weighting X DBE Availability % = Base Figure % by NAICS To determine the Step 1 Base Figure, the County added together all Base Figure % by NAICS in Table 3 below, resulting in a 24.69% that was multiplied by 70%, (to account for 30% Prime performance required on most of the County’s contracts) to produce a Step 1 Base Figure of 17%. 1 26.45 represents Title 49 CFR Part 26 regulatory goal setting methodology reference. 2 Numerator represents all DBE firms established within the County’s market area. 3 Denominator represents all comparable available established firms within the County’s market area. County Contra Costa Airports – FAA – Overall DBE Goal For FFY 2019 - 2021 Page 4 of 12 Table 3 Step 2: Adjusting the Base Figure Upon establishing the Base Figure, Contra Costa County Airports (County) reviewed and assessed other known evidence potentially impacting the relative availability of DBEs within the County’s market area, in accordance with prescribed narrow tailoring provisions set forth under 49 CFR Part 26.45 Step 2; DBE Goal Adjustment guidelines. Evidence considered in making an adjustment to the Base Figure included the County’s Past DBE Goal Attainments, Disparity Studies, and Other Evidence, as follows: A. Past DBE Goal Attainments The following table below reflects the demonstrated capacity of DBEs (measured by historical DBE participation) on FTA-assisted contracts awarded by the County within the last three (3) Federal Fiscal Years: CATEGORY OF WORK NAICS CODES Weighting* DBE Availability % Base Figure % by NAICS Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction 237110 1.22% 42.99% 0.52% Highway, Street and Bridge Construction 237310 4.95% 91.86% 4.55% Poured Concrete Foundation and Structure Contractors 238110 9.49% 21.81% 2.07% Structural Steel and Precast Concrete Contractors 238120 1.69% 67.03% 1.14% Framing Carpentry Contractors 238130 6.78% 14.45% 0.98% Roofing Contractors 238160 0.85% 2.33% 0.02% Siding Contractors 238170 0.51% 7.04% 0.04% Electrical Contractors 238210 5.76% 5.23% 0.30% Plumbing, Heating, and Air-Conditioning Contractors 238220 3.39% 1.53% 0.05% Drywall and Insulation Contractors 238310 0.51% 3.88% 0.02% Painting and Wall Covering Contractors 238320 0.51% 2.68% 0.01% Site Preparation Contractors 238910 14.68% 23.04% 3.38% All Other Specialty Trade Contractors 238990 13.90% 20.19% 2.81% Brick, stone and related construction Material Merchant Wholesalers 423320 6.10% 39.47% 2.41% Other Construction Material Merchant Wholesaler (stripes/marking) 423390 2.07% 37.04% 0.77% General Freight Trucking, Local 484110 6.19% 15.05% 0.93% Specialized Freight Trucking, Local 484220 1.83% 37.16% 0.68% Architectural Services 541310 1.78% 8.15% 0.15% Engineering Services 541330 5.51% 13.74% 0.76% Building Inspection Services 541350 0.34% 47.31% 0.16% Surveying and Mapping (except Geophysical) Services 541370 0.05% 63.16% 0.03% Testing Laboratories 541380 1.66% 22.83% 0.38% Computer System Design Services (CADD) 541512 0.25% 8.93% 0.02% Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services 541611 7.37% 21.73% 1.60% Environmental Consulting Services 541620 0.95% 60.37% 0.57% All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services (Surveying) 541990 1.66% 21.10% 0.35% Total: 100% 24.69% Base Figure 24.69% *70% (30% Prime to Perform Factor) = 17.29% 17% (Rounded to the nearest whole number) County Contra Costa Airports – FAA – Overall DBE Goal For FFY 2019 - 2021 Page 5 of 12 Table 4 Year Attainment Byron FFY 2015* 21% Buchanan 0% Byron FFY 2016 0% Buchanan 4% Byron FFY 2017 0% Buchanan 28% Median of Past Awards = 0%, 0%, 0%, 4%, 21%, 28% = Average of two middle numbers: 0+4=4/2= 2% Median Past Participation = 2% *FFY 2018 still in progress as of the date of methodology preparation, so FFY 2015 was used in lieu of FFY 2018 The County considered an adjustment to the Base Figure based on the median DBE participation on DOT-assisted contracts completed within the past three FFYs (2015/17). The median established for the past three years is below the Base Figure derived from Step 1; therefore, an adjustment to the Base Figure based on the County’s past DBE goal participation has been made. As three years of DBE Participation data was reviewed and the years reviewed included projects with a similar variety in scope to the scopes projected for the 2019/21 period, the County can reasonably assume that the rates of DBE participation reflected are an accurate reflection of DBE capacity to perform in the 2019/21 overall goal period. The adjustment is calculated in accordance with FTA guidance by averaging the Base Figure with the Median DBE Past participation, as shown below. The formula resulted in a downward adjustment to Base Figure based from 17% to 10%. B. Evidence from Disparity Studies The County Contra Costa Airports (County) did not find it feasible to conduct its own independent availability/disparity study; however, the County identified three (3) disparity studies in the assessment of whether a Race-Conscious DBE Program should be adopted by the County. This was done in conformance with FAA’s recommendation for recipients to utilize relevant State or local disparity studies as a basis for developing race-conscious goals, to assist recipients with meeting the requirements pertaining to the Western Paving Ruling. The three identified Disparity Studies were the Caltrans Disparity Study, The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) Disparity Study and the Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority Disparity Study. The first Disparity Study considered was that of the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), completed in 2016 due to the timeliness of the contracts reviewed. The Caltrans Disparity Study reviewed Construction and Engineering contracts state-wide between the years 17% Base Figure + 2% Median Past Participation = 19% 19/2 = 9.5% Adjusted Base Figure: 10% County Contra Costa Airports – FAA – Overall DBE Goal For FFY 2019 - 2021 Page 6 of 12 January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2014. Overall, certified DBEs received 6.4 percent of the relevant contracting dollars that Caltrans and subrecipient local agencies awarded during the study period. As the Caltrans’ Disparity Study included thousands of contracts from areas outside of the County’s market area as well as projects that had no relation to the scopes included in this methodology the County opted to not utilize this Disparity Study to apply an adjustment to their base figure or their current race-neutral DBE application measures. The second Disparity Study taken into consideration was the 2015 Reno-Tahoe Airport Authority Disparity Study which was anticipated to be complete in 2016 but at the time this goal methodology was developed information was still not published. As this study and the accompanying analysis is not yet available the County did not utilize this Disparity Study to make an adjustment to the base figure. The third Disparity Study taken into consideration was the Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority (BGPAA) Disparity Study, completed in 2012 due to the similarity of contract types reviewed. Disparity analysis results indicated that most racial/ethnic and gender groups showed disparities on contracts where race- and gender-conscious measures were not in place during the study period. Since August 2006, BGPAA has solely used neutral means and has fallen considerably short of its annual goals for DBE participation.  BBC identified substantial disparities between the utilization of minority-owned firms in BGPAA contracts and what might be expected based upon the availability analysis (substantial disparities for each racial and ethnic group in the Federal DBE Program). Minority-owned firms were underutilized in BGPAA contracts even when the DBE contract goals program was in place. As a result, the Disparity Study recommended the use of contract DBE goals. As the Disparity Study satisfies the legal standards established by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Western States Paving Co., Inc. v. Washington State Department of Transportation, and guidance from the U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Transit Administration (FTA) concerning the implementation of race-conscious application, the County has elected to utilize this study as a basis for implementation of a race-conscious component of their Overall DBE goal. The County will ensure that the use of race-conscious goals is narrowly tailored and consistent with other relevant legal standards. The County will continue to review applicable Disparity Studies as they become available and apply the appropriate adjustments to their Race-neutral/Race-Conscious DBE goal application. D. Other Evidence The Federal DBE Program suggests that federal aid recipients also examine “other factors” when determining whether to make any step-2 adjustments to their base figures. To ensure the County of Contra Costa Airports (County) DBE goal was tailored and best represents the DBEs available to perform within the County’s market area and within the scopes identified, the County considered three like Agency DBE goals whose methodology utilized similar projects descriptions. The County first considered Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport’s (SJC) Overall DBE Goal for FFY 2017/2019 due to its market area (defined as Santa Clara and Alameda County Contra Costa Airports – FAA – Overall DBE Goal For FFY 2019 - 2021 Page 7 of 12 counties) and the scopes (5 of the 8 NAICS identified by SJC are included in the County’s methodology) included within its Overall DBE Goal-Setting Methodology. SJC’s methodology included a base figure of 11.13% that was adjusted in consideration of the FFY 2015 Past DBE Attainments (1.48%) to 6.30%. The County considered The Port of Oakland’s (OAK) Overall DBE Goal for FFY 2017/2019 due to its market area (defined as Contra Costa and Alameda counties) and the scopes (pavement and taxiway projects represented 94.8% of the projected dollars) included within its Overall DBE Goal-Setting Methodology. OAK’s methodology included a base figure of 11.22% that was adjusted in consideration of the average of past DBE Attainments achieved (4.8%) to 8.01%. The County considered San Francisco International Airport’s (SFO) Overall DBE Goal for FFY 2017/2019 due to its market area (defined as Contra Costa, Alameda, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano and Sonoma counties) and the scopes (pavement and taxiway projects represented 52% of the projected dollars) included within its Overall DBE Goal-Setting Methodology. SFO’s methodology included a base figure of 9.25% that was adjusted in consideration of the average of past DBE Attainments achieved (11.57%) to 10.41%. The County has found it reasonable to conclude the Median Past DBE Attainments of SJC, OAK and SFO which include nearby market areas and similar project scopes could be utilized to project the types of DBE attainments that the County may be able to achieve. In consideration of this, the County has made an adjustment to the base figure as depicted below: Table 5 Recipient Median Past Participation Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport (SJC) 1.48% The Port of Oakland 4.8% San Francisco International Airport’s (SFO) 11.57% Median of % Past Attainments =1.48+4.8%+ 11.57%= 4.8% Median of % Past Attainments = 4.8% Median of % Past Attainments + Adjusted Base Figure = 4.8% + 10% = 14.8% Base Figure Adjusted = 14.8% = 7.4% 2 Adjusted Base Figure = 7% (rounded) Given the above, the adjusted goal for FY 2019-2021 is 7%. OVERALL DBE GOAL AND PROJECTION OF RACE-NEUTRAL AND RACE- CONSCIOUS PARTICIPATION: County Contra Costa Airports – FAA – Overall DBE Goal For FFY 2019 - 2021 Page 8 of 12 The Overall DBE Goal for FFY 2019-2021 for the County Contra Costa Airports’ FAA- assisted contracts is 7%. The Overall Goal is expressed as a percentage of all DOT-assisted funds that County of Contra Costa Airports will expend in applicable DOT-assisted contracts in the given federal fiscal years. The goal further serves to identify the relative availability of DBE’s based on evidence of ready willing, and able DBE’s to all comparable firms, which are known to be available to compete for and perform on the County of Contra Costa Airports’ DOT-assisted contracts. V. RACE-NEUTRAL/RACE-CONSCIOUS BREAKOUT ANALYSIS The County of Contra Costa Airports (County) will implement race conscious measures, coupled with race-neutral measures based on the results received from the County’s analysis of its past utilization data and an examination of similar market area Disparity Studies. A. Consideration of the Amount by which the County has Exceeded Goals in the Past DOT has identified the amount a recipient has exceeded their overall goals in the past years as a useful tool in projecting the race/gender-neutral participation one can expect in future Federal Fiscal Years. The following table reflects the demonstrated capacity of DBEs on FTA-assisted contracts completed by the County within the last three (3) Federal Fiscal Years: Table 6 Overall DBE Goal by Period RN/RC Application Period Federal Fiscal Year DBE Attainment % Goal Exceeded Byron 12.79% RN FFY 2015* 21% 8% Buchanan 5.64% RC 0% -6% Byron 3.13% RN FFY 2016 0% -3% Buchanan 12.28% RC 4% -8% Byron** FFY 2017 Buchanan 12% RN 28% 16% % Goals Exceeded in numerical Order: -3%, -8%, -6%, 8%, 16% -6% Median Amount Goals have been Exceeded *FFY 2018 still in progress as of the date of methodology preparation, so FFY 2015 was used in lieu of FFY 2018 **Excluded from analysis as goal information was not available The County’s Historical Past race-neutral participation above the DBE goal produced a median of 0% DBE Participation (as illustrated in the table above). As the County’s historical DBE Participation does not exceed the projected DBE goal valid during the attainment periods, it is reasonable to conclude that the FFY 2019/21 goal cannot be met race-neutrally based on this factor. B. Past Participation by DBE Prime Contractors DOT has identified that the amount of past participation obtained through the use of DBE primes should be considered achieved race/gender-neutrally and that those attainments can be used as a basis for estimating a similar level of race/gender-neutral participation in the next overall goal period. County Contra Costa Airports – FAA – Overall DBE Goal For FFY 2019 - 2021 Page 9 of 12 Therefore, the County considered the amount of past DBE participation (based on awards) obtained through the use of DBE primes in FFYs 2015, 2016 and 2017 below: Table 7 FFY Total Dollar Value Awarded to DBE Prime Total Dollar Value of Awarded Contracts Byron 2017 $ 0 $ 0 Buchanan $ 0 $ 527,129 Byron 2016 $ 0 $ 0 Buchanan $ 0 $ 1,583,965 Byron 2015 $ 0 $ 834,506 Buchanan $ 0 $0 Totals: $0 $2,945,600.00 % DBE Prime Participation 0% The County found that 0% of the DBE participation during FFYs 2015 through 2017 was produced by the utilization of DBE primes. This value was developed by dividing the total dollars awarded to DBE Primes ($0) by the total dollars awarded on all Primes contracts ($2,945,600) within FFYs 2015 through 2017, as displayed in the table above. The County confirmed that the projects completed during FFYs 2015 through 2017 were similar to the types of projects being procured in the upcoming overall goal period, a required criterion for consideration in utilizing DBE prime participation to validate race-neutral application. As 0% DBE participation was achieved on like-projects during the attainment period reviewed the County concluded that this rate of DBE participation would be an accurate reflection of DBE prime capacity in the primary types of work projected to be performed in the coming overall goal period. C. Consider Past Participation by DBE Subcontractors on Contracts without Goals DOT has identified that the amount of past participation obtained through the use of DBE subcontractors on contracts without DBE goals should be considered achieved race/gender-neutrally and that those attainments can be used as a basis for estimating a similar level of race/gender-neutral participation in the next overall goal period. Therefore, the County considered the amount of past DBE subcontractor participation on contracts without DBE goals in FFYs 2015, 2016 and 2017 below: Table 8 FFY Total Dollar Value Awarded to DBE Subs on RN Contracts Total Dollar Value of Awarded Contracts without Goals Byron 2017 $ 0 $ 0 Buchanan $ 94,380 $ 372,186 Byron 2016 $ 0 $ 0 Buchanan** Byron 2015 $ 162,000 $ 752,606 Buchanan** Totals: $256,380 $1,124,792 % DBE Prime Participation 22.79% = 23%* *Rounded to the nearest whole number **Excluded from analysis as participation was achieved with race-conscious measures County Contra Costa Airports – FAA – Overall DBE Goal For FFY 2019 - 2021 Page 10 of 12 A DBE participation value of 23% was derived by the utilization of DBE firms in the Race-Neutral (RN) periods above. Although the County reviewed a three-year period to provide a sufficient sampling of performance on past projects, closer examination uncovered that the 2015 FFY included RC participation, so this participation was excluded from the analysis. The County confirmed that the projects completed during FFYs 2015 through 2017 were similar to the types of projects being procured in the upcoming overall goal period, a required criterion for consideration in utilizing race-neutral DBE subcontractor participation to validate race-neutral application. As 23% DBE participation was achieved on like- projects during the attainment period reviewed the County concluded that this rate of DBE participation would be an accurate reflection of DBE subcontractor’s capacity to perform race-neutrally in the 2019/21 overall goal period. D. Consider MBE/WBE/DBE Participation Pursuant to Race/Gender-Neutral State or Local Programs. The County monitors DBE participation but does not currently track MBE/WBE/DBE participation on Race/Gender-Neutral or Local Programs. The County will consider methods of tracking this information in the future for use in considering the proper race/gender-neutral application. E. Past History of Inability to Achieve Goals DOT has identified that a recipient’s past inability to meet their goals in the past years as a powerful indicator that the recipient may be justified in applying race-/gender-conscious measures to achieve their goals in future Federal Fiscal Years. The following table below reflects the demonstrated capacity of DBEs (measured by historical DBE participation) on FTA-assisted contracts awarded by the County within the last three (3) Federal Fiscal Years: Table 9 Overall DBE Goal by Period RN/RC Application Period Federal Fiscal Year DBE Attainment % Beneath Goal Byron 12.79% RN FFY 2015* 21% 8.21% Buchanan 5.64% RC 0% -5.64% Byron 3.13% RN FFY 2016 0% -3.13% Buchanan 12.28% RC 4% -8.28% Byron** FFY 2017 Buchanan 12% RN 28% 16% % Goals Exceeded in numerical Order: -8.28%, -5.64%, -3.13%, 8.21%,16% -3% Median Past History of Inability to Achieve Goals *FFY 2018 still in progress as of the date of methodology preparation, so FFY 2015 was used in lieu of FFY 2018 **Excluded from analysis as participation was achieved with race-conscious measures The County’s historical DBE participation produced a shortfall in their ability to meet goals in Federal Fiscal Years 2015 through 2017. As three years of DBE Participation data was reviewed for projects with similar scopes and values to the projects in the upcoming goal period, the County can reasonably assume that the rates of DBE participation reflected are an accurate reflection of DBE capacity to perform race-neutrally in the 2019/21 overall goal period. The County has applied this to the proposed DBE Goal to project the necessary race- conscious/race-neutral breakout, as illustrated below: County Contra Costa Airports – FAA – Overall DBE Goal For FFY 2019 - 2021 Page 11 of 12 Consistent with the FAA guidance provided and the reasons delineated above the County has found it advisable to implement the race-neutral/race-conscious breakout illustrated above to meet the proposed Overall DBE Goal in accordance with 49 CFR Part 26.51. F. Monitor DBE Participation to Determine Whether an Adjustment to the Use of Race/Gender-Conscious Measures is Necessary The County will continue to monitor its DBE participation during the overall goal period to determine whether the application of race-neutral/race-conscious measures to meet the proposed Overall DBE Goal remains on target. The County will adjust the application of race/gender-neutral and race/gender- conscious measures, as necessary to ensure they meet the maximum feasible portion the overall goal by using race/gender-neutral means of facilitating DBE participation. VI. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND FACILITATION In accordance with Public Participation Regulatory Requirements of Title 49 CFR Part 26, minority, women, local business chambers, and community organizations within the County’s market area were consulted and provided an opportunity to review the goal analysis and provide input. The County prepared Outreach Consultation Letters advising the aforementioned business community of the proposed DBE goal analysis and its availability for review and comment on the County’s website. The County issued a Public Notice publishing the County’s Overall Goal for the FFY 2019/21 FAA- assisted contracts on their website. The Notice informed the public that the proposed goal and rationale were available for inspection on the County’s website and that the County would accept comments on the goal analysis for 30 days from the date of the Public Notice. Additionally, the Public Notice requested participation from the public in a forum to discuss and share their valuable experience and input pertaining to effects of discrimination on opportunities for DBE's in the County’s market area. The public was informed that the County would give full consideration to all comments and input received as a part of the consultation process and would assess its impact on the Proposed Overall DBE Goal. The final Overall Goal submitted to FAA for approval will remain on the County’s website through the life of the goal period. As a follow-up, the County invited the public as well as identified minority, women and general contractor groups and organizations within the County’s market area to attend a public forum (December 20, 2018) from 9:00am to 11:00 am), in order to provide testimony and any additional information regarding effects of discrimination on opportunities for DBE's in the County‘s market % Goals Exceeded in Past = -6% RN DBE Prime Participation = 0% RN DBE Subcontractor Participation= 23% Past Inability to Meet Goal (Median below goal) = -3% -6% + 0% + 23% + -3% = 11% 14% / 4 = 3.5% (Average RN Participation) 4% RN Projection (Rounded to the nearest whole number) DBE Goal: 7% RN Application 4% / RC Application 3% County Contra Costa Airports – FAA – Overall DBE Goal For FFY 2019 - 2021 Page 12 of 12 area. The County identified 310 of these groups and organizations for direct solicitation to participate in the public forum, review the proposed goal and share their valuable experience and input. Additionally, the County consults and will continue to consult with minority groups and organizations year-round via event attendance and facilitation to directly solicit the public in-person regarding input they have on DBE opportunities. Comment review produced one, therefore an adjustment to the goal was not necessary. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Engineer, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (FC District), or designee, to partner with the State of California Coastal Conservancy (SCC) to apply for grant assistance in the form of the National Coastal Wetlands Conservation (NCWC) Grant Program, in the amount of $1,000,000, for partial implementation of the North Reach of the Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project, Martinez area. FISCAL IMPACT: Requested grant amount of $1,000,000 of Federal NCWC funds, local match of $240,000 funded by Flood Control District Zone 3B funds included in current project budget. BACKGROUND: Following the 2014 congressional “selective deauthorization” of the most downstream 4 miles of Walnut and Pacheco Creeks, the FC District has completed a community-based planning process that identified a preferred alternative for restoration work of Lower Walnut Creek. The project subsequently attracted grant funding from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that covered the design and regulatory permitting APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Paul Detjens, (925) 313-2394 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Paul Detjens, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control C. 11 To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Lower Walnut Creek — National Coastal Wetlands Conservation Grant. Project No. 7520-6B8285 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) phases of work. Now the FC District is seeking grant funding for implementation of the restoration project. The NCWC grant is a federal program that is only available to eligible agencies in coastal states, such as California. The SCC has confirmed their eligibility and has agreed to apply on behalf of the FC District for the Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project. The SCC would be the grant applicant, and the FC District would serve as a subgrantee via a future agreement with the SCC. If the project is selected for NCWC funding, the FC District would negotiate a subgrantee agreement with the SCC and return to the Board for approval of the subgrantee agreement. Because the NCWC Grant Program is a good match for the Lower Walnut Creek Restoration Project funding, the SCC has recommended applying for the maximum one million award for implementation funding. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without the Board of Supervisors’ approval, the FC District will not be able to partner with the SCC to apply for the NCWC Grant described above. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/189 authorizing the Chief Engineer, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Flood Control District), or designee, to apply, accept, and execute grant agreements and related amendments with the California Department of Water Resources for the Wildcat Creek Fish Passage and Community Engagement project, North Richmond area. FISCAL IMPACT: The grant application and agreement (if awarded) with the California Department of Water Resources Urban Streams Restoration Program (USRP) will provide funding up to $1,000,000 for the Flood Control District’s proposed Wildcat Creek Fish Passage and Community Engagement project. Because of the project’s location in a disadvantaged community, the grant program specifically does not require local matching funds. BACKGROUND: Staff is seeking grant funding for the proposed Wildcat Creek Fish Passage and Community Engagement project from the USRP. This program is funded by Propositions 84 and 68. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gus Amirzehni, (925) 313-2128 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator's Office, Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Paul Detjens, Flood Control, Gus Amirzehni, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control C. 12 To:Contra Costa County Flood Control District Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:ADOPT Resolution for Grant Application and Acceptance with California Dept. of Water Resources Urban Streams Restoration Program for Wildcat Creek. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The Wildcat Creek flood control channel was constructed in the 1990s by the Flood Control District and the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to reduce flood risk and improve economic vitality in the North Richmond community. The project included a low-flow channel and fish ladder to facilitate fish passage. However, the fish ladder has not functioned as designed due to excessive debris and sediment accumulation. The USACE has studied the fish ladder structure extensively under their Section 1135 program and has produced a preliminary retrofit design to improve fish passage consistent with current fish passage criteria. The Flood Control District and local partners studied the options for either proceeding further under the Corps’ Section 1135 program or proceeding with other available nonfederal grant funding. The answer became clear that other nonfederal grant funding, such as the USRP, would provide a more efficient and cost-effective path to possible project implementation. As such, the Flood Control District in partnership with the John Muir Chapter of Trout Unlimited, a nonprofit organization, is planning to apply for a USRP grant to fund the development of construction and CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) documents and solicitation of regulatory permits for the retrofit design. Additionally, as requested by the City of San Pablo, the grant will include a minor physical modification to an existing weir structure in Wildcat Creek at the upstream limit of the USACE project to provide better flow conditions to a nearby storm drain outfall and reduce flood risk to the surrounding area. The grant will also include other community access and recreational enhancements. The USRP grant requires that the governing board of the applicant approve a resolution authorizing the application, acceptance, execution, and designation of staff to sign and execute grant agreements and related documents (if selected for funding) for and on behalf of the Flood Control District. This request is made in response to that grant requirement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without the Board’s approval, staff will not be able to apply for, or obtain, state funding under the USRP. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2019/189 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2019/189 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/189 In The Matter Of: Authorizing the Chief Engineer, Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Flood Control District), or designee, to Apply, Accept, and Execute Grant Agreements and related Amendments with the California Department of Water Resources for the Wildcat Creek Fish Passage and Community Engagement Project, North Richmond area. WHEREAS, the Flood Control District proposes to implement the Wildcat Creek Fish Passage and Community Engagement Project; and WHEREAS, the Flood Control District intends to apply for grant funding from the California Department of Water Resources for the Wildcat Creek Fish Passage and Community Engagement Project. WHEREAS, the Flood Control District has the legal authority and is authorized to enter into a funding agreement with the State of California, if selected for funding; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors, as the governing body of the Flood Control District as follows: 1. That pursuant and subject to all of the terms and provisions of Safe Drinking Water, Water Quality and Supply, Flood Control, River and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2006 (Pub. Resources Code, Section 75001 et seq.) and the California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access For All Act of 2018 (Pub. Resources Code, Section 80000 et seq.), the Chief Engineer, Flood Control District, or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and file an application for funding with the Department of Water Resources and take such other actions as necessary or appropriate to obtain grant funding. 2. The Chief Engineer, Flood Control District, or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to execute the funding agreement with the California Department of Water Resources and any amendments thereto. 3. The Chief Engineer, Flood Control District, or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to submit any required documents, invoices, and reports required to obtain grant funding. Contact: Gus Amirzehni, (925) 313-2128 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Laura Strobel, County Administrator's Office, Allison Knapp, Deputy Chief Engineer, Tim Jensen, Flood Control, Paul Detjens, Flood Control, Gus Amirzehni, Flood Control, Catherine Windham, Flood Control RECOMMENDATION(S): DENY claims filed by Ernesto Balderramos, Elijah Dominguez (3), Peter Doppe, Cornelius Green, Jose P. Huayllasco, Jesus Jauregui, Nickolas Jessup, Carlos Luquin, the estate of Yuenwah, Tanglo, Eddie Thomas Jr. and Dejanae Marshay Malone-McFarland, Edward L. Turner, and Sun Shui Wong. DENY amended claim filed by Robin Stumps. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Ernesto Balderramos: Property claim for damage to vehicle arising out of motor vehicle accident with County employee in undisclosed amount. Elijah Dominguez: Personal injury claim for violation of civil rights in the amount of $4,500,000. Elijah Dominguez: Personal injury claim for HIPAA violation, theft and fraud in the amount of $5,000,000. Elijah Dominguez: Personal injury claim for battery and unlawful detention in the amount of $8,000,000. Peter Doppe: Personal injury claim for unlawful termination in the amount of $1,000,000. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Scott Selby 925.335.1400 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 13 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Claims BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Cornelius Green: Property claim for lost personal property in undisclosed amount. Jose P. Huayllasco: Property claim for damaged fence in the amount of $400. Jesus Jauregui: Property claim for lost personal property at CCRMC in the amount of $300. Nickolas Jessup: Property claim for damage to vehicle arising out of motor vehicle accident with County employee in the amount of $7,300. Carlos Luquin: Property claim for lost personal property at CCRMC in the amount of $100. The Estate of Yuenwah Tanglo: Personal injury claim for wrongful death arising out of motor vehicle accident in an amount to be determined. Eddie Thomas Jr. & Dejanae Marshay Malone-McFarland: Personal injury claim for wrongful arrest and battery in an amount to be determined. Edward L. Turner: Personal injury claim for violation of civil rights in undisclosed amount. Sun Shui Wong: Claim for refund to correct tax bill in the amount of $1,793.27 Robin Stumps: Personal injury claim for a trip and fall in an amount to exceed $25,000. RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE this report concerning the final settlement of Guy Worth and AUTHORIZE payment from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund in an amount not to exceed $400,000. FISCAL IMPACT: Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund payment of $400,000. BACKGROUND: Attorney Mark A. Cartier, defense counsel for the County, has advised the County Administrator that within authorization an agreement has been reached settling the workers' compensation claim of Guy Worth v. Contra Costa County. The Board's May 21, 2019 closed session vote was: Supervisors Gioia, Andersen, Burgis, Mitchoff and Glover - Yes. This action is taken so that the terms of this final settlement and the earlier May 21, 2019 closed session vote of this Board authorizing its negotiated settlement are known publicly. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Case will not be settled. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Denise Rojas 335-1400 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 14 To:Board of Supervisors From:Denise Rojas, Interim Risk Manager Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Final Settlement of Claim, Guy Worth vs. Contra Costa County RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/156 recognizing the month of May 2019 as Older Americans Month in Contra Costa County, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 15 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Proclaim May 2019 Older Americans Month AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/156 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2019/156 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2019/156 May 2019 as Older Americans Month WHEREAS, Contra Costa County includes older Americans who richly contribute to our community; and WHEREAS, Each year, more and more older adults are making a positive impact in Contra Costa County. As volunteers, employees, employers, educators, mentors, advocates, and more, they offer insight and experience that benefit the entire community; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County is committed to strengthening our community by connecting with and supporting older adults, their families, and caregivers and acknowledging their many valuable contributions to society; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County recognizes the importance of bringing together all generations and engaging in activities that promote physical, mental, and emotional well-being for the benefit of all; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County can enhance the lives of older Americans in our community by: promoting home- and community-based services that support independent living; involving older adults in community events and other activities; providing opportunities for older adults to work, volunteer, learn, and lead; encouraging older adults to speak up for themselves and others; and providing opportunities for older adults to share their experiences; and WHEREAS, We acknowledge that what it means “to age” has changed—for the better; and WHEREAS, In Contra Costa County, the population of people over 60 years of age currently is 20.4%, and if following growth projections of California, will be at 25% in 2030; and WHEREAS, In California, the population of people aged 60 and over is expected to grow from 16.4% in 2012, to 18.3% in 2020 to 22% in 2030, leading the nation in number of residents over age 60; and WHEREAS, Contra Costa County is committed to supporting older adults as they take charge of their health, explore new opportunities and activities, and focus on independence; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, The Board of Supervisors does hereby proclaim May 2019 to be Older Americans Month and honors all of the individuals, organizations and agencies working to ensure that all older County residents are honored as essential and valuable members of our community. We urge every resident to take time during this month to acknowledge older adults and the people who serve them as influential and vital parts of our community. ___________________ JOHN GIOIA Chair, District I Supervisor ______________________________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN DIANE BURGIS District II Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy 13.1 C.1 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sandra Brown, 925-335-1553 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 16 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Honoring Deputy Sheriff William R. Johnson who died in the line of duty on July 31, 1852. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/186 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2019/186 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2019/186 Honoring Deputy Sheriff William R. Johnson who died in the line of duty on July 31, 1852. WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff was notified regarding the discovery of historical documents reporting a line of duty death of an “Office of the Sheriff” deputy in the year 1852. WHEREAS, a review of the historical documents, coupled with further research, supported the initial findings and provided further insight into the circumstances surrounding the death of Deputy William R. Johnson. WHEREAS, Deputy William R. Johnson lost his life in the line of duty on July 31, 1852 while serving a “writ of ejection” at a residence unlawfully occupied by the suspect. Johnson was shot in the chest by the suspect and succumbed to his injuries at the scene. WHEREAS, Deputy William R. Johnson died at the age of 34, leaving a wife and three children and was buried in Yerba Buena Cemetery in San Francisco. WHEREAS, facts of Deputy William R. Johnson’s death are supported by archival newspaper articles, official court documents, mortuary documents, and original Grand Jury transcripts of eight witnesses statements (courtesy of the Contra Costa County Historical Society). WHEREAS, historical documents confirm that Deputy William R. Johnson was acting under the color of authority on the date of his death, as a sworn deputy sheriff of the Contra Costa County Office of the Sheriff. WHEREAS, Deputy Johnson was formally inducted into the National Law Enforcement Memorial in Washington D.C. on May 13, 2019 and has been accepted by the California Peace Officer’s Memorial in Sacramento and scheduled for formal induction in May of 2020. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County recognize and honor the sacrifice Deputy William R. Johnson made as a lawman in the old west, while serving and protecting the people of Contra Costa County. ___________________ JOHN GIOIA Chair, District I Supervisor ______________________________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN DIANE BURGIS District II Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy C.16 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lia Bristol, (925) 521-7100 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 17 To:Board of Supervisors From:Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Honoring Dr. Colleen Dowd on her Retirement from Walnut Acres Elementary School AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/201 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2019/201 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2019/201 Honoring Dr. Colleen Dowd on her retirement from Walnut Acres Elementary School Whereas, Dr. Colleen Dowd has served at Walnut Acres Elementary School in Walnut Creek for eleven years; and Whereas, during this time her focus has been to shift from a traditional teacher-focused classroom to a student-owned learning environment, an environment in which teachers provide differentiated, engaging learning experiences that include student choice and student voice; and Whereas, her goal has been to motivate students, build a growth mindset, teach design-thinking, infuse technology to support innovation, and encourage students to own their own learning now and as life-long learners; and Whereas, maintaining a creative arts program in the areas of visual, dramatic, and musical arts is part of that effort; and Whereas, Dr. Dowd and Walnut Acres promote content mastery, collaboration, communication, global citizenship, critical thinking and creativity through instructional strategies that support cognitive and social emotional growth; and Whereas, Dr. Dowd has encouraged and supported parents to be a partner in their children’s education; and Whereas, Dr. Dowd has worked with teachers and parents to best support student learning; and Whereas, her goal has been to provide each of her students with a foundation of academic and social confidence in their basic skills and their ability to tackle new learning; and Whereas, this in turn endows students with a sense of ownership for their own learning; and Whereas, Dr. Dowd encourages students to celebrate their uniqueness while appreciating the differences of others who share their community in our neighborhood and across the globe; and Whereas, Walnut Acres Elementary School was named a California Distinguished School in 2008 and 2014, both during Dr. Dowd’s tenure at Walnut Acres. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County does hereby express its sincere gratitude to Dr. Colleen Dowd for her 11 years of dedicated service to the students, parents and community of Walnut Acres Elementary School and for her extensive service throughout her career to supporting students and families in their education journey. ___________________ JOHN GIOIA Chair, District I Supervisor ______________________________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN DIANE BURGIS District II Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy C.17 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/458 recognizing June 2019 as Elder and Dependent Abuse Awareness Month, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 18 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse Awareness Month AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/458 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2019/458 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2019/458 Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse Awareness Month WHEREAS, older Adults deserve to be treated with respect and dignity to enable them to serve as leaders, mentors, volunteers and vital participating members of our communities; and WHEREAS, as our population lives longer, we are presented with an opportunity to think about our collective needs and future as a nation; and WHEREAS, ageism and social isolation are major causes of elder abuse in the United States; and WHEREAS, recognizing that it is up to all of us to ensure that proper social structures exist so people can retain community and societal connections, reducing the likelihood of abuse; and WHEREAS, preventing abuse of older adults through maintaining and improving societal supports like senior centers, human services and transportation all allow everyone to continue to live as independently as possible and contribute to the life and vibrancy of our communities; and WHEREAS, where there is justice there can be no abuse; therefore, Contra Costa County, Employment and Human Services, Adult Protective Services urges all people to restore justice by honoring older adults, joining our engaging and empowering movement, and putting an end to abuse. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors proclaims and acknowledges the month of June 2019 as Elder and Dependent Adult Abuse Awareness Month and reiterates the importance of supporting those residents with services and programs to keep them safe. ___________________ JOHN GIOIA Chair, District I Supervisor ______________________________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN DIANE BURGIS District II Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy C.18 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Ordinance No. 2019-18 amending the County Ordinance Code to exclude from the Merit System the classification of Deputy Director of Health Service – Exempt. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this request has an annual cost of approximately $450,821, including pension costs of $102,533. The position will be fully funded by Hospital Enterprise Fund I revenues. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting to exclude from the Merit System the classification of Deputy Director of Health Services - Exempt, due to its high level of authority and direct reporting relationship to the Health Services Director. The Deputy Director will work closely with department division heads and program chiefs to ensure the effective and efficient operations of the divisions and programs in alignment with the Department's overall strategic plan. The incumbent is required to possess a high level of knowledge about the operations of divisions in order to act as the liaison between the Health Services Director, senior management, and outside APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jo-Anne Linares, (925) 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: Jo-Anne Linares C. 19 To:Board of Supervisors From:Dianne Dinsmore, Human Resources Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:ADOPT Ordinance No. 2019-18 amending the County Ordinance Code BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) agencies and other County departments. The incumbent will represent the Department at meetings in all levels, participate on various committees and/or boards as directed by the Health Services Director, and be able to assume all duties of the Health Services Director in his/her absence. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Health Services Director will not have adequate high level administrative leadership focused on working with division heads and program chiefs to strategically plan and effectively maintain department operations. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Amended Ordinance Code Section 33-5.313 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Ordinance 2019-18 RECOMMENDATION(S): INTRODUCE Ordinance 2019-17 to exempt accessory dwelling units (ADUs) approved under a ministerial permit from payment of certain transportation impact mitigation fees; WAIVE reading; and FIX June 18, 2019 for adoption. FISCAL IMPACT: The County will incur costs to publish the ordinance pursuant to Government Code section 66018, subdivision (b). The waiving of fees associated with these permits is anticipated to result in the loss of approximately $400,000 per year of revenue but will provide a benefit of approximately 50 additional dwelling units per year. The loss of revenue will be compensated by local road funds and increased efforts to compete for State and Federal Transportation funds. (100% Local Road Funds) APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Mary Halle, 925.313.2327 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: C. 20 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Introduce Ordinance No 2019-17 to exempt payment of certain transportation impact fees for accessory dwelling units and FIX June 18, 2019 for adoption BACKGROUND: At the March 26, 2019 Board of Supervisors (BOS) Meeting, an agenda item related to the update of the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC) developer fee program resulted in dialogue amongst Board members related to encouraging the development of ADUs in response to the housing crisis. The Board requested that staff research a potential process to encourage the development of ADUs. At the April 10, 2019 BOS meeting, staff’s follow up report to the Board indicated the potential to implement an umbrella ordinance that could ease fee collections for ADUs across certain traffic fee programs throughout the county. This action was discussed again at the April 24th BOS meeting when the ordinance, related to the update to the WCCTAC fee program, provided for waiving fees on ADUs that are ministerial actions for an internal conversion ADU. At the April 24th meeting, Board members again expressed their desire to relieve fees for this type of residential housing as it is one method to address the housing crisis with limited cost, time and impact. The introduction of Ordinance 2019-17 is the first step to implementing the exemption of traffic fees on ADUs for all local Area of Benefit (AOB) transportation mitigation fee programs and for Tri-Valley Transportation Council (TVTC) regional transportation fee program where the TVTC Council has already directed staff to move forward with an exemption for ministerial ADUs. The proposed ordinance and related fee exemption is introduced with this board item and will be presented to the Board for adoption at the June 18, 2019 BOS meeting. Staff estimated the potential fiscal impact of this action based upon the assumption that the rate of ADU construction would remain consistent with the rate of permits issued for ADUs during 2017 and 2018. During this two year period, over 90 ADU permits were issued across the County. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Board does not approve the introduction of Ordinance 2019-17, the item cannot move forward to adoption. ATTACHMENTS Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. 2019-17 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2019-17 (Uncodified) (Exempting Ministerially-Approved ADUs from Transportation Mitigation Fees) The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County ordains as follows: SECTION 1. Summary and Purpose. This ordinance exempts accessory dwelling units approved under a ministerial permit from paying area of benefit fees and certain regional transportation mitigation fees. SECTION 2. Definition. As used in this ordinance, the term “accessory dwelling unit,” or “ADU,” has the same meaning as “accessory dwelling unit” set forth in Government Code section 65852.2. SECTION 3. Exempting ADUs from payment of transportation mitigation fees. (a) An accessory dwelling unit that is approved by a ministerial permit issued under Chapter 82-24 of the Ordinance Code is exempt from payment of fees listed in Section 5 (Section V) of Ordinance Nos. 91-27 (Richmond/El Sobrante Area of Benefit), 93-21 (West County Regional Area of Benefit), 93-22 (Central County Regional Area of Benefit), 96-27 (South County Area of Benefit), 2013-26 (East County Regional Area of Benefit), 2015-11 (Tri-Valley Transportation Development Area of Benefit), 2016-12 (Bethel Island Area of Benefit), 2016-18 (Bay Point Area of Benefit), 2016-25 (Alamo Area of Benefit), 2017-22 (North Richmond Area of Benefit), and 2018-16 (Discovery Bay Area of Benefit). (b) An accessory dwelling unit that is approved by a ministerial permit issued under Chapter 82-24 of the Ordinance Code is exempt from payment of a fee under Section 4 (Section IV) of Ordinance Nos. 86-52 (Pacheco Area of Benefit), 94-72 (South Walnut Creek Area of Benefit), 95-32 (Central County Area of Benefit), 95- 37 (West County Area of Benefit), 95-38 (Martinez Area of Benefit), and 2000-24 (Dublin/Contra Costa Fee Area). ORDINANCE NO. 2019-17 2 SECTION 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective 30 days after passage, and, within 15 days of passage, this ordinance shall be published once, with the names of the Supervisors voting for and against it, in the East Bay Times, a newspaper of general circulation published in this County. PASSED on ___________________________ by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: DAVID J. TWA ____________________________ Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Board Chair and County Administrator By: ____________________________ [SEAL] Deputy SMS H:\Client Matters\Public Works\AOB Fees\ADU Exemption\Ordinance No. 2019-17 (ADU Exemption).docx RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Ordinance No. 2019-19 to repeal Ordinance No. 2019-13, which had authorized a special tax for police protection services in County Service Area P-2, Zone A, Blackhawk area. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. The proposed ballot measure has already been removed from the August 27, 2019 mail ballot through Board action on May 30, 2019. Today's action formally repeals the ordinance that was to be proposed to the voters within CSA P-2A (Blackhawk). BACKGROUND: On May 21, 2019, the Board of Supervisors adopted Ordinance No. 2019-13. Under the ordinance, beginning in fiscal year 2020-2021, special taxes levied in the Zone for police protection would be increased to $380 per parcel for residential properties (single, small multiple and large multiple), $3,040 per parcel for commercial/industrial/institutional properties and $13,300 per parcel for commercial/theater parcels. The ordinance also would tax parcels owned by the Blackhawk Country Club, which are currently exempt from the Zone A police protection special tax. Also APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Mark Goodwin, 925-252-4500 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: C. 21 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Withdrawal of Special Tax Measure in CSA P-2A from the August 27, 2019 Ballot BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) on May 21, 2019, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2019/147, which directed Ordinance No. 2019-13 to be presented to the CSA P-2 Zone A voters in a mail ballot election on August 27, 2019. Elections Code section 9605 authorizes the Board of Supervisors to adopt a resolution withdrawing a measure from the ballot if the resolution is adopted and filed with the Elections Office no less than 83 days before the election. On May 30, 2019, the Board adopted Resolution No. 2019/191 which ordered Ordinance No. 2019-13 to be withdrawn from the August 27, 2019, ballot and canceled the election on the special tax measure in CSA P-2A. Resolution No. 2019/191 took effect immediately upon adoption by the Board. At the same time, Ordinance No. 2019-19, which repeals Ordinance No. 2019-13, was introduced and adoption was fixed for June 11, 2019. Today's action adopts Ordinance 2019-19 finalizing the repeal of Ordinance No. 2019-13. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Ordinance will not be formally repealed. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No impact. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Ordinance No. 2019-19 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Ordinance 2019-19 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the resignation of David Dolter, DECLARE a vacancy in the Appointee 6 Seat on the Alamo Police Services Advisory Committee, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, for a term with an expiration date of December 31, 2020, as recommended by Supervisor Candace Andersen. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE BACKGROUND: Established on November 18, 1969, by Board Resolution 69/765, the purpose of the County Service Area P-2B Citizens Advisory Committee is to advise the Board of Supervisors and the Sheriff's Department on the needs of the Alamo community for extended police services which shall include, but not be limited to, enforcement of the State Vehicle Code, crime prevention, and litter control. On March 19, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved a Board Order that retitled the County Service Area P-2B Citizens Advisory Committee to the "Alamo Police Services Advisory Committee". APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jill Ray, 925-957-8860 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Appointee, District 2 Supervisor, Maddy Book, APSAC C. 22 To:Board of Supervisors From:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:RESIGNATION FROM THE ALAMO POLICE SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Alamo Police Services Advisory Committee is comprised of nine regular members and two alternates who each serve a two year term. Mr. Dolter has moved from the area and is no longer eligible to serve on APSAC. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: NONE RECOMMENDATION(S): REAPPOINT Richard Bell to the District 1 seat on the Family & Children's Trust Committee to a term ending 9/30/2021. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Mr. Bell has been serving successfully and Supervisor Gioia wishes to reappoint him. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: James Lyons, 510-231-8692 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 23 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Reappoint Richard Bell to the District 1 seat of the Family & Children's Trust Committee RECOMMENDATION(S): ACKNNOWLEDGE that Resolution 2017/225 designated Supervisor Federal D. Glover as the Board of Supervisors representative, and Supervisor John Gioia as the Board's alternate representative, to the Marin Energy Authority (MCE) Board of Directors. Supervisor John Gioia and Supervisor Federal D. Glover choose to switch their positions on the Marin Energy Authority (MCE). 1. Therefore, APPOINT Supervisor John Gioia as the Board of Supervisors representative, and Supervisor Federal D. Glover as the Board's alternate representative, to the Marin Energy Authority (MCE) Board of Directors with a term expiring December 31, 2019. 2. ACKNOWLEDGE that the Board of Supervisors adopted a policy on Board Member Committee Assignments on March 21, 2000. 3. ACKNOWLEDGE that adoption of a new Master Resolution with a complete roster of all appointments is required by Board policy whenever terms expire or new appointments are made. 4. 5. ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/180 appointing Board members and other individuals to serve on Board committees, special county committees, and regional boards/ committees/commissions for 2019, some of which include additional compensation in the form of a stipend. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jami Napier, (925) 335-1908 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 24 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Board of Supervisors Appointments to the Marin Energy Authority (MCE) Board of Directors 6. RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) INDICATE that this Resolution No. 2019/180 supersedes in its entirety Resolution No. 2019/12, which was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 15, 2019. RESOLVE that Board Members as named are APPOINTED to serve on Board committees, special county committees and regional boards/ committees/ commissions as specified on Attachment I to Resolution No. 2019/180 as Internal Standing Committees (Type I), Other Internal Committees, (Type II), Regional Bodies (Type III), Special/Restricted Seats (Type IV), and Ad Hoc Committees (Type V). 7. DIRECT staff to update, if necessary, the County website a single Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Form 806, which lists all the paid appointed positions on committees, boards, or commissions for members of the Board of Supervisors. 8. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the County from this action. BACKGROUND: On June 6, 2017, the Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance and resolution to join the Marin Energy Authority's (MCE) community choice energy/aggregation program (CCE). CCE involves cities, counties, or a joint powers authority composed of cities and/or counties, pooling ("aggregating") retail electricity customers for the purpose of procuring and selling electricity. MCE's formation document specifies that the Authority shall be governed by a Board of Directors composed of one representative of each of the member agencies. The governing body of each member agency will appoint from its governing body one Director and, also, one alternate who may vote on all matters when the regular Director is absent for a Board meeting. The County's Director and Alternate Director will serve at the pleasure of the Board of Supervisors. The MCE formation document sets no seat terms for MCE board members. The County's appointments and their duration are completely within the discretion of the Board of Supervisors. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Supervisor Federal D. Glover will remain as the Board of Supervisors representative, and Supervisor John Gioia as the Board’s alternate representative. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/180 Attachment to Resolution No. 2019/180: BOS Committee Assignments for 2019 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2019/180 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/180 IN THE MATTER OF MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO THE MARIN ENERGY AUTHORITY BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND UPDATING BOARD MEMBER ASSIGNMENTS TO 2019 BOARD COMMITTEES, SPECIAL COUNTY COMMITTEES, AND REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS WHEREAS on June 6, 2017, the Board of Supervisors adopted an ordinance and resolution to join the Marin Energy Authority's (MCE) community choice energy/aggregation program; and WHEREAS, MCE requires each member agency to appoint from its governing body one Director and, also, one alternate who may vote on all matters when the regular Director is absent for a Board meeting, and who both serve at the pleasure of the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS the County's appointments to MCE and their duration are completely within the discretion of the Board of Supervisors; and WHEREAS annual reassignment of the County's MCE seats might be disruptive, yet the appointments should not be for an indefinite period; and WHEREAS adoption of a new Master Resolution with a complete roster of all appointments is required by Board policy whenever terms expire or new appointments are made; and WHEREAS, after any new appointments or reappointments are made, when there is a change in compensation for any appointment, or where there is a change in the number of meetings of the board or committee to which an appointment is made, the Fair Political Practices Commission requires the County to update and post on the County’s website the County’s Report of Public Official Appointments, Form 806; NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS RESOLVES TO: 1. APPOINT Supervisor John Gioia as the Board of Supervisors representative, and Supervisor Federal D. Glover as the Board's alternate representative, to the Marin Energy Authority (MCE) Board of Directors for an initial term ending on December 31, 2019 2. APPOINT the Board members and other individuals to serve on Board committees, special county committees and regional boards / committees / commissions as specified in the Master List (see Attachment II) as Type I for Board Standing Committees, Type II for Other Internal Committees, Type III for Regional Bodies, Type IV for Special/Restricted seats, and Type V for Board Ad Hoc Committees. 3. INDICATE that this Resolution No. 2019/180 supersedes in its entirety Resolution No. 2019/12, which was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on January 15, 2019. 4. UPDATE the County's Report of Public Official Appointments, Form 806, if necessary, to reflect the appointments on the adopted Master List for 2017 and post it on the County's website. Contact: Jami Napier, (925) 335-1908 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: ATTACHMENT I TO RESOLUTION NO. 2019/180CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS(Sorted by Committee Type)Type*Committee NameTerm ExpirationAppointeeStipend InformationI Airport Committee, Chair12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDI Airport Committee, Vice Chair12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDI Family & Human Services Committee, Chair12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDI Family & Human Services Committee, Vice Chair12/31/2019 John GioiaNO STIPENDI Finance Committee, Chair12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDI Finance Committee, Vice Chair12/31/2019 John GioiaNO STIPENDI Hiring Outreach & Oversight Committee, Chair12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDI Hiring Outreach & Oversight Committee, Vice‐Chair12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDI Internal Operations Committee, Chair12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDI Internal Operations Committee, Vice Chair12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDI Legislation Committee, Chair12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDI Legislation Committee, Vice Chair12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDI Public Protection, Chair12/31/2019 John GioiaNO STIPENDI Public Protection, Vice Chair12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDI Sustainability Committee, Chair12/31/2019 John GioiaNO STIPENDNote: Type I: Internal Standing Committees; Type II: Internal Appointments; Type III: Regional Appointments; Type IV: Special/Restricted Appointments; Type V: Ad Hoc CommitteesPage 1June 11, 2019 ATTACHMENT I TO RESOLUTION NO. 2019/180CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS(Sorted by Committee Type)Type*Committee NameTerm ExpirationAppointeeStipend InformationI Sustainability Committee, Vice Chair12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDI Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee, Chair12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDI Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee, Vice Chair12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDII Bay Area Counties Caucus12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDII Bay Area Counties Caucus, Alternate12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDII Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications System (BayRICS) Authority12/31/2019 Mike CastenNO STIPENDII BayRICS Authority, Alternate12/31/2019 Elise WarrenNO STIPENDII California Identification System Remote Access Network Board (Cal‐ID RAN Board)12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDII Central Contra Costa Solid Waste AuthorityUnspecified Candace AndersenSTIPEND of $50/meeting; max of 2 paid/monthII Central Contra Costa Solid Waste AuthorityUnspecified Karen MitchoffSTIPEND of $50/meeting; max of 2 paid/monthII Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance12/31/2020 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDII Contra Costa Health Plan Joint Conference Committee12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDII Contra Costa Health Plan Joint Conference Committee12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDII Dougherty Valley Oversight Committee12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDII Dougherty Valley Oversight Committee12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDNote: Type I: Internal Standing Committees; Type II: Internal Appointments; Type III: Regional Appointments; Type IV: Special/Restricted Appointments; Type V: Ad Hoc CommitteesPage 2June 11, 2019 ATTACHMENT I TO RESOLUTION NO. 2019/180CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS(Sorted by Committee Type)Type*Committee NameTerm ExpirationAppointeeStipend InformationII East Bay Regional Communication System (EBRCS) Authority Governing Board12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDII East Bay Regional Communication System (EBRCS) Authority Governing Board, Alternate12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDII East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy, Governing Board12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDII East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy, Governing Board, Alternate12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDII East Contra Costa Regional Fee & Finance Authority12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDII East Contra Costa Regional Fee & Finance Authority, Alternate12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDII East County Water Management Association12/31/2020 Diane BurgisSTIPEND of $170/meeting; max 6 per monthII East County Water Management Association, Alternate12/31/2020 Federal GloverSTIPEND of $170/meeting; max 6 per monthII eBART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) Partnership Policy Advisory Committee12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDII eBART (Bay Area Rapid Transit) Partnership Policy Advisory Committee12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDII First 5 Children and Families Commission Alternate Member12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDII First 5 Children and Families Commission Member12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDII Hazardous Waste Management Facility Allocation CommitteeUnspecified Candace AndersenSTIPEND of $150 per meeting. II Hazardous Waste Management Facility Allocation Committee, AlternateUnspecified Karen MitchoffSTIPEND of $150 per meeting. II Kensington Solid Waste Committee Alternate12/31/2019 Kate RauchNO STIPENDNote: Type I: Internal Standing Committees; Type II: Internal Appointments; Type III: Regional Appointments; Type IV: Special/Restricted Appointments; Type V: Ad Hoc CommitteesPage 3June 11, 2019 ATTACHMENT I TO RESOLUTION NO. 2019/180CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS(Sorted by Committee Type)Type*Committee NameTerm ExpirationAppointeeStipend InformationII Kensington Solid Waste Committee Member12/31/2019 John GioiaNO STIPENDII Medical Services Joint Conference Committee, Chair12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDII Medical Services Joint Conference Committee, Vice Chair12/31/2019 John GioiaNO STIPENDII North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Committee12/31/2019 John GioiaNO STIPENDII North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Committee, Alternate12/31/2019 Robert RogersNO STIPENDII Open Space/Parks & East Bay Regional Parks District Liaison Committee, Chair12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDII Open Space/Parks & East Bay Regional Parks District Liaison Committee, Vice Chair12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDII Pleasant Hill BART/Contra Costa Centre Joint Powers Authority Board of TrusteesUnspecified Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDII Pleasant Hill BART/Contra Costa Centre Joint Powers Authority Board of TrusteesUnspecified Candace AndersenNO STIPENDII State Route 4 Bypass Authority12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDII State Route 4 Bypass Authority, Alternate12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDII SWAT (Southwest Area Transportation Committee)12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDII SWAT, Alternate12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDII TRAFFIX (Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency)12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDII TRAFFIX (Measure J Traffic Congestion Relief Agency), Alternate12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDNote: Type I: Internal Standing Committees; Type II: Internal Appointments; Type III: Regional Appointments; Type IV: Special/Restricted Appointments; Type V: Ad Hoc CommitteesPage 4June 11, 2019 ATTACHMENT I TO RESOLUTION NO. 2019/180CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS(Sorted by Committee Type)Type*Committee NameTerm ExpirationAppointeeStipend InformationII TRANSPAC (Central County Transportation Partnership and Cooperation)12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDII TRANSPAC, Alternate12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDII TRANSPLAN (East County Transportation Planning)12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDII TRANSPLAN, Alternate12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDII Tri‐Valley Transportation Council12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDII Urban Counties of California12/31/2019 Federal D. GloverNO STIPENDII Urban Counties of California, Alternate12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDII WCCTAC (West County Transportation Advisory Committee)12/31/2019 John GioiaNO STIPENDII WCCTAC, Alternate12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDII West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management AuthorityUnspecified John GioiaSTIPEND of $50 per meeting. II West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management Authority, AlternateUnspecified Federal GloverSTIPEND of $50 per meeting. III Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board of Directors1/20/2020Karen MitchoffPer diem of $100/meeting + travel exp; max $6,000III Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board of Directors6/17/2021 John GioiaPer diem of $100/meeting + travel exp; max $6,000III Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (CCCTA) Board of Directors5/1/2019 Candace AndersenSTIPEND of $100 per meeting; up to $200 monthIII Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (CCCTA) Board of Directors, Alternate5/1/2019 Karen MitchoffSTIPEND of $100 per meeting; up to $200 monthNote: Type I: Internal Standing Committees; Type II: Internal Appointments; Type III: Regional Appointments; Type IV: Special/Restricted Appointments; Type V: Ad Hoc CommitteesPage 5June 11, 2019 ATTACHMENT I TO RESOLUTION NO. 2019/180CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS(Sorted by Committee Type)Type*Committee NameTerm ExpirationAppointeeStipend InformationIII Contra Costa Transportation Authority Board of Commissioners (Seat 1)1/31/2021 Federal D. GloverSTIPEND of $100 per meeting; up to $400 monthIII Contra Costa Transportation Authority Board of Commissioners (Seat 2)1/31/2020 Karen MitchoffSTIPEND of $100 per meeting; up to $400 monthIII Contra Costa Transportation Authority Board of Commissioners, Alternate (Seat 1)1/31/2021 Candace AndersenSTIPEND of $100 per meeting; up to $400 monthIII Contra Costa Transportation Authority Board of Commissioners, Alternate (Seat 2)1/31/2020 John GioiaSTIPEND of $100 per meeting; up to $400 monthIII Contra Costa Transportation Authority Board of Commissioners, Second Alternate (Seat 1)1/31/2021 John GioiaSTIPEND of $100 per meeting; up to $400 monthIII Contra Costa Transportation Authority Board of Commissioners, Third Alternate (Seat 1)1/31/2021 Diane BurgisSTIPEND of $100 per meeting; up to $400 monthIII Local Agency Formation Commission5/2/2022 Candace AndersenSTIPEND of $150 per meeting. III Local Agency Formation Commission5/2/2022 Federal D. GloverSTIPEND of $150 per meeting. III Local Agency Formation Commission, Alternate5/4/2020 Diane BurgisSTIPEND of $150 per meeting. III Marin Energy Authority (MCE) Board of Directors12/31/2019 John GioiaNO STIPENDIII Marin Energy Authority (MCE) Board of Directors, Alternate12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDIII Metropolitan Transportation Commission2/1/2023 Federal GloverSTIPEND of $100/meeting; up to $500/month per agency.III Tri Delta Transit Authority, Board of Directors (Seat 1)12/31/2020 Federal GloverSTIPEND of $100/monthIII Tri Delta Transit Authority, Board of Directors (Seat 2)12/31/2019 Diane BurgisSTIPEND of $100/monthIII WCC Healtcare District Finance Committee12/31/2019 Federal GloverNO STIPENDNote: Type I: Internal Standing Committees; Type II: Internal Appointments; Type III: Regional Appointments; Type IV: Special/Restricted Appointments; Type V: Ad Hoc CommitteesPage 6June 11, 2019 ATTACHMENT I TO RESOLUTION NO. 2019/180CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS(Sorted by Committee Type)Type*Committee NameTerm ExpirationAppointeeStipend InformationIII WCC Healtcare District Finance Committee12/31/2019 John GioiaNO STIPENDIII CCTA, Community Based Trasnportation Steering Committee Unspecified Federal Glover NO STIPENDIV ABAG Executive Board (Seat 1)6/30/2020 Karen MitchoffSTIPEND of $150 per meeting. IV ABAG Executive Board (Seat 2)6/30/2020 Candace AndersenSTIPEND of $150 per meeting. IV ABAG Executive Board, Alternate 16/30/2020 John GioiaSTIPEND of $150 per meeting. IV ABAG Executive Board, Alternate 26/30/2020 Diane BurgisSTIPEND of $150 per meeting. IV ABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corporations Board of Directors and its Executive Committee 12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDIVABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corporations Board of Directors and its Executive Committee, First Alternate12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDIVABAG Finance Authority for Nonprofit Corporations Board of Directors and its Executive Committee, Second Alternate12/31/2019 Russell WattsNO STIPENDIV ABAG General Assembly12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDIV ABAG General Assembly, Alternate12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDIV ABAG Regional Planning CommitteeUnspecified Karen MitchoffSTIPEND of $150 per meeting. IV Bay Conservation & Development CommissionUnspecified John GioiaSTIPEND of $100 per meeting; max of 4 meetings.IV Bay Conservation & Development Commission, AlternateUnspecified Federal GloverSTIPEND of $100 per meeting; max of 4 meetings.IV CCCERA (Contra Costa County Employees Retirement Association) Board of Trustees6/30/2020 Candace AndersenSTIPEND of $100 per meeting.Note: Type I: Internal Standing Committees; Type II: Internal Appointments; Type III: Regional Appointments; Type IV: Special/Restricted Appointments; Type V: Ad Hoc CommitteesPage 7June 11, 2019 ATTACHMENT I TO RESOLUTION NO. 2019/180CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS(Sorted by Committee Type)Type*Committee NameTerm ExpirationAppointeeStipend InformationIV Contra Costa Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight BoardUnspecified Federal GloverNO STIPENDIV Contra Costa Countywide Redevelopment Successor Agency Oversight BoardUnspecified Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDIV CSAC (California State Association of Counties) Board of Directors11/30/2019 John GioiaNO STIPENDIV CSAC Board of Directors, Alternate11/30/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDIV Delta Diablo Sanitation District Governing Board12/31/2019 Federal GloverSTIPEND of $170 per meeting; max of 6 meetings.IV Delta Diablo Sanitation District Governing Board, Alternate12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffSTIPEND of $170 per meeting; max of 6 meetings.IV Delta Protection Commission12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDIV Delta Protection Commission, Alternate12/31/2019 Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDIV Law Library Board of Trustees 12/31/2019 Nolan Armstrong NO STIPENDIV Mental Health Commission12/31/2019 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDIV Mental Health Commission, Alternate12/31/2019 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDIV Sacramento‐San Joaquin Delta Conservancy BoardUnspecified Karen MitchoffNO STIPENDIV Sacramento‐San Joaquin Delta Conservancy Board, AlternateUnspecified Diane BurgisNO STIPENDV Census 2020 , Vice Chair 12/31/2020 Candace AndersenNO STIPENDV Census 2020, Chair12/31/2020 Diane BurgisNO STIPENDNote: Type I: Internal Standing Committees; Type II: Internal Appointments; Type III: Regional Appointments; Type IV: Special/Restricted Appointments; Type V: Ad Hoc CommitteesPage 8June 11, 2019 ATTACHMENT I TO RESOLUTION NO. 2019/180CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS(Sorted by Committee Type)Type*Committee NameTerm ExpirationAppointeeStipend InformationV Childhood Asthma Ad Hoc Committee, Chair Unspecified John GioiaNO STIPENDV Childhood Asthma Ad Hoc Committee, Vice ChairUnspecified Federal GloverNO STIPENDV Industrial Safety Ordinance/Community Warning System Ad Hoc CommitteeUnspecified John GioiaNO STIPENDV Industrial Safety Ordinance/Community Warning System Ad Hoc CommitteeUnspecified Federal GloverNO STIPENDV Northern Waterfront Economic Development Ad Hoc CommitteeUnspecified Federal GloverNO STIPENDV Northern Waterfront Economic Development Ad Hoc CommitteeUnspecified Diane BurgisNO STIPENDNote: Type I: Internal Standing Committees; Type II: Internal Appointments; Type III: Regional Appointments; Type IV: Special/Restricted Appointments; Type V: Ad Hoc CommitteesPage 9June 11, 2019 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the following At Large appointments to the Sustainability Commission for the terms identified below, as recommended by the Sustainability Committee: *Environmental Justice seat: Doria Robinson, through March 31, 2023 *Community Group seat #2: Howdy Goudey, through March 31, 2023 *Business Group seat #1: Russell Driver, through March 31, 2021 *Business Group seat #2: Nick Snyder, through March 31, 2023 AUTHORIZE all appointments to the Sustainability Commission to extend 60 days past the stated term of service, or until a new appointment is made, whichever occurs sooner, as recommended by the Sustainability Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: None. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jody London (926) 674-7871 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 25 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:At-Large Appointments to the Sustainability Commission BACKGROUND: On November 15, 2016, the Board of Supervisors (board) approved the creation of a Contra Costa County Sustainability Commission. The function of the Sustainability Commission is to: *Advise the Board on opportunities to realize equity and fairness across the diverse communities of Contra Costa County in sustainability programs that support the Climate Action Plan. *Provide suggestions to staff and the Board on how to better engage Contra Costa County residents and businesses on sustainability issues and implementation of the Climate Action Plan. *Provide advice to staff and the Board on successful implementation of the Climate Action Plan, including suggestions on how that work can be performed more efficiently and effectively. The Sustainability Commission has eleven members and five alternates members, selected as follows: *Five District representatives and five alternates nominated by individual members of the Board of Supervisors (representatives and alternates must be a resident of that district); *Two members representing community groups whose mission includes sustainability and/or environmental issues; *Two members representing commercial groups or organizations whose business focuses on sustainability and/or environmental issues; and *One member representing environmental justice issues and who lives in a disadvantaged community. The terms for each At-Large seat were established by the Board when it made initial appointments to the Sustainability Commission on March 14, 2017. The terms of the appointments were staggered to maintain continuity on the Sustainability Commission. The following At-Large seats expired on March 31, 2019: At-Large, Environmental Justice; At-Large, Community Group, Seat #2; At-Large, Business Group, Seat #2. The opportunity to submit applications for these seats was advertised by the Clerk of the Board and Department of Conservation and Development starting January 24, 2019. Applications were accepted through February 22, 2019. Additionally, on February 25, 2019, the individual in the At-Large, Business Group, Seat #1 resigned. This position was declared vacant on March 12, 2019. The position was advertised by the Clerk of the Board and Department of Conservation and Development. Applications were accepted through April 29, 2019. Nine people timely submitted applications to serve in the vacant At-Large seats described above. Three are eligible for seats representing community groups; one of those is an incumbent. Five are eligible for seats representing business; one is of those is an incumbent. One is eligible for the seat representing environmental justice; she is the incumbent. Two additional applications were denied, one because the applicant did not meet the criteria for the At-Large seats, and one because the applicant was applying for a seat for which the application period had closed. Attachment A shows the current members of the Sustainability Commission. Attachment B shows the applicants sorted by eligibility for At-Large seats. Attachment C is a summary of the applications. Attachment D is all the eligible applications received by the Clerk of the Board, with personal contact information redacted. Applicants eligible for appointment to the vacant At-Large seats for community groups and business groups were invited to an interview with the Sustainability Committee on May 6, 2019. The sole applicant for the At-Large, Environmental Justice seat was the incumbent, who was interviewed by the Committee in 2017 and therefore was not required to interview again. The Committee interviewed the following individuals: *Andrew Chahrour *Howdy Goudey *Janette Drew *Russell Driver *Luis Ramirez-Agudelo *Nicholas Snyder *Benjuamin Lee One applicant for the At-Large, Business seats was unable to attend the interview. The Sustainability Committee recommends that the Board of Supervisors make the following at-large appointments to the Sustainability Commission, with the noted terms of service: *Environmental Justice seat: Doria Robinson, through March 31, 2023 *Community Group seat #2: Howdy Goudey, through March 31, 2023 *Business Group seat #1: Russell Driver, through March 31, 2021 *Business Group seat #2: Nick Snyder, through March 31, 2023 The Sustainability Committee also recommends that the Board of Supervisors authorize all appointments to the Sustainability Commission to extend 60 days past the stated term of service, or until a new appointment is made, whichever occurs sooner. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the recommendations are not approved, At-Large appointments will not be made to the Sustainability Commission. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: While this is not a direct service program for children and youth up to the age of 18, the goals of the Climate Action Plan have a direct impact on outcome 5 in the Children’s Report Card: Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families. The Sustainability Commission provides advice to the Board that can improve environmental conditions for children and their parents and caregivers in Contra Costa County. ATTACHMENTS Sustainability Commission Applicants Sorted by At-Large Seat Sustainability Commission Applicants as of April 29, 2019 Sustainability Commission Membership Roster as of April 29, 2019 Sustainability Commission Applications, Redacted Contra Costa County Sustainability Commission Applicants, Sorted by Eligibility for Appointment May 6, 2019 At-Large Appointments Community Group (1 Seats) Business (2 Seats) Environmental Justice (1 Seat) Education or Research Institution (no vacancy at this time) 1 Chahrour, Andrew (El Sobrante; Planting Justice, Clean Water Components) Driver, Russell (Moraga: ARC Alternatives) Robinson, Doria (Richmond; Urban Tilth) 2 Goudey, Howdy (El Cerrito; Contra Costa County Sustainability Commission, Environmental Quality Cmte, El Cerrito Cmty Garden Network, Earthcare Now) Luis Ramirez-Agudelo (Walnut Creek; Sol Energy Consulting) 3 Drew, Janette (Walnut Creek; Sustainable Contra Costa) Snyder, Nicholas (Lafayette; Tierra Resource Consultants) 4 Balanchandran, Nik (Walnut Creek; Zabble, Inc.) 5 Lee, Benjamin (Pleasant Hill; Downey Brand) 1 SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION APPLICANTS - Applications received as of February 22, 2019 for At-Large, Business Seat #1, Community Seat #1, and Enviromental Justice, and Applications received as of April 29, 2019 for At-Large, Business Seat #2. NAME DISTRICT INCUMBENT?CITY EDUCATION CURRENT EMPLOYER POSITION VOLUNTEER ACTIVITY/AFFILIATIONS MEMBER SEAT REQUESTING EXPERIENCE CLIMATE ACTION PLAN AREA(S) OF EXPERTISE* POSSIBLE MEMBERSHIP DESIGNATION** Driver, Russell 2 No Moraga · Stanford University, Urban Studies · UCLA, Transportation Policy ARC Alternatives (San Francisco) Principal, Co- Founder Not Specified At-Large, Business Over 20 years experience in energy, economic analysis, program management, and consulting. Expertise in renewable energy and energy efficiency projects and programs. Energy Efficiency, Renewable Energy At-Large, Business Ramirez-Agudelo, Luis 4 No Walnut Creek B.A. Architecture, New York Institute of Technology Sol Energy Consulting Sales Director Leo Club, American Institute of Architects, Walnut Creek Rotary At-Large, Business Studied architecture and has been in sales for 30 years, the last ten in soalr. Understands there are many components to energy independence. Works with both residential and commercial clients to lower dependence on local utilities. Energy At-Large, Business Snyder, Nicholas 2 Yes Lafayette B.A Economics Tierra Resource Consultants Energy Management Consultant Contra Costa County Sustainability Commission At-Large, Business Strategic planning for utiltiies and local governments regarding deisgn, implementation, and financing of distributed energy resources programs. Energy Efficiency, Transportation, Land Use At-Large, Business Balachandran, Nik 2 No Walnut Creek M.S. Electrical Engineering B.S. Electrical Engineering New Mexico State Univ Zabble Inc. CoFounder and CEO Conducted annual beach cleanups for over 10 years with Surfrider Foundation, Port of Oakland, City of Berkeley. Visit elders with Little Brothers Friends of Elders.At-Large, Business Board member of the Northern California Recycling Association (NCRA); zero waste tech startup entrepreneur.Solid Waste At-Large, Business Lee, Benjamin 4 No Pleasant Hill B.A. Political Science, UCLA J.D., University of Virgina Law School Downey Brand Senior Associate Jones Day Pro Bono Panel (2016-2017); Board of Directors, Concord Child Care Center (2015); Federal Pro Bono Panel, Walnut Creek, CA (2013-2015; Board of Directors, Asian American Pacific Bar Association, Partners, Sacramento, CA (2013); Tennis Instructor, START Program, Sacramento, CA (2013); Volunteer, Reading Thomas of Aquinas Kindergarten Sunday School Teacher (2011); Veterans Medical Disability Appeals Program (2010); Court Appointed Special Advocate (2009-2010); JusticeCorps (2007-2008).At-Large, Business Practicing litigator with nearly ten years of legal experience in diverse matters involving land use, environmental, election, public finance, criminal justice, and water disputes. My clients have included the District of Columbia and several California local public entities, such as the City of Lafayette, East Bay Regional Park District, and the County of Los Angeles. I am well- equipped and deeply desire to help advise the County on legal and policy considerations relating to education, land use, environmental, and economic concerns that are vital to the future of our community.Land use At-Large, Business 2 SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION APPLICANTS - Applications received as of February 22, 2019 for At-Large, Business Seat #1, Community Seat #1, and Enviromental Justice, and Applications received as of April 29, 2019 for At-Large, Business Seat #2. NAME DISTRICT INCUMBENT?CITY EDUCATION CURRENT EMPLOYER POSITION VOLUNTEER ACTIVITY/AFFILIATIONS MEMBER SEAT REQUESTING EXPERIENCE CLIMATE ACTION PLAN AREA(S) OF EXPERTISE* POSSIBLE MEMBERSHIP DESIGNATION** Chahrour, Andrew 1 No El Sobrante Bucknell University, Environmental Science · Planting Justice · Clean Water Components (Do It Yourself greywater kits) · Farm Director · President/CEO None Listed Not Specified Has worked for two organizations that are focused on urban farming. Operate an online retail store of Do It Yourself greywater installation kits. Worked in sustainable agriculture program at UC Berkeley. Intern at various organizaitons focused on land use, environment, and agriculture.Land Use At-Large, Community Drew, Janette 2 No Alamo MBA, Pepperdine University Sustainable Contra Costa Director, Operations Not indicated Not Specified Prior work experience is in trust administration and private banking. At-Large, Community Goudey, Howdy 1 Yes (elected Chair in Feb. 2019)El Cerrito B.S. Engineering Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Scientific Engineering Associate Contra Costa County Sustainability Commission Environmental Quality Committee El Cerrito Community Garden Network Earthcare Now At-Large, Community Group Professional work in energy efficiency (residential and commercial buildings), renewable energy (solar and electric vehicles and charging infrastructure). Community volunteer - participated in development and implementation of city Climate Action Plan on city level; Volunteered hundreds of hours planning, leading. and working on efforts to grow local organic food, remove invasive plants, and restrore native plants and habitats. Energy Efficiency, Land Use At-Large, Community Robinson, Doria 1 Yes Richmond B.A Liberal Studies/Environme ntal Studies Urban Tilth Exec. Director Urban Tilth, Rich City Rides, Cooperation Richmond, Unity Park Design and Transition Committee, Friends of the Richmond Greenway, North Richmond Shoreline Festival 2009, 2010, RichmondSPOKES-Co- founder, Richmond Bike and Pedestrian Planning Committee, Richmond Mayor's Taskforce Environmental Health and Justice Environmental Justice Manages 7 organic urban farms, school and community gardens, nutrition education and watershed restoration. Responsible for strategic planning, program development, crop planning and management and partnership development. Former employee of The Watershed Project Land Use, Water, Education At-Large, Environmental Justice * Areas of expertise identified through review of application materials. ** Suggestion for possible designation based on review of application materials; Board may wish to clarify with applicants if they have a preference, if one was not indicated. • For identification purposes only CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION 30 Muir Road Martinez CA 94553 2019 MEMBERSHIP ROSTER REPRESENTATIVES MEMBERS (ALTERNATES) EXPIRATION Community Group Seat #1 Vacant March 31, 2019 Community Group #2 • Contra Costa Clean Energy Alliance Harry Thurston (lives in D3) March 31, 2019 At-Large, Business Seat #1 Vacant At-Large, Business Seat #2 Vacant March 31, 2019 Environmental Justice Vacant March 31, 2019 Education or Research Institution • UCSF Kimberly Hazard (lives in D1) March 31, 2019 Supervisorial Appointment District 1 Nick Despota Shoshana Wechsler (A) March 31, 2019 March 31, 2019 Supervisorial Appointment District 2 Victoria Smith Ryan Buckley (A) March 31, 2021 March 31, 2021 Supervisorial Appointment District 3 John Sierra Gretchen Logue (A) March 31, 2021 March 31, 2021 Supervisorial Appointment District 4 Wes Sullens Travis Curran (A) March 31, 2019 March 31, 2019 Supervisorial Appointment District 5 Charles Davidson Vacant (A) March 31, 2021 RECOMMENDATION(S): RE-APPOINT Kimberly McCarl to the Private/Non-Profit Sector 2 seat, Monisha Merchant to Private/Non-profit Sector 4 seat, Samuel Houston to Low-Income Sector 1, and Devlyn Sewell to the Private/Non-Profit Sector 5 seat on the Economic Opportunity Council, with term end date of June 30, 2021, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: This board order seeks to re-appoint several current Economic Opportunity Council (EOC) members to new terms set to expire of June 30, 2021. Kimberly McCarl was appointed to this seat on March 19, 2019 to fill a term that ends June 30, 2019. McCarl lives in Concord, California 94519. Monisha Merchant was appointed to this seat on February 12, 2019 to fill a term that ends June 30, 2019. Merchant resides in Concord, CA 94518. Samuel Houston was first appointed to this seat on March 21, 2017 to fill a term that ends June 30, 2019. Houston resides in Concord, CA 94520. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6308 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Nancy Sparks C. 26 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:RE-APPOINTS to the Economic Opportunity Council BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > Devlyn Sewell was first appointed to this seat on March 29, 2016 to fill a remaining term that ends June 30, 2019. Sewell lives in Concord, California 94520. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, the Economic Opportunity Council's ability to conduct routine business will be impaired. ATTACHMENTS McCarl Application Houston Application Sewell Application M. Merchant Application THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT BOARD, COMMITTEE OR COMMISSION NAME AND SEAT TITLE YOU ARE APPLYING FOR: ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ PRINT EXACT NAME OF BOARD, COMMITTEE, OR COMMISSION PRINT EXACT SEAT NAME (if applicable) 5. EDUCATION: Check appropriate box if you possess one of the following: High School Diploma G.E.D. Certificate California High School Proficiency Certificate Give Highest Grade or Educational Level Achieved________________________________________________ Names of colleges / universities attended Course of Study / Major Degree Awarded Units Completed Degree Type Date Degree Awarded Semester Quarter A) Yes No B) Yes No C) Yes No D) Other schools / training completed: Course Studied Hours Completed Certificate Awarded: Yes No For Reviewers Use Only: Accepted Rejected Contra Costa County Contra Costa County CLERK OF THE BOARD 651 Pine Street, Rm. 106 Martinez, California 94553-1292 PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT IN INK (Each Position Requires a Separate Application) BOARDS, COMMITTEES, AND COMMISSIONS APPLICATION MAIL OR DELIVER TO: 1. Name:_______________________________________________________________________ (Last Name) (First Name) (Middle Name) 2. Address: ____________________________________________________________________ (No.) (Street) (Apt.) (City) (State) (Zip Code) 3. Phones: ____________________________________________________________________ (Home No.) (Work No.) (Cell No.) 4. Email Address: ________________________________________________ For Office Use Only Date Received: For Reviewers Use Only: Reason: Education Experience Incomplete Other Print Form Econmic Oppurtunity Council Low income / non profit Houston Samuel 1890 Robin Ln #103 925577-8493 Vista community college Business 2 THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT 6. PLEASE FILL OUT THE FOLLOWING SECTION COMPLETELY. List experience that relates to the qualifications needed to serve on the local appointive body. Begin with your most recent experience. A resume or other supporting documentation may be attached but it may not be used as a substitute for completing this section. A) Dates (Month, Day, Year) From To Total: Yrs. Mos. Hrs. per week_____ . Volunteer Title Duties Performed Employer’s Name and Address B) Dates (Month, Day, Year) From To Total: Yrs. Mos. Hrs. per week_____ . Volunteer Title Duties Performed Employer’s Name and Address C) Dates (Month, Day, Year) From To Total: Yrs. Mos. Hrs. per week_____ . Volunteer Title Duties Performed Employer’s Name and Address D) Dates (Month, Day, Year) From To Total: Yrs. Mos. Hrs. per week_____ . Volunteer Title Duties Performed Employer’s Name and Address 10/09 present 7/16 present 4 8/2014 9/2018 1 08/2017 03/2019 44 25 owner Houston Insurance agency Changing Lives Community Ministry 3333 Vincent Rd #103 Pleasant Hill Ca Pastor Memory Gardens Cemetery 2011 Arnold Industrial wy Counslor U.s. census Field rep THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT 7. How did you learn about this vacancy? �CCC Homepage Walk-In �Newspaper Advertisement �District Supervisor �Other _________________________ 8. Do you have a Familial or Financial Relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? (Please see Board Resolution no. 2011/55, attached): No ______ Yes______ If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: ______________________________________________ 9. Do you have any financial relationships with the County such as grants, contracts, or other economic relations? No ______ Yes______ If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: ______________________________________________ I CERTIFY that the statements made by me in this application are true, complete, and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are made in good faith. I acknowledge and understand that all information in this application is publically accessible. I understand and agree that misstatements / omissions of material fact may cause forfeiture of my rights to serve on a Board, Committee, or Commission in Contra Costa County. Sign Name: _____________________________________________ Date: __________________________________ Important Information 1. This application is a public document and is subject to the California Public Records Act (CA Gov. Code §6250-6270). 2. Send the completed paper application to the Office of the Clerk of the Board at: 651 Pine Street, Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553. 3. A résumé or other relevant information may be submitted with this application. 4. All members are required to take the following training: 1) The Brown Act, 2) The Better Government Ordinance, and 3) Ethics Training. 5. Members of boards, commissions, and committees may be required to: 1) file a Statement of Economic Interest Form also known as a Form 700, and 2) complete the State Ethics Training Course as required by AB 1234. 6. Advisory body meetings may be held in various locations and some locations may not be accessible by public transportation. 7. Meeting dates and times are subject to change and may occur up to two days per month. 8. Some boards, committees, or commissions may assign members to subcommittees or work groups which may require an additional commitment of time. THIS FORM IS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted Resolution no. 2011/55 on 2/08/2011 as follows: WHEREAS the Board of Supervisors wishes to avoid the reality or appearance of improper influence or favoritism; IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTING A POLICY MAKING FAMILY MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INELIGIBLE FOR APPOINTMENT TO BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS FOR WHICH THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IS THE APPOINTING AUTHORITY NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the following policy is hereby adopted: 1. Mother, father, son, and daughter; 2. Brother, sister, grandmother, grandfather, grandson, and granddaughter; I. SCOPE: This policy applies to appointments to any seats on boards, committees or commissions for which the Contra Costa Co unty Board of Supervisors is the appointing authority. II. POLICY: A person will not be eligible for appointment if he/she is rela ted to a Board of Supervisors’ Member in any of the following relationships: 3. Great-grandfather, great-grandmother, aunt, uncle, nephew, niece, great-grandson, and great-granddaughter; 4. First cousin; 5. Husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, stepson, and stepdaughter; 6. Sister-in-law (brother’s spouse or spouse’s sister), brother-in-law (sister’s spouse or spouse’s brother), spouse’s grandmother, spouse’s grandfather, spouse’s granddaughter, and spouse’s grandson; 7. Registered domestic partner, pursuant to Californi a Family Code section 297. 8. The relatives, as defined in 5 and 6 above, for a registered domestic partner. 9. Any person with whom a Board Member shares a financial interest as defined in the Political Reform Act (Gov’t Code §87103, Financial Interest), such as a business partner or business associate. If "Other" was Selected Give Highest Grade or Educational Level Achieved Name of College Attended Course of Study / Major Units Completed Degree Type Date Degree Awarded Name of College Attended Course of Study / Major Units Completed Select the highest level of education you have received: Other College/ University A Type of Units Completed Semester Degree Awarded? Yes No College/ University B Type of Units Completed None Selected Degree Awarded? Yes No Master's Degree Yale University - School of Management Public and Nonprofit Management 4 MBA - Master of Business Administration 2004 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Electrical Engineering and Political Science 8 Monisha Merchant Page 2 of 5 Degree Type Date Degree Awarded Name of College Attended Course of Study / Major Units Completed Degree Type Date Degree Awarded Course Studied Hours Completed College/ University C Type of Units Completed None Selected Degree Awarded? Yes No Other schools / training completed: Certificate Awarded? Yes No Work History Please provide information on your last three positions, including your current one if you are working. 1st (Most Recent) Bachelor of Science 1999 Monisha Merchant Page 3 of 5 Dates (Month, Day, Year) From - To Hours per Week Worked? Position Title Dates (Month, Day, Year) From - To Hours per Week Worked? Position Title Dates (Month, Day, Year) From - To Hours per Week Worked? Volunteer Work? Yes No Employer's Name and Address Lotus Advisory Ltd. 2072 La Orinda Place Concord, CA 94518 Duties Performed Provide management consulting and government relations services to private, nonprofit, and government clients. 2nd Volunteer Work? Yes No Employer's Name and Address U.S. Senator Michael Bennet Duties Performed 3rd 2015-present 40 Managing Director 2011-2015 40 Senior Advisor 2007-2011 40 Monisha Merchant Page 4 of 5 Position Title Upload a Resume If "Other" was selected please explain Volunteer Work? Yes No Employer's Name and Address Level 3 Communications (now CenturyLink) Duties Performed Final Questions How did you learn about this vacancy? Contra Costa County Homepage . Do you have a Familial or Financial Relationship with a member of the Board of Supervisors? Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Do you have any financial relationships with the County such as grants, contracts, or other economic relations? Yes No If Yes, please identify the nature of the relationship: Please Agree with the Following Statement I understand that this form is a public document and is subject to the California Public Records Act. I Agree Senior Director MonishaMerchant_CCCBoards.pdf Monisha Merchant Page 5 of 5 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT resignation of Rita Xavier and Branin Cook from the Advisory Council on Aging, DECLARE vacancies in the Member-at-Large (MAL) 9 Seat and Local Committee Oakley Seat, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancies as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal lmpact. BACKGROUND: Rita Xavier was appointed to the Advisory Council on Aging MAL 9 seat October 17, 2017. The seat expires September 30, 2020. Branin Cook was appointed to the Local Committee Oakley Seat February 12, 2019. The seat expires September 30, 2019. The Advisory Council on Aging provides a means for countywide planning, cooperation, and coordination for individuals and groups interested in improving and developing services and opportunities for the older residents of the County. The Council provides leadership and advocacy on behalf of older persons as a channel of communication and information on aging. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 27 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Advisory Council on Aging Resignations CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Advisory Council on Aging may not be able to conduct routine business. RECOMMENDATION(S): REAPPOINT the following individual to the District IV seat on the Contra Costa County Merit Board to a term expiring June 30, 2023, as recommended by Supervisor Karen Mitchoff. Eizo Kobayashi Concord, CA 94521 FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa County Merit Board consists of five (5) residents of Contra Costa County who are neither County or District employees nor employees of any organization APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Chow, (925) 521-7100 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 28 To:Board of Supervisors From:Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:REAPPOINT Eizo Kobayashi to the District IV seat of the Contra Costa County Merit Board BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) representing County or District employees. Merit Board members shall be appointed by the Board of Supervisors. They are given the following powers and duties: 1. The merit board shall hear and make final determinations on: appeals fromorders and actions of dismissal, suspension, or reduction in rank or compensation unless alternative jurisdiction is conferred by the Board of Supervisors. When it is given such jurisdiction by the Board of Supervisors, it may decide discrimination complains and other matters. 2. The board shall hear and make recommended determinations on other matters, when it is given jurisdiction of such matters by the Board of Supervisors. 3. The merit board as a whole shall monitor the operation of the county personnel management system including the merit system and report its recommendations from time to time to the Board of Supervisors. Mr. Kobayashi has been an excellent representative on the Merit Board and Supervisor Mitchoff would like to appoint him to an additional term. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Mr. Kobayashi's current term would expire and the District IV seat would become vacant. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the resignation of Miguel Hidalgo-Barnes from the Contra Costa Council on Homelessness, DECLARE vacant the Council on Homelessness Behavioral Health Representative seat and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy as recommended by the Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division Director. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Miguel Hidalgo-Barnes submitted his formal resignation to the Health, Housing and Homeless Services office via email on May 3, 2019. Mr. Hidalgo-Barnes was appointed to the Council on Homelessness Behavioral Health Representative seat on March 13, 2018. The seat appointment will expire December 31, 2020. The Contra Costa Continuum of Care is governed by the Contra Costa Council on Homelessness (hereinafter referred to as the Council). The Council is appointed by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors to assist and provide guidance in the development and implementation of long-range planning APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lavonna Martin, 925-608-6701 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Jaime Jenett C. 29 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Council on Homelessness Resignation BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and policy formulation of homeless issues in Contra Costa County. The Contra Costa Council on Homelessness provides a forum for communication and coordination of the County's Strategic Plan to End Homelessness, educate the community on homeless issues, and advocate on federal, state and local policy issues affecting people who are homeless or at-risk of homelessness. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Council on Homelessness may not be able to meet quorum to vote on items coming before them. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. APPOINT Renee Fernandez-Lipp to the Director 3 seat on the Contra Costa Resource Conservation District Board of Directors to complete the unexpired term ending on November 30, 2020. 2. DECLARE vacant the Director 1 seat held by Thomas Brumleve and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy. FISCAL IMPACT: No County cost. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa Resource Conservation District (RCD) directors are appointed by the County pursuant to a 1998 RCD resolution ordering that all future directors shall be appointed by the County Board of Supervisors in lieu of election (Public Resources Code Section 9314). The mission of the RCD is to carry out natural resources conservation projects through voluntary and cooperative efforts. The RCD is a non-regulatory agency that works with individuals, growers, ranchers, public agencies, non-profit organizations and corporations to accomplish its mission. The USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service provides technical support for the RCD's programs. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea (925) 335-1077 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: CCRCD C. 30 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:RECOMMENDATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE CONTRA COSTA RESOURCE CONSERVATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On May 7, 2018, the Director 3 seat was vacated with the resignation of Bob Case. Today, we are requesting the Board to vacate the Director 1 seat due to the recent resignation of Tom Brumleve. Consequently, the current sitting RCD members are: Igor Skaredoff Bethallyn Black Tom Bloomfield The RCD board recruited for new directors and recommends the appointment of Renee Fernandez-Lipp to the Director 3 seat (see attached RCD Resolution). The RCD is currently recruiting to fill its remaining vacancy, the Director 1 seat. ATTACHMENTS RCD Resolution 2019-03 Candidate Application_Renee Fernandez-Lipp_CCRCD RENEE FERNANDEZ-LIPP 3331 CLAUDIA DRIVE CONCORD 94519 415-542-6090 RENEEFERNANDEZLIPP@GMAIL.COM X GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION X CSU LONG BEACH MECHANICAL ENGINEERING X X 5=+ X X IV I have always had a personal and professional interest in resource conservation and sustainability. As a resident who lives within a block of one of lower Walnut Creek’s natural tributaries, I have a particular interest in the preservation and restoration of Contra Costa’s watersheds. For those living in urban/suburban areas, natural creeks and streams provide an invaluable connection to nature. As a Director on the RCD, I will utilize my extensive professional knowledge and experience in the sustainability field to promote conservation initiatives that benefit Contra Costa’s precious natural resources. The attached resume provides an overview of my over 20 years of professional experience promoting resource conservation projects and programs. In addition to my professional experience, I have been an active volunteer to environmentally focused non-profit organizations. For the past 4 years I served on the Board of Directors of the Global Student Embassy (GSE), a non- profit organization dedicated to promoting sustainable farming practices and environmental conservation in the U.S. and Latin America. Prior to serving on GSE's board I served on the Board of Directors of the Green Science Academy, a non-profit organization that provided environmental and resource conservation education and job training opportunities to under-served communities. UC Davis - Sustainability and the Built Environment (Current Associate Director - 5 mos) Contra Costa Resource Conservation District Director - Board of Directors XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X X Contra Costa Resource Conservation District - Associate Director, current Pittsburg Community Advisory Commission - Commissioner, past Global Student Embassy Board of Directors - Board member, current Green Science Academy Board of Directors - Board member, past 5/7/2019 x RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the resignation of Kelly Stieler, DECLARE vacant the District I Consumer Representative Seat on the Emergency Medical Care Committee, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by the Health Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Received email notification from EMCC District I Consumer Representative Kelly Stieler that she is unable to continue to serve a second term on the Committee. She stated that she also contacted Supervisor Gioia’s office to relay the same information. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to declare this vacancy will delay making a new appointment to the seat. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 925-608-5454 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Rachel Morris, Marcy Wilhelm C. 31 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Declare Emergency Medical Care Committee (EMCC) Vacant Seat (District I) RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the resignation of Aron DeFerrari, DECLARE a vacancy in the Appointee 2 Seat on the Alamo Municipal Advisory Council, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, for a term with an expiration date of December 31, 2020, as recommended by Supervisor Candace Andersen. FISCAL IMPACT: NONE BACKGROUND: The Alamo MAC may advise the Board of Supervisors on services that are or may be provided to the Alamo community by Contra Costa County or other local government agencies. Such services include, but are not limited to, parks and recreation, lighting and landscaping, public health, safety, welfare, public works, code enforcement, land use and planning, transportation and other infrastructure. The Council may also provide input and reports to the District Supervisor, Board of Supervisors, County staff or any County hearing body on issues of concern to the community. The Council may represent the Alamo community before the Board of Supervisors, County Planning Commission and the Zoning Administrator. The Council may APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jill Ray, 925-957-8860 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: District 2 Supervisor, Maddy Book, Alamo MAC, Appointee C. 32 To:Board of Supervisors From:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:RESIGNATION FROM THE ALAMO MUNICIPAL ADVISORY COUNCIL BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) also represent the Alamo community before the Local Agency Formation Commission on proposed boundary changes effecting the community. The Council may advocate on parks and recreation issues to the Town of Danville and the San Ramon Valley Unified School District. Mr. DeFerrari has moved from Alamo and no longer qualifies to serve on the Alamo MAC. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The seat will remain filled. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: NONE RECOMMENDATION(S): DECLARE vacant the Trustee 1 seat on the Byron-Brentwood-Knightsen Union Cemetery District previously held by Sharon Marsh due to death and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Diane Burgis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The District Office was notified May 23, 2019 of the passing of Ms. Sharon Marsh. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lea Castleberry 925-252-4500 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 33 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:VACANCY ON THE BYRON-BRENTWOOD-KNIGHTSEN UNION CEMETERY DISTRICT RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the attached medical staff appointments and reappointments, additional privileges, advancements, and voluntary resignations as recommend by the Medical Staff Executive Committee, at their May 20, 2019 meeting, and by the Health Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has requested that evidence of Board of Supervisors approval for each Medical Staff member will be placed in his or her Credentials File. The attached recommendations for appointment/reappointment were reviewed by the Credentials Committee and approved by the Medical Executive Committee. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Contra Costa Regional Medical and Contra Costa Health Centers' medical staff would not be appropriately credentialed and not be in compliance with The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, James Ham C. 34 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Medical Staff Appointments and Reappointments – May 2019 ATTACHMENTS Attachment MEC Recommendations – May,20 2019 Definitions: A=Active C=Courtesy Aff=Affiliate P/A= Provisional Active P/C= Provisional Courtesy Page 1 A. New Medical Staff Members Bapat, Manasi, MD Internal Medicine -Nephrology Cohen, Nathan, MD Psychiatry/Psychology Keyser, Andrew, MD Emergency Medicine Martinez, Yahaira, DDS Dental Okoye, Uchenna, MD Psychiatry/Psychology Pramanik, Rajiv, MD Emergency Medicine Ruch, Katy, MD Pediatrics B. 1st Year Residents Binstock, Maxwell, MD Boulos, Maryana, MD Castillo, Carla, MD Chang, Jinnie, MD Eshera, Noha, MD Mostow, Jacqueline, MD Pichardo -Gomez, David, MD Priyam, P rachi, MD Richardson, Emma, MD Saho, Fatumata, MD Sanchez, Lilia, MD Wittenburg, Gregory, MD Younge, Marian, MD C. Request for Additional Privileges Applicant Department Requesting Della Selva, Megan, MD Psychiatry/Psychology Psychiatry/Psychology Nanda, Simret, MD Psychiatry/Psychology Psychiatry/Psychology D. Advance to Non-Provisional Chaudhary, Neha, MD Psychiatry/Psychology Eisert, Christian, MD Surgery -ENT Lee, Luke, V., MD Psychiatry/Psychology Leskovar, Tomislav, MD Diagnostic Imaging Menezes, Alicia, MD Surgery -Opthalmology Silver, Deborah, MD Psychiatry/Psychology MEC Recommendations – May,20 2019 Definitions: A=Active C=Courtesy Aff=Affiliate P/A= Provisional Active P/C= Provisional Courtesy Page 2 E. Biennial Reappointments Ahmed, Aneela, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A Baker, Megan, MD Psychiatry/Psychology C Berryman, Elizabeth, MD DFAM A James, Jaison, MD Surgery -Orthopedics A Kinsey, Genevieve, MD Pediatrics C Koliwad, Suneil, MD Internal Medicine C Lee, Rebecca, MD Hospital Medicine A Loda, Kimberly, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A Luburic, Renee, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A Martinez, Daryl, MD Internal Medicine C McCormick, Jane, MD Internal Medicine A McNitt, Louise, MD DFAM A Owens, Nancy, MD Pediatrics A Rogers, Michael, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A Zuniga, Zoraya, MD DFAM A F. Biennial Renew of Privileges Francis, Deidra, NP DFAM AFF Linn, Lizabeth, NP DFAM AFF Madlock, Michele, CNM DFAM AFF G. Voluntary Resignations Chase, Ralph, MD Anesthesia Gomez -Mira, Christina, MD DFAM Scafidi, Jennifer, CNM OB/Gyn Sethi, Saurabh, MD Internal Medicine RECOMMENDATION(S): DECLARE vacant the Appointee 2 seat on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee, previously held by Chris Gallagher due to resignation, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Diane Burgis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Chair of P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee notified the District Office of Mr. Gallagher's resignation effective immediately. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lea Castleberry 925-252-4500 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 35 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:VACANCY ON COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-2A CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION(S): DECLARE vacant the Appointee 7 seat on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee previously held by William Marz due to resignation and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Diane Burgis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Chair of P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee notified the District Office of Mr. Marz resignation effective immediately. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lea Castleberry 925-252-4500 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 36 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:VACANCY ON COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-2A CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION(S): DECLARE vacant the Appointee 6 seat on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee previously held by Ronald Cortez due to resignation, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Diane Burgis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Mr. Cortez notified the District Office on May 30, 2019 of his resignation on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee effective immediately. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lea Castleberry 925-252-4500 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 37 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:VACANCY ON COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-2A CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION(S): DECLARE vacant the Appointee 4 seat on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee previously held by Ron Banducci due to resignation, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Diane Burgis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Mr. Banducci notified the District Office on May 30, 2019 of his resignation on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee effective immediately. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lea Castleberry 925-252-4500 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 38 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:VACANCY ON COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-2A CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION(S): DECLARE vacant the Appointee 3 seat on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee previously held by Henry Schultzel due to resignation and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Diane Burgis. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Mr. Schultzel notified the District Office on May 28, 2019 of his resignation on County Service Area, P-2A Citizen Advisory Committee effective immediately. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lea Castleberry 925-252-4500 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 39 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:VACANCY ON COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-2A CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION(S): Agriculture/Weights and Measures (0335): APPROVE Appropriations and Revenue Adjustment No.005086 to increase revenue in the amount of $850,697 from Unclaimed Gas Tax and contract agreement revenues, and decrease contract agreement revenues in the amount of $70,000 and appropriate $780,697 in expenditures supported by revenue increases. FISCAL IMPACT: This action will adjust revenue allocations from sub-account #9330 in the amount of $850,697 in unclaimed gas taxes and contracts with a decrease of $52,000 in the Exclusion Contract and $18,000 in the Light Brown Apple Moth Contract with an adjusted revenue of $780,697. Expenditures are being adjusted to decrease contracted professional services by $25,000 and increase multiple other expenditure accounts by $805,697, for a total expenditure increase of $780,697. Multiple expenditure accounts are being increased for unexpected moving expenses in 2018, replacement of outdated equipment and software, Weights & Measures upgrades, repairs and replacement of vehicles, and for Temporary Commissioner Salaries. BACKGROUND: Due to increased state pest detection contract funding in fiscal year 2018-19 and 2019-20, the Department APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 608-6600 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 40 To:Board of Supervisors From:Matt Slattengren Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Appropriation Adjustments BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) had increased seasonal Pest Detection personnel time from 0.7 full-time equivalent (FTE) to 0.82 FTE, and added one 0.82 FTE Specialist. This added staff time enables the Department to complete all deliverables of the increased contract. State funding through unrefunded gas tax and the high-risk exclusion contract increased fiscal year 2018-19 and will continue at the new levels in 2019-20. This continued additional revenue has helped cover increased personnel and building costs. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS TC24/27 AP#005086 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Appropriations & Adjustment No. 5086 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT the following advocacy positions on the following bills, as recommended by the Legislation Committee at their May 13, 2019 meeting. Note that two of these bills, AB 215 (Mathis) and AB 1216 (Bauer-Kahan) were held in Appropriations and will not advance this year; advocacy letters will thus not be sent for them. Number Author Title Position Recommendation Status ACA 1 Aguiar-Curry Local Government Financing: Affordable Housing SUPPORT to Third reading in Assembly AB 388 Limon Alzheimer's Disease SUPPORT to Third reading in Assembly AB 215 Mathis Dumping SUPPORT held in Appropriations AB 1216 Bauer-Kahan Solid Waste: Illegal Dumping SUPPORT held in Appropriations SB 409 Wilk Illegal Dumping SUPPORT to Assembly Public Safety SB 276 Pan Immunizations: Medical Exemptions SUPPORT to Assembly AB 723 Wicks, Bonta Low-Income Housing Incentives: Leased Rental Housing OPPOSE to Senate Committee on Governance and Finance AB 1544 Gipson Community Paramedicine Oppose Unless Amended to Senate AB 1487 Chiu San Francisco Bay Area: Housing Development: Financing OPPOSE to Senate APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 41 To:Board of Supervisors From:LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Advocacy Positions on State Legislation of Interest RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) SB 438 Hertzberg Emergency Medical Services: Dispatch OPPOSE to Assembly FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact from the adoption of advocacy positions. The fiscal impact of each bill, if known, is included in the background information for the bill. BACKGROUND: At its May 13, 2019 meeting, the Legislation Committee (Chair Burgis, Vice Chair Mitchoff) considered the following bills and directed staff, by unanimous vote, to send them to the Board of Supervisors for adoption of an advocacy position. Note that two of the bills, AB 215 (Mathis) and AB 1216 (Bauer-Kahan) were held in Appropriations committee, so these bills will not advance this year and no advocacy position is required at this time. Number Author Title Recommendation Status Bill Text 1 ACA 1 Aguiar-Curry Local Government Financing: Affordable Housing SUPPORT to Third reading in Assembly http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200ACA1 2 AB 388 Limon Alzheimer's Disease SUPPORT Pending in Senate http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB388 3 AB 215 Mathis Dumping SUPPORT held in Appropriations 4 AB 1216 Bauer-Kahan Solid Waste: Illegal Dumping SUPPORT held in Appropriations 5 SB 409 Wilk Illegal Dumping SUPPORT Assembly Public Safety http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB409 6 SB 276 Pan Immunizations: Medical Exemptions SUPPORT Assembly http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB276 7 AB 723 Wicks, Bonta Low-Income Housing Incentives: Leased Rental Housing Oppose Unless Amended Senate Governance and Finance http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB723 8 AB 1544 Gipson and Gloria Community Paramedicine Oppose Unless Amended Senate http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB1544 9 AB 1487 Chiu San Francisco Bay Area: Housing Development: Financing OPPOSE Senate http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB1487 10 SB 438 Hertzberg Emergency Medical Services: Dispatch OPPOSE Assembly http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200SB438 CLERK'S ADDENDUM Public comment: Chris Farnitano, MD Adopted as presented. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22099 to establish the classification of Library Services Manager (3KGA) (unrepresented) at salary plan and grade B85 1007 ($8,335 - $10,131) and add one (1) Library Services Manager position. Abolish the classification of Virtual Library Manager (3KHB) (represented), and cancel one (1) vacant position no. 16532 in the Library Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will result in an annual cost increase of approximately $22,114. No fiscal impact to the County General Fund. This position is funded in the Library Fund. BACKGROUND: A careful internal analysis of Library management positions and the need for senior management support was conducted, as well as an external analysis that compared Contra Costa County Library with neighboring library systems. The Library determined it would achieve greater efficiencies by adding a Library Services Manager position to assist the County Librarian and the Deputy County Librarian in the day to day administration, supervision and evaluation of major system-wide County Library programs and services and to serve as a member of the Library management team for planning, budgeting, personnel and other administrative activities including the direct supervision of a number of community library managers. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Beth Kilian, (925) 608-7702 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier , Deputy cc: Michelle McCauley C. 42 To:Board of Supervisors From:Melinda Cervantes, County Librarian Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Establish and Add One Library Services Manager Position; Abolish and Cancel One Position in the Library Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The addition of a Library Services Manager position provides a promotional opportunity for existing professional level library staff. The person hired into the Library Services Manager position will report to either the County Librarian or the appropriate Deputy County Librarian, depending on assignment. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this position is not approved, the Library will have insufficient support to most effectively conduct the daily administration of its 26 libraries. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 22099_Library Services Mgr MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed P300 22099 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 22099 DATE 5/10/2017 Department No./ Department County Library Budget Unit No. 0620 Org No. 3702 Agency No. 85 Action Requested: Abolish and Cancel Position Number 16532, 40/40 Virtual Library Manager (3KHB) Establish and A dd One Library Services Manager, 40/40 Position in the Library Department Proposed Effective Date: 7/1/2019 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $22,114.00 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $0.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Library Fund Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Melinda S. Cervantes ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT BR for JE 6/8/2017 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDA TIONS DATE 5/1/2019 Establish the Library Services Manager (3KGA) (unrepresented) classification and add one (1) Library Services Manager (3KGA) position and abolish the Virtual Library Manager (3KHB) (represented) classifi cation and c ancel position number 16532 Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Gladys Scott Reid 5/1/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 5/2/2019 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources /s/ Julie DiMaggio Enea Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 6/4/2019 No. xxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to del ivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22444 to reassign one (1) Secretary-Journey Level (J3TF) (represented) position (#4439) at Salary Plan and Grade 3R2 1018 ($3,605 - $4,181) from Department 0504 (Workforce Services Bureau) to Department 0501 (Administrative Support Services Bureau), in the Employment and Human Services Department effective July 1, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will have a salary and benefit cost shift from the Workforce Services Bureau (0504) to the Administrative Support Services Bureau (0501). The position will be funded with 42% Federal, 53% State and 5% County funds. Pension costs are projected to increase by $3,218. BACKGROUND: The Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) is requesting to move the vacant Secretary-Journey Level (represented) position number 4439, from the Workforce Services Bureau to the Administrative Support Services Bureau. The EHSD Chief Financial Officer requires the APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Reni Radeva (925) 608-5036 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: Reni Radeva C. 43 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Reassign a Vacant Secretary-Journey Level Position from Department 0504 to Department 0501 in EHSD BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) administrative support of an experienced permanent secretary. The position will be responsible for performing varied and complex secretarial functions. Currently, the Chief Financial Officer is not supported by a secretary. Creating the appropriate staffing level to support the Chief Financial Officer is crucial for the operational needs of the EHSD's Fiscal Unit. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, EHSD will not be able to maximize efficiency in administering its financial services. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 22444 BOS 6.11.19 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed P300 22444 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 22444 DATE 4/1/2019 Department No./ Department Employment and Human Services/Admin Budget Unit No. 501 Org No. 5101 Agency No. 019 Action Requested: Reassign one (1) Secretary -Journey Level (J3TF) vacant (represented) position (#4439) from Department 0504 to Department 0501 and flex -up the position to Secretary -Advanced Level (J3TG ) in the Employment and Human Services Department . Proposed Effective Date: 7/1/2019 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $89,194.00 Net County Cost $4,460.00 Total this FY $89,194.00 N.C.C. this FY $4,460.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT N/A Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Kathy Gallagher/Director ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Julia Taylor 4/17/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 5/8/2019 Reassign one (1) Secretary -Journey Level (J3TF) vacant (represented) position (#4439) from Department 0504 to Department 0501, in the Employment and Human Services Department. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Act ion. 7/1/2019(Date) Amanda Monson 5/8/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 6/4/2019 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 6/4/2019 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms o f: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have consid ered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ACKNOWLEDGE the Human Resources Director has authorized suspension of competition for the classifications of Mental Health Community Support Worker I and Mental Health Community Support Worker II in the Health Services Department, as provided for in the County's Personnel Management Regulations, Section 502 - Suspension of Competition. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no additional cost associated with direct appointments as the cost is already included in the Department's budget. BACKGROUND: Personnel Management Regulations Section 502, Suspension of Competition, authorizes the Director of Human Resources to suspend competition and approve direct appointment to merit system positions where use of competitive examination procedures are impractical. It also requires that a report of the suspension be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The Health Services Department is requesting direct appointment for the classifications of Mental Health Community Support Worker I and Mental Health Community Support Worker II. Positions are allocated to Behavioral Health, Public Health and the George Miller Wellness Center within Contra Costa Regional Medical Center APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jo-Anne Linares, (925) 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: C. 44 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Direct Appointment for the Classifications of Mental Health Support Worker I & II in the Health Services Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and Health Centers. The Mental Health Community Support Worker-Project classification was established in 1994 with the intent to allow mental health consumers the opportunity to work in the mental health system by providing peer support to individuals currently receiving treatment. In April of 2000, the project classification was transitioned into the merit system classification of Mental Health Community Support Worker I and a second level classification of Mental Health Community Support Worker II was established to provide a career ladder and upward mobility for incumbents. Over the years, the role has expanded to include peer support to parents and family members of seriously emotionally disturbed children and adolescents as well as families of mentally ill adults. Additionally, the Office for Consumer Empowerment was formed, where Mental Health Community Support Workers work as advocates representing the mental health consumer perspective in the development and implementation of mental health programs, and work to decrease stigma and discrimination, and increase consumer involvement in quality improvement and system change activities. To qualify for the positions, individuals must successfully complete a training program approved by the Behavioral Health Division. Per the job specifications, approved training includes the (1) Service Provider Individualized Recovery Intensive Training (SPIRIT) which involves 9-college units in two semesters of educational classroom training with a work-study/summer internship program; (2) National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI) Family-to-Family Training which involves a 12-session education program for families, significant others and friends of people living with mental illness; and (3) Family Partnership Training which also includes a 12-week educational course to parents and caregivers of children with mental illness. Health Services has requested the direct appointment process for all current and future vacancies for Mental Health Community Support Worker I and II positions pursuant to Section 502. The Department's recruitment of qualified individuals shall be as follows: The Office for Consumer Empowerment will maintain a list of all graduates from the training programs. Depending on areas of interest in employment, candidates are matched and referred to hiring managers as vacancies occur. Candidates are invited to a hiring interview. If selected, the pre-employment screening process is completed before a final offer of employment is made. Permanent appointment of incumbents to these classifications also requires successful completion of a 9-month probationary period. This action informs the Board of Supervisors that the Human Resources Director has determined that, based on the unique requirements associated with these classifications, a traditional competitive examination process would not be effective and Suspension of Competition is authorized pursuant to Section 502 for the Mental Health Community Support Worker I and II positions. This authorization may be revoked at any time should the Director of Human Resources determine that direct appointment is no longer appropriate. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the opportunity of mental health community peer and support workers to obtain gainful employment with Contra Costa County may be adversely impacted. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: N/A ATTACHMENTS Job Spec Revision for MHCSW I Job Spec Revision for MHCSW II SPIRIT Program App Background Info 2007 Contra Costa County Class Code: VQWE MENTAL HEALTH COMMUNITY SUPPORT WORKER I Class specifications are intended to present a descriptive list of the range of duties performed by employees in the class. Class specifications are not intended to refl ect all duties performed within the job. DEFINITION : Under general supervision, provides peer support to mental health clients, parents, children, and families individually, in groups and in crisis situations; and performs related work as required. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS: Positions in this class are assigned to any of the Behavioral Health Division’s programs/sites, and function as members of a team providing services to families of seriously emotionally disturbed children and adolescents, seriously mentally ill young adults, adults and older adults and/or their families. This class is distinguished from Mental Health Community Support Worker II in that incumbents in the latter class perform more complex duties and work more independently. Depending on the assignment, supervision may be received from a Mental Health Family Services Coordinator, Mental Health Consumer Empowerment Coordinator, a Mental Health Program Manager, or Mental Health Program Supervisor. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education: Current enrollment in or successful completion of a training program approved by the County Costa County Mental Behavioral Health Division. Positions assigned to Adult Services and the Office for Consumer Empowerment must currently be enrolled in or have successfully completed a training program approved by the Mental Health Division Director. Examples of approved training programs include: 1) Service Provider Individualized Recovery Intensive Training (SPIRIT); and 2) National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI) Family-to-Family training; and Family Partnership Training. Other qualifying combinations of formal or informal training and/or work and life experiences will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the Mental Health Division Director. Positions assigned to a Child/Adolescent Services Program must currently be enrolled in or have successfully completed the Child and Family Team Facilitator Training or other equivalent training program approved by the Mental Health Division Director. Other qualifying combinations of formal or informal training and/or work and life experiences will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the Mental Health Division Director. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES : Ability to:  Follow oral and written instructions;  Work harmoniously with clients and co -workers;  Work under supervision;  Write simple reports and maintain records;  Represent the mental health consumer/family/caregiver perspective. TYPICAL TASKS: Positions assigned to a Child/Adolescent Services Program:  Attends and participates in Wraparound meetings as a team member;  Attends and participates in interagency meetings;  Assists in reviewing clients’ functional assessment and determines clients’ needs in partnership with parent(s) and clinical staff;  Teaches daily living activities including budgeting, cooking, shopping, crisis support, wraparound team participation, and self-advocacy;  Acts as a parental resource and provides consultation to clinical staff;  Transports, accompanies, attends and advocates with clie nt at appointments and interagency meetings;  Links clients with resources in the community and assists in identifying additional resources;  Provides housing counseling and assistance;  Provides support to residentially placed youngsters and their families;  Assists clients in acquiring and maintaining public benefits such as Medi-Cal and Healthy Families;  Leads group outings and co-leads groups and parent trainings;  Completes necessary paperwork in a timely manner. Positions Assigned to Adult Services as Consumer Providers :  Assists in reviewing clients’ functional assessment and determines clients’ needs in partnership with clinical staff;  Teaches daily living activities including budgeting, cooking, shopping, crisis support, wraparound team participation, and self-advocacy;  Transports and accompanies clients to appointments;  Provides housing counseling and assistance;  Provides support to residents of board and care homes;  Assists clients in acquiring and maintaining public benefits such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Aide Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), and General Assistance (GA).  Leads or co-leads group outings;  Links clients with resources in the community and assists in identifying additional resources;  Completes necessary paperwork in a timely manner. Positions Assigned to Adult Services as Family Providers:  Welcomes families of consumers into the system;  Acts as the family voice and provides consultation and assistance to staff;  Addresses concerns and answers questions that family members need resolved;  Leads or co-leads multi-family groups  Helps families to maintain the consumers living in their homes;  Transports and accompanies families and consumers to appointments and meetings;  Acts as a guide for housing and community resources ;  Assists family members acting on behalf of a relative to acquire and maintain public benefits such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Aide Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), and General Assistance (GA); Attends trainings as required;  Attends and participates in staff meetings as a team member;  Attends and participates in interagency meetings;  Completes necessary paperwork in a timely manner. Positions Assigned to the Office for Consumer Empowerment:  Participates in projects of the Office for Consumer Empowerment related to areas of expertise (Recovery Training and Education, Employing Consumers as Providers of Mental Health Services, Systems Change, Building Consumer -Operated Programs, etc.);  Increases consumer involvement in quality imp rovement and system change activities;  Disseminates information to consumers and members of the mental health community;  Makes presentations on recovery and the consumer/survivor/ex-patient movement;  Conducts outreach and engagement to increase diversity o f consumer involvement;  Organizes client meetings and educational events;  Represents the mental health consumer perspective in the development and implementation of mental health programs;  Provides written and/or verbal reports as required. Established: November 2000 Revised: September 2006 Revised: July 2009 – OP Revised: January 2019 Contra Costa County Class Code: VQVB MENTAL HEALTH COMMUNITY SUPPORT WORKER I I Class specifications are intended to present a descriptive list of the range of duties performed by employees in the class. Class specifications are not intended to refl ect all duties performed within the job. DEFINITION : Under general supervision, provides peer support to mental health clients, parents, children, and families individually, in groups and in crisis situations; and performs related work as required. DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS: Positions in this class are assigned to any of the Behavioral Health Division’s programs/sites, and function as members of a team providing services to families of seriously emotionally disturbed children and adolescents, seriously mentally ill young adults, adults and older adults and/or their families. This class is distinguished from Mental Health Community Support Worker II in that incumbents in the latter class perform more complex duties and work more independently. Depending on the assignment, supervision may be received from a Mental Health Family Services Coordinator, Mental Health Consumer Empowerment Coordinator, a Mental Health Program Manager, or Mental Health Program Supervisor. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS: Education: Successful completion of a training program approved by the County Costa County Mental Behavioral Health Division. Positions assigned to Adult Services and the Office for Consumer Empowerment must currently be enrolled in or have successfully completed a training program approved by the Mental Health Division Director. Examples of approved training programs include: 1) Service Provider Individualized Recovery Intensive Training (SPIRIT); and 2) National Alliance for the Mentally Ill (NAMI) Family-to-Fami ly training; and Family Partnership Training. Other qualifying combinations of formal or informal training and/or work and life experiences will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the Mental Health Division Director. Positions assigned to a Child/Adolescent Services Program must currently be enrolled in or have successfully completed the Child and Family Team Facilitator Training or other equivalent training program approved by the Mental Health Division Director. Other qualifying combinations of formal or informal training and/or work and life experiences will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the Mental Health Division Director. KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ABILITIES : Ability to:  Follow oral and written instructions;  Work harmoniously with clients and co-workers;  Work under supervision;  Write simple reports and maintain records;  Represent the mental health consumer/family/caregiver perspective. TYPICAL TASKS: Positions assigned to a Child/Adolescent Services Program:  Attends and participates in Wraparound meetings as a team member;  Attends and participates in interagency meetings;  Assists in reviewing clients’ functional assessment and determines clients’ needs in partnership with parent(s) and clinical staff;  Teaches daily living activities including budgeting, cooking, shopping, crisis support, wraparound team participation, and self-advocacy;  Acts as a parental resource and provides consultation to clinical staff;  Transports, accompanies, attends and advocates with client at appointments and interagency meetings;  Links clients with resources in the community and assists in identifying additional resources;  Provides housing counseling and assistance;  Provides support to residentially placed youngsters and their families;  Assists clients in acquiring and maintaining public benefits such as Medi-Cal and Healthy Families;  Leads group outings and co-leads groups and parent trainings;  Completes necessary paperwork in a timely manner. Positions Assigned to Adult Services as Consumer Providers :  Assists in reviewing clients’ functional assessment and determines clients’ needs in partnership with clinical staff;  Teaches daily living activities including budgeting, cooking, shopping, crisis support, wraparound team participation, and self-advocacy;  Transports and accompanies clients to appointments;  Provides housing counseling and assistance;  Provides support to residents of board and care homes;  Assists clients in acquiring and maintaining public benefits such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Aide Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), and General Assistance (GA).  Leads or co-leads group outings;  Links clients with resources in the community and assists in identifying additional resources;  Completes necessary paperwork in a timely manner. Positions Assigned to Adult Services as Family Providers:  Welcomes families of consumers into the system;  Acts as the family voice and provides consultation and assistance to staff;  Addresses concerns and answers questions that family members need resolved;  Le ads or co-leads multi-family groups  Helps families to maintain the consumers living in their homes;  Transports and accompanies families and consumers to appointments and meetings;  Acts as a guide for housing and community resources;  Assists family members acting on behalf of a relative to acquire and maintain public benefits such as Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Temporary Aide Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), and General Assistance (GA); Attends trainings as required;  Attends and participates in staff meetings as a team member;  Attends and participates in interagency meetings;  Completes necessary paperwork in a timely manner. Positions Assigned to the Office for Consumer Empowerment:  Participates in projects of the Office for Consumer Empowerment related to areas of expertise (Recovery Training and Education, Employing Consumers as Providers of Mental Health Services, Systems Change, Building Consumer -Operated Programs, etc.);  Increases consumer involvement in quality improvement and system change activities;  Disseminates information to consumers and members of the mental health community;  Makes presentations on recovery and the consumer/survivor/ex-patient movement;  Conducts outreach and engagement to increase diversity of consumer involvement;  O rganizes client meetings and educational events;  Represents the mental health consumer perspective in the development and implementation of mental health programs;  Provides written and/or verbal reports as required. Team Leaders When designated as a team leader, may perform any of the tasks above. In addition:  May arrange day-to-day staff work schedules for the unit, including relief coverage;  Trains new Mental Health Community Support Worker I staff;  May attend meetings with clinical staff and consumers to provide support and advocacy;  May attend policy and/or decision-making meetings to represent the consumer or family perspective. Established: November 2000 Revised: September 2006 Revised: July 2009 – OP Revised: January 2019 SPIRIT Application 2019 1 Behavioral Health Service Provider Individualized Recovery Intensive Training The SPIRIT class will begin in January 2019 at Contra Costa Community College, San Pablo, CA SPIRIT is a 9 unit college accredited course taught in collaboration with Contra Costa College. The course teaches students how to develop core skills to empower one’s self by attaining and maintaining recovery and resiliency through self-awareness and peer/family support, while learning to assist others in doing the same. The completion of this class leads to a Certificate of Accomplishment in Peer Support. This program is intended for individuals who fit at least one of the following criteria: ____ A person who has self-identified as having lived experience of recovery from mental illness, substance use disorder, or both. ____ A transition-age youth or young adult 18 - 26 who has self-identified as having lived experience of recovery from mental illness, substance use disorder, or both. ____ A person with lived experience as a self-identified family member of an adult experiencing mental illness, substance use disorder, or both. ____ A person who is parenting or has parented a child or adult experiencing mental illness, substance use disorder, or both. This person may be a birth parent, adoptive parent, or family member standing in for an absent parent. Goals 1. To become more empowered, explore potential and help others learn resiliency and empowerment skills. 2. To gain an understanding of the importance of peer and family support as an integral part of the recovery and resiliency journey, as well as to the overall behavioral health system of care. 3. To gain a working understanding of Contra Costa Behavioral Health’s system of care which includes, Mental Health Services, Housing and Homeless Services, Alcohol and Other Drug Services, and Health Services broadly, and recovery/resiliency oriented techniques and principles. 4. To identify, develop and sustain your personal support system, develop and use a personal Wellness Recovery Action Plan and to help others to incorporate these skills into their personal wellness process. 5. To become more aware of community resources which aid peers and their families, including young adults and children in living successfully within the larger community. 6. To explore career options that will help you develop the skills enabling you to find meaningful activity and to learn skills and participate in internship training in the behavioral health field. SPIRIT Application 2019 2 The Behavioral Health Service Provider Individualized Recovery Intensive Training (SPIRIT) includes two components; the comprehensive classroom training and support program, followed by the individualized Work-Study placement. This program is a collaboration between Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services (CCBHS), Office for Consumer Empowerment (OCE), and Contra Costa College (CCC). Application Deadline and Mailing Information Application Process: This APPLICATION is due by October 12, 2018 Please submit your completed application to: Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services Office for Consumer Empowerment 1340 Arnold Drive, Suite 200 Martinez, CA 94553 Fax (925) 957-5156 For further information about the SPIRIT Training or application, please contact: Quincy Slatten @ Quincy.Slatten@hsd.cccounty.us (925) 957-5113 or Michael Petersen @ Michael.Petersen@hsd.cccounty.us (925) 957-5143 Training Components I. Intensive Classroom Training (SPIRIT I and II): The classroom training takes place during the Spring 2019 college semester (starting in January 2019) at Contra Costa College in San Pablo. It consists of two three unit college classes (six units total), SPIRIT I and SPIRIT II. Students take SPIRIT I for the first half of the semester, and then SPIRIT II during the second half of the semester. Students may not participate in SPIRIT II without successful completion of SPIRIT I. II. Work-Study/Summer Internship (SPIRIT III): The work study portion of SPIRIT takes place during the summer 2019 college semester and includes a six week internship (for ten to fifteen hours per week) at a human service agency and once a week classroom instruction. Students must successfully complete both SPIRIT I and II to participate in SPIRIT III. Students receive three units of college credits for successfully completing SPIRIT III. III. Allowance: A limited number of students may be eligible for an allowance to assist with transportation and other expenses needed to complete the training. Allowance selection is based on where behavioral health services are received, application content, and an in-person interview. SPIRIT Application 2019 3 Anna M. Roth, RN, MS, MHP Contra Costa Behavioral Health Health Services Director Administrative Offices Matthew P. White, MD 1340 Arnold Dr. Ste. 200 Acting Behavioral Health Services Director Martinez CA. 94553 Ph (925) 957-5150 Fax (925) 957-5156 Dear SPIRIT Applicant, SPIRIT is a behavioral health peer and family driven and focused college accredited class. SPIRIT is facilitated by peers and family members for peers and family members. Because SPIRIT is a collaboration with Contra Costa College, some of your personal and identifying information may be shared and exchanged with the college. Additionally, the College may require some administrative information, such as attendance, grades, conduct, or other college related activities. Being an applicant or participant in SPIRIT may identify you as a peer of behavioral health services or a family member of a person receiveing services. SPIRIT Application Please print or type legibly. DO NOT USE CURSIVE HANDWRITING  Please answer each question carefully. Be as direct and specific as possible.  Use extra paper if necessary. Number answers on extra paper. If you have questions about the application, please Contact: Quincy Slatten @ Quincy.Slatten@hsd.cccounty.us (925) 957-5113 or Michael Petersen @ Michael.Petersen@hsd.cccounty.us (925) 957-5143 I have read and understand the above statement. This acknowledgement is advisory only, and is not consent to release information. ______________________________________ ___________________ Signature Date ______________________________________ Print Name SPIRIT Application 2019 4 Behavioral Health Service Provider Individualized Recovery Intensive Training This program is intended for individuals who fit at least one of the following criteria: Please check mark the box below that you identify with. ____ A person who has self-identified as having lived experience of recovery from mental illness, substance use disorder, or both. ____ A transition-age youth or young adults 18 - 26 who has self-identified as having lived experience of recovery from mental illness, substance use disorder, or both. ____ A person with lived experience as a self-identified family member of an adult experiencing mental illness, substance use disorder, or both. ____ A person who is parenting or has parented a child or adult experiencing mental illness, substance use disorder, or both. This person may be a birth parent, adoptive parent, or family member standing in for an absent parent. 1. Name/Personal Information: Last: _____________________________________________________ First: ______________________________________________________ Address:_____________________________________________________________________ City: ________________________________ State: ____ Zip : ______________ Home Phone: (______) __________________ Cell Phone: (______) __________________ E-Mail Address: _____________________________________________________ 2. Please list two references: a. Name: _________________________________________________ Phone: __________________________________________________ Agency: _________________________________________________ b. Name: __________________________________________________ Phone: __________________________________________________ Agency: _________________________________________________ SPIRIT Application 2019 5 3. Do you identify as a behavioral health peer (a person with a mental health condition or substance use disorder, or both) or family member (parent, caregiver or family member of someone who receives behavioral health services)? If so, are you willing to share this with others in your work as a Peer/Family Provider? ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ 4. We value personal or lived experience in the behavioral health system. This may include personal experience that gives insight into behavioral health, dual diagnosis, self-help, recovery/resiliency- based services, or experiences you’ve had helping peers and/or family members. Please describe what involvement or knowledge you have that will help you or add to your skills as a peer provider or family member in behavioral health. ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ SPIRIT Application 2019 6 5. In order to do well in this training, people who have had problems with drug and/or alcohol abuse need to be in recovery (abstaining from use of alcohol and other substances, especially within a professional/academic setting). If this applies to you, how long have you been active in the recovery process? ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ 6. Why is it important to learn about and practice methods of wellness, recovery, and resiliency in mental health and/or substance use? _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ SPIRIT Application 2019 7 7. Based on your experiences in behavioral health or navigating services for a family member, are there particular types of positions that interest you the most? Please List here: ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ 8. Why do you want to participate in the SPIRIT Behavioral Health Service Provider Training? ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ SPIRIT Application 2019 8 9. Please specify the highest level of education completed. There is no specific level of education required to apply for the training, however certain job classifications do require a minimum level of education, usually a HS diploma or GED. ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ 10. Do you have experience with peer or family support as a peer, family, or parent provider? (working, living, assisting peers or family members or being assisted by people with behavioral health issues) If so, please describe your experience. ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ SPIRIT Application 2019 9 11. Please describe an experience you have had working or interacting with someone or a group of people different from yourself. (Different from you in terms of language, social status, culture, race, religion, sexual orientation, behavioral health diagnosis, ethnic background, or any combination of these). Please include: a) How they were different from you b) Describe the experience c) What did you learn from the experience? A. _________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ B. _________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ C. _________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ SPIRIT Application 2019 10 12. Behavioral health providers must deal with potential conflict amongst co-workers and/or the peers or family members they serve. Please describe: (provide an answer for each question) a) A situation in your personal or professional life where you’ve experienced conflict. b) What steps did you take to resolve the situation? c) What would you do differently were a similar situation to occur again? d) What did you learn from this experience? A. _________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ B. _________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ C. _________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ D. _________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ SPIRIT Application 2019 11 13. Computer Proficiency; Do you know how to do the following tasks on a computer? (circle yes or no for each) a. Send and receive email: yes no b. Write and print documents: yes no c. Use the internet to do research and register for classes: yes no 14. If you speak or read and write in another language in addition to English, please specify the language and circle your level of ability with reading/writing and or speaking. a. ________________________________ fair good fluent fair good fluent Language Speaking Reading/ Writing b. ________________________________ fair good fluent fair good fluent Language Speaking Reading/ Writing 15. Please list the most recent volunteer work you have done: (Begin with the most recent. Please use extra paper if needed). a. ______________________ ______________________ _____________________ Type of Work Location/Agency Dates Worked b. ______________________ ______________________ _____________________ Type of Work Location/Agency Dates Worked c. ______________________ ______________________ _____________________ Type of Work Location/Agency Dates Worked SPIRIT Application 2019 12 16. Please list any paid employment experience that you have: (Begin with the most recent. Please use extra paper if needed). a. ______________________ ______________________ ____________________ Type of Work Location/Agency Dates Worked b. ______________________ ______________________ _____________________ Type of Work Location/Agency Dates Worked c. ______________________ ______________________ _____________________ Type of Work Location/Agency Dates Worked 17. Is there anything else you would like to add? _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ Please submit your completed application to: Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services Office for Consumer Empowerment 1340 Arnold Drive, Suite 200 Martinez, CA 94553 Fax (925) 957-5156 WILLIAM B. WALKER, M.D. Health Services Director DONNA M. WIGAND, L.C.S.W. Mental Health Director CONTRA COSTA MENTAL HEALTH ADULT/OLDER ADULT PROGRAM VICTOR MONTOYA , PROGRAM CHIEF 1340 Arnold Drive, Suite 200 Martinez, CA 94553 -4639 Ph 925/957 -5117 Fax 925/957 -5156 vmontoya@hsd.co.contra- costa.ca.us Contra Costa Substance Abuse Services  Contra Costa Emergency Medical Services  Contra Costa Environmental Health  Contra Costa Health Plan Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs  Contra Costa Mental Health  Contra Costa Public Health  Contra Costa Regional Medical Center  Contra Costa Health Centers TO: Shelley Pighin, Health Services Personnel Officer Jamie Holgerson, Personnel Services Assistant III FROM: Stacey L. Tupper, Administrative Services Assistant III DATE: January 17, 2007 SUBJECT: Justification for Direct Appointment - Mental Health Community Support Worker Classification ______________________________________________________________________________ In September 2000, a request and justification for direct appointments to the classification of Mental Health Community Support Worker was submitted to the Human Resources Department and subsequently granted. It is my understanding that Human Resources has requested a new justification, as we are requesting direct appointments for individuals who are not in project positions, as was the case when the original request was made. Please note that all appointments to this classification subsequent to 2000 have been made by direct appointment. When the classification of Mental Health Community Support Worker was originally established, the intent of the positions was to allow former mental health consumers the opportunity to work in the mental health system, providing peer support to individuals currently receiving treatment. As mental health systems around the nation moved away from the medical model of treatment toward the rehabilitation model, these systems began including consumers in program planning, development and service delivery. Because these individuals have experienced the system firsthand, their contributions have been invaluable in providing more effective services to our clients. Mental Health Community Support Workers were originally only assigned to provide peer support to consumers of the Adult Mental Health System. However, several years ago, the practice of hiring peers to provide services to our clients expanded to the Children’s System of Care, and we began hiring individuals on a contract basis who were referred to as “parent partners.” Parent partners provide peer support to parents and families of seriously emotionally disturbed children and adolescents who receive services from our system. Parent partners all have seriously emotionally disturbed children in the mental health system and assist other parents in navigating that system. They have been part of the Children’s System of Care for years, working under individual contracts, rather than as permanent merit system employees. Parent partners all complete comprehensive Child and Family Team Facilitator Training. Also several years ago, the Mental Health Division began employing staff under contract to work as consumer advocates for Mental Health Administration’s Office for Consumer Empowerment. These staff are consumer providers who represent the mental health consumer perspective in the development and implementation of mental health programs and work to increase consumer involvement in quality improvement and system change activities. These staff all complete the training provided by Mental Health Administration’s Office In late 2006, we received direction from the County Administrator’s Office that we were to no longer hire “contract employees” and were to either appoint those individuals under contract with the Division to positions in appropriate existing merit system positions or create new classifications for those individuals. Rather than create new classifications for the parent partners and consumer advocates, we modified the job specifications of Mental Health Community Support Worker I and II to include the duties performed by those staff, who also provide peer support within other parts of the mental health system. Based on the special requirements associated with this classification, it would not be viable to fill vacancies through the traditional competitive examination process administered by the Human Resources Department. We are therefore requesting vacancies in this classification be filled through the direct appointment process. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22466 to add one (1) Account Clerk-Experienced Level (JDVC) (represented) position at salary plan and grade 3RH 0755 ($3,387 - $4,199) and cancel one (1) Office Manager (JJHC) (represented) position #1795 at salary plan and grade ZAX 1369 ($4,751 - $6,067) in the Public Works Department. FISCAL IMPACT: This action would result in an estimated annual cost savings of $55,000. BACKGROUND: Prior to November 1, 2014, position #1795 was classified as Account Clerk-Advanced Level before it was reclassified to Office Manager. On March 28, 2019, the Office Manager in the Print & Mail Division of the Public Works Department retired from County service. After a re-evaluation of the desk duties, it was determined the primary job responsibilities are to manage purchase orders; process TC52’s and invoices for payment by the Auditor's Office; charge account receivables for work orders; prepare end-of-month APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Adrienne Todd, 925-313-2108 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier , Deputy cc: Adrienne Todd C. 45 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one Account Clerk-Experienced Level position and Cancel one Office Manager position BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) reports for Public Works Finance and monthly reports for County departments; accept payments and write receipts; maintain and reconcile physical inventory of supplies; maintain and check payroll and compute and process bills. These job responsibilities are more in line with the Account Clerk-Experienced Level classification. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Print and Mail Division of the Public Works Department will not have the appropriate level of support to complete the accounting clerical responsibilities required to operate the division. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No Impact AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 #22466 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed P300 22466 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 22466 DATE 5/14/2019 Department No./ Department Public Works Budget Unit No. 0148 Org No. 4210 Agency No. 65 Action Requested: ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22466 to add one (1) Account Clerk -Experienced Level (JDVC) (represented) position at salary plan and grade 3RH 0755 ($3,387 - $4,199) and cancel one (1) Office Manager (JJHC) (represented) position #1795 at salary plan and grade ZAX 1369 ($4,751 - $6,067) in the Public Works Department. Proposed Effective Date: 4/1/2019 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget : Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost ($55,000) Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY ($55,000) N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT N/A - Cost savings Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Brian M. Balbas ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT L.Strobel 5/14/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 5/24/2019 Add one (1) Account Clerk -Experienced Level (JDVC) (represented) position and cancel one (1) Office Manager (JJHC) (represented) position #1795 in the Public Works Department. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary sch edule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Tanya Williams 5/24/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 6/4/2019 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources L.Strobel Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 6/4/2019 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implic ations 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date th at your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22467 to add one (1) Administrative Services Assistant II (APVA) (represented) position at Salary Plan and Grade ZB5 1475 ($5,290 - $6,430) and cancel one (1) Community and Media Relations Specialist (APTC) (represented) vacant position #17116 at Salary Plan and Grade TB5 1511 ($5,482 - $6,663) in the Public Works Department. FISCAL IMPACT: This action will result in an estimated annual cost savings of $10,573. BACKGROUND: The duties and responsibilities for contracting in the Facilities and Fleet Services Divisions of the Public Works Department have grown significantly over the last several years. Many of the services that were procured under purchase orders have been moved to contracts. While this is the appropriate way to procure services, it has increased the contract workload, which includes execution and monitoring of over 150 contracts that provide services to County buildings, fleet, recycling/surplus, and custodial services. In order to balance the workload, the Public Works APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Adrienne Todd, (925) 313-2108 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier , Deputy cc: Adrienne Todd C. 46 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one Administrative Services Assistant II position and cancel one Community & Media Relations Specialist position BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Department requests to add an Administrative Services Assistant II (ASA II) for the Facilities Services Division. The ASA II will assist with contract solicitations, development of contracts through execution, monitoring contract expiration dates and payment limits, invoice tracking, and Labor Code 1771.1 compliance. The ASA II will be the contact for Facilities and Fleet staff for contracts in addition to assisting vendors with contract questions. The Public Works Department has a vacant Community and Media Relations Specialist position that has never been filled. There has not been a need to fill this position because the Departmental Community and Media Relations Coordinator has assumed these responsibilities. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Public Works Department will not have adequate staffing to address the increased workload in the contracting function. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 #22467 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed P300 22467 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 22467 DATE 5/14/2019 Department No./ Department Public Works Budget Unit No. 0079 Org No. 4031 Agency No. 65 Action Requested: ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22467 to add one (1) Administrative Services Assistant II (APVA) (represented) poisition at salary plan and grade ZB5 1475 ($5,291 - $6,431) and cancel one (1) Community and Media Relations Specialist (APTC) (represented) position #17116 at salary plan and grade TB5 1511 ($5,482 - $6,664) in the Public Works Department. Proposed Effective Date: 4/1/2019 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost ($10,573.00) Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY ($10,573.00) N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT N/A - Cost savings Department must initiate necessary adjustment and su bmit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Brian M. Balbas ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT L.Strobel 5/14/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 5/24/2019 Add one (1) Administrative Services Assistant II (APVA) (represented) position and cancel one (1) Community and Media Relations Specialist (APTC) (represented) position #17116 in the Public Works Department. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Tanya Williams 5/24/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 6/4/2019 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources L.Strobel Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 6/4/2019 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justific ation if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22474 to add one Director, Public Health Clinic Services (VVGS) position at salary plan and grade level ZA5-2177 ($10,601-$12,886) and cancel one vacant Director, Family, Maternal & Child Health (VCFA) position #9550 at salary plan and grade level ZA5-1912 ($8,154-9,912) in the Health Services Department. (Represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action has an annual cost increase of $13,780 with pension costs already included. The position will be funded by 75% Federal Financial Participation and 25% County General Fund. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting to add one Director, Public Health Clinic Services position and cancel one vacant Director, Family Maternal and Child Health (FMCH) position. The FMCH program participates in multiple funding sources that require time survey documentation for reimbursable activities. The position "Director of PHCS" is classified as APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sabrina Pearson, (925) 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: C. 47 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one Director, Public Health Clinic Services and cancel one Director, Family, Maternal & Child in the Health Services Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) a skilled medical professional (SMP) for the Medi-Cal administrative time survey and the Title 19 survey. This allows for a reimbursement rate of 75% on specific enhanced time survey codes. This increased matching allows for a greater drawing down of federal funds to offset the impact to the county general fund. In addition to the cost savings this expands the expertise of the Director position to support the management of nursing activities. The FMCH program currently has a total 16 public health nurses and 2 nurse managers. Under the current model of an FMCH Director, the department has participated in a matrix management model where the current Director of PHCS provides consultation and expertise for the FMCH program regarding nursing responsibilities. The new position will be responsible for Clinical and Programmatic oversight of three programs: California Children’s Services (CCS), Women, Infants and Children (WIC), and Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health (MCAH) Programs.Duties includes developing budgets and monitoring program expenditures to ensure compliance with budgets and applicable State and/or Federal regulations; allocating fiscal and personnel resources to maximize program effectiveness and establishing and maintaining communications with various public health advisory boards. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Public Health Clinics will not have a Director with the overall responsibility for the management and administration of public health clinical programs. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 22474 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed P300 22474 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 22474 DATE 5/23/2019 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0450 Org No. 5826 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add one Director, Public Health Clinic Services (VVGS) position and cancel one vacant Director, Family, Maternal & Child Health position in the Health Services Department. Proposed Effective Date: 6/12/2019 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated wit h request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $ 13,780 Net County Cost $0 Total this FY $1,148 N.C.C. this FY $0 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT: 75% Federal Financial Participation and 25% County General Funds Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Sabrina Pearson ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 06/05/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 06/05/2019 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Huma n Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the Department ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22448 to add one (1) Building Plan Checker 1 (FRWA) (represented) position at salary plan and grade TB5 1208 ($4,061.48 - $4936.75) in the Department of Conservation and Development. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. The cost associated with this position is approximately $92,457/year. Of this amount, approximately $17,805 is attributed to retirement costs. This position will be funded by Land Development fees. BACKGROUND: The permit and plan check numbers have steadily increased over the last four (4) years. The Department of Conservation and Development ended FY 2017/18 with permit and plan check numbers totaling 27,588. This is compared to 23,931 in FY 14/15; 25,566 in FY 15/16, and 26,043 in FY 16/17. With the increased trend in building permits and plan check activities, it is operationally critical for DCD to add another Building Plan Checker position to help address the increasing workload. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kelli Zenn, 925-674-7726 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier , Deputy cc: Sylvia Wong C. 48 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:ADOPT Position Adjustment to add one (1) Building Plan Checker I in the Department of Conservation and Development. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without the additional Building Plan Checker I position, the Department of Conservation and Development cannot guarantee efficient, timely and accurate plan check service for our customers. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No impact. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 22448 Add Bldg Plan Chkr I MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed P300 22448 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 22448 DATE 4/1/2019 Department No./ Department Conservation & Development Budget Unit No. 0280 Org No. 2682 Agency No. 38 Action Requested: Add one (1) Building Plan Checker I (FRWA) position at s alary plan and grade TB5 1208 ($4,061.48 - $4936.75) in the Department of Conservation and Development. Proposed Effective Date: 07/01/2019 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $92,457.00 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $0.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT NA Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. John Kopchik ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT BR for JE 4/25/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 5/30/2019 ADD one (1) Building Plan Checker I (FRWA) position at salary plan and grade TB5 1208 ($4,061.48 - $4936.75) in the Department of Conservation and Development. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Eva V. Barrios -Gaipa 5/30/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 6/5/2019 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources /s/ Julie DiMaggio Enea Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 6/5/2019 No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No.22470 to add one Utilization Review Manager (VWHG) position at salary plan and grade level ZZX-1003 ($11,806-$14,351) and cancel one vacant Health Plan Nurse Program Director (VRFA) position #16318 at salary plan and grade level ZZX-1003 ($11,806-$14,351) in Health Services. (Represented) FISCAL IMPACT: This action has no financial impact; the positions requested to add and cancel have the same salary schedule. Funding is 100% Contra Costa Health Plan. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting to add one Utilization Review Manager position and cancel one vacant Health Plan Program Director position #16318 in the Contra Costa Health Plan Division. The Utilization Review Unit is responsible for gathering, evaluating and monitoring of the information that pertains to patient services and treatment. These activities review different sections of patient care, timeliness of services, and if the appropriate measures were administered correctly related to the needs of the patient. This change would allow for the division APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sabrina Pearson, (925) 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: C. 49 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one Utilization Review Manager and cancel one Health Plan Nurse Program Director position in the Health Services Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) to work as a stronger management team with two managers with clinical knowledge and experience. The responsibilities of the new position is to oversee and participate in the development and implementation of effective and efficient standards, policies, protocols, processes, reports and benchmarks that support and further enhance utilization management and timely access to care; provide guidance on issues related to referral and authorization process, benefits interpretation, and other utilization issues; accountable for the oversight of delegated entities' utilization management and access to care; and perform annual oversight audits. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, Contra Costa Health Plan will not have adequate clinical management staff in the Authorization/Utilization Department to meet the demand and volume of patient care services. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 22470 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed P300 22470 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 22470 DATE 5/23/2019 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No.0860 Org No.6109 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add one Utilization Review Manager (VW HG) position and cancel one vacant Health Plan Nurse Program Director (VRFA) position #16318 in the Health Services Department . Proposed Effective Date: 6/12/2019 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $ 0 Net County Cost $0 Total this FY $ 0 N.C.C. this FY $0 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT: Cost Neutral Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Sabrina Pearson ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 6/5/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy Count y Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 06/05/2019 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Huma n Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the Department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22471 to add one Research and Evaluation Manager (APHB) position at salary plan and grade level B85-1874 ($7,856-$9,549) and cancel one vacant Health Services Planner/Evaluator-Level B (VCXD) position #17591 at salary plan and grade level Z82-1323 ($4,688-$7,683) in the Health Services Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action as an annual increase of $34,584 with $8,526 in pension costs already included. 100% funded by Continuum of Care Planning grant. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting to add one Research and Evaluation Manager position and cancel one vacant Health Services Planner/Evaluator-Level B position #17591 in the Health, Housing and Homeless Division. As the federally designated lead agency for the homeless continuum of care (CoC), systems-level evaluation of our internally operated or community-based CoC programs, is a requirement of new and/or continued funding from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Currently, there is no capacity APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sabrina Pearson, (925) 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: C. 50 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one Research and Evaluation position and cancel one Health Services Planner/Evaluator-Level B position in the Health Services Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) within this division to do continuous research into best practices around services and housing which is needed to compete for federal and state funding. The new position is responsible to lead the research and evaluation efforts around homelessness for the county-wide homeless coordinated entry system of care; analyze systems and processes to identify areas of inefficiency, interact with other departments or external sources, and recommend changes and improvements to existing standards and procedures. In addition, the incumbent will supervise, coordinate and participate in the implementation of the organization, staffing and operational activities for an assigned research, evaluation and or health assessments. and perform the more technical and complex tasks of the work unit including providing solutions to user needs through the development and implementation of information system procedures. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Health, Housing, & Homeless Services Administration- Data and Evaluation Unit will not have the proper staffing to evaluate the systems to ensure program effectiveness while servicing our clients. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed P300 22471 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 22471 DATE 5/23/2019 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No.0463 Org No.5731 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add one Research and Evaluation Manager (APHB) position and cancel one vacant Health Services Planner/Evaluator-Level B (VCXD) position #17591 in the Health Services Department . Proposed Effective Date: 6/12/2019 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $34,854 Net County Cost $0 Total this FY $ 2,904 N.C.C. this FY $0 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT: 100% funded by Continuum of Care Planning grant. Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Sabrina Pearson ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 06/05/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 06/05/2019 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Huma n Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the Department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22475 to add one Substance Abuse Counselor (VHVC) position at salary plan and grade level TC5-1436 ($5,090-$6,187), add one Mental Health Clinical Specialist (VQSB) position at salary plan and grade level TC2-1384 ($4,980-$5,776) and add one Substance Abuse Lead Counselor (VHTC) position at salary plan and grade level TC5-1503 ($5,439-$6,611) in Health Services. (Represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action has annual cost of $426,682 with $92,272 in pension costs already included. The requested positions will be funded entirely through an interdepartmental agreement between Employment and Human Services Department and Health Services' Behavioral Health, Alcohol and Other Drugs services for FY 2019-2020. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting to add one Substance Abuse Counselor, one Substance Abuse Lead Counselor, and One Mental Health Clinical Specialist positions. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Program (SAMWORKS) through California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids' Welfare to Work participants APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sabrina Pearson, (925) 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: C. 51 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Add Varied Permanent Positions in the Health Services Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) can receive substance abuse, mental health and psychiatric medication management readily within a network of Alcohol and Other Drugs Services contracted SAMWORKS community-based providers. The positions will be physically based full time at one of the four Employment and Human Services Department worksites. They will be primary responsible in providing mental health and substance abuse screening, referrals, care coordination, and psychiatric medication management referrals for clients referred to SAMWORKS; acting as a liaisons with California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids staff at their assigned Employment and Human Services Department worksite including Supervisors, and Social Workers as well as with all Alcohol and Other Drugs Services contracted providers. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, Behavioral Health Division will violate the Interdepartmental Agreement with Employment and Human Services Department and will not have the adequate staff to conduct the services to the clients and ensure neutrality. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 22475 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed P300 22475 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 22475 DATE 5/23/2019 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0466 Org No. 5911 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add one Substance Abuse Counselor (VHVC), add one Substance Abuse Lead Counselor (VHTC) and add one Mental Health Clinical Specialist (VQSB) positions in Health Service Department. Proposed Effective Date: 6/12/2019 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $426,682 Net County Cost $0 Total this FY $426,682 N.C.C. this FY $0 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT:100% funded by Employment and Human Services Department Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Sabrina Pearson ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 06/05/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 06/05/2019 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22476 to add one Homeless Services Specialist (V9SD) position at salary plan and grade level ZB5-1404 ($4,931-$5,994), add one Community Health Worker Specialist (VKTA) position at salary plan and grade level TC5-1103 ($3,660-$4,449), add one Medical Social Worker I (X4WB) position at salary plan and grade level 255-1369 ($4,762-$5,788) and add two Public Health Nurse (VVXA) positions at salary plan and grade level LT2-1832 ($9,903-$11,484) in Health Services. (Represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action has an annual cost of $786,578 with $176,696 in pension costs already included. Funded entirely by Whole Person Care Grant. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting to add one Homeless Services Specialist, one Community Health Worker Specialist, one Medical Social Worker I, and two Public Health Nurse positions. These positions will support a new inpatient diversion program, aimed at reducing inappropriate hospitalizations and therefore APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sabrina Pearson, (925) 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: C. 52 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Add Varied Permanent Positions in the Health Services Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) reduce associated costs at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center. These positions will be part of a multi-disciplinary team of five members that will work in the Emergency Room with hospital staff to identify patients who need additional support to maintain their health and keep from repeat hospital admissions. The new positions will be responsible for obtaining information and offering referrals regarding the County health systems and services to the homeless and the public, provide necessary health information to clients, facilitate discharge planning activities and assists with necessary placements and make appropriate patient referrals on suspected emotional or physical problems. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Whole Person Care program within Health Services will not have adequate staffing to provide the appropriate level of health care services to the community. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: N/A AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 22476 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed P300 22476 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 22476 DATE 5/23/2019 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0450 Org No. 5754 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add the following full-time permanent positions: one Homeless Services Specialist (V9SD), one Community Health Work er Specialist (VKTA), one Medical Social Worker I (X4WB), and two Public Health Nurses (VVXA), in Health Services Department. Proposed Effective Date: 6/12/2019 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $786,578 Net County Cost $0 Total this FY $786,578 N.C.C. this FY $0 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Funded 100% Whole Person Care Grant Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Sabrina Pearson ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 06/05/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt sala ry schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resourc es Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 06/05/2019 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the Department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 22473 to add one full-time Senior Disease Intervention Technician (V7VB) (represented) position at salary plan and grade TC5 1480 ($5,316.76 - $6,462.55) in the Health Services Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this request would be cost neutral since the position will be funded from the salary and benefit cost savings of the position being released to the requesting union. The current position is predominately supported (75%) by State STD Prevention funding, as well as 20% from AIDS prevention Education and 5% from Ryan White funding. BACKGROUND: Teamsters, Local 856 has requested the release of a current County employee who is filling a Senior Disease Intervention Technician position, for a one year period beginning July 1, 2019 and ending June 30, 2020. The Union will reimburse the County for all employment costs incurred by the County during the employee’s paid leave of absence. The County has agreed to the release and a Union Business Leave Agreement has been finalized. Considering the needed training, state certification and the APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: Jo-Anne Linares, Sylvia Wong Tam, Glynis Hughes, Daniel W. Peddycord C. 53 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one Sr. Disease Intervention Technician position in the Health Services Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) volume of work as specified below, a permanent position is needed in the meantime to ensure ongoing community services and compliance with mandates. The Department has identified a need for ongoing staffing support in this area after the term of the agreement with Teamsters, and is therefore requesting the addition of a permanent position. This position will support State mandated investigation activities related to reports of communicable disease; specifically syphilis, gonorrhea and chlamydia. The State STD Control Branch has time bound requirements regarding investigation and reporting per the CDC, including 7 day and 30 day time frames. Newly passed legislation, SB1152, which requires syphilis and HIV screening in all homeless patients leaving Emergency Departments goes into effect in July. The program is anticipating an increase in required investigation among our hardest to reach population. Therefore, full staffing is required for the program to meet these time sensitive mandates and continue to provide community services that assist in the treatment, prevention and mitigation of communicable diseases. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Department will not be able to backfill behind a release of an employee and will not have ongoing support for the increasing communicable disease services mandated by the State. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 22473 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed P300 22473 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 22473 DATE 5/30/2019 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0450 Org No. 5816 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add one full-time Senior Disease Intervention Technician (V7VB ) position in the Health Services Department. Proposed Effective Date: 6/12/2019 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $ 0 Net County Cost $0 Total this FY $0 N.C.C. this FY $0 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT: Cost neutral due to T856 paying for S&B costs of another Sr. DIT position to be release to the union for a one year period. Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Jo-Anne Linares ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 06/05/2019 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 06/05/2019 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the Department ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year -to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefit s Costs : b. Support Cost s : (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c . Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c . financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resource s Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/198 to grant an exception to Contra Costa County Salary Regulations Section 4.1, and adjust the salary step of the incumbent in the classification of Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt (2KD1), position number 14469, from step four to step five of salary range B8E 2376 ($13,615.54 - $16,549.78) effective at date of promotion June 3, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately $14,000 in increased salary and benefit costs, of which $3,700 is attributable to employer pension costs. BACKGROUND: On June 3, 2019, the incumbent was promoted to a position in the classification of Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt. The incumbent was receiving outstanding performance pay (OPP) and as a result would receive only a 3% increase in pay if the standard rule were applied, rather than a minimum of 5% which is typical for a promotion. Therefore, the Department requests approval to grant an exception to the County's Salary Regulations to allow the incumbent to be placed at step five of the classification's salary range. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the recommended action is not approved, the Department will not be able to appropriately compensate the incumbent. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jason Chan, (925) 957-2234 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: C. 54 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diana Becton, District Attorney Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution No. 2019/198 Authorizing an Upward Salary Step Adjustment AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/198 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed Resolution 2019/198 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/198 In The Matter Of: Adjusting the Salary Step of an Incumbent in the Classification of Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt (2KD1). WHEREAS, Section 4.1 (Salary-On Promotion) of the Contra Costa County Salary Regulations states, "Any employee who is appointed to a position of a class allocated to a higher salary range than the class he previously occupied, shall receive the salary in the new salary range, which is next higher than the rate he was receiving before promotion. In the event this increase is less than five (5) percent, the employee’s salary shall be adjusted to the step in the new range which is five (5) percent greater than the next higher step, if the new range permits such adjustment"; and WHEREAS, the incumbent in the Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt (2KD1) position #14469 was promoted to that position on June 3, 2019 and placed at step four according to the salary regulations rule on promotion; and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County District Attorney has requested the incumbent be placed at step five of the Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt (2KD1) salary range; and WHEREAS, the County Administrator's Office approves of this specific request to grant an exception to the Salary-On Promotion regulation for the recently appointed incumbent of the Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt (2KD1) position. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Board of Supervisors does hereby grant an exception to Section 4.1 (Salary-On Promotion) of the Salary Regulations, so that the incumbent of position #14469 shall be moved from step four to step five of the salary range for the Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt (2KD1) classification, effective June 3, 2019. Contact: Jason Chan, (925) 957-2234 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/197 to grant an exception to Contra Costa County Salary Regulations Section 4.1, and adjust the salary step of the incumbent in the classification of Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt (2KD1), position number 3669, from step four to step five of salary range B8E 2376 ($13,615.54 - $16,549.78) effective at date of promotion June 3, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately $14,000 in increased salary and benefit costs, of which $3,700 is attributable to employer pension costs. BACKGROUND: On June 3, 2019, the incumbent was promoted to a position in the classification of Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt. The incumbent was receiving outstanding performance pay (OPP) and as a result would receive only a 3% increase in pay if the standard rule were applied, rather than a minimum of 5% which is typical for a promotion. Therefore, the Department requests approval to grant an exception to the County's Salary Regulations to allow the incumbent to be placed at step five of the classification's salary range. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the recommended action is not approved, the Department will not be able to appropriately compensate the incumbent. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jason Chan, (925) 957-2234 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: C. 55 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diana Becton, District Attorney Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution No. 2019/197 Authorizing an Upward Salary Step Adjustment AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/197 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed Resolution 2019/197 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/197 In the Matter Of: Adjusting the Salary Step of an Incumbent in the Classification of Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt (2KD1). WHEREAS, Section 4.1 (Salary-On Promotion) of the Contra Costa County Salary Regulations states, "Any employee who is appointed to a position of a class allocated to a higher salary range than the class he previously occupied, shall receive the salary in the new salary range, which is next higher than the rate he was receiving before promotion. In the event this increase is less than five (5) percent, the employee’s salary shall be adjusted to the step in the new range which is five (5) percent greater than the next higher step, if the new range permits such adjustment"; and WHEREAS, the incumbent in the Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt (2KD1) position #3669 was promoted to that position on June 3, 2019 and placed at step four according to the salary regulations rule on promotion; and WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County District Attorney has requested the incumbent be placed at step five of the Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt (2KD1) salary range; and WHEREAS, the County Administrator's Office approves of this specific request to grant an exception to the Salary-On Promotion regulation for the recently appointed incumbent of the Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt (2KD1) position. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors does hereby grant an exception to Section 4.1 (Salary-On Promotion) of the Salary Regulations, so that the incumbent of position #3669 shall be moved from step four to step five of the salary range for the Senior Deputy District Attorney - Exempt (2KD1) classification, effective June 3, 2019. Contact: Jason Chan, (925) 957-2234 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Jami Napier, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County, a lease with Center Point, Inc., at the County owned building located at 1515 Market Ave., San Pablo. The term of this lease is six months for approximately 2,500 square feet of rentable office space at the rate of $1,500 per month. FISCAL IMPACT: 80% Medi-Cal, 14% AB 109, 6% Substance Abuse Block Grant Funds BACKGROUND: Anka Behavioral Health filed for bankruptcy on April 29, 2019, which forced it to stop providing services to offer rehabilitation and treatment to adult residents of the County with substance abuse issues. Center Point, Inc., will continue to offer rehabilitation and treatment services to combat social problems such as substance abuse, poverty, unemployment and homelessness for adult residents of the County. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Julin Perez, 925. 957-2460 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 56 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE a Lease with Center Point, Inc., for office space at 1515 Market Ave., San Pablo. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this lease is not approved, Center Point, Inc., will not be able to offer rehabilitation and treatment services to combat social problems such as substance abuse, poverty, unemployment and homelessness for adult residents of the County. ATTACHMENTS Lease 1 LEASE 1515 Market Avenue San Pablo, California This lease is dated June 1, 2019 and is between the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”) and CENTER POINT, INC., a California corporation (“Lessee”). Recitals A. The County is the owner of the property located at 1515 Market Avenue, San Pablo, including the parking lot and improvements thereon (the “Premises”). B. Lessee desires to lease the Premises to offer rehabilitation and treatment services to combat social problems such as substance abuse, poverty, unemployment and homelessness. The parties therefore agree as follows: Agreement 1. Lease of Premises. In consideration of the rents and subject to the terms herein set forth, the County hereby leases to the Lessee and the Lessee hereby leases from the County, the Premises, subject to all easements and encumbrances of record. 2. Term. The “Term” of this lease is six (6) months, commencing June 3, 2019 and continuing through November 30, 2019. 3. Early Termination. If the Service Contract is terminated for any reason, the Term of this lease will end upon the earlier to occur of (i) the expiration of the Initial Term or the Renewal Term, as applicable, and (ii) sixty days after the termination of the Service Contract. 4. Rent. Each month during the Term, Lessee shall pay rent to the County in the amount of $1,500.00, without offset or demand on or before the first day of each month. Rent for any partial month will be prorated at the rate of 1/30th of the applicable monthly rent per day. 5. Additional Payment Terms. a. Late Rental Payments: In the event Lessee fails to pay County any amount due under this lease within five (5) days after such amount is due, Lessee shall pay to County a late charge of One Hundred and No/100 Dollars ($100) per occurrence (the “Late 2 Charge”), plus interest on the unpaid balance at a rate of one and one-half percent (1.5%) per month, from the date the payment was due and payable until paid in full. Lessee shall pay all Late Charges as additional rent on or before the date the next installment of rent is due. County and Lessee hereby agree that it is and will be impracticable and extremely difficult to ascertain and fix County’s actual damage from any late payments and, thus, that Lessee shall pay as liquidated damages to County the Late Charge specified in this Section, which is the result of the parties’ reasonable endeavor to estimate fair average compensation for the late payment (other than attorneys’ fees and costs). County’s acceptance of the Late Charge as liquidated damages does not constitute a waiver of Lessee’s default with respect to the overdue amount or prevent County from exercising any of the rights and remedies available to County under this lease. b. Form and Place of Payment: Lessee shall pay all rents and fees by personal check, certified check, or money order, payable to the County of Contra Costa, by delivering same on or before due date to Contra Costa County, Public Works Department – Real Estate Division, 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez, California 94553, or at such other place as County may designate from time to time. c. Returned Checks: If a check written by Lessee is returned for insufficient funds, County may impose a reasonable service charge in addition to any Late Charge and in addition to any charges imposed by the bank. County may require Lessee to pay rent by certified check or money order if Lessee’s bank or banks have returned one or more personal checks within the preceding twelve (12) month period. d. Definition of Rent: “Rent” means all amounts due from Lessee to County under this lease. 6. Use. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Premises may be used by the Lessee only for the operation and maintenance of a multi-purpose service center for homeless people. Lessee may not use the Premises for any other purpose without the prior written consent of the County. Any use of the Premises other than as described herein without the County’s prior written consent is a default of this lease. 7. Utility Obligations. The Lessee shall pay utility providers directly for all utilities used or consumed on the Premises by Lessee or its subtenants, including, but not limited to gas, water, electricity, garbage disposal, janitorial services, landscaping, and telephone services. 8. Condition of Premises. a. Commencement Date. The Lessee is leasing the Premises in an “as is” physical condition with no warranty, express or implied, on the part of the County as to the condition of the Improvements, the condition of the soil or the geology of the soil. 3 b. During Term. The Lessee shall maintain the Premises in accordance with Section 9, Maintenance and Repairs. 9. Maintenance and Repairs. a. Roof and Exterior of Premises. The County shall keep the roof and exterior of the Premises in good order, condition, and repair, and shall maintain the structural integrity of the Building, including the exterior doors and their fixtures, closers and hinges, exterior windows, glass and glazing, used in the Premises. b. Interior of Premises. The Lessee shall keep and maintain the interior of the Premises in good order, condition and repair, but Lessor shall repair damage to the interior caused by its failure to maintain the exterior in good repair, including damage to the interior caused by roof leaks and/or interior and exterior wall leaks. The County may install and maintain an alarm system, if deemed necessary by County. c. Utilities. The Lessee shall repair and maintain the electrical, lighting, water and plumbing systems in good order, condition and repair. The County is responsible for maintaining the plumbing system beyond the perimeter of the Premises. d. HVAC. The County shall maintain and repair the heating, ventilating, and air- conditioning (HVAC) systems. e. Parking; Exterior Lighting. The Lessee shall maintain the parking lot and exterior lighting system in good order, condition and repair. f. Fire Extinguishers. The County is providing fire extinguishers for the Premises in accordance with the direction received from the fire marshal. Lessee shall maintain, repair, and replace the fire extinguishers. g. Code Violations. The County is responsible for correcting any code building violations that may exist in the Premises, provided the County is not responsible for correcting building code violations that arise out of a change in Lessee’s use or occupancy of the Premises. 10. Covenant against Liens. Neither Lessee nor Lessor may permit any mechanic’s, material man’s, or other lien against the Premises, or the property of which the Premises forms a part, in connection with any labor, materials, or services furnished or claimed to have been furnished. If any such lien is filed against the Premises, or property of which the Premises forms a part, the party charged with causing the lien will cause the same to be discharged, provided however, that either party may contest any such lien, so long as the enforcement thereof is stayed. 11. Quiet Enjoyment. Provided the Lessee is in compliance with the terms of this lease, the County covenants that the Lessee will peaceably and quietly have, hold, and enjoy the Premises during the Term. 4 12. Assignment and Sublease. The Lessee may not assign this lease or sublease the Premises or any part thereof at any time during the Term. 13. Alterations and Additions. Lessee may not make any alterations, erect any additional structures, or make any improvements on the Premises without the prior written consent of the Director of Public Works or his or her designee. In the event Lessee makes alterations or constructs additions that violate the conditions contained in this lease (an “Unauthorized Addition”), at the County’s sole discretion, Lessee shall remove any Unauthorized Addition at Lessee’s sole cost and expense. If Lessee is required to remove any Unauthorized Addition, Lessee, at its sole cost and expense, shall restore the Premises to the conditions existing immediately prior to the existence of the Unauthorized Addition, or such other condition designated by the County in its election. If Lessee is not required to remove any Unauthorized Addition, such Unauthorized Additions shall remain on and be surrendered with the Premises on expiration or termination of this lease. If Lessee wishes to make any alterations, erect any additional structures, or make any additional improvements to the Premises as provided in this Section, Lessee may not commence construction until Lessee has the prior written consent of the County. In addition, a Notice of Lessor Non-Responsibility must be posted and recorded by Lessee during construction in accordance with Civil Code Section 3094. Lessee shall mail a copy of such Notice of Lessor Non-Responsibility to Lessor upon filing it with the County Recorder. 14. Insurance. a. Liability Insurance. Throughout the Term, the Lessee shall maintain in full force and effect, at its sole expense, a comprehensive general liability or commercial general liability insurance program covering bodily injury (including death), personal injury, and property damage. The limits must be not less than one million dollars per occurrence and two million dollars aggregate. The policy must name the County, its officers, agents and employees, individually and collectively, as additional insureds. The liability insurance maintained by the Lessee must be primary. b. Property Insurance. The County will maintain property insurance coverage on its real property. The Lessee has no interest in the proceeds of insurance on the County’s real property, improvements, equipment, or fixtures. The Lessee shall sign all documents necessary or proper in connection with the settlement of any claim or loss by the County. The Lessee shall maintain in full force and effect, at its sole expense, a standard All Risk policy, which may exclude earthquake and flood, to insure its own personal property, contents, improvements and betterments within or on the Premises. The coverage must be for not less than 90% of the actual cash value of the personal property. The Lessee shall name the County as an additional insured and loss payee with respect to the improvements and betterments. 5 c. Worker’s Compensation and Employer’s Liability Insurance. The Lessee shall maintain in full force and effect, at its sole expense, (i) statutory California Workers’ Compensation coverage including a broad form all-states endorsement, and (ii) employer’s liability coverage for not less than one million dollars per occurrence for all employees engaged in services or operations at the Premises. d. Evidence of Insurance. Within thirty days of execution of this lease, the Lessee shall provide to the County, on a form approved by the County, an original copy of a Certificate of Insurance. The Certificate of Insurance must certify that the coverage required by this lease has been obtained and remains in force for the period required by this lease. e. Notice of Cancellation or Reduction of Coverage. The Lessee shall cause all policies it is required to obtain under the terms of this lease to contain a provision that the County is to receive written notification of any cancellation or reduction in coverage at least thirty days prior to the effective date of such cancellation or reduction. Any such notification is to be sent to the County in accordance with Section 23. Notices. f. Waiver of Subrogation. Except as may be specifically provided elsewhere in this lease, the County and the Lessee hereby each mutually waive any and all rights of recovery from the other in the event of damage to the Premises or any personal property that is caused by acts of God, perils of fire, lightning, and the extended coverage perils, as defined in insurance policies and forms approved for use in the State of California. Each party shall obtain any special endorsements, if required by their insurer, to evidence compliance with this waiver. 15. Surrender of Premises. On the last day of the Term, or sooner termination of this lease, the Lessee shall peaceably and quietly leave and surrender to the County the Premises, along with their appurtenances and fixtures, all in good condition, ordinary wear and tear, damage by casualty, acts of God and circumstances over which the Lessee has no control excepted. 16. Abandonment. The Lessee may not vacate or abandon the Premises at any time during the Term. If the Lessee abandons, vacates, or surrenders the Premises, or is dispossessed by process of law, or otherwise, the County may deem any personal property belonging to the Lessee that remains on the Premises to be abandoned. 17. Waste, Nuisance. The Lessee may not commit, or suffer to be committed, any waste upon the Premises, or any nuisance or other act or thing that may disturb the quiet enjoyment of any other occupant of the neighborhood in which the Premises is located. 18. Inspection. The County may enter the Premises at any time in an emergency and with 24-hour’s notice in a non-emergency to determine that (i) the Premises is being reasonably cared for, (ii) no waste is being made and that all actions affecting the Premises are done in the manner best calculated to preserve the Premises, and (iii) the Lessee is in compliance with the terms and conditions of this lease. 6 19. Destruction. If damage occurs that causes a partial destruction of the Premises during the Term from any cause, the County may, at its option, make repairs within a reasonable time. Partial destruction does not void this lease, except that the Lessee is entitled to a proportionate reduction in Rent while such repairs are being made. The proportionate reduction in Rent is to be calculated by multiplying Rent by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of square feet that are unusable by the Lessee and the denominator of which is the total number of square feet in the Premises. If the County does not elect to make repairs, this lease may be terminated by either party, without cost, obligation or liability to the other party, except as described herein. This lease will terminate in the event of a total destruction of the Premises. 20. Indemnification. The Lessee shall indemnify, defend and hold County, its officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all claims, costs and liability, for any damage, injury or death, including without limitation, all consequential damages from any cause whatsoever, to any person or the property of any person arising directly or indirectly from or connected with this lease, the Lessee’s operations, or the Lessee’s use or possession of the Premises, save and except claims or litigation arising through the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of County, its officers or employees, and shall make good to and reimburse County for any expenditures, including reasonable attorneys fees, County may make by reason of such matters. 21. Default. The occurrence of any of the following events is a default under this lease: a. The Lessee. i. The Lessee’s failure to pay Rent within five business days after the due date. ii. The Lessee’s failure to comply with any other material term or provision of this lease if such failure is not remedied within thirty days after receipt of a written notice from the County to the Lessee specifying the nature of the breach in reasonably sufficient detail (a “Notice of Default”). If the required cure of the noticed failure cannot be completed within thirty days, the failure to cure will not be deemed to be a default of this lease if the Lessee has attempted to cure the failure within the thirty-day period and has diligently and continuously attempted to complete the cure as soon as reasonably possible. In no event will the cure period extend beyond the sixty-day period after Lessee’s receipt of the Notice of Default. b. The County. The County’s failure to perform any obligation under this lease if the failure is not remedied within thirty days after receipt of a written notice from the Lessee to the County specifying the nature of the breach in reasonably sufficient detail. If the required cure of the noticed failure cannot reasonably be completed 7 within thirty days, a default will not be deemed to occur if the County has attempted to cure the failure within the thirty-day period and has diligently and continuously attempted to complete the cure as soon as reasonably possible. 22. Remedies. a. The County. Upon the occurrence of a default by the Lessee, the County may reenter and repossess the Premises and remove all persons and property from the Premises, after giving the Lessee written Notice of Default and in accordance with due process of law. b. The Lessee. Upon the occurrence of a default by the County, the Lessee may (i) terminate this lease by giving written notice to the County and quit the Premises without further cost or obligation to the County. 23. Notices. Any notice required or permitted under this lease shall be in writing and sent by overnight delivery service or registered or certified mail, postage prepaid and directed as follows: To County: Contra Costa County Public Works Department Attn: Principal Real Property Agent 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 To Lessee: Center Point, Inc. 135 Paul Drive San Rafael, CA 94903 Either party may at any time designate in writing a substitute address for that set forth above and thereafter notices are to be directed to such substituted address. If sent in accordance with this Section, all notices will be deemed effective (i) the next business day, if sent by overnight courier, or (ii) three days after being deposited in the United States Postal system. 24. Successors and Assigns. This lease binds and inures to the benefit of the heirs, successors, and assigns of the parties hereto. 25. Holding Over. In the event Lessee remains in possession of the Premises after the expiration of the Term, such holding over does not constitute a renewal or extension of this lease, but will be construed to be a tenancy from month to month on the same terms and conditions set forth in this lease, except that the monthly Rent due and payable hereunder will be 125% of the Rent payable as of the last month of the Term. 26. Time is of the Essence. In fulfilling all terms and conditions of this lease, time is of the essence. 8 27. Governing Law. The laws of the State of California govern all matters arising out of this lease. 28. Severability. In the event that any provision herein contained is held to be invalid or unenforceable in any respect, the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions of this lease will not in any way be affected or impaired. 29. Entire Agreement; Construction; Modification. Neither party has relied on any promise or representation not contained in this lease. All previous conversations, negotiations, and understandings are of no further force or effect. This lease is not to be construed as if it had been prepared by one of the parties, but rather as if both parties have prepared it. This lease may be modified only by a writing signed by both parties. The parties are executing this lease on the date set forth in the introductory paragraph. COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a CENTER POINT, INC., a California political subdivision of the State of corporation California By: _______________________ By: _______________________ Brian M. Balbas Sushma D. Taylor Director of Public Works Chief Executive Officer / President RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: _______________________ By: _______________________ Karen Laws Maurice Lee Principal Real Property Agent Chief Operating Officer By: _______________________ Julin Perez Senior Real Property Agent APPROVED AS TO FORM SHARON L. ANDERSON, COUNTY COUNSEL By: _______________________ Kathleen M. Andrus Deputy County Counsel \\PW-DATA\grpdata\realprop\Julin\New Leases 2019\San Pablo\1515 Market Ave San Pablo_lease V3.docx RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chief Information Officer, Department of Information Technology, to execute a contract with the City of Richmond to permit the County Department of Information Technology to provide radio communications maintenance services to the City of Richmond at the rate of $134.50 per hour plus the cost of any materials and equipment for the period July 1, 2019 until terminated. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement will result in revenue for DoIT's Telecommunications division. BACKGROUND: Effective, July 1, 2016, the County Department of Information Technology's (DoIT) Telecommunications Division executed an agreement with City of Richmond to provide radio communication services at the hourly rate of $128.00 through June 30, 2017. A second agreement was executed, effective July 1, 2017, through June 30, 2018, and a third agreement was executed, effective July 1, 2019, through June 30, 2019. Effective July 1, 2019, the Parties have agreed to execute a new agreement at the rate of $134.50 per hour, plus the cost of any materials and required equipment, with a scope of work allowing the County the right to, on an annual basis, adjust the hourly rates it charges City for radio services based on its costs to provide the Services, and will notify City in writing of any change in the hourly rate for subsequent fiscal APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: March Shorr, (925) 608-4071 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 57 To:Board of Supervisors From:Marc Shorr, Chief Information Officer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement for Radio Communication Services with City of Richmond BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) years (July 1 to June 30), and City shall either: (i) countersign the COUNTY correspondence indicating agreement with the adjusted hourly rate set forth therein, or (ii) provide County with a notice of termination under Section 9 (Termination) of the Agreement. Under this agreement, upon request, County Department of Information Technology's (DoIT) Telecommunications Division will continue to provide the City of Richmond with professional telecommunications and related radio programming services for the City of Richmond's subscriber console units, radio equipment changes and repair to dispatch radio consoles, mobile, and portable radios. The County may terminate the agreement at any time. The County has provided such services to the City of Richmond since 2014. In accordance with Administrative Bulletin No 104, no action shall be taken to initiate new or expanded programs or projects (such as providing services to another governmental entity for a fee) unless approved by the Board of Supervisors in advance. The County Administrator's Office has reviewed this request and recommends approval. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: A decision to not approve the recommendation will diminish revenue for the radio division, which could increase labor rates. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute an agreement containing modified indemnification language and accept reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $4,500 from The Center for Natural Land Management for the provision of noxious weed control services in Windermere Preserve located in San Ramon for the period April 1, 2019 through September 30, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement will reimburse the Agriculture Department in an amount not to exceed $4,500 for noxious weed control services in Windermere Preserve. There is no county match of funds, nor grant money involved. BACKGROUND: The Agriculture Department shall supply appropriate product to spray noxious weeds (artichoke thistle and purple-star thistle) with the use of backpack sprayers and all-terrain vehicles. The noxious weed control services are limited to those locations where noxious weeds have been located, identified and pose a public, economic, environmental or recreational nuisance. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If agreement is not approved, the Department would have a loss in revenue and the County may face the spread of noxious weeds. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 608-6600 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 58 To:Board of Supervisors From:Matt Slattengren Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement for Invasive Plant Management at Windmere Ranch Preserve RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute an agreement with the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) in an amount not to exceed $24,377 to place and service traps for the detection of the European Grapevine Moth from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This Agreement reimburses the Agriculture Department for all associated costs incurred for the implementation of the European Grapevine Moth Program, in an amount not to exceed $24,377. There is no County match of funds required. This revenue was anticipated in the FY 19/20 departmental budget. BACKGROUND: The County Department of Agriculture will provide all trapping materials, training of trappers, and deploy appropriate traps and service them at regular intervals according to the Insect Trapping Guide provided by the CDFA. If European Grapevine Moth (EGVM) is detected it will be delimited and controlled/eradicated. Costs will be reimbursed by CDFA. EGVM and it's vectors are a clear and present danger to Contra Costa County's agriculture commodity of grapes. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 608-6600 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 59 To:Board of Supervisors From:Matt Slattengren Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement #18-0619-005SF European Grapevine Moth Program CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve this Agreement will result in lost revenue for the Department and a possible threat to the agricultural grape industry in Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute Agreement #19-0142-000SA with the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) in an amount not to exceed $14,550 to reimburse the Agriculture Department for enforcement of service station laws for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of the Agreement will provide revenue to the Department in an amount not to exceed $14,550. There is no County match of funds. This amount has been anticipated and budgeted for FY 19/20. BACKGROUND: Gasoline service stations and others selling petroleum products are required by state law to meet advertising and signage requirements. Service stations are also required to provide water and air "free of charge" to customers and to provide handicap service to customers with some exceptions. This agreement will reimburse the Agriculture Department for services enforcing these laws. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: A negative action would cause loss of budgeted revenue and the department would still need to enforce the state regulated laws. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 608-6600 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 60 To:Board of Supervisors From:Matt Slattengren Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement #19-0142-000SA Measurement Standards/Petroleum Products RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute Agreement #19-0196-000SA Weighmaster Program with the California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) for reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $3,120 for the Agriculture Department to inspect recycling establishments licensed as weighmasters and determine compliance with Business Professions Code Section 12703.1 for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement reimburses the Department of Agriculture (Department) in an amount not to exceed $3,120. There is no County match of funds or cost share requirements. This revenue was anticipated in the Department's FY 19/20 budget. BACKGROUND: Common metal, precious metal and other recycling establishments require CDFA licensed weighmasters. They are required to provide current license application information and other information including the status of their weighmaster deputies. Transaction requirements also include thumb printing, photographic equipment, storm water permits, and Weights and Measures sealed commercial weighing devices. This agreement will reimburse the Department for conducting inspections to verify compliance with CDFA requirements, to document violations and take appropriate enforcement action, as needed. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925-608-6600 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 61 To:Board of Supervisors From:Matt Slattengren Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement #19-0196-000SA Weighmaster Program CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to accept Agreement #19-0196-000SA will cause a loss of revenue to the Department to enforce a mandated regulation. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Amendment Agreement #29-814-2 with the City of Concord, to amend Grant Agreement #29-814, as amended by Amendment Agreement #29-814-1, to increase the amount payable to the County by $75,472 from $128,514 to a new amount not to exceed $203,986 and to extend the termination date from June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2020 for the Coordinated Outreach, Referral and Engagement (CORE) Program to provide homeless outreach services to residents in Concord and Walnut creek. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this amendment agreement will allow the County to receive an additional amount not to exceed $75,472 from the City of Concord. There is no County match required. BACKGROUND: The CORE Program services locate and engage homeless clients throughout Contra Costa County. CORE teams serve as an entry point into the County’s coordinated entry system for unsheltered persons and work to locate, engage, stabilize and house chronically homeless individuals and families. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lavonna Martin, 925-608-6701 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 62 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment Agreement #29-814-2 with the City of Concord BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On September 12, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Agreement #29-814, as amended by Amendment Agreement #29-814-1, to receive funds from the City of Concord for the provision of the CORE Program, for the period from August 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. This Agreement included agreeing to indemnify and hold harmless the Contractor for claims arising out of County’s performance under this Contract. Approval of Agreement #29-814-2 will allow County to receive funds for homeless outreach services through June 30, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved, County will not receive funding and without such funding, the CORE program may have to operate at a reduced capacity. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the California Department of Community Services and Development to increase the payment limit to the County by $20,385 for an amount not to exceed $3,723,075 for Low Income Home Energy Assistance Programs, with no change to term October 1, 2018 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This grant is 100% funded with federal dollars passed through California Department of Community Services and Development. The CFDA number is 93.568. No county match required. The state agreement number is 19B-5005 / amend 2 and the County agreement number is 39-806-41. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County has received funding from the State Department of Community Services and Development for 25 years, wherein the County provides energy bill assistance payments and weatherization services to County residents who are income-eligible to receive said services. The funding sources include Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), the Energy Crisis APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB, 925-681-6304 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Nelly Ige, Sam Mendoza C. 63 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:2018-2020 Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program Funding Amendment 2 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Intervention Program (ECIP), the Department of Energy (DOE), the Low Income Weatherization Program (ILIWP) and the Toilet Retrofit Program (TRP). The Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) partners with the County's Department of Conservation and Development to provide energy saving home improvements to low-income families throughout unincorporated Contra Costa County, as well as the County’s nineteen cities. The energy savings measures may provide homes with hot water heaters, furnaces, refrigerators, microwaves, doors, windows, fluorescent light bulbs, weather stripping, ceiling fans, and attic insulation. Homes receive a blower door test (a diagnostic tool to locate and correct air infiltration), and homes with gas appliances receive a combustion appliance safety test that checks for carbon monoxide gas leakage. Homes with gas appliances are provided with a carbon monoxide alarm. This funding also includes the Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP) where residents of the County can qualify for a credit on their energy bills. These programs use income based eligibility. The income levels are based on the Federal Fiscal Year 2017 Poverty Guidelines. Once eligibility is determined, clients with no hot water, no heat, or are in danger of having their power shut off are served as emergencies. Service is then based on clients with the lowest income, highest energy burden and families with at least one resident who is considered vulnerable population. The Board of Supervisors approved receipt of initial funding on September 11, 2018 (c.53) in the amount of $1,906,289. The Board approved an amendment to accept additional funds on February 26, 2019 (c.51). This board order is to approve an amendment to increase the payment limit by $20,385. The State routinely adds funding to these contracts as federal budgets are finalized. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County may not receive funding to operate LIHEAP. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment and Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau energy program supports one Contra Costa County community outcome - Outcome #4: "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing." This outcome is supported by the provision of home energy assistance to keep households warm in winter and to increase household energy efficiency. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Grant Agreement #29-549-5 with John Muir Health, including indemnification of John Muir Health, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $50,000 for respite care services for homeless adults provided at the Philip Dorn Respite Center for the period from May 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this agreement will allow the County to receive an amount not to exceed $50,000 from John Muir Health for support to the Philip Dorn Respite Center through December 31, 2019. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: The Philip Dorn Respite Center, as a Community Benefit Program, located in Concord, is a respite care program for homeless adults who are discharging from local hospitals and require medical stabilization services. Respite care refers to recuperative services for those homeless persons who may not meet medical criteria for hospitalization, but who are too sick or medically vulnerable to reside in an emergency shelter APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lavonna Martin, 925-608-6701 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 64 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Grant Agreement #29-549-5 from John Muir Health BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and cannot be returned to the streets. The goal of the program is to get all homeless persons off the street and help them to achieve their highest level of self-sufficiency. Approval of Grant Agreement #29-549-5 will allow the County to continue to receive support for the Philip Dorn Respite Center through December 31, 2019. This Agreement includes agreeing to indemnify John Muir Health for any claims arising out of the County’s performance under the agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Agreement is not approved the County will not be able to receive funding for services at the Philip Dorn Respite Center. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with the Special Investigator General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (SIGTARP), including modified indemnification language, for use of the Sheriff's Range Facility commencing with execution of the contract through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: No net county cost - 100% Participant fees BACKGROUND: Local, state, and federal law enforcement officers are required to complete firearms qualifications on a regular basis. The Office of the Sheriff has a firing range and classroom that can be used by other law enforcement agencies for firearms qualifications when not in use by County staff. The recommended contract provides for use of the Sheriff's Range Facilities, including firearms range and classroom, for firearms qualification of this government agency and their employees. The contract includes mutual indemnification language. The contract agency will pay a per day fee for access to the Sheriff's Range Facility. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Negative action on this request would mean a loss of revenue for the County and a valuable loss of services for outside agencies. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sandra Brown 925-335-1553 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 65 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Range Use Contract RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/187 approving the application to the California Natural Resources Agency to obtain Green Infrastructure Program grant funds under the State of California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018 (Proposition 68), as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Pablo area. (District 1) FISCAL IMPACT: County Service Area (CSA) M-17, Montarabay will match $10,000 and the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District will match $15,000 for the project. The grant application funding request will not exceed $1,100,000. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Carl Roner (925)313-2213 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Sonia Bustamonte-BOS, Warren Lai- Deputy, Slava Gospodchikov - Engineering Services , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts C. 66 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:ADOPT Resolution Approving the Application for California Natural Resources Agency Grant for Montarabay park. BACKGROUND: The State’s Proposition 68, upon passage by the voters in 2018, created a grant program with an emphasis on multibenefit green infrastructure investments in or benefiting disadvantaged or severely disadvantaged communities. The purpose of the proposed Proposition 68 grant will be to fund the engineering, landscape design, permitting, and construction of a green infrastructure project which will provide drainage to the Montarabay parking lot. The facility’s parking lot, which is 1.82 acres in size, is completely paved and does not have any drainage facilities. During much of the winter it is flooded by rainfall, restricting parking and access to the community center. The adjacent ballfield does not dry out until late summer. These flooding events limit public access to the facility during the winter months and interfere with food distribution events that are held in the Montarabay parking lot on a monthly basis. The lack of site drainage makes maintenance of the overall facility more difficult and costly. The proposed improvement will also improve the appearance of the site and reduce traffic speeds in the parking lot. Portions of the adjacent Montalvin Manor area are considered a disadvantaged community and the grant application will receive a higher score due to this fact. The grant will pay for the engineering, landscape design, permitting, and construction of the bioswales or other green infrastructure and the drainage pipeline. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, Public Works will be unable to pursue funding for the project and ultimately will be unable to implement the green infrastructure and drainage project. The resulting winter flooding of the Montarabay parking lot will continue to limit public access to the facility. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2019/187 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed: Resolution No. 2019/187 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/187 In The Matter Of: Adopt Resolution Approving the Application to the California Natural Resources Agency to obtain Green Infrastructure Program grant funds under the State of California Drought, Water, Parks, Climate, Coastal Protection, and Outdoor Access for All Act of 2018 (Proposition 68), Montalvin Manor Area. (98% California Natural Resources Agency Proposition 68 and 1% County Service Area (CSA) M-17 and 1% Flood Control and Water Conservation District Funds.) (District 1) WHEREAS, the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have provided funds for the program shown above; and WHEREAS, the California Natural Resources Agency has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of this grant program, establishing necessary procedures; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Natural Resources Agency require a resolution certifying the approval of application(s) by the Applicant’s governing board before submission of said application(s) to the State; and WHEREAS, the Applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors (Governing Body): Approves the filing of an application for the Montarabay Green Infrastructure and Drainage Project; and1. Certifies that Applicant understands the assurances and certification in the application; and2. Certifies that Applicant or title holder will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project(s) consistent with the land tenure requirements; or will secure the resources to do so; and 3. Certifies that it will comply with all provisions of Section 1771.5 of the California Labor Code; and4. If applicable, certifies that the project will comply with any laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), legal requirements for building codes, health and safety codes, and disabled access laws, and that prior to commencement of construction all applicable permits will have been obtained; and 5. Certifies that Applicant will work towards the State Planning Priorities intended to promote equity, strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and promote public health and safety as included in Government Code Section 65041.1; and 6. Appoints the Public Works Director, or designee, as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project(s). 7. Contact: Carl Roner (925)313-2213 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Sonia Bustamonte-BOS, Warren Lai- Deputy, Slava Gospodchikov - Engineering Services , Carl Roner- Special Districts, Rochelle Johnson - Special Districts RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Standard Agreement #28-849-7 (State #18-10866) with the California Department of Public Health, including full indemnification of the State of California to pay the County an amount not to exceed $2,532,688 for the County Public Health HIV Care and Minority AIDS Initiative Project, for the period from April 1, 2019 through March 31, 2024. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this Agreement will result in an amount not to exceed $2,532,688 of funding from the California Department of Public Health. No County funds are required. BACKGROUND: The goals of the California Department of Public Health, Office of AIDS are: 1) to minimize new HIV infections; and 2) to maximize the number of people with HIV infection who access appropriate care, treatment, support and prevention services. The services required by the HIV Prevention Program, scope of work, in this Agreement are consistent with, and are designed to support these goals. On July 19, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Standard Agreement #28-849-4 (as amended APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 67 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement #28-849-7 with the California Department of Public Health BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) by Amendment Agreement #28-849-5 and #28-849-6) with the California Department of Public Health, for County to provide residents of Contra Costa County access to medical and support care services, including outreach and treatment under the HIV Care Program and Minority AIDS Initiative project, for the period from April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2019. Approval of Contract #28-849-7 will provide residents of Contra Costa County access to medical and support care services, including outreach and treatment under the HIV Care Program and Minority AIDS Initiative project, for the period from April 1, 2019 through March 31, 2024, including agreeing to indemnify and hold the State harmless for claims arising out of the County’s performance under the Agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will not receive the necessary funding to support: 1) the reduction in transmission of HIV; 2) prevention services that will reduce hospitalization; 3) support services to HIV positive individuals in their homes; or, 4) compliance with State and Federal requirements for reporting of communicable disease. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Standard Agreement #29-611-37 (State #18-90650) with the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) to pay County an amount not to exceed $625,000, for continuation of the Family Practice Residency Program at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period from June 30, 2019 through June 29, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this Agreement will result in a total of $625,000 from the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development for the Family Practice Residency Program, through June 29, 2022. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: Since 1978, the Board of Supervisors has approved agreements with the State to provide funds for the County's Family Practice Residency Program at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Contra Costa Health Centers. The OSHPD is authorized by the Son-Brown Health Care Workforce Training Action, Seciton 128225 to issues grants for the purpose APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D. 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 68 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement #29-611-37 with the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of supporting programs that train family and primary care physicians, osteopathic family physicians, primary care physician’s assistances, registered nurses and primary nurse practitioners to provide needed services in areas of unmet need with the State. Approval of Standard Agreement #29-611-37 will allow continuation of the Family Practice Residency Program at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, including training for an additional family practice resident for a three-year term. This agreement includes a provision requiring the County to indemnify and hold harmless the State for any and all claims arising out of performance of the agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County will not receive funding to continue providing family medicine training in the Family Practice Residency Program at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Contra Costa Health Centers. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to accept a grant in an amount not to exceed $25,000 from the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development to provide outreach, advising, and training to current and aspiring business owners for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: County to receive an amount not to exceed $ $25,000 from the Keller Canyon/Mitigation Trust Fund through the Department of Conservation and Development. BACKGROUND: Funding will provide outreach, advising, and training services from the Workforce Development Board, Small Business Development Center (SBDC), to low-to-middle income current or aspiring business owners. Beyond the low-to-middle income population, SBDC will seek to serve underserved target areas of the county including Pittsburg, Bay Point, and Antioch, including individuals with barriers to employment. Those barriers may include the recently incarcerated, military veterans, and the disabled. The goal is to encourage and assist those business owners to develop assets and build equity thus making it likely that they and their families will be economically self sufficient. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 69 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Department of Conservation and Development, Keller Canyon Mitigation Trust Fund Grant Funding CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without funding, expanded small business development advising and training would not be available to Pittsburg, Antioch, and Bay Point residents. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/192 to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with California Department of Aging to increase the payment limit by $21,445 to a new payment limit of $110,279 for Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act services, for the period October 1, 2018 through September 29, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: County to receive $110,279, including MI-1819-07 Amendmeht 1 amount of $21,445, from California Department of Aging. These additional funds and 100% Federal with no County match requirement. BACKGROUND: The California Department of Aging, Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA) funding will cover costs of providing outreach and enrollment assistance to individuals who may be eligible for Part D Low Income Subsidy and Medicare Savings programs administered by Medi-Cal. These activities will be performed by the Contra Costa County Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program (HICAP). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without additional funding, MIPPA services could not be expanded. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 70 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:California Department of Aging, Medicare Improvement for Patients and Providers Act Funding AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/192 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed Res 2019/192 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/192 In the Matter of: California Department of Aging, Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act Funding. WHEREAS, Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services provides Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA) services, and WHEREAS, California Department of Aging has made available additional funding for MIPPA services for the period October 1, 2018 through September 29, 2020. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors to approve and authorize the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute contract amendment MI-1819-07 Amendment No.1 with California Department of Aging to increase the payment limit by $21,445 to a new payment limit of $110,279 for Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act services for the period October 1, 2018 through September 29, 2020. Contact: Elaine Burres 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Agreement #28-528-59 with the County of Alameda, to pay County an amount not to exceed $1,848,177, for coordination of essential services to Contra Costa County residents with HIV disease and their families, for the period from March 1, 2019 through February 29, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this agreement will result in an amount not to exceed $1,848,177 of funding from the County of Alameda, as the Grantee of federal funds under the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act of 2009, Part A. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has designated the County of Alameda as “Grantee” for the purpose of administering the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment Modernization Act of 2006, Part A, funds for coordination of essential services to Contra Costa County residents with HIV Disease and their families. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 71 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Agreement #28-528-59 with the County of Alameda BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On November 6, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #28-528-57 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #28-528-58) with the County of Alameda Health Care Services Agency, as the fiscal agent for Ryan White CARE Act, Title I and Minority AIDS Initiative funds, for coordination of services to Contra Costa residents with HIV disease and their families, for the period from March 1, 2018 through February 28, 2019. Approval of Agreement #28-528-59 will provide continued funding for coordination of services through February 29, 2020. This agreement includes mutual indemnification. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved, County will not receive funds to provide coordination of essential services to Contra Costa County residents with HIV disease and their families. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE Resolution No. 2019/194 authorizing the Health Services Director, or designee, to submit an application and execute a grant award agreement, including any extensions or amendments thereof, pursuant to State guidelines, with the California Department of Housing and Community Development in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000 for the California Emergency Solutions and Housing (CESH) Program. FISCAL IMPACT: This is Contra Costa County’s second round allocating $1,200,000 for CESH funds for a grand total of $2,055,496. There is no matching contribution requirement for activities funded with CESH Program funds. BACKGROUND: The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) announced the availability of approximately $53 million in CESH Program funding through a Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA). CESH Program funding provides grants to administrative entities to assist persons who are experiencing or are at risk of homelessness pursuant to authorizing legislation SB 850 (Stats. 2018, ch. 48, § 4). HCD APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lavonna Martin, 925-608-6701 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 72 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Apply for and Accept California Department of Housing and Community Development Funding BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) administer the CESH Program with funding received from the Building Homes and Jobs Act Trust Fund (SB 2, Chapter 364, Statutes of 2017). CESH funds may be used for five primary activities: housing relocation and stabilization services (including rental assistance), operating subsidies for permanent housing, flexible housing subsidy funds, operating support for emergency housing interventions, and systems support for homelessness services and housing delivery systems. In addition, some administrative entities may use CESH funds to develop or update a Coordinated Entry System, Homeless Management Information System, or Homelessness Plan. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Contra Costa County will not receive an amount up to $1,200,000 in allocation from the State of California to provide emergency housing and/or services to person who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/194 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed Res 2019_194 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/194 In The Matter Of: A necessary quorum and majority of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County hereby consent to, adopt and ratify the following resolution: WHEREAS the State of California (the "State"), Department of Housing and Community Development ("Department") issued a Notice of Funding Availability ("NOFA") dated March 21, 2019 under the California Emergency Solutions and Housing Program (Program, or CESH Program); and WHEREAS Contra Costa County Health Services Department ("Applicant") is an Administrative Entity designated by the Continuum of Care to administer California Emergency Solutions and Housing Program funds; and WHEREAS the Department may approve funding allocations for the CESH Program, subject to the terms and conditions of the NOFA, Program requirements, and the Standard Agreement and other contracts between the Department and CESH grant recipients; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: If Applicant receives a grant of CESH funds from the Department pursuant to the above referenced CESH NOFA, it represents and certifies that it will use all such funds in a manner consistent and in compliance with all applicable state and federal statutes, rules, regulations, and laws, including without limitation all rules and laws regarding the CESH Program, as well as any and all contracts Applicant may have with the Department. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to receive a CESH grant, in an amount not to exceed $1,200,000 in accordance with all applicable rules and laws. Applicant hereby agrees to use the CESH funds for eligible activities as approved by the Department and in accordance with all Program requirements, and other rules and laws, as well as in a manner consistent and in compliance with the Standard Agreement and other contracts between the Applicant and the Department. The Health Services Director, or designee in the event that sufficient evidence of designation is provided to the Department, is authorized to execute the Standard Agreement and any subsequent amendments or modifications thereto, as well as any other documents which are related to the Program or the CESH grant awarded to Applicant, as the Department may deem appropriate. Contact: Lavonna Martin, 925-608-6701 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, on behalf of the Homeless Continuum of Care, to submit to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) a Consolidated Application #28-592-11 for the 2018 McKinney-Vento Continuum of Care Funding, along with necessary certifications and assurances, in an amount not to exceed $13,857,604 to provide supportive housing and services to homeless individuals and families in Contra Costa County for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of this Application could result in an amount not to exceed $13,857,604 of funding from HUD. No County match is required. BACKGROUND: Since 1996, the County, as the designated Continuum of Care Coordinator, has submitted an annual Consolidated Application for Continuum of Care funds. The Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division, Contra Costa Council on Homelessness (COH), and the community have prepared the Consolidated Application for the 2017 Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA). In 2018, Contra Costa County received nearly $14 million in McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lavonna Martin, 925-608-6701 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 73 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Application to HUD for McKinney-Vento Continuum of Care Funding BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) funds. The annual Consolidated Application, in response to the HUD NOFA for Continuum of Care Funding, is a primarily source of funding to Contra Costa County agencies for providing housing and services for the homeless. Historically, Contra Costa County has received our established “pro rata” need – all of which goes to supportive housing and services to homeless individuals and their families in Contra Costa County. Approval of Application #28-592-11 will allow County to apply for funds in an amount not to exceed $13,857,604 from HUD for supportive housing and services to homeless individuals in Contra Costa County through June 30, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this application is not approved, County will not receive McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance funds to support housing and services for homeless individuals. RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/454 approving and authorizing the District Attorney, or designee, to execute a contract, including any extensions or amendments thereof pursuant to state guidelines, with the California Victim Witness Compensation and Government Claims Board in an amount not to exceed $447,552 to fund Victim Witness Assistance Program Specialist positions for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: The District Attorney will receive $447,552 in revenue. 100% State funded. BACKGROUND: The Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (Board) administers the State's Victim Compensation Program (VCP), which reimburses victims of violent crimes for specific economic losses incurred as a result of crime. The Board, through Criminal Restitution Compacts, funds Victim/Witness Program Specialist positions that provide restitution specialists who works with the victim, the prosecutor, the Probation Department and the Court to ensure that offenders are ordered to pay restitution to the victim and the program when appropriate. Statute requires the APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jason Chan, (925) 957-2234 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 74 To:Board of Supervisors From:Diana Becton, District Attorney Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:California Victim Witness Compensation and Government Claims Board Funding for 7/1/19 - 6/30/22 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Court to impose restitution on behalf of the Board when an offender is convicted and the victim has received benefits from the VCP. If the victim's losses are unknown at the time of sentencing, statue requires that the restitution order include a provision that the amount will be determined at the direction of the court. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The District Attorney will be unable to apply for and accept the grant. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/454 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed Res 2019/454 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/454 IN THE MATTER OF: Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board Grant Award for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. WHEREAS, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors desires to enter into an agreement with the Victim Compensation and Government Claims Board (VCGCB) to continue the program to ensure restitution fines and orders are properly administered in accordance with applicable statues to provide restitution to victims of crimes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the District Attorney of the County of Contra Costa is authorized to submit an agreement to the VCGCB and is authorized to execute on behalf of the Board of Supervisors a Standard Agreement including any extensions or amendments thereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the grant funds received hereunder shall not be used to supplant expenditures previously authorized or controlled by this body. Contact: Jason Chan, (925) 957-2234 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board, to execute a contract amendment with DXC Technology Company, LLC, to increase the contract payment limit by $3,811,856 for a new contract payment limit of $26,923,367 and to extend the contract termination date from January 31, 2020 to January 31, 2023 to provide system support, operation, and maintenance of the CalWIN System, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: The additional $3,811,856 will be paid against renewable annual allocations through the CalWIN budget available to the County for the full term of the State Automated Welfare System Project. Contra Costa County's pro rata share ($26,923,367) is 4.65% of the overall project cost ($578,997,140). The cost of the County's share will be covered by 4.35% County, 53.38% Federal, and 42.27% State funds. BACKGROUND: Conta Costa County has been using the California Welfare Information Network (CalWIN) since 2005. CalWIN is currently managed and operated by the Welfare County Data Systems (WCDS) Consortium, representing 18 counties in California. The CalWIN system supports the delivery of services to APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 75 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:California Works Information Network (CalWIN) Project, DXC Technology Company LLC BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) applicants and beneficiaries of the State of California's public assistance programs and other County programs. The system automates program enrollment, eligibility determination, benefits payroll, reporting, and other case management functionality. WCDS provides support for the administration of programs including Medi-Cal, California Work Opportunity & Responsibility to Kids/Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (CalWORKs/TANF), CalFresh Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI), Foster Care, Refugee Cash Assistance (RCA), Kinship Guardianship Assistance Program (KinGAP), California Food Assistance Program (CFAP), General Assistance/General Relief (GA/GR), Adoption Assistance, and other health and human services programs or subprograms. WCDS has contracted with DXC Technology Company, LLC (formerly HP Enterprise Services) to provide development, maintenance, and operation of CalWIN to comply with regulatory and policy changes. Although CalWIN will be phased out by a single system, CalSAWS, for all 58 California counties, the new system will not be available until late 2022. Until then and through the transition to the new system, CalWIN must remain operational until all 18 Counties have completely converted to CalSAWS. This contract amendment and extension covers the transition period and will ensure continuous CalWIN support until the system is fully integrated into CalSAWS. CalSAWS is managed by a Joint Powers Authority (JPA), which will begin to operate on June 28, 2019. Approval of this contract amendment is needed before that date. This board order will ensure that DXC and CalWIN provide required services from January 31, 2020 through January 31, 2023 for ongoing system support, development, maintenance, and operations. Approving this Board Order and signing the attached signature page will extend the contract from January 31, 2020 through January 31, 2023 to continue CalWIN operations and will increase the payment amount limit. The Chair of the Board of Supervisors for each of the 18 CalWIN Counties sign one joint agreement. County Counsel has reviewed and approved this agreement as to form, and the full contract is available upon request. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: County is a member of the WCDS Consortium and has an obligation to participate and share the costs of operating CalWIN. Failure to provide the County's share would violate the terms that WCDS established with DXC and Consortium members. ATTACHMENTS Contract Amendment Signature Page for Chair of the Board RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to enter into worksite contractual/financial agreements with employers participating in the CCWORKS (Contra Costa Works) Subsidized Employment Program, whereby participating employers are reimbursed no more than $13 per hour (and no more than $20 per hour if employer pays above minimum wage) for those CalWORKs (California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids) clients worksited with the employers, during the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: CalWORKs participant wage reimbursements are funded with CalWORKs Single Allocation, which is 85% Federal and 15% State funds. Cumulative reimbursements are not to exceed total program reimbursements of $960,666. BACKGROUND: Based upon the success of the subsidized employment programs operated in response to Senate Bill (SB) 72, which extended the State reimbursement to counties for subsidized employment programs as authorized by Assembly Bill (AB) 98 (now AB 74), the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) developed and implemented the subsidized employment program known as CCWORKS for CalWORKs participants. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 76 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contra Costa Works (CCWORKS) Program BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Following guidelines and funding options of AB 98 and building upon the success of previous Subsidized Employment and Training (SET) programs operated under the American Recovery and Reimbursement Act, the CCWORKS program has been designed very similarly to other programs in the Bay Area. CalWORKs participants will be screened into the CCWORKS program and placed with local employers (for-profit, non-profit, and public agencies) who will have the responsibility for, under a contractual/financial worksite agreement, the payroll, associated taxes, and worksite compensation for participants approved and worksited within their organization. Employers will interview CCWORKS participants upfront and, if they meet the criteria for the position, will hire and train them in skills appropriate for the position in which they are placed. CCWORKS participants will receive a wage comparable to those workers performing the same or like duties at the worksite. The worksite agreement will be signed with the employer for each participant placed at the employers worksite. Under the CCWORKS program, EHSD will reimburse no more than $13 per hour to employers that pay minimum wage and no more than $20 per hour to employers that pay above minimum wage, for a minimum of 20 hours per week and at a maximum of 40 hours per week. No overtime will be subsidized. The individual contracts with each employer will state the reimbursement process and the reimbursement will be paid on the contractual timeline of six months. Monthly reimbursements will be submitted by participating employers for each client employed through the CCWORKS program. The invoices will be reviewed by EHSD CCWORKS staff and submitted to the EHSD Fiscal Unit for payment. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without approval, the CCWORKS program participants will have fewer employment opportunities and will continue reliance on public benefits. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to enter into worksite contractual/financial agreements with employers participating in the Expanded CCWORKS (Contra Costa Works) Subsidized Employment Program, whereby participating employers are reimbursed no more than $13 per hour (and no more than $20 per hour if employer pays above minimum wage), for targeted CalWORKS (California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids) clients worksited with employers during the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: Funded with $857,533 Expanded Subsidized Employment Allocation, which is 96% Federal and 4% State, for the Expanded Employment Program wages for CalWORKs participants. BACKGROUND: Based upon the success of subsidized employment programs in response to Senate Bill (SB) 72 which extended the State reimbursement to counties for subsidized employment programs as authorized by Assembly Bill (AB) 98 (now AB 74), the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) developed and implemented the subsidized employment program known as CCWORKS (Contra Costa Works) for CalWORKs participants. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres,608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 77 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Expanded Contra Costa Works (CCWORKS) Program BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Following the guidelines and funding options of AB 98 and building upon the success of previous Subsidized Employment and Training (SET) programs operated under the American Recovery and Reimbursement Act, the Expanded CCWORKS program has been designed very similarly to other programs operated in the Bay Area. Expanded Subsidized Employment targets Welfare to Work clients who are limited English proficient, challenged by domestic violence, have a criminal or arrest history, disabled veterans, pregnant and parenting youth, and those completing the family stabilization component. CalWORKs participants will be screened into the Expanded CCWORKS program and placed with local employers (for-profit, non-profit, and public agencies) who will have the responsibility for, under a contractual/financial worksite agreement, the payroll, associated taxes, and workers compensation for each Expanded CCWORKS program participant approved and worksited within their organization. Employers will interview eligible Expanded CCWORKS participants and, if they meet the criteria for the position, will hire and train them in skills appropriate for the position in which they are placed. Expanded CCWORKS participants will receive a wage comparable to those workers performing the same or like duties at the worksite. The worksite agreement will be signed with the employer or each participant placed at the employer's worksite. Under the Expanded CCWORKS program, EHSD will reimburse up to $13 per hour to employers that pay minimum wage and no more than $20 per hour to employers that pay above minimum wage, for a minimum of 20 hours per week to a maximum of 40 hours per hours week. No overtime will be subsidized. The individual contracts with each employer will state the reimbursement process and those reimbursements will be paid on the contractual timeline of six months. Monthly reimbursement invoices will be submitted by participating employers for each client employed through the Expanded CCWORKS program. The invoices will be reviewed by EHSD CCWORKS staff and submitted to the EHSD Fiscal Unit for payment. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without approval, the Expanded CCWORKS Program participants will have fewer employment opportunities and will continue reliance on public benefits. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or Designee, to execute a contract with Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, d/b/a Empower Retirement, for recordkeeping and administrative services for the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan for a three year term commencing on or after July 1, 2019, with two additional one year renewal options, with modified indemnification language, subject to approval as to form by County Counsel; and 1. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or Designee, to sign the Trust Agreement between Contra Costa County and Great-West Trust Company, LLC, to establish and administer an exclusive benefit trust fund for the assets of the Deferred Compensation Plan, subject to approval as to form by County Counsel. 2. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or Designee, to sign the Schwab Personal Choice Retirement Account Plan Application and Agreement with Charles Schwab & Co. Inc., containing mutual indemnification language, for Self-Directed Brokerage Account services. 3. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ann Elliott 925-335-1747 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: 457 Deferred Compensation Committee C. 78 To:Board of Supervisors From:Dianne Dinsmore, Human Resources Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company for Administrative Services for the 457 Deferred Compensation Plan RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) FISCAL IMPACT: The contract is funded by fees charged to participant 457 Deferred Compensation Plan accounts. There is no fiscal impact beyond overhead administrative support costs, which are partially offset through the plan. BACKGROUND: On February 26, 2019, the Board of Supervisors authorized the Human Resources Department to negotiate a three-year contract with Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company, d/b/a Empower Retirement, with regards to the Contra Costa County Deferred Compensation Plan (I.R.C. § 457( ("the Plan") for a three (3) year term commencing on or after July 1, 2019, with the option for two (2) additional one (1) year contract extensions. The anticipated contract with Empower sets forth the specific administrative and recordkeeping services that Empower will provide in connection with the Plan. Pursuant to the contract, Empower will provide enrollment support to the County and its employees. Empower will also provide for initial and ongoing education for those who choose to participate in the Plan ("Participants"), including face-to-face group sessions and on-on-one consultations. Participants will be provided access to a participant website that is customized to their needs and will provide Plan Participants with powerful tools that they can use 24/7. Among other options, Participants will be able to do the following on the participant website: transfer assets; make beneficiary designations; calculate estimated health care expenses based on individualized information; calculate estimated monthly retirement income and goals based on Participant's financial data; access information about investment options, such as prospectuses. Through Empower's services, Participants will be able to contact Empower through various means: Through the participant website, Participants will be able to have real time conversations with customer service representatives using Live Chat. By phone, Participants will be able to contact Empower service representatives through a toll-free number. To make it easier for employees to receive assistance, Empower's toll free customer service hours will include evenings and Saturdays. By a toll-free automated voice response system, Participants will be able to inquire or make account changes from a touch-tone telephone. Inquiry services available from the automated voice response system will use share prices, unit values and account balances that are as of the last calculated unit value/share price. Empower's customer service representatives and field onsite representatives are required to hold Financial Industry Regulatory Authority Series 6 and 63 licenses, meaning that, when authorized, they have the capacity to provide professional financial advice to Plan Participants. Empower will also provide educational and communication materials to Participants regarding financial investing, retirement options, and planning tools pursuant to the Plan. It will also make quarterly benefit statements available to Participants, including on the participant website, and circulate Plan notices. In addition, Empower will offer fully automated loan administration, making it easy for Participants to monitor as well as apply for loans. It will also provide distributions to Participants, process Participant rollover contributions and provide Participants with transaction and investment statements. Empower will also provide an annual report to the County concerning the services it has provided, investment information and benefit payments, among other information. It will also create a recordkeeping system online via Empower’s website for the County acting as Plan Sponsor that permits Plan Sponsor to communicate inquiries or changes while administering the Plan. As part of the transition to Empower for recordkeeping and administrative services, Empower will coordinate the transfer of records and assets from the Plan’s prior service provider and will reconcile asset values. A trust is maintained in connection with the Plan to which Plan contributions are made and held by a trustee. The Trust Agreement with Great-West Trust Company, LLC, provides that it will establish and operate the exclusive benefit trust fund for the Plan, which includes Plan contributions and assets. Great-West Trust Company, LLC will serve as the Trustee under the Trust Agreement and will manage and invest the trust fund for the exclusive benefit of Plan participants and their beneficiaries. The Trust Agreement sets forth the general duties and powers of Great-West Trust Company, LLC. Such duties and powers include, but are not limited to: receiving contributions; administering the exclusive benefit trust fund; making payments from the trust; transferring and accepting property for eligible rollovers; and various ministerial acts. The Schwab Personal Choice Retirement Account Plan Application and Agreement will allow Participants to continue to have the option of contributing funds to a Self-Directed Brokerage Account (“SDBA”) through Schwab. For those Participants with funds currently in a Schwab SDBA, the funds will continue to be held by Schwab. SDBAs allow Participants to exercise a higher level of control over their 457 Plan funds. Schwab will provide SDBA services pursuant to the terms in the Personal Choice Retirement Account Plan Application and Agreement, which contains mutual indemnification and arbitration clauses. Empower will provide recordkeeping and administrative services for the SDBAs offered through Schwab, subject to applicable fees, as described in the contract with Empower. After finalizing all provisions and investment options, the Committee will return to the Board of Supervisors for their approval and adoption of contracts with fund companies as needed. Following contract approval, the County will begin facilitation of communication and educational materials for the Plan Participants. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The extension of the County’s contract with its current recordkeeper, Mass Mutual, will soon end. Without a successor contract in place, the County will not have a contract in place for the performance of necessary recordkeeping and administrative services and many of the favorable terms and conditions of the current contract will be lost. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a non-financial contract with 1st Northern California Credit Union, a nonprofit corporation, including modified mutual indemnification language, to provide auto loan services for the Keeping Employment Equals Your Success Auto Loan Program, for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: None. This is a non-financial contract. BACKGROUND: The Employment and Human Services Department created the Keeping Employment Equals Your Success (KEYS) Auto Loan Program for California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids Act (CalWORKs) participants who need a personal automobile to complete their transition to self-sufficiency. The KEYS Auto Loan Program targets CalWORKs participants and in coordination with the 1st Northern California Credit Union (Credit Union), provides automobile loans for participants who meet loan criteria. This contract outlines the Credit Union's no-fee facilitation responsibilities. The KEYS Auto Loan Program is successful at helping participating CalWORKs clients remain employed and well on the road to self-sufficiency. The mutual indemnification clause of Contra Costa County General Conditions modifications have been approved by Contra Costa County Risk Management. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 8-4961 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 79 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with 1st Northern California Credit Union for KEYS Auto Loan Services CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Employment and Human Services Department will be unable to facilitate the provision of an automobile loan to qualified CalWORKs participants who have been unable to obtain an automobile loan through conventional means. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The services provided under this contract support all five of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes: (1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; (2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; (3)"Families that are Economically Self-Sufficient"; (4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and (5)"Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families” by providing transportation opportunities to qualified CalWORKs participants. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract with First Baptist Church of Pittsburg, California, in an amount not to exceed $2,202,788 for Head Start Delegate Agency childcare services for the period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is 100% federally funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (ACF). The Contractor is responsible for the local, non-cash, in-kind match of $527,492. These services require no additional pension costs to the County. CFDA #93.600 Contra Costa County Contract #33-499-50 BACKGROUND: On September 11, 2018 (C.50), the Board approved and authorized the submission of the 2019 Head Start grant application to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, ACF, to continue the provision APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6334 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Nelly Ige, Haydee Ilan, Teresita Foster C. 80 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:2019 Head Start Delegate Agency Contract Renewal BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of Head Start services in Contra Costa County. The grant included the plan submitted by the County's Head Start Delegate Agency, First Baptist Church of Pittsburg, California. This board order approves the funding for the delegate agency for the 2019 program year. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, contract will not be executed and Head Start services will not be provided by the First Baptist Church of Pittsburg, California. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment and Human Services Department Community Services Bureau supports three of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes - Outcome 1: Children Ready for and Succeeding in School, Outcome 3: Families that are Economically Self-sufficient, and Outcome 4: Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing. These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, or designee, to pay $22,256 to Friendly Cab Company, Inc for providing additional non-emergency taxi cab transportation services for Public Health clients and patients to and from medical appointments, checkups, wellness checkups, and mental health appointments for the period November 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Payment for services is funded 100% by State Funds. BACKGROUND: In May 2018, the County Administrator approved and the Purchasing Services Manager executed Contract #72-101-2, as amended by Contract Amendment #72-101-3, for the provision of non-emergency taxi cab transportation services for Public Health clients and patients to and from medical appointments, checkups, wellness checkups, and mental health appointments upon authorization by County for the period April 1, 2018 through APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dan Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 81 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Payment for Services Provided by Friendly Cab Company, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) March 31, 2019. Services were requested and provided beyond the payment limit of the contract. At the end of the contract period, charges of $22,256 had been incurred. The additional services were provided between November 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019. Because the contract limit has been reached, the Department cannot pay the provider under the contract for the additional services. The provider is nonetheless entitled to payment for the reasonable value of their services under the equitable relief theory of quantum meruit. That theory provides that where a person has been asked to provide services without a valid contract, and the provider does so to the benefit of the recipient, the provider is entitled to recover the reasonable value of those services. At the time of negotiations, the payment limit was based on target levels of utilization. However, the utilization during the term of the agreement was higher than originally anticipated. As such, the Department recommends that the Board authorize the Auditor-Controller to issue a one-time payment to Friendly Cab Company, Inc, in the amount of $22,256 for services provided from November 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The service provider will not be paid for services rendered to the Health Services Department. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Agricultural Commissioner, or designee, to execute an agreement containing modified indemnification language with the Regents of the University of California in an amount not to exceed $56,000 to receive Master Gardener Program Coordinator services for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: Expenses related to this agreement will be covered 100% by the Department's budgeted General Fund allocation. BACKGROUND: Under the general direction of the Director of the Department of Agriculture, the contractor shall coordinate the Master Gardener Program, including managing the program budget and volunteer training and providing oversight of public outreach efforts within the County. Contractor is responsible for keeping abreast of current research in all relevant areas. Specific duties include, but are not limited to: 1) implement volunteer training; 2) determine volunteer advanced training need; 3) select volunteers; 4) approve Master Gardener projects and evaluate for alignment with the University of California Cooperative Extension's (UCCE) Mission; 5) ensure compliance with the UC Master Gardener Administrative Handbook and Program APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 608-6600 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 82 To:Board of Supervisors From:Matt Slattengren Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:University of California Master Gardener Program Coordinator Agreement BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Guidelines; 6) manage the program budget, including setting fees, collecting registration money, purchasing program supplies; and 7) evaluate and keep records on program efficacy and outreach efforts. The agreement includes mutual indemnification. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve this request will result in the loss of efficiencies in the Master Gardener Program in Contra Costa County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Novation Contract #74-554-3 with NAMI Contra Costa, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $618,000, to provide a Family Volunteer Network Program to support families, significant others, and loved ones of consumers experiencing mental health issues for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, which includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2020, in an amount not to exceed $309,000. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% by Mental Health Services Act (MHSA). (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: Contractor will continue providing consultation and support to the Family Volunteer Network Program to support families in Contra Costa County who have loved ones with severe and persistent mental illness. This program addresses the unique needs of the participants in developing coping strategies and handling challenges posed by mental illness within their families. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Matthew White, M.D., 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 83 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #74-554-3 with NAMI Contra Costa BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On September 11, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #74-554-1, as amended by Contract Amendment #74-554-2, with NAMI Contra Costa for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2019 for the provision of support to the County’s Family Volunteer Network Program. Approval of Novation Contract #74-554-3 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows the Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, families will not receive the support they need from this vendor to support loves ones with mental illness. RECOMMENDATION(S): Acknowledge receipt of notice from Gastroenterology Associates of the East Bay Medical Group, Inc., a corporation, requesting termination of Contract #27-992, effective at the end of business on April 16, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II. BACKGROUND: On October 17, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-992 with Gastroenterology Associates of the East Bay Medical Group, Inc., for the provision of gastroenterology services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members and County recipients, for the period from October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2019. The Department received a letter from the Contractor, requesting termination of this Contract. In accordance with General Conditions, paragraph 5 (Termination), the Contractor served the Department 30 days written notice of cancellation of this contract. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: N Garcia, M Wilhelm C. 84 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Acknowledge Termination of Contract #27-992-1 with Gastroenterology Associates of the East Bay Medical Group, Inc. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #27-892-5 with Muir Orthopaedic Specialists, A Medical Group, Inc., a corporation, effective July 1, 2019, to amend Contract #27-892-4, to provide urgent care services in addition to orthopedic surgery services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members, with no change in the original payment limit of $4,000,000, and no change in the original term of November 1, 2018 through October 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This amendment is funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On November 6, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-892-4 with Muir Orthopaedic Specialists, A Medical Group, Inc. for the provision of professional orthopedic surgery services, for the period from November 1, 2018 through October 31, 2019. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #27-892-5 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron Mackey, 925-313-6004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C. 85 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #27-892-5 with Muir Orthopaedic Specialists, A Medical Group, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) will allow the Contractor to provide urgent care services in addition to orthopedic surgery through October 31, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, certain specialized professional health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County will not be provided. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Probation Officer, or designee, to execute a contract with Behavioral Interventions (B.I.), Incorporated, in the amount of $275,000 to provide electronic monitoring services and equipment for the period February 1, 2019 through January 31, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: $275,000, 100% General Fund BACKGROUND: U.S. Communities, now OMNIA Partners, is the largest cooperative purchasing organization for the public sector in the nation. All requests for proposals are competitively solicited and awarded. Behavioral Interventions (B.I.), Incorporated was awarded the Master Contract (#201844994) for electronic monitoring services with OMNIA effective February 1, 2019. Utilizing the cooperative purchasing contract guarantees Probation fair pricing and exceptional service. The Probation department has contracted with BI, Inc.in the past and the department has been pleased with the service provided. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Probation Department will not have an active contract with a vendor for electronic monitoring services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Danielle Fokkema, 925-313-4195 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 86 To:Board of Supervisors From:Todd Billeci, County Probation Officer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Behavioral Interventions (B.I.), Incorporated RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Waters Moving and Storage, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,000,000 to provide on-call moving and storage services for the period June 11, 2019 through May 31, 2022, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: This cost is to be funded through Facilities maintenance budgets. (100% General Fund) BACKGROUND: Public Works utilizes contractors for moving and storage services, including office landscape partitional furniture (OLP) repair, replacement, and adjustment. In the previous three years (2016-2018) over $6.6M was spent responding to department generated work requests requiring office moves, reconfigurations, and storage/retrieval of county assets or materials. As bid on Bidsync #1812-315, Waters Moving and Storage, Inc. was the second lowest responsible and responsive vendor and is one of two vendors selected for this commodity. Government Code Section 25358 authorizes the County to contract for maintenance and upkeep of County facilities. Facilities is requesting a three year contract. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Joe Yee (925) 313-2104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 87 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve a Contract with Waters Moving and Storage, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Waters Moving and Storage, Inc. will be able to negotiate rate increases on each anniversary of the effective date of this Contract by a factor equal to the rate of increase in the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco - Oakland area as published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the year immediately preceding, plus 2%. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, moving, storage and office furniture adjustment, repair and installation will not be performed. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Animal Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Bronwyn Purcell-DeAbreu, DVM, dba Veterinary Medicine Services, payment limit of $125,000 for veterinarian shelter services from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: Contract cost are $125,000 which are allocated through 37% User Fees, 54% City Revenue, 9% County General Fund. BACKGROUND: Contractor is responsible for providing medical care in our urgent and emergency veterinarian unit. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approved this amendment will result in the loss of critically required veterinarian services, along with endangering the lives of sheltered animal. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Arturo Castillo I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 88 To:Board of Supervisors From:Beth Ward, Animal Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Bronwyn Purcell-BeAbreu- Veterinary Medicine Services RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #76-549-4 with Yana Rebecca Wirengard, M.D., an individual, in an amount not to exceed $400,000, to provide general surgery services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No Rate increase) BACKGROUND: On May 1, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-549-3 with Yana Wirengard, M.D., to provide general surgery services at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers, including clinic coverage, surgical procedures, on-call and administrative support services, through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #76-549-4 will allow the contractor to continue to provide general surgery services at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers through June 30, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: A Floyd , M Wilhelm C. 89 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #76-549-4 with Yana Rebecca Wirengard, M.D. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring general surgery services at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers will not have access to Contractor’s services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #76-650 with Sanjay K. Shah, M.D., Incorporated, a professional corporation, in an amount not to exceed $900,000, to provide cardiology services for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Health Center patients, for the period from June 1, 2019 through May 31, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: Under Contract #76-650 the Contractor will provide cardiology services including consultation, training and clinic coverage for patients at CCRMC and Health Centers for the period from June 1, 2019 through May 31, 2021. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring care at CCRMC and Health Centers will not have access to Contractor’s cardiology services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D. 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: A Floyd , M Wilhelm C. 90 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #76-650 with Sanjay K. Shah, M.D., Incorporated RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #26-777-5 with Stephen Arnold, M.D., an individual, effective June 1, 2019, to amend Contract #26-777-3 (as amended by Amendment #26-777-4) to decrease the payment limit by $200,000, from $1,602,000 to a new payment limit of $1,402,000, with no change in the term of March 1, 2017 through February 29, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On February 7, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-777-3 (as amended by Contract Amendment Agreement #26-777-4) with Stephen Arnold, M.D., for the period from March 1, 2017 through February 29, 2020, for the provision of cardiology services including, but not limited to clinic coverage, consultation, inpatient sessions, training, on-call coverage, and reading cardiology studies at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC). Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #26-777-5 will decrease the payment limit by $200,000 to partially offset funding requirements for a new cardiologist who will begin providing services at CCRMC. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: A Floyd, M Wilhelm C. 91 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment Agreement #26-777-5 with Stephen Arnold, M.D. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract amendment agreement is not approved, CCRMC will not have sufficient funding required to add an additional cardiologist. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #26-752-4 with Denis Mahar, M.D., an individual, effective June 1, 2019, to amend Contract #26-752-3 to decrease the payment limit by $25,000, from $1,876,000 to a new payment limit of $1,851,000, with no change in the term of October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On October 18, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-752-3 with Denis Mahar, M.D., for the period from October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2019, for the provision of cardiology services including, but not limited to clinic coverage, consultation, inpatient sessions, training, on-call coverage, and reading cardiology studies at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #26-752-4 will decrease the payment limit by $25,000 to partially offset funding requirements for a new cardiologist who will begin providing services at CCRMC. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: A Floyd, M Wilhelm C. 92 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract Amendment Agreement #26-752-4 with Denis Mahar, M.D. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract amendment agreement is not approved, CCRMC will not have sufficient funding required to add an additional cardiologist. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #26-552-8 with Bailey T. Lee, M.D., an individual, in an amount not to exceed $376,000, to provide radiology services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 14, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-552-7 with Bailey T. Lee, M.D., for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2019, to provide radiology services for patients at CCRMC including consultation, on-call coverage, supervision and interpretation of Computed Tomography Scans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasounds, invasive procedures and plain films. Approval of Contract #26-552-8 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide radiology services, through June 30, 2021. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 925-370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: A Floyd , M Wilhelm C. 93 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-552-8 with Bailey T. Lee, M.D. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, Contractor will be unable to provide radiology services to patients at CCRMC and Health Centers. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-563-4 with JWG Consulting, LLC, a limited liability company, in an amount not to exceed $580,000, to provide consulting, training and technical assistance services to the Department’s Information Systems Unit, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On July 11, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-563-3 with JWG Consulting, LLC for the provision of consulting services including technical, operational support and training on Patient Financial Services, for the Health Services Department Information Systems Unit for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #23-563-4 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide consulting services on Patient Financial Systems for the Information Services Unit through June 30, 2021. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Wilson, 925-335-8700 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 94 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-563-4 with JWG Consulting, LLC CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Contract is not approved, the Information Systems Unit will not have access to Contractor’s consulting services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-475-7 with K.B.R., Inc. (dba Rash Curtis & Associates), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $450,000, to provide debt collection services for unpaid accounts for the Health Services Department for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. Contractor will be paid on a commission basis for debts it actually collects. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 13, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-475-6 with K.B.R., Inc. (dba Rash Curtis & Associates) for the provision of debt collection services for unpaid accounts for the Health Services Department, for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #23-475-7 will allow Contractor to continue providing debt collection services for unpaid accounts through June 30, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 925-957-5405 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C. 95 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-475-7 with K.B.R., Inc. (dba Rash Curtis & Associates) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County will not be able to receive payment for unpaid debt collections recovered by Contractor’s services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an agreement with Contra Costa County Office of Education (CCCOE) in an amount not to exceed $133,055 to provide educational liaison and support services for dependent youth for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement will increase department expenditures by $133,055, to be funded 100% by Federal funds. BACKGROUND: CCCOE operates the Foster Youth Services Coordinating Program (FYSCP) and is responsible for providing services in accordance with Education Code section 42920-25. Under this direction, CCCOE has contracted to serve pupils in foster care in Contra Costa County. Effective in January 2004, Assembly Bill 490 (Chapter 862, Statutes of 2003) established key provisions supporting the educational opportunities within the best interest of the children in foster care. The passage of Assembly Bill 854, in October of 2015, further clarified the requirements of operating an FYSCP. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gna Chenoweth 8-4961 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 96 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Contra Costa County Office of Education for Coordinating Educational Support for Dependent Youth BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Based on the similar mission of FYSCP and Employment and Human Services Department's Children and Family Services Bureau, a natural collaboration was established for serving the foster youth in Contra Costa County. This contract is intended to ensure all of the Contra Costa County foster youth continue to receive support for educational opportunities, in accord with Education Code sections 42921, 48853.5, and 49069.5. The purpose of this contract is to identify the specific and general responsibilities of each participating agency within the framework of Title IV-E of the Social Security Act. This contract conforms to applicable federal and state laws and shall be updated as required pursuant to any change in federal and state laws to ensure compliance. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without educational support, foster youth may experience problems transitioning in school and poor outcomes later in life, including higher unemployment, homelessness, and incarceration rates than their peers. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This Agreement supports four of the five community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; 3) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and 4) "Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families" by supporting the educational rights of children and youth in foster care. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an agreement with Contra Costa County Office of Education, in an amount not to exceed $50,000 to provide tutoring services to children in foster care for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will increase department expenditures by $50,000, to be funded 70% by 2011 Realignment and 30% by County General Funds. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County Office of Education (Agency) was selected through the competitive bid process, Request For Information (RFI) 630, by the Employment and Human Services Department's Children and Family Services Bureau (CFS) in 2017 for the 2018-2019 fiscal year. Agency provides tutoring services to children and youth in foster care in all Contra Costa County school districts. Under this renewal agreement, Agency must continue to provide qualified, trained, tutors who will serve Contra Costa County dependent children and youth in foster care and who request tutoring; ensure Education Liaisons and Agency staff work collaboratively with CFS Social Workers; and provide CFS a monthly report of all tutoring provided to each child receiving tutoring through this Agreement. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 8-4961 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 97 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Contra Costa County Office of Education for Tutoring Services to Children in Foster Care CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Children in Contra Costa County Foster Care will not receive State mandated tutoring services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract supports three of the five community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; and 5) “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families, by supporting the educational rights of children and youth in foster care. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with The West Contra Costa Youth Service Bureau, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $250,000 to provide Child Welfare Redesign Differential Response Path 2 Case Management services in East and West Contra Costa County for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will increase expenditures by $250,000 funded 100% by State Child Welfare Services Outcome Improvement Project-Realignment funds. BACKGROUND: This Contractor was selected as a result of the competitive bid process to continue implementation of the Differential Response Path 2 Case Management Program, which provides early intervention in the lives of families who have had a report of abuse or neglect. The Differential Response Program works with community-based and/or faith-based organizations to provide case management and home visiting services to high-risk families to address the issues that brought the family to the attention of Children and Family Services (CFS). Selected contractors provide services to impact the family's ability to safely care for their children and avoid the further need for interaction with and further investigation by CFS. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 8-4961 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C. 98 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with The West Contra Costa Youth Service Bureau for Differential Response Program Case Management Services CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Employment and Human Services will be unable to provide valuable services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This recommendation supports all five of the following children's outcomes: (1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; (2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; (3)"Families that are Economically Self-Sufficient"; (4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and (5)"Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families” by providing community-based services to families to deter continued Children and Family Services intervention. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #24-681-2(36) with God’s Grace Caring Home, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $369,564, to provide augmented board and care services, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Mental Health Realignment funds. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of the County's population by providing augmentation of room and board, and twenty-four hour emergency residential care and supervision, to eligible mentally disordered clients, who are specifically referred by the Mental Health Program staff and who are served by County Mental Health Services. On May 1, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #24-681-2(35) with God’s Grace Home, to provide augmented board and care services for County-referred mentally disordered clients for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Matthew White, M.D., 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: E Suisala , M Wilhelm C. 99 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #24-681-2(36) with God’s Grace Caring Home, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract #24-681-2(36) will allow the Contractor to continue providing augmented board and care services, through June 30, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, augmented board and care services will not be provided to County-referred mentally disordered clients by this Contractor. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a Purchase Order with Groupware Technology, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $424,231 for the purchase of Cisco UCS Blades and Smartnet Support Services for the period May 27, 2019 through May 26, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: Funded 100% by the Hospital Enterprise Fund I budget. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department (HSD) Information Technology currently owns Cisco UCS Blades at the Martinez and Pittsburg Data Centers and utilizes Smartnet Support Services. The new hardware is replacing End-of-Life (EOL) Cisco UCS Blades for the Data Centers. The new equipment suite will provide high-performance security for encrypted traffic, robust traffic inspection at high outputs, capabilities to support faster connection speeds, and upgrade capabilities for additional expansion capacity to support expected future growth in storage requirements for the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Wilson, 925-335-8700 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Renee Nunez C.100 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order for Groupware Technology, Inc. for Cisco UCS Blades and Support CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Quality of patient care could be negatively impacted without the purchase of this product suite. If the EOL equipment is not replaced, HSD will be unable to accommodate secured faster data link connectivity or provide future expansion capacity for infrastructure supporting the Epic Upgrade taking place in October 2019. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a Purchase Order with Groupware Technology, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $102,312 for renewal of Pure Storage maintenance and support services for the period from May 27, 2019 through May 26, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I budget. BACKGROUND: Health Services Information Technology currently owns Pure Storage arrays, which stores ccLink electronic health records (EHR) data. This renewal will continue the maintenance and support for Epic Cache Storage and EHR data through May 26, 2020. The County and Pure Storage entered into an End User Agreement dated April 21, 2017, which includes terms and conditions governing the County’s use of Pure Storage products and services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Wilson, 925-335-8700 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Marcy Wilhelm C.101 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Groupware Technology, Inc. for Pure Storage Maintenance and Support Renewal RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-226-15 with Boehm and Associates, a partnership, in an amount not to exceed $150,000 to provide consulting and technical assistance on workers’ compensation laws and third party liability recovery for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% by third-party revenue from collection activities. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On July 24, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-226-14 with Boehm and Associates for the provision of consulting and technical assistance for workers’ compensation laws and recovery rights under personal injury law in third-party liability cases, for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #23-226-15 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide consulting and technical assistance on workers’ compensation laws and recovery rights under APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 925-957-5410 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C.102 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-226-15 with Boehm and Associates BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) personal injury law in third-party liability cases, through June 30, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the Department will not have access to Contractor’s expertise on workers’ compensation laws and recovery rights under personal injury law in third-party liability cases. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Groupware Technology, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $136,510 for the purchase of Pure Storage FlashArray hardware and support services for the period from May 27, 2019 through May 26, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I budget. BACKGROUND: Health Services Information Technology (IT) currently owns Pure Storage arrays, which stores ccLink electronic medical records (EMR) data. This purchase is for Pure Storage arrays to increase capacity of existing storage to house all associated Epic EMR data and expand the Epic Cache Storage. Additional disc storage will expand the amount of online medical record data available to providers and provide a faster storage system. This purchase includes maintenance and support. The County and Pure Storage entered into an End User Agreement dated April 21, 2017 which includes terms and conditions governing the County’s use of Pure Storage products. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Wilson, 925-335-8700 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Renee Nunez C.103 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Groupware Technology for Pure Storage Hardware and Support CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without this purchase, Health Services IT will be unable to adequately store patient Epic EMR patient data and other critical healthcare information. This could lead to loss of existing data through overwriting or loss of new data due to an inability to store it. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #26-724-9 with National Research Corporation (dba NRC Health), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $175,000, to provide consulting and technical assistance on patient satisfaction through measurement and improvement surveys for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 5, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-724-8 with National Research Corporation (dba NRC Picker), to provide patient experience survey services as required by the State of California Medicaid 1115 Waiver Program at CCRMC. Services include mail surveys for inpatient, outpatient clinics and emergency departments, with additional email and phone surveys for outpatient providers only, with the intent to survey 100% of patient visits for up to 125 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: A Floyd, M Wilhelm C.104 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #26-724-9 with National Research Corporation (dba NRC Health) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) providers, including physicians and nurse practitioners, for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. This contract includes mutual indemnification. Approval of Contract #26-724-9 will allow the contractor to continue to provide survey services including additional transitional discharge calls to patients through June 30, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, survey services will not be performed by this Contractor and CCRMC will not be in compliance with California Medicaid 1115 Waiver requirements. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Human Resources, or designee, to execute a contract with CPS HR Consulting, in an amount not to exceed $200,000 for test rental services for the period of October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: The costs incurred under this contract are funded through charges to the operating departments as part of recruitment costs. BACKGROUND: The County operates under a merit system as laid out in Division 33 of the County Ordinance Code. In a merit system, a recruitment will include one or more types of assessments, such as multiple choice exams. CPS HR Consulting was established in 1985 as a self-supporting public agency providing a full range of integrated HR solutions to federal, state and local governments, public safety, special districts and nonprofit organizations. The organization's focus on public sector means their services meet the requirements of the merit system. The County frequently uses CPS HR Consulting's test rental services. The retroactive effective date of this contract is necessary in order to pay past invoices. In accordance with Administrative Bulletin 605.3, service contracts exceeding $100,000 require the approval of the Board of Supervisors. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Barbara Vargen 925-335-1766 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.105 To:Board of Supervisors From:Dianne Dinsmore, Human Resources Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with CPS HR Consulting for Test Rental Services CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the Human Resources Department will be unable to rent test materials to conduct recruitments in order to provide hiring lists for County departments to fill their vacancies. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Interagency Agreement #23-228-13 with the Moraga-Orinda Fire Protection District, a public agency, in an amount not to exceed $278,244, to provide prehospital emergency medical paramedic first responder services and emergency ambulance services, for the period October 1, 2019 through September 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Measure H. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: Moraga Fire Protection District has provided paramedic ambulance services in Emergency Response Area 3 continuously since 1971 and has provided this service at the paramedic level since initiation of paramedic services in Contra Costa County in 1977. In July 1997, Moraga and Orinda Fire Districts consolidated into one new district. On April 19, 2016, the Board of Supervisors approved Interagency Agreement #23-228-11 (as amended by Contract Amendment/Extension APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 925-313-9554 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.106 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Interagency Agreement #23-228-13 with Moraga-Orinda Fire Protection District BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Agreement #23-228-12) with Moraga-Orinda Fire Protection District, to provide Prehospital Emergency Medical Paramedic First Responder services and Emergency Ambulance services, for the period from October 1, 2015 through September 30, 2019. Approval of Interagency Agreement #23-228-13 will allow Moraga-Orinda Fire District to continue providing services through September 30, 2022. This contract includes mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this Contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, Prehospital Emergency Medical Paramedic First Responder and Emergency Ambulance services will not be provided by Moraga-Orinda Fire District. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the allocation of $210,000 from Fiscal Year 2018/19 Housing Opportunities for Persons with HIV/AIDS (HOPWA) funds to Resources for Community Development for the new construction and development of the 1313 Galindo Apartments project in the City of Concord, as recommended by the Conservation and Development Director. APPROVE the allocation of $844,665 from Fiscal Years 2018/19 and 2019/20 Housing Opportunities for Persons with HIV/AIDS (HOPWA) funds to Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond and Eden Housing, Inc., for the new construction and development of the Legacy Court project in the City of Richmond, as recommended by the Conservation and Development Director. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Federal Funds. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's HOPWA funds are provided to the County on a formula basis through the City of Oakland. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kristin Sherk (925) 674-7887 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.107 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Allocation of Fiscal Year 2018/19 and 2019/20 Housing Opportunities for Persons with HIV/AIDS (HOPWA) Funds BACKGROUND: The National Affordable Housing Act (Public Law 101-625, approved November 28, 1990) authorizes the Housing Opportunities for Persons with HIV/AIDS (HOPWA) program to provide states and localities with resources to devise long-term comprehensive strategies for meeting the housing needs of persons with HIV/AIDS and related diseases. The City of Oakland (City) is the HOPWA grant recipient for Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. The City allocates HOPWA funds between the counties based on the number of HIV/AIDS cases. These funds may be used for site acquisition, rehabilitation and new construction of affordable housing, supportive services, housing information services, rent and utility subsidies, and certain other housing related activities for low-income persons living with HIV/AIDS in both the incorporated and unincorporated areas of the County. The Contra Costa Consortium (Consortium), which is comprised of County staff and staff from the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek, makes HOPWA funding recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. The Consortium met on May 16, 2019 and recommend the following allocations. 1313 Galindo Apartments Project The Consortium recommends that the Board of Supervisors allocate $210,000 in 2018/19 HOPWA funds to Resources for Community Development (RCD) for the new construction and development of 62 affordable rental units including 39 one-bedroom units, 19 two-bedroom units (including one manager's unit), and 4 three-bedroom units. Thirty six of the units will be affordable to households at or below 50% area median income (AMI) and twenty-five of the units will be affordable to households at or below 30% AMI. Twelve of the units are proposed to be reserved for homeless veterans and one unit will be a HOPWA unit. In accordance with HOPWA regulations, RCD will work with different HIV/AIDS service providers including the County Health Services Department HIV/AIDS Program. The recommended HOPWA allocation is contingent on the following: Close of construction financing, including an executed loan between RCD and the County, by December 31, 2020. 1. Execution of a HOPWA services agreement between the County and RCD (and their property manager) by December 31, 2020. 2. Funds expended by June 30, 2021.3. If these contingencies are not met, the HOPWA funds will be recaptured. As proposed, $200,000 in HOPWA funds will be expended at construction close. The remaining $10,000 will cover project specific delivery costs incurred by the County, including legal fees. Additional sources of financing include the following: City of Concord $7,800,000 Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention 2,630,484 Affordable Housing Sustainable Communities 5,364,623 Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program 915,000 Low Income Housing Tax Credits 15,693,572 Private Permanent Loan 303,247 Recontributed Developer Fee 3,189,257 Deferred Developer Fee 278,803 Gap (Funding to be determined)4,564,520 Total Sources (including HOPWA)$40,939,506 The Concord City Council endorsed and supported the project with $7.8 million in funding for the project. Legal documents for the project will include a loan agreement, a promissory note, a deed of trust and security agreement, a regulatory agreement, an intercreditor agreement, and a subordination agreement. These documents will be submitted for Board of Supervisor approval at a later date. Legacy Court Project The Consortium recommends that the Board of Supervisors allocate $844,665 in HOPWA funds to Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond (CHDC) and Eden Housing Inc. (Eden) for the new construction and development of 43 affordable rental units including 21 one-bedroom units, 11 two-bedroom units (including one manager's unit), and 11 three-bedroom units. The one-bedroom units will be designed to accommodate special needs populations including five HOPWA units. In accordance with HOPWA regulations, CHDC and Eden will work with different HIV/AIDS services providers including the County Health Services Department HIV/AIDS Program. The recommended FY 2018/19 HOPWA allocation of $224,665 is contingent on the following: Close of the construction financing, including an executed loan between CHDC/Eden and the County, by December 31, 2020. 1. Execution of a HOPWA services agreement between the County and CHDC/Eden by December 31, 2020. 2. Funds expended by June 30, 2021.3. If these contingencies are not met, the HOPWA funds will be recaptured. The recommended FY 2019/20 HOPWA allocation of $620,000 is contingent on the following; County executing an agreement for HOPWA funds with the City of Oakland.1. Close of the construction financing, including an executed loan between CHDC/Eden and the County, by December 31, 2021. 2. Execution of a HOPWA services agreement between the County and CHDC/Eden by December 31, 2021. 3. Funds expended by June 30, 2022. 4. As proposed, $834,665 in HOPWA funds will be expended at construction close. The remaining $10,000 will cover project specific delivery costs incurred by the County, including legal fees. Additional sources of financing include the following: City of Richmond $1,036,013 Permanent Loan/Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds 6,533,000 Richmond CalHelp 78,803 Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program 420,000 State Water Resources Board/Orphan Site Cleanup Account Grant 1,653,667 Environmental Protection Agency Grant 200,000 Veterans Housing and Homeless Prevention 3,051,962 Multifamily Housing Program 4,077,227 Deferred Developer Fee 1,111,770 General Partner Equity 766,448 Low Income Housing Tax Credits 10,256,680 Gap (Funding to be determined)1,465,335 Total Sources (including HOPWA)$31,485,570 The Richmond City Council endorsed and supported the project with over $1 million in funding for the project. Legal documents for the project will include a loan agreement, a promissory note, a deed of trust and security agreement, a regulatory agreement, an intercreditor agreement, and a subordination agreement. These documents will be submitted for Board of Supervisor approval at a later date. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Board does not approve these allocations of HOPWA funds, 1313 Galindo Apartments and Legacy Court affordable housing projects may not be viable. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The recommendation supports one or more of the following children's outcomes: (1) Children Ready for and Succeeding in School; (2) Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood; (3) Families that are Economically Self Sufficient; (4) Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing; and (5) Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #77-097-1 with Genomic Health, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $150,000, including changes to the County Standard Indemnification clause, to provide diagnostic laboratory testing services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members for the period from June 1, 2019 through May 31, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II. BACKGROUND: Under Contract #77-097-1, the Contractor will provide diagnostic laboratory testing services to CCHP members for the period from June 1, 2019 through May 31, 2021. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, certain specialized health care services for Contra Costa Health Plan members established under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County will not be provided. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C.108 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #77-097-1 with Genomic Health, Inc. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-299-15 with the City of El Cerrito for its Fire Department, a municipal corporation, in an amount not to exceed $333,036, to provide funding for first responder fire paramedic services within the City of El Cerrito and the Kensington Fire Protection District for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by CSA EM-1 (Measure H). (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: County Service Area EM-1 was established in 1989 to provide enhanced emergency medical services, including rapid paramedic-staffed ambulance response, to the residents of Contra Costa County. On May 14, 2013, the Board of Supervisors authorized the County’s Health Services Emergency Medical Services Division approval of CSA EM-1 fire agency funding, based on a population-based funding formula, to partially offset cost to the to fire agencies providing first responder APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 925-313-9554 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.109 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-299-15 with the City of El Cerrito for its Fire Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Paramedic services in Zone. On June 16, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-299-13 (as amended by Contract Amendment/Extension Agreement #23-299-14), with the City of El Cerrito for its Fire Department to provide funding for first responder fire paramedic services within the City of El Cerrito and the Kensington Fire Protection District, for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #23-299-15 will allow the County to continue to provide funding for First Responder Paramedic Program services, through June 30, 2022. This contract includes mutual indemnification to hold both parties harmless for any claims arising out of the performance of the contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will not receive Contractor’s prehospital emergency medical first responder services within the City of El Cerrito. RECOMMENDATION(S): Acting as the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and the Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director and the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District Chief, or designees, to execute Interagency Agreement #23-367-13, in an amount not to exceed $4,601,166 with the Fire Protection District, a public agency, to continue to provide prehospital emergency medical first responder services, for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no County General Fund impact. All payments are funded under County Service Area (CSA) EM-1 (Measure H). (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: County Service Area EM-1 was established in 1989 to provide enhanced emergency medical services, including rapid paramedic-staffed ambulance response, to the residents of Contra Costa County. In May, 2013, the Board of Supervisors adopted the population based allocation formula (CSA-EM1 Zone B fire agencies) to preserve APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 925-313-9554 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.110 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Interagency Agreement #23-367-13 with Contra Costa County Fire Protection District BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) the First Response Funding affected by reductions associated with fire station closures. On June 16, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-367-11 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #23-367-12) with Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, to provide prehospital emergency medical first responder services of its First Responder Paramedic Program, for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2019. Approval of this Interagency Agreement #23-367-13 will allow the Emergency Medical Services Division to continue to provide the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District with funding of its First Responder Paramedic Program, through June 30, 2022. This contract includes mutual indemnification to hold both parties harmless for any claims arising out of the performance of this contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will not receive from Contractor prehospital emergency medical first responder services, within the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, and patient care will not be assumed by County’s emergency ambulance contractor. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-389-12 with the City of Pinole for its Fire Department, a municipal government, in an amount not to exceed $148,311, to provide first responder fire paramedic services by the Pinole Fire Department within the City of Pinole, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% by CSA EM-1 (Measure H). (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: County Service Area EM-1 was established in 1989 to provide enhanced emergency medical services, including rapid paramedic-staffed ambulance response, to the residents of Contra Costa County. On May 18, 2004, the Board of Supervisors authorized the County’s Health Services Emergency Medical Services Division to use CSA EM-1 funding to partially offset cost to the fire agencies of providing first responder Paramedic services in Zone B. On June APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 925-313-9554 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.111 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-389-12 with the City of Pinole for its Fire Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) 16, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-389-10 (as amended by Amendment/Extension Agreement #23-389-11) with the City of Pinole for its Fire Department to provide first responder fire paramedic services by the Pinole Fire Department within the City of Pinole, for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #23-389-12, will allow the Contractor to continue providing the First Responder Paramedic Program services, through June 30, 2022. This contract includes mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, residents of the City of Pinole will not receive first responder fire paramedic services by the City of Pinole Fire Department. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-392-10 with the Rodeo-Hercules Fire Protection District, a public agency, in an amount not to exceed $264,012, to fund first responder fire paramedic services by the Rodeo-Hercules Fire Protection District within the City of Hercules and the unincorporated area of Rodeo, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% by CSA EM-1 (Measure H). (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: County Service Area EM-1 was established in 1989 to provide enhanced emergency medical services, including rapid paramedic-staffed ambulance response, to the residents of Contra Costa County. On May 18, 2004, the Board of Supervisors authorized the County’s Health Services Emergency Medical Services Division to use CSA EM-1 funding to partially offset cost to the fire agencies of providing first responder Paramedic services in Zone B. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 925-313-9554 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.112 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-392-10 with the Rodeo-Hercules Fire Protection District BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On June 16, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-392-8 (as amended by Amendment/Extension Agreement #23-392-9) with Rodeo-Hercules Fire Protection District for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2019, to provide first responder fire paramedic services, for the Rodeo-Hercules Fire Protection District. Approval of Contract #23-392-10 will allow Contractor to continue to provide First Responder Paramedic Program services through June 30, 2022. This contract includes mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will not be able to reimburse Contractor for the cost of prehospital emergency medical first responder services within the Rodeo-Hercules Fire Protection District, until patient care is assumed by County’s emergency ambulance contractor. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute Interagency Agreement #23-549-3 with East Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, a public agency, in an amount not to exceed $678,375, to provide funding for prehospital emergency medical first responder services, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% by County Service Area (CSA) EM-1 (Measure H). (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: County Service Area EM-1 was established in 1989 to provide enhanced emergency medical services, including rapid paramedic-staffed ambulance response, to the residents of Contra Costa County. On May 14, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved Measure H Zone B population-based fire allocations for the East Contra Costa County Fire Protection District to partially subsidize prehospital emergency medical first responder services. On June 16, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Interagency Agreement APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 925-313-9554 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.113 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Interagency Agreement #23-549-3 with East Contra Costa County Fire Protection District BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) #23-549-1, as amended by Amendment/Extension Agreement #23-549-2, with East Contra Costa County Fire Protection District to provide First Responder and Emergency Medical services, for the period July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Interagency Agreement #23-549-3 will allow the Contractor to continue providing Fire First Responder emergency medical services through June 30, 2022. This contract includes mutual indemnification to hold both parties harmless for any claims arising out of the performance of this Agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will not be able to distribute Measure H funds for prehospital emergency medical first responder services, within the East Contra Costa County Fire Protection District, until patient care is assumed by County’s emergency ambulance contractor. RECOMMENDATION(S): Acting as the Board of Supervisors and the Crockett-Carquinez Fire District Board, APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute Interagency Agreement #23-550-3 with Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District, a public agency, in an amount not to exceed $21,189, to provide funding for Fire First Responder Emergency Medical services, for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% by County Service Area (CSA) EM-1 (Measure H). (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: County Service Area EM-1 was established in 1989 to provide enhanced emergency medical services, including rapid paramedic-staffed ambulance response, to the residents of Contra Costa County. On May 14, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved Measure H Zone B population-based fire allocations for the Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District to partially subsidize prehospital emergency medical first responder services. On June 16, 2015, the Board APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 925-313-9554 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.114 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Interagency Agreement #23-550-3 with Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of Supervisors approved Interagency Agreement #23-550-1, as amended by Amendment/Extension Agreement #23-550-2, with Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District to provide First Responder and Emergency Medical services, for the period July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Interagency Agreement #23-550-3 will allow Contractor to continue providing First responder and Emergency services through June 30, 2022, This Contract includes mutual indemnification to hold both parties harmless for any claims arising out of the performance of this Agreement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will not receive prehospital emergency medical first responder services from Contractor, within the Crockett-Carquinez Fire Protection District, and patient care will not be assumed by County’s emergency ambulance contractor. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director or designee, to execute Interagency Agreement #23-551-3 with the City of Richmond on behalf of its Fire Department, in an amount not to exceed $669,066, to provide prehospital emergency medical first responder services, for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% under County Service Area (CSA) EM-1 (Measure H). (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: County Service Area EM-1 was established in 1989 to provide enhanced emergency medical services, including rapid paramedic-staffed ambulance response, to the residents of Contra Costa County. In May, 2013, the Board of Supervisors adopted the population based allocation formula (CSA-EM1 Zone B fire agencies) to preserve the First Response Funding affected by reductions associated with fire station closures. On June 16, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-551-1, as amended by Amendment/Extension Agreement #23-551-2, with the City APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 925-313-9554 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.115 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Interagency Agreement #23-551-3 with City of Richmond on behalf of its Fire Department BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of Richmond on behalf of its Fire Department, to provide funding for Fire First Responder Emergency Medical services, for the period July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2019. Approval of this Interagency Agreement #23-551-3, will allow the County to continue providing funding for First Responder and Emergency Medical services, through June 30, 2022. This contract includes mutual indemnification. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will not receive prehospital emergency medical first responder services, within the Richmond Fire District. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Oakland Private Industry Council, Inc., a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $165,549 to provide administrative and operational support to the East Bay Regional Planning Unit defined by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) for the period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: The contract is funded with 100% Federal WIOA funds. CFDA# 17.258, 17.278 BACKGROUND: Oakland Private Industry Council, Inc. (OPIC) will contract with the Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD), Workforce Development Board (WDB), to provide products and services related to the WIOA. WIOA requires States to identify economic regions within their State, and local areas to coordinate planning and service delivery on a regional basis. The California Workforce Development Board has designed the following local workforce development board jurisdictions as the East Bay Regional Planning Unit (EBRPU): Contra Costa County, Alameda County, and the cities of Oakland and Richmond. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-4963 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.116 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Oakland Private Industry Council, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) To meet the requirements of the WIOA legislation, and in an effort to benefit from economies of scale and to leverage resources, the four jurisdictions work cooperatively in grant acquisition, service design, contracting, and purchasing, and jointly use the services of the contractor to carry out responsibilities on behalf of the EBRPU under the EASTBAY Works (EBW) umbrella. Contractor will employ, supervise and provide employer of record services for an EBW Regional Coordinator/Organizer and any other staff the WDBCCC deems necessary, who will provide direct coordination and system building services to EBRPU/EBW; provide contracting and payment for staff travel, communications, supplies, phone, and resource development as determined necessary by the WDBCCC; maintain EBW Job Seeker 800 phone number and enter into any related Contracts to do so; provide and maintain technology support for EBW website and enter into any related Contracts to do so; and provide administrative and operational support to EBRPU/EBW. Costs are split between the four (4) Regional Planning Unit members. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: EHSD's Workforce Development Board will not meet the requirements of the WIOA legislation, nor will they benefit from economies of scale and resource leveraging to carry out responsibilities on behalf of the EBRPU. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract supports all five of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; 3) "Families that are Economically Self Sufficient"; 4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and 5) "Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families" by providing administrative support to efforts that train and provide employment opportunities for job seekers. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #25-071-6 with Public Health Foundation Enterprise, a non-profit corporation, effective May 1, 2019, to amend Contract #25-071-5, to increase the payment limit by $1,042,539, from $5,013,000 to a new payment limit of $6,055,539, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract Amendment Agreement is funded by 31% Federal Funds, 48% State Funds, 11% City Grant Funds, 3% Employment and Human Services Department Funds, 2% Private Grant Funds and 5% General Funds. BACKGROUND: On July 24, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #25-071-5 with Public Health Foundation Enterprise for the provision of shelter, transitional and permanent supportive housing program for homeless youth and adults in Contra Costa County, for the period from APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lavonna Martin, 925-608-6701 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.117 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #25-071-6 with Public Health Foundation Enterprise BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. At the time of negotiations, the payment limit was based on target levels of utilization. However, the utilization during the term of the agreement was higher than originally anticipated. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #25-071-6 will allow the Contractor to provide additional emergency shelter and respite services to homeless youth and adult clients through June 30, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, County’s homeless clients will experience longer wait times for shelter and respite services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #74-571-1 with Psynergy Programs, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $179,242 to provide residential and mental health services to adults diagnosed with Serious Mental Illness (SMI) and Serious Persistent Mental Illness (SPMI) for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded by 56% Federal Medi-Cal and 44% Mental Health Services Act. BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing residential facilities for adults who require support and are being discharged from state hospitals or psychiatric health facilities and require step-down care to transition to community living. On September 25, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-571 with Psynergy Programs, Inc. for the provision of residential and mental health services to adults diagnosed with SMI and SPMI being stepped down from Institutes for Mental Diseases (IMD) levels of care and transition back into the community, for the period from September 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Matthew White, M.D., 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.118 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #74-571-1 with Psynergy Programs, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract #74-571-1, will allow the Contractor to continue to provide residential and mental health services through June 30, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County clients in need of crisis residential or step-down care will not have access to Contractor’s services possibly resulting in higher levels of placement, including hospitalization. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #24-680-36 with Telecare Corporation, a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,815,818, to provide gero-psychiatric and subacute mental health care services to severely and persistently mentally ill (SPMI) clients, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded by 75% Mental Health Realignment, 20% Hospital Enterprise Fund I and 5% County General Fund. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing gero-psychiatric services and subacute care for SPMI County residents at Contractor’s Villa Fairmont Mental Health Center, Garfield Neuro-Behavioral Center, Gladman Psychiatric Health Facility, and Morton Bakar Center. This Contract is part of the Department’s cost saving plan to reduce the number of high cost State Hospital beds by developing alternative placements. On May 8, 2018, the Board of Supervisors APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Matthew White, M.D., 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.119 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #24-680-36 with Telecare Corporation BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) approved Contract #24-680-34, as amended by Contract Amendment Agreement #24-680-35, with Telecare Corporation for the provision of gero-psychiatric and subacute mental health care for Severely and Persistently Mentallly Ill clients for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #24-680-36 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide gero-psychiatric and subacute mental health care services through June 30, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County’s SPMI adults will not have access to Contractor’s gero-psychiatric and subacute care services resulting in placements in State Hospital facilities at greater cost to the County. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #24-794-8(22) with John Muir Behavioral Health, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $3,020,781, to provide inpatient psychiatric hospital services for children, adolescents and adults, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Mental Health Realignment Funds. (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: Assembly Bill (AB) 757, (Chapter 633, Statutes of 1994), authorized the transfer of state funding for Fee-For-Service/Medi-Cal acute psychiatric inpatient hospital services from the Department of Health Services to the Department of Health Care Services. On January 1, 1995, the Department of Mental Health transferred these funds and the responsibility for authorization and funding of Medi-Cal acute psychiatric inpatient hospital services to counties that chose to participate in this program. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Matthew White, M.D., 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.120 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #24–794–8(22) with John Muir Behavioral Health BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On May 8, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #24–794–8(18), as amended by Administrative Amendment #24–794–8(19) and Amendment Agreement #24–794–8(21), with John Muir Behavioral Health for the provision of inpatient psychiatric hospital services to County-referred children, adolescents and adults for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #24–794–8(22) will allow the Contractor to continue to provide services through June 30, 2020. This contract includes mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this Contract. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County’s mental health clients will not receive needed inpatient psychiatric services from Contractor’s facility. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #74–331-11 with Helios Healthcare, LLC, a limited liability company, in an amount not to exceed $473,840, to provide sub-acute skilled nursing care services for serious mentally ill and neurobehavioral clients, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Mental Health Realignment Fund. (Rate Increase) BACKGROUND: On May 10, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-331-10 with Helios Healthcare, LLC, to provide sub-acute skilled nursing care services for serious mentally ill and neurobehavioral clients, for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #74-331-11 will allow the Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2020. This contract includes mutual indemnification to hold harmless both parties for any claims arising out of the performance of this Contract. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Matthew White, M.D., 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.121 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #74–331-11 with Helios Healthcare, LLC CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, there will be fewer sub-acute skilled nursing care services available for County’s seriously mentally ill and neurobehavioral clients. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #74-524-4 with Kermit Johnson, M.D., an individual, in an amount not to exceed $279,552, to provide outpatient psychiatric services for mentally ill adults in Central County for the period from August 1, 2019 through July 31, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Mental Health Realignment funds. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On July 10, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-524-3 with Kermit Johnson, M.D. for the provision of outpatient psychiatric services, including diagnosing, counseling, evaluating, providing medical and therapeutic treatment for mentally ill adults in Central County for the period from August 1, 2018 through July 31, 2019. Approval APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Matthew White, M.D., 925-370-5891 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.122 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #74-524-4 with Kermit Johnson, M.D. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of Contract #74-524-4 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide outpatient psychiatric services to patients in Central County through July 31, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring outpatient psychiatric services will not have access to Contractor’s services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Extension Agreement #74-550-2 with Healthright 360, a non-profit corporation, to amend Contract #74-550-1 , to extend the termination date from August 15, 2020 to August 15, 2021 with no change in the payment limit of $5,300,550 for the provision of pre-arrest, at-arrest and post-arrest diversion opportunities and coordination services for Antioch residents with behavioral health issues. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded by 89% California Board of State and Community Corrections Grant; and 11% Probation Department Grant. BACKGROUND: The CoCo Lead+ Project is a County program funded by the California Board of State and Community Corrections, Proposition APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Matthew White, M.D., 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker C.123 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Extension Agreement #74-550-2 with Healthright 360 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) 47, “The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act”, to ensure services for adults with behavioral issues who are committing non-serious, non-violent crimes are available through prevention, diversion and support programs. Contractor is the primary subcontractor who holds administrative responsibility for all aspects of community-based activities, develop policies and protocols with all partners regarding diversion and project services, hire and train staff, facilitate coordination to reduce both barriers and gaps, develop data system and protocols to support evaluation, develop and implement a communications plan, and partner with County’s Health Services Department and the County Administrator’s Office to subcontract funds in amounts and for purposes identified. On November 14, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-550, as amended by Amendment Agreement #74-550-1, with Healthright 360 for the provision of pre-arrest, at-arrest and post-arrest diversion opportunities and coordination services for Antioch residents with behavioral health issues for the period from November 1, 2017 through August 15, 2020. Approval of Contract Extension Agreement #74-550-2 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide pre-arrest, at-arrest and post-arrest diversion opportunities and coordination services through August 15, 2021. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, Contractor will not be paid for additional services provided to expand the program. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Extension Agreement #74-553-1 with the City of Antioch, a public agency, to amend Contract #74-553 , to extend the termination date from August 15, 2020 to August 15, 2021, with no change in the payment limit of $167,481 to provide a diversion police officer for pre-arrest, at-arrest and post-arrest diversion opportunities for Antioch residents for the Contra Costa Lead Plus (CoCo Lead+) Project. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by California Board of State and Community Corrections Grant. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: The CoCo Lead+ Project is a County program funded by the California Board of State and Community Corrections, (Proposition 47 or the “The Safe Neighborhoods and Schools Act”) to ensure prevention, diversion and support program services are available for adults with behavioral issues who are committing non-serious, non-violent crimes. On December 12, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-553 with APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Matthew White, M.D., 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.124 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Extension Agreement #74-553-1 with City of Antioch BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) the City of Antioch to provide a diversion police officer for pre-arrest, at-arrest and post-arrest diversion opportunities for Antioch residents for the CoCo Lead+ Project for the period from November 1, 2017 through August 15, 2020. Approval of Contract Extension Agreement #74-553-1 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide pre-arrest, at-arrest and post-arrest diversion opportunities and coordination services through August 15, 2021. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, Contractor will not be paid for additional services provided to expand the program. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Seneca Family of Agencies, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $624,000 to provide Wraparound Program services Countywide to increase placement stability of children, for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will increase budgeted expenditures by $624,000, funded 30% with County General Fund revenues and 70% with State Realignment revenues. BACKGROUND: Seneca Family of Agencies (Contractor) was selected through the competitive bid process, Request For Proposal (RFP) 1162. Contractor will provide Wraparound Services, a community-based intervention program that provides children with service alternatives to group home care through expanded family-based services. Wraparound Services will be provided to children living with their birth parent, relative, adoptive parent, foster parent or guardian. These services build on the strengths of each child and family and are tailored to address their unique and changing needs. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 8-4961 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.125 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Seneca Family of Agencies for Wraparound Program Services to Increase Stability of Children CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: At-risk youth in restrictive group home settings will have fewer opportunities to transition into family-based services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract supports four of the five community outcomes established in the Children’s Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; 3) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and, 4) "Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families" by placing at risk youth into family-based or less restrictive service settings. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-391-16 with Laura Swafford, an individual, in an amount not to exceed $250,000, to provide technical support and training services for the Health Services Department for the ccLink System, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 26, 2018 the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-391-15 with Laura Swafford, to provide technical support and training services to the Health Services Department’s billing office work processes and creating work queues in ccLink for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #23-391-16 will allow Contractor to continue to provide technical support and training services through June 30, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 925-957-5405 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C.126 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-391-16 with Laura Swafford CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the Contractor will not provide services to the Department for work queues and billing in ccLink System. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Community Violence Solutions, in an amount not to exceed $182,039 to provide Child Welfare Redesign Differential Response Path 2 Case Management services in West Contra Costa County for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract will increase expenditures by $182,039.00 funded 100% by State Child Welfare Services Outcome Improvement Project-Realignment funds. BACKGROUND: This Contractor was selected as a result of the competitive bid process to continue implementation of the Differential Response Path 2 Case Management Program, which provides early intervention in the lives of families who have had a report of abuse or neglect. The Differential Response Program works with community-based and/or faith-based organizations to provide case management and home visiting services to high-risk families to address the issues that brought the family to the attention of Children and Family Services (CFS). Selected contractors provide services to impact the family's ability to safely care for their children and avoid the further need for interaction with and further investigation by CFS. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 8-4961 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.127 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Community Violence Solutions for Differential Response Program Case Management Services CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Employment and Human Services will be unable to provide valuable case management services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The services provided under this contract support all five of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes: (1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; (2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; (3)"Families that are Economically Self-Sufficient"; (4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and (5)"Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families” by providing community-based services to families to deter continued CFS intervention. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Novation Contract #22-219-63 with Elior, Inc. (dba Bateman Community Living, LLC), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $3,171,323, to provide meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. This Contract includes a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2020, in an amount not to exceed $792,831. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is 100% federally funded, under Title III C-1 and Title III C-2 of the Federal Older Americans Act of 1965. No County funds are required. (Rate Increase) BACKGROUND: This Contractor was selected to provide meals for the Senior Nutrition Program through a competitive bid process conducted by the County’s General Services Department (Purchasing). This Contract meets the social needs of the County’s population. Contractor will provide prepackaged, frozen meals, on 249 County-designated serving days, for elderly, disabled, and AIDS/HIV APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.128 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #22–219–63 with Elior, Inc. (dba Bateman Community Living, LLC) BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) diagnosed citizens of Contra Costa County. On August 14, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #22–219–61, as amended by Amendment Agreement #22–219–62, with Elior, Inc. (dba Bateman Community Living, LLC), for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, with a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2019, for the provision of meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program. Approval of Novation Contract #22-219-63 replaces the automatic extension under the prior contact and will allow the Contractor to continue providing meal services through June 30, 2020. This Contract includes modifications to County’s standard indemnification clause. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the elderly, disabled, and AIDS/HIV diagnosed citizens of Contra Costa County participating in the Senior Nutrition Program may not receive the appropriate meals or nutrition. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Contra Costa County Office of Education in an amount not to exceed $750,000 to provide Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) year-round youth workforce development services in East and West County for the period July 1, 2019 through September 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This interagency agreement will increase department expenditures by $750,000 to be funded 100% with Federal WIOA revenue. BACKGROUND: This contract was awarded through Request for Proposal 1150 for the provision of comprehensive WIOA youth development services to eligible youth ages 16-24 in Contra Costa County. Funding for this contract will come from WIOA formula youth funds. WIOA defines the nation’s job training system and provides guidance for local workforce investment systems designed to increase the employment, retention, and earnings of participants, and to increase occupational skill attainment by participants. The goals of these efforts are to improve the quality APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 8-4961 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.129 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Contra Costa County Office of Education for Workforce Development Services for Youth BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of the workforce, reduce welfare dependency, and enhance the productivity and competitiveness of the nation’s workforce. Contractor will provide a systematic approach that offers eligible in-school and out-of-school youth a broad range of coordinated services. This includes assistance in academic and occupational learning, development of leadership skills, and preparation for further education, additional training, and eventual employment. Programs will provide guidance for youth that is balanced with appropriate consideration of each youth’s involvement in his or her training and educational plan. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without this contract, in-school and out-of-school youth in Contra Costa County will not receive assistance in overcoming barriers to employment, job readiness, educational programs, and career building. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The services provided under this contract support all five of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes: (1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; (2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; (3)"Families that are Economically Self-Sufficient"; (4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and (5)"Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families” by providing training and employment opportunities for in-school and out-of-school youth. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of County Contract #27-169-16 with Lifelong Medical Care, a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $3,000,000, to provide primary care, urgent care and specialty medical services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On July 24, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-169-15 with Lifelong Medical Care for the provision of primary care, urgent care and specialty medical services to CCHP members, for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #27-169-16 will allow Contractor to provide primary care, urgent care and specialty medical services through June 30, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd , Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.130 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #27-169-16 with Lifelong Medical Care CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, certain specialized health care services for CCHP members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County will not be provided. RECOMMENDATION(S): (1) APPROVE plans, specifications, and design for the 2019 Asphalt Rubber Cape Seal and Micro-Surface Seal Project, Lafayette, Martinez, San Pablo areas. (County Project No. 0672-6U2184-18 and 0672-6U2183) (District I & V) (2) DETERMINE that Pavement Coatings Co. (“Pavement Coatings”) the lowest monetary bidder, has complied with the requirements of the County’s Outreach Program and has exceeded the Mandatory Subcontracting Minimum for this project, as provided in the project specifications; and FURTHER DETERMINE that Pavement Coatings has submitted the lowest responsive and responsible bid for the project. (3) AWARD the construction contract for the above project to Pavement Coatings in the listed amount ($3,403,582.00) and the unit prices submitted in the bid, and DIRECT that Pavement Coatings shall present two good and sufficient surety bonds, as indicated below, and that the Public Works Director, or designee, shall prepare the contract. (4) ORDER that, after the contractor has signed the contract and returned it, together with the bonds as noted below and any required certificates of insurance or other required documents, and the Public Works Director has reviewed and found them to be sufficient, the Public Works Director, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Kevin Emigh 925-313-2233 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.131 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Construction Contract for the 2019 Asphalt Rubber Cape Seal and Micro-Surface Seal Project, Lafayette, Martinez, and San Pablo areas. RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) or designee, is authorized to sign the contract for this Board. (5) ORDER that, in accordance with the project specifications and/or upon signature of the contract by the Public Works Director, or designee, bid bonds posted by the bidders are to be exonerated and any checks or cash submitted for security shall be returned. (6) ORDER that, the Public Works Director, or designee, is authorized to sign any escrow agreements prepared for this project to permit the direct payment of retentions into escrow or the substitution of securities for moneys withheld by the County to ensure performance under the contract, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22300. (7) DELEGATE, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 4114, to the Public Works Director, or designee, the Board’s functions under Public Contract Code Sections 4107 and 4110. (8) DELEGATE, pursuant to Labor Code Section 6705, to the Public Works Director, or to any registered civil or structural engineer employed by the County, the authority to accept detailed plans showing the design of shoring, bracing, sloping, or other provisions to be made for worker protection during trench excavation covered by that section. (9) DECLARE that, should the award of the contract to Pavement Coatings be invalidated for any reason, the Board would not in any event have awarded the contract to any other bidder, but instead would have exercised its discretion to reject all of the bids received. Nothing in this Board Order shall prevent the Board from re-awarding the contract to another bidder in cases where the successful bidder establishes a mistake, refuses to sign the contract, or fails to furnish required bonds or insurance (see Public Contract Code Sections 5100-5107). FISCAL IMPACT: The Project will be funded by 10.3% CalRecycle Grant Funds and 89.7% Local Road Funds. BACKGROUND: The above project was previously approved by the Board of Supervisors, plans and specifications were filed with the Board, and bids were invited by the Public Works Director. On May 7, 2019 the Public Works Department received bids from the following contractors: BIDDER, TOTAL AMOUNT, BOND AMOUNTS Pavement Coatings, Inc.: $3,403,582.00; Payment: $3,403,582.00; Performance: $3,403,582.00 American Pavement Systems, Inc.: $3,482,096.05 The Public Works Director has reported that Pavement Coatings documented an adequate good faith effort to comply with the requirements of the County’s Outreach Program and exceeded the Mandatory Subcontracting Minimum, and the Public Works Director recommends that the construction contract be awarded to Pavement Coatings. The Public Works Director recommends that the bid submitted by Pavement Coatings is the lowest responsive and responsible bid, which is $78,514.05 less than the next lowest bid, and this Board concurs and so finds. The Board of Supervisors previously determined that the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 1(c) Categorical Exemption, and a Notice of Exemption was filed with the County Clerk on March 26, 2019. The general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project, have been filed with the Clerk of the Board, and copies will be made available to any party upon request. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Construction of the project would be delayed, and the project might not be built. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE Auditor-Controller, or designee, to issue payment in an amount not to exceed $385,191 to MGA Healthcare, Inc. for temporary medical staffing services rendered to the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers from December 1, 2018 through May 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funded by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: On August 7, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #76-585-1 with MGA Healthcare, Inc., for the provision of temporary medical staffing services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers including temporary radiology technicians, pharmacists, laboratory, respiratory, pharmacy technicians and permanent placement recruitment services, for the period May 1, 2018 through November 30, 2018. Due to an administrative oversight, the meet and confer process did not take place. The Department and Unions are currently meeting over the services beginning June 1, 2019. The purpose of this Board Order is to pay for services between December 1, 2018 and May 31, 2019. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.132 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Payment to MGA Healthcare, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The provider is entitled to payment for the reasonable value of their services under the equitable relief theory of quantum meruit. That theory provides that where a person has been asked to provide services without a valid contract, and the provider does so to the benefit of the recipient, the provider is entitled to recover the reasonable value of those services. As such, the Department recommends that the Board authorize the Auditor-Controller to issue a one-time payment to MGA Healthcare, Inc., in the amount of $385,191 for services provided from December 1, 2018 through May 31, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers will not be able to provide necessary medical services to patients and the Contractor will not be paid for services rendered. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, an amendment to purchase order #013417 with Tiernan-Leino Dental Laboratory, to extend the term from August 31, 2019 through August 31, 2020 with no change in the original payment limit of $240,000 for the purchase of dental supplies and prosthetics for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC), Contra Costa Health Centers, as well as the Martinez and West County Detention Facilities. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I budget. BACKGROUND: The CCRMC, Contra Costa Health Centers, Martinez and West County Detention Facilities purchase large quantities of dental supplies and prosthetics from this vendor. This vendor’s products are required to provide dental care for those incarcerated there. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Purchase Order amendment is not approved, these facilities may not be able to provide full dental service to its patients. Dental service for incarcerated individuals is mandated by law. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Margaret Harris C.133 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order amendment with Tiernan-Leino Dental Laboratory RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Goodwill Industries of the Greater East Bay, Inc., a non-profit corporation of California, to extend the term from June 30, 2019 to December 31, 2019, for continued Subsidized Temporary Experience with/without Pay for the Under-Employed Program (STEP-UP) Services. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no change to the contract's payment limit of $1,037,125 to be funded from California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs), which is designated 15% State revenue and 85% Federal revenue. BACKGROUND: Goodwill Industries of the Greater East Bay, Inc. (Goodwill) was selected from a competitive procurement, Request for Proposal 1161 to provide STEP-UP Services County-wide. STEP-UP is designed to provide entry-level work experience to designated CalWORKs Welfare-to-Work (WTW) participants who are not meeting their WTW participation requirements, by immediately placing them into Work Experience (WEX) assignments for up to 180 days. The goal of STEP-UP, when coupled APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 8-4961 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.134 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Amend Contract with Goodwill Industries of the Greater East Bay, Inc. for Subsidized Temporary Experience for the Under-Employed Program (STEP-UP) Ser BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) with other necessary WTW activities and services, is to immediately engage participants by providing exposure to work and basic job skills and ultimately leading to a participant’s successful, long-term job placement. Under this Contract, Goodwill develops, implements, and monitors countywide paid and unpaid WEX opportunities. Provisions of this Contract include two components: Acting as the Employer of Record and Job Development/Placement for both paid and unpaid WEX assignments. This extension will extend necessary services to CalWORKs/WTW clients and allow assessment for possible program adjustments to improve outcomes. The current budget is sufficient for the extended term. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Contra Costa County will not be able to provide the federally mandated STEP-UP Program of CalWORKs. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an interagency agreement with Chabot-Las Positas Community College District (CLPCCD) in an amount not to exceed $550,000 to deliver education and training services to foster care providers and Children and Family Services staff for the period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: The interagency agreement is funded 100% by State 2011 State Realignment revenue. BACKGROUND: CLPCCD has a successful history in providing an array of training and technical assistance to child welfare agencies and community partners as evidenced by partnerships with Alameda, Mendocino and Solano Counties. CLPCCD provides training to increase the skills and capacity of those who work directly with foster and adoptive children. Courses range from trauma informed care to topics such as Resource Family Pre-Approval training, Safety Organized Practice, professional development and new laws and initiatives impacting child welfare. This is an effort to expand expertise and knowledge of those individuals providing care and services to Contra Costa County children and youth placed in foster care. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-4963 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.135 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Chabot-Las Positas Community College District for Services to Foster Care Providers CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Valuable education and training services will not be provided to those who work directly with foster and adoptive children. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This agency agreement supports all five of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; 3) "Families that are Economically Self Sufficient"; 4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and 5) "Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families" by providing training to foster care providers. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Novation Contract #72-075-4 with J-Sei, Inc., a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $30,713, including changes to the County Standard Indemnification clause, to provide home-delivered meals to elderly residents in West Contra Costa County for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020, which includes a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2020, in an amount not to exceed $7,678. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% Title III-C 2 of the Older Americans Act of funds. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of a small ethnic Japanese community that exists along the West Contra Costa County and Alameda County border, by providing ethnically appropriate home-delivered meals on 250 serving days, for up to 15 nutritionally at-risk, homebound senior citizens, to ensure they receive at least one third of their daily nutritional requirements. In June 2018, the County Administrator APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dan Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: F Carroll, M Wilhelm C.136 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Novation Contract #72-075-4 with J-Sei, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) approved and the Purchasing Services Manager executed Contract #72-075-3 with J-Sei, Inc. for the provision of home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program, for the period July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, which included a three month automation extension period through September 30, 2019 for the provision of home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program. Approval of this Novation Contract #72-075-4 replaces the automatic extension under the prior contract allowing the Contractor to continue to provide home-delivered meals for the Senior Nutrition Program through June 30, 2020. This Contract includes modifications to County’s Standard Indemnification clauses. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, West County’s small ethnic Japanese community of homebound senior citizens will not receive meals which provide at least one third of their daily nutrition. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Lilliput Children’s Services, a Non-Profit Corporation, in an amount not to exceed $444,562 to provide family finding services for foster youth for the period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: The funds allocated for this contract are 100% State 2011 Realignment. BACKGROUND: Family Finding is an intensive research and engagement process for the youth involved in Children and Family Services (CFS). The purpose of the Family Finding program is to offer lifelong connections to foster youth by locating the most appropriate stable family or non-related extended family members, supporting the resource family approval process, providing a placement, or discovering relatives of the children in care. Lilliput Children’s Services (Contractor) was selected from a competitive bid process in Fiscal 2018-2019 and this contract supports renewal for Fiscal 2019-2020. The Contractor works closely with CFS staff APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-4963 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.137 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Lilliput Children's Services for Child Welfare Family Finding Services for Foster Youth BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) to deliver Family Finding services to ensure Contra Costa County foster youth reside in a safe and nurturing environment. Services provided by the Contractor include the following: Psychosocial Assessments in compliance with the California Department of Social Services, Resource Family Approval (RFA) program; communicating general progress in completing assessments with County staff; Out-of-County RFA-pre approvals of potential caregivers, as needed; participating in Child Family Team meetings as needed or requested; gathering statistical data for measuring progress on performance outcomes and goals; and establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with County staff, kin and non kin-caregivers, and community members. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Contra Costa County foster youth will have less access to family finding and supportive services to locate and transition into appropriate stable permanent placements. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract supports four of the five community outcomes established in the Children’s Report Card: 1) Children Ready for and Succeeding in School; 2) Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood; 3) Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing; and 4) Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families by placing foster youth into appropriate, stable and permanent placements. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #74-143-30 with California Psychiatric Transitions Incorporated, a corporation, effective June 1, 2019, to amend Contract #74-143-29, to increase the payment limit by $504,956, from $1,322,000 to new payment limit of $1,826,956, with no change in the original term of September 1, 2018 through August 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This amendment is funded 80% Mental Health Realignment; 20% Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On July 10, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-143-29 with California Psychiatric Transitions Incorporated for the provision of residential care and mental health services to severely emotionally disturbed adults, for the period from September 1, 2018 through August 31, 2019. Approval APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Matthew White, M.D., 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.138 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #74-143-30 with California Psychiatric Transitions Incorporated BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of Contract Amendment Agreement #74-143-30 will allow the Contractor to provide additional services through August 31, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, County’s seriously mentally ill clients will not receive the inpatient psychiatric treatment that they need from this Contractor and may require hospitalization at a State Hospital. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Lilliput Children’s Services, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $431,051 to provide Kinship Support Services to relative caregivers of relative’s children for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% by State 2011 Realignment funds. BACKGROUND: Lilliput Children’s Services was selected from a competitive procurement, Request for Proposal #1159 in 2018, to provide the Kinship Support Services Program for East Contra Costa County. The Kinship Program provides community-based family support services to relative caregivers and the dependent children placed in their homes by the juvenile court as well as for those who are at risk of dependency or delinquency. Additionally, these programs will provide post-permanency services to relative caregivers who have become the legal guardian or adoptive parent of formerly dependent children. Lilliput Children’s Services will provide multiple support services for relative and non-relative caregivers including site based mentoring, case management, support groups, recreational/group activities, respite, emergency assistance and educational forums. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-4963 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.139 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Lilliput Children's Services for Kinship Support Services to Relative Caregivers of Relative's Children CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: These services are necessary to support relative caregivers in successfully raising their kin and preventing the removal of children from an extended family when the biological parents are unable to provide care. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract supports all five of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; 3) "Families that are Economically Self Sufficient"; 4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and 5) "Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families" by providing family support, stability, and safety of children, thereby preventing out-of-home placement. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-591-3 with Archer Business Solutions, LLC, a limited liability company, in an amount not to exceed $145,000, to provide technical support and consulting services for the Health Services Department’s Information Systems Unit, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On May 1, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-591-2 with Archer Business Solutions, LLC, for the provision of technical support, consulting, training and project management for the Department’s Information Systems Unit, with regard to the implementation of PeopleSoft data analytics and reporting system for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #23-591-3 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide technical support and consulting through June 30, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 925-957-5405 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C.140 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-591-3 with Archer Business Solutions, LLC CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County will not have access to Contractor’s expert technical assistance, support and optimization skills to the Information Systems Unit. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #27-589-12 with Night Owl Pediatrics (dba Night Owl Urgent Care), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000, to provide urgent care and pediatric primary care services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On July 11, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-589-10 (as amended by Amendment Agreement #27-589-11) with Night Owl Pediatrics, Inc., for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019, for the provision of pediatric primary care and urgent care services to CCHP members. Approval of Contract #27-589-12 will allow Contractor to continue providing pediatric primary care and urgent care services through June 30, 2021 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron Mackey, 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.141 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #27-589-12 with Night Owl Pediatrics (dba Night Owl Urgent Care) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, certain specialized professional health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contracts with the County will not be provided. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an interagency agreement with Contra Costa Community College District - Diablo Valley College (DVC) Campus in an amount not to exceed $32,400 to provide Heritage training for the period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: The interagency agreement is funded with 75% Federal ($24,300), 17.5% State ($5,670), and 7.5% General Fund ($2,430) funding. (CFDA #93.658) BACKGROUND: In response to the increasing magnitude of problems related to perinatal exposure to alcohol and other drugs, an interagency collaboration was formed that involved the California Departments of Alcohol and Drug Programs, Health Services, and Social Services. This collaboration was named Options for Recovery (OFR), now known as the “Heritage” Project. The mission was to promote the recovery of pregnant, postpartum, and parenting chemically dependent women and the enhancement of the health of their children by providing comprehensive and coordinated alcohol and other drug treatment, case management, and specialized recruitment and training of foster parents and relative caregivers. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-4963 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.142 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Contra Costa Community College District - Diablo Valley College Campus for Resource Family Heritage Training BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The Heritage Project in Contra Costa County is a program designed to train caregivers of the needs of babies and children who are born exposed to drugs and/or alcohol, which may also be HIV exposed, are court dependents and are under six (6) years of age. The Heritage Project training for foster caregivers entails thirty-three (33) hours of classroom training in the areas of Childhood HIV and AIDS, Comforting the Drug Exposed Infant and Special Medical Needs and the Effects of Drugs and Alcohol on Infants. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Heritage training is not delivered to foster caregivers, there will be less available specially trained families who will be able to care for babies and children who are born exposed to drugs and/or alcohol, who may also be HIV exposed. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract supports all five of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; 3) "Families that are Economically Self Sufficient"; 4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and 5) "Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families" by preparing caregivers to better meet the specialized needs of vulnerable children in the foster care system and allows transition to family reunification. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an interagency agreement with Contra Costa Community College District – Diablo Valley College (DVC) Campus in an amount not to exceed $30,000 to provide Resource Family Pre-Approval training for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: The interagency agreement is funded with 75% Federal ($22,500) and 25% State ($7,500) funding and are included in the FY2019/20 department budget. (CFDA #93.658) BACKGROUND: Resource Family Approval (RFA) was enacted by legislation in 2007 and expanded through Senate Bill 1013 (Chapter 35, Statutes of 2012). The statute requires the California Department of Social Services (CDSS), in consultation with county child welfare agencies, including Juvenile Probation, foster parent associations and other interested community parties to implement a unified, family friendly and child-centered resource family approval process. The RFA program has a single approval standard that replaces the existing multiple processes for licensing APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-4963 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.143 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Interagency Agreement with Contra Costa Community College District - Diablo Valley College Campus for Resource Family Pre-Approval Training BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) foster family homes, approving relatives and non-relative extended family members ("NREFMs") as foster care providers, and approving families for legal guardianship or adoption. In compliance with State mandates, Contra Costa Community College District - Diablo Valley College will provide caregivers of foster children six (6), twelve to eighteen (12-18) hour training sessions. The required pre-approval training will provide guidance and instruction to potential resource (foster) families to better prepare and meet the needs of vulnerable children, youth and non-minor dependents in the county child welfare system. The contractor will locate and hire independent training consultants, and provide appropriate instructional materials to each training participant. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: State law requires that all currently licensed foster family homes, approved relative caregivers, or NREFMs must convert to the Resource Family Approval Program no later than December 31, 2020. If the caregiver does not obtain resource family approval by December 31, 2020, all licenses and prior approvals shall forfeit on that date. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This agreement supports all five of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) Children Ready for and Succeeding in School; 2) Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood; 3) Families that are Economically Self Sufficient; 4) Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing; and 5) Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families, by preparing families to better meet the needs of vulnerable children in the foster care system and allows seamless transition to permanency. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #77-094-1 with Sharon de Edwards, M.D., FACOG, a sole proprietor, in an amount not to exceed $500,000, to provide obstetrics and gynecology services for Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by CCHP Enterprise Fund II. BACKGROUND: On July 18, 2017, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #77-094 with Sharon de Edwards, M.D., FACOG, for the provision of obstetrics and gynecology services for CCHP members for the period from July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Contract #77-094-1, the Contractor will provide obstetrics and gynecology services through June 30, 2021. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, CCHP members will not receive the benefits of obstetrics and gynecology services from the Contractor. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharron Mackey 925-313-6104 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, Marcy Wilhelm C.144 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #77-094-1 with Sharon de Edwards, M.D., FACOG RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an agreement with Contra Costa County Office of Education in an amount not to exceed $108,045 to provide educational liaison services for children in foster care for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement will increase department expenditures by $108,045, to be funded 70% by 2011 Realignment and 30% by County General funds. BACKGROUND: Education Liaisons at Contra Costa County Office of Education work collaboratively with local school districts, child welfare agencies, foster care agencies, probation, post-secondary institutions, caregivers, and community organizations with the goal of improving the educational gap for foster youth. Using a unique partnership, Education Liaisons work closely with Children and Family Services (CFS) social workers to help support the educational needs of children by ensuring proper educational placement, school enrollment, and checkout from school as well as assisting with the transfer of grades, credits, and records when there is a school change as mandated by California Education Code § 48853.5(b)-(d), (e)(8)(C). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 8-4961 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.145 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Contra Costa County Office of Education for Educational Liaison Services for Foster Youth CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without educational liaisons, foster children and youth will experience increased barriers in accessing the same academic resources, services, and extracurricular and enrichment activities that are available to all students. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract supports four of the five community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; 3) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and 4) "Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families" by supporting the educational rights of children and youth in foster care. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a Purchase Order with Medline Industries Inc., in an amount not to exceed $33,000,000 for medical supplies, cleaning supplies, disaster supplies, and miscellaneous equipment for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers, for the period from June 27, 2019 through June 26, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I budget. BACKGROUND: Medline Industries, Inc. is the primary distributor for medical and non-medical supplies and products for the CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers. Purchasing from them enables the Health Services Department to take advantage of their status as a Vizient vendor, thus enabling the Department to collect annual rebates. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Purchase Order is not approved, then the CCRMC and the Contra Costa Health Centers will be unable to procure sufficient supplies, which could possibly impact patient care. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Japreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Margaret Harris C.146 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Medline Industries, Inc. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute an interagency agreement with Contra Costa Community College District - Contra Costa College (CCC) Campus in an amount not to exceed $30,400 to provide Heritage training for the period of July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: The interagency agreement is funded with 75% Federal ($22,800), 17.5% State ($5,320), and 7.5% General Fund ($2,280) funding. (CFDA #93.658) BACKGROUND: In response to the increasing magnitude of problems related to perinatal exposure to alcohol and other drugs, an interagency collaboration was formed that involved the California Departments of Alcohol and Drug Programs, Health Services, and Social Services. This collaboration was previously named Options for Recovery, and is now known as the “Heritage” Project. The mission was to promote the recovery of pregnant, postpartum, and parenting chemically dependent women and enhance the health of their children, by providing comprehensive and coordinated alcohol and other drug treatment, case management, and specialized recruitment and training of foster parents and relative caregivers. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-4963 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.147 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Interagency Agreement with Contra Costa Community College District - Contra Costa College Campus for Resource Family Heritage Training BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The Heritage Project in Contra Costa County is a program designed to train caregivers of the needs of babies and children who are born exposed to drugs and/or alcohol, including HIV exposure, are court dependents and are under six (6) years of age. Heritage training for foster caregivers entails thirty-three (33) hours of classroom training in the areas of Childhood HIV and AIDS, Comforting the Drug Exposed Infant and Special Medical Needs and the Effects of Drugs and Alcohol on Infants. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Heritage training is not delivered to foster caregivers, there will be less available specially trained families who will be able to care for babies and children who are born exposed to drugs and/or alcohol, who may also be HIV exposed. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This agreement supports all five of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; 3) "Families that are Economically Self Sufficient"; 4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and 5) "Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families" by preparing caregivers to better meet the specialized needs of vulnerable children in the foster care system and allows transition to family reunification. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, an amendment to purchase order #F03368 with Depuy Synthes Products, Inc., to increase the payment limit by $700,000 to a new payment limit of $1,750,000 for the purchase of implants and orthopedic supplies and devices for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC), with no change in the original term of April 1, 2016 through March 31, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I budget. BACKGROUND: Depuy Synthes Products, Inc., has been providing implants and orthopedic supplies and devices for the CCRMC for more than ten years. CCRMC has experienced a great increase in both patient volume and in complex orthopedic surgeries which require very expensive implants and devices. Therefore, it is necessary to add money to the purchase order. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Purchase Order amendment is not approved, then the CCRMC will be unable to meet the needs of its orthopedic patients. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Margaret Harris C.148 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Depuy Synthes Products, Inc. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, an amendment to Purchase Order #10589 with Henry Schein, Inc. to increase the payment limit by $16,000 to a new payment limit of $114,000 for the purchase of dental supplies and equipment for the Public Health Clinic Services Dental Program, with no change in the original term of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funded by Federally Qualified Health Centers. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa Health Services Public Health Division Clinic Services (PHCS) runs licensed dental clinics that serve children and adults throughout the county. These clinics occur on two dedicated dental mobile health units, Kennedy High School Health Center and other school-based health center locations. Dental supplies and equipment are required to maintain clinical operations. PHCS is requesting an increase in the existing Purchase Order by $16,000, bringing the total to $114,000 for the 2019 calendar year. This increase will allow PHCS to continue to purchase supplies necessary for clinic operations. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Rachel Birch C.149 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment to Purchase Order with Henry Schein, Inc. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If these Purchase Order is not approved, the PHCS Programs would not be able to continue providing dental services. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of Employment and Human Services a blanket purchase order with East Bay Restaurant Supply for the purchase of appliances and equipment for the renovation and relocation of the Community Services Bureau Central Kitchen not to exceed $621,750 for the period June 11, 2019 through December 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Purchase Order not to exceed $621,750, funded by 100% Federal revenue. BACKGROUND: Employment and Human Services, Community Services Bureau (CSB), will renovate and relocate the CSB Central Kitchen using the blanket purchase order for East Bay Restaurant Supply. The Central Kitchen provides over 30,000 meals a month in 16 centers to children and families in need, resulting in 2/3 of a child’s daily nutritional needs met. CSB has been providing high quality and nutritious APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres, 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.150 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with East Bay Restaurant Supply BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) food to all CSB Head Start centers from the Central Kitchen “hub” since 1990. The Central Kitchen currently located at the Brookside Center is in urgent need of relocation due to the aging facilities and potential safety concerns. CSB's childcare portion of this facility was closed in June of 2018 and the children and staff were relocated elsewhere. This action would allow the Kitchen to also be relocated by renovating an alternate location in an existing County building nearby: the Richmond Veterans Memorial Hall in Richmond. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without funding, orders for appliances and equipment could not be processed to complete renovation and relocation of the EHSD Community Services Bureau central kitchen. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Uplift Family Services, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $539,167 to provide kinship support services in Central and West Contra Costa County for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: The funds allocated for this contract are 100% State 2011 Realignment. BACKGROUND: Uplift Family Services was selected in Fiscal Year 18/19 from a competitive procurement, Request for Proposal #1159, to provide the Kinship Support Services Program for Central and West Contra Costa County. The Kinship program provides community-based family support services to relative caregivers and the dependent children placed in their homes by the juvenile court as well as for those who are at risk of dependency or delinquency. Additionally, the Kinship program provides post-permanency services to relative caregivers who have become the legal guardian or adoptive parent of formerly dependent children. Uplift Family Services will provide multiple support services for relative caregivers including site based mentoring, case management, support groups, recreational/group activities, respite, and educational forums. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: V. Kaplan, (925) 608-4963 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.151 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Uplift Family Services CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: These services are necessary to support relative caregivers in successfully raising their kin and preventing the removal of children from an extended family when the biological parents are unable to provide care. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This contract supports all five of the community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card: 1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; 2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; 3) "Families that are Economically Self Sufficient"; 4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and 5) "Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families" by providing family support, stability, and safety of children, thereby preventing out-of-home placement. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Director, to execute a Purchase Order with Groupware Technology, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $620,630 for the purchase of a Cisco MDS 9706 Switch for the Health Services Department's Pittsburg Data Center. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: Health Services Department (HSD) Information Technology currently owns a Cisco MDS 9706 Switch at the Pittsburg Data Center and utilizes Cisco’s Smartnet Support Services. HSD IT is replacing the switch, which will increase capacity from 8 Gbps (gigabits per second) to 16 Gbps. The new equipment will provide high-performance security for encrypted traffic, robust traffic inspection at higher outputs, and support faster connection speeds for the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system. The new switch will be supported by Cisco under a previously executed agreement. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Renee Nunez C.152 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order for Groupware Technology, Inc. for Cisco MDS 9706 Switch CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Quality of patient care could be negatively impacted without the purchase of this new switch. If the old switch is not replaced, HSD will be unable to accommodate secured faster data link connectivity or provide future expansion capacity for infrastructure supporting the Epic Upgrade taking place in October 2019. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment #23-646-1 with Eighty 20 Healthcare Consulting, LLC, a limited liability company, to amend Contract #23-646, effective April 20, 2019, to increase the payment limit by $170,000, from $150,000 to a new payment limit of $320,000, with no change in the term of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020, to provide additional consultation, technical support and planning services with regard to transitioning the West Contra Costa Health Care District (WCCHCD) to County. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: On December 4, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-646 to provide consultation, technical support and planning services to the Chief Operating Officer with regard to the transition of the WCCHCD to Contra Costa County including but not limited to financial planning and operational improvement for the period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 925-957-5405 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: L Walker, M Wilhelm C.153 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #23-646-1 with Eighty 20 Healthcare Consulting, LLC BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract Amendment #23-646-1 will allow the Contractor to provide additional services through December 31, 2020. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the Health Services Department will not be able to use Contractor’s expertise in the transition of WCCHCD to Contra Costa County. ATTACHMENTS RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract #23-074-41 with Foley & Lardner, LLP, a limited liability partnership, in an amount not to exceed $450,000, for the provision of legal services related to Medi-Cal audit appeals and other Contra Costa Health Plan appeals, report issues, and authorized litigation issues, for the period from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded by 100% by Hospital Enterprise I Fund. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: Since 1985, this Contractor, which specializes in health care law, has been providing legal services in the form of consultation, research, opinion, advice and representation for the Health Services Director with regard to Medi-Cal audit appeals and other Contra Costa Health Plan appeals, report issues, and authorized litigation issues. On May 22, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-074-40 with Foley & Lardner, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patrick Godley, 925-957-5405 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C.154 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract #23-074-41 with Foley & Lardner, LLP BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) LLP, for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019 for the provision of temporary legal services with regard to Medi-Cal audit appeals and other authorized litigation issues. Approval of Contract #23-074-41 will allow the Contractor to continue to provide specialized legal services, as requested by the Health Services Director, through June 30, 2020. This contract includes mutual indemnification. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the County will not be able to receive specialized services with regard to Medi-Cal audit appeals and other Departmental Health Plan appeals, report issues, and authorized litigation issues. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to execute a contract, approved as to form by County Counsel, with Nossaman LLP in an amount not to exceed $630,000 for state advocacy services for the period July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2022, as recommended by the Legislation Committee at their May 13, 2019 meeting. The Legislation Committee directed that the procurement process be conducted to secure state legislative advocacy services for a three-year contract with two (2) single year options to renew to the successful responder. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract provides a monthly retainer of $17,500 for an annual cost of $210,000 for three fiscal years. The appropriations for this contract will be budgeted in the County Administrator's Office. BACKGROUND: At its August 13, 2018 meeting, the Legislation Committee directed CAO staff to conduct a procurement process for the State and Federal Advocacy Services contracts for the period FY 2019/20 through FY 21/22 with two single year options to renew to the successful responder. Pursuant to this direction, CAO staff prepared and distributed the Request for Qualifications (Attachment B), which was issued on March 27, 2019 for the State Legislative Advocacy Services. The RFQ was posted on BidSync and distributed to all advocates serving CSAC and UCC counties. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.155 To:Board of Supervisors From:LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:State Advocacy Services Contract BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) RFQ Results A total of three responses were received in the County Administrator's Office by the deadline. Responses were received from the following firms: 1. Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Gross & Leoni LLP 2. Nossaman LLP 3. Quintana, Watts & Hartmann Following the requirements of the RFQ and standard procurement processes, a County Selection Committee (CSC) was convened to review and rate the responses. The CSC was composed of the following individuals: Supervisor Diane Burgis, District II, Chair of the Legislation Committee Chief Assistant County Administrator, Timothy Ewell Employment and Human Services Director Kathy Gallagher Health Services Administrator Joshua Sullivan Water Agency Manager Ryan Hernandez The CSC convened on May 1, 2019 to score the received responses and select firms for interview. Two of the responding firms for the State Advocacy Services were invited to interview: Nielsen Merksamer and Nossaman LLP. Upon conclusion of the interview process, the CSC recommended that the contract award be made to the following: State Legislative Advocacy Services: Nossaman LLP The CSC recognized the excellent service provided by the incumbent firm, Nielsen Merksamer, with primary service from Cathy Christian and Ben Palmer. However, the service model proposed by Nossaman, with two lead representatives, and the experience and expertise of the proposed staff, made Nossaman the consensus choice of the County Selection Committee. The Legislation Committee considered this matter at its May 13, 2019 meeting and voted to support the recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. The RFQ response from Nossaman LLP is Attachment A. A contract for services is in development. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Nossaman LLP Response Attachment B--2019 State Advocacy Services RFQ Attachment C: Other Responses Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A Attachment A COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS No. 1902-329 For STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES Written questions about this RFQ can be submitted by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on April 3, 2019 to: lara.delaney@cao.cccounty.us Thank you in advance for your interest in this opportunity and for your efforts in preparing your response. DATE ISSUED: MARCH 27, 2019 RESPONSE DUE by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on APRIL 24, 2019 At Contra Costa County Administrator’s Office 651 Pine Street, 10th Floor Martinez, CA 94553 Attachment B COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS No. 1902-329 For STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 of 2 Page I. ACRONYM AND TERM GLOSSARY ....................................................................................... 4 II. STATEMENT OF WORK A. Intent ...................................................................................................................................... 4 B. Scope ...................................................................................................................................... 4 C. Background ........................................................................................................................... 6 D. Minimum Qualifications ........................................................................................................ 7 E. Specific Requirements .......................................................................................................... 7 F. Deliverables/Reports .............................................................................................................. 8 III. INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDERS G. Correspondence...................................................................................................................... 9 H. Calendar of Events ................................................................................................................. 9 I. Submittal of Responses ........................................................................................................ 10 J. Response Format .................................................................................................................. 11 K. Evaluation Criteria/Selection Committee ............................................................................ 11 L. Notice of Intent to Award .................................................................................................... 12 M. Disputes Relating to Proposal Process and Award ............................................................. 12 IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS N. Term / Renewal .................................................................................................................... 13 O. Pricing .................................................................................................................................. 13 P. Award ................................................................................................................................... 14 Q. Method of Ordering ............................................................................................................. 14 R. Invoicing .............................................................................................................................. 15 S. Account Manager/Support Staff .......................................................................................... 15 T. General Requirements ......................................................................................................... 15 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS No. 1902-329 For STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A – Fee Schedule Exhibit B – Response Content and Submittal Completeness Checklist Exhibit C – Standard Contract Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 4 of 15 I. ACRONYM AND TERM GLOSSARY Unless otherwise noted, the terms below may be upper or lower case. Acronyms will always be uppercase. Bidder or Responder Shall mean the specific person or entity responding to this RFQ Board Shall refer to the County of Contra Costa Board of Supervisors CAO Shall refer to the County Administrator’s Office CSC Shall refer to County Selection Committee Contractor When capitalized, shall refer to selected responder that is awarded a contract County When capitalized, shall refer to the County of Contra Costa Federal Refers to United States Federal Government, its departments and/or agencies FY Shall mean Fiscal Year Labor Code Refers to California Labor Code Proposal Shall mean responder/contractor response to this RFQ Request for Qualifications Shall mean this document, which is the County of Contra Costa’s request for contractors’/responders’ proposal to provide the services being solicited herein; also referred herein as RFQ Response or Submittal Shall refer to responder’s proposal submitted in reply to RFQ RFQ Request for Qualifications State Refers to State of California, its departments and/or agencies II. STATEMENT OF WORK A. INTENT The intent of this Request for Qualifications (RFQ) is to describe state legislative advocacy and related services required by the County of Contra Costa and to solicit qualifications from experienced providers to professionally and effectively represent the County’s interests in Sacramento. The County intends to award a three-year contract with two (2) single year options to renew to the successful responder whose response conforms to the RFQ and meets the County’s requirements. B. SCOPE Contra Costa County is seeking qualifications from experienced providers of State legislative advocacy services to professionally and effectively represent the County’s interests in Sacramento. The purpose of the State legislative program is to secure legislation that benefits the County and its residents while seeking to mitigate or oppose legislation that would adversely impact the County’s delivery of service; to secure State funding through the grant and/or appropriations process; and to shape public policy in priority areas that impact County government. The successful responder will work in a proactive manner to protect and advance the County’s interests in Sacramento. This includes lobbying the State Legislature and Administration to ameliorate budget proposals that negatively affect the County’s interests and aggressively seek Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 5 of 15 opportunities to enhance the County’s budget. Services required by the County include legislative and administrative representation with members of the executive branch, members and staff of the legislature, pertinent State offices and agencies, and relevant interest groups, coalitions, and associations. The successful Contractor will meet with State authorities and represent the County’s interests as directed by the County. The legislative advocate will also work with the Board of Supervisors, the Legislation Committee, the County Administrator, department heads and/or assigned departmental staff on a legislative agenda to advance the County’s interests. This includes tracking and suggesting opportunities to change State policy in ways that will benefit residents of Contra Costa County. The Contractor shall report to the County Administrator’s Office. The CAO coordinates the County’s Legislative activities, as summarized below. 1. Annual Legislative Program The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopts an annual State Legislative Platform in January of each year1. Prior to developing this Platform, the CAO’s office invites input from all County departments, the Board of Supervisors, its subcommittees, and its advisory bodies. From this input, the State Legislative Platform is developed. The County’s State Legislative Platform includes legislative proposals and priorities, as well as the County’s position on various policy issues. The Platform is submitted to the Board of Supervisors through the County’s Legislation Committee, which typically approves the draft legislative Platform in December. The Platform is amended throughout the year as new legislative issues arise. 2. Legislation Committee In 2007, the County established the Legislation Committee as a means of coordinating the review of legislative matters of interest to the County. (The Board’s Transportation, Water, and Infrastructure Committee reviews legislative matters related to transportation, water, and other infrastructure.) The Legislation Committee meets monthly to review the impact of State and Federal legislation on the County. The Committee receives regular updates from the County’s State and Federal legislative advocates and advises the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator on legislative matters affecting the County. 3. Issues of Particular Concern to the County The County’s Legislative Platform identifies legislative and regulatory advocacy priorities which include Health Care, Homelessness, Realignment Implementation, the State Budget, and Water and Levees/the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Of particular concern is the impact of the State Budget on the County, including the realignment of State programs to the County level. It is expected that the State legislative advocate will provide guidance to the County on these matters and strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts. 1 The Board’s adopted Platform is available at: http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/2859/Legislation Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 6 of 15 C. BACKGROUND Contra Costa County was incorporated in 1850 as one of the original 27 counties of California. A five-member Board of Supervisors, each elected to four-year terms in district nonpartisan elections, serves as the legislative body of the County, which has a general law form of government. Also elected are the County Assessor, Auditor-Controller, Clerk-Recorder, District Attorney, Sheriff-Coroner and Treasurer-Tax Collector. The County Administrator, David Twa, is appointed by the Board as the chief executive officer and directs the day-to-day government operations of the County. The County Administrator is also responsible for presenting the Board with a Recommended Budget for consideration of adoption as the Final (Adopted) Budget, which serves as the foundation of the County’s financial planning and control. Contra Costa is one of nine counties in the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Area and the ninth most populous county in California with an estimated population of 1,149,363 as of January 1, 2018. The County covers about 733 square miles and extends from the northeastern shore of the San Francisco Bay easterly about 50 miles to San Joaquin County. The County is bordered on the south and west by Alameda County and on the north by the Suisun and San Pablo Bays. The western and northern shorelines are highly industrialized, while the interior sections are suburban/residential, commercial and light industrial. The County contains 19 cities, the most populous of which include Richmond in the west (pop. 110,967); Antioch in the northeast (113,061); and Concord in the middle (129,159). The County agencies/departments include: Agriculture, Animal Services, Assessor, Auditor- Controller, Child Support Services, Clerk-Recorder, Conservation & Development, County Administrator, County Counsel, District Attorney, Employment and Human Services, Contra Costa Consolidated Fire, Health Services, Human Resources, Information Technology, Library, Probation, Public Defender, Public Works, Risk Management, Sheriff-Coroner, Treasurer-Tax Collector, and Veterans Services. The County employs approximately 9,801 permanent full-time employees. The General Fund budget for FY 2018-19 is $1.77 Billion, with a total adjusted budget, excluding Fire and special districts, for FY 2018-19 of $3.77 Billion. With respect to its State advocacy services, the County presently contracts with Nielsen Merksamer Parrinello Gross & Leoni, LLP. This firm has been under contract since 2004 as the County’s state legislative advocates and receives a monthly retainer of $15,000. The contract expires on June 30, 2019. D. MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS 1. Responders shall be regularly and have been continuously engaged in the business of providing State legislative advocacy to local governments for at least five (5) years (does not have to be consecutive service or with the same jurisdiction), preferably to urban county governments. 2. Responders shall have an office based in Sacramento with at least two non-clerical staff who would be assigned full-time or part-time to this contract who possess significant experience testifying at hearings before the Legislature and State agencies. Responders must submit names and resumes. Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 7 of 15 3. Responders shall have relationships with the County’s legislative delegation and their staff. Responders must provide a list of contacts and/or supporting documentation that demonstrates existing relationships. The list need not be comprehensive. 4. Responders shall have broad bipartisan relationships with State legislators, legislative staff, State agencies, and executive branch officials. Responders must provide a list of contacts or supporting documentation that demonstrates existing relationships. The list need not be comprehensive. 5. Responders shall possess the proven ability to initiate, develop, and carry out effective strategies to influence legislative and administrative activities and to effectively lobby on behalf of the County. 6. Responders shall possess all permits, licenses and professional credentials necessary to perform the required legislative advocacy services. 7. Responders’ other clients should not pose conflict of interest issues for the County, nor should their interest be in direct conflict with the County’s mission. Any response that does not demonstrate that the Responder meets these minimum requirements by the deadline to submit proposals will be considered non-responsive and will not be eligible for evaluation for award of the contract. E. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS/SCOPE OF WORK The selected Responder shall advise, counsel, and represent the County in pursuing legislative initiatives and funding before the California Legislature and the Executive Branch of State government. Under the direction of the County Administrator, the State legislative advocate will provide, at a minimum, the following services: 1. Energetically represent the County and serve as a liaison between the California State Legislature, the Governor, State administration officials, and other State Department representatives. 2. Maintain regular, routine communication with the County Administrator’s Office regarding issues of importance to the County Board of Supervisors, the County Administrator, and Department heads. 3. Provide the County Administrator’s Office with timely reports during session and on an "as needed" basis when the Legislature is not in session. 4. Work with the legislative members and staff to implement the legislative objectives approved by the County, including (if necessary) obtaining sponsorship of bill(s) or amendment(s) to bill(s) consistent with the legislative agenda and Platform approved by the County Board of Supervisors. 5. Assist the County in developing strong relations with the County’s legislative delegation, legislative leaders and the Administration. This includes developing a target list of key Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 8 of 15 influencers from both parties in the Legislature and proactively developing relationships between these members and County leaders. 6. Draft and/or assist in drafting materials, correspondence, legislation, amendments, and resolutions to advocate in support of the County’s legislative goals. 7. Monitor all bills of interest to the County and take action on such legislation as directed by the County Administrator’s Office. For bills or amendments passed into law that affect the County, Contractor shall monitor the implementation of those laws and advise the County on the action needed to ensure proper implementation and compliance. 8. Provide logistical support to arrange appointments and meetings with members of the Legislature, Administration, and State agencies, as needed. This includes preparing talking points and/or briefing materials as needed. 9. Serve as the liaison to the California State Association of Counties (CSAC), Urban Counties of California (UCC), and, as requested, to other state professional organizations. 10. Lead the County in developing and implementing an effective State advocacy strategy and annual legislative program to: a. Influence State laws and policies as they relate to County priorities, programs and operations, including enacting legislation which accomplish specific County goals; and b. Identify opportunities to increase funding for County priorities, programs and operations. The advocate will be proactive in opposing legislation or statutes that may have a negative impact on funding. 11. Research and provide information to the County on such matters as: a. State Budget: Prepare written reports of analysis of State Budget actions and their impact on the County. b. State bills and laws: Monitor legislation affecting County programs and alert the County Administrator’s Office and appropriate departmental staff. c. Funding opportunities and availability. d. Legislative hearings, reports and testimony. e. State regulations, guidelines, directives and other administrative policies, both proposed and adopted. f. Technical memoranda and reports impacting County operations; and g. Perform other related duties as mutually agreed upon. Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 9 of 15 F. DELIVERABLES/REPORTS 1. Report on and advise the County on relevant State legislation, proposed and adopted, and administrative actions that affect County programs. Reporting will include, at a minimum: a. a yearly summary on major activities and accomplishments; b. participation in monthly conference calls with the Legislation Committee to provide updates on legislative activities, pending legislation, and all budget related matters; and c. at least two (2) visits per year to the County which will include meetings with Board members/staff, County administrative and departmental staff. 2. Regular e-mails regarding budget and/or legislative updates. 3. Report of County sponsored, supported and opposed bills, to be included in the annual Legislative Platform. III. INSTRUCTIONS TO RESPONDERS G. CORRESPONDENCE As of the issuance of this RFQ, Responders are specifically directed not to contact County personnel for meetings, conferences or technical discussions related to this RFQ. Failure to adhere to this policy may result in disqualification of the Responder. All questions regarding the proposal must be directed to Lara DeLaney, Senior Deputy County Administrator at: lara.delaney@cao.cccounty.us. Include RFQ #1902-329 in the Subject line. The deadline for submitting questions for this RFQ is on or before 12:00 noon on April 3, 2019. All questions will be answered and disseminated to those registered on the BidSync website; BidSync is a web-based government bidding system. It is the responsibility of each responder to be familiar with all of the specifications, terms and conditions. By the submission of a Bid, the Responder certifies that if awarded a contract they will make no claim against the County based upon ignorance of conditions or misunderstanding of the specifications. H. CALENDAR OF EVENTS Event Date/Location Request Issued March 27, 2019 Written Questions Due by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on April 3, 2019 Response Due by 12:00 p.m. (noon) on April 24, 2019 Interviews Week of May 6, 2019 Legislation Committee Recommendation May 13, 2019 Board Award Date May 21, 2019 Contract Start Date July 1, 2019 Note: Award date is approximate. Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 10 of 15 I. SUBMITTAL OF RESPONSES 1. All responses must be SEALED and must be received at the County Administrator’s Office by 12:00 p.m. on the due date specified in the Calendar of Events. NOTE: LATE AND/OR UNSEALED REPONSES CANNOT BE ACCEPTED. IF HAND DELIVERING RESPONSE, PLEASE ALLOW TIME FOR METERED STREET PARKING OR PARKING IN PUBLIC PARKING LOTS. Responses will be received only at the address shown below, and by the time indicated in the Calendar of Events. Any response received after said time and/or date or at a place other than the stated address cannot be considered and will be returned to the responder unopened. 2. Responses are to be addressed and delivered as follows: State Legislative Advocacy Services RFQ #1902-329 Contra Costa County, County Administrator’s Office 651 Pine Street, 10th floor Martinez, CA 94553 3. Responders are to submit one (1) original hard copy response, with original blue ink signatures, plus five (5) copies of their proposal. Original response is to be clearly marked, printed on plain white paper, and must be either loose leaf or in a 3-ring binder (NOT bound). It is preferred that all responses submitted shall be printed double-sided and on minimum 30% post-consumer recycled content paper. 4. Responders must also submit an electronic copy of their proposal. The electronic copy must be a single file, scanned image of the original hard copy with all appropriate signatures, and must be on a disk or USB flash drive and enclosed with the sealed hard copy of the response. 5. Responder’s name and return address must also appear on the mailing package. 6. No email (electronic) or facsimile responses will be considered. 7. Responder agrees and acknowledges all RFQ specifications, terms and conditions and indicates ability to perform by submission of its response. 8. All costs required for the preparation and submission of a bid shall be borne by Responder. 9. Proprietary or Confidential Information: No part of any response is to be marked as confidential or proprietary. County may refuse to consider any response o r part thereof so marked. Responses submitted in response to this RFQ may be subject to public disclosure. County shall not be liable in any way for disclosure of any such records. Additionally, all responses shall become the property of County. County reserves the Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 11 of 15 right to make use of any information or ideas contained in submitted responses. This provision is not intended to require the disclosure of records that are exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act (Government Code Section 6250, et seq.) or of “trade secrets” protected by the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (Civil Code Section 3426, et seq.). 10. All other information regarding the responses will be held as confidential until such time as the County Selection Committee has completed their evaluation and an intended award has been made by the County Board of Supervisors. The submitted proposals shall be made available upon request no later than five (5) business days after approval of the award and contract is scheduled to be heard by the Board of Supervisors. All parties submitting proposals, either qualified or unqualified, will receive mailed intent to award/non-award notifications, which will include the name of the responder to be recommended for award of this project. 11. Each response received, with the name of the responder, shall be entered on a record, and each record with the successful response indicated thereon shall, after the award of the order or contract, be open to public inspection. J. RESPONSE FORMAT 1. Responses are to be straightforward, clear, concise and specific to the information requested. 2. In order for responses to be considered complete, Responder must provide all information requested. See Exhibit B, Response Content and Submittals Completeness Checklist. K. EVALUATION CRITERIA/SELECTION COMMITTEE All proposals will be evaluated by a County Selection Committee (CSC). The County Selection Committee may be composed of Board Members, County staff and other parties that may have expertise or experience in State legislative advocacy services. The CSC will select a contractor in accordance with the evaluation criteria set forth in this RFQ. The evaluation of the proposals shall be within the sole judgment and discretion of the CSC. All contact during the evaluation phase shall be through the County Administrator’s Office only. Responders shall neither contact nor lobby evaluators during the evaluation process. Attempts by Responder to contact and/or influence members of the CSC may result in disqualification of Responder. As a result of this RFQ, the County intends to award a contract to the responsible responder whose response conforms to the RFQ and whose response presents the greatest value to the County, all evaluation criteria considered. The combined weight of the evaluation criteria is greater in importance than cost in determining the greatest value to the County. The goal is to award a contract to the responder that proposes to the County the best quality of services as determined by the combined weight of the evaluation criteria. Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 12 of 15 The evaluation process may include a two-stage approach including an initial evaluation of the written proposal and preliminary scoring to develop a short list of responders that will continue to the final stage of oral presentation and interview and reference checks. If the two stage approach is used, responders receiving the highest preliminary scores may be invited to an oral presentation and interview. Only the responders meeting the short list criteria will proceed to the next stage. All other responders will be deemed eliminated from the process. All responders will be notified of the short list participants; however, the preliminary scores at that time will not be communicated to responders. Evaluation Criteria • Completeness of Response • Relevant Experience and Relationships • References • Understanding of the Project and Scope of Work • Presentation and Interview if required L. NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD At the conclusion of the RFQ response evaluation process (“Evaluation Process”), all responders will be notified in writing by e-mail or fax, and certified mail, by the CAO’s office of the contract award recommendation, if any. The document providing this notification is the “Notice of Intent to Award.” The Notice of Intent to Award will provide the following information:  The name of the responder being recommended for contract award; and  The names of all other parties that submitted proposals. M. DISPUTES RELATING TO PROPOSAL PROCESS AND AWARD In the event a dispute arises concerning the proposal process prior to the award of the contract, the party wishing resolution of the dispute shall submit a request in writing to the County Administrator. Responders may appeal the recommended award or denial of award, provided the following stipulations are met: 1. Appeal must be in writing. 2. Must be submitted within five (5) calendar days of the date of the letter of notification of recommended award or denial of award. 3. An appeal of a denial of award can only be brought on the following grounds: a. Failure of the County to follow the selection procedures and adhere to requirements specified in the RFQ or any addenda or amendments. b. There has been a violation of conflict of interest as provided by California Government Code Section 87100 et seq. c. A violation of State or Federal law. Appeals will not be accepted for any other reasons than those stated above. All appeals must be sent to: Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 13 of 15 David Twa, County Administrator Contra Costa County 651 Pine Street, 10th floor Martinez CA, 94553 dtwa@cao.cccounty.us The County Administrator shall make a decision concerning the appeal and notify the Responder making the appeal within a reasonable timeframe prior to the tentatively scheduled date for awarding the contract. The decision of the County Administrator shall be deemed final. IV. TERMS AND CONDITIONS N. TERM / RENEWAL 1. The term of the contract, which may be awarded pursuant to this RFQ, will be three (3) fiscal years, commencing July 1, 2019. 2. By mutual agreement, any contract which may be awarded pursuant to this RFQ may be extended for two (2) additional one year terms at agreed prices with all other terms and conditions remaining the same. O. PRICING 1. All pricing as quoted will remain firm for the term of any contract that may be awarded as a result of this RFQ. 2. Unless otherwise stated, Responder agrees that, in the event of a price decline, the benefit of such lower price shall be extended to the County. 3. Any price increases or decreases for subsequent contract terms may be negotiated between Contractor and County only after completion of the initial term. 4. All prices quoted shall be in United States dollars and "whole cent," no cent fractions shall be used. There are no exceptions. 5. Federal and State minimum wage laws apply. The County is not imposing any additional requirements regarding wages. 6. Prevailing Wages: Pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1770 et seq., Contractor shall pay to persons performing labor in and about Work provided for in Contract not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for work of a similar character in the locality in which the Work is performed, and not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for legal holiday and overtime work in said locality, which per diem wages shall not be less than the stipulated rates contained in a schedule thereof which has been ascertained and determined by the Director of the State Department of Industrial Relations to be the general prevailing rate of per diem wages for each craft or type of workman or mechanic needed to execute this contract. Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 14 of 15 P. AWARD 1. Proposals will be evaluated by a committee and will be ranked in accordance with the RFQ section entitled “Evaluation Criteria/Selection Committee.” 2. The committee will recommend award to the responder who, in its opinion, has submitted the proposal that best serves the overall interests of the County and attains the highest overall score. An award may not necessarily be made to the responder with the lowest price. 3. The County reserves the right to reject any or all responses that materially differ from any terms contained in this RFQ or from any Exhibits attached hereto, to waive informalities and minor irregularities in responses received, and to provide an opportunity for responders to correct minor and immaterial errors contained in their submissions. The decision as to what constitutes a minor irregularity shall be made solely at the discretion of the County. 4. The County reserves the right to award to a single contractor. 5. The County has the right to decline to award this contract or any part thereof for any reason. 6. Board approval to award a contract is required. 7. Final Standard Contract terms and conditions will be negotiated with the selected responder. Q. METHOD OF ORDERING 1. A signed Standard Contract will be issued upon Board approval. 2. Standard Contracts will be transmitted electronically and mailed and shall be the only authorization for the Contractor to start the contract. 3. Payments for services will be issued only in the name of Contractor. 4. Contractor shall adapt to changes to the method of ordering procedures as required by the County during the term of the contract. 5. Change orders shall be agreed upon by Contractor and County and issued as needed in writing by County. R. INVOICING 1. Contractor shall invoice the County Administrator’s Office, unless otherwise advised, upon satisfactory performance of services. 2. Payment will be made within thirty (30) days following receipt of invoice and upon complete satisfactory performance of services. Specifications, Terms & Conditions for State Legislative Advocacy Services Page 15 of 15 3. County shall notify Contractor of any adjustments required to invoice. 4. Invoices shall contain County contract number, invoice number, and remit to address and itemized services description and price as quoted. 5. Contractor shall utilize standardized invoice upon request. 6. Invoices shall only be issued by the Contractor who is awarded a contract. 7. Payments will be issued to and invoices must be received from the same Contractor whose name is specified on the contract. S. ACCOUNT MANAGER/SUPPORT STAFF 1. Contractor shall provide a dedicated competent account manager who shall be responsible for the County account/contract. The account manager shall receive all contracts from the County and shall be the primary contact for all issues regarding Responder’s response to this RFQ and any contract which may arise pursuant to this RFQ. 2. Contractor shall also provide adequate, competent support staff that shall be able to service the County during normal working hours, Monday through Friday. Such representative(s) shall be knowledgeable about the contract, products offered and able to identify and resolve quickly any issues including but not limited to order and invoicing problems. 3. Contractor account manager shall be familiar with County requirements and standards and work with the CAO staff to ensure that established standards are adhered to. T. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 1. Proper conduct is expected of Contractor’s personnel when on County premises. This includes adhering to no-smoking ordinances, the drug-free work place policy, not using alcoholic beverages and treating employees courteously. 2. The County has the right to request removal of any Contractor employee or subcontractor who does not properly conduct himself/herself/itself or perform quality work. Exhibit A Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT A COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA RFQ No. 1902-329 for STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES FEE SCHEDULE Fees shall be submitted on Exhibit A as is. No alterations or changes of any kind are permitted. Responses that do not comply will be subject to rejection in total. The fees quoted below shall include all taxes and all other charges and is the cost the County will pay for the three-year term of any contract that is a result of this RFQ. Prices shall include everything necessary for the completion of and fulfillment of the contract including but not limited to furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, facilities and all management, labor, services, taxes, licenses, permits and an estimated cost for two (2) trips to Contra Costa County per year required to complete the work in accordance with the contract documents, except as may be provided otherwise in the contract documents. Responder agrees that the prices quoted are the maximum they will charge during the term of any contract awarded. 1st Year 2nd Year 3rd Year Description Unit of Measure No. Units Charge per Unit Extension Charge per unit Extension Charge per unit Extension Total for Three (3) Years A B C D = B *C E F = B*E G H = B*G I = (D + F + H) Monthly service charge for state legislative advocate program Per month 12 $$$$$$$ TOTAL COST FOR SERVICES FIRM: _________________________SIGNATURE:______________________DATE:___________ PRINTED NAME: __________________________________TITLE:__________________________ Exhibit B Page 1 of 3 EXHIBIT B RFQ No. 1902-329 for STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES RESPONSE CONTENT AND SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST 1. Responses must be signed in blue ink and include evidence that the person or persons signing the proposal is/are authorized to execute the proposal on behalf of the responder. 2. Responders shall provide all of the below noted Response documentation and exhibits. Any material deviation from these requirements may be cause for rejection of the Response, as determined in the County’s sole discretion. The content and sequence for each required Response document/exhibit shall be as follows: CHECK LIST  A. Title Page: Show RFQ number and title, your company name and address, name of the contact person (for all matters regarding the RFQ response), telephone number and proposal date.  B. Table of Contents: Responses shall include a table of contents listing the individual sections of the proposal and their corresponding page numbers.  C. Cover Letter: Responses shall include a cover letter describing Responder and include all of the following: 1) The official name of Responder; 2) Responder’s organizational structure (e.g. corporation, partnership, limited liability company, etc.); 3) The jurisdiction in which Responder is organized and the date of such organization; 4) The address of Responder’s headquarters, any local office involved in the Response; and the address/location where the actual services will be performed; 5) Responder’s Federal Tax Identification Number; Exhibit B Page 2 of 3 6) The name, address, telephone, and e-mail address of the person(s) who will serve as the contact(s) to the County, with regards to the RFQ response, with authorization to make representations on behalf of and to bind Responder; 7) A representation that Responder is in good standing in the State of California and will have all necessary licenses, permits, certifications, approvals and authorizations necessary in order to perform all of its obligations in connection with this RFQ. This requirement includes the necessity for some out of state companies to be registered with the State of California by the effective date of the agreement. Information regarding this requirement can be located at the Secretary of State website, http://www.sos.ca.gov/; and 8) An acceptance of all conditions and requirements contained in this RFQ. 9) Cover letter must be signed in blue ink by a person or persons authorized to execute the proposal on behalf of the responder.  D. Responder’s Qualifications and Experience: Provide a description of Responder’s capabilities pertaining to this RFQ. This description should not exceed three (3) pages and should include a detailed summary of Responder’s experience relative to RFQ requirements described herein.  E. Key Personnel - Qualifications and Experience: Responses shall include a complete list of and resumes for all key personnel associated with the RFQ. This list must include all key personnel who will provide services to County staff and all key personnel who will provide maintenance and support services. For each person on the list, the following information shall be included: (1) the person’s relationship with Responder, including job title and years of employment with Responder; (2) the role that the person will play in connection with the RFQ (3) address, telephone and e- mail address; (4) the person’s educational background; (5) the person’s relevant experience; and (6) relevant awards, certificates or other achievements. This section of the bid response should include no more than two pages of information for each listed person.  F. Description of the Proposed Services: Response shall include a description of the services to be provided during the contract term including response times, not to exceed three (3) pages. The description must: (1) specify how the services in the response will meet or Exhibit B Page 3 of 3 exceed the requirements of the County; (2) explain any special resources, procedures or approaches that make the services of Responder particularly advantageous to the County; and (3) identify any limitations or restrictions of Responder in providing the services that the County should be aware of in evaluating its Response to this RFQ. Responses shall include a description of Responder’s approach in providing its services to the County, stating its understanding of the work to be done and a positive commitment to perform the work as specified.  G. References: 1) Responders are to provide a list of three (3) current and three (3) former clients. References must be satisfactory as deemed solely by County. References should have similar scope, volume and requirements to those outlined in these specifications, terms and conditions. Reference information is to include:  Company/Agency name  Contact person (name and title), contact person is to be someone directly involved with the services  Complete street address  Telephone number  Dates of service 2) The County may contact some or all of the references provided in order to determine Responder’s performance record on work similar to that described in this request. The County reserves the right to contact references other than those provided in the Response and to use the information gained from them in the evaluation process.  H. Relationships: Responders must provide a list of contacts and/or supporting documentation that demonstrates existing relationships with the County’s legislative delegation. The list need not be comprehensive. Responders must provide a list of contacts and/or supporting documentation that demonstrates existing relationships with other State legislators, legislative staff, State agencies, and executive branch officials. The list need not be comprehensive.  I. Fee Schedule, Exhibit A: Prices shall include the cost of everything necessary for fulfillment of the contract requirements.  J. Evidence of Insurance: Consultant may not commence work until it has furnished evidence of the insurance required in the Standard Contract to the CAO, and the CAO has approved it, and may not continue to perform any work under the contract if the insurance required therein is no longer in effect. Exhibit C Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT C RFQ No. 1902-329 for STATE LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY SERVICES STANDARD CONTRACT Attachment C Response to Contra Costa County Request for Statements of Qualifications For Legislative Advocacy Services Submitted by Quintana, Watts & Hartmann 925 L Street, Suite 220 Sacramento, CA 95814 April 24, 2019 County of Contra Costa Request for Qualifications No. 1902-329 ORIGINAL Page 2 of 19 B. Table of Contents C. Cover Letter ............................................................................................................... 2 D. Responder’s Qualifications and Experience ........................................................... 5 E. Key Personnel – Qualifications and Experience ..................................................... 8 F. Description of Proposed Services ........................................................................... 14 G. References ............................................................................................................... 16 H. Relationships ........................................................................................................... 17 I. Fee Schedule ........................................................................................................... 19 J. Evidence of Insurance ............................................................................................ 19 Exhibit A .......................................................................................................................... 20 925 L Street, Suite 220, Sacramento, CA 95814Phone: (916) 446-5508 Fax (916) 446-1499 April 24, 2019 State Legislative Advocacy Services RFQ #1902-329 David Twa Contra Costa County, County Administrator’s Office 651 Pine Street, 10th floor Martinez, CA 94553 Subject: Cover Letter - SOQ for State Legislative Advocacy Services – RFQ# 1902-329 Dear Mr. Twa, The firm of Quintana, Watts & Hartmann, LLC ("QWH”) is pleased to present this Statement of Qualifications to Contra Costa County, jointly with the firms of Smith, Watts & Hartmann (“SWH”), and Loomis Advocacy Solutions (“LAS”). This is in response to the County’s “Request for Statements of Qualifications” for State Legislative Advocacy Services, as indicated in the RFQ No. 1902-329. Quintana, Watts & Hartmann will serve as the primary consultant for the purposes of this SOQ. In accordance with the requirements of the RFP, the following information is provided: Bidder Information: The legislative advocacy firm of Quintana, Watts & Hartmann, LLC is the primary bidder. The firm is structured as a limited liability company, as a partnership, made up of six partners, David Quintana, Mark Watts, Audra Hartmann, Bill Barnaby, Sr., Bill Barnaby, Jr. and Sean Henschel. QWH was organized under California state law, effective as of November 2018. However, two of the Partners, Mark Watts and Audra Hartmann are also partners in Smith, Watts & Hartmann, which has operated in one form or another continuously since 1982. QWH has two locations in Sacramento. Firm Locations: Headquarters: Quintana, Watts & Hartmann, LLC 1215 K Street, Suite 1110 Sacramento, CA 95814 Administrative Office: Quintana, Watts & Hartmann, LLC 925 L Street, Suite 220 Sacramento, CA 95814 Federal Tax Identification Number: 83-2406838 Page 4 of 19 The firm’s contact is as follows: Audra Hartmann Quintana, Watts & Hartmann 925 L Street, Suite 220 Sacramento, CA 95814 Fax: 916-446-5508 Email: audra@qwhlobby.com Firm Representations: QWH, and its subconsultants, SWH and LAS are in good standing with the State of California to do business throughout the state and each of the principals are duly registered under California State Law with the Secretary of State as lobbyists. Firm Acceptance: QWH, its subconsultants and each of the firm’s principals have read and understood all the requirements in the RFQ and accept all requirements and conditions if awarded the contract. This SOQ and is content is valid for 180 days from the date of this letter. We very much look forward to your response to our Statement of Qualifications. Again, thank you for the opportunity to present our qualifications. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Audra or Mark at 916-446-5508. Sincerely, Audra Hartmann, Principal cc: Mark Watts, Smith, Watts & Hartmann, LLC Pamela Loomis, Loomis Advocacy Solutions Page 5 of 19 Statement of Qualifications D. Responder’s Qualifications and Experience Quintana, Watts & Hartmann (QWH) is a Sacramento-based lobbying and consulting firm comprised of seasoned veterans who have extensive experience representing local and tribal governments, Fortune 500 companies, primary and secondary education, and transportation and water districts. Our partners have a deep understanding of the legislative and state budget processes and have a track record of success for our clients by passing legislation, securing funding through the state budget or other state programs, and defeating legislative initiatives with adverse impacts. The QWH partners who would be working with Contra Costa have been representing local governments for over 20 years. Our local government clients include local and regional transportation clients based in San Francisco, Contra Costa County, Riverside County, San Diego County and San Joaquin County. We represent a water authority in Southern California on regulatory issues and are working with a Northern California tribal government. For the services outlined in the Contra Costa RFQ, QWH is proposing to work with Loomis Advocacy Solution, hereinafter referred to as (“The Team”), to provide expert advocacy and consulting services to the county. The breadth of The Team will ensure not only sufficient resources, but as we each have our strengths with respect to the Legislature and the State Administration, we believe that we can conduct a very thorough and effective lobbying effort on behalf of Contra Costa. The Team will be comprised of Mark Watts and Audra Hartmann of Quintana, Watts & Hartmann (“QWH”), and Pam Loomis of Loomis Advocacy Solutions (“LAS”). QWH is presently operating as a limited liability company in the State of California. It has two offices in Sacramento. Mark Watts and Audra Hartmann are located at 925 L Street, Suite 220, Sacramento CA, 95814. LAS is operating as a sole proprietorship in the State of California and is located at 925 L Street, Suite 220, Sacramento, CA 95814. We have provided examples below of the work that we have done for clients at the Legislature and at various state agencies. Gerdau Steel – Ms. Hartmann worked with Gerdau Steel, a California manufacturer of steel rebar, to gain passage of legislation that creates GHG benchmarks for a select list of energy-intensive products that are used in large infrastructure projects. This legislation encourages the State to use its purchasing power to procure cleaner/greener products that go into large projects. It also conforms the State’s infrastructure purchasing practices with its GHG policies. Ms. Hartmann’s work on this issue started with the creation of a coalition of supporters comprised of Ms. Hartmann’s client, a key environmental group and the steel workers union. From the beginning, Ms. Hartmann was involved in the development of the strategy for the bill and the drafting of the bill language and amendments. She worked closely with the coalition of supporters to directly advocate for the measure with Legislators and their staff, Governor’s staff, agency representatives and with other stakeholders. Ms. Hartmann also helped negotiate with several opponents of the measure. By listening to their concerns and working with the author and supporters to craft acceptable amendments, we were able to get the bill’s Page 6 of 19 opponents to remove their opposition to the measure. The measure, Assembly Bill 262, passed the Legislature with bi-partisan support and was signed by the Governor on October 15, 2017. Central Valley Gas Storage– In 2016, Ms. Hartmann worked with several companies and their lobbyists to form an informal coalition of the private owners of natural gas storage facilities. The Independent Storage Producers (ISPs), as they were called, were formed to work on SB 887 introduced by Senator Pavley. Ms. Hartmann represented the interests of Central Valley Gas Storage owned by Southern Company Gas. Ms. Hartmann and the informal coalition successfully negotiated language with the author of SB 887 to remove a one-size-fits-all approach to well safety and instead required the Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) to develop risk-based safety plans. In addition to work done at the Legislature, this effort included setting up and participating in conversations with DOGGR’s Supervisor, staff and the government affairs lead for the agency. It also included setting up and participating in discussions with representatives from the Governor’s office. San Diego County Water Authority– Ms. Hartmann is working with a water authority to represent the agency on regulatory issues only. She is part of a team that includes Ms. Minor from Niemela Pappas and Associates. Ms. Hartmann and Ms. Minor share the contract and the work. This ensures that if a conflict does arise for one of the parties, there is at least one person available to work on the client’s issues. The work for the water authority includes: monitoring proposed regulations at the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and Department of Water Resources (DWR) and reporting on new developments to the client’s management team and staff; developing a strategy for influencing proposed regulations; attending meetings and workshops and reporting the results to the client; testifying on issues for the water authority, as needed: and setting up discussions with SWRCB staff and board members and DWR staff on key issues for the client. This regulatory work does not include any issues pertaining to the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. California’s Independent Telecommunications Companies (CITC)– Ms. Loomis serves as the chief Legislative Advocate for this diverse coalition of 10 small telephone companies serving rural California, by providing political advice, strategy and messaging development, and legislative and administrative advocacy in support of CITC’s public policy priorities. In 2012, she played a key role in the successful passage of SB 379 (Fuller) modifying rate-of-return regulation of small telephone companies by the CPUC, thereby preserving millions of dollars in federal funding. Most recently, Ms. Loomis successfully led a lobbying coalition of interested parties on behalf of CITC to extend universal service high-cost support for both large and small telephone companies until January 1, 2023. Consolidated Communications (CCI)– Ms. Loomis provides California legislative advocacy services and strategic advice for CCI, a national telecommunications company delivering advanced communications products and services to over 100,000 homes and businesses in Sacramento and Placer Counties. Since CCI’s government relations executives are not located in California, Ms. Loomis is the face of the company to the Legislature and Administration. She actively monitors legislative developments impacting the telecommunications industry, recommends a political strategy and legislative options, and then executes CCI’s adopted course of action. California Water Association (CWA)– Ms. Loomis consulted with CWA on CPUC administrative issues and provided targeted legislative advocacy on an as needed basis. In 2016, she drafted a legislative proposal on behalf of CWA to remove a statutorily required fee on customers choosing to pay their bills by credit or debit cards. In response to initial opposition from committee staff and stakeholders, Ms. Loomis negotiated amendments that changed their position from oppose to neutral and successfully guided the bill into law. Page 7 of 19 Sacramento Regional Transit District – In 2016, Mr. Watts drove a strategy to secure repayment of $50 million of TCRP funds owed to Sacramento RTD. SB 86 was a budget trailer bill that amended the 2015 Budget Act; it contained $173 million in TCRP funds, which Sacramento RTD’s portion was ranked in the top tier by CTC for repayment. Anaheim Transportation Network – In 2017 and 2018, Mr. Watts assisted the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) in securing $40 million in TIRCP. Southern California Regional Rail Authority/Metrolink – In 2017, Mr. Watts provided strategic guidance to Metrolink, in pursuant of TIRCP funds. The state awarded Metrolink more than $800 million in TIRCP and multi-year funds. Page 8 of 19 E. Key Personnel – Qualifications and Experience MARK WATTS Founding Partner with Quintana, Watts & Hartmann, LLC POSITION: Founding, Quintana, Watts & Hartmann, LLC TENURE: November 2018-Present Sacramento, CA 95814 DUTIES: Serves as an advocate for QW&H offering a full range of services necessary to monitor and represent private and public interests before California State, regional, and local governments. These services include consulting and advocacy on the cost and availability of energy, and the development and implementation of plans, programs, and policies to better utilize public and private transportation infrastructure. The firm assists clients with strategies that enable them to capture additional resources for and expedite implementation of major infrastructure programs. The firm also advises on environmental, financial, political and community processes and issues. Clients include major manufacturers, residential and commercial developers, city and county governments, county and regional transportation and air quality authorities POSITION: Principle, Smith, Watts & Hartmann, LLC TENURE: March 2009 – Present Sacramento, CA 95814 DUTIES: Serves as lead advocate for SWH on a full range of services necessary to monitor and represent private and public interests before California State, regional, and local governments. These services include consulting and advocacy on the cost and availability of energy, and the development and implementation of plans, programs, and policies to better utilize public and private transportation infrastructure. The firm assists clients with strategies that enable them to capture additional resources for and expedite implementation of major infrastructure programs. The firm also advises on environmental, financial, political and community processes and issues. Clients include major manufacturers, residential and commercial developers, city and county governments, county and regional transportation and air quality authorities. POSITION: Partner, California Strategies TENURE: January 2007 – March 2009 Sacramento, CA 95814 DUTIES: Serves as lobbyist for a private transportation and resource consulting firm, located in Sacramento, which provides the full range of services necessary to monitor and represent private and public interests before California State, regional, and local governments. These services include consulting and advocacy on the cost and availability of energy, and the development and implementation of plans, programs, and policies to better utilize public and private transportation infrastructure. The firm assists clients with strategies that enable them to capture additional resources for and expedite implementation of major infrastructure programs. The firm also advises on environmental, financial, political and community processes and issues. Clients include major manufacturers, residential and commercial developers, city and county governments, county and regional transportation and air quality authorities. In addition, Mr. Watts serves as Executive Director of Transportation California, an organization of construction contractors, suppliers and trade unions that build major transportation projects throughout California. Mr. Watts has been involved with public/private partnerships that have led to successful state legislation and project implementation on toll roads in Orange, Riverside and San Diego Counties over the last 20 years. POSITION: Partner, Smith, Watts & Company TENURE: December 1999 – January 2007 980 Ninth Street, Suite 1560  Sacramento, CA 95814 Page 9 of 19 DUTIES: Serves as lobbyist for a private transportation and resource consulting firm, located in Sacramento, which provides the full range of services necessary to monitor and represent private and public interests before California State, regional, and local governments. These services include consulting and advocacy on the cost and availability of energy, and the development and implementation of plans, programs, and policies to better utilize public and private transportation infrastructure. The firm assists clients with strategies that enable them to capture additional resources for and expedite implementation of major infrastructure programs. The firm also advises on environmental, financial, political and community processes and issues. Clients include major manufacturers, residential and commercial developers, city and county governments, county and regional transportation and air quality authorities. POSITION: Partner, Advocation, Inc. TENURE: February 1997 – December 1999 1121 L Street, Suite 610  Sacramento, CA 95814 DUTIES: With two other partners, managed and served as lobbyist and legislative strategist for firm with more than 34 clients and annual billings of greater than $1.5 million. POSITION: Chief of Staff, Speaker, California State Assembly TENURE: January 1996 – February 1997 State Capitol, Room 219  Sacramento, CA 95814 DUTIES: Spearheaded transition of the Assembly on behalf of Assembly Speaker Curt Pringle to Republican Leadership for first time in 25 years. Oversaw all aspects of leadership from daily administration of the House, selection of entire new staff of committee consultants, and Republican policy staff operations. Established series of reforms under Speaker Pringle’s leadership, including major House budget reductions (more than $4 million), restructuring of the House rules, opening of Rules Committee hearings, and complete overhaul of the Administration arm of the Assembly. Major policy achievements included: (1) first year of modern class-size reduction for California’s school children, (2) approval of the restructuring and deregulation of the electrical industry, (3) significant tax reductions for individuals and industry, and (4) resolution of homeowner’s insurance crisis through establishment of California Earthquake Authority and approval of mini policy for earthquake coverage. POSITION: Undersecretary for Transportation TENURE: July 1995 – January 1996 Office of the Secretary, Business, Transportation & Housing Agency 801 K Street, Suite 1918  Sacramento, CA 95814 DUTIES: Appointed by Governor Pete Wilson to oversee the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the California Highway Patrol (CHP) and the California Transportation Commission (CTC), working directly with those agencies as their policy liaison with the Secretary and the Governor’s Office. Developed master funding plan to undertake the complete retrofit of nearly 2,000 state-owned bridges, developed budget plan to complete the Governor’s commitment to add more than 500 new officers, net, to the CHP during his tenure, and developed budgets for Caltrans which saw more than 2,000 positions eliminated. POSITION: Co-Chief Administrative Officer TENURE: January 1995 – June 1995 State Capitol, Room 3016  Sacramento, CA 95814 DUTIES: Selected jointly by Assembly Speaker Willie Brown and Assembly Republican Leader Jim Brulte to become Republican Co-CAO of the Assembly Rules Committee to ensure equitable distribution of resources between parties and caucuses. Service in this capacity interrupted tenure as Undersecretary, but was approved by Governor Wilson. EDUCATION: Graduated in 1973 with B.A. in Economics, University of California Santa Barbara APPOINTMENTS: 1996 California Earthquake Authority, Founding Member (ex officio) 1996, 1997 Member of Governor’s Economic Strategy Panel 1995 California High Speed Rail Commission, vice Transportation Secretary Dunphy (one meeting) 1995 California Clean Air and Rail Passenger Bond Act, Allocation Committee (one meeting) Page 10 of 19 AUDRA HARTMANN Founding Partner with Quintana, Watts & Hartmann QUINTANA, WATTS & HARTMANN, Sacramento, CA November 2018 to present Founding Partner Provides strategic advice and advocacy to clients on a variety of energy, water, and climate issues at the California Legislature, California Public Utilities Commission, California Energy Commission, California Air Resources Board, State Water Resources Control Board, and other state agencies. SMITH, WATTS & HARTMANN, Sacramento, CA 2015 -Present Partner Provided advice and advocacy to clients on energy, water, and climate issues at the California Legislature, California Public Utilities Commission, California Energy Commission, California Air Resources Board, the State Water Resources Control Board, and other state agencies. HARTMANN STRATEGIES GROUP, Sacramento, CA 2013 – 2015 President Provided advice and advocacy to clients on legislative and regulatory issues as well as coalition building and direct lobbying. Had a strategic alliance with Smith Watts and Company, with agreement to represent and advise their energy clients. Defeated legislation in 2014 opposed by an energy efficiency client; bill would have weakened efforts to improve the energy efficiency of appliances sold in CA. Governor vetoed the bill as a result of efforts educating and engaging CA Energy Commission to oppose the bill and request a veto. Passed a legislative fix for a client that resulted in the client getting an exemption from court fees that are incurred as a result of the client’s official duties. NEXTERA ENERGY RESOURCES (NEER), Sacramento, CA 2010 – 2013 Director, Government and Regulatory Affairs Represented NEER in western states on legislative and regulatory issues. Primary focus was on CA, AZ, CO, HI, NV, NM and WY. Developed and implemented political contribution plans as well as managed contract lobbyists. Developed strategy, lobbied and passed legislation that created a special tax benefit in Colorado for renewable energy, resulting in a $4M benefit to company. Amended provisions into the 33% renewables portfolio standard legislation, allowing certain facilities outside of California to qualify as preferred in-state resources. Collaborated with Governor’s staff to qualify a solar facility for special California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) treatment under the AB 900 provisions, giving the facility an expedited legal process for any CEQA lawsuits. Defeated legislative attempts to impose additional visibility standards for new and existing meteorological (met) towers, saving the company several million dollars required to install lighting and retrofit existing towers. Served on and managed relationships with 5 trade groups in the West, ensuring positions taken were consistent with company goals and representing NEER during legislative lobbying efforts. Generated legislative support for a NM wind facility that was operating without a power purchase contract, resulting in the local utility contracting with the facility. Page 11 of 19 DYNEGY, Sacramento, CA 2007 – 2010 Dynegy acquired LS Power’s western facilities and employees in April 2007. Director, Government and Regulatory Affairs Represented Dynegy in CA and AZ before the legislatures and regulatory agencies. Directed the company’s interaction with Texas Legislature for the 2009 legislative session. LS POWER GENERATION, LLC, Sacramento, CA 2006 – 2007 LS Power acquired Duke Energy’s western facilities and employees in May 2006. Regional Director, Government and Regulatory Affairs Represented LS Power in CA and AZ on legislative and regulatory issues. Primary focus was on the CA Energy Commission, CA Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the AZ Corporation Commission. Represented LS Power on the boards of CA and AZ trade organizations. DUKE ENERGY, Sacramento, CA 2001 – 2006 Regional Director, State Government Affairs Represented Duke Energy in CA, AZ and WA on government and political issues by developing relationships with the Governor’s staff, state commissioners, and key legislators in order to advance Duke Energy’s goals. CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Sacramento, CA 1998 – 2001 Deputy Legislative Director/ Legislative Liaison Represented the Commission before the California Legislature in hearings and meetings with Legislators, staff and lobbyists. Managed legislative and administrative staff in the office of governmental affairs and oversaw the day-to- day operation of the office. ADDITIONAL PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE CALIFORNIA STATE LEGISLATURE, Sacramento, CA Legislative Director, California State Senator Dick Monteith Legislative Assistant, California State Senator Bill Leonard TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, Austin, TX Committee Research Assistant EDUCATION Public Administration, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA Honors: Thematic Option, General Education Honor Program Resident Honor Program, Early College Entry Page 12 of 19 PAMELA LOOMIS Sole Proprietor of Loomis Advocacy Solutions ORGANIZATION: TENURE: EXPERIENCE: ORGANIZATION: TENURE: EXPERIENCE: ORGANIZATION: TENURE: EXPERIENCE: Loomis Advocacy Solutions 925 L Street, Suite 220 Sacramento, CA 95814 March 2018 – Present Ms. Loomis is a public policy attorney who understands how to successfully navigate California’s legislative and regulatory processes. She utilizes an effective blend of political strategy, communication, and negotiation to forward her clients’ interests. Ms. Loomis facilitates favorable public policy outcomes for her clients through a powerful combination of her 24 years of experience working with state government and excellent bi-partisan relationships with legislators, Administration officials, and their staff. Currently, she represents telecommunications companies before the Legislature and CA Public Utilities Commission. Nossaman, LLP 625 Capitol Mall, Suite 2500 Sacramento, CA 95814 January 2010 – February 2018 As a Senior Policy Advisor at Nossaman, Ms. Loomis developed and implemented legislative and regulatory solutions for businesses with interests related to state government regulation in the policy areas of energy, telecommunications, water, and healthcare. She achieved successful results for her clients with the California State Legislature, the Governor’s Office, and multiple state agencies. She also advised clients with PACs on California Political Reform Act compliance and political contribution strategies. California Public Utilities Commission Office of Governmental Affairs 770 L Street, Suite 1250 Sacramento, CA 95814 June 2005 – January 2010 Before becoming a contract lobbyist, Ms. Loomis was the Director of Governmental Affairs for the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), where she effectively utilized her relationships in the Legislature to advance the Commission’s positions on the Renewable Portfolio Standard, electricity rate structuring reform, broadband infrastructure development, water ratemaking, railroad safety oversight, licensing of limousines and charter buses, telecommunications universal service programs and funds, and the state budget. Page 13 of 19 ORGANIZATION: TENURE: EXPERIENCE: EDUCATION: CA STATE BAR ADMISSION: PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS: California State Legislature State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 January 1995 – May 2005 Prior to her work at the CPUC, Ms. Loomis was the Capitol Direc tor for the Vice Chair of the Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee during the 2001 state energy crisis and beyond. She worked on legislation relating to direct access, electricity standby charges, the CPUC’s reasonableness review of utility bilateral contracts for electricity, power plant siting, and distributed generation. Ms. Loomis also served as Legislative Director for two other state Senators, as well as a Policy Consultant for the Senate Republican Caucus. As leadership staff, she helped to develop caucus positions on housing, insurance, judiciary, taxation, and transportation issues. J.D. with distinction from the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law. B.A. International Relations from the University of California, Davis. 2004: License No. 231639. The Conference of California Public Utility Counsel (CCPUC) Institute of Governmental Advocates (IGA) California Communications Association (CalCom) California Women in Energy (CAWiE) Capitol Network Page 14 of 19 F. Description of Proposed Services The Team that would be working with Contra Costa includes seasoned veterans that have extensive experience working with the Legislature, the Governor’s office and state agencies. We know how the legislative and budgeting processes work, and we have succeeded in obtaining measurable results for our clients. What sets us apart from others is the experience we have and the fact that we are a known entity to Contra Costa. Contra Costa has worked extensively with one of our Team members, Mark Watts, under an existing contract with Smith, Watts & Hartmann. Mr. Watts currently provides transportation advice and advocacy to Contra Costa. The Team is proposing to provide additional value to Contra Costa under a new contract with Quintana, Watts & Hartmann (QWH) that would cover all of the remaining issues for Contra Costa. Under this proposal, Ms. Hartmann would be the lead on the contract since she is registered to lobby for QWH. Ms. Hartmann would subcontract with Mr. Watts, who is registered to lobby for Smith, Watts & Hartmann, and with Ms. Loomis of LAS. We believe this arrangement will benefit Contra Costa because it includes Mr. Watts who already understands Contra Costa’s issues. It also adds two veteran advocates, Ms. Hartmann and Ms. Loomis, who can provide legislative and regulatory representation for Contra Costa. Ms. Hartmann currently represents clients before the California Legislature, Governor’s Office, California Public Utilities Commission, California Energy Commission, California Air Resources Board, State Water Resources Control Board, and the California Department of Water Resources. Ms. Loomis represents clients before the California Legislature, Governor’s Office, and California Public Utilities Commission. As mentioned earlier in this document, the three members of the Team work closely together and are housed in the same offices. Mr. Watts and Ms. Hartmann regularly subcontract with Ms. Loomis on legislative and regulatory issues. With regard to the scope of work, if selected to work with Contra Costa, the Team would like to set up an in-person meeting with Contra Costa’s staff to identify the organization’s goals for the coming year. This would allow the Team to begin our partnership with a clear understanding of our goals and priorities on policy as well as the overall objectives for Contra Costa. Once the key issues are identified, and goals have been set, The Team would work with Contra Costa to create a strategy for achieving those goals. The strategy would inform a course of action, such as sponsoring new legislation, or outlining the steps needed to gain support for or defeat legislation. The individual action items will be dependent on the identified goals of Contra Costa, and would include, but not be limited to the following: 1) Develop Strategy for Contra Costa a. The Team would work with Contra Costa to identify the top priorities and concerns for the year. b. The Team would work with Contra Costa to develop a list of key influencers (legislators, staff, regulators, and interest groups) and create a plan that would enable Contra Costa to develop better relationships with this group. The plan could include specific tasks such as assigning someone to establish a connection/rapport with an identified group. c. Identify and alert Contra Costa of proposed legislation and regulations that may impact Contra Costa. The issues would include policy areas that Contra Costa has identified as important, including health care, homelessness, realignment implementation, State Budget, and water issues; Page 15 of 19 d. Provide recommendations to Contra Costa on proposed policy; e.Develop a strategy on Contra Costa’s top priorities that would achieve the desired outcome. The strategy would be tailored for the needs of the specific project but could include specific steps for the lobbyists and Contra Costa staff, including recommended meetings with key officials, the development of a coalition, outreach to other like-minded organizations, and testimony before the Legislature or state agency. 2)Represent the County – The Team would represent Contra Costa before the Legislature, the Governor’s office, and state agencies on issues that are identified as important to Contra Costa. This would include: a.Setting up meetings with state legislators, regulators, and key staff to educate them on Contra Costa, discuss the proposed policy, and outline Contra Costa’s position or concerns with the proposal; b.Testifying on behalf of Contra Costa in legislative committees or before state agencies on proposed policy; c.Attending meetings and representing Contra Costa in association meetings. 3)Sponsor Legislation – If Contra Costa decides to sponsor legislation, the Team would work with Contra Costa to: a.Identify and arrange meetings with legislators that could introduce the sponsored legislation; b.Draft the legislative language and/or amendments; c.Work with Contra Costa to refine the message on legislation which includes working on: i.Position papers, ii.Fact sheets showing benefits to the local community, iii. Support and opposition letters, and iv.Any necessary material needed to advocate on behalf of Contra Costa; d. Lobby legislators and their staff to support the bill; e.Testify in Committee on the bill or arrange for staff from Contra Costa to provide testimony; f.Work with the opposition to work out concerns with the legislation; and g.Set up discussions with the Governor’s staff and, if needed, the Department of Finance to discuss any concerns they may have with the measure. 4)Communicate with Contra Costa – The Team would provide Contra Costa with written and verbal updates on legislation, proposed amendments, important proposed regulations, and other developments that could impact Contra Costa. Some of the specific updates will include: a.Legislative updates on new and proposed bills; b.Summaries of legislative hearings and regulatory meetings; c.Updates on budget developments; d.Email or verbal communications on activity that could impact Contra Costa, including any changes to the Contra Costa legislative delegation: e.A yearly summary on legislative positions, major activities, and accomplishments; f.Active participation in conference calls with Contra Costa’s legislative committee; and g.Attendance at Contra Costa meetings or Board meetings. Page 16 of 19 G. References Current Client References: Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Anne Mayer, Executive Director P.O. Box 12008 Riverside, CA 92502-2208 Phone: (951) 787-7141 Client of Smith, Watts & Hartmann from 2010 and is ongoing San Francisco County Transportation Authority (SFCTA) Tilly Chang, Executive Director 1455 Market Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94103 Phone: (415) 306-4506 Client of Smith, Watts & Hartmann from 2010 and is ongoing California Steel Industries Brett Guge, Executive Vice President P.O. Box 5080 Fontana, CA 92335 Phone: (909) 350-6208 Client of Quintana, Watts & Hartmann since 2018 (previously a client of Smith, Watts & Hartmann since 2009 Former Client References: Transportation California Will Kempton, former Executive Director (2013 – early 2017) 140 Feather Falls Circle Folsom, CA 95630 Phone: (714) 272-5270 Client of Smith, Watts & Hartmann since 2003 and is ongoing Gerdau Ameristeel Energy Inc. Samuel Harper, Regional Energy Manager 300 Ward Road Midlothian, TX 76065 Phone: (214) 463-9423 Client of Smith, Watts & Hartmann from 2011 through 2018 Messer US (Formerly Linde, LLC) Nitin Natesan, Business Development Manager, Hydrogen Fueling 2389 Lincoln Avenue Hayward, CA 94545 Phone: (908) 720-4754 Client of Smith, Watts & Hartmann from 2010 through April 2019 Page 17 of 19 H. Relationships By virtue of our past and ongoing work, as described in our decades of broad legislative experience, the Team has substantial relationships throughout the Legislature, including with the following Contra Costa legislative delegation. Senator Dodd – The Team has worked closely with the Senator and his staff on transportation and energy issues. We have known and worked with the Senator and the Senator’s Legislative Director, Les Spahn, for years. We continue to work with the Senator and Mr. Spahn on wildfire-related issues, as Senator Dodd authored the major wildfire-related bill in 2018 (SB 901) and continues to be involved in the issues. Senator Skinner – The Team has worked with Senator Skinner on a variety of topics, including renewable energy, hydrogen fueling, energy efficiency, and manufacturing issues. We regularly work with the Senator’s Legislative Director, Katerina Robinson. We also have worked closely with her newest policy consultant, Zack Leary, when he was employed with Assemblymember Burke. Senator Glazer – The Team has worked with Senator Glazer extensively on transportation issues. Assemblymember Frazier – Because of Mr. Watts work on transportation issues, he works regularly with Mr. Frazier and his personal and committee staff. Assemblymember Grayson – The Team has worked with Assemblymember Grayson on transportation and energy issues In addition to the relationships described above, the Team works regularly with a bipartisan group of legislators, legislative staff and representatives from the Governor’s office. Legislative Leadership - We have good working relationships with legislative leadership and their staff. For example, Mr. Watts works closely with the Speaker and his Chief of Staff, Carrie Cornwall, on transportation issues, and Ms. Hartmann consults regularly with Senator Atkins’ policy consultants, Kip Lipper and Deanna Spehn and the Speaker’s policy consultant on energy and environmental issues, Marie Liu. Budget Committees - We work with members of the budget subcommittees on behalf of various clients. We have good relationships with the following legislators and their staff: Senators Beall, Jones, Leyva, Monning, McGuire, Moorlach, Morrell, Nielsen, Pan, Roth, Skinner, Stern, Stone, Umberg and Wieckowski, and Assemblymembers Gomez Reyes, Frazier, Gallagher, C. Garcia, Patterson, Ramos, Rubio, Wood, Obernolte, Fong, Bloom, and Mullin. Policy Committees – The Team is working on a variety of issues that put us in front of policy committee members and their staff. We are currently talking to Senator Wiener and his staff member, Miles, about his estate tax bill. We are working with Senator Stern and his Senate Natural Resources Committee consultant, Katharine Moore, to work out differences on a gas storage bill, and we are working with Senator Borgeas and his staff on a sponsored telecommunications proposal. We have also worked closely with the Chair and Vice Chair of the Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife Committee, Assembly Members Eduardo Garcia and James Gallagher, on a host of utilities-related issues. Page 18 of 19 Last year, The Team worked with Assemblymember Aguiar Curry, her Chief of Staff, John Ferrera, and Local Government Committee Consultant, Jimmy MacDonald, to obtain an amendment for a client on PACE-related issues. Because of our efforts on AB 262 in 2017, we have a good relationship with Assemblyman Bonta, his chief of staff, Evan Corder, and his staff member, Jerome Parra. We also worked closely with Senator Hertzberg and his chief of staff, Michael Bedard, on the Senator’s energy efficiency bill. The Team has good relationships with key legislators on the Senate Health, Housing, Natural Resources and Water, Transportation, and Energy Committees and Assembly Health, Housing, Local Government, Transportation, Utilities, and Water Committees. Governor’s Office - Finally, the Team has a good relationship with the Governor’s staff. We are in conversations with several members of the Governor’s legislative and cabinet staff on wildfire issues and working with them to come up with a lasting solution. We also have existing relationships with other members of the Governor’s staff, having worked with them when they were legislative staff or members of a state agency. Page 19 of 19 I. Fee Schedule See Exhibit A J. Evidence of Insurance Evidence of insurance be provided to Contra Costa if QWH is selected to provide legislative advocacy services. Page 20 of 19 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #24-751-89 with Bay Area Community Services, Incorporated, a non-profit corporation, effective June 1, 2019, to increase the payment limit by $200,000, from $4,184,765 to a new payment limit of $4,384,765, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, and no change to the automatic extension payment limit of $1,626,742 through December 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 62% Mental Health Realignment and 38% Federal Medi-Cal. BACKGROUND: On September 11, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #24-751-87 with Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated for the provision of community services; support programs and residential mental health services including, but not limited to: vocational, community living, socialization, and Medi-Cal rehabilitative programs, for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2019. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Susanne Tavanno, 925-957-5212 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C.156 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #24-751-89 with Bay Area Community Services, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On April 30, 2019, Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy. In early May, Anka advised the Health Services Department that it would stop providing services on close of business May 31, 2019. In May 2019, the County Administrator approved Assignment #24-751-88 which assigned the contract from Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated to Bay Area Community Services, Inc. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #24-751-89 will allow the Contractor to continue providing mental health support services previously provided under this contract by Anka Behavioral Health, Inc., by providing additional funds to support the transition. This amendment will support the many administrative costs associated with ensuring a smooth transition. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, clients will not be appropriately served and transitioned from Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated to Bay Area Community Services, Inc. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Contract Amendment Agreement #24-385-48 with Bay Area Community Services, Incorporated, a non-profit corporation, effective June 1, 2019, to increase the payment limit by $100,000, from $710,797 to a new payment limit of $810,797, with no change in the original term of July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, and no change to the automatic extension payment limit of $335,398 through December 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: This contract is funded 80% Substance Abuse and Mental health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and 20% by a Project for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness (PATH) Grant. BACKGROUND: On November 6, 2018, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #24-385-46 with Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated, for the provision of mental health outreach and support services for homeless and disabled mental ill adults at the Don Brown Shelter in East Contra Costa County, for the period from July 1, 2018 through June 30, 2019, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2019. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Susanne Tavanno, 925-957-5212 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C.157 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Amendment #24-385-48 with Bay Area Community Services, Inc. BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) On April 30, 2019, Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy. In early May, Anka advised the Health Services Department that it would stop providing services on close of business May 31, 2019. In May 2019, the County Administrator approved Assignment #24-385-47 which assigned the contract from Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated to Bay Area Community Services, Inc.. Approval of Contract Amendment Agreement #24-385-48 will allow the Contractor to continue providing mental health support services previously provided under this contract by Anka Behavioral Health, Inc., by providing additional funds to support the transition. This amendment will support the many administrative costs associated with ensuring a smooth transition. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, clients will not be appropriately served and transitioned from Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated to Bay Area Community Services, Inc. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. ADOPT Resolution No. 2019/160 concerning the disbursement of reserve funds to the County in the amount of $45,302.62 by the West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management Authority (Authority) to be used to further the purposes of the Authority. 2. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Director to execute an Indemnification Agreement by and between the County and the Authority regarding the County's use of reserve funding to be disbursed to the County. 3. DIRECT staff to return and present a proposed reserve funding allocation plan, identifying recommended allowable uses which shall include but not necessarily be limited to subsidizing programs/services that directly aid in the prevention or abatement of illegal dumping within the areas served by Richmond Sanitary Service (RSS) under the County/RSS Franchise, subsidizing on-call services to customers which are not already included in approved rates, and offsetting potential future rate increases for customers in said Franchise area. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Justin Sullivan (925) 674-7812 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: C.158 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution and Indemnification Agreement for Disbursement of West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management Authority Reserve Funds to the County FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no impact to the General Fund. Expenditures will be subject to future authorization by the Board following consideration of a proposed funding allocation plan delineating the recommended allowable uses. BACKGROUND: The West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management Authority (Authority) is a joint powers agency created on April 2, 1991 by the cities of El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond and San Pablo (Member Agencies). Unlike the cities, the County is not a Member Agency and instead serves as an ex-officio non-voting member to the Authority. The Authority is responsible for regulating post-collection processing services (disposal, recyclables processing, composting and management of household hazardous waste) for the waste stream governed under the collection franchise agreements administered by the five Member Agencies as well as the waste stream governed by the County’s collection franchise agreement with Richmond Sanitary Service (RSS). The Authority also implements a variety of waste diversion programs targeting the waste stream generated within the above-mentioned West County franchise areas. The Authority participated in the public-private partnership responsible for arranging bond financing for the development and operation of the Integrated Resource Recovery Facility (IRRF) located on Pittsburg Avenue in North Richmond. In July 1993, the County Board of Supervisors approved a Land Use Permit allowing the development and operation of the IRRF. In May 1993, the County and Authority entered into an agreement (County/Authority Contract) to provide for, among other things, joint regulation of the IRRF. This agreement also established the County as a non-voting member of the Authority. The Authority (also known as RecycleMore) separately contracts with Republic Services, Inc. (Republic) for post-collection services including recyclables processing, composting, operation of the household hazardous waste facility, and the transfer, transportation and disposal of solid waste. In anticipation of the bonds being paid off concurrent with the expiration of the IRRF Service Agreement at the end of 2013, a new agreement was established between the Authority and Republic to govern the full range of post-collection services to be provided until the end of the term of the existing RSS collection Franchises. During the term of the IRRF Service Agreement, the Authority accumulated reserve funds totaling $6.65 million. These funds came from three different revenue streams: 1) Authority's share of revenues from the sale of recyclables generated by communities outside of the Authority territory (Out-Of-Area Recycling Revenue and Rate Reserves - OOA), 2) Authority's share of revenues from the sale of recyclables generated by Member Agencies with collection agreements with Republic Services (In-Area Recycling Revenue and Rate Reserves - RRRR), and 3) remaining amount from the balancing account with Republic Services (Performance Evaluation Revenue Adjustment Mechanism - PERAM). On November 8, 2018, a majority of the Authority Board approved Resolution 18-05B (Exhibit A) authorizing a disbursement of $500,000 from the OOA, RRRR, and PERAM reserve funds to Member Agencies and the County. The allocation amounts were determined using a tonnage based methodology consistent with the prior reserve disbursement allocation. The County’s share of the disbursement authorized by Resolution 18-05B is $45,302.62. County staff recommends that the County request disbursement of its share of the reserves. Under the terms of Resolution 18-05B, the disbursement may only be used to further the purposes of the Authority (i.e. uses directly related to solid waste, recycling, wastes reduction or compliance with the Integrated Waste Management Act). If this recommendation is approved, staff plans to return to the Board to present a recommended reserve funding allocation plan, which is expected to include subsidizing programs/services that directly aid in the prevention or abatement of illegal dumping within the areas served under the County/RSS Franchise, subsidizing on-call services that are not already included in approved rates, and offsetting potential future rate increases for County/RSS Franchise area customers. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County would not receive its ratepayers prorated share of excess West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management Authority reserve funding totaling $45,302.62. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/160 Exhibit A: Authority Resolution 15-05B Indemnification Agreement by and between the Authority and the County MINUTES ATTACHMENTS signed Res 2019/160 signed Res 2019/160 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/160 RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE DISBURSEMENT OF RESERVE FUNDS TO THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA BY THE WEST CONTRA COSTA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (“AUTHORITY”) AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT RELATED TO SUCH DISBURSEMENT WHEREAS, the Authority is a joint powers authority (JPA) organized under the provisions of Government Code Section 6500 et seq. (the Joint Exercise of Powers Act); WHEREAS, the cities of El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond and San Pablo (the “Member Cities”) are parties to the JPA agreement that created the Authority and the County of Contra Costa (the “County”) is an ex-officio member of the Authority; WHEREAS, the JPA agreement authorized the construction and operation of an Integrated Resource Recovery Facility (IRRF), pledged Member Cities’ waste stream control to the Authority, and placed certain municipal solid waste activities, including compliance with the Integrated Waste Management Act ("AB939") for the Member Cities, with the Authority; WHEREAS, from 1994 to 2013, the Authority was party to an agreement with Republic Services to operate the IRRF and provided for a sharing of revenues generated by the IRRF between the Authority and Republic Services (the “IRRF Service Agreement”); WHEREAS, during the term of the IRRF Service Agreement the Authority accumulated reserve funds totaling $6.65 million (the “Reserve Funds”); WHEREAS, Government Code Section 6512.1 of the Joint Exercise of Powers Act expressly permits a JPA to distribute revenues it has received from the operation of a revenue-producing facility; WHEREAS, the JPA agreement creating the Authority does not directly regulate the distribution of revenue, except upon termination of the Authority, and therefore the Authority Board of Directors has the authority and discretion to determine if, and in what manner, revenues should be distributed; WHEREAS, a majority of the Authority Board of Directors voted to distribute a portion of the Reserve Funds to the Member Cities and the County and, by Resolution 18-05B, approved the distribution of $500,000 from the Reserve Funds on the condition that (i) the recipients use the funds in ways that further the purposes of the Authority (any use that relates to solid waste, recycling, waste reduction and compliance with AB939), (ii) each Member City indemnify the Authority and each other Member City and the County from any and all claims arising out of the Authority’s disbursement of the monies , and (iii) the County indemnify the Authority and each of the Member Cities from any and all claims arising out of the Authority’s disbursement of the monies; WHEREAS, the County’s share of the disbursement authorized by Resolution 18-05B is $45,302.62 (the “County Disbursement Amount”); WHEREAS, each of the Member Cities and the County have the option of (i) leaving their share of the authorized distribution on reserve with the Authority, or (ii) requesting disbursement; WHEREAS, staff recommends requesting disbursement of the County Disbursement Amount and authorizing such funds be used only for purposes that relate to solid waste, recycling, waste reduction or compliance with AB939 within the unincorporated areas served by Richmond Sanitary Service and governed under the County’s Franchise Agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa: 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Resolution. 2. The County acknowledges receipt of the Authority Resolution 18-05B concerning the Authority’s disbursement of Reserve Funds. 3. The County’s Director of Conservation and Development, is authorized to enter into an indemnification agreement with the Authority in substantially the form attached hereto, under which the County will indemnify the Authority and the Member Cities for claims arising out of the County’s use of the Reserve Funds disbursed by the Authority to the County. 4. The Reserve Funds disbursed to the County by the Authority are to be allocated to uses that relate to solid waste, recycling, waste reduction and compliance with AB939 within the unincorporated areas served under the County’s Franchise Agreement with Richmond Sanitary Service, which could include programs to aid in the prevention or abatement of illegal dumping. Contact: Justin Sullivan (925) 674-7812 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stacey M. Boyd, Deputy cc: INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT This Indemnification Agreement (“Agreement”) is dated as of _______, 2019, and is between the WEST CONTRA COSTA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY (“Authority”), a California joint powers authority, and the COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a political subdivision of the State of California (“County”). RECITALS A. The Authority is a joint exercise of powers authority. The cities of El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond and San Pablo (the “Member Cities”) are members of the Authority and the County is an ex-officio member of the Authority. B. The Authority was created for limited and specific purposes related to solid waste, recycling services, and waste reduction. Under the JPA agreement that governs the Authority, the Authority was empowered to construct and operate an integrated resource recovery facility (“IRRF”). C. From 1994 to 2013, the Authority was party to an agreement with Republic Services, under which Republic Services operated the IRRF. The agreement provided for a sharing of revenues generated by the IRRF between the Authority and Republic Services. D. As a result of the operation of the IRRF by Republic Services, the Authority has accumulated reserves totaling $6.65 million (the “Reserves”) in three separate funds, each of which has a separate specific source. The three funds are the out-of-area fund (“OOR Fund”), the Recycling Revenue and Rate Reserve Fund (“RRRR Fund”) and the Authority’s Service Agreement closeout revenues (“PERAM fund”). E. Government Code section 6512.1 authorizes the Authority to distribute revenues generated from the IRRF to its member entities at the discretion of the Authority’s Board of Directors. F. On November 08, 2018, the Authority’s Board of Directors adopted Resolution 18-05B that authorize the disbursement of $500,000 of the Reserves to the Authority’s members, including the County, on the condition that (i) the recipients use the funds in ways that further the purposes of the Authority (i.e., any use that relates to solid waste, recycling, waste reduction or compliance with AB939), and (ii) each recipient indemnify the Authority and the Authority’s members, including the County, from any and all claims arising out of the Authority’s disbursement of the monies. G. The County’s share of the disbursement authorized by Resolution 18-05B is $45,302.62 (the “County Disbursement Amount”). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals, and in anticipation of a disbursement of funds by the Authority to the County, the parties agree as follows: 2 AGREEMENT 1. Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the County shall indemnify, defend with counsel acceptable to the Authority, and hold harmless the Authority, the Member Cities and their officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers (together, the “Indemnitees”) from the County’s share of any and all demands, claims, costs, suits, damages, liabilities and expenses, including legal costs and attorneys’ fees (collectively, “Liability”) arising out of or relating to, the County’s use of reserve funds disbursed by the Authority, except to the extent Liability is caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the Authority and provided the aggregate cost to the County of the Liability does not exceed the County Disbursement Amount. County shall immediately notify the Authority of any claim of loss against the County arising out of the disbursement of reserve funds by the Authority. 2. Interpretation of this Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding of the parties as to the subject matter of this Agreement. No prior oral or written understanding is of any force or effect with respect to the matters covered by this Agreement. This Agreement may not be interpreted for or against any party by reason of the fact that such party may have drafted this Agreement or any of its provisions. 3. Amendment. This Agreement may not be modified or amended, except by a writing that is signed by both parties. 4. Waiver. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement is binding unless it is in the form of a writing signed by the Authority, and no such waiver will operate as a waiver of any other provisions of this Agreement (whether or not similar), nor will such waiver constitute a continuing waiver. Except as specifically provided in this Agreement, no failure to exercise, or delay in exercising, any right or remedy under this Agreement constitutes a waiver thereof. 5. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement, or portion thereof, is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or otherwise unenforceable, the remaining provisions will remain enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 6. Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement is governed the laws of the State of California. If either party brings an action against the other party under this Agreement, the exclusive venue of any trial is the County of Contra Costa, State of California. 3 7. Notices. All notices, demands and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement are to be made in writing and will be deemed to have been duly given if delivered by hand or sent by certified or registered mail or overnight courier and addressed as follows: To the Authority: West Contra Costa Integrated Waste Management Authority Attention: Executive Director One Alvarado Square San Pablo, CA 94806 To the County: Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development Attention: Director of Conservation and Development 30 Muir Road Martinez, CA 94553 The parties are signing this Agreement as of the date set forth in the introductory paragraph. WEST CONTRA COSTA INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA By: George Stan Hakes, Executive Director By: John Kopchik, Director Department of Conservation and Development APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM: SHARON L. ANDERSON, COUNTY COUNSEL By: John Bakker, Authority Counsel By: Kathleen M. Andrus, Deputy County Counsel G:\Conservation\Deidra\_JPAs and Special Districts\WCCIWMA\Disbursement of Reserves\Supplemental Disbursement\BO and attachments ‐ June 2019\WCCIWMA ‐ Supp Disburse_Indem Agr 2019.docx RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the April 2019 update of the Employment and Human Services Department, Community Services Bureau, as recommended by the Employment and Human Services Director. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The Employment and Human Services Department submits a monthly report to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors (BOS) to ensure ongoing communication and updates to the County Administrator and BOS regarding any and all issues pertaining to the Head Start Program and Community Services Bureau. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: ElaineBurres 608-4960 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C.159 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:April 2019 Operations Update of the Employment and Human Services Department Community Services Bureau ATTACHMENTS CSB Apr 2019 CAO Report CSB Apr 2019 EHS CC Partnership Fiscal CSB Apr 2019 HS Fiscal CSB Apr 2019 EHS Fiscal CSB Apr 2019 Credit Card CSB Apr 2019 CACFP CSB Apr 2019 LIHEAP CSB Apr 2019 Menu P: 925 681 6300 F: 925 313 8301 1470 Civic Court , Suite 200 Concord, CA 94520 www.cccounty.us/ehsd To: David Twa, Contra Costa County Administrator From: Kathy Gallagher, EHSD Director Subject: Community Services Monthly Report Date: April 2019 News /Accomplishments  Supervisor Candace Andersen participated in our state Self -Assessment on April 19, 2019 at our Live Oak site in San Ramon. Supervisor Andersen noted excellent transition to Kindergarten, inclusive services to children with disabilities, and family engageme nt as strengths of the program. A big thank you to Supervisor Andersen!  CSB Director and several managers attended National Head Start Association’s (NHSA) annual conference in San Antonio, Texas on April 28th - May 3rd. CSB’s Director was invited back by NHSA to facilitate another round of Communities of Practice for Directors. Directors across the nation attended the session to discuss pertinent issues impacting their programs.  CSB held the Health and Nutrition Services Advisory Committee l uncheon on April 25th. Over twenty-five (25) participants from CSB and collaborative agencies were given the opportunity to problem solve current barriers to the access of medical and dental services that our families face, as well as share current and upcoming resourc es and services available in the community.  CSB Assistant Director, Education Manage r, Site Supervisors and teaching staff from Bayo Vista, George Miller Concord, George Miller III, and Riverview attended the 6th Annual Teaching Pyramid Symposium on April 26-27th at San Mateo County of Education in Redwood City. During the 2-day symposium, participants heard from keynote speaker, Julie Kurtz, who presented on “Trauma & the Pyramid: Connection & Support”. Participants also attended a series of sessions offered for different tracks such as trainers, coaches, administrators, supervisors and teachers.  All childcare partner contracts are in the process of being renewed with a 1% cost of living increase to the federal partners. State partners already receiv ed an increase in 2018.  A career fair was held at Riverview Middle School on March 28th where Monica DeVera, Amy Wells, and Cathy Lucero, presented information on the early childhood education field and the benefits of Head Start.  Two Site Supervi sors; Corrinne Williams-Lindsey, Stephanie Canulli, and two of their lead teachers, Yolanda Williams and Gemma Monreal, attended the three -day Head Start Association Region 9 Early Childhood STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Institute in Pasadena. This institute provided information to engage children in hands -on learning that is based on asking questions about their natural environment and finding answers and engaging members of the Head Start community in STEM education through stud y, dialogue and conversations with STEM experts .  Education managers presented a training to H ead Start (HS) and Early Head Start (EHS) teaching staff about child behavior and the positive behavior plan so that teachers have cc: Policy Council Chair Administration for Children and Families Program Specialist, Chris Pflaumer 2 more in-depth knowledge about how to support the social emotional needs of each child and to work closely with families to help them when behavior concerns arise.  Ligia Ortiz, Site Supervisor, and Manjeet Kaur, Infant/Toddler Teacher, attended a two- day training on “Targeted Strategies to Support Social Emotional Skills” offered by San Joaquin County Office of Education on April 1-2 in Stockton. Participants learns about activities that provide positive and explicit guidance regarding rules and expectations in all classrooms, appropriate schedules and learning activities that maximize child engagement and learning at all levels (Infants, toddlers, and preschool ages) and Family Involvement to support positive behaviors.  All teachers were recently issued a challenge related to Dr. Seuss’ birthday! Teaching staff worked hard to ensure all components of the challenge were met, including community and parent engagement. We are so happy to congratulate Ms. Valerie and Ms. Maria from Ambrose as the winner of the Early Head Start Dr. Seuss cha llenge. We are equally happy to congratulate Ms. Maria, Ms. Erika, and Ms. Reyna as the Head Start Dr. Seuss challenge winners!  CSB’s delegate agency, First Baptist Head Start held a Father/Daughter Dance on April 6, 2019 and had over 75 attendees. A gre at time was had by all and the men were very engaged.  The Economic Opportunity Council has held three of four public hearings as required by regulation to inform the Community Action Plan that is due every two years in June. Emerging needs include: homelessness and housing, affordable child care, positive relationships with police, and mental health services. The final public hearing will be held on May 2nd at Lao Family Services in San Pablo from 5:30 to 6:30. Participants are given a reusable bag filled with healthy snacks, a blanket, and a folder full of resources as a thank you for their service. I. Status Updates: a. Caseloads, workload (all programs)  Head Start enrollment: 100.4%  Early Head Start enrollment: 102.6%  Early Head Start Child Care Partnership enrollment: 100%  Early Head Start Child Care P artnership # 2 enrollment: 101.1%  Head Start Average Daily Attendance: 82.5%  Early Head Start Average Daily Attendance: 82%  Early Head Start Child Care Partnership Attendance: 85%  Stage 2: 475 families and 760 children  CAPP: 119 families and 201 children - In total: 594 families and 961 children - Incoming transfers from Stage 1: 29 families and 39 children  LIHEAP: 343 households have been assisted cc: Policy Council Chair Administration for Children and Families Program Specialist, Chris Pflaumer 3  Weatherization: 12 households have been assisted b. Staffing:  During the month of April, CSB hired five temporary Teacher Assistant Trainees, one temporary Associate Teacher, and one temporary Teacher in an effort to maintain a viable pull of substitutes needed for the classrooms  A current employee was promoted to Child Nutrition Worker II and CSB is now interviewing to backfill for the position as Child Nutrition Services Transporter. The Bureau has made a selection of one of the two temporary Transporter positions and in the process of completing hiring paperwork. CSB is still in search for a good fit to fill the second temporary Transporter position. Bureau is also expecting the open recruitment to open next week to fill a permanent position of Child Nutrition Food Operations Supervisor.  CSB promoted one employees f rom a temporary to a permanent Intermediate Clerk – Project positions.  The Bureau filled a Comprehensive Services Assistant Manager posi tion with an internal candidate, and is in the final stages of interviewing for the Comprehensive Services Manager (Health & Education) and Assistant Director, Comprehensive Service Manager (Health & Education), and multiple temporary and permanent Intermediate clerk positions.  Current Admin Analyst was promoted to ASA II in the Business Operations Unit. CSB is looking for fill another ASA II position within the Community Action unit. c. Union Issues: o During the month of April, CSB and Local 1 met for two Meet and Confer sessions to discuss the upcoming temporary Summer Layoff for Part Day/Part Year staff, and the Propos ed Program changes for Program Year 2019-2020. Additionally, the bureau and the union discussed the on boarding of Teacher Assistant Trainees. Agreements were reached in all discussed issues. II. Emerging Issues and Hot Topics:  There are no issues to report at this time. Total Remaining 75% DESCRIPTION YTD Actual Budget Budget % YTD a. PERSONNEL 248,862$ 297,675$ 48,813$ 84% b. FRINGE BENEFITS 148,666 206,426 57,760 72% c. TRAVEL - - - 0% d. EQUIPMENT - - - 0% e. SUPPLIES 8,154 6,900 (1,254) 118% f. CONTRACTUAL 248,052 467,260 219,208 53% g. CONSTRUCTION - 0% h. OTHER 48,103 74,699 26,596 64% I. TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES 701,836$ 1,052,960$ 351,124$ 67% j. INDIRECT COSTS 108,610 66,120 (42,490) 164% k. TOTAL-ALL BUDGET CATEGORIES 810,446$ 1,119,080$ 308,634$ 72% In-Kind (Non-Federal Share)209,815$ 279,770$ 69,955$ 75% CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - COMMUNITY SERVICES BUREAU EARLY HEAD START CHILD CARE PARTNERSHIP #1 BUDGET PERIOD JULY 2018 - JUNE 2019 AS OF MARCH 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Jul-18 Oct 18 Jan 19 thru thru thru Total YTD Total Remaining 75% Sep-18 Dec-18 Feb-19 Actual Budget Budget % YTD Expenditures a. Salaries & Wages (Object Class 6a) Permanent 1011 102,952 108,027 29,977 240,957 294,675 53,718 82% Temporary 1013 3,179 3,340 1,386 7,905 3,000 (4,905) 263% TOTAL PERSONNEL (6a)106,131 111,368 31,363 248,862 297,675 48,813 84% b. FRINGE BENEFITS (Object Class 6b) Fringe Benefits 61,423 66,114 21,128 148,666 206,426 57,760 72% TOTAL FRINGE (6b)61,423 66,114 21,128 148,666 206,426 57,760 72% e. SUPPLIES (Object Class 6e) 1. Office Supplies 1,043 73 165 1,280 500 (780) 256% 2. Child and Family Services Supplies (Incl.classroom Supplies)7,943 3,899 (7,575) 4,267 3,300 (967) 129% 3. Other Supplies Computer Supplies, Software Upgrades, Computer Replacement 48,886 (48,301) 1,425 2,009 1,000 (1,009) 201% Miscellaneous Supplies - 67 34 101 100 (1) 101% Household Supplies 1,765 28 (1,296) 497 2,000 1,503 25% TOTAL SUPPLIES (6e)59,636 (44,234) (7,248) 8,154 6,900 (1,254) 118% f. CONTRACTUAL (Object Class 6f) 1. Adm Svcs (e.g., Legal, Accounting, Temporary Contracts)278 112 1,207 1,597 8,000 6,403 20% 2. Other Contracts Contra Costa Child Care Council (52 slots x $500)19,000 46,000 104,000 169,000 312,000 143,000 54% Loss of Subsidy - 1,035 1,935 2,970 15,000 12,030 20% Children and Family Supplies (Diapers, etc)- - 4,485 4,485 12,260 7,775 37% First Baptist (20 slots x $500)10,000 30,000 30,000 70,000 120,000 50,000 58% TOTAL CONTRACTUAL (6f)29,278 77,147 141,626 248,052 467,260 219,208 53% h. OTHER (Object Class 6h) 1. Bldg Occupancy Costs/Rents & Leases 4,692 3,219 3,696 11,606 15,000 3,394 77% 2. Utilities, Telephone 3,476 5,108 2,428 11,012 18,000 6,988 61% 3. Bldg. Maintenance/Repair and Other Occupancy 147 435 585 1,167 2,000 833 58% 4. Local Travel (54.5 cents per mile effective 1/1/2018)91 755 9 855 2,800 1,945 31% 5. Parent Services - Parent Activities (Sites, PC, BOS luncheon) & Appreciation - - - - 200 200 0% 6. Accounting & Legal Services - Legal (County Counsel)- - - - 500 500 0% Auditor Controllers - - - - 1,000 1,000 0% Data Processing/Other Services & Supplies 279 418 418 1,115 1,000 (115) 112% 7. Publications/Advertising/Printing Recruitment Advertising (Newspaper, Brochures)- - - - 100 100 0% 8. Training or Staff Development - Staff Trainings/Dev. Conf. Registrations/Memberships - PA11 9,224 2,162 8,199 19,585 25,907 6,322 76% 9. Other Vehicle Operating/Maintenance & Repair - - - - 1,000 1,000 0% Equipment Maintenance Repair & Rental - 393 492 885 3,000 2,115 29% Other Operating Expenses (CSD Admin/Facs Mgt. Alloc-1401)571 (74) 1,380 1,877 4,192 2,315 45% h. OTHER (6h)18,480 12,417 17,206 48,103 74,699 26,596 64% I. TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES (6a-6h)274,948 222,812 204,076 701,836 1,052,960 351,124 67% j. INDIRECT COSTS 22,015 45,441 41,155 108,610 66,120 (42,490) 164% k. TOTALS - ALL BUDGET CATEGORIES 296,963 268,253 245,230 810,446 1,119,080 308,634 72% Non-federal Match In-Kind 63,380 67,063 79,372 209,815 279,770 69,955 75% CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - COMMUNITY SERVICES BUREAU EARLY HEAD START CHILD CARE PARTNERSHIP #1 BUDGET PERIOD JULY 2018 - JUNE 2019 AS OF MARCH 2019 March Total Remaining 25% DESCRIPTION YTD Actual Budget Budget %YTD a. PERSONNEL 1,100,743$ 4,302,643$ 3,201,900$ 26% b. FRINGE BENEFITS 708,280 2,746,259 2,037,979 26% d. EQUIPMENT - 24,000 24,000 0% e. SUPPLIES 58,644 235,500 176,856 25% f. CONTRACTUAL 104,188 2,650,628 2,546,440 4% g. CONSTRUCTION - - - 0% h. OTHER 362,682 5,761,049 5,398,367 6% I. TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES 2,334,537$ 15,720,079$ 13,385,542$ 15% j. INDIRECT COSTS 244,021 903,555 659,534 27% k. TOTAL-ALL BUDGET CATEGORIES 2,578,558$ 16,623,634$ 14,045,076$ 16% In-Kind (Non-Federal Share)644,639$ 4,155,909$ 3,511,269$ 16% CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - COMMUNITY SERVICES BUREAU HEAD START PROGRAM BUDGET PERIOD JANUARY - DECEMBER 2019 AS OF MARCH 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Actual Actual Actual Total YTD Total Remaining 25% Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Actual Budget Budget % YTD a. Salaries & Wages (Object Class 6a) Permanent 1011 307,967 351,250 334,447 993,664 3,712,553 2,718,889 27% Temporary 1013 34,684 35,980 36,415 107,079 590,090 483,011 18% a. PERSONNEL (Object class 6a)342,651 387,230 370,862 1,100,743 4,302,643 3,201,900 26% b. FRINGE (Object Class 6b)216,445 249,147 242,688 708,280 2,746,259 2,037,979 26% d. EQUIPMENT (Object Class 6d)- - - - 24,000 24,000 - e. SUPPLIES (Object Class 6e)1. Office Supplies 10,337 6,259 5,085 21,681 85,000 63,319 26%2. Child and Family Services Supplies (Includesclassroom Supplies)10,959 5,111 1,085 17,155 60,000 42,845 29%4. Other Supplies Health and Safety Supplies - - - - 1,000 1,000 0% Computer Supplies, Software Upgrades, Computer Replacement - - 16,654 16,654 60,000 43,346 28% Health/Safety Supplies - - - - 7,000 7,000 0% Mental helath/Diasabilities Supplies - - - - 1,000 1,000 Miscellaneous Supplies - 341 2,777 3,118 12,000 8,882 26% Emergency Supplies - - - - 1,000 1,000 0% Employee Morale - 36 - 36 2,500 2,464 1% Household Supplies - - - - 6,000 6,000 0% TOTAL SUPPLIES (6e)21,296 11,748 25,600 58,644 235,500 176,856 25% f. CONTRACTUAL (Object Class 6f)1. Adm Svcs (e.g., Legal, Accounting, Temporary Contracts)- 16,500 11,284 27,784 95,000 67,216 29% Estimated Medical Revenue from Medi-Cal (Org 1432 - credit)- - - - (630,000) (630,000) 0% Health Consultant 5,440 6,400 4,760 16,600 55,000 38,400 30%5. Training & Technical Assistance - PA11 Interaction - - - - 5,000 5,000 0% Diane Godard ($50,000/2)- - 5,275 5,275 9,000 3,725 59% Josephine Lee ($35,000/2)- - - - 5,000 5,000 0% Susan Cooke ($60,000/2)- - - - 10,000 10,000 0%7. Delegate Agency Costs First Baptist Church Head Start PA22 - - - - 2,156,616 2,156,616 0% First Baptist Church Head Start PA20 - - - - 8,000 8,000 0%8. Other Contracts FB-Fairgrounds Partnership (Wrap)- 6,154 - 6,154 74,212 68,058 8% FB-Fairgrounds Partnership - 13,500 13,275 26,775 163,600 136,825 16% FB-E. Leland/Mercy Housing Partnership - 1,800 1,800 3,600 20,000 16,400 18% Martinez ECC (18 HS slots x $225/mo x 12/mo)- 9,000 9,000 18,000 108,000 90,000 17% YMCA of the East Bay (20 HS slots x $225/mo x 12/mo) - - - - 571,200 571,200 0% f. CONTRACTUAL (Object Class 6f)5,440 53,353 45,394 104,188 2,650,628 2,546,440 4% h. OTHER (Object Class 6h) 2. Bldg Occupancy Costs/Rents & Leases 8,388 48,676 40,035 97,099 336,000 238,901 29% 4. Utilities, Telephone 5,957 4,242 9,557 19,755 274,000 254,245 7% 5. Building and Child Liability Insurance - - - - 3,000 3,000 0% 6. Bldg. Maintenance/Repair and Other Occupancy 2,584 6,263 5,542 14,389 67,000 52,611 21% 8. Local Travel (55.5 cents per mile effective 1/1/2012)352 2,976 4,568 7,895 62,000 54,105 13% 9. Nutrition Services Child Nutrition Costs - 31,266 34,322 65,588 272,000 206,412 24% (CCFP & USDA Reimbursements)- - - - (85,000) (85,000) 0%13. Parent Services Parent Conference Registration - PA11 - - - - 10,000 10,000 0% Parent Resources (Parenting Books, Videos, etc.) - PA11 - - 366 366 1,000 634 37% PC Orientation, Trainings, Materials & Translation - PA11 - 306 - 306 7,600 7,294 4% Policy Council Activities - - 637 637 2,000 1,363 32% Male Involvement Activities - - - - 500 500 0% Parent Activities (Sites, PC, BOS luncheon) & Appreciation - - - - 7,000 7,000 0% Child Care/Mileage Reimbursement - - (94) (94) 7,500 7,594 -1%14. Accounting & Legal Services Auditor Controllers - 893 - 893 5,000 4,107 18% Data Processing/Other Services & Supplies - 1,544 1,544 3,088 16,500 13,412 19%15. Publications/Advertising/Printing - - - Outreach/Printing - - - - 100 100 0% Recruitment Advertising (Newspaper, Brochures)- - - - 1,400 1,400 0%16. Training or Staff Development Agency Memberships (WIPFLI, Meeting Fees, NHSA, NAEYC, etc.)7,955 4,466 957 13,378 10,000 (3,378) 134% Staff Trainings/Dev. Conf. Registrations/Memberships - PA11 22,274 501 12,754 35,529 52,327 16,798 68% Mental Health, Disabilities, Health and Safety Training - - - - 31,959 31,959 0% Family, Community and Parent Involvement - - - - 47,458 47,458 0%17. Other Site Security Guards - 1,056 2,559 3,616 22,000 18,384 16% Dental/Medical Services - - - - 2,000 2,000 0% Vehicle Operating/Maintenance & Repair - 11,778 21,118 32,896 170,000 137,104 19% Equipment Maintenance Repair & Rental 3,452 15,778 28,527 47,756 280,000 232,244 17% Dept. of Health and Human Services-data Base (CORD)- 835 835 1,669 9,500 7,831 18% Field Trips - - - - 30,000 30,000 0% Other Operating Expenses (Facs Admin/Other admin)- 9,558 8,358 17,915 168,205 150,290 11% Other Departmental Expenses - - - - 3,950,000 3,950,000 0% h. OTHER (6h)50,961 140,138 171,583 362,682 5,761,049 5,398,367 6% I. TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES (6a-6h)636,793 841,616 856,128 2,334,537 15,720,079 13,385,542 15% j. INDIRECT COSTS - 107,368 136,652 244,021 903,555 659,534 27% k. TOTALS (ALL BUDGET CATEGORIES)636,793 948,984 992,780 2,578,558 16,623,634 14,045,076 16% Non-Federal Share (In-kind)159,198 237,246 248,195 644,639 4,155,909 3,511,269 16% CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - COMMUNITY SERVICES BUREAU HEAD START PROGRAM BUDGET PERIOD JANUARY - DECEMBER 2019 AS OF MARCH 2019 March Total Remaining 25% DESCRIPTION YTD Actual Budget Budget % YTD a. PERSONNEL 58,404$ 241,295$ 182,891$ 24% b. FRINGE BENEFITS 36,022 136,908 100,886 26% d. EQUIPMENT - - - 0% e. SUPPLIES 828 17,300 16,472 5% f. CONTRACTUAL 92,886 1,284,300 1,191,414 7% g. CONSTRUCTION - - - 0% h. OTHER 359,661 1,897,915 1,538,254 19% I. TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES 547,801$ 3,577,718$ 3,029,917$ 15% j. INDIRECT COSTS 17,714 50,672 32,958 35% k. TOTAL-ALL BUDGET CATEGORIES 565,516$ 3,628,390$ 3,062,874$ 16% In-Kind (Non-Federal Share)141,379$ 907,098$ 765,719$ 16% CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - COMMUNITY SERVICES BUREAU EARLY HEAD START PROGRAM BUDGET PERIOD JANUARY - DECEMBER 2019 AS OF MARCH 2019 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Actual Actual Actual Total YTD Total Remaining 25% Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Actual Budget Budget % YTD Expenditures a. Salaries & Wages (Object Class 6a) Permanent 1011 14,459 18,876 15,853 49,188 180,188 131,000 27% Temporary 1013 3,579 3,487 2,151 9,217 61,107 51,890 15% a. PERSONNEL (Object class 6a)18,038 22,363 18,004 58,404 241,295 182,891 24% b. FRINGE (Object Class 6b)9,330 13,708 12,984 36,022 136,908 100,886 26% d. EQUIPMENT (Object Class 6d)- - - - - - e. SUPPLIES (Object Class 6e)1. Office Supplies 56 97 661 815 5,500 4,685 15%2. Child and Family Serv. Supplies/classroom Supplies - - - - 4,000 4,000 0%4. Other Supplies - - - - - Computer Supplies, Software Upgrades, Comp Replacemnt- - - - 5,000 5,000 0% Health/Safety Supplies - - - - 700 700 0% Miscellaneous Supplies - 14 - 14 1,100 1,086 1% Employee Morale - - - - 1,000 1,000 e. SUPPLIES (Object Class 6e)56 111 661 828 17,300 16,472 5% f. CONTRACTUAL (Object Class 6f)2. Health/Disabilities Services - - - - - Health Consultant 960 - 2,040 3,000 7,800 4,800 38% Other Health/Dental Services Costs - - - - - - 5. Training & Technical Assistance - PA11 - Interaction - - - - 5,500 5,500 0% Diane Godard - - - - 7,500 7,500 0% Josephine Lee ($35,000/2)- 1,590 1,296 2,886 5,000 2,114 58% Susan Cooke ($60,000/2)- - - - 6,500 6,500 0%8. Other Contracts FB-Fairgrounds Partnership - 13,000 7,000 20,000 72,000 52,000 28% FB-E. Leland/Mercy Housing Partnership - 8,000 8,000 16,000 180,000 164,000 9% Apiranet - - - - 708,000 708,000 0% Crossroads - 14,000 14,000 28,000 154,000 126,000 18% Martinez ECC - 11,500 11,500 23,000 138,000 115,000 17% f. CONTRACTUAL (Object Class 6f)960 48,090 43,836 92,886 1,284,300 1,191,414 7% h. OTHER (Object Class 6h) 2. Bldg Occupancy Costs/Rents & Leases - 91 49 140 1,800 1,660 8% (Rents & Leases/Other Income)- - - - - - 4. Utilities, Telephone - 24 370 393 2,700 2,307 15% 5. Building and Child Liability Insurance - - - - - - 6. Bldg. Maintenance/Repair and Other Occupancy - 147 196 342 2,300 1,958 15% 8. Local Travel (55.5 cents per mile)- 248 377 624 4,100 3,476 15% 9. Nutrition Services - - - - - Child Nutrition Costs - - - - 300 300 0% (CCFP & USDA Reimbursements)- - - - - - 13. Parent Services Parent Conference Registration - PA11 - - - - 4,000 4,000 0% PC Orientation, Trainings, Materials & Translation - PA11 - - - - 4,000 4,000 0% Policy Council Activities - - - - 100 100 0% Parent Activities (Sites, PC, BOS luncheon) & Appreciation1,173 - - 1,173 1,900 727 62% Child Care/Mileage Reimbursement - - - - 100 100 0%14. Accounting & Legal Services Auditor Controllers - - - - 500 500 0% Data Processing/Other Services & Supplies - 409 409 817 3,000 2,183 27%15. Publications/Advertising/Printing Recruitment Advertising (Newspaper, Brochures)- - - - 100 100 16. Training or Staff Development Agency Memberships (WIPFLI, Meeting Fees, NHSA, NAEYC)- 26 - 26 2,200 2,174 1% Staff Trainings/Dev. Conf. Registrations/Memberships - PA11495 3,854 4,477 8,826 48,244 39,418 18%17. Other Vehicle Operating/Maintenance & Repair - 651 1,504 2,155 5,000 2,845 43% Equipment Maintenance Repair & Rental - 1,471 251 1,722 4,000 2,278 43% Dept. of Health and Human Services-data Base (CORD)- - - - 1,000 1,000 Other Operating Expenses (Facs Admin/Other admin)- 141 143 284 12,000 11,716 2% Other Departmental Expenses - 180,636 162,522 343,158 1,800,571 1,457,413 h. OTHER (6h)1,668 187,697 170,296 359,661 1,897,915 1,538,254 19% I. TOTAL DIRECT CHARGES (6a-6h)30,053 271,968 245,781 547,801 3,577,718 3,029,917 15% j. INDIRECT COSTS - 7,441 10,273 17,714 50,672 32,958 35% k. TOTALS - ALL BUDGET CATEGORIES 30,053 279,409 256,054 565,516 3,628,390 3,062,874 16% Non-Federal Match (In-Kind)7,513 69,852 64,013 141,379 907,098 765,719 16% CONTRA COSTA COUNTY - COMMUNITY SERVICES BUREAU EARLY HEAD START PROGRAM BUDGET PERIOD JANUARY - DECEMBER 2019 AS OF MARCH 2019 A - 5 Authorized Users C. Rand, Bureau Dir xxxx8798 Month: March 2018 K. Mason, Div Mgr xxxx2364 C. Reich, Div Mgr xxxx4959 Credit Card:Visa/U.S. Bank S. Kim, Sr. Bus. Systems Analyst xxxx1907 C. Johnson, AD xxxx0220 J. Rowley, AD xxxx2391 P. Arrington, AD xxxx3838 I. Renggenathen, AD xxxx0494 R. Radeva, PSA III xxxx1899 Corporate Acct. Number xxxx5045 Acct. code Stat. Date Card Account # Amount Program Purpose/Description 2100 03/22/18 xxxx1907 308.33 EHS-Child Care Partnership Office Exp 2100 03/22/18 xxxx1907 29.55 HS Basic Grant Office Exp 2100 03/22/18 xxxx1907 317.86 Indirect Admin Costs Office Exp 2100 03/22/18 xxxx8798 (33.17) HS Basic Grant Office Exp 2100 03/22/18 xxxx8798 121.91 HS Basic Grant Office Exp 744.48 2102 03/22/18 xxxx4959 81.46 HS Basic Grant Books, Periodicals 2102 03/22/18 xxxx4959 4,286.52 EHS Basis Grant Books, Periodicals 2102 03/22/18 xxxx4959 256.43 EHS-Child Care Partnership #2 Books, Periodicals 2102 03/22/18 xxxx2364 421.80 HS Basic Grant Books, Periodicals 5,046.21 2131 03/22/18 xxxx0494 1,037.00 Bayo Vista Site Costs Minor Furniture/Equipment 2131 03/22/18 xxxx0494 110.98 Las Deltas Site Costs Minor Furniture/Equipment 1,147.98 2303 03/22/18 xxxx1907 523.45 CSD Liheap PGE Assistance Other Travel Employees 2303 03/22/18 xxxx2364 (399.04) HS Basic Grant Other Travel Employees 124.41 2467 03/22/18 xxxx4959 30.00 HS Basic Grant Training & Registration 2467 03/22/18 xxxx4959 18.00 EHS-Child Care Partnership #2 Training & Registration 2467 03/22/18 xxxx4959 12.00 EHS-Child Care Partnership Training & Registration 2467 03/22/18 xxxx4959 35.00 EHS Basis Grant Training & Registration 2467 03/22/18 xxxx1907 50.00 Child Care Svs Program Training & Registration 2467 03/22/18 xxxx1907 50.00 HS Basic Grant Training & Registration 2467 03/22/18 xxxx8798 2,100.00 HS Basic Grant Training & Registration 2467 03/22/18 xxxx3838 100.00 HS Admin Charges Training & Registration 2467 03/22/18 xxxx1899 1,395.00 HS Basic Grant Training & Registration 2467 03/22/18 xxxx1899 1,390.00 EHS T & TA Training & Registration 2467 03/22/18 xxxx1899 (25.00) GM III CS Training & Registration 2467 03/22/18 xxxx1899 (15.00) HS Basic Grant Training & Registration 2467 03/22/18 xxxx2391 640.00 HS Basic Grant Training & Registration 5,780.00 2477 03/22/18 xxxx8798 620.76 EHS-Child Care Partnership #2 Educational Supplies 2477 03/22/18 xxxx3838 2,285.00 HS Parent Services Educational Supplies 2477 03/22/18 xxxx3838 217.28 HS Basic Grant Educational Supplies 2477 03/22/18 xxxx2391 134.10 HS Basic Grant Educational Supplies 3,257.14 2479 03/22/18 xxxx1899 615.00 Indirect Admin Costs Other Special Dpmtal Exp 615.00 2490 03/22/18 xxxx2364 254.97 HS Basic Grant Misc Services/Supplies 2490 03/22/18 xxxx0494 83.01 Brookside Site Costs Misc Services/Supplies 2490 03/22/18 xxxx0494 67.43 Verde Site Costs Misc Services/Supplies 2490 03/22/18 xxxx0220 550.00 Los Arboles Site Costs Misc Services/Supplies 2490 03/22/18 xxxx0220 365.85 HS Basic Grant Misc Services/Supplies 1,321.26 Total 18,036.48 COMMUNITY SERVICES BUREAU SUMMARY CREDIT CARD EXPENDITURE Agency: Community Services Bureau 2019 Month covered February Approved sites operated this month 14 Number of days meals served this month 19 Average daily participation 687 Child Care Center Meals Served: Breakfast 10,280 Lunch 13,051 Supplements 8,983 Total Number of Meals Served 32,314 fldr/fn:2019 CAO Monthly Reports EMPLOYMENT & HUMAN SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY SERVICES BUREAU CHILD NUTRITION FOOD SERVICES CHILD and ADULT CARE FOOD PROGRAM MEALS SERVED FY 2018-2019 CAO Monthly Report CSBG and Weatherization Programs Year-to-Date Expenditures As of March 31, 2016 1.2015 LIHEAP WXContract # 15B-3005Term: Jan. 1, 2015 - Sept. 30, 2016Amount: WX $ 1,204,143 Total Contract 1,204,143$ Expenditures (991,608) Balance 212,535$ Expended 82% 2.2015 LIHEAP ECIP/EHA 16Contract # 15B-3005Term: Jan. 1, 2015 - Sept. 30, 2016Amount: EHA 16 $ 1,018,161 Total Contract 1,018,161$ Expenditures (1,003,806) Balance 14,355$ Expended 99% 3.2015 LIWP (LOW INCOME WX)Contract # 15K-6003Term: Jan 1, 2015 - Jan 31, 2017Amount: $ 537,538 Total Contract 537,538$ Expenditures (169,290) Balance 368,248$ Expended 31% 4.2016 COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT (CSBG)Contract # 16F-5007Term: Jan. 1, 2016 - December 31, 2016Amount: $ 797,709 Total Contract 797,709$ Expenditures (65,439) Balance 732,270$ Expended 8% fldr/fn:CAO Monthly Reports/WX YTD Exp-CAO Mo Rprt 3-2016 April 2019 – COMMUNITY SERVICES BUREAU PRESCHOOL MENU MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY 1 BREAKFAST ½ c. FRESH APPLE ⅓ c. KIX CEREAL LUNCH 1 ¼ c. Rice Vegetable Casserole (brown rice, shredded cheese, kale, onion, mushroom) ¼ c. FRESH KIWI PM SNACK 1 pkg. GOLDFISH CRACKERS ½ c. 1% LOW-FAT MILK 2 BREAKFAST ½ c. FRESH TANGERINE ⅓ c. CORN CHEX CEREAL LUNCH ⅔ c.*Ground Turkey & Spanish Rice (ground turkey, tomatoes, green pepper, onion, & brown rice) ¼ c. FRESH PEAR PM SNACK ¼ c. LOW-FAT YOGURT ½ c. PINEAPPLE TIBITS 3 BREAKFAST ½ c. MANGO CHUNKS ½ ea. WHOLE WHEAT BAGEL/CREAM CHEESE LUNCH ¾ c.*Beef Vegetable Stew (beef cubes, sliced carrots, green peas, potatoes) ¼ c. FRESH ORANGE ½ ea. WHOLE WHEAT ROLL PM SNACK 6 ea. WHOLE CORN TORTILLA CHIPS/SALSA ½ c. 1% LOW-FAT MILK 4 BREAKFAST 1 ea. FRESH BANANA ¼ c. COOKED CINNAMON OATMEAL & RAISINS LUNCH ⅜ c. Bean Burrito ¼ c. SHREDDED LETTUCE & DICED TOMATOES 1 oz. SHREDDED CHEESE 1 ea. WHOLE WHEAT TORTILLA PM SNACK 1 tbsp. SUNBUTTER 2 pkgs. RITZ CRACKERS 5 BREAKFAST ½ c. FRESH ORANGE ⅓ c. RICE CHEX CEREAL LUNCH 1½ oz. Baked Chicken ¼ c. COLESLAW ¼ c. FRESH STRAWBERRIES ½ ea. WHOLE WHEAT ROLL PM SNACK ⅓ c. LETS GO FISHING TRAIL MIX (corn chex, pretzels, fish & cheese crackers) ½ c. 1% LOW-FAT MILK 8 Week SUPERSTAR BREAKFAST ½ c. FRESH APPLE ¼ c. COUSCOUS WITH CINNAMON LUNCH 1 c. Mac & Cheese ¼ c. BROCCOLI FLORETS ¼ c. FRESH PEAR PM SNACK - Make Your Own Trail Mix ⅓ c. CEREAL ½ c. 1% LOW-FAT MILK 9 Of BREAKFAST 1 ea. FRESH BANANA ⅓ c. BRAN CEREAL LUNCH TACO TUESDAY 1 oz. Ground Turkey ½ oz. Cheese ¼ c. LETTUCE & TOMATOES ¼ c. FRESH KIWI 2 ea. WHOLE CORN MINI TORTILLAS PM SNACK – Make A Bug 1 ea. STRING CHEESE ½ c. FRUIT 10 The BREAKFAST – STRAWBERRY JUMPIN’ FRENCH TOAST ½ c. FRESH STRAWBERRIES 1 serv. FRENCH TOAST LUNCH ½ c. *Chicken Fajita (diced chicken, bell pepper, onion) ¼ c. FRESH APPLE ¼ c. BROWN RICE PM SNACK - Make An Animal 1 tbsp. SUNBUTTER ½ c. FRUIT 11 Young BREAKFAST ½ c. FRESH ORANGE ½ ea. WHOLE WHEAT BAGEL/CREAM CHEESE LUNCH 1 ea.*Mexican Pizza (refried beans, tomato paste, chunky salsa) ½ oz. SHREDDED MOZZARELLA CHEESE ¼ c. FRESH PEAR 1 ea. WHOLE WHEAT TORTILLA PM SNACK - Make A Flower 2 pkgs. RITZ CRACKERS ½ c. FRUIT 12 Child BANANA – RAMA BREAKFAST 1 ea. FRESH BANANA ½ ea. ENGLISH MUFFIN LUNCH ¾ c. *Ground Turkey & Beef Stroganoff (ground beef, ground turkey, carrots, bell pepper, & whole wheat pasta) ¼ c. FRESH STRAWBERRIES ¼ c. WHOLE WHEAT PASTA PM SNACK - Make A Face 1 sl. WHOLE WHEAT BREAD ½ c. FRUIT 15 BREAKFAST ½ c. FRESH PEAR ⅓ c. BRAN CEREAL LUNCH ¾ c. *Chili Sans Carne (beans) 1 oz. SHREDDED CHEESE ¼ c. FRESH TANGERINE 2 pkgs. WHEATWORTH CRACKERS PM SNACK ½ c. FRESH APPLE 1 ea. CHEDDAR CHEESE STICK 16 BREAKFAST ½ c. FRESH ORANGE ⅓ c. RICE CHEX CEREAL LUNCH ⅓ c. Sloppy Joe Mix (ground turkey) ¼ c. BROCCOLI SLAW ¼ c. FRESH APPLE SLICES ½ ea. WHOLE WHEAT HAMBURGER BUN PM SNACK 1 pkg. ANIMAL CRACKERS ½ c. 1% LOW-FAT MILK 17 BREAKFAST 1 ea. FRESH BANANA ⅓ c. KIX CEREAL LUNCH ½ c. Red Pozole Soup (diced chicken, tomato paste, hominy) ¼ c. SHREDDED CABBAGE & CILANTRO ¼ c. MANGO CHUNKS 6 ea. WHOLE CORN TORTILLA CHIPS PM SNACK 1 ea. SOFT PRETZEL STICK ½ c. CUCUMBER & CARROT STICKS/RANCH DRESSING 18 BREAKFAST ½ c. FRESH ORANGE ½ sl. WHOLE WHEAT CINNAMON BREAD LUNCH ⅜ c. Gumbo & Rice ¼ c. COLESLAW ¼ c. FRESH PEAR PM SNACK ½ c. PINEAPPLE TIDBITS ⅛ c. COTTAGE CHEESE 19 BREAKFAST 1 ea. FRESH BANANA ⅓ c. CHEERIOS LUNCH ½ c. Chicken Salad ¼ c. MIXED GREENS/ITALIAN DRESSING ¼ c. FRESH STRAWBERRIES ½ ea. WHOLE WHEAT PITA BREAD PM SNACK ½ c. FRESH APPLE 1 tbsp. SUNBUTTER 22 BREAKFAST ½ c. FRESH ORANGE ⅓ c. RICE CHEX CEREAL LUNCH ½ c. Chickpeas & Tomatoes ¼ c. FRESH APPLE ½ ea. WHOLE WHEAT ROLL PM SNACK 1 tbsp. SUNBUTTER 2 pkgs. RITZ CRACKERS 23 BREAKFAST ½ c. FRESH KIWI ⅓ c. BRAN CEREAL LUNCH ⅓ c. Filipino Adobo (beef stew meat, soy sauce, vinegar) ¼ c. FRESH BROCCOLI FLORETS/RANCH DRESSING ¼ c. FRESH TANGERINE ¼ c. BROWN RICE PM SNACK ½ c. FRUIT SALSA (mandarin oranges, pineapple chunks, onions, & green bell peppers) 6 ea. WHOLE CORN TORTILLA CHIPS 24 BREAKFAST ½ C. PINEAPPLE TIDBITS ½ ea. WHOLE WHEAT BAGEL/CREAM CHEESE LUNCH 1 serv. Chicken Chilaquiles with WHOLE GRAIN CORN TORTILLA CHIPS ¼ c. GREEN SALAD/ITALIAN DRESSING ¼ c. FRESH PEAR PM SNACK 1 ea. FRESH BANANA 1 tbsp. SUNBUTTER 25 BREAKFAST ½ c. MANGO CHUNKS ⅓ c. CORN CHEX CEREAL LUNCH ¾ c. *Arroz Con Queso (pinto beans, brown rice, shredded cheese, tomatoes, green chiles, onions) ¼ c. FRESH STRAWBERRIES PM SNACK ½ c. CELERY STICKS/RANCH DRESSING 6 ea. WHEAT THIN CRACKERS 26 BREAKFAST 1 ea. FRESH BANANA ⅓ c. CHEERIOS LUNCH ¾ c.*Greek Chicken Salad (diced chicken, cucumbers, tomatoes & olives) WITH FETA CHEESE DRESSING ¼ c. FRESH APPLE ½ ea. WHOLE WHEAT PITA BREAD PM SNACK 1 pkg. ANIMAL CRACKERS ½ c. 1% LOW-FAT MILK 29 BREAKFAST ½ c. FRESH APPLE ⅓ c. CORNFLAKES LUNCH ⅜ c. Baja Bean Taco (kidney beans, pinto beans & salsa) 1 oz. SHREDDED CHEESE ¼ c. FRESH KIWI 1 ea. WHOLE CORN TORTILLA PM SNACK ½ c. DICED PEACHES 1 ea. MOZZARELLA CHEESE STICK 30 BREAKFAST ½ c. FRESH STRAWBERRIES 1 ea. HARD BOILED EGG LUNCH ¾ c. *Chicken Ala King ¼ c. FRESH TANGERINE ¼ c. BROWN RICE PM SNACK 1 pkg. ANIMAL CRACKERS ½ c. 1% LOW-FAT MILK ALL BREAKFAST & LUNCH SERVED WITH 1% LOW-FAT MILK *Indicates vegetable included in main dish WATER IS OFFERED THROUGHOUT THE DAY Week Of The Young Child April 8th – 12th RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE 2018 Annual Report submitted by the Mental Health Commission, as recommended by the County Administrator. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: On December 13, 2011, the Board of Supervisors adopted Resolution No. 2011/497, which requires that each regular and ongoing board, commission, or committee annually report to the Board of Supervisors on its activities, accomplishments, membership attendance, required training/certification, and proposed work plan or objectives for the following year. The attached report fulfills this requirement for the Mental Health Commission. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sarah Kennard, (925) 957-2619 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C.160 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:2018 Annual Report from Board Advisory Body - Mental Health Commission ATTACHMENTS 2018 Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2 Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2018 Submitted by Chair, Barbara Serwin, 6 May 2018 Theme The theme of 2018 was integration and collaboration between the Mental Health Commission (MHC) and Behavioral Health Services (BHS), following two years of intensive conflict, negotiation and problem solving. From the MHC perspective, this theme has ultimately led to a much closer-knit and trusting working relationship, while still respecting the MHC’s role as a mandatory and objective observer of Contra Costa County’s system of care and advisor to the Board of Supervisors (BOS) on matters related to mental health in our county. Below are key examples of the current integrations between the MHC and BHS: • The collaborative MHC retreat (see description below) • Monthly report outs at Commission meetings by Acting Behavioral Health Services Director Dr. Mathew White • Steady attendance by Anna Roth, Director of Health Services and/or her team members, Erika Jenssen and Duffy Newman • Monthly meetings between the MHC Chair and Vice Chair and the BHS Director and leadership team • Assignment of BHS resources one hundred percent committed to supporting the MHC in the way of our new Executive Assistant, Sarah Kennard, and the new role of MHC Liaison, filled by Warren Hayes, who is part of the BHS Leadership Team and provides a deep history and knowledge of current BHS and MHSA activities. 2018 MHC Retreat The 2018 MHC retreat introduced a new concept of a collaborative and interactive learning event based on close involvement of BHS and Health Services. The theme of the retreat was “Communication, Collaboration, and Trust”. It had the goal of integrating Behavioral Health Services staff with the Commission and developing more trust and more understanding of each other’s positions and roles and responsibilities. The event was attended by members of the Health Services leadership team and the BHS leadership team and a broad range of BHS staff. Responded to BOS Family and Human Services (FHS) Committee Referrals 115 and 116 Reports and Grand Jury Report No. 1703 At the end of 2017 the Commission reported to the BOS FHS Committee regarding responses to the MHC White Paper and BHS Grand Jury Report response. This discussion resulted in the FHS Committee requesting an ongoing six-month updates from BHS services on the issues put forth in the White Paper and Grand Jury Report, with Supervisors John Gioia from District I and Supervisor Candace Andersen from District II. Between the end of 2017 and April 2018, the MHC and BHS engaged in ongoing working meetings regarding problem-solving potential solutions for the relating to the challenges that the BHS was facing. In late Spring of 2018, the MHC and BHS gave a joint update to the FHS Committee that reported on our further developing collaborative working relationship, progress made by BHS and plans for further 3 improvements. The report ended with the joint recommendation that updates to the BOS FHS Committee were no longer necessary from the BHS point-of-view, pending consistent, ongoing internal dialog between the MHC and BHS, which the FHS Committee accepted. Continued Advocacy for Increase Number of Psychiatrists and Decreased Wait Times Doug Dunn- stated that the County has placed $300,000 to assist clinicians and psychiatrists with their student loans, to attract more qualified staff. Upon employment, clinicians and psychiatrists can apply for the “student loan forgiveness program” provided by the County to assist in paying their educational debt. Suggest that maybe executive staff can assist more in recruiting graduates into employment with the county. West County Mental Health Detention Expansion Updates from Assistant Sheriff Schuler and Captain Tom Chalk Discussion of issues, e.g. at Erika’s detention event Advocating For a Mandatory PES Evaluation in Cases of Violent Consumer Behavior Throughout the year, the Commission advocated for requiring a medical evaluation at PES of consumers who pose harm (immediate or potential) to themselves or others at the scene of a call for an involuntary hospitalization (5150). We sought to find the best avenue to influence the policy of the Sheriff’s department and the countywide police force towards this policy. Our current strategy is to work with the director of the county Crisis Intervention Team, Chief Brian Bonthron, to potentially train officers on this approach. Participation in Rapid Improvements Events One of the most exciting efforts that the MHC learned from and participated in was the Rapid Improvement Events moderated by Erika Jenssen, Assistant to Health Services Director of Contra Costa County and Chris Farnitano, Health Officer of the county. The MHC gained a general overview of the value and workings of RIE’s and participated as part of the leadership that gave feedback to the RIE teams each day of their week-long events and attended some of the tours of facilities related to the RIE’s. The RIE’s that the MHC participated in were: • The Value Stream Mapping process for Detention Mental Health • Detention RIE event • Value Stream Map for BHS • Redesigning the First Visit RIE • Standardizing Screening and Scheduling RIE 4 Varied Discussion Topics and Updates • ECAMH registered nurses addressed Patient Safety concerns and the lack of protection for mental health professionals with respect to the current mental health crisis in our community, Therese Becker, AMFT • Community Connect Program which aims to connect consumers and families to community services, Emily Parmenter, Program Manager • Discussed BHS efforts relating to housing for the seriously mentally ill, led by Dr. Jan Cobaleda-Kegler, Program Chief for Adult and Older Adult Services • Discussed Network Adequacy Standards, which is a review of a mandatory analysis of the distribution of mental health services in our system of are compared to the metrics of comparably-sized counties in California, Mathew Luu, Deputy Director of BHS • Learned more about the new BHS Adult Mobile Crisis Response Team, which aims to reduce suicides and PES hospitalizations, de-escalate crises, and initiate 5150s as needed, Mobile Crisis Team • Learned more about the Child and Youth Mobile Response Team, which aims to minimize police involvement or hospitalization during incidents of crisis, Seneca Family of Agencies • Updated on the San Pablo building for the West County clinic, by Contra Costa Health Services Planning and Evaluation Staff, West County Behavioral Health Center Advocacy for Children’s Residential and Transitional Age Youth (TAY) Residential Programs The Commission continued to consistently advocate for children’s and TAY residential programs. We discussed a new BHS proposal for a children’s program with Warren Hayes (now on the back burner for good reasons) and the new TAY program moving forward in the Oak Grove county property. Review of the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Activities and Budget The MHC reviewed the MHSA activities and budget on multiple occasions as presented by Warren Hayes, MHSA Program Manager. In addition to hearing multiple updates, the Commission hosted the Public Hearing on the MHSA Three Year Plan update. Change in By-laws The Commission updated its bylaw regarding attendance and the formation of a quorum. At the committee level we now permit the Chair or Vice Chair to represent absent Commissioners, thereby permitting a quorum to be more easily formed. This in turn increased the capacity of work by the Committees. Implemented Motion Track The Commission implemented a “Motion Tracker” to record in one place motions made at the Commission and Committee levels, thereby, at a glance being able to see which motions have been executed, which haven’t, who is responsible for leading the efforts of incomplete motions, etc. This tool enables the Commission to track on progress and move along completion of its commitments. 5 Formed Ad Hoc Data Committee The Commission formed an ad hoc Data Committee to illicit the informational needs of the Commission. This was in response to efforts by BHS to provide standardized reporting on key benchmarks of BHS system of care performance. Defining our own informational needs has been a thoughtful and rewarding process. This important endeavor is led internally by Commissioner Joe Metro and externally by the BHS driver of the data and reporting definition effort, Warren Hayes. Interaction with CALBHBC The MHC learned more about statewide mental health issues, training, resources, etc. tracked by the CALBHB/C from Theresa Comstock the CALBHB/C President. The MHC Chair also attended the CALBHB/C Bay Area April regional meeting and participated in in a call with other statewide MHC chairs regarding challenges and lessons learned in other counties. The urgent issue of disaster planning was called out, a topic that the MHC will study more in 2019 for our county. Membership Update • Current Number of Commissioners: 11 of 16 (5 open seats) • Current Commissioners: Barbara Serwin, District II, Diane Burgis, County Supervisor District III, Geri Stern, District I, Diana MaKieve, District II, John Kincaid, District II, Douglas Dunn, District III, Tasha Kamegai-Karadi, District IV, Sam Yoshioka, District IV, Leslie May, District V, Joe Metro, District V, Gina Swirsding, District I • Changes in Membership: • Duane Chapman, District I, who sadly passed away in December, after two years acting as Chair and strong advocacy for West County • Lauren Rettagliata, District II, who advocated tirelessly for housing for the seriously mentally ill, was co-author of the White Paper and major contributor to working with BHS to improve our system of care • • Julie Neward, District III (pending formal de-commissioning) • Challenges in Recruitment: Supervisor Burgis stated it well that for Supervisors, it is difficult to fill vacancies, specifically when there are certain requirements attached to them. This translated to as many as five open vacancies on the Commission at any given time, reducing capacity for representation of our community and for conducting the work of the Commission. Meghan Cullen, District V, Patrick Field, District III, Michael Ward, District V 6 Committee Reports Annual Report 2018 Justice Systems Committee • Participated in and/or observed the following advisory body meetings that help set and or implement the strategies of justice for adults and juveniles with mental illness in our County: o Community Corrections Partnership CCP (Quarterly) o Community Advisory Board CAB (Monthly- advisory to CCP) o Continuum of Care (Quarterly) o Council on Homelessness (Monthly) o Juvenile Justice (Monthly and meets in conflict with the MHC) o Assisted Outpatient Treatment. (Quarterly) • Partnered with Behavioral Health and Detention by participating in or observing the feedback of Rapid Improvement/Value Stream Mapping Events, impacting the receipt of treatment and care of those in Detention or upon their release. • Received information from Behavioral Health, Detention, Juvenile Justice and Office of Reentry and Justice to be informed about current operations as well as new programs funded through Prop 47 and AB109, including Antioch’s diversion program and reentry programs to connect individuals with programs and services upon reentry to avert future involvement in the criminal justice system. We also received information about our CORE Teams, MHET program, the Adult Crisis Response Team, Children’s Crisis Response Teams, and Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) program. • Took the first step to begin identifying areas of interest for a Detention/Office of Reentry and Justice, Data Dashboard, from the perspective of the Mental Health Commission. • Advocated for fully implementing and funding the Office of Reentry and Justice with a letter of support to the Board of Supervisors. • Tour of Juvenile Hall to more fully understand the integration of mental health treatment, continuing education, and safe and nurturing environment while incarcerated. 7 Quality of Care Committee 2018 Annual Report • Continued to review consumer advocacy and grievance procedures of Behavioral Health. Learned about some of the practices used by CCRMC in an effort to look for ways to learn from other successful systems. Advocated for the improvement of the problem resolution process and resources used at PES and 4C with the goal of bringing them more into alignment with those of the rest of CCRMC. Proposal to conduct a customer satisfaction survey and/or talk directly to consumer and family to measure satisfaction with the Behavioral Health Services problem resolution process. • Facilitated discussion of how Behavioral Health Services could improve its process of evaluating and tracking at-risk consumers and eliminate delays in the availability and delivery of patient care. • Continued to advocate for the development of a Crisis Inpatient/Residential Treatment Facility for Children and Young Adults, reviewing plans for a new feasibility analysis by Behavioral Health Services in 2019. • Reviewed how Behavioral Health Services monitors the performance of CBO’s operating board and care facilities, including augmented board and care facilities and services, when problems are identified through the annual (or triennial?) review process. Proposed the creation of a tool for monitoring and ensuring resolution of problems identified through the review process. This tool will be an extension to the tool developed by the MHC to review MHSA projects. • Participated in the development of a BHS “data dashboard” information model and report through discussion of the information needs of the committee. • Reviewed the 2017 EQRO Report on behalf of the Commission • Continued to track on quality of care information at PES. 8 MHSA-Finance Committee 2018 Annual Report • Fiscal and Program Reviews o January-June Meetings: Warren Hayes, MHSA Program Chief Mr. Hayes and MHSA staff kept the committee up-to-date on the schedule and outcome of Fiscal and Program Reviews of all 86 MHSA funded programs in the county. Major corrective action needed in several of the reviews (such as Hope House and COFY) were noted and discussed. Mr. Hayes apprised the Committee of how and when the required corrective actions had been taken and completed. Members of this Committee, as well as the Quality of Care Committee, the Mental Health Commission, and Community stakeholders will follow up to make sure how and when these corrective actions are completed. Depending on the nature of the Fiscal and Program Review Findings, the Commission will, if necessary, recommend contract provider changes to Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services BHS. The Commission will also promptly follow up on demonstrated deficiencies that arise between these reviews and with other non-MHSA programs overseen by BHS. Housing • July, August, and December meetings: Warren Hayes, MHSA Program Chief o Mr. Hayes kept the committee apprised of developments regarding funding housing opportunities for the most severely mentally ill among us, especially the $1.73M returned by the state and the $2.1M available in non-competitive funding provided by the new No Place Like Home (NPLH) initiative passed by voters in November, 2018. He has also let us know of the successive NPLH bidding opportunities “coming down the pike” in the next several years. o We had a discussion with Pat Godley, CEO of Mental Health Services regarding the Behavioral Health Budgeting Process and 2018 budget. • September Meeting: o The Committee hosted presentations by the Adults and Older Adults Division Chief, Dr. Jan-Cobelada-Kegler, Psy.D. and the Alcohol and Other Drugs (AOD) Program Director, Fatima Matal-Sol, LCSW. o Both Program Chiefs gave a detailed overview of their respective departments’ budgets and how they are developed. Dr. Cobelada-Kegler gave the latest updates on new programs, especially the Adult Mobil Crisis Response Team (MCRT) and how it fits into the adult system continuum of care. Ms. Matal-Sol gave a very comprehensive overview of the AOD budget process and how her department operates (10% county staff, 90% CBO staff). She also explained how the 1115 Drug Med-Cal Waiver (Whole Person Care) program is helping to greatly expand the integration of both AOD and mental health services throughout the county. Both persons answered in-depth questions posed by Committee members and other stakeholders. 9 • October Meeting: Children and Adolescents: Gerold Loenicker, LMFT, Program Chief o Mr. Loenicker gave a very comprehensive presentation of how children and adolescent budgets are developed. He also delved into the background behind the major expansion of the in-person SENECA Mobile Response Team hours, 7AM-11:30 PM M-F, and 9 AM-7 PM Saturday and Sunday, as well as 24/7 phone availability. SENECA serves the highest acute children and adolescents in this county. He also discussed the expanded school programs, especially in East County, that involve new CBO service providers. He also answered the in-depth questions posed by Committee members and other stakeholders. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute on behalf of the County Unpaid Student Training Agreement #26-579-6 with Mt. Diablo Unified School District, an educational institution, to provide supervised field instruction at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Contra Costa Health Centers to medical assistant and surgical technician program students from July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: This is a non-financial agreement. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this agreement is to provide medical assistant and surgical technician students at Mt. Diablo Unified School District, with the opportunity to integrate academic knowledge with applied skills at progressively higher levels of performance and responsibility. Supervised fieldwork experience for students is considered to be an integral part of both educational and professional preparation. The Health Services Department can provide the requisite field education, while at the same time, benefiting from the students’ services to patients. On April 24, 2012, the Board of Supervisors APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: A Floyd , M. Wilhelm C.161 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Unpaid Student Training Agreement #26-579-6 with Mt. Diablo Unified School District BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) approved Contract #26-579-3 (as amended by Contract Amendment Extension Agreements #26-579-4 and #26-579-5) with Mt. Diablo Unified School District, to provide supervised fieldwork instruction experience with Health Services for the period from April 17, 2012 through June 30, 2019. Approval of Unpaid Student Training Agreement #26-579-6 will allow Mt. Diablo Unified School District students to receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience, at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers through June 30, 2021. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the students will not receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience at CCRMC and Contra Costa Health Centers. RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. ACKNOWLEDGE the June 3, 2019 recommendation of the West Contra Costa Healthcare District (the “District”) Finance Committee to approve the refunding of the 2011 Certificates of Participation in the principal amount of approximately $41,000,000 dependent on final transaction costs. 2. ACKNOWLEDGE the refunding will result in a savings of approximately $417,000 annually in debt service and will remove the provision in the bankruptcy court agreement that requires the District to accelerate repayment of its 2011 Certificates of Participation by $1,000,000 annually beginning in 2022. 3. ADOPT, as the Governing Board of the District, Resolution 2019/183, approving the issuance by the District of its West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) to refund the District’s West Contra Costa Healthcare District Certificates of Participation (2011 Financing Program), of which $39,535,000 is currently outstanding. 4. AUTHORIZE the forms of and direct the execution and delivery of the financing documents, including: (i) an Indenture of Trust by and between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee; (ii) a Bond Purchase Agreement by and between the District and Pacific Western Bank; (iii) a Bond Purchase APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Laura Garvey, 925-957-5431 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: T Scott C.162 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:West Contra Costa Healthcare District 2011 Certificates of Participation Refunding RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) Agreement by and between the District and Western Alliance Business Trust, a wholly owned affiliate of Western Alliance Bank; and (iv) an Escrow Agreement by and between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as Escrow Bank. 5. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the taking of necessary actions and the execution of necessary documents in connection therewith. 6. ACKNOWLEDGE the June 3, 2019 recommendation of the District Finance Committee to approve the refunding of the 2011 Certificates of Participation in the principal amount of approximately $41,000,000 dependent on final transaction costs. 7. ACKNOWLEDGE the June 4, 2019 recommendation of the Debt Affordability Advisory Committee to approve the refunding of the 2011 Certificates of Participation in the principal amount of approximately $41,000,000 dependent on final transaction costs. FISCAL IMPACT: The refunding will result in $9.6 million in savings ($417,000 annually) and eliminate the bankruptcy provision that requires accelerated repayment of $1 million annually beginning in 2022. BACKGROUND: An advance refunding of the West Contra Costa Healthcare District’s (the “District”) 2011 Certificates of Participation (the “2011 COPs”) would achieve two objectives of the District: (i) it would provide for lower debt service payments over the remaining life of the 2011 COPs and (ii) it would eliminate the provision in the bankruptcy court agreement that requires the District to accelerate repayment of its 2011 COPs, by $1,000,000 annually beginning in 2022. These additional funds received from debt service savings due to this refunding could be available to the District for other eligible and legal purposes of the District. An advance refunding means the refunding debt is issued greater than 90 in advance of paying off the debt being refunded. A current refunding means debt is issued within 90 days of paying off the debt being refunded. In 2004, the District passed a super-majority parcel tax measure, known as Measure D, to provide the needed capital to take over operation of Doctors Medical Center after its prior operator, Tenet Healthcare Corporation, elected to terminate its lease of Doctors Medical Center with the District. The parcel taxes produce approximately $5.7 million in revenue annually, which parcel tax revenues are provided as security for the 2011 COPs and for Refunding Revenue Bonds issued by the District in 2018 (the “2018 Bonds”) that refunded Certificates of Participation issued by the District in 2004 (the “2004 COPs”). The obligation of the District to make payments from parcel taxes on the 2011 COPs is on parity with the District’s obligation to make payments on the 2018 Bonds. The 2004 COPs, the 2011 COPs, the 2018 Bonds and any other parity debt secured by parcel taxes of the District are hereinafter referred to as the Parcel Tax Obligations. In 2006, the District filed for relief under Chapter 9 Bankruptcy due to a lack of sufficient reimbursement received from Medi-Cal and Medicare and emerged from bankruptcy thereafter. In 2011, with heightened investor concerns due to the difficult financial condition of the District, it was determined that the District should provide statutory lien status for investors as to the parcel tax revenues securing its Parcel Tax Obligations. Senate Bill 644 was passed and signed into law to create a statutory lien against the District’s parcel tax revenues to ensure lenders that, in the event of any future bankruptcy filing, the terms of the Parcel Tax Obligations could not be modified by a bankruptcy court. Soon after passage of Senate Bill 644, the District issued its 2011 COPs to provide working capital, fund needed capital improvements to Doctors Medical Center and to repay an advance from Contra Costa County to the District. In 2015, the District closed Doctors Medical Center and in 2017 the District filed its second Chapter 9 Bankruptcy due to continuing operating difficulties and a failing hospital facility with the effective date of the Second Amended Plan for Adjustment of the District’s Debts occurring on April 3, 2018, when the District sold the Doctors Medical Center facility. The second plan of reorganization under which the District emerged from Bankruptcy was based on a number of factors agreed to by the District, including the refunding of the 2004 COPs and the 2011 COPs to the extent that a refunding is “commercially reasonable.” On April 17, 2018, the District completed a refunding (aka refinancing) of the 2004 COPs with proceeds from the issuance of the 2018 Bonds and subsequently paid off the 2004 COPs on May 4, 2018. This current refunding of the 2004 COPs saved the District just over $2.4 million in debt service payments. The District has been evaluating an advance refunding of its 2011 COPs for several months. Because the 2011 COPs do not allow for early prepayment until July 1, 2021, it cannot provide for a current refunding until April 2, 2021 (90 days prior to the first prepayment date). In addition, current tax law no longer allows for an advance refunding of tax-exempt obligations using the proceeds of tax-exempt debt. As such, the District has been evaluating an advance refunding of the 2011 COPs with taxable obligations instead of tax-exempt obligations, which structure is allowed by the current tax code. The District has evaluated the issuance of several alternative structures, including taxable refunding debt that is nonrated, rated and insured and taxable refunding debt that converts to tax-exempt at a point in time in the future. Of all the options considered, the most favorable option is to issue taxable rate debt converting to a tax-exempt rate on or after April 2, 2021 (within 90 days of the first prepayment date of the 2011 COPs being refunded). Financing Details Pursuant to the District’s recent Bankruptcy Plan of Reorganization, the District has an obligation to complete a refunding of its 2011 COPs to the extent that a refunding is “commercially reasonable.” The following is an overview of the circumstances, options considered and the preferred option being recommended for approved: a taxable rate refunding revenue bond converting to tax-exempt rate refunding revenue bond that advance refunds the District’s 2011 COPs. • The District’s 2011 COPs can be prepaid as early as July 1, 2021, and they carry an above market average interest rate of about 6.05%. • Because of tax reform, the District cannot advance refund the 2011 COPs on a tax-exempt basis. • Alternative refunding options include a taxable advance refunding that is rated by Fitch in the A or AA rating categories or a taxable advance refunding that converts to tax-exempt on or after April 2, 2021. • The most favorable option is a bank private placement of taxable rate refunding bonds that convert to a tax-exempt rate on the first date possible, in this case April 2, 2021. • Piper Jaffray, as Placement Agent for the District, has secured very attractive term sheets from both Western Alliance Bank and Pacific Western Bank for taxable bonds that convert to tax-exempt. These term sheets provide for a taxable rate of 5.00% from May 27, 2019 to April 1, 2021, with the conversion to a tax-exempt rate of 4.125% on April 2, 2021, and thereafter until they mature on July 1, 2042. • This unique structure, as proposed produce net present value savings of approximately $6.4 million which is over 16% of the par amount of the 2011 COPs. Total debt service savings is over $9.6 million. • Prior to conversion, the District must first request that the Bonds be converted to a tax-exempt rate and the investor will need to make a “meaningful choice” related to the bonds, in this case a choice among two alternative but similar amortization schedules. • Risks for the District on this financing are minimal and include the possibility that because of an unforeseen change in the tax code, the Bonds cannot be converted to tax-exempt on the conversion date. • Worst case, which the District's finance team feels is remote, is that the interest rate on the bonds never converts to the tax-exempt rate and remains at the 5.00% taxable rate until maturity or early prepayment. If this does occur, the District’s savings would still be approximately $2.7 million which is over 6.9% of the par amount of the 2011 COPs. However, the District is advised that the chance of this worst-case scenario occurring is not likely and the District retains the ability to prepay the bonds at par (no prepayment penalty) on any date. The District is advised that this taxable converting to tax-exempt structure would qualify as a commercially reasonable refunding because it would generate up to $9.6 million in total savings (on average $417,000 per year), and would require the District to proceed with all diligence in its completion per the terms of the Bankruptcy Plan of Reorganization. In addition, by refunding both the 2004 COPs (completed in 2018) and the 2011 COPs the District would no longer be required to accelerate the repayment of its 2011 COPs starting in 2022. This provision requires accelerated annual payments of $1 million; the refunding of the 2011 COPs would eliminate this requirement, giving the District more flexibility on how it uses its capital going forward. Various documents are necessary to complete the financing, including: (i) an Indenture of Trust by and between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee; (ii) a Bond Purchase Agreement by and between the District and Pacific Western Bank; (iii) a Bond Purchase Agreement by and between the District and Western Alliance Business Trust, a wholly owned affiliate of Western Alliance Bank; and (iv) an Escrow Agreement by and between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as Escrow Bank. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The District would not be able to generate savings of $9.6 million. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution 2019/183 (i) Indenture of Trust by and between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee; (ii) Bond Purchase Agreement by and between the District and Pacific Western Bank (iii) Bond Purchase Agreement by and between the District and Western Alliance Business Trust, a wholly owned affiliate of Western Alliance Bank; (iv) Escrow Agreement by and between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as Escrow Bank; and (v) Governing Board of West Contra Costa Healthcare District Resolution MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2019/183 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 06/11/2019 by the following vote: AYE:5 John Gioia Candace Andersen Diane Burgis Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2019/183 In The Matter Of: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FORM AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN INDENTURE, BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENTS AND AN ESCROW AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF REVENUE BONDS TO REFUND THE OUTSTANDING WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (2011 FINANCING PROGRAM), AND APPROVING CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the West Contra Costa Healthcare District (the “District”), as follows: WHEREAS, the District has heretofore caused the execution and delivery of its West Contra Costa Healthcare District Certificates of Participation (2011 Financing Program) (the “2011 COPs”), of which $39,535,000 is currently outstanding; and WHEREAS, the District has determined that, pursuant to that certain Second Amended Plan for the Adjustments of Debts, dated, July 21, 2017, in connection with the District’s Chapter 9 bankruptcy filing, as a result of favorable financial market conditions and for other reasons, it is in the best interests of the District at this time to provide for the refunding, on an advance basis, of the 2011 COPs; and WHEREAS, in furtherance thereof, the District has determined to issue its West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) (the “Bonds”), pursuant to the provisions of section 53570 et seq. of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the District’s obligation to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds will be secured by a first and prior lien on the revenues derived by the District from an annual special parcel tax on each taxable parcel of real property within the District (exclusive of parcels for which exemptions have been granted, approved by approximately 84% of the voters of the District at a special election held on June 8, 2004), on a parity with the District’s outstanding West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2018; and WHEREAS, the District has determined to authorize the officers of the District to take all necessary action to accomplish the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED and DETERMINED, as follows: Section 1. The Board hereby approves the refunding, on an advance basis, of the 2011 COPs by the issuance of the Bonds, without limitation as to principal amount, subject to a minimum annual savings of at least $100,000. Section 2. The form of indenture between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), as presented to this meeting (the “Indenture”), is hereby approved. The Executive Director or the Treasurer, the Chief Operating Officer & CFO of Contra Costa Health Services, or the designee thereof (each, an “Authorized Officer”), is hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the District, to execute and deliver the Indenture in substantially the form presented to this meeting, with such changes therein as the officer executing the same may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Indenture. The date, maturity date, interest rate, interest payment dates, denominations, forms, registration privileges, place or places of payment, terms of redemption and other terms of the Bonds shall be as provided in the Indenture, as finally executed. Section 3. The form of escrow agreement between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow bank (the “Escrow Bank”), with respect to the refunding of the 2011 COPs (the “Escrow Agreement”), as presented to this meeting, is hereby approved. Any Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the District, to execute and deliver the Escrow Agreement in substantially the form presented to this meeting, with such changes therein as the officer executing the same may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Escrow Agreement. Section 4. The form of Bond Purchase Agreement, each between the District and Pacific Western Bank and Western Alliance Business Trust, a wholly owned affiliate of Western Alliance Bank, an Arizona corporation, as purchasers, as presented to this meeting (the “Bond Purchase Agreements”), is hereby approved. Any Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed for and in the name of the District, to execute and deliver separate Bond Purchase Agreements in substantially the form presented to this meeting, with such changes therein as the officer executing the same may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Bond Purchase Agreements. Section 5. The Authorized Officers are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the District, to execute and deliver any other documents as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to implement the refinancing or to issue the Bonds, including retaining a bidding agent for the purchase of escrow securities, if required, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of such documents. Section 6. The Bonds shall be executed by the manual or facsimile signature of any Authorized Officer and attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the Secretary, or the designee thereof, in the form set forth in and otherwise in accordance with said indenture. Section 7. The Authorized Officers are hereby authorized and directed, for and on behalf of the District, to approve any changes to the foregoing documents, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof. Section 8. The Bonds, when so executed, shall be delivered to the Trustee for authentication by the Trustee. The Trustee is hereby requested and directed to authenticate the Bonds by executing the Trustee’s Certificate of Authentication appearing thereon, and to deliver the Bonds, when duly executed and authenticated, to the purchaser thereof in accordance with written instructions of the District. Said instructions shall provide for the delivery of the Bonds to the purchaser thereof upon payment of the purchase price thereof. Section 9. The Secretary or the designee thereof is hereby authorized and directed to attest the signature of the Authorized Officers, as may be required in connection with the execution and delivery of the Indenture, the Bond Purchase Agreements, the Escrow Agreement and the Bonds in accordance with this Resolution. Section 10. The Authorized Officers and other authorized officers of the District are each hereby authorized and directed to do the following with respect to the issuance of the Bonds: a. Take any and all actions and execute, acknowledge, deliver and file any and all agreements, instruments or other documents of any kind required of the District; and b. Act as an agent to the District for the purposes of issuing the Bonds and any additional negotiations, authorizations, approval, executions, consents, notices, deliveries or other acts required to issue such Bonds. Section 11. All actions taken by the Authorized Officers and other officers or directors of the District which have been undertaken to date or which will be undertaken with respect to the planning, negotiation, authorization, approvals and implementation of the financing plan are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved in all respects. Section 12. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. * * * * * * * * * I, the undersigned Secretary of the West Contra Costa Healthcare District, hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board at a meeting thereof on the 11th day of June, 2019, by the following vote of the members thereof: Contact: Laura Garvey, 925-957-5431 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: T Scott 23018.05 INDENTURE OF TRUST Dated as of June 1, 2019 by and between the WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee Relating to $___________ West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) -i- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS; CONTENT OF CERTIFICATES AND OPINIONS Section 1.01. Definitions ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Section 1.02. Content of Certificates and Opinions ............................................................................................... 9 ARTICLE II THE BONDS Section 2.01. Authorization of Bonds .................................................................................................................... 10 Section 2.02. Terms of the Bonds ............................................................................................................................ 10 Section 2.03. Form of Bonds .................................................................................................................................... 12 Section 2.04. Execution of Bonds ............................................................................................................................ 12 Section 2.05. Transfer of Bonds ............................................................................................................................... 13 Section 2.06. Exchange of Bonds ............................................................................................................................ 13 Section 2.07. Bond Register ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Section 2.08. Temporary Bonds .............................................................................................................................. 14 Section 2.09. Bonds Mutilated, Lost, Destroyed or Stolen .................................................................................. 14 ARTICLE III ISSUANCE OF BONDS; APPLICATION OF PROCEEDS Section 3.01. Issuance of the Bonds ........................................................................................................................ 15 Section 3.02. Application of Proceeds of Bonds ................................................................................................... 15 Section 3.03. Establishment and Application of Costs of Issuance Fund ......................................................... 15 Section 3.04. Validity of Bonds ............................................................................................................................... 15 ARTICLE IV REDEMPTION OF BONDS Section 4.01. Terms of Redemption ........................................................................................................................ 17 Section 4.02. Selection of Bonds for Redemption ................................................................................................. 17 Section 4.03. Notice of Redemption ....................................................................................................................... 17 Section 4.04. Partial Redemption of Bonds ........................................................................................................... 18 Section 4.05. Effect of Redemption ......................................................................................................................... 18 ARTICLE V OBLIGATION OF THE DISTRICT; PLEDGE OF PARCEL TAX REVENUES ............................................... 19 Section 5.01. Obligation of the District .................................................................................................................. 19 Section 5.02. Pledge of Parcel Tax Revenues; Transfer to Pay the Principal or Sinking Fund Installments of and Interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt; Release from Lien ......... 19 Section 5.03. Application of Moneys ..................................................................................................................... 20 Section 5.04. Limitations on Future Obligations Secured by Parcel Tax Revenues ........................................ 20 Section 5.05. Additional Payments ........................................................................................................................ 20 Section 5.06. Investment of Moneys in Funds and Accounts ............................................................................. 21 Section 5.07. Acquisition, Disposition and Valuation of Investments by the District .................................... 21 Section 5.08. Statutory Lien ..................................................................................................................................... 21 ARTICLE VI DISTRICT COVENANTS Section 6.01. Maintenance of Levy and Collection of the Parcel Tax ................................................................ 23 Section 6.02. Waiver of Laws .................................................................................................................................. 23 Section 6.02. No Arbitrage ....................................................................................................................................... 23 Section 6.03. Private Activity Bond Limitation .................................................................................................... 23 Section 6.04. Federal Guarantee Prohibition ........................................................................................................ 23 Section 6.05. Rebate Requirement .......................................................................................................................... 23 Section 6.06. Maintenance of Tax-Exemption ....................................................................................................... 23 -ii- Section 6.07. Further Assurances ............................................................................................................................ 23 Section 6.08. Bankruptcy Plan ................................................................................................................................. 23 ARTICLE VII REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE DISTRICT Section 7.01. Representations and Warranties of the District ............................................................................ 24 ARTICLE VIII PARTICULAR COVENANTS Section 8.01. Punctual Payment .............................................................................................................................. 26 Section 8.02. Extension of Payment of Bonds ....................................................................................................... 26 Section 8.03. Accounting Records and Financial Statements Relating to the Bonds ...................................... 26 Section 8.04. Information to be provided to the Owners .................................................................................... 26 Section 8.05. Additional Rights of the Original Purchasers ............................................................................... 27 Section 8.06. Waiver of Laws .................................................................................................................................. 27 ARTICLE IX EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES OF OWNERS Section 9.01. Events of Default ............................................................................................................................... 28 Section 9.02. Acceleration of Maturities ................................................................................................................ 29 Section 9.03. Application of Parcel Tax Revenues and Other Funds After Default ........................................ 29 Section 9.04. Trustee to Represent Owners ........................................................................................................... 30 Section 9.05. Owners’ Direction of Proceedings .................................................................................................. 31 Section 9.06. Limitation on Owners’ Right to Sue ............................................................................................... 31 Section 9.07. Absolute Obligation of District ........................................................................................................ 31 Section 9.08. Termination of Proceedings ............................................................................................................. 31 Section 9.09. Remedies Not Exclusive ................................................................................................................... 31 Section 9.10. No Waiver of Default ........................................................................................................................ 32 Section 9.11. Parties Interested Herein .................................................................................................................. 32 ARTICLE X THE TRUSTEE Section 10.01. Duties, Immunities and Liabilities of Trustee ............................................................................. 33 Section 10.02. Merger or Consolidation ................................................................................................................ 34 Section 10.03. Liability of Trustee .......................................................................................................................... 34 Section 10.04. Right of Trustee to Rely on Documents ....................................................................................... 35 Section 10.05. Preservation and Inspection of Documents ................................................................................. 35 Section 10.06. Compensation of Trustee ............................................................................................................... 36 Section 10.07. Indemnification ................................................................................................................................ 36 ARTICLE XI MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THIS INDENTURE Section 11.01. Amendments Permitted ................................................................................................................. 37 Section 11.02. Effect of Supplemental Indenture ................................................................................................. 38 Section 11.03. Endorsement of Bonds; Preparation of New Bonds ................................................................... 38 Section 11.04. Amendment of Particular Bonds ................................................................................................... 38 ARTICLE XII DEFEASANCE Section 12.01. Discharge of Indenture ................................................................................................................... 39 Section 12.02. Discharge of Liability on Bonds .................................................................................................... 39 Section 12.03. Deposit of Money or Securities with Trustee .............................................................................. 39 Section 12.04. Payment of Bonds After Discharge of Indenture ........................................................................ 40 -iii- ARTICLE XIII MISCELLANEOUS Section 13.01. Liability of District Limited to Parcel Tax Revenues .................................................................. 41 Section 13.02. Successor Is Deemed Included in All References to Predecessor ............................................. 41 Section 13.03. Limitation of Rights to Parties and Owners ................................................................................ 41 Section 13.04. Waiver of Notice .............................................................................................................................. 41 Section 13.05. Destruction of Bonds ....................................................................................................................... 41 Section 13.06. Severability of Invalid Provisions ................................................................................................. 41 Section 13.07. Notices ............................................................................................................................................... 41 Section 13.08. Evidence of Rights of Owners ....................................................................................................... 42 Section 13.09. Disqualified Bonds .......................................................................................................................... 43 Section 13.10. Money Held for Particular Bonds ................................................................................................. 43 Section 13.11. Funds and Accounts ........................................................................................................................ 43 Section 13.12. Article and Section Headings and References ............................................................................. 43 Section 13.13. Waiver of Personal Liability ........................................................................................................... 43 Section 13.14. Execution in Several Counterparts ................................................................................................ 44 Section 13.15. Judicial Reference ............................................................................................................................ 44 Section 13.16. Sovereign Immunity ........................................................................................................................ 45 Section 13.17. Governing Law ................................................................................................................................ 45 EXHIBIT A: FORM OF BONDS EXHIBIT B: FORM OF PURCHASER’S LETTER INDENTURE OF TRUST This INDENTURE OF TRUST (this “Indenture”), made and entered into and dated as of June 1, 2019, by and between WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, a local health care District of the State of California (the “District”), and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America and qualified to accept and administer the trusts hereby created (the “Trustee”). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the District has heretofore caused the execution and delivery of its West Contra Costa Healthcare District Certificates of Participation (2011 Financing Program) (the “2011 COPs”), of which $39,535,000 is currently outstanding; WHEREAS, the District has determined that, pursuant to that certain Second Amended Plan for the Adjustment of Debts, dated July 21, 2017, in connection with the District’s Chapter 9 bankruptcy filing, as a result of favorable financial market conditions and for other reasons, it is in the best interests of the District at this time to provide for the refunding of the 2011 COPs; WHEREAS, the District has determined to issue its West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) (the “Bonds”), in the aggregate principal amount of ________________ dollars ($___________) to (a) refund the 2011 COPs, and (b) pay the costs of issuance of the Bonds; WHEREAS, the Bonds are being issued pursuant to the provisions of section 53580 et seq. of the California Government Code; WHEREAS, the District’s obligation to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds will be secured by a first and prior lien on the revenues derived by the District from an annual special parcel tax on each taxable parcel of real property within the District (exclusive of parcels for which exemptions have been granted), approved by approximately 84% of the voters of the District at a special election held on June 8, 2004 (the “Parcel Tax Revenues”), on a parity with the District’s payment obligations with respect to its West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2018 (the “2018 Bonds”); WHEREAS, in order to provide for the authentication and delivery of the Bonds, to establish and declare the terms and conditions upon which the Bonds are to be issued and secured and to secure the payment of the principal or sinking fund installments thereof and interest thereon, the District has authorized the execution and delivery of this Indenture; and WHEREAS, the District has determined that all acts and proceedings required by law or necessary to make the Bonds, when executed by the District, authenticated and delivered by the Trustee and duly issued, the valid, binding and legal limited obligations of the District, and to constitute this Indenture a valid and binding agreement for the uses and purposes herein set forth in accordance with its terms, have been done and taken, and the execution and delivery of this Indenture have been in all respects duly authorized; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS INDENTURE WlTNESSETH, that in order to secure the payment of the principal or sinking fund installments of, and the interest on, all Bonds at any time issued and outstanding under this Indenture, according to their tenor, and to secure the performance and observance of all the covenants and conditions therein and herein set forth, -2- and to declare the terms and conditions upon and subject to which the Bonds are to be issued and received, and in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants herein contained and of the purchase and acceptance of the Bonds by the owners thereof, and for other valuable consideration, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the District does hereby covenant and agree with the Trustee for the benefit of the respective owners from time to time of the Bonds, as follows: -3- ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS; CONTENT OF CERTIFICATES AND OPINIONS Section 1.01. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Section 1.01 shall, for all purposes of this Indenture and of any Supplemental Indenture and of any certificate, opinion or other document herein mentioned, have the meanings herein specified, to be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of any of the terms herein defined. Unless otherwise defined in this Indenture, all terms used herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Law. “Authorized Representative” means, with respect to the District, the Executive Director, the Treasurer or any other person designated as an Authorized Representative of the District by a Certificate of the District signed by the Executive Director or the Treasurer and filed with the Trustee. “Board” means the Board of Directors of the District. “Bonds” means the West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt), issued under this Indenture. “Business Day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday, or a day on which banking institutions in the State or in the City of Los Angeles, California, or the City of San Francisco, California, are authorized or obligated by law or executive order to be closed. “Certificate,” “Statement,” “Request,” “Requisition” and “Order” of the District mean, respectively, a written certificate, statement, request, requisition or order signed in the name of the District by an Authorized Representative of the District. Any such instrument and supporting opinions or representations, if any, may, but need not, be combined in a single instrument with any other instrument, opinion or representation, and the two or more so combined shall be read and construed as a single instrument. If and to the extent required by Section 1.02 of this Indenture, each such instrument shall include the statements provided for in Section 1.02 of this Indenture. “Closing Date” means June 27, 2019, the date on which the Bonds are delivered by the District to the Original Purchasers. “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as in effect on the date of issuance of the Bonds or (except as otherwise referenced in this Indenture) as it may be amended to apply to obligations issued on the date of issuance of the Bonds, together with applicable proposed, temporary and final regulations promulgated, and applicable official public guidance published, under the Code. “Costs of Issuance” means all items of expense directly or indirectly payable by or reimbursable to the District and related to the authorization, execution, sale and delivery of the Bonds, including but not limited to filing fees, initial fees and charges of the Trustee, legal fees, including fees of counsel to the District, fees of bond counsel, fees of counsel to the Original Purchasers, financial and municipal advisory fees and charges, the fee payable to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission and any other cost, charge or fee in connection with the original delivery of Bonds. -4- “Costs of Issuance Fund” means the fund so designated and established pursuant to Section 3.03 of this Indenture. “County” means Contra Costa County, California. “Date of Taxability” means the date from and for which interest on the Bonds is subject to federal or State income taxation as a result of a Determination of Taxability. “Debt Service Fund” means the fund by that name established pursuant to Section 5.02(b) of this Indenture. “Default Rate” means the then prevailing interest rate plus 4.00%. “Defeasance Obligations” means: (a) direct obligations of the United States of America (including obligations issued or held in book-entry form on the books of the Department of the Treasury of the United States of America); (b) certificates which evidence ownership of the right to the payment of the principal of and interest on obligations described in clause (a), provided that such obligations are held in the custody of a bank or trust company in a special account separate from the general assets of such custodian; (c) the interest component of securities issued by the Resolution Funding Corporation which have been stripped by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in book-entry form; (d) obligations, the interest on which is excluded from gross income for federal or State income tax purposes pursuant to section 103 of the Code and the timely payment of principal of and interest on which is fully provided for by the irrevocable deposit in trust or escrow of cash or obligations described in clause (a) of this definition, and which are rated by S&P and by Moody’s in their highest rating categories and the trust or escrow instructions for which cannot be amended to provide for redemption of such obligations prior to the date set forth in the trust or escrow agreement governing such deposit; and (e) obligations issued by agencies of the United States of America which are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States of America. “Determination of Taxability” means any determination, decision, or decree made by the Commissioner or any District Director of the Internal Revenue Service, or by any court of competent jurisdiction, that as a result of any actions or omissions or the District with respect to the Bonds, the interest payable on the Bonds is includable in the gross income for federal or State income tax purposes of the Owners, provided, however, that no such Determination of Taxability shall be deemed to have occurred if the District is contesting such determination in good faith and is diligently proceeding to prosecute such contest until the earliest of (a) a final determination from which no appeal may be taken with respect to such determination, or (b) abandonment of such appeal by the District. “District” means West Contra Costa Healthcare District, a local health care district duly organized and existing under the laws of the State. “Escrow Agreement” means that certain Escrow Agreement, dated the Closing Date, by and between the District and the Escrow Bank, as originally entered into or as it may be amended or supplemented pursuant to the provisions thereof, created to provide for the payment and redemption of the 2011 COPs. “Escrow Bank” means U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow agent under the Escrow Agreement, or any successor thereto appointed as escrow agent thereunder in accordance with the provisions thereof. -5- “Escrow Fund” means the escrow fund created and maintained by the Escrow Bank pursuant to the Escrow Agreement. “Event of Default” means any of the events specified in Section 9.01 of this Indenture. “Fair Market Value” means the price at which a willing buyer would purchase the investment from a willing seller in a bona fide, arm’s length transaction (determined as of the date the contract to purchase or sell the investment becomes binding) if the investment is traded on an established securities market (within the meaning of section 1273 of the Code) and, otherwise, the term “Fair Market Value” means the acquisition price in a bona fide arm’s length transaction (as referenced above) if (i) the investment is a certificate of deposit that is acquired in accordance with applicable regulations under the Code, (ii) the investment is an agreement with specifically negotiated withdrawal or reinvestment provisions and a specifically negotiated interest rate (for example, a guaranteed investment contract, a forward supply contract or other investment agreement) that is acquired in accordance with applicable regulations under the Code, (iii) the investment is a United States Treasury Security—State and Local Government Series that is acquired in accordance with applicable regulations of the United States Bureau of Public Debt, or (iv) any commingled investment fund in which the District and related parties do not own more than a ten percent (10%) beneficial interest therein if the return paid by the fund is without regard to the source of the investment. “Federal Securities” means (a) cash (insured at all times by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), and (b) obligations of, or obligations guaranteed as to principal and interest by, the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof, when such obligations are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States including: (i) United States treasury obligations, (ii) all direct or fully guaranteed obligations, (iii) Farmers Home Administration, (iv) General Services Administration, (v) Guaranteed Title XI financing, (vi) Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), and (vi) State and Local Government Series. “Fiscal Year” means the period beginning on January 1 of each year and ending on December 31 of such year, or any other twelve-month period hereafter selected and designated as the official fiscal year period of the District. “Indenture” means this Indenture, as originally executed or as it may from time to time be supplemented, modified or amended by any Supplemental Indenture. “Interest Payment Date” means January 1 and July 1 in each year, commencing January 1, 2020. “Law” means the provisions of Article 11 (commencing with section 53580) of the California Government Code, as now in effect and as it may from time to time hereafter be amended or supplemented. “Lien Statute” means section 5451.5 of the California Government Code. “Mandatory Sinking Account Payment” means, with respect to Bonds, the amount required by this Indenture to be paid by the District on any single date for the retirement of the Bonds. “Moody’s” means Moody’s Investors Service, its successors and their assigns. “Opinion of Counsel” means a written opinion of counsel (who may be counsel for the District) selected by the District. If and to the extent required by the provisions of Section 1.02 of -6- this Indenture, each Opinion of Counsel shall include the statements provided for in Section 1.02 of this Indenture. “Original Purchasers” means Pacific Western Bank and Western Alliance Business Trust, a wholly owned affiliate of Western Alliance Bank, an Arizona corporation, the first purchasers of the Bonds upon their authentication and delivery by the Trustee on the Closing Date, each of their successors and assigns. “Outstanding,” when used as of any particular time with reference to Bonds, means (subject to the provisions of Section 13.09 of this Indenture) all Bonds theretofore, or thereupon being, authenticated and delivered by the Trustee under this Indenture except (a) Bonds theretofore canceled by the Trustee or surrendered to the Trustee for cancellation; (b) Bonds with respect to which all liability of the District shall have been discharged in accordance with Section 12.02 of this Indenture, including Bonds (or portions of Bonds) referred to in Section 13.10 of this Indenture; and (c) Bonds for the transfer or exchange of or in lieu of or in substitution for which other Bonds shall have been authenticated and delivered by the Trustee pursuant to this Indenture. “Owners,” whenever used in this Indenture with respect to the Bonds, means the persons in whose name the Bonds are registered in the registration books of the Trustee. Initially, the Owners are the Original Purchasers. “Parcel Tax” means the annual special parcel tax on each taxable parcel of real property within the District (exclusive of parcels for which exemptions have been granted), approved by approximately 84% of the voters of the District at a special election held on June 8, 2004. “Parcel Tax Revenues” means the amounts collected by the County on behalf of the District derived from the Parcel Tax. “Parity Debt” means indebtedness or other obligations (including leases and installment sale agreements) hereafter issued or incurred and secured by a pledge of and lien on Parcel Tax Revenues equally and ratably with the Bonds. Parity Debt specifically includes the 2018 Bonds. “Permitted Investments” means any of the following, but only to the extent that the same are acquired at Fair Market Value, provided that the Trustee is entitled to conclusively rely upon any investment direction received by it under this Indenture as a certification that such investment constitutes a Permitted Investment under this Indenture: (a) Federal Securities. (b) Bonds, debentures, notes or other evidence of indebtedness issued or guaranteed by any of the following federal agencies and provided such obligations are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States of America (stripped securities are only permitted if they have been stripped by the agency itself): 1. U.S. Export-Import Bank (Eximbank) Direct obligations or fully guaranteed certificates of beneficial ownership 2. U.S. Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) Certificates of Beneficial Ownership 3. Federal Financing Bank -7- 4. Federal Housing Administration Debentures (FHA) 5. General Services Administration Participation Certificates 6. Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA or Ginnie Mae) GNMA—guaranteed mortgage-backed bonds GNMA—guaranteed pass-through obligations 7. U.S. Maritime Administration Guaranteed Title XI financing 8. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Project Notes Local Authority Bonds New Communities Debentures - U.S. government guaranteed debentures U.S. Public Housing Notes and Bonds - U.S. government guaranteed public housing notes and bonds (c) Bonds, debentures, notes or other evidence of indebtedness issued or guaranteed by any of the following federal agencies which are not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States of America (stripped securities are only permitted if they have been stripped by the agency itself): 1. Federal Home Loan Bank System Senior debt obligations 2. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC or Freddie Mac) Participation Certificate Senior debt obligations 3. Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA or Fannie Mae) Mortgage-backed securities and senior debt obligations 4. Student Loan Marketing Association (SLMA or Sallie Mae) Senior debt obligations 5. Resolution Funding Corp. (REFCORP) obligations 6. Farm Credit System Consolidated system wide bonds and notes (d) Money market funds registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940, whose shares are registered under the Federal Securities Act of 1933, which invest solely in Federal Securities, if rated by S&P, having a rating of AAAm-G; and if rated by Moody’s having a rating of Aaa, including such funds for which the Trustee, its affiliates or subsidiaries provide investment advisory or other management services or for which the Trustee or an affiliate of the Trustee serves as investment administrator, shareholder servicing agent, and/or custodian or subcustodian, notwithstanding that (i) the Trustee or an affiliate of the Trustee receives and collects a fee for services provided to the fund, whether as a custodian, transfer agent, investment advisor or otherwise, (ii) the Trustee collects fees for services rendered pursuant to this Indenture, which fees are separate from the fees received from such funds, and (iii) services -8- performed for such funds and pursuant to this Indenture may at times duplicate those provided to such funds by the Trustee or an affiliate of the Trustee. (e) Certificates of deposit or deposit accounts secured at all times by collateral described in (a) and/or (b) above. Such certificates must be issued by commercial banks or savings and loan associations (including the Trustee or its affiliates). The collateral must be held by a third party and the bondholders must have a perfected first security interest in the collateral. (f) Certificates of deposit, savings accounts, deposit accounts or money market deposits which are fully insured by FDIC including those of the Trustee or its affiliates. (g) Commercial paper rated, at the time of purchase, “Prime-1” by Moody’s and “A-1” or better by S&P. (h) Deposit accounts, Federal funds or bankers acceptances with a maximum term of 180 days of any bank which has an unsecured, uninsured and unguaranteed obligation rating of “Prime-1” or better by Moody’s and “A-1” or better by S&P. (i) the Local Agency Investment Fund of the State, created pursuant to 16429.1 of the California Government Code. “Principal Corporate Trust Office” or “principal corporate trust office” means the office of the Trustee at One California Street, Suite 1000, San Francisco, CA 94111, or such other or additional offices as may be specified to the District by the Trustee except that with respect to presentation of Bonds for payment or for registration of transfer and exchange of Bonds such term shall mean the office or agency of the Trustee at which, at any particular time, its corporate trust agency or operations business shall be conducted, initially in St. Paul, Minnesota. “Record Date” means the fifteenth (15th) calendar day of the month (even if such day is a holiday or not a Business Day) next preceding each Interest Payment Date. “S&P” means S&P Global Ratings Services, a Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC business, its successors and assigns. “Serial Bonds” means the Bonds, falling due by their terms in specified years, for which no Mandatory Sinking Account Payments are provided. “Special Record Date” means the date established by the Trustee pursuant to Section 2.02 of this Indenture as the record date for the payment of defaulted interest on the Bonds. “State” means the State of California. “Subordinate Debt” means indebtedness or other obligations (including leases and installment sale agreements) hereafter issued or incurred and secured by a pledge of and lien on Parcel Tax Revenues which by its terms is subordinate to the payment of the principal or sinking fund installments of and interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt and subordinate to the security and right to payment of the principal or sinking fund installments of and interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt in the event of default or default under such Subordinate Debt. “Supplemental Indenture” means any indenture hereafter duly authorized and entered into between the District and the Trustee supplementing, modifying or amending this -9- Indenture, but only if and to the extent that such Supplemental Indenture is specifically authorized under this Indenture. “Tax-Exempt Rate” means 4.125% per annum based on a 30-day month and a 360-day year for calculating interest. “Taxable Rate” means 5.000% per annum based on a 30-day month and a 360-day year for calculating interest. “Trustee” means U.S. Bank National Association, a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, or its successor, as Trustee as provided in Section 10.01 of this Indenture. “2011 COPs” means the West Contra Costa Healthcare District Certificates of Participation (2011 Financing Program), of which $39,535,000 is currently outstanding. “2018 Bonds” means the West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2018. Section 1.02. Content of Certificates and Opinions. Every certificate or opinion provided for in this Indenture with respect to compliance with any provision of this Indenture shall include (a) a statement that the person making or giving such certificate or opinion has read such provision and the definitions in this Indenture relating thereto; (b) a brief statement as to the nature and scope of the examination or investigation upon which the certificate or opinion is based; (c) a statement that, in the opinion of such person, he or she has made or caused to be made such examination or investigation as is necessary to enable him or her to express an informed opinion with respect to the subject matter referred to in the instrument to which his or her signature is affixed; and (d) a statement as to whether, in the opinion of such person, such provision has been complied with. Any such certificate or opinion made or given by an officer of the District may be based, insofar as it relates to legal, accounting or health facility matters, upon a certificate or opinion of or representation by counsel, unless such officer knows, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, that the certificate, opinion or representation with respect to the matters upon which such certificate or statement may be based, as aforesaid, is erroneous. Any such certificate or opinion made or given by counsel may be based, insofar as it relates to factual matters (with respect to which information is in the possession of the District) upon a certificate or opinion of or representation by an officer of the District, unless such counsel knows, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, that the certificate or opinion or representation with respect to the matters upon which such person’s certificate or opinion or representation may be based, as aforesaid, is erroneous. The same officer of the District, or the same counsel, as the case may be, need not certify to all of the matters required to be certified under any provision of this Indenture, but different officers or counsel may certify to different matters, respectively. -10- ARTICLE II THE BONDS Section 2.01. Authorization of Bonds. The Bonds are hereby authorized to be issued by the District under and subject to the terms of the Law and this Indenture. This Indenture constitutes a continuing agreement with the Owners issued under this Indenture and then Outstanding to secure the full and final payment of principal of and the interest on all Bonds which may from time to time be executed and delivered under this Indenture, subject to the covenants, agreements, provisions and conditions herein contained. The Bonds shall be designated the “West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt).” Section 2.02. Terms of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be issued as two, fully registered bond, without coupons in the total principal amount thereof. The Bonds shall mature on July 1, 2042, and shall bear interest initially at the Taxable Rate; provided, however, that so long as an Event of Default shall have occurred and is continuing, the interest rate may, at the option of the Owners, be increased to the Default Rate, as provided in a written notice to the Trustee and the District. Interest shall be computed on a 30/360 basis. All interest payable under on the Bonds shall be computed using this method. The Bonds shall not be (i) assigned a rating by any rating agency, (ii) registered with The Depository Trust Company or any other securities depository, (iii) issued pursuant to any type of offering document or official statement, or (iv) assigned CUSIP numbers by Standard & Poor’s CUSIP Service Bureau. Registered ownership of the Bonds, or any portion thereof, may not thereafter be transferred except as set forth in this Indenture. The interest rate payable with respect to the Bonds shall convert to the Tax-Exempt Rate, on any date on and after April 2, 2021 (the “Tax-Exempt Conversion Date”), upon the satisfaction of the following conditions precedent to such conversion: (i) The election by the District to convert the interest rate with respect to the Bonds to the Tax-Exempt Rate; (ii) Selection by the Original Purchasers of one of the following semi-annual principal amortization schedules which shall become applicable to all Bonds to maturity which selection the Original Purchasers shall make if the District exercises the election described in 2.02(i): -11- Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount †Maturity or Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount †Maturity (iii) Appropriate amendments or supplements to this Indenture, if required, subject to the requirements of Section 7.01 hereof; (iv) Delivery of an arbitrage certificate executed by the District with respect to certain tax matters relating to the Bonds after interest with respect thereto is converted to the Tax-Exempt Rate; (v) The filing of an IRS Form 8038-G, executed by the District; and (vi) Issuance of an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that the conditions precedent set forth above to the conversion of interest with respect to the Bonds to the Tax-Exempt Rate have been satisfied and that subject to the District’s compliance with certain covenants, interest with respect to the Bonds is excludable from gross income of -12- the Owners for federal income tax purposes and is not included as an item of tax preference in computing the alternative minimum tax for individuals under the Code. If the Bonds are payable at the Tax-Exempt Rate, after the Date of Taxability following a Determination of Taxability, the interest rate may, at the option of the Owners, be increased to the Taxable Rate, as provided in a written notice of the Owners to the Trustee and the District. (b) Interest on the Bonds (including the final interest payment upon maturity or earlier redemption) shall be payable on each Interest Payment Date to the persons whose name appears on the Registration Books as the Owners thereof as of the Record Date immediately preceding each such Interest Payment Date, such interest to be paid by check of the Trustee mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, on the Interest Payment Date, to such Owners at the address of such Owner as it appears on the Registration Books as of such Record Date; provided however, that payment of interest may be by wire transfer to an account in the United States of America to any Owner who shall furnish written wire instructions to the Trustee on or before the applicable Record Date. Such instructions shall remain in effect until rescinded in writing by such Owner. Principal of any Bond shall be paid upon presentation and surrender thereof, at maturity or redemption, at the Principal Corporate Trust Office. Both the principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America. (c) The Bonds shall be dated as of their date of delivery and shall bear interest from the Interest Payment Date next preceding the date of authentication thereof, unless (a) it is authenticated after a Record Date and on or before the following Interest Payment Date, in which event it shall bear interest from such Interest Payment Date; or (b) the Bonds are authenticated on or before December 15, 2019, in which event they shall bear interest from their date of delivery; provided, however, that if, as of the date of authentication of the Bonds, interest thereon is in default, the Bonds shall bear interest from the Interest Payment Date to which interest has previously been paid or made available for payment thereon. (d) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, so long as the Bonds are owned by the Original Purchasers, (A) the Trustee shall pay principal of and interest on the Bonds when due by wire transfer in immediately available funds to the Original Purchasers in accordance with wire transfer instructions set forth below (or such other wire instructions as shall be filed by the Original Purchasers with the Trustee from time to time), (B) payments of principal on the Bonds shall be made without the requirement for presentation and surrender of the Bonds by the Original Purchasers, and the Trustee shall not be required to give notice to the Owners of the mandatory sinking fund redemption of Bonds; (e) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if any Interest Payment Date is not a Business Day, payments of principal and interest shall be due on the next succeeding Business Day with the same force and affect as if such payments were made on the Interest Payment Date. Section 2.03. Form of Bonds. The Bonds, the Trustee’s Certificate of Authentication, and the Assignment to appear thereon, shall be substantially in the forms set forth in Exhibit A, which are attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein, with such variations, omissions and insertions, as permitted or required by this Indenture. Section 2.04. Execution of Bonds. The Bonds shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the District with the facsimile or manual signature of an Authorized Representative and attested by the facsimile or manual signature of the Secretary of the Board. The Bonds shall then be delivered to the Trustee for authentication by it. In case any of the officers who shall have signed or attested any of the Bonds shall cease to be such officer or officers of the District before -13- the Bonds so signed or attested shall have been authenticated or delivered by the Trustee or issued by the District, such Bonds may nevertheless be authenticated, delivered and issued and, upon such authentication, delivery and issue, shall be as binding upon the District as though those who signed and attested the same had continued to be such officers of the District and also any Bond may be signed and attested on behalf of the District by such persons as at the actual date of execution of such Bond shall be the proper officers of the District although at the nominal date of such Bond any such person shall not have been such officer of the District. Only Bonds as shall bear thereon a certificate of authentication substantially in the form set forth in Exhibit A attached to this Indenture, manually executed by the Trustee, shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to the benefits of this Indenture, and such certificate of the Trustee shall be conclusive evidence that the Bonds so authenticated have been duly executed, authenticated and delivered under this Indenture and are entitled to the benefits of this Indenture. Section 2.05. Transfer of Bonds. (a) The Bonds may, in accordance with its terms, be transferred, on any date after June 30, 2021, upon the Registration Books, by the person in whose name it is registered, in person or by a duly authorized attorney of such person, upon surrender of such Bond to the Trustee at its Principal Corporate Trust Office for cancellation, accompanied by delivery of a written instrument of transfer in a form acceptable to the Trustee, duly executed. Whenever any Bonds shall be surrendered for registration of transfer, the District shall execute and the Trustee shall deliver a new Bond or Bonds, of like interest rate, maturity and principal amount of authorized denominations. The Trustee shall collect from the Owners any tax or other governmental charge on the transfer of any Bonds pursuant to this Section 2.05. The cost of printing Bonds and any services rendered or expenses incurred by the Trustee in connection with any transfer shall be paid by the District. The Trustee may refuse to transfer, under the provisions of this Section 2.05, either (a) any Bonds during the period fifteen (15) days prior to the date established by the Trustee for the selection of Bonds for redemption, or (b) any Bonds selected by the Trustee for redemption. (b) Ownership of the Bonds may be transferred in minimum denominations of $1,000,000, but only to a person that the transferring Owner reasonably believes is either: (i) a qualified institutional buyer within the meaning of Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, (ii) an accredited investor as defined in Section 501(a)(1), (2), (3) or (7) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or (iii) a trust, partnership, custodial arrangement or similar entity, interests in which are offered and sold in a private placement or limited offering only to qualified institutional buyers or accredited investors; in each case that executes and delivers to the Trustee a letter in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit B attached to this Indenture. Section 2.06. Exchange of Bonds. Bonds may be exchanged at the Principal Corporate Trust Office or such other location as the Trustee shall, from time to time, designate, for a like aggregate principal amount of Bonds of other authorized denominations of the same maturity; provided that the Trustee may refuse registration of transfer or exchange following the selection -14- of Bonds for redemption, or of any Bond selected for redemption. The Trustee shall require the Owner requesting such exchange to pay any tax or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such exchange. The cost of printing Bonds and any services rendered or expenses incurred by the Trustee in connection with any exchange shall be paid by the District. Section 2.07. Bond Register. The Trustee will keep or cause to be kept, at its Principal Corporate Trust Office, sufficient books for the registration and transfer of the Bonds, which shall at all times be open to inspection by the District or the Owners with reasonable prior written notice during regular business hours; and, upon presentation for such purpose, the Trustee shall, under such reasonable regulations as it may prescribe, register or transfer or cause to be registered or transferred, on such books, Bonds as hereinbefore provided. Section 2.08. Temporary Bonds. The Bonds may be issued in temporary form exchangeable for definitive Bonds when ready for delivery. Any temporary Bond may be printed, lithographed or typewritten, shall be of such denomination as may be determined by the District, shall be in registered form and may contain such reference to any of the provisions of this Indenture as may be appropriate. A temporary Bond may be in the form of a single Bond payable in installments, each on the date, in the amount and at the rate of interest established for the Bonds. Every temporary Bond shall be executed by the District and authenticated by the Trustee upon the same conditions and in substantially the same manner as the definitive Bonds. If the District issues temporary Bonds it will execute and deliver definitive Bonds as promptly thereafter as practicable, and thereupon the temporary Bonds shall be surrendered, for cancellation, in exchange therefor at the Principal Corporate Trust Office and the Trustee shall authenticate and deliver in exchange for such temporary Bonds an equal aggregate principal amount of definitive Bonds of authorized denominations. Until so exchanged, the temporary Bonds shall be entitled to the same benefits under this Indenture as definitive Bonds authenticated and delivered under this Indenture. Section 2.09. Bonds Mutilated, Lost, Destroyed or Stolen. If any Bond shall become mutilated, the District shall execute, and the Trustee shall thereupon authenticate and deliver, a new Bond of like tenor in exchange and substitution for the Bond so mutilated, but only upon surrender to the Trustee of the Bond so mutilated. Every mutilated Bond so surrendered to the Trustee shall be canceled by it and delivered to, or upon the order of, the District. If any Bond shall be lost, destroyed or stolen, evidence of such loss, destruction or theft may be submitted to the Trustee and, if such evidence be satisfactory to the Trustee and indemnity satisfactory to the Trustee shall be given, the District shall execute, and the Trustee shall thereupon authenticate and deliver, a new Bond of like tenor in lieu of and in substitution for the Bond so lost, destroyed or stolen (or if any such Bond shall have matured, instead of issuing a substitute Bond, the Trustee may pay the same without surrender thereof upon receipt of indemnity satisfactory to the Trustee). The District may require payment of extraordinary expenses, if any, which may be incurred by the District and the Trustee in connection with the foregoing. Any Bond issued under the provisions of this Section 2.09 in lieu of any Bond alleged to be lost, destroyed or stolen shall constitute an original additional contractual obligation on the part of the District whether or not the Bond so alleged to be lost, destroyed or stolen be at any time enforceable by anyone, and shall be entitled to the benefits of this Indenture with all other Bonds secured by this Indenture. -15- ARTICLE III ISSUANCE OF BONDS; APPLICATION OF PROCEEDS Section 3.01. Issuance of the Bonds. At any time after the execution and delivery of this Indenture, the District may sell and execute and the Trustee shall authenticate and, upon Request of the District, deliver the Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of _______________ dollars ($___________). Section 3.02. Application of Proceeds of Bonds. The proceeds received from the sale of the Bonds in the amount of $___________.00 (consisting of the par amount of the Bonds), shall be deposited in trust with the Trustee, who shall forthwith transfer or deposit such proceeds as follows: (a) the Trustee shall transfer the sum of $_________ to the Escrow Bank for deposit in the Escrow Fund; and (b) the Trustee shall deposit the remaining amount ($________) in the Costs of Issuance Fund. The Trustee may establish such temporary funds or accounts in its records as it may deem appropriate to facilitate such transfer and deposit. Section 3.03. Establishment and Application of Costs of Issuance Fund. The Trustee shall establish, maintain and hold in trust a separate fund designated as the “Costs of Issuance Fund.” Moneys deposited in said fund shall be used to pay Costs of Issuance of the Bonds upon Requisition of the District stating the person to whom payment is to be made, the amount to be paid, the purpose for which the obligation was incurred and that such payment is a proper charge against the Costs of Issuance Fund. On the date three months after the Closing Date, or upon earlier receipt of a Certificate of the District that amounts in the Costs of Issuance Fund are no longer required for the payment of Costs of Issuance, the Costs of Issuance Fund shall be terminated and any amounts then remaining in the Costs of Issuance Fund shall be transferred to the Debt Service Fund and applied as soon as possible to the payment of the principal of the Bonds and the Costs of Issuance Fund shall be closed. Section 3.04. Validity of Bonds. (a) The Board has reviewed all proceedings heretofore taken relative to the authorization of the Bonds and has found, as a result of such review, and hereby finds and determines that all acts, conditions and things required by law to exist, happen or be performed precedent to and in the issuance of the Bonds do exist, have happened and have been performed in due time, form and manner as required by law, and the Board is now authorized, pursuant to each and every requirement of the Law to issue the Bonds in the form and manner provided in this Indenture and the Bonds shall be entitled to the benefit, protection and security of the provisions of this Indenture. (b) From and after the issuance of the Bonds the findings and determinations of the Board respecting the Bonds shall be conclusive evidence of the existence of the facts so found and determined in any action or proceeding in any court in which the validity of the Bonds is at issue, and no bona fide purchaser of any of the Bonds shall be required to see to the existence of any fact or to the performance of any condition or to the taking of any proceeding required prior to such issuance or to the application of the proceeds of sale of the Bonds. The recital -16- contained in the Bonds that the same are issued pursuant to the Law and this Indenture shall be conclusive evidence of their validity and of the regularity of the issuance and all Bonds shall be incontestable from and after their issuance. The Bonds shall be deemed to be issued, within the meaning of this Indenture, whenever the definitive Bonds (or any temporary Bonds exchangeable therefor) have been delivered to the Original Purchasers thereof and the proceeds of sale thereof received. -17- ARTICLE IV REDEMPTION OF BONDS Section 4.01. Terms of Redemption. (a) Optional Redemption of Bonds. The Bonds are subject to redemption, at the option of the District on any Interest Payment Date, as a whole or in part, from any available source of funds, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof, together with accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption, without premium. The District shall be required to give the Trustee written notice of its intention to redeem Bonds under this subsection (a) at least forty-five (45) days (or such lesser number of days as acceptable to the Trustee, in the sole discretion of the Trustee), but not more than seventy-five (75) days, prior to the date fixed for such redemption. (b) Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption of Bonds. Subject to a variation in the sinking fund schedule redemption selected by the Original Purchasers in connection with the conversion of interest on the Bonds to the Tax-Exempt Rate pursuant to Section 2.02(b), the Bonds are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption on January 1 and July 1 in each year, on the dates and in the amounts specified in the following table. Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount January 1, 2020 January 1, 2028 July 1, 2035 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2028 January 1, 2036 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2029 July 1, 2036 July 1, 2021 July 1, 2029 January 1, 2037 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2030 July 1, 2037 July 1, 2022 July 1, 2030 January 1, 2038 January 1, 2023 January 1, 2031 July 1, 2038 July 1, 2023 July 1, 2031 January 1, 2039 January 1, 2024 January 1, 2032 July 1, 2039 July 1, 2024 July 1, 2032 January 1, 2040 January 1, 2025 January 1, 2033 July 1, 2040 July 1, 2025 July 1, 2033 January 1, 2041 January 1, 2026 January 1, 2034 July 1, 2041 July 1, 2026 July 1, 2034 January 1, 2042 January 1, 2027 January 1, 2035 July 1, 2042 July 1, 2027 †Maturity Section 4.02. Selection of Bonds for Redemption. Whenever provision is made in this Indenture for the redemption of less than all of the Bonds the Trustee shall select the Bonds to be redeemed, from all Bonds not previously called for redemption, by lot in any manner which the Trustee in its sole discretion shall deem appropriate. The Trustee shall promptly notify the District in writing of the Bonds or portions thereof so selected for redemption. Section 4.03. Notice of Redemption. Notice of redemption shall be mailed by first class mail by the Trustee, not less than thirty (30) days prior to the redemption date (which redemption date shall not be less than sixty (60) days after notice of redemption pursuant to Section 4.01(a) of this Indenture shall have been delivered to the Trustee by the District), to the Owners at their addresses appearing on the bond registration books of the Trustee. Each notice of redemption shall state the date of such notice, the Bonds to be redeemed, the date of issue of -18- the Bonds, the redemption date, the redemption price, the place or places of redemption (including the name and appropriate address or addresses of the Trustee), and, if less than all of any such maturity, the distinctive certificate numbers of the Bonds, to be redeemed. Each such notice shall also state that on said date there will become due and payable on each of said Bonds the redemption price thereof or of said specified portion of the principal amount thereof in the case of a Bond to be redeemed in part only, together with interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, and that from and after such redemption date interest thereon shall cease to accrue, and shall require that such Bonds be then surrendered at the address or addresses of the Trustee specified in the redemption notice. Notice of redemption shall not be required with respect to Bonds redeemed pursuant to Section 4.01(b). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of any optional redemption of the Bonds pursuant to Section 4.01(a), the notice of redemption may state that the redemption is conditioned upon receipt by the Trustee of sufficient moneys to redeem the Bonds on the anticipated redemption date, and that the optional redemption shall not occur if, by no later than the scheduled redemption date, sufficient moneys to redeem the Bonds have not been deposited with the Trustee. In the event that the Trustee does not receive sufficient funds by the scheduled optional redemption date to so redeem the Bonds to be optionally redeemed, such event shall not constitute an Event of Default; the Trustee shall send written notice to the Owners to the effect that the redemption did not occur as anticipated, and the Bonds for which notice of optional redemption was given shall remain Outstanding for all purposes of this Indenture. Notice of redemption of Bonds shall be given by the Trustee, at the expense of the District, for and on behalf of the District. Failure by the Trustee to mail notice of redemption pursuant to this Section 4.03 to the Owners shall not affect the sufficiency of the proceedings for redemption. Section 4.04. Partial Redemption of Bonds. Upon surrender of any Bond redeemed in part only, the District shall execute and the Trustee shall authenticate and deliver to the Owner thereof, at the expense of the District, a new Bond or Bonds of authorized denominations, equal in aggregate principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond surrendered. Section 4.05. Effect of Redemption. Notice of redemption having been duly given as aforesaid, and receipt of moneys for payment of the redemption price of, together with interest accrued to the redemption date on, the Bonds (or portions thereof) so called for redemption being held by the Trustee, on the redemption date designated in such notice, the Bonds (or portions thereof) so called for redemption shall become due and payable at the redemption price specified in such notice as provided in this Indenture and interest accrued thereon to the redemption date, interest on the Bonds so called for redemption shall cease to accrue, said Bonds (or portions thereof) shall cease to be entitled to any benefit or security under this Indenture, and the Owners shall have no rights in respect thereof except to receive payment of said redemption price and accrued interest. All Bonds redeemed pursuant to the provisions of this Article IV shall be canceled upon surrender of such Bonds and delivered to or upon the Order of the District. -19- ARTICLE V OBLIGATION OF THE DISTRICT; PLEDGE OF PARCEL TAX REVENUES Section 5.01. Obligation of the District. The District’s obligation to pay the principal, sinking fund installments of, redemption premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt shall be an obligation payable from Parcel Tax Revenues. The obligation of the District to pay the principal or sinking fund installments of, redemption premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt from Parcel Tax Revenues, to apply Parcel Tax Revenues and to perform and observe the other agreements contained in this Indenture and the District’s pledge of Parcel Tax Revenues as herein provided shall be absolute and unconditional and shall not be subject to any defense or any right of set- off, counterclaim or recoupment arising out of any breach of the District or the Trustee of any obligation to the District, whether under this Indenture or otherwise, or out of indebtedness or liability at any time owing to the District by the Trustee. Until such time as all of the principal or sinking fund installments of and interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt shall have been fully paid or redeemed, the District (a) will not suspend, abate, or discontinue any payments provided for in Section 5.02 of this Indenture, and (b) will perform and observe all other agreements contained in this Indenture, and (c) will not terminate this Indenture for any cause, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, any change in the tax or other laws of the United States of America or of the State or any political subdivision of either thereof, any failure of the Trustee to perform and observe any agreement, whether express or implied, or any duty, liability or obligation arising out of or connected with this Indenture. Section 5.02. Pledge of Parcel Tax Revenues; Transfer to Pay the Principal or Sinking Fund Installments of and Interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt; Release from Lien. (a) Pledge of Parcel Tax Revenues. The District hereby irrevocably and unconditionally agrees that the payment of the principal or sinking fund installments of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt shall be secured by a pledge, charge and first and prior lien upon Parcel Tax Revenues and Parcel Tax Revenues sufficient to pay the principal or sinking fund installments of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt as the same shall become due and payable are hereby pledged, charged, assigned, transferred and set over by the District to the Trustee for the purpose of securing payment of the principal or sinking fund installments of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt. The Parcel Tax Revenues shall constitute a trust fund for the security and payment of the principal or sinking fund installments of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds held for the benefit of the Owners or held for the benefit of the owners of any Parity Debt. (b) Transfer to Pay the Principal or Sinking Fund Installments of and Interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt. In order to provide for the payment of the principal or sinking fund installments of, premium, if any, and interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt when due, the District shall direct the County, so long as the Bonds are Outstanding and any Parity Debt is outstanding, to transfer to the Trustee, as collected by the County, all Parcel Tax Revenues. With respect to the Bonds, the Trustee shall deposit into the Debt Service Fund from Parcel Tax Revenues, which is hereby created, the amount of principal of and interest on the Bonds coming due on the next succeeding Interest Payment Date. With respect to any Parity Debt, the Trustee shall deposit in the debt service fund or similar fund or account established for such Parity Debt, from Parcel Tax Revenues, the amount of principal or sinking fund installment and interest on such Parity Debt coming due on the next succeeding Interest -20- Payment Date. Should the District receive any Parcel Tax Revenues from the County, such Parcel Tax Revenues shall be held by the District in trust for the Owners and the District shall immediately transfer such Parcel Tax Revenues to the Trustee. (c) Release from Lien. Following the deposits to the Debt Service Fund as described above, all remaining Parcel Tax Revenues shall be released from the lien of this Indenture and shall be transferred by the Trustee to the District. Amounts transferred by the Trustee to the District shall be available for any lawful purpose of the District. (d) No Prior Lien. The District has not heretofore made a pledge of, granted a lien on or security interest in, or made an assignment or sale of the Parcel Tax Revenues that ranks on a parity with or prior to the pledge granted under this Indenture other than with respect to the 2018 Bonds. The District will not hereafter make or suffer to exist any pledge or assignment of, lien on, or security interest in the Parcel Tax Revenues that ranks prior to or on a parity with the pledge granted under this Indenture, except as expressly permitted under this Indenture. Section 5.03. Application of Moneys. All amounts in the Debt Service Fund shall be used and withdrawn by the Trustee solely for the purpose of paying principal or sinking fund installments of, and interest on the Bonds as the same shall become due and payable, in accordance with the provisions of Article II of this Indenture. Section 5.04. Limitations on Future Obligations Secured by Parcel Tax Revenues. (a) No Obligations Superior to the Bonds. In order to protect the availability of the Parcel Tax Revenues and the security for the principal or sinking fund installments of and interest on the Bonds and any Parity Debt, the District hereby agrees that the District shall not, so long as any Bonds or any Parity Debt are outstanding, issue or incur any obligations payable from Parcel Tax Revenues superior to its payment obligations with respect to the Bonds or such Parity Debt. (b) Parity Debt. The District further covenants that, except for obligations issued or incurred to redeem the Bonds or any Parity Debt in full, the District shall not issue or incur any Parity Debt unless it shall have received the prior written consent of the Owners of not less than 80% of the Bonds Outstanding. (c) No Limitation on Obligations Secured by Revenues Other Than Parcel Tax Revenues. Nothing in this Indenture shall limit the District from issuing or incurring obligations payable from revenues or other moneys of the District other than Parcel Tax Revenues. Any provision of this Indenture that provides for the payment of amounts from “other available moneys of the District” or similar terms shall be subject, in all cases, to prior claims on such moneys. (d) Pro Rata Application of Parcel Tax Revenues. If, at any time, there is a deficiency in Parcel Tax Revenues available to pay the principal or sinking fund installments of and interest on the Bonds and any amounts due with respect to Parity Debt, available Parcel Tax Revenues shall be applied on a pro rata basis to the payment of such principal or sinking fund installments of and interest on the Bonds and to the payment of amounts with respect to such Parity Debt then due. Section 5.05. Additional Payments In addition to the principal or sinking fund installments of and interest on the Bonds, the District shall pay when due, from Parcel Tax Revenues, all costs and expenses incurred by the District to comply with the provisions of this Indenture, including, without limitation, compensation due to the Trustee for its fees, costs and -21- expenses incurred under this Indenture and all costs and expenses of attorneys, auditors and accountants. Section 5.06. Investment of Moneys in Funds and Accounts. All moneys in any of the funds and accounts held by the Trustee and established pursuant to this Indenture shall be invested by the Trustee, upon Request of the District, solely in Permitted Investments. Permitted Investments may be purchased at such prices as the Trustee may be directed by the District. All Permitted Investments shall be acquired subject to the limitations set forth in Section 5.07 of this Indenture, the limitations as to maturities hereinafter in this Section 5.06 set forth and such additional limitations or requirements consistent with the foregoing as may be established by Request of the District. In the absence of any Request of the District to invest, the Trustee shall invest in those Permitted Investments described in clause (d) of the definition thereof. Moneys in all funds and accounts under this Indenture shall be invested in Permitted Investments maturing not later than the date on which it is estimated that such moneys will be required by the Trustee. All interest, profits and other income received from the investment of moneys in any fund or account under this Indenture shall be deposited when received in the Debt Service Fund. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this paragraph, an amount of interest received with respect to any Permitted Investment equal to the amount of accrued interest, if any, paid as part of the purchase price of such Permitted Investment shall be credited to the fund or account from which such accrued interest was paid. The Trustee may commingle any of the funds or accounts established pursuant to this Indenture into a separate fund or funds for investment purposes only, provided that all funds or accounts held by the Trustee under this Indenture shall be accounted for separately as required by this Indenture. The Trustee may act as principal or agent in the making or disposing of any investment. The Trustee may sell, or present for redemption, any Permitted Investments so purchased whenever it shall be necessary to provide moneys to meet any required payment, transfer, withdrawal or disbursement from the fund or account to which such Permitted Investment is credited, and the Trustee shall not be liable or responsible for any loss resulting from such investment. The District acknowledges that, to the extent regulations of the Comptroller of the Currency or other applicable regulatory entity grant the District the right to receive brokerage confirmations of security transactions as they occur, the District specifically waives receipt of such confirmations to the extent permitted by law. The Trustee will furnish the District monthly cash transaction statements which shall include detail for all investment transactions made by the Trustee under this Indenture. The Trustee or any of its affiliates may act as sponsor, advisor or manager in connection with any investments made by the Trustee under this Indenture. Section 5.07. Acquisition, Disposition and Valuation of Investments by the District. The District covenants that all investments of amounts deposited in any fund or account created by or pursuant to this Indenture, or otherwise containing gross proceeds of the Bonds (within the meaning of section 148 of the Code) shall be acquired, disposed of, and valued at fair market value. In making any valuations of investments under this Indenture, the Trustee may utilize and rely upon securities pricing services, including those within its regular accounting system. Section 5.08. Statutory Lien. The Lien Statute imposes a lien on the Parcel Tax Revenues to secure the District's obligations under this Indenture, under the indenture authorizing the issuance of the 2018 Bonds and any Parity Debt issued or incurred to refund the Bonds or the -22- 2018 Bonds. Pursuant to the Lien Statute, the Parcel Tax Revenues are immediately subject to such lien, and the lien immediately attaches to the Parcel Tax Revenues and is effective, binding, and enforceable against the District, its successors, purchasers of the Parcel Tax Revenues, creditors, and all others asserting rights therein, irrespective of whether those parties have notice of the lien and without the need for any physical delivery, recordation, filing, or further act. -23- ARTICLE VI DISTRICT COVENANTS Section 6.01. Maintenance of Levy and Collection of the Parcel Tax. The District shall take all actions required by law, by the County or by the State in order to have the Parcel Tax levied and collected each tax year and to take all actions to enforce collection of the Parcel Tax and the remittance of the Parcel Tax Revenues to the Trustee so long as any Bonds or any Parity Debt are Outstanding. Section 6.02. Waiver of Laws. The District shall not at any time insist upon or plead in any manner whatsoever, or claim or take the benefit or advantage of, any stay or extension law relating to the payment of debt service on the Bonds now or at any time hereafter in force that may affect the covenants and agreements contained in this Indenture or in the Bonds, and all benefit or advantage of any such law or laws is hereby expressly waived by the District to the extent permitted by law. Section 6.02. No Arbitrage. The District shall not take, or permit or suffer to be taken by the Trustee or otherwise, any action with respect to the proceeds of the Bonds which, if such action had been reasonably expected to have been taken, or had been deliberately and intentionally taken, on the date of conversion of interest on the Bonds to the Tax-exempt Rate would have caused the Bonds to be “arbitrage bonds” within the meaning of section 148 of the Code. Section 6.03. Private Activity Bond Limitation. The District shall assure that the proceeds of the Bonds are not so used as to cause the Bonds to satisfy the private business tests of section 141(b) of the Code or the private loan financing test of section 141(c) of the Code. Section 6.04. Federal Guarantee Prohibition. The District shall not take any action or permit or suffer any action to be taken if the result of the same would be to cause any of the Bonds to be “federally guaranteed” within the meaning of section 149(b) of the Code. Section 6.05. Rebate Requirement. The District shall take any and all actions necessary to assure compliance with section 148(f) of the Code, relating to the rebate of excess investment earnings, if any, to the federal government, to the extent that such section is applicable to the Bonds. Section 6.06. Maintenance of Tax-Exemption. The District shall take all actions necessary to assure the exclusion of interest on the Bonds after conversion of interest on the Bonds to the Tax-exempt Rate from the gross income of the Owners to the same extent as such interest is permitted to be excluded from gross income under the Code as in effect on the date of conversion of interest on the Bonds to the Tax-exempt Rate. Section 6.07. Further Assurances. The District will adopt, make, execute and deliver any and all such further resolutions, instruments and assurances as may be reasonably necessary or proper to carry out the intention or to facilitate the performance of this Indenture, and for the better assuring and confirming unto the Owners the rights and benefits provided in this Indenture. Section 6.08. Bankruptcy Plan. The District shall continue to take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the bankruptcy plan approved on January 3, 2018. -24- ARTICLE VII REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE DISTRICT Section 7.01. Representations and Warranties of the District. The District makes the following representations and warranties to the Trustee that as of the date of the execution of this Indenture: (a) The District is a local health care district duly organized and existing under the laws of the State, has full legal right, power and authority to enter into this Indenture and the Escrow Agreement and to carry out and consummate all transactions contemplated by this Indenture and the Escrow Agreement, and by proper corporate action has duly authorized the execution and delivery of this Indenture and the Escrow Agreement. (b) The officers of the District executing this Indenture and the Escrow Agreement are duly and properly in office and fully authorized to execute the same. (c) This Indenture and the Escrow Agreement have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the District, and, if executed by the other parties thereto, constitute the legal, valid and binding agreements of the District enforceable in accordance with their respective terms; except, in all cases, as may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratorium and other similar laws affecting creditors’ rights generally and to the application of equitable principles if equitable remedies are sought. (d) The execution and delivery of this Indenture and the Escrow Agreement, the consummation of the transactions herein contemplated and the fulfillment of or compliance with the terms and conditions hereof and thereof will not in any material respect conflict with or constitute a violation or breach of or default (with due notice or the passage of time or both) to the knowledge of the District, after reasonable inquiry and investigation, any applicable law or administrative rule or regulation, or any applicable court or administrative decree or order, or any indenture, trust agreement, mortgage, deed of trust, loan agreement, lease, contract or other agreement or instrument to which the District is a party or by which it or its properties are otherwise subject or bound, or result in the creation or imposition of any prohibited lien, charge or encumbrance of any nature whatsoever upon any of the property or assets of the District. (e) No consent or approval of any trustee, holder of any indebtedness of the District or any other Person, and no consent, permission, authorization, order or license of, or filing or registration with, any governmental authority is necessary in connection with the execution and delivery of this Indenture and the Escrow Agreement, the consummation of any transaction herein and therein contemplated, or the fulfillment of or compliance with the terms and conditions of this Indenture, except as have been obtained or made and as are in full force and effect. (f) There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation, before or by any court or federal, state, municipal or other governmental authority, pending, or to the knowledge of the District, after reasonable inquiry and investigation, threatened against or affecting the District or the assets, properties or operations of the District which, if determined adversely to the District or its interests, could have a material adverse effect upon the consummation of the transactions contemplated by or the fulfillment or compliance with the terms and conditions of or the validity or enforceability of this Indenture or the Escrow Agreement or upon the financial condition, assets, properties or operations of the District, and the District is not in default (and no event has occurred and is continuing which with the giving of notice or the passage of time -25- or both would constitute a default) with respect to any order or decree of any court or any order, regulation or express demand of any federal, state, municipal or other governmental authority which default might have consequences that would materially and adversely affect the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Indenture or the Escrow Agreement or the financial condition, assets, properties or operations of the District or its properties. (g) The audited financial statements of the District at December 31, 2018, for the year ended on such date fairly present the financial position of the District at December 31, 2018, and the results of operations for the year ended on such date, with such exceptions as may be disclosed therein, and since December 31, 2018, there has been no material adverse change in the financial condition or results of operations of the District or otherwise. (h) No information, exhibit or report furnished by the District in connection with the execution of this Indenture contains any untrue statement of a material fact or omits to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. -26- ARTICLE VIII PARTICULAR COVENANTS Section 8.01. Punctual Payment. The District shall punctually pay or cause to be paid the principal or sinking fund installments of, and interest to become due in respect of all the Bonds, in strict conformity with the terms of the Bonds and of this Indenture, according to the true intent and meaning thereof. Section 8.02. Extension of Payment of Bonds. The District shall not directly or indirectly extend or assent to the extension of the maturity of any of the Bonds or the time of payment of any or claims for interest by the purchase or funding of such Bonds or claims for interest or by any other arrangement and in case the maturity of any of the Bonds or the time of payment of any such claims for interest shall be extended, such Bonds or claims for interest shall not be entitled, in case of any default under this Indenture, to the benefits of this Indenture, except subject to the prior payment in full of the principal all of the Bonds then Outstanding and of all claims for interest thereon which shall not have been so extended. Nothing in this Section 8.02 shall be deemed to limit the right of the District to issue bonds for the purpose of refunding any Outstanding Bonds, and such issuance shall not be deemed to constitute an extension of maturity of Bonds. Section 8.03. Accounting Records and Financial Statements Relating to the Bonds. The Trustee shall at all times keep, or cause to be kept, proper books of record and account, prepared in accordance with the Trustee’s accounting practices for books of record and account relating to similar trust accounts, in which sufficient entries shall be made of all transactions relating to the proceeds of Bonds and all funds and accounts established pursuant to this Indenture and held by the Trustee. Such books of record and account and any other commercially reasonable requested information shall be available for inspection by the District and the Owners, or their agents or representatives duly authorized in writing, upon prior written notice and at any time during regular business hours and under reasonable circumstances. Section 8.04. Information to be provided to the Owners. (a) The District shall provide the Owners with the following documentation and information within nine months of the end of the District’s Fiscal Year: (i) The audited financial statements of the District for the preceding Fiscal Year, if available, or the audited financial statements of the County if the District's financial statements are combined or consolidated Into the County's audited financial statements and shown in summary form as supplemental Information; (ii) The current year assessed valuation of real property within the District; (iii) Levy, receipts and delinquency of the previously fiscal year Parcel Tax Revenues and ad valorem taxes for the preceding Fiscal Year; and (iv) A certification from the District that it is not aware of any default or Event of Default. (b) The District shall provide the Owners with its annual approved operating budget within one month after its adoption. -27- (c) The District will provide the Owners with any information or documentation pertaining to the bankruptcy plan approved on January 3, 2018, upon receipt. (d) The District shall furnish, at an Owner’s request such additional information that Owner may from time to time reasonably request. Section 8.05. Additional Rights of the Original Purchasers. The following provisions shall apply so long as the Original Purchasers owns the Bonds: (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Indenture, the Original Purchasers shall have the right to consent to the appointment of a successor Trustee appointed by the District after the resignation or removal of the Trustee. (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Indenture, the Original Purchasers shall have the right to consent to any amendment to this Indenture. (c) The District shall inform the Original Purchasers promptly upon the occurrence of an Event of Default. (d) The Original Purchasers are hereby expressly made third party beneficiaries of this Indenture. (e) The Trustee or the District, as applicable, shall notify the Original Purchasers of any failure of the District to provide relevant notices, certificates or other similar documents. (f) The District shall pay or reimburse the Original Purchasers for any and all charges, fees, costs and expenses that the Original Purchasers may reasonably pay or incur in connection with the following: (i) the administration, enforcement, defense, or preservation of any rights or security hereunder or under the Indenture; (ii) the pursuit of any remedies hereunder, under the Indenture, or otherwise afforded by law or equity; (iii) any amendment, waiver, or other action with respect to or related to this Indenture whether or not executed or completed; (iv) the violation by the District of any law, rule, or regulation or any judgment, order or decree applicable to it; or (v) any litigation or other dispute in connection with this Indenture. Section 8.06. Waiver of Laws. The District shall not at any time insist upon or plead in any manner whatsoever, or claim or take the benefit or advantage of, any stay or extension law now or at any time hereafter in force that may affect the covenants and agreements contained in this Indenture or in the Bonds, and all benefit or advantage of any such law or laws is hereby expressly waived by the District to the extent permitted by law. -28- ARTICLE IX EVENTS OF DEFAULT AND REMEDIES OF OWNERS Section 9.01. Events of Default. The following events shall be Events of Default: (a) default in the due and punctual payment of the principal or sinking fund installment of any Bond when and as the same shall become due and payable, whether at maturity as therein expressed, by proceedings for redemption, by declaration or otherwise; (b) default in the due and punctual payment of any installment of interest on any Bond when and as such interest installment shall become due and payable; (c) if any representation or warranty made by the District in this Indenture or in any document, instrument or certificate furnishes to the Trustee or to the Original Purchasers in connection with the execution and delivery of the Bonds shall at any time prove to have been incorrect in any material respect as of the time made; (d) if the District shall fail to observe or perform any covenant, condition, agreement or provision in this Indenture on its part to be observed or performed (including but not limited to compliance with the bankruptcy plan approved on January 3, 2018), other than as referred to in subsection (a), (b) or (c) of this Section 9.01, or shall breach any warranty by the District herein contained, for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice, specifying such failure or breach and requesting that it be remedied, has been given to the District by the Trustee; except that, if such failure or breach can be remedied but not within such thirty (30) day period and if the District has taken all action reasonably possible to remedy such failure or breach within such thirty (30) day period, such failure or breach shall not become an Event of Default for so long as the District shall diligently proceed to remedy the same in accordance with and subject to any directions or limitations of time established by the Trustee and the Owners and provided that such extended period shall not exceed an additional thirty (30) days, unless a longer period is permitted by the Owners; (e) if any default shall exist under any agreement governing any Parity Debt and such default shall continue beyond the grace period, if any, provided for with respect to such default, or if the debt service payments on any Indebtedness which is not Parity Debt are accelerated; (f) if a final judgment for the payment of money in excess of one million dollars ($1,000,000) (not covered by insurance) shall be rendered against the District and the same shall remain undischarged for a period of sixty (60) days during which the execution of such judgment shall not be effectively stayed; (g) if the District files a petition in voluntary bankruptcy, for the composition of its affairs or for its corporate reorganization under any state or federal bankruptcy or insolvency law, or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or admits in writing to its insolvency or inability to pay debts as they mature, or consents in writing to the appointment of a trustee or receiver for itself; (h) if a court of competent jurisdiction shall enter an order, judgment or decree declaring the District an insolvent or adjudging it bankrupt, or appointing a trustee or receiver of the District, or approving a petition filed against the District seeking reorganization of the District under any applicable bankruptcy or insolvency law or statute of the United States of America or -29- any state thereof, and such order, judgment or decree shall not be vacated or set aside or stayed within sixty (60) days from the date of the entry thereof; or (i) if, under the provisions of any other law for the relief or aid of debtors, any court of competent jurisdiction shall assume custody or control of the District, and such custody or control shall not be terminated within sixty (60) days from the date of assumption of such custody or control. Section 9.02. Acceleration of Maturities. If an Event of Default shall occur, then, and in each and every such case during the continuance of such Event of Default, at the option of Owners of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding as provided in Section 2.02, the Default Rate shall apply and the Trustee or the Owners shall be entitled, upon notice in writing to the District, to declare the principal of all of the Bonds then Outstanding, and the interest accrued thereon, to be due and payable immediately, and upon any such declaration the same shall become and shall be immediately due and payable, anything in this Indenture or in the Bonds contained to the contrary notwithstanding. Any such declaration, however, is subject to the condition that if, at any time after such declaration and before any judgment or decree for the payment of the moneys due shall have been obtained or entered, the District shall deposit with the Trustee a sum sufficient to pay all the principal or sinking fund installments of and installments of interest on the Bonds payment of which is overdue, with interest then accrued on such overdue principal (at the Default Rate if applicable in accordance with Sections 2.02 and 9.02), and the reasonable charges and expenses of Trustee and the Owners including reasonable and actual attorneys’ fees and collection costs), and any and all other defaults known to the Trustee (other than in the payment of principal or sinking fund installments of and interest on the Bonds due and payable solely by reason of such declaration) shall have been made good or cured to the satisfaction of the Trustee or provision deemed by the Trustee to be adequate shall have been made therefor, then, and in every such case, the Owners, by written notice to the District and the Trustee, or the Trustee if such declaration was made by the Trustee, may, on behalf of the Owners, rescind and annul such declaration and its consequences and waive such default; but no such rescission and annulment shall extend to or shall affect any subsequent default, or shall impair or exhaust any right or power consequent thereon. Section 9.03. Application of Parcel Tax Revenues and Other Funds After Default. If an Event of Default shall occur and be continuing, without the requirement of an acceleration, all Parcel Tax Revenues and any other funds then held or thereafter received by the Trustee under any of the provisions of this Indenture (subject to Sections 5.01 and 14.11 of this Indenture) shall be applied by the Trustee as follows and in the following order: (a) To the payment of any reasonable expenses necessary in the opinion of the Trustee and the Owners to protect the interests of the Owners after payment of the fees and expenses (including those previously outstanding) of the Trustee and the Owners (including the reasonable and actual fees and disbursements of counsel and accountants, and collection costs) incurred in and about the performance of its powers and duties under this Indenture and/or the exercise of remedies under this Indenture; (b) To the payment of the principal or sinking fund installments of interest then due on the Bonds subject to the provisions of this Indenture (including Section 9.02), as follows: (i) Unless the principal of all of the Bonds shall have become or have been declared due and payable, -30- First: To the payment to the persons entitled thereto of all installments of interest then due in the order of the maturity of such installments, and, if the amount available shall not be sufficient to pay in full any installment or installments maturing on the same date, then to the payment thereof ratably, according to the amounts due thereon, to the persons entitled thereto, without any discrimination or preference; and Second: To the payment to the persons entitled thereto of the unpaid principal or sinking fund installments of any Bonds which shall have become due, whether at maturity or by call for redemption, in the order of their due dates, with interest on the overdue principal at the rate borne by the respective Bonds, and, if the amount available shall not be sufficient to pay in full all amounts then due on any date, together with such interest, then to the payment thereof ratably, according to the amounts of principal or sinking fund installments due on such date to the persons entitled thereto, without any discrimination or preference. (ii) If the principal of all of the Bonds shall have become or have been declared due and payable, to the payment of the principal or sinking fund installments of and interest then due and unpaid upon the Bonds, with interest on the overdue principal at the Default Rate, and, if the amount available shall not be sufficient to pay in full the whole amount so due and unpaid, then to the payment thereof ratably, without preference or priority of principal over interest, or of interest over principal, or of any installment of interest over any other installment of interest, or of any Bond over any other Bond, according to the amounts due respectively for principal and interest, to the persons entitled thereto without any discrimination or preference. Section 9.04. Trustee to Represent Owners. The Trustee is hereby irrevocably appointed (and any successive Owner, by taking and holding the same, shall be conclusively deemed to have so appointed the Trustee) as trustee and true and lawful attorney-in-fact of the Owners for the purpose of exercising and prosecuting on their behalf such rights and remedies as may be available to the Owners under the provisions of the Bonds, this Indenture, the Law, and applicable provisions of any other law. Upon the occurrence and continuance of an Event of Default or other occasion giving rise to a right in the Trustee to represent the Owners, the Trustee in its discretion may, and upon the written request of the Owners of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding, and upon being indemnified to its satisfaction therefor, shall, proceed to protect or enforce its rights or the rights of the Owners under this Indenture by such appropriate action, suit, mandamus or other proceedings as it shall deem most effectual to protect and enforce any such right, at law or in equity, either for the specific performance of any covenant or agreement contained in this Indenture, or in aid of the execution of any power herein granted, or for the enforcement of any other appropriate legal or equitable right or remedy vested in the Trustee or in the Owners under this Indenture, the Law or any other law related hereto; and upon instituting such proceeding, the Trustee shall be entitled, as a matter of right, to the appointment of a receiver of the Parcel Tax Revenues and any other available moneys of the District under this Indenture, pending such proceedings. If the Trustee shall receive conflicting directions from two or more groups, the Trustee shall have the right not to follow any such instructions and shall be deemed entitled to indemnification under this Indenture. All rights of action under this Indenture or the Bonds or otherwise may be prosecuted and enforced by the Trustee without the possession of any of the Bonds or the production thereof in any proceeding relating thereto, and any such suit, action or proceeding instituted by the Trustee shall be brought in the name of the Trustee -31- for the benefit and protection of the Owners, subject to the provisions of this Indenture (including Section 9.02). Section 9.05. Owners’ Direction of Proceedings. The Owners of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding shall have the right, by an instrument or concurrent instruments in writing executed and delivered to the Trustee, to direct the method of conducting all remedial proceedings taken by the Trustee under this Indenture, provided that such direction shall not (a) be otherwise than in accordance with law and the provisions of this Indenture or (b) subject the Trustee to personal liability. Section 9.06. Limitation on Owners’ Right to Sue. The Owners shall have no right to institute any suit, action or proceeding at law or in equity, for the protection or enforcement of any right or remedy under this Indenture, the Law or any other applicable law with respect to such Bond, unless (a) the Owners shall have given to the Trustee written notice of the occurrence of an Event of Default; (b) the Owners shall have made written request upon the Trustee to exercise the powers hereinbefore granted or to institute such suit, action or proceeding in its own name; (c) the Owners shall have tendered to the Trustee reasonable indemnity against the costs, expenses and liabilities to be incurred in compliance with such request; (d) the Trustee shall have refused or omitted to comply with such request for a period of thirty (30) days after such written request shall have been received by, and said tender of indemnity shall have been made to, the Trustee; and (e) no direction inconsistent with such written request has been given to the Trustee during such thirty (30) day period by the Owners of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding. Such notification, request, tender of indemnity and refusal or omission are hereby declared, in every case, to be conditions precedent to the exercise by the Owners of Bonds of any remedy under this Indenture or under law; it being understood and intended that the Owners shall have no right in any manner whatever by his, her or their action to affect, disturb or prejudice the security of this Indenture or the rights of the Owners, or to enforce any right under this Indenture, the Law or other applicable law with respect to the Bonds, except in the manner herein provided, and that all proceedings at law or in equity to enforce any such right shall be instituted, had and maintained in the manner herein provided and for the benefit and protection of the Owners, subject to the provisions of this Indenture (including Section 9.02). Section 9.07. Absolute Obligation of District. Nothing in Section 9.06 of this Indenture or in any other provision of this Indenture, or in the Bonds, contained shall affect or impair the obligation of the District, which is absolute and unconditional to pay the principal or sinking fund installments of and interest on the Bonds to the Owners at their respective dates of maturity, or upon call for redemption, as herein provided, but only out of the Parcel Tax Revenues, or affect or impair the right of the Owners, which is also absolute and unconditional, to enforce such payment by virtue of the contract embodied in the Bonds. Section 9.08. Termination of Proceedings. In case any proceedings taken by the Trustee or the Owners on account of any Event of Default shall have been discontinued or abandoned for any reason or shall have been determined adversely to the Trustee or the Owners, then in every such case the District, the Trustee and the Owners, subject to any determination in such proceedings, shall be restored to their former positions and rights under this Indenture, severally and respectively, and all rights, remedies, powers and duties of the District, the Trustee and the Owners shall continue as though no such proceedings had been taken. Section 9.09. Remedies Not Exclusive. No remedy herein conferred upon or reserved to the Trustee or to the Owners is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy or remedies, and each and every such remedy, to the extent permitted by law or in equity, shall be cumulative -32- and in addition to any other remedy given under this Indenture or now or hereafter existing at law or in equity or otherwise, including, without limitation, the right to seek mandamus and special performance. Section 9.10. No Waiver of Default. No delay or omission of the Trustee or of the Owners to exercise any right or power arising upon the occurrence of any default shall impair any such right or power or shall be construed to be a waiver of any such default or an acquiescence therein; and every power and remedy given by this Indenture to the Trustee or to the Owners of the Bonds may be exercised from time to time and as often as may be deemed expedient. Section 9.11. Parties Interested Herein. Nothing in this Indenture expressed or implied is intended or shall be construed to confer upon, or to give to, any person or entity, other than the District, the Trustee, their officers, employees and agents, and the Owners any right, remedy or claim under or by reason of this Indenture, or any covenant, condition or stipulation of this Indenture, and all covenants, stipulations, promises and agreements in this Indenture contained by and on behalf of the District shall be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the District, the Trustee, their officers, employees and agents, and the Owners. -33- ARTICLE X THE TRUSTEE Section 10.01. Duties, Immunities and Liabilities of Trustee. (a) The Trustee shall, prior to an Event of Default, and after the curing or waiver of all Events of Default which may have occurred, perform such duties and only such duties as are specifically set forth in this Indenture and no implied duties shall be read into this Indenture. The Trustee shall, during the existence of any Event of Default (which has not been cured or waived), exercise such of the rights and powers vested in it by this Indenture, and use the same degree of care and skill in their exercise, as a prudent person would exercise or use under the circumstances in the conduct of his or her own affairs. (b) The District may remove the Trustee at any time unless an Event of Default shall have occurred and then be continuing, and shall remove the Trustee if at any time requested to do so by an instrument or concurrent instruments in writing signed by the Owners of not less than a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding (or their attorneys duly authorized in writing) or if at any time the Trustee shall cease to be eligible in accordance with subsection (e) of this Section 10.01, or shall become incapable of acting, or shall be adjudged a bankrupt or insolvent or a receiver of the Trustee or its property shall be appointed, or any public officer shall take control or charge of the Trustee or of its property or affairs for the purpose of rehabilitation, conservation or liquidation, in each case by giving written notice of such removal to the Trustee, and thereupon shall appoint a successor Trustee by an instrument in writing. (c) The Trustee may at any time resign by giving written notice of such resignation to the District and by giving the Owners notice of such resignation by mail at the addresses shown on the registration books maintained by the Trustee. Upon receiving such notice of resignation, the District shall promptly appoint a successor Trustee by an instrument in writing. (d) Any removal or resignation of the Trustee and appointment of a successor Trustee shall become effective upon acceptance of appointment by the successor Trustee. If no successor Trustee shall have been appointed and have accepted appointment within forty-five (45) days of giving notice of removal or notice of resignation as aforesaid, the resigning Trustee or the Owners may petition, at the expense of the District, any federal court or any other court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a successor Trustee, and such court may thereupon, after such notice (if any) as it may deem proper, (a) order the District to appoint a successor Trustee, or (b) appoint such successor Trustee. Any successor Trustee appointed under this Indenture, shall signify its acceptance of such appointment by executing and delivering to the District and to its predecessor Trustee a written acceptance thereof, and thereupon such successor Trustee, without any further act, deed or conveyance, shall become vested with all the moneys, estates, properties, rights, powers, trusts, duties and obligations of such predecessor Trustee, with like effect as if originally named Trustee herein; but, nevertheless at the Request of the District or the request of the successor Trustee, such predecessor Trustee shall execute and deliver any and all instruments of conveyance or further assurance and do such other things as may reasonably be required for more fully and certainly vesting in and confirming to such successor Trustee all the right, title and interest of such predecessor Trustee in and to any property held by it under this Indenture and shall pay over, transfer, assign and deliver to the successor Trustee any money or other property subject to the trusts and conditions herein set forth. Upon request of the successor Trustee, the District shall execute and deliver any and all instruments as may be reasonably required for more fully and -34- certainly vesting in and confirming to such successor Trustee all such moneys, estates, properties, rights, powers, trusts, duties and obligations. Upon acceptance of appointment by a successor Trustee as provided in this subsection, the District shall give notice of the succession of such Trustee to the trusts under this Indenture by mail to the Owners at the addresses shown on the registration books maintained by the Trustee. If the District fails to mail such notice within fifteen (15) days after acceptance of appointment by the successor Trustee, the successor Trustee shall cause such notice to be mailed at the expense of the District. The Trustee shall be paid all amounts owing to it concurrent with the receipt by the successor Trustee of the trusts of this Indenture. (e) Any Trustee appointed under the provisions of this Section 10.01 in succession to the Trustee shall be a bank, corporation or trust company having the powers of a trust company having a corporate trust office in the State, having a combined capital and surplus (or the parent holding company of which has a combined capital and surplus) of at least fifty million dollars ($50,000,000), and subject to supervision or examination by federal or state authority. If such bank, corporation or trust company publishes a report of condition at least annually, pursuant to law or to the requirements of any supervising or examining authority above referred to, then for the purpose of this subsection the combined capital and surplus of such bank, corporation or trust (or holding) company shall be deemed to be its combined capital and surplus as set forth in its most recent report of condition so published. In case at any time the Trustee shall cease to be eligible in accordance with the provisions of this subsection (e), the Trustee shall resign immediately in the manner and with the effect specified in this Section 10.01. Section 10.02. Merger or Consolidation. Any company into which the Trustee may be merged or converted or with which it may be consolidated or any company resulting from any merger, conversion or consolidation to which it shall be a party or any company to which the Trustee may sell or transfer all or substantially all of its corporate trust business, provided such company shall be eligible under subsection (e) of Section 10.01 of this Indenture, shall be the successor to such Trustee without the execution or filing of any paper or any further act, anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding. Section 10.03. Liability of Trustee. The recitals of facts in this Indenture and in the Bonds contained shall be taken as statements of the District, and the Trustee assumes no responsibility for the correctness of the same, and makes no representations as to the validity or sufficiency of this Indenture or of the Bonds, and shall incur no responsibility or liability in respect thereof, other than in connection with the express duties or obligations in this Indenture or in the Bonds assigned to or imposed upon it. The Trustee shall, however, be responsible for its representations contained in its certificate of authentication on the Bonds. The Trustee shall not be liable in connection with the performance of its duties under this Indenture, except for its own negligence or willful misconduct. The Trustee may become the Owner of Bonds with the same rights it would have if it were not the Trustee, and, to the extent permitted by law, may act as depository for and permit any of its officers or directors to act as a member of, or in any other capacity with respect to, any committee formed to protect the rights of the Owner, whether or not such committee shall represent the Owners of a majority in principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding. The Trustee shall not be deemed to have knowledge of any Event of Default unless and until an officer at the Principal Corporate Trust Office responsible for the administration of its duties under this Indenture shall have actual knowledge thereof or the Trustee shall have received written notice thereof at the Principal Corporate Trust Office. The Trustee shall not be bound to inquire as to the performance or observance of any of the terms, conditions, covenants or agreements in this Indenture or of any of the documents executed in connection with the Bonds, or as to the existence of any default or Event of Default thereunder. The Trustee shall not be responsible for the validity or effectiveness of any collateral given or -35- held by it. As used in this Indenture, the term “actual knowledge” means the actual fact or statement of knowing, without any duty to make any investigation with regard thereto. Section 10.04. Right of Trustee to Rely on Documents. The Trustee shall be protected in acting upon any notice, resolution, request, consent, requisition, order, certificate, report, opinion, note or other paper or document believed by it to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the proper party or parties. Before the Trustee acts or refrains from acting, the Trustee may consult with counsel, who may be counsel of or to the District, with regard to legal questions, and the opinion of such counsel shall be full and complete authorization and protection in respect of any action taken or suffered by it under this Indenture in good faith and in accord therewith. Whenever in the administration of the trusts imposed upon it by this Indenture the Trustee shall deem it necessary or desirable that a matter be proved or established prior to taking or suffering any action under this Indenture, such matter (unless other evidence in respect thereof be herein specifically prescribed) may be deemed to be conclusively proved and established by a Certificate of the District, and such Certificate shall be full warrant to the Trustee for any action taken or suffered in good faith under the provisions of this Indenture in reliance upon such Certificate, but in its discretion the Trustee may, in lieu thereof, accept other evidence of such matter or may require such additional evidence as to it may seem reasonable. The Trustee shall have no responsibility with respect to any information, statement or any other disclosure material prepared or distributed with respect to the Bonds. Before taking any action under this Article X or Article IX of this Indenture, the Trustee may require indemnity satisfactory to the Trustee be furnished from any expenses and to protect it against any liability it may incur under this Indenture. The immunities extended to the Trustee also extend to its directors, officers, employees, attorneys, agents and receivers. The Trustee may execute any of the trusts or powers hereof and perform any of its duties through attorneys, agents and receivers and shall not be answerable for the conduct of the same if appointed by it with reasonable care. The Trustee shall not be liable for any action taken or not taken by it in accordance with the direction of a majority (or other percentage provided for in this Indenture) in aggregate principal amount of Bonds outstanding relating to the exercise of any right, power or remedy available to the Trustee. The permissive right of the Trustee to do things enumerated in this Indenture shall not be construed as a duty. No provision of this Indenture shall require the Trustee to risk or advance its own funds or otherwise incur any financial liability in the performance of its duties or the exercise of its rights under this Indenture. Section 10.05. Preservation and Inspection of Documents. All documents received by the Trustee under the provisions of this Indenture shall be retained in its possession and shall be subject at all reasonable times to the inspection of the District and the Owners, and their agents and representatives duly authorize in writing, upon prior written notice and at reasonable hours and under reasonable conditions. -36- Section 10.06. Compensation of Trustee. Absent any agreement to the contrary, the District covenants to pay to the Trustee from time to time, and the Trustee shall be entitled to, reasonable compensation for all services rendered by it in the exercise and performance of any of the powers and duties under this Indenture of the Trustee, which such compensation shall not be limited by or in regard to the compensation for a trustee of an express trust, and the District will pay or reimburse the Trustee promptly upon its request, for all reasonable expenses, disbursements and advances incurred or made by the Trustee in accordance with any of the provisions of this Indenture (including the reasonable compensation and the expenses and disbursements of its counsel and of all persons but regularly in its employ) except any such expense, disbursement or advance as may arise from its negligence or willful misconduct. Section 10.07. Indemnification. The District covenants, to the extent permitted by law, to indemnify the Trustee, its officers, directors, employees, attorneys, agents and receivers and to hold it harmless from and against any loss, liability, expenses, suits, claims or advance, including fees and expenses of counsel and other experts, incurred or made without negligence or willful misconduct on the part of the Trustee, in the exercise and performance of any of the powers and duties under this Indenture by the Trustee, including the costs and expenses of defending itself against or investigating any claim of liability arising under this Indenture. The provisions of Section 10.06 and this Section 10.07 shall survive the removal or resignation of the Trustee or the termination of this Indenture. -37- ARTICLE XI MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THIS INDENTURE Section 11.01. Amendments Permitted. (a) This Indenture and the rights and obligations of the District, the Owners of the Bonds and the Trustee may be modified or amended from time to time and at any time by a Supplemental Indenture, which the District and the Trustee may enter into with the written consent of the Owners of a majority in aggregate principal amount of the Bonds then Outstanding filed with the Trustee; provided that if such modification or amendment will, by its terms, not take effect so long as any Bonds remain Outstanding, the consent of the Owners of such Bonds shall not be required and such Bonds shall not be deemed to be Outstanding for the purpose of any calculation of Bonds Outstanding under this Section 11.01. No such modification or amendment shall (i) extend the fixed maturity of any Bond, or reduce the amount of principal thereof, or extend the time of payment or reduce the amount of any Mandatory Sinking Account Payment provided in this Indenture for the payment of any Bond, or reduce the rate of interest thereon, or extend the time of payment of interest thereon, without the consent of the Owner of each Bond so affected, or (ii) reduce the aforesaid percentage of Bonds the consent of the Owners of which is required to effect any such modification or amendment, or permit the creation of any lien on the Parcel Tax Revenues and any other available moneys of the District under this Indenture prior to or on a parity with the lien created by this Indenture, or deprive the Owners of the Bonds of the lien created by this Indenture on such Parcel Tax Revenues and other assets (except as expressly provided in this Indenture), without the consent of the Owners of all of the Bonds then Outstanding. It shall not be necessary for the consent of the Owners to approve the particular form of any Supplemental Indenture, but it shall be sufficient if such consent shall approve the substance thereof. Promptly after the adoption by the District of any Supplemental Indenture pursuant to this subsection (a), the Trustee shall mail a notice, setting forth in general terms the substance of such Supplemental Indenture to the Owners of the Bonds at the addresses shown on the registration books of the Trustee. Any failure to give such notice, or any defect therein, shall not, however, in any way impair or affect the validity of any such Supplemental Indenture. (b) This Indenture and the rights and obligations of the District, of the Trustee and of the Owners of the Bonds may also be modified or amended from time to time and at any time by a Supplemental Indenture, which the District and the Trustee may enter into without the consent of the Owners but only to the extent permitted by law and only for any one or more of the following purposes: (i) to add to the covenants and agreements of the District in this Indenture to be observed, to pledge or assign additional security for the Bonds (or any portion thereof), or to surrender any right or power herein reserved to or conferred upon the District, provided, that no such covenant, agreement, pledge, assignment or surrender shall adversely affect the interests of the Owners of the Bonds; (ii) to make such provisions for the purpose of curing any ambiguity, inconsistency or omission, or of curing or correcting any defective provision, contained in this Indenture, or in regard to matters or questions arising under this Indenture, as the District may deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with this Indenture, and which shall not adversely affect the interests of the Owners of the Bonds; -38- (iii) to modify, amend or supplement this Indenture in such manner as to permit the qualification hereof under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended, or any similar federal statute hereafter in effect and to add such other terms, conditions and provisions as may be permitted by said act or similar federal statute, and which shall not adversely affect the interests of the Owners of the Bonds; and (iv) to make such additions, deletions or modifications as may be necessary or desirable to assure exemption from federal income taxation of interest on the Bonds. (c) The Trustee may in its discretion, but shall not be obligated to, enter into any such Supplemental Indenture which materially affects the Trustee’s own rights, duties or immunities under this Indenture or otherwise. (d) Prior to entering into any Supplemental Indenture, the Trustee shall be furnished by the District with an Opinion of Counsel of recognized standing in the field of law relating to municipal bonds, to the effect that the execution and delivery of such Supplemental Indenture by the Trustee and the District (i) is in compliance with the terms and conditions hereof and (ii) will not cause interest on any Bonds Outstanding to become includable in gross income for federal income tax purposes. Section 11.02. Effect of Supplemental Indenture. From and after the time any Supplemental Indenture becomes effective pursuant to this Article XI, this Indenture shall be deemed to be modified and amended in accordance therewith, and the respective rights, duties and obligations under this Indenture of the District, the Trustee and all Owners of Bonds Outstanding shall thereafter be determined, exercised and enforced under this Indenture subject in all respects to such modification and amendment, and all the terms and conditions of any such Supplemental Indenture shall be deemed to be part of the terms and conditions of this Indenture for any and all purposes. Section 11.03. Endorsement of Bonds; Preparation of New Bonds. Bonds delivered after any Supplemental Indenture becomes effective pursuant to this Article XI may, and if the Trustee so determines shall, bear a notation by endorsement or otherwise in form approved by the District and the Trustee as to any modification or amendment provided for in such Supplemental Indenture, and, in that case, upon demand of the Owners of any Bond Outstanding at the time of such execution and presentation of his Bond for the purpose at the Principal Corporate Trust Office or at such additional offices as the Trustee may select and designate for that purpose, a suitable notation shall be made on such Bond. If the Supplemental Indenture shall so provide, new Bonds so modified as to conform, in the opinion of the District and the Trustee, to any modification or amendment contain in such Supplemental Indenture, shall be prepared and executed by the District and authenticated by the Trustee, and upon demand of the Owners of any Bonds then Outstanding shall be exchanged at the Principal Corporate Trust Office, without cost to the Owners, upon surrender for cancellation of such Bonds, in equal aggregate principal amounts of the same maturity. Section 11.04. Amendment of Particular Bonds. The provisions of this Article XI shall not prevent the Owners from accepting any amendment as to the particular Bonds held by him, provided that due notation thereof is made on such Bonds. -39- ARTICLE XII DEFEASANCE Section 12.01. Discharge of Indenture. All or a portion of the Bonds may be paid by the District in any of the following ways; provided that the District also pays or causes to be paid any other sums then due and payable under this Indenture by the District: (a) by paying or causing to be paid the principal or sinking fund installments of and interest on Bonds Outstanding, as and when the same become due and payable; (b) by depositing with the Trustee, in trust, at or before maturity, money or securities in the necessary amount (as provided in Section 12.03 of this Indenture) to pay or redeem Bonds Outstanding; or (c) by delivering to the Trustee, for cancellation by it, Bonds Outstanding. If the District shall pay all Bonds and shall also pay or cause to be paid all other sums payable under this Indenture by the District, then and in that case, at the election of the District (evidenced by a Certificate of the District, filed with the Trustee, signifying the intention of the District to discharge all such indebtedness and this Indenture), and notwithstanding that any Bonds shall not have been surrendered for payment, this Indenture and the pledge of Parcel Tax Revenues and other assets made under this Indenture and all covenants, agreements and other obligations of the District under this Indenture shall cease, terminate, become void and be completely discharged and satisfied. In such event, upon Request of the District, the Trustee shall cause an accounting for such period or periods as may be requested by the District to be prepared and filed with the District and shall execute and deliver to the District all such instruments as may be necessary or desirable to evidence such discharge and satisfaction, and the Trustee shall pay over, transfer, assign or deliver to the District all moneys or securities or other property held by it pursuant to this Indenture which are not required for the payment or redemption of Bonds not theretofore surrendered for such payment or redemption. Section 12.02. Discharge of Liability on Bonds. Upon the deposit with the Trustee, in trust, at or before maturity, of money or securities in the necessary amount (as provided in Section 12.03 of this Indenture) to pay or redeem any Outstanding Bond (whether upon or prior to its maturity or the redemption date of such Bonds), provided that, if such Bond is to be redeemed prior to maturity, notice of such redemption shall have been given as in Article IV of this Indenture provided or provision satisfactory to the Trustee shall have been made for the giving of such notice, then all liability of the District in respect of such Bond shall cease, terminate and be completely discharged, and the Owners thereof shall thereafter be entitled only to payment out of such money or securities deposited with the Trustee as aforesaid for their payment, subject, however, to the provisions of Section 12.04 of this Indenture and the continuing duties of the Trustee under this Indenture including, without limitation, the provisions of Section 2.05 and Section 2.06 of this Indenture. The District may at any time surrender to the Trustee for cancellation by it any Bonds previously issued and delivered, which the District may have acquired in any manner whatsoever, and such Bonds, upon such surrender and cancellation, shall be deemed to be paid and retired. Section 12.03. Deposit of Money or Securities with Trustee. Whenever in this Indenture it is provided or permitted that there be deposited with or held in trust by the Trustee money or -40- securities in the necessary amount to pay or redeem any Bonds, the money or securities so to be deposited or held may include money or securities held by the Trustee in the funds and accounts established pursuant to this Indenture and shall be: (a) lawful money of the United States of America in an amount equal to the principal amount of such Bonds and all unpaid interest thereon to maturity, except that, in the case of Bonds which are to be redeemed prior to maturity and in respect of which notice of such redemption shall have been given as in Article IV of this Indenture provided or provision satisfactory to the Trustee shall have been made for the giving of such notice, the amount to be deposited or held shall be the principal or sinking fund installments of such Bonds and all unpaid interest thereon to the redemption date; or (b) cash and/or Defeasance Obligations, the principal of and interest on which when due will provide money sufficient in the opinion of a certified public accountant to pay the principal or sinking fund installments of, and all unpaid interest to maturity, or to the redemption date, as the case may be, on the Bonds to be paid or redeemed, as such principal or sinking fund installments of, and interest become due, provided that, in the case of Bonds which are to be redeemed prior to the maturity thereof, notice of such redemption shall have been given as in Article IV of this Indenture provided or provision satisfactory to the Trustee shall have been made for the giving of such notice; provided, in each case, that the Trustee shall have been irrevocably instructed (by the terms of this Indenture or by Request of the District) to apply such money to the payment of such principal or sinking fund installments of, and interest with respect to such Bonds. To accomplish defeasance, the District shall cause to be delivered (i) a report of an independent firm of nationally recognized certified public accountants (“Accountant”) verifying the sufficiency of the escrow established to pay the Bonds in full on the maturity or redemption date (“Verification”), (ii) an escrow deposit agreement, and (iii) an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel to the effect that the Bonds are no longer Outstanding; each Verification and defeasance opinion shall be acceptable in form and substance to the District, and addressed, to the District and the Trustee. Section 12.04. Payment of Bonds After Discharge of Indenture. Any moneys held by the Trustee in trust for the payment of the principal or sinking fund installments of, or interest on, any Bonds and remaining unclaimed for the period which is one year less than the statutory escheat period after the principal of all of the Bonds has become due and payable (whether at maturity or upon call for redemption or by acceleration as provided in this Indenture), if such moneys were so held at such date, or the period which is one year less than the statutory escheat period after the date of deposit of such moneys if deposited after said date when all of the Bonds became due and payable, shall, be repaid to the District free from the trusts created by this Indenture, and all liability of the Trustee with respect to such moneys shall thereupon cease; provided, however, that before the repayment of such moneys to the District as aforesaid, the Trustee may (at the cost of the District) first mail to the Owners of any Bonds remaining unpaid at the addresses shown on the registration books maintained by the Trustee a notice, in such form as may be deemed appropriate by the Trustee, with respect to the Bonds so payable and not presented and with respect to the provisions relating to the repayment to the District of the moneys held for the payment thereof. Notwithstanding the foregoing, with respect to the Bonds, any amounts held by the Trustee after discharge shall be paid without presentation or surrender, except that the Owners will surrender its Bonds following receipt of all amounts due and owing under this Indenture and following the request of the District or the Trustee. -41- ARTICLE XIII MISCELLANEOUS Section 13.01. Liability of District Limited to Parcel Tax Revenues. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Indenture or in the Bonds, the District shall not be required to advance any moneys derived from any source other than the Parcel Tax Revenues for any of the purposes in this Indenture mentioned, whether for the payment of the principal or sinking fund installments of, or interest on the Bonds or for any other purpose of this Indenture. Section 13.02. Successor Is Deemed Included in All References to Predecessor. Whenever in this Indenture either the District or the Trustee is named or referred to, such reference shall be deemed to include the successors or assigns thereof, and all the covenants and agreements in this Indenture contained by or on behalf of the District or the Trustee shall bind and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns thereof whether so expressed or not. Section 13.03. Limitation of Rights to Parties and Owners. Nothing in this Indenture or in the Bonds expressed or implied is intended or shall be construed to give to any person other than the District, the Trustee and the Owners of the Bonds, any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or in respect of this Indenture or any covenant, condition or provision therein or herein contained; and all such covenants, conditions and provisions are and shall be held to be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the District, the Trustee and the Owners of the Bonds. Section 13.04. Waiver of Notice. Whenever in this Indenture the giving of notice by mail or otherwise is required, the giving of such notice may be waived in writing by the person entitled to receive such notice and in any such case the giving or receipt of such notice shall not be a condition precedent to the validity of any action taken in reliance upon such waiver. Section 13.05. Destruction of Bonds. Whenever in this Indenture provision is made for the cancellation by the Trustee and the delivery to the District of any Bonds, the Trustee may, in lieu of such cancellation and delivery, destroy such Bonds, and deliver a certificate of such destruction to the District. Section 13.06. Severability of Invalid Provisions. If any one or more of the provisions contained in this Indenture or in the Bond shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, then such provision or provisions shall be deemed severable from the remaining provisions contained in this Indenture and such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions of this Indenture, and this Indenture shall be construed as if such invalid or illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained in this Indenture. The District hereby declares that it would have entered into this Indenture and each and every other Section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase hereof and authorized the issuance of the Bonds pursuant thereto irrespective of the fact that any one or more Sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Indenture may be held illegal, invalid or unenforceable. Section 13.07. Notices. All written notices to be given under this Indenture shall be given by facsimile or by mail first class, postage prepaid, to the party entitled thereto at its address set forth below, or at such address as the party may provide to the other parties in writing from time to time. Any such notice shall be deemed to have been received 48 hours after deposit in the United States mail, with postage fully prepaid. -42- If to the District: West Contra Costa Healthcare District 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 Attention: Executive Director Phone: (925) 957-5405 If to the Trustee: U.S. Bank National Association One California Street, Suite 1000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Attention: Global Corporate Trust Phone: (415) 677-3622 If to the Original Purchasers: Pacific Western Bank 9701 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Attention: Managing Director Phone: (310) 887-8509 Western Alliance Business Trust c/o Western Alliance Bank One East Washington Street, Suite 100 Phoenix, AZ 85004 Attention: Municipal Finance Phone: (602) 389-3500 Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 13.07, the Trustee shall not be deemed to have received, and shall not be liable for failing to act upon the contents of, any notice unless and until the Trustee actually receives such notice. The Trustee agrees to accept and act upon the facsimile transmission of written instructions and/or pursuant to this Indenture; provided, however, that: (a) the District, subsequent to such facsimile transmission of written instructions, shall provide the originally executed instructions and/or directions to the Trustee in a timely manner, (b) such originally executed instructions and/or directions shall be signed by a person as may be designated and authorized to sign for the District, and (c) the District shall provide to the Trustee an incumbency certificate listing such designated persons which such incumbency certificate shall be amended whenever a person is to be added to or deleted from the listing. Section 13.08. Evidence of Rights of Owners. Any request, consent or other instrument required or permitted by this Indenture to be signed and executed by the Owners may be in any number of concurrent instruments of substantially similar tenor and shall be signed or executed by the Owners in person or by an agent or agents duly appointed in writing. Proof of the execution of any such request, consent or other instrument or of a writing appointing any such agent, or of the holding by any person of Bonds transferable by delivery, shall be sufficient for any purpose of this Indenture and shall be conclusive in favor of the Trustee and of the District if made in the manner provided in this Section 13.08. The fact and date of the execution by any person of any such request, consent or other instrument or writing may be proved by the certificate of any notary public or other officer of any jurisdiction, authorized by the laws thereof to take acknowledgments of deeds, certifying that the person signing such request, consent or other instrument acknowledged to him the execution thereof, or by an affidavit of a witness of such execution duly sworn to before such notary public or other officer. -43- The ownership of Bonds shall be proved by the bond registration books held by the Trustee. Any request, consent, or other instrument or writing of the Owner of any Bond shall bind every future Owner of the same Bond and the Owner of every Bond issued in exchange therefor or in lieu thereof, in respect of anything done or suffered to be done by the Trustee or the District in accordance therewith or in reliance thereon. Section 13.09. Disqualified Bonds. In determining whether the Owners of the requisite aggregate principal amount of Bonds have concurred in any demand, request, direction, consent or waiver under this Indenture, Bonds which are owned or held by or for the account of the District, or by any other obligor on the Bonds, or by any person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by, or under direct or indirect common control with the District or any other obligor on the Bonds, shall be disregarded and deemed not to be Outstanding for the purpose of any such determination. Bonds so owned which have been pledged in good faith may be regarded as Outstanding for the purposes of this Section 13.09 if the pledgee shall establish to the satisfaction of the Trustee the pledgee’s right to vote such Bonds and that the pledgee is not a person directly or indirectly controlling or controlled by, or under direct or indirect common control with, the District or any other obligor on the Bonds. In case of a dispute as to such right, any decision by the Trustee taken upon the advice of counsel shall be full protection to the Trustee. Upon request of the Trustee, the District shall specify to the Trustee those Bonds disqualified pursuant to this Section 13.09 and the Trustee may conclusively rely on such certificate. Section 13.10. Money Held for Particular Bonds. The money held by the Trustee for the payment of the principal or sinking fund installments of, or interest due on any date with respect to particular Bonds (or portions of Bonds in the case of registered Bonds redeemed in part only) shall, on and after such date and pending such payment, be set aside on its books and held in trust by it for the Owners of the Bonds entitled thereto, subject, however, to the provisions of Section 12.04 of this Indenture but without any liability for the interest thereon. Section 13.11. Funds and Accounts. Any fund required by this Indenture to be established and maintained by the Trustee may be established and maintained in the accounting records of the Trustee, either as a fund or an account, and may, for the purposes of such records, any audits thereof and any reports or statements with respect thereto, be treated either as a fund or as an account; but all such records with respect to all such funds shall at all times be maintained in accordance with customary standards of the corporate trust industry, to the extent practicable, and with due regard for the protection of the security of the Bonds and the rights of every Owner thereof. Section 13.12. Article and Section Headings and References. The headings or titles of the several Articles and Sections of this Indenture, and any table of contents appended to copies of this Indenture, shall be solely for convenience of reference and shall not affect the meaning, construction or effect of this Indenture. All references in this Indenture to “Articles,” “Sections” and other subdivisions are to the corresponding Articles, Sections or subdivisions of this Indenture; the words “herein,” “hereof,” “hereby,” “hereunder” and other words of similar import refer to this Indenture as a whole and not to any particular Article, Section or subdivision of this Indenture; and words of the masculine gender shall mean and include words of the feminine and neuter genders. Section 13.13. Waiver of Personal Liability. No Board member, officer, agent or employee of the District shall be individually or personally liable for the payment of principal -44- or sinking fund installments of, or interest on the Bonds or be subject to any personal liability or accountability by reason of the issuance thereof; but nothing herein contained shall relieve any such Board member, officer, agent or employee from the performance of any official duty provided by law or by this Indenture. Section 13.14. Execution in Several Counterparts. This Indenture may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original; and all such counterparts or as many of them as the District and the Trustee shall preserve undestroyed, shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. Section 13.15. Judicial Reference. (a) The District hereby agrees as follows: (i) each proceeding or hearing based upon or arising out of, directly or indirectly, this Indenture or any document related thereto, any dealings of the District related to the subject matter of this Indenture or any related transactions (hereinafter, a “Claim”) shall be determined by a consensual general judicial reference (the “Reference”) pursuant to the provisions of section 638 et seq. of the California Code of Civil Procedure, as such statutes may be amended or modified from time to time; (ii) upon a written request, or upon an appropriate motion by the District, any pending action relating to any Claim and every Claim shall be heard by a single Referee (as defined below) who shall then try all issues (including any and all questions of law and questions of fact relating thereto), and issue findings of fact and conclusions of law and report a statement of decision. The Referee’s statement of decision will constitute the conclusive determination of the Claim. The District agrees that the Referee shall have the power to issue all legal and equitable relief appropriate under the circumstances before the Referee; (iii) the District shall promptly and diligently cooperate with the Referee and shall perform such acts as may be necessary to obtain prompt and expeditious resolution of all Claims in accordance with the terms of this Section 13.15; (iv) the District may file the Referee’s findings, conclusions and statement with the clerk or judge of any appropriate court, file a motion to confirm the Referee’s report and have judgment entered thereon. If the report is deemed incomplete by such court, the Referee may be required to complete the report and resubmit it; (v) the District will have such rights to assert such objections as are set forth in section 638 et seq. of the California Code of Civil Procedure; and (vi) all proceedings shall be closed to the public and confidential, and all records relating to the Reference shall be permanently sealed when the order thereon becomes final. (b) The parties to the Reference proceeding shall select a single neutral referee (the “Referee”), who shall be a retired judge or justice of the courts of the State, or a federal court judge, in each case, with at least 10 years of judicial experience in civil matters. The Referee shall be appointed in accordance with section 638 of the California Code of Civil Procedure (or pursuant to comparable provisions of federal law if the dispute falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts). If within 10 days after the request or motion for the Reference, the parties to the Reference proceeding cannot agree upon a Referee, then any party to such -45- proceeding may request or move that the Referee be appointed by the Presiding Judge of the Contra Costa County Superior Court, or of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The Referee shall determine all issues relating to the applicability, interpretation, legality and enforceability of this Section 13.15. (c) No provision of this Section 13.15 shall limit the right of the District to (i) exercise such self-help remedies as might otherwise be available under applicable law; or (ii) obtain or oppose provisional or ancillary remedies, including without limitation injunctive relief, writs of possession, the appointment of a receiver, and/or additional or supplementary remedies from a court of competent jurisdiction before, after, or during the pendency of any Reference. The exercise of, or opposition to, any such remedy does not waive the right of the District to the Reference pursuant to this Section 13.15. (d) Promptly following the selection of the Referee, the parties to such Reference proceeding shall each advance equal portions of the estimated fees and costs of the Referee. In the statement of decision issued by the Referee, the Referee shall award costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, to the prevailing party, if any, and may order the Referee’s fees to be paid or shared by the parties to such Reference proceeding in such manner as the Referee deems just. Section 13.16. Sovereign Immunity. To the extent the District has or hereafter may acquire under any applicable law any rights to immunity from legal proceedings on the grounds of sovereignty, the District hereby waives, to the extent permitted by law, such rights to immunity for itself in respect of its obligations arising under or related to this Indenture. Section 13.17. Governing Law. This Indenture shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the Constitution and laws of the State. [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank] -46- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT has caused this Indenture to be signed in its name by its Executive Director and U.S. Bank National Association, in token of its acceptance of the trusts created under this Indenture, has caused this Indenture to be signed in its name by one of its authorized officers, all as of the day and year first above written. WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT By Executive Director Approved as to form by District Counsel: By Mark Schieble, Foley & Lardner LLP U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee By Vice President Quint & Thimmig LLP 05/10/19 05/16/19 Exhibit A 23018.05 Page 1 EXHIBIT A FORM OF BOND THIS BOND HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933. THIS BOND MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2.05 OF THE INDENTURE DESCRIBED HEREIN. United States of America State of California Contra Costa County WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bond, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) INTEREST RATE: MATURITY DATE: DATED DATE: 5.000%* July 1, 2042 June 27, 2019 REGISTERED OWNER: ____________________________ PRINCIPAL SUM: ___________________________ DOLLARS WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, a local health care District organized and existing under and pursuant to The Local Health Care District Law of the State of California (herein called the “District”), for value received, hereby promises to pay (but only out of the Parcel Tax Revenues (as defined in the hereinafter defined Indenture) and any other available moneys of the District therefor as hereinafter mentioned) to the Registered Owner stated above or registered assigns, on the Maturity Date stated above (subject to any right of prior redemption hereinafter mentioned), the Principal Sum stated above in lawful money of the United States of America, and to pay interest thereon, calculated on the basis of a 30-day month and 360 days in a year, in like lawful money from the date hereof until payment of such principal sum shall be discharged as provided in the Indenture hereinafter mentioned, at the Interest Rate per annum stated above, payable semiannually on each January 1 and July 1 (each, an “Interest Payment Date”), commencing January 1, 2020. The principal (or redemption price) hereof is payable (without presentation) at the Principal Corporate Trust Office (as defined in the Indenture) of U.S. Bank National Association (together with any successor trustee, herein called the “Trustee”) (or at the principal corporate trust office of any successor trustee). Interest *This is the Taxable Rate (as such term is defined in the Indenture) which is subject to conversion to the Tax-Exempt Rate (as such term is defined in the Indenture) pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture. If converted, the Tax- Exempt Rate will be 4.125%. If the Bonds are payable at the Tax-Exempt Rate, after the Date of Taxability following a Determination of Taxability, the interest rate may, at the option of the Owner, be increased to the Taxable Rate, as provided in a written notice of the Owner to the Trustee and the District. Exhibit A Page 2 hereon is payable (without presentation) by check mailed on each Interest Payment Date to the Owner as of the fifteenth calendar day of the month (except with respect to defaulted interest) next preceding each Interest Payment Date (herein called a “Record Date”) at the address shown on the registration books maintained by the Trustee; provided that such principal and interest shall be paid by wire transfer to any registered owner of at least $1,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of Bonds if the registered owner makes a written request of the Trustee prior to the Record Date specifying the account address. Further, from and during the continuance of an Event of Default under the Indenture, the Bonds shall, at the option of the Owner, bear interest at the Default Rate specified in the Indenture. This Bond is one of a duly authorized issue of bonds of the District designated as “West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt)” (herein called the “Bonds”), issued pursuant to the provisions of section 53570 et seq. of the California Government Code (herein called the “Law”), and an indenture, dated as of June 1, 2019, by and between the District and the Trustee (herein called the “Indenture”), in the aggregate principal amount of ________________ dollars ($___________). All capitalized terms not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Indenture. The interest rate payable with respect to the Bonds shall convert to the Tax-Exempt Rate, on any date on and after April 2, 2021 (the “Tax-Exempt Conversion Date”), upon the satisfaction of the following conditions precedent to such conversion: (i) The election by the District to convert the interest rate with respect to the Bonds to the Tax-Exempt Rate; (ii) Selection by the Original Purchasers of one of the following semi-annual principal amortization schedules which shall become applicable to all Bonds to maturity: Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount †Maturity or Exhibit A Page 3 Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount †Maturity (iii) Appropriate amendments or supplements to the Indenture, if required, subject to the requirements thereof; (iv) Delivery of an arbitrage certificate executed by the District with respect to certain tax matters relating to the Bonds after interest with respect thereto is converted to the Tax-Exempt Rate; (v) The filing of an IRS Form 8038-G, executed by the District; and (vi) Issuance of an opinion of Bond Counsel (as such term is defined in the Indenture) to the effect that the conditions precedent set forth above to the conversion of interest with respect to the Bonds to the Tax-Exempt Rate have been satisfied and that subject to the District’s compliance with certain covenants, interest with respect to the Bonds is excludable from gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes, is not included as an item of tax preference in computing the alternative minimum tax under the Code. Reference is hereby made to the Indenture (a copy of which is on file at said office of the Trustee) and all indentures supplemental thereto and to the Law for a description of the rights thereunder of the registered owner of the Bonds, the nature and extent of the security, the rights, duties and immunities of the Trustee, and the rights and obligations of the District thereunder. The Owner of this Bond, by acceptance hereof, assents and agrees to all the provisions of the Indenture. The Bonds and the interest thereon are payable from and are secured by a pledge and assignment of Parcel Tax Revenues (as defined in the Indenture) and of amounts held in the funds and accounts established pursuant to the Indenture, subject only to the provisions of the Indenture permitting the application thereof for the purposes and on the terms and conditions set forth in the Indenture. The Bonds are limited obligations of the District and are not a lien or charge upon the funds or property of the District, except to the extent of the aforesaid pledge and assignment. Neither the faith and credit nor the tax revenues received by the District are pledged to the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds. The Bonds are not a debt of the State of California or any political subdivision thereof, and neither said State nor any political Exhibit A Page 4 subdivision thereof (except the District to the extent provided in the Indenture) is liable for the payment thereof. The Bonds are subject to redemption, at the option of the District on any Interest Payment Date, as a whole or in part, from any available source of funds, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof, together with accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption, without premium Subject to a variation in the sinking fund redemption schedule selected by the Original Purchasers in connection with the conversion of interest on the Bonds to the Tax-Exempt Rate pursuant to the Indenture, the Bonds are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption on January 1 and July 1 on the dates and in the amounts specified in the following table. Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount †Maturity If this Bond is called for redemption and payment is duly provided therefor as specified in the Indenture, interest shall cease to accrue hereon from and after the date fixed for redemption. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of any optional redemption of the Bonds, the notice of redemption may state that the redemption is conditioned upon receipt by the Trustee of sufficient moneys to redeem the Bonds on the anticipated redemption date, and that the optional redemption shall not occur if, by no later than the scheduled redemption date, sufficient moneys to redeem the Bonds have not been deposited with the Trustee. In the event that the Trustee does not receive sufficient funds by the scheduled optional redemption date to so redeem the Bonds to be optionally redeemed, such event shall not constitute an Event of Default; the Trustee shall send written notice to the Owner to the effect that the redemption did not occur as anticipated, and the Bonds for which notice of optional redemption was given shall remain Outstanding for all purposes of this Indenture. If an Event of Default (as that term is defined in the Indenture) shall occur, the principal of all Bonds may be declared due and payable upon the conditions, in the manner and with the effect provided in the Indenture. The Indenture provides that in certain events such declaration and its consequences may be rescinded by the registered owner of the Bonds then outstanding or by the Trustee. Exhibit A Page 5 The Bonds are issuable as one fully registered bond. Subject to the limitations and upon payment of the charges, if any, provided in the Indenture, Bonds may be exchanged, at said office of the Trustee, for a like aggregate principal amount of Bonds of the same maturity of other authorized denominations. This Bond is transferable by the Owner hereof, in person or by his or her attorney duly authorized in writing, at the principal corporate trust office of the Trustee, but only in the manner, subject to the limitations and upon payment of the charges, if any, provided in the Indenture, and upon surrender and cancellation of this Bond. Upon such transfer a new registered Bond or Bonds, of authorized denomination or denominations, of the same maturity for the same aggregate principal amount, will be issued to the transferee in exchange herefor. The District and the Trustee may treat the Owner hereof as the absolute owner hereof for all purposes, and the District and the Trustee shall not be affected by any notice to the contrary The Indenture and the rights and obligations of the District, the registered owner of the Bonds and the Trustee may be modified or amended from time to time and at any time in the manner, to the extent and upon the terms provided in the Indenture; provided that no such modification or amendment shall (i) extend the fixed maturity of any Bond, or reduce the amount of principal hereof, or extend the time of payment or reduce the amount of any Mandatory Sinking Account Payment provided for in the Indenture for the payment of this maturity of Bonds, or reduce the rate of interest hereon, or extend the time of payment of interest hereon, or reduce any premium payable upon the redemption hereof, without the consent of the registered owner of each Bond so affected, or (ii) reduce the percentage of Bonds the consent of the registered owner of which is required to effect any such modification or amendment, or permit the creation of any lien on the Parcel Tax Revenues and other assets pledged as security for the Bonds prior to or on a parity with the lien created by the Indenture, or deprive the registered owner of the Bonds of the lien created by the Indenture on such Parcel Tax Revenues and other assets (except as expressly provided in the Indenture), without the consent of the registered owner of the Bonds, all as more fully set forth in the Indenture. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED AND RECITED that any and all conditions, things and acts required to exist, to have happened and to have been performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond do exist, have happened and have been performed in due time, form and manner as required by the Law, and by the Constitution and laws of the State of California, and that the amount of this Bond, together with all other indebtedness of the District, does not exceed any limit prescribed by the Constitution and laws of the State of California, and is not in excess of the amount of Bonds permitted to be issued under the Indenture. This Bond shall not be entitled to any benefit under the Indenture or become valid or obligatory for any purpose until the Trustee’s Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been manually signed by the Trustee. Exhibit A Page 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT has caused this Bond to be executed in its name and on its behalf by the facsimile signature of its Executive Director and attested by the facsimile signature of the Secretary of its Board of Directors, all as of the Dated Date stated above. WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT By Executive Director Attest: Secretary TRUSTEE’S CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION This is one of the Bonds described in the within-mentioned Indenture. Authentication Date: _______________ U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Trustee By Authorized Signatory Exhibit A Page 7 ASSIGNMENT For value received, the undersigned do(es) hereby sell, assign and transfer unto (Name, Address and Tax Identification or Social Security Number of Assignee) the within Bond and do(es) hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint , attorney, to transfer the same on the registration books of the Trustee, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: _______________ Signature Guaranteed: NOTICE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (banks, stock brokers, savings and loan associations and credit unions with membership in an approved signature guarantee medallion program) pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 17 Ad-15. NOTICE: The signature(s) on this Assignment must correspond with the name(s) as written on the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever. EXHIBIT B FORM OF PURCHASER’S LETTER West Contra Costa Healthcare District Martinez, California Re: West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) Ladies and Gentlemen: The undersigned (the “Purchaser”), being the purchaser of $__________ of the above- referenced bonds (the “Bonds”) does hereby certify, represent and warrant for the benefit of the West Contra Costa Healthcare District (the “District”) and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”) that: (a) The Purchaser (MARK OR INDICATE APPROPRIATELY): [___] is a qualified institutional buyer” (a “Qualified Institutional Buyer”) within the meaning of Rule 144A promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), [___] is an “accredited investor” as defined in Section 501(a)(1), (2), (3) or (7) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act (an “Accredited Investor”), or [___] a trust, partnership, custodial arrangement or similar entity, interests in which are offered and sold in a private placement or limited offering only to Qualified Institutional Buyers or Accredited Investors. (b) The Purchaser understands that the Bonds have not been registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or under any state securities laws. The Purchaser agrees that it will comply with any applicable state and federal securities laws then in effect with respect to any disposition of the Bonds by it, and further acknowledges that any current exemption from registration of the Bonds does not affect or diminish such requirements. (c) The Purchaser is not now and has never been controlled by, or under common control with, the District. The District has never been and is not now controlled by the Purchaser. The Purchaser has entered into no arrangements with the District or with any affiliate in connection with the Bonds, other than as disclosed to the District. (d) The Purchaser has authority to purchase the Bonds and to execute this letter and any other instruments and documents required to be executed by the Purchaser in connection with the purchase of the Bonds. The individual who is signing this letter on behalf of the Purchaser is a duly appointed, qualified, and acting officer of the Purchaser and is authorized to cause the Purchaser to make the certificates, representations and warranties contained in this Indenture by execution of this letter on behalf of the Purchaser. -2- (e) The Purchaser has been informed that the Bonds (i) have not been and will not be registered or otherwise qualified for sale under the “Blue Sky” laws and regulations of any jurisdiction, and (ii) will not be listed on any stock or other securities exchange. (f) The Bonds are being acquired by the Purchaser for its own loan account only and the Purchaser acknowledges that it has the right to sell and transfer the Bonds, subject to compliance with the transfer restrictions set forth in Section 2.05 of the Indenture of Trust, dated as of June 1, 2019, by and between the District and the Trustee (the “Indenture”), including in certain circumstances the requirement for the delivery to the District and the Trustee of a letter in the same form as this Purchaser’s Letter, including this paragraph. Failure to comply with the provisions of Section 2.05 of the Indenture shall cause the purported transfer to be null and void. (h) Neither the Trustee nor the District’s bond counsel, or any of their employees, counsel or agents will have any responsibility to the Purchaser for the accuracy or completeness of information obtained by the Purchaser from any source regarding the District or its financial condition, the provision for payment of the Bonds, or the sufficiency of any security therefor. The Purchaser acknowledges that, as between the Purchaser and all of such parties, the Purchaser has assumed responsibility for obtaining such information and making such review as the Purchaser deemed necessary or desirable in connection with its decision to purchase the Bonds. (i) The Purchaser acknowledges that the Bonds are exempt from the requirements of Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that the District has not undertaken to provide any continuing disclosure with respect to the Bonds, except as otherwise provided in the Indenture. (j) Inasmuch as the Bonds represents a negotiated transaction, the District understands, and hereby confirms, that the Purchaser is not acting as a fiduciary of the District, but rather is acting solely in its capacity as a Purchaser, for its own account. The District acknowledges and agrees that: (i) the transaction contemplated herein is an arm’s length commercial transaction between the District and the Purchaser and its affiliates; (ii) in connection with such transaction, the Purchaser and its affiliates are acting solely as a principal and not as an advisor including, without limitation, a “Municipal Advisor” as such term is defined in Section 15B of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the related final rules (the “Municipal Advisor Rules”); (iii) the Purchaser and its affiliates are relying on the bank exemption in the Municipal Advisor Rules; (iv) the Purchaser and its affiliates have not provided any advice or assumed any advisory or fiduciary responsibility in favor of the District with respect to the transaction contemplated hereby and the discussions, undertakings and procedures leading thereto; (v) the Purchaser and its affiliates have financial and other interests that differ from those of the District; and (vi) the District has consulted with its own financial, legal, accounting, tax and other advisors, as applicable, to the extent it deemed appropriate. -3- The Purchaser acknowledges that the sale of the Bonds to the Purchaser is made in reliance upon the certifications, representations and warranties in this Indenture by the addressees hereto. Capitalized terms used in this Indenture and not otherwise defined have the meanings given such terms in the Indenture. [PURCHASER] By Name Title 23018.05 $___________ WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT June 12, 2019 West Contra Costa Healthcare District 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 Ladies and Gentlemen: Pacific Western Bank (the “Purchaser”), offers to enter into this Bond Purchase Agreement (the “Bond Purchase Agreement”) with the West Contra Costa Healthcare District (the “District”), which will be binding upon the District and the Purchaser upon the acceptance hereof by the District. This offer is made subject to its acceptance by the District by execution of this Bond Purchase Agreement and its delivery to the Purchaser on or before 5:00 P.M., California time, on the date hereof. Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Indenture, described below. 1. Purchase and Sale. Upon the terms and conditions and in reliance upon the representations, warranties and covenants herein, the District hereby agrees to sell to the Purchaser and the Purchaser hereby agrees to purchase from the District, $______ principal amount of the $___________ West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) (the “Bonds”), at the purchase price of $___________ (the “Purchase Price”), being the principal amount of the Bonds purchased by the Purchaser. The Purchase Price will be delivered on the Closing Date (as defined in Section 6 below), to U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), on behalf of the District. The District acknowledges and agrees that (i) the purchase and sale of the Bonds pursuant to this Bond Purchase Agreement is an arm’s-length commercial transaction between the District and the Purchaser; (ii) in connection with such transaction, including the process leading thereto, the Purchaser is acting solely as a principal and not as an agent or a fiduciary of the District; (iii) the Purchaser has neither assumed an advisory or fiduciary responsibility in favor of the District with respect to the offering of the Bonds or the process leading thereto (whether or not the Purchaser, or any affiliate of the Purchaser, has advised or is currently advising the District on other matters) nor has it assumed any other obligation to the District except the obligations expressly set forth in this Bond Purchase Agreement, (iv) the Purchaser has financial and other interests that differ from those of the District; and (v) the District has -2- consulted with its own legal and financial advisors to the extent it deemed appropriate in connection with the offering of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be dated the Closing Date, shall bear interest at the rate, shall mature on the date and in the principal amount and shall be subject to redemption, all as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. If the purchase of the Bonds does not close on or before June 25, 2019, the interest rate specified in Exhibit A shall no longer be effective and the Purchaser and the District shall agree on a new rate. The Bonds are being issued pursuant to the provisions of section 53570 et seq. of the California Government Code, a resolution of the District, adopted on June 11, 2019 (the “District Resolution”), and that certain Indenture of Trust, dated as of June 1, 2019 (the “Indenture”), by and between the District and the Trustee. The District’s obligation to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds will be secured by a first and prior lien on the revenues derived by the District from an annual special parcel tax on each taxable parcel of real property within the District (exclusive of parcels for which exemptions have been granted, approved by approximately 84% of the voters of the District at a special election held on June 8, 2004 (the “Authorization”)), on a parity with the District’s outstanding West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2018. The Bonds are being issued for the purpose of (a) providing funds to the District to refund, on an advance basis, (i) the District’s West Contra Costa Healthcare District Certificates of Participation (2011 Financing Program) (the “2011 COPs”), of which $39,535,000 is currently outstanding, and (b) paying the costs of issuing the Bonds. Pursuant to an escrow agreement (the “Escrow Agreement”), by and between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow bank (the “Escrow Bank”), provision will be made for the payment of principal and interest with respect to the 2011 COPs to and including July 1, 2021, and for the redemption of the 2011 COPs in full on such date, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, together with accrued interest to such date. -3- 2. Private Placement. (a) The Purchaser has sufficient knowledge and experience in business and financial matters to enable the Purchaser to evaluate the Bonds, the credit of the District, the collateral and the Bond terms and that the Purchaser will make its own independent credit analysis and decision to purchase the Bonds based on independent examination and evaluation of the transaction and the information deemed appropriate. (b) The Purchaser acknowledges that no credit rating has been sought or obtained with respect to the Bonds. (c) The Purchaser acknowledges that no official statement has been prepared for the Bonds, and that the District will not be entering into a continuing disclosure agreement with respect to the Bonds; provided, however, that the District has agreed to provide certain ongoing information to the Purchaser. (d) The Purchaser states that (a) it is a commercial bank with total assets of at least $50 million; (b) it is capable of evaluating investment independently; (c) it is exercising independent judgment in evaluating (i) the recommendation of Piper Jaffray & Co. (the “Placement Agent”) or its associated persons; and (ii) the quality of execution of the Purchaser’s transactions by the Placement Agent; and (c) the Purchaser has timely access to material information that is available publicly through established industry sources as defined in Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) Rule G-47; (e) The Purchaser is purchasing the Bonds solely for its own account, and not with a view to, or in connection with, any distribution, resale, pledging, fractionalization, subdivision or other disposition thereof (subject to the understanding that disposition of Purchaser’s property will remain at all times within its control). The Purchaser has directed that no CUSIP number shall be obtained for the Bonds or that the Bonds be DTC eligible as of their initial purchase. (f) The Purchaser understands that the Bonds (i) have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and (ii) have not been registered or qualified under any state securities or “Blue Sky” laws, and that the Indenture has not been qualified under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended. (g) The Purchaser has been furnished with and has examined the Bonds, the Indenture and other documents, certificates and the legal opinions delivered in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. (h) The Purchaser understands that the District and the Placement Agent and their respective counsel and Bond Counsel will rely upon the accuracy and truthfulness of the representations and warranties contained herein and hereby consents to such reliance. (i) The interest rates on the Bonds are reasonable based upon current market conditions and there is no “blending” of the two rates. 3. Representations, Warranties and Agreements of the District. The District represents and warrants to the Purchaser that, as of the Closing Date: (a) The District is a local health care district, organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the “State”), and is authorized, among other things, (i) to issue the Bonds, and (ii) to secure the Bonds in the manner contemplated by the Indenture. -4- (b) The District has the full right, power and authority (i) to adopt the District Resolution, (ii) to enter into the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement and this Bond Purchase Agreement, (iii) to issue, sell and deliver the Bonds to the Purchaser as provided herein, and (iv) to carry out and consummate all other transactions on its part contemplated by each of the aforesaid documents, and the District has complied with all provisions of applicable law and the Authorization in all matters relating to such transactions. (c) The District has duly authorized (i) the execution and delivery of the Bonds and the execution, delivery and due performance by the District of this Bond Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement and the Indenture, and (ii) the taking of any and all such action as may be required on the part of the District to carry out, give effect to and consummate the transactions on its part contemplated by such instruments. All consents or approvals necessary to be obtained by the District in connection with the foregoing have been received, including, but not limited to, all authorizations, if any, required by its bankruptcy settlement order and the consents or approvals so received are still in full force and effect. (d) The Bonds, when issued, authenticated and delivered in accordance with the District Resolution and the Indenture, and sold to the Purchaser as provided herein, will constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of the District, enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, except as enforcement thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws or equitable principles relating to or limiting creditors' rights generally, the application of equitable principles, the exercise of judicial discretion and the limitations on legal remedies against public entities in the State, and are entitled to the benefits of the laws of the State, the Indenture and the District Resolution. (e) Neither the execution and delivery by the District of the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement, this Bond Purchase Agreement and of the Bonds nor the consummation of the transactions on the part of the District contemplated herein or therein or the compliance with the provisions hereof or thereof will conflict with, or constitute on the part of the District a violation of, or a breach of or default under, (i) any statute, indenture, mortgage, note or other agreement or instrument to which the District is a party or by which it is bound, (ii) any provision of the State Constitution or the Authorization, or (iii) any existing law, rule, regulation, ordinance, judgment, order or decree to which the District (or the members of the District or any of its officers in their respective capacities as such) is subject. (f) The District has never been in default at any time, as to principal of or interest on any obligation which it has issued except as otherwise specifically disclosed to the Purchaser; and the District has not entered into any contract or arrangement of any kind which might give rise to any lien or encumbrance on the Parcel Tax Revenues pledged to the payment of the Bonds except as otherwise specifically disclosed to the Purchaser. (g) Except as otherwise specifically disclosed in writing to the Purchaser, there is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation, at law or in equity, before or by any court, public board or body, which has been served on the District or, to the best knowledge of the District, threatened, which in any way questions the powers of the District referred to in paragraph (b) above, or the validity of any proceeding taken by the District in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, or wherein an unfavorable decision, ruling or finding could materially adversely affect the transactions contemplated by this Bond Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement or the Indenture, or which, in any way, could adversely affect the validity or enforceability of the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement, the Bonds or this Bond Purchase Agreement or, to the knowledge of the District, which in any way questions the exclusion from gross income of the recipients thereof the interest on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes -5- or in any other way questions the status of the Bonds under federal or state tax laws or regulations or which in any way could materially adversely affect the availability of Parcel Tax Revenues. (h) The financial statements of, and other financial information regarding the District relating to the receipts, expenditures and cash balances of revenues by the District as of December 31, 2018, fairly represent the receipts, expenditures and cash balances of such amounts and, insofar as presented, other funds of the District as of the dates and for the periods therein set forth. The financial statements of the District have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied. There has not been any materially adverse change in the financial condition of the District or in its operations since December 31, 2018, and there has been no occurrence, circumstance or combination thereof which is reasonably expected to result in any such materially adverse change. (i) During the period of time that the Bonds are outstanding, the District hereby covenants and agrees to furnish or cause to be furnished to the Purchaser, at the District’s expense, within nine (9) months after the end of the District’s fiscal year, (i) the audited financial statements of the District for that year, (ii) the District’s assessed valuation for the current fiscal year and (iii) the District’s parcel tax levy for the current fiscal year. (j) Any certificate signed by any official of the District and delivered to the Purchaser in connection with the offer or sale of the Bonds shall be deemed a representation, covenant and warranty by the District to the Purchaser as to the truth of the statements therein contained. (k) The District has not been notified of any listing or proposed listing by the Internal Revenue Service to the effect that it is a bond issuer whose arbitrage certifications may not be relied upon. (l) The Bonds shall not be registered or otherwise qualified under any Blue Sky or other securities laws. (m) All authorizations, approvals, licenses, permits, consents, elections, and orders of or filings with any governmental authority, legislative body, board, agency or commission having jurisdiction in the matters which are required by the Closing Date for the due authorization of, which would constitute a condition precedent to or the absence of which would adversely affect the due performance by the District of, its obligations in connection with the Indenture have been duly obtained or made and are in full force and effect. (n) Between the date of this Bond Purchase Agreement and the Closing Date, the District will not offer or issue any bonds, notes or other obligations for borrowed money not previously disclosed to the Purchaser. (o) The District will apply the proceeds of the Bonds in accordance with the Indenture and any related documents. (p) To the extent the District has or hereafter may acquire under any applicable law any rights to immunity from legal proceedings on the grounds of sovereignty, the District hereby waives, to the extent permitted by law, such rights to immunity for itself in respect of its obligations arising under or related to the Indenture or this Bond Purchase Agreement. 4. Closing. On June 27, 2019, or at such other date and times as shall have been mutually agreed upon by the District and the Purchaser (the “Closing Date”), the District will deliver or cause to be delivered the Bonds to the Purchaser, and the District shall deliver or cause to be -6- delivered to the Purchaser the certificates, opinions and documents hereinafter mentioned, each of which shall be dated as of the Closing Date. The activities relating to the execution and delivery of the Bonds, opinions and other instruments as described in Section 8 of this Bond Purchase Agreement shall occur on the Closing Date. The delivery of the certificates, opinions and documents as described herein shall be made at the offices Quint & Thimmig LLP, in Larkspur, California (“Bond Counsel”), or at such other place as shall have been mutually agreed upon by the District and the Purchaser. Such delivery is herein called the “Closing.” The Bonds will be prepared and physically delivered to the Purchaser on the Closing Date in the form of a separate single fully registered bond. The Bonds will be authenticated by the Trustee in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Indenture. The Purchaser will pay the Purchase Price of the Bonds by delivering to the Trustee, for the account of the District a wire transfer in federal funds of the Purchase Price payable to the order of the Trustee. 5. Closing Conditions. The obligations of the Purchaser hereunder shall be subject to the performance by the District of its obligations hereunder at or prior to the Closing Date and are also subject to the following conditions: (a) the representations, warranties and covenants of the District contained herein shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the Closing Date; (b) as of the Closing Date, there shall have been no material adverse change in the financial condition of the District; (c) as of the Closing Date, all official action of the District relating to this Bond Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement and the Indenture shall be in full force and effect; (d) as of the Closing Date, the Purchaser shall receive the following certificates, opinions and documents, in each case satisfactory in form and substance to the Purchaser: (i) a copy of the Indenture, as duly executed and delivered by the District and the Trustee; (ii) a copy of the Escrow Agreement, as duly executed and delivered by the District and the Escrow Bank; (iii) an opinion of Bond Counsel, in form acceptable to the Purchaser, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the District, with reliance letters addressed to the Purchaser and to the Trustee; (iv) a certificate, dated the Closing Date, of the District executed by the Executive Director (or other duly appointed officer of the District authorized by the District by resolution of the District) to the effect that (A) there is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation at law or in equity before or by any court, public board or body which has been served on the District or, to the knowledge of the District, threatened against or affecting the District to restrain or enjoin the District’s participation in, or in any way contesting the existence of the District or the powers of the District with respect to, the transactions contemplated by this Bond Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement or the Indenture, and consummation of such transactions; and (B) the representations and warranties of the District contained in this Bond Purchase Agreement are true and correct in all material respects, and the District has complied with all agreements and -7- covenants and satisfied all conditions to be satisfied at or prior to the Closing Date as contemplated by the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement and this Bond Purchase Agreement; (v) an opinion of counsel to the District, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the District and the Purchaser to the effect that: (A) the District is a local healthcare district, organized and existing under the laws of the State; (B) the District has full legal power and lawful authority to enter into the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement and this Bond Purchase Agreement; (C) the District Resolution has been duly adopted at a meeting of the governing body of the District, which was called and held pursuant to the law and with all public notice required by law and at which a quorum was present and acting throughout and the District Resolution is in full force and effect and has not been modified, amended or rescinded; (D) the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement and this Bond Purchase Agreement have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the District and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by the other parties thereof, constitute the valid, legal and binding agreements of the District enforceable in accordance with their terms; and (E) Except as otherwise specifically disclosed to the Purchaser, there is no litigation, action, suit, proceeding or investigation (or any basis therefor) at law or in equity before or by any court, governmental agency or body, pending by way of a summons served against the District or, to our knowledge, threatened against the District, challenging the creation, organization or existence of the District, or the validity of the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement or this Bond Purchase Agreement or seeking to restrain or enjoin any of the transactions referred to therein or contemplated thereby or contesting the authority of the District to enter into or perform its obligations under the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement or this Bond Purchase Agreement, or under which a determination adverse to the District would have a material adverse effect upon the availability of Parcel Tax Revenues, or which, in any manner, questions the right of the District to enter into, and perform under, the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement or this Bond Purchase Agreement; (vi) an opinion of counsel to the Trustee, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the District and the Purchaser, to the effect that: (A) The Trustee is a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, having full power to enter into, accept and administer the trust created under the Indenture; (B) The Indenture has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Trustee and the Indenture constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Trustee enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as enforcement thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or other laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and by the application of equitable principles, if equitable remedies are sought; and -8- (C) No consent, approval, authorization or other action by any governmental or regulatory authority having jurisdiction over the Trustee that has not been obtained is or will be required for the execution and delivery of the Indenture or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Indenture; (vii) an opinion of counsel to the Escrow Bank, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the District and the Purchaser, to the effect that: (A) The Escrow Bank is a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, having full power to enter into, accept and administer the its obligations under the Escrow Agreement; (B) The Escrow Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Escrow Bank and the Escrow Agreement constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Escrow Bank enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, except as enforcement thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or other laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and by the application of equitable principles, if equitable remedies are sought; and (C) No consent, approval, authorization or other action by any governmental or regulatory authority having jurisdiction over the Escrow Bank that has not been obtained is or will be required for the execution and delivery of the Escrow Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Escrow Agreement; (viii) a certificate, dated the Closing Date, of the Trustee, signed by a duly authorized officer of the Trustee, to the effect that (A) the Trustee is duly organized and validly existing as a national banking association, with full corporate power to undertake the trust of the Indenture; (B) the Trustee has duly authorized, executed and delivered the Indenture and by all proper corporate action has authorized the acceptance of the trust of the Indenture; and (C) to the best of such officer’s knowledge, there is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation at law or in equity before or by any court, public board or body which has been served on the Trustee (either in state or federal courts), or to the knowledge of the Trustee which would restrain or enjoin the execution or delivery of the Indenture, or which would affect the validity or enforceability of the Indenture, or the Trustee’s participation in, or in any way contesting the powers or the authority of the Trustee with respect to, the transactions contemplated by the Indenture, or any other agreement, document or certificate related to such transactions; (ix) a certificate, dated the Closing Date, of the Escrow Bank, signed by a duly authorized officer of the Escrow Bank, to the effect that (A) the Escrow Bank is duly organized and validly existing as a national banking association, with full corporate power to undertake its obligations under the Escrow Agreement; (B) the Escrow Bank has duly authorized, executed and delivered the Escrow Agreement and by all proper corporate action has authorized the acceptance of its obligations under the Escrow Agreement; and (C) to the best of such officer’s knowledge, there is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation at law or in equity before or by any court, public board or body which has been served on the Escrow Bank (either in state or federal courts), or to -9- the knowledge of the Escrow Bank which would restrain or enjoin the execution or delivery of the Escrow Agreement, or which would affect the validity or enforceability of the Escrow Agreement, or the Escrow Bank’s participation in, or in any way contesting the powers or the authority of the Escrow Bank with respect to, the transactions contemplated by the Escrow Agreement, or any other agreement, document or certificate related to such transactions; (x) a supplemental opinion of Bond Counsel, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the District and the Purchaser, to the effect that: (A) this Bond Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the District and, assuming the valid execution and delivery by the other parties thereto, are valid and binding upon the District, subject to the laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization of creditors’ rights generally and to the application of equitable principles; and (B) the Bonds are exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act and the Indenture are exempt from qualification pursuant to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended; (xi) an Arbitrage Certificate in the form satisfactory to Bond Counsel; (xii) a certified copy of the District Resolution; (xiii) the specimen Bond; (xiv) evidence that the federal tax information form 8038-G with respect to the Bonds has been prepared by Bond Counsel for filing; (xv) evidence of required filings with the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission; (xvi) the defeasance opinion of Bond Counsel with respect to the 2011 COPs, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the District, the Trustee, the Escrow Bank and the Purchaser, in form and substance satisfactory to the Purchaser; (xvii) the opinion of Bond Counsel relating to certain bankruptcy matters, addressed to the District and the Purchaser, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B; and (xviii) such additional legal opinions, certificates, instruments and other documents as the Purchaser may reasonably deem necessary to evidence the truth and accuracy as of the time of the Closing Date of the representations and warranties of the District contained in this Bond Purchase Agreement and the due performance or satisfaction by the District at or prior to such time of all agreements then to be performed and all conditions then to be satisfied by the District pursuant to this Bond Purchase Agreement. 6. Termination. The Purchaser shall have the right to cancel its obligations to purchase the Bonds if between the date hereof and the Closing Date: (a) legislation shall have been enacted, or considered for enactment with an effective date prior to the Closing Date, or a decision by a court of the United States shall have been -10- rendered, the effect of which is that of the Bonds, including any underlying obligations, or the Indenture, as the case may be, is not exempt from the registration, qualification or other requirements of the Securities Act and as then in effect, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and as then in effect, or the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended and as then in effect; or (b) a stop order, ruling, regulation or offering circular by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction of the subject matter shall have been issued or made or any other event occurs, the effect of which is that the issuance, offering or sale of the Bonds, including any underlying obligations, or the execution of the Indenture, as contemplated hereby, is or would be in violation of any provisions of the federal securities laws, including the Securities Act and as then in effect, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and as then in effect, or the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended and as then in effect; or (c) there shall have occurred any outbreak of hostilities or any national or international calamity or crisis, including a financial crisis, the effect of which on the financial markets of the United States is such as, in the reasonable judgment of the Purchaser, would materially adversely affect the Bonds; or (d) there shall be in force a general suspension of trading on the New York Stock Exchange, the effect of which on the financial markets of the United States is such as, in the reasonable judgment of the Purchaser, would materially adversely affect the Bonds; or (e) a general banking moratorium shall have been declared by federal, New York or California authorities; or (f) any proceeding shall be pending or threatened by the Securities and Exchange Commission against the District; or (g) additional material restrictions not in force as of the date hereof shall have been imposed upon trading in securities generally by any governmental authority or by any national securities exchange; or (h) the New York Stock Exchange or other national securities exchange, or any governmental or regulatory authority, shall impose, as to the Bonds or obligations of the general character of the Bonds, any material restrictions not now in force, or increase materially those now in force, with respect to the extension of credit by, or the charge to the net capital requirements of the Purchaser; or (i) any change, which in the reasonable opinion of the Purchaser, materially adversely affects the Bonds or, the financial condition of the District. 7. Contingency of Obligations. The obligations of the District hereunder are subject to the performance by the Purchaser of its obligations hereunder. 8. Duration of Representations, Warranties, Agreements and Covenants. All representations, warranties, agreements and covenants of the District shall remain operative and in full force and effect, regardless of any investigations made by or on behalf of the Purchaser or the District and shall survive the Closing Date. 9. Expenses. The District will pay or cause to be paid all reasonable expenses incident to the performance of its obligations under this Bond Purchase Agreement, including, but not -11- limited to, mailing or delivery of the Bonds, costs of printing the Bonds, the fees and disbursements of the Trustee, the Placement Agent, its financial advisor, Bond Counsel, the Purchaser, counsel to the Purchaser and counsel to the District, the fees and expenses of the District’s accountants and fiscal consultants and the reporting fee to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission. In the event this Bond Purchase Agreement shall terminate because of the default of the Purchaser, the District will, nevertheless, pay, or cause to be paid, all of the expenses specified above. The Purchaser shall have no responsibility for any costs or expenses associated with the Bonds including, but not limited to, the expenses identified above. 10. Notices. Any notice or other communication to be given to the District under this Bond Purchase Agreement may be given by delivering the same in writing to its Executive Director, West Contra Costa Healthcare District, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553, and any notice or other communication to be given to the Purchaser under this Bond Purchase Agreement may be given by delivering the same in writing to Pacific Western Bank, 9701 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, Attention: Managing Director. 11. Parties in Interest. This Bond Purchase Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the District and the Purchaser (including the successors or assigns of the Purchaser) and no other person, including any purchaser of the Bonds, shall acquire or have any right hereunder or by virtue hereof. 12. Governing Law. This Bond Purchase Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California applicable to contracts made and performed in California. 13. Headings. The headings of the paragraphs of this Bond Purchase Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to be a part hereof. 14. Severability. In case any one or more of the provisions contained herein shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof. 15. Effectiveness. This Bond Purchase Agreement shall become effective upon acceptance hereof by the District. 16. Judicial Reference. The provisions of Section 13.15 of the Indenture relating to judicial reference shall be incorporated herein by reference. -12- 15. Counterparts. This Bond Purchase Agreement may be executed in several counterparts which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Very truly yours, PACIFIC WESTERN BANK, as Purchaser By Name Title Accepted and agreed to as of the date first above written: WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT By Name Title Approved as to form by District Counsel: By Mark Schieble, Foley & Lardner LLP [West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt)] Exhibit A Page 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE $___________ WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) MATURITY SCHEDULE Maturity Date Principal Interest (July 1) Amount Rate 2042 $___________ 5.000%* REDEMPTION PROVISIONS Optional Redemption of Bonds. The Bonds are subject to redemption, at the option of the District on any Interest Payment Date, as a whole or in part, from any available source of funds, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof, together with accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption, without premium Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption of Bonds. Subject to a variation in the sinking fund schedule redemption selected by the Original Purchasers in connection with the conversion of interest on the Bonds to the Tax-Exempt Rate pursuant to the Indenture, the Bonds are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption on January 1 and July 1 in each year, on the dates and in the amounts specified in the following table. Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount January 1, 2020 January 1, 2028 July 1, 2035 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2028 January 1, 2036 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2029 July 1, 2036 July 1, 2021 July 1, 2029 January 1, 2037 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2030 July 1, 2037 July 1, 2022 July 1, 2030 January 1, 2038 January 1, 2023 January 1, 2031 July 1, 2038 July 1, 2023 July 1, 2031 January 1, 2039 January 1, 2024 January 1, 2032 July 1, 2039 July 1, 2024 July 1, 2032 January 1, 2040 January 1, 2025 January 1, 2033 July 1, 2040 July 1, 2025 July 1, 2033 January 1, 2041 January 1, 2026 January 1, 2034 July 1, 2041 July 1, 2026 July 1, 2034 January 1, 2042 January 1, 2027 January 1, 2035 July 1, 2042 July 1, 2027 †Maturity * This is the Taxable Rate (as such term is defined in the Indenture) which is subject to conversion to the Tax-Exempt Rate (as such term is defined in the Indenture) pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture. If converted, the Tax- Exempt Rate will be 4.125%. If the Bonds are payable at the Tax-Exempt Rate, after the Date of Taxability following a Determination of Taxability, the interest rate may, at the option of the Owner, be increased to the Taxable Rate, as provided in a written notice of the Owner to the Trustee and the District. Exhibit A Page 2 Exhibit B Page 1 EXHIBIT B TO THE BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE [Closing Date] West Contra Costa Healthcare District 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 Pacific Western Bank 9701 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Re: $___________ West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) Ladies and Gentlemen: We have acted as special counsel to the West Contra Costa Healthcare District (the “District”) in connection with the issuance by the District of its $________ West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) (the “Bonds”), pursuant to that certain Indenture, dated as of June 1, 2019, by and between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. As used herein, “Parcel Tax Revenues” means all of the revenues generated from parcel taxes levied pursuant to Measure D, approved by the voters of the District at the special election held on June 8, 2004, as described in section 5451.5 of the California Government Code. A. Opinion Requested You have requested our opinion as to whether, if the District were to become the debtor in a case under the United States Bankruptcy Code (Title 11, U.S.C.) (the “Bankruptcy Code”) commenced after the date hereof, the court would hold that the lien described in section 5451.5 of the California Government Code on Parcel Tax Revenues is a “statutory lien” within the meaning of section 101(53) of the Bankruptcy Code, so that section 552(a) of the Bankruptcy Code would not in and of itself cause Parcel Tax Revenues acquired by the District after the commencement of such case to not be subject to such lien. Our opinion is based solely upon our examination of such matters of law as we have deemed necessary for purposes of rendering such opinion. We have not made any investigation of any factual matter. B. Analysis 1. Statutory Lien Section 5451.5 of the California Government Code provides that: (a) All obligations of the West Contra Costa Healthcare District in connection with any and all certificates of participation executed and delivered Exhibit B Page 2 by or on behalf of the district between June 8, 2004, and December 31, 2012, including certificates of participation executed and delivered before January 1, 2035, to refund those certificates of participation, shall be secured by a statutory lien on all of the revenues generated from parcel taxes levied pursuant to Measure D, approved by the voters of the district at the special election held on June 8, 2004. (b) This lien shall arise automatically without the need for any action or authorization by the district or the board of directors of the district. The lien shall be valid and binding from the time the certificates of participation are executed and delivered. (c) The parcel tax revenue shall immediately be subject to this lien, and the lien shall immediately attach to the parcel tax revenue and be effective, binding, and enforceable against the district, its successors, purchasers of those revenues, creditors, and all others asserting rights therein, irrespective of whether those parties have notice of the lien and without the need for any physical delivery, recordation, filing, or further act. Section 101(37) of the Bankruptcy Code states that “[t]he term ‘lien’ means charge against or interest in property to secure payment of a debt or performance of an obligation.” Section 101(53) provides that: The term “statutory lien” means lien arising solely by force of a statute on specified circumstances or conditions, or lien of distress for rent, whether or not statutory, but does not include security interest or judicial lien, whether or not such interest or lien is provided by or is dependent on a statute and whether or not such interest or lien is made fully effective by statute. Section 101(36) states that “[t]he term ‘judicial lien’ means lien obtained by judgment, levy, sequestration, or other legal or equitable process or proceeding.” Section 101(51) provides that “[t]he term ‘security interest’ means lien created by an agreement.” A leading bankruptcy commentator summarizes the effect of these definitions: “If the lien arises by force of statute, without any prior consent between the parties or judicial action, it will be deemed a statutory lien.” 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 101.53 at 101- 206 (16th ed. 2011). This summary is confirmed by the legislative history for Section 101: Paragraph (27) defines “lien.” The definition is new and is very broad. A lien is defined as a charge against or interest in property to secure payment of a debt or performance of an obligation. It includes inchoate liens. In general, the concept of lien is divided into three kinds of liens: judicial liens, security interests, and statutory liens. Those three categories are mutually exclusive and are exhaustive except for certain common law liens. Paragraphs (35) and (36) define “security agreements” and “security interest.” A security interest is one of the kinds of liens. It is a lien created by an agreement. Security agreement is defined as the agreement creating the security interest. Exhibit B Page 3 Paragraph (37) defines another kind of lien, “statutory lien.” The definition, derived from current law, states that a statutory lien is a lien arising solely by force of statute on specified circumstances or conditions, and includes a lien of distress for rent (whether statutory, common law, or otherwise). The definition excludes judicial liens and security interests, whether or not they are provided for or are dependent on a statute, and whether or not they are made fully effective by statute. A statutory lien is the only one that arises automatically, and is not based on an agreement to give a lien or on judicial action. Mechanics’, materialmen’s and warehousemen’s liens are examples. Tax liens are also included in the definition of statutory lien. H.R. Rpt. No. 95-595 at 312, 314 (1977). To the same effect is S. Rpt. 95-989 at 25-27 (1978). In the words of the legislative history, a statutory lien is only one that arises automatically, and is not based on an agreement to give a lien or on judicial action. There are few bankruptcy cases considering the difference between a statutory lien and a security interest in the context of a financing. There are even fewer cases considering this question in the context of a municipal bankruptcy under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code. The issue was, however, litigated in the bankruptcy of Orange County. The Bankruptcy Court in the bankruptcy of Orange County held that certain secured notes issued by Orange County pursuant to Sections 53852 and 53856 of the California Government Code were not secured by a statutory lien: “The lien is not statutory because it does not arise solely by force of the statute. The County had to decide to pledge its revenues and designate the specific revenues that would secure the [notes].” In re County of Orange, 179 B.R. 185, 194 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1995). On appeal, the District Court reversed. In re County of Orange, 189 B.R. 499 (C.D. Cal. 1995). The District Court noted that “[t]he difference between statutory liens and security interests is sometimes obscure.” 189 B.R. at 502. The District Court concluded, however, that the lien under consideration was a statutory lien: “Section 53856 permits the County to decide whether to pledge, and what to pledge. But the statute itself imposes the pledge, without further action by the County. The County has no choice of the type of lien or its terms.” 189 B.R. at 503. The decision of the District Court was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, but the parties settled while the appeal was pending. Thus, it difficult to regard the legal issues as having been definitively resolved in the Orange County litigation. Section 5451.5 of the California Government Code does not permit the District to choose whether to pledge or what to pledge. Instead it provides that all obligations of the District in connection with specified certificates of participation shall be secured by a lien on the Parcel Tax Revenues. This lien arises regardless of the terms of any agreement that the District may enter into. Exhibit B Page 4 2. Section 552(a) Section 552(a) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that: Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, property acquired by the estate or by the debtor after the commencement of the case is not subject to any lien resulting from any security agreement entered into by the debtor before the commencement of the case. Section 101(50) states that “[t]he term ‘security agreement’ means agreement that creates or provides for a security interest.” The legislative history to Section 101(50) notes that “[s]ecurity agreement is defined as the agreement creating the security interest.” H.R. Rpt. No. 95-595 at 314 (1977). To the same effect is S. Rpt. 95-989 at 26 (1978). A leading bankruptcy commentator summarizes the effect of section 552(a) as follows: “Because it is grounded in the Bankruptcy Code’s definition of ‘security interest,’ found in section 101, subsection (a) is confined to consensual liens and does not extend to nonconsensual or statutory liens.” 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 552.01[2] at 552-5 (16th ed. 2011) (citing United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc., 489 U.S. 235, 242 n. 5 (1989)). Both the Bankruptcy Court and the District Court in the Orange County bankruptcy agreed that section 552(a) applies only to consensual liens and thus that if the lien under consideration were a statutory lien, then section 552(a) would have no effect on it. “Section 552(a), therefore, only applies to liens created by a security agreement and not to other types of liens.” 179 B.R. at 192 (footnote omitted). “By its terms, section 552(a) only applies to liens resulting from security agreements, not other types of liens such as statutory liens.” 189 B.R. at 502. C. Opinions Based on and subject to the foregoing, as well as the limitations set forth below and the further qualification that there is no case directly on point, it is our opinion that, if the District were to become a debtor in a case under the Bankruptcy Code commenced after the date hereof, and the matter were properly briefed and presented to a federal court with jurisdiction over such bankruptcy case, the court, exercising reasonable judgment after full consideration of all relevant factors, would hold that the lien described in section 5451.5 of the California Government Code on Parcel Tax Revenues is a “statutory lien’’ within the meaning of section 101(53) of the Bankruptcy Code, so that Section 552(a) of the Bankruptcy Code would not in and of itself cause Parcel Tax Revenues acquired by the District after the commencement of such case to not be subject to such lien. It is our opinion that, notwithstanding the phrase “including certificates of participation executed and delivered before January 1, 2035, to refund [the District’s 2011 and 2011 Certificates of Participation” [emphasis added], the intent of such phrase was not to limit the ability to issue other obligations, such as the Bonds, but was merely using the same term as the obligations it permitted to be refunded. D. Exceptions and Limitations We express no opinion as (a) to any matter not governed by the Bankruptcy Code, or any matter governed by any provision of the Bankruptcy Code other than Sections 101 and 552(a), any lien other than the lien described in Section 5451.5 of the California Government Code, any collateral other than the Parcel Tax Revenues, or (d) any obligations other than the Exhibit B Page 5 obligations of the District in connection with the Bonds. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, we express no opinion as to the scope or applicability of the automatic stay of sections 362 and 922 of the Bankruptcy Code. We also express no opinion as to whether the District is eligible to be a debtor in a case under the Bankruptcy Code. See generally 11 U.S.C. § 109(c); Cal. Govt. Code § 53760; Chapter 675 of the California Statutes of 2011. We express no opinion as to any matter arising in in the District’s recent bankruptcy case. It is commonly understood, without any express statement, that opinion letters are necessarily technical and are informed by customary practice and usage. Thus, this opinion letter should not be used or relied on except in consultation with counsel. In particular, it is understood that an opinion letter is not a guaranty of an outcome but rather only an expression of professional judgment and that, in an actual case, a court could reach a different conclusion. Opinions on bankruptcy or other insolvency matters, moreover, are understood to have additional inherent limitations that do not exist in other legal opinions. These limitations arise, for instance, from the expansive equitable powers that courts can exercise in bankruptcy or other insolvency proceedings. See, e.g., United States v. Energy Resources Co., 495 U.S. 545, 549 (1990) (recognizing “the traditional understanding that bankruptcy courts, as courts of equity, have broad authority to modify creditor-debtor relationships”); Pepper v. Litton, 308 U.S. 295, 304-05 (1939) (highlighting that equitable powers have been employed in bankruptcy “to the end that fraud will not prevail, that substance will not give way to form, that technical considerations will not prevent substantial justice from being done”); SEC v. Great White Marine & Recreation, Inc., 428 F.3d 553, 556 (5th Cir. 2005) (confirming that a district court “has broad powers and wide discretion in equitable distributions,” including the authority to alter the priority of claims). These limitations may apply with greater force in the case of a municipal bankruptcy under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code than in a bankruptcy case under Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 because of the scarcity of reported decisions under Chapter 9, the relative infrequency of Chapter 9 cases, and the substantial deference that a court may accord to the need of a governmental entity to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. Especially because of the fundamental nature of the bankruptcy and insolvency processes, the risk of uncertain outcomes in actual cases cannot be eliminated even when an opinion letter is rendered. We express no view as to whether this opinion letter is suitable for your purposes. This opinion letter speaks only as of its date. We have no obligation to update this opinion letter for any change in the law or the facts. This opinion letter may be relied upon solely by the addressee listed on the first page for use in connection with the transactions described in the first paragraph. No one else may rely upon this opinion letter or the opinions expressed herein without our prior written consent. Very truly yours, 23018.05 $___________ WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT June 12, 2019 West Contra Costa Healthcare District 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 Ladies and Gentlemen: Western Alliance Business Trust, a wholly owned affiliate of Western Alliance Bank, an Arizona corporation (the “Purchaser”), offers to enter into this Bond Purchase Agreement (the “Bond Purchase Agreement”) with the West Contra Costa Healthcare District (the “District”), which will be binding upon the District and the Purchaser upon the acceptance hereof by the District. This offer is made subject to its acceptance by the District by execution of this Bond Purchase Agreement and its delivery to the Purchaser on or before 5:00 P.M., California time, on the date hereof. Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as set forth in the Indenture, described below. 1. Purchase and Sale. Upon the terms and conditions and in reliance upon the representations, warranties and covenants herein, the District hereby agrees to sell to the Purchaser and the Purchaser hereby agrees to purchase from the District, $______ principal amount of the $___________ West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) (the “Bonds”), at the purchase price of $___________ (the “Purchase Price”), being the principal amount of the Bonds purchased by the Purchaser. The Purchase Price will be delivered on the Closing Date (as defined in Section 6 below), to U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), on behalf of the District. The District acknowledges and agrees that (i) the purchase and sale of the Bonds pursuant to this Bond Purchase Agreement is an arm’s-length commercial transaction between the District and the Purchaser; (ii) in connection with such transaction, including the process leading thereto, the Purchaser is acting solely as a principal and not as an agent or a fiduciary of the District; (iii) the Purchaser has neither assumed an advisory or fiduciary responsibility in favor of the District with respect to the offering of the Bonds or the process leading thereto (whether or not the Purchaser, or any affiliate of the Purchaser, has advised or is currently advising the District on other matters) nor has it assumed any other obligation to the District except the obligations expressly set forth in this Bond Purchase Agreement, (iv) the Purchaser -2- has financial and other interests that differ from those of the District; and (v) the District has consulted with its own legal and financial advisors to the extent it deemed appropriate in connection with the offering of the Bonds. The Bonds shall be dated the Closing Date, shall bear interest at the rate, shall mature on the date and in the principal amount and shall be subject to redemption, all as set forth in the attached Exhibit A. If the purchase of the Bonds does not close on or before June 27, 2019, the interest rate specified in Exhibit A shall no longer be effective and the Purchaser and the District shall agree on a new rate. The Bonds are being issued pursuant to the provisions of section 53570 et seq. of the California Government Code, a resolution of the District, adopted on June 11, 2019 (the “District Resolution”), and that certain Indenture of Trust, dated as of June 1, 2019 (the “Indenture”), by and between the District and the Trustee. The District’s obligation to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds will be secured by a first and prior lien on the revenues derived by the District from an annual special parcel tax (Measure D 2004) on each taxable parcel of real property within the District (exclusive of parcels for which exemptions have been granted, approved by approximately 84% of the voters of the District at a special election held on June 8, 2004 (the “Authorization”)), on a parity with the District’s outstanding West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2018. The Bonds are being issued for the purpose of (a) providing funds to the District to refund, on an advance basis, (i) the District’s West Contra Costa Healthcare District Certificates of Participation (2011 Financing Program) (the “2011 COPs”), of which $39,535,000 is currently outstanding, and (b) paying the costs of issuing the Bonds. Pursuant to an escrow agreement (the “Escrow Agreement”), by and between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow bank (the “Escrow Bank”), provision will be made for the payment of principal and interest with respect to the 2011 COPs to and including July 1, 2021, and for the redemption of the 2011 COPs in full on such date, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, together with accrued interest to such date. -3- 2. Private Placement. (a) The Purchaser has sufficient knowledge and experience in business and financial matters to enable the Purchaser to evaluate the Bonds, the credit of the District, the collateral and the Bond terms and that the Purchaser will make its own independent credit analysis and decision to purchase the Bonds based on independent examination and evaluation of the transaction and the information deemed appropriate. (b) The Purchaser acknowledges that no credit rating has been sought or obtained with respect to the Bonds. (c) The Purchaser acknowledges that no official statement has been prepared for the Bonds, and that the District will not be entering into a continuing disclosure agreement with respect to the Bonds; provided, however, that the District has agreed to provide certain ongoing information to the Purchaser. (d) The Purchaser states that (a) it is a wholly affiliate of a commercial bank with total assets of at least $50 million; (b) it is capable of evaluating investment independently; (c) it is exercising independent judgment in evaluating (i) the recommendation of Piper Jaffray & Co. (the “Placement Agent”) or its associated persons; and (ii) the quality of execution of the Purchaser’s transactions by the Placement Agent; and (c) the Purchaser has timely access to material information that is available publicly through established industry sources as defined in Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (MSRB) Rule G-47; (e) The Purchaser is purchasing the Bonds solely for its own account , and not with a view to, or in connection with, any distribution, resale, pledging, fractionalization, subdivision or other disposition thereof (subject to the understanding that disposition of Purchaser’s property will remain at all times within its control). The Purchaser has directed that no CUSIP number shall be obtained for the Bonds or that the Bonds be DTC eligible as of their initial purchase. (f) The Purchaser understands that the Bonds (i) have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and (ii) have not been registered or qualified under any state securities or “Blue Sky” laws, and that the Indenture has not been qualified under the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended. (g) The Purchaser has been furnished with and has examined the Bonds, the Indenture and other documents, certificates and the legal opinions delivered in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. (h) The Purchaser understands that the District and the Placement Agent and their respective counsel and Bond Counsel will rely upon the accuracy and truthfulness of the representations and warranties contained herein and hereby consents to such reliance. (i) The interest rates on the Bonds are reasonable based upon current market conditions and there is no “blending” of the two rates. 3. Representations, Warranties and Agreements of the District. The District represents and warrants to the Purchaser that, as of the Closing Date: (a) The District is a local health care district, organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the “State”), and is authorized, among other things, (i) to issue the Bonds, and (ii) to secure the Bonds in the manner contemplated by the Indenture. -4- (b) The District has the full right, power and authority (i) to adopt the District Resolution, (ii) to enter into the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement and this Bond Purchase Agreement, (iii) to issue, sell and deliver the Bonds to the Purchaser as provided herein, and (iv) to carry out and consummate all other transactions on its part contemplated by each of the aforesaid documents, and the District has complied with all provisions of applicable law and the Authorization in all matters relating to such transactions. (c) The District has duly authorized (i) the execution and delivery of the Bonds and the execution, delivery and due performance by the District of this Bond Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement and the Indenture, and (ii) the taking of any and all such action as may be required on the part of the District to carry out, give effect to and consummate the transactions on its part contemplated by such instruments. All consents or approvals necessary to be obtained by the District in connection with the foregoing have been received, including, but not limited to, all authorizations, if any, required by its bankruptcy settlement order and the consents or approvals so received are still in full force and effect. (d) The Bonds, when issued, authenticated and delivered in accordance with the District Resolution and the Indenture, and sold to the Purchaser as provided herein, will constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of the District, enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, except as enforcement thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium or similar laws or equitable principles relating to or limiting creditors' rights generally, the application of equitable principles, the exercise of judicial discretion and the limitations on legal remedies against public entities in the State, and are entitled to the benefits of the laws of the State, the Indenture and the District Resolution. (e) Neither the execution and delivery by the District of the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement, this Bond Purchase Agreement and of the Bonds nor the consummation of the transactions on the part of the District contemplated herein or therein or the compliance with the provisions hereof or thereof will conflict with, or constitute on the part of the District a violation of, or a breach of or default under, (i) any statute, indenture, mortgage, note or other agreement or instrument to which the District is a party or by which it is bound, (ii) any provision of the State Constitution or the Authorization, or (iii) any existing law, rule, regulation, ordinance, judgment, order or decree to which the District (or the members of the District or any of its officers in their respective capacities as such) is subject. (f) The District has never been in default at any time, as to principal of or interest on any obligation which it has issued except as otherwise specifically disclosed to the Purchaser; and the District has not entered into any contract or arrangement of any kind which might give rise to any lien or encumbrance on the Parcel Tax Revenues pledged to the payment of the Bonds except as otherwise specifically disclosed to the Purchaser. (g) Except as otherwise specifically disclosed in writing to the Purchaser, there is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation, at law or in equity, before or by any court, public board or body, which has been served on the District or, to the best knowledge of the District, threatened, which in any way questions the powers of the District referred to in paragraph (b) above, or the validity of any proceeding taken by the District in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, or wherein an unfavorable decision, ruling or finding could materially adversely affect the transactions contemplated by this Bond Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement or the Indenture, or which, in any way, could adversely affect the validity or enforceability of the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement, the Bonds or this Bond Purchase Agreement or, to the knowledge of the District, which in any way questions the exclusion from gross income of the recipients thereof the interest on the Bonds for federal income tax purposes -5- or in any other way questions the status of the Bonds under federal or state tax laws or regulations or which in any way could materially adversely affect the availability of Parcel Tax Revenues. (h) The financial statements of, and other financial information regarding the District relating to the receipts, expenditures and cash balances of revenues by the District as of December 31, 2018, fairly represent the receipts, expenditures and cash balances of such amounts and, insofar as presented, other funds of the District as of the dates and for the periods therein set forth. The financial statements of the District have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles consistently applied. There has not been any materially adverse change in the financial condition of the District or in its operations since December 31, 2018, and there has been no occurrence, circumstance or combination thereof which is reasonably expected to result in any such materially adverse change. (i) During the period of time that the Bonds are outstanding, the District hereby covenants and agrees to furnish or cause to be furnished to the Purchaser, at the District’s expense, within nine (9) months after the end of the District’s fiscal year, (i) the audited financial statements of the District for that year, (ii) the District’s assessed valuation for the current fiscal year and (iii) the District’s parcel tax levy for the current fiscal year. (j) Any certificate signed by any official of the District and delivered to the Purchaser in connection with the offer or sale of the Bonds shall be deemed a representation, covenant and warranty by the District to the Purchaser as to the truth of the statements therein contained. (k) The District has not been notified of any listing or proposed listing by the Internal Revenue Service to the effect that it is a bond issuer whose arbitrage certifications may not be relied upon. (l) The Bonds shall not be registered or otherwise qualified under any Blue Sky or other securities laws. (m) All authorizations, approvals, licenses, permits, consents, elections, and orders of or filings with any governmental authority, legislative body, board, agency or commission having jurisdiction in the matters which are required by the Closing Date for the due authorization of, which would constitute a condition precedent to or the absence of which would adversely affect the due performance by the District of, its obligations in connection with the Indenture have been duly obtained or made and are in full force and effect. (n) Between the date of this Bond Purchase Agreement and the Closing Date, the District will not offer or issue any bonds, notes or other obligations for borrowed money not previously disclosed to the Purchaser. (o) The District will apply the proceeds of the Bonds in accordance with the Indenture and any related documents. (p) To the extent the District has or hereafter may acquire under any applicable law any rights to immunity from legal proceedings on the grounds of sovereignty, the District hereby waives, to the extent permitted by law, such rights to immunity for itself in respect of its obligations arising under or related to the Indenture or this Bond Purchase Agreement. 4. Closing. On June 27, 2019, or at such other date and times as shall have been mutually agreed upon by the District and the Purchaser (the “Closing Date”), the District will deliver or cause to be delivered the Bonds to the Purchaser, and the District shall deliver or cause to be -6- delivered to the Purchaser the certificates, opinions and documents hereinafter mentioned, each of which shall be dated as of the Closing Date. The activities relating to the execution and delivery of the Bonds, opinions and other instruments as described in Section 8 of this Bond Purchase Agreement shall occur on the Closing Date. The delivery of the certificates, opinions and documents as described herein shall be made at the offices Quint & Thimmig LLP, in Larkspur, California (“Bond Counsel”), or at such other place as shall have been mutually agreed upon by the District and the Purchaser. Such delivery is herein called the “Closing.” The Bonds will be prepared and physically delivered to the Purchaser on the Closing Date in the form of a separate single fully registered bond. The Bonds will be authenticated by the Trustee in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Indenture. The Purchaser will pay the Purchase Price of the Bonds by delivering to the Trustee, for the account of the District a wire transfer in federal funds of the Purchase Price payable to the order of the Trustee. 5. Closing Conditions. The obligations of the Purchaser hereunder shall be subject to the performance by the District of its obligations hereunder at or prior to the Closing Date and are also subject to the following conditions: (a) the representations, warranties and covenants of the District contained herein shall be true and correct in all material respects as of the Closing Date; (b) as of the Closing Date, there shall have been no material adverse change in the financial condition of the District; (c) as of the Closing Date, all official action of the District relating to this Bond Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement and the Indenture shall be in full force and effect; (d) as of the Closing Date, the Purchaser shall receive the following certificates, opinions and documents, in each case satisfactory in form and substance to the Purchaser: (i) a copy of the Indenture, as duly executed and delivered by the District and the Trustee; (ii) a copy of the Escrow Agreement, as duly executed and delivered by the District and the Escrow Bank; (iii) an opinion of Bond Counsel, in form acceptable to the Purchaser, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the District, with reliance letters addressed to the Purchaser and to the Trustee; (iv) a certificate, dated the Closing Date, of the District executed by the Executive Director (or other duly appointed officer of the District authorized by the District by resolution of the District) to the effect that (A) there is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation at law or in equity before or by any court, public board or body which has been served on the District or, to the knowledge of the District, threatened against or affecting the District to restrain or enjoin the District’s participation in, or in any way contesting the existence of the District or the powers of the District with respect to, the transactions contemplated by this Bond Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement or the Indenture, and consummation of such transactions; and (B) the representations and warranties of the District contained in this Bond Purchase Agreement are true and correct in all material respects, and the District has complied with all agreements and -7- covenants and satisfied all conditions to be satisfied at or prior to the Closing Date as contemplated by the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement and this Bond Purchase Agreement; (v) an opinion of counsel to the District, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the District and the Purchaser to the effect that: (A) the District is a local healthcare district, organized and existing under the laws of the State; (B) the District has full legal power and lawful authority to enter into the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement and this Bond Purchase Agreement; (C) the District Resolution has been duly adopted at a meeting of the governing body of the District, which was called and held pursuant to the law and with all public notice required by law and at which a quorum was present and acting throughout and the District Resolution is in full force and effect and has not been modified, amended or rescinded; (D) the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement and this Bond Purchase Agreement have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the District and, assuming due authorization, execution and delivery by the other parties thereof, constitute the valid, legal and binding agreements of the District enforceable in accordance with their terms; and (E) Except as otherwise specifically disclosed to the Purchaser, there is no litigation, action, suit, proceeding or investigation (or any basis therefor) at law or in equity before or by any court, governmental agency or body, pending by way of a summons served against the District or, to our knowledge, threatened against the District, challenging the creation, organization or existence of the District, or the validity of the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement or this Bond Purchase Agreement or seeking to restrain or enjoin any of the transactions referred to therein or contemplated thereby or contesting the authority of the District to enter into or perform its obligations under the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement or this Bond Purchase Agreement, or under which a determination adverse to the District would have a material adverse effect upon the availability of Parcel Tax Revenues, or which, in any manner, questions the right of the District to enter into, and perform under, the Indenture, the Escrow Agreement or this Bond Purchase Agreement; (vi) an opinion of counsel to the Trustee, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the District and the Purchaser, to the effect that: (A) The Trustee is a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, having full power to enter into, accept and administer the trust created under the Indenture; (B) The Indenture has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Trustee and the Indenture constitutes a legal, valid and binding obligation of the Trustee enforceable in accordance with its terms, except as enforcement thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or other laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and by the application of equitable principles, if equitable remedies are sought; and -8- (C) No consent, approval, authorization or other action by any governmental or regulatory authority having jurisdiction over the Trustee that has not been obtained is or will be required for the execution and delivery of the Indenture or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Indenture; (vii) an opinion of counsel to the Escrow Bank, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the District and the Purchaser, to the effect that: (A) The Escrow Bank is a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, having full power to enter into, accept and administer the its obligations under the Escrow Agreement; (B) The Escrow Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Escrow Bank and the Escrow Agreement constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Escrow Bank enforceable in accordance with their respective terms, except as enforcement thereof may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency or other laws affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally and by the application of equitable principles, if equitable remedies are sought; and (C) No consent, approval, authorization or other action by any governmental or regulatory authority having jurisdiction over the Escrow Bank that has not been obtained is or will be required for the execution and delivery of the Escrow Agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Escrow Agreement; (viii) a certificate, dated the Closing Date, of the Trustee, signed by a duly authorized officer of the Trustee, to the effect that (A) the Trustee is duly organized and validly existing as a national banking association, with full corporate power to undertake the trust of the Indenture; (B) the Trustee has duly authorized, executed and delivered the Indenture and by all proper corporate action has authorized the acceptance of the trust of the Indenture; and (C) to the best of such officer’s knowledge, there is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation at law or in equity before or by any court, public board or body which has been served on the Trustee (either in state or federal courts), or to the knowledge of the Trustee which would restrain or enjoin the execution or delivery of the Indenture, or which would affect the validity or enforceability of the Indenture, or the Trustee’s participation in, or in any way contesting the powers or the authority of the Trustee with respect to, the transactions contemplated by the Indenture, or any other agreement, document or certificate related to such transactions; (ix) a certificate, dated the Closing Date, of the Escrow Bank, signed by a duly authorized officer of the Escrow Bank, to the effect that (A) the Escrow Bank is duly organized and validly existing as a national banking association, with full corporate power to undertake its obligations under the Escrow Agreement; (B) the Escrow Bank has duly authorized, executed and delivered the Escrow Agreement and by all proper corporate action has authorized the acceptance of its obligations under the Escrow Agreement; and (C) to the best of such officer’s knowledge, there is no action, suit, proceeding or investigation at law or in equity before or by any court, public board or body which has been served on the Escrow Bank (either in state or federal courts), or to -9- the knowledge of the Escrow Bank which would restrain or enjoin the execution or delivery of the Escrow Agreement, or which would affect the validity or enforceability of the Escrow Agreement, or the Escrow Bank’s participation in, or in any way contesting the powers or the authority of the Escrow Bank with respect to, the transactions contemplated by the Escrow Agreement, or any other agreement, document or certificate related to such transactions; (x) a supplemental opinion of Bond Counsel, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the District and the Purchaser, to the effect that: (A) this Bond Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement have been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the District and, assuming the valid execution and delivery by the other parties thereto, are valid and binding upon the District, subject to the laws relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization of creditors’ rights generally and to the application of equitable principles; and (B) the Bonds are exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(2) of the Securities Act and the Indenture are exempt from qualification pursuant to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended; (xi) an Arbitrage Certificate in the form satisfactory to Bond Counsel; (xii) a certified copy of the District Resolution; (xiii) the specimen Bond; (xiv) evidence of required filings with the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission; (xv) the defeasance opinion of Bond Counsel with respect to the 2011 COPs, dated the Closing Date and addressed to the District, the Trustee, the Escrow Bank and the Purchaser, in form and substance satisfactory to the Purchaser; (xvi) the opinion of Bond Counsel relating to certain bankruptcy matters, addressed to District and the Purchaser, substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B; and (xvii) such additional legal opinions, certificates, instruments and other documents as the Purchaser may reasonably deem necessary to evidence the truth and accuracy as of the time of the Closing Date of the representations and warranties of the District contained in this Bond Purchase Agreement and the due performance or satisfaction by the District at or prior to such time of all agreements then to be performed and all conditions then to be satisfied by the District pursuant to this Bond Purchase Agreement. 6. Termination. The Purchaser shall have the right to cancel its obligations to purchase the Bonds if between the date hereof and the Closing Date: (a) legislation shall have been enacted, or considered for enactment with an effective date prior to the Closing Date, or a decision by a court of the United States shall have been rendered, the effect of which is that of the Bonds, including any underlying obligations, or the Indenture, as the case may be, is not exempt from the registration, qualification or other requirements of the Securities Act and as then in effect, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as -10- amended and as then in effect, or the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended and as then in effect; or (b) a stop order, ruling, regulation or offering circular by the Securities and Exchange Commission or any other governmental agency having jurisdiction of the subject matter shall have been issued or made or any other event occurs, the effect of which is that the issuance, offering or sale of the Bonds, including any underlying obligations, or the execution of the Indenture, as contemplated hereby, is or would be in violation of any provisions of the federal securities laws, including the Securities Act and as then in effect, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and as then in effect, or the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended and as then in effect; or (c) there shall have occurred any outbreak of hostilities or any national or international calamity or crisis, including a financial crisis, the effect of which on the financial markets of the United States is such as, in the reasonable judgment of the Purchaser, would materially adversely affect the Bonds; or (d) there shall be in force a general suspension of trading on the New York Stock Exchange, the effect of which on the financial markets of the United States is such as, in the reasonable judgment of the Purchaser, would materially adversely affect the Bonds; or (e) a general banking moratorium shall have been declared by federal, New York or California authorities; or (f) any proceeding shall be pending or threatened by the Securities and Exchange Commission against the District; or (g) additional material restrictions not in force as of the date hereof shall have been imposed upon trading in securities generally by any governmental authority or by any national securities exchange; or (h) the New York Stock Exchange or other national securities exchange, or any governmental or regulatory authority, shall impose, as to the Bonds or obligations of the general character of the Bonds, any material restrictions not now in force, or increase materially those now in force, with respect to the extension of credit by, or the charge to the net capital requirements of the Purchaser; or (i) any change, which in the reasonable opinion of the Purchaser, materially adversely affects the Bonds or, the financial condition of the District. 7. Contingency of Obligations. The obligations of the District hereunder are subject to the performance by the Purchaser of its obligations hereunder. 8. Duration of Representations, Warranties, Agreements and Covenants. All representations, warranties, agreements and covenants of the District shall remain operative and in full force and effect, regardless of any investigations made by or on behalf of the Purchaser or the District and shall survive the Closing Date. 9. Expenses. The District will pay or cause to be paid all reasonable expenses incident to the performance of its obligations under this Bond Purchase Agreement, including, but not limited to, mailing or delivery of the Bonds, costs of printing the Bonds, the fees and disbursements of the Trustee, the Placement Agent, its financial advisor, Bond Counsel, the Purchaser, counsel to the Purchaser and counsel to the District, the fees and expenses of the -11- District’s accountants and fiscal consultants and the reporting fee to the California Debt and Investment Advisory Commission. In the event this Bond Purchase Agreement shall terminate because of the default of the Purchaser, the District will, nevertheless, pay, or cause to be paid, all of the expenses specified above. The Purchaser shall have no responsibility for any costs or expenses associated with the Bonds including, but not limited to, the expenses identified above. 10. Notices. Any notice or other communication to be given to the District under this Bond Purchase Agreement may be given by delivering the same in writing to its Executive Director, West Contra Costa Healthcare District, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553, and any notice or other communication to be given to the Purchaser under this Bond Purchase Agreement may be given by delivering the same in writing to Western Alliance Business Trust, c/o Western Alliance Bank, an Arizona corporation, One East Washington Street, Suite 100, Phoenix, AZ 85004, Attention: Municipal Finance. 11. Parties in Interest. This Bond Purchase Agreement is made solely for the benefit of the District and the Purchaser (including the successors or assigns of the Purchaser) and no other person, including any purchaser of the Bonds, shall acquire or have any right hereunder or by virtue hereof. 12. Governing Law. This Bond Purchase Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California applicable to contracts made and performed in California. 13. Headings. The headings of the paragraphs of this Bond Purchase Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not be deemed to be a part hereof. 14. Severability. In case any one or more of the provisions contained herein shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof. 15. Effectiveness. This Bond Purchase Agreement shall become effective upon acceptance hereof by the District. 16. Judicial Reference. The provisions of Section 13.15 of the Indenture relating to judicial reference shall be incorporated herein by reference. -12- 15. Counterparts. This Bond Purchase Agreement may be executed in several counterparts which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Very truly yours, WESTERN ALLIANCE BUSINESS TRUST, a wholly owned affiliate of Western Alliance Bank, an Arizona corporation, as Purchaser By Name Title Accepted and agreed to as of the date first above written: WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT By Name Title Approved as to form by District Counsel: By Mark Schieble, Foley & Lardner LLP [West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt)] Exhibit A Page 1 EXHIBIT A TO THE BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE $___________ WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) MATURITY SCHEDULE Maturity Date Principal Interest (July 1) Amount Rate 2042 $___________ 5.000%* REDEMPTION PROVISIONS Optional Redemption of Bonds. The Bonds are subject to redemption, at the option of the District on any date, as a whole or in part, from any available source of funds, at a redemption price equal to the principal amount thereof, together with accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption, without premium Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption of Bonds. Subject to a variation in the sinking fund schedule redemption selected by the Original Purchasers in connection with the conversion of interest on the Bonds to the Tax-Exempt Rate pursuant to the Indenture, the Bonds are subject to mandatory sinking fund redemption on January 1 and July 1 in each year, on the dates and in the amounts specified in the following table. Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Mandatory Sinking Fund Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Sinking Fund Payment Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount Payment Date Amount January 1, 2020 January 1, 2028 July 1, 2035 July 1, 2020 July 1, 2028 January 1, 2036 January 1, 2021 January 1, 2029 July 1, 2036 July 1, 2021 July 1, 2029 January 1, 2037 January 1, 2022 January 1, 2030 July 1, 2037 July 1, 2022 July 1, 2030 January 1, 2038 January 1, 2023 January 1, 2031 July 1, 2038 July 1, 2023 July 1, 2031 January 1, 2039 January 1, 2024 January 1, 2032 July 1, 2039 July 1, 2024 July 1, 2032 January 1, 2040 January 1, 2025 January 1, 2033 July 1, 2040 July 1, 2025 July 1, 2033 January 1, 2041 January 1, 2026 January 1, 2034 July 1, 2041 July 1, 2026 July 1, 2034 January 1, 2042 January 1, 2027 January 1, 2035 July 1, 2042 July 1, 2027 †Maturity * This is the Taxable Rate (as such term is defined in the Indenture) which is subject to conversion to the Tax-Exempt Rate (as such term is defined in the Indenture) pursuant to the provisions of the Indenture. If converted, the Tax- Exempt Rate will be 4.125%. If the Bonds are payable at the Tax-Exempt Rate, after the Date of Taxability following a Determination of Taxability, the interest rate may, at the option of the Owner, be increased to the Taxable Rate, as provided in a written notice of the Owner to the Trustee and the District. Exhibit A Page 2 Exhibit B Page 1 EXHIBIT B TO THE BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE [Closing Date] West Contra Costa Healthcare District 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 Western Alliance Business Trust One East Washington Street, Suite 100 Phoenix, AZ 85004 Re: $___________ West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) Ladies and Gentlemen: We have acted as special counsel to the West Contra Costa Healthcare District (the “District”) in connection with the issuance by the District of its $________ West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) (the “Bonds”), pursuant to that certain Indenture, dated as of June 1, 2019, by and between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee. As used herein, “Parcel Tax Revenues” means all of the revenues generated from parcel taxes levied pursuant to Measure D, approved by the voters of the District at the special election held on June 8, 2004, as described in section 5451.5 of the California Government Code. A. Opinion Requested You have requested our opinion as to whether, if the District were to become the debtor in a case under the United States Bankruptcy Code (Title 11, U.S.C.) (the “Bankruptcy Code”) commenced after the date hereof, the court would hold that the lien described in section 5451.5 of the California Government Code on Parcel Tax Revenues is a “statutory lien” within the meaning of section 101(53) of the Bankruptcy Code, so that section 552(a) of the Bankruptcy Code would not in and of itself cause Parcel Tax Revenues acquired by the District after the commencement of such case to not be subject to such lien. Our opinion is based solely upon our examination of such matters of law as we have deemed necessary for purposes of rendering such opinion. We have not made any investigation of any factual matter. B. Analysis 1. Statutory Lien Section 5451.5 of the California Government Code provides that: (a) All obligations of the West Contra Costa Healthcare District in connection with any and all certificates of participation executed and delivered Exhibit B Page 2 by or on behalf of the district between June 8, 2004, and December 31, 2012, including certificates of participation executed and delivered before January 1, 2035, to refund those certificates of participation, shall be secured by a statutory lien on all of the revenues generated from parcel taxes levied pursuant to Measure D, approved by the voters of the district at the special election held on June 8, 2004. (b) This lien shall arise automatically without the need for any action or authorization by the district or the board of directors of the district. The lien shall be valid and binding from the time the certificates of participation are executed and delivered. (c) The parcel tax revenue shall immediately be subject to this lien, and the lien shall immediately attach to the parcel tax revenue and be effective, binding, and enforceable against the district, its successors, purchasers of those revenues, creditors, and all others asserting rights therein, irrespective of whether those parties have notice of the lien and without the need for any physical delivery, recordation, filing, or further act. Section 101(37) of the Bankruptcy Code states that “[t]he term ‘lien’ means charge against or interest in property to secure payment of a debt or performance of an obligation.” Section 101(53) provides that: The term “statutory lien” means lien arising solely by force of a statute on specified circumstances or conditions, or lien of distress for rent, whether or not statutory, but does not include security interest or judicial lien, whether or not such interest or lien is provided by or is dependent on a statute and whether or not such interest or lien is made fully effective by statute. Section 101(36) states that “[t]he term ‘judicial lien’ means lien obtained by judgment, levy, sequestration, or other legal or equitable process or proceeding.” Section 101(51) provides that “[t]he term ‘security interest’ means lien created by an agreement.” A leading bankruptcy commentator summarizes the effect of these definitions: “If the lien arises by force of statute, without any prior consent between the parties or judicial action, it will be deemed a statutory lien.” 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 101.53 at 101- 206 (16th ed. 2011). This summary is confirmed by the legislative history for Section 101: Paragraph (27) defines “lien.” The definition is new and is very broad. A lien is defined as a charge against or interest in property to secure payment of a debt or performance of an obligation. It includes inchoate liens. In general, the concept of lien is divided into three kinds of liens: judicial liens, security interests, and statutory liens. Those three categories are mutually exclusive and are exhaustive except for certain common law liens. Paragraphs (35) and (36) define “security agreements” and “security interest.” A security interest is one of the kinds of liens. It is a lien created by an agreement. Security agreement is defined as the agreement creating the security interest. Exhibit B Page 3 Paragraph (37) defines another kind of lien, “statutory lien.” The definition, derived from current law, states that a statutory lien is a lien arising solely by force of statute on specified circumstances or conditions, and includes a lien of distress for rent (whether statutory, common law, or otherwise). The definition excludes judicial liens and security interests, whether or not they are provided for or are dependent on a statute, and whether or not they are made fully effective by statute. A statutory lien is the only one that arises automatically, and is not based on an agreement to give a lien or on judicial action. Mechanics’, materialmen’s and warehousemen’s liens are examples. Tax liens are also included in the definition of statutory lien. H.R. Rpt. No. 95-595 at 312, 314 (1977). To the same effect is S. Rpt. 95-989 at 25-27 (1978). In the words of the legislative history, a statutory lien is only one that arises automatically, and is not based on an agreement to give a lien or on judicial action. There are few bankruptcy cases considering the difference between a statutory lien and a security interest in the context of a financing. There are even fewer cases considering this question in the context of a municipal bankruptcy under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code. The issue was, however, litigated in the bankruptcy of Orange County. The Bankruptcy Court in the bankruptcy of Orange County held that certain secured notes issued by Orange County pursuant to Sections 53852 and 53856 of the California Government Code were not secured by a statutory lien: “The lien is not statutory because it does not arise solely by force of the statute. The County had to decide to pledge its revenues and designate the specific revenues that would secure the [notes].” In re County of Orange, 179 B.R. 185, 194 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1995). On appeal, the District Court reversed. In re County of Orange, 189 B.R. 499 (C.D. Cal. 1995). The District Court noted that “[t]he difference between statutory liens and security interests is sometimes obscure.” 189 B.R. at 502. The District Court concluded, however, that the lien under consideration was a statutory lien: “Section 53856 permits the County to decide whether to pledge, and what to pledge. But the statute itself imposes the pledge, without further action by the County. The County has no choice of the type of lien or its terms.” 189 B.R. at 503. The decision of the District Court was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, but the parties settled while the appeal was pending. Thus, it difficult to regard the legal issues as having been definitively resolved in the Orange County litigation. Section 5451.5 of the California Government Code does not permit the District to choose whether to pledge or what to pledge. Instead it provides that all obligations of the District in connection with specified certificates of participation shall be secured by a lien on the Parcel Tax Revenues. This lien arises regardless of the terms of any agreement that the District may enter into. Exhibit B Page 4 2. Section 552(a) Section 552(a) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that: Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, property acquired by the estate or by the debtor after the commencement of the case is not subject to any lien resulting from any security agreement entered into by the debtor before the commencement of the case. Section 101(50) states that “[t]he term ‘security agreement’ means agreement that creates or provides for a security interest.” The legislative history to Section 101(50) notes that “[s]ecurity agreement is defined as the agreement creating the security interest.” H.R. Rpt. No. 95-595 at 314 (1977). To the same effect is S. Rpt. 95-989 at 26 (1978). A leading bankruptcy commentator summarizes the effect of section 552(a) as follows: “Because it is grounded in the Bankruptcy Code’s definition of ‘security interest,’ found in section 101, subsection (a) is confined to consensual liens and does not extend to nonconsensual or statutory liens.” 5 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 552.01[2] at 552-5 (16th ed. 2011) (citing United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc., 489 U.S. 235, 242 n. 5 (1989)). Both the Bankruptcy Court and the District Court in the Orange County bankruptcy agreed that section 552(a) applies only to consensual liens and thus that if the lien under consideration were a statutory lien, then section 552(a) would have no effect on it. “Section 552(a), therefore, only applies to liens created by a security agreement and not to other types of liens.” 179 B.R. at 192 (footnote omitted). “By its terms, section 552(a) only applies to liens resulting from security agreements, not other types of liens such as statutory liens.” 189 B.R. at 502. C. Opinions Based on and subject to the foregoing, as well as the limitations set forth below and the further qualification that there is no case directly on point, it is our opinion that, if the District were to become a debtor in a case under the Bankruptcy Code commenced after the date hereof, and the matter were properly briefed and presented to a federal court with jurisdiction over such bankruptcy case, the court, exercising reasonable judgment after full consideration of all relevant factors, would hold that the lien described in section 5451.5 of the California Government Code on Parcel Tax Revenues is a “statutory lien’’ within the meaning of section 101(53) of the Bankruptcy Code, so that Section 552(a) of the Bankruptcy Code would not in and of itself cause Parcel Tax Revenues acquired by the District after the commencement of such case to not be subject to such lien. It is our opinion that, notwithstanding the phrase “including certificates of participation executed and delivered before January 1, 2035, to refund [the District’s 2011 and 2011 Certificates of Participation” [emphasis added], the intent of such phrase was not to limit the ability to issue other obligations, such as the Bonds, but was merely using the same term as the obligations it permitted to be refunded. D. Exceptions and Limitations We express no opinion as (a) to any matter not governed by the Bankruptcy Code, or any matter governed by any provision of the Bankruptcy Code other than Sections 101 and 552(a), any lien other than the lien described in Section 5451.5 of the California Government Code, any collateral other than the Parcel Tax Revenues, or (d) any obligations other than the Exhibit B Page 5 obligations of the District in connection with the Bonds. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, we express no opinion as to the scope or applicability of the automatic stay of sections 362 and 922 of the Bankruptcy Code. We also express no opinion as to whether the District is eligible to be a debtor in a case under the Bankruptcy Code. See generally 11 U.S.C. § 109(c); Cal. Govt. Code § 53760; Chapter 675 of the California Statutes of 2011. We express no opinion as to any matter arising in in the District’s recent bankruptcy case. It is commonly understood, without any express statement, that opinion letters are necessarily technical and are informed by customary practice and usage. Thus, this opinion letter should not be used or relied on except in consultation with counsel. In particular, it is understood that an opinion letter is not a guaranty of an outcome but rather only an expression of professional judgment and that, in an actual case, a court could reach a different conclusion. Opinions on bankruptcy or other insolvency matters, moreover, are understood to have additional inherent limitations that do not exist in other legal opinions. These limitations arise, for instance, from the expansive equitable powers that courts can exercise in bankruptcy or other insolvency proceedings. See, e.g., United States v. Energy Resources Co., 495 U.S. 545, 549 (1990) (recognizing “the traditional understanding that bankruptcy courts, as courts of equity, have broad authority to modify creditor-debtor relationships”); Pepper v. Litton, 308 U.S. 295, 304-05 (1939) (highlighting that equitable powers have been employed in bankruptcy “to the end that fraud will not prevail, that substance will not give way to form, that technical considerations will not prevent substantial justice from being done”); SEC v. Great White Marine & Recreation, Inc., 428 F.3d 553, 556 (5th Cir. 2005) (confirming that a district court “has broad powers and wide discretion in equitable distributions,” including the authority to alter the priority of claims). These limitations may apply with greater force in the case of a municipal bankruptcy under Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code than in a bankruptcy case under Chapter 7 or Chapter 11 because of the scarcity of reported decisions under Chapter 9, the relative infrequency of Chapter 9 cases, and the substantial deference that a court may accord to the need of a governmental entity to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. Especially because of the fundamental nature of the bankruptcy and insolvency processes, the risk of uncertain outcomes in actual cases cannot be eliminated even when an opinion letter is rendered. We express no view as to whether this opinion letter is suitable for your purposes. This opinion letter speaks only as of its date. We have no obligation to update this opinion letter for any change in the law or the facts. This opinion letter may be relied upon solely by the addressee listed on the first page for use in connection with the transactions described in the first paragraph. No one else may rely upon this opinion letter or the opinions expressed herein without our prior written consent. Very truly yours, 23018.05 ESCROW AGREEMENT by and between the WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Escrow Bank Dated June 27, 2019 Relating to the advance refunding of the West Contra Costa Healthcare District Certificates of Participation (2011 Financing Project) ESCROW AGREEMENT This ESCROW AGREEMENT is dated June 27, 2019, by and between the WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT, a local healthcare district organized and existing under the constitution and laws of the State of California (the “District”), and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSSOCIATION, a national banking association organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America, as escrow agent (the “Escrow Bank”); WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the District has heretofore caused the execution and delivery of certificates of participation evidencing direct, undivided fractional interests of the owners thereof in installment payments to be made pursuant to an installment sale agreement with the WCCHD Financing Corporation II (the “Corporation”) in the original principal amount of $40,000,000, of which $39,535,000 is currently outstanding (the “2011 Certificates”), the proceeds of which were used to finance a portion of anticipated working capital expenses and operating losses of the District arising from the District’s operation of the District’s healthcare facilities (the “2011 Project”); WHEREAS, the 2011 Certificates were executed and delivered pursuant to the terms of a trust agreement, dated as of December 1, 2011 (the “2011 Trust Agreement”), by and among the District, the Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “2011 Trustee”); WHEREAS, in order to provide for the repayment of the 2011 Certificates, the District and the Corporation entered into an installment sale agreement, dated as of December 1, 2011 (the “2011 Agreements”), under which the District agreed to make installment payments to the Corporation (the “2011 Payments”) in sufficient amounts each year to pay the full amount of principal and interest with respect to the 2011 Certificates; WHEREAS, the District has determined that, as a result of favorable financial market conditions and for other reasons, it is in the best interest of the District at this time to refinance the District’s obligation to make the 2011 Payments and, as a result thereof, to provide for the payment of the principal and interest with respect to the 2011 Certificates to and including July 1, 2021, and for the redemption of all outstanding 2011 Certificates on July 1, 2021, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, and to that end, the District proposes to issue its $________ West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax-Exempt) (the “2019 Bonds”), pursuant to an indenture of trust, dated as of June 1, 2019 (the “2019 Trust Agreement”), by and between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”); WHEREAS, Article 10 of Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 (commencing with section 53570) of the California Government Code (the “Refunding Bond Law”) authorizes the District to issue refunding bonds for the purpose of refunding obligations of the District; WHEREAS, the District proposes to appoint the Escrow Bank as its agent for the purpose of providing for the payment and redemption of the 2011 Certificates and the Escrow Bank desires to accept said appointment; and WHEREAS, the Escrow Bank has full powers to perform the duties and obligations to be undertaken pursuant to this Escrow Agreement. -2- NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises and of the mutual promises and covenants herein contained and for other valuable consideration, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Definitions. Capitalized terms used, but not otherwise defined, herein, shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the 2011 Trust Agreement. Section 2. Appointment of Escrow Bank. The District hereby appoints the Escrow Bank as escrow agent for all purposes of this Escrow Agreement and in accordance with the terms and provisions of this Escrow Agreement, and the Escrow Bank hereby accepts such appointment. Section 3. Establishment of Escrow Fund. There is hereby created by the District with, and to be held by, the Escrow Bank, as security for the payment of the principal and interest on and redemption price of the 2011 Certificates as hereinafter set forth, an irrevocable escrow to be maintained by the Escrow Bank on behalf of the District and for the benefit of the owners of the 2011 Certificates, said escrow to be designated the “Escrow Fund.” All moneys deposited in the Escrow Fund shall be held as a special fund to provide for the payment of the principal and interest with respect to the 2011 Certificates to and including July 1, 2021, and for the redemption of all outstanding 2011 Certificates on July 1, 2021 (the “Redemption Date”), at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof (the “Redemption Price”) in accordance with the provisions of this Escrow Agreement. Section 4. Deposit into Escrow Fund; Investment of Amounts. (a) Concurrently with delivery of the 2019 Bonds, the District shall cause to be transferred to the Escrow Bank for deposit into the Escrow Fund the amount of $____________ in immediately available funds, derived as follows: (i) $______________ from the proceeds of sale of the 2019 Bonds, (ii) $_____________ from amounts on deposit in the reserve fund created for the 2011 Certificates (the “2011 Reserve Fund”), and (iii) $_____________ from amounts on deposit in the installment payment fund created for the 2011 Certificates (the “2011 Installment Payment Fund”). (b) The Escrow Bank shall invest $___________ of the moneys deposited into the Escrow Fund pursuant to the preceding paragraph in the securities set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein (the “Escrowed Federal Securities”) and shall hold the remaining $_________ in cash, uninvested. The Escrowed Federal Securities and such cash shall be deposited with and held by the Escrow Bank in the Escrow Fund solely for the uses and purposes set forth herein. If the Escrow Bank learns that the Department of the Treasury or the Bureau of Public Debt will not, for any reason, accept a SLGS subscription, the Escrow Bank shall promptly request alternative written investment instructions from the District with respect to escrowed funds which were to be invested in the Escrowed Federal Securities. The Escrow Bank shall follow such instructions and, upon the maturity of any such alternative investment, the Escrow Bank shall hold funds uninvested and without liability for interest until receipt of further written instructions from the District. In the absence of investment instructions from the District the Escrow Bank shall not be responsible for the investment of such funds or interest thereon. The Escrow Bank may conclusively rely upon the District’s selection of an alternative -3- investment as a determination of the alternative investment's legality and suitability and shall not be liable for any losses related to the alternative investments or for compliance with any yield restriction applicable thereto. (c) The Escrow Bank may rely upon the conclusion of Robert Thomas CPA, LLC, as contained in its opinion and accompanying schedules (the “Report”) dated June 27, 2019, that the Escrowed Federal Securities mature and bear interest payable in such amounts and at such times as, together with cash on deposit in the Escrow Fund, will be sufficient to pay the principal and interest with respect to the 2011 Certificates to and including July 1, 2021, and to redeem the outstanding 2011 Certificates in full on the Redemption Date at the Redemption Price. (d) The Escrow Bank shall not be liable or responsible for any loss resulting from its full compliance with the provisions of this Escrow Agreement. (e) Any money left on deposit in the Escrow Fund after payment in full of the 2011 Certificates, and the payment of all amounts due to the Escrow Bank hereunder, shall be applied to the payment of debt service on the Bonds. (f) If at any time the Escrow Bank shall receive actual knowledge that the moneys in the Escrow Fund will not be sufficient to make any payment required hereunder, the Escrow Bank shall notify the District of such fact and the District shall immediately cure such deficiency. The Escrow Bank shall have no liability or responsibility for such insufficiency. Section 5. Instructions as to Application of Deposit. (a) The moneys deposited in the Escrow Fund pursuant to Section 4 shall be applied by the Escrow Bank for the sole purpose of paying the principal of and interest on the 2011 Certificates to and including July 1, 2021, and redeeming the outstanding 2011 Certificates in full on the Redemption Date at the Redemption Price, as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein. (b) The Escrow Bank, in its capacity as 2011 Trustee, is hereby requested, and the Escrow Bank, in its capacity as 2011 Trustee, hereby agrees to give notice on the date hereof of the defeasance of the 2011 Certificates in the form of defeasance notice attached hereto as Exhibit C. (c) The Escrow Bank, in its capacity as 2011 Trustee, is hereby requested, and the Escrow Bank, in its capacity as 2011 Trustee, hereby agrees to give notice of the redemption of the 2011 Certificates in accordance with the applicable provisions of the 2011 Trust Agreement and the form of redemption notice attached hereto as Exhibit D. Section 6. Investment of Any Remaining Moneys. The Escrow Bank shall invest and reinvest the proceeds received from any of the Escrowed Federal Securities, and the cash originally deposited into the Escrow Fund, for a period ending not later than the next succeeding interest payment date relating to the 2011 Certificates, in Defeasance Obligations pursuant to written directions of the District; provided, however, that (a) such written directions of the District shall be accompanied by (i) a certification of an independent certified public accountant or firm of certified public accountants of favorable national reputation experienced in the refunding of obligations of political subdivisions that the Escrowed Federal Securities then to be so deposited in the Escrow Fund, together with the cash then on deposit in the Escrow Fund, together with the interest to be derived therefrom, shall be in an amount at all times at least sufficient to make the payments specified in Section 5 hereof, and (ii) an opinion of nationally recognized bond counsel (“Bond Counsel”) that investment in accordance with -4- such directions will not affect, for Federal income tax purposes, the exclusion from gross income of interest due with respect to the 2011 Certificates, and (b) if the District directs such investment or reinvestment to be made in United States Treasury Securities-State and Local Government Series, the District shall, at its cost, cause to be prepared all necessary subscription forms therefor in sufficient time to enable the Escrow Bank to acquire such securities. In the event that the District shall fail to file any such written directions with the Escrow Bank concerning the reinvestment of any such proceeds, such proceeds shall be held uninvested by the Escrow Bank. Any interest income resulting from investment or reinvestment of moneys pursuant to this Section 6 and not required for the purposes set forth in Section 5, as indicated by such verification, shall, promptly upon the receipt of such interest income by the Escrow Bank, be paid to the District and shall be applied to the payment of debt service on the 2019 Bonds. Section 7. Substitution or Withdrawal of Federal Securities. The District may, at any time, direct the Escrow Bank in writing to substitute Defeasance Obligations for any or all of the Escrowed Federal Securities then deposited in the Escrow Fund, or to withdraw and transfer to the District any portion of the Escrowed Federal Securities then deposited in the Escrow Fund, provided that any such direction and substitution or withdrawal shall be simultaneous and shall be accompanied by (a) a certification of an independent certified public accountant or firm of certified public accountants of favorable national reputation experienced in the refunding of obligations of political subdivisions that the Defeasance Obligations then to be so deposited in the Escrow Fund together with interest to be derived therefrom, or in the case of withdrawal, the Escrowed Federal Securities to be remaining in the Escrow Fund following such withdrawal together with the interest to be derived therefrom, together with the cash then on deposit in the Escrow Fund, shall be in an amount at all times at least sufficient to make the payments specified in Section 5 hereof; and (b) an opinion of Bond Counsel that the substitution or withdrawal will not affect, for Federal income tax purposes, the exclusion from gross income of interest on the 2011 Certificates. In the event that, following any such substitution of Escrowed Federal Securities pursuant to this Section 7, there is an amount of moneys or Escrowed Federal Securities in excess of an amount sufficient to make the payments required by Section 5 hereof, as indicated by such verification, such excess shall be paid to the District and shall be applied to the payment of debt service on the 2019 Bonds. Section 8. Application of 2011 Funds. On the date of deposit of amounts in the Escrow Fund pursuant to Section 4, the Escrow Bank, as 2011 Trustee, is hereby directed to (a) transfer all amounts on deposit in the 2011 Reserve Fund ($________) to the Escrow Fund, (a) transfer all amounts on deposit in the 2011 Installment Payment Fund ($________) to the Escrow Fund. Any amounts remaining in any fund or account created with respect to the 2011 Certificates, including interest earnings received by the 2011 Trustee, shall, after payment of all fees and expenses of the 2011 Trustee, be paid to the Trustee and shall be applied to the payment of debt service on the 2019 Bonds. Section 9. Application of Certain Terms of 2011 Trust Agreement. All of the terms of the 2011 Trust Agreement relating to the making of payments of principal and interest with respect to the 2011 Certificates are incorporated in this Escrow Agreement as if set forth in full herein. The provisions of the 2011 Trust Agreement relating to the limitations from liability and protections afforded the 2011 Trustee and the resignation and removal of the 2011 Trustee are also incorporated in this Escrow Agreement as if set forth in full herein and shall be the procedure to be followed with respect to any resignation or removal of the Escrow Bank hereunder. -5- Section 10. Compensation to Escrow Bank. The District shall pay the Escrow Bank full compensation for its duties under this Escrow Agreement, including out-of-pocket costs such as publication costs, prepayment or redemption expenses, legal fees and other costs and expenses relating hereto. Under no circumstances shall amounts deposited in the Escrow Fund be deemed to be available for said purposes. Section 11. Liabilities and Obligations of Escrow Bank. The Escrow Bank shall have no obligation to make any payment or disbursement of any type or incur any financial liability in the performance of its duties under this Escrow Agreement unless the District shall have deposited sufficient funds with the Escrow Bank. The Escrow Bank may rely and shall be protected in acting upon the written instructions of the District or its agents relating to any matter or action as Escrow Bank under this Escrow Agreement. The Escrow Bank and its respective successors, assigns, agents and servants shall not be held to any personal liability whatsoever, in tort, contract, or otherwise, in connection with the execution and delivery of this Escrow Agreement, the establishment of the Escrow Fund, the acceptance of the moneys deposited therein, the sufficiency of the uninvested moneys held hereunder to accomplish the purposes set forth in Section 4 hereof, or any payment, transfer or other application of moneys by the Escrow Bank in accordance with the provisions of this Escrow Agreement or by reason of any non-negligent act, non-negligent omission or non- negligent error of the Escrow Bank made in good faith in the conduct of its duties. The recitals of fact contained in the “whereas” clauses herein shall be taken as the statement of the District, and the Escrow Bank assumes no responsibility for the correctness thereof. The Escrow Bank makes no representations as to the sufficiency of the uninvested moneys to accomplish the purposes set forth in Section 4 hereof or to the validity of this Escrow Agreement as to the District and, except as otherwise provided herein, the Escrow Bank shall incur no liability in respect thereof. The Escrow Bank shall not be liable in connection with the performance of its duties under this Escrow Agreement except for its own negligence, willful misconduct or default, and the duties and obligations of the Escrow Bank shall be determined by the express provisions of this Escrow Agreement. The Escrow Bank may consult with counsel, who may or may not be counsel to the District, and in reliance upon the written opinion of such counsel shall have full and complete authorization and protection in respect of any action taken, suffered or omitted by it in good faith in accordance therewith. Whenever the Escrow Bank shall deem it necessary or desirable that a matter be proved or established prior to taking, suffering, or omitting any action under this Escrow Agreement, such matter (except the matters set forth herein as specifically requiring a certificate of a nationally recognized firm of independent certified public accountants or an opinion of counsel) may be deemed to be conclusively established by a written certification of the District. Anything in this Escrow Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, in no event shall the Escrow Bank be liable for special, indirect, punitive or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever (including but not limited to lost profits), even if the Escrow Bank has been advised of the likelihood of such loss or damage and regardless of the form of action. The District hereby assumes liability for, and hereby agrees (whether or not any of the transactions contemplated hereby are consummated), to the extent permitted by law, to indemnify, protect, save and hold harmless the Escrow Bank and its respective successors, assigns, agents and servants from and against any and all liabilities, obligations, losses, damages, penalties, claims, actions, suits, costs, expenses and disbursements (including legal fees and disbursements) of whatsoever kind and nature which may be imposed on, incurred by, or asserted against, at any time, the Escrow Bank (whether or not also indemnified against by any other person under any other agreement or instrument) and in any way relating to or arising out of the execution and delivery of this Escrow Agreement, the establishment of the -6- Escrow Fund, the retention of the moneys therein and any payment, transfer or other application of moneys by the Escrow Bank in accordance with the provisions of this Escrow Agreement, or as may arise by reason of any act, omission or error of the Escrow Bank made in good faith in the conduct of its duties; provided, however, that the District shall not be required to indemnify the Escrow Bank against its own negligence or misconduct. The indemnities contained in this Section 9 shall survive the termination of this Escrow Agreement or the resignation or removal of the Escrow Bank. The District acknowledges that to the extent regulations of the Comptroller of the Currency or other applicable regulatory entity grant the District the right to receive brokerage confirmations of security transactions as they occur, the District specifically waives receipt of such confirmations to the extent permitted by law. The Escrow Bank will furnish the District monthly cash transaction statements which include detail for all investment transactions made by the Escrow Bank hereunder. No provision of this Escrow Agreement shall require the Escrow Bank to expend or risk its own funds or otherwise incur any financial liability in the performance or exercise of any of its duties hereunder, or in the exercise of its rights or powers. The Escrow Bank may execute any of the powers hereunder or perform any duties hereunder either directly or by or through agents, attorneys, custodians or nominees appointed with due care and shall not be responsible for any willful misconduct or negligence on the part of any agent, attorney, custodian or nominee so appointed. Section 12. Amendment. This Escrow Agreement may be modified or amended at any time by a supplemental agreement which shall become effective when the written consents of the owners of one hundred percent (100%) in aggregate principal amount of the 2011 Certificates shall have been filed with the Escrow Bank. This Escrow Agreement may be modified or amended at any time by a supplemental agreement, without the consent of any such owners, but only (1) to add to the covenants and agreements of any party, other covenants to be observed, or to surrender any right or power herein or therein reserved to the District, (2) to cure, correct or supplement any ambiguous or defective provision contained herein, (3) in regard to questions arising hereunder or thereunder, as the parties hereto or thereto may deem necessary or desirable and which, in the opinion of counsel, shall not materially adversely affect the interests of the owners of the 2011 Certificates or the 2019 Bonds, and that such amendment will not cause interest on the 2011 Certificates or the 2019 Bonds to become subject to federal income taxation. In connection with any contemplated amendment or revocation of this Escrow Agreement, written notice thereof and draft copies of the applicable legal documents shall be provided by the District to each rating agency then rating the 2011 Certificates. Section 13. Severability. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or provision of this Escrow Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid or unenforceable, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph, sentence clause or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this Escrow Agreement. Notice of any such invalidity or unenforceability shall be provided to each rating agency then rating the 2011 Certificates. Section 14. Notice of Escrow Bank and District. Any notice to or demand upon the Escrow Bank may be served and presented, and such demand may be made, at the Principal Corporate Trust Office of the Escrow Bank as specified by the Escrow Bank as 2011 Trustee in accordance with the provisions of the 2011 Trust Agreement. Any notice to or demand upon the District shall be deemed to have been sufficiently given or served for all purposes by being mailed by first class mail, and deposited, postage prepaid, in a post office letter box, addressed -7- to such party as provided in the 2011 Trust Agreement (or such other address as may have been filed in writing by the District with the Escrow Bank). Section 15. Merger or Consolidation of Escrow Bank. Any company into which the Escrow Bank may be merged or converted or with which it may be consolidated or any company resulting from any merger, conversion or consolidation to which it shall be a party or any company to which the Escrow Bank may sell or transfer all or substantially all of its corporate trust business, provided such company shall be eligible to act as trustee under the 2011 Trust Agreement, shall be the Successor hereunder to the Escrow Bank without the execution or filing of any paper or any further act. Section 16. Execution in Several Counterparts. This Escrow Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original; and all such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. Section 17. Business Days. Whenever any act is required by this Escrow Agreement to be done on a specified day or date, and such day or date shall be a day other than a business day for the Escrow Bank, then such act may be done on the next succeeding business day. Section 18. Governing Law. This Escrow Agreement shall be construed and governed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank} -8- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT has caused this Escrow Agreement to be signed in its name by its Executive Director and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, in token of its acceptance of its obligations created under this Escrow Agreement, has caused this Escrow Agreement to be signed in its name by one of its authorized officers, all as of the day and year first above written. WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT By Executive Director Approved as to form by District Counsel: By Mark Schieble, Foley & Lardner LLP U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Escrow Bank By Authorized Signatory Exhibit A EXHIBIT A SCHEDULE OF ESCROWED FEDERAL SECURITIES Type Maturity Coupon Principal Price Cost Accrued Total Exhibit B EXHIBIT B PAYMENT AND REDEMPTION SCHEDULE Maturing Called Redemption Total Date Principal Principal Interest Premium Payment 07/01/19 $ 85,000 — $1,186,462.50 — $ 1,271,462.50 01/01/20 — — 1,184,868.75 — 1,184,868.75 07/01/20 90,000 — 1,184,868.75 — 1,274,868.75 01/01/21 — — 1,183,068.75 — 1,183,068.75 07/01/21 95,000 $39,265,000 1,183,068.75 — 40,543,068.75 Exhibit C EXHIBIT C FORM OF DEFEASANCE NOTICE West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Certificates of Participation (2011 Financing Program) Issue Maturity Amount Interest CUSIP Date Date Defeased Rate Number 12/29/2011 7/1/2019 $ 85,000 3.750% 952341 AX3 12/29/2011 7/1/2020 90,000 4.000 952341 AY1 12/29/2011 7/1/2021 95,000 4.250 952341 AZ8 12/29/2011 7/1/2026 525,000 5.000 952341 BA2 12/29/2011 7/1/2032 6,890,000 6.000 952341 BB0 12/29/2011 7/1/2037 13,635,000 5.750 952341 BC8 12/29/2011 7/1/2042 18,215,000 6.250 952341 BD6 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, on behalf of the West Contra Costa Healthcare District (the “District”) to the owners of the outstanding West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Certificates of Participation (2011 Financing Program), described above (the “2011 Certificates”), that pursuant to the trust agreement authorizing the execution and delivery of the Certificates (the “Trust Agreement”), the lien of the Trust Agreement with respect to the 2011 Certificates has been discharged through the irrevocable deposit of cash and U.S. Treasury Securities in an escrow fund (the “Escrow Fund”). The Escrow Fund has been established and is being maintained pursuant to that certain Escrow Agreement, dated June 27, 2019, by and between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow bank. As a result of such deposit, the 2011 Certificates are deemed to have been paid and defeased in accordance with the Trust Agreement. The pledge of the funds provided for under the Trust Agreement and all other obligations of the District to the owners of the defeased 2011 Certificates shall hereafter be limited to the application of moneys in the Escrow Fund for the payment of the redemption price with respect to the 2011 Certificates, as described below. The cash and U.S. Treasury Securities deposited in the Escrow Fund have been calculated to provide sufficient moneys to pay the principal and interest with respect to the 2011 Certificates to and including July 1, 2021, to redeem the outstanding 2011 Certificates in full on July 1, 2021, at a redemption price equal to 100% of then accreted value thereof. Dated: June __, 2019 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee Exhibit D EXHIBIT D FORM OF NOTICE OF FULL/FINAL REDEMPTION West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Certificates of Participation (2011 Financing Program) Issue Maturity Interest Redemption Redemption CUSIP Date Date Rate Date Price (1) Number 12/29/2011 7/1/2026 5.000% 7/1/2021 $ 525,000 952341 BA2 12/29/2011 7/1/2032 6.000 7/1/2021 6,890,000 952341 BB0 12/29/2011 7/1/2037 5.750 7/1/2021 13,635,000 952341 BC8 12/29/2011 7/1/2042 6.250 7/1/2021 18,215,000 952341 BD6 (1) Plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. NOTICE is hereby given that the outstanding West Contra Costa Healthcare District (Contra Costa County, California) Certificates of Participation (2011 Financing Program), described above (the “2011 Certificates”), have been called for redemption on July 1, 2021 (the “Redemption Date”), at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to such date (the “Redemption Price”). The 2011 Certificates are being called for redemption on the Redemption Date pursuant to the provisions of the governing documents of the 2011 Certificates. On the Redemption Date, the Redemption Price will become due and payable upon each Bond. Owners presenting their 2011 Certificates in person for the same day payment must surrender their Bonds by 1:00 p.m. on the Redemption Date and a check will be available for pickup after 2:00 p.m. Checks not picked up by 4:30 p.m. will be mailed to the Owner by first class mail. If payment of the Redemption Price is to be made to the Owner, such Owner is not required to endorse the 2011 Certificate to collect the Redemption Price. Under the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 1995 (the “Act”) 28% of the Redemption Price will be withheld if the tax identification number is not properly certified. The Form W- 9 may be obtained from the Internal Revenue Service. Neither the District nor U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, shall be held responsible for the selection or use of the CUSIP number, nor is any representation made as to its correctness as shown in the Redemption Notice. It is included solely for convenience of the Owners. Dated: __________ __, 2021 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee 23018.05 WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 2019/183 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FORM AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN INDENTURE, BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT S AND AN ESCROW AGREEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE, SALE AND DELIVERY OF REVENUE BONDS TO REFUND THE OUTSTANDING WEST CONTRA COSTA HEALTHCARE DISTRICT CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (2011 FINANCING PROGRAM), AND APPROVING CERTAIN OTHER ACTIONS RESOLVED, by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the West Contra Costa Healthcare District (the “District”), as follows: WHEREAS, the District has heretofore caused the execution and delivery of its West Contra Costa Healthcare District Certificates of Participation (2011 Financing Program) (the “2011 COPs”), of which $39,535,000 is currently outstanding; WHEREAS, the District has determined that, pursuant to that certain Second Amended Plan for the Adjustments of Debts, dated, July 21, 2017, in connection with the District’s Chapter 9 bankruptcy filing, as a result of favorable financial market conditions and for other reasons, it is in the best interests of the District at this time to provide for the refunding , on a n advance basis, of the 2011 COPs; WHEREAS, in furtherance thereof, the District has determined to issue its West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2019 (Taxable Converting to Tax - Exempt) (the “Bonds”), pursuant to the provisions of section 53570 et seq. of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the District’s obligation to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds will be secured by a first and prior lien on the revenues derived by the District from an annual special parcel tax on each taxable parcel of real property within the District (exclusive of parcels for which exemptions have been granted, approved by approximately 84% of the voters of the District at a special election held on June 8, 2004), on a parity with the District’s outstanding West Contra Costa Healthcare District Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2018; and WHEREAS, the District has determined to authorize the officers of the District to take all necessary action to accomplish the issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED and DETERMINED, as follows: -2- Section 1. The Board hereby approves the refunding, on a n advance basis, of the 2011 COPs by the issuance of the Bonds, without limitation as to principal amount, subject to a minimum annual savings of at least $100,000 . Section 2. The form of indenture between the District and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (the “Trustee”), as presented to this meeting (the “Indenture”), is hereby approved. The Executive Director or the Treasurer, the Chief Operating Officer & CFO of Contra Costa Health Services, or the designee thereof (each, an “Authorized Officer”), is hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the District, to execute and deliver the Indenture in substantially the form p resented to this meeting, with such changes therein as the officer executing the same may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Indenture. The date, maturity date, interest rate, interest payment dates, denominations, forms, registration privileges, place or places of payment, terms of redemption and other terms of the Bonds shall be as provided in the Indenture, as finally executed. Section 3. The form of escrow agreement between the District and U.S. Ban k National Association, as escrow bank (the “Escrow Bank”), with respect to the refunding of the 2011 COPs (the “Escrow Agreement”), as presented to this meeting, is hereby approved. Any Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the District, to execute and deliver the Escrow Agreement in substantially the form presented to this meeting, with such changes therein as the officer executing the same may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Escrow Agreement . Section 4. The form of Bond Purchase Agreement, each between the District and Pacific Western Bank and Western Alliance Business Trust, a wholly owned affiliate of Western Alliance Bank, an Arizona corporation , as purchasers, as presented to this meeting (the “Bond Purchase Agreements”), is hereby approved. Any Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed for and in the name of the District, to execute and deliver separate Bond Purchase Agreements in substan tially the form presented to this meeting, with such changes therein as the officer executing the same may approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Bond Purchase Agreements. Section 5. The Authorized Officers are hereby authorized and directed, for and in the name of the District, to execute and deliver any other documents as may be deemed necessary or appropriate to implement the refinancing or to issue the Bonds, including retaining a bidding agent for the purchase of escrow securities, if required, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of such documents. Section 6. The Bonds shall be executed by the manual or facsimile signature of any Authorized Officer and attested by t he manual or facsimile signature of the Secretary, or the designee thereof, in the form set forth in and otherwise in accordance with said indenture. Section 7. The Authorized Officers are hereby authorized and directed, for and on behalf of the District, to approve any changes to the foregoing documents, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery thereof. -3- Section 8. The Bonds, when so executed, shall be delivered to the Trustee for authentication by the Trustee. The Trustee is hereby requested and directed to authenticate the Bonds by executing the Trustee’s Certificate of Authentication appearing thereon, and to deliver the Bonds, when duly executed and authenticated, to the purchaser thereof in accordance with written instructions of the District. Said instructions shall provide for the delivery of the Bonds to the purchaser thereof upon payment of the purchase price thereof. Section 9. The Secretary or the designee thereof is hereby authorized and directed to attest the signature of the Authorized Officers, as may be required in connection with the execution and delivery of the Indenture, the Bond Purchase Agreements, the Escrow Agreement and the Bonds in accordance with this Resolution. Section 10. The Authorized Officers and other authorized officers of the District are each hereby authorized and directed to do the following with respect to the issuance of the Bonds: a. Take any and all actions and execute, acknowledge, deliver and file any and all agreements, instruments or other documents of any kind required of the District; and b. Act as an agent to the District for the purposes of issuing the Bonds and any additional negotiations, authorizations, approval, executions, consents, notices, deliveries or other acts required to issue such Bonds. Section 11. All actions taken by the Authorized Officers and other officers or directors of the District which have been undertaken to date or which will be undertaken with respect to the planning, negotiation, authorization, approvals and implementation of the financing plan are hereby ratified, confirmed and approved in all respects. Section 12. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. -4- * * * * * * * * * I, the undersigned Secretary of the West Contra Costa Healthcare District , hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board at a meeting thereof on the 11th day of June, 2019, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: Jami Napier, Secretary RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE clarification of Board action of October 23, 2018 (Item C.50), which authorized the Purchasing Agent to execute a purchase order with Steris Corporation, in the amount of $266,522 for the purchase of two V-Pro Max Vaporized Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP) Sterilizers for the Central Sterilization Unit at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC), to reflect the correct payment amount of $267,627. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I budget. BACKGROUND: On October 23, 2018 the Board of Supervisors approved the Purchase Order with Steris Corporation in the amount of $266,522 for the purchase of two V-Pro Max VHP Sterilizers required to reliably sterilize surgical equipment used during procedures. The purpose of this Board Order is to correct an administrative error in the total payment limit, which should be $267,627, instead of $266,522. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the correction to the Purchase Order is not approved, CCRMC will be unable to purchase the V-Pro Max VHP Sterilizers to sterilize surgical equipment. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jaspreet Benepal, 925-370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Margaret Harris C.163 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Clarification of October 23, 2018 Board Order item #C.50 with Steris Corporation RECOMMENDATION(S): AUTHORIZE the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to sign the Certification Statement for the California Children’s Services Program as required by the State of California. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The State of California requires an annual statement certifying that the County’s California Children’s Services Program (CCS) will comply with all applicable provisions, Federal and State regulations and laws, including the Health and Safety Code and any applicable rules or regulations promulgated by the California Department of Health Care Services. The statement must be signed by the CCS program administrator, health officer, and chair of the local governing board. The certification is attached for reference, but original documents are to be signed. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 925-313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Ashley Kokotaylo, Marcy Wilhelm C.164 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Annual California Children’s Services Program Certification CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the certification is not signed and returned to the State, the County will not be following program requirements. ATTACHMENTS Certification Letter FILE COPY FILE COPY RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the Storm Water Treatment – Escobar Street Parking Lot Project (Project), Martinez area. [County Project No. WH140B, DCD-CP#19-14] (District V). DETERMINE the Project is a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Class 1(b) Categorical Exemption, pursuant to Article 19, Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, and DIRECT the Director of Department of Conservation and Development to file a Notice of Exemption with the County Clerk, and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to arrange for payment of a $25 fee to the Department of Conservation and Development for processing, and a $50 fee to the County Clerk for filing the Notice of Exemption. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Alex Nattkemper (925) 313-2364 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Ave Brown - Environmental Division Manager, Alex Nattkemper-Environmental Services C.165 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE the Storm Water Treatment – Escobar Street Parking Lot Project and take related actions under CEQA. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated Project cost: $50,000. 100% General Funds. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this project is to provide storm water treatment in support of the new County Administration building in Downtown Martinez. Storm water treatment at the new building site is not feasible due to the slope of the new roadway that is part of that project’s design. Therefore, an existing stand-alone County parking lot on Escobar Street (Assessor’s Parcel Number 373-050-002) was selected as an alternate location to treat storm water. The project consists of installing a new bio-retention feature, landscaping, irrigation, and associated site work. On November 13, 2018, the Board of Supervisors awarded a job order contract (JOC) for repair, remodeling, and other repetitive work to be performed pursuant to the Construction Task Catalog to Mark Scott Construction, Inc., Aztec Consultants, and Staples Construction Company, Inc., each in the amount of $2,500,000. This project is expected to be performed by one of the three JOC contractors. A task order catalogue has been prepared for the JOC contractor to complete this Project. In the event that the Project is not performed by the JOC contractor, the Public Works Department will return to the Board for approval of plans and specifications and authorization to advertise and solicit bids. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Delay in approving the project may result in a delay of design, construction, and may jeopardize funding. ATTACHMENTS CEQA Document RECOMMENDATION(S): DECLARE as surplus and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to dispose of fully depreciated vehicles and equipment no longer needed for public use, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Section 1108-2.212 of the County Ordinance Code authorizes the Purchasing Agent to dispose of any personal property belonging to Contra Costa County and found by the Board of Supervisors not to be required for public use. The property for disposal is either obsolete, worn out, beyond economical repair, or damaged beyond repair. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Public Works would not be able to dispose of surplus vehicles and equipment. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Nida Rivera, (925) 313-2124 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C.166 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Disposal of Surplus Property ATTACHMENTS Surplus Vehicles & Equipment Additional Surplus Vehicles ATTACHMENT TO BOARD ORDER JUNE 11, 2019 Department Description/Unit/Make/Model Serial No. Condition A. Obsolete B. Worn Out C. Beyond economical repair D. Damaged beyond repair PUBLIC WORKS 1999 FREIGHTLIN FL70 UTILITY TRUCK #6303 (165839 MILES) 1FV6HLBA1XHA02076 B. WORN OUT PUBLIC WORKS 2004 FORD TAURUS SEDAN #0738 (56124 MILES) 1FAFP52U54A182870 B. WORN OUT HEALTH SERVICES 2008 CHEVY 1500 VAN #4669 (160316 MILES) 1GNFG154181233955 B. WORN OUT PUBLIC WORKS 2006 FORD F-250 TRUCK #5569 (116534 MILES) 1FTNF20586EA69980 D. DAMAGED BEYOND REPAIR SHERIFF 1997 FORD CROWN VICTORIA #2734 1FTNF20586EA69980 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2013 FORD ESCAPE #3724 (121074 MILES) 1FMCU0G90DUB16508 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2010 FORD CROWN VICTORIA #2002 (101174 MILES) 2FABP7BV8AX115413 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2014 FORD TAURUS SEDAN #1094 (88904 MILES) 1FAHP2D81EG135163 C. BEYOND ECONOMICAL REPAIR SHERIFF 2009 FORD RANGER TRUCK #5071 (111151 MILES) 1FTLR1EE7APA00843 B. WORN OUT PUBLIC WORKS 1998 CIMLINE PCR-25 EQUIPMENT #9088 98-11306 C. BEYOND ECONOMICAL REPAIR SHERIFF 2010 TOYOTA CAMRY HYBRID #1223 (100383 MILES) 4T1BB3EK9AU123316 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2010 TOYOTA CAMRY HYBRID #1211 (102497 MILES) 4T1BB3EKXAU122160 B. WORN OUT DISTRICT ATTORNEY 2011 TOYOTA CAMRY HYBRID #1236 (126106 MILES) 4T1BB3EK6BU140334 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2013 FORD INTERCEPTOR #2334 (113934 MILES) 1FAHP2MT9DG201963 B. WORN OUT PUBLIC WORKS 2007 FORD ESCAPE HYBRID #3683 (90729 MILES) 1FMYU59H67KC05264 C. BEYOND ECONOMICAL REPAIR PUBLIC WORKS 2014 FORD F-450 DUMP TRUCK #5659 (75288 MILES) 1FD0W4GY1EEB02771 C. BEYOND ECONOMICAL REPAIR PUBLIC WORKS 1999 FORD F-250 TRUCK #5544 (91895 MILES) 1FTPF27L0XKB11672 B. WORN OUT ANIMAL SERVICES 2008 FORD F-250 ANIMAL TRUCK #5476 (152000 MILES) 1FDSX20R58EE41809 B. WORN OUT PUBLIC WORKS 1990 FORD F-700 DUMP TRUCK #6414 (49660 MILES) 1FDWK74PXLVA11823 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2010 FORD CROWN VICTORIA #1957 (84333 MILES) 2FAFP7BV4AX126652 B. WORN OUT HEALTH SERVICES 2010 TOYOTA CAMRY HYBRID #1220 (103088 MILES) 4T1BB3EK7AU123217 B. WORN OUT EHSD 2002 FORD E-350 PASSENGER VAN #4616 (34,236 MILES) 1FBNE31L62HA81676 B. WORN OUT ATTACHMENT TO BOARD ORDER JUNE 11, 2019 Department Description/Unit/Make/Model Serial No. Condition A. Obsolete B. Worn Out C. Beyond economical repair D. Damaged beyond repair SHERIFF 2000 CHEVY S-10 TRUCK #5013 (33119 MILES) 1GCCS19W7YK238433 C. BEYOND ECONOMICAL REPAIR AGRICULTURE 2004 FORD RANGER TRUCK #5047 (118425 MILES 1FTYR10E14PA91173 B. WORN OUT PROBATION 2009 TOYOTA CAMRY HYBRID #1207 (104478 MILES) 4T1BB46K1FTYR10E1 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2010 FORD CROWN VICTORIA #2002 (101174 MILES) 2FABP7BV8AX115413 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2005 FORD TAURUS SEDAN #0752 (83391 MILES) 1FAFP53U05A265963 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2010 FORD CROWN VICTORIA #2005 (102379 MILES) 2FABP7BVXAX115414 B. WORN OUT EHS/COMM SERVICES 2002 FORD E-350 PASSENGER VAN #4616 (34234 MILES) 1FBNE31L62HA81676 C. BEYOND ECONOMICAL REPAIR EHS/COMM SERVICES 1993 FORD E-350 PASSENGER VAN #4422 (85136 MILES) 1FBHE31H8PHB81584 B. WORN OUT EHS/COMM SERVICES 2000 CHEVY MALIBU SEDAN #0428 (67917 MILES) 1G1ND52J9Y6251291 B. WORN OUT SHERIFF 2009 FORD RANGER TRUCK #5071 (111151 MILES) 1FTLR1EE7APA00843 B. WORN OUT RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. FIND that the FY 2019/20 Action Plan and the Analysis of Impediments/Assessment to Fair Housing Choice are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA guidelines; and 2. APPROVE the Family and Human Services Committee recommendations for the allocation of $759,375 in FY 2019/20 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds in the Public Service (PS) category (Attachment A-1) and $365,063 in Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds (Attachment A-2); and 3. APPROVE staff recommendations for the allocation of $400,152 in FY 2019/20 CDBG funds in the Economic Development (ED) category (Attachment B-1); and the allocation of $451,993 in FY 2019/20 CDBG funds in the Infrastructure/Public Facilities (IPF) category (Attachment B-2); and 4. APPROVE the Affordable Housing Finance Committee recommendations for the allocation of $3,654,865 in CDBG funds in the Housing category, $2,854,789 in HOME Investment Partnership Act (HOME) funds (Attachment C); and APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gabriel Lemus, 925-674-7882 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: CAO-H&HS Deputy, CAO-Muni Svcs Deputy C.167 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Allocation of FY 2019/20 CDBG, HOME and ESG Funds and Approval of 2019/20 Action Plan and Analysis of Impediments/Assessment to Fair Housing Choice RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) 5. ADOPT and APPROVE the FY 2019/20 Action Plan (Attachment D); and 7. ADOPT and APPROVE the Analysis of Impediments/Assessment to Fair Housing Choice (Attachment E); and 9. DIRECT the Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) Director to file a Notice of Exemption for the FY 2019/20 Action Plan and the Analysis of Impediments/Assessment to Fair Housing Choice with the County Clerk; and 10. AUTHORIZE the DCD Director, or designee, to execute the program certifications and applications (SF-424's) for transmittal to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and 11. AUTHORIZE the DCD Director, or designee, to execute the CDBG and ESG program agreements as approved in the FY 2019/20 Action Plan by the Board of Supervisors. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no General Fund impact. All funds are provided to Contra Costa County (County) on a formula basis through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program - 14.218 HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME) Program - 14.239 Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Program - 14.231 Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) Program - 14.241 BACKGROUND: The CDBG Program will be entering its forty-fifth year. The primary objective of the CDBG program is the development of viable urban communities through the provision of decent housing, a suitable living environment, and economic opportunity. CDBG funds are allocated annually to eligible entitlement jurisdictions by HUD on a formula basis. The County’s DCD administers CDBG funds on behalf of the "Urban County". The Urban County includes the unincorporated County and all cities except Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. Those cities administer independent CDBG programs. The purpose of the HOME Program is to increase and maintain the supply of affordable housing for lower income households. Funds are allocated to eligible participating jurisdictions and HOME consortia on a formula basis by HUD. The Contra Costa HOME Consortium (Consortium) consists of the Urban County and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. As the Consortium representative, the County is responsible for administration and management of the HOME program for the Consortium. The County, as an entitlement jurisdiction, receives ESG funds annually from HUD on a formula basis for use in funding renovations of buildings for use as emergency shelters for the homeless; provision of essential services for the homeless; emergency shelter operations and related services; and homelessness prevention and rapid re-housing activities. The County administers ESG funds on behalf of the Urban County. The County also receives HOPWA funds, as a sub-grantee of the City of Oakland, to provide localities with resources and incentives to devise long term strategies for meeting the housing needs of persons with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or related diseases and their families. HOPWA funds may be used for a wide range of housing, social services, program planning, and development costs. These include, but are not limited to, the acquisition, rehabilitation, or new construction of housing units; costs for facility operations; rental assistance; and short-term payments to prevent homelessness. The County administers HOPWA funds on behalf of the Consortium. Staff is recommending $844,665 in FY 2019/20 HOPWA funds to Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond and Eden Housing, Inc. (CHDC/Eden) and $210,000 in FY 2019/20 HOPWA funds to Resources for Community Development (RCD). The HOPWA funds will be specifically for CHDC's/Eden's Legacy Court project and for RCD's 1313 Galindo project. As proposed, CHDC/Eden is being recommended $200,000 for construction/construction close of their respective project, and $10,000 will be for specific project delivery costs incurred by the County. RCD is being recommended $834,665 for construction/construction close of their respective project, and $10,000 will be for specific project delivery costs incurred by the County. These recommendations are being considered by the Board on the same date as a separate item. FY 2019/20 Action Plan The Action Plan (Attachment D) describes the projects and programs the County will undertake during the program year to address priority needs identified in the Contra Costa County FY 2015-2020 Consolidated Plan, and identifies the use of grant funds and program income received during the program year by activity, and proposed accomplishments. In order to begin the program year on time, the County's FY2019/20 must be approved by the Board of Supervisors and submitted to HUD by June 11, 2019. On November 4, 2014, the Board of Supervisors (Board) amended its funding guidelines, originally adopted in 1993 and revised in 2006, for use of CDBG funds as follows: Housing - 45 percent; Public Services (PS) - 17 percent; Economic Development (ED) - 10 percent; Infrastructure/Public Facilities (IPF) - 8 percent; and Program Administration - 20 percent. Funding recommendations are made by the following Committees: Family and Human Services Committee – CDBG Public Service (PS) and ESG categories Finance Committee – CDBG Economic Development (ED) and Infrastructure/Public Facilities (IPF) categories Affordable Housing Finance Committee – HOME and CDBG-Housing category Family and Human Services (FHS) Committee: The FHS Committee met on May 13, 2019, to consider staff recommendations for FY 2019/20 PS and ESG projects. The meeting was noticed and project applicants were encouraged to attend and provide input into the allocation process. Approximately 4 persons representing various agencies attended the meeting. After discussion, the FHS Committee approved staff recommendations as shown in Attachment A-1 and A-2. Finance Committee: The recommendations for the allocation of CDBG funds under the ED category and IPF category are typically made and forwarded to the Board by the Finance Committee. Unfortunately, the Finance Committee was unable to meet in the months of April or May for CDBG staff to present recommendations. However, staff is recommending that all applications received in the ED and IPF categories get awarded funding at their requested amounts, as shown in Attachment B-1 and B-2. Affordable Housing Finance Committee (AHFC): The AHFC is a Board-appointed advisory committee that develops funding recommendations for the Board concerning the allocation of federal funds for affordable housing development. The AHFC met on April 23, 2019, to consider staff funding funds for affordable housing development. The AHFC met on April 23, 2019, to consider staff funding recommendations for CDBG-housing and HOME projects. Members of the public, including project sponsors, were invited to attend and provide input into the allocation process. Following discussion and comment on each project, the AHFC developed recommendations for the allocation of CDBG and HOME funds for affordable housing programs and projects (Attachment C). Analysis of Impediments/Assessment to Fair Housing Choice Recipients of funds from HUD have a duty to affirmatively further fair housing, by taking proactive steps to overcome housing discrimination and segregation. To help meet this requirement, Contra Costa County worked with the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek, as well as with the three Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) in Contra Costa County, to conduct an Analysis of Impediments/Assessment to Fair Housing Choice (AI). The preparation and completion of an AI is a recurring obligation of the County, set forth by HUD, and must be completed every five years. The AI is a report that identifies fair housing issues in Contra Costa and the region, discusses contributing factors to issues, and outlines goals and strategies to address issues. The fair housing analysis in the AI focuses on patterns of integration and segregation, racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity, and disproportionate housing needs. Other components of the AI examine publicly supported housing, disability and access, fair housing enforcement, and demographics. The AI process involved an analysis of data provided by HUD, local data from the jurisdictions and PHAs, and feedback gathered from the community through surveys and community meetings. The recommendations in the AI are to inform future policies in Contra Costa County that will promote fair housing choice and inclusive communities. The completed Draft AI (Attachment E) was noticed in the newspaper and the document was posted online for public review and comment 30 days prior to public hearing. No written public comments were received as of the preparation of this report. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Delay in approving the recommendations by staff and the Committees, the Action Plan, and/or the AI, may result in the County not submitting its application on time and jeopardize the County receiving its FY 2019/20 CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Most of the projects and programs funded with CDBG, HOME, and ESG funds address at least one of the five community outcomes established in the Children's Report Card. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A-1 - FHS PS Recommendations Attachment A-2 - FHS ESG Recommendations Attachment B-1 - Staff ED Recommendations Attachment B-2 - Staff IPF Recommendations Attachment C - AHFC Recommendations Attachment D-Draft Action Plan Attachment E - DRAFT AI Community Development Block Grant Public Services Category FY 2019/20 ATTACHMENT A-1 Amount Requested Amount Received in FY 2018/19 County Staff Recommendation for FY 2019/20 Antioch Concord Pittsburg WC 19-01-PS A Place of Learning (APOL)After School Tutoring and Mentoring Program $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $38,400.00 19-02-PS Bay Area Legal Aid (BayLegal)Tenant/Landlord Counseling & Legal Services $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $15,000.00 $11,450.00 $106,450.00 $158,577.00 19-03-PS CCC-Health Servces Dept. - H3 Contra Costa Adult Continuum of Services $76,300.00 $54,000.00 $76,300.00 $10,000.00 $11,450.00 $6,000.00 $103,750.00 $2,975,451.00 19-04-PS Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond Multicultural/Senior Family Center $55,000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 $93,964.00 19-05-PS Community Housing Development Corporation Contra Costa County Home Equity Preservation Alliance (HEPA)$25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $155,536.00 19-06-+PS Community Violence Solutions (CVS)CIC Child Sexual Assault Intervention $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $25,000.00 $307,500.00 19-07-PS Contra Costa County Service Integration Program-SparkPoint Contra Costa Community Career Center $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $228,050.00 19-08-PS Contra Costa Crisis Center Crisis / 211 Contra Costa $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $10,000.00 $11,450.00 $9,500.00 $48,950.00 $1,261,524 Total Budget CD-1 General Public Services CCC Project No.Applicant Project Name Total CDBG Amount Requested (Other CDBG Jurisdictions)Contra Costa County Community Development Block Grant Public Services Category FY 2019/20 ATTACHMENT A-1 Amount Requested Amount Received in FY 2018/19 County Staff Recommendation for FY 2019/20 Antioch Concord Pittsburg WC Total Budget CD-1 General Public Services CCC Project No.Applicant Project Name Total CDBG Amount Requested (Other CDBG Jurisdictions)Contra Costa County 19-09-PS Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance Family Justice Center $32,000.00 $32,000.00 $32,000.00 $32,000.00 $2,643,402.00 19-10-PS Contra Costa Senior Legal Services Legal Services for Seniors $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $7,000.00 $39,000.00 $529,055.00 19-11-PS Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA)Children At Risk $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $5,000.00 $11,450.00 $10,000.00 $44,450.00 $835,179.00 19-12-PS ECHO Housing Fair Housing Services $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $25,000.00 $11,450.00 $6,000.00 $82,450.00 $336,615.00 19-13-PS East Bay Center for the Performing Arts Deep Roots, Wide World Program $11,500.00 $11,500.00 $11,500.00 $11,500.00 $55,927.00 19-14-PS Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano Collaborative Food Distribution $46,500.00 $46,500.00 $46,500.00 $11,450.00 $57,950.00 $5,810,551.00 19-15-PS Girls Inc.Summer/Afterschool and Education Enrichment Programming $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $245,000.00 19-16-PS James Morehouse Project / YMCA of the East Bay (fiscal sponsor)James Morehouse Project at El Cerrito High School $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $323,000.00 Community Development Block Grant Public Services Category FY 2019/20 ATTACHMENT A-1 Amount Requested Amount Received in FY 2018/19 County Staff Recommendation for FY 2019/20 Antioch Concord Pittsburg WC Total Budget CD-1 General Public Services CCC Project No.Applicant Project Name Total CDBG Amount Requested (Other CDBG Jurisdictions)Contra Costa County 19-17-PS Lamorinda Spirit - City of Lafayette Lamorinda Spirit Van Senior Transportation Program $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $180,317.00 19-18-PS Lions Center for the Visually Impaired Independent Living Skills for Blind and Visually Impaired Adults $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $7,500.00 $22,500.00 $308,870.00 19-19-PS Loaves and Fishes of Contra Costa Nourishing Lives in Martinez, Antioch and Pittsburg $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $30,000.00 $1,136,604.00 19-20-PS Meals on Wheels Diablo Region Care Management $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $7,000.00 $32,000.00 $345,972.00 19-21-PS Meals on Wheels Diablo Region Senior Nutrition - CC Cafes $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $11,450.00 $26,450.00 $341,576.00 19-22-PS Monument Crisis Center Critical Safety Net Resources for Families and Individuals $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $11,450.00 $13,500.00 $39,950.00 $2,673,900.00 19-23-PS Mount Diablo Unified School District CARES After School Enrichment Program $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $4,514,586.00 19-24-PS New Horizons Career Development Center Education, Job Training, Life Skills, and Job Placement Services $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $189,460.00 Community Development Block Grant Public Services Category FY 2019/20 ATTACHMENT A-1 Amount Requested Amount Received in FY 2018/19 County Staff Recommendation for FY 2019/20 Antioch Concord Pittsburg WC Total Budget CD-1 General Public Services CCC Project No.Applicant Project Name Total CDBG Amount Requested (Other CDBG Jurisdictions)Contra Costa County 19-25-PS Ombudsman Services of Contra Costa Ombudsman Services of Contra Costa $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $11,450.00 $8,500.00 $39,950.00 $962,005.00 19-26-PS Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District Senior Service Network $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $55,917.00 19-27-PS RYSE, Inc.RYSE Career Pathway Program $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $335,809.00 19-28-PS Rainbow Community Center of Contra Costa Kind Hearts Community Support Program $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $7,000.00 $17,000.00 $98,040.00 19-29-PS Richmond Public Library Words on Wheels $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $16,755.80 19-30-PS SHELTER, Inc.Homeless Prevention & Rapid Rehousing Program $25,075.00 $25,075.00 $25,075.00 $25,000.00 $50,075.00 $760,723.00 19-31-PS St. Vincent de Paul of Contra Costa County RotaCare Pittsburg Free Medical Clinic at St. Vincent de Paul $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $15,479.00 $27,479.00 $221,529.00 19-32-PS Village Community Resource Center Village Community Resource Center Program Support $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $415,050.00 Community Development Block Grant Public Services Category FY 2019/20 ATTACHMENT A-1 Amount Requested Amount Received in FY 2018/19 County Staff Recommendation for FY 2019/20 Antioch Concord Pittsburg WC Total Budget CD-1 General Public Services CCC Project No.Applicant Project Name Total CDBG Amount Requested (Other CDBG Jurisdictions)Contra Costa County 109-33-PS West County Adult Day Care West County Adult Day Shelter/Alzheimer $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $199,100.00TOTAL$759,375.00 $737,075.00 $759,375.00 Emergency Solutions Grant FY 2019/20 ATTACHMENT A-2 Project Name Amount Requested Amount Received in FY 2018/19 County Staff Rec. FY 2019/20 19-01-ESG CC Health Services H3 Adult Interim Housing Program Emergency shelter beds and wraparound services for 150 homeless. $100,393 $122,693 $100,000 $100,000 $2,975,454 19-02-ESG CC Health Services H3 Calli House Youth Shelter Emergency shelter beds and support services for 25 homeless youth.$24,328 $24,328 $30,000 $30,000 $798,795 19-03-ESG CC Health Services H3 CORE-Coordinated Outreach, Referral, and Engagement Program Provide day and evening homeless street outreach services to at least 450 Urban County individuals living outside throughout the County to engage, stabilize, deliver health and basic need services, and aid in obtaining interim and permanent housing. $22,300 N/A $25,795 $25,795 $639,888 19-04-ESG SHELTER, Inc.Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Program Homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing services to 60 Extremely Low Income households in the Urban County $118,723 $121,416 $128,268 $128,268 $763,416 19-05-ESG STAND! For Families Free of Violence Rollie Mullen Emergency Shelter Emergency shelter and support services for 40 women and their children.$45,328 $45,328 $50,000 $50,000 $504,203 19-06-ESG Trinity Center Trinity Center Hygiene/food services and day-use facility for 100 homeless clients.$26,830 $26,830 $31,000 $31,000 $955,280 $337,902 $340,595 $365,063 $365,063 $6,637,036 Totals CCC Project No.OutcomeApplicant Total Budget Total ESG Contra Costa County Community Development Block Grant Economic Development CategoryFY 2019/20ATTACHMENT B-1Project NameAmount RequestedAmount Received FY 2018/19County Staff Rec. for FY 2019/20Antioch Concord Pittsburg WC19-01-EDContra Costa ChildCare CouncilRoad to SuccessMicroenterprise growth and assistance for 90 FCCH child care providers.$85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $145,000 $245,25059%19-02-ED Multicultural InstituteLifeskills/Day LaborProgramProvide job-matching, individualized assistance with health, legal, and educational needs to 300 poverty level and extremely-low income day laborers.$26,000 $26,000 $26,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,000 $86,50030%19-03-ED Opportunity Junction Job Training andPlacement ProgramProvide 10 participants with job training, support services and job placement.$100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $60,000 $0 $30,000 $0 $190,000 $947,00320%19-04-ED Opportunity Junction Bay Point CareerDevelopment ServicesProvide intensive, individualized vocational services including assessment and development of employment plans, case management and service referrals to 30 low-income persons.$20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $10,000 $0 $30,000 $172,49117%19-05-EDRenaissance Entrepreneurship CenterRenaissance Richmond Intensive small business/ microenterprise training and technical assistance to 50 unduplicated lower-income individuals who own or wish to start a small business/ microenterprise $42,000 $42,000 $42,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,000 $295,98414%19-06-EDWest Contra Costa Business Dev. Center, Inc.Emerging Entrepreneurs ProgramTo provide technical assistance and support to 50 existing businesses or persons wishing to open a business as a way to create/retain jobs.$77,152 $77,152 $77,152 $0 $0 $0 $0 $77,152 $244,80032%19-07-EDWorkforce Development Board of Contra Costa CountySmall Business Development Center (SBDC)Small business training for 50 clients.$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $15,000 $30,000 $15,000 $15,000 $125,000 $325,00038%$400,152 $400,152 $400,152 $90,000 $45,000 $70,000 $30,000 $635,152 $1,992,02832%Economic Development Projects% Budget (CDBG)Total BudgetTotal CDBG RequestedContra Costa CountyAmount Requested(Other CDBG Jurisdictions)TotalCCC Application No.OutcomeApplicant Community Development Block GrantInfrastructure Public Facilities CategoryFY 2019/20Attachment B-219-01-IPFCity of OakleyOakley Senior Center Building Renovation-Phase 3Roof Replacement and HVAC Replacement for the Oakley Senior Center$80,000.00 $80,000.00 $106,667.0075.00%19-02-IPFCity of Richmond, Community ServicesRichmond Recreation Center ImprovementRemove and replace flooring and painting of recreation center social hall$71,200.00 $71,200.00 $94,933.0075.00%19-03-IPFContra Costa County Public Works Montalvin Park Sport CourtsImprove sports courts located on upper level of Montalvin Park$95,000.00 $95,000.00 $289,499.0032.82%19-04-IPFGreater Richmond Interfaith Program Homeless Shelter Repairs and Solar PanelsRehabilitation of GRIP's Richmond homeless shelter.$126,418.00 $126,418.00 $140,465.0090.00%19-05-IPFTown of MoragaADA Restroom, Pathway & Handrail UpgradesPerform ADA Upgrades at Hacienda de Las Flores Park in Moraga.$79,375.00 $79,375.00 $163,204.0048.64%Total $451,993.00 $451,993.00 $794,768.00IPF: Infrastructure/Public FacilitiesOutcomeCCCApplicationNo. Applicant Project Name/LocationAmountRequestedFY 2019/20 Staff Recommendation Total Budget% Budget(CDBG) Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships ActFY 2019/20 Affordable Housing AllocationsAttachment CProject ID# Sponsor (b) Project Name/Location Description/PurposePrevious AllocationCDBG HOME HOPWA Total Cost CDBG HOME Total County funds recommended19‐01‐HSGSatellite Affordable Housing Associates (CHDO)1835 Alcatraz AvenueBerkeley, CA 94703Veteran's Square901 Los Medanos StreetPittsburg, CATo provide 30 units of multifamily rental housing affordable to and occupied by homeless veterans and veterans with a disability in Pittsburg. $ 1,195,000 $ ‐ $ 1,005,400 $ ‐ $ 17,342,888 $ ‐ $ 1,005,400 $ 1,005,400 Veteran's Square County Program Delivery Cost $ 50,000 Resources for Community Development (CHDO)2220 Oxford StBerkeley, CA 94596St. Paul's Commons1860 Trinity AvenueWalnut Creek, CATo provide 45 units of multifamily rental housing affordable to and occupied by low‐income households in Walnut Creek.3,874,681$ $ ‐ $ 450,000 $ ‐ $ 23,037,174 19‐02‐HSGResources for Community Development (CHDO)2220 Oxford StBerkeley, CA 945961313 Galindo1313‐1321 Galindo StreetConcord, CATo provide 62 units of multifamily rental housing affordable to and occupied by low‐income households in Concord. $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 2,300,000 $ 200,000 $ 40,719,163 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 200,000 19‐03‐HSGCommunity Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond (CHDO)1535‐A Fred Jackson WayRichmond, CA 94801Legacy CourtFred Jackson WayNorth Richmond, CATo provide 43 units of multifamily rental housing affordable to and occupied by low‐income households in Richmond. $ ‐ $ 856,488 $ 608,847 $ 834,665 $ 31,525,580 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 834,665 19‐04‐HSGHabitat for Humanity East Bay/Silicon Valley2619 BroadwayOakland, CA 94612Las Juntas1250 Las Juntas WayWalnut Creek, CANew construction of 42 condominium units of for‐sale housing in Walnut Creek. 32 units will be sold to households with 80% AMI and 10 units will be sold to households with 120% AMI. $ ‐ $0 $1,605,324 0 $22,043,308 0 1,605,000$ $ 1,605,000 Las Juntas County Program Delivery Cost50,000$ Staff Recommendation (a)Objective AH‐1 ‐ New Construction of Affordable Rental Housing.Objective AH ‐2 ‐ Homeownership OpportunitiesFunds Requested Application Withdrawn. Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnerships ActFY 2019/20 Affordable Housing AllocationsAttachment CProject ID# Sponsor (b) Project Name/Location Description/PurposePrevious AllocationCDBG HOME HOPWA Total Cost CDBG HOME Total County funds recommended Staff Recommendation (a)Funds RequestedHabitat for Humanity East Bay/Silicon Valley2619 BroadwayOakland, CA 94612Pacifica Landing589 Pacifica AvenueBay Point, CANew construction of 3 townhome units of for‐sale housing for low‐income first time homebuyers.Total budget includes $1,000,000 in Neighborhood Stabilization Act $1,000,000 ‐ NSP$300,000 $1,918,42619‐05‐HSGCCC DCD30 Muir RoadMartinez, CA 94553Habitat for Humanity East Bay/Silicon Valley2619 BroadwayOakland, CA 94612Neighborhood Preservation Program Urban CountyProvision of 17 low interest loans and grants for rehab of housing owned and occupied by very‐low and low‐income HHs. Total budget includes $250,000 in anticipated repaid loans to the program. $ ‐ $395,000 $0 $0 $645,000 $395,000 $ ‐ $ 395,000 19‐06‐HSGGreater Richmond Interfaith Program165 22nd StreetRichmond, CA 94801Safety Improvements at Veteran's housing170 21st StreetRichmond, CA Replace and move recalled electrical boxes in each residential unit and replace faulty fencing, gates and railings. $ ‐ $ 27,000 00 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 0 $ 30,000 See Public Service table Fair Housing (c)Fair housing counseling and legal services$40,000APPLICATION TOTAL FY 2019/20$1,318,488 $6,269,571 $1,034,665 $137,261,539 $425,000 $ 2,710,400 $ 4,070,065 FUNDS AVAILABLE FY 2019/20 FUNDING CYCLEFY 2019/20 Grant Allocation for projects ‐ ESTIMATED$650,000 $2,925,000 $3,171,988FY 2018/19 Housing Development Assistance Fund year‐end balance ‐ ESTIMATED $451,114 $729,865 $0FY 2019/20 Program Administration (CDBG Administration included in IPF Table)($45,500)$0($317,199)Net funds available for projects$1,055,614 $3,654,865 $2,854,789FY 19/20 HDAF Balance (e)$3,229,865 $144,389(a) HUD allowable program delivery costs included in each project's allocation amount, including project‐specific legal and compliance costs.$475,798.20Objective CD‐4 ‐ Fair HousingObjective AH‐4 ‐ New Supportive Housing ‐ Special Needs(c) Staff recommendation for fair housing service providers goes to the Family and Human Services Committee(b) Per federal regulations, 15 percent of each year's allocation of HOME funds must be used for projects sponsored, owned, or developed by Community Housing Development Corporations (CHDO). Current year CHDO minimum:Objective AH‐3 ‐ Maintain and preserve affordable housing. Application Withdrawn. Annual Action Plan 2019 1 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) DRAFT DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 2 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Executive Summary AP-05 Executive Summary - 91.200(c), 91.220(b) 1. Introduction The Contra Costa County FY 2019/20 Action Plan describes funding allocations of specific projects and programs to address housing, economic development, infrastructure/public facility improvements, and public service needs utilizing Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships Act (HOME), Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) funds. These funds are allocated annually to entitlement communities through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to carry out a wide range of community development activities that benefit lower income persons and households. In order to receive annual allocations, jurisdictions must submit a five-year Consolidated Plan and an annual Action Plan. The FY 2015-2020 Contra Costa Consortium Consolidated Plan (Consolidated Plan) identifies priority needs, strategies to meet the priority needs, and goals to be addressed during the five-year period for housing, economic development, infrastructure/public facility, and public services. The annual Action Plan must demonstrate the linkage between the use of funds and the specific objectives developed to address needs identified in the five-year Consolidated Plan. Contra Costa County's CDBG Program, for the Public Services, Economic Development, and Infrastructure/Public Facilities categories, and the ESG Program, operate on a two-year funding cycle for the first two years of the five-year Consolidated Plan period, and on a three-year funding cycle for the last three years of the five-year Consolidated Plan period. Fiscal year 2019/20 is the third year of the three-year funding cycle, so the County accepted and considered renewal applications from current subrecipients in the above-mentioned categories. However, a Notice of Funding Availability/Request for Proposals (NOFA/RFP) for CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds was published in County-wide newspapers on September 16, 2018, and sent to over 600 jurisdictions, public agencies, affordable housing developers, community based organizations and other interested groups active in the Urban County and Consortium area. The NOFA/RFP was primarily for Housing activities and Infrastructure/Public Facilities activities. On April 12, 2019, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) announced the FY 2019/20 CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA allocations to all entitlement jurisdictions. Please see the table below for the County's FY 2019/20 CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA allocations. CDBG $4,588,037 HOME $3,171,988 ESG $394,663 HOPWA $798,367 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 3 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table 1 - 2. Summarize the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan This could be a restatement of items or a table listed elsewhere in the plan or a reference to another location. It may also contain any essential items from the housing and homeless needs assessment, the housing market analysis or the strategic plan. The Consolidated Plan establishes the following priorities for all project and programs funded with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds. Objectives and strategies are noted below each priority listed below: Priority Need: Affordable Housing Objectives/Strategies for Affordable Housing: AH-1: Expand housing opportunities for extremely low-income, very low-income, low-income, and moderate-income households through an increase in the supply of decent, safe, and affordable rental housing via new housing construction or rehabilitation. AH-2: Increase homeownership opportunities via the construction, acquisition, and/or rehabilitation of housing units for homeownership; and or direct financial assistance provided to low- to moderate- income homebuyers. AH-3: Maintain and preserve the existing affordable housing stock, including the stock of "Special Needs" housing. AH-4: Increase the supply of appropriate and supportive housing for special needs populations, which may include short-term tenant-based rental assistance. Priority Need: Reduce/Alleviate Homelessness Objectives/Strategies for Homelessness: H-1: Further "Housing First" approach to ending homelessness by supporting homeless outreach efforts, emergency shelter, transitional housing, and permanent housing with supportive services to help homeless persons achieve housing stability. H-2: Expand existing prevention services including emergency rental assistance, case management, housing search assistance, legal assistance, landlord mediation, money management and credit counseling. In addition to these objectives, the affordable housing and non-housing community development objectives of the Consolidated Plan also address the needs of the homeless and the problem of homelessness. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 4 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Priority Need: Non-Housing Community Development Objectives/Strategies for Public Services: CD-1 General Public Services: Ensure that opportunities and services are provided to improve the quality of life and independence for low-income persons (below 80 percent of Area Median Income), and ensure access to programs that promote prevention and early intervention related to a variety of social concerns such as substance abuse, hunger, and other issues. CD-2 Non-Homeless Special Needs Population: Ensure that opportunities and services are provided to improve the quality of life and independence for persons with special needs, such as elderly/frail elderly, persons with disabilities, battered spouses, abused children, persons with HIV/AIDS, illiterate adults, and migrant farmworkers. CD-3 Youth: Increase opportunities for children/youth to be healthy, succeed in school, and prepare for productive adulthood. CD-4 Fair Housing: Promote fair housing activities and affirmatively further fair housing. Objectives/Strategies for Economic Development: CD-5 Economic Development: Reduce the number of persons with incomes below the poverty level (annual income below $31,743), expand economic opportunities for extremely low-, very low- and low- income residents, and increase the viability of neighborhood commercial areas by providing job training/job placement services and technical assistance to microenterprises and small businesses. Objectives/Strategies for Infrastructure/Public Facilities: CD-6 Infrastructure and Accessibility: Maintain quality public facilities and adequate infrastructure, and ensure access for the mobility-impaired by addressing physical access barriers to public facilities. Priority Need: Administration Objectives/Strategies for Administration: CD-7 Administration: Support development of viable urban communities through extending and strengthening partnerships among all levels of government and the private sector, and administer federal grant programs in a fiscally prudent manner. 3. Evaluation of past performance DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 5 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) This is an evaluation of past performance that helped lead the grantee to choose its goals or projects. Contra Costa County is currently completing the fifth year of the 2015-2020 Consolidated Plan period (FY 2018/19). Most projects are on pace to meet and exceed their goals for the fiscal year. The County will continue to assess all funded activities to ensure that its Consolidated Plan annual goals and objectives for each priority are met. 4. Summary of Citizen Participation Process and consultation process Summary from citizen participation section of plan. On September 16, 2018, a Notice of Funding Availability/Request for Proposals (NOFA/RFP) for CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds was sent to the County's CDBG "Interested Parties" list, a list of over 600 individuals representing various non-profit organizations and public agencies throughout Contra Costa County. On September 16, 2018, the NOFA/RFP notice was posted/published in all editions of the Contra Costa Times and posted on the County's Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) website. On October 17, 2018, the CDBG "Kickoff" public meeting was held at City of Walnut Creek’s office located at 1666 N. Main Street, Walnut Creek, California. Approximately 30 people representing various non-profit and public agencies attended the Kickoff meeting. On April 23, 2019 the County's Affordable Housing Finance Committee held a public meeting to consider staff's affordable housing recommendations for the CDBG, HOME, and HOPWA Programs. Approximately 13 people representing various affordable housing development organizations attended the meeting. On May 4, 2019, the County's Draft Action Plan was made available to the public on the County's DCD website, and a hard copy was available to the public at the County's DCD physical location at 30 Muir Road, Martinez CA. The draft was available for public comment from May 4 through June 3, 2019. On May 4, 2019 and May 5, 2019, public notices were posted/published in all newspaper editions of the Contra Costa Times, announcing the June 11, 2019, County's Board of Supervisors public hearing to recommend CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds to public services, economic development, infrastructure/public facilities, affordable housing, and ESG projects/programs/activities. On May 13, 2019, the County's Family and Human Services Committee held a public meeting to hear staff's recommendations for the Public Service category of the County's CDBG Program and staff's recommendations under the County's ESG Program. Approximately 4 people, representing the various non-profit and public agencies that applied for CDBG funds under the Public Service category or for ESG funds, attended the meeting. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 6 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) On June 11, 2019, the Board of Supervisors public hearing was held. At that meeting, the County's FY 2019/20 CDBG/HOME/ESG/HOPWA Action Plan, including the recommendations for all affordable housing, public services, economic development, infrastructure/public facilities, and ESG Program projects, was considered and approved by the County's Board of Supervisors. 5. Summary of public comments This could be a brief narrative summary or reference an attached document from the Citizen Participation section of the Con Plan. The County did not receive any comments during public review period for the Action Plan, nor did it receive comments at any public hearings. 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them N/A 7. Summary N/A DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 7 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies - 91.200(b) 1. Agency/entity responsible for preparing/administering the Consolidated Plan The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source. Agency Role Name Department/Agency CDBG Administrator CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Department of Conservation and Development HOME Administrator CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Department of Conservation and Development ESG Administrator CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Department of Conservation and Development Table 2 – Responsible Agencies Narrative The Contra Costa HOME Consortium consists of the Contra Costa Urban County and four CDBG entitlement jurisdictions: Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. The CDBG Urban County consists of the unincorporated County and the 15 participating cities of the County. The ESG coverage area is the same as the CDBG Urban County area. The County is also a sub-grantee to the City of Oakland (Alameda County) for the Housing Opportunities for Persons with HIV/AIDs (HOPWA) program. The HOPWA coverage area is the entire County. Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information Gabriel Lemus: (925) 674-7882 Kristen Lackey: (925) 674-7793 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 8 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 9 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(l) 1. Introduction As part of this Action Plan development, County CDBG staff undertook an outreach program to consult and coordinate nonprofit agencies, affordable housing providers, and government agencies. On September 16, 2018, County staff sent out a notice to the County's CDBG "Interested Parties" list, a list of over 600 individuals representing various non-profit organizations and public agencies throughout Contra Costa County. This list consists of various persons representing non-profit service providers that cater to the needs of low and moderate income households and persons with special needs, including persons with disabilities; affordable housing providers, housing professionals, and housing advocates; public agencies (other County departments or participating cities departments; improvement districts, school districts, etc.) economic development organizations, community groups, and elected officials. All of these agencies were notified, via e-mail, about participating in the FY 2019/20 CDBG "Kickoff" Meeting that took place October 17, 2018, in which interested agencies were informed about applying for CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds, and about participating in the overall Action Plan process. Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, me ntal health and service agencies (91.215(l)). Contra Costa County works closely with public and private affordable housing providers as well as the County's public health department. The Housing staff have frequent conversations with the County Housing Authority staff and work to coordinate the allocation of project-based Section 8 vouchers to HOME and CDBG-funded developments in order to increase the number of extremely low-income tenant households. The County Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) coordinates the allocation of Emergency Solutions Grant funds with the County's Homeless Program office and the County’s Council on Homelessness (formerly the Contra Costa Interagency Council on Homelessness), the County’s Continuum of Care (CoC) Board. CDBG funds are frequently used to assist in the development of housing for persons with special needs including those living with physical and mental health issues. DCD staff consults with the appropriate staff in the Health Services Department (HSD) to confirm the developments will have access to adequate funding for operations. DCD works closely with County HSD Behavioral Health Services Division staff to coordinate funding for permanent supportive housing for persons with mental illnesses. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 10 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness. County CDBG/ESG staff consults with the County's Council on Homeless and the CoC. The Council on Homelessness and the CoC respectively meet on a monthly and quarterly basis and consist of members of the non-profit community and advocacy groups, the interfaith community, business organizations and other relevant community groups. Both the Council on Homelessness and the overall CoC implement key strategies that are identified in the five-year CoC Plan and the County's Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction’s area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards for and evaluate outcomes of projects and activities assisted by ESG funds, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the operation and administration of HMIS County CDBG/ESG staff works closely with the local CoC in the allocation of ESG funds, in developing performance standards, evaluating outcomes, and in the administration of HMIS. County CDBG/ESG staff consults with the CoC and the County's Council on Homelessness, which provides advice and input on the operations of homeless services, program operation and program development efforts in Contra Costa County. The Council on Homelessness has developed a strategic plan that serves as an update to the Ten-Year Plan to End Homelessness. In addition, various staff members from multiple HOME Consortium jurisdictions, including the County, currently serve on the Council on Homelessness and are closely involved in homeless services Countywide. 2. Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and consultations DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 11 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table 2 – Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization Contra Costa Health Services Homeless Program Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Persons with HIV/AIDS Services-homeless Services - Victims Health Agency Other government - County Grantee Department What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth Homelessness Strategy Non-Homeless Special Needs HOPWA Strategy Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The Contra Costa County Health Services Department was consulted to provide information on various special needs populations, including Homeless populations, and services provided to those populations. 2 Agency/Group/Organization RAINBOW COMMUNITY CENTER OF CONTRA COSTA Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Elderly Persons Services-Persons with HIV/AIDS What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 12 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The Rainbow Community Center was consulted to provide information regarding seniors and those living with HIV/AIDS residing in the County and the services provided to those populations. 3 Agency/Group/Organization CONTRA COSTA HOUSING AUTHORITY Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing PHA Other government - County Regional organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Public Housing Needs Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? County housing staff consults with the HACCC at least quarterly. The two agencies coordinate on the Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plan, Housing Authority Five- year Plan, and Housing Authority Annual Plan. In addition, staff coordinates allocations of HOME, CDBG and project-based Section 8 vouchers whenever possible. 4 Agency/Group/Organization SHELTER INC. OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing Services-homeless Regional organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth Homelessness Strategy DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 13 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Shelter, Inc. was consulted to provide information regarding homelessness and those at risk of becoming homeless in Contra Costa County and the services provided to that population. 5 Agency/Group/Organization CONTRA COSTA SENIOR LEGAL SERVICES Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Elderly Persons What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Non-Homeless Special Needs Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Contra Costa Senior Legal Services was consulted to provide information regarding elderly/frail elderly residing in the County and the services provided to that population. 6 Agency/Group/Organization WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD - SMALL BUSINESS DEV. CENTER Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Employment Other government - County Other government - Local Regional organization Grantee Department What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Market Analysis Economic Development Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The Workforce Development Board was consulted to provide information on the County's economic market, the overall small business/microenterprise community, and overall workforce. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 14 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 7 Agency/Group/Organization STAND! AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing Services-Children Services-Victims of Domestic Violence Services - Victims Regional organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth Non-Homeless Special Needs Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? STAND! was consulted to provide information regarding the needs of victims of domestic violence in Contra Costa County and the services provided to this population. 8 Agency/Group/Organization Contra Costa Continuum of Care Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-homeless Other government - County Other government - Local Regional organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Homeless Needs - Chronically homeless Homeless Needs - Families with children Homelessness Needs - Veterans Homelessness Needs - Unaccompanied youth Homelessness Strategy Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? The Contra Costa County Continuum of Care was consulted to provide information on the needs of the County's overall homeless population, and services provided to that population. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 15 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 9 Agency/Group/Organization BAY AREA LEGAL AID Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Housing Service-Fair Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Consultation? Housing Need Assessment Non-Homeless Special Needs Briefly describe how the Agency/Group/Organization was consulted. What are the anticipated outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? Bay Area Legal Aid was consulted to provide information regarding fair housing choice, impediments to fair housing, and tenant/landlord resolution issues. Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting No agency types were intentionally excluded. Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of Care Coalition of Homeless Services Providers Through the outreach process, the Urban County has identified homelessness and homelessness prevention services as a priority for the CDBG and ESG programs. These services will complement the Continuum of Strategy. Table 3 – Other local / regional / federal planning efforts Narrative DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 16 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-12 Participation - 91.401, 91.105, 91.200(c) 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal-setting On September 16, 2018, a Notice of Funding Availability/Request for Proposals (NOFA/RFP) for CDBG, HOME, and HOPWA funds was sent to the County's CDBG "Interested Parties" list, a list of over 600 individuals representing various non-profit organizations and public agencies throughout Contra Costa County. The NOFA/RFP notice was also posted/published in all editions of the Contra Costa Times and posted on the County's Department of Conservation and Development (DCD) website on the same day. On October 17, 2018, the CDBG, HOME, and HOPWA Kickoff public meeting was held at City of Walnut Creekâ¿¿s office located at 1666 N. Main Street, Walnut Creek, California. Approximately 30 people representing various non-profit and public agencies attended the meeting. On April 23, 2019, the County's Affordable Housing Finance Committee held a public meeting to consider staff's affordable housing recommendations for the CDBG and HOME programs. Approximately 13 people representing various affordable housing development organizations attended the meeting. On May 4, 2019, the County's Draft Action Plan was made available to the public on the County's DCD website, and a hard copy was available to the public at the County's DCD physical location at 30 Muir Road, Martinez CA. The draft was available for public comment from May 4, 2019 through June 3, 2019. On May 4, 2019 and May 5, 2019, public notices were posted/published in all newspaper editions of the Contra Costa Times announcing the June 11, 2019, County's Board of Supervisors public hearing to recommend CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds to public services, economic development, infrastructure/public facilities, affordable housing, and ESG projects/programs/activities. On May 13, 2019, the County's Family and Human Services Committee held a public meeting to hear staff's recommendations for the Public Service category of the County's CDBG Program and staff's recommendations under the County's ESG Program. Approximately 4 persons representing the various non-profit and public agencies that applied for CDBG funds under the Public Service category or for ESG funds attended the meeting. On June 11, 2019, the Board of Supervisors public hearing was held. At that meeting, the County's FY 2019/20 CDBG/HOME/ESG/HOPWA Action Plan, including the recommendations for all public services, economic development, infrastructure/public facilities, affordable housing, and ESG projects, was considered and approved by the County's Board of Supervisors. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 17 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Citizen Participation Outreach Sort Orde r Mode of Outreach Target of O utreach Summary of response/att endance Summary of comment s receive d Summary o f comments not accepted and reason s URL (If applicable) 1 Internet Outreach Non- targeted/br oad community Contra Costa County emailed a NOFA/RFP for CDBG, HOME, and HOPWA funds to the County's "interested parties" list, a list of over 600 individuals representing various non- profit organizations and public agencies throughout Contra Costa County. N/A N/A DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 18 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Sort Orde r Mode of Outreach Target of O utreach Summary of response/att endance Summary of comment s receive d Summary o f comments not accepted and reason s URL (If applicable) 2 Newspap er Ad Non- targeted/br oad community The County posted a newspaper notice announcing its "CDBG, HOME, and HOPWA Kickoff Meeting" for interested persons, non- profits, and public agencies to attend. N/A N/A 3 Newspap er Ad Non- targeted/br oad community The County held its "CDBG, HOME, and HOPWA Kickoff Meeting" on October 17, 2018. Approximatel y 30 individuals attended representing various non- profit organizations and public agencies N/A N/A DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 19 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Sort Orde r Mode of Outreach Target of O utreach Summary of response/att endance Summary of comment s receive d Summary o f comments not accepted and reason s URL (If applicable) 4 Newspap er Ad Non- targeted/br oad community Public notices were posted/publi shed on May 4, 2019 and May 5, 2019 to announce that the full FY 2019/20 Action Plan, including the recommenda tions to the other CDBG categories (public services, economic development , and infrastructur e/public facilities, and housing) and the ESG Program, would be considered at the June 11, 2019 Board of Supervisors public hearing. N/A N/A DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 20 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Sort Orde r Mode of Outreach Target of O utreach Summary of response/att endance Summary of comment s receive d Summary o f comments not accepted and reason s URL (If applicable) 5 Public Meeting Affordable Housing Community (advocates/ developers) On April 23, 2019, the County's Affordable Housing Finance Committee held public meetings to consider staff's affordable housing recommenda tions for the CDBG and HOME programs. Approximatel y thirteen persons, representing various affordable housing development organizations , attended the meeting. N/A N/A DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 21 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Sort Orde r Mode of Outreach Target of O utreach Summary of response/att endance Summary of comment s receive d Summary o f comments not accepted and reason s URL (If applicable) 6 Internet Outreach Non- targeted/br oad community On May 4, 2019, the County's Draft Action Plan was made available to the public on the County's DCD website, and a hard copy was available to the public at the County's DCD physical location at 30 Muir Road, Martinez CA. The draft was available for public comment from May 4, 2019 through June 3, 2019. N/A N/A http://www.contracosta. ca.gov/4823/Community- Development-Block- Grant DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 22 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Sort Orde r Mode of Outreach Target of O utreach Summary of response/att endance Summary of comment s receive d Summary o f comments not accepted and reason s URL (If applicable) 7 Public Meeting Non- targeted/br oad community On May 13, 2019, the County's Family and Human Services Committee held a public meeting to hear staff's recommenda tions for the Public Service category for the County's CDBG Program and to hear staff's recommenda tions for the County's ESG Program. Approximatel y 4 persons representing the various non-profits and public agencies that applied for CDBG funds under the Public Service category or for funds under the County's ESG Program attended the meeting. N/A N/A DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 23 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Sort Orde r Mode of Outreach Target of O utreach Summary of response/att endance Summary of comment s receive d Summary o f comments not accepted and reason s URL (If applicable) 8 Public Hearing Non- targeted/br oad community On June 11, 2019, the Board of Supervisors public hearing was held. At that meeting, the County's FY 2019/20 CDBG/HOME /ESG/HOPW A Action Plan, including the recommenda tions for all affordable housing, public services, economic development , infrastructur e/public facilities, and ESG projects, was considered and approved by the County's Board of Supervisors. N/A N/A DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 24 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Table 4 – Citizen Participation Outreach DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 25 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Expected Resources AP-15 Expected Resources - 91.420(b), 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction Contra Costa anticipates that over the five-year course of the Consolidated Plan period, it will have CDBG, HOME, ESG, HOPWA (pass through from the City of Oakland) funds, and NSP program income available. These federal funds will be used to leverage public and private resources in all program areas. FY 2019/20 is the fifth year of the County's five-year Consolidated Plan period. The Annual Action Plan budgets reflect approximately one-fifth of the anticipated resources over the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan. Anticipated Resources Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Remainder of ConPlan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ CDBG public - federal Acquisition Admin and Planning Economic Development Housing Public Improvements Public Services 4,588,037 1,100,000 782,033 6,470,070 0 Expected amount available is based on the FY 2019/20 entitlement allocation to the County from HUD, which includes anticipated Program Income during the fiscal year and prior year funds that have been recaptured from closed/completed or cancelled projects. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 26 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Remainder of ConPlan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ HOME public - federal Acquisition Homebuyer assistance Homeowner rehab Multifamily rental new construction Multifamily rental rehab New construction for ownership TBRA 3,171,988 500,000 0 3,671,988 0 Expected amount available is based on the FY 2019/20 entitlement allocation to the County from HUD, which includes anticipated Program Income during the fiscal year and prior year funds that have been recaptured from closed/completed or cancelled projects. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 27 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected Amount Available Remainder of ConPlan $ Narrative Description Annual Allocation: $ Program Income: $ Prior Year Resources: $ Total: $ ESG public - federal Conversion and rehab for transitional housing Financial Assistance Overnight shelter Rapid re-housing (rental assistance) Rental Assistance Services Transitional housing 394,663 0 0 394,663 0 Expected amount available is based on the FY 2019/20 entitlement allocation to the County from HUD. Other public - federal Acquisition Housing Multifamily rental new construction Multifamily rental rehab 0 0 0 0 650,000 The County is a sub-grantee to the City of Oakland (Alameda County) for the Housing Opportunities for Persons with HIV/AIDs (HOPWA) program. The HOPWA area is the entire County. Expected amount available based on current allocation for remaining 1 year of the Consolidated Plan period. Table 3 - Expected Resources – Priority Table DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 28 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied County policy requires projects funded with CDBG funds to provide a minimum match as follows: 10 percent required from non-profit organizations, 25 percent from local government agencies, and 100 percent from for-profit entities. Public service and economic development projects (sponsored by non-profit organizations and public agencies) receiving multiple year funding are further required to increase the level of match for each year of funding up to 50 percent match after year five. In accordance with federal regulations, all projects funded with Consortium HOME funds are required to provide a minimum 25 percent permanent match to the project from non-federal sources. In accordance with federal regulations, all projects funded with ESG funds are required to provide a minimum 100 percent match from non- federal sources. HOPWA regulations do not require matching funds. However, housing development projects using HOPWA funds must provide HOPWA-assisted units in proportion to the amount of HOPWA funds in the project. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 29 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) If appropriate, describe publically owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan The County, as the Housing Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency, owns land that will be used for affordable housing developments in Bay Point and Rodeo. The Housing Successor selected developers for each site and are negotiating dispostion and development agreements. Discussion The sale and transfer of the above-referenced parcels will be the last of new affordable housing initiatives in the former redevelopment project areas. The State passed several laws in 2017 that are intended to facilitate affordable housing development. These new laws include a $75 recording fee on residential real property transactions. The revenue from this fee will be used to fund affordable housing development. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 30 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Annual Goals and Objectives AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives - 91.420, 91.220(c)(3)&(e) Goals Summary Information Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 1 AH-1 New Construction of Affordable Rental Housing 2015 2020 Affordable Housing Contra Costa County Affordable Housing CDBG: $1,550,000 HOME: $100,000 ESG: $0 HOPWA: $0 Rental units constructed: 25 Household Housing Unit 2 AH-2 Homeownership Opportunities 2015 2020 Affordable Housing 3 AH-3 Maintain and Preserve Affordable Housing 2015 2020 Affordable Housing Non-Homeless Special Needs Contra Costa County Affordable Housing CDBG: $340,800 HOME: $1,325,000 ESG: $0 HOPWA: $0 Rental units rehabilitated: 25 Household Housing Unit Homeowner Housing Rehabilitated: 15 Household Housing Unit 4 AH-4 New Supportive Housing - Special Needs 2015 2020 Affordable Housing Homeless Non-Homeless Special Needs Contra Costa County Affordable Housing CDBG: $0 HOME: $487,000 ESG: $0 HOPWA: $0 Rental units constructed: 10 Household Housing Unit Rental units rehabilitated: 6 Household Housing Unit HIV/AIDS Housing Operations: 2 Household Housing Unit DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 31 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 5 CD-1 General Public Services 2015 2020 Non-Housing Community Development Non-Housing Community Development CDBG: $304,500 HOME: $0 ESG: $0 HOPWA: $0 Public service activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 5000 Persons Assisted 6 CD-2 Non-Homeless Special Needs Population 2015 2020 Non-Homeless Special Needs Non-Housing Community Development Contra Costa County Non-Housing Community Development CDBG: $192,000 HOME: $0 ESG: $0 HOPWA: $0 Public service activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 1348 Persons Assisted 7 CD-3 Youth 2015 2020 Non-Housing Community Development Contra Costa County Non-Housing Community Development CDBG: $71,000 HOME: $0 ESG: $0 HOPWA: $0 Public service activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 860 Persons Assisted 8 CD-4 Fair Housing 2015 2020 Non-Housing Community Development Contra Costa County Non-Housing Community Development CDBG: $40,000 HOME: $0 ESG: $0 HOPWA: $0 Public service activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 40 Persons Assisted 9 CD-5 Economic Development 2015 2020 Non-Housing Community Development Contra Costa County Non-Housing Community Development CDBG: $330,636 HOME: $0 ESG: $0 HOPWA: $0 Public service activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 16 Persons Assisted Jobs created/retained: 2 Jobs Businesses assisted: 60 Businesses Assisted DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 32 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator 10 CD-6 Infrastructure/Public Facilities 2015 2020 Non-Housing Community Development Contra Costa County Non-Housing Community Development CDBG: $1,290,840 HOME: $0 ESG: $0 HOPWA: $0 Public Facility or Infrastructure Activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 500 Persons Assisted 11 H-1 Housing & Supportive Services for the Homeless 2015 2020 Affordable Housing Homeless Contra Costa County Homelessness Prevention CDBG: $109,224 HOME: $0 ESG: $161,865 HOPWA: $0 Public service activities other than Low/Moderate Income Housing Benefit: 3200 Persons Assisted 12 H-2 Prevention Services for Homeless 2015 2020 Homeless Contra Costa County Non-Housing Community Development CDBG: $25,075 HOME: $0 ESG: $87,678 HOPWA: $0 Tenant-based rental assistance / Rapid Rehousing: 30 Households Assisted Homelessness Prevention: 30 Persons Assisted 13 CD-7 Administration 2015 2020 General Administration of the CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA Programs Contra Costa County Administration CDBG: $811,528 HOME: $188,709 ESG: $20,233 HOPWA: $0 Other: 4 Other Table 4 – Goals Summary Goal Descriptions DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 33 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 1 Goal Name AH-1 New Construction of Affordable Rental Housing Goal Description The Contra Costa Consortium has used HOME funds primarily for new construction of affordable rental and for-sale housing. The 2013 HOME final rule effectively tightened the HOME commitment and expenditure timelines. The County is allocating funds for new construction in FY 2019/20. However, the County may need to adjust the HOME program in future years and fund rehabilitation and energy efficiency improvements in existing structures in order to meet the tight expenditure deadlines. CDBG funds are used to support new construction through land acquisition. 2 Goal Name AH-2 Homeownership Opportunities Goal Description 3 Goal Name AH-3 Maintain and Preserve Affordable Housing Goal Description Maintaining and preserving affordable housing is a growing need as existing affordable housing reaches the end of affordability terms. Increasing market rate rents are an incentive for private owners to convert their affordable units to market rate units. Affordable housing developers purchase existing buildings when feasible in an effort to maintain existing affordable housing. 4 Goal Name AH-4 New Supportive Housing - Special Needs Goal Description Include units for persons with disabilities in new multi-family developments. Support development of appropriate permanent supportive housing, which may be multi-family developments, single room occupancy facilities, or group homes. 5 Goal Name CD-1 General Public Services Goal Description Ensure that opportunities and services are provided to improve the quality of life and independence for lower-income persons, and ensure access to programs that promote prevention and early intervention related to a variety of social concerns such as substance abuse, hunger, and other issues. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 34 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 6 Goal Name CD-2 Non-Homeless Special Needs Population Goal Description Ensure that opportunities and services are provided to improve the quality of life and independence for persons with special needs, such as elderly/frail elderly, persons with disabilities, victims of domestic violence, abused/neglected children, persons with HIV/AIDS, illiterate adults, and migrant farmworkers. 7 Goal Name CD-3 Youth Goal Description Increase opportunities for children/youth to be healthy, succeed in school, and prepare for productive adulthood. 8 Goal Name CD-4 Fair Housing Goal Description Continue to promote fair housing activities and affirmatively further fair housing. 9 Goal Name CD-5 Economic Development Goal Description Reduce the number of persons with incomes below the poverty level, expand economic opportunities for very low- and low-income residents, and increase the viability of neighborhood commercial areas. Strategies include:  Support job training, retraining, and employment search services for low-income persons; and  Provide technical assistance and capital (loan or grant) to small businesses/micro-enterprises to develop and/or expand capacity and produce jobs for low-income persons. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 35 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 10 Goal Name CD-6 Infrastructure/Public Facilities Goal Description Maintain quality public facilities and adequate infrastructure and ensure access to public facilities for the disabled. Strategies include:  To construct or improve public facilities and infrastructure including, but not limited to, providing and improving access to facilities for persons with disabilities. This may include directly improving or constructing facilities or infrastructure in low-income areas or providing assistance to non-profit agencies that serve low-income populations.  To remove barriers to the safe travel of persons with disabilities that exist in the public right-of-way.  To make improvements to the public right-of-way to enhance public safety and accessibility, and to improve public health, and to promote the provision of a “complete streets program.” Improvements will be targeted to areas where the current level of improvements is less than the current standard. 11 Goal Name H-1 Housing & Supportive Services for the Homeless Goal Description Further “Housing First” approach to ending homelessness by supporting homeless outreach efforts, emergency shelter, transitional housing, and permanent housing with supportive services to help homeless persons achieve housing stability. 12 Goal Name H-2 Prevention Services for Homeless Goal Description Expand existing prevention services including emergency rental assistance, case management, housing search assistance, legal assistance, landlord mediation, money management and credit counseling. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 36 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 13 Goal Name CD-7 Administration Goal Description Support development of viable urban communities through extending and strengthening partnerships among all levels of government and the private sector, and administer federal grant programs in a fiscally prudent manner. Strategies include:  To continue the collaborative administration with the other Consortia jurisdictions for the County’s housing and community development programs undertaken under this Strategic Plan. This effort will include common policies and procedures for requests for the use of funds, subrecipient reporting, record-keeping, and monitoring.  To support the efforts of the housing authorities of the City of Pittsburg and Contra Costa County. Members will also cooperatively further the efforts of the Contra Costa Council on Homelessness (previously known as CCICH). DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 37 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-35 Projects - 91.420, 91.220(d) Introduction The projects below all meet specific Consolidated Plan priorities and goals. The 2015-2020 Consolidated Plan establishes the priorities for affordable housing and non-housing community development (Public Service, Infrastructure/Public Facilities, and Economic Development) programs and projects funded with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds. In addition to the Consolidated Plan priorities, the Board has established a priority for housing projects which include units affordable to extremely-low income households. The project summary below provides information on specific housing projects and non- housing funded with FY 2019/20 CDBG, HOME and HOPWA funds. Additional HOPWA funds may be allocated later in the year through separate competitive application process. # Project Name 1 Bay Area Legal Aid - Tenant Landlord Housing Services Collaborative 2 Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond: Home Equity Preservation Alliance 3 Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond: Multicultural/Senior Family Center 4 Community Violence Solutions: CIC Child Sexual Assault Intervention 5 Contra Costa Service Integration Program - SparkPoint Contra Costa 6 Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano 7 Monument Crisis Center 8 New Horizons Career Development Center 9 Richmond Public Library 10 St. Vincent de Paul of Contra Costa County 11 Village Community Resource Center 12 Contra Costa Senior Legal Services 13 Court Appointed Special Advocates 14 Lamorinda Spirit Van Senior Transportation Program 15 Lion's Center for the Visually Impaired 16 Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services: Care Management 17 Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services: Senior Nutrition - CC Cafes 18 Ombudsman Services of Contra Costa 19 Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District: Senior Service Network 20 Rainbow Community Center of Contra Costa 21 Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance - West Contra Costa Family Justice Center 22 West County Adult Day Care 23 A Place of Learning 24 East Bay Center for Performing Arts 25 Girls Inc. of West Contra Costa County: Afterschool and Education Enrichment Program DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 38 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) # Project Name 26 Mt. Diablo Unified School District 27 RYSE, Inc. - Career Pathway Program 28 James Morehouse Project / YMCA of the East Bay 29 ECHO Housing: Fair Housing Services 30 Contra Costa Health Services: Adult Continuum of Services 31 Contra Costa Crisis Center 32 Loaves & Fishes of Contra Costa 33 Shelter Inc.: Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Program 34 CocoKids: Road to Success 35 Multicultural Institute: Lifeskills/Day Labor Program 36 Opportunity Junction: Bay Point Career Development Services 37 Opportunity Junction: Job Training and Placement Program 38 Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center: Renaissance Richmond 39 West Contra Costa Business Dev. Center, Inc.: Emerging Entrepreneurs Program 40 Workforce Development Board of Contra Costa County: Small Business Development Center 41 City of Oakley - Oakley Senior Center Improvements 42 City of Richmond - Richmond Recreation Center 43 Contra Costa County Public Works Department - Montalvin Park Sports Courts 44 Greater Richmond Interfaith Program (GRIP) - Homeless Shelter Repairs 45 Town of Moraga - ADA Restroom and Pathway Upgrades 46 Veteran's Square 47 1313 Galindo 48 Legacy Court 49 Las Juntas 50 CCC/Habitat for Humanity: Neighborhood Preservation Program 51 VA Housing Emergency Safety Improvements 52 ESG19 Contra Costa County 53 CDBG Program Administration 54 HOME Program Administration 55 CDBG Unallocated Funds 57 HOPWA - Permanent Housing (unallocated) 58 HOPWA Administration Table 5 – Project Information Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs Affordable Housing Projects: The allocation priorities include project feasibility and timeliness. Projects that can begin construction within 12 months of the date of the County's grant agreement with HUD have priority. This is an obstacle to addressing underserved needs. Some developments that may be DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 39 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) able to serve extremely-low income households or persons with a disability are difficult to finance. With tight time limits on the commitment and expenditure of CDBG, HOME and HOPWA funds, the County cannot make early funding allocations to these projects. Projects that serve households with higher incomes are easier to finance and therefore move more quickly. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 40 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-38 Project Summary Project Summary Information DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 41 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 1 Project Name Bay Area Legal Aid - Tenant Landlord Housing Services Collaborative Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $80,000 Description Provide landlord/tenant counseling and legal services for 550 landlords/tenants. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Bay Area Legal Aid will provide landlord/tenant counseling and legal assistance to 550 lower-income Urban County households. Location Description 1025 MacDonald Avenue Richmond, CA 94801 Planned Activities Bay Area Legal Aid will provide landlord/tenant counseling and legal assistance to 550 lower-income Urban County households. 2 Project Name Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond: Home Equity Preservation Alliance Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $25,000 Description Provide the following services to 80 low-income, Urban County, homeowners: 1) foreclosure counseling and case management, including legal advice and representation; 2) foreclosure clinics and referrals; and 3) foreclosure rescue scam and predatory lending education. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 80 low-income homeowners, primarily in West County. Location Description 1535-A Fred Jackson Way, Richmond, CA 94801 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 42 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Planned Activities Provide the following services to 80 low-income, Urban County, homeowners: 1) foreclosure counseling and case management, including legal advice and representation; 2) foreclosure clinics and referrals; and 3) foreclosure rescue scam and predatory lending education. 3 Project Name Community Housing Development Corporation of North Richmond: Multicultural/Senior Family Center Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $55,000 Description Operate and maintain a community center for 400 residents of North Richmond, providing educational, recreational, and nutritional programs to a diverse community with a primary focus on senior citizens. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 400 residents of North Richmond, primarily senior citizens. Location Description 515 Silver Avenue, Richmond, CA 94801 Planned Activities Operate and maintain a community center for 400 residents of North Richmond, providing educational, recreational, and nutritional programs to a diverse community with a primary focus on senior citizens. 4 Project Name Community Violence Solutions: CIC Child Sexual Assault Intervention Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $15,000 Description In-depth forensic interview, mental health services, advocacy, and case management services for 70 child victims of sexual assault, and their families, to positively impact behavior and psychological well-being. Target Date 6/30/2020 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 43 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 70 child victims of sexual assault, and their families, in the Urban County. Location Description 2101 Van Ness Street, San Pablo, CA 94806 Planned Activities In-depth forensic interview, mental health services, advocacy, and case management services for 70 child victims of sexual assault, and their families, to positively impact behavior and psychological well-being. 5 Project Name Contra Costa Service Integration Program - SparkPoint Contra Costa Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $12,000 Description Provide services to 200 Urban County residents to assist them in obtaining and maintaining employment, improve their careers. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 200 Urban County residents, primarily Bay Point community residents. Location Description Community Career Center located at 3105 Willow Pass Road, Bay Point, CA 94565 Planned Activities Provide services to 200 Urban County residents to assist them in obtaining and maintaining employment, improve their careers. 6 Project Name Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $46,500 Description Provide food to over 9,300 low-income persons in the Urban County. Target Date 6/30/2020 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 44 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 9,300 low-income persons in the Urban County. Location Description P.O. Box 6324, Concord, CA 94524 and numerous other site locations. Planned Activities Provide food to over 9,300 low-income persons in the Urban County. 7 Project Name Monument Crisis Center Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $15,000 Description Provide wrap-around safety net services through on-site food distribution, direct referrals to shelter, workshops for financial assistance and employment, referrals to healthcare, and on-site legal and crisis support services. At least 2,000 lower income Urban County residents will be provided services. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 2000 low-income Urban County residents. Location Description 1990 Market Street, Concord, CA 94520 Planned Activities Provide wrap-around safety net services through on-site food distribution, direct referrals to shelter, workshops for financial assistance and employment, referrals to healthcare, and on-site legal and crisis support services. At least 2,000 lower income Urban County residents will be provided services. 8 Project Name New Horizons Career Development Center Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $25,000 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 45 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Description The purpose of this program is to provide ongoing job readiness education, job training, life skills, and placement services to 300 persons who are unemployed or underemployed. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 300 West County residents, primarily from Rodeo Location Description 199 Parker Avenue, Rodeo, CA 94572 Planned Activities The purpose of this program is to provide ongoing job readiness education, job training, life skills, and placement services to 300 persons who are unemployed or underemployed. 9 Project Name Richmond Public Library Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-3 Youth Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $12,000 Description The program will expand the current Mobile Library Services to serve 125 seniors living in areas of Richmond that have limited access to computers and library services. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities The program will serve 60 seniors living in Richmond. Location Description Services will be provided at various sites that may include the Richmond Annex Senior Center, Nevin Community Center, Shields- Reid Community Center, Parchester Community Center, and potentially two senior residential sites including Heritage Park at Hilltop and Richmond Macdonald Senior Apartments. Planned Activities The program will expand the current Mobile Library Services to serve 125 seniors living in areas of Richmond that have limited access to computers and library services. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 46 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 10 Project Name St. Vincent de Paul of Contra Costa County Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $12,000 Description Provide free urgent and chronic medical care to 480 uninsured clients in the Urban County. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 480 uninsured clients in the Urban County. Location Description RotaCare Pittsburg Free Medical Clinic located at 2110 Gladstone Drive, Pittsburg, CA 94565. Planned Activities Provide free urgent and chronic medical care to 480 uninsured clients in the Urban County. 11 Project Name Village Community Resource Center Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-3 Youth Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $13,000 Description VCRC will operate its After-school Academy program. A total of 115 children will be provided after-school tutoring services. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 115 East County youth, primarily residing in Brentwood. Location Description 633 Village Drive, Brentwood, CA 94513 Planned Activities VCRC will operate its After-school Academy program. A total of 115 children will be provided after-school tutoring services. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 47 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 12 Project Name Contra Costa Senior Legal Services Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $12,000 Description Provide free legal advice to 200 Urban County seniors, resulting in the retention of housing, protection from physical and financial abuse, and the provision of consumer and individual rights. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 200 Urban County seniors. Location Description 2702 Clayton Road, Suite 202, Concord, CA 94519 Planned Activities Provide free legal advice to 200 Urban County seniors, resulting in the retention of housing, protection from physical and financial abuse, and the provision of consumer and individual rights. 13 Project Name Court Appointed Special Advocates Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-2 Non-Homeless Special Needs Population Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $18,000 Description Provide advocacy and representation services to 37 Urban County abused and neglected children who are wards of the County's Juvenile Dependency Court as a way to improve access to health and social services and a safe and permanent living situation. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 37 Urban County abused and neglected children who are wards of the County's Juvenile Dependency Court. Location Description 2151 Salvio Street, Suite 295, Concord, CA 94520 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 48 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Planned Activities Provide advocacy and representation services to 37 Urban County abused and neglected children who are wards of the County's Juvenile Dependency Court as a way to improve access to health and social services and a safe and permanent living situation. 14 Project Name Lamorinda Spirit Van Senior Transportation Program Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description Provide free or low-cost transportation to seniors living in Lafayette, Moraga, and Orinda. Transportation to medical and other personal appointments, grocery and sundry shopping, exercise and other classes will be provided to 160 seniors. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 160 Central County senior citizens. Location Description 500 St. Marys Road, Lafayette, CA 94549 Planned Activities Provide free or low-cost transportation to seniors living in Lafayette, Moraga, and Orinda. Transportation to medical and other personal appointments, grocery and sundry shopping, exercise and other classes will be provided to 160 seniors. 15 Project Name Lion's Center for the Visually Impaired Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-2 Non-Homeless Special Needs Population Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description Provide in-home independent living skills instruction and training to 42 visually impaired adults throughout the Urban County so they will maintain their independence and avoid institutionalization. Target Date 6/30/2020 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 49 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 42 Visually impaired adults throughout the Urban County, most are elderly. Location Description Most services are provided at the clients' home, but Lion's main office is located at 175 Alvarado Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565. Planned Activities Provide in-home independent living skills instruction and training to 42 visually impaired adults throughout the Urban County so they will maintain their independence and avoid institutionalization. 16 Project Name Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services: Care Management Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $15,000 Description Provide care management services to 140 Urban County seniors resulting in the resolution of issues affecting health and wellness, quality of life, and the ability to live independently. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 140 Urban County seniors. Location Description 1300 Civic Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Planned Activities Provide care management services to 140 Urban County seniors resulting in the resolution of issues affecting health and wellness, quality of life, and the ability to live independently. 17 Project Name Meals on Wheels and Senior Outreach Services: Senior Nutrition - CC Cafes Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $15,000 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 50 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Description Provide hot and nutritious lunches to 250 Urban County seniors resulting in maintained and/or improved health and welfare. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 250 Urban County seniors. Location Description 1300 Civic Drive, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Planned Activities Provide hot and nutritious lunches to 250 Urban County seniors resulting in maintained and/or improved health and welfare. 18 Project Name Ombudsman Services of Contra Costa Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-2 Non-Homeless Special Needs Population Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description Provide advocacy services to 350 Urban County elders residing in longterm care facilities, insuring that these elderly residents receive proper health care and necessary daily living support. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 350 elderly and dependent seniors residing in long term care facilities. Location Description Services are provided at various locations (i.e. convalescent homes) throughout the County. Ombudsman's offices are located at 4415 Cowell Road, Suite 100, Concord, CA 94518. Planned Activities Provides 350 dependent seniors and elderly residing in long-term care facilities with access to safe and secure environments through the advocacy of trained and certified Ombudsmen for the purpose of creating a suitable living environment. 19 Project Name Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District: Senior Service Network Target Area Contra Costa County DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 51 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description Provide on-site care management services and crisis intervention to 150 Urban County seniors resulting in the prevention of displacement and/or premature institutionalization. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 150 Central County seniors. Location Description 233 Gregory Lane, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Planned Activities Provide on-site care management services and crisis intervention to 150 Urban County seniors resulting in the prevention of displacement and/or premature institutionalization. 20 Project Name Rainbow Community Center of Contra Costa Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-2 Non-Homeless Special Needs Population Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description Provide home/friendly visitor services and wellness calls to 60 Urban County seniors with HIV/AIDS and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender seniors to decrease isolation and improve quality of life. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 60 Urban County seniors with HIV/AIDS and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender seniors. Location Description The home/friendly visitor programs are provided at the clients' home, but the community center is located at 2118 Willow Pass Road, Suite 500, Concord, CA 94520. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 52 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Planned Activities Provide congregate meals, food pantry services, home/friendly visitor services and wellness calls to 60 Urban County People with AIDS and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender seniors to decrease isolation and improve quality of life. 21 Project Name Contra Costa Family Justice Alliance - West Contra Costa Family Justice Center Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $32,000 Description Operate and maintain the West County Family Justice Center in order to provide one-stop services to 300 victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse, elder abuse and human trafficking. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 300 victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse, elder abuse, and human trafficking in West County. Location Description 256 - 24th Street, Richmond, CA 94804 Planned Activities Operate and maintain the West County Family Justice Center in order to provide one-stop services to 300 victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse, elder abuse and human trafficking. 22 Project Name West County Adult Day Care Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $40,000 Description Provide day care services five days per week for 56 Urban County seniors with Alzheimer's/dementia resulting in retention of housing and delay of institutionalization. Target Date 6/30/2020 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 53 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 56 Urban County seniors. Location Description 1015 Nevin Avenue, Richmond, CA 94801 Planned Activities Provide day care services five days per week for 56 Urban County seniors with Alzheimer’s/dementia resulting in retention of housing and delay of institutionalization. 23 Project Name A Place of Learning Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-1 General Public Services Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description Provide free after-school/Summer mentoring/tutoring services to 60 low- income Urban County students resulting in improved academic performance and decision-making skills and increased self-esteem, as measured by pre- and post-participation evaluations and feedback from school staff and parents. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 60 low-income students (and their families) in East County, primarily in Brentwood, CA. Location Description 315 Orchard Drive, Brentwood, CA 94513 Planned Activities Provide free after-school/Summer mentoring/tutoring services to 60 low- income Urban County students resulting in improved academic performance and decision-making skills and increased self- esteem, as measured by pre- and post-participation evaluations and feedback from school staff and parents. 24 Project Name East Bay Center for Performing Arts Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-3 Youth Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 54 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Funding CDBG: $11,500 Description Provide literacy and performing arts summer programs to 150 children aged 3-9, resulting in improved academic performance, community building, and exposure to diverse global art traditions. Program performance will be measured via pre- and post-surveys taken by children and their guardians. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 150 West County children, aged 3-9, primarily from Richmond, CA. Location Description Agency Address: 339 - 11th Street, Richmond, CA 94801 Site Adresses: 230 Harbour Way S, Richmond, CA 94804 29 S 6th Street, Richmond, CA 94801 2801 Pullman Avenue, Richmond, CA 94804 5000 Hartnett Avenue, Richmond, CA 94804 Planned Activities Provide literacy and performing arts summer programs to 150 children aged 3-9, resulting in improved academic performance, community building, and exposure to diverse global art traditions. Program performance will be measured via pre- and post-surveys taken by children and guardians. 25 Project Name Girls Inc. of West Contra Costa County: Afterschool and Education Enrichment Program Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-3 Youth Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $11,000 Description Girls Inc. will operate its Summer/Afterschool Education Enrichment program. Children/youth from the City of Richmond/West County will be provided summer and after-school literacy and STEM enrichment programming. Target Date 6/30/2020 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 55 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Approximately 525 unduplicated children/youth will be provided summer and after-school literacy and STEM enrichment programming. Location Description 260 Broadway, Richmond, CA 94804 Planned Activities Girls Inc. will provide its Summer/Afterschool Education Enrichment program. Children/youth from the City of Richmond/West County will be provided summer and after-school literacy and STEM enrichment programming. 26 Project Name Mt. Diablo Unified School District Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-3 Youth Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description Provide after school enrichment classes for 580 K-8 students in Bay Point, resulting in greater understanding of the content of the enrichment services, connection to and engagement in school, and academic improvement. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 580 K-8 Bay Point students. Location Description 1266 San Carlos Avenue, Room A6, Concord, CA 94518 Planned Activities Provide after school enrichment classes for 580 K-8 students in Bay Point, resulting in greater understanding of the content of the enrichment services, connection to and engagement in school, and academic improvement. 27 Project Name RYSE, Inc. - Career Pathway Program Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-3 Youth Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 56 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Funding CDBG: $40,000 Description Operate the Career Pathway Program by providing career development and soft skills support, media arts skill development, paid work experience opportunities, and academic enrichment and interventions. A total of 230 West County youth will be provided services during the year. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 230 West County youth, primarily in Richmond. Location Description 205 - 41st Street, Richmond, CA 94805 Planned Activities Operate the Career Pathway Program by providing career development and soft skills support, media arts skill development, paid work experience opportunities, and academic enrichment and interventions. A total of 230 West County youth will be provided services during the year. 28 Project Name James Morehouse Project / YMCA of the East Bay Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-3 Youth Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $10,000 Description Provide comprehensive mental health and student support services to 110 students attending El Cerrito High School resulting in improved well-being and an increase in school readiness measured by student pre- and post- evaluations. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 110 El Cerrito High School students Location Description 540 Ashbury Avenue, El Cerrito, CA 94530 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 57 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Planned Activities Provide comprehensive mental health and student support services to 110 students attending El Cerrito High School resulting in improved well-being and an increase in school connectedness measured by student pre- and post-evaluations. 29 Project Name ECHO Housing: Fair Housing Services Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-4 Fair Housing Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $40,000 Description Provide comprehensive fair housing counseling services to approximately 210 Urban County residents. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities The project estimates to serve 210 Urban County clients. Particularly racial and ethnic minorities, seniors, and persons with disabilities. Location Description 301 West 10th Street Antioch, CA 94509 Planned Activities Provide comprehensive fair housing counseling services to approximately 210 Urban County residents. 30 Project Name Contra Costa Health Services: Adult Continuum of Services Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported H-1 Housing & Supportive Services for the Homeless Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $76,300 Description Provide 24-hour shelter/wrap-around services for 150 homeless adults. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 150 homeless men and women from the Urban County Location Description 2047-C Arnold Industrial Drive, Concord DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 58 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Planned Activities Provide 24-hour shelter/wrap-around services for 150 homeless adults. 31 Project Name Contra Costa Crisis Center Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-2 Non-Homeless Special Needs Population Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $18,000 Description Provide information and referrals to 8,200 Urban County residents including homeless persons, abused children, seniors, battered spouses, persons with HIV/AIDS, and the disabled. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 8,200 Urban County residents including homeless persons, abused children, seniors, battered spouses, persons with HIV/AIDS, and those living with disabilities. Location Description Services are provided over the phone. Planned Activities Provide immediate crisis support service as well as information and referrals to 8,200 Urban County residents including homeless persons, abused children, seniors, battered spouses, persons with HIV/AIDS, and the disabled. 32 Project Name Loaves & Fishes of Contra Costa Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported H-1 Housing & Supportive Services for the Homeless Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $15,000 Description Provide emergency food assistance to 500 people, resulting in improved nutrition. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 500 people; clients served are low- to very low-income men, women, and children recently out of work, homeless, unemployed, underemployed or disabled. Location Description 835 Ferry Street, Martinez, CA 94553 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 59 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Planned Activities Provide free buffet-style lunches and groceries weekdays to 500 homeless and low-income Urban County residents at the Loaves & Fishes Martinez Dining Room. 33 Project Name Shelter Inc.: Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing Program Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported H-2 Prevention Services for Homeless Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $25,075 Description Provide homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing services to 180 Urban County residents to quickly regain stable, permanent housing or maintain their current housing. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 180 low-income Urban County residents will benefit. Location Description 1333 Willow Pass Road #206 Concord, CA 94520 Planned Activities Provide homelessness prevention and rapid rehousing services to 180 Urban County residents to quickly regain stable, permanent housing or maintain their current housing. 34 Project Name CocoKids: Road to Success Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-5 Economic Development Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $85,000 Description Provide technical assistance, training, and ongoing support services to low- and moderate-income persons so they can sustain their licensed family day care business or receive a childcare license to open and operate a new licensed family daycare business (microenterprise). Target Date 6/30/2020 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 60 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Approximately 90 low-income microenterprise/small business owners will be assisted with technical assistance by this project. Location Description 1035 Detroit Ave #200, Concord, CA 94518 Planned Activities Provide technical assistance, training, and ongoing support services to low- and moderate-income persons so they can sustain their licensed family day care business or receive a childcare license to open and operate a new licensed family daycare business (microenterprise). 35 Project Name Multicultural Institute: Lifeskills/Day Labor Program Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-5 Economic Development Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $26,000 Description Provide job-matching, individualized assistance with health, legal, educational needs to 300 poverty level and extremely-low income day laborers. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 300 poverty level and extremely-low income Spanish-speaking immigrant workers, primarily day-laborers, who seek full-time work in front of Home Depot or who complement existing low-wage employment with day labor jobs. Day laborers tend to be young, nearly half are under 30 and most are immigrants. The day labor population ranges from new immigrants to people who have been established in the US for many years and are raising families here. Location Description 3600 MacDonald Avenue Richmond, CA 94801 Planned Activities Provide job-matching, individualized assistance with health, legal, educational needs to 300 poverty level and extremely-low income day laborers. 36 Project Name Opportunity Junction: Bay Point Career Development Services Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-5 Economic Development Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 61 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Funding CDBG: $20,000 Description Provide a set of intensive, individualized vocational services including assessment and development of employment plans, case management and service referrals, connections to in-demand vocational training, and one-on-one career skills development to 30 persons. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 30 Urban County residents, primarily in Bay Point Location Description 3105 Willow Pass Road, Bay Point, CA 94565 Planned Activities Provide a set of intensive, individualized vocational services including assessment and development of employment plans, case management and service referrals, connections to in-demand vocational training, and one-on-one career skills development to 30 persons. 37 Project Name Opportunity Junction: Job Training and Placement Program Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-5 Economic Development Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $100,000 Description To provide training and job placement assistance to low-income persons that leads to economic self-sufficiency through careers in the field of information technology. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Approximately 10 low-income persons will be trained and placed in jobs in the field of information technology. Location Description 3102 Delta Fair Blvd. , Antioch, CA 94509 Planned Activities To provide training and job placement assistance to low-income persons that leads to economic self-sufficiency through careers in the field of information technology. 38 Project Name Renaissance Entrepreneurship Center: Renaissance Richmond DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 62 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-5 Economic Development Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $42,000 Description Intensive small business/microenterprise training and technical assistance to 50 unduplicated lower-income individuals who own or wish to start a small business/microenterprise. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 50 existing small business owners or persons wishing to open a business living in Richmond and the Urban County. Renaissance Richmond will support lower-income English- and Spanish-speaking Urban County residents, particularly women and people of color. Location Description 1500 MacDonald Avenue, Richmond, CA 94801 Planned Activities Intensive small business/microenterprise training and technical assistance to 50 unduplicated lower-income individuals who own or wish to start a small business/microenterprise. 39 Project Name West Contra Costa Business Dev. Center, Inc.: Emerging Entrepreneurs Program Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-5 Economic Development Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $77,152 Description To provide technical assistance and support to existing microenterprises/small-businesses or persons wishing to open a microenterprise/small-business as a way to create/retain jobs. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Approximately 50 existing or prospective low-income microenterprise business owners will be assisted. Location Description 812 San Pablo Ave., Ste. 2, Pinole, CA 94564 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 63 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Planned Activities To provide technical assistance and support to existing microenterprises/small-businesses or persons wishing to open a microenterprise/small-business as a way to create/retain jobs. 40 Project Name Workforce Development Board of Contra Costa County: Small Business Development Center Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-5 Economic Development Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $50,000 Description To provide group training, technical assistance, and individualized advising to new or existing microenterprises/small-businesses run by low- to moderate-income clients. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Approximately 33 new or existing microenterprises/small- businesses owners will be assisted. Location Description 300 Ellinwood Drive #300, , Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 Planned Activities To provide group training, technical assistance, and individualized advising to new or existing microenterprises/small-businesses run by low- to moderate-income clients. 41 Project Name City of Oakley - Oakley Senior Center Improvements Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-6 Infrastructure/Public Facilities Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $80,000 Description The rehabilitation of a former fire station building, including roof replacement and HVAC replacement, for use as the City of Oakley's senior center. Target Date 6/30/2020 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 64 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities The project will benefit 200 seniors over the age of 62. Location Description 215 2nd Street, Oakley, CA 94561 Planned Activities The rehabilitation of a former fire station building, including roof replacement and HVAC replacement, for use as the City of Oakley’s senior center. Varioius recreational, educational, social and human service programs will take place in the Senior Center. 42 Project Name City of Richmond - Richmond Recreation Center Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-6 Infrastructure/Public Facilities Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $71,200 Description Replacement of flooring and repainting of the Social Hall in the Richmond Recreation Center. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 1000 Richmond residents. Location Description 3230 Macdonald Ave, Richmond, CA Planned Activities Replacement of flooring and repainting of the Social Hall in the Richmond Recreation Center. 43 Project Name Contra Costa County Public Works Department - Montalvin Park Sports Courts Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-6 Infrastructure/Public Facilities Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $95,000 Description Phase I - Remove existing tennis courts and replace with basketball courts. Target Date 6/30/2020 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 65 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 2,876 residents of Montalvin Manor. Location Description Upper-level of Montalvin Park, Denise Drive, San Pablo Planned Activities Phase 1 will be the improvement of the sports courts at the upper level of the park. This will include space for elementary and high school levels of play. 44 Project Name Greater Richmond Interfaith Program (GRIP) - Homeless Shelter Repairs Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-6 Infrastructure/Public Facilities Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $126,418 Description Rehabilitation of the GRIP homeless shelter, including painting, the installation of security/safety lighting, the repair of flooring and sheet rock, accessibility improvements, and the replacement of bathroom fixtures, doors, and a water heater. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 49,520 persons Location Description 165 – 22nd Street, Richmond, CA 94801 Planned Activities Rehabilitation of the GRIP homeless shelter, including painting, the installation of security/safety lighting, the repair of flooring and sheet rock, accessibility improvements, and the replacement of bathroom fixtures, doors, and a water heater. 45 Project Name Town of Moraga - ADA Restroom and Pathway Upgrades Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-6 Infrastructure/Public Facilities Needs Addressed Non-Housing Community Development Funding CDBG: $79,375 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 66 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Description Accessibility improvements to a community center in order to create an ADA-compliant restroom on the second level of the first floor of the facility, and an ADA-compliant pathway leading from handicapped parking spaces to the South entrance of the facility. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 16,797 Lamorinda residents Location Description Hacienda de las Flores 2100 Donald Drive, Moraga, CA 94556 Planned Activities Accessibility improvements to a community center in order to create an ADA-compliant restroom on the second level of the first floor of the facility, and an ADA-compliant pathway leading from handicapped parking spaces to the South entrance of the facility. 46 Project Name Veteran's Square Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported AH-1 New Construction of Affordable Rental Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Funding HOME: $1,195,000 Description homeless New construction of 30 units of multifamily rental housing affordable to/occupied low income families, veterans and veterans with a disability. The project was funded with FY 2018/19 HOME funds in the amount of $1,195,000 and FY 2019/20 HOME funds in the amount of $1,005,400, for a total of $2,200,400 in HOME funds awarded to the project. Target Date 6/30/2021 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 30 families total, including 14 HOME-assisted units. Location Description 901 Los Medanos Street, Pittsburg DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 67 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Planned Activities New construction of 30 units of multifamily affordable rental housing in Pittsburg. 47 Project Name 1313 Galindo Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported AH-1 New Construction of Affordable Rental Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Funding HOPWA: $200,000 Description To provide 62 units of new transit oriented multifamily rental housing in Concord that is affordable to and occupied by lower income households. Target Date 6/30/2021 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 62 Families, including 13 HOME-assisted and 1 HOPWA-assisted units. Location Description 1313-1321 Galindo Street, Concord Planned Activities To provide 62 units of new transit oriented multifamily rental housing in Concord that is affordable to and occupied by lower income households. 48 Project Name Legacy Court Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported AH-1 New Construction of Affordable Rental Housing AH-4 New Supportive Housing - Special Needs Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Funding HOPWA: $600,000 Description To provide 43 units of new multifamily rental housing in Richmond that is affordable to and occupied by lower income households. Target Date 6/30/2021 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 42 lower-income households, which includes 21 units designed to accomodate special needs populations. Location Description Three separate blocks in the incorporated city portion of North Richmond. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 68 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Planned Activities Construction of 43 units of new affordable multifamily rental housing. 49 Project Name Las Juntas Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported AH-2 Homeownership Opportunities Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Funding HOME: $1,605,000 Description To provide transit-oriended affordable homeownership opportunities for low and moderate income households through the new construction of 42 condominium homes in Walnut Creek. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 42 Families, 11 HOME-assisted units. Location Description 1250 Las Juntas Way, Walnut Creek Planned Activities To provide transit-oriended affordable homeownership opportunities for low and moderate income households through the new construction of 42 condominium homes in Walnut Creek. 50 Project Name CCC/Habitat for Humanity: Neighborhood Preservation Program Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported AH-3 Maintain and Preserve Affordable Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Funding CDBG: $645,000 Description Provision of 5 low-interest loans and 2 grants for the rehabilitation of single-family homes owned and occupied by very-low and low-income households. An additional 10 grants will be allocated to low-income mobile home residents. Habitat for Humanity East Bay/Silicon Valley will be a subrecipient to DCD. Habitat will administer the program, while the Department of Conservation and Development will be responsible for overseeing operations and managing the current loan portfolio. Target Date 6/30/2020 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 69 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 17 low-income households, many of whom are senior and disabled individuals. Location Description Throughout the Urban County with an emphasis on low- mod neighborhoods. Planned Activities Eliminate conditions that may be detrimental to health, life, property and/or public welfare. Renovation includes the elimination of blighting conditions, bringing homes up to code, improving energy efficiency, promoting accessibility, and enhancing older neighborhoods. 51 Project Name VA Housing Emergency Safety Improvements Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported AH-3 Maintain and Preserve Affordable Housing Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Funding CDBG: $30,000 Description Greater Richmond Interfaith Program - GRIPÃ¢Â¿Â¿s 8-unit affordable housing development for homeless VeteranÃ¢Â¿Â¿s will be safe for its residents. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities 8 units of housing for homeless Veterans. Location Description 165 22nd Street, Richmond, CA 94801 Planned Activities Replacement of electrical subpanels and repair of the security gate, hand railings, stairs, second floor balcony, and laundry room security window bars. 52 Project Name ESG19 Contra Costa County Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported H-1 Housing & Supportive Services for the Homeless H-2 Prevention Services for Homeless CD-7 Administration DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 70 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Needs Addressed Homelessness Prevention Non-Housing Community Development Administration Funding ESG: $394,663 Description For FY 2019/20, Contra Costa County will use ESG funds to provide essential services and emergency shelter services to the homeless and to victims of domestic violence, to provide rental assistance to preventhomelessness and to quickly rehouse the homeless, and for program administration. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Persons experiencing homelessness, including those fleeing from domestic violence, and those at risk for becoming homeless. Location Description Various, throughout the Urban County. Planned Activities For FY 2019/20, Contra Costa County will use ESG funds to provide essential services and emergency shelter services to the homeless and to victims of domestic violence, to provide rental assistance to prevent homelessness and to quickly rehouse the homeless, and for program administration. 53 Project Name CDBG Program Administration Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-7 Administration Needs Addressed Administration Funding CDBG: $1,137,607 Description Program Administration of CDBG Program. $917,607 is coming from the 2018/19 allocation amount (20% of the 2018/19 allocation) and $220,000 is coming from anticipated CDBG Program Income (20% of anticipated CDBG program income). Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 71 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Location Description Planned Activities General program administration of the County's CDBG Program. 54 Project Name HOME Program Administration Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-7 Administration Needs Addressed Administration Funding HOME: $367,199 Description Administration of HOME Program Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities N/A. General HOME Program Administration Location Description 30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553 Planned Activities 55 Project Name CDBG Unallocated Funds Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported AH-3 Maintain and Preserve Affordable Housing CD-6 Infrastructure/Public Facilities Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Funding CDBG: $729,000 Description CDBG funds available for affordable housing and/or Infrastructure/Public Facilities projects that may be identified during the program year. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities To be determined Location Description To be determined Planned Activities To be determined 56 Project Name HOPWA - Permanent Housing (unallocated) DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 72 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported AH-4 New Supportive Housing - Special Needs Needs Addressed Affordable Housing Funding HOPWA: $190,500 Description HOPWA - permanent housing. Specific project(s) to be identified during the program year. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities To be determined Location Description To be determined Planned Activities New Construction or rehabilitation of multi-family housing for persons with HIV/AIDS. 57 Project Name HOPWA Administration Target Area Contra Costa County Goals Supported CD-7 Administration Needs Addressed Administration Funding HOPWA: $59,500 Description General administration of HOPWA projects/activities. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities N/A Location Description 30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553 Planned Activities General administration of HOPWA projects/activities. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 73 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-50 Geographic Distribution - 91.420, 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low -income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed The County's CDBG entitlement area is the entire area of the County except for the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. The County administers the HOME Program for the Contra Costa HOME Consortium, which includes the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. The Contra Costa HOME Consortium entitlement area is the entire County. The County also administers the Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Program. The County's ESG entitlement area is the entire area of the County, except for the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg and Walnut Creek. Contra Costa County is also a sub-grantee to the City of Oakland (Alameda County) for the Housing Opportunities for Persons with HIV/AIDs (HOPWA) program. The County's HOPWA entitlement area is the entire County. Low-income census tracts can be found throughout the County; however, many communities in west and east Contra Costa County, such as Richmond, San Pablo, North Richmond, Montalvin Manor, Tara Hills, Bay View, and Bay Point all have a concentration of minority populations (more than 78.3% of the population) that are also in low/mod-income census tracts. Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of Funds Contra Costa County 100 Table 6 - Geographic Distribution DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 74 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically Though projects may serve the entire Urban County, as is the case with many Public Service projects, it is the intent of the program to target services to areas with the highest need. This includes revitalization strategy areas or census tracts that meets “area benefit” criteria (an area, typically a census tract or a contiguous group of census tracts, where at least 51 percent of the population is low/mod-income). In all cases, Subrecipients must demonstrate that they will be able to serve a minimum of 51 percent very- low and low-income persons or households. However, it has been the County’s practice to fund projects that serve a minimum of 75 percent extremely low, very low- and low-income persons or households. Furthermore, established policy gives priority to housing projects that provide units affordable to and occupied by households with extremely low-income. These policies and practices have ensured that projects/programs serve those areas with the highest need. Housing activities to meet Consolidated Plan priorities include new construction, rehabilitation, and preservation of existing affordable housing. These housing projects have the potential to either assist in neighborhood revitalization or provide de-concentration of low-income and/or minority populations by location in areas with little supply of affordable housing. Discussion Given the size of the entitlement areas of the CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA Programs for the County, Contra Costa County's CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds are awarded to projects and programs on a competitive allocation basis. The projects/programs, as in the case of many Public Service projects, typically serve more than just one specific area or neighborhood of the County; however, it is the intent of the programs to target services to areas with highest need, such as a revitalization strategy areas or a census tract that has a high percentage of low/mod-income households. The highest numbers of low income and minority households are in west Contra Costa County, followed by east Contra Costa County and central Contra Costa County (see Appendix C and Appendix G of the FY 2015-2020 Consolidated Plan). All projects funded with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA funds are targeted to low income households throughout the County. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 75 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Affordable Housing AP-55 Affordable Housing - 91.420, 91.220(g) Introduction The numbers served in the tables below represent the projects funded in the first year of the Consolidated Plan and are the one-year goals for each subsequent year of the Consolidated Plan to meet affordable housing goals and strategies. One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless 0 Non-Homeless 0 Special-Needs 14 Total 14 Table 7 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through Rental Assistance 0 The Production of New Units 164 Rehab of Existing Units 25 Acquisition of Existing Units 0 Total 189 Table 8 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type Discussion DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 76 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-60 Public Housing - 91.420, 91.220(h) Introduction The Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa (HACCC) provides 1,125 public housing units in 13 developments scattered throughout 9 communities in the County. HACCC also provides approximately 9,101 Housing Choice vouchers, 332 Shelter Plus Care certificates, nearly 266 Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (VASH) vouchers and 250 tax credit units. HACCC has project-based 833 of its vouchers to help fund construction of new, long-term affordable housing in the County. Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing HACCC has begun a long-term project to reposition and rehabilitate its public housing porfolio in the face of ever-decreasing federal, state and local funding. The planning portion of this process is expected to be completed this year and implementation has actually begun on portions of the plan. As part of this process HACCC has been approved for four Rental Assistance Demonstation (RAD) program conversions that will remove 214 long-term vacant units at Las Deltas in North Richmond. These units will be removed from the public housing portfolio and converted to project-based voucher assistance that will be used to help fund construction or rehabilitation of more affordable housing units. HACC anticipates utilizing approximately $3.0 million of HUD funding for a variety of modernization improvements at all of its public housing developments. Specific improvements include:  $1,183,000 for demolition of Las Deltas CA006/9A public housing site in North Richmond.  $1,131,000 for relocation costs during the RAD dispostion of Las Deltas in North Richmond.  $245,000 for unscheduled and emergency unit modernization and site improvements at various properties.  $136,000 for non-routine maintenance repairs (ordinary maintenance items such as window and flooring replacement, or electrical repair where the scale of damage is beyond the scope of day-to-day maintenance) at various properties.  $134,000 for construction and rehabilitaton of on-site management offices at various properties.  $63,000 for new appliances at various properties. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership HACCC actively encourages all Public Housing residents to get involved in the community in which they are living. Quarterly town hall meetings are organized at each proeprty in an effort, among other goals, to develop resident leaders and solicit participation in resident service programs. HACCC believes that it DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 77 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) is important to provide residents with conduits to service providers, in every community, that can provide families with the opportunity to pursue employment, job training and other education that will lead them toward self-sufficiency. The ultimate goal is to transition households from welfare to work, and achieve greater independence. HACCC has active resident services at four of the thirteen Public Housing Developments located in Contra Costa County. The resident services program provides offfice and meeting facilities for work participants, childcare or after school programs for children of working parents, equipment and materials as funding allows, and technical assistance from non-profit or governmental agencies as needed. If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance Not applicable. The Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa is not designated as troubled. Discussion DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 78 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities - 91.420, 91.220(i) Introduction During FY 2019/20, the County will continue its efforts to maintain the availability of housing and services for the homeless in Contra Costa. Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds may be used for five program components related to homelessness: street outreach, emergency shelter, homelessness prevention, rapid re-housing assistance and data collection. The County is allocating ESG funds for FY 2019/20 to emergency shelter services, including youth and domestic violence providers, homeless street outreach services, homelessness prevention to assist low-income residents at risk of becoming homeless, and rapid re- housing to assist homeless residents quickly regain housing stability. CDBG funds are also targeted to support public service activities that offer a variety of services to the homeless and those at-risk of becoming homeless, as well as to special needs populations. In FY 2019/20, funds will be allocated for operating expenses of an emergency shelter for single adults as well as to programs that provide a homeless hotline, housing counseling and legal services, and food distribution. Support services such as client advocacy, job skills training, independent living skills training, respite care, counseling and case management, and nutrition education will be provided to the frail elderly, disabled, and the visually impaired. ESG funds will be allocated for adult and youth homeless shelters, emergency shelter for victims of domestic violence, homeless street outreach services, homeless support services and homeless prevention and rapid rehousing activities, including case management and direct financial assistance. These services are available throughout the County. During FY 2019/20, the County will continue to work with the County's Council on Homelessness and the County's CoC to implement key strategies identified in the five-year CoC Plan and the Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness. The County’s Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness includes priorities to address three types of homeless populations: the chronically homeless, those discharged into homelessness, and the transitionally (or episodic) homeless people. This will include programs and projects to increase income and employment opportunities for homeless households, expand needed support services and programs to prevent homelessness, and increase the availability of housing affordable to extremely-low income households and homeless persons. Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs Many of the Contra Costa Consortium jurisdictions are providing CDBG funds for homeless outreach teams through the Contra Costa County Health Services Coordinated Outreach, Referral, and DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 79 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Engagement (CORE) Homeless Street Outreach Program. The focus of the CORE Homeless Street Outreach Program is to target high-risk, hard-to-reach chronically homeless individuals, transition-aged youth, and families living outside whom typically do not access services or do not know how to access services. CORE uses a client-centered, “whatever it takes” approach to build rapport and engage consumers into services that aim to get them off the streets and stabilized. CORE Outreach teams consist of two outreach workers, two outreach team leads, and an Outreach Coordinator. Outreach staff are trained in core principles and practices of trauma informed care, motivational interviewing, and espouse a “housing first” philosophy. The various CORE teams operate over an 18-hour period during the day and evening. Two or three- person outreach teams go out in a systematic pattern within an established service area (East, Central, and West County) to contact chronically homeless individuals living on the streets, provide face-to-face outreach and engagement, and information necessary to address behavior contributing to their homelessness. All CORE teams work closely with law enforcement and other local entities, providing intervention services to advise the homeless of available options and to help them avoid incarceration. Contra Costa 211: CDBG funds are also distributed to the Contra Costa Crisis Center for the 211 line (see the County's Project summary in AP-38 for more information). The line provides a single point of contact for homeless individuals seeking services throughout the County. Phone counselors complete an intake assessment to determine the needs of each caller then provide referrals to a variety of community programs including shelter, food pantries and mental health services. Contra Costa Crisis Center has been participating in the Coordinated Intake and Assessment subcommittee and will be a key partner in piloting and implementation. Health Care for the Homeless: In addition to providing direct medical care, testing and immunization services, the County-funded Health Care for the Homeless Program uses its mobile healthcare van for outreach. The bilingual Healthcare for the Homeless Team assesses client’s needs, provides social support, and links clients to appropriate services and programs, including mental health and substance abuse programs, Medi-Cal, the County's Basic Adult Care program, and the Covered California healthcare insurance exchange. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons Emergency Shelter Funding: Of the funds received by the County for FY 2019/20, $211,000 (ESG) and $76,300 (CDBG) are allocated to local emergency shelters to provide shelter and case management services to homeless adults, families and youth, and to victims of domestic violence and their children. Upon entry to one of the shelters, each resident or family is assigned a case manager to assist the individual in determining an appropriate service plan that will help them regain housing as soon as possible. The shelters are part of the County’s Continuum of Care and enable individuals and families the opportunity to work on stabilizing their lives and moving toward a permanent housing solution. The cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek are also providing CDBG funds to local DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 80 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) emergency shelters. Transitional Housing Development: In October, 2011, under the working name “Synergy House” and using both CDBG and State funds, the County began to rehabilitate an existing vacant residential building in Martinez and convert it to a sober living transitional housing program for homeless single men completing substance abuse treatment programs. The new facility is directly adjacent to a recently constructed treatment facility, Discovery House. The facility opened in August 2013 and was newly designated as “Uilkema House”. The Uilkema House program added 12 new beds to the homeless continuum of care and allows Contra Costa homeless, single men completing treatment programs such as Discovery House to transition back into the community with the skills and resources necessary to maintain their sobriety. CARE Centers/Multi-Service Centers: There are three multi-service centers, or Coordinated Assessment Referral and Engagement (CARE) Centers, located in specific regions of the County. The CARE Centers are drop in centers designed to offer basic survival needs as well as case management, life skills, referral and linkage, housing search assistance, employment assistance, assistance accessing healthcare and mainstream resources, alcohol and other drug counseling and treatment, and crisis intervention. The centers serve as a place of respite from the larger community and provide a sense of belonging and connection to those within the homeless community. The CARE Centers also serves families who are experiencing homelessness, educating them about their rights to services that enable their children to continue their education and connecting them to a variety of services focused on serving families. One of the CARE Centers primarily specializes in serving families and seniors. Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again Transitional Housing Development: The Uilkema House facility opened in August 2013 and added 12 new beds to the homeless continuum of care and allows Contra Costa homeless, single men completing treatment programs such as Discovery House to transition back into the community with the skills and resources necessary to maintain their sobriety. Veterans: In cooperation with the local Veterans Administration office, Contra Costa's CoC continues to work to increase its capacity to house and serve homeless veterans, including the distribution of HUD- VASH vouchers and rental assistance for permanent housing units provided to homeless veterans and their families under the Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) program. Shortening Period of Time Homeless: The County will continue to pursue increasing the capacity of its DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 81 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Rapid Rehousing program. For FY 2019/20, $153,343 ($128,268 in ESG and $25,075 in CDBG funds) is allocated to provide rapid rehousing and homeless prevention services to individuals and families experiencing homelessness or at risk of becoming homeless. Rapid rehousing provides housing relocation/stabilization services and financial assistance in paying deposits, rent and utility bills to help homeless individuals and families quickly regain and maintain housing and self-sufficiency. In order to reach those most in need, outreach includes health-care and mental health facilities, foster care and other youth programs, veteran’s services and social services agencies, and churches and other religious organizations. Reducing Recidivism: The Contra Costa County's Health Services Department has integrated the County's Mental Health, Alcohol and Other Drug Services and Homeless Programs into a single Behavioral Health Division to continue addressing the mental health and substance abuse issues that are common barriers to long-term housing success for homeless individuals and families. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs. Foster Care: When foster youth age out of the foster care system, the County links them to the Independent Living Skills Program (ILSP). ILSP includes workshops that prepare youth for emancipation (money management, education, computer skills, home management, and social skills), employment assistance, non-McKinney-Vento housing and retention services, and an individualized transition plan out of foster care. In addition, foster youth can elect to remain in foster care or return to care after emancipation (but before turning 21) to receive a two-year housing subsidy, which can be used in a market rate unit, student housing, or congregate living. This is a State program that all foster youth and former foster youth are able to access. Health Care: Hospital discharge protocol, adopted by the CoC and by all hospitals in the County, states: 1) Hospitals will not discharge people who are not ambulatory or not capable of caring for themselves; 2) prior to discharge, the hospital will seek a pre-discharge assessment from a Healthcare for the Homeless (HCH) nurse; 3) the HCH nurse will assess the viability of a respite placement and make a recommendation accordingly; 4) prior to discharge, the hospital will ensure that a patient has an appointment for follow-up medical care; 5) the hospital will discharge the patient with enough medications and/or supplies for at least 7 days; and 6) the hospital will ensure that the patient leaves with all of their belongings and is appropriately clothed. Mental Health: Clients treated by the County Behavioral Health Division are regularly reviewed for readiness and prepared for discharge into environments that provide stepped-down levels of care. The DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 82 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Department holds a weekly Bed Committee where all institutionalized consumer’s discharge plans are prepared. Discharge planning responsibilities fall to the Clinic managers for those consumers currently receiving services and to the Mental Health Transition Team (consisting of managers, a psychiatrist, RNs, clinicians and peer providers) for those patients not otherwise connected to the County system. State hospitals discharge to Institutes for Mental Disease (IMD)/Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF) and not to HUD CoC funded programs. Persons discharged from IMDs/SNFs are placed in Crisis Residential/Transitional Residential Services (CR/TRS), and those discharged from Acute Inpatient Facilities (AIFs) are released to appropriate settings, such as the Respite Center at the County’s Adult Emergency Shelter. Those exiting CR/TRS are discharged to independent, shared or supported (e.g. Board & Care) housing. State Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) funds also pay for 79 housing units for homeless discharges with severe mental illness. AB 109: In 2012, CCICH (now called the Council on Homelessness) helped develop and implement two discharge plans for former inmates - the County Reentry Strategic Plan and the Public Safety "Realignment Plan." The Reentry Strategic Plan focuses on: 1) housing-focused discharge planning prior to release; 2) formalized pre-release planning that identifies service needs & connects prisoners with community-based service providers; and 3) enrollment in public benefits at least 90 days prior to release. The Realignment Plan, under which low-level offenders in State prisons are transferred to County custody, provides: 1) pre-release "reach-in" assessments, case management and referrals to housing resources, and 2) individualized treatment plans for mental health/substance abuse issues, linked with housing services. CCICH also coordinates with the Parole and Community Team (PACT), comprised of service providers, police & the California Department of Corrections Regional Parole Board, to link newly released ex-offenders with resources like housing, education, employment, job training, substance abuse treatment & childcare. Discussion A major factor contributing to problems of the homeless and special needs populations in the County is the lack of housing affordable to extremely-low and very-low income households as well as an inadequate supply of accessible housing. The County’s strategies to maintain and increase the supply of affordable housing are equally relevant as strategies to alleviate problems of these populations. As further recognition of the housing needs of homeless and at-risk populations, in FY 1998/99, the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors adopted a policy to encourage the inclusion of units affordable to extremely- low income households in projects funded with CDBG and HOME funds. In addition, a minimum of five percent of all new housing built with County funds must be accessible to mobility-impaired households and an additional two-percent must be accessible to hearing/vision impaired. Wherever feasible, the County also requires the inclusion of accessible units in housing rehabilitation projects. Strategies to improve housing affordability through direct payment assistance are also effective in preventing and alleviating homelessness among lower-income and special needs households. Therefore, the County will continue to pursue additional Section 8 vouchers, FEMA funds, Shelter Plus Care and DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 83 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) other resources to assist the currently homeless and at-risk population in obtaining and maintaining permanent housing. In addition to strategies to increase the affordable housing supply using CDBG, HOME, and HOPWA resources, the County Health Services Department will apply for HEARTH Act funds to maintain and expand programs and projects to serve the homeless, including families with children, youth leaving foster care, victims of domestic violence, and individuals with problems of substance abuse and mental illness. Potential projects include rental assistance for homeless individuals and families, continued operating support for permanent and transitional housing projects and multi-service centers, the potential development of additional permanent housing with support services for families, and a variety of support services (e.g., outreach, case management, education/job training, health services, counseling/parent education, substance abuse treatment and money management). DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 84 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing -91.420, 91.220(j) Introduction There are many common barriers to affordable housing throughout the County, including a lack of adequate funds to preserve existing affordable housing and expand the supply of affordable housing. In addition, each community in the County has its own planning and zoning codes, which directly and indirectly affect the cost of developing housing. The following is a representative example of actions taken by local jurisdictions to mitigate the effects of public policy that may serve as barriers to affordable housing. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment The County will continue its efforts to remove or ameliorate public policies which negatively impact affordable housing development in the County including the following:  Consistent with the General Plan, the County will initiate zoning changes for residential and designated agricultural sites from current zoning designations to Planned Unit Development.  Through the Density Bonus Ordinance, the County is required to grant one density bonus and incentives or concessions when an applicant for a housing development seeks and agrees to construct a housing development, excluding any units permitted by the density bonus that will contain at least one of the following: ten percent of the for lower income households; five percent of the total units for very low income households; a senior citizen housing development, or a mobile home park that limits residency based on age requirements for housing older persons; or ten percent of the total dwelling units in a common interest development for persons and families of moderate income, provided that all units in the development are offered to the public for purchase.  The Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requires all developers of five or more units to provide 15 percent of the units at affordable costs to moderate, low or very-low income households depending on the type of project. Developers may pay a fee in lieu of providing the affordable units.  The County will review and develop new regulations to permit the development of agriculturally related structures on agriculturally zoned land without a use permit in order to encourage the provision of onsite farmworker housing. Discussion DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 85 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) AP-85 Other Actions - 91.420, 91.220(k) Introduction This section discusses the County's Department of Conservation and Development's efforts in addressing underserved needs, developing the institutional structure for delivering housing and community development activities, and expanding and preserving affordable housing opportunities within the Urban County and HOME Consortium areas. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The following are obstacles to meeting needs of the underserved:  Accessibility of services  Awareness of services  Coordination of services  Resources appropriate to the level of need Accessibility of Services: Lack of accessibility to services can be the result of lack of transportation for those in need, services that are not delivered in a culturally appropriate manner or in the appropriate language, burdensome prerequisites to accessing services (“red tape”), and services that are not provided in proximity to those in need. Lack of transportation is a particular challenge for those who do not drive, do not have a car, or are elderly and for persons with disabilities. Most if not all of the public service projects listed in AP-38 provide are located within the neighborhoods or communities of the target population to provide easy accessibility to their services. Some of the public service projects serving the elderly or persons with disabilities provide transportation to their services or provide "in-home" services. Awareness of Services: The lack of awareness of the availability of services by those in need and a lack of knowledge about how to access services are significant obstacles to the provision of services. All agencies receiving CDBG, HOME, ESG, or HOPWA funds from the County must provide significant outreach to those in need. County DCD staff will continue to monitor CDBG/HOME/ESG/HOPWA funded agencies to verify if an agency's outreach is adequate and that outreach materials are available in various languages. Coordination of Services: Those in need must often access services from several points; similar services may also be provided by more than one agency. Those being served by one agency may have needs that are not being addressed by the particular agency currently serving that person or family. County DCD staff advocates for CDBG/HOME/ESG/HOPWA funded agencies to collaborate and coordinate with other agencies in the community for serving their target population. DCD staff will continue to encourage agencies to collaborate and coordinate to avoid duplication of service and to provide more efficient services to their clients or target populations. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 86 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Resources: Resources are generally less than required to meet the level of need. The CDBG/HOME/ESG/HOPWA funds that are available are prioritized to the high Priority Needs and Goals established in the 2015-2020 Consolidated Plan. Funding is also prioritized to those undertakings that represent the most efficient use of funds, are delivered by the most qualified persons, and serve the broadest geography. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing The County uses 45 percent of its CDBG funding to support affordable housing preservation activities. For over 40 years, the Neighborhood Preservation Program has been providing low interest loans and grants to low-income homeowners for rehabilitation, and accessibility and energy efficiency improvements. This program improves living conditions for the recipients, and helps maintain viable neighborhoods. In addition to CDBG funds, HOME funds are available and utilized in coordination with the County's CDBG funds to support the development of affordable housing. CDBG funds are also used to support acquisition and rehabilitation of existing affordable apartments as well as the conversion of market rate housing to affordable housing. HOME funds are used for new construction, acquisition and rehabilitation, and preservation of existing affordable housing. These funds leverage State, local, and private funds. Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards The County will continue to protect young children from lead-based paint hazards in housing funded with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA resources through the implementation of 24 CFR Part 35. The purpose of this regulation is to reduce or eliminate lead-based paint hazards in federally owned housing and housing receiving federal funds. All developers enter into legal agreements that include requirements for compliance with the lead-based paint regulation. The Neighborhood Preservation Program has developed a program-specific lead-hazard reduction implementation plan. All other projects will develop plans appropriate to the project type and level of funding received. Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families The County, and cities within it, employ a variety of strategies to help alleviate poverty, including efforts to stimulate economic growth and job opportunities, and to provide County residents with the skills and abilities required to take advantage of those opportunities. This also includes implementation of Section 3 strategies to ensure employment and contracting opportunities for low and very low-income persons or businesses residing within the community where a HUD-funded project is located. The County and a majority of cities actively work to attract and retain businesses. Many are involved in revitalization efforts for their downtown areas utilizing a variety of strategies such as infrastructure and façade improvement programs, the State Main Street Program, and the preparation of revitalization plans to guide future development. The County, through its various departments, provides services and supports DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 87 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) programs that promote personal responsibility, independence and self-sufficiency. One of the responsibilities of the County’s Department of Conservation & Development (DCD) is the management of the CDBG, HOME, ESG and HOPWA programs. Many CDBG and HOME funded programs are geared toward helping lower-income persons find and maintain stable housing, receive training for jobs that provide a livable wage, and access support services that are needed to attain self-sufficiency. By Board guidelines, 10 percent of the annual grant amount is set aside for economic development activities. Programs funded under the Economic Development category are intended to assist businesses with expanding economic opportunities for lower-income persons and to increase the viability of neighborhood commercial areas. As recorded in the list of projects of this Action Plan, job training and placement projects have been approved for funding. In addition to economic development activities, the County works with other jurisdictions and local non-profits to provide emergency and transitional housing, and support services necessary to assist the homeless in achieving economic independence. The County's Employment and Human Services Department (EHSD) is responsible for providing services to adults, children, families, and the elderly. Bureaus within EHSD that directly relate to the reduction of poverty include the Workforce Services, Children and Family Services, and the Workforce Development bureaus. Other programs administered by EHSD, that indirectly support economic self-sufficiency and are intended to provide assistance to families and persons to lead productive lives include, but are not limited to: 1) the Family Preservation Program, which emphasizes keeping families together in a safe, nurturing environment and providing them with skills that will last when they leave the program; and 2) Service Integration Teams that provide services to increase the economic self-sufficiency of families, improve family functioning, and expand community capacity to support children and families. The Workforce Development Board (WDB) of Contra Costa is a public policy body appointed by the County Board of Supervisors to oversee the strategic planning and policy development of the County’s workforce development system. The Board is composed of business, labor, economic development, public agencies, education, and community-based organizations. The Board has also designated the WDB as the oversight body for the County’s CalWORKS policy to ensure full integration of the area’s workforce development system. The WDB has responsibility to oversee the provision of workforce services through its four One-Stop Business and Career Centers, and Affiliate Sites throughout the County. Actions planned to develop institutional structure During FY 2019/20, the County will continue to work with the cities and other public and private agencies and organizations to implement strategies designed to accomplish the affordable housing and community development objectives identified in the FY 2015-2020 Consolidated Plan. Specific actions to be undertaken by the County include the provision of resources and technical assistance to public agencies and the non-profit and for-profit community in developing, financing and implementing programs and projects consistent with the County’s annual and five-year plans. In addition, the County DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 88 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) will work with the cities and other agencies to establish an informal cooperative network to share resources and facilitate development in the Urban County and Consortium area. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies The County’s efforts to coordinate activities and strategies for affordable housing development and the provision of emergency and transitional housing and supportive services include cooperative planning efforts as well as participation in a number of countywide housing and service provider organizations. Planning efforts to be undertaken during the current program year include the following: Contra Costa Consortium members continue to work on strategies and actions designed to overcome identified impediments and eliminate problems of housing discrimination in Contra Costa. The Continuum of Care and the Council on Homelessness works with Contra Costa jurisdictions, public and private agencies, the interfaith community, homeless advocacy groups and other community organizations to implement the Continuum of Care Plan, which includes strategies and programs designed to alleviate homelessness, and the Ten Year Plan to End Homelessness. In addition to the above, the County participates in a number of countywide housing and service provider organizations, which are intended to share resources and coordinate strategies and programs for affordable housing and community development activities. These organizations include the Association of Homeless and Housing Service Providers, the Tri-Valley Affordable Housing Subcommittee, the Contra Costa HIV/AIDS Consortium, the Children and Families Policy Forum, Non- Profit Housing Association, and the Workforce Development Board. Discussion DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 89 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Program Specific Requirements AP-90 Program Specific Requirements - 91.420, 91.220(l)(1,2,4) Introduction Program Income: The County estimates receiving $1.1 million in CDBG program income and estimates receiving $350,000 in HOME program income during FY 2018/19. Other: The County does not have any float-funded activities, Section 108 loan guarantees, or surplus urban renewal settlement funds. The County does not have any Urgent Need activities. Benefit to low- and moderate-income persons: All of the County's FY 2019/20 CDBG funds that do not go towards Program Administration are allocated to activities that will benefit persons of low- and moderate income. The County anticipates utilizing 20 percent of all CDBG Program funds towards CDBG Program Administration. Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 1,100,000 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's strategic plan. 0 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0 5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0 Total Program Income: 1,100,000 Other CDBG Requirements 1. The amount of urgent need activities 0 DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 90 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income.Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. 80.00% HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(2) 1. A description of other forms of investment being used beyond those identified in Section 92.205 is as follows: The Contra Costa HOME Consortium does not provide HOME funds in any form not identified in Section 92.205. HOME funds are typically provided as low interest deferred residual receipt loans (multi-family housing), deferred shared appreciation loans (single-family housing), and small grants (specific project related program delivery). 2. A description of the guidelines that will be used for resale or recapture of HOME funds when used for homebuyer activities as required in 92.254, is as follows: The HOME Consortium uses recapture provisions to ensure that all or a portion of the HOME funds are repaid to the Consortium when the home is sold, transferred, or otherwise not occupied by an eligible owner. Recapture Provisions The amount repaid to the HOME program is the original principal of the HOME loan plus a share of the appreciation. The appreciation is the difference between the original purchase price of the home and the current sales price. The current sales price will either be the fair market value, or if the home is subject to a resale restriction, the restricted sales price. The appreciation amount does not include any permanent fixed improvements, but may be adjusted downward by the value of deferred maintenance, not including expected wear and tear. The HOME program share of the appreciation is equal to the share of the HOME loan of the original purchase price. For example, if the purchase price was $400,000, the HOME loan was $20,000 (five percent of the purchase price), and the future sales price is $500,000 then the amount repaid (not considering the adjustments for improvements or deferred maintenance) will be $20,000 plus five percent of the $100,000 appreciation ($5,000) for a total repayment of $25,000. If the home has decreased in value because of market conditions, the HOME Consortium will share in the depreciation of the home. The amount of depreciation of the HOME loan is the percentage of the HOME loan to the original purchase price of the home. Using the same assumptions as in the preceding paragraph, if the future sales price of the home is $350,000, the amount due would be DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 91 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) $20,000 minus five percent of the depreciation ($2,500) for a total repayment of $17,500. If the depreciation of the home is so significant that the outstanding debt on the home exceeds the value of the home, the Consortium will negotiate with the other lenders to accept a lower repayment. This will enable for all debt to be paid through the proceeds of the home sale. The Home Consortium does not allow subsequent buyers to assume an existing loan, but may make the repaid funds available to a subsequent buyer as a new loan. Resale Restrictions The HOME Consortium does not use resale restrictions. However, there may be HOME loans provided to buyers who also have resale restrictions. The resale restrictions may be required by a developer such as Habitat for Humanity, or may be required by another program such as Inclusionary Housing or Density Bonus. In those cases, the HOME loan will meet the recapture provisions described above. The HOME loan will be repaid, and may be available to the next purchaser of the home. The appreciation amount will be based on the maximum resale value as determined by the resale restriction if that value is below the fair market value. For example, if the original purchase price was $400,000, the market value is $500,000 and the resale restricted price is $450,000, the HOME appreciation share will be calculated on $450,000. The resale restrictions will provide for a fair return on investment by calculating the future price based on the change of area median income. This factor is used to ensure the future price will still be affordable to the original target purchaser (typically low income). This price will be adjusted based on the value of capital improvements and deferred maintenance. 3. A description of the guidelines for resale or recapture that ensures the affordability of units acquired with HOME funds? See 24 CFR 92.254(a)(4) are as follows: HOME funds used for homebuyer activities are provided to purchasers of newly constructed or rehabilitated homes. The HOME Consortium uses recapture provisions to ensure that all or a portion of the HOME funds are repaid to the HOME Consortium when the home is sold, transferred, or otherwise not occupied by an eligible owner. Recapture Provisions The amount repaid to the HOME program is the original principal of the HOME loan plus a share of the appreciation. The appreciation is the difference between the original purchase price of the home and the current sales price. The current sales price will either be the fair market value, or if the home is subject to a resale restriction, the restricted sales price. The appreciation amount does not include any permanent fixed improvements, but may be adjusted downward by the value of deferred maintenance, not including expected wear and tear. The HOME program share of the appreciation is equal to the share of the HOME loan of the original purchase price. For example, if DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 92 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) the purchase price was $400,000, the HOME loan was $20,000 (five percent of the purchase price), and the future sales price is $500,000 then the amount repaid (not considering the adjustments for improvements or deferred maintenance) will be $20,000 plus five percent of the $100,000 appreciation ($5,000) for a total repayment of $25,000. If the home has decreased in value because of market conditions, the HOME Consortium will share in the depreciation of the home. The amount of depreciation of the HOME loan is the percentage of the HOME loan to the original purchase price of the home. Using the same assumptions as in the preceding paragraph, if the future sales price of the home is $350,000, the amount due would be $20,000 minus five percent of the depreciation ($2,500) for a total repayment of $17,500. If the depreciation of the home is so significant that the outstanding debt on the home exceeds the value of the home, the Consortium will negotiate with the other lenders to accept a lower repayment. This will enable for all debt to be paid through the proceeds of the home sale. The HOME Consortium does not allow subsequent buyers to assume an existing loan, but may make the repaid funds available to a subsequent buyer as a new loan. Resale Restrictions The HOME Consortium does not use resale restrictions. However, there may be HOME loans provided to buyers who also have resale restrictions. The resale restrictions may be required by a developer such as Habitat for Humanity, or may be required by another program such as Inclusionary Housing or Density Bonus. In those cases, the HOME loan will meet the recapture provisions described above. The HOME loan will be repaid, and may be available to the next purchaser of the home. The appreciation amount will be based on the maximum resale value as determined by the resale restriction if that value is below the fair market value. For example, if the original purchase price was $400,000, the market value is $500,000 and the resale restricted price is $450,000, the HOME appreciation share will be calculated on $450,000. The resale restrictions will provide for a fair return on investment by calculating the future price based on the change of area median income. This factor is used to ensure the future price will still be affordable to the original target purchaser (typically low income). This price will be adjusted based on the value of capital improvements and deferred maintenance. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 93 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 4. Plans for using HOME funds to refinance existing debt secured by multifamily housing that is rehabilitated with HOME funds along with a description of the refinancing guidelines required that will be used under 24 CFR 92.206(b), are as follows: The HOME Consortium is not currently using HOME funds to refinance existing debt. Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) 1. Include written standards for providing ESG assistance (may include as attachment) Written standards for providing ESG assistance have been identified in accordance with 24 CFR 576.400(e)(1) and (e)(3). The following standards will be used to help homeless persons and families and those at risk of homelessness, especially unaccompanied youth and veterans, obtain or maintain permanent housing: A. Eligibility Requirements Participation in Homeless Prevention/Rapid Rehousing requires that program participants meet the following: 1. Meet the HUD definition of homelessness or at risk of homelessness, as amended by the HEARTH Act; 2. No appropriate alternative housing option; 3. Does not have an annual income that exceeds 30% of the median family income; 4. Lacks sufficient resources and support networks necessary to secure or maintain housing without ESG assistance; 5. Agree to meet with a case manager for stabilization/relocation services. 6. Provide verification of homelessness or imminent loss of housing. B. Provider Coordination Recipients of ESG funds will coordinate with other service providers throughout the County by the following means: 1. Through participation in the County's Council on Homelessness, which is charged with providing a forum for communication and coordination among providers; and 2. By participating in the Coordinated Entry System and by maintaining direct relationships and referral agreements with other service providers. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 94 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) C. Determination of Services Rapid Rehousing: Eligible clients must meet HUD definition of homelessness; priority will be given to unaccompanied youth and veterans and to those individuals/families that can provide documentation of reasonable ability to maintain housing when the ESG subsidy ends. Homeless Prevention: Eligible clients must meet HUD definition of at risk of homelessness; priority will be given to unaccompanied youth and veterans and to those individuals/families that can provide documentation of reasonable ability to maintain housing when the ESG subsidy ends. D. Determination of Financial Assistance Eligible clients will complete both a current and a projected budget with a case manager. The case manager will help to identify the amount of the deficit in obtaining and maintaining housing and help develop a basic outline of what steps are necessary to reach a sustainable income or expense reduction that will allow the household to achieve stability in housing. The plan will be reviewed to determine whether it is within the framework of available assistance. The client will receive the minimum assistance required to obtain/maintain housing. E. Length of Assistance Due to the limited funds available for Homeless Prevention and Rapid Rehousing services, clients typically will receive short-term rental assistance of three months or less. Clients will meet with a case manager monthly who will review income documentation. Any increase in income will result in a matching decrease in the amount of rental assistance provided. F. Stabilization/Relocation Services All clients will receive case management and stabilization/relocation services. These services may include counseling; developing, securing and coordinating services; monitoring and evaluating program participant progress; assuring that program participant’s rights are protected; or developing an individualized housing and service plan, including a path to permanent housing stability. 2. If the Continuum of Care has established centralized or coordinated assessment system that meets HUD requirements, describe that centralized or coordinated assessment system. The Contra Costa Coordinated Entry system is a collaboration of multiple community, government, and faith-based agencies that, collectively, provide services that range from prevention of homelessness to permanent housing placements. Consumers are linked to supports needed to obtain and sustain housing. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 95 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) A. Eligibility Our Coordinated Entry system is designed to serve anyone in Contra Costa County who is experiencing a housing crisis. This includes those who are:  Unsheltered (e.g., living outside, in a car, on the streets, or in an encampment),  Sheltered (e.g., in emergency shelter or transitional housing), or  At imminent risk of homelessness (e.g., being evicted, unable to pay rent, doubled up, or in an unsafe living situation). B. Access Consumers connect to services through one of three portals:  CALL: The 2-1-1 information line, operated by the Contra Costa Crisis Center, provides a phone portal for individuals and families needing to connect to homeless services.  CARE Centers: Coordinated Assessment and Resource (CARE) Centers provide a walk-in option for individuals and families who need to connect to homeless services. Services offered include help with basic needs, light case management, housing navigation services and substance use disorder treatment and support.  CORE Outreach: Coordinated Outreach Referral and Engagement (CORE) outreach teams engage homeless individuals living outside, help facilitate and/or deliver health and basic needs services, and connect clients to CARE Centers and other homeless services. C. Assess Severity and type of needs are assessed through a variety of tools:  Prevention/Diversion Pre-Screen: Identifies need for financial assistance and/or case management services to prevent a person at risk of homelessness from becoming homeless, or to divert a person experiencing homelessness from entering the crisis response system (including emergency shelter and transitional housing)  Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) Intake: Collects basic information about a client, including information to determine eligibility and prioritization for emergency shelter  Emergency Shelter Prioritization Tool: in combination with the HMIS Intake, prioritizes individuals and families for available emergency shelter beds  VI-SPDAT: The Vulnerability Index – Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool, an evidence- based tool that prioritizes individuals, transition-age youth, and families for available permanent housing based on acuity and chronicity D. Assign Clients are matched with available resources based on need and vulnerability. The most vulnerable clients are prioritized for available housing navigation and location services. The full continuum of DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 96 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) our homeless housing and services are available through the Contra Costa Coordinated Entry system, including:  Prevention/Diversion: Financial assistance or case management to stay housed  Basic Needs and Services: showers, food, laundry, benefits enrollment, referrals, etc.  Emergency Shelter: Short-term, temporary place to stay  Housing Navigation Services: Assistance with locating and obtaining housing  Rapid Re-housing: Time-limited rental assistance with case management  Permanent Supportive Housing: Long-term housing assistance with services 3. Identify the process for making sub-awards and describe how the ESG allocation available to private nonprofit organizations (including community and faith-based organizations). The County allocates ESG funds through a competitive application process. The RFP is posted on the Conservation and Development Department’s website and notice is mailed or emailed to the “Interested Persons” contact list. This list includes local social service agencies, homeless service providers and other interested individuals, as well as other County departments. Applications are reviewed by staff for completeness and for compliance with program requirements. Technical assistance is provided to applicants as needed by County staff. Funds are allocated based on the requirements of ESG regulations and the need for services within the County. ESG funding recommendations are presented to the CoC through the Contra Costa Council on Homelessness and then approved by the County's Board of Supervisors. ESG applicants are invited and encouraged to attend these meetings. Three out of the five ESG funded activities for FY 2019/20 are carried out by nonprofit organizations. 4. If the jurisdiction is unable to meet the homeless participation requirement in 24 CF R 576.405(a), the jurisdiction must specify its plan for reaching out to and consulting with homeless or formerly homeless individuals in considering policies and funding decisions regarding facilities and services funded under ESG. The County meets the requirement for homeless participation in the provision of services by consulting and coordinating services with the CoC and Council on Homelessness. The CoC and the Council on Homelessness provide a forum for communication and coordination among agencies and as a group provides advice and input on the operations of homeless services. Consumer input is incorporated into the development of local services through the ongoing participation of consumers in local meetings where they are given the opportunity to provide specific feedback on their needs and experiences with the existing system. In addition, each funded project is required to outline how homeless persons are involved in the operation of shelters and provision of services. Furthermore, the County’s Council on Homelessness has a Consumer/Consumer Advocate seat in which the person appointed to that seat typically is either a current or previous consumer of the County’s homeless services. The Consumer/Consumer Advocate seat is currently filled. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 97 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) 5. Describe performance standards for evaluating ESG. A performance measurement outcome statement is included in all ESG contracts between the County and subrecipients. Projects are monitored and evaluated on meeting the requirements detailed in the statement. Subrecipients are also required to submit periodic progress reports detailing project progress toward objectives, problems and/or resolution to meeting goals, quantitative participation data by ethnicity, income, and household status. The projects are also subject to financial audit review by County staff. Additional requirements for performance goals and the evaluation of outcomes are determined in conjunction with the CoC and the Council on Homelessness. DRAFT Annual Action Plan 2019 98 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) DRAFT 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 1 of ? DRAFT ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING Contra Costa County Consortium (Contra Costa County, Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek) Housing Authority of Contra Costa County Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburg & Richmond Housing Authority May 2019 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 2 of ? Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Chapter 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Glossary ......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 14 1.3 Demographic Summary ....................................................................................................... 15 1.4 Summary of Key Fair Housing Issues and Contributing Factors ......................... 17 Segregation/Integration ................................................................................................ 17 Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs)..................... 17 Disproportionate Housing Needs ............................................................................... 18 Access to Opportunity ..................................................................................................... 19 Publicly Supported Housing ......................................................................................... 20 Disability and Access ....................................................................................................... 21 Fair Housing Enforcement, Outreach, and Capacity ........................................... 21 1.5 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................. 22 Chapter 2. Community Participation Process .............................................................................................. 23 Chapter 3. Assessment of Past Goals and Actions ...................................................................................... 28 3.1 Fair Housing Goals in Recent Analysis of Impediments .......................................... 28 3.2 Progress Toward Goals ........................................................................................................ 31 Chapter 4. Fair Housing Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 35 4.1 Demographic Profile Summary ......................................................................................... 35 Demographic Patterns Since 1990 ............................................................................ 35 4.2 Segregation and Integration ............................................................................................... 46 Segregation in jurisdictions, region, and racial/ethnic groups ...................... 46 Areas of high segregation and integration .............................................................. 49 Change in segregation over time (since 1990) ..................................................... 55 Owner & Renter Housing with Trends Over Time............................................... 57 Demographic Patterns Contributing to Future Segregation ............................ 59 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 3 of ? Segregation Affecting Other Protected Groups ..................................................... 62 Contributing Factors to Segregation ......................................................................... 64 4.3 Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs) ...................... 85 Identification of R/ECAPs .............................................................................................. 86 Predominant Protected Classes Residing in R/ECAPs ....................................... 88 Change in R/ECAPs Over Time (since 1990) ......................................................... 88 Additional R/ECAP Information ................................................................................. 89 R/ECAP Place-based Investments & Mobility Options ...................................... 89 Contributing Factors of R/ECAPs ............................................................................... 93 4.4 Disparities in Access to Opportunity .............................................................................. 98 Educational Opportunities ............................................................................................ 98 Employment Opportunities ........................................................................................ 106 Transportation Opportunities ................................................................................... 109 Access to Low Poverty Neighborhoods .................................................................. 113 Access to Environmentally Healthy Neighborhoods ........................................ 116 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 120 Contributing Factors to Disparity in Access to Opportunity ......................... 120 4.5 Disproportionate Housing Needs ................................................................................... 128 Groups with Higher Rates of Housing Problems & Cost Burden ................. 129 Areas of Greatest Housing Burdens ......................................................................... 133 Availability of Family Units in Publicly Supported Housing Stock .............. 135 Renter & Owner-Occupied Housing Differences by Race/Ethnicity ........... 135 Additional Information About Disproportionate Housing Needs................ 137 Contributing Factors of Disproportionate Housing Needs ............................. 141 4.6 Publicly Supported Housing Analysis ........................................................................... 148 History ................................................................................................................................ 148 Public Housing Authorities ......................................................................................... 149 Demographic Analysis .................................................................................................. 150 Publicly Supported Housing Location and Occupancy Analysis .................. 156 Disparities in Access to Opportunity for Residents of PSH ............................ 165 Contributing Factors of Publicly Supported Housing Location and Occupancy ......................................................................................................................... 167 4.7 Disability and Access ........................................................................................................... 179 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 4 of ? Population Profile ........................................................................................................... 179 Housing Accessibility .................................................................................................... 181 Integration of Persons with Disabilities Living in Institutions and Other Segregated Settings ........................................................................................................ 186 Disparities in Access to Opportunity ...................................................................... 191 Disability and Access Issues Contributing Factors ............................................ 196 4.8 Fair Housing Enforcement, Outreach Capacity, and Resources Analysis ........ 211 Unresolved complaints, findings, etc., including the following .................... 212 State and local fair housing laws .............................................................................. 213 Local and regional agencies and organizations that provide fair housing information, outreach, and enforcement, and capacity and the resources available to them ............................................................................................................. 214 Fair housing enforcement, outreach capacity, and resources ....................... 215 Fair Housing Enforcement, Outreach Capacity, and Resources Contributing Factors ................................................................................................................................ 215 Chapter 5. Regional Analysis of Impediments Goals ................................................................................ 219 Technical Appendix ............................................................................................................................................... 223 Demographic Profile .................................................................................................................... 223 Tables .................................................................................................................................. 223 Segregation and Integration ..................................................................................................... 239 Tables .................................................................................................................................. 239 Maps ..................................................................................................................................... 246 Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs) ............................. 265 Tables .................................................................................................................................. 265 Maps ..................................................................................................................................... 266 Disparities in Access to Opportunity ..................................................................................... 270 Tables .................................................................................................................................. 270 Maps ..................................................................................................................................... 289 Figures ................................................................................................................................ 408 Disproportionate Housing Needs ........................................................................................... 410 Tables .................................................................................................................................. 410 Maps ..................................................................................................................................... 422 Publicly Supported Housing ..................................................................................................... 426 Tables .................................................................................................................................. 426 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 5 of ? Maps ..................................................................................................................................... 437 Disability and Access ................................................................................................................... 451 Tables .................................................................................................................................. 451 Maps ..................................................................................................................................... 454 Fair Housing Enforcement, Outreach Capacity, and Resources Analysis ............... 462 Tables .................................................................................................................................. 462 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 6 of ? Chapter 1. Executive Summary 1.1 Glossary Throughout this document you will find specialized terms used to describe some of the research and findings. Please take a few minutes to familiarize yourself with some of the words and the way they are being defined and used in this Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice.      Accessibility: whether a physical structure, object, or technology is able to be used by people with disabilities such as mobility issues, hearing impairment, or vision impairment. Accessibility features include wheelchair ramps, audible crosswalk signals, and TTY numbers. See: TTY Affirmatively Further Fair Housing (AFFH): a requirement under the Fair Housing Act that local governments take steps to further fair housing, especially in places that have been historically segregated. American Community Survey (ACS): a survey conducted by the US Census Bureau that regularly gathers information about demographics, education, income, language proficiency, disability, employment, and housing. Unlike the Census, ACS surveys are conducted both yearly and across multiple years. The surveys study samples of the population, rather than counting every person in the U.S. like the Census. Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA): federal civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities. Annual Action Plan: an annual plan used by local jurisdictions that receive money from HUD to plan how they will spend the funds to address fair housing and community development. The Annual Action Plan carries out the larger Consolidated Plan. See also: Consolidated Plan. Bane Civil Rights Act: a state civil rights law which forbids anyone from interfering by force or threat of violence with your federal or state constitutional or statutory rights. Capital Improvement Plan: a short-range plan, usually four to ten years, which identifies capital projects and equipment purchases, provides a planning schedule and identifies options for financing the plan. CDBG: Community Development Block Grant. Money that local governments receive from HUD to spend on housing and community improvement. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 7 of ? Census Designated Places: a label assigned by the Census Bureau to communities that resemble cities or towns, but which are not formally incorporated and do not have their own municipal government. See: Unincorporated Land. Census Tract: small subdivisions of cities, towns, and rural areas that the Census uses to group residents together and accurately evaluate the demographics of a community. Several census tracts, put together, make up a town, city, or rural area. Central Contra Costa County: in this analysis, “central Contra Costa County” refers to the communities in the central part of the County, including (for example) Concord, Walnut Creek, Alamo, Clayton, Pleasant Hill, Martinez, Danville, Lafayette, Moraga, Orinda, and San Ramon. Consent Decree: a settlement agreement that resolves a dispute between two parties without admitting guilt or liability. The court maintains supervision over the implementation of the consent decree, including any payments or actions taken as required by the consent decree. Consolidated Plan (Con Plan): a plan that helps local governments evaluate their affordable housing and community development needs and market conditions. Local governments must use their Consolidated Plan to identify how they will spend money from HUD to address fair housing and community development. Any local government that receives money from HUD in the form of CDBG, HOME, ESG, or HOPWA grants must have a Consolidated Plan. Consolidated Plans are carried out through annual Action Plans. See: Action Plan, CDBG, HOME, ESG, HOPWA. Consortium: the Contra Costa County Consortium includes the cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek, and Contra Costa County (with the County representing the other incorporated cities as well the unincorporated areas of the County). Table 1 – Participating Cities in the Contra Costa Urban County Brentwood El Cerrito Martinez Orinda Richmond Clayton Hercules Moraga Pinole San Pablo Danville Lafayette Oakley Pleasant Hill San Ramon Table 2 – Unincorporated Communities in the Contra Costa Urban County Alamo Byron Contra Costa Centre El Sobrante North Richmond Port Costa Bay Point Canyon Diablo Kensington Rodeo Saranap Bethel Island Crockett Discovery Bay Knightsen Rollingwood Tara Hills Blackhawk Clyde East Richmond Heights Montalvin Manor Pacheco Vine Hill Continuum of Care (CoC): a HUD program designed to promote commitment to the goal of ending homelessness. The program provides funding to nonprofits and state and local governments to quickly rehouse homeless individuals and families, promote access to and 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 8 of ? effect utilization of mainstream programs by homeless individuals, and optimize self- sufficiency among individuals and families experiencing homelessness. Contra Costa County (“the County”): as used throughout this document’s fair housing analysis, the term “County” refers to the entirety of Contra Costa County, inclusive of the entitlement jurisdictions that are also part of the Consortium. Data and Mapping Tool (AFFHT): an online HUD resource combining data from various sources including HUD, the decennial Census data and the American Community Survey to generate maps and tables evaluating the demographics of an area for a variety of categories, including race, national origin, disability, Limited English Proficiency, housing problems, environmental health, and school proficiency, etc. Density Bonus: an incentive for developers that allows developers to increase the maximum number of units allowed at a building site in exchange for either affordable housing funds or making a certain percentage of the units affordable. Disparate Impact: practices in housing that negatively affect one group of people with a protected characteristic (such as race, sex, or disability, etc.) more than other people without that characteristic, even though the rules applied by landlords do not single out that group. Dissimilarity Index: measures the percentage of a certain group’s population that would have to move to a different census tract in order to be evenly distributed with a city or metropolitan area in relation to another group. The higher the Dissimilarity Index, the higher the level of segregation. For example, if a city’s Black/White Dissimilarity Index was 65, then 65 percent of Black residents would need to move to another neighborhood in order for Blacks and Whites to be evenly distributed across all neighborhoods in the city. East Contra Costa County: in this analysis, “east Contra Costa County” refers to the eastern side of the County, including (for examples) communities such as Pittsburg, Antioch, Brentwood, Bay Point, Oakley, Knightsen, Discovery Bay, and Bethel Island. ESG: Emergency Solutions Grant. Funding provided by HUD to 1) engage homeless individuals and families living on the street, 2) improve the number and quality of emergency shelters for homeless individuals and families, 3) help operate these shelters, 4) provide essential services to shelter residents, 5) rapidly re-house homeless individuals and families, and 6) prevent families/individuals from becoming homeless. Entitlement Jurisdiction: a local government that receives funds from HUD to be spent on housing and community development. Within the Consortium, Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek are entitlement jurisdictions. Other areas receive funding through the County. Environmental Health Index: a HUD calculation based on potential exposure to harmful toxins at a neighborhood level. This includes air quality carcinogenic, respiratory, and 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 9 of ? neurological hazards. The higher the number, the less exposure to toxins harmful to human health. Environmental Justice: the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people, especially minorities, in the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. In the past, environmental hazards have been concentrated near segregated neighborhoods, making minorities more likely to experience negative health effects. Recognizing this history and working to make changes in future environmental planning are important pieces of environmental justice. Exclusionary Zoning: the use of zoning ordinances to prevent certain land uses, especially the building of large and affordable apartment buildings for low-income people. A city with exclusionary zoning might only allow single-family homes to be built in the city, excluding people who cannot afford to buy a house. Exposure Index: a measurement of how much the typical person of a specific race is exposed to people of other races. A higher number means that the average person of that race lives in a census tract with a higher percentage of people from another group. Fair Housing Act: a federal civil rights law that prohibits housing discrimination on the basis of race, class, sex, religion, national origin, or familial status. See also: Housing Discrimination. Federal Uniform Accessibility Standards (UFAS): a guide to uniform standards for design, construction, and alternation of buildings so that physically handicapped people will be able to access and use such buildings. Gentrification: the process of renovating or improving a house or neighborhood to make it more attractive to middle-class residents. Gentrification often causes the cost of living in the neighborhood to rise, pushing out lower-income residents and attracting middle-class residents. Often, these effects which are driven by housing costs have a corresponding change in the racial demographics of an area. HOME: HOME Investment Partnership. HOME provides grants to States and localities that communities use (often in partnership with nonprofits) to fund activities such as building, buying, and/or rehabilitating affordable housing for rent or ownership, or providing direct rental assistance to low-income people. HOPWA: Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS. HUD makes grants under the HOPWA program to local communities, states, and nonprofits for projects that benefit low-income people living with HIV/AIDS and their families Housing Choice Voucher (HCV): a HUD rental subsidy issued to a low-income household that promises to pay a certain amount of the household’s rent. Prices, or payment standards, are set based on the rent in the metropolitan area, and voucher households must pay any 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 10 of ? difference between the rent and the voucher amount. Participants of the HCV program are free to choose any rental housing that meets program requirements Housing Discrimination: the refusal to rent to or inform a potential tenant about the availability of housing. Housing discrimination also applies to buying a home or getting a loan to buy a home. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate against a potential tenant/buyer/lendee based on that person’s race, class, sex, religion, national origin, or familial status. Housing Element: a required chapter in a California city’s General Plan which must be regularly reviewed and approved by the state. A Housing Element contains information on the housing needs of the community, including low-income households and people with special needs. It provides a detailed explanation of how the government addresses the needs of the community based on existing and future housing needs, and inventories sites in the community that could accommodate affordable housing development. Housing Impact Fee: a fee imposed on new construction to help fund affordable housing construction. See also: Commercial Linkage Fee. HUD Grantee: a jurisdiction (city, country, consortium, state, etc.) that receives money from HUD. See also: Entitlement Jurisdiction. Inclusionary Zoning: a zoning ordinance that requires that a certain percentage of any newly built housing must be affordable to people with low and moderate incomes. Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): a federal civil rights law that ensures students with a disability are provided with Free Appropriate Public Education that is tailored to their individual needs. Isolation Index: a measurement of how much the typical person of a specific race is only exposed to people of the same race. For example, an 80 percent isolation index value for White people would mean that the population of people the typical White person is exposed to is 80 percent White. Jobs Availability Index: number of jobs per 1000 people within a five mile radius of the census tract center-point. Index is computed by the UC Davis Center for Regional Change. Jobs Proximity Index: a HUD calculation based on distances to all job locations, distance from any single job location, size of employment at that location, and labor supply to that location. The higher the number, the better the access to employment opportunities for residents in a neighborhood. Labor Market Engagement Index: a HUD calculation based on level of employment, labor force participation, and educational attainment in a census tract. The higher the number, the higher the labor force participation and human capital in the neighborhood. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 11 of ? Lamorinda: an informal name used to refer to the Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda area. Limited English Proficiency (LEP): residents who do not speak English as a first language, and who speak English less than “very well.” Local Data: any data used in this analysis that is not provided by HUD through the Data and Mapping Tool (AFFHT), or through the Census or American Community Survey. Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): provides tax incentives to encourage individual and corporate investors to invest in the development, acquisition, and rehabilitation of affordable rental housing. Low Poverty Index: a HUD calculation using both family poverty rates and public assistance receipt in the form of cash-welfare (such as Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)). This is calculated at the Census Tract level. The higher the score, the less exposure to poverty in the neighborhood. Low Transportation Cost Index: a HUD calculation that estimates transportation costs for a family of 3, with a single parent, with an income at 50 percent of the median income for renters for the region. The higher the number, the lower the cost of transportation in the neighborhood. Market Rate Housing: housing that is not restricted by affordable housing laws. A market rate unit can be rented for any price that the market can support. NIMBY: Not In My Back Yard. A social and political movement that opposes housing or commercial development in local communities NIMBY complaints often involve affordable housing, with reasons ranging from traffic concerns to small town quality to, in some cases, thinly-veiled racism. Poverty Line: the minimum level of yearly income needed to allow a household to afford the necessities of life such as housing, clothing, and food. The poverty line is defined on a national basis. The US poverty line for a family of four with two children under 18 is $22,162. Project-Based Section 8, Project-Based Rental Assistance, PBRA: a government-funded program that provides rental housing to low-income households in privately owned and managed rental units. The funding is specific to the building. If you move out of the building, you will no longer receive the funding. Public Housing: housing that is owned and managed by a Public Housing Authority for eligible low-income households. Publicly Supported Housing: housing assisted with funding through federal, State, or local agencies or programs, as well as housing that is financed or administered by or through any such agencies or programs. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 12 of ? Other Multi-Family Housing: multifamily housing that is owned and operated by private owners, and is subsidized through programs other than HCV, PBRA, or LIHTC. Units include properties funded through Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202), and Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811). Quintile: twenty percent of a population; one-fifth of a population divided into five equal groups Ralph Civil Rights Act: a state civil rights law which forbids acts of violence, because of (for example) your race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, political party, or your part in a labor dispute Reasonable Accommodation: a change to rules, policies, practices, or services which would allow a handicapped person an equal opportunity to use and enjoy their housing, including in public and common use areas. It is a violation of the Fair Housing Act to refuse to make a reasonable accommodation when such accommodation is necessary for the handicapped person to have equal use and enjoyment of the housing. R/ECAPs: Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty. This is a HUD-defined term indicating a census tract that has more than 50 percent Non-White residents, and 40 percent or more of the population is in poverty OR where the poverty rate is greater than three times the average poverty rate in the area. In the HUD Data and Mapping Tool (AFFHT), R/ECAPS are outlined in pink. Region: As designated by HUD, Contra Costa County is located within the San Francisco- Oakland-Hayward Region, which includes the Counties of San Francisco, Alameda, Marin, Contra Costa, and San Mateo. The region may also be referred to as “the Bay Area” more generally. Rehabilitation Act (Section 504): a federal civil rights law that prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in programs conducted by federal agencies, in programs receiving federal financial assistance, in federal employment and in the employment practices of federal contractors. Rent Control: a form of price control that limits the amount a property owner can charge for renting out a home, apartment, or other real estate. Rent can be controlled by setting a maximum dollar amount, or by setting a maximum percentage increase when rents are raised. Rent control is usually put in place by a local law. For example, Richmond has a rent control ordinance. School Proficiency Index: a HUD calculation based on performance of 4th grade students on state exams to describe which neighborhoods have high-performing elementary schools nearby and which are near lower performing elementary schools. The higher the number, the higher the school system quality is in a neighborhood. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 13 of ? Segregation: the separation or isolation of a race /ethnic group , national origin group, individuals with disabilities, or other social group by enforced or voluntary residence in a restricted area, by barriers to social connection or dealings between persons or groups, by separate educational facilities, or by other discrim inatory means. Source of Income Discrimination: for purposes of this analysis, housing discrimination based on whether a potential tenant plans to use a Housing Choice Voucher/Section 8 Voucher to pay part of their rent. Increasingly, cities and states are outlawing source of income discrimination. See also: Housing Choice Voucher/Section 8 Voucher. Superfund Sites: any land in the U.S. that has been contaminated by hazardous waste and identified by the EPA as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment Supplemental Security Income (SSI): benefits paid to disabled adults and children who have limited income and resources, or to people 65 and older without disabilities who meet the financial limits. Testers: people who apply for housing to determine whether the landlord is illegally discriminating. For example, Black and White testers will both apply for housing with the same landlord, and if they are treated differently or given different information about available housing, their experiences are compared to show evidence of discrimination. Transit Trips Index: a HUD calculation that estimates transit trips taken for a family of 3, with a single parent, with an income at 50 percent of the median income for renters for the region. The higher the number, the more likely residents in that neighborhood utilize public transit. TTY/TDD: Text Telephone/Telecommunication Device for the Deaf. TTY is the more widely used term. People who are deaf or hard of hearing can use a text telephone to communicate with other people who have a TTY number and device. TTY services are an important resource for government offices to have so that deaf or hard of hearing people can easily communicate with them. Unbanked: not served by a financial institution. Underbanked: an area that does not have enough banks to meet market demand Unincorporated land: land that has not been formally converted into a city or town and that does not have its own municipal government. Unincorporated land within the County is governed by the County government. Unincorporated land can still have large communities that resemble cities or towns, even though these communities lack municipal governments. See: Census Designated Places. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 14 of ? Unruh Civil Rights Act: a state civil rights law that outlaws discrimination based on sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, or sexual orientation. Violence Against Women Act (VAWA): a federal law protecting women who have experienced domestic and/or sexual violence. The law establishes several programs and services including a federal rape shield law, community violence prevention programs, protections for victims who are evicted because of events related to domestic violence or stalking, funding for victim assistance services, like rape crisis centers and hotlines, programs to meet the needs of immigrant women and women of different races or ethnicities, programs and services for victims with disabilities, and legal aid for survivors of domestic violence. West County: in this analysis, “west Contra Costa County” refers to the western part of the County, covering areas such as (for example) Richmond, Hercules, Kensington, San Pablo, Pinole, and El Cerrito. White Flight: the movement of White residents from cities to predominantly White suburbs YIMBY: “Yes In My Back Yard.” A social movement to counter NIMBYism, which is pro- development and particularly pro-affordable development. YIMBYism attempts to respond to the skyrocketing housing market in the San Francisco Bay area. 1.2 Introduction This Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice (AI) documents a variety of fair housing issues faced by the residents of Contra Costa County, assesses their underlying causes, and identifies goals and actions to address those issues. It aims to harness data, community input, and policy analysis to craft solutions that will have a real impact for the people of Contra Costa County. Ultimately, we hope that this information will advance housing choice and stability, help families break the cycle of poverty and find new opportunities, address segregation, and invest in the communities that need it most. This AI is a collaborative effort by a number of local governments and public housing authorities: the Contra Costa County Consortium, which includes the cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek, and Contra Costa County (with the County representing the other incorporated cities and unincorporated areas of the County); and the Housing Authorities of Contra Costa County, Richmond, and Pittsburg. Each of these entities has varied needs, but they also face issues of collective significance to the region and its future, and have a shared commitment to advancing fair housing. In addition, because each of them receives federal housing and community development funding, they are required to take steps to “affirmatively further fair housing”: that is, to take proactive steps to expand choice, address segregation and exclusion, and enable fair access to opportunity. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has described this responsibility as follows: 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 15 of ? “Taking meaningful actions, in addition to combating discrimination, that overcome patterns of segregation and foster inclusive communities free from barriers that restrict access to opportunity based on protected characteristics. Specifically, affirmatively furthering fair housing means taking meaningful actions that, taken together, address significant disparities in housing needs and in access to opportunity, replacing segregated living patterns with truly integrated and balanced living patterns, transforming racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty into areas of opportunity, and fostering and maintaining compliance with civil rights and fair housing laws.” (2015 AFFH Regulation Preamble.) As recipients of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Consortium members must periodically develop an AI, which they use to better understand current fair housing needs in the County, localities, and region and communicate these needs to the public. The AI is a part of a multi-stage planning process: it provides a focused, comprehensive look into fair housing issues and generates fair housing goals, which the CDBG Consortium members will then use to inform later planning processes, such as the Consolidated Plan (designating use of block grant funds), as well as other relevant activities. While housing issues are complex and multi-faceted, and affect all residents of the region, the purpose of this AI is to focus specifically on fair housing and related needs and actions. The AI therefore examines whether housing issues are experienced differently on the basis of characteristics protected by the Fair Housing Act, which was crafted to address segregation and to prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, and disability. It also includes characteristics protected under state and local law, including California’s protections for sexual orientation and gender identity. The AI follows the Assessment of Fair Housing process and template, as developed by HUD in its 2015 regulation and Assessment Tool. As described below, its scope includes in-depth looks at a number of areas relevant to fair housing, including: trends and description of demographics; patterns of segregation and integration; identification of racially/ethically concentrated areas of poverty (“R/ECAPs”); disproportionate housing needs (including cost burden and the adequacy and safety of housing); disparities in access to opportunity (education, employment, low poverty exposure, and environmental health); disabilities and access; publicly-supported housing; and fair housing enforcement, outreach, and capacity. In addition to data, maps, and policy analysis, it examines barriers to fair housing and their underlying causes (“contributing factors”). Most importantly, its data and analyses (including community input) provide the foundation for meaningful fair housing goals that address specific local issues. 1.3 Demographic Summary Contra Costa County is a large, diverse jurisdiction that contains urban, suburban, and rural areas within its boundaries. The County also includes areas that afford high levels of 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 16 of ? opportunity to their residents, communities suffering from severe distress, and many in between those two poles. Its communities include both those that have been historically subject to redlining and state-sanctioned disinvestment and those that have deliberately excluded low-income people and people of color. Some of those historically disinvested areas are now facing gentrification and displacement pressures due to broader regional trends in the Bay Area. Meanwhile, a few, but not most, of the County’s historically exclusionary areas have undergone significant demographic changes as a result of the suburbanization of poverty and the displacement of low-income people of color from communities like Richmond, Oakland, and San Francisco. The County’s four cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek, as well as the service area of the Richmond Housing Authority, are microcosms of these broader patterns.  The Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg in eastern Contra Costa County (east County) have rapidly become much more racially and socioeconomically diverse in recent decades.  Concord has a range of neighborhoods from those characterized by concentrated poverty, middle-class areas, and affluent ones, and, in the predominantly Hispanic and low-income “Monument Corridor,” initial displacement risk factors are apparent.  The City of Walnut Creek remains an area of concentrated advantage and predominantly non-Hispanic White population.  The City of Richmond, served by the Richmond Housing Authority, is beginning to experience the gentrification and displacement pressures that are widespread in the Inner Bay.  Consistent with the relatively high Hispanic population and relatively low Asian American population in the County in relation to the region, Mexican ancestry is the most common national origin in the County and in the cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek.  The degree to which Mexican American population is concentrated in relation to other groups is less pronounced in Walnut Creek than in the other cities. With respect to age and familial status, the County has a higher proportion of children, a lower proportion of working age adults, and a similar proportion of elderly individuals in comparison to the region.  The Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg have much higher concentrations of children.  The City of Walnut Creek is more heavily elderly and has fewer families with children.  The City of Concord has the highest concentration of working age adults and comparatively few families with children.  Antioch, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek are more heavily female than the County and the region, while Concord is more heavily male. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 17 of ? The population of persons with disabilities is higher in the County than region-wide.  In the Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg, that is true across all categories of disabilities.  In Walnut Creek, that is true for all types of disabilities except for cognitive and self- care disabilities.  In Concord, that is true for all types of disabilities except for self-care and independent living disabilities. 1.4 Summary of Key Fair Housing Issues and Contributing Factors Segregation/Integration Segregation in the County, the region, and the cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek is primarily an inter-jurisdictional rather than an intra-jurisdictional phenomenon (that is, it is more apparent when comparing various jurisdictions rather than within the jurisdictions).  Cities like Antioch, Pittsburg, Walnut Creek, and Richmond either have high concentrations of people of color or high concentrations of non-Hispanic White individuals, and those residents live across those cities’ neighborhoods.  The exception to this trend arises mostly in the region’s larger cities such as San Francisco, Oakland, and, in the case of the County, Concord. o These larger cities have more variety between neighborhoods. o In the case of Concord, Hispanic population is relatively concentrated in the Monument Corridor and adjacent neighborhoods in the western portion of the city. This qualified, yet predominant trend of inter-city, rather than intra-city, segregation explains why the County and the region have relatively high levels of segregation as measured by the Dissimilarity Index, but the County’s cities generally do not. Segregation in the area has many drivers or contributing factors including but not limited to zoning and land use laws, the location and type of affordable housing, and source of income discrimination. Racially/Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs) Under HUD’s definition of Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs), there is only one R/ECAP in the County, which is located in the Monument Corridor in the City of Concord. R/ECAPs are defined as census tracts in which a majority of the population is 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 18 of ? comprised of people of color and the poverty rate is at least three times that of the average census tract level poverty rate in the region. For example, the federal poverty line for a family of four is $25,100. In the context of the County, the national poverty rate is not a good measurement for R/ECAPs, as the cost of living in the Bay Area far exceeds the national average. The R/ECAPs section of this AI expands the focus to look at all census tracts that meet the racial/ethnic composition threshold and have a poverty rate of 25 percent or more. Under this definition, there are R/ECAPs in Richmond, North Richmond, San Pablo, Bay Point, Pittsburg, and Antioch, in addition to those in Concord. This understanding of the County’s R/ECAPs is consistent with local knowledge. These R/ECAPs, particularly those in east County, are fueled by a lack of opportunities for decent paying jobs as well as the exclusionary policies, such as zoning, that prevent low-income people of color living in R/ECAPs from moving elsewhere. Disproportionate Housing Needs According to HUD data, a significant percentage of residents throughout Contra Costa County experience housing needs, defined by HUD as cost burden, severe cost burden, overcrowding, and incomplete kitchen or plumbing facilities. The rate of these needs varies by group and location.  Hispanic and Black residents face particularly severe housing problems. These housing burdens are greatest in portions of Richmond, North Richmond, San Pablo, Hercules, Concord, Martinez, Pittsburg, Antioch, and Oakley.  Data on publicly-supported housing shows a significant need for family-sized units; a significant minority of Project-Based Voucher and public housing units are multi-family units. o Among assisted households, a disproportionately large share of family-sized households are located in Pittsburg and Antioch, compared to the rest of the County.  HUD data also shows significant disparities in the rates of renter and owner-occupied housing by race/ethnicity in Contra Costa County, although Antioch and Pittsburg have significantly higher homeownership rates by Hispanic and Black residents than in the County as a whole. Additional sources of data and information document the severity of rising cost pressures and the extent of residential displacement and relocation throughout the County. This has also contributed to homelessness in the County, and to a lack of sufficient services to support residents in east County. Significant contributing factors to disproportionate housing needs include:  Availability of family-sized subsidized units (or those affordable to subsidized households) throughout the County; 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 19 of ?  Displacement of residents due to economic pressures;  Rising housing costs; source of income discrimination (because this prevents voucher holders from accessing a wider variety of units in more locations);  Displacement due to domestic violence and sexual assault (as well as harassment on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity);  Lending discrimination;  Loss of affordable housing; and  Lack of regional cooperation (which has contributed to a shortage of affordable units). Access to Opportunity This analysis examines several dimensions of access to opportunity, by supplementing HUD data with local data and knowledge. Often, groups that have experienced housing discrimination have lower access to a variety of opportunity factors, which are discussed in this document. These disparities include lower access to educational opportunity, employment; transit; lower access to areas of concentrated poverty (low poverty exposure); and lower access to healthy neighborhoods. Lack of access to opportunity factors often goes hand-in-hand with segregation and housing choice. As a composite, HUD and other local data show that:  Access to opportunity is highest for non-Hispanic whites in Contra Costa County. The various report measurements show that County neighborhoods with the most whites have the most access to opportunity.  Access to opportunity is lowest for non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics. The various report measurements show that census tracts with the highest numbers of blacks and Hispanics have the lowest scores in the categories that measure access to opportunity.  In addition, opportunity scores are often lower on average in those County neighborhoods with higher numbers of foreign-born individuals. Geographic trends are also evident. Across various dimensions, access to opportunity is:  Lowest in western and north-eastern sections of the County, specifically in the cities of Richmond, Pittsburg, and in Antioch.  Highest in central Contra Costa County, including Walnut Creek, Danville, Alamo, San Ramon, Lafayette, Orinda, and Moraga. Significant contributing factors to disparities in access to opportunity include:  Availability of reliable public transportation; 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 20 of ?  Lack of access to opportunity due to rising housing costs;  Lack of regional and local cooperation;  Location of employers;  Location of schools and student assignment plans; and  Location of environmental health hazards. Publicly Supported Housing The analysis of Publicly Supported Housing takes into account HUD and local public Housing Authority data to provide a comprehensive fair housing examination of publicly supported housing in the County. This includes the jurisdictions of the three Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) operating in Contra Costa: the Housing Authority of Contra Costa County (HACCC), the Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburg (HACP), and the Richmond Housing Authority (RHA). Across the three PHAs and all programs of publicly supported housing in the County, this study finds that:  Blacks comprise the most significantly overrepresented population  Hispanics compromise the second-most overrepresented.  Whites, comprise a significantly smaller share of each program compared to the jurisdiction’s overall White population, despite their greater representation in the overall population of residents that are eligible for publicly supported housing.  Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) units are fairly evenly distributed throughout the County.  While Project-Based Section 8 units tend to be more evenly dispersed throughout the Consortium’s area, patterns of concentration can be seen in central Contra Costa County.  Public housing is most heavily concentrated in and around the cities of Richmond and Pittsburg.  Overall, publicly supported housing in the County is predominantly located in low- opportunity areas, where lower-proficiency schools, environmental health concerns, and higher poverty rates are prevalent. Significant contributing factors to publicly supported housing location and occupancy include:  Lack of housing search assistance, appropriate voucher payment standards, landlord outreach, and formalized mobility counseling for Housing Choice Voucher participants; 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 21 of ?  Lack of source of income protections;  Jurisdictional fragmentation;  Lack of a consolidated waitlist; and  Siting selection policies and practices. Disability and Access This AI’s review of Disability and Access provides an overview of housing accessibility, community integration, and access to reasonable accommodations and modifications, and finds:  The amount of affordable, accessible housing across the region, the County, and cities within Contra Costa County is insufficient to meet the total need among low-income persons with disabilities who need accessibility features.  Community integration efforts in California for individuals who are at risk of unjustified institutionalization, particularly including persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities and persons with psychiatric disabilities, are further along than they are in most states. This is due to the ambitious use of Medicaid waivers and the availability of funds for permanent supportive housing through the Mental Health Services Act, as well as the recent implementation of the No Place Like Home program, which dedicates up to $2 billion in bond proceeds to the development of permanent supportive housing.  Nonetheless, there are unmet needs for wraparound supportive services for persons with psychiatric disabilities and for permanent supportive housing for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Fair Housing Enforcement, Outreach, and Capacity The Fair Employment and Housing Act and the Unruh Civil Rights Act are the primary California fair housing laws. California state law extends anti-discrimination protections in housing to several classes that are not covered by the federal Fair Housing Act of 1968, including prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Several organizations provide fair housing services in Contra Costa County. ECHO Housing conducts fair housing testing and provides counseling, mediation, and education in Antioch, Concord, Walnut Creek, the other cities in the County (except Pittsburg) and unincorporated Contra Costa County. Bay Area Legal Aid also works to eliminate housing discrimination through education, outreach, and enforcement throughout Contra Costa County while Pacific Community Services works in Pittsburg. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 22 of ? While these organizations provide valuable assistance, the capacity and funding that they have is generally insufficient. Greater resources would enable stronger outreach efforts, including populations that may be less aware of their fair housing rights, such as limited- English proficiency and LGBTQ residents. In addition to lack of resources for fair housing enforcement and outreach, private discrimination is a significant contributing factor in this area. 1.5 Conclusion The accompanying document provides a more in-depth look into each of the areas above, based on maps and data provided by HUD, additional local data and maps, and policy documents. It also identifies Contributing Factors that play a role in creating these fair housing. The final version of the AI will incorporate community input and additional information provided by the public. It will also set out fair housing goals for the Consortium members and PHAs. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 23 of ? Chapter 2. Community Participation Process Community participation is critical to ensuring that the Analysis of Impediments reflects community conditions, and that the goals and strategies to address fair housing issues are both targeted and feasible. The Contra Costa Consortium and public housing authorities engaged a wide range of stakeholders and members of the community in this process. Outreach efforts included the dissemination of a survey, in-person meetings with an array of stakeholders and agencies, and community meetings to engage with residents across Contra Costa County. The input from stakeholders, agencies, and residents was deeply appreciated and essentially in shaping this AI. Stakeholder Meetings PRRAC and the Lawyers’ Committee conducted rounds of targeted in-person stakeholder meetings starting in September 2017. Additional meetings were held during January, February, March, May, and June 2018. These stakeholders included community-based organizations that represent protected classes, housing developers, social services organizations, government agencies, fair housing groups, legal services providers, researchers, and others. Stakeholders expressed great concern about the lack of affordable housing and the difficulties of accessing housing. Additional concerns were raised about barriers to housing. One major theme that emerged is that community opposition to building housing is a pervasive problem in Contra Costa County. Other issues include displacement, a lack of regional cooperation, a lack of coordination between government agencies, difficulties in navigating affordable housing options, disparities between different regions of the county, restrictive land-use and zoning laws that prevent housing from being built, and the need for more tenant protections such as source of income anti-discrimination laws. Transportation, especially the lack of adequate transit, also emerged as a critical issue affecting housing and access to opportunity. Numerous stakeholders also stressed the need to provide more services for the homeless population and increase housing assistance to help marginalized groups such as persons with disabilities, low-income seniors, the LGBTQ community (especially LGBTQ seniors), and immigrants. Below is a list of stakeholders consulted: Bridge Housing Contra Costa Interfaith Housing National Housing Law Project Contra Costa Association of Realtors Bay Area Legal Aid East Bay Housing Organization Public Interest Law Project ECHO Fair Housing 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 24 of ? Raise the Roof Coalition Contra Cota Senior Legal Services NAMI of Contra Costa County Non-Profit Housing Association of Northern California Shelter, Inc. Greenbelt Alliance Eden Housing Rainbow Community Center Housing and Economic Rights Advocates (HERA) Bay Area Metro (ABAG and MTC) NAACP Richmond, CA Branch Communities for a Better Environment Ensuring Opportunity Contra Costa Health Services Contra Costa County Health, Housing, and Homeless Services Contra Costa Sustainability Coordinator Contra Costa Department of Conservation and Development Contra Costa Alcohol and Other Drugs Program Services Pacific Community Services Community Meetings The final Analysis of Impediments also reflects two rounds of community meetings, each round held at three separate locations across the county. In June 2018, three community meetings were held in the eastern, central, and western regions of Contra Costa County as part of the first phase of public meetings for the AI process. These meetings were located at Richmond City Hall, Concord City Hall, and Antioch City Hall. Attendees at each meeting learned about the Analysis of Impediments process and shared their experiences with fair housing issues. The meetings provided important insights into the problems that communities in Contra Costa County face with fair housing. The primary concern residents expressed at all three community meetings is a lack of affordability in Contra Costa and the Bay Area. Residents spoke about the negative financial and social impact of high housing costs as well as displacement due to the lack of affordable housing. In all three meetings, numerous residents voiced concerns about problems with transportation including high commuting costs and inadequate transit service. Economic development concerns were also raised in all of the meetings. More specific issues were also raised in each meeting. In Concord, residents expressed concern about whether affordable housing was being distributed fairly across communities in Contra Costa, being unable to afford housing near jobs, tenant protections, and the treatment of the Latino population in the city. Participants in Richmond discussed environmental problems as well as the lingering effects of the foreclosure crisis on both homeowners and 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 25 of ? renters. In Antioch, residents expressed worries over the difficulty of finding housing with a Housing Choice Voucher and overcrowding due to high rent burdens. Below is a list of the June 2018 community meetings. Concord June 25, 2018 Richmond June 27, 2018 Antioch June 28, 2018 An additional round of public meetings was held after the Draft Analysis of Impediments was posted for public review and comment. These meetings took place on the following dates: Richmond March 4 Pittsburg March 5 Concord March 7 Attendees at these meetings raised a number of concerns regarding fair housing and related issues in the region. These included the importance of high quality “customer service” and responsiveness by the housing authorities to landlords, in order to help address the reluctance of landlords to rent to voucher holders; the difficulty of securing housing following an eviction; and the severity and variety of cumulative health risks in low-income neighborhoods. Publicly Supported Housing-Specific Meetings It was determined by HCP, PRRAC, and Consortium housing authority staff that PSH-specific input sessions should be held at public housing communities and with Housing Choice Voucher program participants and landlords throughout the Consortium region. Initially, three meetings were scheduled in June of 2018 with limited outreach to a select group of individuals, held at HACCC offices in Martinez, CA, and at Antioch City Hall during the weekday. This proved to be unsuccessful in garnering participation, and so additional meetings were set at public housing developments and at city halls during non-working hours. The meetings were publicized through the housing authorities’ contact lists, including targeted community outreach at the developments themselves. Meetings were held at the following HACCC public housing developments: Bayo Vista, Rodeo, CA August 18, 2018 Kidd Manor, San Pablo, CA August 18, 2018 El Pueblo, Pittsburg, CA August 19, 2018 Elder Winds, Pittsburg, CA August 19, 2018 Public housing residents at all locations expressed concerns regarding lack of public transportation near their communities and feelings of isolation in the larger community. Environmental and health concerns were also expressed, particularly in Bayo Vista, which is situated close to industrial oil refineries near San Pablo Bay, and Kidd Manor, which is located 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 26 of ? in a community that was observed to be isolated from the nearby community at the end of a street surrounded by vacant lots. Lack of access to services for individuals with disabilities was also a prevalent concern, particularly in the Kidd Manor and Elder Winds communities, both housing primarily senior residents. Long waitlists for transfers and lack of choice on where to move should a resident need or wish to were also common concerns. Residents of both Kidd Manor and Elder Winds expressed concerns regarding possible differences in HACCC program offerings for senior residents among different developments, although this was not able to be substantiated. However, consultants did recognize a visual difference in the overall maintenance and aesthetic of these two properties, with Kidd Manor seeming to be less serviced in garbage pickup, landscaping, and exterior maintenance than Elder Winds. Residents at all communities expressed concerns regarding unresponsive property managers and maintenance staff. HCV program participant meetings were held at the following: Richmond City Hall August 20, 2018 Antioch City Hall August 21, 2018 Primary concerns from HCV participants centered around discrimination against voucher holders in the private rental market throughout the county and an overall lack of affordable units available to voucher participants. A number of participants underscored the difficulty of renting with a voucher in the Consortium area due to landlords’ unwillingness to take part in the program, pointing to inaccurate, discriminatory stigmas of participants, as well as lack of PHA customer service for landlords as some reasons for this. Participants also conveyed concerns regarding information on available units provided by the PHAs, in particular the usage of GoSection8 for listings, and the lack of unit listings available on the platform in neighborhoods close to good schools, job centers, and/or public transportation. Discrimination against Spanish-speaking voucher holders was also a concern. Spanish- speaking participants predominantly stated concerns of being taken advantage of by landlords, including demands of cash payments in addition to rent and other fraudulent behaviors. Participants stated the difficulty in navigating the HCV program, with children often needed to translate documents or PHA communications for parents. Email comments Stakeholders were also provided the opportunity to submit comments via email. Comments received emphasized the high cost of housing in the region. Commenters also noted inconsistencies in compliance with reasonable accommodations procedures for public housing residents, the need for tenant protections such as just cause evictions and rent control ordinances, the importance of informing public officials and the general public 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 27 of ? regarding the Right to a Safe Home Act (which expanded protections against evictions or other penalties for victims of crimes or those in need of emergency services), and the need to assess the impact of restrictive criminal background screenings on housing access. Commenters also emphasized the importance of compliance with Language Access Plans by all entities. Comments also stated the need for additional supportive housing in Contra Costa County. Survey In addition, the Contra Costa Consortium and PHA Analysis of Impediments process used a survey to gather additional information about fair housing and related issues from the public. The survey was made available in English and Spanish. Two hundred and ninety-seven respondents completed the survey. Approximately 60% of survey respondents lived in single- family homes, with the remainder in condominiums or apartments; approximately 6% of respondents lived in publicly supported housing or currently had a Housing Choice Voucher. When asked, “If you have used a Housing Choice Voucher (portable “Section 8”), how much difficulty have you had finding a landlord to rent to you with the voucher?”, twenty five respondents noted that they had faced some or a lot of difficulty, or difficulty in some neighborhoods, while 11 stated that they had not faced difficulty. Increasing housing cost was an issue many respondents found salient. 35% said that their own housing costs had increased “a lot” while 36% said housing costs had “increased some” over the past three years. Sixty five percent said that affordable options in their neighborhood had decreased over the past five years. Of those who responded to the question whether they had been displaced (“had to move when you didn’t want to”) within the past ten years, approximately half of those who were renters answered yes, and 21 out of 160 owners said yes. Of those who answered yes, 34% also said yes when asked “did you have trouble finding safe, quality housing that you could afford in a neighborhood you would like to live in.” 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 28 of ? Chapter 3. Assessment of Past Goals and Actions 3.1 Fair Housing Goals in Recent Analysis of Impediments The following table outlines the goals identified by the Consortium in its 2016 AI. Table 3 – 2015-2020 Goals, Contra Costa Analysis Of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice Action Steps Responsibility Complete Deliverable Comments Goal # 1: Increase Public Awareness of Fair Housing Rights a) Contract with Fair Housing Services or consultant(s) to educate County residents, tenants, and owners and agents of rental properties regarding their fair housing rights and responsibilities Consortium members 2017 Service contracts with each jurisdiction of the Consortium; assignments related to standardizing public information materials Countywide Expect to renew contracts every fiscal year; plan joint semiannual meetings with fair housing providers b) Update existing guidance on fair housing rights to include recent changes in protected classes and equal access Fair Housing Services 2017 Content for website and brochures with consistent message and inclusive delivery Refer to HUD Exchange for updated guidance and coordinate content production from County c) Promote and coordinate expansion of outreach to the community regarding fair housing rights Consortium Lead 2018 Campaign to highlight the single toll-free telephone number for fair housing services; strategies to jurisdictions and pre- prepared content for trade publications Involve Home Builders, Realtors, Property Management Association, and small landlords d) Diversify form and content of outreach Fair Housing Services 2019 Alternatives to traditional fair housing outreach that reach different populations or present a fresh way of sharing information; also, develop a LAP Collect best practices & outcomes to share with grantees. (This will be ongoing and updates will be provided annually in CAPER.) Goal # 2: Improve and Better Utilize Financial Assistance for Housing a) Continue to support and expand development of new affordable housing and preservation of existing affordable housing, which include the CDBG, HOME, and HOPWA Programs Consortium members 2017 Action Plan budget allocation percentages maintained with minimum reduction; project selection criteria that relate to new State resources, e.g. Housing Trust Fund and Rapid Rehousing Coordinate funding levels from within the Consortium and CCD Lead report performance in CAPER; improve efficiencies through innovative housing options, e.g., tiny homes & accessory dwelling units 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 29 of ? Action Steps Responsibility Complete Deliverable Comments b) Publicize information about housing assistance programs, especially rental assistance with referral feature for available housing Consortium Lead 2017 Annual update/ distribution of material; update County website list of subsidized rental housing; maintain interactive map of affordable rental units Include information rental assistance programs; create list of realtors, brokers, banks, credit unions etc c) Continue to fund agencies that facilitate tenant/landlord dispute resolution or other dispute resolution services Consortium members 2017 Reduced evictions and greater lease renewals Collect and monitor data on tenant rent increases; promote rights of protected classes and equal access d) Diversify information on the availability of home financing and rental subsidy programs Consortium members 2018 Expanded multi-lingual services and outreach to special needs population and the organizations that serve these populations Ensure website and social media has all materials in Spanish that serve these populations (will be necessary to establish best modes of outreach and coordination) Goal # 3: Review Home Purchase Loan Denial Figures with Local Lenders a) Require their respective fair housing consultant(s) to review and monitor HMDA data in regards to loan denial rates among racial/ethnic minorities Consortium members 2017 Reports of any disparate impacts between racial and ethnic minorities to Consortium members and possible enforcement action Refer cases as appropriate to State and Federal complaint centers b) Support consumer credit and homebuyer education programs to educate borrowers about perils of subprime lending Consortium members 2019 Expanded course curriculum In addition to current counseling agencies, interest other agencies in these deliveries c) Utilize preapproved lenders and encourage them to examine loan approval policies and procedures Consortium members 2017 Documentation of review by lenders Include established networks such as the Home Equity Preservation Alliance; indicate what affirmative steps lenders might take to address this apparent issue d) Prefer lenders with Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) rating of “Outstanding” when selecting participants of first-time homebuyer programs Consortium members 2018 Review of CRA rating reports In addition, review lenders most recent HMDA reporting published by Federal Finan- cial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) Goal # 4: Increase Access to Special Needs Housing a) Adopt formal policies and procedures, in jurisdictions that have none, for persons with disabilities to request reasonable accommodations to local planning and development standards Consortium members 2017 New appeals process within jurisdictions that presently do not offer such protection Gather more information to determine extent to which the available supply of supportive housing is limited particularly for individuals with physical and mental disabilities; use County policy as model for other jurisdictions 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 30 of ? Action Steps Responsibility Complete Deliverable Comments b) Promote best practices for alternative types of special needs/elderly housing and considering policy changes Consortium members 2017 Prototypes of housing designs that permit vulnerable populations to gain access, receive services/ age in place (this includes develop-ment of accessory dwelling units by reducing fees for new units), placement services for seniors, and expanded use of VASH vouchers Reflect changes in plans, program descriptions and funding requests for CoC, PHA, etc. (Also, follow new State legislation to further encourage accessory dwelling units) c) Educate tenants, and owners and agents of rental properties Fair Housing Service Providers 2018 Targeted outreach to property owners and representatives that have not received past notification Include landlords and small property owners with scattered site units Goal # 5: Review Municipalities Planning Code and Publicize Incentives a) Examine the review & approval process to identify opportunities to streamline and simplify action on affordable projects Consortium members 2018 Report recommending possible changes in zoning, land use and building permit issuance Confer with both planners, developers and builders b) Publicize the density bonus ordinance and encourage developers to utilize the ordinance in order to create affordable housing Consortium lead 2018 Media campaign to draw attention to recent successes in the region (e.g. as a 25% parking reduction permitted with the inclusion of very low Income rental housing units); updates of promotional material and outreach strategies Track progress to determine whether further changes are necessary in other jurisdictions and promote consideration of similar incentives c) Develop policy for priority review to affordable housing projects as needed Consortium members 2019 Model development codes, including one adopted recently in the region which streamlines the review process for many types of development; facilitate information sharing & networking among municipalities Compile best practices from other states, ask APA and ICMA for best practices 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 31 of ? 3.2 Progress Toward Goals Contra Costa County Contra Costa County reported the following fair housing progress in its 2017-18 CAPER:1 Recommendation # 1: Increase Public Awareness of Fair Housing Rights. The County and the Consortium cities continue to provide CDBG support to agencies to provide Fair Housing consulting services. Fair housing service providers and their partner agencies continue to expand outreach to the community regarding fair housing rights. Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity (ECHO) is one example of a service provider that conducted fair housing trainings and outreach at 16 non-profit agencies throughout the County. This outreach was focused on low-income communities and described their services and contact information. Many of these communities contain a significant number of Spanish- speaking and other non- English speaking residents. Recommendation # 2: Improve Financial Assistance for Housing. The County and cities continue to collaborate to expand affordable housing in communities where such opportunities are limited. The County and many of the Consortium cities have continued to allocate resources to encourage and facilitate the development of affordable housing throughout the entire Consortium, resulting in the development of new affordable housing. Additionally, provisions were made for a single-family rehabilitation program, first-time homebuyer programs, and fair housing counseling, legal service and outreach. In addition, the County continues to provide CDBG financial support for tenant/landlord services for low- income residents of the County. Lastly, the County’s Mortgage Credit Certificate program reserves 40 percent of its allocation for households with incomes at or below 80 percent of the area median income. Lenders have cooperated with the program, and 10 Mortgage Credit Certificates were provided to low-income households. Recommendation # 3: Review Home Purchase Loan Denial Figures with Local Lenders. The County and the Consortium cities have incorporated in the CDBG contracts with their respective Fair Housing consulting agencies a review and monitoring of HMDA data in regard to loan denial rates among racial/ethnic minorities. The agencies will provide an update of their reviews of this information in quarterly reports and in quarterly meetings with the County and Consortium cities. Recommendation # 4: Increase Access to Special Needs Housing. The County and the Consortium cities will inform its Fair Housing services providers to incorporate education and information to tenant, owners, and agents of rental properties about the necessity to provide equal access to housing to special needs populations. 1 Available at: http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/47019/FY-201718-Consolidated- Annual-Performance-and-Evaluation-Report-CAPER?bidId=. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 32 of ? Recommendation #5: Review Municipalities Planning Code and Offer Incentives. This recommendation is a long-term goal and the County will begin developing steps to implement this recommendation. However, the County has continued its efforts to remove or ameliorate public policies within County code that negatively impact affordable housing development in the County including the following: through the Density Bonus Ordinance, the County is required to grant one density bonus and incentives or concessions when an applicant for a housing development seeks and agrees to construct a housing development, excluding any units permitted by the density bonus that will contain at least one of the following: ten percent of the for lower income households; five percent of the total units for very low income households; a senior citizen housing development, or a mobile home park that limits residency based on age requirements for housing older persons; or ten percent of the total dwelling units in a common interest development for persons and families of moderate income, provided that all units in the development are offered to the public for purchase. The Inclusionary Housing Ordinance requires all developers of five or more units to provide 15 percent of the units at affordable costs to moderate, low or very-low income households depending on the type of project. Developers may pay a fee in lieu of providing the affordable units. The County will review and develop new regulations to permit the development of agriculturally related structures on agriculturally zoned land without a use permit in order to encourage the provision of onsite farmworker housing Antioch The City of Antioch reported in its 2017-18 CAPER that: For the past two years, it has urged nonprofits to engage in greater outreach to the Hispanic community in order to encourage greater participation in government service programs— generally resulting in increased outreach efforts, but “with declining success.”2 Additionally, while Antioch reported significant new outreach programming for people experiencing homelessness (as well as production of additional housing units), it also faces a severe continuing lack of available funding and services to support this population. It is in the process of developing a First Time Homebuyer program, which will encompass outreach to and participation by voucher holders. It amended its zoning ordinance to allow for additional high-density development and greater ease of such development in designated areas.3 It supported the activities of ECHO housing, which has engaged in testing, audits, public education and outreach (in English and Spanish) within the city4. 2 City of Antioch 2017-18 CAPER at 7, available at https://www.antiochca.gov/fc/cdbg/FY-2017-18-CAPER.pdf. 3 Id. at 17-18. 4 Id. at 24. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 33 of ? It updated its fair housing guidance to include additional protected classes and equal access. It diversified its fair housing outreach activities, using a range of media. Concord The City of Concord undertook the following fair housing activities (as reported in its 2017-18 CAPER): Concord contracts with Hello Housing, a non-profit housing agency, to administer the City’s Housing Conservation Program, which provides grants and loans for home repairs to low- income homeowners of single-family homes and mobile homes. The Concord Reuse Plan Area Plan includes a commitment toward affordable housing with a stated requirement of 25 percent of the overall units (12,200) targeted as affordable. At the end of 2016, Concord City Council selected community members to serve on a newly-formed CNWS Community Advisory Committee (CAC). The purpose of this committee is to serve as an advisory body to provide input and encourage public participation during the development of a Specific Plan. The following key milestones must be reached before development can begin on the former CNWS: property conveyance from the Navy to the City, Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA), Specific Plan and Infrastructure Master Plan, and permitting. Progress toward receiving a variety of permits required for site development continues, including Environmental Permitting, National Historic Preservation, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Federal Clean Water Act (Section 404). Once these major activities are complete, site development can begin. Development is anticipated to begin in 2019 or 2020. During this funding year, the Contra Costa Housing Authority agreed to prioritize qualified homeless individuals for Housing Choice Vouchers. Local agencies are working with property managers across the County to house these individuals. Concord contracts with Hello Housing to assist qualified low-and moderate-income individuals with the purchase of their first home. FTHB loan funds are to assist with down payment and/or closing costs. Households earning at or below 60 percent of AMI are eligible for up to a $40,000 loan, while those earning between 61 percent and 80 percent of AMI are eligible for up to a $30,000 loan. ECHO housing and its partner agencies spoke at and distributed fair housing literature at events throughout the City. Outreach was focused on low income communities, many with significant numbers of Spanish speaking and other non-English speaking residents. As the City’s Fair Housing provider, ECHO Housing opened 39 cases with the following results: 16 cases were counseled, six cases were investigated, three cases no evidence found, one case landlord was provided with training, 12 cases pending. Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 34 of ? The City of Pittsburg reported that it has: Engaged in outreach to the homeless population regarding available services, including those provided in coordination with the County.5 Engaged in outreach regarding its First Time Homebuyers program.6 Walnut Creek As reported in its 2017-18 CAPER, the City of Walnut Creek undertook the following fair housing activities: The City continued funding ECHO Housing, a HUD approved housing counseling agency, which opened 15 cases this year and conducted a 5-site fair housing audit. Results from the audit will be shared in September, 2018. ECHO Housing has distributed over 1,000 flyers in English and Spanish to Walnut Creek based agencies. They conducted fair housing trainings and outreach for several organizations and property management groups. ECHO also receives funding for its Tenant/Landlord program to help mediate disputes and provide education, which may help reduce evictions and unreasonable rent increases. The City continues to implement its Reasonable Accommodation Ordinance, which one household took advantage of this year. It also adopted a new zoning ordinance for Accessory Dwelling Units effective October 2017 that includes state requirements. It continues to implement the Blueprint for Success to further streamline and simplify action on all housing projects, including affordable housing, and expedites review of affordable housing projects. The City has a consultant working on updating its Density Bonus ordinance, and held two stakeholder outreach meetings in summer/fall 2018. 5 City of Pittsburg 2017-18 CAPER at 8. 6 Id. at 28. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 35 of ? Chapter 4. Fair Housing Analysis 4.1 Demographic Profile Summary This Demographic Summary provides an overview of data concerning race and ethnicity, sex, familial status, disability status, limited English proficiency, national origin, and age. The data discussed below reflects the composition of the Region, Contra Costa County, and each of the four CD entitlement cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. In addition to capturing current conditions, the data reflects change over time in the nearly three decades since the 1990 Census. The data and analysis in the succeeding sections of this Analysis build upon the foundation laid in this section and, at times, refer back to this section. Demographic Patterns Since 1990 Contra Costa County The two tables of data (see appendix, Tables 1 & 2), provided by HUD, describes Contra Costa in regional context. The region (designated by HUD) includes the counties of San Francisco, Alameda, Marin, Contra Costa, and San Mateo. Together, these are known as the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Metropolitan Area, or the “Region.” Race is defined by the Census Bureau as a person’s self-identification with one or more social groups. An individual can report as White, Black or African American, Asian, American Indian and Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, or some other race. Survey respondents may report multiple races. Ethnicity determines whether a person is of Hispanic origin or not. For this reason, ethnicity is broken out in two categories, Hispanic or Latino and Not Hispanic or Latino. Hispanics may report as any race. In all of the tables (see appendix), the Race groupings include only those who report that they are NOT of Hispanic origin. Those of Hispanic origin are reported under the Race groupings as Hispanic. Hispanic includes people of any of the races above. Race and Ethnicity The Contra Costa County Consortium (“the County” or “the Consortium”), which consists of the entirety of Contra Costa County, is a large, diverse jurisdiction in which people of color comprise a majority of the population. As of the 2010 Census, 47.75 percent of residents were non-Hispanic Whites, 8.92 percent of residents were non-Hispanic Blacks, 24.36 percent were Hispanics, 14.61 percent were non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders, 0.28 percent were non-Hispanic Native Americans, 3.77 percent were non-Hispanic multiracial individuals, and 0.30 percent identified as some other race. As discussed in the Segregation/Integration 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 36 of ? section of this Assessment, diversity and integration are not synonymous, and the County has areas of racial and ethnic concentration as well as more integrated cities and neighborhoods. The racial and ethnic demographics of the County are similar to but not identical to those of the broader San-Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, California Metropolitan Statistical Area (“the Region”). Overall, the County is slightly more heavily non-Hispanic White and slightly more heavily Hispanic than the Region. The Region is more heavily non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander than the County. For all other racial or ethnic groups, the demographics of the County and the Region mirror each other. National Origin The ten most common national origins in the County are, from most populous to least populous, Mexico, Philippines, China (excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan),7 India, El Salvador, Korea, Vietnam, Iran, Hong Kong, and Guatemala. Mexican-Americans and Filipino-Americans are, by far the two most populous national origin groups in the County, with a combined population that is greater than the combined population of the other eight most populous national origin groups. The representation of national origin groups in the broader Region is similar though with minor differences. Iranian-Americans, the eighth most populous national origin group in the County, is not among the ten largest groups in the Region, and Taiwanese- Americans are the tenth most populous group in the Region despite not being among the ten most populous groups in the County. Other salient differences between the County and the Region are consistent with the higher proportion of Asians and Pacific Islanders in the Region than in the County discussed above. In particular, the percentages of individuals of Chinese national origin (excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan) and Vietnamese national origin in the Region far exceed those in the County. Limited English Proficiency The ten most commonly spoken first languages of individuals with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) in the County are, from most populous to least populous, Spanish, Chinese, Tagalog, Korean, Persian, Vietnamese, Other Indic Language, Other Asian Language, Russian, and Portuguese. With the exceptions of Russian and Portuguese, these languages mirror the most commonly spoken languages in the ten most common countries of origin discussed above. As with national origin, the differences between the County and the Region are minor and primarily relate to the greater Asian or Pacific Islander population of the Region outside of the County. For the Region, Japanese replaces Portuguese as the tenth most commonly spoken first language of LEP individuals, and, although Chinese is the second most commonly spoken first language for LEP individuals in both the County and the Region, the percentage of Chinese speaking LEP individuals is significantly higher in the Region than in the County. 7 This exclusion is based on HUD’s provided data. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 37 of ? Disability The most common types of disabilities experienced by County residents closely mirror those in the Region as a whole. Ambulatory difficulties are the most common type of disability followed by, in order of, independent living difficulties, cognitive difficulties, hearing difficulties, self-care difficulties, and vision difficulties. For four out of the six types of disabilities, there were greater concentrations of persons with those disabilities in the County than in the Region. In no case did the percentage of individuals with a particular type of disability deviate by more than 0.27 percent, suggesting that the population of persons with disabilities in the County is generally similar to that of the Region. Data from the 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates generally confirms this point while adding an additional dimension to the discussion. Eleven percent of the total civilian noninstitutionalized population of the County has a disability as opposed to 9.9 percent of the population of the Region. This small but real difference suggests that fewer people in the County have multiple disabilities than in the Region. Sex In the County, 51.24 percent of residents are female while 48.76 percent are male. The population is slightly more heavily female than in the Region as a whole where 50.69 percent of the population is female and 49.31 percent is male. Age The County has a significantly higher percentage of children than does the Region as a whole, a slightly lower yet similar percentage of elderly residents, and a significantly lower percentage of working age adults. The higher representation of children is consistent with the County’s housing stock, which has a higher proportion of detached single-family homes and thus a higher average number of bedrooms per unit. Familial Status Consistent with the County’s younger population as discussed above, a higher percentage of households in the County consists of families with children than in the Region as a whole. Since 1990, the County’s non-Hispanic White population has decreased slightly in number while decreasing significantly as a percentage of the total population. The Black population has increased slightly in number while remaining flat as a percentage of the overall population. In the meanwhile, both the Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander populations have increased substantially both in number and as percentages of the entire population. There has not been a clear trend with respect to the County’s small Native American population. It is important to note that growth in the Black population was most pronounced between 1990 and 2000, becoming much flatter since. Longitudinal trends with respect to all racial or ethnic groups except Blacks in the Region match those for the County. Regionally, from 1990 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 38 of ? to the present the Black population has declined both in number (by 61,542) and as a percentage of the total population. This trend almost exclusively reflects the displacement of Blacks from the Cities of Oakland and San Francisco. Between 1990 and the present, the Black population of Oakland dropped by 52,192, and the Black population of San Francisco decreased by 29,366. Although some Black households have been displaced from those central cities to other communities within the Region, some have left the Region entirely. The number and proportion of the population of both the County and the Region comprised of foreign-born individuals and LEP individuals, which are often but not always closely linked to each other, have risen significantly and consistently since 1990. The rate of increase has been higher in the County than in the Region, albeit starting from lower baseline populations of foreign-born individuals and LEP individuals. There has been little change in the proportion of the population by sex in either the County or the Region since 1990. The elderly population has increased consistently since 1990 in both the County and the Region while the youth population increased between 1990 and 2000 before decreasing since 2000. Meanwhile, the working age adult population decreased between 1990 and 2000 but has increased since 2000. The proportion of families with children followed a similar trend to the youth population in both the County and the Region, rising between 1990 and 2000 before falling between 2000 and the present. Antioch Race and Ethnicity The racial and ethnic composition of the City of Antioch diverges significantly from those of the County and the Region and has changed significantly over time. In particular, the City of Antioch has much higher Black and Hispanic population concentrations than both the County and the Region and lower non-Hispanic White and Asian or Pacific Islander population concentrations. The Native American population concentration is also slightly higher. Trends in Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander population over time roughly mirror those in the County and the Region despite a slightly faster rate of Hispanic population growth than in the Region and a lower baseline Asian or Pacific Islander population in 1990. The growth in the Black population, however, stands in stark contrast to a County with flat Black population and a region with declining Black population. The City of Antioch accounts for a majority of total Black population growth in the County since 1990. Although the decline in the percentage of non-Hispanic White residents in the City of Antioch appears to be consistent over time, the reasons for this decline do not stay consistent. It appears that the decline in the White population share between 1990 and 2000 was primarily the result of an increasing overall population driven by people of color moving into the City of Antioch. However, the decline since 2000 may be more properly attributed to White Flight. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 39 of ? National Origin In the City of Antioch, as in the City of Concord, Mexico and the Philippines are the two most common reported national origins. Unlike in the City of Concord, Antioch is actually more heavily Filipino American than the Region as a whole. The percentage of the population that is Mexican American is slightly lower in the City of Antioch than it is in the City of Concord while remaining higher than in the County and the Region. The population of other East Asian national origin groups is generally lower than in the County and the Region. Like in the City of Concord, the Afghan population is somewhat higher than in the County and the Region. There is also a notable population of individuals of Fijian national origin in the City of Antioch. The City of Antioch is more heavily Nicaraguan American than both the County and the Region. Over time, the percentage of the population of the City of Antioch that is foreign born has grown more rapidly than in the County and the Region but remains lower than in the County and the Region by virtue of starting at a lower baseline in 1990. Limited English Proficiency As in the City of Concord, the most spoken language by LEP individuals is Spanish, but, in light of the somewhat larger Filipino American population, the percentage of Tagalog speaking LEP individuals is higher than the percentage of Chinese speaking LEP persons. Similar to in the City of Concord, the City of Antioch has a higher percentage of Persian speaking LEP individuals than the County and the Region. The City of Antioch has small but notable populations of LEP speakers of African languages, Hindi, and Arabic. Over time, the percentage of LEP individuals in the City of Antioch has increased more rapidly than in the County and the Region but remains lower by virtue of starting from a lower baseline in 1990. Sex In the City of Antioch, the percentage of the population that is female exceeds that of the County and the Region, and the trend over time, also in contrast to the County and the Region, has been toward a more heavily female population. The City’s increasing Black population share may partially explain this trend. As of the 2012-2016 ACS 5-Year Estimates, 52.1 percent of Black residents in the Region were female as opposed to just 50.7 percent of all residents of the Region. Age The City of Antioch has had a much higher share of children residing within its boundaries than either the County or the Region and a lower share of elderly individuals since 1990. The City of Antioch follows the same broad regional trend of increasing youth population (and declining working age adult population) between 1990 and 2000 followed by a reversal of that pattern. The elderly population has undergone slow but steady growth, albeit from a lower baseline than in the County and the Region. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 40 of ? Familial Status The representation of families with children in the City of Antioch broadly mirrors that of the youth population, starting at a high baseline in 1990 and increasing slightly in the lead-up to 2000 before falling since. The percentage of households in the City of Antioch that are families with children remains higher than the percentages in the County and the Region. Disability The City of Antioch has higher concentrations of persons with disabilities across all categories than both the County and the Region. The gap is particularly large for persons with cognitive disabilities. This data raises questions about whether there may be concentrations of congregate settings for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the City of Antioch, such as group homes, because of the combination of relatively low housing costs combined with a concentration of detached single-family homes. Concord Race and Ethnicity Non-Hispanic Whites make up a bare majority of the population of the City of Concord, which is a slightly higher concentration of non-Hispanic Whites than in the County or the Region but a significantly lower percentage than in 1990. The City of Concord has undergone more rapid demographic change than the surrounding areas due to significant increases in the Hispanic population from just 11.36 percent in 1990 to 30.3 percent currently. Black and Asian or Pacific Islander populations have increased in the City of Concord, albeit from low baseline levels and, in the case of the Asian or Pacific Islander population, at a slower rate than in the County and the Region. At its peak in 2000, the City of Concord had a somewhat higher Native American population concentration than both the County and the Region. Native American population followed the same broader trend, which is also observable nationwide, of increasing between 1990 and 2000 before decreasing between 2000 and 2010. National Origin Mexico is, by far, the most common country of origin for individuals in the City of Concord with a reported national origin, and the concentration of Mexican Americans is higher in the City of Concord than in either the County or the Region. For other national origin groups, with the exception of individuals with Salvador, Guatemalan, or Afghan ancestry, concentrations in the City of Concord are generally lower than in the County and the Region. This is broadly consistent with the high concentration of Hispanics in the City of Concord as discussed above. Filipino Americans are the most highly represented Asian or Pacific Islander national origin group, comprising only a slightly lower population of the City of Concord than of the Region, while the concentration of Chinese American individuals is far lower in the City of Concord than in the Region and slightly lower than in the County. Overall, the foreign-born population of the City of Concord has increased significantly between 1990 and the present, drawing near to but not quite reaching regional levels. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 41 of ? Limited English Proficiency Consistent with the data concerning national origin, Spanish is, by far, the most commonly spoken language among LEP individuals in the City of Concord. Notably, the percentage of LEP individuals who speak Chinese is higher than the percentage who speak Tagalog, suggesting that Chinese Americans in the City of Concord are more likely to be immigrants or first-generation Americans than are Filipino Americans in the City of Concord. Russian is the fourth most commonly spoken language among LEP individuals. The LEP population of the City of Concord has increased rapidly since 1990, nearly reaching regional levels. Sex The population of the City of Concord is more heavily male than both the County and the Region, but that was not the case in 1990. The City of Concord has had more change in the distribution of its population by sex than surrounding areas, perhaps as a result of the significant increase in the Hispanic population. In the Region, according to the 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, 50.8 percent of Hispanics in the Region were male. Age The City of Concord has consistently had a higher concentration of working age adults and a lower concentration of children than the County over time, with the elderly population similar though slightly lower in the City of Concord. The age distribution of the population of the City of Concord is more similar to that of the Region as a whole than it is to the County. As in the County and the Region, the population of children increased between 1990 and 2000 before falling since 2000, and the population of working age adults followed the opposite trajectory. The elderly population grew somewhat more rapidly in Concord than it did in the County and the Region. Familial Status Families with children comprise a smaller percentage of households in the City of Concord than they do in the County and a similar percentage to that which they make up in the region. This represents a significant change from 1990 when there was a higher concentration of families with children in the City of Concord than in both the County and the Region. Disability Similar to in the County, the percentages of persons with hearing, vision, cognitive, and ambulatory disabilities in the City of Concord exceed those of the Region while the percentages of persons with self-care and independent living disabilities trail those of the Region. The split is more extreme than in the County with the City of Concord having higher concentrations of persons with the former four types of disabilities than the County and lower concentrations of persons with the latter two types of disabilities. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 42 of ? Pittsburg Race and Ethnicity The City of Pittsburg is much more heavily Black and Hispanic and has a far lower non- Hispanic White population share than the County and the Region. Over time, the percentage of the population that is Hispanic has grown significantly while the percentage of the population that is Asian or Pacific Islander has increased at a more modest rate. Black population growth has been relatively stagnant, and the non-Hispanic White population share has decreased precipitously. Although the City of Pittsburg has experienced some population growth since 1990, that growth has been much more modest than in neighboring Antioch. The existing concentration of Black population in Pittsburg in 1990 stands in stark contrast to the City of Antioch, which went from having a very small Black population to one of the largest in the Region in the space of two decades. Trends with respect to the Native American population, which is slightly more concentrated in the City of Pittsburg than in the County and the Region though not to as great of an extent as in the Cities of Antioch and Concord, mirror those found at every level of geography in the Region. National Origin Data with respect to national origin in the City of Pittsburg largely mirrors the plurality Hispanic demographics of the City of Pittsburg with higher concentrations of persons of Mexican, Salvadoran, Nicaraguan, Peruvian, and Honduran national origin than in the County and the Region. Individuals of Filipino national origin comprise, by far, the largest Asian or Pacific Islander national origin group, and relatively few people of Chinese national origin reside in the City of Pittsburg in comparison to the Region. The percentage of residents who are foreign born has increased at a slightly faster rate than in the Region and at a slightly slower rate than in the County. The 1990 baseline for the foreign born population was higher than elsewhere in the County but slightly lower than in the Region. Limited English Proficiency As in the Cities of Antioch and Concord, the most common spoken language for LEP individuals is Spanish, followed by Tagalog. Other languages, especially Chinese, are generally less commonly spoken in the City of Pittsburg than they are in the County and in the Region as a whole. In 1990, the percentage of residents of the City of Pittsburg comprised of LEP individuals was lower than that in the Region. Since, it has grown to be larger than in the Region. The percentage of LEP individuals is higher than in other cities in the County like the Cities of Antioch and Concord that have experienced significant growth in their LEP populations. Sex As in the City of Antioch, the long-term trend with respect to the composition of the population by sex has cut in the opposite direction of the Region as a whole with the percentage of residents who are female increasing over time. As of 1990, like in the City of 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 43 of ? Antioch, the population of the City of Pittsburg was followed a roughly similar trend to the Region, with women outnumbering men. Age The City of Pittsburg has a much higher share of children and lower shares of working age adults and elderly individuals than does the Region. Compared to the County as a whole, the City of Pittsburg has a higher number of children and a lower proportion of elderly individuals, but the share of working age adults is higher. Over time, the pattern in the age distribution of the City of Pittsburg has largely mirrored that of the Region, the County, and the other cities: the youth population concentration grew between 1990 and 2000 before decreasing since, the working age adult population share decreased between 1990 and 2000 before increasing since, and there was modest but consistent growth in the elderly population concentration. Familial Status The percentage of households that is comprises of families with children is higher in the City of Pittsburg than it is in the Region. The percentage has decreased since 1990 despite the trend in the Region being flat. The representation of families with children in the City of Pittsburg is similar to that in the City of Antioch. Disability The population of persons with disabilities in the City of Pittsburg closely mirrors those of the City of Antioch. The percentages of residents with all listed types of disabilities are higher in the City of Pittsburg than they are in the County. With the exception of persons with hearing disabilities, the percentages of persons with disabilities by type of disability are higher across all other types of disabilities in the City of Pittsburg than they are in the City of Antioch. Walnut Creek Race and Ethnicity The City of Walnut Creek has a population that is significantly more heavily non-Hispanic White than that of the County, the Region, and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, and Pittsburg. The City of Walnut Creek’s Black and Hispanic population concentrations are significantly lower than in the County, the Region, and the Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg. The City of Walnut Creek’s Hispanic population share is significantly lower than in the City of Concord, but the Black population concentration in the City of Concord is only slightly higher than in the City of Walnut Creek. The percentage of residents of the City of Walnut Creek who are Asian or Pacific Islander is similar to that in the County and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, and Pittsburg. Like the County and those cities, the percentage of residents who are Asian or Pacific Islander is significantly lower than in the Region as a whole. The Native American population share in the City of Walnut Creek is lower than in the Region, the County, and the 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 44 of ? Cities of Antioch, Concord, and Pittsburg. Since 1990, the proportions of the population of the City of Walnut Creek that are Hispanic and Asian or Pacific Islander, respectively, have increased at a faster rate than in the Region and at a similar rate to that of the County and the Cities of Antioch and Concord, albeit starting from a lower concentration of Hispanic residents in 1990 than in the other cities. Asian or Pacific Islander population concentration has increased more rapidly than in the City of Pittsburg while the increase in Hispanic population concentration has been similar in both cities. Overall population growth in the City of Walnut Creek has been more muted than in the Region, the County, and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, and Pittsburg. National Origin Consistent with the relatively low concentration of Hispanic residents and the high concentration of non-Hispanic Whites in the City of Walnut Creek, the composition of the City of Walnut Creek by national origin looks quite different from elsewhere in the County and the Region. Although individuals of Mexican national origin remain the largest national origin group, the gap between Mexican Americans and Chinese Americans is far smaller than elsewhere in the County. Additionally, Russia, England, the Ukraine, and Canada are all among the four most common countries of origin. The distribution of the Asian or Pacific Islander population also varies from other cities within the County where individuals of Filipino national origin predominate. In the City of Walnut Creek, China, Iran, and India are more common national origins than the Philippines, and the concentration of Filipino Americans only barely exceeds that of Korean Americans. Like elsewhere in the County, the percentage of foreign-born residents of the City of Walnut Creek has increased at a faster rate than in the Region. The percentage of foreign-born residents still lags behind the Region since the percentage of foreign-born residents of the City of Walnut Creek in 1990 was low. Limited English Proficiency Consistent with the data discussed above with respect to national origin, the City of Walnut Creek has higher concentrations of Russian, Korean, and Persian speakers than do the County and the Region. Although Spanish remains the most commonly spoken language for LEP individuals, the percentage of LEP Spanish speakers in the City of Walnut Creek is far below those of the Region, the County, and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, and Pittsburg. The percentage of LEP Chinese speakers is lower than that of the Region but similar to that of the County. Unlike elsewhere in the County, Tagalog is not among the most commonly spoken languages for LEP individuals. Since 1990, the percentage of the population that is LEP, as elsewhere in the County, has increased at a faster rate than in the Region while starting from a lower baseline percentage of LEP individuals in 1990. Sex The percentage of the population of the City of Walnut Creek that is female is far greater than in the Region, the County, and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, and Pittsburg. This is likely, at least in part, the result of the older nature of the population of the City of Walnut Creek, as life 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 45 of ? expectancy is longer for women than it is for men. Age-restricted communities like Rossmoor are likely to have disproportionately female populations. The sex distribution of the population of the City of Walnut Creek has been relatively stable since 1990 though the percentage of the population that is male has increased slightly. Age The City of Walnut Creek has a higher concentration of elderly individuals and lower concentrations of children and working-age adults than the Region, the County, and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, and Pittsburg. This is likely the result of the presence of age-restricted developments like Rossmoor within the boundaries of the City of Walnut Creek. As was the case elsewhere in the Region, the percentage of children increased between 1990 and 2000 before falling back to approximately the same level as in 1990 by 2010. The percentage of working age adults decreased between 1990 and 2000 but was flat between 2000 and 2010. Elsewhere in the Region, the percentage of working age adults tended to increase between 2000 and 2010. The percentage of elderly individuals steadily increased between 1990 and the present. Familial Status The percentage of families with children in the City of Walnut Creek is significantly lower than in the Region, the County, and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, and Pittsburg. As is true across the Region, the percentage of families with children increased between 1990 and 2000 before falling since 2000. Disability The percentages of residents of the City of Walnut Creek with various types of disabilities exceed those of the region for four out of the six types of disabilities for which data is available. The City of Walnut Creek has higher concentrations of individuals with hearing, vision, ambulatory, and independent living disabilities than the Region and lower concentrations of individuals with cognitive and self-care disabilities. In part as a result of the high concentration of elderly residents in the City of Walnut Creek as discussed below and the presence of large, age-restricted developments like Rossmoor, the percentage of individuals with hearing disabilities is particularly high. Although not all individuals with hearing disabilities are elderly, older adults are statistically more likely to have hearing disabilities than are younger individuals. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 46 of ? 4.2 Segregation and Integration Segregation exists where there is a concentration of individuals with a particular protected characteristic in relation to the broader geographic area. Segregation can exist wholly within a particular city where particular neighborhoods have concentrations of protected class members. Within Contra Costa County, the City of Concord typifies this type of segregation. Segregation can also exist between municipalities and even across County boundaries within a broader metropolitan area. The contrast between east and west County communities with high Black and Hispanic population concentrations, such Antioch, Pittsburg, and Richmond, and central County communities with low Black and Hispanic population concentrations, like Danville, Lafayette, and Walnut Creek, provides an example of this type of segregation. For persons with disabilities, as is explored in the Disability and Access Section of this Analysis, segregation also includes residence in congregate and/or institutional facilities that allow for limited interaction with people who do not have disabilities, regardless of where those dwellings are located. Integration, by contrast, consists of both relative dispersion or lack of concentration of protected class members and, for persons with disabilities, residence in settings like permanent supportive housing that provide opportunities for interaction with persons who do not have disabilities. As the passage of the Fair Housing Act by Congress in 1968 was, in large measure, as response to pervasive patterns of residential segregation to which government action contributed significantly, segregation and integration are essential topics in any fair housing planning process. This section reviews data to build an understanding of the dynamics of segregation in the Region, the County, and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. Segregation in jurisdictions, region, and racial/ethnic groups Contra Costa County and the Region As measured by the Dissimilarity Index, Black residents face the highest levels of segregation of any racial or ethnic group in both the County and the Region. Hispanics are the next most segregated group, followed by Asian or Pacific Islanders. The Dissimilarity Index shows the percentage of people of a particular race or ethnicity within a geographic area, such as a city or metropolitan area that would have to move to a different Census Tract in order to be evenly distributed across the broader area in relation to another group. The higher the Dissimilarity Index, the more uneven the population of different groups is in relation to each other. Dissimilarity Indices of less than 40 are generally considered low, Indices of 40 to 55 are considered moderate, and those over 55 are considered high. While levels of Black-White segregation are above thresholds that social scientists would consider to characterize high segregation, index levels for Hispanics and Asians and Pacific Islanders suggest moderate segregation. Across all groups, segregation is higher in the Region than it is within the County although the difference in the intensity of segregation is more modest for Blacks and Hispanics than it is for Asians and Pacific Islanders. The lower level of segregation for Asians 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 47 of ? and Pacific Islanders in the County than in the Region is consistent with the relatively smaller concentration of Asian or Pacific Islander residents in the County than in the Region. In general, less populous groups tend to face lower levels of segregation. The table (see appendix, Table 2) shows the Isolation and Exposure Indices for the Region as of the 2010 Census. Note that the name of the Region varies from that included in the HUD- provided data because the federal Office of Management and Budget changed the designation of the third principal city in the metropolitan statistical area from the City of Fremont to the City of Hayward based on labor market statistics. The Isolation and Exposure Indices combine to illustrate the typical neighborhood (or Census Tract-level) experience of the average member of each racial or ethnic group. For the average member of a particular racial or ethnic group within a geographic area, the Isolation Index shows the percentage of residents of the Census Tract in which they live that is of the same race or ethnicity as them. For example, as reflected in the tables in the appendix, the Isolation Index for Hispanic residents of the Region is 35.5. This means that the average Hispanic resident of the Region lives in a Census Tract that is 35.5 percent Hispanic. The Exposure Index works similarly but shows the concentration of individuals of other races and ethnicities. For Hispanic residents of the Region, the Exposure Index with respect to non-Hispanic White residents is 30.8. This means that the average Hispanic resident of the Region lives in a Census Tract that is 30.8 percent non-Hispanic White. Significant differences between those neighborhood conditions and the overall demographics of a region or place are reflective of segregation. The Isolation and Exposure Indices offer a less abstract frame for evaluating residential segregation than does the Dissimilarity Index since the Isolation and Exposure Indices directly reflect the experience of daily life for residents. Unfortunately, unlike at the regional level, Isolation and Exposure Index data is not readily available at the County level for any year past 2000 and is not available updated with more recent American Community Survey data. Additionally, available data for the Isolation and Exposure Indices does not combine Asians with Pacific Islanders. In the Region, the average White resident lives in a Census Tract that has lower percentages of Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians than the Region as a whole. The gap is proportionally smallest for Asians and is largest for Hispanics. The average Black resident lives in a Census Tract that is much more heavily Black, slightly more heavily Hispanic, slightly less heavily Asian, and much less heavily White than the Region as a whole. The average Hispanic resident lives in a Census Tract that is much more heavily Hispanic, much less heavily White, slightly more heavily Black, and slightly less heavily Asian than the Region as a whole. The average Asian resident lives in a Census much more heavily Asian, slightly less heavily White, slightly less heavily Black, and slightly less heavily Hispanic than the Region as a whole. Overall, the picture that this data paints of the Region is a nuanced one. Asians are, on the one hand, are the more isolated than Blacks and Hispanics yet more exposed to Whites. The Region clearly has many neighborhoods with relatively high White and Asian populations and low Black and Hispanic populations. This dynamic is apparent in Contra Costa County in the 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 48 of ? City of San Ramon. Blacks are simultaneously less isolated than Hispanics and Asians but also less exposed to Whites. The average Black resident of the Region lives in a neighborhood characterized by what, in the Dissimilarity Index discussed above, would be termed White- Non-White segregation. The total population of a racial or ethnic group within an area is often predictive of how segregated that group will appear. Isolation Index values tend to be lower for groups that are less numerous in a place. Antioch In the City of Antioch, levels of segregation are low for all groups, but Asians and Pacific Islanders face the lowest levels of segregation, followed by Blacks. Hispanics are, by, far, the least segregated group. This data is instructive of the manner in which segregation is a regional and inter-municipal phenomenon. Blacks, in particular, are segregated in the City of Antioch, but the areas from which they are disproportionately excluded are other municipalities and unincorporated areas throughout the County and the Region, not other neighborhoods within the City of Antioch. In the City of Antioch, Isolation and Exposure Index data confirms that point made above with regard to segregation in the City: the primary dynamic of segregation in Antioch is between the City of Antioch and other communities in the County and Region, not between neighborhoods in the City of Antioch. The average resident of each race or ethnicity lives in a Census Tract that is between 32.9 percent and 38.1 percent White, between 17.2 percent and 21.1 percent Black, between 27.0 percent and 33.8 percent Hispanic, and between 11.8 percent and 16.7 percent Asian. These are relatively narrow bands. One aspect of residential patterns in the City of Antioch that is unique from those of the Region is that Asian exposure to Blacks is actually higher than Black isolation. This cuts against the regional trend of relatively greater overlap between White and Asian concentration. Concord Hispanic residents of the City of Concord face the highest level of segregation, which is moderate, of any racial or ethnic group within the City of Concord. Black residents in the City of Concord face the next highest level of segregation while Asian or Pacific Islanders face by far the lowest level of segregation. For all racial or ethnic groups, levels of segregation in the City of Concord are below what they are in the Region and the County. The higher level of segregation faced by Hispanics in comparison to Blacks is consistent with the fact that the City of Concord has a much larger concentration of Hispanics than it does of Blacks and segregation levels tend to be higher for more populous groups. In the City of Concord, Isolation and Exposure Index data makes clear that racial and ethnic groups vary significantly in their exposure to Whites and Hispanics while the average resident of each racial or ethnic group lives in a Census Tract with relatively similar percentages of Blacks and Asians. Hispanics live in the Census Tracts with the highest concentrations of Hispanic residents and the lowest concentrations of Whites. Unsurprisingly, Whites live in the Census Tracts with the highest concentrations of Whites and the lowest 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 49 of ? concentrations of Hispanics. The average Black and Asian residents of the City have experiences falling in between those polls, with Blacks encountering neighborhood conditions that are somewhat more similar to those faced by Hispanics and with Asians residing in neighborhoods that are more similar to those occupied by Whites. Pittsburg In the City of Pittsburg, levels of segregation are low across racial and ethnic groups. Blacks and Asians and Pacific Islanders face modestly higher levels of segregation than Hispanics. As in the City of Antioch, the City of Pittsburg is an area of population concentration for Blacks and Hispanics who are excluded from other communities within the County and the Region to a much greater extent than they are excluded from neighborhoods within the City of Pittsburg. In the City of Pittsburg, the Isolation and Exposure Indices reveal slightly more segregation than in the City of Antioch though the broad trend of relatively similar neighborhood demographics across racial and ethnic groups still holds. In the City of Pittsburg, the indices reflect a wider gap between Asian and Hispanic resident experiences than between any two other groups. Walnut Creek In the City of Walnut Creek, Black residents face the highest levels of segregation of any racial or ethnic group, followed closely by Hispanics while segregation is lowest for Asians and Pacific Islanders. At the same time, segregation across all groups is low. The situation in the City of Walnut Creek is, in some respects, the inverse of that in the Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg. Although there may be some concentration of people of color in particular neighborhoods in the City of Walnut Creek, the primary way in which exclusion operates in the City of Walnut Creek is through the disproportionate exclusion of Black and Hispanic households from the City of Walnut Creek, as a whole, rather than from specific neighborhoods within the City of Walnut Creek. In the City of Walnut Creek, as in the Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg, the Isolation and Exposure Indices do not suggest high levels of segregation within each city. The average neighborhood demographics experienced by members of each racial or ethnic group largely mirror each other. With that said, the Isolation Index for Whites in the City of Walnut Creek is the highest Isolation Index value for any of the four entitlement cities in Contra Costa County. This suggests that, between the City of Walnut Creek and other parts of the County and Region, non-White individuals disproportionately face barriers to residing in the City of Walnut Creek. Areas of high segregation and integration Contra Costa County in Regional Context 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 50 of ? There are areas of segregation throughout Contra Costa County.  Black residents are concentrated in the cities of Antioch, Hercules, Pittsburg, and Richmond and the unincorporated community of North Richmond.  Hispanic residents are concentrated in the cities of Pittsburg, Richmond, and San Pablo; in specific neighborhoods within the cities of Antioch, Concord, and Oakley; and in the unincorporated communities of Bay Point, Montalvin Manor, North Richmond, and Rollingwood. Asians and Pacific Islanders are concentrated in the Cities of Hercules and San Ramon as well as in the unincorporated communities of Camino Tassajara and Norris Canyon.  There are also areas of concentration of Asians and Pacific Islanders within neighborhoods in the cities of El Cerrito and Pinole.  Non-Hispanic White residents are concentrated in the cities of Clayton, Lafayette, Orinda, and Walnut Creek; in the Town of Danville; and in the unincorporated communities of Alamo, Alhambra Valley, Bethel Island, Castle Hill, Diablo, Discovery Bay, Kensington, Knightsen, Port Costa, Reliez Valley, San Miguel, and Saranap.  There are also concentrations of non-Hispanic Whites within specific neighborhoods in the cities of Concord, Martinez, and Pleasant Hill. In general, the areas with the greatest concentrations of non-Hispanic Whites are located in the southern portions of central Contra Costa County. In the Region, there are concentrations of:  Black residents in East and West Oakland, in the Bayview-Hunters Point neighborhood in the City of San Francisco, and in the City of East Palo Alto in San Mateo County.  Hispanic residents are concentrated in East Oakland, the Mission District within the City of San Francisco, the Cities of East Palo Alto and Redwood City within San Mateo County, and the City of San Rafael within Marin County.  Asians and Pacific Islander residents in several neighborhoods throughout the City of San Francisco including the Richmond and Sunset Districts and Chinatown; in Downtown Oakland, including Chinatown; in the Cities of Fremont and Union City in Alameda County; in the Cities of Daly City and South San Francisco in San Mateo County; and around the campus of the University of California, Berkeley in the City of Berkeley in Alameda County. In Contra Costa County, there is a concentration of individuals of:  Mexican national origin are concentrated in the Cities of Richmond and San Pablo in west County; in the western portions of the City of Concord; and in the Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg as well as the unincorporated community of Bay Point in east County. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 51 of ?  Filipino national origin are concentrated in the Cities of Hercules and Pinole in west County; in the City of San Ramon; and in the southern portions of the Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg in east County.  Chinese national origin are concentrated in the City of El Cerrito in west County and in the City of San Ramon.  Indian national origin are concentrated in the City of San Ramon.  El Salvadoran national origin are concentrated in the Cities of Richmond and San Pablo and the unincorporated community of North Richmond in west County and in the southern portion of the City of Pittsburg in east County. In the Region, there are concentrations of individuals of:  Mexican national origin in the Mission District in the City of San Francisco; in the cities of East Palo Alto and Redwood City in San Mateo County; in the southern portion of the City of San Rafael in Marin County; and in East Oakland, the northern portion of the City of San Leandro, and in the City of Hayward in Alameda County.  Chinese national origin in Chinatown and the Richmond and Sunset Districts in the City of San Francisco; in the City of Millbrae in San Mateo County; and in Downtown Oakland and in the southeastern portion of the City of Fremont in Alameda County.  Filipino national origin in Chinatown in the City of San Francisco; in the City of Daly City in San Mateo County; and in the Cities of Alameda, Dublin, and Union City and in the southern portion of the City of San Leandro in Alameda County.  Indian national origin in the Cities of Fremont and Union City in Alameda County.  Vietnamese national origin in the Richmond District in the City of San Francisco, in the southern portions of the City of San Leandro, and the City of Livermore. In Contra Costa County, persons with limited proficiency in speaking English are concentrated as follows:  Spanish speakers in the cities of Richmond and San Pablo in west County; in the western portions of the City of Concord, including the Monument Corridor; and in the unincorporated community of Bay Point and the nearby by northern portions of the Cities of Pittsburg and Antioch.  Chinese speakers in the southern City of San Ramon and in the City of El Cerrito and the eastern portions of the Cities of Richmond and San Pablo in west County.  Tagalog speakers in the eastern portions of the City of Concord, in the Cities of Hercules and Pinole in west County, and in the City of Oakley and the southeastern portion of the City of Antioch in east County. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 52 of ?  Persian speakers in the City of Pleasant Hill, the City of Clayton, the northern portion of the City of Orinda, the southwestern portion of the City of Walnut Creek, and the eastern portion of the City of Concord.  Korean speakers in the cities of Pleasant Hill and San Ramon. In the Region, persons with limited proficiency in speaking English are concentrated as follows:  Spanish speakers in the Mission District in the City of San Francisco; in the City of East Palo Alto, in the northern portion of the City of San Mateo, in the southern portion of Redwood City, and in the unincorporated community of North Fair Oaks in San Mateo County; in the southern portion of the City of San Rafael in Marin County; and in East Oakland, the northern portion of the City of San Leandro, the City of Hayward, and in the northern portion of Union City in Alameda County.  Chinese speakers in Chinatown, the Sunset District, and the Richmond District in the City of San Francisco; the Cities of Daly City and Millbrae in San Mateo County; and Downtown Oakland, the southern portion of the City of San Leandro, and the Cities of Alameda, Fremont, and Union City in Alameda County.  Tagalog speakers in Chinatown in the City of San Francisco; in the City of Daly City in San Mateo County; and in the City of Alameda, in the unincorporated community of Ashland, and in the southern portions of the City of San Leandro in Alameda County. Antioch Within the City of Antioch, there is a concentration of:  Black residents in the western portion of City of Antioch along both sides of California Route 4 as well as in more recently built subdivisions in the southeastern portion of the City of Antioch.  Hispanic residents throughout the City of Antioch but appear to be more highly concentrated north of Route 4.  Asians and Pacific Islanders south of Route 4 and, in particular, in the southeastern portion of the City of Antioch.  Non-Hispanic White residents throughout the City of Antioch but appear to be somewhat concentrated north of Route 4, particularly in neighborhoods that are not immediately adjacent to the highway.  It is worth noting that even in the census tracts in Antioch with higher concentrations of Non-Hispanic White residents, the proportion of White residents is still lower than the White population share in the region. In the City of Antioch, individuals of: 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 53 of ?  Mexican national origin are relatively concentrated in the northern and, in particular, the northwestern portions of the City of Antioch.  Filipino national origin are largely concentrated in the central and southern portions of the City of Antioch  Nigerian-Americans are largely concentrated in the central and southern portions of the City of Antioch  There are no apparent areas of concentration for individuals of El Salvadoran and Nicaraguan national origin. In the City of Antioch, persons with limited proficiency in speaking English are concentrated as follows:  Spanish speakers are concentrated in the northern portion of the City.  Tagalog and Chinese speaking LEP individuals are concentrated in the central and southern portions of the City of Antioch.  Persian speaking LEP individuals are concentrated in the central portion of the City of Antioch.  There are no evident patterns of concentration with respect to LEP individuals who speak African languages. Concord In the City of Concord, Hispanics are concentrated along the Monument Corridor in the western portion of the City of Concord and immediately to the north of the Monument Corridor. Asians and Pacific Islanders appear to be spread relatively evenly across the City of Concord. Non-Hispanic Whites are concentrated in the eastern half of the City of Concord. The City of Concord’s Black population is small and relatively spread out, but the areas that come closest to having concentrations of Black residents are heavily Hispanic neighborhoods to the north of the Monument Corridor. In the City of Concord, there is a concentration of individuals of:  Mexican national origin in the western portions of the City of Concord, including the Monument Corridor.  Filipino national origin in the southwestern, central, and eastern portions of the City of Concord. Filipino-Americans are more integrated throughout the City of Concord but largely do not reside in the Monument Corridor and neighborhoods immediately to its north. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 54 of ?  El Salvadoran national origin are more integrated throughout the City of Concord than are individuals of Mexican national origin but are still somewhat concentrated in the western portions of the City of Concord, albeit not within the Monument Corridor.  There are no areas of concentration of individuals of Chinese or Indian national origin in the City of Concord. In the City of Concord, persons with limited proficiency in speaking English are concentrated as follows:  Spanish speakers in the western portions of the City, following a pattern consistent with areas of concentration for Hispanics, Mexican-Americans, and Salvadoran- Americans as discussed above.  Tagalog and Chinese speakers in the southern portions of the City of Concord, including in the southwestern corner of the City of Concord near the Monument Corridor though to a greater extend in the south-central and southeastern portions of the City of Concord.  Russian and Persian speakers in the central and southeastern portions of the City of Concord. Pittsburg In the City of Pittsburg, residents are concentrated as follows:  Black residents in the eastern portion of the city.  Hispanics in the central and northern portions.  Asians and Pacific Islanders in the far western portion, which lies to the south of Bay Point.  Non-Hispanic White - As in the City of Antioch, there are no areas of intense non- Hispanic White population concentration in the City of Pittsburg. In comparison to the rest of the city, the far southern portion, which features newly constructed subdivisions, is more heavily non-Hispanic White than the rest of the city. In the City of Pittsburg, individuals of:  Mexican, El Salvadoran, and Vietnamese national origin are relatively even distributed throughout the City of Pittsburg.  Filipino-American and Indian-American residents are concentrated in the far western portion of the city. In the City of Pittsburg, persons with limited proficiency in speaking English are concentrated as follows: 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 55 of ?  Spanish speakers reside throughout the City of Pittsburg, with a particular concentration in the central part of the city.  Tagalog, Vietnamese, and Chinese speakers show no clear patterns of concentration.  Other Pacific Island language speakers are somewhat concentrated in the northern portion of the city. Walnut Creek In the City of Walnut Creek, residents are concentrated as follows:  Hispanic in and adjacent to Downtown Walnut Creek.  Asians and Pacific Islanders in the northern portions of the City of Walnut Creek.  Non-Hispanic Whites predominate throughout the city but make up even larger majorities in the southern portions of the city.  Consistent with the City of Walnut Creek’s very small Black population, there are no areas of relative Black population concentration in the City of Walnut Creek. In the City of Walnut Creek, individuals are concentrated as followed:  Mexican national origin near downtown Walnut Creek.  Filipino national origin in the northeastern portion of the city.  Chinese, Iranian, and Indian national origin are not concentrated in particular parts of the city. In the City of Walnut Creek, persons with limited proficiency in speaking English are concentrated as follows:  Spanish speaking are relatively concentrated in and around Downtown Walnut Creek.  Russian speaking relatively to the east of Downtown in the north-central portion of the city.  Chinese, Korean, and Persian - there are no areas of apparent areas of concentration. Change in segregation over time (since 1990) Contra Costa County in Regional Context Since 1990, segregation for Blacks has decreased in the County while levels of segregation for Hispanics and Asians and Pacific Islanders have increased. The increase in the level of segregation faced by Hispanics is significantly greater than the increase faced by Asians and Pacific Islanders. This is consistent with Region-wide trends. The levels of segregation faced 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 56 of ? by Asians and Pacific Islanders actually decreased initially, between 1990 and 2000 in the County and between 1990 and 2010 in the Region, before increasing more recently. Despite long-term decreases in segregation, Blacks have experienced a modest uptick in segregation in both the County and the Region since 2010. The contrast between the decrease in segregation faced by Blacks in the County and the Region and the increases experienced in the Cities of Antioch, Concord, and Walnut Creek are readily explicable. The main driver of desegregation at a higher level of geography – whether the County or the Region – has been the out-migration of Blacks from historically Black neighborhoods in the Cities of Richmond, Oakland, and San Francisco toward suburban cities that have historically had small Black populations. Some of the neighborhoods to which Blacks have moved in these cities, like the City of Antioch, have concentrations of Black population relative to the city- wide average but relatively low Black populations in comparison to historically Black neighborhoods in the Cities of Richmond, Oakland, and San Francisco. Isolation and Exposure Index data provides a fuller context to the Dissimilarity Index data discussed above. The data confirms that the segregation of Hispanic and Asian individuals has increased but tells a more ambiguous story with respect to Blacks. The isolation of Blacks has plummeted while Black exposure to non-Hispanic Whites has barely changed. This means that, as the proportion of the Region’s population comprised of Hispanics and Asians has increased, the neighborhoods in which Blacks have lived have become decreasingly Black and increasingly Hispanic and Asian while the White population of those neighborhoods has remained the same. Because Whites comprise a smaller percentage of the Region’s population than they did previously, the Dissimilarity Index suggests that there is less imbalance between where Blacks and Whites live. However, since neighborhood amenities are still concentrated in predominantly White areas, the Exposure Index data suggests that the desegregation shown by the Dissimilarity Index does not carry all of the expected benefits. Historical Isolation and Exposure Index data also confirms what Dissimilarity Index data showed with respect to relative levels of segregation with respect to Whites among racial and ethnic minority groups. In 1980, Hispanics and Asians in the Region lived in neighborhoods that were approximately as heavily White as the neighborhoods in which the average White individual in the Region resides today. Thus, in the Region, the intergenerational effects of residential segregation affect Blacks in a profound way that is unique among racial and ethnic groups. Antioch Since 1990, levels of segregation faced by Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander residents of the City of Antioch have increased across the board. At the same time, the rate of increase has not been consistent. Segregation for Blacks actually decreased between 1990 and 2010 before increasing in the past few years. Segregation for Hispanics increased notably between 1990 and 2000 but has been mostly flat since. Only for Asians and Pacific Islanders has the increase in segregation been relatively consistent. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 57 of ? Concord Since 1990, segregation has increased for Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians and Pacific Islanders. Compared to the Cities of Antioch, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek, these changes have been both relatively consistent and relatively large. The one caveat to that characterization is that levels of segregation for Asians and Pacific Islanders were relatively flat in the City of Concord between 1990 and 2010 before a recent increase. The increase in Hispanic segregation, which more than doubled, is particularly noteworthy. Isolation and Exposure Index data confirm increasing levels of segregation for Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians in the City of Concord in recent decades with Hispanics experiencing the largest increases. Unlike the Dissimilarity Index, Isolation and Exposure Index data show relatively consistent increases in the segregation of Asians. Pittsburg Since 1990, levels of segregation for Blacks and Hispanics in the City of Pittsburg have been relatively unchanged while segregation for Asians and Pacific Islanders has increased. These overall trends mask significant instability in the levels of segregation for Blacks and Hispanics in Pittsburg. The segregation of Blacks decreased steadily between 1990 and 2010 before a recent increase wiped out all of that improvement. For Hispanics, segregation increased between 1990 and 2000 before decreasing between 2000 and 2010. It has been stable since 2010. Walnut Creek Since 1990, segregation in the City of Walnut Creek has risen for Blacks and Hispanics but has been relatively unchanged for Asians and Pacific Islanders. Trends in segregation have not been consistent over time. Segregation for Blacks was essentially unchanged between 1990 and 2010 but has risen since. For Hispanics, segregation rose between 1990 and 2000 before decreasing between 2000 and 2010 yet then increasing again between 2010 and the present. Segregation for Asians and Pacific Islanders decreased between 1990 and 2010, but an increase since 2010 has negated much of that improvement. Owner & Renter Housing with Trends Over Time Contra Costa County and the Region In Contra Costa County, segregated communities with high concentrations of non-Hispanic Whites tend to have the highest rates of homeownership while areas of racial and ethnic minority population concentration, in general, and Black and Hispanic population concentration, in particular, tend to have the lowest rates of homeownership. Regardless of demography, communities in the more urbanized western portion of the County tend to have 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 58 of ? lower rates of homeownership than communities in the suburban central portion of the County and the exurban fringe of east County. Thus, the east County City of Oakley, which has a significantly higher combined Black and Hispanic population concentration than the west County City of El Cerrito, has a higher homeownership than the City of El Cerrito. This trend of higher homeownership levels in areas with less urban land use and development patterns does not negate the overall trend toward higher rates of homeownership in areas of non- Hispanic White population concentration. Predominantly non-Hispanic White communities with high rates of homeownership include, but are not limited to, the Cities of Clayton, Danville, and Orinda and the unincorporated areas of Alamo, Alhambra Valley, Castle Hill, Diablo, and San Miguel. One heavily minority unincorporated community, Bayview, has a high homeownership rate. Heavily Black and Hispanic communities with low homeownership rates include the Cities of Richmond and San Pablo and unincorporated North Richmond. Unincorporated Contra Costa Centre, which is predominantly non-Hispanic White and Asian, has a very low homeownership rate, which is consistent with the predominant high-density land use patterns in the small community near the Pleasant Hill BART station. Antioch In the City of Antioch, homeownership rates are highest in the southern and northeastern portions of the City of Antioch and are lowest in the northwestern and central parts of the City of Antioch. The southern portion of the City of Antioch is more heavily Asian and Pacific Islander than the City of Antioch as a whole while the northeastern portion of the City of Antioch is more heavily White than the City of Antioch as a whole. Areas with low homeownership rates are predominantly Black and Hispanic. Concord Map 18 (see appendix) reflects the percentage of occupied housing units that are owner occupied by census tract for census tracts that are fully or partially within the City of Concord. The City of Concord contains parts of multiple Census Tracts that are not coterminous with the City of Concord’s borders, so, as a result, the area depicted on the map is considerably larger than the City of Concord itself. The City of Concord’s south-central and southeastern sections tend to have the highest homeownership rates. The Monument Corridor and nearby neighborhoods to its north tend to have the lowest homeownership rates. In general, the areas with higher homeownership rates are more heavily White while those with lower homeownership rates are more heavily Hispanic. Pittsburg As with the City of Concord, there is significant overlap between the Census Tracts that comprise the City of Pittsburg and neighboring communities, including the City of Antioch and unincorporated Bay Point. In general, the western and far southern portions of the City of Pittsburg have the highest homeownership rates (note that the Census Tracts in the far 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 59 of ? northwest with relatively low homeownership rates are primarily comprised of Bay Point). The eastern portions of the City of Pittsburg along both sides of Highway 4 tend to have the lowest homeownership rates. The portions of the City of Pittsburg with the lowest homeownership rates are disproportionately Black. Those with the highest homeownership rates are more heavily Asian and Pacific Islander, in the case of the far western portion of the City of Pittsburg, and more heavily White, in the case of the far southern portion of the City of Pittsburg, than the City of Pittsburg as a whole. Walnut Creek In the City of Walnut Creek, homeownership rates are highest in the eastern and southern portions of the City of Walnut Creek. Homeownership rates are lowest in Downtown Walnut Creek. Areas to the west and north of Downtown Walnut Creek have more moderate homeownership rates. The areas with the lowest homeownership rates are among the most heavily Hispanic portions of the City of Walnut Creek. The southern portions of the City of Walnut Creek, which have high homeownership rates, are more heavily White than the City of Walnut Creek as a whole. Demographic Patterns Contributing to Future Segregation Regional Housing Crisis As has been abundantly documented, the San Francisco Bay Area, defined broadly to include the South Bay in addition to the Region as defined in this Assessment, is in the midst of a housing affordability crisis that has stretched the resources of middle- and upper-middle- income households while displacing low-income households. This dynamic contributes to segregation in Contra Costa County and the Cities of Concord, Antioch, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek in a few distinct ways. First, because housing supply is so constrained and housing prices are so high, new private development tends to go on the market at a very high price point, especially in central County. Given the correlation between race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status in the Region, this means that White and Asian and Pacific Islander households can disproportionately afford newly constructed housing while Black and Hispanic households cannot. Thus, in the absence of policy interventions such as inclusionary zoning, new development tends to reproduce existing patterns of segregation. There are examples within the County of effective interventions to ensure inclusion despite high home values for new construction, including the Dougherty Valley section of the City of San Ramon and the planned redevelopment of the Concord Naval Weapons Station. The test for communities in Contra Costa County will be to make these examples the rule rather than the exception. Second, longtime low-income communities of color within the Region, such as historically Black West Oakland and the historically Hispanic Mission District in San Francisco, have undergone significant gentrification as a result of infill development and the rehabilitation and flipping of existing structures to meet demand from high-income and middle-income 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 60 of ? households seeking proximity to jobs, transit, and other amenities. Signs of this phenomenon are starting to appear in the City of Richmond in Contra Costa County though the process has not progressed as far there as in Oakland and San Francisco. Displaced households have few options in the urban core of the Region or in high-opportunity suburbs and, instead, often relocate to communities at the edges of the Region. East Contra Costa County and the City of Antioch, in particular, are frequent destinations though exurban communities in Solano County and cities that are outside of the Region entirely, such as Fresno and Stockton, have experienced influxes of displaced residents, as well. The communities to which displaced residents have moved sometimes, as in the City of Pittsburg, have an existing base of racial and ethnic diversity but at other times, as in the City of Antioch, do not. In the former case, the population shift of Black and Hispanic residents from Oakland and San Francisco to areas of Black and Hispanic population concentration reinforces existing patterns of segregation. In the latter case, the shift of population can hold the fleeting promise of integration, but, in practice and without strategic policy interventions, integration is only a brief prelude to resegregation. As cities like Brentwood and Oakley at the eastern edge of Contra Costa County grow and change, it will be important to apply the lessons learned by other diverse suburbs around the country including Oak Park, Illinois, Shaker Heights, Ohio, and Maplewood-South Orange, New Jersey about maintaining stable residential integration.8 Representative types of efforts include restrictions on blockbusting tactics and attempts to induce panic selling, efforts to ensure access to affordable home purchase and refinance loans, incentives for households to move to neighborhoods in which they are underrepresented, and aggressive, affirmative marketing. Aftereffects of the Foreclosure Crisis The subprime foreclosure crisis of a decade ago hit multiple communities in Contra Costa County extremely hard. In parts of the County, the crisis has had lasting effects on the housing market that have contributed to patterns of segregation. A few clear trends are apparent from this data. The first is that cities that were existing areas of Black and Hispanic population concentration when the foreclosure crisis hit were areas of concentrated foreclosure activity at the height of the foreclosure crisis. The second is that communities at the developing fringe of east County that were historically predominantly White but that have rapidly diversified were also areas of concentrated foreclosure activity. Lastly, predominantly White or predominantly White and Asian and Pacific Islander, affluent communities in central County had the lowest rates of foreclosure. The downstream impact of the crisis on segregation has been profound yet complex. First, concentrated foreclosures in predominantly Black and Hispanic communities wiped out significant wealth among Black and Hispanic homeowners, both those who lost their homes to foreclosure and those whose home equity was diminished by declining home values. This 8 See, e.g., Rob Breymaier, A Shared Future, available at http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/a_shared_future_social_and_economic_value_intentional_integ ration_programs_0.pdf. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 61 of ? loss of wealth imposed an additional barrier to Black and Hispanic homeowners using their accumulated wealth to purchase homes in and relocate to affluent communities with small Black and Hispanic populations in central County. Second, the nationally documented trend of poor maintenance of real estate owned (REO) properties following foreclosure, particularly in communities of color, resulted in the deterioration of the physical condition of neighborhoods in a manner that, in the demographically changing communities of east County, could accelerate White Flight (the movement of White residents from cities to predominantly White suburbs). Third, many owners of REO properties opted not to bring those homes back to the market for sale, instead choosing to rent out single-family homes. This trend has accelerated patterns of racial succession in east County and undermined stable integration in light disparities in housing tenure by race and ethnicity throughout the region. The City of Antioch, which has undergone starker and less stable demographic change than any other community in the County, is a prime example of this phenomenon. Between the 2005-2007 American Community Survey 3-Year Estimates and the 2016 American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates, the homeownership rate in the City of Antioch dropped from 72.9 percent to 61.5 percent while the percentage of occupied housing units that are in structures with five or more units barely increased from 12.2 percent to 13.0 percent. Open Space and Growth Boundaries For a County that is located entirely within a major metropolitan area, a significant portion of the land area of Contra Costa County is dedicated to state and regional parkland and other open space preservation. Map 21 (see appendix) from the Land Use Element of the County’s General Plan depicts the land area of the County, including incorporated cities, by broad land use classification. In particular, it shows the amount of land set aside for Parks and Recreation, Open Space, Agricultural Lands, Agricultural Core, Delta Recreation, and Watershed. The second map shows the County’s Urban Limit Line, outside of which most of the land uses specified above are located. Three attributes of land protected from development in Contra Costa County are immediately apparent from these maps. The first is the amount of protected land is vast in comparison with what one might ordinarily find in a suburban County in a large metropolitan area. The second is that the protected land is not contiguous and is not all located at the eastern periphery of the County. Thus, land that is much closer to the central urban areas of the Region, like Briones Regional Park, is closed to development while subdivisions rapidly crop up in the much more remote communities of Brentwood and Oakley. The third is that many, though not all, of the protected areas are adjacent to predominantly White and often affluent communities. Combined, these factors show the difficulty of breaking down existing patterns of segregation. New development that is intentionally crafted to include affordable housing, whether through inclusionary zoning or through subsidized projects, located near existing predominantly 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 62 of ? White, affluent communities would be pivotal in such efforts. However, undeveloped land that is located within the Urban Limit Line in such locations is limited, and, in the absence of strong inclusionary zoning, the development of such land will most often result in the production of more luxury housing. Furthermore, the housing stock in many predominantly White, affluent parts of the County is relatively new, thus limiting the potential for the adaptive reuse of land for denser and more affordable housing. The extent of open space preservation in the County complicates efforts to foster residential racial and ethnic integration but does not necessarily mean that high-density residential development should dot the hillsides and valleys of state and regional parks. There is clear value in preserving open spaces for the benefit of all Contra Costa County residents, regardless of income, race, and ethnicity. Instead, it raises the stakes for the nature of the development of what infill opportunities do exist in areas adjacent to protected lands. It also highlights the importance of utilizing an equity frame when evaluating whether to preserve more marginal open spaces that may not have the obvious natural or recreational value of a recognized treasure like Mount Diablo. Lastly, it underscores the need to identify opportunities to preserve open space in and around low-income communities of color, including by remediating contaminated sites along the County’s waterfront. Segregation Affecting Other Protected Groups Religion HUD does not provide and the Census Bureau does not collect data concerning religious affiliation, but religion remains a prohibited basis for discrimination under the Fair Housing Act. Although the data discussed above with respect to national origin and LEP status can provide some insight into residential patterns with respect to religion given correlations between language, national origin, and religion, the resulting picture is merely a rough proxy. It is also a proxy that does not genuinely capture minority religious communities whose members are less likely to be recent immigrants. Data from the Urban Institute’s National Center for Charitable Statistics provides another complementary frame for analyzing residential patterns with respect to religious affiliation. Although congregations vary in size and not all congregants live in or even near the cities in which their congregations are located, the location of congregations of minority faiths still contributes to a broad impressionistic picture of where religious adherents live. Table 17 (in the appendix) reflects the presence of minority faith congregations and religiously affiliated non-profit organizations in Contra Costa County by city or unincorporated community. Table 17 (in the appendix) reveals concentrations of Buddhist congregations and organizations in the Cities of Moraga, Richmond, and San Ramon. There are concentrations of Hindu congregations and organizations in the Cities of Concord and San Ramon. Jewish congregations and organizations are concentrated in the Cities of Lafayette and, in particular, Walnut Creek. Muslim and Bahai congregations and organizations appear to be relatively 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 63 of ? evenly distributed across the County while there are too few Sikh and Ravidassia congregations and organizations to draw conclusions. Familial Status and Sex HUD provides geospatial maps depicting the percentage of households comprised of families with children to inform the Disparities in Access to Opportunity section of this Assessment but does not provide maps depicting the proportion of households that are female-headed families with children that have no male householder present. Often, in attempting to access housing through the private market, sex and familial status intersect to compound the discrimination faced by single mothers. Map 23 (see appendix) depicts the concentration of households headed by single mothers in the County by Census Tract. Areas of concentration include Richmond, North Richmond, San Pablo, Bay Point, Pittsburg, and Antioch. Those communities are also areas of high combined Black and Hispanic population. By contrast, central County, in general, and the portions of central County to the south of the City of Concord, in particular, have relatively low concentrations of single mothers. These tend to be more heavily White or White and Asian and Pacific Islander communities. Other relevant information (place-based investments, geographic mobility options, etc.) As is discussed in greater detail in the Publicly Supported Housing Analysis section of this Assessment, the Housing Authority of Contra Costa has adopted a two-tier rent ceiling system, setting higher rent ceilings for Housing Choice Vouchers in certain parts of Central and west County served by the Housing Authority. Subject to some exceptions, areas where vouchers are worth more tend to be higher opportunity areas as well as areas with lower concentrations of Black and Hispanic residents. Thus, the two-tier rent system is a positive initial step in promoting mobility for voucher holders who are disproportionately Black. Both private and public entities are involved in making place-based investments in predominantly Black and Hispanic areas where a legacy of disinvestment has perpetuated segregation. The impact of these investments is discussed in greater detail in connection with four contributing factors: displacement of residents due to economic pressures; lack of community revitalization strategies; lack of private investment in specific neighborhoods; and lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including services or amenities. In the context of the Region’s tight housing market, ensuring that place-based investments provide a platform for revitalization and stable integration without displacement rather than gentrification and racial succession requires a delicate balancing act. Parts of the City of Richmond have begun to experience gentrification pressures, and some community members and renters’ rights advocates in the City of Concord are concerned that a similar pattern may unfold in the Monument Corridor. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 64 of ? Contributing Factors to Segregation Community opposition Community opposition to affordable housing is a significant contributing factor to segregation in the Region and parts of Contra Costa County. California in general, and Contra Costa County in particular, have a strong Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY) movement. NIMBY sentiment often reflects a desire to preserve the quaint, semi-rural character of an area and protect against overcrowding, traffic, and the obstruction of views.9 In some cases, it can also indicate thinly-veiled racism under the guise of “preserving neighborhood character”; in other cases, even when not rooted in racism, it may have the same effect of exclusion. In California, NIMBYism is most often driven by a fear that increased housing construction will lower the values of existing homes.10 The problem is so extreme in California, that even renters feel the localized effects. These fluctuations in home value can lead to massive displacement (compounded by the already extreme market rent prices in the Bay Area), and even homelessness.11 In Contra Costa County, people in the Western portion of the County worry about Alameda and San Francisco County residents moving in and driving up housing costs.12 In contrast to the NIMBYers, who tend to be baby boomers, well-settled in their homes and with a vested interest in preserving “neighborhood quality,” a corresponding YIMBY (Yes In My Back Yard) movement has emerged. So-called YIMBYs tend to be millennials crippled by exorbitant rental prices and pushing for an increase in the supply of housing. The movement is tech- funded, with people like Yelp CEO Jeremy Stoppelman supporting the movement so that his employees will be able to afford to live near their jobs.13 9 Tanvi Misra, San Francisco Is So Expensive Even Renters Can Be NIMBYs, CITY LAB (Feb. 9, 2017), https://www.citylab.com/equity/2017/02/renters-in-expensive-cities-are-all-about-nimbyism/516021/. 10 Katy Murphy, ‘Homes for human beings’: Millennial-driven anti-NIMBY movement is winning with a simple message, Mercury News (Nov. 13, 2017, 3:10 AM), https://www.mercurynews.com/2017/11/12/homes-for- human-beings-millennial-driven-anti-nimby-movement-is-winning-with-a-simple-message/.(“California has built so few homes over the past four decades that it needs as many as 100,000 more per year in its high-cost metro areas – nearly double what it typically constructs – just to keep prices from rising faster than the national average, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office.”) 11 More than 25% of the national homeless population lives in California – roughly 114,000 people. Jennifer Medina, California Today: State’s Homeless Population Drives National Increase , NEW YORK TIMES (Dec. 21, 2017), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/21/us/california-today-states-homeless-population-drives-national- increase.html. Of additional concern is the California Ellis Act, which allows landlords to evict all of their tenants and “go out of business.” This law is commonly used to convert properties into condos which will not be subject to rent control. See chart and map of no-fault evictions via the Ellis Act. Ellis Act Evictions, ANTI EVICTION MAPPING PROJECT, http://www.antievictionmappingproject.net/ellis.html. 12 Aaron Davis, Contra Costa Communities Seek Solutions to Housing Crisis, NIMBYism , East Bay Times (Dec. 15, 2017), (https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/12/15/contra-costa-communities-seek-solutions-to-housing- crisis-nimbyism/. 13 Murphy, supra note 4. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 65 of ? The state recognizes NIMBYism as a problem as well, with so-called Anti-NIMBY legislation passing as far back as 1982,14 and amended in 2016 and 2017. The law as amended streamlines the approval process for low-income housing projects that meet existing zoning and environmental requirements, bypassing community opposition. The law also mandates that attorney fees be awarded to successful plaintiffs, and gives judges the power to fine cities that violate the law. Even though this law passed handily, NIMBY sentiment was felt even in the high echelons of state government, with senators from Marin County, Santa Barbara, Fullerton, and Lamorinda (a portmanteau of the Contra Costa cities of Lafayette, Moraga, and Orinda) – all areas with a strong NIMBY presence – voting against.15 A notable example of NIMBY and YIMBY forces at work in Contra Costa County took place in Lafayette from 2015-2017. In 2015, 315 moderate-income apartments called the Terraces of Lafayette was proposed in a large empty lot away from downtown. The city initially granted the project approval, but was met with significant pushback from residents and issues with the Environmental Impact Report. Consequently, it modified the project to 44 single-family homes called Deer Hill.16 This move gained pushback from both directions: NIMBYs and YIMBYs. Citizen group “Save Lafayette”17 filed a lawsuit to block the project alleging violations of state environmental review laws. It also launched a petition challenging the project, which would require the City Council to reconsider its approval or put a referendum on the ballot. Save Lafayette got enough signatures for the referendum measure, and when that was not placed on the ballot, they filed another lawsuit alleging violations of election law. These lawsuits were primarily motivated by desires to maintain open space and minimize traffic impacts. The presence of community opposition does not inevitably doom development proposals to failure. In recent years, multiple developments in the County that either included affordable housing or ultimately paid an in-lieu fee faced opposition but went on to be constructed. The Berrellesa Palms in the City of Martinez is a 48-unit, 100 percent affordable senior development. A lawsuit by neighbors under state environmental law and attacks in the press did not succeed in derailing the development. Although community opponents sought to restrict occupancy to Martinez residents, the developer and the County did not bend to that discriminatory request. Saranap Village is a market-rate development in an unincorporated area adjacent to Walnut Creek. Although there was no lawsuit challenging the development, neighbors voiced strong opposition in public meetings. The development ultimately went forward and paid an in-lieu fee under the County’s Inclusionary Housing Ordinance. Lastly, the Danville Town Council approved an otherwise market-rate development with a set-aside of 13 affordable units under California’s density bonus law despite community opposition. 14 The California Housing Accountability Act. 15 Nik Bonovich, Inside a Capitol Fight Over Housing, CAPITOL WEEKLY (Oct. 26, 2017), http://capitolweekly.net/inside-capitol-push-housing/. 16 Riley McDermid, A New Twist in the Struggle to Build an Embattled Housing Development in Lafayette, SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES (Sept. 18, 2015), https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/real- estate/2015/09/lafayette-housing-petition-voter-referendum.html. 17 SAVE LAFAYETTE, www.savelafayette.org. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 66 of ? These examples show that simultaneously that it is possible to overcome community opposition and that community opposition can add cost and delay that lead developers to explore opportunities in alternative areas where community opposition is less prevalent. At the same time, the San Francisco Bay Area Renters Federation (SFBARF)18 sued Lafayette for its abrupt change from affordable apartments to single-family homes. The suit claimed that Lafayette violated the Housing Accountability Act when it failed to approve the apartment project, as the property was zoned for high density housing. The result of the denial, they said, would be discrimination and a disproportionate effect on racial minorities through this failure to build apartments. The court dismissed the portion of the lawsuit alleging the city broke state housing law, but the city and SFBARF eventually settled the case. As part of the settlement, all city planning staffers were required to attend a training session on the Housing Accounting Act, and the property developer paid some of SFBARF’s fees. The single-family Deer Hill project was subsequently approved. Because a lack of affordable housing, which might be stymied by community opposition, does not contribute to segregation in the Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg or in the service area of the Richmond Housing Authority, community opposition is not a significant contributing factor to segregation in those communities. Because this Assessment did not reveal specific instances of community opposition derailing affordable housing development in predominantly non-Hispanic White neighborhoods within the City of Concord, community opposition is not a significant contributing factor to segregation in that city. Displacement of residents due to economic pressures Displacement of residents due to economic pressures is a major contributing factor to segregation in Contra Costa County and the Bay Area. The Bay Area has been facing a major affordable housing crisis for years due to factors including insufficient housing production, especially in predominantly non-Hispanic White high-opportunity areas, and a strong regional economy boosted by the growth of the technology industry. Rising housing prices have contributed to the displacement of many low-income residents in the Bay Area, particularly from Oakland19 and San Francisco and communities near these cities such as Richmond, where housing prices rose from an average of $199,000 in 2010 to $362,000 in 2015.20 There are also areas of displacement concentrated around BART stations from Hayward to Richmond that offer easy access to transit.21 Proximity to transit is an increasingly large factor in displacement. For example, the Monument Boulevard Corridor in Concord near the Concord BART station is relatively affordable but is experiencing soaring 18 SF BAY AREA RENTERS’ FEDERATION, www.sfbarf.org. 19 Devin Katayama, An Oakland Diaspora: What Drives Longtime Residents to Leave?, KQED NEWS (Mar. 2, 2016), https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2016/03/02/an-oakland-diaspora-what-drives-longtime-residents-to-leave/. 20 Karina Iofee and Bay Area News Group, Richmond’s African American population declining, Mercury News (Aug. 12, 2016), http://www.mercurynews.com/2015/05/22/richmonds-african-american-population- declining/. 21 Association of Bay Area Governments, Addressing Displacement in the Bay Area, available at https://abag.ca.gov/files/ABAGDisplacementWhitePaper.pdf. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 67 of ? rents due to its location. Consequently, its largely working-class Latino residents may be vulnerable to displacement.22 Rising rents contribute to evictions, especially in areas with lower household incomes.23 Developers may also seek to capitalize on rising property values by making improvements in housing in order to attract more affluent and largely white individuals.24 Displacement can occur as speculators rehabilitate homes to resell at higher prices, renovate rental units, or convert rental units into more expensive condominiums.25 Despite increasing housing prices, much of Contra Costa remains relatively affordable compared to the rest of the Bay Area.26 From 2011-2015, Contra Costa County gained thousands of net residents from Alameda County, San Mateo County, and San Francisco.27 In particular, many individuals are moving to the Eastern portions of Contra Costa County where housing prices are generally lower. Many Black residents have moved to east County communities or further out.28 In Antioch, the Black population has risen sharply since 2000, more than doubling from 2000 to 2010, while the Black population has declined in much of the Bay area including in the City of Richmond.29 As lower-income residents have been displaced from more expensive parts of the Bay Area, poverty in Eastern Contra Costa County has increased dramatically.30 From 2000-2014, the increase in poverty in Bay Point and Antioch was the highest in the Bay Area.31 Displacement is thus perpetuating segregation as low-income people of color increasingly concentrate in east County. The Urban Displacement Project (UDP), an initiative of the University of California, Berkeley and the University of California, Los Angeles conducted research on gentrification and displacement in the Bay Area. The UDP conducted a 2015 study which concluded that nearly 48 percent of Bay Area neighborhoods are experiencing displacement though not all 22 Celina Chan et al, Concord: Signs of Speculation in the Monument Corridor, CENTER FOR COMMUNITY INNOVATION AT UC BERKELEY (June 2015), http://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/concord_final.pdf. 23 Cat Schuknect, Richmond Has Contra Costa’s Highest Number of Sheriff-Enforced Evictions, Document Shows, RICHMOND CONFIDENTIAL (Dec. 5, 2016), http://richmondconfidential.org/2016/12/05/richmond-has-highest- rate-of-sheriff-enforced-evictions-in-county-doc. 24 Celina Chan, Viviana Lopez, Sydney Cespedes, & Nicole Montojo, Concord: Signs of Speculation in the Monument Corridor, http://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/concord_final.pdf. 25 Id. 26 Richard Scheinin, Bay Area rents: still rising, but starting to level off, Mercury News (Aug. 11, 2016, 10:44 PM) http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/07/21/bay-area-rents-still-rising-but-starting-to-level-off/. 27 Census Mapping Tool, https://flowsmapper.geo.census.gov. 28 Id. 29 Joaquin Palomino, As Bay Area Poverty Shifts from Cities to Suburbia, Services Lag, SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE, (Dec. 31, 2015), http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/As-poverty-spreads-to-new-Bay-Area-suburbs- 6730818.php. 30 Joaquin Palomino, As Bay Area Poverty Shifts From Cities to Suburbia, Services Lag, SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE (Jan. 2, 2016), http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/As-poverty-spreads-to-new-Bay-Area-suburbs- 6730818.php. 31 Race, Inequality, and the Resegregation of the Bay Area , URBAN HABITAT (Nov. 2016), http://urbanhabitat.org/sites/default/files/UH%20Policy%20Brief2016.pdf. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 68 of ? displacement is due to economic pressures.32 One key theme of the study is that displacement is a regional phenomenon linked to the broader economic pressures of housing costs and job markets. Western Contra Costa has experienced the most displacement and gentrification. Most areas of Richmond and El Cerrito are undergoing displacement or have already gentrified. Parts of Antioch, Brentwood, Concord, Hercules, Martinez, Moraga, Pinole, and Walnut Creek were also identified as undergoing displacement. Census tracts in unincorporated parts of the County including North Richmond, Contra Costa Centre, Alamo, and Crockett were also categorized as undergoing displacement or experiencing gentrification. Parts of Moraga and Walnut Creek were classified as census tracts with advanced exclusion, indicating that these areas have a very low proportion of low income households and little in-migration of low-income households. Lack of community revitalization strategies Lack of community revitalization strategies is a significant contributing factor to the increasing segregation of Black and Hispanic residents in the Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg, the nearby unincorporated community of Bay Point, and the east County cities of Brentwood and Oakley, as well as of the Hispanic community in the Monument Corridor in the City of Concord. A lack of decent jobs and a slow recovery from the foreclosure crisis in these portions of the County has contributed to the increased concentration of poverty and of people of color in these communities. From 1945 until 2012, California operated local redevelopment agencies (RDAs), designed to revitalize blighted neighborhoods and, importantly, devote 20 percent of allocated funds to affordable housing.33 In response to budget concerns, the RDAs were disbanded in 2012, and successor agencies were designated to wind down the RDA activities.34 The lack of community revitalization strategies is a product of this loss of funding. In concluding that a lack of community revitalization strategies is contributing to segregation, this Assessment is not stating that community revitalization strategies are absent but rather that the extent of those strategies is not commensurate with the total need. In discussing community revitalization strategies, communities within the County where particularly noteworthy activity has taken place are highlighted, including communities that do not directly receive CDBG funds from HUD. Contra Costa County In Contra Costa County at large, which manages unincorporated communities within the County, the successor agency is the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County.35 The 32Urban Displacement Project, University of California, Berkeley, Executive Summary, http://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/images/urban_displacement_project_- _executive_summary.pdf. 33 Casey Blount et al, Redevelopment Agencies in California: History, Benefits, Excesses, and Closure, ECONOMIC MARKET ANALYSIS WORKING PAPER SERIES (Jan. 2014), https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/redevelopment_whitepaper.pdf. 34 Id. 35 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OVERSIGHT BOARD, http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/4308/Contra-Costa-County- Oversight-Board. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 69 of ? successor agency’s activities are further supervised by the Contra Costa County Oversight Board.36 The oversight board is independent, and has a fiduciary duty to contractual parties which had agreements with the previous RDAs.37 The oversight board also has a fiduciary duty to the taxing entities that receive distributions of property tax that is paid out of former redevelopment project areas.38 The oversight board is further supervised by the Director of the California Department of Finance, who may disapprove or modify actions taken by the oversight board.39 There are projects in Rodeo and at the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station which were assumed by the successor agency.40 The County has secured a development partner for Bay Point and is currently seeking a partner for Rodeo. The County has also undertaken a Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative, in cooperation with its partners, the cities of Antioch, Concord, Hercules, Martinez, Oakley, and Pittsburg.41 Bay Point is an unincorporated community, so oversight is conducted by the County. After the dissolution of the California RDAs, a plan to construct transit-adjacent housing and retail space near the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station, known as Orbisonia Heights, stalled indefinitely.42 The demolished plot of land attracted squatters and transients.43 Several years passed, but as of March 2017, the Contra Costa County Housing Successor to the Redevelopment Agency has selected a developer to rekindle the Orbisonia Heights project.44 North Richmond is an unincorporated community, so oversight is conducted by the County. A 42-unit affordable housing complex (accepting Section 8 vouchers) is under construction in downtown North Richmond, and proponents hope that it will revitalize the city center.45 The Heritage Point Development is being built across the street from an existing senior apartment complex, and near the Contra Costa Health Services’ North Richmond Center for Health.46 Hopefully, construction will attract new residents, businesses and, importantly, a grocery 36 Id. 37 Id. 38 Id. 39 Id. 40 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES, http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/6413/Development- Opportunities. 41 Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative, Contra Costa County, http://www.co.contra- costa.ca.us/4437/Northern-Waterfront-Economic-Development. 42 Sean Maher, Project to Revitalize Bay Point Stalled Indefinitely Without Redevelopment, THE MERCURY NEWS (Jan. 22, 2012), https://www.mercurynews.com/2012/01/22/project-to-revitalize-bay-point-stalled-indefinitely- without-redevelopment/. 43 Id. 44 Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals, Orbisonia Heights Site, Contra Costa County, http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/44957. 45 Sam Richards, ‘Catalyst’ North Richmond Apartment Project Moves Forward, EAST BAY TIMES (Dec. 16, 2017), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/12/16/catalyst-north-richmond-apartment-project-moves-forward/. 46 Id. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 70 of ? store – as the area is a food desert.47 Specific outreach will be conducted to connect current North Richmond residents with the new units.48 Pleasant Hill - The successor to the Pleasant Hill Redevelopment Agency is the City Council of Pleasant Hill.49 The Pleasant Hill RDA has had one of Contra Costa’s most significant success stories, in terms of revitalizing the community. Under the regime of the Pleasant Hill RDA, the city saw vast improvements to its once-dormant downtown area.50 In its 39 years of operation, the RDA leveraged $66 million to help create over $600 million in private property value, completing 15 major projects and six major schoolyard redevelopments.51 The RDA also helped fund over 400 affordable housing units in Pleasant Hill, as part of its statutory mandate that 20 percent of funds go toward affordable housing.52 Richmond – The successor to the Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency is the City of Richmond.53 The Richmond RDA was heavily involved in projects such as the BART redesign, sidewalk replacement, and the Nevin Park renewal, but many of these plans were derailed during the recession.54 After the dissolution of the California RDAs, nonprofits like the Richmond Main Street Initiative stepped in, organizing music events and farmers’ markets, and giving guidance to small business owners.55 The Richmond RDA had several pending housing projects: Metro Walk, Chesley Mutual Housing, Easter Hill, Trinity Plaza/Macdonald Senior Housing, Miraflores, Lillie Mae Jones Plaza, Nevin Court, Filbert Townhomes, Arbors Preservation Project, and Carquinez Apartments.56 Most of these affordable housing projects seem to have been completed under the supervision of the successor agency, with the notable exception of Filbert Townhomes. An Inspector General report found that the City of Richmond did not adequately support its use of HUD-funded expenses in constructing the Filbert Townhomes.57 Although the buildings 47 Id. See also USDA Food Desert Map, https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-access-research-atlas/go- to-the-atlas/. 48 Id. 49 Redevelopment Successor Agency, Overview, https://www.ci.pleasant-hill.ca.us/184/Redevelopment- Successor-Agency. 50 Bay Area News Group, Downtown Dreams: Antioch Looks Again to Revitalize Historic Rivertown, EAST BAY TIMES (Mar. 14, 2014), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2014/03/14/downtown-dreams-antioch-looks-again-to- revitalize-historic-rivertown/. 51 Pleasant Hill Redevelopment Agency, A history of the Redevelopment Agency and its accomplishments, https://www.ci.pleasant-hill.ca.us/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/1167. 52 Id. 53 City of Richmond as Successor Agency To The Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency , http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/97/Successor-Agency-To-Redevelopment. 54 Elly Schmidt-Hopper, Long Neglected, Richmond’s Downtown Is Being Slowly Reborn, RICHMOND CONFIDENTIAL (Dec. 21, 2014), http://richmondconfidential.org/2014/12/21/long-neglected-richmonds-downtown-is-being- slowly-reborn/. 55 Id. 56 What Redevelopment Means to Richmond, City of Richmond, http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/6846. 57 United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, The City of Richmond, CA, Did Not Adequately Support Its Use of HUD-Funded Expenses for Its Filbert Phase 1 and Filbert Phase 2 Activities, 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 71 of ? were constructed, the City severely overspent funds on the project; it also removed the requirement that HOME funded units be occupied by low income families for 15 years, misrepresented the status of the project, and withdrew funds without an agreement in place.58 The City of Richmond was required to repay the funds and implement city policies to prevent this situation from occurring again.59 Antioch The successor to the Antioch Redevelopment Agency is the Antioch City Council.60 As factories started closing in the 1960s, people started moving away from the industrial town of Antioch, and the downtown area suffered with the loss of retailers following residents.61 Past revitalization efforts have been largely considered failures; the constant recipe suggested over the years has been the addition of high-density housing downtown, which would provide nearby customers for shops and restaurants.62 Other proposed strategies include a downtown park which could host festivals and farmers’ markets, or closing off some streets to create a pedestrian mall.63 The four east County cities (Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley, and Pittsburg) have also launched a website to connect businesses and development opportunities in the region.64 The website promotes available sites, demographics, and business reports, and allows side-by-side comparison of communities to highlight the advantages of locating a business there.65 Concord The successor to the Concord Redevelopment Agency is the Concord City Council.66 Concord has recently seen an influx in restaurants and businesses, drawing developers to put in high density housing downtown and near public transit.67 The City Council, acting as the successor agency, is authorized to sell the properties, keep them for future development, or retain them https://www.hudoig.gov/reports-publications/memorandums/city-of-richmond-ca-did-not-adequately- support-its-use-of-hud. 58 Id. 59 Id. 60 Boards and Commissions, ANTIOCH, CALIFORNIA, http://www.ci.antioch.ca.us/CityGov/Oversight/. 61 Bay Area News Group, Downtown Dreams: Antioch Looks Again to Revitalize Historic Rivertown, EAST BAY TIMES (Mar. 14, 2014), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2014/03/14/downtown-dreams-antioch-looks-again-to- revitalize-historic-rivertown/. 62 Id. 63 Id. 64 EAST COUNTY 4 YOUR BUSINESS, http://www.eastcounty4you.com/. 65 Antioch Economic Development Updates, ANTIOCH ON THE MOVE (Nov. 20, 2017), https://antiochonthemove.com/antioch-economic-development-updates/. 66 Lisa P. White, Former Concord Redevelopment Agency Properties Eyed for Housing, East Bay Times (Aug. 29, 2017), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/08/29/former-concord-redevelopment-agency-properties-eyed- for-housing/. 67 Roland Li, Developers to Break Ground on 180 Apartments Next to East Bay BART Station , SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES (Aug. 25, 2016), https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/real-estate/2016/08/concord- housing-development-legacy-syres.html. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 72 of ? for government use.68 Five former RDA properties have been sold to mixed-use high density housing and retail developers, and three other high density housing projects have been initiated independent of the former RDA program.69 There is one other proposed multifamily high density housing project in the works.70 Three other RDA properties have been ceded to companies to be developed into parking lots and car dealership expansions.71 Pittsburg Pittsburg’s general approach has been to sell off its portfolio of properties left over from the RDA.72 However, in early 2018, city staff suggested that 1595 Railroad Avenue and the adjacent lot would be better suited to aiding BART and city transit goals.73 Staff prepared a report to recommend that the properties be used to address worsening traffic conditions, pedestrian safety concerns, and possible BART station parking.74 The City Council voted on the matter pursuant to the staff report, and resolved that the land was needed for a public purpose and would be retained by the City to be used to alleviate traffic and other concerns, as proposed by the staff.75 Lack of private investments in specific neighborhoods Lack of private investment in specific neighborhoods is a contributing factor to segregation in areas of Black and Hispanic population concentration in west and east County communities. One indicator of a lack of private investment in low-income neighborhoods is the distribution of grocery stores across a residential area. Traveling more than one mile in urban areas and ten miles in rural areas to a grocery store classifies an area as a food desert. In Maps 25-28 (in the appendix), the green coloring indicates food deserts based on that criteria, and the yellow coloring indicates areas where more than 100 housing units do not have a vehicle and are more than ½ mile from the nearest supermarket in urban areas (20 miles in rural areas). 68 Lisa P. White, Former Concord Redevelopment Agency Properties Eyed for Housing, East Bay Times (Aug. 29, 2017), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/08/29/former-concord-redevelopment-agency-properties-eyed- for-housing/. 69 Roland Li, Developers to Break Ground on 180 Apartments Next to East Bay BART Station , SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES (Aug. 25, 2016), https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/real-estate/2016/08/concord- housing-development-legacy-syres.html; Lisa P. White, Concord: Former Redevelopment Properties Eyed for Housing, EAST BAY TIMES (Aug. 29, 2017), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/08/29/former-concord- redevelopment-agency-properties-eyed-for-housing/. 70 Id. 71 Id. 72 Aaron Davis, Pittsburg Suggests Public Uses for Lot Slated to Be Sold to Seeno, EAST BAY TIMES (Jan. 11, 2018), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2018/01/11/pittsburg-suggests-public-uses-for-lot-slated-to-be-sold-to- seeno/. 73 Id. 74 Id. 75 Resolution 18-, City Council of the City of Pittsburg, (Apr. 2, 2018), http://apps.ci.pittsburg.ca.us/sirepub/cache/2/efi4lqecivsxxzfdaglm21yf/350526311092018092438436.PDF. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 73 of ? These food deserts line up roughly with the expanded selection of R/ECAPs identified elsewhere in this report (accounting for the higher average cost of living in the Bay Area), including the Iron Triangle area of Richmond, Antioch/Pittsburg, Bay Point, and North Richmond/San Pablo. Pharmacies are often located within grocery stores, but to supplement the food deserts previously identified, there are an abundance of CVS and Walgreens pharmacies available throughout the County. Even so, especially in the western part of the County, the pharmacies tend to cluster along the main highway, leaving significant pockets without access. The Iron Triangle of Richmond, in particular, seems to be lacking in pharmacies, as does downtown Antioch north of the California Delta Highway. Entire towns such as Hercules, El Sobrante, and Martinez lack adequate pharmacy access except along their town borders, formed by the highway. It is worth noting that Kaiser Permanente insurance is only accepted at Kaiser pharmacies, but they seem to be fairly well-distributed throughout the County. Another indicator of private investment is the distribution of banks. There are many different banks to choose from in the County, including credit unions.76 Overall, it seems that there are many banking options in the County, and they are well distributed across population centers. Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including services or amenities Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including services or amenities, is a significant contributing factor to the segregation of Black and Hispanic residents in Contra Costa County, the City of Antioch, and the service area of the Richmond Housing Authority. Another indicator of a lack of public investment in certain neighborhoods is the condition of paved roads and sidewalks. Local residents can report potholes and other road/traffic problems on www.seeclickfix.com. Pittsburg has a Go City app to serve a similar purpose. The interactive map is not a perfect resource, however, due to reporting bias (people in affluent neighborhoods are more likely to report problems, and more likely to have the computer access to do so), as well as the lack of sorting by date (perhaps some of the older reports have since been resolved) and general knowledge about town of the reporting function. Nevertheless, per this reporting, it seems clear that affluent areas like San Ramon, Walnut Creek, Lafayette, Moraga, Orinda, and Brentwood have few reports of potholes or poor road conditions, although the residents do tend to use the website to report other issues such as illegal dumping, graffiti, and homeless camps. Unsurprisingly, less affluent areas such as Antioch and Richmond have more road issues reported. The Go City app in the City of Pittsburg similarly allows for the reporting of issues like potholes. Another problem with evaluating the quality of sidewalks in much of the County is the fact that in a number of areas, owners are required to fix sidewalk problems themselves. As such, 76 Examples include BAC Community Bank, Wells Fa rgo, Opus Bank, Citibank, Bank of the West, US Bank, Chase Bank, Fremont Bank, First Northern California Credit Union, Mechanics Bank, Umpqua Bank, Pacific Service Credit Union, BBVA Compass, Westamerica Bank, First Republic Bank, Provident Credit Union, a nd Heritage Bank of Commerce. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 74 of ? municipalities are unlikely to have a comprehensive record of sidewalk problems, as it is not their responsibility to fix them. In poorer neighborhoods, the responsibility of owners to fix the sidewalk can cut both ways. Owners in poorer neighborhoods are less likely to have the necessary resources to fix the problem. At the same time, poorer neighborhoods are more likely to have rental properties, and the owners of those properties probably can afford the repairs, as long as they are aware of the problem. The City of Pittsburg is an exception, and its government is responsible for maintenance of some sidewalks. Lack of regional cooperation Lack of local and regional cooperation is a contributing factor to segregation. Many high opportunity areas with predominantly Non-Hispanic White populations in Contra Costa have been vehemently opposed to state and local affordable housing development in their cities.77 For example, one city official from Lafayette, which has a population that is 84 percent white and only .7 percent Black told a local paper,” as projects come down the line that may be denser and encroach upon single-family neighborhoods in a way that people aren’t comfortable with. I know my public officials want to have the residents know very clearly that it is the doing of the state and not the city.”78 Lafayette and Orinda, and many other local Bay Area governments opposed SB 827 a state measure that would have allowed for greater density development near transit sites. Though it is unclear whether the measure would have improved affordability, Lafayette’s opposition came out of a desire to maintain single-family zoning and keep out larger, affordable housing complexes. Further, Lafayette has only 15 units listed as affordable to low income residents and available to non-seniors according to the Contra Costa Housing Authority.79 In 2016, activists sued Lafayette after a developer scrapped a plan to build 315 affordable units due to pressure from the city.80 The developer replaced the plan with a plan to build forty-four single-family homes. Though the activists ultimately lost the lawsuit, the proceedings laid bare Lafayette’s vehement objections to the development of any affordable housing.81 Opponents of residential racial integration has historically used calls for local control to mask their discriminatory intent. Thus, localism in Contra Costa is impeding integration. Land use and zoning laws Land use and zoning laws are a significant contributing factor to the segregation of Black and Hispanic residents throughout the County and the Region. People of color disproportionately occupy high-density housing, which can generally be built only in areas zoned for multi- 77 News and Talk Tops in Overall Local Radio Market , SANTA CRUZ SENTINEL (Mar. 10, 2006), http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/article/NE/20180419/NEWS/180419655. 78 Id. 79 Rachel Swan, Renters Group Sues to Force Suburbs to Add Housing Amid Shortage , SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE (May 2, 2016), https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Renters-group-tries-to-force-suburbs-to-add- 7386206.php. 80 Id. 81 Id. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 75 of ? family homes, multiple dwellings or single-family homes on small lots. This tends to segregate people of color into the municipal areas zoned for high-density housing. One of the most effective tools to combat segregation is an inclusionary zoning ordinance, which requires a certain percentage of multi-family units to be reserved for low-income tenants. California’s A.B. 1505 authorizes localities to adopt inclusionary zoning ordinances, with requirements that in lieu fees,82 off-site development,83 and other alternatives be available to developers in implementing the law. All of the unincorporated areas of the County fall under the Contra Costa County zoning ordinance, which is an inclusionary zoning ordinance with options for an in lieu fee and off- site development. Four municipalities do not have inclusionary zoning or density bonus legislation: Antioch, El Cerrito, Martinez, and Moraga. Of the fifteen municipalities with some form of inclusionary zoning: three do not impose residential unit requirements but rather offer density bonuses or incentives (Oakley, Orinda, and San Pablo); eleven permit developers to pay an in-lieu fee instead of complying with affordable housing unit requirements (Brentwood, Clayton, Concord, Danville, Hercules, Lafayette, Pittsburg, Pleasant Hill, Richmond, San Ramon, and Walnut Creek); and twelve permit off-site construction of affordable housing units (Brentwood, Clayton, Concord, Danville,84 Hercules, Lafayette, Pinole, Pittsburg, Pleasant Hill, San Pablo, San Ramon, and Walnut Creek). The greatest concentrations of both low-income and non-white populations are in Antioch, Concord, Hercules, Pinole, Pittsburg, Richmond, San Pablo, and Walnut Creek (low-income only).85 Brentwood, El Cerrito (low-income only), Martinez (low-income only), Oakley, and Pleasant Hill (low-income only) may be counted as well; however, their demographic maps (see appendix) show less obvious concentrations and more variation between city subdivisions, making segregation a less obvious concern. Contrastingly, Clayton, Lafayette, Orinda, Martinez, and Moraga have very low populations of low-income people of color. Zoning ordinances and land use are likely large determinants of this. Antioch’s high and medium density residential zones lie mostly within the northern and western parts of the city.86 This correlates with the locations of higher concentrations of low- income households and non-white populations in Antioch. Concord’s zoning map is similar, with high and medium density residential zones correlating with higher concentrations of low-income and non-white populations.87 These are mostly located to the west and slightly south of the city center, known as Monument Corridor. 82 (paying a penalty in lieu of constructing affordable units) 83 (building a separate building with affordable units) 84 Only for projects subject to inclusionary zoning that have less than 13 units/acre 85 Mapping Displacement and Gentrification in the San Francisco Bay Area , URBAN DISPLACEMENT PROJECT (2017), http://www.urbandisplacement.org/map/sf. 86 City of Antioch General Plan: Draft Map for Analysis, CITY OF ANTIOCH, GIS DIVISION (2005), http://www.ci.antioch.ca.us/CityGov/PublicWorks/GIS/docs/General -Plan.pdf. 87 City of Concord Zoning Map, CITY OF CONCORD (Aug. 23, 2012), http://www.cityofconcord.org/pdf/dept/planning/zoning_mapbook.pdf. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 76 of ? Concord has very few areas zoned for high density residences, and the city is mostly zoned for single family residences. The pattern also shows up in the western area of Hercules near the San Pablo Bay (with medium density and low density multifamily residence zones correlating with areas that are more heavily low-income and non-white households). However, the pattern does not extend to the southeastern and northeastern areas of Hercules (which show a pattern of single family zoning or low density multifamily zoning with high concentrations of non-white populations but less concentrated percentages of low-income households).88 Notably, the only medium density, multifamily zone in Hercules is both heavily non-white and majority (63 percent or more) low-income households (the area including and surrounding Village Parkway). Pinole is mostly zoned for suburban residential housing.89 Some clusters are zoned for medium density, high density, and very high density (only one area); these are found in the northwestern area (off the bay and the San Pablo Avenue Corridor), and the middle of the city in two areas lining Pinole Valley Road (also called Tennent Road in some areas). All of these areas appear to be approximately 57 percent non-white and between 37 and 63 percent low- income households, but almost all of Pinole demonstrates these same features. Therefore, it remains difficult to conclude that zoning coincides with concentrations of non-white and low- income households. Pittsburg’s zoning proves fairly mosaic and well-distributed.90 The only area that may be said to contain a concentration of medium and high density residential zones is in the east of the city, south of the California Delta Highway, east of Railroad Avenue, and north of Stoneman Avenue. This area contains at least 63 percent low-income households, but contains only a minority non-white population. Majority non-white populations are located north, northwest, and west of the area described previously; these areas are zoned in varying and mosaic-like fashion, but, where zoned for residences, mostly for single family residences. Richmond remains mostly zoned for single family residences and industrial use.91 Multifamily residence zones lie in the center of the city, near Carlson Boulevard, Nevin Avenue, Ohio Avenue, Roosevelt Avenue, and the western side of Highway 80. These areas correlate with higher concentrations of low-income households and non-white residents. 88 City of Hercules Land Use and Zoning Map, CITY OF HERCULES (Oct. 2014), http://www.ci.hercules.ca.us/Home/ShowDocument?id=193. 89 City of Pinole Zoning Map, CITY OF PINOLE (Nov. 16, 2010), http://www.ci.pinole.ca.us/planning/docs/Pinole_Zoning_2010.pdf. 90 City of Pittsburg Zoning, CITY OF PITTSBURG, BUREAU OF LAND MGMT. (2010), http://cityofpittsburg.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=54f347e4fe8b405ab2b93b922bcce 89c. 91 City of Richmond Zoning, CITY OF RICHMOND GEOGRAPHIC INFO. SYS., http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/3624 (last visited Nov. 29, 2017). 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 77 of ? San Pablo also shows a majority of zoning for single family residences; multifamily residence zones lie on the borders of the “main” north-to-south corridor of San Pablo, and in the eastern “appendage” of the municipality that juts from this longitudinal area.92 Urban Displacement’s maps (see appendix, Map 24) of San Pablo are fairly monochromatic, showing that close to 90 percent of its population is non-white, and between 50 and 76 percent is low-income households. Therefore, it remains difficult to conclude that locations of single and multifamily residence zones correlate with locations of concentrations of non-white and low-income residents. Finally, Walnut Creek is also overwhelmingly zoned for single family residences.93 Most multifamily residence zones lie near Civic Park in the middle of the city, off of Interstate 680 (running north to south through the city), and in the northern and slightly eastern part of the city near Heather Farm Community Park and Bancroft Elementary School. However, most of Walnut Creek does not contain a majority non-white population, and only the area near Civic Park with multifamily residence zones (an area east of Interstate 680) shows a concentration of low-income households. Therefore, Walnut Creek does not exemplify clear evidence of correlation between zoned areas and concentrations of non-white and low-income households. Zones for moderate and high density multifamily housing in Brentwood lie in areas that, at maximum, reach 50.2 percent low-income households and 62.1 percent non-white populations.94 Some high density multifamily zones lie in areas with 33.2 percent low-income households and 38.1 percent non-white population.95 Though most of the city is zoned for family residences,96 it remains difficult to conclude that zoning correlates with segregation or concentrations of sizeable non-white and low-income populations. In El Cerrito, the largest percentage of non-white population is 69.8 percent, and the largest percentage of low-income households is 70 percent.97 The latter statistic is associated with an area zoned entirely for multifamily residences.98 No zones on the northeast or east side of Elm and Richmond streets (loose boundaries) are zoned for multifamily residences.99 However, the remaining areas zoned for multifamily residences, and even those with single 92 City of San Pablo Zoning Map, CITY OF SAN PABLO (Mar. 17, 2004), http://www.ci.san- pablo.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/244 93 Zoning Map, CITY OF WALNUT CREEK (June 13, 2017), http://www.walnut- creek.org/home/showdocument?id=13123. 94 Compare Zoning Map, CITY OF BRENTWOOD CMTY. DEV. DEP’T (Nov. 11, 2015) [hereinafter City of Brentwood Zoning Map], http://www.brentwoodca.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=35194, with URBAN DISPLACEMENT SF MAP, http://www.urbandisplacement.org/map/sf#. 95 Compare City of Brentwood Zoning Map, supra note 121, with URBAN DISPLACEMENT SF MAP, supra note 89. 96 City of Brentwood Zoning Map, supra note 89. 97 URBAN DISPLACEMENT SF MAP, supra note 89. 98 Compare Zoning Map, CITY OF EL CERRITO (Feb. 2008) [hereinafter City of El Cerrito Zoning Map], http://www.el-cerrito.org/DocumentCenter/Home/View/817, with URBAN DISPLACEMENT SF MAP, supra note 89. 99 City of El Cerrito Zoning Map, supra note 93. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 78 of ? family residences, remain fairly mixed in percentages of non-white and low-income demographics. Oakley offers only six, small multifamily residence zones in a city primarily zoned for commercial and industrial use, recreation, and single family residences.100 Two of these zones lie in an area characterized by 39.4 percent low-income households, and 64.4 percent non- white population; two others lie in an area showing 43.3 percent low-income households and 61.9 percent non-white population; the last two lie in an area with 57.1 percent low-income households and 55.6 percent non-white population.101 The information offered by Urban Displacement for these zones encompasses too much other land area (and, therefore, dozens of other zones) to draw any final conclusions, but the non-white and low-income populations have mostly increased across Oakley between 1990 and 2013, and as of 2013 the largest concentrations of these demographics are in the areas encompassing the six zones mentioned previously.102 Finally, the city of Pleasant Hill has placed most multifamily residence zones near the city’s boundaries.103 The southern zones appear to be of minimal concern, as the non-white population does not even constitute 20 percent (though the low-income household percentage is nearly 40 percent).104 Most if not all high density multifamily residence zones are located in areas showing 51.2 or 54.4 percent low-income households, and 36 and 44.9 percent non-white population, the highest in Pleasant Hill.105 Medium and low density multifamily zones remain small and scattered in areas showing less concentration of non- white and low-income households and populations.106 State law formerly restricted, in part, the ability of localities to adopt equitable zoning and land use policies as a result of the decision of the California Court of Appeal in Palmer/Sixth Street Properties v. City of Los Angeles. In that decision, the court held that the application of mandatory inclusionary zoning requirements to new rental housing was a form of rent control in violation of California’s Costa-Hawkins Act. This decision effectively blocked robust inclusionary zoning for several years until the legislature overturned the court decision in 2017. Now, for the first time in nearly a decade, California municipalities have the opportunity to ensure that their zoning and land use policies truly foster inclusivity, residential integration, and housing affordability. 100 Zoning Map City of Oakley, Contra Costa County, California, City of Oakley (Aug. 11, 2015), http://www.ci.oakley.ca.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Oakley_Zoning_Updating_08-22-17.pdf. 101 Compare id., with URBAN DISPLACEMENT SF MAP, supra note 89. 102 See URBAN DISPLACEMENT SF MAP, supra note 89. 103 City of Pleasant Hill Zoning Map, CITY OF PLEASANT HILL (May 16, 2011), https://www.ci.pleasant- hill.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/276. 104 Compare id., with URBAN DISPLACEMENT SF MAP, supra note 89. 105 Compare City of Pleasant Hill Zoning Map, supra note 98, with URBAN DISPLACEMENT SF MAP, supra note 89. 106 Compare City of Pleasant Hill Zoning Map, supra note 98, with URBAN DISPLACEMENT SF MAP, supra note 89. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 79 of ? Lending discrimination Table 18 (see appendix) lists, by race, the percentage of applications denied for various types of loans in the Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley region in 2016, based on Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data from the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.107 The applications for Blacks and Hispanics (or Latinos) are uniformly denied at higher rates than those of Whites or Asians. Lending discrimination is a major contributing factor to segregation. When minorities are unable to obtain loans, they are far more likely to be relegated to certain areas of the community.108 While de jure segregation (segregation that is created and enforced by the law) is currently illegal, the drastic difference in loans denied between whites and minorities perpetuates de facto segregation, which is segregation that is not created by the law, but which forms a pattern as a result of various outside factors, including former laws. Similarly, lending discrimination is a significant contributing factor to R/ECAPs, as minorities are less likely to be homeowners than whites and thus more likely to be concentrated in high- poverty communities. Lending discrimination directly contributes to economic segregation, which prevents minorities from living in thriving areas and instead relegates them to struggling neighborhoods. Lending discrimination is also a contributing factor to disparities in access to opportunity. Wealth is commonly derived from home equity, particularly for minority families. Housing equity comprises two-thirds of wealth for the average households.109 The inability to purchase a home will not only impact the current applicants, but also future generations to come. The wealth gap persists across educational boundaries. For example, black families with a college degree have, on average, one-eighth of the wealth of white families with a college degree.110 Thus, access to housing is key to minority households, even those whose heads of household have attained degrees in higher education. Because blacks and Hispanics in the region are denied loans at far higher rights than white and Asians, their families are far more likely to have less access to quality education, healthcare, and employment. Lending discrimination also greatly contributes to disproportionate housing needs, as class groups who struggle to obtain access to loans are more likely to experience housing problems such as cost burdens, overcrowding, and substandard housing. When banks and other financial institutions deny minorities’ loan applications, those groups cannot achieve 107 Data can be accessed at https://www.ffiec.gov/hmda/default.htm. 108 Angela Hanks, Danyelle Solomon, & Christian E. Weller, Systemic Inequality: How America’s Structural Racism Helped Create the Black-White Wealth Gap, American Progress (Feb. 21, 2018, 9:03AM), https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/race/reports/2018/02/21/447051/systematic-inequality/. 109 Janelle Jones, The racial wealth gap: How African-Americans have been shortchanged out of the materials to build wealth, Economic Policy Institute (Feb. 12, 2017, 12:01 PM), https://www.epi.org/blog/the-racial-wealth- gap-how-african-americans-have-been-shortchanged-out-of-the-materials-to-build-wealth/. 110 Id. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 80 of ? home ownership and instead must turn to the rental market. As Contra Costa’s rental housing market grows increasingly unaffordable, blacks and Hispanics are disproportionately impacted. HMDA data does not track denials based on disability, thus it is difficult to determine if lending discrimination is a contributing factor to disability and access. Location and type of affordable housing The location of accessible housing is not a significant contributing factor to fair housing issues in Contra Costa County. Although it is not possible to precisely map the location of accessible housing in the County, it tends to exist where there are concentrations of new, multifamily housing and where there are concentrations of publicly supported housing. These two dimensions cut in somewhat contradictory directions. The American Community Survey does not facilitate the disaggregation of housing units by units in structure and year structure built together but does allow a look at those two data points separately. As the maps (see appendix, Maps 29 & 30) reflect, there is some overlap: both newer and denser housing tends to be clustered in parts of central County including Concord, Contra Costa Centre, and Walnut Creek; and in San Ramon in southern Contra Costa County. There are concentrations of new, predominantly single-family homes in east County and concentrations of older multifamily housing in west County. The parts of the County with more new, multifamily housing offer relatively high access to opportunity in countywide perspective. By contrast, publicly supported housing, as reflected in Map 31 (see appendix), is much more concentrated in East and West Counties, places with lower access to opportunity but also the very places that do not have concentrations of new, multi-family development. The good news is that between these two categories of (likely accessible) housing, there is a wide dispersion across the County. There are some exceptions, including parts of central County to the west of Walnut Creek and between Walnut Creek and San Ramon. These gaps tend to decrease access to opportunity as the locations with less accessible housing tend to have very high levels of opportunity. Nonetheless, the number of gaps is modest, and the areas with accessible housing include high opportunity areas. When affordability is not factored into the equation, the location of accessible housing does not appear to significantly contribute to fair housing issues. According to local data, accessible and affordable housing is fairly well-distributed across the major population centers in the County, per Map 32 (see appendix). At least one affordable, accessible option is available in nearly every major community in Contra Costa, with the notable exceptions of Moraga and Alamo. Alamo and Moraga’s status draws attention to the lack of affordable options in the wealthy, predominantly white suburbs, especially regrettable because of the convenient proximity to the BART in Orinda and Walnut Creek via bus connections (BART stations marked by the “house” icon on the next page). 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 81 of ? Loss of Affordable Housing Loss of affordable housing greatly contributes to segregation and the creation of R/ECAPS. In California, state law mandates that jurisdictions evaluate affordable housing stock that is at- risk of conversion to market-rate housing as part of the Housing Element of a comprehensive General Plan. Housing elements conducted by incorporated cities in Contra Costa as well as by the County government indicate that thousands of affordable units in the County are at- risk of conversion to market-rate housing.111 If low-income and minority families are priced out of their current homes, they will be forced to relocate to R/ECAPS, further perpetuating segregation in Contra Costa. The loss of affordable housing negatively affects access to opportunity. Rents have increased dramatically in Contra Costa County, pricing many tenants out of their homes. Since 2000, median rents in the County have increased by 25 percent, while median renters’ incomes have decreased by three percent.112 Low-income renters in Contra Costa are severely rent burdened, spending 57 percent of their paycheck on rent.113 This burden prevents families from allocating resources to other needs, such as food, transportation, health, and education. The loss of affordable housing is also a contributing factor to disproportionate housing needs. Market-rate development has led to the loss of affordable housing in cities such as El Cerrito and Richmond.114 According to a 2017 California Housing Partnership study, the County needs 30,939 more affordable housing units to meet the needs of low-income renters.115 When low-income and minority families do not have access to affordable housing, they are more likely to experience live in substandard accommodations with housing problems. Additionally, loss of affordable housing impacts publicly supported housing, as demand for programs such as HCV and public housing increases with housing costs. According to a 111 See City of Richond General Plan 2030 5th Cycle Housing Element Update (2015-2023), http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/31210; City of Concord Housing Element Update—Final 2014-2022, http://www.cityofconcord.org/pdf/projects/housingElement/11072014.pdf; and Contra Costa County Housing Element 2014, http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/documentcenter/view/30916. 112 California Housing Partnership, Contra Costa County Renters In Crisis: A Call For Action, https://1p08d91kd0c03rlxhmhtydpr-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp- content/uploads/2017/05/ContraCostaCounty2017.pdf 113 Id. 114 Sam Levin, Low-Income Tenants to Be Directly Displaced by Development in El Cerrito, EAST BAY EXPRESS (July 7, 2015), https://www.eastbayexpress.com/oakland/low-income-tenants-to-be-directly-displaced-by- development-in-el-cerrito/Content?oid=4402578; Sawsan Morrar, Richmond Residents Fighting Eviction, Gentrification, RICHMOND CONFIDENTIAL (Sept. 29, 2016), http://richmondconfidential.org/2016/09/29/richmond-residents-fighting-eviction-gentrification/. 115 California Housing Partnership, supra note 107. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 82 of ? 2016 database, a person remained on the waiting list for vouchers for the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa (HACCC) for an average of 47 months.116 Finally, diminished affordable housing is a strong contributing factor to perpetuating disability and access problems. In 2016, the average annual income of an individual receiving supplemental security income (SSI) was $9,156, which is just 20 percent of the national median income of a one-person household and 22 percent below the federal poverty level.117 In California, the statewide average one-bedroom rent is 138 percent of the state’s monthly SSI payment.118 In 2017, 25,747 individuals in Contra Costa received SSI payments.119 Occupancy codes and restrictions Although some occupancy codes and restrictions within Contra Costa County may be more restrictive than is justified by health and safety concerns, this Assessment did not reveal a spatial pattern whereby families with children or Black and Hispanic families have been concentrated in certain parts of the County, the Region, or the entitlement cities, thus perpetuating segregation. California has adopted the Uniform Housing Code, and the only occupancy standards therein are designed for safety and to ensure there is no overcrowding. The Richmond, Pittsburg, and Contra Costa County Public Housing Authorities implement certain occupancy standards for their Section 8 and Public Housing programs in accordance with Fair Housing Act standards. Housing Authority of Contra Costa County HACCC will assign one bedroom for each two persons within the household, except in the following circumstances:  Live-in aides will be allocated a separate sleeping area. No additional bedrooms will be provided for the live-in aide’s family.  Single person families will be allocated a zero or one bedroom  Adults of different generations, persons of the opposite sex (other than spouses), and unrelated adults will not be required to share a bedroom. Exceptions to this standard closely track the exceptions detailed above for the Richmond Housing Authority and Pittsburg Housing Authority. Given that this standard is more 116 Waiting Lists, Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa, https://affordablehousingonline.com/housing-authority/California/Housing-Authority-of-the-County-of- Contra-Costa/CA011. 117 Priced Out: Fact Sheet, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COLLABORATIVE (Dec. 12, 2017) http://www.tacinc.org/media/59489/priced-out-fact-sheet.pdf. 118 Id. 119 Table 3. Number of recipients in state (by eligibility category, age, and receipt of OASDI benefits) and amount of payments, by county, December 2017, Social Security Administration, https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/ssi_sc/2017/ca.pdf. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 83 of ? restrictive than the other housing authorities, though still consistent with the Keating Memorandum conveying HUD’s guidance on reasonable occupancy standards, an exception allowing more occupants per bedroom if the total size of the unit is above a certain square footage may be advisable. Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburg HACP does not determine who shares a bedroom, but there must be at least one person per bedroom on the Voucher, regardless of sex/age/ relationship/health/personal preference. Family Unit standard: two persons per bedroom, but head of household and spouse are not required to share a bedroom with their children. Exceptions to this standard closely track the exceptions detailed above for the Richmond Housing Authority. Richmond Housing Authority  1 bedroom for the head of household (and spouse if any) plus  1 bedroom for the next one or two persons in the household regardless of age/sex  24-hour live-in aides (including a family member) may be allocated a separate bedroom, and/or may use the living room as a bedroom Exceptions may be justified based on relationship, age, sex, health or disability of family members, or other personal circumstances (like the need for an additional bedroom for medical equipment, or the need for a separate bedroom for reasons related to disability/medical/health condition). No exceptions (regarding number of bedrooms) may be made for sole-occupants who are not elderly/disabled. Private discrimination Private discrimination continues to be a problem in Contra Costa County, perpetuating segregation. In 2016, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing reported that it received 32 housing complaints from residents of Contra Costa County.120 In 2011, Fair Housing of Marin (now known as Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California) under contract with Bay Area Legal Aid conducted fair housing testing via phone to investigate housing discrimination in Richmond. In the testing, white testers and Black testers called 20 housing providers who had posted rental advertisements on Craigslist. Ultimately, the test showed there was significant differential treatment in favor of white testers over Black 120 2016 Annual Report, Department of Fair Employment and Housing, http://www.dfeh.ca.gov/wp- content/uploads/sites/32/2016/09/Department-of-Fair-Employment-and-Housing-2016-Annual-Report.pdf. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 84 of ? testers in 55 percent of calls.121 Because whites receive better services, they tend to live in neighborhoods apart from minority groups. Source of income discrimination Source of income discrimination is a contributing factor to segregation. Many Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) holders in the Bay Area face considerable difficulty in finding a landlord willing to accept a voucher.122 For example, residents of a Richmond Housing Authority project undergoing renovation were given Housing Choice Vouchers as part of a relocation process but reported being unable to find housing due in part to source of income discrimination.123 When tenants are able to find rentals that will accept vouchers, they may face long waiting lists.124 In areas that do offer more affordable housing, some voucher holders have been met with resistance by some longtime community members.125 In 2011, the City of Antioch settled a class-action lawsuit filed by Black Housing Choice Voucher holders who alleged that the city and its police department engaged in a targeted campaign of discrimination against voucher holders.126 Although the California Fair Employment and Housing Act bars discrimination on the basis of source of income, Housing Choice Vouchers are not considered a protected source of income.127 Legislation which would have barred source of income discrimination against renters who rely on Housing Choice Vouchers statewide failed in the State Senate in 2016.128 There is currently no county-wide ordinance banning source of income discrimination nor is there such an ordinance in any municipality in Contra Costa County. In the Bay Area, jurisdictions with ordinances banning source of income discrimination against Housing Choice Voucher holders include San Francisco, East 121 Derek Lartaud, Test Suggests Discrimination Against African Americans in Search of Rental Housing , RICHMOND CONFIDENTIAL (Oct. 27, 2011), http://richmondconfidential.org/2011/10/27/test-suggests-discrimination- against-african-americans-in-search-of-rental-housing/. 122 Tammerlin Drummond, Red Hot Bay Area Housing Puts Big Chill on Section 8, The Mercury News (June 17, 2016), http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/06/17/red-hot-bay-area-housing-puts-big-chill-on-section-8/. 123 Karina Ioffee, Richmond: City Struggles to Find Homes for Troubled Public Housing Project’s Residents , THE MERCURY NEWS (Apr. 24, 2015), http://www.mercurynews.com/2015/04/24/richmond-city-struggles-to-find- homes-for-troubled-public-housing-projects-residents/. 124 Matthias Gafni, Walnut Creek: Section 8 Tenants in Apartment Complex Squeezed Out, THE MERCURY NEWS (Mar. 27, 2015), http://www.mercurynews.com/2015/03/27/walnut-creek-section-8-tenants-in-apartment- complex-squeezed-ou. 125 Solomon Moore, As Program Moves Poor to Suburbs, Tensions Follow, NEW YORK TIMES (Aug. 8, 2008), http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/09/us/09housing.html. 126 Williams v. City of Antioch, PUBLIC ADVOCATES, http://www.publicadvocates.org/our-work/housing- justice/williams-v-city-antioch/. 127 Sabi v. Sterling, 183 Cal. App. 4th 916 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010). 128 Eric Kurhi, Santa Clara County Mandates Landlords Take Section 8 , THE MERCURY NEWS (Feb. 7, 2017), http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/02/07/santa-clara-county-considers-making-landlords-take-section-8/. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 85 of ? Palo Alto, and Santa Clara County.129 The San Diego City Council is currently considering such an ordinance.130 Passing such an ordinance in Contra Costa may help reduce source of income discrimination in the County. Other ordinances, such as a reusable screening report ordinance and a “first-in-time” ordinance, would strengthen a source of income ordinance.131 The reusable screening report ordinance would ensure Housing Choice Voucher holders do not have to pay excessive fees to multiple landlords, while the “first-in-time” ordinance would require landlords to offer tenancy to the first qualified applicants who complete an application. 4.3 Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs) R/ECAPs are geographic areas with significant concentrations of poverty and minority populations.132 HUD has developed a census-tract based definition of R/ECAPs. In terms of racial or ethnic concentration, R/ECAPs are areas with a non-White population of 50 percent or more. With regards to poverty, R/ECAPs are census tracts in which 40 percent or more of individuals are living at or below the poverty limit or that have a poverty rate three times the average poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower.133 For example, the federal poverty line for a family of four is $25,100.134 If the average percentage of people living in poverty the metropolitan were eight percent, and a particular census tract had 24 percent of people living in poverty (plus the necessary demographics), that census tract would be considered a R/ECAP. Similarly, any census tract with 40 percent or more people living in poverty would be a R/ECAP with the necessary demographics (majority of the census tract is non-White). Additionally, due to the substantial cost of living in California, the federal poverty line definitions are often inadequate.135 Where one lives has a substantial effect on mental and physical health, education, crime levels, and economic opportunity. Urban areas that are more residentially segregated by race 129 Id. 130 Ken Stone, No Bias Against Section 8 Renters, Says Plan Going to San Diego Council , TIMES OF SAN DIEGO (June 27, 2018), https://timesofsandiego.com/politics/2018/06/27/no-bias-against-section-8-renters-says-plan- going-to-san-diego-council/. 131 Preventing Source of Income Discrimination, HAAS INSTITUTE, https://haasinstitute.berkeley.edu/belongingrichmond-sourceofincomediscrimination. 132 Office of the Secretary, HUD, Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing, Sections 5.160 through 5.180 appear at 80 FR 42363, July 2015, https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2016-title24-vol1/pdf/CFR-2016-title24-vol1-sec5- 152.pdf. 133 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, HUD Open Data for R/ECAP Tract Current and Historic, https://egis-hud.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/320b8ab5d0304daaa7f1b8c03ff01256_0 . 134U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Poverty Guidelines, https://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty -guidelines. 135 Public Policy Institute of California, Poverty in California, http://www.ppic.org/publication/poverty-in- california/. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 86 of ? and income tend to have lower levels of upward economic mobility than other areas.136 Research has found that racial inequality is thus amplified by residential segregation.137 Concentrated poverty is also associated with higher crime rates and worse health outcomes.138 However, these areas may also offer some opportunities as well. Individuals may actively choose to settle in neighborhoods containing R/ECAPs due to proximity to job centers.139 Ethnic enclaves in particular may help immigrants build a sense of community and adapt to life in the U.S. The businesses, social networks, and institutions in ethnic enclaves may help immigrants preserve their cultural identities while providing a variety of services that allow them to establish themselves in their new homes.140 Overall, identifying R/ECAPs facilitates understanding of entrenched patterns of segregation and poverty. Identification of R/ECAPs There is only one area within Contra Costa County that meets the official criteria for R/ECAPs. It is located in the Monument Corridor area of Concord. However, the current R/ECAP criteria are not well-suited to this area because they utilize a nationwide poverty rate. Due to the high cost of living in the San Francisco Bay area, utilization of a nationwide poverty rate severely underestimates whether an individual is living in poverty. To combat this problem, this report expands the definition of R/ECAPs to include majority-minority census tracts that have poverty rates of 25 percent or more. This report identifies twelve census tracts that qualify as R/ECAPs. Under the expanded definition, the twelve identified R/ECAPS are located in the areas of Antioch, Bay Point, Concord, Pittsburg, North Richmond, Richmond and San Pablo. The Cities of Richmond and Concord have the largest concentrations of census tracts living in poverty, with three each. As of the 2012-2016 American Community Survey, 69,326 people lived in these R/ECAPs. This figure represented 6.3 percent of the County’s population as of that date. Please see Map 1 in appendix. 136 National Bureau of Economic Research, Where is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States, January 2014, http://www.nber.org/papers/w19843.pdf. 137 Raj Chetty & Nathaniel Hendren, The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility: Chil dhood Exposure Effects and County-Level Estimates, HARVARD UNIVERSITY AND NBER (May 2015), http://www.equality-of- opportunity.org/images/nbhds_paper.pdf; Raj Chetty & Nathaniel Hendren, The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility II: County-Level Estimates, STANFORD UNIVERSITY, HARVARD UNIVERSITY, AND NBER (Dec. 2017), http://www.equality-of-opportunity.org/assets/documents/movers_paper2.pdf. 138 Brookings Institute, The Re-Emergence of Concentrated Poverty: Metropolitan Trends in the 2000s, November 2011, https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-re-emergence-of-concentrated-poverty-metropolitan-trends- in-the-2000s/. 139 Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration, Root Races: Latino Engagement, Place Identities, and Shared Futures in South Los Angeles, October 2016, https://dornsife.usc.edu/assets/sites/731/docs/RootsRaices_Full_Report_CSII_USC_Final2016_Web_Small.pdf. 140 Journal of Environmental Psychology, Creating a Sense of Place: The Vietnamese-American and Little Saigon, 2000, http://users.clas.ufl.edu/msscha/landarch/readings/res_report_qual_creating_sense_place.pdf. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 87 of ? Contra Costa County In Bay Point, there is one R/ECAP. It is located north of Willow Pass Road, and goes all the way to the water. It is roughly bounded to the east by Loftus Road and the west by Port Chicago Highway. In North Richmond, there is one R/ECAP. Its eastern boundary is formed by Giant Road. It lies between W. Gertrude Avenue to the south and Parr Boulevard to the north. The census tract extends all the way to the water on the west side. In Richmond, there are three R/ECAPs, all roughly located within the Iron Triangle area. Two of the R/ECAPs are stacked on top of each other, and form a triangle shape. The southern border aligns with Ohio Avenue, and sides of the triangle are bounded by Richmond Parkway to the west, and the railroad tracks along Carlson Boulevard to the east. The third R/ECAP is directly to the east of the other two. It extends roughly to Highway 80 on its eastern side, and the southern border is formed by Cutting Boulevard. The western boundary is shared with the other two R/ECAPs, and is formed by the railroad tracks along Carlson Boulevard. The northern boundary roughly aligns with Macdonald Avenue. In San Pablo, there is one R/ECAP. It is bounded by Highway 80 to the east, and El Portal Road to the north. The western boundary is formed by San Pablo Avenue and 23rd Street. The southern boundary roughly traces the San Pablo city boundary. Antioch In Antioch, there is one relatively small R/ECAP. It is located in the area between Highway 4 (on the southern end) and railroad tracks (on the northern end). Somerville Road and L Street form the eastern and western boundaries. Concord In Concord, there are three R/ECAPS which share borders with each other. They are all located in the Monument Corridor area of Concord, and include the one official R/ECAP identified through the HUD AFFH Data and Mapping Tool. The R/ECAPs are roughly bounded by Highway 242 to the west, and Monument Boulevard to the east. Pittsburg In Pittsburg, there are two R/ECAPS which border each other. The northern R/ECAP is bounded by E. 14th Street to the north and Highway 4 to the south. The other R/ECAP, immediately to the south of the first, is similarly bounded by Highway 4 to the north and Buchanan Road to the south. It is bounded by Railroad Avenue to the west. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 88 of ? Predominant Protected Classes Residing in R/ECAPs Hispanics make up a disproportionately large percentage of residents who reside in R/ECAPs compared to the population of the County and the Region as a whole, and even when compared to the R/ECAPs in the region. Hispanic residents comprise approximately 53 percent of all individuals living in R/ECAPs in the County and 29 percent of individuals in R/ECAPs regionally, while making up approximately 25 percent of the County’s population and 22 percent of the regional population. Black residents also constitute a disproportionate percentage of R/ECAP residents in the County and the region. Black residents are approximately nine percent of the County’s population and seven percent of the regional population, but make up nearly 18 percent of residents within R/ECAPs in the County and 23 percent of R/ECAPs in the Region. The share of Asian Americans in County R/ECAPs is smaller than the overall proportion of Asian Americans in the County and the Region, but the share of Asian Americans in the Region’s R/ECAPs is roughly equivalent to the Region’s overall proportion of Asian Americans. The share of non-Hispanic Whites in R/ECAPS in the County and the Region is smaller than the overall proportion of non-Hispanic Whites in the County and the Region. People of Mexican, Salvadoran, and Guatemalan national origin disproportionately reside in Contra Costa’s R/ECAPs. Mexican Americans make up 6.4 percent of the County’s overall population, but account for 19.57 percent of the population in R/ECAPS. Salvadoran Americans make up 1.3 percent of the County’s overall population, but account for 4.65 percent of the population in R/ECAPs. Guatemalan Americans make up 0.4 percent of the County’s overall population, but account for 1.49 percent of the population in R/ECAPs. In the Region overall, Mexican American and Chinese American individuals disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs. The proportion of families with children under 18 still in the household is notably higher in both the Contra Costa County R/ECAPs and the Regional R/ECAPs than in the general population in either the County or the Region. In the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward metropolitan area, it is 43 percent, compared to 45 percent in Contra Costa County. Meanwhile, the statistic rises to 49.11 percent and 59.93 percent in their respective R/ECAPs, though much more notably in the County than the region. This data is important because the higher rate of dependent children living in R/ECAPs translates to an even greater strain on the resources of the people living there who, statistically, are already living in poverty. Change in R/ECAPs Over Time (since 1990) In the maps (see appendix), the official R/ECAPs are highlighted in pink. Over time, the number of official R/ECAPs within the County has declined. However, as previously discussed, due to the high cost of living in the San Francisco Bay area, the usual criteria for R/ECAPs severely underestimate the concentration of individuals living in poverty. One of the best uses for the R/ECAP maps is to show the relative continuity of the newly-identified 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 89 of ? R/ECAPs per this analysis’s own criteria. What follows is a discussion in the change of R/ECAP locations over time. The officially identified R/ECAPs are all clustered on the west side of the County, in the Richmond/North Richmond area. When the definition is expanded, R/ECAPs appear to cluster in a grouping around the northern waterfront and down through the center of the County between the large regional parks on either side (e.g. Antioch, Pittsburg, and Concord). The official R/ECAPs which align with the expanded definition are located in Richmond and North Richmond. In 1990, there were four R/ECAPs, three of which align with the current definition. The southernmost R/ECAP is not currently represented, although it is still part of the Iron Triangle area of Richmond. By 2000, the number of official R/ECAPs had shrunk, and there was some slight shifting of the location of the R/ECAPs, although they all stayed in the Iron Triangle area of Richmond and North Richmond. The southernmost tract disappeared off the map, but the adjacent tract took its place. This tract has not been identified as a R/ECAP using the new criteria, although it is adjacent to tracts which do qualify. In 2010, the number of official R/ECAPs reduced to two, and once again, the R/ECAPs shifted to adjacent census tracts. Of the two 2010 R/ECAP census tracts, only one qualifies under our new criteria. However, once again, the other tract is adjacent to a tract that qualifies as a R/ECAP under the expanded definition. As before, the tracts are all located within the Iron Triangle area of Richmond. Since the number of R/ECAP census tracts diminished over the past three censuses, does this suggest that poverty in the area is getting marginally better? Perhaps, but it is difficult to draw such comparisons when using the expanded definition, which the map does not display. It is also difficult to draw that comparison because of the shifting of the official R/ECAPs back and forth between the adjacent tracts within the Iron Triangle. If anything, this suggests that each of these areas continued to be poor, but not all of them registered under the nationwide R/ECAP criteria. Additional R/ECAP Information [Additional information may be provided through public input in final draft.] R/ECAP Place-based Investments & Mobility Options Place-Based Investments Place-based investments concentrate development funds in specific areas with the aim of improving and revitalizing places that may have fallen into disrepair or which may be strategically located but in need of support in order to develop fully. From 1945 until 2012, 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 90 of ? California operated local redevelopment agencies (RDAs), designed to revitalize blighted neighborhoods and, importantly, devote 20 percent of allocated funds to affordable housing.141 In response to budget concerns, the RDAs were disbanded in 2012, and successor agencies were designated to wind down the RDA activities.142 Whereas under the RDA system specific revenue was devoted to place-based investments, now the successor agencies are mostly focused on selling off remaining properties to private third parties. Nevertheless, some of these private parties propose useful place-based investments, like affordable housing and businesses aimed at revitalizing the area. Place-based investments specific to historic and current R/ECAP communities are detailed below, although there were additional RDA projects in Rodeo, Montalvin Manor, and Contra Costa Centre which are not discussed here. Contra Costa County There are projects in Rodeo and at the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART station which were assumed by the Contra Costa County successor agency and are actively seeking development partners to complete the planned development.143 The County has also undertaken a Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative, in cooperation with its partners, the cities of Antioch, Concord, Hercules, Martinez, Oakley, and Pittsburg.144 The project is expected to advance the manufacturing subsectors of clean tech, food processing, diverse manufacturing, bio-tech/bio-medical, and advanced transportation fuels, and create 18,000 new jobs by 2035.145 Bay Point -After the dissolution of the California RDAs, a plan to construct transit-adjacent housing and retail space near the Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Station, known as Orbisonia Heights, stalled indefinitely.146 The demolished plot of land attracted squatters and transients.147 Several years passed, but as of March 2017, the Contra Costa County Housing Successor to the Redevelopment Agency has selected a developer to rekindle the Orbisonia Heights project.148 North Richmond -A 42-unit affordable housing complex with project-based Section 8 vouchers and Rental Assistance Demonstration vouchers is under construction in North 141 Casey Blount et al, Redevelopment Agencies in California: History, Benefits, Excesses, and Closure , ECONOMIC MARKET ANALYSIS WORKING PAPER SERIES (Jan. 2014), https://www.huduser.gov/portal/publications/redevelopment_whitepaper.pdf. 142 Id. 143 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES, http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/6413/Development- Opportunities. 144 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: NORTHERN WATERFRONT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE, http://www.co.contra- costa.ca.us/4437/Northern-Waterfront-Economic-Development 145 Id. 146 Sean Maher, Project to Revitalize Bay Point Stalled Indefinitely Without Redevelopment, THE MERCURY NEWS (Jan. 22, 2012), https://www.mercurynews.com/2012/01/22/project-to-revitalize-bay-point-stalled- indefinitely-without-redevelopment/. 147 Id. 148 Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals: Orbisonia Heights Site, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/44957. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 91 of ? Richmond, and proponents hope that it will revitalize the community center.149 The Heritage Point Development is being built across the street from an existing senior apartment complex, and near the Contra Costa Health Services’ North Richmond Center for Health.150 Hopefully, construction will attract new residents, businesses and, importantly, a grocery store – as the area is a food desert.151 Antioch As factories started closing in the 1960s, people started moving away from the industrial town of Antioch, and the downtown area suffered with the loss of retailers following residents.152 Past revitalization efforts have been largely considered failures; the constant recipe suggested over the years has been the addition of high-density housing downtown, which would provide nearby customers for shops and restaurants.153 Other proposed strategies include a downtown park which could host festivals and farmers’ markets, or closing off some streets to create a pedestrian mall.154 The four east County cities (Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley, and Pittsburg) have also launched a website to connect businesses and development opportunities in the region.155 The website promotes available sites, demographics, and business reports, and allows side-by-side comparison of communities to highlight the advantages of locating a business there.156 Concord Concord has recently seen an influx in restaurants and businesses, drawing developers to put in high density housing downtown and near public transit.157 The City Council, acting as the successor agency, is authorized to sell the properties, keep them for future development, or 149 Sam Richards, ‘Catalyst’ North Richmond Apartment Project Moves Forward, EAST BAY TIMES (Dec. 16, 2017), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/12/16/catalyst-north-richmond-apartment-project-moves-forward/. 150 Id. 151 Id. See also USDA Food Desert Map, https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-access-research-atlas/go- to-the-atlas/. 152 Bay Area News Group, Downtown Dreams: Antioch Looks Again To Revitalize Historic Rivertown , EAST BAY TIMES (Mar. 14, 2014), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2014/03/14/downtown-dreams-antioch-looks-again- to-revitalize-historic-rivertown/. 153 Id. 154 Id. 155 EAST COUNTY 4 YOUR BUSINESS, http://www.eastcounty4you.com/. 156 Antioch Economic Development Updates, ANTIOCH ON THE MOVE, https://antiochonthemove.com/antioch- economic-development-updates/. 157 Roland Li, Developers to Break Ground on 180 Apartments Next to East Bay BART Station , SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES (Aug. 25, 2016), https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/real-estate/2016/08/concord- housing-development-legacy-syres.html. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 92 of ? retain them for government use.158 Three former RDA properties have been sold to mixed- use high density housing and retail developers, and three other high density housing projects have been initiated independent of the former RDA program.159 There is one other proposed multifamily high density housing project in the works.160 Most of these projects are located in the Monument Corridor area, or just to the north, in downtown Concord; this aligns well with the R/ECAPs in the Monument Corridor area of Concord (using the expanded definition based on the high cost of living in the Bay Area). Three other RDA properties have been ceded to companies to be developed into non-housing investments like parking lots and car dealership expansions.161 Pittsburg Pittsburg’s general approach has been to sell off its portfolio of properties left over from the RDA.162 However, in early 2018, city staff suggested that two of the lots would be better suited to aiding BART and city transit goals.163 This suggestion comes after the Oversight Board voted to sell the properties to a Concord-based development company.164 Staff prepared a report to recommend that the properties be used to address worsening traffic conditions, pedestrian safety concerns, and possible BART station parking.165 The City Council voted on the matter pursuant to the staff report, and resolved that the land was needed for a public purpose and would be retained by the City to be used to alleviate traffic and other concerns, as proposed by the staff.166 Richmond The Richmond RDA was heavily involved in non-housing investment projects such as the BART redesign, sidewalk replacement, and the Nevin Park renewal, but many of these plans 158 Lisa P. White, Former Concord Redevelopment Agency Properties Eyes for Housing, EAST BAY TIMES (Aug. 29, 2017), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/08/29/former-concord-redevelopment-agency-properties-eyed- for-housing/. 159 Roland Li, Developers to Break Ground on 180 Apartments Next to East Bay BART Station , SAN FRANCISCO BUSINESS TIMES (Aug. 25, 2016), https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/real-estate/2016/08/concord- housing-development-legacy-syres.html; Lisa P. White, Former Concord Redevelopment Agency Properties Eyed for Housing, EAST BAY TIMES (Aug. 29, 2017), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/08/29/former-concord- redevelopment-agency-properties-eyed-for-housing/. 160 Id. 161 Id. 162 Aaron Davis, Pittsburg Suggests Public Uses for Lot Slated to Be Sold to Seeno, EAST BAY TIMES (Jan. 11, 2018), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2018/01/11/pittsburg-suggests-public-uses-for-lot-slated-to-be-sold-to- seeno/. 163 Id. 164 Id. 165 Id. 166 See City of Pittsburg Agenda (Jan. 16, 2018), http://apps.ci.pittsburg.ca.us/sirepub/mtgviewer.aspx?meetid=732&doctype=AGENDA. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 93 of ? were derailed during the recession.167 After the dissolution of the California RDAs, nonprofits like the Richmond Main Street Initiative stepped in, organizing music events and farmers’ markets, and giving guidance to small business owners.168 The Richmond RDA had several pending housing projects: Metro Walk, Easter Hill, Trinity Plaza/Macdonald Senior Housing, Nevin Court, Filbert Townhomes, and Carquinez Apartments.169 Most of these affordable housing projects seem to have been completed under the supervision of the successor agency, with the notable exception of Filbert Townhomes. Nearly all of these projects were located in or near the Iron Triangle area of Richmond, aligning with both current and former R/ECAP locations. Mobility Options As is discussed in greater detail in the Publicly Supported Housing Analysis, the Housing Authority of Contra Costa County utilizes a two-tiered rent system for the Housing Choice Voucher Program. This system expands the options available to voucher holders residing in R/ECAPs, but more intensive policy interventions could be more effective. Contributing Factors of R/ECAPs Community opposition The nature and extent of community opposition to affordable and multi-family housing is discussed in greater detail in the Segregation section. Community opposition is a significant contributing factor to R/ECAPs in the Region, Contra Costa County, the City of Antioch, the City of Concord, the City of Pittsburg, and the service area of the Richmond Housing Authority. By reducing the living options available to current R/ECAP residents outside of R/ECAPs, community opposition reinforces the racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic demographics of R/ECAPs. Deteriorated and abandoned properties Deteriorated and abandoned properties are a significant contributing factor to R/ECAPs in Contra Costa County and in the service area of the Richmond Housing Authority, in particular. Most of the available data and news coverage pertains to the Richmond area, and so that is the focus of the following discussion. Contra Costa County and the City of Richmond were hit hard by the housing crisis and are just beginning to recover. As a result of the housing crisis, there is an epidemic of empty homes and abandoned properties. So-called “zombie foreclosures” are a particular problem – homes that have been abandoned by the owners in 167 Elly Schmidt-Hopper, Long Neglected, Richmond’s Downtown Is Being Slowly Reborn, RICHMOND CONFIDENTIAL (Dec. 21, 2014), http://richmondconfidential.org/2014/12/21/long-neglected-richmonds-downtown-is-being- slowly-reborn/. 168 Id. 169 What Redevelopment Means to Richmond, RICHMOND COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/6846. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 94 of ? anticipation of foreclosure, but that have not actually been foreclosed upon by the banks.170 Data on these issues come from various sources and do not always match up year to year, but the year of each data set is noted below. An estimated 13 percent of foreclosed homes in Contra Costa are zombie foreclosures.171 There are a variety of reasons why the bank might not foreclose. Since 2007, the average time period for foreclosure has more than doubled. Additionally, foreclosure fees may be more than the property is actually worth. Quite simply, an avoidance of this formal step allows banks to avoid liability. Bank officials claim that zombie foreclosures are a result of regulations, not profit-motivated. They further insist that when foreclosure is postponed, the owner is notified. But local community members beg to differ. Troublingly, such lack of notice forestalls owners’ futures. Zombie foreclosures are only part of the picture. In Richmond alone, 432 homes are in foreclosure,172 with an estimated 800 total abandoned properties.173 These 800 properties cost the city $1.7 million ($7,000/house) to keep them shuttered, keep squatters out, and mow the grass.174A large proportion of these properties are in Richmond’s Iron Triangle – a predominantly Black and Hispanic neighborhood that fell into disrepair during the housing crisis and has developed a reputation as a poor, high crime area. Twice a week, Richmond Code Enforcement employees visit individual properties to check for signs of blight which might attract squatters or illicit activities, and fix the problems. The abandoned homes are fire hazards and sites for illegal activity, including trash dumping. The abandoned properties are a problem for the County for reasons similar to the banks: there is little chance such properties will sell at auction because they owe more in outstanding taxes than they are worth.175 Local governments have tried a variety of strategies over the years, to varying degrees of success. Richmond made national headlines with its short-lived, creative strategy of using eminent domain to block home foreclosures, but that effort did not ultimately succeed.176 Instead, Richmond became the first California municipality in 30 years to regulate rents and 170 Joaquin Palomino, Zombie Foreclosures: Richmond’s Hidden Housing Crisis, Richmond Confidential (Oct. 9, 2013), http://richmondconfidential.org/2013/10/09/zombie-foreclosures-richmonds-hidden-housing-crisis/. 171 As of 2013, there were 1178 zombie foreclosures in Contra Costa County alone, with 2,000 zombie foreclosures in the entire East Bay. David Mills, Is There A “Zombie House” In Concord Near You?, PATCH (Apr. 2, 2013 ), https://patch.com/california/concord-ca/is-there-a-zombie-house-in-concord-near-you. 172 Joaquin Palomino, Zombie Foreclosures: Richmond’s Hidden Housing Crisis, Richmond Confidential (Oct. 9, 2013), http://richmondconfidential.org/2013/10/09/zombie-foreclosures-richmonds-hidden-housing-crisis/. (as of 2013). 173 Karina Ioffee, Richmond: Slow Going for Anti-Blight Effort, EAST BAY TIMES (July 14, 2016), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2016/07/14/richmond-slow-going-for-anti-blight-effort/ (as of 2016). 174 Karina Ioffee, Richmond Looks to Social Impact Bonds to Clean Up Blight , THE MERCURY NEWS (May 29, 2015), https://www.mercurynews.com/2015/05/29/richmond-looks-to-social-impact-bonds-to-clean-up-blight-2/. 175 Alex Nieves, Vacant, Neglected, Destructive: How Richmond’s Abandoned Homes Became Fire Hazards, RICHMOND CONFIDENTIAL (Jan. 15, 2018), http://richmondconfidential.org/2018/01/15/vacant-neglected- destructive-how-richmonds-abandoned-homes-became-fire-hazards/. 176 Steve Early, Richmond, California, Teaches US a Lesson About Progressive Organizing, TRUTH OUT (Feb. 9, 2017), http://www.truth-out.org/opinion/item/39416-richmond-california-teaches-us-a-lesson-about- progressive-organizing. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 95 of ? evictions for properties built before 1995.177 In 2008, Richmond passed an ordinance allowing the city to collect $1,000 fines/day from banks that do not maintain their foreclosed properties after 30 days of notice.178 The program had great success, with $1 million in fees collected in 2011-2012, making up over 20 percent of the Code Enforcement budget. However, with the recent increase in zombie foreclosures (wherein banks delay actually foreclosing), these fines have plummeted; the ordinance also expired in 2013. Richmond has also launched an ambitious program to use social impact bonds to rehab abandoned properties. The California Community Reinvestment Act requires institutional investors to invest in community programs, so the city has been able to transfer the risk associated with this rehab program to powerful banks better equipped to handle a potential loss.179 The Richmond Community Foundation manages the project, and is hoping to acquire and rehab 80-100 properties in the next five years.180 Finished homes will first be made available to graduates of a financial literacy program, to prevent bidding wars and help first- time homeowners take advantage of the program. Despite the program’s ambition, RCF has not made much progress yet. One year after the introduction of the social impact bonds, RCF had rehabbed only one property, with another one underway. The program encountered significant obstacles in trying to free up the titles of liens and unpaid taxes. California law requires that a home be tax delinquent for five years before auction, or three years if it has a nuisance abatement lien. RCF has communicated with the Contra Costa County tax collector’s office about expediting the process, but the office is constrained by state law. Displacement of residents due to economic pressures Displacement of residents due to economic pressures is discussed in greater detail in the Segregation section. Displacement due to economic pressures is a major contributing factor to R/ECAPs, as the most vulnerable residents living near the poverty line who are displaced from their original homes often end up in R/ECAPs, concentrated with other people displaced by poverty. Lack of community revitalization strategies The scope and adequacy of community revitalization strategies is discussed in greater detail in the Segregation section. The lack of community revitalization strategies and, in particular, the lack of funding for the full implementation of community revitalization strategies is a significant contributing factor to R/ECAPs, particularly in the Cities of Antioch and Pittsburg 177 See Karina Ioffee, Richmond Rent Control: Tenants Love It, Landlords Grudgingly Go Along with It , EAST BAY TIMES (Mar. 29, 2017), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/03/29/richmond-rent-control-tenants-love-it- landlords-grudgingly-go-along-with-it/. 178 Joaquin Palomino, Zombie Foreclosures: Richmond’s Hidden Housing Crisis, RICHMOND CONFIDENTIAL (Oct. 9, 2013), http://richmondconfidential.org/2013/10/09/zombie-foreclosures-richmonds-hidden-housing-crisis/. 179 Karina Ioffee, Richmond Looks to Social Impact Bonds to Clean Up Blight , THE MERCURY NEWS (May 29, 2015), https://www.mercurynews.com/2015/05/29/richmond-looks-to-social-impact-bonds-to-clean-up-blight-2/. 180 Karina Ioffee, Richmond: Slow Going for Anti-Blight Effort, EAST BAY TIMES (July 14, 2016), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2016/07/14/richmond-slow-going-for-anti-blight-effort/. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 96 of ? and nearby portions of the County such as Bay Point. Community revitalization efforts that bring decent jobs that are accessible to local residents could reduce poverty rates in the area to levels below the expanded R/ECAP threshold. Lack of local or regional cooperation The Segregation section contains a more detailed discussion of the lack of local or regional cooperation. Lack of local or regional cooperation is a contributing factor to R/ECAPs in the Region, Contra Costa County, the City of Antioch, the City of Concord, the City of Pittsburg, and the service area of the Richmond Housing Authority. In the Bay Area, many cities have not met their goals under the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) process. The RHNA process is mandated by state housing law to determine how much each local government in a region will accommodate its portion of the region’s housing need. Local governments must zone land to meet its portion of the housing need and identify sites for housing development. Generally, Bay Area governments do not permit enough housing to meet their RHNA targets for low-income housing. For the period of 2007-2014, Contra Costa County issued permits for less than 25 percent of its allocated need for very low and low-income RHNA units.181 Across the Bay Area, more than two thirds of the housing needed for very low, low, and moderate households was not permitted between 2007 and 2014.182 There are significant disparities in how jurisdictions have permitted to meet their RHNA goals. Cities that do not permit their “fair share” of housing may place greater housing pressure on other jurisdictions that are more likely to permit housing. It is also important to note that a lack of permitting may reflect market forces as developers may lack an incentive to apply for permits to build affordable housing. A lack of regional cooperation may help artificially constrain regional housing supply and contribute to R/ECAPs as low-income people of color may have few affordable housing options outside of R/ECAPs. The race to the bottom in providing business development incentives, which can be a result of a lack of coordination and has the potential to perpetuate R/ECAPs, does not appear to be a significant issue in Contra Costa County. Affluent cities like Walnut Creek, Danville, and San Ramon do not appear to offer tax incentives that divert job creation away from R/ECAPs. Lack of private investments in specific neighborhoods Lack of private investments in specific neighborhoods is discussed in greater detail in the Segregation section. Lack of private investments is a significant contributing factor to 181 Report 1614, Where Will We Live? The Affordable Housing Waiting List Is Closed, THE 2015-2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY GRAND JURY (June 14, 2016), http://www.cc- courts.org/civil/docs/grandjury/1614%20Affordable%20Housing%20Final%2006_14_16.pdf. 182 Heather Bromfield & Eli Moor, Unfair Shares: Racial Disparities and the Regional Housing Needs Allocation Process in the Bay Area, HAAS INSTITUTE (Aug. 2017), http://haasinstitute.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/haasinstitute_unfairshares_rhnabayarea_publish.pdf . 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 97 of ? R/ECAPs as the lack of decent, accessible jobs is a major driver of poverty in Contra Costa County’s R/ECAPs, particularly in east County. Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including, services or amenities Lack of public investments in specific neighborhoods, including, services or amenities is discussed in greater detail in the Segregation section. Lack of public investments is a significant contributing factor to R/ECAPs both because road and sidewalk conditions deter the creation of decent jobs in R/ECAPs throughout the County and because the lack of public funding for social service provision in east County communities experiencing increasing poverty undermines broader anti-poverty initiatives. Land use and zoning laws Land use and zoning laws are discussed in greater detail in the Segregation section. Land use and zoning laws are a significant contributing factor to R/ECAPs because restrictive zoning in affluent, predominantly White parts of the County reduces living options for R/ECAP residents. By contrast, this Assessment did not reveal evidence that zoning restrictions limiting mixed-use or commercial development within R/ECAPs have decreased access to employment. Location and type of affordable housing Location and type of affordable housing is discussed in more detail in the Segregation section. Location and type of affordable housing is not a major contributing factor to R/ECAPs. Loss of Affordable Housing Loss of affordable housing is discussed in greater detail in the Segregation section. Loss of affordable housing greatly contributes to segregation and the creation of R/ECAPS. In California, state law mandates that jurisdictions evaluate affordable housing stock that is at- risk of conversion to market-rate housing as part of the Housing Element of a comprehensive General Plan. Housing elements conducted by incorporated cities in Contra Costa as well as by the County government indicate that thousands of affordable units in the County are at- risk of conversion to market-rate housing.183 If low-income and minority families are priced out of their current homes, they will be forced to relocate to R/ECAPS or even out of the County all-together, further perpetuating segregation in Contra Costa. Occupancy codes and restrictions Occupancy codes and restrictions are discussed in greater detail in the Segregation section. Occupancy codes and restrictions do not appear to be a significant contributing factor to 183 City of Richmond Housing Element (May 19, 2015), http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/31210; City of Concord Housing Element (Nov. 7, 2014), http://www.cityofconcord.org/pdf/projects/housingElement/11072014.pdf; Contra Costa County Housing Element (Dec. 2, 2014), http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/documentcenter/view/30916. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 98 of ? R/ECAPs, since, although families with children disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs, the occupancy codes and restrictions in place in those areas do not appear to be more relaxed than in higher opportunity areas. Private discrimination Private discrimination is discussed in greater detail in the Segregation section. Private discrimination is a significant contributing factor to the development of R/ECAPs. Blacks and Latinos who receive poor treatment when seeking housing are ultimately forced to live in neighborhoods with a high concentration of minorities. Source of income discrimination Source of income discrimination is discussed in greater detail in the Segregation section. Source of income discrimination is a major contributing factor to R/ECAPs. Blacks are nine times more likely to live in communities with high levels of poverty and lower home values.184 Suburban landlords’ refusal to rent to voucher holders may account for this large disparity.185 4.4 Disparities in Access to Opportunity The following section describes locational differences and disparities experienced by different groups in accessing key features of opportunity: educational quality, employment, transportation, low poverty exposure, and environmental health. Access to neighborhoods with high levels of opportunity is made more difficult due to discrimination and insufficient range and supply of housing in such neighborhoods. In addition, the continuing legacy of discrimination and segregation can impact the availability of quality infrastructure, educational resources, environmental protections, and economic drivers, all of which can create disparities in access to opportunity. Educational Opportunities Housing and school policies are mutually reinforcing, which is one reason why access to educational opportunities is included in the Assessment of Fair Housing. At the most general level, because of the disparities in income and wealth across different racial and ethnic groups, school districts with the greatest amount of affordable housing will tend to attract larger numbers of low and moderate income families. Because school-wide test scores are primarily (but not entirely) a reflection of student demographics, school districts that have excluded affordable housing will tend to have higher income households and higher 184 Tracy Jan, The One Area Where Racial Disparities in Housing Have Disappeared, THE WASHINGTON POST (May 5, 2017), https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2017/05/05/the-one-area-where-racial- disparities-in-housing-has-disappeared/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.dc0440149b12. 185 Id. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 99 of ? proficiency scores. These higher scores, along with other measures of “perceived” school quality, tend to attract higher income families to buy homes, further increasing the overall cost of housing in these higher rated school districts, and creating a stronger exclusionary effect. Fiscally, a combination of higher student need and lower local revenues may deprive schools in the lower income districts of the resources they need to compete with schools in districts that have less affordable housing, and fewer educational needs, creating a cycle in which such districts are increasingly less desirable. Within school districts, school assignment policies can have similar effects, though the greatest disparities are usually across school district lines. California has taken significant steps to address disparities in local school funding, through the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), but funding disparities remain for the highest need districts, exacerbated by the impacts of local private and parental contributions, school facilities investment, and by variations in local policies on distributing supplemental funds. A related issue is the effect of high concentration of low income students within schools. Although the precise thresholds are not understood with precision,186 it is clear that academic outcomes for low income students are depressed by the presence of high proportions of low income classmates, and that similarly situated low income students perform at higher levels in lower poverty schools. The research on racial segregation is consistent with the research on poverty concentration – positive levels of school integration lead to improved short term and long term educational outcomes for all students.187 For these reasons, it is important wherever possible to reduce school-based poverty concentration as much as feasible, and to give low income families greater access to lower poverty, racially diverse public schools. One of the most striking aspects of the data on Contra Costa County’s multiple school districts is the rapid demographic changes that have occurred over the past ten years, especially the rapidly increasing rates of Latino and Asian-American enrollment in several local districts, and corresponding decreases in White enrollment rates. To the extent that these trends are associated with increasing racial and economic segregation across school districts, and decreased access to high performing schools for children in certain racial and ethnic groups, they become fair housing issues as well, and make it even more important to coordinate housing and education policy. As the data indicate, the greatest disparities in access to high performing schools occur across district lines, but even within school districts, housing and school officials can work together to equalize student investments and outcomes. 186 See Roslyn Mickelson, “Is There Systematic Meaningful Evidence of School Poverty Thresholds?” (National Coalition on School Diversity Research Brief, September 2018), http:/school-diversity.org/wp- content/uploads/2018/09/NCSD_Brief14.pdf. 187 See Jennifer Ayscue, Erica Frankenberg, & Genevieve Siegel-Hawley, The Complementary Benefits of Racial and Socioeconomic Diversity in Schools (National Coalition on School Diversity Research Brief, March 2017), https://school-diversity.org/pdf/DiversityResearchBriefNo10.pdf. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 100 of ? Disparities in access to proficient schools The HUD School Proficiency Index ranges from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating the presence of higher quality neighborhoods schools. In California, the HUD School Proficiency Index uses data from the Great Schools 2013-14 dataset. While the index is initially computed for Census block groups, HUD also estimates the index for protected classes at the jurisdiction level (see Table 1)188. The HUD School Proficiency Index relies on the geographic proximity of local schools to persons residing in the designated census block groups. These are not necessarily the same schools that individual children are assigned to (the HUD index does not use actual school assignment zones), but since all the school districts in Contra Costa County primarily assign children to their neighborhood schools, the HUD index will serve as a good proxy.189 Overall, there is considerable divergence across racial and ethnic groups in neighborhood access to high-performing elementary schools. Table 1190 (from HUD AFFHT191) shows that the elementary schools to which non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics have access are lower performing than those of all other racial groups. By contrast, schools attended by non- Hispanic Whites are the highest-performing, followed closely by non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islanders. Similar results are evident at the regional level. Tables 2 through 5192 appear to show little variability of school proficiency across racial/ethnic groups within the jurisdictions, but do point to profound differences across locations. From table 2 we observe the racial and ethnic groups in Antioch obtaining school proficiency scores in the 30s and 40s. In Concord (table 3), these values are in the 40s and 50s, while in Pittsburg (table 4), the scores are in the teens and 20s. Finally, school proficiency index scores in Walnut Creek (table 5) are about 90 for each racial and ethnic group. Disparities in access to proficient schools, relationships to residential living patterns Contra Costa County Map 1 depicts the HUD school proficiency index for Contra Costa County. Access to proficient schools varies across the County. Schools are lower performing in the eastern and northern 188 Higher numbers on these indices correspond to more opportunity: e.g. lower poverty, more proficient schools, higher proximity to jobs, etc. 189 Many of the Contra Costa County districts have some form of intra -district choice, which are used by a relatively small percentage of students. If, as reported to us anecdotally, these intra-district school transfer policies are utilized by higher income families, or by a disproportionately high percentage of White families, then the HUD proficiency index would tend to underestimate disparities in access to educational opportunity. 190 See the column entitled “School Proficiency Index”. 191 AFFHT refers to the HUD AFFH Data and Mapping Tool. 192 See the column entitled “School Proficiency Index”. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 101 of ? neighborhoods of the County, including the cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg and Richmond (see also maps 7, 8, and 9). School proficiency index values are higher in the central and southern sections of the jurisdiction, of which Walnut Creek is a part (see also map 10). Overlaying race and ethnicity over school proficiency levels reveals correspondences at the jurisdiction level between these factors. Maps 2 - 6 examine the relationships between school proficiency and race/ethnicity at the jurisdiction level. From map 4, we observe the extent to which non-Hispanic Blacks appear to concentrate in neighborhoods across the County with low school proficiency scores. Non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders (see map 5) appear spread across the jurisdiction in neighborhoods with low- and high- performing schools. Map 6 shows the highest concentrations of Hispanics in neighborhoods with low school proficiency scores. We also observe (see maps 11, 12, 13, and 14) concentrations of Mexican and Filipino national origin in neighborhoods of low school proficiency, especially in Antioch, Concord and Pittsburg. Whereas the maps are useful to illustrate high-level visual spatial patterns, the AFFHT raw data permit more fine-grained analysis into relationships between opportunity factors and protected groups. Tables 6 to 10 reflect custom analyses of the AFFH block-level and tract- level raw data.193 Specifically, the tables permit comparisons of average school proficiency index values across the census-tract quintiles of protected groups in the Consortium. Quintiles divide the Consortium’s census tracts into five equally sized groups, after ranking tracts by their shares of protected groups. Table 6 shows the average school proficiency index value for each Census tract quintile of the 2010 non-Hispanic Black population. The average school proficiency index value is only 24.85 for the census tracts in the County with the largest non-Hispanic Black populations (“Very High”). By contrast, the smallest non-Hispanic Black quintile (“Very Low”) has the highest average school proficiency value of 88.05. Across all Census tracts in the jurisdiction, the average school proficiency index score is 56.52. Table 7 shows a similar pattern for the Hispanic population, with the highest average index value in the census tracts with low Hispanic populations, and the lowest average index value in those census tracts with more Hispanics. The trend is reversed for non-Hispanic Whites, as evident in table 8, with schools performing better on average in those Census tracts that have more non-Hispanic Whites. Patterns are a bit different for non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders, as evident in table 9. Average school performance is high in the highest and middle quintiles of Asian population. The averages in the other three quintiles approximate the County average, suggesting a lower 193 Raw data version AFFHT0004, from November 2017. The school proficiency index data are summarized from block groups to tracts for using a tract-to-block group crosswalk from Mable Geocorr (http://mcdc.missouri.edu/websas/geocorr14.html). 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 102 of ? correlation between presence of Asians and school performance.194 Similar trends are evident regionally (see tables 12, 13, 14, and 15). The five most frequent places of birth for the foreign-born population in the jurisdiction are Mexico, the Philippines, China (excluding Hong Kong and Taiwan), India, and El Salvador. Table 10 shows that the mean school proficiency index score is lowest in the 20 percent of tracts that have the highest population of foreign-born residents from these five countries, and the mean school proficiency index score is highest in the tracts with the fewest such residents.195 Table 11 shows 2017 shares of 4th grade students making or exceeding English/Language Arts and Math standards for each Contra Costa public school district. The lowest scoring school districts on both ELA and Math are Antioch Unified, Pittsburg Unified, West Contra Costa Unified, and John Swett Unified. These four districts also have the highest student poverty rates (see map 22), as measured by share of students receiving free and reduced price meals. By contrast, the highest performing districts on both ELA and Math are Orinda Union, Lafayette, Walnut Creek, and San Ramon Valley. These five districts are well above both the overall County and state shares. Each is also characterized by low student poverty (see map 22) and small concentrations of Hispanic or non-Hispanic Black residents. Region - San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA MSA Map 23 depicts the HUD school proficiency index for the region. Across the five counties in the MSA, there is variation in access to high-performing schools. Neighborhoods in south and east San Francisco County, north and west Contra Costa County, and west Alameda County score lowest on the index. From map 26, we observe the extent to which non-Hispanic Blacks are especially concentrated in neighborhoods across the region with low school proficiency scores, especially in north and northwest Contra Costa County and western Alameda County. Non- Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders (see map 27) by contrast appear spread across the region in locations with low- and high-performing schools. Map 28 shows high concentrations of Hispanics in neighborhoods with low school proficiency scores, such as in northern/northwestern Contra Costa and western Alameda. However, Hispanics also appear located – albeit in smaller densities – in neighborhoods of moderate to high school proficiency, such as in central Contra Costa and Alameda counties and central and southern San Mateo. 194 Pairwise correlations between tract-level school proficiency index scores and: (1) 2010 non-Hispanic Black population, r=-0.5473; (2) 2010 non-Hispanic White population, r=0.6571; (3) 2010 Hispanic population, r=- 0.6009; (4) 2010 non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander, r=0.1026. All except non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander are significant at the 0.05 level; non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander is insignificant. 195 For tables 6, 7, 8 and 10, the difference in the mean school proficiency index between the top (“very high”) and bottom (“very low”) quintiles is statistically significant at the 0.01 level. Two-sample t-test with equal variances. The difference for non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders is insignificant. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 103 of ? The five most frequent places of birth for the foreign-born population in the San Francisco- Oakland-Hayward, CA region are Mexico, China,196 the Philippines, Vietnam, and India. Table 16 shows that the mean school proficiency index score is lowest in the 20 percent of tracts that have the highest population of foreign-born residents from these five countries, and the mean school proficiency index score is highest in the tracts with the fewest such residents. Regionally, Mexicans and Filipinos in particular appear most highly concentrated in locations with the lowest performing schools. Local programs, policies, or funding mechanisms that affect disparities in access to proficient schools Academic achievement and school spending vary widely across Contra Costa County, with the reasons for these disparities remaining complex.197 In the 2010-2011 school year, the County’s top-spending district, Orinda Elementary, spent $9,473 per student. Orinda’s proficiency rates are among the highest in the County (see table 11). Orinda receives about one-third of their funding from parcel taxes, foundations, and parent donations, which gives them the option to spend their budget on “luxuries” that some less affluent districts cannot afford, such as small class sizes, art teachers, and expanded programs and staff198. Districts with high proportions of low income and at-risk students benefit from California’s redistributive Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF), and receive additional funding based on student need. For example, in one of the County’s lowest-scoring districts, West Contra Costa, a higher percentage of children from low-income families translated into additional income to help level the playing field. Nonetheless, low-income students in West Contra Costa and similar districts are faced with continuing educational challenges. Low income students, defined as students whose families earn below 185 percent of the federal poverty line, make up most of the total student population in West Contra Costa. In the district-run schools, they make up 70 percent, and in charter schools, they make up 81 percent of the total student body.199 English learners make up approximately one-third of students. The performance gap between West Contra Costa students and students across California and the rest of Contra Costa County widens each year.200 A 2017 report published by Contra Costa County Public Schools revealed that the percentage of students in west County on-level in Kindergarten has stayed low and flat through 196 HUD AFFH data excludes Hong Kong and Taiwan. 197 T. Harrington (2011). Study shows some East Bay districts get bigger bang for their bucks than others. Oakland, CA: East Bay Times. https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2011/06/04/study-shows-some-east-bay- districts-get-bigger-bang-for-their-bucks-than-others/ 198 Id. 199 Go Public Schools 2017, available at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1- WyDjVXlo2nakX7gs2tj3KBSOhn0X6XY/view 200 Id. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 104 of ? elementary, middle, and high school—hovering overall at just one in three students proficient in English and Language Arts and one in four in Math.201 In West Contra Costa, 44 percent of all ninth graders received at least one D or F grade in the 2016-2017 school year, and only eight out of 537 English Learning eighth grade students (1.5 percent) met Math standards. In eleventh grade, only seven English Learner students (1.6 percent) did. In the last ten years, only four schools in West Contra Costa—Middle College High School San Pablo, Hanna Ranch Elementary, Olinda Elementary, and Kensington Elementary—received the title of California Distinguished School, a state-recognized title that honors exemplary public schools based on performance and progress in narrowing achievement gaps. In comparison, the rest of Contra Costa County, including but not limited to San Ramon Valley Unified School District and Mt. Diablo Unified School District, is home to over eighty California Distinguished Schools.202 The impact of poverty and high student need in several of the County’s school districts is exacerbated by high rates of demographic change and student turnover. Countywide, during the twenty year period from 1997-2017, White public school enrollment declined by almost 30,000 students, while Latino enrollment increased by over 30,000 students, and Asian/Pacific Islander enrollment rose by over 10,000 students (see figure 1 in appendix). At the same time, the overall student poverty rate (as measured inexactly by the percentage of students eligible for free and reduced price lunch) in the County increased dramatically, from 29 percent to 41 percent.203 Importantly, these demographic changes in the schools were not distributed evenly across the County’s school districts – they followed the path of affordable housing and concentrated in districts that included communities with more open housing policies – in particular Antioch, Mt. Diablo, Oakley, Pittsburg, and West Contra Costa (see table 18).204 Other districts saw increased Latino enrollment, but relatively stable enrollment of other racial and ethnic groups. These districts, which include Brentwood, Byron, Knightsen, Liberty, and Martinez, have the potential of becoming stable, racially and economically integrated school districts, if the right investments in schools, housing, and community infrastructure are made. The remainder of Contra Costa’s school districts appear to be more racially isolated, with relatively small percentages of non-White students. As illustrated by the school proficiency data (see appendix), these are also some of the highest performing schools in the County. These districts have the capacity to easily absorb a substantial influx of economic diversity without any loss of perceived quality or student outcomes. Consistent with these observations, the data show that the most serious “segregation” problem in the County is not within school districts, but across school districts. Only the San 201 N. Walchuk, M. Lopez, T. Kang, E. Ruiz Rodriguez, S. Ramirez, B. Vickers (2017). West Contra Costa Kids Can: Second Annual Student Outcomes Report. https://gopublicschoolswcc.org/2017/11/wcckidscan2017launch/ 202 California Distinguished Schools Program. California Department of Education. https://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/sr/cs/ 203 For 1997-98 data, see here: https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sh/cw/filesafdc.asp. For 2017-18 data, see here: https://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/sd/filessp.asp. Data are only for public school students. 204 Table 18 shows the absolute and percentage change in enrollment by school district, 1997-98 to 2017-18. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 105 of ? Ramon, West Contra Costa, and Mount Diablo districts have elevated levels of segregation between White students and Black or Latino students. In these districts the cross-county levels of African-American segregation (using the standard “dissimilarity index”205) are quite high, and Latino segregation also approach high levels (see table 17). The policies and practices that underlay patterns of school segregation are largely housing practices, including historical (20th century) disinvestment and segregation, local zoning and land use policies and practices (as discussed in the preceding section on Contributing Factors to Segregation), placement of subsidized housing, administration of the housing choice voucher program, housing discrimination in the private market, and personal choices made by families within the constraints of a market that is distorted by these policies and practices. But education policies also influence these patterns of segregation. These housing-related educational policies that affect housing segregation include school district lines and school assignment zones that closely mirror local demographic divisions across and within districts, school district “choice” policies that exacerbate school concentrations of poverty, test- or criteria-based admission to choice schools, lack of free student transportation for students opting for intradistrict transfers, absence of free inter-district transfers for low income students attending high poverty schools (and unregulated access to inter-district transfers for higher income students), unregulated private and parental contributions to local schools, and unequal capital expenditures (school construction and renovation) across schools within a district. There have also been a number of positive steps:  In August of 2017, in response to a movement for five schools to secede from the Mt. Diablo Unified school district, the Contra Costa County Board of Education recommended against the formation of a new district, which would have increased the concentration of low income children in the remaining Mt. Diablo district, decreased overall revenues for the district, and diminished the opportunities for racial and economic integration for all students in the current Mt. Diablo district.206  School districts are actively taking steps to incentivize teachers to stay. In the West Contra Costa Unified school district, the board is increasing teachers’ compensation and considering the development of new housing specifically for teachers to encourage teachers to remain in the district.207 According to a district survey, 70 205 The dissimilarity index represents the extent to which the distribution of two groups differs across census tracts. Values range from 0 to 100, with a value of zero representing perfect integration between two groups and 100 representing perfect segregation. 206 M. Robertson (2018). Maps show the segregation within Bay Area school districts. San Francisco: SF Gate. https://www.sfgate.com/education/article/maps-bay-area-school-segregation-district-zone-vox- 12519144.php#photo-14928885 207 T. Harrington (2018). Higher Pay, Smaller Classes, Housing Perks in West Contra Costa Unified School District’s Plan to Attract Teachers. Oakland, CA: East Bay Express. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 106 of ? percent of school employees who rent considered leaving because of high housing costs.208  California’s reliance on state funding of local education and the 2014 Local Control Funding Formula have helped to equalize funding for poor districts. Employment Opportunities Disparities in access to employment opportunities Employment opportunities are depicted by two HUD indices: (1) the labor market engagement index and (2) the jobs proximity index. The labor market engagement index provides a summary description of the relative intensity of labor market engagement and human capital in a neighborhood, taking into account the unemployment rate, labor-force participation rate, and percent with a bachelor’s degree or higher. The index ranges from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating higher labor force participation and human capital. The jobs proximity index measures the physical distances between jobs and places of residence. It too varies from 0 to 100, and higher scores point to better accessibility to employment opportunities. Although these indices are initially computed for census block groups (job proximity) or tracts (labor marker engagement), HUD also estimates them for protected classes at the Consortium, entitlement jurisdiction and region level. There is considerable variation in labor market engagement by race/ethnicity in the Consortium (see table 1). Non-Hispanic Whites (68.76) and non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders (66.87) score the highest on the labor market engagement index, while non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics are the lowest in the County, each with scores around 32. Across race and ethnic categories, Pittsburg’s and Antioch’s labor market engagement index values are all under 40. Concord has labor market engagement index values in the mid-40s to high-50s. Walnut Creek obtains labor market engagement index values around 90. See tables 2-5. However, jobs proximity does not discernibly track race/ethnicity at the Consortium, entitlement jurisdiction or regional level (see tables 1-5). Similarly, looking at maps 33 and 55 the jobs proximity index varies widely by census tract and doesn’t appear to follow any particular spatial pattern. As a result, from here we focus attention on labor market engagement. https://www.eastbayexpress.com/SevenDays/archives/2018/07/06/higher-pay-smaller-classes-housing- perks-in-west-contra-costa-unified-school-districts-plan-to-attract-teachers 208 Id. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 107 of ? Disparities in access to employment, relationships to residential living patterns Contra Costa County Consortium Map 32 shows the spatial variability of labor market engagement for the Contra Costa Consortium. Labor market engagement is especially high in central and southern neighborhoods of the County, including Walnut Creek (see also map 42). By contrast, the index obtains more moderate and lower scores in some northwestern tracts (including Richmond) as well as northeastern neighborhoods such as Pittsburg and Antioch (see also maps 39 to 41). From map 36 we observe that non-Hispanic Blacks are located predominantly in those County neighborhoods with low to moderate labor market engagement. Map 38 reveals a similar pattern for Hispanics, whereby the largest concentrations are in these same tracts. By contrast, non-Hispanic Whites (map 35) and non-Hispanic Asians (map 37) are more frequently located in neighborhoods with higher labor market participation and human capital. We also observe (see maps 43, 44, 45, and 46) concentrations of persons with Mexican and Filipino national origin in neighborhoods of low labor market engagement, especially in Antioch, Concord and Pittsburg. We compare average labor market engagement index values across the census-tract quintiles of protected groups.209 Table 19 shows the average labor market engagement index value for each quintile of 2010 non-Hispanic Black Population. The average labor market engagement index value is only 32.88 for the segment of census tracts in the County with the largest non-Hispanic Black populations (“Very High”). By contrast, the smallest non-Hispanic Black population quintile (“Very Low”) has the highest average labor market engagement value of 84.17. Across all census tracts in the jurisdiction, the average labor market engagement index score is 60.06. Table 20 shows a similar pattern for the Hispanic population, with an average index value highest for the census tracts with low Hispanic populations and lowest for those with more Hispanics. The trend is reversed for non-Hispanic Whites, as evident in table 21, with index scores higher on average in those census tracts with more non-Hispanic Whites. Patterns are a bit different for Asians or Pacific Islanders, as evident in table 22. Average labor market performance is highest in the highest quintile of Asian population and lowest in the lowest quintile. The averages in the other three quintiles approximate the County 209 These analyses use AFFH raw data version AFFHT0004, from November 2017. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 108 of ? average, once again suggesting a lower correlation between presence of Asians and labor market engagement.210 Similar trends are evident regionally (see tables 29 to 32). The five most frequent places of birth for the foreign-born population in the jurisdiction are Mexico, the Philippines, China,211 India, and El Salvador. Table 23 shows that the mean labor market index score is lowest in census tracts with the highest population of individuals from these five countries, and highest in those with the fewest such residents.212 Map 53 depicts the Job Availability Index as computed by the UC Davis Center for Regional Change, using data from the 2014 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics / Origin- Destination Employment Statistics database. The index measures the number of jobs per 1,000 people within a five-mile radius of the census tract center-point. Red areas depict neighborhoods with fewer available jobs, while tracts shaded in green denote locations with more jobs close by. Areas to the west and northeast, including Richmond, Antioch and Concord, have low levels of job availability, whereas neighborhoods in central Contra Costa score highest on the index. As evident in tables 24, 25, and 28, average job availability is lowest in census tracts that have the highest non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and foreign-born populations, respectively. By contrast, job availability is on average considerably higher in the neighborhoods with the largest non-Hispanic white population (see table 26).213 Region - San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA MSA Map 54 depicts the labor market engagement index for the region. Neighborhoods in north and west Contra Costa County and west Alameda County score lowest on the index. Non-Hispanic Blacks are distributed across the region in those neighborhoods with low labor market scores, especially in north and northwest Contra Costa County and western Alameda County (see map 58). Non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders (see map 59) by contrast appear spread across the region in locations with low- and high-index values. Map 60 shows high concentrations of Hispanics in neighborhoods with low labor market engagement, such as in northern/northwestern Contra Costa and western Alameda. 210 Pairwise correlations between tract-level labor market engagement index scores and: (1) 2010 non-Hispanic black population, r=-0.4857; (2) 2010 non-Hispanic white population, r=0.4973; (3) 2010 Hispanic population, r=-0.6887; (4) 2010 Asian or Pacific Islander, r=0.2506. All are significant at the 0.05 level. 211 HUD AFFH data excludes Hong Kong and Taiwan. 212 For all five tables (19 through 23), the difference in the mean labor market engagements index between the top (“very high”) and bottom (“very low”) quintiles is statistically significant. Two-sample t-test with equal variances. 213 For tables 24, 25, 26, and 28, the difference in the mean job availability index between the top (“very high”) and bottom (“very low”) quintiles is statistically significant. Two-sample t-test with equal variances. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 109 of ? The five most frequent places of birth for the foreign-born population in the San Francisco- Oakland-Hayward, CA region are Mexico, China,214 the Philippines, Vietnam, and India. Table 33 shows that the mean labor market engagement index score is lowest in the 20 percent of tracts with the highest population of individuals from these five countries, and highest in the tracts with the fewest such residents. Local programs, policies, or funding mechanisms that affect disparities in access to employment Formerly incarcerated residents of Contra Costa County face barriers to employment. Nearly all of the top employers in the County ask applicants on their initial application whether they have been convicted of a felony.215 This creates the possibility of employer discrimination against those seeking reentry. In 2014, a “Ban the Box” rule applying only to state agencies, cities, counties and special districts did go into effect, eliminating questions regarding criminal convictions on applications to said employers. Although employers in California cannot legally ask about arrests that did not lead to a conviction, such information may also be obtained from for-profit, third-party providers. In a study done by the Safe Return Project, a Richmond-based research and action initiative aimed at improving community reintegration after incarceration, one in three respondents to a survey of formerly incarcerated residents in west Contra Costa County had worked since being released from prison. At the time of the survey, 78 percent of the respondents were unemployed, an unemployment rate that is nearly seven times that of the State of California.216 Transportation Opportunities Disparities in access to transportation opportunities Transportation opportunities are depicted by two HUD AFFH indices: (1) the transit trips index and (2) the low transportation cost index. The transit trips index measures how often low-income families in a neighborhood use public transportation. The index ranges from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating a higher likelihood that residents in a neighborhood utilize public transit. The low transportation cost index measures cost of transportation and proximity to public transportation by neighborhood. It too varies from 0 to 100, and higher scores point to lower transportation costs in that neighborhood. While these indices are initially computed for census tracts, HUD also estimates them for protected classes at the Consortium, entitlement jurisdiction, and region level. Neither HUD AFFH transportation index, at any level, varies noticeably across racial/ethnic categories. All 214 HUD AFFH data excludes Hong Kong and Taiwan. 215 Andres Abarra, et al (2011). Community Reintegration and Employment in Contra Costa County. Safe Return Project. http://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/reintegration-employment-final.pdf 216 Id. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 110 of ? races and ethnicities score highly on both indices with values close in magnitude. If these indices are accurate depictions of transportation accessibility, then we would conclude from them that all racial and ethnic classes have high and relatively equal access to transportation at both the jurisdiction and regional levels. If anything, both indices appear to take slightly higher values for non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics, suggesting better access to transit and lower costs for these protected groups. Disparities in access to transportation, relationships to residential living patterns Maps 63 through 74 show the lack of spatial variability in the two HUD transportation indices at all levels. The two indices each take mostly high values. Further, higher and moderate index scores are mostly interspersed, such that discernible spatial patterns aren’t evident. There does not appear to be significant disparities in access to transit on the basis of race or ethnicity in the Consortium, region, or entitlement jurisdictions, based upon these HUD indices. However, other data suggest disparate access to transportation opportunity. Map 75 shows the census tract percentages of workers 16 years of age and above with commute times of at least 45 minutes. Longer commute times may result from a lack of proximate jobs or from poor transportation access. Higher percentages of workers have longer commute times in north-eastern Contra Costa, including Pittsburg and Concord. Smaller percentages of workers have long commutes in much of central Contra Costa – places such as Walnut Creek and Lafayette. Tables 34 through 37 show that average percentages of workers with long commutes are generally highest in the census tract quintiles with large populations of protected groups. For instance, on average 37.7 percent of workers in the quintile of census tracts with “Very High” non-Hispanic black populations have long commutes, whereas less than 29 percent have long commutes in the quintile of tracts with the smallest (i.e. “Very Low”) black populations. Similar trends are observed for Hispanics (table 35), non-Hispanic Asians (table 36) and the foreign-born population (table 37).217 Figure 2 (see appendix) shows the 2015 share of transit assets that are past their useful life for Bay Area transit operators, using data from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Regional Transit Capital Inventory.218 Assets include vehicles, systems, guideway elements, and facilities and stations. BART, Tri Delta Transit, WestCat, AC Transit, and County Connection all operate in Contra Costa County. Of these, all except County Connection exceed the regional average share of assets past their useful life. Close to half of BART assets and over a quarter of Tri Delta Transit assets are past their useful life. BART, Tri 217 For all four tables (34 through 37), the difference in the mean percentage of workers with long commutes between the top (“very high”) and bottom (“very low”) quintiles is statistically significant. Two-sample t-test with equal variances. 218 Vital Signs. www.vitalsigns.mtc.ca.gov 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 111 of ? Delta Transit, and WestCAT are all among the operators with the highest shares of assets past their useful life. Aging transit infrastructure negatively impacts system reliability and readiness. Finally, information from the Center for Neighborhood Technology AllTransit219 database provides additional insight into transit accessibility issues for Contra Costa as a whole and Richmond, Antioch, Concord, Walnut Creek, and Pittsburg. According to AllTransit, the County and all five of the cities have over 80 percent of their jobs within a half mile of transit.220 However, there is considerable fluctuation across locations in terms of jobs near high frequency transit,221 here defined as having average headways of 15 minutes or less. For instance, 0.0 percent of jobs in Antioch and only 0.6 percent of jobs in Pittsburg are within a half mile of high-frequency transit. By contrast in Concord, 12.8 percent of jobs are near frequent full-day transit and 17.7 percent of jobs are close to frequent rush-hour transit. In Richmond, 13.6 percent of jobs are near frequent full-day transit while 21.4 percent of jobs are within a half mile of frequent rush-hour transit. Finally, in Walnut Creek, 24.2 percent of jobs are close to full-day frequent transit and 40.2 percent of jobs are near to frequent rush hour transit. For Contra Costa County overall, 11.6 percent of jobs are near full-day high- frequency transit and 15.4 percent are close to frequent rush hour transit options. These figures may not reflect the May 2018 opening of the eBART station in Antioch. Similar differences are evident when examining the percentage of low-income households within a half mile of high-frequency full-day or rush-hour transit. Only 11.5 percent of households making under $50,000 are within a half mile of high-frequency full day transit, and only 14.4 percent are near to rush-hour high-frequency transit. In Antioch, 0.0 percent of low-income households live near to frequency transit. Only 1.2 percent of Pittsburg low- income households live nearby to full-day or rush-hour high frequency transit. For Concord, 8.8 percent and 11.2 percent of low-income households live within a half mile of full-day or rush-hour frequent transit, respectively. In Walnut Creek, these same percentages are higher, at 12.6 percent and 20.3 percent. Finally, in Richmond, 20.4 percent and 33.1 percent of low- income households live within a half mile to full-day and rush-hour frequent transit, respectively. 219 AllTransit. alltransit.cnt.org 220 Specifically the percentages are as follows: Contra Costa County – 82.3%; Richmond CA – 81.8%; Pittsburg CA – 88.8%; Antioch CA – 91.2%; Walnut Creek CA – 93.4%; Concord CA – 94.4%. 221 Includes frequent around the clock transit, frequent rush hour transit, or frequent full day transit. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 112 of ? Local programs, policies, or funding mechanisms that affect disparities in access to employment Access to employment and services can be hindered for some County residents because of existing transportation infrastructure. For example, trips to and from Contra Costa County are served only by a few transit routes, forming a service-level gap in comparison with the rest of the Bay Area.222 Ongoing efforts such as the Alameda County Service Expansion Plan seek to close the gap, and the Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) Silicon Valley extension includes extensions to east County. Additionally, accessibility gaps in existing public transit pose difficulties for residents with disabilities. An absence of a forum for leadership and a lack of standards, coordination, or a structural platform have led to an understanding that accessible transportation in the County needs to be improved.223 Reliable public transportation is crucial in the ability of residents to access employment opportunities and an array of services. In 2018, voters in all nine Bay Area counties voted to pass Regional Measure 3, which will increase tolls on the region’s seven state-owned bridges—four of which are in Contra Costa County—by $3 over several years, with a final increase occurring in 2025--the revenue from which will fund transportation projects aimed at long-term reduction of traffic congestion.224 The measure, which needed a simple majority to pass, had 54 percent of the vote from all nine counties combined; however, in Contra Costa and Solano counties, it did not pass. Rep. Mark DeSaulnier from Concord criticized the Legislature’s and Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s process in developing its master project list and claimed that those who will pay the bulk of the new tolls—commuters from Alameda and Contra Costa counties—will see little congestion relief from them.225 Among other concerns cited for opposing the measure was the idea that higher bridge tolls amount to a regressive tax that hit lower- and middle- income workers already struggling with rising housing costs.226 222 Alameda County Transportation Commission (2016). Alameda Countywide Transit Plan. https://www.alamedactc.org/files/managed/Document/19157/AlamedaCTC_CountywideTransitPlan.pdf 223 Accessible Transportation in Contra Costa County (2017). http://www.co.contra- costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/47102/Accessible-Transit-in-Contra-Costa-County-Final9-19-17?bidId= 224 D. Brekke (2018). 10-Plus Things to Know: Regional Measure 3, the Proposed Bay Area Bridge Toll Increase. KQED News. https://www.kqed.org/news/11671240/10-things-to-know-regional-measure-3-the-proposed- bay-area-bridge-toll-increase 225 Id. 226 Id. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 113 of ? Access to Low Poverty Neighborhoods Disparities in access to low poverty neighborhoods The HUD Low Poverty Index ranges from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating the less exposure to poverty in a neighborhood. While the index is initially computed for census block groups, HUD also estimates the index for protected classes at the Contra Costa Consortium, entitlement jurisdiction and region level. There is considerable divergence across racial and ethnic groups in neighborhood exposure to poverty. Neighborhoods in which non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics live are characterized by higher poverty than neighborhoods of all other racial groups. By contrast, non-Hispanic Whites have the greatest access to low-poverty neighborhoods, followed closely by non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islanders. Similar results are evident in Concord and Pittsburg, as well as regionally. Disparities in access to low poverty neighborhoods, related to residential living patterns Contra Costa County Consortium Map 76 depicts the HUD low poverty index for the Consortium. Access to low poverty neighborhoods varies across Contra Costa County. Neighborhoods exhibit higher poverty in the northeastern and western neighborhoods of the Consortium, including in the cities of Richmond, Antioch, and Pittsburg (see also maps 82-84). Poverty is lower in the central and southern sections of the Consortium, of which Walnut Creek is a part (see map 85). Overlaying race and ethnicity over poverty levels reveals correspondences between these factors. Maps 77-81 examine the relationships between poverty and race/ethnicity for the Consortium. From map 79, we observe the extent to which non-Hispanic Blacks appear to concentrate in neighborhoods across the Consortium with higher poverty. Non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders (see map 81) appear spread across the jurisdiction in neighborhoods with low- and high-poverty. Map 80 shows the highest concentrations of Hispanics in neighborhoods with higher poverty. We also see high concentrations of Mexicans in the highest poverty tracts (map 86). We again use AFFHT raw data to undertake more detailed analysis than permitted by the HUD tables, this time into relationships between access to low poverty neighborhoods and protected groups. As before, tables (see appendix) reflect custom analyses of the AFFH tract- 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 114 of ? level raw data.227 Specifically, the tables permit comparisons of average low poverty index values across the census tract quintiles of protected groups. Table 38 shows that, on average, the low poverty index is only 39.46 for the 20 percent of census tracts in the Consortium with the largest non-Hispanic Black populations (“Very High”). By contrast, the low poverty index is 85.41, on average, for the 20 percent of census tracts with the smallest non-Hispanic Black population (“Very Low”). This means that poverty is lowest (on average) in those tracts with the smallest non-Hispanic black populations, and highest (on average) in neighborhoods with the largest non-Hispanic black populations. Table 39 shows a similar pattern for the Hispanic population. The trend is reversed for non- Hispanic Whites (see Table 40), such that the low poverty index is larger on average in those neighborhoods with more non-Hispanic whites. Across all census tracts in the Consortium, the low poverty index score is 64.96, on average. Patterns are a bit different for non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders, as evident in table 41. Accessibility to low poverty locales is on average highest in the “Very High” and “Moderate” quintiles of Asian population. However, the differences across the quintiles are less pronounced, suggesting a lower correlation between presence of Asians and low poverty.228 Similar trends are evident regionally (see tables 48, 49, 50, and 51). The five most frequent places of birth for the foreign-born population in the Consortium are Mexico, the Philippines, China,229 India, and El Salvador. Table 42 shows that the mean low poverty index score is lowest in the 20 percent of tracts with the highest population of individuals from these five countries, and highest in the tracts with the fewest such residents.230 Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)231 benefits are received by low-income households. To be eligible, gross monthly income must be at or below 130 percent of the poverty line while net income must be at or below the poverty line.232 As a result, the percent of households in a neighborhood reveals additional information about the degree of impoverishment in different locations. Map 96 shows that the share of households receiving SNAP benefits is highest in the northern/northeastern sections of the County, including Pittsburg and Antioch, as well as in Richmond and other parts in the west. Tables 43-47 show similarly that, on average, receipt of SNAP benefits is higher as a share of households in 227 Raw data version AFFHT0004, from November 2017. The school proficiency index data are summarized from block groups to tracts for using a tract-to-block group crosswalk from Mable Geocorr (http://mcdc.missouri.edu/websas/geocorr14.html). 228 Pairwise correlations between tract-level low poverty index scores and: (1) 2010 non-Hispanic black population, r=-0.4851; (2) 2010 non-Hispanic white population, r=0.5681; (3) 2010 Hispanic population, r=- 0.6798; (4) 2010 non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander, r=0.2233. All are significant at the 0.01 level. 229 HUD AFFH data exclude Hong Kong and Taiwan. 230 For tables 38 to 42, the difference in the mean low poverty index between the top (“very high”) and bottom (“very low”) quintiles is statistically significant at the 0.01 level. Two-sample t-test with equal variances. 231 Previously known as food stamps. 232 (2018). A Quick Guide to SNAP Eligibility and Benefits. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/a-quick-guide-to-snap-eligibility-and-benefits 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 115 of ? neighborhoods with more non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, and foreign-born residents and lower in tracts with more non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Asians.233 Region - San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA MSA Map 97 depicts the HUD low poverty index for the region. Across the five counties in the region, there is variation in access to low poverty neighborhoods. Neighborhoods in north and west Contra Costa County and west Alameda County score lowest on the index. From map 100, we observe the extent to which non-Hispanic Blacks are especially concentrated in neighborhoods across the region with low access to low-poverty neighborhoods, especially in north and northwest Contra Costa County and western Alameda County. Non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders (see map 102) are observed locating across the region in locations with low- and high- poverty census tracts. Map 101 shows high concentrations of Hispanics in neighborhoods with higher poverty, such as, in northern/northwestern Contra Costa and western Alameda. However, Hispanics appear located – albeit once again in smaller densities – in neighborhoods of moderate to low poverty, such as in central Contra Costa and Alameda counties and central and southern San Mateo. The five most frequent places of birth for the foreign-born population in the San Francisco- Oakland-Hayward, CA region are Mexico, China,234 the Philippines, Vietnam, and India. Table 52 shows that the mean low poverty index score is lowest in the 20 percent of tracts with the highest population of individuals from these five countries, and highest in the tracts with the fewest such residents. Local programs, policies, or funding mechanisms that affect disparities in access to low poverty neighborhoods As discussed later, displacement of residents due to economic pressure may affect disparate access to low-poverty neighborhoods. The Bay Area has been facing a major affordable housing crisis for years, and rising housing prices have contributed to the displacement of many low-income residents. From 2011-2015, Contra Costa County gained thousands of net residents from nearby Alameda County, San Mateo County, and San Francisco. As lower- income residents have been displaced from more expensive parts of the Bay Area, poverty in Eastern Contra Costa County has increased. From 2000-2014, the increase in poverty in Bay Point and Antioch was the highest in the Bay Area. 233 For tables 41 to 45, the difference in the mean percent of households receiving SNAP between the top (“very high”) and bottom (“very low”) quintiles is statistically significant at the 0.01 level. Two-sample t-test with equal variances. 234 HUD AFFH data exclude Hong Kong and Taiwan. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 116 of ? Access to Environmentally Healthy Neighborhoods Disparities in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods The HUD Environmental Health Index ranges from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating lower exposure to harmful toxins at a neighborhood level, and therefore better environmental quality. While the index is initially computed for census tracts, HUD also estimates the index for protected classes at the Consortium, entitlement jurisdiction, and regional levels. There are modest differences across racial and ethnic groups in neighborhood access to environmental quality. All of the racial/ethnic groups in the Consortium obtain environmental health scores in the middle of the national distribution (from the low 40’s to mid- 50’s). Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics have access to somewhat less environmentally healthy neighborhoods than non- Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Asians. Environmental health scores are on the lower half of the national distribution at the regional level, with non-Hispanic Blacks obtaining the lowest value and non-Hispanic Whites the highest.235 Regionally, non-Hispanic whites live in neighborhoods with the highest environmental quality. The residents of Concord have access to lower environment health than the other entitlement jurisdictions and the Consortium and region as a whole. Disparities in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods, relationships to residential living patterns Contra Costa County Consortium Map 105 depicts the HUD environmental health index for the Consortium. The index obtains mostly moderate values across Contra Costa County, and access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods – those with lower exposure to airborne environmental toxins – varies modestly across the jurisdiction. Neighborhoods exhibit lower environmental health scores – indicating more exposure to toxins – in some eastern and northern neighborhoods of the County, including the cities of Richmond and Antioch, as well as some centrally located places like Concord, Pleasant Hill and Walnut Creek. Environmental health appears highest in some southern sections of the County, as well as in some northern neighborhoods including Clyde. Maps 106 - 114 examine the relationships between environmental health and race/ethnicity at the Consortium and entitlement jurisdiction levels. We observe the extent to which non- Hispanic Blacks appear to concentrate in neighborhoods across the County with somewhat lower environmental health (map 108). Non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders appear spread across the jurisdiction in neighborhoods with moderate 235 At both the Consortium and regional level, when comparing the population below the poverty line to the total population, the Environmental Health Index score exhibits a larger drop for non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders than the other races/ethnicities. See AFFH table 12. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 117 of ? environmental health. The patterns for Hispanics appear similar to those of non-Hispanic Blacks. National origin does not appear to align closely to environmental health. The CalEnviroScreen236 data were developed by the California Environmental Protection Agency in April 2013. CalEPA’s objective in developing the tool and data was to “assist California communities by directing state and potentially local government resources toward a common purpose: the revitalization of disadvantaged communities and the pursuit of environmental justice.” The most recent data were released in January 2017, and are employed here. As noted by CalEPA, “People in real life are simultaneously exposed to multiple contaminants from multiple sources and also have multiple stressors based on their health status as well as living conditions. Thus, the resulting cumulative health risk is also often influenced by nonchemical factors such as socioeconomic and health status of the people living in a community.” In response to this, “CalEnviroScreen uses a science-based method for evaluating multiple pollution sources in a community while accounting for a community’s vulnerability to pollution’s adverse effects.” Measures of pollution burden237 and population characteristics238 are combined into a single composite CalEnviroScreen index, which is then mapped and analyzed. Higher values on the index indicate higher cumulative environmental impacts on individuals arising from these burdens and population factors. Maps 125 – 129 show the CalEnviroScreen impacts for Contra Costa County and the four entitlement jurisdictions. In map 125, it is apparent that cumulative environmental impacts are highest in western and northeast sections of the County (yellow to red shaded tracts) and lowest in the central part of the County (green shaded neighborhoods). These sorts of adverse environmental impacts are especially visible in Antioch (map 126), Pittsburg (map 128), and northern sections of Concord (map 127). Impacts are low in Walnut Creek (map 129). Table 53 furthermore shows that non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics have the highest exposures239 to adverse environmental impacts, whereas non-Hispanic Whites and non- Hispanic Asians have lower exposures (as measured by the CalEnviroScreen index). Tables 54, 55, and 58 portray how CalEnviroScreen scores (and therefore cumulative impacts) are higher, on average, in neighborhoods with more non-Hispanic Blacks, Hispanics, and foreign-born residents respectively. Tables 56 and 57 show that mean CalEnviroScreen 236 CalEnviroScreen 3.0 (2018). California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-30 237 Includes (1) exposure indicators such as Ozone, PM2.5, Diesel Particulate Matter, Drinking Water Contaminants, Pesticide Use, Toxic Releases from Facilities, and Traffic Density, and (2) environmental effects indicators such as Cleanup sites, Groundwater Threats, Hazardous Waste Generators and Facilities, Impaired Water Bodies, and Solid Waste Sites and Facilities. 238 Includes (1) sensitive population indicators such as Asthma, Cardiovascular Disease, Low Birth Weight Infants, and (2) socioeconomic factor indicators such as Educational Attainment, Housing Burdened Low Income Households, Linguistic Isolation, Poverty, and Unemployment. 239 Values in table 53 are computed in a similar fashion to how HUD generates tables 1 through 5, above. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 118 of ? scores are lower in neighborhoods with more non-Hispanic Whites and non-Hispanic Asians.240 Region - San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA MSA In map 130 we observe low HUD environmental health index scores in much of Alameda and San Francisco counties, as well as in eastern and north-central Contra Costa County. Maps 131 through 135 overlay race/ethnicity on the Environmental Health Index. As noted above, there is an especially close relationship (see map 133) between non-Hispanic Blacks and low environmental health. Local programs, policies, or funding mechanisms that affect disparities in access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods In April 2017, the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) released a list of communities as part of the implementation of SB 535, a 2012 law that directs the state to make investments to benefit disadvantaged communities that suffer from pollution, socioeconomic, and health challenges.241 To determine which communities are disadvantaged, CalEPA used a screening tool called CalEnviroScreen 3.0 developed by the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. CalEnviroScreen 3.0 identifies communities in California that are disproportionately burdened by multiple sources of pollution and face vulnerability due to socioeconomic factors.242 The highest scoring 25 percent of census tracts were designated as disadvantaged communities. In Contra Costa County, disadvantaged communities include census tracts in North Richmond, Richmond, Pittsburg, San Pablo, Antioch, Rodeo, and Oakley.243 Environmental justice concerns are especially high in Richmond and neighboring areas of west County. Richmond is surrounded by oil refineries, chemical plants, superfund sites, highways, rail yards, and ports which contribute to pollution.244 Residents of Richmond are also exposed to a wide array of industrial contaminants including benzene and mercury. Pollution likely contributes to higher risks of death from heart disease and stroke and greater rates of hospitalization due to asthma in Richmond.245 Health is notably worse for people of 240 For tables 54 to 58, the difference in the mean CalEnviroScreen score between the top (“very high”) and bottom (“very low”) quintiles is statistically significant at the 0.05 level. Two-sample t-test with equal variances. 241 California Climate Investments to Benefit Disadvantaged Communities. CalEPA. https://calepa.ca.gov/envjustice/ghginvest/ 242 CalEnviroScreen 3.0 https://oehha.ca.gov/calenviroscreen/report/calenviroscreen-30 243 Economically Disadvantaged Communities by Census Tract. CalEPA. https://calepa.ca.gov/wp- content/uploads/sites/34/2017/04/SB-535-List-of-DACs_CES30.xlsx 244 J. Kay, C. Katz (2012). Pollution, Poverty and People of Color: Living with Industry. Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/pollution-poverty-people-color-living-industry/ 245 Pollution, Poverty and People of Color. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/pollution-poverty- people-color-living-industry/ 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 119 of ? color in Richmond, and black residents have the worst health indicators of all residents.246 One major refinery, operated by Chevron, has played a large role in the health of Richmond and other surrounding communities. One major incident occurred on August 6, 2012, when a massive fire broke out at the refinery and sent more than 15,000 people to local hospitals.247 Since then, Chevron has paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in penalties due to air pollution violations in recent years.248 Another facility in Richmond, a Chemtrade West Chemical Plant, repeatedly violated air pollution rules between 2009 and 2014.249 North Richmond, an unincorporated part of the County, is located near the Chevron refinery and other hazards. The community is predominantly populated by low-income people of color and is one of the most affordable parts of the Bay Area, but suffers from high poverty and a lack of services. North Richmond may suffer from disinvestment and depressed housing prices due to its reputation as a community that is exposed to greater environmental hazards.250 Lead poisoning is another environmental health hazard that remains a concern in the County. According to Contra Costa Health Services, levels of lead exposure are concentrated in certain areas of the County. Approximately 46 percent of children with elevated blood lead levels in the County are from the Richmond/San Pablo Area while another 26 percent are from the Pittsburg/Antioch area and another 10 percent are from the Concord area.251 Richmond’s housing stock is older than that of Contra Costa County as a whole, and this may contribute to higher levels of lead exposure.252 Other communities with other housing stock may experience high lead exposure, such as Crockett, Martinez, and Port Costa. 246Pollution, Poverty and People of Color. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/pollution-poverty- people-color-living-industry/ 247 C. Lazzeretti, T. Lochner (2017). Refinery fire settlement forces Chevron to implement ‘extrarodinary measures’. Oakland, CA: East Bay Times. http://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/07/24/chevron-settles-with- state-regulators-over-2012-refinery-fire/ 248 D. Cuff (2014). Chevron’s Richmond refinery to pay $278,000 for air pollution violations. San Jose, CA: The Mercury News. http://www.mercurynews.com/2014/09/04/chevrons-richmond-refinery-to-pay-278000-for- air-pollution-violations/ 249 (2017). Air District settles case with Chemtrade West US LLC. Bay Area Air Quality Management District. http://sc-prod.cylogy.com/~/media/files/communications-and-outreach/publications/news- releases/2017/settle_170801_chemtrade-pdf.pdf?la=en 250 R. Rogers (2011). Part 7: North Richmond’s troubled environmental history. Berkeley, CA: Richmond Confidential. http://richmondconfidential.org/2011/08/03/part-7-north-richmonds-troubled-environmental- history/ 251 Facts about Lead Poisoning in Contra Costa County. Contra Costa Health Services. https://cchealth.org/lead- poison/facts.php 252 The Richmond Health Equity Report Card. Contra Costa Health Services. https://cchealth.org/health- data/pdf/Richmond-Health-Equity-Report-Card-Full.pdf 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 120 of ? Summary HUD and other local data show that access to opportunity is highest for non-Hispanic Whites in Contra Costa County. Opportunity metrics also routinely have the highest average scores in County neighborhoods with the most non-Hispanic Whites. By contrast, access to opportunity is lowest for non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics, and metrics are lowest on average in census tracts with more of each of these groups. As compared to these other groups, non-Hispanic Asians and Pacific Islanders appear to live in a wider variety of neighborhoods in terms of access to opportunity. In addition, average opportunity scores are often lower on average in those County neighborhoods with higher numbers of foreign-born individuals from the five most frequent countries. These same overarching trends tend to also recur for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward CA metro area. For example, map 4 from this chapter clearly shows the extreme concentration of non-Hispanic Black residents in those neighborhoods in Contra Costa with the lowest school proficiency index scores. Table 6 further illustrates this outcome, by showing that the school proficiency index is close to 60 points lower on average in the census tracts with the highest non-Hispanic Black populations. Local data point in the same direction. For instance, CalEnviroscreen data point to more severe environmental impacts in those neighborhoods with more Blacks and Hispanics and lower impacts in neighborhoods with more Whites. Geographic trends are also evident. Across various dimensions, access to opportunity is lowest in western and northeastern sections of the County, specifically in the cities of Richmond and Pittsburg, and frequently also Antioch. For instance, tables 2 and 4 show that school proficiency index scores are low in Antioch and Pittsburg, regardless of race or ethnic group. By contrast, access to opportunity is frequently highest in central Contra Costa, including Walnut Creek. Contributing Factors to Disparity in Access to Opportunity Access to financial services Access to financial services is a contributing factor to disparities in access to opportunity. Overall, in 2015, 5.4 percent of households in Contra Costa County were unbanked (those without a checking or savings account) compared to 6.2 percent of households in California and seven percent of households in the United States as a whole.253 A further 16.8 percent of Contra Costa County households are underbanked (those who have a checking and/or a savings account at a bank but still use non-bank financial services such as cash-checking and payday loans) compared to 19.1 percent of California households, and 19.9 percent of U.S. 253 Prosperity Now Scorecard: Contra Costa County, CA. http://scorecard.prosperitynow.org/data-by- location#county/6013 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 121 of ? households.254 Within Contra Costa County, there are significant geographic variations in access to financial services. For example, as of 2015, 17 percent of households in San Pablo were unbanked255 while just 1.1 percent of households in Danville are unbanked.256 There are significant racial disparities as well. While only 1.8 percent of White households and 2.6 percent of Asian households are unbanked, 13.9 percent of Black households and 14.2 percent of Hispanic households are unbanked.257 These racial disparities persist throughout the County. As of 2015, Walnut Creek, which has a population that is 72.8 percent258 Non-Hispanic White has an unbanked rated of 2.6 percent.259 In contrast, Antioch, which has a population that is 31.4 percent Non-Hispanic White260 has an unbanked rate of 7.9 percent.261 Similarly, Pittsburg which has a Non- Hispanic White population a population of 18.8 percent262 has an unbanked rate of 11.5 percent.263 Thus, communities within Contra Costa with large percentages of non-White residents are more likely to lack access to financial services. Availability, type, frequency, and reliability of public transportation The availability of reliable public transportation is a contributing factor to disparities in access to opportunity. Contra Costa County is served by public transit but the quality of service varies across the County. Much of Contra Costa County is connected to other parts of the East Bay as well as to San Francisco and San Mateo County by Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) rail service. The Richmond-Warm Springs/South Fremont and Richmond-Daly City/Millbrae Lines serve El Cerrito and Richmond during peak hours while the Antioch-SFO Line extends east from Oakland to serve Orinda, Lafayette, Walnut Creek, Contra Costa Centre/Pleasant Hill, Concord, and the Pittsburg/Bay Point station. An eastward extension, commonly known as eBART, began service on May 26, 2018. The extension provides service beyond the Pittsburg/Bay Point station to the new Pittsburg Center and Antioch stations. BART is an important form of transportation that helps provide Contra Costa County residents access to jobs and services in other parts of the Bay Area. The Capitol Corridor 254 Prosperity Now Scorecard: Contra Costa County, CA http://scorecard.prosperitynow.org/data-by- location#county/6013 255 Prosperity Now Scorecard: San Pablo, CA. http://scorecard.prosperitynow.org/data-by- location#city/668294 256 Prosperity Now Scorecard: Danville, CA. http://scorecard.prosperitynow.org/data-by-location#city/617988 257 Prosperity Now Scorecard: Contra Costa County, CA http://scorecard.prosperitynow.org/data-by- location#county/6013 258 U.S. Census Bureau Quick Facts: Walnut Creek city, CA. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/walnutcreekcitycalifornia/PST045216 259 http://localdata.assetsandopportunity.org/place/6013 260 U.S. Census Bureau Quick Facts: Antioch city, CA. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/tabl e/antiochcitycalifornia/PST045217 261 Prosperity Now Scorecard: Walnut Creek, CA. http://scorecard.prosperitynow.org/data-by- location#city/683346 262 U.S. Census Bureau Quick Facts: Pittsburg city, CA. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/pittsburgcitycalifornia/PST045216 263 Prosperity Now Scorecard: Pittsburg, CA. http://scorecard.prosperitynow.org/data-by-location#city/657456 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 122 of ? route provides rail service between San Jose and Sacramento and serves commuters in Martinez and Richmond. In contrast to rail transportation, bus service is much more fragmented in the County and regionally. Several different bus systems including Tri-Delta Transit, AC Transit, County Connection, and WestCat provide local service in different sections of the County. In the Bay Area, there are 18 different agencies that provide bus service. The lack of an integrated network can make it harder for transit riders to understand how to make a trip that spans multiple operators and add costs during a daily commute.264 For example, an East Bay Regional Local 31-Day bus pass is valid on County Connection, Tri-Delta Transit, and WestCAT, but cannot be used on AC Transit. Additionally, these bus systems often do not have frequent service. In central Contra Costa, County Connection buses may run as infrequently as every 45 to 60 minutes on some routes.265 Within Contra Costa, transit is generally not as robust in east County despite growing demand for public transportation among residents.266 The lack of adequate public transportation makes it more difficult for lower-income people in particular to access jobs. Average transit commutes in Pittsburg and Antioch exceed 70 minutes. In Brentwood, average transit commute times exceed 100 minutes.267 Data indicates that transit is the third largest expense for low income families second only to housing and food spending.268 Since low-income riders often have to utilize multiple transit systems on their commute, transit costs can be extremely high and burdensome as commuters then have to pay multiple different fares. These fares can often be masked by the clipper card, which allows riders to pay for rides on multiple different transit operators but doesn’t provide significant discounts for riders as they transfer such that the first and last mile of a rider’s commute can be the most costly.269 Though many Bay Area operators do have bulk sales programs which are intended to provide reduced rates to social service providers, only the San Francisco Metropolitan Transit Authority and the Valley Transportation Authority have programs that directly provided discounts to low-income riders.270 Despite having housing costs that are below the Bay Area regional average, Antioch has significantly higher average transit costs, when compared to the Bay Area average. This is largely due to the high rate of car ownership in Antioch and the comparatively long distance of 264 R. Amin, S. Barz (2015). Seamless Transit: How to make Bay Area public transit function like one rational, easy-to-use system. http://www.spur.org/sites/default/files/publications_pdfs/SPUR_Seamless_Transit.pdf 265 County Connection maps and schedules. https://countyconnection.com/maps-schedules/ 266 Devin Katayama, The Suburbs: The New Face of Bay Area Homelessness, https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2017/06/26/the-suburbs-the-new-face-of-bay-area-homelessness/; http://confrontingsuburbanpoverty.org/the-communities/east-contra-costa-co-san-francisco/ 267 Vital Signs (2018). Commute Time. http://www.vitalsigns.mtc.ca.gov/commute-time 268 https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/Summary_MTC_Mean_Based_Overview_DRAFT_FINAL.pdf , 4 269 A. Fleisher (2017). How Clipper Masks the Bay Area’s Transit Fare Policy Problems. Spur News. https://www.spur.org/news/2017-08-31/how-clipper-masks-bay-area-s-transit-fare-policy-problems 270 Regional Means-Based Transit Fare Pricing Study (2016). Metropolitan Transportation Commission. https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/1_MTC_Means_Based_TM _1_DRAFT_FINAL.pdf, 23 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 123 of ? commutes.271 Moreover, when transit costs are combined with housing costs, the Antioch/Pittsburg Bay Point area is less affordable than Oakland, where housing costs are much higher.272 In May of 2018, rail service reached east County with the 10 mile long eBART (East Contra Costa BART) extension from the Pittsburg/Bay Point station to Antioch. The eBART may defray some of the cost of travel, by decreasing time spent driving, but will not be easily accessible to residents without cars since it is in the middle of a freeway and is not close to the town center of Pittsburg.273 In the future, eBART may be extended further east to Brentwood.274 Though eBART will increase access to transportation for some residents of east County, its roll out has not been without its issues. eBART had planned for about 5,600 riders per day, but in its first week ridership exceeded 7,000 riders a day. As a result, riders have complained that parking is insufficient and police have reported that riders have taken to parking illegally in dangerous places. While BART claims to be evaluating options for creating more parking, it has not proposed any concrete solutions.275 Thus, some Antioch residents may be forced to drive to the further Pittsburg and Pittsburg-Bay Point stations, increasing the time of riders’ commutes and making it more difficult for them to access jobs in other parts of the County. Lack of access to opportunity due to high housing costs Extremely high housing costs in the Bay Area contribute greatly to disparities in access to opportunity. In 2018, HUD income limits for the Bay Area were among the highest in the country.276 Although Contra Costa County is relatively affordable compared to much of the Bay Area, its housing costs are still quite high. Under HUD's FY 2018 Income limits, which help to determine eligibility for affordable housing programs, a family of four in Contra Costa County with a household income of up to $89,600 is considered low income. A family of four with an income of up to $58,100 is considered very low income, while a family of four with a household income of up to $34,850 is considered extremely low income. According to the California Housing Partnership Corporation, the lowest-income renters in Contra Costa County spend 57 percent of their income on rent. Additionally, when taking housing costs into account, the County's poverty rate increases from 10.8 percent to 16.1 percent. As of 271 Bay Area Housing and Transportation Affordability (2009). Metropolitan Transportation Commission. https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/Transpo_Housing_Affordability-FullRpt.pdf, 24 272 Bay Area Housing and Transportation Affordability (2009). https://mtc.ca.gov/sites/default/files/Transpo_Housing_Affordability-FullRpt.pdf, 25 273 R. Rudick (2018). Editorial: Impressions of BART’s New Line to Antioch. Streetsblog SF. https://sf.streetsblog.org/2018/06/05/editorial-impressions-of-barts-new-line-to-antioch/ 274 Bay Area Rapid Transit (2017). BART Board backs Brentwood Transit Center. https://www.bart.gov/news/articles/2017/news20170511-0 275 D. Brekke (2018). BART’s New Antioch Station Is Very Popular – and Doesn’t Have Enough Parking. KQED News. https://www.kqed.org/news/11672057/barts-new-antioch-station-is-very-popular-and-doesnt-have- enough-parking 276 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. FY 2018 Income Limits Summary. https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il/il2018/2018summary.odn 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 124 of ? 2015, 43.3 percent of Contra Costa's renters spend at least 35 percent of their income on housing and 23.3 percent of homeowners spent at least 35 percent of their income on housing.277 High housing costs can price individuals out of high opportunity areas with access to services, employment opportunities, robust transit, and quality education. Areas of Contra Costa County that offer the highest access to opportunity have some of the highest housing costs in the Bay Area. For example, homes in Orinda had a median sales price of $1,425,000 and Moraga had a median sales price of $1,504,000 as of October 2017.278 Households that devote large portions of their incomes towards housing also have less money available to cover other expenses such as transportation, food, healthcare, and childcare. Additionally, families with children may face even higher housing costs as they may need larger units with multiple bedrooms. Lack of local or regional cooperation A lack of local or regional cooperation contributes to disparities in access to opportunity. The San Francisco Bay Area is traditionally defined as consisting of nine counties (Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma). Within the nine counties there are 101 cities. This municipal fragmentation poses a challenge for regional cooperation. Although there are several regional planning organizations, they have been criticized for being ineffective.279 Key regional agencies include The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), the Bay Area’s council of governments and the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), the Bay Area metropolitan planning organization. In 2017, ABAG and MTC released Plan Bay Area to assess long-range regional transportation and land use needs. To improve coordination, the staff of the two planning agencies merged on July 1, 2017 following the release of the Bay Area 2040 plan.280 The Bay Area 2040 plan is “a state-mandated, integrated long-range transportation, land-use and housing plan that will support a growing economy, provide more housing and transportation choices and reduce transportation-related pollution in the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area.”281 Following the release of this plan, MTC convened CASA: The Committee to House The Bay Area. CASA’s mandate was to increase the stock of affordable housing, preserve existing affordable housing, and protect vulnerable populations from housing instability and 277 Vital Signs (2017). Housing Affordability. http://www.vitalsigns.mtc.ca.gov/housing-affordability 278 R. Scheinin (2017). Housing crisis: East Bay sales and price trends mirror the Bay Area as a whole. San Jose, CA: The Mercury News. http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/11/13/housing-crisis-east-bay-sales-and-price- trends-mirror-the-bay-area-as-a-whole/ 279 L. Braunstein (2015). Mayors Tackling the Bay Area’s Regional Housing, Transportation Challenges. Urban Land Institute. https://urbanland.uli.org/sustainability/mayors-tackling-bay-areas-regional-housing- transportation-challenges/ 280 (2017). ABAG and MTC Staff Join Forces. Metropolitan Transportation Commission. https://mtc.ca.gov/whats-happening/news/abag-and-mtc-staff-join-forces 281 Play Bay Area 2040. The Context. https://www.planbayarea.org/2040-plan/context 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 125 of ? displacement. CASA is expected to release a plan in late 2018 that contains recommendations for increasing the regional stock of affordable housing.282 Despite these changes in regional coordination, local disparities persist within Contra Costa County. High opportunity, majority non-Hispanic White communities such as Orinda have a dearth of affordable units. Further, the affordable units in Orinda are reserved for seniors and adults without school aged children.283 Orinda also lacks the type of local laws that foster affordable housing, such as an inclusionary zoning ordinance or a housing impact fee. In contrast, Richmond, a community with a low non-Hispanic White population has an inclusionary zoning ordinance and a provision providing for housing impact fees.284 Thus, local differences in affordable housing policies may play a role in preventing low income people from moving into high opportunity neighborhoods. While there has been some development of affordable housing, this development has been piecemeal and does not represent a county-wide commitment to building affordable housing in high opportunity neighborhoods. For example, Walnut Creek, a high opportunity area with a majority non-Hispanic White population has an inclusionary zoning ordinance and a provision for housing impact fees.285 Recently, Walnut Creek opened applications for a 58 unit complex intended for families between 20 percent and 60 percent of area median income. The complex is close to the Walnut Creek BART station and will have social services support for residents.286 However, 58 units is a small step in meeting the County’s large demand for affordable units. An important aspect of this is the challenge of financing affordable housing in relatively expensive, high opportunity areas, in the absence of funding measures (such as a bond measure) that would provide support for this. Further, Contra Costa’s fragmented transit system leads to disparities in opportunity. For example, in east County where until recently there was a lack of accessible rail service, residents using transit must rely more on the County’s piecemeal bus system, making it more difficult for residents to reach high opportunity neighborhoods and jobs. Antioch residents have the longest average commute of any city in the Bay Area, with average transit commute times of 81.1 minutes.287 282 Metropolitan Transportation Commission. The Committee to House the Bay Area. About. https://mtc.ca.gov/our-work/plans-projects/casa-committee-house-bay-area/about 283 City of Orinda, CA. Senior Affordable Housing. https://www.cityoforinda.org/280/Senior-Affordable-Housing 284 Contra Costa County Grand Jury (2015-2016). Where Will We Live? The Affordable Housing Waiting List is Closed. http://www.cc- courts.org/civil/docs/grandjury/1614%20Affordable%20Housing%20Final%2006_14_16.pdf 285 Id. 286 J. Littman (2018). Affordable Housing Complex in Walnut Creek Nears Completion. Bisnow. https://www.bisnow.com/san-francisco/news/affordable-housing/affordable-housing-complex-in-walnut- creek-nears-completion-86863 287 A. Martichoux (2018). Think you have it bad? Here’s where commuting is worst in the Bay Area. SFGate. https://www.sfgate.com/local/article/longest-shortest-drives-traffic-san-francisco-sf-12955710.php#photo- 15080855 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 126 of ? Location of proficient schools and school assignment policies Contra Costa County is divided into 18 school districts of widely varying quality. Generally, school districts in central County have better performance than school districts in east County or west County which tend to have many more students of color and students from lower-income households. School district boundaries in Contra Costa County are loosely based on existing community borders and many of the most proficient school districts are located in wealthier areas with relatively little multifamily or affordable housing. However, school districts are not completely coterminous with municipal boundaries, which creates additional challenges in connecting housing and school policymakers. In central County, housing located in some of the most proficient school districts—including Acalenes Union High School District, Lafayette Elementary School District, San Ramon Valley Unified School District, and Walnut Creek School District—command large price premiums over housing in Contra Costa County as a whole.288 As a result, lower-income students may be effectively priced out of access to the most proficient schools in the County, unless steps are taken to dramatically increase affordable housing levels in the highest performing school districts. Other contributing factors affecting unequal access to high performing schools are discussed in more detail in the publicly-supported housing section. This includes the siting of government assisted housing in areas with high poverty, low performing schools. Specifically, most of the County’s publicly supported housing is clustered in areas that rank lower than average on the school proficiency index, particularly in the west and the northeast where public housing and other multifamily housing is more heavily concentrated. In central Contra Costa, publicly supported housing is also generally located in areas that rank low on the school proficiency index, although school proficiency increases in relation to publicly supported housing as one moves further south in the jurisdiction. Additionally, in many parts of the County, Housing Choice Voucher program administration tends to concentrate low income families with children in school districts and zones with higher poverty, low performing schools. Location of employers The location of employers significantly affects access to opportunity for County residents. Jobs are not spread evenly across the County. Within Contra Costa, nearly two-thirds of jobs are located in central County but significant job growth is anticipated along with population increases in Hercules and Oakley.289 Contra Costa contains many bedroom communities for other Bay Area counties. Indeed, Contra Costa County has the highest percentage of residents who commute outside of their 288 https://research.realtor.com/housing-insights-in-top-rated-school- districts/?cid=prt_patch_editorial_web_move 289 Contra Costa County Housing Element (2014). http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/documentcenter/view/30916 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 127 of ? County for work in the Bay Area.290 According to the 2015 American Community Survey, 42.3 percent of Contra Costa residents commute to jobs outside of the County.291 Many residents commute to San Francisco, Alameda County, San Mateo County, and Santa Clara County. This jobs-housing imbalance contributes to lengthy commutes. Census data reveal that Contra Costa residents face an average commute of 35.3 minutes, longer than the average Bay Area commute of 31 minutes. One in four County residents travel 60 minutes or more to get to work, while 8.4 percent have a 90+ minute commute.292 Many east County residents who have moved to the area in search of affordable housing face long commutes to job centers, as east County has relatively few jobs despite large population growth.293 As of 2015, Pinole, Clayton, Hercules, Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley, and Pittsburg have some of the longest overall commutes in the Bay Area.294 Residents of Antioch have the longest overall commute, longest transit commute time, and longest drive alone commute time of any city in the Bay Area.295 Low-wage workers may also be willing to commute longer distances to access jobs in neighboring cities such as Oakland and Emeryville that have higher minimum wage rates than their own communities. Jurisdictions in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties have not coordinated their minimum wage increases and pay differences between jurisdictions can exceed $1 per hour.296 Regionally, approximately 35 percent of all jobs within the San Francisco Metropolitan Area are accessible within 90 minutes via transit.297 Although this ranks highly among major U.S. metropolitan areas, many jobs remain out of reach for Contra Costa residents who depend on public transportation. 290 Vital Signs (2015). Where are Bay Area workers commuting from? http://www.vitalsigns.mtc.ca.gov/commute-patterns 291 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates: Commuting Characteristics by Sex – Contra Costa County. U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: American Factfinder (Census Bureau), http://factfinder.census.gov/; Accessed: 10/16/17. 292 Id; Vital Signs (2018). How long is it taking us to travel to work? http://www.vitalsigns.mtc.ca.gov/commute- time 293 J. Palomino (2016). As Bay Area poverty shifts from cities to suburbia, services lag. San Francisco Chronicle. http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/As-poverty-spreads-to-new-Bay-Area-suburbs-6730818.php; A. Glantz (2011). A One-Time Industrial Hub With Few Prospects. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/16/us/bay-point-a-one-time-industrial-hub-has-few-job-prospects.html 294 Vital Signs 2015; A. Martichoux (2018). Think you have it bad? Here’s where commuing is worst in the Bay Area. SF Gate. https://www.sfgate.com/local/article/longest-shortest-drives-traffic-san-francisco-sf- 12955710.php#photo-15646435 295 Id. 296 P. De La Hoya (2016). In search of higher wages, East Bay workers brave longer commutes. Berkeley, CA: Richmond Confidential. https://richmondconfidential.org/2016/09/20/in-search-of-higher-wages-east-bay- workers-brave-longer-commutes/ 297 Alan Berube et al., Missed Opportunity: Transit and Jobs in Metropolitan America, available at: https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/0512_jobs_transit.pdf 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 128 of ? Location of environmental health hazards The location of environmental health hazards is a significant contributing factor to disparities in access to opportunity. Contra Costa is the most industrialized county in the Bay Area and has many oil refineries, chemical plants, power plants (including newer natural gas plants as well as older plants), and other industrial sites that may affect health. Environmental hazards that pose risks to health and safety are concentrated in west County and east County. For instance, power plants have clustered in east County since 1996.298 West County is the site of major facilities such as the Phillips 66 oil refinery, which releases the most toxic chemicals of any facility in Contra Costa.299 Source of income discrimination Source of income discrimination is discussed in detail in the Segregation section, and is also a contributing factor to disparities in access to opportunity. Voucher holders that remain in high-poverty neighborhoods are likely to have less access to jobs and transportation. Their children are more likely to attend poorly performing schools. They are also more likely to suffer from poor health outcomes. This problem is especially prevalent for women and children. According to a 2016 study, only 13 percent of female-headed households are able to use vouchers to move to high opportunity areas.300 4.5 Disproportionate Housing Needs This section provides an analysis of the ways in which housing safety, quality, and cost burden impact different groups throughout the County, and how these issues vary among groups and locations. These problems can potentially present fair housing issues when experienced disproportionately by different groups or in areas of segregation. The following analysis addresses several housing problems, including housing cost burden, overcrowding, and substandard housing (lacking plumbing or kitchen facilities), and also includes information on other problems of local importance, including displacement, rising cost pressures, and homelessness. HUD-provided information on housing cost burden, overcrowding, and substandard housing is from the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) dataset which is based on data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. Cost 298 H. Dreier, P. Burgarino (2011). East Contra Costa cities welcome power plants in their backyard. Oakland, CA: East Bay Times. https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2011/03/20/east-contra-costa-cities-welcome-power-plants- in-their-backyard/ 299 United States Environmental Protection Agency (2015). 2015 TRI Factsheet: County – Contra Costa, CA. https://iaspub.epa.gov/triexplorer/tri_factsheet.factsheet?pstate=CA&pcounty=contra%2 0costa&pYear=2015& pParent=NAT 300 Laura Sullivan & Meg Anderson, Section 8 Vouchers Help the Poor – But Only If Housing Is Available, NPR (May 10, 2017), https://www.npr.org/2017/05/10/527660512/section-8-vouchers-help-the-poor-but-only-if- housing-is-available. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 129 of ? burden and overcrowding are by far the most common housing problems that Contra Costa households experience. The analysis reveals that there are significant disparities in housing needs by race/ethnicity in Contra Costa County and in the region. Note: All tables and maps are included for reference in the technical appendix at the end of the document. Groups with Higher Rates of Housing Problems & Cost Burden Region and Contra Costa County Housing Problems In the broader region, defined as the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward metropolitan area, 44.38 percent of all households experience any of the four housing problems. As in Contra Costa County, Hispanic residents in the metropolitan area have the highest rate of housing problems. Black households experience the second highest rate of problems, followed by Native American households. Asian or Pacific Islander households have a rate of housing problems that is nearly the same as for all households. Non-Hispanic White households have the lowest rate of housing problems among all racial or ethnic groups. Hispanic households also have the highest rate of severe housing problems followed by Black Households, Native American households, Asian households, and Non-Hispanic White households. The rate of housing problems and severe housing problems experienced by each of these groups is higher in the region as a whole than in Contra Costa County. Among all households, 43.90 percent of Contra Costa households experience any of four housing problems: 1) incomplete kitchen facilities; 2) incomplete plumbing facilities; 3) overcrowding – more than one person per room; and 4) household is cost burdened – monthly housing costs exceeding 30 percent of monthly income. Table 1 shows that Hispanic households suffer the highest rates of housing problems in Contra Costa County compared to other racial and ethnic groups. In the County, 57.58 percent of Hispanic households experience at least one of the four housing problems. A slightly lower share of Black households (56.36 percent) in Contra Costa experience at least one of the four housing problems. Asian Americans or Pacific Islanders experience approximately the same rates of housing problems as households as a whole, with 42.14 percent of Asian households experiencing a problem. Non-Hispanic Whites have a lower rate of housing problems than every racial/ethnic group in Contra Costa. Overall, 22.62 percent of households in Contra Costa County experience any one of four severe housing problems (defined as 1) incomplete kitchen facilities; 2) incomplete plumbing facilities; 3) overcrowding - more than one persons per room; and 4) severe cost burden - monthly housing costs exceeding than 50 percent of monthly income). Hispanic households experience the highest rate (35.28 percent) of severe housing problems. Blacks experience a 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 130 of ? slightly smaller rate (30.53 percent) of severe housing problems. Asian Americans experience approximately the same rate of severe housing problems as the overall population. Non- Hispanic Whites are the least likely to have severe housing problems. There are significant disparities between the rates of housing problems that larger families (households of five or more people) experience and the rates of housing problems that families of five or fewer people experience. Both small and large families in Contra Costa experience lower rates of housing problems than families in the region overall. In the County, 59.04 percent of large families experience any one of the four defined housing problems, compared to 62.57 percent in the region. In contrast, 38.51 percent of smaller family households experience housing problems in the County while 38.67 percent of smaller family households in the region have problems. Non-family households in Contra Costa and the region experience housing problems at a higher rate than smaller family households, but at a lower rate than larger family households. Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg all have higher percentages of large, small and nonfamily households with problems than the Consortium and region. Severe Housing Cost Burden Table 2 shows the number of people by race and ethnicity who have a severe cost burden. Severe rent cost burden is defined as paying more than 50 percent of one's income on rent. In the region as a whole, Black households experience the highest rates of severe cost burden followed by Hispanic Households. Asian households have the second-lowest rate of severe cost burden and Non-Hispanic White households experience the lowest rate of severe cost burden. Black households experience the highest rate of severe housing cost burden in Contra Costa with approximately 28 percent of households having a burden. Hispanic households have the second highest rate of housing cost burden, followed by Native Americans and Whites. Asian or Pacific Islander households have the lowest rate of severe cost burden with slightly more than 15 percent of households being cost burdened. Since Black households experience the highest rate of severe cost burden but have a lower rate of overall housing problems as compared to Hispanic households, Hispanic households are disproportionately likely to experience overcrowding. Antioch Housing Problems More than half of all households in Antioch experience any of the four defined housing problems, with 51.08 percent of households in the city facing housing problems (see table 3). Blacks, Hispanics, and Native Americans have substantially higher rates of housing problems compared to the overall population. Black households have the highest rate of housing problems in Antioch (63.18 percent) followed by Hispanic households (61.17 percent), and Native American households (58.48 percent). Approximately half (47.57 percent) of Asian 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 131 of ? American and Pacific Islander households experience any of the four housing problems while 39.97 percent of non-Hispanic White households have housing problems. As in the County, large families in Antioch have a higher rate of housing problems (62.95 percent) of problems compared to smaller families. A total of 26.80 percent of all households in Antioch experience any of the four severe housing problems. Hispanic households experience the highest rate (34.79 percent) of severe housing problems while Black households have a slightly lower rate (32.97 percent) of severe housing problems. About one-fourth of Asian American households (25.48 percent) experience severe housing problems followed by non-Hispanic Whites (19.23 percent). Native American households have the lowest rate of severe housing problems (14.04 percent) in Antioch. Severe Housing Cost Burden In Antioch, 22.16 percent of all households are severely cost burdened (see table 4). Black households have the highest rate of severe cost burden (30.37 percent) followed by Hispanic households (26.98 percent). Asian Americans experience approximately the same rate of severe cost burden as all households with 21.72 percent of Asian households being severely cost burdened. Non-Hispanic White households have the lowest rate (15.53 percent) of severe cost burden. Concord Housing Problems Concord has a higher rate of households facing housing problems than the County Consortium with 45.42 percent of all households experiencing any of the defined housing problems (see table 5). Hispanic households experience the highest rate of housing problems (61.80 percent) followed by Black households (55.43 percent). Asian American and Pacific Islander households have a slightly lower rate of housing problems (43.70 percent) compared to all households followed by non-Hispanic Whites. Native Americans households have the lowest rate of housing problems. Large family households have a much higher rate of housing problems compared to smaller families. In terms of severe housing problems, nearly a quarter (24.45 percent) of all households in Concord experience such problems. Hispanic households have the highest rate of severe housing problems followed by Black households, Asian households, non-Hispanic White households, and Native American households. Severe Housing Cost Burden Nearly one-fifth of all households in Concord experience severe housing cost burden (see table 6). Hispanic and Black households are the most likely to have severe housing cost burden. Non-Hispanic White households experience the next most housing cost burden. Asian 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 132 of ? American households are the next most likely to have housing cost burden while Native Americans are the least likely to experience severe housing cost burden. Pittsburg Housing Problems More than half (51.86 percent) of Pittsburg households experience at least one of the four housing problems (see table 7). This is the highest rate compared to the County and the other three CDBG entitlement cities. Native American households make up a very small share of households in Pittsburg and 100 percent of them experience any of the four housing problems. Hispanic households are the next most likely to experience at least one of the four housing problems (60.80 percent) followed by Black households (54.74 percent). About 44 percent of Asian households experience at least one of the four housing problems while non- Hispanic Whites the least likely (41.67 percent) to experience a housing problem. Nearly 64 percent of large family households experience any of the four housing problems compared to about 46 percent of households with fewer than five people. About 29 percent of all households experience at least one of the four severe housing problems. Hispanic households are the most likely to experience severe housing problems (39.23 percent) followed by Black households (26.48 percent). Asian Americans are the next most likely (22.74 percent) to experience severe housing problems followed by non-Hispanic White households (20.41). Native American households are the least likely to have severe housing problems with about 19 percent of such households experiencing any of the four severe housing problems. Severe Housing Cost Burden A total of 22 percent of households in Pittsburg are severely cost burdened. Hispanic households have the highest rate of severe cost burden of any ethnic or racial group closely followed by Black households. About 20 percent of Native American households and nearly 19 percent of non-Hispanic White households are severely cost burdened. Asian American households experience the least severe housing cost burden of any racial or ethnic group in Pittsburg at about 15 percent. Large family households are slightly more likely to be severely cost burdened than smaller family households. Walnut Creek Housing Problems Approximately 39 percent of all households in Walnut Creek experience at least one of the four housing problems. Hispanic households experience the highest rate of any of the four housing problems at 52.97 percent followed by Black households at 49.37 percent. Non- Hispanic White households have a significantly lower rate of housing problems with 38.67 percent experiencing any of the four housing problems. Asian American (30.24 percent) and 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 133 of ? Native American households (29.76 percent) experience the lowest rates of housing problems. The difference in the rates of large family households and smaller family households that experience housing problems is relatively small. About 37 percent of large family households experience any of the four housing problems while about 32 percent of smaller family households experience any of the four the four housing problems. Almost one- fifth (19.83 percent) of all households in Walnut Creek experience any of the four severe housing problems. Black households are the most likely to have any of the severe housing problems followed by Native American and Hispanic households. Non-Hispanic White households experience severe housing problems at about the same rate as the overall population while Asian households are the least likely to experience any of the four severe housing problems. Severe Housing Cost Burden Overall, 17.47 percent of households in Walnut Creek experience severe housing cost burden. There are significant disparities in severe cost burden by race and ethnicity. Black households are more than twice as likely as the overall population (35.44 percent) to be severely cost burdened. Native American households are the next most likely to be severely cost burdened followed by Hispanic and non-Hispanic White households. Asian American households are the least likely to be cost burdened. Large family households are slightly more likely to be severely cost burdened than smaller family households but both experience less severe cost burden than the overall population. Almost a quarter of non-family households are severely cost burdened. Areas of Greatest Housing Burdens Region In the broader San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward metropolitan area, there are many R/ECAPs with high housing problems in San Francisco in the neighborhoods immediately north of Market Street such as the Tenderloin (see map 4). There are also high housing burdens in much of Berkeley and Oakland that align with R/ECAPs or have very high shares of people of color. Other portions of western Alameda County near Hayward and Union City also have relatively high burdens. On the Peninsula, portions of Northern San Mateo County such as Daly City have high rates of housing problems, as do East Palo Alto and Redwood City. In the North Bay, there is high housing burden in Bolinas, Marin City, and San Rafael in Marin County. Solano County, Napa County, and Sonoma Counties fall outside the boundaries of the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Metropolitan Area but are very close to Contra Costa County. In Solano County, Fairfield, Santa Rosa, and Vallejo have relatively high rates of housing burden. Parts of the City of Napa and Santa Rosa also experience high rates of housing problems. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 134 of ? Contra Costa County Households with housing burdens (experiencing one or more housing problems) are greatest in portions of Richmond, North Richmond, San Pablo, Hercules, Concord, Martinez, Pittsburg, Antioch, and Oakley (see map 3). At least 60 percent of households in parts of these communities are experiencing at least one of the four housing problems. In North Richmond, census tracts with the highest rate of housing problems are predominantly Black and Hispanic. The largest national origin groups in these census tracts are individuals from Mexico, El Salvador, the Philippines, India, and China. The Richmond census tracts experiencing the most housing problems are also predominantly Hispanic and Black and have small numbers of non-Hispanic Whites. The top national origin groups in these tracts are individuals from Mexico and El Salvador. Asian Americans make up about half the population (47.47 percent) in the Hercules census tract with the highest rate of housing burdens while there are much smaller shares of non-Hispanic Whites, Blacks, and Hispanic households. Residents from the Philippines are the predominant national origin group in the census tract. In east County, census tracts in Pittsburg with the most housing problems are majority Hispanic, with much smaller percentages of Asian Americans or Pacific islanders, Non- Hispanic Whites, and Blacks. Individuals from Mexico comprise the largest national-origin group in these parts of Pittsburg. Census tracts in Antioch that experience the greatest housing burdens are predominantly Black and Hispanic. There are also areas with high housing burdens southwest of Brentwood. The one R/ECAP identified by HUD in the County is located in Concord along the Monument Boulevard corridor. This area has one of the highest rates of housing burden in the County. Within the R/ECAP, 69.11 percent of total households experience any one of the four main housing problems. The R/ECAP is also overwhelmingly Hispanic and the top nation of origin is Mexico. The R/ECAPs section of this analysis used an expanded definition of R/ECAPs to better estimate poverty in the San Francisco Bay Area and identified an additional 11 R/ECAPs in Contra Costa. These R/ECAPs also experience significant housing burdens. In Concord, more than 60 percent of households in two additional R/ECAPs experience any of the four housing problems. As in the official R/ECAP (Monument Boulevard corridor) identified through the HUD AFFH Data and Mapping tool, residents of these R/ECAPs are predominantly Hispanic. In North Richmond, 63.18 percent of households in the R/ECAP experience any of the four housing problems while 67.8 percent of households in a R/ECAP identified in Antioch experience housing problems. A majority of residents in the North Richmond R/ECAP are Hispanic. Hispanic and Black households are a roughly equal share of the population in the Antioch R/ECAP. More than 50 percent of households experience housing burdens in R/ECAPs identified in San Pablo, Richmond, Bay Point, and Pittsburg. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 135 of ? Availability of Family Units in Publicly Supported Housing Stock HUD-provided data show the number of family-sized units available in publicly supported housing programs and the number of families with children who are housed by these programs (see table 11). In Contra Costa County, households with children make up approximately 32 percent of public housing residents, nearly 36 percent of Project-Based Section 8 residents, and about 42 percent of residents in the HCV program. Less than one percent of households in other publicly supported multifamily housing have children, reflecting the fact that the type of housing in this category (such as Section 202 housing for the elderly and Section 811 housing for persons with disabilities) is far less likely to accommodate residents with children. Nearly half (47.13 percent) of all Project-Based Section 8 units in the Consortium have 0-1 bedrooms while nearly all (95.04 percent) of other multifamily units are 0-1 bedrooms. The HCV program has the greatest number of units that can support families, with 38.22 percent of households using the HCV program living in a unit that has three or more bedrooms and 35.49 percent of households occupying 2-bedroom units. The HCV program has by far the greatest number of multi-bedroom units of any publicly supported program. For traditional public housing units, approximately 67 percent of households live in units with two or fewer bedrooms. In Antioch, households with children make up higher shares of both Project-Based Section 8 and the HCV program than in the County. In Pittsburg, households with children comprise larger percentages of public housing and HCV units than in Contra Costa County overall. In both Antioch and Pittsburg, the shares of multi-family units for those respective types of publicly supported housing appear large enough to accommodate households with children. There is relatively little publicly supported housing in Walnut Creek in a variety of unit sizes. There is not a substantial mismatch between existing publicly supported housing stock and the number of family households currently housed by public housing programs. However, the data indicate that there remains a substantial need for affordable housing units for families. The existing publicly supported housing stock is not fully able to meet the needs of family households in Contra Costa County. More than 110,000 family households are experiencing any of the four housing problems in Contra Costa County. There are more than 35,000 households experiencing severe housing cost burden in the jurisdiction while there are slightly fewer than 9,000 publicly supported housing units that have two or more bedrooms. Renter & Owner-Occupied Housing Differences by Race/Ethnicity There are significant disparities in the rates of renter and owner occupied housing by race/ethnicity in Contra Costa County (see table 12). Whites make up well over half (63.55 percent) of all homeowners in Contra Costa County. By contrast, only about six percent of homeowners in Contra Costa County are Black, while just over 13 percent of homeowners are Hispanic, and under 15 percent are Asian. Blacks and Hispanics make up a much larger share 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 136 of ? of renters than of homeowners in the County, with 15.25 percent of renters being Black and 25.33 percent being Hispanic. Non-Hispanic Whites are a significantly smaller portion of renters (43.63 percent) than they are of homeowners in the County. Asian American are also a significantly smaller share of renters in the County (11.80 percent) than they are of homeowners. In Antioch, Blacks and Hispanics make up a larger share of homeowners than in the County or region, although Whites still comprise by far the largest percentage. In addition, Blacks and Hispanics also make up about 58 percent of all renters in Antioch, a much higher share than in the Consortium or region. Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders make up a significantly larger share of homeowners (11.78 percent) than of renters (7.36 percent). Hispanics and Blacks make up a higher share of homeowners in Pittsburg than in the other three CDBG entitlement cities, Contra Costa County, and the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward metropolitan area overall. Nearly 30 percent of homeowners in Pittsburg are Hispanic while 16.86 percent of homeowners are Black. These rates are much higher than in the Consortium and the region. Pittsburg also has a higher rate of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders who are homeowners (18.04 percent) than the other entitlement jurisdictions and the Consortium, while Whites make up 32.23 percent of homeowners. Hispanics make up the largest share of renters (37.76 percent), while Whites and Blacks each make up roughly the same share of renters (23.25 percent and 25 percent respectively). The share of renters who are Hispanic is the largest among the entitlement jurisdictions and is also higher than in the County and the region. Asian Americans make up a smaller share of renters (10.02 percent) than homeowners. Homeowners in Concord are predominantly White – over 70 percent of homeowners in this jurisdiction are non-Hispanic Whites. Less than two percent of Concord homeowners are Black, 11.28 percent are Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, and about 14 percent of homeowners are Hispanic. In stark contrast, people of color make up a majority of the renters in Concord while about 45 percent of renters are White. Nearly one-third (32.60 percent) of renters are Hispanic, while 6.66 percent are Black and 11.88 percent are Asian or Pacific Islander. The disparity between the shares of homeowners who are Black or Hispanic and the shares of renters who are Black or Hispanic is quite large. In Walnut Creek, overwhelming majorities of both renters and homeowners are White, likely due to the smaller numbers of nonwhites in the jurisdiction. Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders comprise an almost identical share of homeowners (11.5 percent) and of renters (11.47 percent). Less than one percent of homeowners in Walnut Creek are Black, while only 4.81 percent of homeowners are Hispanic. Larger percentages of Blacks and Hispanics are renters in Walnut Creek, with 2.68 percent of renters being Black and 11.52 percent of renters being Hispanic. Regionally, Whites are also a majority of homeowners (58.19 percent), while Asians are a larger share of homeowners (22.73 percent) than in Contra Costa. Blacks and Hispanics make 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 137 of ? up a similar share of homeowners in the region as in Contra Costa County. Among renters in the region, 44.07 percent are White, 12.60 percent are Black, 19.83 percent are Hispanic, and 19.66 percent are Asian or Pacific Islander. The share of renters who are White are almost identical in both Contra Costa and the region. Asians and Pacific Islanders are a significantly larger share of renters in the region than in the County, while Hispanics and Blacks make up a larger share of renters in Contra Costa than in the region overall. Additional Information About Disproportionate Housing Needs Rising Housing Costs and Re-Segregation in Contra Costa County, a September 2018 report by the University of California, Berkeley’s Urban Displacement Project, which conducts research on displacement and gentrification, and the California Housing Partnership, found that Contra Costa County experienced large increases in housing costs between 2000 and 2015 and that these costs correlated with shifts in where low-income people of color live.301 The report found that Contra Costa experienced a 55 percent increase in low-income households of color between 2000 and 2015. The report found that rents increased across Contra Costa County between 2000 and 2015 with increases of 30 percent or more in parts of Brentwood, Concord, Richmond, Pittsburg, and Hercules. Communities of color were particularly vulnerable to the impact of rent increases while there was no significant relationship between rent increases and the loss of low-income White households. The report also found that rent burden increased the most for low-and very low-income households. Over 70 percent of the lowest income renters spent more than half of their income on rent in 2015. The average Black and Hispanic household had higher rent burdens in 2015 compared to White and Asian households due the fact that Blacks and Hispanics are overrepresented in lower income categories. The Haas Institute conducted an analysis of data on housing in Richmond and found that low- income renters, and Black and Hispanic residents face disproportionate housing needs.302 The foreclosure crisis contributed to a substantial decrease in the number of Richmond households who own their home between 2005 and 2015, declining from 61 percent in 2005 to 49 percent in 2015. A majority of Black (60 percent) and Hispanic (63 percent) households in Richmond are renters while only 36 percent of White households and 29 percent of Asian households are renters. For renters, cost burden has also increased with 46 percent of renters being cost burdened in 2015 compared to 34 percent in 2000. Crowding in renter- occupied homes also increased in Richmond between 2005 and 2015. Displacement Displacement is a major concern in Contra Costa County and the Bay Area. The Bay Area has been facing a major affordable housing crisis for years due to factors including insufficient 301 http://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/images/cc_final.pdf 302 By the Numbers: Housing Needs, https://haasinstitute.berkeley.edu/belongingrichmond-bynumbers 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 138 of ? housing production, especially in predominantly non-Hispanic White high-opportunity areas, and a strong regional economy boosted by the growth of the technology industry. Rising housing prices have contributed to the displacement of many low-income residents in the Bay Area, particularly from Oakland303 and San Francisco and communities near these cities such as Richmond, where housing prices rose from an average of $199,000 in 2010 to $362,000 in 2015.304 There are also areas of displacement concentrated around BART stations from Hayward to Richmond that offer easy access to transit.305 Proximity to transit is an increasingly large factor in displacement. For example, the Monument Boulevard Corridor in Concord near the Concord BART station is relatively affordable but is experiencing soaring rents due to its location. Consequently, its largely working-class Latino residents may be vulnerable to displacement.306 Generally, low-income renters, people of color, and residents without college degrees are especially vulnerable to ongoing displacement pressures. Immigrant renters, especially undocumented immigrant renters, also face higher risk as do renters with high rent burden.307 Despite increasing housing prices, much of Contra Costa remains relatively affordable compared to the rest of the Bay Area.308 As a result, Contra Costa has gained many residents from surrounding Bay Area counties. In particular, many individuals have moved to the Eastern portions of Contra Costa County where housing prices are generally lower. Between 2000 and 2015, the increase in low-income people of color in Contra Costa was concentrated in east County in cities such as Antioch, Pittsburg, and Bay Point.309 In 2015, the Urban Displacement Project (UDP) concluded that 48 percent of Bay Area neighborhoods are experiencing displacement due to physical and economic conditions.310 One key theme of the study is that displacement is a regional phenomenon linked to the broader economic pressures of housing costs and job markets. The UDP has also published maps that indicate the extent of displacement and gentrification in Contra Costa County.311 Western Contra Costa has experienced the most displacement and gentrification. Most areas of Richmond and El Cerrito are undergoing displacement or have already gentrified. Parts of Antioch, Brentwood, Concord, Hercules, Martinez, Moraga, Pinole, and Walnut Creek were also identified as undergoing displacement. Census tracts in unincorporated parts of the County including North Richmond, Contra Costa Centre, Alamo, and Crockett were also categorized as undergoing displacement or experiencing gentrification. Parts of Moraga and 303 https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2016/03/02/an-oakland-diaspora-what-drives-longtime-residents-to-leave/ 304 Association of Bay Area Governments, Addressing Displacement in the Bay Area, available at https://abag.ca.gov/files/ABAGDisplacementWhitePaper.pdf 305 Association of Bay Area Governments, Addressing Displacement in the Bay Area, available at https://abag.ca.gov/files/ABAGDisplacementWhitePaper.pdf 306 http://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/concord_final.pdf 307 http://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/images/cc_final.pdf 308 http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/07/21/bay-area-rents-still-rising-but-starting-to-level-off/ 309 http://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/images/cc_final9_18.pdf 310 http://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/images/urban_displacement_project_- _executive_summary.pdf 311 http://www.urbandisplacement.org/map/sf 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 139 of ? Walnut Creek were classified as census tracts with advanced exclusion, indicating that these areas have a very low proportion of low income households and little in-migration of low- income households. Homelessness Contra Costa Health Services’ Division of Health, Housing and Homeless Services released a report in May 2018 based on their annual point-in-time count to document people experiencing homelessness. The 2018 Point in Time Count showed that 2,234 people were counted as persons experiencing homelessness, and 1,537 of them were unsheltered. Compared to the 2017 Point in Time Count, there was a 39 percent increase in individuals identified, a 68 percent increase in the number of chronically homeless individuals, and an 88 percent increase in the number of homeless seniors age 62 or older. More than 75 percent of homeless individuals identified have been residents of Contra Costa County for more than one year, with 50 percent residing in Contra Costa for 20 or more years. In addition, the 2018 Point in Time Count found that 65 percent of homeless persons reported a disability. Antioch had the greatest number of homeless individuals in the County followed by Richmond and Concord.312 The report found significant variation in where unsheltered people are sleeping across Contra Costa County as 45 percent of homeless individuals sleeping outside were in east County while 34 percent were in central County and 21 percent were in west County.313 According to the Contra Costa County Homeless Continuum of Care’s 2016-2017 Fiscal Year Annual Report, 44 percent of those that are homeless are Black, 38 percent are White, 17 percent are Latino/Hispanic and nine percent are American Indian.314 Causes The increase in the homeless population in Contra Costa County reflects similar growth in homeless populations across the Bay Area. Rising rents and a scarcity of affordable housing contribute to homelessness.315 A report by the 2016-2017 Contra Costa Grand Jury concluded that cities within Contra Costa have not adequately promoted shelter and permanent housing for homeless individuals in their communities although it did recognize that the cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek are the only cities in Contra Costa that have an approved written plan to end or reduce homelessness in their jurisdictions.316 312 https://cchealth.org/h3/coc/pdf/PIT-report-2018.pdf 313 Id. 314 https://insight.livestories.com/s/v2/2016-2017-annual-report/bc4f18b1-7419-496e-a6d5-8adb18753f44/ 315 https://cchealth.org/h3/coc/pdf/PIT-report-2018.pdf 316 http://www.cc-courts.org/civil/docs/grandjury/Report_1707_Homelessness_in_the_Cities.pdf 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 140 of ? The 2018 point-in-time count also reflected a substantial increase in the proportion of homeless individuals sleeping east County compared to the 2017 point-in-time count.317 East Contra Costa is lacking in services relative to the other regions of Contra Costa and the development of homeless services has been slow. East County has only a few shelters; one in Antioch which has only 20 beds available only for the mentally ill, and two others in Brentwood and Bay Point which are limited to women and children. Homelessness in Contra Costa has been even more problematic since the housing crisis, which affected east Contra Costa particularly hard, and the situation is exacerbated by Contra Costa’s increasingly expensive housing market.318 . In early 2017, Contra Costa Health, Housing, and Homeless Services and the Contra Costa Council on Homelessness launched Coordinated Entry, a new initiative to streamline service delivery and enhance collaboration among the County's network of nonprofit, faith-based and government providers of homeless services.319 The Continuum of Care13 The Continuum of Care serves thousands of homeless and formerly homeless people of all ages and demographics through many service providers delivering homeless prevention and intervention programs. Emergency shelters provide temporary shelter for people that have no safe and healthy sleeping arrangements. Consumers generally come from uninhabitable locations (encampments, streets, or vehicles), are fleeing domestic violence, or have lost temporary housing. Support Services programs include a variety of services to assist homeless individuals get back on their feet and/or simply provide basic health needs. This programming includes Drop-in Centers and Employment Programs. Transitional Housing is short-term housing for underage youth and families to get them off the streets and into more stable living environments until permanent housing can be established. Homelessness prevention and Rapid Rehousing programs provide financial assistance and services to prevent individuals and families from becoming homeless and help those who are experiencing homelessness to be quickly re-housed and stabilized. Permanent Supportive Housing links long-term, safe, affordable, community-based housing with flexible, voluntary support services designed to help the individual or family stay housed and live a more productive life in the community. Street Outreach provides basic hygiene supplies, housing and shelter referrals, food, and water. Council on Homelessness320 Contra Costa has a Council on Homelessness appointed by the Board of Supervisors and consists of 17 seats that represent homeless or formerly homeless persons, health care, 317 https://cchealth.org/h3/coc/pdf/PIT-report-2018.pdf 318 https://www.mercurynews.com/2016/05/26/east-contra-costa-countys-homeless-population-increases- by-double-digits/ 319 https://cchealth.org/h3/coc/pdf/CES-P-and-P.pdf 320 https://cchealth.org/h3/coc/council.php 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 141 of ? education, the faith community, government, housing providers, nonprofit homeless service providers, and the Veterans Administration. The Council provides advice and input on the operations of homeless services, program operations, and program development efforts in the County, including the local process for applying and reviewing projects for funding in HUD Homeless Assistance Grant Competitions including the Continuum of Care program and the Emergency Solutions Grant program. The Council on Homelessness meets on the first Thursday of each month between 1 and 3 pm in Martinez. Services and Campaigns:  Built for Zero321 Built for Zero is a rigorous national campaign coordinated by Community Solutions to help the community end chronic and veteran homelessness by December 2017. Contra Costa County has created a By-Name List of homeless veterans and the chronically homeless in the community to help communities get a clearer picture of who needs help, how many people are being housed and how many people are entering or returning to homelessness each month.  Contra Costa Interfaith Housing Scattered Site Housing 322 In 2015, Contra Costa Interfaith Housing (CCIH) launched its new scattered-site permanent housing program to provide housing for 48 chronically homeless adults struggling with mental health and other complex issues. In addition to obtaining affordable permanent housing, residents in this program receive intensive support from a mobile service team of case managers and mental health clinicians who visit them in their homes. Case managers partner with residents to set goals specific to their unique needs including mental health, sobriety, and employment needs, and access to essentials such as food and primary health care. This supportive housing model is cost-effective and successful in preventing high cost emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and incarceration, while offering dignity and support to chronically homeless adults. This is a new housing model for CCIH which already provides permanent housing and/or supportive services at four affordable housing sites, serving more than 1,000 formerly homeless and very low-income Contra Costa residents. Contributing Factors of Disproportionate Housing Needs Availability of affordable units in a range of sizes The availability of affordable units in a range of sizes does not appear to be a significant contributing factor to disproportionate housing needs. Data indicates that overcrowding in unincorporated Contra Costa County has declined since 2000, though there are areas such as 321 https://cchealth.org/h3/coc/zero/ 322 https://ccinterfaithhousing.org/scattered-site-supportive-housing/ 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 142 of ? North Richmond where overcrowding is relatively high.323 This may be due to several factors such as a change in data collection methods or the general aging of the population.324 The City of Richmond also reported a decline in overcrowding since 2000.325 Further, only five percent of Contra Costa residents occupy rooms with more than one person. Though this rate is slightly higher than the national rate of three percent, it is lower than the California rate of eight percent.326 However, despite not exhibiting signs of overcrowding, there is a lack of affordable units for low-income residents. In 2015, only one percent of the permits issued by all jurisdictions in Contra Costa County were for housing that was affordable to low-income residents.327 Correspondingly, 93 percent of the permits issued were for housing that was affordable only to residents of above-moderate income.328 Compared to other counties in the Bay Area such as Alameda, San Mateo, and Santa Clara, jurisdictions in Contra Costa did not issue as many permits for very low-income and low-income housing in 2015.329 Another report by the Association of Bay Area Governments on Bay Area Housing Permit Activity during 2015-2017 found that collectively, jurisdictions in Contra Costa County issued housing permits to meet six percent of the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) goal for very low income housing and 13 percent of the RHNA goal for low income housing in Contra Costa over the time period.330 The report also found that there was significant variation among jurisdictions in Contra Costa County. For example, Antioch met 24 percent of its RHNA goal for very low income housing while Walnut Creek met seven percent of its goal for very low income housing and Pittsburg achieved six percent of its RHNA goal for low income housing.331 Many other communities in Contra Costa met zero percent of their RHNA goals for very low income housing.332 Finally, 56.4 percent of renters in Contra Costa pay more than 30 percent of their income in rent, and increases in rent prices have not corresponded with an increase in incomes.333 Further, the Monument Corridor, a predominantly Hispanic community in Concord, exhibits more overcrowding than other parts of the County. Research indicates that the population in Monument Corridor has risen 67 percent since 1980, to 24,000 residents.334 In contrast, the population in the city of Concord as a whole has increased only 30 percent since 1980. The 323 http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/30916 324 Id. 325 http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/31210 326 https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productvi ew.xhtml?src=bkmk 327 https://abag.ca.gov/planning/housing/datasets/RPC_April%202017_Attach2_Permit_Data%20- 040417.pdf#page=4 328 Id. 329 Id. 330 https://abag.ca.gov/planning/housing/pdfs/2015-2017PermitDataReport.pdf 331 Id. 332 Id. 333 https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/12/15/contra-costa-communities-seek-solutions-to-housing-crisis- nimbyism/ 334 https://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/concord_final.pdf,2 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 143 of ? Monument Corridor population is likely underestimated since many of the residents are undocumented immigrants who are unlikely to give information to the Census Bureau because of fear of being reported to Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The actual population is likely closer to 37,000 people.335 Though Census data indicates that overcrowding in Monument Corridor has declined, advocates and residents say that this data is misleading, as undocumented immigrants are also unlikely to report substandard housing conditions. Residents report that it is common for multiple families to live in one apartment or even in one room.336 Thus, the predominantly Hispanic community in Monument Corridor is disproportionally experiencing overcrowding. Displacement of residents due to economic pressures Displacement of residents is a contributing factor to disproportionate housing needs. East County, where many residents who were displaced from other parts of the Bay Area end up, has one of the highest rates of residents experiencing housing problems. In Antioch, 51.08 percent of residents experience either 1) incomplete kitchen facilities, 2) incomplete plumbing facilities, 3) overcrowding (more than one person per room), or 4) a housing cost burden (paying more than 30 percent of income on housing). Further, Hispanic residents of Antioch are more likely to experience these housing problems than their non-Hispanic White neighbors. This indicates that when Hispanic families are displaced from other areas of the Bay Area to east County, they are likely to experience disproportionate housing needs. Displacement of and/or lack of housing support for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking Lack of housing support for victims of domestic violence is a contributing factor to disproportionate housing needs in Contra Costa. According to a California Health Interview Survey in 2007, 103,000 adults in Contra Costa were victims of intimate partner violence. 337 This number is on par with the rates of domestic violence in the greater Bay Area and California. In 2001, Contra Costa was the first jurisdiction to pass a “Zero Tolerance for Domestic Violence” bill.338 The bill provides an ongoing stream of funding for a collaborative domestic violence program that includes emergency shelter and housing referrals for victims of domestic violence.339 Due to the success of the program, other jurisdictions have adopted its collaborative model. In 2015, Contra Costa received a $1.6 million grant for domestic violence prevention work, which allocated money for victim services. However, there are local disparities in domestic violence rates. Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Richmond had higher domestic violence rates when compared to the rest of the County.340 Antioch, which sits in the eastern part of the County, has less social service 335 https://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/concord_final.pdf, 2 336 https://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/concord_final.pdf, 4 337 https://cchealth.org/health-data/hospital-council/2010/pdf/43_domestic_violence.pdf 338 https://cchealth.org/health-data/hospital-council/2010/pdf/43_domestic_violence.pdf 339 Id. 340 https://cchealth.org/health-data/hospital-council/2010/pdf/43_domestic_violence.pdf 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 144 of ? providers and less federal funding, and may be less able to provide housing support for victims of domestic violence.341 These disparities in incidences of domestic violence also correlate with race. The communities with the lowest incidence of reported incidents of domestic violence were the predominantly White communities of Orinda and Moraga. In contrast Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Richmond all have majority non-White populations.342 Thus, these increased domestic violence rates may contribute to communities of color experiencing the disproportionate housing problems associated with domestic violence such as homelessness. Lack of Access to Opportunity due to high housing costs Lack of Access to Opportunity due to high housing costs is a contributing factor to disproportionate housing needs. When rents in high opportunity neighborhoods are too high, residents are deprived of the benefits of such neighborhoods such as transit and quality schools. Further, as high housing costs push Contra Costa residents further away from jobs and public transportation, they lose the opportunities for economic mobility that would mitigate their housing cost burdens. Studies indicate that shorter commutes are highly correlated with economic mobility, thus it is likely that lack of access for east County residents to high opportunity neighborhoods with transit and good jobs is contributing to housing cost burdens in Contra Costa.343 Lack of Private Investment Lack of private investment is a contributing factor to disproportionate housing needs. Property owners may choose to ignore the needs of tenants in order to encourage tenants to vacate and bring in new tenants who can pay higher rents.344 This type of disinvestment leads to a lack of adequate maintenance that can address habitability issues.345 Land use and zoning laws Current land use and zoning laws contribute to disproportionate housing needs. As discussed in the Segregation/Integration section of this analysis, people of color disproportionately reside in high-density housing, which can generally be built in areas zoned for multi-family housing, multiple dwellings, or single-family homes on small lots. The majority of land in Walnut Creek, Concord, and much of the unincorporated areas are zoned for single family residences. Strict planning codes and zoning in jurisdictions can also restrict the ability to add 341 https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2017/12/15/contra-costa-communities-seek-solutions-to-housing-crisis- nimbyism/ 342 https://cchealth.org/health-data/hospital-council/2010/pdf/43_domestic_violence.pdf 343 https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/07/upshot/transportation-emerges-as-crucial-to-escaping- poverty.html?login=smartlock&auth=login-smartlock 344 http://workingeastbay.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Housing-Crisis-Hits-Home-in-Concord-7- 2018.pdf 345 https://www.urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/files/concord_final.pdf 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 145 of ? more housing through multiple units. As a result, there are significant limitations on housing construction. Additionally, policies such as minimum parking requirements, height limits, and lot coverage maximums can reduce the number of units that can be built on a site and contribute to difficulties in producing more housing.346 Lending discrimination Lending discrimination is a contributing factor to disproportionate housing needs, as class groups who struggle to obtain access to loans are more likely to experience housing problems such as cost burdens, overcrowding, and substandard housing, and to be renters rather than homeowners. When banks and other financial institutions deny loan applications from people of color, they are less likely to achieve home ownership and instead must turn to the rental market. As Contra Costa’s rental housing market grows increasingly unaffordable, Blacks and Hispanics are disproportionately impacted. Table 13 lists, by race, the percentage of applications denied for various types of loans in the Oakland-Hayward-Berkeley region in 2016, based on Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data from the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.347 Blacks’ and Hispanics’ (or Latinos’) applications are uniformly denied at higher rates than those of Whites or Asians. Loss of affordable housing The loss of affordable housing is also a contributing factor to disproportionate housing needs. Rents have increased dramatically in Contra Costa County, pricing many tenants out of their homes. Since 2000, median rents in the County have increased by 25 percent, while median renters’ incomes have decreased by three percent.348 Low-income renters in Contra Costa are severely rent burdened, spending 57 percent of their paycheck on rent.349 Market-rate development has led to the loss of affordable housing in in cities such as El Cerrito and Richmond.350 In California, state law mandates that jurisdictions evaluate affordable housing stock that is at-risk of conversion to market-rate housing as part of the Housing Element of a comprehensive General Plan. Housing elements conducted by incorporated cities in Contra Costa as well as by the County government indicate that thousands of affordable units in the 346 http://www.cc- courts.org/civil/docs/grandjury/1614%20Affordable%20Housing%20Final%2006_14_16.pdf 347 https://www.ffiec.gov/hmdaadwebreport/AggTableList.aspx 348 https://1p08d91kd0c03rlxhmhtydpr-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp- content/uploads/2017/05/ContraCostaCounty2017.pdf 349 Id. 350 https://www.eastbayexpress.com/oakland/low-income-tenants-to-be-directly-displaced-by-development- in-el-cerrito/Content?oid=4402578 ; http://richmondconfidential.org/2016/09/29/richmond-residents- fighting-eviction-gentrification/ 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 146 of ? County are at-risk of conversion to market-rate housing.351 According to a 2017 California Housing Partnership study, the County also needs 30,939 more affordable housing units to meet the needs of low-income renters.352 When low-income and minority families do not have access to affordable housing, they are more likely to experience cost burden and substandard accommodations with housing problems. Source of income discrimination Source of income discrimination is a significant contributing factor to disproportionate housing needs. Although California law prohibits discrimination on the basis of other sources of income, it excludes housing assistance from these protections. Many Housing Choice Voucher holders in the Bay Area face considerable difficulty in finding a landlord willing to accept a voucher.353 For example, residents of a Richmond Housing Authority project undergoing renovation were given Housing Choice Vouchers as part of a relocation process, but reported being unable to find housing due in part to source of income discrimination.354 When tenants are able to find rentals that will accept vouchers, they may face long waiting lists.355 In areas that do offer more affordable housing, some voucher holders have been met with resistance by some longtime community members.356 In 2011, the City of Antioch settled a class-action lawsuit filed by Black Housing Choice Voucher holders who alleged that the city and its police department engaged in a targeted campaign of discrimination against voucher holders.357 Although the California Fair Employment and Housing Act bars discrimination on the basis of source of income, Housing Choice Vouchers are not considered a protected source of income.358 Statewide legislation which would have barred source of income discrimination against renters who rely on Housing Choice Vouchers failed in the State Senate in 2016.359 There is currently no countywide ordinance banning source of income discrimination, nor is there such an ordinance in any municipality in Contra Costa County. In the Bay Area, jurisdictions with ordinances banning source of income discrimination against Housing 351 http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/31210; http://www.cityofconcord.org/pdf/projects/housingElement/11072014.pdf; http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/documentcenter/view/30916 352 https://1p08d91kd0c03rlxhmhtydpr-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp- content/uploads/2017/05/ContraCostaCounty2017.pdf 353 http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/06/17/red-hot-bay-area-housing-puts-big-chill-on-section-8/ 354 http://www.mercurynews.com/2015/04/24/richmond-city-struggles-to-find-homes-for-troubled-public- housing-projects-residents/ 355 http://www.mercurynews.com/2015/03/27/walnut-creek-section-8-tenants-in-apartment-complex- squeezed-ou 356 http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/09/us/09housing.html 357 http://www.publicadvocates.org/our-work/housing-justice/williams-v-city-antioch/ 358 Sabi v. Sterling, 183 Cal. App. 4th 916 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010). 359 http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/02/07/santa-clara-county-considers-making-landlords-take-section- 8/ 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 147 of ? Choice Voucher holders include San Francisco, East Palo Alto, and Santa Clara County.360 The San Diego City Council is currently considering such an ordinance.361 Passing such an ordinance in Contra Costa and providing resources for enforcement could help reduce source of income discrimination in the County. Other ordinances, such as a reusable screening report ordinance and a “first-in-time” ordinance, would strengthen a source of income ordinance.362 The reusable screening report ordinance would ensure Housing Choice Voucher holders do not have to pay excessive fees to multiple landlords, while the “first-in-time” ordinance would require landlords to offer tenancy to the first qualified applicants who complete an application. Lack of local or regional cooperation Lack of local and regional cooperation is a contributing factor that influences housing burden. Many high opportunity areas with predominantly non-Hispanic White populations in Contra Costa have been sites of opposition to State and local affordable housing development.363 For example, Lafayette has only 15 units listed as affordable to low income residents and available to non-seniors according to the Contra Costa Housing Authority.364 In 2016, activists sued Lafayette after a developer scrapped a plan to build 315 affordable units due to pressure from the City.365 The developer replaced the plan with a plan to build forty-four single family homes. Source of income discrimination Source of income discrimination is discussed in detail in the Segregation section, and also contributes to disproportionate housing needs. When landlords in high opportunity areas refuse to accept vouchers, HCV holders may be forced to live in housing with deteriorating conditions, or may even become homeless.366 360 Id. 361 https://timesofsandiego.com/politics/2018/06/27/no-bias-against-section-8-renters-says-plan-going-to- san-diego-council/. 362 https://haasinstitute.berkeley.edu/belongingrichmond-sourceofincomediscrimination. 363 http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/article/NE/20180419/NEWS/180419655 364 https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/article/Renters-group-tries-to-force-suburbs-to-add-7386206.php 365 Id. 366 Id. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 148 of ? 4.6 Publicly Supported Housing Analysis The following section describes fair housing issues relevant to Publicly-Supported Housing (PSH) throughout Contra Costa County. This section examines patterns in the location and occupancy of various types of PSH – including Public Housing, Project-Based Rental Assistance (PBRA)367, Housing Choice Vouchers (HCV), Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) properties, and other assisted multifamily housing properties – with regard to demographics, segregation, and access to opportunity. It also assesses the role of Public Housing Authority (PHA) policies and other contributing factors to PSH-related fair housing issues, such as segregation, housing choice, and access to opportunity for PSH residents. History To put these programs in context, below is a brief history compiled by the National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC). An expanded history can be found at their website: https://nlihc.org/sites/default/files/Sec1.03_Historical-Overview_2015.pdf. Federal housing programs grew and changed based on the economic, social, cultural, and political circumstances of the times. The programs and agencies that led to the federal department now known as HUD began in the early 1930s with construction and finance programs meant to alleviate some of the housing hardships caused by the Great Depression. In 1937, the U.S. Housing Act sought to address the housing needs of low income people through public housing. The nation’s housing stock at this time was of very poor quality in many parts of the country. Inadequate housing conditions, such as the lack of hot running water or dilapidation, were commonplace for poor families. Public housing was a significant improvement for those who had access to it. However, the cost of operating public housing soon eclipsed the revenue brought in from resident rents. This reality is an ever-present challenge to any program that seeks to provide housing or other goods or services to people whose incomes are not great enough to afford the prices offered in the marketplace. After World War II, migration from urban areas to the suburbs meant declining cities. Federal programs were developed to improve urban infrastructure and to clear “blight.” This often meant wholesale destruction of neighborhoods and housing, albeit often low-quality housing, lived in by immigrants and people of color. 367 HUD’s AFFH Data Tool provides data on households on five categories of housing as listed here. However, HUD refers throughout the AFH guidebook, tools, and rule to PBRA data as “Project-Based Section 8”. For clarity of reference in this document, we are simply using the PBRA term to describe that data. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 149 of ? In 1965, Congress elevated housing to a cabinet-level agency of the federal government, creating the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). HUD began providing subsidies to public housing agencies (PHAs) that would help make up the difference between revenue from rents and the cost of adequately maintaining the housing. In January 1973, President Nixon created a moratorium on the construction of new rental and homeownership housing by the major HUD programs. The following year, the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 made significant changes to housing programs, marked by a focus on block grants and an increase in the authority granted to local jurisdictions. This act was the origin of the tenant- and project-based Section 8 rental assistance programs. Structural changes in the American economy, deinstitutionalization of persons with disabilities, and a decline in housing and other support for low-income people resulted in a dramatic increase in homelessness in the 1980s. The shock of visible homelessness spurred Congressional action, and the McKinney Act of 1987 (later renamed the McKinney-Vento Act) created new housing and social service programs within HUD specially designed to address homelessness. In the 1980s and 1990s, waves of private affordable housing owners deciding to “opt out” of the project-based Section 8 program occurred. Housing advocates – including PHAs, nonprofit affordable housing developers, local government officials, nonprofit advocacy organizations and low-income renters – organized to preserve this disappearing stock of affordable housing using whatever funding and financing was available to them. The Department of the Treasury’s Internal Revenue Service was given a role in affordable housing development in the Tax Reform Act of 1986 with the creation of the Low -Income Housing Tax Credit, which provides tax credits to those investing in the development of affordable rental housing. That same act codified the use of private activity bonds for housing finance, authorizing the use of such bonds for the development of housing for homeownership, as well as the development of multifamily rental housing. Public Housing Authorities Three public housing authorities operate within Contra Costa County:  The Housing Authority of Contra Costa County (HACCC), headquartered in Martinez, CA, owns approximately 1177 units of public housing in 14 developments throughout the County. The HACCC also administers approximately 7000 units under the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) and Shelter Care Plus programs, and 243 other multi-family units.  The Richmond Housing Authority (RHA), located in northwest Contra Costa County on the San Francisco Bay, has approximately 1851 Housing Choice Vouchers, and 559 units of public housing, including two public housing developments, the Nystrom Village 102-unit scattered-site development and Nevin Plaza, a 142-unit high-rise for those 60 and older and/or individuals with disabilities. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 150 of ?  The Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburg (HACP), seated in north-central Contra Costa County, manages 1118 tenant-based HCVs and has no public housing of its own. In the HACP jurisdiction, there are 176 public housing units administered by the HACCC. Demographic Analysis Population in Publicly Supported Housing Different forms of publicly-supported housing (PSH) in the Contra Costa Consortium are racially disparate. Table 1 of the Technical Appendix PSH section provides demographic information on residents living in Publicly Supported Housing in the Contra Costa Consortium and the region. The demographics are presented by race and ethnicity and categorized into four housing types, described below. Contra Costa County Public Housing Black residents comprises the largest percentage of public housing (55 percent) in the Consortium’s jurisdiction, despite comprising only nine percent368 of the Consortium’s total population. White and Hispanic populations are both underrepresented in Public Housing, as each group makes up approximately 19 percent of households residing in Public Housing while accounting for approximately 48 percent and 24 percent, respectively, of the Consortium’s total population. The smallest group in Public Housing is the Asian/Pacific Islander population, who only make up 6.2 percent of those in Public Housing, despite accounting for nearly 15 percent of the Consortium’s total population. Project-Based Rental Assistance (PBRA) Housing Black residents also make up the largest percentage (37 percent) of those residing in PBRA units, again comprising a disproportionately larger share of residents, followed by Whites (28 percent), Hispanics (21 percent), and Asians/Pacific Islanders (15 percent). While Blacks are overrepresented and Whites are underrepresented compared to their share of the overall population, Hispanics and Asian/Pacific Islanders are roughly proportionately represented in the jurisdiction’s PBRA Housing. Other Multifamily Housing White residents make up the greatest percentage (33 percent) of Other Multifamily housing, followed closely by Asians/Pacific Islanders (29 percent), Hispanics (21 percent), and Blacks 368 Demographic trends come from Table 2 of HUD’s provided data. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 151 of ? (16.52 percent). While Whites are still underrepresented, they make up the largest portion of Other Multifamily housing relative to other racial/ethnic groups. Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program The HCV Program is the most racially disproportionate, composed of approximately 62 percent Black households, followed by Whites (22 percent), Hispanics (9 percent), and Asians/Pacific Islanders (7 percent). Even still, the HCV Program is the largest of these four categories of PSH, with the majority of all racial groups using the HCV program. Race / Ethnicity Representation within PSH Categories The preceding summarizes the separate racial/ethnic distribution for each category of PSH. By contrast, the following depicts in which category of PSH an individual of a certain race/ethnicity is most likely to reside. The following analysis answers whether certain racial/ethnic groups are more likely to be residing in one program category of publicly supported housing than other program categories. Table 2 in the Technical Appendix PSH section shows the percentage of each race residing in PSH that lives in each category of PSH in the Consortium’s jurisdiction. For example, the first box shows that eight percent of Whites who live in some type of PSH live in Public Housing. As the table shows, all people who reside in some form of PSH, regardless of race, are most likely to use the HCV program. However, Blacks are disproportionately likely to use the HCV program, with 76 percent of Black PSH households using the HCV program, as compared with 63 percent, 45 percent, and 48 percent of White, Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander PSH households, respectively, who use the HCV program. After the HCV program, people of all races who live in PSH are most likely to reside in PBRA housing. However, this is particularly true for Hispanics and Asians/Pacific Islanders, 31 percent and 28 percent, respectively, of whom live in PBRA housing. In contrast, only 13 percent and 22 percent of Blacks and Whites, respectively, who live in PSH live in PBRA Housing. After PBRA housing, there is no one form of PSH in which all racial groups are most likely to live. Whites in PSH are split evenly between Other Multifamily housing and Public Housing, whereas Blacks are far more likely to live in Public Housing than Other Multifamily housing (10 percent vs. two percent). Hispanics are slightly more likely to live in Public Housing than Other Multifamily housing, with 14 percent of Hispanics in PSH living in Public Housing and 10 percent in Other Multifamily housing. Last, Asians/Pacific Islanders are far more likely to live in Other Multifamily housing than Public Housing, with 18 percent of Asians/Pacific Islanders in PSH living in Other Multifamily housing and only six percent living in Public Housing. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 152 of ? In short, people of each racial group living in PSH are most likely to use the HCV program. However, this is disproportionately true for Blacks. Though PBRA housing is the next largest program for all races, a larger percentage of Hispanics and Asians/Pacific Islanders in particular are likely to reside here. After PBRA housing, Asians/Pacific Islanders are far more likely to live in Other Multifamily housing, Blacks are far more likely to live in Public Housing, and Whites and Hispanics are relatively evenly split between the two. Antioch Public housing located in Antioch is more likely to serve White households, as is shown in Table 3. Residents participating the HCV program are disproportionately more likely to be Black. Hispanic residents are most-served by Project-Based Rental Assistance housing, while Asian American/Pacific Islander households are more likely to reside in Other Multifamily Housing. Concord Table 4 shows that in Concord, White households comprise 50 percent of households residing in PRBA housing, while Hispanic residents make up about 23 percent of households and Asian/Pacific Islander households are about 22 percent of households. Only four percent of households in PBRA housing in Concord are Black. In the HCV program, White residents make up about half (48 percent) of households. Black residents comprise 29 percent of HCV households, followed by Asian/Pacific Islanders and Hispanic residents, who make up 14 percent and eight percent of HCV households, respectively. There are very few other multifamily units in Concord; these units are more likely to serve Hispanic residents. Overall, Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic households are more likely to reside in PBRA housing, while Black households are more likely to reside in housing assisted by the HCV program. White households are about as likely to live in PBRA units as they are likely to live in housing supported by the HCV program. Pittsburg Black households account for approximately 70 percent of households participating in the HCV program in Pittsburg, as indicated in Table 5. Asian and Pacific Islander residents are disproportionately likely to live in other multifamily housing. Hispanic as well as non- Hispanic White households are more likely to reside in PBRA housing. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 153 of ? Walnut Creek In Walnut Creek, White households are more likely to live in PBRA than in other forms of publicly supported housing. Other multifamily housing is more likely to serve Asian or Pacific Islander households. Hispanic residents are more likely to live in PBRA while all Black residents in Walnut Creek who live in publicly supported housing live in housing supported by the HCV program. Region As HUD data in Table 1 reveals, the largest discrepancy between the Contra Costa Consortium and the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward region is that Asian/Pacific Islanders make up a greater share of each program for which there are data, increasing approximately 15, 24, and 18 percentage points for Public, PBRA, and Other Multifamily housing, respectively. While this increase may be expected since the Asian population is greater in the region (9 percent higher than in the jurisdiction), the significant increase does not appear to be explainable by the difference in population alone. The HUD table does not include regional data for the HCV Program; it is therefore unclear whether the Contra Costa consortia demographic breakdown of the HCV program comports with the regional breakdown. Moving from jurisdiction to region reveals changes in share of publicly-supported housing type for other races as well, albeit less starkly than for Asians/Pacific Islanders. For example, at the regional level, Blacks make up a slightly smaller share of Public Housing (46.9 percent vs. 54.93 percent at the jurisdictional level) and PBRA housing (24.37 percent vs. 36.81 percent at the jurisdictional level). Similarly, Whites make up a slightly smaller share of Other Multifamily Housing at the regional level (25.28 percent vs. 32.53 percent in the jurisdiction). Hispanics make up a smaller share of publicly supported housing across the board at the jurisdictional level, dropping approximately 4, 10, and nine points for Public, PBRA, and Other Multifamily housing, respectively. Comparison to General Population Table 1 provides data on the number of households that meet income eligibility requirements for publicly-supported housing, sorted by race and ethnicity, and categorized by Area Median Income (AMI) groupings of 0-30 percent AMI, 0-50 percent AMI, and 0-80 percent AMI. Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 154 of ? Comparison of PSH Programs Demographics to General Population Whereas Whites encompass 56.75 percent of total households in the jurisdiction, they make up a significantly smaller share of each PSH program, accounting for between 19 percent (Public Housing) and 32.53 percent (Other Multifamily) of PSH programs. In contrast, whereas Blacks comprise roughly nine percent of households in the jurisdiction, they account for a significantly larger share of PSH across the board, ranging from 16.52 percent (Other Multifamily) to 61.82 percent (HCV Program). Similarly, while Hispanics make up approximately 17 percent of total households in the jurisdiction, they are overrepresented in all but the HCV program, where they only comprise 8.46 percent of total HCV households. Last, Asians/Pacific Islanders, who make up 13.66 percent of total households, are overrepresented in Other Multifamily Housing (29.13 percent), underrepresented in Public Housing (6.2 percent) and the HCV program (7.04 percent), and are roughly proportionally represented in PBRA Housing (14.59 percent). Comparison of PSH Programs Demographics to Eligible Households Whereas Whites encompass 56.75 percent of all households at the jurisdictional level, they comprise roughly 41 percent of households eligible for some form of PSH, defined as households that fall within 0-80 percent AMI. Contrastingly, White households account for significantly less of those actually residing in a form of PSH. In contrast, while Blacks comprise roughly nine percent of total households in the jurisdiction, they account for nearly 14 percent of households eligible for some form of PSH. Relative to their p eligible households, Blacks are overrepresented across the board in PSH. Blacks comprise 16.52 percent of households in Other Multifamily housing, and make up 61.82 percent of HCV Program households. Similarly, while Hispanic families comprise 17 percent of total households in the jurisdiction, they encompass roughly 26 percent of households eligible for some form of PSH. Relative to their share of PSH-eligible households, Hispanics are underrepresented in all forms of PSH, accounting for only 8.46 percent of HCV Program households and 20.68 percent of Other Multifamily housing. Last, whereas Asians/Pacific Islanders encompass 13.66 percent of the jurisdiction’s households, they account for only roughly 11 percent of total households eligible for some form of PSH. Asians/Pacific Islanders are significantly overrepresented in PBRA Housing (14.59 percent) and Other Multifamily housing (29.13 percent), and are underrepresented in Public Housing (6.2 percent) and the HCV Program (7.04 percent). 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 155 of ? Region Demographics of PSH Programs Compared to General Demographics At the regional level, Whites make up a smaller percentage of total households than at the jurisdictional level (51.73 percent, vs. 56.75 percent). However, mirroring the jurisdiction, Whites are still significantly underrepresented in PSH at the regional level, comprising between 16.55 percent (Public Housing) and 25.35 percent (PRBA housing). Blacks comprise 8.67 percent of total households at the regional level (only slightly less than in the jurisdiction), and are overrepresented in each PSH program for which there are data, ranging from 14.4 percent (Other Multifamily) to 46.9 percent (Public Housing). Hispanics encompass a slightly smaller percentage of total households in the region (15.29 percent), and are slightly underrepresented across the board in programs for which there are data (from 11.97 percent of Other Multifamily housing to 14.75 percent of Public Housing). Last, Asians/Pacific Islanders constitute a significantly greater portion of total households at the regional level (21.33 percent), are proportionally represented in Public Housing (21.42 percent), and are overrepresented in PBRA Housing (38.56 percent) and Other Multifamily Housing (47.57 percent). Data on the HCV Program are not available at the regional level. Demographics of PSH Programs Compared to Demographics of Eligible Households Whereas Whites comprise 51.73 percent of total households in the region, they constitute only 38.15 percent of households eligible for some form of PSH. Relative to their eligibility, Whites are underrepresented across the board in PSH, especially in Public Housing, where they only account for 16.55 percent of total Public Housing households. While Blacks comprise 8.67 percent of the regional population, they account for a greater percentage (12.99 percent) of households eligible for some form of PSH. Relative to their eligibility, Blacks are overrepresented in each form of PSH, ranging from 14.4 percent in Other Multifamily housing to 46.9 percent Public Housing. Hispanics represent 21.85 percent of total households eligible for some form of PSH, six percentage points higher than their share of total households (15.29 percent). However, Hispanics are underrepresented in each form of PSH for which there is data, comprising 14.75 percent, 10.83 percent, and 11.97 percent of Public, PBRA, and Other Multifamily housing, respectively. Asians and Pacific Islanders make up a significantly larger share of total households at the regional level (21.33 percent), a percentage that is roughly proportionate to Asians’/Pacific Islanders’ share of households eligible for some form of PSH (20.66 percent). As opposed to 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 156 of ? the jurisdictional level, where Asians/Pacific Islanders are overrepresented in some forms of PSH and underrepresented in others, Asians/Pacific Islanders are overrepresented in all forms of PSH for which there are data relative to their share of those eligible for PSH at the regional level (21.42 percent of Public Housing, 38.56 percent of PBRA, and 47.57 percent of Other Multifamily housing). Publicly Supported Housing Location and Occupancy Analysis Patterns in the location of publicly supported housing in relation to segregated areas and R/ECAPs As seen on the maps referenced below, PSH units in Contra Costa are predominantly located in and around the Richmond area, between and around Concord and Walnut Creek, and in and around the Pittsburg and Antioch areas. Table 7 in the Technical Appendix PSH section shows the number of units by type of PSH in R/ECAPs and Non-R/ECAPs. There are no official HUD R/ECAPs in Pittsburg, but there are two census tracts that could be considered R/ECAPS using the revised definition (discussed at greater length in the R/ECAP section). Those two tracts, 3120 and 3131.01 have poverty levels of over 27 percent in a community where the poverty level is 17 percent and in a county where poverty averages 10 percent. Tract 3120 has all the PSH in Pittsburg and is 36 percent Black and 42 percent Hispanic. It is thus comparatively highly concentrated by poverty, race/ethnicity, and subsidized housing. These publicly supported units are not managed, owned or administered in any way by the PHA. Tract 3101.01 is significant in its levels of ethnic segregation and poverty compared to rates in Pittsburg and the County, with the tract composed of 35 percent Hispanic households and a 27 percent poverty rate. Public Housing Public Housing units are generally geographically concentrated in and around the Richmond and Pittsburg areas, where the population tends to be Black and Hispanic. This comports with the HUD-provided data, which reveals that Public Housing is disproportionately likely to comprise Black and Hispanic households. Furthermore, of the public housing developments in the Consortium, most are located in what could be called high distress neighborhoods (as explained in Map 1 in the Technical Appendix PSH section). Tables 8 through 11 in the Technical Appendix PSH section show the distribution of public housing developments by community with census tract-level race and poverty details using demographic information first from the American Community Survey (2012-2016) and then from the HUD AFFH tool and local data. Richmond data was gathered through local Resident Characteristics Reports. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 157 of ? As of September 2018, RHA had secured $160 million in funding from public and private sources to convert Nystrom Village from public housing rentals to a combination of approximately 400 homeownership, tax credit, market rate, and public housing rentals. Five original residences are slated for preservation and will be converted into nonprofit and museum space. Project-Based Rental Assistance (PBRA) PBRA Housing units are also more likely to be geographically concentrated in census tracts with predominantly Black and Hispanic residents, and are predominantly located in and around the Richmond area, between and around Concord and Walnut Creek, and to a lesser extent, around the Pittsburg and Antioch areas. A smaller selection of PBRA units in the southwest of Contra Costa are located in predominantly white areas (near Orinda and Lafayette) and are comprised of predominantly White households. See Map 3. Other Multifamily Assisted Housing Other Multifamily Assisted Developments are primarily located in White and Asian-dominant census tracts. The majority of developments can be found in more heavily White and Asian areas, such as along the water in northwest Contra Costa near Pinole and Hercules, and in central Contra Costa. See Map 4. Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program The HCV program is most prominent in western Contra Costa County, in heavily Black and Hispanic areas, and in the northeast of the County, in predominantly Black, Hispanic, and Asian areas. As the HACCC converts some public housing developments under the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) program, the Las Deltas development located in Richmond, a commitment has been made to affirmatively furthering fair housing choice outside of areas of minority concentrations, including providing referrals to housing outside of areas with minority concentrations for those Las Deltas residents that choose to take HCVs as their relocation option. See Map 5. Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) LIHTC units are geographically distributed in a relatively even manner, with units located heavily in the predominantly Black and Hispanic Richmond, Pittsburg, and Antioch areas, in the predominantly Asian areas of Pinole and Hercules, and in the predominantly White area between and around Concord and Walnut Creek. See Map 6. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 158 of ? Antioch As Map 7 shows, PSH in Antioch is concentrated north of Highway 4. There are seven LIHTC properties in Antioch north of Highway 4 as well as one other multifamily property. One public housing site is located along Buchannan Road while there is one PBRA property and one LIHTC property sited near Somersville Towne Center. In addition, there is one other multifamily property along Deer Valley Road south of Highway 4. Map 8 illustrates that most census tracts have at least 12.3 percent of households participating in the HCV program. The highest concentrations of HCV supported housing is in the far southern portion of Antioch that has roughly equal shares of Asians/Pacific Islanders, Blacks, Hispanics, and Non-Hispanic Whites. There is also a high share of HCV voucher holders in several integrated tracts in eastern Antioch as well as in one census tract that lies northeast of Somersville Towne Center that has a predominantly Black and Hispanic population. Concord Publicly supported housing in Concord is largely concentrated along Clayton Road and the Monument Corridor, as shown in Map 9. Most of the LIHTC properties in Concord are located along Monument Boulevard in the western section of Concord and are located in census tracts with a predominantly Hispanic population. Two LIHTC properties are located in the one officially defined R/ECAP in Concord. PBRA properties are mostly located along Clayton Road in relatively integrated census tracts. As Map 10 shows, there is a fairly even distribution of housing supported by the HCV program across Concord, with the greatest concentrations in census tracts that border Clayton Road and Monument Boulevard. Pittsburg Map 11 shows that PSH units in Pittsburg are largely concentrated in the central part of the City. LIHTC properties are mostly located in census tracts with a predominantly Hispanic population. PBRA properties are also located in census tracts that are largely comprised of Hispanic residents. There is one public housing property in the City located just north of Highway 4 and to the east of Pittsburg High School, located in a census tract that is overwhelmingly Black and Hispanic. As indicated in Map 12, HCV holders are concentrated in the northern part of Pittsburg, particularly near the waterfront. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 159 of ? Walnut Creek Map 13 shows that publicly supported housing in Walnut Creek is concentrated on the Western side of the city, largely paralleling I-680. LIHTC properties are located in areas that are majority non-Hispanic White and have substantial percentages of people of color as well. The one PBRA property in Walnut Creek is in an overwhelmingly non-Hispanic White area. The percentage of households in Walnut Creek that live in housing supported by the HCV program is relatively low and is concentrated along the western portion of the city in largely non-Hispanic White areas, as indicated in Map 14. Data is not available on the percentage of voucher units in much of Walnut Creek. Patterns in the location of publicly supported housing that primarily serves families with children, elderly persons, or persons with disabilities in relation to segregated areas or R/ECAPs Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) LIHTC properties include units that serve large families, seniors, and persons with disabilities. In Contra Costa, nearly 6,500 units are devoted to large families in 59 different developments; over 2,600 units are earmarked for seniors in 34 different developments; and special needs and at-risk populations are served in three developments with 91 units. Table 12 shows the concentration of LIHTC properties overall. Over 40 percent of all developments and 35 percent of all units are located in only five percent of the census tracts in the County, 11 of them located in only eight communities. Those tracts average 13 percent Black, 44 percent Hispanic and 23 percent Poverty, all significantly higher than the County averages. Twenty-seven large family (46 percent of the total), 11 senior, and two other developments are located in these highly concentrated areas. Public Housing Public housing properties (13 in the County’s jurisdiction) have units allocated for disabled, family and elderly households. Public housing currently totals 1,193 units (HUD data count 1,460 but some units have been converted to RAD and other units are empty awaiting disposition). Public housing includes at least 60 households with an individual with disabilities and 400 families with children according to PHA and HUD data. Project-Based Vouchers Properties with HACCC project-based vouchers include eight for seniors and fourteen for families out of a total of 22. Seniors benefit from 346 units in those eight developments while families make up 233 units in the fourteen family developments. HUD also lists another 30 project-based developments in the County totaling 2,551 units.. The average White population is 35 percent, Blacks 34 percent, Hispanics 19 percent, and Asians 18 percent. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 160 of ? There are 19 Other Multi-Family developments listed with 836 units. The average demographic breakdown of these developments is: 37 percent White, 19 percent Black, 21 percent Hispanic, and 27 percent Asian. The Las Deltas public housing development is undergoing disposition and relocation of residents using transferred Project-Based Vouchers (PBV) obtained through a RAD conversion. Las Deltas is located in a tract that has a 34 percent poverty rate and is 21 percent Black and 60 percent Hispanic, with a low HUD opportunity index score and a high distress score. Rather than re-build the 214 units on site, the PHA has opted to sell the property and transfer the housing assistance to other developments through PBVs, following RAD program regulations. Only 81 residents remained in the development at the time information was gathered for this report. In an analysis of the new location for Las Deltas PBVs, there are 125 units committed to 12 developments, with 89-unit locations to be determined. Relocation is underway with 17 moves to other public housing developments and three moves with tenant-based HCV assistance. Once the relocation is complete, a fair housing analysis should be done to ascertain demographic distribution of residents throughout the jurisdiction. Comparison of demographic composition of publicly supported housing in R/ECAPS to that of publicly supported housing outside of R/ECAPs A significantly higher proportion of occupants of housing supported by the HCV program that is located within the one officially identified R/ECAP are Black compared to occupants of housing supported by the HCV program that lie outside of the R/ECAP. The proportion of HCV residents who belong to other racial and ethnic groups is lower inside the R/ECAP than outside of the R/ECAP. In addition, a higher share of HCV housing residents within the R/ECAP have a disability and a lower share of occupants are elderly or are households with children. Table 13 shows the demographics of occupied HCV units in the R/ECAP census tract versus non-R/ECAP census tracts in Concord. Significant differences in demographic composition among developments Public Housing The Public Housing units operated by the HACCC, and for which there are data, are often demographically disparate with regard to race (see Table 14in the Technical Appendix PSH section). For example, whereas the Vista Del Camino, El Pueblo, and Bayo Vista developments have 51 percent, 58 percent, and 63 percent Black tenants, respectively, the Case de Serena, Elder Winds, and Alhambra Terrace developments have only 36 percent, 28 percent, and 16 percent Black tenants, respectively. This dynamic is reversed among these six developments for the percentage of White tenants, with the former three developments comprising a significantly higher percentage of White tenants than the latter three. Hispanics and Asians are relatively more proportionately distributed amongst Public Housing units, though disparities nonetheless exist. For example, the percentage of Hispanics in a given unit ranges 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 161 of ? from 15 percent in Bayo Vista to 25 percent in Elder Winds. Likewise, the percentage of Asians ranges from five percent in Bayo Vista to 18 percent in Alhambra Terrace. The County’s Public Housing units also indicate slight disparities in the percentage of households with children; for example, 10 percent of households Alhambra Terrace have children, whereas 45 percent and 61 percent of households in El Pueblo and Bayo Vista, respectively have children. While Elder Winds has only seven percent of households with children, it is housing primarily designated for seniors. While the City of Richmond Housing Authority’s (RHA) Public Housing developments do not feature the same racial disparities between developments, they are all starkly Black and Hispanic, ranging from 76 percent Black in Nystrom Village to 85 percent Black in Richmond Village I. There are very few Whites in RHA’s developments; in Richmond Village III, there are no White tenant households. The development with the greatest percentage of White households has nine percent (Nevin Plaza). Most RHA units have a high percentage of households with children (between 45 percent-72 percent), except for Nevin Plaza, designated as housing for seniors and individuals with disabilities. Project-Based Rental Assistance (PBRA) Housing While the HUD data is incomplete for PBRA Housing within the Consortium area, the available data, shown in Table 15, reveals disparities across units. For example, developments such as Tice Oaks Apartments, Chilpacingo Vista, and Phoenix Apartments (among others) are 87 percent, 85 percent, and 82 percent White, respectively, whereas developments such as Crescent Park, Deliverance Temple II, and Arbors Apartments are 84 percent, 76 percent, and 74 percent Black, respectively. Other units, such as Lido Square I and La Vista Apartments, are majority Hispanic, composed of 59 percent and 55 percent Hispanic households, respectively. Whereas most developments have an Asian population averaging approximately 14 percent, two units - Eskaton Hazel Shirley Manor and El Portal Gardens - are majority Asian households (61 percent and 56 percent, respectively). PBRA Housing within the Consortium area also varies with respect to households with children. Of the 17 developments for which there is data, eight developments have between 60-80 percent households with children. An additional six have between 30-60 percent households with children, while the most drastic outliers have seven percent and eight percent (East Santa Fe Avenue Apartments, and Chilpacingo Vista, respectively). Other Multifamily Housing There is very limited HUD data available for Other Multifamily Housing. Nonetheless, the data that is available, gathered into Table 16, reveals inter-development racial disparities. Other Multifamily Housing developments are generally occupied by Whites and Asians, followed by Hispanics and Blacks. Some units, such as, Montego Place and Valley Vista Senior Housing, are almost exclusively White and Asian, housing 64 percent and 23 percent White, and 33 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 162 of ? percent and 63 percent Asian, households respectively. Others have significantly fewer White and Asian tenants, instead comprising majority Black and Hispanic households, such as, Columbia Park Manor (42 percent Black, 19 percent Hispanic) and Community Heritage Senior Housing (68 percent Black and 15 percent Hispanic). Others still are slightly more evenly apportioned racially, such as, Presidio Village Senior Housing (30 percent White, 15 percent Black, 31 percent Hispanic, 23 percent Asian). There is data for only three developments with regard to households with children. These developments - Alvarez Court Apartments, Peace Grove, Inc., and Silver Oak Apartments - have 16 percent, five percent, and four percent of households with children, respectively. RAD In the HACCC jurisdiction there is only one RAD conversion applicable. That is Las Deltas located in Richmond. HUD and the PHA have no demographic data for this development since residents are in process of relocations. Additional relevant information about occupancy, by protected class Project Based Rental Assistance (PBRA) There is incomplete data on families with children in HUD’s Table 8 for 30 listed PBRA developments. Seventeen of the developments have varying occupancy by families with children, ranging from seven percent to 83 percent of residents within each development. Hispanics constitute the majority in four developments and Asians make up the majority in two. Asians make up 56 percent and 61 percent in two PBV projects. There is no data for other protected classes, such as national origin, religion, or households with an individual with a disability. Comparison of the demographics of developments to the demographic composition of the areas in which they are located Public Housing The demographics of the jurisdiction’s public housing developments are not necessarily reflective of the corresponding census tract’s demographics, as shown in Table 17. While some developments, such as Vista del Camino and Elder Winds, have roughly similar property and census tract demographics, the majority of properties depart demographically from their corresponding census tract. Particularly extreme examples include the three Richmond Village developments (0-4 percent White in developments, 28 percent White in census tract; 77-85 percent Black in developments, 28 percent Black in census tract) and Alhambra Terrace (44 percent White in development, 72 percent White in census tract; 16 percent Black in development, four percent Black in census tract; 18 percent Asian in development, three percent Asian in census tract). 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 163 of ? Project Based Rental Assistance (PBRA) PBRA housing developments are largely demographically dissimilar from their respective census tracts (Table 18). For example, the St. Johns Apartments have 61 percent Black tenants, significantly higher than the 23 percent Black population in its corresponding census tract. Similarly, Pullman Point has 72 percent Black and 14 percent Hispanic tenants, while located in a census tract that is 44 percent Black and 43 percent Hispanic. Other extreme examples of demographic divergence between development and census tract include Arbors Apartment (74 percent Black in property vs. 53 percent in census tract), Orinda Senior Village (66 percent White in property vs. 38 percent in census tract; nine percent Hispanic in property vs. 39 percent in tract), Emerson Arms (39 percent Black in property vs. 18 percent in tract), Eskaton Hazel Shirley Manor (61 percent Asian in property vs. 33 percent in tract), Concord Residential Club (74 percent White in property vs. 49 percent in tract, zero percent Black in property vs. 22 percent in tract), El Portal Gardens (56 percent Asian in property vs. 16 percent in tract), and Barrett Terrace Apartments (66 percent Black in property vs. 32 percent in tract; nine percent Hispanic in property vs. 56 percent in tract). Relatively few developments closely resemble the demographics of the census tract in which they are located Those that do reflect their census tract include the Chateau Lafayette development, which diverges at most four percentage points in the case of White tenants while almost exactly mirroring the census tract’s demographics for Blacks, Hispanics, and Asians, and Lido Square I, which diverges at most four percentage points in the case of its Black population. Other Multifamily Assisted Developments There are often stark disparities between the demographics of other multifamily assisted developments and their surrounding census tract (see Table 19”). All but five developments feature a demographic divergence of more than 20 percentage points for at least one racial group. Particularly extreme examples include Valley Vista Senior Housing (23 percent White in property vs. 58 percent White in tract; 63 percent Asian in property vs. 23 percent Asian in tract), Montego Place (64 percent White in property vs. 11 percent White in tract; zero percent Black in property vs. 39 percent Black in tract; three percent Hispanic in property vs. 38 percent Hispanic in tract; 33 percent Asian in property vs. seven percent Asian in tract), and Sycamore Place (75 percent White in property vs. 44 percent White in tract; 20 percent Hispanic in property vs. 41 percent Hispanic in tract). Antioch As indicated in Table 20, the Elder Winds public housing development serves a disproportionately large share of Black residents compared to the census tract in which it is located. The PBRA units of the Hudson Townhouse Manor development also has a disproportionately high share of Black residents and a disproportionately smaller share of non-Hispanic White residents. In the other multifamily assisted housing properties, Asians 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 164 of ? and Pacific Islanders make up a far higher proportion of residents than of the surrounding areas while Blacks and non-Hispanic Whites are underserved. Concord Among PBRA properties, Clayton Villa, Hidden Creek Townhomes, and La Vista Apartments have significantly more Asian American residents compared to the share of Asian Americans in the population of the surrounding areas (see Table 21). Hispanic residents are overrepresented at La Vista Apartments and Black residents are overrepresented at the Phoenix Apartments. Non-Hispanic White residents are substantially overrepresented in Concord Creek Residential Club and in the Phoenix Apartments. In other multifamily assisted housing, Black residents comprise a significantly larger share of the Caldera Place Apartments than they do of the population of the surrounding census tract. Pittsburg In Table 22, we see that the El Pueblo apartments, a public housing development in Pittsburg, have a disproportionately greater share of Black and Non-Hispanic White residents and a smaller share of Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic residents compared to the census tract in which it is located. For PBRA properties in Pittsburg, the demographics of Stoneman Village do not match the demographics of the census tract in which it is situated. The East Santa Fe Avenue Apartments serve a substantially higher proportion of Black residents and a lower proportion of Hispanic residents compared to the census tract it serves. The demographics of the Lido Square Apartments largely reflect the demographics of the surrounding census tract. For the three other multifamily assisted housing projects, there is a disparity as Asian and Pacific Islander residents make up a larger share of residents when compared to the surrounding census tracts while Hispanic residents are underserved. Non- Hispanic White residents make up a disproportionately large share of occupants in Columbia Park manor and in Presidio Village Senior Housing. Walnut Creek In Walnut Creek, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are generally overrepresented among occupants of publicly supported housing while Hispanic residents are underrepresented (Table 22). Hispanic residents make up a smaller share of the Tice Oaks Apartments compared to the surrounding census tracts while non-Hispanic White residents and Asians and Pacific Islanders are overrepresented. Hispanic residents are also underrepresented in the Casa Montego development while Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are substantially overrepresented. In the Montego Place development, Asian Americans make up a disproportionately large share of residents as well while Hispanic residents are underrepresented. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 165 of ? Disparities in Access to Opportunity for Residents of PSH Region The Region and County show similar trends in relationships between opportunity and the location of publicly-supported housing. Map 15 in the Technical Appendix PSH section represents the location of various forms of PSH in the region. The region’s PSH is generally located in areas that are low-opportunity with regard to school proficiency and environmental health. The East Bay area, which contains a substantial portion of the region’s PSH, performs the worst on the Jobs Proximity Index, Labor Market Index, and Low Poverty, though the disparities across the region for these factors are not as stark as other opportunity factors. The starkest indicators of low opportunity are seen in the School Proficiency Index and the Environmental Health Index, with the majority of the region’s PSH concentrated in the lowest performing areas on both metrics, (predominantly) the areas immediately surrounding the bay. Maps 16-22 in the PSH Technical Appendix are, modifications of HUD Maps 7-13 from the AFFH-Tool. These provide a visualization of disparities in access to opportunity for residents of publicly supported housing in the jurisdiction. While precise details vary and are detailed below, taken together the maps illustrate that the jurisdiction’s publicly supported housing is predominantly located in low-opportunity areas. Each map superimposes the jurisdiction’s PSH over the HUD opportunity dimension. The jurisdiction’s public housing can be roughly divided into three geographical regions: the western coastal area, central Contra Costa, and the northeastern boundary of Contra Costa. LIHTC units are spread relatively evenly throughout the three regions. While Project-Based Rental Assistance housing is also spread across the three regions, it is most heavily concentrated in central Contra Costa (12 developments vs. eight and five in Western and Northeastern Contra Costa, respectively). Other Multifamily Housing is also spread across the three regions, with an equal number of developments (six) in Western and Northeastern Contra Costa, and slightly fewer (four) in central Contra Costa. Public Housing is most heavily concentrated in Western Contra Costa (nine developments vs. three in Northeastern Contra Costa and zero in central Contra Costa). School Proficiency As the map (see Map 16 appendix) demonstrates, most of the jurisdiction’s publicly supported housing is clustered in areas that rank very low on the school proficiency index, particularly on the west coast and the northeast where Public Housing and Other Multifamily housing is more heavily concentrated. In central Contra Costa, publicly supported housing is generally in areas that rank low on the school proficiency index, although school proficiency increases in publicly supported housing as one moves further south in the jurisdiction. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 166 of ? Job Proximity In contrast to school proficiency, the jurisdiction’s publicly supported housing is in areas that vary with regard to job proximity (see Map 17). Central Contra Costa’s publicly supported housing is in areas that rank relatively higher on the job proximity index, while western Contra Costa features publicly supported housing in areas that generally rank lower on the job proximity index. The location of Northeastern Contra Costa’s PSH varies widely, often located in tracts with adjacent tracts that vary significantly on the job proximity index. Because of the nature of job concentration in urban areas, the comparison between job proximity and the location of PSH is one of the less-stark indicators of low access to opportunity in Contra Costa’s publicly supported housing. Labor Market The PSH in Western and Northeastern Contra Costa tends to be located in areas that rank poorly on the labor market index (seeMap 18). While Central Contra Costa’s northern PSH is in lower-performing labor market areas, the bulk of central Contra Costa’s PSH is located in areas that perform well on the labor market index. The housing in central Contra Costa mainly includes LIHTC and Project-Based Rental Assistance housing, whereas Public Housing and, to a lesser extent Other Multifamily housing, tends to be in Western and Northeastern Contra Costa, and consequently tends to be in areas that perform worse on the labor market index. Transit Trips and Low Transportation Costs HUD data in Map 19 does not point to differences in access to transportation opportunity across the jurisdiction. However, map 75 in the Disparities to Opportunity section shows that commute times to work are especially long for workers living in north and north-western Contra Costa County. There appear to be significant numbers of LIHTC, Other Multi-family, and several Project-Based Rental Assistance developments near Pittsburg, Antioch and westward. These areas also have the highest shares of workers with long commutes. Low Poverty Northeast Contra Costa’s PSH (see Map 20), which is primarily composed of LIHTC and Project-Based Rental Assistance units, is in areas that perform the worst on the Low Poverty Index. Western Contra Costa’s PSH areas also perform relatively poorly on the Low Poverty index and comprises the majority of the County’s Public Housing in addition to a significant number of LIHTC units. Central Contra Costa performs relatively well on the Low Poverty index, again featuring a north-south divide, with more northern units located in lower- performing areas and southern units located in higher performing areas on the low poverty index. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 167 of ? Environmental Health As the map (see Map 21) shows, Contra Costa jurisdiction performs near-universally poorly on the Environmental Health Index, with all three regions of the County’s PSH comprising the main geographical areas with the lowest scores on the index. Also, as seen on map 13b, Contra Costa’s PSH is generally located in areas with the highest CalEnviroScreen scores. Scores are particularly high in Western and Northeastern Contra Costa, with the PSH located in areas that are almost exclusively orange or red, indicating areas of hazardous environmental health. While central Contra Costa’s PSH is located in areas that fare better than the west and northeast, the majority of this housing is nonetheless located in yellow or light green areas, meaning that it scores poorly relative to the mostly-dark green surrounding areas. In short, assessing Contra Costa’s PSH in relation to the region’s CalEnviroScreen scores illustrates that those who live in Contra Costa’s PSH are disproportionately exposed to environmental health hazards. Contributing Factors of Publicly Supported Housing Location and Occupancy Admission/occupancy policies/procedures, including preferences in publicly supported housing Preferences and waitlists Housing authority preference and waitlist policies can impact access to housing subsidies by shaping who is able to access subsidized and/or public housing. All waitlists for HACCC, HACP, and RHA are currently closed for new applications. HACCC HACCC maintains a single waitlist for the HCV program and separate site-based lists for each PBV. There is one waitlist for HACCC’s public housing units. HACCC uses a point system based individual or household characteristics to organize its waitlist for public housing, which is detailed in its 2018 Admissions and Continued Occupancy Policy. There are three preferences that are awarded one point: Veterans, Residents of Contra Costa County (defined as those living or working in the County, regardless of length of residency or employment); and Elderly/Disabled preference over singles. One category is awarded ten points. This is the category of Displaced Families (families who have been involuntarily displaced from housing due to a federal or state declared disaster, government action (e.g., code enforcement, public improvement or 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 168 of ? development. Government action will also include participants in a witness protection program). Given increasing displacement of low-income families due to quickly rising costs of living in Contra Costa County, as discussed under “Contributing Factors to Segregation” in the Fair Housing Analysis section, HACCC may consider rebalancing points in order to provide for greater preference for Residents of Contra Costa County to help stem this displacement and support economic diversity in its jurisdiction. HACCC reports a relatively small number of households on its HCV list. Like its public housing waitlist, HACCC uses a point system for organization of its HCV tenant-based and project- based program waitlists that is detailed in its 2018 Administrative Plan. Preference points range from one (for Veterans) to 500 (for households graduating from Permanent Supportive Housing and those in RAD converted units). Current residents of HACCC’s jurisdiction are awarded 10 points, and those “who live, work, or have been hired to work in the City where a housing unit is located” are given 32 points. Again, HACCC may consider rebalancing its waitlist organization to allow for greater preference for local residents within its jurisdiction to help slow displacement due to economic pressures. HACP HACP’s tenant-based and project-based HCV waitlists are organized similarly, as detailed in its 2018 Administrative Plan, with some additional provisions for PBV assistance. Applicants to HACP’s HCV programs are organized by either veteran/non-veteran, or resident/non- resident, and ranked accordingly. The preferences are greatest for veterans that are residents of Pittsburg, and least for non-veteran, non-resident households. The preference of “Pittsburg residents” is broadly defined as “Any household family member who lives, works, or has been hired to work, or attending school in the city of Pittsburg.” As Consortium members and data have pointed to the migration of low-income families from west to east within the County, the breadth of this HACP policy provides for a greater safety net to counter against further loss of economic diversity within the Consortium. RHA Similar to HACCC and HACP, RHA details a point-based system of organization for its HCV tenant-based and project-based programs in its 2018 Administrative Plan. RHA gives greatest preference to those in its PBV program that were denied a tenant-based voucher due to lack of availability, and families that have been terminated from its HCV program due to insufficient program funding. These preferences indicate a commitment to ensuring current and/or former participants of RHA’s HCV programs are provided assistance first. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 169 of ? RHA’s two public housing developments, Nevin Plaza and Nystrom Village, each have their own waitlist. Nevin Plaza is organized as housing for seniors age 62 and over and/or individuals with disabilities. Nystrom Village, a scattered site development, is stated to be housing for “families, including seniors and disabled households” on RHA’s website. RHA has indicated in its 2018 Annual Plan that it will be seeking to reposition Nevin Plaza and Nystrom Village for comprehensive rehabilitation. Current residents, as proposed, would receive Tenant Protection Vouchers to ensure continuation of housing assistance and would be guaranteed first right of return after rehab completion. This would effectively necessitate that no new families be offered subsidies from RHA’s public housing waitlist until such rehabilitation is complete and former residents are provided the opportunity to return. Community opposition Community opposition is discussed in detail in the Segregation analysis section of this AFH. As based on community input, it is a contributing factor to the siting of affordable housing. Displacement of residents due to economic pressures As residents are displaced from non-subsidized housing due to economic pressures, as described in the Fair Housing Analysis section, many may turn to rely on the Consortium’s limited publicly supported housing programs and supply. There are steps detailed throughout this document and the Goals and Priorities section that can help focus these limited resources to best serve residents within the Consortium’s jurisdiction while preserving fair housing rights and greater housing choice, including conducting a rental market survey to determine the need for higher payment standards for HCVs within the allowable 90 percent-110 percent of Fair Market Rent (FMR) and/or requests to HUD for setting of Exception Payment Standards above 110 percent of FMR. Consideration of Small Area FMR implementation should also be given to determine cost/savings to the PHAs and potential for opening higher-cost, higher-opportunity areas to HCV households. Lack of access to opportunity due to high housing costs Lack of access to opportunity due to high housing costs is a contributing factor to the location and occupancy of publicly supported housing. High housing costs make it difficult for low- income individuals to access higher-opportunity neighborhoods, even with a subsidy such as a Housing Choice Voucher. This is reflected in HCV locational patterns throughout the Consortium’s jurisdiction. For instance, Walnut Creek, an area with a low rate of poverty, access to public transit, and well-performing schools, has approximately 147 units occupied by Housing Choice Voucher holders. Conversely, Antioch, a municipality with higher poverty levels and lower overall opportunities for economic mobility, has 2,243 HCV-subsidized households. This may be due in part to the Section 8 Fair Market Rents for Contra Costa, which are calculated by HUD utilizing retrospective census data and do not capture rising rents in quickly-changing housing markets. For example, the average rent for a Walnut Creek two- 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 170 of ? bedroom apartment is $2,682. However, HACCC's FMR for a two-bedroom apartment is $2,390, meaning that many apartments in Contra Costa will not be available to voucher holders. More starkly, the average rent for a two-bedroom home in Orinda is $4,000 dollars, making this area of HACCC’s jurisdiction nearly inaccessible to HCV households. Consortium PHA members have the authority to set local payment standards between 90 percent-110 percent of HUD Fair Market Rents. This is discussed further below under Impediments to Mobility: Lack of Appropriate Payment Standards. Lack of meaningful language access HACCC and RHA have incorporated similar language into their respective 2018 Administrative Plans, and HACCC into its 2018 Admissions and Continued Occupancy Policy, that meets the HUD Limited English Proficiency (LEP) guidance for making reasonable efforts to provide language assistance. This includes conducting HUD’s recommended four-factor analysis369, determining that translated documents are needed by LEP applicants or those with which the PHAs may come into contact, and that specifies the translation of vital materials, as needed. According to HACCC, these steps are followed as the need arises, such as when a waiting list opens. HACP has included a significantly truncated version of LEP language into its 2018 Administrative Plan, which states that HACP will take the following into consideration when determining the feasibility of providing translated documents: 1) Number of applicants and participants in the jurisdiction who do not speak English but rather speak another language; 2) Estimated cost to HACP per client for translation of English written documents into another language. HACP does not thoroughly address Limited English Proficiency as recommended by HUD. A formal LEP section should be incorporated following HUD’s guidelines. Loss of affordable housing Loss of affordable housing is discussed in more detail in the Disproportionate Housing Needs analysis. Additionally, loss of affordable housing impacts publicly supported housing, as demand for programs such as HCV and public housing increases with housing costs. According to a 2016 database, a person remained on the waiting list for vouchers for the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa (HACCC) for an average of 47 months. Quality of affordable housing information programs 369 As described online at https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/fair_housing_equal_opp/promotingfh/lep- faq#q7 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 171 of ? Unit listings HACCC and HACP guide HCV participants in the housing search stage through their websites and briefing materials to the GoSection8 website, a commercial rental listing service widely- employed by PHAs. Via GoSection8, rental listings are generated directly by housing providers already familiar with the HCV program, and to be viewed by primarily by tenant- based HCV program participants. While services such as GoSection8 allow HCV-friendly housing providers to directly market units to HCV participants, research has shown that such services may be inhibiting voucher mobility and perpetuating segregation, with available rental listings in neighborhoods of high poverty and with low opportunity factors far outweighing those in lower-poverty, higher-opportunity areas.370 To better insure the fair housing choice of voucher participants, HACCC and HACP may consider more actively guiding HCV participants to mainstream housing search tools, such as Craigslist, Hot Pads, and other local sources that will provide participants with greater variety in location of available listings. HACCC also provides online at its website a list of affordable housing developments. HACCC also provides a list of HUD affordable housing units to those searching for family, senior and disabled housing throughout the County. RHA internally generates an available unit list, which is updated weekly on its website. Landlords must fill out a form for a unit to be included in the list. In a faster-moving market such as that in Richmond, where a unit may be rented in a matter of days or less, it is recommended that in addition to its manually-created list, RHA provides links to online housing search tools available to the general public and guidance on other ways of accessing unit listings in a manner that is timely to the housing market demand. In addition, approximately 22 percent of RHA’s unit listings371 were roughly $100 - $500 over payment standards. A disclaimer at the bottom of each listing sheet states that “there is no guarantee that the rents listed are, either reasonable or approvable…”. However, it is may serve RHA HCV program participants more directly to only include units that are within payment standards. Briefing materials HACCC Two versions of HACCC’s briefing materials can be found online through its website. One version is clearly outdated, with HCV payment standards from October 2014 included within. 370 PRRAC. June 2015. Constraining Choice: The Role of Online Apartment Listing Services in the Housing Choice Voucher Program; found at https://prrac.org/pdf/ConstrainingChoice.pdf 371 Dated October 29. 2018. ound at https://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/440/Rental- Listing?bidId=. Last accessed 11/5/18. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 172 of ? The second is undated and does not guide participants to specific, time-bound information, but rather provides general information and guidance to participants about the program’s policies and procedures. After further clarification, HACCC has two versions of its briefing materials – one for participants continuing in the program and one for new voucher participants. HACCC is recommended to ensure materials on its website are clearly titled and up-to-date. The version for continuing participants is a truncated version of the materials for new voucher participants. However, both versions of the briefing packet have basic informational elements required by HUD, such as payment standards, porting information, reasonable accommodation information, and direct housing seekers to GoSection8 for available listings. Both also include information and maps on areas of low incomes and high minority concentrations. The new participant packet includes additional information on filing a housing discrimination complaint with HUD, transportation information, and extensive lists of resources in the County. HACCC may consider combining some information from each set of briefing materials to provide participants with information on rental housing search assistance that will guide participants to mainstream sources for searching online, and information on direct services and partners within the County that can provide further assistance to participants as they move through their housing search. HACP No briefing materials were received from HACP for review. RHA RHA’s briefing material consists primarily of information relating to the administration of the HCV program itself, including a HUD-created pamphlet from September 2010 on how rent is determined and a utility allowance schedule dated July 1, 2017; and forms such as a sample Request for Tenancy Approval and a rent calculation worksheet. No information is presented in the packet regarding where and how to search for housing, or guidance on how and when to request a Reasonable Accommodation. It is recommended that RHA consider updating its briefing materials in a manner that both functionally informs participants of program expectations and recognizes and supports fair housing choice. Such updates may include detailed information on search times, how to find housing via online and other sources, RHA’s port process, current payment standards and utility allowances, and other such information to assist participants in utilizing their vouchers in the community of their choosing. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 173 of ? Landlord outreach HACCC, HACP, and RHA all state in their respective Administrative Plans that they will actively work to recruit owners outside areas of poverty and minority concentration. HACCC and RHA include in their Plans basic guidelines of where and how they conduct outreach and develop relationships with owners. RHA’s outreach is the most detailed, with information about specific media sources and a direct link to its website that prospective owners can visit to receive more information. The Owner Outreach section of HACP’s Administrative Plan does not detail its owner outreach, but rather states that a list of interested landlords is available through GoSection8. It does state that printed materials are available for interested owners to acquaint them with HCV program opportunities. It is recommended that HACP indicates where and how it conducts owner outreach in its Owner Outreach section to demonstrate its commitment to such recruitment efforts. Impediments to mobility Lack of mobility counseling The housing authorities located in Contra Costa County currently lack funding to implement full-scale housing mobility programs. A formal counseling program, as found in Chicago, Dallas, Baltimore, and elsewhere, can make a significant difference in the settlement patterns of HCV households. These programs generally identify opportunity areas, while assisting voucher holders to find new residences within them. Workshops and information sessions allow for participants to ask questions, find higher-performing schools and locate areas of lower crime. Individual counselors may provide assistance to families to find units in opportunity areas, while also following up post-move to ensure the family is adjusting well to their new neighborhood. Lack of appropriate payment standards A significant barrier in the County is the lack of affordable housing and the sufficiency of payment standards to provide geographic options to voucher holders. Conducting a rental market study in the Consortium’s public housing jurisdictions can ensure FMRs are set within reasonable limits that give HCV participants greater fair housing choice and do not limit their ability to access higher-opportunity neighborhoods. HACCC While HACCC has a two-tier system of payment standards to try to capture higher cost areas, it has not implemented Small Area Fair Market Rents (SAFMRs) based on zip codes, or payment standards based on 110 percent of SAFMRs, where appropriate, to facilitate access 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 174 of ? to many higher-opportunity areas. By selectively adopting SAFMRs, it could increase HCV participant fair housing choice in opportunity areas. HACCC’s regular payment standard for the Eastern part of the jurisdiction is set below 100 percent of the HUD published Fair Market Rent (FMR) for the larger Statistical Metropolitan Area jurisdiction. This payment standard level is used for the cities of Antioch, Bay Point, Bethel Island, Brentwood, Byron, Discovery Bay, Knightsen, and Oakley, areas with larger numbers of vouchers, poverty and non-white populations. They are also the areas with the most available affordable housing in the County. The lower payment standard is specifically set to discourage the continued migration of assisted families to these impacted areas. HACCC’s second tier of payment standards is set at 103 percent of FMRs for all other parts of the County, allowing for HCV participant access to stronger market areas where fewer voucher holders live. Census data from the 2012-2016 Five-Year ACS indicates an approximately five percent vacancy rate in the County. An additional look at median rents by census tract and bedroom size indicates the cost of a two-bedroom unit at $2,893. HACCC’s 2018 FMR for a two- bedroom unit is $2,329. Given the high cost of and large demand for housing in the region, HACCC may want to consider taking additional steps to open higher-income areas to voucher households. For instance, HACCC could request the ability to set payment standards at 120 percent of FMR in areas deemed “opportunity”. At 120 percent of FMR, a voucher could potentially offset the cost of a two-bedroom unit up to $2,795, allowing for wider access to higher-cost markets that tend to hold greater opportunities for upward mobility. Under the SAFMR payment standards for 2018, as set by HUD by zip code, a two-bedroom voucher could range from $1,960 - $3,490. HACP HACP has a single payment standard for each FMR area in its jurisdiction, ranging from $1,463 for a studio unit to $4873 for a 6-bedroom unit. HACP’s Administrative Plan details the housing authority’s ability to set higher payment standards should it find it needs to expand housing opportunities outside areas of minority concentration, so long as the payment standard remains within HUD’s allowable 90 percent-110 percent of FMR. The Plan as currently authorized does not allow for exception payment standards, except in the case of reasonable accommodation for a person with disabilities. If and when such accommodations are needed, HACP will not exceed 120 percent of FMR. HACP’s Plan specifies that it may conduct a review of units to determine how often owners are increasing rents and the average percent of increase by bedroom size using GoSection8, but that it will “not raise Payment Standards solely to make “high end” units available to 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 175 of ? Voucher holders.”372 This statement calls to mind negative public narratives of voucher participants utilizing public funds to rent in luxury units,373 and could raise fair housing concerns, in particular for individuals with disabilities who often need to look to higher-cost units in new, often “luxury” buildings built to meet fair housing accessibility standards. HACP can ensure its HCV program is meeting the its overall intention of making 40 percent-50 percent of the housing market available to low-income renters without calling attention to negative stereotypes or narratives. It is recommended that this statement be removed from future Administrative Plans. RHA RHA lists on its website that its existing payment standards range from $1,506 for a studio unit to $3,650 for a four-bedroom unit. RHA’s Administrative Plan indicates that the PHA sets payment standards within the “basic range” of 90 percent-110 percent of HUD’s FMRs. RHA does not utilize Exception Payment Standards, except as a reasonable accommodation. As discussed in previous sections, the City of Richmond is experiencing a rapid shift in its housing market as displacement occurs from the Bay Area, causing rises in demand for and costs of housing. A formal rental market scan may help RHA in setting payment standards that provide HCV participants greater fair housing choice within its jurisdiction and avoid further displacement of low-income families from Richmond. HCV portability issues While no fair housing-related portability issues have been reported or are apparent in a scan of PHA policies and procedures, given the proximity of all Consortium PHAs to each other, greater efficiencies and improved regional coordination may result from the creation of cooperative agreements among each PHA regarding the movement of voucher holders among jurisdictions. Such agreements may require amending Administrative Plans to match port procedures and/or HUD approval. However, this could lead to greater access to opportunity for low-income families and lessen financial and administrative burdens among Consortium PHAs. Lack of adequate search time Having adequate search time is critical to ensuring HCV participants’ can exercise their fair housing choice, particularly in high-demand housing markets that do not have fair housing protections for participants in the HCV program, such as in the Consortium’s jurisdiction. 372 HACP 2018 Administrative Plan, pg. 120. 373 As one example, see https://abc7chicago.com/home/cha-subsidizing-citys-priciest-rents-for-low-income- residents/225671/, a discussion of previous payment standards utilized by the Chicago Housing Authority that provided HCV participants the ability to move into higher-end apartments. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 176 of ? While longer search times may not be preferable for PHAs due to budget and resource constraints, allowing additional search time, coupled with other policies and practices that promote voucher household mobility and help participants to become more self-sufficient over time, could in the long run lead to less dependence on the voucher programs overall. HACCC currently issues new vouchers for 90 days and second-move vouchers for 120 days. Extensions are possible for limited reasons, as stated in their Administrative Plan, for an undefined amount of time. HACCC’s Administrative Plan is thorough in providing the housing authority leeway in granting extensions due to rental market prohibitions. This is notable given the lack of fair housing protections for voucher participants in the County and the high demand nation of the housing market. With these factors in mind, it is suggested that HACCC considers changing its 90-day initial search time to at least 120 days so that new voucher participants may have the same benefit of searching in a tight housing market as current voucher participants. HACP and RHA allow for an initial search time of 120 days. Extensions for both PHAs are granted on a case-by-case basis and for limited reasons. RHA’s Administrative Plan indicates that extensions will be approved in 60-day increments. HACP’s policy does not indicate for how long an extension will be granted past the 120 day initial search time. Lack of private investment Lack of private investment is discussed in detail in the Segregation analysis, above. This affects access to opportunity by residents of publicly-supported housing, because of the relative lack of investments in high-poverty and/or segregated areas, where such housing is disproportionately located. Lack of public investment Lack of public investment is discussed in detail in the Segregation analysis, above. This affects access to opportunity by residents of publicly-supported housing, because of the relative lack of investments in high-poverty and/or segregated areas, where such housing is disproportionately located. Land use and zoning Land use and zoning is discussed in detail in the Segregation analysis, above, and is a contributing factor to the location of publicly-supported housing, as it impedes the construction of a range of housing types in many locations throughout the County. Loss of affordable housing Loss of affordable housing is discussed in detail in the Disproportionate Housing Needs analysis, above. This is a contributing factor to the location of publicly-supported housing, because acquisition is made more difficult by prohibitive costs, and rent levels may be too high for voucher holders to access a range of neighborhoods. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 177 of ? Occupancy codes and restrictions Occupancy codes and restrictions are discussed in detail in the Segregation analysis, above. These codes, when applied in conjunction with the lack of family-sized units, may affect the ability of some households to access a range of neighborhoods. Source of income discrimination/protection Source of income discrimination (and the lack of protections) is a significant contributing factor. This is discussed in detail in the Segregation analysis, above. Discrimination against voucher holders is prevalent and stands as a large impediment to residents seeking to access housing and move throughout the County. Siting selection policies/practices/decisions for publicly supported housing including discretionary aspects of QAP plans and other programs. HACCC HACCC’s current site selection policy is as follows: in keeping with HUD standards, it is HACCC's goal to select sites for PBV housing that provide for de-concentrating poverty and expanding housing and economic opportunities. In complying with this goal, HACCC will limit approval to sites for PBV housing in census tracts that have poverty concentrations of 20 percent or less. HACCC will grant exceptions to the 20 percent standard where it determines that the PBV assistance will complement other local redevelopment activities designed to de- concentrate poverty and expand housing and economic opportunities in census tracts with poverty concentrations greater than 20 percent, such as sites in:  A census tract in which the proposed PBV development will be located in a HUD- designated Enterprise Zone, Economic Community, or Renewal Community;  A census tract where the concentration of assisted units will be or has decreased as a result of public housing demolition and HOPE VI redevelopment;  A census tract in which the proposed PBV development will be located is undergoing significant revitalization as a result of state, local, or federal dollars invested in the area;  A census tract where new market rate units are being developed where such market rate units will positively impact the poverty rate in the area;  A census tract where there has been an overall decline in the poverty rate within the past five years; or  A census tract where there are meaningful opportunities for educational and economic advancement. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 178 of ? RHA Richmond’s current site selection policy similarly follows the HUD standards, and provides: it is RHA’s goal to select sites for PBV housing that provide for deconcentrating poverty and expanding housing and economic opportunities. In complying with this goal RHA will limit approval of sites for PBV housing in census tracts that have poverty concentrations of 20 percent or less. However, RHA will grant exceptions to the 20 percent standard where RHA determines that the PBV assistance will complement other local redevelopment activities designed to deconcentrate poverty and expand housing and economic opportunities in census tracts with poverty concentrations greater than 20 percent, such as sites in:  A census tract in which the proposed PBV development will be located in a HUD- designated Enterprise Zone, Economic Community, or Renewal Community;  A census tract where the concentration of assisted units will be or has decreased as a result of public housing demolition and HOPE VI redevelopment;  A census tract in which the proposed PBV development will be located is undergoing significant revitalization as a result of state, local, or federal dollars invested in the area;  A census tract where new market rate units are being developed where such market rate units will positively impact the poverty rate in the area;  A census tract where there has been an overall decline in the poverty rate within the past five years; or  A census tract where there are meaningful opportunities for educational and economic advancement. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 179 of ? 4.7 Disability and Access Congress added protections against housing discrimination for persons with disabilities to the Fair Housing Act in 1988. In addition to protection against intentional discrimination and unjustified policies and practices with disproportionate effects, the Fair Housing Act includes three provisions that are unique to persons with disabilities. The Fair Housing Act prohibits the denial of requests for reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities if necessary, to afford an individual equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling. Reasonable accommodations are departures from facially neutral policies and are generally available if granting the accommodation request would not place an undue burden on the party providing the accommodation and where granting the accommodation request would not result in a direct threat to the health or safety of others. Permitting an individual with an anxiety disorder to have a dog in their rental unit as an emotional support animal despite a broad “no pets” policy is an example of a reasonable accommodation. The Act also prohibits the denial of reasonable modification requests. Modifications involve physical alterations to a unit, such as the construction of a ramp or the widening of a door frame, and must be paid for by the person requesting the accommodation unless the unit receives federal financial assistance and is subject to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Lastly, the design and construction provision of the Fair Housing Act requires most multi- family housing constructed since 1991 to have certain accessibility features. This section of the Analysis looks at the housing barriers faced by persons with disabilities, including those that result in the segregation of persons with disabilities in institutions and other congregate settings. Population Profile Geographic dispersal or concentration of people with disabilities, including in R/ECAPs and other segregated areas ACS Disability Information According to the 2016 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, 60,768 residents of Contra Costa County have ambulatory disabilities, which represents 5.9 percent of the County’s population; 3.1 percent of residents have hearing disabilities; and 1.9 percent have vision disabilities. The definition of ambulatory disabilities is “having serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.” People with ambulatory disabilities may not need a fully accessible unit, particularly if they do not use wheelchairs. They may require a unit on the ground floor or in an elevator building, perhaps with some architectural modifications. Therefore, ambulatory disabilities is not an accurate indicator of the number of accessible mobility units needed since people with ambulatory disabilities do not necessarily use wheelchairs. It should be noted that while these disability statistics are fairly consistent 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 180 of ? across the entitlement jurisdictions, compared to the County and the region, the greatest variation is among those with cognitive difficulty and ambulatory difficulty. The highest and lowest statistics for these disabilities have more than a two percent differential. The regional and County averages for ambulatory difficulties are both lower than any of the entitlements, suggesting that people with ambulatory difficulties are more likely to live in large cities where they may have more resources available. Approximately twenty-one percent (20.9 percent) of people with disabilities have incomes below the poverty line, as opposed to 13.1 percent of individuals without disabilities.374 Although a breakdown of poverty status by type of disability is not available through the American Community Survey (ACS), it is clear that the need for affordable housing is greater among people with disabilities than it is among people without disabilities. Another indicator of disability and limited income are the number of people receiving Supplemental Social Security (SSI) which is limited to people with disabilities. 26,494 Contra Costa County residents receive SSI which is such a small subsidy that all of the recipients are extremely low-income. Not all SSI recipients have the types of disabilities that necessitate accessible units. Concentration and Patterns People with disabilities in both the Region and the County tend to be concentrated in the areas of the greatest population density. Within the County, these areas include the bayside metropolitan area around Richmond, the cities to the north along the San Joaquin River such as Antioch, and the communities that run through the center of the County like Concord and Walnut Creek. However, while there is a correlation between areas of population density and areas where people with disabilities live, the relationship is far less apparent than one might expect. Viewing the regional maps (see appendix), there is a far clearer correlation between the population center of San Francisco and the residences of people with disabilities than in Contra Costa. The residences of people with disabilities are very evenly distributed throughout the County – even in the areas of the County that are generally more sparsely populated. Clear concentrations of people with disabilities are not visible on any of the maps. However, a comparison of the hard data (see appendix, Table 2) yields the conclusion that the R/ECAPs in Contra Costa (an expanded definition, see discussion in R/ECAPs section) have higher concentrations of people with disabilities than the general population of the County or the Region. The average proportions of persons with disabilities in the County and the Region are very comparable, with about three percent of people with hearing difficulty, two percent with 374 Lauer L. Kraus et al, 2017 Disability Statistics Annual Report, UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE (2018), https://disabilitycompendium.org/sites/default/files/user-uploads/2017_AnnualReport_2017_FINAL.pdf. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 181 of ? vision difficulty, 4-5 percent with cognitive difficulty, six percent with ambulatory difficulty, and two percent with self-care difficulty. However, in the R/ECAPs, the rates of disability are dramatically higher, with the exception of those with hearing difficulty. Variance in geographic patterns for people with each type of disability or for people with disabilities in different age ranges There are not clear patterns of population concentration when broken down by type of disability or different age ranges, except for inasmuch as people with disabilities tend to concentrate in the same places that the general population concentrates. Ambulatory difficulties and independent living difficulties present the highest statistics, which makes sense because they are disabilities which commonly develop with age. Cognitive disability is the third highest statistic, with slightly more clustering apparent, especially in the Richmond area. One pattern that remains apparent, even when dividing maps by type of disability and age range, is that people with disabilities in Contra Costa County are much more evenly distributed across the County than the general population. The central-west and central-east parts of the County, which are mostly rural and contain several state and regional parks, are nonetheless quite evenly inhabited by people with disabilities. This would imply that the rate of people with disabilities in these areas of lower population concentration is higher, percentagewise. Housing Accessibility Sufficiency of affordable, accessible housing in a range of unit sizes Accessibility Requirement for Federally-Funded Housing HUD’s implementation of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (24 CFR Part 8) requires that federally financed housing developments have five percent (5 percent) of total units be accessible to individuals with mobility disabilities and an additional two percent (2 percent) of total units be accessible to individuals with sensory disabilities. It requires that each property, including site and common areas, meet the Federal Uniform Accessibility Standards (UFAS) or HUD’s Alternative Accessibility Standard. Within Contra Costa County, there are 1,556 public housing units and 2,557 Project-Based Section 8 units that are subject to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Public Housing and Project Based Section 8 units are considered to be Publicly Supported Housing. About 34 percent of public housing residents have a disability, and 10 percent of Project-Based Section 8 residents have a disability. At this time, we don’t know how many accessible units are in public housing or among Project Based Section 8 units. Project Based Section 8 units are located in properties assisted by the County and/or the City of Richmond and in private properties with no County/Richmond financing. Those properties assisted by the 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 182 of ? County/Richmond are counted as part of Contra Costa County and Richmond HOME portfolios. The HOME Partnership Program is a grant of federal funds for housing. Therefore, these units are subject to Section 504. The majority of both the County and Richmond’s HOME funds were devoted to developing rental units. According to HOME statistics, Contra Costa has developed 1,181 rental units since 1992, and Richmond has developed an additional 184. In Contra Costa, 257 units are Section 504 compliant; 12 in Richmond. Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Units According to data from HUD’s LIHTC database, there are 9,809 low-income units in LIHTC- financed developments in Contra Costa County. However, many projects in the early years of the LIHTC were neither approved nor regulated by the City since the developer could apply directly to the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee (CTCAC). The question of whether Section 504 or Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to LIHTC developments has not been resolved by the courts. Title II of the ADA prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all service, programs, and activities provided to the public by non-federal governmental entities except transportation services. The 2010 ADA Standards (ADAS) differ from Section 504 in some respects but essentially, they contain the same types of requirements including the requirement for five percent mobility units and two percent hearing/vision units. However, in 2015, CTAC has issued guidance stating that the accessibility requirements of the California Building Code (CBC) for public housing (Chapter 11B) apply to LIHTC developments. Chapter 11B is the California equivalent of the 2010 ADA Standards. Section 1.9.1.2.1 of the CBC states that the accessibility requirements apply to “any building, structure, facility, complex …used by the general public.” Facilities made available to the public include privately owned buildings. CTAC has expanded the requirement so that 10 percent of total units in a LIHTC development must be accessible to people with mobility disabilities and that four percent be accessible to people with sensory (hearing/vison) disabilities. Also, effective 2015, CTCAC required that 50 percent of total units in a new construction project and 25 percent of all units in a rehabilitation project located on an accessible path will be mobility accessible units in accordance with CBC Chapter 11B. CTAC also provides incentives for developers to include additional accessible units through its Qualified Allocation Plan. Housing Choice Vouchers 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 183 of ? Twenty-four percent of people who utilize Housing Choice Vouchers in Contra Costa County have a disability. However, this does not represent a proxy for actual affordable, accessible units. Rather, Housing Choice Vouchers are a mechanism for bringing otherwise unaffordable housing, which may or may not be accessible, within reach of low-income people with disabilities. Unless another source of federal financial assistance is present, units assisted with Housing Choice Vouchers are not subject to Section 504, although participating landlords remain subject to the Fair Housing Act’s duty to provide reasonable accommodations and to allow tenants to make reasonable modifications at their own expense. Fair Housing Amendments Act Units The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (FHAA) covers all multifamily buildings of four or more units that were first occupied on or after March 13, 1991 – not just affordable housing developments. The FHAA added protections for people with disabilities and prescribed certain basic accessibility standards, such as having at least one accessible building entrance; there must be an accessible route throughout the development, and public rooms and common rooms must be accessible to people with disabilities. Although these accessibility requirements are not as intensive as those of Section 504, they were a first step in opening many apartment developments to people with disabilities regardless of income level. The FHAA was also very helpful for middle-income and upper-income people with disabilities also need accessible housing. It is important to note that FHAA units are not the same as accessible units under Section 504 or ADA Title II. Therefore, utilizing FHAA units as a proxy for the number of accessible housing units available or required under Section 504 or ADA Title II does not produce an accurate count. Although they are not fully accessible, these units are an important source of housing for people with disabilities who do not need a mobility or hearing/vision unit. Data breaking down affordable, accessible units by number of bedrooms is not available for private housing. For Publicly Supported Housing, nearly half (48 percent) of Project-Based Section 8 units are 0-1 bedroom units while public housing is spread much more evenly across bedroom sizes. In considering the overall distribution of publicly supported units by number of bedrooms, it is important to keep in mind that the number of Project-Based Section 8 units in Contra Costa is nearly 65 percent higher than the number of public housing units. Although data reflecting the percentage of families with children that include children with disabilities is not available, 4.1 percent of all children have a disability. If children with disabilities are evenly distributed across families with children, about 5,782 families in the County include a child with a disability. Data reflecting the distribution of Publicly Supported Housing units by type of Publicly Supported Housing and by number of bedrooms is not available at a regional level. Focusing on the region as opposed to the County-level makes it clear that the problem in more acute in the County. The proportion of the population that is comprised of people with 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 184 of ? disabilities is roughly similar to that of the County. For example, 5.4 percent of residents of the region have an ambulatory disability, and 2.7 percent of residents have a hearing disability, compared to 5.9 percent and 3.1 percent of County residents respectively. At the same time, both Publicly Supported Housing and multi-family housing, which are more likely to be accessible because of the requirements of Section 504 and the Fair Housing Act, are disproportionately concentrated along the eastern shores of the San Francisco Bay near Richmond, and in other population centers outside the County like Oakland and San Francisco. Many accessible, unsubsidized units are likely to be unaffordable to low-income households as relatively new private housing in the San Francisco Bay Area tends to be the most expensive housing. These trends are mirrored at the regional level. Overall, it is clear that the supply of affordable, accessible housing falls short of the level of need for such housing among people with disabilities in Contra Costa. Summary Overall, it is clear that the supply of affordable, accessible units in both the County and the region is insufficient to meet the need. Over 125,000 County residents have some level of need for accessible units, and, by the most generous, over-inclusive measures, there may be roughly 35,000 units that have been produced subject to the Fair Housing Act’s design and construction standards and approximately 1,500-2,000 units that must be accessible, subject to Section 504. There is, without question, some overlap between these two categories, some of these units are likely non-compliant, and some accessible units are occupied by individuals who do not have disabilities. Areas where affordable, accessible housing units are located and alignment with R/ECAPs or other segregated areas Please note that R/ECAPs are determined based on the national poverty line, which is often an inadequate measurement due to the high cost of living in the Bay Area. An expanded selection of R/ECAPs have been identified in the R/ECAPs section. In general, affordable housing is concentrated in the same places as the R/ECAPs in Contra Costa County, identified earlier in this analysis. The strongest concentrations are in the Iron Triangle area of Richmond and near a particular R/ECAP in Pittsburg. Although the concentration of affordable housing in the Monument Corridor area of Concord (which has three R/ECAPS) is higher than the surrounding area, it is still quite low in comparison to the R/ECAP areas of Richmond and Pittsburg. Curiously, there are some other areas of the County with high concentrations of affordable housing that do not align with the R/ECAPs in the Lamorinda and Danville areas. As these are less populous areas, this display on the HUD Data and Mapping Tool is probably driven by the large percentage of affordable housing in comparison to the smaller population in the area. It is also important to note that these are primarily senior developments. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 185 of ? Relying on local data regarding the accessibility of these buildings, 94 out of 264 affordable and/or moderately-priced housing options affirmatively tout themselves as having some accessibility for people with disabilities. Despite this low percentage, there are one or more affordable housing options in or near each of the identified R/ECAPs. Access of people with different disabilities to different categories of publicly supported housing In Contra Costa County, according to the 2012-2016 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, 11 percent of the civilian noninstitutionalized population has a disability. In the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metro Area, that figure is 9.9 percent. The American Community Survey does not facilitate the disaggregation of the population of people with disabilities by income in order to facilitate an assessment of what percentage of households that are income-eligible for Publicly Supported Housing include one or more people with disabilities. As Table 3 (see appendix) reflects, the proportion of people with disabilities in each category of Publicly Supported Housing, both in the County and in the region, far exceeds the overall population concentration of people with disabilities. The entitlement jurisdictions that have applicable statistics for these categories see a similar pattern. For Project-Based Section 8 and Other (HUD) Multifamily housing, however, the degree by which the percentage of occupants who are people with disabilities exceeds the representation of people with disabilities in the overall population is modest. The same is true of the entitlement jurisdictions, except for Concord which has a very small raw number of Other Multifamily residents that likely skews the results. In light of the socioeconomic disparities between people with disabilities discussed above, it is possible that the representation of people with disabilities in those categories of Publicly Supported Housing is merely at parity with or even lags representation in the income-eligible population. By contrast, with regard to Housing Choice Vouchers and Public Housing, it is clear that people with disabilities have robust access to these forms of Publicly Supported Housing and participate at levels that almost certainly exceed their proportion of the income-eligible population. With regard to public housing, in particular, the HUD-provided data may not accurately reflect the proportion of tenant households including people with disabilities. ACS data shows that 22.6 percent of households residing in public housing include one or more people with disabilities. The HUD AFFH Data & Mapping Tool does not include data reflecting the percentage of occupants of Housing Choice Voucher-assisted units who are people with disabilities in the entire region. By looking separately at data for the counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Mateo, and San Francisco and the cities of Berkeley, Daly City, Oakland, and Redwood City, which comprise the region, it is possible to develop a composite picture. In the region overall, 27.34 percent of HCB residents have disabilities. The consistency between the region and the County is reflective of a pattern of greater access to Housing Choice Vouchers than to 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 186 of ? other forms of Publicly Supported Housing among people with disabilities in the region, excepting Public Housing. This split is ironic in that other types of Publicly Supported Housing generally must comply with more intensive accessibility requirements than the units in which people with disabilities utilize vouchers. Integration of Persons with Disabilities Living in Institutions and Other Segregated Settings Extent to which persons with disabilities reside in segregated or integrated settings Up until a wave of policy reforms and court decisions in the 1960s and 1970s, states, including California, primarily housed persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities and individuals with psychiatric disabilities in large publicly-run institutions. In California, institutions for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities are called developmental centers, and institutions for persons with psychiatric disabilities are called state hospitals. Within these institutions, persons with disabilities have had few opportunities for meaningful interaction with individuals without disabilities, limited access to education and employment, and a lack of individual autonomy. The transition away from housing persons with disabilities in institutional settings and toward providing housing and services in home and community-based settings accelerated with the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act in 1991 and the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Olmstead v. L.C. in 1999. In Olmstead, the Supreme Court held that, under the regulations of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) implementing Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if a state or local government provides supportive services to persons with disabilities, it must do so in the most integrated setting appropriate to the needs of a person with a disability and consistent with their informed choice. This obligation is not absolute and is subject to the ADA defense that providing services in a more integrated setting would constitute a fundamental alteration of the state or local government’s programs. The transition from widespread institutionalization to community integration has not always been linear, and concepts of what comprises a home and community-based setting have evolved over time. Although it is clear that developmental centers and state hospitals are segregated settings and that an individual’s own house or apartment in a development where the vast majority of residents are individuals without disabilities is an integrated setting, significant ambiguities remain. Nursing homes and intermediate care facilities are clearly segregated though not to the same degree as state institutions. Group homes fall somewhere between truly integrated supported housing and such segregated settings, and the degree of integration present in group homes often corresponds to their size. Below, this analysis includes detailed information about the degree to which persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities and individuals with psychiatric disabilities reside in integrated or segregated settings. The selection of these two areas of focus does not mean 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 187 of ? that persons with other types of disabilities are never subject to segregation. Although the State of California did not operate analogous institutions on the same scale for persons with ambulatory or sensory disabilities, for example, many people with disabilities of varying types face segregation in nursing homes. Data concerning persons with various disabilities residing in nursing homes is not as available as data relating specifically to persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities and persons with psychiatric disabilities. Because city-level agencies play a limited role in meeting the need for home and community-based services, the analysis that follows is largely the same across Contra Costa County. In California, a system of regional centers is responsible for coordinating the delivery of supportive services primarily to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. The regional centers serve individuals with intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorder, epilepsy, and cerebral palsy. These disabilities may be co-occurring. Although there is some variation from regional center to regional center, individuals with intellectual disabilities and individuals with autism spectrum disorder predominate among this population. All data regarding the regional centers is drawn from their annual performance reports. In the region, there are two regional centers that perform this role. The Regional Center of the East Bay serves Contra Costa and Alameda Counties while the Golden Gate Regional Center serves Marin, San Francisco, and San Mateo Counties. Unfortunately, the Regional Center of the East Bay does not disaggregate its publicly reported data by county to allow a Contra Costa County-specific analysis. On an annual basis, these regional centers report to the California Department of Developmental Services on their performance in relation to benchmarks for achieving community integration of persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. As reflected in Table 4 (see appendix), the two regional centers in the region generally have higher rates of institutionalized consumers than is the case statewide. The main exception to this trend concerns the percentage of children living in large facilities which is slightly lower in the region than statewide and very low across both the region and the state. In some cases, disparities between the regional centers in the region and the state are very small and may not support an inference that structural factors are playing a particularly acute role in perpetuating the segregation of persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the region. The disparities appear to be the most significant with respect to residence in developmental centers and the opportunity for adults to live in home-based settings. The Sonoma Developmental Center, one of three remaining institutions for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities, is the primary developmental center serving the portion of the state including Contra Costa County. Its population is decreasing rapidly as California Department of Developmental Services prepares to close the facility at the end of 2018. As of June 27, 2018, its population was 83, down from 391 when the closure plan was announced in the fall of 2015 and a peak of well over a thousand. The remaining two facilities, the Fairview Developmental Center in Orange County and the Porterville Developmental 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 188 of ? Center in Tulare County, are scheduled to close at the end of 2021. Once the Sonoma Developmental Center is closed, the Porterville Developmental Center will be the closest large institution for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities to Contra Costa County. Residents leaving the closed facilities will transition into a range of community-based settings and get first priority for In Home Supportive Services (IHSS) if necessary. The Regional Center of the East Bay reports the number of individuals served by type of setting by race or ethnicity. The categories included are Home, Residential, ILS/SLS, Institutions, Med/Rehab/Psych, and Other. The category of Home includes the home of a parent or guardian, a foster home for children, and a family home for adults. The category of Residential includes community care facilities and intermediate care facilities (ICFs) and continuous nursing. The category of ILS/SLS solely includes independent living and supported living. Institutions include developmental centers, state hospitals, and correctional institutions. The category of Med/Rehab/Psych includes skilled nursing facilities, psychiatric treatment facilities, rehabilitation centers, sub-acute care, and community treatment facilities. The Other category includes individuals who are homeless as well as individuals who do not fall into any category (and one individual living outside of California). In general, Home and ILS/SLS settings are the most integrated, while Institutions and Med/Rehab/Psych are the most segregated. Residential settings fall somewhere in between with community care facilities being more integrated than ICFs within the category. Clearly, homelessness is not consistent with meaningful community integration. Table 5 (see appendix) reflects the percentage of individuals with intellectual or developmental disabilities served in each type of setting. In Contra Costa and Alameda Counties, Black residents are somewhat overrepresented in the population receiving services for intellectual and developmental disabilities as are individuals who are multi-racial or do not identify with a specific race. Non-Hispanic Whites are underrepresented in the population receiving services. With respect to individual types of settings, Black residents are overrepresented in Institutions and Other, which includes homelessness. This data suggests that, for Black individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, the effects of mass incarceration on their prospects for integration may be compounded by both race and disability status. At the same time, Black individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities appear to be able to access independent living and supported living environments, which are among the most integrated, at disproportionately high rates. Asian and Hispanic residents appear to access all types of settings except for Home settings at disproportionately low rates. Overall, this data shows that, within the County and the region, persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities are slightly less able to access community-based settings, than others statewide. The data shows that a significant minority of adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities, in particular, reside in comparatively segregated, congregate settings. It is highly likely that not all persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities who would like to live in integrated settings in the County, the Cities of Concord, Antioch, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek, and the region have the opportunity to do so. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 189 of ? Psychiatric Disabilities Napa State Hospital is the primary large institution for individuals with psychiatric disabilities serving the part of California including Contra Costa County. As of November 2016, the facility had 1,267 patients, slightly over its official capacity of 1,255 beds. The hospital’s website breaks down the patient population among four categories of admittees. 47 percent were committed by virtue of being found not guilty of a crime by reason of insanity. 30 percent were committed because they had been found incompetent to stand trial. 17 percent were civilly committed. Lastly, six percent were classified as mentally disordered offenders. Thus, a significant majority of individuals with psychiatric disabilities institutionalized within Northern California resided in institutions because of contact with the criminal justice. The Department of State Hospitals does not disaggregate publicly available data about patients by county of origin nor does it disaggregate detailed demographic data about patients by hospital. Nonetheless, some system-wide information is useful. Across California, those institutionalized in state hospitals are disproportionally male (87 percent), Black (25 percent), and have low levels of educational attainment (79 percent lack a high school diploma). This data is consistent with the fact that the criminal justice system is the primary gateway into the state hospital system. 20 percent of patients come from a seven-county definition of the Bay Area region including Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Sonoma Counties.375 The most common diagnosis for patients (40 percent) is schizophrenia followed by schizoaffective disorder (24 percent). Interventions, like the Multi-systemic Therapy for Juvenile Offenders supported by Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services, that target needed non-punitive services to children and transition-age youth in overpoliced, disproportionately Black communities in the County and the Region, could advance efforts to reduce the institutionalization of persons with psychiatric disabilities in state hospitals, jails, and prisons. Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services is responsible for coordinating the provision of supportive services for persons with psychiatric disabilities in Contra Costa County and the Cities of Concord, Antioch, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. Though the agency provides or coordinates the provision of needed services and housing in integrated settings, it also assists some more segregated efforts. These include augmented board and care homes, some of which are quite large with as many as 80 beds at the Crestwood Healing Center in Pleasant Hill. Gradually phasing out the use of board and care homes and reducing their scale while increasing the availability of supportive housing, with intensive services and supports if needed and chosen by the consumer, would increase the integration of persons with psychiatric disabilities in Contra Costa County. 375 Normally, the Bay Area follows a nine-county definition (including Solano and Santa Clara), but the seven- county definition is used above. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 190 of ? Range of options for persons with disabilities to access affordable housing and supportive services Intellectual Disabilities The primary payment streams for supportive services coordinated by the Regional Center of the East Bay include Home and Community-Based Services Waivers and the 1915(i) State Plan Amendment, which funds services to individuals who do not meet the criteria for Home and Community-Based Services Waivers. These Medicaid-funded options provide individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, including those with intensive needs, with the services and supports to facilitate community living. The types of settings in which individuals who receive these services reside vary. In a 2017 report, the Regional Center of the East Bay looked at a sample of 75 individuals receiving Home and Community-Based Waiver Services. 29 were living in independent or supported living environments, 17 were living with family, and 29 were living in less integrated community care facilities. Although most individuals were in truly integrated settings, a significant minority resided in congregate settings, albeit ones that may operate at a small scale. According to a 2017 report from the Kaiser Family Foundation, a lower percentage of potential beneficiaries for Section 1115 Managed Long-Term Services and Supports Waivers, just eight percent, were residing in institutional settings in advance of receiving community-based services than in other states operating that program. Additionally, California served a far larger number of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities – 500,000 – than did other states. Although a gap for fulling meeting the needs of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities remains, it is comparatively small in national context. One important gap in the provision of supportive services that applies to both individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and to individuals with psychiatric disabilities is that undocumented people are not eligible for federal Medicaid-funded services. State and local solutions are needed to help meet these needs. There are relatively limited housing resources targeted to persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the County. One recent development, Tabora Gardens Senior Apartments, which received support from the County, the City of Antioch, and the Housing Authority of Contra Costa County, has five Section 811 Project Rental Assistance units for which it receives referrals from the Regional Center of the East Bay. Another recent project, Arboleda (formerly Third Avenue Apartments) in Walnut Creek has 15 out of 48 units reserved for people with developmental disabilities. There are also Section 811 units for which service providers for intellectual and developmental disabilities provide referrals in nearby parts of Alameda and Solano Counties. Beyond those resources, housing assistance for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities is largely limited to generally available affordable housing resources and resources for which there are priorities for all people with disabilities. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 191 of ? Psychiatric Disabilities Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services is responsible for coordinating the provision of supportive services for persons with psychiatric disabilities in Contra Costa County and the Cities of Concord, Antioch, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. The Department operates a range of programs serving adults, children, older adults, and transitional age youth, in addition to its cross-cutting activities. The primary programs specifically geared toward meeting the needs of individuals who are at risk of institutionalization are the Full Service Partnerships. The Department divides the County into three service areas, west County, central County, and east County. Through the Full Service Partnerships, Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services serves 201 children per year, 100 transition age youth ranging from 16 to 25 years old, and 190 adults. Additional programs funded through Full Service Partnerships reach more consumers across age classifications. These include Assisted Outpatient Treatment and Wellness and Recovery Centers, among others. Based on input gathered through the community participation process, it appears there is a wider gap between available funding for intensive services and supports for people with psychiatric disabilities and the existing need than there is for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Although the onus of closing that gap falls primarily on the State of California, local government can play a role in supporting efforts to increase the availability of resources and in convening partners working toward the shared goal of closing the resource gap. By contrast, with respect to housing for persons with psychiatric disabilities, far more targeted resources exist than for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services supports residential programs with Mental Health Services Act funds. These include both congregate and integrated settings. Specifically, Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services has funded a 16-bed crisis residential facility; a 16-bed facility for transition age youth in Concord; 119 units of integrated, master-leased supportive housing through Shelter, Inc. countywide; augmented board and care homes of various sizes throughout the County; approximately 75 shelter beds; and 50 units to date of permanent, integrated housing set aside within affordable housing developments throughout the County. California’s No Place Like Home program additionally dedicates up to $2 billion in bond proceeds to the development of permanent supportive housing. Nevertheless, the number of individuals with psychiatric disabilities experiencing homelessness, incarceration, or residence in congregate facilities suggests that there is unmet need for supportive housing for that population. Disparities in Access to Opportunity Major barriers to access for people with disabilities 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 192 of ? Government services and facilities People with auditory and speech disabilities face significant barriers in accessing emergency services. It takes an estimated three to eight minutes for individuals to be connected via relay services compared to a national standard of being connected within ten seconds for at least 90 percent of emergency calls. This lag has the potential to endanger people with disabilities and their property when threatened by criminal behavior or fire. It can also result in people with disabilities receiving needed medical care in a less timely fashion than individuals without disabilities. Contra Costa County and the other entitlement jurisdictions have devoted substantial CDBG funds to making accessibility modifications to a variety of public facilities. In its 2015-2016 Annual Action Plan, Contra Costa County included $60,000 in funding for accessibility modifications as needed to all public housing developments. Antioch devoted $100,000 to rehabilitating homes, including making necessary accessibility retrofits. Concord devoted $263,000 to ADA improvements, and Walnut Creek pledged CDBG funds toward accessibility modifications for their senior center. From parks and recreation facilities to government office buildings, maintaining accessible government facilities is essential to efforts to reduce segregation by increasing opportunities for people with disabilities to interact with individuals without disabilities and to advance the economic empowerment of people with disabilities through employment opportunities and access to public benefits. Public infrastructure (e.g., sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, pedestrian signals) There is no comprehensive reporting on accessible sidewalks and curb cuts in the County and various municipalities. An accessibility lawsuit settled in 2009 regarding the lack of curb cuts and other accessibility features in Antioch, Brentwood, Concord, Danville, El Cerrito, Martinez, Moraga, Orinda, Pinole, Pittsburg, Pleasant Hill, Richmond, San Pablo, and Walnut Creek. The settlement directed the cities to dedicate at least five percent of gas tax revenues for up to 30 years to ADA Advisory Committee Accounts which would install curb ramps, audible pedestrian signals, and other accessibility features. Beyond curb ramps, the problem of uneven sidewalks becomes worrisome for wheelchair users, as the maintenance and repair of curbs and sidewalks is the responsibility of individual property owners. As it is individual property owners who are responsible for repairs, cities most likely do not have comprehensive records, or even knowledge, of problem areas within their purview. This may allow for sidewalks to remain in disrepair, virtually unchecked – posing great difficulties for wheelchair users. Transportation City bus service is provided by four major companies in Contra Costa, and the area is also serviced by two rail systems, BART and Amtrak. All of these companies allow service animals, and advertise that they are ADA-compliant and wheelchair accessible. There are also five 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 193 of ? paratransit providers across the County. It has been proposed by Contra Costa County’s Department of Conservation and Development that more timely and efficient paratransit service could be provided by a collaborative between these companies and a single app to coordinate pickups and routes. The wheelchair accessibility of the train and bus services is fairly standard across providers, but accessibility for people with visual disabilities varies. While AC Transit and WestCAT have automated or driver stop announcements, County Connection merely provides “us identification kits,” meant to alert and encourage surrounding passengers to identify and assist people with visual disabilities, and Tri Delta Transit has automated announcement on newer vehicles and an informal policy of asking boarding passengers if they need assistance on older vehicles. Tri Delta Transit also acknowledges that while wheelchair lifts are capable of being deployed at every bus stop, some stops are “a little difficult.” Proficient schools and educational programs Children with disabilities seem fairly spread-out across the County’s residential areas. However, there is not a consistent concentration of children with disabilities across the various school districts, and even individual schools. About 10 percent of the individual public schools in Contra Costa County have an IDEA-enrollment376 of five percent or below, with 12 of those schools (out of 26) having zero percent IDEA-enrollment. This is in stark contrast to the national average of 13 percent IDEA-enrollment, to which the County statistics as a whole adhere. Notably, four of the nine schools in the Martinez Unified School District have five percent or below IDEA enrollment. This raises the question of whether these schools push out students with disabilities, or alternatively, whether officials are failing in their Child Find obligations to identify students with disabilities and provide them with the services necessary to facilitate effective learning. Finally, a comparison of the percentage of IDEA students enrolled at large versus the percentage of out-of-school suspended students who were also IDEA-classified shows that students with disabilities are punished at twice the rate as other students. Although troubling, this is also consistent with the national average. Jobs People with disabilities do not seem to experience pronounced difficulties in accessing gainful employment in Contra Costa County or the broader region. According to the 2011-2013 American Community Survey 3-Year Estimates, of the civilian noninstitutionalized population aged 18-64, 43 percent of people with disabilities in the Region were in the labor force, and of those, 83 percent were employed. The results in the County are roughly equivalent, with 43 percent of people with disabilities in the labor force, and 81 percent of them employed. The entitlement jurisdiction statistics are much more varied (see below). However, all of this is in sharp contrast to other areas of California, such as Los Angeles, where just 25.5 percent of 376 Students who qualify under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 194 of ? noninstitutionalized people with disabilities age 16 and over in the City were in the labor force with only 20.9 percent employed. Data from the regional centers is reflective of the difficulties faced by individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities in securing gainful employment in Contra Costa. There is only one regional center serving the area. Data from that regional center speaks to whether people with intellectual and developmental disabilities have access to integrated employment, whether that employment is truly remunerative, and the degree to which the service planning process for individuals is identifying integrated employment as a goal. The regional center data is very comparable to the state average, with one promising exception. Only 42 percent of adults in the area earn below minimum wage, compared to 53 percent statewide. Performance in the other key indicators is slightly below average, with a 2.5 percent differential in consumers with earned income, a three percent differential in adults with paid jobs in a community-based setting, a six percent differential in adults with integrated employment as a goal in their IPP, and a four percent differential in unemployed adults that want a job in the community. Processes for people with disabilities to request and obtain reasonable accommodations and accessibility modifications Government services and facilities Contra Costa County has a Disability Program, which aims to increase the participation of applicants and employees with disabilities in County government. Employees may request reasonable accommodations by contacting their supervisor, department ADA Coordinator, or the Risk Management ADA Coordinator. The County emphasizes the ADA’s role in regulating its own employment practices much more than requesting reasonable accommodations for County residents, and there is almost not readily available information about ADA accommodations for County events and the like. The city and town governments in Contra Costa have their own accommodation systems. The easy accessibility of this information varies widely across the various municipality systems, but the entitlement jurisdictions do not seem to have easily accessible resources for accommodations in city government employment or for attending city events. Public infrastructure (e.g. sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, pedestrian signals) Contra Costa County’s Public Works Department upgrades and installs curb ramps throughout the County, and provides a curb ramp request form online,377 as do some cities 377 Curb Ramp Program/ADA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/385/Curb-Ramp- Program-ADA. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 195 of ? within the County.378 Conversely, individual residents must make their own repairs (i.e. hire a contractor) to damaged or uneven sidewalks on their property. Transportation City bus service is provided by four major companies in Contra Costa, and the area is also serviced by two rail systems, BART and Amtrak. Each of these services have dedicated accessibility pages easily found on their websites. There are also five paratransit providers across the County. It has been proposed by Contra Costa County’s Department of Conservation and Development that more timely and efficient paratransit service could be provided by a collaborative between these companies and a single app to coordinate pickups and routes. Uber, an app-based ride-hailing service, has a dedicated, easily found Accessibility page on its website. The page describes the efforts that the company undertakes to serve people with disabilities. The site does not, however, inform users of how they can request accommodations and characterizes the obligation to comply with disability rights laws as falling on Uber drivers as independent contractors rather than on the company itself. Lyft, another app-based ride-hailing service, does not have a dedicated page describing its efforts to ensure accessibility, instead burying such information on ambiguous webpages, including its general anti-discrimination page and pages specific to service animals and wheelchairs. It does have a page dedicated to ordering an accessible ride, and links to other service providers where accessible vehicles are not available. Proficient schools and educational programs There are 19 public school districts in Contra Costa County, in addition to 124 private schools and 19 charters schools. The presence (and easy location) of a dedicated page for a school’s Educational Equity Compliance Office varies wildly across websites. Similarly, information about making accommodation requests and appeal denials of such requests varies across the different platforms. Many school websites also lack easy-to-find accessibility tabs. Jobs The Contra Costa County Personnel Department’s website doesn’t seem to have a dedicated webpage addressing how the Department receives and processes reasonable accommodation requests. Searches for “accommodation” will yield copies of a reasonable accommodation request form (which are not searchable pdfs), a fill-in webform, and an eight-page policy document. These documents are not in searchable pdf form, meaning “Ctrl-F” will not allow searches for a particular word, which may cause problems for people with low vision. Nor do 378 See, e.g. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), CITY OF RICHMOND, http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/2526/Americans-with-Disabilities-Act-ADA. However, none of the entitlement jurisdictions (Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, Walnut Creek) seem to have a similar request form readily available. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 196 of ? the other entitlement jurisdictions have easily accessible accommodation requests information on their personnel websites. The availability of information about private sector employers’ reasonable accommodation policies is uneven. In Contra Costa County, the largest private sector employer is Chevron Corp. Other large private sector employers include medical centers and insurance agencies such as Kaiser Permanente, John Muir Medical Center, Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Bio-Rad Laboratories, and Martinez Medical Offices. Other Chevron-affiliated companies make up the other large employers, as well as Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) and Uss-Posco Industries. Since many Contra Costa residents commute into San Francisco, it may be useful to discuss large San Francisco employers as well. In addition to those already listed, Hewlett Packard, Applied Materials Inc., and Accenture are among the largest employers in the larger area. Kaiser Permanente has an easily locatable link to information for potential job applicants with disabilities on the front page of its Jobs website. The Disability page includes well organized information about the company’s commitment to hiring people with disabilities and the process for requesting reasonable accommodations. Chevron Corp, Applied Materials, Accenture, and BART have easy-to-find accessibility tabs that instructs those requesting reasonable accommodations to send an email detailing their request. The other top employers lack meaningful or easy-to-find accommodations information. Disproportionate Housing Needs Disproportionate housing needs experienced by people with disabilities and by people with certain types of disabilities As with mortgage lending disparities, limited data is available on the extent to which people with disabilities face disproportionate housing needs. The American Community Survey does not disaggregate data relating to overcrowding, incomplete plumbing and kitchen facilities, and cost burden by disability status. Given the age distribution of people with disabilities, it would seem to be unlikely that people with disabilities are disproportionately subject to overcrowding. Just 1.0 percent of households with elderly heads of household are overcrowded while 5.7 percent of households with nonelderly heads of household are overcrowded. By contrast, in light of the relatively low earnings of people with disabilities, it is likely that people with disabilities are disproportionately subject to cost burden and severe cost burden. Disability and Access Issues Contributing Factors 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 197 of ? Access for persons with disabilities to proficient schools Access for persons with disabilities to proficient schools is a significant contributing factor to segregation of people with disabilities. There are 261 public schools within 19 public school districts in Contra Costa County. There are also 124 private schools and 19 charters schools in Contra Costa County. Analysis of these schools’ performances in educating students with disabilities is based upon the performance of public schools, as only public schools are required to report such information. Since the passage of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act in 1990, there have been 67 administrative law judge decisions regarding violations of the IDEA in Contra Costa County public schools. These decisions seem evenly spread out between 1990 and 2017, and proportionate to the number of students enrolled, with no glaring inequities. Parents unsatisfied with results of their ALJ due process hearing are free to appeal it to U.S. District Court. There have been 19 IDEA lawsuits against Contra Costa County public school districts, about half of which have been appealed from such ALJ hearings.379 The U.S. Department of Education Office of Civil Rights compiles data about disability and student discipline in public schools.380 According to the National Center for Education Statistics, in the 2014-2015 school year, the average percentage of IDEA-classified students enrolled in any given public school was 13 percent.381 During the 2013-2014 school year, the average percentage of IDEA-classified students in Contra Costa County public schools was 12.7 percent, in keeping with the national average. A comparison of the percentage of IDEA students enrolled at large versus the percentage of out-of-school suspended students who were also IDEA-classified shows that students with disabilities are punished at twice the rate as other students.382 Although troubling, this is also consistent with the national average.383 Several Contra Costa County schools stand out for their low IDEA enrollment. A comparison across the 2013-2014 and 2011-2012 data sets show that in one or both of these years, 26 public schools384 had an IDEA classification rate of five percent or below, with 12 of those 379 The other half were either brought independently, or the ALJ decision is not available for public access. See Special Education Decisions and Orders, CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS, http://www.dgs.ca.gov/oah/SpecialEducation/searchDO.aspx. 380 Civil Rights Data Collection: Discipline Report, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, https://ocrdata.ed.gov/DataAnalysisTools/DataSetBuilder?Report=6. 381 Children and Youth with Disabilities, NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS, https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgg.asp. 382 Across all Contra Costa County schools, the IDEA students make up 12.6% of the population, but 24.8% of out-of-school suspended students. 383 Civil Rights Data Collection, Data Snapshot: School Discipline, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS (Mar. 2014), http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/rulesforengagement/CRDC%20School%20Discipline%20Snapshot.pdf . “Students with disabilities are more than twice as likely to receive an out-of-school suspension (13%) than students without disabilities (6%).” Id. 384 Approximately 10% of Contra Costa County public schools. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 198 of ? schools having zero percent IDEA students. Most notably, four of the nine schools in the Martinez Unified School District have five percent or below IDEA enrollment. As the national average is 13 percent, these low percentages raise the question of whether these schools push out students with disabilities, or alternatively, whether officials are failing in their Child Find obligations to identify students with disabilities and provide them with the services necessary to facilitate effective learning. Although the amount of ALJ decisions and IDEA lawsuits seems proportionate to the enrollments of the various school districts, a survey of the disabilities of the students who filed complaints may give insight into particular failings of the school districts to provide effective special education. The most highly represented disabilities in these complaints are autism385 and ADD/ADHD.386 Notably, San Ramon Valley Unified School District has had eight IDEA lawsuits/ALJ decisions regarding students with autism,387 and Mt. Diablo Unified school district has had nine IDEA lawsuits/ALJ decisions regarding students with ADD/ADHD.388 It is also significant that two of the three complaints against Antioch Unified School District have involved diseases with chronic symptoms, suggesting that the school’s ability to accommodate chronic absence and fatigue is lacking.389 In addition to concerns over disability education, some Contra Costa County public schools have also had budget problems, with predictable results on the suitability of their facilities.390 In 2012, the ACLU sued the West Contra Costa Unified School District over the conditions in Richmond’s Community Day School.391 The complaint alleged that the school had no electricity, or heat, and had leaky ceilings, insufficient desks and chairs, rat and feral cat feces, and mushrooms growing out of the floors. Students were escorted to a nearby high school to use the restroom, and the school had no regular math or science teacher. All of this was particularly troubling, as the school served some of the district’s most at-risk students. Access to publicly supported housing for persons with disabilities Access to publicly supported housing for persons with disabilities is a significant contributing factor for segregation of people with disabilities. Contra Costa County has three housing authorities.392 Each of these housing authorities implement both Public Housing and Section 385 17 separate complaints. 386 26 separate complaints 387 Of 19 total. 388 Of 19 total. 389 The diseases at issue were Hashimoto’s disease and multiple sclerosis. 390 See Cash -Strapped Richmond Schools Ask IBM to Forgive Debt, FOX RENO (June 20, 2007), http://archive.li/0jvlp. 391 Palmer v. West Contra Costa Unified School District, available at https://www.aclunc.org/sites/default/files/west_contra_costa_county_school_complaint.pdf . 392 A county-wide housing authority, and separate housing authorities for the cities of Richmond and Pittsburg. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, http://www.contracostahousing.org/index.htm; https://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/86/Housing-Authority; http://www.ci.pittsburg.ca.us/index.aspx?page=150. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 199 of ? 8 programs. Contra Costa County also runs a family self-sufficiency program for Section 8 participants who want to become independent of public assistance.393 Eligibility standards for the Section 8 and Public Housing programs are set by HUD. Eligible persons may enter their name onto a public housing waitlist. As of December 6th, 2017, the Contra Costa County, City of Pittsburg, and City of Richmond waitlists are currently closed.394 Listings of public housing options are accessible on each of the Housing Authorities’ websites. Additionally, the Housing Authority websites offer lists of affordable and/or subsidized housing options throughout the County.395 These lists contain at least one “affordable” housing option in every major community in the County except for Moraga and Alamo. However, traditional public housing is only available in Antioch, Bay Point, Brentwood, Martinez, Oakley, Pittsburg, Richmond, Rodeo, and San Pablo.396 People seeking housing that is accessible to those with disabilities face significant challenges both because of the number of accessible options and because of the lack of information addressing accessibility. Only a few apartment-listing websites can be consistently relied upon to list whether a property is accessible.397 This forces apartment-searchers to make individual inquiries, making it much more time-consuming. It also makes it difficult to estimate the number of disability-accessible properties in the area.398 Based on publicly These Housing Authorities are funded by and subject to the rules and guidelines of HUD. About Us, CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/221/About-Us. The Housing Authorities also receive funding for site/development revitalization and capital improvements. Id. 393 Housing Choice Voucher: Family Self-Sufficiency, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, http://www.contracostahousing.org/hcvfss.htm. 394 Las Deltas Relocation Plan, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, http://www.contracostahousing.org/ph.htm; http://www.ci.pittsburg.ca.us/index.aspx?page=152; Wait List/Eligibility, CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/231/Wait-ListEligibility. The City of Richmond waitlist was open from November 27, 2017 at 8:00 AM until December 1, 2017 at 4:00 PM. Id. 395 See, e.g., CCC Affordable Rental Units, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/28332 (last updated July 2017); PITTSBURG HOUSING AUTHORITY: HOUSING LOCATOR, http://pca.gosection8.com/; CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY: HOUSING LOCATOR, http://contracosta.gosection8.com/; Contra Costa County Multi Family List, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, http://www.contracostahousing.org/Documents/HCV/Contra%20Costa%20County%20Multi%20Family%20L ist.pdf. There is significant overlap between each of these lists, and there doesn’t seem to be any centralized, comprehensive listing. These listings also lack a standardized waitlist procedure. Affordable Housing, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/4807/Affordable-Housing (“Please call each building manager for the application or waiting list procedures”). 396 Public Housing Developments, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, http://www.contracostahousing.org/phdevelopments.htm. 397 See, e.g., APARTMENTS.COM, www.apartments.com; FORRENT.COM, www.forrent.com; HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, www.contracostahousing.org; GOSECTION8, www.gosection8.com. Of these websites, only gosection8.com specifically denotes the lack of accessible features; the other websites do not address accessibility on the webpage at all if it is not a feature of the property. 398 Listings for Contra Costa County Section 8 housing constantly change, as individual landlords list properties and remove advertisements after the units are rented. Contra Costa County, CA, GOSECTION8, https://www.gosection8.com/Section-8-housing-in-Contra%20Costa%20County-CA/. There does not seem to be a comprehensive list of Section 8 properties (available and unavailable). 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 200 of ? available information (without making individual inquiries), 94 out of 264 affordable housing options are accessible. Based on the same information, at least one accessible housing option is available in each city, town, or large community in the County, excepting Alamo and Moraga. Each of these accessible housing units is located near a public bus stop, ranging in distance from 171 feet to 0.5 miles away.399 Access to transportation for persons with disabilities Access to transportation for persons with disabilities is a major contributing factor for segregation of people with disabilities. There are 27 major cities, towns, and unincorporated communities in Contra Costa County with city bus service400 and ADA Paratransit401 for people with physical disabilities.402 Twenty-eight localities have volunteer transportation services,403 and twelve communities also have community-based transportation, which mostly services senior citizens.404 Twelve communities have city-based providers with door to door or curb to curb service for the elderly and disabled residents of the city.405 City bus service is provided by four major companies, and all advertise that they allow service animals, and are ADA-compliant and wheelchair accessible.406 All take some action to alert visually-impaired passengers of stops, with varied reliability.407 Those with qualifying 399 Excepting some outliers. For full details, see spreadsheet. The id eal walking distance for public transportation stops is 0.25 miles. Jarrett Walker, Basics: Walking Distance to Transit, HUMAN TRANSIT (Apr. 24, 2011), http://humantransit.org/2011/04/basics-walking-distance-to-transit.html. 400 Provided by County Connection, Tri Delta Transit, WestCAT, and AC Transit. All nineteen cities and towns, and eight out of twenty-four unincorporated communities are covered by this bus servic e. 401 Provided by County Connection LINK, Tri Delta Transit’s Dial-A-Ride, WestCAT Dial-A-Ride, East Bay Paratransit, and Rossmoor Paratransit. One-way fares range across the different providers, and depending on distance: $2.75-$7.00 (Tri Delta Transit), $4-$10 (East Bay Paratransit), $4 (County Connection; companions also cost $4), $1.25-$3.00 (WestCAT); Rossmoor Paratransit is free to Rossmoor Senior Community residents. 402 27 census-designated places in Contra Costa County are not accounted for in this list. 403 Provided by Seniors Around Town, Mobility Matters, and Caring Hands: John Muir Health. These services are restricted to seniors, except for Seniors Around Town, which does accept people under 65 if they have a medical condition that limits their driving. Transportation Resource Guide: City Based Providers, WAY TO GO CONTRA COSTA, http://www.waytogocc.com/services_type.php?id=3#descprov_15. 404 Provided by Antioch Senior Bus Program, Concord Senior Transportation Project, El Cerrito Senior Center (for shopping trips), Hercules Senior Center (for shopping trips), Lamorinda Senior Transportation Project, The Orinda Association’s Seniors Around Town, Homebound (Pinole Senior Center), Pleasant Hill Senior Van Service, Richmond Paratransit Program, Subsidized Paratransit Tickets (for East Bay Paratransit), Senior Express Van, Rossmoor/Golden Rain Foundation, and Walnut Creek Seniors’ Club Mini Bus Service. “Way to Go, Contra Costa!” A Guide to Transportation Resources in Contra Costa County, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AGING & ADULT SERVICES (Summer 2005), http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/4478. 405 Provided by Rossmoor Bus, Walnut Creek Senior’s Club Mini-Bus, Senior Express Van, San Pablo Senior Transportation, R-Transit, Pleasant Hill Senior Van Service, Lamorinda Spirit Van, El Cerrito Easy Ride, and G et Around Taxi Program. Transportation Resource Guide: City Based Providers, WAY TO GO CONTRA COSTA, http://www.waytogocc.com/services_type.php?id=3#descprov_15. 406 However, Tri Delta Transit acknowledges that while buses are capable of deploying the lift at all stops, some stops are a little difficult. (Conversation with “Mary” at Tri Delta Transit, 925-754-4040). 407 WestCAT has an automated system which announces stops. AC Transit announces stops at transfer points and major intersections via automated system or verbally by the driver. Tri Delta has an automated system on 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 201 of ? disability may apply for a Regional Transit Connection Discount ID Card, allowing them to access discounted fares on all of the regional bus companies that service Contra Costa County.408 Rail service is provided by BART (Bay Area Regional Transit), which has ten stations in the County. All platforms have accessible elevators, and passengers in wheelchairs can board directly from the platform onto the train, but must pay special attention to the small gap.409 However, BART has had extensive problems with making the promise of accessibility a reality, with a 2017 lawsuit alleging a proliferation of broken elevators and inaccessible stations.410Service animals are permitted, and operators announce station names and transfer information for vision-impaired passengers. Paratransit options are available through collaboration with County Connection LINK and Tri Delta Transit in the form of lift vans and sedans, operating by reservation only.411 Rail service is also available through Amtrak in Martinez and Richmond, and fares are reduced 15 percent for seniors (age 62+). According to John Cunningham’s (Principal Planner, Contra Costa County Dept. of Conservation and Development) 2017 report, one of the main challenges in championing accessible transportation is the idea that improvements are likely to increase demand, which will increase expenses.412 The report notes that riders who may be eligible for paratransit are disqualified by technicalities in an effort to curb these costs. Another challenge comes with over-confidence in new transportation options, like Uber and Lyft.413 Not only are they less reliable than projected, but they pose an additional challenge to elderly and disabled customers who may struggle to adapt to constantly changing technology. The report newer vehicles, and most drivers ask where passengers are headed upon boarding, and will advise disable d passengers when to disembark (Informal Policy, conversation with ‘Mary” at Tri Delta Transit, 925-754-4040). County Connection provides ‘Bus identification kits”, which are print-outs displaying bus routes and destinations, meant to “alert the bus driver and encourage other sighted passengers to let the rider know when the correct bus is approaching the stop.” Accessibility, COUNTY CONNECTION, https://countyconnection.com/how- to-ride/accessibility/. 408 Discounted fares vary from company to company. County Connection (senior and disability cash fares are half-price), Tri Delta Transit (senior and disability fares are approximately half price), AC Transit (senior and disability cash fares are approximately half price, monthly passes are approximately 1/3 price), WestCAT (senior and disability cash fares are less than half price) 409 Wheelchair or Limited Mobility, BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, https://www.bart.gov/guide/accessibility/mobility. 410 Erin Baldassari, Lawsuit: BART’s Filthy, Broken Elevators Violate Civil Rights for People with Disabilities , THE MERCURY NEWS (Apr. 5, 2017), https://www.mercurynews.com/2017/04/05/lawsuit -barts-filthy-broken- elevators-violate-civil-rights-for-people-with-disabilities/. 411 Paratransit Service, BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT, http://www.bart.gov/guide/accessibility/paratransit. 412 Accessible Transportation in Contra Costa County, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (Sept. 19, 2017), http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/47102. 413 A somewhat dated report notes that paratransit options like uberWAV and uberASSIST are far less numerous and convenient than projected. Heather Kelly, Uber’s Services for the Disabled Lack Actual Cars, CNN BUSINESS (May 3, 2016), http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/02/technology/uber-access/. There have also been lawsuits in Jackson, Mississippi, New York City, and Chicago due to this lack of accessible vehicles. Megan Rose Dickey, Uber Faces Another Lawsuit Due to a Lack of Wheelchair -Accessible Rides, TECH CRUNCH (July 18, 2017), https://techcrunch.com/2017/07/18/uber-accessibility-lawsuit-new-york/. Additional inquiries should be made with local advocates and within the community about the reliability of such services in the area. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 202 of ? proposed a large-scale, coordinated paratransit system with specialized one-click, one-call software; this would eliminate administrative complexities and maximize efficiency between passengers from different localities, and cut costs. Contra Costa County has recently partnered with TransLoc to create a county-wide microtransit system that will help link less-served areas in the County to the existing bus and rail systems.414 It is similar to Uber and Lyft in that you can use an app to hail transportation wherever you are. The difference is that you will likely share the vehicle (which will probably be a large van) with other passengers, and the destination will be a bus or rail stop, rather than your final destination. It will also be cheaper than Uber or Lyft, with the goal being integration into the larger public transit system. Inaccessible government facilities or services Inaccessible government facilities or services is a major contributing factor for segregation of people with disabilities. On a positive note, there are 29 locations affiliated with the Contra Costa County Public Library.415 All library locations have large screen monitors, large print keyboards, trackball mouses, 20/20 pens, signature guides, 3x handheld magnifiers, headphones/covers, ZoomText, NVDA Text-to-Speech, and T-Bars (Color Preferences and Screen Masking Ruler). The website also lists individual locations that have additional tools and resources such as video magnifiers, hearing assistive technology (HAT), Kurzweil software, and rollators (rolling walkers). The public library offers a wealth of accessibility resources and services, including reading programs, delivery services (for homebound readers), a special collection of books about teens with disabilities, job search resources for people with disabilities, a list of community resources, an Information and Assistance (I&A) helpline, braille and digital talking books exchange with the California State Library, and more. While the Contra Costa County public libraries provide very strong resources for people with disabilities, the technological accessibility of the larger government is lacking, and the comparison throws these inadequacies into sharp relief. Of the 19 incorporated cities and towns, only eight have accessibility tabs on their websites. These webpages are nearly identical, as are the website formats – they were likely created from the same template. Though identical, the webpages are largely uninformative, primarily citing the statutes and regulations that govern accessibility and providing a feedback mechanism for people encountering additional website accessibility problems. There is a startling lack of TTY numbers (for deaf or hard of hearing people) listed on any of the government websites for Contra Costa County municipalities. When searching for TTY numbers on individual government websites, a smattering of results are returned, although 414 Erin Baldassari, East Bay Bus Agency to Launch Uber-Like ‘On-Demand’ Service, The Mercury News (Nov. 16, 2017), https://www.mercurynews.com/2017/11/16/east-bay-bus-agency-to-launch-uber-like-on-demand- service/. 415 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY LIBRARY, http://ccclib.org/. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 203 of ? most often to isolated offices (i.e. Antioch city clerk’s office).416 At least five of the 19 municipal governments have no TTY numbers whatsoever. In the absence of TTY numbers, deaf and hearing-impaired people can use Telecommunications Relay Service417 by dialing 711 or use Internet Protocol Relay Service418 with any internet connection. The relay service will then contact the recipient through the regular telephone network, and relay the message back and forth between the parties. Predictably, this is much more time consuming than TTY. In lieu of obtaining TTY equipment, municipalities could consider a live chat option on their websites, which would function similarly and allow deaf and hearing-impaired people to contact governments simply by using an internet connection. At least four of Contra Costa County’s municipality websites have ADA Transition Plans posted and available for the public’s perusal. However, only two of those ADA Transition Plans are searchable pdfs, which poses obvious accessibility issues for the people whom the plans affect. The ADA Transition Plans are not alone; oftentimes pdfs, and most especially large pdfs, are not searchable on these municipal websites.419 This poses a sizeable challenge to readers with disabilities who may need to employ screen reader software to understand the documents; however, it can easily be remedied by the government re-uploading searchable versions of these files. Inaccessible public or private infrastructure Inaccessible public or private infrastructure is a major contributing factor to segregation of people with disabilities. Contra Costa County’s Public Works Department upgrades and installs curb ramps throughout the County, and provides a curb ramp request form online,420 as do smaller municipalities within the County.421 An accessibility lawsuit settled in 2009 regarding the lack of curb cuts and other accessibility features in Antioch, Brentwood, Concord, Danville, El Cerrito, Martinez, Moraga, Orinda, Pinole, Pittsburg, Pleasant Hill, Richmond, San Pablo, and Walnut Creek.422 The settlement directed the cities to dedicate at 416 Contact City of Antioch, ANTIOCH, CALIFORNIA, http://www.ci.antioch.ca.us/contact.htm. 417 Telecommunications Relay Service – TRS, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/telecommunications-relay-service-trs. 418 IP Relay Service, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/ip-relay- service. 419 Particularly relevant examples include “Draft Accessible Transit in Contra Costa County” http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/46833; “Contra Costa County ADA Transition Plan Update” http://www.contracosta.ca.gov/documentcenter/view/5499; “‘Way to go, Contra Costa!’ A Guide to Transportation Resources in Contra Costa County” http://www.co.contra- costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/4478. 420 Curb Ramp Program/ADA, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, http://www.co.contra-costa.ca.us/385/Curb-Ramp- Program-ADA. 421 See, e.g. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/2526/Americans-with-Disabilities-Act-ADA. 422 Sara Steffens, Sidewalk Access Spurs Lawsuits, EAST BAY TIMES (Apr. 26, 2007), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2007/04/26/sidewalk-access-spurs-lawsuits/; Notice of Proposed Class Action 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 204 of ? least five percent of gas tax revenues for up to 30 years to ADA Advisory Committee Accounts which would install curb ramps, audible pedestrian signals, and other accessibility features. Several localities note this in their Capital Improvement Plans.423 Others note curb cut projects in their ADA Transition Plan documents or more generally on their website.424 However, looking at localities’ government websites, it is far from clear how comprehensive the projects are, or how much progress has been made. Despite the success of the lawsuit that created this gas tax program, there is a general feeling that ADA lawsuits are brought by profit-minded attorneys, using luring tactics and making quick money via settlements.425 Such concerns prompted passage of Senate Bill 269 in 2016, which gives small businesses additional time to fix ADA violations before state fines are accrued, and additional time to address violations if privately sued.426 Beyond curb ramps, the problem of uneven sidewalks becomes worrisome for wheelchair users, as the maintenance and repair of curbs and sidewalks is the responsibility of individual property owners.427 As it is individual property owners who are responsible for repairs, cities most likely do not have comprehensive records, or even knowledge, of problem areas within their purview. This may allow for sidewalks to remain in disrepair, virtually unchecked – posing great difficulties for wheelchair users. Potential sidewalk and road problems are also hinted-at by Tri Delta Transit, one of the city bus service providers in Contra Costa County. Tri Delta Transit’s website notes that “All Tri Delta Transit buses are wheelchair lift equipped, however not all bus stops are safe for deployment of the lift.”428 When contacted for confirmation and further details, a representative for Tri Delta Transit said that that was no longer accurate, stating instead that Tri Delta Transit buses are capable of deploying the lift at Settlement and Fairness Hearing, Press Release, City of Concord, http://www.cityofconcord.org/pdf/docs/joint_notice.pdf. 423 See, e.g., Capital Improvement Program Fund Descriptions, CITY OF PLEASANT HILL (2012-2014), http://www.ci.pleasant-hill.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/10184; Executive Summary: Capital Improvement Plan, CITY OF RICHMOND (2015-2020), http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/View/34528; City of Antioch 5 Year Captial Improvement Program 2018-2023, CITY OF ANTIOCH (June 12, 2018), https://www.antiochca.gov/fc/capital-improvements/2018-2023-five-year-capital-improvement-program.pdf. 424 See, e.g., ADA Transition Plan, CITY OF EL CERRITO (August 2009), https://el- cerrito.org/DocumentCenter/View/484; ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan Update, CITY OF CONCORD (Sept. 2009), http://www.cityofconcord.org/pdf/pw/ada/setp.pdf; 2016 Microsurfacing and Curb Ramp Program, CITY OF EL CERRITO, http://www.el-cerrito.org/995/2016-Microsurfacing-and-Curb-Ramp-Projec. 425 Matthias Gafni, Serial ADA Lawsuit Filer Striking Bay Area, East Bay Times (Apr. 10, 2016), https://www.eastbaytimes.com/2016/04/10/serial-ada-lawsuit-filer-striking-bay-area/; Eric Thomas, San Ramon Gas Station Owners Accused of Violating ADA Laws , ABC 7 NEWS (Apr. 11, 2016), http://abc7news.com/news/san-ramon-gas-station-owners-accused-of-violating-ada-laws/1286761/. 426 Calif. Governor Signs ADA Tort-Reform Bill, Press Release, California State Senator Richard D. Roth, May 11, 2016, http://sd31.senate.ca.gov/news/2016-05-11-calif-governor-signs-ada-tort-reform-bill. 427 See California Streets and Highways Code (Sections 5610-5618) and the City of Concord Municipal Code (Sections 12.25.030-12.25.040); Sidewalk Repair Program, CITY OF CONCORD, CALIFORNIA, http://www.cityofconcord.org/page.asp?pid=7018. 428 Passengers with Disabilities, TRI DELTA TRANSIT, http://trideltatransit.com/disabilities.aspx. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 205 of ? all stops, but that some stops are “a little difficult.”429 Tri Delta Transit promised to update the website to reflect this information, but has yet to do so. This discrepancy certainly raises concerns that sidewalks and roads at these bus stops are substandard in their accessibility, and further investigation into the details may be required. Lack of access to opportunity due to high housing costs High housing costs are a significant contributing factor to disparities in access to opportunity for people with disabilities. In 2016, the average annual income of an individual receiving supplemental security income (SSI) was $9,156, which is just 20 percent of the national median income of a one-person household and 22 percent below the federal poverty level.430 The cost of housing is likely keeping these individuals out of high opportunity neighborhoods. The American Community Survey indicates that Antioch, a lower opportunity area with fewer social services and less public transportation, has higher rates of disability than both the County and the region. 11.9 percent of individuals under 65 have disabilities in Antioch compared with 2.9 percent in Orinda.431 Orinda, a high opportunity area with access to transit and high-quality schools, also has significantly higher housing costs. While the median home value and the median rent for Antioch respectively is $291,000 and $1,439, the median home value in Orinda is $1,125,000 and the median rent is $2,337. Thus, Orinda is largely inaccessible to people with disabilities on fixed income. Lack of affordable in-home or community-based supportive services Lack of affordable in-home or community-based supportive services is a major contributing factor to segregation of people with disabilities. California offers several home and community-based services through Medi-Cal (California’s Medicaid program) waivers. Often, these services are provided to patients who would otherwise have to live in an institution; these programs allow patients to remain in the community and maintain networks of support. Services include case management, skilled nursing, attendant care, psychotherapy, home-delivered meals, nutritional counseling, nutritional supplements, medical equipment and supplies, minor physical adaptations to the home, non-emergency medical transportation, financial supplements for foster care, and others. Although California does not provide Medi-Cal to undocumented immigrants, it does carve out exceptions for some low- income undocumented immigrants.432 Under SB 75, to be implemented no sooner than May 1, 2016, all children under age 19 are eligible for Medi-Cal, regardless of immigration status.433 429 Conversation with “Mary” at Tri Delta Transit. 430 Priced Out: Fact Sheet, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COLLABORATIVE (Dec. 12, 2017), http://www.tacinc.org/media/59489/priced-out-fact-sheet.pdf. 431 QuickFacts: Orinda City, California, UNITED STATES CENSUS BUREAU, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/orindacitycalifornia/DIS010216#viewtop . 432 Health Coverage and Care for Undocumented Immigrants, PUBLIC POLICY INSTITUTE OF CALIFORNIA, http://www.ppic.org/publication/health-coverage-and-care-for-undocumented-immigrants/. 433 SB 75 – Full Scope Medi-Cal for All Children, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, http://www.dhcs.ca.gov/services/medi-cal/eligibility/Pages/sb-75.aspx. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 206 of ? Seniors and people with disabilities who wish to live at home can also qualify for In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) through Medi-Cal. IHSS is the nation’s largest publicly-funded home care program, open to legal CA residents who don’t live in an institution and are 65 or older, blind, or long-term disabled.434 IHSS pays a caregiver (which can be a friend or relative) to perform necessary daily living activities depending on the person’s needs (including housekeeping, spoon feeding, bathing, grocery shopping, etc.). A yearly visit by a social worker is required, and an additional visit by a social worker is required if there are to be any changes to the scope of IHSS. A recent report found that there are thousands of backlogged IHSS cases in the Bay Area, where patients are overdue for their social worker check-ins.435 Over 30 percent of the backlogged cases are in Contra Costa. Victoria Tolbert, Director of Contra Costa’s Adult and Aging Services Department, which implements Contra Costa’s IHSS program, points to flaws in the funding structure. The program was conceived while Contra Costa was a rural county, which it no longer is. She also pointed to a lack of social workers, with current workloads at 300+ cases per year, and eight vacancies in the department competing with other counties which can afford to pay more. Tolbert plans to suggest a pilot program for Contra Costa to the state to explore alternative structures. Dental care is also available to elderly and disabled patients through Denti-Cal. However, recent changes to the budget and authorization procedures have created large gaps in service to needy individuals.436 Dental hygienists perform in-home visits to vulnerable patients who often have major dental problems and gum disease due to various factors stemming from disability and in-home care. Hygienists often need to visit every three months for preventative care and in order to treat gum disease. The reimbursement rate for these services was recently cut from $130 to $55 in a bid to “reduce unnecessary dental treatment.”437 This drastic cut has forced some hygienists out of the market, and prompted a lawsuit arguing that the reimbursement rate was cut without the requisite prior federal approval. Lack of affordable, accessible housing in range of unit sizes The lack of affordable, accessible housing in a range of unit sizes is a contributing factor to segregation and disproportionate housing needs for persons with disabilities. Persons with disabilities in Contra Costa County disproportionately have low incomes and live in poverty, 434 They must also meet one of the following criteria: currently receiving SSI/SSP, meeting all SSI/SSP standards except for income, meeting all SSI/SSP standards except for being a non-citizen, was once eligible for SSI/SSP but became ineligible because of substantial gainful work and meeting BUT meeting all other SSI/SSP standards. Aging & Adult Services/In Home Supportive Services, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, http://www.co.contra- costa.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/6039. 435 3,682 in Alameda County, 2,796 in Contra Costa County, and 3,285 in Santa Clara County. By percentage, that’s 16.2% in Alameda, 14.5% in Santa Clara, and 31.5% in Contra Costa. 436 Ana B. Ibarra, Frail Patients Losing Access to Dental House Calls, KAISER HEALTH NEWS (Jan. 2, 2018) https://khn.org/news/frail-patients-losing-access-to-dental-house-calls/. 437 The California state health department found it “unusual” that nearly 88% of Denti -Cal patients in nursing homes received deep cleanings in 2013-2014. This statistic raised questions of their necessity. Now, patients that live in special care facilities must get prior authorization (via x-rays) to treat gum disease. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 207 of ? thus increasing their relative need for affordable housing. While 8.4 percent of individuals, 16 years of age or older in the County who do not have disabilities, have incomes below the federal poverty line, 16.4 percent of persons, with a disability in the County in that age cohort, have incomes below the federal poverty line. The median earnings for individuals without disabilities in the County is $42,247 compared to $25,782 for persons with disabilities. These disparities persist at the city-level in Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. In light of the broader affordable housing shortage in the County and the Region, there is certainly a shortage for persons with disabilities. The fact that much of the affordable housing that exists, particularly older units and developments, is not accessible, further compounds the effects that the lack of housing for persons with disabilities who need accessibility features has. In comparison to the Region, the County’s housing stock disproportionately consists of single-family homes that are not subject to accessibility requirements. A segment of the County’s public housing stock is quite old and was not built with modern accessibility requirements in mind (though it is subject to the modification requirements of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act). New affordable, multifamily units – those that are most likely to be both affordable and accessible – are too few in number to meet the total need.438 Lastly, supportive housing developments – like the Tabora Gardens Senior Apartments439 – often consist primarily or exclusively of one-bedroom apartments. Although the need for supportive housing for persons with disabilities likely consists primarily of a need for one- bedroom units, there are individuals at risk of institutionalization who have dependent children and persons with disabilities who need a live-in aide with their own bedroom. Including a mix of a small number of two- and even three-bedroom units in developments with a supportive housing component would foster greater community integration. The dearth of affordable, accessible housing in a range of unit sizes exacerbates two fair housing issues. First, when individuals with disabilities are not able to secure such housing, the alternative may be segregation in congregate settings like nursing homes and group homes. Second, if low-income persons with disabilities have to navigate the private market in order to obtain housing with the accessibility features they need, they may incur the disproportionate housing need of elevated cost burden as a result. Lack of affordable, integrated housing for individuals who need supportive services 438 Based on local data, approximately 94 out of 264 affordable housing options are accessible. Based on available data, of those options, 22 buildings have only 0-1 bedrooms, 30 buildings have up to 2 bedrooms, 26 buildings have up to 3 bedrooms, and 12 buildings have up to 4 bedrooms. 439 Based on local data, of approximately 17 dedicated senior affordable living facilities, eight buildings have exclusively one-bedroom units, and 6 have one- and two-bedroom units (3 buildings data unknown). 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 208 of ? A lack of affordable, integrated housing for individuals who need supportive services contributes to segregation and disproportionate housing needs for persons with disabilities. As discussed above, very little integrated, supportive housing is targeted at persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities, whether through set-asides that may require HUD approval or through affirmative marketing. Although, thanks to the Mental Health Services Act, there is more affordable housing that is targeted at persons with psychiatric disabilities, the total amount of such housing still falls short of the need. Individuals with psychiatric disabilities, their families, and service providers have noted that lack of access to housing impedes stable community integration for persons with psychiatric disabilities. In the absence of a sufficient supply of affordable, integrated housing for individuals who need supportive services, persons with disabilities are stuck between two undesirable choices: segregation in a congregate and perhaps institutional setting and the cost burden of paying unsustainable rents. Lack of assistance for housing accessibility modifications Lack of assistance for housing accessibility modifications contributes to the segregation of persons with disabilities in Contra Costa County. Although the County provides funding for home repairs and improvements that explicitly include those focused on accessibility, its Neighborhood Preservation Program has a waiting list that can require homeowners to wait six months or more for assistance. The program provides both low-interest loans and small grants depending on the income level and creditworthiness of the applicant. In addition to the insufficiency of available resources in comparison to the total need, another gap left by the program is that it does not provide assistance to renters. Although Section 504 of the Rehabilitation requires providers of housing that receives federal financial assistance to pay for the cost of reasonable modifications under certain circumstances, there is no such obligation in private housing. Thus, for low-income tenants with disabilities who do not reside in publicly supported housing, there is no assistance for modifications. If displaced from their current residences, the only option may be segregation in a nursing home. In addition to the County, the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek all provide resources, whether through CDBG funds or redevelopment agency successor funds, for home repair and rehabilitation, including accessibility modifications for homeowners. Antioch and Walnut Creek contract with Habitat for Humanity of the East Bay/Silicon Valley to provide these services while Concord engages Hello Housing and Pittsburg administers its program in-house. These programs help to meet the need for accessibility modifications among homeowners, but the amount of need outstrips available resources. For example, as of August 2018, Habitat’s website indicated that it was not currently offering repair services in the City of Antioch, likely because funded services were oversubscribed (the website did note that services are provided in Walnut Creek). As with the County, these four cities have not funded accessibility modifications for low-income renters with disabilities living in private housing. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 209 of ? Lack of assistance for transitioning from institutional settings to integrated housing A lack of assistance for transitioning from institutional settings to integrated housing is a contributing factor to segregation for persons with disabilities in Contra Costa County. For individuals with psychiatric disabilities, there appears to be a broad lack of support for services specifically targeted at facilitating transition from institutions to integrated housing. The website of the California Department of State Hospitals does not reference any services focused on helping individuals who have been civilly committed transition to community- based settings. The California Department of Developmental Services does provide transition services to residents of Developmental Services; however, both for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and for persons with disabilities more generally, there is a lack of services to assist in the transition from less traditional institutional settings like nursing homes and augmented board and care homes. Some service providers and government agencies provide housing search assistance and case management to individuals with various types of disabilities, including those who are at risk of institutionalization, but those services do not appear to focus on current residents of institutions. Accordingly, there is a significant gap in transition services, particularly for individuals with psychiatric disabilities. Inability to access transition services can prevent transition from occurring, thus perpetuating segregation. Lack of local or regional cooperation Lack of local or regional cooperation is discussed in more detail in the Segregation section. Lack of local or regional cooperation is not a significant contributing factor to segregation of people with disabilities. Land use and zoning laws Land use and zoning laws are discussed in more detail in the Segregation section. Land use and zoning is a much more significant contributing factor to Segregation and R/ECAPs than to segregation of people with disabilities. Lending discrimination Lending discrimination is discussed in more detail in the Segregation section. Lending discrimination is not a significant contributing factor to segregation of people with disabilities. Location of accessible housing 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 210 of ? Location of accessible housing is discussed in more detail in the Segregation section. Location of accessible housing is not a significant contributing factor to segregation of people with disabilities. Loss of Affordable Housing Loss of affordable housing is discussed in more detail in the Segregation section of this Assessment. Diminished affordable housing is a strong contributing factor to perpetuating disability and access problems. In 2016, the average annual income of an individual receiving supplemental security income (SSI) was $9,156, which is just 20 percent of the national median income of a one-person household and 22 percent below the federal poverty level.440 In California, the statewide average one-bedroom rent is 138 percent of the state’s monthly SSI payment. In 2017, 25,747 individuals in Contra Costa received SSI payments.441 Occupancy codes and restrictions Occupancy codes and restrictions are discussed in greater detail in the Segregation section of this Assessment. Occupancy codes and restrictions are not a very strong contributing factor to segregation of people with disabilities. Regulatory barriers to providing housing and supportive services for persons with disabilities Source of income discrimination Regulatory barriers to providing housing and supportive services for persons with disabilities are not a significant contributing factor to fair housing issues in Contra Costa County and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. Some of the municipalities within the County have generally applicable land use regulations requiring congregate facilities, regardless of the disability status of their occupants, to obtain certain permits in order to operate within particular zoning districts. The most common type of restriction along these lines is the requirement of a conditional use permit for group homes with seven or more residents. The added step of having to obtain and administrative permit or, in more extreme cases, a conditional use permit, does burden those providing housing to persons with disabilities. At the same time, the cities in question also generally have reasonable accommodations policies written into their zoning ordinances. Additionally, neither the community participation process nor available data, including from the Region Center of the East Bay, indicated that difficulty in siting group homes was a major issue. Instead a lack of integrated, permanent supportive housing is the more significant contributing factor to the segregation of persons with disabilities. Generally applicable density restrictions, analyzed alongside 440 Priced Out: Fact Sheet, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE COLLABORATIVE (Dec. 12, 2017), http://www.tacinc.org/media/59489/priced-out-fact-sheet.pdf. 441 SSI Recipients by State and County, 2017- Table 3 - California, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (2017), https://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/ssi_sc/2017/ca.pdf. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 211 of ? other zoning and land use laws and policies, and a shortage of public resources for affordable housing are the drivers of that shortfall. This Assessment did not reveal any regulatory barriers to the provision of supportive services as opposed to housing. The pernicious role of criminal background screening in limiting housing choice for persons with disabilities is analyzed in connecting with the “admissions and occupancy policies and procedures, including preferences in publicly supported housing” contributing factor. State or local laws, policies, or practices that discourage individuals with disabilities from living in apartments, family homes, supportive housing, shared housing and other integrated settings State or local laws, policies, or practices that discourage individuals with disabilities from living in apartments, family homes, supportive housing, shared housing, and other integrated settings are a significant contributing factor to fair housing issues to the segregation of persons with disabilities in Contra Costa County or the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. This Assessment did not reveal supportive services programs in the area that condition eligibility for services on residence in segregated settings. However, there is a long history of criticism of the adequacy of Medi-Cal’s reimbursement rates, which have resulted in serial litigation. The service provider community needs adequate reimbursement rates in order to be able to serve persons with complex needs, such as for live-in aides. If the incentive structure is not in place to engage providers, individuals with disabilities often have few residential choices outside of congregate settings. Group homes, though they are less cost-effective than independent living, are structured to minimize the impact of rates by aggregating service costs across consumers. Improved rates would foster community integration. Constraints related to the availability of supportive housing and supportive services are discussed in more detail with respect to other contributing factors. 4.8 Fair Housing Enforcement, Outreach Capacity, and Resources Analysis The following section describes the status of fair housing enforcement throughout the County, and evaluates related capacity and resources. It provides an overview of current and recent fair housing claims and findings; state and local fair housing laws, which protect residents from discrimination; and local organizations that focus on protecting fair housing rights and providing counseling and public education. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 212 of ? Unresolved complaints, findings, etc., including the following  A charge or letter of finding from HUD concerning a violation of a civil rights-related law;  A cause determination from a substantially equivalent state or local fair housing agency concerning a violation of a state or local fair housing law;  Any voluntary compliance agreements, conciliation agreements, or settlement agreements entered into with HUD or the Department of Justice;  A letter of findings issued by or lawsuit filed or joined by the Department of Justice alleging a pattern or practice or systemic violation of a fair housing or civil rights law;  A claim under the False Claims Act related to fair housing, nondiscrimination, or civil rights generally, including an alleged failure to affirmatively further fair housing; or  A pending administrative complaints or lawsuits against the locality alleging fair housing violations or discrimination. Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) Complaints: Table 1 (see appendix) details complaint trends in Contra Costa from 2011 through 2017, based on DFEH’s annual reports. Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa (HACCC) Conciliation/ Voluntary Compliance Agreement: On November 7, 2017, a disabled woman filed a complaint with HUD against HACCC and the Vallejo Housing Authority (VHA). The complaint alleged that both housing authorities violated the Fair Housing Act, as well as the Americans with Disabilities Act, by denying her reasonable accommodation request for a time extension to search for suitable housing to accept her Housing Choice Voucher. The woman lost her voucher because of her request’s denial. On February 13, 2018, HUD announced that it reached a Conciliation/ Voluntary Compliance Agreement with HACCC and VHA. As part of the agreement, HACCC and VHA will pay the woman a total of $10,000 ($9,000 from HACCC and $1,000 from VHA) and reinstate her Housing Choice Voucher. The authorities will also give the woman more time to find housing. Richmond Housing Authority (RHA) Conciliation Agreement: On March 28, 2017, a disabled resident filed a complaint with HUD against RHA for refusing to grant his reasonable accommodations request and terminating his Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher. As a result, the resident had to place his belongings in storage and reside in homeless shelters and with relatives. On December 14, 2017, HUD reached a Conciliation Agreement with the resident and RHA. As part of the agreement, RHA must pay the resident $5,833.00 to reimburse him for the storage costs. RHA must also reinstate the resident’s Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher. Additionally, 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 213 of ? RHA employees responsible for making decisions regarding the Housing Choice Voucher Program must attend HUD fair housing training. State and local fair housing laws California Law: Government Code Section 12955 et seq – Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA): Prohibits housing discrimination or harassment in housing practices, including advertising, the application and selection process, unlawful evictions, terms and conditions of tenancy, privileges of occupancy, and mortgage loans and insurance. Government Code Section 12955(l) prohibits discrimination through public or private land use practices, decisions, and authorizations. The following categories are protected by FEHA: race, color, religion, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status (households with children under 18 years of age), source of income, disability, or genetic information. In addition, FEHA contains similar reasonable accommodations, reasonable modifications, and accessibility provisions to the Federal Fair Housing Amendments Act. FEHA explicitly provides that violations can be proven through evidence of the unjustified disparate impact of challenged actions and inactions and establishes the burden shifting framework that courts and the Department of Fair Employment and Housing must use in evaluating disparate impact claims. The FEHA also incorporates the Unruh Act (Civil Code section 51), the Ralph Act (Civil Code section 51.7) and the Bane Act (Civil Code section 52.1). The Unruh Civil Rights Act provides protection from discrimination by all business establishments in California (including housing and accommodations) because of age, ancestry, color, disability, national origin, race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation. While the Unruh Civil Rights Act specifically lists “sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, and medical condition” as protected classes, the California Supreme Court has held that protections under the Unruh Act are not necessarily restricted to these characteristics. In practice, this has meant that the law protects against arbitrary discrimination, including discrimination on the basis of personal appearance. Furthermore, the Ralph Civil Rights Act (California Civil Code Section 51.7) forbids acts of violence or threats of violence because of a person’s race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, age, disability, sex, sexual orientation, political affiliation, or position in a labor dispute. Hate violence can include: verbal or written threats; physical assault or attempted assault; and graffiti, vandalism, or property damage. Ralph Act provides that all persons have the right to be free from violence committed against themselves or their property because of their race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, political affiliation, sex, sexual orientation, 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 214 of ? age, disability, position in a labor dispute, or because another person perceives them to have one or more of these characteristics. The Bane Civil Rights Act (California Civil Code Section 52.1) provides another layer of protection for fair housing choice by protecting all people in California from interference by force or threat of force with an individual’s constitutional or statutory rights, including a right to equal access to housing. The Bane Act also includes criminal penalties for hate crimes; however, convictions under the Act may not be imposed for speech alone unless that speech itself threatened violence. California Civil Code Section 1940.3 prohibits landlords from questioning potential residents about their immigration or citizenship status. In addition, this law forbids local jurisdictions from passing laws that direct landlords to make inquiries about a person’s citizenship or immigration status. In addition to these acts, Government Code Sections 11135, 65008, and 65580-65589.8 prohibit discrimination in programs funded by the State and in any land use decisions. Specifically, recent changes to Sections 65580-65589.8 require local jurisdictions to address the provision of housing options for special needs groups, including: Housing for persons with disabilities (SB 520), Housing for homeless persons, including emergency shelters, transitional housing, and supportive housing (SB 2), Housing for extremely low income households, including single-room occupancy units (AB 2634), and Housing for persons with developmental disabilities (SB 812). City of Richmond Ordinance: The Fair Chance Access to Affordable Housing Ordinance (Chapter 7.110) prohibits discrimination based on past criminal convictions. Housing providers are forbidden from requiring applicants to disclose information regarding their arrest or conviction history. City of Walnut Creek Ordinance: The Reasonable Accommodation Ordinance (Title 10- 2.3.1301, 1302) provides for reasonable accommodations in land use and zoning regulations to ensure people with disabilities have equal access to housing. Local and regional agencies and organizations that provide fair housing information, outreach, and enforcement, and capacity and the resources available to them ECHO Housing, which has an office in Antioch, provides a range of housing counseling to very low and moderate income clients in almost all of Contra Costa County. Currently, ECHO provides fair housing services in unincorporated Contra Costa County, Antioch, Concord, Richmond, and Walnut Creek as well as in other counties in the Bay Area. ECHO also provides tenant/landlord services in unincorporated Contra Costa County and in Richmond and 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 215 of ? Walnut Creek. In addition, ECHO operates a rent review and eviction harassment program for the City of Concord. ECHO also conducts fair housing investigations and testing. Recent testing has focused on detecting instances of discrimination based on race or disability. Although ECHO serves almost all of Contra Costa County, it suffers from a severe lack of resources and capacity. Indeed, due to the lack of resources, only one fair housing counselor serves Contra Costa County. Pacific Community Services is a private non-profit housing agency that provides fair housing counseling in the City of Pittsburg. The organization provides fair housing pre-purchase education workshops, mortgage delinquency and default resolution counseling, rental housing counseling, and pre-purchase counseling for homebuyers. Bay Area Legal Aid provides free civil legal advice, counsel, and representation to low-income individuals and is also the region’s leading provider of legal services to individuals that face discrimination in housing. Bay Area Legal Aid has a Richmond office to serve Contra Costa residents. Specifically, the office helps clients make complaints to government agencies, will investigate unfair treatment, will advocate to landlords on behalf of tenants, and will sue landlords if necessary. Bay Area Legal Aid also has “remote advocacy sites” in Antioch, Concord, and Pittsburg. However, a lack of funding constrains Bay Area Legal Aid’s ability to provide fair housing services in Contra Costa. Fair housing enforcement, outreach capacity, and resources The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) accepts, investigates, conciliates, mediates, and prosecutes complaints under FEHA, the Disabled Persons Act, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and the Ralph Civil Rights Act. DFEH investigates complaints of employment and housing discrimination based on race, sex, including gender, gender identity, and gender 353 expression, religious creed, color, national origin, familiar status, medical condition (cured cancer only), ancestry, physical or mental disability, marital status, or age (over 40 only), and sexual orientation, DFEH established a program in May 2003 for mediating housing discrimination complaints, which is among the largest fair housing mediation program in the nation to be developed under HUD’s Partnership Initiative with state fair housing enforcement agencies. The program provides California’s tenants, landlords, and property owners and managers with a means of resolving housing discrimination cases in a fair, confidential, and cost-effective manner. Key features of the program are: 1) it is free of charge to the parties; and 2) mediation takes place within the first 30 days of the filing of the complaint, often avoiding the financial and emotional costs associated with a full DFEH investigation and potential litigation. Fair Housing Enforcement, Outreach Capacity, and Resources Contributing Factors 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 216 of ? Lack of local public fair housing enforcement In recent years, California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) has received 30-40 housing complaints for Contra Costa County annually. The number of housing complaints between 2011 and 2016 has remained relatively stable. While this consistency demonstrates that fair housing enforcement in Contra Costa has not worsened, it also suggests that additional efforts may be needed to prevent reoccurring problems. Lack of meaningful language access Contra Costa County has a large limited-English proficient (LEP) population. According to the 2016 American Community Survey, 14.2 percent of the population in Contra Costa County speak English less than “very well”. Among Spanish speakers, 44.7 percent of individuals speak English less than well. A slightly smaller percentage (42.5 percent) of speakers of Asian and Pacific Island speakers are able to speak English less than “very well” and 30.1 percent of speakers of other Indo-European languages speak English less than “very well”. There are several resources to assist LEP individuals with fair housing. For example, the City of Walnut Creek uses Language Line, a language translation and interpretation service for LEP Persons. ECHO Fair Housing provides information in Spanish and Bay Area Legal Aid uses volunteer interpreters/translators to help provide language access and its legal advice line provides counsel and advice in different languages. The County has a Language Access Plan and provides language assistance to persons upon request; however, given the diversity and size of the LEP population in Contra Costa County, a lack of language access in a broad range of languages may still limit fair housing outreach efforts. Lack of resources for fair housing agencies and organizations Fair housing groups’ lack of resources is a contributing factor to a lack of fair housing enforcement in Contra Costa. The County and the surrounding region is home to multiple private fair housing organizations, including Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California (formerly Fair Housing of Marin), ECHO Fair Housing, and Bay Area Legal Aid. ECHO performs site investigations in response to housing discrimination complaints. It receives funding from local cities and counties, HUD, and private donors. ECHO currently suffers from a severe lack of resources; it has just one fair housing counselor for the entire County. Similarly, Bay Area Legal Aid does not have the funding to provide services for people facing housing discrimination, which further burdens groups like ECHO that are providing such services. Lack of state or local fair housing laws California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act prohibits all housing providers, including local governments, from discriminating in housing development and all actions related to the provision of housing based on a wide variety of characteristics including sex, gender identity, gender expression, sexual orientation, marital status, ancestry, familial status, disability, or genetic information. Although there is a robust state fair housing law, Contra Costa County does not have an ordinance on fair housing. Of the incorporated cities within the County, only 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 217 of ? Concord has a comprehensive fair housing ordinance. Richmond has a housing ordinance that specifically prohibits discrimination based on past criminal conviction. Walnut Creek has a reasonable accommodation ordinance requiring that people with disabilities have equal access to housing. Private discrimination Private discrimination continues to be a problem in Contra Costa County, perpetuating segregation. In 2016, the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing reported that it received 32 housing complaints from residents of Contra Costa County. In 2011, Fair Housing of Marin (now known as Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California) under contract with Bay Area Legal Aid conducted fair housing testing via phone to investigate housing discrimination in Richmond. In the testing, white testers and Black testers called 20 housing providers who had posted rental advertisements on Craigslist. Ultimately, the test showed there was significant differential treatment in favor of white testers over Black testers in 55 percent of calls. A separate round of testing conducted in 2012 to investigate national origin discrimination in Richmond found that in 30 percent of tests, Latino testers faced at least some type of differential treatment compared to a non-Hispanic White tester. Because Whites receive better services, they tend to live in neighborhoods apart from minority groups. Private discrimination also perpetuates disparities in opportunity, as minorities who face adversity when seeking housing are less likely to live in neighborhoods with access to better schools, jobs, and healthcare options. Unresolved violations of fair housing or civil rights laws Fair Housing Advocates of Northern California (FHANC), along with the National Fair Housing Alliance (NFHA) and 18 other fair housing organizations, is suing Deutsche Bank for housing discrimination. The lawsuit alleges that Deutsche Bank intentionally failed to maintain foreclosed bank homes in middle- and working-class Black and Latino homes in 30 metropolitan areas across the country, including Contra Costa cities such as Antioch, Brentwood, and Richmond. The lawsuit highlights how homes in White communities are far more likely to have manicured lawns, secured gates and windows, and well-maintained homes. In contrast, homes in predominantly minority communities are far more likely to have overgrown lawns, graffiti, boarded doors, bent gutters, and trash. The last amended HUD complaint was filed on July 26, 2017. FHANC, NFHA, and other housing organizations are also suing Fannie Mae for maintaining and marketing foreclosed homes in White neighborhoods better than homes in Black and Latino neighborhoods in areas across the country, including Richmond, California. The lawsuit was filed on December 5, 2016. Two housing authorities recently resolved complaints filed against them with HUD. On February 13, 2018, the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa (HACCC) and the 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 218 of ? Vallejo Housing Authority (VHA) reached a Conciliation Agreement with a disabled woman. The woman had filed a complaint against HACCC and VHA after being denied a reasonable accommodation request for a time extension to search for suitable housing to accept her Housing Choice Voucher. On December 14, 2017, the Richmond Housing Authority (RHA) reached a Conciliation Agreement with a disabled resident. The resident had filed a complaint after RHA refused to grant his reasonable accommodations request and terminated his Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 219 of ? Chapter 5. Regional Analysis of Impediments Goals 1. Increase available financial resources for affordable housing in order to better fund efforts to foster stable residential integration and increased access to opportunity. i. Explore a countywide affordable housing bond issuance that includes efforts to develop permanent supportive housing, to build affordable housing for families, and to preserve affordable housing in areas undergoing gentrification and displacement. Efforts to support a bond issue could include the posting of informational materials regarding the need for affordable housing and the possible uses of bond proceedings on government agency websites. ii. If bond does not pass, consider other sources for a County-wide housing trust fund. 2. Provide for the production of additional affordable housing through market incentives and improvements. i. Promote market rate housing to include affordable units, such as by promoting use of density bonuses ii. Explore the production of units that are affordable by design, such as Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and micro-units iii. Evaluate options for stream-line processing of affordable housing developments 3. Increase residential racial and ethnic integration by increasing the supply of affordable housing for families in high opportunity areas. i. Discourage or eliminate live/work preferences in inclusionary ordinances ii. Coordinate use of housing subsidies such as Project-Based Vouchers and RAD transfers of assistance with emerging opportunities to build or access affordable housing in high-opportunity areas (such as new bond measures or LIHTC development), in order to increase access to designated opportunity areas with low poverty rates, healthy neighborhoods, and high-performing schools among subsidized households. iii. Consider any affordable housing funding sources (including new sources such as bond funds) that create balance in the location of affordable 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 220 of ? housing throughout the county, by supporting the creation of affordable units, in particular for families, in high-opportunity areas. 4. Increase the supply of permanent supportive housing for people with disabilities and services for people with disabilities i. To the extent practicable, use affordable housing funds for the construction of permanent supportive housing in developments in which 10-25% of units are set aside for persons with disabilities. Affirmatively market units to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, their families, and service providers, such as the Regional Center of the East Bay. ii. Explore methods for nonprofit partners to assist in purchasing or master leasing affordable units within inclusionary market-rate developments, and set a portion of those units aside for persons with disabilities. iii. Explore funding options for continuing community-based services for possible expansion of services, particularly for persons with psychiatric disabilities. 5. Reduce housing discrimination and discriminatory barriers to residential mobility. i. Educate landlords on criminal background screening in rental housing (using HUD fair housing guidance) and explore the feasibility of adopting ordinances. ii. Develop and disseminate a best practices guide to credit screening in the rental housing context in order to discourage the use of strict FICO score cut-offs and overreliance on eviction records. iii. Develop and distribute informational brochure on inclusionary leasing practices, including with licenses where applicable. iv. Increase outreach to LGBTQ and immigrant stakeholder groups to provide “know your rights” materials regarding housing discrimination. v. Continue and increase outreach and education activities for all protected classes. vi. Include education on new requirements of the Right to a Safe Home Act in outreach activities to both landlords and the public. vii. For publicly-supported housing, develop protocols to ensure responsiveness to reasonable accommodation requests. 6. Address barriers to mobility for families and individuals in publicly-supported housing, including Housing Choice Voucher participants. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 221 of ? i. Provide mobility counseling and updated briefing materials to families with or eligible for Housing Choice Vouchers, including with regard to healthy neighborhoods and high-performing, low poverty schools. ii. Provide block grant or other funding for security deposits (including for voucher holders). iii. Require developers to affirmatively market affordable units (especially in opportunity areas) to voucher holders throughout the county. iv. Implement measures to address source of income discrimination against Housing Choice Voucher participants and landlord reluctance to participate in the HCV program, including increased landlord support and contact, production of an owner’s packet, and outreach and education (including workshops). 7. Reduce the displacement of low-income communities of color by enhancing protections for vulnerable tenants and homeowners and preserving affordable housing in areas that are gentrifying or at risk of gentrification. i. Explore the development of displacement mitigation or replacement requirements for any rezoning activities that could displace existing residents. ii. Explore the feasibility of adopting tenant protections, such as relocation costs, increased noticing, just cause, and rent control ordinances (as permitted by state law), to cover the unincorporated areas of the County and the Cities of Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, and Walnut Creek. iii. Continue funding and support multi-agency collaborative efforts for legal services, including organizations that do not receive Legal Services Corporation funding and are able to represent undocumented residents. iv. In tandem with investments in affordable housing development in low- poverty areas, provide funds for the preservation of affordable housing in areas that are undergoing gentrification or are at risk of gentrification, in particular in areas of high environmental health. v. Encourage the donation of municipally-owned, tax-foreclosed properties to non-profit community land trusts to be rehabilitated, as needed, and preserved for long-term affordable housing. 8. Increase access to opportunity through targeted public investments and efforts to increase economic mobility within Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs). i. Prioritize economic development expenditures in and around R/ECAPs including through the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative. ii. Prioritize funding for job training activities in and around R/ECAPs including for the types of industrial jobs created through the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 222 of ? iii. Prioritize infrastructure and streetscaping improvements in R/ECAPs in order to facilitate local retail development. iv. Engage with small business incubators, like West Contra Costa Small Business Incubator or the Richmond Commercial Kitchen, to expand to R/ECAPs within Contra Costa County or to provide technical assistance to start-up incubators within the County. v. Explore methods for providing low-interest loans and below-market leases for tax-foreclosed commercial properties to low-income residents seeking to start businesses within R/ECAPs. 9. Increase and stabilize access to proficient schools i. Create regular lines of communications between PHAs and staff with county and district school boards and school district staff to ensure that districts take into account the needs of low income residents in redistricting and investment decisions, particularly for residents of public and assisted housing in the region. ii. To the extent possible, focus the development of new family affordable housing in school districts and school zones with lower rates of school- based poverty concentration, and incentivize new market rate multifamily development in high performing school zones to include more bedrooms in affordable apartments for families with children. 10. Increase coordination of housing and environmental health planning to support access to healthy homes and neighborhoods. i. Expand ongoing interagency connections to support weatherization, energy efficiency, and climate adaptation for low-income residents. 11. Improve inter-jurisdictional coordination. i. Explore an ongoing working group of representatives from Consortium, PHA, and local housing and community development staff, along with representatives of local and regional transportation, education, climate/energy, and health agencies. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 223 of ? Technical Appendix Unless otherwise noted, the current data cited below are sourced from the HUD Data and Mapping Tool, the U.S. Census Bureau, and the American Community Survey 2012-2016 5-Year Estimates. Demographic Profile Tables Table 1 - Demographics, Contra Costa County and the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Area Contra Costa County Region Race/Ethnicity # % # % Non-Hispanic White 500,923 47.79% 1,840,372 42.45% Black 93,604 8.92% 349,895 8.07% Asian/Pacific Island 153,263 14.61% 1,024,377 23.63% Native American 2,984 0.28% 10,657 0.25% Two or More Races 39,569 3.77% 157,746 3.64% Other, Non-Hispanic 3,122 0.30% 13,550 0.31% Hispanic 255,560 24.36% 938,794 21.65% National Origin – County Other than USA Where Residents Were Born #1 country of origin Mexico 68,757 6.88% Mexico 256,611 6.19% #2 country of origin Philippines 31,983 3.20% China 187,949 4.54% #3 country of origin China 15,502 1.55% Philippines 160,156 3.87% #4 country of origin India 15,431 1.54% India 85,837 2.07% #5 country of origin El Salvador 12,834 1.28% Vietnam 55,635 1.34% #6 country of origin Korea 6,614 0.66% El Salvador 52,767 1.27% #7 country of origin Vietnam 6,352 0.64% Hong Kong 39,414 0.95% #8 country of origin Iran 5,906 0.59% Korea 29,806 0.72% #9 country of origin Hong Kong 4,708 0.47% Guatemala 27,004 0.65% #10 country of origin Guatemala 4,573 0.46% Taiwan 26,766 0.65% Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Language– Language Spoken by Persons with Limited Skill in English #1 LEP Language Spanish 78,105 7.81% Spanish 310,669 7.50% #2 LEP Language Chinese 15,917 1.59% Chinese 203,434 4.91% #3 LEP Language Tagalog 9,228 0.92% Tagalog 53,027 1.28% #4 LEP Language Korean 3,820 0.38% Vietnamese 26,667 0.64% #5 LEP Language Persian 3,781 0.38% Korean 16,910 0.41% #6 LEP Language Vietnamese 3,520 0.35% Russian 15,321 0.37% #7 LEP Language Other Indic 3,090 0.31% Other Asian 13,968 0.34% #8 LEP Language Other Asian 3,059 0.31% Other Indic 11,716 0.28% #9 LEP Language Russian 2,887 0.29% Persian 10,565 0.26% #10 LEP Language Portuguese 1,745 0.17% Japanese 9,891 0.24% Disability or Difficulty Type 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 224 of ? Hearing 28,044 2.82% 108,299 2.64% Vision 17,330 1.74% 68,538 1.67% Cognitive 39,726 4.00% 154,925 3.77% Ambulatory 55,843 5.62% 219,714 5.35% Self-care 21,796 2.19% 97,192 2.37% Independent living 40,478 4.07% 170,567 4.15% Sex Male 511,526 48.76% 2,137,801 49.31% Female 537,499 51.24% 2,197,590 50.69% Table 2 – Demographic Trends, Contra Costa County, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 225 of ? Contra Costa County 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Race/Ethnicity # % # % # % # % Non-Hispanic White 559,385 69.69% 549,347 57.89% 500,923 47.75% 500,923 47.75% Black 72,410 9.02% 94,039 9.91% 105,105 10.02% 93,604 8.92% Asian/Pacific Island 73,641 9.17% 120,210 12.67% 175,285 16.71% 153,263 14.61% Native American 4,322 0.54% 8,689 0.92% 8,125 0.77% 2,984 0.28% Hispanic 91,083 11.35% 167,718 17.68% 255,560 24.36% 255,560 24.36% National Origin – County Other than USA Where Residents Were Born Foreign-born 106,958 13.33% 180,486 19.02% 241,903 23.06% 250,922 23.92% Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Language– Language Spoken by Persons with Limited Skill in English # of Persons with LEP 54,265 6.76% 101,190 10.66% 129,593 12.35% 136,581 13.02% Sex Male 391,214 48.74% 462,369 48.73% 511,526 48.76% 511,526 48.76% Female 411,409 51.26% 486,447 51.27% 537,499 51.24% 537,499 51.24% Age Under 18 201,430 25.10% 257,094 27.10% 260,505 24.83% 260,505 24.83% 18-64 513,735 64.01% 584,819 61.64% 658,082 62.73% 658,082 62.73% 65+ 87,459 10.90% 106,904 11.27% 130,438 12.43% 130,438 12.43% Family Type Families with children 103,823 48.36% 82,817 50.47% 126,893 47.83% 126,893 47.83% San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Race/Ethnicity # % # % # % # % Non-Hispanic White 2,157,395 58.65% 2,025,815 49.12% 1,840,372 42.45% 1,840,372 42.45% Black 411,437 11.19% 418,830 10.16% 392,843 9.06% 349,895 8.07% Asian/Pacific Island 578,189 15.72% 876,048 21.24% 1,119,174 25.81% 1,024,377 23.63% Native American 16,266 0.44% 30,058 0.73% 27,459 0.63% 10,657 0.25% Hispanic 505,217 13.74% 733,049 17.78% 938,794 21.65% 938,794 21.65% National Origin Foreign-born 778,388 21.17% 1,127,959 27.35% 1,264,467 29.17% 1,310,790 30.23% Limited English Proficiency (LEP) # of Persons with LEP 449,197 12.21% 667,712 16.19% 719,857 16.60% 735,980 16.98% Sex Male 1,808,731 49.18% 2,037,408 49.41% 2,137,801 49.31% 2,137,801 49.31% Female 1,868,981 50.82% 2,086,329 50.59% 2,197,590 50.69% 2,197,590 50.69% Age Under 18 806,480 21.93% 953,037 23.11% 920,636 21.24% 920,636 21.24% 18-64 2,434,697 66.20% 2,687,478 65.17% 2,868,275 66.16% 2,868,275 66.16% 65+ 436,536 11.87% 483,222 11.72% 546,480 12.61% 546,480 12.61% Family Type Families with children 410,719 45.97% 357,466 47.23% 459,242 45.61% 459,242 45.61% Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region for that year, except family type, which is out of total families. Note 2: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details Table 3 – Demographics, City of Antioch, CA 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 226 of ? and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Area Antioch, CA Region Race/Ethnicity # % # % Non-Hispanic White 37,430 36.48% 1,840,372 42.45% Black 16,614 16.19% 349,895 8.07% Asian/Pacific Island 10,798 10.52% 1,024,377 23.63% Native American 460 0.45% 10,657 0.25% Two or More Races 4,655 4.54% 157,746 3.64% Other 252 0.25% 13,550 0.31% Hispanic 32,405 31.58% 938,794 21.65% National Origin – County Other than USA Where Residents Were Born #1 country of origin Mexico 7,477 7.71% Mexico 256,611 6.19% #2 country of origin Philippines 4,160 4.29% China 187,949 4.54% #3 country of origin El Salvador 1,153 1.19% Philippines 160,156 3.87% #4 country of origin Nicaragua 899 0.93% India 85,837 2.07% #5 country of origin Nigeria 636 0.66% Vietnam 55,635 1.34% #6 country of origin Afghanistan 633 0.65% El Salvador 52,767 1.27% #7 country of origin China 563 0.58% Hong Kong 39,414 0.95% #8 country of origin India 514 0.53% Korea 29,806 0.72% #9 country of origin Peru 467 0.48% Guatemala 27,004 0.65% #10 country of origin Fiji 438 0.45% Taiwan 26,766 0.65% Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Language– Language Spoken by Persons with Limited Skill in English #1 LEP Language Spanish 7,553 7.79% Spanish 310,669 7.50% #2 LEP Language Tagalog 1,152 1.19% Chinese 203,434 4.91% #3 LEP Language Chinese 818 0.84% Tagalog 53,027 1.28% #4 LEP Language Persian 470 0.48% Vietnamese 26,667 0.64% #5 LEP Language African 243 0.25% Korean 16,910 0.41% #6 LEP Language Hindi 241 0.25% Russian 15,321 0.37% #7 LEP Language Arabic 221 0.23% Other Asian 13,968 0.34% #8 LEP Language Other Pacific Isl 135 0.14% Other Indic Lang. 11,716 0.28% #9 LEP Language Vietnamese 129 0.13% Persian 10,565 0.26% #10 LEP Language Other Indic 91 0.09% Japanese 9,891 0.24% Disability or Difficulty Type Hearing 3,009 3.11% 108,299 2.64% Vision 2,199 2.27% 68,538 1.67% Cognitive 5,580 5.77% 154,925 3.77% Ambulatory 6,524 6.75% 219,714 5.35% Self-care 2,600 2.69% 97,192 2.37% Independent living 4,646 4.81% 170,567 4.15% Sex Male 49,983 48.71% 2,137,801 49.31% Female 52,633 51.29% 2,197,590 50.69% Age Under 18 28,965 28.23% 920,636 21.24% 18-64 64,600 62.95% 2,868,275 66.16% 65+ 9,051 8.82% 546,480 12.61% 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 227 of ? Family Type Families with children 12,807 50.99% 459,242 45.61% Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except family type, which is out o f total families. Note 2: 10 most populous places of birth and languages at the jurisdiction level may not be the same as the 10 most populous at the Region level, and thus are labeled separately. Note 3: China does not include Hong Kong and Taiwan. Note 4: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS. Note 5: Refer to the Data Documentation for details www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 228 of ? Table 4 – Demographic Trends, City of Antioch and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region City of Antioch 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Race/Ethnicity # % # % # % # % Non-Hispanic White 52,127 76.43% 51,951 57.55% 37,430 36.48% 37,430 36.48% Black 1,699 2.49% 8,597 9.52% 18,615 18.14% 16,614 16.19% Asian/Pacific Island 3,015 4.42% 7,686 8.51% 12,724 12.40% 10,798 10.52% Native American 603 0.88% 1,232 1.36% 1,092 1.06% 460 0.45% Hispanic 10,583 15.52% 19,945 22.09% 32,405 31.58% 32,405 31.58% National Origin Foreign-born 5,262 7.72% 11,679 12.93% 21,680 21.13% 21,123 20.58% Limited English Proficiency - LEP # of Persons with LEP 3,412 5.01% 7,359 8.15% 11,440 11.15% 11,720 11.42% Sex Male 33,391 49.02% 44,428 49.18% 49,983 48.71% 49,983 48.71% Female 34,726 50.98% 45,910 50.82% 52,633 51.29% 52,633 51.29% Age Under 18 21,107 30.99% 29,475 32.63% 28,965 28.23% 28,965 28.23% 18-64 41,975 61.62% 54,023 59.80% 64,600 62.95% 64,600 62.95% 65+ 5,034 7.39% 6,841 7.57% 9,051 8.82% 9,051 8.82% Family Type Families with children 10,549 57.46% 10,044 58.60% 12,807 50.99% 12,807 50.99% San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Race/Ethnicity # % # % # % # % Non-Hispanic White 2,157,395 58.65% 2,025,815 49.12% 1,840,372 42.45% 1,840,372 42.45% Black 411,437 11.19% 418,830 10.16% 392,843 9.06% 349,895 8.07% Asian/Pacific Island 578,189 15.72% 876,048 21.24% 1,119,174 25.81% 1,024,377 23.63% Native American 16,266 0.44% 30,058 0.73% 27,459 0.63% 10,657 0.25% Hispanic 505,217 13.74% 733,049 17.78% 938,794 21.65% 938,794 21.65% National Origin Foreign-born 778,388 21.17% 1,127,959 27.35% 1,264,467 29.17% 1,310,790 30.23% Limited English Proficiency - LEP # of Persons with LEP 449,197 12.21% 667,712 16.19% 719,857 16.60% 735,980 16.98% Sex Male 1,808,731 49.18% 2,037,408 49.41% 2,137,801 49.31% 2,137,801 49.31% Female 1,868,981 50.82% 2,086,329 50.59% 2,197,590 50.69% 2,197,590 50.69% Age Under 18 806,480 21.93% 953,037 23.11% 920,636 21.24% 920,636 21.24% 18-64 2,434,697 66.20% 2,687,478 65.17% 2,868,275 66.16% 2,868,275 66.16% 65+ 436,536 11.87% 483,222 11.72% 546,480 12.61% 546,480 12.61% Family Type Families with children 410,719 45.97% 357,466 47.23% 459,242 45.61% 459,242 45.61% Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region for that year, except family type, which is out of total families. Note 2: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS. Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 229 of ? Table 5 – Disability by Type, Antioch, CA and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Area Antioch, CA Region Disability Type # % # % Hearing 3,009 3.11% 108,299 2.64% Vision 2,199 2.27% 68,538 1.67% Cognitive 5,580 5.77% 154,925 3.77% Ambulatory 6,524 6.75% 219,714 5.35% Self-care 2,600 2.69% 97,192 2.37% Independent living 4,646 4.81% 170,567 4.15% Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region. Note 2: Data Sources: ACS. Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 6 - Demographics, City of Concord and the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Area City of Concord Region Race/Ethnicity # % # % Non-Hispanic White 62,146 50.70% 1,840,372 42.45% Black 3,980 3.25% 349,895 8.07% Asian/Pacific Island 13,967 11.40% 1,024,377 23.63% Native American 366 0.30% 10,657 0.25% Two or More Races 4,655 3.80% 157,746 3.64% Other, Non-Hispanic 320 0.26% 13,550 0.31% Hispanic 37,132 30.30% 938,794 21.65% National Origin #1 country of origin Mexico 10,574 9.24% Mexico 256,611 6.19% #2 country of origin Philippines 3,678 3.21% China 187,949 4.54% #3 country of origin El Salvador 2,524 2.20% Philippines 160,156 3.87% #4 country of origin China 1,289 1.13% India 85,837 2.07% #5 country of origin India 1,017 0.89% Vietnam 55,635 1.34% #6 country of origin Afghanistan 979 0.86% El Salvador 52,767 1.27% #7 country of origin Guatemala 932 0.81% Hong Kong 39,414 0.95% #8 country of origin Korea 763 0.67% Korea 29,806 0.72% #9 country of origin Vietnam 679 0.59% Guatemala 27,004 0.65% #10 country of origin Russia 635 0.55% Taiwan 26,766 0.65% Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Language– Language Spoken by Persons with Limited Skill in English #1 LEP Language Spanish 12,572 10.98% Spanish 310,669 7.50% #2 LEP Language Chinese 1,306 1.14% Chinese 203,434 4.91% #3 LEP Language Tagalog 1,041 0.91% Tagalog 53,027 1.28% #4 LEP Language Russian 703 0.61% Vietnamese 26,667 0.64% #5 LEP Language Persian 634 0.55% Korean 16,910 0.41% #6 LEP Language Korean 525 0.46% Russian 15,321 0.37% #7 LEP Language Vietnamese 510 0.45% Other Asian 13,968 0.34% 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 230 of ? #8 LEP Language Other Asian 297 0.26% Other Indic 11,716 0.28% #9 LEP Language Portuguese 287 0.25% Persian 10,565 0.26% #10 LEP Language Other Pacific Isl 246 0.21% Japanese 9,891 0.24% Disability Type Hearing difficulty 3,409 3.00% 108,299 2.64% Vision difficulty 2,264 1.99% 68,538 1.67% Cognitive difficulty 4,734 4.16% 154,925 3.77% Ambulatory difficulty 6,817 6.00% 219,714 5.35% Self-care difficulty 2,357 2.07% 97,192 2.37% Independent living 4,439 3.90% 170,567 4.15% Sex Male 60,819 49.62% 2,137,801 49.31% Female 61,746 50.38% 2,197,590 50.69% Age Under 18 28,078 22.91% 920,636 21.24% 18-64 79,725 65.05% 2,868,275 66.16% 65+ 14,762 12.04% 546,480 12.61% Family Type Families with children 13,919 45.96% 459,242 45.61% Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except family type, which is out of tota l families. Note 2: 10 most populous places of birth and languages at the jurisdiction level may not be the same as the 10 most populous at the Region level, and are thus labeled separately. Note 3: China does not include Hong Kong and Taiwan. 4: Refer to the Data Documentation for details www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 231 of ? Table 7 – Demographic Trends, Concord, CA and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Area City of Concord 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Race/Ethnicity # % # % # % # % Non-Hispanic White 84,672 77.53% 74,727 61.44% 62,146 50.70% 62,146 50.70% Black 2,418 2.21% 4,018 3.30% 5,033 4.11% 3,980 3.25% Asian/Pacific Island 8,890 8.14% 13,861 11.40% 16,693 13.62% 13,967 11.40% Native American 600 0.55% 1,335 1.10% 1,124 0.92% 366 0.30% Hispanic 12,404 11.36% 26,221 21.56% 37,132 30.30% 37,132 30.30% National Origin Foreign-born 15,507 14.23% 28,389 23.34% 32,522 26.53% 31,238 25.49% Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Language # of Persons with LEP 7,595 6.97% 17,026 14.00% 19,835 16.18% 19,023 15.52% Sex Male 53,346 48.97% 60,044 49.37% 60,819 49.62% 60,819 49.62% Female 55,594 51.03% 61,584 50.63% 61,746 50.38% 61,746 50.38% Age Under 18 26,466 24.29% 31,239 25.68% 28,078 22.91% 28,078 22.91% 18-64 72,010 66.10% 77,047 63.35% 79,725 65.05% 79,725 65.05% 65+ 10,462 9.60% 13,343 10.97% 14,762 12.04% 14,762 12.04% Family Type Families with children 14,117 49.21% 12,387 49.14% 13,919 45.96% 13,919 45.96% San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region Race/Ethnicity 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current # % # % # % # % Non-Hispanic White 2,157,395 58.65% 2,025,815 49.12% 1,840,372 42.45% 1,840,372 42.45% Black 411,437 11.19% 418,830 10.16% 392,843 9.06% 349,895 8.07% Asian/Pacific Island 578,189 15.72% 876,048 21.24% 1,119,174 25.81% 1,024,377 23.63% Native American 16,266 0.44% 30,058 0.73% 27,459 0.63% 10,657 0.25% Hispanic 505,217 13.74% 733,049 17.78% 938,794 21.65% 938,794 21.65% National Origin Foreign-born 778,388 21.17% 1,127,959 27.35% 1,264,467 29.17% 1,310,790 30.23% Limited English Proficiency # of Persons with LEP 449,197 12.21% 667,712 16.19% 719,857 16.60% 735,980 16.98% Sex Male 1,808,731 49.18% 2,037,408 49.41% 2,137,801 49.31% 2,137,801 49.31% Female 1,868,981 50.82% 2,086,329 50.59% 2,197,590 50.69% 2,197,590 50.69% Age Under 18 806,480 21.93% 953,037 23.11% 920,636 21.24% 920,636 21.24% 18-64 2,434,697 66.20% 2,687,478 65.17% 2,868,275 66.16% 2,868,275 66.16% 65+ 436,536 11.87% 483,222 11.72% 546,480 12.61% 546,480 12.61% Family Type Families with children 410,719 45.97% 357,466 47.23% 459,242 45.61% 459,242 45.61% Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region for that year, except family type, which is out of total families. Note 2: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 232 of ? Table 8 – Disability by Type, Concord, CA, and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Area City of Concord Region Disability Type # % # % Hearing difficulty 3,409 3.00% 108,299 2.64% Vision difficulty 2,264 1.99% 68,538 1.67% Cognitive difficulty 4,734 4.16% 154,925 3.77% Ambulatory difficulty 6,817 6.00% 219,714 5.35% Self-care difficulty 2,357 2.07% 97,192 2.37% Independent living difficulty 4,439 3.90% 170,567 4.15% Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region. Note 2: Data Sources: ACS. Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 9 – Demographics, City of Pittsburg and the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Area City of Pittsburg Region Race/Ethnicity # % # % Non-Hispanic White 12,876 20.41% 1,840,372 42.45% Black 10,704 16.97% 349,895 8.07% Asian/Pacific Island 10,184 16.14% 1,024,377 23.63% Native American 208 0.33% 10,657 0.25% Two or More Races 2,338 3.71% 157,746 3.64% Other, Non-Hispanic 177 0.28% 13,550 0.31% Hispanic 26,598 42.16% 938,794 21.65% National Origin #1 country of origin Mexico 8,708 14.51% Mexico 256,611 6.19% #2 country of origin Philippines 3,858 6.43% China 187,949 4.54% #3 country of origin El Salvador 1,394 2.32% Philippines 160,156 3.87% #4 country of origin India 710 1.18% India 85,837 2.07% #5 country of origin Vietnam 690 1.15% Vietnam 55,635 1.34% #6 country of origin Nicaragua 649 1.08% El Salvador 52,767 1.27% #7 country of origin China 501 0.84% Hong Kong 39,414 0.95% #8 country of origin Peru 329 0.55% Korea 29,806 0.72% #9 country of origin Honduras 305 0.51% Guatemala 27,004 0.65% #10 country of origin Afghanistan 250 0.42% Taiwan 26,766 0.65% Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Language– Language Spoken by Persons with Limited Skill in English #1 LEP Language Spanish 9,819 16.37% Spanish 310,669 7.50% #2 LEP Language Tagalog 1,359 2.27% Chinese 203,434 4.91% #3 LEP Language Vietnamese 457 0.76% Tagalog 53,027 1.28% #4 LEP Language Chinese 413 0.69% Vietnamese 26,667 0.64% 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 233 of ? #5 LEP Language Other Pac Isl 304 0.51% Korean 16,910 0.41% #6 LEP Language Other Indic 272 0.45% Russian 15,321 0.37% #7 LEP Language Korean 177 0.30% Other Asian 13,968 0.34% #8 LEP Language Persian 91 0.15% Other Indic 11,716 0.28% #9 LEP Language Hindi 89 0.15% Persian 10,565 0.26% #10 LEP Language Arabic 64 0.11% Japanese 9,891 0.24% Disability Type Hearing difficulty 1,727 2.89% 108,299 2.64% Vision difficulty 1,650 2.76% 68,538 1.67% Cognitive difficulty 3,552 5.94% 154,925 3.77% Ambulatory difficulty 4,631 7.75% 219,714 5.35% Self-care difficulty 1,677 2.81% 97,192 2.37% Independent living 3,055 5.11% 170,567 4.15% Sex Male 30,748 48.74% 2,137,801 49.31% Female 32,336 51.26% 2,197,590 50.69% Age Under 18 17,407 27.59% 920,636 21.24% 18-64 40,296 63.88% 2,868,275 66.16% 65+ 5,381 8.53% 546,480 12.61% Family Type Families with children 7,548 50.95% 459,242 45.61% Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except family type, which is out of total families. Note 2: 10 most populous places of birth and languages at the jurisdiction level may not be the same as the 10 most populous at the Region level, and are thus labeled separately. Note 3: China does not include Hong Kong and Taiwan. Note 4: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS. Note 5: Refer to the Data Documentation for details www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 234 of ? Table 10 – Demographic Trends, Pittsburg, CA and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Area City of Pittsburg 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Race/Ethnicity # % # % # % # % Non-Hispanic White 23,420 47.87% 18,069 31.62% 12,876 20.41% 12,876 20.41% Black 8,232 16.83% 11,297 19.77% 11,767 18.65% 10,704 16.97% Asian/Pacific Island 5,417 11.07% 8,265 14.46% 11,211 17.77% 10,184 16.14% Native American 291 0.59% 513 0.90% 422 0.67% 208 0.33% Hispanic 11,431 23.37% 18,356 32.13% 26,598 42.16% 26,598 42.16% National Origin Foreign-born 9,067 18.56% 14,084 24.68% 19,358 30.69% 19,977 31.67% Limited English Proficiency (LEP) # of persons with LEP 5,589 11.44% 9,385 16.45% 12,477 19.78% 13,196 20.92% Sex Male 24,140 49.40% 28,383 49.74% 30,748 48.74% 30,748 48.74% Female 24,729 50.60% 28,685 50.26% 32,336 51.26% 32,336 51.26% Age Under 18 15,030 30.76% 17,969 31.49% 17,407 27.59% 17,407 27.59% 18-64 30,037 61.46% 34,376 60.24% 40,296 63.88% 40,296 63.88% 65+ 3,802 7.78% 4,723 8.28% 5,381 8.53% 5,381 8.53% Family Type Families with children 7,052 56.48% 5,674 54.78% 7,548 50.95% 7,548 50.95% San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Race/Ethnicity # % # % # % # % Non-Hispanic White 2,157,395 58.65% 2,025,815 49.12% 1,840,372 42.45% 1,840,372 42.45% Black 411,437 11.19% 418,830 10.16% 392,843 9.06% 349,895 8.07% Asian/Pacific Islander 578,189 15.72% 876,048 21.24% 1,119,174 25.81% 1,024,377 23.63% Native American 16,266 0.44% 30,058 0.73% 27,459 0.63% 10,657 0.25% Hispanic 505,217 13.74% 733,049 17.78% 938,794 21.65% 938,794 21.65% National Origin Foreign-born 778,388 21.17% 1,127,959 27.35% 1,264,467 29.17% 1,310,790 30.23% Limited English Proficiency (LEP) # of persons with LEP 449,197 12.21% 667,712 16.19% 719,857 16.60% 735,980 16.98% Sex Male 1,808,731 49.18% 2,037,408 49.41% 2,137,801 49.31% 2,137,801 49.31% Female 1,868,981 50.82% 2,086,329 50.59% 2,197,590 50.69% 2,197,590 50.69% Age Under 18 806,480 21.93% 953,037 23.11% 920,636 21.24% 920,636 21.24% 18-64 2,434,697 66.20% 2,687,478 65.17% 2,868,275 66.16% 2,868,275 66.16% 65+ 436,536 11.87% 483,222 11.72% 546,480 12.61% 546,480 12.61% Family Type Families with children 410,719 45.97% 357,466 47.23% 459,242 45.61% 459,242 45.61% 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 235 of ? Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region for that year, except family type, which is out of total families. Note 2: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details Table 11 – Disability by Type, Pittsburg, CA and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Area Pittsburg, CA Region Disability Type # % # % Hearing difficulty 1,727 2.89% 108,299 2.64% Vision difficulty 1,650 2.76% 68,538 1.67% Cognitive difficulty 3,552 5.94% 154,925 3.77% Ambulatory difficulty 4,631 7.75% 219,714 5.35% Self-care difficulty 1,677 2.81% 97,192 2.37% Independent living difficulty 3,055 5.11% 170,567 4.15% Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region. Note 2: Data Sources: ACS. Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 12 – Demographics, City of Walnut Creek and the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Area City of Walnut Creek Region Race/Ethnicity # % # % Non-Hispanic White 47,279 73.63% 1,840,372 42.45% Black 967 1.51% 349,895 8.07% Asian/Pacific Island 8,083 12.59% 1,024,377 23.63% Native American 105 0.16% 10,657 0.25% Two or More Races 2,085 3.25% 157,746 3.64% Other, Non-Hispanic 156 0.24% 13,550 0.31% Hispanic 5,533 8.62% 938,794 21.65% National Origin #1 country of origin Mexico 1,124 1.80% Mexico 256,611 6.19% #2 country of origin China 1,054 1.69% China 187,949 4.54% #3 country of origin Iran 962 1.54% Philippines 160,156 3.87% #4 country of origin India 878 1.41% India 85,837 2.07% #5 country of origin Philippines 823 1.32% Vietnam 55,635 1.34% #6 country of origin Korea 750 1.20% El Salvador 52,767 1.27% #7 country of origin Russia 579 0.93% Hong Kong 39,414 0.95% #8 country of origin England 471 0.75% Korea 29,806 0.72% #9 country of origin Ukraine 454 0.73% Guatemala 27,004 0.65% #10 country of origin Canada 435 0.70% Taiwan 26,766 0.65% Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Language– Language Spoken by Persons with Limited Skill in English #1 LEP Language Spanish 1,333 2.13% Spanish 310,669 7.50% #2 LEP Language Chinese 917 1.47% Chinese 203,434 4.91% #3 LEP Language Russian 837 1.34% Tagalog 53,027 1.28% #4 LEP Language Korean 415 0.66% Vietnamese 26,667 0.64% #5 LEP Language Persian 270 0.43% Korean 16,910 0.41% 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 236 of ? #6 LEP Language Other Indic 248 0.40% Russian 15,321 0.37% #7 LEP Language African 235 0.38% Other Asian 13,968 0.34% #8 LEP Language Other Slavic 152 0.24% Other Indic 11,716 0.28% #9 LEP Language Arabic 150 0.24% Persian 10,565 0.26% #10 LEP Language Other Asian 138 0.22% Japanese 9,891 0.24% Disability Type Hearing difficulty 2,626 4.25% 108,299 2.64% Vision difficulty 1,161 1.88% 68,538 1.67% Cognitive difficulty 2,020 3.27% 154,925 3.77% Ambulatory difficulty 4,250 6.88% 219,714 5.35% Self-care difficulty 1,405 2.28% 97,192 2.37% Independent living 2,997 4.85% 170,567 4.15% Sex Male 29,915 46.59% 2,137,801 49.31% Female 34,293 53.41% 2,197,590 50.69% Age Under 18 11,011 17.15% 920,636 21.24% 18-64 36,745 57.23% 2,868,275 66.16% 65+ 16,453 25.62% 546,480 12.61% Family Type Families with children 6,157 37.60% 459,242 45.61% Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except family type, which is out o f total families. Note 2: 10 most populous places of birth and languages at the jurisdiction level may not be the same as the 10 mo st populous at the Region level, and are thus labeled separately. Note 3: China does not include Hong Kong and Taiwan. Note 4: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS. Note 5: Refer to the Data Documentation for details www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 237 of ? Table 13 – Demographic Trends, Walnut Creek CA and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Area City of Walnut Creek 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Race/Ethnicity # % # % # % # % Non-Hispanic White 52,517 87.23% 51,524 80.42% 47,279 73.63% 47,279 73.63% Black 591 0.98% 872 1.36% 1,311 2.04% 967 1.51% Asian/Pacific Island 4,030 6.69% 6,928 10.81% 9,518 14.82% 8,083 12.59% Native American 131 0.22% 366 0.57% 350 0.55% 105 0.16% Hispanic 2,856 4.74% 3,840 5.99% 5,533 8.62% 5,533 8.62% National Origin Foreign-born 7,742 12.83% 11,374 17.76% 12,851 20.01% 14,100 21.96% LEP Persons with LEP 2,581 4.28% 4,012 6.26% 4,468 6.96% 4,983 7.76% Sex Male 28,015 46.44% 29,802 46.53% 29,915 46.59% 29,915 46.59% Female 32,311 53.56% 34,248 53.47% 34,293 53.41% 34,293 53.41% Age Under 18 10,376 17.20% 11,776 18.39% 11,011 17.15% 11,011 17.15% 18-64 36,788 60.98% 36,991 57.75% 36,745 57.23% 36,745 57.23% 65+ 13,162 21.82% 15,283 23.86% 16,453 25.62% 16,453 25.62% Family Type Families with children 5,840 36.10% 5,488 43.00% 6,157 37.60% 6,157 37.60% San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Race/Ethnicity # % # % # % # % Non-Hispanic White 2,157,395 58.65% 2,025,815 49.12% 1,840,372 42.45% 1,840,372 42.45% Black 411,437 11.19% 418,830 10.16% 392,843 9.06% 349,895 8.07% Asian/Pacific Island 578,189 15.72% 876,048 21.24% 1,119,174 25.81% 1,024,377 23.63% Native American 16,266 0.44% 30,058 0.73% 27,459 0.63% 10,657 0.25% Hispanic 505,217 13.74% 733,049 17.78% 938,794 21.65% 938,794 21.65% National Origin Foreign-born 778,388 21.17% 1,127,959 27.35% 1,264,467 29.17% 1,310,790 30.23% Limited English Proficiency (LEP) – Persons with Limited Skill in English Persons with LEP 449,197 12.21% 667,712 16.19% 719,857 16.60% 735,980 16.98% Sex Male 1,808,731 49.18% 2,037,408 49.41% 2,137,801 49.31% 2,137,801 49.31% Female 1,868,981 50.82% 2,086,329 50.59% 2,197,590 50.69% 2,197,590 50.69% Age Under 18 806,480 21.93% 953,037 23.11% 920,636 21.24% 920,636 21.24% 18-64 2,434,697 66.20% 2,687,478 65.17% 2,868,275 66.16% 2,868,275 66.16% 65+ 436,536 11.87% 483,222 11.72% 546,480 12.61% 546,480 12.61% Family Type Families with children 410,719 45.97% 357,466 47.23% 459,242 45.61% 459,242 45.61% 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 238 of ? Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region for that year, except family type, which is out of total families. Note 2: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details Table 14 – Disability by Type, Walnut Creek, CA and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Metropolitan Area Walnut Creek, CA Region Disability Type # % # % Hearing difficulty 2,626 4.25% 108,299 2.64% Vision difficulty 1,161 1.88% 68,538 1.67% Cognitive difficulty 2,020 3.27% 154,925 3.77% Ambulatory difficulty 4,250 6.88% 219,714 5.35% Self-care difficulty 1,405 2.28% 97,192 2.37% Independent living difficulty 2,997 4.85% 170,567 4.15% Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region. Note 2: Data Sources: ACS. Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data- documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 239 of ? Segregation and Integration Tables Table 1 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends, Contra Costa County and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region Contra Costa County Region Race/Ethnicity 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Non-White/White 41.19 41.95 41.86 44.93 44.67 44.68 43.10 45.89 Black/White 67.52 62.54 58.42 61.80 66.72 63.71 59.29 63.49 Asian or Pacific Islander/White 34.89 32.73 35.67 40.55 45.55 44.94 44.33 48.21 Hispanic/White 36.70 45.24 48.07 49.49 43.56 49.67 49.59 51.24 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census. Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 2 – Isolation and Exposure Indices in the San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Region Race/Ethnicity Not Hispanic Hispanic White Black Asian/Pacific Island (all races) Not Hispanic White 56.3 5.9 21.2 15.7 Black 27.5 23.2 21.4 27.0 Asian/Pacific Island 34.7 7.5 39.0 18.0 Hispanic 30.8 11.3 21.5 35.5 Note 1: Data Source: 2010 Census442 Table 3 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends, City of Antioch and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region Antioch Region Race/Ethnicity 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Non-White/White 9.60 12.55 17.06 19.40 44.67 44.68 43.10 45.89 Black/White 26.15 22.28 23.96 29.12 66.72 63.71 59.29 63.49 Asian or Pacific Islander/White 22.02 24.40 32.01 35.34 45.55 44.94 44.33 48.21 Hispanic/White 12.86 17.18 15.12 16.04 43.56 49.67 49.59 51.24 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census. Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation 442 San Francisco-Oakland-Freemont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area, America Communities Project, https://s4.ad.brown.edu/projects/diversity/segregation2010/msa.aspx?metroid=41860. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 240 of ? Table 4 – Isolation and Exposure Indices, Antioch Race/Ethnicity Not Hispanic Hispanic White Black Asian/Pacific Islander (all races) Not Hispanic White 38.1 17.2 11.8 31.6 Black 33.0 20.7 14.4 30.6 Asian 32.9 21.1 16.7 27.0 Hispanic 35.5 18.0 11.3 33.8 Note: Data Source 2010 Census443 Table 5 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends, City of Concord and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region Concord Region Race/Ethnicity 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Not Hispanic Non-White/White 14.81 25.08 27.97 31.72 44.67 44.68 43.10 45.89 Black/White 23.87 25.53 27.30 36.85 66.72 63.71 59.29 63.49 Asian/Pacific Islander/White 16.76 16.57 14.77 22.21 45.55 44.94 44.33 48.21 Hispanic/White 18.06 34.30 38.12 40.10 43.56 49.67 49.59 51.24 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census. Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 6 – Isolation and Exposure Indices, Concord Race/Ethnicity Not Hispanic Hispanic White Black Asian/Pacific Islander (all races) Not Hispanic White 56.3 3.8 14.5 24.2 Black 46.2 4.8 13.4 34.4 Asian 52.8 4.0 15.0 27.0 Hispanic 39.8 4.7 12.1 42.3 Note: Data Source: 2010 Census444 443 San Francisco-Oakland-Freemont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area, America Communities Project, https://s4.ad.brown.edu/projects/diversity/segregation2010/msa.aspx?metroid=41860. 444 San Francisco-Oakland-Freemont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area, America Communities Project, https://s4.ad.brown.edu/projects/diversity/segregation2010/msa.aspx?metroid=41860. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 241 of ? Table 7 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends, City of Pittsburg and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region Pittsburg Region Race/Ethnicity 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Non-White/White 21.80 20.83 16.68 20.47 44.67 44.68 43.10 45.89 Black/White 27.92 23.11 21.32 28.97 66.72 63.71 59.29 63.49 Asian or Pacific Islander/White 16.12 21.25 20.96 28.84 45.55 44.94 44.33 48.21 Hispanic/White 23.31 27.23 22.75 23.67 43.56 49.67 49.59 51.24 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census. Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 8 – Isolation and Exposure Indices, Pittsburg Race/Ethnicity Not Hispanic Hispanic White Black Asian/Pacific Islander (any race) Not Hispanic White 21.9 18.4 17.8 40.9 Black 19.8 21.5 16.0 41.8 Asian 19.9 16.7 24.2 38.4 Hispanic 19.3 18.4 16.2 45.2 Note: Data Source 2010 Census445 Table 9 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends, City of Walnut Creek and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region Walnut Creek Region Race/Ethnicity 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current 1990 Trend 2000 Trend 2010 Trend Current Non-White/White 18.46 17.35 17.18 19.63 44.67 44.68 43.10 45.89 Black/White 26.40 23.29 26.25 32.32 66.72 63.71 59.29 63.49 Asian/Pacific Island/White 20.04 18.20 16.32 19.23 45.55 44.94 44.33 48.21 Hispanic/White 23.47 26.69 24.83 27.38 43.56 49.67 49.59 51.24 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census. Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 10 – Isolation and Exposure Indices, Walnut Creek Race/Ethnicity Not Hispanic Hispanic White Black Asian/Pacific Islander (any race) Not Hispanic White 74.4 2.0 14.6 8.2 Black 69.7 2.8 16.0 10.6 Asian 71.8 2.3 16.1 9.0 Hispanic 69.8 2.6 15.6 11.1 445 San Francisco-Oakland-Freemont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area, America Communities Project, https://s4.ad.brown.edu/projects/diversity/segregation2010/msa.aspx?metroid=41860. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 242 of ? Note: Data Source 2010 Census446 Table 11 – Isolation and Exposure to Non-Hispanic Whites, San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area (1980 -2010) Race or Ethnicity Isolation Exposure to Non-Hispanic Whites 1980 1990 1980 1990 1980 1990 1980 1990 Non-Hispanic White 75.8 70 62.5 56.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A Black 50.8 41.4 31.6 23.2 29.7 29.2 27.4 27.5 Asian 23.0 38.6 34.3 39.0 54.9 47.3 39.9 34.7 Hispanic 19.6 24.3 31.4 35.5 57.3 47.4 35.6 30.8 Table 13 – Isolation and Exposure to Non-Hispanic Whites, Concord (1980-2010) Race or Ethnicity Isolation Exposure to Non-Hispanic Whites 1980 1990 2000 2010 1980 1990 2000 2010 Not Hispanic White 85.9 77.8 64.8 56.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A Black 2.7 3.3 5.1 4.8 83.7 73.8 54.6 46.2 Asian 5.6 9.3 12.6 15.0 84.0 76.4 61.0 52.8 Hispanic 7.5 13.3 31.4 42.3 85.4 75.1 51.0 39.8 Table 14 – Isolation and Exposure to Non-Hispanic Whites, Pittsburg (1980-2010) Race or Ethnicity Isolation Exposure to Non-Hispanic Whites 1980 1990 2000 2010 1980 1990 2000 2010 Not Hispanic White 58.5 50.3 34.4 21.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A Black 32.9 23.8 23.2 21.5 42.3 41.9 29.3 19.8 Asian 6.8 13 18.9 24.2 57.2 48 31.6 19.9 Hispanic 22.4 27.6 36.4 45.2 50.8 44.3 28.9 19.3 446 San Francisco-Oakland-Freemont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area, America Communities Project, https://s4.ad.brown.edu/projects/diversity/segregation2010/msa.aspx?metroid=41860. Table 12 – Isolation and Exposure to Non-Hispanic Whites, Antioch (1980-2010) Race or Ethnicity Isolation Exposure to Non-Hispanic Whites 1980 1990 2000 2010 1980 1990 2000 2010 Not-Hispanic White 81.4 76.5 57.2 38.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A Black 2.3 3.5 12.5 20.7 80.0 74.3 53.0 33.0 Asian 2.2 6.0 11.6 16.7 81.1 76.0 54.6 32.9 Hispanic 14.4 16.7 24.6 33.8 80.9 75.6 54.6 35.5 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 243 of ? Table 15 – Isolation and Exposure to Non-Hispanic Whites, Walnut Creek (1980-2010) Race or Ethnicity Isolation Exposure to Non-Hispanic Whites 1980 1990 2000 2010 1980 1990 2000 2010 Not Hispanic White 91.5 87.8 81.2 74.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A Black 1 1.4 1.7 2.8 89.5 84.9 78.1 69.7 Asian 5.8 8.6 12 16.1 88.4 85 74.3 71.8 Hispanic 3.9 6.5 8.3 11.1 89.9 84.8 77.1 69.8 Table 16 – Foreclosure Rate, January 1, 2007 – June 30, 2008 HUD Neighborhood Stabilization Program Data City Foreclosure Rate San Pablo 9.5% Pittsburg 9.2% Richmond 9.1% Antioch 7.7% Oakley 6.2% Concord 6.0% Pinole 5.9% Hercules 5.8% Brentwood 5.4% Clayton 4.1% Martinez 4.1% El Cerrito 4.0% Pleasant Hill 3.8% Moraga 3.3% Orinda 3.2% Walnut Creek 3.0% San Ramon 2.2% Danville 2.1% Lafayette 1.7% 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 244 of ? Table 17 – Minority Religious Congregations and Non-Profit Organizations by Place, Urban Institute City Buddhist Muslim Bahai Hindu Jewish Sikh Ravidassia Antioch 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 Concord 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 Pittsburg 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 Walnut Creek 0 2 1 1 5 0 0 Contra Costa County Bay Point 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Brentwood 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Clayton 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Danville 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 El Cerrito 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 El Sobrante 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 Hercules 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Lafayette 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 Martinez 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Moraga 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 Orinda 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Pleasant Hill 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Richmond 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 San Ramon 2 0 1 2 0 0 0 Table 18 – Loan Application Denials, Oakland-Hayward, Berkeley, CA Region Race/Ethnicity FHA, FSA/ RHA, and VA Home- Purchase Loans Conventional Home-Purchase Loans Refinance Loans Home Improvement Loans Multi-Family Homes Not Hispanic White 9.2% 8.0% 16.6% 19.5% 9.5% Black 14.8% 13.5% 27.1% 34.6% 29.4% Asian 13.1% 9.8% 15.2% 19.3% 12.3% Hispanic 11.3% 12.0% 22.3% 31.0% 28.6% 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 245 of ? Table 19 – Bedroom Occupancy Guidelines for Voucher Holders, Contra Costa County Bedroom Size Minimum Number of Persons Maximum Number of Persons 0 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 4 3 3 6 4 4 8 5 5 10 Table 20 -Uniform Physical Condition Standards for Vouchers Guidelines, Pittsburg, CA Voucher Size Minimum persons in household Maximum persons in unit 0 bedroom 1 1 1 bedroom 1 4 2 bedrooms 2 6 3 bedrooms 3 8 4 bedrooms 4 10 5 bedrooms 6 12 6 bedrooms 8 14 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 246 of ? Maps Map 1 - Race/Ethnicity, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 247 of ? Map 2 – National Origin, Contra Costa County Map 3 – Limited English Proficiency, Contra Costa County KEY Orange: Mexico Green: The Philippines Blue: China, excl. Hong Kong & Taiwan Purple: India Black: El Salvador 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 248 of ? Map 4 - Race/Ethnicity, Antioch KEY Orange: Spanish Green: Chinese Blue: Tagalog Purple: Korean Black: Persian 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 249 of ? Map 5 - National Origin, Antioch Map 6 - Limited English Proficiency, Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 250 of ? Map 7 - Race/Ethnicity, Concord Map 8 - National Origin, Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 251 of ? Map 9 – Limited English Proficiency, Concord Map 10 – Race/Ethnicity, Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 252 of ? Map 11 – National Origin, Pittsburg Map 12 - Limited English Proficiency, Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 253 of ? Map 13 - Race/Ethnicity, Walnut Creek Map 14 – National Origin, Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 254 of ? Map 15 - Limited English Proficiency, Walnut Creek Map 16 – Owner Occupied Housing by Percentage, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 255 of ? Map 17 - Owner Occupied Housing by Percentage, Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 256 of ? Map 17 - Owner Occupied Housing by Percentage, Concord Map 18 - Owner Occupied Housing by Percentage, Pittsburg Map 20 – Owner Occupied Housing by Percentage, Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 257 of ? Map 21 - General Plan Land Use Element, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 258 of ? Map 22 – Urban Limit Line, Contra Costa County Map 23: Households by Type, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 259 of ? Map 24 – Urban Displacement, Contra Costa County Map 25 – Food Deserts in west County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 260 of ? Map 26 – Food Deserts in central County Map 27 – Food Deserts in south-central County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 261 of ? Map 28 - Food Deserts in east County Map 29 – Median Year Structure Built, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 262 of ? Map 30 - Units in Structure, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 263 of ? Map 31 – Publicly Supported Housing and Race/Ethnicity, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 264 of ? Map 32 - “Affordable” Options and BART Stations, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 265 of ? Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs) Tables Table 1 R/ECAP Population by Race and Ethnicity and Top National Origins, Contra Costa County and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward CA Region Contra Costa County Region Race/Ethnicity # % # % Total Population in R/ECAPS 69,326 - 142,522 - Non-Hispanic White 9,138 13.18% 18.56% 18.56% Black 12,273 17.70% 22.89% 22.89% Asian/Pacific Islander 7,636 11.01% 36,557 25.65% Native American 79 0.11% 507 0.36% Two or More Races 2,975 4.29% -- --447 Other, Non-Hispanic 171 0.25% 415 0.29% Hispanic 5,533 53.45% 41,076 28.82% National Origin #1 country of origin Mexico 13,569 19.57% Mexico 14,138 9.92% #2 country of origin El Salvador 3,226 4.65% China 11,052 7.75% #3 country of origin The Philippines 2,379 3.43% Vietnam 3,403 2.39% #4 country of origin Guatemala 1,031 1.49% Philippines 3,245 2.28% #5 country of origin China 801 1.16% El Salvador 2,326 1.63% #6 country of origin Nicaragua 795 1.15% Korea 1,615 1.13% #7 country of origin India 566 0.82% Guatemala 1,294 0.91% #8 country of origin Vietnam 389 0.56% India 757 0.53% #9 country of origin Peru 364 0.53% Hong Kong 735 0.52% #10 country of origin Afghanistan 329 0.47% Ukraine 693 0.49% Table 2 R/ECAP Family Type, Contra Costa County and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward CA Region County R/ECAP Family Type County Family Type Total Families in R/ECAPs 14,761 - 285,345 - Families with children 8,847 59.93% 127,640 44.73% Families without children 5,014 40.07% 157,705 55.27% Region R/ECAP Family Type Region Family Type Total Families in R/ECAPs 23,826 - 1,085,283 - Families with children 11,702 49.11% 464,918 42.84% Families without children 12,124 50.89% 620,365 57.16% 447 The American Community Survey does not disaggregate this data by Two or More Races, so this statistic is unavailable for comparison in this chart. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 266 of ? Maps Map 1: Expanded R/ECAPs, Contra Costa County Map 2 – San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region R/ECAPs in 1990 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 267 of ? Map 3 – San Francisco- Oakland-Hayward Region R/ECAPs in 2000 Map 4 – San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region R/ECAPs in 2010 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 268 of ? Map 5 – Contra Costa County R/ECAPs in 1990 Map 6 – Contra Costa County R/ECAPs in 2000 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 269 of ? Map 7 – Contra Costa County R/ECAPs in 2010 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 270 of ? Disparities in Access to Opportunity Tables Table 1 – Indices of Access to Opportunity, Contra Costa County and Region Low Poverty School Proficiency Labor Market Transit Low Cost of Transportation Jobs Proximity Environmental Health Total Population Contra Costa County Non-Hispanic White 74.19 69.32 68.76 79.83 71.72 49.30 54.75 Black 48.69 34.34 42.52 81.81 75.62 48.12 43.68 Asian/Pacific Islander 70.60 59.43 66.87 80.81 72.22 45.27 52.22 Native American 60.28 49.99 51.19 80.47 73.09 49.04 47.92 Hispanic 48.69 39.38 42.30 82.31 75.57 45.11 43.85 Population below federal poverty line Non-Hispanic White 62.29 55.60 55.46 81.05 74.17 50.67 49.39 Black 35.56 25.84 32.63 84.03 78.23 48.69 39.84 Asian/Pacific Islander 54.25 46.48 52.15 84.04 77.75 50.02 41.52 Native American 49.83 19.92 34.52 82.61 75.06 48.41 46.48 Hispanic 34.41 30.50 32.01 84.69 78.06 44.57 38.66 Total Population San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region Non-Hispanic White 72.99 66.17 76.51 84.82 83.37 49.68 46.26 Black 46.10 37.58 46.70 88.00 85.41 48.61 31.18 Asian/Pacific Islander 67.02 58.76 67.89 88.22 86.05 45.86 38.67 Native American 58.27 50.31 57.84 86.50 84.28 48.74 37.59 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 271 of ? Hispanic 52.70 41.45 51.62 87.15 85.36 46.05 37.00 Population below federal poverty line Non-Hispanic White 62.44 57.72 68.29 87.54 86.55 53.27 37.90 Black 34.86 31.81 39.12 90.09 88.13 51.38 26.42 Asian/Pacific Islander 52.36 51.71 59.01 91.54 90.97 54.52 26.69 Native American 44.15 38.59 49.37 89.93 89.73 50.46 28.16 Hispanic 38.75 34.43 42.33 88.95 87.14 47.30 31.81 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS; Great Schools; Common Core of Data; SABINS; LAI; LEHD; NATA. Note 2: These data are derived from the HUD AFFHT, which is the HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool. Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: http://www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 2 – Indicators of Access to Opportunity, City of Antioch Low Poverty School Proficiency Labor Market Transit Low Cost of Transportation Jobs Proximity Environmental Health Total Population Antioch Non-Hispanic White 50.81 35.64 31.90 75.77 67.92 48.67 57.09 Black 52.37 39.98 33.77 75.91 67.97 52.24 58.52 Asian/Pacific Islander 60.39 49.02 38.96 73.35 64.26 50.49 64.23 Native American 46.34 32.79 29.58 77.07 69.51 48.79 53.90 Hispanic 46.06 31.57 28.83 77.24 70.39 52.25 53.43 Population below federal poverty line Non-Hispanic White 41.00 26.05 24.10 79.06 72.26 55.31 50.60 Black 43.24 29.53 28.65 79.89 72.96 51.83 53.16 Asian/Pacific Islander 60.83 35.69 42.61 78.23 65.83 41.96 59.05 Native American 63.31 27.98 26.61 70.97 60.31 56.01 62.39 Hispanic 39.92 27.50 24.23 78.41 72.64 55.28 49.28 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS; Great Schools; Common Core of Data; SABINS; LAI; LEHD; NATA. Note 2: These data are derived from the HUD AFFHT, which is the HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool . Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 3 – Indicators of Access to Opportunity, City of Concord Low Poverty School Proficiency Labor Market Transit Low Cost of Transportation Jobs Proximity Environmental Health Total Population Concord Non-Hispanic White 66.26 50.58 57.42 85.68 78.19 46.42 38.82 Black 50.41 43.84 48.33 88.19 82.88 47.04 32.97 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 272 of ? Asian/Pacific Islander 61.94 50.73 57.03 86.43 79.43 47.39 37.77 Native American 58.83 45.99 51.96 86.48 80.08 45.85 34.40 Hispanic 45.03 41.69 46.27 88.52 83.55 42.72 31.14 Population below federal poverty line Non-Hispanic White 58.83 50.28 54.34 87.72 80.62 47.05 35.89 Black 35.75 33.65 41.36 89.47 85.00 49.41 32.96 Asian/Pacific Islander 48.16 45.54 51.65 89.29 84.13 47.69 31.11 Native American 75.42 32.02 48.96 87.55 81.55 58.66 31.62 Hispanic 30.73 42.00 41.09 91.51 87.51 41.63 27.94 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS; Great Schools; Common Core of Data; SABINS; LAI; LEHD; NATA. Note 2: These data are derived from the HUD AFFHT, which is the HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool . Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 4 – Indicators of Access to Opportunity, City of Pittsburg Low Poverty School Proficiency Labor Market Transit Low Cost of Transportation Jobs Proximity Environmental Health Total Population Pittsburg Non-Hispanic White 47.51 21.80 36.60 77.45 71.41 34.95 51.49 Black 39.79 17.45 31.81 78.66 73.31 46.42 47.95 Asian/Pacific Islander 52.65 25.84 39.82 76.47 70.28 36.39 51.94 Native American 43.02 17.92 32.46 79.03 72.44 44.70 47.20 Hispanic 38.95 18.93 30.45 79.88 72.10 39.89 48.04 Population below federal poverty line Non-Hispanic White 43.69 18.60 32.72 77.60 71.96 37.41 50.20 Black 31.93 11.96 25.06 78.95 74.08 53.68 45.14 Asian/Pacific Islander 38.26 21.19 33.96 80.45 73.94 41.17 51.28 Native American 22.00 4.71 28.00 79.00 73.00 72.87 58.00 Hispanic 28.42 17.33 23.66 82.46 72.49 39.98 44.37 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS; Great Schools; Common Core of Data; SABINS; LAI; LEHD; NATA. Note 2: These data are derived from the HUD AFFHT, which is the HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool . Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 5 – Indicators of Access to Opportunity, City of Walnut Creek Low Poverty School Proficiency Labor Market Transit Low Cost of Transportation Jobs Proximity Environmental Health Total Population Walnut Creek Non-Hispanic White 83.12 88.53 89.40 85.38 77.89 53.60 51.75 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 273 of ? Black 80.34 88.04 91.70 87.16 83.28 59.80 44.63 Asian/Pacific Islander 83.10 89.10 91.03 85.23 78.26 57.80 48.83 Native American 81.00 88.58 91.26 84.84 78.20 58.72 47.23 Hispanic 80.31 88.67 91.88 86.44 82.10 60.00 45.28 Population below federal poverty line Non-Hispanic White 79.28 87.74 90.67 87.17 81.15 58.93 47.55 Black 97.00 85.63 91.00 87.00 81.00 48.94 52.00 Asian/Pacific Islander 75.77 87.54 92.60 88.39 85.98 66.22 40.19 Native American 78.00 90.99 89.00 92.00 90.00 56.03 50.00 Hispanic 65.80 84.62 94.20 90.79 89.46 64.16 42.55 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS; Great Schools; Common Core of Data; SABINS; LAI; LEHD; NATA. Note 2: These data are derived from the HUD AFFHT, which is the HUD Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Data and Mapping Tool . Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 7 – Average School Proficiency Index by Tract Hispanic Population Contra Costa County, CA Average School Proficiency Index Quintile, Hispanic Population Very Low 81.00 Low 78.28 Moderate 55.40 High 39.79 Very High 27.54 Note: Tract Hispanic population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 8 – Average School Proficiency Index by Tract Non-Hispanic White Population Table 6 – Average School Proficiency Index by Census Tract Non-Hispanic Black Population Contra Costa County, CA Average School Proficiency Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Black Population Very Low 88.05 Low 71.92 Moderate 59.50 High 37.04 Very High 24.85 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Black population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 274 of ? Contra Costa County, CA Average School Proficiency Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic White Population Very Low 23.34 Low 43.31 Moderate 57.26 High 77.40 Very High 82.08 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic White population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 9 – Average School Proficiency Index by Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Contra Costa County, CA Average School Proficiency Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Very Low 50.39 Low 59.03 Moderate 61.35 High 55.30 Very High 56.88 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 10 – Average School Proficiency Index by Tract Top-Five Places of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population Contra Costa County, CA Average School Proficiency Index Quintile, Top 5 Places of Birth, Foreign-Born Population Very Low 84.55 Low 65.86 Moderate 54.52 High 43.58 Very High 33.46 Note: Tract place of birth for foreign-born population from AFFHT0004; original source is 2013 5-year Census ACS. Table 11 – Share of Grade 4 Students Meeting or Exceeding Standard on “Smarter Balance” Achievement Test, Contra Costa County Public Schools, 2017 English Language Arts/Literacy Math District Total Economically Disadvantaged Not Economically Disadvantaged Total Economically Disadvantaged Not Economically Disadvantaged Antioch Unified 27.94 23.07 43.13 21.31 17.69 32.50 Brentwood Union Elementary 58.41 38.98 65.82 53.20 30.95 61.58 Byron Union Elementary 48.68 32.81 56.80 47.34 29.69 56.45 Canyon Elementary No Data No Data John Swett Unified 30.77 25.00 50.00 29.25 25.00 42.31 Knightsen Elementary 50.00 28.57 62.16 30.51 19.05 36.84 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 275 of ? Lafayette Elementary 82.51 No Data 83.12 81.08 No Data 81.66 Martinez Unified 49.33 34.65 56.85 49.33 26.73 60.91 Moraga Elementary 82.86 No Data 83.57 81.99 No Data 82.21 Mt. Diablo Unified 48.12 26.32 66.87 42.44 20.98 61.09 Oakley Union Elementary 34.65 18.22 48.94 32.58 22.36 41.40 Orinda Union Elementary 88.33 No Data 88.33 86.38 No Data 86.38 Pittsburg Unified 32.29 31.44 36.67 28.46 26.54 38.33 West Contra Costa Unified 31.88 21.57 59.62 26.60 17.02 52.19 San Ramon Valley Unified 77.91 46.94 79.24 78.88 47.47 80.25 Walnut Creek Elementary 73.74 34.38 77.20 71.00 27.27 74.93 Contra Costa County 50.87 26.22 69.70 47.21 21.66 66.73 State of California 45.06 31.92 66.36 40.45 27.03 62.18 Source: CA Department of Education Table 12 – Average School Proficiency Index by Census Tract Non- Hispanic Black Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average School Proficiency Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Black Population Very Low 76.85 Low 68.96 Moderate 59.36 High 44.98 Very High 31.35 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Black population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 13 – Average School Proficiency Index by Tract Hispanic Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average School Proficiency Index Quintile, Hispanic Population Very Low 74.27 Low 71.94 Moderate 60.54 High 45.42 Very High 29.62 Note: Tract Hispanic population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 14 – Average School Proficiency Index by Tract Non-Hispanic White Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average School Proficiency Index 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 276 of ? Quintile, Non-Hispanic White Population Very Low 33.09 Low 48.89 Moderate 58.18 High 66.14 Very High 75.71 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic White population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 15 – Average School Proficiency Index by Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average School Proficiency Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Very Low 55.28 Low 57.76 Moderate 52.31 High 55.36 Very High 61.22 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 16 – Average School Proficiency Index by Tract Top-Five Places of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average School Proficiency Index Quintile, Top 5 Places of Birth, Foreign-Born Population Very Low 69.67 Low 64.00 Moderate 54.98 High 48.96 Very High 44.18 Note: Tract place of birth for foreign-born population from AFFHT0004; original source is 2013 5- year Census ACS. Table 17 – Segregation (Dissimilarity) between Students at District and County Levels Contra Costa County Public Schools, 2017-18 Among schools in district Dissimilarity with White Students Between Eligible & Ineligible for Free/Reduced Meals Black Asian/PI Hispanic San Ramon Valley Unified 0.48 0.52 0.22 0.15 West Contra Costa Unified 0.43 0.32 0.57 0.46 Mt. Diablo Unified 0.48 0.20 0.50 0.51 Antioch Unified 0.26 0.27 0.18 0.21 Pittsburg Unified 0.16 0.12 0.11 0.13 Brentwood Union Elementary 0.15 0.17 0.14 0.19 Liberty Union High 0.17 0.17 0.16 0.18 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 277 of ? Acalanes Union High 0.28 0.09 0.11 0.27 Oakley Union Elementary 0.18 0.15 0.10 0.14 CCC Office of Education 0.59 0.23 0.63 0.55 Martinez Unified 0.13 0.12 0.12 0.21 Lafayette Elementary 0.16 0.05 0.08 0.20 Walnut Creek Elementary 0.20 0.10 0.06 0.18 Orinda Union Elementary 0.30 0.07 0.15 0.10 Byron Union Elementary 0.18 0.08 0.12 0.18 Moraga Elementary 0.29 0.10 0.04 0.21 John Swett Unified 0.09 0.06 0.08 0.19 Knightsen Elementary 0.31 0.26 0.10 0.18 SBE – Rocketship Furturo Academy N/A N/A N/A N/A Canyon Elementary N/A N/A N/A N/A Across all schools in County 0.66 0.45 0.56 0.57 Notes: Excludes 648 students whose school name is listed as “Non -Public, Non-Sectarian Schools” or “School Office.” All groups except Hispanics include only non-Hispanic members of the racial group. Asian Group includes Pacific Islanders. Source: CA Department of Education Table 18 - Change in Enrollment for Contra Costa County and Districts: 1997/98 to 2017/18 Total and Major Racial/Ethnic Groups Total White Asian/Pacific Islander Black Hispanic Absolute % Absolute % Absolute % Absolute % Absolute % Contra Costa County 26,878 17.9 -30,334 -35.9 12,851 70.0 -3,614 -18.6 35,938 132.5 Acalanes Union High 785 16.1 -160 -4.2 155 21.8 37 63.8 263 107.3 Antioch Unified -113 -0.7 -7,765 -76.0 412 28.8 2,511 137.8 3,900 107.3 Brentwood Union Elem. 5,904 187.7 1,778 91.6 959 1155.4 600 1538.5 1,674 160.2 Byron Union Elementary 1,289 124.4 526 63.3 110 366.7 76 475.0 381 261.0 Canyon Elementary -5 -6.5 -16 -25.8 3 300.0 -10 -83.3 7 NA CCC Office of Education 4,051 367.3 998 192.7 356 434.1 182 62.5 1,806 894.1 John Swett Unified -669 -30.3 -775 -75.8 -25 -6.7 -100 -22.9 160 43.2 Knightsen Elementary 268 81.5 23 8.8 14 200.0 2 200.0 170 288.1 Lafayette Elementary 121 3.5 -567 -18.7 52 16.0 4 15.4 207 240.7 Liberty Union High 5,138 166.8 1,319 62.3 738 838.6 671 849.4 2,016 263.5 Martinez Unified -159 -3.7 -1,305 -39.8 91 47.9 -38 -26.6 659 108.7 Moraga Elementary -58 -3.1 -485 -30.7 71 29.1 4 33.3 108 216.0 Mt. Diablo Unified -4,524 -12.6 -14,120 -59.4 -96 -2.3 -533 -30.3 7,286 121.2 Oakley Union Elementary 1,000 23.8 -1,069 -38.8 199 125.2 297 165.0 1,246 118.4 Orinda Union Elementary 135 5.6 -413 -19.8 218 85.2 24 200.0 81 172.3 Pittsburg Unified 2,187 23.4 -1,528 -71.8 -214 -16.4 -629 -24.2 4,047 123.3 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 278 of ? San Ramon Valley Unified 12,978 66.5 -2,623 -16.5 10,352 441.8 223 69.9 2,011 240.8 Walnut Creek Elementary 369 11.4 -588 -22.3 342 118.8 33 62.3 261 113.0 West Contra Costa Unified -1,461 -4.4 -3,344 -50.6 -1,418 -22.5 -6,395 -55.0 8,537 101.0 Notes: All groups except “Hispanics include only non-Hispanic members of the racial group. Asian group includes Pacific Islanders and Filipinos. Before 2016-17 data excludes Adult Education. Excludes data for SBE-Rocketship academy, for which no data is available before 2012-13. Source: 1997/98 from U.S. Department of Education, National Center of Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), “Local Education Agency (School District) Universe Survey Membership Data”; 2017/18 from CA Department of Education. Table 19 – Average Labor Market Engagement Index by Census Tract Non- Hispanic Black Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Labor Market Engagement Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Black Population Very Low 84.17 Low 73.14 Moderate 58.44 High 51.57 Very High 32.88 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Black population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 20 – Average Labor Market Engagement Index by Census Tract Hispanic Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Labor Market Engagement Index Quintile, Hispanic Population Very Low 85.61 Low 78.98 Moderate 63.32 High 43.62 Very High 28.73 Note: Tract Hispanic population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 21 – Average Labor Market Engagement Index by Tract Non-Hispanic White Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Labor Market Engagement Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic White Population Very Low 35.95 Low 53.48 Moderate 59.90 High 72.24 Very High 78.61 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic White population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 279 of ? Table 22 – Average Labor Market Engagement Index by Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Labor Market Engagement Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Very Low 45.34 Low 59.14 Moderate 64.13 High 61.12 Very High 70.83 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 23 – Average Labor Market Engagement Index by Tract Top-Five Places of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Labor Market Engagement Index Quintile, Top 5 Places of Birth, Foreign-Born Population Very Low 80.64 Low 69.76 Moderate 60.05 High 50.40 Very High 39.19 Note: Tract place of birth for foreign-born population from AFFHT0004; original source is 2013 5-year Census ACS. Table 24 – Average Job Availability Index by Census Tract Non-Hispanic Black Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Job Availability Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Black Population Very Low 800.7 Low 726.7 Moderate 663.0 High 379.0 Very High 358.0 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Black population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 25 – Average Job Availability Index by Tract Hispanic Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Job Availability Index Quintile, Hispanic Population Very Low 743.4 Low 754.4 Moderate 562.3 High 469.9 Very High 403.1 Note: Tract Hispanic population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 280 of ? Table 26 – Average Job Availability Index by Tract Non-Hispanic White Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Job Availability Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic White Population Very Low 426.2 Low 510.6 Moderate 574.2 High 740.8 Very High 688.7 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic White population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 27 – Average Job Availability by Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Job Availability Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Very Low 570.3 Low 652.7 Moderate 598.5 High 582.6 Very High 531.8 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 28 – Average Job Availability Index by Tract Top-Five Places of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Job Availability Index Quintile, Top 5 Places of Birth, Foreign-Born Population Very Low 745.6 Low 632.8 Moderate 621.5 High 477.0 Very High 454.7 Note: Tract place of birth for foreign-born population from AFFHT0004; original source is 2013 5-year Census ACS. Table 29 – Average Labor Market Engagement Index by Census Tract Non- Hispanic Black Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average Labor Market Engagement Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Black Population Very Low 86.06 Low 81.05 Moderate 71.05 High 58.98 Very High 39.96 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 281 of ? Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Black population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 30 – Average Labor Market Engagement Index by Tract Hispanic Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average Labor Market Engagement Index Quintile, Hispanic Population Very Low 86.07 Low 82.11 Moderate 71.34 High 57.98 Very High 39.74 Note: Tract Hispanic population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 31 – Average Labor Market Engagement Index by Tract Non-Hispanic White Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average Labor Market Engagement Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic White Population Very Low 38.77 Low 62.96 Moderate 71.31 High 79.17 Very High 83.52 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic White population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 32 – Average Labor Market Engagement Index by Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average Labor Market Engagement Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Very Low 65.87 Low 72.53 Moderate 64.23 High 65.12 Very High 68.73 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 33 – Average Labor Market Engagement Index by Tract Top-Five Places of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average Labor Market Engagement Index Quintile, Top 5 Places of Birth, Foreign-Born Population Very Low 84.18 Low 77.34 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 282 of ? Moderate 67.16 High 56.80 Very High 51.63 Note: Tract place of birth for foreign-born population from AFFHT0004; original source is 2013 5-year Census ACS. Table 34 – Average Percentage of Workers 16+ with Commute Times of 45 minutes and above, by Census Tract Non-Hispanic Black Population Contra Costa County, CA Average % of workers with commutes >= 45 minutes Quintile, Non-Hispanic Black Population Very Low 28.5 Low 33.0 Moderate 31.4 High 37.4 Very High 37.7 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Black population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 35 – Average Percentage of Workers 16+ with Commute Times of 45 minutes and above, by Tract Hispanic Population Contra Costa County, CA Average % of workers with commutes >= 45 minutes Quintile, Hispanic Population Very Low 28.5 Low 32.5 Moderate 34.1 High 37.9 Very High 35.0 Note: Tract Hispanic population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 36 – Average Percentage of Workers 16+ with Commute Times of 45 minutes and above, by Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Contra Costa County, CA Average % of workers with commutes >= 45 minutes Quintile, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Very Low 32.1 Low 31.1 Moderate 35.3 High 32.8 Very High 36.9 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 37 – Average Percentage of Workers 16+ with Commute Times of 45 minutes and above, by Tract Top-Five Places of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population Contra Costa County, CA Average % of workers with commutes >= 45 minutes Quintile, Top 5 Places of Birth, Foreign-Born Population 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 283 of ? Very Low 29.4 Low 32.5 Moderate 34.5 High 35.6 Very High 36.1 Note: Tract place of birth for foreign-born population from AFFHT0004; original source is 2013 5-year Census ACS. Table 38 – Average Low Poverty Index by Census Tract Non-Hispanic Black Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Low Poverty Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Black Population Very Low 85.41 Low 79.48 Moderate 62.29 High 57.98 Very High 39.46 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Black population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 39 – Average Low Poverty Index by Tract Hispanic Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Low Poverty Index Quintile, Hispanic Population Very Low 83.78 Low 79.76 Moderate 68.51 High 58.76 Very High 33.78 Note: Tract Hispanic population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 40 – Average Low Poverty Index by Tract Non-Hispanic White Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Low Poverty Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic White Population Very Low 38.68 Low 54.30 Moderate 71.63 High 76.83 Very High 83.32 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic White population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 41 – Average Low Poverty Index by Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Low Poverty Index 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 284 of ? Quintile, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Very Low 57.10 Low 63.41 Moderate 68.77 High 59.98 Very High 75.98 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 42 – Average Low Poverty Index by Tract Top-Five Places of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population Contra Costa County, CA Average Low Poverty Index Quintile, Top 5 Places of Birth, Foreign-Born Population Very Low 85.90 Low 66.95 Moderate 71.76 High 56.93 Very High 42.95 Note: Tract place of birth for foreign-born population from AFFHT0004; original source is 2013 5-year Census ACS. Table 43 – Average Percent Households Receiving SNAP by Tract Non-Hispanic Black Population Contra Costa County, CA Average % Households Receiving SNAP Quintile, Non-Hispanic Black Population Very Low 0.97% Low 3.00% Moderate 5.72% High 8.97% Very High 14.89% Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Black population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 44 – Average Percent Households Receiving SNAP by Tract Hispanic Population Contra Costa County, CA Average % Households Receiving SNAP Quintile, Hispanic Population Very Low 1.47% Low 1.88% Moderate 5.56% High 9.78% Very High 14.87% Note: Tract Hispanic population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 285 of ? Table 45 – Average Percent Households Receiving SNAP by Tract Non- Hispanic White Population Contra Costa County, CA Average % Households Receiving SNAP Quintile, Non-Hispanic White Population Very Low 14.20% Low 8.00% Moderate 5.71% High 3.03% Very High 2.61% Note: Tract Non-Hispanic White population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 46 – Average Percent Households Receiving SNAP by Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Contra Costa County, CA Average % Households Receiving SNAP Quintile, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Very Low 9.44% Low 5.89% Moderate 5.68% High 7.95% Very High 4.51% Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 47 – Average Percent Households Receiving SNAP by Tract Top-Five Places of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population Contra Costa County, CA Average % Households Receiving SNAP Quintile, Top 5 Places of Birth, Foreign-Born Population Very Low 1.70% Low 4.42% Moderate 5.56% High 9.01% Very High 12.89% Note: Tract place of birth for foreign-born population from AFFHT0004; original source is 2013 5-year Census ACS. Table 48 – Average Low Poverty Index by Census Tract Non-Hispanic Black Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average Low Poverty Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Black Population Very Low 80.76 Low 74.63 Moderate 69.34 High 58.08 Very High 38.86 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Black population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 286 of ? Table 49 – Average Low Poverty Index by Tract Hispanic Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average Low Poverty Index Quintile, Hispanic Population Very Low 75.43 Low 72.48 Moderate 66.46 High 63.49 Very High 43.88 Note: Tract Hispanic population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 50 – Average Low Poverty Index by Tract Non-Hispanic White Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average Low Poverty Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic White Population Very Low 38.93 Low 61.34 Moderate 66.65 High 72.58 Very High 81.13 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic White population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 51 – Average Low Poverty Index by Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average Low Poverty Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Very Low 61.07 Low 67.10 Moderate 60.06 High 62.95 Very High 69.98 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 52 – Average Low Poverty Index by Tract Top-Five Places of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average Low Poverty Index Quintile, Top 5 Places of Birth, Foreign-Born Population Very Low 76.04 Low 69.15 Moderate 64.53 High 58.25 Very High 53.78 Note: Tract place of birth for foreign-born population from AFFHT0004; original source is 2013 5-year Census ACS. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 287 of ? Table 53 – CalEnviroScreen, by Race Contra Costa County CalEnviroScreen White, Non-Hispanic 25.72 Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic 30.90 Native American, Non-Hispanic 39.37 Hispanic 53.63 Black, Non-Hispanic 55.23 Table 54 – Average CalEnviroScreen Index by Census Tract Non-Hispanic Black Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average CalEnviroScreen Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Black Population Very Low 8.00 Low 16.34 Moderate 39.31 High 47.10 Very High 66.17 Notes: Tract Non-Hispanic Black population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 55 – Average CalEnviroScreen Index by Tract Hispanic Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average CalEnviroScreen Index Quintile, Hispanic Population Very Low 10.69 Low 14.38 Moderate 33.74 High 48.89 Very High 69.09 Note: Tract Hispanic population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 56 – Average CalEnviroScreen Index by Tract Non-Hispanic White Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average CalEnviroScreen Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic White Population Very Low 63.66 Low 43.28 Moderate 30.64 High 21.44 Very High 16.55 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic White population from AFFHT0004 raw data; original source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census. Table 57 – Average CalEnviroScreen Index by Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 288 of ? (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average CalEnviroScreen Index Quintile, Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander Population Very Low 42.04 Low 32.98 Moderate 31.49 High 38.69 Very High 30.59 Note: Tract Non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander population; source is 2010 U.S. Decennial Census, table P2. Table 58 – Average CalEnviroScreen Index by Tract Top-Five Places of Birth for the Foreign-Born Population (San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA) Region Average CalEnviroScreen Index Quintile, Top 5 Places of Birth, Foreign-Born Population Very Low 11.01 Low 25.79 Moderate 31.96 High 46.96 Very High 61.11 Note: Tract place of birth for foreign-born population from AFFHT0004; original source is 2013 5-year Census ACS. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 289 of ? Maps Map 1: School Proficiency Index, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 290 of ? Map 2: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (all races shown), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 291 of ? Map 3: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White only), Contra Costa County Map 4: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Black only), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 292 of ? Map 5: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander only), Contra Costa County Map 6: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (Hispanic only), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 293 of ? Map 7: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (all races shown), Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 294 of ? Map 8: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (all races shown), Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 295 of ? Map 9: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (all races shown), Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 296 of ? Map 10: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (all races shown), Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 297 of ? Map 11: School Proficiency Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 298 of ? Map 12: School Proficiency Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Antioch Map 13: School Proficiency Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 299 of ? Map 14: School Proficiency Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Pittsburg Map 15: School Proficiency Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 300 of ? Map 16: School Proficiency Index by Family Status, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 301 of ? Map 17: School Proficiency Index by Family Status, Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 302 of ? Map 18: School Proficiency Index by Family Status, Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 303 of ? Map 19: School Proficiency Index by Family Status, Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 304 of ? Map 20: School Proficiency Index by Family Status, Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 305 of ? Map 21: Contra Costa County School Districts 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 306 of ? Map 22: Student Poverty, Contra Costa County Public Schools 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 307 of ? Map 23: School Proficiency Index, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 308 of ? Map 24: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (all races shown), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 309 of ? Map 25: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White only), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 310 of ? Map 26: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Black only), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 311 of ? Map 27: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander only), San Francisco- Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 312 of ? Map 28: School Proficiency Index by Race/Ethnicity (Hispanic only), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 313 of ? Map 29: School Proficiency Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 314 of ? Map 30: School Proficiency Index by Family Status, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 315 of ? Map 31: Contra Costa County School Districts in relation to entitlement jurisdiction boundaries: Note: City boundaries for Richmond, Concord, Walnut Creek, Pittsburg, and Antioch outlined in green. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 316 of ? Map 32: Labor Market Engagement Index, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 317 of ? Map 33: Jobs Proximity Index, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 318 of ? Map 34: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (all races shown), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 319 of ? Map 35: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White only), Contra Costa County Map 36: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Black only), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 320 of ? Map 37: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander only), Contra Costa County Map 38: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (Hispanic only), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 321 of ? Map 39: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (all races shown), Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 322 of ? Map 40: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (all races shown), Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 323 of ? Map 41: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (all races shown), Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 324 of ? Map 42: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (all races shown), Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 325 of ? Map 43: Labor Market Engagement Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 326 of ? Map 44: Labor Market Engagement Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 327 of ? Map 45: Labor Market Engagement Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Concord Map 46: Labor Market Engagement Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 328 of ? Map 47: Labor Market Engagement Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 329 of ? Map 48: Labor Market Engagement Index by Family Status, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 330 of ? Map 49: Labor Market Engagement Index by Family Status, Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 331 of ? Map 50: Labor Market Engagement Index by Family Status, Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 332 of ? Map 51: Labor Market Engagement Index by Family Status, Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 333 of ? Map 52: Labor Market Engagement Index by Family Status, Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 334 of ? Map 53: Job Availability Index, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 335 of ? Map 54: Labor Market Engagement Index, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 336 of ? Map 55: Jobs Proximity Index, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 337 of ? Map 56: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (all races shown), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 338 of ? Map 57: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White only), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 339 of ? Map 58: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Black only), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 340 of ? Map 59: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Asian and Pacific Islander only), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 341 of ? Map 60: Labor Market Engagement Index by Race/Ethnicity (Hispanic only), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 342 of ? Map 61: Labor Market Engagement Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 343 of ? Map 62: Labor Market Engagement Index by Family Status, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 344 of ? Map 63: Low Transportation Cost Index, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 345 of ? Map 64: Transit Trips Index, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 346 of ? Map 65: Low Transportation Cost Index, Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 347 of ? Map 66: Transit Trips Index, Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 348 of ? Map 67: Low Transportation Cost Index, Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 349 of ? Map 68: Transit Trips Index, Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 350 of ? Map 69: Low Transportation Cost Index, Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 351 of ? Map 70: Transit Trips Index, Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 352 of ? Map 71: Low Transportation Cost Index, Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 353 of ? Map 72: Transit Trips Index, Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 354 of ? Map 73: Low Transportation Cost Index, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 355 of ? Map 74: Transit Trips Index, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 356 of ? Map 75: Percentage of Workers 16 Years and Above with Travel Times to Work of 45 minutes and above, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 357 of ? Map 76: Low Poverty Index, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 358 of ? Map 77: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (All races shown), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 359 of ? Map 78: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White only), Contra Costa County Map 79: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Black only), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 360 of ? Map 80: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (Hispanic only), Contra Costa County Map 81: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Asian only), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 361 of ? Map 82: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (All races shown), Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 362 of ? Map 83: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (All races shown), Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 363 of ? Map 84: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (All races shown), Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 364 of ? Map 85: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (All races shown), Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 365 of ? Map 86 – Low Poverty Index by National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top 5 most populous) 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 366 of ? Map 87 – Low Poverty Index by National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top 5 most populous), Antioch Map 88 – Low Poverty Index by National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top 5 most populous), Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 367 of ? Map 89 – Low Poverty Index by National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top 5 most populous), Pittsburg Map 90 – Low Poverty Index by National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top 5 most populous), Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 368 of ? Map 91 – Low Poverty Index by Family Status, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 369 of ? Map 92 – Low Poverty Index by Family Status, Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 370 of ? Map 93 – Low Poverty Index by Family Status, Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 371 of ? Map 94 – Low Poverty Index by Family Status, Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 372 of ? Map 95 – Low Poverty Index by Family Status, Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 373 of ? Map 96 – Percent Households Receiving Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 374 of ? Map 97: Low Poverty Index, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region Map 98: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (All races shown), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 375 of ? Map 99: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White only), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region Map 100: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Black only), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 376 of ? Map 101: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (Hispanic only), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region Map 102: Low Poverty Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Asian only), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 377 of ? Map 103 – Low Poverty Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 378 of ? Map 104 – Low Poverty Index by Family Status, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 379 of ? Map 105: Environmental Health Index, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 380 of ? Map 106: Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (All Races Shown), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 381 of ? Map 107: Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White only), Contra Costa County Map 108: Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Black only), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 382 of ? Map 109: Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (Hispanic Black), Contra Costa County Map 110: Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Asian only), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 383 of ? Map 111: Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (All Races Shown), Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 384 of ? Map 112: Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (All Races Shown), Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 385 of ? Map 113: Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (All Races Shown), Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 386 of ? Map 114: Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (All Races Shown), Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 387 of ? Map 115 – Environmental Health Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 388 of ? Map 116 – Environmental Health Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Antioch Map 117 – Environmental Health Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 389 of ? Map 118– Environmental Health Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Pittsburg Map 119– Environmental Health Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 390 of ? Map 120 – Environmental Health Index by Family Status, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 391 of ? Map 121 – Environmental Health Index by Family Status, Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 392 of ? Map 122 – Environmental Health Index by Family Status, Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 393 of ? Map 123 – Environmental Health Index by Family Status, Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 394 of ? Map 124 – Environmental Health Index by Family Status, Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 395 of ? Map 125 – CalEnviroScreen Index, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 396 of ? Map 126 – CalEnviroScreen, Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 397 of ? Map 127 – CalEnviroScreen, Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 398 of ? Map 128 – CalEnviroScreen, Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 399 of ? Map 129 – CalEnviroScreen, Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 400 of ? Map 130 – Environmental Health Index, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 401 of ? Map 131 – Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (All Races Shown), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 402 of ? Map 132 – Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White only), San Francisco-Oakland- Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 403 of ? Map 133 – Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Blacks only), San Francisco-Oakland- Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 404 of ? Map 134 – Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (Hispanics only), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 405 of ? Map 135 – Environmental Health Index by Race/Ethnicity (Non-Hispanic Asians only), San Francisco-Oakland- Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 406 of ? Map 136 – Environmental Health Index by National Origin (Top 5 most populous), San Francisco-Oakland- Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 407 of ? 137: Environmental Health Index by Family Status, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 408 of ? Figures Figure 1 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 Public School Enrollment for Major Racial/Ethnic Groups, Contra Costa County, 1997-2017 White Hispanic Asian/Pac.Islander African American Notes: All groups except "Hispanics" include only non-Hispanic members of the racial group. Asian group includes Pacific Islanders and Filipinos. Source: 1997/98 to 2015/16 data from U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), "Local Education Agency (School District) Universe Survey Membership Data"; 2016/17 to 2017/18 from CA Department of Education. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 409 of ? Figure 2 - 2015 Transit Asset Condition by Operator 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 410 of ? Disproportionate Housing Needs Tables Table 1 – Demographics of Households with Housing Problems, Contra Costa County and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward CA Region Households experiencing any of 4 housing problems Contra Costa County Region Race/Ethnicity # with problems # households % with problems # with problems # households % with problems Not Hispanic White 80,864 213,302 37.91% 316,225 841,640 37.57% Black 19,316 34,275 56.36% 79,090 141,095 56.05% Asian/Pacific Island 21,640 51,353 42.14% 155,414 347,022 44.79% Native American 482 1,211 39.80% 2,302 4,841 47.55% Other 5,090 10,355 49.15% 20,950 43,760 47.87% Hispanic 37,541 65,201 57.58% 148,135 248,785 59.54% Total 164,994 375,853 43.90% 722,110 1,627,125 44.38% Household Type & Size Family households, less than 5 people 85,176 221,191 38.51% 331,070 856,140 38.67% Family households, 5 or more people 26,035 44,095 59.04% 99,495 159,025 62.57% Non-family households 53,733 110,507 48.62% 291,550 611,960 47.64% Households experiencing any of 4 SEVERE Housing Problems Race/Ethnicity # with severe problems # households % with severe problems # with severe problems # households % with severe problems Not Hispanic White 38,039 213,302 17.83% 156,775 841,640 18.63% Black 10,465 34,275 30.53% 46,125 141,095 32.69% Asian/Pacific Island 10,447 51,353 20.34% 87,749 347,022 25.29% Native American 203 1,211 16.76% 1,448 4,841 29.91% Other 2,782 10,355 26.87% 12,134 43,760 27.73% Hispanic 23,002 65,201 35.28% 94,990 248,785 38.18% Total 85,009 375,853 22.62% 399,195 1,627,125 24.53% Note 1: The four housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 30%. The four severe housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 50%. Note 2: All % represent a share of the total popula tion within the jurisdiction or region, except household type and size, which is out of total households. Note 3: Data Sources: CHAS. Note 4: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 411 of ? Table 2 – Demographics of Households with Severe Housing Cost Burd en, Contra Costa County and the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward CA Region Contra Costa County Region Race/Ethnicity # with severe cost burden # House- holds % with severe cost burden # with severe cost burden # house- holds % with severe cost burden Not Hispanic White 34,549 213,302 16.20% 139,610 841,640 16.59% Black 9,573 34,275 27.93% 40,345 141,095 28.59% Asian/Pacific Island 8,016 51,353 15.61% 60,280 347,022 17.37% Native American 161 1,211 13.29% 1,170 4,841 24.17% Other 2,402 10,355 23.20% 10,110 43,760 23.10% Hispanic 15,532 65,201 23.82% 60,480 248,785 24.31% Total: 70,233 375,853 18.69% 311,995 1,627,125 19.17% Household Type & Size Family households, under 5 people 35,021 221,191 15.83% 137,613 856,140 16.07% Family households, 5 or more people 7,880 44,095 17.87% 26,310 159,025 16.54% Non-family households 27,324 110,507 24.73% 148,025 611,960 24.19% Note 1: Severe housing cost burden is defined as greater than 50% of income. Note 2: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except household type and size, which is out of total households. Note 3: The # households is the denominator for the % with problems, and may differ from the # households for the table on severe housing problems. Note 4: Data Sources: CHAS. Note 5: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation). 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 412 of ? Table 3 – Demographics of Households with Housing Problems, City of Antioch and Contra Costa County Households experiencing any of 4 housing problems Antioch Contra Costa County Race/Ethnicity # with problems # households % with problems # with problems # households % with problems Not Hispanic White 5,444 13,619 39.97% 80,864 213,302 37.91% Black 3,620 5,730 63.18% 19,316 34,275 56.36% Asian/Pacific Island 1,555 3,269 47.57% 21,640 51,353 42.14% Native American 104 178 58.43% 482 1,211 39.80% Other 604 1,019 59.27% 5,090 10,355 49.15% Hispanic 5,135 8,394 61.17% 37,541 65,201 57.58% Total 16,455 32,215 51.08% 164,994 375,853 43.90 % Household Type & Size Family households, less than 5 people 8,615 18,970 45.41% 85,176 221,191 38.51% Family households, 5 or more people 3,525 5,600 62.95% 26,035 44,095 59.04% Non-family households 4,320 7,645 56.51% 53,733 110,507 48.62% Households experiencing any of 4 SEVERE Housing Problems Race/Ethnicity # w/severe problems # households % w/severe problems # w/severe problems # households % w/severe problems Not Hispanic White 2,619 13,619 19.23% 38,039 213,302 17.83% Black 1,889 5,730 32.97% 10,465 34,275 30.53% Asian/Pacific Island 833 3,269 25.48% 10,447 51,353 20.34% Native American 25 178 14.04% 203 1,211 16.76% Other 339 1,019 33.27% 2,782 10,355 26.87% Hispanic 2,920 8,394 34.79% 23,002 65,201 35.28% Total 8,635 32,215 26.80% 85,009 375,853 22.62% Note 1: The four housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 30%. The four severe housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 50%. Note 2: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except household type and size, which is out of total households. Note 3: Data Sources: CHAS. Note 4: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data- documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 413 of ? Table 4 – Demographics of Households with Severe Housing Cost Burden, Antioch and Contra Costa County Antioch Contra Costa County Race/Ethnicity # with severe cost burden # House- holds % with severe cost burden # with severe cost burden # house- holds % with severe cost burden Not Hispanic White 2,115 13,619 15.53% 34,549 213,302 16.20% Black 1,740 5,730 30.37% 9,573 34,275 27.93% Asian/Pacific Island 710 3,269 21.72% 8,016 51,353 15.61% Native American 0 178 0.00% 161 1,211 13.29% Other 310 1,019 30.42% 2,402 10,355 23.20% Hispanic 2,265 8,394 26.98% 15,532 65,201 23.82% Total: 7,140 32,215 22.16% 70,233 375,853 18.69 % Household Type & Size Family households, under 5 people 3,785 18,970 19.95% 35,021 221,191 15.83% Family households, 5 or more people 1,180 5,600 21.07% 7,880 44,095 17.87% Non-family households 2,145 7,645 28.06% 27,324 110,507 24.73% Note 1: Severe housing cost burden is defined as greater than 50% of income. Note 2: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except household type and size, which is out of total households. Note 3: The # households is the denominator for the % with problems, and may differ from the # households for the table on severe housing problems. Note 4: Data Sources: CHAS. Note 5: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation). 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 414 of ? Table 5 – Demographics of Households with Housing Problems, City of Concord and Contra Costa County Households experiencing any of 4 housing problems Concord Contra Costa County Race/Ethnicity # with problems # households % with problems # with problems # households % with problems Not Hispanic White 10,655 26,975 39.50% 80,864 213,302 37.91% Black 945 1,705 55.43% 19,316 34,275 56.36% Asian/Pacific Island 2,254 5,158 43.70% 21,640 51,353 42.14% Native American 43 146 29.45% 482 1,211 39.80% Other 570 1,309 43.54% 5,090 10,355 49.15% Hispanic 5,905 9,555 61.80% 37,541 65,201 57.58% Total 20,385 44,880 45.42% 164,994 375,853 43.90 % Household Type & Size Family households, less than 5 people 10,495 26,419 39.73% 85,176 221,191 38.51% Family households, 5 or more people 3,065 4,615 66.41% 26,035 44,095 59.04% Non-family households 6,824 13,843 49.30% 53,733 110,507 48.62% Households experiencing any of 4 SEVERE Housing Problems Race/Ethnicity # w/severe problems # households % w/severe problems # w/severe problems # households % w/severe problems Not Hispanic White 5,155 26,975 19.11% 38,039 213,302 17.83% Black 500 1,705 29.33% 10,465 34,275 30.53% Asian/Pacific Island 1,184 5,158 22.95% 10,447 51,353 20.34% Native American 8 146 5.48% 203 1,211 16.76% Other 375 1,309 28.65% 2,782 10,355 26.87% Hispanic 3,755 9,555 39.30% 23,002 65,201 35.28% Total: 10,975 44,880 24.45% 85,009 375,853 22.62 % Note 1: The four housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 30%. The four severe housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 50%. Note 2: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except household type and size, which is out of total households. Note 3: Data Sources: CHAS. Note 4: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data- documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 415 of ? Table 6 - Demographics of Households with Severe Housing Cost Burden, City of Concord and Contra Costa County Race/Ethnicity Concord Contra Costa County # with severe cost burden # house- holds % with severe cost burden # with severe cost burden # house- holds % with severe cost burden Non-Hispanic White 4,735 26,975 17.55% 34,549 213,302 16.20% Black 425 1,705 24.93% 9,573 34,275 27.93% Asian/Pacific Islander 785 5,158 15.22% 8,016 51,353 15.61% Native American 8 146 5.48% 161 1,211 13.29% Other 300 1,309 22.92% 2,402 10,355 23.20% Hispanic 2,470 9,555 25.85% 15,532 65,201 23.82% Total: 8,723 44,880 19.44% 70,233 375,853 18.69 % Household Type and Size Family households, under 5 people 4,690 26,419 17.75% 35,021 221,191 15.83% Family households, 5 or more people 734 4,615 15.90% 7,880 44,095 17.87% Non-family households 3,299 13,843 23.83% 27,324 110,507 24.73% Note 1: Severe housing cost burden is defined as greater than 50% of income. Note 2: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except household type and size, which is out of total households. Note 3: The # households is the denominator for the % with problems, and may differ from the # households for the table on severe housing problems. Note 4: Data Sources: CHAS. Note 5: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 416 of ? Table 7 – Demographics of Households with Housing Problems, City of Pittsburg and Contra Costa County Households experiencing any of 4 housing problems Pittsburg Contra Costa County Race/Ethnicity # with problems # households % with problems # with problems # households % with problems Not Hispanic White 2,315 5,555 41.67% 80,864 213,302 37.91% Black 2,189 3,999 54.74% 19,316 34,275 56.36% Asian/Pacific Island 1,259 2,854 44.11% 21,640 51,353 42.14% Native American 74 74 100.00% 482 1,211 39.80% Other 389 628 61.94% 5,090 10,355 49.15% Hispanic 3,960 6,513 60.80% 37,541 65,201 57.58% Total: 10,170 19,610 51.86% 164,994 375,853 43.90 % Household Type & Size Family households, less than 5 people 4,845 10,465 46.30% 85,176 221,191 38.51% Family households, 5 or more people 2,655 4,189 63.38% 26,035 44,095 59.04% Non-family households 2,665 4,950 53.84% 53,733 110,507 48.62% Households experiencing any of 4 SEVERE Housing Problems Race/Ethnicity # w/severe problems # households % w/severe problems # w/severe problems # households % w/severe problems Not Hispanic White 1,134 5,555 20.41% 38,039 213,302 17.83% Black 1,059 3,999 26.48% 10,465 34,275 30.53% Asian/Pacific Island 649 2,854 22.74% 10,447 51,353 20.34% Native American 14 74 18.92% 203 1,211 16.76% Other 245 628 39.01% 2,782 10,355 26.87% Hispanic 2,555 6,513 39.23% 23,002 65,201 35.28% Total: 5,655 19,610 28.84% 85,009 375,853 22.62 % Note 1: The four housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 30%. The four severe housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 50%. Note 2: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except household type and size, which is out of total households. Note 3: Data Sources: CHAS. Note 4: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data- documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 417 of ? Table 8 - Demographics of Households with Severe Housing Cost Burden, City of Pittsburg and Contra Costa County Race/Ethnicity Pittsburg Contra Costa County # with severe cost burden # house- holds % with severe cost burden # with severe cost burden # house- holds % with severe cost burden Non-Hispanic White 1,035 5,555 18.63% 34,549 213,302 16.20% Black 969 3,999 24.23% 9,573 34,275 27.93% Asian/Pacific Islander 430 2,854 15.07% 8,016 51,353 15.61% Native American 15 74 20.27% 161 1,211 13.29% Other 190 628 30.25% 2,402 10,355 23.20% Hispanic 1,675 6,513 25.72% 15,532 65,201 23.82% Total: 4,314 19,610 22.00% 70,233 375,853 18.69 % Household Type and Size Family households, under 5 people 2,180 10,465 20.83% 35,021 221,191 15.83% Family households, 5 or more people 883 4,189 21.08% 7,880 44,095 17.87% Non-family households 1,268 4,950 25.62% 27,324 110,507 24.73% Note 1: Severe housing cost burden is defined as greater than 50% of income. Note 2: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except household type and size, which is out of total households. Note 3: The # households is the denominator for the % with problems, and may differ from the # households for the table on severe housing problems. Note 4: Data Sources: CHAS. Note 5: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 418 of ? Table 9 – Demographics of Households with Disproportionate Housing Needs, City of Walnut Creek and Contra Costa County Households experiencing any of 4 housing problems Walnut Creek Contra Costa County Race/Ethnicity # with problems # households % with problems # with problems # households % with problems Not Hispanic White 9,055 23,415 38.67% 80,864 213,302 37.91% Black 195 395 49.37% 19,316 34,275 56.36% Asian/Pacific Island 1,035 3,423 30.24% 21,640 51,353 42.14% Native American 25 84 29.76% 482 1,211 39.80% Other 195 440 44.32% 5,090 10,355 49.15% Hispanic 1,115 2,105 52.97% 37,541 65,201 57.58% Total: 11,615 29,850 38.91% 164,994 375,853 43.90 % Household Type & Size Family households, less than 5 people 4,885 15,210 32.12% 85,176 221,191 38.51% Family households, 5 or more people 470 1,270 37.01% 26,035 44,095 59.04% Non-family households 6,255 13,370 46.78% 53,733 110,507 48.62% Households experiencing any of 4 SEVERE Housing Problems Race/Ethnicity # w/severe problems # households % w/severe problems # w/severe problems # households % w/severe problems Not Hispanic White 4,605 23,415 19.67% 38,039 213,302 17.83% Black 140 395 35.44% 10,465 34,275 30.53% Asian/Pacific Island 545 3,423 15.92% 10,447 51,353 20.34% Native American 25 84 29.76% 203 1,211 16.76% Other 110 440 25.00% 2,782 10,355 26.87% Hispanic 490 2,105 23.28% 23,002 65,201 35.28% Total: 5,920 29,850 19.83% 85,009 375,853 22.62 % Note 1: The four housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 30%. The four severe housing problems are: incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, more than 1 person per room, and cost burden greater than 50%. Note 2: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except household type and size, which is out of total households. Note 3: Data Sources: CHAS. Note 4: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data- documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 419 of ? Table 10 - Demographics of Households with Severe Housing Cost Burden, City of Walnut Creek and Contra Costa County Race/Ethnicity Walnut Creek Contra Costa County # with severe cost burden # house- holds % with severe cost burden # with severe cost burden # house- holds % with severe cost burden Non-Hispanic White 4,135 23,415 17.66% 34,549 213,302 16.20% Black 140 395 35.44% 9,573 34,275 27.93% Asian/Pacific Islander 435 3,423 12.71% 8,016 51,353 15.61% Native American 25 84 29.76% 161 1,211 13.29% Other 100 440 22.73% 2,402 10,355 23.20% Hispanic 380 2,105 18.05% 15,532 65,201 23.82% Total: 5,215 29,850 17.47% 70,233 375,853 18.69 % Household Type and Size Family households, under 5 people 1,805 15,210 11.87% 35,021 221,191 15.83% Family households, 5 or more people 199 1,270 15.67% 7,880 44,095 17.87% Non-family households 3,220 13,370 24.08% 27,324 110,507 24.73% Note 1: Severe housing cost burden is defined as greater than 50% of income. Note 2: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except household type and size, which is out of total households. Note 3: The # households is the denominator for the % with problems, and may differ from the # households for the table on severe housing problems. Note 4: Data Sources: CHAS. Note 5: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 420 of ? Table 11 – Publicly Supported Housing by Program Category - Units by Number of Bedrooms and Number of Children, Contra Costa County, Antioch, Concord, Pittsburg, Walnut Creek Housing Type Households in 0-1 Bedroom Units Households in 2 Bedroom Units Households in 3+ Bedroom Units Households with Children # % # % # % # % Contra Costa County Public Housing 507 36.95 % 417 30.39% 349 25.44% 441 32.14% Project-Based Section 8 1,192 47.13% 718 28.39% 587 23.21% 922 36.46% Other Multifamily 804 95.04% 27 3.19% 0 0.00% 3 0.35% HCV Program 2,239 24.54% 3,238 35.49% 3,587 38.22% 3,806 41.71% Antioch Public Housing 82 63.57% 41 31.78% 6 4.65% 9 6.98% Project-Based Section 8 0 0.00% 68 56.67% 51 42.50% 84 70.00% Other Multifamily 115 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% N/A N/A HCV Program 181 8.56% 715 33.82% 1,196 56.58% 1,216 57.52% Concord Public Housing 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% N/A N/A Project-Based Section 8 264 71.93% 52 14.17% 48 13.08% 56 15.26% Other Multifamily 10 90.91% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% N/A N/A HCV Program 288 33.41% 360 41.76% 180 20.88% 206 23.90% Pittsburg Public Housing 24 14.91% 83 51.55% 54 33.54% 72 44.72% Project-Based Section 8 158 49.84% 74 23.34% 84 26.50% 96 30.28% Other Multifamily 244 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% N/A N/A HCV Program 198 21.24% 265 28.43% 451 48.39% 434 46.57% Walnut Creek Public Housing 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% N/a N/a Project-Based Section 8 165 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% N/a N/a Other Multifamily 33 100.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% N/a N/a HCV Program 64 45.71% 50 35.71% 17 12.14% 20 14.29% 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 421 of ? Table 12 – Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity, Contra Costa County and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region Race/Ethnicity Homeowners Renters Homeowners Renters # % # % # % # % Contra Costa Region Non-Hispanic White 157,510 63.55% 55,844 43.63% 513,295 58.19% 328,315 44.07% Black 14,764 5.96% 19,518 15.25% 47,205 5.35% 93,885 12.60% Asian/Pacific Island 36,288 14.64% 15,109 11.80% 200,525 22.73% 146,485 19.66% Native American 632 0.25% 583 0.46% 1,904 0.22% 2,945 0.40% Other 5,817 2.35% 4,599 3.59% 18,140 2.06% 25,620 3.44% Hispanic 32,815 13.24% 32,425 25.33% 101,040 11.45% 147,765 19.83% Total Household Units 247,855 - 127,998 - 882,115 - 745,010 - Antioch Concord Race/Ethnicity Homeowners Renters Homeowners Renters # % # % # % # % Non-Hispanic White 9,730 48.66% 3,900 31.91% 19,065 70.18% 7,920 44.71% Black 2,455 12.28% 3,270 26.76% 520 1.91% 1,180 6.66% Asian/Pacific Island 2,355 11.78% 900 7.36% 3,065 11.28% 2,105 11.88% Native American 115 0.58% 70 0.57% 89 0.33% 55 0.31% Other 715 3.58% 310 2.54% 635 2.34% 680 3.84% Hispanic 4,615 23.08% 3,785 30.97% 3,785 13.93% 5,775 32.60% Total Household Units 19,995 - 12,220 - 27,165 - 17,715 - Pittsburg Walnut Creek Race/Ethnicity Homeowners Renters Homeowners Renters # % # % # % # % Non-Hispanic White 3,555 32.23% 1,995 23.25% 16,390 82.13% 7,010 70.84% Black 1,860 16.86% 2,145 25.00% 130 0.65% 265 2.68% Asian/Pacific Island 1,990 18.04% 860 10.02% 2,294 11.50% 1,135 11.47% Native American 15 0.14% 60 0.70% 40 0.20% 40 0.40% Other 340 3.08% 285 3.32% 135 0.68% 310 3.13% Hispanic 3,270 29.65% 3,240 37.76% 960 4.81% 1,140 11.52% Total Household Units 11,030 - 8,580 - 19,955 - 9,895 - Table 13 – Home Loan Application Denial Rates by Race/Ethnicity Race/ Ethnicity FHA, FSA/ RHA, and VA Home- Purchase Loans Conventional Home-Purchase Loans Refinance Loans Home Improvement Loans Multi-Family Homes Not Hispanic White 9.2% 8.0% 16.6% 19.5% 9.5% Black 14.8% 13.5% 27.1% 34.6% 29.4% Asian 13.1% 9.8% 15.2% 19.3% 12.3% Hispanic 11.3% 12.0% 22.3% 31.0% 28.6% 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 422 of ? Maps Map 1: Demographics of Households with Housing Problems with Race/Ethnicity, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 423 of ? Map 2: Households with Housing Problems with Race/Ethnicity, San Francisco – Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 424 of ? Map 3: Housing Burden, Contra Costa County 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 425 of ? Map 4: Housing Burden, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 426 of ? Publicly Supported Housing Tables Table 1 – Publicly Supported Households by Race/Ethnicity, Contra Costa Consortium Housing Type White Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander # % # % # % # % Contra Costa County Public Housing 239 19.00 691 54.93 236 18.76 78 6.20 Project-Based Rental Assistance-PBRA 682 27.56 911 36.81 510 20.61 361 14.59 Other Multifamily 258 32.53 131 16.52 164 20.68 231 29.13 Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) 1,983 22.36 5,482 61.82 750 8.46 624 7.04 Total CCC Households 213,302 56.75 34,275 9.12 65,201 17.35 51,353 13.66 0-30% of AMI 20,357 41.95 9,158 18.87 11,845 24.41 5,439 11.21 0-50% of AMI 33,599 37.15 13,836 15.30 23,999 26.54 9,452 10.45 0-80% of AMI 56,152 41.12 18,518 13.56 35,938 26.32 14,930 10.93 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA Region Public Housing 1,240 16.55 3,515 46.90 1,105 14.75 1,605 21.42 PBRA 4,446 25.35 4,273 24.37 1,899 10.83 6,762 38.56 Other Multifamily 811 25.28 462 14.40 384 11.97 1,526 47.57 HCV Program N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Region Households 841,640 51.73 141,095 8.67 248,785 15.29 347,022 21.33 0-30% of AMI 94,495 36.82 44,320 17.27 49,170 19.16 59,085 23.02 0-50% of AMI 153,315 34.49 65,385 14.71 96,510 21.71 93,534 21.04 0-80% of AMI 256,205 38.15 87,195 12.99 146,695 21.85 138,723 20.66 Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census; APSH; CHAS. Note 2: Numbers presented are numbers of households not individuals. Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 2 – All Publicly Supported Households by Race and Ethnicity, Contra Costa County Public Housing PBRA Other Multifamily HCV Program White 8% 22% 8% 63% Black 10% 13% 2% 76% Hispanic 14% 31% 10% 45% Asian/Pacific Islander 6% 28% 18% 48% Note: Numbers rounded to the nearest whole number. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 427 of ? Table 3 – Publicly Supported Households by Race/Ethnicity, Antioch Housing Type White Black Hispanic Asian Pacific Isl # % # % # % # % Public Housing 49 37.98 36 27.91 32 24.81 11 8.53 PBRA 20 16.81 42 35.29 50 42.02 7 5.88 Other Multifamily 28 25.00 5 4.46 39 34.82 38 33.93 HCV Program 390 18.84 1,464 70.72 164 7.92 48 2.32 Table 4 – Publicly Supported Households by Race/Ethnicity, Concord Housing Type White Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific Isl # % # % # % # % Public Housing N/A N/A 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A PBRA 180 50.00 16 4.44 83 23.06 79 21.94 Other Multifamily 3 42.86 1 14.29 3 42.86 0 0 HCV Program 389 48.14 238 29.46 61 7.55 112 13.86 Table 5 – Publicly Supported Households by Race/Ethnicity, Pittsburg Housing Type White Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific Isl # % # % # % # % Public Housing 25 15.92 93 59.24 32 20.38 6 3.82 PBRA 86 27.74 54 17.42 137 44.19 30 9.68 Other Multifamily 58 24.37 56 23.53 62 26.05 61 25.63 HCV Program 137 15.15 629 69.58 100 11.06 36 3.98 Table 6 – Publicly Supported Households by Race/Ethnicity, Walnut Creek Housing Type White Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific Isl # % # % # % # % Public Housing N/A N/A 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A PBRA 130 80.75 0 0 4 2.48 27 16.77 Other Multifamily 21 67.74 0 0 0 0 10 32.26 HCV Program 80 64.00 24 19.20 5 4.00 14 11.20 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 428 of ? Table 7: R/ECAP and Non-R/ECAP Demographics by Publicly Supported Housing Program Category, Contra Costa County Total # units (occupied) % White % Black % Asian/ Pacific Isl % Hispanic % Families w/children % Elderly % with a Disability Public Housing R/ECAP tracts N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Non R/ECAP tracts 1,186 17.12 58.30 6.60 16.85 32.54 26.21 37.85 PBRA R/ECAP tracts N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Non R/ECAP tracts 2,462 27.56 36.81 14.59 20.61 36.46 42.74 11.19 Other Multifamily R/ECAP tracts N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Non R/ECAP tracts 810 32.53 16.52 29.13 20.68 0.35 89.01 13.83 HCV Program R/ECAP tracts 46 34.78 47.83 8.70 8.70 20.41 20.41 42.86 Non R/ECAP tracts 8,542 22.22 61.99 7.02 8.46 41.88 26.18 26.29 Note 1: Disability information is often reported for heads of household or spouse/co -head only. Here, the data reflects information on all members of the household. Note 2: Data Sources: APSH (HUD Picture of Subsidized Households) Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation Table 8 – HACCC Publicly Supported Housing and Census Tract Demographics Project Name Community Census Tract Tract % poverty Tract % Black Tract % Hispanic HUD AFFH list Bridgemont Antioch 3050 25.2 17.9 46.5 Elder Winds Antioch 3072.05 18.8 19.7 37.8 * Los Nogales Brentwood 3040.01 9.1 3 15.4 Alhambra Terrace Martinez 3190 11.2 2 21 * Hacienda Martinez 3170 9.8 8.1 11.1 Las Deltas North Richmond 3650.02 33.9 20.8 60.5 * Los Arboles Oakley 3020.07 7.5 9.2 39.5 Casa de Manana Oakley 3020.07 7.5 9.2 39.5 Casa de Serena Pittsburg 3141.04 30.2 14 63.4 * El Pueblo Pittsburg 3120 37.1 36 42.6 * Bayo Vista Rodeo 3580 15.1 15.7 31.1 * Kidd Manor San Pablo 3671 20.4 37.3 37.2 Vista Del Camino San Pablo 3672 19.8 14.5 45.3 * Note 1: Highlighted tracts considered "R/ECAP” at 25% poverty definition Note 2: Submitted by HACCC - ACS 2012-2016 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 429 of ? Table 9 – Demographics of Publicly Supported Housing Developments Project Name # of Units Families with Children Housing % White Housing % Black Housing % Hispanic Housing % Asian Bridgemont Apts 36 7 18 13 12 0 Elder Winds 134 9 38 28 25 9 Casa de Serena 50 N/A 34 36 13 11 El Pueblo 171 77 16 58 20 4 Los Nogales 44 15 33 11 18 0 Alhambra Terrace 100 10 44 16 18 18 Hacienda 50 2 31 8 8 6 Las Deltas 214 RAD conversion in process Los Arboles 30 15 21 9 13 0 Casa de Manana 40 2 30 9 11 1 Bayo Vista 241 147 15 63 15 0 Kidd Manor 41 0 12 25 7 4 Vista Del Camino 141 38 12 51 21 15 Note: AFFH and local data Table 10 – RHA Public Housing and Census Tract Demographics Project Name Census Tract Tract % poverty Tract % Black Tract % Hispanic Nystrom Village 3790.00 23.01 31.8 60.1 Nevin Plaza 3740.00 20.71 16.3 50.5 Note: 2015 Census Table 11 - Public Housing Resident Demographics RHA Jurisdiction Project Name # of units Families w/ Children Housing % White Housing % Black Housing % Asian Housing % Hispanic Disabled unit Nystrom Village* 100 34 21 76 0 19 22 Nevin Plaza** 142 14 16 82 2 9 111 Note: Effective Dates: 1/1/17 – 4/30/18 * Statistics based on 85 of 100 Family Reports (50058) Received ** Statistics based on 116 of 142 Family Reports (50058) Received 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 430 of ? Table 12 – Census Tracts with the Largest Number of LIHTC Properties (in descending order) Contra Costa County Community Census Tract # Dvlpmts # Units % Black % Hisp % Pov Large Family Senior Non- Targeted Other Richmond 3820 7 1226 43 34 22 4 0 2 1 Oakley 3020.05 9 609 4 37 19 3 5 1 0 Pittsburg 3131.01 4 581 13 35 28 3 1 0 0 Richmond 3770 7 575 17 59 25 2 2 2 1 Walnut Creek 3240.01 4 505 3 13 9 4 0 0 0 Baypoint 3141.04 6 426 14 59 30 3 0 3 0 Concord 3362.02 4 380 2 68 37 0 0 4 0 Brentwood 3031.03 5 322 5 36 11 4 1 0 0 Richmond 3760 4 249 25 63 34 0 1 3 0 Walnut Creek 3400.01 5 190 1 17 11 3 1 1 0 Pittsburg 3100 4 58 17 60 22 1 0 3 0 Total: 11 tracts 59 5121 5% of census tracts 42% of all dvlpmts 35% of all units Table 13 – Demographics of Occupied HCV units in R/ECAP vs non-R/ECAP Census Tracts, City of Concord Total # units (occupied) % White % Black % Hispanic % Asian / Pacific Isl % Families w/ children % Elderly % with a disability R/ECAP tracts 46 34.78 47.83 8.70 8.70 20.41 20.41 42.86 Non R/ECAP tracts 753 48.95 28.35 7.48 14.17 24.11 33.46 34.07 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 431 of ? Table 14 – Public Housing Developments and Demographics, Contra Costa County Development City PHA Name # Units White Black Hispanic Asian Households w/ Children Elder Winds Antioch HACCC 134 38% 28% 25% 9% 7% Casa De Serena Bay Point HACCC 50 34% 36% 13% 11% N/A Alhambra Terrace Martinez HACCC 100 44% 16% 18% 18% 10% El Pueblo Pittsburg HACCC 171 16% 58% 20% 4% 45% Bayo Vista Rodeo HACCC 241 15% 63% 15% 5% 61% Vista Del Camino San Pablo HACCC 141 12% 51% 21% 15% 27% Las Deltas Annex 1 Richmond HACCC 138 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Las Deltas Richmond HACCC 76 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Nevin Plaza Richmond RHA 142 9% 80% 7% 3% 2% Nystrom Village Richmond RHA 100 5% 76% 17% 0% 45% Richmond Village I Richmond RHA 70 0% 85% 13% 1% 66% Richmond Village II Richmond RHA 61 4% 79% 18% 0% 61% Richmond Village III Richmond RHA 36 0% 77% 14% 9% 72% Table 15 – Project-Based Rental Assistance Developments and Demographics, Contra Costa County Development City # Units % White % Black % Hispanic % Asian % Households w Children Hudson Townhouse Manor Antioch 119 17 35 42 6 70 Willowbrook Apts Bay Point 72 8 39 26 26 41 Concord Residential Club Concord 19 74 N/A 16 11 N/A Clayton Villa Apts Concord 79 52 N/A 13 35 N/A The Heritage Apts Concord 121 64 2 18 15 N/A La Vista Apts Concord 75 21 5 55 18 32 Eskaton Hazel Shirley Manor El Cerrito 63 26 8 3 61 N/A The Arbors Apts Hercules 23 4 74 22 N/A 44 Chateau Lafayette Lafayette 67 81 N/A 8 11 N/A Emerson Arms Martinez 32 52 39 10 N/A 83 Hidden Creek Townhomes Martinez 57 36 17 14 32 56 Orinda Senior Village Orinda 150 66 2 9 23 N/A Chilpancingo Vista Apts Pleasant Hill 25 85 12 0 4 8 Coggins Square Apts Pleasant Hill 5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A East Santa Fe Avenue Apts Pittsburg 19 13 33 40 7 7 Lido Square I Apts Pittsburg 162 10 19 59 11 60 Stoneman Village Pittsburg 145 49 14 27 9 N/A Barrett Plaza Townhouses Richmond 58 0 60 21 19 76 Barrett Terrace Apts Richmond 114 1 66 9 24 39 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 432 of ? Crescent Park Apts Richmond 341 1 84 12 3 52 Deliverance Temple II Richmond 82 13 76 9 3 74 Pullman Point Apts Richmond 192 3 72 14 10 65 St Johns Apts Richmond 158 1 61 37 1 68 El Portal Gardens Apts San Pablo 81 19 11 13 56 N/A Rumrill Gardens Apts San Pablo 60 5 53 30 12 63 Casa Montego Apts Walnut Creek 79 70 N/A 3 27 N/A Creekside Terrace Apts Walnut Creek 56 43 24 22 11 65 Tice Oaks Apts Walnut Creek 91 87 1 3 9 N/A Table 16 – Other Multifamily Assisted Housing, Contra Costa County Development City # Units % White % Black % Hispanic % Asian % Households w Children Antioch Rivertown Senior Antioch 50 17 4 42 35 N/A Sycamore Place Antioch 40 75 3 20 N/A N/A Antioch Hillcrest Terrace Antioch 65 32 5 30 32 N/A Caldera Place Apartments Concord 12 36 18 36 9 N/A Columbia Park Manor Pittsburg 79 21 42 19 18 N/A Presidio Village Senior Hsg. Pittsburg 104 30 15 31 23 N/A Stoneman Village II Pittsburg 60 19 15 26 40 N/A Montego Place Walnut Creek 33 64 N/A 3 33 N/A Carquinez Vista Manor Crockett 36 47 19 14 19 N/A Sycamore Place II Danville 39 51 10 21 5 N/A A Better Chance Apts El Sobrante 8 57 29 7 7 N/A El Sobrante El Sobrante 49 14 2 14 67 N/A Aspen Court Apartments Martinez 11 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Silver Oak Apts Oakley 23 57 17 26 N/A 4 Alvarez Court Apartments Pinole 18 16 47 32 N/A 16 Rodeo Gateway Rodeo 49 37 4 14 45 N/A Valley Vista Senior Housing San Ramon 89 23 5 8 63 N/A Community Heritage Senior Apartments Richmond 51 8 68 15 9 N/A Note 1: For LIHTC properties, this information will be supplied by local knowledge. Note 2: Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding error. Note 3: Data Sources: APSH. Note 4: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 433 of ? Table 17 – Public Housing Development Demographics vs. Census Tract Demographics, Contra Costa County Development PHA Name White Black Hispanic Asian Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Vista Del Camino HACCC 12% 9% 51% 43% 21% 30% 15% 13% El Pueblo HACCC 16% 11% 58% 39% 20% 38% 4% 7% Las Deltas Annex 1 HACCC N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Las Deltas HACCC N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Casa De Serena HACCC 34% 20% 36% 15% 13% 51% 11% 9% Elder Winds HACCC 38% 39% 28% 17% 25% 31% 9% 7% Richmond Village III RHA 0% 28% 77% 28% 14% 23% 9% 16% Alhambra Terrace HACCC 44% 72% 16% 4% 18% 15% 18% 3% Bayo Vista HACCC 15% 40% 63% 17% 15% 25% 5% 12% Nystrom Village RHA 5% 2% 76% 40% 17% 53% N/A 2% Nevin Plaza RHA 9% 19% 80% 19% 7% 50% 3% 8% Richmond Village I RHA 0% 28% 85% 28% 13% 23% 1% 16% Richmond Village II RHA 4% 28% 79% 28% 18% 23% N/A 16% Note: Source: Data from HUD Table 8 alongside data compiled from HUD Map 5 Query Tool. Table 18 – Project-Based Rental Assistance Development Demographics vs. Census Tract Demographics, Contra Costa County Development % White % Black % Hispanic % Asian Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Arbors Apartments 4 9 74 53 22 25 N/A 8 The Heritage 64 49 2 7 18 22 15 18 Tice Oaks Apartments 87 80 1 1 3 6 9 8 Willowbrook Apartments 8 20 39 15 26 51 26 9 Coggins Square Apartments N/A 57 N/A 4 N/A 13 N/A 19 Casa Montego 70 77 N/A 2 3 7 27 10 Chateau Lafayette 81 77 0 1 8 8 11 10 Chilpancingo Vista 85 51 12 3 0 14 4 27 Clayton Villa 52 54 N/A 4 13 21 35 15 Hidden Creek Townhomes 36 36 17 5 14 42 32 11 Pullman Point 3 5 72 44 14 43 10 5 Rubicon Homes N/A 5 N/A 11 N/A 77 N/A 6 Rumrill Gardens 5 6 53 78 30 6 12 8 St Johns Apts 1 7 61 23 37 63 1 5 Stoneman Village 49 22 14 20 27 29 9 14 Emerson Arms 52 52 39 19 10 21 N/A 3 Hudson Townhouse Manor 17 31 35 14 42 46 6 5 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 434 of ? La Vista Apartments 21 61 5 3 55 20 18 9 Lido Square I 10 13 19 15 59 57 11 10 Orinda Senior Village 66 38 2 7 9 39 23 7 Phoenix Apartments 82 61 18 3 0 20 N/A 9 Eskaton Hazel Shirley Manor 26 30 8 14 3 17 61 33 Concord Residential Club 74 49 0 22 16 7 11 18 Creekside Terrace 43 37 24 15 22 21 11 21 Crescent Park 1 9 84 53 12 25 3 8 Deliverance Temple I 13 9 76 53 9 25 3 8 East Santa Fe Avenue Apartments 13 14 33 18 40 54 7 10 El Portal Gardens 19 15 11 23 13 41 56 16 Barrett Plaza Townhouses 0 3 60 32 21 56 19 6 Barrett Terrace Apartments 1 3 66 32 9 56 24 6 Note: Source: Data from HUD Table 8 alongside data compiled from HUD Map 5 Query Tool. Table 19 – Other Multifamily Assisted Development Demographics vs. Census Tract Demographics, Contra Costa County Development % White % Black % Hispanic % Asian Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract A Better Chance Apartments 57 32 29 21 7 24 7 17 Montego Place 64 11 0 39 3 38 33 7 Valley Vista Senior Housing 23 58 5 2 8 8 63 23 Antioch Rivertown Senior 17 46 4 9 42 37 35 2 Sycamore Place 75 44 3 6 20 41 N/A 4 Columbia Park Manor 21 11 42 38 19 39 18 7 El Sobrante 14 36 2 14 14 14 67 31 Peace Grove Inc 63 76 21 2 11 10 5 8 Stoneman Village Ii 19 22 15 20 26 39 40 14 Community Heritage Senior Housing 8 3 68 31 15 54 9 8 Carquinez Vista Manor 47 72 19 4 14 15 19 3 Aspen Court Apartments N/A 51 N/A 3 N/A 14 N/A 27 Silver Oak 57 46 17 7 26 39 N/A 3 Caldera Place Apartments 36 50 18 3 36 34 9 8 Alvarez Court Apartments 16 35 47 17 32 19 N/A 24 Antioch Hillcrest Terrace 32 46 5 37 30 9 32 2 Rodeo Gateway 37 10 4 20 14 8 45 56 Presidio Village Senior Hsg. 30 22 15 20 31 39 23 14 Sycamore Place II 51 44 10 6 21 41 5 4 Note: Source: Data from HUD Table 8 alongside data from HUD Map 5 Query tool. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 435 of ? Table 20 – Demographics of Publicly Supported Housing Development, by Program Category and Census Tract, City of Antioch Development # of Units % White % Black % Hispanic % Asian Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Public Housing Elder Winds 134 38 39 28 17 25 31 9 7 PBRA Hudson Townhouse Manor 119 17 31 35 14 42 46 6 5 Other Multifamily Assisted Housing Antioch Rivertown Senior 50 17 46 4 9 42 37 35 2 Antioch Hillcrest Terrace 65 32 46 5 37 30 9 32 2 Table 21 – Demographics of Publicly Supported Housing Development, by Program Category and Census Tract, City of Concord Development # of Units % White % Black % Hispanic % Asian Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract PBRA The Heritage 121 64 49 2 7 18 22 15 18 Clayton Villa 79 52 54 N/A 4 13 21 39 15 Hidden Creek Townhomes 57 36 36 17 5 14 42 32 11 Concord Residential Club 19 74 49 N/A 7 16 22 11 18 La Vista Apartments 75 21 61 5 3 55 20 18 9 Phoenix Apartments 11 82 N/A 18 N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A Other Multifamily Assisted Housing Caldera Place Apartments 12 36 50 18 3 36 34 9 8 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 436 of ? Table 22 – Demographics of Publicly Supported Housing Development, by Program Category and Census Tract, City of Pittsburg Development # of Units % White % Black % Hispanic % Asian Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Public Housing El Pueblo 171 16 11 58 39 20 38 4 7 PBRA Stoneman Village 145 49 22 14 20 27 39 9 14 Lido Square I 162 10 13 19 15 59 57 11 10 East Santa Fe Avenue Apt 19 13 14 33 18 40 54 7 10 Other Multifamily Assisted Housing Columbia Park Manor 79 21 11 42 39 19 38 18 7 Stoneman Village II 60 19 22 15 20 26 39 40 14 Presidio Village Senior Hsg 104 30 22 15 20 31 39 23 14 Table 23 – Demographics of Publicly Supported Housing Development, by Program Category and Census Tract, City of Walnut Creek Development # of Units White Black Hispanic Asian Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Property Census Tract Tice Oaks Apartments 91 87 81 1 1 3 6 9 8 Casa Montego 79 70 77 0 2 3 7 2 10 Montego Place 33 64 77 0 2 3 7 33 10 Note 1: For LIHTC properties, this information will be supplied by local knowledge. Note 2: Percentages may not add to 100 du e to rounding. Note 3: Data Sources: APSH. Note 4: Refer to the Data Documentation for details: www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 437 of ? Maps Map 1: Publicly Supported Housing and Race/Ethnicity 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 438 of ? Map 2 (custom): Contra Costa County Distress Index by Census Tract 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 439 of ? Map 3: PBRA Housing and Race/Ethnicity Map 4: Other Multifamily Housing and Race/Ethnicity 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 440 of ? Map 5: HCV Units and Race/Ethnicity Map 6: LIHTC and Race/Ethnicity 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 441 of ? Map 7: Publicly Supported Housing and Race/Ethnicity, Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 442 of ? Map 8: HCV Units and Race/Ethnicity, Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 443 of ? Map 9: Publicly Supported Housing and Race/Ethnicity, Concord Map 10: HCV Units and Race/Ethnicity, Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 444 of ? Map 11: Publicly Supported Housing and Race/Ethnicity, Pittsburg Map 12: HCV Units and Race/Ethnicity, Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 445 of ? Map 13: Publicly Supported Housing and Race/Ethnicity, Walnut Creek Map 14: HCV Units and Race/Ethnicity, Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 446 of ? Map 15 – Publicly Supported Housing in the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 447 of ? Map 16: School Proficiency Index with Publicly Supported Housing Overlay Map 17: Job Proximity Index with Publicly Supported Housing Overlay 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 448 of ? Map 18: Labor Market Index with Publicly Supported Housing Overlay Map 19: Transit Trips Index with Publicly Supported Housing Overlay 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 449 of ? Map 20: Low Transportation Cost Index with Publicly Supported Housing Overlay Map 21: Low Poverty Index with Publicly Supported Housing Overlay 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 450 of ? Map 22: Environmental Health Index with Publicly Supported Housing Overlay Map 23: CalEnviroScreen Index with Publicly Supported Housing Overlay 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 451 of ? Disability and Access Tables Table 1 – Disability by Type Type of Disability or Difficulty Antioch Concord Pittsburg Walnut Crk County Region # % # % # % # % # % # % Hearing 3,009 3.11 3,409 3 1,727 2.89 2,626 4.25 33,812 3.1 124,230 2.7 Vision 2,199 2.27 2,264 1.99 1,650 2.76 1,161 1.88 21,416 1.9 78,552 1.7 Cognitive 5,580 5.77 4,734 4.16 3,552 5.94 2,020 3.27 47,984 4.6 172,906 4 Ambulatory 6,524 6.75 6,817 6 4,631 7.75 4,250 6.88 60,768 5.9 232,883 5.4 Self-care 2,600 2.69 2,357 2.07 1,677 2.81 1,405 2.28 24,911 2.4 104,344 2.4 Independent Living 4,646 4.81 4,439 3.9 3,055 5.11 2,997 4.85 44,001 5.2 183,931 5.1 Table 2 – Disability by Type in R/ECAPs in Contra Costa County and Region Disability or Difficulty Type R/ECAPS Contra Costa Region % % % Hearing 3.3 3.1 2.7 Vision 3 1.9 1.7 Cognitive 8.4 4.6 4 Ambulatory 9.6 5.9 5.4 Self-care 3.7 2.4 2.4 Independent living 7.9 5.2 5.1 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 452 of ? Table 3 – Disability by Publicly Supported Housing Program Category Type of Supported Housing Program # people with a disability % of total residents Walnut Creek Public Housing n/a448 n/a Project-Based Section 8 5 3.03 Other Multifamily 0 0 HCV Program 70 50 Concord Public Housing n/a n/a Project-Based Section 8 54 14.71 Other Multifamily 10 90.91 HCV Program 298 34.57 Pittsburg Public Housing 51 31.66 Project-Based Section 8 40 12.62 Other Multifamily 14 5.74 HCV Program 239 25.64 Antioch Public Housing 87 67.44 Project-Based Section 8 8 6.67 Other Multifamily 7 6.09 HCV Program 428 20.25 Contra Costa County Public Housing 523 38.12 Project-Based Section 8 283 11.19 Other Multifamily 117 13.83 HCV Program 2405 26.36 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region Public Housing 2437 31.74 Project-Based Section 8 1902 10.57 Other Multifamily 453 13.23 HCV Program 11432 27.34 448 N/A indicates that that category of housing does not exist, while a 0 indicates that no one within that category has a disability. 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 453 of ? Table 4 – Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Performance of Regional Centers in San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region, December 2017 Fewer consumers live in develop- mental centers More children live with families More adults live in home settings Fewer children live in large facilities (more than 6 people) Fewer adults live in large facilities (more than 6 people) State Average 0.21% 99.32% 79.61% 0.04% 2.47% Regional Center of the East Bay 0.48% 98.99% 76.56% 0.03% 2.60% Golden Gate Regional Center 0.55% 99.14% 74.19% 0.00% 3.00% Table 5 – Type of Setting by Race or Ethnicity, Regional Center of the East Bay, 2016 -2017 Type of Setting Total Served % White % Black % Asian/ Pacific Isl % Other or Multi-Racial % Hispanic Home 16,499 22.2% 14.4% 21.6% 14.9% 26.7% Residential 2,385 52.5% 19.5% 10.6% 7.2% 9.7% ILS/SLS 1,902 49.7% 30.5% 5.6% 5.8% 8.0% Institutions 40 10.0% 50.0% 2.5% 20.0% 17.5% Med/Rehab/Psych 106 53.8% 23.6% 4.7% 9.4% 7.5% Other 97 30.9% 42.3% 7.2% 13.4% 6.2% Table 6 – 2011-2013 ACS 3-year Estimates, civilian noninstitutionalized population aged 18 - 64, employment and disability Disabled Persons Antioch Concord Pittsburg Walnut Creek County Region % in labor force 42% 44% 41% 64% 43% 43% % employed 77% 96% 75% 81% 81% 86% Table 7 – 2016 Employment Metrics for Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities by Regional Center Regional Center Percentage of Adults Earning Below Minimum Wage Percentage of Consumers with Earned Income Percentage of Adults with a Paid Job in a Community- Based Setting Percentage of Adults with Integrated Employment As a Goal in Their Individual Program Plan Percentage of Adults Current Unemployed But Wanting a Job in the Community State Average 53% 14.6% 13% 27% 45% Regional Center of the East Bay 42% 17.1% 10% 21% 41% 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 454 of ? Maps Map 1 – Disability by Type (Hearing, Vision, Cognitive), San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region Map 2 – Disability by Type (Ambulatory, Self-Care, Independent Living), San Francisco-Oakland- Hayward Region 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 455 of ? Map 3 – Disability by Age, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Region Map 4 – Disability by Type (Hearing, Vision, Cognitive), Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 456 of ? Map 5 – Disability by Type (Ambulatory, Self-Care, Independent Living), Antioch Map 6 – Disability by Age, Antioch 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 457 of ? Map 7 – Disability by Type (Hearing, Vision, Cognitive), Concord Map 8 – Disability by Type (Ambulatory, Self-Care, Independent Living), Concord 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 458 of ? Map 9 – Disability by Age, Concord Map 10 – Disability by Type (Hearing, Vision, Cognitive), Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 459 of ? Map 11 – Disability by Type (Ambulatory, Self-Care, Independent Living), Pittsburg Map 12 – Disability by Age, Pittsburg 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 460 of ? Map 13 – Disability by Type (Hearing, Vision, Cognitive), Walnut Creek Map 14 – Disability by Type (Ambulatory, Self-Care, Independent Living), Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 461 of ? Map 15 – Disability by Age, Walnut Creek 2020-25 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice – Contra Costa County – Page 462 of ? Fair Housing Enforcement, Outreach Capacity, and Resources Analysis Tables Table 1 - DFEH Complaint Trends 2011-2017, Contra Costa County Year Employment Housing Ralph Civil Rights Act Unruh Civil Rights Act Disabled Persons Act Grand Total 2017 124 26 2 26 359 2016 351 32 2 385 2015 354 30 4 5 393 2014 476 38 2 8 1 525 2013 493 33 4 10 2 542 2012 499 32 3 7 541 2011 528 17 2 4 551 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Treasurer's Quarterly Investment Report as of March 31, 2019, as recommended by the County Treasurer-Tax Collector. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 53646 requires the County Treasurer to prepare quarterly reports to the Board of Supervisors describing County investments including type, par value, cost, and market value. Attached please find the report covering the period January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2019. As of March 31, 2019, the par value, cost, and market value of Contra Costa County Investment Pool were $3,724,111,094.19, $3,705,990,210.95, and $3,714,709,510.44, respectively. The weighted yield to maturity was 2.48% and the weighted average days to maturity were 173 days. As of March 31, 2019, the Treasurer’s investment portfolio was in compliance with Government Code 53600 et. seq. and with the Treasurer’s current investment policy. Historical activities combined with future cash flow projections indicate that the County has sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations for the next six months. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ronda Boler, (925) 957-2806 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C.168 To:Board of Supervisors From:Russell Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:ADOPTION OF THE QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT AS OF 3/31/2019 ATTACHMENTS Q1_2019 TOC Report_Final CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TREASURER’S QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT AS OF MARCH 31, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Executive Summary 1 II. Contra Costa County Investment Pool Summary 2 III. Appendix A. Investment Portfolio Detail—Managed by Treasurer’s Office 1. Portfolio Statement 6 2. Market Valuation Sources 23 B. Investment Portfolio Detail – Managed by Outside Contracted Parties 1. PFM 24 2. State of California Local Agency Investment Fund 38 3. Wells Capital Management 39 4. CalTRUST Short Term 95 5. CalTRUST Liquidity 95 6. Other a. East Bay Regional Communications System Authority (EBRCS) 103 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  The Treasurer's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code 53600 et. seq..  The Treasurer's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Treasurer's current investment policy.  The Treasurer’s investment portfolio has no securities lending, reverse repurchase agreements or derivatives.  As of 3/31/19, the fair value of the Treasurer’s investment portfolio was 1.0024% of the cost. More than 84 percent of the portfolio or over $3.13 billion will mature in less than a year. Historical activities combined with future cash flow projections indicate that the County is able to meet its cash flow needs for the next six months.  Treasurer’s Investment Portfolio Characteristics Par $3,724,111,094.19 Cost $3,705,990,210.95 Market Value $3,714,709,510.44 Weighted Yield to Maturity 2.48% Weighted Average Days to Maturity 173 days Weighted Duration 0.46 year Notes: 1. All reporting information is unaudited but due diligence was utilized in its preparation. 2. There may be slight differences between the investment pool summary pages and the attached statements and exhibits from time to time. The variances are largely due to the timing difference in recording and/or posting transactions, interests, security values, etc. 3. All securities and amounts reported are denominated in U.S. Dollars. Page 1 PERCENT OF TYPE PAR VALUE COST FAIR VALUE TOTAL COST A. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office 1. U.S. Treasuries (STRIPS, Bills, Notes)$128,480,000.00 $127,525,801.85 $128,184,601.35 3.44% 2. U.S. Agencies Federal Home Loan Banks 286,313,000.00 284,873,253.81 285,666,882.48 7.69% Federal National Mortgage Association 37,303,000.00 37,064,722.09 37,058,501.26 1.00% Federal Farm Credit Banks 175,122,000.00 174,918,803.94 174,757,551.16 4.72% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 128,032,000.00 126,528,863.21 126,887,873.66 3.41% Subtotal 626,770,000.00 623,385,643.05 624,370,808.56 16.82% 3. Supranationals - International Government 327,379,000.00 325,512,464.21 326,434,817.23 8.78% 4. Money Market Instruments Commercial Paper 1,057,489,000.00 1,049,052,669.51 1,053,514,947.80 28.31% Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 665,940,000.00 665,940,000.00 666,079,888.51 17.97% Time Deposit 3,397.22 3,397.22 3,397.22 0.00% Subtotal 1,723,432,397.22 1,714,996,066.73 1,719,598,233.53 46.28% 5. Corporate Notes 319,981,000.00 316,914,204.19 318,292,823.49 8.55% TOTAL (Section A.)1 3,126,042,397.22 3,108,334,180.03 3,116,881,284.16 83.87% B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors 1. PFM 127,188,084.78 127,063,960.76 126,873,146.60 3.43% 2. Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 209,835,760.85 209,835,760.85 209,866,597.05 2 5.66% 3. Wells Capital Management 44,531,651.23 44,243,109.20 44,575,282.52 3 1.19% 4. CalTRUST (Short-Term Fund)45,611,144.84 45,611,144.84 45,611,144.84 1.23% 5. CalTRUST (Liquidity Fund)95,007,249.29 95,007,249.29 95,007,249.29 2.56% 6. Other a. EBRCS Bond 1,769,666.58 1,769,666.58 1,769,666.58 0.05% TOTAL (Section B.)523,943,557.57 523,530,891.52 523,703,086.88 14.13% C. Cash 74,125,139.40 74,125,139.40 74,125,139.40 2.00% 4GRAND TOTAL (FOR A , B, & C)$3,724,111,094.19 $3,705,990,210.95 $3,714,709,510.44 100.00% Notes: 1. Excludes funds managed by PFM retained by Contra Costa School Insurance Group and Community College District 2. Estimated Fair Value 3. Base Market Value plus Accrued Interest 4. Does not include the Futuris Public Entity Trust of the Contra Costa Community College District Retirement Board of Authority CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL As of March 31, 2019 Page 2 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL - EARNING STATISTICSFiscal QuarterYear To DateTo DateAverage Daily Balance ($)3,219,451,107.32 3,494,206,816.79Net Earnings ($)54,759,782.00 21,482,096.53Earned Income Yield2.23%2.46%CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL - PORTFOLIO STATISTICSInvestment ParFairYTMWAM PercentageTypeValueValueof($)($)(%)(days) PortfolioU.S. Treasury128,480,000.00 128,184,601.35 2.3839 3.45%Agencies626,770,000.00 624,370,808.56 2.19340 16.81%Commercial Paper1,057,489,000.00 1,053,514,947.80 2.6055 28.36%NCD/YCD665,940,000.00 666,079,888.51 2.6637 17.93%Corporate Notes319,981,000.00 318,292,823.49 2.63494 8.57%Time Deposit3,397.22 3,397.22 0.40420 0.00%Supranationals327,379,000.00 326,434,817.23 2.32304 8.79%PFM127,188,084.78 126,873,146.60 2.13605 3.42%LAIF209,835,760.85 209,866,597.05 2.441 5.65%CalTRUST (Short Term)45,611,144.84 45,611,144.84 2.511 1.23%CalTRUST (Liquidity)95,007,249.29 95,007,249.29 2.530 2.56%Wells Cap44,531,651.23 44,575,282.52 2.55234 1.20%Misc.11,769,666.58 1,769,666.58 0.00 N/A 0.05%Cash 74,125,139.40 74,125,139.40 2.40 0 2.00%Total Fund33,724,111,094.19 3,714,709,510.44 2.48 173 100.00%1. East Bay Regional Communications System Authority.2. Average Earning Allowance for this quarter.3. Excludes the Futuris Public Entity Trust of the CCCCD Retirment Board of Authority.CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL As of March 31, 2019Page 3 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL AT A GLANCE As of March 31, 2019 NOTES TO INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY AND AT A GLANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2019 1. All report information is unaudited but due diligence was utilized in its preparation. 2. There may be slight differences between the portfolio summary page and the attached exhibits and statements for investments managed by outside contractors or trustees. The variance is due to the timing difference in recording transactions associated with outside contracted parties during interim periods and later transmitted to the appropriate county agency and/or the Treasurer’s Office. In general, the Treasurer’s records reflect booked costs at the beginning of a period. 3. All securities and amounts included in the portfolio are denominated in United States Dollars. 4. The Contra Costa County investment portfolio maintains Standard & Poor's highest credit quality rating of AAAf and lowest volatility of S1+. The portfolio consists of a large portion of short-term investments with credit rating of A-1/P-1 or better. The majority of the long-term investments in the portfolio are rated AA or better. 5. In accordance with Contra Costa County's Investment Policy, the Treasurer's Office has constructed a portfolio that safeguards the principal, meets the liquidity needs and achieves a return. As a result, more than 84% of the portfolio will mature in less than a year with a weighted average maturity of 173 days. U.S. Treasuries 3.44% U.S.Agencies 16.82% Supranationals 8.78% Money Market 46.28% Corporate Notes 8.55%PFM 3.43%LAIF 5.66% Wells Cap 1.19% CalTRUST 3.79% Other 0.05% Cash 2.00% PORTFOLIO BREAKDOWN BY INVESTMENT 84.13% 10.53%4.05%1.10% 0.19% $0 $500,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $1,500,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $3,000,000,000 $3,500,000,000 1 yr & less 1 to 2 yrs 2 to 3 yrs 3 to 4 yrs 4+ yrs MATURITY DISTRIBUTION AAA 11.91% AA+ 14.87% AA 8.52% AA‐ 1.95% A+ 0.50%A 0.36%A‐ 0.08% A‐1+ 26.70% A‐1 32.25% NR (CASH) 1.99% NR (Misc.) 0.80% BBB+ 0.08% PORTFOLIO CREDIT QUALITY 2.48%2.50% 2.13% 2.39% 2.55% 2.51%2.53% 2.40% 1.90% 2.00% 2.10% 2.20% 2.30% 2.40% 2.50% 2.60% Total Treasurer PFM LAIF Wells CalTRUST ST CalTRUST LIQ Cash YIELD TO MATURITY BY PORTFOLIO Note: Total Port. consists of 84% Treasurer, 3% of PFM; 6% LAIF, 1% Wells Cap; 4% CalTRUST, and 2% of Cash 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% 3.00% 6/16 9/16 12/16 3/17 6/17 9/17 12/17 3/18 6/18 9/18 12/18 3/19 QUARTERLY WEIGHTED YIELD TO MATURITY YTM County&Agencies 51.94% School Dist. 33.79% Community College Dist. 8.04% Voluntary Participants 6.22% POOL BALANCE BY PARTICIPANTS Note: More than 48% of the School Dist. funds from the bond proceeds Page 4 Note:All data provided by Bloomberg.MAJOR MARKET AND ECONOMIC DATAAS OF MARCH 31, 20190123456703/99 03/02 03/05 03/08 03/11 03/14 03/17PercentageTREASURY YIELDS AND FED TARGET RATEUS 2‐YR TREASURY YIELDUS 5‐YR TREASURY YIELDFEDERAL FUND TARGET RATE‐10‐8‐6‐4‐2024681003/31/1903/31/1603/31/1303/31/1003/31/0703/31/0403/31/0103/31/98PercentageGROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCTGDP QoQ Change‐2‐10123456Mar‐19Mar‐17Mar‐15Mar‐13Mar‐11Mar‐09Mar‐07Mar‐05Mar‐03Mar‐01Mar‐99PercentageCONSUMER PRICE INDEX CPI YoY ChangeCore CPI YoY Change02468101214161820Mar‐00 Mar‐02 Mar‐04 Mar‐06 Mar‐08 Mar‐10 Mar‐12 Mar‐14 Mar‐16 Mar‐18PercentageEMPLOYMENT RELATED RATESUnemployment RateUnderemployment RatePage 5 SECTION III APPENDIX A. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL - MANAGED BY TREASURER’S OFFICE Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 09/08/2020 2.750000 30,000,000.00 99.914000 IDC-FIS -25,800.00 84623 SUPRA INTL FINANCE 45950VMJ2 09/20/2018 2.750000 20,000,000.00 19,982,800.00 35,138.85 26,840.00 09/08/2020 2.865525 19,955,960.00 99.914000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84507 SUPRA IFC NOTE 45950KCM0 06/26/2018 2.250000 20,000,000.00 19,953,600.00 82,500.00 191,000.00 01/25/2021 2.729079 19,762,600.00 99.768000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84589 SUPRA INTL FINANCE 45950VMJ2 09/06/2018 2.750000 30,000,000.00 29,974,200.00 52,708.26 0.00 11/13/2020 3.000000 30,000,000.00 100.141000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84755 RM SUPRA IADB 4581X0CD8 12/06/2018 2.125000 2,000,000.00 1,990,280.00 16,763.89 20,192.00 11/09/2020 2.929235 1,973,275.50 99.514000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84650 RM SUPRA IBRD 459058FQ1 10/11/2018 1.200000 379,000.00 376,487.23 12.63 3,058.53 09/30/2019 2.746752 373,428.70 99.337000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84693 SUPRA INTL FINANCE 45950VMQ6 11/13/2018 3.000000 30,000,000.00 30,042,300.00 345,000.00 42,300.00 07/26/2019 1.345903 4,984,200.00 99.602000 IDC-FIS -4,100.00 09/12/2019 1.530191 9,890,700.00 99.358000 IDC-FIS 0.00 82978 SUP INTL BK RECON &459058EV1 03/10/2016 1.250000 5,000,000.00 4,980,100.00 11,287.50 0.00 07/26/2019 1.530185 9,931,900.00 99.602000 IDC-FIS 0.00 83585 SUPRA INTL BK RECON 459058EV1 01/31/2017 1.250000 10,000,000.00 9,960,200.00 22,569.44 28,300.00 05/13/2019 1.040147 9,988,600.00 99.808000 IDC-FIS -7,800.00 83184 SUP INTER-AMERICAN 458182DX7 06/28/2016 1.000000 10,000,000.00 9,980,800.00 38,333.33 0.00 83435 SUPRA INTL BK RECON 459058FS7 11/29/2016 1.126000 10,000,000.00 9,914,100.00 38,784.97 52,200.00 83473 GOV SUPRA INTER-AME 4581X0BY3 12/07/2016 1.125000 10,000,000.00 9,935,800.00 5,937.50 45,100.00 11/27/2019 1.832388 9,861,900.00 99.141000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84187 SUP INTL BK RECON A 45905US96 02/08/2018 2.400000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 35,333.33 0.00 09/12/2019 1.637439 9,903,800.00 99.358000 IDC-FIS 0.00 02/08/2021 2.400000 10,000,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 01/25/2021 2.336839 19,950,000.00 99.768000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84206 SUPRA IFC 45950KCM0 01/26/2018 2.250000 20,000,000.00 19,953,600.00 82,500.00 3,600.00 03/30/2020 1.602582 19,868,600.00 98.947000 IDC-FIS -79,200.00 83686 SUP INTL BK RECON &459058FA6 04/07/2017 1.376000 20,000,000.00 19,789,400.00 764.44 0.00 83740 SUPRA INTER-AMERICA 458182DX7 05/12/2017 1.000000 10,000,000.00 9,980,800.00 38,333.33 76,200.00 83927 SUPRA INTL BK RECON 4581X0BY3 10/13/2017 1.125000 10,000,000.00 9,935,800.00 5,937.50 32,000.00 05/13/2019 1.485219 9,904,600.00 99.808000 IDC-FIS 0.00 Subtotal 2.055120 217,379,000.00 216,750,267.23 811,904.97 520,790.53 2.261679 216,349,564.20 99.710767 -116,900.00 Inv Type: 1 SUPRANATIONALS Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 6 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 09/12/2019 2.537811 2,535,650.00 98.934988 IDC-FIS 0.00 84620 AUHSD GOV US TREASU 912796RA9 09/17/2018 2.475000 110,000.00 108,828.49 1,482.25 68.74 09/12/2019 2.537811 107,277.50 98.934988 IDC-FIS 0.00 84550 KFPD GOV US TREASUR 912796QC6 07/26/2018 2.210000 250,000.00 249,640.00 3,821.46 8.33 04/25/2019 2.247668 245,810.21 99.856000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84619 AUHSD GOV US TREASU 912796RA9 09/17/2018 2.475000 2,600,000.00 2,572,309.69 35,035.00 1,624.69 06/20/2019 2.485681 4,938,284.03 99.487805 IDC-FIS 0.00 84810 LUHSD GOV TREASURY 912796RU5 12/14/2018 2.480000 10,000,000.00 9,953,377.33 74,400.00 3,666.22 06/13/2019 2.511313 9,875,311.11 99.533773 IDC-FIS 0.00 84818 CCCSD GOV US TREASU 912796QM4 12/21/2018 2.455000 5,000,000.00 4,974,390.24 34,438.19 1,668.02 04/11/2019 2.426397 29,735,450.00 99.945000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84770 GOV US TREASURY BIL 912796RG6 12/07/2018 2.400000 30,000,000.00 29,983,500.00 230,000.00 3,500.00 04/11/2019 2.420168 29,750,000.00 99.945000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84826 RM GOV US TREASURY 912796RW1 01/03/2019 2.415049 1,000,000.00 993,878.87 5,903.45 251.92 08/29/2019 2.469797 3,951,742.22 99.030921 IDC-FIS 0.00 84719 GOV US TREASURY BIL 912796RG6 11/30/2018 2.410000 30,000,000.00 29,983,500.00 244,508.33 3,541.67 07/18/2019 2.454932 1,333,540.31 99.304873 IDC-FIS 0.00 84841 PW GOV US TREASURY 912796QR3 01/18/2019 2.425000 1,350,000.00 1,340,615.78 6,638.44 437.03 07/05/2019 2.445066 987,723.50 99.387887 IDC-FIS 0.00 84898 CCCSD GOV US TREASU 912796SF7 03/04/2019 2.440000 4,000,000.00 3,961,236.84 7,591.11 1,903.51 08/29/2019 2.460224 3,950,860.00 99.030921 IDC-FIS 0.00 84891 CCCSD GOV US TREASU 912796SF7 02/28/2019 2.430000 4,000,000.00 3,961,236.84 8,640.00 1,736.84 Inv Type: 11 TREASURY BILLS 04/05/2019 2.409032 29,762,991.67 99.973000 IDC-FIS -133.33 84919 SUPRA IBRD DISC 459052HH2 03/14/2019 2.420000 25,000,000.00 24,857,250.00 30,250.00 97.22 84769 SUP IBRD DISC 459052DY9 12/07/2018 2.390000 30,000,000.00 29,991,900.00 229,041.66 0.00 84754 SUPRA IFC DISCOUNT 459516EE6 12/03/2018 2.440000 30,000,000.00 29,979,900.00 241,966.67 233.33 04/11/2019 2.461522 29,737,700.00 99.933000 IDC-FIS 0.00 06/26/2019 2.436048 24,835,305.56 99.422000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84929 SUPRA IBRD DISC 459052HJ8 03/20/2019 2.420000 25,000,000.00 24,855,500.00 20,166.67 27.77 06/25/2019 2.436873 24,826,902.78 99.429000 IDC-FIS 0.00 2.435809 109,162,900.01 99.713227 -133.33 Subtotal 2.417269 110,000,000.00 109,684,550.00 521,425.00 358.32 Inv Type: 5 SUPRANATIONALS DISC Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 7 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 06/12/2020 1.180179 1,879,174.00 98.736000 IDC-FIS -37,747.60 83167 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3133834H1 06/10/2016 1.375000 1,865,000.00 1,841,426.40 7,764.36 0.00 83168 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3133834H1 06/10/2016 1.375000 5,265,000.00 5,198,450.40 21,919.28 0.00 83434 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130AA2H0 11/29/2016 1.125000 20,000,000.00 19,834,400.00 76,250.00 0.00 06/12/2020 1.180179 5,305,014.00 98.736000 IDC-FIS -106,563.60 82930 KFPD GOV FHLB NOTES 313381C94 01/27/2016 1.250000 250,000.00 248,017.50 937.50 0.00 12/11/2020 1.513574 248,377.50 98.469000 IDC-FIS -2,205.00 12/13/2019 1.326075 249,282.50 99.207000 IDC-FIS -1,265.00 12/11/2020 1.570027 253,565.00 99.211000 IDC-FIS -5,537.50 82931 KFPD GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3UQ5 01/25/2016 1.875000 250,000.00 248,027.50 1,432.29 0.00 83629 WT GOV FHLB NOTES 3130AABG2 03/08/2017 1.875000 170,000.00 168,191.20 1,080.21 0.00 11/29/2019 1.165139 19,976,400.00 99.172000 IDC-FIS -142,000.00 11/29/2021 2.050128 168,663.80 98.936000 IDC-FIS -472.60 83728 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3130AB5A0 04/27/2017 1.750000 5,000,000.00 4,945,250.00 42,291.67 0.00 82582 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313379EE5 06/08/2015 1.625000 2,500,000.00 2,496,050.00 12,074.65 0.00 82929 KFPD GOV FHLB NOTES 313381CA1 01/27/2016 1.375000 250,000.00 246,172.50 1,050.35 0.00 06/14/2019 1.563094 2,506,000.00 99.842000 IDC-FIS -9,950.00 09/13/2019 1.400130 2,497,575.00 99.512000 IDC-FIS -9,775.00 82694 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313380FB8 09/21/2015 1.375000 2,500,000.00 2,487,800.00 1,718.75 0.00 Inv Type: 22 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 04/30/2019 1.138894 5,021,875.00 99.895000 IDC-FIS -27,125.00 82512 RM GOV US TREASURY 912828ST8 04/15/2015 1.250000 5,000,000.00 4,994,750.00 26,243.09 0.00 83893 WT GOV US TREASURY 9128282S8 09/11/2017 1.625000 170,000.00 166,586.40 240.22 0.00 08/31/2022 1.670000 169,636.30 97.992000 IDC-FIS -3,049.90 1.156248 5,191,511.30 99.832426 -30,174.90 Subtotal 1.262253 5,170,000.00 5,161,336.40 26,483.31 0.00 Inv Type: 12 TREASURY NOTES 09/19/2019 2.460224 4,938,575.00 98.887017 IDC-FIS 0.00 84942 CCCSD GOV US TREASU 912796SJ9 03/21/2019 2.430000 5,000,000.00 4,944,350.87 3,712.50 2,063.37 84954 GOV US TREASURY BIL 912796RD3 03/27/2019 2.390000 30,000,000.00 29,996,400.00 9,958.33 2,375.00 04/04/2019 2.391270 29,984,066.67 99.988000 IDC-FIS 0.00 2.431890 122,334,290.55 99.767468 0.00 Subtotal 2.413762 123,310,000.00 123,023,264.95 666,129.06 22,845.34 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 8 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 82119 WT GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0ZG1 09/12/2014 1.750000 166,000.00 165,467.14 153.32 569.38 Inv Type: 23 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSO 08/21/2020 2.706385 19,968,840.00 100.291000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84637 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130AF2D8 10/01/2018 2.860000 20,000,000.00 20,132,200.00 286,000.00 140,640.00 10/15/2020 2.881030 19,991,560.00 100.661000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84489 RM FHLB NOTE 3130AEBM1 06/08/2018 2.750000 5,000,000.00 5,068,400.00 42,395.66 84,075.00 06/10/2022 2.832511 4,984,325.00 101.368000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84581 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130AEU65 08/29/2018 2.625000 20,000,000.00 20,058,200.00 58,333.33 89,360.00 09/06/2022 2.965325 4,960,695.00 101.504000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84835 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3KM5 01/16/2019 2.500000 2,000,000.00 2,015,540.00 15,555.56 24,368.00 12/09/2022 2.619519 1,996,310.89 100.777000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84712 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3130ABCV6 11/27/2018 1.690000 5,000,000.00 4,928,650.00 30,983.34 73,750.00 05/19/2021 2.912372 4,856,777.78 98.573000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84713 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3130AEV80 11/27/2018 2.750000 5,000,000.00 5,075,200.00 9,548.61 114,505.00 02/08/2021 2.375000 3,500,000.00 100.010000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84190 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3130ADME9 02/08/2018 2.375000 3,500,000.00 3,500,350.00 12,237.85 350.00 04/26/2019 2.278646 249,929.98 99.991000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84367 CLT GOV FHLB NOTES 3130AE6P0 04/26/2018 2.250000 250,000.00 249,977.50 2,421.88 47.52 12/10/2021 2.100994 4,461,124.50 98.871000 IDC-FIS -11,929.50 83924 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130ACLS1 10/11/2017 1.550000 20,000,000.00 19,989,200.00 146,388.89 0.00 04/07/2021 1.723000 5,005,108.25 98.905000 IDC-FIS -59,858.25 84066 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3130AAB49 12/08/2017 1.875000 4,500,000.00 4,449,195.00 26,015.63 0.00 10/11/2019 1.577535 19,989,200.00 99.946000 BOOK 0.00 84420 WT GOV FHLB NOTE 3130AE3Q1 05/21/2018 2.735000 165,000.00 167,149.95 2,018.20 3,192.09 84480 RM FHLB NOTE 3130AEEP1 06/08/2018 2.550000 5,000,000.00 5,025,900.00 43,562.50 46,130.00 05/28/2021 2.565000 2,498,930.00 100.518000 IDC-FIS 0.00 05/28/2021 2.692494 4,979,770.00 100.518000 IDC-FIS 0.00 05/28/2019 2.323683 4,954,650.00 99.832000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84484 CCCSD FHLB NOTE 3130ABF92 06/08/2018 1.375000 5,000,000.00 4,991,600.00 23,489.58 36,950.00 84460 RM GOV FHLB NOTE 3130AEEP1 06/01/2018 2.550000 2,500,000.00 2,512,950.00 21,781.25 14,020.00 84459 RM GOV FHLB NOTE 3130AEEQ9 06/01/2018 2.650000 2,500,000.00 2,526,900.00 24,843.75 29,217.50 04/20/2022 2.906513 163,957.86 101.303000 IDC-FIS 0.00 05/16/2022 2.675015 2,497,682.50 101.076000 IDC-FIS 0.00 Subtotal 2.036853 138,465,000.00 138,405,197.95 912,095.09 656,605.11 2.152563 138,142,913.56 99.956811 -387,304.05 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 9 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 82946 WT GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EC6Z2 02/12/2016 1.400000 155,000.00 152,583.55 644.97 0.00 08/04/2020 1.730194 170,156.40 99.209000 IDC-FIS -1,501.10 82986 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFK63 03/15/2016 1.250000 4,061,000.00 4,018,643.77 3,807.19 0.00 12/14/2020 1.320066 155,578.15 98.441000 IDC-FIS -2,994.60 82683 WT GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EE5Z9 09/11/2015 1.750000 170,000.00 168,655.30 471.04 0.00 08/05/2019 1.350014 1,005,740.00 99.709000 IDC-FIS -8,650.00 82671 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EE5S5 08/25/2015 1.500000 1,000,000.00 997,090.00 2,333.33 0.00 08/05/2019 1.350014 3,017,220.00 99.709000 IDC-FIS -25,950.00 82672 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EE5S5 08/25/2015 1.500000 3,000,000.00 2,991,270.00 7,000.00 0.00 83007 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFV20 03/30/2016 1.490000 4,000,000.00 3,961,760.00 165.56 0.00 03/04/2020 1.430176 4,032,857.27 98.957000 IDC-FIS -14,213.50 Inv Type: 27 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 84909 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0T94 03/08/2019 2.375000 5,000,000.00 5,013,450.00 23,750.00 30,965.00 01/19/2023 2.470220 4,998,648.19 100.269000 IDC-FIS 0.00 06/26/2020 1.070378 2,491,622.00 98.654000 IDC-FIS -59,800.90 83210 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3136G16D6 07/12/2016 1.350000 2,465,000.00 2,431,821.10 8,781.56 0.00 83474 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3136G04H1 12/07/2016 1.700000 4,998,000.00 4,946,220.72 32,570.30 0.00 83810 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0J20 06/29/2017 1.375000 4,000,000.00 3,929,400.00 5,347.22 0.00 11/13/2020 1.720219 4,994,151.54 98.964000 IDC-FIS -47,930.82 82436 WT GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0A78 03/16/2015 1.625000 170,000.00 168,903.50 537.15 0.00 09/12/2019 1.889799 164,897.76 99.679000 IDC-FIS 0.00 01/21/2020 1.627650 169,977.90 99.355000 IDC-FIS -1,074.40 02/05/2020 1.286438 4,020,000.00 99.163000 IDC-FIS -53,480.00 83000 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3136G1C98 03/28/2016 1.420000 4,000,000.00 3,966,520.00 8,835.56 0.00 02/26/2021 1.648008 3,961,360.00 98.235000 IDC-FIS -31,960.00 07/30/2020 2.597150 495,709.20 98.845000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84836 KFPD GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0T60 01/16/2019 1.500000 504,000.00 498,178.80 1,281.00 2,469.60 01/19/2023 2.543456 5,978,135.50 100.269000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84892 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0T94 02/28/2019 2.375000 6,000,000.00 6,016,140.00 28,500.00 53,442.00 84217 GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0S38 03/01/2018 2.000000 5,000,000.00 4,961,200.00 23,888.89 68,615.00 01/05/2022 2.590321 4,892,585.00 99.224000 IDC-FIS 0.00 01/05/2022 2.564557 4,897,635.00 99.224000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84248 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0S38 03/07/2018 2.000000 5,000,000.00 4,961,200.00 23,888.89 63,565.00 2.094177 37,064,722.09 99.344560 -194,246.12 Subtotal 1.887716 37,303,000.00 37,058,501.26 157,533.89 219,625.98 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 10 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 84547 KFPD GOV FFCB BOND 3133EJUM9 07/25/2018 2.600000 500,000.00 501,140.00 2,708.33 2,176.50 03/21/2022 2.612688 4,997,600.00 100.823000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84573 RM GOV FFCB DISC NO 3133ECWH3 08/27/2018 2.100000 296,000.00 295,745.44 966.93 654.16 07/16/2020 2.708286 498,963.50 100.228000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84289 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EJHC6 03/29/2018 2.600000 5,000,000.00 5,041,150.00 3,611.11 43,550.00 02/12/2021 2.480332 4,981,555.00 99.899000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84218 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EJCE7 03/01/2018 2.350000 5,000,000.00 4,994,950.00 15,993.06 13,395.00 02/12/2021 2.464582 4,983,855.00 99.899000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84249 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EJCE7 03/07/2018 2.350000 5,000,000.00 4,994,950.00 15,993.06 11,095.00 01/11/2021 2.648926 249,722.04 100.362000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84849 KFPD GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EJ4Q9 01/22/2019 2.550000 250,000.00 250,905.00 1,416.67 1,377.75 03/13/2020 2.545874 28,489,968.00 100.102000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84918 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EKCW4 03/13/2019 2.510000 28,500,000.00 28,529,070.00 35,767.50 39,102.00 12/11/2020 2.960000 20,000,000.00 100.073000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84636 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EJB81 09/27/2018 2.730000 18,000,000.00 18,049,500.00 8,190.00 68,670.00 08/05/2019 2.431326 295,091.28 99.914000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84775 GOV FFCB CALLABLE N 3133EJ2M0 12/11/2018 2.960000 20,000,000.00 20,014,600.00 180,888.89 14,600.00 03/25/2020 2.803194 17,980,830.00 100.275000 IDC-FIS 0.00 09/21/2020 1.110242 4,700,880.80 98.249000 IDC-FIS -93,002.70 83344 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EGUT0 09/28/2016 1.170000 4,690,000.00 4,607,878.10 1,524.26 0.00 12/12/2019 1.640327 1,988,940.00 99.370000 IDC-FIS -1,540.00 83505 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EGT88 12/16/2016 1.450000 2,000,000.00 1,987,400.00 8,780.56 0.00 07/01/2019 1.000200 9,985,200.00 99.653000 IDC-FIS -19,900.00 83160 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EGCA1 06/03/2016 1.060000 10,000,000.00 9,977,700.00 34,744.44 1,300.00 03/30/2020 1.490000 4,000,000.00 99.044000 IDC-FIS -38,240.00 83190 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EGJC0 07/01/2016 .950000 10,000,000.00 9,965,300.00 23,750.00 0.00 06/03/2019 1.140244 9,976,400.00 99.777000 IDC-FIS 0.00 83725 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EHFL2 04/26/2017 1.550000 10,000,000.00 9,910,500.00 72,333.33 0.00 07/06/2020 1.560960 9,996,800.00 99.006000 IDC-FIS -96,200.00 83813 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EHQB2 07/06/2017 1.550000 10,000,000.00 9,900,600.00 36,597.22 0.00 01/12/2022 2.455479 3,466,746.50 99.676000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84191 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EH6X6 02/08/2018 2.200000 3,500,000.00 3,488,660.00 16,897.22 21,913.50 05/30/2019 1.400388 19,968,400.00 99.831000 IDC-FIS -2,200.00 83741 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EHHN6 05/12/2017 1.350000 10,000,000.00 9,991,300.00 55,875.00 6,900.00 04/13/2020 1.578010 9,991,900.00 99.105000 IDC-FIS -81,400.00 83767 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EHLG6 05/30/2017 1.320000 20,000,000.00 19,966,200.00 88,733.33 0.00 05/02/2019 1.430437 9,984,400.00 99.913000 IDC-FIS 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 11 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 7 of 18 84732 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 2,000,000.00 1,972,333.33 17,486.67 999.99 10/18/2019 2.640944 146,538.50 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 10/18/2019 2.640944 1,953,846.67 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 10/18/2019 2.640944 146,538.50 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84733 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 150,000.00 147,925.00 1,311.50 75.00 10/18/2019 2.640944 439,615.50 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84730 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 4,800,000.00 4,733,600.00 41,968.00 2,400.00 84731 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 150,000.00 147,925.00 1,311.50 75.00 10/18/2019 2.640944 4,689,232.00 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84734 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 800,000.00 788,933.33 6,994.67 399.99 84735 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 7,100,000.00 7,001,783.33 62,077.67 3,549.99 10/18/2019 2.640944 781,538.67 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 10/18/2019 2.640944 6,936,155.67 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 10/18/2019 2.640942 195,384.67 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84736 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 200,000.00 197,233.33 1,748.67 99.99 84723 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 20,000,000.00 19,723,333.33 174,866.67 9,999.99 10/18/2019 2.640944 2,246,923.67 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84724 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 150,000.00 147,925.00 1,311.50 75.01 10/18/2019 2.640944 19,538,466.67 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84721 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 250,000.00 246,541.67 2,185.83 125.01 84729 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 450,000.00 443,775.00 3,934.50 225.00 84722 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 2,300,000.00 2,268,183.33 20,109.67 1,149.99 10/18/2019 2.640946 244,230.83 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 10/18/2019 2.640952 146,538.49 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 10/18/2019 2.640944 293,077.00 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84727 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 300,000.00 295,850.00 2,623.00 150.00 10/18/2019 2.640944 4,005,385.67 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84728 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 4,100,000.00 4,043,283.33 35,847.67 2,049.99 10/18/2019 2.640946 244,230.83 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84725 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 250,000.00 246,541.67 2,185.83 125.01 10/18/2019 2.640945 390,769.33 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84726 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 400,000.00 394,466.67 3,497.33 200.01 Inv Type: 28 FHLMC DISCOUNT NOTES Subtotal 1.962089 175,122,000.00 174,757,551.16 619,193.00 224,733.91 2.013477 174,918,803.94 99.791889 -385,791.90 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 12 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 84749 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 350,000.00 345,158.33 3,060.17 174.99 10/18/2019 2.640944 146,538.50 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84756 CCCSD GOV FHLMC DIS 313396GK3 12/06/2018 2.500000 5,000,000.00 4,978,912.50 40,277.78 787.50 10/18/2019 2.640943 341,923.17 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84747 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 1,300,000.00 1,282,016.67 11,366.33 650.01 10/18/2019 2.640944 293,077.00 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84748 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 150,000.00 147,925.00 1,311.50 75.00 10/18/2019 2.640944 1,270,000.33 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 06/03/2019 2.531468 4,937,847.22 99.578250 IDC-FIS 0.00 07/23/2019 2.443157 4,952,608.33 99.240389 IDC-FIS 0.00 84899 CCCSD GOV FHLMC DIS 313396JM6 03/04/2019 2.420000 5,000,000.00 4,962,019.44 9,411.11 0.00 06/12/2019 2.425916 4,967,197.22 99.518000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84905 CCCSD GOV FHLMC DIS 313396GU1 03/06/2019 2.410000 5,000,000.00 4,975,900.00 8,702.78 0.00 09/18/2019 2.591191 980,244.44 98.833611 IDC-FIS 0.00 84789 PW GOV FHLMC DISCOU 313396LW1 12/12/2018 2.540000 1,000,000.00 988,336.11 7,761.11 330.56 06/19/2019 2.502103 9,871,697.22 99.471139 IDC-FIS 0.00 84809 LUHSD GOV FHLMC DIS 313396HB2 12/14/2018 2.470000 10,000,000.00 9,947,113.89 74,100.00 1,316.67 84746 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 300,000.00 295,850.00 2,623.00 150.00 84740 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 400,000.00 394,466.67 3,497.33 200.01 10/18/2019 2.640945 683,846.33 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84741 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 350,000.00 345,158.33 3,060.17 174.99 10/18/2019 2.640945 390,769.33 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84739 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 700,000.00 690,316.67 6,120.33 350.01 10/18/2019 2.640944 1,953,846.67 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84737 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 2,000,000.00 1,972,333.33 17,486.67 999.99 10/18/2019 2.640944 586,154.00 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84738 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 600,000.00 591,700.00 5,246.00 300.00 10/18/2019 2.640944 1,074,615.67 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84744 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 1,100,000.00 1,084,783.33 9,617.67 549.99 10/18/2019 2.640945 830,384.83 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84745 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 850,000.00 838,241.67 7,431.83 425.01 10/18/2019 2.640943 488,461.67 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84742 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 1,200,000.00 1,183,400.00 10,492.00 600.00 10/18/2019 2.640943 341,923.17 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84743 PW GOV FHLMC NOTES 313396NC3 11/30/2018 2.580000 500,000.00 493,083.33 4,371.67 249.99 10/18/2019 2.640944 1,172,308.00 98.616667 IDC-FIS 0.00 Subtotal 2.539360 79,200,000.00 78,316,348.59 605,398.13 29,034.69 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 13 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 12/02/2019 2.624958 499,329.71 98.298611 IDC-FIS 0.00 84816 CCCSD GOV FHLB DISC 313384DV8 12/21/2018 2.425000 5,000,000.00 4,999,669.44 34,017.36 6.25 04/02/2019 2.441777 4,965,645.83 99.993389 IDC-FIS 0.00 84777 GOV FHLB DISC 313384FK0 12/11/2018 2.430000 30,000,000.00 29,922,650.00 224,775.00 1,625.00 05/10/2019 2.454855 29,696,250.00 99.742167 IDC-FIS 0.00 84812 PW GOV FHLB DISC 313384PZ6 12/19/2018 2.560000 512,000.00 503,288.89 3,750.11 209.07 84821 CCCSD GOV FHLB DISC 313384JL4 12/24/2018 2.490000 5,000,000.00 4,962,355.56 33,891.67 1,088.89 Inv Type: 43 FHLB DISCOUNT NOTES 84250 WT GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134GBA69 03/07/2018 2.375000 158,000.00 158,513.50 542.03 2,502.25 11/22/2022 2.350000 10,000,000.00 99.519000 IDC-FIS -48,100.00 83979 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134GBW81 11/22/2017 2.350000 10,000,000.00 9,951,900.00 84,208.33 0.00 04/15/2019 2.250071 248,336.89 99.948000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84379 RM GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADZ9 04/30/2018 1.125000 251,000.00 250,869.48 1,302.06 2,532.59 08/09/2022 2.678470 156,011.25 100.325000 IDC-FIS 0.00 07/15/2020 1.567587 3,992,000.00 98.844000 IDC-FIS -38,240.00 10/02/2019 1.330187 249,280.00 99.393000 IDC-FIS -797.50 82927 KFPD GOV FHLMC NOTE 3137EADM8 01/25/2016 1.250000 250,000.00 248,482.50 1,553.82 0.00 09/30/2019 1.350000 10,000,000.00 99.442000 IDC-FIS -55,800.00 83006 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134G8PD5 03/30/2016 1.350000 10,000,000.00 9,944,200.00 375.00 0.00 05/30/2019 1.379985 3,043,140.00 99.889000 IDC-FIS -46,470.00 82571 RM GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADG1 05/27/2015 1.750000 3,000,000.00 2,996,670.00 17,645.83 0.00 10/02/2019 1.310124 5,986,200.00 99.393000 IDC-FIS -22,620.00 82762 RM GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADM8 10/26/2015 1.250000 6,000,000.00 5,963,580.00 37,291.67 0.00 83039 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134G8W21 04/08/2016 1.375000 5,000,000.00 4,958,750.00 17,378.49 0.00 83172 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134G9QW0 06/14/2016 1.280000 10,000,000.00 9,976,500.00 38,044.44 0.00 06/14/2019 1.280000 10,000,000.00 99.765000 IDC-FIS -23,500.00 08/12/2021 1.250127 171,979.30 97.283000 IDC-FIS -3,679.71 83345 WLT GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EAEC9 09/28/2016 1.125000 173,000.00 168,299.59 264.91 0.00 83809 RM GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134GBTQ5 06/29/2017 1.500000 4,000,000.00 3,953,760.00 12,666.66 0.00 12/30/2019 1.375000 5,000,000.00 99.175000 IDC-FIS -41,250.00 Subtotal 1.568700 48,832,000.00 48,571,525.07 211,273.24 5,034.84 1.566079 48,846,947.44 99.466590 -280,457.21 Inv Type: 29 FHLMC NOTES 2.589354 77,681,915.77 98.884279 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 14 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 84694 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233HSE5 11/15/2018 2.740000 800,000.00 797,649.33 8,341.78 267.55 05/01/2019 2.603454 1,480,725.00 99.795000 IDC-FIS 0.00 05/14/2019 2.778059 789,040.00 99.706167 IDC-FIS 0.00 04/12/2019 2.737615 29,697,383.33 99.924833 IDC-FIS 0.00 84714 CP CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533URC9 11/29/2018 2.710000 30,000,000.00 29,977,450.00 277,775.00 2,291.67 04/01/2019 2.603643 29,612,358.33 100.000000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84639 CP JP MORGAN SECURI 46640QR11 10/02/2018 2.570000 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.00 387,641.67 0.00 84660 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233HRJ5 10/22/2018 2.610000 800,000.00 799,070.67 9,338.00 56.67 84681 PW CP MUFG UNION BA 62478YS17 11/02/2018 2.570000 1,500,000.00 1,496,925.00 16,062.50 137.50 04/18/2019 2.644122 789,676.00 99.883833 IDC-FIS 0.00 84716 CP TORONTO DOMINION 89119BRA6 11/28/2018 2.680000 30,000,000.00 29,981,550.00 276,933.33 1,650.00 84720 CP JP MORGAN SECURI 46640QRR4 11/30/2018 2.820000 30,000,000.00 29,950,800.00 286,700.00 7,200.00 04/10/2019 2.706800 29,702,966.67 99.938500 IDC-FIS 0.00 04/25/2019 2.852625 29,656,900.00 99.836000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84758 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233HT38 12/06/2018 2.820000 4,300,000.00 4,280,886.50 39,072.67 2,107.00 06/21/2019 2.755805 29,392,500.00 99.428500 IDC-FIS 0.00 84627 CP JP MORGAN SECURI 46640QTM3 09/24/2018 2.700000 30,000,000.00 29,828,550.00 425,250.00 10,800.00 Inv Type: 71 COMMERCIAL PAPER DISCOUNT 84931 CCCSD GOV FHLB DISC 313384JM2 03/22/2019 2.410000 5,000,000.00 4,962,019.44 3,347.22 0.00 05/03/2019 2.426406 29,797,158.33 99.788444 IDC-FIS 0.00 84940 AUHSD GOV FHLB DISC 313384TU3 03/21/2019 2.400000 377,000.00 368,766.32 276.47 211.12 07/23/2019 2.430009 4,958,829.17 99.240389 IDC-FIS -156.95 84822 CCCSD GOV FHLB DISC 313384JM2 12/24/2018 2.490000 5,000,000.00 4,962,019.44 33,891.67 1,098.60 07/22/2019 2.526700 4,927,375.00 99.247111 IDC-FIS 0.00 84848 GOV FHLB DISC 313384FC8 01/22/2019 2.410000 30,000,000.00 29,936,533.33 138,575.00 800.00 07/23/2019 2.526878 4,927,029.17 99.240389 IDC-FIS 0.00 05/28/2019 2.431113 29,862,866.67 99.623167 IDC-FIS 0.00 84950 GOV FHLB DISC 313384EV7 03/22/2019 2.415000 30,000,000.00 29,950,416.67 20,125.00 729.17 04/26/2019 2.420684 29,929,562.50 99.834722 IDC-FIS 0.00 84945 GOV FHLB DISC NOTE 313384GD5 03/21/2019 2.420000 30,000,000.00 29,886,950.00 22,183.33 1,900.00 03/02/2020 2.456836 368,278.73 97.816000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84941 AUHSD GOV FHLB DISC 313384TU3 03/21/2019 2.400000 6,959,000.00 6,807,015.44 5,103.27 3,897.03 03/02/2020 2.456835 6,798,015.14 97.816000 IDC-FIS 0.00 2.441500 146,730,340.25 99.603434 -156.95 Subtotal 2.423005 147,848,000.00 147,261,684.53 519,936.10 11,565.13 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 15 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 84900 CP BNP PARIBAS NY 09659CT57 03/01/2019 2.510000 30,000,000.00 29,862,416.67 64,841.67 0.00 08/14/2019 2.582932 493,625.00 99.002500 IDC-FIS -206.25 06/05/2019 2.526913 29,799,200.00 99.541389 IDC-FIS -1,625.00 06/03/2019 2.516427 29,804,166.67 99.555500 IDC-FIS -2,100.00 84901 CP BNP PARIBAS NY 09659CT32 03/01/2019 2.500000 30,000,000.00 29,866,650.00 64,583.33 0.00 84878 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233HVE1 02/15/2019 2.550000 500,000.00 495,012.50 1,593.75 0.00 84853 CP SOCIETE GENERALE 83369CRN6 01/29/2019 2.530000 30,000,000.00 29,956,950.00 130,716.67 1,225.00 04/22/2019 2.544844 29,825,008.33 99.856500 IDC-FIS 0.00 05/06/2019 2.567642 29,793,875.00 99.760833 IDC-FIS 0.00 84854 CP NORDEA BANK 65558KS62 01/29/2019 2.550000 30,000,000.00 29,928,250.00 131,750.00 2,625.00 06/03/2019 2.495472 7,752,633.80 99.555500 IDC-FIS -819.10 06/03/2019 2.495472 2,485,493.80 99.555500 IDC-FIS -262.60 84902 HR CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233HT38 03/05/2019 2.480000 2,501,000.00 2,489,883.06 4,651.86 0.00 84903 HR CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233HT38 03/05/2019 2.480000 1,644,000.00 1,636,692.42 3,057.84 0.00 84904 HR CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233HT38 03/05/2019 2.480000 7,801,000.00 7,766,324.56 14,509.86 0.00 06/03/2019 2.495472 1,633,807.20 99.555500 IDC-FIS -172.62 84767 CP SOCIETE GENERALE 83369CRA4 12/07/2018 2.730000 30,000,000.00 29,981,550.00 261,625.00 2,025.00 06/03/2019 2.860106 985,978.32 99.555500 IDC-FIS 0.00 04/10/2019 2.755915 29,717,900.00 99.938500 IDC-FIS 0.00 04/08/2019 2.755493 29,722,450.00 99.952167 IDC-FIS 0.00 84768 CP SOCIETE GENERALE 83369CR89 12/07/2018 2.730000 30,000,000.00 29,985,650.00 261,625.00 1,575.00 06/03/2019 2.860104 4,239,706.83 99.555500 IDC-FIS 0.00 05/17/2019 2.641531 29,755,466.67 99.685667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84759 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233HT38 12/06/2018 2.820000 1,100,000.00 1,095,110.50 9,995.34 539.00 84760 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233HT38 12/06/2018 2.820000 1,000,000.00 995,555.00 9,086.68 490.00 06/03/2019 2.860105 1,084,576.16 99.555500 IDC-FIS 0.00 84773 CP CREDIT SUISSE NY 2254EBRA1 12/10/2018 2.770000 30,000,000.00 29,981,550.00 258,533.33 2,325.00 05/01/2019 2.700911 29,767,733.33 99.795000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84838 CP MUFG BANK LTD NY 62479MS12 01/17/2019 2.680000 30,000,000.00 29,938,500.00 165,266.67 5,500.00 84839 CP MUFG BANK LTD NY 62479MRV7 01/17/2019 2.680000 30,000,000.00 29,942,600.00 165,266.67 5,133.33 84851 CP CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533USH7 01/25/2019 2.620000 30,000,000.00 29,905,700.00 144,100.00 6,133.33 04/29/2019 2.700506 29,772,200.00 99.808667 IDC-FIS 0.00 84776 CP CREDIT SUISSE NY 2254EBRF0 12/11/2018 2.770000 30,000,000.00 29,971,300.00 256,225.00 3,616.67 04/10/2019 2.796032 29,720,691.67 99.938500 IDC-FIS 0.00 04/15/2019 2.796901 29,711,458.33 99.904333 IDC-FIS 0.00 04/26/2019 2.789081 29,687,200.00 99.829167 IDC-FIS 0.00 84779 CP STANDARD CHARTER 85324URS4 12/11/2018 2.760000 30,000,000.00 29,948,750.00 255,300.00 6,250.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 16 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 06/28/2019 2.517306 29,793,750.00 99.379111 IDC-FIS -2,933.34 84944 CP TOYOTA MOTOR CRE 89233HTU8 03/21/2019 2.500000 30,000,000.00 29,813,733.33 22,916.67 0.00 06/20/2019 2.505772 29,811,175.00 99.435556 IDC-FIS -3,333.33 84946 CP SOCIETE GENERALE 83369CTL8 03/21/2019 2.490000 30,000,000.00 29,830,666.67 22,825.00 0.00 06/21/2019 2.455310 29,812,933.33 99.428500 IDC-FIS -6,750.00 84939 CP TORONTO DOMINION 89119BRN8 03/22/2019 2.490000 30,000,000.00 29,956,950.00 20,750.00 525.00 06/24/2019 2.466112 29,804,000.00 99.407333 IDC-FIS -6,300.00 84943 CP PRUDENTIAL PLC 7443M3TM6 03/21/2019 2.440000 30,000,000.00 29,828,550.00 22,366.67 0.00 04/22/2019 2.495350 29,935,675.00 99.856500 IDC-FIS 0.00 84947 CP TORONTO DOMINION 89119BTR7 03/25/2019 2.500000 30,000,000.00 29,820,083.33 14,583.33 0.00 84951 CP SOCIETY GENERALE 83369CTS3 03/26/2019 2.490000 25,000,000.00 24,848,305.56 10,375.00 0.00 04/24/2019 2.394758 541,918.53 99.842833 IDC-FIS -24.28 84948 CP NORDEA BANK 65558KTR5 03/25/2019 2.495000 25,000,000.00 24,850,069.44 12,128.47 0.00 06/25/2019 2.516075 29,808,333.33 99.400278 IDC-FIS -2,833.33 84949 PW CP MUFG BANK LTD 62479MRQ8 03/25/2019 2.390000 543,000.00 542,146.59 252.34 0.00 06/25/2019 2.511011 24,840,597.22 99.400278 IDC-FIS -2,656.25 84930 CP EXXON MOBIL CORP 30229BTQ0 03/20/2019 2.450000 30,000,000.00 29,822,200.00 24,500.00 0.00 84913 CP BNP PARIBAS NY 09659CUB2 03/08/2019 2.530000 25,000,000.00 24,820,444.44 42,166.67 0.00 06/05/2019 2.515723 29,812,500.00 99.541389 IDC-FIS -2,166.66 07/11/2019 2.552422 24,780,381.94 99.281778 IDC-FIS -2,104.17 06/11/2019 2.505946 24,840,916.67 99.499056 IDC-FIS -2,465.28 84914 CP TMCC 89233HTB0 03/11/2019 2.490000 25,000,000.00 24,874,763.89 36,312.50 0.00 06/06/2019 2.516075 29,808,333.33 99.534333 IDC-FIS -2,200.00 84907 CP BNP PARIBAS NY 09659CT65 03/06/2019 2.500000 30,000,000.00 29,860,300.00 54,166.67 0.00 84911 CP BNP PARIBAS NY 09659CUA4 03/08/2019 2.530000 25,000,000.00 24,822,222.22 42,166.67 0.00 84912 CP BNP PARIBAS NY 09659CT57 03/07/2019 2.500000 30,000,000.00 29,862,416.67 52,083.33 0.00 07/10/2019 2.552241 24,782,138.89 99.288889 IDC-FIS -2,083.34 84924 CP TORONTO DOMINION 89119BTQ9 03/19/2019 2.510000 30,000,000.00 29,822,200.00 27,191.67 0.00 06/21/2019 2.527446 19,861,950.00 99.428500 IDC-FIS -1,350.00 06/24/2019 2.527091 29,797,108.33 99.407333 IDC-FIS -2,100.00 06/26/2019 2.522199 24,829,520.83 99.393222 IDC-FIS -2,090.27 84928 CP TORONTO DOMINION 89119BTS5 03/20/2019 2.505000 25,000,000.00 24,848,305.56 20,875.00 0.00 06/10/2019 2.525672 29,813,841.67 99.506111 IDC-FIS -1,750.01 84916 CP MUFG UNION BANK 62478YTA6 03/13/2019 2.510000 30,000,000.00 29,851,833.33 39,741.67 0.00 84920 CP CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533UTB9 03/14/2019 2.460000 25,000,000.00 24,874,763.89 30,750.00 0.00 84921 CP TOYOTA MOTOR CRE 89233HTM6 03/14/2019 2.510000 20,000,000.00 19,885,700.00 25,100.00 0.00 06/11/2019 2.475052 24,847,958.33 99.499056 IDC-FIS -3,944.44 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 17 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 84762 YCD BANK OF MONTREA 06370RQE2 12/06/2018 2.780000 30,000,000.00 30,003,747.67 268,733.33 3,747.67 04/12/2019 2.780000 30,000,000.00 100.013615 IDC-FIS 0.00 04/11/2019 2.780000 30,000,000.00 100.012492 IDC-FIS 0.00 04/12/2019 2.780000 30,000,000.00 100.013627 IDC-FIS 0.00 84763 YCD BANK OF MONTREA 06370RQC6 12/06/2018 2.780000 30,000,000.00 30,004,088.10 268,733.33 4,088.10 04/11/2019 2.790000 25,000,000.00 100.012784 IDC-FIS 0.00 84751 YCD STANDARD CHARTE 85325TV51 12/04/2018 2.790000 25,000,000.00 25,003,196.04 228,625.00 3,196.04 84752 YCD BANK OF MONTREA 06370RPU7 12/04/2018 2.780000 25,000,000.00 25,003,120.29 227,805.56 3,120.29 84753 YCD BANK OF MONTREA 06370RPT0 12/04/2018 2.780000 30,000,000.00 30,004,084.48 273,366.67 4,084.48 04/11/2019 2.780000 25,000,000.00 100.012481 IDC-FIS 0.00 84764 YCD MUFG BANK LTD N 55379WTL0 12/06/2018 2.770000 30,000,000.00 30,003,656.76 267,766.67 3,656.76 84765 YCD MUFG BANK LTD N 55379WTN6 12/06/2018 2.770000 30,000,000.00 30,003,988.93 267,766.67 3,988.93 04/11/2019 2.770000 30,000,000.00 100.012189 IDC-FIS 0.00 04/12/2019 2.770000 30,000,000.00 100.013296 IDC-FIS 0.00 84771 YCD NORDEA BANK 65558TBT1 12/10/2018 2.770000 30,000,000.00 30,004,994.22 258,533.33 4,994.22 04/18/2019 2.340000 120,000.00 99.996869 IDC-FIS -3.76 84492 AUHSD NCD MUFG UNIO 62478TG94 06/14/2018 2.400000 410,000.00 410,001.71 7,954.00 1.71 05/03/2019 2.400000 410,000.00 100.000418 IDC-FIS 0.00 84361 AUHSD NCD UNION BAN 62478TD55 04/20/2018 2.340000 120,000.00 119,996.24 2,698.80 0.00 04/12/2019 2.790000 30,000,000.00 100.013945 IDC-FIS 0.00 84353 AUHSD NCD UNION BAN 62478TD55 04/20/2018 2.340000 1,500,000.00 1,499,953.03 33,735.00 0.00 04/18/2019 2.340000 1,500,000.00 99.996869 IDC-FIS -46.97 84718 YCD CREDIT AGRICOLE 22535CAS0 11/30/2018 2.760000 30,000,000.00 30,003,878.96 280,600.00 3,878.96 04/12/2019 2.760000 30,000,000.00 100.012930 IDC-FIS 0.00 84750 YCD STANDARD CHARTE 85325TV44 12/04/2018 2.790000 30,000,000.00 30,004,183.64 274,350.00 4,183.64 04/03/2019 2.730000 30,000,000.00 100.002983 IDC-FIS 0.00 84682 PW NCD MUFG UNION B 62478TQ28 11/02/2018 2.810000 1,610,000.00 1,612,181.59 18,850.42 2,181.59 11/01/2019 2.810000 1,610,000.00 100.135502 IDC-FIS 0.00 84715 YCD NORDEA BANK 65558TBJ3 11/28/2018 2.730000 30,000,000.00 30,000,895.03 282,100.00 895.03 Inv Type: 72 NEGOTIABLE CERT OF DEPOSIT 84956 CP SOCIETE GENERALE 83369CTS3 03/28/2019 2.480000 30,000,000.00 29,817,966.67 8,266.67 0.00 06/26/2019 2.495472 29,814,000.00 99.393222 IDC-FIS -4,300.00 06/26/2019 2.505946 24,840,916.67 99.393222 IDC-FIS -2,986.11 2.598994 1,049,052,669.51 99.624199 -59,556.38 Subtotal 2.578048 1,057,489,000.00 1,053,514,947.80 4,459,361.95 62,472.72 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 18 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 04/22/2019 2.480000 2,200,000.00 100.007844 IDC-FIS 0.00 84936 SO YCD TORONTO DOMI 89114MYU5 03/22/2019 2.480000 2,200,000.00 2,200,172.57 1,515.56 172.57 04/22/2019 2.480000 10,000,000.00 100.007844 IDC-FIS 0.00 84937 SO YCD TORONTO DOMI 89114MYU5 03/22/2019 2.480000 10,000,000.00 10,000,784.41 6,888.89 784.41 04/22/2019 2.480000 2,700,000.00 100.007844 IDC-FIS 0.00 84934 SO YCD TORONTO DOMI 89114MYU5 03/22/2019 2.480000 2,700,000.00 2,700,211.79 1,860.00 211.79 04/22/2019 2.480000 800,000.00 100.007844 IDC-FIS 0.00 84935 SO YCD TORONTO DOMI 89114MYU5 03/22/2019 2.480000 800,000.00 800,062.75 551.11 62.75 07/25/2019 2.590000 30,000,000.00 100.038134 IDC-FIS 0.00 84953 YCD STANDARD CHARTE 85325T3B9 03/27/2019 2.590000 30,000,000.00 30,011,440.24 10,791.67 11,440.24 06/27/2019 2.500000 30,000,000.00 100.036338 IDC-FIS 0.00 84955 YCD NORDEA BANK NY 65558TFY6 03/28/2019 2.500000 30,000,000.00 30,010,901.47 8,333.33 10,901.47 04/22/2019 2.480000 3,300,000.00 100.007844 IDC-FIS 0.00 84938 SO YCD TORONTO DOMI 89114MYU5 03/22/2019 2.480000 3,300,000.00 3,300,258.86 2,273.33 258.86 07/24/2019 2.590000 25,000,000.00 100.037752 IDC-FIS 0.00 84952 YCD STANDARD CHARTE 85325T3C7 03/26/2019 2.590000 25,000,000.00 25,009,437.91 10,791.67 9,437.91 04/18/2019 2.470000 30,000,000.00 100.005574 IDC-FIS 0.00 84867 YCD TORONTO DOMINIO 89114MUG0 02/07/2019 2.470000 30,000,000.00 30,001,672.27 109,091.67 1,672.27 05/28/2019 2.580000 30,000,000.00 100.035537 IDC-FIS 0.00 84869 NCD MUFG UNION BANK 62478TV22 02/08/2019 2.580000 30,000,000.00 30,010,661.16 111,800.00 10,661.16 05/14/2019 2.650000 30,000,000.00 100.035191 IDC-FIS 0.00 84772 YCD MUFG BK 55379WTT3 12/10/2018 2.770000 30,000,000.00 30,004,994.22 258,533.33 4,994.22 04/15/2019 2.770000 30,000,000.00 100.016647 IDC-FIS 0.00 84852 YCD CREDIT AGRICOLE 22535CCG4 01/25/2019 2.650000 30,000,000.00 30,010,557.39 145,750.00 10,557.39 04/15/2019 2.770000 30,000,000.00 100.016647 IDC-FIS 0.00 84870 YCD NORDEA BANK 65558TDW2 02/08/2019 2.530000 30,000,000.00 30,007,693.85 109,633.33 7,693.85 04/22/2019 2.480000 3,300,000.00 100.007844 IDC-FIS 0.00 84917 YCD TORONTO DOMINIO 89114MXD4 03/13/2019 2.530000 30,000,000.00 30,012,470.24 40,058.33 12,470.24 06/24/2019 2.530000 30,000,000.00 100.041567 IDC-FIS 0.00 84933 SO YCD TORONTO DOMI 89114MYU5 03/22/2019 2.480000 3,300,000.00 3,300,258.86 2,273.33 258.86 05/31/2019 2.530000 30,000,000.00 100.029487 IDC-FIS 0.00 84886 YCD NORDEA BANK NY 65558TEH4 02/21/2019 2.540000 25,000,000.00 25,007,497.70 68,791.67 7,497.70 05/24/2019 2.530000 30,000,000.00 100.025646 IDC-FIS 0.00 84896 YCD NORDEA BANK NY 65558TEV3 02/27/2019 2.530000 30,000,000.00 30,008,846.13 69,575.00 8,846.13 05/29/2019 2.540000 25,000,000.00 100.029991 IDC-FIS 0.00 Subtotal 2.664659 665,940,000.00 666,079,888.51 3,920,131.00 139,939.24 2.664659 665,940,000.00 100.021006 -50.73 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 19 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 84508 CORP APPLE INC 037833BS8 06/26/2018 2.250000 20,000,000.00 19,928,000.00 47,500.00 248,600.00 10/09/2019 2.615073 4,945,460.00 99.507000 IDC-FIS 0.00 02/23/2021 2.880031 19,679,400.00 99.640000 IDC-FIS 0.00 12/29/2020 3.100913 7,985,652.00 95.685000 IDC-FIS -139,482.00 84528 CORP TOYOTA MOTOR C 89236TDZ5 07/03/2018 2.000000 8,200,000.00 7,846,170.00 911.11 0.00 11/03/2020 2.699874 7,865,520.00 99.335000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84499 CORP WALMART INC 931142DY6 06/22/2018 1.750000 15,000,000.00 14,926,050.00 125,416.67 90,705.00 84504 CORP WALMART INC 931142DY6 06/25/2018 1.750000 5,000,000.00 4,975,350.00 41,805.56 29,890.00 10/09/2019 2.615066 14,835,345.00 99.507000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84549 CORP WELLS FARGO BA 94988J5D5 07/18/2018 1.750000 10,000,000.00 9,987,800.00 61,736.11 65,200.00 84622 CORP APPLE INC 037833BS8 09/20/2018 2.250000 10,000,000.00 9,964,000.00 23,750.00 133,680.00 84590 CORP JOHNSON AND JO 478160CD4 09/05/2018 2.250000 10,284,000.00 10,234,945.32 17,997.00 152,511.72 05/24/2019 2.675824 9,922,600.00 99.878000 IDC-FIS 0.00 03/03/2022 2.844617 10,082,433.60 99.523000 IDC-FIS 0.00 03/03/2022 2.867054 9,796,500.00 99.523000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84596 CORP JOHNSON AND JO 478160CD4 09/07/2018 2.250000 10,000,000.00 9,952,300.00 17,500.00 155,800.00 07/29/2019 1.500000 5,000,000.00 99.636000 IDC-FIS -18,200.00 83273 CORP ROYAL BANK OF 78012KRK5 07/29/2016 1.500000 5,000,000.00 4,981,800.00 12,916.67 0.00 02/06/2020 1.850000 10,000,000.00 99.408000 IDC-FIS -59,200.00 83592 CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918BV5 02/06/2017 1.850000 10,000,000.00 9,940,800.00 28,263.89 0.00 05/16/2019 1.657877 4,986,000.00 99.857000 IDC-FIS 0.00 82975 CORP WELLS FARGO &949746RS2 03/07/2016 2.500000 5,000,000.00 4,975,750.00 9,375.00 0.00 84387 MICROSOFT CORP 594918BG8 05/03/2018 2.000000 8,000,000.00 7,946,800.00 65,777.78 81,280.00 83151 CORP CHEVRON 166764BH2 05/26/2016 1.561000 5,000,000.00 4,992,850.00 29,268.75 6,850.00 03/04/2021 2.543964 4,989,750.00 99.515000 IDC-FIS -14,000.00 83732 CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918BP8 05/04/2017 1.550000 8,549,000.00 8,344,764.39 19,508.34 0.00 11/10/2020 2.295016 16,695,991.00 99.242000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84189 CORP JOHNSON & JOHN 478160CH5 02/12/2018 1.950000 16,850,000.00 16,722,277.00 128,691.88 26,286.00 02/12/2022 3.081219 9,748,700.00 100.035000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84370 CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918BA1 04/26/2018 2.375000 10,000,000.00 10,003,500.00 32,326.39 254,800.00 01/15/2020 2.469417 9,986,900.00 99.763000 IDC-FIS -10,600.00 83742 CORP APPLE INC 037833CS7 05/12/2017 1.800000 10,000,000.00 9,922,200.00 70,000.00 0.00 08/08/2021 2.010124 8,389,048.21 97.611000 IDC-FIS -44,283.82 84184 CORP WELLS FARGO BA 94988J5L7 02/06/2018 2.400000 10,000,000.00 9,976,300.00 50,666.67 0.00 05/11/2020 1.829955 9,991,300.00 99.222000 IDC-FIS -69,100.00 Inv Type: 75 CORPORATE NOTES Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 20 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 05/24/2020 .400000 3,397.22 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 83754 CCCCD CD BERTA KAMM 121101042 05/24/2017 .400000 3,397.22 3,397.22 25.55 0.00 Subtotal .400000 3,397.22 3,397.22 25.55 0.00 .400000 3,397.22 100.000000 0.00 Inv Type: 1000 TD WITH CALC CODE OF CSC-00 04/01/2019 .000000 0.00 .000000 BOOK 0.00 83381 AUHSD MM DREYFUS TR X9USDDRE0 08/08/2016 .000000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .000000 0.00 .000000 0.00 Subtotal .000000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Inv Type: 99 MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS 84922 CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918BN3 03/08/2019 1.100000 9,854,000.00 9,803,153.36 15,958.00 7,341.23 02/06/2022 2.689934 14,896,450.00 99.857000 IDC-FIS 0.00 08/08/2019 2.529820 9,804,844.96 99.484000 IDC-FIS 0.00 03/12/2020 2.549412 19,945,465.56 99.555000 IDC-FIS -14,160.00 84957 CORP TOYOTA MOTOR C 89236TCF0 03/29/2019 2.150000 20,000,000.00 19,911,000.00 22,694.45 0.00 84889 CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918BW3 02/25/2019 2.400000 15,000,000.00 14,978,550.00 55,000.00 101,100.00 03/01/2021 3.142000 12,374,185.60 99.546000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84677 CORP ORACLE CORP 68389XAX3 11/01/2018 2.250000 20,000,000.00 19,957,400.00 216,250.00 63,240.00 10/08/2019 2.826041 19,922,910.00 99.787000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84649 CORP EXXON MOBIL CO 30231GAV4 10/11/2018 2.222000 12,640,000.00 12,582,614.40 23,405.07 208,428.80 02/23/2021 2.980040 9,830,320.00 99.640000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84646 CORP WALMART INC 931142DY6 10/09/2018 1.750000 20,000,000.00 19,901,400.00 167,222.22 91,300.00 10/09/2019 2.718905 19,810,100.00 99.507000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84761 CORP APPLE INC 037833AR1 12/06/2018 2.850000 15,000,000.00 15,098,850.00 172,187.50 196,110.00 84865 CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918BV5 02/06/2019 1.850000 15,074,000.00 14,984,761.92 42,604.99 15,978.44 10/09/2019 2.624925 15,522,179.78 99.507000 IDC-FIS 0.00 05/06/2021 3.130008 14,938,365.00 100.659000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84857 CORP WALMART INC 931142DY6 01/31/2019 1.750000 15,530,000.00 15,453,437.10 129,848.05 15,809.54 02/06/2020 2.561438 14,968,783.48 99.408000 IDC-FIS 0.00 Subtotal 2.037054 319,981,000.00 318,292,823.49 1,628,582.10 1,944,910.73 2.627694 316,914,204.19 99.472414 -369,025.82 Grand Total Count 259 2.399642 3,126,042,397.22 3,116,881,284.16 15,059,472.39 3,837,916.54 2.495073 3,108,334,180.03 99.706942 -1,823,797.39 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 21 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/30/2019 03:36:02 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 SUPRANATIONAL 327,379.00 325,512.46 326,434.82 100.28 %404.12 2.32 % MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 %0.00 0.00 % TIME DEPOSIT 3.40 3.40 3.40 100.00 %0.00 0.40 % CORPORATE NOTES 319,981.00 316,914.20 318,292.82 100.44 %1,575.88 2.63 % NCD/YCD 665,940.00 665,940.00 666,079.89 100.02 %139.89 2.66 % COMMERCIAL PAPER 1,057,489.00 1,049,052.67 1,053,514.95 100.43 %2.92 2.60 % U.S. AGENCIES 626,770.00 623,385.64 624,370.81 100.16 %-101.36 2.19 % U.S. TREASURIES 128,480.00 127,525.80 128,184.60 100.52 %-7.33 2.38 % Totals(000's)3,126,042.40 3,108,334.18 3,116,881.28 100.27 %2,014.12 2.50 % Assets (000's)Current Par Current Book Market MKT/Book Un Gain/Loss Yield Asset Allocation Page 22 Page 23 SECTION III APPENDIX B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL – MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED PARTIES B.1. PFM Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 83425 CCCCD GOV US TREAS 912828WY2 11/23/2016 2.250000 25,000.00 24,987.25 93.23 0.00 05/31/2020 1.001277 1,814,053.13 98.824000 IDC-FIS -45,103.53 07/31/2021 1.775275 25,342.78 99.949000 IDC-FIS -355.53 08/31/2021 1.921700 365,916.79 99.371000 IDC-FIS -3,212.64 83469 CCCCD GOV US TREAS 912828D72 12/05/2016 2.000000 365,000.00 362,704.15 634.78 0.00 04/30/2021 .983665 35,626.68 98.172000 IDC-FIS -1,266.48 83187 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828Q78 06/29/2016 1.375000 35,000.00 34,360.20 202.09 0.00 83209 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828Q78 07/08/2016 1.375000 25,000.00 24,543.00 144.36 0.00 83343 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828VF4 09/28/2016 1.375000 1,790,000.00 1,768,949.60 8,249.24 0.00 04/30/2021 .971848 25,349.18 98.172000 IDC-FIS -806.18 Inv Type: 12 TREASURY NOTES 07/23/2021 2.832094 159,625.60 100.967000 IDC-FIS 0.00 83919 CCCCD SUPRA INTL AM 4581X0CD8 10/10/2017 2.125000 220,000.00 218,930.80 1,844.03 0.00 11/09/2020 1.814044 756,951.83 99.514000 IDC-FIS -10,596.83 11/09/2020 1.814044 222,039.20 99.514000 IDC-FIS -3,108.40 01/25/2021 2.352073 89,735.40 99.768000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84157 CCCCD SUPRA INTL FI 45950KCM0 01/25/2018 2.250000 90,000.00 89,791.20 371.25 55.80 09/04/2020 1.633607 749,842.50 98.921000 IDC-FIS -7,935.00 83859 CCCSIG SUPRA INTL B 459058GA5 08/29/2017 1.625000 750,000.00 741,907.50 914.06 0.00 83896 CCCSIG SUPRA INTL B 45905UP32 09/19/2017 1.561000 800,000.00 789,728.00 659.09 0.00 83918 CCCSIG SUPRA INTL A 4581X0CD8 10/10/2017 2.125000 750,000.00 746,355.00 6,286.46 0.00 09/12/2020 1.643882 798,080.00 98.716000 IDC-FIS -8,352.00 84266 CCCSIG SUP IFC 45950VLQ7 03/16/2018 2.635000 850,000.00 849,821.50 1,370.89 459.00 84546 CCCCD SUPRA IBRD 459058GH0 07/25/2018 2.750000 725,000.00 732,010.75 3,765.97 8,707.25 04/19/2021 2.701839 972,855.00 100.495000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84548 CCCCD SUPRA IBRD 459058GH0 07/25/2018 2.750000 160,000.00 161,547.20 831.11 1,921.60 07/23/2021 2.834778 723,303.50 100.967000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84267 CCCCD SUP IFC 45950VLQ7 03/16/2018 2.635000 170,000.00 169,964.30 273.44 91.80 03/09/2021 2.661454 849,362.50 99.979000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84365 CCCSIG SUPRA IADB 4581X0DB1 04/19/2018 2.625000 975,000.00 979,826.25 11,517.19 6,971.25 03/09/2021 2.661454 169,872.50 99.979000 IDC-FIS 0.00 Subtotal 2.260523 5,490,000.00 5,479,882.50 27,833.49 18,206.70 2.252051 5,491,668.03 99.815710 -29,992.23 Inv Type: 1 SUPRANATIONALS Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 24 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 84088 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828N48 12/11/2017 1.750000 1,500,000.00 1,485,240.00 6,598.76 0.00 03/31/2022 2.130845 489,798.63 98.992000 IDC-FIS 0.00 12/31/2020 1.937773 1,491,679.69 99.016000 IDC-FIS -6,439.69 01/31/2021 2.033644 2,549,218.75 98.313000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84120 CCCSIG GOV US TRESU 912828N89 01/04/2018 1.375000 2,600,000.00 2,556,138.00 5,925.41 6,919.25 11/30/2020 1.762521 985,939.45 98.836000 IDC-FIS -7,463.05 83954 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828M98 11/03/2017 1.625000 990,000.00 978,476.40 5,391.96 0.00 83962 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828M98 11/06/2017 1.625000 1,000,000.00 988,360.00 5,470.73 0.00 84046 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828W89 12/06/2017 1.875000 495,000.00 490,010.40 25.37 211.77 11/30/2020 1.773455 995,585.94 98.836000 IDC-FIS -7,225.94 84121 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828W89 01/04/2018 1.875000 220,000.00 217,782.40 11.27 472.24 84423 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828WN6 05/22/2018 2.000000 820,000.00 815,162.00 5,496.70 12,779.19 84224 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828F96 03/05/2018 2.000000 175,000.00 173,878.25 1,469.61 1,769.85 03/31/2022 2.178392 217,310.16 98.992000 IDC-FIS 0.00 10/31/2021 2.475285 172,108.40 99.359000 IDC-FIS 0.00 10/31/2022 2.795864 222,327.34 99.199000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84391 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 9128283C2 05/04/2018 2.000000 230,000.00 228,157.70 1,931.49 5,830.36 02/28/2022 2.144211 88,696.53 98.617000 IDC-FIS 0.00 83641 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828J43 03/17/2017 1.750000 90,000.00 88,755.30 136.96 58.77 83669 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828F96 04/05/2017 2.000000 365,000.00 362,660.35 3,065.19 0.00 83814 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828XM7 07/07/2017 1.625000 2,155,000.00 2,133,363.80 5,804.21 0.00 10/31/2021 1.857459 367,266.99 99.359000 IDC-FIS -4,606.64 83479 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828K58 12/09/2016 1.375000 5,000,000.00 4,945,100.00 28,867.40 0.00 10/31/2020 1.643376 793,593.75 98.488000 IDC-FIS -5,689.75 04/30/2020 1.500519 4,979,296.88 98.902000 IDC-FIS -34,196.88 12/31/2019 1.391995 3,297,771.48 99.383000 IDC-FIS -42,978.23 83480 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828G95 12/09/2016 1.625000 3,275,000.00 3,254,793.25 13,378.19 0.00 08/31/2020 1.514468 647,283.20 98.594000 IDC-FIS -6,422.20 83840 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828L32 08/03/2017 1.375000 650,000.00 640,861.00 777.17 0.00 83884 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828L32 09/01/2017 1.375000 2,100,000.00 2,070,474.00 2,510.87 0.00 83912 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828L99 10/05/2017 1.375000 800,000.00 787,904.00 4,618.78 0.00 08/31/2020 1.441812 2,095,898.44 98.594000 IDC-FIS -25,424.44 83815 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828R77 07/07/2017 1.375000 295,000.00 289,412.70 1,359.51 0.00 07/31/2020 1.606525 2,155,522.98 98.996000 IDC-FIS -22,159.18 05/31/2021 1.805242 290,240.82 98.106000 IDC-FIS -828.12 01/31/2022 1.908201 219,682.03 98.988000 IDC-FIS -1,908.43 83820 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828V72 07/12/2017 1.875000 220,000.00 217,773.60 683.70 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 25 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 84831 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828V23 01/09/2019 2.250000 183,000.00 182,992.68 1,035.07 2,240.60 11/15/2021 2.726485 2,062,475.44 101.559000 IDC-FIS 0.00 12/31/2023 2.519720 180,854.45 99.996000 IDC-FIS 0.00 01/31/2022 2.491027 5,057,058.59 98.988000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84832 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828V72 01/09/2019 1.875000 5,150,000.00 5,097,882.00 16,004.83 40,823.41 84774 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 9128285L0 12/11/2018 2.875000 2,050,000.00 2,081,959.50 22,305.08 23,717.14 84644 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828P38 10/04/2018 1.750000 100,000.00 98,215.00 290.06 2,988.44 01/31/2023 2.933296 95,226.56 98.215000 IDC-FIS 0.00 10/15/2021 2.976704 199,793.01 101.516000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84690 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 9128285F3 11/07/2018 2.875000 200,000.00 203,032.00 2,653.84 3,602.31 01/15/2022 2.462067 1,730,035.85 100.676000 IDC-FIS 0.00 01/31/2023 2.556177 155,125.00 98.215000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84860 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828P38 01/31/2019 1.750000 160,000.00 157,144.00 464.09 2,019.00 84864 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 9128285V8 01/31/2019 2.500000 3,350,000.00 3,372,646.00 17,582.88 27,356.94 84871 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 9128285V8 02/11/2019 2.500000 1,725,000.00 1,736,661.00 9,053.87 9,841.66 01/15/2022 2.549468 3,348,990.72 100.676000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84519 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828P79 07/05/2018 1.500000 195,000.00 189,637.50 254.35 5,149.22 09/30/2022 2.759560 196,631.84 98.367000 IDC-FIS 0.00 02/28/2023 2.741166 184,488.28 97.250000 IDC-FIS 0.00 07/31/2021 2.665911 1,284,156.25 99.949000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84531 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828WY2 07/06/2018 2.250000 1,300,000.00 1,299,337.00 4,848.07 15,180.75 05/31/2021 2.744936 802,382.81 99.410000 IDC-FIS 0.00 09/15/2021 2.891621 1,991,953.13 101.172000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84473 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828WR7 06/06/2018 2.125000 1,780,000.00 1,774,161.60 9,508.49 21,209.26 84474 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828L57 06/06/2018 1.750000 205,000.00 201,652.35 13.32 5,020.51 06/30/2021 2.643910 1,752,952.34 99.672000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84561 CCCCD US TREASURY N 912828W89 08/03/2018 1.875000 115,000.00 113,840.80 5.88 2,614.24 08/15/2021 2.720393 450,369.14 101.109000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84591 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 9128284W7 09/07/2018 2.750000 450,000.00 454,990.50 1,538.33 4,621.36 84621 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 9128285A4 09/20/2018 2.750000 1,135,000.00 1,148,302.20 1,441.88 17,913.14 84626 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 9128285A4 09/21/2018 2.750000 2,000,000.00 2,023,440.00 2,540.76 31,486.87 09/15/2021 2.892892 1,130,389.06 101.172000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84580 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 9128283X6 08/30/2018 2.250000 1,310,000.00 1,308,572.10 3,664.02 11,876.79 03/31/2022 2.824938 111,226.56 98.992000 IDC-FIS 0.00 02/15/2021 2.679261 1,296,695.31 99.891000 IDC-FIS 0.00 03/31/2022 2.748783 271,742.19 98.992000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84586 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828W89 09/06/2018 1.875000 280,000.00 277,177.60 14.34 5,435.41 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 26 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 08/17/2021 1.321009 44,846.06 97.554000 IDC-FIS -946.76 83295 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0N82 08/31/2016 1.250000 260,000.00 253,640.40 397.22 0.00 83289 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0N82 08/19/2016 1.250000 140,000.00 136,575.60 213.89 0.00 08/17/2021 1.334096 139,433.00 97.554000 IDC-FIS -2,857.40 83290 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0N82 08/19/2016 1.250000 45,000.00 43,899.30 68.75 0.00 Inv Type: 23 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSO 10/12/2021 3.039012 1,075,967.50 101.722000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84688 CCCSIG GOV FHLB 3130AF5B9 11/06/2018 3.000000 1,075,000.00 1,093,511.50 15,139.58 19,694.00 05/28/2019 1.369154 2,000,220.00 99.832000 IDC-FIS -3,580.00 84861 CCCCD GOV FHLB NOTE 3130A0F70 01/31/2019 3.375000 100,000.00 104,548.00 1,059.38 1,600.61 11/15/2023 2.519294 280,142.90 102.184000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84908 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828WE6 03/08/2019 2.750000 275,000.00 281,006.00 2,843.83 3,223.77 12/08/2023 2.722019 103,444.27 104.548000 IDC-FIS 0.00 06/21/2019 1.017963 2,372,544.35 99.716000 IDC-FIS -14,260.95 83166 CCCCD GOV FHLB GLOB 3130A8DB6 06/09/2016 1.125000 2,365,000.00 2,358,283.40 7,390.64 0.00 83332 CCCCD GOV FHLB GLOB 3130A9EP2 09/21/2016 1.000000 1,900,000.00 1,886,795.00 263.89 0.00 83772 CCCCD GOV FHLB NOTE 3130ABF92 05/31/2017 1.375000 2,000,000.00 1,996,640.00 9,395.83 0.00 09/26/2019 1.062882 1,896,466.00 99.305000 IDC-FIS -9,671.00 Subtotal 1.509073 7,715,000.00 7,720,783.90 36,093.15 24,518.38 1.478461 7,728,785.02 100.074970 -27,511.95 Inv Type: 22 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 07/31/2023 2.439129 156,811.92 95.922000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84876 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828Q29 02/12/2019 1.500000 165,000.00 160,347.00 6.76 1,424.93 03/31/2023 2.443063 158,922.07 97.180000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84874 CCCSIG US TREASURY 912828V72 02/13/2019 1.875000 435,000.00 430,597.80 1,351.86 3,176.32 01/31/2022 2.488218 427,714.38 98.988000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84875 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828S92 02/12/2019 1.250000 165,000.00 158,271.30 341.85 1,527.75 84927 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828W55 03/18/2019 1.875000 325,000.00 321,636.25 529.89 1,752.46 02/28/2022 2.430857 320,181.85 98.965000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84906 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 9128286C9 03/06/2019 2.500000 725,000.00 730,321.50 2,253.11 6,142.79 02/15/2022 2.539871 725,130.02 100.734000 IDC-FIS 0.00 2.121429 48,416,816.79 99.465684 -216,086.91 Subtotal 1.911897 48,723,000.00 48,462,665.03 200,549.61 275,162.73 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 27 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 83189 CCCSIG MBS FNMA SRS 3136ASPX8 06/30/2016 1.785000 4,751.24 4,798.76 7.07 0.00 06/25/2019 1.442671 4,798.76 101.000160 BOOK 0.00 84321 CCCCD MBS FHMS K721 3137BM6P6 04/09/2018 3.090000 100,000.00 100,851.56 257.50 0.00 07/25/2019 1.464707 12,641.29 100.997649 BOOK 0.00 82778 CCCCD MBS FNMA SRS 3136AQDQ0 10/30/2015 1.646000 5,015.38 5,065.60 6.88 0.00 09/25/2019 1.382287 5,065.60 101.001320 BOOK 0.00 83093 CCCCD MBS FHLMC SRS 3137BNN26 04/28/2016 1.780000 12,516.42 12,641.29 18.59 0.00 84856 CCCSIG MBS FHMS KP0 3137FKK39 12/17/2018 3.203000 200,911.20 200,910.60 536.27 0.00 09/25/2021 2.944966 78,253.55 101.989121 BOOK 0.00 08/25/2022 2.882712 100,851.56 100.851560 BOOK 0.00 84376 CCCCD MBS FNMA 2018 3136B1XP4 04/30/2018 3.560000 76,727.35 78,253.55 524.29 0.00 Inv Type: 26 AGENCY MBS FXD-M 30/360 02/13/2024 2.576010 298,938.00 100.936000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84877 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTE 3130AFW94 02/15/2019 2.500000 300,000.00 302,808.00 958.33 3,870.00 08/02/2019 1.509791 3,350,054.00 99.471000 IDC-FIS 0.00 83647 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0N33 03/21/2017 .875000 3,400,000.00 3,382,014.00 4,875.69 31,960.00 83812 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0S38 06/29/2017 2.000000 300,000.00 297,672.00 1,433.33 0.00 84766 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0U43 12/06/2018 2.875000 340,000.00 347,956.00 515.90 8,642.80 01/05/2022 1.851838 301,917.00 99.224000 IDC-FIS -4,245.00 83335 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0P49 09/23/2016 1.000000 1,995,000.00 1,983,089.85 1,828.74 0.00 08/17/2021 1.337550 258,910.60 97.554000 IDC-FIS -5,270.20 08/28/2019 1.020798 1,993,803.00 99.403000 IDC-FIS -10,713.15 08/28/2019 .994725 1,820,273.00 99.403000 IDC-FIS -11,138.40 83340 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0P49 09/28/2016 1.000000 1,820,000.00 1,809,134.60 1,668.32 0.00 09/12/2023 2.920145 339,313.20 102.340000 IDC-FIS 0.00 01/11/2022 2.620467 1,001,718.33 100.905000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84859 CCCSIG GOV FNMA NOT 3135G0U92 01/31/2019 2.630000 1,000,000.00 1,009,050.00 5,841.66 8,790.00 02/05/2024 2.579933 74,721.00 100.939000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84868 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0V34 02/08/2019 2.500000 75,000.00 75,704.25 276.04 983.25 01/11/2022 2.650125 149,892.00 100.905000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84833 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0U92 01/11/2019 2.625000 150,000.00 151,357.50 875.00 1,465.50 01/11/2022 2.650125 849,388.00 100.905000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84834 CCCSIG GOV FNMA NOT 3135G0U92 01/11/2019 2.625000 850,000.00 857,692.50 4,958.33 8,304.50 Subtotal 1.418639 10,675,000.00 10,650,594.00 23,911.20 64,016.05 1.626756 10,623,207.19 99.771372 -35,170.91 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 28 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 08/17/2020 1.141339 71,569.54 99.997331 BOOK 0.00 83281 CCCSIG ABS TOYOTA A 89237WAD9 08/10/2016 1.140000 71,571.45 71,569.54 36.26 0.00 04/15/2021 1.295868 261,918.60 99.986540 BOOK 0.00 83333 CCCSIG ABS HYUNDAI 44891EAC3 09/21/2016 1.290000 261,953.86 261,918.60 150.19 0.00 01/15/2021 1.326574 75,147.10 99.984486 BOOK 0.00 83008 CCCSIG ABS HYUNDAI 44930UAD8 03/30/2016 1.560000 57,310.30 57,299.18 39.73 0.00 03/16/2020 1.252803 40,049.88 99.994332 BOOK 0.00 83091 CCCSIG ABS CORP NIS 65478VAD9 04/27/2016 1.320000 75,158.76 75,147.10 44.09 0.00 09/15/2020 1.568722 57,299.18 99.980597 BOOK 0.00 83750 CCCSIG ABS TOTOTA A 89190BAD0 05/17/2017 1.760000 625,017.37 624,969.44 488.90 0.00 08/16/2021 1.785395 55,394.94 99.993213 BOOK 0.00 83658 CCCSIG ABS ALLY AUT 02007HAC5 03/29/2017 1.780000 55,398.70 55,394.94 43.83 0.00 08/16/2021 1.763698 312,860.77 99.991908 BOOK 0.00 83659 CCCSIG ABS HYUNDAI 44931PAD8 03/29/2017 1.760000 312,886.09 312,860.77 244.75 0.00 82964 CCCSIG ABS TOYOTA C 89237KAD5 03/02/2016 1.250000 40,052.15 40,049.88 22.25 0.00 Inv Type: 50 AUTO ABS FXD-M 30/360 10/15/2021 1.823435 224,983.53 99.992680 BOOK 0.00 83825 CCCSIG ABS JOHN DEE 47788BAD6 07/18/2017 1.820000 225,000.00 224,983.53 182.00 0.00 84207 CCCSIG JDOT 2018 CO 47788CAC6 02/28/2018 2.660000 190,000.00 189,986.34 224.62 0.00 04/18/2022 2.663481 189,986.34 99.992811 BOOK 0.00 2.208035 414,969.87 99.992740 0.00 Subtotal 2.204579 415,000.00 414,969.87 406.62 0.00 Inv Type: 49 CORP ABS FXD-M 30/360 04/15/2019 1.131578 5,998,800.00 99.948000 IDC-FIS -1,920.00 82996 CCCCD GOV FHLMC NOT 3137EADZ9 03/22/2016 1.125000 6,000,000.00 5,996,880.00 31,125.00 0.00 1.131578 5,998,800.00 99.948000 -1,920.00 Subtotal 1.125000 6,000,000.00 5,996,880.00 31,125.00 0.00 Inv Type: 29 FHLMC NOTES 07/25/2023 3.203060 200,910.60 99.999701 BOOK 0.00 2.974127 402,521.36 100.650070 0.00 Subtotal 3.162903 399,921.59 402,521.36 1,350.60 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 29 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 84542 CCCCD ABS NAROT 201 65479GAD1 07/25/2018 3.060000 65,000.00 64,997.89 88.40 0.00 01/17/2023 3.031706 409,984.26 99.996161 BOOK 0.00 03/15/2023 3.061387 64,997.89 99.996754 BOOK 0.00 01/17/2023 3.031708 69,997.31 99.996157 BOOK 0.00 84544 CCCCD ABS MBART 201 58772RAD6 07/25/2018 3.030000 70,000.00 69,997.31 94.27 0.00 84541 CCCSIG ABS MBART 20 58772RAD6 07/25/2018 3.030000 410,000.00 409,984.26 552.13 0.00 84535 CCCSIG ABS GMCAR 20 36255JAD6 07/18/2018 3.020000 250,000.00 249,941.70 314.58 0.00 05/16/2023 3.029757 249,941.70 99.976680 BOOK 0.00 06/15/2023 3.135636 199,972.74 99.986370 BOOK 0.00 84540 CCCSIG ABS CARMX 20 14313FAD1 07/25/2018 3.130000 200,000.00 199,972.74 278.22 0.00 07/20/2021 3.270188 149,979.15 99.986100 BOOK 0.00 12/15/2021 3.195186 239,979.72 99.991550 BOOK 0.00 84628 CCCSIG ABS FORDL 20 34531LAD2 09/21/2018 3.190000 240,000.00 239,979.72 340.27 0.00 84632 CCCSIG ABS GMALT 20 36256GAD1 09/26/2018 3.180000 175,000.00 174,986.18 170.04 0.00 84654 CCCSIG ABS BMWLT 20 05586CAC8 10/17/2018 3.260000 150,000.00 149,979.15 149.42 0.00 06/21/2021 3.185694 174,986.18 99.992103 BOOK 0.00 83973 CCCSIG ABS TAOT 201 89238KAD4 11/15/2017 1.930000 225,000.00 224,979.26 193.11 0.00 04/15/2021 1.804194 90,807.84 99.992655 BOOK 0.00 01/18/2022 1.934403 224,979.26 99.990782 BOOK 0.00 06/15/2022 2.355239 109,987.28 99.988436 BOOK 0.00 84175 CCCCD ABS ALLYA 201 02007MAE0 01/31/2018 2.350000 110,000.00 109,987.28 114.90 0.00 07/15/2021 1.763665 624,969.44 99.992331 BOOK 0.00 01/17/2023 3.003013 109,992.48 99.993164 BOOK 0.00 83855 CCCSIG ABS NAROT 20 65478GAD2 08/23/2017 1.750000 500,000.00 499,972.05 388.89 0.00 83939 CCCSIG ABS CARMAX 2 14314RAH5 10/25/2017 1.800000 90,814.51 90,807.84 72.65 0.00 10/15/2021 1.752684 499,972.05 99.994410 BOOK 0.00 84176 CCCSIG ABS ALLYA 20 02007MAE0 01/31/2018 2.350000 265,000.00 264,969.37 276.88 0.00 09/15/2022 2.960687 99,998.51 99.998510 BOOK 0.00 84409 CCCCD ABS TOYOTA 20 89238TAD5 05/16/2018 2.960000 100,000.00 99,998.51 131.56 0.00 84422 CCCSIG ABS FORDO 20 34528FAD0 05/22/2018 3.030000 225,000.00 224,963.62 303.00 0.00 84510 CCCCD ABS ALLYA 201 02007JAC1 06/27/2018 3.000000 110,000.00 109,992.48 146.67 0.00 11/15/2022 3.037269 224,963.62 99.983831 BOOK 0.00 84177 CCCCD ABS TAOT 2018 89238BAD4 01/31/2018 2.350000 100,000.00 99,998.85 104.44 0.00 06/15/2022 2.355236 264,969.37 99.988442 BOOK 0.00 05/16/2022 2.396566 99,998.85 99.998850 BOOK 0.00 07/15/2022 2.797121 129,980.42 99.984938 BOOK 0.00 84405 CCCSIG ABS HART 201 44891KAD7 04/18/2018 2.790000 130,000.00 129,980.42 161.20 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 30 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 04/05/2019 1.910000 1,935,000.00 99.993584 IDC-FIS -124.14 84188 CCCCD CREDIT SUISSE 22549LFR1 02/08/2018 2.670000 110,000.00 109,990.44 3,402.03 0.00 84192 CCCSIG CREDIT SUISS 22549LFR1 02/08/2018 2.670000 755,000.00 754,934.40 23,350.26 0.00 11/16/2020 2.270000 800,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 83976 CCCSIG YCD SWEDBANK 87019U6D6 11/17/2017 2.270000 800,000.00 800,000.00 6,860.44 0.00 11/16/2020 2.270000 225,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 83977 CCCCD YCD SWEDBANK 87019U6D6 11/17/2017 2.270000 225,000.00 225,000.00 1,929.50 0.00 02/07/2020 2.670000 110,000.00 99.991312 IDC-FIS -9.56 83675 CCCCD YCD BK OF NOV 06417GUE6 04/06/2017 1.910000 1,935,000.00 1,934,875.86 18,273.94 0.00 Inv Type: 72 NEGOTIABLE CERT OF DEPOSIT 84172 CCCSIG ABS CCCIT 20 17305EGK5 01/31/2018 2.490000 350,000.00 349,951.56 1,718.79 0.00 01/20/2023 2.495080 349,951.56 99.986160 BOOK 0.00 Subtotal 2.490000 350,000.00 349,951.56 1,718.79 0.00 2.495080 349,951.56 99.986160 0.00 Inv Type: 53 CREDIT ABS FXD-SA 30/360 84872 CCCSIG ABS NAROT 20 65479KAD2 02/13/2019 2.900000 550,000.00 549,916.68 708.89 0.00 11/15/2021 3.102041 154,995.46 99.997071 BOOK 0.00 84873 CCCSIG ABS ALLYA 20 02004WAC5 02/13/2019 2.910000 325,000.00 324,960.74 420.33 0.00 10/16/2023 2.906625 549,916.68 99.984851 BOOK 0.00 84855 CCCSIG ABS MBALT 20 58772TAC4 01/30/2019 3.100000 155,000.00 154,995.46 213.56 0.00 09/15/2021 3.211543 499,988.80 99.997760 BOOK 0.00 84698 CCCSIG ABS MBALT 20 58769LAC6 11/20/2018 3.210000 500,000.00 499,988.80 713.33 0.00 11/16/2023 2.974624 224,975.09 99.988929 BOOK 0.00 84837 CCCSIG ABS GMCAR 20 36256XAD4 01/16/2019 2.970000 225,000.00 224,975.09 222.76 0.00 05/15/2020 2.912229 264,979.28 99.992181 BOOK 0.00 84897 CCCCD ABS HARROT 20 43814WAC9 02/27/2019 2.830000 100,000.00 99,997.32 102.19 0.00 03/20/2023 2.831301 99,997.32 99.997320 BOOK 0.00 84890 CCCSIG ABS FORDL 20 34532FAD4 02/25/2019 2.900000 265,000.00 264,979.28 341.56 0.00 09/15/2023 2.915375 324,960.74 99.987920 BOOK 0.00 84885 CCCSIG ABS GMALT 20 36256UAD0 02/21/2019 2.980000 225,000.00 224,964.68 204.88 0.00 12/20/2021 2.990955 224,964.68 99.984302 BOOK 0.00 2.557682 7,259,476.13 99.990537 0.00 Subtotal 2.552120 7,260,163.19 7,259,476.13 7,878.13 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 31 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 82716 CCCCD CORP MICROSOF 594918AC8 09/29/2015 4.200000 1,400,000.00 1,403,332.00 19,600.00 0.00 06/01/2019 1.599996 1,529,290.00 100.238000 IDC-FIS -125,958.00 83177 CCCCD CORP JP MORGA 48127HAA7 06/22/2016 2.200000 1,100,000.00 1,096,887.00 10,688.33 0.00 05/15/2019 1.748923 1,984,068.80 99.944000 IDC-FIS -25,166.40 82513 CCCCD CORP GENERAL 36962G4D3 04/15/2015 6.000000 100,000.00 100,952.00 900.00 0.00 08/07/2019 1.743001 117,603.00 100.952000 IDC-FIS -16,651.00 82713 CCCCD CORP PFIZER I 717081DL4 09/29/2015 2.100000 1,960,000.00 1,958,902.40 15,549.33 0.00 10/22/2019 1.726909 1,116,775.00 99.717000 IDC-FIS -19,888.00 Inv Type: 75 CORPORATE NOTES 02/26/2021 2.970000 800,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 84893 CCCSIG YCD MUFG BAN 55379WZT6 02/28/2019 2.970000 800,000.00 800,000.00 2,112.00 0.00 02/26/2021 2.970000 115,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 84894 CCCCD YCD MUFG BANK 55379WZT6 02/28/2019 2.970000 115,000.00 115,000.00 303.60 0.00 10/16/2020 3.476115 109,850.40 99.864000 BOOK 0.00 84560 CCCSIG YCD BANK OF 06370REU9 08/03/2018 3.190000 775,000.00 775,000.00 16,550.34 0.00 08/03/2020 3.190000 175,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 84559 CCCCD YCD BANK OF M 06370REU9 08/03/2018 3.190000 175,000.00 175,000.00 3,737.17 0.00 08/03/2020 3.190000 775,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 84655 CCCSIG YCD SUMITOMO 86565BPC9 10/18/2018 3.390000 750,000.00 748,980.00 11,653.13 0.00 10/16/2020 3.476115 748,980.00 99.864000 BOOK 0.00 84656 CCCCD YCD SUMITOMO 86565BPC9 10/18/2018 3.390000 110,000.00 109,850.40 1,709.13 0.00 Subtotal 3.179157 2,725,000.00 2,723,830.40 36,065.37 0.00 3.206309 2,723,830.40 99.957079 0.00 Inv Type: 74 CERT OF DEPOSIT MEDIUM TERM 04/10/2020 3.252498 800,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 84327 CCCSIG YCD CREDIT A 22532XHT8 04/10/2018 3.252498 800,000.00 800,000.00 5,854.50 0.00 03/02/2020 2.900000 1,200,000.00 100.273343 IDC-FIS 0.00 84328 CCCSIG YCD CANADIAN 13606BVF0 04/10/2018 3.182500 800,000.00 800,000.00 5,728.50 0.00 02/07/2020 2.670000 755,000.00 99.991312 IDC-FIS -65.60 84246 CCCSIG YCD UBS AG S 90275DHG8 03/06/2018 2.900000 1,200,000.00 1,203,280.11 2,706.67 3,280.11 04/10/2020 3.182500 800,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 2.560022 6,625,000.00 100.046503 -199.30 Subtotal 2.560022 6,625,000.00 6,628,080.81 68,105.84 3,280.11 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 32 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 83851 CCCSIG CORP EXXON M 30231GAG7 08/17/2017 1.912000 400,000.00 397,592.00 531.11 0.00 12/27/2020 2.319822 227,045.25 99.450000 IDC-FIS -3,282.75 03/06/2020 1.719253 401,916.00 99.398000 IDC-FIS -4,324.00 12/14/2020 1.853307 212,310.00 99.560000 IDC-FIS -3,234.00 83863 CCCSIG CORP VISA IN 92826CAB8 08/30/2017 2.200000 210,000.00 209,076.00 1,373.17 0.00 83842 CCCCD CORP GOLDMAN 38141GWG5 08/04/2017 2.600000 225,000.00 223,762.50 1,527.50 0.00 83824 CCCSIG CORP AMERI H 02665WBT7 07/20/2017 1.950000 505,000.00 499,914.65 1,942.15 0.00 06/05/2020 1.839965 849,014.00 99.067000 IDC-FIS -6,944.50 07/20/2020 1.984846 504,489.95 98.993000 IDC-FIS -4,575.30 06/16/2020 2.122846 764,055.00 100.077000 IDC-FIS -13,477.50 83839 CCCSIG CORP MORGAN 61761JB32 08/03/2017 2.800000 750,000.00 750,577.50 6,125.00 0.00 12/08/2021 2.488448 254,137.50 99.974000 IDC-FIS -4,202.50 83879 CCCCD CORP CITIGRP 172967LC3 08/31/2017 2.900000 250,000.00 249,935.00 2,275.69 0.00 83885 CCCSIG CORP CATERPI 14913Q2A6 09/07/2017 1.850000 635,000.00 627,868.95 881.06 0.00 83890 CCCCD CORP BANK OF 06406FAA1 09/07/2017 2.500000 125,000.00 124,696.25 1,440.97 0.00 09/04/2020 1.879031 634,466.60 98.877000 IDC-FIS -6,597.65 07/22/2020 1.922970 245,783.25 102.244000 IDC-FIS -15,734.25 83309 CCCCD CORP JP MORGA 46625HHS2 09/02/2016 4.400000 225,000.00 230,049.00 1,897.50 0.00 83380 CCCSIG CORP TOYOTA 89236TDH5 10/18/2016 1.550000 510,000.00 507,001.20 3,579.21 0.00 83423 CCCSIG CORP PFIZER 717081EB5 11/21/2016 1.700000 580,000.00 575,186.00 2,903.22 0.00 10/18/2019 1.567127 509,745.00 99.412000 IDC-FIS -2,743.80 83286 CCCSIG CORP BERKSHI 084664CK5 08/15/2016 1.300000 375,000.00 373,241.25 622.92 0.00 83793 CCCSIG CORP WALT DI 25468PDU7 06/06/2017 1.800000 850,000.00 842,069.50 4,930.00 0.00 08/15/2019 1.333092 374,636.25 99.531000 IDC-FIS -1,395.00 03/04/2021 1.900017 246,189.60 99.515000 IDC-FIS -7,353.60 83307 CCCCD CORP WELLS FA 949746RS2 09/02/2016 2.500000 240,000.00 238,836.00 450.00 0.00 12/15/2019 1.724022 579,887.04 99.170000 IDC-FIS -4,701.04 83668 CCCSIG CORP CHEVRON 166764BP4 04/05/2017 1.991000 1,075,000.00 1,069,173.50 1,664.69 0.00 03/03/2020 2.236036 169,823.20 99.536000 IDC-FIS -612.00 03/03/2020 1.873043 1,078,569.00 99.458000 IDC-FIS -9,395.50 05/11/2020 1.835100 529,459.40 99.222000 IDC-FIS -3,582.80 83739 CCCSIG CORP APPLE I 037833CS7 05/11/2017 1.800000 530,000.00 525,876.60 3,710.00 0.00 01/27/2020 2.393173 241,764.00 99.888000 IDC-FIS -2,032.80 83589 CCCCD CORP MORGAN S 61747YDW2 02/03/2017 2.650000 240,000.00 239,731.20 1,130.67 0.00 83595 CCCSIG CORP APPLE I 037833CK4 02/09/2017 1.900000 600,000.00 597,198.00 1,710.00 0.00 83625 CCCCD CORP AMERICAN 0258M0EE5 03/03/2017 2.200000 170,000.00 169,211.20 290.89 0.00 02/07/2020 1.916933 599,706.00 99.533000 IDC-FIS -2,508.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 33 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 84202 CCCSIG CORP PACCAR 69371RN93 02/27/2018 2.800000 500,000.00 501,625.00 1,166.67 1,870.00 08/17/2020 2.805542 497,545.00 99.989000 IDC-FIS 0.00 03/01/2021 2.817011 499,755.00 100.325000 IDC-FIS 0.00 02/28/2021 2.806895 127,758.80 99.338000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84225 CCCCD CORP CICSO SY 17275RBD3 03/05/2018 2.200000 130,000.00 129,139.40 262.17 1,380.60 84200 CCCSIG BANK OF NY M 06406HDD8 02/21/2018 2.600000 500,000.00 499,945.00 1,588.89 2,400.00 84087 CCCSIG CORP CITIGRO 172967KB6 12/11/2017 2.650000 600,000.00 598,500.00 6,845.83 0.00 10/26/2020 2.497862 602,508.00 99.750000 IDC-FIS -4,008.00 01/08/2021 2.368059 304,841.40 99.566000 IDC-FIS -1,165.10 84126 CCCSIG CORP JOHN DE 24422ETZ2 01/08/2018 2.350000 305,000.00 303,676.30 1,652.51 0.00 03/22/2021 2.929170 646,678.50 100.353000 IDC-FIS 0.00 03/15/2021 2.937862 329,633.70 100.512000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84247 CCCSIG NATIONAL RUR 63743HER9 02/26/2018 2.900000 330,000.00 331,689.60 425.33 2,055.90 84255 CCCSIG CORP JOHN DE 24422EUD9 03/13/2018 2.875000 400,000.00 401,920.00 606.94 2,192.00 84277 CCCSIG CORP UNILEVE 904764AZ0 03/22/2018 2.750000 650,000.00 652,294.50 446.88 5,616.00 03/12/2021 2.898871 399,728.00 100.480000 IDC-FIS 0.00 83921 CCCSIG CORP PEPSICO 713448DX3 10/10/2017 2.000000 375,000.00 371,790.00 3,458.33 0.00 10/01/2021 2.328000 545,000.00 99.070000 IDC-FIS -5,068.50 04/15/2021 2.005881 374,925.00 99.144000 IDC-FIS -3,135.00 04/15/2021 2.005881 69,986.00 99.144000 IDC-FIS -585.20 83922 CCCCD CORP PEPSICO 713448DX3 10/10/2017 2.000000 70,000.00 69,400.80 645.56 0.00 04/15/2021 2.072430 126,846.25 99.757000 IDC-FIS -2,150.00 04/01/2021 2.098958 474,249.50 99.116000 IDC-FIS -3,448.50 83891 CCCSIG CORP IBM CRE 44932HAA1 09/08/2017 1.625000 700,000.00 697,165.00 789.93 0.00 83894 CCCSIG CORP BOFA CA 06051GGS2 09/18/2017 2.328000 545,000.00 539,931.50 6,343.80 0.00 09/06/2019 1.663919 699,468.00 99.595000 IDC-FIS -2,303.00 83940 CCCSIG CORP BB&T MT 05531FAZ6 10/26/2017 2.150000 215,000.00 212,981.15 770.43 0.00 02/01/2021 2.189947 109,864.70 99.061000 IDC-FIS -897.60 83964 CCCCD CORP BB T MTN 05531FAZ6 11/06/2017 2.150000 110,000.00 108,967.10 394.16 0.00 83969 CCCSIG CORP PACCAR 69371RN85 11/13/2017 2.050000 225,000.00 223,035.75 1,768.13 0.00 83971 CCCSIG CORP UNITED 911312BP0 11/14/2017 2.050000 475,000.00 470,801.00 4,868.75 0.00 11/13/2020 2.053109 224,979.75 99.127000 IDC-FIS -1,944.00 83949 CCCSIG CORP HONEYWE 438516BQ8 10/30/2017 1.800000 240,000.00 238,819.20 1,812.00 0.00 02/01/2021 2.165131 214,901.10 99.061000 IDC-FIS -1,919.95 10/30/2019 1.839901 239,812.80 99.508000 IDC-FIS -993.60 04/19/2021 2.398027 110,823.90 99.751000 IDC-FIS -1,097.80 83952 CCCCD CORP BANK OF 06051GFW4 11/03/2017 2.625000 110,000.00 109,726.10 1,299.38 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 34 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 84645 CCCSIG CORP AMERICA 02665WCP4 10/10/2018 3.375000 300,000.00 305,265.00 3,121.88 5,409.00 09/14/2021 3.072054 184,620.75 101.162000 IDC-FIS 0.00 12/10/2021 3.392166 299,856.00 101.755000 IDC-FIS 0.00 03/01/2022 3.341128 224,383.50 102.270000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84757 CCCSIG CORP HOME DE 437076BV3 12/06/2018 3.250000 225,000.00 230,107.50 609.38 5,724.00 84618 CCCSIG CORP 3M COMP 88579YBA8 09/14/2018 3.000000 185,000.00 187,149.70 262.08 2,528.95 84593 CCCSIG CORP UNILEVE 904764BF3 09/07/2018 3.000000 100,000.00 100,984.00 200.00 1,468.00 09/07/2021 3.177112 99,923.00 101.152000 IDC-FIS 0.00 03/07/2022 3.147126 99,516.00 100.984000 IDC-FIS 0.00 09/15/2021 3.046915 249,662.50 101.606000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84594 CCCSIG CORP PFIZER 717081EM1 09/07/2018 3.000000 250,000.00 254,015.00 333.33 4,352.50 01/08/2021 3.081164 234,859.00 100.904000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84830 CCCSIG CORP TOYOTA 89236TFQ3 01/08/2019 3.050000 235,000.00 237,124.40 1,652.51 2,265.40 84863 CCCCD CORP TOYOTA M 89236TFS9 01/31/2019 3.350000 145,000.00 148,932.40 1,119.92 2,810.10 84887 CCCSIG CORP 3M COMP 88579YBF7 02/22/2019 2.750000 245,000.00 247,136.40 729.90 2,251.55 01/08/2024 3.179008 146,432.64 102.712000 IDC-FIS 0.00 03/01/2023 3.195058 58,457.40 99.440000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84308 CCCCD CORP CATERPIL 14912L5Q0 04/05/2018 2.625000 60,000.00 59,664.00 131.25 1,206.60 84309 CCCCD CORP HOME DEP 437076AZ5 04/05/2018 2.700000 100,000.00 100,494.00 1,350.00 2,394.00 84399 CCCSIG CORP HERSHEY 427866AY4 05/10/2018 2.900000 350,000.00 352,240.00 3,834.44 2,471.00 04/01/2023 3.114098 98,100.00 100.494000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84290 CCCSIG CORP HSBC US 40428HPR7 03/29/2018 2.350000 400,000.00 398,828.00 678.89 3,924.00 84592 CCCSIG CORP CATERPI 14913Q2N8 09/07/2018 3.150000 100,000.00 101,152.00 210.00 1,229.00 03/05/2020 3.032909 394,904.00 99.707000 IDC-FIS 0.00 04/25/2022 3.122993 111,854.75 99.305000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84307 CCCCD CORP NATL RUR 637432NM3 04/05/2018 2.400000 115,000.00 114,200.75 1,196.00 2,346.00 05/15/2020 2.933837 349,769.00 100.640000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84470 CCCSIG CORP BBT COR 05531FBD4 06/05/2018 3.200000 150,000.00 151,657.50 373.33 1,836.00 05/21/2021 3.251084 499,985.00 101.254000 IDC-FIS 0.00 09/03/2021 3.235931 149,821.50 101.105000 IDC-FIS 0.00 06/23/2021 3.126857 594,970.25 101.372000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84511 CCCSIG CORP WALMART 931142EJ8 06/27/2018 3.125000 595,000.00 603,163.40 5,061.63 8,193.15 05/11/2020 3.058819 458,371.60 100.331000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84402 CCCSIG CORP GENERAL 369550BA5 05/11/2018 2.875000 460,000.00 461,522.60 5,143.06 3,151.00 84411 CCCSIG CORP AMERICA 025816BU2 05/17/2018 3.375000 785,000.00 795,063.70 9,861.56 10,197.15 84421 CCCSIG CORP CHARLES 808513AW5 05/22/2018 3.250000 500,000.00 506,270.00 5,868.06 6,285.00 05/17/2021 3.381007 784,866.55 101.282000 IDC-FIS 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 35 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 02/20/2020 2.720000 170,000.00 97.652778 IDC-FIS -3,990.28 06/05/2020 3.099862 799,696.00 99.962000 BOOK 0.00 84197 CCCCD NORDEA BANK A 65590ASN7 02/22/2018 2.720000 170,000.00 166,009.72 526.62 0.00 84196 CCCSIG NORDEA BANK 65590ASN7 02/22/2018 2.720000 800,000.00 781,222.22 2,478.22 0.00 02/20/2020 2.720000 800,000.00 97.652778 IDC-FIS -18,777.78 84486 CCCSIG ROYAL BANK O 78012UEE1 06/08/2018 3.240000 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 10,260.00 0.00 06/07/2021 3.240000 1,000,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 84476 CCCCSIG YCD BANK OF 06417GU22 06/07/2018 3.080000 800,000.00 799,696.00 7,939.56 0.00 84477 CCCCD YCD BANK OF N 06417GU22 06/07/2018 3.080000 150,000.00 149,943.00 1,488.66 0.00 06/05/2020 3.099862 149,943.00 99.962000 BOOK 0.00 3.021658 2,919,639.00 99.207909 -22,768.06 Subtotal 3.015197 2,920,000.00 2,896,870.94 22,693.06 0.00 Inv Type: 79 YCD/NCD 30/360 08/03/2020 2.050000 1,460,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 83844 CCCSIG MTN WESTPAC 96121T4A3 08/07/2017 2.050000 1,460,000.00 1,460,000.00 4,489.50 0.00 2.050000 1,460,000.00 100.000000 0.00 Subtotal 2.050000 1,460,000.00 1,460,000.00 4,489.50 0.00 Inv Type: 78 NEGOTIABLE CD 30/360 EUR 84923 CCCSIG CORP MERCK A 589331AT4 03/15/2019 2.400000 300,000.00 298,608.00 320.00 1,674.00 84926 CCCSIG CORP GOLDMAN 38141GWC4 03/18/2019 3.000000 325,000.00 324,294.75 4,197.91 1,046.50 03/11/2022 2.802099 169,989.80 100.867000 IDC-FIS 0.00 03/01/2022 2.766133 244,884.85 100.872000 IDC-FIS 0.00 84915 CCCSIG CORP PFIZER 717081ER0 03/11/2019 2.800000 170,000.00 171,473.90 264.44 1,484.10 84932 CCCSIG CORP JPMORGA 46647PBB1 03/22/2019 3.207000 800,000.00 804,816.00 641.40 4,816.00 09/15/2022 2.708028 296,934.00 99.536000 IDC-FIS 0.00 04/01/2023 3.207000 800,000.00 100.602000 IDC-FIS 0.00 04/26/2022 3.182983 327,094.08 99.783000 IDC-FIS 0.00 Subtotal 2.545056 26,430,000.00 26,426,640.10 168,030.07 94,577.50 2.305855 26,649,295.41 99.987288 -313,076.64 Grand Total Count 204 2.087852 127,188,084.78 126,873,146.60 630,250.43 479,761.47 2.133482 127,063,960.76 99.752384 -646,726.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss Page 36 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2019 Run: 04/18/2019 01:02:41 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 SUPRANATIONAL 5,490.00 5,491.67 5,479.88 99.79 %-11.79 2.25 % MBS/ABS 8,425.08 8,426.92 8,426.92 100.00 %0.00 2.56 % CORPORATE NOTES 26,430.00 26,649.30 26,426.64 99.16 %-218.50 2.31 % NCD/YCD 13,730.00 13,728.47 13,708.78 99.86 %-19.69 2.73 % U.S. AGENCIES 24,390.00 24,350.79 24,368.26 100.07 %23.93 1.46 % U.S. TREASURIES 48,723.00 48,416.82 48,462.67 100.09 %59.08 2.12 % Totals(000's)127,188.08 127,063.96 126,873.15 99.85 %-166.96 2.13 % Assets (000's)Current Par Current Book Market MKT/Book Un Gain/Loss Yield Asset Allocation Page 37 SECTION III APPENDIX B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL – MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED PARTIES B.2. STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AS OF MARCH 31, 2019 . CALIFORNIA STATE LOCAL STATE CONTROLLER ACCOUNT ESTIMATED AGENCY INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS ACCOUNT NUMBER BALANCE FAIR VALUE ACALANES UNION HIGH SCHOOL 75-07-010 983,620.59 983,765.14 ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-005 856,681.45 856,807.34 BRENTWOOD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-013 8,054,003.47 8,055,187.04 BYRON UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-017 171,621.84 171,647.06 CANYON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-018 199,524.45 199,553.77 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT 70-07-001 24,700,000.00 24,703,629.76 CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE 75-07-001 638,455.69 638,549.51 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 99-07-000 65,000,000.00 65,009,552.01 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION 75-07-007 1,329,285.80 1,329,481.14 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SCHOOL INSURANCE GROUP 35-07-001 2,314,081.59 2,314,421.65 CROCKETT COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 16-07-004 4,097,750.13 4,098,352.31 DELTA DIABLO SANITATION DISTRICT 70-07-003 75,267.51 75,278.57 EAST CONTRA COSTA REG FEE & FINANCING AUTH 40-07-006 1,046,552.37 1,046,706.17 KENSINGTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 17-07-011 3,972,674.03 3,973,257.83 KENSINGTON POLICE PROTECTION & COMMUNITY 16-07-003 983,938.57 984,083.16 SERVICES DISTRICT LAFAYETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-012 5,046,056.37 5,046,797.91 MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-011 23,115,944.90 23,119,341.88 MORAGA ORINDA FIRE DISTRICT 17-07-003 6,100,484.52 6,101,381.01 MORAGA SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-016 2,772.24 2,772.65 MT DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-008 3,556,522.27 3,557,044.92 MT VIEW SANITARY DISTRICT 70-07-008 7,869,465.64 7,870,622.09 OAKLEY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-009 256,338.96 256,376.63 ORINDA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-015 3,695,478.73 3,696,021.80 PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-002 36,456.60 36,461.96 RECLAMATION DISTRICT 799 60-07-001 85,185.49 85,198.01 RECLAMATION DISTRICT 800 60-07-003 2,902,835.45 2,903,262.03 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 65-07-015 7,242.19 7,243.25 RODEO -HERCULES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 17-07-001 109,746.03 109,762.16 SAN RAMON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-004 248,381.21 248,417.71 WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-014 42,379,392.76 42,385,620.58 TOTAL 209,835,760.85 209,866,597.05 Page 38 SECTION III APPENDIX B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL – MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED PARTIES ASSET MANAGEMENT FUNDS B.3. WELLS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT B.4. CalTRUST (SHORT TERM) B.5. CalTRUST (LIQUIDITY) WFAM GAAP01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed IncomeThe information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may notbe available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings and transactions. Notethat certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.Wells Fargo Asset Management is a trade name used by the asset management businesses of Wells Fargo & Company.Page 39 Risk Summary (WC-Contra Costa County)1Performance Summary Gross of Fees (WC-Contra Costa County)5Performance Summary Net of Fees (WC-Contra Costa County)7GAAP Financials (WC-Contra Costa County)9Income Detail (WC-Contra Costa County)11Balance Sheet Classification (WC-Contra Costa County)17Trading Activity (WC-Contra Costa County)23Transaction Detail (WC-Contra Costa County)32MMF Transaction Detail (WC-Contra Costa County)42Roll Forward (WC-Contra Costa County)45Shock Analysis (WC-Contra Costa County)50Table of ContentsPage 40 Cash and Fixed Income SummaryRisk MetricValueCash875.30MMFund127,190.06Fixed Income44,447,217.16Duration0.40Convexity0.00WAL0.47Years to Final Maturity 0.64Years to Effective Maturity 0.50Yield2.55Book Yield2.58Avg Credit RatingAA+/Aa1/AA+Balance SheetBook Value + Accrued44,556,952.46Net Unrealized Gain/Loss18,330.06Market Value + Accrued44,575,282.52Asset ClassIssuer ConcentrationIssuer Concentration% of BaseMarket Value+ AccruedOther54.06%Federal Home Loan Banks Office ofFinance16.81%Agfirst Farm Credit Bank11.10%Government of the United States6.71%United Nations4.05%Capital One Multi-Asset Execution Trust 2.80%Inter-American Development Bank 2.25%Old Line Funding, LLC2.22%---100.00%Footnotes: 1,2Security TypeMarket SectorRisk SummaryBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 41 Credit Duration Heat MapRating 0 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5 - 7 7 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 30AAA 62.30% 2.26% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%AA 17.19% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%A 14.96% 3.28% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%BBB 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%BB 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%B 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%CCC 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%CC 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%C 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%NA 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%Time To MaturityCredit RatingDurationRisk SummaryBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 42 CurrencyBase Exposure - Industry SectorBase Exposure - Industry GroupBase Exposure - Industry SubgroupMMF Asset AllocationCountryRisk SummaryBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 43 1: * Grouped by: Issuer Concentration. 2: * Groups Sorted by: % of Base Market Value + Accrued.Risk SummaryBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 44 PeriodPeriod BeginPeriod EndTotal Return, Grossof FeesWeighted AverageIndex ReturnExcess Total Return,Gross of FeesMonth to Date03/01/201903/31/20190.25%0.24%0.00%Quarter to Date01/01/201903/31/20190.76%0.65%0.11%Year to Date01/01/201903/31/20190.76%0.65%0.11%Prior Month02/01/201902/28/20190.22%0.18%0.04%Prior Quarter10/01/201812/31/20180.61%0.61%-0.01%Prior Year01/01/201812/31/20182.02%1.92%0.10%Trailing Month03/01/201903/31/20190.25%0.24%0.00%Trailing Quarter01/01/201903/31/20190.76%0.65%0.11%Trailing Year04/01/201803/31/20192.47%2.26%0.21%AccountIndexIndex Start DateIndex End DateWC-Contra Costa CountyML 6 Month T-Bill01/01/198011/30/2004WC-Contra Costa CountyICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index12/01/2004---Performance Summary Grossof FeesBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 45 Gross of Fees (includes trading). Returns are actual and have not been annualized. No Tax Adjustment. Note that data will not exist prior to the performance inception date of: 04/01/2001. Historical data exists for the options shown below, only available on historical data boundaries: Reported Index Return is always Total Return.Begin Date,End DateReturn Type,Fee OptionsTax Options04/01/200101/31/2011Total ReturnGross of Fees, Net of FeesGross Down Method, Gross Up Method, No Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Income ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Price ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment01/01/200801/31/2011Book ReturnGross of Fees, Net of FeesGross Down Method, Gross Up Method, No Tax AdjustmentPerformance Summary Grossof FeesBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 46 PeriodPeriod BeginPeriod EndTotal Return, Net ofFeesWeighted AverageIndex ReturnExcess Total Return,Net of FeesMonth to Date03/01/201903/31/20190.24%0.24%-0.01%Quarter to Date01/01/201903/31/20190.73%0.65%0.08%Year to Date01/01/201903/31/20190.73%0.65%0.08%Prior Month02/01/201902/28/20190.21%0.18%0.03%Prior Quarter10/01/201812/31/20180.58%0.61%-0.04%Prior Year01/01/201812/31/20181.90%1.92%-0.02%Trailing Month03/01/201903/31/20190.24%0.24%-0.01%Trailing Quarter01/01/201903/31/20190.73%0.65%0.08%Trailing Year04/01/201803/31/20192.36%2.26%0.09%AccountIndexIndex Start DateIndex End DateWC-Contra Costa CountyML 6 Month T-Bill01/01/198011/30/2004WC-Contra Costa CountyICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill Index12/01/2004---Performance Summary Net ofFeesBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 47 Net of Fees (includes management and trading). Returns are actual and have not been annualized. No Tax Adjustment. Note that data will not exist prior to the performance inception date of: 04/01/2001. Historical data exists for the options shown below, only available on historical data boundaries: Reported Index Return is always Total Return.Begin Date,End DateReturn Type,Fee OptionsTax Options04/01/200101/31/2011Total ReturnGross of Fees, Net of FeesGross Down Method, Gross Up Method, No Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Income ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Price ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment01/01/200801/31/2011Book ReturnGross of Fees, Net of FeesGross Down Method, Gross Up Method, No Tax AdjustmentPerformance Summary Net ofFeesBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 48 Balance SheetWC-Contra Costa CountyAs of:12/31/201803/31/2019Book Value44,390,369.2144,400,083.52Accrued Balance147,886.70156,868.94Book Value + Accrued44,538,255.9144,556,952.46Net Unrealized Gain/Loss-41,115.6618,330.06Market Value + Accrued44,497,140.2544,575,282.52Income StatementWC-Contra Costa CountyBegin DateEnd Date01/01/201903/31/2019Net Amortization/AccretionIncome99,742.07Interest Income179,319.56Dividend Income0.00Foreign Tax Withheld Expense0.00Misc Income0.00Allowance Expense0.00Income Subtotal179,319.56Net Realized Gain/Loss-0.01Net Holding Gain/Loss0.00Impairment Loss0.00Net Gain/Loss-0.01Expense-12,996.52Net Income266,065.10Transfers In/Out-247,368.55Change in Unrealized Gain/Loss59,445.72GAAP FinancialsBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 49 Statement of Cash FlowsWC-Contra Costa CountyBegin DateEnd Date01/01/201903/31/2019Net Income266,065.10Amortization/Accretion on MS-83,342.95Change in Accrued on MS21,083.81Net Gain/Loss on MS0.01Change in Unrealized G/L on CE229.87Subtotal-62,029.27Purchase of MS-10,505,905.61Purchased Accrued of MS-30,066.05Sales of MS637,610.67Sold Accrued of MS0.00Maturities of MS8,064,000.00Net Purchases/Sales-1,834,360.99Transfers of Cash & CE-247,368.55Total Change in Cash & CE-1,877,693.71Beginning Cash & CE3,804,930.52Ending Cash & CE1,927,236.81GAAP FinancialsBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 50 Identifier,DescriptionEnding Base CurrentUnits,CouponEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityTransfers In/Out,Settle DateInterest/DividendIncome,Net Amortization/Accretion IncomeNet Realized Gain/LossBase Expense,Base Net Income010831DL6ALAMEDA CNTY CALIF JT PWRS AUTH LEASEREV500,000.002.4806/01/201906/01/20190.0004/24/20183,106.250.000.000.003,106.2502665WCL3AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP700,000.002.7902/21/202002/21/20200.0010/03/20182,116.69-52.870.000.002,063.8202665WCL3AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP0.002.7902/21/202002/21/20200.0010/03/20182,772.51-69.140.000.002,703.3702587AAJ3AMXCA 171 A500,000.001.9302/13/202002/18/20200.0005/25/20181,152.64494.260.000.001,646.9002587AAJ3AMXCA 171 A0.001.9302/13/202002/18/20200.0005/25/20181,259.87564.870.000.001,824.73037833DH0APPLE INC500,000.001.8011/13/201911/13/20190.0011/30/20182,250.001,379.740.000.003,629.7405522RCW6BACCT 171 A750,000.001.9503/15/202003/16/20200.0002/27/2019568.75222.590.000.00791.3405522RCW6BACCT 171 A0.001.9503/15/202003/16/20200.0002/27/2019812.50267.110.000.001,079.6106051GFE4BANK OF AMERICA CORP740,000.003.6704/01/201904/01/20190.0012/26/20186,775.70-1,290.380.000.005,485.3306406HCP2BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP0.002.1001/15/201901/15/20190.0008/03/2018490.0080.950.000.00570.9506406HCU1BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP250,000.002.2005/15/201905/15/20190.0001/25/20181,375.00-9.610.000.001,365.3905531FAS2BB&T CORP250,000.002.4501/15/202001/15/20200.0011/15/20181,293.06340.310.000.001,633.3605531FAS2BB&T CORP0.002.4501/15/202001/15/20200.0011/15/2018238.1962.690.000.00300.88084670BL1BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC700,000.002.1008/14/201908/14/20190.0005/22/20183,675.00739.440.000.004,414.4409247XAE1BLACKROCK INC700,000.005.0012/10/201912/10/20190.0006/08/20188,750.00-3,671.180.000.005,078.82055657AC4BMWLT 171 A3252,920.361.9806/19/201905/20/20200.0006/08/20181,580.17632.890.000.002,213.0605584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2A86,346.781.8005/13/201902/20/20200.0010/25/2017217.900.710.000.00218.6105584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2A0.001.8005/13/201902/20/20200.0010/25/2017375.921.630.000.00377.5507330NAL9BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO450,000.001.4505/10/201905/10/20190.0006/29/20181,631.251,333.290.000.002,964.54CCYUSDCash1.050.0003/31/201903/31/2019-247,368.55---0.000.000.00-12,996.52-12,996.5214912L6R7CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP700,000.001.3505/18/201905/18/20190.0004/17/20182,362.502,049.090.000.004,411.5917305EFS9CCCIT 14A6 A6400,000.002.1507/14/201907/15/20190.0005/23/20182,150.00524.820.000.002,674.82Income DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 51 Identifier,DescriptionEnding Base CurrentUnits,CouponEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityTransfers In/Out,Settle DateInterest/DividendIncome,Net Amortization/Accretion IncomeNet Realized Gain/LossBase Expense,Base Net Income17305EFW0CCCIT 16A1 A1450,000.001.7511/19/201911/19/20190.0004/26/20181,968.751,092.490.000.003,061.24161571FK5CHAIT 124 A475,000.001.5808/15/201908/15/20190.0004/19/20181,876.261,251.580.000.003,127.84161571HC1CHAIT 162 A300,000.001.3706/14/201906/17/20190.0001/26/20181,027.50590.790.000.001,618.29166764AR1CHEVRON CORP200,000.001.9603/03/202003/03/20200.0011/05/2018294.15155.620.000.00449.77166764AR1CHEVRON CORP0.001.9603/03/202003/03/20200.0011/05/2018686.35344.590.000.001,030.9417325FAN8CITIBANK NA700,000.003.0505/01/202005/01/20200.0003/22/2019533.75-47.410.000.00486.3417325FAB4CITIBANK NA0.003.1303/20/201903/20/20190.0003/20/20175,089.500.000.000.005,089.5014041NFC0COMET 161 A600,000.002.9304/15/201904/15/20190.0009/20/20174,409.31-534.720.000.003,874.5914041NFE6COMET 163 A250,000.001.3406/14/201906/17/20190.0005/24/2018837.51815.640.000.001,653.1514041NFF3COMET 164 A400,000.001.3308/15/201908/15/20190.0009/21/20181,329.991,371.950.000.002,701.9422546QAC1CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON NEW YORKBRANCH650,000.005.3008/13/201908/13/20190.0010/05/20188,612.50-3,892.500.000.004,720.0030231GAD4EXXON MOBIL CORP0.001.8203/15/201903/15/20190.0006/11/20181,776.06537.020.000.002,313.08313312EK2FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS1,000,000.000.0004/16/201904/16/20190.0004/16/20180.005,375.000.000.005,375.00313312LV0FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS1,000,000.000.0009/17/201909/17/20190.0009/25/20180.006,425.000.000.006,425.00313312NS5FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS1,000,000.000.0011/01/201911/01/20190.0011/13/20180.006,700.000.000.006,700.00313312NG1FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS500,000.000.0010/22/201910/22/20190.0010/23/20180.003,287.500.000.003,287.50313312QL7FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS1,000,000.000.0012/13/201912/13/20190.0012/14/20180.006,675.000.000.006,675.003133EFC70FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP0.001.1202/22/201902/22/20190.0008/17/20171,190.00294.960.000.001,484.963133EFLA3FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORP500,000.001.2410/22/201910/22/20190.0010/18/20181,550.001,797.560.000.003,347.563130AAE46FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.001.2501/16/201901/16/20190.0004/13/2018520.83352.880.000.00873.713130ACLX0FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,000.001.6310/30/201910/30/20190.0009/27/20182,031.251,314.500.000.003,345.75313384FR5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS2,000,000.000.0005/16/201905/16/20190.0001/17/20190.009,907.780.000.009,907.78Income DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 52 Identifier,DescriptionEnding Base CurrentUnits,CouponEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityTransfers In/Out,Settle DateInterest/DividendIncome,Net Amortization/Accretion IncomeNet Realized Gain/LossBase Expense,Base Net Income313370US5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.002.8809/11/202009/11/20200.0003/22/2019718.75-98.340.000.00620.413130ABF92FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.001.3805/28/201905/28/20190.0004/16/20183,437.502,056.510.000.005,494.01313384FV6FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.000.0005/20/201905/20/20190.0011/20/20180.006,125.000.000.006,125.00313384CY3FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.000.0003/12/201903/12/20190.0012/18/20180.003,485.420.000.003,485.42313384LA5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.000.0008/29/201908/29/20190.0012/06/20180.006,550.000.000.006,550.00313384EC9FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.000.0004/09/201904/09/20190.0002/01/20190.003,933.340.000.003,933.343134G92B2FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP0.000.9501/30/201901/30/20190.0005/01/2018382.64532.740.000.00915.383134G92B2FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP0.000.9501/30/201901/30/20190.0005/16/2018382.64507.220.000.00889.86313396AT0FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP0.000.0001/18/201901/18/20190.0009/06/20180.00913.750.000.00913.753134G9Q75FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP500,000.001.2507/26/201907/26/20190.0005/07/20181,562.501,365.170.000.002,927.6731680GAD8FITAT 151 A30.001.4201/15/201903/16/20200.0011/13/20175.640.340.000.005.98369550BA5GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP250,000.002.8805/11/202005/11/20200.0009/14/20181,796.8856.530.000.001,853.40369550BA5GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP500,000.002.8805/11/202005/11/20200.0003/21/2019399.31-32.180.000.00367.13438124AC3HAROT 163 A376,769.421.1606/04/201905/18/20200.0001/25/2018306.15218.82-0.010.00524.9743815HAB3HAROT 183 A2658,963.862.6709/03/201912/21/20200.0002/28/20191,714.51-13.370.000.001,701.14438516BP0HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC500,000.002.7910/30/201910/30/20190.0003/14/2019697.62-17.880.000.00679.7440428HPN6HSBC USA INC (NEW)500,000.002.3811/13/201911/13/20190.0010/10/20182,968.75774.810.000.003,743.5645818WAV8INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK0.002.4801/15/201901/15/20190.0004/17/2018481.50-18.860.000.00462.644581X0CH9INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK1,000,000.001.7510/15/201910/15/20190.0009/17/20184,375.002,269.470.000.006,644.47459058FC2INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPM500,000.001.2504/26/201904/26/20190.0010/13/20171,562.50411.430.000.001,973.93459058FC2INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPM300,000.001.2504/26/201904/26/20190.0008/29/2018937.50911.250.000.001,848.75Income DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 53 Identifier,DescriptionEnding Base CurrentUnits,CouponEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityTransfers In/Out,Settle DateInterest/DividendIncome,Net Amortization/Accretion IncomeNet Realized Gain/LossBase Expense,Base Net Income459058FK4INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPM500,000.000.8808/15/201908/15/20190.0002/01/2019731.671,412.970.000.002,144.6445905UK60INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPM500,000.002.6407/19/201907/19/20190.0001/10/20192,920.4163.950.000.002,984.3647788CAB8JDOT 2018 A295,097.292.4207/07/201910/15/20200.0002/28/2018703.351.620.000.00704.9624422ERR2JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP700,000.002.2504/17/201904/17/20190.0003/14/20183,937.50388.420.000.004,325.9246625HQU7JPMORGAN CHASE & CO0.001.8503/22/201903/22/20190.0010/25/20172,913.756.550.000.002,920.3048306BP66Kaiser Foundation Hospitals0.000.0002/06/201902/06/20190.0012/06/20180.002,000.000.000.002,000.0048306BR31Kaiser Foundation Hospitals800,000.000.0004/03/201904/03/20190.0002/06/20190.003,000.000.000.003,000.00544351MK2LOS ANGELES CALIF750,000.004.0009/01/201909/01/20190.0007/12/20187,500.00-2,614.000.000.004,885.9957636QAA2MASTERCARD INC500,000.002.0004/01/201904/01/20190.0005/04/20182,500.00563.860.000.003,063.8658769DAB6MBALT 17A A2A0.001.5301/15/201908/15/20190.0004/26/20177.730.000.000.007.7358772RAB0MBART 181 A2A495,883.692.7109/03/201904/15/20210.0007/25/20183,788.035.000.000.003,793.0365478GAD2NAROT 17B A3450,000.001.7501/06/202010/15/20210.0004/26/20181,968.751,005.500.000.002,974.2565478GAD2NAROT 17B A3300,000.001.7501/06/202010/15/20210.0011/08/20181,312.50567.450.000.001,879.95637432MX0NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOP FINANCECORP0.002.1502/01/201902/01/20190.0003/22/2018806.25176.140.000.00982.3963763QN37National Securities Clearing Corporation0.000.0001/03/201901/03/20190.0011/16/20180.0066.110.000.0066.1163763QQT7National Securities Clearing Corporation0.000.0003/27/201903/27/20190.0002/05/20190.001,694.440.000.001,694.4463763QP50National Securities Clearing Corporation0.000.0002/05/201902/05/20190.0001/03/20190.00721.260.000.00721.2667983UUR2Old Line Funding, LLC1,000,000.000.0007/25/201907/25/20190.0001/25/20190.004,968.330.000.004,968.3369371RM78PACCAR INC700,000.002.5008/14/202008/14/20200.0003/29/201997.22-0.830.000.0096.3969353RCH9PNC BANK NA0.002.2001/28/201901/28/20190.0001/31/20181,237.500.000.000.001,237.5069353RFD5PNC BANK NA680,000.003.0404/19/202005/19/20200.0002/06/20193,093.20-155.100.000.002,938.11Income DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 54 Identifier,DescriptionEnding Base CurrentUnits,CouponEffectiveMaturity,Final MaturityTransfers In/Out,Settle DateInterest/DividendIncome,Net Amortization/Accretion IncomeNet Realized Gain/LossBase Expense,Base Net IncomeCCYUSDReceivable874.250.0003/31/201903/31/20190.00---0.000.000.000.000.0078607QAT2SACRAMENTO CALIF SUBN WTR DIST REV500,000.002.7111/01/201911/01/20190.0005/30/20183,390.000.000.000.003,390.00797669XS2SAN FRANCISCO CALIF BAY AREA RAPID TRANDIST SALES750,000.002.0107/01/201907/01/20190.0012/28/20173,770.630.000.000.003,770.6379766DKL2SAN FRANCISCO CALIF CITY & CNTY ARPTSCOMMN INTL A750,000.001.7205/01/201905/01/20190.0010/31/20173,226.880.000.000.003,226.88798170AB2SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY OF TH150,000.002.1008/01/201908/01/20190.0001/29/2018786.7573.280.000.00860.0389237WAD9TAOT 16C A3110,109.921.1406/26/201908/17/20200.0009/13/2017391.37131.570.000.00522.9409702MNP4The Boeing Company0.000.0001/23/201901/23/20190.0011/21/20180.00739.440.000.00739.4488602UN89Thunder Bay Funding, LLC0.000.0001/08/201901/08/20190.0010/22/20180.00382.670.000.00382.6788602UNF3Thunder Bay Funding, LLC0.000.0001/15/201901/15/20190.0001/08/20190.00376.440.000.00376.4489236TBB0TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP0.002.1001/17/201901/17/20190.0004/26/2018176.4028.990.000.00205.39912828U32UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.001.0011/15/201911/15/20190.0001/17/20192,044.203,129.920.000.005,174.12912828U73UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.001.3812/15/201912/15/20190.0011/28/20183,399.733,349.970.000.006,749.699128282K5UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.001.3807/31/201907/31/20190.0010/10/20173,399.93309.420.000.003,709.3590331HNK5US BANK NA700,000.002.9012/17/201901/17/20200.0001/23/20184,170.530.000.000.004,170.5390331HNK5US BANK NA0.002.9012/17/201901/17/20200.0001/23/2018800.740.000.000.00800.7490290AAB3USAOT 171 A20.001.5401/15/201902/18/20200.0009/20/201711.620.010.000.0011.6392868LAB7VALET 181 A2A682,494.562.8110/17/201907/20/20210.0007/03/20185,168.291.090.010.005,169.3992348XAB1VZOT 18A A1B800,000.002.7304/21/202104/20/20230.0010/10/20185,456.370.000.000.005,456.37931142EF6WALMART INC700,000.002.6406/23/202006/23/20200.0006/27/20184,909.080.000.000.004,909.0894975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF127,190.062.3803/31/201903/31/20190.00---4,282.190.000.000.004,282.19------44,531,651.231.7009/29/201911/22/2019-247,368.55---179,319.5699,742.07-0.01-12,996.52266,065.10Income DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 55 * Weighted by: Ending Base Market Value + Accrued. * Holdings Displayed by: Lot.Income DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 56 CESTIdentifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinalMaturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF127,190.061.000003/31/20192.3803/31/2019 AAACash2.432.43127,190.06127,190.060.00127,190.060.00127,190.06CCYUSDCash1.051.000003/31/20190.0003/31/2019 AAACash0.000.001.051.050.001.050.001.05CCYUSDReceivable874.251.000003/31/20190.0003/31/2019 AAACash0.000.00874.25874.250.00874.250.00874.25313384EC9FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.0099.946204/09/20190.0004/09/2019 A-1+Agency2.421.76995,533.33999,466.67-4.67999,462.000.00999,462.0048306BR31Kaiser Foundation Hospitals800,000.0099.963704/03/20190.0004/03/2019 A-1+Industrial2.523.27796,888.89799,888.89-179.44799,709.450.00799,709.45------1,928,065.3693.378504/06/20190.1604/06/2019 AAA---2.462.431,920,487.581,927,420.92-184.111,927,236.810.001,927,236.81Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinalMaturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued22546QAC1CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON NEW YORKBRANCH650,000.00100.898608/13/20195.3008/13/2019 A+Financial2.822.97663,494.00655,795.5045.40655,840.904,593.33660,434.2309247XAE1BLACKROCK INC700,000.00101.584612/10/20195.0012/10/2019 AA-Financial2.812.69722,435.00710,320.10772.10711,092.2010,791.67721,883.8724422ERR2JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP700,000.0099.982204/17/20192.2504/17/2019 AIndustrial2.482.58698,278.00699,930.95-55.55699,875.407,175.00707,050.40161571FK5CHAIT 124 A475,000.0099.614608/15/20191.5808/15/2019 AAAAsset Backed2.672.62468,283.20473,108.7360.53473,169.26333.56473,502.8106051GFE4BANK OF AMERICA CORP740,000.00100.000004/01/20193.6704/01/2019 A+Financial2.943.63741,376.40740,000.000.00740,000.006,708.57746,708.5757636QAA2MASTERCARD INC500,000.00100.000004/01/20192.0004/01/2019 A+Industrial2.461.98497,920.00500,000.000.00500,000.005,000.00505,000.00Balance Sheet ClassificationBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 57 Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinalMaturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued06406HCU1BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP250,000.0099.933605/15/20192.2005/15/2019 AA-Financial2.182.70250,047.50250,001.49-167.49249,834.002,077.78251,911.7817305EFS9CCCIT 14A6 A6400,000.0099.860007/15/20192.1507/14/2019 AAAAsset Backed2.682.63397,562.50399,387.7152.29399,440.001,815.56401,255.56084670BL1BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC700,000.0099.788908/14/20192.1008/14/2019 AAFinancial2.542.66696,311.00698,890.84-368.54698,522.301,919.17700,441.4740428HPN6HSBC USA INC (NEW)500,000.0099.746811/13/20192.3811/13/2019 AA-Financial3.022.79496,565.00498,054.36679.64498,734.004,552.08503,286.0805531FAS2BB&T CORP250,000.0099.798701/15/20202.4501/15/2020 A+Financial3.122.71248,092.50248,705.94790.81249,496.751,293.06250,789.81166764AR1CHEVRON CORP200,000.0099.339803/03/20201.9603/03/2020 AAIndustrial3.002.69197,310.00198,127.00552.60198,679.60305.04198,984.643133EFLA3FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP500,000.0099.390010/22/20191.2410/22/2019 AAAAgency2.732.33492,630.00495,925.531,024.47496,950.002,738.33499,688.33459058FC2INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM500,000.0099.906904/26/20191.2504/26/2019 AAAGovernment1.592.48497,440.00499,885.71-351.21499,534.502,690.97502,225.47459058FC2INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM300,000.0099.906904/26/20191.2504/26/2019 AAAGovernment2.502.48297,570.00299,746.88-26.18299,720.701,614.58301,335.2807330NAL9BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO450,000.0099.872005/10/20191.4505/10/2019 A+Financial2.672.56445,333.50449,422.241.76449,424.002,555.63451,979.6314041NFC0COMET 161 A600,000.00100.014104/15/20192.9304/15/2019 AAAAsset Backed2.592.56603,398.44600,083.181.42600,084.60831.23600,915.8314912L6R7CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP700,000.0099.826905/18/20191.3505/18/2019 AIndustrial2.562.51690,984.00698,929.92-141.62698,788.303,491.25702,279.55161571HC1CHAIT 162 A300,000.0099.737206/17/20191.3706/14/2019 AAAAsset Backed2.182.67296,671.88299,494.55-282.92299,211.63182.67299,394.30459058FK4INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM500,000.0099.388508/15/20190.8808/15/2019 AAAGovernment2.632.51495,330.00496,742.97199.53496,942.50559.03497,501.533134G9Q75FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP500,000.0099.592007/26/20191.2507/26/2019 AAAAgency2.382.51493,250.00498,240.45-280.45497,960.001,128.47499,088.47Balance Sheet ClassificationBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 58 Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinalMaturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued14041NFE6COMET 163 A250,000.0099.723606/17/20191.3406/14/2019 AAAAsset Backed2.682.73246,474.61249,302.176.90249,309.08148.89249,457.9614041NFF3COMET 164 A400,000.0099.530308/15/20191.3308/15/2019 AAAAsset Backed2.752.60395,000.00397,926.83194.45398,121.28236.44398,357.72912828U32UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.0099.097711/15/20191.0011/15/2019 AAAGovernment2.572.45987,226.56990,356.48620.52990,977.003,784.53994,761.5317305EFW0CCCIT 16A1 A1450,000.0099.445511/19/20191.7511/19/2019 AAAAsset Backed2.752.63443,056.64447,183.81320.80447,504.612,887.50450,392.11912828U73UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.0099.257812/15/20191.3812/15/2019 AAAGovernment2.762.43985,781.25990,396.762,181.24992,578.004,041.90996,619.9002587AAJ3AMXCA 171 A500,000.0099.391702/18/20201.9302/13/2020 AAAAsset Backed2.822.63492,539.06496,198.92759.38496,958.30428.89497,387.1905522RCW6BACCT 171 A750,000.0099.386003/16/20201.9503/15/2020 AAAAsset Backed2.702.61744,316.41744,806.12589.11745,395.22650.00746,045.223130ABF92FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.0099.831505/28/20191.3805/28/2019 AAAAgency2.222.40990,700.00998,697.54-382.54998,315.004,697.921,003,012.929128282K5UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.0099.632807/31/20191.3807/31/2019 AAAGovernment1.502.45997,734.38999,584.01-3,256.01996,328.002,279.01998,607.013130ACLX0FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,000.0099.505310/30/20191.6310/30/2019 AAAAgency2.712.48494,187.00496,903.63622.87497,526.503,407.99500,934.4979766DKL2SAN FRANCISCO CALIF CITY & CNTY ARPTSCOMMN INTL A750,000.0099.937005/01/20191.7205/01/2019 A+Municipal1.722.46750,000.00750,000.00-472.50749,527.505,378.13754,905.6305584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2A86,346.7899.903302/20/20201.8005/13/2019 AAAAsset Backed1.812.6086,339.2486,346.14-82.8486,263.3047.4986,310.79438516BP0HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC500,000.00100.016610/30/20192.7910/30/2019 AIndustrial2.752.73500,228.50500,210.62-127.62500,083.002,364.17502,447.17037833DH0APPLE INC500,000.0099.681911/13/20191.8011/13/2019 AA+Industrial2.942.32494,665.00496,535.321,874.18498,409.503,450.00501,859.50798170AB2SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THEREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TH150,000.0099.835008/01/20192.1008/01/2019 AAMunicipal2.302.61149,553.00149,900.67-148.17149,752.50524.50150,277.00Balance Sheet ClassificationBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 59 Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinalMaturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued797669XS2SAN FRANCISCO CALIF BAY AREA RAPIDTRAN DIST SALES750,000.0099.875007/01/20192.0107/01/2019 AA+Municipal2.012.53750,000.00750,000.00-937.50749,062.503,770.63752,833.134581X0CH9INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK1,000,000.0099.609810/15/20191.7510/15/2019 AAAGovernment2.692.48990,090.00995,032.391,065.61996,098.008,069.441,004,167.4490331HNK5US BANK NA700,000.00100.034501/17/20202.9012/17/2019 AA-Financial2.952.80700,000.00700,000.00241.50700,241.504,170.53704,412.03010831DL6ALAMEDA CNTY CALIF JT PWRS AUTH LEASEREV500,000.0099.993006/01/20192.4806/01/2019 AA+Municipal2.492.54500,000.00500,000.00-35.00499,965.004,141.67504,106.67313312EK2FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS1,000,000.0099.899204/16/20190.0004/16/2019 A-1+Agency2.192.02978,201.39999,104.17-112.17998,992.000.00998,992.0078607QAT2SACRAMENTO CALIF SUBN WTR DIST REV500,000.00100.001011/01/20192.7111/01/2019 AA+Municipal2.712.72500,000.00500,000.005.00500,005.005,650.00505,655.0045905UK60INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM500,000.0099.991207/19/20192.6407/19/2019 AAAGovernment2.722.47499,850.00499,913.9542.05499,956.002,530.96502,486.96544351MK2LOS ANGELES CALIF750,000.00100.602009/01/20194.0009/01/2019 AAMunicipal2.552.57762,082.50754,443.8071.20754,515.002,500.00757,015.0002665WCL3AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP700,000.00100.071502/21/20202.7902/21/2020 AIndustrial2.772.80700,686.00700,441.9758.53700,500.502,116.70702,617.20313312LV0FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS1,000,000.0098.868609/17/20190.0009/17/2019 A-1+Agency2.622.40974,514.17987,935.28750.72988,686.000.00988,686.00313312NG1FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS500,000.0098.640010/22/20190.0010/22/2019 A-1+Agency2.682.40486,703.89492,548.33651.67493,200.000.00493,200.00313312NS5FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS1,000,000.0098.579311/01/20190.0011/01/2019 A-1+Agency2.732.45973,721.11984,068.891,724.11985,793.000.00985,793.00313384FV6FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.0099.670605/20/20190.0005/20/2019 A-1+Agency2.482.29987,681.94996,665.2840.72996,706.000.00996,706.00313384LA5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.0098.995808/29/20190.0008/29/2019 A-1+Agency2.662.47980,641.11989,083.33874.67989,958.000.00989,958.00313312QL7FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS1,000,000.0098.307612/13/20190.0012/13/2019 A-1+Agency2.732.46973,003.33981,013.332,062.67983,076.000.00983,076.00Balance Sheet ClassificationBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 60 LTIdentifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinalMaturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued313384FR5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS2,000,000.0099.697505/16/20190.0005/16/2019 A-1+Agency2.432.281,984,067.221,993,975.00-25.001,993,950.000.001,993,950.0067983UUR2Old Line Funding, LLC1,000,000.0099.174707/25/20190.0007/25/2019 A-1+Financial2.742.58986,374.72991,343.05403.51991,746.560.00991,746.56------34,151,346.7899.657408/22/20191.5508/21/2019 AA+---2.552.5333,875,701.9534,020,711.8312,088.6634,032,800.49129,634.2434,162,434.73Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinalMaturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued313370US5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.00100.661509/11/20202.8809/11/2020 AAAAgency2.512.411,005,300.421,005,202.081,412.921,006,615.001,597.221,008,212.2269371RM78PACCAR INC700,000.0099.998508/14/20202.5008/14/2020 A+Industrial2.482.50700,140.00700,139.17-149.67699,989.502,284.72702,274.2289237WAD9TAOT 16C A3110,109.9299.611408/17/20201.1406/26/2019 AAAAsset Backed1.582.76109,645.39109,976.36-294.34109,682.0255.79109,737.81438124AC3HAROT 163 A376,769.4299.673705/18/20201.1606/04/2019 AAAAsset Backed2.352.9676,283.6176,650.95-132.0576,518.9132.1676,551.06055657AC4BMWLT 171 A3252,920.3699.840505/20/20201.9806/19/2019 AAAAsset Backed3.062.73251,359.36252,417.8598.98252,516.82153.02252,669.8469353RFD5PNC BANK NA680,000.00100.194005/19/20203.0404/19/2020 A+Financial2.932.87681,258.00681,102.90216.30681,319.202,356.54683,675.7465478GAD2NAROT 17B A3450,000.0099.205710/15/20211.7501/06/2020 AAAAsset Backed2.982.81442,212.89444,873.811,551.88446,425.70350.00446,775.7065478GAD2NAROT 17B A3300,000.0099.205710/15/20211.7501/06/2020 AAAAsset Backed3.092.81295,464.84296,282.191,334.94297,617.13233.33297,850.4647788CAB8JDOT 2018 A295,097.2999.913610/15/20202.4207/07/2019 AAAAsset Backed2.442.7695,093.1395,095.77-80.6195,015.16102.2895,117.4417325FAN8CITIBANK NA700,000.00100.331905/01/20203.0505/01/2020 AA-Financial2.792.71701,925.00701,877.59445.71702,323.308,895.83711,219.13Balance Sheet ClassificationBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 61 Summary * Grouped by: BS Class 2. * Groups Sorted by: BS Class 2. * Weighted by: Base Market Value + Accrued, except Book Yield by Base Book Value + Accrued. * HoldingsDisplayed by: Lot.Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinalMaturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued369550BA5GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP250,000.00100.331005/11/20202.8805/11/2020 A+Industrial2.972.57249,620.00249,744.991,082.51250,827.502,795.14253,622.64369550BA5GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP500,000.00100.331005/11/20202.8805/11/2020 A+Industrial2.652.57501,220.00501,187.82467.18501,655.005,590.28507,245.28931142EF6WALMART INC700,000.0099.988006/23/20202.6406/23/2020 AAIndustrial2.692.68700,000.00700,000.00-84.00699,916.00389.79700,305.7992868LAB7VALET 181 A2A682,494.56100.065807/20/20212.8110/17/2019 AAAAsset Backed2.832.71682,488.96682,490.99452.71682,943.71586.00683,529.7058772RAB0MBART 181 A2A495,883.69100.030904/15/20212.7109/03/2019 AAAAsset Backed2.732.65495,866.98495,873.61163.11496,036.72597.26496,633.9843815HAB3HAROT 183 A2658,963.86100.025912/21/20202.6709/03/2019 AAAAsset Backed2.662.62659,041.08659,034.6999.77659,134.47488.73659,623.2092348XAB1VZOT 18A A1B800,000.0099.980004/20/20232.7304/21/2021 AAAAsset Backed2.742.65800,000.00800,000.00-159.84799,840.16726.60800,566.76------8,452,239.09100.074501/15/20212.6404/15/2020 AA+---2.722.658,446,919.678,451,950.786,425.518,458,376.2827,234.708,485,610.98Identifier,DescriptionBase Current Units,Market PriceFinalMaturity,CouponEffectiveMaturityRating,Market SectorBook Yield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book Value,Base Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossBase Market Value,Base Accrued Balance,Base Market Value +Accrued------44,531,651.2399.465311/22/20191.7009/29/2019 AA+---2.582.5544,243,109.2044,400,083.5218,330.0644,418,413.58156,868.9444,575,282.52Balance Sheet ClassificationBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 62 * Does not Lock Down.BuyTrade Date,Settle DateIdentifier,DescriptionBroker/Dealer,Final Maturity,Coupon RateBase Original Units,Base Current Units,PricePurchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase Net TotalRealized Gain,Base Accrued InterestBase Commission,Base Amount02/25/201902/27/201905522RCW6BACCT 171 ATORONTO DOMINION BK03/16/20201.95750,000.00750,000.0099.240.00744,316.410.00487.500.00-744,803.9103/20/201903/22/201917325FAN8CITIBANK NAJ.P. Morgan Securities Inc. (AU)05/01/20203.05700,000.00700,000.00100.270.00701,925.000.008,362.080.00-710,287.0803/20/201903/22/2019313370US5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSFIRST TENNESSEE BANK N A BOND09/11/20202.881,000,000.001,000,000.00100.530.001,005,300.420.00878.470.00-1,006,178.8902/01/201902/01/2019313384EC9FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAPX Asset04/09/20190.001,000,000.001,000,000.0099.550.00995,533.330.000.000.00-995,533.3301/17/201901/17/2019313384FR5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSFIRST TENNESSEE BANK N A BOND05/16/20190.002,000,000.002,000,000.0099.200.001,984,067.220.000.000.00-1,984,067.2203/19/201903/21/2019369550BA5GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPPiper Jaffray Inc05/11/20202.88500,000.00500,000.00100.240.00501,220.000.005,190.970.00-506,410.9702/26/201902/28/201943815HAB3HAROT 183 A2TORONTO DOMINION BK12/21/20202.67775,000.00718,584.57100.010.00718,668.780.00373.070.00-719,041.8503/12/201903/14/2019438516BP0HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INCCastleOak Securities LP10/30/20192.79500,000.00500,000.00100.050.00500,228.500.001,666.550.00-501,895.0501/30/201902/01/2019459058FK4INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMTORONTO DOMINION BK08/15/20190.88500,000.00500,000.0099.070.00495,330.000.002,017.360.00-497,347.3601/08/201901/10/201945905UK60INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMCastleOak Securities LP07/19/20192.33500,000.00500,000.0099.970.00499,850.000.002,685.550.00-502,535.5502/06/201902/06/201948306BR31Kaiser Foundation HospitalsBARCLAYS CAPITAL INC.04/03/20190.00800,000.00800,000.0099.610.00796,888.890.000.000.00-796,888.8901/03/201901/03/201963763QP50National Securities ClearingCorporationRBC CAPITAL MARKETS02/05/20190.00311,000.00311,000.0099.770.00310,278.740.000.000.00-310,278.7402/05/201902/05/201963763QQT7National Securities ClearingCorporationDain Rauscher03/27/20190.00500,000.00500,000.0099.660.00498,305.560.000.000.00-498,305.5601/24/201901/25/201967983UUR2Old Line Funding, LLCAPX Asset07/25/20190.001,000,000.001,000,000.0098.640.00986,374.720.000.000.00-986,374.72Trading ActivityBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 63 Trade Date,Settle DateIdentifier,DescriptionBroker/Dealer,Final Maturity,Coupon RateBase Original Units,Base Current Units,PricePurchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase Net TotalRealized Gain,Base Accrued InterestBase Commission,Base Amount02/04/201902/06/201969353RFD5PNC BANK NATORONTO DOMINION BK05/19/20203.00680,000.00680,000.00100.190.00681,258.000.004,476.670.00-685,734.6703/27/201903/29/201969371RM78PACCAR INCPiper Jaffray Inc08/14/20202.50700,000.00700,000.00100.020.00700,140.000.002,187.500.00-702,327.5001/08/201901/08/201988602UNF3Thunder Bay Funding, LLCDain Rauscher01/15/20190.00800,000.00800,000.0099.950.00799,623.560.000.000.00-799,623.5601/16/201901/17/2019912828U32UNITED STATES TREASURYBank of Montreal, Primary Broker11/15/20191.001,000,000.001,000,000.0098.720.00987,226.560.001,740.330.00-988,966.8901/02/201901/02/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3315,547.1515,547.151.0015,547.1515,547.150.000.000.00-15,547.1501/03/201901/03/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33500,000.00500,000.001.00500,000.00500,000.000.000.000.00-500,000.0001/08/201901/08/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33800,000.00800,000.001.00800,000.00800,000.000.000.000.00-800,000.0001/15/201901/15/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.331,965,541.991,965,541.991.001,965,541.991,965,541.990.000.000.00-1,965,541.9901/15/201901/15/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.333,165.003,165.001.003,165.003,165.000.000.000.00-3,165.0001/15/201901/15/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33342.50342.501.00342.50342.500.000.000.00-342.5001/15/201901/15/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3320,424.3920,424.391.0020,424.3920,424.390.000.000.00-20,424.3901/16/201901/16/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.331,025,961.121,025,961.121.001,025,961.121,025,961.120.000.000.00-1,025,961.1201/18/201901/18/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3323,690.0123,690.011.0023,690.0123,690.010.000.000.00-23,690.0101/18/201901/18/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33904,604.26904,604.261.00904,604.26904,604.260.000.000.00-904,604.2601/22/201901/22/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3327,670.2127,670.211.0027,670.2127,670.210.000.000.00-27,670.2101/22/201901/22/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3343,753.6043,753.601.0043,753.6043,753.600.000.000.00-43,753.60Trading ActivityBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 64 Trade Date,Settle DateIdentifier,DescriptionBroker/Dealer,Final Maturity,Coupon RateBase Original Units,Base Current Units,PricePurchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase Net TotalRealized Gain,Base Accrued InterestBase Commission,Base Amount01/23/201901/23/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33503,075.00503,075.001.00503,075.00503,075.000.000.000.00-503,075.0001/28/201901/28/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33761,375.00761,375.001.00761,375.00761,375.000.000.000.00-761,375.0001/30/201901/30/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.331,004,750.001,004,750.001.001,004,750.001,004,750.000.000.000.00-1,004,750.0001/31/201901/31/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.336,875.006,875.001.006,875.006,875.000.000.000.00-6,875.0002/05/201902/05/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33311,000.00311,000.001.00311,000.00311,000.000.000.000.00-311,000.0002/06/201902/06/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33114,265.33114,265.331.00114,265.33114,265.330.000.000.00-114,265.3302/13/201902/13/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3317,225.0017,225.001.0017,225.0017,225.000.000.000.00-17,225.0002/14/201902/14/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.337,350.007,350.001.007,350.007,350.000.000.000.00-7,350.0002/15/201902/15/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.332,190.002,190.001.002,190.002,190.000.000.000.00-2,190.0002/15/201902/15/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3337,819.4237,819.421.0037,819.4237,819.420.000.000.00-37,819.4202/19/201902/19/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.337,365.427,365.421.007,365.427,365.420.000.000.00-7,365.4202/19/201902/19/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3355,996.6455,996.641.0055,996.6455,996.640.000.000.00-55,996.6402/19/201902/19/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3319,269.6819,269.681.0019,269.6819,269.680.000.000.00-19,269.6802/20/201902/20/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3329,414.4629,414.461.0029,414.4629,414.460.000.000.00-29,414.4602/20/201902/20/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3340,099.0640,099.061.0040,099.0640,099.060.000.000.00-40,099.0602/21/201902/21/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3319,906.9519,906.951.0019,906.9519,906.950.000.000.00-19,906.95Trading ActivityBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 65 MaturityTrade Date,Settle DateIdentifier,DescriptionBroker/Dealer,Final Maturity,Coupon RateBase Original Units,Base Current Units,PricePurchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase Net TotalRealized Gain,Base Accrued InterestBase Commission,Base Amount02/21/201902/21/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.335,001.395,001.391.005,001.395,001.390.000.000.00-5,001.3902/22/201902/22/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33754,200.00754,200.001.00754,200.00754,200.000.000.000.00-754,200.0003/01/201903/01/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3820,607.2920,607.291.0020,607.2920,607.290.000.000.00-20,607.2903/04/201903/04/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.381,961.001,961.001.001,961.001,961.000.000.000.00-1,961.0003/12/201903/12/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.38750,000.00750,000.001.00750,000.00750,000.000.000.000.00-750,000.0003/15/201903/15/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3858,415.8458,415.841.0058,415.8458,415.840.000.000.00-58,415.8403/15/201903/15/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.38501,834.15501,834.151.00501,834.15501,834.150.000.000.00-501,834.1503/15/201903/15/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.38342.50342.501.00342.50342.500.000.000.00-342.5003/18/201903/18/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3818,968.2118,968.211.0018,968.2118,968.210.000.000.00-18,968.2103/20/201903/20/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.38787,782.62787,782.621.00787,782.62787,782.620.000.000.00-787,782.6203/20/201903/20/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.3827,429.6327,429.631.0027,429.6327,429.630.000.000.00-27,429.6303/25/201903/25/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.385,011.565,011.561.005,011.565,011.560.000.000.00-5,011.5603/27/201903/27/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.38500,000.00500,000.001.00500,000.00500,000.000.000.000.00-500,000.00---------------07/25/20191.7625,716,231.3825,659,815.95---11,700,231.3825,606,767.070.0030,066.050.00-25,636,833.12Trading ActivityBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 66 Trade Date,Settle DateIdentifier,DescriptionBroker/Dealer,Final Maturity,Coupon RateBase Original Units,Base Current Units,PricePurchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase Net TotalRealized Gain,Base Accrued InterestBase Commission,Base Amount01/15/201901/15/201906406HCP2BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPMaturity01/15/20192.10-600,000.00-600,000.00100.000.00-600,000.000.000.000.00600,000.0001/23/201901/23/201909702MNP4The Boeing CompanyMaturity01/23/20190.00-500,000.00-500,000.00100.000.00-500,000.000.000.000.00500,000.0003/20/201903/20/201917325FAB4CITIBANK NAMaturity03/20/20193.13-750,000.00-750,000.00100.000.00-750,000.000.000.000.00750,000.0003/15/201903/15/201930231GAD4EXXON MOBIL CORPMaturity03/15/20191.82-475,000.00-475,000.00100.000.00-475,000.000.000.000.00475,000.0001/16/201901/16/20193130AAE46FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSMaturity01/16/20191.25-1,000,000.00-1,000,000.00100.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.000.001,000,000.0003/12/201903/12/2019313384CY3FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSMaturity03/12/20190.00-750,000.00-750,000.00100.000.00-750,000.000.000.000.00750,000.0001/18/201901/18/2019313396AT0FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPMaturity01/18/20190.00-900,000.00-900,000.00100.000.00-900,000.000.000.000.00900,000.0002/22/201902/22/20193133EFC70FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORPMaturity02/22/20191.12-750,000.00-750,000.00100.000.00-750,000.000.000.000.00750,000.0001/30/201901/30/20193134G92B2FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPMaturity01/30/20190.95-500,000.00-500,000.00100.000.00-500,000.000.000.000.00500,000.0001/30/201901/30/20193134G92B2FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGECORPMaturity01/30/20190.95-500,000.00-500,000.00100.000.00-500,000.000.000.000.00500,000.0001/15/201901/15/201945818WAV8INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENTBANKMaturity01/15/20192.48-500,000.00-500,000.00100.000.00-500,000.000.000.000.00500,000.0003/22/201903/22/201946625HQU7JPMORGAN CHASE & COMaturity03/22/20191.85-700,000.00-700,000.00100.000.00-700,000.000.000.000.00700,000.0002/06/201902/06/201948306BP66Kaiser Foundation HospitalsMaturity02/06/20190.00-800,000.00-800,000.00100.000.00-800,000.000.000.000.00800,000.0002/01/201902/01/2019637432MX0NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPFINANCE CORPMaturity02/01/20192.15-450,000.00-450,000.00100.000.00-450,000.000.000.000.00450,000.0001/03/201901/03/201963763QN37National Securities ClearingCorporationMaturity01/03/20190.00-500,000.00-500,000.00100.000.00-500,000.000.000.000.00500,000.0002/05/201902/05/201963763QP50National Securities ClearingCorporationMaturity02/05/20190.00-311,000.00-311,000.00100.000.00-311,000.000.000.000.00311,000.00Trading ActivityBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 67 Principal PaydownTrade Date,Settle DateIdentifier,DescriptionBroker/Dealer,Final Maturity,Coupon RateBase Original Units,Base Current Units,PricePurchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase Net TotalRealized Gain,Base Accrued InterestBase Commission,Base Amount03/27/201903/27/201963763QQT7National Securities ClearingCorporationMaturity03/27/20190.00-500,000.00-500,000.00100.000.00-500,000.000.000.000.00500,000.0001/28/201901/28/201969353RCH9PNC BANK NAMaturity01/28/20192.20-750,000.00-750,000.00100.000.00-750,000.000.000.000.00750,000.0001/08/201901/08/201988602UN89Thunder Bay Funding, LLCMaturity01/08/20190.00-800,000.00-800,000.00100.000.00-800,000.000.000.000.00800,000.0001/15/201901/15/201988602UNF3Thunder Bay Funding, LLCMaturity01/15/20190.00-800,000.00-800,000.00100.000.00-800,000.000.000.000.00800,000.0001/17/201901/17/201989236TBB0TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPMaturity01/17/20192.10-189,000.00-189,000.00100.000.00-189,000.000.000.000.00189,000.00------------Maturity02/06/20191.00-13,025,000.00-13,025,000.00100.000.00-13,025,000.000.000.000.0013,025,000.00Trade Date,Settle DateIdentifier,DescriptionBroker/Dealer,Final Maturity,Coupon RateBase Original Units,Base Current Units,PricePurchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase Net TotalRealized Gain,Base Accrued InterestBase Commission,Base Amount01/20/201901/20/2019055657AC4BMWLT 171 A3Direct05/20/20201.980.00-39,392.22---0.00-39,392.220.000.000.0039,392.2202/20/201902/20/2019055657AC4BMWLT 171 A3Direct05/20/20201.980.00-42,108.41---0.00-42,108.410.000.000.0042,108.4103/20/201903/20/2019055657AC4BMWLT 171 A3Direct05/20/20201.980.00-39,945.28---0.00-39,945.280.000.000.0039,945.2801/20/201901/20/201905584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2ADirect02/20/20201.800.00-27,414.88---0.00-27,414.880.000.000.0027,414.8802/20/201902/20/201905584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2ADirect02/20/20201.800.00-29,200.25---0.00-29,200.250.000.000.0029,200.2503/20/201903/20/201905584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2ADirect02/20/20201.800.00-27,259.22---0.00-27,259.220.000.000.0027,259.2201/15/201901/15/201931680GAD8FITAT 151 A3Direct03/16/20201.420.00-10,228.54---0.00-10,228.540.000.000.0010,228.5401/18/201901/18/2019438124AC3HAROT 163 A3Direct05/18/20201.160.00-18,957.50---0.00-18,957.49-0.010.000.0018,957.49Trading ActivityBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 68 Trade Date,Settle DateIdentifier,DescriptionBroker/Dealer,Final Maturity,Coupon RateBase Original Units,Base Current Units,PricePurchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase Net TotalRealized Gain,Base Accrued InterestBase Commission,Base Amount02/18/201902/18/2019438124AC3HAROT 163 A3Direct05/18/20201.160.00-19,159.76---0.00-19,159.760.000.000.0019,159.7603/18/201903/18/2019438124AC3HAROT 163 A3Direct05/18/20201.160.00-17,783.06---0.00-17,783.060.000.000.0017,783.0603/21/201903/21/201943815HAB3HAROT 183 A2Direct12/21/20202.670.00-59,620.71---0.00-59,620.710.000.000.0059,620.7101/15/201901/15/201947788CAB8JDOT 2018 A2Direct10/15/20202.420.00-15,803.32---0.00-15,803.320.000.000.0015,803.3202/15/201902/15/201947788CAB8JDOT 2018 A2Direct10/15/20202.420.00-17,800.85---0.00-17,800.850.000.000.0017,800.8503/15/201903/15/201947788CAB8JDOT 2018 A2Direct10/15/20202.420.00-12,159.20---0.00-12,159.200.000.000.0012,159.2001/15/201901/15/201958769DAB6MBALT 17A A2ADirect08/15/20191.530.00-13,007.54---0.00-13,007.540.000.000.0013,007.5401/15/201901/15/201958772RAB0MBART 181 A2ADirect04/15/20212.710.00-7,539.46---0.00-7,539.460.000.000.007,539.4602/15/201902/15/201958772RAB0MBART 181 A2ADirect04/15/20212.710.00-52,036.13---0.00-52,036.130.000.000.0052,036.1303/15/201903/15/201958772RAB0MBART 181 A2ADirect04/15/20212.710.00-44,540.72---0.00-44,540.720.000.000.0044,540.7201/15/201901/15/201989237WAD9TAOT 16C A3Direct08/17/20201.140.00-19,536.02---0.00-19,536.020.000.000.0019,536.0202/15/201902/15/201989237WAD9TAOT 16C A3Direct08/17/20201.140.00-19,283.91---0.00-19,283.910.000.000.0019,283.9103/15/201903/15/201989237WAD9TAOT 16C A3Direct08/17/20201.140.00-17,929.29---0.00-17,929.290.000.000.0017,929.2901/15/201901/15/201990290AAB3USAOT 171 A2Direct02/18/20201.540.00-19,398.96---0.00-19,398.960.000.000.0019,398.9602/20/201902/20/201992868LAB7VALET 181 A2ADirect07/20/20212.810.00-18,150.70---0.00-18,150.700.000.000.0018,150.7003/20/201903/20/201992868LAB7VALET 181 A2ADirect07/20/20212.810.00-49,354.75---0.00-49,354.750.010.000.0049,354.75Trading ActivityBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 69 SellTrade Date,Settle DateIdentifier,DescriptionBroker/Dealer,Final Maturity,Coupon RateBase Original Units,Base Current Units,PricePurchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase Net TotalRealized Gain,Base Accrued InterestBase Commission,Base Amount------------Direct09/13/20202.080.00-637,610.68---0.00-637,610.67-0.010.000.00637,610.67Trade Date,Settle DateIdentifier,DescriptionBroker/Dealer,Final Maturity,Coupon RateBase Original Units,Base Current Units,PricePurchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase Net TotalRealized Gain,Base Accrued InterestBase Commission,Base Amount01/03/201901/03/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-310,278.74-310,278.741.00-310,278.74-310,278.740.000.000.00310,278.7401/08/201901/08/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-799,623.56-799,623.561.00-799,623.56-799,623.560.000.000.00799,623.5601/10/201901/10/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-502,535.55-502,535.551.00-502,535.55-502,535.550.000.000.00502,535.5501/17/201901/17/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-1,984,067.22-1,984,067.221.00-1,984,067.22-1,984,067.220.000.000.001,984,067.2201/17/201901/17/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-247,368.55-247,368.551.00-247,368.55-247,368.550.000.000.00247,368.5501/17/201901/17/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-797,982.39-797,982.391.00-797,982.39-797,982.390.000.000.00797,982.3901/22/201901/22/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-4,604.26-4,604.261.00-4,604.26-4,604.260.000.000.004,604.2601/22/201901/22/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-4,323.53-4,323.531.00-4,323.53-4,323.530.000.000.004,323.5301/25/201901/25/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-986,374.72-986,374.721.00-986,374.72-986,374.720.000.000.00986,374.7202/01/201902/01/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-995,533.33-995,533.331.00-995,533.33-995,533.330.000.000.00995,533.3302/01/201902/01/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-39,051.53-39,051.531.00-39,051.53-39,051.530.000.000.0039,051.5302/05/201902/05/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-498,305.56-498,305.561.00-498,305.56-498,305.560.000.000.00498,305.5602/06/201902/06/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-796,888.89-796,888.891.00-796,888.89-796,888.890.000.000.00796,888.89Trading ActivityBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 70 Summary * Grouped by: Transaction Type. * Groups Sorted by: Transaction Type. * Showing transactions with Trade Date within selected date range. * Weighted by: Absolute Value ofBase Principal. * MMF transactions are expanded. * The Transaction Detail/Trading Activity reports provide our most up-to-date transactional details. As such, these reports are subject to change even after the other reports on thewebsite have been locked down. While these reports can be useful tools in understanding recent activity, due to their dynamic nature we do not recommend using them for bookingjournal entries or reconciliation.Trade Date,Settle DateIdentifier,DescriptionBroker/Dealer,Final Maturity,Coupon RateBase Original Units,Base Current Units,PricePurchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase Net TotalRealized Gain,Base Accrued InterestBase Commission,Base Amount02/11/201902/11/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-46.80-46.801.00-46.80-46.800.000.000.0046.8002/27/201902/27/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-744,803.91-744,803.911.00-744,803.91-744,803.910.000.000.00744,803.9102/28/201902/28/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.33-719,041.85-719,041.851.00-719,041.85-719,041.850.000.000.00719,041.8503/14/201903/14/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.38-501,895.05-501,895.051.00-501,895.05-501,895.050.000.000.00501,895.0503/21/201903/21/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.38-449,469.97-449,469.971.00-449,469.97-449,469.970.000.000.00449,469.9703/22/201903/22/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.38-948,771.41-948,771.411.00-948,771.41-948,771.410.000.000.00948,771.4103/29/201903/29/201994975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.38-702,327.50-702,327.501.00-702,327.50-702,327.500.000.000.00702,327.50------94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMFDirect03/31/20192.34-12,033,294.32-12,033,294.321.00-12,033,294.32-12,033,294.320.000.000.0012,033,294.32Trade Date,Settle DateIdentifier,DescriptionBroker/Dealer,Final Maturity,Coupon RateBase Original Units,Base Current Units,PricePurchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase Net TotalRealized Gain,Base Accrued InterestBase Commission,Base Amount---------------05/21/20191.71657,937.06-36,089.04----333,062.94-89,137.92-0.0130,066.050.0059,071.87Trading ActivityBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 71 * Does not Lock Down.ReceivableSettledEntry Date,Settle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount03/29/201903/29/2019Money Market Funds0.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/2019---874.2503/29/201903/29/2019Money Market Funds0.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/2019---874.25Entry Date,Settle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount01/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 02587AAJ3AMXCA 171 A1.93 02/18/2020---804.1702/15/201902/15/2019Coupon0.00 02587AAJ3AMXCA 171 A1.93 02/18/2020---804.1703/15/201903/15/2019Coupon0.00 02587AAJ3AMXCA 171 A1.93 02/18/2020---804.1702/21/201902/21/2019Coupon0.00 02665WCL3AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP2.79 02/21/2020---5,001.3902/25/201902/27/2019Buy750,000.00 05522RCW6BACCT 171 A1.95 03/16/202099.24-744,803.9103/15/201903/15/2019Coupon0.00 05522RCW6BACCT 171 A1.95 03/16/2020---1,218.7501/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 05531FAS2BB&T CORP2.45 01/15/2020---3,062.5001/20/201901/20/2019Coupon0.00 055657AC4BMWLT 171 A31.98 05/20/2020---617.7001/20/201901/20/2019Principal Paydown-39,392.22 055657AC4BMWLT 171 A31.98 05/20/2020---39,392.2202/20/201902/20/2019Coupon0.00 055657AC4BMWLT 171 A31.98 05/20/2020---552.7102/20/201902/20/2019Principal Paydown-42,108.41 055657AC4BMWLT 171 A31.98 05/20/2020---42,108.4103/20/201903/20/2019Coupon0.00 055657AC4BMWLT 171 A31.98 05/20/2020---483.2303/20/201903/20/2019Principal Paydown-39,945.28 055657AC4BMWLT 171 A31.98 05/20/2020---39,945.2801/20/201901/20/2019Coupon0.00 05584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2A1.80 02/20/2020---255.3301/20/201901/20/2019Principal Paydown-27,414.88 05584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2A1.80 02/20/2020---27,414.8802/20/201902/20/2019Coupon0.00 05584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2A1.80 02/20/2020---214.2102/20/201902/20/2019Principal Paydown-29,200.25 05584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2A1.80 02/20/2020---29,200.25Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 72 Entry Date,Settle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount03/20/201903/20/2019Coupon0.00 05584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2A1.80 02/20/2020---170.4103/20/201903/20/2019Principal Paydown-27,259.22 05584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2A1.80 02/20/2020---27,259.2201/02/201901/02/2019Coupon0.00 06051GFE4BANK OF AMERICA CORP3.67 04/01/2019---6,243.5001/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 06406HCP2BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP2.10 01/15/2019---6,300.0001/15/201901/15/2019Maturity-600,000.00 06406HCP2BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP2.10 01/15/2019100.00600,000.0002/14/201902/14/2019Coupon0.00 084670BL1BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC2.10 08/14/2019---7,350.0001/23/201901/23/2019Maturity-500,000.00 09702MNP4The Boeing Company0.00 01/23/2019100.00500,000.0001/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 14041NFC0COMET 161 A2.96 04/15/2019---1,404.1502/15/201902/15/2019Coupon0.00 14041NFC0COMET 161 A2.94 04/15/2019---1,528.7903/15/201903/15/2019Coupon0.00 14041NFC0COMET 161 A2.93 04/15/2019---1,371.4201/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 14041NFE6COMET 163 A1.34 06/17/2019---279.1702/15/201902/15/2019Coupon0.00 14041NFE6COMET 163 A1.34 06/17/2019---279.1703/15/201903/15/2019Coupon0.00 14041NFE6COMET 163 A1.34 06/17/2019---279.1701/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 14041NFF3COMET 164 A1.33 08/15/2019---443.3302/15/201902/15/2019Coupon0.00 14041NFF3COMET 164 A1.33 08/15/2019---443.3303/15/201903/15/2019Coupon0.00 14041NFF3COMET 164 A1.33 08/15/2019---443.3301/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 161571FK5CHAIT 124 A1.58 08/15/2019---625.4202/15/201902/15/2019Coupon0.00 161571FK5CHAIT 124 A1.58 08/15/2019---625.4203/15/201903/15/2019Coupon0.00 161571FK5CHAIT 124 A1.58 08/15/2019---625.4201/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 161571HC1CHAIT 162 A1.37 06/17/2019---342.5002/15/201902/15/2019Coupon0.00 161571HC1CHAIT 162 A1.37 06/17/2019---342.5003/15/201903/15/2019Coupon0.00 161571HC1CHAIT 162 A1.37 06/17/2019---342.5003/03/201903/03/2019Coupon0.00 166764AR1CHEVRON CORP1.96 03/03/2020---1,961.00Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 73 Entry Date,Settle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount01/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 17305EFS9CCCIT 14A6 A62.15 07/15/2019---4,300.0003/20/201903/20/2019Coupon0.00 17325FAB4CITIBANK NA3.13 03/20/2019---5,872.5003/20/201903/20/2019Maturity-750,000.00 17325FAB4CITIBANK NA3.13 03/20/2019100.00750,000.0003/20/201903/22/2019Buy700,000.00 17325FAN8CITIBANK NA3.05 05/01/2020100.27-710,287.0802/13/201902/13/2019Coupon0.00 22546QAC1CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON NEWYORK BRANCH5.30 08/13/2019---17,225.0003/15/201903/15/2019Coupon0.00 30231GAD4EXXON MOBIL CORP1.82 03/15/2019---4,320.1303/15/201903/15/2019Maturity-475,000.00 30231GAD4EXXON MOBIL CORP1.82 03/15/2019100.00475,000.0001/16/201901/16/2019Coupon0.00 3130AAE46FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1.25 01/16/2019---6,250.0001/16/201901/16/2019Maturity-1,000,000.00 3130AAE46FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1.25 01/16/2019100.001,000,000.0003/20/201903/22/2019Buy1,000,000.00 313370US5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS2.88 09/11/2020100.53-1,006,178.8903/12/201903/12/2019Maturity-750,000.00 313384CY3FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00 03/12/2019100.00750,000.0002/01/201902/01/2019Buy1,000,000.00 313384EC9FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00 04/09/201999.55-995,533.3301/17/201901/17/2019Buy2,000,000.00 313384FR5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00 05/16/201999.20-1,984,067.2201/18/201901/18/2019Maturity-900,000.00 313396AT0FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP0.00 01/18/2019100.00900,000.0002/22/201902/22/2019Coupon0.00 3133EFC70FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP1.12 02/22/2019---4,200.0002/22/201902/22/2019Maturity-750,000.00 3133EFC70FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP1.12 02/22/2019100.00750,000.0001/30/201901/30/2019Maturity-500,000.00 3134G92B2FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP0.95 01/30/2019100.00500,000.0001/30/201901/30/2019Maturity-500,000.00 3134G92B2FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP0.95 01/30/2019100.00500,000.0001/30/201901/30/2019Coupon0.00 3134G92B2FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP0.95 01/30/2019---4,750.0001/26/201901/26/2019Coupon0.00 3134G9Q75FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP1.25 07/26/2019---3,125.0001/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 31680GAD8FITAT 151 A31.42 03/16/2020---12.1001/15/201901/15/2019Principal Paydown-10,228.54 31680GAD8FITAT 151 A31.42 03/16/2020---10,228.54Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 74 Entry Date,Settle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount03/19/201903/21/2019Buy500,000.00 369550BA5GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP2.88 05/11/2020100.24-506,410.9701/18/201901/18/2019Coupon0.00 438124AC3HAROT 163 A31.16 05/18/2020---128.2501/18/201901/18/2019Principal Paydown-18,957.50 438124AC3HAROT 163 A31.16 05/18/2020---18,957.4902/18/201902/18/2019Coupon0.00 438124AC3HAROT 163 A31.16 05/18/2020---109.9202/18/201902/18/2019Principal Paydown-19,159.76 438124AC3HAROT 163 A31.16 05/18/2020---19,159.7603/18/201903/18/2019Coupon0.00 438124AC3HAROT 163 A31.16 05/18/2020---91.4003/18/201903/18/2019Principal Paydown-17,783.06 438124AC3HAROT 163 A31.16 05/18/2020---17,783.0602/26/201902/28/2019Buy718,584.57 43815HAB3HAROT 183 A22.67 12/21/2020100.01-719,041.8503/21/201903/21/2019Coupon0.00 43815HAB3HAROT 183 A22.67 12/21/2020---1,598.8503/21/201903/21/2019Principal Paydown-59,620.71 43815HAB3HAROT 183 A22.67 12/21/2020---59,620.7103/12/201903/14/2019Buy500,000.00 438516BP0HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC2.79 10/30/2019100.05-501,895.0501/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 45818WAV8INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK2.48 01/15/2019---3,164.1701/15/201901/15/2019Maturity-500,000.00 45818WAV8INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK2.48 01/15/2019100.00500,000.0001/30/201902/01/2019Buy500,000.00 459058FK4INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM0.88 08/15/201999.07-497,347.3602/15/201902/15/2019Coupon0.00 459058FK4INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM0.88 08/15/2019---2,190.0001/08/201901/10/2019Buy500,000.00 45905UK60INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM2.33 07/19/201999.97-502,535.5501/22/201901/22/2019Coupon0.00 45905UK60INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM2.64 07/19/2019---3,075.0003/22/201903/22/2019Coupon0.00 46625HQU7JPMORGAN CHASE & CO1.85 03/22/2019---6,475.0003/22/201903/22/2019Maturity-700,000.00 46625HQU7JPMORGAN CHASE & CO1.85 03/22/2019100.00700,000.0001/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 47788CAB8JDOT 2018 A22.42 10/15/2020---284.0701/15/201901/15/2019Principal Paydown-15,803.32 47788CAB8JDOT 2018 A22.42 10/15/2020---15,803.32Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 75 Entry Date,Settle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount02/15/201902/15/2019Coupon0.00 47788CAB8JDOT 2018 A22.42 10/15/2020---252.2002/15/201902/15/2019Principal Paydown-17,800.85 47788CAB8JDOT 2018 A22.42 10/15/2020---17,800.8503/15/201903/15/2019Coupon0.00 47788CAB8JDOT 2018 A22.42 10/15/2020---216.3003/15/201903/15/2019Principal Paydown-12,159.20 47788CAB8JDOT 2018 A22.42 10/15/2020---12,159.2002/06/201902/06/2019Maturity-800,000.00 48306BP66Kaiser Foundation Hospitals0.00 02/06/2019100.00800,000.0002/06/201902/06/2019Buy800,000.00 48306BR31Kaiser Foundation Hospitals0.00 04/03/201999.61-796,888.8903/01/201903/01/2019Coupon0.00 544351MK2LOS ANGELES CALIF4.00 09/01/2019---19,083.3301/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 58769DAB6MBALT 17A A2A1.53 08/15/2019---16.5801/15/201901/15/2019Principal Paydown-13,007.54 58769DAB6MBALT 17A A2A1.53 08/15/2019---13,007.5401/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 58772RAB0MBART 181 A2A2.71 04/15/2021---1,355.0001/15/201901/15/2019Principal Paydown-7,539.46 58772RAB0MBART 181 A2A2.71 04/15/2021---7,539.4602/15/201902/15/2019Coupon0.00 58772RAB0MBART 181 A2A2.71 04/15/2021---1,337.9702/15/201902/15/2019Principal Paydown-52,036.13 58772RAB0MBART 181 A2A2.71 04/15/2021---52,036.1303/15/201903/15/2019Coupon0.00 58772RAB0MBART 181 A2A2.71 04/15/2021---1,220.4603/15/201903/15/2019Principal Paydown-44,540.72 58772RAB0MBART 181 A2A2.71 04/15/2021---44,540.7202/01/201902/01/2019Coupon0.00 637432MX0NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPFINANCE CORP2.15 02/01/2019---4,837.5002/01/201902/01/2019Maturity-450,000.00 637432MX0NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPFINANCE CORP2.15 02/01/2019100.00450,000.0001/03/201901/03/2019Maturity-500,000.00 63763QN37National Securities Clearing Corporation0.00 01/03/2019100.00500,000.0001/03/201901/03/2019Buy311,000.00 63763QP50National Securities Clearing Corporation0.00 02/05/201999.77-310,278.7402/05/201902/05/2019Maturity-311,000.00 63763QP50National Securities Clearing Corporation0.00 02/05/2019100.00311,000.0002/05/201902/05/2019Buy500,000.00 63763QQT7National Securities Clearing Corporation0.00 03/27/201999.66-498,305.5603/27/201903/27/2019Maturity-500,000.00 63763QQT7National Securities Clearing Corporation0.00 03/27/2019100.00500,000.00Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 76 Entry Date,Settle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount01/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 65478GAD2NAROT 17B A31.75 10/15/2021---1,093.7502/15/201902/15/2019Coupon0.00 65478GAD2NAROT 17B A31.75 10/15/2021---1,093.7503/15/201903/15/2019Coupon0.00 65478GAD2NAROT 17B A31.75 10/15/2021---1,093.7501/24/201901/25/2019Buy1,000,000.00 67983UUR2Old Line Funding, LLC0.00 07/25/201998.64-986,374.7201/28/201901/28/2019Coupon0.00 69353RCH9PNC BANK NA2.20 01/28/2019---8,250.0001/28/201901/28/2019Maturity-750,000.00 69353RCH9PNC BANK NA2.20 01/28/2019100.00750,000.0002/04/201902/06/2019Buy680,000.00 69353RFD5PNC BANK NA3.00 05/19/2020100.19-685,734.6702/19/201902/19/2019Coupon0.00 69353RFD5PNC BANK NA3.04 05/19/2020---5,213.3303/27/201903/29/2019Buy700,000.00 69371RM78PACCAR INC2.50 08/14/2020100.02-702,327.5001/01/201901/01/2019Coupon0.00 797669XS2SAN FRANCISCO CALIF BAY AREA RAPIDTRAN DIST SALES2.01 07/01/2019---7,541.2502/01/201902/01/2019Coupon0.00 798170AB2SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THEREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TH2.10 08/01/2019---1,573.5001/08/201901/08/2019Maturity-800,000.00 88602UN89Thunder Bay Funding, LLC0.00 01/08/2019100.00800,000.0001/08/201901/08/2019Buy800,000.00 88602UNF3Thunder Bay Funding, LLC0.00 01/15/201999.95-799,623.5601/15/201901/15/2019Maturity-800,000.00 88602UNF3Thunder Bay Funding, LLC0.00 01/15/2019100.00800,000.0001/17/201901/17/2019Coupon0.00 89236TBB0TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP2.10 01/17/2019---1,984.5001/17/201901/17/2019Maturity-189,000.00 89236TBB0TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP2.10 01/17/2019100.00189,000.0001/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 89237WAD9TAOT 16C A31.14 08/17/2020---158.5201/15/201901/15/2019Principal Paydown-19,536.02 89237WAD9TAOT 16C A31.14 08/17/2020---19,536.0202/15/201902/15/2019Coupon0.00 89237WAD9TAOT 16C A31.14 08/17/2020---139.9602/15/201902/15/2019Principal Paydown-19,283.91 89237WAD9TAOT 16C A31.14 08/17/2020---19,283.9103/15/201903/15/2019Coupon0.00 89237WAD9TAOT 16C A31.14 08/17/2020---121.6403/15/201903/15/2019Principal Paydown-17,929.29 89237WAD9TAOT 16C A31.14 08/17/2020---17,929.29Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 77 Entry Date,Settle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount01/15/201901/15/2019Coupon0.00 90290AAB3USAOT 171 A21.54 02/18/2020---24.9001/15/201901/15/2019Principal Paydown-19,398.96 90290AAB3USAOT 171 A21.54 02/18/2020---19,398.9601/17/201901/17/2019Coupon0.00 90331HNK5US BANK NA2.90 01/17/2020---4,604.2601/31/201901/31/2019Coupon0.00 9128282K5UNITED STATES TREASURY1.38 07/31/2019---6,875.0001/16/201901/17/2019Buy1,000,000.00 912828U32UNITED STATES TREASURY1.00 11/15/201998.72-988,966.8901/22/201901/22/2019Coupon0.00 92348XAB1VZOT 18A A1B2.75 04/20/2023---1,987.4302/20/201902/20/2019Coupon0.00 92348XAB1VZOT 18A A1B2.72 04/20/2023---1,769.6403/20/201903/20/2019Coupon0.00 92348XAB1VZOT 18A A1B2.73 04/20/2023---1,695.4001/20/201901/20/2019Coupon0.00 92868LAB7VALET 181 A2A2.81 07/20/2021---1,756.2502/20/201902/20/2019Coupon0.00 92868LAB7VALET 181 A2A2.81 07/20/2021---1,756.2502/20/201902/20/2019Principal Paydown-18,150.70 92868LAB7VALET 181 A2A2.81 07/20/2021---18,150.7003/20/201903/20/2019Coupon0.00 92868LAB7VALET 181 A2A2.81 07/20/2021---1,713.7503/20/201903/20/2019Principal Paydown-49,354.75 92868LAB7VALET 181 A2A2.81 07/20/2021---49,354.7503/25/201903/25/2019Coupon0.00 931142EF6WALMART INC2.64 06/23/2020---5,011.5601/02/201901/02/2019Buy15,547.15 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-15,547.1501/03/201901/03/2019Buy500,000.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-500,000.0001/03/201901/03/2019Sell-310,278.74 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00310,278.7401/08/201901/08/2019Sell-799,623.56 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00799,623.5601/08/201901/08/2019Buy800,000.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-800,000.0001/10/201901/10/2019Sell-502,535.55 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00502,535.5501/15/201901/15/2019Buy20,424.39 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-20,424.3901/15/201901/15/2019Buy342.50 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-342.5001/15/201901/15/2019Buy3,165.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-3,165.00Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 78 Entry Date,Settle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount01/15/201901/15/2019Buy1,965,541.99 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-1,965,541.9901/16/201901/16/2019Buy1,025,961.12 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-1,025,961.1201/17/201901/17/2019Sell-797,982.39 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00797,982.3901/17/201901/17/2019Sell-247,368.55 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00247,368.5501/17/201901/17/2019Sell-1,984,067.22 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.001,984,067.2201/18/201901/18/2019Buy23,690.01 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-23,690.0101/18/201901/18/2019Buy904,604.26 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-904,604.2601/22/201901/22/2019Sell-4,604.26 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.004,604.2601/22/201901/22/2019Buy27,670.21 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-27,670.2101/22/201901/22/2019Sell-4,323.53 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.004,323.5301/22/201901/22/2019Buy43,753.60 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-43,753.6001/23/201901/23/2019Buy503,075.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-503,075.0001/25/201901/25/2019Sell-986,374.72 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00986,374.7201/28/201901/28/2019Buy761,375.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-761,375.0001/30/201901/30/2019Buy1,004,750.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-1,004,750.0001/31/201901/31/2019Buy6,875.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-6,875.0001/31/201901/31/2019Money Market Funds0.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/2019---1,884.8302/01/201902/01/2019Sell-995,533.33 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00995,533.3302/01/201902/01/2019Sell-39,051.53 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.0039,051.5302/05/201902/05/2019Buy311,000.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-311,000.0002/05/201902/05/2019Sell-498,305.56 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00498,305.5602/06/201902/06/2019Sell-796,888.89 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00796,888.8902/06/201902/06/2019Buy114,265.33 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-114,265.33Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 79 Entry Date,Settle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount02/11/201902/11/2019Sell-46.80 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.0046.8002/13/201902/13/2019Buy17,225.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-17,225.0002/14/201902/14/2019Buy7,350.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-7,350.0002/15/201902/15/2019Buy2,190.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-2,190.0002/15/201902/15/2019Buy37,819.42 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-37,819.4202/19/201902/19/2019Buy7,365.42 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-7,365.4202/19/201902/19/2019Buy55,996.64 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-55,996.6402/19/201902/19/2019Buy19,269.68 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-19,269.6802/20/201902/20/2019Buy29,414.46 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-29,414.4602/20/201902/20/2019Buy40,099.06 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-40,099.0602/21/201902/21/2019Buy19,906.95 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-19,906.9502/21/201902/21/2019Buy5,001.39 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-5,001.3902/22/201902/22/2019Buy754,200.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00-754,200.0002/27/201902/27/2019Sell-744,803.91 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00744,803.9102/28/201902/28/2019Sell-719,041.85 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/20191.00719,041.8502/28/201902/28/2019Money Market Funds0.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.33 03/31/2019---1,523.9603/01/201903/01/2019Buy20,607.29 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00-20,607.2903/04/201903/04/2019Buy1,961.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00-1,961.0003/12/201903/12/2019Buy750,000.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00-750,000.0003/14/201903/14/2019Sell-501,895.05 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00501,895.0503/15/201903/15/2019Buy58,415.84 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00-58,415.8403/15/201903/15/2019Buy501,834.15 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00-501,834.1503/15/201903/15/2019Buy342.50 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00-342.50Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 80 Summary * Grouped by: Status. * Groups Sorted by: Status. * Showing transactions with Entry Date within selected date range. * Weighted by: Absolute Value of Base Principal. *MMF transactions are expanded. * The Transaction Detail/Trading Activity reports provide our most up-to-date transactional details. As such, these reports are subject to change even after the other reports on thewebsite have been locked down. While these reports can be useful tools in understanding recent activity, due to their dynamic nature we do not recommend using them for bookingjournal entries or reconciliation.Entry Date,Settle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount03/18/201903/18/2019Buy18,968.21 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00-18,968.2103/20/201903/20/2019Buy787,782.62 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00-787,782.6203/20/201903/20/2019Buy27,429.63 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00-27,429.6303/21/201903/21/2019Sell-449,469.97 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00449,469.9703/22/201903/22/2019Sell-948,771.41 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00948,771.4103/25/201903/25/2019Buy5,011.56 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00-5,011.5603/27/201903/27/2019Buy500,000.00 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00-500,000.0003/29/201903/29/2019Sell-702,327.50 94975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF2.38 03/31/20191.00702,327.5001/17/201901/17/2019Cash Transfer0.00 CCYUSDUS DOLLAR0.00 03/31/2019----247,368.5501/22/201901/22/2019Management Fee0.00 CCYUSDUS DOLLAR0.00 03/31/2019----4,323.5302/20/201902/20/2019Management Fee0.00 CCYUSDUS DOLLAR0.00 03/31/2019----4,331.7003/20/201903/20/2019Management Fee0.00 CCYUSDUS DOLLAR0.00 03/31/2019----4,341.29----------36,089.04 --------- 05/21/2019----1,716.43Entry Date,Settle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount----------36,089.04 --------- 05/21/2019----842.18Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 81 * Does not Lock Down.ReceivableSettledEntry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierTicker DescriptionBase Amount03/29/2019 03/29/2019 Money Market Funds0.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF874.2503/29/2019 03/29/2019 Money Market Funds0.00 94975P405 GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMF874.25Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierTicker DescriptionBase Amount01/02/2019 01/02/2019 Buy15,547.15 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-15,547.1501/03/2019 01/03/2019 Buy500,000.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-500,000.0001/03/2019 01/03/2019 Sell-310,278.74 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF310,278.7401/08/2019 01/08/2019 Sell-799,623.56 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF799,623.5601/08/2019 01/08/2019 Buy800,000.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-800,000.0001/10/2019 01/10/2019 Sell-502,535.55 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF502,535.5501/15/2019 01/15/2019 Buy20,424.39 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-20,424.3901/15/2019 01/15/2019 Buy342.50 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-342.5001/15/2019 01/15/2019 Buy3,165.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-3,165.0001/15/2019 01/15/2019 Buy1,965,541.99 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-1,965,541.9901/16/2019 01/16/2019 Buy1,025,961.12 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-1,025,961.1201/17/2019 01/17/2019 Sell-797,982.39 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF797,982.3901/17/2019 01/17/2019 Sell-247,368.55 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF247,368.5501/17/2019 01/17/2019 Sell-1,984,067.22 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF1,984,067.2201/18/2019 01/18/2019 Buy23,690.01 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-23,690.0101/18/2019 01/18/2019 Buy904,604.26 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-904,604.2601/22/2019 01/22/2019 Sell-4,604.26 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF4,604.2601/22/2019 01/22/2019 Buy27,670.21 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-27,670.2101/22/2019 01/22/2019 Sell-4,323.53 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF4,323.5301/22/2019 01/22/2019 Buy43,753.60 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-43,753.6001/23/2019 01/23/2019 Buy503,075.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-503,075.0001/25/2019 01/25/2019 Sell-986,374.72 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF986,374.7201/28/2019 01/28/2019 Buy761,375.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-761,375.0001/30/2019 01/30/2019 Buy1,004,750.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-1,004,750.0001/31/2019 01/31/2019 Buy6,875.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-6,875.0001/31/2019 01/31/2019 Money Market Funds0.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF1,884.8302/01/2019 02/01/2019 Sell-995,533.33 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF995,533.3302/01/2019 02/01/2019 Sell-39,051.53 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF39,051.5302/05/2019 02/05/2019 Buy311,000.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-311,000.0002/05/2019 02/05/2019 Sell-498,305.56 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF498,305.5602/06/2019 02/06/2019 Sell-796,888.89 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF796,888.89MMF Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 82 SummaryEntry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierTicker DescriptionBase Amount02/06/2019 02/06/2019 Buy114,265.33 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-114,265.3302/11/2019 02/11/2019 Sell-46.80 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF46.8002/13/2019 02/13/2019 Buy17,225.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-17,225.0002/14/2019 02/14/2019 Buy7,350.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-7,350.0002/15/2019 02/15/2019 Buy2,190.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-2,190.0002/15/2019 02/15/2019 Buy37,819.42 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-37,819.4202/19/2019 02/19/2019 Buy7,365.42 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-7,365.4202/19/2019 02/19/2019 Buy55,996.64 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-55,996.6402/19/2019 02/19/2019 Buy19,269.68 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-19,269.6802/20/2019 02/20/2019 Buy29,414.46 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-29,414.4602/20/2019 02/20/2019 Buy40,099.06 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-40,099.0602/21/2019 02/21/2019 Buy19,906.95 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-19,906.9502/21/2019 02/21/2019 Buy5,001.39 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-5,001.3902/22/2019 02/22/2019 Buy754,200.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-754,200.0002/27/2019 02/27/2019 Sell-744,803.91 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF744,803.9102/28/2019 02/28/2019 Sell-719,041.85 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF719,041.8502/28/2019 02/28/2019 Money Market Funds0.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF1,523.9603/01/2019 03/01/2019 Buy20,607.29 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-20,607.2903/04/2019 03/04/2019 Buy1,961.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-1,961.0003/12/2019 03/12/2019 Buy750,000.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-750,000.0003/14/2019 03/14/2019 Sell-501,895.05 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF501,895.0503/15/2019 03/15/2019 Buy58,415.84 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-58,415.8403/15/2019 03/15/2019 Buy501,834.15 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-501,834.1503/15/2019 03/15/2019 Buy342.50 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-342.5003/18/2019 03/18/2019 Buy18,968.21 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-18,968.2103/20/2019 03/20/2019 Buy787,782.62 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-787,782.6203/20/2019 03/20/2019 Buy27,429.63 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-27,429.6303/21/2019 03/21/2019 Sell-449,469.97 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF449,469.9703/22/2019 03/22/2019 Sell-948,771.41 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF948,771.4103/25/2019 03/25/2019 Buy5,011.56 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-5,011.5603/27/2019 03/27/2019 Buy500,000.00 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF-500,000.0003/29/2019 03/29/2019 Sell-702,327.50 94975P405GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF702,327.50----------333,062.94 94975P405 GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMF336,471.73Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierTicker DescriptionBase Amount----------333,062.94 94975P405 GVIXX WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL IMMF337,345.98MMF Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 83 * Grouped by: Status. * Groups Sorted by: Status. * Filtered By: Security Type = "MMFUND". * Showing transactions with Entry Date within selected date range. * Weightedby: Absolute Value of Base Principal. * MMF transactions are expanded. * The Transaction Detail/Trading Activity reports provide our most up-to-date transactional details. As such, these reports are subject to change even after the other reports on thewebsite have been locked down. While these reports can be useful tools in understanding recent activity, due to their dynamic nature we do not recommend using them for bookingjournal entries or reconciliation.MMF Transaction DetailBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 84 Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns,Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/Accretion,Change In AccruedBalanceNet Realized Gain/Loss,Base Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/Receivables,Ending Market Value +Accrued438124AC3HAROT 163 A3131,960.120.000.000.00-55,900.310.00218.82-23.42-0.01295.850.0076,551.0643815HAB3HAROT 183 A20.00718,668.780.000.00-59,620.710.00-13.37488.730.0099.770.00659,623.2047788CAB8JDOT 2018 A2140,745.430.000.000.00-45,763.370.001.62-49.220.00182.990.0095,117.4431680GAD8FITAT 151 A310,228.580.000.000.00-10,228.540.000.34-6.460.006.080.000.0090290AAB3USAOT 171 A219,400.170.000.000.00-19,398.960.000.01-13.280.0012.060.000.0058769DAB6MBALT 17A A2A13,008.600.000.000.00-13,007.540.000.00-8.850.007.780.000.0058772RAB0MBART 181 A2A599,581.230.000.000.00-104,116.310.005.00-125.400.001,289.460.00496,633.9894975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMF460,253.0011,700,231.38-12,033,294.320.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00127,190.06CCYUSDCash1.880.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00-0.831.05CCYUSDReceivable1,763.250.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00-889.00874.2522546QAC1CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON NEW YORKBRANCH671,391.280.000.000.000.000.00-3,892.50-8,612.500.001,547.950.00660,434.23166764AR1CHEVRON CORP199,277.540.000.000.000.000.00500.21-980.500.00187.390.00198,984.643133EFLA3FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP495,506.330.000.000.000.000.001,797.561,550.000.00834.440.00499,688.333134G9Q75FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP498,637.470.000.000.000.000.001,365.17-1,562.500.00648.330.00499,088.4714041NFE6COMET 163 A248,224.190.000.000.000.000.00815.640.000.00418.130.00249,457.9614041NFF3COMET 164 A396,194.000.000.000.000.000.001,371.950.000.00791.770.00398,357.7217325FAB4CITIBANK NA750,965.250.000.00-750,000.000.000.000.00-783.000.00-182.250.000.0065478GAD2NAROT 17B A3445,121.590.000.000.000.000.001,005.500.000.00648.610.00446,775.7065478GAD2NAROT 17B A3296,747.720.000.000.000.000.00567.450.000.00535.290.00297,850.46438516BP0HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC0.00500,228.500.000.000.000.00-17.882,364.170.00-127.620.00502,447.1790331HNK5US BANK NA701,849.820.000.000.000.000.000.00367.010.002,195.200.00704,412.03Roll ForwardBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 85 Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns,Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/Accretion,Change In AccruedBalanceNet Realized Gain/Loss,Base Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/Receivables,Ending Market Value +Accrued45905UK60INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM0.00499,850.000.000.000.000.0063.952,530.960.0042.050.00502,486.96544351MK2LOS ANGELES CALIF770,263.330.000.000.000.000.00-2,614.00-11,583.330.00949.000.00757,015.0063763QP50National Securities Clearing Corporation0.00310,278.740.00-311,000.000.000.00721.260.000.000.000.000.00313384LA5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS983,403.000.000.000.000.000.006,550.000.000.005.000.00989,958.00313384EC9FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00995,533.330.000.000.000.003,933.340.000.00-4.670.00999,462.0048306BR31Kaiser Foundation Hospitals0.00796,888.890.000.000.000.003,000.000.000.00-179.440.00799,709.4509247XAE1BLACKROCK INC714,594.770.000.000.000.000.00-3,671.188,750.000.002,210.280.00721,883.8769353RCH9PNC BANK NA756,631.500.000.00-750,000.000.000.000.00-7,012.500.00381.000.000.0006051GFE4BANK OF AMERICA CORP747,266.390.000.000.000.000.00-1,290.38532.200.00200.350.00746,708.5706406HCU1BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP250,124.030.000.000.000.000.00-9.611,375.000.00422.360.00251,911.7869371RM78PACCAR INC0.00700,140.000.000.000.000.00-0.832,284.720.00-149.670.00702,274.223133EFC70FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP751,785.250.000.00-750,000.000.000.00294.96-3,010.000.00929.790.000.0007330NAL9BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO448,313.470.000.000.000.000.001,333.291,631.250.00701.610.00451,979.63459058FK4INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM0.00495,330.000.000.000.000.001,412.97559.030.00199.530.00497,501.53912828U32UNITED STATES TREASURY0.00987,226.560.000.000.000.003,129.923,784.530.00620.520.00994,761.53912828U73UNITED STATES TREASURY988,728.170.000.000.000.000.003,349.973,399.730.001,142.030.00996,619.9002587AAJ3AMXCA 171 A494,515.390.000.000.000.000.001,059.120.000.001,812.680.00497,387.1905522RCW6BACCT 171 A0.00744,316.410.000.000.000.00489.71650.000.00589.110.00746,045.2269353RFD5PNC BANK NA0.00681,258.000.000.000.000.00-155.102,356.540.00216.300.00683,675.749128282K5UNITED STATES TREASURY998,918.080.000.000.000.000.00309.42-3,475.070.002,854.580.00998,607.01Roll ForwardBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 86 Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns,Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/Accretion,Change In AccruedBalanceNet Realized Gain/Loss,Base Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/Receivables,Ending Market Value +Accrued797669XS2SAN FRANCISCO CALIF BAY AREA RAPIDTRAN DIST SALES755,291.250.000.000.000.000.000.00-3,770.630.001,312.500.00752,833.134581X0CH9INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK996,260.440.000.000.000.000.002,269.474,375.000.001,262.530.001,004,167.44010831DL6ALAMEDA CNTY CALIF JT PWRS AUTHLEASE REV500,205.420.000.000.000.000.000.003,106.250.00795.000.00504,106.67369550BA5GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP251,170.010.000.000.000.000.0056.531,796.880.00599.220.00253,622.64369550BA5GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP0.00501,220.000.000.000.000.00-32.185,590.280.00467.180.00507,245.2888602UNF3Thunder Bay Funding, LLC0.00799,623.560.00-800,000.000.000.00376.440.000.000.000.000.0002665WCL3AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP699,502.380.000.000.000.000.00-122.02-112.180.003,349.020.00702,617.20313384FV6FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS990,608.000.000.000.000.000.006,125.000.000.00-27.000.00996,706.00313312QL7FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS975,562.000.000.000.000.000.006,675.000.000.00839.000.00983,076.00313384CY3FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS746,521.500.000.00-750,000.000.000.003,485.420.000.00-6.920.000.00313370US5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.001,005,300.420.000.000.000.00-98.341,597.220.001,412.920.001,008,212.22161571FK5CHAIT 124 A471,466.580.000.000.000.000.001,251.580.000.00784.650.00473,502.8106406HCP2BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP605,633.600.000.00-600,000.000.000.0080.95-5,810.000.0095.450.000.00637432MX0NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPFINANCE CORP453,609.600.000.00-450,000.000.000.00176.14-4,031.250.00245.510.000.0030231GAD4EXXON MOBIL CORP476,669.120.000.00-475,000.000.000.00537.02-2,544.070.00337.930.000.0057636QAA2MASTERCARD INC501,071.500.000.000.000.000.00563.862,500.000.00864.640.00505,000.0040428HPN6HSBC USA INC (NEW)498,400.330.000.000.000.000.00774.812,968.750.001,142.190.00503,286.0846625HQU7JPMORGAN CHASE & CO701,549.450.000.00-700,000.000.000.006.55-3,561.250.002,005.250.000.00459058FC2INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM499,003.470.000.000.000.000.00411.431,562.500.001,248.070.00502,225.47Roll ForwardBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 87 Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns,Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/Accretion,Change In AccruedBalanceNet Realized Gain/Loss,Base Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/Receivables,Ending Market Value +Accrued459058FC2INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM299,402.080.000.000.000.000.00911.25937.500.0084.450.00301,335.2814041NFC0COMET 161 A601,269.100.000.000.000.000.00-534.72104.950.0076.500.00600,915.833134G92B2FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP501,456.860.000.00-500,000.000.000.00532.74-1,992.360.002.760.000.003134G92B2FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP501,456.860.000.00-500,000.000.000.00507.22-1,992.360.0028.280.000.0017305EFW0CCCIT 16A1 A1446,143.660.000.000.000.000.001,092.491,968.750.001,187.210.00450,392.113130ABF92FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS996,384.420.000.000.000.000.002,056.513,437.500.001,134.490.001,003,012.92798170AB2SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THEREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TH150,699.250.000.000.000.000.0073.28-786.750.00291.220.00150,277.0017325FAN8CITIBANK NA0.00701,925.000.000.000.000.00-47.418,895.830.00445.710.00711,219.1378607QAT2SACRAMENTO CALIF SUBN WTR DIST REV501,335.000.000.000.000.000.000.003,390.000.00930.000.00505,655.00931142EF6WALMART INC698,721.370.000.000.000.000.000.00-55.680.001,640.100.00700,305.79313396AT0FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP899,047.800.000.00-900,000.000.000.00913.750.000.0038.450.000.0088602UN89Thunder Bay Funding, LLC799,558.400.000.00-800,000.000.000.00382.670.000.0058.930.000.00313312NG1FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS489,745.000.000.000.000.000.003,287.500.000.00167.500.00493,200.0009702MNP4The Boeing Company499,210.020.000.00-500,000.000.000.00739.440.000.0050.540.000.0048306BP66Kaiser Foundation Hospitals797,719.980.000.00-800,000.000.000.002,000.000.000.00280.030.000.0024422ERR2JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP701,664.600.000.000.000.000.00388.423,937.500.001,059.880.00707,050.4089236TBB0TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP190,718.700.000.00-189,000.000.000.0028.99-1,808.100.0060.410.000.0017305EFS9CCCIT 14A6 A6402,318.480.000.000.000.000.00524.82-2,150.000.00562.260.00401,255.56084670BL1BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC702,214.570.000.000.000.000.00739.44-3,675.000.001,162.460.00700,441.4705531FAS2BB&T CORP251,079.560.000.000.000.000.00402.99-1,531.250.00838.510.00250,789.8114912L6R7CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP696,973.550.000.000.000.000.002,049.092,362.500.00894.410.00702,279.55Roll ForwardBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 88 * Weighted by: Ending Base Market Value + Accrued. * Holdings Displayed by: Lot.Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns,Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/Accretion,Change In AccruedBalanceNet Realized Gain/Loss,Base Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/Receivables,Ending Market Value +Accrued161571HC1CHAIT 162 A297,926.730.000.000.000.000.00590.790.000.00876.780.00299,394.303130AAE46FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,005,227.170.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00352.88-5,729.170.00149.120.000.003130ACLX0FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS497,124.740.000.000.000.000.001,314.502,031.250.00464.000.00500,934.4979766DKL2SAN FRANCISCO CALIF CITY & CNTY ARPTSCOMMN INTL A749,758.750.000.000.000.000.000.003,226.880.001,920.000.00754,905.6305584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2A169,898.310.000.000.00-83,874.350.002.35-46.130.00330.610.0086,310.79037833DH0APPLE INC497,115.000.000.000.000.000.001,379.742,250.000.001,114.760.00501,859.5045818WAV8INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK502,687.670.000.00-500,000.000.000.00-18.86-2,682.670.0013.860.000.00313312EK2FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS992,951.000.000.000.000.000.005,375.000.000.00666.000.00998,992.0063763QN37National Securities Clearing Corporation499,902.500.000.00-500,000.000.000.0066.110.000.0031.390.000.00313312LV0FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS982,012.000.000.000.000.000.006,425.000.000.00249.000.00988,686.0092348XAB1VZOT 18A A1B800,199.340.000.000.000.000.000.003.900.00363.520.00800,566.76313312NS5FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS978,622.000.000.000.000.000.006,700.000.000.00471.000.00985,793.00313384FR5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.001,984,067.220.000.000.000.009,907.780.000.00-25.000.001,993,950.0067983UUR2Old Line Funding, LLC0.00986,374.720.000.000.000.004,968.330.000.00403.510.00991,746.5663763QQT7National Securities Clearing Corporation0.00498,305.560.00-500,000.000.000.001,694.440.000.000.000.000.00055657AC4BMWLT 171 A3373,189.290.000.000.00-121,445.910.00632.89-73.470.00367.040.00252,669.8489237WAD9TAOT 16C A3165,848.630.000.000.00-56,749.220.00131.57-28.750.00535.580.00109,737.8192868LAB7VALET 181 A2A749,632.360.000.000.00-67,505.450.001.09-57.960.011,459.660.00683,529.70------44,497,140.2525,606,767.07-12,033,294.32-13,025,000.00-637,610.670.0099,742.078,982.24-0.0159,445.72-889.8344,575,282.52Roll ForwardBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 89 Identifier,DescriptionSecurity TypeBase Market Value Book Yield,YieldDuration -50 Basis Point Shock,-100 Basis Point Shock,-200 Basis Point Shock50 Basis Point Shock,100 Basis Point Shock,200 Basis Point Shock010831DL6ALAMEDA CNTY CALIF JT PWRS AUTH LEASE REVMUNI499,965.00 2.492.540.17500,399.98500,834.96501,704.98499,530.04499,095.09498,225.2202587AAJ3AMXCA 171 AABS496,958.30 2.822.630.86499,085.36501,212.56505,467.42494,831.39492,704.64488,451.5702665WCL3AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPCORP700,500.50 2.772.800.14700,980.35701,460.22702,420.01700,020.67699,540.85698,581.27037833DH0APPLE INCCORP498,409.50 2.942.320.61499,932.18501,454.96504,500.76496,886.90495,364.39492,319.6305522RCW6BACCT 171 AABS745,395.22 2.702.610.94748,898.71752,402.46759,410.74741,892.00738,389.03731,383.8805531FAS2BB&T CORPCORP249,496.75 3.122.710.75250,437.12251,377.02253,255.42248,555.91247,614.61245,730.60055657AC4BMWLT 171 A3ABS252,516.82 3.062.730.21252,787.02253,057.23253,597.70252,246.64251,976.46251,436.1505584PAB3BMWLT 172 A2AABS86,263.30 1.812.600.1286,315.4986,367.6886,472.0786,211.1186,158.9286,054.5606051GFE4BANK OF AMERICA CORPCORP740,000.00 2.943.630.01740,018.50740,037.00740,074.00739,981.50739,963.00739,926.0006406HCU1BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPCORP249,834.00 2.182.700.13249,991.40250,148.80250,463.63249,676.61249,519.22249,204.4707330NAL9BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COCORP449,424.00 2.672.560.11449,675.68449,927.38450,430.80449,172.33448,920.67448,417.38084670BL1BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INCCORP698,522.30 2.542.660.37699,814.59701,106.94703,691.78697,230.06695,937.87693,353.6509247XAE1BLACKROCK INCCORP711,092.20 2.812.690.68713,495.76715,899.47720,707.30708,688.78706,285.50701,479.3714041NFC0COMET 161 AABS600,084.60 2.592.560.08600,333.64600,582.67601,080.74599,835.56599,586.53599,088.4614041NFE6COMET 163 AABS249,309.08 2.682.730.20249,564.62249,820.18250,331.34249,053.54248,798.02248,287.0114041NFF3COMET 164 AABS398,121.28 2.752.600.37398,861.80399,602.35401,083.54397,380.79396,640.33395,159.50Shock AnalysisBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 90 Identifier,DescriptionSecurity TypeBase Market Value Book Yield,YieldDuration -50 Basis Point Shock,-100 Basis Point Shock,-200 Basis Point Shock50 Basis Point Shock,100 Basis Point Shock,200 Basis Point Shock14912L6R7CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPCORP698,788.30 2.562.510.13699,256.50699,724.71700,661.19698,320.12697,851.96696,915.69161571FK5CHAIT 124 AABS473,169.26 2.672.620.37474,049.37474,929.52476,689.92472,289.18471,409.14469,649.16161571HC1CHAIT 162 AABS299,211.63 2.182.670.20299,518.33299,825.04300,438.52298,904.95298,598.28297,984.98166764AR1CHEVRON CORPCORP198,679.60 3.002.690.91199,578.60200,477.53202,275.22197,780.55196,881.43195,083.0217305EFS9CCCIT 14A6 A6ABS399,440.00 2.682.630.29400,021.20400,602.41401,764.90398,858.82398,277.67397,115.4217305EFW0CCCIT 16A1 A1ABS447,504.61 2.752.630.63448,905.34450,306.15453,108.00446,103.96444,703.39441,902.4817325FAN8CITIBANK NACORP702,323.30 2.792.710.98705,771.52709,219.38716,113.98698,874.71695,425.75688,526.7222546QAC1CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON NEW YORKBRANCHCORP655,840.90 2.822.970.37657,044.39658,247.93660,655.17654,637.46653,434.06651,027.4224422ERR2JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORPCORP699,875.40 2.482.580.05700,046.87700,218.34700,561.28699,703.93699,532.46699,189.523130ABF92FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND998,315.00 2.222.400.16999,123.65999,932.321,001,549.74997,506.38996,697.78995,080.663130ACLX0FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND497,526.50 2.712.480.58498,964.39500,402.35503,278.50496,088.69494,650.95491,775.69313312EK2FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSAGCY DISC998,992.00 2.192.020.05999,226.76999,461.53999,931.05998,757.24998,522.47998,052.95313312LV0FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSAGCY DISC988,686.00 2.622.400.46990,964.97993,244.04997,802.48986,407.13984,128.36979,571.11313312NG1FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSAGCY DISC493,200.00 2.682.400.56494,573.60495,947.27498,694.84491,826.47490,453.02487,706.34313312NS5FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSAGCY DISC985,793.00 2.732.450.58988,661.73991,530.61997,268.81982,924.42980,055.98974,319.55313312QL7FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSAGCY DISC983,076.00 2.732.460.70986,506.94989,937.87996,799.74979,645.06976,214.13969,352.26Shock AnalysisBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 91 Identifier,DescriptionSecurity TypeBase Market Value Book Yield,YieldDuration -50 Basis Point Shock,-100 Basis Point Shock,-200 Basis Point Shock50 Basis Point Shock,100 Basis Point Shock,200 Basis Point Shock313370US5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND1,006,615.00 2.512.411.411,013,722.041,020,829.761,035,047.24999,508.64992,402.96978,193.63313384EC9FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY DISC999,462.00 2.421.760.03999,596.93999,731.85999,937.48999,327.07999,192.15998,922.29313384FR5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY DISC1,993,950.00 2.432.280.131,995,236.121,996,522.301,999,094.791,992,663.931,991,377.901,988,806.01313384FV6FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY DISC996,706.00 2.482.290.14997,403.71998,101.44999,496.98996,008.32995,310.66993,915.42313384LA5FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY DISC989,958.00 2.662.470.41991,992.36994,026.73998,095.45987,923.64985,889.27981,820.553133EFLA3FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDING CORPAGCY BOND496,950.00 2.732.330.55498,326.59499,703.25502,456.80495,573.49494,197.05491,444.393134G9Q75FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPAGCY BOND497,960.00 2.382.510.32498,759.24499,558.53501,157.20497,160.79496,361.62494,763.40369550BA5GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPCORP752,482.50 2.762.571.08756,553.59760,625.00768,768.78748,411.73744,341.28736,201.3440428HPN6HSBC USA INC (NEW)CORP498,734.00 3.022.790.61500,250.19501,766.48504,799.30497,217.89495,701.87492,670.09438124AC3HAROT 163 A3ABS76,518.91 2.352.960.1876,588.1676,657.4176,795.9276,449.6676,380.4176,241.9243815HAB3HAROT 183 A2ABS659,134.47 2.662.620.42660,535.16661,935.92664,737.64657,733.84656,333.28653,532.35438516BP0HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INCCORP500,083.00 2.752.730.08500,293.04500,503.09500,923.24499,872.97499,662.96499,242.964581X0CH9INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANKSUPRANATIONAL996,098.00 2.692.480.53998,757.641,001,417.411,006,737.32993,438.48990,779.09985,460.67459058FC2INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPMSUPRANATIONAL799,255.20 1.932.480.07799,550.92799,846.65800,438.10798,959.48798,663.75798,072.30459058FK4INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPMSUPRANATIONAL496,942.50 2.632.510.37497,869.32498,796.17500,649.99496,015.72495,088.98493,235.6145905UK60INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOPMSUPRANATIONAL499,956.00 2.722.470.06500,095.99500,235.98500,515.95499,816.01499,676.02499,396.05Shock AnalysisBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 92 Identifier,DescriptionSecurity TypeBase Market Value Book Yield,YieldDuration -50 Basis Point Shock,-100 Basis Point Shock,-200 Basis Point Shock50 Basis Point Shock,100 Basis Point Shock,200 Basis Point Shock47788CAB8JDOT 2018 A2ABS95,015.16 2.442.760.2695,139.1695,263.1695,511.1894,891.1794,767.1894,519.2248306BR31Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCP799,709.45 2.523.270.01799,753.43799,797.42799,885.38799,665.46799,621.48799,533.51544351MK2LOS ANGELES CALIFMUNI754,515.00 2.552.570.42756,095.75757,676.57760,838.44752,934.33751,353.73748,192.7757636QAA2MASTERCARD INCCORP500,000.00 2.461.980.01500,012.50500,025.00500,049.50499,987.50499,975.00499,950.0058772RAB0MBART 181 A2AABS496,036.72 2.732.650.42497,088.35498,140.04500,243.61494,985.15493,933.65491,830.8265478GAD2NAROT 17B A3ABS744,042.82 3.022.810.76746,851.69749,660.76755,279.51741,234.17738,425.71732,809.4267983UUR2Old Line Funding, LLCCP991,746.56 2.742.580.32993,323.47994,900.46998,054.66990,169.72988,592.95985,439.6569353RFD5PNC BANK NACORP681,319.20 2.932.870.13681,772.29682,225.39683,131.65680,866.13680,413.08679,507.0369371RM78PACCAR INCCORP699,989.50 2.482.501.34704,679.65709,370.23718,752.72695,299.79690,610.52681,233.2878607QAT2SACRAMENTO CALIF SUBN WTR DIST REVMUNI500,005.00 2.712.720.58501,445.05502,885.18505,765.66498,565.02497,125.12494,245.54797669XS2SAN FRANCISCO CALIF BAY AREA RAPID TRANDIST SALESMUNI749,062.50 2.012.530.25750,013.83750,965.19752,868.04748,111.21747,159.96745,257.5679766DKL2SAN FRANCISCO CALIF CITY & CNTY ARPTSCOMMN INTL AMUNI749,527.50 1.722.460.09749,868.54750,209.61750,891.79749,186.47748,845.47748,163.51798170AB2SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY OF THMUNI149,752.50 2.302.610.34150,004.09150,255.69150,758.93149,500.92149,249.35148,746.2589237WAD9TAOT 16C A3ABS109,682.02 1.582.760.24109,813.64109,945.27110,208.54109,550.41109,418.80109,155.5990331HNK5US BANK NACORP700,241.50 2.952.800.05700,406.06700,570.61700,899.73700,076.94699,912.39699,583.279128282K5UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV996,328.00 1.502.450.34997,996.89999,665.851,003,004.00994,659.19992,990.45989,653.20Shock AnalysisBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 93 * Weighted by: Ending Base Market Value + Accrued, except Book Yield by Base Book Value + Accrued. *The shock analysis includes a yield floor of 0.Identifier,DescriptionSecurity TypeBase Market Value Book Yield,YieldDuration -50 Basis Point Shock,-100 Basis Point Shock,-200 Basis Point Shock50 Basis Point Shock,100 Basis Point Shock,200 Basis Point Shock912828U32UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV990,977.00 2.572.450.62994,039.21997,101.581,003,226.86987,914.97984,853.11978,729.91912828U73UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV992,578.00 2.762.430.70996,047.16999,516.521,006,455.83989,109.04985,640.28978,703.3592348XAB1VZOT 18A A1BABS799,840.16 2.742.650.06800,080.11800,320.06800,799.97799,600.21799,360.26798,880.3592868LAB7VALET 181 A2AABS682,943.71 2.832.710.54684,787.71686,631.84690,320.45681,099.82679,256.05675,568.87931142EF6WALMART INCCORP699,916.00 2.692.680.23700,710.42701,504.88703,093.90699,121.61698,327.26696,738.6694975P405WELLS FRGO GOVERNMENT CL I MMFMMFUND127,190.06 2.432.430.00127,190.06127,190.07127,190.09127,190.06127,190.07127,190.09CCYUSDCashCASH1.05 0.000.000.001.051.051.051.051.051.05CCYUSDReceivableCASH874.25 0.000.000.00874.25874.25874.25874.25874.25874.25---------44,418,413.58 2.582.550.4044,506,331.7144,594,253.5344,770,043.4844,330,499.1144,242,588.3344,066,777.81Shock AnalysisBase Currency: USD01 January 2019 to 31 March 2019WC-Contra Costa CountyAccount: XXX235Primary Benchmark: ICE BofAML US 6-Month Treasury Bill IndexInvestment Strategy: Short Duration Fixed Income`The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations. Certain calculations may not be available for all time periods. Please refer to your custody statement forofficial portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.WELLS FARGO ASSET MANAGEMENTPage 94 CalTRUST c/o Gemini Fund Services LLC PO Box 541150 Omaha, NE 68154-9150 www.caltrust.org Email: CalTRUSTSupport@thegeminicompanies.com Fax: 402-963-9094 Phone: 833-CALTRUST (225-8787) Please note that this information should not be construed as tax advice and it is recommended that you consult with a tax professional regarding your account. Investment Account Summary 03/01/2019 through 03/31/2019 Page 1 of 2 0000004-0000007 PDFT 781056 SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS Fund Account Number Total Shares Owned Net Asset Value per Share on Mar 31 ($) Value on Mar 31 ($) Average Cost Amount ($) Cumulative Unrealized Gain/(Loss) ($) CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 20100000410 CalTRUST Short Term Fund 20100000410 4,547,472.068 10.03 45,611,144.84 45,499,883.48 111,261.36 CalTRUST Liquidity Fund 20100000410 95,007,249.290 1.00 95,007,249.29 95,007,249.29 0.00 Portfolios Total value as of 03/31/2019 140,618,394.13 DETAIL OF TRANSACTION ACTIVITY Activity Description Activity Date Amount ($) Amount in Shares Balance in Shares Price per Share ($) Balance ($) Average Cost Amt ($) Realized Gain/(Loss) ($) CalTRUST Short Term Fund CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Account Number: 20100000410 Beginning Balance 03/01/2019 4,547,472.068 10.02 45,565,670.12 Accrual Income Div Cash 03/29/2019 92,301.22 0.000 4,547,472.068 10.03 45,611,144.84 0.00 0.00 Unrealized Gain/(Loss)45,474.72 Closing Balance as of Mar 31 4,547,472.068 10.03 45,611,144.84 CalTRUST Liquidity Fund CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Account Number: 20100000410 Beginning Balance 03/01/2019 75,007,249.290 1.00 75,007,249.29 Redemption 03/04/2019 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.000 45,007,249.290 1.00 45,007,249.29 30,000,000.00 0.00 Redemption 03/08/2019 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.000 35,007,249.290 1.00 35,007,249.29 10,000,000.00 0.00 Purchase 03/12/2019 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.000 65,007,249.290 1.00 65,007,249.29 0.00 0.00 Purchase 03/13/2019 30,000,000.00 30,000,000.000 95,007,249.290 1.00 95,007,249.29 0.00 0.00 Accrual Income Div Cash 03/29/2019 151,496.07 0.000 95,007,249.290 1.00 95,007,249.29 0.00 0.00 Unrealized Gain/(Loss)0.00 Closing Balance as of Mar 31 95,007,249.290 1.00 95,007,249.29 Page 95 Account Select Balance Activity General Information Audit Documents Statements Bank Information Fund Yield and NAV History Holdings Assets by Fund Transactions Online Purchase Online Redemption Online Transfer Transaction Request Form Pending Trades User Maintenance Change Password Account Number: 20100000410 Account Name: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Log Out Holdings Data Fund :CalTRUST Short Term Fund  As Of Date :3/29/2019 Options Requery Export Holdings CUSIP Description Fitch Rating 3/31/2019 Moodys 3/31/2019 Mat. Date Years Shares Price Value 02007JAB3 ALLYA 2018-3 A2 Aaa 05/17/2021 2.1 4,042,474.37 100.0063 $4,042,729.05 025816BV0 AXP 0 05/17/21 A A3 05/17/2021 0.1 1,660,000.00 100.2686 $1,664,458.49 02582JGN4 AMXCA 2014-1 A AAA NR 12/15/2021 0.0 5,395,000.00 100.0412 $5,397,220.58 02665WBJ9 HNDA 0 09/09/21 A2 09/09/2021 0.2 6,500,000.00 100.4637 $6,530,141.15 02665WBS9 HNDA 0 07/20/20 A2 07/20/2020 0.1 6,000,000.00 100.1812 $6,010,872.90 03065HAB4 AMCAR 2017-3 A2A Aaa 12/18/2020 1.7 645,831.25 99.8557 $644,899.06 03065TAD4 AMCAR 2016-4 A3 AAA 07/08/2021 2.3 4,677,847.92 99.7090 $4,664,236.79 03066GAB5 AMCAR 2019-1 A2A 06/20/2022 3.2 10,000,000.00 100.1134 $10,011,336.00 03066HAB3 AMCAR 2018-1 A2A AAA 07/19/2021 2.3 4,109,491.45 99.9726 $4,108,363.81 05253JAT8 ANZ 2 1/4 11/09/20 AA- Aa3 11/09/2020 1.6 1,630,000.00 99.2503 $1,617,779.30 05531FAT0 BBT 0 01/15/20 A+ A2 01/15/2020 0.0 2,459,000.00 100.4365 $2,469,733.07 05586FEE3 BNP FLOAT 04/18/19 04/18/2019 0.1 10,000,000.00 100.0020 $10,000,200.00 05966DTD4 BANCO SANTANDER 01/29/2020 0.8 5,000,000.00 100.3278 $5,016,391.80 06051GGN3 BAC 0 07/21/21 A+ A3 07/21/2021 0.1 12,500,000.00 100.2395 $12,529,937.63 06367T4X5 BMO 0 04/13/21 AA- Aa2 04/13/2021 0.0 10,000,000.00 100.2842 $10,028,416.80 06367TYM6 BMO 0 06/15/20 AA- Aa2 06/15/2020 0.2 4,000,000.00 100.2849 $4,011,396.24 064159LH7 BNS 0 04/20/21 AA- Aa2 04/20/2021 0.1 7,000,000.00 100.3592 $7,025,144.00 06739FJK8 BACR 0 01/11/21 A+ A2 01/11/2021 0.0 5,000,000.00 99.3442 $4,967,210.65 06742TJK3 BARCLAYS BANK PLC NEW YOR 09/19/2019 0.5 10,000,000.00 100.0452 $10,004,515.60 06742TKR6 BACR FLOAT 10/15/19 10/15/2019 0.0 10,000,000.00 100.1376 $10,013,761.60 06742TKX3 BCSNY 2.84 05/08/19 05/08/2019 0.1 5,000,000.00 100.0333 $5,001,663.35 06742TLB0 BARCLAYS BANK PLC 01/31/2020 0.8 3,000,000.00 100.1556 $3,004,668.21 06742TLX2 BARCLAYS BANK PLC CD 12/05/2019 0.7 7,000,000.00 100.0916 $7,006,411.51 06744CFV8 BACR 0 08/07/20 A+ A2 08/07/2020 0.1 5,000,000.00 99.9540 $4,997,699.95 06744CFY2 BACR 0 08/07/19 A+ A2 08/07/2019 0.1 4,304,000.00 100.0992 $4,308,268.45 07274MSA4 BAYERISCHE LANDESBANK CP 05/10/2019 0.1 6,000,000.00 99.7039 $5,982,234.00 0727MAXX4 BAYERISCHE LANDESBANK 05/10/2019 0.1 3,000,000.00 100.0232 $3,000,697.20 07330NAM7 BBT 0 05/01/19 A+ A1 05/01/2019 0.0 8,000,000.00 100.0499 $8,003,995.04 07330NAP0 BBT 0 01/15/20 A+ A1 01/15/2020 0.0 2,000,000.00 100.2593 $2,005,186.10 09248U700 BLACKROCK LIQ FDS FEDFUND 0 0.0 4,724,838.10 100.0000 $4,724,838.10 130179KN3 CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY A2 04/01/2019 0.0 2,000,000.00 100.0000 $2,000,000.00 13063A7G3 CALIFORNIA ST AA- Aa3 10/01/2019 0.5 2,900,000.00 101.8430 $2,953,447.00 Page 96 CUSIP Description Fitch Rating 3/31/2019 Moodys 3/31/2019 Mat. Date Years Shares Price Value 14314RAH5 CARMX 2017-4 A2A AAA 04/15/2021 2.0 2,479,934.71 99.7669 $2,474,153.24 14314XAB5 CARMX 2018-2 A2 AAA 08/16/2021 2.4 4,727,191.25 99.9841 $4,726,438.21 14315NAJ9 CARMX 2019-1 A2B 07/15/2022 0.0 9,000,000.00 100.0890 $9,008,007.30 14913Q2P3 CAT 0 09/07/21 A A3 09/07/2021 0.2 2,225,000.00 99.8584 $2,221,849.40 161571HC1 CHAIT 2016-A2 AAA NR 06/15/2021 2.2 4,916,000.00 99.7372 $4,903,081.24 161571HJ6 CHAIT 2017-A1 A AAA NR 01/18/2022 0.0 6,000,000.00 100.1358 $6,008,149.80 161571HN7 CHAIT 2018-A1 A1 AAA 04/17/2023 0.0 8,230,000.00 99.9401 $8,225,073.52 172967KT7 C 0 06/07/19 A Baa1 06/07/2019 0.2 2,000,000.00 100.1525 $2,003,050.08 17305EFW0 CCCIT 2016-A1 A1 AAA Aaa 11/19/2021 2.6 7,425,000.00 99.4455 $7,383,826.15 17305EGB5 CCCIT 2017-A3 A3 AAA NR 04/07/2022 3.0 5,875,000.00 99.3142 $5,834,708.66 17305EGK5 CCCIT 2018-A1 A1 AAA Aaa 01/20/2023 3.8 5,400,000.00 99.8554 $5,392,189.98 17325FAK4 C 0 10/20/20 A+ A1 10/20/2020 0.1 9,500,000.00 99.9458 $9,494,846.73 21684B5J9 RABOBK FLOAT 04/05/19 04/05/2019 0.0 8,000,000.00 100.0024 $8,000,189.92 22532XKZ0 ACAFP FLOAT 07/13/20 07/13/2020 0.0 12,000,000.00 100.2759 $12,033,111.00 22546QAN7 CS 2.3 05/28/19 A A1 05/28/2019 0.2 7,500,000.00 99.9490 $7,496,175.00 22549LSK2 CS FLOAT 01/15/20 01/15/2020 0.0 6,000,000.00 100.2070 $6,012,420.00 24422ETY5 DE 0 01/08/21 A A2 01/08/2021 0.0 1,355,000.00 99.7280 $1,351,314.68 24422EUF4 DE 0 01/07/20 A A2 01/07/2020 0.0 10,000,000.00 100.1062 $10,010,620.20 24422EUN7 DE 0 07/10/20 07/10/2020 0.0 5,500,000.00 100.3830 $5,521,064.73 254683BK0 DCENT 2014-A4 A4 AAA Aaa 12/15/2021 2.7 6,815,000.00 99.8741 $6,806,422.64 26208NAB0 DRIVE 2019-1 A2A 09/15/2021 2.5 8,253,000.00 100.1205 $8,262,943.21 26208RAB1 DRIVE 2019-2 A2A 03/15/2022 3.0 7,850,000.00 100.0479 $7,853,757.80 26209BAB5 DRIVE 2018-4 A2A Aaa 10/15/2020 1.6 2,721,579.98 99.9976 $2,721,515.48 263534CM9 DD 0 05/01/20 A A3 05/01/2020 0.1 5,800,000.00 100.2836 $5,816,448.39 29270CYM1 ENERGY N W WA ELEC REVENU AA Aa1 07/01/2019 0.3 0.00 0.0000 $0.00 34528FAB4 FORDO 2018-A A2A AAA 02/15/2021 1.9 4,554,017.51 99.9722 $4,552,750.13 34528QDW1 FORDF 2015-2 A1 AAA Aaa 01/15/2022 2.8 2,719,000.00 99.3618 $2,701,647.07 34532EAE5 FORDO 2016-B A4 08/15/2021 2.4 7,691,000.00 99.1882 $7,628,566.00 34532FAB8 FORDL 2019-A A2A MTGE 09/15/2021 2.5 8,000,000.00 100.0827 $8,006,612.00 34533FAD3 FORDO 2019-A A3 09/15/2023 4.5 6,075,000.00 100.4625 $6,103,095.05 369550BA5 GD 2 7/8 05/11/20 WD A2 05/11/2020 1.1 10,385,000.00 100.3310 $10,419,374.35 369550BF4 GD 0 05/11/21 WD A2 05/11/2021 0.1 2,750,000.00 100.4244 $2,761,672.24 375558BB8 GILD 2.55 09/01/20 A3 09/01/2020 1.4 16,000,000.00 99.8683 $15,978,920.48 38141GVV3 GS 0 04/25/19 A A3 04/25/2019 0.1 11,293,000.00 100.0677 $11,300,646.72 40434CAC9 HSBC 2 1/4 06/23/19 AA- A2 06/23/2019 0.2 2,500,000.00 99.8813 $2,497,032.98 43811BAC8 HAROT 2017-2 A3 08/16/2021 2.4 2,508,849.98 99.3017 $2,491,330.68 438124AD1 HAROT 2016-3 A4 Aaa 11/18/2022 3.6 7,955,000.00 99.1334 $7,886,061.97 43814PAC4 HAROT 2017-3 A3 AAA 09/20/2021 2.5 2,152,000.00 99.3477 $2,137,961.64 43814UAF6 HAROT 2018-2 A2 AAA 12/18/2020 1.7 7,617,650.56 100.0193 $7,619,123.05 44932HAE3 IBM 0 01/20/21 A A1 01/20/2021 0.1 3,000,000.00 100.0312 $3,000,937.26 459058GK3 IBRD FLOAT 08/21/20 Aaa 08/21/2020 0.0 11,000,000.00 99.9850 $10,998,350.00 46625HHL7 JPM 6.3 04/23/19 AA- A2 04/23/2019 0.1 8,000,000.00 100.1940 $8,015,517.28 46625HHS2 JPM 4.4 07/22/20 AA- A2 07/22/2020 1.3 10,000,000.00 102.2442 $10,224,418.70 46647PAC0 JPM 0 03/09/21 AA- A2 03/09/2021 0.2 5,000,000.00 100.0951 $5,004,757.45 46647PAT3 JPM 0 06/18/22 AA- A2 06/18/2022 0.2 2,290,000.00 99.8851 $2,287,368.38 47788BAB0 JOHN DEERE OWNER TRUST AAA Aaa 04/15/2020 1.0 283,253.56 99.9473 $283,104.20 53947BB25 LLOYDS FLOAT 07/15/20 07/15/2020 0.0 8,000,000.00 99.9220 $7,993,760.00 55279HAG5 MTB 2 1/4 07/25/19 A A3 07/25/2019 0.2 550,000.00 99.8740 $549,307.00 55379WWT9 MUFG BANK LTD/NY 08/15/2019 0.4 10,000,000.00 100.1285 $10,012,847.30 Page 97 CUSIP Description Fitch Rating 3/31/2019 Moodys 3/31/2019 Mat. Date Years Shares Price Value 55379WXW1 MUFG FLOAT 10/24/19 10/24/2019 0.1 5,000,000.00 100.0551 $5,002,756.05 55379WYA8 MUFG FLOAT 01/25/21 01/25/2021 0.1 5,000,000.00 100.1754 $5,008,767.50 59157UVL1 METLIFE SHORT TERM FDG 08/20/2019 0.4 5,000,000.00 98.9696 $4,948,480.00 606822AX2 MUFG 0 07/26/21 A A1 07/26/2021 0.1 3,000,000.00 100.1758 $3,005,273.70 61747YDX0 MS 0 01/27/20 A A3 01/27/2020 0.1 5,095,000.00 100.6474 $5,127,984.72 63873ND24 NATIXIS NY BRANCH 05/06/2019 0.1 10,000,000.00 100.0427 $10,004,273.10 65474VAM3 NMOTR 2017-A A AAA Aaa 04/15/2021 0.0 4,370,000.00 100.0065 $4,370,284.05 65474VAN1 NMOTR 2017-B A AAA Aaa 04/18/2022 0.0 10,260,000.00 100.1584 $10,276,250.81 65474VAP6 NMOTR 2017-C A AAA Aaa 10/17/2022 0.0 9,210,000.00 100.0500 $9,214,600.40 65474VAQ4 NMOTR 2019-A A 02/15/2024 0.0 3,070,000.00 100.3086 $3,079,474.02 65475WAE8 NAROT 2015-B A4 01/17/2022 2.8 3,438,564.83 99.6349 $3,426,009.25 65478AAE3 NAROT 2015-C A4 02/15/2022 2.9 4,742,000.00 99.4560 $4,716,205.42 65478DAB3 NAROT 2018-A A2A Aaa 12/15/2020 1.7 3,826,801.38 99.8923 $3,822,678.38 65478GAB6 NAROT 2017-B A2A AAA Aaa 05/15/2020 1.1 2,843,871.90 99.8621 $2,839,951.34 65478GAD2 NAROT 2017-B A3 AAA Aaa 10/15/2021 2.6 3,965,000.00 99.2057 $3,933,506.40 65478VAD9 NAROT 2016-B A3 AAA Aaa 01/15/2021 1.8 1,545,186.90 99.5113 $1,537,635.57 65590AUR5 NDASS FLOAT 04/05/19 04/05/2019 0.0 8,000,000.00 100.0024 $8,000,189.92 69353RFD5 PNC 0 05/19/20 A+ A2 05/19/2020 0.1 2,025,000.00 100.1940 $2,028,927.87 69353RFK9 PNC 0 01/22/21 A+ A2 01/22/2021 0.1 5,280,000.00 99.9030 $5,274,877.45 69371RP34 PCAR 0 05/10/21 A1 05/10/2021 0.1 4,135,000.00 100.0476 $4,136,968.80 73358WT53 PORT AUTH OF NEW YORK & N AA- Aa3 09/15/2019 0.5 0.00 0.0000 $0.00 735389MT2 PORT OF SEATTLE WA REVENU AA Aa2 05/01/2036* 0.1 0.00 0.0000 $0.00 78012KC62 RY 2 1/8 03/02/20 AA Aa2 03/02/2020 0.9 6,000,000.00 99.4981 $5,969,888.40 80283LAQ6 SANUK 0 11/03/20 A Aa3 11/03/2020 0.1 8,340,000.00 99.8711 $8,329,247.91 80284YAD6 SDART 2017-3 A3 AAA 06/15/2021 2.2 3,027,228.31 99.9314 $3,025,150.12 80285FAB0 SDART 2018-2 A2A MTGE AAA Aaa 10/15/2020 1.6 2,240,835.19 99.9855 $2,240,509.60 80285GAB8 SDART 2018-3 A2A Aaa 03/15/2021 2.0 3,340,744.26 99.9750 $3,339,910.41 80285HAB6 SDART 2019-1 A2A 01/18/2022 2.8 5,210,000.00 100.0438 $5,212,279.90 83369YW36 SOCIETE GENERALE NY 07/24/2019 0.3 12,000,000.00 100.1357 $12,016,280.52 85325TC86 STANDARD CHARTERED BANK N 04/17/2019 0.1 8,000,000.00 100.0097 $8,000,773.44 85325TS71 STANLN FLOAT 04/24/19 04/24/2019 0.1 11,000,000.00 100.0126 $11,001,382.92 86563YWP4 SUMIBK FLOAT 05/15/19 05/15/2019 0.1 3,000,000.00 100.0536 $3,001,606.92 86564FGY3 SUMITR FLOAT 08/16/19 08/16/2019 0.1 7,000,000.00 100.0549 $7,003,842.93 86564FKJ1 SUMITR FLOAT 04/05/19 04/05/2019 0.0 8,500,000.00 100.0015 $8,500,131.41 86564FQL0 SUMITOMO MITSUI BANK NY 04/26/2019 0.1 12,000,000.00 100.0255 $12,003,063.24 86564FTG8 SUMITOMO MITSUI TR BK LTD 06/27/2019 0.2 10,000,000.00 100.0011 $10,000,110.10 86958J2S7 SHBASS FLOAT 12/19/19 12/19/2019 0.2 10,000,000.00 100.1270 $10,012,702.40 86960BAS1 SHBASS 0 09/08/20 AA Aa2 09/08/2020 0.2 2,310,000.00 100.0697 $2,311,609.63 89237KAD5 TAOT 2016-A A3 Aaa 03/16/2020 1.0 200,651.50 99.8934 $200,437.51 89238KAD4 TAOT 2017-D A3 Aaa 01/18/2022 2.8 10,905,000.00 99.2769 $10,826,142.67 89238TAC7 TAOT 2018-B A2B Aaa 03/15/2021 0.0 10,758,186.84 100.0162 $10,759,929.67 *The underlying security is defeased by U.S. Treasuries with a prerefunded maturity date of 5/1/19. Page 98 CUSIP Description Fitch Rating 3/31/2019 Moodys 3/31/2019 Mat. Date Years Shares Price Value 90261XHF2 UBS 0 08/14/19 AA- Aa3 08/14/2019 0.1 15,000,000.00 100.2235 $15,033,531.75 90331HNK5 USB 0 01/17/20 AA- A1 01/17/2020 0.1 5,000,000.00 100.0345 $5,001,726.55 90331HNU3 USB 3.05 07/24/20 AA- A1 07/24/2020 1.2 10,000,000.00 100.6081 $10,060,812.40 90333VZN3 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCI 07/23/2019 0.3 11,000,000.00 100.1148 $11,012,623.27 911312BH8 UPS 0 04/01/21 A1 04/01/2021 0.0 8,415,000.00 99.8204 $8,399,890.62 912796QH5 B 0 05/23/19 F1+05/23/2019 0.2 45,000,000.00 99.6613 $44,847,575.10 912796QM4 B 0 06/20/19 F1+06/20/2019 0.2 45,000,000.00 99.4747 $44,763,600.15 9128283N8 T 1 7/8 12/31/19 AAA Aaa 12/31/2019 0.8 55,000,000.00 99.5783 $54,768,056.75 9128283Y4 US TREASURY N/B AAA Aaa 02/29/2020 0.9 15,000,000.00 99.8594 $14,978,906.25 912828G61 T 1 1/2 11/30/19 AAA Aaa 11/30/2019 0.7 44,000,000.00 99.3750 $43,725,000.00 912828U73 T 1 3/8 12/15/19 AAA Aaa 12/15/2019 0.7 52,000,000.00 99.2578 $51,614,062.24 912828UB4 US TREASURY N/B AAA Aaa 11/30/2019 0.7 53,000,000.00 98.9310 $52,433,410.35 912828UF5 UNITED STATES TREA NTS AAA 12/31/2019 0.8 55,000,000.00 99.0352 $54,469,335.80 912828W63 T 1 5/8 03/15/20 AAA Aaa 03/15/2020 1.0 90,000,000.00 99.2617 $89,335,547.10 91324PCM2 UNH 2.7 07/15/20 A- A3 07/15/2020 1.3 7,394,000.00 100.2067 $7,409,285.25 91324PDB5 UNH 0 10/15/20 A- A3 10/15/2020 0.0 4,790,000.00 99.9281 $4,786,555.13 91476PQM3 UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA/TH AA-07/01/2019 0.3 0.00 0.0000 $0.00 931142EH2 WMT 0 06/23/21 AA Aa2 06/23/2021 0.2 1,330,000.00 100.3585 $1,334,768.05 94974BFU9 WFC 2 1/8 04/22/19 A+ A2 04/22/2019 0.1 1,850,000.00 99.9699 $1,849,443.32 94974BGN4 WFC 0 07/22/20 A+ A2 07/22/2020 0.1 1,150,000.00 100.7969 $1,159,164.29 94988J5N3 WFC 2.6 01/15/21 AA- Aa2 01/15/2021 1.8 6,105,000.00 99.7124 $6,087,440.92 94989RD70 WFC FLOAT 04/05/19 04/05/2019 0.0 8,000,000.00 100.0028 $8,000,223.36 94989RF94 WFC FLOAT 04/23/19 04/23/2019 0.1 7,800,000.00 100.0155 $7,801,210.25 94989RY69 WFC FLOAT 04/15/19 04/15/2019 0.0 10,000,000.00 100.0067 $10,000,674.90 96130AAC2 WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATI 06/21/2019 0.2 11,500,000.00 100.0247 $11,502,845.22 USD US DOLLARS 0 0.0 0.00 1.0000 $0.00 If you have any questions regarding your account please contact Shareholder Services at: 833-CAL-TRUST (833-225-8787) Page 99 Account Select Balance Activity General Information Audit Documents Statements Bank Information Fund Yield and NAV History Holdings Assets by Fund Transactions Online Purchase Online Redemption Online Transfer Transaction Request Form Pending Trades User Maintenance Change Password Account Number: 20100000410 Account Name: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Log Out Holdings Data Fund :CalTRUST Liquidity Fund  As Of Date :3/29/2019 Options Requery Export Holdings CUSIP Description Fitch Rating 3/31/2019 Moodys 3/31/2019 Mat. Date Years Shares Price Value 02665WCK5 HNDA 0 06/24/19 A2 06/24/2019 0.2 910,000.00 100.0000 $910,000.00 04821UT51 ATLANTIC ASSET SECURITIZA 06/05/2019 0.2 5,000,000.00 99.5180 $4,975,898.61 05253JAN1 ANZ 1.6 07/15/19 AA- Aa3 07/15/2019 0.3 2,500,000.00 99.6111 $2,490,276.88 05586FDA2 BNP FLOAT 04/04/19 04/04/2019 0.0 2,500,000.00 100.0000 $2,500,000.00 06370RQX0 BANK OF MONTREAL CHICAGO 12/10/2019 0.0 2,000,000.00 100.0000 $2,000,000.00 06370RRR2 BMO FLOAT 01/17/20 01/17/2020 0.1 1,500,000.00 100.0000 $1,500,000.00 06371EEP8 BMO FLOAT 07/11/19 07/11/2019 0.0 2,500,000.00 100.0884 $2,502,209.86 06371EYK7 BANK MONTREAL CHC CD FLT 06/13/2019 0.0 300,000.00 99.9981 $299,994.19 06417G3B2 BNS FLOAT 05/16/19 05/16/2019 0.0 2,000,000.00 100.0000 $2,000,000.00 06417G3C0 BNS FLOAT 09/20/19 09/20/2019 0.2 3,000,000.00 100.0000 $3,000,000.00 06742TLL8 BARCLAYS BANK PLC 05/08/2019 0.1 3,500,000.00 100.0000 $3,500,000.00 07644DGY8 BEDFDG 0 08/02/19 08/02/2019 0.0 2,500,000.00 100.0000 $2,500,000.00 07646KDN7 BEDFDG 0 06/19/19 06/19/2019 0.2 2,500,000.00 100.0000 $2,500,000.00 09248U700 BLACKROCK LIQ FDS FEDFUND 0 0.0 16,551,847.07 100.0000 $16,551,847.07 1247P3SE3 CAFCO LLC 0% CP 05/14/2019 0.1 3,500,000.00 99.6763 $3,488,668.75 13606BH58 CM FLOAT 07/25/19 07/25/2019 0.1 600,000.00 100.0000 $600,000.00 13606BZL3 CM FLOAT 07/16/19 07/16/2019 0.0 800,000.00 100.0000 $800,000.00 15963URW8 CHARIOT FDG LLC 0% CP 04/30/2019 0.1 2,500,000.00 99.7572 $2,493,929.17 15963UTB2 CHARIOT FDG LLC 0% CP 06/11/2019 0.2 4,000,000.00 99.3957 $3,975,828.89 15963UVD5 CHARIOT FDG LLC 0% CP 08/13/2019 0.4 3,500,000.00 99.0140 $3,465,490.00 16115WS65 CHARTA LLC CP 02/15/2019 05/06/2019 0.1 1,850,000.00 99.7040 $1,844,524.00 16115WUN5 CHARTA LLC 0% CP 07/22/2019 0.3 3,000,000.00 99.1165 $2,973,495.00 19121BXR5 COCA COLA CO 0% CP 10/25/2019 0.6 2,250,000.00 98.5022 $2,216,298.75 22536UTL4 CICFP FLOAT 05/08/19 05/08/2019 0.0 2,500,000.00 100.0000 $2,500,000.00 22845AGD6 CPSERA 2.92 05/06/19 05/06/2019 0.0 2,000,000.00 100.0000 $2,000,000.00 23328AG24 DG BK N Y BRH CD 2.72%19 06/17/2019 0.2 4,000,000.00 100.0018 $4,000,072.61 Page 100 CUSIP Description Fitch Rating 3/31/2019 Moodys 3/31/2019 Mat. Date Years Shares Price Value 25214T5X9 DEXIA CREDIT LOCAL CP 09/23/2019 0.5 3,000,000.00 98.6430 $2,959,290.00 44988GAB4 INGFDL 0 12/02/19 CP 12/02/2019 0.1 4,000,000.00 100.0000 $4,000,000.00 44988KFW4 ING (US) FUNDING LLC 04/12/2019 0.0 500,000.00 100.0000 $500,000.00 44988KGN3 ING (US) FUNDING LLC 05/21/2019 0.1 3,000,000.00 100.0000 $3,000,000.00 4820P3SU8 JUPITER SECURITIZATION 05/28/2019 0.2 2,500,000.00 99.5165 $2,487,913.20 53127USD3 LIBERTY STR FDG CORP 0% C 05/13/2019 0.1 1,500,000.00 99.6847 $1,495,270.00 55379WZM1 MUFG FLOAT 02/24/20 02/24/2020 0.2 1,200,000.00 100.0000 $1,200,000.00 59157UVL1 METLIFE SHORT TERM FDG 08/20/2019 0.4 5,000,000.00 98.9434 $4,947,169.45 59157UW97 METLIFE SHORT TERM FDG LL 09/09/2019 0.4 4,000,000.00 98.8273 $3,953,092.23 60683BNF6 MUFG FLOAT 06/04/19 06/04/2019 0.0 2,600,000.00 100.0000 $2,600,000.00 60683BPF4 MITSUBISHI UFJ TRUST AND 06/07/2019 0.2 3,500,000.00 100.0038 $3,500,133.01 60700A7C2 MIZUHO BANK LTD NY BRA CD 07/30/2019 0.1 4,000,000.00 100.0000 $4,000,000.00 60700AY99 MIZUHO FLOAT 04/18/19 04/18/2019 0.1 6,000,000.00 99.9970 $5,999,822.19 63254AAQ1 NAB 1 3/8 07/12/19 Aa3 07/12/2019 0.3 2,000,000.00 99.5620 $1,991,239.96 63763QTC1 NATL SEC CLEARING CORP 0%06/12/2019 0.2 3,000,000.00 99.4051 $2,982,153.60 64105HW32 NESTLE CAP CORP 0% CP 09/03/2019 0.4 4,000,000.00 98.8574 $3,954,295.55 67983UUR2 OLD LINE FUNDING LLC 07/25/2019 0.3 3,000,000.00 99.1160 $2,973,480.00 69033MFL6 OCBCSP FLOAT 11/07/19 11/07/2019 0.1 5,000,000.00 100.0000 $5,000,000.00 76582KRH6 RIDGEFIELD FDG CO LLC IAM 04/17/2019 0.1 2,000,000.00 99.8625 $1,997,250.00 76582KS77 RIDGEFIELD FDG CO LLC 05/07/2019 0.1 2,000,000.00 99.6939 $1,993,877.78 76582KTB7 RIDGEFIELD FDG CO LLC IAM 06/11/2019 0.2 3,000,000.00 99.3917 $2,981,750.00 78012UFB6 RY FLOAT 08/16/19 08/16/2019 0.0 700,000.00 100.0000 $700,000.00 82619UTS3 SIEMENS CAP CO LLC 0% CP 06/26/2019 0.2 3,000,000.00 99.3840 $2,981,520.00 83050F5M9 SKANDINAVISKA ENSKILDA CD 07/15/2019 0.3 4,500,000.00 100.0391 $4,501,758.01 83050FS77 SKANDINAVISKA ENSKILDA 05/03/2019 0.1 800,000.00 99.9994 $799,995.22 83369YX76 SOCGEN FLOAT 06/12/19 06/12/2019 0.0 2,000,000.00 100.0000 $2,000,000.00 85325T3A1 STANDARD CHARTERED BANK 10/23/2019 0.6 2,500,000.00 100.0000 $2,500,000.00 86563YWP4 SUMIBK FLOAT 05/15/19 05/15/2019 0.1 3,400,000.00 100.0359 $3,401,219.36 86564FKJ1 SUMITR FLOAT 04/05/19 04/05/2019 0.0 1,000,000.00 100.0000 $1,000,000.00 86564FVB6 SUMITOMO MITSUI TR BK LTD 06/20/2019 0.2 4,000,000.00 99.9998 $3,999,993.36 86565BPF2 SUMIBK FLOAT 04/18/19 04/18/2019 0.1 1,000,000.00 99.9999 $999,998.73 86958J2S7 12/19/2019 0.2 3,000,000.00 100.0000 $3,000,000.00 Page 101 CUSIP Description Fitch Rating 3/31/2019 Moodys 3/31/2019 Mat. Date Years Shares Price Value SHBASS FLOAT 12/19/19 86958JC98 SHBASS FLOAT 10/21/19 10/21/2019 0.1 2,000,000.00 100.0760 $2,001,520.33 86958JF20 SVENSKA HANDELSBANKEN 05/07/2019 0.1 501,000.00 100.0017 $501,008.57 86958JPR4 SVENSKA HANDELSBANKEN CD 06/07/2019 0.2 1,100,000.00 100.0186 $1,100,204.18 86958JX61 SVENSKA HANDELSBANKEN AB 05/07/2019 0.0 1,500,000.00 100.0000 $1,500,000.00 87019VTQ0 SWEDBANK (NEW YORK)05/21/2019 0.1 1,500,000.00 100.0000 $1,500,000.00 88602UT34 THUNDER BAY FDG LLC 0% CP 06/03/2019 0.2 3,500,000.00 99.4746 $3,481,610.42 89114MAF4 TORONTO- DOMINION BANK CD 08/07/2019 0.4 1,500,000.00 100.0000 $1,500,000.00 89114MBE6 TORONTO DOMINION BANK NY 06/14/2019 0.2 2,000,000.00 100.0000 $2,000,000.00 89114MLL9 TORONTO DOMINION BANK NY 06/09/2019 0.0 2,200,000.00 100.0000 $2,200,000.00 90261XHF2 UBS 0 08/14/19 AA- Aa3 08/14/2019 0.1 5,700,000.00 100.2560 $5,714,593.46 912796UY3 B 0 04/23/19 F1+04/23/2019 0.1 15,000,000.00 99.8384 $14,975,760.00 CITREP 03/29/2019 CGI 2.44 29-MAR- 2019 03/29/2019 0.0 0.00 0.0000 $0.00 CITREP 04/01/2019 CGI 2.62 01-APR- 2019 04/01/2019 0.0 60,000,000.00 100.0000 $60,000,000.00 MERREP 03/28/2019 MER 2.40 28-MAR- 2019 03/28/2019 0.0 0.00 0.0000 $0.00 MERREP 03/29/2019 MER 2.44 29-MAR- 2019 03/29/2019 0.0 0.00 0.0000 $0.00 MERREP 04/01/2019 MER 2.60 01-APR- 2019 04/01/2019 0.0 62,000,000.00 100.0000 $62,000,000.00 MIZREP 03/29/2019 MIZ 2.44 29-MAR- 2019 03/29/2019 0.0 0.00 0.0000 $0.00 MIZREP 04/01/2019 MIZ 2.62 01-APR- 2019 04/01/2019 0.0 20,000,000.00 100.0000 $20,000,000.00 USD US DOLLARS 0 0.0 0.00 1.0000 $0.00 If you have any questions regarding your account please contact Shareholder Services at: 833-CAL-TRUST (833-225-8787) Page 102 SECTION III APPENDIX B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL – MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED PARTIES B. 6. EAST BAY REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY (EBRCS) EBRCS TRANSACTIONS* For the Quarter Ending March 31, 2019 FY 2018-2019 FUND BALANCE @ TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date BALANCE @ NUMBER 12/31/19 03/31/19 100300 1,769,666.58 1,769,666.58 TOTALS 1,769,666.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,769,666.58 * East Bay Regional Communications System Authority Page 103 EXHIBITS Exhibit ICONTRA COSTA COUNTYPortfolio Summary ReportAS OF MARCH 31, 2019Portfolio CharacteristicsPar $3,724,111,094.19Cost $3,705,990,210.95Market Value $3,714,678,674.24Weighted Yield to Maturity 2.48%Weighted Average Days to Maturity 173 Weighted Duration 0.46yrPortfolio Breakdown by InvestmentInvestments Par Value Percent of TotalU.S. Treasuries$128,480,000.003.45%U.S.Agencies626,770,000.0016.83%Supranationals327,379,000.008.79%Money Market1,723,432,397.2246.28%Corporate Notes319,981,000.008.59%PFM127,188,084.783.42%LAIF209,835,760.855.63%Wells Cap44,531,651.231.20%CalTRUST140,618,394.133.78%Other 1,769,666.580.05%Cash74,125,139.401.99%TOTAL* $3,724,111,094.19 100.00% **Maturity DistributionTime Par Value Percent of TotalLess 1 yr$3,133,114,041.7184.13%1 to 2 yrs392,213,298.5710.53%2 to 3 yrs150,697,176.134.05%3 to 4 yrs41,118,000.001.10%4+ yrs6,968,577.780.19%TOTAL* $3,724,111,094.19 100.00% *** Does not include the Futuris Public Entity Trust of the Contra Costa Community College District Retirement Board of Authority** May or may not total to 100% due to roundingU.S. Treasuries3.45%U.S.Agencies16.83%Supranationals8.79%Money Market46.28%Corporate Notes8.59%PFM3.42%LAIF5.63%Wells Cap1.20%CalTRUST3.78%Other 0.05%Cash1.99%PORTFOLIO BREAKDOWNBY INVESTMENTLess 1 yr84.13%1 to 2 yrs10.53%2 to 3 yrs4.05%3 to 4 yrs1.10%4+ yrs0.19%MATURITY DISTRIBUTION Exhibit IICONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOLPERFORMANCE SUMMARYAS OF MARCH 31, 2019AVERAGE DAYS TO3 PERCENT OFMATURITY AT PARPORTFOLIOYTMEND-OF-QUARTERDURATION($) (%) (%) (day) (year)A. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office1$3,126,042,397.22 83.98% 2.4951% 178 0.482B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors31. PFM$127,188,084.78 3.42% 2.1335% 605 1.4222. Local Agency Investment Fund $209,835,760.85 5.64% 2.3900% 1 N/A3. Wells Capital Management $44,531,651.23 1.20% 2.5500% 234 0.4044. CalTRUST Short-Term Fund $45,611,144.84 1.23% 2.5100%510.005. CalTRUST Liquidity Fund $95,007,249.29 2.55% 2.5300%500.00C. Cash$74,125,139.40 1.99% 2.40%600.003 Yield to Maturity on Portfolio at End-of-Quarter = 2.48%3 Weighted Average Days to Maturity on Portfolio at End-of-Quarter = 1733 Weighted Duration (yr) at End-of-Quarter =0.461. Excludes the funds managed by PFM.2. Data is provided by FIS.3. Excludes: Section B.6.a (EBRCS Bond) of the Investment Pool summary report and Futuris Public Entity Trust.4. Data provided by Wells Capital Management.5. 30 day SEC Yield.6. Wells Fargo Bank Average Earnings Credit Rate on Investable Balance for the quarter.LAIF and CalTRUST Short Term Fund are subject to a one day call of principal provision. CalTRUST Liquidity Fund provides a same day liquidity provision.WEIGHTED Exhibit III CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL As of March 31, 2019As of December 31, 2018CHANGE IN VALUETYPEPAR VALUEPAR VALUEFROM PREV. QTR.% CHANGEA. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office 1. U.S. Treasuries (STRIPS, Bills, Notes) $128,480,000.00 $108,130,000.00 $20,350,000.0018.82% 2. U.S. Agencies Federal Home Loan Banks 286,313,000.00 248,060,000.0038,253,000.0015.42% Federal National Mortgage Association 37,303,000.00 59,135,000.00 (21,832,000.00)-36.92% Federal Farm Credit Banks175,122,000.00 168,622,000.00 6,500,000.003.85% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 128,032,000.00 153,032,000.00 (25,000,000.00)-16.34% Subtotal 626,770,000.00 628,849,000.00 (2,079,000.00)-0.33% 3. Supranationals 327,379,000.00 302,479,000.00 24,900,000.007.61% 4. Money Market Instruments Commercial Paper 1,057,489,000.001,027,150,000.00 30,339,000.002.95% Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 665,940,000.00 880,640,000.00 (214,700,000.00)-24.38% Time Deposit 3,397.22 3,397.22 0.000.00% Subtotal 1,723,432,397.22 1,907,793,397.22 (184,361,000.00)-9.66% 5. Corporate Notes 319,981,000.00 256,023,000.00 63,958,000.0024.98%TOTAL (Section A)3,126,042,397.22 3,203,274,397.22 -77,232,000.00-2.41%B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors 1. PFM 127,188,084.78 155,417,644.68 (28,229,559.90)-18.16% 2. Local Agency Investment Fund 209,835,760.85 227,748,174.98 (17,912,414.13)-7.87% 3. Wells Capital Management 44,531,651.23 44,568,630.10 (36,978.87)-0.08% 4. CalTRUST (Short Term Fund)45,611,144.84 45,494,700.70 116,444.140.26% 5. CalTRUST (Liquidity Fund) 95,007,249.29 85,007,249.29 10,000,000.0011.76% 6. Other a. EBRCS Bond 1,769,666.58 1,769,666.58 0.000.00%TOTAL (Section B)523,943,557.57 560,006,066.33 (36,062,508.76)-6.44%C. Cash74,125,139.40 54,844,512.61 19,280,626.7935.16%* GRAND TOTAL (FOR A , B, & C)$3,724,111,094.19 $3,818,124,976.16 ($94,013,881.97)-2.46%* Excludes the Futuris Public Entity Trust of the Contra Costa Community College District Retirement Board of Authority CONTRA COSTA INVESTMENT POOLINVESTMENTS MANAGED BY TREASURER'S OFFICEQUARTERLY COUPON RATES, YIELD TO MATURITYExhibit IV QuarterEndingFiscal YearSeptemberDecemberMarch June2018/19Coupon Rate2.0195% 2.4143% 2.3996%Yield to Maturity2.0983% 2.4912% 2.4951%2017/18Coupon Rate1.3142% 1.3991% 1.6907% 1.9356%Yield to Maturity1.3307% 1.4333% 1.7091% 1.9758%2016/17Coupon Rate1.0063% 1.0436% 1.1392% 1.2330%Yield to Maturity0.9760% 1.0418% 1.1420% 1.2552%2015/16Coupon Rate0.6433% 0.7270% 0.8556% 0.9341%Yield to Maturity0.5859% 0.6955% 0.8251% 0.9043%2014/15Coupon Rate0.5437% 0.4624% 0.4912% 0.5309%Yield to Maturity0.4605% 0.4185% 0.4379% 0.4894%2013/14Coupon Rate0.6331% 0.4843% 0.4686% 0.4802%Yield to Maturity0.4645% 0.3709% 0.3680% 0.3877%2012/13Coupon Rate0.8304% 0.5568% 0.5829% 0.5838%Yield to Maturity0.6012% 0.3947% 0.4243% 0.4229%2011/12Coupon Rate0.8769% 0.8385% 0.8122% 0.7426%Yield to Maturity0.6842% 0.6658% 0.6739% 0.6130%2010/11Coupon Rate0.9802% 0.7132% 0.7326% 0.6982%Yield to Maturity0.7494% 0.5866% 0.6133% 0.5612%2009/10Coupon Rate1.2464% 0.8931% 0.8610% 0.8212%Yield to Maturity1.1095% 0.7840% 0.7373% 0.6993%2008/09Coupon Rate4.4019% 1.7623% 1.2918% 1.2418%Yield to Maturity4.2819% 1.6574% 1.1808% 1.1231%Source: All data is calculated by Sungard.Excludes funds managed by PFM beginging 9/2018 CONTRA COSTA INVESTMENT POOLINVESTMENTS MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTORLAIF QUARTERLY APPORTIONMENT RATESExhibit IV (a)Quarter EndingFiscal Year September December March June2018/19 Apportionment Rate 2.16% 2.40% 2.55%2017/18 Apportionment Rate 1.08% 1.20% 1.51% 1.90%2016/17 Apportionment Rate 0.60% 0.68% 0.78% 0.92%2015/16 Apportionment Rate 0.32% 0.37% 0.46% 0.55%2014/15 Apportionment Rate 0.24% 0.25% 0.26% 0.28%2013/14 Apportionment Rate 0.26% 0.26% 0.23% 0.22%2012/13 Apportionment Rate 0.35% 0.32% 0.28% 0.24%2011/12 Apportionment Rate 0.38% 0.38% 0.38% 0.36%2010/11 Apportionment Rate 0.51% 0.46% 0.50% 0.48%2009/10 Apportionment Rate 0.90% 0.60% 0.56% 0.56%2008/09 Apportionment Rate 2.77% 2.54% 1.91% 1.51%Source: Contra Costa County Treasurer's Quarterly Investment Report - LAIF Statements Exhibit IV (b)0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%5.50%Contra Costa County Investment Poolas of March 31, 2019TTC "Coupon"TTC "YTM"LAIF Exhibit IV (c)-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%4/1/19 9/28/19 3/26/20 9/22/20 3/21/21 9/17/21 3/16/22 9/12/22 3/11/23Yield to Maturity Maturity DatesRisk Assessmentas of March 31, 2019CountyTreasurerPFMWells CapitalMgmtUS TreasuriesYield Curve2 Standard Deviations1 Standard Deviation-1 Standard Deviation-2 Standard Deviations1 year2 years3 years5 years Exhibit IV (d)CUSIPDESCRIPTIONPARCOST MARKETCOUPON (%)MATURITY DATEYTM (%)3137EADZ9 CCCCD GOV FHLMC NOTE 6,000,000.00 5,998,800.00 5,996,880.00 1.13% 4/15/2019 1.13%912828ST8 RM GOV US TREASURY N 5,000,000.00 5,021,875.00 4,994,750.00 1.25% 4/30/2019 1.14%458182DX7 SUP INTER-AMERICAN D 10,000,000.00 9,988,600.00 9,980,800.00 1.00% 5/13/2019 1.04%3130ABF92 CCCCD GOV FHLB NOTES 2,000,000.00 2,000,220.00 1,996,640.00 1.38% 5/28/2019 1.37%3133EGCA1 GOV FFCB NOTES 10,000,000.00 9,976,400.00 9,977,700.00 1.06% 6/3/2019 1.14%3134G9QW0 GOV FHLMC NOTES 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 9,976,500.00 1.28% 6/14/2019 1.28%3130A8DB6 CCCCD GOV FHLB GLOBA2,365,000.00 2,372,544.35 2,358,283.40 1.13% 6/21/2019 1.02%3133EGJC0 GOV FFCB NOTES 10,000,000.00 9,985,200.00 9,965,300.00 0.95% 7/1/2019 1.00%3135G0P49 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTES 1,995,000.00 1,993,803.00 1,983,089.85 1.00% 8/28/2019 1.02%3135G0P49 CCCCD GOV FNMA NOTES 1,820,000.00 1,820,273.00 1,809,134.60 1.00% 8/28/2019 1.00%3130AA2H0 GOV FHLB NOTES 20,000,000.00 19,976,400.00 19,834,400.00 1.13% 11/29/2019 1.17%89237KAD5 CCCSIG ABS TOYOTA CO 40,052.15 40,049.88 40,049.88 1.25% 3/16/2020 1.25%121101042 CCCCD CD BERTA KAMM 3,397.22 3,397.22 3,397.22 0.40% 5/24/2020 0.40%912828VF4 CCCCD GOV US TREASUR 1,790,000.00 1,814,053.13 1,768,949.60 1.38% 5/31/2020 1.00%3133834H1 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 1,865,000.00 1,879,174.00 1,841,426.40 1.38% 6/12/2020 1.18%3136G16D6 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 2,465,000.00 2,491,622.00 2,431,821.10 1.35% 6/26/2020 1.07%89237WAD9 CCCSIG ABS TOYOTA AU 71,571.45 71,569.54 71,569.54 1.14% 8/17/2020 1.14%3133EGUT0 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 4,690,000.00 4,700,880.80 4,607,878.10 1.17% 9/21/2020 1.11%912828Q78 CCCCD GOV US TREASUR 35,000.00 35,626.68 34,360.20 1.38% 4/30/2021 0.98%912828Q78 CCCCD GOV US TREASUR 25,000.00 25,349.18 24,543.00 1.38% 4/30/2021 0.97%Risk Assessment(Securities Greater Than or Less Than Two Standard Deviations) As of March 31, 2019 Exhibit VAVERAGE DAYSAVERAGE DAILY TO MATURITY AVERAGE DAYS TOBALANCE PERCENT OF AVERAGE AS A PERCENT MATURITY FOR (PAR)PORTFOLIOYTMOF PORTFOLIOTHE QUARTER A. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office1$2,966,477,213.04 83.38% 2.5290% 155.64 187B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors2 1. PFM $137,468,036.69 3.86% 2.0737% 22.83 591 2. Local Agency Investment Fund3$218,542,093.55 6.14% 2.3943% 0.06 1 3. Wells Capital Management $44,499,294.80 1.25% 2.6000% 2.95 236 4. CalTRUST Short Term Fund3$45,528,123.79 1.28% 2.5367% 0.01 1 5. CalTRUST Liquidity Fund4$80,598,647.14 2.27% 2.5133% 0.00 0C. Cash5$64,745,191.46 1.82% 0.9745% 0.00 0Total $3,557,858,600.47 100.00% * Weighted Average YTM of Portfolio = 2.48% 182 Notes:1. Excludes the funds managed by PFM.2. Excludes: Section B.6.a (EBRCS Bond) of the Investment Pool Summary and Futuris Public Entity Trust. 3. LAIF and CalTRUST Short Term Fund are subject to a one day call of principal provision4. CalTRUST Liquidity Fund provides a same day liquidity provision.5. The average of Investable Balances and the average of Earnings Allowance Rates of all three banks, WFB, BofA, Bank of the West, and Mechanics.CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL AVERAGE INFORMATIONJanuary 1, 2019 through March 31, 2019 Exhibit V (a)CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOLSUMMARY OF POOL RATES AND BENCHMARKSAS OF MARCH 31, 2019QuarterlyPool Rates:YTM as of Quarterly Average3/31/19 Ave. DTMTotal County Portfolio (w/ Cash) 2.45% 2.48% 197*1Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office 2.49% 2.53% 187PFM 1.89% 2.07% 591Wells Capital Management 2.74% 2.60% 236CalTRUST Short Term Fund 2.54% 2.54% 314*2CalTRUST Liquidity Fund 2.40% 2.51% 39*3Quarterly PMIA Ave.Apportionment Effective RateYieldLocal Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 2.55% 2.39% 179*21/1/19 - 3/31/19Benchmarks:3/31/19High Ave.LowFederal Fund Rates Index 2.4100% 2.4100% 2.4002% 2.4000%Six Month Treasury Bill 2.3425% 2.4250% 2.3914% 2.3425%Six Month LIBOR 2.6595% 2.8739% 2.7546% 2.6411%Vanguard Prime Money Mkt Fund 0.6100%*1. Cash is included in the calculation.*2. Average days to maturity with a one day call of principal provision.*3. Average days to maturity with a same day liquidity provision. Exhibit V (b)0.0000%0.5000%1.0000%1.5000%2.0000%2.5000%3.0000%Contra Costa County Investment PoolAverage Quarterly YTMas of March 31, 2019TreasurerPFMLAIFWells Capital MgmtCalTRUST STCalTRUST LIQ Exhibit VIMaturity CouponDescriptionCUSIPDateRateParMarket CostProvisionsFund #($) ($) ($)CORP CHEVRON 166764BH2 5/16/2019 1.56% 5,000,000.00 4,992,850.00 4,986,000.00 Make‐whole call +12.5 bps 8177CCCSIG CORP BERKSHIR 084664CK5 8/15/2019 1.30% 375,000.00 373,241.25 374,636.25 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCSIG CORP IBM CRED 44932HAA1 9/6/2019 1.63% 700,000.00 697,165.00 699,468.00 Make‐whole call +7 bps 6911CCCCD CORP PFIZER IN 717081DL4 5/15/20192.10% 1,960,000.00 1,958,902.40 1,984,068.80 Make‐whole call +7 bps 7944CCCSIG CORP HONEYWEL 438516BQ8 10/30/2019 1.80% 240,000.00 238,819.20 239,812.80 Make‐whole call +5 bps 6911CCCSIG CORP PFIZER 717081EB5 12/15/2019 1.70% 580,000.00 575,186.00 579,887.04 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918BV5 2/6/2020 1.85% 10,000,000.00 9,940,800.00 10,000,000.00 Make‐whole call +10 bps 8177CCCSIG CORP APPLE IN 037833CK4 2/7/2020 1.90% 600,000.00 597,198.00 599,706.00 Make‐whole call +7.5 bps 6911CCCSIG CORP CHEVRON 166764BP4 3/3/20201.99% 1,075,000.00 1,069,173.50 1,078,569.00 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCCD CORP AMERICAN 0258M0EE5 3/3/2020 2.20% 170,000.00 169,211.20 169,823.20 Call on and anytime after 2/1/20 7903CCCSIG CORP EXXON MO 30231GAG7 3/6/2020 1.91% 400,000.00 397,592.00 401,916.00 Make‐whole call +5 bps 6911CORP APPLE INC 037833CS7 5/11/2020 1.80% 10,000,000.00 9,922,200.00 9,991,300.00 Make‐whole call +10 bps 8177CCCSIG CORP APPLE IN 037833CS7 5/11/2020 1.80% 530,000.00 525,876.60 529,459.40 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCSIG CORP WALT DIS 25468PDU7 6/5/2020 1.80% 850,000.00 842,069.50 849,014.00 Make‐whole call +6 bps 6911CCCSIG CORP AMERI HO 02665WBT7 7/20/2020 1.95% 505,000.00 499,914.65 504,489.95 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCSIG CORP CATERPIL 14913Q2A6 9/4/2020 1.85% 635,000.00 627,868.95 634,466.60 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCSIG CORP VISA INC 92826CAB8 12/14/2020 2.20% 210,000.00 209,076.00 212,310.00 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCCD CORP GOLDMAN S 38141GWG5 12/27/2020 2.60% 225,000.00 223,762.50 227,045.25 Make‐whole call +20 bps 7903CCCSIG CORP BB&T MTN 05531FAZ6 2/1/2021 2.15% 215,000.00 212,981.15 214,901.10 Call on and anytime after 1/1/2021 6911CCCCD CORP BB T MTN 05531FAZ6 2/1/2021 2.15% 110,000.00 108,967.10 109,864.70 Call on and anytime after 1/1/2021 7903CCCSIG CORP UNITED P 911312BP0 4/1/2021 2.05% 475,000.00 470,801.00 474,249.50 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCCD CORP BANK OF N 06406FAA1 4/15/2021 2.50%125,000.00 124,696.25 126,846.25 Call on and anytime after 3/15/21 7903CCCSIG CORP PEPSICO 713448DX3 4/15/2021 2.00% 375,000.00 371,790.00 374,925.00 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCCD CORP PEPSICO I 713448DX3 4/15/2021 2.00% 70,000.00 69,400.80 69,986.00 Make‐whole call +10 bps 7903CCCSIG ABS CARMAX 20 14314RAH5 4/15/2021 1.80% 90,814.51 90,807.84 90,807.84 10% collateral call 6911CCCCD CORP BANK OF A 06051GFW4 4/19/2021 2.63%110,000.00 109,726.10 110,823.90 Make‐whole call +25 bps 7903CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918BP8 8/8/2021 1.55% 8,549,000.00 8,344,764.39 8,389,048.21 Make‐whole call +10 bps 8177CCCSIG CORP BOFA CAL 06051GGS2 10/1/2021 2.33% 545,000.00 539,931.50 545,000.00 Make‐whole call +15 bps 6911CCCSIG ABS JOHN DEER 47788BAD6 10/15/2021 1.82% 225,000.00 224,983.53 224,983.53 10% collateral call 6911CCCSIG ABS NAROT 201 65478GAD2 10/15/2021 1.75%500,000.00 499,972.05 499,972.05 5% collateral call 6911CCCCD CORP CITIGRP I 172967LC3 12/8/2021 2.90% 250,000.00 249,935.00 254,137.50 Make‐whole call +20 bps 7903CCCSIG ABS TAOT 2017 89238KAD4 1/18/2022 1.93%225,000.00 224,979.26 224,979.26 5% collateral call 6911GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134GBW81 11/22/2022 2.35% 10,000,000.00 9,951,900.00 10,000,000.00 Quarterly; First 2/22/18; Last 11/22/20 8177CCCSIG ABS CCCIT 201 17305EGK5 1/20/2023 2.49% 350,000.00 349,951.56 349,951.56 5% cleanup call 6911CCCCD ABS ALLYA 2018 02007MAE0 6/15/2022 2.35%110,000.00 109,987.28 109,987.28 10% collateral call 7903CCCSIG ABS ALLYA 201 02007MAE0 6/15/2022 2.35%265,000.00 264,969.37 264,969.37 10% collateral call 6911CCCCD ABS TAOT 2018 89238BAD4 5/16/2022 2.35%100,000.00 99,998.85 99,998.85 5% collateral call 8177CORP JOHNSON & JOHNS 478160CH5 11/10/2020 1.95% 16,850,000.00 16,722,277.00 16,695,991.00 Make‐whole call +7.5bps 8177CCCSIG BANK OF NY ME 06406HDD8 8/17/2020 2.60%500,000.00 499,945.00 497,545.00 Callable on and anytime after 7/17/20 6911CCCSIG JDOT 2018 COR 47788CAC6 4/18/2022 2.66%190,000.00 189,986.34 189,986.34 10% collateral call 6911CCCCD CORP CICSO SYS 17275RBD3 2/28/2021 2.20% 130,000.00 129,139.40 127,758.80 Make‐whole call +15bps 7903CCCSIG CORP UNILEVER 904764AZ0 3/22/2021 2.75% 650,000.00 652,294.50 646,678.50 Make‐whole call +10bps 6911CCCCD ABS ALLYA 2018 02007JAC1 1/17/2023 3.00%110,000.00 109,992.48 109,992.48 10% collateral call 7903CCCSIG CORP AMERICAN 025816BU2 5/17/2021 3.38% 785,000.00 795,063.70 784,866.55 Callable on and anytime after 4/17/21 6911CORP APPLE INC 037833BS8 2/23/2021 2.25% 20,000,000.00 19,928,000.00 19,679,400.00 Make‐whole call +15 bps 8801CCCSIG CORP BBT CORP 05531FBD4 9/3/2021 3.20% 150,000.00 151,657.50 149,821.50 Callable on and anytime after 8/3/21 6911CCCCD MBS FHMS K721 3137BM6P68/25/2022 3.09% 100,000.00 100,851.56 100,851.56 1% cleanup call 6911CCCSIG ABS FORDO 201 34528FAD0 11/15/2022 3.03% 225,000.00 224,963.62 224,963.62 10% collateral call 6911CCCSIG CORP GENERAL 369550BA5 5/11/2020 2.88% 460,000.00 461,522.60 458,371.60 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCSIG CORP HERSHEY 427866AY4 5/15/2020 2.90% 350,000.00 352,240.00 349,769.00 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCCD CORP HOME DEPO 437076AZ5 4/1/2023 2.70% 100,000.00 100,494.00 98,100.00 Make‐whole call +15 bps 7903CONTRA COSTA COUNTYTREASURER'S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOSTRUCTURED SECURITIESMarch 31, 2019 Exhibit VIMaturity CouponDescriptionCUSIPDateRateParMarket CostProvisionsFund #($) ($) ($)CORP CHEVRON 166764BH2 5/16/2019 1.56% 5,000,000.00 4,992,850.00 4,986,000.00 Make‐whole call +12.5 bps 8177CONTRA COSTA COUNTYTREASURER'S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOSTRUCTURED SECURITIESMarch 31, 2019CCCSIG ABS HART 2018 44891KAD7 7/15/2022 2.79%130,000.00 129,980.42 129,980.42 5% collateral call 6911CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918BA1 2/12/2022 2.38% 10,000,000.00 10,003,500.00 9,748,700.00 Make‐whole call +10 bps 8177MICROSOFT CORP 594918BG8 11/3/2020 2.00% 8,000,000.00 7,946,800.00 7,865,520.00 Make‐whole call +7.5 bps 8177CORP WALMART INC 931142DY6 10/9/2019 1.75% 15,000,000.00 14,926,050.00 14,835,345.00 Make‐whole call +5 bps 8177CORP WALMART INC 931142DY6 10/9/2019 1.75% 5,000,000.00 4,975,350.00 4,945,460.00 Make‐whole call +5 bps 8177CCCSIG CORP WALMART 931142EJ8 6/23/2021 3.13% 595,000.00 603,163.40 594,970.25 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCSIG ABS CARMX 201 14313FAD1 6/15/2023 3.13% 200,000.00 199,972.74 199,972.74 10% collateral call 6911CCCSIG ABS MBART 201 58772RAD6 1/17/2023 3.03%410,000.00 409,984.26 409,984.26 5% collateral call 6911CCCCD ABS NAROT 201 65479GAD1 3/15/2023 3.06% 65,000.00 64,997.89 64,997.89 5% collateral call 7903CCCCD ABS MBART 2018 58772RAD6 1/17/2023 3.03% 70,000.00 69,997.31 69,997.31 5% collateral call 7903CORP JOHNSON AND JOH 478160CD4 3/3/2022 2.25% 10,284,000.00 10,234,945.32 10,082,433.60 Make‐whole call +7.5 bps 8177CCCSIG CORP CATERPIL 14913Q2N8 9/7/2021 3.15% 100,000.00 101,152.00 99,923.00 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCSIG CORP UNILEVER 904764BF3 3/7/2022 3.00% 100,000.00 100,984.00 99,516.00 Make‐whole call +10 bps 6911CCCSIG CORP PFIZER I 717081EM1 9/15/2021 3.00% 250,000.00 254,015.00 249,662.50 Make‐whole call +5 bps 6911CORP JOHNSON AND JOH 478160CD4 3/3/2022 2.25% 10,000,000.00 9,952,300.00 9,796,500.00 Make‐whole call +7.5 bps 8177CCCSIG CORP 3M COMPA 88579YBA8 9/14/2021 3.00% 185,000.00 187,149.70 184,620.75 Make‐whole call +5 bps 6911CORP APPLE INC 037833BS8 2/23/2021 2.25% 10,000,000.00 9,964,000.00 9,830,320.00 Make‐whole call +15 bps 8177CCCSIG ABS FORDL 201 34531LAD2 12/15/2021 3.19% 240,000.00 239,979.72 239,979.72 5% deal call 6911CCCSIG ABS BMWLT 201 05586CAC8 7/20/2021 3.26% 150,000.00 149,979.15 149,979.15 5% deal call 6911CCCSIG ABS MBALT 201 58769LAC6 9/15/2021 3.21%500,000.00 499,988.80 499,988.80 5% deal call 6911CCCSIG CORP AMERICAN 02665WCP4 12/10/2021 3.38% 300,000.00 305,265.00 299,856.00 Make‐whole call 6911CCCSIG CORP HOME DEP 437076BV3 3/1/2022 3.25% 225,000.00 230,107.50 224,383.50 Make‐whole call +10bps 6911CCCSIG MBS FHMS KP05 3137FKK39 7/25/2023 3.20% 200,911.20 200,910.61 200,910.60 1% cleanup call 6911CORP APPLE INC 037833AR1 5/6/2021 2.85% 15,000,000.00 15,098,850.00 14,938,365.00 Make‐whole call +10bps 8177CORP EXXON MOBIL COR 30231GAV4 3/1/2021 2.22% 12,640,000.00 12,582,614.40 12,374,185.60 Make‐whole call +15bps 8177CORP ORACLE CORP 68389XAX3 10/8/2019 2.25% 20,000,000.00 19,957,400.00 19,922,910.00 Make‐whole call +10bps 8177CORP WALMART INC 931142DY6 10/9/2019 1.75% 20,000,000.00 19,901,400.00 19,810,100.00 Make‐whole call +5bps 8177CCCSIG ABS GMCAR 201 36256XAD4 11/16/2023 2.97% 225,000.00 224,975.09 224,975.09 10% collateral call 6911CCCSIG ABS MBALT 201 58772TAC4 11/15/2021 3.10%155,000.00 154,995.46 154,995.46 5% deal call 6911CORP WALMART INC 931142DY6 10/9/2019 1.75% 15,530,000.00 15,453,437.10 15,522,179.78 Make‐whole call +5bps 8177CCCCD CORP TOYOTA MO 89236TFS9 1/8/2024 3.35% 145,000.00 148,932.40 146,432.64 Make‐whole call +15bps 7903CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918BV5 2/6/2020 1.85% 15,074,000.00 14,984,761.92 14,968,783.48 Make‐whole call +10bps 8177CCCSIG ABS NAROT 201 65479KAD2 10/16/2023 2.90%550,000.00 549,916.68 549,916.68 5% collateral call 6911CCCSIG ABS ALLYA 201 02004WAC5 9/15/2023 2.91%325,000.00 324,960.74 324,960.74 10% collateral call 6911CCCSIG ABS GMALT 201 36256UAD0 12/20/2021 2.98% 225,000.00 224,964.68 224,964.68 10% collateral call 6911CCCSIG CORP 3M COMPA 88579YBF7 3/1/2022 2.75% 245,000.00 247,136.40 244,884.85 Make‐whole call +5bps 6911CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918BW3 2/6/2022 2.40% 15,000,000.00 14,978,550.00 14,896,450.00 Make‐whole call +10bps 8177CCCSIG ABS FORDL 201 34532FAD4 5/15/2020 2.90% 265,000.00 264,979.28 264,979.28 5% deal call 6911CCCCD ABS HARROT 201 43814WAC9 3/20/2023 2.83% 100,000.00 99,997.32 99,997.32 10% collateral call 7903CCCSIG CORP PFIZER I 717081ER0 3/11/2022 2.80% 170,000.00 171,473.90 169,989.80 Make‐whole call +5bps 6911CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918BN3 8/8/2019 1.10% 9,854,000.00 9,803,153.36 9,804,844.96 Make‐whole call +7.5bps 8177CCCSIG CORP MERCK AN 589331AT4 9/15/2022 2.40% 300,000.00 298,608.00 296,934.00 Make‐whole call +12.5bps 6911CCCSIG CORP GOLDMAN 38141GWC4 4/26/2022 3.00% 325,000.00 324,294.75 327,094.08 Make‐whole call +20bps 6911CCCSIG CORP JPMORGAN 46647PBB1 4/1/2023 3.21% 800,000.00 804,816.00 800,000.00 One time call: 4/1/22 6911CORP TOYOTA MOTOR CR 89236TCF0 3/12/2020 2.15% 20,000,000.00 19,911,000.00 19,945,465.56 Make‐whole call +10bps 8177316,277,725.71 314,961,667.78 313,547,910.63 6911 ‐ Contra Costa County School Insurance Group managed by PFM7903, 7943, 7944 ‐ Contra Costa Community College District managed by PFM8177 ‐ County Pool managed by the Treasurer's Office Exhibit VI (a)DESCRIPTIONCUSIPMATURITY DATEPARMARKETCOSTPROVISIONS($) ($) ($)AMXCA 171 A02587AAJ3 2/18/2020 500,000.00 497,387.19 492,539.06 5% collateral callAMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP 02665WCL3 2/21/2020 700,000.00 702,617.20 700,686.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +15bpsAPPLE INC 037833DH0 11/13/2019 500,000.00 501,859.50 494,665.00 Make-whole call +5bpsBACCT 171 A05522RCW6 3/16/2020 750,000.00 746,045.23 744,316.41 5% collateral callBB&T CORP 05531FAS2 1/15/2020 250,000.00 250,789.81 248,092.50 Callable on and anytime after 12/15/19BMWLT 171 A3 055657AC4 5/20/2020 252,920.36 252,669.84 251,359.36 5% deal callBMWLT 172 A2A 05584PAB3 2/20/2020 86,346.78 86,310.79 86,339.24 5% deal callBANK OF AMERICA CORP 06051GFE4 4/1/2019 740,000.00 746,708.57 741,376.40 Float quarterly: LIBOR +87bpsBANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP 06406HCU1 5/15/2019 250,000.00 251,911.78 250,047.50 Callable on and anytime after 4/15/19BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO 07330NAL9 5/10/2019 450,000.00 451,979.63 445,333.50 Callable on and anytime after 4/10/19BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 084670BL1 8/14/2019 700,000.00 700,441.47 696,311.00 Make-whole call +10bpsBLACKROCK INC 09247XAE1 12/10/2019 700,000.00 721,883.87 722,435.00 Make-whole call +25bpsCOMET 161 A14041NFC0 4/15/2019 600,000.00 600,915.83 603,398.44 Float monthly: LIBOR +45bps; 5% clean up callCOMET 163 A14041NFE6 6/17/2019 250,000.00 249,457.96 246,474.61 5% clean up callCATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP 14912L6R7 5/18/2019 700,000.00 702,279.55 690,984.00 Make-whole call +10bpsCHAIT 124 A161571FK5 8/15/2019 475,000.00 473,502.81 468,283.20 10% collateral callCHAIT 162 A161571HC1 6/17/2019 300,000.00 299,394.30 296,671.88 10% clean up callCHEVRON CORP 166764AR1 3/3/2020 200,000.00 198,984.64 197,310.00 Make-whole call +7.5bpsCCCIT 14A6 A6 17305EFS9 7/15/2019 400,000.00 401,255.56 397,562.50 5% collateral callCCCIT 16A1 A1 17305EFW0 11/19/2019 450,000.00 450,392.12 443,056.64 5% collateral callCITIBANK NA17325FAN8 5/1/2020 700,000.00 711,219.13 701,925.00 Make-whole call +10bpsFEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 3130ACLX0 10/30/2019 500,000.00 500,934.49 494,187.00 One time call on 10/30/18FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP3134G9Q75 7/26/2019 500,000.00 499,088.47 493,250.00 Quarterly; First 10/26/16, Last 4/26/19GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 369550BA5 5/11/2020 250,000.00 253,622.64 249,620.00 Make-whole call +10bpsHAROT 163 A3 438124AC3 5/18/2020 76,769.42 76,551.06 76,283.61 10% collateral callHAROT 183 A2 43815HAB3 12/21/2020 658,963.86 659,623.20 659,041.08 10% collateral callHONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC 438516BP0 10/30/2019 500,000.00 502,447.17 500,228.50 Float quarterly: LIBOR +4bpsINTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPM 45905UK60 7/19/2019 500,000.00 502,486.96 499,850.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR -12bpsJDOT 2018 A2 47788CAB8 10/15/2020 95,097.29 95,117.44 95,093.13 10% collateral callMASTERCARD INC 57636QAA2 4/1/2019 500,000.00 505,000.00 497,920.00 Make-whole call +10bpsNAROT 17B A3 65478GAD2 10/15/2021 450,000.00 446,775.70 442,212.89 5% collateral callPNC BANK NA 69353RFD5 5/19/2020 680,000.00 683,675.74 681,258.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +36bpsSAN FRANCISCO CALIF BAY AREA RAPID TRAN DIST SALES 797669XS2 7/1/2019 750,000.00 752,833.13 750,000.00 Make-whole call +5bpsSAN FRANCISCO CALIF CITY & CNTY ARPTS COMMN INTL A 79766DKL2 5/1/2019 750,000.00 754,905.63 750,000.00 Make-whole callTAOT 16C A3 89237WAD9 8/17/2020 110,109.92 109,737.81 109,645.39 5% collateral callUS BANK NA 90331HNK5 1/17/2020 700,000.00 704,412.03 700,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +12.5bpsVZOT 18A A1B 92348XAB1 4/20/2023 800,000.00 800,566.76 800,000.00 10% collateral call$17,775,207.63 $17,845,784.97 $17,717,756.85CONTRA COSTA COUNTYWELLS CAP MANAGEMENTSTRUCTURED SECURITIESMarch 31, 2019 Exhibit VI (b)DESCRIPTIONCUSIPMATURITY DATEPARMARKETPROVISIONS($) ($)ALLYA 2018-3 A2 02007JAB3 5/17/20214,042,474.37 4,042,729.05 10% collateral callAXP 0 05/17/21 025816BV0 5/17/20211,660,000.00 1,664,458.49 Float quarterly: LIBOR +52.5 bpsAMXCA 2014-1 A 02582JGN4 12/15/20215,395,000.00 5,397,220.58 Float monthly: LIBOR +37 bps; 5% clean up callHNDA 0 09/09/21 02665WBJ9 9/9/20216,500,000.00 6,530,141.15 Float quarterly: LIBOR +61 bpsHNDA 0 07/20/20 02665WBS9 7/20/20206,000,000.00 6,010,872.90 Float quarterly: LIBOR +27 bpsAMCAR 2017-3 A2A 03065HAB4 12/18/2020645,831.25 644,899.06 10% collateral callAMCAR 2016-4 A3 03065TAD4 7/8/20214,677,847.92 4,664,236.79 10% collateral callAMCAR 2018-1 A2A 03066HAB3 7/19/20214,109,491.45 4,108,363.81 10% collateral callBBT 0 01/15/20 05531FAT0 1/15/20202,459,000.00 2,469,733.07 Float quarterly: LIBOR +71.5 bps; Call on and after 12/15/19BNP FLOAT 04/18/19 05586FEE3 4/18/201910,000,000.00 10,000,200.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +15 bpsBAC 0 07/21/21 06051GGN3 7/21/202112,500,000.00 12,529,937.63 Float quarterly: LIBOR +66 bps; Call on 7/21/20 onlyBMO 0 04/13/21 06367T4X5 4/13/202110,000,000.00 10,028,416.80 Float quarterly: LIBOR +46 bpsBMO 0 06/15/20 06367TYM6 6/15/20204,000,000.00 4,011,396.24 Float quarterly: LIBOR +44 bpsBNS 0 04/20/21 064159LH7 4/20/20217,000,000.00 7,025,144.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +44 bpsBACR 0 01/11/21 06739FJK8 1/11/20215,000,000.00 4,967,210.65 Float quarterly: LIBOR +46 bps; call on and after 12/11/20BACR FLOAT 10/15/19 06742TKR6 10/15/201910,000,000.00 10,013,761.60 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +36bpsBACR 0 08/07/20 06744CFV8 8/7/20205,000,000.00 4,997,699.95 Float quarterly: LIBOR +65 bpsBACR 0 08/07/19 06744CFY2 8/7/20194,304,000.00 4,308,268.45 Float quarterly: LIBOR +55bpsBBT 0 05/01/19 07330NAM7 5/1/20198,000,000.00 8,003,995.04 Float quarterly: LIBOR +53 bps; Call on and after 4/10/19BBT 0 01/15/20 07330NAP0 1/15/20202,000,000.00 2,005,186.10 Float quarterly: LIBOR +45 bpsCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY 130179KN3 4/1/20192,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 Make‐whole call +25bpsCALIFORNIA ST 13063A7G3 10/1/20192,900,000.00 2,953,447.00 Make‐whole call +45bpsCARMX 2017-4 A2A 14314RAH5 4/15/20212,479,934.71 2,474,153.24 10% collateral callCARMX 2018-2 A2 14314XAB5 8/16/20214,727,191.25 4,726,438.21 10% collateral callCARMX 2019-1 A2B 14315NAJ9 7/15/20229,000,000.00 9,008,007.30 10% collateral callCAT 0 09/07/21 14913Q2P3 9/7/20212,225,000.00 2,221,849.40 Float quarterly: LIBOR +28bpsCHAIT 2016-A2 161571HC1 6/15/20214,916,000.00 4,903,081.24 10% collateral callCHAIT 2017-A1 A 161571HJ6 1/18/20226,000,000.00 6,008,149.80 Float monthly: LIBOR +30bps; 10% clean up callCHAIT 2018-A1 A1 161571HN7 4/17/20238,230,000.00 8,225,073.52 10% collateral callC 0 06/07/19 172967KT7 6/7/20192,000,000.00 2,003,050.08 Float quarterly: LIBOR +93bpsCCCIT 2016-A1 A1 17305EFW0 11/19/20217,425,000.00 7,383,826.15 5% collateral callCCCIT 2017-A3 A3 17305EGB5 4/7/20225,875,000.00 5,834,708.66 5% collateral callCCCIT 2018-A1 A1 17305EGK5 1/20/20235,400,000.00 5,392,189.98 5% clean up callC 0 10/20/20 17325FAK4 10/20/20209,500,000.00 9,494,846.73 Float quarterly: LIBOR +30bpsRABOBK FLOAT 04/05/19 21684B5J9 4/5/20198,000,000.00 8,000,189.92 Float quarterly: LIBOR +20bpsACAFP FLOAT 07/13/20 22532XKZ0 7/13/202012,000,000.00 12,033,111.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +47bpsCS FLOAT 01/15/20 22549LSK2 1/15/20206,000,000.00 6,012,420.00 Float O/N: SOFR +55bpsDE 0 01/08/21 24422ETY5 1/8/20211,355,000.00 1,351,314.68 Float quarterly: LIBOR +16bpsDE 0 01/07/20 24422EUF4 1/7/202010,000,000.00 10,010,620.20 Float quarterly: LIBOR +18bpsDE 0 07/10/20 24422EUN7 7/10/20205,500,000.00 5,521,064.73 Float quarterly: LIBOR +42bpsDCENT 2014-A4 A4 254683BK0 12/15/20216,815,000.00 6,806,422.64 5% collateral callDRIVE 2019-1 A2A 26208NAB0 9/15/20218,253,000.00 8,262,943.21 10% collateral callDRIVE 2019-2 A2A 26208RAB1 3/15/20227,850,000.00 7,853,757.80 10% collateral callDRIVE 2018-4 A2A 26209BAB5 10/15/20202,721,579.98 2,721,515.48 10% collateral callDD 0 05/01/20 263534CM9 5/1/20205,800,000.00 5,816,448.39 Float quarterly: LIBOR +53 bpsCONTRA COSTA COUNTYCALTRUST SHORT TERM FUNDSTRUCTURED SECURITIESMarch 31, 2019 Exhibit VI (b)DESCRIPTIONCUSIPMATURITY DATEPARMARKETPROVISIONS($) ($)CONTRA COSTA COUNTYCALTRUST SHORT TERM FUNDSTRUCTURED SECURITIESMarch 31, 2019FORDO 2018-A A2A 34528FAB4 2/15/20214,554,017.51 4,552,750.13 10% collateral callFORDF 2015-2 A1 34528QDW1 1/15/20222,719,000.00 2,701,647.07 Cleanup callFORDO 2016-B A4 34532EAE5 8/15/20217,691,000.00 7,628,566.00 10% collateral callFORDL 2019-A A2A MTGE 34532FAB8 9/15/20218,000,000.00 8,006,612.00 5% deal callFORDO 2019-A A3 34533FAD3 9/15/20236,075,000.00 6,103,095.05 10% collateral callGD 2 7/8 05/11/20 369550BA5 5/11/202010,385,000.00 10,419,374.35 Make‐whole call +10 bpsGD 0 05/11/21 369550BF4 5/11/20212,750,000.00 2,761,672.24 Float quarterly: LIBOR +38 bpsGILD 2.55 09/01/20 375558BB8 9/1/202016,000,000.00 15,978,920.48 Make‐whole call +15 bpsGS 0 04/25/19 38141GVV3 4/25/201911,293,000.00 11,300,646.72 Float quarterly: LIBOR +104 bpsHAROT 2017-2 A3 43811BAC8 8/16/20212,508,849.98 2,491,330.68 10% collateral callHAROT 2016-3 A4 438124AD1 11/18/20227,955,000.00 7,886,061.97 10% collateral callHAROT 2017-3 A3 43814PAC4 9/20/20212,152,000.00 2,137,961.64 10% collateral callHAROT 2018-2 A2 43814UAF6 12/18/20207,617,650.56 7,619,123.05 10% collateral callIBM 0 01/20/21 44932HAE3 1/20/20213,000,000.00 3,000,937.26 Float quarterly: LIBOR +26 bpsIBRD FLOAT 08/21/20 459058GK3 8/21/202011,000,000.00 10,998,350.00 Float daily: SOFR +22 bpsJPM 0 03/09/21 46647PAC0 3/9/20215,000,000.00 5,004,757.45 Float quarterly: LIBOR +55 bpsJPM 0 06/18/22 46647PAT3 6/18/20222,290,000.00 2,287,368.38 Float quarterly: LIBOR +61 bpsJOHN DEERE OWNER TRUST 47788BAB0 4/15/2020283,253.56 283,104.20 10% collateral callLLOYDS FLOAT 07/15/20 53947BB25 7/15/20208,000,000.00 7,993,760.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +47bpsMTB 2 1/4 07/25/19 55279HAG5 7/25/2019550,000.00 549,307.00 Call on and anytime after 6/25/19MUFG FLOAT 10/24/19 55379WXW1 10/24/20195,000,000.00 5,002,756.05 Float quarterly: LIBOR +10bpsMUFG FLOAT 01/25/21 55379WYA8 1/25/20215,000,000.00 5,008,767.50 Float quarterly: LIBOR +50bpsMUFG 0 07/26/21 606822AX2 7/26/20213,000,000.00 3,005,273.70 Float quarterly: LIBOR +65 bpsMS 0 01/27/20 61747YDX0 1/27/20205,095,000.00 5,127,984.72 Float quarterly: LIBOR +114 bpsNMOTR 2017-A A 65474VAM3 4/15/20214,370,000.00 4,370,284.05 Float monthly: LIBOR +31 bps; 10% clean up callNMOTR 2017-B A 65474VAN1 4/18/202210,260,000.00 10,276,250.81 Float monthly: LIBOR +43 bps; 10% clean up callNMOTR 2017-C A 65474VAP6 10/17/20229,210,000.00 9,214,600.40 Float monthly: LiBOR +32 bps; 10% clean up callNMOTR 2019-A A 65474VAQ4 2/15/20243,070,000.00 3,079,474.02 10% deal callNAROT 2015-B A4 65475WAE8 1/17/20223,438,564.83 3,426,009.25 5% deal callNAROT 2015-C A4 65478AAE3 2/15/20224,742,000.00 4,716,205.42 5% deal callNAROT 2018-A A2A 65478DAB3 12/15/20203,826,801.38 3,822,678.38 5% collateral callNAROT 2017-B A3 65478GAD2 10/15/20213,965,000.00 3,933,506.40 5% collateral callNAROT 2016-B A3 65478VAD9 1/15/20211,545,186.90 1,537,635.57 5% collateral callNDASS FLOAT 04/05/19 65590AUR5 4/5/20198,000,000.00 8,000,189.92 Float quarterly: LIBOR +20 bpsPNC 0 05/19/20 69353RFD5 5/19/20202,025,000.00 2,028,927.87 Float quarterly: LIBOR +36 bpsPNC 0 01/22/21 69353RFK9 1/22/20215,280,000.00 5,274,877.45 Float quarterly: LIBOR +25 bpsPCAR 0 05/10/21 69371RP34 5/10/20214,135,000.00 4,136,968.80 Float quarterly: LIBOR +26 bpsSANUK 0 11/03/20 80283LAQ6 11/3/20208,340,000.00 8,329,247.91 Float quarterly: LIBOR +30bpsSDART 2017-3 A3 80284YAD6 6/15/20213,027,228.31 3,025,150.12 10% collateral callSDART 2018-2 A2A MTGE 80285FAB0 10/15/20202,240,835.19 2,240,509.60 10% collateral callSDART 2018-3 A2A 80285GAB8 3/15/20213,340,744.26 3,339,910.41 10% collateral callSDART 2019-1 A2A 80285HAB6 1/18/20225,210,000.00 5,212,279.90 10% collateral call Exhibit VI (b)DESCRIPTIONCUSIPMATURITY DATEPARMARKETPROVISIONS($) ($)CONTRA COSTA COUNTYCALTRUST SHORT TERM FUNDSTRUCTURED SECURITIESMarch 31, 2019STANLN FLOAT 04/24/19 85325TS71 4/24/201911,000,000.00 11,001,382.92 Float quarterly: LIBOR +23 bpsSUMIBK FLOAT 05/15/19 86563YWP4 5/15/20193,000,000.00 3,001,606.92 Float quarterly: LIBOR +46 bpsSUMITR FLOAT 08/16/19 86564FGY3 8/16/20197,000,000.00 7,003,842.93 Float quarterly: LIBOR +20 bpsSUMITR FLOAT 04/05/19 86564FKJ1 4/5/20198,500,000.00 8,500,131.41 Float quarterly: LIBOR +10 bpsSHBASS FLOAT 12/19/19 86958J2S7 12/19/201910,000,000.00 10,012,702.40 Float quarterly: LIBOR +21 bpsSHBASS 0 09/08/20 86960BAS1 9/8/20202,310,000.00 2,311,609.63 Float quarterly: LIBOR +36 bpsTAOT 2016-A A3 89237KAD5 3/16/2020200,651.50 200,437.51 5% collateral callTAOT 2017-D A3 89238KAD4 1/18/202210,905,000.00 10,826,142.67 5% collateral callTAOT 2018-B A2B 89238TAC7 3/15/202110,758,186.84 10,759,929.67 5% collateral callUBS 0 08/14/19 90261XHF2 8/14/201915,000,000.00 15,033,531.75 Float quarterly: LIBOR +64 bpsUSB 0 01/17/20 90331HNK5 1/17/20205,000,000.00 5,001,726.55 Float quarterly: LIBOR +12.5 bpsUSB 3.05 07/24/20 90331HNU3 7/24/202010,000,000.00 10,060,812.40 Callable on and anytime after 6/24/20UPS 0 04/01/21 911312BH8 4/1/20218,415,000.00 8,399,890.62 Float quarterly: LIBOR +15bpsUNH 2.7 07/15/20 91324PCM2 7/15/20207,394,000.00 7,409,285.25 Make‐whole call +15 bpsUNH 0 10/15/20 91324PDB5 10/15/20204,790,000.00 4,786,555.13 Float quarterly: LIBOR +7 bpsWMT 0 06/23/21 931142EH2 6/23/20211,330,000.00 1,334,768.05 Float quarterly: LIBOR +23 bpsWFC 0 07/22/20 94974BGN4 7/22/20201,150,000.00 1,159,164.29 Float quarterly: LIBOR +88 bpsWFC FLOAT 04/05/19 94989RD70 4/5/20198,000,000.00 8,000,223.36 Float quarterly: LIBOR +25 bpsWFC FLOAT 04/23/19 94989RF94 4/23/20197,800,000.00 7,801,210.25 Float quarterly: LIBOR +21 bpsWFC FLOAT 04/15/19 94989RY69 4/15/201910,000,000.00 10,000,674.90 Float quarterly: LIBOR +10 bps626,764,321.75 626,862,963.25 Contra Costa County invests approximately $44.5 million in the CalTRUST Short Term Fund which had assets of $1.27 billion as of 3/31/19. The above data represents the information at the Short Term Fund level, not at the Contra Costa County account level. Exhibit VI (c)DESCRIPTIONCUSIPMATURITY DATEPARMARKETPROVISIONS($) ($)HNDA 0 06/24/19 02665WCK5 6/24/2019910,000.00 910,000.00 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +5bpsBNP FLOAT 04/04/19 05586FDA2 4/4/20192,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +8bpsBMO FLOAT 07/11/19 06371EEP8 7/11/20192,500,000.00 2,502,209.86 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +33bpsBANK OF MONTREAL CHICAGO 06370RQX0 12/10/20192,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 Float Monthly: LIBOR +40bpsBMO FLOAT 01/17/20 06370RRR2 1/17/20201,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 Float Monthly: LIBOR +42bpsBANK MONTREAL CHC CD FLT 06371EYK7 6/13/2019300,000.00 299,994.19 Float Monthly: LIBOR +30bpsBNS FLOAT 05/16/19 06417G3B2 5/16/20192,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 Float O/N: SOFR +43bpsBNS FLOAT 09/20/19 06417G3C0 9/20/20193,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +20bpsBEDFDG 0 08/02/19 07644DGY8 8/2/20192,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 Float Monthly: LIBOR +34bpsBEDFDG 0 06/19/19 07646KDN7 6/19/20192,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +14bpsCM FLOAT 07/25/19 13606BH58 7/25/2019600,000.00 600,000.00 Float Monthly: LIBOR +30bpsCM FLOAT 07/16/19 13606BZL3 7/16/2019800,000.00 800,000.00 Float Monthly: LIBOR +31bpsCICFP FLOAT 05/08/19 22536UTL4 5/8/20192,500,000.00 2,500,000.00 Float Monthly: LIBOR +27bpsCPSERA 2.92 05/06/19 22845AGD6 5/6/20192,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 Callable from 4/1/19‐5/2/19INGFDL 0 12/02/19 CP 44988GAB4 12/2/20194,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 Float Monthly: LIBOR +18bpsING (US) FUNDING LLC 44988KGN3 5/21/20193,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 Float Monthly: LIBOR +31bpsING (US) FUNDING LLC 44988KFW4 4/12/2019500,000.00 500,000.00 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +10bpsMUFG FLOAT 02/24/20 55379WZM1 2/24/20201,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +18bpsMUFG FLOAT 06/04/19 60683BNF6 6/4/20192,600,000.00 2,600,000.00 Float Monthly: LIBOR +32bpsMIZUHO BANK LTD NY BRA CD 60700A7C2 7/30/20194,000,000.00 4,000,000.00 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +1bpsMIZUHO FLOAT 04/18/19 60700AY99 4/18/20196,000,000.00 5,999,822.19 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +15bpsOCBCSP FLOAT 11/07/19 69033MFL6 11/7/20195,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 Float Quarterly: LIBOR FlatRY FLOAT 08/16/19 78012UFB6 8/16/2019700,000.00 700,000.00 Float Monthly: LIBOR +31bpsSKANDINAVISKA ENSKILDA 83050FS77 5/3/2019800,000.00 799,995.22 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +8bpsSOCGEN FLOAT 06/12/19 83369YX76 6/12/20192,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +20bpsSUMIBK FLOAT 05/15/19 86563YWP4 5/15/20193,400,000.00 3,401,219.36 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +46bpsSUMITR FLOAT 04/05/19 86564FKJ1 4/5/20191,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +10bpsSUMIBK FLOAT 04/18/19 86565BPF2 4/18/20191,000,000.00 999,998.73 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +15bpsSHBASS FLOAT 12/19/19 86958J2S7 12/19/20193,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +21bpsSHBASS FLOAT 10/21/19 86958JC98 10/21/20192,000,000.00 2,001,520.33 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +27bpsSVENSKA HANDELSBANKEN 86958JF20 5/7/2019501,000.00 501,008.57 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +10bpsSVENSKA HANDELSBANKEN CD 86958JPR4 6/7/20191,100,000.00 1,100,204.18 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +28bpsSWEDBANK (NEW YORK) 87019VTQ0 5/21/20191,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 Float Monthly: LIBOR +26bpsTORONTO DOMINION BANK NY 89114MLL9 6/9/20192,200,000.00 2,200,000.00 Float Monthly: LIBOR +30bpsUBS 0 08/14/19 90261XHF2 8/14/20195,700,000.00 5,714,593.46 Float Quarterly: LIBOR +64bps76,811,000.00 76,830,566.09 Contra Costa County invests approximately $95.0 million in the CalTRUST Liquidity Fund which had assets of $346.5 million as of 3/31/19. The above data represents the information at the Liquidity Fund level, not at the Contra Costa County account level.CONTRA COSTA COUNTYCALTRUST LIQUIDITY FUNDSTRUCTURED SECURITIESMarch 31, 2019 Pooled Money Investment AccountPAR VALUES MATURING BY DATE AND TYPEMaturities in Millions of Dollars1 day 31 days 61 days 91 days 121 days151 days 181 days 211 days 271 days 1 year 2 years 3 years4 yearsto tototototototototototo toITEM30 days 60 days 90 days 120 days 150 days 180 days 210 days 270 days 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years5 year/outTREASURY1,750$ 3,250$ 4,700$ 3,350$ 5,750$ 2,300$ 2,150$ 3,800$ 5,750$ 11,300$ 200$ REPOTDs1,449$ 1,192$ 1,184$ 429$ 317$ 143$ AGENCY3,335$ 4,750$ 2,050$ 2,600$ 235$ 2,050$ 400$ 477$ 150$ 2,408$ 723$ CP1,900$ 1,550$ 1,150$ 350$ 50$ 300$ 150$ CDs + BNs4,750$ 2,400$ 1,725$ 1,450$ 350$ 1,150$ 1,550$ 600$ 100$ CORP BNDTOTAL87,716$ 13,184$ 13,142$ 10,809$ 8,179$ 6,702$ 5,943$ 4,250$ 4,877$ 6,000$ 13,708$ 923$ -$ -$ PERCENT 15.0% 15.0% 12.3% 9.3% 7.6% 6.8% 4.8% 5.6% 6.8% 15.6% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0%Notes: 1. SBA Floating Rate Securities are represented at coupon change date.2. Mortgages are represented at current book value.3. Figures are rounded to the nearest million.4. Does not include AB55 and General Fund loans.Portfolio as of 03-31-19Exhibit VII State of California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xhibit VII (a) State of California All investments are in U.S. Dollar according to the State of California. Pooled Money Investment Account DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Portfolio Holdings: Structured Notes and Asset-Backed Securities The Treasury Investment Division has received a number of inquiries concerning our various portfolio holdings. Questions involving structured notes, derivative products*, and asset-backed securities are the most notable. In an effort to clarify the information provided in our monthly statements, we would like to share with you our investment positions in structured notes and asset-backed securities. Following are the State of California Treasurer’s holdings in each category as of March 31, 2019: * The Pooled Money Investment Account Portfolio has not invested in, nor will it invest in, Derivative Products as defined in FASB 133. Exhibit VII (b) State of California Page 1 1. Structured Notes Structured notes are debt securities (other than asset-backed securities) whose cash flow characteristics (coupon rate, redemption amount, or stated maturity) depend upon one or more indices and/or that have embedded forwards or options. They are issued by corporations and by government-sponsored enterprises such as the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Bank System or an international agency such as the World Bank. Securities Accountability Structured Notes a.Callable Agency $ 100.000 million b.LIBOR Agency Floater $ 150.000 million c. 3 month LIBOR Corporate Floater $ 0.000 million d.3 month LIBOR Bank Floater $ 575.000 million e.2 year CMT Corporate Floater $ 0.000 million f. 3 month T-Bill Agency Floater $ 0.000 million g.3 month T-Bill Corporate Floater $ 0.000 million U.S. $825.000 million As of: 03/31/19 2.Asset-Backed Securities Asset-backed securities entitle the purchaser to receive a share of the cash flows from a pool of assets such as principal and interest repayments from a pool of mortgages (such as CMOs), small business loans, or credit card receivables (such as ABCP). Asset-Backed Securities a.Small Business Administration Pools $ 685.086 million b.Agency MBS-REMIC’S $ 23.501 million (Medium term sub-total) $ 708.587 million c. Commercial Paper (Short term sub-total)$ 495.673 million U.S. $1,204.260 million As of: 03/31/19 Exhibit VII (b) State of California Page 2 Total Portfolio As of: 03/31/19 $86,862,149,354.12 Structured notes and Medium-term Asset-backed securities as a percent of portfolio: 1.77% Short-term Asset-Backed Commercial Paper (ABCP) as a percent of portfolio: 0.57% * Total Medium-term and Short-term Structured notes and Asset-backed securities as a percent of portfolio: 2.34% *ABCP purchased by the Pooled Money Investment Account (PMIA) does not include Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) nor do any of the approved ABCP programs include SIVs as underlying assets. Exhibit VII (b) State of California Page 3 Exhibit VIIIPar Value 3,126,042,397.22 Book Price 99.434Book Value 3,108,334,180.03 Average Days to Maturity 178Market Value 3,116,881,284.16 Coupon 2.3996%Market Price 99.707 YTM 2.4951%Yield Change Market Value Market Price Gain/Loss2(bps) ($) ($) (bps)‐50 3,124,365,249.13 99.946 51.49‐25 3,120,614,231.95 99.826 39.42‐10 3,118,372,303.71 99.755 32.280 3,116,881,284.18 99.707 27.4510 3,115,393,133.95 99.659 22.6325 3,113,166,269.59 99.588 15.4950 3,109,469,053.26 99.470 3.62Note: Stress Testing is a form of testing that is used to determine the stability of a given system or entity. It reveals how well a portfolio is positionedin the event the forecasts prove true. The stress test conducted on the portfolio managed by the Treasurer's Office identifies the sensitivity of our portfolio to the change in interest rate. The test result shows if the yield were to go down by 50 bps, the market value of the portfolio wouldincrease by 51.49 bps. If the yield were to go up by 50 bps, the market value of the portfolio would increase by 3.62 bps.1. The stress test is conducted on the portfolio managed by the Treasurer's Office. Portfolios managed by external investment managers are excluded. All data is provided by FIS.2. Gain/Loss is calcuated based on the book value/price.Portfolio Stress Test1as of March 31, 2019 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Treasurer's Investment Policy for the Fiscal Year 2019-2020 as revised and adopted on May 21, 2019 by the Treasury Oversight Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Government Code Section 27133, at the May 21, 2019 Treasury Oversight Committee meeting, the Committee approved and recommended the acceptance of the attached revised policy. The policy incorporates greater detail of cash management and investment guidelines of surplus funds delegated for investing and reinvesting by the County Treasurer. A copy of the Treasurer's Investment Policy dated June 2019 is submitted to the Board of Supervisors for review and acceptance. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ronda Boler, (925) 957-2806 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C.169 To:Board of Supervisors From:Russell Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:TREASURER'S INVESTMENT POLICY FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 ATTACHMENTS CCC Investment Policy FY19-20 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 1 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TREASURER’S ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FISCAL YEAR 2019-2020 APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN JUNE 2019 The Contra Costa County Treasurer will annually present to both the Board of Supervisors (Board) and the Treasury Oversight Committee (Committee) a statement of investment policy, which the Board shall review and approve at a public meeting. Any changes in the policy shall also be reviewed and approved by the Board at a public meeting (Gov’t Code §53646(a)(1)). OFFICE OF COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 625 COURTS STREET, ROOM 100 MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 2 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 3 Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.0 SCOPE .................................................................................................................................................. 5 3.0 PARTICIPANTS ..................................................................................................................................... 5 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION .............................................................................................................................. 5 5.0 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................................... 5 6.0 GENERAL STRATEGY ........................................................................................................................... 6 7.0 STANDARD OF CARE ........................................................................................................................... 7 8.0 SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY ............................................................................................................. 8 9.0 AUTHORIZED BROKERS/DEALERS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ................................................... 9 10.0 SUITABLE AND AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS ................................................................................... 10 11.0 RESTRICTIONS AND PROHIBITIONS ................................................................................................. 15 12.0 INVESTMENT PARAMETERS ............................................................................................................. 16 13.0 EXTERNALLY MANAGED INVESTMENT POOLS, MUTUAL FUNDS AND SEPARATE ACCOUNTS ...... 18 14.0 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY ............................................................................................. 18 15.0 REPORTING ....................................................................................................................................... 19 16.0 COMPENSATION ............................................................................................................................... 20 17.0 CALCULATING AND APPORTIONING POOL EARNINGS .................................................................... 20 18.0 DEPOSITS AND WITHDRAWALS IN THE TREASURY ......................................................................... 20 19.0 TEMPORARY BORROWING OF POOL FUNDS ................................................................................... 22 20.0 INVESTMENT OF BOND PROCEEDS .................................................................................................. 22 21.0 DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN .............................................................................................................. 22 22.0 POLICY CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................................ 22 AUTHORIZATION FOR LAIF INVESTMENTS .................................................................................................. 24 APPROVED BROKERS ................................................................................................................................... 25 APPROVED ISSUERS .................................................................................................................................... 26 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 4 APPROVED PRIMARY DEALERS ................................................................................................................... 27 CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE ..................................................................................................................... 28 GLOSSARY OF TERMS .................................................................................................................................. 30 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 5 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TREASURER’S ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this Investment Policy (Policy) is to establish cash management and investment guidelines of surplus funds entrusted to the care of the Contra Costa County Treasurer’s Office (Treasurer’s Office) in accordance with applicable sections of California Government Code. All portfolio activities will be judged by the standards of the Policy and its ranking of investment objectives. 2.0 SCOPE This Policy applies to all and only funds over which the Treasurer’s Office has been granted fiduciary responsibility and direct control for their management. The funds covered by this Policy are accounted for and incorporated in the Contra Costa County Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and include but not limited to: Government Funds (e.g. general fund, special revenue funds, debt service funds, capital project funds, and permanent fund), Proprietary Funds (e.g. enterprise funds and internal service funds), and various Trust Funds. 3.0 PARTICIPANTS This Policy restricts deposits to those agencies mandated by California Government Code as treasury deposits. However, subject to the consent of the Treasurer’s Office and in accordance with section 53684, exemptions may be granted to non-mandatory depositing agencies, if it is determined that the additional deposit provides a benefit to the investment pool as a whole while not creating unmanageable liquidity risk. 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION In order to provide direction to those responsible for management of surplus funds, the County Treasurer has established this Policy and presented it to the Treasury Oversight Committee and the Board of Supervisors, and has made it available to the legislative body of local agencies that participates in the County Treasurer’s investment program. The Policy explains investable funds; authorized instruments; credit quality required; maximum maturities and concentrations; collateral requirements; qualifications of broker-dealers and financial institutions doing business with, or on behalf of, the County; limits on gifts and honoraria; the reporting requirements; the Treasury Oversight Committee; the manner of apportioning interest earnings and appropriating investment costs; and the criteria to request withdrawal of funds. 5.0 OBJECTIVES Gov’t Code §53600.5: When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling or managing public funds, the primary objective of a trustee shall be to safeguard the principal of the funds under its control. The secondary objective shall be to meet the liquidity needs of the depositor. The third objective shall be to achieve a return on the funds under its controls. 5.1 Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program. Investments shall be undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio. The objective will be to mitigate credit risk and market risk. 5.1.a Credit Risk CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 6 The Treasurer will minimize credit risk, the risk of loss due to the failure of the security issuer or backer, by: 1. Limiting investments to the safest type of securities 2. Pre-qualifying the financial institutions, broker/dealers, intermediaries, and advisers with which the Treasurer’s Office will do business 3. Diversifying the investment portfolio so that potential losses on individual securities will be minimized. 5.1.b Market Risk The Treasurer’s Office will minimize the risk that the market value of securities in the portfolio will fall due to changes in general interest rates, by: 1. Structuring the investment portfolio so that securities mature to meet cash requirements for ongoing operations, thereby avoiding the need to sell securities on the open market prior to maturity 2. Investing operating funds primarily in shorter-term securities, money market mutual funds, or similar investment pools. 5.2 Liquidity: The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating requirements that may be reasonably anticipated. This is accomplished by structuring the portfolio so that securities mature concurrent with cash needs to meet anticipated demands. Furthermore, since all possible cash demands cannot be anticipated, the portfolio should consist largely of securities with active secondary or resale markets. A portion of the portfolio also may be placed in money market mutual funds or local government investment pools which offer same- day liquidity for short-term funds. 5.3 Yield: The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk constraints and liquidity needs. Return on investment is of secondary importance compared to the safety and liquidity objectives described above. The core of investments is limited to relatively low risk securities in anticipation of earning a fair return relative to the risk being assumed. Securities may be sold prior to maturity when deemed prudent and necessary. Reasons of selling include but are not limited to: 1. A security with declining credit may be sold early to minimize loss of principal . 2. A security swap would improve the quality, yield, or target duration in the portfolio. 3. Liquidity needs of the portfolio require that the security be sold. 4. Portfolio rebalancing would bring the portfolio back into compliance. Investments will be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived. 5.4 Public Trust: All investments will be in conformance with state law and county ordinances and policies. The investment of public funds is a task that must maintain the public trust. 6.0 GENERAL STRATEGY 6.1 Buy and Hold: The Treasurer will generally use the passive investment strategy known as BUY AND HOLD whereas securities are purchased with the intent of holding them to maturity. Interest income and the reinvestment of interest income usually are the only sources of return in the portfolio. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 7 The investment program will focus on purchasing securities that will limit or reduce the potential default risk and ensure the reliability of cash flows from interest income. Generally, purchases will be laddered throughout the portfolio in order to minimize the number and cost of investment transactions. 6.2 Directed Investment: Local agencies may direct the investment, exchange, liquidation and reinvestment of their assets, but must meet the provisions of the investment objectives of this policy. The withdrawal of funds in the Treasury shall coincide with investment maturities or authorized sales of securities by the local agency’s legislative or governing body. 7.0 STANDARD OF CARE The following policies are designed in accordance with Government Code to provide transparency to the investment program while enhancing portfolio controls: 7.1 Prudent Investor Standard The standard of prudence to be used by the designated representative shall be subject to the “prudent investor” standard and shall be applied in the context of managing the overall portfolio. “Governing bodies of local agencies or persons authorized to make investment decisions on behalf of those local agencies investing public funds are trustees and therefore fiduciaries subject to the prudent investor standard. When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care, skill, prudence and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of the agency. Within the limitations of this section and considering individual investments as part to an overall strategy, investments may be acquired as authorized by law.” (Gov’t Code §53600.3.) For the investment of county funds in a county treasury, Government Code Section 27000.3 establishes the board of supervisors as a fiduciary that is subject to the prudent investor standard unless it delegates its investment duties to the county treasurer. For local agency funds invested in the county treasury pool, the county treasurer serves as a fiduciary and is subject to the prudent investor standard. 7.2 Ethics and Conflicts of Interest Investment officials shall refrain from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution and management of the Policy and investment program, or which could impair their ability to make impartial decisions. Please refer to the Contra Costa County Treasurer-Tax Collector’s Conflict of Interest Code for further explanation of the prohibited activities, and their enforcements and exceptions. 7.3 Limits on Honoraria, Gifts, and Gratuities In accordance with California Government Code Section 27133(d), this Policy establishes limits for the Director of Finance; individuals responsible for management of the portfolios; and members of the Investment Group and Review Group who direct individual investment decisions, select individual investment advisors and broker/dealers, and conduct day-to-day investment trading activity. The limits also apply to members of the Oversight Committee. Any individual who receives an aggregate total of gifts, honoraria and gratuities in excess of $50 in a calendar year from a broker/dealer, bank or service provider to the Pooled Investment Fund must report the gifts, dates and firms to the designated filing official and complete the appropriate State forms. No individual may receive aggregate gifts, honoraria, and gratuities in a calendar year in excess of the amount specified in Section 18940.2(a) of Title 2, Division 6 of the California Code of CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 8 Regulations. This limitation is $500 for the period January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020. Any violation must be reported to the State Fair Political Practices Commission. 7.4 Delegation of Authority 7.4.a Subject to Section 53607, the board of supervisors may, by ordinance, delegate to the county treasurer the authority to invest or reinvest the funds of the county and the funds of other depositors in the county treasury, pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 53600) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5. The county treasurer shall thereafter assume full responsibility for those transactions until the board of supervisors either revokes its delegation of authority, by ordinance, or decides not to renew the annual delegation, as provided in Section 53607 (Gov’t Code §27000.1). For local agency funds invested in the county treasury pool, the county treasurer serves as a fiduciary and is subject to the prudent investor standard. 7.4.b Responsibility for the operation of the investment program is hereby delegated to the County Treasurer, who shall act in accordance with established written procedures and internal controls for the operation of the investment program consistent with this investment policy. Procedures include references to: safekeeping, delivery vs. payment, investment accounting, repurchase agreements, wire transfer agreements, and collateral/depository agreements. No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided under the terms of this policy and the procedures established by the County Treasurer. 7.5 Treasury Oversight Committee In compliance with a Board Order of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, the County Contra Costa County Treasury Oversight Committee was established in November 6 of 1995. The intent of the Committee is to allow local agencies, including school districts, as well as the public, to participate in reviewing the policies that guide the investment of public funds. The mandate for the existence of the Committee was suspended in 2004 by the State of California; however, the Committee serves an important function and the Treasurer’s Office has elected to continue the program. 7.5.a The Committee shall annually review and monitor the County’s Investment Policy. 7.5.b The Committee shall cause an annual audit to determine the County Treasurer’s compliance with the Investment Policy and all investment funds in the county Treasury. 8.0 SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY 8.1 Delivery vs. Payment: All trades of marketable securities will be executed (cleared and settled) on a delivery vs. payment (DVP) basis to ensure that securities are deposited in the County Treasurer’s safekeeping institution prior to the release of funds. 8.2 Third-party Safekeeping: Securities will be held by an independent third-party safekeeping institution selected by the County Treasurer. All securities will be evidenced by safekeeping receipts in the County’s name or in a name designated by the County Treasurer. The safekeeping institution shall annually provide a copy of its most recent report on internal controls - Service Organization Control Reports (formerly 70, or SAS 70) prepared in accordance with the Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No. 16 (effective June 15, 2011.) 8.2.a A local agency purchasing or obtaining any securities prescribed in this section, in a negotiable, bearer, registered or non-registered format, shall require delivery of the securities to the local agency, including those purchased for the agency by financial CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 9 advisors, consultants or managers using the agency’s funds, by book entry, physical delivery or by third-party custodial agreement. The transfer of securities to the counterparty bank’s customer book-entry account may be used for book-entry delivery. For purposes of this section, “counterparty” means the other party to the transaction. A counterparty bank’s trust department or separate safekeeping department may be used for the physical delivery of the security if the security is held in the name of the local agency. Where this section specifies a percentage limitation for a particular category of investment, that percentage is applicable only at the date of purchase. Where this section does not specify a limitation on the term of remaining maturity at the time of the investment, no investment shall be made in any security other than a security underlying a repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement authorized by this section. 8.2.b In compliance with this section, the securities of Contra Costa County and its agencies shall be in safekeeping at The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A., a counterparty bank’s trust department or as defined in the debt indenture and contract. 8.3 Internal Controls: The County Treasurer is responsible for establishing and maintaining an internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the Treasurer are protected from loss, theft or misuse. Specifics for the internal controls shall be documented in an investment procedures manual that shall be reviewed and updated periodically by the County Treasurer. The internal control structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that (1) the cost of control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgements by management. As part of the internal controls, the investment portfolio managed by the County Treasurer shall be audited annually by both internal and external auditors. 9.0 AUTHORIZED BROKERS/DEALERS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS 9.1 All transactions initiated on behalf of the Pooled Investment Fund and Contra Costa County shall be executed only through one of the following: 1. Government security dealers reporting as primary dealers to the Market Reports Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; 2. Banks and financial institutions that directly issue their own securities which have been placed on the Approved List of Broker/Dealers and Financial Institutions; 3. Brokers/dealers in the State of California approved by the County Treasurer based on the reputation and expertise of the company and individuals employed. Broker/dealers and financial institutions which have exceeded the political contribution limits as contained in Rule G-37 of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board within a four year period to the County Treasurer or a member of the governing board of a local agency or any candidate for those offices, are prohibited from the Approval List of Broker/Dealers and Financial Institutions. 9.2 Qualifications: All financial institutions and broker/dealers who desire to become qualified for investment transactions must complete Contra Costa County Treasurer’s Office Broker/Dealer Due Diligence Questionnaire which can be obtained at www.cctax.us. An annual review of the approved broker/dealers will be conducted by the Treasurer’s Office. The Treasurer’s Office may request additional documents from the broker/dealers during the annual review. A broker/dealer may be deleted from the Approved Brokers list without cause and without prior notification. 9.3 List of Approved Financial Institutions, Security Brokers and Dealers CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 10 A list will be maintained of financial institutions authorized to provide investment services. In addition, a list also will be maintained of approved security broker/dealers selected for creditworthiness and qualifications stated in section 9.2. However, the County Treasury will not be limited to the financial institutions and brokers/dealers on the list. Others will be included as long as conditions for authorized financial institutions and brokers/dealers set forth in this Policy are met. Additionally, deletions and additions are based on the maintenance of required credit quality as rated by a nationally recognized statistical-rating organization (NRSRO) or reliable financial sources. 10.0 SUITABLE AND AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS 10.1 Authorized Investment Types: (Gov’t Code §53600 et seq.) The legislative body of a local agency having moneys in a sinking fund or moneys in its treasury not required for the immediate needs of the local agency may invest any portion of the moneys that it deems wise or expedient in the investments set forth below. A local agency purchasing or obtaining any securities prescribed in this section, in a negotiable, bearer, registered, or nonregistered format, shall require delivery of the securities to the local agency, including those purchased for the agency by financial advisers, consultants, or managers using the agency's funds, by book entry, physical delivery, or by third-party custodial agreement. The transfer of securities to the counterparty bank's customer book entry account may be used for book entry delivery. For purposes of this section, "counterparty" means the other party to the transaction. A counterparty bank's trust department or separate safekeeping department may be used for the physical delivery of the security if the security is held in the name of the local agency. Where this section specifies a percentage and/or rating limitation for a particular category of investment, that percentage and/or rating are applicable only at the date of purchase. Where this section does not specify a limitation on the term or remaining maturity at the time of the investment, no investment shall be made in any security, other than a security underlying a repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement authorized by this section, that at the time of the investment has a term remaining to maturity in excess of five years, unless the legislative body has granted express authority to make that investment either specifically or as a part of an investment program approved by the legislative body no less than three months prior to the investment: 10.1.a Bonds issued by the local agencies, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property, owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency or by a department, board, agency or authority of the local agency. 10.1.b United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills or certificates of indebtedness , or those for which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal and interest. 10.1.c Registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of this state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by the state or by a department, board, agency or authority of the state. 10.1.d Registered treasury notes or bonds of any of the other 49 states in addition to California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency, or authority of any of the other 49 states, in addition to California. 10.1.e Bonds, notes, warrants or other evidences of indebtedness of any local agency within this state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue-producing property owned, controlled or operated by the local agency, or by a department, board, agency or authority of the local agency. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 11 10.1.f Federal agency or United States government-sponsored enterprise obligations, participations, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by federal agencies or United States government-sponsored enterprises. 10.1.g Banker’s acceptances otherwise known as bills of exchange or time drafts drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank. Purchases of banker’s acceptances may not exceed 180 days’ maturity or 40 percent of the agency’s money that may be invested pursuant to this section. However, no more than 30 percent of the agency’s money may be invested in banker’s acceptances of any one commercial bank pursuant to this section. This subdivision does not preclude a municipal utility district from investing any money in its treasury in any manner authorized by the Municipal Utility District Act (Division 6, commencing with Section 11501, of the Public Utilities Code). 10.1.h Commercial paper of “prime” quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and number rating as provided for by a nationally recognized statistical-rating organization (NRSRO). The entity that issues the commercial paper shall meet all of the following conditions in either paragraph (1) or paragraph (2): 1. The entity meets the following criteria: A. Is organized and operating in the United States as a general corporation. B. Has total assets in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). C. Has debt other than commercial paper, if any, that is rated in a rating category of “A” or its equivalent or higher by a nationally recognized statistical-rating organization (NRSRO). 2. The entity meets the following criteria: A. Is organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or limited liability company. B. Has program-wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, over collateralization, letters of credit, or surety bond. C. Has commercial paper that is rated “A-1” or higher, or the equivalent, by a nationally recognized statistical-rating organization (NRSRO). Eligible commercial paper shall have a maximum maturity of 270 days or less. Loc al agencies, other than counties or a city and county, may invest no more than 25 percent of their moneys in eligible commercial paper. Local agencies, other than counties or a city and county, may purchase no more than 10 percent of the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer. Counties or a city and county may invest in commercial paper pursuant to the concentration limits in subdivision (a) of Section 53635: i. Not more than 40 percent of the local agency’s money may be invested in eligible commercial paper. ii. Not more than 10 percent of the total assets of the investments held by a local agency may be invested in any one issuer’s commercial paper. 10.1.i Negotiable certificates of deposit issued by a nationally- or state-chartered bank or a savings association or federal association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial Code), a state or federal credit union, or by a state-licensed branch of a foreign bank. Purchases of negotiable certificates of deposit may not exceed 30 percent of the agency’s money that may be invested pursuant to this section. For purposes of this section, negotiable certificates of deposits do not come within Article 2 (commencing with Section 53630), except that the amount so invested shall be subject to the limitations of Section CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 12 53638. The legislative body of a local agency and the treasurer or other official of the local agency having legal custody of the money are prohibited from investing local agency funds, or funds in the custody of the local agency, in negotiable certificates of deposit issued by a state or federal credit union if a member of the legislative body of the local agency, or any person with investment decision making authority in the administra tive office, manager’s office, budget office, auditor-controller’s office, or treasurer’s office of the local agency also serves on the board of directors, or any committee appointed by the board of directors, or the credit committee or the supervisory committee of the state or federal credit union issuing the negotiable certificates of deposit. 10.1.j Repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements 1. Investments in repurchase agreements or reverse repurchase agreements of any securities authorized by this section, provided that the agreements are subject to this subdivision, including the delivery requirements specified in this section, and that a signed Master Repurchase Agreement is on file in the Treasurer’s Office for all financial institutions that enter into a repurchase agreement with Contra Costa County. 2. Investments in repurchase agreements may be made on any investment authorized in this section when the term of the agreement does not exceed one year. The market value of securities that underlay a repurchase agreement shall be valued at 102 percent or greater of the funds borrowed against those securities and the value shall be adjusted no less than quarterly. Since the market value of the underlying securities is subject to daily market fluctuations, the investments in repurchase agreements shall be in compliance if the value of the underlying securities is brought back up to 102 percent no later than the next business day. 3. Reverse repurchase agreements or securities lending agreements may be utilized only when all of the following conditions are met: A. The security to be sold using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement has been owned and fully paid for by the local agency for a minimum of 30 days prior to sale. B. The total of all reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements on investments owned by the local agency does not exceed 20 percent of the base value of the portfolio. C. The agreement does not exceed a term of 92 days, unless the agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity date of the same security. D. Funds obtained or funds within the pool of an equivalent amount to that obtained from selling a security to a counterparty using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement shall not be used to purchase another security with a maturity longer than 92 days from the initial settlement date of the reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement, unless the reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity date of the same security. 4. Prior approval of the governing body; only with primary dealers: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 13 A. Investments in reverse repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements, or similar investments in which the local agency sells securities prior to purchase with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the security may be made only upon prior approval of the governing body of the local agency and shall be made only with primary dealers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or with a nationally or state-chartered bank that has or has had a significant banking relationship with a local agency. B. For purposes of this policy, "significant banking relationship" means any of the following activities of a bank: i. Involvement in the creation, sale, purchase, or retirement of a local agency's bonds, warrants, notes, or other evidence of indebtedness. ii. Financing of a local agency's activities. iii. Acceptance of a local agency's securities or funds as deposits. 5. Definitions and terms of repos, securities and securities lending: A. "Repurchase agreement" means a purchase of securities by the local agency pursuant to an agreement by which the counterparty seller will repurchase the securities on or before a specified date and for a specified amount and the counterparty will deliver the underlying securities to the local agency by book entry, physical delivery, or by third-party custodial agreement. The transfer of underlying securities to the counterparty bank's customer book-entry account may be used for book-entry delivery. B. "Securities," for purposes of repurchase under this subdivision, means securities of the same issuer, description, issue date, and maturity. C. "Reverse repurchase agreement" means a sale of securities by the local agency pursuant to an agreement by which the local agency will repurchase the securities on or before a specified date and includes other comparable agreements. D. "Securities lending agreement" means an agreement under which a local agency agrees to transfer securities to a borrower who, in turn, agrees to provide collateral to the local agency. During the term of the agreement, both the securities and the collateral are held by a third party. At the conclusion of the agreement, the securities are transferred back to the local agency in return for the collateral. E. For purposes of this section, the base value of the local agency's pool portfolio shall be that dollar amount obtained by totaling all cash balances placed in the pool by all pool participants, excluding any amounts obtained through selling securities by way of reverse repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements, or other similar borrowing methods. F. For purposes of this section, the spread is the difference between the cost of funds obtained using the reverse repurchase agreement and the earnings obtained on the reinvestment of the funds. 10.1.k Medium-term notes, defined as all corporate and depository institution debt securities with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, issued by corporations organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed by the United States or any state and operating within the United States. Notes eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of "A" or its equivalent or better by an NRSRO. Purchases of medium-term notes shall not include CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 14 other instruments authorized by this section and shall not exceed 30 percent of the agency's moneys that may be invested pursuant to this section. 10.1.l Shares of beneficial interest 1. Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies that invest in the securities and obligations as authorized by subdivisions (a) to (k), inclusive, and subdivisions (m) to (o), (q), inclusive, and that comply with the investment restrictions of this article and Article 2 (commencing with Section 53630). However, notwithstanding these restrictions, a counterparty to a reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement is not required to be a primary dealer of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York if the company's board of directors finds that the counterparty presents a minimal risk of default, and the value of the securities underlying a repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement may be 100 percent of the sales price if the securities are marked to market daily. 2. Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies that are money market funds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (l5 U.S.C. Sec. 80a-1 et seq.). 3. If investment is in shares issued pursuant to paragraph (1), the company shall have met either of the following criteria: A. Attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two NRSROs. B. Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years' experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized by subdivisions (a) to (k), inclusive, and subdivisions (m) to (o), (q), inclusive, and with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). 4. If investment is in shares issued pursuant to paragraph (2), the company shall have met the following criteria: A. Attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided by not less than two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. B. Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years' experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized by subdivisions (a) to (k), inclusive, and subdivisions (m) to (o), inclusive, and with assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). 5. The purchase price of shares of beneficial interest purchased pursuant to this subdivision shall not include any commission that the companies may charge and shall not exceed 20 percent of the agency’s money that may be invested pursuant to this section. However, no more than 10 percent of the agency’s funds may be invested in shares of beneficial interest of any one mutual fund pursuant to paragraph (1). 10.1.m Moneys held by a trustee or fiscal agent and pledged to the payment of security of bonds or other indebtedness, or obligations under a lease, installment sale, or other agreement of a local agency, or certificates of participation in those bonds, indebtedness, or lease installment sale, or other agreements, may be invested in accordance with the statutory provisions governing the issuance of those bonds, indebtedness, or lease installment sale, or other agreement, or to the extent not inconsistent therewith or if there are not specific statutory provision, in accordance with the ordinance, resolution, indenture, or agreement of the local agency providing for the issuance. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 15 10.1.n Notes, bonds, or other obligations that are at all times secured by a valid first -priority security interest in securities of the types listed by Section 53651 as eligible securities for the purpose of securing local agency deposits having a market value at least equal to that required by Section 53652 for the purpose of securing local agency deposits. The securities serving as collateral shall be placed by delivery or book entry into the custody of a trust company or the trust department of a bank that is not affiliated with the issuer of the secured obligation, and the security interest shall be perfected in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code or federal regulations applicable to the types of securities in which the security interest is granted. 10.1.o Any mortgage pass-through security, collateralized mortgage obligation, mortgage- backed or other pay-through bond, equipment lease-backed certificate, consumer receivable pass-through certificate, or consumer receivable-backed bond. Securities eligible for investment under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a NRSRO and have a maximum remaining maturity of 5 years or less. Purchase of securities authorized by this subdivision shall not exceed 20 percent of the agency’s surplus money that may be invested pursuant to this section. 10.1.p Shares of beneficial interest issued by a joint power authority organized pursuant to Section 6509.7 that invests in the securities and obligations authorized in subdivisions (a) to (n), (q), inclusive. Each share shall represent an equal proportional interest in the underlying pool of securities owned by the joint powers authority. To be eligible under this section, the joint powers authority issuing shares shall have retained an investment adviser that meets all of the following criteria: 1. The adviser is registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 2. The adviser has not less than five years of experience investing in the securities and obligations authorized in subdivisions (a) to (n), (q), inclusive. 3. The adviser has assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000). 10.1.q United States dollars denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter-American Development Bank, with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and sale within the United States. Investments under this subdivision shall be rated in a rating category of “AA” or its equivalent better by an NRSRO and shall not exceed 30 percent of the agency’s moneys that may be invested pursuant to this section. 11.0 RESTRICTIONS AND PROHIBITIONS 11.1 Restrictions set by the Treasurer 11.1.a All investments purchased by the Treasurer’s Office shall be of investment grade. The minimum credit rating of purchased investments shall be as defined by Government Code 53600 et. seq. 11.1.b All legal securities issued by a tobacco-related company are prohibited. A tobacco-related company is defined as 1) an entity that makes smoking products from tobacco used in cigarettes, cigars and/or snuff, or for smoking in pipes or 2) a company that has total revenues of 15 percent or more from the sale of such tobacco products. The tobacco- related issuers restricted from any investment are Alliance One, Altria Group, Inc., Auri Inc., British American Tobacco PLC, Imperial Tobacco Group PLC, Kirin International CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 16 Holding Inc., Lorillard, Philip Morris International, Reynolds American, Inc., Schweitzer- Mauduit International Inc., Smokefree Innotec Inc., Star Scientific Inc., Universal Corp., and Vector Group, Ltd. The Treasury staff will update the list of tobacco-related companies when necessary. 11.1.c Financial futures or financial option contracts will each be approved on a per trade basis by the County Treasurer. 11.1.d Reverse repurchase agreements will be used strictly for the purpose of supplementing income with a limit of 10 percent of the total portfolio with prior approval of the Treasurer. 11.1.e SBA loans require prior approval of the Treasurer in every transaction. 11.1.f Securities purchased through brokers will be held in safekeeping at The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. or as designated by the specific contract(s) for government securities and tri-party repurchase agreements. 11.1.g Swaps and Trades will each be approved on a per-trade basis by Treasurer or Assistant Treasurer. 11.2 Prohibitions by Government Code (§53601.6) 11.2.a A local agency shall not invest any funds pursuant to this Article or pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 53630) in inverse floaters, range notes or interest-only strips that are derived from a pool of mortgages. 11.2.b A local agency shall not invest any funds pursuant to this article or pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 53630) in any security that could result in zero interest accrual if held to maturity. However, a local agency may hold prohibited instruments until their maturity dates. The limitation in this subdivision shall not apply to local agency investments in shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. Sec. 80a-1, et seq.) that are authorized for investment pursuant to Government Code Section 53600, et. seq. 12.0 INVESTMENT PARAMETERS 12.1 Diversification: Investments shall be diversified so as to minimize the risk of loss and to maximize the rate of return by: 1. Limiting investment to avoid overconcentration in securities from a specific issuer or business sector (excluding U.S. Treasury securities), 2. Limiting investment in securities that have higher credit risks, 3. Investing in securities with varying maturities, and 4. Continuously investing a portion of the portfolio in readily available funds such as investment pools, money market funds or overnight repurchase agreements to ensure that appropriate liquidity is maintained in order to meet ongoing obligations. 12.2 Maximum Maturities: To the extent possible, the County Treasurer shall attempt to match its investments with anticipated cash flow requirements. Unless matched to a specific cash flow, the Treasurer will not directly invest in securities maturing more than five (5) years from the date of purchase or in accordance with state and local statutes and ordinances. The Treasurer shall adopt weighted average maturity limitations (which often range from 90 days to 3 years), consistent with the investment objectives. Because of inherent difficulties in accurately forecasting cash flow requirements, a portion of the portfolio should be continuously invested in readily available funds such as LAIF, money CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 17 market funds, or overnight repurchase agreements to ensure that appropriate liquidity is maintained to meet ongoing obligations. 12.3 Exception to Maximum Maturity: In accordance with Government Code, the County Treasurer retains the right to petition the Board of Supervisors for approval to invest in securities with a final maturity in excess of five years. The Board of Supervisors adoption of any resolution allowing maturities beyond five years shall be considered an allowed modification to this policy and any investments made in accordance with the modification shall be allowable under this policy. 12.4 Investment Criteria1: All limitations set forth in this Policy are applicable only at the time of purchase. The County Treasurer has the full discretion to rebalance the portfolio when it is out of compliance owing to various reasons, such as market fluctuation. INVESTMENT TYPE MAXIMUM % of PORTFOLIO MAXIMUM MATURITY MAXIMUM % of ISSUE OTHER RESTRICTIONS Bonds issued by local agencies 100% 5 years 100% U.S. Treasury Obligations 100% 5 years 100% Registered State Warrants, and CA Treasury Notes and bonds 100% 5 years 100% Registered Treasury Notes or Bonds of any of the other 49 state in addition to CA 100% 5 years 100% Bonds and Notes issued by other local agencies in California 100% 5 years 100% Obligations of U.S. Agencies or government sponsored enterprises 100% 5 years 100% U.S. Agencies Callables 100% 5 years 25% Bankers Acceptances) Domestic: ($5B min. assets) Foreign: ($5B min. assets) 40% 40% 180 days 180 days 30% Aggregate 5% Aggregate Commercial paper 40% 270 days or less 10% Aggregate No more than 10 % of the local agency’s money may be invested in the outstanding commercial paper of any single issuer. Negotiable Certificates of Deposit ($5 billion minimum assets) 30% 5 years 10% Aggregate Repurchase Agreements secured by U.S. Treasury or agency obligation (102% collateral) 100% 1 year See limitations for Treasuries and Agencies above Generally limited to Wells Fargo Bank, Bank of America or other institutions with whom the County treasury has executed tri-party agreements. Collateral will be held by a third party to the transaction that may include the trust department of particular banks. Collateral will be only securities that comply with Government Code Reverse Repurchase Agreements and Securities Lending Agreements 20% 92 days See limitations for Treasuries and Agencies above 1 The rating requirement for each investment type is referenced in the relevant sections of California Government Code. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 18 INVESTMENT TYPE MAXIMUM % of PORTFOLIO MAXIMUM MATURITY MAXIMUM % of ISSUE OTHER RESTRICTIONS Corporate bonds, Medium Term Notes & Covered 30% 5 years 5% Aggregate Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified mgt. companies 20% N/A 10% Aggregate Moneys held by a trustee or fiscal agent 20% N/A Collateralized Notes, Bonds, Time Deposits, or other obligations 15% 5 years 5% Aggregate Collateralized by the eligible securities at a percentage specified in Government Code Mrtg Backed Securities/CMO’s: Asset Backed Securities 20% 20% 5 Years 5 Years 5% Aggregate No Inverse Floaters No Range Notes No Interest only strips derived from a pool of mortgages Joint Powers Authority, CalTRUST As limited by CalTRUST N/A As limited by CalTRUST Supranational obligations 30% 5 Years 100% Rated “AA” or better by an NRSRO Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) As Limited by LAIF N/A As limited by LAIF 13.0 EXTERNALLY MANAGED INVESTMENT POOLS, MUTUAL FUNDS AND SEPARATE ACCOUNTS The County Treasurer may investment a portion of the investment pool assets in investment pools, mutual funds, and separate account investment funds managed by the external investment managers. A thorough due diligence shall be conducted on the external investment managers and the pool/funds prior to investing, and on a continual basis. 14.0 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY 14.1 Passive Portfolio Management: (See Section 6.0., General Strategy) 14.2 Purchase of Investment Securities: Investment Securities will be purchased in the most cost effective and efficient manner by using a competitive bidding process. However, the investment securities may or may not carry the highest coupon or yield at the time of purchase after taking into consideration the various limitations of the Investment Policy and risks. 14.3 Reviewing and Monitoring of the Portfolio: The portfolio is closely monitored on a regular basis for compliance purposes. Both monthly and quarterly reports will review portfolio investments to ensure they are kept track of in a timely manner. The reports will also monitor the County Treasurer’s investment practices and the results of such practices. 14.4 Portfolio Adjustments: Certain actions may be taken if the portfolio becomes out of compliance. For instance, should a concentration limitation be exceeded due to an incident such as a fluctuation in portfolio size, the affected securities may be held to maturity to avoid losses; however, the County Treasurer may choose to rebalance the portfolio earlier to bring it back into compliance if the portfolio will not suffer any losses for selling the investment prior to maturity. 14.5 Performance Standards: The investment portfolio will be managed in accordance with the parameters specified within this Policy. The portfolio should obtain a market average rate of return during a CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 19 market/economic environment of stable interest rates. A series of appropriate benchmarks, such as 6-month US Treasury Bill, Fed Funds Rates Index, may be established against which portfolio performance shall be compared on a regular basis. However, the benchmarks may change as appropriate based on the duration of the investment pool and/or cash flow requirements. 15.0 REPORTING 15.1 Methodology: The County Treasurer shall prepare an investment report at least quarterly, including a management summary that provides an analysis of the status of the current investment portfolio and transactions made over the last quarter. This management summary will be prepared in a manner which will allow the County Treasurer to ascertain whether investment activities during the reporting period have conformed to the investment policy. The report shall be provided to the Chief Administrative Officer, the County Auditor, the Board of Supervisors, Treasury Oversight Committee and any pool participants [Government Code 27133(e), and 53646(b)]. The report will include the following: 1. The type of investment, issuer, date of maturity, par and dollar amount invested on all securities, investments and moneys held by the County Treasurer 2. A description of any of the local agency's funds, investments, or programs that are under the management of contracted parties, including lending programs. 3. A current market value as of the date of the report of all securities held by the local agency, and under management of any outside party that is not also a local agency or the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund, and the source of this same valuation. 4. A statement that the portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy, or the manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance. 5. A statement denoting the ability of the County Treasurer to meet its pool's expenditure requirements for the next six months, or an explanation as to why sufficient money may not be available. 6. Listing of individual securities by type and maturity date held at the end of the reporting period. A. PLEDGE REPORT: Any securities that are pledged or loaned for any purpose shall be reported in the Quarterly Investment Report. The transaction detail will be provided, including purpose, beginning and termination dates and all parties to the contract. The security descriptions as to type, name, maturity date, coupon rate, CUSIP and other material information will be included. B. REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS REPORT: All reverse repurchase agreements entered into, whether active or inactive by the end of each quarter, shall be reported in the Treasurer’s Quarterly Investment Report. 7. Realized and unrealized gains or losses resulting from appreciation or depreciation by listing the cost and market value of securities over one-year duration that are not intended to be held until maturity. 8. Average maturity and duration of portfolio on investments as well as the yield to maturity of the portfolio as compared to applicable benchmarks. 9. Percentage of the total portfolio which each type of investment represents. 10. Whatever additional information or data may be required by the legislative body of the local agency. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 20 15.2 Marking to Market: The market value of the portfolio shall be calculated at least quarterly and a statement of the market value of the portfolio shall be issued at least quarterly. This will ensure that review of the investment portfolio, in terms of value and price volatility, has been performed on a regular basis. 16.0 COMPENSATION In accordance with Government Code §§27013 and 53684, the County Treasurer will charge all pool participants for administrative and overhead costs. Costs include, but are not limited to, employee salaries and benefits, portfolio management, bank and custodial fees, software maintenance fees and other indirect costs incurred from handling and managing funds. In addition, when applicable, the costs associated with the Treasury Oversight provisions of Government Code §§ 27130-27137 shall be included as administrative costs. Costs will be deducted from interest earnings on the pool prior to apportioning and payment of interest. The County Treasurer shall annually prepare a proposed budget providing a detailed itemization of all estimated costs which comprise the administrative fee charged in accordance with Government Code §27013. The administrative fee will be subject to change. Fees will be deducted from interest earnings. 16.1 Deduction of Costs: At the discretion of the County Treasurer, the County Treasurer may deduct actual administrative costs and may make any adjustments from the interest earnings and apportions the remaining earnings to all participants based on the positive average daily balance (Government Code 53684(b)). 16.2 Directed Investments Costs: At the discretion of the County Treasurer, the County Treasurer may deduct from interest earnings the actual administrative costs of such directed investments (Government Code §27013). 17.0 CALCULATING AND APPORTIONING POOL EARNINGS The Investment Pool Fund is comprised of monies from multiple units of the County, agencies, school districts and special districts. Each entity has unique cash flow demands, which dictate the type of investments the Treasurer’s Office may purchase. To ensure parity among the pool members when apportioning interest earnings, the following procedures have been developed: 1. Interest is apportioned on at least a quarterly basis in accordance with Government Code §53684. 2. Interest is apportioned to pool participants based on the participant’s average daily fund balance and the total average daily balance of deposits in the investment pool. 3. Interest is calculated on a cash basis for all investments in the County Treasurer’s investment pool and reported to the Auditor-Controller for distribution into the funds of the participants. 4. Interest earned on the directed investments is credited to pool participants on a cash basis. Administrative costs are determined annually by the County Treasurer based on actual administrative and overhead costs incurred in the previous year. 5. Negative average daily fund balance will be charged interest at the rate of interest that is being apportioned. 18.0 DEPOSITS AND WITHDRAWALS IN THE TREASURY 18.1 Deposit by Voluntary Participants CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 21 Following are the terms and conditions for deposit of funds for investment purposes by voluntary participants, i.e. entities that are not legally required to deposit their funds in the County Treasury. 18.1.a Resolution by the County Board of Supervisors authorizing the acceptance of outside participants by the County Treasury. 18.1.b Resolution by the legislative or governing body of the local agency (voluntary participant) authorizing the investment of funds pursuant to Government Code 53684. 18.1.c Treasury investments will be directed transactions. For each transaction, the local agency (voluntary participant) must indicate the fund source, the amount to be invested and the duration of the investment. 18.2 Withdrawal Request The Treasurer’s Office has established the Withdrawal of Funds Policy for all Treasury Investment Pool participants who seek to withdraw funds from the County Treasury Investment Pool for various purposes. In accordance with California State Government Code Section 27136, all participants having funds on deposit in the Pool and seeking to withdraw their funds, shall first submit a formal written request to the County Treasurer. The County Treasurer shall evaluate the withdrawal proposals of all Pool participants upon receipt of the written requests. The evaluation process may take up to 30 days. The County Treasurer reserves the right to reject any request for withdrawal if it is in the Treasurer’s opinion after thorough evaluation, that the withdrawal will violate applicable laws and/or governing documents, compromise Treasurer’s fiduciary responsibility, adversely impact the stability of the Pool, or harm the interests of any Pool Participant. Such rejection shall prevent the withdrawal of the funds. Typically, participants make withdrawals for the following two reasons: a) regular operations and b) investing or depositing funds outside the Pool in accordance with California State Government Code Section 27136 (a). The County Treasurer seeks to honor all written withdrawal requests for regular operating purposes that are approved by the County Auditor-Controller’s Office in a timely fashion. However, the County Treasurer recognizes that occasionally the Pool participants may request large amounts in withdrawals to cover unexpected operational needs. To accommodate such withdrawals and allow for adequate time for adjustments to the liquidity position of the Pool, the County Treasurer expects all Pool Participants to submit their written requests within the following timeframes: i) Withdrawals of Up to $1 million – prior to 8:00 a.m. for same day disbursement ii) Withdrawals of between $1 million to $10 million – 1 business day in advance of disbursement iii) Withdrawals of more than $10 million – 3 business day in advance of disbursement Withdrawals of investment deposits from the County Treasury Investment Pool by any Pool participant shall coincide with investment maturities and/or authorized sale of securities by authorized personnel of the Pool Participant. Except for funds in the California State Local Agency Investment Fund, a five-business-days notification may be required when authorized sale of securities is involved. In the event that the Treasurer must liquidate investments in order to honor the withdrawal request, the Participant who requests the withdrawal shall be subject to all expenses associated with the liquidation, including, but not limited to loss of principal and interest income, withdrawal penalties, and associated fees. To maintain full fiduciary responsibility for investment and administration of the Pool, the County Treasurer shall NOT permit statutory participants to withdraw funds from and subsequently deposit the funds outside the Pool for the purpose of investments without prior approval of the County Treasurer. As permitted by the Government Code Section 53635, upon request the County Treasurer may enter into an investment agreement with a third party investment manager CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 22 on behalf of statutory participants. However, the funds shall remain in the Pool during the entire agreement period under the care of the custodian bank retained by the County Treasurer. Voluntary participants may withdraw funds from and subsequently deposit the funds outside the Pool for investment purposes upon the County Treasurer’s approval. However, such withdrawals shall be made for the entire amount of the participant’s funds deposited in the Pool. Upon completion of such withdrawals, the voluntary participants will no longer be able to participate in the Pool or receive further services from the County Treasurer’s Office. NO partial withdrawals from the Pool for investment purposes are permitted. Please refer to Withdrawal of Funds Policy, which is maintained as a separate document, for detailed guidelines and procedures. 19.0 TEMPORARY BORROWING OF POOL FUNDS Section 6 of Article XVI of the California Constitution provides in part that "the treasurer of any city, county, or city and county shall have power and the duty to make such temporary transfers from the funds in custody as may be necessary to provide funds for meeting the obligations incurred for maintenance purposes by city, county, city and county, district, or other political subdivision whose funds are in custody and are paid out solely through the treasurer's office." The County Auditor-Controller and the County Treasurer shall make a temporary transfer of funds to the requesting agency, not to exceed 85% of the amount of money which will accrue to the agency during the fiscal year, provided that the amount of such transfer has been determined by the County Auditor-Controller to be transferable under the constitutional and statutory provisions cited in Article XVI and has been certified by the County Treasurer-Tax Collector to be available. Such temporary transfer of funds shall not be made prior to the first day of the fiscal year nor after the last Monday in April of the current fiscal year. 20.0 INVESTMENT OF BOND PROCEEDS The County Treasurer shall invest bond proceeds using the standards of this Investment Policy. The bond proceeds will be invested in securities permitted by the bond documents. If the bond documents are silent, the bond proceeds will be invested in securities permitted by this Policy. 21.0 DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN The Contra Costa County Treasurer’s Disaster Recovery Plan includes critical phone numbers and addresses of key personnel as well as active bankers and brokers/dealers. Laptops, tablets, smart phones, and other equivalent electronic devices shall be issued to key personnel for communicating between staff, bank and broker/dealers. Copies of the plan shall be distributed to the investment staff: Assistant County Treasurer, the Treasurer’s Investment Officer, and the Investment Operations Analyst. The investment staff shall interact with one another by home phone, cell phone, or e-mail to decide an alternate location from which to conduct daily operations. In the event investment staff is unable to conduct normal business operations, the custodial bank will automatically sweep all uninvested cash into an interest bearing account at the end of the business day. Until normal business operations have been restored, the limitations on the size of an individual issuer and the percentage restrictions by investment type would be allowed to exceed those approved in this investment policy. 22.0 POLICY CONSIDERATIONS 22.1 Exemption CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 23 Any investment currently held that does not meet the guidelines of this policy shall be exempted from the requirements of this policy. At maturity or liquidation, such monies shall be reinvested only as provided by this policy. 22.2 Amendments This policy shall be reviewed on an annual basis. Any changes must be approved by the County Treasurer and any other appropriate authority. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 24 AUTHORIZATION FOR LAIF INVESTMENTS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 25 APPROVED BROKERS Alamo Capital Bank of America Merrill Lynch California Arbitrage Management Program Citigroup Global Markets Daiwa Capital Markets America Inc. Falcon Square Capital JP Morgan Securities LLC Mischler Financial Group Mutual Securities, Inc. Penserra Securities LLC Public Financial Management, Incorporated RBC Capital Markets, LLC Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. UBS Financial Services, Inc. UnionBanc Investment Services Wells Fargo Securities Note: The County Treasury will not be limited to the above list. Others will be included as long as all conditions for authorized brokers and/or dealers set forth in this policy are met. Additionally, deletions and additions are based on many factors including the quality of services provided by the broker/dealers. The County Treasury reserves the right to delete an Approved Broker without cause and without prior notice. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 26 APPROVED ISSUERS American Honda Finance Apple Inc Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Bank of America Bank of Montreal Bank of Nova Scotia Berkshire Hathaway BNP Paribas Chevron Cisco Systems Inc Citibank Coca-Cola Co. Commonwealth of Bank of Australia Credit Agricole SA Credit Suisse Deere & Company Deutsche Bank Financial LLC Exxon Mobil Prudential Procter & Gamble Co Rabobank Nederland New York Royal Bank of Canada Societe Generale NA Standard Chartered Bank State Street Bank and Trust Co Svenska Handelsbanken AB Toronto-Dominion Bank Toyota Motor Credit Corp UBS Financial US Bankcorp Walmart Walt Disney Company Wells Fargo Bank Westpac Banking Corp Westamerica Bank General Electric Co General Electric Capital Corp HSBC Bank USA Intel Corp JP Morgan Chase & Co John Deere Capital Corporation Johnson & Johnson McDonald’s Corporation MicroSoft Corp MUFG Bank National Australia Bank Nestle Capital Corp Nordea Bank AB Oracle Corp Pepsico Inc PNC Bank NA Note: The County Treasury may or may not invest in the Approved Issuers and will not be limited to the above list in making investments. Other issuers may be considered as the County Treasury performs additional due diligence on each investment decision. The list does not reflect the actual portfolio holdings managed by the County Treasury. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 27 APPROVED PRIMARY DEALERS Amherst Pierpont Securities LLC Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency BMO Capital Markets Corp. BNP Paribas Securities Corp. Barclays Capital Inc. BofA Securities, Inc. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. Credit Suisse AG, New York Branch Daiwa Capital Markets America Inc. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. Jefferies LLC J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. Mizuho Securities USA Inc. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC NatWest Markets International, Inc. Nomura Securities International, Inc. RBC Capital Markets, LLC Societe Generale, New York Branch TD Securities (USA) LLC UBS Securities LLC. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC Note: The above list consists of primary dealers that serve as trading counterparties of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in its implementation of monetary policy. These primary dealers are required to participate in all auctions of U.S. government debt. Treasury Staff will perform additional due diligence on each investment decision, and hence, may or may not use the primary dealers listed above. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 28 CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE For the TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR’S OFFICE This Conflict of Interest Code is promulgated under the authority of the Political Reform Act, Government Code §81000, et seq., which requires all state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of interest codes. Section 18730 of Title 2, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations, as adopted by the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) contains the terms of a standard conflict o f interest code, which may be incorporated by reference and may be amended by the FPPC after public note and hearings to conform to amendments in the Political Reform Act. Therefore, the terms of Section 18730 of Title 2, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations and any amendments to it duly adopted by the FPPC are hereby incorporated by reference and, along with the below stated Disclosure Categories, constitute the Conflict of Interest Code of the Treasurer-Tax Collector’s Office of Contra Costa County. Employees in designated positions below shall file a Statement of Economic Interest (Form 700) with the Executive Secretary, designated as the filing officer, who will make the statements available for public inspection and reproduction. (California Government Code §81008) Upon receipt of the statements for the Treasurer-Tax Collector and positions that manage public investments, the Filing Officer will make and retain copies and forward the originals to the Contra Costa County Clerk-Recorder- Elections Department. (Government Code § 87500) DESIGNATED POSITIONS CLASS/JOB CODE TITLE ASSIGNED CATEGORY County Treasurer-Tax Collector* 1 Assistant County Treasurer 1 Chief Deputy Treasurer-Tax Collector 1 Treasurer’s Investment Officer* 1 Treasurer’ Investment Operations Analyst 1 Tax Operations Supervisor 1 Executive Secretary – Exempt 2 Treasurer Oversight Committee members 2 Consultants** 1 * Pursuant to Government Code section 87314, the individuals occupying these designated positions are required to file a Form 700-Statement of Economic Interests as a public official who manages public investments within the meaning of Government Code Section 87200. ** The Treasurer-Tax Collector will determine in writing whether a consultant is hired to perform a range of duties that requires the consultant to comply with the disclosure requirements. The written determination is a public record and the Filing Officer will retain the determination for public inspection. DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES General Rule CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 29 An investment, interest in real property, or income is reportable if the business entity in which the investment is held, the interest in real property, or the income or source of income may foreseeably be affected materially by any decision made or participated in by the designated employee by virtue of the employee’s position. 1. Designated Employees in Category “1” must report: a. All investments, interests in real property, and income, and any business entity in which the employee is a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or hold any position in management. Financial interests are reportable only if located within Contra Costa County or if the business entity is doing business or planning to do business in the County (and such plans are known by the designated employee) or has done business within the County at any time during the two years prior to the filing of the statement. b. Investments in any business entity, and income from any source and status as a director, officer, p artner, trustee, employee, or hold of a position of management in any business entity, which has within the last two years contracted or foreseeably may contract with Contra Costa County, or with any special district or other public agency within the County, to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment to such County, district, or public agency. 2. Designated Employees in Category “2” must report: Investments in any business entity, income from any source and status as a director, officer, partner, trustee, employee or holder of a position of management in any business entity, which has within the last two years contracted, or foreseeably may contract, with Contra Costa County to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment to the Office the Treasurer-Tax Collector. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 30 GLOSSARY OF TERMS ACCRUED INTEREST The accumulated interest due on a bond as of the last interest payment made by the issuer. AGENCY A debt security issued by a federal or federally sponsored agency. Federal agencies are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Federally sponsored agencies (FSAs) are backed by each particular agency with a market perception that there is an implicit government guarantee. An example of federal agency is the Government National mortgage Association (GNMA). An example of a FSA is the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA). AMORTIZATION The systematic reduction of the amount owed on a debt issue through periodic payments of principal. AVERAGE LIFE The average length of time that an issue of serial bonds and/or term bonds with a mandatory sinking fund feature is expected to be outstanding. BANKERS ACCEPTANCES A time bill of exchange drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank to finance the exchange of goods. When a bank “accepts” such a bill, the time draft becomes, in effect, a predated, certified check payable to the bearer at some future specified date. The commercial bank assumes primary liability once the draft is accepted. BASIS POINT A unit of measurement used in the valuation of fixed-income securities equal to 1/100 of one percent of yield. For example, if interest rates increase from 8.25% to 8.50%, the difference is referred to as a 25-basis-point increase. BENCHMARK A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment portfolio. A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration of the portfolio’s investment. BID The indicated price at which a buyer is willing to purchase a security or commodity. BLUE SKY LAWS Common term for state securities law, which vary from state to state. Generally refers to provision related to prohibitions against fraud, dealer and broker regulations and securities registration. BOND A bond is essentially a loan made by an investor to a division of the government, a government agency or a corporation. The bond is a promissory note to repay the loan in full at the end of a fixed time period. The date on which the principal must be repaid is called the maturity date or maturity. In addition, the issuer of the bond, that is the agency or corporation receiving the loan proceeds and issuing the promissory note, agrees to make regular payments of interest at a rate initially stated on the bond. Bonds are rated according to many factors, including cost, degree of risk and rate of income. BOOK VALUE Refers to value of a held security as carried in the records of an investor. May differ from current market value of the security. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 31 BROKER/DEALER Any person engaged in the business of effecting transaction in securities in this state for the account of others or for her/his own account. Broker/dealer also includes a person engaged in the regular business of issuing or guaranteeing options with regard to securities not of her/his own issue. CALLABLE BOND A bond issue in which all or part of its outstanding principal amount may be redeemed before maturity by the issuer under specified conditions. CALL PRICE The price at which an issuer may redeem a bond prior to maturity. The price is usually at a slight premium to the bond’s original issue price to compensate the holder for the loss of income and ownership. CALL RISK The risk to the bondholder that a bond may be redeemed prior to maturity. CASH SALE/PURCHASE A transaction which calls for delivery and payment of securities on the same day that the transaction is initiated. CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (CD) Certificates issued against funds deposited in a commercial bank for a definite period of time and earning a specified rate of return. They are issued in two forms, negotiable and non-negotiable. CLEAN UP CALL An action of a debt instrument issuer requiring early redemption of the instrument to reduce its own administrative expenses. This normally occurs when the principal outstanding is significantly reduced to a small amount, e.g., less than 10% of the original issue. COLLATERALIZATION Process by which a borrower pledges securities, property, or other deposits for the purpose of securing the repayment of a loan and/or security. COMMERCIAL PAPER Short-term, unsecured promissory notes issued in either registered or bearer form and usually backed by a line of credit with a bank. Maturities do not exceed 270 days and generally average 30-45 days. CONVEXITY A measure of a bond’s price sensitivity to changing interest rates. A high convexity indicates greater sensitivity of a bond’s price to interest rate changes. COUPON RATE The annual rate of interest received by an investor from the issuer of certain types of fixed-income securities. Also known as the “interest rate.” CREDIT QUALITY The measurement of the financial strength of a bond issuer. This measurement helps an investor to understand an issuer’s ability to make timely interest payments and repay the loan principal upon maturity. Generally, the higher the credit quality of a bond issuer, the lower the interest rate paid by the issuer because the risk of default is lower. Credit quality ratings are provided by nationally recognized rating agencies. CREDIT RISK The risk to an investor that an issuer will default in the payment of interest and/or principal on a security. CURRENT YIELD (CURRENT RETURN) A yield calculation determined by dividing the annual interest received on a security by the current market price of that security. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 32 CUSIP NUMBERS CUSIP is an acronym for Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures. CUSIP numbers are identification numbers assigned each maturity of a security issue and usually printed on the face of each individual security in the issue. The CUSIP numbers are intended to facilitate identification and clearance of securities. DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT (DVP) A type of securities transaction in which the purchaser pays for the securities when they are delivered either to the purchaser or his/her custodian. DERIVATIVE SECURITY Financial instrument created from, or whose value depends upon, one or more underlying assets or indexes of asset values. DISCOUNT The amount by which the par value of a security exceeds the price paid for the security. DIVERSIFICATION A process of investing assets among a range of security types by sector, maturity, and quality rating. DURATION A measure of the timing of the cash flows, such as the interest payments and the principal repayment, to be received from a given fixed-income security. This calculation is based on three variables: term to maturity, coupon rate, and yield to maturity. The duration of a security is a useful indicator of its price volatility for given changes in interest rates. EARNINGS APPORTIONMENT The quarterly interest distribution of the Pool Participants where the actual investment costs incurred by the Treasurer are deducted from the interest earnings of the Pool FAIR VALUE The amount at which an investment could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. FEDERAL FUNDS (FED FUNDS) Funds placed in Federal Reserve banks by depository institutions in excess of current reserve requirements. These depository institutions may lend fed funds to each other overnight or on a longer basis. They may also transfer funds among each other on a same-day basis through the Federal Reserve banking system. Fed funds are considered to be immediately available funds. FEDERAL FUNDS RATE Interest rate charged by one institution lending federal funds to the other. FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE (FOMC) This committee sets Federal Reserve guidelines regarding purchases and sales of government securities in the open market as a means of influencing the volume of bank credit and money. FIDUCIARY An individual who holds something in trust for another and bears liability for its safekeeping. FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY (FINRA) FINRA is an independent, nongovernmental organization that writes and enforces the rules governing registered brokers and broker-dealer firms in the United States. Its stated mission is “to safeguard the investing public against fraud and bad practices.” FINRA regulates the trading of equities, corporate bonds, securities futures, and options. Unless a firm is regulated by a different self-regulatory organization, it is required to be a FINRA member firm to do business. FLOATING RATE NOTE A debt security whose interest rate is reset periodically (monthly, quarterly, annually) and is based on a market index (e.g., Treasury bills, LIBOR, etc.). CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 33 FUTURES Commodities and other investments sold to be delivered at a future date. GOVERNMENT SECURITIES An obligation of the U.S. government, backed by the full faith and credit of the government. These securities are regarded as the highest quality of investment securities available in the U.S. securities market. See “Treasury Bills, Notes and Bonds.” INTEREST RATE See “Coupon Rate.” INTERNAL CONTROLS An internal control structure is designed to ensure that the assets of the Treasurer’s Investment Pool are protected from loss, theft, or misuse, and to provide reasonable assurance that this objective is met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. Internal controls should address the following points: 1. Control of collusion—Collusion is a situation where two or more employees are working in conjunction to defraud their employer. 2. Separation of transaction authority from accounting and record keeping—By separating the person who authorizes or performs the transaction from the people who record or otherwise account for the transaction, a separation of duties is achieved. 3. Custodial safekeeping—Securities purchased from a bank or dealer including appropriate collateral (as defined by state law) shall be placed with an independent third party for custodial safekeeping. 4. Avoidance of physical delivery securities—Book-entry securities are much easier to transfer and account for since actual delivery of a document never takes place. Delivered securities must be properly safeguarded against loss or destruction. The potential for fraud and loss increases with physically delivered securities. 5. Clear delegation of authority to subordinate staff members—Subordinate staff members must have a clear understanding of their authority and responsibilities to avoid improper actions. Clear delegation of authority also preserves the internal control structure that is contingent on the various staff positions and their respective responsibilities. 6. Written confirmation of transactions for investments and wire transfers—Due to the potential for error and improprieties arising from telephone and electronic transactions, all transactions should be supported by written communications and approved by the appropriate person. Written communications may be via fax if on letterhead and if the safekeeping institution has a list of authorized signatures. 7. Development of a wire transfer agreement with the lead bank and third-party custodian—The designated official should ensure that an agreement will be entered into and will address the following points: controls, security provisions, and responsibilities of each party making and receiving wire transfers. INVERSE FLOATERS An adjustable interest rate note keyed to various indices such as LIBOR, commercial paper, federal funds, treasuries and derivative structures. The defined interest rate formula is the opposite or inverse of these indices. Interest rates and pay dates may reset daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, semi-annually or annually. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 34 INVERTED YIELD CURVE A chart formation that illustrates long-term securities having lower yields than short-term securities. This configuration usually occurs during periods of high inflation coupled with low levels of confidence in the economy and a restrictive monetary policy. INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 Federal legislation which sets the standards by which investment companies, such as mutual funds, are regulated in the areas of advertising, promotion, performance reporting requirements, and securities valuations. INVESTMENT POLICY A concise and clear statement of the objectives and parameters formulated by the investor or investment manager for a portfolio of investment securities. INVESTMENT-GRADE OBLIGATIONS An investment instrument suitable for purchase by institutional investors under the prudent person rule. Investment-grade is restricted to those obligations rated BBB or higher by a rating agency. LIQUIDITY Usually refers to the ability to convert assets (such as investments) into cash. LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) The State of California investment pool in which money of local agencies is pooled as a method for managing and investing local funds. MAKE WHOLE CALL A type of call provision on a bond allowing the borrower to pay off remaining debt early. The borrower has to make a lump sum payment derived from a formula based on the net present value of future coupon payments that will not be paid because of the call. MARK TO MARKET Valuing the inventory of held securities at its current market value. MARKET RISK The risk that the value of a security will rise or decline as a result of changes in market conditions. MARKET VALUE Price at which a security can be traded in the current market. MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT A written contract covering all future transactions between the parties to repurchase-reverse repurchase agreements that establishes each party’s rights in the transaction. A master agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer-lender to liquidate the underlying securities in the event of default by the seller-borrower. MATURITY The date upon which the principal of a security becomes due and payable to the holder. MEDIUM-TERM NOTES (MTNS) Corporate debt obligations continuously offered in a broad range of maturities. MTNs were created to bridge the gap between commercial paper and corporate bonds. The key characteristic of MTNs is that they are issued on a continuous basis. MONEY MARKET INSTRUMENTS Private and government obligations of one year or less. MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS Mutual funds that invest solely in money market instruments (short- term debt instruments, such as Treasury bills, commercial paper, banker’s acceptances, repos and federal funds). MUTUAL FUND An investment company that pools money and can invest in a variety of securities, including fixed-income securities and money market instruments. Mutual funds are regulated by the CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 35 Investment Company Act of 1940 and must abide by the following Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) disclosure guidelines: 1. Report standardized performance calculations. 2. Disseminate timely and accurate information regarding the fund’s holdings, performance, management and general investment policy. 3. Have the fund’s investment policies and activities supervised by a board of trustees, which are independent of the adviser, administrator or other vendor of the fund. 4. Maintain the daily liquidity of the fund’s shares. 5. Value their portfolios on a daily basis. 6. Have all individuals who sell SEC-registered products licensed with a self-regulating organization (SRO) such as the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD). 7. Have an investment policy governed by a prospectus which is updated and filed by the SEC annually. MUTUAL FUND STATISTICAL SERVICES Companies that track and rate mutual funds, e.g., IBC/Donoghue, Lipper Analytical Services and Morningstar. NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT May be sold by one holder to another prior to maturity. This is possible because the issuing bank agrees to pay the amount of the deposit plus interest earned to the bearer of the certificate at maturity. NET ASSET VALUE The market value of one share of an investment company, such as a mutual fund. This figure is calculated by totaling a fund’s assets which includes securities, cash, and any accrued earnings, subtracting this from the fund’s liabilities and dividing this total by the number of shares outstanding. This is calculated once a day based on the closing price for each security in the fund’s portfolio. (See below) [(Total assets) – (Liabilities]/(Number of shares outstanding) NO LOAD FUND A mutual fund which does not levy a sales charge on the purchase of its shares. NOMINAL YIELD The stated rate of interest that a bond pays its current owner, based on par value of the security. It is also known as the “coupon,” “coupon rate,” or “interest rate.” NON-NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT For public funds, these certificates are collateralized and are not money market instruments since they cannot be traded in the secondary market. They are issued on a fixed-maturity basis and often pay higher interest rates than are permissible on other savings or time-deposit accounts. OFFER The price of a security at which a person is willing to sell. OPTION A contract that provides the right, but not the obligation, to buy or to sell a specific amount of a specific security within a predetermined time period. A call option provides the right to buy the underlying security. A put option provides the right to sell the underlying security. The seller of the contracts is called the writer. PAR Face value of principal value of a bond, typically $1,000 per bond. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 36 PAR VALUE The stated or face value of a security expressed as a specific dollar amount marked on the face of the security; the amount of money due at maturity. Par value should not be confused with market value. POSITIVE YIELD CURVE A chart formation that illustrates short-term securities having lower yields than long-term securities. PREMIUM The amount by which the price paid for a security exceeds par value, generally representing the difference between the nominal interest rate and the actual or effective return to the investor. PRIME RATE A preferred interest rate charged by commercial banks to their most creditworthy customers. Many interest rates are keyed to this rate. PRINCIPAL The face value or par value of a debt instrument. Also may refer to the amount of capital invested in a given security. PROSPECTUS A legal document that must be provided to any prospective purchaser of a new securities offering registered with the SEC. This can include information on the issuer, the issuer’s business, the proposed use of proceeds, the experience of the issuer’s management, and certain certified financial statements. PRUDENT PERSON RULE An investment standard outlining the fiduciary responsibilities of public funds investors relating to investment practices. RANGE NOTES A security whose rate of return is pegged to an index. The note defines the interest rate minimum or floor and the interest rate maximum or cap. An example of an index may be federal funds. The adjustable rate of interest is determined within the defined range of the funds. RATE OF RETURN The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market price. This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond and the current income return. REINVESTMENT RISK The risk that a fixed-income investor will be unable to reinvest income proceeds from a security holding at the same rate of return currently generated by that holding. REPURCHASE AGREEMENT OR RP OR REPO An agreement consisting of two simultaneous transactions whereby the investor purchases securities from a bank or dealer and the bank or dealer agrees to repurchase the securities at the same price on a certain future date. The interest rate on a RP is that which the dealer pays the investor for the use of his funds. Reverse repurchase agreements are the mirror image of the RPs when the bank or dealer purchases securities from the investor under an agreement to sell them back to the investor. REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (REVERSE REPO) An agreement of one party to sell securities at a specified price to a second party and a simultaneous agreement of the first party to repurchase the securities at a specified price or at a specified later date. RULE 2A-7 OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT Applies to all money market mutual funds and mandates such funds to maintain certain standards, including a 13-month maturity limit and a 90-day average maturity on investments, to help maintain a constant net asset value of one dollar ($1.00). SAFEKEEPING Holding of assets (e.g., securities) by a financial institution. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 37 SECURITIES LENDING A transaction wherein the Treasurer’s Pool transfers its securities to a broker/dealer or other entities for collateral which may be cash or securities and simultaneously agrees to return the collateral for the same securities in the future. SERIAL BOND A bond issue, usually of a municipality, with various maturity dates scheduled at regular intervals until the entire issue is retired. SETTLEMENT DATE The date used in price and interest computations, usually the date of delivery. SINKING FUND Money accumulated on a regular basis in a separate custodial account that is used to redeem debt securities or preferred stock issues. SLUGS An acronym for State and Local Government Series. SLUGS are special United States Government securities sold by the Secretary of the Treasury to states, municipalities and other local government bodies through individual subscription agreements. The interest rates and maturities of SLUGS are arranged to comply with arbitrage restrictions imposed under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code. SLUGS are most commonly used for deposit in escrow in connection with the issuance of refunding bonds. STRIPS US Treasury acronym for “separate trading of registered interest and principal of securities." Certain registered Treasury securities can be divided into separate interest and principal components, which may then be traded as separate entities. SUPRANATIONAL Supranational is an international organization, or union, whereby member states transcend national boundaries or interests to share in the decision-making and vote on issues pertaining to the wider grouping. Examples of supranational are International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, International Finance Corporation, European Union, and World Trade Organization. SWAP Generally refers to an exchange of securities, with essentially the same par value, but may vary in coupon rate, type of instrument, name of issuer and number of days to maturity. The purpose of the SWAP may be to enhance yield, to shorten the maturity or any benefit deemed by the contracting parties. TERM BONDS Bonds comprising a large part or all of a particular issue which come due in a single maturity. The issuer usually agrees to make periodic payments into a sinking fund for mandatory redemption of term bonds before maturity. TOTAL RETURN The sum of all investment income plus changes in the capital value of the portfolio. For mutual funds, return on an investment is composed of share price appreciation plus any realized dividends or capital gains. This is calculated by taking the following components during a certain time period: (Price Appreciation) + (Dividends paid) + (Capital gains) = Total Return TREASURY SECURITIES Debt obligations of the United States Government sold by the Treasury Department in the form of bills, notes and bonds: 1. Bills Short-term obligations that mature in one year or less and are sold at a discount in lieu of paying periodic interest. 2. Notes Interest-bearing obligations that mature between one year and 10 years. 3. Bonds Interest-bearing long-term obligations that generally mature in 10 years or more. CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2019-2020 Page 38 UNIFORM NET CAPITAL RULE SEC Rule 15C3-1 outlining capital requirements for broker/dealers. U.S. AGENCY OBLIGATIONS Federal agency or United States government-sponsored enterprise obligations, participants, or other instruments. The obligations are issued by or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by federal agencies or United States government-sponsored enterprises. U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS Securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. Treasuries are considered to have no credit risk and are the benchmark for interest rates on all other securities in the U.S. and overseas. The Treasury issues both discounted securities and fixed coupon notes and bonds. VOLATILITY A degree of fluctuation in the price and valuation of securities. “VOLATILITY RISK” RATING A rating system to clearly indicate the level of volatility and other non-credit risks associated with securities and certain bond funds. The ratings for bond funds range from those that have extremely low sensitivity to changing market conditions and offer the greatest stability of the returns (“S1+” by S&P) to those that are highly sensitive with currently identifiable market volatility risk (“S6” by S&P). WEIGHTED AVERAGE MATURITY (WAM) The average maturity of all the securities that comprise a portfolio. According to SEC rule 2a-7, the WAM for SEC registered money market mutual funds may not exceed 90 days and no one security may have a maturity that exceeds 397 days. WHEN ISSUED (WI) A conditional transaction in which an authorized new security has not been issued. All “when issued” transactions are settled when the actual security is issued. YIELD The current rate of return on an investment security generally expressed as a percentage of the security’s current price. YIELD-TO-CALL (YTC) The rate of return an investor earns from a bond assuming the bond is redeemed (called) prior to its nominal maturity date. YIELD CURVE A graphic representation that depicts the relationship at a given point in time between yields and maturity for bonds that are identical in every way except maturity. A normal yield curve may be alternatively referred to as a positive yield curve. YIELD-TO-MATURITY The rate of return yielded by a debt security held to maturity when both interest payments and the investor’s potential capital gain or loss are included in the calculation of return. ZERO-COUPON SECURITY A security that makes no periodic interest payments but instead is sold at a discount from its face value. RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1906, entitled "Protecting Children from Abuse and Neglect" (attached), and FORWARD to the County Administrator for response. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: On May 13, 2019, the 2018/19 Contra Costa County Civil Grand Jury filed the above referenced report. Per standard procedures, this action alerts the Board of Supervisors that the report has been received and directs the appropriate staff to review the report, provide the Board of Supervisors with an appropriate response, and forward that response to the Superior Court no later than August 11, 2019 (90 days). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: There is no immediate consequence. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Julia Taylor, 925.335.1043 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C.170 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1906: Protecting Children from Abuse and Neglect ATTACHMENTS Grand Jury Report No. 1906 FINDINGS F1. CFS has 23 vacant social worker positions. F2. CFS has an annual staff attrition rate of 28 percent. F3. CFS hiring practices take up to six months, during which time some job applicants find employment elsewhere. F4. EHSD has formed a task force to look for ways of speeding up the hiring process. F5. Compensation for CFS social workers is less than that for social workers in other Bay Area counties. F6. CFS staff cite high workloads, poor leadership, and a stressful work environment as reasons for leaving, in addition to compensation. F7. CFS does not have consistent practices for performance reviews to foster staff and management accountability. FB. EHSD has proposed incentives to encourage new hires to accept offers of employment. These include a five percent premium over base pay, signing bonuses, tuition reimbursement, and assistance with repayment of student loans. F9. EHSD has a Leadership Academy for all of its bureaus, but managers in CFS do not always participate or follow up with their staffs. F10. CFS does not have a clearly defined set of procedures for handling and resolving complaints it receives from parents and other stakeholders. F11. CFS has no formal process for handling recommendations from its ombudsman or staff members for improvements in its policies and practices. F12. The proposed contract for the new CFS ombudsman limits the amount of time the ombudsman can spend resolving complaints. F13. The independence of the CFS ombudsman is impacted because the position reports to the director of CFS. RECOMMENDATIONS R 1. The Board of Supervisors should consider directing EHSD to review social worker compensation to ensure that it is competitive with that of neighboring counties in the 2020~2021 budget cycle. Contra Costa County 2018-2019 Grand Jury Report 1906 Page 10 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjurv R2. The Board of Supervisors should consider implementing EHSD's proposal for incentives to aid in recruiting new social workers for CFS in the 2020-2021 budget cycle. · R3. The Board of Supervisors should consider directing EHSD to continue its ongoing efforts to streamline the hiring process and reduce the amount of time it takes to make hiring decisions by December 31, 2019 . R4 . The Board of SuperVisors should consider directing EHSD to hold CFS managers accountable for participating in its Leadership Development program by December 31, 2019. R5. The Board of Supervisors should consider directing EHSD to develop and implement a formal process for handling and resolving CFS client complaints by JL!ne 30, 2020. R6. The Board of Supervisors should consider directing EHSD to develop and implement procedures for evaluating recommendations by the CFS staff or ombudsman for improving policies and practices by June 30, 2020. R7. The Board of Supervisors should consider directing EHSD to require the ombudsman to report to the director of EHSD, rather than the director of CFS, by December 31, 2019. REQUIRED RESPONSES Findings Recommendations Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, F6, F7, F8, F9, F10, R6, and R7 F11, F12, and F13 These responses must be provided in the format and by the date set forth in the cover letter that accompanies this report. An electronic copy of these responses in the form of a Word document should be sent by e-mail to ctadmin@contracosta.courts.ca.gov and a hard (paper) copy should be sent to : Civil Grand Jury -Foreperson 725 Court Street P.O. Box431 Martinez, CA 94553-0091 Contra Costa County 2018-2019 Grand Jury Report 1906 Grand Jury Reports are posted at http://www.cc-courts.org/grandjurv Page 11 RECOMMENDATION(S): Accept the Industrial Safety Ordinance Annual Report submitted by the Health Services Department. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Chapter 450-8 of the County Ordinance Code known as the Industrial Safety Ordinance Risk Management Chapter requires Health Services to submit annual reports to the Board of Supervisors. The ordinance outlines what is to be included in this report. Attached is a copy of this report. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: A report that summarizes 2018 Industrial Safety Ordinance activities would not be made available for the public. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Randy Sawyer, 925-335-3210 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, cho nai cheung C.171 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Annual Industrial Safety Ordinance Report ATTACHMENTS 2018 Industrial Safety Ordinance Annual Performance Review and Evaluation Report INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ORDINANCE ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND EVALUATION REPORT -XQH , 2019 By Contra Costa Health Services Hazardous Materials Programs 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary .........................................................................................................................................................3 Public Participation ............................................................................................................................................3 Audits.....................................................................................................................................................................4 Major Chemical Accidents or Releases .........................................................................................................4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................5 Annual Performance Review and Evaluation Report ...............................................................................12 Effectiveness of Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs’ Implementation of the Industrial Safety Ordinance .......................................................................................................................................................................9 Effectiveness of the Procedures for Records Management...................................................................10 Number and Type of Audits and Inspections Conducted .......................................................................11 Number of Root Cause Analyses and/or Incident Investigations Conducted by Hazardous Materials Program ............................................................................................................................................12 Hazardous Materials Programs’ Process for Public Participation ........................................................13 Effectiveness of the Public Information Bank ...........................................................................................13 Effectiveness of the Hazardous Materials Ombudsperson ....................................................................14 Other Required Program Elements Necessary to Implement and Manage the Industrial Safety Ordinance ...........................................................................................................................................................14 Regulated Stationary Sources Listing ........................................................................................................................14 The Status of the Regulated Stationary Sources’ Safety Plans and Programs.....................................7 Locations of the Regulated Stationary Sources Safety Plans ..................................................................9 Annual Accident History Report and Inherently Safer Systems Implemented as Submitted by the Regulated Stationary Sources ........................................................................................................................15 Status of the Incident Investigations, Including the Root Cause Analyses Conducted by the Regulated Stationary Sources ........................................................................................................................16 Major Chemical Accidents or Releases .......................................................................................................18 Legal Enforcement Actions Initiated by Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs ..................20 Penalties Assessed as a Result of Enforcement ......................................................................................................20 Total Fees, Service Charges and Other Assessments Collected Specifically for the Industrial Safety Ordinance .....................................................................................................................................................................20 Total Personnel and Personnel Years Used by Hazardous Materials Program to Implement the Industrial Safety Ordinance ............................................................................................................................................................20 Comments from Interested Parties Regarding the Ef fectiveness of the Industrial Safety Ordinance ......21 The Impact of the Industrial Safety Ordinance on Improving Industrial Safety .............................................21 City of Richmond Industrial Safety Ordinance........................................................................................................23 3 Executive Summary In 1998, Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted a landmark Industrial Safety Ordinance requiring regulated facilities in the County to implement comprehensive safety programs. The requirements of the IndustrialSafetyOrdinance (ISO) aimed to prevent chemical accidents are some of the most stringent in the United States, if not the world.The goal is for facilities to implement safety programs, instill a safety culture and management systems that prevents incidents that could have detrimental impacts to the surrounding communities. In addition,ISO mandated participation from industries, agencies, elected officials and the public at large. Three major oil refineries and three chemical facilities are required to comply with the ISO requirements. Two facilities within the City of Richmond are required to comply with the same requirement as stated in the Richmond Industrial Safety Ordinance (RISO). Both ordinances are administered by Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs (CCHMP), a division of Contra Costa Health Services, the county health department. CCHMP is required to annually evaluate and report on the performance of the ISO to the Board of Supervisors. In the last two decades, there were Community Warning System (CWS) Level II and CWS Level III incidents that caused some concern;however,there is an overall observable trend of fewer and less severe incidents in the County. The ISO defines Major Chemical Accidents or Releases (MCAR) and there was only one MCAR incidents at an Industrial Safety Ordinance facility in this reporting period. CCHMP believes that any MCAR event serves as a reminder that implementation of mature prevention programs are challenging and all have to stay vigilant in ensuring continuous safe facility operations. CCHMP’s Accidental Release Prevention (ARP) Program engineers oversees the ISO and RISO. In 2014, the Board of Supervisors adopted amendments to the ISO as recommended by U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB). In an effort to improve the audit process, CCHMP staff piloted procedure walk downs and field verifications of Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&IDs) at the ISO facilities in 2015. These field activities have now been incorporated into audits at the ISO and other hazardous materials regulated facilities to further improve the thoroughness and completeness of the audit/inspections. CCHMP staff continues to work with other agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) and other local program agencies for sharing of incident results, regulatory interpretations, inspection results and training. CCHMP worked closely with Department of Industrial Relations, California Office of Emergency Services and California Environmental Protection Agency to develop new petroleum refinery safety regulations for the California Accidental Release PreventionProgram (Program 4) and the Process Safety Management requirement for Refineries. The two regulations were developed following the requirements of the ISO and were adopted into regulation in October 2017. CCHMP believes these new regulations will further improve safety programs at all California petroleum refineries as demonstrated here in Contra Costa County. CCHMP is also working closely with other Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA) in the development and implementation of these regulations for the Refineries. Public Participation Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs has an established public outreach process and is continually looking for ways to improve. The following community-engagement efforts took place in this reporting period: 4 • Public outreach information booths at existing venues –Both Phillips 66 Refinery and Air Liquide Large Industries’ Safety Plan and Safety Audits were shared at the: » Rodeo-Hercules Fire District Open House on November 18, 2018. » Sugartown Festival & Street Fair, on Crockett Blvd in Crockett, on July 15, 2018 • Tesoro Golden Eagle Refinery Safety Audit at National Night Out, Alhambra Christmas Tree Farm, Martinez, on August 7, 2018 • Answer questions and share information regarding the CalARP/ISO/RISO Programs » John Muir Birthday/Earth Day celebration at the John Muir National Historic Site in Martinez on April 21, 2018 • Presentations to Interested Groups –Both Phillips 66 Refinery and Air Liquide Large Industries’ Safety Plan and Safety Audits at the Crockett Community Center on August 16, 2018. –Presentation of the Safety Audit to the Phillips 66 Community Advisory Panel (CAP) on August 27, 2018 • Attend public meetings after major incidents: –There were no severity III incidents in this reporting period. • Most recent audit findings summarized in an easily read format in English and Spanish • Information on regulated businesses are presented in an easily read format in English and Spanish • Industrial Safety Ordinance Information Sheets are prepared in English and Spanish The Board of Supervisors also requested that staff provide copies of the Annual Report to communities through the Community Advisory Panels (CAP). This 2018 Annual Report is available on our website and will be sent to CAP representatives for distribution. Audits Audits of the regulated businesses are required at least once every three years to ensure that the facilities have the required programs in place and are implementing the programs. We completed three County ISO audits in 2018: • Air Products @ Shell—January 2018 • Air Products @ Tesoro—January 2018 • Shell Martinez Refinery—March 2018 Major Chemical Accidents or Releases There was one Major Chemical Accident or Release (MCAR) event for the County Industrial Safety Ordinance (ISO) facilities in July 2018 at the Shell Oil Refinery. Conclusion There is an overall declining trend for the severity of the Major Chemical Accidents or Releases in Contra Costa Countysince the implementation of the Industrial SafetyOrdinance with minor irregularities. The implementation of the Industrial Safety Ordinance has improved regulated facilities’ safety programs and operations. Additionally, CCHMP has sought assistance from stakeholders, including the regulated facilities, workers and community members to include the additional measures that was recommended by the CSB. These would further reduce likelihood of chemical accidents at these industrial facilities. 5 Introduction 1The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted the Industrial Safety Ordinance due to significant accidents that occurred at oil refineries and chemical plants in Contra Costa County in the 1990s. The effective date of the Industrial Safety Ordinance was January 15, 1999. The ordinance applies to oil refineries and chemical plants with specified North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes that were required to submit a Risk Management Plan to the U.S. EPA and are program level 3 stationary sources as defined by the U. S. EPA Risk Management Program. The ordinance specifies the following: • Stationary sources had one year to submit a Safety Plan to Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs (CCHMP) stating how the stationary source is complying with the ordinance, except the Human Factors portion (completed January 15, 2000) • CCHMP to develop a Human Factors Guidance Document (completed January 15, 2000) • Stationary sources had one year to comply with the requirements of the Human Factor Guidance Document that was developed by CCHMP (compliance date: January 15, 2000) • For Major Chemical Accidents or Releases, the stationary sources are required to perform a root cause analysis as part of their incident investigations (ongoing) • CCHMP may perform its own incident investigation, including a root cause analysis (ongoing) • All of the processes at the stationary source are covered as program level 3 or now for petroleum refineries program level 4 processes as defined by the California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP ) Program • The stationary sources are required to consider Inherently Safer Systems for new processes or facilities and for mitigations identified in a process hazard analysis • CCHMP reviewed all the submitted Safety Plans and audit/inspect all of the stationary sources’ Safety Programs within one year of the receipt of the Safety Plan (completed January 15, 2001) and every three years after the initial audit/inspection (ongoing) 1 6 Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs completed and issued the first Contra Costa County Safety Program Guidance Document on January 15, 2000. The stationary sources were required to comply with the Human Factors section of this guidance document by January 15, 2001. CCHMP performed a specialized audit for all the stationary sources for their Human Factors programs and for Inherently Safer Systems in 2002. The 2006 amendments to the Industrial Safety Ordinance require or expand the following: 1. Expand the Human Factors Program to include Maintenance 2. Expand the Management of Organizational Change to include Maintenance and all of Health and Safety positions 3. Require the stationary sources to perform Safety Culture Assessments one year after CCHMP develop guidance on performing a Safety Culture Assessment (completed November 2009) 4. Require the stationary sources to perform Security Vulnerability Analysis Hazardous Materials Programs staff has worked with the regulated facacilities to develop a Safety Culture Assessment Guidance Document, which was finalized and issued on November 10, 2009. Staff began reviewing these Safety Culture Assessments in December 2010. A revised SafetyProgram Guidance Document that reflects the ISO amendments, and additional clarifications based on the audit findings was issued in July 2011. In June 2014, the Board of Supervisors approved an amendment to the Industrial Safety Ordinance to address recommendations by CSB set forth in the Chevron refinery fire interim investigation report (August 2012) which further broadens the goals of the regulation by requiring the following: 1. Use of process safety performance indicators in the evaluation of the performance of process safety systems and to provide required contents in the annual performance review and evaluation report that is provided to the board of supervisors 2. Expand the implementation of inherently safer systems to be implemented to the greatest extent feasible and as soon as administratively practicable. Stationary source is now required to evaluate and document inherently safer system analysis: a. Every five years for existing covered processes, b. In the development and analysis of recommended action items identified in a process hazard analysis, c. As part of a management of change review, whenever a major change is proposed at a facility that could reasonably result in a major chemical accident or release, d. When an incident investigation report recommends a major change that could reasonably result in a major chemical accident or release, e. When a root cause analysis report recommends a major change that could reasonably result in a major chemical accident or release, and f. During the design of new processes, process units and facilities. 3. Conduct, document and complete a safeguard protection analysis for all processes by June 30, 2019, and every five years thereafter. 7 Regulated Stationary Sources Listing The six stationary sources now covered by the Industrial Safety Ordinance are: 1. Air Liquide Rodeo Hydrogen Plant at Phillips 66 2. Air Products at the Shell Martinez Refining Company 3. Air Products at the Tesoro Golden Eagle Refinery 4. Shell Martinez Refining Company 5. Phillips 66 Rodeo Refinery 6. Tesoro Golden Eagle Refinery The Air Liquide Rodeo Hydrogen Plant began operation in July 2009 and is located adjacent to the operating units on the refinery property. The facility produces purified hydrogen for Phillips 66 Refinery and other industrial customers. It also produces steam and electricity for the Phillips 66 Refinery. Two facilities are covered by Richmond’s ISO and they are: • Chevron Richmond Refinery • ChemtradeWest Richmond Works The Status of the Regulated Stationary Sources’ Safety Plans and Programs All stationary sources regulated by the Industrial Safety Ordinance were required to submit their Safety Plans to CCHMP by January 15, 2000 and to have their Safety Programs completed and implemented. The stationary sources were also required to have a Human Factors Program in place that follows the County’s Safety Program Guidance Document by January 15, 2001. The status of each of the regulated stationary sources is given in Table I and includes the following: • When the latest updated Safety Plan was submitted • When the Notice of Deficiencies was issued • When the plan was determined to be complete by Hazardous Materials Programs • When the public meeting was held on the Safety Plan • When the audits were complete • When the public meetings were held on the preliminary audit findings • When the Human Factors to the Safety Plan were revised • When the Notice of Deficiencies was issued for the Human Factors revised Safety Plan • When the Human Factors Safety Plan was determined to be complete • When the Audit/Inspection was completed • When the Human Factors Audit preliminary findings public meeting was held 8 Table I Industrial Safety Ordinance Stationary Source Status NAME Safety Plan (SP) Received Notice of Deficiencies (NOD) Issued-SP Safety Plan Complete SP Public Meeting Date Audit/ Inspection Audit Public Meeting Air Liquide Rodeo Hydrogen Plant 7/10/09 7/14/2010 11/3/2013 1/23/2017 12/13/2012 1/3/2013 3/1/2013 11/12/2013 7/21/2013 10/5/2013 10/14/2017 6/1/2010 5/28/2013 2/29/2016 10/8/11 10/5/2013 10/14/2017 Air Products— Shell & Tesoro 1/14/00 1/16/01 (HF update) 6/26/03 7/14/05 12/01/06 6/20/2008 6/30/2010 6/30/2014 12/1/17 6/15/00 5/10/01 (HF update) 8/24/07 3/14/2011 7/11/2014 8/30/00 6/19/01 (HF update) 9/14/07 7/1/2008 7/14/2014 9/13/00 5/8/03 9/23/07 6/19/2010 4/21/2012 4/15/2015 11/22/00 5/3/02 (HF) 2/27/04 1/22/07 7/20/09 4/16/2012 3/30/2015 1/11/2018 5/8/03 9/24/06 9/23/07 6/19/2010 4/20/2013 4/23/2015 4/23/2016 Phillips 66 (formerly ConocoPhillips) – Rodeo 1/15/00 1/12/01 (HF update) 8/10/05 8/7/09 8/7/2012 8/7/2015 8/6/2018 3/14/00 9/10/01 (HF update) 3/28/06 11/22/2010 6/5/2017 5/30/00 3/18/02 (HF update) 8/9/02 11/5/07 1/27/2011 7/3/2013 8/4/2017 6/15/00 5/9/02 10/7 & 10/13/07 10/8/2011 10/5/2013 7/21/2013 10/14/2017 6/30/00 11/5/01 (HF) 8/1/03 8/15/06 10/6/08 8/1/11 4/28/2014 1/4/2017 4/9/02 6/22/04 7/8/04 10/7 & 10/13/07 7/18/10, 10/9/10 10/8/11 7/21/2013 10/5/2013 10/24/2015 10/14/2017 Shell Martinez Refinery 1/14/00 1/16/01 (HF update) 7/22/02 1/11/06 9/3/2010 9/3/2013 8/26/2016 7/19/00 11/9/01 (HF update) 3/21/03 8/15/06 10/25/2011 4/9/01 1/3/02 (HF update) 9/15/03 11/2/06 3/27/2012 3/30/2017 5/8/03 9/24/06 9/23/07 4/21/2012 4/18/2015 4/22/2017 10/31/00 4/29/02 (HF) 11/26/04 10/23/06 4/30/09 2/13/2012 5/11/2015 2/28/2018 5/8/03 9/24/2006 9/23/07 6/19/2010 4/20/2013 4/23/2016 Tesoro Golden Eagle Refinery 1/14/00 1/12/01 (HF update) 6/21/02 6/22/07 12/11/09 6/1/2012 6/30/2015 6/13/2017 8/16/00 9/18/01 (HF update) 7/30/07 8/6/2012 1/31/01 12/14/01 (HF update) 6/21/03 11/5/07 6/4/10 8/27/2012 5/6/03 9/23/07 6/10/10 9/6/2012 4/22/2017 9/15/00 12/3/01 (HF) 9/8/03 11/07/05 8/18/08 4/18/2011 1/6/2014 10/5/2016 5/6/03 9/24/06 9/23/07 6/10/2010 9/6/2012 4/18/2015 8/7/2018 9 Locations of the Regulated Stationary Sources Safety Plans Each of the regulated stationary sources was required to submit a Safety Plan to Hazardous Materials Program on January 15, 2000 and an updated Safety Plan that includes the implementation of the stationary source’s Human Factors Program by January 15, 2001. The regulated stationary sources are required to update their Safety Plan at least once every three years. These plans are available for public review at the Hazardous Materials Programs Offices at 4585 Pacheco Blvd., Suite 100, Martinez. When Hazardous Materials Programs determines that the Safety Plan is complete, and prior to going out for a 45-day public comment period, Hazardous Materials Programs staff will place the plan in the library(ies) closest to the regulated stationary source so it is easily accessible for review by the general public. Table II lists the regulated stationary sources with the location of each Safety Plan. Table II Location of Safety Plans—Libraries Regulated Stationary Source Location 1 Location 2 Location 3 Air Liquide Large Industries Hazardous Materials Programs Office Rodeo Public Library Crockett Public Library Air Products at Shell Hazardous Materials Programs Office Martinez Public Library Air Products at Tesoro Hazardous Materials Programs Office Martinez Public Library Shell Refining-Martinez Hazardous Materials Programs Office Martinez Public Library Phillips 66 (formerly ConocoPhillips) Rodeo Refinery Hazardous Materials Programs Office Rodeo Public Library Crockett Public Library Tesoro Golden Eagle Refinery Hazardous Materials Programs Office Martinez Public Library Effectiveness of Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs’ Implementation of the Industrial Safety Ordinance Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs has developed policies, procedures, protocols and questionnaires to implement the California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program and the Industrial Safety Ordinance. The policies, procedures, protocols and questionnaires for these programs are listed below: • Audits/Inspections Policy • Conducting the Risk Management Plan/Safety Plan Completeness Review Protocol • Risk Management Plan Completeness Review Questionnaires • Safety Plan Completeness Review Questionnaires • Conducting Audits/Inspections Protocol • Safe Work Practices Questionnaires • CalARP Program Audit Questionnaires • Safety Program Audit Questionnaires • Conducting Employee Interviews Protocol • Employee Interview Questionnaires 10 • Procedure Field verification protocol • Piping and Instrumentation Diagram Field Verification protocol • Public Participation Policy • Dispute Resolution Policy • Reclassification Policy • Covered Process Modification Policy • CalARP Internal Performance Audit Policy • Conducting the Internal Performance Audit • CalARP Internal Audit Performance Audit Submission • Fee Policy • Notification Policy • Unannounced Inspection Policy • Risk Management Plan Public Review Policy Hazardous Materials Programs has developed the Contra Costa County CalARP Program Guidance Document and the Contra Costa County Safety Program Guidance Document (including the Safety Culture Assessment). An updated Contra Costa County Safety Program Guidance Document, which incorporated updates from the ISO amendments and additional clarifications from all the audits, was issued July 22, 2011, to the regulated facilities. These documents give guidance to the stationary sources for complying with the Industrial Safety Ordinance. The policies, procedures, protocols and questionnaires are available through Hazardous Materials Programs office. The guidance documents can be downloaded through Health Services’ website: http://cchealth.org/hazmat/calarp/guidance-document.php and http://cchealth.org/groups/hazmat/industrial_safety_ordinance_guidance.php Currently, CCHMP staff is working with the regulated facilities and labor representatives to revise the Safety Program Guidance Document to provide additional guidance and set expectations for compliance that incorporate the 2015 ISO amendment requirements. Effectiveness of the Procedures for Records Management Hazardous Materials Program has set up digital files for each stationary source. The files include the following folders: 1. Annual status reports 2. Audits & Inspections 3. Communications 4. Completeness Review 5. Emergency Response 6. Incident Investigation 7. Trade Secret Information Digital copies of the files are stored on the Hazardous Materials Programs network and are accessible to the Accidental Release Prevention Programs Engineers, Supervisor and the Environmental Health and Hazardous Materials Chief. Portable document format (PDF) versions of these files are also stored on the Hazardous Materials Programs network and available for public access and viewing at the office. The Accidental Release Prevention Program files contain regulations, policies, information from the U.S. EPA, the Governor’s Office of Emergency Services, the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazards Investigation Board, and other information pertinent to the engineers. The risk management and safety plans are received in hard copies, scanned and are kept at the Hazardous Materials Programs office. 11 Number and Type of Audits and Inspections Conducted The Hazardous Materials Programs staff was required to audit and inspect all stationary sources regulated under the Industrial Safety Ordinance within one year after the initial submittal of their Safety Plans. Hazardous Materials Programs reviewed all of the Safety Plans and audited/inspected all of the stationary sources’ Safety Programs within that year (2000). CCHMP performed focused audits of the stationary sources for their Human Factors Programs (this was not included in the original audit/inspection since the stationary sources were not required to have their Human Factors Program in place until January 2001) and Inherently Safer Systems in 2001 and 2002. Additional focused audits were performed to look at how two stationary sources would manage organizational change in case there was a strike and non-striking personnel were used instead of the striking personnel (2002). CCHMP completed the second round of audits for the Industrial Safety Ordinance stationary sources in 2003 and 2004 and began a third round of audits in the autumn of 2005, which were completed in the spring of 2007. The fourth round of audits was completed in August 2009. Air Liquide submitted a Risk Management Plan and Safety Plan to Hazardous Materials Program in July 2009 and was audited for the first time in June 2010 and subsequently in 2013 and 2016. CCHMP completed the fifth round of audits of ISO facilities in spring of 2012 and completed the sixth round of audits in summer of 2015. CCHMP started the seventh round of audits in fall of 2016 and completed the ISO facilities audits by March of 2018. In fall of 2019, CCHMP will begin the eigth round of audits at the ISO facilities When CCHMP ARP engineers review a Safety Plan, a Notice of Deficiencies is issued that documents what changes to a Safety Plan the stationary source is required to make before the Safety Plan is determined to be complete. The stationary source has 60 to 90 days to respond to the Notice of Deficiencies. When the stationary source has responded to this Notice of Deficiencies, the ARP engineer will review the responses. The ARP engineer will work with the stationary source until the Safety Plan contains the required information for it to be considered complete. When the Safety Plan is deemed complete, the ARP engineer will open a public comment period on the Safety Plan and will make the plan available in a public meeting or venue as well as at the public library closest to the stationary source. The ARP engineer will respond to all written comments in writing and, when appropriate, use the comments in upcoming audit/inspection of the regulated stationary sources. At the conclusion of a facility audit/inspection, an ARP engineer will issue a Preliminary Audit Findings report. The stationary source will have 90 days to respond to these findings. The ARP engineer will review the response from the stationary source regarding the findings from the audit. After the review and the ARP Engineer is in agreement with the action plan developed by the stationary source to come into compliance with the regulations, the ARP Engineer will issue the Preliminary Audit Findings for public comment and will make available the findings in a public meeting or venue as well as at the public library closest to the stationary source. The ARP engineer will consider any public comments that were received during the public comment period and if appropriate will revise the Preliminary Audit Findings. When this is complete, the ARP engineer will issue the Final Audit Findings and will respond in writing to any written public comments received. Table I lists the status of each stationary source’s Safety Plan, audit and inspections of their Safety Programs and the public meetings. 12 Number of Root Cause Analyses and/or Incident Investigations Conducted by Hazardous Materials Program CCHMP has not performed any root cause analyses or incident investigations in the past year. A historical listing of Major Chemical Accidents or Releases starting in 1992 is on the Health Services website at http://cchealth.org/groups/ hazmat/accident_history.php. This list includes major accidents that occurred prior to the adoption of the Industrial Safety Ordinance. Annual Performance Review and Evaluation Report The Industrial Safety Ordinance specifies that the contents of the annual performance review and evaluation report contain the following: • A brief description of how CCHMP is meeting the requirements of the ordinance as follows: –The program’s effectiveness in getting regulated businesses to comply with the ordinance –Effectiveness of the procedures for records management –Number and type of audits and inspections conducted by Hazardous Materials Programs as required by the ordinance –Number of root cause analyses and/or incident investigations conducted by Hazardous Materials Programs –Hazardous Materials Programs’ process for public participation –Effectiveness of the Public Information Bank –Effectiveness of the Hazardous Materials Ombudsperson –Other required program elements necessary to implement and manage the ordinance • A listing of stationary sources covered by the ordinance, including for each: –The status of the stationary source’s Safety Plan and Program –A summary of the stationary source’s Safety Plan updates and a listing of where the Safety Plans are publicly available –The annual accident history report submitted by the regulated stationary sources and required by the ordinance –A summary, including the status, of any root cause analyses and incident investigations conducted or being conducted by the stationary sources and required by the ordinance, including the status of implementation of recommendations –A summary, including the status, of any audits, inspections, root cause analyses and/or incident investigations conducted by Hazardous Materials Programs, including the status for implementing the recommendations –Description of Inherently Safer Systems implemented by the regulated stationary source –Legal enforcement actions initiated by Hazardous Materials Programs, including administrative, civil and criminal actions • Total fees, service charges and other assessments collected specifically for the support of the ordinance • Total personnel and personnel years used by the jurisdiction to directly implement or administer the ordinance • Comments that raise public safety issues from interested parties regarding the effectiveness of the local program • The impact of the ordinance in improving industrial safety 13 Hazardous Materials Programs’ Process for Public Participation In 2005, CCHMP worked with the community and developed materials that would describe the Industrial Safety Ordinance using a number of different approaches. The community representatives suggested that the Hazardous Materials Programs staff look at existing venues that are attended by the public. This will allow Hazardous Materials Programs staff to share and receive comments on the stationary source’s Safety Plans and Preliminary Audit Findings rather than asking the public to attend a special meeting. Additionally, based on Board recommendation in 2012, CCHMP are making presentations to Community Advisory Panel members and sharing the ISO annual reports. Effectiveness of the Public Information Bank The Hazardous Materials Programs section of Health Services website http://cchealth.org/groups/hazmat includes the following information: • Industrial Safety Ordinance –Description of covered facilities –Risk Management Chapter discussion » Copy of the ordinance –Land Use Permit Chapter discussion » Copy of the ordinance –Safety Program Guidance Document –Frequently Asked Questions –Public Outreach strategies • California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program –Contra Costa County’s California Accidental Release Prevention Program Guidance Document –Program Level description –Discussion on Public Participation for both CalARP Program and the Industrial Safety Ordinance –A map locating the facilities that are subject to the CalARP Program and are required to submit a Risk Management Plan to Hazardous Materials Program. The map links to a description of each of the facilities and the regulated substances handled –A link to the Office of Emergency Services (OES) website for the CalARP regulation • Hazardous Materials Inventories and Emergency Response Program –Descriptions –Forms • Underground Storage Tanks –Description of the program –Copies of the Underground Storage Tanks Health & Safety Code sections –Underground Storage Tanks forms • Green Business Program –Description of the Green Business Program with a link to the Association of Bay Area Government’s website on the Green Business Program • Hazardous Materials Incident Response Team –Including information of the Major Chemical Accidents or Releases that have occurred –The County’s Hazardous Materials Incident Notification Policy 14 • A link to the Phillips 66 and Chevron Fenceline Monitors • Unannounced Inspection Program –Lists the facilities that are subject to unannounced inspections under the Unannounced Inspection Program • Hazardous Materials Interagency Task Force –Includes a matrix of who has what hazardous materials and regulatory responsibilities –Minutes from past meetings –Presentations from past meetings • Incident Response – Accident history that lists summaries of major accidents from industrial facilities in Contra Costa County from 1992 to the most recent –Additional resource link s for more information • Incidents –Information on the July 6, 2018 Shell flaring incident, including the Root Cause report –Relevant 72-hours and 30-day incident report for MCAR events Effectiveness of the Hazardous Materials Ombudsperson The County Board of Supervisors created the Hazardous Materials Ombudsperson position in 1997. This position was filled in April 1998. The Board believed that the ombudsperson would be a conduit for the public to express their concerns about how Hazardous Materials Programs personnel are performing their duties. Attachment A is a report from the Hazardous Materials Ombudsperson on the effectiveness of the position for this reporting period. Other Required Program Elements Necessary to Implement and Manage the Industrial Safety Ordinance The California Accidental Release Prevention (CalARP) Program is administered in Contra Costa County by CCHMP. The Industrial Safety Ordinance expands on this program. Stationary sources are required to submit a Risk Management Plan that is similar to the Safety Plans that are submitted. An ARP engineer reviews these Risk Management Plans and performs the CalARP Program audit simultaneously with the Industrial Safety Ordinance audit. Hazardous Materials Program staff also performs unannounced inspections of CalARP program stationary sources that are also required to submit a Risk Management Plan to the U.S. EPA. These inspections aim to exercise how a facility will respond to an incident, including notifying emergency response agencies and CCHMP. 15 Annual Accident History Report and Inherently Safer Systems Implemented as Submitted by the Regulated Stationary Sources The Industrial Safety Ordinance requires the stationary sources to update the information on their accident history in their Safety Plans and include how they have used inherently safer processes within the last year. Table III summarizes Inherently Safer Systems that have been implemented by the different stationary sources during the same period. Attachment B includes the individual reports from the stationary sources that also includes the required reporting of four common process safety performance indicators. 16 Table III Inherently Safer Systems Contra Costa County Facilities Regulated Stationary Source Inherently Safer System Implemented Design Strategy Approach Air Liquide Large Industries No new inherently safer systems have been implemented; project in progress for 2019 Air Products at Shell No new inherently safer systems have been implemented Air Products at Tesoro No new inherently safer systems have been implemented Phillips 66 (formerly ConocoPhillips) —Rodeo Refinery Reduced inventory by changing equipment in proces Inherent Moderate Reduced potential of exposure by changing layout or design, equipment (6 times) Passive Moderate Reduced potential unit upset by changing equipment or adding alarms (7 times) Active Moderate Reduced potential of exposure by changing equipment layout or design Active Simplify Reduced potential of error by adding administrative controls such as locks (2 times) Shell Martinez Refinery Eliminated equipment from process Inherent Minimize Reduced potential of exposure by changing design, equipment metallurgy (12 times) Passive Moderate Simplified unit design and chemical by changing/re- routing equipment (4 times) Active Moderate Reduced potential of error in procedure Procedural Moderate Reduced potential of error by changing service in procedure Procedural Simplify Reduced potential of error by changing equipment function Procedural Minimize Tesoro Golden Eagle Refinery Reduced potential of the hazardous condition by equipment design features (3 times) Passive Moderate Status of the Incident Investigations, Including the Root Cause Analyses Conducted by the Regulated Stationary Sources The Industrial Safety Ordinance requires the regulated stationary sources to do an incident investigation with a root cause analysis for each of the major chemical accidents or releases as defined by the following: “Major Chemical Accident or Release” means an incident that meets the definition of a Level 3 or Level 2 incident in the Community Warning System incident level classification system defined in the Hazardous Materials Incident Notification Policy, as determined by Contra Costa Health Services; or results in the release of a regulated substance and meets one or more of the following criteria: • Results in one or more fatalities 17 • Results in greater than 24 hours of hospital treatment of three or more persons • Causes on–and/or off-site property damage (including cleanup and restoration activities) initially estimated at $500,000 or more. On-site estimates shall be performed by the regulated stationary source. Off-site estimates shall be performed by appropriate agencies and compiled by Health Services • Results in a vapor cloud of flammables and/or combustibles that is more than 5,000 pounds The regulated stationary source is required to submit a report to Hazardous Materials Programs 30 days after the root cause analysis is complete. There was one Major Chemical Accidents or Releases that occurred within this reporting period in Contra Costa County at an ISO facilities. The Shell Martinez Refinery released unburned flare gas from an elevated flare on July 6, 2018 which resulted in flaring and CWS 2 activation. The status of this incident investigation is listed in Table IV below. This and other final RCA reports for previous MCAR incident reports are available at the Hazardous Materials Programs office and website. Table IV MCAR Status Facility MCAR Date CWS Severity MCAR Description Onsite Impact Offsite Impact Shell Martinez Refinery– LOP flaring 7/6/2018 1 Two separate events on this day. 1) 1:00am-Drop in pressure of refinery instrument air resulted in flaring and extinguishing of LOP flare pilots 2) 2:20am-Small lube oil fire in Hydrocracker Unit forced shutdown of unit. At 3:20am, Hydrocracker de- pressured to LOP Flare and flare pilots remained unlit. By 3:45am Hydrocracker depressurization stopped, and flaring stopped. Flare pilots were relit by 8:45am. Small fire resulted in unit shutdown that sent material to LOP Flare and flare pilots were unlit. HAZMAT personnel in field report slight to no odors in area. Only one field detection of H2S was 0.001 ppm at Shell Ave and Marina Vista. Major Chemical Accidents or Releases Hazardous Materials Programs analyzed the Major Chemical Accidents or Releases (MCAR) that occurred since the implementation of the Industrial Safety Ordinance. The analysis includes the number of MCARs and the severity of the MCARs. Three different levels of severity were assigned: • Severity Level III—A fatality, serious injuries or major on-site and/or off-site damage occurred • Severity Level II—An impact to the community occurred, or if the situation was slightly different the accident may have been considered major, or there is a recurring type of incident at that facility • Severity Level I—A release where there was no or minor injuries, the release had no or slight impact to the community, or there was no or minor onsite damage Below are charts showing the number of MCARs from January 1999 through October 2017 for all stationary sources in Contra Costa County, the MCARs that occurred at stationary sources regulated by the County’s Industrial Safety Ordinance, and a chart showing the MCARs that have occurred at the County and the City of Richmond’s Industrial Safety Ordinance stationary sources. NOTE: The charts do not include any transportation MCARs that have occurred. 18 19 A weighted score has been developed giving more weight to the higher severity incidents and a lower weight to the less severe incidents. The purpose is to develop a metric of the overall process safety of facilities in the County, the facilities that are covered by the County and the City of Richmond Industrial Safety Ordinances, and the facilities that are covered by the County’s Industrial Safety Ordinance. A severity level III incident is given 9 points, severity level II is given 3 points and severity level I is given 1 point. Below is a graph of this weighted scoring. 20 Legal Enforcement Actions Initiated by Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs As part of the enforcement of the Industrial Safety Ordinance and the CalARP Program, Hazardous Materials Programs staff issue, Notices of Deficiencies on the Safety and Risk Management Plans and issues Audit Findings on what a stationary source is required to change to come into compliance with the regulations. Table I shows the action that has been taken by Hazardous Materials Programs. Hazardous Materials Programs staff has not taken any action through the District Attorney’s Office for noncompliance with the requirements of the Industrial Safety Ordinance. Penalties Assessed as a Result of Enforcement No penalties have been assessed in this period for noncompliance with the Industrial Safety Ordinance. Total Fees, Service Charges and Other Assessments Collected Specifically for the Industrial Safety Ordinance The fees charged for the Industrial Safety Ordinance are to cover the time that the ARP engineers use to enforce the ordinance, the position of the Hazardous Materials Ombudsperson, outreach material and to cover a portion of the overhead for the Hazardous Materials Programs. The fees charged for administering this ordinance for the past fiscal year 2017–2018 $578,390. Total Personnel and Personnel Years Used by Hazardous Materials Program to Implement the Industrial Safety Ordinance The ARP engineers have reviewed resubmitted Safety Plans, prepared and presented information for public meetings, performed audits of the stationary sources for compliance with both the California Accidental Release Prevention Program and Industrial Safety Ordinance and did follow-up work after a Major Chemical Accident or Release. The following is a breakdown of the time that was spent on the County’s and the City of Richmond’s Industrial Safety Ordinances: • Three ISO/CalARP Program facility audits were performed in 2018. It takes four to five engineers four weeks to perform the on-site portion of an ISO/CalARP Program audit. The audit process encompasses off-site time that includes report preparation, a quality assurance review process, working with the facility to address any questions and assessing the facility’s proposed remedies for completeness, preparing communication materials and posting public notices, attending a public forum to share audit findings, addressing any questions from the public and issuing the final report. The total time taken to perform these audits each year was 3,600 hours. Approximately one-third of the time was dedicated to the Industrial Safety Ordinance, for a total of 1, 200 hours. This year larger teams included recently hired ARP engineers, as part of their training, participated in the ISO audits for a total of 850 additional hours. • Reviewing information for the website—180 hours • Reviewing Safety Plans and following up with the facilities on any deficiencies—650 hours • Review and participate in investigation, root cause analysis and proposed recommendations—500 hours • Prepare material for presentations and public meetings – total approximately 450 personnel hours. • Total of 3,828 hours is the approximate personnel time spent on the Industrial Safety Ordinance. This is not including the Ombudsperson time spent helping prepare for the public meetings, working with the engineers on questions arising from the Industrial Safety Ordinance, and answering questions from the public on the Industrial Safety Ordinance. 21 In 2015 and 2016, CCHMP worked with the ISO-working group which included regulated facilities, employee and community representatives to address changes in the Safety Plan Guidance document to accommodate recommendations from CSB. Additionally, CCHMP worked extensively with both the Department of Industrial Relations and CalEPA on improved Safety regulations for refineries in California as a result of the Governor’s Intra-Agency Task Force Report. Comments from Interested Parties Regarding the Effectiveness of the Industrial Safety Ordinance No comments were received on the County’s or the City of Richmond’s Industrial Safety Ordinances during the last year. The Impact of the Industrial Safety Ordinance on Improving Industrial Safety Four programs are in place to reduce the potential of an accidental release from a regulated stationary source that could impact the surrounding community. The four programs are the Process Safety Management Program administered by Cal/OSHA, the federal Accidental Release Prevention Program administered by the U.S. EPA, the California Accidental Release Prevention Program administered locally by CCHMP, and the Industrial Safety Ordinance, which is also administered by CCHMP. Each of the programs is very similar in requirements. On October 1, 2017, California petroleum refineries are required to comply with requirements of CalARP Program 4 and OSHA PSM for refineries. Both are based on the ISO. CalARP Program 3 differs from the Federal Accidental Release Prevention Program in the following ways: • The number of chemicals regulated • The threshold quantity of these chemicals • An external events analysis, including seismic and security and vulnerability analysis, is required • Additional information in the Risk Management Plan • CCHMP is required to audit and inspect stationary sources at least once every three years • The interaction required between the stationary source and CCHMP The ISO differs from CalARP Program 3, which the chemical facilities are required to follow, in the following ways: • Stationary sources are required to include a root cause analysis with the incident investigations for Major Chemical Accidents or Releases • The stationary sources are required to consider inherently safer systems for existing processes, in the development and analysis of recommended action items identified in a process hazard analysis, as part of a management of change review, as part of incident investigation or root cause analysis development of recommendation, and during the design of new processes, process units and facilities. • All of the processes at the regulated stationary sources are covered • The implementation of a Human Factors Program evaluation of latent conditions in existing units, operating and maintenance procedures and in root cause analysis • Managing changes in the organization for operations, maintenance and emergency response • A requirement that the stationary sources perform a Security and Vulnerability Analysis and test the effectiveness of the changes made as a result of the Security and Vulnerability Analysis • The stationary sources perform Safety Culture Assessments • Conduct, document and complete safeguard protection analysis for process hazard analysis to reduce catastrophic releases • Use and report of process safety performance indicators in the annual performance review and evaluation report 22 Major Program difference of ISO from CalARP Program 4 and PSM for Refineries is that the Program 4 requirements include: • Mechanical Integrity must include assessment of Damage Mechanism Review base on operating history and industry experience • Process Hazard Analysis must include review of Damage Mechanism Review report compiled as part of process safety information • Contractor and any subcontractors use a skilled and trained workforce pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 25536.7 • Require a Management system with specific requirement for managing and communicating recommendations from the prevention program elements • Require a Stop Work procedure and an anonymous hazard reporting system The Safety Culture Assessment guidance chapter was finalized in November 2009. The Industrial Safety Ordinance Guidance Document was updated to reflect all the updates in September 2010. The Accidental Release Prevention Engineers have participated with the Center for Chemical Process Safety on developing the second edition of Inherently Safer Chemical Processes, a book that is referenced in the ordinance and with the Center for Chemical Process Safety on developing process safety metrics for leading and lagging indicators. CCHMP is currently participating in the third edition of CCPS: Inherently Safer Chemical Processes to further clarify and promote the practice and consideration of Inherently Safer System. All of these requirements have lowered the probability of an accident occurring. Contra Costa County was recognized as an alternative model for doing process-safety inspections by the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board in its report on a 2005 refinery accident in Texas City. The report states, “Contra Costa County and the U.K. Health and Safety Executive conduct frequent scheduled inspections of PSM and major hazard facilities with highly qualified staff.” This was done to compare to the number of OSHA process safety management audits. The Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board also mentions Contra Costa County in a DVD, Anatomy of a Disaster: Explosion at BP Texas City Refinery, on the resources given to audit and ensure facilities are complying with regulations. Carolyn W. Merritt, the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board Chair at that time, also recognized Contra Costa County in testimony to the House of Representatives Committee on Education and Labor chaired by U.S. Rep. George Miller. Senator Barbara Boxer, during a 2007 hearing to consider John Bresland’s nomination to the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board as the Chair (replacing Carolyn Merritt), asked Mr. Bresland about the Contra Costa County program for process safety audits of refineries and chemical companies. In its final investigation report on an incident that occurred in 2008 at the Bayer Crop Science, Institute, West Virginia, the CSB recommended that regulatory agencies in the area audit their chemical facilities using Contra Costa County’s auditing process. CCHMP staff and a representative from the local United Steelworkers Union were part of a panel when the Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board presented this report to the Kanawha Valley community. Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs in June 2010 was asked to give testimony at the hearing on “Work Place Safety and Worker Protections in the Gas and Oil Industry” before the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Subcommittee on Employment and Workplace Safety. The testimony was on the success of the Accidental Release Prevention Programs that are in place in Contra Costa County. The hearing was specific on two 23 major incidents that occurred one in Anacortes, WA. at a Tesoro Refinery and the other, Deepwater Horizon incident in the Gulf of Mexico. A link to the testimony is posted on the Health Services website (http://www.help.senate.gov/ hearings/production-over-protections-a-review-of-process-safety-management-in-the-oil-and-gas-industry) and the written testimony can be found at http://www.help.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Sawyer.pdf? In September 2012, Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Programs was asked to be a presenter at the “Expert Forum on the Use of Performance-based Regulatory Models in the U.S. Oil and Gas Industry: Offshore and Onshore” in Texas City, Texas to share the regulatory experience at Contra Costa County. And give testimony on how local, state and Federal agencies can work together and have an unprecedented alignment on regulations that is required for the same facilities. This informational meeting was spearheaded by Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration and attended by Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, United States Coast Guard, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, United Steelworkers, American Petroleum Institute, academia and industry representatives. CCHMP staff also testified at a hearing on “Oversight of Federal Risk Management and Emergency Planning Programs to Prevent and Address Chemical Threats, Including the Events Leading up to the Explosions in West, TX and Geismar, LA”; before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, June 27, 2013. Following is a link to the transcript of the hearing: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CHRG-113shrg95874/pdf/CHRG-113shrg95874.pdf City of Richmond Industrial Safety Ordinance The City of Richmond on December 18, 2001 passed its version of the Industrial Safety Ordinance, which became effective January 17, 2002. Richmond’s Industrial Safety Ordinance (RISO) mirrors the County’s Industrial Safety Ordinance. Richmond’s Industrial Safety Ordinance covers two stationary sources: Chevron Richmond Refinery and General Chemical West Richmond Works. CCHMP administers the Richmond ISO for the City. West Richmond, Chemtrade (formerly General Chemical) and Chevron submitted their Safety Plans to Hazardous Materials Programs in 2003, which have been reviewed and were considered complete. The public comment period for these plans ended in January 2004. Public meetings held in 2004 in North Richmond and Richmond discussed Chevron and Chemtrade West Richmond (Chemtrade) audit findings. The second Richmond Industrial Safety Ordinance/CalARP Program audits for these facilities occurred in 2006 and public meetings were held in June 2007 at Hilltop Mall at “Lessons from Katrina,” the 2007 Neighbor Works Week Homeownership Faire & Disaster Preparedness Expo. CCHMP followed up on the January 15, 2007 fire at the Chevron Refinery. The follow-up included a public meeting, City Council meetings, meetings with Chevron on the investigation and the root cause analysis. Chevron Richmond Refinery was audited for the third time for RISO/CalARP program in April 2008. The report was finalized and results were available at the Recycle More Earth Day Event in Richmond in June 2009. Copies of the audit results are available at the Richmond Library and a summary of the audit is also available on Hazardous Materials Programs’ website. CCHMP performed an RISO/CalARP program audit at General Chemical Richmond in January 2009, January 2012 and in September 2014. CCHMP performed the RISO/CalARP program audit at Chevron Richmond Refinery in April 2008, February 2011, and October 2013. CCHMP also made presentation to Point Richmond Neighborhood Council at the Point Richmond Firehouse about General Chemical Richmond Works and Chevron Richmond Refinery’s audit history, incidents and general Industrial Safety Ordinance information on January 25, 2012. The 2013 final audit report for Chevron and the 2014 final audit report for Chemtrade Richmond was shared on Food Day in Richmond in October 2015. The sixth RISO/CalARP audit at Chevron was completed in August 2016 and in July 2017 for Chemtrade Richmond. The detail status and location of the Safety plan and audits is listed in Table V. CCHMP will begin the seventh RISO/ CalARP audit at Chevron this coming June. 24 Name/ Location of copies Safety Plan (SP) Received Notice of Deficiencies (NOD) Issued-SP Safety Plan Complete SP Public Meeting Date Audit/ Inspection Audit Public Meeting Chevron Richmond/ Point Richmond and Richmond Main Public Library 1/21/03 6/21/04 9/29/06 9/25/09 9/24/12 9/30/15 6/28/18 4/23/03 11/8/12 10/10/03 6/22/04 5/21/07 11/4/09 11/12/13 7/25/18 10/14/03 6/24/04 6/2/07 9/25/10 10/5/13 1/11/01 (Non- RISO) 9/29/03 2/13/06 4/14/08 2/8/11 10/3/13 7/18/16 6/24/04 6/2/07 4/25/09 9/24/11 10/24/15 Chemtrade Richmond Works/Point Richmond and Richmond Main Public Library 1/17/03 6/21/04 4/17/09 8/5/14 11/26/18 4/11/03 2/18/10 7/10/15 10/10/03 4/17/06 5/26/10 10/14/03 6/2/07 9/25/10 5/1/16 5/29/01 (Non-RISO) 4/24/06 8/18/03 1/5/09 1/5/12 9/8/14 7/17/17 6/24/04 6/2/07 9/25/10 10/5/13 10/24/15 CCHMP worked with U.S. EPA, Cal OSHA, BAAQMD and CSB’s in their independent investigation of the August 6, 2012 fire at the No. 4 Crude Unit Chevron. CCHMP co-hosted two public meetings in conjunction with the City of Richmond to share information regarding this severity level III incident. CCHMP, City of Richmond and representatives of the agencies performing the investigation shared preliminary results and addressed public issues and concerns. Written comments were gathered and are posted on the Health Services’ website. CCHMP hired a third party to perform a safety evaluation of the Chevron Richmond Refinery after the August 6, 2012 fire. The evaluation reviewed the safety culture of the refinery, the process safety management systems, and human factors. The final report is complete and is posted on the county’s website. CCHMP staff worked closely with the City of Richmond staff in preparation of the Richmond Industrial Safety Ordinance amendment (adopted in Jan 2013) that made the Richmond Industrial Safety Ordinance consistent with the Contra Costa County Industrial Safety Ordinance (with the amendments). In 2014, CCHMP again worked with the City of Richmond staff to amend the Richmond Industrial Safety Ordinance and the County Industrial Safety Ordinance aimed to address recommendations by the US Chemical Safety and Investigation Board following the August 6, 2012 Chevron fire to further improve process safety operations in Contra Costa County refineries and chemical facilities. CCHMP presented the 2014 annual RISO report to the Richmond City Council on April 28, 2015. Copies of the 2014 RISO report were submitted to the Richmond City Council and posted on cchealth.org. Select community members/ organizations were also included in the distribution. CCHMP received annual performance update from Chevron and Chemtrade in June 2017. The complete annual status is included as Attachment C. A summary of Inherently Safer Systems from both facilities are summarized in Table V below. Table V Richmond Industrial Safety Ordinance Stationary Source Status 25 Inherently Safer Systems Richmond Facilities Regulated Stationary source Inherently Safer System Implemented Design Strategy Approach Chevron Reduce the inventory of hazardous substance by eliminating piping and equipment (2 times) Inherent Minimization Eliminated equipment from process Inherent Simplify Reduced potential of exposure and hazard by simplifying equipment design Passive Simplify Reduced potential of exposure and hazard by metallurgy upgrade and equipment design Passive Moderate Reduced potential of error simplification of steps to include duration Procedural Simplify Chemtrade Richmond Works Reduced potential of exposure and hazard by metallurgy upgrade and equipment design (2 times) Passive Moderate 26 ATTACHMENT A HAZARDOUS MATERIALS OMBUDSMAN REPORT Hazardous Materials Ombudsperson Evaluation NOVEMBER 2017 THROUGH OCTOBER 2018 27 I. INTRODUCTION On July 15, 1997 the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors authorized creation of an Ombudsman position for the County’s Hazardous Materials Programs. The first Hazardous Materials Ombudsman began work on May 1, 1998. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors adopted an Industrial Safety Ordinance on December 15, 1998. Section 450-8.022 of the Industrial Safety Ordinance requires the Health Services Department to continue to employ an Ombudsman for the Hazardous Materials Programs. Section 450-8.030(B)(vii) of the Industrial Safety Ordinance requires an annual evaluation of the effectiveness of the Hazardous Materials Ombudsman, with the first evaluation to be completed on or before October 31, 2000. The goals of section 450-8.022 of the Industrial Safety Ordinance for the Hazardous Materials Ombudsman are: 1. To serve as a single point of contact for people who live or work in Contra Costa County regarding environmental health concerns, and questions and complaints about the Hazardous Materials Programs. 2. To investigate concerns and complaints, facilitate their resolution, and assist people in gathering information about programs, procedures, or issues. 3. To provide technical assistance to the public. The Hazardous Materials Ombudsman currently accomplishes these goals through the following program elements: 1. Continuing an outreach strategy so that the people who live and work in Contra Costa County can know about and utilize the program. 2. Investigating and responding to questions and complaints, and assisting people in gathering information about programs, procedures, or issues. 3. Participating in a network of environmental programs for the purpose of providing technical assistance. This evaluation covers the period from November 2017 through October 2018 for the Hazardous Materials Ombudsman program. The effectiveness of the program shall be demonstrated by showing that the activities of the Hazardous Materials Ombudsman meet the goals established in the Industrial Safety Ordinance. II. PROGRAM ELEMENTS 1. Continuing an Outreach Strategy This period efforts were focused on maintaining the outreach tools currently available. The web page was maintained for the program as part of Contra Costa Health Services web site. This page contains information about the program, links to other related web sites, and information about upcoming meetings and events. A toll-free phone number is published in all three Contra Costa County phone books in the Government section. 28 2. Investigating and Responding to Questions and Complaints, and Assisting in Information Gathering During this period, the Hazardous Materials Ombudsman received 124 information requests. Over 95 percent of these requests occurred via the telephone, and have been requests for information about environmental issues. Requests via e-mail are slowly increasing, mainly through referrals from Health Services main web page. Most of these requests concern problems around the home such as asbestos removal, household hazardous waste disposal, pesticide misuse, mold and lead contamination. Information requests about environmental issues received via the telephone were generally responded to within one business day of being received. Many of the information requests were answered during the initial call. Some requests required the collection of information or written materials that often took several days to compile. Telephone requests were responded to by telephone unless written materials needed to be sent as part of the response. This year the Ombudsman facilitated two public meetings – one concerning the results of the Industrial Safety Ordinance Safety Audit of the Philips 66 refinery, and the other about the investigation of potential radiation contamination at the Keller Canyon Landfill. 3. Participating in a Network of Environmental Programs for the Purpose of Providing Technical Assistance. Technical assistance means helping the public understand the regulatory, scientific, political, and legal aspects of issues. It also means helping them understand how to effectively communicate their concerns within these different arenas. This year, the Ombudsman continued to staff a number of County programs and participate in other programs to be able to provide technical assistance to the participants and the public. • CAER (Community Awareness and Emergency Response)—This non-profit organization addresses industrial accident prevention, response and communication. The Ombudsman participated in the Emergency Notification subcommittee of CAER. • Hazardous Materials Commission—In 2001, the Ombudsman took over as staff for the Commission. As staff to the Commission, the Ombudsman conducts research, prepares reports, drafts letters and provides support for 3 monthly Commission meetings. During this period the Commission sent letters to the Board of Supervisors concerning school siting issues and the US Chemical Safety Board, investigated hazardous materials issues at three sites in the County and provided feedback on a fact sheet about hazardous materials usage being prepared by a local environmental organization. In addition, during this period the Ombudsman represented the Commission at meetings of the Contra Costa County Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention Task Force and the Northern Waterfront Economic Development Initiative. The Ombudsman also reached out to local Chambers of Commerce to assess their interest in promoting a workshop for local businesses on cybersecurity. The Ombudsman also assisted the Alamo Improvement Association in implementing a Federal Department of Transportation Grant to conduct three public workshops about pipeline safety issues. 29 • Integrated Pest Management Advisory Committee—During this period the Ombudsman represented the Health Department on the County Integrated Pest Management Advisory Committee. This Committee brings Department representatives and members of the public together to help implement the County’s Integrated Pest Management policy. The Ombudsman served on the outreach committee and helped prepare articles about pest management for publication in local newspapers. • Asthma Program—The Ombudsman participated in the Public Health Department’s Asthma Program as a resource on environmental health issues. The Ombudsman represented the Asthma Program in two regional collaboratives related to asthma issues, particularly diesel pollution —the Ditching Dirty Diesel Collaborative and the Bay Area Environmental Health Collaborative. The Ombudsman served on the Technical Advisory Board for RAMP, the Regional Asthma Management Prevention program. The Ombudsman also provided technical assistance to a quality improvement program for families with asthma being conducted by the Contra Costa Health Plan and a scientific research project being conducted by the University of California on asthma in West County. The Ombudsman provided two presentations to after-school High School programs about air pollution and asthma. The Ombudsman also applied for a Technical Assistance grant with MCE, the new energy provider for 14 of the 19 jurisdictions in Contra Costa County, to develop a business plan for addressing in-home asthma triggers. • Climate Change During this period the Ombudsman completed a pilot project with the Public Health Nursing program to help their clients apply to the County’s Weatherization program. The Ombudsman, together with the Energy Efficiency Program in the Department of Conservation and Development, hired a Civic Spark intern to expand this effort to 15 other programs in CCHS and EHSD. The Ombudsman coordinated the effort to develop an Excessive Heat Response Plan for Contra Costa Health Services. The Ombudsman also represented the Public Health Department in regional and state efforts to address the impacts of Climate Change, including a Bay Conservation and Development Commission-led effort to address sea level rise issues in Contra Costa County and regionally, the Bay Area Regional Health Inequities Initiative’s Built Environment committee which addresses climate change, the Contra Costa Sustainability Exchange and the California Department of Public Health Climate Change Community of Learning. • Bay Delta Stakeholder Advisory Group for Contaminated Fish Consumption The Ombudsman served on the California Department of Public Health’s Bay Delta Stakeholder Advisory Group for Contaminated Fish Consumption. This is a two year effort to develop updated and effective public messaging for the new fish consumption advisories for the Bay Delta that have been developed by the State. The Hazardous Materials Ombudsman also attended workshops, presentations, meetings and trainings on a variety of environmental issues to be better able to provide technical assistance to the public. Topics included Environmental Justice, Air Quality, emergency management, energy policy and land-use planning for greenhouse gas reduction. III. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT The Hazardous Material Ombudsman continued to report to the Public Health Director on a day-to-day basis during this period, while still handling complaints and recommendations about the Hazardous Materials Programs through the Health Services Director. The Ombudsman was also a member of Health Services Emergency Management Team (EMT), participated in EMT trainings and drills, and participated on its HEEP management team. 30 IV. GOALS FOR THE 2018-2019 PERIOD In this period, the Ombudsman will provide essentially the same services to Contra Costa residents as was provided in the last period. The Ombudsman will continue respond to questions and complaints about the actions of the Hazardous Materials Programs; answer general questions that come from the public and assist them in understanding regulatory programs; staff the Hazardous Materials Commission; represent the Public Health Department on the Ditching Dirty Diesel Collaborative, the Bay Area Regional Health Inequities Initiative, the Bay Area Environmental Health Collaborative, the Integrated Pest Management Advisory Committee, and participate in the CAER Emergency Notification committee. The Ombudsman will represent the Hazardous Materials Commission in the Northern Shoreline Economic Development Initiative. The Ombudsman will continue to be part of the Health Department’s HEEP team and be part of the Emergency Management Team. During this period the Ombudsman will continue to work with the Public Health Department on Climate Change issues by expanding the pilot weatherization program with the Public Health Nurses to other programs, being on the County- wide work group updating the Climate Action Plan, and by providing input on the BCDC East County ART project and regional ART project. The Ombudsman will continue to work with collaboratives at the local, regional and state level. If the Health Department is successful in receiving the Technical Assistance grant to develop a business plan for addressing in-home asthma triggers the Ombudsman will take a lead role in implementing the grant. 31 32 2018–19 ATTACHMENT B COUNTY REGULATED SOURCES ANNUAL PERFORMANCE With accident history and inherent safety implementation 33 Annual Performance Review and Evaluation Submittal October 1, 2018 *Attach additional pages as necessary 1. Name and address of Stationary Source: Air Liquide Rodeo Hydrogen Plant, 1391 San Pablo Ave., Rodeo, California 94572 2. Contact name and telephone number (should CCHMP have questions): Dave Steffens (510) 245- 7285 x-2204 3. Summarize the status of the Stationary Source’s Safety Plan and Program (450-8.030(B)(2)(i)): Improvements in the Rodeo site safety program continue as recommendations from CCC ISO and internal Air Liquide audits are incorporated.. 4. Summarize Safety Plan updates (i.e., brief explanation of update and corresponding date) (450-8.030(B)(2)(ii)): No revisions to the Safety Plan have been submitted, but changes to internal Air Liquide processes merit a revision. Next scheduled revision due date is 1/27/2020. 5. List of locations where Safety Plans are/will be available for review, including contact telephone numbers if the source will provide individuals with copies of the document (450- 8.030(B)(2)(ii)): CCHMP Office at 4585 Pacheco Boulevard, Suite 100, Martinez; Crockett and Rodeo Libraries (libraries closest to the stationary source). 6. Provide any additions to the annual accident history reports (i.e. updates) submitted pursuant to Section 450-8.016(E)(2) of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2)(iii)) (i.e., provide information identified in Section 450-8.016(E)(1) for all major chemical accidents or releases occurring between the last annual performance review report and the current annual performance review and evaluation submittal (12-month history)): There were no major chemical accidents or releases during the past 12 months. 7. Summary of each Root Cause Analysis (Section 450-8.016(C)) including the status of the analysis and the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during the analysis (450-8.030(B)(2)(iv)): There were no Root Cause Analyses performed specific to major chemical accidents or releases during the last 12 months. 8. Summary of the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during audits, inspections, Root Cause Analyses, or Incident Investigations conducted by the Department (450-8.030(B)(2)(v)): Rodeo site personnel with assistance from Air Liquide continue to work on incorporating NOD’s from the last CCC ISO audit. In addition, we continue to incorporate other action items/recommendations resulting from internal Air Liquide process safety audits. 9. Summary of inherently safer systems implemented by the source including but not limited to inventory reduction (i.e., intensification) and substitution (450-8.030(B)(2)(vi)): ISS review was completed on the Transfer Line Replacement project scheduled for installation during the November, 2019 TAR. 34 10. Summarize the enforcement actions (including Notice of Deficiencies, Audit Reports, and any actions turned over to the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office) taken with the Stationary Source pursuant to Section 450-8.028 of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2) (vii)): There were no enforcement actions during this period. 11. Summarize total penalties assessed as a result of enforcement of this Chapter (450-8.030(3)): No penalties have been assessed against this facility. 12. Summarize the total fees, service charges, and other assessments collected specifically for the support of the ISO (450-8.030(B)(4)): The total CalARP Program fees for the eight facilities subject to the Industrial Safety Ordinance was $822,604. The total Industrial Safety Ordinance program fees for these eight facilities was $578,390. (NOTE: These fees include those for the County and City of Richmond ISO facilities). . 13. Summarize total personnel and personnel years utilized by the jurisdiction to directly implement or administer this Chapter (450-8.030(B)(5)): 3,828 hours were used to audit/inspect and issue reports on the Risk Management Chapter of the Industrial Safety Ordinance. 14. Copies of any comments received by the source (that may not have been received by the Department) regarding the effectiveness of the local program that raise public safety issues(450-8.030(B)(6)): None 15. Summarize how this Chapter improves industrial safety at your stationary source (450- 8.030(B)(7)): This chapter reinforces the need to maintain, follow, and continuously improve our structured safety program to help ensure the safety of our employees and the community in which we operate. 16. List examples of changes made at your stationary source due to implementation of the Industrial Safety Ordinance (e.g., recommendations from PHA’s, Compliance Audits, and Incident Investigations in units not subject to CalARP regulations; recommendations from RCA’s) that significantly decrease the severity or likelihood of accidental releases. (1) Implementing the RBI (Risk Based Inspection) program to evaluate and prioritize mechanical inspections prior-to and during the scheduled 2019 TAR, 2) Conducting Procedural HazOps on procedures that have a direct affect on facility personnel safety and/or community process safety; Ammonia Offloading SOP, 4160 VAC Switching SOP, 3) Air Liquide completed recertification of 5 contractors as part of a supply chain risk management program. The audits were conducted by Avetta. 4) Employee “Safety Champions” conduct monthly Life Critical Assessments (Safe Work, LOTO, Elevated Work, Confined Space) and provice feedback to plant and Air Liquide personnel. 6) Plant-wide personnel conduct “Safe Trak” observations and contractor safety assessments, and document in Air Liquide’s Intelex system. 17. Summarize the emergency response activities conducted at the source (e.g., CWS or TEN activation) in response to major chemical accidents or releases: None 18. Common Process Safety Performance Indicators: Written questionnaire. 35 19. Date the results of the Safety Culture Assessment were reported to the workforce: unknown management: 9/22/2016. 20. Answer the following regarding the Safety Culture Evaluation for no. 18: –Areas of improvements being addressed: Living HSE –Did the action plan from the previous (before no. 18) SCA make progress on the identified areas of improvement? (Yes or No) This was the first Safety Assessment of the Rodeo site.. » If Yes, did the improvements meet the goals and if not was the action plan amended to address what is being done to meet the goals? N/A » If No, has a new action plan been developed to address the identified areas of improvement? (Yes or No) N/A 21. Have milestones and metrics been developed to determine how the Safety Culture Assessment actions are being implemented? Yes or if no, Why not?: T? Living HSE is discussed in the morning 0830 meeting as the opportunity presents itself. Additionally, employees are allowed to take some PPE home for personal use, and Air Liquide offers a 9x80 work schedule for certain job positions. . 22. Describe the process that included employees and their representatives used to determine if the action items effectively changed the expected culture items: General discussions during morning safety meetings and monthly SSM’s. 23. Date of the mid-cycle progress evaluation: for SCA dated: »Based on the mid-cycle evaluation, did the action plan for the SCA make progress on the identified areas of improvement? (Yes or No) » If not, has a new action plan been developed? (Yes or No) 24. Describe the process that included participation of employees or their representatives used to determine whether the action items from the SCA and the mid-cycle progress effectively changed the expected culture items: 25. Common Process Safety Performance Indicators: 36 Overdue inspection for piping and pressure vessels based on total number of circuits Past due PHA recommended actions, includes seismic and LCC recommended actions 2018 Overdue Repeat January 16 0 February 16 0 March 16 0 April 16 0 May 16 0 June 16 0 July 16 0 August 16 0 September 16 0 October 16 0 November 16 0 December 16 0 2018 Overdue Repeat January 37 0 February 37 0 March 34 0 April 33 0 May 24 0 June 21 0 July 19 0 August 17 0 September 14 0 October 11 0 November 8 0 December 3 0 Total number of circuits: 22 piping circuits, 37 vessels Total number of annual planned circuit inspections: 27, Vessel Inspections–49 (planned for 2019) Annual Performance Review and Evaluation Submittal–October 1, 2018 *Attach additional pages as necessary Annual Performance Review and Evaluation Submittal 37 Past due investigation recommended actions for API/ACC Tier 1 and Tier 2 incidents 2017 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 No. Tier 1 LOPC 00000000 Incident rate for Tier 1 00000000 Refinery or Industry Rate1 0.15 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.06 Refinery or Industry Mean2 * 1.49 1.30 1.38 1.55 1.01 Tier 2 LOPC 00000000 Incident rate for Tier 2 00000000 Refinery Rate1 * 0.24 0.25 0.23 0.20 0.17 Refinery Mean2 ****3.082.78 API/ACC TIER 1 & TIER 2 INCIDENTS AND RATES STARTING 2011 1Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery rate for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 2Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery mean for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 *Refinery Industry rates or means are not publicly available 38 Annual Performance Review and Evaluation Submittal October 1, 2018 *Attach additional pages as necessary 1. Name and address of Stationary Source: Air Products—Shell Martinez Refinery, 110 Waterfront Road, Martinez, CA 94553 2. Contact name and telephone number (should CCHMP have questions): Harold Allen 925-372-9302 x15 3. Summarize the status of the Stationary Source’s Safety Plan and Program (450-8.030(B)(2)(i)): The stationary source’s safety plan is complete per the CCHS requirement. The program was audited in January 2018 by CCHS as part of the three year CCHS site audit. Recommended updates are pending completion. 4. Summarize Safety Plan updates (i.e., brief explanation of update and corresponding date) (450-8.030(B)(2)(ii)): The three year periodic audit completed in January 2018 recommended some updates to the site safety plan. These are currently pending review and resubmittal. 5. List of locations where Safety Plans are/will be available for review, including contact telephone numbers if the source will provide individuals with copies of the document (450- 8.030(B)(2)(ii)): CCHMP Office at 4585 Pacheco Boulevard, Suite 100, Martinez; Martinez Library (libraries closest to the stationary source). 6. Provide any additions to the annual accident history reports (i.e. updates) submitted pursuant to Section 450-8.016(E)(2) of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2)(iii)) (i.e., provide information identified in Section 450-8.016(E)(1) for all major chemical accidents or releases occurring between the last annual performance review report and the current annual performance review and evaluation submittal (12-month history)): There were no major accidents or releases to report. 7. Summary of each Root Cause Analysis (Section 450-8.016(C)) including the status of the analysis and the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during the analysis (450-8.030(B)(2)(iv)): No RCAs subject to MCAR events have been performed due to no major accidents or releases. The site does not have any overdue action items. 8. Summary of the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during audits, inspections, Root Cause Analyses, or Incident Investigations conducted by the Department (450-8.030(B)(2)(v)): Final recommendations from the 3 year CCCHS audit are under review, specifically adjustments to the safety culture assessment and MCAR LOPA study and Safeguard Protection analysis. A series of larger teams have been compiled to address these two specific areas as they required more resources than the staff has readily available. 9. Summary of inherently safer systems implemented by the source including but not limited to inventory reduction (i.e., intensification) and substitution (450-8.030(B)(2)(vi)): IIn 2018: C101A/B and C200 outfitted with double blocks with bleeds to avoid rolling feedgas blinds during compressor isolation (worker safety and process safety); elevated chemical addition tanks atop engineered stands to both improve chemical usage productivity and worker body position; Replacement of the entire condensate line (worker safety); replacement of reformer peephole refractory (worker safety); major electrical updates to switch gear and improvement to remote monitoring of high voltage electrical equipment (process safety); major motor replacements (process safety); significant 39 replacements of convection section piping, coils and expansion joints (process safety); full undercarriage replacement with tube inspection with limited replacement based on diametric growth and observed creep; PSA overtermperature protection; full HMI upgrade. . 10. Summarize the enforcement actions (including Notice of Deficiencies, Audit Reports, and any actions turned over to the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office) taken with the Stationary Source pursuant to Section 450-8.028 of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2) (vii)): There were no enforcement actions during this period. 11. Summarize total penalties assessed as a result of enforcement of this Chapter (450-8.030(3)): No penalities have been assessed against this facility. 12. Summarize the total fees, service charges, and other assessments collected specifically for the support of the ISO (450-8.030(B)(4)): The total CalARP Program fees for the eight facilities subject to the Industrial Safety Ordinance was $822,604. The total Industrial Safety Ordinance program fees for these eight facilities was—$578,390. (NOTE: These fees include those for the County and City of Richmond ISO facilities). 13. Summarize total personnel and personnel years utilized by the jurisdiction to directly implement or administer this Chapter (450-8.030(B)(5)): 3,828 hours were used to audit/inspect and issue reports on the Risk Management Chapter of the Industrial Safety Ordinance. 14. Copies of any comments received by the source (that may not have been received by the Department) regarding the effectiveness of the local program that raise public safety issues(450-8.030(B)(6)): None. 15. Summarize how this Chapter improves industrial safety at your stationary source (450-8.030(B)(7)): Air Products is committed to the safer operation of our facilities and has implemented applicable requirements outlined in the ISO and CalARP regulations. Both the ISO and Human Factors programs are an integral part of our five year Operating Hazard Review revalidations and ongoing management of change process. There have been no incidents resulting in an offsite impact. The Chapter has helped reinforce the need to maintain and follow a structured safety program to help ensure the safety of our empoloyees and the communities in which we operate. 16. List examples of changes made at your stationary source due to implementation of the Industrial Safety Ordinance (e.g., recommendations from PHA’s, Compliance Audits, and Incident Investigations in units not subject to CalARP regulations; recommendations from RCA’s) that significantly decrease the severity or likelihood of accidental releases. The Air Products facility is tracking various metrics (leading and lagging). These include those called out in ISO API/ACC Tier 1 and 2 events, past due PHA recommendations and past due incident investigation recommendations. A baseline was developed and metrics are tracked for the facility on a company share site. 17. Summarize the emergency response activities conducted at the source (e.g., CWS or TEN activation) in response to major chemical accidents or releases: A joint emergency response activity requiring shelter in place, muster and accountability ws performed with the customer—Shell Oil in 2017 and 2018. Additionally, a full site evacuation drill was conducted at the onset of the May 2018 outage with the full participation of 300+ contractors and Air Products personnel. The site will coordinate 1.5 months in advance for any additional emergency response scenarios and tabletop drills 40 18. Date the last Safety Culture Assessment was completed: January 2015 Survey method:Written 19. Date the results of the Safety Culture Assessment were reported to the workforce: 90 days Management: 60 days. 20. Answer the following regarding the Safety Culture Evaluation for no. 18: – Areas of improvements being addressed: Overall execution and compliance, safety program performance and personal responsibility among each team member; incorporating more interviews as a means of collecting additional qualitative information – Did the action plan from the previous (before no. 18) SCA make progress on the identified areas of improvement? No » If Yes, did the improvements meet the goals and if not was the action plan amended to address what is being done to meet the goals? » If No, has a new action plan been developed to address the identified areas of improvement? Currently under development 21. Have milestones and metrics been developed to determine how the Safety Culture Assessment actions are being implemented? Yes or if not, Why not? Milestone reviews and metrics are currently under development. A similar effort was recently conducted during the 2018 calendar year entitled Operational discipline, which shares many of the same functions of Safety Culture assessment. Employee participation was greater, a facilitator was used to coordinate the training, and employee feedback/data was gathered to determine the path forward. 22. Describe the process that included employees and their representatives used to determine if the action items effectively changed the expected culture items: Additional data needs to be collected before the team can report out on this effectively. 23. Date of the mid-cycle progress evaluation: February 2019 for SCA dated: Jan 2015 » Based on the mid-cycle evaluation, did the action plan for the SCA make progress on the identified areas of improvement? (Yes or No) Too soon to determine » If not, has a new action pan been developed? (Yes or No) Presently under development 24. Describe the process that included participation of employees or their representatives used to determine whether the action items from the SCA and the mid-cycle progress effectively changed the expected culture items: Not applicable. 41 Overdue inspection for piping and pressure vessels based on total number of circuits Past due PHA recommended actions, includes seismic and LCC recommended actions 2018 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 2018 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Total number of circuits: 91 completed during calendar year 2018 Total number of annual planned circuit inspections: 91 25. Common Process Safety Performance Indicators: 42 Past due investigation recommended actions for API/ACC Tier 1 and Tier 2 incidents 2017 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 2018 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 No. Tier 1 LOPC 00000000 Incident rate for Tier 1 00000000 Refinery or Industry Rate1 0.1553 0.0995 0.0947 0.0925 0.1038 0.0627 Refinery or Industry Mean2 * 1.49 1.30 1.38 1.55 1.01 Tier 2 LOPC 00000000 Incident rate for Tier 2 00000000 Refinery Rate1 * 0.2405 0.2531 0.2380 0.2063 0.1726 Refinery Mean2 ****3.082.78 API/ACC TIER 1 & TIER 2 INCIDENTS AND RATES STARTING 2011 1Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery rate for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 2Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery mean for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 *Refinery Industry rates or means are not publicly available 43 October 1, 2018 *Attach additional pages as necessary 1. Name and address of Stationary Source: Marathon Martinez Refinery, 150 Solano Way, 3rd & F Streets, Inside Tesoro Refinery, CA 94553 2. Contact name and telephone number (should CCHMP have questions): Harold Allen (925)372-9302 x15 or Andrew Celin 925-313-8990 x10 3. Summarize the status of the Stationary Source’s Safety Plan and Program (450-8.030(B)(2)(i)): The stationary sourse’s safety plan is complete per the CCHS requirement. The program was audited in January 2018 by CCHS as part of the three year CCHS site audit. Recommended updates are pending completion. 4. Summarize Safety Plan updates (i.e., brief explanation of update and corresponding date) (450-8.030(B)(2)(ii)): The three year periodic audit completed in January 2018 recommended some updates to the site safety plan. These are currently pending review and resubmittal. 5. List of locations where Safety Plans are/will be available for review, including contact telephone numbers if the source will provide individuals with copies of the document (450- 8.030(B)(2)(ii)): CCHMP Office at 4585 Pacheco Boulevard, Suite 100, Martinez; Martinez Library (libraries closest to the stationary source). 6. Provide any additions to the annual accident history reports (i.e. updates) submitted pursuant to Section 450-8.016(E)(2) of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2)(iii)) (i.e., provide information identified in Section 450-8.016(E)(1) for all major chemical accidents or releases occurring between the last annual performance review report and the current annual performance review and evaluation submittal (12-month history)): There were no major accidents or releases to report. 7. Summary of each Root Cause Analysis (Section 450-8.016(C)) including the status of the analysis and the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during the analysis (450-8.030(B)(2)(iv)): No RCAs subject to MCAR events have been performed due to no major accidents or releases. The site does not have any overdue action items. 8. Summary of the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during audits, inspections, Root Cause Analyses, or Incident Investigations conducted by the Department (450-8.030(B)(2)(v)): Final recommendations from the 3 year CCCHS audit are under review, specifically adjustments to the safety culture assessment and MCAR LOPA study and Safeguard Protection analysis. A series of larger teams have been compiled to address these two specific areas as they required more resources than the staff has readily available. 9. Summary of inherently safer systems implemented by the source including but not limited to inventory reduction (i.e., intensification) and substitution (450-8.030(B)(2)(vi)): In 2017: PSA Over Temperature Protection (Process Safety), Double blocks to Steam system for use during Plant Startup (Worker Safety), Install Process Gas Boiler Intermittent Blowdown Drum (Worker Safety); completion of chemical addition berm for secondary containment (2018). 44 10. Summarize the enforcement actions (including Notice of Deficiencies, Audit Reports, and any actions turned over to the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office) taken with the Stationary Source pursuant to Section 450-8.028 of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2) (vii)): There were no enforcement actions during this period. 11. Summarize total penalties assessed as a result of enforcement of this Chapter (450-8.030(3)): No penalities have been assessed against this facility. 12. Summarize the total fees, service charges, and other assessments collected specifically for the support of the ISO (450-8.030(B)(4)): The total CalARP Program fees for the eight facilities subject to the Industrial Safety Ordinance was $822,604. The total Industrial Safety Ordinance program fees for these eight facilities was - $578,390. (NOTE: These fees include those for the County and City of Richmond ISO facilities). 13. Summarize total personnel and personnel years utilized by the jurisdiction to directly implement or administer this Chapter (450-8.030(B)(5)): 3,828 hours were used to audit/inspect and issue reports on the Risk Management Chapter of the Industrial Safety Ordinance. 14. Copies of any comments received by the source (that may not have been received by the Department) regarding the effectiveness of the local program that raise public safety issues(450-8.030(B)(6)): None. 15. Summarize how this Chapter improves industrial safety at your stationary source (450-8.030(B)(7)): Air Products is committed to the safer operation of our facilities and has implemented applicable requirements outlined in the ISO and CalARP regulations. Both the ISO and Human Factors programs are an integral part of our five year Operating Hazard Review revalidations and on going management of change process. The most recent OPHR was completed in April 2018, and attended by CCHS personnel. There have been no incidents resulting in an offsite impact. The Chapter has helped reinforce the need to maintain and follow a structured safety program to help ensure the safety of our empoloyees and the communities in which we operate. 16. List examples of changes made at your stationary source due to implementation of the Industrial Safety Ordinance (e.g., recommendations from PHA’s, Compliance Audits, and Incident Investigations in units not subject to CalARP regulations; recommendations from RCA’s) that significantly decrease the severity or likelihood of accidental releases. The Air Products facility is tracking various metrics (leading and lagging). These include those called out in ISO API/ ACC Tier 1 and 2 events, past due PHA recommendations and past due incident investigation recommendations. A baseline was developed, and metrics are tracked for the facility on a company share site. 17. Summarize the emergency response activities conducted at the source (e.g., CWS or TEN activation) in response to major chemical accidents or releases: An emergency drill was conducted along with first responders from Marathon oil on November 7, 2018 as a result of a personal medical. Responders were called to site, attended to a visitor, and escorted him to the medical unit for observation. 18. Date the last Safety Culture Assessment was completed: January 2015 Survey method:Written 45 19. Date the results of the Safety Culture Assessment were reported to the workforce: 90 days Management: 60 days 20. Answer the following regarding the Safety Culture Evaluation for no. 18: – Areas of improvements being addressed: Overall execution and compliance, safety program performance and personal responsibility among each team member; incorporating more interviews as a means of collecting additional qualitative information – Did the action plan from the previous (before no. 18) SCA make progress on the identified areas of improvement? No » If Yes, did the improvements meet the goals and if not was the action plan amended to address what is being done to meet the goals? » If No, has a new action plan been developed to address the identified areas of improvement? Currently under development 21. Have milestones and metrics been developed to determine how the Safety Culture Assessment actions are being implemented? Yes or if not, Why not? Milestone reviews and metrics are currently under development. A similar effort was recently conducted during the 2018 calendar year entitled Operational discipline, which shares many of the same functions of Safety Culture assessment. Employee participation was greater, a facilitator was used to coordinate the training, and employee feedback/data was gathered to determine the path forward. 22. Describe the process that included employees and their representatives used to determine if the action items effectively changed the expected culture items: Additional data needs to be collected before the team can report out on this effectively. 23. Date of the mid-cycle progress evaluation: February 2019 for SCA dated: Jan 2015 » Based on the mid-cycle evaluation, did the action plan for the SCA make progress on the identified areas of improvement? (Yes or No) Too soon to determine » If not, has a new action pan been developed? (Yes or No) Presently under development 24. Describe the process that included participation of employees or their representatives used to determine whether the action items from the SCA and the mid-cycle progress effectively changed the expected culture items: Not applicable. 46 Overdue inspection for piping and pressure vessels based on total number of circuits 2018 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Total number of circuits: 660 Total number of annual planned circuit inspections: 131 during calendar year 2018 Past due PHA recommended actions, includes seismic and LCC recommended actions 2018 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 25. Common Process Safety Performance Indicators: 47 Past due investigation recommended actions for API/ACC Tier 1 and Tier 2 incidents 2018 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 1 April 0 1 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 No. Tier 1 LOPC 00000000 Incident rate for Tier 1 00000000 Refinery or Industry Rate1 0.1553 0.0995 0.0947 0.0925 0.1038 0.0627 Refinery or Industry Mean2 * 1.49 1.30 1.38 1.55 1.01 Tier 2 LOPC 00000000 Incident rate for Tier 2 00000000 Refinery Rate1 * 0.2405 0.2531 0.2380 0.2063 0.1726 Refinery Mean2 ****3.082.78 API/ACC TIER 1 & TIER 2 INCIDENTS AND RATES STARTING 2011 1Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery rate for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 2Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery mean for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 *Refinery Industry rates or means are not publicly available 48 Annual Performance Review and Evaluation Submittal October 1, 2018 *Attach additional pages as necessary 1. Name and address of Stationary Source: Phillips 66 Rodeo Refinery, 1380 San Pablo Avenue, Rodeo, CA 94572 2. Contact name and telephone number (should CCHMP have questions): Morgan Walker 510-245-4665 3. Summarize the status of the Stationary Source’s Safety Plan and Program (450-8.030(B)(2)(i)): The Safety Plan was last updated in August of 2015. 4. Summarize Safety Plan updates (i.e., brief explanation of update and corresponding date) (450-8.030(B)(2)(ii)): The original Safety Plan for this facility was filed with Contra Costa Health Services on January 14, 2000. A revised plan was filed on April 7, 2000 with the updated recommendations requested by CCHS. A Human Factors Amendment was submitted on January 15, 2001. In conjunction with CCHSs required 2nd public meeting on our plan and audit findings, we submitted a complete revision of the plan to reflect the change in ownership of our facility and to update where needed. We took this opportunity to include Human Factors within the plan instead of having it as an amendment. On August 9, 2002 the plan was resubmitted. Public meetings for our plans were held on June 22, 20 04 in Rodeo and July 8, 2004 in Crockett. As required the Plan was fully updated in August 2005 on the 3 year cycle. The Plan was reviewed by CCHS and was revised on July 28, 2006 with recommended changes. The Safety Plan was updated in July 2009 per the 3 year cycle.. Recommendations requested by CCHMP were incorporated into the Safety Plan on November 4, 2010. Safety Plan was updated in August 2012 and August 2015 per the 3 year cycle. Recommendations requested by CCHMP on May 22, 2017 were incorporated into the plan on August 4, 2017. 5. List of locations where Safety Plans are/will be available for review, including contact telephone numbers if the source will provide individuals with copies of the document (450- 8.030(B)(2)(ii)): CCHMP Office at 4585 Pacheco Boulevard, Suite 100, Martinez; Crockett and Rodeo Libraries (libraries closest to the stationary source). 6. Provide any additions to the annual accident history reports (i.e. updates) submitted pursuant to Section 450-8.016(E)(2) of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2)(iii)) (i.e., provide information identified in Section 450-8.016(E)(1) for all major chemical accidents or releases occurring between the last annual performance review report and the current annual performance review and evaluation submittal (12-month history)): There were no major chemical accidents or releases at the Rodeo Refinery in the 2017–2018 time period. 7. Summary of each Root Cause Analysis (Section 450-8.016(C)) including the status of the analysis and the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during the analysis (450-8.030(B) (2)(iv)): There were no root cause analysis of major chemical accidents or releases at the Rodeo Refinery in the 2017–2018 time period. 49 8. Summary of the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during audits, inspections, Root Cause Analyses, or Incident Investigations conducted by the Department (450-8.030(B)(2)(v)): There are 6 remaining “ensure” open items from the 2017 CalARP ISO Audit. They are scheduled to close in October 2018. There are 7 remaining “consider” items from the 2017 CalARP ISO audit. All but one item are scheduled to close in 2018. The last item will be closed with the 2019 RMP submittal. 9. Summary of inherently safer systems implemented by the source including but not limited to inventory reduction (i.e., intensification) and substitution (450-8.030(B)(2)(vi)): See ATTACHMENT 1 for the listing of Inherently Safer Systems Improvements. 10. Summarize the enforcement actions (including Notice of Deficiencies, Audit Reports, and any actions turned over to the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office) taken with the Stationary Source pursuant to Section 450-8.028 of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2) (vii)): There were no enforcement actions during this period. 11. Summarize total penalties assessed as a result of enforcement of this Chapter (450-8.030(3)): No penalities have been assessed against this facility. 12. Summarize the total fees, service charges, and other assessments collected specifically for the support of the ISO (450-8.030(B)(4)): The total CalARP Program fees for the eight facilities subject to the Industrial Safety Ordinance was $822,604. The total Industrial Safety Ordinance program fees for these eight facilities was —$578,390. (NOTE: These fees include those for the County and City of Richmond ISO facilities). 13. Summarize total personnel and personnel years utilized by the jurisdiction to directly implement or administer this Chapter (450-8.030(B)(5)): 3,828 hours were used to audit/inspect and issue reports on the Risk Management Chapter of the Industrial Safety Ordinance. 14. Copies of any comments received by the source (that may not have been received by the Department) regarding the effectiveness of the local program that raise public safety issues(450-8.030(B)(6)): No comments were received. 15. Summarize how this Chapter improves industrial safety at your stationary source (450- 8.030(B)(7)): In addition to the Phillips 66 Corporate Health Safety Environment Management Systems the ISO provides another tool for the improvement of process safety performance. 16. List examples of changes made at your stationary source due to implementation of the Industrial Safety Ordinance (e.g., recommendations from PHA’s, Compliance Audits, and Incident Investigations in units not subject to CalARP regulations; recommendations from RCA’s) that significantly decrease the severity or likelihood of accidental releases. Units that were not covered by RMP, CalARP, and PSM are covered under the ISO and PHAs are scheduled and performed on all these units. Recommendations from the PHAs are implemented at an accelerated rate. A list of inherently safer system improvements, required by the ISO for PHA recommendations and projects, are listed in Attachment 1. 50 17. Summarize the emergency response activities conducted at the source (e.g., CWS or TEN activation) in response to major chemical accidents or releases: There were no major chemical accidents or releases at the Rodeo Refinery in the 2017–2018 time period. 18. Date the last Safety Culture Assessment was completed: 4/15/2016 Survey method: written survey 19. Date the results of the Safety Culture Assessment were reported to the workforce: 6/24/16 management: 4/15/16 20. Answer the following regarding the Safety Culture Evaluation for no. 18: –Areas of improvements being addressed: 1. No areas were identified as scoring significantly below normal values. 2. Improvements require too many reviews/approvals. 3. Employees are reluctant to reveal problems or errors. 4. Having enough qualified people to do the work in their area. –Did the action plan from the previous (before no. 18) SCA make progress on the identified areas of –improvement? (Yes or No) YES 1. If Yes, did the improvements meet the goals and if not was the action plan amended to address what is being done to meet the goals? Yes, Progress was made and improvements observed in the subsequent SCA. Improvement opportunities were identified in the most recent SCA and recommendations identified. 2. If No, has a new action plan been developed to address the identified areas of improvement? (Yes or No) 21. Have milestones and metrics been developed to determine how the Safety Culture Assessment actions are being implemented? Yes or if not, Why not? YES. Specific improvements were identified by a management & union team and implemented. 22. Describe the process that included employees and their representatives used to determine if the action items effectively changed the expected culture items: A midcycle written survey will be utilized to evaluate the effects on the culture. 23. Date of the mid-cycle progress evaluation: 4/2019 for SCA dated: 4/2016 »Based on the mid-cycle evaluation, did the action plan for the SCA make progress on the identified areas of improvement? (Yes or No) To be determined. »If not, has a new action pan been developed? (Yes or No) 24. Describe the process that included participation of employees or their representatives used to determine whether the action items from the SCA and the mid-cycle progress effectively changed the expected culture items: Joint Management and union team used to evaluate results and develop modified recommendations as appropriate. 51 Past due PHA recommended actions, includes seismic and LCC recommended actions 2018 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Overdue inspection for piping and pressure vessels based on total number of circuits 2018 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Total number of circuits: 22,193 Total number of annual planned circuit inspections: 4,795 25. Common Process Safety Performance Indicators: 52 Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 No. Tier 1 LOPC 23002000 Incident rate for Tier 1 0.17 0.29 0 0 0.21 0 0 0 Refinery or Industry Rate1 0.1553 0.0995 0.0947 0.0925 0.1038 0.0627 0.0761 * Refinery or Industry Mean2 * 1.49 1.30 1.38 1.55 1.01 1.13 * Tier 2 LOPC 53012220 Incident rate for Tier 2 0.43 0.29 0 0.10 0.21 0.17 0.22 0 Refinery Rate1 * 0.2405 0.2531 0.2380 0.2063 0.1726 0.1843 * Refinery Mean2 * * * * 3.08 2.78 2.73 * API/ACC TIER 1 & TIER 2 INCIDENTS AND RATES STARTING 2011 1 Petroleum refineries to report publicly available refinery rate for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publicly available mean only for ACC Tier 1 2Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery mean for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 *At the time of the submittal, these Refinery Industry rates or means are not publicly available. A revised report will be sent when they are published to the public. Past due investigation recommended actions for API/ACC Tier 1 and Tier 2 incidents 2018 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 53 ħ!$,1'2;V<2'h<2'¥ -1683='1'2;9 Reference Approach ISS Category MOC Description M20163878-001 Moderate Active Locked open a block valve to minimize the likelihood for liquid thermal expansion due to inadvertent closure of valve.. M20163946-001 Moderate Passive Upgraded schedule 40 piping at compressor discharge with schedule 80 piping to be able to withstand higher pressures. M20171358-001 Moderate Passive Upgraded heat exchanger tube bundle wall thickness from 0.085” to 0.095” to minimize likelihood of loss of containment due to corrosion. M20163986-001 Moderate Passive Upgraded the thickness of a segment of line from schedule 80 to schedule 160 and upgraded the thickness of a segment of line from schedule 40 to schedule 80, this would minimize likelihood of loss of containment due to corrosion. M20162364-002 Moderate Passive Installed alarms (pre-alarm and alarm) to indicate approach of process conditions to Safety Operating Limit (SOL), which would minimize the likelihood of exceeding equipment design limit to result in a hazardous consequence.. M20163425-001 Moderate Active ,QVWDOOHGD6,/UDWHGVKXWGRZQWRPLWLJDWHSRWHQWLDORYHUSUHVVXUHVFHQDULRWKDWZDVLGHQWL¿HGLQ a PHA. M20165971-001 Moderate Active Locked open a block valve to ensure opened pressure relief path in an overpressure scenario. M20154566-001 Moderate Active Replaced existing pressure relief device to reduce inlet pressure losses in an overpressure scenario. M20165744-001 Moderate Passive Upgraded schedule 40 piping at compressor discharge with schedule 80 piping to be able to withstand higher pressures. M20161873-001 Simplify Active Steps in emergency procedure were automated by installing new control schemes. MM20172599-001 Moderate Active 1HZSURFHVVFRQWUROLQVWUXPHQWDWLRQZDVLQVWDOOHGRQIXUQDFHVWRSUHYHQWIXHOULFK¿UHER[ condition. M20151512-001 Moderate Active Replaced existing pressure relief device to mitigate additional overpressure scenarios. M20164651-001 Moderate Active Replaced existing pressure relief device to reduce backpressure in an overpressure scenario. M20144571-001 Moderate Passive An existing tower was replaced with a smaller diameter tower thereby reducing inventory volume. Additionally, this project decreased the volume of hydrocarbon feed to a furnace by 20% which reduces WKHIXUQDFH¿ULQJUDWHDQGFDUERQIRRWSULQW M20167494-001 Moderate Passive A pump impeller size was reduced, thereby derating the pump’s maximum discharge pressure below piping pressure rating at the discharge. M20164710-001 Moderate Active 5HSODFHGH[LVWLQJSUHVVXUHUHOLHIGHYLFHZLWKDOLTXLGWULPGHYLFHWRSURSHUO\PLWLJDWHLGHQWL¿HG overpressure scenario for protected vessel. 54 Annual Performance Review and Evaluation Submittal October 1, 2018 *Attach additional pages as necessary 1. Name and address of Stationary Source: Shell Oil Products U.S. Martinez Refinery, 3485 Pacheco Blvd., Martinez, CA 94553 2. Contact name and telephone number (should CCHMP have questions): Nicola Maher: 925-229-6175 3. Summarize the status of the Stationary Source’s Safety Plan and Program (450-8.030(B)(2)(i)): SMR’s Safety Plan was last updated in August 2016. SMR’s Safety Plan is due for update in August 2019. 4. Summarize Safety Plan updates (i.e., brief explanation of update and corresponding date) (450-8.030(B)(2)(ii)): SMR’s Safety Plan was last updated in August 2016. The changes addressed actions from the CCHS 2015 audit. 5. List of locations where Safety Plans are/will be available for review, including contact telephone numbers if the source will provide individuals with copies of the document (450- 8.030(B)(2)(ii)): CCHMP Office at 4585 Pacheco Boulevard, Suite 100, Martinez; Martinez Library (libraries closest to the stationary source). 6. Provide any additions to the annual accident history reports (i.e. updates) submitted pursuant to Section 450-8.016(E)(2) of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2)(iii)) (i.e., provide information identified in Section 450-8.016(E)(1) for all major chemical accidents or releases occurring between the last annual performance review report and the current annual performance review and evaluation submittal (12-month history)): None. 7. Summary of each Root Cause Analysis (Section 450-8.016(C)) including the status of the analysis and the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during the analysis (450-8.030(B) (2)(iv)): No outstanding actions. Last MCAR was 12/19/16—Loss of power to substations 1203 and 1206—The Root Cause Analysis was completed and the report was submitted to the CCHMD in 2017. Action items with a 2017 due date were completed on schedule and the remaining actions that had a 2018 due date were completed by the 2/28/2018 due date. 8. Summary of the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during audits, inspections, Root Cause Analyses, or Incident Investigations conducted by the Department (450-8.030(B)(2)(v)): There have been no RCA’s or Incident Investigations conducted by the Department. Action Items from the 2018 CCHS Audit are pending finalization at this time. All action items from 2015 CCHS Audit are completed. 9. Summary of inherently safer systems implemented by the source including but not limited to inventory reduction (i.e., intensification) and substitution (450-8.030(B)(2)(vi)): See Attachment 1, Table 1 55 10. Summarize the enforcement actions (including Notice of Deficiencies, Audit Reports, and any actions turned over to the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office) taken with the Stationary Source pursuant to Section 450-8.028 of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2) (vii)): There were no enforcement actions during this period. 11. Summarize total penalties assessed as a result of enforcement of this Chapter (450-8.030(3)): No penalities have been assessed against this facility. 12. Summarize the total fees, service charges, and other assessments collected specifically for the support of the ISO (450-8.030(B)(4)): The total CalARP Program fees for the eight facilities subject to the Industrial Safety Ordinance was $822,604. The total Industrial Safety Ordinance program fees for these eight facilities was—$578,390. (NOTE: These fees include those for the County and City of Richmond ISO facilities). 13. Summarize total personnel and personnel years utilized by the jurisdiction to directly implement or administer this Chapter (450-8.030(B)(5)): 3,828 hours were used to audit/inspect and issue reports on the Risk Management Chapter of the Industrial Safety Ordinance. 14. Copies of any comments received by the source (that may not have been received by the Department) regarding the effectiveness of the local program that raise public safety issues(450-8.030(B)(6)): None received 15. Summarize how this Chapter improves industrial safety at your stationary source (450- 8.030(B)(7)): SMR has integrated requirements of the Industrial Safety Ordinance into our Health, Safety, and Environment Management System; in the context of our HSE MS, the ISO requirements drive continual improvement in our HSE performance. 16. List examples of changes made at your stationary source due to implementation of the Industrial Safety Ordinance (e.g., recommendations from PHA’s, Compliance Audits, and Incident Investigations in units not subject to CalARP regulations; recommendations from RCA’s) that significantly decrease the severity or likelihood of accidental releases. All process units are now covered under CalARP Program 4. Examples of changes made to the stationary source are summarized in Table 1 (see question 9). 17. Summarize the emergency response activities conducted at the source (e.g., CWS or TEN activation) in response to major chemical accidents or releases: None. 18. Date the last Safety Culture Assessment was completed: 4th Quarter 2015 Survey method: Anonymous Paper and computer based questions with multiple choice answers 19. Date the results of the Safety Culture Assessment were reported to the workforce: 12/7/15– 1/31/16 management: 12/7/15–1/31/16 56 20. Answer the following regarding the Safety Culture Evaluation for no. 18: – Areas of improvements being addressed: Feedback on safety incident investigations or near miss reports, rewarding good HSE performance and safety communications. – Did the action plan from the previous (before no. 18) SCA make progress on the identified areas of improvement? (Yes or No) yes » If Yes, did the improvements meet the goals and if not was the action plan amended to address what is being done to meet the goals? » There was no defined action plan created for the 2010 survey, however as a result of actions taken after the 2010 survey there were changes in the 2015 results. The 2010 survey identified actions to address Management Commitment and Leadership and for rewarding good HSE performance. There were no questions with a decrease in “Favorable” responses between 2010 and 2015 (9 questions were repeated). This showed improvement. Rewarding good HSE performance was a repeat area of improvement in 2010 and 2015. New actions came out of the 2015 survey but were incorporated into department, sub-team or individual goals and not summarized and tracked as part of the survey. Going forward with our 2018 report we will make sure to track our actions. » If No, has a new action plan been developed to address the identified areas of improvement? (Yes or No) 21. Have milestones and metrics been developed to determine how the Safety Culture Assessment actions are being implemented? Yes or if not, Why not? No, as per question above, 2015 survey milestones and metrics were not set at a site level and not tracked with the survey. 2018 survey milestones and metrics will be tracked. 22. Describe the process that included employees and their representatives used to determine if the action items effectively changed the expected culture items: The 2018 safety culture was developed with the USW representatives in Process Safety, Health and Safety and Environmental and staff members. The team have worked together on all aspects of the survey (creation, delivery, and analysis) and will be working on action plans and action tracking soon. (based on survey timing at the end of 2018 for data collection). 23. Date of the mid-cycle progress evaluation: None for SCA dated: 12/2015 » Based on the mid-cycle evaluation, did the action plan for the SCA make progress on the identified areas of improvement? (Yes or No) No » If not, has a new action plan been developed? (Yes or No) As above, action plans for the 2015 survey where not collated and managed with the survey. This will be rectified with the action plan for the 12/2018 survey with a mid-cycle evaluation in 2021–2022 24. Describe the process that included participation of employees or their representatives used to determine whether the action items from the SCA and the mid-cycle progress effectively changed the expected culture items: For the 2015 survey the results and potential action items were discussed in a number of forums: Leading for safety meetings, Site Newsletter, Joint Health and Safety Committee, Contractors safety meetings. There was no mid-cycle review meeting. For the 2018 survey, as stated above, the USW HSSE representatives participate in all phases of this survey. 25. Common Process Safety Performance Indicators: 57 Overdue inspection for piping and pressure vessels based on total number of circuits Past due PHA recommended actions, includes seismic and LCC recommended actions 2018 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 2018 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Total number of circuits: 12,251 Total number of annual planned circuit inspections: 1,501 58 Past due investigation recommended actions for API/ACC Tier 1 and Tier 2 incidents 2018 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 1Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery rate for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 2Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery mean for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 * Refinery Industry rates or means are not publicly available. API/ACC TIER 1 & TIER 2 INCIDENTS AND RATES STARTING 2011 Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 No. Tier 1 LOPC 1 1 1 0 1 0 2 Incident rate for Tier 1 0.07 0.07 0.08 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.11 Refinery or Industry rate1 0.15 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 0.06 0.07 Refinery or Industry mean2 * 1.49 1.30 1.38 1.55 1.01 1.13 No. Tier 2 LOPC 2 0 5 2 5 1 2 Incident rate for Tier 2 0.14 0 .41 0.11 0.42 0.06 0.11 Refinery rate1 * 0.24 0.25 0.23 0.20 0.17 0.18 Refinery mean2 * * * * 3.08 2.78 2.73 59 Attachment 1 Table 1: Summary of Implemented ISS Approach ISS Category MOC Description Moderate Passive 8SJUDGHGPHWDOOXUJ\DQG'HVLJQRI¿OWHUKRXVLQJVLQOXEHRLOVHUYLFH Moderate Passive Upgraded metallurgy of piping and valves in DCU heater service Moderate Passive Upgraded Converter reheater condensate piping Moderate Passive Upgraded gas caustic wash cooler Moderate Passive Upgraded piping and bundles in hydrocracker unit Moderate Passive Upgraded materials in heat exchanger in hydrogen plant Moderate Passive Upgraded piping in Flexicoker coke service Moderate Passive Added liner and upgraded components of distributor in alkynation service Moderate Passive Upgraded piping in hydrogen plant Moderate Passive Upgraded Mechanical seal O-rings in alkynation plant Simplfy Inherent Deadleg removal in sulfur plant Moderate Passive Upgrade nitrogen piping in crude uit Moderate Passive Upgraded materials in heat exchanger in delayed coker Simplfy Procedural Change in procedure for vaporizer use in propane service Moderate Procedural Change in procedure to prevent incorrect line up. Moderate Active Installation of heater trips on high/low pressure in DSU Moderate Active Installtion of vibration shutdown system in SRHT heater Moderate Active Installtion of vibration shutdown system in HCU heater Moderate Active ,QVWDOODWLRQRIKHDWHUWULSVIRUORVVRIÀDPHKLJKSUHVVXUHIRU&2&+VHUYLFH 60 Annual Performance Review and Evaluation Submittal June 30, 2019 *Attach additional pages as necessary 1. Name and address of Stationary Source: Tesoro Golden Eagle Refinery, 150 Solano Avenue, Martinez, CA 94553 2. Contact name and telephone number (should CCHS have questions): James Jeter 925-370-3279 or Sabiha Gokcen at 925- 370-3620 . 3. Summarize the status of the Stationary Source’s Safety Plan and Program (450-8.030(B) (2)(i)): The most recent Safety Plan was sumitted to Contra Costa Hazardous Materials Program (CCHMP) in June 2017. CCHMP has compelted seven audts on the safety programs. The first audit was in September 2000 on the Inherently Safety Systems and Human Factors. CalARP/ISO audits were conducted in August 2003, November-December 2005, August-October 2008, April-May 2011, January 2014 and most recently October 2016. All safety program elements required by the ISO have been developed and are implemented. 4. Summarize Safety Plan updates (i.e., brief explanation of update and corresponding date) (450-8.030(B)(2) (ii)): The original Safety Plan for this facility was filed with CCHMP on January 14, 2000. An amended plan, updated to reflect CCHS recommendations and owenership change , was filed on November 30, 2000. A Human Factors Amendment was submitted on January 15, 2001. A Power Disruption Plan was submitted, per Board of Supervisor request, on June 1, 2001. An amended Safety Plan, updated to reflect owenership change was sumitted on June 17, 2002 The Safety Plan for this facility is updated whenever changes at the facility warrant an update or every three years. In addition, the accident history along with other informatio isupdated every year on June 30 in the Annual ISO Update to CCHMP. The most recent Safety Plan was submitted in June, 2017. 5. List of locations where Safety Plans are/will be available for review, including contact telephone numbers if the source will provide individuals with copies of the document (450- 8.030(B)(2)(ii)): CCHMP Office at 4585 Pacheco Boulevard, Suite 100, Martinez; Martinez Library (libraries closest to the stationary source). 6. Provide any additions to the annual accident history reports (i.e. updates) submitted pursuant to Section 450-8.016(£)(2) of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2)(iii)) (i.e., provide information identified in Section 450-8.016(£)(1) for all major chemical accidents or releases occurring between the last accident history report submittal (January 15) and the annual performance review and evaluation submittal (June 30)): There have been no MCARS during the last year. 7. Summary of each Root Cause Analysis (Section 450-8.016(C)) including the status of the analysis and the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during the analysis (450-8.030(B)(2)(iv)): The recommended action tiems for all MCARs are closed. 61 8. Summary of the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during audits, inspections, Root Cause Analyses, or Incident Investigations conducted by the Department (450-8.030(B)(2)(v)): “CCHS Informaton”: CCHS completed an audit on September 15, 2000. December 2001, August 2003, November/December 2005. August-October 2008. April-May 2011, January 2014 and October 2016. There are no RCA or Incident Investigations that have been conducted by the Department. Facility status of audit recommendations: All recommendations from CCHMP audits prior to 2016 are closed. The facilty has not received the 2016 recommendations. 9. Summary of inherently safer systems implemented by the source including but not limited to inventory reduction (i.e., intensification) and substitution (450-8.030(B)(2) (vi)): Tesoro is submitting a list of the Inherenty Safer Systems (ISS) that meet the criteria for Inherent or Passive levels only and that wer ecompelted within the last year (see attached). 10. Summarize the enforcement actions (including Notice of Deficiencies, Audit Reports, and any actions turned over to the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office) taken with the Stationary Source pursuant to Section 450-8.028 of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2)(vii)): There were no enforcement actions during this period. “CCHMP Information”: There were no enforcement actions during this period. 11. Summarize total penalties assessed as a result of enforcement of this Chapter (450- 8.030(3)): No penalities have been assessed against this facility. 12. Summarize the total fees, service charges, and other assessments collected specifically for the support of the ISO (450-8.030(B)(4)): “CHCMP Information”:The total CalARP Program fees for the eight facilities subject to the Industrial Safety Ordinance was $822,604. The total Industrial Safety Ordinance program fees for these eight facilities was—$578,390. (NOTE: These fees include those for the County and City of Richmond ISO facilities). 13. Summarize total personnel and personnel years utilized by the jurisdiction to directly implement or administer this Chapter (450-8.030(B)(5)): ”CCHMP Informaiton”: 3828 hours were used to audit/inspect and issue reports on the Risk Management Chapter of the Industrial Safety Ordinance. 14. Copies of any comments received by the source (that may not have been received by the Department) regarding the effectiveness of the local program that raise public safety issues(450-8.030(B)(6)): The facilty has not received any comments to date regarding the effectiveness of the local program. 15. Summarize how this Chapter improves industrial safety at your stationary source (450- 8.030(B)(7)): Chapter 450-8 improves industrial safety by expanding the safety program to all units in the refinery. In additio, the timeframe is shorter to implement recommendations generated from the Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) safety progam than state or federal law. This has resulted in a faster implementation of these recommendations. Chapter 450-8 also inclues requirements for inhernetly 62 safety systems as part of implmenting inhernetly safer systems in these areas. Chapter 450-8 has requriement to perform root cause analyses on any major chemical accidents or releases (MCAR). This facilty has applied that rigorous methodology to invesitgate any MCARs that have occurred since January, 1999. Chapter 450-8 requries a human factors program. This facility has developed a comprehensive human factors program and is in the process of implementing the program. Chapter 450-8 requires a safety culture assessment. This facilty has develop da safety culture assessment program that meet sthe requirements in the ordinance. 16. List examples of changes made at your stationary source due to implementation of the Industrial Safety Ordinance (e.g., recommendations from PHA’s, Compliance Audits, and Incident Investigations in units not subject to CalARP regulations; recommendations from RCAs) that significantly decrease the severity or likelihood of accidental releases. This question was broadly answered under question 15 above. Some examples of changes that have been made due to implementation of the ordinance are as follows. There are some units that were not covered by RMP, CalARP or PSM. Those units are now subject to the same safety program as the units covered by RMP, CalARP, and PSM. They have had PHAs performed on them according to the timeline specified in the ISO and the PHA recommendations have been resolved on the timeline specified in the ISO. A list of inherently safety systems as required by the ISO for PHA recommendations and new construction is attached to this filing as mentioned in the response to question 9. With respect to Compliance Audits, there was a compliance audit performed in April 2015 an addition to the CCHMP audits mentioned above. All audit findings are being actively resolved. Root Cause Analysis findings and recommendations for MCARs are listed in the response under question 6. 17. Summarize the emergency response activities conducted at the source (e.g., CWS or TEN activation) in response to major chemical accidents or releases: Pleae refer to #6 which has the CWS classifications for the major chemical accidents and releases as well as any information regarding emergency responses by agency personnel. 18. Common Process Safety Performance Indicators: 8/8/16-9/1/16 19. Date the results of the Safety Culture Assessment were reported to the workforce and management: 4/4/17-5/15/16 (workforce) and 11/17/16 (management) 20. Answer the following regarding the Safety Culture Evaluation Previous to the one listed in 18: » Survey method: Survey » Areas of improvements being addressed: The safety culture areas of improvement identified are: the maintenance work process, procedures, leadership of process safety, resources for process safety, and new hire training » Action Plan made Progress on the identified areas of improvement?: (Yes or No) –If Yes, did the improvements meet the goals and if not was the action plan amended to address what is being done to meet the goals? There was improvement from 2013-2016 in some of the identified areas. The action plan for 2016 included the work that was performed previously and addressed continuing the effort to completion –If No, has a new action plan been developed to address the identified areas of improvement? (Yes or No) 21. Have milestones and metrics been developed to determine how the Safety Culture Assessment actions are being implemented? Yes or if not, Why not? Yes 22. Describe the process in place that includes employees and their representatives that will determine if 63 the action items effectively changed the expected culture items: Once the initial report was received on the survey from the 3rd party consultant, the PSM Superintendent and USW Process Safety Representative reviewed the data and recommendations from the consultant in great detail as well as the 2013 survey. A preliminary action plan was developed from the in-depth analysis. The consultant’s report and the preliminary action plan were reviewed with management, the Jt. H&S Committee and the union negotiation committee for input. In addition, the USW Process Safety Representative held several sessions with USW leadership to review the data in more detail. After this process was completed, it was determined the preliminary action plan was the final action plan. 23. Date of the mid-cycle progress evaluation: 2019 for SCA dated 2016 » Did the action plan (for no 18) make progress on the identified areas of improvement? Yes or if not, has a new action pan been developed? (Yes or No) N/A mid-cycle scheduled for this year 24. If a mid-cycle progress evaluation was performed during this reporting year, describe the process that included participation of employees or their representatives that determined whether the action items effectively changed the expected culture items: Please refer to above question detailing development of action plan. Mid-cycle will occur in 2019. 25. Common Process Safety Performance Indicators: Overdue inspection for piping and pressure vessels based on total number of circuits 2017 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Total number of circuits: 7,396 Total number of annual planned circuit inspections: 484 in the year 2017 64 Past due PHA recommended actions, includes seismic and LCC recommended actions 2016 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Past due investigation recommended actions for API/ACC Tier 1 and Tier 2 incidents 2016 Overdue Repeat January 0 2 February 1 0 March 0 1 April 0 1 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 1 0 November 0 1 December 0 1 1Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery rate for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 2Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery mean for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 65 1Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery rate for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 2Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery mean for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 API/ACC TIER 1 & TIER 2 INCIDENTS AND RATES STARTING 2011 Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 No. Tier 1 LOPC 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Incident rate for Tier 1 0 0 0 0.05 0.06 0 0.04 Refinery or Industry mean2 ** .0995 .0947 .0925 .1038 .0627 .0761 No. Tier 2 LOPC 1 1 2 3 3 0 3 Incident rate for Tier 2 0.06 0.05 0.12 0.16 0.17 0 0.12 Refinery mean2 ** 0.2405 0.2531 0.2380 0.2063 0.1726 0.1843 26. Process Safety Performance Indicators for refineries only: I. Number of Major Incidents in 2018: 1 II. The number of temporary piping and equipment repairs that are installed on hydrocarbon and high energy utility systems that are past their date of replacement with a permanent repair: 2017 Overdue Repeat Total* January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 *the total number of temporary piping and equipment repairs installed on hydrocarbon and high energy utility systems. 66 ATTACHMENT C RICHMOND REGULATED SOURCES ANNUAL PERFORMANCE Contra Costa Health Services 2018–19 67 Annual Performance Review and Evaluation Submittal June 27, 2018 *Attach additional pages as necessary 1. Name and address of Stationary Source: Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (CUSA), Richmond Refinery, 841 Chevron Way, Richmond, California 94802 2. Contact name and telephone number (should CCHMP have questions): Karla Roth, 510-242-3629 3. Summarize the status of the Stationary Source’s Safety Plan and Program (450-8.030(B)(2) (i)): The CUSA Richmond Refinery (Refinery) initial Site Safety Plan (SSP) was completed in 2003, and the most recent revision is dated September 29, 2015. The SSP was prepared in accordance with the City of Richmond Industrial Safety Ordinance (RISO), which was adopted by the Richmond City Council on January 17, 2002. 4. Summarize Safety Plan updates (i.e., brief explanation of update and corresponding date) (450-8.030(B)(2)(ii)): The site safety plan was updated in 2015. The next revision will be shared in 3Q 2018. 5. List of locations where Safety Plans are/will be available for review, including contact telephone numbers if the source will provide individuals with copies of the document (450- 8.030(B)(2)(ii)): CCHMP Office at 4585 Pacheco Boulevard, Suite 100, Martinez; Richmond Public Library at 325 Civic Center Plaza Richmond, CA 94804; and Point Richmond Public Library at 135 Washington Ave., Richmond, CA 94801. 6. Provide any additions to the annual accident history reports (i.e. updates) submitted pursuant to Section 450-8.016(E)(2) of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2)(iii)) (i.e., provide information identified in Section 450-8.016(E)(1) for all major chemical accidents or releases occurring between the last annual performance review report and the current annual performance review and evaluation submittal (12-month history)): There were no major chemical accidents or releases (“MCAR”) as defined in Section 450-8.014(h) between June 1, 2017 and June 1, 2018. 7. Summary of each Root Cause Analysis (Section 450-8.016(C)) including the status of the analysis and the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during the analysis (450-8.030(B)(2)(iv)): There were no MCAR events between June 1, 2017 and June 1, 2018, and accordingly there were no Root Cause Analyses conducted under section 450-8.016(c) during this period. 8. Summary of the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during audits, inspections, Root Cause Analyses, or Incident Investigations conducted by the Department (450-8.030(B)(2)(v)): The 2011 Cal ARP/ISO Audit had 73 ensure and consider recommendations, from which 85 total action items were created, and 85 of those action items are complete. The actions to complete the remaining items are due by the end of 2017. The final report and action plans from the 2013 Cal/ARP / Richmond ISO audit were accepted by the County and Richmond Refinery in 2015. The 2013 Cal ARP/ISO audit had 163 ensure and consider recommendations, from which 177 total action items were created, and 167 of those action items are complete. The remaining action items are in progress, some with multiyear timelines for completion. The report and action plans from the 2016 Cal ARP/Richmond ISO audit had 74 ensure and consider recommendations, from which 80 total action items were created, and 27 of those action items are complete The ensure and consider items for the 2016 audit were finalized on November 6, 2017. 68 9. Summary of inherently safer systems implemented by the source including but not limited to inventory reduction (i.e., intensification) and substitution (450-8.030(B)(2)(vi)): An example of the refinery’s use of inherently safer systems is the installation of a passive barrier on the handwheel of a quarter turn valve to prevent the inadvertent operation of the valve. Another example is the simplification of operating procedures by providing guidance as to the specific durations of time for solvent circulation during plant shutdown. 10. Summarize the enforcement actions (including Notice of Deficiencies, Audit Reports, and any actions turned over to the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office) taken with the Stationary Source pursuant to Section 450-8.028 of County Ordinance 98-48 (450- 8.030(B)(2)(vii)): There were no enforcement actions during this period under the RISO. 11. Summarize total penalties assessed as a result of enforcement of this Chapter (450-8.030(3)): No penalities have been assessed against this facility under the RISO. 12. Summarize the total fees, service charges, and other assessments collected specifically for the support of the ISO (450-8.030(B)(4)): The total CalARP Program fees for the eight facilities subject to the Industrial Safety Ordinance was $822,604. The total Industrial Safety Ordinance program fees for these eight facilities was—$578,390. (NOTE: These fees include those for the County and City of Richmond ISO facilities). 13. Summarize total personnel and personnel years utilized by the jurisdiction to directly implement or administer this Chapter (450-8.030(B)(5)): 3,828 hours were used to audit/inspect and issue reports on the Risk Management Chapter of the Industrial Safety Ordinance. 14. Copies of any comments received by the source (that may not have been received by the Department) regarding the effectiveness of the local program that raise public safety issues(450-8.030(B)(6)): No comments were received during this period regarding the effectiveness of the local program that raise public safety issues. 15. Summarize how this Chapter improves industrial safety at your stationary source (450- 8.030(B)(7)): Operating safely is one of CUSA’s core values and underpins our commitment to enhancing our process safety programs. The RISO assists CUSA in improving our process safety performance. We have worked closely with CCHMP in its implementation of the RISO and its oversight of our operations, including during its periodic reviews of our operations. Consistent with this commitment, and as part of the company’s efforts to continually improve its process safety performance, CUSA will continue to confer with the CCHMP as it refines and implements these actions. 69 16. List examples of changes made at your stationary source due to implementation of the Industrial Safety Ordinance (e.g., recommendations from PHA’s, Compliance Audits, and Incident Investigations in units not subject to CalARP regulations; recommendations from RCAs) that significantly decrease the severity or likelihood of accidental releases. In addition to the Inherently Safer Systems implemented in Question 9, CUSA has also made other changes to the facility pursuant to the RISO and beyond to decrease the severity or likelihood of accidental releases. A few examples include the following: • Changes implemented based on findings from Tier 1 and Tier 2 Incident Investigation with solutions due between June 2016 to June 2017: »11 procedures were updated to include temperature and duration limits as recommended by materials engineers. » Implemented new technology solutions to aid operators in the verification of thermal measurements within furnaces. »Reviewed process equipment in sour gas service for protection against damage mechanisms. Action items were assigned, based on material engineers’ recommendations, for upgrading metallurgy at the next opportunity. • Equipment and procedural changes implemented to reduce risks identified during PHAs, including: » Ongoing project to install vibration monitoring and shutdown systems on API Class I pumps to minimize potential loss of containment. » Continued effort to conduct procedural PHAs across refinery units to identify and mitigate potential human factors that may lead to loss of containment; with a focus on emergency, startup, and shutdown procedures. • Completed Damage Mechanism Reviews on PSM-covered equipment and piping. • Continued performing Safeguard Protection Analysis (Layers of Protection Analysis) consistent with the RISO. • sRCM (Streamlined Reliability-Centered Maintenance) continued implementing studies to set up ITPM’s (inspection, testing, and preventative maintenance tasks) refinery wide. • The Fixed Equipment Asset Strategies Project (piping) improves the refinery’s existing asset strategy, designed to prevent and mitigate loss of containment in piping systems and to describe the process for creating and maintaining these strategies. 17. Summarize the emergency response activities conducted at the source (e.g., CWS or TEN activation) in response to major chemical accidents or releases: There were no level two or three CWS or TENS activations between June 1, 2017 and June 1, 2018. 18. Common Process Safety Performance Indicators: (January 2017 to December 2017 unless otherwise noted): 70 Overdue inspection for piping and pressure vessels based on total number of circuits 2017 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Total number of circuits: 16,519* Total number of annual planned circuit inspections: 2,267*. 71 Past due PHA recommended actions, includes seismic and LCC recommended actions 2016 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Past due investigation recommended actions for API/ACC Tier 1 and Tier 2 incidents 2016 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 72 1Petroleum refineries to report publicly available refinery rate for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publicly available mean only for ACC Tier 1 (data from AFPM website: https://www.afpm.org/754-reporting/). 2Petroleum refineries to report publicly available refinery mean for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publicly available mean only for ACC Tier 1 (data from AFPM website: https:// www.afpm.org/754-reporting/). ** Refinery Industry rates or means are not publicly available at this time and will be provided when available or released. † Jan 1, 2017 thru Jun 1, 2017 API/ACC TIER 1 & TIER 2 INCIDENTS AND RATES STARTING 2011 Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 No. Tier 1 LOPC 43 01211 Incident rate for Tier 1 0.14 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.02 Refinery or Industry rate1 0.1553 0.995 0.0947 0.0925 0.1038 0.627 0.761 Refinery or Industry mean2 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** No. Tier 2 LOPC 58 63135 Incident rate for Tier 2 0.18 0.29 0.19 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.10 ං Refinery or Industry rate1 ** 0.2405 0.2531 0.2380 0.2063 ** 0.1843 Refinery or Industry mean2 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** 73 Annual Performance Review and Evaluation Submittal June 30, 2018 *Attach additional pages as necessary 1. Name and address of Stationary Source: Chemtrade West US, LLC. 525 Castro St. Richmond, CA 94801 2. Contact name and telephone number (should CCHMP have questions): Andrew Hornbeck 973-650-0257. 3. Summarize the status of the Stationary Source’s Safety Plan and Program (450-8.030(B)(2)(i)): The site Safety Plan is currently undergoing updates to reflect current procedures. The updates are due to be completed in November of 2018 and will be submitted for review upon completion. 4. Summarize Safety Plan updates (i.e., brief explanation of update and corresponding date) (450-8.030(B)(2)(ii)): No updates have occurred since the last submittal, but revisions are in progress. 5. List of locations where Safety Plans are/will be available for review, including contact telephone numbers if the source will provide individuals with copies of the document (450- 8.030(B)(2)(ii)): CCHMP Office at 4585 Pacheco Boulevard, Suite 100, Martinez; Richmond Library, 135 Washington Ave., Richmond, CA 94801. 6. Provide any additions to the annual accident history reports (i.e. updates) submitted pursuant to Section 450-8.016(E)(2) of County Ordinance 98-48 (450-8.030(B)(2)(iii)) (i.e., provide information identified in Section 450-8.016(E)(1) for all major chemical accidents or releases occurring between the last annual performance review report and the current annual performance review and evaluation submittal (12-month history)): There was one incident on January 4, 2018 that occurred since the last report. Please see the attachment for more details. 7. Summary of each Root Cause Analysis (Section 450-8.016(C)) including the status of the analysis and the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during the analysis (450-8.030(B)(2)(iv)): Please see the attachment for details 8. Summary of the status of implementation of recommendations formulated during audits, inspections, Root Cause Analyses, or Incident Investigations conducted by the Department (450-8.030(B)(2)(v)): The site is continuing to work on the Ensure and Consider action items as identified during the CCHMP July 2017 Audit. These items are tracked on the Chemtrade Action Item database for proper completion and tracking. 9. Summary of inherently safer systems implemented by the source including but not limited to inventory reduction (i.e., intensification) and substitution (450-8.030(B)(2)(vi)): Site is in the process of reviewing a heat exchanger for removal that was deemed potentially unnecessary during an ISS review. An air permit modification will be necessary to complete the removal. 74 10. Summarize the enforcement actions (including Notice of Deficiencies, Audit Reports, and any actions turned over to the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office) taken with the Stationary Source pursuant to Section 450-8.028 of County Ordinance 98-48 (450- 8.030(B)(2)(vii)): There were no enforcement actions during this period. 11. Summarize total penalties assessed as a result of enforcement of this Chapter (450-8.030(3)): No penalities have been assessed against this facility. 12. Summarize the total fees, service charges, and other assessments collected specifically for the support of the ISO (450-8.030(B)(4)): The total CalARP Program fees for the eight facilities subject to the Industrial Safety Ordinance was $822,604. The total Industrial Safety Ordinance program fees for these eight facilities was—$578,390. (NOTE: These fees include those for the County and City of Richmond ISO facilities). 13. Summarize total personnel and personnel years utilized by the jurisdiction to directly implement or administer this Chapter (450-8.030(B)(5)): 3,828 hours were used to audit/inspect and issue reports on the Risk Management Chapter of the Industrial Safety Ordinance. 14. Copies of any comments received by the source (that may not have been received by the Department) regarding the effectiveness of the local program that raise public safety issues(450-8.030(B)(6)): None. 15. Summarize how this Chapter improves industrial safety at your stationary source (450- 8.030(B)(7)): The ISO program is a great way for us to maintain our continual improvement programs and to help direct us towards the areas that need the most attention. 16. List examples of changes made at your stationary source due to implementation of the Industrial Safety Ordinance (e.g., recommendations from PHA’s, Compliance Audits, and Incident Investigations in units not subject to CalARP regulations; recommendations from RCAs) that significantly decrease the severity or likelihood of accidental releases. In the past year it has greatly increased our use of Inherently Safer Systems Analysis when reviewing incidents, conducting PHA’s and reviewing new projects. 17. Summarize the emergency response activities conducted at the source (e.g., CWS or TEN activation) in response to major chemical accidents or releases: Please see attached report. . 18. Common Process Safety Performance Indicators: 75 Overdue inspection for piping and pressure vessels based on total number of circuits 2017 Overdue Repeat January 0 February 0 March 0 April 0 May 0 June 0 July 0 August 0 September 0 October 0 November 0 December 0 Total number of circuits: 268 Total number of annual planned circuit inspections: 149 (2017) 76 Past due PHA recommended actions, includes seismic and LCC recommended actions 2017 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 Past due investigation recommended actions for API/ACC Tier 1 and Tier 2 incidents 2017 Overdue Repeat January 0 0 February 0 0 March 0 0 April 0 0 May 0 0 June 0 0 July 0 0 August 0 0 September 0 0 October 0 0 November 0 0 December 0 0 77 1Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery rate for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1. 2Petroleum refineries to report publically available refinery mean for API Tier 1 and Tier 2 classification. Chemical plants to report publically available mean only for ACC Tier 1 ). *Refinery Industry rates or means are not publicly available. API/ACC TIER 1 & TIER 2 INCIDENTS AND RATES STARTING 2011 Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 No. Tier 1 LOPC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Incident rate for Tier 1 00000000 Refinery or Industry rate1 0.1553 0.0995 0.0947 0.0925 0.1038 0.0627 Refinery or Industry mean2 * 1.49 1.30 1.38 1.55 1.01 No. Tier 2 LOPC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Incident rate for Tier 2 0 0 00 0 000 Refinery rate1 * 0.2405 0.2531 0.2380 0.2063 0.1726 Refinery mean2 * * * * 3.08 2.78 78 ATTACHMENT A 79 80 81 82 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY ORDINANCE 4585 Pacheco Blvd. Suite 100 Martinez, CA 94553 ccchazmat@hsd.cccounty.us 925-335-3200 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PROGRAMS A Division of Contra Costa Health Services RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT Grant Deed conveying 13 Contra Costa County Successor Agency (former Redevelopment Agency) owned Parcels, identified as Assessor Parcel Numbers: 147-050-043-8, 147-050-044-6, 147-050-047-9, 148-120-012-7, 148-180-047-0, 148-180-048-8, 148-180-049-6, 148-221-016-6, 148-221-030-7, 148-360-014-2, 148-360-024-1, 148-360-031-6, and 172-100-038-6 (“Parcels”), which are portions of the Iron Horse Trail Corridor from the former Redevelopment Agency to Contra Costa County, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34180 and 34181(a). (Project No. 4500-6X5489) DIRECT the Real Estate Division of the Public Works Department to cause said Grant Deed to be recorded in the office of the County Clerk-Recorder. FISCAL IMPACT: Staff costs related to the acceptance are covered by the Successor Agency Administrative budget. Other sources of funding will continue to be used to maintain the Iron Horse APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: Jewel Lopez, (925) 957-2485 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: C.172 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:ACCEPT Grant Deed conveying 13 former Redevelopment Agency owned parcels which are portions of Iron Horse Trail Corridor, District IV. FISCAL IMPACT: (CONT'D) Trail Corridor. Since the properties are being conveyed for continued public uses, there is no cost for the land. BACKGROUND: The former Redevelopment Agency is conveying 13 Parcels that are part of the Iron Horse Trail Corridor. As part of the dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency, the disposition of the Parcels to Contra Costa County (County) is necessary in order for them to retain their public use. The Contra Costa County Oversight Board adopted Resolution 2018-3 on January 24, 2018, directing the Contra Costa County Successor Agency to the Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency to convey the Parcels to the County; and the Department of Finance reviewed the Oversight Board resolution and approved the action on April 13, 2018. The County’s acceptance of the Parcels, will not cause any new effects on the physical environment. The June 11, 2019 Board Agenda also includes a Notice of Exemption prepared by the Department of Conservation and Development under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article 5, Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Parcels will not retain the public use of the Iron Horse Trail Corridor if they are not conveyed to another public agency. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Iron Horse Corridor is used for bicycle and pedestrian transportation and recreational opportunities for families. Accepting the Parcels will ensure its continued public use. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Pulled to return at a future meeting ATTACHMENTS Grant Deed and Exhibits Oversight Board Resolution Department of Finance Approval RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, or designee, to pay Garland/DBS, Inc., in the amount of $787,991.20 for roofing maintenance services provided to the Public Works Department during the period July 1, 2018 through March 31, 2019, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% General Funds. BACKGROUND: Garland/DBS, Inc. provided roofing maintenance services for Public Works on the County buildings located at 50 Douglas Drive and 2425 Bisso Lane. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Diana Oyler (925) 313-2122 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C.173 To:Board of Supervisors From:Brian M. Balbas, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Payments for Services provided by the Garland Company BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The contract with Garland/DBS, Inc. has expired and it is entitled to payment for the reasonable value of its services under the equitable relief theory of quantum meruit. That theory provides that where a person has been asked to provide services without a valid contract, and the provider does so to the benefit of the recipient, the provider is entitled to recover the reasonable value of those services. Therefore, Public Works is legally obligated to reimburse Garland/DBS, Inc. for the reasonable value of the services it provided. Since Garland/DBS, Inc. performed services at the request of Public Works and with the full expectation and understanding that it would receive payment for those services, Public Works recommends that the Board authorize the Auditor-Controller to issue a payment in the amount of $787,991.20. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The service provider will not be paid for services rendered to Public Works. RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE amended Bylaws for the North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee, as recommended by the Committee (Exhibit A). FISCAL IMPACT: No impact to the County General Fund. BACKGROUND: The Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee was established as a result of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the West Contra Costa Sanitary Landfill Bulk Materials Processing Center (BMPC) project that was approved in 2004. In July 2004, the City of Richmond and Contra Costa County entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreeing to jointly administer Mitigation Fee monies collected from the BMPC for the benefit of the incorporated and unincorporated North Richmond area. The MOU also defines the composition of the committee responsible for developing recommendations for expenditures of the Mitigation Fee. The North Richmond Waste and Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee (Committee) was formed in December 2005 pursuant to the terms of the MOU for the specific purpose of preparing recommended two-year Expenditure Plans. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Justin Sullivan (925)674-7812 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C.174 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Amend Bylaws for the North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) These Expenditure Plans provide a means to jointly administer the Mitigation Fee funding for the benefit of the host community, as described in the EIR. The MOU was subsequently amended to specify that the Committee would recommend spending plans on an annual fiscal year cycle. At their meeting in February 2008, the Committee approved recommended Bylaws, which outlined the objective, structure and operations of the Committee. The Amended Committee Bylaws now recommended for approval by the County Board of Supervisors (Exhibit A) were approved by the Committee in May 2017. The recommended amendments to the Bylaws clarify the following: 1. Committee shall provide the City and the County recommended Expenditure Plans describing allowable activities (strategies) and associated budgets on an annual cycle, 2. Expenditure Plans shall govern the use of funding for each applicable fiscal year cycle, 3. The Committee’s authority and role is based on the MOU approved in 2004 and all suggested allocations of Mitigation Fee funding shall be consistent with the purposes specified in the MOU, the associated EIR, and applicable use permits approved by the City and County, and 4. Other minor clarifications and general updates related to Brown act requirements and the County’s Better Government Ordinance. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the amended Committee Bylaws are not approved, the original Bylaws would remain in effect. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A: Amended Bylaws Amended Bylaws (Mark-up Version) AMENDED BYLAWS NORTH RICHMOND WASTE & RECOVERY MITIGATION FEE JOINT EXPENDITURE PLANNING COMMITTEE With consensus of the North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee, these Bylaws were submitted and approved by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and Richmond City Council on April 1, 2008. Amendments proposed by the Committee in June 2017 for consideration and approval. I. Purpose & Objectives of the Committee The purpose of the Committee is to provide the City and County with recommended spending plans (Expenditure Plans) describing allowable activities (Strategies) and associated budget allocations to be funded with North Richmond Mitigation Fees during each Expenditure Plan cycle. Each Expenditure Plan shall govern use of funding on a fiscal year cycle (beginning on July 1st and ending on June 30th of each year), providing the City and County with the authority to utilize allocated funding amounts for actual expenditures directly resulting from allowable activities that are performed or conducted during the applicable fiscal year. Committee recommended Expenditure Plans are to be presented to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and the Richmond City Council for final approval. This Expenditure Plan process provides the means for the County and City to jointly administer the Mitigation Fee funding for the benefit of both the unincorporated and incorporated areas of North Richmond. The Committee’s advisory authority and role is based on the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and County which was originally approved in 2004. The Committee has been charged with developing suggested allocation of Mitigation Fee funding consistent with the purposes specified in the legally-binding MOU and associated Environmental Impact Report and Use Permits approved by the City and County. The Committee is only authorized to perform the above-described advisory function designated by the City and County. All actual decision-making authority is retained by the County and the City. II. Structure and Operations of the Committee a) The Committee shall consist of seven (7) voting members: three (3) members of the Richmond City Council, one (1) member representing the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, two (2) members of the North Richmond Municipal Advisory Committee appointed by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors (both of whom must reside in the unincorporated North Richmond area), and one (1) resident from the incorporated portion of North Richmond appointed by the Richmond City Council. The Committee will be governed by regulations in the Bylaws – North Richmond Mitigation Fee Committee Page 2 of 4 Ralph M. Brown Act as well as the County’s Better Government Ordinance, to the extent appropriate and applicable. An alternate, authorized by the representative agency, may attend and vote at meetings in lieu of the appointed member as necessary. Designated alternates shall be named upon the approval of these Bylaws and on an as-needed basis thereafter. Residency requirements applicable to City and County appointees for Committee member seats shall also apply to appointments for corresponding alternates. b) Committee members missing three consecutive regular meetings within any consecutive twelve (12) month period without notifying staff or Committee Chair, after due notice by staff, shall be sufficient to constitute an automatic resignation from the Committee. Replacements shall be authorized by the representative agency. c) Each appointed Committee member or alternate may be considered for removal from the Committee at any time by his/her respective nominating agency. d) The Committee shall establish at least two (2) regularly scheduled dates and times for Committee meetings to occur each year. Meetings may also be called by the Chair, 3 or more members of the Committee or Committee staff as deemed necessary for sufficient cause. Committee staff will advise Committee members no less than two (2) weeks in advance if a regularly scheduled meeting should be cancelled due to lack of issues requiring their consideration or action. e) Establishment of standing and ad hoc committees shall be done on an as-needed basis. The establishment of standing and ad hoc committees and selection of members for these committees requires the approval of a majority of the Committee. f) The Committee shall elect a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson for terms of two years. g) Unless otherwise authorized by a majority vote of the Committee, the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson may serve no more than two consecutive full terms in each position. h) The Vice-Chairperson shall serve in the absence of the Chairperson. i) The Chairperson shall be responsible for: i) Conducting all meetings of the Committee. Bylaws – North Richmond Mitigation Fee Committee Page 3 of 4 ii) Representing the Committee (or designating a person to represent the Committee) before the Board of Supervisors and Richmond City Council, if needed. iii) Notifying Committee Staff and the Vice-Chairperson of his/her planned absence in advance of each applicable scheduled meeting. j) The Committee shall limit the amount of time each person requesting to address the Committee at a public meeting may speak to the Committee about any specific agenda item, including Public Comment, to no more than three (3) minutes each. k) Final approvals and recommendations of the Committee shall require a majority vote of the Committee members or their alternates in attendance. Committee may only vote if there is a quorum of members or their alternates in attendance (four seats). When a quorum of the Committee is not present, meetings shall be adjourned without receiving public comment or further considering or discussing of any other items on the agenda. Staff may take recommendations to the Board of Supervisors and City Council in the absence of Committee voting to approve recommendations within the time period required to facilitate timely City and County approval, which may occur if a quorum of Committee members were unable to attend and vote at a scheduled meeting. Staff recommendations shall be submitted to the City Council and Board of Supervisors for final approval if/when necessitated in order to avoid terminating funding for ongoing Strategies resulting in potential gaps in service or to address other critical matters. l) The Committee's recommendations shall normally be prepared and presented by Staff and be in the form of letters, resolutions or reports to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and Richmond City Council. m) The Committee shall have Staff submit an annual (calendar year) report in December of each year to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors which may include, but is not necessarily limited to, the Committee's activities, accomplishments, attendance, and a proposed program for the forthcoming year. The most recent annual report submitted by Staff to the County Board of Supervisors shall be provided to the Committee at the next regularly scheduled Committee meeting following annual report submittal. n) The Committee will receive primary staff support from the Contra Costa County Department of Conservation & Development. Additional staff support will also be received from the Richmond City Manager’s Office. Staff is responsible for: i) Preparing the agenda and agenda materials, distributing the agenda electronically (e-mail), posting agenda materials on the internet (www.ccccounty.us/nr) and physically posting agenda in an area visible to Bylaws – North Richmond Mitigation Fee Committee Page 4 of 4 the public at the meeting location at least 96 hours prior to scheduled meetings unless otherwise allowed by local and state requirements (e.g. emergency meeting). ii) Arranging for Committee meetings, including rescheduling meetings when required due to circumstances which include but are not limited to a lack of a quorum or anticipated absence of both the Chair and Vice-Chair. iii) Preparing meeting minutes, reports, recommendations, and resolutions for information and/or approval of the Committee as requested or needed. iv) Representing the Committee with the exception of any instances where the Chair/Vice-Chair does so. v) Being the agent of the Committee to which requests for Committee action, correspondence, information, inquiries, etc., are directed. vi) Providing or coordinating staff services to the Committee. vii) Providing relevant information to the public, the County, the City and the Committee. viii) Forwarding and taking the necessary actions on the adopted recommendations, findings, and actions of the Committee in a timely manner. o) Committee members and alternates shall certify compliance with requirements applicable to their Committee appointment upon request. III. Amendments to the Bylaws An Amendment to these bylaws will be made upon approval of the majority of the Committee and then the County Board of Supervisors and Richmond City Council. G:\Conservation\Deidra\Illegal Dumping\BMPC Mitigation Fee Committee\Bylaws-REV_May_2017_Final.doc Revised: June 2019 AMENDED BYLAWS NORTH RICHMOND WASTE & RECOVERY MITIGATION FEE JOINT EXPENDITURE PLANNING COMMITTEE With consensus of the North Richmond Waste & Recovery Mitigation Fee Joint Expenditure Planning Committee, these Bylaws were submitted and approved by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and Richmond City Council on April 1, 2008. Amendments proposed by the Committee in June 2017 for consideration and approval in June 2017. I. Purpose & Objectives of the Committee The purpose of the Committee is to prepare provide the City and County with and recommended a two-year spending plans (Expenditure Plans) describing allowable activities (Strategies) and associated budget allocations to be funded with North Richmond Mitigation Fees during each Expenditure Plan cycle. Each Expenditure Plan shall on a govern use of funding on a fiscal year cycle (beginning on July 1st and ending on June 30th of each year), providing the City and County with the authority to utilize allocated funding amounts for actual expenditures directly resulting from allowable activities that are performed or conducted during the applicable fiscal year. Committee recommended Expenditure Plans are to be presented to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and the Richmond City Council for final approval. This Expenditure Plan process provides thea means for the County and City to jointly administer the Mitigation Fee funding for the benefit of both the unincorporated and incorporated areas of North Richmond. The Committee’s advisory authority and role is based on the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and County which was originally approved in 2004. The Committee has been charged with developing suggested allocation of Mitigation Fee funding consistent with the purposes specified in the legally-binding MOU and associated Environmental Impact Report and Use Permits approved by the City and County. Other thanThe Committee is only authorized to perform the above-described advisory and coordinating functions designated by the City and Countyabove., aAll actual decision- making authority is retained by the County and the City. II. Structure and Operations of the Committee a) The Committee shall consist of seven (7) voting members: three (3) members of the Richmond City Council, one (1) member ofrepresenting the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, two (2) members of the North Richmond Municipal Advisory Committee appointed by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors (both of whom must reside in the unincorporated North Richmond area), and one Bylaws – North Richmond Mitigation Fee Committee Page 2 of 4 (1) resident from the incorporated portion of North Richmond appointed by the Richmond City Council. The Committee will be governed by regulations in the Ralph M. Brown Act as well as the County’s Better Government Ordinance, to the extent appropriate and applicable. An alternate, authorized by the representative agency, may attend and vote at meetings in lieu of the appointed member as necessary. Designated alternates shall be named upon the approval of these Bylaws and on an as-needed basis thereafter. Residency requirements applicable to City and County appointees for Committee member seats shall also apply to appointments for corresponding alternates. Alternates for North Richmond Municipal Advisory Committee appointed by the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors shall also reside in the unincorporated North Richmond area. The alternate representing the incorporated North Richmond resident appointed by the Richmond City Council shall also reside in the incorporated area of North Richmond. b) Committee members missing three consecutive regular meetings within any consecutive twelve (12) month period without notifying staff or Committee Chair, after due notice by staff, shall be sufficient to constitute an automatic resignation from the Committee. Replacements shall be authorized by the representative agency. c) Each appointed Committee member or alternate may be considered for removal from the Committee upon recommendation ofat any time by his/her respective nominating agency. d) Annually, tThe Committee shall establish at least two (2) regularly scheduled dates and times for the Committee meetings to occur each calendar year. Meetings may also be called by the Chair, 3 or more members of the Committee or Committee staff as deemed necessary for sufficient cause. Committee staff will advise Committee members no less than two (2)three weeks in advance if a regularly scheduled meeting should be cancelled due to lack of issues requiring their consideration or action. e) Establishment of standing and ad hoc committees shall be done on an as-needed basis. The establishment of standing and ad hoc committees and selection of members for these committees requires the approval of a majority of the Committee. f) The Committee shall elect a Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson for terms of two calendar years. g) Unless otherwise authorized by a majority vote of the Committee, tThe Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson may serve no more than two consecutive full terms in each position unless otherwise authorized by a majority vote of the Committee. Bylaws – North Richmond Mitigation Fee Committee Page 3 of 4 h) The Vice-Chairperson shall serve in the absence of the Chairperson. i) The Chairperson shall be responsible for: i) Conducting all meetings of the Committee. ii) Representing the Committee (or designating a person to represent the Committee) before the Board of Supervisors and Richmond City Council, if needed. iii) Notifying Committee Staff and the Vice-Chairperson of his/her planned absence in advance offrom each applicable scheduled meeting. j) The Committee shall limit the amount of time each person requesting to address the Committee at a public meeting may speak to the Committee about any specific agenda item, including Public Comment, to no more than three (3) minutes each. jk) Final approvals and recommendations of the Committee shall require a majority vote of the Committee members or their alternates in attendance. Committee may only vote if there is a quorum of members or their alternates in attendance (four4 seatsmembers) present. However, When a quorum of the Committee is not present, meetings shall be adjourned without receiving public comment or further considering or discussing of any other may review and discuss items on the agenda without a quorum present. Staff may take recommendations to the Board of Supervisors and City Council in the absence of Committee voting to approve recommendations within the time period required to facilitate timely City and County approval, which may occur if a quorum of Committee members were unable to attend and vote at aal if due solely to lack of quorum being present at scheduled meeting. Staff recommendations shall be submitted to the City Council and Board of Supervisors and for recommendations require final approval if/when necessitatedfrom City and County in order to avoid terminating funding for ongoing Strategies resulting in potential gaps in service or to address other critical matters. kl) The Committee's recommendations shall normally shall be prepared and presented by Staff and be in the form of letters, resolutions or reports to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors and Richmond City Council which shall be prepared and presented by Staff. lm) The Committee shall have Staff submit an annual (calendar year) report in December of each year to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors which may include, but is not necessarily limited to,of the Committee's activities, accomplishments, attendance, and a proposed program for the forthcoming year. Bylaws – North Richmond Mitigation Fee Committee Page 4 of 4 The most recent annual report submitted by Staff to the County Board of Supervisors shall be provided to the Committee at following the next regularly scheduled Committee meeting following annual report submittal. mn) The Committee will receive primary staff support from the Contra Costa County Community Department of Conservation & Development. Additional staff support will also be received from the Department and Richmond City Manager’s Office. Staff is responsible for: i) Preparing and distributing the agenda and agenda materials, distributing the agenda electronically (e-mail), posting agenda materials on the internet (www.ccccounty.us/nr) and physically posting agenda in an area visible to the public at the meeting location at least 96 hours prior to scheduled meetings unless otherwise allowed by local and state requirements (e.g. emergency meeting). iii) Arranging for Committee meetings, including rescheduling meetings when required due to circumstances which include but are not limited to a lack of a quorum or anticipated absence of both the Chair and Vice Chair. iiiv) Preparing meeting minutes, reports, recommendations, and resolutions for information and/or approval of the Committee as requested or needed. iv) Representing the Committee with the exception of any instances where the Chair/Vice Chair does so. vi) Being the agent of the Committee to which requests for Committee action, correspondence, information, inquiries, etc., are directed. vii) Providing or coordinating staff services to the cCommittees. viii) Providing relevant information to the public, the County, the City and the Committee. viiix) Forwarding and taking the necessary actions on the adopted recommendations, findings, and actions of the Committee within designated timetables set by Committeein a timely manner. o) Committee members and alternates shall certify compliance with requirements applicable to their Committee appointment upon request. III. Amendments to the Bylaws Bylaws – North Richmond Mitigation Fee Committee Page 5 of 4 An Amendment to these bylaws will be made upon approval of the majority of the Committee and then the County Board of Supervisors and Richmond City Council. G:\Conservation\Deidra\Illegal Dumping\BMPC Mitigation Fee Committee\Bylaws-REV_May_2017_Markup.doc RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the recommendation of the Behavioral Health Services Director to adopt the Mental Health Services Act Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for Fiscal Years 2019/20; and AUTHORIZE and DIRECT the Chair of the Board of Supervisors to send a letter to that effect to the Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) and the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission (MHSOAC) to inform DHCS and the MHSOAC of their approval of the adoption of this Plan Update. FISCAL IMPACT: Adoption of the Mental Health Services Act Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update, Fiscal Year 2019/20 assures continued MHSA funding for Fiscal Year 2019/20 in the amount of $54,751,349. BACKGROUND: Proposition 63 was passed by California voters in the November 2004 election. Now known as the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), the legislation provides public mental health funding by imposing an additional one percent tax on individual taxable income in excess of one million dollars. There are a total of five MHSA components which have been enacted out over time by the State with the goal of creating APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Matthew White M.D., 925-957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm, Windy Taylor C.175 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Mental Health Services Act (Proposition 63): Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for Fiscal Year 2019/20 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) a better program of mental health services and supports in California’s public mental health systems. The five components include: Community Services and Supports; Prevention and Early Intervention; Workforce Education and Training; Capital Facilities and Technology; and Innovation. There are multiple programs operated within each component. This is a state mandated program under Welfare & Institutions Code. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Update Summary Cover Letter Final Plan MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Cover Letter June 11, 2019 Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission 1300 17th St., Suite 1000 Sacramento, CA 95811 E-mail: mhsoac@mhsoac.ca.gov Dear Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission: Enclosed you will find the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for Fiscal Year 2019-20. Included in Appendix G is the s igned Prudent Reserve Assessment form per WIC section 5892(b)(2) and DHCS MHSUDS Information Notice 1819. Attached as separate documents are:  The Board approved Plan for Spending Reallocated Unspent Funds as of June 26, 2018 per DHCS MHSUDS Information Notice 17-059  The Innovation Annual Report for FY 2017-18  The Prevention and Early Intervention Evaluation Report for FY 2015 -18 The Draft MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for FY 2019-20 was posted for the required 30 day public review and comment period from March 29, 2019 through April 29, 2019, with a public hearing on May 1, 2019. The MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for FY 2019-20 was adopted by the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors on June 11, 2019. Should you have any questions please contact: Matthew P. White, MD, Acting Behavioral Health Services Director, 925-957-5150, or MatthewP.White@cchealth.org . Thank You. Sincerely, John Gioia, District 1 Chair of the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors Enclosure: Contra Costa County Adopted MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for FY 2019-20 MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for FY 2019-20 SUMMARY The Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update proposes to set aside $54.7 million for fiscal year 201 9-20 in order to fund over 80 programs and plan elements. The Three Year Plan Update includes $37.7 million to fund 39 programs and plan elements in the Community Services and Supports component that will serve approximately 2,000 individuals who are experie ncing a serious mental illness. The Prevention and Early Intervention component plans to set aside $9.2 million to fund 26 programs serving approximately 26,000 persons and are designed to prevent mental illness from becoming severe and debilitating. $2.2 million is budgeted for five Innovative Projects, and $2.6 million is set aside for programs to recruit, train, retain and support our public mental health workforce. Finally, our Capital Facilities/Information Technology component will utilize $3 million for project costs associated with a planned program of services for transition age youth at the county owned Oak Grove facility. An inclusive Community Program Planning Process engage d stakeholders in identifying service gaps, prioritizing community public mental health needs, and suggesting strategies to meet these needs. All identified service gaps and prioritized needs from the Community Program Planning Process are referenced and addressed in the Three Year Plan Update. FY 2017-18 performance indicators for our Full Service Partnerships and our Prevention and Early Intervention programs are included in the program description, and individual program outcomes are listed by program in Appendix B. We anticipate that the plan’s propos ed total budget spending authority will not need to be reduced in the foreseeable future , and that all MHSA programs and plan elements can be sustained at their proposed level of funding . As per direction of the California Department of Health Care Servic es (DHCS) the Three Year Plan Update includes the plan approved last year by the Board of Supervisors to spend by June 2020 funds that DHCS has identified as potentially subject to reversion back to the state. Section 5848(b) requirements of the California Welfare and Institutions Code have been fulfilled, in that the Three Year Plan Update has been publicly posted for stakeholder comment for a minimum of thirty days, and on May 1, 2019 the Mental Health Commission hosted a public hearing. All substantive comments and recommendations from this process have been included in the Three Year Plan Update, and Contra Costa Behavioral Health Administration has addressed in writing any substantive recommendations for revisions. Contra Costa County [Type the document title] [Type the document subtitle] Mental Health Services Act Plan Update Fiscal Year 2019 - 2020 Focus on What You’re Going to Do The PhotoVoice Empowerment Project coordinated by Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services Office for Consumer Empowerment in collaboration with the Committee for Social Inclusion. Funded by the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA). The PhotoVoice Empowerment Project Each year, a piece of artwork from the PhotoVoice Empowerment Project is selected to be displayed on the cover of the annual Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Plan. The PhotoVoice Empowerment Project enables consumers to produce artwork that is personal and allows for expression through poetry and narrative. The artwork speaks to the prejudice and discrimination that people with behavioral health challenges face. The PhotoVoice Empowerment Project also empowers and enables consumers with behavioral health challenges to record and reflect their community’s strengths and concerns, promote critical dialogue about personal and community issues, and reach policymakers to effect change. Special thanks to PhotoVoice participants for sharing their knowledge and artwork. The poem below accompanies the picture on the cover and was written by a PhotoVoice participant. The Broken Road This skateboard is me; the road is the path of life. I've learned that the path of life has many cracks and turns and is not easy to sk ate on, like it ’s not easy to move when you are sad. The cracks and turns of mental illness are what you have no control over. When you have a hard life you may want to stop, to just quit, but you can’t. If you stop skating when you hit the cracks, you will get nowhere. Falling into one crack might save you from falling into an even bigger one later on. You need to get back up and try again. You can’t focus on what you did; you need to focus on what you’re going to do. You need to know that every turn you take will get you closer to a smooth, straight path. A very big crack is school, where some people get picked on. Depression is what I struggle with; my ADHD makes it hard to focus. When I was younger I just thought I was stupid, but now I know what it is. I go on this path of life blind, making wrong turns everywhere, getting the label “EMO” and tend to believe there is no one to turn to. Some people fall and quit, while others get back up and prepare for another fall. The fact is, if you quit, you won’t know what to do if you come across it again. I know suicide will not be a smart path to take. In my life I know that I can’t give up; if I keep going I will eventually get to where I need to go. Most people lack knowledge; family and friends don’t accept them so they think they are alone. Just like we can learn from the cracks and turns riding our skateboards, we can learn about the positive elements of mental illness. Mental illness may seem like all it does is trip you up, but there is also a lot to learn. We need positive people to look up to. Facebook, TV, radio and other social networks teenagers often go to can be our skateboards for sharing the good side of mental illness and educating people so they understand that mental illness is a not bad thing. 1 Introduction We are pleased to present Contra Costa County Behavioral Health Services (CCBHS) Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update (Plan Update) for fiscal years 2019-20. This Plan Update starts July 1, 2019, and updates the MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan (Three Year Plan) that was initiated in July of 2017. The Three Year Plan describes programs that are funded by MHSA, what they will do, and how much money will be set aside to fund these programs. The Three Year Plan includes the components of Community Services and Supports (CSS), Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI), Innovation (INN), Workforce Education and Training (WET), and Capital Facilities/Information Technology (CF/TN). Also, the Three Year Plan describes what will be done to evaluate plan effectiveness and ensure that all MHSA funded programs meet the intent and requirements of the Mental Health Services Act. California approved Proposition 63 in November, 2004, and the Mental Health Services Act became law. The Act provides significant additional funding to the existing public mental health system, and combines prevention services with a full range of integrated services to treat the whole person. With the goal of wellness, recovery and self-sufficiency, the intent of the law is to reach out and include those most in need and those who have been traditionally underserved. Services are to be consumer driven, family focused, based in the community, culturally and linguistically competent, and integrated with other appropriate health and social services. Funding is to be provided at sufficient levels to ensure that counties can provide each child, transition age youth, adult and senior with the necessary mental health services and supports set forth in their treatment plan. Finally, the Act requires the Three Year Plan be developed with the active participation of local stakeholders in a community program planning process. Plan Updates for FY 2019-20. For FY 2019-20 $3 million will be transferred from unspent MHSA funds in the CSS component to the CF/TN component to renovate county owned facilities at 1034 Oak Grove Road in Concord to become a residential treatment facility with accompanying assertive community treatment. This in anticipation of new programming for transition age youth to be served at the site that is estimated to begin in the FY 2020-23 MHSA Three Year Plan. (Page 75) No new MHSA funded programs, projects or plan elements are being added for the four components of CSS, PEI, INN and WET, and budgeted component amounts remain the same as were projected in the FY 2017-20 Three Year Plan. Highlights of changes and updates to the Three Year Plan for FY 2019-20 include the following: • A description of 2018-19 stakeholder participation has been incorporated into the Community Program Planning Process chapter. (pages 9-34) 2 • Full Service Partnership performance indicators for FY 2017-18 are included in the program description. (page 37) • PEI performance indicators for FY 2017-18 are included in the PEI component description. (pages 53-54) • Updates on implementing several new initiatives authorized in 2017 include: o Addressing residential and assertive community treatment needs for youth at the Oak Grove facilities. (page 39) o The State initiative “No Place Like Home” (page 44) o The Special Needs Housing Program (page 44) o Mobile Crisis Response Teams in both Children’s and Adult Systems of Care (pages 37 and 50) o Expansion of the First Hope Program to serve transition age youth experiencing a first onset of psychosis (pages 57-58) o Progress on implementing the new Innovative Projects; Center for Recovery and Empowerment (CORE), and Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills Training (CBSST) (pages 66) o A Volunteer Family Support Network in the Workforce Education and Training Component (pages 69-70) o A locally administered Loan Repayment Program to address workforce shortages (page 73) • The Budget is updated to reflect estimated new funding, available funding and unspent funds for FYs 2019-20 (pages 77-78). • Program Profiles are updated to reflect outcomes for FY 2017-18 for each MHSA funded program (Appendix B). 3 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Vision .............................................................................................................................. 5 Needs Assessment ......................................................................................................... 7 The Community Program Planning Process ................................................................... 9 The Plan ........................................................................................................................ 36 Community Services and Supports ............................................................................... 36 Prevention and Early Intervention ................................................................................. 53 Innovation ...................................................................................................................... 65 Workforce Education and Training ................................................................................ 69 Capital Facilities/Information Technology ...................................................................... 75 The Budget .................................................................................................................... 77 Evaluating the Plan ....................................................................................................... 79 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... 81 Appendices Mental Health Services Maps…………………………………………………………….... A-1 Program and Plan Element Profiles………….…………………...……………….……… B-1 Glossary……………………………………………..…………………………………….…. C-1 Certifications……………………………………………...………………………….……… D-1 Funding Summaries…………………………………………..……..……………………… E-1 Public Comment and Hearing…………………………………………..…………………. F-1 Board Resolution……………………………………………………………..…………...... G-1 Note. The Program and Plan Element Profiles and the Glossary sections are included in the Appendices to provide more information regarding a specific program or plan element, and to assist in better understanding terms that are used. 4 (This page left intentionally blank) 5 Vision The Mental Health Services Act serves as a catalyst for the creation of a framework that calls upon members of our community to work together to facilitate change and establish a culture of cooperation, participation and innovation. We recognize the need to improve services for individuals and families by addressing their complex behavioral health needs. This is an ongoing expectation. We need to continually challenge ourselves by working to improve a system that pays particular attention to individuals and families who need us the most, and may have the most difficult time accessing care. Our consumers, their families and our service providers describe mental health care that works best by highlighting the following themes: Access. Programs and care providers are most effective when they serve those with mental health needs without regard to Medi-Cal eligibility or immigration status. They provide a warm, inviting environment, and actively and successfully address the issues of transportation to and from services, wait times, availability after hours, services that are culturally and linguistically competent, and services that are performed where individuals live. Capacity. Care providers are most appreciated when they are able to take the time to determine with the individual and his or her family the level and type of care that is needed and appropriate, coordinate necessary health, mental health and ancillary resources, and then are able to take the time to successfully partner with the individual and his or her family to work through the mental health issues. Integration. Mental health care works best when health and behavioral health providers, allied service professionals, public systems such as law enforcement, education and social services, and private community and faith-based organizations work as a team. Effective services are the result of multiple services coordinated to a successful resolution. We honor this input by envisioning a system of care that supports independence, hope, and healthy lives by making accessible behavioral health services that are responsive, integrated, compassionate and respectful. Matthew P. White, M.D. Acting Behavioral Health Services Director 6 (This page left intentionally blank) 7 Needs Assessment Introduction Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services (“CCBHS”) conducted a triennial quantitative assessment of public mental health need in preparation for developing the Fiscal Year 2017-20 Mental Health Services Act (“MHSA”) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan (“Three Year Plan”). This data driven analysis complements the Community Program Planning Process (“CPPP”), where interested stakeholders provided input on priority needs and suggested strategies to meet these needs. Data was obtained to determine whether CCBHS was: a) reaching the people it is mandated to serve, b) appropriately allocating its resources to provide a full spectrum of care, and c) experiencing any significant workforce shortfalls. Benchmarks for the CCBHS target population were established for the county and county regions (East, Central, West) as well as by race/ethnicity, age group and identified gender to determine whether CCBHS was serving more or less than these benchmarks. Benchmarks for appropriate resourcing by level of mental health care, ranging from locked facilities to basic services for prevention and health maintenance, were also established to determine whether the level of funding CCBHS spent on each level met these benchmarks. Finally, all CCBHS position classifications were reviewed to determine whether any significant shortfalls existed between authorized versus filled positions, staffing demographics, and bilingual staff. Results Data analysis supports that CCBHS is serving the number of clients that approximate the estimated number of individuals requiring services, and moreover serves more eligible clients than the majority of counties in California. This is based upon prevalence estimates and penetration rates of low income children with serious emotional disturbance and adults with a serious mental illness as compared with other counties. In addition, each Contra Costa County region (West, Central, East) and demographic sub-population within the County are equitably and appropriately represented, with the exception of Asian/Pacific Islanders, Latina/os, children ages 0-5 years, and adults ages 60 and over as being slightly underrepresented in each region when compared to other sub-populations within Contra Costa County. Fiscal Year 2015-16 expenditure data indicate services were available at every level of care as defined by the Level of Care Utilization System (LOCUS/CALOCUS). However, compared to benchmarks, CCBHS overspends on the most acute level of in-patient care (Level 6), and is below the benchmark in expenditures related to programs providing high intensity community-based services (Levels 4 and 5). Workforce analysis indicates a significant shortage of psychiatry time, both in county positions as well as contract psychiatrists. Compounding the issue of filling vacant 8 psychiatrist positions is that Contra Costa County reimburses psychiatrists at a lower rate than neighboring counties. Latina/o and Asian/Pacific Islander populations are under-represented among county staff when compared to the county population. Finally, CCBHS has incrementally increased the number of bilingual staff each year, and has made available as needed phone, in-person and video interpretation services. Recommendations This quantitative needs assessment suggests attention in the following areas: • Strengthen outreach and engagement strategies for identified underserved populations across the county. o Relevant Programs/Plan Elements. PEI programs will be fully compliant with new regulations that require documenting access and linkage to mental health treatment, with outreach and engagement to those populations who have been identified as underserved (page 57). The Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) program in the Children’s System of Care will receive additional MHSA funding for staff to serve children, to include ages 0-5, who are experiencing serious emotional disturbances (page 50). The Innovative Project, Partners in Aging, will be fully implemented during this Three Year Plan, whereby clinicians and community support workers will enhance the County’s Older Adult IMPACT Program (69). • Improve capacity to assist consumers move from locked facilities to community based services. o Relevant Programs/Plan Elements. The locally administered Special Needs Housing Program will be implemented during this Three Year Plan, and will utilize MHSA dollars to provide permanent supportive housing in the community to the seriously mentally ill (pages 47-48 ). • Explore strategies to recruit and retain psychiatrists and staff representing underserved populations. o Relevant Programs/Plan Elements. For the Three Year Plan CCBHS will implement a County funded Loan Repayment Program that specifically addresses critical psychiatry shortages (page 77). Additional funding has been added to the graduate level Internship Program to strengthen the recruitment of individuals who are bilingual and/or bi-cultural, and who can reduce the disparity of race/ethnicity identification of staff with that of the population served (page 76). The full needs assessment report can be found at: http://cchealth.org/mentalhealth/mhsa/pdf/2017-0316-mhsa-assessment.pdf 9 The Community Program Planning Process Each year CCBHS utilizes a community program planning process to 1) identify issues related to mental illness that result from a lack of mental health services and supports, 2) analyze mental health needs, and 3) identify priorities and strategies to meet these mental health needs. CPAW. CCBHS continues to seek counsel from its ongoing stakeholder body, entitled the Consolidated Planning Advisory Workgroup (CPAW). Over the years CPAW members, consisting of consumers, family members, service providers and representative community members, have provided input to the Behavioral Health Services Director as each Three Year Plan and yearly Plan Update has been developed and implemented. CPAW has recommended that the Three Year Plan provide a comprehensive approach that links MHSA funded services and supports to prioritized needs, evaluates their effectiveness and fidelity to the intent of the Act, and informs future use of MHSA funds. CPAW has also recommended that each year’s Community Program Planning Process build upon and further what was learned in previous years. Thus the Three Year Plan can provide direction for continually improving not only MHSA funded services, but also influencing the County’s entire Behavioral Health Services Division. In addition, CPAW utilizes part of its monthly meeting time to be the planning and implementation resource for fielding each year’s Community Forums. Community Forums for Fiscal Year 2019-20 Three community forums were held, with stakeholders choosing a separate theme for each event: • June 21 (Concord – Central County) – Supporting Family Members • November 13 (Antioch – East County) – Serving Transition Age Youth • January 16 (Richmond – West County) – Serving Immigrant Communities Approximately 283 individuals attended these forums, and participants self-identified as the following: 20% - a consumer of mental health services 27% - a family member of a consumer of services 40% - a provider of mental health services 13% - an interested member of the community 14% - under 25 55% - age 26 – 59 31% - over 60 40% - white or Caucasian 29% - Hispanic or Latina/o 14% - black or African American 13% - Asian/Pacific Islander 3% - Native American 1% - other 10 Small Group Discussions. Participants actively discussed via small groups topical issues that were developed by CPAW representatives and an electronic survey prior to the three forums. Highlights of small group input include: Supporting Family Members - Concord • What should support look like for family members who are struggling with loved ones who are experiencing mental health challenges? o Communication is a problem. We don’t hear about events, resources or group activities that will help us; especially in East County. Suggest calendars should be posted in every doctor’s office; the NAMI newsletter should be more widely distributed to non-members. o Too many of the public services are geared toward people in crisis and not people who have a mental illness but are stable. o We as parents and caregivers need peer support for better self-care. o We have to wait too long to receive clinic services. o We need help applying for benefits, as it is too difficult, and we need help navigating the different resources needed for our loved ones. Suggest case managers for families. o More peer specialists and family partners are needed. o Fund education programs for families, such as what NAMI offers. • What outreach and engagement activities should happen to better care for underserved populations and communities? o Our service providers need to go to where underserved people are located and engage them in their own community. o Families are afraid to call 911 because they don’t want their loved ones hurt or killed. o Remove the stigma by providing more education on what mental health is and how to help. Train doctors, police, firemen, hospitals. o People with developmental disabilities have no services that address their problems that co-occur with mental illness. o Mental health needs are not appropriately addressed when receiving services for drug and alcohol abuse. o People need help to function on their own, but are not considered seriously disabled enough to be made eligible for services. o People are jailed instead of treated. o People are dropped off at Psychiatric Emergency Services, but no follow-up services are coordinated. o Youth who are developing a psychosis need early intervention before they turn to drugs and alcohol. • What should housing and homeless services look like for persons with serious mental illness? o Permanent funding is needed to subsidize the cost of renting versus what someone with a serious mental illness can afford. 11 o Mental health services need to be co-located or nearby to where persons with serious mental illness live to assist them maintain their residences. o Needs to be a better understanding on how to access and be considered for housing services and rent subsidies. o Those leaving a locked treatment facility need a safe place to live in the community that has supports available. Right now they have no place to go. o People in room and boards need more and better attention by our mental health providers. o There needs to be a more coordinated plan to enable people to move from higher levels of care (locked treatment facilities) to lower levels of care (permanent supportive housing). o Provide more beds for the seriously mentally ill. Serving Transition Age Youth – Antioch Small group discussions began with sharing community resources with each other that pertained to immigrant communities. The following topics were then discussed: • How can resources in East Contra Costa County be strengthened or better utilized to support youth? o Educate our youth on how to access services and make them more user friendly to youth. o Need trained youth peer support workers to help navigate. o There needs to be more psychiatry time out here in East County. o Need more funding for teams to wrap around youth in trouble. o Services brochure geared to youth would help. o Minorities are at an increased disadvantage to obtain needed services. o Homeless families are becoming a big problem. Schools need to have basic necessities available, and facilitate confidential dialogue regarding shelter, food, clothing needs and how to access these basic necessities. o Educate parents of young children regarding resources so that they are aware and able to use when needed. o We just need more resources out here. • How can we better support youth and families dealing with suicide and better support awareness in the community? o Provide better education on recognizing warning signs and what to do. o Can there be a better protocol around the use of a 5150 so that it is not so traumatizing to everyone. o We need more therapeutic supports on campus. o Care is incident driven and does not follow up on individual and family for long term treatment and recovery. o Issues impacting youth today are different than 20-30 years ago, such as cyberbullying. o Racially disparate treatment impacts how issues are addressed and how care is provided. o Inadequate responses to past events impacts a family/youth’s willingness to seek resources in the future. o Have more peer providers in the 18-25 age range. Need more peers to share their story. Lived experience is very important. o Provide more multi-lingual suicide prevention services, especially in Spanish 12 • What are some barriers for youth in accessing mental health? o We have not done a good job of addressing non-English speaking language needs. o Youth often do not feel comfortable confiding to family, healthcare providers. o Minority youth do not feel there is parity in opportunity and education; this compounds other general youth pressures. o There needs to be more extensive services on weekends and evenings. o Cultural pressures often do not help mental health issues. o Family values and bad communication within the family often interfere with getting help. Need to understand what “help” means to a youth. o Self-medication (drugs, alcohol) affects everybody and complicates treatment. o Bring more services to the campus, where the students are. o School staff should be better prepared to know and promote mental health resources that are off campus. o Youth are afraid that if they share they will be stigmatized or bullied. • How can we better support schools to make them a safer place? o Make sure every school has a system in place and are trained on how to respond appropriately to early warning signs. o Ask students for their input, listen, and incorporate. o Include the parents via groups to discuss current issues and environmental stressors. o Plan themed, regularly scheduled events with available resources on-site. Provide parent and youth only areas within these events. o Provide severe consequences for bullying, including social media. o Provide trauma informed training for teachers. Ensure that it is required and on their paid time. o Teachers are often not familiar with issues in the community; can escalate without awareness. o Need to consider emotional safety as well as physical safety. o More and better training for the police on appropriate responses to mental health issues that students may exhibit. • How do we better reach and engage those who are underserved to provide more culturally respectful and embracive services (For example; youth, people of color, services in other languages, supporting immigrant communities, multi-generational families, LGBTQ)? o Better inclusion is facilitated through language diversity in event announcements and information dissemination. o Better inclusion of culture through culture-focused events that celebrate diversity. o Honest, appointed representatives of diverse cultural communities drive appropriate responses and consideration of program funding. o Youth in underserved populations need availability of emotional support resources at school to address home stressors. o Faith based outreach. o Normalize mental health issues for everyone by empowering voices to be heard and react with compassion. o Providers need to be continually culturally humble and learn from the diverse groups they serve. 13 o Encourage parents of diverse backgrounds to participate in the Parent Teacher Association (PTA). In addition to small group discussion, participants prioritized areas relevant to youth where mental health service needs were indicated. These areas were developed and submitted via a survey that was conducted prior to the community forum: 1. Suicide 2. Understanding mental health/illness 3. Resources in East Contra Costa County to support mental health in youth 4. Culturally competent services available to youth 5. Support of youth and their families experiencing homelessness or who are at risk of homelessness 6. Housing 7. Bullying 8. What is helpful in time of crisis 9. Issues affecting immigrant communities 10. Barriers to mental health 11. School safety 12. Social media/electronic addiction 13. Sexual harassment/dating violence 14. Services that are relevant and appropriate for you and your child’s needs 15. Performance expectations Serving Immigrant Communities – Richmond Small group discussions began with sharing community resources with each other that pertain to immigrant communities. The following topics were then discussed: • What are some strategies to build power, safety and sustainability for immigrant communities? o Ask community members what they need versus assuming. o Facilitate family networks that can share information and support each other. o Increase funding to organizations dedicated to serve these populations and make it sustainable. o Increase staff capacity to communicate in the preferred language of immigrant communities – in person is best. o Assist these communities to develop English language proficiency. o Involve these communities in the development of resources and develop leadership. o Engage law enforcement. o Challenge service providers to integrate inclusive practices that reflect what the community needs. o Build safe places for those in fear where services can be provided. o Build relationships with foreign consulates. • Explore the role of peer support workers in this community. How may they assist with system navigation? 14 o Peer support workers build rapport with the target community. Their experience is more relatable and can better motivate others. o Don’t have to explain a lot, they understand. o Their stories of lived experience can provide hope. o Older youth can be powerful mentors to younger youth. o Can be supportive and make productive time when people are waiting for treatment. o Ensure the value of establishing trust is practiced throughout service provision. o Facilitate immigrant communities to develop their own to become peer support workers. o Ensure peer support workers from these communities are valued and respected. o Encourage volunteering from these communities. o Facilitate groups where family members can share experiences and information. o Be sure that staff are well trained, so they don’t provide wrong information. o Can assist with transportation needs. • How to better understand and access existing legal services? o Very hard to find, even online. o Provide more free information and consultation and provide after hours. o There is a real fear of calling the police when they are needed. o Need to be transparent and honest about how accessing services may affect them. o Promote and give information to churches, adult education classes. o Need to understand that existing legal resources are at capacity. o The problem is language capacity. If the language is not spoken, then they don’t get served. o Require lawyers to do pro bono work as part of their credentialing process. o Suggest establishing an immigrant empowerment center that is a one stop shop. o Locally we have the Family Justice Center and the East Bay Community Law Center. Legal Aid is at the West County Health Center on Thursday afternoons. • What can be done to address misconceptions around “safe” services that do not count when federal immigration authorities determine whether a person wanting to live in the U.S. will be a financial liability, or public charge? o Provide information in diverse languages in community open areas. o Provide public service information campaigns. More flyers in multiple languages. o Provide one stop shop services that are safe and tailored to immigrant communities. o All service providers need correct and accurate training that they can share; especially knowing “safe places” they can refer a person. 15 o Educate persons who are in positions of power. o Educate everyone about public charge and the proposed new rule making. In addition to small group discussion participants prioritized areas relevant to immigrant communities where mental health service needs were indicated. These areas were both prioritized via a survey conducted prior to the community forum, as well as during the forum via dot markers. Combining both exercises produced the following in priority order: 1. Strategies for offsetting fear/mistrust in the community 2. Peer support for immigrants 3. Need for more interpreters/translation services 4. Better understanding of existing mental health services 5. Better understanding of existing legal services 6. Re-building trust in the community 7. Understanding “sanctuary” cities and school districts in Contra Costa County 8. Addressing misconceptions around safe services – improving messaging 9. Local law enforcement versus ICE – understanding differences 10. The decrease in number of people accessing “low risk” benefits, such as healthcare, food stamps, WIC Prioritizing Identified Unmet Needs. As part of each community forum, participants were then asked to prioritize via applying dot markers the following identified unmet needs from previous years’ community program planning processes. This provides a means for evaluating perceived impact over time of implemented strategies to meet prioritized needs. Thus, service needs determined to be unmet in previous years can drop in ranking as the system successfully addresses these needs. Unmet needs are listed in order of priority as determined by forum participants, with last year’s Three Year Plan rankings provided for comparison. Current Year’s Rank Previous Year’s Rank 1. More housing and homeless services 1 2. More support for family members and loved ones of consumers 3 3. Support for peer and family partner providers 11 4. Improved response to crisis and trauma 4 5. Connecting with the right service providers in your community 5 when you need it 6. Outreach to the underserved – provide care in my community, 2 in my culture, in my language 7. Increased psychiatry time 12 8. Intervening early in psychosis 8 9. Children and youth in-patient and residential beds 9 10. Getting to and from services 7 11. Better coordination of care between providers of mental health, 6 substance use disorders, homeless services and primary care 12. Care for the homebound frail and elderly 13 13. Assistance with meaningful activity 14 14. Serve those who need it the most 10 16 Community Forums for Fiscal Year 2018-19 The theme for this year’s venue was for interested individuals to meet and dialogue with service providers located in their community; specifically, those programs funded to provide outreach and engagement to underserved areas and populations. Approximately 280 individuals attended three forums in the fall of 2017 (October 5 in Richmond – West County, October 25 in Martinez – Central County, and December 7 in Brentwood – East County), and self-identified as one or more of the following: 24% - a consumer of mental health services 23% - a family member of a consumer of services 38% - a provider of mental health services 17% - an interested member of the community Small Group Discussions. Participants actively discussed via small groups topical issues that were developed by CPAW representatives prior to the forums. Highlights of suggested strategies include: • What should housing and homeless services look like for persons with serious mental illness? o Put multi-disciplinary behavioral health teams on-site of apartment buildings specifically for persons who are homeless and seriously mentally ill. o Provide life, social skills and job coaching on site to families experiencing crises so that they do not get evicted or lose custody of their children. o Be sure to include food, clothing, health and dental care, as persons who are homeless lack these essentials. o Provide onsite child care to enable parents to work or go to school. o Link transitional housing opportunities that are time limited to permanent supportive housing. o Increase board and care facilities in the community with funding augmentation for supporting residents with mental illness. o Bring medication support to the housing sites. o Have more Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous groups available and accessible. o House the population needing conservatorship services. o Need to sort out the issue of persons being housed who are still drinking or using drugs versus those individuals needing/wanting to stay sober. o Provide Mental Health First Aid training to all non-clinical persons involved in supportive housing. o Make sure tiny housing communities (micro-pods) are connected to mental health services. o Help put supportive services higher on the political agenda for housing funding. o Push back with advocacy and education to communities who are rejecting supportive housing in their neighborhood. 17 o Gentrification is making housing costs too expensive. We can’t live or work in our community. We need strategies to offset this. o Who is in charge of the Projects? • How can care for my culture/community/age group be improved? o Dialogue with different communities to define strategies that work for them. o Stress service provider trainings that are sensitive to diverse local cultures. o Need more translators and shorten wait times. o Need more service providers who look like us, share our values, and are from the community they serve. o Access Line needs to be sensitive to the fact that some people are reluctant to share mental health symptoms and personal information over the phone. o Re-visit what is meant by terms “culture” and “community”. o There are no psychiatrists that are my color. o Need more people who speak Spanish. o Need more outreach to the African American community, especially young males. o LBGTQ youth and elderly are marginalized and need to feel safer. o People who live on the streets are their own culture and don’t get services. o Young people get discouraged because of barriers (like Medi-Cal) and wait times. o Activities for children need to be more affordable for their parents. o Better educate people who are undocumented about what mental health services are available. • What should support look like for family members who are struggling with loved ones who are experiencing mental health challenges? o Serve and support the whole family, not just the identified person experiencing mental health issues. o Families need help with what is out there, how to access services, and how to navigate through the system. o We need more volunteers that can represent the needs of my culture and community. o Support re-unification of families with their loved ones. o Increase NAMI’s Family to Family classes throughout the county. o Provide more education about mental health issues to the kids who are in school. Most families have school age children. • How can we as a community improve our response to trauma and crisis? o Need a rapid response from care providers trained to respond to trauma. o Need a recognized forum to report and vent in response to traumatic events in the community – should be manned at all times. o Provide support when people are not experiencing a crisis would help. o It is important to provide services early to avoid symptoms from becoming more severe. o We need more safe places for our youth and young adults, especially LBGTQ youth. 18 o Need a way to capture data regarding traumatic events in the community. o Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES) should utilize the entire 72 hour hold, and not release a person before they are stabilized. o Increase mental health response in schools. Collaborate better with educators. o All service providers should be trained and comfortable in asking about and responding to trauma and violence experienced by a client. o Share videos that address how to respond to trauma. o Need to advocate for more funding for survivors/victims of violence and trauma. • How can we improve access to mental health and medical services? o Improve accessibility with language providers, more information and education about local services. o Need more doctors available in my community. o Improve call system so people are not re-directed and go in circles, or put on hold for long periods so they hang up before getting help. o Better educate CCBHS Access Line staff about existing behavioral health services in the community so that they can refer callers to multiple resources. o Strengthen peer and family member support, whether paid or volunteer, to help access and navigate the system. o Persons dually diagnosed (drug/alcohol and mental health) are turned away because they don’t have the “right” diagnosis for the service provider. Broaden providers’ scope of work. o All service providers need to continually educate themselves as to the full spectrum of resources available in their community, who they serve, how to access them, and then help connect their clients to these resources. • How can providers of mental health, substance abuse disorders, homeless services and primary care better communicate and coordinate with each other? o Providers should communicate with each other using language that respects that they are dealing with people, and not just objects. o Providers shouldn’t be so rushed, and should prioritize time to collaborate with each other. o Providers should listen and share with each other when clients report problems with medications, such as not working or too strong or causing bad side effects. o Agree upon the intent and flexibility allowed in HIPAA laws and regulations (client’s right to privacy). • How do we better respond to the various transportation challenges our clients and their families face in getting to and from services? o Dedicate staff time to regularly advocate for more and better public transportation services. o Provide transportation for free when someone has no money, such as bus passes, clipper cards and BART tickets. o Provide more education on bus routes, schedules and other means of transportation, such as bike routes, and training on how to use them. o Advocate for County Connection to provide transportation services on holidays. 19 o Advocate for AC Transit’s bus schedule to expand at nights and weekends. o Advocate for all bus benches to have hang overs for waiting in bad weather. o Have the busses add stops within walking distance to key public services, such as food pantries; or add a van service specifically for this purpose • How do we prevent first psychotic episodes from becoming a lifelong debilitating illness? o A safe, supportive environment like Putnam Clubhouse helped me recover from my first psychotic episode. o Experiencing homelessness can trigger a psychotic episode. Help finding a home can prevent psychosis. o Education in schools for teachers, parents and kids regarding mental health and how and where to access resources can be de-stigmatizing, and encourage getting help before psychosis sets in. o Especially educate young people who are high functioning and appear normal to be pro-active about getting help, instead of waiting for a psychotic episode. o Recognize the prevalent influence of substance abuse on youth’s mental health, and treat both together and appropriately. • How do we best respond to seriously emotionally disturbed children and youth who need in-patient or crisis residential services? o Need more residential services for children. MHSA can provide one-time funding to establish an in-patient or residential facility. o Conduct a listening survey with families of children who may need in-patient or residential services as to what they need. o Increase staffing for mobile response teams. o Partner with law enforcement to provide a more effective, coordinated response to seriously emotionally disturbed children who are reported as at risk for being restrained. o Develop safety plans for families of at risk children. Prioritizing Identified Unmet Needs. As part of each community forum participants were then asked to prioritize via applying dot markers the following identified unmet needs from previous years’ community program planning processes. This provides a means for evaluating perceived impact over time of implemented strategies to meet prioritized needs. Thus, service needs determined to be unmet in previous years can drop in ranking as the system successfully addresses these needs. Unmet needs are listed in order of priority as determined by forum participants, with previous Three Year Plan rankings provided for comparison. 1. More housing and homeless services. (last year’s rank: 1) The chronic lack of affordable housing makes this a critical factor that affects the mental health and well-being of all individuals with limited means. However, it is especially deleterious for an individual and his/her family who are also struggling with a serious mental illness. A range of strategies that would increase housing availability include increasing transitional beds, housing vouchers, supportive housing services, permanent 20 housing units with mental health supports, staff assistance to locate and secure housing in the community, and coordination of effort between Health, Housing and Homeless Services and CCBHS. Relevant program/plan elements: Sufficient affordable housing for all consumers of CCBHS is beyond the financial means of the County’s Behavioral Health Services budget. It is estimated that up to 3,800 individuals in the County are homeless on any given night. The MHSA funded Housing Services category of the Community Services and Supports component is coordinating staff and resources with the Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division in order to improve and maximize the impact of the number of beds and housing units available, shorten wait times, and improve mental health treatment and life skills supports needed for consumers to acquire and retain housing. In anticipation of the statewide initiative “No Place Like Home,” the Board of Supervisors authorized $1.72 million be returned to the County for local administration of funds to support permanent supportive housing. In addition, an Innovative project entitled “Cognitive Behavioral Social Services Training” is planned to bring mental health care to individuals with serious mental illness in the County’s augmented board and care facilities. 2. Outreach to the underserved – provide care in my community, in my culture, in my language. (last year’s rank: 9) Focus groups underscored that mental health stigma and non-dominant culture differences continue to provide barriers to seeking and sustaining mental health care. Emphasis should continue on recruiting and retaining cultural and linguistically competent service providers, training and technical assistance emphasis on treating the whole person, and the importance of providing on-going staff training on cultural specific treatment modalities. Also, culture-specific service providers providing outreach and engagement should assist their consumers navigate all levels of service that is provided in the behavioral health system. Transition age youth, to include lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender and questioning youth, who live in at-risk environments feel particularly vulnerable to physical harassment and bullying. Stakeholders continued to emphasize MHSA’s role in funding access to all levels of service for those individuals who are poor and not Medi-Cal eligible. Relevant program/plan elements: All MHSA funded prevention and early intervention programs provide outreach and engagement to individuals and underserved populations who are at-risk for suffering the debilitating effects of serious mental illness. These programs are culture specific, and will be evaluated by how well they assist individuals from non-dominant cultures obtain the cultural and linguistically appropriate mental health care needed. The training and technical assistance category of the Workforce Education and Training component utilizes MHSA funding to sensitize service providers to the issues impacting cultural awareness and understanding, and mental health access and service delivery for underserved cultural and ethnic populations. The Needs Assessment has indicated the underrepresentation of care provider staff who 21 identify as Hispanic and Asian Pacific Islanders. Additional funds have been added to the Internship program to specifically recruit clinicians to address this underrepresentation. 3. More support for family members and loved ones of consumers. (last year’s rank: 2) Critical to successful treatment is the need for service providers to partner with family members and significant others of loved ones experiencing mental illness. Stakeholders continued to underscore the need to provide families and significant others with education and training, emotional support, and assistance with navigating the system. Relevant program/plan elements: Children’s Services utilizes family partners to actively engage families in the therapeutic process, and fields the evidence-based practices of multi-dimensional family therapy and multi-systemic therapy, where families are an integral part of the treatment response. Adult Services is expanding their family advocacy services to all three of their Adult Mental Health Clinics. In the Prevention and Early Intervention component the County provides clinicians dedicated to supporting families experiencing the juvenile justice system due to their adolescent children’s involvement with the law. Three programs provide family education designed to support healthy parenting skills. Project First Hope provides multi-family group therapy and psycho-education to intervene early in a young person’s developing psychosis. Rainbow Community Center has a family support component. The Workforce Education and Training Component funds NAMI’s Family-to-Family training, where emotional support and assistance with how to navigate the system is provided. For this Three Year Plan NAMI - Contra Costa will be funded to recruit, train and develop family support volunteers to assist, educate and help families members navigate services and enhance their capacity to participate in their loved ones’ recovery. 4. Improved response to crisis and trauma. (last year’s rank: 6) Response to crisis situations occurring in the community needs to be improved for both adults and children. Crisis response now primarily consists of psychiatric emergency services located at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC). There are few more appropriate and less costly alternatives. Relevant program/plan elements: CCBHS should be part of a quality mental health response to traumatic violence experienced by the community. CCBHS is training and certifying a number of our mental health professionals to offer Mental Health First Aid training to community groups who have a special interest in responding to trauma events. A component of the training will be strengthening the ability to identify the need for more intensive mental health care, as well as the ability to connect individuals to the right resources. Hope House, a crisis residential facility, and the Miller Wellness Center are now fully operational. CCBHS has been awarded state MHSA funding for a mobile, multi-disciplinary team for adults and older adults to partner with law enforcement to field a Mental Health Evaluation Team (MHET). Referrals are persons who have been in 22 contact with the police on numerous occasions due to psychiatric issues, and are at a high risk for hospitalization or incarceration. MHSA funds will be used to augment and expand the capacity of CCBHS clinicians to assist law enforcement jurisdictions respond to persons experiencing psychiatric crises. Seneca Family of Agencies contracts with the County as part of the Children’s Services full service partnership program, and provides a mobile response team for coordinating crisis support activities on behalf of youth and their families. Additional MHSA funding will support expanding the hours of availability of Seneca’s mobile crisis response team’s capacity to respond to children and their families when in crisis. For this Three Year Plan MHSA funds will be used to augment and expand the capacity of the Forensic Team in order to field a countywide mobile crisis response intervention for adult consumers experiencing mental health crises. 5. Connecting with the right service providers in your community when you need it. (last year’s rank: 7) Mental health and its allied providers, such as primary care, alcohol and other drug services, housing and homeless services, vocational services, educational settings, social services and the criminal justice system provide a complexity of eligibility and paperwork requirements that can be defeating. Just knowing what and where services are can be a challenge. Easy access to friendly, knowledgeable individuals who can ensure connection to appropriate services is critical. Relevant program/plan elements: Family partners are stationed at the children’s and adult County operated clinics to assist family members and their loved ones navigate services. Clinicians are stationed at adult county operated clinics to assist consumers with rapid access and connectivity to services. The Workforce Education and Training Component funds NAMI’s Family-to-Family training, where emotional support and assistance with how to navigate the system is provided. For this Three Year Plan NAMI - Contra Costa will be funded to recruit, train and develop family support volunteers to assist, educate and help families members navigate services and enhance their capacity to participate in their loved ones’ recovery. 6. Better coordination of care between providers of mental health, substance use disorders, homeless services and primary care. (last year’s rank: 5) Integrating mental health, primary care, drug and alcohol, homeless services and employment services through a coordinated, multi-disciplinary team approach has been proven effective for those consumers fortunate to have this available. Often cited by consumers and their families was the experience of being left on their own to find and coordinate services, and to understand and navigate the myriad of eligibility and paperwork issues that characterize different service systems. Also cited was the difficulty of coordinating education, social services and the criminal justice systems to act in concert with the behavioral health system. Relevant Program/Plan Elements. The Three Year Plan funds a number of multi- 23 disciplinary teams that models effective integration of service providers for select groups of clients. However, this is a system issue that affects all programs and plan elements. The chapter entitled Evaluating the Plan describes the method by which every program and plan element will be evaluated as to the degree to which it communicates effectively with its community partners. The degree to which there is successful communication, cooperation and collaboration will be addressed in each written report, with program response and plan(s) of action required where attention is needed. 7. Getting to and from services. (last year’s rank: 11) The cost of transportation and the County’s geographical challenges make access to services a continuing priority. Flexible financial assistance with both public and private transportation, training on how to use public transportation, driving individuals to and from appointments, and bringing services to where individuals are located, are all strategies needing strengthening and coordinating. Relevant program/plan elements: Transportation assets and flexible funds to assist consumers get to and from services are included in supports provided in Full Service Partnerships. MHSA purchased vehicles to augment children, adult and older adult county operated clinic transportation assets, and additional staff are being hired through MHSA funding to drive consumers to and from appointments. The Innovative Project, Overcoming Transportation Barriers, has been implemented to provide a comprehensive, multi-faceted approach to transportation needs. 8. Intervening early in psychosis. (Previous rank: 10) Teenagers and young adults experiencing a first psychotic episode are at risk for becoming lifelong consumers of the public mental health system. Evidence based practices are now available that can successfully address this population by applying an intensive multi-disciplinary, family based approach. A proposed strategy is to expand the target population now served by Project First Hope from youth at risk for experiencing a psychotic episode to include those who have experienced a “first break”. Relevant program/plan elements: The Three Year Plan now includes funding to expand Project First Hope to serve teenagers and young adults experiencing a first psychotic episode. 9. Children and youth in-patient and residential beds. (last year’s rank: 4) In-patient beds and residential services for children needing intensive psychiatric care are not available in the county, and are difficult to find outside the county. This creates a significant hardship on families who can and should be part of the treatment plan, and inappropriately strains care providers of more temporary (such as psychiatric emergency services) or less acute levels of treatment (such as Children’s’ clinics) to respond to needs they are ill equipped to address. Additional funding outside the Mental Health Services Act Fund would be needed to add this 24 resource to the County, as in-patient psychiatric hospitalization is outside the scope of MHSA. Relevant Program/Plan Elements. In response to recent state legislation CCBHS will be offering the continuum of early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment (EPSDT) services to any specialty mental health service child and young adult who needs it. The Needs Assessment has indicated that seriously emotionally disturbed children ages 0-5 are slightly underrepresented in receiving care. This additional funding will add capacity for the Children’s System of Care to serve more children ages 0-5. In addition, newly enacted Assembly Bill 403 mandates statewide reform for care provided to foster care children, to include the County’s responsibility to provide Therapeutic Foster Care (TFC) services. This expansion of care responsibility will enable the County to reduce the need for care in more restricted, locked facilities. 10. Serve those who need it the most. (last year’s rank: 13) Through MHSA funding the County has developed designated programs for individuals with serious mental illness who have been deemed to be in need of a full spectrum of services. These are described in the full service partnership category of the Community Services and Supports component. In spite of these programs, stakeholders report that a number of individuals who have been most debilitated by the effects of mental illness continue to cycle through the most costly levels of care without success. Relevant program/plan elements: In February 2015, the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors passed a resolution authorizing $2.25 million of MHSA funds to be utilized on an annual basis for providing mental health treatment as part of an assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) program. The County implements the standards of an assertive community treatment team as prescribed by Assembly Bill 1421, and thus meet the acuity level of a full service partnership. This program provides an experienced, multi-disciplinary team who provides around the clock mobile, out-of-office interventions to adults, a low participant to staff ratio, and provides the full spectrum of services, to include health, substance abuse, vocational and housing services. Persons deemed eligible for assisted outpatient treatment are served, whether they volunteer for services, or are ordered by the court to participate. 11. Support for peer and family partner providers. (last year’s rank: 7) CCBHS was acknowledged for hiring individuals who bring lived experience as consumers and/or family members of consumers. Their contributions have clearly assisted the County to move toward a more client and family member directed, recovery focused system of care. However, these individuals have noted the high incidence of turnover among their colleagues due to exacerbation of mental health issues brought on by work stressors, and lack of support for career progression. Individuals in recovery who are employed need ongoing supports that assist with career progression, and normalize respites due to relapses. Relevant program/plan elements: CCBHS has strengthened its certification 25 training for consumers who are preparing for a service provider role in the behavioral health system. Additional staff are funded to expand the SPIRIT curriculum to include preparing family members as well, provide ongoing career development and placement assistance, and develop ongoing supports for individuals with lived experience who are now working in the system. 12. Increased psychiatry time. (last year: unranked) Stakeholders reported long waiting periods before they could see a psychiatrist. This is confirmed by the quantitative workforce needs analysis that indicates a significant shortage of psychiatrists to fill authorized county and contract positions. This leads to a lack of needed psychotropic medication prescriptions, lack of time for psychiatrists to work as part of the treatment team, and a compromised ability to monitor and regulate proper dosages. Relevant program/plan elements: The MHSA Three Year Plan now has funding to implement a County funded Loan Repayment Program that specifically addresses critical psychiatry shortages. 13. Care for the homebound frail and elderly. (last year’s rank: 12) Services for older adults continue to struggle with providing effective treatment for those individuals who are homebound and suffer from multiple physical and mental impairments. Often these individuals cycle through psychiatric emergency care without resolution. Relevant program/plan elements: MHSA funds the Older Adult Program, where three multi-disciplinary teams, one for each region of the County provide mental health services to older adults in their homes, in the community, and within a clinical setting. Lifelong Medical Care is funded in the Prevention and Early Intervention component to provide services designed to support isolated older adults. The Innovative Project, Partners in Aging, trains and fields in-home peer support workers to engage older adults who are frail, homebound and suffer from mental health issues. This innovative project is being implemented in response to the Needs Assessment, where older adults have been identified as underrepresented in the client population. 14. Assistance with meaningful activity. (last year’s rank: 10) Stakeholders underscored the value of engaging in meaningful activity as an essential element of a treatment plan. Youth in high risk environments who are transitioning to adulthood were consistently noted as a high priority. For pre-vocational activities, suggested strategies include providing career guidance, assistance with eliminating barriers to employment, and assistance with educational, training and volunteer activities that improve job readiness. Stakeholders highlighted the need for better linkage to existing employment services, such as job seeking, placement and job retention assistance. For daily living skills, suggested strategies include assistance with money and benefits management, and improving health, nutrition, transportation, cooking, cleaning and home maintenance skill sets. Relevant program/plan elements: Putnam Clubhouse provides peer-based 26 programming that helps individuals develop support networks, career development skills, and the self-confidence needed to sustain stable, productive and more independent lives. The Prevention and Early Intervention programs of Contra Costa Interfaith Housing, New Leaf Collaborative, People Who Care and RYSE all have services to assist young people navigate school successfully and engage in meaningful activity. Community Forums for Fiscal Year 2017-18 Last year’s venue was to bring together by region consumers, family members, service providers and interested community members to focus on issues relevant to allocating resources for the FY 2017-20 Three Year Plan, and to solicit stakeholder participation in the implementation of new programming. Over 300 individuals attended three forums (October 6 in San Pablo, November 3 in Pleasant Hill, December 1 in Bay Point), and self-identified as one or more of the following: 23% - a consumer of mental health services 32% - a family member of a consumer of services 39% - a provider of mental health services 14% - an interested member of the community Small Group Discussions. Participants actively discussed in small groups topical issues that were developed by consumer, family member and service provider representatives before the forums. Highlights of the discussions include: • What should services in my culture look like? o Diversity is important, and cultural differences should be understood and respected in a non-judgmental way. We need to be culturally humble. A diverse mental health workforce sends a message to non-dominant cultures that differences are honored. o We are getting more immigrants who need more support in understanding our laws. o Many of our immigrants come from war torn countries and suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder. Care providers need to understand how specific cultures deal with this disorder, as a common tendency is to hide mental illness. o Suggest using non-traditional means to gain trust and acceptance, such as music, art, multi-media, and gardening. o Suggest developing a cadre of paid and volunteer care providers of the same culture to go to people’s homes, as people need to develop trust, and are often fearful of being subjected to legal action. o Youth, especially those with a non-heterosexual gender identity, are prone to bullying and are vulnerable to suicidal behavior. 27 o For African and Hispanic Americans mental health care should be family centered and/or faith based. o Clinicians should understand the ramifications of assigning a mental illness diagnosis. o We need more clinicians who speak multiple languages – we are losing them to neighboring counties because of pay disparity. o The County should be current with race/ethnicity trends, where Latina/os are moving to the West and African Americans are moving to the Eastern part of the County. o Organizations, such as the Native American Health Center, should be educating mental health providers about the various Native American cultures. o Medication prescribers need to be sensitive to potential ethnic specific reactions. o We need to ensure that translated materials and language interpreters are sensitive to and being understood by the people needing this accommodation. • How can I get housing that I can afford? o The housing market is way too expensive to enable low income people to afford rents. We need rent control. o Section 8 housing is too difficult to navigate to be a resource. o Affordable housing often means unsafe housing. o People need access to the internet and help navigating the application process. o People searching for housing often need some form of stable short-term housing. Sometimes they may need to get help cleaning up and resting at these places so they can be presentable for interviews. o The east end of the County has the fastest growing population of people not being able to afford housing, and has the least resources to help with this problem. o Suggest a clearinghouse to assist individuals and their families to find affordable housing. Need to do a better job of sharing housing opportunity information. Need a one stop shopping approach, with a single application. o More shelter beds needed, especially in the wintertime when shelters have reached maximum capacity. o Public dollars should go to non-profits with supportive housing expertise, rather than banks and developers. o More shared housing capacity should be developed, such as elders pooling resources, and families with mental health experience taking in individuals into their homes. Cities should permit “mother-in-law” units. o Re-purpose abandoned or foreclosed structures for affordable housing. o Increase the number of board and care homes. o Advocate for the Board of Supervisors to spend more dollars for housing. o Flexible funding is needed to help pay for credit checks, first/last month’s rent, move in and out costs, and other expenses to enable individuals to obtain housing. o Organizations should partner to help people acquire and keep housing. 28 • What should care look like for persons with serious mental illness who live in supportive housing? o Services should be provided on site, or have a multi-disciplinary mobile team come to the sites. Mental health, substance abuse and primary health issues should be addressed holistically and in a coordinated fashion. o Include life skills support, such as budgeting and money management, cooking, cleaning, home maintenance and conflict resolution skills in order for individuals to keep their residence. o Care providers should partner with property managers to deal with behavior issues that might threaten an individual keeping their residency. o For augmented board and cares specific attention should be given to medication regimens, if professional staff are not located on site. o Family members living off site should be welcomed and included, as appropriate, and emphasis and rules should be supportive of family reunification. o Support groups, such as twelve step, should be encouraged. o Daily meaningful activities, such as self-care regimens, hobby groups, parenting classes, field trips, gardening, site maintenance, pre-vocational activities, before and after school programs and social/cultural activities should be built in, whether at the site or arranged. o Case management should not drop off when a consumer is placed, but should complement on-site services. o Housing problems, such as bad food and bed bugs, can trigger mental health problems. o Before being discharged from psychiatric hospitals persons should have dedicated attention to preparation for living in a less restricted environment, even if it means prolonging their stay to acquire these skills and coping mechanisms. o It is important not to place supported living residences in high crime and drug environments. o Each supportive living arrangement should be built into all consumer activities. The goal of improving a consumer’s living situation should include moving out to better independent housing. o All of the above would require many more dollars allocated than is currently being budgeted. • What does help getting to and from services look like? o Services are too spread out in the County to be accessible. Many countywide services are located in central county, where public transportation is not available to the east and west ends of the County. o Using BART/buses can be daunting. Coaching to use public transportation independently would be helpful, to include coping with fears, safety concerns, and responding appropriately to bullying and discrimination. o Becoming eligible for discount passes can be difficult. Assistance in becoming eligible would be helpful, as well as the funding to be able to afford vouchers. 29 o Suggest a shuttle service that stops at common safe stops, and coordinates with people who live in close proximity to each other, and when people have health/mental health appointments. o Assist individuals connect with each other so they can ride together. o Coordinate appointment scheduling around public transportation schedules. o Explore voucher system with Uber/Lyft as a means of ride sharing door to door. Expand their business model to include minors. o Continue moving mental health care out to common safe spots, such as schools, colleges, health centers, so that care is brought closer to where consumers live. o Expand volunteer services so that drivers can transport consumers. o Advocate with transit authorities for more accessible public transportation routes and provide more benches and shelters. o Use smart phones to assist with linking to directions and public transportation availability. • Helping family members navigate mental health, medical, and alcohol and drug services – what should that look like? o These services are housed separately, have different eligibility requirements, have different treatment approaches, are poorly coordinated both within themselves and with the education, social services and criminal justice systems, and often have differing, lengthy waiting periods before treatment happens. This is overwhelming for family members. o Care providers should work together to provide a more coordinated, whole person team approach that considers and responds to all co-occurring disorders that affect a person simultaneously, to include mental illness, developmental disabilities, health issues, and drug and alcohol problems. o Funding streams for these resources should be coordinated such that eligibility does not interfere with or prevent appropriate response and treatment by care providers. o Family members of consumers should be included as part of the treatment team, with assistance provided for them to become powerful natural supports in the recovery of their loved ones. o Resources should be allocated to establish paid staff to 1) support family members to access and navigate current treatment systems, 2) develop family members with lived experience to act as subject matter experts in a volunteer capacity to educate and support other family members in understanding and best participating in the different systems of care, 3) provide outreach and education to the community to reduce stigma and discrimination pertaining to mental illness, and 4) partner with other organizations to increase community involvement and support in the care of persons with mental illness. o Support and education groups for families specific to different cultures and languages need to be increased throughout the County. o Family supports need to be developed in and by the various communities in the County, and need to be culturally and linguistically accessible to the families served, irrespective of their ability to pay. 30 o Provide a single place of contact in each region of the county for family members to obtain assistance with mobilizing treatment resources for their loved ones. • What should emotional support for family members look like? o The biggest support comes from families who have been through similar experiences and who understand what a family is going through. o Mental illness affects the entire family, so emotional support should be for everyone, including the siblings. o Families often see disturbing behavior and don’t recognize that there is a mental illness going on. Early education and awareness is key to de-stigmatizing, learning coping mechanisms and getting loved ones the help they need. When first encountering mental illness they don’t know what to do. o Learning self-care is empowering. o Most helpful is respite care for parents to have a break. o Help in understanding, accessing and navigating services is a tremendous emotional support. o It is important for people providing emotional support to families to be culturally humble and honor a family’s personal beliefs. o NAMI has perfected how to support family members and should be funded to expand this support to paid staff. Operating with only volunteers, NAMI has been limited in what they can do; especially providing family support in the east, west and southern portions of the county. o Providing NAMI funding would enable expanding outreach to families of youth and adults in the criminal justice system. o Recommend providing psychotherapy for family members who have a loved one experiencing mental illness. • How should public mental health partner with the community when violence and trauma occur? o Schools can identify children traumatized and at risk, but teachers and staff are not equipped to adequately care for the child and their family. Via wraparound funding behavioral health should partner with education on site and in the homes to provide needed mental health services. o Children under five and kids with special needs are particularly vulnerable, and are often overlooked. o Persons who are homeless are in continuous trauma. o There appears to be a recent increase in violence toward immigrants, Muslims and persons who identify themselves as lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender or who question their sexual identity or gender. There is increased fear among these individuals. o Mental health care should be extended to teachers, police, church staff, and other community organization first responders, as they are dealing with trauma as well. Working closely with the police is especially helpful. o Care should be brought to the community by staff who are trusted and culturally and linguistically responsive. Non-labeling and confidentiality are most important. 31 o Care providers who are not properly trained, ill-suited, or abuse the power of their position can do more damage than the trauma itself. o Relationships and trust should be established with community first responders before violence occurs, through training, workshops and community events. o First responders need better information regarding what mental health resources are present in their community, and how to access and navigate them. o The key role of drugs and alcohol leading to violence need to be recognized and included as part of the mental health care. o Attention should be focused on the perpetrators, in order to break the cycle of violence. o Some sort of infrastructure needs to be built such that mental health professionals can respond quickly when community trauma occurs. o Service should be provided immaterial of whether the family has insurance. o Mental health professionals should be aware and prepared to address learned desensitization, stigma of discussing feelings regarding experienced violence, and distrust of authority figures. o All behavioral health staff should stay current with the latest in trauma informed response and care. o Ending up in the County’s psychiatric in-patient ward does not help the person, and often signals a failure to prevent hospitalization. • How do we care for young people who have both mental health and alcohol and drug problems? o Currently there is no coordinated outpatient mental health and alcohol/drug treatment services for adolescents, and very limited in-patient treatment. This often leads to juvenile hall. o We should be providing all levels of care in one place, from intensive to continuing care. o First responders, such as mental health probation liaisons, delinquency boards, faith based groups and teachers trained to recognize symptoms can act as referral sources. o Should engage the whole family. Part of the therapy is education regarding addiction as being a “family disease.” Also, there is the reality of relapse when returning a youth to a family that is still using and abusing drugs and alcohol. o Successful graduates of treatment are ideal to act as peer mentors. o Best practices should be determined by the culture the youth is a part of. o Mental health and substance use disorder professionals need to be cross trained in each other’s disciplines, as well as how to work together as team. o Medi-Cal eligibility should not be a barrier, as the need in this age group is overwhelming and cuts across all levels of society. o Mental health providers should be able to bill Medi-Cal for substance use disorder treatment the same as they do for mental health disorders. o There should be a substance use disorder professional co-located at each regional mental health clinic. 32 o School district administrators should be partnered with to establish as part of the district’s educational plan curricula regarding mental health/substance use disorders and the neuropsychiatry of addiction. o Marketing and education efforts should utilize more social media modes than the current method of flyers and other hard copy materials. • How do we help people who get better move to lower levels of care? o There should be discussion of and planning for use of less acute levels of service right from the beginning, so that consumers are prepared to demonstrate higher levels of self-care as they move to lower levels of professional care. o Systems of care should be as flexible and non-judgmental as possible to reduce resistance (stigma and embarrassment) when higher levels are needed due to external factors. These setbacks, when properly handled, enable greater learning and better use of lower levels of care when the person is ready. o All of our various programs need to do a better job of coordinating care and “warm hand offs” with each other. o Mentoring plays an important role in people’s success. A single mentor with lived experience reinforces the goal of self-sufficiency and supports movement to different levels helps. o As many levels of care in one place helps. Permanent supportive housing, with many levels of care on site, is a good model. o Make sure that there is a lower level of care to go to and utilize. For example, returning to a gang as the only means for social connectivity is not helpful. o Emphasizing spirituality as part of the healing process at all levels facilitates a deeper and unified approach to wellness, and assists in seeing a level of care as a milestone, and not an end in itself. o Incorporating meaningful activity at all levels focuses on strengths, and can be built upon as one navigates care. o Varying levels of employment, from volunteering, to subsidized employment, to competitive jobs in the community can support recovery. o Recommend utilizing today’s tools of apps and social media to facilitate incorporation of self-care into daily health and mental health habits. o Teaching life and social skills at all levels also is key to the recovery process. o Inclusion and involvement of the family and other natural supports are important. o The current model of state and federal reimbursements need to be addressed in order to incentivize counties to facilitate appropriate movement of consumers to lower cost treatment based upon their recovery progress, and not on the need of the system to save money. Current Medi-Cal billing makes this difficult. • What community mental health needs and strategies would you like to discuss that have not been mentioned? o Pre-employment services need to be expanded so that people have the whole range of activities that can prepare them for employment, to include volunteer experiences and internships. These services are particularly lacking for transitional age youth. Suggest partnering with the Career Resource Centers throughout the county. 33 o Aging felons are coming out of prison after experiencing many years of trauma and do not have any place to go or any support system. o Young people experiencing a first psychotic break can receive effective treatment that enables recovery. This county needs funding to establish a first break program. o NAMI should receive financial support to support and educate families of persons with mental health issues. o The hearing impaired need mental health services. o Many immigrants and undocumented persons are now fearful and distrustful of the system. We need to provide safe spaces for them to get the care they need. o We need a substance use detoxification program in each region of the county that includes mental health treatment. o We cannot get any psychiatry time in our part of the county. o Would like one stop centers that are inclusive and inviting, such as senior centers and the Family Justice Center. o People need to have services and supports in their native language. o Children with special needs, such as learning and developmental disabilities have a hard time getting mental health services. o Money management, or benefits counseling is no longer offered and is sorely needed for consumers so that they can access and navigate financial benefits, manage their money, and not get taken advantage of. o Faith based spiritual work should be included as part of the recovery process. o Foster youth mental health services are lacking. o Youth need safe places to go where they see other youth that look like them and mental health discussions are normalized to reduce stigma and discrimination. o Expand the SPIRIT program to support internships outside of behavioral health settings. Consider internships before as well as after the classroom training. o More adequate psychiatric emergency facilities are needed. o Children out of county placements are a hardship for the family. o Parents of adult children with serious mental illness could use respite care. Summary. The community program planning process identifies current and ongoing mental health service needs, and provides direction for MHSA funded programs to address these needs. It also informs planning and evaluation efforts that can influence how and where MHSA resources can be directed in the future. The full complement of MHSA funded programs and plan elements described in this document are the result of current as well as previous community program planning processes. Thus, this year’s planning process builds upon previous ones. It is important to note that stakeholders did not restrict their input to only MHSA funded services, but addressed the entire health and behavioral health system. The MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan operates within the laws and regulations provided for the use of the Mental Health Services Act Fund. Thus, the Three Year Plan contained herein does not address all of the prioritized needs identified in the community program 34 planning process, but does provide a framework for improving existing services and implementing additional programs as funding permits. The following chapters contain programs and plan elements that are funded by the County’s MHSA Fund, and will be evaluated by how well they address the Three Year Plan’s Vision and identified needs as prioritized by the Community Program Planning Process. 35 (This page left intentionally blank) 36 The Plan Community Services and Supports Community Services and Supports is the component of the Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan that refers to service delivery systems for mental health services and supports for children and youth, transition age youth (ages 16-25), adults, and older adults (over 60). Contra Costa County Behavioral Health Services utilizes MHSA funding for the categories of Full Service Partnerships and General System Development. First approved in 2006 with an initial State appropriation of $7.1 million, Contra Costa’s budget has grown incrementally to approximately $37 million annually in commitments to programs and services under this component. The construction and direction of how and where to provide funding began with an extensive and comprehensive community program planning process whereby stakeholders were provided training in the intent and requirements of the Mental Health Services Act, actively participated in various venues to identify and prioritize community mental health needs, and developed strategies by which service delivery could grow with increasing MHSA revenues. The programs and services described below are directly derived from this initial planning process, and expanded by subsequent yearly community program planning processes, to include the plan for Fiscal Years 2017-20. Full Service Partnerships Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services both operates and contracts with mental health service providers to enter into collaborative relationships with clients, called Full Service Partnerships. Personal service coordinators develop an individualized services and support plan with each client, and, when appropriate, the client’s family to provide a full spectrum of services in the community necessary to achieve agreed upon goals. Children (0 to 18 years) diagnosed with a serious emotional disturbance, transition age youth (16 to 25 years) diagnosed with a serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness, and adults and older adults diagnosed with a serious mental illness are eligible. These services and supports include, but are not limited to, crisis intervention/stabilization services, mental health treatment, including alternative and culturally specific treatments, peer support, family education services, access to wellness and recovery centers, and assistance in accessing needed medical, substance abuse, housing, educational, social, vocational rehabilitation and other community services, as appropriate. A qualified service provider is available to respond to the client/family 24 hours a day, seven days a week to provide after-hours intervention. In order to provide the full spectrum of needed services, the County makes available a variety of services that may be provided outside the particular agency that enters into a full service partnership agreement with a client. These additional services are included here as part of providing the full spectrum of services in the Full Service Partnership category. As per statute requirements these services comprise the majority of the 37 Community Services and Supports budget. Performance Indicators. The rates of in-patient psychiatric hospitalization and psychiatric emergency service (PES) episodes for persons participating in Full Service Partnerships indicate whether Contra Costa’s FSP programs promote less utilization of higher acute and more costly care. For FY 2017-18 data was obtained for 605 participants who were served by FSP programs. Use of PES and in-patient psychiatric hospitalization was compared before and after FSP participation, with the following results: A 50.3% decrease in the number of PES episodes A 31.7% decrease in the number of in-patient psychiatric hospitalizations A 23.8% decrease in the number of in-patient psychiatric hospitalization days The following full service partnership programs are now established: Children. The Children’s Full Service Partnership Program is comprised of four elements, 1) personal services coordinators, 2) multi-dimensional family therapy for co-occurring disorders, 3) multi-systemic therapy for juvenile offenders, and 4) county operated children’s clinic staff. 1) Personal Service Coordinators. Personal service coordinators are part of a program entitled Short Term Assessment of Resources and Treatment (START). Seneca Family of Agencies contracts with the County to provide personal services coordinators, a mobile crisis response team, and three to six months of short term intensive services to stabilize the youth in their community and to connect them and their families with sustainable resources and supports. Referrals to this program are coordinated by County staff on a countywide assessment team, and services are for youth and their families who are experiencing severe stressors, such as out-of-home placement, involvement with the juvenile justice system, co-occurring disorders, or repeated presentations at the County’s Psychiatric Emergency Services. 2) Mobile Crisis Response. Additional MHSA funding supports the expansion of hours that Seneca’s mobile crisis response teams are available to respond to children and their families in crisis. This expansion began in FY 2017-18, and includes availability to all regions of the county. Seneca has two teams available from 7:00 A.M. until 10:00 P.M. with on call hours 24/7 and the ability to respond to the field during all hours if indicated and necessary. 3) Multi-dimensional Family Therapy (MDFT) for Co-occurring Disorders. Lincoln Child Center contracts with the County to provide a comprehensive and multi-dimensional family-based outpatient program for adolescents with a mental health diagnosis who are experiencing a co-occurring substance abuse issue. These youth are at high risk for continued substance abuse and other problem behaviors, such as conduct disorder and delinquency. This is an evidence based practice of weekly or twice weekly sessions conducted over a period of 4-6 months that target the youth’s interpersonal functioning, the parents’ parenting 38 practices, parent-adolescent interactions, and family communications with key social systems. 4) Multi-systemic Therapy (MST) for Juvenile Offenders. Community Options for Families and Youth (COFY) contracts with the County to provide home-based multiple therapist-family sessions over a 3-5 month period. These sessions are based on nationally recognized evidence based practices designed to decrease rates of anti-social behavior, improve school performance and interpersonal skills, and reduce out-of-home placements. The ultimate goal is to empower families to build a healthier environment through the mobilization of existing child, family and community resources. 5) Children’s Clinic Staff. County clinical specialists and family partners serve all regions of the County, and contribute a team effort to full service partnerships. Clinical specialists provide a comprehensive assessment on all youth deemed to be most seriously emotionally disturbed. The team presents treatment recommendations to the family, ensures the family receives the appropriate level of care, and family partners help families facilitate movement through the system. The Children’s Full Service Partnership Program is summarized below. Note that the total amount of these programs is funded by a combination of Medi-Cal reimbursed specialty mental health services and MHSA funds. Amounts listed are the MHSA funded portion of the total cost: Program/Plan Element County/Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 2019-20 Personal Service Coordinators Seneca Family Agencies Countywide 75 1,000,203 Multi-dimensional Family Therapy Lincoln Center Countywide 60 874,417 Multi-systemic Therapy Community Options for Family and Youth Countywide 66 650,000 Children’s Clinic Staff County Operated Countywide Support for full service partners 468,267 Total 201 $2,992,887 Transition Age Youth. Eligible youth (ages 16-25) are individuals who are diagnosed with a serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness, and experience one or more of the risk factors of homelessness, co-occurring substance abuse, exposure to trauma, repeated school failure, multiple foster care placements, and experience with the juvenile justice system. Fred Finch Youth Center is located in West County and contracts with the CCBHS to serve West and Central County. This program utilizes the assertive community 39 treatment model as modified for young adults that includes a personal service coordinator working in concert with a multi-disciplinary team of staff, including peer and family mentors, a psychiatric nurse practitioner, staff with various clinical specialties, to include co-occurring substance disorder and bilingual capacity. In addition to mobile mental health and psychiatric services the program offers a variety of services designed to promote wellness and recovery, including assistance finding housing, benefits advocacy, school and employment assistance, and support connecting with families. Youth Homes is located in East County and contracts with CCBHS to serve Central and East County. This program emphasizes the evidence based practice of integrated treatment for co-occurring disorders, where youth receive mental health and substance abuse treatment from a single treatment specialist, and multiple formats for services are available, to include individual, group, self-help and family. Oak Grove Facility. Planning and start-up funds have been set aside for this three year period to address short-term residential treatment program (STRTP) needs for transition age youth ages 15-26. Envisioned at the county facility located at 1034 Oak Grove Road in Concord is assertive community treatment (ACT) level intensive services co-located with the STRTP in order to provide voluntary community level treatment with safe and stable housing for the most vulnerable and at-risk youth who are experiencing serious mental health issues. Initial funding for 2019 is included for program and budget planning and start-up costs, with full funding budgeted for FY 2020-21. Projected one-time facility renovation costs will be transferred from unspent CSS component funds in to the CF/TN component. The Transition Age Youth Full Service Partnership Program is summarized below: Program County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Transition Age Youth Full Service Partnership Fred Finch Youth Center West and Central County 70 1,530,519 Transition Age Youth Full Service Partnership Youth Homes Central and East County 30 726,663 Residential Treatment for Youth To be determined Countywide To be determined 250,000 County support costs 31,828 Total 100 $2,539,010 Adult. Adult Full Service Partnerships provide a full range of services to adults over the age of 18 who are diagnosed with a serious mental illness, are at or below 200% of the federal poverty level, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. 40 Three contractors to the County will provide full service partnerships, and utilize a modified assertive community treatment model. This is a model of treatment made up of a multi-disciplinary mental health team, including a peer specialist, who work together to provide the majority of treatment, rehabilitation, and support services that clients use to achieve their goals. CCBHS contracts with Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center (Hume Center) to provide FSP services in the West and East regions of the County. Anka Behavioral Health takes the lead in providing full service partnership services to Central County, while Familias Unidas contracts with the County to provide the lead on full service partnerships for West County’s Hispanic population. The Adult Full Service Partnership Program is summarized below: Program/Plan Element County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Full Service Partnership Hume Center West County East County 60 50 2,006,581 Full Service Partnership Anka Behavioral Health Central County Countywide 50 839,969 Full Service Partnership Familias Unidas West County 30 226,300 Total 190 $3,072,850 Additional Services Supporting Full Service Partners. The following services are utilized by full service partners, and enable the County to provide the required full spectrum of services and supports. Adult Mental Health Clinic Support. CCBHS has dedicated clinicians at each of the three adult mental health clinics to provide support, coordination and rapid access for full service partners to health and mental health clinic services as needed and appropriate. Rapid Access Clinicians offer drop-in screening and intake appointments to clients who have been discharged from the County Hospital or Psychiatric Emergency Services but who are not open to the county mental health system of care. Rapid Access Clinicians will then refer clients to appropriate services and, when possible, follow-up with clients to ensure a linkage to services was made. If a client meets eligibility criteria for Full Service Partnership services, the Rapid Access Clinician will seek approval to refer the client to Full Service Partnership services. Clinic management act as the gatekeepers for the Full Service Partnership programs, authorizing referrals and discharges as well as providing clinical oversight to the regional Full Service Partnership programs. Full Service Partnership Liaisons provide support to the Full Service Partnership programs by assisting the programs with 41 referrals and discharges, offering clinical expertise, and helping the programs to navigate the County systems of care. Community Support Worker positions are stationed at all three adult clinics to support families of clients as they navigate and assist in the recovery of their loved ones. The Adult Mental Health Clinic Support is summarized below: Program/Plan Element County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Annual Funds Allocated FSP Support, Rapid Access County Operated West, Central, East County Support for Full Service Partners 1,696,080 Total $1,696,080 Assisted Outpatient Treatment. In February 2015, the Contra Costa Board of Supervisors passed a resolution authorizing $2.25 million of MHSA funds to be utilized on an annual basis for providing mental health treatment as part of an assisted outpatient treatment (AOT) program. The County implements the standards of an assertive community treatment team as prescribed by Assembly Bill 1421, and thus meet the acuity level of a full service partnership. This program provides an experienced, multi-disciplinary team who provides around the clock mobile, out-of-office interventions to adults, a low participant to staff ratio, and provides the full spectrum of services, to include health, substance abuse, vocational and housing services. Persons deemed eligible for assisted outpatient treatment are served, whether they volunteer for services, or are ordered by the court to participate. CCBHS contracts with Mental Health Systems, Inc. to provide the Assertive Community Treatment (ACT), while CCBHS has dedicated clinicians and administrative support within the Forensic Mental Health Clinic to 1) receive referrals in the community, 2) conduct outreach and engagement to assist a referred individual, 3) conduct the investigation and determination of whether a client meets eligibility criteria for AOT, 4) prepare Court Petitions with supporting documentation and ongoing affidavits, 5) testify in court, 6) coordinate with County Counsel, Public Defender and law enforcement jurisdictions, 7) act as liaison with ACT contractor, and 8) participate in the development of the treatment plan. The Assisted Outpatient Treatment Program is summarized in the following: Program/ Plan Element County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Assisted Outpatient Treatment Mental Health Systems, Inc. Countywide 75 2,076,181 Assisted Outpatient Treatment Clinic Support County Operated Countywide Support for Assisted Outpatient Treatment 461,747 Total 75 $2,537,928 Wellness and Recovery Centers. RI International contracts with the County to 42 provide wellness and recovery centers situated in West, Central and East County to ensure the full spectrum of mental health services is available. These centers offer peer-led recovery-oriented, rehabilitation and self-help groups that teach self-management and coping skills. The centers offer Wellness Recovery Action Planning (WRAP), physical health and nutrition education, advocacy services and training, arts and crafts, and support groups. Program/Plan Element County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Recovery and Wellness Centers RI International West, Central, East County 200 956,136 Total 200 $956,136 Hope House - Crisis Residential Program. The County contracts with Telecare to operate a recently constructed MHSA financed 16 bed residential facility. This is a voluntary, highly structured treatment program that is intended to support seriously mentally ill adults during a period of crisis and to avoid in-patient psychiatric hospitalization. It also serves consumers being discharged from the hospital and long term locked facilities that would benefit from a step-down from institutional care in order to successfully transition back into community living. Services are designed to be up to a month in duration, are recovery focused with a peer provider component, and will be able to treat co-occurring disorders, such as drug and alcohol abuse. The Crisis Residential Program is summarized below: Program County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Hope House - Crisis Residential Program Telecare Countywide 200 2,204,052 Total 200 $2,204,052 MHSA Housing Services. MHSA funded housing services supplements services provided by CCBHS and the County’s Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division, and is designed to provide affordable housing for low income adults with a serious mental illness or children with a severe emotional disorder and their families who are homeless or at imminent risk of being homeless. The annual budget from the FY 2014-17 to FY 2017-20 has been increased from an average of $5 million to over $7 million annually to reflect the increase in commitment to permanent supportive housing, as well as to keep pace with the increased cost of housing. Housing supports are comprised of five elements; 1) scattered site housing, 2) augmented board and care facilities, 3) temporary shelter beds, 4) permanent supportive housing, and 5) a centralized county operated coordination team. 1) Scattered Site Housing. Shelter, Inc. contracts with the County to provide a master leasing program, in which adults or children and their families are provided tenancy in apartments and houses throughout the County. Through a combination of self-owned units and agreements with landlords Shelter, Inc. acts 43 as the lessee to the owners and provides staff to support individuals and their families move in and maintain their homes independently. 2) Augmented Board and Care. The County contracts with a number of licensed board and care providers and facilities to provide additional funds to augment the rental amount received by the facility from the SSI rental allowance. These additional funds pay for facility staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. An individualized services agreement for each person with a serious mental illness delineates needed supplemental care, such as assistance with personal hygiene, life skills, prescribed medication, transportation to health/mental health appointments, and connection with healthy social activities. Of these 26 augmented board and care providers, seven are MHSA funded, and are facilities that augment their board and care with augmented care for the seriously mentally ill. An eighth provider, Crestwood Healing Center, has 64 augmented board and care beds in Pleasant Hill and 46 in Vallejo. In addition, Crestwood’s Pleasant Hill facility has a 16 bed Pathways program that provides clinical mental health specialty services for up to a year (with a possible six month extension) for those residents considered to be most compromised by mental health issues. 3) Temporary Shelter Beds. The County’s Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division operates a number of temporary bed facilities for adults and transitional age youth. CCBHS has a Memorandum of Understanding with the Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division that provides MHSA funding to enable individuals with a serious mental illness or a serious emotional disturbance to receive temporary emergency housing in these facilities. This agreement includes 400 bed nights per year for the Bissell Cottages and Appian House Transitional Living Programs, staff for the Calli House Youth Shelter, 23,360 bed nights for the Brookside and Concord temporary shelters, and 3,260 bed nights for the Respite Shelter in Concord. 4) Permanent Supportive Housing. Until 2016 the County participated in a specially legislated state run MHSA Housing Program through the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA). In collaboration with many community partners the County embarked on a number of one-time capitalization projects to create 56 permanent housing units for individuals with serious mental illness. These individuals receive their mental health support from CCBHS contract and county service providers. The sites include Villa Vasconcellos in Walnut Creek, Lillie Mae Jones Plaza in North Richmond, The Virginia Street Apartments in Richmond, Tabora Gardens in Antioch, Robin Lane apartments in Concord, Ohlone Garden apartments in El Cerrito, Third Avenue Apartments in Walnut Creek, Garden Park apartments in Concord, and scattered units throughout the County operated by Anka Behavioral Health. The aforementioned state run program ended in 2016, and was replaced by the 44 Special Needs Housing Program (SNHP). The Contra Costa Board of Supervisors authorized this program to be locally administered by the County’s Health, Housing and Homeless Division. The County has received $1.72 million in heretofore state level MHSA funds as the unspent balance from the previous CalHFA program. Health, Housing and Homeless Division will take the lead during this three year period to utilize these funds to add additional permanent supportive housing units for persons with serious mental illness and who are homeless, at risk for chronic homelessness, and need this level of service to maintain themselves in the community. These funds are to be used as capital funding to purchase, build or renovate housing units, and include operating subsidies, rental assistance, security deposits, utility deposits, or other move-in cost assistance. This $1.72 million was budgeted for FY 2017-18, but will be expended over the course of the Three Year Plan period that ends June, 2020. In addition, a potential for additional permanent supportive housing units has emerged during the current Three Year Plan period. In July 2016 Assembly Bill 1618, or “No Place Like Home”, was enacted to dedicate in future years $2 billion in bond proceeds throughout the State to invest in the development of permanent supportive housing for persons who are in need of mental health services and are experiencing homelessness or at risk of chronic homelessness. Local concepts for construction and/or re-purposing of residential sites are being put forth for consideration to be included in the County’s application, both competitive and non-competitive, to the state. The County will need to demonstrate how supportive mental health services will be brought to the individuals who will be residing in these units. It is anticipated that mental health care as part of these units will necessitate an augmentation of current MHSA funds for supportive housing. CCBHS will partner with the Department of Conservation and Development and the Health, Housing and Homeless Division to make recommendations to the County for the appropriate level of permanent supportive housing units to be purchased, constructed or re-purposed, the funding sources, and, upon Board of Supervisor direction, implement a fair and impartial competitive process for determining any potential developer entities. Dependent upon the number and cost of permanent supportive housing units proposed CCBHS will determine what additional level of County MHSA funds for mental health services will need to be authorized. A $220,000 placeholder in the annual supportive housing services budget has been added with stakeholder support, and will be adjusted as projects are planned and approved. 5) Coordination Team. Mental Health Housing Services Coordinator and staff work closely with the Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division staff to coordinate referrals and placements, facilitate linkages with other Contra Costa mental health programs and services, and provide contract monitoring and quality control. 45 The allocation for MHSA funded housing services is summarized below: Plan Element County/ Contract Region Served Number of MHSA beds, units budgeted MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Supportive Housing Shelter, Inc. Countywide 119 units 2,420,426 Supportive Housing Housing initiative to be determined Countywide To be determined 220,000 (estimated) Augmented Board and Care* Crestwood: Healing Center Our House Pleasant Hill Vallejo 64 beds 30 beds 1,210,356 Augmented Board and Care* Divines West County 6 beds 5,500 Augmented Board and Care* Modesto Residential Modesto 6 beds 75,570 Augmented Board and Care* Oak Hill East County 6 beds 17,309 Augmented Board and Care* Pleasant Hill Manor Central County 26 beds 98,345 Augmented Board and Care* United Family Care (Family Courtyard) West County 50 beds 481,479 Augmented Board and Care* Williams Board and Care Home West County 6 beds 33,831 Augmented Board and Care* Woodhaven Central County 4 beds 13,133 Shelter Beds County Operated Countywide 75 beds (est.) 2,048,912 Permanent Housing (CalHFFA) County Operated Countywide 50 units One time funding spent Permanent Housing (SNHP) County Operated Countywide To be determined Budgeted in FY 17-18 Coordination Team County Operated Countywide Support to Homeless Program 554,331 Total ** $7,179,112 *Augmented Board and Care facility contracts vary in negotiated daily rate, and several contracts have both realignment as well as MHSA as funding sources. Thus the budgeted amount for FY 19-20 may not match the total contract limit for the facility. Beds available and the amount of MHSA funds budgeted are projections based upon the 1) history of actual utilization of beds paid by MHSA funding, 2) history of 46 expenditures charged to MHSA, and 3) projected utilization for the upcoming year. ** It is estimated that over 700 individuals per year will receive temporary or permanent supportive housing by means of MHSA funded housing services. General System Development General System Development is the service category in which the County uses Mental Health Services Act funds to improve the County’s mental health service delivery system for all clients who experience a serious mental illness or serious emotional disturbance, and to pay for mental health services for specific groups of clients, and, when appropriate, their families. Since the Community Services and Supports component was first approved in 2006, programs and plan elements included herein have been incrementally added each year by means of the community program planning process. These services are designed to support those individuals who need services the most. Funds are now allocated in the General System Development category for the following programs and services designed to improve the overall system of care: Supporting Older Adults. There are two MHSA funded programs serving the older adult population over the age of 60, 1) Intensive Care Management, and 2) IMPACT (Improving Mood: Providing Access to Collaborative Treatment). 1) Intensive Care Management. Three multi-disciplinary teams, one for each region of the County provide mental health services to older adults in their homes, in the community, and within a clinical setting. The primary goal is to support aging in place and to improve consumers’ mental health, physical health and overall quality of life. Each multi-disciplinary team is comprised of a psychiatrist, a nurse, a clinical specialist, and a community support worker. The teams deliver a comprehensive array of care management services, linkage to primary care and community programs, advocacy, educational outreach, medication support and monitoring, and transportation assistance. 2) IMPACT. IMPACT is an evidence-based practice which provides depression treatment to older adults in a primary care setting who are experiencing co-occurring physical health impairments. The model involves short-term (8 to 12 visits) problem solving therapy and medication support, with up to one year follow-up as necessary. MHSA funded mental health clinicians are integrated into a primary treatment team. 47 The Older Adult Mental Health Program is summarized below: Program County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Intensive Care Management County Operated Countywide 237 3,265,023 IMPACT County Operated Countywide 138 442,032 Total 375 $3,707,055 Supporting Children and Young Adults. There are two programs supplemented by MHSA funding that serve children and young adults; 1) Wraparound Program, and 2) EPSDT Expansion. 1) Wraparound Program. The County’s Wraparound Program, in which children and their families receive intensive, multi-leveled treatment from the County’s three children’s mental health clinics, was augmented in 2008 by family partners and mental health specialists. Family partners are individuals with lived experience as parents of children and adults with serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness who assist families with advocacy, transportation, navigation of the service system, and offer support in the home, community, and county service sites. Family partners participate as team members with the mental health clinicians who are providing treatment to children and their families. Mental Health Specialists are non-licensed care providers who can address culture and language specific needs of families in their communities. These professionals arrange and facilitate team meetings between the family, treatment providers and allied system professionals. 2) EPSDT Expansion. Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment (EPSDT) is a federally mandated specialty mental health program that provides comprehensive and preventative services to low income children and adolescents that are conjointly involved with Children and Family Services. State realignment funds have been utilized as the up-front match for the subsequent federal reimbursement that enables the County to provide the full scope of services. This includes assessment, plan development, therapy, rehabilitation, collateral services, case management, medication support, crisis services, intensive home based services (IHBS), and Intensive Care Coordination (ICC). Recently the Department of Health Care Services has clarified that the continuum of EPSDT services are to be provided to any specialty mental health service beneficiary who needs it. In addition, newly enacted Assembly Bill 403 mandates statewide reform for care provided to foster care children, to include the County’s responsibility to provide Therapeutic Foster Care (TFC) services. This significant expansion of care responsibility, entitled Continuing Care Reform (CCR), will utilize MHSA funds as the up-front match for the subsequent federal reimbursement that enables the County to provide the full scope of services, and includes adding County mental health clinicians, family partners and 48 administrative support. The MHSA funded portion of the Children and Young Adult Programs are summarized in the following: Plan Element County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Annual Funds Allocated Wraparound Support County Operated Countywide Supports Wraparound Program 1,332,798 EPSDT Expansion County Operated Countywide Supports EPSDT Expansion 2,500,000* Total $3,832,798 * Estimated federal reimbursement is projected to offset the MHSA funded portion of the EPSDT expansion, and will be returned to the MHSA fund. Miller Wellness Center. The County has completed construction on a separate building near the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center that houses an assessment and recovery center. This county operated mental health treatment program for both children and adults is co-located with a primary care site, and is utilized to divert adults and families from the psychiatric emergency services (PES) located at the Regional Medical Center. Through a close relationship with Psychiatric Emergency Services children and adults who are evaluated at PES can quickly step down to the services at the Miller Wellness Center if they do not need hospital level of care. The Miller Wellness Center will also allow for urgent same day appointments for individuals who either are not open to the Contra Costa Behavioral Health System of Care, or have disconnected from care after previously been seen. The Miller Wellness Center is certified as a federally qualified health center, and as such, receives federal financial participation for provision of specialty mental health services. MHSA funding is utilized to supplement this staffing pattern with two community support workers to act as peer and family partner providers, and a program manager. The MHSA allocation for the Miller Wellness Center is summarized below: Plan Element County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Supporting the Miller Wellness Center County Operated Countywide Supports clients served by MWC 339,296 Total $339,296 Concord Health Center. The County’s primary care system staffs the Concord Health Center, which integrates primary and behavioral health care. Two mental health clinicians are funded by MHSA to enable a multi-disciplinary team to provide an integrated response to adults visiting the clinic for medical services who have a co-occurring mental illness. 49 The allocation for this plan element is summarized below: Plan Element County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Supporting the Concord Health Center County Operated Central County Supports clients served by Concord Health Center 295,293 Total $295,293 Liaison Staff. CCBHS partners with CCRMC to provide Community Support Worker positions to liaison with Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES) in order to assist individuals experiencing a psychiatric crisis connect with services that will support them in the community. These positions are on the CCBHS Transition Team, and schedule regular hours at PES. The allocation for the Liaison Staff are as follows: Plan Element County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Liaison Staff County Operated Countywide Supports PES 155,456 Total $155,456 Clinic Support. County positions are funded through MHSA to supplement clinical staff implementing treatment plans at the adult clinics. These positions were created in direct response to identified needs surfaced in Community Program Planning Processes. 1) Resource Planning and Management. Dedicated staff at the three adult clinics assist consumers with money management and the complexities of eligibility for Medi-Cal, Medi-Care, Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits. Money management staff are allocated for each clinic, and work with and are trained by financial specialists. 2) Transportation Support. The Community Program Planning Process identified transportation to and from clinics as a critical priority for accessing services. Toward this end one-time MHSA funds were utilized in Fiscal Years 2013-14 and 14-15 to purchase additional county vehicles to be located at the clinics. Community Support Workers, one for each adult clinic, have been added to the three clinics to be dedicated to the transporting of consumers to and from appointments. 3) Evidence Based Practices. Clinical Specialists, one for each Children’s clinic, have been added to provide training and technical assistance in adherence to the fidelity of treatment practices that have an established body of evidence that support successful outcomes. 50 The allocation for Clinic Support Staff are as follows: Plan Element County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Resource Planning and Management County Operated Countywide Clinic Support 678,088 Transportation Support County Operated Countywide Clinic Support 155,456 Evidence Based Practices County Operated Countywide Clinic Support 416,374 Total $1,249,918 Forensic Team. Clinical specialists are funded by MHSA to join a multi-disciplinary team that provides mental health services, alcohol and drug treatment, and housing services to individuals with serious mental illness who are on probation and at risk of re-offending and incarceration. These individuals were determined to be high users of psychiatric emergency services and other public resources, but very low users of the level and type of care needed. This team works very closely with the criminal justice system to assess referrals for serious mental illness, provide rapid access to a treatment plan, and work as a team to provide the appropriate mental health, substance abuse and housing services needed. Mobile Crisis Response Team. Currently the Forensic Team partners with law enforcement to field a Mental Health Evaluation Team (MHET). Funded by a state grant licensed clinicians (one for each County region) ride along with a Sherriff’s Department officer assigned to the team, and the MHET contacts individuals in the community who have been referred by various law enforcement jurisdictions. Referrals are persons who have been in contact with the police on numerous occasions due to psychiatric issues, and are at a high risk for hospitalization or incarceration. The team evaluates the contacted individual and coordinates appropriate care in order to avoid a more restrictive intervention. For this Three Year Plan MHSA funds are being used to augment and expand the capacity of the Forensic Team in order to field countywide mobile crisis response teams for adult consumers experiencing mental health crises. Mental health clinicians and community support workers will work closely with the County’s Psychiatric Emergency Services and law enforcement, if necessary, to respond to residents in crises who would be better served in their respective communities. The allocation for mental health clinicians on the Forensic Team are as follows: Plan Element County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Annual Funds Allocated Forensic Team County Operated Countywide Support to the Forensic Team 1,045,008 Total $1,045,008 51 Quality Assurance and Administrative Support. In 2008, the County first added needed positions via MHSA funding to perform various administrative support and quality assurance functions for statutory, regulatory and contractual compliance, as well as management of quality of care protocol. County staff time and funding to support the community program planning process are also included here. Utilizing the state’s allowance guide of 15% of total MHSA budget for this support element, the County’s total percentage has varied from 10% to 12% each year. County positions have been incrementally justified, authorized and added each year as the total MHSA budget has increased. Contra Costa County’s Board of Supervisors directed that the Health Services Department develop an evaluation design for the Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) program to determine the difference, if any, in program impact and cost savings to the County for individuals ordered to participate in services versus those individuals who voluntarily participate in the same level and type of service. The implementation of AOT is a three-year term project, with continuance contingent upon demonstration of the efficacy of court ordered outpatient treatment. Resource Development Associates was selected as the Principal Investigator through a competitive bid process to apply their proposed independent, objective social research design to Contra Costa’s AOT Program. The evaluation is expected to be ongoing through the Three year Plan. The following functions and positions are summarized below: 1) Quality Assurance. Function MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Medication Monitoring 246,307 Clinical Quality Management 783,138 Clerical Support 229,941 Total $1,259,386 2) Administrative Support. Function MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Program and Project Managers 1,095,482 Clinical Coordinator 128,533 Planner/Evaluators 389,432 Family Service Coordinator 93,114 Administrative and Financial Analysts 570,674 Clerical Support 238,554 Community Planning 12,731 Assisted Outpatient Treatment Evaluation 100,000 Total $2,628,520 52 Community Services and Supports (CSS) FY 19-20 Program Budget Summary Full Service Partnerships Number to be Served: 566 23,178,060 Children 2,992,887 Transition Age Youth 2,539,010 Adults 3,072,850 Adult Clinic Support 1,696,080 Assisted Outpatient Treatment 2,537,928 Wellness and Recovery Centers 956,136 Crisis Residential Center 2,204,052 MHSA Housing Services 7,179,112 General System Development 14,512,730 Older Adults 3,707,055 Children’s Wraparound, EPSDT Support 3,832,798 Miller Wellness Center 339,296 Concord Health Center 295,293 Liaison Staff 155,456 Clinic Support 1,249,918 Forensic Team 1,045,008 Quality Assurance 1,259,386 Administrative Support 2,628,520 Total $37,690,971 53 Prevention and Early Intervention Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) is the component of the Three-Year Plan that refers to services designed to prevent mental illnesses from becoming severe and disabling. This means providing outreach and engagement to increase recognition of early signs of mental illness, and intervening early in the onset of a mental illness. First approved in 2009, with an initial State appropriation of $5.5 million Contra Costa’s Prevention and Early Intervention budget has grown incrementally to approximately $9 million annually in commitments to programs and services. The construction and direction of how and where to provide funding for this component began with an extensive and comprehensive community program planning process that was similar to that conducted in 2005-06 for the Community Services and Support component. Underserved and at risk populations were researched, stakeholders actively participated in identifying and prioritizing mental health needs, and strategies were developed to meet these needs. The programs and services described below are directly derived from this initial planning process, and expanded by subsequent yearly community program planning processes, to include current year. New regulations for the PEI component went into effect on October 6, 2015. Programs in this component now focus their programming on one of the following seven PEI categories: 1) outreach for increasing recognition of early signs of mental illness; 2) prevention; 3) early intervention; 4) access and linkage to treatment; 5) improving timely access to mental health services for underserved populations; 6) stigma and discrimination reduction; 7) suicide prevention. All of the programs contained in this component help create access and linkage to mental health treatment, with an emphasis on utilizing non-stigmatizing and non-discriminatory strategies, as well as outreach and engagement to those populations who have been identified as traditionally underserved. Performance Indicators. PEI regulations also have new data reporting requirements that will enable CCBHS to report on the following performance indicators: • Outreach to Underserved Populations. Demographic data, such as age group, race/ethnicity and primary language enable an assessment of the impact of outreach and engagement efforts over time. Demographic data was reported on 25,024 individuals served in Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services’ Prevention and Early Intervention Programs for FY 2017-18. Within the seven PEI categories several programs focused their service delivery on traditionally underserved groups, such as new immigrants to this country, inner city youth, older adults, Native Americans, and persons who identify as lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender or who are questioning their sexual identity. In addition, PEI programs served a larger percentage of populations identified in the CCBHS 2016 54 quantitative Needs Assessment as underserved - Asian/Pacific Islanders, Latina/os, children ages 0-5 years, and adults ages 60 and over, as follows: Demographic sub-group % PEI clients served Asian/Pacific Islanders 5 Latina/os 39 Young Children 14 Older Adults 16 In addition, 34% of persons served in PEI programs received services in their primary language of Spanish. • Linkage to Mental Health Care. Number of people connected to care, and average duration of reported untreated mental illness enable an assessment over time of impact of programs on connecting people to mental health care. For FY 2017-18 PEI programs reported that, as a result of their referrals, 1,831 persons engaged in mental health treatment, and reported seven weeks as the average length of time between referral and mental health service implementation. PEI programs estimated an average duration of untreated mental illness of 12 weeks for persons who were referred for treatment. For the Three Year Plan for FY 2017-20 PEI programs are listed within the seven categories delineated in the PEI regulations. Outreach for Increasing Recognition of Early Signs of Mental Illness Programs in this category provide outreach to individuals with signs and symptoms of mental illness so they can recognize and respond to their own symptoms. Outreach is engaging, educating and learning from potential primary responders. Primary responders include, but are not limited to, families, employers, law enforcement, school, community service providers, primary health care, social services and faith based organizations. a. Seven programs are included in this category: 1) Asian Family Resource Center provides culturally-sensitive education and access to mental health services for immigrant Asian communities, especially the Southeast Asian and Chinese population of Contra Costa County. Staff provide outreach, medication compliance education, community integration skills, and mental health system navigation. Early intervention services are provided to those exhibiting symptoms of mental illness, and participants are assisted in actively managing their own recovery process. 2) The Counseling Options Parenting Education (COPE) Family Support Center utilizes the evidence based practices of the Positive Parenting Program to help parents develop effective skills to address common child and youth behavioral issues that can lead to serious emotional disturbances. Targeting families 55 residing in underserved communities this program delivers in English and Spanish a number of seminars, training classes and groups throughout the year. 3) First Five of Contra Costa, in partnership with the COPE Family Support Center, takes the lead in training families who have children up to the age of five. First Five also partners with the COPE Family Support Center to provide training in the Positive Parenting Program method to mental health practitioners who serve this at-risk population. 4) Contra Costa Interfaith Housing provides on-site services to formerly homeless families, all with special needs, at the Garden Park Apartments in Pleasant Hill, the Bella Monte Apartments in Bay Point, and Los Medanos Village in Pittsburg. Services include pre-school and afterschool programs, such as teen and family support groups, assistance with school preparation, and homework clubs. These services are designed to prevent serious mental illness by addressing domestic violence, substance addiction and inadequate life and parenting skills. 5) Jewish Family and Children’s Services of the East Bay provides culturally grounded, community-directed mental health education and navigation services to refugees and immigrants of all ages in the Latino, Afghan, Bosnian, Iranian and Russian communities of Central and East County. Outreach and engagement services are provided in the context of group settings and community cultural events that utilize a variety of non-office settings convenient to individuals and families. 6) The Native American Health Center provides a variety of culturally specific methods of outreach and engagement to educate Native Americans throughout the County regarding mental illness, identify those at risk for developing a serious mental illness, and help them access and navigate the human service systems in the County. Methods include an elder support group, a youth wellness group, a traditional arts group, talking circles, Positive Indian Parenting sessions, and Gatherings of Native Americans. 7) The Latina Center serves Latino parents and caregivers in West Contra Costa County by providing culturally and linguistically specific twelve-week parent education classes to high risk families utilizing the evidence based curriculum of Systematic Training for Effective Parenting (STEP). In addition, the Latina Center trains parents with lived experience to both conduct parenting education classes and to become Parent Partners who can offer mentoring, emotional support and assistance in navigating social service and mental health systems. 56 The allocation for this category is summarized in the following: Program Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Asian Family Resource Center Countywide 50 146,317 COPE Countywide 210 253,240 First Five Countywide (numbers included in COPE) 84,416 Interfaith Housing Central and East County 170 82,750 Jewish Community Services Central and East County 350 179,720 Native American Health Center Countywide 150 245,712 The Latina Center West County 300 115,177 Total 1,230 $1,107,332 Prevention Programs in this category provide activities intended to reduce risk factors for developing a potentially serious mental illness, and to increase protective factors. Risk factors may include, but are not limited to, poverty, ongoing stress, trauma, racism, social inequality, substance abuse, domestic violence, previous mental illness, prolonged isolation, and may include relapse prevention for those in recovery from a serious mental illness. a. Five programs are included in this category: 1) The Building Blocks for Kids Collaborative, located in the Iron Triangle of Richmond, train family partners from the community with lived mental health experience to reach out and engage at-risk families in activities that address family mental health challenges. Individual and group wellness activities assist participants make and implement plans of action, access community services, and integrate them into higher levels of mental health treatment as needed. 2) Vicente Continuation High School in the Martinez Unified School District provides career academies for at-risk youth that include individualized learning plans, learning projects, internships, and mental health education and counseling support. Students, school staff, parents and community partners work together on projects designed to develop leadership skills, a healthy lifestyle and pursuit of career goals. 3) People Who Care is an after school program serving the communities of Pittsburg and Bay Point that is designed to accept referrals of at-risk youth from schools, juvenile justice systems and behavioral health treatment programs. Various vocational projects are conducted both on and off the program’s premises, with selected participants receiving stipends to encourage leadership development. A clinical specialist provides emotional, social and behavioral treatment through individual and group therapy. 57 4) Putnam Clubhouse provides peer-based programming for adults throughout Contra Costa County who are in recovery from a serious mental illness. Following the internationally recognized clubhouse model this structured, work focused programming helps individuals develop support networks, career development skills, and the self-confidence needed to sustain stable, productive and more independent lives. Features of the program provide respite support to family members, peer-to-peer outreach, and special programming for transition age youth and young adults. 5) The RYSE Center provides a constellation of age-appropriate activities that enable at-risk youth in Richmond to effectively cope with the continuous presence of violence and trauma in the community and at home. These trauma informed programs and services include drop-in, recreational and structured activities across areas of health and wellness, media, arts and culture, education and career, technology, and developing youth leadership and organizing capacity. The RYSE Center facilitates a number of city and system-wide training and technical assistance events to educate the community on mental health interventions that can prevent serious mental illness as a result of trauma and violence. The allocation for this category is summarized below: Program Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Building Blocks for Kids West County 400 223,404 Vicente Central County 80 191,337 People Who Care East County 200 229,795 Putnam Clubhouse Countywide 300 600,345 RYSE West County 2,000 518,110 Total 2,980 $1,762,991 Early Intervention Early intervention provides mental health treatment for persons with a serious emotional disturbance or mental illness early in its emergence. a. The County operated First Hope Program serves youth who show early signs of psychosis, or have recently experienced a first psychotic episode. Referrals are accepted from all parts of the County, and through a comprehensive assessment process young people, ages 12-25, and their families are helped to determine whether First Hope is the best treatment to address the psychotic illness and associated disability. A multi-disciplinary team provides intensive care to the individual and their family, and consists of psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, occupational therapists and employment/education specialists. These services are based on the Portland Identification and Early Referral (PIER) Model, and consists of multi-family group therapy, psychiatric care, family psycho-education, education and employment support, and occupational therapy. The expansion of First Hope, to include serving youth experiencing a first onset of psychosis began during FY 2017- 58 18, included securing a new site to accommodate the added staff, as well as creating, hiring and training new county staff. The allocation for this program is summarized below: Program Region Served Number to be Served Yearly Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 First Hope Countywide 200 2,522,056 Total 200 $2,522,056 Access and Linkage to Treatment Programs in this category have a primary focus on screening, assessment, and connecting children and adults as early as practicable to necessary mental health care and treatment. a. Three programs are included in this category: 1) The James Morehouse Project at El Cerrito High School, a student health center that partners with community based organizations, government agencies and local universities, provides a range of youth development groups designed to increase access to mental health services for at-risk high school students. These on-campus groups address mindfulness (anger/stress management), violence and bereavement, environmental and societal factors leading to substance abuse, peer conflict mediation and immigration/acculturation. 2) STAND! Against Domestic Violence utilizes established curricula to assist youth successfully address the debilitating effects of violence occurring both at home and in teen relationships. Fifteen week support groups are held for teens throughout the County, and teachers and other school personnel are assisted with education and awareness with which to identify and address unhealthy relationships amongst teens that lead to serious mental health issues. 3) Experiencing the Juvenile Justice System. Within the County operated Children’s Services five mental health clinicians support families who are experiencing the juvenile justice system due to their adolescent children’s involvement with the law. Three clinicians are out-stationed at juvenile probation offices, and two clinicians work with the Oren Allen Youth Ranch. The clinicians provide direct short-term therapy and coordinate appropriate linkages to services and supports as youth transition back into their communities. The allocation for this category is summarized in the following: Total 1,350 $1,004,498 Program Region Served Number to be Served Yearly Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 James Morehouse Project West County 300 105,983 STAND! Against Domestic Violence Countywide 750 138,136 Experiencing Juvenile Justice Countywide 300 760,379 59 Improving Timely Access to Mental Health Services for Underserved Populations. Programs in this category provide mental health services as early as possible for individuals and their families from an underserved population. Underserved means not having access due to challenges in the identification of mental health needs, limited language access, or lack of culturally appropriate mental health services. Programs in this category feature cultural and language appropriate services in convenient, accessible settings. a. Six programs are included in this category: 1) The Center for Human Development fields two programs under this category. The first is an African American wellness group that serves the Bay Point community in East Contra Costa County. Services consist of culturally appropriate education on mental health issues through support groups and workshops. Participants at risk for developing a serious mental illness receive assistance with referral and access to County mental health services. The second program provides mental health education and supports for LGBTQ youth and their supports in East County to work toward more inclusion and acceptance within schools and in the community. 2) The Child Abuse Prevention Council of Contra Costa provides a 23 week curriculum designed to build new parenting skills and alter old behavioral patterns, and is intended to strengthen families and support the healthy development of their children. The program is designed to meet the needs of Spanish speaking families in East and Central Counties. 3) La Clinica de la Raza reaches out to at-risk Latina/os in Central and East County to provide behavioral health assessments and culturally appropriate early intervention services to address symptoms of mental illness brought about by trauma, domestic violence and substance abuse. Clinical staff also provide psycho-educational groups that address the stress factors that lead to serious mental illness. 4) Lao Family Community Development provides a comprehensive and culturally sensitive integrated system of care for Asian and Southeast Asian adults and families in West Contra Costa County. Staff provide comprehensive case management services, to include home visits, counseling, parenting classes, and assistance accessing employment, financial management, housing, and other service both within and outside the agency. 5) Lifelong Medical Care provides isolated older adults in West County opportunities for social engagement and access to mental health and social services. A variety of group and one-on-one approaches are employed in three housing developments to engage frail, older adults in social activities, provide screening for depression and other mental and medical health issues, and linking them to appropriate services. 6) Rainbow Community Center provides a community based social support program designed to decrease isolation, depression and suicidal ideation among 60 members who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or who question their sexual identity. Key activities include reaching out to the community in order to engage those individuals who are at risk, providing mental health support groups that address isolation and stigma and promote wellness and resiliency, and providing clinical mental health treatment and intervention for those individuals who are identified as seriously mentally ill. The allocation for this category is summarized below: Program Region Served Number to be Served Yearly Funds Allocated for FY 2019-20 Child Abuse Prevention Council Central and East County 120 128,862 Center for Human Development East County 230 150,785 La Clinica de la Raza Central and East County 3,750 288,975 Lao Family Community Development West County 120 196,128 Lifelong Medical Care West County 115 134,710 Rainbow Community Center Countywide 1,125 782,143 Total 5,460 $1,681,603 Stigma and Discrimination Reduction Activities in this category are designed to 1) reduce negative feelings, attitudes, beliefs, perceptions, stereotypes and/or discrimination related to having a mental illness, 2) increase acceptance, dignity, inclusion and equity for individuals with mental illness and their families, and 3) advocate for services that are culturally congruent with the values of the population for whom changes, attitudes, knowledge and behavior are intended. a. The County operated Office for Consumer Empowerment (OCE) provides leadership and staff support to a number of initiatives designed to reduce stigma and discrimination, develop leadership and advocacy skills among consumers of behavioral health services, support the role of peers as providers, and encourage consumers to actively participate in the planning and evaluation of MHSA funded services. Staff from the OCE support the following activities designed to educate the community in order to raise awareness of the stigma that can accompany mental illness. 1) The PhotoVoice Empowerment Project enables consumers to produce artwork that speaks to the prejudice and discrimination that people with behavioral health challenges face. PhotoVoice’s vision is to enable people to record and reflect their community’s strengths and concerns, promote critical dialogue about personal and community issues, and to reach policymakers to effect change. 2) The Wellness Recovery Education for Acceptance, Choice and Hope (WREACH) Speakers’ Bureau forms connections between people in the community and 61 people with lived mental health and co-occurring experiences, using face to face contact by providing stories of recovery and resiliency and current information on health treatment and supports. Other related activities include producing videos, public service announcements and educational materials. 3) The OCE facilitates Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) groups by providing certified leaders and conducting classes throughout the County. Staff employ the evidence-based WRAP system in enhancing the efforts of consumers to promote and advocate for their own wellness. OCE also supports a writers’ group in partnership with the Contra Costa affiliate of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI). 4) The Committee for Social Inclusion is an ongoing alliance of committee members that work together to promote social inclusion of persons who receive behavioral health services. The Committee is project based, and projects are designed to increase participation of consumers and family members in the planning, implementation and delivery of services. Current efforts are supporting the integration of mental health and alcohol and other drug services within the Behavioral Health Services Division. In addition, OCE staff assist and support consumers and family members in participating in the various planning committees and sub-committees, Mental Health Commission meetings, community forums, and other opportunities to participate in planning processes. 5) Through the Each Mind Matters initiative California Mental Health Services Authority (CalMHSA) will provide technical assistance to encourage the County’s integration of available statewide resources on stigma and discrimination reduction and suicide prevention. For FY 2017-20 CCBHS partners via Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with CalMHSA to link county level stigma and discrimination reduction efforts with statewide social marketing programs. This linkage will expand the County’s capacity via language specific materials, social media, and subject matter consultation with regional and state experts to reach diverse underserved communities, such as Hispanic, African American, Asian Pacific Islander, LGBTQ, Native American and immigrant communities. Primary focus will be to reach Spanish speaking Latina/o communities via social media and materials adapted specifically for this population. The allocation for stigma and discrimination efforts are summarized in the following: Program County/Contract Region Served Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 OCE County Operated Countywide 412,931 CalMHSA MOU Countywide 78,000 Total $490,931 Suicide Prevention a. There are three plan elements that support the County’s efforts to reduce the number of suicides in Contra Costa County; 1) augmenting the Contra Costa Crisis Center, 2) dedicating a clinical specialist to support the County’s suicide prevention efforts, and 3) supporting a suicide prevention committee. 62 1) The Contra Costa Crisis Center provides services to prevent suicides by operating a certified twenty four hour suicide prevention hotline. The hotline connects with people when they are most vulnerable and at risk for suicide, enhances safety, and builds a bridge to community resources. Staff conduct a lethality assessment on each call, provide support and intervention for the person in crisis, and make follow-up calls (with the caller’s consent) to persons who are at medium to high risk of suicide. MHSA funds enable additional paid and volunteer staff capacity, most particularly in the hotline’s trained multi-lingual, multi-cultural response. 2) The County fields a mental health clinical specialist to augment mental health clinics for responding to those individuals identified as at risk for suicide. This clinician receives referrals from behavioral health professionals of persons deemed to be at risk, and provides a short term intervention and support response, while assisting in connecting the person to more long term care. 3) A multi-disciplinary, multi-agency Suicide Prevention Committee has been established, and has published a countywide Suicide Prevention Strategic Plan. This ongoing committee oversees the implementation of the Plan by addressing the strategies outlined in the Plan. These strategies include i) creating a countywide system of suicide prevention, ii) increasing interagency coordination and collaboration, iii) implementing education and training opportunities to prevent suicide, iv) implementing evidence based practices to prevent suicide, and v) evaluating the effectiveness of the County’s suicide prevention efforts. The allocation for this category is summarized in the following: Plan Element Region Served Number to be Served Yearly Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Contra Costa Crisis Center Countywide 25,000 320,006 County Clinician Countywide 50 133,762 County Supported Countywide N/A Included in PEI administrative cost Total 25,050 $453,768 PEI Administrative Support Staff have been allocated by the County to provide administrative support and evaluation of programs and plan elements that are funded by MHSA. The allocation for this activity is summarized below: Plan Element Region Served Yearly Funds Allocated Administrative and Evaluation Support Countywide 168,427 Total $168,427 63 Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Summary for FY 2019-20 Outreach for Increasing Recognition of Early Signs of Mental Illness 1,107,332 Prevention 1,762,991 Early Intervention 2,522,056 Access and Linkage to Treatment 1,004,498 Improving Timely Access to Mental Health Services for Underserved Populations 1,681,603 Stigma and Discrimination Reduction 490,931 Suicide Prevention 453,768 Administrative, Evaluation Support 168,427 Total $9,191,606 64 (This page left intentionally blank) 65 Innovation Innovation is the component of the Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan that funds new or different patterns of service that contribute to informing the mental health system of care as to best or promising practices that can be subsequently added or incorporated into the system. Innovative projects for CCBHS are developed by an ongoing community program planning process that is sponsored by the Consolidated Planning Advisory Workgroup through its Innovation Committee. New Innovation Regulations went into effect in October 2015. As before, innovative projects accomplish one or more of the following objectives; i) increase access to underserved groups, ii) increase the quality of services, to include better outcomes, iii) promote interagency collaboration, and iv) increase access to services. While Innovation projects have always been time-limited, the Innovation Regulations have placed a five-year time limit on Innovation projects. During FYs 2015-16 and 16-17, CCBHS staff and stakeholders reviewed and ensured that all existing and emerging Innovation projects complied with the Innovation Regulations. The following programs have been approved, implemented, and funds have been allocated for Fiscal Year 2019-20: 1) Coaching to Wellness. Individuals who have experience as a consumer and/or family member of the mental health system have been trained to provide mental health and health wellness coaching to recipients of integrated health and mental health services within CCBHS. These peer providers are part of the County’s Behavioral Health Services integration plans that are currently being implemented. Three Wellness Coaches are paired with two Wellness Nurses, and are assigned to the adult mental health clinics. The Coaches have received training specific to the skill sets needed to improve health and wellness outcomes for consumers. The Coaching to Wellness Project began implementation in FY 2015-16. 2) Partners in Aging. Older adults who are frail, homebound and suffer from mental health issues experience higher rates of isolation, psychiatric emergency interventions, and institutionalization that could be prevented. When fully implemented this project will field three field-based peer support workers to engage older adults who have been identified by their IMPACT clinicians, primary care providers, or Psychiatric Emergency Services as individuals who need additional staff care in order to avoid repeated crises, engage in ongoing mental health treatment, increase their skills in the activities of daily living, and engage appropriate resources and social networks. The Partners in Aging Project began implementation in FY 2016-17. 3) Overcoming Transportation Barriers. Transportation challenges provide a constant barrier to accessing mental health services. A comprehensive study was completed via the County’s community program planning process, and a 66 number of needs and strategies were documented. Findings indicated a need for multiple strategies to be combined in a systemic and comprehensive manner. These strategies include training consumers to independently navigate public transportation, providing flexible resources to assist with transportation costs, educating consumers regarding schedules, costs and means of various modes of public transportation, and creating a centralized staff response to coordinate efforts and respond to emerging transportation needs. Three Peer Specialists address these needs and provide a means to inform the mental health system of care regarding solutions for improving transportation access to care. The Overcoming Transportation Barriers Project began implementation in FY 2016-17. 4) Center for Recovery and Empowerment (CORE). CCBHS recognizes substance abuse/dependence in adolescence as it negatively affects physical, social, emotional and cognitive development. Early onset of alcohol or other drug use is one of the strongest predictors of later alcohol dependence. This is a priority because CCBHS does not have a coordinated system of care to provide treatment services to youth with addictions and co-occurring emotional disturbances. The CORE Project is an intensive outpatient treatment program offering three levels of care: intensive, transitional and continuing care to adolescents dually diagnosed with substance use and mental health disorders. Services will be provided by a multi-disciplinary team, and includes individual, group and family therapy, and linkage to community services. 5) Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills Training (CBSST). The project is designed to enhance the quality of life for the those residing in enhanced board & care homes by incorporating meaningful activity and skills into their daily routines and increasing overall functional improvement. Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills Training (CBSST) is an emerging practice with demonstrated positive results for persons with severe and persistent mental illness. The CBSST Project applies this therapeutic practice to the population of individuals that have been placed in augmented board and care facilities. The CBSST Project has a clinical team, consisting of a licensed clinician and peer support worker, to lead cognitive behavioral social skills training groups at board and care facilities. Adults with serious mental illness learn and practice skills that enable them to achieve and consolidate recovery based skills, while decreasing the need for costly interventions such as PES admissions. 67 The allocation for these projects are summarized below: Project County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Coaching to Wellness County Operated Countywide 90 619,579 Partners in Aging County Operated Countywide 45 176,222 Overcoming Transportation Barriers County Operated Countywide 200 191,842 Center for Recovery and Empowerment County Operated West 80 614,467 Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills Training County Operated Countywide 240 168,334 Administrative Support County Countywide Innovation Support 430,184 Total 520 $2,200,628 . 68 (This page left intentionally blank) 69 Workforce Education and Training Workforce Education and Training is the component of the Three Year Plan that provides education and training, workforce activities, to include career pathway development, and financial incentive programs for current and prospective CCBHS employees, contractor agency staff, and consumer and family members who volunteer their time to support the public mental health effort. The purpose of this component is to develop and maintain a diverse mental health workforce capable of providing consumer and family-driven services that are compassionate, culturally and linguistically responsive, and promote wellness, recovery and resilience across healthcare systems and community-based settings. The County’s Workforce, Education and Training Component Plan was developed and approved in May 2009, with subsequent yearly updates. The following represents funds and activities allocated in the categories of 1) Workforce Staffing Support, 2) Training and Technical Assistance, 3) Mental Health Career Pathway Programs, 4) Internship Programs, and 5) Financial Incentive Programs. Workforce Staffing Support 1) Workforce Education and Training Coordination. County staff are designated to develop and coordinate all aspects of this component. This includes conducting a workforce needs assessment, coordinating education and training activities, acting as an educational and training resource by participating in the Greater Bay Area Regional Partnership and state level workforce activities, providing staff support to County sponsored ongoing and ad-hoc workforce workgroups, developing and managing the budget for this component, applying for and maintaining the County’s mental health professional shortage designations, applying for workforce grants and requests for proposals, coordinating intern placements throughout the County, and managing the contracts with various training providers and community based organizations who implement the various workforce education and training activities. 2) Supporting Family Members. For the Three Year Plan a cadre of volunteers will be recruited, trained and supervised for the purpose of supporting family members and significant others of persons experiencing mental illness. Critical to successful treatment is the need for service providers to partner with family members and significant others of loved ones experiencing mental illness. Family members of consumers should be provided with assistance to enable them to become powerful natural supports in the recovery of their loved ones. Stakeholders continue to underscore the need to provide families and significant others with education and training, emotional support, and assistance with navigating the behavioral health system. Via a competitive Request for Qualifications process CCBHS is contracting with NAMI – Contra Costa to recruit, train and develop family members with lived experience to act as subject matter experts in a volunteer capacity to educate and support other family 70 members in understanding and best navigating and participating in the different systems of care. 3) Senior Peer Counseling Program. The Senior Peer Counseling Program within the Contra Costa Mental Health Older Adult Program recruits, trains and supports volunteer peer counselors to reach out to older adults at risk of developing mental illness by providing home visits and group support. Two clinical specialists support the efforts aimed at reaching Latina/o and Asian American seniors. The volunteers receive extensive training and consultation support. The MHSA funding allocation for this category is summarized below: Program/Plan Element County/ Contract Region Served MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 WET Coordination County Operated Countywide 302,826 Supporting Families NAMI - CC Countywide 618,000 Senior Peer Counseling County Operated Countywide 377,072 Total $1,297,898 Training and Technical Support 1) Staff Training. Various individual and group staff trainings will be funded that support the values of the Mental Health Services Act. As a part of the MHSA community program planning process, staff development surveys, CCBHS’s Training Advisory Workgroup and Reducing Health Disparities Workgroup, stakeholders identified six staff training and training-related themes; 1) Client Culture, 2) Knowledge and Skills, 3) Management, 4) Orientation, 5) Career Development, and 6) Interventions/Evidence Based Practices. Within these themes a number of training topics were listed and prioritized for MHSA funding in the Three Year Plan. 2) NAMI Basics/Faith Net/Family to Family (De Familia a Familia). NAMI-Contra Costa will offer these evidence based NAMI educational training programs on a countywide basis to culturally diverse family members and care givers of individuals experiencing mental health challenges. These training programs are designed to support and increase family members’ knowledge of mental health issues, navigation of systems, coping skills, and connectivity with community resources that are responsive and understanding of the challenges and impact of mental illness on the entire family. 3) Crisis Intervention Training. CCBHS partners with the County’s Sherriff’s Department to provide three day Crisis Intervention Trainings twice a year for law enforcement officers so that they are better able to respond safely and compassionately to crisis situations involving persons with mental health issues. Officers learn from mental health professionals, experienced officers, consumers and family members who advise, problem-solve and support with verbal de-escalation skills, personal stories, and provide scenario-based training on responding to crises. 71 4) Mental Health First Aid Instructor Training. CCBHS works with the National Council to train staff to become certified instructors for Mental Health First Aid. These instructors will then provide Mental Health First Aid Training to community and faith based organizations and agencies who are often first responders to community trauma, violence or natural disaster. Mental Health First Aid is a proprietary evidence based in-person training for anyone who wants to learn about mental illness and addictions, including risk factors and warning signs. This eight hour training provides participants with a five step action plan to help a person in crisis connect with professional, peer, social, and self-help care. Participants are given the opportunity to practice their new skills and gain confidence in helping others who may be developing a mental health or substance use challenge, or those in distress. The MHSA funding allocation for this category is summarized below: Plan Element County/Contract Region Served MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 19-20 Staff Training Various vendors Countywide 238,203 NAMI Basics/ Faith Net/ De Familia a Familia NAMI-Contra Costa Countywide 63,706 Crisis Intervention Training County Sherriff’s Department Countywide 15,000 Mental Health First Aid The National Council Countywide 20,000 Total $336,909 Mental Health Career Pathway Program 1) Service Provider Individualized Recovery Intensive Training (SPIRIT) is a college accredited recovery oriented, peer led classroom and experiential-based program for individuals with lived mental health experience as a consumer or a family member of a consumer. This classroom and internship experience leads to a certification for individuals who successfully complete the program, and is accepted as the minimum qualifications necessary for employment within CCBHS in the classification of Community Support Worker. Participants learn peer provider skills, group facilitation, Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) development, wellness self-management strategies and other skills needed to gain employment in peer provider and family partner positions in both county operated and community based organizations. The Office for Consumer Empowerment (OCE) offers this training annually, and supplements the class with a monthly peer support group for those individuals who are employed by the County in various peer and family partner roles. For the Three Year Plan the SPIRIT Program has been expanded to provide support and assistance with placement and advancement for SPIRIT graduates consistent with their career aspirations. 72 The MHSA funding allocation for this category is summarized below: Program County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Annual Funds Allocated SPIRIT OCE County Staff Contra Costa College Countywide 50 358,338 30,000 Total $388,338 Internship Programs CCBHS supports internship programs which place graduate level students in various County operated and community based organizations. Particular emphasis is put on the recruitment of individuals who are bi-lingual and/or bi-cultural, individuals with consumer and/or family member experience, and individuals who can reduce the disparity of race/ethnicity identification of staff with that of the population served. CCBHS provides funding to enable up to 75 graduate level students to participate in paid internships in both county operated and contract agencies that lead to licensure as a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW), Clinical Psychologist and Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. These County financed internships are in addition to the state level workforce education and training stipend programs that are funded by the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. This state funded stipend program requires that participants commit to working in community public mental health upon graduation. The County’s assessment of workforce needs has determined that a combination of state and locally financed internships has enabled the County and its contractors to keep pace with the annual rate of turnover of licensed staff. The MHSA funding allocation for this category is summarized below: Program County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Annual Funds Allocated Graduate Level Internships County Operated Countywide 245,000 Graduate Level Internships Contract Agencies Countywide 100,000 Total 75 $345,000 Financial Incentive Programs 1) MHLAP. CCBHS will participate in the state level workforce, education and training funded Mental Health Loan Assumption Program (MHLAP) until it sunsets in 2018-19. Administered by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, this program makes annual payments of up to $10,000 to an educational lending institution on behalf of an employee who has incurred debt while obtaining education. The recipient is required to work in the public mental health system for a year (up to five years) before a payment is made. 73 2) Loan Repayment Program. For the Three Year Plan CCBHS has implemented a County funded Loan Repayment Program that specifically addresses critical psychiatry shortages, and provides potential career advancement opportunities for CCBHS Community Support Workers performing in the roles of peer provider and family partner. The 2016 Needs Assessment of workforce staffing shortages revealed that only 43% of authorized County psychiatrist positions were filled in FY 2015-16. Contracts for non-county psychiatrist time have been utilized to make up the shortage, but actual utilization falls significantly short of what is authorized. While all county mental health programs struggle to be competitive with the private sector for psychiatry time, Contra Costa’s pay for psychiatrists, both county and contract psychiatrists, lags behind the pay provided by neighboring Bay Area county mental health programs. CCBHS partners with the California Mental Health Services Authority (CalMHSA) to administer a loan repayment program patterned after the state level MHLAP, but differing in providing flexibility in the amount awarded each individual, and the County selecting the awardees based upon workforce need, such as psychiatrists. The MHSA funding allocation for this category is summarized below: Program County/ Contract Region Served Number to be Served Yearly MHSA Funds Allocated for FY 2019-20 Loan Repayment CalMHSA Countywide To be determined 300,000 Total $300,000 Workforce Education and Training (WET) Component Budget Authorization for FY 2019-20: Workforce Staffing Support 1,297,888 Training and Technical Assistance 336,909 Mental Health Career Pathways 388,338 Internship Program 345,000 Loan Forgiveness Program 300,000 Total $2,668,145 74 (This page left intentionally blank) 75 Capital Facilities/Information Technology The Capital Facilities/Information Technology component of the Mental Health Services Act enables counties to utilize MHSA funds on a one-time basis for major infrastructure costs necessary to i) implement MHSA services and supports, and ii) generally improve support to the County’s community mental health service system. For the Three Year Plan Contra Costa has one Capital Facility Project in progress. Oak Grove. $3 million has been set aside to renovate and retrofit two county owned buildings and to certify this campus as a 16 bed Short Term Residential Therapeutic Program (STRTP) to address residential treatment requirements for transition age youth ages 15-26 who have been determined to need high acuity mental health treatment services in an unlocked environment. Residential and supportive services will be co-located to provide voluntary assertive community treatment level services with safe and stable housing for the most vulnerable and at-risk youth who are experiencing serious mental health issues. For the Three Year Plan Contra Costa has one Information Technology Project in progress. Electronic Mental Health Record System. Contra Costa received approval from the State in 2010 to utilize up to $6 million in MHSA funds to develop and implement an electronic mental health record system. The approved project has transformed the current paper and location-based system with an electronic system where clinical documentation can be centralized and made accessible to all members of a consumer’s treatment team, with shared decision-making functionality. It replaces the existing claims system, where network providers and contract agencies would be part of the system and be able to exchange their clinical and billing information with the County. The electronic health record system allows doctors to submit their pharmacy orders electronically, and permit sharing between psychiatrists and primary care physicians to allow knowledge of existing health conditions and drug inter-operability. When fully implemented it will allow consumers to access part of their medical record, make appointments, and electronically communicate with their treatment providers. Subsequent to approval for this project Contra Costa Health Services, to include Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, the ambulatory care clinics and the Contra Costa Health Plan, converted existing systems to an integrated electronic medical record system, entitled EPIC. This conversion of the larger health care system initiated an analysis to determine the feasibility of using the EPIC system for behavioral health services. The analysis indicated significant functionality gaps in the clinical documentation and billing for specialty mental health services, as it utilized a different billing format. Closing the gap required significant development efforts by EPIC system staff. Initiation of the electronic mental health record system was delayed until EPIC 76 was fully operational in Contra Costa’s Health Service Division, and functionality between EPIC’s capacity and the electronic mental health record’s objectives could be determined. This was solved by the certification of EPIC’s Tapestry module, and work began in FY 2013-14. The Epic Tapestry project has the capacity to communicate and share information with EPIC and other systems currently in use by contract providers and other entities involved in the treatment and care of clients. The project is scheduled to be completed during this MHS Three Year Plan. As per the 2010 proposal, funding from the County’s Health Services Department would be sought for any costs that exceed the originally approved $6 million. MHSA funds estimated to be available for the FY 2019-20: $3,000,000 77 The Budget Previous chapters provide detailed projected budgets for individual MHSA plan elements, projects, programs, categories and components for FY 2019-20. The following table summarizes a budget estimate of total MHSA spending authority by component. FY CSS PEI INN WET CF/TN TOTAL 19/20 37,690,971 9,191,606 2,200,628 2,668,145 3,000,000 54,751,349 Appendix E, entitled Funding Summaries, provides a FY 2017-18 through FY 2019-20 Three Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan. This funding summary matches budget authority with projected revenues, and shows sufficient MHSA funds are available to fully fund all programs, projects and plan elements for the duration of the three year period. The following fund ledger depicts projected available funding versus total budget authority for FY 19-20: Fiscal Year 2019/20 A. Estimated FY 2019/20 Available Funding CSS PEI INN WET CF/TN TOTAL 1.Estimated unspent funds from prior fiscal years 34,131,898 7,750,964 3,600,842 3,824,292 866,071 50,174,067 2. Estimated new FY 19/20 funding 32,686,530 8,170,501 2,149,537 0 0 43,006,568 3. Transfers in FY 19/20 (3,000,000) 0 0 0 3,000,000 0 4.Estimated available funding for FY 19/20 63,818,428 15,921,465 5,750,379 3,824,292 3,866,071 93,180,635 B. Budget Authority For FY19/20 37,690,971 9,191,606 2,200,628 2,668,145 3,000,000 54,751,349 C. Estimated FY 19/20 Unspent Fund Balance 26,127,457 6,729,859 3,549,751 1,156,147 866,071 38,429,286 Prudent Reserve: $7,125,250 78 Notes. 1. A collective increase in budget authority for programs, projects and plan elements for the third year of the Three Year Plan has projected an increase in the cost of doing business for both the County and service providers contracting with the County. This budget authority will be reviewed and updated based upon recent actual costs and projected revenue and adjusted, if appropriate, for Board of Supervisor review and approval. 2. The Mental Health Services Act requires that 20% of the total of new funds received by the County from the State MHSA Trust Fund go for the PEI component. The balance of new funding is for the CSS component. From the total of CSS and PEI components, five percent of the total new funding is to go for the Innovation (INN) component, and is to be equally divided between the CSS and PEI allotment. The estimated new funding for each fiscal year includes this distribution. 3. Estimated new funding year includes the sum of the distribution from the State MHSA Trust Fund, interest earned from the County’s MHSA fund, and federal financial reimbursement for qualified Medi-Cal expenditures utilizing MHSA funds as match, to include the EPSDT special fund sub-account. 4. The County may set aside up to 20% of the average amount of funds allocated to the County for the previous five years for the Workforce, Education and Training (WET) component, Capital Facilities, Information Technology (CF/TN) component, and a prudent reserve. For this three year period the County has allocated $7,565,790 for the WET component, and $3 million in FY 19/20 for the CF/TN component. This is depicted as transfers from the CSS component. 5. The MHSA requires that counties set aside sufficient funds, entitled a prudent reserve, to ensure that services do not have to be significantly reduced in years in which revenues are below the average of previous years. The County’s prudent reserve balance through June 30, 2018 is $7,125,250. This figure is in addition to the estimated available unspent funds from previous years. 6. It is projected that the requested total budget authority for the Three Year Plan period enables the County to fully fund all proposed programs and plan elements while maintaining sufficient funding reserves (prudent reserve plus unspent funds from previous years) to offset any reduction in state MHSA Trust Fund distribution or federal financial participation (Medi-Cal reimbursement). 79 Evaluating the Plan Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services is committed to evaluating the effective use of funds provided by the Mental Health Services Act. Toward this end a comprehensive program and fiscal review process has been implemented to a) improve the services and supports provided, b) more efficiently support the County’s MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan, and c) ensure compliance with statute, regulations and policies. During each three year period, each of the MHSA funded contract and county operated programs undergoes a program and fiscal review. This entails interviews and surveys of individuals both delivering and receiving services, review of data, case files, program and financial records, and performance history. Key areas of inquiry include: • Delivering services according to the values of the Mental Health Services Act. • Serving those who need the service. • Providing services for which funding was allocated. • Meeting the needs of the community and/or population. • Serving the number of individuals that have been agreed upon. • Achieving the outcomes that have been agreed upon. • Assuring quality of care. • Protecting confidential information. • Providing sufficient and appropriate staff for the program. • Having sufficient resources to deliver the services. • Following generally accepted accounting principles. • Maintaining documentation that supports agreed upon expenditures. • Charging reasonable administrative costs. • Maintaining required insurance policies. • Communicating effectively with community partners. Each program receives a written report that addresses each of the above areas. Promising practices, opportunities for improvement, and/or areas of concern will be noted for sharing or follow-up activity, as appropriate. The emphasis will be to establish a culture of continuous improvement of service delivery, and quality feedback for future planning efforts. In addition, a quarterly MHSA Financial Report is generated that depicts funds budgeted versus spent for each program and plan element included in this plan. This enables ongoing fiscal accountability, as well as provides information with which to engage in sound planning. 80 (This page left intentionally blank) 81 Acknowledgements We acknowledge that this document is not a description of how Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services has delivered on the promise provided by the Mental Health Services Act. It is, however, a plan for how the County can continually improve upon delivering on the promise. We have had the honor to meet many people who have overcome tremendous obstacles on their journey to recovery. They were quite open that the care they received literally saved their life. We also met people who were quite open and honest regarding where we need to improve. For these individuals, we thank you for sharing. We would also like to acknowledge those Contra Costa stakeholders, both volunteer and professional, who have devoted their time and energy over the years to actively and positively improve the quality and quantity of care that has made such a difference in people’s lives. They often have come from a place of frustration and anger with how they and their loved ones were not afforded the care that could have avoided unnecessary pain and suffering. They have instead chosen to model the kindness and care needed, while continually working as a team member to seek and implement better and more effective treatment programs and practices. For these individuals, we thank you, and feel privileged to be a part of your team. The MHSA Staff 82 (This page left intentionally blank) Appendix A Mental Health Service Maps Mental Health Services Act funded programs and plan elements are only a portion of the total funding that supports public mental health services provided by Contra Costa County employees and staff employed by contractors. The backbone of the CCMH system of care is its three county operated Children’s and three county operated Adult clinics that serve the Western, Central and Eastern regions of the county. The following six service maps provide a visual picture, or architecture, of the constellation of types of Contra Costa Mental Health’s programs, and thus enable the viewer to see the inclusion of MHSA funded services as part of the entire system of care. A-1 Telecare Idylwood Convalescent East County Adult Mental Health Services Child Abuse Prevention Council Concord, service Countywide Rainbow Community Center Concord, service Countywide C.O.P.E. Family Support Center Concord, service Countywide Jewish Family & Children’s Services Walnut Creek, service Countywide Crestwood MHRCs Canyon Manor California Psychiatric Transitions Countywide Long- term Care Providers (IMDs/MHRCs) County Inpatient: CCRMC – 4C East County Adult Mental Health Clinics 2311 Loveridge Rd. Pittsburg, CA 94565 Population Served: Adults & Older Adults, TAY Services: Assessments Case Management Psychiatric Services Crisis Intervention Housing Services Benefits Assistance/Financial Counseling Rapid Access Money Management Vocational Services Individual Therapy Therapy Groups Primary Care (Pittsburg Health Center) County Psychiatric Emergency Services La Clinica de la Raza Pittsburg Contra Costa Interfaith Housing Pittsburg Center for Human Development Bay Point Prevention & Early Intervention Programs George & Cynthia Miller Wellness Center Martinez Countywide Services Anka Behavioral Health Nierika House Crisis Residential Facility 1959 Solano Way, Concord Nevin House Transitional Residential Facility 3215/3221 Nevin Ave., Richmond Phoenix Center Medication Management 1470 Civic Court, Suite 1111 in Concord Conservatorship/Guardianship Augmented Board and Care Homes Blessed Care Home Pittsburg Johnson Care Home Antioch Menona Drive Care Home Antioch Oak Hills Residential Facility Pittsburg System of Care – Regional Community Based Organizations Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center Adult FSP 555 School St., Pittsburg Youth Homes TAY FSP 2213 Buchanan Rd., Antioch Provider Network Amador Institute Antioch Psychotherapy Institute Antioch YWCA Antioch 50 Individual Providers (Adults and Children) Consumer-Driven Programs ANKA Shelter West 4th St., Antioch Recovery Innovations Consumer-Run Community Center 3701 Lone Tree Way, Antioch Contracted Psychiatric Hospitals John Muir Behavioral Health Concord Herrick Hospital Berkeley BHC Heritage Oaks Sacramento BHC Sierra Vista Sacramento Consumer Self-Help Center (Patients’ Rights Advocates) Paraiso Home Oakley St. Helena Hospital St. Helena Contra Costa Crisis Center Springhill Home Pittsburg St. Helena Hospital Vallejo Crestwood The Bridge Board & Care Our House Board & Care Crestwood Pathways Transitional Residential First-Hope Program PEI Forensic Services Hope House Crisis Residential Facility 300 Ilene St., Martinez Older Adult Services Senior Peer Counseling Impact ICM Transition Services Vocational Services A-2 East County Children’s Mental Health Services Antioch Children’s Behavioral Health 2335 Country Hills Drive Antioch, CA 94509 Population Served: Children and TAY Services: Head Start Program Psychiatric Services Outpatient Services Parent Partners Parent Project Wrap Around Services Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Dialectical Behavior Therapy Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Triple P Parenting Family Based Therapy for Eating Disorders County Psychiatric Emergency Services George & Cynthia Wellness Center Martinez Countywide Services School-Based Program Unit System of Care – Regional Community Based Organizations Provider Network Prevention & Early Intervention Programs Contracted Psychiatric Hospitals Children’s Specialty Programs 2425 Bisso Ln. #235 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY •Child & Family Mental Health Services •Social Services Child Assessment Unit •Spirit of Caring •Katie A. •Local and National Case Management COFY (Multi-Systemic Therapy and Functional Family Therapy) Consumer Self-Help Center (Patients’ Rights Advocates) County-Wide Assessment Team 2425 Bisso Ln. #235 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY First-Hope Program (PEI) Hospital & Residential Unit 2425 Bisso Ln. #280 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY •Local and National Case Management •Hospital Liaison •TBS Services Coordination Head Start Outpatient Services La Cheim At: Antioch Seneca Center At:Riverview Middle School (Mount Diablo Unified School District) Outpatient School-wide Mental Health Services Lincoln Pittsburg Unified School District Elementary, Middle, and High Schools Mental Health Enhanced Classroom(s) Community Health for Asian Americans Antioch La Clinica Oakley Youth Homes TAY FSP Antioch Child Therapy Institute Antioch Center for Psychotherapy Antioch Organizational: Amador Institute Antioch YWCA Antioch 50 Individual Providers (Adults and Children) Center for Human Development Bay Point Contra Costa Interfaith Housing Pittsburg La Clinica de la Raza Pittsburg People Who Care Pittsburg Rainbow Community Center Concord, service Countywide STAND! Antioch Child Abuse Prevention Council Concord, service Countywide Contra Costa Crisis Center Walnut Creek John Muir Behavioral Health Concord Herrick Hospital Berkeley BHC Heritage Oaks Sacramento BHC Sierra Vista Sacramento St. Helena Hospital - St. Helena St. Helena Hospital - Vallejo Mental Health and Probation Services 202 Glacier Dr. Martinez Population Served: Children & TAY •Juvenile Hall, Juvenile Assessment and Consultation Services •Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility •Regional Probation Liaisons Lincoln Elementary Schools: Foothill, Petite Academy Middle Schools: Black Diamond, Learning Academy Jewish Family and Children Services Walnut Creek, service Countywide Lincoln Child Center (In-Home Behavioral Services) Lincoln (Multi-Dimensional Family Therapy) We Care (0-5) Seneca (Mobile Response Team) STAND! (Respite & Mentoring) Start FSP Seneca TBS Providers COFY Seneca Youth Homes La Cheim ASPIRAnet Fred Finch Youth Center Milhouse Children’s Services St. Vincent’s School for Boys Victor Community Support Services Thunder Road (Integrated Adolescent SUD/MH Intensive Outpatient) Fred Finch - Avalon Dual-diagnoses residential treatment and nonpublic school A-3 Central County Adult Mental Health Services Telecare Idylwood Convalescent Rainbow Community Center Concord Putnam Clubhouse Concord Jewish Family & Children’s Services Walnut Creek C.O.P.E. Family Support Center Concord Center for Human Development Pleasant Hill Crestwood MHRCs Canyon Manor California Psychiatric Transitions Countywide Long-term Care Providers (IMDs/MHRCs) County Inpatient: CCRMC – 4C Central County Adult Mental Health Clinic 1420 Willow Pass Rd., Concord Population Served: Adults & Older Adults, TAY Services: Assessments Case Management Psychiatric Services Crisis Intervention Housing Services Benefits Assistance Rapid Access Suicide Prevention Pilot Perinatal/Post-partum Depression Pilot Individual Therapy Therapy Groups Primary Care (Willow Pass Wellness Center) County Psychiatric Emergency Services Contra Costa Interfaith Housing Pleasant Hill La Clinica de la Raza Concord Child Abuse Prevention Council Concord Prevention & Early Intervention Programs George & Cynthia Miller Wellness Center Martinez Countywide Services Anka Behavioral Health Nierika House Crisis Residential Facility 1959 Solano Way, Concord Nevin House Transitional Residential Facility 3215/3221 Nevin Ave., Richmond Phoenix Center Medication Management 1470 Civic Court, Suite 1111 in Concord Conservatorship/Guardianship Consumer Self-Help Center Patients’ Rights Advocates Contra Costa Crisis Center Augmented Board and Care Homes CC’s Adult Residential Care Home Concord Concord Hill Concord God’s Grace Hayward Happy Home Concord Margarita’s Villa of Care Concord Modesto Residential System of Care – Regional Community Based Organizations ANKA Central FSP Concord Clayton Way TAY Transitional/ Independent Housing Fred Finch TAY FSP Rainbow Community Center Counseling Program 2118 Willow Pass Rd., Concord Youth Homes TAY FSP Provider Network YWCA Martinez Individual Providers (90 Adult and Children) Consumer-Driven Programs ANKA Multi Service Center 1121 Detroit Ave., Concord Recovery Innovations Consumer-Run Community Center 2975 Treat Blvd., Walnut Creek Contracted Psychiatric Hospitals John Muir Behavioral Health Concord Herrick Hospital Berkeley BHC Heritage Oaks Sacramento BHC Sierra Vista Sacramento St. Helena Hospital St. Helena St. Helena Hospital Vallejo Crestwood The Bridge Board & Care Our House Board & Care Pleasant Hill Manor Pleasant Hill Crestwood Pathways Transitional Residential Scenic View Martinez First-Hope Program PEI Woodhaven Home Concord Forensic Services Williams Board and Care Vallejo Hope House Crisis Residential Facility 300 Ilene St., Martinez Older Adult Services Senior Peer Counseling Impact ICM Transition Services Vocational Services A-4 Central County Children’s Mental Health Services Central County Children’s Mental Health Clinic 2425 Bisso, Ste. 200 Concord, CA 94520 Population Served: Children and TAY Services: Psychiatric Services Outpatient Services Parent Partners Parent Project PIP Program Wrap Around Services Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Dialectical Behavior Therapy Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Triple P Parenting Family Based Therapy for Eating Disorders County Psychiatric Emergency Services George & Cynthia Wellness Center Martinez Countywide Services School-Based Program Unit System of Care – Community Based Organizations Provider Network Prevention & Early Intervention Programs Contracted Psychiatric Hospitals Children’s Specialty Programs 2425 Bisso Ln. #235 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY •Child & Family Mental Health Services •Social Services Child Assessment Unit •Spirit of Caring •Katie A. •Local and National Case Management Head Start Unbundled Day Treatment Uplift Youth Services Bureau Concord STAND! Concord Rainbow Community Organizational: YWCA Martinez 90 Individual Providers (Adults and Children) Center for Human Development Pleasant Hill Child Abuse Prevention Council Concord Contra Costa John Muir Behavioral Health Concord Herrick Hospital Berkeley COFY Multi-Systemic Therapy and Functional Family Therapy Consumer Self-Help Center Patients’ Rights Advocates County-Wide Assessment Team 2425 Bisso Ln. #235 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY First-Hope Program PEI Hospital & Residential Unit 2425 Bisso Ln. #280 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY •Hospital Liaison •Emergency Foster Care •TBS Services Coordination Mental Health and Probation Services 202 Glacier Dr. Martinez Population Served: Children & TAY •Juvenile Hall, Juvenile Assessment and Consultation Services •Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility •Regional Probation Liaisons Lincoln Child Center In-Home Behavioral Services Mount Diablo High School, Concord La Cheim Nonpublic School Antioch and El Sobrante, service Countywide Seneca Olivera Nonpublic School Concord Seneca Collaborative At: Pleasant Hill Middle School, Riverside MS (MDUSD) Outpatient School-wide Mental Health Services COFY Marchus School – Elementary and Middle (CCCOE) Fred Finch Elementary: Bel Air, Shore Acres, Wren Ave, Meadow Homes, Ygnacio Valley Middle: El Dorado, Oak Grove, Valley View High: Mt. Diablo, Ygnacio Valley, Concord Center Concord MDUSD Fair Oaks Wrap Clinic Concord Fred Finch CCTAY FSP San Pablo, serves West and Central Youth Homes TAY FSP Serves East and Central Interfaith Housing Pleasant Hill C.O.P.E. Family Support Center Concord La Clinica de la Raza Concord New Leaf Martinez Rainbow Community Center Concord STAND! Concord Contra Costa Crisis Center Walnut Creek Jewish Family and Children Services Walnut Creek BHC Heritage Oaks Sacramento BHC Sierra Vista Sacramento St. Helena Hospital - St. Helena St. Helena Hospital - Vallejo Lincoln Multi-Dimensional Family Therapy We Care 0-5 Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Schools: Sunrise High Schools: Mt. Diablo, Olympic, Alliance Seneca Mobile Response Team STAND! Respite & Mentoring Start FSP Seneca TBS Providers COFY Seneca Youth Homes La Cheim ASPIRAnet Fred Finch Youth Center Milhouse Children’s Services St. Vincent’s School for Boys Victor Community Support Services Thunder Road (Integrated Adolescent SUD/MH Intensive Outpatient) Fred Finch - Avalon Dual-diagnoses residential treatment and nonpublic school A-5 Lifelong Medical Care Richmond West County Adult Mental Health Services C.O.P.E. Family Support Center Concord, service Countywide Rainbow Community Center Concord, service RYSE TAY Richmond Native American Health Center Richmond Telecare Idylwood Convalescent Crestwood MHRCs Canyon Manor California Psychiatric Transitions Countywide Long-term Care Providers (IMDs/MHRCs) County Inpatient: CCRMC – 4C West County Adult Mental Health Clinics 2523 El Portal Dr. #103, San Pablo Population Served: Adults & Older Adults, TAY Services: Assessments Case Management Psychiatric Services Crisis Intervention Housing Services Benefits Assistance Rapid Access Individual Therapy Therapy Groups Countywide Child Abuse Prevention Council Concord, service Countywide County Psychiatric Emergency Services The Latina Center Richmond Lao Family Community Development San Pablo Jewish Family and Children Services Walnut Creek, service Countywide Building Blocks for Kids Richmond Asian Family Services Richmond Prevention & Early Intervention Programs George & Cynthia Miller Wellness Center Martinez Countywide Services Anka Behavioral Health Nierika House Crisis Residential Facility 1959 Solano Way, Concord Nevin House Transitional Residential Facility 3215/3221 Nevin Ave., Richmond Phoenix Center Medication Management 1470 Civic Court, Suite 1111 in Concord Conservatorship/Guardianship Augmented Board and Care Homes Ducre’s Residential Care Richmond Family Courtyard Richmond God’s Grace Hayward Williams Board and Care Richmond System of Care – Regional Community Based Organizations Familias Unidas Adult FSP 205 39th Street, Richmond Fred Finch TAY FSP 2523 El Portal Dr., San Pablo Portia Bell Hume Center West County Adult FSP and Outpatient Richmond Provider Network Asian Community Mental Health Richmond 40 Individual Providers (Adults and Children) Consumer-Driven Programs ANKA Programs, Inc. Multi Service Center 1515 Market St., San Pablo Recovery Innovations Consumer-Run Community Center 256 24th St., Richmond Contracted Psychiatric Hospitals John Muir Behavioral Health Concord Herrick Hospital Berkeley BHC Heritage Oaks Sacramento BHC Sierra Vista Sacramento Consumer Self-Help Center Patients’ Rights Advocates Yvonne’s Home Care Richmond St. Helena Hospital St. Helena Contra Costa Crisis Center St. Helena Hospital Vallejo Crestwood The Bridge Board & Care Our House Board & Care Crestwood Pathways Transitional Residential First-Hope Program PEI Forensic Services Hope House Crisis Residential Facility 300 Ilene St., Martinez Older Adult Services Senior Peer Counseling Impact ICM Transition Services Vocational Services A--6 West County Children’s Mental Health Services West County Children’s Mental Health Clinic 303 41st Street Richmond, CA Population Served: Children and TAY Services: Psychiatric Services Outpatient Services Parent Partners Wrap Around Services Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Dialectical Behavior Therapy Trauma Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Triple P Parenting NA/AA County Psychiatric Emergency Services George & Cynthia Wellness Center Martinez Countywide Services School-Based Program Unit System of Care – Regional Community Based Organizations Provider Network Prevention & Early Intervention Programs Contracted Psychiatric Hospitals Children’s Specialty Programs 2425 Bisso Ln. #235 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY •Child & Family Mental Health Services •Social Services Child Assessment Unit •Spirit of Caring •Katie A. •Local and National Case Management COFY (Multi-Systemic Therapy) Consumer Self-Help Center (Patients’ Rights Advocates) County-Wide Assessment Team 2425 Bisso Ln. #235 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY Head Start Unbundled Day Treatment La Cheim At: La Ceim School Richmond (NPS) Seneca At: Catalyst (WCCUSD) Outpatient School-wide Mental Health Services at WCCUSD Schools Alternative Family Services Richmond BACR Richmond Community Health for Asian Americans Richmond WCCUSD Wraparound Clinic WCCUSD Early Childhood Mental Health Richmond Organizational: Asian Community Mental Health Richmond Carrie McCluer & Associates Crocket 40 Individual Providers (Adults and Children) Building Blocks for Kids Richmond The James Morehouse Project El Cerrito The Latina Center Richmond Native American Health Center Richmond RYSE Richmond John Muir Behavioral Health Concord Herrick Hospital Berkeley BHC Heritage Oaks Sacramento BHC Sierra Vista Sacramento St. Helena Hospital - St. Helena First-Hope Program (PEI) Hospital & Residential Unit 2425 Bisso Ln. #280 Concord Population Served: Children & TAY •Local and National Case Management •Hospital Liaison •TBS Services Coordination Mental Health and Probation Services 202 Glacier Dr. Martinez Population Served: Children & TAY •Juvenile Hall, Juvenile Assessment and Consultation Services •Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility •Regional Probation Liaisons Lincoln Child Center (In-Home Behavioral Services) Lincoln (Multi-Dimensional Family Therapy) Bay Area Community Resources (BACR) Elementary Schools: Grant, Harbor Way, Lincoln, Nystrom, Peres, Martin Luther King, and Stege Middle Schools: Crespi, Pinole, Portola, Hercules High Schools: El Cerrito, Richmond, Pinole Valley, Hercules Community Health for Asian American Elementary Schools: Lincoln, Nystrom Middle Schools: Helms, LoVonya DeJean High Schools: El Cerrito, Kennedy, Richmond Seneca Elementary Schools: Highland, Sheldon, Tara Hills Middle Schools: Pinole, Transitional Learning Center (WCCUSD) Familias Unidas Richmond Fred Finch (TAY FSP) Richmond La Cheim Richmond Youth Services Bureau Richmond Child Therapy Institute El Cerrito STAND! Richmond Contra Costa Crisis Center Walnut Creek, service Countywide C.O.P.E. Family Support Center Concord, service Countywide Child Abuse Prevention Council Concord, service Countywide Rainbow Community Center Concord, service Countywide St. Helena Hospital - Vallejo We Care (0-5) Seneca (Mobile Response Team) Y Team Elementary School: Nystrom Middle School: Crespi, Helms, Portola, LoVonya DeJean High Schools: De Anza, El Cerrito, Kennedy, Richmond STAND! (Respite & Mentoring) Start FSP Seneca Youth Services Bureau Elementary Schools: Washington, Harbour Way, Transitional Learning Middle Schools: Crespi, Pinole, Portola, Hercules High School: El Cerrito, Richmond, Pinole Valley, Hercules TBS Providers COFY Seneca Youth Homes La Cheim ASPIRAnet Fred Finch Youth Center Milhouse Children’s Services St. Vincent’s School for Boys Victor Community Support Services Thunder Road (Integrated Adolescent SUD/MH Intensive Outpatient) Fred Finch - Avalon Dual-diagnoses residential treatment and nonpublic school A-7 (This page left intentionally blank) A-8 B-1 Appendix B Program and Plan Element Profiles Table of Contents Anka Behavioral Health, Inc. ............................................................................................. B-3 Asian Community Mental Health Services (ACMHS) ......................................................... B-5 Building Blocks for Kids (BBK) ........................................................................................... B-7 Center for Human Development (CHD) ............................................................................. B-9 Central County Adult Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) .................. B-11 Central County Children’s Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) .......... B-12 Child Abuse Prevention Council (CAPC) ......................................................................... B-13 Community Options for Families and Youth, Inc. (COFY, Inc.) ........................................ B-14 Contra Costa Crisis Center .............................................................................................. B-16 Contra Costa Interfaith Housing (CCIH) ........................................................................... B-18 Counseling Options Parent Education (C.O.P.E.) Family Support Center ........................ B-20 Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc. ................................................................................... B-22 Desarrollo Familiar, Inc. (Familias Unidas) ...................................................................... B-23 Divine’s Home ................................................................................................................. B-25 East County Adult Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health)....................... B-26 East County Children’s Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) .............. B-28 First Five Contra Costa .................................................................................................... B-29 First Hope (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ................................................................... B-30 Forensic Mental Health (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ............................................... B-32 Fred Finch Youth Center ................................................................................................. B-34 George and Cynthia Milller Wellness Center (Contra Costa Behavioral Helath) B-36 James Morehouse Project (JMP) at El Cerrito High, YMCA East Bay .............................. B-37 Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay (JFCS East Bay) ................................... B-39 Juvenile Justice System – Supporting Youth (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ............. B-41 La Clínica de la Raza ...................................................................................................... B-43 LAO Family Community Development ............................................................................. B-45 The Latina Center ............................................................................................................ B-46 Lifelong Medical Care ...................................................................................................... B-47 Lincoln Child Center ........................................................................................................ B-48 PH Senior Care, LLC (Pleasant Hill Manor) ..................................................................... B-50 B-2 Mental Health Services Act Housing Services (Contra Costa Health, Housing, and Homeless – H3) ............................................................................................................... B-51 Mental Health Systems, Inc. ............................................................................................ B-53 Modesto Residential Living Center, LLC. ......................................................................... B-55 National Alliance on Mental Illness Contra Costa (NAMI CC) .......................................... B-56 Native American Health Center (NAHC) .......................................................................... B-58 Oak Hills Residential Facility............................................................................................ B-59 Office for Consumer Empowerment – OCE (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ................ B-60 Older Adult Mental Health (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ........................................... B-62 People Who Care (PWC) Children Association ............................................................... B-65 Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center ................................................. B-66 Primary Care Clinic Behavioral Health Support (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) B-69 Putnam Clubhouse .......................................................................................................... B-70 Rainbow Community Center ............................................................................................ B-72 RI International Inc. (formerly known as Recovery Innovations) ...................................... B-74 RYSE Center ................................................................................................................... B-76 Seneca Family of Agencies ............................................................................................. B-78 SHELTER, Inc. ................................................................................................................ B-80 STAND! For Families Free of Violence ............................................................................ B-83 Telecare Corporation ....................................................................................................... B-84 United Family Care, LLC (Family Courtyard) ................................................................... B-86 Vicente Martinez High School - Martinez Unified School District ...................................... B-87 West County Adult Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ...................... B-89 West County Children’s Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) ............. B-90 Williams Board and Care ................................................................................................. B-91 Woodhaven ..................................................................................................................... B-92 Youth Homes, Inc. ........................................................................................................... B-93 (This page left intentionally blank) ....................................................................................... B-95 B-3 Anka Behavioral Health, Inc. www.ankabhi.org Point of Contact: Chris Withrow, Chief Executive Officer. Contact Information: 2975 Treat Blvd Suite C-5, Concord, CA 94518 (925) 219-9009, cwithrow@ankabhi.org 1. General Description of the Organization Anka’s mission is to eliminate the impact of behavioral health problems for all people. Anka serves more than 15,000 individuals annually and employs nearly 1,000 professional, specialized staff members. Anka’s philosophy is to treat the whole person by fully integrating care of both mind and body, always using clinically-proven, psycho- social models designed to promote health and wellness while containing costs. 2. Program: Adult Full Service Partnership - CSS The Adult Full Service Partnership (FSP) joins the resources of Anka Behavioral Health and Costa County Behavioral Health Services, and utilizes a modified assertive community treatment model. The program serves adults who reside in Contra Costa County, who experience a serious mental illness/serious emotional disturbance. a. Scope of Services: Services use an integrated multi-disciplinary team approach, based on a modified Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model of care. Services include outreach and engagement, case management, outpatient mental health services, including services for individuals with co-occurring mental health and alcohol and other drug problems, crisis intervention, medication support, housing support, flexible funds, vocational services, educational services, and recreational and social activities. Anka staff are available to consumers on a 24/7 basis. b. Target Population: Adults in Central County who are diagnosed with a serious mental illness, are at or below 300% of the federally defined poverty level, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Payment Limit: FY 18/19 $815,540 d. Number served: In FY 17/18 Anka Central FSP served 39 individuals. e. Outcomes: Below are the FY 17/18 outcomes for Anka Central FSP.  Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis  Reduction of the incidence of restriction Table 1. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 60 Anka Central FSP participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 17-18 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment % change PES episodes 167 102 0.283 0.158 -44.1% Inpatient episodes 55 47 0.061 0.058 -4.92 Inpatient days 567 578 0.783 0.853 +8.93 * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre - enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can B-4 be expressed as: o (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/ (No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate o (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/ (No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate B-5 Asian Community Mental Health Services (ACMHS) www.acmhs.org Point of Contact: Sun Karnsouvong Contact Information: Asian Family Resource Center (AFRC), 12240 San Pablo Avenue, Richmond, CA 94805 (510) 970-9750, Sunk@acmhs.org 1. General Description of the Organization ACMHS provides multicultural and multilingual services, empowering the most vulnerable members of our community to lead healthy, productive and contributing lives. 2. Program: Building Connections (Asian Family Resource Center) - PEI a. Scope of Services: Asian Family Resource Center (AFRC), a satellite site of Asian Community Mental Health Services (ACMHS), will provide comprehensive and culturally-sensitive education and access to mental health services for Asian and Asian Pacific Islander (API) immigrant and refugee communities, especially the Southeast Asian and Chinese population of Cont ra Costa County. ACMHS will employ multilingual and multidisciplinary staff from the communities which they serve. Staff will provide the following scope of services: i. Outreach and Engagement Services: Individual and/or community outreach and engagement to promote mental health awareness, educate community members on signs and symptoms of mental illness, provide mental health workshops, and promote mental health wellness through community events. Engage community members in various activities to screen an d assess for mental illness and/or assist in navigating them into the service systems for appropriate interventions: community integration skills to reduce MH stressors, older adult care giving skills, basic financial management, survival English communication skills, basic life skills, health and safety education and computer education, structured group activities (on topics such as, coping with adolescents, housing issues, aid cut-off, domestic violence, criminal justice issues, health care and disability services), mental health education and awareness, and health/mental health system navigation. ACMHS, in collaboration with community-based organizations, will participate in 3-5 mental health and wellness events to provide wellness and mental health outreach, engagement, and education to immigrants and refugee s in the Contra Costa County. ii. Individual Mental Health Consultation: This service will also be provided to those who are exhibiting early signs of mental illness, to assess needs, identify signs/symptoms of mental health crisis/trauma, provide linkages/referrals or assist in navigation into the mental health system, provide wellness support groups, access essential community resources, and linkage/referral to mental health services. Peer Navigators will be utilized to support participants in accessing services in a culturally sensitive manner. These services will be provided for a period of less than one year unless psychosis is present. ACMHS will serve a minimum of 75 high risk and underserved Southeast Asian community members within a 12 month period, 25 of which will reside in East County with the balance in West and Central County. b. Target Population: Asian and Pacific Islander immigrant and refugee communities (especially Chinese and Southeast Asian population) in Contra Costa County B-6 c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $142,054 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 554 high risk and underserved community members e. Outcomes:  All program participants received system navigation support for mental health treatment, Medi-Cal benefits, and other essential benefits.  Services are offered in the language of the consumer.  Program hosted two community wellness events and psycho -education workshops for the community. B-7 Building Blocks for Kids (BBK) www.bbk-richmond.org Point of Contact: Sheryl Lane Contact Information: 310 9th Street, Richmond, CA 94804 (510) 232-5812, slane@bbk-richmond.org 1. General Description of the Organization Building Blocks for Kids Richmond Collaborative is a place-based initiative with the mission of supporting the healthy development and education of all children, and the self-sufficiency of all families, living in the BBK Collaborative zone located in Richmond, California. BBK’s theory of change is simple and enduring: we believe that providing effective supportive services and investing in individual transformation serves thriving families, which yields community change. 2. Program: Not Me Without Me - PEI a. Scope of Services: Building Blocks for Kids Collaborative, a project of Tides Center, will provide diverse households in Richmond, CA with improved access to mental health education, and mental health support. The Not About Me Without Me prevention and early intervention work addresses MHSA’s PEI goal of providing Prevention services to increase recognition of early signs of mental illness, and intervening early in the onset of a mental illness. Accordingly, the goals are three-fold: (1) working with BBK Zone families to ensure that they are knowledgeable about and have access to a network of supportive and effective mental health information and services; (2) reduce risk for negative outcomes related to untreated mental illness for parents/primary caregivers and children whose risk of developing a serious mental illness is significantly higher than average including cumulative skills-based training opportunities on effective parenting approaches; and, (3) train and support families to s elf-advocate and directly engage the services they need. This work represents an evolution in our Not About Me Without Me approach to service provision by working toward a coordinated, comprehensive system that will support families in not just addressing mental illness and recovering from traumatic experiences but will fortify them to create community change. This system will continue to put resident interests and concerns at the fore and additionally be characterized by a model that enables organizations to: work more effectively and responsively with underserved residents in the Richmond community; improve outcomes; reduce barriers to success; increase provider accountability, and create a truly collaborative and healing environment using strategies that are non- stigmatizing and non-discriminatory. b. Target Population: Children and families living in Central and South Richmond c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $216,897 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 649 Individuals (includes outreach and education events). B-8 e. Outcomes:  Over the course of the 17-18 year, BBK Health and Wellness Team met with 33 community organizations, government agencies and individuals around partnering and collaboration.  BBK held Sanctuary groups and parents who attend have consistently reported th at they learned something new about holistic health, and that they intended to follow up with a partner organization that they learned about through BBK sponsored events.  Summer Program at Belding Garcia Park, and expanded programming to Monterey Pines Apartments in South Richmond. Children participating received at least one healthy meal per day and family members had access to wellness activities and developmental playgroups.  BBK partnered with COPE and Child Abuse Prevention Council to offer weekly evidence-based parenting classes. Care providers developed a strong knowledge base on child development and positive parenting skills. B-9 Center for Human Development (CHD) http://chd-prevention.org/ Point of Contact: David Carrillo, Executive Director Contact Information: 901 Sun Valley Boulevard, Suite 220, Concord, CA 94520 (925) 349-7333, david@chd-prevention.org 1. General Description of the Organization Center for Human Development (CHD) is a community-based organization that offers a spectrum of Prevention and Wellness services for at-risk youth, individuals, families, and communities in the Bay Area. Since 1972 CHD has provided wellness programs and support aimed at empowering people and promoting positive growth. Volunteers work side-by-side with staff to deliver quality programs in schools, clinics, and community sites throughout Contra Costa as well as nearby counties. CHD is known for innovative programs and is committed to improving the quality of life in the communities it serves. 2. Program: African American Wellness Program and Youth Empowerment Program - PEI a. Scope of Services: The Center for Human Development will implement the African American Wellness Program (formerly African American Health Conductor Program) and between the four program components will provide a minimum of 150 unduplicated individuals in Bay Point, Pittsburg, and surrounding communities with mental health resources. The purpose is to increase client emotional wellness; reduce client stress and isolation; and link African American clients, who are underserved due to poor identification of needs and lack of ou treach and engagement to mental health services. Key activities include: outreach at community events, culturally appropriate education on mental health topics through Mind, Body, and Soul support groups and community health education workshops in accessible and non-stigmatizing settings, and navigation assistance for culturally appropriate mental health referrals as early in the onset as possible. The Center for Human Development will implement the Empowerment Program, a Youth Development project, that will provide a minimum of 80 unduplicated LGBTQ youth and their allies in Antioch, Pittsburg, and surrounding East County communities with strength-based educational support services that build on youths’ assets, raise awareness of mental health needs identification, and foster resiliency. Key activities will include: a) Three weekly educational support groups that will promote emotional health and well-being, increase positive identity and self -esteem, and reduce isolation through development of concrete life skills; b) one leadership group that will meet a minimum of twice a month to foster community involvement; and c). referral linkage to culturally appropriate mental health services providers in East County as early in the onset as possible. b. Target Population: Wellness Program: African American residents in East County at risk of developing serious mental illness. Youth Empowerment Program: LGBTQ youth in East County c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $156,936 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 342 individuals were served in both programs combined. 268 in the African American (AA) Wellness Program and 74 in the Empowerment Program. B-10 e. Outcomes: i. Wellness Program  Mind-Body-Soul support groups in Pittsburg and Bay Point throughout the year with topics such as “Depression and Stress”, “Maintaining Emotional Well Being”, “Guide to Vitamins and Minerals in Fresh Foods”, “Self-Care (Physical, Emotional, Mental and Spiritual)”.  Several community health / mental health workshops throughout the year.  100% of the participants in the Mind-Body-Soul peer health education support groups reported and increased wellness (wellbeing) within fiscal year.  Participants in AA Wellness Program received navigational support for their service referral needs. ii. Empowerment Program  LGBTQ youth empowerment support groups in Pittsburg and Antioch throughout the year with topics such as: “Family and Peer Conflict,” “Challenges to Relationships,” “Community Violence and Loss,” “Queer History and Activism,” “Stress, Anxiety and Depression,” “Identity Development and Coming Out.”  85% of the participants in the Empowerment Psycho -Educational Leadership support groups reported an increased sense of emotional health and well- being within fiscal year.  100% of participants in Empowerment in need of counseling services were informed and referred to LGBTQ-sensitive resources available to youth.  36 LGBTQ Youth Support Groups facilitated at Pittsburg High, 26 at Deer Valley High, and 42 at Rivertown Resource Center. B-11 Central County Adult Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) https://cchealth.org/mentalhealth/#simpleContained4 Point of Contact: Kennisha Johnson, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 1420 Willow Pass Road, Suite 200, Concord, CA 94520 (925) 646-5480, Kennisha.Johnson@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The Central Adult Mental Health Clinic operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Adult System of Care, and provides assessments, case management, therapy, groups, psychiatric services, crisis intervention, peer support, housing services, and benefits assistance. W ithin the Adult Mental Health Clinic are the following MHSA funded programs and plan elements: 2. Plan Element: Adult Full Service Partnership Support - CSS Contra Costa Mental Health has dedicated clinical staff at each of the three adult mental health clinics to provide support, coordination and rapid access for full service partners to health and mental health clinic services as needed and appropriate. Rapid Access Clinicians offer drop-in screening and intake appointments to clients who have been discharged from the County Hospital or Psychiatric Emergency Services but who are not open to the county mental health system of care. Rapid Access Clinicians will then refer clients to appropriate services and, when possible, follow-up with clients to ensure a linkage to services was made. If a client meets eligibility criteria for Full Service Partnership services, the Rapid Access Clinician will seek approval to refer the client to Full Service Partnership services. Clinic management acts as the gatekeepers for the Full Service Partnership programs, authorizing referrals and discharges as well as providing clinical oversight to the regional Full Service Partnership programs. Full Service Partnership Liaisons provide support to the Full Service Partnership programs by assisting the programs with referrals and discharges, offering clinical expertise, and helping the programs to navigate the County systems of care. 3. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS General Systems Development strategies are programs or strategies that improve the larger mental health system of care. These programs and strategies expand and enhance the existing service structure to 1) assist consumers in obtaining benefits they are entitled to, educate consumers on how to maximize use of those benefits and manage resources, and 2) provide transportation support for consumers and families. a. Clinic Target Population: Adults aged 18 years and older, who live in Central County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi -Cal benefits. b. Total Number served by clinic: For FY 17-18: Approximately 2,157 Individuals. B-12 Central County Children’s Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) https://cchealth.org/mentalhealth/#simpleContained4 Point of Contact: Betsy Hanna, Psy.D, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 2425 Bisso Lane, Suite 200, Concord, CA 94520 (925) 521-5767, Betsy.Hanna@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health and Alcohol & Other Drugs into a single system of care. The Central Children’s Mental Health Clinic operates within Contra Costa Behavioral Health’s Children’s System of Care, and provides psychiatric and outpatient services, family partners, and Wraparound services. Within the Children’s Mental Health Clinic are the following MHSA funded plan elements: 2. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS General Systems Development strategies are programs or strategies that improve the larger mental health system of care. These programs and strategies expand and enhance the existing service structure to assist consumers in the following areas:  Family Partners and Wraparound Facilitation. The family partners assist families with advocacy, transportation assistance, navigation of the service system, and offer support in the home, community, and county service sites. Family partners support families with children of all ages who are receiving services in the children. Family partners are located in each of the regional clinics f or children and adult services, and often participate on wraparound teams following the evidence -based model.  A Clinical Specialist in each regional clinic who provides technical assistance and oversight of evidence-based practices in the clinic.  Support for full service partners. a. Target Population: Children aged 17 years and younger, who live in Central County, are diagnosed with a serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. b. Number served by clinic: For FY 17/18: Approximately 969 Individuals. B-13 Child Abuse Prevention Council (CAPC) www.capc-coco.org Point of Contact: Carol Carrillo Contact Information: 2120 Diamond Boulevard #120, Concord, CA 94520 (925) 798-0546, ccarrillo@capc-coco.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Child Abuse Prevention Council has worked for many years to prevent the maltreatment of children. Through providing education programs and support services, linking families to community resources, mentoring, and steering county-wide collaborative initiatives, CAPC has led Contra Costa County’s efforts to protect children. It continually evaluates its programs in order to provide the best possible support to the families of Contra Costa County. 2. Program: The Nurturing Parenting Program - PEI a. Scope of Services: The Child Abuse Prevention Council of Contra Costa will provide an evidence-based curriculum of culturally, linguistically, and developmentally appropriate, Spanish speaking families in East County, and Central County’s Monument Corridor. Four classes will be provided for 12-15 parents each session and approximately 15 children each session 0 -12 years of age. The 22-week curriculum will immerse parents in ongoing training, free of charge, designed to build new skills and alter old behavioral patterns intended to strengthen families and support the healthy development of their children in their own neighborhoods. Developmental assessments and referral services will be provided to each family served in the program using strategies that are non-stigmatizing and non- discriminatory. Families will be provided with linkages to mental health and other services as appropriate. Providing the Nurturing Parenting Program in the Monument Corridor of Concord and East County allows underserved parents and children access to mental health support in their own communities and in their primary language. b. Target Population: Latino children and their families in Central and East County. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $125,109 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 140 parents and children e. Outcomes:  Four 22-week classes in Central and East County serving parents and their children.  All parent participants completed pre- and post-tests. All parents improved their scores on at least four out of five ‘parenting constructs’ (appropriate expec tations, empathy, discipline, self-awareness, and empowerment). B-14 Community Options for Families and Youth, Inc. (COFY, Inc.) www.cofy.org Point of Contact: David Bergesen Contact Information: 3478 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 260, Pleasant Hill CA 94523 (925) 943-1794, d.bergesen@cofy.org 1. General Description of the Organization Community Options for Families and Youth (COFY) is a multi-disciplinary provider of mental health services. COFY’s mission is to work with youth whose high -intensity behaviors place them at risk of hospitalization or residential treatment. Their mental health clinicians work collaboratively with caregivers, educators, and social service professionals to help exasperated families restore empathic relationships and maintain placement for their children. 2. Program: Multisystemic Therapy (MST) – Full Service Partnership (FSP) - CSS Multisystemic Therapy (“MST”) in an intensive family and community based treatment that addresses the multiple determinants of serious anti -social behavior. The MST approach views individuals as being surrounded by a network of interconnected systems that encompasses individual, family, and extra familial (peers, school, community) factors. Intervention may be necessary in any one or a combination of these systems, and using the strengths of each system to facilitate positive change. The intervention strives to promote behavioral change in the youth’s natural environment. Family sessions are provided over a three to five month period. These sessions are based on nationally recognized evidence based practices designed to decrease rates of anti-social behavior, improve school performance and interpersonal skills, and reduce out-of-home placements. The ultimate goal is to empower families to build a healthier environment through the mobilization of existing child, family, and community resou rces. a. Scope of Services: Services include but are not limited to outreach and engagement, case management, outpatient mental health services, crisis intervention, collateral services, flexible funds. COFY MST staff must be available to consumer on a 24/7 basis. b. Target Population: Children who have a serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness, and have been identified as a juvenile offender or are at risk of involvement with Probation due to delinquent behavior. Services are county-wide. c. Payment Limit: FY 18/19 $650,000 d. Number served: In FY17/18 COFY FSP served 97 individuals. e. Outcomes:  Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis  Reduction of the incidence of restriction  Increase in incidence of psychiatric crisis B-15 Table 1. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 139 Community Options for Families and Youth, Inc. participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 17-18 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 2 5 0.002 0.005 +15% Inpatient episodes 0 1 0.000 0.001 0 Inpatient days 0 6 0.000 0.004 0 JACS 33 24 0.037 0.026 -29.7% B-16 Contra Costa Crisis Center www.crisis-center.org Point of Contact: Tom Tamura, Executive Director Contact Information: P.O. Box 3364 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 (925) 939-1916, Ext. 107, TomT@crisis-center.org 1. General Description of the Organization The mission of the Contra Costa Crisis Center is to keep people alive and safe, help them through crises, and connect them with culturally relevant resources in the community. 2. Program: Suicide Prevention Crisis Line - PEI a. Scope of Services:  Contra Costa Crisis Center will provide services to prevent suicides throughout Contra Costa County by operating a nationally certified 24-hour suicide prevention hotline. The hotline lowers the risk of suicide by assuring 24-hour access to real time services rendered by a trained crisis counselor who not only assesses suicide and self-harm lethality and provides intervention, but links callers to numerous mental health treatment options. This linkage occurs via referral to culturally relevant mental health services as well as provides REAL TIME warm transfer to those services when appropriate. Because the hotline operates continuously regardless of time or day, all callers receive timely intervention and access to service WHEN THEY NEED IT and immediately upon their request. The Crisis Center’s programs are implemented (including agency program and hiring policies, bylaws, etc.) in a welcoming and intentionally non-discriminatory manner. Much of our outreach activities and staff/volunteer training activities center around increased awareness of myriad mental health issues, as well as mental health services, consumer stigma reduction in an effort to increase community comfort at accessing services and in referring those in need.  Key activities include: answering local calls to toll-free suicide hotlines, including a Spanish-language hotline; the Crisis Center will maintain an abandonment rate at or below national standard; assisting callers whose primary language other than English or Spanish through use of a tele-interpreter service; conducting a lethality assessment on each crisis call consistent with national standards; making follow-up calls to persons (with their consent) who are at medium to high risk of suicide with the goal of 99% one-month follow up survival rate; and training all crisis line staff and volunteers in a consistent and appropriate model consistent with AAS (American Association of Suicidology) certification. As a result of these service activities, >99% of people who call the crisis line and are assessed to be at medium to high risk of suicide will be survivors one month later; the Crisis Center will continuously recruit and train crisis line volunteers to a minimum pool of 25 multi-lingual/culturally competent individuals within the contract year; Spanish-speaking counselors will be provided 80 hours per week.  The Crisis Center will provide community outreach and education about how to access crisis services. Priority and vigorous outreach efforts are directed to underserved and hard to reach populations such as youth, elderly, isolated, persons with limited English, LGBQT, etc. and focus changes as community needs emerge and are identified. B-17  The Crisis Center will liaison with the County Coroner to provide referrals for grieving survivors (and mitigating contagion).  In Partnership with County Behavioral Health, the Contra Costa Crisis Center will co- chair the Countywide Suicide Prevention Committee. b. Target Population: Contra Costa County residents in crisis. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $310,685 d. Number served: In FY17-18: 30,932 crisis calls were fielded. e. Outcomes:  Spanish language coverage was provided 80 hours/week  Call abandonment rate was 1.5%  Lethality assessments were provided for 100% of callers rated mid to high level risk.  Responded to 1,345 calls from people in crisis, suicidal or experiencing mental health issues.  A pool of 25 volunteers was maintained, and 2 volunteer trainings were offered during the year B-18 Contra Costa Interfaith Housing (CCIH) http://ccinterfaithhousing.org/ Point of Contact: Sara Marsh, Director of Support Services Contact Information: 399 Taylor Boulevard, Suite 115, Pleasant Hill, CA 94530 (925) 944-2244, Sara@ccinterfaithhousing.org 1. General Description of the Organization Contra Costa Interfaith Housing (CCIH) provides permanent, affordable housing and vital, on-site support services to homeless and at-risk families and individuals in Contra Costa County. By providing services on-site at the housing programs where individuals and families live, we maximize timeliness and access to services. This model also minimizes the discriminatory barriers to support, due to lack of transportation or other resources. 2. Program: Strengthening Vulnerable Families - PEI a. Scope of Services:  Contra Costa Interfaith Housing, Inc. (CCIH) will provide an array of on-site, on- demand, culturally appropriate and evidence-based approaches for its “Strengthening Vulnerable Families” program, which serves formerly homeless families and families at risk for homelessness and for m ental illness. CCIH provides services on-site in affordable housing settings and case managers are available fulltime to residents. This structure helps to eliminate barriers to timely access to services. Culturally aware youth enrichment and case management providers assist youth and families to access a multitude of community services, including mental health treatment. By incorporating these services among general support, potential stigma related to mental health referrals is reduced. By providing services to all residents, potential biased or discriminatory service delivery is avoided.  At Garden Park Apartments in Pleasant Hill, on-site services are delivered to 28 formerly homeless families. Programming at this site is designed to improve parenting skills, child and adult life skills, and family communication skills. Program elements help families stabilize; parents achieve the highest level of self -sufficiency possible, and provide early intervention for the youth in these families who are at risk for ongoing problems due to mental illness, domestic violence, substance addiction, poverty and inadequate life skills. Key activities include: case management, family support, harm reduction support, academic 4-day-per-week homework club, early childhood programming, teen support group, and community-building events.  CCIH will also provide an Afterschool Program and mental health and case management services at two sites in East Contra Costa County: Bella Monte Apartments in Bay Point and Los Medanos Village in Pittsburg. These complexes offer permanent affordable housing to low-income families at risk for homelessness. The total number of households offered services under this grant was 274. Anticipated impact for services at these sites will be improved school performance by the youth and improved parenting skills and mental health for these families due to lowered stress regarding their housing status (eviction prevention) and increased access to resources and benefits. Increased recognition of early signs of mental illness will be achieved as well, due to the on -site case management staff’s ability to respond to possible family concerns about family members’ mental health, as they arise. B-19  CCIH staff is also able to help community providers be aware of early signs of mental illness in their clients, and support sensitive care and timely treatment for these issues. b. Target Population: Formerly homeless/at-risk families and youth. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $72,100 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 428 clients e. Outcomes:  Improved school functioning and regular attendance of school-aged youth in afterschool programs.  Improved family functioning and confidence as measured by the self -sufficiency matrix (SSM) and individual family goals and eviction prevention. (SSM evaluates 20 life skill areas including mental health, physical health, child custody, employment, housing stability). B-20 Counseling Options Parent Education (C.O.P.E.) Family Support Center http://copefamilysupport.org/ Point of Contact: Cathy Botello Contact Information: 2280 Diamond Blvd #460, Concord, Ca 945 20. (925) 689-5811 cathy.botello@copefamilysupport.org 1. General Description of the Organization C.O.P.E.’s mission is to prevent child abuse by providing comprehensive support services to strengthen family relationships and bonds, empower parents, encourage healthy relationships, and cultivate nurturing family units to encourage an optimal environment for the healthy growth and development of parents and children through parent education. 2. Programs: Triple P Positive Parenting Education and Support -PEI a. Scope of Services: In partnership with First 5 Contra Costa Children and Families Commission and Contra Costa County Behavioral Health Services, C.O.P.E. is funded to deliver Positive Parenting Program classes to parents of children ages 0–17. The C.O.P.E Family Support Center will provide approximately 21 services using the evidence- based Triple P — Positive Parenting Program Level 2 Seminar, Level 3 Primary Care, Level 4 Group, Level 5 Pathways, Level 5 Enhanced, Level 5 Transitions, Level 5 Lifestyle multi-family support groups, at low or no cost to parents of children two to seventeen years of age. The program utilizes an evidence based self-regulatory model that focuses on strengthening the positive attachment between parents and children by building a parent’s capacity for the following five aspects: i. Self-sufficiency - having the ability to use one’s own resources to independently solve problems and decrease reliance on others; ii. Self-efficacy - having the confidence in performing daily parenting tasks; iii. Self-management - having the tools and skills needed to enable change; iv. Personal agency - attributing the changes made in the family to own effort or the effort of one’s child; v. Problem-solving - having the ability to apply principles and strategies, including creating parenting plans to manage current or future problems. All classes are available in Spanish, Arabic, Farsi and/or English. In order to outreach to the community about the curriculum and benefits of Triple P Parenting, C.O.P.E. provides management briefings, orientation and community awareness meetings to partner agencies. C.O.P.E. supports and organizes annual trainings for other partnering agencies, including pre-accreditation trainings, fidelity oversight and clinical and peer support in an effort to build and maintain a pool of Triple P practitioners. b. Target Population: Contra Costa County parents of children and youth with identified special needs. Our targeted population includes caregivers residing in underserved communities throughout Contra Costa County. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $245,863 (ages 6–17), through First Five: $81,955 (ages 0–5). d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 337 B-21 e. Outcomes:  Offered Triple P evidenced based parenting classes at 27 site locations across the county  Pre and Post Test Survey results indicate program participants showed a 41% decrease in depression, 34% decrease in anxiety, and 33% decrease in overall stress  Access and linkage to on-going treatment supported through warm hand off referrals for housing, vocational, legal and mental health services  Program served 246 individuals in parenting classes, and 91 individuals for case management services. B-22 Crestwood Behavioral Health, Inc. https://crestwoodbehavioralhealth.com/ Point of Contact: Travis Curran, Campus Administrator for Pleasant Hill Campus Contact Information: 550 Patterson Boulevard, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 (925) 938-8050, tcurran@cbhi.net 1. General Description of the Organization The mission at Crestwood Healing Center is to partner with Contra Costa County clients, employees, families, business associates, and the broader community in serving individuals affected by mental health issues. Together, they enhance quality of life, social interaction, community involvement and empowerment of mental health clients toward the goal of creating a fulfilling life. Clients are assisted and encouraged to develop life skills, participate in community based activities, repair or enhance primary relationships, and enjoy leisure activities. A supportive, compassionate , and inclusive program increases motivation and commitment. 2. Program: The Pathway Program (Mental Health Housing Services – CSS The Pathway Program provides psychosocial rehabilitation for 16 clients who have had little, if any, previous mental health treatment. The program provides intensive skills training to promote independent living. Many clients complete their high school requirements, enroll in college or are participating in competitive employment by the end of treatment. a. Scope of Services:  Case management  Mental health services  Medication management  Crisis intervention  Adult residential b. Target Population: Adults aged 18 years and older, who live in Central County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $1,210,356 d. Number served For FY 17/18: 64 beds available at The Bridge in Pleasant Hill. 30 beds available at Our House in Vallejo. e. Outcomes: To be determined. B-23 Desarrollo Familiar, Inc. (Familias Unidas) http://www.familias-unidas.org/ Point of Contact: Lorena Huerta, Executive Director. Contact Information: 205 39th Street, Richmond, CA 94805 (510) 412–5930, LHuerta@Familias-Unidas.org. 1. General Description of the Organization Familias Unidas exists to improve wellness and self -sufficiency in Latino and other communities. The agency accomplishes this by delivering quality mental health counseling, service advocacy, and information/referral services. Familias Unidas programs include: mental health, education and prevention, youth development, and wrap-around services. 2. Program: Familias Unidas – Full Service Partnership - CSS Familias Unidas provides a comprehensive range of services and supports in Contra Costa County to adults with serious emotional disturbance/serious mental illness who are homeless or at serious risk of homelessness. Services are based in West Contra Costa County. a. Scope of Services:  Services are provided using an integrated team approach, based on a modified Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model of care. Services include:  Outreach and engagement  Case management  Outpatient Mental Health Services, including services for individuals with co- occurring mental health & alcohol and other drug problems  Crisis Intervention  Collateral services  Medication support (may be provided by County Physician)  Housing support  Flexible funds  Contractor must be available to the consumer on a 24/7 basis b. Target Population: Adults in West County, who are diagnosed with a serious mental illness, are homeless or at imminent risk of homelessness, are at or below 300% of the federally defined poverty level, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Payment Limit: FY 18/19 $219,708 d. Number served: For FY 17/18: 17 Individuals e. Outcomes: For FY 17/18:  Program participants will experience a net reduction in their Psychiatric Emergency Services utilization rate of at least 40% when the annual utilization rate for the clients’ most recent 12 months of service, or total number of months the client has been enrolled for less than 12 months, is compared to the pre-enrollment rate.*  Program participants will experience a net reduction in their inpatient utilization rate of at least 60% when the annual utilization rate for the clients’ most recent 12 months of service, or total number of months if a client has been enrolled for less than 12 months, is compared to the pre-enrollment rate.*  75% of FSP participants placed into housing will receive housing support to maintain housing stability or be progressively placed into more independent living environments, as appropriate. B-24  75% of FSP participants will rank Familias Unidas FSP services with a score of 4 or higher in the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), twice annually, or upon client discharge from the program.  Less than 25% of active Familias Unidas FSPs will be arrested or incarcerated post - enrollment measured at the end of the fiscal year.  Collect baseline data utilizing an engagement in meaningful activity/quality of life assessment tool (tool to be determined).  No change in incidence of psychiatric crisis  Increase of the incidence of restriction Table 1. Pre-and post-enrollment utilization rates for 23 Familias Unidas (Desarrollo Familiar, Inc.) FSP Participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 17-18 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- % change Enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 23 15 0.094 0.058 -38.3% Inpatient episodes 9 2 0.033 0.007 -78.8% Inpatient days 36 366 0.130 1.326 +920% * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre - enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: o (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/ (No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate o (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/ (No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate B-25 Divine’s Home Point of Contact: Maria Riformo Contact Information: 2430 Bancroft Lane, San Pablo, CA 94806 (510) 222-4109, HHailey194@aol.com 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with Divine’s Home, a licensed board and care operator, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Cares – MHSA Housing Services - CSS a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to:  Medication management  Nutritional meal planning  Assistance with laundry  Transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments  Improving socialization  Assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.)  Encouraging meaningful activity  Other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 60 years and older, who live in Western Contra Costa County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 5,340 d. Number served: For FY 17/18: Capacity of 6 beds. B-26 East County Adult Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) https://cchealth.org/mentalhealth/#simpleContained4 Point of Contact: Beverly Fuhrman, Program Manager Contact Information: 2311 Loveridge Road, Pittsburg, CA 94565 (925) 431-2621, Beverly.Fuhrman@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization East County Adult Mental Health Services operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Adult System of Care. Services are provided within a Care Team model that is comprised of a team of psychiatrists, nurses, therapists, community support workers and family support worker. The initial assessment, Co-Visit, is provided jointly by a psychiatrist and a therapist where both mental health and medication needs are addressed at this initial visit. Other services include crisis intervention, individual/group therapy, case management, housing services, benefits assistance, vocational services, and linkage to community-based programs and agencies. 2. Plan Element: Adult Full Service Partnership Support - CSS Contra Costa Mental Health has dedicated clinicians at each of the three adult mental health clinics to provide support, coordination and rapid access for full service partners to health and mental health clinic services as needed and appropriate. Rapid Access Clinicians offer drop-in screening and intake appointments to clients who have been discharged from the County Hospital or Psychiatric Emergency Services but who are not open to the county mental health system of care. Rapid Access Clinicians will then refer clients to appropriate services and, when possible, follow-up with clients to ensure a linkage to services was made. If a client meets eligibility criteria for Full Service Partnership services, the Rapid Access Clinician will seek approval to refer the client to Full Service Partnership services. Clinic management act as the gatekeepers for the Full Service Partnership programs, authorizing referrals and discharges as well as providing clinical oversight to the regional Full Service Partnership programs. Full Service Partnership Liaisons provide support to the Full Service Partnership programs by assisting the programs with referrals and discharges, offering clinical expertise, and helping the programs to navigate the County systems of care. 3. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS General Systems Development strategies are programs or strategies that improve the larger mental health system of care. These programs and strategies expand and enhance the existing service structure to assist consumers in 1) obtaining benefits they entitled to, educate consumers on how to maximize use of those benefits and manage resources, and 2) provide transportation support for consumers and families. a. Clinic Target Population: Adults aged 18 years and older, who live in East County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and a re uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. b. Total Number served by clinic: For FY 17-18 Approximately 2,231 Individuals. 4. Plan Element: Coaching to Wellness - INN The Coaching to Wellness program provides an additional level of support for adult mental health consumers with certain chronic health conditions through intensive peer and nurse support. With components from intensive peer support coupled with leveraging existing resources in the County, the Coaching to Wellness program provides a holistic team approach to providing care to our consumers. The goals of the B-27 program are to: 1) Improve consumer perception of their own wellness and well-being; 2) Increase healthy behaviors and decrease symptoms for consumers; and 3) Increase cross-service collaboration among primary and mental health care staff. a. Target Population: Adults aged 18 years and older who are currently receiving psychiatric-only services at a County-operated Adult clinic; Diagnosed with a serious mental illness (but at a stage to be engaged in recover); Diagnosed with a chronic health risk condition of cardiac, metabolic, respiratory, and/or have weight issues; Expressed an interest in the program; and indicated a moderate to high composite score on mental health and medical levels of support needed. b. Total Budget: $222,752 c. MHSA-funded Staff: 5.0 Full-time equivalents d. Total Number served: For FY 17/18: 46 individuals e. Outcomes: Evaluation of the program includes pre- and post-surveys that measure key indicators in areas such as: perceived recovery, functioning, and quality of life. Self-rated health and mental health data is collected by the Wellness Coaches and Nurses at most individual contacts and vitals collected and levels of support assessed by the Wellness Nurses as needed. Satisfaction and achievement on self - identified wellness goals recorded at post-program. Other proposed indicators include primary care and mental health appointment attendance, and utilization rate of involuntary psychiatric emergency admissions and/or acute psychiatric admissions. B-28 East County Children’s Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) https://cchealth.org/mentalhealth/#simpleContained4 Point of Contact: Eileen Brooks, Program Manager Contact Information: 2335 Country Hills Drive, Antioch, CA 94509 (925) 608-8735, Eileen.Brooks@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The East Children’s Mental Health Clinic operates within Contra Costa Behavioral Health’s Children’s System of Care, and provides psychiatric and outpatient services, family partners, and wraparound services. Within the Children’s Behavioral Health Clinic are the following MHSA funded plan elements: 2. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS General Systems Development strategies are programs or strategies that improve the larger mental health system of care. These programs and strategies expand and enhance the existing service structure to assist consumers in the following areas:  Family Partners and Wraparound Facilitation. The family partners assist families with advocacy, transportation assistance, navigation of the service system, and offer support in the home, community, and county service sites. Family partners support families with children of all ages who are receiving services in the clinic. Family partners are located in each of the regional clinics for children and adult services, and often participate on wraparound teams following the evidence -based model.  A Clinical Specialist/EBP Team Leader in each regional clinic who provides technical assistance, clinical consultation, and oversight of evidence-based practices in the clinic.  Support for full service partnership programs. a. Target Population: Children and youth aged 5 through 22 years, who live in East County, are diagnosed with a serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. b. Number served by clinic: For FY 17/18: Approximately 774 Individuals. B-29 First Five Contra Costa http://www.first5coco.org/ Point of Contact: Wanda Davis Contact Information: 1486 Civic Court, Concord CA 94520 (925) 771-7328, wdavis@firstfivecc.org 1. General Description of the Organization The mission of First 5 Contra Costa is to foster the optimal development of childre n, prenatal to five years of age. In partnership with parents, caregivers, communities, public and private organizations, advocates, and county government, First Five supports a comprehensive, integrated set of sustainable programs, services, and activitie s designed to improve the health and well-being of young children, advance their potential to succeed in school, and strengthen the ability of their families and caregivers to provide for their physical, mental, and emotional growth. 2. Programs: Triple P Positive Parenting Program - PEI a. Scope of Services: First Five Contra Costa and Contra Costa Behavioral Health jointly fund the Triple P Positive Parenting Program that is provided to parents of age 0 - 5 children. The intent is to reduce the maltreatment of children by increasing a family’s ability to manage their children’s behavior and to normalize the need for support to develop positive parenting skills. The Triple P program provides timely access to service by placing the classes throughout county and offering classes year round. The Program has been proven effective across various cultures, and ethnic groups. Triple P is an evidence based practice that provides preventive and intervention support. First 5 Contra Costa provides over-site of the subcontractor, works closely with the subcontractor on program implementation, identifying, recruiting and on-boarding new Triple P Practitioners, management of the database, review of outcome measurements, and quality improvement efforts. The partnership is intended to provide outreach for increasing recognition of early signs of mental illness. b. Target Population: Contra Costa County parents of at risk 0–5 children. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $81,955 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 182 parents of children age 0–5 yrs. (C.O.P.E.) e. Outcomes:  Completed 17 parenting classes for East and West County parents of children age 0–5 (C.O.P.E.) i. Clinical Highlights for FY 17-18:  Depression – parents self-report on symptoms such as hopelessness and dysphoria, decreased by 41% overall  Anxiety – parents self-report on symptoms such as anxiousness and situational anxiety, decreased by 34% overall  Stress – parents self-report on symptoms such as nervousness, muscle tension and inability to relax, decreased by 33% overall  Intensity of Behavior Problems which measures the frequency of each problem behavior, decreased by 19% as indicated by the chart above  Behavior Problems which reflect parent tolerance of the behaviors and the distress, decreased by 43% B-30 First Hope (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) http://www.firsthopeccc.org/ Point of Contact: Jude Leung, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 391 Taylor Boulevard Suite 100, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 (925) 608-6550, YatMingJude.Leung@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The First Hope program operates within Contra Costa Behavioral Health’s Children’s System of Care but is a hybrid program serving both children and young adults. 2. Program: First Hope: Early Identification and Intervention in Psychosis - PEI a. Scope of Service: The mission of the First Hope program is to reduce the incidence of psychosis and the secondary disability of those developing a psychotic disorder in Contra Costa County through:  Early Identification of young people between ages 12 and 25 who are showing very early signs of psychosis and are determined to be at risk for developing a serious mental illness.  Engaging and providing immediate treatment to those identified as “at risk”, while maintaining progress in school, work and social relationships.  Providing an integrated, multidisciplinary team approach including psychoeducation, multi-family groups, individual and family therapy, case management, occupational therapy, supported education and vocation, family partnering, and psychiatric services within a single service model.  Outreach and community education with the following goals: 1) identifying all young people in Contra Costa County who are at risk for developing a psychotic disorder and would benefit from early intervention services; and 2) reducing stigma and barriers that prevent or delay seeking treatment through educational presentations. b. Target Population: 12-25 year old transition age youth and their families c. Total Budget: FY 18-19: $2,463,474 d. Staff: 14 FTE full time equivalent multi-disciplinary staff e. Number served: FY 17-18: 118 clients and their families served (assessments and clinical services). On any given day, between 55 and 70 clients and their families are open to services. Additionally, First Hope provided ongoing outreach education reaching 224 participants in the community and 179 initial phone screenings and consultation to at risk individuals, families, or providers. f. Outcomes:  Help clients manage Clinical High Risk symptoms  Help clients maintain progress in school, work, relationships  Reduce the stigma associated with symptoms  Prevent development of psychotic illnesses  Reduce necessity to access psychiatric emergency services/ inpatient care g. Long Term Public Health Outcomes:  Reduce conversion rate from Clinical High Risk symptoms to schizophrenia  Reduce incidence of psychotic illnesses in Contra Costa County B-31  Increase community awareness and acceptance of the value and advantages of seeking mental health care early B-32 Forensic Mental Health (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Marie Scannell, Program Manager Contact Information: 1430 Willow Pass Road, Suite 100, Concord CA 94520 (925) 288-3915, Marie.Scannell@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The Forensic Services team operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Adult System of Care, and works closely with Adult Probation, the courts, and local police departments. 2. Program: Forensic Services - CSS The Forensics Services team is a multidisciplinary team comprised of mental health clinical specialists, registered nurses and community support workers. The purpose of the team is to engage and offer voluntary services to participants who are seriously and persistently mentally ill and are involved in the criminal justice system. Forensic Services hosts office hours at the three regional probation offices to enhance the opportunity for screening and service participation. The co-located model allows for increased collaboration among the participants, service providers, and Deputy Probation Officers. The Forensic MHCS, CSWs, and nurses coordinate to offer Case Management services, individual therapy, and evidence based group therapies (CBSST, Seeking Safety and WRAP). WRAP services are also provided on an individual basis. In addition, monthly Case Coordination meetings are held for each probation department (east, west, and central) with the Probation Officers, Forensic MH staff, and other community providers. These meetings are used to discuss and coordinate services for individual probationers that are facing challenges in engaging and utilizing services. The forensic staff participates in continuation of care by initiating contacts with probationers while in custody. These contact are both pre-release and during probation violations. In addition the Forensic CSW and clinicians provides WRAP & CBSST groups in MDF. The Forensic MHCS located at east county probation has begun coordination of, and providing, services for the TAY population in conjunction with re- entry services. AOT: The Forensic Mental Health Team (FMHT) manages and provides an Assistant Outpatient Treatment Program, aka Laura Law AB 1421. The FMHT works in conjunction with Mental Health Systems (MHS) to provide contracted services. All requests for potential AOT services come through the FMHT. The FMHT is responsible to determine if the requestors meet the requirements as stated in the Welfare and Institution code and if the person for whom the request is being made meets the 9 criteria for eligible AOT services. The FMHT also provides linkage to other services for individuals that do not meet all the criteria for AOT. B-33 a. Scope of Services: Authorized in Fiscal Year 2011-12 four clinical specialists were funded by MHSA to join Forensics Services Team. This team works very closely with the criminal justice system to assess referrals for serious mental illness, provide rapid access to a treatment plan, and work as a team to provide the appropriate mental health, substance abuse and housing services needed. b. Target Population: Individuals who are seriously and persistently mentally ill who are on probation and at risk of re-offending and incarceration. c. Budget: $982,245 d. MHSA-Funded Staff: 4.0 Full-time equivalent e. Number Served in FY 17/18: 270 B-34 Fred Finch Youth Center https://www.fredfinch.org/ Point of Contact: Kimberly Powers, LMFT, Program Director Contact Information: 2523 El Portal Drive, Suite 201, San Pablo, CA 94806 (510) 439–3130 Ext. 6107, kimberlypowers@fredfinch.org 1. General Description of the Organization Fred Finch Youth Center (FFYC) seeks to provide innovative, effective, caring mental health and social services to children, young adults, and their families that allow them to build on their strengths, overcome challenges, and live healthy and productive lives. FFYC serves children, adolescents, young adults, and families facing complex life challenges. Many have experienced trauma and abuse; live at or below the poverty line; have been institutionalized or incarcerated; have a family member that has been involved in the criminal justice system; have a history of substance abuse; or have experienced discrimination or stigma. 2. Program: Contra Costa Transition Age Youth Full Service Partnership - CSS Fred Finch Youth Center is the lead agency that collaborates with the Contra Costa Youth Continuum of Services, The Latina Center and Contra Costa Mental Health to provide a Full Service Partnership program for Transition Age Youth in West and Central Contra Costa County. a. Scope of Services: Services will be provided using an integrated team approach, based on a modified Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) model of care. The team includes a Personal Service Coordinator working in concert with a multi- disciplinary team of staff, including a Peer Mentor and Family Partner, a Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner, staff with various clinical specialties, including co-occurring substance disorder and bi-lingual capacity. Services include:  Outreach and engagement  Case management  Outpatient Mental Health Services, including services for individuals with co- occurring mental health & alcohol and other drug problems  Crisis Intervention  Collateral  Medication support (may be provided by County Physician)  Housing support  Flexible funds  Referrals to Money Management services as needed  Supported Employment Services  Available to consumer on 24/7 basis a. Target Population: Young adults with serious mental illness or serious emotional disturbance. These young adults exhibit key risk factors of homelessness, limited English proficiency, co-occurring substance abuse, exposure to trauma, repeated school failure, multiple foster-care or family-caregiver placements, and experience with the juvenile justice system and/or Psychiatric Emergency Services. FFYC serves Central and West County. b. Payment Limit: FY 18/19 $1,485,941 c. Number served: For FY 17/18: 54 d. Outcomes: For FY 17/18:  Reduction in incidence of psychiatric hospitalizations B-35  School enrollment increased in the Fall and Housing decreased.  Although Employment dropped somewhat, Competitive Employment remained steady.  ANSA data: Individual Strengths and Depression Domains goals were met, exceeding the targeted goal percentage. Life Domain Functioning, Behavioral/Emotional Needs and Improvement in at least one Domain all decreased respectively and appear in range of meeting the stated goal.  Continued contributing factors include: Active Socialization and Community building efforts that address communication/interpersonal skills, symptom management, identity development and holistic incorporation such as Workshops that target specific needs such as: Planned Parenthood (Healthy Sexuality) & Nutrition and bringing in 2018; New Laws, Immigration, Current Events Impact, etc. CCTAY continues to offer social outings, community connection, advocacy and participant led activities to promote confidence, build self-esteem, leadership and independent living skills, communication, etc. in order to increase overall treatment success and outcomes. Table 1. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 56 Fred Finch FSP participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 17-18 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- % change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 50 25 0.101 0.046 -54.5% Inpatient episodes 24 6 0.050 0.013 -74% Inpatient days 162 30 0.334 0.001 -99.7% * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre - enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: o (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/(No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate o (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/(No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate B-36 George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) https://cchealth.org/centers/mwc.php Point of Contact: Thomas Tighe, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 25 Allen Street, Martinez CA 94553 (925) 890-5932, Thomas.Tighe@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center under the Contra Costa Health Services Hospital and Clinics Division. 2. Program: George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center (Formerly the Assessment and Recovery Center) - CSS a. Scope of Services: The George and Cynthia Miller Wellness Center (Miller Wellness Center) provides a number of services to the Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services’ system of care consumers that includes the diversion of children and adults from Psychiatric Emergency Services (PES). Children and adults who are evaluated at PES may step-down to the Miller Wellness Center if they do not need hospital level of care. The Miller Wellness Center offers urgent same -day appointments for individuals who are not open to the Contra Costa Mental Health System, or who have disconnected from care after previously being seen. Services include brief family therapy, medication refills, substance abuse counseling, and general non-acute assistance. In addition, the Center provides appointments for patients post psychiatric inpatient discharge. This provides the opportunity for a successful transition that ensures that medications are obtained and appointments are scheduled in the home clinic. The behavioral health service site is located in a Federally Qualified Health Center with separate entrances from the physical health side. b. Target Population: Children and adults who are being diverted from PES, transition from inpatient, and consumers not yet connected to the outpatient system of care. c. Total Budget: $319,819 d. Staff funded through MHSA: 3 FTE – A Program Manager, and two Community Support Workers. e. Number Served: To Be Determined f. Outcomes: To Be Determined B-37 James Morehouse Project (JMP) at El Cerrito High, YMCA East Bay http://www.jamesmorehouseproject.org/ Point of Contact: Jenn Rader, Director Contact Information: 540 Ashbury Avenue, El Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 231-1437, jenn@jmhop.org 1. General Description of the Organization The James Morehouse Project (JMP) works to create positive change within El Cerrito High School through health services, counseling, youth leadership projects and campus-wide school climate initiatives. Founded in 1999, the JMP assumes youth have the skills, values and commitments to create change in their own lives and the life of the school community. The JMP partners with community and government agencies, local providers and universities. 2. Program: James Morehouse Project (JMP) - PEI a. Scope of Services: The James Morehouse Project (JMP), a school health center at El Cerrito High School (fiscal sponsor: YMCA of the East Bay), offers access to care and wellness through a wide range of innovative youth development programs for 300 multicultural youth in West Contra Costa County. Through strategic partnerships with community-based agencies, local universities and county programs, JMP offers three main program areas that include: Counseling & Youth Development, Restorative School-Wide Activities, and Medical & Dental Services. Key activities designed to improve students’ well-being and success in school include: AOD Prevention; Migrations/Journeys (immigration/acculturation); Bereavement Groups (loss of a loved one); Culture Keepers (youth of color leadership); Discovering the Realities of Our Communities (DROC – environmental and societal factors that contribute to substance abuse); Peer Conflict Mediation; and Dynamic Mindfulness. As an on-campus student health center, the JMP is uniquely situated to maximize access and linkage to mental health services for young people from underserved communities. The JMP connects directly with young people at school and provides timely, ongoing and consistent services to youth on -site. Because the JMP also offers a wide range of youth development programs and activities, JMP space has the energy and safety of a youth center. For that reason, students do not experience stigma around coming into the health center or accessing services. b. Target Population: At-risk students at El Cerrito High School c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $102,900 d. Numbers Served: For FY 17-18: 413 e. Outcomes:  Stronger connection to caring adults/peers (build relationships with caring adult(s), peers) for participating youth.  Increased well-being (diminished perceptions of stress/anxiety, improvement in family/loved-one relationships, increased self-confidence, etc.) for participating youth.  Strengthened connection to school (more positive assessment of teacher/staff relationships, positive peer connections, ties with caring adults) for participating youth.  Reduced likelihood of ECHS youth being excluded from school. B-38  Strengthened culture of safety, connectedness and inclusion schoolwide. i. Measures of Success  90% of participating students will show an improvement across a range of resiliency indicators, using a resiliency assessment tool that measures change in assets within the academic year, 2017 to 2018.  90% of participating students will report an increase in well-being through self-report on a qualitative evaluation tool within the academic year, 2017 to 2018.  ECHS School Climate Index (SCI) score will increase by 15 or more points from 2017 to 2018. B-39 Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay (JFCS East Bay) https://jfcs-eastbay.org/ Point of Contact: Amy Weiss, Director of Refugee and Immigrant Services Contact Information: 1855 Olympic Boulevard, #200, Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (925) 927-2000, aweiss@jfcs-eastbay.org 1. General Description of the Organization Rooted in Jewish values and historical experiences, and inspired by the diverse communities the agency serves, JFCS East Bay promotes the well-being of individuals and families by providing essential mental health and social services to people of all ages, races, and religions. Established in 1877, JFCS East Bay’s long tradition of caring directly impacts the lives of approximately 6,000 Alameda and Contra Costa residents each year. The agency provides services in three main program areas: Refugees & Immigrants, Children & Parents, and Adults & Seniors. Woven throughout these services is a comprehensive volunteer program. 2. Program: Community Bridges - PEI a. Scope of Services: During the term of this contract, Jewish Family & Community Services East Bay will assist Contra Costa Behavioral Health to implement the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), Prevention and Early Intervention Program “Reducing Risk of Developing Mental Illness” by providing Outreach and Engagement to Underserved Communities with the Community Bridges Program, providing culturally grounded, community-directed mental health education and navigation services to 200 to 300 refugees and immigrants of all ages and sexual orientations in the Afghan, Syrian, Iranian, Iraqi, African, and Russian comm unities of central Contra Costa County. Prevention and early intervention-oriented program components include culturally and linguistically accessible mental health education; early assessment and intervention for individuals and families; and health and mental health system navigation assistance. Services will be provided in the context of group settings and community cultural events, as well as with individuals and families, using a variety of convenient non-office settings such as schools, senior centers, and client homes. In addition, the program will include mental health training for frontline staff from JFCS East Bay and other community agencies working with diverse cultural populations, especially those who are refugees and immigrants. b. Target Population: Immigrant and refugee families of Contra Costa County at risk for developing a serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $174,485 d. Number served: FY 17-18: 330 clients e. Outcomes:  Provided assessment and short-term intervention to 141 bilingual clients.  Provided individual health and mental health navigation services to 141 clients.  Provided 4 trainings on cross-cultural mental health concepts for 35 to 40 frontline staff from JFCS East Bay and other community agencies.  Provided 2 (2-hour) mental health education classes to 20-24 Arabic-speaking clients.  Provided 4 (2-hour) mental health education classes to 10-12 Dari/Farsi-speaking seniors.  Provided 4 (2-hour) Dari/Farsi-bilingual parenting classes to 10-12 Afghan and Iranian parents. B-40  Provided 4 (2-hour) mental health education classes to 10-12 Russian-speaking seniors.  Referred 27 high-risk individuals to bilingual therapy services with JFCS East Bay’s bilingual therapist. B-41 Juvenile Justice System – Supporting Youth (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Daniel Batiuchok, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 202 Glacier Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 (925) 957-2739, Daniel.Batiuchok@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The staff working to support youth in the juvenile justice system operate within Contra Costa Behavioral Health’s Children’s System of Care. 2. Program: Mental Health Probation Liaisons and Orin Allen Youth Ranch Clinicians - PEI County behavioral health clinicians strive to help youth experiencing the juvenile justi ce system become emotionally mature and law abiding members of their communities. Services include: screening and assessment, consultation, therapy, and case management for inmates of the Juvenile Detention Facility and juveniles on probation, who are at risk of developing or struggle with mental illness or severe emotional disturbance. a. Scope of Services: Orin Allen Youth Rehabilitation Facility (OAYRF): OAYRF provides 100 beds for seriously delinquent boys ages 13-21, who have been committed by the Juvenile Court. OAYRF provides year-round schooling, drug education and treatment, Aggression Replacement Training, and extracurricular activities (gardening, softball). Additionally, the following mental health services are provided at OAYRF: psychological screening and assessment, crisis assessment and intervention, risk assessment, individual therapy and consultation, family therapy, psychiatric, case management and transition planning. Mental Health Probation Liaison Services (MHPLS): MHPLS has a team of three mental health probation liaisons stationed at each of the three field probation offices (in East, Central, and West Contra Costa County). The mental health probation liaisons are responsible for assisting youth and families as they transition ou t of detention settings and return to their communities. Services include: providing mental health and social service referrals, short term case management, short term individual therapy, short term family therapy. Additionally, the mental health probation liaisons are responsible for conducting court-ordered mental health assessments for youth within the county detention system. b. Target Population: Youth in the juvenile justice system in need of mental health support c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $695,855 d. Staff: 5 Mental Health Clinical Specialists: 3 probation liaisons, 2 clinicians at the Ranch e. Number served: FY 17-18: 300+ f. Outcomes:  Help youth address mental health and substance abuse issues that may underlie problems with delinquency B-42  Increased access to mental health services and other community resources for at risk youth  Decrease of symptoms of mental health disturbance  Increase of help seeking behavior; decrease stigma associated with mental illness. B-43 La Clínica de la Raza https://www.laclinica.org/ Point of Contact: Whitney Greswold, Planner Contact Information: P.O. Box 22210, Oakland, CA 94623 (510) 535 2911, wgreswold@laclinica.org 1. General Description of the Organization With 35 sites spread across Alameda, Contra Costa and Solano Counties, La Clínica delivers culturally and linguistically appropriate health care services to address the needs of the diverse populations it serves. La Clínica is one of the largest community health centers in California. 2. Program: Vías de Salud and Familias Fuertes - PEI a. Scope of Services: La Clínica de La Raza, Inc. (La Clínica) will implement Vías de Salud (Pathways to Health) to target Latinos residing in Central and East Contra Costa County with: a) 3,000 depression screenings; b) 500 assessment and early intervention services provided by a Behavioral Health Specialist to identify risk of mental illness or emotional distress, or other risk factors such as social isolation; and c) 1,000 follow-up support/brief treatment services to adults covering a variety of topics such as depression, anxiety, isolation, stress, communication and cultural adjustment. La Clínica’s PEI program category is Improving Timely Access to Services for Underserved Populations. Contractor will also implement Familias Fuertes (Strong Families), to educate and support Latino parents and caregivers living in Central and East Contra Costa County so that they can support the strong development of their children and youth. The project activities will include: 1) Screening for risk factors in youth ages 0 -18 (750 screenings); 2) 150 Assessments (includes child functioning and parent education/support) with the a Behavioral Health Specialist will be provided to parents/caretakers of children ages 0-18; 3) Two hundred (200) follow up visits with children/families to provide psycho-education/brief treatment regarding behavioral health issues including parent education, psycho-social stressors/risk factors and behavioral health issues. The goal is to be designed and implemented to help create access and linkage to mental health treatment, be designed, implemented and promoted in ways that improve timely access to mental health treatment services for persons and/or families from underserved populations, and be designed, implemented and promoted using strategies that are non -stigmatizing and non- discriminatory. b. Target Population: Contra Costa County Latino residents at risk for developing a serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $280,558 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 7669 consumers e. Outcomes: i. Vías de Salud  Participants of support groups reported reduction in isolation and depression  Offered 7,153 depression screenings, 633 assessments and early intervention services, 1,554 follow-up services ii. Familias Fuertes B-44  100% of parents reported increased knowledge about positive family communication  100% of parents reported improved skills, behavior, and family relationships  Offered 1,618 screenings for youth, 151 assessments for youth, 287 follow- up visits with families B-45 LAO Family Community Development https://lfcd.org/ Point of Contact: Kathy Chao Rothberg, Chief Executive Officer or Brad Meyer Contact Information: 1865 Rumrill Boulevard, Suite #B, San Pablo, CA 94806 (510) 215-1220, krothberg@lfcd.org or bmeyer@lfcd.org 1. General Description of the Organization Founded in 1980, Lao Family Community Development, Inc. (LFCD) annually assists more than 15,000 diverse refugee, immigrant, limited English, and low-income U.S. born community members in achieving long-term financial and social self-sufficiency. LFCD operates in 3 Northern California counties delivering timely, linguistically, and culturally appropriate services using an integrated service model that addresses the needs of the entire family unit, with the goal of achieving self -sufficiency in one generation. 2. Program: Health and Well-Being for Asian Families - PEI a. Scope of Services: Lao Family Community Development, Inc. provides a comprehensive and culturally sensitive Prevention and Early Intervention Program that combines an integrated service system approach for serving underserved Asian and South East Asian adults throughout Contra Costa County. The program activities designed and implemented include: comprehensive case management; evidence based educational workshops using the Strengthening Families Curriculum; and peer support groups. Strategies used reflect non-discriminatory and non-stigmatizing values. We will provide outreach, education and support to a diverse underserved population to facilitate increased development of problem solving skills, increase protective factors to ensure families emotional well-being, stability, and resilience. We will provide timely access, referral and linkage to increase client’s access to mental health treatment and health care providers in the community based, public and private system. LFCD provides in language outreach, education, and support to develop problem solving skills, and increase families’ emotional well-being and stability, and help reduce the stigmas and discriminations associated with experiencing mental health. The staff provides a client centered, family focused, strength based case management and planning process, to include home visits, brief counseling, parenting classes, advocacy and referral to other in - house services such as employment services, financial education, and housing services. These services are provided in clients’ homes, other community based settings and the offices of LFCD in San Pablo. b. Target Population: South Asian and South East Asian Families at risk for developing serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $190,416 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 127 e. Outcomes:  100% of program participants completed the Lubben Social Networking Scale (LSNS) assessments. Results indicate program participation leads to a decrease in social isolation.  Held 5 Strengthening Families Program (SFP) Educational Workshops  Held 4 Thematic Peer Support Group Events – in various locations including outdoor parks and spaces  92% of program participants were satisfied with services B-46 The Latina Center https://thelatinacenter.org/ Point of Contact: Miriam Wong Contact Information: 3701 Barrett Avenue #12, Richmond, CA 94805 (510) 233-8595, mwong@thelatinacenter.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Latina Center is an organization of and for Latinas that strives to develop emerging leaders in the San Francisco Bay Area through innovative training, support groups and leadership programs. The mission of The Latina Center is to improve the quality of life and health of the Latino Community by providing leadership and personal development opportunities for Latina women. 2. Program: Our Children First/Primero Nuestros Niños - PEI a. Scope of Services: The Latina Center (TLC) provides culturally and linguistically specific parenting education and support to at least 300 Latino parents and caregivers in West Contra Costa County that: 1) supports healthy emotional, social and educational development of children and youth ages 0-15, and 2) reduces verbal, physical and emotional abuse. The Latina Center enrolls primarily low- income, immigrant, monolingual/bilingual Latino parents and grandparent caregivers of high-risk families in a 12-week parenting class using the Systematic Training for Effective Parenting (STEP) curriculum or PECES in Spanish (Padres Eficaces con Entrenamiento Eficaz). Parent Advocates are trained to conduct parenting education classes, and Parent Partners are trained to offer mentoring, support and systems navigation. TLC provides family activity nights, creative learning circles, cultural celebrations, and community forums on parenting topics. b. Target Population: Latino Families and their children in West County at risk for developing serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $111,545 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 240 parents, 91 youth e. Outcomes:  Workshops reached an additional 67 participants  Latina Center offered a free summer camp which served 91 children  A total of 240 parents participated in evidenced based parenting curriculum B-47 Lifelong Medical Care https://www.lifelongmedical.org/ Point of Contact: Kathryn Stambaugh Contact Information: 2344 6th Street, Berkeley, CA 94710 (510) 981-4156, kstambaugh@lifelongmedical.org 1. General Description of the Organization Founded in 1976, LifeLong Medical Care (LifeLong) is a multi-site safety-net provider of comprehensive medical, dental, behavioral health and social services to low-income individuals and families in West Contra Costa and Northern Alameda counties. In 2017, LifeLong provided approximately 300,000 health care visits to 61,000 people of all ages. 2. Program: Senior Network and Activity Program (SNAP) - PEI a. Scope of Services: LifeLong’s PEI program, SNAP, brings therapeutic drama, art, music and wellness programs to isolated and underserved older adults in Richmond. SNAP encourages lifelong learning and creativity, reduces feelings of depression and social isolation, and connects consumers with mental health and social services as needed. All services are designed with consumer input to promote feelings of wellness and self-efficacy, reduce the effects of stigma and discrimination, build community connections, and provide timely access to underserved populations who are reluctant or unable to access other mental health and social services . SNAP provides services on-site at three low-income housing locations in West County, including weekly group activities, one-on-one check-ins, and case management. Activities vary based on consumer interests, but may include choir, theater, art, board games, word games, special events, and holiday celebrations. Services also include quarterly outings, screening for depression and isolation, information and referral services, and outreach to invite participation in group activities and develop a rapport with residents. Services are designed to improve timely access to mental health treatment services for persons and/or families from underserved populations, utilizing strategies that are non-stigmatizing and non-discriminatory. The expected impact of these services includes: reducing isolation and promoting feelings of wellness and self -efficacy; increasing trust and reducing reluctance to revealing unmet needs or accepting support services; decreasing stigma and discrimination among underserved populations; and improving quality of life by reducing loneliness and promoting friendships and connections with others. b. Target Population: Seniors in low income housing projects at risk for developing serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $130,786 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 154 e. Outcomes:  More than 50% of participants demonstrated self-efficacy and purpose by successfully completing at least one long-term project.  93% of respondents self-reported improvement in mood as a result of participating in SNAP.  98% of respondents reported satisfaction with the SNAP program. B-48 Lincoln Child Center http://lincolnfamilies.org/ Point of Contact: Allison Staulcup Becwar, LCSW President & CEO Contact Information: 1266 14th St, Oakland CA 94607 (510) 867-0944 allisonbecwar@lincolnfamilies.org 1. General Description of the Organization Lincoln was founded in 1883 as the region's first volunteer-run, non-sectarian, and fully integrated orphanage. As times and community needs evolved, Lincoln's commitment to vulnerable children remained strong. In 1951, Lincoln began serving abused, neglected and emotionally challenged children. Today, as a highly respected provider of youth and family services, Lincoln has a continuum of programs to serve challenged children and families throughout the Bay Area. Their community based services include early intervention programs in the Oakland and Pittsburg School Districts as well as family based services aimed at stopping the cycle of violence, abuse and mental health problems for at-risk children and families. 2. Program: Multi-Dimensional Family Therapy (MDFT) – Full Service Partnership CSS Multidimensional Family Therapy (MDFT), an evidence-based practice, is a comprehensive and multi-systemic family-based outpatient program for adolescents with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders who may be at high risk for continued substance abuse and other challenging behaviors, such as emotional dysregulation, defiance and delinquency. Working with the youth and their families, MDFT helps youth develop more effective coping and problem solving skills for better decision making, and helps the family improve interpersonal functioning as a protective factor against substance abuse and related problems. Services are delivered over 4 to 6 months, with weekly or twice-weekly, face-to-face contact, either in the home, the community or in the clinic with a 4 to 6 weeks after care component. a. Scope of Services:  Services include but are not limited to:  Outreach and engagement  Case management  Outpatient Mental Health Services  Crisis Intervention  Collateral Services  Group Rehab  Flexible funds  Contractor must be available to consumer on 24/7 basis b. Target Population: Children in West, Central and East County experiencing co- occurring serious mental health and substance abuse disorders. Youth and their families can be served by this program. c. Payment Limit: FY 18/19 $874,417 d. Number Served: The program served 61 clients in FY17/18. e. Outcomes: For FY 17/18:  Reduction in incidence of juvenile justice involvement  Reduction of the incidence of restriction  Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis B-49 Table 1. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 61 Lincoln Child Center, participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 17-18 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 9 6 0.017 0.015 -11.8% Inpatient episodes 5 3 0.012 0.006 -50% Inpatient days 27 11 0.066 0.025 -62.1% JACS 17 21 0.042 0.050 +19.0% B-50 PH Senior Care, LLC (Pleasant Hill Manor) Point of Contact: Evelyn Mendez-Choy Contact Information: 40 Boyd Road, Pleasant Hill CA, 94523 (925) 937-5348, emendez@northstarsl.com 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with Pleasant Hill Manor, a licensed board and care operator, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Cares – MHSA Housing Services - CSS a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to:  Medication management  Nutritional meal planning  Assistance with laundry  Transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments  Improving socialization  Assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.)  Encouraging meaningful activity  Other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 60 years and older, who live in Western, Central, and Eastern Contra Costa County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 95,481 d. Number served: For FY 17/18: 26 beds available. B-51 Mental Health Services Act Housing Services (Contra Costa Health, Housing, and Homeless – H3) https://cchealth.org/h3/ Point of Contact: Jenny Robbins, LCSW , Housing and Services Administrator Contact Information: 2400 Bisso Lane, Suite D2, Concord, CA 94520 (925) 608-6000, Jenny.Robbins@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division partners with the Health, Housing and Homeless Division to provide permanent and temporary housing with supports for person experiencing a serious mental illness and who are homeless or at risk of being homeless. 2. Program: Homeless Programs - Temporary Shelter Beds - CSS The County’s Health Housing and Homeless Services Division operate a number of temporary bed facilities in West and Central County for transitional age youth and adults. CCBHS, maintains a Memorandum of Understanding with the Health Housing and Homeless Services Division that provides additional funding to enable up to 64 individuals with a serious mental illness per year to receive temporary emergency housing for up to four months. a. Target Population: Individuals who are severely and persistently mentally ill or seriously emotionally disturbed, and are homeless. b. Total MHSA Portion of Budget: $2,048,912 c. Number Served in FY 17/18: 75 beds fully utilized for 365 days in the year. 3. Program: Permanent Housing - CSS Having participated in a specially legislated MHSA Housing Program through the California Housing Finance Agency the County, in collaboration with many community partners, the County completed a number of one-time capitalization projects to create 50 permanent housing units for individuals with serious mental illness. These individuals receive their mental health support from Contra Costa Behavioral Health contract and county service providers. The sites include Villa Vasconcellos in Walnut Creek, Lillie Mae Jones Plaza in North Richmond, The Virginia Street Apartments in Richmond, Robin Lane apartments in Concord, Ohlone Garden apartments in El Cerrito, Third Avenue Apartments in Walnut Creek, Garden Park apartments in Concord, and scattered units throughout the County operated by Anka Behavioral Health. a. Target Population: Individuals who are severely and persistently mentally ill or seriously emotionally disturbed and are homeless or at risk of homelessness. b. Total MHSA Portion of Budget: One Time Funding Allocated. c. Number Served in FY 17/18: 50 units. 4. Program: Coordination Team - CSS The CCBHS Health Housing and Homeless Services Coordinator and staff work closely with County’s Homeless Services Division staff to coordinate referrals and placements, facilitate linkages with other Contra Costa mental health programs and services, and provide contract monitoring and quality control of 26 augmented board and care providers to provide permanent supportive housing for chronically homeless disabled individuals. a. Target Population: Individuals who are severely and persistently mentally ill or seriously emotionally disturbed and are homeless or at risk of homelessness. B-52 b. Total FTE: 4.0 FTE c. Total MHSA Portion of Budget: $603,230 d. Number Served in FY 17/18: Approximately 700 individuals per year receive permanent or temporary supportive housing by means of MHSA funded housing services. B-53 Mental Health Systems, Inc. https://www.mhsinc.org/listing/contra-costa-action-team/ Point of Contact: Alicia Austin-Townsend, MA Contact Information: 2280 Diamond Blvd., #500, Concord, CA 94520 (925) 483-2223, atownsend@mhsinc.org 1. General Description of the Organization Mental Health Systems (MHS) provides mental health services and substance abuse treatment designed to improve the lives of individuals, families and communities. MHS operates over 80 programs throughout central and southern California and has recently contracted with Contra Costa Behavioral Health to provide Assisted Outpatient Treatment/Assertive Community Treatment services to residents of Contra Costa County. 2. Program: MHS Contra Costa ACTion Team - CSS Mental Health Systems, Inc. (MHS) will provide Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) services and subsequent Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) Full Service Partnership (FSP) services for up to 75 eligible adults in Contra Costa County. Program services shall meet the requirements of AB 1421 (Laura’s Law) while respecting the choice, autonomy and dignity of individuals struggling with the symptoms of serious mental illness (SMI) and/or co-occurring substance abuse disorders. The Contra Costa ACTion program will be inclusive of outreach, engagement and support in the investigatory process of AOT determination and the subsequent provision of ACT services. MHS’ FSP program model will incorporate an ACT Team whose multidisciplinary members will provide intensive community-based services to adults with SMI and co-occurring substance abuse disorders, who a) establish an AOT court settlement agreement, b) are court-ordered to receive these services, or c) meet the criteria and agree to voluntarily accept services. a. Scope of Services: The AOT/ACT Adult Full Service Partnership is a collaborative program that joins the resources of Mental Health Systems, Inc. and Contra Costa County Behavioral Health Services in a program under the auspices of the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA). ACT is an evidence-based treatment model approved by Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). The primary goal of ACT is recovery through community treatment and rehabilitation. b. Target Population: Adults diagnosed with serious mental illness and co-occurring substance abuse disorders, who a) establish an AOT court settlement agreement, b) are court-ordered to receive these services, or c) meet the criteria for FSP services and agree to voluntarily accept services. c. Payment Limit: FY 18/19 $2,015,710 d. Number Served: The program served 47 clients during the16/17 fiscal year and 68 clients during the 17/18 fiscal year. e. Outcomes: For FY 17/18  ACT treatment adherence was 66% overall.  Consumers receiving ACT services had a decrease in crisis episodes from 91% to 52%.  Consumers had a decrease in psychiatric hospitalizations from 55% to 31%.  Consumers had a decrease in jail bookings from 67% to 31%.  62% of consumers obtained or maintained housing while in ACT.  21% of consumers were employed between July and August 2018. B-54 Table 1. Pre-and post-enrollment utilization rates for 39 Mental Health Systems FSP participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 17-18 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change Enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 241 69 0.694 0.205 -70.5% Inpatient episodes 42 13 0.107 0.036 -66.4% Inpatient days 536 330 1.235 0.795 -35.6% * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre - enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: o (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/ (No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate o (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/ (No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate B-55 Modesto Residential Living Center, LLC. Point of Contact: Dennis Monterosso Contact Information: 1932 Evergreen Avenue, Modesto CA, 95350 (209)530-9300, info@modestoRLC.com 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with Modesto Residential, a licensed board and care operator, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Cares – MHSA Housing Services - CSS The County contracts with Modesto Residential Living Center, a licensed board and care provider, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to:  Medication management  Nutritional meal planning  Assistance with laundry  Transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments  Improving socialization  Assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.)  Encouraging meaningful activity  Other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 18 years to 59 years who lived in Contra Costa County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits, and accepted augmented board and care at Modesto Residential Living Center. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 73,310 d. Number served: For FY 17/18: Capacity of 6 beds. B-56 National Alliance on Mental Illness Contra Costa (NAMI CC) http://www.namicontracosta.org/ Point of Contact: Gigi Crowder Contact Information: 2151 Salvio Street, Suite V, Concord, CA 94520 (925) 942-0767, Gigi@namicontracosta.org 1. General Description of the Organization NAMI CC has been assisting people affected by mental illness for over 30 years now. Services provide support, outreach, education, and advocacy to those affected by mental illness. NAMI’s office is located in central Contra Costa County and the program has partnerships with other community and faith based organizations throughout the county that allow them to utilize their space and meet with people in their communities. 2. Program: Family Volunteer Support Network (FVSN) - WET NAMI CC will recruit, train and manage a network of volunteers with lived experience to support families and loved ones of people experiencing mental health issues. These volunteers will be an extended support network of resources, while assisting families in navigating the behavioral health system. This group of subject matter experts will help families gain a basic understanding of various mental health and substance abuse issues, learn to advocate for themselves or their loves one’s needs and become a network to other families experiencing similar situations. a. Scope of Services: Operate a main site in the Central region of the county and utilize satellite sites to extend outreach to other regions for the purpose of conducting volunteer training, support groups, and other educational activities that will build and maintain a cadre of volunteers.  Continuously recruit volunteers from all county regions, communities, economic levels, age groups, cultures, race/ethnicities and sexual preferences  Partner with organizations who specifically prepare individuals for volunteer service in community; such as CCBHS’s SPIRIT program.  Develop and maintain training curriculum as defined in Service Work Plan that prepares volunteers for their role in supporting family members and loved ones of persons experiencing mental health issues.  Establish partnerships with CCBHS and community and faith-based organizations; as well as ethnic and culturally specific agencies to coordinate family support efforts, assist CCBHS’s connectivity with families of consumers, stay abreast and adapt to current and future needs. Key CCBHS partnerships include the Family Partner (Children’s System of Care), Family Support Worker (Adult System of Care) Programs, and the Office for Consumer Empowerment. b. Target Population: Family members and care givers of individuals with lived mental health issues. c. Payment Limit: $600,000 d. Number served in FY 17-18: N/A – Program opened doors August 2018. e. Outcomes:  Staff, and pilot the FVSN Program.  Open one administrative office in central Contra Costa County, and maintain three satellite locations in east, west, and south Contra Costa County.  Partner with other CCBHS, community, and faith-based organizations to support families affected by mental health issues.  Develop training curriculum for FVSN Program. B-57  Start recruitment of volunteers. 3. Program: Family Psycho Education Program (Family to Family: Spanish, Mandarin, and Cantonese, FaithNet, and NAMI Basics) - WET a. Scope of Services: Family to Family is an evidence based NAMI educational training program offered throughout the county in Spanish, Mandarin and Cantonese languages to family members and caregivers of individuals experiencing mental health challenges. This training is designed to support and increase a family member’s/care giver’s knowledge of mental health, its impact on the family, navigation of systems, connections to community resources; and coping mechanisms. NAMI FaithNet is an interfaith resource network of NAMI mem bers, friends, clergy and congregations of all faith traditions who wish to encourage faith communities to be welcoming and supportive of persons and families living with mental illness. NAMI Basics is aimed to give an overview about mental health, how best to support a loved one at home, at school and when in getting medical care. The course is taught by a trained team of individuals and loved ones with lived experience.  Develop and implement a training program to help address the unique needs of the specified population, helping to serve Spanish, Mandarin and Cantonese speaking communities to help families develop coping skills to address challenges posed by mental health issues in the family, and develop skills to support the recovery of loved ones.  Instruction related to the mental health concepts, wellness and recovery principles, symptoms of mental health issues; as well as education on how mental illness and medications affect loved ones.  The training will be augmented by utilizing sites, such as faith centers and community based organizations throughout the county on an as needed basis in order to enable access to diverse communities with the goal of reaching the broadest audiences b. Target Population: Family members, care givers and loved ones of ind ividuals who have experienced or are experiences mental health issues. c. Payment Limit: $64,851 d. Number served: For FY 17/18: 890 e. Outcomes:  Deliver six Family-to-Family (12) week trainings during FY 17-18.  Hold four FaithNet events during FY 17-18.  Deliver four NAMI Basics (6) session trainings during FY 17-18.  All trainings will educate individuals on how to manage crises, solve problems, communicate effectively, learn the importance of self -care, and assist in developing confidence and stamina to provide support with compassion, and learn about the impact of mental illness on the family.  Feedback will inform decision making. Family member participation surveys will be created, administered and collected on a regular basis. Information collected will be analyzed to adjust methods to better meet the needs of all involved. Surveys will gauge participant knowledge, and level of confidence and understanding of mental health, advocacy and the public mental health system. B-58 Native American Health Center (NAHC) http://www.nativehealth.org/ Point of Contact: Chirag Patel, Catherine Nieva-Duran Contact Information: 2566 MacDonald Avenue, Richmond, 94804 (510) 434-5483, chiragp@nativehealth.org or catherinen@nativehealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Native American Health Center serves the California Bay Area Native Population and other under-served populations. NAHC has worked at local, state, and federal levels to deliver resources and services for the urban Native American community and other underserved populations, to offer medical, dental, behavioral health, nutrition, perinatal, substance abuse prevention, HIV/HCV care coordination and prevention services. 2. Program: Native American Wellness Center – PEI a. Scope of Services: Native American Health Center provides outreach for the increasing recognition of early signs of mental illness. To this end, they provide mental health prevention groups and quarterly events for Contra Costa County Community Members. These activities help develop partnerships that bring consumers and mental health professionals together to build a community that reflects the history and values of Native American people in Contra Costa County. Community-building activities done by NAHC staff, community members, and consultants, include: an elder’s support group, youth wellness group (including suicide prevention and violence prevention activities). Quarterly cultural events and traditional arts groups including: beading, quilting, shawl making and drumming. Other activities include: Positive Indian Parenting to teach life and parenting skills, Talking Circles that improve communication skills and address issues related to mental health, including domestic violence, individual and historical trauma and Gathering of Native Americans (GONA) to build a sense of belonging and cohesive community. Expected outcomes include increases in social connectedness, communication skills, parenting skills, and knowledge of the human service system in the county. Program Staff conduct cultural competency trainings for public officials and other agency personnel. Staff assist with System Navigation including individual peer meetings, referrals to appropriate services (with follow-up), and educational sessions about Contra Costa County’s service system. b. Target Population: Native American residents of Contra Costa County (mainly west region), who are at risk for developing a serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $241,831 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 162 e. Outcomes:  Program participants will increase social connectedness within a twelve month period.  Program participants will increase family communications.  Participants that engaged in referrals and leadership training will increase their ability to navigate the mental health/health/education systems. B-59 Oak Hills Residential Facility Point of Contact: Rebecca Lapasa Contact Information: 141 Green Meadow Circle, Pittsburg, CA 94565 (925) 709-8853, Rlapasa@yahoo.com 1. General Description of the Organization: The County contracts with Oak Hills, a licensed board and care operator, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Cares – MHSA Housing Services - CSS a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to:  Medication management  Nutritional meal planning  Assistance with laundry  Transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments  Improving socialization  Assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.)  Encouraging meaningful activity  Other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 18 years to 59 years who live in Western, Central, and Eastern Contra Costa County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $16,604 d. Number served: For FY 17/18: 6 beds. B-60 Office for Consumer Empowerment (OCE) (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) Point of Contact: Jennifer Tuipulotu, Program Manager Contact Information: 1330 Arnold Drive #140, Martinez, CA 94553 (925) 957-5206, Jennifer.Tuipulotu@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Office for Consumer Empowerment is a County operated program that supports the entire Behavioral Health System, and offers a range of trainings and supports by and for individuals who have experience receiving behavioral health services. The goals are to increase access to wellness and empowerment knowledge for participants of the Behavioral Health System. 2. Program: Reducing Stigma and Discrimination – PEI a. Scope of Services:  The PhotoVoice Empowerment Project equips individuals with lived mental health and co-occurring experiences with the resources of photography and narrative in confronting internal and external stigma and overcoming prejudice and discrimination in the community.  The Wellness and Recovery Education for Acceptance, Choice and Hope (WREACH) Speakers’ Bureau encourages individuals with lived mental health and co-occurring experiences, as well as family members and providers, to effectively present their recovery and resiliency stories in various formats to a wide range of audiences, such as health providers, academic faculty and students, law enforcement, and other community groups.  Staff leads and supports the Committee for Social Inclusion. This is an alliance of community members and organizations that meet regularly to promote social inclusion of persons who use behavioral health services. The committee promotes dialogue and guides projects and initiatives designed to reduce stigma and discrimination, and increase inclusion and acceptance in the community.  Staff provides outreach and support to peers and family members to enable them to actively participate in various committees and sub –committees throughout the system. These include the Mental Health Commission, the Consolidated Planning and Advisory Workgroup and sub-committees, and Behavioral Health Integration planning efforts. Staff provides mentoring and instruction to consumers who wish to learn how to participate in community planning processes or to give public comments to advisory bodies.  Staff partner with NAMI Contra Costa to offer a writers’ group for people diagnosed with mental illness and family members who want to get support and share experiences in a safe environment. 3. Program: Mental Health Career Pathway Program - WET a. Scope of Services:  The Mental Health Service Provider Individualized Recovery Intensive Training (SPIRIT) is a recovery-oriented peer led classroom and experientially based college accredited program that prepares individuals to become providers of service. Certification from this program is a requirement for many Community Support Worker positions in Contra Costa Behavioral Health. Staff provide instruction and administrative support, and provide ongoing support to graduates who are employed by the County. B-61 4. Program: Overcoming Transportation Barriers – INN a. Scope of Services:  The Overcoming Transportation Barriers program is a systemic approach to develop an effective consumer-driven transportation infrastructure that supports the entire mental health system of care. The goals of the program are to improve access to mental health services, improve public transit navigation, and improve independent living and self-management skills among peers. The program targets peers and caregivers throughout the mental health system of care. b. Target Population: Participants of public mental health services and their families; the general public. c. Total MHSA Funding for FY 2018-19: $894,671 d. Staff: 11 full-time equivalent staff positions. e. Outcomes:  Increased access to wellness and empowerment knowledge and skills by participants of mental health services.  Decrease stigma and discrimination associated with mental illness.  Increased acceptance and inclusion of mental health peers in all domains of the community. B-62 Older Adult Mental Health (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) https://cchealth.org/mentalhealth/#simpleContained4 Point of Contact: Heather Sweeten-Healy, LCSW, Mental Health Program Manager or Ellie Shirgul, PsyD, Mental Health Program Supervisor Contact Information: 2425 Bisso Lane, Suite 100, Concord, CA 94520 (925)-521-5620, Heather.Sweeten-Healy@cchealth.org, Ellen.Shirgul@cchealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Older Adult Mental Health Clinic is in the Adult System of Care and provides mental health services to Contra Costa’s senior citizens, including preventive care, linkage and outreach to under-served at risk communities, problem solving short-term therapy, and intensive care management for severely mentally ill individuals. 2. Program: Intensive Care Management Teams - CSS The Intensive Care Management Teams (ICMT) provides mental health services to older adults in their homes, in the community and within a clinical setting. Services are provided to Contra Costa County residents with serious psychiatric impairments who are 60 years of age or older. The program provides services to those who are insured through Medi-Cal, dually covered under Medi-Cal and MediCare, or uninsured. The primary goal of these teams is to support aging in place as well as to improve consumers’ mental health, physical health, prevent psychiatric hospitalization and placement in a higher level of care, and provide linkage to primary c are appointments, community resources and events, and public transportation in an effort to maintain independence in the community. Additionally, the teams provide services to those who are homeless, living in shelters, or in residential care facilities. T here are three multi- disciplinary Intensive Care Management Teams, one for each region of the county that increases access to resources throughout the county. 3. Program: Improving Mood Providing Access to Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) - CSS IMPACT is an evidence-based practice which provides depression treatment to individuals age 55 and over in a primary care setting. The IMPACT model prescribes short-term (8 to 12 visits) Problem Solving Therapy and medication consultation with up to one year of follow-up as necessary. Services are provided by a treatment team consisting of licensed clinicians, psychiatrists, and primary care physicians in a primary care setting. The target population for the IMPACT Program is adults age 55 years and older who are receiving health care services at a federally qualified health center. The program focuses on treating older adults with late-life depression and co-occurring physical health impairments, such as cardio-vascular disease, diabetes, or chronic pain. The primary goals of the Impact Program are to prevent more severe psychiatric symptoms, assist clients in accessing community resources as needed, reducing stigma related to accessing mental health treatment and providing access to therapy to this underserved population. 4. Program: Senior Peer Counseling - WET This program reaches out to isolated and mildly depressed older adults in their home environments and links them to appropriate community resources in a culturally competent manner. Services are provided by Senior Peer Volunteers, who are trained and supervised by the Senior Peer Counseling Coordinators. Both the Latino and Chinese Senior Peer Counseling Programs are recognized as a resource for these B-63 underserved populations. This program serves older adults age 55 and older who are experiencing aging issues such as grief and loss, multiple health problems, loneliness, depression and isolation. Primary goals of this program are to prevent more severe psychiatric symptoms and loss of independence, reduce stigma re lated to seeking mental health services, and increase access to counseling services to these underserved populations. a. Target Population: Depending on program, Older Adults aged 55 or 60 years and older experiencing serious mental illness or at risk for developing a serious mental illness. b. Total Budget: Intensive Care Management - $2,995,707; IMPACT - $392,362; Senior Peer Counseling - $370,479. c. Staff: 28 Full time equivalent multi-disciplinary staff. d. Number served: For FY 17/18: ICMT served 238 individ uals; IMPACT served 440 individuals; Senior Peer Counseling Program trained and supported 34 volunteers and served 267 individuals. e. Outcomes: For IMPACT and ICM: Changes in Level of Care Utilization System (LOCUS) scores, reductions in Psychiatric Emergency Service visits, reductions in hospitalizations, decreased Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ -9) scores, and reduced isolation, which is assessed by the PEARLS (ICM only). The SPC Program is in the process of implementing the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) that will be administered at intake, and at the end of counseling to assess levels of anxiety and depression. 5. Program: Partners in Aging - INN Partners in Aging is an Innovation Project that was implemented on September 1st, 2016. Partners in Aging adds up to two Community Support Workers, up to 3 Student Interns and 8 hours/week of Psychiatric Services to the IMPACT program. The project is designed to increase the ability of the IMPACT program to reach out to underserved older adult populations through outreach at the Miller Wellness Center and Psychiatric Emergency Services. Through Partners in Aging, IMPACT has provided more comprehensive services, including providing linkage to Behavioral Health, Ambulatory Care, and community resources. Peer support, rehab, and in-home and in-community coaching will allow the skills learned through psychotherapy to be practiced in the community. a. Scope of Services: Community Support Workers and Student Interns provide d linkage, in-home and in-community peer support, and health/mental health coaching to consumers open to or referred to the IMPACT program. In addition, the CSW and Student Intern provide outreach to staff at Psychiatric Emergency Services and Miller Wellness Center. They are available to meet with consumers at PES and MWC that meet the criteria for IMPACT to provide outreach, and linkage to services. The Student Intern conducts intakes, assessments, and provides individual psychotherapy. Additionally, a Geropsychiatrist will be available 8 hours/week to provide consultation, and in-person evaluations of IMPACT clients. b. Target Population: The target population receiving health care services at the Federally Qualified Health Center for the IMPACT Program is adults age 55 years and older. The program focuses on treating older adults with late-life depression or anxiety and co-occurring physical health impairments, such as cardio-vascular disease, diabetes, or chronic pain. Partners in Aging also focused on providing B-64 outreach and services to older adults who are experiencing both mental health symptoms and alcohol or drug misuse. c. Annual Payment Limit: $250,000 d. Number served: For FY 17/18: 38 individuals e. Outcomes: Reductions in Level of Care Utilization System (LOCUS) scores, reductions in Psychiatric Emergency Service visits, reductions in hospitalizations, and decreased Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores would indicate the effectiveness of this program. B-65 People Who Care (PWC) Children Association http://www.peoplewhocarechildrenassociation.org/ Point of Contact: Constance Russell, Executive Director Contact Information: 2231 Railroad Avenue, Pittsburg, CA 94565 (925) 427-5037, PWC.Cares@comcast.net 1. General Description of the Organization People Who Care Children Association has provided educational, vocational and employment training programs to children ages 12 through 21 years old, since 2001. Many are at risk of dropping out of school and involved with, or highly at risk of entering, the criminal juvenile justice system. The mission of the organization is to empower children to become productive citizens by promoting educational and vocational opportunities, and by providing training, support and other tools needed to overcome challenging circumstances. 2. Program: PWC Afterschool Program (PEI) a. Scope of Services: Through its After School Program, People Who Care (PWC) will provide Prevention services through providing work experience for 200 multicultural at-risk youth residing in the Pittsburg/Bay Point and surrounding East Contra Costa County communities, as well as programs aimed at increasing educational success among those who are either at-risk of dropping out of school, or committing a repeat offense. Key activities include job training and job readiness training, ment al health support and linkage to mental health counseling, as well as civic and community service activities. b. Target Population: At risk youth with special needs in East Contra Costa County. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $223,102 d. Number served: For FY 17-18: 212 e. Outcomes:  Participants in Youth Green Jobs Training Program increased their knowledge and skills related to entrepreneurship, alternative energy resources and technologies, and Green Economy.  Participants of the PWC After-School Program showed improved youth resiliency factors (i.e., self-esteem, relationship, and engagement).  More than 50% of participants did not re-offend during the participation in the program  Participants in PWC After School Program reported having a caring relationship with an adult in the community or at school.  Majority of participants showed an increase in school day attendance and decrease in school tardiness. B-66 Portia Bell Hume Behavioral Health and Training Center https://www.humecenter.org/ Point of Contact: Reynold Fujikawa, PsyD, Program Manager (Community Support Program East) Contact Information: 555 School Street, Pittsburg, CA 94565 (925) 384.7727, rfujikawa@humecenter.org Point of Contact: Miguel Hidalgo-Barnes, PsyD, Program Manager (Community Support Program West) Contact Information: 3095 Richmond Pkwy #201, Richmond, CA 94806 (925) 481-4412, mhidalgo-barnes@humecenter.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Hume Center is a Community Mental Health Center that provides high quality, culturally sensitive and comprehensive behavioral health care services and training. The agency strives to promote mental health, reduce disparities and psychological suffering, and strengthen communities and systems in collaboration with the people most involved in the lives of those served. They are committed to training behavioral health professionals to the highest standards of practice, while working within a culture of support and mutual respect. They provide a continuity of care in Contra Costa that includes prevention and early intervention, comprehensive assessment services, behavioral consultation services, outpatient psychotherapy and psychiatry, case management, Partial Hospitalization services, and Full Service Partnership Programs. 2. Program: Adult Full Service Partnership - CSS The Adult Full Service Partnership is a collaborative program that joins the resources of Hume Center and Contra Costa County Behavioral Health Services. a. Goal of the Program:  Prevent repeat hospitalizations  Transition from institutional settings  Attain and/or maintain medication compliance  Improve community tenure and quality of life  Attain and/or maintain housing stability  Attain self-sufficiency through vocational and educational support  Strengthen support networks, including family and community supports  Limit the personal impact of substance abuse on mental health recovery b. Referral, Admission Criteria, and Authorization: i. Referral: To inquire about yourself or someone else receiving our Full Service Partnership Services in our Community Support Program (CSP) East program, please call our Pittsburg office at (925) 432-4118. For services in our CSP West program, please contact our Richmond office at (510) 778-2816. ii. Admission Criteria: This program serves adult aged 26 and older who are diagnosed with severe mental illness and are:  Frequent users of emergency services and/or psychiatric emergency services  Homeless or at risk of homelessness  Involved in the justice system or at risk of this  Have Medi-Cal insurance or are uninsured iii. Authorization: Referrals are approved by Contra Costa Behavioral Health Division. B-67 c. Scope of Services: Services will be provided using an integrated team approach called Community Support Program (CSP). Our services include:  Community outreach, engagement, and education to encourage participation in the recovery process and our program  Case management and resource navigation for the purposes of gaining stability and increasing self-sufficiency  Outpatient Mental Health Services, including services for individuals with co- occurring mental health & alcohol and other drug problems  Crisis Intervention, which is an immediate response to support a consumer to manage an unplanned event and ensure safety for all involved, which can include involving additional community resources  Collateral services, which includes family psychotherapy and consultation. These services help significant persons to understand and accept the consumer’s condition and involve them in service planning and delivery.  Medication support, including medication assessment and ongoing management (may also be provided by County Physician)  Housing support, including assisting consumers to acquire and maintain appropriate housing and providing skill building to support successful housing. When appropriate, assist consumers to attain and maintain MHSA subsidized housing.  Flexible funds are used to support consumer’s treatment goals. The most common use of flexible funds is to support housing placements through direct payment of deposit, first/last month’s rent, or unexpected expenses in order to maintain housing.  Vocational and Educational Preparation, which includes supportive services and psychoeducation to prepare consumers to return to school or work settings. This aims to return a sense of hope and trust in themselves to be able to achieve the goal while building the necessary skills, support networks, and structures/habits.  Recreational and Social Activities aim to assist consumers to decrease isolation while increasing self-efficacy and community involvement. The goal is to assist consumers to see themselves as members of the larger community and not marginalized by society or themselves.  Money Management, which is provided by sub-contractors, aims to increase stability for consumers who have struggled to manage their income. Services aim to increase money management skills to reduce the need for this service.  24/7 Afterhours/Crisis Line is answered during non-office hours so that consumers in crisis can reach a staff member at any time. Direct services are provided on weekends and holidays as well. d. Target Population: Adults diagnosed with severe mental illness in East, Central and West County who are diagnosed with a serious mental illness, are at or below 300% of the federally defined poverty level, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. e. Payment Limit: For FY 17-18 (East and West CSP): $1,948,137 f. Number served: For FY 17/18: 48 individuals (East); and 68 individuals (West) g. Outcomes: For FY 17/18 (East):  Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis  Reduction of the incidence of restriction  For FY (West): 1. Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis 2. Reduction of the incidence of restriction B-68 Table 1. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 51 Hume East FSP participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 17-18 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 279 140 0.495 0.263 -36.1% Inpatient episodes 44 10 0.075 0.016 -60.2% Inpatient days 572 519 0.966 0.848 -12.2% Table 1. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 76 Hume West FSP participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 17-18 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 127 81 0.140 0.089 -36.4% Inpatient episodes 21 13 0.023 0.014 -39.1% Inpatient days 287 232 0.315 0.254 -19.4% * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre - enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: o (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/ (No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate o (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/ (No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate B-69 Primary Care Clinic Behavioral Health Support (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) https://cchealth.org/mentalhealth/#simpleContained4 Point of Contact: Kelley Taylor, Ambulatory Care Clinic Supervisor Contact Information: 3052 Willow Pass Road, Concord, CA 94519 (925) 681-4100, Kelley.Taylor@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization Behavioral health clinicians staff the county Primary Care Health Centers in Concord. The goal is to integrate primary and behavioral health care. Two mental health clinicians are part of a multi-disciplinary team with the intent to provide timely and inte grated response to those at risk, and/or to prevent the onset of serious mental health functioning among adults visiting the clinic for medical reasons. 2. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS a. Scope of Services: Perform brief mental health assessment and intervention with adults, children, and their families. Provide short term case management, mental health services, individual and family support, crisis intervention, triage, coordination of care between primary care and Behavioral Health Services. Tasks also include linkage to schools, probation, social services and community services and lead groups at County Primary Care Center. b. Target Population: Adults in central county, who present at the clinic for medical reasons c. Number served by clinic: For FY 17/18: 200+. d. Outcomes: Improve overall health for individuals through decrease medical visit and increase coping with life situations. B-70 Putman Clubhouse https://www.putnamclubhouse.org/ Point of Contact: Tamara Hunter, Executive Director Contact Information: 3024 Willow Pass Road #230, Concord CA 94519 (925) 691-4276 or (510) 926-0474, tamara@putnamclubhouse.org 1. General Description of the Organization Putnam Clubhouse provides a safe, welcoming place, where participants (called members), recovering from mental illness, build on personal strengths instead of focusing on illness. Members work as colleagues with peers and a small staff to maintain recovery and prevent relapse through work and work-mediated relationships. Members learn vocational and social skills while doing everything involved in running The Clubhouse. 2. Program: Preventing Relapse of Individuals in Recovery - PEI a. Scope of Services: i. Project Area A: Putnam Clubhouse’s peer-based programming helps adults recovering from psychiatric disorders access support networks, social opportunities, wellness tools, employment, housing, and health services. The work-ordered day program helps members gain prevocational, social, and healthy living skills as well as access vocational options within Contra Costa. The Clubhouse teaches skills needed for navigating/accessing the system of care, helps members set goals (including educational, vocational, and wellness), provides opportunities to become involved in stigma reduction and advocacy. Ongoing community outreach is provided throughout the County via presentations and by distributing materials, including a brochure in both English and Spanish. The Young Adult Initiative provides weekly activities and programming planned by younger adult members to attract and retain younger adult members in the under-30 age group. Putnam Clubhouse helps increase family wellness and reduces stress related to caregiving by providing respite through Clubhouse programming and by helping Clubhouse members improve their independence. ii. Project Area B: Putnam Clubhouse assists the Office for Consumer Empowerment (OCE) by providing career support through hosting Career Corner, an online career resource for mental health consumers in Contra Costa County, and holding countywide career workshops. iii. Project Area C: Putnam Clubhouses assists Contra Costa County Behavioral Health in a number of other projects, including organizing community events and by assisting with administering consumer perception surveys. iv. Project Area D: Putnam Clubhouse assists Contra Costa County Behavioral Health in implementing the Portland Identification and Early Referral (PIER) program for individuals at risk of psychosis, First Hope, by providing logistical and operational support. b. Target Population: Contra Costa County residents with identified mental illness and their families. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $598,468 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 308 e. Outcomes (FY17-18):  70 new members enrolled and participated in at least one activity B-71  Held 4 career workshops  Prepared 9,000 meals for members  Provided 54,437 hours of Clubhouse programming to members  Clubhouse membership made a positive impact by decreasing hospitalizations B-72 Rainbow Community Center https://www.rainbowcc.org/ Point of Contact: Kevin McAllister, Executive Director Contact Information: 2118 Willow Pass Road, Concord, CA 94520 (925) 692-0090, kevin.mcallister@rainbowcc.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Rainbow Community Center of Contra Costa County builds community and promotes well-being among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Questioning (LGBTQ) people and our allies. Services are provided in our main office in Concord, our satellite location in West County, and in East County by arrangements with partner organizations. 2. Programs: A.) Outpatient Behavioral Health and Training B.) Community-based Prevention and Early Intervention - PEI a. Scope of Services: i. Outpatient Services: Rainbow works with LGBTQ mental health consumers to develop a healthy and un-conflicted self-concept by providing individual, group, couples, and family counseling, as well as case management and linkage/brokerage services. Services are available in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. ii. Pride and Joy: Three-tiered prevention and early intervention model. Tier One: outreach to hidden groups, isolation reduction and awareness building. Tier Two: Support groups and services for clients with identified mild to moderate mental health needs. Tier Three: Identification and linkage of clients with high levels of need and who require system navigation support. Services are aimed at underserved segments of the LGBTQ community (seniors, people living with HIV, and community members with unrecognized health and mental health disorders). iii. Youth Development: Three tiered services (see above) aimed at LGBTQ youth as a particularly vulnerable population. Programming focuses on building resiliency against rejection and bullying, promoting healthy LBGTQ identity, and identifying and referring youth in need of higher levels of care. Services are provided on-site and at local schools. iv. Inclusive Schools: Community outreach and training involving school leaders, staff, parents, CBO partners, faith leaders and students to build acceptance of LGBTQ youth in Contra Costa County schools, families, and faith communities. b. Target Population: LGBTQ community of Contra Costa County who are at risk of developing serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $759,362 for PEI, including counseling and case management services onsite and at Contra Costa schools. d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 1460 e. Outcomes:  Rainbow held 28 trainings during the year  Rainbow’s Inclusive School Coalition served the following four districts: Mt. Diablo, Pittsburg, Acalanes, West Contra Costa Unified.  Youth Support Programming served: 144 youth via outreach; 176 youth in groups; 43 through one on one work; 387 through school-based outreach; 118 through mental health services, and 65 through psycho-social groups. B-73  Pride & Joy program reached 1,054 members of the community through events/groups; 387 through brief intervention; and 204 through individual services. B-74 RI International Inc. (formerly known as Recovery Innovations) https://riinternational.com/our-services/california/contra-costa/ Point of Contact: April Langro, Recovery Services Administrator Contact Information: 3701 Lone Tree Way, Antioch, CA 94509 2975 Treat Boulevard C-8, Concord, CA 94518 2101 Vale Road #300, San Pablo, CA 94806 (925) 494-4008, April.Langro@RIIinternational.com 1. General Description of the Organization RI International was founded as META Services, an Arizona non-profit corporation. It has developed and provided a range of traditional mental health and substance abuse services for adults with long term mental health and addiction challenges. RI International pioneered an innovative initiative: the creation of the new discipline of Peer Support Specialist. This experience has transformed the RI International workforce to one in which Peer Support Specialists and professionals work together on integrated teams to deliver recovery-based services. The RI International experience has had a global impact on the mental health field serving as a demonstration that recovery from mental illness and/or addiction is possible. Based on transformation experience, RI International operates recovery-based mental health services in over 20 communities in five states and one location in New Zealand. RI International has provided recovery training and transformation consultation in 27 states and five countries abroad. 2. Program: RI International Wellness Cities – CSS RI International provides Adult Wellness Cities that serve individuals or citizens experiencing mental and/or behavioral health challenges in west, central and east Contra Costa County. W ellness Cities provide a variety of wellness and recovery- related classes and groups, one-on-one coaching, vocational opportunities, links to community resources, and recreational opportunities in a peer supported environment. The classes, groups and coaching are recovery-oriented and facilitated by peer recovery coaches. Coaches work with citizens to establish individualized goals, a wellness recovery action plan (WRAP), self-help and coping skills, support networks and a commitment to overall wellness. All services provided are related to at least one of the nine dimensions of wellness; physical, emotional, intellectual, social, spiritual, occupational, home and community living, financial and recreation/leisure. Participants seeking services become citizens of the city. Citizens develop a 6 month partnership with RI International and are assigned a Peer Recovery Coach who has experienced their own success in recovery by obtaining education, coping skills, self -management and/or sobriety. They share what they have learned and walk alongside each citizen on their individualized and strength-based path to recovery. Other services provided are case management support by the Recovery Care Coordinator. The position assists individuals with linkages that provide independence, education and support in the community. The Employment Services Coordinator also helps RI citizens that are ready in their path to recovery with support of positive employment opportunities; whether it be paid or volunteer work. a. Scope of Services:  Peer and family support  Personal recovery planning using the seven steps of Recovery Coaching  Monthly one on one coaching and meaningful outcome tracking B-75  Workshops, education classes, evidence-based IMR groups, community based activities using the 9 Dimensions of Wellness (physical, emotional, intellectual, social, spiritual, occupational, home/community living, financial, recreation/leisure)  Community outreach and collaboration  Assist participants to coordinate medical, mental health, medication and other community services through Care Coordination  Supportive employment program through the use of an Employment Specialist position as well as the Employment Prep & Placement (E3P) Program  Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP) classes  Snacks and lunch meals during weekdays for participants  Further enhance services by providing transportation to community based activities using the 9 Dimensions of Wellness (physical, emotional, intellectual, social, spiritual, occupational, home/community living, financial, recreation/leisure)  Community Outreach and Collaboration with Mental Health Partners and Providers – NAMI, HUME, WET team, Project Homeless Connect, WREACH, SPIRIT, CORE, etc.  Links to Resources - Assist participants to coordinate medical, mental health, medication, housing, and other community services  SPIRIT Program – obtain attendance records from the OCE and process reimbursement (stipend) for SPIRIT students. b. Target Population: Adult mental health participants in Contra Costa County. RI International services will be delivered within each region of the county through Wellness Cities located in Antioch, Concord and San Pablo. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $973,583.33 d. Number served: FY 17/18: 363 (340 were active, regular participants) e. Outcomes: For FY 17-18, RI International served a total of 363 citizens, of which 71.2% or 258 developed a Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP). 93.9% or 340 also met with a Recovery Coach at least once a month while receiving services. Attendance numbers for the four core classes during FY 17-18 are as follows:  63 attended WRAP classes  57 attended WELL classes  48 attended Facing up to Health classes  65 attended the 9 Dimensions of Wellness classes  RI International was also able to offer Illness Management Recovery (IMR) classes to RI Citizens; funded through Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). B-76 RYSE Center https://rysecenter.org/ Point of Contact: Kanwarpal Dhaliwal, Co-found and Associate Director Contact Information: 205 41st Street, Richmond. CA 94805 (925) 374-3401, Kanwarpal@rysecenter.org 1. General Description of the Organization RYSE is a youth center in Richmond that offers a wide range of activities, programs, and classes for young people including media arts, health education, career and educational support, and youth leadership and advocacy. RYSE operates within a community behavioral health model and employs trauma informed and healing centered approaches in all areas of engagement, including one-on-one, group and larger community efforts. In these areas, RYSE focuses on the conditions, impact, and strategies to name and address community distress, stigma, and mental health inequities linked to historical trauma and racism, as well as complex, chronic trauma. This focus enables RYSE to provide culturally relevant, empathetic, and timely community mental health and wellness services, resources, and supports across all our program areas and levels of engagement. 1. Program: Supporting Youth – PEI a. Scope of Services: i. Trauma Response and Resilience System (TRRS): Develop and implement Trauma and Healing Learning Series for key system partners, facilitate development of a coordinated community response to violence and trauma, evaluate impact of trauma informed practice, provide critical response and crisis relief for young people experiencing acute incidents of violence (individual, group, and community-wide). ii. Health and Wellness: Support young people (ages 13 to 21) from the diverse communities of West County to become better informed (health services) consumers and active agents of their own health and wellness, support young people in expressing and addressing the impact of stigma, discrimination, and community distress; and foster healthy peer and youth -adult relationships. Activities include mental health counseling and referrals, outreach to schools, workshops and ‘edutainment’ activities that promote inclusion, healing, and justice, youth assessment and implementation of partnership plans (Chat it Up Plans). iii. Inclusive Schools: Facilitate collaborative work with West Contra Costa schools and organizations working with and in schools aimed at making WCCUSD an environment free of stigma, discrimination, and isolation for LGBTQ students. Activities include assistance in provision of LGBT specific services, conducting organizational assessments, training for adults and students, engaging students in leadership activities, and providing support groups at target schools, etc. b. Target Population: West County Youth at risk for developing serious mental illness. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $488,368 d. Unique Number served: In FY 17-18: 680 young people e. Outcomes:  254 RYSE members participated in at least two programs within the integrative model B-77  7 youth-generated videos were created to address health, social inequity and stigma reduction.  RYSE served 34 youth through the Hospital-Linked Violence Intervention Program (R2P2)  RYSE reached at least 1105 adults through community-wise and sector specific trauma-informed care trainings, presentations and gatherings.  RYSE reached at least 500 young people through their Queer Trans Summit  75 young people received services through RYSE’s school-linked services B-78 Seneca Family of Agencies http://www.senecafoa.org/ Point of Contact: Jennifer Blanza, Program Director Contact Information: 3200 Clayton Road, Concord, CA, 94519 (415) 238-9945; jennifer_blanza@senecacenter.org 1. General Description of the Organization Seneca Family of Agencies is a leading innovator in the field of community-based and family-based service options for emotionally troubled children and their families. With a continuum of care ranging from intensive crisis intervention, to in-home wraparound services, to public school-based services, Seneca is one of the premier children’s mental health agencies in Northern California. 2. Program: Short Term Assessment of Resources and Treatment (START) - Full Service Partnership - CSS Seneca Family of Agencies (SFA) provides an integrated, coordinated service to youth who frequently utilize crisis services, and may be involved in the child welfare and/or juvenile justice system. START provides three to six months of short term intensive services to stabilize the youth in their community, and to connect them and their families with sustainable resources and supports. The goals of the program are to 1) reduce the need to utilize crisis services, and the necessity for out-of-home and emergency care for youth enrolled in the program, 2) maintain and stabilize the youth in the community by assessing the needs of the family system, identifying appropriate community resources and supports, and ensuring their connection with sustainable resources and supports, and 3) successfully link youth and family with formal services and informal supports in their neighborhood, school and community. a. Scope of Services:  Outreach and engagement  Linkage  Assessment  Case management  Plan development  Crisis Intervention  Collateral  Flexible funds  Contractor must be available to consumer on 24/7 basis b. Target Population: The target population for the program includes youth with a history of multiple psychiatric hospitalizations and crisis interventions, imminent risk of homelessness, who have a serious mental illness and/or are seriously emotionally disturbed, and are not being served, or are being underserved, by the current mental health system. Youth in the program can be Medi-Cal eligible or uninsured. c. Payment Limit: FY 18/19 $ 1,000,203 d. Number served: Number served in FY 17/18: 61 individuals e. Outcomes:  Establish linkage with ongoing resources/support.  Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis  Reduction of the incidence of restriction B-79 Table 1. Pre-and post-enrollment utilization rates for 60 Seneca Start FSP Participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 17-18 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 86 39 0.167 0.092 -44.9% Inpatient episodes 24 22 0.047 0.05 -6.38% Inpatient days 145 135 0.278 0.301 -8.27% * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre - enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: o (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/ (No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate o (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/ (No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate B-80 SHELTER, Inc. https://shelterinc.org/ Point of Contact: John Eckstrom, Chief Executive Officer Contact Information: P.O. Box 5368, Concord, CA 94524 (925) 957-7595, john@shelterinc.org 1. General Description of the Organization The mission of SHELTER, Inc. is to prevent and end homelessness for low-income, homeless, and disadvantaged families and individuals by providing housing, services, support, and resources that lead to self -sufficiency. SHELTER, Inc. was founded in 1986 to alleviate Contra Costa County's homeless crisis, and its work encompasses three main elements: 1) prevent the onset of homelessness, including rental assistance, case management, and housing counseling services, 2) ending the cycle of homelessness by providing housing plus services including employment, education, counseling and household budgeting to help regain self -sufficiency and 3) providing permanent affordable housing for over 200 low-income households, including such special needs groups as transition-age youth, people with HIV/AIDS, and those with mental health disabilities. 2. Program: Supportive Housing - CSS SHELTER, Inc. provides a master leasing program, in which adults or children and their families are provided tenancy in apartments and houses throughout the County. Through a combination of self-owned units and agreements with landlords SHELTER, Inc. acts as the lessee to the owners and provides staff to support individuals and their families move in and maintain their homes independently. Housing and rental subsidy services are provided to residents of the County who are homeless and that have been certified by Contra Costa Behavioral Health as eligible. This project is committed to providing housing opportunities that provide low barriers to obtaining housing that is affordable, safe and promotes independence to MHSA consumers. a. Scope of Services.  Provide services in accordance with the State of California Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Housing Program, the Contra Costa County Behavioral Health Mental Health Division’s Work Plan, all State, Federal and Local Fair Housing Laws and Regulations, and the State of California’s Landlord and Tenants Laws.  Provide consultation and technical support to Contra Costa Behavioral Health with regard to services provided under the housing services and rental subsidy program.  Utilize existing housing units already on the market to provide immediate housing to consumers through master leasing and tenant based services.  Acquire and maintain not less than 100 master-leased housing units throughout Contra Costa County.  Negotiate lease terms and ensure timely payment of rent to landlords.  Leverage housing resources through working relationships with owners of affordable housing within the community.  Integrate innovative practices to attract and retain landlords and advocate on behalf of consumers.  Leverage other rental subsidy programs including, but not limited to, Shelter Plus Care and HUD Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8).  Reserve or set aside units of owned property dedicated for MHSA consumers. B-81  Ensure condition of leased units meet habitability standards by having Housing Quality Standard (HQS) trained staff conduct unit inspections prior to a unit being leased and annually as needed.  Establish maximum rent level to be subsidized with MHSA funding to be Fair Market Rent (FMR) as published by US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for Contra Costa County in the year that the unit is initially rented or meeting rent reasonableness utilizing the guidelines established by HUD and for each year thereafter.  Provide quality property management services to consumers living in master leased and owned properties.  Maintain property management systems to track leases, occupancy, and maintenance records.  Maintain an accounting system to track rent and security deposit charges and payments.  Conduct annual income re-certifications to ensure consumer rent does not exceed 30% of income minus utility allowance. The utility allowance used shall be in accordance with the utility allowances established by the prevailing Housing Authority for the jurisdiction that the housing unit is located in.  Provide and/or coordinate with outside contractors and SHELTER, Inc. maintenance staff for routine maintenance and repair services and provide after -hours emergency maintenance services to consumers.  Ensure that landlords adhere to habitability standards and complete major maintenance and repairs.  Process and oversee evictions for non-payment of rent, criminal activities, harmful acts upon others, and severe and repeated lease violations.  Work collaboratively with full service partnerships and/or County Mental Health Staff around housing issues and provide referrals to alternative housing options.  Attend collaborative meetings, mediations and crisis interventions to support consumer housing retention.  Provide tenant education to consumers to support housing retention. b. Target Population: Consumers eligible for MHSA services. The priority is given to those who are homeless or imminently homeless and otherwise eligible for the full service partnership programs. c. Annual Payment Limit: $2,349, 929 d. Number served: For FY 17/18 Shelter, Inc. served 118 consumers. e. Outcomes: SHELTER, Inc. reports on the following outcomes:  Quality of life: housing stability. i. Goal: 70% of MHSA Consumers residing in master leased housing shall remain stably housed for 18 months or longer. In FY16 -17, the vast majority of consumers in master-leased units remained housed for the entire year, and many had been stably housed for 3 plus years. One new consumer moved in during FY16/17, and remained housed at the end of the fiscal year. For those who moved out during the fiscal year, 90% of the consumers who exited the program had been stably housed for 18 months or longer. ii. Goal: 70% of MHSA Consumers residing in SHELTER, Inc. owned property shall remain stably housed for 12 months or longer. In FY16-17, the majority of consumers in agency-owned units remained housed for the entire year, and many had been stably housed for 2-5 years. Six new consumers moved in B-82 during FY16/17, and five remained housed at the end of the fiscal year. For those who moved out during the fiscal year, 90% of the consumers who exited the program had been stably housed for 12 months or longer. B-83 STAND! For Families Free of Violence http://www.standffov.org/ Point of Contact: Reina Sandoval Beverly Contact Information: 1410 Danzig Plaza #220, Concord, CA 94520 (925) 676-2845, reinasb@standffov.org 1. General Description of the Organization STAND! For Families Free of Violence is a provider of comprehensive domestic violence and child abuse services in Contra Costa County, offering prevention, intervention, and treatment programs. STAND! builds safe and strong families through early detection, enhanced support services, community prevention and education, and empowerment to help individuals rebuild their lives. STAND! enlists the efforts of local residents, organizations and institutions, all of whom are partners in ending family violence. STAND! is a founding member of the "Zero Tolerance for Domestic Violence Initiative", a cross-sector organization working for fifteen years to help end domestic violence, sexual assault and childhood exposure to violence. 2. Program: “Expect Respect” and “You Never Win With Violence” - PEI a. Scope of Services: STAND! provides services to address the effects of teen dating violence/domestic violence and helps maintain healthy relationships for at-risk youth throughout Contra Costa County. STAND! uses two evidence-based, best-practice programs: “Expect Respect” and “You Never Win with Violence” to directly impact youth behavior by preventing future violence and enhancing positive mental health outcomes for students already experiencing teen dating violence. Primary prevention activities include educating middle and high school youth about teen dating through the ‘You Never Win with Violence’ curriculum, and providing school personnel, service providers and parents with knowledge and awareness of the scope and causes of dating violence. The program strives to increase knowledge and awareness around the tenets of a healthy adolescent dating relationship. Secondary prevention activities include supporting youth experiencing, or at-risk for teen dating violence by conducting 20 gender-based, 15-week support groups. Each school site has a system for referring youth to the support groups. As a result of these service activities, youth experiencing or at-risk for teen dating violence will demonstrate an increased knowledge of : 1) the difference between healthy and unhealthy teen dating relationships, 2) an increased sense of belonging to positive peer groups, 3) an enhanced understanding that violence does not have to be “normal”, and 4) an increased knowledge of their rights and responsibilities in a dating relationship. b. Target Population: Middle and high school students at risk of dating violence. c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $134,113 d. Number served: For FY 17-18: 2179 participants e. Outcomes:  77 You Never Win with Violence presentations reached 1987 participants  18 Expect Respect groups reached 192 participants  Youth Against Violence: 10 youth leaders trained in summer 2017  Adult Allies: 31 adults trained in two presentations B-84 Telecare Corporation https://www.telecarecorp.com/ Point of Contact: Clearnise Bullard, Program Administrator and Jim Christopher, Clinical Director Contact Information: 300 Ilene Street, Martinez, CA 94553 (925) 313-7980, cbullard@telecarecorp.com, jchristopher@telecarecorp.com 1. General Description of the Organization Telecare Corporation was established in 1965 in the belief that persons with mental illness are best able to achieve recovery through individualized services provided in the least restrictive setting possible. Today, they operate over 100 programs staffed by more than 2,500 employees in California, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Nebraska, North Carolina, Texas, New Mexico and Pennsylvania and provide a broad continuum of services and supports, including Inpatient Acute Care, Inpatient Non -Acute/Sub- Acute Care, Crisis Services, Residential Services, Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) services, Case Management and Prevention services. 2. Program: Hope House Crisis Residential Facility - CSS Telecare Corporation operates Hope House, a voluntary, highly structured 16-bed Short-Term Crisis Residential Facility (CRF) for adults between the ages of 18 and 59. Hope House is serves individuals who require crisis support to avoid hospitalization, or are discharging from the hospital or long-term locked facilities and need step-down care to transition back to community living. The focus is client-centered and recovery- focused, and underscores the concept of personal responsibility for the resident's illness and independence. The program supports a social rehabilitation model, which is designed to enhance an individual's social connection with family and community so that they can move back into the community and prevent a hospitalization. Services are recovery based, and tailored to the unique strengths of each individual resident. The program offers an environment where residents have the power to make decisions and are supported as they look at their own life experiences, set their own paths toward recovery, and work towards the fulfillment of their hopes and dreams. Telecare’s program is designed to enhance client motivation to actively participate in treatment, provide clients with intensive assistance in accessing community resources, and assist clients develop strategies to maintain independent living in the community and improve their overall quality of life. The program’s service design draws on evidence -based practices such as Wellness Action and Recovery Planning (WRAP), motivational interviewing, and integrated treatment for co-occurring disorders. a. Scope of Services:  Individualized assessments, including, but not limited to, psychosocial skills, reported medical needs/health status, social supports, and current functional limitations within 24 hours of admission.  Psychiatric assessment within 24 hours of admission.  Treatment plan development with 72 hours of admission.  Therapeutic individual and group counseling sessions on a daily basis to assist clients in developing skills that enable them to progress towards self -sufficiency and to reside in less intensive levels of care.  Crisis intervention and management services designed to enable the client to cope with the crisis at hand, maintaining functioning status in the community, and prevent further decompensation or hospitalization. B-85  Medication support services, including provision of medications, as clinically appropriate, to all clients regardless of funding; individual and group education for consumers on the role of medication in their recovery plans, medication choices, risks, benefits, alternatives, side effects and how these can be managed; supervised self-administration of medication based on physician’s order by licensed staff; medication follow-up visit by a psychiatrist at a frequency necessary to manage the acute symptoms to allow the client to safely stay at the Crisis Residential Program, and to prepare the client to transition to outpatient level of care upon discharge.  Co-occurring capable interventions, using the Telecare Co-Occurring Education Group materials for substance use following a harm reduction modality as well as availability of weekly AA and NA meetings in the community.  Weekly life skills groups offered to develop and enhance skills needed to manage supported independent and independent living in the community.  A comprehensive weekly calendar of activities, including physical, recreational, social, artistic, therapeutic, spiritual, dual recovery, skills development and outings.  Peer support services/groups offered weekly.  Engagement of family in treatment, as appropriate.  Assessments for involuntary hospitalization, when necessary.  Discharge planning and assisting clients with successful linkage to community resources, such as outpatient mental health clinics, substance abuse treatment programs, housing, full service partnerships, physical health care, and benefits programs.  Follow-up with client and their mental health service provider following discharge to ensure that appropriate linkage has been successful.  Daily provision of meals and snacks for residents.  Transportation to services and activities provided in the community, as well as medical and court appointments, if the resident’s case manager or county worker is unavailable, as needed. b. Target Population: Adults ages 18 to 59 who require crisis support to avoid psychiatric hospitalization, or are discharging from the hospital or long-term locked facilities and need step-down care to transition back to community living. c. Payment Limit: $2,077,530.00 d. Number served: Hope House had 255 client admissions in FY17/18 and an unduplicated client count of 232. e. Outcomes:  Reduction in severity of psychiatric symptoms: Discharge at least 90% of clients to a lower level of care.  Consumer Satisfaction: Maintain an overall client satisfaction score of at least 4.0 out of 5.0. B-86 United Family Care, LLC (Family Courtyard) Point of Contact: Juliana Taburaza Contact Information: 2840 Salesian Avenue, Richmond CA 94804 (510) 235-8284, JuTaburaza@gmail.com 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with United Family Care, LLC (Family Courtyard), a licensed board and care provider, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Care Housing Services - CSS a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to:  Medication management  Nutritional meal planning  Assistance with laundry  Transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments  Improving socialization  Assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.)  Encouraging meaningful activity  Other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 60 years and older who live in Western, Central, and Eastern Contra Costa County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $467,455 d. Number served: For FY 17/18: 50 beds available. B-87 Vicente Martinez High School - Martinez Unified School District http://vmhs-martinez-ca.schoolloop.com/ Point of Contact: Lori O’Connor Contact Information: 925 Susana Street, Martinez, CA 94553 (925) 335-5880, loconnor@martinez.k12.ca.us 1. General Description of the Organization The program serves Vicente Martinez High School 9-12th grade, at-risk students with a variety of experiential and leadership opportunitie s that support social, emotional and behavioral health, career exposure and academic growth while also encouraging, linking and increasing student access to direct mental health services. These services are also provided to students of Briones School, an independent study program located on the same campus. The program has been jointly facilitated within a unique partnership between Martinez Unified School District (MUSD) and the New Leaf Collaborative (501c3). 2. Program: Vicente Martinez High School & Briones School- PEI a. Scope of Services: Vicente Martinez High School and Briones School provide their students of all cultural backgrounds an integrated, mental health focused, learning experience. Key services include student activities that support:  individualized learning plans  mindfulness and stress management interventions  team and community building  character, leadership, and asset development  place-based learning, service projects that promote hands-on learning and intergenerational relationships  career-focused exploration, preparation and internships  direct mental health counseling  timely access and linkage to direct mental health counseling Services support achievement of a high school diploma, transferable career skills, college readiness, post-secondary training and enrollment, democratic participation, social and emotional literacy and mental/behavioral health. All students also have access to a licensed Mental Health Counselor for individual and group counseling. Students enrolled in Vicente and Briones have access to the variety of programs/services that meet their individual learning goals. Classes have a maximum of 23 students, and are led by teachers and staff who have training in working with at-risk students and using restorative justice techniques. Students regularly monitor their own progress through a comprehensive advisory program designed to assist them in becoming more self -confident through various academic, leadership, communication, career and holistic health activities. b. Target Population: At-risk high school students in Central County c. Payment Limit: FY 18-19: $185,763 d. Number served: In FY 17-18: 140 Transition Aged Youth (TAY) e. Outcomes: i. Goals: Students enrolled in Vicente and Briones will: B-88  Develop an increased ability to overcome social, familial, emotional, psychiatric, and academic challenges and hence work toward academic, vocational, relational, and other life goals  Increase mental health resiliency  Participate in four or more different PEI related activities throughout the school year  Decrease incidents of negative behavior  Increase attendance rates ii. Goals: During the 17-18 School Year:  95% of Vicente students enrolled during the 17-18 school year participated in PEI related activities.  PEI services were extended to Briones independent study students; 37% participated in services.  All seniors participated in a minimum of 15 hours of service learning.  Staff organized and hosted 70 different types of activities and events to enrich the curricula.  All students were offered mental health counseling.  Developmental Assets Profile (DAP) assessment was administered to all students. B-89 West County Adult Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) https://cchealth.org/mentalhealth/#simpleContained4 Point of Contact: Robin O’Neill, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 2523 El Portal Drive, San Pablo, CA 94806 (510) 215-3700, Robin.ONeill@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The East Adult Mental Health Clinic operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Adult System of Care, and provides assessments, case management, psychiatric services, crisis intervention, housing services, and benefits assistance. Within the Adult Mental Health Clinic are the following MHSA funded programs and plan elements: 2. Plan Element: Adult Full Service Partnership Support - CSS Contra Costa Mental Health has dedicated clinicians at each of the three adult mental health clinics to provide support, coordination and rapid access for full service partners to health and mental health clinic services as needed and appropriate. Rapid Access Clinicians offer drop-in screening and intake appointments to clients who have been discharged from the County Hospital or Psychiatric Emergency Services but who are not open to the county mental health system of care. Rapid Access Clinicians will then refer clients to appropriate services and, when possible, follow-up with clients to ensure a linkage to services was made. If a client meets eligibility criteria for Full Service Partnership services, the Rapid Access Clinician will seek approval to refer the client to Full Service Partnership services. Clinic management acts as the gatekeepers for the Full Service Partnership programs, authorizing referrals and discharges as well as providing clinical oversight to the regional Full Service Partnership programs. Full Service Partnership Liaisons provide support to the Full Service Partnership programs by assisting the programs with referrals and discharges, offering clinical expertise, and helping the programs to navigate the County systems of care. 3. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS General Systems Development strategies are programs or strategies that improve the larger mental health system of care. These programs and strategies expand and enhance the existing service structure to 1) assist consumers in obtaining benefits they entitled to, educate consumers on how to maximize use of those benefits and manage resources, and 2) provide transportation support for consumers and families. a. Clinic Target Population: Adults aged 18 years and older who live in West County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. b. Total Number served by clinic: For FY 17-18: Approximately 2,435 Individuals. B-90 West County Children’s Mental Health Clinic (Contra Costa Behavioral Health) https://cchealth.org/mentalhealth/#simpleContained4 Point of Contact: Chad Pierce, Mental Health Program Manager Contact Information: 303 41st Street, Richmond, CA 94805 (510) 374-7208, Chad.Pierce@CCHealth.org 1. General Description of the Organization The Behavioral Health Services Division of Contra Costa Health Services combines Mental Health, Alcohol & Other Drugs and Homeless Program into a single system of care. The West Children’s Mental Health Clinic operates within Contra Costa Mental Health’s Children’s System of Care, and provides psychiatric and outpatient services, family partners, and wraparound services. Within the Children ’s Mental Health Clinic are the following MHSA funded plan elements: 2. Plan Element: Clinic Support - CSS General Systems Development strategies are programs or strategies that improve the larger mental health system of care. These programs and strategies expand and enhance the existing service structure to assist consumers in the following areas: Family Partners and Wraparound Facilitation. The family partners assist families with advocacy, transportation assistance, navigation of the service system, and of fer support in the home, community, and county service sites. Family partners support families with children of all ages who are receiving services in the children. Family partners are located in each of the regional clinics for children and adult services, and often participate on wraparound teams following the evidence -based model. A Clinical Specialist in each regional clinic who provides technical assistance and oversight of evidence-based practices in the clinic. Support for full service partners. a. Target Population: Children aged 17 years and younger, who live in West County, are diagnosed with a serious emotional disturbance or serious mental illness, and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits b. Number served by clinic: For FY 1718: Approximately 473 Individuals. B-91 Williams Board and Care Point of Contact: Frederick Williams, Katrina Williams Contact Information: 430 Fordham Drive, Vallejo CA (707) 731-2326, Fred_Williams@b-f.com 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with Williams Board and Care, a licensed board and care operator, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Care - Housing Services - CSS a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to:  Medication management  Nutritional meal planning  Assistance with laundry  Transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments  Improving socialization  Assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.)  Encouraging meaningful activity  Other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 18 years to 59 years who live in Western, Central, and Eastern Contra Costa County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $32,846 d. Number served: For FY 17/18: 6 beds available. B-92 Woodhaven Point of Contact: Milagros Quezon Contact Information: 3319 Woodhaven Lane, Concord, CA 94519 (925) 349-4225, Rcasuperprint635@comcast.net 1. General Description of the Organization The County contracts with Woodhaven, a licensed board and care operator, to provide additional staff care to enable those with serious mental illness to avoid institutionalization and enable them to live in the community. 2. Program: Augmented Board and Care - Housing Services - CSS a. Scope of Services: Augmented residential services, including but not limited to:  Medication management  Nutritional meal planning  Assistance with laundry  Transportation to psychiatric and medical appointments  Improving socialization  Assist with activities of daily living (i.e., grooming, hygiene, etc.)  Encouraging meaningful activity  Other services as needed for individual residents b. Target Population: Adults aged 18 years to 59 years who live in Western, Central, and Eastern Contra Costa County, are diagnosed with a serious mental illness and are uninsured or receive Medi-Cal benefits. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 12,731 d. Number served: For FY 17/18: 4 beds available. B-93 Youth Homes, Inc. https://www.youthhomes.org/ Point of Contact: Candy Espino, Chief Executive Officer or Kim Chilvers, Chief Program Officer Contact Information: 3480 Buskirk Ave #210, Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 (925) 933–2627, Candye@youthhomes.org: Kimc@youthhomes.org 1. General Description of the Organization Youth Homes, Inc. is committed to serving the needs of abused and neglected children and adolescents in California's San Francisco Bay Area. Youth Homes provides intensive residential treatment programs and community-based counseling services that promote the healing process for seriously emotionally abused and traumatized children and adolescents. 2. Program: Transition Age Youth Full Service Partnership - CSS Youth Homes implements a full service partnership program using a combination of aspects of the Integrated Treatment for Co-Occurring Disorders model (also known as Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment – IDDT) and aspects of the Assertive Community Treatment model. These models are recognized evidence based practice in which the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has created a tool kit to support implementation. Integrated Treatment for Co-Occurring Disorders is an evidence-based practice for treating clients diagnosed with both mental health and a substance abuse disorders. Through Integrated Treatment for Co-Occurring Disorders, consumers receive mental health and substance abuse treatment from a single “integrated treatment specialist” so consumers do not get lost in the health care system, excluded from treatment, or confused by going back and forth between separate mental health and substance abuse programs. It is not expected that all full service partners will be experiencing a substance use issue; however, for those who have co-occurring issues, both disorders can be addressed by one single provider. a. Scope of Services:  Outreach and engagement  Case management  Outpatient Mental Health Services, including services for individuals with co- occurring mental health & alcohol and other drug problems  Crisis Intervention  Collateral  Medication support (may be provided by County Physician)  Housing support  Flexible funds  Money Management  Vocational Services  Contractor must be available to consumer on 24/7 basis b. Target Population: Young adults ages 16 to 25 years with serious emotional disturbance/serious mental illness, and who are likely to exhibit co-occurring disorders with severe life stressors and are from an underserved population. Services are based in East Contra Costa County as well as Central Contra Costa County. c. Annual MHSA Payment Limit: $ 705,499 d. Number served: For FY 17/18: 39 individuals B-94 e. Outcomes: For FY 17/18:  Reduction in incidence of psychiatric crisis  Reduction of the incidence of restriction Table 1. Pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates for 40 Youth Homes FSP Participants enrolled in the FSP program during FY 17-18 No. pre- No. post- Rate pre- Rate post- %change enrollment enrollment enrollment enrollment PES episodes 137 95 0.388 0.252 -35.0% Inpatient episodes 56 17 0.171 0.045 -73.6% Inpatient days 437 252 1.402 0.606 -56.8% * Data on service utilization were collected from the county’s internal billing system, PSP. To assess the effect of FSP enrollment on PES presentations and inpatient episodes, this methodology compares clients’ monthly rates of service utilization pre - enrollment to clients’ post-enrollment service utilization rates. Using PES usage as an example, the calculations used to assess pre- and post-enrollment utilization rates can be expressed as: o (No. of PES episodes during pre- enrollment period)/ (No. of months in pre- enrollment period) =Pre-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate o (No. of PES episodes during post-enrollment period)/ (No. of months in post- enrollment period) =Post-enrollment monthly PES utilization rate. B-95 (This page left intentionally blank) C-1 Appendix C Glossary AB 1421 or Laura’s Law - Assembly Bill 1421. Enacted in 2002, to create an assisted outpatient treatment program for any person who is suffering from a mental disorder and meets certain criteria. The program operates in counties that choose to provide the services. Adoption of this law enables a court, upon a verified petition to the court, to order a person to obtain and participate in assisted outpatient treatment. The bill provides that if the person who is the subject of the petition fails to comply with outpatient treatment, despite efforts to solicit compliance, a licensed mental health treatment provider may request that the person be placed under a 72-hour hold, based on an involuntary commitment. The law would be operative in those counties in which the county board of supervisors, by resolution, authorized its application and made a finding that no voluntary mental health program serving adults, and no children’s mental health program, would be reduced as a result of the implementation of the law. ACT - Assertive Community Treatment. An intensive and highly integrated approach for community mental health service delivery. It is an outpatient treatment for individuals whose symptoms of mental illness result in serious functioning difficulties in several major areas of life, often including work, social relationships, residential independence, money management, and physical health and wellness. Its mission to promote the participants' independence, rehabilitation, and recovery, and in so doing to prevent homelessness, unnecessary hospitalization, and other negative outcomes. It emphasizes out of the office interventions, a low participant to staff ratio, a coordinated team approach, and typically involves a psychiatrist, mental health clinician, nurse, peer provider, and other rehabilitation professionals. ADA - Americans with Disabilities Act. Prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in several areas, including employment, transportation, public accommodations, communications and access to state and local government’ programs and services. AOD – Alcohol and Other Drugs. Is an office like Mental Health that is part of the division of Behavioral Health Services. Behavioral Health Services is under the Health Services Department. AOT - Assisted Outpatient Treatment. A civil court ordered mental health treatment for persons demonstrating resistance to participating in services. Treatment is modeled after assertive community treatment, which is the delivery of mobile, community-based care by multidisciplinary teams of highly trained mental health professionals with staff-to-client ratios of not more than one to ten, and additional services, as specified, for adults with the most persistent and severe mental illness. AOT involves a service and delivery process that has a clearly designated personal services coordinator who is responsible for providing or assuring needed services. These include complete assessment of the client’s needs, development with the client of a personal services plan, outreach and consultation with the family and other significant persons, linkage with all appropriate community services, monitoring of the quality and follow through of C-2 services, and necessary advocacy to ensure each client receives those services which are agreed to in the personal services plan. AOT is cited under AB 1421 or Laura’s Law. APA - American Psychological Association. The mission of the APA is to promote the advancement, communication, and application of psychological science and knowledge to benefit society and improve lives. BHS - Behavioral Health Services. Is a grouping of Contra Costa Mental Health and Alcohol and Other Drug Services which make up the division of BHS. BHS is under the Health Services Department. Board and Care - Augmented Board and Care. A facility licensed by the State also contract with Contra Costa Mental Health to receive additional funding to provide a therapeutic environment and assist residents gain their independence through recovery and wellness activities. Extra staff time is devoted to create a home-like atmosphere, often with shared housekeeping activities, and provide or coordinate a variety of therapeutic, educational, social and vocational activities. Persons who experience severe and persistent mental illness are eligible. BOS - Board of Supervisors. Appointed body that is responsible for; 1) appointing most County department heads, except elected officials, and providing for the appointment of all other County employees, 2) providing for the compensation of all County officials and employees, 3) creating officers, boards and commissions as needed, appointing members and fixing the terms of office, 4) awarding all contracts except those that are within the authority delegated to the County Purchasing Agent, 5) adopting an annual budget, 6) sponsoring an annual audit made of all County accounts, books, and records, 7) supervising the operations of departments and exercising executive and administrative authority through the County government and County Administrator 8) serving as the appellate body for Planning and Zoning issues, 9) serving as the County Board of Equalization (the Board has created an Assessment Appeals Board to perform this function Brown Act. Established in 1953; ensures the public's right to attend and participate in meetings of local legislative bodies. It declares that the California public commissions, boards and councils and the other public agencies in this state exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business. Actions should be taken openly and their deliberations be conducted openly. The people should remain informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created. The Brown Act has been interpreted to apply to email communication as well. CalMHSA - California Mental Health Services Authority. The mission of CalMHSA is to provide member counties a flexible, efficient, and effective administrative/fiscal structure focused on collaborative partnerships and pooling efforts in1) development and implementation of common strategies and programs, 2) fiscal integrity, protections, and management of collective risk, 3) accountability at state, regional, and local levels. CAO - County Administrator’s Officer. The County Administrator's Office is responsible for; 1) staffing the Board of Supervisors and Board committees, 2) C-3 overseeing implementation of Board directives, 3) planning, monitoring, and overseeing County operations, 4) ensuring that Board policies are carried out in the most efficient, cost-effective, and service oriented manner, 5) supervising appointed Department Heads and performing general administrative duties, 6) preparing the annual budget, 7) administering the County's labor management relations program, including managing the collective bargaining process, grievance investigations, providing training and counseling to managers and employees, as well as problem resolution Case Management. Refers to a service in which a mental health clinician develops and implements a treatment plan with a consumer. This treatment plan contains a diagnosis, level of severity, agreed upon goals, and actions by the consumer, the case manager, and other service providers to reach those goals. The mental health clinician provides therapy and additionally takes responsibility for the delivery and/or coordination of both mental and rehabilitation services that assist the consumer reach his/her goals. CASRA - California Association of Social Rehabilitation Agencies. A statewide non-profit organization that service clients of the California public mental health system. Member agencies provide a variety of services to enhance the quality of life and community participation of youth, adults and older adults living with challenging mental health issues. CBHDA – California Behavioral Health Director’s Association. A non-profit advocacy association representing the behavioral health directors from each of California’s 58 counties, as well as two cities (Berkeley and Tri-City). Through advocacy, lobbying and education efforts, CBHDA promotes the reduction of individual and community problems related to unaddressed behavioral health issues. CBHDA regularly brings together behavioral health professionals to discuss ways to inform public policy and improve the delivery of behavioral health services. CBO - Community Based Organization. An agency or organization based in the community that is often a non-profit. CCMH - Contra Costa Mental Health. One of 58 counties, the City of Berkeley, and the Tri-Cities area East of Los Angeles legislatively empowered to engage in a contract, or Mental Health Plan, with the state to perform public mental health services. This enables Contra Costa County to utilize federal, state, county and private funding for these mental health services. The Mental Health Services Act is one source of state funding. CCMH is divided into a Children’s System of Care and an Adult and Older Adult System of Care. CFO - Chief Financial Officer. Abbreviation used to describe term. CF/TN - Capital Facilities/Information Technology. The title of one of five components of the MHSA. This component enables a county to utilize MHSA funds for one-time construction projects and/or installation or upgrading of electronic systems, such as mental health records systems. C-4 CHHS – California Health and Human Services Agency. The agency which oversees twelve departments and five offices that provides a range of health care services, social services, mental health services, alcohol and drug services, income assistance, and public health services to Californians. More than 33,000 people work for departments in CHHS at state headquarters in Sacramento, regional offices throughout the state, state institutions and residential facilities serving the mentally ill and people with developmental disabilities. CIBHS - California Institute for Behavioral Health Solutions. A non-profit agency that helps health professionals, agencies and funders improve the lives of people with mental health and substance use challenges through policy, training, evaluation, technical assistance, and research. Clinical Specialist. In the context of this document, refers to a licensed or registered intern in the specialties of social work, marriage and family therapy, psychology, psychiatric nurse practitioner, licensed professional clinical counselor, or psychiatrist. A Clinical Specialist is capable of signing a mental health consumer’s treatment plan that can enable the County to bill Medi-Cal for part of the cost to deliver the service. Clubhouse Model. A comprehensive program of support and opportunities for people with severe and persistent mental illness. In contrast to traditional day-treatment and other day program models, Clubhouse participants are called "members" (as opposed to consumers, patients, or clients) and restorative activities focus on their strengths and abilities, not their illness. The Clubhouse is unique in that it is not a clinical program, meaning there are no therapists or psychiatrists on staff. All participation in a clubhouse is strictly on a voluntary basis. Members and staff work side-by-side as partners to manage all the operations of the Clubhouse, providing an opportunity for members to contribute in significant and meaningful ways. A Clubhouse is a place where people can belong as contributing adults, rather than passing their time as patients who need to be treated. The Clubhouse Model seeks to demonstrate that people with mental illness can successfully live productive lives and work in the community, regardless of the nature or severity of their mental illness. COLA - Cost of Living Adjustment. Abbreviation used to describe term. Community Forum. In this context a community forum is a planned group activity where consumers, family members, service providers, and representatives of community, cultural groups or other entities are invited to provide input on a topic or set of issues relevant to planning, implementing or evaluating public services. Conservatorship - A probate conservatorship is a court proceeding where a judge appoints a responsible person (called a conservator) to care for another adult who cannot care for him/herself or his/her finances. Consumer. In this context consumers refer to individuals and their families who receive behavioral health services from the County, contract partners, or private providers. Consumers are also referred to as clients, patients, participants or members. C-5 Co-Occurring Disorders or Dual Diagnosis. Refers to more than one behavioral and/or medical health disorder that an individual can experience and present for care and treatment. Common examples are an individual with a substance abuse disorder coupled with a mental health diagnosis, or a developmental disability, such as autism, coupled with a thought disorder. CPAW - Consolidated Planning Advisory Workgroup. An ongoing advisory body appointed by the Contra Costa Mental Health Director that provides advice and counsel in the planning and evaluation of services funded by MHSA. It is also comprised of several sub-committees that focus on specific areas, such as stigma reduction, homelessness, and services to the four age groups. It is comprised of individuals with consumer and family member experience, service providers from the County and community based organizations, and individuals representing allied public services, such as education and social services. CPPP - Community Program Planning Process. This a term used in regulations pertaining to the Mental Health Services Act. It means the process to be used by the County to develop Three-Year Expenditure Plans, and updates in partnership with stakeholders to 1) identify community issues related to mental illness resulting from lack of community services and supports, including any issues identified during the implementation of the Mental Health Services Act, 2) Analyze the mental health needs in the community, and 3) identify and re-evaluate priorities and strategies to meet those mental health needs. CSS - Community Services and Supports. The title of one of five components funded by the MHSA. It refers to mental health service delivery systems for children and youth, transition age youth, adults, and older adults. These services and supports are similar to those provided in the mental health system of care that is not funded by MHSA. Within community services and supports are the categories of full service partnerships, general system development, outreach and engagement, and project based housing programs. CSW – Community Support Worker. Peer Provider in Contra Costa County public mental health system. CTYA – Children’s, Teens, and Young Adults. Abbreviation used to describe term. Cultural Competence. In this context, refers to equal access to services of equal quality provided, without disparities among racial/ethnic, cultural, and linguistic populations or communities. DHCS - Department of Health Care Services. The mission of DHCS is to provide Californians with access to affordable, integrated, high-quality health care, including medical, dental, mental health, substance use treatment services and long term care. Our vision is to preserve and improve the overall health and well-being of all Californians. DSM IV - Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition. The C-6 handbook used by health care professionals to diagnosis mental disorders. DSM contains descriptions, symptoms, and other criteria for diagnosing mental disorders Dual Diagnosis. See Co-Occurring Disorders. Employment or Vocational Services. A continuum of services and supports designed to enable individuals to get and keep a job. It includes 1) pre-vocational services, such as removing barriers to employment, 2) employment preparation, to include career counseling and education, training and volunteer activity support, 3) job placement, to include job seeking, placement assistance and on-the-job training, and 4) job retention, to include supported employment. EPIC System. A nationwide computer software company that offers an integrated suite of health care software centered on a database. Their applications support functions related to patient care, including registration and scheduling; clinical systems for doctors, nurses, emergency personnel, and other care providers; systems for lab technicians, pharmacists, and radiologists; and billing systems for insurers. EPSDT - Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment. A federally mandated specialty mental health program that provides comprehensive and preventative services to low income children and adolescents that are also involved with Children and Family Services. Evidence Based Practices. This term refers to treatment practices that follow a prescribed method that has been shown to be effective by the best available evidence. This evidence is comprised of research findings derived from the systematic collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation of questions and testing of hypotheses. Family Partners. Also referred to as Parent Partners, this professional brings lived experience as a family member of an individual with a serious mental illness to their provision of services. They often participate as a member of a multi-disciplinary team providing mental health treatment, and assist families understand, acquire and navigate the various services and resources needed. In Contra Costa County, Family or Parent Partners have a job classification of Community Support Worker. Family-to-Family Training. An educational course for family, caregivers and friends of individuals living with mental illness. Taught by trained volunteer instructors from NAMI CC it is a free of cost twelve week course that provides critical information and strategies related to caregiving, and assists in better collaboration with mental health treatment providers. Federal Poverty Level. This is a total household income amount that the federal government provides an annual guideline that defines whether individuals are living above or below the poverty level. For example, a family of four is determined to live under the poverty level if their total income in 2014 is $23,850. 51/50 – Fifty One Fifty. Refers to the Welfare and Institutions Code of California for the temporary, involuntary psychiatric commitment of individuals who present a danger C-7 to themselves or others due to signs of mental illness. FY- Fiscal Year. A fiscal year is a specified 12-month period used for accounting and reporting purposes. In Contra Costa County, the fiscal year runs from July 1st of one year to June 30th of the next year. Focus Groups. In this context, refers to a small group (usually 8-15) of individuals to provide input, advice and counsel on practices, policies or proposed rulemaking on matters that affect them. Often these individuals are grouped by similar demographics or characteristics in order to provide clarity on a particular perspective. Forensics. In this context, refers to the term used for individuals involved in the legal court system with mental health issues. 4C. Term used to refer to Psychiatric Ward of Contra Costa County Regional Medical Center. FSP - Full Service Partnership. A term created by the MHSA as a means to require funding from the Act to be used in a certain manner for individuals with serious mental illness. Required features of full service partnerships are that there be a written agreement, or individual services and supports plan, entered into with the client, and when appropriate, the client’s family. This plan may include the full spectrum of community services necessary to attain mutually agreed upon goals. The full spectrum of community services consists of, but is not limited to, mental health treatment, peer support, supportive services to assist the client, and when appropriate the client’s family, in obtaining and maintaining employment, housing, and/or education, wellness centers, culturally specific treatment approaches, crisis intervention/stabilization services, and family education services. Also included are non-mental health services and supports, to include food, clothing, housing, cost of health care and co-occurring disorder treatment, respite care, and wrap-around services to children. The County shall designate a personal service coordinator or case manager for each client to be the single point of responsibility for services and supports, and provide a qualified individual to be available to respond to the client/family 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The Full Service Partnership category is part of the Community Services and Supports (CSS) component of the MHSA. At least 50% of the funding for CSS is to go toward supporting the County’s full service partnership category. General System Development. A term created by the MHSA, and refers to a category of services funded in the Community Services and Supports component, and are similar to those services provided by community public mental health programs authorized in the Welfare and Institutions Code. MHSA funded services contained in the general system development category are designed to improve and supplement the county mental health service delivery system for all clients and their families. C-8 Greater Bay Area Regional Partnership. Regional partnership means a group of County approved individuals and/or organizations within geographic proximity that acts as an employment and education resource for the public mental health system. These individuals and/or organizations may be county staff, mental health service providers, clients, clients’ family members, and any individuals and/or organizations that have an interest in developing and supporting the workforce of the public mental health system. The Greater Bay Area Regional Partnership refers to an ongoing effort of individuals and/or organizations from the twelve county greater California bay area regions. HSD - Health Services Department. The largest department of County government. The mission of HSD is to care for and improve the health of all people in Contra Costa County with special attention to those who are most vulnerable to health problems. Behavioral Health Services is one of the nine divisions under HSD. HIPAA - Health Information Portability and Accountability Act. Enacted into law in 1996 and provides the following; 1) the ability to transfer and continue health insurance coverage for millions of American workers and their families when they change or lose their jobs, 2) reduce health care fraud and abuse, 3) mandates industry-wide standards for health care information on electronic billing and other processes, and 4) requires the protection and confidential handling of protected health information HPSA - Health Professional Shortage Area. A geographic area, population, or facility with a shortage of primary care, dental, or mental health providers and services. The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and State Primary Care Offices (PCOs) work together using public, private, and state-provided data to determine when such a shortage qualifies for designation as a HPSA. H3 – Health, Housing and Homeless Services Division. Division under Health Services that partners with Behavioral Health Services and focuses on the integration of housing and homeless services across this County’s health system. It coordinates health and homeless services across county and in the community; and works with key partners to develop strategies to address the community’s health and social needs. IMD – Institution for Mental Disease. Any institution that, by its overall character is a facility established and maintained primarily for the care and treatment of individuals with mental diseases. The guidelines used to evaluate if the overall character of a facility is that of an IMD are based on whether the facility: 1) Is licensed or accredited as a psychiatric facility; 2) Is under the jurisdiction of the state’s mental health authority; 3) Specializes in providing psychiatric/psychological care and treatment, which may be ascertained if indicated by a review of patients’ records, if an unusually large proportion of the staff has specialized psychiatric/psychological training, or if a facility is established and/or maintained primarily for the care and treatment of individuals with mental diseases; or 4) Has more than 50 percent of all its patients admitted based on a current need for institutionalization as a result of mental diseases. IMPACT - Improving Mood Providing Access to Collaborative Treatment. This refers to an evidence based mental health treatment for depression utilized specifically for older adults, and is provided in a primary care setting where older adults are C-9 concurrently receiving medical care for physical health problems. Up to twelve sessions of problem solving therapy with a year follow up is provided by a licensed clinical therapist, with supervision and support from a psychiatrist who specializes in older adults. The psychiatrist assesses for and monitors medications as needed, and both the clinician and psychiatrist work in collaboration with the primary care physician. INN - Innovation. A component of the MHSA that funds new or different patterns of service that contribute to informing the mental health system of care as to best or promising practices that can be subsequently added or incorporated into the system. These innovative programs accomplish one or more of the following objectives; 1) increase access to underserved groups, 2) increase the quality of services, to include better outcomes, 3) promote interagency collaboration, and 4) increase access to services. All new Innovation programs shall be reviewed and approved by the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission. The Act states that five per cent of a County’s revenues shall go for Innovation. Iron Triangle. Refers to the central area of the city of Richmond that is bordered on three sides by railroad tracks. The communities within this area have a high number of households living below the poverty level, and have a high need for social services, to include public mental health. Laura’s Law. See AB 1421. LCSW - Licensed Clinical Social Worker. Abbreviation used to describe term. See Clinical Specialist. LGBTQ - Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, Transgender, Questioning. Persons in these groups express norms different than the heterosexism of mainstream society, and often experience stigmatism as a result. Lesbian refers to women whose primary emotional, romantic, sexual or affectional attractions are to other women. Gay refers to men whose primary emotional, romantic, sexual or affectional attractions are to other men. Bi-sexual refers to men or women whose primary emotional, romantic, sexual, or affectional attractions are to both women and men. Transgender is a term that includes persons who cross-dress, are transsexual, and people who live substantial portions of their lives as other than their birth gender. People who are transgender can be straight, gay, lesbian or bi-sexual. Questioning refers to someone who is questioning their sexual and/or gender orientation. Licensed Clinical Specialist. In this context, refers to the term a County civil service classification that denotes a person meeting minimum mental health provider qualifications, to include possessing a license to practice mental health treatment by the California Board of Behavioral Sciences (BBS). An intern registered by BBS also qualifies. A licensed clinical specialist or registered intern can sign mental health treatment plans that qualify for federal financial participation through the Medi-Cal program. LMFT - Licensed Marriage Family Therapist. Abbreviation used to describe term. See Clinical Specialist. C-10 LPS – Lanterman Petris Short Act. The LPS Act refers to Sections 5150, 5151 and 5152 of the Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC). It is a California law governing the involuntary civil commitment of individuals who - due to mental illness - pose a danger to self or others, or who are gravely disabled and require inpatient psychiatric care. It was named for its co-authors — Assembly member Frank Lanterman and Senators Nicholas C. Petris and Alan Short. The intent of the LPS Act is to end inappropriate lifetime commitment of people with mental illness and firmly establish the right to due process in the commitment process while significantly reducing state institutional expense. LRP - Loan Repayment Program. Abbreviation used to describe term. MDFT - Multi-Dimensional Family Therapy. An evidence based comprehensive and multi-systemic family-based outpatient or partial hospitalization program for substance-abusing adolescents, adolescents with co-occurring substance use and mental disorders, and those at high risk for continued substance abuse. Treatment is delivered in a series of 12 to 16 weekly or twice weekly 60 to 90 minute sessions. Treatment focuses on the social interaction areas of parents and peers, the parents’ parenting practices, parent-adolescent interactions in therapy, and communications between family members and key social systems, such as school and child welfare. Medi-Cal. California’s version of the federal Medi-Caid program, in which health and mental health care can be provided by public health and mental health entities to individuals who do not have the ability to pay the full cost of care, and who meet medical necessity requirements. The federal Medi-Caid program reimburses states approximately half of the cost, with the remainder of the cost provided by a variety of state and local funding streams, to include the MHSA. Mental Health Career Pathway Program. Programs designed to educate, train, recruit prepare, and counsel individuals for entry into and advancement in jobs in the public mental health system. These programs are a category listed as part of the Workforce Education and Training (WET) component of the MHSA. MHP - Mental Health Plan. An agreement each county has with the state detailing the services that are to be provided. Mental Health Professional Shortage Designations. Term used by the federal Human Resource Services Administration (HRSA) to determine areas of the country where there is a verified shortage of mental health professionals. These geographical areas are then eligible to apply for a number of federal programs where financial incentives in recruiting and retention are applied to address the workforce shortage. MH – Mental Health. Abbreviation used for term. MHC - Mental Health Commission. A group of individuals, often with lived experience as a consumer and/or family member of a consumer, who are appointed as representatives of the County’s Board of Supervisors to provide 1) oversight and monitoring of the County’s mental health system, 2) advocacy for persons with serious C-11 mental illness, and 3) advise the Board of Supervisors and the mental health director. MHLAP - Mental Health Loan Assumption Program. A program that makes payments to an educational lending institution on behalf of an employee who has incurred debt while obtaining an education, provided the individual agrees to work in the public mental health system for a specified period of time and in a capacity that meets the employer’s workforce needs. The MHLAP is funded by the MHSA in the Workforce Education and Training component. MHSA - Mental Health Services Act or Proposition 63. Was voted into law by Californians in November 2004. This Act combines prevention services with a full range of integrated services to treat the whole person, with the goal of self-sufficiency for those who may have otherwise faced homelessness or dependence on the state for years to come. The MHSA has five components; community services and supports, prevention and early intervention, innovation, workforce education and training, and capital facilities and technology. An additional one percent of state income tax is collected on incomes exceeding one million dollars and deposited into a Mental Health Services Fund. These funds are provided to the County based upon an agreed upon fair share formula. MHSA Three Year Plan - Mental Health Services Act Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan. Each County prepares and submits a three year plan, which shall be updated at least annually; known as the Plan or Annual Update and approved by the County’s Board of Supervisors. The plan will be developed with local stakeholders by means of a community program planning process, and will include programs and funding planned for each component, as well as providing for a prudent reserve. Each plan or update shall indicate the number of children, adults and seniors to be served, as well as reports on the achievement of performance outcomes for services provided. MHSIP - Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program. Is a survey used in Contra Costa as required by DHCS. QI staff elicit feedback from survey sites regarding barriers to acceptable response rates, and based on this, implemented a variety of strategies including training a substantial volunteer workforce to assist with participant recruitment and survey completion. MHSOAC - Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission. Established by the MHSA to provide state oversight of MHSA programs and expenditures, and is responsible for annually reviewing and approving each county mental health program for expenditures pursuant to the components of Innovation and Prevention and Early Intervention. Money Management. Term that refers to services that can encompass all aspects of assisting an individual plan and manage financial benefits and resources. It can include counseling on the interplay of work and other sources of income on Medi-Cal, Medicare, Social Security Disability Income (SSDI), and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). It can include becoming a conservator of funds for an individual who has been deemed to be unable to manage their own funds. C-12 MST - Multi-Systemic Therapy. An evidence based mental health service that is a community-based, family driven treatment for antisocial/delinquent behavior in youth. The focus is on empowering parents and caregivers to solve current and future problems, and actively involves the entire ecology of the youth; family, peers, school and the neighborhood. NAMI - National Alliance on Mental Illness. The nation’s largest grassroots mental health organization dedicated to building better lives for the millions of Americans affected by mental illness. NAMI advocates for access to services, treatment, supports and research and is steadfast in its commitment to raise awareness and build a community for hope for all of those in need. NAMI is the foundation for hundreds of NAMI State Organizations, NAMI Affiliates and volunteer leaders who work in local communities across the country to raise awareness and provide essential and free education, advocacy and support group programs. In Contra Costa County, there is a NAMI Contra Costa Office or NAMI CC. Needs Assessment. Refers to part of the community program planning process (CPPP) where the mental health services and supports needs of the community are identified and assessed. This includes identifying populations, age groups and communities that remain unserved, underserved or inappropriately served. NOFA – Notice of Funding Availability. Abbreviation used to describe term. NPLH – No Place Like Home or Proposition 2. Allows the state to approve the use of the MHSA Funds to build and rehabilitate housing for those with mental illness who are homeless or at-risk of becoming homeless. OCE – Office for Consumer Empowerment. A Contra Costa County operated program under the Behavioral Health Services division that offers a range of trainings and supports by and for individuals who have experience receiving mental health services. The goal is to increase access to wellness and empowerment for consumers; and to engage in their own individual recovery and become active in the community. This office leads the SPIRIT, WREACH, and WRAP programs. OSHPD - Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development. A state department that assists California improve the structure and function of its healthcare delivery systems and promote healthcare accessibility. OSHPD is the state entity responsible for the implementation of various MHSA state level funded workforce education and training programs, such as the mental health loan assumption program, psychiatric residency programs, and several graduate stipend and internship programs. Outreach and Engagement. In this context, is a MHSA term that is a community services and support category, and a category in which prevention and early intervention services can be provided. Services are designed to reach out and engage individuals in mental health care which have a serious mental illness, or are at risk of developing a serious mental illness. These are individuals who have not sought services in a traditional manner due to cultural or linguistic barriers. C-13 Peer Provider. Term that refers to a professional who brings lived experience as a mental health consumer to their provision of services. They often participate as a member of a multi-disciplinary team providing mental health treatment, and assist consumers and their families understand, acquire and navigate the various services and resources needed. In Contra Costa County, Peer Providers have a job classification of Community Support Worker. PEI - Prevention and Early Intervention. A term created by the MHSA, and refers to a component of funding in which services are designed to prevent mental illnesses from becoming severe and disabling. This means providing outreach and engagement to increase recognition of early signs of mental illness, and intervening early in the onset of a mental illness. Twenty percent of funds received by the MHSA are to be spent for prevention and early intervention services. PES - Psychiatric Emergency Services. A unit of the Contra Costa County Regional Medical Center located next door to the Emergency Room in the county hospital in Martinez. It operated 24 hours a day, seven days a week, and consists of psychiatrists, nurses and mental health clinicians who are on call and available to respond to individuals who are brought in due to a psychiatric emergency. Persons who are seen are either treated and released, or admitted to the in-patient psychiatric hospital ward. PhotoVoice Empowerment Program. The County sponsors classes designed to enable individuals to create artwork consisting of a photograph and a personally written story that speak to or represent the challenges of prejudice, discrimination and ignorance that people with behavioral health challenges face. These artworks are then displayed in the community to educate, raise awareness and reduce stigma. PIER Model - Portland Identification and Early Referral Model. This is an evidence based treatment developed by the PIERS Institute of Portland, Maine. It is an early intervention program for youth, ages 12-25 which are at risk for developing psychosis. It is a multi-disciplinary team approach consisting of a structured interview to assess risk for psychosis, multi-family group therapy, psychiatric care, family psycho-education, supported education and employment, and occupational therapy. PSC - Personal Service Coordinators. Refers to a mental health clinician or case manager who develops and implements an individual services and support plan with an individual diagnosed with a serious mental illness, and who is part of a full service partner program under the MHSA. This plan contains a diagnosis, level of severity, agreed upon goals, and actions by the consumer, the personal services coordinator, and other service providers to reach those goals. The personal service coordinator provides therapy, and additionally takes responsibility for the delivery and/or coordination of both mental health and rehabilitation services that assist the consumer reach his/her goals. PTSD - Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. An emotional illness that that is classified as an anxiety disorder, and usually develops as a result of a terribly frightening, life-threatening, or otherwise highly unsafe experience. PTSD sufferers re-experience the traumatic event or events in some way, tend to avoid places, people, or other things that C-14 remind them of the event (avoidance), and are exquisitely sensitive to normal life experiences (hyper arousal). Public Health Services. A division under Health Services whose mission is to promote and protect the health and well-being of individuals, families and community in Contra Costa County. Public Mental Health System. This term is used to describe the public system that is in place to provide mental health services. There are 64 counties and 2 cities that receive MHSA funds to support their public mental health system. Each county’s system is uniquely structured where services are provided by county staff or through contractors; such as community based organizations and other agencies. Pre-Vocational Employment Services. These are services that enable a person to actively engage in finding and keeping a job. Often the services remove barriers to employment services, such as counseling on how working affects benefits, stabilizing medications, obtaining a driver’s license or general education diploma, and resolving immigration or other legal issues. Prudent Reserve. Term created by the MHSA, and refers to a County setting aside sufficient MHSA revenues in order to ensure that services do not have to be significantly reduced in years in which revenues are below the average of previous years. Psychiatric Residency. Physicians who specialize in psychiatry complete a four year residency program at one of several schools of psychiatry, such as that located at the University of California at San Francisco. This is essentially a paid work study arrangement, where they practice under close supervision and concurrently take coursework. At the final residency year the psychiatrist can elect to work in a medical setting, teach, do research, or work in a community mental health setting. QA/ QI - Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement. Entities in Contra Costa County responsible for monitoring the Mental Health Plan’s effectiveness by providing oversight and review of clinics, organizations, and clinicians providing services to consumers. The goals are to perform program development and coordination work to implement and maintain a quality management program that effectively measures, assesses, and continuously improves the access to and quality of care and services provided to the County's mental health consumers. The Quality Management Coordinator is responsible for Chairing and facilitating the Quality Improvement Committee (QIC) and ensuring members receive timely and relevant information. RFA - Request for Application. Abbreviation used to describe term. RFI - Request for Information. Abbreviation used to describe term. RFP - Request for Proposal. Abbreviation used to describe term. RFQ - Request for Qualifications. Abbreviation used to describe term. C-15 RHD - Reducing Health Disparities. Abbreviation used to describe term. SAMHSA - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. The agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services that leads public health efforts to advance the behavioral health of the nation. SAMHSA's mission is to reduce the impact of substance abuse and mental illness on America's communities. SB - Senate Bill. Abbreviation used to describe term. SNHP – Special Needs Housing Program. Allows local governments to use MHSA and other local funds to provide financing for the development of permanent supportive rental housing that includes units dedicated for individuals with serious mental illness, and their families, who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. SNF - Skilled Nursing Facility. A special facility or part of a hospital that provides medically necessary services from nurses, physical and occupational therapists, speech pathologists and audiologist. A SNF aims to prevent hospitalizations, optimize antipsychotic medication use, and serve as an intermediate step into the community. STRTP – Short Term Residential Treatment Program. A residential treatment model that serves youth who have high-level mental health needs or are seriously emotionally disturbed. The goal of STRTPs is to focus on stabilizing high-needs youth to allow an expedient and successful transition to a home setting. SED - Seriously Emotionally Disturbed. Children from birth up to age eighteen with serious emotional disturbance are persons who currently or at any time during the past year have had a diagnosable mental, behavioral, or emotional disorder of sufficient duration to meet diagnostic criteria specified within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual and results in functional impairment which substantially interferes with or limits the child's role or functioning in family, school, or community activities. SMI - Serious Mental Illness. Adults with a serious mental illness are persons eighteen years and older who, at any time during a given year, have a diagnosable mental, behavioral, or emotional disorder that meet the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, and the disorder has resulted in functional impairment which substantially interferes with or limits one or more major life activities. SOC – System of Care. Term used to refer to this county’s public mental health system. SPIRIT - Service Provider Individualized Recovery Intensive Training. A recovery oriented, peer led classroom and experiential-based, college accredited educational program for individuals with lived experience as a consumer of mental health services. It is sponsored by Contra Costa Mental Health and Contra Costa Community College, and successful completion satisfies the minimum qualifications to be considered for employment by the County as a Community Support Worker. Stakeholders. Stakeholders is a term defined in the California Code of Regulations to C-16 mean individuals or entities with an interest in mental health services, including but not limited to individuals with serious mental illness and/or serious emotional disturbance and/or their families, providers of mental health and/or related services such as physical health care and/or social services, educators and/or representatives of education, representatives of law enforcement, and any organization that represents the interests of individuals with serious mental illness and/or serious emotional disturbance and/or their families. Stigma and Discrimination. In this context, refers to the negative thoughts and/or behaviors that form an inaccurate generalization or judgment, and adversely affects the recovery, wellness and resiliency of persons with mental health issues. These thoughts and behaviors can include any person who has an influence on a person’s mental health well-being, to include the person experiencing the mental health issue. SUD - Substance Use Disorder. A disorder in which the use of one or more substances leads to a clinically significant impairment or distress. Although the term substance can refer to any physical matter, substance abuse refers to the overuse of, or dependence on, a drug leading to effects that are detrimental to the individual's physical and mental health, or the welfare of others. The disorder is characterized by a pattern of continued pathological use of a medication, non-medically indicated drug or toxin which results in repeated adverse social consequences related to drug use, such as failure to meet work, family, or school obligations, interpersonal conflicts, or legal problems. STEP - Systematic Training for Effective Parenting. A parent education program published as a series of books developed and published by the psychologists Don Dinkmeyer Sr., Gary D. McKay and Don Dinkmeyer Jr. The publication was supplemented by an extensive concept for training and proliferation. STEP has reached more than four million parents and has been translated into several languages. It provides skills training for parents dealing with frequently encountered challenges with their children that often result from autocratic parenting styles. STEP is rooted in Adlerian psychology and promotes a more participatory family structure by fostering responsibility, independence, and competence in children; improving communication between parents and children; and helping children learn from the natural and logical consequences of their own choices. Supported Employment. Supported employment is a federal vocational rehabilitation term that means competitive work for individuals with the most significant disabilities that occurs in integrated work settings, or settings in which individuals are working toward competitive work. Such work is consistent with the strengths, resources, priorities, concerns, abilities, capabilities, interests, and informed choice of the individuals. Supported employment usually means that a professional support person, or job coach, assists the individual in a competitive work setting until assistance is no longer needed. Supportive Housing. A combination of housing and services intended as a cost-effective way to help people live more stable, productive lives. Supportive housing is widely believed to work well for those who face the most complex challenges—individuals and families confronted with homelessness and who also have very low C-17 incomes and/or serious, persistent issues that may include substance abuse, addiction or alcoholism, mental illness, HIV/AIDS, or other serious challenges to a successful life. Supportive housing can be coupled with such social services as job training, life skills training, alcohol and drug abuse programs, community support services, such as child care and educational programs, and case management to populations in need of assistance. Supportive housing is intended to be a pragmatic solution that helps people have better lives while reducing, to the extent feasible, the overall cost of care. TAY - Transition Age Youth. A term meaning individuals who are between the age of 16 years and 25 years of age. Specific mental health programs that address this age group are in the adult system of care, and were designed to assist in the transition of services from the children’s system of care, where individuals stop receiving services at 18. Triple P - Positive Parenting Program. An evidence based practice designed to increase parents’ sense of competence in their parenting abilities. It is a multilevel system of family intervention that aims to prevent severe emotional and behavioral disturbances in children by promoting positive and nurturing relationships between parent and child. Improved family communication and reduced conflict reduces the risk that children will develop a variety of behavioral and emotional problems. WET - Workforce Education and Training. A term created by the MHSA, and refers to the component of the MHSA that funds programs and service that assist in the recruitment and retention of a skilled and culturally competent mental health workforce. WIC - Welfare and Institutions Code. Regulations set that address services relating to welfare, dependent children, mental health, handicapped, elderly, delinquency, foster care, Medi-Cal, food stamps, rehabilitation, and long-term care, to name a few. WRAP - Wellness Recovery Action Plan. An evidence-based practice that is used by people who are dealing with mental health and other kinds of health challenges, and by people who want to attain the highest possible level of wellness. It was developed by a group of people who have a lived experience with mental health difficulties and who were searching for ways to resolve issues that had been troubling them for a long time. WRAP involves listing one’s personal resources and wellness tools, and then using those resources to develop action plans to use in specific situations. Wraparound Services. An intensive, individualized care management process for children with serious emotional disturbances. During the wraparound process, a team of individuals who are relevant to the well-being of the child or youth, such as family members, other natural supports, service providers, and agency representatives collaboratively develop an individualized plan of care, implement this plan, and evaluate success over time. The wraparound plan typically includes formal services and interventions, together with community services and interpersonal support and assistance provided by friends and other people drawn from the family’s social networks. The team convenes frequently to measure the plan’s components against relevant indicators of success. Plan components and strategies are revised when outcomes are not being achieved. C-18 WREACH - Wellness Recovery Education for Acceptance, Choice and Hope. The WREACH Speaker’s Bureau is designed to reduce the stigma that consumers and family members often face in the workplace, behavioral and physical health care systems, and in their communities. The WREACH program forms connections between people in the community and people with lived mental health and co-occurring disorders experiences by providing opportunities for sharing stories of recovery and resiliency, and sharing current information on health treatment and supports. Workshops are held to teach people and their families how to write and present their recovery and resilience stories. These individuals are then connected with audiences that include behavioral health providers, high school and college staff and students, law enforcement, physical health providers and the general community. C-19 (This page left intentionally blank) D-1 Appendix D MHSA COUNTY COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION County: Contra Costa Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan Annual Update Local Mental Health Director Name: Matthew P. White, M.D. Telephone Number: 925-957-5150 E-mail: Matthew.P.White@cchealth.org Program Lead Name: Warren Hayes Telephone Number: 925-957-2616 E-mail: Warren.Hayes@cchealth.org County Mental Health Mailing Address: Contra Costa County Mental Health Administration 1340 Arnold Drive #200 Martinez, CA 94553 I hereby certify that I am the official responsible for the administration of county mental health services in and for said county and that the County has complied with all pertinent regulations and guidelines, laws and statutes of the Mental Health Services Act in preparing and submitting this annual update, including stakeholder participation and non-supplantation requirements. This Three year Program and Expenditure Plan has been developed with the participation of stakeholders, in accordance with Welfare and Institutions Code Section 5848 and Title 9 of the California Code of Regulations section 3300, Community Planning Process. The draft Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan was circulated to representatives of stakeholder interests and any interested party for 30 days for review and comment and a public hearing was held by the local mental health board. All input has been considered with adjustments made, as appropriate. The annual update and expenditure plan, attached hereto, was adopted by the County Board of Supervisors on June ______, 2019. Mental Health Services Act funds are and will be used in compliance with Welfare and Institutions Code section 5891 and Title 9 of the California Code of Regulations section 3410, Non-Supplant. All documents in the attached annual update are true and correct. Matthew P. White, M.D. Date Contra Costa Mental Health Director D-2 (This page left intentionally blank) D-3 MHSA COUNTY FISCAL ACCOUNTABILITY CERTIFICATION County/City: Contra Costa County X Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update Local Mental Health Director Name: Matthew P. White Telephone Number: 925-957-5150 E-mail: Matthew.P.White@cchealth.org County Auditor-Controller / City Financial Officer Name: Robert R. Campbell Telephone Number: 925-646-2181 E-mail: bcamp@ac.cccounty.us Local Mental Health Mailing Address: Contra Costa County Mental Health Administration 1340 Arnold Dr. #200 Martinez, CA 94553 I hereby certify that the Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan, Annual Update or Annual Revenue and Expenditure Report is true and correct and that the County has complied with all fiscal accountability requirements as required by law or as directed by the State Department of Health Care Services and the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, and that all expenditures are consistent with the requirements of the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), including Welfare and Institutions Code (WIC) sections 5813.5, 5830, 5840, 5847, 5891, and 5892; and Title 9 of the California Code of Regulations sections 3400 and 3410. I further certify that all expenditures are consistent with an approved plan or update and that MHSA funds will only be used for programs specified in the Mental Health Services Act. Other than funds placed in a reserve in accordance with an approved plan, any funds allocated to a county which are not spent for their authorized purpose within the time period specified in WIC section 5892(h), shall revert to the state to be deposited into the fund and available for counties in future years. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of this state that the foregoing and the attached update/revenue and expenditure report is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Local Mental Health Director (PRINT) Signature Date I hereby certify that for the fiscal year ended June 30, , the County/City has maintained an interest-bearing local Mental Health Services (MHS) Fund (WIC 5892(f)); and that the County’s/City’s financial statements are audited annually by an independent auditor and the most recent audit report is dated for the fiscal year ended June 30, ______. I further certify that for the fiscal year ended June 30, , the State MHSA distributions were recorded as revenues in the local MHS Fund; that County/City MHSA expenditures and transfers out were appropriated by the Board of Supervisors and recorded in compliance with such appropriations; and that the County/City has complied with WIC section 5891(a), in that local MHS funds may not be loaned to a county general fund or any other county fund. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of this state that the foregoing, and if there is a revenue and expenditure report attached, is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. County Auditor Controller / City Financial Officer (PRINT) Signature Date 1 Welfare and Institutions Code Sections 5847(b)(9) and 5899(a) Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan, Annual Update, and RER Certification (07/22/2013) D-4 (This page left intentionally blank) County: Contra Costa Date: A B C D E F Community Services and Supports Prevention and Early Intervention Innovation Workforce Education and Training Capital Facilities and Technological Needs Prudent Reserve Total A. FY 2017/18 Funding 1. Unspent Funds from Prior Fiscal Years 33,351,035 4,924,948 4,775,229 319,579 992,492 - 44,363,283 2. New FY2017/18 Funding 35,879,436 8,966,924 2,359,717 47,206,077 3.Transfer in FY2017/18a/(1,600,000)1,600,000 - 4. Available Funding for FY2017/18 67,630,471 13,891,872 7,134,946 1,919,579 992,492 - 91,569,360 B. FY2017/18 MHSA Expenditures 29,756,637 6,626,940 2,472,018 1,606,283 11,205 - 40,473,083 C. Estimated FY2018/19 Funding 1. Unspent Funds from Prior Fiscal Years 37,873,834 7,264,932 4,662,928 313,296 981,287 - 51,096,277 2. Estimated New FY2018/19 Funding 35,436,667 8,859,167 2,331,360 46,627,194 3.Transfer in FY2018/19a/(5,000,000) 5,000,000 4. Estimated Available Funding for FY2018/19 68,310,501 16,124,099 6,994,288 5,313,296 981,287 - 97,723,471 D. Projected FY2018/19 Expenditures 34,110,198 8,844,080 1,420,063 2,344,579 63,194 - 46,782,114 E. Estimated FY2019/20 Funding 1. Estimated Unspent Funds from Prior Fiscal Years 34,200,303 7,280,019 5,574,226 2,968,717 918,093 - 50,941,357 2. Estimated New FY2019/20 Funding 41,997,321 9,724,330 2,559,034 54,280,685 3.Transfer in FY2019/20a/(3,000,000) 3,000,000 4. Estimated Available Funding for FY2019/20 73,197,624 17,004,349 8,133,260 2,968,717 3,918,093 - 105,222,042 F. Budgeted FY2019/20 Expenditures 37,690,970 9,191,606 2,200,628 2,668,145 3,000,000 - 54,751,349 G. Estimated FY2019/20 Unspent Fund Balance 35,506,654 7,812,743 5,932,632 300,572 918,093 - 50,470,693 H. Estimated Local Prudent Reserve Balance 1. Estimated Local Prudent Reserve Balance on June 30, 2018 7,579,248 I. Estimated Beginning Balance for FY 2019/20 1. Estimated Unspent Funds from Fiscal Year 2018-19 50,941,357 2. Estimated Local Prudent Reserve Balance on June 30, 2018 7,579,248 3. Estimated Total Beginning Balance 58,520,605 4/26/2019 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Funding Summary MHSA Funding Appendix E E-1 County: Contra Costa Date:May 20, 2019 A B C D E F Total Mental Health Expenditures CSS Funding Medi-Cal FFP 1991 Realignment Behavioral Health Subaccount Other Funding FSP Programs 1. Children 2,443,687 2,443,687 2. Transition Age Youth 1,793,353 1,793,353 3. Adults 3,210,135 3,210,135 4. Assisted Outpatient Treatment 2,358,271 2,358,271 5. Adults Clinic FSP Support 855,982 855,982 6. Recovery Center 970,728 970,728 7. Crisis Residential Center 2,312,360 2,312,360 8. Housing Services 6,082,491 6,082,491 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Non-FSP Programs 1. Older Adult Mental Health Program 3,385,811 3,385,811 2. Children's Wraparound Support 1,316,723 1,316,723 3. Miller Wellness Center 323,300 323,300 4. Clinic Support 1,033,493 1,033,493 5. Forensic Team 213,738 213,738 6. Mobile Response Team 118,756 118,756 7. Concord Health Center 277,271 277,271 8. Liaison Staffs 134,864 134,864 9. Quality Assurance 1,100,067 1,100,067 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. CSS Administration 1,825,608 1,825,608 CSS MHSA Housing Program Assigned Funds Total CSS Program Estimated Expenditures 29,756,637 29,756,637 0 0 0 0 FSP Programs as Percent of Total 67.3% FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Community Services and Supports (CSS) Component Worksheet Fiscal Year 2017/18 E-2 County: Contra Costa Date:May 20, 2019 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Community Services and Supports (CSS) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated CSS Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding FSP Programs 1. Children 2,361,215 2,361,215 2. Transition Age Youth 1,357,321 1,357,321 3. Adult 3,522,452 3,522,452 4. Adult Mental Health Clinic Support 1,075,781 1,075,781 5. Assisted Outpatient Treatment 2,101,023 2,101,023 6. Wellness and Recovery Centers 986,682 986,682 7. Crisis Residential Center 2,134,103 2,134,103 8. MHSA Housing Services 8,406,256 8,406,256 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Non-FSP Programs 1. Older Adult Mental Health Program 3,582,500 3,582,500 2. Children's Wraparound Support 1,284,724 1,284,724 3. Miller Wellness Center 338,234 338,234 4. Concord Health Center 329,607 329,607 5. Liaison Staff 148,145 148,145 6. Clinic Support 1,131,444 1,131,444 7. Forensic Team 261,503 261,503 8. Quality Assurance 1,125,030 1,125,030 9. EPSDT 466,147 466,147 10. Mobile Response Team 891,746 891,746 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. CSS Administration 2,606,286 2,606,286 CSS MHSA Housing Program Assigned Funds Total CSS Program Estimated Expenditures 34,110,198 34,110,198 0 0 0 FSP Programs as Percent of Total 64.3% Fiscal Year 2018/19 E-3 County: Contra Costa Date:May 20, 2019 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Community Services and Supports (CSS) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated CSS Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding FSP Programs 1. Children 3,313,400 3,313,400 2. Transition Age Youth 2,539,010 2,539,010 3. Adult 3,072,849 3,072,849 4. Adult Mental Health Clinic Support 1,880,069 1,880,069 5. Assisted Outpatient Treatment 2,537,928 2,537,928 6. Wellness and Recovery Centers 956,136 956,136 7. Crisis Residential Center 2,204,052 2,204,052 8. MHSA Housing Services 6,680,652 6,680,652 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. Non-FSP Programs 1. Older Adult Mental Health Program 3,594,402 3,594,402 2. Children's Wraparound Support 4,204,155 4,204,155 3. Miller Wellness Center 339,296 339,296 4. Concord Health Center 281,214 281,214 5. Liaison Staff 147,613 147,613 6. Clinic Support 1,367,468 1,367,468 7. Forensic Team 1,008,569 1,008,569 8. Quality Assurance 1,324,008 1,324,008 9. Administrative Support 2,240,149 2,240,149 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. CSS Administration CSS MHSA Housing Program Assigned Funds Total CSS Program Estimated Expenditures 37,690,970 37,690,970 0 0 0 0 FSP Programs as Percent of Total 61.5% Fiscal Year 2019/20 E-4 County:Contra Costa Date:May 20, 2019 A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated PEI Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding PEI Programs - Prevention 1.Outreach for Increasing Recognition of Early Signs of Mental Illness 957,035 957,035 2. Prevention 1,860,512 1,860,512 3. Access and Linkage to Treatment 211,518 211,518 4.Improving Timely Access to Mental Health Services for Underserved Population 847,827 847,827 5. Stigma and Discrimination Reduction 208,595 208,595 6. Suicide Prevention 367,307 367,307 7. 8. 9. 10. PEI Programs - Early Intervention 11. First Hope 1,975,625 1,975,625 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. PEI Administration 198,520 198,520 PEI Assigned Funds 0 Total PEI Program Estimated Expenditures 6,626,940 6,626,940 0 0 0 0 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Component Worksheet Fiscal Year 2017/18 E-5 County:Contra Costa Date:May 20, 2019 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated PEI Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding PEI Programs - Prevention 1. Outreach for Increasing Recognition of Early Signs of Mental Illness 1,033,447 1,033,447 2. Prevention 2,001,690 2,001,690 3. Access and Linkage to Treatment 204,900 204,900 4. Improving Timely Access to Mental Health Services for Underserved Population 1,424,676 1,424,676 5. Stigma and Discrimination Reduction 296,643 296,643 6. Suicide Prevention 415,100 415,100 7. 8. 9. 10. PEI Programs - Early Intervention 11. First Hope 3,254,672 3,254,672 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. PEI Administration 212,951 212,951 PEI Assigned Funds Total PEI Program Estimated Expenditures 8,844,080 8,844,080 0 0 0 0 Fiscal Year 2018/19 E-6 County:Contra Costa Date:May 20, 2019 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated PEI Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding PEI Programs - Prevention 1. Outreach for Increasing Recognition of Early Signs of Mental Illness 1,059,624 1,059,624 2. Prevention 1,704,999 1,704,999 3. Access and Linkage to Treatment 1,198,430 1,198,430 4. Improving Timely Access to Mental Health Services for Underserved Population 1,571,522 1,571,522 5. Stigma and Discrimination Reduction 308,741 308,741 6. Suicide Prevention 461,892 461,892 7.0 155,054 155,054 8. 9. 10. PEI Programs - Early Intervention 11. First Hope 2,731,344 2,731,344 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. PEI Administration PEI Assigned Funds Total PEI Program Estimated Expenditures 9,191,606 9,191,606 0 0 0 0 Fiscal Year 2019/20 E-7 County:Contra Costa Date:May 20, 2019 A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated INN Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding INN Programs 1. Coaching to Wellness 684,307 684,307 2. Partners in Aging 179,967 179,967 3. Overcoming Transportation Barriers 105,759 105,759 4. WELL Project 222,540 222,540 5. LBGTQ- Youth 742,835 742,835 6. CBSST 33,834 33,834 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. INN Administration 502,775 502,775 Total INN Program Estimated Expenditures 2,472,018 2,472,018 0 0 0 0 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Innovations (INN) Component Worksheet Fiscal Year 2017/18 E-8 County:Contra Costa Date:May 20, 2019 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Innovations (INN) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated INN Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding INN Programs 1. CBSST 162,339 162,339 2. CORE 188,327 188,327 3. WELL Project 50,754 50,754 4. Coaching to Wellness 383,645 383,645 5. Partners in Aging 129,977 129,977 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. INN Administration 505,021 505,021 Total INN Program Estimated Expenditures 1,420,063 1,420,063 0 0 0 0 I. Estimated Beginning Balance for FY 2016/17 Fiscal Year 2018/19 E-9 County:Contra Costa Date:May 20, 2019 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Innovations (INN) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated INN Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding INN Programs 1. Coaching to Wellness 100,000 100,000 2. Partners in Aging 502,909 502,909 3. Overcoming Transportation Barriers 192,094 192,094 4. WELL Project 256,154 256,154 5. LBGTQ- Youth 449,471 449,471 6. CBSST 700,000 700,000 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. INN Administration Total INN Program Estimated Expenditures 2,200,628 2,200,628 0 0 0 0 Fiscal Year 2019/20 E-10 County: Contra Costa Date: May 20, 2019 A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated WET Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding WET Programs 1. Workforce Staffing Support 39,704 39,704 2. Training and Technical Support 373,013 373,013 3. Mental Health Career Pathway Program 303,981 303,981 4. Internship Programs 404,674 404,674 5. Financial Incentive Programs 300,000 300,000 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. WET Administration 184,911 184,911 Total WET Program Estimated Expenditures 1,606,283 1,606,283 0 0 0 0 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Workforce, Education and Training (WET) Component Worksheet Fiscal Year 2017/18 E-11 County: Contra Costa Date: May 20, 2019 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Workforce, Education and Training (WET) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated WET Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding WET Programs 1. Workforce Staffing Support 430,491 430,491 2. Training and Technical Support 225,969 225,969 3. Mental Health Career Pathway Program 353,155 353,155 4. Internship Programs 450,858 450,858 5. Financial Incentive Programs 300,000 300,000 6. Family Support Network Volunteer Program 584,107 584,107 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. WET Administration Total WET Program Estimated Expenditures 2,344,579 2,344,579 0 0 0 0 I. Estimated Beginning Balance for FY 2016/17 Fiscal Year 2018/19 E-12 County: Contra Costa Date: May 20, 2019 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Workforce, Education and Training (WET) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated WET Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding WET Programs 1. Workforce Staffing Support 1,303,783 1,303,783 2. Training and Technical Support 244,007 244,007 3. Mental Health Career Pathway Program 460,435 460,435 4. Internship Programs 359,920 359,920 5. Financial Incentive Programs 300,000 300,000 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. WET Administration Total WET Program Estimated Expenditures 2,668,145 2,668,145 0 0 0 0 Fiscal Year 2019/20 E-13 County: Contra Costa Date: May 20, 2019 A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated CFTN Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding CFTN Programs - Capital Facilities Projects 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. CFTN Programs - Technological Needs Projects 11.Electronic Health Records System - Administrative Support11,205 11,205 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. CFTN Administration Total CFTN Program Estimated Expenditures 11,205 11,205 0 0 0 0 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Capital Facilities/Technological Needs (CFTN) Component Worksheet Fiscal Year 2017/18 E-14 County: Contra Costa Date: May 20, 2019 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Capital Facilities/Technological Needs (CFTN) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated CFTN Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding CFTN Programs - Capital Facilities Projects 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. CFTN Programs - Technological Needs Projects 11.Electronic Health Records System - Administrative Support63,194 63,194 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. CFTN Administration Total CFTN Program Estimated Expenditures 63,194 63,194 0 0 0 0 Fiscal Year 2018/19 E-15 County: Contra Costa Date: May 20, 2019 FY 2017-18 Through FY 2019-20 Three-Year Mental Health Services Act Expenditure Plan Capital Facilities/Technological Needs (CFTN) Component Worksheet A B C D E F Estimated Total Mental Health Expenditures Estimated CFTN Funding Estimated Medi- Cal FFP Estimated 1991 Realignment Estimated Behavioral Health Subaccount Estimated Other Funding CFTN Programs - Capital Facilities Projects 1. Oak Grove Improvement 3,000,000 3,000,000 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. CFTN Programs - Technological Needs Projects 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. CFTN Administration Total CFTN Program Estimated Expenditures 3,000,000 3,000,000 0 0 0 0 Fiscal Year 2019/20 E-16 (This page left intentionally blank) E-17 PUBLIC COMMENT PUBLIC HEARING MHSA FISCAL YEAR 2019/2020 Annual Update to the Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan F-1 Appendix F F-2 F-3 The Mental Health Commission (MHC) Hosts a Public Hearing for the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Plan FY 19-20 Update Wednesday, May 1st, 2019 from 4:30pm-6:30pm At: 1875 Arnold Drive, Martinez, CA I.Call to Order/Introductions II.RECEIVE PRESENTATION on West County Re-entry, Treatment and Housing Facility Update- with Tom Chalk, Captain, West County Detention Division| III. RECEIVE Behavioral Health Services Report- Dr. Matthew White, Medical Director and Acting Behavioral Health Director, Contra Cost Behavioral Health Services IV.DISCUSS Mental Health Awareness Month Presentation to the Board of Supervisors V.CONSIDER and APPROVE recommended revisions to February 6th, 2019 Meeting Minutes VI. APPROVE April 3 rd, 2019 Meeting Minutes VII.Public Comments VIII.Commissioner Comments IX.Chair Comments/Announcements X.Adjourn ◊The Public Hearing will follow the Commission Meeting ◊ Current (2019) Members of the Contra Costa County Mental Health Commission Barbara Serwin, District II (Chair); Leslie May, District V(Vice Chair); Supervisor Diane Burgis, BOS Representative, District III; Joe Metro, District V; Douglas Dunn, District III; Diana MaKieve, District II; Geri Stern, District I; Gina Swirsding, District I; Tasha Kamegai-Karadi, District IV; Sam Yoshioka, District IV; John Kincaid, District II; Candace Andersen, Alternate BOS Representative for District II F-4 I.Call to Order the Public Hearing on the Mental Health Services Act Three Year Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Update II.Opening Comments by the Mental Health Commission Chair III.Fiscal Years 2017 to 2020 Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan- by Warren Hayes, Mental Health Program Chief, Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services This plan is electronically available for review at : http://cchealth.org/mentalhealth/mhsa/ IV.Public Comment In the interest of time and equal opportunity, speakers are requested to please adhere to a 3 minute time limit, per person. In accordance to the Brown Act, if a member of the public addresses an item not on the agenda, no response, discussion or action on the item will occur, except for the purpose of clarification. V.Commissioner Comments VI.Develop a list of Comments and Recommendations to the County Mental Health Administration and to the Board of Supervisors VII.Adjourn Public Hearing Authority for Public Hearing: California Welfare and Institutions Code(WIC) § 5848 (a)Each three-year program and expenditure plan and update shall be developed with local stakeholders, including adults and seniors with severe mental illness, families of children, adults, and seniors with severe mental illness, providers of services, law enforcement agencies, education, social services agencies, veterans, representatives from veterans organizations, providers of alcohol and drug services, health care organizations, and other important interests. Counties shall demonstrate a partnership with constituents and stakeholders throughout the process that includes meaningful stakeholder involvement on mental health policy, program planning, and implementation, monitoring, quality improvement, evaluation, and budget allocations. A draft plan and update shall be prepared and circulated for review and comment for at least 30 days to representatives of stakeholder interests and any interested party who has requested a copy of the draft plans. (b)The mental health board established pursuant to Section 5604 shall conduct a public hearing on the draft three- year program and expenditure plan and annual updates at the close of the 30-day comment period required by subdivision (a). Each adopted three-year program and expenditure plan and update shall include any substantive written recommendations for revisions. The adopted three-year program and expenditure plan or update shall summarize and analyze the recommended revisions. The mental health board shall review the adopted plan or update and make recommendations to the county mental health department for revisions. (c)The plans shall include reports on the achievement of performance outcomes for services pursuant to Part 3 (commencing with Section 5800 ), Part 3.6 (commencing with Section 5840 ), and Part 4 (commencing with Section 5850 ) funded by the Mental Health Services Fund and established jointly by the State Department of Health Care Services and the Mental Health Services Oversight and Accountability Commission, in collaboration with the County Behavioral Health Directors Association of California. F-5 Public Hearing Presentation MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for FY 2019-20 Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services is pleased to present the Draft Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for Fiscal Year 20119-20. Included for your consideration this evening are copies of the draft plan update, and copies of a summary outline of the plan. We welcome your input. The Three Year Plan Update proposes to set aside $54.7 million for fiscal year 2019-20 in order to fund over 80 programs and plan elements. The Three Year Plan Update includes $37.7 million to fund 39 programs and plan elements in the Community Services and Supports component that will serve approximately 2,000 individuals who are experiencing a serious mental illness or serious emotional disturbance. Our Prevention and Early Intervention component plans to set aside $9.2 million to fund 26 programs serving approximately 26,000 persons and are designed to prevent mental illness from becoming severe and debilitating. $2.2 million is budgeted for five Innovative Projects, and $2.7 million is set aside for programs to recruit, train, retain and support our public mental health workforce. Overall, with one exception, these component totals represent a 3% increase in the cost of doing business and are totals that were approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to the start of this current three year period. The one exception is our request to the Board to transfer $3 million dollars from our unspent fund balance to the Capital Facilities/Information Technology component. These funds are to pay for construction costs for re-purposing our county owned Oak Grove facilities to house both a Short Term Residential Treatment Program and an Assertive Community Treatment Program for transition age youth. We are anticipating launching the programs in the fall of 2020, and thus the ongoing service costs will be requested in the FY 2020-2023 Three Year Plan. An inclusive Community Program Planning Process engaged stakeholders in identifying service gaps, prioritizing community public mental health needs, and suggesting strategies to meet these needs. All identified service gaps and prioritized needs from the Community Program Planning Process are referenced and addressed in the Three Year Plan Update. FY 2017-18 performance indicators for our Full Service Partnerships and our Prevention and Early Intervention programs are included in the program description, and individual program outcomes are listed by program in Appendix B. No new MHSA funded programs, or plan elements are being added for FY 2019-20. We anticipate that the plan’s proposed total budget spending authority will not need to be reduced in the foreseeable future, and that all MHSA programs and plan elements can be sustained at their proposed level of funding. As per direction of the California Department of Health Care Services the draft plan update will include our plan, as submitted last year, to spend by June 2020 funds that F-6 DHCS has identified as potentially subject to reversion back to the state. This plan will be included in our current Plan Update submittal to DHCS. Again, we welcome both Public and Commission comment and input this evening. The Draft Three Year Plan will be sent to the Board of Supervisors for review once we have included our written response to any substantive recommendations for revisions received by either the Public or the Commission. F-7 MENTAL HEALTH COMMISSION Mental Health Services Act Three Year Plan Public Hearing May 1st, 2019 1875 Arnold Drive, Martinez, CA First Draft Agenda Item / Discussion Action /Follow-Up I.Call to Order the Public Hearing on the Mental Health Services Act Three Year Plan Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Update / Introductions Cmsr. B. Serwin, MHC Chair, called the public hearing to order @ 5:34pm Members Present: Chair- Cmsr. Barbara Serwin, District II Cmsr. Diane Burgis, Supervisor, District III Cmsr. Gina Swirsding, District I Cmsr. John Kincaid, District II Cmsr. Diana MaKieve, District II Cmsr. Douglas Dunn, District III Cmsr. Tasha Kamegai-Karadi, District IV Cmsr. Sam Yoshioka, District IV Members Absent: Cmsr. Leslie May, Vice-Chair, District V Cmsr. Geri Stern, District I Cmsr. Joe Metro, District V Other Attendees: Mark Goodwin, Chief of Staff for Supervisor D. Burgis, District III Dom Pruett, Field Representative for Supervisor C. Andersen, District II Christy Pierce, Public Defender’s Office Jackie Bradford, Public Participant Y’Anad Burrell, Public Participant Michael Molina, Public Participant Linda Velarde, Public Participant Erika Jenssen, Assistant to the Health Services Director Dr. Matthew White, Acting Behavioral Health Director and Medical Director, Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services (CCBHS) Robert Thigpen, CCBHS Dr. Jan Cobaleda-Kegler, Program Chief, Adult and Older Adult Services, CCBHS Steve Harris, Ph.D., Director, Planning and Evaluation, Contra Costa Health Services Warren Hayes, MH Program Chief, CCBHS David Seidner, Program Manager, Detention Mental Health Sarah Kennard, Executive Assistant to the Mental Health Commission II.Opening Comments by the Mental Health Commission Chair This is a formal, official public hearing in accordance with the California Welfare and Institutions Code. This public hearing marks the end of the public comment period for this year’s update. This event is to document that Contra Costa County has satisfied the requirements of the Welfare and Institutions Code. This public hearing structure is not designed for dialogue regarding the draft plan update; opportunities for stakeholder representative review and discussion of the draft plan update were offered during the April Mental Health Commission MHSA-Finance Committee Community Discussion and during the April meeting of the Consolidated Planning Advisory Workgroup. A copy of the powerpoint presentation provided at each of these stakeholder group discussions was provided at the public hearing, as well as copies of the F-8 draft plan update. B. Serwin asked that all public comments be kept to a three-minute time limit. III.Fiscal Years 2017 to 2020 Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan- by Warren Hayes, Mental Health Program Chief, Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services W. Hayes read into the record: “Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services is pleased to present the Draft Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for Fiscal Year 2019-20. Included for your consideration this evening are copies of the draft plan update, and copies of a summary outline of the plan. We welcome your input. The Three Year Plan Update proposes to set aside $54.7 million for fiscal year 2019-20 in order to fund over 80 programs and plan elements. The Three Year Plan Update includes $37.7 million to fund 39 programs and plan elements in the Community Services and Supports component that will serve approximately 2,000 individuals who are experiencing a serious mental illness or serious emotional disturbance. Our Prevention and Early Intervention component plans to set aside $9.2 million to fund 26 programs serving approximately 26,000 persons and are designed to prevent mental illness from becoming severe and debilitating. $2.2 million is budgeted for five Innovative Projects, and $2.7 million is set aside for programs to recruit, train, retain and support our public mental health workforce. Overall, with one exception, these component totals represent a 3% increase in the cost of doing business and are totals that were approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to the start of this current three year period. The one exception is our request to the Board to transfer $3 million dollars from our unspent fund balance to the Capital Facilities/Informat ion Technology component. These funds are to pay for construction costs for re- purposing our county owned Oak Grove facilities to house both a Short Term Residential Treatment Program and an Assertive Community Treatment Program for transition age youth. We are anticipating launching the programs in the fall of 2020, and thus the ongoing service costs will be requested in the FY 2020-2023 Three Year Plan. An inclusive Community Program Planning Process engaged stakeholders in identifying service gaps, prioritizing community public mental health needs, and suggesting strategies to meet these needs. All identified service gaps and prioritized needs from the Community Program Planning Process are referenced and addressed in the Three Year Plan Update. FY 2017-18 performance indicators for our Full Service Partnerships and our Prevention and Early Intervention programs are included in the program description, and individual program outcomes are listed by program in Appendix B. No new MHSA funded programs, or plan elements are being added for FY 2019-20. We anticipate that the plan’s proposed total budget spending authority will not need to be reduced in the foreseeable future, and that all MHSA programs and plan elements can be sustained at their proposed level of funding. As per direction of the California Department of Health Care Services the draft plan update will include our plan, as submitted last year, to spend by June 2020 funds that DHCS has identified as potentially subject to reversion back to the state. This plan will be included in our current Plan Update submittal to F-9 DHCS. Again, we welcome both Public and Commission comment and input this evening. The Draft Three Year Plan will be sent to the Board of Supervisors for review once we have included our written response to any substantive recommendations for revisions received by either the Public or the Commission.” IV.Public Comment J. Bradford noted that in reviewing the plan update document that there are a lot of redundancies in the programs and there is significant overheard in administrative costs for these 86 programs. She noted that she would like the Commission to review the programs to see if there are ways to combine programs to reduce cost and waste. J. Bradford commented that many programs did not have outcomes listed and expressed concern that the program outcomes did not have statistics or facts. Y. Burrell commented that there was a lack of public transportation accessibility for attending this public hearing and that she did not feel that information for this public hearing was widely distributed. V.Commissioner Comments G. Swirsding commented that there is a lack of psychiatry availability for MediCal and Medicare disabled and elderly persons who also have mental illness. She noted that county clinics are temporarily assisting this population. D. Dunn commented that he would Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services to expeditiously address any service gaps that result from a community based organization discontinuing contract services. B. Serwin commented that she did not see a section that addresses use of funds that would otherwise be subject to reversion. B. Serwin commented that the plan update document does a wonderful job of providing detailed explanations of the programs and the community program planning process, and she would like to see the plan update include information on the program and fiscal review process. VI.Develop a list of Comments and Recommendations to the County Mental Health Administration and to the Board of Supervisors D. Burgis moved to recommend the following for consideration by the County Mental Health Administration and the Board of Supervisors, seconded by J. Kincaid: That information regarding the program and fiscal review process be included in the Mental Health Services Act Plan Update; That information regarding clinic use for Medicare patients be expanded or included in the Mental Health Services Plan Update; That Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services and Mental Health Services Act work expeditiously to ensure all service needs identified be addressed and remain functional. VII.Adjourn Public Hearing Public Hearing was adjourned at 5:57pm F-10 Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services Administration Responses to Public Comments, Public Hearing and Mental Health Commission Comments and Recommendations As per Section 5848 of the California Welfare and Institutions Code the County shall summarize and analyze any substantive written recommendations for revisions by the public and/or the Mental Health Commission to the MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan. 30 DAY PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD No written public comments were received. PUBLIC HEARING The following comments were provided by participants in the public hearing: There are a lot of redundancies in the programs and significant administrative costs. Recommend that the Mental Health Commission review the programs to see if there are ways to combine programs to reduce cost and waste. Response. CCBHS closely monitors administrative costs via program and fiscal reviews as well as close contract monitoring of service providers. Overall, Contra Costa stays well under 15% of administrative overhead, which is significantly below industry standard. Each program has been incrementally implemented in response to stakeholder identification of service need. However, the Commission is in place to provide an independent perspective to this issue, and CCBHS welcomes any and all input as to how and where administrative cost savings can be effected and re-purposed for service provision. Many programs do not have outcomes listed, and outcomes should have statistics or facts. Response. All programs have outcomes listed as per statutory requirement. However, MHSA funded plan elements do not, as the elements are supplemental to programs that are not funded by MHSA. These outcomes are provided in other CCBHS venues. There is a lack of public transportation to this hearing, and information for the hearing was not widely distributed. Response. CCBHS welcomes feedback regarding accessibility and communication shortfalls, and we will incorporate this feedback in to next year’s planning. The public is most welcome to attend and participate. For clarification, this location was accessible by public transportation, and the event was posted on the CC BHS web site, in an accessible physical location, as well as advertised to a large listserv of stakeholders and organizations. MENTAL HEALTH COMMISSION COMMENTS Upon completion of the Public Comment period Mental Health Commission members provided individual comments. A summary of commissioner comments and Behavioral Health Services Administration (CCBHS) responses are as follows: F-11 There is a lack of psychiatry availability for MediCal/Medicare eligible persons who are elderly and dually diagnosed with health and mental health issues. Response. CCBHS serves this population but is hampered by a shortage of psychiatry availability throughout the behavioral health system. Significant prog ress has been made in the last year to recruit and retain psychiatrists, and CCBHS will continue to work on this priority via a number of strategies. This will positively affect our response to this most vulnerable population. I did not see a section that addresses use of funds that would otherwise be subject to reversion. Response. Last year at this time the Board of Supervisors approved our plan to spend funds identified for possible reversion by the Department of Health Care Services. We will include a copy of this approved plan with our submittal this year to ensure the state will not revert funds. I would like to see the Plan Update include information on the program and fiscal review process. Response. The Plan Update chapter entitled Evaluating the Plan provides information on the MHSA Program and Fiscal review process. The MHSA CPAW web page posts electronically the final reports on programs as they are evaluated. Each report is quite lengthy and would pose a significant challenge if included in the Plan Update. MENTAL HEALTH COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS The Mental Health Commission thanked all those present today for their participation in the Public Hearing of the MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for fiscal year 2019-20. This hearing fulfills the Commission’s duties under the Mental Health Services Act requirements. The Commission recommends the following for consideration: Information regarding the program and fiscal review process be included in the Mental Health Services Act Plan Update. Response. The Plan Update chapter entitled Evaluating the Plan provides information on the MHSA Program and Fiscal review process. The Commission receives the final reports on programs as they are evaluated, and the CPAW web page posts these reports for the public. Each report is quite lengthy and would pose a significant challenge if included in the Plan Update. Information regarding clinic use for Medicare patients be expanded or included in the Mental Health Services Act Plan Update. Response. All of Contra Costa Behavioral Health Services are available to individuals regardless of insurance coverage, to include Medicare. CCBHS appreciates this input as a recommendation for our entire system to be more explicit to Medicare beneficiaries that behavioral health services are available to them. CCBHS work expeditiously to ensure all MHSA funded service needs identified be addressed and remain functional. Response. This recommendation arose from an emerging report that a contract service provider was declaring bankruptcy and terminating services. CCBHS is F-12 working diligently to identify quality service providers, to include county staff, that will maintain uninterrupted behavioral health care. All stakeholders, to include the Mental Health Commission, will be kept apprised of developments, short-term solutions, and will be invited to participate in longer term planning to improve our system of care. The Behavioral Health Services Administration appreciates the support provided by the Commission to collaboratively conduct a public hearing on the draft MHSA Three Year Program and Expenditure Plan Update for fiscal year 2019-20. F-13 (This page left intentionally blank) F-14 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to issue a written notice to Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated, a non-profit corporation, to terminate Novation Contract #74-505-3, to provide mental health and support to adults with serious and persistent mental illness in Central Contra Costa County, effective at the close of business on May 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact. This Contract was funded by 38% Mental Health Services Act and 62% Federal Medi-Cal. BACKGROUND: On April 30, 2019, Anka Behavioral Health, Incorporated filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy. In early May, Anka advised the Health Services Department that it would stop providing services on close of business May 31, 2019. Approval by the Board of Supervisors will allow the Health Services Department to issue notice to the Contractor, in accordance with General Conditions, Paragraph 5. (Termination) that the Contract is terminated effective at the close of business on May 31, 2019. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Susanne Tavanno, 925-957-5212 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Marcy Wilhelm C.176 To:Board of Supervisors From:Anna Roth, Health Services Director Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Terminate Novation Contract #74-505-3 with Anka Behavioral Health Incorporated RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPT Resolution No. 5224 authorizing the Executive Director of the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa (HACCC) to submit an application to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the partial demolition and total disposition of Las Deltas and Las Deltas Annex I (the Property). BACKGROUND On May 21, 2019, the HACCC Board of Commissioners authorized staff to submit an application to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the partial demolition and total disposition of Las Deltas and Las Deltas Annex I (the Property). HUD requires a public housing authority to include a board resolution that approves of the removal application and action with the application. The application packet that was presented to the Board of Commissioners on May 21, 2019 did not include a board resolution. FISCAL IMPACT None. Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF COMMISSIONERS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: 925-957-8028 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 Joseph Villarreal, Executive Director By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C.177 To:Contra Costa County Housing Authority Board of Commissioners From:Joseph Villarreal, Housing Authority Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 5224 AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO HUD FOR THE PARTIAL DEMOLITION AND TOTAL DISPOSTITION OF LAS DELTAS AND LAS DELTAS ANNEX I CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION Should the Board of Commissioners not authorize the resolution allowing the Executive Director of the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa to submit an application to HUD for the partial demolition and total disposition of Las Deltas and Las Deltas Annex I, HACCC’s application will be incomplete and HACCC will continue to incur costs for door and window enclosures and utilities for a predominantly vacant property that will continue to attract squatters and criminal elements. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 5224 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 5224 THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA RESOLUTION NO. 5224 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PARTIAL DEMOLITION AND TOTAL DISPOSITION OF LAS DELTAS AND LAS DELTAS ANNEX I WHEREAS, the Housing Authority of the County of Contra Costa (HACCC) wants to demolish and dispose of 107 units in Properties 6 and 9A in the Las Deltas and Las Deltas Annex I (“Units”); and WHEREAS, HACCC consulted with the Resident Advisory Board on September 26, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Resident Advisory Board approved the submission of a demolition and disposition application for Las De ltas and Las Deltas Annex 1 to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and WHEREAS, on May 7, 2019, the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors expressed their support for the demolition and disposition application for Las Deltas and Las Deltas Annex 1; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the HACCC Board of Commissioners, that the y express their support of the submission by staff of a demolition and disposition application for Las Deltas and Las Deltas Annex 1 to HUD. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Executive Director is authorized and directed to submit a complete application to HUD seeking approval to demolish the 107 remaining units in Properties 6 and 9A at Las Deltas and Las Deltas Annex I . BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Ex ecutive Director is authorized to take any and all actions to effectuate the intent of this resolution. PASSED, ADOPTED AND APPROVED this 11 th day of June, 2019 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ON THE DATE SHOWN. ATTESTED ___________________________________ CLERK OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS By __________________________________________ JOSEPH VILLARREAL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RECOMMENDATION(S): 1. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Fish and Wildlife Committee to host the 19th annual Fall Forum event for law enforcement agencies to discuss fish and wildlife conservation and enforcement of fish and wildlife regulations in Contra Costa County. 2. AUTHORIZE and REQUEST the Auditor-Controller to release an amount not to exceed $2,700 from the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund for costs associated with hosting the 19th annual Fall Forum. FISCAL IMPACT: No impact to the General Fund. A portion of the fines collected from violations of fish and game regulations in the County is deposited in the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund (Fund), which as of May 13, 2019, had a current available balance of $274,771.65. State law defines how money in this fund may be spent. The Board of Supervisors is responsible for authorizing specific expenditures. The recommended expenditure is for the purpose of education and outreach on wildlife protection issues, which is consistent with the criteria for expenditures established by the State Law. Donations of items and time have also been obtained to help defray the cost of the Fall Forum. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 06/11/2019 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Diane Burgis, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Maureen Parkes (925 )674-7831 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: June 11, 2019 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C.178 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:June 11, 2019 Contra Costa County Subject:Authorization to Release Funds from the County Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund to Host the 19th Annual Fall Forum BACKGROUND: A specific component of the Fish and Wildlife Committee’s (Committee) charge is to advise the Board of Supervisors on issues related to the enforcement of regulations protecting fish and wildlife. Since 1997, the Committee has received quarterly reports with summary and detailed information on the issuance and prosecution of citations for offenses such as poaching, fishing without a license, and illegal disposals. The Committee has participated in a number of discussions with law enforcement agencies on the challenges and needs for protecting wildlife resources from illegal activities. The annual Fall Forum event has become a successful means for improving coordination of enforcement issues and providing information on the valuable fish and wildlife resources in the County. The first Forum was held in 1999. Participants have indicated these events have been helpful in providing a forum to identify opportunities for cooperatively improving the regulatory process to protect fish and wildlife. Participants see the value in the grants funded by the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund which depends on proper enforcement of regulations for wildlife protection. The Committee believes the annual Forum is a prudent use of funds that have been dedicated to protection of wildlife resources and recommends that the Forum be held again this year. Should the Board provide its authorization, the Committee intends to hold the event on Thursday, September 19, 2019 from 5:00 to 7:00 P.M. at the Martinez Sportsmen’s Club in Martinez. Invited attendees would include representatives of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sheriff’s Department, District Attorney’s Office, Superior Court, Public Defender’s Office, and the East Bay Regional Park District Police. Board of Supervisors’ participation would be most welcome. The event will be an open public meeting of the Committee subject to the Brown Act and Better Government Ordinance. Approximately 50 - 100 people have attended past Forums. Any interested individuals are welcome to attend. There is no charge to attend and enjoy the volunteer-cooked meal. Each year a guest speaker is invited to speak about the valuable natural resources in the County. This year Ryan Carrothers, Environmental Scientist, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, will provide a feature presentation regarding nutria and their potential effects on native wildlife. There will also be poster presentations provided by recipients of grants from the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund. On May 15, 2019, the Committee unanimously agreed to recommend that no more than $2,700 from the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund be used to cover any expenses that are not covered through material donations. This expenditure is consistent with Fish and Game Code Section 13103 (a), which provides that the Fish and Wildlife Propagation Fund may be spent on public education relating to the scientific principles of fish and wildlife conservation. Although the Sportsmen's Club is allowing the Committee to use their facility at no cost, there is a required $300 cleaning fee. All food preparation will be done by volunteers. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Fall Forum would not be held or would be reduced in scope to require no expenditure. ATTACHMENTS County and Non-County Sponsored Events Participation Form