Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 08022016 -CALENDAR FOR THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AGENCIES, AND AUTHORITIES GOVERNED BY THE BOARD BOARD CHAMBERS ROOM 107, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 651 PINE STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553-1229 CANDACE ANDERSEN, CHAIR, 2ND DISTRICT MARY N. PIEPHO, VICE CHAIR, 3RD DISTRICT JOHN GIOIA, 1ST DISTRICT KAREN MITCHOFF, 4TH DISTRICT FEDERAL D. GLOVER, 5TH DISTRICT DAVID J. TWA, CLERK OF THE BOARD AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR, (925) 335-1900 PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES. A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR. The Board of Supervisors respects your time, and every attempt is made to accurately estimate when an item may be heard by the Board. All times specified for items on the Board of Supervisors agenda are approximate. Items may be heard later than indicated depending on the business of the day. Your patience is appreciated. ANNOTATED AGENDA and MINUTES August 2, 2016                  9:00 A.M. Convene and announce adjournment to closed session in Room 101. Closed Session A. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS 1. Agency Negotiators: David Twa and Bruce Heid. Employee Organizations: Contra Costa County Employees’ Assn., Local No. 1; Am. Fed., State, County, & Mun. Empl., Locals 512 and 2700; Calif. Nurses Assn.; Service Empl. Int’l Union, Local1021; District Attorney’s Investigators Assn.; Deputy Sheriffs Assn.; United Prof. Firefighters, Local 1230; Physicians’ & Dentists’ Org. of Contra Costa; Western Council of Engineers; United Chief Officers Assn.; Service Empl. Int’l Union United Health Care Workers West; Contra Costa County Defenders Assn.; Probation Peace Officers Assn. of Contra Costa County; Contra Costa County Deputy District Attorneys’ Assn.; and Prof. & Tech. Engineers, Local 21, AFL-CIO; Teamsters Local 856. 2. Agency Negotiators: David Twa. Unrepresented Employees: All unrepresented employees. B. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL--EXISTING LITIGATION (Gov. Code, § 54956.9(d)(1)) Jane Pendleton v. Contra Costa County , Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. C15-018691. Pleasant Hill Recreation and Park District v. County of Contra Costa, et al., Contra Costa County Superior Court Case No. N16-0477 2. C. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS Property: 1700 and 1750 Oak Park Boulevard, Pleasant Hill Agency Negotiator: Karen Laws, Principal Real Property Agent Negotiating Parties: Contra Costa County and Pleasant Hill Recreation & Park District Under negotiation: Price and payment terms AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 1 9:30 a.m. Call to order and opening ceremonies. Inspirational Thought- "You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do." ~ Henry Ford Present: John Gioia, District I Supervisor; Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor; Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor; Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor; Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Staff Present:David Twa, County Administrator  There were no Closed Session announcements.   CONSIDER CONSENT ITEMS (Items listed as C.1 through C.83 on the following agenda) – Items are subject to removal from Consent Calendar by request of any Supervisor or on request for discussion by a member of the public. Items removed from the Consent Calendar will be considered with the Discussion Items.   DISCUSSION ITEMS   D. 1 CONSIDER Consent Items previously removed.    Consent Item C.17 was removed from the consent calendar to allow for discussion and subsequently adopted by unanimous vote.   D. 2 PUBLIC COMMENT (3 Minutes/Speaker)    Correspondence was received from Naresh Ganatra regarding the closure of Old Dougherty Road in the Gale Ranch community, San Ramon (attached). This matter will be on the Board's agenda on August 16, 2016. Sherlittia West-Miller, resident of Pittsburg, thanked the Board for work well done.   D. 3 CONSIDER waiving the 180-day "sit-out-period" for Richard Alexander, Director of Public Health Laboratory Services in the Health Services Department; and approving and authorizing the hiring of Richard Alexander as a temporary County retiree for the period August 8, 2016 through August 7, 2017. (William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 4 CONSIDER approving and authorizing the extension of the temporary employment of retiree Dr. Wendel Brunner, former Assistant Director of Health Services, effective July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 5 HEARING to consider adoption of Resolution of Necessity No. 2016/467 for acquisition by eminent domain of real property required for the Balfour Road Shoulder Widening Project, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Brentwood area. (100% Discovery Bay West Traffic Mitigation Funds) (Olivia D. Reynolds, Carmen Pina, Public Works Department)       CONTINUED to August 9, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.   D. 6 CONSIDER adopting a position on SB 1107 (Hancock, Chiu): Political Reform Act of 1974, a bill    AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 2 D. 6 CONSIDER adopting a position on SB 1107 (Hancock, Chiu): Political Reform Act of 1974, a bill that allows state and local governments to offer public campaign financing programs and limits the uses of campaign funds that are held by public officials who have been convicted of various public trust crimes. (Lara DeLaney, County Administrator's Office)       Speakers: Kathy Rai, resident of Richmond; Carol Murota, League of Women Voters of Diablo Valley (handout attached); Andrea Slater, Common Cause California; Lee Lawrence, League of Women Voters of California. Staff will draft a letter of support for the bill with language indicating the County does not forsee funding or implementing such a program in the near future.    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover NO: District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho D. 7 CONSIDER adopting report as the Board of Supervisors' response to Grand Jury Report No. 1602, entitled "Protecting Our Groundwater Resources”. (David Twa, County Administrator)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 8 CONSIDER adopting Resolution No. 2016/465, approving the side letter between Contra Costa County and Western Council of Engineers to revise Section 5.1 and Section 47.4 of the Memorandum of Understanding regarding term and wages. (David Twa, County Administrator)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 9 CONSIDER adopting Resolution No. 2016/477 approving the Memorandum of Understanding between Contra Costa County and District Attorney Investigators' Association, implementing negotiated wage agreements and other terms and conditions of employment beginning July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2019. (David Twa, County Administrator)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.10 CONSIDER adopting Resolution No. 2016/488 to provide for salary increases for specified unrepresented sworn positions to parallel those in the new District Attorney Investigators' Association Memorandum of Understanding for the period July 1, 2016 and beyond. (David Twa, County Administrator)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D.11 CONSIDER adopting Resolution No. 2016/486, approving the side letter between Contra Costa County and California Nurses Association to modify Section 7.2., Compensatory Time, of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Contra Costa County and California Nurses Association. (David Twa, County Administrator)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover D. 12 CONSIDER reports of Board members.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 3    Chair reported tonight is National Night Out. Supervisors from all districts will be attending various functions in their districts and invite all to come and meet their neighbors and local peace officers. Supervisor Mitchoff attended the July 26 meeting of the State Water Quality Control Board where she submitted a policy statement conveying Contra Costa County's concerns in regard to the Water Fix proposal (delta twin tunnels).   Closed Session   ADJOURN    Adjourned today's meeting at 11:35 a.m.   CONSENT ITEMS   Road and Transportation   C. 1 APPROVE plans for the Kirker Pass Road Crash Cushion Replacement at Nortonville Road, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Pittsburg area. (100% Local Road Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Engineering Services   C. 2 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/460 approving the second extension of the Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS00-00003, for a project being developed by Ony Homes, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (No fiscal impact)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 3 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/464 accepting completion of warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement, and release of cash deposit for faithful performance, subdivision SD-08-09245, for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (100% Developer Fees)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 4 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/470 accepting completion of improvements for road acceptance RA06-01208 for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (100% Developer Fees)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 5 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/471 approving the Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty, for road acceptance RA06-1210, for a project being developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (100% Developer Fees)    AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 4    AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 6 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/472 accepting completion of improvements for road acceptance RA06-01210 for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (100% Developer Fees)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 7 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/473 approving the Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty, for road acceptance RA12-01249 for a project being developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (100% Developer Fees)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 8 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/475 accepting completion of improvements for road acceptance RA12-01249 for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (100% Developer Fees)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Special Districts & County Airports   C. 9 ACCEPT an Access Easement from the City of Oakley to the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for property rights located off of Warhol Way and covering a portion of Assessor’s Parcel Number: 037-500-092; in connection with the Cypress Grove Development, as recommended by the Chief Engineer, Oakley area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 10 APPROVE the Notice of Intention to Convey Real Property owned by the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, identified as a former access road along the Marsh Creek Channel adjacent to Subdivision Nos. 8678, 8679 and 8680, to the City of Oakley, in connection with the Cypress Grove Development, as recommended by the Chief Engineer, Oakley area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 11 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with Stantec Architecture, Inc., effective July 1, 2016, to increase the payment limit by $100,000 to a new payment limit of $350,000, to continue providing on-call landscape architect services to complete existing projects, with no change to the original term, Countywide. (100% Special Revenue Funds)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 5 C. 12 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Director of Airports, a purchase order amendment with Ascent Aviation Group, Inc., to increase the payment limit by $125,000 to a new payment limit of $430,000 for aviation fuel, through August 31, 2016. (100% Airport Enterprise Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 13 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports, or designee, to terminate the T-Hangar and Shade Hangar Rental Agreement with Equipco Sales & Service at the Buchanan Field Airport and AUTHORIZE County Counsel to pursue legal action. (100% Airport Enterprise Fund)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Claims, Collections & Litigation   C. 14 RECEIVE report concerning the final settlement of Cecily Buda vs. Contra Costa County Fire Protection District; and AUTHORIZE payment from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund in an amount not to exceed $235,000, as recommended by the Director of Risk Management. (100% Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 15 DENY claims filed by David Chavez, Eli Dominguez, Deborah Haagensen, Mary R. Johnson DDS, Steven Ray Kitchen, Peter Korwin, Colleen Maramonte, a minor, by her father & guardian Alan Maramonte, and Denise M. Smullen.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Honors & Proclamations   C. 16 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/463 honoring the 56th Annual Contra Costa Championship Swim Meet, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Ordinances   C. 17 INTRODUCE Ordinance No. 2016-17 calling a special election for voter approval of a 30-year countywide transportation transaction and use tax estimated to generate $2.9 billion and consolidating the special election with the statewide general election on November 8, 2016, WAIVE reading, and FIX August 9, 2016 for adoption as recommended by the Director of Conservation and Development.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appointments & Resignations   AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 6 C. 18 APPOINT Jannel George-Oden of San Pablo to the Tenant seat on the Contra Costa County Housing Authority Board of Commissioners, as requested by the Housing Authority Executive Director.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 19 ACCEPT the resignation of Gordon Berke, DECLARE a vacancy in the Appointee 5 seat on the County Service Area P-5 Citizens Advisory Committee, effective August 1, 2016, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Andersen.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 20 APPROVE the new medical staff and Travis resident appointments and reappointments, additional privileges, department change request, medical staff advancement, and updated pediatrics privilege as approved by the Medical Staff Executive Committee at their June 20, 2016 meeting and as recommended by the Health Services Director.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 21 APPOINT Kathryn Ames to the Member at Large Seat #17 on the Advisory Council on Aging, as recommended by the Family and Human Services Committee.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Appropriation Adjustments   C. 22 Contingency Reserve (0990) / County Administrator (0003): APPROVE Appropriations Adjustment No. 5001 transferring appropriations in the amount of $250,000 from the County's Contingency Reserve to the County Administrator's budget to pay for legal services in connection with the County of San Joaquin, et al. v. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, et al. litigation.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Intergovernmental Relations   C. 23 ADOPT a "Support" position on AB 2121 (Gonzalez) Alcoholic Beverage Control: Beverage Service Training, a bill that requires a person who sells or serves alcoholic beverages to complete an approved Responsible Interventions for Beverage Servers Training Course within three months of employment and every three years thereafter, as recommended by the Legislation Committee. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 24 ADOPT an amendment to the County's adopted Federal Platform to include support for legislation that would create a new category of private activity bonds in the federal tax code for governments to join with private parties to help finance government buildings, as recommended by the Legislation Committee. (No fiscal impact)        AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 7  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 25 CONSIDER adopting a Support position on Proposition 56: Cigarette Tax to Fund Healthcare, Tobacco Use Prevention, Research, and Law Enforcement, an initiative which seeks to increase cigarette tax by $2 per pack, with equivalent increase on other tobacco products and electronic cigarettes containing nicotine, as recommended by the Legislation Committee. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 26 CONSIDER adopting an Support position on Proposition 67: Referendum to Overturn Ban on Single-Use Plastic Bags, which would be a position in favor of upholding or ratifying SB 270, the contested legislation banning single-use plastic bags, as recommended by the Legislation Committee. (No fiscal impact)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 27 CONSIDER adopting a Support position on Proposition 54 Legislative Proceedings Initiative, which seeks to prohibit the Legislature from passing any bill unless it has been in print and published on the Internet for at least 72 hours before the vote, except in cases of public emergency, as recommended by the Legislation Committee. (No fiscal impact)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Personnel Actions   C. 28 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21875 to add one Social Casework Assistant (represented) position and cancel one Children's Services Aide (represented) position in the Employment and Human Services Department. (42% Federal, 48% State and 10% County)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 29 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21886 to add one Clerk – Senior Level (represented) position and one Victim / Witness Assistance Program Specialist (represented) in the District Attorney's Office. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 30 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21888 to add one Mental Health Program Chief position (represented) in the Health Services Department. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 31 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21893 to add two Health Education Specialist positions (represented) in the Health Services Department. (100% Federally Qualified Health Center revenues)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 8 C. 32 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21889 to add one Public Health Program Specialist II position (represented) and cancel one Administrative Services Assistant II position (represented) in the Health Services Department. (65% Center for Disease Control funds, 35% Ryan White grant funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 33 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21890 to add one Pre-Hospital Care Coordinator position (represented) in the Health Services Department. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 34 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21891 to add 18 positions (represented) in the Health Services Department for the expansion of services to be provided at the Antioch Health Center. (100% Federally Qualified Health Center and third party revenues)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 35 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21892 to add 36 positions (represented) in the Health Services Department for the expansion of services to be provided at the Pittsburg Health Center. (100% Federally Qualified Health Center revenues)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 36 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21894 to add one Public Health Program Specialist I position (represented), and cancel one vacant part-time Community Health Worker II position (represented) and one vacant Clerk-Specialist Level (represented) in the Health Services Department. (Cost savings)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 37 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21887 to reallocate the classifications of the Pharmacist I (represented) Pharmacist II (represented), Pharmacy Technician (represented), and the Clinical/ Drug Information Coordinator (represented) positions on the Salary Schedule in the Health Services Department. (100% Enterprise Fund I)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 38 ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21895 to add 35 positions (represented) in the Health Services Department for the expansion of services to be provided at the Brentwood Health Center. (100% Federally Qualified Health Care revenues)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Grants & Contracts   APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreements between the County and the following agencies for receipt of fund and/or services:   AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 9   C. 39 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept Community Services Block Grant funding in an amount not to exceed $115,000 from the Community Services Block Grant Consortium for individualized business advice and group training to low-to-moderate income County residents for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (No County match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 40 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute an interagency agreement with Mount Diablo Unified School District, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $533,891 to provide professional school-based mental health services, crisis intervention, and day treatment services to students, for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (No County match)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 41 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept Senior Service America, Inc., grant funding in an amount not to exceed $271,704 for the Senior Community Service Employment Program for the period July 1 through December 31, 2016. (100% General Fund)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 42 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/469 authorizing the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to apply and accept the Board of State & Community Corrections, FY 2016-2018 Strengthening Law Enforcement and Community Corrections Grant in an initial amount of $600,000 for a proposed program to collaborate with non-profit organizations and community members to develop strategies for at risk neighborhoods. (80% State, 20% County In-kind match)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 43 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language with John Muir Health (dba John Muir Medical Center), Concord Campus, to act as a designated center to assist patients with a cardiac condition known as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), for the period from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2019. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 44 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language with John Muir Health Inc, (dba John Muir Health Walnut Creek Campus), to act as a designated center to assist patients with a cardiac condition known as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), for the period from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2019. (No fiscal impact)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 45 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract    AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 10 C. 45 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language with San Ramon Regional Medical Center, to act as a designated center to assist patients with a cardiac condition known as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), for the period from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2019. (No fiscal impact)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 46 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language with Kaiser Foundation Hospitals - Walnut Creek Medical Center, to act as a designated center to assist patients with a cardiac condition known as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), for the period from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2019. (No fiscal impact)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 47 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language with Sutter East Bay Hospitals (dba Sutter Delta Medical Center), to act as a designated center to assist patients with a cardiac condition known as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), for the period from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2019. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 48 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant in an amount not to exceed $30,000 from the State of California, California Arts Council, for the County to provide advocacy for the advancement of the arts for the period October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017. (50% County General Fund match; 50% In-kind)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 49 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with the Contra Costa Community College District, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $631,125 to provide educational course instruction at the Law Enforcement Training Center for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (100% Contra Costa Community College District funds)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover APPROVE and AUTHORIZE execution of agreement between the County and the following parties as noted for the purchase of equipment and/or services:   C. 50 ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/154 accepting as complete, the construction contract work performed by Roofing Constructors, Inc. (dba Western Roofing Service), for the Roof Replacement Project at 2099 Arnold Industrial Way, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Concord area. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 51 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to execute, on behalf of the Chief    AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 11 C. 51 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to execute, on behalf of the Chief Information Officer (Department of Information Technology), a purchase order with Dell Marketing, L.P., in an amount not to exceed $174,212 for the purchase of Dell servers, storage equipment and support to replace the existing aged Geographic Information System servers. (100% County General Fund)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 52 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Risk Management to execute a contract with TCS Risk Management Services in an amount not to exceed $591,000 to administer a county-wide ergonomic program and laboratory for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2019. (100% Workers' Compensation Internal Service Funds)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 53 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with First Carbon Solutions, to increase the payment limit by $24,200 to a new payment limit of $333,039 with no change to the original term of September 10, 2014 through September 9, 2018, for services required to prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the Tassajara Parks Project in the Tassajara Valley (San Ramon area). (100% Applicant fees)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 54 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Animal Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with MWI Animal Health to extend the term from September 30 through December 31, 2016 and increase the payment limit by $250,000 to a new payment limit of $700,000 to provide veterinary medical supplies. (37% User Fees, 54% City Revenue, 9% County)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 55 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Uplift Family Services, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $462,382 to provide mental health services to seriously emotionally disturbed children for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, with a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017 in an amount not to exceed $228,691. (49% Federal Financial Participation; 50% County Mental Health Realignment; 1% Mt. Diablo Unified School District)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 56 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Bay Area Community Resources, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $621,000 for Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Out-of-School Youth Services for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (100% Federal)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 57 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Interim County Probation Officer, or designee, to execute a contract with STAND! For Families Free of Violence in the amount of $107,238 to provide parenting training for participants ages 14-25 who are involved with the criminal justice system, for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (100% State)      AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 12  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 58 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Muir Orthopaedic Specialists, a Medical Group, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $225,000 to provide orthopedic services at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers, for the period August 1, 2016 through July 31, 2019. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 59 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Rainbow Community Center of Contra Costa County in an amount not to exceed $227,120 to provide Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Prevention and Early Intervention services to members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning community for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, with a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017 in an amount not to exceed $113,560. (100% MHSA)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 60 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to execute, on behalf of the Public Works Director, a purchase order amendment with Xerox Corporation, to increase the payment limit by $450,000 to a new payment limit of $829,039 for monthly equipment maintenance for the remainder of the lease, which expires on December 14, 2018, Countywide. (100% Department User Fees)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 61 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language with Young Men’s Business Association of the East Bay, in an amount not to exceed $97,000 to provide mental health and suicide prevention services to multi-cultural youth in West Contra Costa County, for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017; with a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017 in an amount not to exceed $48,500. (100% MHSA)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 62 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with Vislink, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $245,000 for the purchase of equipment, installation and support for a downlink system for the Sheriff's helicopters for the period August 1, 2016 through July 31, 2017. (100% State Grant)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 63 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Berkeley Youth Alternatives in an amount not to exceed $100,066 to provide school-based mental health services to seriously emotionally disturbed children for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, with a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017 in an amount not to exceed $50,033. (50% Federal Financial Participation; 50% County Realignment)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 13 C. 64 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with The Ratcliff Architects, effective August 2, 2016, to increase the payment limit by $400,000 to a new payment limit of $1,300,000 for as-needed architectural services, for the period of September 10, 2013 through September 10, 2018, Countywide. (100% Various Funds)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 65 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE payment of $126,881.26 to vendor California Ambulance for services rendered, less the amount owed to the State as a result of vendor’s claims for Medi-Cal reimbursement. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 66 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Risk Management to execute a contract with BSI EHS Services and Solutions in an amount not to exceed $1,202,600 to provide professional on-site environmental, health, safety and sustainability consulting support for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (43% Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund and 57% User Departments)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 67 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with the Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano, effective July 1, 2016, to increase the payment limit by $62,986 to a new payment limit of $124,809, to provide additional coordination of food and nutrition services to County residents diagnosed with HIV, with no change in the original term of March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2017. (100% Ryan White HIV Treatment Modernization Act)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 68 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Compass Group USA, Inc. (dba Bateman Community Living), in an amount not to exceed $2,704,537 to provide meal services for County’s Senior Nutrition Program for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (100% Title III C-1; Title III C-2 of the Federal Older Americans Act of 1965)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 69 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent to execute, on behalf of the Health Services Director, a purchase order with Office of the Statewide Health Planning and Development in the amount of $136,639 for the payment of the Hospital/Long Term Care Special Assessment Fee for FY 2016/2017, for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC). (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 70 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with La Clinica de la Raza in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000, to provide primary care and ophthalmology services to Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (100% CCHP Enterprise Fund II)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 14  AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 71 APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Pro Transport-1, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $225,000 to provide non-emergency patient transportation services for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers for the period June 1, 2016 through May 31, 2017. (100% Hospital Enterprise Fund I)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 72 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Desarrollo Familiar, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $365,342, to provide school based mental health services for West Contra Costa County Latino children and their families, for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017, with a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017, in an amount not to exceed $182,671. (50% Federal Financial Participation; 50% State Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 73 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language with We Care Services for Children, in an amount not to exceed $221,357 to provide State preschool services, for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 74 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract containing modified indemnification language with Richmond Elementary School, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $210,816 to provide State preschool services for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (100% State)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 75 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $200,000 to provide toxicology screening services for the period September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2018. (100% Client User fees)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover Other Actions   C. 76 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute an unpaid student training agreement with San Jose State University, to provide supervised field instruction in the County’s Public Health Division to occupational therapy students, for the period September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2021. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 77 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute an unpaid    AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 15 C. 77 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute an unpaid student training agreement with the Board of Trustees of California State University on behalf of California State University, East Bay, to provide supervised field instruction in the County’s Public Health Division, to students in health care, nursing, health science and social work, for the period August 1, 2016 through July 31, 2019. (No fiscal impact)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 78 ACCEPT the Treasurer’s Investment Policy for the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 as revised and adopted on May 17, 2016 by the Treasury Oversight Committee.        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 79 ACCEPT the Treasurer’s Quarterly Investment Report as of March 31, 2016, as recommended by the County Treasurer-Tax Collector.       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 80 APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute an unpaid student training agreement with University of Southern California, to provide supervised field instruction in the County’s Public Health Division, to physical and occupational therapist students, for the period September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2019. (No fiscal impact)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 81 SET the special tax levy for County Service Areas P-2 Zone A (Blackhawk), P-2 Zone B (Alamo) and P-5 (Round Hill) for fiscal year 2016/2017, as recommended by the Sheriff-Coroner. (100% Restricted Property Tax revenue)        AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 82 SET the special tax levy for police services Zones in County Service Area P-6 for Fiscal Year 2016-2017 as set forth in Exhibit A. (100% Restricted Property Tax revenue)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover C. 83 CONTINUE the emergency action originally taken by the Board of Supervisors on November 16, 1999 regarding the issue of homelessness in Contra Costa County, as recommended by the Health Services Director. (No fiscal impact)       AYE: District I Supervisor John Gioia, District II Supervisor Candace Andersen, District III Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District IV Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District V Supervisor Federal D. Glover   GENERAL INFORMATION AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 16 GENERAL INFORMATION The Board meets in all its capacities pursuant to Ordinance Code Section 24-2.402, including as the Housing Authority and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency. Persons who wish to address the Board should complete the form provided for that purpose and furnish a copy of any written statement to the Clerk. Any disclosable public records related to an open session item on a regular meeting agenda and distributed by the Clerk of the Board to a majority of the members of the Board of Supervisors less than 72 hours prior to that meeting are available for public inspection at 651 Pine Street, First Floor, Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553, during normal business hours. All matters listed under CONSENT ITEMS are considered by the Board to be routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless requested by a member of the Board or a member of the public prior to the time the Board votes on the motion to adopt. Persons who wish to speak on matters set for PUBLIC HEARINGS will be heard when the Chair calls for comments from those persons who are in support thereof or in opposition thereto. After persons have spoken, the hearing is closed and the matter is subject to discussion and action by the Board. Comments on matters listed on the agenda or otherwise within the purview of the Board of Supervisors can be submitted to the office of the Clerk of the Board via mail: Board of Supervisors, 651 Pine Street Room 106, Martinez, CA 94553; by fax: 925-335-1913. The County will provide reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities planning to attend Board meetings who contact the Clerk of the Board at least 24 hours before the meeting, at (925) 335-1900; TDD (925) 335-1915. An assistive listening device is available from the Clerk, Room 106. Copies of recordings of all or portions of a Board meeting may be purchased from the Clerk of the Board. Please telephone the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 335-1900, to make the necessary arrangements. Forms are available to anyone desiring to submit an inspirational thought nomination for inclusion on the Board Agenda. Forms may be obtained at the Office of the County Administrator or Office of the Clerk of the Board, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California. Applications for personal subscriptions to the weekly Board Agenda may be obtained by calling the Office of the Clerk of the Board, (925) 335-1900. The weekly agenda may also be viewed on the County’s Internet Web Page: www.co.contra-costa.ca.us STANDING COMMITTEES The Airport Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Mary N. Piepho) meets quarterly on the fourth Monday of the month at 12:30 p.m. at Director of Airports Office, 550 Sally Ride Drive, Concord. The Family and Human Services Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Federal D. Glover) meets on the first Monday of the month at 1:00 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Finance Committee (Supervisors Federal D. Glover and John Gioia) meets on the second Monday of the month at 1:30 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Federal Glover) To be determined The Internal Operations Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Karen Mitchoff) meets on the second Monday of the month at 9:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Legislation Committee (Supervisors Karen Mitchoff and Mary N. Piepho) meets on the first Thursday of the AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 17 month at 11:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Public Protection Committee (Supervisors John Gioia and Federal D. Glover) meets on the second Monday of the month at 11:00 a.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. The Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee (Supervisors Candace Andersen and Mary N. Piepho) meets on the first Thursday of the month at 1:30 p.m. in Room 101, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez. Airports Committee See above Family & Human Services Committee See above Finance Committee See above Hiring Outreach Oversight Committee See above Internal Operations Committee See above Legislation Committee See above Public Protection Committee See above Transportation, Water & Infrastructure Committee See above PERSONS WHO WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD DURING PUBLIC COMMENT OR WITH RESPECT TO AN ITEM THAT IS ON THE AGENDA, MAY BE LIMITED TO TWO (2) MINUTES A LUNCH BREAK MAY BE CALLED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE BOARD CHAIR AGENDA DEADLINE: Thursday, 12 noon, 12 days before the Tuesday Board meetings. Glossary of Acronyms, Abbreviations, and other Terms (in alphabetical order): Contra Costa County has a policy of making limited use of acronyms, abbreviations, and industry-specific language in its Board of Supervisors meetings and written materials. Following is a list of commonly used language that may appear in oral presentations and written materials associated with Board meetings: AB Assembly Bill ABAG Association of Bay Area Governments ACA Assembly Constitutional Amendment ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 AFSCME American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees AICP American Institute of Certified Planners AIDS Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ALUC Airport Land Use Commission AOD Alcohol and Other Drugs ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act of 2009 BAAQMD Bay Area Air Quality Management District BART Bay Area Rapid Transit District BayRICS Bay Area Regional Interoperable Communications System BCDC Bay Conservation & Development Commission BGO Better Government Ordinance BOS Board of Supervisors CALTRANS California Department of Transportation AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 18 CalWIN California Works Information Network CalWORKS California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids CAER Community Awareness Emergency Response CAO County Administrative Officer or Office CCCPFD (ConFire) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CCHP Contra Costa Health Plan CCTA Contra Costa Transportation Authority CCRMC Contra Costa Regional Medical Center CCWD Contra Costa Water District CDBG Community Development Block Grant CFDA Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CIO Chief Information Officer COLA Cost of living adjustment ConFire (CCCFPD) Contra Costa County Fire Protection District CPA Certified Public Accountant CPI Consumer Price Index CSA County Service Area CSAC California State Association of Counties CTC California Transportation Commission dba doing business as DSRIP Delivery System Reform Incentive Program EBMUD East Bay Municipal Utility District ECCFPD East Contra Costa Fire Protection District EIR Environmental Impact Report EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMCC Emergency Medical Care Committee EMS Emergency Medical Services EPSDT Early State Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program (Mental Health) et al. et alii (and others) FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency F&HS Family and Human Services Committee First 5 First Five Children and Families Commission (Proposition 10) FTE Full Time Equivalent FY Fiscal Year GHAD Geologic Hazard Abatement District GIS Geographic Information System HCD (State Dept of) Housing & Community Development HHS (State Dept of ) Health and Human Services HIPAA Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act HIV Human Immunodeficiency Syndrome HOV High Occupancy Vehicle HR Human Resources HUD United States Department of Housing and Urban Development IHSS In-Home Supportive Services Inc. Incorporated IOC Internal Operations Committee ISO Industrial Safety Ordinance JPA Joint (exercise of) Powers Authority or Agreement Lamorinda Lafayette-Moraga-Orinda Area LAFCo Local Agency Formation Commission LLC Limited Liability Company LLP Limited Liability Partnership Local 1 Public Employees Union Local 1 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 19 LVN Licensed Vocational Nurse MAC Municipal Advisory Council MBE Minority Business Enterprise M.D. Medical Doctor M.F.T. Marriage and Family Therapist MIS Management Information System MOE Maintenance of Effort MOU Memorandum of Understanding MTC Metropolitan Transportation Commission NACo National Association of Counties NEPA National Environmental Policy Act OB-GYN Obstetrics and Gynecology O.D. Doctor of Optometry OES-EOC Office of Emergency Services-Emergency Operations Center OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PARS Public Agencies Retirement Services PEPRA Public Employees Pension Reform Act Psy.D. Doctor of Psychology RDA Redevelopment Agency RFI Request For Information RFP Request For Proposal RFQ Request For Qualifications RN Registered Nurse SB Senate Bill SBE Small Business Enterprise SEIU Service Employees International Union SUASI Super Urban Area Security Initiative SWAT Southwest Area Transportation Committee TRANSPAC Transportation Partnership & Cooperation (Central) TRANSPLAN Transportation Planning Committee (East County) TRE or TTE Trustee TWIC Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee UASI Urban Area Security Initiative VA Department of Veterans Affairs vs. versus (against) WAN Wide Area Network WBE Women Business Enterprise WCCTAC West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 20 RECOMMENDATION(S): WAIVEthe 180-day “sit out period” for Richard Alexander, Director of Public Health Laboratory Services in the Health Services Department; and 1. FIND that the appointment of Mr. Alexander is necessary to fill a critically needed position; and2. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the hiring of County retiree Richard Alexander, as a temporary County employee for the period of August 8, 2016 to August 7, 2017. 3. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action has an annual cost of approximately $6,196 and the cost will be funded by Public Health Laboratory Testing Fees. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Arlene J. Lozada (925)957-5269 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D. 3 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Temporary Hire of County Retiree – Waiver of 180-day Sit-out Period AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 21 BACKGROUND: The Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act (CLIA) regulates laboratory testings conducted in public health laboratories. CLIA requires that a public health laboratory must have a Laboratory Director who meets specific qualifications. In 1992, the CLIA changed the requirements of a Laboratory Director’s qualifications. All Directors employed at that time were grandfathered in when more stringent qualification requirements were adopted. Richard Alexander met the qualification requirements and has been Contra Costa County’s Director of Public Health Laboratory Services since 1998. In 2008, Mr. Alexander requested to be employed on a temporary basis and has been our Director of Public Health Laboratory Services since that time. This arrangement meets CLIA standards. Richard Alexander will be retiring effective August 5, 2016 and he agreed to continue working as a temporary retiree once a month. In accordance with CLIA standards, Mr. Alexander will continue to ensure that our laboratory is meeting regulations when performing high complexity testing. Hiring back Mr. Alexander as a retiree on a temporary basis will provide the Department time to evaluate our needs, find a replacement and continue to meet CLIA requirements. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the County’s Public Health Laboratory will be out of CLIA compliance. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 22 RECOMMENDATION(S): FIND that the appointment of Dr. Wendell Brunner is necessary to fill a critically needed medical provider position in the Health Services Department; and 1. APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the extension of the temporary employment of retiree Dr. Wendell Brunner for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. 2. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action has an annual cost of approximately $21,143 and the cost is a 100% offset by third-party revenues. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Arlene J. Lozada (925)957-5269 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D. 4 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Extend Temporary Hire of County Retiree in the Health Services Department AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 23 BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting a one (1) year-extension for the temporary employment of retiree Assistant Director of Health Services Wendell Brunner. This past year, Dr. Brunner has been working with the Behavioral Health Division Director and Alcohol and Other Drug Services Director in planning for the Organized Delivery System required for the Drug Medi-Cal (DMC) Waiver. The DMC Waiver allows the Health Services Department to obtain additional State funding which will expand treatment and recovery services for individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs). He was also heavily involved in administering Quality Improvement, Quality Management and Case Management system requirements. Prior to 2014-15, Dr. Brunner did an assessment of the Behavioral Health Division in order to identify opportunities that would integrate and streamline operations to promote a Behavioral Health System of Care, also required by the State DMC Waiver. The DMC Waiver application and implementation process need to meet State timelines. Dr. Brunner’s experience and expertise in this process is critical to ensure that the County receives State funding in a timely manner. It is anticipated that in the next several months, there will be major activities in Health Services and the expanded service delivery will start. His role could be replaced by an outside consultant(s), however they would not have his knowledge of the Division, its leaders and the County’s System of Care. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, discontinuing Dr. Brunner’s temporary employment as a temporary retiree hire will prevent the Division’s ability to begin the expanded services as soon as possible. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS Cost Sheet AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 24 COST BREAKDOWN Assistant Director of Health Services 20 hours per month for 12 months = 240 hours Salary $18,962.64 (ANNUAL SALARY * POS) Employer Paid Benefits*$2,180.70 (11.5% * SALARY) One Time Costs Total Cost $21,143.34 ANNUAL TOTAL COST $21,143.34 *Includes:7.65% FICA 3.48% Workers Compensation 0.37% Unemployment OVERALL ANNUAL COST $21,143.34 Temporary Hire - County Retiree (Extension) AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 25 RECOMMENDATION(S): OPEN the public hearing and ask if any notified property owners wish to be heard as to the four items specified in Section B below, CLOSE Public Hearing. Upon completion and closing of the hearing, MAKE the findings and determinations listed under Section B below and ADOPT the attached Resolution of Necessity (No. 2016/467) to acquire the required property by eminent domain. Project No.: 0662-6R4002 [DCD-CP# 15-06] FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Discovery Bay West Traffic Mitigation Funds. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS Contact: Olivia D. Reynolds (925) 313-2306, Carmen Pina (925) 313-2012 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: D. 5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution of Necessity Hearing for the Balfour Road Shoulder Widening Project Brentwood Area. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 26 BACKGROUND: A. Proposed Project Contra Costa County is undertaking its Balfour Road Shoulder Widening Project (“Project”), to improve Balfour Road, a county road, between Sellers Avenue in the City of Brentwood and Bixler Road in the Town of Discovery Bay, in eastern Contra Costa County. This segment of Balfour Road is a narrow, approximately 3-mile long, two-lane road that has substantial traffic. This segment of roadway is used as a thoroughfare between Brentwood and Discovery Bay, and it is used as a commuter route to State Route 4. The Project will improve this segment of Balfour Road by providing standard travel lanes and shoulder widths that meet current County design standards. This segment of roadway will be widened from the current 18-to-20-foot width, to a 36-foot width. This widening will provide a 12-foot-wide travel lane, a six-foot-wide shoulder, and a two-foot-wide shoulder backing in each direction of travel on this segment of Balfour Road. The widened shoulders will provide a driver recovery area and a bike lane in each direction of travel on this segment of roadway. In addition, left-turn pockets will be added on the east and west segments of Balfour Road at the intersection of Balfour Road and Byron Highway. A left-turn pocket will be added on the western segment of Balfour Road at the intersection of Balfour Road and Bixler Road. On December 15, 2015, this Board APPROVED the Project and ADOPTED the California Environmental Quality Act Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigated Monitoring and Reporting Plan pertaining to the Project. A CEQA Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk on December 17, 2015. To complete the Project, the County must acquire various property interests from eleven (11) parcels within the Project area. The County must acquire fee title to ten (10) parcels (all partial acquisitions) and three (3) temporary construction easements. This resolution establishes the necessity of acquiring some of the property interests required for the Project. Specifically, this resolution establishes the necessity of acquiring seven (7) fee parcels and two (2) temporary construction easements in seven (7) properties, as more particularly described in Appendix “A” to the Resolution of Necessity. These property interests are required for the Project, including pre-construction utility work scheduled to begin in January 2017. The County, through the Real Estate Division of the Public Works Department, has made an offer of just compensation to the owner or owners of the property for the property interests being acquired. Each offer was based on an appraisal of the fair market value of said property interest or interests being acquired. Negotiations to acquire the property interests identified in Appendix “A” have not been successful. Construction of the overall project is scheduled to begin in the spring of 2017. In order to proceed with the Project, it is necessary for the County to exercise its power of eminent domain to acquire the property interests described herein. Pursuant to Section 1245.235 of the Code of Civil Procedure, notice was given to all persons listed on the attached Exhibit “A” whose names and addresses appear on the last equalized County Assessment Roll. This notice consisted of sending by first-class and certified mail on July 14, 2016 a Notice of Intention which notified these owners that a hearing is scheduled for August 2, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. in the Board's Chambers, at which time they may appear to be heard on the matters referred to in the notice. B. Scope of Hearing Per C.C.P. Section 1245.235 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed Project. This segment of Balfour Road between Sellers Avenue and Bixler Road is a narrow, approximately 3-mile long, two-lane road that receives substantial traffic and is used as a thoroughfare between Brentwood and Discovery Bay as well as a commuter route to State Route 4. The project includes installing left turn pockets on the east and AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 27 west legs of Balfour Road at Byron Highway and a left turn pocket on the west leg of Balfour Road at Bixler Road. A drainage system consisting of an open roadside ditch and underground pipe along the south side of Balfour Road will be installed to collect and convey roadside runoff. The Project is intended to improve this segment of roadway to meet current design standards. The project will improve traffic movement and the safety of persons who travel on this segment of roadway. 2. The Project is planned and located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury. The Project location and design are more particularly described in the CEQA Mitigated Negative Declaration that was adopted for this Project. The Project design plan will bring the shoulders up to current design standards and provide a driver recovery area and a bike lane. The project does not increase the number of travel lanes and will therefore not increase the capacity of the roadway. The majority of the roadway widening will occur along the south side of this segment of Balfour Road. The Project alignment was selected to avoid substantial impacts to East Contra Costa Irrigation District irrigation pipelines and related facilities located on the north side of this segment of Balfour Road. 3. The properties sought to be acquired are necessary for the Project. The property interests sought for this Project are necessary for the widening of Balfour Road between Sellers Avenue and Bixler Road, as planned. All efforts have been made to reduce physical and operational impacts to adjacent properties both during and after construction. The Project cannot be constructed as planned without the acquisition of these property interests. 4. The offer of compensation required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code has been made to the owner or owners of record. The County, through the Real Estate Division of the Public Works Department, has made an offer of just compensation to each owner of record for the rights required for this Project, in accordance with Government Code section 7267.2. Each offer was based on an appraisal of the fair market value of the property rights being acquired. In each case, efforts were made to acquire each required property or property right through negotiated purchase and sale instead of condemnation. Attempts to negotiate a settlement involved calls made to the property owners which were not successful, requiring the County to proceed with the adoption of this Resolution of Necessity. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County will be unable to acquire the property interests necessary for the Project. CLERK'S ADDENDUM CONTINUED to August 9, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/467 Appendix A AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 28 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/467 The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, California, by vote of four-fifths or more of its members, RESOLVES that: Pursuant to Government Code Section 25350.5 and Streets & Highways Code Section 943, Contra Costa County (County) intends to construct the Balfour Road Shoulder Widening Project (Project), in the Brentwood area of east Contra Costa County. The Project is a public improvement to Balfour Road, a county road, between Sellers Avenue in the City of Brentwood and Bixler Road in the Town of Discovery Bay, in eastern Contra Costa County. The Project will include widening this approximately three-mile-long segment of Balfour Road from its existing 18- to 20-foot pavement width, to a new pavement width of 36 feet. The Project will add a 12-foot-wide travel lane, a 6-foot wide paved shoulder/bike lane, and a 2-foot wide shoulder backing in each direction of travel on this segment of roadway. Left turn pockets will be added on the east and west segments of Balfour Road at its intersection with Byron Highway, and a left turn pocket will be added on the western segment of Balfour Road at its intersection with Bixler Road. A drainage system consisting of an open roadside ditch and underground pipe along the south side of the road will be installed to collect and convey roadside runoff. In connection with the Project, the County must acquire interests in certain real property. The property interests to be acquired consist of seven (7) separate parcels that are generally located in the Brentwood area. The property interests are more particularly described in Appendix "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. On July 14, 2016, notice of the County's intention to adopt a resolution of necessity for acquisition by eminent domain of the real property described in Appendix "A" was sent to persons whose names appear on the last equalized County Assessment Roll as owners of said property. The notice specified August 2, 2016, at 9:30 a.m., in the Board of Supervisors Chambers in the Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, as the date, time, and place for the hearing thereon. The hearing was held on that date and at that time and place, and all interested parties were given an opportunity to be heard. Based upon the evidence presented to it, this Board finds, determines, and hereby declares the following: 1. The public interest and necessity require the proposed Project; and 2. The proposed Project is planned or located in the manner that will be most compatible with the greatest public good and the least private injury; and 3. The property described herein is necessary for the proposed Project; and 4. The offer required by Section 7267.2 of the Government Code was made to the owner or owners of record. 5. Insofar as any of the property described in this resolution has heretofore been dedicated to a public use, the acquisition and use of such property by Contra Costa County for the purposes identified herein is for a more necessary public use than the use to which the property has already been appropriated, or is for a compatible public use. This determination and finding is made and this resolution is adopted pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1240.510 and 1240.610. 6. On December 15, 2015, this Board APPROVED the Project and ADOPTED the California Environmental Quality Act Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program pertaining to this Project. The CEQA Notice of Determination was filed with the County Clerk on December 17, 2015. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: The County Counsel of this County is hereby AUTHORIZED and EMPOWERED: To acquire in the County's name, by condemnation, the titles, easements and rights of way hereinafter described in and to said real property or interests therein, in accordance with the provisions for eminent domain in the Code of Civil Procedure and the Constitution of the State of California: Parcels 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 are to be acquired in fee title; Parcels 3 and 9 are to be acquired as a temporary construction easements for a period of twelve (12) months between May 1, 2017 and April 30, 2018. To prepare and prosecute in the County's name such proceed-ings in the proper court as are necessary for such acquisition; and To deposit the probable amount of compensation based on an appraisal, and to apply to said court for an order permitting the County to take immediate possession and use said real property for said public uses and purposes. PASSED and ADOPTED on , by the AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 29 following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly introduced, passed and adopted by the vote of four-fifths or more of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, California, at a meeting of said Board of Directors on the date indicated above. Date: ____________________ Contact: Olivia D. Reynolds (925) 313-2306, Carmen Pina (925) 313-2012 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: , Deputy cc: AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 30 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 31 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 32 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 33 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 34 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 35 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 36 RECOMMENDATION(S): CONSIDER adopting a position on SB 1107 (Hancock, Chiu): Political Reform Act of 1974, a bill that allows state and local governments to offer public campaign financing programs and limits the uses of campaign funds that are held by public officials who have been convicted of various public trust crimes. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact related to adopting a position on the bill. BACKGROUND: A request for support of SB 1107 was received by Supervisor Andersen's office from Northern California Common Cause. There is no policy in the Board's adopted Platform that relates to this bill, so the bill was referred to the Legislation Committee for consideration. The Committee voted to forward the issue to the Board of Supervisors for discussion with no recommendation from the Committee. SB 1107 was amended on 6/30/16 (Attachment A). The bill is pending in the Assembly Appropriations Committee. A "Fact Sheet" prepared by Common Cause is also attached (Attachment B), as is a letter of support template provided by them (Attachment C). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes:See Addendum VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO:Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: D. 6 To:Board of Supervisors From:LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:SB 1107 (Hancock, Chiu): Political Reform Act of 1974 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 37 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON ELECTIONS AND REDISTRICTING Shirley Weber, Chair SB 1107 (Allen) - As Amended Ver:March 28, 2016 SENATE VOTE: 26-12 SUBJECT: Political Reform Act of 1974: public moneys: definition. SUMMARY: Allows state and local governments to offer public campaign financing programs. Prohibits, under state law, foreign governments and foreign principals from making contributions and expenditures in connection with candidate elections. Increases the maximum monetary penalties for unlawful foreign contributions and expenditures. Limits the uses of campaign funds that are held by public officials who have been convicted of various public trust crimes. Specifically, this bill: 1) Permits state and local governmental entities to establish programs that provide for public campaign financing for candidates for elective office, if all of the following criteria have been met: a) The state or local governmental entity has established a dedicated fund for the purpose of providing public campaign financing for candidates for elective office; b) Public moneys held in the fund are available to all qualified, voluntarily participating candidates of the same office without regard to incumbency or political party preference; and, c) The state or local governmental entity has established criteria for determining a candidate's qualification by statute, ordinance, resolution, or charter. 2) Prohibits a foreign government or foreign principal, as defined, from making, directly or through any other person, a contribution, expenditure, or independent expenditure in connection with a state or local candidate. 3) Prohibits a person or a committee from soliciting or accepting a contribution from a foreign government or a foreign principal, as defined, in connection with a state or local candidate. 4) Increases the potential monetary penalties available for a violation of state law restricting contributions and expenditures by foreign governments and foreign principals as follows: a) Increases the maximum fine available in a criminal enforcement proceeding from an amount equal to the amount contributed or expended to an amount that is the greater of the following: i) $10,000; or, ii) An amount equal to the amount contributed or expended. b) Increases the maximum fine available in a civil enforcement proceeding from an amount up to $5,000 per violation to an amount that is the greater of the following: i) $10,000; or, ii) An amount equal to the amount contributed or expended. 5) Provides that an officeholder who is convicted of a felony involving accepting or giving, or offering to give, any bribe, the embezzlement of public money, extortion or theft of public money, perjury, or conspiracy to commit any of those crimes, and whose conviction has become final, may use funds held by the officeholder's candidate AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 38 controlled committee only for the payment of outstanding campaign debts or expenses and the repayment of contributions. Requires the officeholder, six months after conviction for one of the aforementioned felonies becomes final, to forfeit any remaining funds and requires the funds to be deposited in the general fund. Provides that these provisions do not apply to funds held by a ballot measure committee or in a legal defense fund. 6) Requires the Secretary of State (SOS) to submit the provisions of this bill to the voters for approval at a statewide election, as specified. 7) Contains a severability clause. 8) Makes corresponding and technical changes. EXISTING STATE LAW: 1) Creates the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC), and makes it responsible for the impartial, effective administration and implementation of the Political Reform Act (PRA). 2) Prohibits public officers from expending, and candidates from accepting, public moneys for the purpose of seeking elective office. 3) Prohibits a foreign government or foreign principal from making, directly or through any other person, a contribution, expenditure, or independent expenditure in connection with the qualification or support of, or opposition to, a state or local ballot measure. Prohibits a person or a committee from soliciting or accepting a contribution from a foreign government or a foreign principal in connection with the qualification or support of, or opposition to, any state or local ballot measure. a) Defines "foreign principal," for the purposes of these restrictions, to include the following: i) A foreign political party; ii) A person outside the United States (US), unless either of the following is established: (1) The person is an individual and a citizen of the US; or, (2) The person is not an individual, and is organized under or created by the laws of the US or of any state or other place subject to the jurisdiction of the US and has its principal place of business within the US; iii) A partnership, association, corporation, organization, or other combination of persons organized under the laws of or having its principal place of business in a foreign country; or, iv) A domestic subsidiary of a foreign corporation if the decision to contribute or expend funds is made by an officer, director, or management employee of the foreign corporation who is neither a citizen of the US nor a lawfully admitted permanent resident of the US. b) Provides that these restrictions do not prohibit a contribution, expenditure, or independent expenditure made by a lawfully admitted permanent resident. c) Provides that a person who violates these provisions is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined an amount equal to the amount contributed or expended. 4) Provides that contributions deposited into a candidate's campaign account are deemed to be held in trust for expenses associated with the election of the candidate or for expenses associated with holding office. Provides that an expenditure of campaign funds is within the lawful execution of this trust if the expenditure is reasonably related to a political, legislative or governmental purpose, as specified. Requires an expenditure that confers a substantial personal benefit on anyone with authority to approve the expenditure to be directly related to a AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 39 political, legislative, or governmental purpose. 5) Prohibits a person from being a candidate for, or being elected to, an elective office if the person has been convicted of a felony involving accepting or giving, or offering to give, any bribe, the embezzlement of public money, extortion or theft of public money, perjury, or conspiracy to commit any of those crimes. 6) Provides that a person who violates any provision of the PRA, except as specified, for which no specific civil penalty is provided, shall be liable in a civil action for an amount of up to $5,000 per violation. 7) Permits the FPPC to impose administrative penalties of up to $5,000 per violation of the PRA. 8) Requires every constitutional amendment, bond measure, or other legislative measure submitted to the people by the Legislature to appear on the ballot of the first statewide election occurring at least 131 days after the adoption of the proposal by the Legislature. EXISTING FEDERAL LAW: 1) Prohibits a foreign national, directly or indirectly, from doing either of the following in connection with a federal, state, or local election: a) Making a contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or an express or implied promise to make a contribution or donation; or, b) Making an expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement for an electioneering communication. 2) Prohibits a person from soliciting, accepting, or receiving a contribution or donation made by a foreign national in connection with a federal, state, or local election. 3) Defines "foreign national," for the purposes of the prohibitions described above, as either of the following: a) A government of a foreign country; a foreign political party; or a partnership, association, corporation, organization, or other combination of persons organized under the laws of or having its principal place of business in a foreign country; or, b) An individual who is not a citizen or a national of the US and who is not lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the US. 4) Establishes the Federal Election Commission (FEC), and makes it responsible for the administration and enforcement of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), including the restrictions on contributions and expenditures by foreign nationals described above. FISCAL EFFECT: According to the Senate Appropriations Committee analysis: 1) The FPPC indicates that it would incur first-year costs of $167,000 and ongoing annual costs of $160,000 to implement the provisions of the bill (General Fund). 2) One-time costs in the range of $414,000 to $552,000 to the SOS for printing and mailing costs to place the measure on the ballot in the next statewide election (General Fund). COMMENTS: 1) Purpose of the Bill: According to the author: In the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, local governments are increasingly reviewing their campaign finance ordinances in order to ensure the accountability of their elections. However, most AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 40 California local governments do not have the option to offer any public funding to electoral campaigns, under an existing statewide ban. Currently, six charter cities provide limited public funding to match small campaign contributions. These programs provide candidates with an alternative to relying on large campaign contributions and amplify the voices of everyday Californians who make small donations. Unfortunately, other local governments are prohibited from offering public campaign funding, due to a provision adopted nearly 30 years ago as part of Proposition 73 in 1988. While charter cities such as [Los Angeles] are exempt under the state Constitution, general law cities, counties, districts, and the state government are covered by the current state ban. In fact, after voters in Sacramento County enacted public financing, the courts struck it down under Proposition 73. SB 1107 would remove the ban on voluntary public campaign financing programs, subject to voter approval. Programs would have to meet basic criteria for fairness and accountability. SB 1107 does not create, or require any government to create, any public campaign financing program - it simply restores the option for local governments and the state. Additionally, SB 1107 includes two other commonsense provisions to increase election accountability. The bill would require elected officials, who under current law are banned from running for office due to conviction of a specified felony such as bribery, to forfeit their campaign funds within six months, after paying debts or returning contributions, other than legal defense funds. SB 1107 also would extend the current prohibition against foreign corporations or governments contributing to ballot measure campaigns to also include candidate campaigns, and would increase the maximum fine for violating that prohibition. 2) Public Financing and Proposition 73: In 1988, voters approved two separate campaign finance reform initiatives, Proposition 68 and Proposition 73. Proposition 68 proposed a system of public funding and expenditure limits for state legislative races, and passed with 53% of the vote. Proposition 73 prohibited public funding of campaigns and set contribution limits for state and local elections, and passed with 58% of the vote. The California State Supreme Court subsequently ruled in Taxpayers to Limit Campaign Spending v. FPPC (1990) 51 Cal. 3d 744, that because the two measures contained conflicting comprehensive regulatory schemes they could not be merged and only one could be implemented. As such, since Proposition 73 received more affirmative votes than Proposition 68, the Court ordered the implementation of Proposition 73 and proclaimed all provisions of Proposition 68 invalid. In 1990, all state and local elections were conducted under the provisions of Proposition 73. Many of the provisions of Proposition 73 were ultimately ruled unconstitutional by the federal courts. The only provisions of Proposition 73 to survive legal challenge were contribution limits for special elections, restrictions on certain mass mailings by officeholders, and the prohibition on the use of public money for campaign purposes. The contribution limits for special elections that were included in Proposition 73 subsequently were repealed and replaced in another ballot measure. Because of the public funding ban contained in Proposition 73, the state and most local governments in California do not have the option to offer public financing programs for electoral campaigns. While the California Supreme Court ruled that the public financing ban does not apply to charter cities (Johnson v. Bradley (1992) 4 Cal. 4th 389), a state appellate court has held that the public financing ban does apply to charter counties (County of Sacramento v. Fair Political Practices Commission (1990) 222 Cal. App. 3d 687). The California Constitution generally grants charter cities a greater degree of autonomy over local affairs than charter counties have, particularly with respect to local elections. As a result, while charter cities in California can enact public campaign financing programs, general law cities, all counties, all districts, and the state government are covered by the current ban. According to information provided by the author's office, six charter cities currently provide limited public funding to match small campaign AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 41 contributions (Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, Richmond, Sacramento, and San Francisco). 3) Previous Measures to Permit Public Financing: On three previous occasions, California voters have rejected ballot measures that would have repealed the prohibition against public funding of campaigns that was included in Proposition 73. In all three cases, however, the ballot measures also proposed to enact specific public financing programs for state elections--something that this bill does not propose. Proposition 25--an initiative measure that appeared on the March 2000 statewide primary election ballot--would have provided for public financing of campaign media advertisements and voter information packets for qualifying candidates and ballot measure committees that agreed to abide by spending limits and would have repealed the PRA's prohibition against public financing systems, among other provisions. Proposition 25 failed passage, receiving 34.7% of the vote statewide. Proposition 89--an initiative measure that appeared on the November 2006 statewide general election ballot--would have created a public financing system for candidates for elective state office, and would have repealed the PRA's prohibition against public financing systems. Proposition 89 was defeated by the voters, receiving 25.7% of the vote statewide. Proposition 15--a measure that was placed on the June 2010 statewide primary election ballot by the Legislature--would have created a public financing pilot project for candidates for SOS, and would have repealed the PRA's prohibition against public financing systems. Proposition 15 was defeated by the voters, receiving 42.7% of the vote statewide. 4) Foreign Campaign Spending, Federal Law, and Previous Legislation: As detailed above, federal law prohibits foreign nationals from making contributions in connection with federal, state, and local elections. According to information from the FEC, "[t]he ban on political contributions and expenditures by foreign nationals was first enacted in 1966 as part of the amendments to the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), an 'internal security' statute. The goal of the FARA was to minimize foreign intervention in US elections by establishing a series of limitations on foreign nationals. These included registration requirements for the agents of foreign principals and a general prohibition on political contributions by foreign nationals. In 1974, the prohibition was incorporated into [FECA], giving the [FEC] jurisdiction over its enforcement and interpretation." Until 2002, the restriction on contributions by foreign nationals specifically applied to contributions made "in connection with an election to any political office." Because that language was limited to elections for office, it was the position of the FEC that contributions from foreign nationals relating exclusively to ballot measures were not restricted by federal law. (In 2002, the restriction on foreign contributions was amended to make it applicable to any contribution made "in connection with a Federal, State, or local election," though it is unclear whether that change was intended to cover ballot measure elections.) In 1997, the Legislature approved and Governor Wilson signed SB 109 (Kopp), Chapter 67, Statutes of 1997, to prohibit foreign governments or foreign principals from making contributions, expenditures, or independent expenditures in connection with state or local ballot measures. The legislative history suggests that SB 109 did not seek to regulate foreign contributions made in connection with elections for office because such contributions were already restricted by federal law. Instead, SB 109 was limited to foreign spending in connection with ballot measure elections, thereby restricting foreign spending that was not covered by federal law. Aside from the fact that state law is limited to foreign spending made in connection with ballot measures, state and federal law differ in one other important respect. While federal law restricts contributions and expenditures by foreign nationals, state law does not restrict contributions or expenditures by a foreign national who is an individual and who is legally present in the US. The initial version of SB 109 (and an unsuccessful bill from the prior legislative session) would have restricted contributions by foreign nationals who were legally present in the US, but that restriction was amended out of the bill to address opposition arguments that the restriction could be unconstitutional. 5) Recent Enforcement Action Related to Foreign Contributions: The FPPC recently brought an enforcement AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 42 action for the first time in a case involving foreign contributions made in connection with a ballot measure. That enforcement action was initiated after the FEC considered an enforcement action of its own, and declined to take action in that case. Measure B was a Los Angeles County initiative dealing with adult film production that appeared on the ballot at the November 2012 statewide general election. In October 2012, one of the proponents of Measure B filed a complaint with the FEC alleging that the committee opposing Measure B had received contributions made by a foreign national, and further alleging that those contributions violated FECA. In August 2014, the Associate General Counsel of the FEC recommended dismissing the complaint due in part to a "lack of clear legal guidance" on whether federal law restricts contributions made by foreign nationals in connection with ballot measures. The FEC was equally divided on whether to dismiss the complaint, and in March 2015, it ultimately closed the file on the complaint without taking further action. In July 2015, after the FEC's action to close its file, the FPPC received a sworn complaint in connection with the same matter. Last December, the FPPC reached a stipulated settlement in that case. As detailed in that settlement, Manwin USA, a Delaware-based subsidiary of Manwin International, a Luxembourg-based corporation, made contributions totaling more than $268,000 to the committee opposing Measure B. In addition, Froytal, a Cyprus-based subsidiary of Manwin International, made a contribution of $75,000 to the committee opposing Measure B, although that contribution subsequently was returned by the committee. Even though Manwin USA was incorporated under Delaware-law, its contributions violated California law because it was a subsidiary of a foreign corporation and the decision to contribute funds was made by an officer of the foreign corporation who was neither a US citizen nor a lawfully admitted permanent resident of the US. The FPPC fined Manwin USA a total of $20,000 for the unlawful contributions that it made, fined Froytal $5,000 for the unlawful contribution that it made, and fined the committee opposing Measure B and its treasurer a total of $20,000 for accepting unlawful contributions made by foreign principals. The FPPC also imposed an additional $16,500 in fines for violations of reporting and disclosure laws that occurred in connection with the unlawful foreign contributions. 6) Suggested Amendments: As detailed above, this bill requires the SOS to submit its provisions to the voters for approval at a statewide election. According to the author's office, it is the author's desire for this bill to appear on the ballot at the November 2018 statewide general election. Existing law, however, requires measures submitted to the people by the Legislature to appear on the ballot of the first statewide election occurring at least 131 days after the adoption of the proposal by the Legislature. Legislative measures that are chaptered on or before June 30, 2016, will appear on the ballot at the November 8, 2016, statewide election. Any legislative measure that is chaptered during the current legislative session, but after June 30, likely will appear on the ballot at the 2018 statewide primary election, unless the measure provides otherwise. (If the Governor called a statewide special election to be held prior to the June 2018 primary election, legislative measures could also appear on the ballot at that election.) In order to ensure that this measure appears on the ballot at the November 2018 statewide general election, in accordance with the author's intent, committee staff recommends that this bill be amended to require the SOS to submit it to the voters at that election. Furthermore, in order to clarify the method by which a dedicated fund may be established for the purposes of creating a public financing program, committee staff recommends the following technical amendment: On page 3, line 8, after "purpose" insert: by statute, ordinance, resolution, or charter, 7) Related Legislation: AB 2250 (Ridley-Thomas), which is pending reconsideration on the Assembly Floor, is similar to the section of this bill that prohibits, under state law, foreign governments and foreign principals from making contributions or expenditures in connection with candidate elections. AB 2250 was approved by this committee on a 5-1 vote, but failed passage on the Assembly Floor on a 51-0 vote (54 votes were required for passage). AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 43 8) Political Reform Act of 1974: California voters passed an initiative, Proposition 9, in 1974 that created the FPPC and codified significant restrictions and prohibitions on candidates, officeholders and lobbyists. That initiative is commonly known as the PRA. Amendments to the PRA by the Legislature must further the purposes of the proposition and require a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature, or the Legislature may propose amendments to the proposition that do not further the purposes of the act by a majority vote, but such amendments must be approved by the voters to take effect. This bill would only take effect if approved by the voters. REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION: Support California Clean Money Campaign (co-sponsor) California Common Cause (co-sponsor) AARP Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action American Civil Liberties Union of California American Sustainable Business Council Asian Americans Advancing Justice--California Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law California Alliance for Retired Americans California Church IMPACT California Forward Action Fund California League of Conservation Voters California OneCare California School Employees Association, AFL-CIO CALPIRG Campaign Legal Center City and County of San Francisco Courage Campaign Franciscan Action Network League of Women Voters of California Los Angeles County Federation of Labor Lutheran Office of Public Policy--California AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 44 MapLight MOVI, Money Out Voters In National Council of Jewish Women--California Represent California Represent.Us San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District Sierra Club California Southwest Voter Registration Education Project UFCW Western States Council Voices for Progress Opposition None on file. Analysis Prepared by: Ethan Jones / E. & R. / (916) 319-2094 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Contra Costa County would not have a position on the bill. CLERK'S ADDENDUM Speakers:  Kathy Rai, resident of Richmond; Carol Murota, League of Women Voters of Diablo Valley (handout attached); Andrea Slater, Common Cause California; Lee Lawrence, League of Women Voters of California.  Staff will draft a letter of support for the bill with language indicating the County does not forsee funding or implementing such a program in the near future.  AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Bill Text Attachment B: Fact Sheet Attachment C: Letter of support template MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Correspondence: Letter from League of Women Voters AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 45 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 30, 2016 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 21, 2016 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 28, 2016 SENATE BILL No. 1107 Introduced by Senator Allen (Principal coauthor: Senator Hancock) (Principal coauthor: Assembly Member Chiu) February 17, 2016 An act to amend Sections 85300 and 85320 Section 85300 of, and to add Sections 89519.5 and 91004.5 Section 89519.5 to, the Government Code, relating to the Political Reform Act of 1974. legislative counsel’s digest SB 1107, as amended, Allen. Political Reform Act of 1974. Existing law prohibits a person who has been convicted of a felony involving bribery, embezzlement of public money, extortion or theft of public money, perjury, or conspiracy to commit any of those crimes, from being considered a candidate for, or elected to, a state or local elective office. Existing law, the Political Reform Act of 1974, provides that campaign funds under the control of a former candidate or elected officer are considered surplus campaign funds at a prescribed time, and it prohibits the use of surplus campaign funds except for specified purposes. This bill would prohibit an officeholder who is convicted of one of those enumerated felonies from using funds held by that officeholder’s candidate controlled committee for purposes other than certain purposes permitted for the use of surplus campaign funds. The bill would also require the officeholder to forfeit any remaining funds held 6 months AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 46 after the conviction became final, and it would direct those funds to be deposited in the General Fund. The Political Reform Act of 1974 prohibits a public officer from expending, and a candidate from accepting, public moneys for the purpose of seeking elective office. This bill would permit a public officer or candidate to expend or accept public moneys for the purpose of seeking elective office if the state or a local governmental entity established a dedicated fund for this purpose, as specified. The act prohibits a foreign government or principal, as defined, from making a contribution or expenditure in connection with a state or local ballot measure, and it also sets forth civil and criminal penalties for violations of the act’s provisions. This bill would expand the scope of the prohibitions relating to foreign governments and principals by also prohibiting a foreign government or principal from making a contribution in support of, or opposition to, a state or local candidate. It would also permit a greater criminal penalty to be imposed for a violation of that prohibition, and it would establish the amount of a civil penalty for a violation of the prohibition. A violation of the act’s provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the act may be amended by a statute that becomes effective upon approval of the voters. This bill would require the Secretary of State to submit the bill to the voters for approval at the November 6, 2018, statewide general election. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act’s purposes upon a 2⁄3 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act. Vote: majority 2⁄3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. 2 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 47 The people of the State of California do enact as follows: line 1 SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares all of the line 2 following: line 3 (a)  All citizens should be able to make their voices heard in the line 4 political process and hold their elected officials accountable. line 5 (b)  Elections for local or state elective office should be fair, line 6 open, and competitive. line 7 (c)  The increasing costs of political campaigns can force line 8 candidates to rely on large contributions from wealthy donors and line 9 special interests, which can give those wealthy donors and special line 10 interests disproportionate influence over governmental decisions. line 11 (d)  Such disproportionate influence can undermine the public’s line 12 trust that public officials are performing their duties in an impartial line 13 manner and that government is serving the needs and responding line 14 to the wishes of all citizens equally, without regard to their wealth. line 15 (e)  Special interests contribute more to incumbents than line 16 challengers because they seek access to elected officials, and such line 17 contributions account for a large portion of the financial line 18 incumbency advantage, as confirmed by recent studies such as line 19 those published in the Journal of Politics in 2014 and Political line 20 Research Quarterly in 2016. line 21 (f)  Citizen-funded election programs, in which qualified line 22 candidates can receive public funds for the purpose of line 23 communicating with voters rather than relying exclusively on line 24 private donors, have been enacted in six charter cities in line 25 California, as well as numerous other local and state jurisdictions. line 26 (g)  Citizen-funded election programs encourage competition line 27 by reducing the financial advantages of incumbency and making line 28 it possible for citizens from all walks of life, not only those with line 29 connections to wealthy donors or special interests, to run for office, line 30 as confirmed by recent studies such as those published in State line 31 Politics and Policy Quarterly in 2008, and by the Campaign line 32 Finance Institute in 2015 and the National Institute of Money in line 33 State Politics in 2016. line 34 (h)  By reducing reliance on wealthy donors and special interests, line 35 citizen-funded election programs inhibit improper practices, line 36 protect against corruption or the appearance of corruption, and line 37 protect the political integrity of our governmental institutions. 3 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 48 line 1 (i)  In Johnson v. Bradley (1992) 4 Cal.4th 389, the California line 2 Supreme Court commented that “it seems obvious that public line 3 money reduces rather than increases the fund raising pressures line 4 on public office seekers and thereby reduces the undue influence line 5 of special interest groups.” line 6 (j)  In Buckley v. Valeo (1976) 424 U.S. 1, the United States line 7 Supreme Court recognized that “public financing as a means of line 8 eliminating improper influence of large private contributions line 9 furthers a significant governmental interest.” line 10 (k)  In Arizona Free Enterprise v. Bennett (2011) 564 U.S. 721, line 11 the United States Supreme Court acknowledged that public line 12 financing of elections “can further ‘significant governmental line 13 interest[s]’ such as the state interest in preventing corruption,” line 14 quoting Buckley v. Valeo. line 15 (l)  In Buckley v. Valeo, the United States Supreme Court further line 16 noted that citizen-funded elections programs “facilitate and line 17 enlarge public discussion and participation in the electoral line 18 process, goals vital to a self-governing people.” line 19 (m)  The absolute prohibition on public campaign financing line 20 allows special interests to gain disproportionate influence and line 21 unfairly favors incumbents. An exception should be created to line 22 permit citizen-funded election programs so that elections may be line 23 conducted more fairly. line 24 SECTION 1. line 25 SEC. 2. Section 85300 of the Government Code is amended line 26 to read: line 27 85300. (a)  Except as provided in subdivision (b), a public line 28 officer shall not expend, and a candidate shall not accept, any line 29 public moneys for the purpose of seeking elective office. line 30 (b)  A public officer or candidate may expend or accept public line 31 moneys for the purpose of seeking elective office if the state or a line 32 local governmental entity establishes a dedicated fund for this line 33 purpose by statute, ordinance, resolution, or charter, and both of line 34 the following are true: line 35 (1)  Public moneys held in the fund are available to all qualified, line 36 voluntarily participating candidates for the same office without line 37 regard to incumbency or political party preference. line 38 (2)  The state or local governmental entity has established criteria line 39 for determining a candidate’s qualification by statute, ordinance, line 40 resolution, or charter. 4 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 49 line 1 SEC. 2. Section 85320 of the Government Code is amended line 2 to read: line 3 85320. (a)  A foreign government or foreign principal shall line 4 not make, directly or through any other person, any contribution, line 5 expenditure, or independent expenditure in connection with the line 6 qualification or support of, or opposition to, a state or local line 7 candidate or ballot measure. line 8 (b)  A person or a committee shall not solicit or accept a line 9 contribution from a foreign government or foreign principal in line 10 connection with the qualification or support of, or opposition to, line 11 a state or local candidate or ballot measure. line 12 (c)  For the purposes of this section, a “foreign principal” line 13 includes the following: line 14 (1)  A foreign political party. line 15 (2)  A person outside the United States, unless either of the line 16 following is established: line 17 (A)  The person is an individual and a citizen of the United line 18 States. line 19 (B)  The person is not an individual and is organized under or line 20 created by the laws of the United States or of any state or other line 21 place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States and has its line 22 principal place of business within the United States. line 23 (3)  A partnership, association, corporation, organization, or line 24 other combination of persons organized under the laws of or having line 25 its principal place of business in a foreign country. line 26 (4)  A domestic subsidiary of a foreign corporation if the decision line 27 to contribute or expend funds is made by an officer, director, or line 28 management employee of the foreign corporation who is neither line 29 a citizen of the United States nor a lawfully admitted permanent line 30 resident of the United States. line 31 (d)  This section does not prohibit a contribution, expenditure, line 32 or independent expenditure made by a lawfully admitted permanent line 33 resident. line 34 (e)  A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor line 35 and shall be fined the greater of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or line 36 an amount equal to the amount contributed or expended. line 37 SEC. 3. Section 89519.5 is added to the Government Code, to line 38 read: line 39 89519.5. (a)  An officeholder who is convicted of a felony line 40 enumerated in Section 20 of the Elections Code, and whose 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 50 line 1 conviction has become final, shall use funds held by the line 2 officeholder’s candidate controlled committee only for the line 3 following purposes: line 4 (1)  The payment of outstanding campaign debts or elected line 5 officer’s expenses. line 6 (2)  The repayment of contributions. line 7 (b)  Six months after the conviction becomes final, the line 8 officeholder shall forfeit any remaining funds subject to subdivision line 9 (a), and these funds shall be deposited in the General Fund. line 10 (c)  This section does not apply to funds held by a ballot measure line 11 committee or in a legal defense fund formed pursuant to Section line 12 85304. line 13 SEC. 4. Section 91004.5 is added to the Government Code, to line 14 read: line 15 91004.5. (a)  A person who intentionally violates Section 85320 line 16 is liable in a civil action brought by the civil prosecutor, for each line 17 violation, for the greater of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) or an line 18 amount equal to the amount contributed or expended. line 19 (b)  The civil prosecutor may not bring an action pursuant to this line 20 section against a person being criminally prosecuted for a violation line 21 of Section 85320 pursuant to Section 91000. line 22 (c)  This section is applicable only to violations occurring after line 23 the effective date of this section. line 24 SEC. 5. line 25 SEC. 4. The provisions of this bill are severable. If any line 26 provision of this bill or its application is held invalid, that invalidity line 27 shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given line 28 effect without the invalid provision or application. line 29 SEC. 6. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to line 30 Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because line 31 the duties imposed on a local agency or school district by this act line 32 were expressly included in a ballot measure approved by the voters line 33 in a statewide election, within the meaning of Section 17556 of line 34 the Government Code. line 35 SEC. 7. Notwithstanding Section 9040 of the Elections Code, line 36 the Secretary of State shall, pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section line 37 81012 of the Government Code, submit this act to the voters for line 38 approval at the November 6, 2018, statewide general election. line 39 SEC. 5. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to line 40 Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because 6 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 51 line 1 the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school line 2 district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or line 3 infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty line 4 for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of line 5 the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within line 6 the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California line 7 Constitution. line 8 SEC. 6. The Legislature finds and declares that this bill furthers line 9 the purposes of the Political Reform Act of 1974 within the meaning line 10 of subdivision (a) of Section 81012 of the Government Code. O 7 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 52 SB 1107: Strengthen Election Accountability Voters are increasingly concerned about the influence of money in politics. According to recent polls by the Pew Research Center and The New York Times:  84% of Americans say that money has too much influence in political campaigns today.  76% say money has a greater influence on politics and elected officials than in the past.  85% believe that we need to make fundamental changes or completely rebuild the system for funding political campaigns. SB 1107 would provide local options to strengthen election accountability SB 1107 (Allen) would restore local control over campaign finance policies. SB 1107 would permit counties, districts, general law cities, or the state to enact citizen-funded election programs, like those already in place in six charter cities. The bill would update a 28-year-old state law, which caused courts to strike down a locally-enacted county ordinance, to restore local control. SB 1107 would not create a public financing program, would not require any government to offer public financing, and would not raise any taxes or fees. It would simply permit local governments or the state the option to enact their own citizen-funded election programs, tailored to their local community. Studies of existing citizen-funded election programs have found benefits including reducing candidates’ reliance on wealthy donors and special interests, increasing the diversity of candidates and donors, encouraging greater competition, reducing the pressure for candidates to fundraise, strengthening the connections between elected officials and constituents, and fostering broader electoral participation. SB 1107 includes protections for public accountability and political fairness. The bill would ensure that any public funds may not be used to advantage any political party or to advantage challengers or incumbents. And any system would be voluntary: SB 1107 would allow local governments to decide. SB 1107 is supported by organizations including the League of Women Voters of California, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Asian Americans Advancing Justice – California, PICO California, Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, ACLU of California, and the UFCW Western States Council. As of July 5, 2016, the bill has no organizations registered in opposition. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 53 July _____, 2016 The Honorable Ben Allen State Capitol, Room 2054 Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Senate Bill 1107 – accountable elections – SUPPORT Dear Senator Allen, On behalf of _______________, I am writing with a letter of support for Senate Bill 1107, which would restore control to local governments and the state to enact new options for election campaign funding. Thank you for your leadership on this bill. In response to voters’ rising concern about money in politics, we believe that governments should act to strengthen the public’s trust. SB 1107 would restore a crucial election accountability option to local governments by removing the ban on public campaign funds. Citizen-funded election programs can amplify the voices of everyday Californians who donate small amounts, encourage more diverse participation, and give candidates an alternative to relying on large contributions. Although six charter cities offer limited public funds to match small campaign donations, current state law bans counties, districts, general law cities, and the state from enacted citizen-funded election programs. SB 1107 would remove the ban on voluntary citizen-funded election programs. SB 1107 would not enact public financing, but would simply remove the ban and permit local governments or the state, if they so choose, to create public financing programs. Voters in 1988 could have not envisioned the multi-million dollar SuperPACs that exist in 2016. It is time for the Legislature to bring our campaign finance laws into the 21st century. _______________ strongly supports SB 1107 and we urge its expeditious passage. Sincerely, _______________ AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 54 The non-partisan League of Women Voters encourages informed and active participation in governmental processes. The League never supports or opposes any political party or candidate. 500 St. Mary’s Road, #14, Lafayette, CA 94549 (925) 283-2235  www.lwvdv.org LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF DIABLO VALLEY  Alamo  Antioch  Bay Point  Bethel Island  Brentwood  Byron   Canyon  Clayton  Concord  Danville  Diablo  Discovery Bay   Knightsen  Lafayette  Martinez  Moraga  Oakley  Orinda   Pacheco  Pittsburg  Pleasant Hill  Rossmoor  San Ramon  Walnut Creek  August 1, 2016 The Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Contra Costa 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 Re: SB 1107 Dear Supervisors: Please support SB 1107 (Allen), an important bill to reduce the influence of money in California elections. This bill will restore local control by allowing our state and local governments to adopt voluntary citizen-funded election programs like those in place in six charter cities. A long-standing ban on public financing currently prohibits innovative approaches to campaign funding that can revive participation and encourage trust in government. SB 1107 would modify that ban but does not establish any campaign financing program or spend any money. It simply opens the door to local governments that want to consider new approaches like small-donor matching funds or voucher programs that voters around the country have enacted. Any program would have to treat candidates and parties equitably. The League of Women Voters has long worked to promote maximum citizen participation in the political process and combat public cynicism about government. SB 1107 will create flexibility for local governments to explore public financing options that increase voter participation, restore public trust, and strengthen our representative democracy. Please join us in taking action to support this valuable bill! Please vote YES to support the resolution on SB 1107. Sincerely, Carol Murota Vice-President League of Women Voters of Diablo Valley AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 55 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT report as the Board of Supervisors' response to Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1602, entitled "Protecting Our Groundwater Resources”. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The 2015/16 Civil Grand Jury filed the above-referenced report attached, on May 10, 2016, which was reviewed by the Board of Supervisors and subsequently referred to the County Administrator and Assessor, who prepared the attached response that clearly specifies: Whether the finding or recommendation is accepted or will be implemented;A. If a recommendation is accepted, a statement as to who will be responsible for implementation and a definite target date; B. A delineation of the constraints if a recommendation is accepted but cannot be implemented within a six-month period; and C. The reason for not accepting or adopting a finding or recommendation.D. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea (925) 335-1077 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: D. 7 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:RESPONSE TO CIVIL GRAND JURY REPORT NO. 1602, ENTITLED "PROTECTING OUR GROUNDWATER RESOURCES" AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 56 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > FINDINGS F1. With the exception of Community and non-Community wells, the County is not required to provide oversight of individually owned wells; aside from permitting well construction and inspecting wells upon completion. Response: The respondent disagrees partially with the finding. The Contra Costa County Health Services Department-Environmental Health Division (EHD) has the authority to oversee the construction and destruction of water wells in the county. EHD also plays an on-going monitoring role for water wells that are part of a small water system in the county. Small water systems (community and non-community water systems) include a water system that serves two to 199 service connections. EHD does not play an on-going role for water wells that are part of medium or large water systems in the county. Those with more than 199 service connections are regulated by the State. Additionally, as a result of enactment of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) within the applicable groundwater basins, a Groundwater Sustainability Agency (GSA), via adoption of a Groundwater Sustainability Plan (GSP), could have oversight on individual wells that use more than 2-acre feet annually in groundwater basins designated as medium or high priority by the State. GSPs are required to be adopted prior to January 31, 2022. F2. Improperly maintained wells or wells that are located too close to surface contaminants or failing septic systems risk contamination, which also may lead to the contamination of neighboring wells. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. F3. Improperly abandoned wells or undocumented wells can threaten groundwater quality because improper construction or maintenance may result in breaches in these wells that permit ground contaminants to reach potable water in lower water bearing strata. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Note, however, that most areas of the county do not contain surface contamination. The finding would be appropriate in the industrial or former industrial areas of the county. Note also that as a part of any industrial contamination investigation, a well survey is conducted and any wells that are identified are properly abandoned. F4. The lack of a comprehensive and readily accessible County database of wells hinders the ability to track wells to assure they are either properly maintained or correctly abandoned. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Laws currently exist that define abandoned wells and require their destruction. When such wells are identified, the EHD pursues corrective action/compliance. County Ordinance Code also requires that inactive wells that are to be used again be protected and marked. Beyond the requirements described in state law and County ordinance, the County has no role in actively monitoring the status of water wells. Based on the response to F3, the need to pursue such a monitoring program is not needed. F5. EHD and the County Assessor can access DWR well log data, water district backflow preventer installation records, and related historical data that tie well locations to specific property parcels. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. The County Assessor and EHD can access Department of Water Resources (DWR) well log data and related historical data that are made available to the County either by manually sorting through paper records or by accessing electronic data as allowed by the DWR and, likewise, water district backflow preventer installation records and related historical data as allowed by the water district. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 57 F6. Residents of the County who live in disadvantaged communities are more likely to have their sole potable water source come from domestic wells, which have fewer checks on water quality than municipal water sources derived from surface water. County Flood Control and EHD have the data to assess those most at risk. With this information they would be able to develop projects eligible for Proposition 1 matching grants, i.e., projects that could enhance water quality and reduce risk of well contamination during flood conditions. Response: The respondent disagrees with the finding. Most of the small water systems in the county depend on groundwater, and several of those would be included in the State description of a disadvantaged community (DAC). However, most of the small water system customers would not qualify, as they do not meet the definition of a DAC. Further, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report, most of the DACs, are in areas served by municipal water. Contra Costa Flood Control does not have data to identify who is most at risk. Flood Control's clean water programs gather data on stream water quality, but not ground water quality. Also, wells should not be impacted during flood conditions, as they must conform to very strict standards to prevent surface water intrusion. F7. A “Groundwater Advisory Council” may coordinate stakeholders to help achieve the water-related goals and policies articulated in the County General Plan, as well as raise public awareness about groundwater issues in the County. Response: The respondent disagrees partially with the finding. Creation of an effective advisory council would be challenging given the inherent differences in water quantity and quality throughout the various parts of the county, and, thus, no unifying goals. The creation of groundwater agencies for those basins designated by DWR as high or medium priority is underway and is the best approach at this time. Additionally, the SGMA already requires that any interested party may participate in the development of the GSP. In fact, the GSA shall encourage the active involvement of diverse social, cultural, and economic elements of the population within the groundwater basin prior to and during the development and implementation of the groundwater sustainability plan, see Section 10727.8 (a) of the SGMA. F8. There is insufficient data to confirm either a maximum sustainable withdrawal rate or storage capacity for any of the groundwater basins within the County. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. The SGMA requires the development of a water budget that will require the GSA/GSP to identify existing groundwater use, and provides tools to sustainably manage groundwater resources. F9. The County can choose to support the formation of GSAs for “low” and “very low” risk basins, even though not required by the SGMA. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. The SGMA requires that by January 31, 2022, all basins designated as high or medium priority by the DWR shall be managed under a groundwater sustainability plan (managed by a GSA), see Section 10720.7(b) of the SGMA. With respect to low and very low priority basins, the legislature merely authorizes and encourages them to be managed under a groundwater sustainability plan. Contra Costa County has three medium priority basins for which there is a need to form a GSA and subsequent GSP. However, it was misreported in Grand Jury Report #1602 that the remaining basins in the County are designated “low” priority by DWR. The remaining basins within the County are designated as “very low” priority. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 58 F10. GSAs can be helpful in elucidating how much available groundwater exists within a defined basin; how much water can be sustainably withdrawn on an annual basis or during an emergency and in helping stakeholders reach agreement about who is entitled to withdraw from a groundwater basin. Response: The respondent disagrees partially with the finding. The GSA, through the development and adoption of the GSP and subject to the requirements of DWR, should identify 1) the existing amount of groundwater being used within a particular basin, 2) what actions are required to avoid undesirable results, and 3) other actions to sustainably manage groundwater resources. How much available groundwater exists may remain unknown until such time as there are basin specific data/records that may show extremes in capacity of the basin over time. F11. Three GSA agencies are in the early stages of formation: one for the East Bay Plain, one that incorporates the “thumb” of the Livermore Valley Basin, and one for the Tracy Sub-Basin. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. Additionally, to clarify, there has not been a GSA established in the county. Various local agencies (e.g. cities, counties and water districts) that overlie the East Bay Plain basin, the Livermore Valley basin, and the Tracy basin are meeting to determine whether there is support to develop and participate in the creation of a GSA. F12. Approximately $100 million has been allocated by Proposition 1 (2014) to support GSAs in developing sustainability plans. Response: The respondent agrees with the finding. F13. Based on historical records and more recent hydrological studies, the City could access more groundwater for landscape watering and emergency purposes. Response: No response is required of the County. F14. To help establish the Pittsburg Plain basin’s sustainable yield and storage capacity, the City of Pittsburg could initiate formation of a GSA for this basin. Response: No response is required of the County. RECOMMENDATIONS R1. As funds are identified or become available, the Board of Supervisors should consider directing EHD to update their website alerting domestic well owners about the risks of not periodically checking the water quality of their potable water wells, and preparing an informational brochure containing the same cautionary information. Response: The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. EHD will make water quality information directed at private well owners available on its website. The primary focus of the website will be to direct the interested web visitor to the State Water Resources Control Board website, which has links to Fact Sheets on groundwater and private domestic well-testing. Staff can make these handouts available in hard copy upon request. R2. As funds are identified or become available, the Board of Supervisors should consider directing appropriate County departments to review the well records and databases of DWR, water districts, and the County to document well locations, develop a countywide database, and map the locations as an overlay on the County GIS. Response: The recommendation has not yet been implemented, but will be implemented in the future. For several years now, EHD has collected geographical positioning system (GPS) information for new construction of water wells. EHD is pursuing having a student intern assist with obtaining GPS information AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 59 for historical water wells. R3. As funds are identified or become available, the County Assessor should consider verifying that the assessed value of each parcel reflects the presence or absence of wells by reviewing assembled well data and, where discrepancies between records are identified, confirming whether a well exists and its status, active or abandoned. Response: The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or reasonable. The Assessor does not need to verify or review the assessed value of each parcel or to determine well status. Pursuant to Proposition 13, every water well in the State as well as Contra Costa County was valued and included on the assessment roll with a 1975 base. Modifications to the base value triggered by actions such as new construction, removals, and changes in ownership include the value of wells in their current condition. Drilling, abandoning or removing a water well requires an EHD permit. EHD notifies the Assessor, which triggers a new assessment and new base year value reflecting the changed status of the water well. Collecting, assembling, reviewing, and confirming data from many agencies would be labor intensive. Matching paper to paper and then making a field visit for verification would add to the extreme cost of this idea, making it cost prohibitive. R4. As funds are identified or become available, the Board of Supervisors should consider directing EHD and the County Flood Control District to jointly review proposed flood control projects to determine how to design or modify the projects to protect local wells, and the groundwater below, in DACs. Response: The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted. Currently, EHD comments on any proposed project in the county and would thus do so also for any flood control project during its development. EHD reviews the project from many different environmental perspectives and water protection can be included in that without any additional direction from the Board. Further, the current standards for wells protect the ground water for all communities and do not need to be modified. R5. The Board of Supervisors should consider establishing a Groundwater Advisory Council to further promote public awareness about groundwater conservation and protection. Response: The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted. No special council is needed at this time because 1) the groundwater basins in the county are not designated as critically over-drafted and 2) there will be a public process through the adoption of the GSP for medium priority basins located within the County. Since groundwater resources, usage and constraints vary dramatically across the county, basin-specific approaches to pubic engagement appear more appropriate at this time. R6. The Board of Supervisors should consider directing the County Water Agency to become involved in the formation of GSAs in the County and to periodically report to the Board on the status of each GSA. Response: The recommendation requires further analysis. Currently the Water Agency is participating, on behalf of the County, in meetings that may establish the County as a member in the Tracy subbasin. The Water Agency provided a report to the Board of Supervisors in April 2016, at which time the Board of Supervisors declared its intent to become a member of a GSA for the portion of the Tracy subbasin within Contra Costa County and to sustainably manage groundwater resources within the County in compliance with the SGMA, as recommended by the Transportation, Water and Infrastructure Committee. Formation of the GSA is required prior to June 2017. There are many unanswered questions the County and local districts must examine over the next year, in AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 60 coordination with DWR and other local agencies beyond the county line, to determine how best to manage the basins that require a GSA/GSP. It should be noted that the County continues to seek adequate funding and staff to participate in the management of the three medium priority basins. It is conceivable that a new funding source for the County’s possible participation in future GSA/GSPs may be identified. At present, the County's involvement in implementing SGMA is being provided by the Water Agency through a single staff person who already manages a full-time program. R7. The Board of Supervisors should encourage each water district whose sphere of Influence overlays “low” and “very low” priority groundwater basin in the County to form a GSA to analyze its groundwater basin and determine its potential for expansion and exploitation. Response: The recommendation will not be implemented because it is not warranted or reasonable. While the intent of the Grand Jury may provide an opportunity to explore the use of underutilized groundwater storage (if it exists) within the “very low” priority groundwater basins in the county, it is not advisable for the Board of Supervisors to support development of GSA/GSP at this time as there are too many unknowns. Managing county groundwater resources is a new shared responsibility for the County. Three GSA/GSPs are required to be established within the county based on their designated priority. The County is participating in the establishment of GSA/GSPs for the three basins to better understand the unknowns, and recognize and learn from potential mistakes prior to encouraging water districts to go through what appears to be a lengthy and costly process. Additionally, in June 2016, the DWR released new regulations that specify the required components for all groundwater sustainability plans. For the County and the local districts, a considerable amount of data will need to be developed for the required GSPs within the medium priority basins. A GSP must include a Hydrologic Conceptual Model, groundwater conditions, water budget, management areas, minimum thresholds, measurable objectives and monitoring network in order for a GSP to be accepted by the State. This is not a complete list of the requirements. At this time, the overall costs and staff required to participate in the establishment of the Tracy subbasin GSA/GSP are not known because the governance structure of the GSA is incomplete and will not be required until June 2017. R8. As funds are identified or become available, the City should consider consulting hydrological specialists to provide advice about the best locations for accessing groundwater for landscape irrigation and emergency purposes. Response: No response is required of the County. R9. As funds are identified or become available, the City of Pittsburg should consider forming a GSA for the “low priority” Pittsburg Plain groundwater basin in order to establish its practical sustainable yield and maximum storage capacity. Response: No response is required of the County. ATTACHMENTS Civil Grand Jury Report No. 1602 "Protecting Our Groundwater Resources" AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 61 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES62 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES63 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES64 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES65 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES66 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES67 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES68 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES69 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES70 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES71 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES72 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES73 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES74 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES75 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES76 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES77 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES78 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES79 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES80 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES81 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES82 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES83 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES84 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES85 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/465, approving the side letter between Contra Costa County and Western Council of Engineers to add Section 5.1.A.6 through 5.1.A.8, General Wages and replace Section 47.4, Duration of Agreement, of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Contra Costa County and Western Council of Engineers. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost of the contract extension is $30,800 for FY 2016/17 for the additional 1% wage increase for eleven months, $134,360 for FY 2017/18 ($33,600 for the full year of 1% and $100,760 for 3%) , and $235,120 for FY 2018/19 ($33,600 for the full year of 1%,and $100,760 for 3% in 2017/18 and 2018/19). BACKGROUND: The County and Western Council of Engineers agree to add Section 5.1.A.6 through 5.1.A.8, General Wages and replace Section 47.4, Duration of Agreement, of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Contra Costa County and Western Council of Engineers: Effective August 1, 2016, increase the base rate of pay for all classifications represented by the Union by an additional one percent (1%), members received a three percent wage increase on July 1, 2016; a. Effective July 1, 2017, the base rate of pay for all classifications represented by the Union will be increased by three percent (3%); b. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Harjit S. Nahal, Assistant County Auditor, Lisa Lopez, Assistant Director of Human Resources D. 8 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution No. 2016/465 Western Council of Engineers Side Letter - Extension of Agreement and Wages AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 86 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > Effective July 1, 2018, the base rate of pay for all classifications represented by the Union will be increased by three percent (3%); c. and Extend the existing contract term from June 30, 2017 to June 30, 2019.d. The terms of the Side Letter will be incorporated into the next MOU between the County and Western Council of Engineers. Except as specifically amended or excluded by the Side Letter, all other terms and conditions of the MOU between Contra Costa County and Western Council of Engineers (July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2017) remain unchanged. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Contract will expire June 30, 2017. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/465 WCE Side Letter dated 7/14/16 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/465 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 87 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/465 In The Matter Of: Approving the Side Letter between Contra Costa County and Western Council of Engineers to amend the MOU by revising section 5.1.A - General Wages and section 47.4 - Duration of Agreement. The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors acting in its capacity as Governing Board of the County of Contra Costa and all districts of which it is the ex-officio governing Board RESOLVES THAT: Effective following approval of the Board of Supervisors, the attached Side Letter of Agreement dated July 14, 2016, between Contra Costa County and Western Council of Engineers be ADOPTED. Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Harjit S. Nahal, Assistant County Auditor, Lisa Lopez, Assistant Director of Human Resources 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 88 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES89 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES90 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/477 approving the Memorandum of Understanding between Contra Costa County and District Attorney Investigators' Association, implementing negotiated wage agreements and other terms and conditions of employment beginning July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: The terms and conditions set forth in this action have an estimated FY 2016/17 cost of $228,000; FY 2017/18 cost of $433,000; and FY 2018/19 cost of $639,000. BACKGROUND: The District Attorney Investigators' Association (DAIA) reached a Tentative Agreement with the County on July 19, 2016 and ratified the agreement on the same day. The resulting Memorandum of Understanding, which is attached, includes modifications to wages and benefits. In summary, those changes are: Duration of Agreement - Section 42.4 The term of the agreements is from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2019. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Lisa Lopez, Assistant Director of Human Resources, Harjit S. Nahal, Assistant County Auditor D. 9 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Memoranda of Understanding with District Attorney Investigators' Association AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 91 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > General Wages - Section 5.1 Effective August 1, 2016, the base rate of pay will be increased by five percent (5.0%). Permanent full-time employees, employed by the County in a classification represented by the DAIA on August 1, 2016, will be paid a lump sum payment of four hundred and thirty-five dollars ($435). Effective July 1, 2017, the base rate of pay will be increased by four and one-half percent (4.5%). Effective July 1, 2018, the base rate of pay will be increased by four and one-half percent (4.5%). Definitions Removes definition of Temporary Employment. Association Representatives – Section 4.2 Increases the number of Union representatives permitted to attend meetings regarding matters within the scope of representation, from two (2) to three (3). Overtime – Section 7.1 Deletes language that applies to temporary employees. Health, Life & Dental Care – Section 16 Section retitled “Medical Dental, and Life Insurance. Deletes provisions regarding prior health plan contribution and County premium subsidy. Deletes information regarding County’s prior dental plan premium subsidy Updates provision regarding family members’ eligibility for listed dental plan subsidies. Deletes provision regarding vision care. Adds language regarding health benefit coverage for employees not otherwise covered. County Dental Plan Premium Subsidy on and after January 1, 2014 – Section 16.5 Life Insurance Contributions – Section 16.9 Removes references to provisional employment. Grievance Procedure – Section 22.1 Removes references to “Human Resources Director” and replaces with “Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee.” Provisional Appointment – Section 27 Deletes section regarding provisional appointments. Permanent-Intermittent Employee Benefits – Section 35 Removes reference to CalPERS health plan regulations. Provisional Employee Benefits – Section 36 Deletes section regarding provisional employee benefits. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County and DAIA will not have an agreement on a successor MOU. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/477 DAIA MOU 7/1/16 - 6/30/19 MINUTES ATTACHMENTSAUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 92 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/477 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 93 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/477 In The Matter Of: Memorandum of Understanding with District Attorney Investigators' Association, for the period of July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2019 The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors acting in its capacity as the Governing Board of the County of Contra Costa, RESOLVES THAT: The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Contra Costa County and District Attorney Investigators' Association, providing for wages, benefits and other terms and conditions of employment for the period beginning July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2019, for those classifications represented by the District Attorney Investigators' Association is ADOPTED. A copy of the MOU is attached. Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Lisa Lopez, Assistant Director of Human Resources, Harjit S. Nahal, Assistant County Auditor 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 94 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES95 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY INVESTIGATORS’ ASSOCIATION JULY 1, 2016 – JUNE 30, 2019 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 96 DISTRICT ATTORNEY INVESTIGATORS’ ASSOCIATION TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 ASSOCIATION RECOGNITION ........................................................... 4 SECTION 2 ASSOCIATION SECURITY 2.1 Dues Deduction ..................................................................................... 4 2.2 Dues Authorization Form ....................................................................... 4 2.3 Maintenance of Membership ................................................................. 5 2.4 Withdrawal of Membership .................................................................... 5 2.5 Communicating with Employees ............................................................ 5 2.6 Use of County Buildings ........................................................................ 6 2.7 Advance Notice ..................................................................................... 6 2.8 Assignment of Classes to Bargaining Units ........................................... 6 SECTION 3 NO DISCRIMINATION .......................................................................... 7 SECTION 4 OFFICIAL REPRESENTATITVES 4.1 Attendance at Meetings ......................................................................... 7 4.2 Association Representatives ................................................................. 8 4.3 Release Time for Training ..................................................................... 8 SECTION 5 SALARIES 5.1 General Wages ..................................................................................... 8 5.2 Entrance Salary ..................................................................................... 9 5.3 Anniversary Dates ................................................................................. 9 5.4 Increments Within Range .................................................................... 10 5.5 Part-Time Compensation..................................................................... 10 5.6 Compensation for Portion of Month ..................................................... 10 5.7 Position Reclassification ...................................................................... 11 5.8 Salary Reallocation & Salary on Reallocation ...................................... 11 5.9 Salary on Promotion ............................................................................ 12 5.10 Salary on Involuntary Demotion........................................................... 12 5.11 Salary on Voluntary Demotion ............................................................. 12 5.12 Transfer ............................................................................................... 12 5.13 Pay for Work in Higher Classification .................................................. 13 5.14 Payment .............................................................................................. 14 SECTION 6 DAYS AND HOURS OF WORK 6.1 Definitions ........................................................................................... 14 6.2 Time Reporting and Pay Practices Waiver .......................................... 14 6.3 Time Reporting/Time Stamping ........................................................... 14 SECTION 7 OVERTIME AND COMPENSATORY TIME 7.1 Overtime ............................................................................................. 15 7.2 Straight Time ....................................................................................... 15 7.3 Overtime and Straight Time Compensatory Time ................................ 15 7.4 Court Appearance Overtime ................................................................ 17 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 97 SECTION 8 CELL PHONES ................................................................................... 17 SECTION 9 ON-CALL/CALL BACK ...................................................................... 17 SECTION 10 SENIORITY, WORKFORCE REDUCTION, LAYOFF & REASSIGNMENT 10.1 Workforce Reduction ........................................................................... 17 10.2 Separation Through Layoff .................................................................. 18 10.3 Notice .................................................................................................. 21 10.4 Special Employment Lists ................................................................... 21 10.5 Reassignment of Laid Off Employees.................................................. 22 SECTION 11 HOLIDAYS 11.1 Holidays Observed .............................................................................. 22 11.2 Holidays Observed – Full-Time Employees ......................................... 22 11.3 Holidays Observed – Part-Time Employees ........................................ 23 11.4 Holiday is WORKED and Holiday Falls on Regularly Scheduled Work Day (for EE’s on A Regular Work Schedule, the holiday always falls on the EE’s regularly scheduled work day) ....................... 23 11.5 Automated Time Keeping .................................................................... 23 SECTION 12 VACATION LEAVE 12.1 Vacation Allowance ............................................................................. 23 12.2 Vacation Accrual Rates ....................................................................... 23 12.3 Accrual During Leave Without Pay ...................................................... 24 12.4 Vacation Allowance for Separated Employees .................................... 24 12.5 Accrual on Prorated Basis ................................................................... 24 12.6 Vacation Leave on Reemployment from a Layoff List .......................... 24 SECTION 13 SICK LEAVE 13.1 Purpose of Sick Leave ........................................................................ 25 13.2 Credits to and Charges Against Sick Leave ........................................ 25 13.3 Policies Governing the Use of Paid Sick Leave ................................... 25 13.4 Administration of Sick Leave ............................................................... 27 13.5 Disability .............................................................................................. 28 13.6 Workers’ Compensation ...................................................................... 30 13.7 Integration of SDI ................................................................................ 31 13.8 Accrual During Leave Without Pay ...................................................... 31 SECTION 14 LEAVE OF ABSENCE 14.1 Leave Without Pay .............................................................................. 32 14.2 General Administration – Leaves of Absence ...................................... 32 14.3 Family Care or Medical Leave (FMLA) ................................................ 32 14.4 Pregnancy Disability Leave ................................................................. 35 14.5 Group Health Plan Coverage .............................................................. 35 14.6 Leave Without Pay – Use of Accruals.................................................. 35 14.7 Military Leave ...................................................................................... 36 14.8 Return from Leave of Absence ............................................................ 36 14.9 Appeal of Denial .................................................................................. 37 14.10 Salary Review While on Leave of Absence ......................................... 37 14.11 Unauthorized Absence ........................................................................ 37 14.12 Furlough Days Without Pay ................................................................. 37 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 98 SECTION 15 JURY DUTY AND WITNESS DUTY 15.1 Jury Duty ............................................................................................. 37 15.2 Witness Duty ....................................................................................... 38 SECTION 16 MEDICAL, DENTAL, AND LIFE INSURANCE 16.1 Health Plan ......................................................................................... 39 16.2 Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) ...................................................... 39 16.3 CalPERS Health Plan Monthly Premium Subsidy ................................ 39 16.4 Dental Plan ......................................................................................... 40 16.5 County Dental Plan Premium Subsidy on and After January 1, 2016 .. 40 16.6 Orthodontia Coverage ......................................................................... 41 16.7 Rate Information .................................................................................. 41 16.8 Life Insurance Benefit Under Health and Dental Plans ........................ 42 16.9 Life Insurance Contributions ................................................................ 42 16.10 Premium Payments ............................................................................. 42 16.11 Extended Coverage ............................................................................. 42 16.12 Retirement Coverage .......................................................................... 42 16.13 Dual Coverage .................................................................................... 43 16.14 Health Care Spending Account ........................................................... 43 16.15 PERS Long Term Care ....................................................................... 43 16.16 Dependent Care Assistance Program ................................................. 44 16.17 Premium Conversion Plan ................................................................... 44 16.18 Health Benefit Coverage for Employees Not Otherwise Covered ........ 44 16.19 Prevailing Section ............................................................................... 44 SECTION 17 PROBATIONARY PERIOD 17.1 Duration .............................................................................................. 44 17.2 Probation Periods Over Six Months ..................................................... 44 17.3 Revised Probationary Period ............................................................... 44 17.4 Length of Probationary Period ............................................................. 44 17.5 Rejection During Probation .................................................................. 45 17.6 Regular Appointment ........................................................................... 45 17.7 Layoff During Probation ....................................................................... 46 17.8 Rejection During Probation of Laid off Employee ................................ 46 SECTION 18 PROMOTION 18.1 Competitive Exam ............................................................................... 47 18.2 Promotion Policy ................................................................................. 47 18.3 Open Exam ......................................................................................... 47 18.4 Promotion Via Reclassification Without Examination ........................... 47 18.5 Requirements for Promotional Standing .............................................. 47 18.6 Seniority Credits .................................................................................. 47 18.7 Physical Examination .......................................................................... 48 SECTION 19 TRANSFER 19.1 Conditions ........................................................................................... 48 19.2 Procedure ........................................................................................... 48 SECTION 20 RESIGNATIONS 20.1 Resignation in Good Standing ............................................................. 49 20.2 Constructive Resignation..................................................................... 49 20.3 Effective Resignation ........................................................................... 49 20.4 Revocation .......................................................................................... 49 20.5 Coerced Resignations ......................................................................... 49 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 99 SECTION 21 DISMISSAL, SUSPENSION, DEMOTION, TEMPORARY REDUCTION IN PAY & REDUCTION WITHIN CLASS 21.1 Cause for Action .................................................................................. 50 21.2 Skelly Requirements – Notice of Proposed Action (Skelly Notice) ....... 51 21.3 Employee Response ........................................................................... 51 21.4 Leave Pending Employee Response ................................................... 51 21.5 Suspensions Without Pay.................................................................... 51 21.6 Procedure on Dismissal, Suspension, Reduction Within Class, Temporary Reduction In Pay, or Disciplinary Demotion ....................... 52 SECTION 22 GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 22.1 Definition ............................................................................................. 52 22.2 Time Limits .......................................................................................... 53 22.3 Notice .................................................................................................. 53 22.4 Compensation Complaints .................................................................. 54 22.5 Strike/Work Stoppage ......................................................................... 54 22.6 Merit Board ......................................................................................... 54 22.7 Filing by Association ............................................................................ 54 SECTION 23 RETIREMENT 23.1 Payment of Employee Contributions ................................................... 54 23.2 Safety Employees Retirement – Tier A – Employees Hired or Re-Hired Before January 1, 2013 .................................................... 54 23.3 Thirty (30) Year Employees ................................................................. 55 23.4 Safety Employees Retirement – Sworn Employees who Become New Members of CCCERA on or after January 1, 2013 ........ 55 23.5 Re-opener – Election of Safety PEPRA Tier by Employees Hired On or Before December 31, 2012 .............................................. 55 SECTION 24 SAFETY .............................................................................................. 56 SECTION 25 MILEAGE ............................................................................................ 56 SECTION 26 PAY WARRANT ERRORS ................................................................. 56 SECTION 27 PERSONNEL FILES ........................................................................... 56 SECTION 28 SERVICE AWARDS ........................................................................... 57 SECTION 29 REIMBURSEMENT FOR MEAL EXPENSES ..................................... 57 SECTION 30 COMPENSATION FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO PERSONAL PROPERTY .............................................................. 58 SECTION 31 UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE .............................................................. 59 SECTION 32 LENGTH OF SERVICE DEFINITION (for service Awards and vacation accruals) .................................... 59 SECTION 33 PERMANENT PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFITS .......................... 59 SECTION 34 PERMANENT-INTERMITTENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS ................... 59 SECTION 35 PROFESSIONAL REIMBURSEMENT ................................................ 59 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 100 SECTION 36 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ........................................................................ 60 SECTION 37 DEPENDENT CARE ........................................................................... 60 SECTION 38 BILINGUAL PAY ................................................................................ 60 SECTION 39 ADOPTION ......................................................................................... 61 SECTION 40 SCOPE OF AGREEMENT & SEPARABILITY OF PROVISION 40.1 Scope of Agreement ............................................................................ 61 40.2 Separability of Provisions .................................................................... 61 40.3 Personnel Management Regulations ................................................... 61 40.4 Duration of Agreement ........................................................................ 62 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 101 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND DISTRICT ATTORNEY INVESTIGATORS’ ASSOCIATION This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is entered into pursuant to the authority contained in Board of Supervisors Resolution 81/1165 and has been jointly prepared by the parties. The Employee Relations Officer (County Administrator) is the representative of Contra Costa County in employer-employee relations matters as provided in Board of Supervisors Resolution 81/1165, Section 34-8.012. The parties have met and conferred in good faith regarding wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment for the employees in units in which the Association is the recognized representative, have freely exchanged information, opinions and proposals and have endeavored to reach agreement on all matters relating to the employment conditions and employer-employee relations covering such employees. This MOU shall be presented to the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, as the governing board of the County and appropriate fire districts, as the joint recommendations of the undersigned for salary and employee benefit adjustments for the period set forth herein. Special provisions and restrictions pertaining to Project employees covered by this MOU are contained in Attachment B which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 102 DEFINITIONS Appointing Authority: Department Head unless otherwise provided by statute or ordinance. Association: District Attorney Investigators' Association. Class: A group of positions sufficiently similar with respect to the duties and responsibilities that similar selection procedures and qualifications may apply and that the same descriptive title may be used to designate each position allocated to the group. Class Title: The designation given to a class, to each position allocated to the class, and to the employees allocated to the class. County: Contra Costa County. Demotion: The change of a permanent employee to another position in a class allocated to a salary range for which the top step is lower than the top step of the class which the employee formerly occupied except as provided for under "Transfer" or as otherwise provided for in this MOU, in the Personnel Management Regulations, or in specific resolutions governing deep classifications. Director of Human Resources: The person designated by the County Administrator to serve as the Assistant County Administrator-Director of Human Resources. Eligible: Any person whose name is on an employment or reemployment or layoff list for a given classification. Employee: A person who is an incumbent of a position or who is on leave of absence in accordance with provisions of this MOU and whose position is held pending his/her return. Employment List: A list of persons who have been found qualified for employment in a specific class. Layoff List: A list of persons who have occupied positions allocated to a class in the Merit System and who have been involuntarily separated by layoff, displacement, or demoted by displacement, or have voluntarily demoted in lieu of layoff or displacement, or have transferred in lieu of layoff or displacement. Permanent-Intermittent Position: Any position which requires the services of an incumbent for an indefinite period but on an intermittent basis, as needed, paid on an hourly basis. Permanent Part-Time Position: Any position which will require the services of an incumbent for an indefinite period but on a regularly scheduled less than full time basis. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 103 Permanent Position: Any position which has required, or which will require the services of an incumbent without interruption, for an indefinite period. Project Employee: An employee who is engaged in a time limited program or service by reason of limited or restricted funding. Such positions are typically funded from outside sources but may be funded from County revenues. Promotion: The change of a permanent employee to another position in a class allocated to a salary range for which the top step is higher than the top step of the class which the employee formerly occupied, except as provided for under "Transfer" or as otherwise provided for in this MOU, in the Personnel Management Regulations, or in specific resolutions governing deep classes. Position: The assigned duties and responsibilities calling for the regular full time, part- time or intermittent employment of a person. Reallocation: The act of reassigning an individual position from one class to another class at the same range of the salary schedule or to a class which is allocated to another range that is within five (5%) percent of the top step, except as otherwise provided for in the Personnel Management Regulations, deep class resolutions or other ordinances. Reclassification: The act of changing the allocation of a position by raising it to a higher class or reducing it to a lower class on the basis of significant changes in the kind, difficulty or responsibility of duties performed in such position. Reemployment List: A list of persons, who have occupied positions allocated to any class in the merit system and, who have voluntarily separated and are qualified for consideration for reappointment under the Personnel Management Regulations governing reemployment. Resignation: The voluntary termination of permanent service with the County from a position in the merit system. Transfer: The change of an employee who has permanent status in a position to another position in the same class in a different department, or to another position in a class which is allocated to a range on the salary plan that is within five percent (5%) at top step as the class previously occupied by the employee. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 104 SECTION 1 - ASSOCIATION RECOGNITION The Association is the formally recognized employee organization for the District Attorney Investigators' Unit, and such organization has been certified as such pursuant to Chapter 34-12 of Board Resolution 81/1165. SECTION 2 - ASSOCIATION SECURITY 2.1 Dues Deduction. Pursuant to Chapter 34-26 of Resolution 81/1165 only a majority representative may have dues deduction and as such the Association has the exclusive privilege of dues deduction for all members in its unit. Dues deduction shall be based on the voluntary written authorization of the employee which shall remain in effect so long as the employee remains in a unit represented by the Association unless such authorization is canceled in writing by the employee in accordance with the provisions set forth in Section 2.4. The dues deduction shall be for a specified amount and uniform between members of the Association. The Association shall indemnify, defend, and hold the County harmless against any claims made and against any suit instituted against the County on account of dues deduction. The Association shall refund to the County any amounts paid to it in error upon presentation of supporting evidence. 2.2 Dues Authorization Form. Employees hired in classifications assigned to units represented by the Association shall as a condition of employment at the time of employment complete an Association dues authorization form provided by the Association and shall have deducted from their paychecks the membership dues of the Association. Said employees shall have thirty (30) days from the date of hire to decide if he/she does not want to become a member of the Association. Such decision not to become a member of the Association must be made in writing to the Auditor-Controller with a copy to the Employee Relations Division within said thirty (30) day period. If the employee decides not to become a member of the Association any Association dues previously deducted from the employee's paycheck shall be returned to the employee and said amount shall be deducted from the next dues deduction check sent to the Association. If the employee does not notify the County in writing of the decision not to become a member within the thirty (30) day period, he/she shall be deemed to have voluntarily agreed to pay the dues of the Association. The dues authorization form referenced above shall include a statement that the Association and the County have entered into a MOU, that the employee is required to authorize payroll deductions of Association dues as a condition of employment, and that such authorization may be revoked within the first thirty (30) days of employment upon proper written notice by the employee within said thirty (30) day period as set forth above. Each such employee shall, upon written completion of the authorization form, receive a copy of said authorization form which shall be deemed proper notice of his/her right to revoke said authorization. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 105 2.3 Maintenance of Membership. All employees in the unit represented by the Association who are currently paying dues to the Association and all employees in such unit who hereafter become members of the Association shall as a condition of continued employment pay dues to the Association for the duration of this MOU and each year thereafter so long as the Association continues to represent the classification to which the employee is assigned, unless the employee has exercised the option to cease paying dues in accordance with Section 2.4. 2.4 Withdrawal of Membership. By notifying the Auditor-Controller's Department in writing, between May 1, and May 31, any employee may withdraw from Association membership and discontinue paying dues as of the payroll period commencing July 1, discontinuance of dues payments to then be reflected in the August 10, paycheck. The above withdrawal of membership can only occur in the last year of any given MOU. Immediately upon the close of the above mentioned thirty (30) day period the Auditor- Controller shall submit to the Association a list of the employees who have rescinded their authorization for dues deduction. 2.5 Communicating With Employees. The Association shall be allowed to use designated portions of bulletin boards or display areas in public portions of County buildings or in public portions of offices in which there are employees represented by the Association, provided the communications displayed have to do with official organization business such as times and places of meetings and further provided that the Association appropriately posts and removes the information. The Department Head reserves the right to remove objectionable materials after notification to and discussion with the Association. Representatives of the Association, not on County time, shall be permitted to place a supply of employee literature at specific locations in County buildings if arranged through the Employee Relations Officer; said representatives may distribute employee organization literature in work areas (except work areas not open to the public) if the nature of the literature and the proposed method of distribution are compatible with the work environment and work in progress. Such placement and/or distribution shall not be performed by on duty employees. The Association shall be allowed access to work locations in which it represents employees for the following purposes: a. to post literature on bulletin boards; b. to arrange for use of a meeting room; c. to leave and/or distribute a supply of literature as indicated above; d. to represent an employee on a grievance, and/or to contact an Association officer on a matter within the scope of representation. In the application of this provision, it is agreed and understood that in each such instance advance arrangements including disclosure of which of the above purposes is AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 106 the reason for the visit, will be made with the departmental representative in charge of the work area, and the visit will not interfere with County services. 2.6 Use of County Buildings. The Association shall be allowed the use of areas normally used for meeting purposes for meetings of County employees during non-work hours when: a. Such space is available and its use by the Association is scheduled twenty-four (24) hours in advance; b. There is no additional cost to the County; c. It does not interfere with normal County operations; d. Employees in attendance are not on duty and are not scheduled for duty; e. The meetings are on matters within the scope of representation. The administrative official responsible for the space shall establish and maintain scheduling of such uses. The Association shall maintain proper order at the meeting, and see that the space is left in a clean and orderly condition. The use of County equipment (other than items normally used in the conduct of business meetings, such as desks, chairs, ashtrays, and blackboards) is prohibited, even though it may be present in the meeting area. 2.7 Advance Notice. The Association shall, except in cases of emergency, have the right to reasonable notice of any ordinance, rule, resolution or regulation directly relating to matters within the scope of representation proposed to be adopted by the Board, or boards and commissions designated by the Board, and to meet with the body considering the matter. The listing of an item on a public agenda, or the mailing of a copy of a proposal at least seventy-two (72) hours before the item will be heard, or the delivery of a copy of the proposal at least twenty-four (24) hours before the item will be heard, shall constitute notice. In cases of emergency when the Board, or boards and commissions designated by the Board, determines it must act immediately without such notice or meeting, it shall give notice and opportunity to meet as soon as practical after its action. 2.8 Assignment of Classes to Bargaining Units. The County shall assign new classes in accordance with the following procedure: a. Initial Determination. When a new class title is established, the Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee shall review the composition of existing representation units to determine the appropriateness of including some or all of the employees in the new class in one or more existing representation units, and AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 107 within a reasonable period of time shall notify all recognized employee organizations of his/her determination. b. Final Determination. The Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee’s determination is final unless within ten (10) days after notification a recognized employee organization requests in writing to meet and confer thereon. c. Meet and Confer and Other Steps. The Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee shall meet and confer with such requesting organizations (and with other recognized employee organizations where appropriate) to seek agreement on this matter within sixty (60) days after the ten (10) day period in Subsection B, unless otherwise mutually agreed. Thereafter, the procedures in cases of agreement and disagreement, arbitration referral and expenses, and criteria for determination shall conform to those in Subsections (d) through (I) of Section 34- 12.008 of Board of Supervisors' Resolution 81/1165. SECTION 3 - NO DISCRIMINATION There shall be no discrimination because of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation or Association activities against any employee or applicant for employment by the County or by anyone employed by the County; and to the extent prohibited by applicable State and Federal law there shall be no discrimination because of age. There shall be no discrimination against any disabled person solely because of such disability unless that disability prevents the person from meeting the minimum standards established for a position or from carrying out the duties of the position safely. SECTION 4 – OFFICIAL REPRESENTATIVES 4.1 Attendance at Meetings. Employees designated as official representatives of the Association shall be allowed to attend meetings held by County agencies during regular working hours on County time as follows: a. If their attendance is required by the County at a specific meeting; b. if their attendance is sought by a hearing body or presentation of testimony or other reasons; c. if their attendance is required for meeting(s) scheduled at reasonable times agreeable to all parties required for settlement of grievances filed pursuant to Section 22 - Grievance Procedure of this MOU; d. if they are designated as a grievance representative in which case they may utilize a reasonable time at each level of the proceedings to assist an employee to present a grievance, provided the meetings are scheduled at reasonable times agreeable to all parties; AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 108 e. if they are designated as spokesperson or representative of the Association and as such make representations or presentations at meetings or hearings on wages, salaries and working conditions; f. in each case advance arrangements for time away from the employee's work station or assignment are made with the appropriate Department Head or his/her designee, and the County agency calling the meeting is responsible for determining that the attendance of the particular employee(s) is required. The number of such representatives shall not exceed two (2) without prior approval of the department and the Employee Relations Manager. 4.2 Association Representatives. Official representatives of the District Attorney Investigators' Association shall be allowed time off on County time for meetings during regular working hours when formally meeting and conferring in good faith or consulting with the Employee Relations Officer or other management representatives on matters within the scope of representation, provided that the number of such representatives shall not exceed three (3) without prior approval of the department and the Employee Relations Manager, and that advance arrangements for the time away from the work station or assignment are made with the appropriate Department Head or his/her designee. 4.3 Release Time for Training. The County shall provide the Association a maximum of eight (8) total hours per year of release time for Association designated officers to attend Association sponsored training programs. Requests for release time shall be provided in writing to the Department and County Human Resources Department at least fifteen (15) days in advance of the time requested. The Department Head will reasonably consider each request and notify the affected employee whether such request is approved, within one (1) week of receipt. SECTION 5 - SALARIES 5.1 General Wages. The base rate of pay for all classifications represented by the District Attorney Investigators’ Association will be increased as follows: A. Effective August 1, 2016 or the first day of the month following ratification, whichever is later 5% wage increase B. Permanent full-time employees, employed by the County in a classification represented by the DAIA on August 1, 2016, will be paid a lump sum payment of four hundred and thirty-five dollars ($435) on September 9, 2016. C. Effective July 1, 2017 4.5% wage increase D. Effective July 1, 2018 4.5% wage increase AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 109 E. The time between steps in the salary ranges will be as follows: 6 months between Step 1 and Step 2; 12 months between each of steps 2 through step 7 and 19 months between step 7 and step 8. F. Longevity Differential. Permanent, full-time employees who have completed twenty (20) years of Contra Costa County service are eligible to receive a two percent (2%) longevity differential effective on the first day of the month following the month in which the employee qualifies for the twenty (20) year service award. For those employees who completed twenty (20) years of service on or before April 1, 2012, this longevity differential will be paid prospectively only from April 1, 2012. 5.2 Entrance Salary. New employees shall generally be appointed at the minimum step of the salary range established for the particular class of position to which the appointment is made. However, the appointing authority may fill a particular position at a step above the minimum of the range. 5.3 Anniversary Dates. Except as may otherwise be provided for in deep class resolutions, anniversary dates will be set as follows: a. New Employees. The anniversary date of a new employee is the first day of the calendar month after the calendar month when the employee successfully completes six (6) months service provided however, if an employee began work on the first regularly scheduled workday of the month the anniversary date is the first day of the calendar month when the employee successfully completes six (6) months service. b. Promotions. The anniversary date of a promoted employee is determined as for a new employee in subsection 5.3.a above. c. Demotions. The anniversary date of a demoted employee is the first day of the calendar month after the calendar month when the demotion was effective. d. Transfers, Reallocations and Reclassifications. The anniversary date of an employee who is transferred to another position or one whose position has been reallocated or reclassified to a class allocated to the same salary range or to a salary range which is within five percent (5%) of the top step of the previous classification, remains unchanged. e. Reemployments. The anniversary of an employee appointed from a reemployment list to the first step of the applicable salary range and not required to serve a probation period is determined in the same way as the anniversary date is determined for a new employee who is appointed the same date, classification and step and who then successfully completes the required probationary period. f. Notwithstanding other provisions of this Section 5, the anniversary of an employee who is appointed to a classified position from outside the County's AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 110 merit system at a rate above the minimum salary for the employee's new class, or who is transferred from another governmental entity to this County's merit system, is one (1) year from the first day of the calendar month after the calendar month when the employee was appointed or transferred; provided however, when the appointment or transfer is effective on the employee's first regularly scheduled work day of that month, his/her anniversary is one (1) year after the first calendar day of that month. g. The anniversary date of employees on leave from their County position with or without pay, for more than three (3) months shall be extended by the appointing authority for a period of time equal to the length of time on leave. This new date shall become the employee's new anniversary date for purposes of future salary reviews. 5.4 Increments Within Range. The performance of each employee, except those of employees already at the maximum salary step of the appropriate salary range, shall be reviewed on the anniversary date as set forth in Section 5.3 – Anniversary Dates to determine whether the salary of the employee shall be advanced to the next higher step in the salary range. Advancement shall be granted on the affirmative recommendation of the appointing authority, based on satisfactory performance by the employee. The appointing authority may recommend unconditional denial of the increment or denial subject to one additional review at some specified date before the next anniversary which must be set at the time the original report is returned. Except as herein provided, increments within range shall not be granted more frequently than once a year, nor shall more than one (1) step within-range increment be granted at one time, except as otherwise provided in deep-class resolutions. In case an appointing authority recommends denial of the within range increment on some particular anniversary date, but recommends a special salary review at some date before the next anniversary the special salary review shall not affect the regular salary review on the next anniversary date. Nothing herein shall be construed to make the granting of increments mandatory on the County. If the department verifies in writing that an administrative or clerical error was made in failing to submit the documents needed to advance an employee to the next salary step on the first of the month when eligible, said advancement shall be made retroactive to the first of the month when eligible. 5.5 Part-Time Compensation. A part-time employee shall be paid a monthly salary in the same ratio to the full time monthly rate to which the employee would be entitled as a full time employee under the provisions of this Section 5 as the number of hours per week in the employee's part-time work schedule bears to the number of hours in the full time work schedule of the department. 5.6 Compensation for Portion of Month. Any employee who works less than any full calendar month, except when on earned vacation or authorized sick leave, shall receive as compensation for services an amount which is in the same ratio to the established monthly rate as the number of days worked is to the actual working days in such employee's normal work schedule for the particular month; but if the employment is intermittent, compensation shall be on an hourly basis. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 111 5.7 Position Reclassification. An employee who is an incumbent of a position which is reclassified to a class which is allocated to the same range of the basic salary schedule as is the class of the position before it was reclassified, shall be paid at the same step of the range as the employee received under the previous classification. An incumbent of a position which is reclassified to a class which is allocated to a lower range of the basic salary schedule shall continue to receive the same salary as before the reclassification, but if such salary is greater than the maximum of the range of the class to which the position has been reclassified, the salary of the incumbent shall be reduced to the maximum salary for the new classification. The salary of an incumbent of a position which is reclassified to a class which is allocated to a range of the basic salary schedule greater than the range of the class of the position before it was reclassified shall be governed by the provisions of Section 5.9 - Salary on Promotion. 5.8 Salary Reallocation & Salary on Reallocation. a. In a general salary increase or decrease, an employee in a class which is allocated to a salary range above or below that to which it was previously allocated, when the number of steps remain the same, shall be compensated at the same step in the new salary range the employee was receiving in the range to which the class was previously allocated. If the reallocation is from one salary range with more steps to a range with fewer steps or vice versa, the employee shall be compensated at the step on the new range which is in the same percentage ratio to the top step of the new range as was the salary received before reallocation to the top step of the old range, but in no case shall any employee be compensated at less than the first step of the range to which the class is allocated. b. In the event that a classification is reallocated from a salary range with more steps to a salary range with fewer steps on the salary schedule, apart from the general salary increase or decrease described in 5.8.A above, each incumbent of a position in the reallocated class shall be placed upon the step of the new range which equals the rate of pay received before the reallocation. In the event that the steps in the new range do not contain the same rates as the old range, each incumbent shall be placed at the step of the new range which is next above the salary rate received in the old range, or if the new range does not contain a higher step, at the step which is next lower than the salary received in the old range. c. In the event an employee is in a position which is reallocated to a different class which is allocated to a salary range the same as above or below the salary range of the employee's previous class, the incumbent shall be placed at the step in the new class which equals the rate of pay received before reallocation. In the event that the steps in the range for the new class do not contain the same rates as the range for the old class, the incumbent shall be placed at the step of the new range which is next above the salary rate received in the old range; or if the new range does not contain a higher step, the incumbent shall be placed at the step which is next lower than the salary received in the old range. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 112 d. In the event of reallocation to a deep class, the provisions of the deep class resolution and incumbent salary allocations, if any, shall supersede this Section 5.8. 5.9 Salary on Promotion. Any employee who is appointed to a position of a class allocated to a higher salary range than the class previously occupied, except as provided under Section 5.12 – Transfer shall receive the salary in the new salary range which is next higher than the rate received before promotion. In the event this increase is less than five percent (5%), the employee's salary shall be adjusted to the step in the new range which is at least five percent (5%) greater than the next higher step; provided however that the next step shall not exceed the maximum salary for the higher class. In the event of the appointment of a laid off employee from the layoff list to the class from which the employee was laid off, the employee shall be appointed at the step which the employee had formerly attained in the higher class unless such step results in a decrease, in which case the employee is appointed to the next higher step. If however, the employee is being promoted into a class allocated to a higher salary range than the class from which the employee was laid off, the salary on promotion will be calculated from the highest step the employee achieved prior to layoff. 5.10 Salary on Involuntary Demotion. Any employee who is demoted, except as provided under Section 5.12 - Transfer, shall have his/her salary reduced to the monthly salary step in the range for the class of position to which he has been demoted next lower than the salary received before demotion. In the event this decrease is less than five percent (5%), the employee's salary shall be adjusted to the step in the new range which is five percent (5%) less than the next lower step; provided, however, that the next step shall not be less than the minimum salary for the lower class. Whenever the demotion is the result of layoff, cancellation of positions or displacement by another employee with greater seniority rights, the salary of the demoted employee shall be that step on the salary range which he/she would have achieved had he/she been continuously in the position to which he/she has been demoted, all within-range increments having been granted. 5.11 Salary on Voluntary Demotion. Whenever any employee voluntarily demotes to a position in a class having a salary schedule lower than that of the class from which he/she demotes, his/her salary shall remain the same if the steps in his/her new (demoted) salary range permit, and if not, the new salary shall be set at the step next below former salary. 5.12 Transfer. An employee who is transferred from one position to another as described under "Transfer" shall be placed at the step in the salary range of the new class which equals the rate of pay received before the transfer. In the event that the steps in the range for the new class do not contain the same rates as the range for the old class, the employee shall be placed at the step of the new range which is next above the salary rate received in the old range; or if the new range does not contain a higher step, the employee shall be placed at the step which is next lower than the salary received in the old range. If the transfer is to a deep class, the provisions of the deep class resolution on salary of transfers, if any, shall apply in lieu of the above provisions. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 113 5.13 Pay for Work in Higher Classification. When an employee in a permanent position in the merit system is required to work in a classification for which the compensation is greater than that to which the employee is regularly assigned, the employee shall receive compensation for such work at the rate of pay established for the higher classification pursuant to Section 5.9 - Salary on Promotion of this MOU, commencing on the thirty-first (31st) work day of the assignment, under the following conditions: 1. The employee is assigned to a program, service, or activity established by the Board of Supervisors which is reflected in an authorized position which has been classified and assigned to the Salary Schedule. 2. The nature of the departmental assignment is such that the employee in the lower classification becomes fully responsible for the duties of the position of the higher classification. 3. Employee selected for the assignment will normally be expected to meet the minimum qualifications for the higher classification. 4. Pay for work in a higher classification shall not be utilized as a substitute for regular promotional procedures provided in this Memorandum. 5. The appropriate authorization form has been submitted by the Department Head and approved by the County Administrator. 6. Higher pay assignments shall not exceed six (6) months except through reauthorization. 7. If approval is granted for pay for work in a higher classification and the assignment is terminated and later reapproved for the same employee within thirty (30) days no additional waiting period will be required. 8. Any incentives (e.g., the education incentive) and special differentials (e.g., bilingual differential) accruing to the employee in his/her permanent position shall continue, unless the employee is no longer performing the duties which warrant the differentials. 9. During the period of work for higher pay in a higher classification, an employee will retain his/her permanent classification, and anniversary and salary review dates will be determined by time in that classification. 10. Allowable overtime pay, shift differentials and/or work location differentials will be paid on the basis of the rate of pay for the higher class. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 114 5.14 Payment. On the tenth (10th) day of each month, the Auditor will draw a warrant upon the Treasurer in favor of each employee for the amount of salary due the employee for the preceding month; provided, however, that each employee (except those paid on an hourly rate) may choose to receive an advance on the employee's monthly salary, in which case the Auditor shall, on the twenty-fifth (25th) day of each month, draw his/her warrant upon the Treasurer in favor of such employee. The advance shall be in an amount equal to one-third (1/3) or less (at the option of the employee) of the employee's basic salary of the previous month except that it shall not exceed the amount of the previous month's basic salary less all requested or required deductions. The election to receive an advance shall be made on the prescribed form (form M-208, revised 5/81) and submitted by the fifteenth (15th) of the month to the department payroll clerk who will forward the card with the "Salary Advance Transmittal/Deviation Report" to the Auditor-Controller payroll section. Each election shall become effective on the first day of the month following the deadline for filing the notice and shall remain effective until revoked. In the case of an election made pursuant to this Section 5.14 all required or requested deductions from salary shall be taken from the second installment, which is payable on the tenth (10th) day of the following month. SECTION 6 - DAYS AND HOURS OF WORK 6.1 Definitions. A. Regular Work Schedule: A regular work schedule is eight (8) hours per day, Monday through Friday, inclusive, for a total of forty (40) hours per week. B. Workweek for Employees on Regular Work Schedule: For employees on a regular work schedule, the workweek begins at 12:01 a.m. on Monday and ends at 12 midnight on Sunday. 6.2 Time Reporting and Pay Practices Waiver. The Association agrees to the implementation of an Automated Timekeeping System. The Association waives its right to meet and confer regarding any impacts that may result from the County’s implementation of the automated timekeeping system, including but not limited to, changes to current departmental time reporting and pay practices. The Association agrees to convert from the current payroll cycle when the County is able to upgrade the current Payroll system or implement a new County Payroll System. 6.3 Time Reporting/Time Stamping. Hourly employees must timestamp in and out as they begin their work shifts, finish their work shifts, and take meal periods. In circumstances where time stamping in and out is not feasible, hourly employees must record their time in the electronic timecard. Salaried employees will report time off and time worked for special pays on the electronic timecard. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 115 SECTION 7 - OVERTIME AND COMPENSATORY TIME 7.1 Overtime. Permanent full-time and part-time employees are eligible to receive overtime pay or overtime compensatory time off for any authorized work performed: 1) in excess of forty (40) hours per week; or 2) in excess of eight (8) hours per day and that exceed the employee’s daily number of scheduled hours. For example, an employee who is scheduled to work ten (10) hours per day and who works eleven (11) hours on a particular day would be entitled to one (1) hour of overtime. Work performed does not include non-worked hours. Overtime pay is compensated at the rate of one and one-half (1-1/2) times the employee's base rate of pay (not including shift and any other special differentials). Any special differentials that are applicable during overtime hours worked will be computed on the employee’s base rate of pay, not on the overtime rate of pay. Overtime for employees is earned and credited in a minimum of one-half hour increments and is compensated by either pay or compensatory time off. 7.2 Straight Time Pay. Permanent full-time and part-time employees are eligible to receive straight time pay or straight time compensatory time off for hours worked in excess of the employee’s daily number of scheduled hours that do not qualify for overtime pay as described in section 7.1, above. For example, if an employee is scheduled to work from 8 .am. to 5 p.m., but uses accruals for 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. and works from 10 a.m. to 7 p.m., he/she would be entitled to two hours of straight time pay for the 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. hours worked. Straight time pay is calculated at the rate of one (1.0) times the employee’s base rate of pay (not including differentials or shift pays). 7.3 Overtime And Straight Time Compensatory Time. The following provisions shall apply: a. Employees may annually elect to accrue overtime compensatory time off and straight time compensatory time off (hereinafter collectively referred to as “compensatory time off”) in lieu of overtime pay and straight time pay. Eligible employees who elect to receive compensatory time off must agree to do so for a full fiscal year (July 1 through June 30). The employee must notify their department payroll staff of any change in the election by May 31 of each year. b. The names of those employees electing to accrue compensatory time off shall be placed on a list maintained by the Department. Employees who become eligible (i.e., newly hired employees, employees promoting, demoting, etc.) for compensatory time off in accordance with these guidelines must elect to accrue compensatory time or they will be paid for authorized overtime and straight time hours worked. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 116 c. Overtime compensatory time off shall be accrued at the rate of one and one-half (1-1/2) times the actual authorized overtime hours worked by the employee. Straight time compensatory time off will be accrued at the rate of one (1.0) times the actual authorized straight time hours worked by the employee. Compensatory time off will be taken in increments of one (1) minute. d. Employees may not accrue a compensatory time off balance that exceeds one hundred twenty (120) hours (i.e., eighty (80) hours at time and one-half). Once the maximum balance has been attained, authorized straight time and overtime hours will be paid at the applicable straight time or overtime rate. If the employee's balance falls below one hundred twenty (120) hours, the employee shall again accrue compensatory time off for authorized straight time and overtime hours worked until the employee's balance again reaches one hundred twenty (120) hours. e. Accrued compensatory time off shall be carried over for use in the next fiscal year; however, as provided in 7.2.d above, accrued compensatory time off balances may not exceed one hundred twenty (120) hours. f. Employees may not use more than one hundred twenty (120) hours of compensatory time off in any fiscal year period (July 1 - June 30). g. The use of accrued compensatory time off shall be by mutual agreement between the Department Head or his/her designee and the employee. Compensatory time off shall not be taken when the employee would be replaced by another employee who would be eligible to receive, for time worked, either overtime payment or compensatory time accruals as provided for in this Section. This provision may be waived at the discretion of the Department Head or his/her designee. h. When an employee promotes, demotes or transfers from one classification eligible for compensatory time off to another classification eligible for compensatory time off within the same department, the employee's accrued compensatory time off balance will be carried forward with the employee. i. Compensatory time accrual balances will be paid off when an employee moves from one department to another through promotion, demotion or transfer. Said payoff will be made in accordance with the provisions and salary of the class from which the employee is promoting, demoting or transferring as set forth in 7.2.j. below. j. Since employees accrue overtime compensatory time off at the rate of one and one-half (1-1/2) hours for each hour of authorized overtime worked, accrued overtime compensatory time balances will be paid off at the straight time rate for the employee's current salary whenever: 1. the employee separates from County service; 2. the employee retires. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 117 k. The Office of the County Auditor-Controller will establish timekeeping procedures to administer this Section. 7.4 Court Appearance Overtime. The County agrees to provide a minimum of four (4) hours overtime credit when in the line of duty employees in the classes of District Attorney Inspector and District Attorney Senior Inspector are required to attend a duly constituted judicial proceeding on his/her regularly scheduled day off. SECTION 8 – CELL PHONES Inspectors and Senior Inspectors are required to retain a County-issued cell phone in his/her immediate possession at all times, and keep it activated while on duty or when not available at the phone number provided to the Department for after hours contact. Inspectors and Senior Inspectors shall respond by telephone as soon as possible after receiving a message. SECTION 9 - ON-CALL/CALL BACK The Senior Inspector will be on-call for one (1) week intervals beginning at 0800 hours on a Wednesday and continuing until 0800 hours the following Wednesday. During the on-call interval, the employee must be ready to immediately report for duty and must arrange so that a supervisor can reach the employee within ten (10) minutes or less. A County vehicle may be used and driven home during the on-call interval, and must be used in compliance with the County Vehicle Use Policy. Inspectors of all classes, whether or not on-call, may be called out to an incident after normal working hours, and may be required to respond in their personal vehicle. If an employee uses their personal vehicle they shall be reimbursed per Section 25 – Mileage, of this MOU. Any employee called out to an incident after normal work hours shall receive overtime or compensatory time at the appropriate rate for actual hours worked plus one (1) hour. An employee who is called back after normal working hours shall be paid a minimum of two (2) hours at the appropriate rate for each call back. Employees who are assigned in writing to on-call status will be compensated at the rate of two hundred seventy-two dollars and fifty cents ($272.50) per week. SECTION 10 - SENIORITY, WORKFORCE REDUCTION, LAYOFF & REASSIGNMENT 10.1 Workforce Reduction. In the event that funding reductions or shortfalls in funding occur in a department or are expected, which may result in layoffs, the department will notify the Association and take the following actions: AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 118 a. Identify the classification(s) in which position reductions may be required due to funding reductions or shortfalls. b. Advise employees in those classifications that position reductions may occur in their classifications. c. Accept voluntary leaves of absence from employees in those classifications which do not appear to be potentially impacted by possible position reductions when such leaves can be accommodated by the department. d. Approve requests for reduction in hours, lateral transfers, and voluntary demotions to vacant, funded positions in classes not scheduled for layoffs within the department, as well as to other departments not experiencing funding reductions or shortfalls when it is a viable operational alternative for the department(s). e. Review various alternatives which will help mitigate the impact of the layoff by working through the Tactical Employment Team program (TET) to: 1. Maintain an employee skills inventory bank to be used as a basis for referrals to other employment opportunities. 2. Determine if there are other positions to which employees may be transferred. 3. Refer interested persons to vacancies which occur in other job classes for which they qualify and can use their layoff eligibility. 4. Establish workshops to aid laid off employees in areas such as resume preparation, alternate career counseling, job search strategy, and interviewing skills. g. When it appears to the Department Head and/or Labor Relations Manager that the Board of Supervisors may take action which will result in the layoff of employees in a representation unit, the Labor Relations Manager shall notify the Association of the possibility of such layoffs and shall meet and confer with the Association regarding the implementation of the action. 10.2 Separation Through Layoff. a. Grounds for Layoff. Any employee(s) having permanent status in position(s) in the merit service may be laid off when the position is no longer necessary, or for reasons of economy, lack of work, lack of funds or for such other reason(s) as the Board of Supervisors deems sufficient for abolishing the position(s). AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 119 b. Order of Layoff. The order of layoff in a department shall be based on inverse seniority in the class of positions, the employee in that department with least seniority being laid off first and so on. c. Layoff By Displacement. 1. In the Same Class. A laid off permanent full time employee may displace an employee in the department having less seniority in the same class who occupies a permanent-intermittent or permanent part-time position, the least senior employee being displaced first. 2. In the Same Level or Lower Class. A laid off or displaced employee who had achieved permanent status in a class at the same or lower salary level as determined by the salary schedule in effect at the time of layoff may displace within the department and in the class of an employee having less seniority; the least senior employee being displaced first, and so on with senior displaced employees displacing junior employees. d. Particular Rules on Displacing. 1. Permanent-intermittent and permanent part-time employees may displace only employees holding permanent positions of the same type respectively. 2. A permanent full time employee may displace any intermittent or part-time employee with less seniority 1) in the same class or, 2) in a class of the same or lower salary level if no full time employee in a class at the same or lower salary level has less seniority than the displacing employees. 3. Former permanent full time employees who have voluntarily become permanent part-time employees for the purpose of reducing the impact of a proposed layoff with the written approval of the Director of Human Resources or designee retain their permanent full time employee seniority rights for layoff purposes only and may in a later layoff displace a full time employee with less seniority as provided in these rules. e. Seniority. An employee's seniority within a class for layoff and displacement purposes shall be determined by adding the employee's length of service in the particular class in question to the employee's length of service in other classes at the same or higher salary levels as determined by the salary schedule in effect at the time of layoff. Employees reallocated or transferred without examination from one class to another class having a salary within five percent (5%) of the former class shall carry the seniority accrued in the former class into the new class. Employees reallocated to a new deep class upon its initiation or otherwise reallocated to a deep class because the duties of the position occupied are appropriately described in the deep class shall carry into the deep class the seniority accrued or carried forward in the former class and seniority accrued in AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 120 other classes which have been included in the deep class. Service for layoff and displacement purposes includes only the employee's last continuous permanent County employment. Periods of separation may not be bridged to extend such service unless the separation is a result of layoff in which case bridging will be authorized if the employee is reemployed in a permanent position within the period of layoff eligibility. Approved leaves of absence as provided for in these rules and regulations shall not constitute a period of separation. In the event of ties in seniority rights in the particular class in question, such ties shall be broken by length of last continuous permanent County employment. If there remain ties in seniority rights, such ties shall be broken by counting total time in the department in permanent employment. Any remaining ties shall be broken by random selection among the employees involved. f. Eligibility for Layoff List. Whenever any person who has permanent status is laid off, has been displaced, has been demoted by displacement or has voluntarily demoted in lieu of layoff or displacement, or has transferred in lieu of layoff or displacement, the person's name shall be placed on the layoff list for the class of positions from which that person has been removed. g. Order of Names on Layoff. First, layoff lists shall contain the names of persons laid off, displaced, or demoted as a result of a layoff or displacement, or who have voluntarily demoted in lieu of layoff or displacement or who have transferred in lieu of layoff or displacement. Names shall be listed in order of layoff seniority in the class from which laid off, displaced, demoted or transferred on the date of layoff, the most senior person listed first. In case of ties in seniority, the seniority rules shall apply except that where there is a class seniority tie between persons laid off from different departments, the tie(s) shall be broken by length of last continuous permanent County employment with remaining ties broken by random selection among the employees involved. h. Duration of Layoff and Reemployment Rights. The name of any person granted reemployment privileges shall continue on the appropriate list for a period of two (2) years. Persons placed on layoff lists shall continue on the appropriate list for a period of two (2) years. i. Certification of Persons From Layoff Lists. Layoff lists contain the name(s) of person(s) laid off, displaced or demoted by displacement or voluntarily demoted in lieu of layoff or who transferred in lieu of layoff or displacement. When a request for personnel is received from the appointing authority of a department from which an eligible(s) was laid off, the appointing authority shall receive and appoint the eligible highest on the layoff list from the department. When a request for personnel is received from a department from which an eligible(s) was not laid off, the appointing authority shall receive and appoint the eligible highest on the layoff list who shall be subject to a probationary period. A person employed from AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 121 a layoff list shall be appointed at the same step of the salary range the employee held on the day of layoff. j. Removal of Names from Reemployment & Layoff Lists. The Director of Human Resources may remove the name of any eligible from a reemployment or layoff list for any reason listed below: 1. For any cause stipulated in Section 404.1 of the Personnel Management Regulations. 2. On evidence that the eligible cannot be located by postal authorities. 3. On receipt of a statement from the appointing authority or eligible that the eligible declines certification or indicates no further desire for appointment in the class. 4. If three (3) offers of permanent appointment to the class for which the eligible list was established have been declined by the eligible. 5. If the eligible fails to respond to the Director of Human Resources or the appointing authority within ten (10) days to written notice of certification mailed to the person's last known address. 6. If the person on the reemployment or layoff list is appointed to another position in the same or lower classification, the name of the person shall be removed. 7. However, if the first permanent appointment of a person on a layoff list is to a lower class which has a top step salary lower than the top step of the class from which the person was laid off, the name of the person shall not be removed from the layoff list. Any subsequent appointment of such person from the layoff list shall result in removal of that person's name. k. Removal of Names from Reemployment and Layoff Certifications. The Director of Human Resources may remove the name of any eligible from a reemployment or layoff certification if the eligible fails to respond within five (5) days to a written notice of certification mailed to the person's last known address. 10.3 Notice. The County agrees to give employees scheduled for layoff at least ten (10) work days notice prior to their last day of employment. 10.4 Special Employment Lists. The County will establish a TET Employment Pool which will include the names of all laid off County employees. Special employment lists for job classes may be established from the pool. Persons placed on a special employment list must meet the minimum qualifications for the class. An appointment from such a list will not affect the individual's status on a layoff list(s). AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 122 10.5 Reassignment of Laid Off Employees. Employees who displaced within the same classification from full time to part-time or intermittent status in a layoff, or who voluntarily reduced their work hours to reduce the impact of layoff, or who accepted a position of another status than that from which they were laid off upon referral from the layoff list, may request reassignment back to their pre-layoff status (full time or part-time or increased hours). The request must be in writing in accord with each department's reassignment bid or selection process. Employees will be advised of the reassignment procedure to be followed to obtain reassignment back to their former status at the time of the workforce reduction. The most senior laid off employee in this status who requests such a reassignment will be selected for the vacancy; except when a more senior laid off individual remains on the layoff list and has not been appointed back to the class from which laid off, a referral from the layoff list will be made to fill the vacancy. SECTION 11 - HOLIDAYS 11.1 Holidays Observed. The County will observe the following holidays: January 1st, known as New Year's Day Third Monday in January known as Dr. M. L. King, Jr. Day Third Monday in February, known as President's Day Last Monday in May, known as Memorial Day July 4th known as Independence Day First Monday in September, known as Labor Day November 11th, known as Veterans Day Fourth Thursday in November, known as Thanksgiving Day Friday after Thanksgiving Day December 25th, known as Christmas Day Such other days as the Board of Supervisors may by resolution designate as holidays. Each full-time employee will accrue two (2) hours of personal holiday credit per month. Such personal holiday time may be taken in increments of one-tenth (1/10) of an hour, and preference of personal holidays will be given to employees according to their seniority in their department as reasonably as possible. Permanent part-time employees will receive personal holiday credit in the same ratio to the personal holiday credit given full-time employees as the number of hours per week in the part-time employee's schedule bears to the number of hours in the regular full- time schedule. Employees shall accrue their personal holiday credit during months they are in pay status provided however that no employee may accrue more than forty (40) hours of personal holiday credit. On separation from County service, an employee shall be paid for any unused personal holiday credits at the employee's then current pay rate. 11.2 Holidays Observed – Full-Time Employees: Full-time employees on a regular schedule are entitled to observe a holiday (day off work), without a reduction in pay, AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 123 whenever a holiday is observed by the County. Any holiday observed by the County that falls on a Saturday is observed on the preceding Friday and any holiday that falls on a Sunday is observed on the following Monday. 11.3 Holidays Observed – Part-Time Employees: Permanent, part-time employees are entitled to observe a holiday (day off work) in the same ratio as the number of hours in the part time employee’s weekly schedule bears to forty (40) hours. 11.4 Holiday is WORKED and Holiday Falls on Regularly Scheduled Work Day (for employees on a Regular Work Schedule, the holiday always falls on the employee’s regularly scheduled work day): When a full-time employee works on a holiday that falls on the employee’s regularly scheduled work day, the employee is entitled to receive his/her regular salary. The employee is also entitled to receive holiday pay at the rate of one and one half (1.5) times his/her base rate of pay (not including differentials) for all hours worked, up to a maximum of eight (8) hours. 11.5 Automated Time Keeping: This agreement may be re-opened at the request of either party for the purpose of meeting and conferring regarding the establishment of an automated time keeping system. SECTION 12 - VACATION LEAVE 12.1 Vacation Allowance. Employees in permanent positions are entitled to vacation with pay. Accrual is based upon straight time hours of working time per calendar month of service and begins on the date of appointment to a permanent position. Increased accruals begin on the first of the month following the month in which the employee qualifies. Accrual for portions of a month shall be in minimum amounts of one (1) hour calculated on the same basis as for partial month compensation pursuant to Section 5.6 of this MOU. Vacation credits may be taken in one (1) minute increments and may not be rounded. Vacation credits may not be taken during the first six (6) months of employment (not necessarily synonymous with probationary status) except where sick leave has been exhausted; and none shall be allowed in excess of actual accrual at the time vacation is taken. 12.2 Vacation Accrual Rates. All employees in the bargaining unit are entitled to the following vacation accruals: Monthly Maximum Accrual Cumulative Length of Service Hours Hours Under 11 years 10 240 11 years 10-2/3 256 12 years 11-1/3 272 13 years 12 288 14 years 12-2/3 304 15 thru 19 years 13-1/3 320 20 thru 24 years 16-2/3 400 25 thru 29 years 20 480 30 years and up 23-1/3 560 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 124 Service Award Date: An employee’s Service Award Date is used to determine when an employee begins to accrue the next higher number of vacation hours. The Service Award Date is the first date of a temporary, provisional, or permanent appointment to a position in the County. If an employee is first appointed to a temporary or provisional position and then later appointed to a permanent position, the Service Award Date for that employee is the date of the temporary or provisional appointment. Increased Vacation Accruals Granted in Recognition of Long Service: Each employee is eligible to begin to accrue increased vacation hours on the first day of the month following the employee's Service Award Date. Example One: 1. The employee’s Service Award Date is January 1, 1988. 2. The employee reached 20 years of service on January 1, 2008. 3. February 1, 2008 is the date on which the employee is eligible to begin accruing 16.66 hours of vacation time each month. Example Two: 1. An employee’s Service Award Date is February 24, 1987. 2. The employee reached 20 years of service on February 24, 2007. 3. March 1, 2007 is the date on which the employee is eligible to begin accruing 16.66 hours of vacation time each month. 12.3 Accrual During Leave Without Pay. No employee who has been granted a leave without pay or unpaid military leave shall accrue any vacation credit during the time of such leave, nor shall an employee who is absent without pay accrue vacation credit during the absence. 12.4 Vacation Allowance for Separated Employees. On separation from County service, an employee shall be paid for any unused vacation credits at the employee's then current pay rate. 12.5 Accrual on Prorated Basis. Employees in permanent part-time and permanent- intermittent positions shall accrue vacation benefits on a prorated basis as provided in Resolution 81/1165, Section 32-2.006. 12.6 Vacation Leave on Reemployment from a Layoff List. Employees with six (6) months or more service in a permanent position prior to their layoff, who are employed from a layoff list, shall be considered as having completed six (6) months tenure in a permanent position for the purpose of vacation leave. The appointing authority or designee will advise the Auditor-Controller's Payroll Unit in each case where such vacation is authorized so that appropriate payroll system override actions can be taken. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 125 SECTION 13 - SICK LEAVE 13.1 Purpose of Sick Leave. The primary purpose of paid sick leave is to ensure employees against loss of pay for temporary absences from work due to illness or injury. It is a benefit extended by the County and may be used only as authorized; it is not paid time off which employees may use for personal activities. 13.2 Credits to and Charges Against Sick Leave. Sick leave credits accrue at the rate of eight (8) working hours credit for each completed month of service. Employees who work a portion of a month are entitled to a pro rata share of the monthly sick leave credit computed on the same basis as is partial month compensation. Credits to and charges against sick leave are made in minimum amounts of one (1) minute increments and may not be rounded. Unused sick leave credits accumulate from year to year. When an employee is separated other than through retirement, accumulated sick leave credits shall be canceled, unless the separation results from layoff, in which case the accumulated credits shall be restored if re-employed in a permanent position within the period of lay off eligibility. Upon retirement, an employee's accumulated sick leave is converted to retirement on the basis of one (1) day of retirement service credit for each day of accumulated sick leave credit. 13.3 Policies Governing the Use of Paid Sick Leave. As indicated above, the primary purpose of paid sick leave is to ensure employees against loss of pay for temporary absences from work due to illness or injury. The following definitions apply: Immediate Family means and includes only the spouse, son, stepson, daughter, stepdaughter, father, stepfather, mother, stepmother, brother, sister, grandparent, grandchild, father-in-law, mother-in-law, daughter-in-law, son-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, foster children, aunt, uncle, cousin, stepbrother, stepsister, or domestic partner of an employee and/or includes any other person for whom the employee is the legal guardian or conservator, or any person who is claimed as a "dependent" for IRS reporting purposes by the employee. Employee means any person employed by Contra Costa County in an allocated position in the County service. Paid Sick Leave Credits means those sick leave credits provided for by County Salary Regulations and Memoranda of Understanding. Condition/Reason: With respect to necessary verbal contacts and confirmations which occur between the department and the employee when sick leave is requested or verified, a brief statement in non-technical terms from the employee regarding inability to work due to injury or illness is sufficient. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 126 Accumulated paid sick leave credits may be used, subject to appointing authority approval, by an employee in pay status, but only in the following instances: a. Temporary Illness or Injury of an Employee. Paid sick leave credits may be used when the employee is off work because of a temporary illness or injury. b. Permanent Disability Sick Leave. Permanent disability means the employee suffers from a disabling physical injury or illness and is thereby prevented from engaging in any County occupation for which the employee is qualified by reason of education, training or experience. Sick leave may be used by permanently disabled employees until all accruals of the employee have been exhausted or until the employee is retired by the Retirement Board, subject to the following conditions: 1. An application for retirement due to disability has been filed with the Retirement Board. 2. Satisfactory medical evidence of such disability is received by the appointing authority within thirty (30) days of the start of use of sick leave for permanent disability. 3. The appointing authority may review medical evidence and order further examination as deemed necessary, and may terminate use of sick leave when such further examination demonstrates that the employee is not disabled, or when the appointing authority determines that the medical evidence submitted by the employee is insufficient, or where the above conditions have not been met. c. Communicable Disease. An employee may use paid sick leave credits when under a physician's order to remain secluded due to exposure to a communicable disease. d. Sick Leave Utilization for Pregnancy Disability. Employees whose disability is caused or contributed to by pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, childbirth, or recovery therefrom, shall be allowed to utilize sick leave credit to the maximum accrued by such employee during the period of such disability under the conditions set forth below: 1. Application for such leave must be made by the employee to the appointing authority accompanied by a written statement of disability from the employee's attending physician. The statement must address itself to the employee's general physical condition having considered the nature of the work performed by the employee, and it must indicate the date of the commencement of the disability as well as the date the physician anticipates the disability to terminate. 2. If an employee does not apply for leave and the appointing authority believes that the employee is not able to properly perform her work or that AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 127 her general health is impaired due to disability caused or contributed to by pregnancy, miscarriage, abortion, childbirth or recovery therefrom the employee shall be required to undergo a physical examination by a physician selected by the County. Should the medical report so recommend, a mandatory leave shall be imposed upon the employee for the duration of the disability. 3. Sick leave may not be utilized after the employee has been released from the hospital unless the employee has provided the County with a written statement from her attending physician stating that her disability continues and the projected dates of the employee's recovery from such disability. e. Medical & Dental Appointments. An employee may use paid sick leave credits: 1. For working time used in keeping medical and dental appointments for the employee's own care; and 2. For working time used by an employee for prescheduled medical and dental appointments for an immediate family member. f. Emergency Care of Family. An employee may use paid sick leave credits for working time used in cases of illness or injury to an immediate family member. g. Death of Family Member. An employee may use paid sick leave credits for working time used because of a death in the employee's immediate family, but this shall not exceed three (3) working days, plus up to two (2) days of work time for necessary travel. h. Accumulated paid sick leave credits may not be used in the following situations: 1. Self-inflicted Injury. For time off from work for an employee's illness or injury caused by his/her willful misconduct. 2. Vacation. Paid sick leave credits may not be used for an employee's illness or injury which occurs while he/she is on vacation but the County Administrator may authorize it when extenuating circumstances exist and the appointing authority approves. 3. Not in Pay Status. Paid sick leave credits may not be used when the employee would otherwise be eligible to use paid sick leave credits but is not in pay status. 13.4 Administration of Sick Leave. The proper administration of sick leave is a responsibility of the employee and the Department Head. The following procedures apply: a. Employees are responsible for notifying the Investigative Unit Supervisor of an absence as early as possible prior to the commencement of their work shift and AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 128 in accordance with operational requirements. Notification shall include the reason and possible duration of the absence. b. Employees are responsible for keeping their department informed of their continuing condition and probable date of return to work. c. Employees are responsible for obtaining advance approval from their appointing authority or designee for the schedule time of prearranged personal or family medical and dental appointments. The use of sick leave may be denied if these procedures are not followed. Abuse of sick leave on the part of the employee is cause for disciplinary action. To ascertain the propriety of claims against sick leave, the Department Head may make such investigations as he/she deems necessary including medical verification of illness. 13.5 Disability. a. An employee physically or mentally incapacitated for the performance of duty is subject to dismissal, suspension or demotion, subject to the County Employees Retirement Law of l937. An appointing authority after giving notice may place an employee on leave if the appointing authority has filed an application for disability retirement for the employee, or whom the appointing authority believes to be temporarily or permanently physically or mentally incapacitated for the performance of the employee's duties. b. An appointing authority who has reasonable cause to believe that there are physical or mental health conditions present in an employee which endanger the health or safety of the employee, other employees, or the public, or which impair the employee's performance of duty, may order the employee to undergo at County expense and on the employee's paid time, a physical, medical and/or psychiatric examination by a licensed physician or psychologist and receive a report of the findings on such examination. If the examining physician or psychologist recommends that treatment for physical or mental health problems, including leave, are in the best interests of the employee or the County in relation to the employee overcoming any disability and/or performing his/her duties the appointing authority may direct the employee to take such leave and/or undergo such treatment. c. Leave due to temporary or permanent disability shall be without prejudice to the employee's right to use sick leave, vacation, or any other benefit to which the employee is entitled other than regular salary. The Human Resources Director may order lost pay restored for good cause and subject to the employee's duty to mitigate damages. d. Before an employee returns to work from any absence for illness or injury, other leave of absence or disability leave, exceeding two weeks in duration, the appointing authority may order the employee to undergo at County expense a physical, medical, and/or psychiatric examination by a licensed physician or psychologist, and may consider a report of the findings on such examination. If AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 129 the report shows that such employee is physically or mentally incapacitated for the performance of duty, the appointing authority may take such action as he/she deems necessary in accordance with appropriate provisions of this MOU. e. Before an employee is placed on an unpaid leave of absence or suspended because of physical or mental incapacity under (A) or (B) above, the employee shall be given notice of the proposed leave of absence or suspension by letter or memorandum, delivered personally or by certified mail, containing the following: 1. a statement of the leave of absence or suspension proposed; 2. the proposed dates or duration of the leave or suspension which may be indeterminate until a certain physical or mental health condition has been attained by the employee; 3. a statement of the basis upon which the action is being taken; 4. a statement that the employee may review the materials upon which the action is taken; 5. a statement that the employee has until a specified date (not less than seven (7) work days from personal delivery or mailing of the notice) to respond to the appointing authority orally or in writing. f. Pending response to the notice the appointing authority for cause specified in writing may place the employee on a temporary leave of absence, with pay. g. The employee to whom the notice has been delivered or mailed shall have seven (7) work days to respond to the appointing authority either orally or in writing before the proposed action may be taken. h. After having complied with the notice requirements above, the appointing authority may order the leave of absence or suspension in writing stating specifically the basis upon which the action is being taken, delivering the order to the employee either personally or by certified mail, effective either upon personal delivery or deposit in the U.S. Postal Service. i. An employee who is placed on leave or suspended under this section may, within ten (10) calendar days after personal delivery or mailing to the employee of the order, appeal the order in writing through the Director of Human Resources to the Merit Board. Alternatively, the employee may file a written election with the Director of Human Resources waiving the employee's right to appeal to the Merit Board in favor of appeal to a Disability Review Arbitrator. j. In the event of an appeal either to the Merit Board or the Disability Review Arbitrator, the employee has the burden of proof to show that either: AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 130 1. the physical or mental health condition cited by the appointing authority does not exist, or 2. the physical or mental health condition does exist, but it is not sufficient to prevent, preclude, or impair the employee's performance of duty, or is not sufficient to endanger the health or safety of the employee, other employees, or the public. k. If the appeal is to the Merit Board, the order and appeal shall be transmitted by the Director of Human Resources to the Merit Board for hearing under the Merit Board's Procedures, Section 1114-1128 inclusive. Medical reports submitted in evidence in such hearings shall remain confidential information and shall not be a part of the public record. l. If the appeal is to a Disability Review Arbitrator, the employee (and his/her representative) will meet with the County's representative to mutually select the Disability Review Arbitrator, who may be a de facto arbitrator, or a physician, or a rehabilitation specialist, or some other recognized specialist mutually selected by the parties. The arbitrator shall hear and review the evidence. The decision of the Disability Review Arbitrator shall be binding on both the County and the employee. Scope of the Arbitrator's Review. a. The arbitrator may affirm, modify or revoke the leave of absence or suspension. b. The arbitrator may make his/her decision based only on evidence submitted by the County and the employee. c. The arbitrator may order back pay or paid sick leave credits for any period of leave of absence or suspension if the leave or suspension is found not to be sustainable, subject to the employee's duty to mitigate damages. d. The arbitrator's fees and expenses shall be paid one-half by the County and one-half by the employee or employee's association. 13.6 Workers' Compensation. a. State Labor Code 4850 Pay. Law enforcement officers as defined in State Labor Code 4850 who are members of the Contra Costa County Retirement System continue to receive full salary benefits in lieu of temporary disability during any absence from work which qualifies for workers' compensation benefits. Currently, the maximum 4850 pay is one (1) year for any injury or illness. To be eligible for this benefit the employee must be under the care of a physician. All 4850 pay shall be approved by the County Administrator's Office, Risk Management Division. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 131 b. Sick Leave and Vacation. Sick leave and vacation shall accrue in accordance with the provision of State Labor Code 4850. c. 4850 Pay Beyond One Year. If an injured employee remains eligible for workers' compensation temporary disability benefits beyond one (1) year, full salary will continue by integrating sick leave and/or vacation accruals with workers' compensation benefits (use of vacation accruals must be approved by the department and the employee). If salary integration is no longer available because accruals are exhausted, workers' compensation benefits will be paid directly to the employee as prescribed by workers' compensation laws. d. Rehabilitation Integration. An injured employee who is eligible for workers' compensation rehabilitation temporary disability benefits and who has exhausted 4850 pay eligibility will continue to receive full salary by integrating sick leave and/or vacation accruals with workers' compensation rehabilitation temporary disability benefits. When these accruals are exhausted, the rehabilitation temporary disability benefits will be paid directly to the employee as prescribed by workers' compensation laws. e. Health Insurance. The County contribution to the employee's group insurance plan(s) continues during the 4850 pay period and during integration of sick leave or vacation with workers' compensation benefits. f. Integration Formula. An employee's sick leave and/or vacation charges shall be calculated as follows: C = 8 [1 - (W ÷ S)] C = Sick leave or vacation charge per day (in hrs.) W = Statutory workers' compensation for a month S = Monthly salary g. Medical Examinations. Whenever possible, medical exams or follow-up medical appointments for job-related illness or injury scheduled during work hours will be at the beginning or end of the employee's shift so as to minimize time lost from work. 13.7 Integration of SDI. On May 26, 1981 the Board of Supervisors established a Labor Management Committee to administer a rehabilitation program for disabled County employees. It is understood that the benefits specified above in this Section 13 shall be coordinated with any disabled employee's rehabilitation program. 13.8 Accrual During Leave Without Pay. No employee who has been granted a leave without pay or an unpaid military leave shall accrue any sick leave credits during the time of such leave nor shall an employee who is absent without pay accrue sick leave credits during the absence. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 132 SECTION 14 - LEAVE OF ABSENCE 14.1 Leave Without Pay. Any employee who has permanent status in the classified service may be granted a leave of absence without pay upon written request, approved by the appointing authority; provided, however, that leaves for pregnancy, pregnancy disability, serious health conditions, and family care shall be granted in accordance with applicable state and federal law. 14.2 General Administration - Leaves of Absence. Requests for leave without pay shall be made upon forms prescribed by the Director of Human Resources and shall state specifically the reason for the request, the date when it is desired to begin the leave, and the probable date of return. a. Leave without pay may be granted for up to one (1) year for any of the following reasons: 1. Illness, disability or serious health condition; 2. pregnancy or pregnancy disability; 3. family care; 4. to take a course of study such as will increase the employee's usefulness on return to the position; 5. for other reasons or circumstances acceptable to the appointing authority. b. An employee should request a leave of absence at least thirty (30) days before the leave is to begin if the need for the leave is foreseeable. If the need is not foreseeable, the employee must provide written notice to the employer within five (5) days of learning of the event by which the need for a leave of absence arises. c. An appointing authority may extend such leave for additional periods. The procedure in granting extensions shall be the same as that in granting the original leave, provided that the request for extension must be made not later than thirty (30) calendar days before the expiration of the original leave. 14.3 Family Care or Medical Leave (FMLA). a. Definitions. For medical and family care leaves of absence under Section 14, the following definitions apply: 1. Child: A biological, adopted, or foster child, stepchild, legal ward, conservatee, or a child who is under eighteen (18) years of age for whom an employee stands in loco parentis or for whom the employee is the guardian or conservator, or an adult dependent child of the employee. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 133 2. Parent: A biological, foster, or adoptive parent, a stepparent, legal guardian, conservator, or other person standing in loco parentis to a child. 3. Spouse: A partner in marriage as defined in California Civil Code Section 4100. 4. Domestic Partner: An unmarried person, eighteen (18) years or older, to whom the employee is not related and with whom the employee resides and shares the common necessities of life. 5. Serious Health Condition: An illness, injury, impairment, or physical or mental condition which involves either inpatient care in a hospital, hospice or residential health care facility or continuing treatment or continuing supervision by a health care provider (e.g. physician or surgeon) and which, for family care leave only, warrants the participation of a family member to provide care during a period of treatment or supervision, as defined by state and federal law. 6. Certification for Family Care Leave: A written communication to the employer from a health care provider of a person for whose care the leave is being taken which need not identify the serious health condition involved, but shall contain: a. the date, if known, on which the serious health condition commenced; b. the probable duration of the condition; c. an estimate of the amount of time which the employee needs to render care or supervision; d. a statement that the serious health condition warrants the participation of a family member to provide care during period of treatment or supervision; e. if for intermittent leave or a reduced work schedule leave, the certification should indicate that the intermittent leave or reduced work schedule leave is necessary for the care of the individual or will assist in their recovery, and its expected duration. 7. Certification for Medical Leave: A written communication from a health care provider of an employee with a serious health condition or illness to the employer, which need not identify the serious health condition involved, but shall contain: a. the date, if known, on which the serious health condition commenced; b. the probable duration of the condition; AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 134 c. a statement that the employee is unable to perform the functions of the employee's job; d. if for intermittent leave or a reduced work schedule leave, the certification should indicate the medical necessity for the intermittent leave or reduced work schedule leave and its expected duration. 8. Comparable Positions: A position with the same or similar duties and pay which can be performed at the same or similar geographic location as the position held prior to the leave. Ordinarily, the job assignment will be the same duties in the same program area located in the same city, although specific clients, caseload, co-workers, supervisor(s), or other staffing may have changed during an employee's leave. b. Section 14.2 notwithstanding, upon request to the appointing authority, during a “rolling” twelve (12) month period measured backward from the date an employee uses his/her/her FMLA leave, any employee who has permanent status shall be entitled to, and shall be granted, at least twelve (12) weeks leave (less if so requested by the employee) for: 1. medical leave of absence for the employee's own serious health condition which makes the employee unable to perform the functions of the employee's position; or 2. family care leave of absence without pay for reason of the birth of a child of the employee, the placement of a child with an employee in connection with the adoption or foster care of the child by the employee, or the serious illness or health condition of a child, parent, spouse, or domestic partner of the employee. The employee may be asked to provide certification of the need for family care leave or medical leave. Additional period(s) of family care or medical leave may be granted by the appointing authority. c. Intermittent Use of Leave. The twelve (12) week entitlement may be in broken periods, intermittently on a regular or irregular basis, or may include reduced work schedules depending on the specific circumstances and situations surrounding the request for leave. The twelve (12) weeks may include use of appropriate available paid leave accruals when accruals are used to maintain pay status, but use of such accruals is not required beyond that specified in Section 14.6.b below. When paid leave accruals are used for a medical or family care leave, such time shall be counted as a part of the twelve (12) week entitlement. d. Aggregate Use for Spouse. In the situation where husband and wife are both employed by the County, the family care or medical leave entitlement based on the birth, adoption or foster care of a child is limited to an aggregate for both AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 135 employees together of twelve (12) weeks during a “rolling” twelve (12) month period measured backward from the date the employee uses his/her FMLA leave. Employees requesting family care leave are required to advise their appointing authority(ies) when their spouse is also employed by the County. 14.4 Pregnancy Disability Leave. Insofar as pregnancy disability leave is used under Section 13.3.d - Sick Leave Utilization for Pregnancy Disability, that time will not be considered a part of the twelve (12) week family care leave period. 14.5 Group Health Plan Coverage. a. During Leave of Absence. Employees who were members of one of the group health plans prior to commencement of their leave of absence can maintain their health plan coverage with the County contribution by maintaining their employment in pay status as described in Section 14.6. In order to maintain such coverage, employees are required to pay timely the full employee contribution to maintain their group health plan coverage, either through payroll deduction or by paying the County directly. b. During Medical or Family Care Leave. During the twelve (12) weeks of an approved medical or family care leave under Section 14.3 above, the County will continue its contribution for such health plan coverage even if accruals are not available for use to maintain pay status as required under Section 14.6. In order to maintain such coverage, employees are required to pay timely the full employee contribution to maintain their group health plan coverage, either through payroll deduction or by paying the County directly. 14.6 Leave Without Pay - Use of Accruals. a. All Leaves of Absence. During the first twelve (12) month period of any leave of absence without pay, an employee may elect to maintain pay status each month by using at least 0.1 hour of available sick leave (if so entitled under Section 13 - Sick Leave), vacation, floating holiday, compensatory time off or other accruals or entitlements; in other words, during the first twelve (12) months, a leave of absence without pay may be "broken" into segments and accruals used on a monthly basis at the employee's discretion. After the first twelve (12) months, the leave period may not be "broken" into segments and accruals may not be used, except when required by SDI/Sick Leave Integration. b. Family Care or Medical Leave (FMLA). During the twelve (12) weeks of an approved medical or family care leave, if a portion of that leave will be on a leave of absence without pay, the employee will be required to use at least 0.1 hour of sick leave (if so entitled under Section 13 - Sick Leave), vacation floating holiday, compensatory time off or other accruals or entitlements if such are available, although use of additional accruals is permitted under subsection A. above. c. Sick leave accruals may not be used during any leave of absence, except as allowed under Section 13 - Sick Leave. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 136 14.7 Military Leave. Any employee who is required to serve as a member of the State Militia or the United States Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard or any division thereof shall be granted a military leave for the period of such service, plus ninety (90) days. An employee who volunteers for such service shall be granted a leave of absence if necessary in accordance with applicable state or federal laws. Upon the termination of such service or upon honorable discharge, the employee shall be entitled to return to his/her position in the classified service provided such still exists and the employee is otherwise qualified, without any loss of standing of any kind whatsoever. An employee who has been granted a military leave shall not, by reason of such absence, suffer any loss of vacation, holiday, or sick leave privileges which may be accrued at the time of such leave, nor shall the employee be prejudiced thereby with reference to salary adjustments or continuation of employment. For purposes of determining eligibility for salary adjustments or seniority in case of layoff or promotional examination, time on military leave shall be considered as time in County service. Any employee who has been granted a military leave, may upon return, be required to furnish such evidence of performance of military service or of honorable discharge as the Director of Human Resources may deem necessary. 14.8 Return From Leave of Absence. a. Early Return. Whenever an employee who has been granted a leave without pay desires to return before the expiration of such leave, the employee shall submit a request to the appointing authority in writing at least fifteen (15) days in advance of the proposed early return provided, however, that less notification may be approved at the discretion of the appointing authority or his/her designee. Early return is subject to prior approval by the appointing authority. The Human Resources Department shall be notified promptly of such return. b. Leave of Absence Reinstatement. Any permanent employee who requests reinstatement to the classification held by the employee in the same department at the time the employee was granted a leave of absence, shall be reinstated to a position in that classification and department and then only on the basis of seniority. c. Leave of Absence Replacement. In case of severance from service or displacement by reason of the reinstatement of a permanent employee returning from a leave of absence, the provisions of Section 10 (Seniority, Workforce Reduction, Layoff, & Reassignment Seniority) shall apply. d. Reinstatement From Family Care or Medical Leave of Absence. In the case of a family care or medical leave, an employee on a 5/40 schedule shall be reinstated to the same or comparable position if the return to work is after no more than ninety (90) work days of leave from the initial date of a continuous leave, including use of accruals, or within the equivalent on an alternate work schedule. A full time employee taking an intermittent or reduced work schedule leave shall be reinstated to the same or comparable position if the return to work on a full schedule is after no more than 720 hours, including use of accruals, of AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 137 intermittent or reduced work schedule leave. At the time the original leave is approved, the appointing authority shall notify the employee in writing of the final date to return to work, or the maximum number of hours of leave, in order to guarantee reinstatement to the same or comparable position. An employee on a schedule other than 5/40 shall have the time frame for reinstatement to the same or comparable position adjusted on a pro rata basis. 14.9 Appeal of Denial. The decision of the appointing authority on granting or denying leave or early return from leave shall be subject to appeal to the Director of Human Resources and not subject to appeal through the grievance procedure set forth in this MOU. 14.10 Salary Review While on Leave of Absence. The salary of an employee who is on leave of absence from a County position on any anniversary date and who has not been absent from the position on leave without pay more than six (6) months during the preceding year shall receive salary increments that may accrue to them during the period of military leave. 14.11 Unauthorized Absence. An unauthorized absence from the work site or failure to report for duty after a leave request has been disapproved, revoked, or canceled by the appointing authority, or at the expiration of a leave shall be without pay. Such absence may also be grounds for disciplinary action. 14.12 Furlough Days Without Pay. Subject to the prior written approval of the appointing authority, employees may elect to take furlough days or hours without pay (pre-authorized absence without pay), up to a maximum of fifteen (15) calendar days for any one period. Longer pre-authorized absences without pay are considered leaves of absence without pay. Employees who take furlough time shall have their compensation for the portion of the month worked computed in accord with Section 5.6 - Compensation for Portion of Month of this MOU. Full time and part time employees who take furlough time shall have their vacation, sick leave, floating holiday and any other payroll-computed accruals computed as though they had worked the furlough time. When computing vacation, sick leave, floating holiday and other accrual credits for employees taking furlough time, this provision shall supersede Sections 12.1, 13.2, 13.8 and 14.1 of this MOU regarding the computation of vacation, sick leave, floating holiday and other accrual credits as regards furlough time only. For payroll purposes, furlough time (absence without pay with prior authorization of the appointing authority) shall be reported separately from other absences without pay to the Auditor-Controller. SECTION 15 - JURY DUTY AND WITNESS DUTY 15.1 Jury Duty. For purposes of this Section, jury duty shall be defined as any time an employee is obligated to report to the court. When called for jury duty, County employees, like other citizens, are expected to discharge their jury duty responsibilities. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 138 Employees shall advise their department as soon as possible if scheduled to appear for jury duty. If summoned for jury duty in a Superior or Federal Court, or a Coroners jury, employees may remain in their regular County pay status, or they may take paid leave (vacation, floating holiday, etc.) or leave without pay and retain all fees and expenses paid to them. When an employee is summoned for jury duty selection or is selected as a juror in a Superior or Federal Court, employees may remain in a regular pay status if they waive all fees (other than mileage), regardless of shift assignment and the following shall apply: a. If an employee elects to remain in a regular pay status and waive or surrender all fees (other than mileage), the employee shall obtain from the Clerk or Jury Commissioner a certificate indicating the days attended and noting that fees other than mileage are waived or surrendered. The employee shall furnish the certificate to his/her department where it will be retained as a department record. No "Absence/Overtime Record" is required. b. An employee who elects to retain all fees must take leave (vacation, floating holiday, etc.) or leave without pay. No court certificate is required but an "Absence/Overtime Record" must be submitted to the department payroll clerk. Employees are not permitted to engage in any employment regardless of shift assignment or occupation before or after daily jury service that would affect their ability to properly serve as jurors. An employee on short notice standby to report to court, whose job duties make short notice response impossible or impractical, shall be given alternate work assignments for those days to enable them to respond to the court on short notice. When an employee is required to serve on jury duty, the County will adjust that employee's work schedule to coincide with a Monday to Friday schedule for the remainder of their service, unless the employee requests otherwise. Participants in 9/80 or 4/10 work schedules will not receive overtime or compensatory time credit for jury duty on their scheduled days off. Permanent-intermittent employees are entitled to paid jury duty leave only for those days on which they were previously scheduled to work. 15.2 Witness Duty. Employees called upon as a witness or an expert witness in a case arising in the course of their work or the work of another department may remain in their regular pay status and turn over to the County all fees and expenses paid to them other than mileage allowance or they may take vacation leave or leave without pay and retain all fees and expenses. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 139 Employees called to serve as witnesses in private cases or personal matters (e.g., accident suits and family relations) shall take vacation leave or leave without pay and retain all witness fees paid to them. Retention or waiver of fees shall be governed by the same provisions as apply to jury duty as set forth in Section 15.1 of this MOU. Employees shall advise their department as soon as possible if scheduled to appear for witness duty. Permanent intermittent employees are entitled to paid witness duty only for those days on which they were previously scheduled to work. SECTION 16 - MEDICAL, DENTAL, AND LIFE INSURANCE 16.1 Health Plan. The County will provide group health benefits through the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) for all permanent full-time employees, and permanent part-time employees regularly scheduled to work at least twenty (20) hours per week in classes represented by DAIA. The CalPERS health care program, as regulated by the Public Employees’ Medical and Hospital Care Act (PEMHCA), regulations issued pursuant to PEMHCA, and the administration of PEMHCA by CalPERS, controls on all health plan issues for employees who receive health care coverage from CalPERS, including, but not limited to, eligibility, benefit plans, benefit levels, minimum premium subsidies, and costs. 16.2 Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP). Because CCHP has met the minimum standards required under PEMHCA and is approved as an alternative CalPERS plan option, DAIA members and COBRA counterparts may elect to enroll in CCHP under the CalPERS plan rules and regulations. 16.3 CalPERS Health Plan Monthly Premium Subsidy. The County subsidy to the CalPERS monthly health plan premiums is as provided below. The employee must pay any CalPERS health plan premium costs that are greater than the County’s subsidy identified in Section 16.3. A. County Premium Subsidy On and After January 1, 2015. For the plan year that begins on January 1, 2015, the County will pay the following monthly premium subsidy for each health plan: Employee/Retiree/Survivor Only $608.87 Employee/Retiree/Survivor & One Dependent $1,217.74 Employee/Retiree/Survivor & Two or more Dependents $1,583.07 In addition, if there is an increase in the monthly premium charged by a health plan for 2015 that exceeds the above stated amounts, the County and the employee will each pay fifty percent (50%) of that increase. For each calendar year thereafter, the County and the employee will each pay fifty percent (50%) of any premium increase for each health plan. B. Effective January 1, 2015, in the first calendar year that a new health plan is AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 140 offered, the County monthly premium subsidy will be equal to the corresponding Kaiser monthly premium in the CalPERS region for that health plan. For each calendar year thereafter, the County and the employee will each pay fifty percent (50%) of the monthly premium increase that is above the plan premium for the first year of the new plan. C. In the event, in whole or in part, that the above County premium subsidy amounts are greater than one hundred percent (100%) of the applicable premium of any plan, for any plan year, the County’s contribution will not exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the applicable plan premium. 16.4 Dental Plan. The County may, during the term of this MOU, change dental care providers, so long as the level of benefits provided is not reduced. 16.5 County Dental Plan Premium Subsidy On and After January 1, 2016. The County’s subsidy to the monthly dental plan premiums shall be as provided below. This subsidy is provided only for permanent full-time and permanent part-time employees regularly scheduled to work at least twenty (20) hours per week. Permanent-intermittent and permanent part-time employees working less than twenty (20) hours per week may enroll in a dental plan but are not entitled to the County’s premium subsidy. Any increases in dental plan costs greater than the County’s premium subsidy identified below shall be borne by the employee. A. County premium subsidy for 2016 and thereafter. For calendar year 2016, the County will pay the following monthly premium subsidy: Dental Plans: Delta Dental Single $32.69 Family $73.64 DeltaCare (PMI) Single $22.30 Family $48.19 Delta Dental without health plan Single $42.44 Family $95.62 DeltaCare (PMI) without health plan Single $28.91 Family $62.49 In addition, if there is an increase in the monthly premium charged by a dental plan for 2016 that exceeds the above stated amounts, the County and the employee will each pay fifty percent (50%) of that increase. For each calendar year thereafter, the County and the employee will each pay fifty percent (50%) of any premium increase for each dental plan. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 141 B. If the County premium subsidy amounts are greater than one hundred percent (100%) of the applicable premium of any dental plan, for any plan year, the County’s contribution will not exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the applicable plan premium. C. Eligible Family Members. The following persons may be enrolled as the Eligible Family Members of a dental plan subscriber. 1. Eligible Dependents: a. Employee’s legal spouse b. Employee’s qualified domestic partner c. Employee’s Disabled Child who is: i. Over age 19, a). Unmarried; and b). Incapable of sustaining employment due to a physical or mental disability that existed prior to the child’s attainment of age 19. d. Delta Dental Only - Employee’s unmarried child who is: i. Under age 19; or ii. Age 19, or above, but under age 24; and a). Resides with the Employee for more than 50% of the year, excluding time living at school, and b). Receives at least 50% of support from Employee; and c). Is enrolled and attends school on a full-time basis, as defined by the school. e. Delta Care Only – Employee’s child to age 26. 2. “Employee’s child” includes natural child, step-child, adopted child, child of a qualified domestic partner, and a child specified in a Qualified Medical Child Support Order (QMSCO) or similar court document. 3. For purposes of this Section 16.5 – County Dental Plan Premium Subsidy On and After January 1, 2016 and Section 16.12 – Retirement Coverage, “Eligible Family Member” does not include Survivors of employees or retirees. 16.6 Orthodontia Coverage. The County will offer Orthodontia coverage to all permanent employees in classes represented by the DAIA who participate in a County dental plan. The cost for orthodontia coverage is borne 100% by each enrolled employee. Premium payments are made by payroll deduction or direct pay, as applicable. 16.7 Rate Information. The County Benefits Service Unit will make dental plan rate information and, to the extent possible, CalPERS health plan rate information available to employees and departments upon request. In addition, the County Benefits Service Unit will publish and distribute to employees and departments information about rate changes as they occur during the year. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 142 16.8 Life Insurance Benefit Under Health and Dental Plans. For permanent employees who are enrolled in a County sponsored health or dental plan as either the primary insured or a dependent, term life insurance in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) will be provided by the County. 16.9 Life Insurance Contributions. The County will pay the entire premium on behalf of permanent full-time and permanent part-time employees regularly scheduled to work at least twenty (20) hours per week who elect health and/or dental coverage. Permanent-intermittent and permanent part-time employees working less than twenty (20) hours per week may participate in the Life Insurance Plan at their full personal expense, which shall not exceed the County’s cost, provided they elect health and/or dental coverage. 16.10 Premium Payments. Employee participation in any health, dental, or life insurance plan is contingent upon the employee authorizing payroll deduction by the County of the employee’s share of the premium cost. The County's contribution to health plan and dental plan monthly premiums are payable as follows: A. CalPERS Plan (Includes Alternate CCHP Plan). The County's contribution to the health plan premium is payable one (1) month in advance. If an employee’s compensation in any month is not sufficient to pay the employee share of the premium, the employee must make up the difference by remitting the amount delinquent to the County by the tenth day of each month. The responsibility for this payment rests solely with the employee. B. Dental and Life Insurance Plans. The County's contribution to the dental and life insurance premium (as described in Sections 16.5 and 16.9) is payable monthly. If an employee’s compensation in any month is not sufficient to pay the employee share of the premium, the employee must make up the difference by remitting the amount delinquent to the County by the tenth day of each month. The responsibility for this payment rests solely with the employee. 16.11 Extended Coverage. An employee on approved leave without pay shall be allowed to continue his/her health/dental/life insurance coverage provided that the employee shall pay their share of the monthly premium by the tenth day of each month, during said leave. An employee who terminates County employment is covered through the last day of the month in which he/she is paid for County dental plans and through the last day of the month following the month of termination for CalPERS plans. Employees who terminate County employment may continue Group Health/Dental plan coverage to the extent provided under the COBRA regulations. 16.12 Retirement Coverage. A. Retirement Coverage. Upon retirement, employees and eligible family members may, subject to plan requirements, remain in the same County group medical and/or dental plan, if immediately before their retirement they are either AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 143 active subscribers to one of the County contracted health/dental plans, including CalPERS plans, or if while on authorized leave of absence without pay, they have retained continuous coverage during the leave period. B. Retirement Medical Coverage. Government Code section 22892 applies to all employees who retire under the Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Association (CCCERA). 16.13 Dual Coverage. A. CalPERS Health Plan. Employees must adhere to the rules as established by CalPERS. B. On and after January 1, 2013, each employee and retiree may be covered by only a single County health and/or a single County dental plan, including CalPERS plans. For example, a County employee may be covered under a single County health plan as either the primary insured or the dependent of another County employee or retiree, but not as both the primary insured and the dependent of another County employee or retiree. C. On and after January 1, 2013, each dependent may be covered by the health and/or dental plan of only one spouse or one domestic partner. For example, when both parents are County employees, all of their eligible children may be covered as dependents of either parent, but not both. D. For purposes of this Section 16.13 - Dual Coverage, "County" includes the County of Contra Costa and all Board of Supervisors governed special districts, such as the Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. 16.14 Health Care Spending Account. The County will continue to offer regular full- time and part-time (20/40 or greater) County employees the option to participate in a Health Care Spending Account (HCSA) Program designed to qualify for tax savings under Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code, but such savings are not guaranteed. The HCSA Program allows employees to set aside a pre-determined amount of money from their paycheck for health care expenses not reimbursed by any other health benefits plan with before-tax dollars. HCSA dollars can be expended on any eligible medical expenses allowed by Internal Revenue Code Section 125. Any unused balance is forfeited and cannot be recovered by the employee. 16.15 PERS Long Term Care. The County will deduct and remit monthly premium and eligible lists to the PERS Long Term Care Administrator, at no County administrative cost, for County employees who are eligible and voluntarily elect to purchase long term care through the PERS Long Term Care Program. The County further agrees that County employees interested in purchasing PERS Long Term Care may participate in meetings scheduled by PERS Long Term Care on County facilities during non-work hours (i.e. coffee breaks, lunch hour). AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 144 16.16 Dependent Care Assistance Program. The County will continue to offer the option of enrolling in a Dependent Care Assistance Program (DCAP) designed to qualify for tax savings under Section 129 of the Internal Revenue Code, but tax savings are not guaranteed. The program allows employees to set aside up to five thousand dollars ($5,000) of annual salary (before taxes) per calendar year to pay for eligible dependent care (child and elder care) expenses. Any unused balance is forfeited and cannot be recovered by the employee. 16.17 Premium Conversion Plan. The County will continue to offer the Premium Conversion Plan (PCP) designed to qualify for tax savings under Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code, but tax savings are not guaranteed. The program allows employees to use pre-tax dollars to pay medical and dental premiums. 16.18 Health Benefit Coverage for Employees Not Otherwise Covered. To access County health plans, an employee represented by the Association who is not otherwise eligible for health coverage by the County, must be eligible to receive an offer of coverage from the County under the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”). Employees eligible to receive an offer of coverage (and qualified dependents), will be offered access to the County’s lowest cost, single individual health insurance plan as determined by the County. Employees will be responsible for the full premium cost of coverage. This provision is not subject to the grievance process. 16.19 Prevailing Section. To the extent that any provision of this Section (Section 16 – Medical, Dental, and Life Insurance) is inconsistent with any provision of any other County enactment or policy, including but not limited to Administrative Bulletins, the Salary Regulations, the Personnel Management Regulations, or any other resolution or order of the Board of Supervisors, the provision(s) of this Section (Section 16 – Medical, Dental, and Life Insurance) will prevail. SECTION 17 - PROBATIONARY PERIOD 17.1 Duration. All appointments from officially promulgated employment lists for original entrance or promotion shall be subject to a probationary period. This period shall be from six (6) months to two (2) years duration. 17.2 Probation Periods Over Six Months. Listed below are those classes represented by the Association which have probation periods in excess of six (6) months: D.A. Inspector One (1) year D.A. Sr. Inspector One (1) year 17.3 Revised Probationary Period. When the probationary period for a class is changed, only new appointees to positions in the classification shall be subject to the revised probationary period. 17.4 Length of Probationary Period. The probationary period shall commence from the date of appointment. It shall not include time served in provisional or temporary AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 145 appointments or any period of continuous absence or industrial or non-industrial leave or temporary modified duty assignment exceeding fifteen (15) calendar days, except as otherwise provided in the Personnel Management Regulations or by law. For those employees appointed to permanent-intermittent positions with a six (6) months probation period, probation will be considered completed upon serving one thousand (1,000) hours after appointment except that in no instance will this period be less than six (6) calendar months from the beginning of probation. If a permanent- intermittent probationary employee is reassigned to full-time, credit toward probation completion in the full-time position shall be prorated on the basis of one hundred seventy-three (173) hours per month. 17.5 Rejection During Probation. An employee who is rejected during the probation period and restored to the eligible list shall begin a new probationary period if subsequently certified and appointed. A. Appeal from rejection. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this section, an employee (probationer) shall have the right to appeal from any rejection during the probationary period based on political or religious affiliations or opinions, union activities, or race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability or sexual orientation. B. The appeal must be written, must be signed by the employee and set forth the grounds and facts by which it is claimed that grounds for appeal exist under subsection (A) and must be filed through the Director of Human Resources to the Merit Board by 5:00 p.m. on the seventh (7th) calendar day after the date of delivery to the employee of notice of rejection. C. The Merit Board shall consider the appeal, and if it finds probable cause to believe that the rejection may have been based on grounds prohibited in subsection (A), it may refer the matter to a Hearing Officer for hearing, recommended findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision, pursuant to the relevant provisions of the Merit Board rules in which proceedings the rejected probationer has the burden of proof. D. If the Merit Board finds no probable cause for a hearing, it shall deny the appeal. If, after hearing, the Merit Board upholds the appeal, it shall direct that the appellant be reinstated in the position and the appellant shall begin a new probationary period unless the Merit Board specifically reinstates the former period. 17.6 Regular Appointment. The regular appointment of a probationary employee shall begin on the day following the end of the probationary period, subject to the condition that the Director of Human Resources receive from the appointing authority a statement in writing that the services of the employee during the probationary period were satisfactory and that the employee is recommended for permanent appointment. A probationary employee may be rejected at any time during the probation period without regard to the Skelly provisions of this MOU, without notice and without right of appeal or hearing. If the appointing authority has not returned the probation report, or the AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 146 appointing authority fails to submit in a timely manner the proper written documents certifying that a probationary employee has served in a satisfactory manner and later acknowledges it was his/her intention to do so, the regular appointment shall begin on the day following the end of the probationary period. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the MOU, an employee rejected during the probation period from a position in the Merit System to which the employee had been promoted or transferred from an eligible list, shall be restored to a position in the department from which the employee was promoted or transferred. An employee dismissed for other than disciplinary reasons within six (6) months after being promoted or transferred from a position in the Merit System to a position not included in the Merit System shall be restored to a position in the classification in the department from which the employee was promoted or transferred. A probationary employee who has been rejected or has resigned during probation shall not be restored to the eligible list from which the employee was certified unless the employee receives the affirmative recommendation from the appointing authority and is certified by the Human Resources Director whose decision is final. The Director of Human Resources shall not certify the name of a person restored to the eligible list to the same appointing authority by whom the person was rejected from the same eligible list, unless such certification is requested in writing by the appointing authority. 17.7 Layoff During Probation. An employee who is laid off during probation, if reemployed in the same class by the same department, shall be required to complete only the balance of the required probation. If reemployed in another department or in another classification, the employee shall serve a full probationary period. An employee appointed to a permanent position from a layoff or reemployment list is subject to a probation period if the position is in a department other than the department from which the employee separated, displaced, or voluntarily demoted in lieu of layoff. An appointment from a layoff or reemployment list is not subject to a probation period if the position is in the department from which the employee separated, displaced or voluntarily demoted in lieu of layoff. 17.8 Rejection During Probation of Laid Off Employee. An employee who has achieved permanent status in the class before layoff and who subsequently is appointed from the layoff list shall begin a new probation period if subsequently certified and appointed in a different department or classification than that from which the employee was laid off. If the employee is rejected during the probation period, the employee shall be automatically restored to the layoff list, unless discharged for cause, if the rejection occurs within the employee's period of layoff eligibility. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 147 SECTION 18 - PROMOTION 18.1 Competitive Exam. Promotion shall be by competitive examination unless otherwise provided in this MOU. 18.2 Promotion Policy. The Director of Human Resources, upon request of an appointing authority, shall determine whether an examination is to be called on a promotional basis. 18.3 Open Exam. If an examination for one of the classes represented by the Association is proposed to be announced on an Open Only basis the Director of Human Resources shall give five (5) days prior notice of such proposed announcement and shall meet at the request of the Association to discuss the reasons for such open announcement. 18.4 Promotion Via Reclassification Without Examination. Notwithstanding other provisions of this Section, an employee may be promoted from one classification to a higher classification and his/her position reclassified at the request of the appointing authority and under the following conditions: a. An evaluation of the position(s) in question must show that the duties and responsibilities have significantly increased and constitute a higher level of work. b. The incumbent of the position must have performed at the higher level for one (1) year. c. The incumbent must meet the minimum education and experience requirements for the higher class. d. The action must have approval of the Human Resources Director. e. The Association approves such action. The appropriate rules regarding probationary status and salary on promotion are applicable. 18.5 Requirements for Promotional Standing. In order to qualify for an examination called on a promotional basis, an employee must have probationary or permanent status in the merit system and must possess the minimum qualifications for the class. Applicants will be admitted to promotional examinations only if the requirements are met on or before the final filing date. If an employee who is qualified on a promotional employment list is separated from the merit system, except by layoff, the employee's name shall be removed from the promotional list. 18.6 Seniority Credits. Employees who have qualified to take promotional examinations and who have earned a total score, not including seniority credits, of seventy percent (70%) or more, shall receive, in addition to all other credits, five one- hundredths of one percent (.05%) for each completed month of service as a permanent AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 148 County employee continuously preceding the final date for filing application for said examination. For purposes of seniority credits, leaves of absence shall be considered as service. Seniority credits shall be included in the final percentage score from which the rank on the promotional list is determined. No employee, however, shall receive more than a total of five percent (5%) credit for seniority in any promotional examination. 18.7 Physical Examination. County employees who are required as part of the promotional examination process to take a physical examination, shall do so on County time at County expense. SECTION 19 - TRANSFER 19.1 Conditions. The following conditions are required in order to qualify for transfer: a. The position shall be in the same class, or if in a different class shall have been determined by the Director of Human Resources to be appropriate for transfer on the basis of minimum qualifications and qualifying procedure; b. the employee shall have permanent status in the merit system and shall be in good standing; c. the appointing authority or authorities involved in the transaction shall have indicated their agreement in writing; d. the employee concerned shall have indicated agreement to the change in writing. e. the Director of Human Resources shall have approved the change. Notwithstanding the foregoing, transfer may also be accomplished through the regular appointment procedure provided that the individual desiring transfer has eligibility on a list for a class for which appointment is being considered. 19.2 Procedure. Any employee or appointing authority who desires to initiate a transfer may inform the Director of Human Resources in writing of such desire stating the reasons therefore. The Director of Human Resources shall, if he/she considers that the reasons are adequate and that the transfer will be for the good of the County service and the parties involved, inform the appointing authority or authorities concerned and the employee of the proposal and may take the initiative in accomplishing the transfer. SECTION 20 - RESIGNATIONS An employee's voluntary termination of service is a resignation. Written resignations shall be forwarded to the Human Resources Department by the appointing authority immediately upon receipt, and shall indicate the effective date of termination. Oral resignation shall be immediately confirmed by the appointing authority in writing to the AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 149 employee and to the Human Resources Department and shall indicate the effective date of termination. 20.1 Resignation in Good Standing. A resignation giving the appointing authority written notice at least two (2) weeks in advance of the last date of service (unless the appointing authority requires a longer period of notice, or consents to the employee's terminating on shorter notice) is a resignation in good standing. 20.2 Constructive Resignation. A constructive resignation occurs and is effective when: a. An employee has been absent from duty for five (5) consecutive working days without leave, and; b. Five (5) more consecutive work days have elapsed without response by the employee after the mailing of a notice of resignation by the appointing authority to the employee at the employee's last known address. 20.3 Effective Resignation. A resignation is effective when delivered or spoken to the appointing authority, operative either on that date or another date specified. 20.4 Revocation. A resignation that is effective is revocable only by written concurrence of the employee and the appointing authority. 20.5 Coerced Resignations. a. Time Limit. A resignation which the employee believes has been coerced by the appointing authority may be revoked within seven (7) calendar days after its expression, by serving written notice on the Director of Human Resources and a copy on the appointing authority. b. Reinstatement. If the appointing authority acknowledges that the employee could have believed that the resignation was coerced, it shall be revoked and the employee returned to duty effective on the day following the appointing authority's acknowledgment without loss of seniority or pay. c. Contest. Unless, within seven (7) days of the receipt of the notice, the appointing authority acknowledges that the resignation could have been believed to be coerced, this question should be handled as an appeal to the Merit Board. In the alternative, the employee may file a written election with the Director of Human Resources waiving the employee's right of appeal to the Merit Board in favor of the employee's appeal rights under the grievance procedure contained in Section 22 – Grievance Procedure of the MOU beginning with Step C. d. Disposition. If a final decision is rendered that determines that the resignation was coerced, the resignation shall be deemed revoked and the employee returned to duty effective on the day following the decision but without loss of seniority or pay, subject to the employee's duty to mitigate damages. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 150 SECTION 21 - DISMISSAL, SUSPENSION, DEMOTION, TEMPORARY REDUCTION IN PAY & REDUCTION WITHIN CLASS 21.1 Cause for Action. The appointing authority may dismiss, suspend, demote, temporarily reduce the pay of, or reduce within class any employee for cause. The reduction in pay may not exceed five percent (5%) for a three (3) month period. The following are sufficient causes for such action; the list is indicative rather than inclusive of restrictions and dismissal, suspension, reduction or demotion may be based on reasons other than those specifically mentioned: a. absence without leave, b. conviction of any criminal act involving moral turpitude, c. conduct tending to bring the merit system and/or the Office of the District Attorney into disrepute, d. disorderly or immoral conduct, e. incompetence or inefficiency, f. insubordination, g. being at work under the influence of liquor or drugs, carrying onto the premises liquor or drugs or consuming or using liquor or drugs during work hours and/or on County premises, h. neglect of duty, (i.e. non-performance of assigned responsibilities), i. negligent or willful damage to public property or waste of public supplies or equipment, j. violation of any lawful or reasonable regulation or order given by a Supervisor or Department Head, k. willful violation of any of the provisions of the Merit System Ordinance or Personnel Management Regulations, l. material and intentional misrepresentation or concealment of any fact in connection with obtaining employment, m. misappropriation of County funds or property, n. unreasonable failure or refusal to undergo any physical, medical, and/or psychiatric exam and/or treatment authorized by this MOU, AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 151 o. dishonesty or theft, p. excessive or unexcused absenteeism and/or tardiness, q. sexual harassment, including but not limited to unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, or physical conduct of a sexual nature, when such conduct has the purpose or effect of affecting employment decisions concerning an individual, or unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance, or creating an intimidating and hostile working environment. 21.2 Skelly Requirements - Notice of Proposed Action (Skelly Notice). Before taking a disciplinary action to dismiss, suspend, for more than five (5) work days (four (4) work days for employees on 4/10 work week), demote, temporarily reduce the pay of, or reduce within class an employee, the appointing authority shall cause to be served personally or by certified mail, on the employee, a Notice of Proposed Action, which shall contain the following: a. A statement of the action proposed to be taken. b. A copy of the charges; including the acts or omissions and grounds upon which the action is based. c. If it is claimed that the employee has violated a rule or regulation of the County, department or district, a copy of said rule shall be included with the notice. d. A statement that the employee may review and request copies of materials upon which the proposed action is based. e. A statement that the employee has seven (7) calendar days to respond to the appointing authority either orally or in writing. 21.3 Employee Response. The employee upon whom a Notice of Proposed Action has been served shall have seven (7) calendar days to respond to the appointing authority either orally or in writing before the proposed action may be taken. Upon request of the employee and for good cause, the appointing authority may extend in writing the period to respond. If the employee's response is not filed within seven (7) days or during any extension, the right to respond is lost. 21.4 Leave Pending Employee Response. Pending response to a Notice of Proposed Action within the first seven (7) days or extension thereof, the appointing authority for cause specified in writing may place the employee on temporary leave of absence, with pay. 21.5 Suspensions Without Pay. Suspensions without pay shall not exceed thirty (30) days unless ordered by an arbitrator, an adjustment board or the Merit Board. The AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 152 thirty (30) day limit does not apply to suspension due to pending criminal charges as provided in 21.6 below. 21.6 Procedure on Dismissal, Suspension, Reduction Within Class, Temporary Reduction in Pay, or Disciplinary Demotion. a. In any disciplinary action to dismiss, suspend, reduce within class, temporarily reduce the pay of, or demote an employee having permanent status in a position in the merit system after having complied with the Skelly requirements where applicable, the appointing authority shall make an order in writing stating specifically the causes for the action. b. Service of Order. Said order of dismissal, suspension, reduction within class, temporary reduction of pay, or demotion shall be filed with the Director of Human Resources, showing by whom and the date a copy was served upon the employee to be dismissed, suspended, reduced within class or demoted, either personally or by certified mail to the employee's last known mailing address. The order shall be effective either upon personal service or deposit in the U.S. Postal Service. c. Employee Appeals from Order. The employee may appeal an order of dismissal, suspension, demotion, temporary reduction of pay, or reduction within class either to the Merit Board or through the procedures of Section 22 - Grievance Procedure of this MOU provided that such appeal is filed in writing with the Human Resources Director within ten (10) calendar days after service of said order. An employee may not both appeal to the Merit Board and file a grievance under Section 22 of this MOU. SECTION 22 - GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 22.1 Definition. A grievance is any dispute which involves the interpretation or application of any provision of this MOU excluding, however, those provisions of this MOU which specifically provide that the decision of any County official shall be final, the interpretation or application of those provisions not being subject to the grievance procedure. The Association may represent the employee at any stage of the process. Grievances must be filed within thirty (30) days of the incident or occurrence about which the employee claims to have a grievance and shall be processed in the following manner: Step 1. Any employee or group of employees who believes that a provision of this MOU has been misinterpreted or misapplied to his/her detriment shall discuss the complaint with the employee's immediate supervisor, who shall meet with the employee within five (5) days of receipt of a written request to hold such meeting. Step 2. If a grievance is not satisfactorily resolved in Step 1 above, the employee may submit the grievance in writing within ten (10) work days to such management official as the Department Head may designate. This formal written grievance shall state which provision of the MOU has been misinterpreted or misapplied, how misapplication or AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 153 misinterpretation has affected him/her to his/her detriment, and the redress he/she seeks. A copy of each written communication on a grievance shall be filed with the Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee. The Department Head or his/her designee shall have ten (10) work days in which to respond to the grievance in writing. Step 3. If a grievance is not satisfactorily resolved in Step 2 above, the employee may appeal in writing within seven (7) work days to the Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee. The Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee shall have twenty (20) work days in which to investigate the merit of the complaint and to meet with the Department Head and the employee and attempt to settle the grievance and respond in writing. Step 4. No grievance may be processed under this Step 4 which has not first been filed and investigated in accordance with Step 3 above and filed within seven (7) work days of the written response of the Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee. If the parties are unable to reach a mutually satisfactory accord on any grievance which arises and is presented during the term of this MOU, such grievance shall be submitted in writing within seven (7) work days to an Adjustment Board comprised of three (3) Association representatives, no more than two (2) of whom shall be either an employee of the County or an elected or appointed official of the Association presenting this grievance, and three (3) representatives of the County, no more than two (2) of whom shall be either an employee of the County or a member of the staff or an organization employed to represent the County in the meeting and conferring process. The Adjustment Board shall meet and render a decision within twenty (20) work days of receipt of the written request. Step 5. If an Adjustment Board is unable to arrive at a majority decision, either the employee (or the County, when alleging a violation of Section 22.5) may require that the grievance be referred to an impartial arbitrator who shall be designated by mutual agreement between the employee and the Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee. Such request shall be submitted within twenty (20) work days of the rendering of the Adjustment Board decision. Within twenty (20) days of the request for arbitration the parties shall mutually select an arbitrator. The fees and expenses of the arbitrator and of the Court Reporter shall be shared equally by the employee and the County. Each party, however, shall bear the costs of its own presentation, including preparation and post hearing briefs, if any. 22.2 Time Limits. The time limits specified above may be waived by mutual agreement of the parties to the grievance. If the County fails to meet the time limits specified in steps 1 through 3 above, the grievance will automatically move to the next step. If an employee fails to meet the time limits specified in steps 1 through 4 above, the grievance will be deemed to have been settled and withdrawn. 22.3 Notice. An official, with whom a formal grievance is filed by a grievant who is included in a unit represented by the Association, but is not represented by the Association in the grievance, shall give the Association a copy of the formal presentation. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 154 22.4 Compensation Complaints. All complaints involving or concerning the payment of compensation shall be initially filed in writing with the Employee Relations Officer or his/her designee. Only complaints which allege that employees are not being compensated in accordance with the provisions of this MOU shall be considered as grievances. Any other matters of compensation are to be resolved in the meeting and conferring process, if not detailed in the MOU which results from such meeting and conferring process shall be deemed withdrawn until the meeting and conferring process is next opened for such discussion. No adjustment shall be retroactive for more than two (2) years from the date upon which the complaint was filed. No change in this MOU or interpretations thereof (except interpretations resulting from Adjustment Board proceedings hereunder) will be recognized unless agreed to by the County and the Association. 22.5 Strike/Work Stoppage. During the term of this MOU, the Association, its members and representatives, agree that it and they will not engage in, authorize, sanction, or support any strike, slowdown, stoppage of work, sickout, or refuse to perform customary duties. 22.6 Merit Board. a. All grievances of employees in representation units represented by the Association shall be processed under Section 22 unless the employee elects to apply to the Merit Board on matters within its jurisdiction. b. No action under Step 3 and Step 4 of Subsection 22.1 above shall be taken if action on the complaint or grievance has been taken by the Merit Board, or if the complaint or grievance is pending before the Merit Board. 22.7 Filing by Association. The Association may file a grievance at Step 3 on behalf of affected employees when action by the County Administrator or the Board of Supervisors violates a provision of this MOU. SECTION 23 - RETIREMENT 23.1 Payment of Employee Contributions. Effective on April 1, 2012 employees are responsible for the payment of one hundred percent (100%) of the employees’ basic retirement benefit contributions determined annually by the Board of Retirement of the Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Association without the County paying any part of the employees’ contribution. Employees are also responsible for the payment of the employees’ contributions to the retirement cost of living program as determined annually by the Board of Retirement without the County paying any part of the employees’ contributions. 23.2 Safety Employees Retirement – Tier A - Employees Hired or Re-hired Before January 1, 2013. For County employees hired or re-hired by the County before January 1, 2013, or who are hired after that date but are not new members under PEPRA, and who are safety members of CCCERA, the retirement formula shall be “3 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 155 percent at 50.” The cost of living adjustment (COLA) to the retirement allowance shall not exceed three percent (3%) per year. The employee’s final compensation shall be calculated based on a twelve (12) month salary average. This retirement benefit is known as Tier A. Effective July 1, 2012, each such employee in Tier A shall pay three percent (3%) of his/her retirement base to pay part of the employer’s contribution for the cost of this retirement benefit. “Retirement base” means base salary and other payments, such as salary differential and flat rate pay allowances, used to compute retirement benefits. Effective June 30, 2016, the payment of the 3% that the employee pays of his/her retirement base to pay part of the employer’s contribution for the cost of Safety Tier A will cease. 23.3 Thirty (30) Year Employees. Through the term of this Memorandum of Understanding and any extensions thereof, an Association member with credit for more than 30 years of continuous service as a safety member shall not make payments from his/her retirement base to pay part of the employer’s contribution for the cost of Safety Tier A. 23.4 Safety Retirement Benefit – Sworn Employees who become New Members of CCCERA on or after January 1, 2013. A. For sworn employees who, under PEPRA, become safety New Members of the Contra Costa County Employee Retirement Association (CCCERA) on or after January 1, 2013, retirement benefits are governed by the California Public Employees Pension Reform Act of 2013 (PEPRA), (Chapters 296, 297, Statutes of 2012). To the extent this Agreement conflicts with any provision of PEPRA, PEPRA will govern. B. PEPRA Safety Option Plan Two (2.7% @ 57) applies to these employees who, under PEPRA, become New Members of CCCERA. For these employees, the cost of living adjustment to the retirement allowance will not exceed two percent (2%) per year, and the cost of living adjustment will be banked. 23.5 Re-opener – Election of Safety PEPRA Tier by Employees Hired on or Before December 31, 2012. If either the Internal Revenue Service issues guidance acceptable to both parties, or the County receives a Private Letter Ruling from the IRS that protects the County and DAIA members hired prior to January 1, 2013 from additional tax liability if these employees have the opportunity to elect to enter the new Safety PEPRA Tier, then the County and the Association agree to reopen this agreement to meet and confer on 1) the possibility of allowing these employees to elect to enter the Safety Retirement PEPRA Tier , 2) seeking State Legislation to authorize these employees to make such an election, and 3) the process by which these employees would be able to elect to enter the Safety PEPRA Tier if the enabling legislation is enacted. Any changes to this agreement in these subject matter areas will occur only upon the written agreement of the parties. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 156 SECTION 24 - SAFETY The County shall expend every effort to see to it that the work performed under the terms and conditions of this MOU is performed with a maximum degree of safety consistent with the requirement to conduct efficient operations. SECTION 25 - MILEAGE The mileage allowance for the use of personal vehicles on County business shall be paid according to the rates allowed by the Internal Revenue Service and shall be adjusted to reflect changes in this rate on the date it becomes effective or the first of the month following announcement of the changed rate by the Internal Revenue Service, whichever is later. SECTION 26 - PAY WARRANT ERRORS If an employee receives a pay warrant which has an error in the amount of compensation to be received and if this error occurred as a result of a mistake by the Auditor-Controller's Department, it is the policy of the Auditor-Controller's Department that the error will be corrected and a new warrant issued within forty-eight (48) hours, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and holidays from the time the department is made aware of and verifies that the pay warrant is in error. Pay errors discovered by the County in employee pay shall be corrected as soon as possible as to current pay rate but that no recovery of either overpayments or underpayments to an employee shall be made retroactively except for the six (6) month period immediately preceding discovery of the pay error. This provision shall apply regardless of whether the error was made by the employee, the appointing authority or designee, the Director of Human Resources or designee, or the Auditor-Controller or designee. Recovery of fraudulently accrued over or underpayments are excluded from this section for both parties. A repayment schedule will be no longer than three times (3) the length of time the overpayment occurred. SECTION 27 - PERSONNEL FILES An employee shall have the right to inspect and review any official record(s) relating to his/her performance as an employee or to a grievance concerning the employee which is kept or maintained by the County in the employee's personnel file in the Human Resources Department or in the employee's personnel file in their department. The contents of such records shall be made available to the employee for inspection and review at reasonable intervals during the regular business hours of the County. The County shall provide an opportunity for the employee to respond in writing to any information which is in the employee's personnel file about which he/she disagrees. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 157 Such response shall become a permanent part of the employee's personnel record. The employee shall be responsible for providing the written responses to be included as part of the employee's official personnel file. This section does not apply to the records of an employee relating to the investigation of a possible criminal offense, medical records and information or letters of reference. All documents pertaining to disciplinary actions shall be placed in an official personnel file maintained by the Human Resources Department or in an official personnel file maintained by their department. Copies of written reprimands or memoranda pertaining to an employee's unsatisfactory performance which are to be placed in the employee's personnel file shall be given to an employee who shall have the right to respond in writing to said documents. Letters of Reprimand are subject to the grievance procedure but shall not be processed past Step 3 unless said letters are used in a subsequent discharge, suspension, reduction within class or demotion of the employee. Copies of letters of commendation which are to be placed in the employee's personnel file will be given to the employee. Employees have the right to review their official personnel files which are maintained in the Human Resources Department or by their department. In a case involving a grievance or disciplinary action, the employee's designated representative may also review his/her personnel file with specific written authorization from the employee. SECTION 28 - SERVICE AWARDS The County shall continue its present policy with respect to service awards including time off; provided, however, that the type of award given shall be at the sole discretion of the County. SECTION 29 - REIMBURSEMENT FOR MEAL EXPENSES Employees shall be reimbursed for meal expenses under the following circumstances and in the amount specified: a. When the employee is required to be out of his/her regular or normal work area during a meal hour because of a particular work assignment and with prior approval of the Department Head or his/her designee. b. When the employee is required to stay over to attend consecutive or continuing afternoon and night sessions of a Board or Commission. c. When the employee is required to incur expenses as host for official guests of the County, work as members of examining boards, official visitors, and speakers or honored guests at banquets or other official functions. d. When the employee is required to work three (3) or more hours of overtime; in this case he/she may be reimbursed in accordance with the Administrative Bulletin on Expense Reimbursement. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 158 Meal costs will be reimbursed only when eaten away from home or away from the facility in the case of employees at 24-hour institutions. Procedures and definitions relative to reimbursement for meal expenses shall be in accordance with the Administrative Bulletin on Expense Reimbursement. SECTION 30 - COMPENSATION FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO PERSONAL PROPERTY The loss or damage to personal property of employees is subject to reimbursement under the following conditions: a. The loss or damage must result from an event which is not normally encountered or anticipated on the job and which is not subject to the control of the employee. b. Ordinary wear and tear of personal property used on the job is not compensable. c. Employee tools or equipment provided without the express approval of the Department Head and automobiles are excluded from reimbursement. d. The loss or damage must have occurred in the line of duty. e. The loss or damage was not a result of negligence or lack of proper care by the employee. f. The personal property was necessarily worn or carried by the employee in order to adequately fulfill the duties and requirements of the job. g. The loss or damage to an employee's dentures or other prosthetic devices did not occur simultaneously with a job connected injury covered by workers' compensation. h. The amount of reimbursement shall be limited to the actual cost to repair damages. Reimbursement for items damaged beyond repair shall be limited to the actual value of the item at the time of loss or damage but not more than the original cost. I. The burden of proof of loss rests with the employee. j. Claims for reimbursement must be processed in accordance with the Administrative Bulletin on Compensation for Loss or Damage to Personal Property. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 159 SECTION 31 - UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE Either the County or the Association may file an unfair labor practice as defined in Chapter 34-22 of the Board of Supervisors Resolution 81/1165 against the other. Allegations of an unfair labor practice, if not resolved in discussions between the parties, may be heard by a mutually agreed upon impartial third party. SECTION 32 - LENGTH OF SERVICE DEFINITION (for service awards and vacation accruals) The length of service credits of each employee of the County shall date from the beginning of the last period of continuous County employment (including temporary, provisional, and permanent status, and absences on approved leave of absence). When an employee separates from a permanent position in good standing and within two (2) years is reemployed in a permanent County position, or is reemployed in a permanent County position from a layoff list within the period of layoff eligibility, service credits shall include all credits accumulated at time of separation, but shall not include the period of separation. The Human Resources Director shall determine these matters based on the employee status records in the Human Resources Department. SECTION 33 - PERMANENT PART-TIME EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Permanent part-time employees receive prorated vacation and sick leave benefits. They are eligible for health, dental and life insurance benefits at corresponding premium rates providing they work at least fifty percent (50%) of full time. If the employee works at least fifty percent (50%) of full time, County retirement participation is also included. SECTION 34 - PERMANENT-INTERMITTENT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Permanent-intermittent employees are eligible for prorated vacation and sick leave benefits. SECTION 35 - PROFESSIONAL REIMBURSEMENT The County agrees to reimburse employees in the District Attorney Investigators' Unit for actual cost of membership dues in job-related professional associations, job-related equipment, professional publications, training and software and hardware from a standardized County approved list provided each employee in the District Attorney Investigators' Unit complies with the provisions of the Computer Use and Security Policy adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Effective January 1, 2007 the maximum amount will be increased to three-hundred dollars ($300) per calendar year. Reimbursement in the amount prescribed above will be processed upon presentation of a verified receipt to the Auditor-Controller's Office showing payment of annual AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 160 membership dues in job-related professional associations, or purchase of job-related equipment, professional publications, training or software and hardware and evidence of supervisor approval. SECTION 36 - SAFETY EQUIPMENT a. The County agrees to continue to provide newly hired Inspectors with all required safety equipment. Said equipment shall remain the property of the County; b. Safety equipment owned by the County deemed unserviceable by the District Attorney or his/her authorized representative shall be turned over to the County and a replacement shall be furnished by the District Attorney or his/her authorized representative; c. The provisions of this replacement program do not apply to safety equipment damaged or otherwise rendered unserviceable as a result of employee negligence, subject to the provisions of Section 3802 of the California Labor Code; d. The District Attorney or his/her designated representative retains the right to render final decisions on the serviceability of safety equipment. e. The District Attorney's Office will provide District Attorney Inspectors and Senior District Attorney Inspectors an appropriate "turn out" jacket. SECTION 37 - DEPENDENT CARE a. Dependent Care Information & Referral Service. The County will administer an Information & Referral Service through the Contra Costa Child Care Council for the duration of this MOU. b. Dependent Care Salary Contribution. Subject to the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Service, employees may contribute up to $5,000 each calendar year from their salaries for approved dependent care; only eligible employees may contribute for such expenses; there is no County contribution for dependent care. Reimbursements are made on a monthly basis subject to submission of itemized statements, adequate accumulation of the salary contribution, proof of payment, and applicable County administrative procedures. SECTION 38 - BILINGUAL PAY A salary differential shall be paid incumbents of positions requiring bilingual proficiency as designated by the appointing authority and Director of Human Resources. The differential shall be one hundred nine dollars ($109) per month effective the first of the AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 161 month following the month this Memorandum of Understanding is adopted by the Board of Supervisors. Said differential shall be paid to eligible employees in paid status for any portion of a given month. Designation of positions for which bilingual proficiency is required is the sole prerogative of the County. If during the term of this MOU, the County increases the Bilingual Pay for other bargaining units, the County will extend that increase to the DAIA bargaining unit members. The increase will be implemented on prospective basis only and will not be subject to retroactivity. SECTION 39 - ADOPTION The provisions of this MOU shall be made applicable on the dates indicated and upon approval by the Board of Supervisors. Resolutions and Ordinances, where necessary, shall be prepared and adopted in order to implement these provisions. It is understood that where it is determined that an Ordinance is required to implement any of the foregoing provisions, said provisions shall become effective upon the first day of the month following thirty (30) days after such Ordinance is adopted. SECTION 40 - SCOPE OF AGREEMENT & SEPARABILITY OF PROVISION 40.1 Scope of Agreement. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, this MOU fully and completely incorporates the understanding of the parties hereto and constitutes the sole and entire agreement between the parties in any and all matters subject to meet and confer. Any past side letters or any other agreements that are not incorporated into or attached to this MOU are deemed expired upon approval of this MOU by the Board of Supervisors. The Association understands and agrees that the County is not obligated to meet and confer regarding wages, hours or conditions of employment during the term of this extended agreement, except as otherwise required by law. 40.2 Separability of Provisions. Should any section, clause or provision of this MOU be declared illegal, unlawful or unenforceable, by final judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidation of such section, clause or provision shall not invalidate the remaining portions hereof, and such remaining portions shall remain in full force and effect for the duration of this MOU. 40.3 Personnel Management Regulations. Where a specific provision contained in a section of this MOU conflicts with a specific provision contained in a section of the Personnel Management Regulations, the provision of this MOU shall prevail. It is recognized, however, that certain provisions of the Personnel Management Regulations may be supplementary to the provisions of this MOU or deal with matters not within the scope of representation and as such remain in full force and effect. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 162 40.4 Duration of Agreement. This Agreement will continue in full force and effect from July 1, 2016 to and including June 30, 2019. Said Agreement shall automatically renew from year to year thereafter unless either party gives written notice to the other prior to sixty (60) days from the aforesaid termination date of its intention to amend, modify or terminate the Agreement. DATE: ____________________ Contra Costa County: DAIA: (Signature / Printed Name) (Signature / Printed Name) / / / / / / / / / / AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 163 DISTRICT ATTORNEY INVESTIGATORS’ ASSOCIATION ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT A CLASS & SALARY LISTING ATTACHMENT B PROJECT POSITIONS AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 164 ATTACHMENT A Job Code Class Title Flex Staff (F) / Deep Class (D)From To 6KVA DA SR INSPECTOR $7,233 $10,013 6KVD DA SR INSPECTOR WELFARE FRAUD $7,233 $10,013 6KWF DA INSPECTOR-WELFARE FRAUD $6,278 $8,691 All classes are designated as safety Salary Range District Attorney Investigators' Association CLASS AND SALARY LISTING Effective 8/1/2016 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 165 ATTACHMENT B AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 166 DISTRICT ATTORNEY INVESTIGATORS’ ASSOCIATION SUBJECT INDEX Accrual During Leave Without Pay (Sick Leave) ............................................... 31 Accrual During Leave Without Pay (Vacation Leave) ........................................ 24 Accrual on Prorated Basis ................................................................................. 24 Administration of Sick Leave ............................................................................. 27 Adoption ............................................................................................................ 61 Advance Notice ................................................................................................... 6 Anniversary Dates ............................................................................................... 9 Appeal of Denial ................................................................................................ 37 Assignment of Classes to Bargaining Units ......................................................... 6 Association Recognition ...................................................................................... 4 Association Representatives ............................................................................... 8 Association Security ............................................................................................ 4 Attendance at Meetings ....................................................................................... 7 Automated Time Keeping .................................................................................. 23 Bilingual Pay ...................................................................................................... 60 CalPERS Health Plan Monthly Premium Subsidy ............................................. 39 Cause for Action ................................................................................................ 50 Cell Phones ....................................................................................................... 17 Coerced Resignations ....................................................................................... 49 Communicating With Employees ......................................................................... 5 Compensation Complaints ................................................................................ 54 Compensation for Loss or Damage to Personal Property ................................. 58 Compensation for Portion of Month ................................................................... 10 Compensatory Time .......................................................................................... 15 Competitive Exam ............................................................................................. 47 Constructive Resignation ................................................................................... 49 Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) .................................................................... 39 County Dental Plan Premium Subsidy On and After January 1, 2016 ............... 40 Court Appearance Overtime .............................................................................. 17 Credits to and Charges Against Sick Leave ...................................................... 25 Days and Hours of Work ................................................................................... 14 Definition (Grievance Procedure) ...................................................................... 52 Definitions ............................................................................................................ 2 Definitions (Days and Hours of Work) ............................................................... 14 Dental Plan ........................................................................................................ 40 Dependent Care ................................................................................................ 60 Dependent Care Assistance Program ............................................................... 44 Disability ............................................................................................................ 28 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 167 Dismissal, Suspension, Demotion, Temporary Reduction In Pay & Reduction Within Class ...................................................... 50 Dual Coverage ................................................................................................... 43 Dues Authorization Form ..................................................................................... 4 Dues Deduction ................................................................................................... 4 Duration (Probationary Period) .......................................................................... 44 Duration of Agreement ...................................................................................... 62 Effective Resignation ......................................................................................... 49 Employee Response ......................................................................................... 51 Entrance Salary ................................................................................................... 9 Extended Coverage ........................................................................................... 42 Family Care or Medical Leave (FMLA) .............................................................. 32 Filing by Association .......................................................................................... 54 Furlough Days Without Pay ............................................................................... 37 General Administration – Leaves of Absence .................................................... 32 General Wages .................................................................................................... 8 Grievance Procedure ......................................................................................... 52 Group Health Plan Coverage............................................................................. 35 Health Benefit Coverage for Employees Not Otherwise Covered ...................... 44 Health Care Spending Account ......................................................................... 43 Health Plan ........................................................................................................ 39 Holiday is WORKED and Holiday Falls on Regularly Scheduled Work Day (for employees on a Regular Work Schedule, the Holiday always falls on the employees regularly scheduled Work day) .................................................. 23 Holidays ............................................................................................................. 22 Holidays Observed ............................................................................................ 22 Holidays Observed – Full-Time Employees ....................................................... 22 Holidays Observed – Part-Time Employees ...................................................... 23 Immediate Family (Sick Leave) ......................................................................... 25 Increments Within Range .................................................................................. 10 Integration of SDI ............................................................................................... 31 Jury Duty ........................................................................................................... 37 Jury Duty and Witness Duty .............................................................................. 37 Layoff ................................................................................................................. 17 Layoff During Probation ..................................................................................... 46 Leave of Absence .............................................................................................. 32 Leave Pending Employee Response ................................................................. 51 Leave Without Pay ............................................................................................ 32 Leave Without Pay – Use of Accruals ............................................................... 35 Length of Probationary Period ........................................................................... 44 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 168 Length of Service Definition (for service awards and vacation accruals) ........... 59 Life Insurance Benefit Under Health and Dental Plans ...................................... 42 Life Insurance Contributions .............................................................................. 42 Longevity ............................................................................................................. 9 Maintenance of Membership ............................................................................... 5 Meal Expenses .................................................................................................. 58 Medical, Dental, and Life Insurance .................................................................. 39 Medical Leave ................................................................................................... 33 Merit Board ........................................................................................................ 54 Mileage .............................................................................................................. 56 Military Leave .................................................................................................... 36 No Discrimination ................................................................................................ 7 Notice (Grievance Procedure) ........................................................................... 53 Notice (Seniority, Workforce Reduction, Layoff & Reassignment) ..................... 21 Official Representatives ....................................................................................... 7 On-Call/Call Back .............................................................................................. 17 Open Exam........................................................................................................ 47 Orthodontia Coverage ....................................................................................... 41 Overtime ............................................................................................................ 15 Overtime and Compensatory Time .................................................................... 15 Overtime And Straight Time Compensatory Time ............................................. 15 Part-Time Compensation ................................................................................... 10 Payment ............................................................................................................ 14 Payment of Employee Contributions ................................................................. 54 Pay for Work in Higher Classification ................................................................ 13 Pay Warrant Errors ............................................................................................ 56 Permanent Part-Time Employee Benefits ......................................................... 59 Permanent-Intermittent Employee Benefits ....................................................... 59 Personal Property Reimbursement .................................................................... 58 PERS Long Term Care ...................................................................................... 43 Personnel Files .................................................................................................. 56 Personnel Management Regulations ................................................................. 61 Physical Examination ........................................................................................ 48 Policies Governing the Use of Paid Sick Leave ................................................. 25 Position Reclassification .................................................................................... 11 Pregnancy Disability Leave ............................................................................... 35 Premium Conversion Plan ................................................................................. 44 Premium Payments ........................................................................................... 42 Prevailing Section .............................................................................................. 44 Probation Periods Over Six Months ................................................................... 44 Probationary Period ........................................................................................... 44 Procedure .......................................................................................................... 49 Procedure on Dismissal, Suspension, Reduction Within Class, Temporary Reduction in Pay, or Disciplinary Demotion .................................... 52 Professional Reimbursement............................................................................. 59 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 169 Promotion .......................................................................................................... 47 Promotion Policy ................................................................................................ 47 Promotion Via Reclassification Without Examination ........................................ 47 Purpose of Sick Leave ....................................................................................... 25 Rate Information ................................................................................................ 41 Reassignment of Laid Off Employees ............................................................... 22 Regular Appointment ......................................................................................... 45 Reimbursement for Meal Expenses ................................................................... 57 Rejection During Probation ................................................................................ 45 Rejection During Probation of Laid Off Employee ............................................. 46 Release Time ...................................................................................................... 8 Release Time for Training ................................................................................... 8 Re-opener – Election of Safety PEPRA Tier By Employee’s Hired on or Before December 31, 2012 ............................................................. 55 Requirements for Promotional Standing ............................................................ 48 Resignation in Good Standing ........................................................................... 49 Resignations ...................................................................................................... 49 Retirement ......................................................................................................... 55 Retirement Coverage ........................................................................................ 43 Return From Leave of Absence ......................................................................... 36 Revised Probationary Period ............................................................................. 45 Revocation......................................................................................................... 50 Safety ................................................................................................................ 56 Safety Employees Retirement – Tier A – Employee’s Hired Or Re-Hired Before January 1, 2013 ....................................................... 54 Safety Equipment .............................................................................................. 60 Safety Retirement Benefit-Sworn Employees who become New Members of CCCERA on or after January 1, 2013 ................................... 55 Salaries ............................................................................................................... 8 Salary on Involuntary Demotion ......................................................................... 12 Salary on Promotion .......................................................................................... 12 Salary on Voluntary Demotion ........................................................................... 12 Salary Reallocation & Salary on Reallocation ................................................... 11 Salary Review While on Leave of Absence ....................................................... 37 Scope of Agreement .......................................................................................... 61 Scope of Agreement & Separability of Provision ............................................... 61 Seniority Credits ................................................................................................ 48 Seniority, Workforce Reduction, Layoff & Reassignment .................................. 17 Separability of Provisions .................................................................................. 61 Separation Through Layoff ................................................................................ 18 Service Awards .................................................................................................. 57 Sick Leave ......................................................................................................... 25 Skelly Requirements – Notice of Proposed Action (Skelly Notice) .................... 51 Special Employment Lists ................................................................................. 21 State Disability Insurance (SDI) ......................................................................... 32 Straight Time Pay .............................................................................................. 15 Strike/Work Stoppage ........................................................................................ 54 Suspensions Without Pay .................................................................................. 51 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 170 Thirty (30) Year Employees (Retirement) .......................................................... 55 Time Limits (Grievance Procedure) ................................................................... 53 Time Reporting and Pay Practices Waiver ........................................................ 14 Time Reporting/Time Stamping ......................................................................... 14 Transfer ............................................................................................................. 48 Transfer (Salaries) ............................................................................................. 12 Unauthorized Absence ...................................................................................... 37 Unfair Labor Practice ......................................................................................... 59 Use of County Buildings ...................................................................................... 6 Vacation ............................................................................................................ 23 Vacation Accrual Rates ..................................................................................... 23 Vacation Allowance ........................................................................................... 23 Vacation Allowance for Separated Employees .................................................. 24 Vacation Leave .................................................................................................. 23 Vacation Leave on Reemployment from a Layoff List ....................................... 24 Wages ................................................................................................................. 8 Withdrawal of Membership .................................................................................. 5 Witness Duty ..................................................................................................... 38 Workers’ Compensation .................................................................................... 30 Workforce Reduction ......................................................................................... 17 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 171 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/488 to provide for salary increases and one-time lump sum payment for specified unrepresented sworn positions to parallel those in the new District Attorney Investigators' Association Memorandum of Understanding for the period July 1, 2016 and beyond. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, the cost of these actions will be absorbed by the Departments utilizing these classifications. The majority of the fiscal impact is the associated wage increase for temporary employees. The actual cost is depend upon the use of these non-permanent employees. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County has historically tied unrepresented sworn classes to represented classes in the District Attorney Investigators' Association for purposes of salary increases and decreases. The Board of Supervisors recently adopted a new memorandum of understanding with the District Attorney Investigators' Association that includes wage increases. The District Attorney's Office employs a number of unrepresented sworn temporary employees. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Lisa Lopez, Assistant Director of Human Resources, Harjit S. Nahal, Assistant County Auditor D.10 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:General Salary Increases for Specified Unrepresented Sworn Employees AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 172 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > Resolution No. 2016/488 provides for the following: The base rate of pay for the classifications of DA Chief of Inspectors-Exempt (6KD1), DA Director of Forensic & Technical Services (6KDC), DA Lieutenant of Inspectors (6KNB), and the DA Lieutenant of Inspectors-Welfare Fraud (6KWG) will be increased as follows: 1. Effective August 1, 2016, five percent (5.0%) Effective August 1, 2016, permanent full-time employees, employed by the County on August 1, 2016 in one of the classifications listed above, will be paid a one-time lump sum payment of four hundred and thirty-five dollars ($435) Effective July 1, 2017, four and one-half percent (4.5%) Effective July 1, 2018, four and one-half percent (4.5%) Effective August 1, 2016, temporary employees, employed by the County on August 1, 2016 in one of the classifications listed below, will be paid a one-time lump sum payment of four hundred and thirty-five dollars ($435): 2. DA Senior Inspector (6KVA) DA Senior Inspector-Welfare Fraud (6KVD) DA Inspector-Welfare Fraud (6KWF) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County could be detrimentally impacted by the potential loss of highly-trained sworn personnel and it may become more difficult to attract candidates for promotion. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/488 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/488 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 173 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/488 In The Matter Of: Providing for Salary Increases for Specified Unrepresented Sworn Employees WHEREAS the County of Contra Costa has maintained historic salary ties between sworn unrepresented and represented classifications; and WHEREAS the District Attorney Investigators' Association has recently negotiated a new Memorandum of Understanding including wage increases; The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors acting solely in its capacity as the Governing Board of the County of Contra Costa RESOLVES THAT: The base rate of pay for the classifications of DA Chief of Inspectors-Exempt (6KD1), DA Director of Forensic & Technical Services (6KDC), DA Lieutenant of Inspectors (6KNB), and the DA Lieutenant of Inspectors-Welfare Fraud (6KWG) will be increased as follows: 1. Effective August 1, 2016, five percent (5.0%) Effective August 1, 2016, permanent full-time employees, employed by the County on August 1, 2016 in one of the classifications listed above, will be paid a one-time lump sum payment of four hundred and thirty-five dollars ($435) Effective July 1, 2017, four and one-half percent (4.5%) Effective July 1, 2018, four and one-half percent (4.5%) Effective August 1, 2016, temporary employees, employed by the County on August 1, 2016 in one of the classifications listed below, will be paid a one-time lump sum payment of four hundred and thirty-five dollars ($435): 2. DA Senior Inspector (6KVA) DA Senior Inspector-Welfare Fraud (6KVD) DA Inspector-Welfare Fraud (6KWF) Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Lisa Lopez, Assistant Director of Human Resources, Harjit S. Nahal, Assistant County Auditor 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 174 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES175 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/486, approving the side letter between Contra Costa County and California Nurses Association to modify Section 7.2., Compensatory Time, of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Contra Costa County and California Nurses Association. FISCAL IMPACT: The modification to compensatory time is an administrative change with little or no fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The County and California Nurses Association agree to modify Section 7.2., Compensatory Time, of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Contra Costa County and California Nurses Association. In summary, the modification allows employees represented by CNA to periodically elect to accrue compensatory time off in lieu of call-back pay. Eligible employees who elect to receive compensatory time off for call-back must agree to do so for a full fiscal year (July 1 through June 30). The employee must notify their department payroll staff in writing of any change in the election by May 31 of each year. Employees who become eligible (i.e., newly hired APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Enid Mendoza, Senior Deputy County Administrator, Andrew Dadko, Labor Representative/CNA, William Walker, Health Services Department D.11 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution No. 2016/486 California Nurses Association Side Letter - Compensatory Time Modification AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 176 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > employees, employees promoting, demoting, etc.) for call-back compensatory time after May 31 of each year will be paid for authorized time until the next notification period. For the 2016/17 partial fiscal year, election must be made by August 31 and may begin September 1, 2016. Health Services Administration will alert employees of the new compensatory time election procedures. Adoption of this Side Letter settles the existing grievance filed by CNA on April 25, 2016 regarding Compensatory Time Election. The terms of this Side Letter will be incorporated into the next MOU between the County and CNA. Except as specifically amended or excluded by this Side Letter, all other terms and conditions of the MOU between Contra Costa County and California Nurses Association (August 1, 2014 – December 31, 2017) remain unchanged by this Side Letter. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Employees will not be able to choose compensatory time rather than pay for call-back time. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/486 CNA Side Letter dated 7-21-16 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/486 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 177 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/486 In The Matter Of: Approving the Side Letter between Contra Costa County and California Nurses Association to modify Section 7.2., Compensatory Time, of the Memorandum of Understanding The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors acting in its capacity as Governing Board of the County of Contra Costa and all districts of which it is the ex-officio governing Board RESOLVES THAT: Effective following approval of the Board of Supervisors, the attached Side Letter of Agreement dated July 21, 2016, between Contra Costa County and California Nurses Association be ADOPTED. Contact: Lisa Driscoll, County Finance Director (925) 335-1023 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: Enid Mendoza, Senior Deputy County Administrator, Andrew Dadko, Labor Representative/CNA, William Walker, Health Services Department 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 178 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES179 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 180 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 181 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE plans for the Kirker Pass Road Crash Cushion Replacement at Nortonville Road, as recommenced by the Public Works Director, Pittsburg area. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Local Road Funds. BACKGROUND: The purpose of this work is to replace the existing crash cushion located at the end of the concrete median barrier on Kirker Pass Road at its intersection with Nortonville Road. The work will replace the existing crash cushion with a new SCI Smart Cushion in the same location. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The crash cushion will not be replaced. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Brian Louis, 925-313-7039 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 1 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE plans for the Kirker Pass Road Crash Cushion Replacement at Nortonville Road AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 182 ATTACHMENTS Kirker Pass Road Crash Cushion at Nortonville Road AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 183 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 184 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 185 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/470 accepting completion of improvements for road acceptance RA06-01208 (cross-reference subdivision SD04-08856) for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The developer has completed the improvements per the Road Improvements Agreement and in accordance with the Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The completion of improvements will not be accepted. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: R. Hutchins, Records, S. Reed, Design/Construction, Chris Lau, C. Halford, Mapping, L. Lorentini, Engineering Services, Jorge Hernandez, L. Brown, Finance, C. Low, City of San Ramon C. 4 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Accept completion of public improvements for road acceptance RA06-01208, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 186 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/470 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/470 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 187 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/470 IN THE MATTER OF: Accepting completion of improvements for road acceptance RA06-01208 (cross-reference subdivision SD04 -08856) for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) The Public Works Director has notified this Board that the improvements in road acceptance RA06-01208 have been completed as provided in the Road Improvement Agreement with Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, heretofore approved by this Board in conjunction with the filing of the Subdivision Map. WHEREAS, these improvements are approximately located along ‘new’ Doughetry Road, near Bollinger Canyon Road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the road improvements have been COMPLETED as of August 2, 2016 thereby establishing the six-month terminal period for the filing of liens in case of action under said Road Improvement Agreement: DATE OF AGREEMENT: November 18, 2008 NAME OF SURETY: National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the payment (labor and materials) surety for $5,642,700.00, Bond No. 929390933 issued by the above surety be RETAINED for the six-month lien guarantee period until February 2, 2017, at which time the Board AUTHORIZES the release of said surety less the amount of any claims on file. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Dougherty Road for the hereinafter described public improvements, as shown and dedicated on the Offer of Dedication for Roadway Purposes accepted for recordation on May 24, 2016, (Resolution No. 2016/376) by this Board, are ACCEPTED AS COMPLETE. Road Name: Dougherty Road Length (miles): 0.33 Road/ROW Width: 142’ System: Arterial BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon acceptance by the Board of Supervisors, the San Ramon City Council shall accept the improvements for maintenance and ownership in accordance with the Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the beginning of the warranty period is hereby established, and the $112,900.00 cash deposit (Auditor’s Deposit Permit No. DP468993, dated August 16, 2006) made by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and the performance/maintenance surety bond rider for $1,579,910.00, Bond No. 929390933 issued by National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford be RETAINED pursuant to the requirements of Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code until release by this Board. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 188 Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: R. Hutchins, Records, S. Reed, Design/Construction, Chris Lau, C. Halford, Mapping, L. Lorentini, Engineering Services, Jorge Hernandez, L. Brown, Finance, C. Low, City of San Ramon AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 189 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES190 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/472 accepting completion of improvements for road acceptance RA06-01210 (cross-reference subdivision SD04-08856) for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The developer has competed the public improvements in accordance with the Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The completion of improvements will not be accepted. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: R. Hutchins, Records, S. Reed, Design/Construction, Chris Lau, C. Halford, Mapping, L. Lorentini, Engineering Services, J. Hernandez, Engineering Services, L. Brown, Finance, C. Low, City of San Ramon C. 6 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Accept completion of public improvements for road acceptance RA06-01210, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 191 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/472 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/472 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 192 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/472 IN THE MATTER OF: Accepting completion of improvements for road acceptance RA06-01210 (cross-reference subdivision SD04-08856) for a project developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) The Public Works Director has notified this Board that the improvements in road acceptance RA06-01210 (cross-reference subdivision SD04-08856) have been completed. WHEREAS, these improvements are located along ‘new’ Dougherty Road, near Bollinger Canyon Road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the road improvements have been COMPLETED as of August 2, 2016, thereby establishing the six-month terminal period for the filing of liens in case of action under the Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty: DATE OF AGREEMENT: August 2, 2016 NAME OF SURETY: Western Surety Company BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the payment (labor and materials) surety for $6,315,500.00, Bond No. 58735832 issued by the above surety be RETAINED for the six-month lien guarantee period until February 2, 2017, at which time the Board AUTHORIZES the release of said surety less the amount of any claims on file. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Dougherty Road for the hereinafter described public improvements, as shown and dedicated on the Offer of Dedication for Roadway Purposes, accepted for recordation on May 24, 2016 (Resolution No. 2016/376) by this Board, are ACCEPTED AS COMPLETE. Road Name: Dougherty Road Length (miles): 1.00 Road/ROW Width: 142’ System: Arterial BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon acceptance by the Board of Supervisors, the San Ramon City Council shall accept the improvements for maintenance and ownership in accordance with the Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the beginning of the warranty period is hereby established, and the $127,000.00 cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. DP689558, dated July 16, 2015 and Auditor's Deposit Permit No. DP715383, dated July 18, 2016) made by Toll Brothers, Inc., and the performance/maintenance surety bond for $1,767,650.00, Bond No. 58735832 issued by Western Surety Company be RETAINED pursuant to the requirements of Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code until release by this Board. I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 193 Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: R. Hutchins, Records, S. Reed, Design/Construction, Chris Lau, C. Halford, Mapping, L. Lorentini, Engineering Services, J. Hernandez, Engineering Services, L. Brown, Finance, C. Low, City of San Ramon AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 194 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES195 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/475 accepting completion of improvements for road acceptance RA12-01249 (cross-reference subdivision SD04-08856) for a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The developer has completed the public improvements in accordance with the Title 9 of the Country Ordinance Code. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The completion of improvements will not be accepted. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: R. Hutchins, Records, S. Reed, Design/Construction, Chris Lau, C. Halford, Mapping, L. Lorentini, Engineering Services, J. Hernandez, Engineering Services, L. Brown, Finance C. 8 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Accept completion of public improvements for road acceptance RA12-01249, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 196 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/475 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/475 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 197 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/475 IN THE MATTER OF: Accepting completion of improvements for road acceptance RA12-01249 (cross-reference subdivision SD04-08856) for a project developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) The Public Works Director has notified this Board that the improvements in road acceptance RA12-01249 (cross-reference subdivision SD04-08856) have been completed. WHEREAS, these improvements are located along ‘new’ Dougherty Road near Bollinger Canyon Road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the road improvements have been COMPLETED as of August 2, 2016 thereby establishing the six-month terminal period for the filing of liens in case of action under the Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty: DATE OF AGREEMENT: August 2, 2016 NAME OF SURETY: Western Surety Company BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the payment (labor and materials) surety for $1,247,500.00, Bond No. 58735833 issued by the above surety be RETAINED for the six-month lien guarantee period until February 2, 2017, at which time the Board AUTHORIZES the release of said surety less the amount of any claims on file. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Dougherty Road for the hereinafter described public improvements, as shown and dedicated on the Offer of Dedication for Roadway Purposes, accepted for recordation on March 3, 2015 (Resolution No. 2015/59) by this Board, are ACCEPTED AS COMPLETE. Road Name: Dougherty Road Length (miles): 0.30 Road/ROW Width: 142’ System: Arterial BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon acceptance by the Board of Supervisors, the San Ramon City Council shall accept the improvements for maintenance and ownership in accordance with the Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the beginning of the warranty period is hereby established, and the $25,000.00 cash deposit (Auditor's Deposit Permit No. DP660482, dated June 5, 2014) made by Toll Brothers, Inc. and the performance/maintenance surety bond for $349,250.00, Bond No. 58735833 issued by Western Surety Company be RETAINED pursuant to the requirements of Section 94-4.406 of the Ordinance Code until release by this Board. Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 198 Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: R. Hutchins, Records, S. Reed, Design/Construction, Chris Lau, C. Halford, Mapping, L. Lorentini, Engineering Services, J. Hernandez, Engineering Services, L. Brown, Finance AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 199 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES200 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/464 accepting completion of the warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement, and release of cash deposit for faithful performance for subdivision SD08-09245, a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Developer Fees. The funds to be released are developer fees that have been held on deposit. BACKGROUND: The public road improvements have met the guaranteed performance standards for the warranty period following completion and acceptance of the improvements. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The developer will not receive a refund of the cash deposit, the Subdivision Agreement and performance/maintenance surety bond will not be exonerated, and the billing account will not be liquidated and closed. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: S. Reed, Design/Construction, L. Lorentini, Engineering Services, C. Sumpter, C. Sumpter, C. Low, City of San Ramon C. 3 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Accept completion of warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement for subdivision SD08-09245, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 201 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/464 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/464 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 202 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/464 IN THE MATTER OF accepting completion of warranty period for the Subdivision Agreement, and release of cash deposit for faithful performance for subdivision SD08-09245, a project developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) WHEREAS, on October 28, 2014, this Board resolved that the improvements in subdivision SD08-09245 were completed as provided in the Subdivision Agreement with Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and now on the recommendation of the Public Works Director; The Board hereby FINDS that the improvements have satisfactorily met the guaranteed performance standards for the period following completion and acceptance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is AUTHORIZED to: REFUND the $23,000.00 cash deposit (Auditor’s Deposit Permit No. DP629652, dated April 18, 2013) plus interest to Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, in accordance with Government Code Section 53079, if appropriate, Ordinance Code Section 94-4.406, and the subdivision agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon completion of the warranty and maintenance period, the San Ramon City Council shall accept the civil improvements for maintenance in accordance with the Dougherty Valley Memorandum of Understanding. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the warranty period has been completed and the Subdivision Agreement and surety bond, Bond No. 929569043, dated July 9, 2013, issued by The Continental Insurance Company, are EXONERATED. Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: S. Reed, Design/Construction, L. Lorentini, Engineering Services, C. Sumpter, C. Sumpter, C. Low, City of San Ramon 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 203 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES204 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/471 approving the Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty for road acceptance RA06-01210 (cross-reference SD04-08856), a project being developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal improvement. BACKGROUND: Improvements have been reviewed and processed by Public Works staff and meets all conditions of approval and County requirements. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty will not be approved. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: S. Reed, Design/Construction, L. Lorentini, Engineering Services, C. Low, City of San Ramon, J. Hernandez, Engineering Services C. 5 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve the Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty for road acceptance RA06-01210, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 205 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/471 RA06-1210 Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/471 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 206 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/471 IN THE MATTER OF: Approving the Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty for road acceptance RA06-01210 (cross-reference SD04-08856), a project being developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. WHEREAS, these improvements are approximately located along ‘new’ Dougherty Road, near Bollinger Canyon Road. The following document was presented for Board approval for road acceptance RA06-01210 (cross-reference SD04-08856) property located in the San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area, Supervisorial District II. A Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty with Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, principal, whereby said principal agrees to warrant all improvements, as required in said Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty, for one year from the date of said agreement. Improvements generally consist of road and street improvements, tract drainage, street signs, and all other public improvements. Said document was accompanied by security to guarantee the warranty of road improvements, as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: 1. Cash Bond Performance Amount: $127,000.00 Auditor’s Deposit Permit No.: DP689558 Date: July 16, 2015 Auditor’s Deposit Permit No.: DP715383 Date: July 18, 2016 Submitted by: Toll Brothers, Inc. 2.Surety Bond Bond Company: Western Surety Company Bond No.: 58735832 Date: July 14, 2016 Performance Amount: $1,767,650.00 Labor & Materials Amount: $6,315,5000.00 Principal: Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty is APPROVED. All deposit permits are on file with the Public Works Department. 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 207 Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: S. Reed, Design/Construction, L. Lorentini, Engineering Services, C. Low, City of San Ramon, J. Hernandez, Engineering Services AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 208 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES209 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 210 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 211 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 212 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 213 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 214 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 215 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 216 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 217 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 218 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/460 approving the second extension of the Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS00-00003, for a project being developed by Ony Homes, LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (District II) FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: The terminal date of the Subdivision Agreement needs to be extended. The developer has not completed the required improvements and has requested more time. (Approximately 95% of the work has been completed to date.) By granting an extension, the County will give the developer more time to compete his improvements and keeps the bond current. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The terminal date of the Subdivision Agreement will not be extended and the developer will be in default of the agreement, requiring the County to take legal action against the developer and surety to get the improvements installed, or revert the development to acreage. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: J. LaRocque, S. Reed, Design/Construction, C. Sumpter C. 2 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve the second extension of the Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS00-00003, Alamo area. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 219 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/460 MS00-00003 SD Agreement Extension MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/460 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 220 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/460 IN THE MATTER OF approving the second extension of the Subdivision Agreement for minor subdivision MS00-00003, for project being developed by Ony Homes LLC, as recommended by the Public Works Director, Alamo area. (Districts II) WHEREAS the Public Works Director having recommended that she be authorized to execute the second agreement extensions which extends the Subdivision Agreement between Ony Homes LLC and the County for construction of certain improvements in minor subdivision MS00-00003, Alamo area, through June 17, 2017. APPROXIMATE PERCENTAGE OF WORK COMPLETE: 95% ANTICIPATED DATE OF COMPLETION: October 2017 BOND NO.: 724970 S DATE: March 21, 2014 REASON FOR EXTENSION: Developer is installing required improvements and needs additional time to complete said improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommendation of the Public Works Director is APPROVED. Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: J. LaRocque, S. Reed, Design/Construction, C. Sumpter 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 221 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 222 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 223 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 224 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 225 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES226 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/473 approving the Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty, for road acceptance RA12-01249 (cross-reference SD04-08856) for a project being developed by Shapell Homes, a Division of Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Improvements have been reviewed and processed by Public Works staff and meets all conditions of approval and County requirements. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty will not be approved. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: S. Reed, Design/Construction, L. Lorentini, Engineering Services, J. Hernandez, Engineering Services, C. Low, City of San Ramon C. 7 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approving the Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty for road acceptance RA12-01249, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 227 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/473 RA06-1249 Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/473 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 228 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/473 IN THE MATTER OF: Approving the Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty for road acceptance RA12-01249 (cross-reference SD04-08856), a project being developed by Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as recommended by the Public Works Director, San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area. (District II) WHEREAS, these improvements are approximately located along ‘new’ Dougherty Road, near Bollinger Canyon Road. The following document was presented for Board approval road acceptance RA12-01249 (cross-reference SD04-08856) property located in the San Ramon (Dougherty Valley) area, Supervisorial District II. A Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty with Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, principal, whereby said principal agrees to warrant all improvements, as required in said Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty, for one year from the date of said agreement. Improvements generally consist of road and street improvements, tract drainage, street signs, and all other public improvements. Said document was accompanied by security to guarantee the warranty of road improvements, as required by Title 9 of the County Ordinance Code, as follows: 1. Cash Bond Performance Amount: $25,000.00 Auditor’s Deposit Permit No.: DP660482 Date: June 5, 2014 Submitted by: Toll Brothers, Inc. 2. Surety Bond Bond Company: Western Surety Company Bond No.: 58735833 Date: July 14, 2016 Performance Amount: $349,250.00 Labor & Materials Amount: $1,247,500.00 Principal: Shapell Industries, Inc., a Delaware Corporation NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Road Improvement Agreement for Improvement Warranty is APPROVED. All deposit permits are on file with the Public Works Department. Contact: Jocelyn LaRocque, 925-313-2315 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 229 By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: S. Reed, Design/Construction, L. Lorentini, Engineering Services, J. Hernandez, Engineering Services, C. Low, City of San Ramon AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 230 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES231 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 232 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 233 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 234 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 235 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 236 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 237 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 238 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 239 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 240 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT an access easement from the City of Oakley conveying to the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District the right to access the portion of the Marsh Creek Channel located adjacent to Warhol Way in the City of Oakley (Project No. 7521-6D8325 [SCH#: 2001122073]) DIRECT the Real Estate Division of the Public Works Department to record the above referenced Access Easement in the Office of the County Clerk-Recorder. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: Prior to construction APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Olivia Reynolds, (925) 313-2306 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 9 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Accept an Access Easement from the City of Oakley regarding the Cypress Grove Development Project AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 241 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of the Cypress Grove Development Project, the District had an access road to the Marsh Creek Channel (Channel) located off E. Cypress Road, on the north side of the railroad tracks. The developer was allowed to remove the access road and build a new trail along Warhol Way to connect to the East Bay Regional Parks District (EBRPD) trail/District Maintenance Road along the Channel, with the understanding that the District would have access to the Channel north of the railroad tracks by using Warhol Way. It is now necessary for the District to acquire an access easement from the City over the trail from Warhol way to the Channel. On October 6, 2004, the County Board of Supervisors adopted the previously certified City of Oakley’s Final Environmental Impact Report for the project. SCH # 2001122073. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The District will not have sufficient access rights to maintain Marsh Creek. ATTACHMENTS Access Easement, Cypress Grove Dev., Oakley AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 242 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 243 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 244 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 245 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 246 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 247 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 248 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 249 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 250 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute amendment number 1 to the Consulting Services Agreement with Stantec Architecture, Inc., effective July 1, 2016, to increase the payment limit by $100,000 to a new payment limit of $350,000, to continue providing on-call landscape architect services to complete existing projects, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Federal, State, Local, and/or General Funds. BACKGROUND: On March 31, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved a contract with Stantec Architecture, Inc. to provide on-call landscape architect services. Due to the nature of on-call work and unknown conditions in the field, costs that were not originally anticipated were incurred. Special Districts staff recommends increasing the payment limit by $100,000 to a new payment limit of $350,000. Amending the payment limit would allow the Consultant to complete existing projects and provide the County the flexibility to cover any further unexpected costs. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without Board approval, the Consultant will not be able to continue providing on-call landscape architect services to complete existing projects. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Susan Cohen, (925) 313-2160 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 11 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE a contract amendment with Stantec Architecture, Inc. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 251 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, to execute on behalf of the Director of Airports, a Purchase Order amendment with Ascent Aviation Group, Inc., to increase the payment limit by $125,000 for a new total of $430,000 for aviation fuel through August 31, 2016. Byron Area. FISCAL IMPACT: The Airport Enterprise Fund will cover the purchase costs and the Airport will then resell the fuel to Byron tenants and other users to generate income. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County Airports is responsible for an aviation self-serve fueling facility at Byron Airport that supports aviation fuel needs for its tenants and visiting aircraft. On August 25, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved a purchase order in the amount of $230,000, permitting purchase of fuel from Ascent Aviation Group, Inc. for resell. On June 7, 2016, the Board approved an increase in the purchase order from $230,000 to $305,000, to permit the purchase of additional fuel to meet user demand. Sales to date for 2016 (January to June) are 50% higher than the same period in 2015 due in part to more competitive pricing. As such, more fuel has been purchased than estimated making the current purchase order amount insufficient through its expiration date of August 31, 2016. In order to ensure supply through August, the purchase order needs to be increased by $125,000, to a new total amount of $430,000. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Beth Lee, (925) 681-4200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 12 To:Board of Supervisors From:Keith Freitas, Airports Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve increase to purchase order with Ascent Aviation Group Inc. for aviation fuel at the Byron Airport AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 252 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the purchase order amendment is not approved, the County will no longer be able to buy aviation fuel and there will be a disruption of needed aviation fuel service at the Byron Airport for tenants and customers. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 253 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the Notice of Intention to Convey Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) property, identified as a former access road along the Marsh Creek Channel and adjacent to Subdivision Nos. 8678, 8679 and 8680, to the City of Oakley (City), in connection with the Cypress Grove Development (Project), pursuant to Government Code Section 25365 and F.C.D. Act, Section 31. (Project No.: 7521-6D8325) DECLARE that this Board will meet on September 13, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. or thereafter, in the Board’s Chambers, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, to consummate the conveyance. DIRECT the Real Estate Division of the Public Works Department to publish the NOI in the East Bay Times pursuant to Government Code Section 6061. FISCAL IMPACT: No Fiscal Impact. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Olivia D. Reynolds, (925) 313-2306 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 10 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Notice of Intention to Convey Real Property to City of Oakley AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 254 BACKGROUND: This Project is located just northeast of the intersection of E. Cypress Road and the Marsh Creek Channel and consisted of three subdivisions, 8678, 8679 and 8680. As part of the overall construction of the Project, E. Cypress Road was widened to the north into District right of way, over Marsh Creek and just to the east of the Marsh Creek Channel. As a result of the construction, the former access road adjacent to the subdivisions needs to be transferred to the City to complete the right of way transactions associated with this Project. On October 6, 2004, the County Board of Supervisors adopted the previously certified City of Oakley’s Final Environmental Impact Report for the project. SCH # 2001122073. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The District will be responsible for maintaining the property. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Notice of Intention-Cypress Grove MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Notice of Intention-Cypress Grove AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 255 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF INTENTION TO CONVEY REAL PROPERTY The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, as the Governing Board of the Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, declares its intention to convey to the City of Oakley the following described real property located in the City of Oakley adjacent to the Cypress Grove Development: A former access road along the Marsh Creek Channel is adjacent to Subdivision Nos. 8678, 8679, and 8680. The real property is described in more detail in Exhibits “A-1, “A-2” and “A-3” and shown on Exhibits “B-1”, “B-2” and “B-3”, which are available for review at the Public Works Department, 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez, CA 94553. The Board will meet on September 13, 2016, at 9:00 a.m., or thereafter, in its Chambers, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, California, to consummate the conveyance to the City of Oakley. ATTESTED: David Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator By , Deputy \\PW-DATA\grpdata\realprop\Cypress Grove - Oakley\BO.01A - NOI - Cypress Grove.doc AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 256 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES257 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Airports to terminate a month-to-month T-Hangar and Shade Hangar Rental Agreement dated September 7, 2012, between the County and Equipco Sales & Service for a T-Hangar at the Buchanan Field Airport. AUTHORIZE County Counsel to pursue legal action, Concord Area. FISCAL IMPACT: The Airport Enterprise Fund will cover the cost of any legal action. BACKGROUND: License Requirements; FAA Requirements In September 2012, the County entered into a T-Hangar and Shade Hangar Rental Agreement (Agreement) with Equipco Sales & Service (Tenant) for use of T-Hangar #E-18, which is located on the East Ramp of Buchanan Field Airport. Under the terms of the Agreement, the hangar may only be used to (i) store Tenant’s aircraft, (ii) refurbishTenant’s aircraft, (iii) store materials directly related to the storage or restoration of Tenant’s aircraft, (iv) store Tenant’s aircraft and a boat, recreation vehicle, motorcycle, or automobile, or (v) store Tenant’s aircraft and small comfort items, such as a couch, small refrigerator, etc. The limitation on the use of the hangar is intended to ensure that the hangar is used for activities that involve, or are directly related to, the operation of an aircraft. This limitation is consistent with requirements imposed on the County by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The FAA provides financial assistance, including grants, to general aviation airports like Buchanan Field Airport. As APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Beth Lee, (925) 681-4200 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 13 To:Board of Supervisors From:Keith Freitas, Airports Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:AUTHORIZE TERMINATION OF T-HANGAR AND SHADE HANGAR RENTAL AGREEMENT AT BUCHANAN FIELD AIRPORT; AUTHORIZE LEGAL ACTION TO REGAIN POSSESSION AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 258 a recipient of FAA grants, the County must comply with FAA requirements known as grant assurances. If the County fails to comply with the grant assurances, the County is at risk of being denied future grants from the FAA and of having to repay grants it has already received. One grant assurance limits non-aeronautical use of hangars. Non-aeronautical use of a hangar is allowed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 259 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) only if there is no current aviation need and the proposed use is (i) a short-term occupancy, (ii) the occupant pays the market rate for a non-aeronautical use, and (iii) the occupant is required to vacate the premises if an aeronautical user expresses an interest in using the hangar. Evidence of Non-Compliant Use After receiving a complaint in October 2015 that the hangar was being used for non-aviation purposes, County staff conducted a number of inspections of the hangar. Inspections were conducted on November 4, 2015, March 8, 2016 and June 28, 2016. Those inspections revealed that the hangar is not being used to store an aircraft; it is being used to store other items. In fact, there is no room in the hangar for an aircraft, given the amount of other items stored in the hangar. After each inspection, Tenant was given time to bring its use of the hangar into compliance. Under the terms of the Agreement, Tenant must store an aircraft in the hangar. In the absence of an aircraft, storage of anything else is not allowed. Based on the results of each inspection, County staff has concluded that Tenant’s use of the hangar does not comply with the terms of the license or the FAA requirements. Airport staff is requesting authority to terminate the Agreement and to pursue legal action to regain possession of the hangar. Such actions are consistent with adopted Airport policies. In addition, by recovering possession of the Premises, the Airport will be able to make the space available to the next person on the Buchanan Field Airport T-Hangar waiting list. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to terminate the Agreement and pursue legal action against Tenant would result in the Airport being unable to enforce adopted Airport policies and procedures and could put future FAA grant funding at risk. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 260 RECOMMENDATION(S): DENY claims filed by David Chavez, Eli Dominguez, Deborah Haagensen, Mary R. Johnson DDS, Steven Ray Kitchen, Peter Korwin, Colleen Maramonte, a minor, by her father & guardian Alan Maramonte, and Denise M. Smullen. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: * APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Joellen Balbas 925-335-1906 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 15 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Claims AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 261 RECOMMENDATION(S): RECEIVE this report concerning the final settlement of Cecily Buda and AUTHORIZE payment from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund in an amount not to exceed $235,000, less settlement advances. FISCAL IMPACT: Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund payment of $235,000 less settlement advances. BACKGROUND: Attorney Benjamin Tolentino, defense counsel for the County, has advised the County Administrator that within authorization an agreement has been reached settling the workers' compensation claim of Cecily Buda vs. Contra Costa County Fire Protection District. The Board's July 19, 2016 closed session vote was: Supervisor Gioia, Andersen, Piepho and Glover - Yes; Supervisor Mitchoff - Absent. This action is taken so that the terms of this final settlement and the earlier July 19, 2016 closed session vote of his Board authorizing its negotiated settlement are known publicly. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Case will not be settled. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharon Hymes-Offord 925.335.1453 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 14 To:Board of Supervisors From:Sharon Offord Hymes, Risk Manager Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Settlement of Claim, Cecily Buda vs Contra Costa County Fire Protection District AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 262 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Lauri 957-8860 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 16 To:Board of Supervisors From:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Resolution Honoring the 56th Annual Contra Costa Championship Swim Meet AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 263 AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/463 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Resolution No. 2016/463 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 264 In the matter of:Resolution No. 2016/463 recognizing the 56th Annual Contra Costa Championship Swim Meet in Lafayette. Whereas, on August 13 & 14, 2016, Contra Costa County will hold its annual Championship Swim Meet at the Steve Heaston Aquatic Center at Acalanes High School in Lafayette; and Whereas, the County meet brings together all the top swimmers from the County’s recreational Swim Clubs; and Whereas, each swimmer must beat a challenging time to qualify to swim in an individual event, it is an honor for swimmers to become eligible to swim in this meet; and Whereas, this County-wide event is sponsored by and run by the Lafayette Moraga Youth Association, a not for profit community sports organization, and the proceeds support the Lafayette Moraga Youth Association Dolphins Swim Team; and Whereas, each year this championship meet brings together all the top swimmers from the County’s recreational swim clubs; and Whereas, this has become the premiere recreation swim meet in Contra Costa County. Now, Therefore, Be It Resolved that the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County is proud to recognize and congratulate all of the swimmers and volunteers who make the 56th Annual Contra Costa County Swim Meet a success. ___________________ CANDACE ANDERSEN Chair, District II Supervisor ______________________________________ JOHN GIOIA MARY N. PIEPHO District I Supervisor District III Supervisor ______________________________________ KAREN MITCHOFF FEDERAL D. GLOVER District IV Supervisor District V Supervisor I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, By: ____________________________________, Deputy AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 265 C.16 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 266 RECOMMENDATION(S): INTRODUCE Ordinance No. 2016-17 calling a special election for voter approval of a 30-year countywide transportation transaction and use tax and consolidating the special election with the statewide general election on November 8, 2016, WAIVE reading, and FIX August 9, 2016 for adoption. FISCAL IMPACT: The Authority will reimburse the County for all costs of conducting this election. BACKGROUND: Ordinance No. 2016 -17 calls a special election for the purpose of submitting a 30-year countywide transportation transaction and use tax (sales tax) to the voters of Contra Costa County, pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 180201 et seq. and Revenue and Taxation Code section 7291, as requested by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (Authority). The ordinance also consolidates the special election with the statewide general election on November 8, 2016. Over the past several months, the Authority has undertaken actions necessary to have a measure placed on the November 2016 general election ballot that would establish an additional one-half of one percent sales tax for transportation purposes to meet the growing needs of Contra Costa County. If the tax passes, the revenues will supplement an existing one-half of one percent local transportation sales tax implemented by Measure C in 1988, which was extended until March 31, 2034 by Measure J in 2004. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: County Counsel? I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 17 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Introduction of an Ordinance Calling for a Special Election for a Local Sales Tax for Transportation Improvements and Growth Management AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 267 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) > As required by Public Utilities Code section 180206, the Authority prepared a Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP), entitled "Transforming Contra Costa County, Our New 30-Year Transportation Expenditure Plan", that sets forth the use of the approximately $2.9 billion expected to be derived from the 30-year sales tax. The TEP includes proposed project and program expenditures, including a revised Growth Management Program (GMP), a new Complete Streets Policy, and a new Advance Mitigation Program to help the Authority achieve its goals to reduce future congestion, manage the impacts of growth, and expand alternatives to the single-occupant vehicle. The Authority approved the final language for the TEP on May 18, 2016 and released the TEP for approval by city/town councils and the County Board of Supervisors. By July 12, 2016, the TEP was approved by the city/town councils of all nineteen of the cities/towns in Contra Costa County and the County Board of Supervisors. Following approval of the TEP by the governing boards of Contra Costa County and its cities/towns, the Authority approved the TEP, with corrections to the BART funding provisions, on July 20, 2016 by Authority Ordinance 16-02. Ordinance 16-02 and the associated TEP are attached to this report. At the same time, it adopted Authority Ordinance No. 16-03, which establishes a transportation sales tax for the period from April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2047, subject to the approval of two-thirds of the voters. Through Authority Resolution 16-41-P, the Authority also requested that the Board of Supervisors call and consolidate an election for the purpose of submitting a ballot measure to the qualified voters seeking approval of the sales tax. Public Utilities Code Section 180201 and 180203 requires the election to be called by a county ordinance. At least five days must elapse between introduction and adoption of the ordinance. The Board’s action today introduces the ordinance, waives its reading, and fixes adoption of the ordinance for August 9, 2016. The Board’s adoption of this ordinance is a ministerial activity that is exempt from CEQA (Public Resources Code section 21080(b)(1)). The sample ballot mailed to the voters will contain the full proposition, as set forth in Section III of Ordinance 2016-17, and the voter information handbook will include the entire TEP and Authority Ordinance No. 16-03, which establishes the sales tax. Pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 180203(a) and Authority Resolution 16-41-P, the Authority will reimburse the County for all costs of conducting the election, including those relating to consolidation of the election. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Board of Supervisors does not take the recommended actions, the Authority’s proposed 30-year countywide transportation sales tax will not be submitted to the voters as a measure on the November 8, 2016 ballot. ATTACHMENTS Ordinance 2016-17 CCTA Ordinance 16-02 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 268 ORDINANCE NO. 2016-17 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2016-17 (Calling of Special Election for Voter Approval to Augment Local Sales Tax for Transportation Purposes) The Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors ordains as follows: SECTION I. SUMMARY. This ordinance calls a special election, at the request of the Contra Costa Transportation Authority, referred to as the “Authority,” for the purpose of submitting to the voters for approval an additional one-half of one percent sales tax for the transportation projects and programs described in the tax ordinance and county transportation expenditure plan adopted by the Authority on July 20, 2016. SECTION II. RECITALS AND FINDINGS. This ordinance is made with reference to the following recitals and findings: Local highway and transportation improvements in Contra Costa County are needed to address countywide mobility needs and alleviate traffic congestion that threatens the economic viability of the area and adversely impacts the quality of life in the County. To manage current and future local transportation maintenance and improvement needs, local jurisdictions need to develop and implement local funding programs that go significantly beyond current federal and state funding, which is inadequate to resolve these problems. It is in the public interest, under the Local Transportation Authority and Improvement Act (Public Utilities Code Section 180000 and following), to allow the voters in Contra Costa County to implement a new retail transactions and use tax (sales tax) ordinance to raise additional local revenues for a transportation expenditure plan that funds transportation improvements and maintenance and meets local transportation needs in a timely manner. In 1988, voters in Contra Costa County passed Measure C, which created a one- half cent sales tax for 20 years to support transportation programs and projects. In 2004, voters approved Measure J, which extended the transportation sales tax for an additional 25 years beyond the previous expiration date. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 269 ORDINANCE NO. 2016-17 2 On May 18, 2016, the Authority authorized the release of a proposed Transportation Expenditure Plan, Transforming Contra Costa County, Our New 30-Year Transportation Expenditure Plan, to the County, cities and towns to consider, among other matters, establishing an additional countywide one-half of one percent sales tax for 30 years to increase the funding of transportation projects, subject to approval by the qualified electors on the November 8, 2016 ballot. As of July 12, 2016, all of Contra Costa County’s nineteen cities and towns representing 100 percent of the incorporated area population, and the County Board of Supervisors, have approved the Transportation Expenditure Plan prior to its final approval by the Authority Board. On July 20, 2016, the Authority Board approved the Transportation Expenditure Plan and requested that the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors call a special election for the purpose of submitting Authority Ordinance No. 16-03, authorizing the additional one-half of one percent sales tax, to voters on the November 8, 2016 ballot. SECTION III. CALL OF SPECIAL ELECTION. At the request of the Authority, pursuant to Public Utilities Code sections 180201 and 180203, the Board of Supervisors hereby calls a special election for the purpose of submitting the following proposition to the voters of the incorporated and unincorporated territory of Contra Costa County for approval: “To implement a Transportation Expenditure Plan to continue: Repairing potholes/fixing roads; Improving BART capacity/reliability; Improving Highways 680, 80, 24, and 4; Enhancing bus/transit including for seniors and people with disabilities; Increasing bicycle/pedestrian safety; Improving air quality; Reducing traffic; shall voters adopt the ordinance augmenting the sales tax by ½%, raising ninety-seven million dollars for transportation improvements annually for 30 years with independent oversight, audits, and all money benefitting local residents?” AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 270 ORDINANCE NO. 2016-17 3 SECTION IV. CONSOLIDATION. As requested by the Authority in Authority Resolution 16-41-P, the election shall be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2016. SECTION V. CONDUCT OF ELECTION. Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 180203(b), the County Clerk (Elections Clerk) shall conduct said election in the same manner as provided by law for the conduct of special elections by a county. SECTION VI. SAMPLE BALLOT AND VOTER HANDBOOK. Pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 180203(c), the sample ballot to be mailed to the voters shall contain the full proposition, as set forth in Section III of this ordinance, and the voter information handbook shall include the entire adopted county transportation expenditure plan and the tax ordinance (Authority Ordinance No. 16-03) referred to in Section II of this ordinance. SECTION VII. ELECTION COST. Pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 180203(a) and Authority Resolution 16-41-P, the Authority shall reimburse the County for all costs of conducting said election, including those relating to consolidation of the election. SECTION VIII. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance becomes effective immediately upon passage and within 15 days after passage shall be published once with the names of supervisors voting for and against it in the EAST BAY TIMES, a newspaper published in this county. PASSED on August 9, 2016 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: David Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator By: AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 271 ORDINANCE NO. 2016-17 4 Deputy Clerk Board Chair [SEAL] RJH H:\Taxes\CCTA\Ordinance\2016 Election Ordinance (1).doc AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 272 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 273 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 274 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 275 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 276 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 277 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 278 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 279 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 280 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 281 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube TABLE OF CONTENTS Transforming Contra Costa County 1 Plan Summary 2 Policy Statements 15 Taxpayer Safeguards and Accountability 24 Contra Costa is a county as unique and diverse as its residents. Our communities stretch from the Richmond coastline to Discovery Bay, from Port Chicago to the San Ramon Valley, and from Mount Diablo to Crockett Hills. We are growing with the times while protecting the qualities that make Contra Costa County a wonderful place to call home. We need a transportation plan that reflects where we are now and, more importantly, our commitment to pursue transportation policies, planning and investments that will get us where we want to be. The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) is responsible for maintaining and improving the county’s transportation system by planning, funding, and delivering critical transportation infrastructure projects and programs that connect our communities, foster a strong economy, increase sustainability, and safely and efficiently get people and freight where they need to go. CCTA is also the county’s designated Congestion Management Agency (CMA), responsible for putting programs in place to keep traffic levels manageable. Currently, our transportation needs significantly exceed available revenue to meet those needs. Over the next 30 years, our population will continue to grow and that population will have new and additional needs. A new countywide funding measure and Transportation Expenditure Plan (TEP) can keep Contra Costa County moving and create the livable and sustainable communities that all Contra Costans deserve. After extensive public engagement and analysis, CCTA prepared a 30-year TEP that will promote a strong economy, protect the environment, maintain and improve local streets and roads, encourage greater transit usage and alternate forms of transportation, and enhance the quality of life for all of Contra Costa’s diverse communities. This new TEP will benefit every person and every part of the county. This plan is transformative on every level. With a strong focus on technology and innovation, the plan will deliver a more efficient, cleaner and faster transportation system. The new plan will significantly cut emissions through an emphasis on transit, electric and other non-fossil fuel oriented modes of transportation and transportation networks. It provides for new BART cars that will reduce energy use, pollution and costs, and that will provide increased frequency of BART trains and improved BART station access, and also provides for improved bus transit operations and improved bus frequency, potential driverless vehicles, bikes in every community, and connectivity among and with all modes of transportation. The plan also sets forward clear policies that ensure that while we grow, we will keep all growth within clear urban limit lines. This will allow the county to continue growing in a smart way, while protecting vital open space for parks and farmland. Furthermore, increased investments in bike and pedestrian paths and walkways bring access to the outdoors to every community. Smooth, safe and complete streets for cars, trucks, buses, bikes and pedestrians, along with extraordinary investments in direct funding to Contra Costa’s communities for local street and road repair, will greatly enhance all communities. For our urban areas, the plan focuses on support for transit and transit-oriented mixed-use development. This includes an emphasis on bicycle and pedestrian opportunities, interconnectivity, transit, traffic smoothing, and technological advances to ensure our systems are efficient and work well together. This plan will benefit the people who live in Contra Costa County by: • Attracting more good jobs, which will reduce commute trips and congestion • Actively managing the impacts of growth on our community so we support local businesses and preserve our environment • Accommodating the needs of all transportation modes, while increasing the use of alternative transportation; and • Enhancing transportation services for seniors, persons with disabilities and school children This TEP was developed with two key documents as guidance – the Expenditure Plan Advisory Committee (EPAC) Vision, Goals and Objectives and the CCTA Principles for Development of a Transportation Expenditure Plan. Both documents are available for review at www.CCTA.net. Building on these two documents and extensive public engagement with stakeholders, the TEP articulates how the Authority will use nearly $3 billion in additional revenue to invest wisely – using locally-generated funds and leveraging outside matching funds – to maximize the benefits for all Contra Costa residents by promoting a strong economy, protecting the environment, maintaining and improving local streets and roads, and encouraging greater transit usage and alternate forms of transportation. Transforming Contra Costa County TRANSFORMING CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Our New 30-Year Transportation Expenditure Plan 1PB AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 282 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Funding amounts in 2016 Dollars For the full breakdown see the chart on page 31. Transportation Expenditure Plan Summary Total Funds 32 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 283 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube See page 31 for detailed distribution of funding by subregion. Transportation Expenditure Plan Summary by Category 6.2% Providing Affordable and Safe Transportation for Children, Seniors, and People with Disabilites 23.8% Fixing Local Streets and Roads 22.0% Building Sustainable Communities and Protecting the Environment 26.8% Improving our BART, Bus, Ferry and Train Networks 20.7% Reducing Congestion and Smoothing Traffic 0.5% Administration Transportation Expenditure Plan Summary by Region Central 29.4% East 28.2% Southwest 19.1% West 23.3% 32 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 284 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Reduces Congestion Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions Improves BART Service Improves Bus Service Expands Bicycle Access/Improves Bicycle Safety Improves Pedestrian Safety Improves Transportation Connectivity Provides Alternatives to Single-Occupant Vehicle Use Integrates New Technology Creates Good Local Jobs Benefits Key Each icon represents a benefit to Contra Costa County as a result of the portion of the plan being described. 54 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 285 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube ImprovIng our BArT, Bus, Ferry And TrAIn neTworks 26.8% This category is intended to provide funding to increase the capacity of and ridership on the BART System in Contra Costa County, including improvements to local BART stations, as well as access and parking in Contra Costa County. Funds in this category are intended to be allocated by the Authority for the acquisition of additional new BART cars, provided that: 1) BART agrees to fund a minimum of $100 million in BART station, access and parking improvements in Contra Costa County from other BART revenues, and 2) a regional approach, that includes commitments of equal funding shares from both Alameda and San Francisco counties and additional regional funding from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, is developed and approved no later than December 31, 2024. BART station, access and parking improvements or alternate public transit services that access BART may include station capacity, safety and operational improvements; infrastructure improvements that facilitate Transit Oriented Development at or near BART stations; additional on or off site parking, last mile shuttle or shared vehicles that provide alternatives to driving single-occupant vehicles to BART stations; and bicycle/pedestrian facilities that provide access to BART stations. In the event that commitments from the four parties to fund additional BART cars are not approved by December 31, 2024, or any date earlier if BART informs the Authority it is no longer pursuing the acquisition of additional BART cars as provided herein, and if BART has maintained the commitment to fund a minimum of $100 million in improvements as described above, the Authority (in consultation with the RTPCs) and BART will jointly identify, and the Authority will allocate these funds for other capacity- enhancing, safety and efficiency increasing projects (to include station, access and parking improvements or alternate public transit services that access BART) that benefit the residents of Contra Costa County. Prior to any appropriation, allocation or reimbursement of funds to BART, the Authority Board shall make a finding that BART has continued to use a proportional share of its operating allocations for capital projects. BART’s preliminary FY 2017 Budget forecasts approximately $144 million of its operating allocations to capital projects. BART shall demonstrate that it continues to use an equivalent proportional share of its operating revenues for capital projects allowing for normal annual fluctuations in capital projects or maintenance expenditures. In years where BART fare revenues or other general fund revenues are reduced by a decrease in ridership or unforeseen economic circumstances, loss of regional, state or federal funding, or where one-time costs are increased by a natural disaster, then the Authority may release funds only if the Authority Board makes findings that 1) BART has not reduced its capital project funding disproportionately to the total operating revenue and 2) BART made best efforts to fund capital projects that benefit Contra Costa County. BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements $300 Million 54 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 286 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Bus Transit and Other Non-Rail Transit Enhancements $295 million Bus Transit Enhancements in the West Subregion of Contra Costa $111 million This subcategory is intended to provide funding for public transit operators to maintain and increase transit operations, including any transit capital expenses and/ or operating expenses for existing service or service improvements/enhancements in the West subregion of Contra Costa. Funding is to provide for bus transit operations to increase or maintain ridership, including incentivizing transit use by offsetting fares, and improve the frequency and capacity of routes, especially high demand routes. Funding will be allocated by the Authority based on input from the WCCTAC in consultation with local bus operators and stakeholders. Bus Transit Enhancements and Other Non-Rail Transit Enhancements in the Central, East and Southwest Subregions of Contra Costa $184 million This subcategory is intended to provide funding for public transit operators to maintain and increase transit operations, including any transit capital expenses and/or operating expenses for existing service or service improvements/ enhancements, and also to provide funding for future non-rail transit service alternatives in the Central, East and Southwest subregions of Contra Costa. Funding is to provide for bus transit operations to increase or maintain ridership, including incentivizing transit use by offsetting fares, and improve the frequency and capacity of routes, especially high demand routes. Funding will be allocated by the Authority for the Central, East and Southwest subregions of Contra Costa based on input from the RTPCs in those subregions, in consultation with local bus operators and stakeholders. Funding allocation by the Authority may include use of a portion of the funds for non-rail transit services/projects that demonstrate an innovative approach to maximize the movement of people efficiently and in a manner that reduces Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Green-house Gas (GHG). Improving Our BART, Bus, Ferry and Train Networks 76 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 287 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Improving Our BART, Bus, Ferry and Train Networks This category is intended to provide funding to construct station and/or track improvements to the Capitol Corridor and/or the San Joaquin corridors, as well as to implement new or improved ferry services (including both capital and operations) in Richmond, Hercules, Martinez and/or Antioch. Projects that increase ridership using existing capacity, including incentivizing use by offsetting fares or other methodologies, may also be considered. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/ or federal funds for this project. Any projects funded in this category will be evaluated by the Authority and demonstrate progress toward the Authority’s goals of reducing Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and green-house gas (GHG) reductions. Selection of final projects to be based on a performance analysis of project alternatives consistent with Authority requirements. Sponsors of projects requesting funding from this category will be required to demonstrate to the Authority that sufficient funding is available to operate the proposed project and/or service over a long period of time. Intercity Rail and Ferries $50 million East Contra Costa Transit Extension (BART or alternative) $70 million This category is intended to provide funding to improve access to and extend high capacity transit service easterly from the Hillcrest BART Station in Antioch through Oakley to a new transit station in Brentwood. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for this project. Funds from this category may be used to complete an interim transit station in Brentwood. High Capacity Transit Improvements along the I-80 Corridor in West Contra Costa County $55 million This category is intended to fund projects/programs for high capacity transit improvements along the I-80 corridor. Final determination on the scope of the improvements to be constructed will be based on the final recommendations in the West County High Capacity Transit Study and in consultation with the west subregion. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for this project. 76 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 288 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube reducIng congesTIon And smooThIng TrAFFIc20.7% Traffic Flow Improvements and High Capacity $250 million Transit Implementation Along I-680 and SR 24 This category is intended to fund an I-680 corridor express lane and operational improvement project to facilitate carpools and increase transit use in the corridors as an alternative to single occupant vehicle travel. Funding may also be used to implement high capacity transit improvements in the corridor (including those identified in the I-680 Transit Investment and Congestion Relief Options and other relevant studies). Funding may also be used to complete improvements to the mainline freeway and/or local interchanges along I-680 and SR 24 as may be required to implement express lane and/or transit projects as well as advanced traffic management programs and/ or other projects or programs that encourage the use of connected vehicle and/or autonomous vehicles in the corridor provided that the project sponsor can show that they reduce congestion, increase mobility and provide alternatives to single occupant vehicle travel. Selection of final projects shall be based on a performance analysis of project alternatives consistent with Authority requirements. Projects funded from this category must be on or near the I-680 or the SR 24 corridors. Of the funds assigned to this category in Southwest County, $20 million will be eligible for interchange improvements on the SR 24. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for this project. East County Corridor $117 million (Vasco Road and/or Byron Highway Corridors) Improvements The Authority shall provide funding to construct a new 2-lane “limited access” connector between Byron Highway and Vasco Road south of Camino Diablo Road as well as shoulder and other improvements to the Byron Highway (including a railroad grade separation) to improve safety and access to the Byron Airport and to facilitate economic development and access for goods movement in East Contra Costa County. For the Vasco Road corridor, the Authority shall provide funding for safety and other improvements oriented at facilitating the use of high-capacity transit and/or high occupancy carpools. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for these projects. Prior to the use of any local sales tax funds to implement capacity improvements to either or both of these corridors, the Authority Board must make a finding that the project(s) include measures to prevent growth outside of the Urban Limit Lines (ULL). Such measures might include, but are not necessarily limited to, limits on roadway access in areas outside the ULL, purchase of abutters’ rights of access, preservation of critical habitat and/or the permanent protection/acquisition of agricultural and open space or performing conservation measures required to cover this project under the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (HCP/NCP). With the exception of the new connection between Vasco Road and the Byron Highway, funding from this category shall not be used to construct new roadways on new alignments. The Authority will work with Alameda and/ or San Joaquin Counties to address project impacts in those jurisdictions. 98 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 289 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Reducing Congestion and Smoothing Traffic Traffic Flow Improvements Along the SR 242 and SR 4 $108 million This category is intended to provide funding to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion between Concord and Brentwood along State Route 242 and State Route 4 to reduce congestion, increase mobility and provide alternatives to single occupant vehicle travel. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for this project. Advanced traffic management programs and/or other projects or programs that encourage the use of connected vehicle and/or autonomous vehicles in the corridor are eligible for funding from this category provided that the project sponsor can demonstrate that they reduce congestion, increase mobility and provide alternatives to single occupant vehicle travel. Projects funded from this category must be on or near the SR 242 or SR 4 corridors. Selection of final project(s) shall be based on a performance analysis of project alternatives consistent with Authority requirements. This category is intended to fund improvements of the I-80 interchanges at San Pablo Dam Road, Central Avenue, and other locations along I-80 in consultation with the subregion. The improvements of the interchanges are a priority to gain corridor traffic flow improvements. I-80 Interchange Improvements at $60 million San Pablo Dam Road and Central Avenue Interstate 680/State Route 4 Interchange $60 million This category is intended to fund an Interstate 680/State Route 4 interchange improvement project as necessary to improve traffic flow and enhance traffic safety along both the I-680 and SR 4 corridors. To the greatest degree possible, local funds generated by this measure shall be used to leverage additional regional, state and/or federal funds for this project. Authority shall prioritize local funding commitments to this project in such a way as to encourage carpools and vanpools, public transit usage and other alternatives to the single occupant vehicle. 98 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 290 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Local Street Maintenance & Improvements $664 million This category is intended to fund maintenance and improvement projects on local streets and roads and may be used for any eligible transportation purposes as defined under the Act. The Authority will distribute 23.1 percent of the annual sales tax revenues to all local jurisdictions with a base allocation of $100,000 for each jurisdiction, the balance will be distributed based 50 percent on relative population and 50 percent on road miles for each jurisdiction, subject to compliance with the Authority’s reporting, audit and GMP requirements. Population figures used shall be the most current available from the State Department of Finance. Road mileage shall be from the most current information included in the Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) Funds shall be used by each jurisdiction to maintain and enhance existing roadway and other transportation facilities. Jurisdictions shall comply with the Authority’s Maintenance of Effort (MOE) policy as well as Implementation Guidelines of this TEP. Local agencies will report on the use of these funds, such as the amount spent on roadway maintenance, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, transit facilities, and other roadway improvements. This subcategory is intended to fund additional maintenance and improvement projects on local streets and roads. These additional funds will be allocated to Central Contra Costa County jurisdictions based on the formula of 50 percent on relative population and 50 percent on road miles for each jurisdiction and subject to program requirements detailed above. Additional Local Street Maintenance & Improvements $20 million FIxIng LocAL sTreeTs And roAds23.8% 1110 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 291 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube provIdIng AFFordABLe And sAFe TrAnsporTATIon For chILdren, senIors And peopLe wITh dIsABILITIes6.2% Safe Transportation for Children $64 million This category is to provide funds to programs and projects that promote safe transportation options for children to access schools or after school programs. Eligible projects include but are not limited to reduced fare transit passes and transit incentive programs, school bus programs, and projects for pedestrian and bicycle safety that provide school-related access. The Authority will allocate funds and will establish guidelines (in cooperation with project sponsors) to define priorities and maximize effectiveness. The guidelines may require provisions such as parent contributions; operational efficiencies; specific performance criteria and reporting requirements. Transportation for Seniors & People With Disabilities $115 million Funding in this category is to support mobility opportunities for seniors and people with disabilities who, due to age or disability, cannot drive or take other transit options. To ensure services are delivered in a coordinated system that maximizes both service delivery and efficiency, an Accessible Transportation Service (ATS) Strategic Plan will be developed and periodically updated during the term of the measure. No funding under this category will be allocated until the ATS Strategic Plan has been developed and adopted. An overarching component in the development and delivery of the ATS Strategic Plan is using mobility management to ensure coordination and efficiencies in accessible service delivery. The plan will address both Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and non-ADA services. The plan will evaluate the appropriate model for our local structure including how accessible services are delivered by all agencies and where appropriate coordination can improve transportation services, eliminate gaps in service and find efficiencies in the service delivered. The ATS Strategic Plan would also determine the investments and oversight of the program funding and identify timing, projects, service delivery options, administrative structure, and fund leverage opportunities. The ATS Strategic Plan will be developed by the Authority, in consultation with direct users of service, stakeholders representing seniors and people with disabilities who face mobility barriers, and non-profit and publicly operated paratransit service providers. Public operators in Contra Costa must participate in the ATS planning process to be eligible to receive funding in this category. The ATS Strategic Plan must be adopted no later than April 1, 2018. The development of the ATS Strategic Plan will not affect the allocation of funds to current operators as prescribed in the existing Measure J Expenditure Plan. 1110 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 292 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Major Streets, Complete Streets, and Traffic Synchronization Project Grants $290 million This category is intended to fund improvements to major thoroughfares throughout Contra Costa to improve the safe, efficient and reliable movement of buses, vehicles, bicyclists and pedestrians along said corridors (i.e. traffic smoothing). Eligible projects shall include a variety of components that meet the needs of all users and respond to the context of the facility. Projects may include but are not limited to installation of bike and pedestrian facilities, installation of “smart” parking management programs, separated bike lanes, synchronization of traffic signals and other technology solutions to manage traffic, traffic calming and pedestrian safety improvements, shoulders, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, streetscapes and bus transit facility enhancements such as bus turnouts and passenger amenities. As an element of this program, the Authority will adopt a ‘traffic signal synchronization’ program and award grants for installation of ‘state of the art’ technology designed to smooth the flow of traffic along major arterial roadways throughout the county. Funding from this program will be prioritized to projects that improve access for all modes to jobs, commercial areas and transit, and the design process which includes opportunity for public input from existing and potential users of the facility. Priority will be given to projects that can show a high percentage of “other funding” allocated to the project (i.e. – leverage). The Authority will adopt program guidelines that will include information regarding how to evaluate the range of possible project components. All projects will be selected through a competitive project selection process within each subregion with the Authority approving the final program of projects, allowing for a comprehensive countywide approach while recognizing subregional needs to achieve the overall program goal. All projects funded through this program must comply with the Authority’s Complete Streets Policy and include complete street elements whenever possible. Twenty percent of the program funding will be allocated to four Complete Streets demonstration projects, one in each subregion, recommended by the relevant RTPC and approved by Authority, to demonstrate the successful implementation of Complete Streets projects no later than April 1, 2022.. Projects will be required to strongly pursue the use of separated bike lane facilities in the demonstration project program. The purpose of these demonstration projects is to create examples of successful complete street projects in multiple situations throughout the county. BuILdIng susTAInABLe communITIes And proTecTIng The envIronmenT 22.0% 1312 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 293 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube 13 Building Sustainable Communities and Protecting the Environment Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trail Facilities $115 million Two-thirds of the funds from this program shall be used to implement projects in the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan, consistent with the current Measure J program. These funds shall be allocated to projects that improve safety for pedestrians and bicyclists, serve the greatest number of users and significant destinations, and remove missing segments and existing barriers to walking and bicycling. All projects will be selected through a competitive project selection process within each subregion with the Authority approving the final program of projects, allowing for a comprehensive countywide approach while recognizing subregional needs to achieve the overall program goal. The review process shall consider project feasibility and readiness and the differing needs of the sub-regions when identifying projects for funding. Funding available through this program is to be primarily used to construct and maintain bicycle, pedestrian and trail facilities, as well as to make safety or other improvements to bicycle, pedestrian and trail facilities. Planning to identify a preferred alignment for major new bicycle, pedestrian or trail connections may also be funded through this program. One-third of the funds are to be allocated to the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) for the development and rehabilitation of paved regional trails. EBRPD is to spend its allocation proportionally in each sub-region, subject to the review and approval of the conceptual planning/ design phase by the applicable sub-regional committee, prior to funding allocation by the Authority. The Authority in conjunction with EBRPD will develop a maintenance-of- effort requirement for funds under this component of the funding category. Consistent with the Countywide Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan and the complete streets policy established in this expenditure plan, project sponsors receiving funding through other funding categories in this Plan shall incorporate, whenever possible, pedestrian, bicycle, and trail facilities into their projects. Community Development Transportation Program $100 million This category is intended to provide funding to implement a new Community Development Transportation Program (CDTP) to be administered by the Authority in conjunction with the Authority’s existing Transportation for Livable Communities Program (TLC) with projects identified by the Authority’s Regional Transportation Planning Committees (RTPCs). Funds will be allocated by the Authority on a competitive basis to transportation projects or programs that promote housing within planned or established centers that are supported by transit, or that support economic development and job creation in Contra Costa County. All projects will be selected through a competitive project selection process within each subregion with the Authority approving the final program of projects, allowing for a comprehensive countywide approach while recognizing subregional needs to achieve the overall program goal. Project sponsors must demonstrate that at least 20 percent of the project is funded from other than local transportation sales tax revenue. Additional priority will be given to projects where the sponsor can demonstrate that the project supports and facilitates development of jobs or housing for all income levels and that have additional matching funds that have already been committed or secured. Working with the RTPCs, the Authority will prepare guidelines and establish overall criteria for the program with the intent of complementing and administering the program in conjunction with the Authority’s Measure J TLC program no later than December 31, 2017. 1312 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 294 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Building Sustainable Communities and Protecting the Environment Innovative Transportation Technology/Connected Communities Program $65 million This category is intended to provide funding for the planning and development of projects and programs that include innovative solutions intended to (a) develop and demonstrate transportation innovation through real-world applications, (b) reduce GHG emissions, and (c) implement connected transportation solutions. The Authority intends innovative solutions to include installing new digital and communications infrastructures, automated processes and intelligent controls, and integration with other community services, such as public safety and communications providers, to support a more integrated transportation system that promotes economic development, expanded job opportunities, increased government efficiency, reductions in consumption of nonrenewable resources, and increased sustainability, safety and mobility. Examples of eligible projects include but are not limited to expanding opportunities for zero emission vehicle charging; smart rideshare, carshare and bikeshare services; on-demand and personal transit services that complement traditional fixed- route transit; smart and automated parking; intelligent, sensor-based infrastructure; smart payment systems; and data sharing to improve mobility choices for all users. Projects are intended to promote connectivity between all users of the transportation network (cars, pedestrians, bikes, buses, trucks, etc.) and automation technologies that collectively facilitate the transformation toward connected communities. Funding is intended to match State, federal, or regional grants and private-sector investment to achieve maximum benefits. By investing in these solutions, Contra Costa County can become a national model in sustainable, technology-enabled transportation. A minimum of twenty-five percent is to be allocated to each sub-program (a, b and c above) over the life of the measure. The Authority will prepare guidelines and establish overall criteria for the Innovative Transportation Technology/Connected Communities Program and provide technical resources to project sponsors. All programs/projects will be selected through a competitive project selection process within each subregion with the Authority approving the final programs/projects for each of the sub-programs, allowing for a comprehensive countywide approach while recognizing subregional needs to achieve the overall program goal. Project sponsors must demonstrate that the programs provide highly efficient services that are cost effective, integrated and responsive to the needs of the community. Regional Transportation Priorities $19 million This category is intended to fund any project or program identified in the Expenditure Plan or eligible under the provisions of the Act, including activities that promote alternatives to travel in single occupant vehicles. Program and project recommendations shall be made by each subregion for consideration and funding by the Authority. Transportation Planning, Facilities and Services $43 million This category is intended to provide funding to implement the countywide Growth Management Program, prepare the countywide transportation plan, and support the programming and monitoring of federal and state funds, as well as the Authority’s Congestion Management Agency functions. 1514 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 295 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube poLIcy sTATemenTs 1 The Authority will, to the extent possible, attempt to harmonize the Growth Management and the State-mandated Congestion Management Programs. To the extent they conflict, Congestion Management Program Activities shall take precedence over Growth Management activities. The Growth Management Program Goals and Objectives The overall goal of the Growth Management Program is to preserve and enhance the quality of life and promote a healthy, strong economy to benefit the people and areas of Contra Costa through a cooperative, multi-jurisdictional process for managing growth, while maintaining local authority over land use decisions.1 The objectives of the Growth Management Program are to: • Assure that new residential, business and commercial growth pays for the facilities required to meet the demands resulting from that growth. • Require cooperative transportation and land use planning among Contra Costa County, cities, towns, and transportation agencies. • Support land use patterns within Contra Costa that make more efficient use of the transportation system, consistent with the General Plans of local jurisdictions. • Support infill and redevelopment in existing urban and brownfield areas. The Measure J Transportation Expenditure Plan Growth Management Program (see page 18) includes: Principles of Agreement for Establishing the Urban Limit Line, is replaced in its entirety by this Growth Management Program (see page 18): Urban Limit Line (ULL) Definitions and Compliance Requirements. Components To receive its share of the 2016 Transforming Contra Costa County Expenditure Plan funding from Local Streets Maintenance and Improvements funds and its share of Contra Costa’s Measure J Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan Local Streets Maintenance & Improvements funding and to be eligible for Contra Costa’s Measure J Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Transportation for Livable Communities funds and the 2016 Transforming Contra Costa County Expenditure Plan funding from Community Development Transportation Program funds each jurisdiction must: 1. Adopt a Growth Management Element Each jurisdiction must adopt, or maintain in place, a Growth Management Element as part of its General Plan that outlines the jurisdiction’s goals and policies for managing growth and requirements for achieving those goals. The Growth Management Element must show how the jurisdiction will comply with sections 2–8 below. The Authority will refine its model Growth Management Element and administrative procedures in consultation with the Regional Transportation Planning Committees to reflect the revised Growth Management Program. Each jurisdiction is encouraged to incorporate other standards and procedures into its Growth Management Element to support the objectives and required components of this Growth Management Program. 2. Adopt a Development Mitigation Program Each jurisdiction must adopt, or maintain in place, a development mitigation program to ensure that new growth is paying its share of the costs associated with that growth. This program shall consist of both a local program to mitigate impacts on local streets and other facilities and a regional program to fund regional and subregional transportation projects, consistent with the Countywide Comprehensive Transportation Plan. 1514 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 296 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube The jurisdiction’s local development mitigation program shall ensure that revenue provided from this measure shall not be used to replace private developer funding that has or would have been committed to any project. The regional development mitigation program shall establish fees, exactions, assessments or other mitigation measures to fund regional or subregional transportation improvements needed to mitigate the impacts of planned or forecast development. Regional mitigation programs may adjust such fees, exactions, assessments or other mitigation measures when developments are within walking distance of frequent transit service or are part of a mixed-use development of sufficient density and with necessary facilities to support greater levels of walking and bicycling. Each Regional Transportation Planning Committee shall develop the regional development mitigation program for its region, taking account of planned and forecast growth and the Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives and actions to achieve them established in the Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance. Regional Transportation Planning Committees may use existing regional mitigation programs, if consistent with this section, to comply with the Growth Management Program. 3. Address Housing Options Each jurisdiction shall demonstrate reasonable progress in providing housing opportunities for all income levels as part of a report on the implementation of the actions outlined in its adopted Housing Element. The report will demonstrate progress by: a. Comparing the number of housing units approved, constructed or occupied within the jurisdiction over the preceding five years with the number of units needed on average each year to meet the housing objectives established in the jurisdiction’s Housing Element; or b. Illustrating how the jurisdiction has adequately planned to meet the existing and projected housing needs through the adoption of land use plans and regulatory systems which provide opportunities for, and do not unduly constrain, housing development; or c. Illustrating how a jurisdiction’s General Plan and zoning regulations facilitate the improvement and development of sufficient housing to meet those objectives. In addition, each jurisdiction shall consider the impacts that its land use and development policies have on the local, regional and countywide transportation system, including the level of transportation capacity that can reasonably be provided, and shall incorporate policies and standards into its development approval process that support transit, bicycle and pedestrian access in new developments. 4. Participate in an Ongoing Cooperative, Multi-Jurisdictional Planning Process. Each jurisdiction shall participate in an ongoing process with other jurisdictions and agencies, the Regional Transportation Planning Committees and the Authority to create a balanced, safe and efficient transportation system and to manage the impacts of growth. Jurisdictions shall work with the Regional Transportation Planning Committees to: a. Identify Routes of Regional Significance, and establish Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives or other tools adopted by the Authority for measuring performance and quality of service along routes of significance, collectively referred to as Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives for those routes and actions for achieving those objectives. b. Apply the Authority’s travel demand model and technical procedures to the analysis of General Plan Amendments (GPAs) and developments exceeding specified thresholds for their effect on the regional transportation system, including on Action Plan objectives. c. Create the development mitigation programs outlined in section 2 above. d. Help develop other plans, programs and studies to address other transportation and growth management issues. In consultation with the Regional Transportation Planning Committees, each jurisdiction will use the travel demand model 1716 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 297 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube to evaluate changes to local General Plans and the impacts of major development projects for their effects on the local and regional transportation system and the ability to achieve the Multimodal Transportation Service Objectives established in the Action Plans. Jurisdictions shall also participate in the Authority’s ongoing countywide comprehensive transportation planning process. As part of this process, the Authority shall support countywide and subregional planning efforts, including the Action Plans for Routes of Regional Significance, and shall maintain a travel demand model. Jurisdictions shall help maintain the Authority’s travel demand modeling system by providing information on proposed improvements to the transportation system and planned and approved development within the jurisdiction. 5. Continuously Comply with an Urban Limit Line (ULL) In order to be found in compliance with this element of the Authority’s Growth Management Program, all jurisdictions must continually comply with an applicable voter approved Urban Limit Line (ULL). Said ULL may either be the Contra Costa County voter approved ULL (County ULL) or a locally initiated, voter approved ULL (LV- ULL). Additional information and detailed compliance requirements for the ULL are fully defined in the ULL Compliance Requirements, which are incorporated (see page 18). Any of the following actions by a local jurisdiction will constitute non-compliance with the Growth Management Program: 1. The submittal of an annexation request to Local Agency Formation Commission ( LAFCO) for lands outside of a jurisdiction’s applicable ULL. 2. Failure to conform to the Authority’s ULL Compliance Requirements (See page 18). 6. Develop a Five-Year Capital Improvement Program Each jurisdiction shall prepare and maintain a capital improvement program that outlines the capital projects needed to implement the goals and policies of the jurisdiction’s General Plan for at least the following five-year period. The Capital Improvement Program shall include approved projects and an analysis of the costs of the proposed projects as well as a financial plan for providing the improvements. The jurisdiction shall forward the transportation component of its capital improvement program to the Authority for incorporation into the Authority’s database of transportation projects. 7. Adopt a Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Ordinance or Resolution To promote carpools, vanpools and park and ride lots, each jurisdiction shall adopt a local ordinance or resolution that conforms to the model Transportation Systems Management Ordinance that the Transportation Authority has drafted and adopted. Upon approval of the Authority, cities with a small employment base may adopt alternative mitigation measures in lieu of a TSM ordinance or resolution. 8. Adopt Additional Growth Management Policies, as applicable Each jurisdiction shall adopt and thereafter continuously maintain the following policies (where applicable): a hillside development policy, a ridgeline protection policy, a wildlife corridor policy and a creek development policy. Where a jurisdiction does not have a developable hillside, ridgeline, wildlife corridor or creek, it need not adopt the corresponding policy. An ordinance that implements the East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP shall satisfy the requirement to have an adopted wildlife corridor policy and creek development policy. In addition to the above, jurisdictions with Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance (as defined by the California Dept. of Conservation and mapped by FMMP) within their planning areas but outside of their city shall adopt and thereafter continuously maintain an Agricultural Protection Policy. The policy must ensure that potential impacts of converting Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance outside the ULL to other uses are identified and disclosed when considering such a conversion. The applicable policies are required to be in place by no later than April 1, 2019. 1716 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 298 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Allocation of Funds Portions of the monies received from the retail transaction and use tax will be returned to the local jurisdictions (the cities and the county) for use on local, subregional and/or regional transportation improvements and maintenance projects. Receipt of all such funds requires compliance with the Growth Management Program and the allocation procedures described below. The funds are to be distributed on a formula based on population and road miles. Each jurisdiction shall demonstrate its compliance with all of the components of the Growth Management Program in a completed compliance checklist. The jurisdiction shall submit, and the Authority shall review and make findings regarding the jurisdiction’s compliance with the requirements of the Growth Management Program, consistent with the Authority’s adopted policies and procedures. If the Authority determines that the jurisdiction complies with the requirements of the Growth Management Program, it shall allocate to the jurisdiction its share of 2016 Transforming Contra Costa County Expenditure Plan funding from Local Streets Maintenance and Improvements funding and its share of Contra Costa’s Measure J Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan Local Streets Maintenance & Improvements funding. Jurisdictions may use funds allocated under this provision to comply with these administrative requirements. If the Authority determines that the jurisdiction does not comply with the requirements of the Growth Management Program, the Authority shall withhold those funds and also make a finding that the jurisdiction shall not be eligible to receive 2016 Transforming Contra Costa County Expenditure Plan funding from Community Development Transportation Program funds or Contra Costa’s Measure J Transportation Sales Tax Expenditure Plan Transportation for Livable Communities funds until the Authority determines the jurisdiction has achieved compliance. The Authority’s findings of noncompliance may set deadlines and conditions for achieving compliance. Withholding of funds, reinstatement of compliance, reallocation of funds and treatment of unallocated funds shall be as established in adopted Authority’s policies and procedures. Urban Limit Line (ULL) Compliance Requirements Definitions - the following definitions apply to the GMP ULL requirement: 1. Urban Limit Line (ULL): An urban limit line, urban growth boundary, or other equivalent physical boundary judged by the Authority to clearly identify the physical limits of the local jurisdiction’s future urban development 2. Local Jurisdictions: Includes Contra Costa County, the 19 cities and towns within Contra Costa, plus any newly incorporated cities or towns established after April 1, 2017. 3. County ULL: A ULL placed on the ballot by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors, approved by voters at a countywide election, and in effect through the applicable GMP compliance period. The current County ULL was established by Measure L approved by voters in 2006. The following local jurisdictions have adopted the County ULL as their applicable ULL: City of Brentwood Town of Moraga City of Clayton City of Oakley City of Concord City of Orinda Town of Danville City of Pinole 1918 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 299 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube City of El Cerrito City of Pleasant Hill City of Hercules City of Richmond City of Lafayette City of San Pablo City of Martinez City of Walnut Creek 4. Local Voter ULL (LV-ULL): A ULL or equivalent measure placed on the local jurisdiction ballot, approved by the jurisdiction’s voters, and recognized by action of the local jurisdiction’s legislative body as its applicable, voter- approved ULL. The LV-ULL will be used as of its effective date to meet the Authority’s GMP ULL requirement and must be in effect through the applicable GMP compliance period. The following local jurisdictions have adopted a LV-ULL: City of Antioch City of San Ramon City of Pittsburg 5. Minor Adjustment: An adjustment to the ULL of 30 acres or less is intended to address unanticipated circumstances. 6. Other Adjustments: Other adjustments that address issues of unconstitutional takings, and conformance to state and federal law. Revisions to the ULL 1. A local jurisdiction which has adopted the County ULL as its applicable ULL may revise its ULL with local voter approval at any time during the term of the Authority’s GMP by adopting a LV-ULL in accordance with the requirements outlined for a LV-ULL contained in the definitions section. 2. A local jurisdiction may revise its LV-ULL with local voter approval at any time during the term of the Authority’s GMP if the resultant ULL meets the requirements outlined for a LV-ULL contained in the definitions section. 3. If voters, through a countywide ballot measure, approve a revision to the County ULL, the legislative body of each local jurisdiction relying on the County ULL shall: a. Accept and approve its existing ULL to continue as its applicable ULL, or b. Accept and approve the revised County ULL as its applicable ULL, or c. Adopt a LV-ULL in accordance with the requirements outlined for a LV-ULL contained in the definitions section. 4. Local jurisdictions may, without voter approval, enact Minor Adjustments to their applicable ULL subject to a vote of at least 4/5 of the jurisdiction’s legislative body and meeting the following requirements: a. Minor adjustment shall not exceed 30 acres. b. Adoption of at least one of the findings listed in the County’s Measure L (§82-1.018 of County Ordinances 2006-06 § 3, 91-1 § 2, 90-66 § 4) which include: • A natural or man-made disaster or public emergency has occurred which warrants the provision of housing and/or other community needs within land located outside the urban limit line. • An objective study has determined that the urban limit line is preventing the jurisdiction from providing its fair share of affordable housing, or regional housing, as required by state law, and the governing elected legislative body finds that a change to the urban limit line is necessary and the only feasible means to enable the county jurisdiction to meet these requirements of state law. 1918 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 300 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube • A majority of the cities that are party to a preservation agreement and the county have approved a change to the urban limit line affecting all or any portion of the land covered by the preservation agreement. • A minor change to the urban limit line will more accurately reflect topographical characteristics or legal boundaries. • A five-year cyclical review of the urban limit line has determined, based on the criteria and factors for establishing the urban limit line set forth in Contra Costa County Code (Section 82-1.010), that new information is available (from city, town, or county growth management studies or otherwise) or circumstances have changed, warranting a change to the urban limit line. • An objective study has determined that a change to the urban limit line is necessary or desirable to further the economic viability of the East Contra Costa County Airport, and either (i) mitigate adverse aviation-related environmental or community impacts attributable to Buchanan Field, or (ii) further the county’s aviation related needs; or • A change is required to conform to applicable California or federal law. c. Adoption of a finding that the proposed Minor Adjustment will have a public benefit. Said public benefit could include, but is not necessarily limited to, enhanced mobility of people or goods, environmental protections or enhancements, improved air quality or land use, enhanced public safety or security, housing or jobs, infrastructure preservation or other significant positive community effects as defined by the local land use authority. If the proposed Minor Adjustment to the ULL is proposed to accommodate housing or commercial development, said proposal must include permanent environmental protections or enhancements such as the permanent protection of agricultural lands, the dedication of open space or the establishment of permanent conservation easements. d. The Minor Adjustment is not contiguous to one or more non-voter approved Minor Adjustments that in total exceed 30 acres. e. The Minor Adjustment does not create a pocket of land outside the existing urban limit line, specifically to avoid the possibility of a jurisdiction wanting to fill in those subsequently through separate adjustments. f. Any jurisdiction proposing to process a minor adjustment to its applicable ULL that impacts Prime Farmland and Farmland of Statewide Importance (as defined by the California Dept. of Conservation and mapped by FMMP) is required to have an adopted Agricultural Protection Ordinance or must demonstrate how the loss of these agricultural lands will be mitigated by permanently protecting farmland. 5. A local jurisdiction may revise its LV-ULL, and the County may revise the County ULL, to address issues of unconstitutional takings or conformance to State or federal law. Conditions of Compliance 1. Submittal of an annexation request of greater than 30 acres by a local jurisdiction to LAFCO outside of a voter- approved ULL will constitute non-compliance with the GMP. 2. For each jurisdiction, an applicable ULL shall be in place through each GMP compliance reporting period in order for the local jurisdiction to be found in compliance with the GMP requirements. 2120 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 301 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Complete Streets Policy Vision This Plan envisions a transportation system in which each component provides safe, comfortable and convenient access for every user allowed to use it. These users include pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, automobile drivers and their passengers, and truckers, and people of varying abilities, including children, seniors, people with disabilities and able- bodied adults. The goal of every transportation project is to provide safer, more accessible facilities for all users and all projects shall be planned, designed, constructed and operated to take advantage of that opportunity. By making streets more efficient and safe for all users, a complete streets approach will expand capacity and improve mobility for all users, giving commuters convenient options for travel and minimizing the need to widen roadways. Policy To achieve this vision, all recipients of funding through this Plan shall consider and accommodate, wherever possible and subject to the Exceptions listed in this Policy, the needs of all users in the planning, design, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation and maintenance of the transportation system. This determination shall be consistent with the exceptions listed below. Achieving this vision will require balancing the needs of different users, and may require reallocating existing right of way for different uses. The Authority shall revise its project development guidelines to require the consideration and accommodation of all users in the design and construction of projects funded with Measure funds and shall adopt peer review and design standards to implement that approach. The guidelines will allow flexibility in responding to the context of each project and the needs of users specific to the project’s context, and will build on accepted best practices for complete streets and context-sensitive design. To ensure that this policy is carried out, the Authority shall prepare a checklist that sponsors of projects using Measure funds must submit that documents how the needs of all users were considered and how they were accommodated in the design and construction of the project. In the checklist, the sponsor will outline how they provided opportunity for public input, in a public forum, from all users early in the project development and design process. If the proposed project or program will not provide context appropriate conditions for all users, the sponsor shall document the reasons why in the checklist, consistent with the following section on “exceptions” below. The completed checklist shall be made part of the approval of programming of funding for the project or the funding allocation resolution. Recipients of Local Maintenance and Improvements funds shall adopt procedures that ensure that all agency departments consider and accommodate the needs of all users for projects or programs affecting public rights of way for which the agency is responsible. These procedures shall: 1) be consistent with and be designed to implement each agency’s general plan policies once that plan has been updated to comply with the Complete Streets Act of 2008, 2) involve and coordinate the work of all agency departments and staff whose projects will affect the public right of way, 3) consider the complete street design standards adopted by the Authority, and 4) provide opportunity for public review by all potential users early in the project development and design phase so that options can be fully considered. This review could be done through an advisory committee such as a Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee or as part of the review of the agency’s capital improvement program. As part of their biennial Growth Management Program checklist, agencies shall list projects funded by the Measure and detail how those projects accommodated users of all modes. 2120 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 302 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube As part of the multi-jurisdictional planning required by the Growth Management Program, agencies shall work with the Authority and the Regional Transportation Planning Committees to harmonize the planning, design and construction of transportation facilities for all modes within their jurisdiction with the plans of adjoining and connecting jurisdictions. Exceptions Project sponsors may provide a lesser accommodation or forgo complete street accommodation components when the public works director or equivalent agency official finds that: 1. Pedestrians, bicyclists, or other users are prohibited by law from using the transportation facility, 2. The cost of new accommodation would be excessively disproportionate to the need or probable use, or 3. The sponsor demonstrates that, such accommodation is not needed, based on objective factors including: a. current and projected user demand for all modes based on current and future land use, and b. lack of identified conflicts, both existing and potential, between modes of travel. Project sponsors shall explicitly approve exceptions findings as part of the approval of any project using measure funds to improve streets classified as a major collector or above.1 Prior to this project sponsors must provide an opportunity for public input at an approval body (that regularly considers design issues) and/or the governing board of the project sponsor. Advance Mitigation Program The Authority is committed to participate in the creation and funding of an Advance Mitigation Program as an innovative way to advance needed infrastructure projects more efficiently and provide more effective conservation of our natural resources, watersheds and wetlands, and agricultural lands. As a global biodiversity hot spot, the Bay Area and Contra Costa County hosts an extraordinarily rich array of valuable natural communities and ecosystems that provide habitat for rare plants and wildlife, and support residents’ health and quality of life by providing clean drinking water, clean air, opportunities for outdoor recreation, protection from disasters like flooding, landslides, and adaptation to climate change. The Advance Mitigation Program aims to integrate conservation into infrastructure agencies’ plans and project development well in advance and on a regional scale to reduce potential impacts of transportation projects, as well as to drive mitigation dollars to protect regional conservation priorities and protect important ecological functions, watersheds and wetlands, and agricultural lands that are at threat of loss. The Advance Mitigation Program will provide environmental mitigation activities specifically required under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Clean Water Act Section 401 and Section 404, and other applicable regulations in the implementation of the major highway, transit and regional arterial and local streets and roads projects identified in the Plan. The Authority’s participation in an Advance Mitigation Program is subject to the following conditions: 1. Development of a Regional Conservation Assessment/Framework that identifies conservation priorities and mitigation opportunities for all of Contra Costa County. The Regional Conservation Assessment/Framework will include countywide opportunities and strategies that are, among other requirements, consistent with 1. Major Collectors and above, as defined by the California Department of Transportation California Road System (CRS maps). 2322 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 303 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube and support the East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP) for the areas of the county covered by the East Contra Costa HCP/NCCP. The Regional Conservation Assessment/Framework will identify mitigation opportunities for all areas of the county to ensure that mitigation occurs in the vicinity of the project impact to the greatest extent possible. The Authority will review and approve the Regional Conservation Assessment/Framework, in consultation with the RTPCs, prior to the allocation of funds for Advance Mitigation Program. 2. Development of a Project Impacts Assessment that identifies the portfolio of projects to be included in the Advance Mitigation Program and the estimated costs for mitigation of the environmental impacts of the projects. The Authority will review and approve the Project Impacts Assessment prior to the allocation of funds for the Advance Mitigation Program. The Assessment and estimated costs do not in any way limit the amount of mitigation that may be necessary or undertaken for the environmental impacts of the projects. 3. Development of the legislative and regulatory framework necessary to implement an Advance Mitigation Program in Contra Costa County. 4. The identification of the Implementing Agency to administer the Advance Mitigation Program for Contra Costa County or portions of the Bay Area Including Contra Costa County. The Authority will determine the amount of funds to be dedicated to this Program following the satisfaction of the above conditions. Funds from the Plan will be allocated consistent with the Regional Conservation Assessment/Framework to fund environmental mitigation activities required in the implementation of the major highway, transit and regional arterial and local streets and roads projects identified in the Plan. If this approach cannot be fully implemented, these funds shall be used for environmental mitigation purposes on a project by project basis. Mitigation required for future transportation improvements identified in the Plan are not limited by the availability of funding or mitigation credits available in the Program. Projects funded from the following categories of Expenditures are eligible for inclusion in the Advance Mitigation Program: • Major Streets, Complete Streets and Traffic Synchronization Project Grants • East Contra Costa Transit Extension • High Capacity Transit Improvements along the I-80 Corridor in West Contra Costa County • Traffic Flow Improvements Along I-680 and SR 24 • Traffic Flow Improvements Along SR 242 and SR 4 • I-80 Interchange Improvements at San Pablo Dam Road and Central Ave • I-680 and SR 4 Interchange Improvements • East County Corridor (Vasco Road and/or Byron Highway Corridors) • Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trail Facilities • Community Development Transportation Program 2322 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 304 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Governing Structure Governing Body and Administration The Authority is governed by a Board composed of 11 members, all elected officials, with the following representation: • Two members from the Central County Regional Transportation Planning Commission (RTPC) also referred to as TRANSPAC • Two members from the East County RTPC, also referred to as TRANSPLAN • Two members from the Southwest County RTPC, also referred to as SWAT • Two members from the West County RTPC, also referred to as WCCTAC • One member from the Conference of Mayors • Two members from the Board of Supervisors The Authority Board also includes three (3) ex-officio, non-voting members, appointed by the MTC, BART and the Public Transit Operators in Contra Costa County. The four subregions within Contra Costa: Central, West, Southwest and East County are each represented by a Regional Transportation Planning Commission (RTPC). Central County (TRANSPAC subregion) includes Clayton, Concord, Martinez, Pleasant Hill, Walnut Creek and the unincorporated portions of Central County. West County (WCCTAC subregion) includes El Cerrito, Hercules, Pinole, Richmond, San Pablo and the unincorporated portions of West County. Southwest County (SWAT subregion) includes Danville, Lafayette, Moraga, Orinda, San Ramon and the unincorporated portions of Southwest County. East County (TRANSPLAN subregion) includes Antioch, Brentwood, Oakley, Pittsburg and the unincorporated portions of East County. Public Oversight Committee The Public Oversight Committee (Committee) shall provide diligent, independent and public oversight of all expenditures of Measure funds by Authority or recipient agencies (County, cities and towns, transit operators, etc). The Committee will report to the public and focus its oversight on the: • Review of allocation and expenditure of Measure funds to ensure that all funds are used consistent with the Measure. • Review of fiscal audits of Measure expenditures. • Review of performance audits of projects and programs relative to performance criteria established by the Authority, and if performance of any project or program does not meet its established performance criteria, identify reasons why and make recommendations for corrective actions that can be taken by the Authority Board for changes to project or program guidelines. • Review of application of the Performance-based Review policy • Review of the maintenance of effort compliance requirements of local jurisdictions for local streets, roads and bridges funding. • Review of each jurisdiction’s Growth Management Checklist and compliance with the Growth Management Plan policies. The Committee shall prepare an annual report including an account of the Committee’s activities during the previous year, its review and recommendations relative to fiscal or performance audits, and any recommendations made to the TAxpAyer sAFeguArds And AccounTABILITy 2524 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 305 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Authority Board for implementing the expenditure plan. The report will be noticed in local media outlets throughout Contra Costa County, posted to the Authority Website and made continuously available for public inspection at Authority offices. The report shall be composed of easy to understand language not in an overly technical format. The Committee shall make an annual presentation to the Authority Board summarizing the annual report subsequent to its release. Committee members shall be selected to reflect community, business organizations and other interests within the County. The goal of the membership makeup of the Public Oversight Committee is to provide a balance of viewpoints including but not limited to geography, age, gender, ethnicity and income status to represent the different perspectives of the residents of Contra Costa County. One member will be nominated by each of the four subregions with the RTPC representing the subregion nominating the member. The Board of Supervisors will nominate four members, with each of these four members residing in and representing one of the county’s four subregions. Eight members will be nominated by each respective organization detailed here, with each having one representative: League of Women’s Voters, Contra Costa Taxpayers Association, East Bay Leadership Council, Building and Construction Trades Council, Central Labor Council, Paratransit Coordinating Council, Bike East Bay, and environmental and/or open space organizations operating in Contra Costa County (specific organization may vary during the life of the measure). About one half of the initial member appointments will be for two years and the remaining appointments will be for three year terms. Thereafter, members will be appointed to two year terms. Any individual member can serve on the Committee for no more than 6 consecutive years. Committee members will be Contra Costa County residents who are not elected officials at any level of government or public employees from agencies that either oversee or benefit from the proceeds of the Measure. Membership is restricted to individuals with no economic interest in any of Authority’s projects or programs. If a member’s status changes so that he/she no longer meet these requirements, or if a member resigns his/her position on the Committee, the Authority Board will issue a new statement of interest from the same stakeholder category to fill the vacant position. The Committee shall meet up to once a month to carry out its responsibility, and shall meet at least once every 3 months. Meetings shall be held at the same location as the Authority Board meetings are usually held, shall be open to the public and must be held in compliance with California’s open meeting law (Brown Act). Meetings shall be recorded and the recordings shall be posted for the public. Members are expected to attend all meetings. If a member, without good reason acceptable to the Chair of the Committee, fails to attend either (a) two or more consecutive meetings or (b) more than 3 meetings a year, the Authority Board will request a replacement from the stakeholder categories listed above. The Authority commits to support the oversight process through cooperation with the Committee by providing access to project and program information, audits, and other information available to the Authority, and with logistical support so that the Committee may effectively perform its oversight function. The Committee will have full access to Authority’s independent auditors, and may request Authority staff briefings for any information that is relevant to the Measure. The Committee Chair shall inform the Authority Board Chair and Executive Director of any concern regarding Authority staff’s commitment to open communication, the timely sharing of information, and teamwork. The Committee shall not have the authority to set policy or appropriate or withhold funds, nor shall it participate in or interfere with the selection process of any consultant or contractor hired to implement the expenditure plan. The Committee shall not receive monetary compensation except for the reimbursement of travel or other incidental expenses, in a manner consistent with other Authority advisory committees In order to ensure that the oversight by the Committee continues to be as effective as possible, the efficacy of the Committee’s Charter (i.e. this document) will be evaluated on a periodic basis and a formal review will be conducted by the Authority Board, Executive Director and the Committee a minimum of every five years to determine if any amendments 2524 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 306 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube to this Charter should be made. The formal review will include a benchmarking of the Committee’s activities and charter with other best-in-class oversight committees. Amendments to this Charter shall be proposed by the Committee and adopted or rejected by the Authority Board. The Committee replaces the Authority’s existing Citizens Advisory Committee. Advisory Committees The Authority will continue the committees that were established as part of the Transportation Partnership Commission organization as well as other committees that have been utilized by the Authority to advise and assist in policy development and implementation. The committees include: The Regional Transportation Planning Committees that were established to develop transportation plans on a geographic basis for sub-areas of the County, and • The Technical Coordinating Committee that will serve as the Authority’s technical advisory committee. • The Paratransit Coordinating Council • The Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee • Bus Transit Coordinating Committee Implementing Guidelines This Transportation Expenditure Plan (Plan) is guided by principles that ensure the revenue generated by the sales tax is spent only for the purposes outlined in this Plan in the most efficient and effective manner possible, consistent with serving the transportation needs of Contra Costa County. The following Implementing Guidelines shall govern the administration of sales tax revenues by the Authority. Additional detail for certain Implementing Guidelines is found elsewhere in this Plan. Duration of the Plan The duration of the Plan shall be for 30 years from April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2047. Administration of the Plan 1. Funds only Projects and Programs in the Plan: Funds collected under this Measure may only be spent for purposes identified in the Plan, as it may be amended by the Authority governing body. Identification of Projects or Programs in the Plan does not ensure their implementation. As authorized, the Authority may amend or delete Projects and Programs identified in the Plan, including to provide for the use of additional federal, state and local funds, to account for unexpected revenue, to maintain consistency with the current Contra Costa Countywide Transportation Plan, to take into consideration unforeseen circumstances, and to account for impacts, alternatives, and potential mitigation determined during review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) at such time as each Project and Program is proposed for approval. 2. All Decisions Made in Public Process: The Authority is given the fiduciary duty of administering the transportation sales tax proceeds in accordance with all applicable laws and with the Plan. Activities of the Authority will be conducted in public according to state law, through publically noticed meetings. The annual budgets of Authority, strategic plans and annual reports will all be prepared for public review. The interest of the public will be further protected by a Public Oversight Committee, described previously in the Plan. 2726 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 307 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube 3. Salary and Administration Cost Caps: Revenues may be expended by the Authority for salaries, wages, benefits, overhead and those services including contractual services necessary to administer the Measure; however, in no case shall the expenditures for the salaries and benefits of the staff necessary to perform administrative functions for the Authority exceed one half percent (0.5%) of revenues from the Measure. The allocated costs of Authority staff who directly implement specific projects or programs are not included in the administrative costs. 4. Expenditure Plan Amendments Require Majority Support: The Authority may review and propose amendments to the Expenditure Plan and the Growth Management Program to provide for the use of additional federal, state and local funds, to account for unexpected revenues, or to take into consideration unforeseen circumstances. Affected Regional Transportation Planning Committee(s) will participate in the development of the proposed amendment(s). A majority of the Authority Board is required to approve an amendment and all jurisdictions within the county will be given a 45 day period to comment on any proposed Expenditure Plan amendment. 5. Augment Transportation Funds: Funds generated pursuant to the Measure are to be used to supplement and not replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes. Any funds already allocated, committed or otherwise included in the financial plan for any project in the Plan shall be made available for project development and implementation as required in the project’s financial and implementation program. 6. Jurisdiction: The Authority retains sole discretion regarding interpretation, construction, and meaning of words and phrases in the Transportation Expenditure Plan. Taxpayer Safeguards, Audits and Accountability 7. Public Oversight Committee: The Public Oversight Committee will provide diligent, independent and public oversight of all expenditures of Measure funds by Authority or recipient agencies (County, cities and towns, transit operators, etc). The Committee will report to the public and focus its oversight on annual audits, the review and allocation of Measure funds, the performance of projects and programs in the Plan, and compliance by local jurisdictions with the maintenance of effort and Growth Management Program described previously in the Plan 8. Fiscal Audits: All Funds expended by Authority directly and all funds allocated by formula or discretionary grants to other entities are subject to fiscal audit. Recipients of Local Streets Maintenance & Improvements, Bus Transit and Other Non-Rail Transit Enhancements, or Transportation for Seniors & People With Disabilities programs funding (including but not limited to County, cities and towns and transit operators) will be audited at least once every five (5) years, conducted by an independent CPA. Any agency found to be in non-compliance shall have its formula sales tax funds withheld, until such time as the agency is found to be in compliance. 9. Performance Audits: The following funding categories shall be subject to performance audits by the Authority: Local Streets Maintenance and Improvements, Major Streets/Complete Streets/Traffic Signal Synchronization Program, Bus Transit and Other Non-Rail Transit Enhancements, Transportation for Seniors and People with Disabilities, Safe Transportation for Children, Intercity Rail and Ferry Service, Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Trail Facilities, Community Development Transportation Program, and Innovative Transportation Technology/ Connected Communities Program. Each year, the Authority shall select and perform a focused performance audit on two or three of the funding categories listed above, so that at the end of the fourth year all funding categories listed above are audited. This process shall commence two years after passage of the new sales tax measure. Additional Performance Audits shall continue on a similar cycle for the duration of the Plan. The performance audits shall provide an accurate quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the funding categories to determine the effectiveness in meeting the performance criteria established by the Authority. In the event that any performance audit determines that a funding category is not meeting the performance requirements 2726 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 308 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube established by the Authority, the audit shall include recommendations for corrective action including but not limited to revisions to Authority policies or program guidelines that govern the expenditure of funds. 10. Maintenance of Effort (MOE): Funds generated by the new sales tax Measure are to be used to supplement and not replace existing local revenues used for streets and highways purposes. The basis of the MOE requirement will be the average of expenditures of annual discretionary funds on streets and highways, as reported to the Controller pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2151 for the three most recent fiscal years before the passage of the Measure where data is available. The average dollar amount will then be increased once every three years by the construction cost index of that third year. Penalty for non-compliance of meeting the minimum MOE is immediate loss of all Local Streets Maintenance and Improvements funds until MOE compliance is achieved. The audit of the MOE contribution shall be at least once every five years. Any agency found to be in non-compliance shall be subject to annual audit for three years after they come back into compliance. Any local jurisdiction wishing to adjust its maintenance of effort requirement shall submit to the Authority a request for adjustment and the necessary documentation to justify the adjustment. The Authority staff shall review the request and shall make a recommendation to the Authority. Taking into consideration the recommendation, the Authority may adjust the annual average of expenditures reported pursuant to Streets and Highways Code Section 2151. The Authority shall make an adjustment if one or more of the following conditions exists: 1. The local jurisdiction has undertaken one or more major capital projects during those fiscal years, that required accumulating unrestricted revenues (i.e., revenues that are not restricted for use on streets and highways such as general funds) to support the project during one or more fiscal years. 2. A source of unrestricted revenue used to support the major capital project or projects is no longer available to the local jurisdiction and the local jurisdiction lacks authority to continue the unrestricted funding source. 3. One or more sources of unrestricted revenues that were available to the local jurisdiction is producing less than 95 percent of the amount produced in those fiscal years, and the reduction is not caused by any discretionary action of the local jurisdiction. 4. The local jurisdiction Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is 70 or greater, as calculated by the jurisdiction Pavement Management System and reported to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission. 11. Annual Budget and Strategic Plan: Each year, the Authority will adopt an annual budget that estimates expected sales tax receipts, other anticipated revenue and planned expenditures for the year. On a periodic basis, the Authority will also prepare a Strategic Plan which will identify the priority for projects; the date for project implementation based on project readiness and availability of project funding; the state, federal and other local funding committed for project implementation, and other relevant criteria. The annual budget and Strategic Plan will be adopted by the Authority Board at a public meeting. 12. Requirements for Fund Recipients: All recipients of funds allocated in this expenditure plan will be required to sign a Master Cooperative Agreement that defines reporting and accountability elements and as well as other applicable policy requirements. All funds will be appropriated through an open and transparent public process. 13. Geographic Equity: The proposed projects and programs to be funded through the Plan constitute a “balanced” distribution of funding allocations to each subregion in Contra Costa County. However, through the course of the Measure, if any of the projects prove to be infeasible or cannot be implemented, the affected subregion may request that the Authority reassign funds to another project in the same subregion, as detailed in an Authority Fund Allocations policy, and to maintain a “balanced” distribution of funding allocations to each subregion. 2928 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 309 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Restrictions On Funds 14. Expenditure Shall Benefit Contra Costa County: Under no circumstance may the proceeds of this transportation sales tax be applied for any purpose other than for transportation improvements benefitting residents of Contra Costa County. Under no circumstance may these funds be appropriated by the State of California or any other local government agency as defined in the implementing guidelines. 15. Environmental Review: All projects funded by sales tax proceeds are subject to laws and regulations of federal, state, and local government, including the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Prior to approval or commencement of any project or program included in the Plan, all necessary environmental review required by CEQA shall be completed. 16. Performance-based Project Review: Before the allocation of any measure funds for the construction of a project with an estimated capital cost in excess of $25 million (or elements of a corridor project with an overall estimated cost in excess of $25 million), the Authority will: 1) verify that the project is consistent with the approved Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP), as it may be amended, 2) verify that the project is included in the Regional Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy, and 3) require the project sponsor to complete a performance based review of project alternatives prior to the selection of a preferred alternative. Said performance based review will include, but not necessarily be limited to, an analysis of the project impacts on greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle miles travelled, goods movement effectiveness, travel mode share, delay (by mode), safety, maintenance of the transportation system and consistency with adopted Authority plans. The Authority may require the evaluation of other performance criteria depending on the specific need and purpose of the project. When appropriate, the Authority will encourage project sponsors to identify and select a project alternative that reduces greenhouse gas emissions as well as vehicle miles travelled per capita. The Authority will also prioritize and reward high performing projects by leveraging additional regional and other funding sources. The Authority shall adopt detailed guidelines for evaluating project performance and applying performance criteria in the review and selection of a preferred project alternative no later than October 1, 2018. 17. Countywide Transportation Plan: State law allows each county in the San Francisco Bay Area that is subject to the jurisdiction of the regional transportation planning agency to prepare a Countywide Transportation Plan (CTP) for the county and cities within the county. Both Measure C and Measure J also require the Authority to prepare and periodically update a CTP for Contra Costa. State law also created an inter-dependent relationship between the CTP and regional planning agency. Each CTP must consider the region’s most recently adopted Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) while the adopted CTPs must form the “primary basis” for the next RTP and SCS. The Authority shall follow applicable statutes and the most current guidelines for preparing the CTP, as established and periodically updated by the regional transportation planning agency. The Authority shall also use the CTP to convey the Authority’s investment priorities, consistent with the long-range vision of the RTP and SCS. 18. Complete Streets: The Authority has adopted a policy requiring all recipients of funding through this Plan to consider and accommodate, wherever possible, the needs of all users in the planning, design, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation and maintenance of the transportation system. Achieving this vision will require balancing the needs of different users, and may require reallocating existing right of way for different uses. 19. Compliance with the Growth Management Program: If the Authority determines that a jurisdiction does not comply with the requirements of the Growth Management Program, the Authority shall withhold funds and also make a finding that the jurisdiction shall not be eligible to receive Local Streets Maintenance & Improvements or Community Development Transportation Program (CDTP) funding until the Authority determines the jurisdiction has achieved compliance, as detailed in the Growth Management Program section of the Plan. 2928 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 310 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube 20. Local Contracting and Good Jobs: Authority will develop a policy supporting the hiring of local contractors and businesses, including policy requiring prevailing wages, apprenticeship programs for Contra Costa residents, and veteran hiring policy (such as the Helmets to Hardhats program) to the extent permitted by law. The Authority, will adopt the aforementioned policy for projects and programs funded by the measure no later than April 1, 2018. 21. New Agencies: New cities or new entities (such as new transit agencies) that come into existence in Contra Costa County during the life of the Plan may be considered as eligible recipients of funds through a Plan amendment. 22. Countywide Transit Plan: The Authority will develop a countywide transit plan identifying services and projects to be funded with this Measure. The plan will be inclusive of services and projects in adopted plans of existing transit operators which have gone through a public review process prior to adoption. The plan will be periodically reviewed and updated. Funding will be allocated by the Authority throughout the County based on input from each Regional Transportation Planning Committee and on performance criteria established by the Authority in consultation with local and regional bus transit operators, providers of alternate non-rail transportation, and stakeholders. Said performance criteria will include a review of impact on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Green-house Gas (GHG) and shall require a finding that any proposed new or enhanced services demonstrate the ability to improve regional and/or local mobility for Contra Costa residents. Project Financing Guidelines and Managing Revenue 23. Fiduciary Duty: Funds may be accumulated for larger or longer term projects. Interest income generated will be used for the purposes outlined in the Plan and will be subject to audits. 24. Project and Program Financing: The Authority has the authority to bond for the purposes of expediting the delivery of transportation projects and programs. The Authority will develop a policy to identify financing procedures for the entire plan of projects and programs. 25. Programming of Variations from the Expected Revenue: Actual revenues may, at times be higher or lower than expected in this Plan due to changes in receipts. Additional funds may become available due to the increased opportunities for leveraging or project costs being less than expected. Revenue may be lower than expected as the economy fluctuates. Determination of when the contingency funds become excess will be established by a policy defined by the Authority. Funds considered excess will be prioritized first to expenditure plan projects and programs, and second to other projects of regional significance that are consistent with the expenditure plan. The new project or program will be required to be amended into the expenditure plan. 26. Fund Allocations: Through the course of the Measure, if any of the projects do not require all funds programmed for that project or have excess funding, or should a planned project become undeliverable, infeasible or unfundable due to circumstances unforeseen at the time the expenditure plan was created, funding for that project will be reallocated to another project or program. The subregion where the project or program is located may request that the Authority reassign funds to another project in the same subregion. In the allocation of the released funds, the Authority in consultation with the subregion RTPC will in priority order consider: 1) a project or program of the same travel mode (i.e. transit, bicycle/pedestrian, or road) in the same subregion, 2) a project or program for other modes of travel in the same subregion, 3) other expenditure plan projects or programs, and 4) other projects or programs of regional significance. The new project or program or funding level may be required to be amended into the expenditure plan. 27. Leveraging Funds: Leveraging or matching of outside funding sources is strongly encouraged. Any additional transportation sales tax revenues made available through their replacement by matching funds will be spent based on the principles outlined for fund allocations described above. 3130 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 311 ccta.net f /Contra Costa Transportation Authority T @CCTA Y ccta.net/youtube Appendix Numbers in this chart are rounded for viewing simplicity. Table of Expenditure Plan Funding Allocations Distribution of Funding By Subregion Funding Category $ millions %Central Southwest West East (a)(b) (c)(d) BART Capacity, Access and Parking Improvements 300.00 10.44%88.10 57.38 69.77 84.75 Bus Transit Enhancements in West Contra Costa 110.55 3.84%110.55 Bus Transit and Other Non-Rail Transit Enhancements in Central, East and Southwest Contra Costa 184.40 6.42%61.45 61.45 61.50 East Contra Costa Transit Extension 70.00 2.44%70.00 High Capacity Transit Improvements along the I-80 Corridor 55.00 1.91%55.00 Intercity Rail and Ferry Service Improvements 50.00 1.74%8.00 35.00 7.00 Traffic Flow Improvements & High Capacity Transit Implementation Along I-680 & SR 24 250.00 8.70%125.00 125.00 East County Corridor (Vasco Rd and/or Byron Highway Corridors)117.00 4.07%117.00 Traffic Flow Improvements along SR 242 & SR 4 108.00 3.76%44.00 64.00 I-80 Interchange Improvements at San Pablo Dam Road and Central Avenue 60.00 2.09%60.00 Interstate 680 and State Route 4 Interchange Improvements 60.00 2.09%60.00 Local Street Maintenance and Improvements 663.50 23.09%191.96 147.53 145.63 178.38 Add'l Local Street Maintenance and Improvements 20.00 0.70%20.00 Transportation for Seniors and People with Disabilities 115.01 4.00%30.80 19.30 28.15 36.76 Safe Transportation for Children 63.96 2.23%8.72 20.03 26.12 9.09 Major Streets, Complete Streets and Traffic Synchronization Project Grants 290.00 10.09%108.40 46.40 56.60 78.60 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Trail Facilities 115.00 4.00%28.30 30.35 26.41 29.94 Community Development Transportation Program 100.00 3.48%25.26 16.45 20.00 38.29 Innovative Transportation Technology / Connected Communities Grant Program 65.00 2.26%22.10 11.00 16.70 15.20 Transportation Planning, Facilities & Services 43.05 1.50%12.64 8.23 10.02 12.16 Regional Transportation Priorities 18.70 0.65%5.00 3.70 5.00 5.00 Administration 14.35 0.50%4.20 2.75 3.35 4.05 TOTAL 2873.52 100.0%843.93 549.57 668.30 811.72 Population Based Share 2873.5 843.88 549.58 668.33 811.73 Population Share (2030 Estimate) of Total 29.37%19.12%23.26%28.25% 3130 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 312 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 313 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 314 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 315 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPOINT Kathryn Ames to the Member at Large Seat #17 on the Advisory Council on Aging (ACOA), as recommended by the Family and Human Services Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Ms. Ames was interviewed and approved by the ACOA Membership Committee on 4/20/2016 to fill the Member At-Large #17 seat on the ACOA with a term ending 9/30/2018. Ms. Ames submitted an application for ACOA membership dated 2/17/2016. The Advisory Council on Aging provides a means for countywide planning, cooperation and coordination for individuals and groups interested in improving and developing services and opportunities for the older residents of the County. The Council provides leadership and advocacy on behalf of older persons and serves as a channel of communication and information on aging. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Member at Large Seat 17 will remain vacant. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres, (925) 313-1717 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 21 To:Board of Supervisors From:FAMILY & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Appointment to the Advisory Council on Aging AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 316 CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS Ames redacted AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 317 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES318 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES319 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES320 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE the new medical staff and Travis resident appointments and reappointments, additional privileges, department change request, medical staff advancement, and updated Pediatrics privilege as recommend by the Health Services Director and by the Medical Staff Executive Committee at their June 20, 2016 meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: Not Applicable BACKGROUND: The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations has requested that evidence of Board of Supervisors approval for each Medical Staff member be placed in his or her Credentials File. A revised re-entry plan is to accommodate policy changes. The above recommendations for appointment/reappointment were reviewed by the Credentials Committee and approved by the Medical Executive Committee. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Contra Costa Regional Medical and APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: T Scott, M Wilhelm, S Salman C. 20 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Medical Staff Appointments and Reappointments – July 2016 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 321 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: (CONT'D) Contra Costa Health Centers' medical staff would not be appropriately credentialed; and along with the privilege form, they would not be in compliance with the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Attachment 2 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 322 MEC Recommendations –July 2016 Definitions: A=Active C=Courtesy Aff=Affliate P/A= Provisional Active P/C= Provisional Courtesy Page 1 A. New Medical Staff Members Naushad Amin, MD Hospitalist Talia Firestein, MD Family Medicine Ava Moskin, MD Family Medicine Rebecca Sonu, MD Pathology Robert Streett, MD Psychiatry/Psychology Xingbo Sun, DPM Surgery (Podiatry) Yujie Xu, MD Pathology B. New Teleradiologist Staff Members Steven Lengle, MD Diagnostic Imaging Alan Pratt, MD Diagnostic Imaging C. Travis Residents – Family Medicine Alice Deden, MD Mark Prats, MD D. Request for Additional Privileges Department Requesting Elizabeth Berryman, MD Family Medicine Post Graduation FM, ED Christina Gomez-Mira, M Family Medicine Post Graduation FM Tamara McBride, MD Family Medicine Post Graduation FM Mana Prinia, DO Family Medicine Post Graduation FM Katherine Rausa, MD IM-Nephrology MED 1 and MED 2 Marcie Richmond, MD Family Medicine Post Graduation Hospitalist and OB E. Request for Department Change Previous Primary Department Requesting Primary Department Elizabeth Berryman, MD Family Medicine Emergency Medicine F. Advance to Non-Provisional Amy Gordon, MD Family Medicine Scott Karpowicz, MD Family Medicine Stephen Merjavy, MD Hospitalist Joachim Raese, MD Psychiatry/Psychology Naima Rehman, MD Family Medicine Yana Wirengard, MD Surgery G. Biennial Reappointments Tarun Bhandari, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A Frank Camodeca, DDS Dental Admin Jeffrey Chen, MD Psychiatry/Psychology C Michelle Clark, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A Stephen Daniels, MD Family Medicine A Hala Fattah, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A Arianne Ferguson, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A Wayne Garrett, DO Pathology C Vasanta Giri, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 323 MEC Recommendations –July 2016 Definitions: A=Active C=Courtesy Aff=Affliate P/A= Provisional Active P/C= Provisional Courtesy Page 2 Nicole Hickey, MD Internal Medicine P Theresa Kailikole, DPM Surgery - Podiatry A Jeremy Lieb, MD Surgery - Urology P Daniel Lively, MD Internal Medicine -OP A Steven Merjavy, MD Family Medicine P Patrik Munzar, MD Psychiatry/Psychology A Bennet Omalu, MD Pathology C Leena Ray, MD Internal Medicine-Neph C Marcie Richmond, MD Family Medicine P Lawrence Thompson, MD Pathology C Daniel Thwaites, MD Family Medicine A Leonid Treyger, MD Family Medicine P Ashley Tyrrel, MD Pediatrics P Takenori Watanabe, MD Family Medicine A H. Biennial Renew of Privileges Rebecca A Arcos, NP Pediatrics Alberto G Hernandez, NP Pediatrics Analisa Loewen, NP Family Medicine Diana McDonald, NP Pediatrics I. Voluntary Resignations Christopher Camilleri, MD Psychiatry/Psychology Deepak Kumar, MD Psychiatry/Psychology Kaitlyn Van Arsdell, MD Family Medicine AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 324 Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Pediatrics Privileges Request Form D CA Lic.N/A N/A C 10 1 case in last 2 years U 15 5 cases in last 2 years D CA Lic.N/A N/A U CA Lic.10 2 cases in last 4 years D CA Lic.N/A N/A U CA Lic.N/A 2 cases in last 4 yrs. or inservice in last 2 yrs. C CA Lic.N/A N/A U CA Lic.N/A 1 year in last 4 yrs. C CA Lic.N/A N/A U CA Lic.N/A 1 year in last 4 yrs. Departments (s)ANE CC DEN DIA EME FAM GER HOSP MED OBG PED SGN ANE 3 Moderate (Conscious) Sedation* Does NOT include use of ketamine or propofol. CA Lic. If performed outside of Hospital: ANE11, Inservice or ACLS required) Pediatrics Practitioner Name: ___________________________________ GrantedD= Denied P= Pending CNM=Criteria Not Met Training/ Education D= With Direct Supervision C= With Consultation U= Unrestricted NumberPrivilege Descriptions D/C/U Experience Current CompetencePED RequestedFAM PED PED 1 Outpatient Care Including Healthcare Maintenance and Preoperative H&P 0 - 36 Months FAM PED PED 2 Outpatient Care Including Healthcare Maintenance and Preoperative H&P 36 Months - 21 Years Old Interosseous Line PlacementEME 11 ANE CC EME HOSP IM PED SGN ANE 11 Endotracheal Intubation* * Separate proctoring required PEDS updated July 2016 Page 1 of 4AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 325 Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Pediatrics Privileges Request Form Departments (s)Pediatrics Practitioner Name: ___________________________________ GrantedD= Denied P= Pending CNM=Criteria Not Met Training/ Education D= With Direct Supervision C= With Consultation U= Unrestricted NumberPrivilege Descriptions D/C/U Experience Current Competence RequestedC CA Lic.N/A N/A FP N/A 10 cases in last 2 yrs. PEDS N/A 5 cases in last 2 yrs. C CA Lic.N/A N/A U CA Lic.20 3 cases in last 2 yrs C CA Lic.N/A N/A U CA Lic.20 3 cases in last 2 years C FP or PEDS (requires current cert in AAP/AHA NRP) N/A N/A U FP or PEDS (requires current cert in AAP/AHA NRP) 30 10 cases in last 2 years FAM HOSP PED PED 12 Care of Newborns with Complicated but Non- life-threatening Problems (e.g. low birth weight, but > 2000gms.; total bilirubin <18mg%, transient hypoglycemia not requiring IV therapy; suspected sepsis or temperature instability, congenital anomalies without distress, anemia, uncomplicated TTN). Inpatient Uncomplicated Newborn Care (e.g. normal term newborn and those with indirect bilirubin <15mg%); including Frenotomy FAM PED PED 5 General Inpatient Care Including Healthcare Maintenance, Excluding All Cases Where Expected Improvement is Not Soon Apparent or when Specialized Therapeutic or Diagnostic Techniques are Needed. 0 -18 Years Old Neonatology U Care of Newborns: including those with potentially life-threatening illnesses, e.g. newborns less than 35 weeks gestation, requiring >40% FiO2 or pCO2 > 50 Torr, mechanical ventilation, infants with shock, seizures, polytcythemia requiring partial exchange transfusion or with life-threatening congenital anomalies (requires current certification in AAP/AHA Neonatal Resuscitation Program) FAM HOSP PED PED 11 PED PED 13 * Separate proctoring required PEDS updated July 2016 Page 2 of 4AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 326 Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Pediatrics Privileges Request Form Departments (s)Pediatrics Practitioner Name: ___________________________________ GrantedD= Denied P= Pending CNM=Criteria Not Met Training/ Education D= With Direct Supervision C= With Consultation U= Unrestricted NumberPrivilege Descriptions D/C/U Experience Current Competence RequestedD FP or PEDS (requires current cert in AAP/AHA NRP) N/A N/A U FP or PEDS (requires current cert in AAP/AHA NRP) 25 10 cases in last 2 years D CA Lic.N/A N/A U CA Lic.5 3 cases in last 4 years or inservice D CA Lic.N/A N/A U FP or PEDS 5 1 case or inservice in last 4 yrs. D FP or PEDS N/A N/A U PEDS 5 1 case or inservice in last 4 yrs. D FP or PEDS N/A N/A U PEDS 200 20 cases in last 2 yrs. Umbilical Artery and Vein Catheter Placement* Pediatric Procedures PED PED 16 PED PED 19 Pediatric Echocardiogram Interpretation. PED 15 Lumbar Puncture and Bladder Catheterization. PED PED 18 Needle Thoracostomy or Thoracentesis, Chest Tube Placement. PED PED 17 Attendance for the Neonate at Deliveries (requires current certification in AAP/AHA Neonatal Resuscitation Program). PED * Separate proctoring required PEDS updated July 2016 Page 3 of 4AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 327 Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Pediatrics Privileges Request Form Departments (s)Pediatrics Practitioner Name: ___________________________________ GrantedD= Denied P= Pending CNM=Criteria Not Met Training/ Education D= With Direct Supervision C= With Consultation U= Unrestricted NumberPrivilege Descriptions D/C/U Experience Current Competence RequestedD FP or PEDS N/A N/A U PEDS 250 200 cases in last 4 years Signature of Department Chairperson Date ____________________________________________________ I certify that I have reviewed the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center Privilege Criteria, and that I meet the specified criteria for education/training, experience, and current competence for the privileges that I have indicated above. Signature of Requesting Practitioner Date ____________________________________________________ Pediatric EKG Interpretation (official report). PED 20PED * Separate proctoring required PEDS updated July 2016 Page 4 of 4AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 328 RECOMMENDATION(S): RE-APPOINT Jannel George-Oden of San Pablo to the Tenant seat on the Contra Costa County Housing Authority Board of Commissioners, to a new two-year term ending on March 31, 2018, as requested by the Housing Authority Executive Director. FISCAL IMPACT: Commissioners may receive compensation for attendance at up to four meetings of the Authority per month. Compensation is fixed at a rate of $50 per day. Commissioners may receive necessary traveling and subsistence expenses incurred in the discharge of their duties. All compensation is paid from the Housing Authority budget. There is no impact to the County General Fund. BACKGROUND: The Housing Authority needs to fill one vacant tenant position on its Board of Commissioners. Housing Commissioners should have the following characteristics for the effective functioning of the Board of Commissioners: APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea 925.335.1077 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 , County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 18 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:NOMINATION TO THE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 329 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) 1. Must have an earnest interest in the affordable housing needs of low-income families throughout Contra Costa County. 2. Must be dedicated to the mission of the Housing Authority, which is to provide high-quality affordable housing solutions and promote self-sufficiency for low-income persons of Contra Costa County 3. Must be willing and able to attend and participate in the following key activities: Affordable housing solutions Monthly Board of Commissioner meetings Periodic commissioner training seminars as needed to assist the commissioners in performing their oversight duties. 4. Must be willing to become knowledgeable about the activities, policies, and practices of the Housing Authority and be able to effectively deliberate on matters brought before the Board of Commissioners. 5. Must be able to work cooperatively with other Board members, the Executive Director, and Housing Authority staff. In early 2014, the Housing Authority solicited applicants from its Resident Advisory Board, active resident councils, Section 8 Family Self-sufficiency clients and at its senior properties to fill two vacancies on the Board of Commissioners. A total of 23 applications were received. A first round of screening removed any persons in bad standing with the Housing Authority or any applicants who had moved from the Housing Authority's jurisdiction. Pursuant to then-Chair Mitchoff’s instructions, a panel was convened in March 2014 to interview all remaining applicants. The panel was composed of Joseph Villarreal, the Housing Authority’s Executive Director, Keiko Kobayashi, the Housing Authority’s primary Counsel, and Julie DiMaggio Enea, a Senior Deputy with the County Administrator's Office. Ms. George-Oden of San Pablo (formerly of Antioch) was selected from the 2014 recruitment for appointment to the Tenant seat and has served a partial term from May 2015 through March 2016. The Housing Authority Executive Director recommends Ms. George-Oden for reappointment to a new two year term, to expire on March 31, 2018. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Disapproval of the nomination would prolong the vacancy in a Tenant seat and not provide representation of Housing Authority clients on the Board of Commissioners as required by law. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS Candidate Application_HACCC_Jannel George-Oden AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 330 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 331 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 332 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the resignation of the following person, DECLARE a vacancy in the Appointee 5 Seat on the County Service Area P-5 Citizens Advisory Committee, effective August 1, 2016, and DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to post the vacancy, as recommended by Supervisor Candace Andersen: Gordon Berke Alamo, CA 94507 FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Established on April 18, 1972, by Resolution Number 72/257, the purpose of the County Service Area P-5 Citizen Advisory Committee is to act as a liaison between the citizens of the P-5 Police District and the Office of the Sheriff of Contra Costa County by: Advising the Board of Supervisors and the Office of the Sheriff of the community's needs and desires regarding police protection; Promoting public safety in the areas of home safety, traffic safety, vacation security and crime prevention through the neighborhood watch program; and maintaining oversight of expenditures of the public funds accruing in the P-5 Police District. Mr. Berke has moved from the Roundhill community, therefore no longer is able to serve. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jill Ray, 925-957-8860 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: District 2 Supervisor, Maddy Book, CSA P-5 CAC, Appointee C. 19 To:Board of Supervisors From:Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:RESIGNATION FROM THE COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-5 CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 333 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The seat will remain filled without the benefit of the appointee in attendance at meetings, which could create a quorum issue. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Vacancy Notice AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 334 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES335 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE Appropriations Adjustment No. 5001 transferring appropriations in the amount of $250,000 from the County's Contingency Reserve (0990) to the County Administrator's budget (0003) to pay for legal services in connection with the County of San Joaquin, et al. v. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, et al. (San Joaquin Co. Super. Ct. Case No. STK-CV-UWM-2016-3596) litigation. FISCAL IMPACT: $250,000, 100% County General Fund. Under the related legal services contract, the County and Contra Costa County Water Agency will be jointly responsible for paying one-third of the fees charged by the law firm and one-third of costs incurred in this case. The other two participating public agencies will each be responsible for one-third of fees charged and costs incurred. BACKGROUND: The County and the Water Agency are petitioners in the lawsuit County of San Joaquin, et al. v. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, et al. (San Joaquin Co. Super. Ct. Case No. STK-CV-UWM-2016-3596), filed April 14, 2016. On May 10, 2016, the Board of Supervisors authorized the County Counsel to execute two agreements in connection with the lawsuit: (1) a joint representation and cost allocation agreement, executed by all six petitioners in the case – Contra Costa County, the Contra APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Julie DiMaggio Enea (925) 335-1077 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 22 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Payments for Legal Services in County of San Joaquin, et al. v. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, et al AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 336 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Costa County Water Agency, San Joaquin County, Central Delta Water Agency, the Planning and Conservation League, and Food & Water Watch; and (2) a contract for legal services with the law firm of Shore, McKinley & Conger, LLP, to represent the four public agencies in the lawsuit. Under this contract, the County and Water Agency are jointly responsible for paying one-third of the fees charged by the firm and one-third of costs incurred in this case. The other two public agencies will each be responsible for one-third of fees charged and costs incurred. The requested budget adjustment will appropriate funds to the County Administrator's budget to pay County Counsel costs and invoices from Shore, McKinley & Conger, LLP, in a total amount not to exceed $250,000. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS AP00 5001 Payments for Legal Services MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Signed Appropriation Adj 5001 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 337 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY APPROPRIATION ADJUSTMENTI ALLOCATION ADJUSTMENT T/C-27 AUDITOR-CONTROLLER USE ONLY: FINAL APPROVAL NEEDED BY: [gI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS o COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR o AUDITOR-CONTROLLER ACCOUNT CODING DEPARTMENT: GF CONT RESERVE 0990/ COUNTY ADMIN 0003 ORGANIZATION EXPENDITURE SUB-ACCOUNT EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION <DECREASE> INCREASE 0990 1227 1227 6301 2310 2340 Apportion for Contingencies Professional/Specialized Services Other Interdepartmental Charges APPROVED AUDITOR -CONTROLLER By: _~ Date 111~;'''' COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR By: __ BOARD OF SUPERVISORS YES: NO: By: ________ _ (M 129 Rev. 6/09) Date __ Date ___ _ EXPLANATION OF REQUEST Transfer appropriations from the Contingency Reserve to the County Administrator to provide towards the County's share of legal costs in the County of San Joaquin, et al. vs. Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, et al. litigation, as approved by the Board of May 10, 2016. PREPARED BY: Julie DiMaggio Enea TITLE: Sr. Deputy County Administrator DATE: 7/12/2016 APPROPRIATION APOO S DOl ADJ. JOURNAL NO . AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 338 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES339 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT an amendment to the County's adopted 2016 Federal Platform to include support for legislation that would create a new category of private activity bonds in the federal tax code for governments to join with private parties to help finance government buildings, as recommended by the Legislation Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: No immediate fiscal impact in adopting the amendment to the Federal Platform. BACKGROUND: At its July 11, 2016 meeting, the Legislation Committee considered the recommendation from the County Administrator's staff to amend the County's adopted 2016 Federal Platform to include support for legislation that would create a new category of private activity bonds for governments to join with private parties to help finance government buildings. An amendment to the Federal Platform would allow the County to support legislation such as H.R.5361 which was introduced in House on May 26, 2016 and would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for the tax-exempt financing of certain government-owned buildings. The Public Buildings Renewal Act (H.R. 5361), introduced by Rep. Mike Kelly, R-Pa., would create a new category of private activity bonds for governments to join with private parties to help finance schools, medical facilities, police stations and other social infrastructure. The recently introduced bill, which has nine co-sponsors, would amend the federal tax code to provide another layer of tax-exempt financing that would encourage the use of public-private partnerships. Section 142 of the federal tax code includes 15 categories of "qualified" PABs, one of which is qualified public educational facilities. Kelly's legislation would add a 16th category for qualified government buildings. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 24 To:Board of Supervisors From:LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Amending adopted 2016 Federal Platform - Support for Private Activity Bonds for Government Buildings AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 340 H.R. 5361 defines qualified government buildings as an elementary or secondary school; public university buildings used for educational purposes; public libraries; courts; hospitals, health care facilities, laboratories and research buildings; public safety buildings including police and fire stations, medical facilities and jails; and government offices. The bonds would be exempt from state volume cap restrictions generally applied to PABS, and instead would be subject to a new, national cap of $5 billion. State and local governments would be required to submit a funding application to the Treasury Department that includes the amount requested; the governmental unit that will own the project; and a project description and timeline. Governments would also be required to provide anticipated funding sources and uses of funds for the project. Entities would be required to issue bonds in the amount allocated by Treasury within two years after the allocation date. If they fail to do so, the unused portion of the allocation would be revoked. The bill would exclude any retail food or beverage facilities or buildings used for recreation and entertainment, including private golf courses, country clubs, convention centers and sports arenas. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 341 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Proposed policy amendment for the Contra Costa County's 2016 Federal Platform: Private Activity Bonds for Government Buildings – The County will support legislation that would create a new category of private activity bonds for governments to join with private parties to help finance government buildings. The tax-exempt bonding mechanism would allow state and local governments to issue private activity bonds to finance the construction and upkeep of certain publicly owned buildings. The County will support amending the federal tax code to provide another layer of tax-exempt financing that would encourage the use of public-private partnerships. Attachment A includes a redlined version of the the amended Federal Platform (Policy Positions excerpt). Attachment B includes the text of H.R. 5361. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Contra Costa County would not have a position on the issue. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Adopted Federal Platform, redlined revision Attachment B: H.R. 5361 bill text AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 342 2016 Federal Legislative Platform Contra Costa County 9 providing federal resources to agencies in the Delta for economic development and environmental protection. Contra Costa County supports the legislation and participated in a feasibility study for the NHA through our seat on the Delta Protection Commission, which completed the study in 2012. Vasco Road-Byron Highway Connector – $30 million for design, engineering and construction of an east-west connector road between two major arterials that link Contra Costa County with Alameda and San Joaquin Counties. The Vasco Road-Byron Highway Connector will improve traffic circulation and linkages in the southeastern portion of the County and will provide a new route for truck traffic that will remove a significant portion of truck trips which currently pass through the rural community of Byron. Vasco Road is designated as State Route 84, and Byron Highway is under study as the potential alignment for future State Route 239. 2016 FEDERAL LEGISLATIVE PLATFORM POLICY POSITIONS The following support positions are listed in alphabetic order and do not reflect priority order. Please note that new and revised policy positions are highlighted. Affordable Housing and Homeless Programs –For Housing and Urban Development (HUD)’s Homeless Assistance Grants, the County will support funding that does not include set-asides or other requirements that limit local communities’ ability to respond to the particular needs in their areas. For the Housing Assistance for People with AIDS (HOPWA) program, the County will support legislation to update the formula used to allocate HOPWA grants to reflect local housing costs as well as the number of AIDS cases. The County supports full funding for HUD homeless assistance programs and funding for full implementation of the Homeless Emergency and Rapid Transition to Housing (HEARTH) Act of 2009. The County supports funding the National Affordable Housing Trust Fund. Resources made available through the Trust Fund should be accessible to local housing and community development agencies, including public housing authorities. The Housing Trust Fund should be used to complement and not supplant either the HOME or CDBG programs. Agricultural Pest and Disease Control – Agriculture and native environments in Contra Costa County continue to be threatened by a variety of invasive/exotic pests, diseases and non-native weeds. The Federal government provides funding for research, regulation, pest exclusion activities, survey and detection, pest management, weed control, public education and outreach. The County will support funding in all these areas for protection of our agricultural industry and open space. Consistent with the policy position, the County will also support legislation which would authorize and direct the USDA to provide state and local funding for High Risk Prevention programs (also called Pest Detection Funding). Beneficial Use of Dredged Materials – As the beneficial reuse of dredged materials has a clear public benefit, particularly in the Delta, the County will continue to support beneficial reuse in AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 343 10 general and also continue to advocate for funding for a federal study to determine the feasibility of beneficial reuse, considering the benefits and impacts to water quality and water supply in the Delta, navigation, flood control damage, ecosystem restoration, and recreation. The study would include the feasibility of using Sherman Island as a rehandling site for the dredged material, for levee maintenance and/or ecosystem restoration. Language to authorize the study was included in the Water Resources and Development Act (WRDA) which was passed into law on November 8, 2007. Broadband – Consistent with CSAC policy, Contra Costa County will support the expansion of broadband (high speed internet service) to drive economic development and job opportunities, support county service delivery, and improve health, education and public safety outcomes for residents. For communities to realize these full benefits of broadband it must be capable of supporting current technology. Access and adoption are both necessary elements that should be supported in state and federal legislative or regulatory proposals. This entails the following: • Establishing and maintaining reliable broadband in unserved or underserved communities; • Promoting the knowledge, skills and behaviors that comprise digital literacy; • Making broadband affordable for all households; • Maximizing funding for infrastructure; and • Reducing infrastructure deployment barriers. Child Care – Research continues to show that quality, affordable childcare is a necessity to ensuring a family’s stability and economic success. Currently in Contra Costa County, there are over 10,000 low-income children eligible for affordable childcare services, yet only 29% of that need is met. Research also shows that in addition to a child’s long-term success with school and employment, investing in high-quality early care and education results in a higher than average return on investments in the areas of crime reduction and positive health, education and economic outcomes. With regards to childcare, the County will support the President’s “Preschool for All” Initiative meant to close America’s school readiness gap and ensure all children have access to quality care by expanding high quality learning opportunities for children 0-5. This proposal includes:  An increase of over 100,000 new childcare slots and $12 billion over the next 10 years;  A focus on children and their families who are at or below 200% of poverty;  Financing through a new cost-sharing partnership with states, already a proven successful model with Head Start in Contra Costa County. The County will also advocate for the following federal actions:  Increase funding to support employment of low-income families through greater access to child care subsidies, and increase the access of children from eligible families to high- quality care that supports positive child development outcomes. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 344 2016 Federal Legislative Platform Contra Costa County 11  Provide flexibility at the state and local levels so that quality care can be balanced with access and parental choice. Child Support –The County will advocate for the following federal actions:  Eliminate the $25 fee for non-IV-A families.  Restore the incentive match payments that were prohibited in the Deficit Reduction Act.  Allow the automatic use of cash medical support to reimburse Medicaid expenditures.  Allow IV-D agencies to access Health Insurance records for the purposes of Medical Support. Child Welfare and Well-being –The County will advocate for the following federal actions:  Provide states with financial incentives, as opposed to monetary penalties, under the Child and Family Services Reviews and minimize the significant administrative burden associated with the review process.  End Title IV-E disallowances from federal audits that take away funds from an already resource-strapped child welfare system. Allow states to reinvest these funds in preventing child abuse and neglect.  Increase prevention dollars to help maintain children safely in their own homes. Federal funding currently gives disproportional support to out-of-home care rather than to preventing children from coming into care.  Any increase in Federal Medical Assistance Percentage should include an associated increase in the Title IV-E matching rate to help support children in foster care. Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs – The County’s ability to continue funding to a variety of nonprofit agencies that provide critical safety net services to lower income residents, including financing the development of affordable housing is threatened by further cuts as part of the Budget Control Act (Act) passed by Congress in July 2011. The Act established mandatory spending caps on most federal programs through 2021, and arranged additional across-the-board annual spending cuts to federal defense and non-defense discretionary (NDD) programs over this same period. Included in non-defense discretionary programs are critical local government oriented programs including the CDBG and HOME programs. These programs are successful and productive, leveraging significant funding from non-federal sources to help spur economic development. The County agrees that reducing the federal deficit is an important component of achieving long-term national economic stability, but targeting solely NDD programs like the CDBG and HOME programs will not achieve significant reductions and will hinder the County’s ability to provide AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 345 12 critical services to its most vulnerable populations. The County will continue to oppose any further reductions in the CDBG and HOME programs as part of the Budget Control Act or any other means. Cost Shifts to Local and State Government – Contra Costa County performs many of its services and programs pursuant to federal direction and funding. Other services and programs are performed at the behest of the state, which receives funding through the federal government. In the past, the Administration’s budget has contained significant cuts to entitlement programs and/or caps on entitlements. Such actions could shift cost of services from the federal government to the state and/or local governments (and to the extent that costs would shift to the state, it is highly likely that these would be passed on to the County). The County will oppose any actions that would result in cost shifts on federal entitlement programs or which would result on greater dependency on county funded programs. In addition, the County will support federal and state financial assistance to aid county and local government efforts to meet unfunded federal mandates, such as those contained in the National Response Plan (NRP), the National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP), and the National Incident Management System. Criminal Debt Collection – Nonpayment of court-ordered victim restitution, fines and fees is a problem of epidemic proportions for all jurisdictions. Literally billions of dollars go uncollected each year across the country, resulting not only in financial suffering of victims, but also the loss of public revenue. Many states already allow for the offset of State Tax Refunds, and these programs are successful in achieving revenue recovery. Federal Tax Refunds are already being successfully offset to pay for delinquent child support. The County will support amendments to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an offset against income tax refunds to pay for court-ordered debts that are past-due. Delta Water Platform To protect the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta from various detrimental forces that are affecting its health and resources, it is the policy of Contra Costa County to support implementation of projects and actions that will help improve the Delta ecosystem and the economic conditions of the Delta. Contra Costa County has developed a Delta Water Platform to identify and promote activities and policy positions that support the creation of a healthy Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. Contra Costa County will use this Platform to guide its own actions and advocacy in other public venues regarding the future of the Delta. Designation of Indian Tribal Lands and Indian Gaming – The Board of Supervisors has endorsed the California State Association of Counties’ (CSAC) policy documents regarding development on tribal land and prerequisites to Indian gaming. These policy statements address local government concerns for such issues as the federal government’s ability to take lands into trust and thus remove them from local land use jurisdiction, absent the consent of the state and the affected county; the need for tribes to be responsible for all off-reservation impacts of their actions; and assurance that local government will be able to continue to meet its governmental responsibilities for the health, safety, environment, infrastructure and general welfare of all members of its communities. The County will continue to advocate for federal legislation and regulation that supports the CSAC policy documents. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 346 2016 Federal Legislative Platform Contra Costa County 13 The County will also advocate for limitations on reservation shopping; tightening the definition of Class II gaming machines; assuring protection of the environment and public health and safety; and full mitigation of the off-reservation impacts of the trust land and its operations, including the increased cost of services and lost revenues to the County. The County will also advocate for greater transparency, accountability and appeal opportunities for local government in the decision-making processes that permit the establishment of Indian gaming facilities. This includes sequencing the processes so that the Indian Lands Determination comes first, prior to initiation of a trust land request and associated environmental review. The County will also consider support for federal action and/or legislation that allows Class III gaming at the existing gaming facility only if it can be shown that any change would result in a facility that would be unique in nature and the facility can demonstrate significant community benefits above and beyond the costs associated with mitigating community impacts. Economic Development Programs – Congress should fund all the complementary programs within HUD’s community and economic development toolkit, ensuring that HUD does not lose sight of the development component of its mission. To that end, the County will support continued funding for the Section 108 loan guarantee program, the Brownfields Economic Development Initiative and the Rural Housing and Economic Development program. Each of these programs plays a unique role in building stronger, more economically viable communities, while enabling communities to leverage external financing in a way the CDBG program alone cannot do. Federal “Statewideness” Requirements – For many federally funded programs, there is a “statewideness” requirement; i.e., all counties must operate the specific program under the same rules and regulations. This can hamper the County’s ability to meet local needs, to be cost effective and to leverage the funding of one program to reduce costs in another program. Contra Costa County cannot negotiate for federal waivers or do things differently because it is not a state, yet its population is greater than seven states. Recognizing this is a very long-term effort, the County will advocate for relaxation of the “statewideness” rule to allow individual counties or a consortium of counties to receive direct waivers from the federal government and/or adopt the rules and regulations currently in use in another state for specific programs. Habitat Conservation Planning – The County will advocate for elevating the profile of Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) such as the East Contra Costa County HCP within Congress and Administration so that these critical federal/state/local partnerships can receive necessary attention and support. HCPs are flagship programs for the federal government and supporting effective implementation of approved HCPs should be a top priority for the U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and HCPs should be a key tool in any federal climate change or economic stimulus legislation. Health – The County will advocate for the following actions by the federal government: a) provide enhanced Medicaid FMAP (the "Federal Medical Assistance Percentage" for Medicaid. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 347 14 It is the federal matching rate for state Medicaid expenditures.); b) suspend the Medicare “clawback” rule; c) suspend the “60-day rule” that requires states to repay the federal government overpayments identified by the state prior to collection, and even in instances where the state can never collect; d) ease the ability to cover those eligible for Medicaid by making documentation requirements less stringent; and e) prevent the implementation of the following seven federal regulations:  Outpatient hospital  Case Management  School Based Administration & Transportation  Public Provider Cost Limit  Graduate Medical Education  Rehabilitation Services Option  Provider Tax SUPPORT full funding of the Federal Medicaid program by the federal government. Medicaid provides access to health care for people whose income and resources are insufficient to pay for health care. It is jointly funded by Federal and State governments. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (also known as the ACA) significantly expanded both eligibility for and federal funding of Medicaid. OPPOSE amendments to the ACA that would reduce support for Medicaid/Medi-Cal payments to providers. Levee Restoration and Repair – The County will support legislation such as H.R. 6484, the SAFE Levee Act (Garamendi) in 2012, which will authorize the U.S. Department of the Interior to invest in Delta levee repairs, for all levees that are publicly owned or publicly maintained. The bill also requires a cost-benefit analysis for the tunnel project being planned as part of the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan. Pension – The County will support legislation that would modify the Internal Revenue Code and corresponding regulations to permit public employees to make an irrevocable election between their current pension formula and a less rich pension formula. In 2006, Contra Costa County and the Deputy Sheriff’s Association jointly obtained state legislation that would allow members of the Association to make a one-time irrevocable election between their current pension formula and a less rich pension formula, called Tier C. Orange County and its labor organizations obtained similar legislation in 2009. However, neither County has been able to implement this state legislation because such elections currently have negative tax consequences for employees and for retirement plans under federal tax law as interpreted by the Internal Revenue Service. Like many local government entities nationwide, the County’s fiscal position would benefit greatly from reduced pension costs. Allowing local government entities to implement collective bargaining agreements and state legislation that permits employees to elect less rich pension formulas would be a significant step in reducing pension costs. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 348 2016 Federal Legislative Platform Contra Costa County 15 Private Activity Bonds for Government Buildings – The County will support legislation that would create a new category of private activity bonds for governments to join with private parties to help finance government buildings. The tax-exempt bonding mechanism would allow state and local governments to issue private activity bonds to finance the construction and upkeep of certain publically owned buildings. The County will support amending the federal tax code to provide another layer of tax-exempt financing that would encourage the use of public- private partnerships. Public Housing Programs – The County will support legislation that results in the transformation of existing programs to improve their effectiveness and efficiency, in tandem with the design of new and innovative responses, both to build upon recent progress and address outstanding issues. The County will support legislation to protect the nation’s investment in Public Housing:  Enact affordable housing industry proposal to allow public housing agencies (PHAs) to voluntarily convert public housing units to Section 8 project-based rental assistance in order to preserve this vital component of the national infrastructure.  Oppose the Administration’s proposal to impose a $1 billion offset against the operating reserves of responsible, entrepreneurial PHAs.  Support the revitalization of severely distressed public housing units.  Address safety and security concerns connected to drug-related crime. The County will support legislation to preserve vital community and economic development programs:  Fully fund the Community Development Block Grant Program in order to create and save jobs, revitalize local economies, and support critical services for vulnerable populations.  Maintain funding for HUD’s cost-effective economic development tools. The County will support legislation to strengthen and simplify the Section 8 Rental Assistance programs:  Provide adequate funding for Housing Assistance Payment contract renewals and ongoing administrative fees.  Enact the Section Eight Voucher Reform Act (SEVRA).  Implement overdue regulatory and administrative revisions that ensure the efficient use of program funds. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 349 16 The County will support legislation to expand Affordable Housing Opportunities and combat homelessness:  Fully fund the Home Investment Partnerships Program and HUD’s homeless assistance programs.  Capitalize the Housing Trust Fund through a revenue-neutral approach.  Preserve and strengthen the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program. The County will support legislation to foster innovation, increase efficiency, and streamline the regulatory environment:  Promote reasonable and flexible federal oversight.  Incentivize green building and increased Energy Efficiency.  Support HUD’s ongoing transformation efforts.  Ensure that HUD releases and distributes federal funding in a timely manner.  Eliminate statutory and regulatory barriers that prevent PHAs and redevelopment authorities from accessing federal programs they are qualified to administer. Rail Safety – Contra Costa County is home to a substantial oil refinery industry with four refineries located in the County. The County supports Senator Heitkamp’s Railroad Emergency Services Preparedness, Operational Needs, and Safety Evaluation (RESPONSE) Act, S. 2547, which would establish a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) panel focused on railroad incident first responders. By bringing together under FEMA’s National Advisory Council all relevant agencies, emergency responders, technical experts, and the private sector for a review of training, resources, best practices, and unmet needs related to emergency responders to railroad hazmat incidents, the RESPONSE Act will begin the process of addressing shortcomings in existing emergency response practices and procedures. It will also address the effectiveness of funding levels related to training local emergency responders for rail hazardous materials incidents. The County also supports FEMA funding for the training of first responders, regulations that increase tank car safety standards for cars transporting crude oil and other hazardous materials, and regulations that require railroads to share data with state emergency managers and local responders. Retiree and Retiree Health Care Costs – The County operates many programs on behalf of the federal government. While federal funding is available for on-going program operations, including employee salaries, the allocation is usually capped, regardless of actual costs. For retiree and retiree health care, the County’s ability to contain costs is extremely limited. The County will advocate for full federal financial participation in funding the County’s retiree and retiree health obligations. State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) – On May 23, 2012, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a change in the State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP) that AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 350 2016 Federal Legislative Platform Contra Costa County 17 will prohibit SCAAP funds from being used to reimburse localities for foreign-born criminal aliens housed in jails that have been classified as “unknown inmates” by the Department of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency. This is a significant change to the SCAAP reimbursement formula and will heavily impact counties across the nation. The County will support the rescinding of this decision and a reinstatement of the previous reimbursement practice, which would more equitably reimburse jurisdictions for the costs of housing undocumented individuals, including those inmates whose status may be unknown to the Department of Homeland Security. Second Chance Act – The County will support funding for the Second Chance Act, which helps counties address the growing population of individuals returning from prisons and jails. Despite massive increases in corrections spending in states and jails nationwide, recidivism rates remain high: half of all individuals released from state prison are re-incarcerated within three years. Here in California, unfortunately, the recidivism rate is even higher. Yet there is reason for hope: research shows that when individuals returning from prison or jail have access to key treatments, education, and housing services, recidivism rates go down and the families and communities they return to are stronger and safer. The Second Chance Act ensures that the tax dollars on corrections are better spent, and provides a much-needed response to the "revolving door" of people entering and leaving prison and jail. SparkPoint, Service Integration – The County will support federal funding for the establishment and operation of SparkPoint and Service Integration models. SparkPoint Centers are one-stop, financial-education centers that help individuals and families who are struggling to make ends meet. SparkPoint helps clients address immediate financial crises, get them back on their feet, and build financial security. Each center brings together a full range of services at one convenient location, including job training, career development and financial coaching, as well as access to higher education and savings accounts. The Contra Costa County Service Integration Program co-locates county and non-profit agency service providers and community residents in neighborhood-based family service centers to provide accessible, coordinated public services tailored to meet the specific needs and goals of low-income families, while also engaging families in resident-driven efforts to revitalize their communities. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) – The County will advocate for the following federal actions:  Increase SNAP benefits as a major and immediately available element of economic stimulus.  Suspend the restrictions applying to ABAWDs. ("ABAWDs" stands for "Able-Bodied Adults without Dependents" and pertains to adults receiving food stamps who are considered employable.) They are subject to strict time limits on how long they can receive food stamps. It is difficult administratively to track this, and when unemployment is high, it can result in more adults going hungry. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 351 18  Remove the current federal barriers that prevent some nutrition programs from employing EBT technology. Streamlining Permitting for Critical Infrastructure, Economic Stimulus, and Alternative Energy Projects –“Green” Job Creation – Request that Congress and the Administration recognize the value of Habitat Conversation Plans (HCPs) as a reliable way of streamlining critical infrastructure, economic stimulus, and alternative energy project permitting in a manner that is consistent with federal environmental regulations. HCPs not only facilitate such projects through permit streamlining, but the planning, implementation, management, and monitoring needs associated with regional HCPs plans also create many quality “green” jobs. Telecommunications Act of 1996 Revisions – The Telecommunications Act of 1996 governs local government’s role in telecommunications, primarily broadband cable that uses the County’s right-of-way as well as consumer protections. As Congress works to update the Act, the County will continue to advocate for strengthening consumer protections and local government oversight of critical communications technologies; local access to affordable and reliable high speed broadband infrastructures to support the local economy; the right of local municipalities and communities to offer high-speed broadband access: coordination and integration of private communication resources for governmental emergency communication systems; preservation of local government’s franchise fees; preservation of the local community benefits, including but not limited to public, education and governmental (PEG) access channels; authority for provision of municipal telecommunication services; preservation of local police powers essential for health, safety and welfare of the citizenry; preservation of local government ownership and control of the local public rights-of-way; and support for ensuring that communication policy promotes affordable services for all Americans. The Community Broadband Act of 2007, S.1853, encourages the deployment of high speed networks by preserving the authority of local governments to offer community broadband infrastructure and services. The County will oppose all bills that do not address the County’s concerns unless appropriately amended. In addition, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed rule-making (FCC Second Report and Order Docket 05-311 “Franchising Rules for Incumbents”) that, in the opinion of local government, goes beyond the scope of their authority in this area. The County will oppose all such rule making efforts. Telecommunications Issues – Support the Community Access Preservation (CAP) Act introduced in 2009 by Wisconsin Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin. The CAP Act addresses the challenges faced by public, educational and government (PEG) TV channels and community access television stations. The CAP Act addresses four immediate issues facing PEG channels. The CAP Act would: Allow PEG fees to be used for any PEG-related purpose; require PEG channels to be carried in the same manner as local broadcast channels; require the FCC to study the effect state video franchise laws have had on PEG; require operators in states that adopted statewide franchising to provide support equal to the greater of the support required under the state law or the support historically provided for PEG; and make cable television-related laws and regulations applicable to all landline video providers. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 352 2016 Federal Legislative Platform Contra Costa County 19 In addition, the County should support the widespread deployment and adoption of broadband, especially as it serves to connect the educational community and libraries. Temporary Assistance for Needy Families – The County will advocate for the following federal actions:  Relieve states of work participation rate and work verification plan penalties for fiscal years 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 in recognition of the serious downturn in the national economy and the succession of more “process-based” regulations issued in the last few years.  Permanently withdraw the August 8, 2008, proposal that would have repealed the regulation that enables states to claim caseload reduction credit for excess MOE expenditures.  Rescind the May 22, 2008, HHS guidance that effectively eliminated the ability of states to offer pre-assistance programs to new TANF applicants for up to four months.  Rescind the final Deficit Reduction Act regulation restricting allowable state maintenance-of-effort expenditures under TANF purposes 3 and 4.  End federal efforts to impose a national TANF error rate. Veterans Benefits – The County will support legislation to increase availability, accessibility, and utilization of Veterans Benefits. Within Contra Costa County, Veterans’ health care is provided by the VA Martinez Clinic, a division of the VA Northern California Healthcare System. Currently, access to enrollment in the VA healthcare system is limited to Veterans with a Service Connected disability of greater than 10%, special eligibility criteria (Purple Heart, former POW, Iraq & Afghanistan Vets within 5 years of discharge, etc.), and to Veterans with an annual gross income less than a geographically based threshold. Currently, VA emergency services are not available after hours or during weekends. The nearest VA emergency room is nearly 34 miles away from the VA Martinez Clinic. The County will support legislation that would expand enrollment eligibility (such as removing the income limit criteria) to all Veterans with an honorable discharge. Furthermore, the County will support legislation that would establish 24 hour VA emergency services at the VA Martinez clinic. In addition, the County will support legislation that will improve the timeliness and quality of both VA benefits claim decisions and VA healthcare services. Specifically, legislation that works toward improving on the expedited processing of claims and administering of benefits to populations with unique needs, such as homeless Veterans, Women Veterans, and Veterans experiencing service related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 353 20 Veterans Halls – The County will support legislation to provide America’s veterans organizations with resources to make necessary repairs to or replacement of their meeting halls and facilities. Across America, the meeting halls and posts of Veterans Service Organizations such as the American Legion and Veterans of Foreign Wars serve as unofficial community centers. Unfortunately, many of these facilities are not compliant with Americans with Disabilities Act accessibility standards, are not earthquake retrofitted, or have deteriorated in recent years due to declining membership and reduced rental revenues as a result of the economic downturn. The County will support legislation that would create a competitive grant program for veterans’ organizations, classified by the IRS as 501c19 non-profit organizations and comprised primarily of past or present members of the United States Armed Forces and their family members, to use for repairs and improvements to their existing facilities. Volume Pricing – The National Association of Counties supports greater access for local governments to General Services Administration (GSA) contract schedules. These schedules provide volume pricing for state and local governments and make public sector procurement more cost effective. However, current law does not provide full access to state and local governments for GSA schedules. The County will support legislation that gives local governments access to these schedules and provides the option of purchasing law enforcement, security, and other related items at favorable GSA reduced pricing. Water Quality, Quantity and Delta Outflow – Congress may consider legislation that could adversely affect water quality, quantity and flows in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta to the detriment of the County residents, economy and resources. The Board of Supervisors will rely on its adopted Delta Water Platform and its adopted resolution on Water, Ecosystem Health and other Issues Related to the San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento –San Joaquin River Delta (No. 2012-46) to determine the appropriate response to federal legislative issues brought to the Board’s attention. Workforce Development – Contra Costa County supports policies that meet the needs of serving businesses, workers, job seekers, and youth. The County further supports policies under the Workforce Innovation & Opportunity Act (WIOA) that preserve local decision-making relative to spending, direction of work, and other functions of local workforce boards. The County also supports policies that increase employment and the creation of jobs in both the public and private sector and that enhance business’ access to a qualified talent pool, and promote business growth through the development of a skilled workforce. The County also favors policies that provide increased funding to support job seeker services, as well as policies that make strategic investments to leverage existing funding in the workforce development arena. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 354 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES355 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES356 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES357 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES358 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES359 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES360 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES361 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES362 RECOMMENDATION(S): CONSIDER adopting an Support position on Proposition 67: Referendum to Overturn Ban on Single-Use Plastic Bags, which would be a position in favor of upholding or ratifying SB 270, the contested legislation banning single-use plastic bags, as recommended by the Legislation Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: No direct impact to the County from adopting a position on the initiative. BACKGROUND: The California Plastic Bag Ban Referendum will be on the November 8, 2016, ballot in California as a veto referendum. Summary: A majority of “no” votes on the referendum would repeal SB 270 (Chapter 850, Statutes of 2014), which prohibited certain stores from distributing lightweight, single-use plastic bags. SB 270 established requirements for reusable bags and prohibited stores from distributing reusable bags and recycled paper bags for less than $0.10 per bag. A "yes" vote on Proposition 67 is a vote in favor of upholding or ratifying the contested legislation banning plastic bags . APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 26 To:Board of Supervisors From:LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Proposition 67 Referendum to Overturn Ban on Single-Use Plastic Bags AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 363 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Background Local ordinances In 2007, San Francisco became the first jurisdiction in California to ban single-use plastic bags. Since then, 108 ordinances banning single-use plastic bags have been approved in the state, covering 137 county or local jurisdictions. Los Angeles, the largest city in California and second largest in the United States, banned single-use plastic bags and placed a 10 cent charge on paper bags. The city's ordinance went into effect on January 1, 2014, for large businesses and on July 1, 2014, for small businesses. There were initiative attempts to overturn local single-use plastic bag bans in Walnut Creek, Huntington Creek and Campbell, California. All were unsuccessful in their signature drives. In January 2015, however, Huntington Beach's city council voted to repeal the city's bag ban. Councilman Mike Posey, who proposed the repeal, said repealing the ban was about "personal freedom and personal responsibility." On September 30, 2014, Senate Bill 270 was signed into law by Governor Brown. The law prohibits specified stores from providing a single-use carryout bag to a customer and requires such stores to meet other requirements regarding providing recycled paper bags and compostable bags. The law requires a bag fee and creates a related fund and requires bags sold or provided to a store by a reusable grocery bag producer to meet specified requirements. If the measure is approved by the state's voters, it would: Ratify Senate Bill 270 (2014). Prohibit large grocery stores and pharmacies from providing plastic single-use carryout bags and ban small grocery stores, convenience stores and liquor stores from doing so the following year. Allow single-use plastic bags for meat, bread, produce, bulk food and perishable items. Mandate stores to charge 10 cents for recycled, compostable and reusable grocery bags. Exempt consumers using a payment card or voucher issued by the California Special Supplemental Food Program from being charged for bags. Provide $2 million to state plastic bag manufacturers for the purpose of helping them retain jobs and transition to making thicker, multi-use, recycled plastic bags. Supporters of the plastic bag ban argue that the campaign fighting the ban is funded by out-of-state plastic companies who aren’t invested in protecting California’s environment. They say the ban will help protect the environment without hurting low-income consumers or decreasing job creation. Critics of California's plastic bag ban primarily argue that the ban infringes on the rights of certain groups, is illustrative of government waste, and is the product of unions and other special interests. Pollution. Although plastic represents a relatively small fraction of the overall waste stream in California, plastic waste is the predominate form of marine debris. Plastics are estimated to comprise 60% to 80% of all marine debris and 90% of all floating debris. According to the California Coastal Commission, the primary source of marine debris is urban runoff, of which lightweight plastic bags and plastic film are particularly susceptible. According to the Department of Resources, Recycling and Recovery (Cal Recycle), a large amount of this plastic is accumulating in waterways and landscapes around the world, including the Pacific Ocean’s Gyre (also known as the Great Pacific Garbage Patch). In addition, cities and counties are responsible for reducing storm water pollution to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) and eliminate discharge through a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). Part of this includes removing trash, including plastic from our storm drains and gutters. Storm water permits are costly and because of Proposition 218, local governments are unable to raise their fees without a vote of the people. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 364 Legislative Efforts. SB 270, by Senators Padilla, de León and Lara, was adopted by the Legislature and signed by the Governor in 2014. This bill established a statewide ban on the distribution of single-use plastic grocery bags at most stores. It was passed after several years of efforts, including numerous other legislative attempts and was ultimately supported by environmental groups, grocers, retailers, various local governments and labor. CSAC did not ultimately take a position on SB 270 due to amendments that directed the fee placed on reusable bags to remain with retail establishments rather than dedicated to environmental programs. CSAC did support previous bag ban bills, including AB 2829 (Davis, 2008), AB 68 (Brownley, 2009), AB 87 (Davis, 2009) & AB 158 (Levine, 2013-14). These previous legislative attempts to ban plastic bags would have dedicated proceeds from the sale of reusable bags for environmental mitigation purposes. SB 270 does preempt local governments from passing an ordinance that differs from the statewide ban, while grandfathering in existing ordinances passed prior to September 2014. There currently are over 140 local city and county ordinances banning single-use carry out bags in California. Proposition 26. In November 2010, California voters passed Proposition 26 (Prop 26). Prop 26 redefines regulatory fees as taxes. This means that new regulatory fees must now be treated like taxes and must be approved by a legislative supermajority (at the state level) and a voter supermajority for local measures. In response to Prop 26, local governments have begun to restructure their local bag ordinances by having the proceeds from the charge on paper or reusable bags go to the retailer instead of the government. CSAC supported previous legislative attempts to ban plastic bags before the issue of Prop 26 required either a supermajority vote or proceeds of sales to remain with the retailer. Specifically, SB 270 does the following: Prohibits stores from making single-use carryout bags available at the point of sale on the following timeline: On and after January 1, 2015, at either a grocery store or retailer with at least 10,000 square feet of retail space and a pharmacy. On and after July 1, 2016, at a convenience food store and food mart. Authorizes a store to make available a reusable grocery bag or recycled paper bag at the point of sale. Requires that these bags may not be sold to a consumer for less than $0.10. Requires that all monies collected by stores pursuant to this bill be retained at the store and be used for costs associated with complying with this bill; actual costs of providing recycled paper bags and reusable grocery bags; and costs associated with a store’s educational materials or educational campaign encouraging the use of reusable bags. Requires a store to provide a reusable bag or recycled paper bag at no charge to any customer using California Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants and Children benefits, CalFresh benefits (federally known as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program [SNAP] benefits), California Food Assistance Program benefits, or cash aid benefits. Authorizes a city, county, city and county, or the state to impose civil liability of $1,000 for the first violation of the proposed law, $2,000 for the second violation, and $5,000 for each subsequent violation. Collected penalties must be paid to whichever agency brought the action. Grandfathers in all local ordinances adopted before September 1, 2014, relating to reusable grocery bags, single-use carryout bags, or recycled paper bags. Preempts local ordinances adopted on or after September 1, 2014, relating to reusable grocery bags, single-use carryout bags, or recycled paper bags. Appropriated $2 million from the Recycled Market Development Revolving Loan Subaccount for loans for the creation and retention of jobs and economic activity in the state for the manufacture and recycling of plastic reusable grocery bags that use recycled content. Required recipients of a loan to retain and retrain existing employees for the manufacturing of reusable grocery bags that meet the requirements of this bill. SB 270 does grandfather in local ordinances prior to September 2014. While CSAC supported previous attempts to ban plastic bags, they do not have specific policy related to the AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 365 direction of the fee on reusable bags. Support . The following organizations are the main proponents of upholdingthe ban on plastic bags: California League of Conservation Voters (CLCV) Californians Against Waste (CAW) Environment California Heal the Bay Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) Sierra Club California Surfrider Foundation Opposition. The American Progressive Bag Alliance, an opponent of the measure, is leading the campaign to repeal SB 270. Other organizations in opposition include the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association and the California Manufacturer's and Technology Association. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: There would be no record of the County's position for the ballot initiative. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Proposition 67: Referendum of SB 270 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 366 1 4 - 0 0 1 1 September 30 ,2014 VIA PERSONAL DELIVERY The Honorable Kamala D. Harris. Attorney General 1300 I Street, 1th Floor, P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 95814 Attention: Ashley Johansson, Initiative Coordinator ~CEIVEO SEP 3 02014 INITIATIVE COORDINATOR ATTORNf:Y GENERAL'S OFFICE Re: Request for Title and Summary for Proposed Referendum Dear Ms. Harris: Pursuant to Article II, Section 1 O(d) of the California· Constitution, I hereby submit the attached proposed statewide referendum of all portions of Senate Bill 270 (2013­ 20 14 Regular Session of the California Legislature}, except for subdivision (a) of Section 42288 of the Public Resources Code, to your office and request that you · prepare a title and summary of the measure as provided by law. Included with this submission is the required proponent affidavit signed by the proponent of this measure pursuant to section 9608 of the California Elections Code. My address as a registered voter is attached to this letter, along with a check for $200.00. All inquires or correspondence relative to this initiative should be directed to Nielsen, Merksamer, Parrinello, Gross &Leoni, LLP, 1415 L Street, Suite 1200, Sacramento, CA 95814, (916) 446-6752, Attention: Kurt Oneto Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, ;V~;e~ Doyle L. Johnson, Proponent Enclosure: Proposed Refere'ndum Statute AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 367 14-0011 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE NOTICE: CHAPTER 850, STATUTES OF 2014 {58 270}, IS BEING SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL OR REJECTION BY THE VOTERS IN ITS ENTIRETY, EXCEPT FOR PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE§ 42288, SUBD. {a), AS INDICATED IN BOLD, ITALICIZED, 8-POINT TYPE BELOW CHAPTER _8_50__ An act to add Chapter 5.3 (commencing with Section 42280) to Part 3 of Division 30 of the Public Resources Code, relating to solid waste, and making an appropriation therefor. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST SB 270, Padilla. Solid waste: single-use carryout bags. (1) Existing law, until2020, requires an operator of a store, as defined, to establish an at-store recycling program that provides to customers the opportunity to return clean plastic carryout bags to that store. This bill, as of July 1, 2015, would prohibit stores that have a specified amount of sales in dollars or retail floor space from providing a single-use carryout bag to a customer, with specified exceptions. The bill would also prohibit those stores from selling or distributing a recycled paper bag at the point of sale unless the store makes that bag available for purchase for not less than $0.1 0. The bill would also allow those stores, on or after July 1, 2015, to distribute compostable bags at the point of sale only in jurisdictions that meet specified requirements and at a cost of not less than $0.10. The bill would require these stores to meet other specified requirements on and after July 1, 2015, regarding providing reusable grocery bags to customers, including distributing those bags only at a cost of not less than $0.1 0. The bill would require all moneys collected pursuant to these provisions to be retained by the store and be used only for specified purposes. The bill, on and after July 1, 2016, would additionally impose these prohibitions and requirements on convenience food stores, foodmarts, and entities engaged in the sale of a limited line of goods, or goods intended to be consumed off premises, and that hold a specified license with regard to alcoholic beverages. The bill would allow a retail establishment to voluntarily comply with these requirements, if the retail establishment provides the department with irrevocable written notice. The bill would require the department to post on its Internet Web site, organized by county, the name and physical location of each retail establishment that has elected to comply with these requirements. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 368 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE The bill would require the operator ofa store that has a specified amount of sales in dollars or retail floor space and a retail establishment that voluntarily complies with the requirements of this bill to comply with the existing at-store recycling program requirements. The bill would require, on and after July 1, 2015, a reusable grocery bag sold by certain stores to a customer at the point of sale to be made by a certified reusable grocery bag producer and to meet specified requirements with regard to the bag's durability, material, labeling, heavy metal content, and, with regard to reusable grocery bags made from plastic film on and after January 1, 2016, recycled material content. The bill would impose these requirements as of July 1, 2016, on the stores that are otherwise subject to the bill's requirements. The bill would prohibit a producer of reusable grocery bags made from plastic film from selling or distributing those bags on and after July 1, 2015, unless the producer is certified by a 3rd-party certification entity, as specified. The bill would require a reusable grocery bag producer to provide proof of certification to the department. The bill would require the department to provide a system to receive proofs of certification online. The department would be required to publish on its Internet Web site a list of reusable grocery bag producers that have submitted the required certification and their reusable grocery bags. The bill would require the department to establish an administrative certification fee schedule, which would require a reusable grocery bag producer providing proof to the department of certification or recertification to pay a fee. The bill would require that all moneys submitted to the department pursuant to these fee provisions be deposited into the Reusable Grocery Bag Fund, which would be established by the bill, and continuously appropriated for purposes of implementing these proof of certification and Internet Web site provisions, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would also require a reusable grocery bag producer to submit applicable certified test results to the department. The bill would authorize a person to object to a certification of a reusable grocery bag producer by filing an action for review of that certification in the superior court of a county that has jurisdiction over the reusable grocery bag producer. The bill would require the court to determine if the reusable grocery bag producer is in compliance with the AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 369 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE provisions of the bill and, based on the court's determination, would require the court to direct the department to either remove or retain the reusable grocery bag producer on its published Internet Web site list. The bill would allow a city, county, or city and county, or the state to impose civil penalties on a person or entity that lrn.ows or reasonably should have known it is in violation of the bill's requirements. The bill would require these civil penalties to be paid to the office of the city attorney, city prosecutor, district attorney, or Attorney General, whichever office brought the action, and would allow the penalties collected by the Attorney General to be expended by the Attorney General, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to enforce the bill's provisions. The bill would declare that it occupies the whole field of the regulation of reusable grocery bags, single-use carryout bags, and recycled paper bags provided by a store and would prohibit a local public agency from enforcing or implementing an ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule, or any amendment thereto, adopted on or after September 1, 2014, relating to those bags, against a store, except as provided. (2) The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 creates the Recycling Market Development Revolving Loan Subaccount in the Integrated Waste Management Account and continuously appropriates the funds deposited in the subaccount to the department for making loans for the purposes of the Recycling Market Development Revolving Loan Program. Existing law makes the provisions regarding the loan program, the creation of the subaccount, and expenditures from the subaccount inoperative on July 1, 2021, and repeals them as of January 1, 2022. This bill would appropriate $2,000,000 from the Recycling Market Development Revolving Loan Subaccount in the Integrated Waste Management Account to the department for the purposes of providing loans for the creation and retention of jobs and economic activity in California for the manufacture and recycling ofplastic reusable grocery bags that use recycled content. The bill would require a recipient of a loan to agree, as a condition of receiving the loan, to take specified actions. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 370 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE (3) The bill would require the department, no later than March 1, 2018, to provide a status report to the Legislature on the implementation of the bill's provisions. Appropriation: yes. The people ofthe State ofCalifornia do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Chapter 5.3 (commencing with Section 42280) is added to Part 3 of Division 30 of the Public Resources Code, to read: CHAPTER 5.3. SINGLE-USE CARRYOUT BAGS Article 1. Definitions 42280. (a) "Department" means the Department ofResources Recycling and Recovery. (b) "Postconsumer recycled material" means a material that would otherwise be destined for solid waste disposal, having completed its intended end use and product life cycle. Postconsumer recycled material does not include materials and byproducts generated from, and commonly reused within, an original manufacturing and fabrication process. (c) "Recycled paper bag" means a paper carryout bag provided by a store to a customer at the point of sale that meets all of the following requirements: (1) (A) Except as provided in subparagraph (B), contains a minimum of 40 percent postconsumer recycled materials. (B) An eight pound or smaller recycled paper bag shall contain a minimum of 20 percent postconsumer recycled material. (2) Is accepted for recycling in curbside programs in a majority of households that have access to curbside recycling programs in the state. (3) Has printed on the bag the name of the manufacturer, the country where the bag was manufactured, and the minimum percentage of postconsumer content. (d) "Reusable grocery bag" means a bag that is provided by a store to a customer at the point of sale that meets the requirements of Section 42281. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 371 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE (e) (1) "Reusable grocery bag producer" means a person or entity that does any of the following: (A) Manufactures reusable grocery bags for sale or distribution to a store. (B) Imports reusable grocery bags into this state, for sale or distribution to a store. (C) Sells or distributes reusable bags to a store. (2) "Reusable grocery bag producer" does not include a store, with regard to a reusable grocery bag for which there is a manufacturer or importer, as specified in subparagraph (A) or (B) of paragraph (1). (f) (1) "Single-use carryout bag" means a bag made of plastic, paper, or other material that is provided by a store to a customer at the point of sale and that is not a recycled paper bag or a reusable grocery bag that meets the requirements of Section 42281. (2) A single-use carryout bag does not include either of the following: (A) A bag provided by a pharmacy pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code to a customer purchasing a prescription medication. (B) A nonhandled bag used to protect a purchased item from damaging or contaminating other purchased items when placed in a recycled paper bag, a reusable grocery bag, or a compostable plastic bag. (C) A bag provided to contain an unwrapped food item. (D) A nonhandled bag that is designed to be placed over articles of clothing on a hanger. (g) "Store" means a retail establishment that meets any of the following requirements: (1) A full-line, self-service retail store with gross annual sales oftwo million dollars ($2,000,000) or more that sells a line of dry groceries, canned goods, or nonfood items, and some perishable items. (2) Has at least 10,000 square feet ofretail space that generates sales or use tax pursuant to the Bradley-Bums Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law (Part 1.5 (commencing with Section 7200) of Division 2 ofthe Revenue and Taxation Code) and has a pharmacy licensed pursuant to Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 2 of the Business and Professions Code. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 372 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE (3) Is a convenience food store, foodmart, or other entity that is engaged in the retail sale of a limited line of goods, generally including milk, bread, soda, and snack foods, and that holds a Type 20 or Type 21 license issued by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. (4) Is a convenience food store, foodmart, or other entity that is engaged in the retail sale of goods intended to be consumed off the premises, and that holds a Type 20 or Type 21license issued by the Department ofAlcoholic Beverage Control. (5) Is not otherwise subject to paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4), if the retail establishment voluntarily agrees to comply with the requirements imposed upon a store pursuant to this chapter, irrevocably notifies the department ofits intent to comply with the requirements imposed upon a store pursuant to this chapter, and complies with the requirements established pursuant to Section 42284. Article 2. Reusable Grocery Bags 42281. (a) On and after July 1, 2015, a store, as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, may sell or distribute a reusable grocery bag to a customer at the point of sale only if the reusable bag is made by a producer certified pursuant to this article to meet all of the following requirements: (1) Has a handle and is designed for at least 125 uses, as provided in this article. (2) Has a volume capacity of at least 15 liters. (3) Is machine washable or made from a material that can be cleaned and disinfected. (4) Has printed on the bag, or on a tag attached to the bag that is not intended to be removed, and in a manner visible to the consumer, all of the following information: (A) The name of the manufacturer. (B) The country where the bag was manufactured. (C) A statement that the bag is a reusable bag and designed for at least 125 uses. (D) If the bag is eligible for recycling in the state, instructions to return the bag to the store for recycling or to another appropriate recycling location. If recyclable in the state, the bag shall include the chasing arrows recycling symbol or the term "recyclable," AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 373 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE consistent with the Federal Trade Commission guidelines use of that term, as updated. (5) Does not contain lead, cadmium, or any other toxic material that may pose a threat to public health. A reusable bag manufacturer may demonstrate compliance with this requirement by obtaining a no objection letter from the federal Food and Drug Administration. This requirement shall not affect any authority of the Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to Article 14 (commencing with Section 25251) of Chapter 6.5 of Division 20 ofthe Health and Safety Code and, notwithstanding subdivision (c) of Section 25257.1 ofthe Health and Safety Code, the reusable grocery bag shall not be considered as a product category already regulated or subject to regulation. (6) Complies with Section 260.12 of Part 260 ofTitle 16 of the Code of Federal Regulations related to recyclable claims if the reusable grocery bag producer makes a claim that the reusable grocery bag is recyclable. (b) (1) In addition to the requirements in subdivision (a), a reusable grocery bag made from plastic film shall meet all of the following requirements: (A) On and after January 1, 2016, it shall be made from a minimum of 20 percent postconsumer recycled material. (B) On and after January 1, 2020, it shall be made from a minimum of 40 percent postconsumer recycled material. (C) It shall be recyclable in this state, and accepted for return at stores subject to the at-store recycling program (Chapter 5.1 (commencing with Section 42250)) for recycling. (D) It shall have, in addition to the information required to be printed on the bag or on a tag, pursuant to paragraph ( 4) of subdivision (a), a statement that the bag is made partly or wholly from postconsumer recycled material and stating the postconsumer recycled material content percentage, as applicable. (E) It shall be capable of carrying 22 pounds over a distance of 175 feet for a minimum of 125 uses and be at least 2.25 mils thick, measured according to the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard D6988-13. (2) A reusable grocery bag made from plastic film that meets the specifications ofthe American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) International Standard Specification for Compostable Plastics D6400, as updated, is not required to meet the requirements AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 374 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE of subparagraph (A) or (B) ofparagraph (1), but shall be labeled in accordance with the applicable state law regarding compostable plastics. (c) In addition to the requirements ofsubdivision (a), a reusable grocery bag that is not made of plastic film and that is made from any other natural or synthetic fabric, including, but not limited to, woven or nonwoven nylon, polypropylene, polyethylene-terephthalate, or Tyvek, shall satisfy all of the following: (1) It shall be sewn. (2) It shall be capable of carrying 22 pounds over a distance of 175 feet for a minimum of 125 uses. (3) It shall have a minimum fabric weight of at least 80 grams per square meter. (d) On and after July 1, 2016, a store as defined in paragraph (3), (4), or (5) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, shall comply with the requirements of this section. 42281.5. On and after July 1, 2015, a producer of reusable grocery bags made from plastic film shall not sell or distribute a reusable grocery bag in this state unless the producer is certified by a third-party certification entity pursuant to Section 42282. A producer shall provide proof of certification to the department demonstrating that the reusable grocery bags produced by the producer comply with the provisions of this article. The proof of certification shall include all of the following: (a) Names, locations, and contact information of all sources of postconsumer recycled material and suppliers of postconsumer recycled material. (b) Quantity and dates of postconsumer recycled material purchases by the reusable grocery bag producer. (c) How the postconsumer recycled material is obtained. (d) Information demonstrating that the postconsumer recycled material is cleaned using appropriate washing equipment. 42282. (a) Commencing on or before July 1, 2015, the department shall accept from a reusable grocery bag producer proof ofcertification conducted by a third-party certification entity, submitted under penalty of peijury, for each type of reusable grocery bag that is manufactured, imported, sold, or distributed in the state and provided to a store for sale or distribution, at the point of sale, that meets all the applicable requirements of this article. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 375 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE The proof of certification shall be accompanied by a certification fee, established pursuant to Section 42282.1. (b) A reusable grocery bag producer shall resubmit to the department proof of certification as described in subdivision (a) on a biennial basis. A reusable grocery bag producer shall provide the department with an updated proof of certification conducted by a third-party certification entity if any modification that is not solely aesthetic is made to a previously certified reusable bag. Failure to comply with this subdivision shall result in removal of the relevant information posted on the department's Internet Web site pursuant to paragraphs (1) and (2) of subdivision (e) for each reusable bag that lacks an updated proof ofcertification conducted by a third-party certification entity. (c) A third-party certification entity shall be an independent, accredited (ISO/IEC 17025) laboratory. A third-party certification entity shall certify that the producer's reusable grocery bags meet the requirements of Section 44281. (d) The department shall provide a system to receive proofs of certification online. (e) On and after July 1, 2015, the department shall publish a list on its Internet Web site that includes all of the following: (1) The name, location, and appropriate contact information of certified reusable grocery bag producers. (2) The reusable grocery bags of producers that have provided the required certification. (f) A reusable grocery bag producer shall submit applicable certified test results to the department confirming that the reusable grocery bag meets the requirements ofthis article for each type of reusable grocery bag that is manufactured, imported, sold, or distributed in the state and provided to a store for sale or distribution. (1) A person may object to the certification ofa reusable grocery bag producer pursuant to this section by filing an action for review of that certification in the superior court of a county that has jurisdiction over the reusable grocery bag producer. The court shall determine if the reusable grocery bag producer is in compliance with the requirements ofthis article. (2) A reusable grocery bag producer whose certification is being objected to pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be deemed in compliance with this article pending a determination by the court. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 376 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE (3) Based on its determination, the court shall direct the department to remove the reusable grocery bag producer from, or retain the reusable grocery bag producer on, its list published pursuant to subdivision (e). (4) If the court directs the department to remove a reusable grocery bag producer from its published list, the reusable grocery bag producer shall remain off of the published list for a period of one year from the date of the court's determination. 42282.1. (a) A reusable grocery bag producer shall submit the fee established pursuant to subdivision (b) to the department when providing proof of certification or recertification pursuant to Sections 42281.5 and 42282. (b) The department shall establish an administrative certification fee schedule that will generate fee revenues sufficient to cover, but not exceed, the department's reasonable costs to implement this article. The department shall deposit all moneys submitted pursuant to this section into the Reusable Grocery Bag Fund, which is hereby established in the State Treasury. Notwithstanding Section 11340 of the Government Code, moneys in the fund are continuously appropriated, without regard to fiscal year, to the department for the purpose of implementing this article. Article 3. Single-Use Carryout Bags 42283. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (e), on and after July 1, 2015, a store, as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, shall not provide a single-use carryout bag to a customer at the point of sale. (b) (1) On and after July 1, 2015, a store, as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, shall not sell or distribute a reusable grocery bag at the point of sale except as provided in this subdivision. (2) On and after July 1, 2015, a store, as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, may make available for purchase at the point of sale a reusable grocery bag that meets the requirements of Section 42281. (3) On and after July 1, 2015, a store, as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, that makes reusable grocery bags available for purchase pursuant to paragraph (2) shall not sell the reusable grocery bag for less than ten cents ($0.1 0) in AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 377 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE order to ensure that the cost of providing a reusable grocery bag is not subsidized by a customer who does not require that bag. (c) (1) On and after July 1, 2015, a store, as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, shall not sell or distribute a recycled paper bag except as provided in this subdivision. (2) A store, as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, may make available for purchase a recycled paper bag. On and after July 1, 2015, the store shall not sell a recycled paper bag for less than ten cents ($0.1 0) in order to ensure that the cost of providing a recycled paper bag is not subsidized by a consumer who does not require that bag. (d) Notwithstanding any other law, on and after July 1, 2015, a store, as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, that makes reusable grocery bags or recycled paper bags available for purchase at the point of sale shall provide a reusable grocery bag or a recycled paper bag at no cost at the point of sale to a customer using a payment card or voucher issued by the California Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and Children pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 123275) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 106 of the Health and Safety Code or an electronic benefit transfer card issued pursuant to Section 10072 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. (e) On and after July 1, 2015, a store, as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, may distribute a compostable bag at the point of sale, if the compostable bag is provided to the consumer at the cost specified pursuant to paragraph (2), the compostable bag, at a minimum, meets the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International Standard Specification for Compostable Plastics D6400, as updated, and in the jurisdiction where the compostable bag is sold and in the jurisdiction where the store is located, both of the following requirements are met: (1) A majority of the residential households in the jurisdiction have access to curbside collection of foodwaste for com posting. (2) The governing authority for the jurisdiction has voted to allow stores in the jurisdiction to sell to consumers at the point of sale a compostable bag at a cost not less than the actual cost of the bag, which the Legislature hereby finds to be not less than ten cents ($0.1 0) per bag. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 378 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE (f) A store, as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, shall not require a customer to use, purchase, or accept a single-use carryout bag, recycled paper bag, compostable bag, or reusable grocery bag as a condition of sale of any product. 42283.5. On and after July 1, 2016, a store, as defined in paragraph (3), ( 4), or (5) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, shall comply with the same requirements of Section 42283 that are imposed upon a store, as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280. 42283.6. (a) The operator of a store, as defined in paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (g) of Section 42280 that makes recycled paper or reusable grocery bags available at the point of sale, shall be subject to the provisions of the at-store recycling program (Chapter 5.1 (commencing with Section 42250)). (b) A store that voluntarily agrees to comply with the provisions of this article pursuant to subdivision (g) of Section 42280, shall also comply with the provisions of the at-store recycling program (Chapter 5.1 (commencing with Section 42250)). 42283.7. All moneys collected pursuant to this article shall be retained by the store and may be used only for the following purposes: (a) Costs associated with complying with the requirements of this article. (b) Actual costs of providing recycled paper bags or reusable grocery bags. (c) Costs associated with a store's educational materials or educational campaign encouraging the use of reusable grocery bags. 42284. (a) A retail establishment not specifically required to comply with the requirements of this chapter is encouraged to reduce its distribution of single-use plastic carryout bags. (b) Pursuant to the provisions of subdivision (g) of Section 42280, any retail establishment that is not a "store," that provides the department with the irrevocable written notice as specified in subdivision (c), shall be regulated as a "store" for the purposes of this chapter. (c) The irrevocable written notice shall be dated and signed by an authorized representative of the retail establishment, and shall include the name and physical address ofall retail locations covered AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 379 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE by the notice. The department shall acknowledge receipt of the notice in writing and shall specify the date the retail establishment will be regulated as a "store," which shall not be less than 30 days after the date ofthe department's acknowledgment. The department shall post on its Internet Web site, organized by county, the name and physical location or locations of each retail establishment that has elected to be regulated as a "store." Article 4. Enforcement 42285. (a) A city, a county, a city and county, or the state may impose civil liability on a person or entity that knowingly violated this chapter, or reasonably should have known that it violated this chapter, in the amount of one thousand dollars ($1,000) per day for the first violation ofthis chapter, two thousand dollars ($2,000) per day for the second violation, and five thousand dollars ($5,000) per day for the third and subsequent violations. (b) Any civil penalties collected pursuant to subdivision (a) shall be paid to the office of the city attorney, city prosecutor, district attorney, or Attorney General, whichever office brought the action. The penalties collected pursuant to this section by the Attorney General may be expended by the Attorney General, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to enforce this chapter. Article 5. Preemption 42287. (a) Except as provided in subdivision (c), this chapter is a matter of statewide interest and concern and is applicable uniformly throughout the state. Accordingly, this chapter occupies the whole field of regulation of reusable grocery bags, single-use carry out bags, and recycled paper bags, as defined in this chapter, provided by a store, as defined in this chapter. (b) On and after January 1, 2015, a city, county, or other local public agency shall not enforce, or otherwise implement, an ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule, or any amendment thereto, adopted on or after September 1, 2014, relating to reusable grocery bags, single-use carryout bags, or recycled paper bags, against a store, as defined in this chapter, unless expressly authorized by this chapter. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 380 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE (c) (1) A city, county, or other local public agency that has adopted, before September 1, 2014, an ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule relating to reusable grocery bags, single-use carry out bags, or recycled paper bags may continue to enforce and implement that ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule that was in effect before that date. Any amendments to that ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule on or after January 1, 2015, shall be subject to subdivision (b), except the city, county, or other local public agency may adopt or amend an ordinance, resolution, regulation, or rule to increase the amount that a store shall charge with regard to a recycled paper bag, compostable bag, or reusable grocery bag to no less than the amount specified in Section 42283. (2) A city, county, or other local public agency not covered by paragraph (1) that, before September 1, 2014, has passed a first reading of an ordinance or resolution expressing the intent to restrict single-use carryoutbags and, before January 1, 2015, adopts an ordinance to restrict single-use carryout bags, may continue to enforce and implement the ordinance that was in effect before January 1, 2015. Article 6. Financial Provisions 42288. (a) Notwithstanding Section 42023.2, the sum oftwo million dollars ($2,000,000) is hereby appropriated from the Recycling Market Development Revolving Loan Subaccount in the Integrated Waste Management Account to the department for the purposes ofproviding loans for the creation and retention ofjobs and economic activity in this state for the manufacture and recycling ofplastic reusable grocery bags that use recycled content, including postconsumer recycled material. NOT SUBJECT TO REFERENDUM (b) The department may expend, ifthere are applicants eligible for funding from the Recycling Market Development Revolving Loan Subaccount, the funds appropriated pursuant to this section to provide loans for both of the following: (1) Development and conversion ofmachinery and facilities for the manufacture of single-use plastic bags into machinery and facilities for the manufacturer of durable reusable grocery bags that, at a minimum, meet the requirements of Section 42281. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 381 REFERENDUM AGAINST AN ACT PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE (2) Development of equipment for the manufacture of reusable grocery bags, that, at a minimum, meet the requirements of Section 42281. (c) A recipient of a loan authorized by this section shall agree, as a condition of receiving the loan, to retain and retrain existing employees for the manufacturing of reusable grocery bags that, at a minimum, meet the requirements of Section 42281. (d) Any moneys appropriated pursuant to this section not expended by the end ofthe 2015-16 fiscal year shall revert to the Recycling Market Development Revolving Loan Subaccount for expenditure pursuant to Article 3 (commencing with Section 42010) of Chapter 1. (e) Applicants for funding under this section may also apply for funding or benefits from other economic development programs for which they may be eligible, including, but not limited to, both of the following: (1) An income tax credit, as described in Sections 17059.2 and 23689 of the Revenue and Taxation Code. (2) A tax exemption pursuant to Section 6377.1 ofthe Revenue and Taxation Code. SEC. 2. No later than March 1, 2018, the department, as a part ofits reporting requirement pursuant to Section 40507 ofthe Public Resources Code, shall provide a status report on the implementation of Chapter 5.3 (commencing with Section 42280) of Part 3 of Division 30 of the Public Resources Code. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 382 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT a "Support" position on AB 2121 (Gonzalez) Alcoholic Beverage Control: Beverage Service Training, a bill that requires a person who sells or serves alcoholic beverages to complete an approved Responsible Interventions for Beverage Servers Training Course within 3 months of employment and every 3 years thereafter, as recommended by the Legislation Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact. BACKGROUND: At its July 11, 2016 meeting, the Legislation Committee considered the recommendation from the Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board to recommend a position of "Support" to the Board of Supervisors on AB 2121. The Committee voted unanimously to support the recommendation. Status: 06/28/2016 From SENATE Committee on GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION: Do pass to Committee on APPROPRIATIONS. (13-0) Bill Analysis - 06/27/2016 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 23 To:Board of Supervisors From:LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Support position on AB 2121 (Gonzalez) Alcoholic Beverage Control: Beverage Service Training AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 383 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) DIGEST: This bill establishes the Responsible Beverage Service (RBS) Training Program Act of 2016, beginning July 1, 2020, that requires an alcohol server, as defined, to successfully complete an RBS training course from an accredited training provider within three months of employment and every three years thereafter. ANALYSIS: Existing law: 1) Establishes the Department of ABC and grants it exclusive authority to administer the provisions of the ABC Act in accordance with laws enacted by the Legislature. This involves licensing individuals and businesses associated with the manufacture, importation and sale of alcoholic beverages in this state and the collection of license fees for this purpose. 2) Stipulates that no person who sells, furnishes, gives, or causes to be sold, furnished, or given away, any alcoholic beverage shall be civilly liable to any injured person or the estate of such person for injuries inflicted on that person as a result of intoxication by the consumer of such alcoholic beverage. 3) Provides that every person who sells, furnishes, gives, or causes to be sold, furnished, or given away, any alcoholic beverage to any habitual or common drunkard or to any obviously intoxicated person is guilty of a misdemeanor. 4) States a cause of action may be brought by or on behalf of any person who has suffered injury or death against any person licensed, or required to be licensed, as specified, or any person authorized by the federal government to sell alcoholic beverages on a military base or other federal enclave, who sells, furnishes, gives or causes to be sold, furnished or given away any alcoholic beverage, and any other person who sells, or causes to be sold, any alcoholic beverage, to any obviously intoxicated minor where the furnishing, sale or giving of that beverage to the minor is the proximate cause of the personal injury or death sustained by that person. 5) Defines an "on-sale" license as authorizing the sale of all types of alcoholic beverages: namely, beer, wine and distilled spirits, for consumption on the premises (such as at a restaurant or bar). An "off-sale" license authorizes the sale of all types of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises in original, sealed containers. 6) Permits the Department of ABC to issue licenses and authorizations for the retail sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits on a temporary basis for special events. The most common are as follows: a) Special Daily Beer and/or Wine License - Authorizes the sale of beer and/or wine for consumption on the premises where sold. (No off-sale privileges) b) Daily On-Sale General License - Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption on the premises where sold. (No off-sale privileges) c) Catering Authorization - Authorizes certain types of licensees (and catering businesses that qualify) to sell beer, wine and distilled spirits for consumption at conventions, sporting events, trade exhibits, picnics, social gatherings, or similar events. d) Event Authorization - Authorizes certain types of licensees to sell beer, wine and spirits for consumption on property adjacent to the licensed premises and owned or under the AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 384 control of the licensee. e) Wine Sales Event Permit - Authorizes wineries to sell bottled wine produced by the winegrower for consumption off the premises where sold and only at fairs, festivals or cultural events sponsored by designated nonprofit organizations. This bill: 1) Establishes the Responsible Beverage Service (RBS) Training Program and beginning July 1, 2020, requires alcohol servers, as defined, to complete an RBS training course from an accredited training provider within three months of employment and every three years thereafter. 2) Defines "alcohol server" to mean a person who sells or serves alcoholic beverages directly to consumers, or a person who manages or supervises a person who sells or serves alcoholic beverages directly to consumers, including the onsite establishment owner of a licensed facility, for consumption on the premises of a licensed facility that includes, but is not limited to, one-day events, fairs, festivals, sporting events, and other special events. 3) Stipulates that the licensee must ensure that those persons required to successfully complete an RBS training course do so and that a current certificate or card provided by any accredited training provider shall be sufficient documentation of successful completion and be accepted statewide. 4) Defines "accredited training provider" to mean either of the following: (a) A training provider accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) that meets ASTM International E2659-15 Standard Practice for Certificate Programs or (b) A training provider accredited by an accreditation agency other than ANSI, provided the accreditation agency is authorized by the department of ABC to accredit training providers offering RBS training courses. 5) Provides that a nonprofit organization that has obtained a temporary daily on-sale license or temporary daily off-sale license from the Department of ABC must designate a person or persons to receive RBS training before the event and that designated person or those designated persons must remain on site for the duration of the event. 6) Requires the Department of ABC, on or before January 1, 2020, to establish a list, published on its Internet Web site, of RBS training courses offered by accredited training providers that may be used to fulfill the requirements of this program. 7) Provides that an RBS training course shall consist of at least four hours of instruction and include certain information (e.g., social impact of alcohol; impact of alcohol on the body; state laws and regulations relating to alcoholic beverage control and driving under the influence; and, intervention techniques). Also, permits the Department of ABC to establish additional training standards and curricula to be included in an RBS training course. 8) Allows RBS training courses to be offered through a trainer-led class and assessment or self-training and assessment and specifies that participants must score 70% to successfully complete the course. Also, provides that the certificate or card shall be valid for three years from the date of issuance, regardless of whether the alcohol server changes employers during that period. 9) Provides that at least one RBS training course shall cost a participant no more than AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 385 $15, inclusive of the certificate or card provided upon successful completion of the training course. At least one RBS training course must be offered in Spanish. If no RBS training courses meet these requirements the RBS course requirements shall not apply. 10) Permits the Department of ABC to authorize an accreditation agency, in addition to ANSI, to accredit training providers to offer RBS training courses and to collect fees to cover reasonable costs associated with the review and approval of that accreditation agency. 11) Requires the Department of ABC, beginning January 1, 2019, to include information on the RBS training course requirement, including information on documentation requirements, on license applications and license renewal notices. Also, requires all licensees, beginning July 1, 2020, to maintain and provide upon request all records necessary to establish compliance with this bill. 12) Stipulates that, beginning July 1, 2020, an authorized licensee, or agent or employee of that licensee, who knowingly and intentionally employs an alcohol server that has not completed an RBS training course, shall only be subject to certain ABC Act civil and administrative penalties. Background Dram Shop Law. A dram shop law is a type of statute which holds any business establishment strictly liable for selling alcoholic beverages to a person who is obviously intoxicated. The purpose of dram shop laws is to increase the responsibility of those who make profits by tendering alcoholic beverages to guests. The word "dram" refers to a British unit of measurement for serving alcohol. Dram shop laws usually deal with prohibiting alcohol sales to intoxicated persons, but sometimes they may also cover the sale of alcohol to minors, as well as issues with licenses and identification. Most states have some form of these types of laws, but they vary widely between jurisdictions. California's Dram Shop Law specifies that a vendor who provides alcohol to a person 21 years of age or older cannot be held liable for damages if the person then injures someone else, even if the person was obviously intoxicated at the time. The law states that the consumption of alcohol, not the furnishing of the beverages, is the proximate cause of injuries that an intoxicated person inflicts on another individual, a position that largely eliminates dram shop liability. Thus, the sale of alcohol by bars, liquor stores and restaurants in California is not considered to be the cause of an automobile accident. RBS training programs. RBS training is not mandatory in California although some cities and counties do require RBS training in order to sell or serve alcoholic beverages at licensed establishments within their jurisdictions. Currently, the Department of ABC oversees the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program (LEAD) - a free, voluntary prevention and education program for retail licensees, their employees and applicants. The mission of the LEAD program is to provide high quality, effective and educationally sound training on alcohol responsibility and the law to California retail licensees and their employees. The program was initiated in 1991 with a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety. The training classes are offered at a variety of locations throughout the state and include instruction on checking various forms of identification, detecting and preventing illegal activity, reducing liability and much more. Each training class lasts four hours. At the conclusion of the class, there is an exam on the material that was covered and each person that fulfills all of the training requirements receives a certificate, via email, certifying that they successfully completed a LEAD training course. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 386 Purpose of AB 2121. This bill will establish an RBS training program that will require alcohol servers, beginning July 1, 2020, to obtain certification that they have successfully completed an RBS training course from an accredited training provider within three months of employment and every three years thereafter. The Department of ABC will be required to develop a list, published on its Web site, of accredited RBS training courses. Also, both new and renewal applicants for on-sale licenses will be required to provide ABC with documentation that its employees have successfully completed an RBS accredited training course. Additionally, this bill requires nonprofit organizations that have obtained temporary daily off-sale or on-sale licenses to designate at least one person to receive RBS training prior to the event and that person must stay on site for the duration of the event. Furthermore, this bill provides that a licensee, or agent or employee of that licensee, who knowingly and intentionally employs an alcohol server that has not completed an RBS training course, shall only be subject to civil and administrative penalties. According to the author's office, "The "National Highway Traffic Safety Administration claims that more than 10,000 people die on our streets every year - the equivalent of one fatality every 51 minutes due to drunk driving. While we can't entirely stop every individual from making bad decisions that put innocent people at risk, we do have a responsibility to intervene when we can. Unlike 18 other states and the District of Columbia, California does not require responsible beverage server training for those bartenders and restaurant servers who are serving alcohol to customers and are in a unique position to assess and intervene if customers pose a potential threat. While law enforcement does its best with checkpoints and other enforcement, these approaches only help after someone has already made the choice to get behind the wheel when they shouldn't. That isn't good enough. This bill seeks to help individuals who serve alcohol meet their statutory requirement not to serve obviously intoxicated patrons and minors by requiring participation in an RBS training course from an accredited training provider within three months of employment and every three years thereafter. The ancillary benefit is a reduction in drunk driving." SUPPORT: Alcohol Justice California Alcohol Policy Alliance California Craft Brewers Association California Medical Association (sponsor) California Police Chiefs Association California Society of Addiction Medicine County Health Executives Association of California Los Angeles Drug and Alcohol Policy Alliance Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) Partnership for a Positive Pomona AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 387 SPIRITT Family Services OPPOSITION: None received ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: Proponents state that "this legislation establishes a reasonable training requirement. Eighteen other states and the District of Columbia already require this training. RBS training provides bartenders and servers with tools to effectively identify when a patron has had too much to drink and how to safely intervene if the patron attempts to get into their car. Responsible beverage training has been found to increase appropriate server practices, increase refusal to serve obviously intoxicated patrons, and decrease the percentage of intoxicated patrons leaving an establishment. Three years after Oregon mandated responsible beverage service training, fatal single vehicle nighttime crashes decreased by an estimated 23%." CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Contra Costa County would not have a position on the bill. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: AB 2121 bill text Attachment B: Alcohol and Other Drugs Advisory Board letter AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 388 AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 21, 2016 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 31, 2016 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY MAY 11, 2016 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 12, 2016 california legislature—2015–16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 2121 Introduced by Assembly Member Gonzalez (Coauthor: Assembly Member Eduardo Garcia) (Coauthor: Senator Pan) February 17, 2016 An act to add Article 4 (commencing with Section 25680) to Chapter 16 of Division 9 of the Business and Professions Code, relating to alcoholic beverages. legislative counsel’s digest AB 2121, as amended, Gonzalez. Alcoholic beverage control: Responsible Beverage Service Training Program Act of 2016. The Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, administered by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, regulates the granting of licenses for the manufacture, distribution, and sale of alcoholic beverages within the state. Under existing law, any on-sale license authorizes the sale of the alcoholic beverage specified in the license for consumption on the premises where sold and applications for the issuance or renewal of that license are signed under the penalty of perjury. Currently, the Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs (LEAD) program is a voluntary prevention and education program for retail licensees, their 95 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 389 employees, and applicants, regarding alcohol responsibility and the law. This bill would, in addition to the LEAD program, establish the Responsible Beverage Service (RBS) Training Program Act of 2016, beginning July 1, 2020, that would require an alcohol server, as defined, to successfully complete a certified an RBS training course offered by an accredited training provider within 3 months of employment and every 3 years thereafter. The bill would require a nonprofit organization that obtained a temporary daily on-sale or off-sale license to designate a person or persons to receive RBS training before the event and would require that person or those persons to remain on site for the duration of the event. The bill would provide that a certified an RBS training course include information on, among other things, state laws and regulations relating to alcoholic beverage control and the impact of alcohol on the body. The bill would require the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, on or before January 1, 2020, to establish a list published on the department’s Internet Web site of certified RBS training courses and would authorize the department to collect fees to cover the reasonable costs of certification and recertification of RBS training courses. review and approval of accreditation agencies. The bill, beginning January 1, 2019, would require the department to provide information on RBS training requirements on applications for, and renewals of, authorized licenses. The bill, beginning July 1, 2020, would require all authorized licensees to maintain, and provide upon request by the department, all records necessary to establish compliance with these provisions and would make it a misdemeanor for an authorized licensee, or that licensee’s agent or employee, to permit any alcoholic beverage to be consumed on the premises without possessing a valid training certificate or card. By creating a new provide that alcohol servers are subject to specified criminal and civil penalties. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. 95 — 2 —AB 2121 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 390 The people of the State of California do enact as follows: line 1 SECTION 1. This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the line 2 Responsible Beverage Service Training Program Act of 2016. line 3 SEC. 2. Article 4 (commencing with Section 25680) is added line 4 to Chapter 16 of Division 9 of the Business and Professions Code, line 5 to read: line 6 line 7 Article 4. Responsible Beverage Service (RBS) Training line 8 Program Act of 2016 line 9 line 10 25680. For purposes of this article: line 11 (a)  “Accredited training provider” means either of the line 12 following: line 13 (1)  A training provider accredited by the American National line 14 Standards Institute (ANSI) that meets ASTM International line 15 E2659-15 Standard Practice for Certificate Programs. line 16 (2)  A training provider accredited by an accreditation agency line 17 other than ANSI, provided the accreditation agency is authorized line 18 by the department to accredit training providers offering RBS line 19 training courses. line 20 (a) line 21 (b)  “Alcohol server” means a person who sells or serves line 22 alcoholic beverages, beverages directly to consumers, or a person line 23 who manages or supervises a person who sells or serves alcoholic line 24 beverages, beverages directly to consumers, including the onsite line 25 establishment owner of a licensed facility, for consumption on the line 26 premises of a licensed facility that includes, but is not limited to, line 27 one-day events, fairs, festivals, sporting events, and other special line 28 events. line 29 (b) line 30 (c)  “RBS training course” means a Responsible Beverage line 31 Service training course certified by the department pursuant to line 32 that meets the requirements of subdivision (b) of Section 25682. line 33 (c) line 34 (d)  “Self-training and assessment” means a process where the line 35 individual trains, and takes an assessment, without the presence line 36 or intervention of a trainer or instructor, instructor and includes, line 37 but is not limited to, training and assessment through the use of a line 38 computer program or the Internet. 95 AB 2121— 3 — AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 391 line 1 25681. (a)  Notwithstanding any laws to the contrary, beginning line 2 July 1, 2020, an alcohol server shall successfully complete a line 3 certified an RBS training course from an accredited training line 4 provider within three months of employment and every three years line 5 thereafter. line 6 (b)  The licensee shall ensure that those persons required to line 7 successfully complete a certified an RBS training course do so. A line 8 current certificate or card provided by any approved training course line 9 accredited training provider shall be sufficient documentation of line 10 successful completion and shall be accepted throughout the state. line 11 (c)  A nonprofit organization that has obtained a temporary daily line 12 on-sale license or a temporary daily off-sale license from the line 13 department shall designate a person or persons to receive RBS line 14 training prior to the event and that designated person or those line 15 designated persons shall remain on site for the duration of the line 16 event. line 17 (d)  An alcohol server shall be subject to the provisions of line 18 subdivisions (b) and (c) of Section 25602. line 19 25682. (a)  On or before January 1, 2020, the department shall line 20 establish a list, published on the department’s Internet Web site, line 21 of certified RBS training courses offered by accredited training line 22 providers that may be used to fulfill the requirements of Section line 23 25681. line 24 (b)  (1)  A certified An RBS training course shall consist of at line 25 least four hours of instruction and include, but shall not be limited line 26 to, the following information: line 27 (A)  The social impact of alcohol. line 28 (B)  The impact of alcohol on the body. line 29 (C)  State laws and regulations relating to alcoholic beverage line 30 control, including laws and regulations related to driving under line 31 the influence. line 32 (D)  Intervention techniques to prevent the service or sale of line 33 alcoholic beverages to underage persons or intoxicated patrons. line 34 (E)  The development of management policies that support the line 35 prevention of service or sale of alcoholic beverages to underage line 36 persons or intoxicated patrons. line 37 (F)  The course shall provide basic, introductory instruction on line 38 the elements described in subparagraphs (A) to (E), inclusive. line 39 (2)  An RBS training course may be offered through a trainer-led line 40 class and assessment or self-training and assessment. 95 — 4 —AB 2121 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 392 line 1 (3)  An RBS certificate or card shall be issued only upon line 2 successful completion of a certified an RBS training course and line 3 assessment. A minimum score of 70 percent on the assessment line 4 shall be required to successfully complete the course. line 5 (4)  A certified An RBS training course shall issue a certificate line 6 or card to individuals who successfully complete a course. The line 7 certificate or card shall be valid for three years from the original line 8 date of issuance, regardless of whether the alcohol server changes line 9 employers during that period. line 10 (5)  The department may, by regulation, establish additional line 11 training standards and curricula to be included in a certified an line 12 RBS training course. line 13 (c)  The department shall establish minimum standards and line 14 promulgate regulations for the training and scope of practice by line 15 January 1, 2018, for a person who sells or serves alcoholic line 16 beverages. line 17 (d) line 18 (c)  At least one certified RBS training course shall cost a line 19 participant no more than fifteen dollars ($15), inclusive of the line 20 certificate or card provided upon successful completion of the line 21 training course. At least one certified RBS training course shall line 22 be offered in Spanish. If no RBS training courses meet these line 23 requirements, Section 25681 shall not apply. line 24 (e)  The department shall review a certified RBS training course line 25 at least once every three years after the course is approved. line 26 (f)  The department may collect fees as part of the certification line 27 or recertification process to cover the reasonable costs associated line 28 with the certification and recertification of RBS training courses. line 29 (d)  The department may authorize an accreditation agency, in line 30 addition to ANSI, to accredit training providers to offer RBS line 31 training courses and may collect fees to cover the reasonable costs line 32 associated with the review and approval of that accreditation line 33 agency. line 34 25683. (a)  Beginning January 1, 2019, the department shall line 35 include information on the RBS training course requirement line 36 pursuant to Section 25681, including information on documentation line 37 requirements, on the application for an authorized license and with line 38 the license renewal notices sent to authorized licensees. 95 AB 2121— 5 — AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 393 line 1 (b)  Beginning July 1, 2020, all authorized licensees shall line 2 maintain, and provide upon request by the department, all records line 3 necessary to establish compliance with this section. line 4 (c)  Beginning July 1, 2020, an authorized licensee, or agent or line 5 employee of such that licensee, who permits any alcoholic beverage line 6 to be consumed by any person on the premises without possessing line 7 a valid training certificate or card is guilty of a misdemeanor. line 8 knowingly and intentionally employs an alcohol server that has line 9 not completed an RBS training course shall only be subject to the line 10 civil and administrative penalties authorized by this division. line 11 SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to line 12 Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution because line 13 the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school line 14 district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or line 15 infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty line 16 for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of line 17 the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within line 18 the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIIIB of the California line 19 Constitution. O 95 — 6 —AB 2121 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 394 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 395 RECOMMENDATION(S): CONSIDER adopting a Support position on Proposition 56: Cigarette Tax to Fund Healthcare, Tobacco Use Prevention, Research, and Law Enforcement, an initiative which seeks to Increase cigarette tax by $2 per pack, with equivalent increase on other tobacco products and electronic cigarettes containing nicotine, as recommended by the Legislation Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: No direct impact to the County from supporting the initiative. However, a successful initiative has an estimated fiscal impact on state and local government: Net increase in excise tax revenues in the range of $1.1 billion to $1.6 billion annually by 2017-18, with revenues decreasing slightly in subsequent years. The majority of funds would be used for payments to health care providers. The remaining funds would be used for a variety of specified purposes, including tobacco-related prevention and cessation programs, law enforcement programs, medical research on tobacco-related diseases, and early childhood development programs. BACKGROUND: Proposition 56 increases the cigarette tax by $2.00 per pack, with equivalent increase on other tobacco products and electronic cigarettes containing nicotine. The initiative allocates revenues primarily to increase funding for existing healthcare programs; also for tobacco use prevention/control programs, tobacco-related disease research and law enforcement, University of California physician training, dental disease prevention programs, and administration. This excludes these revenues from Proposition 98 funding requirements. If the tax causes decreased tobacco consumption, this initiative transfers tax revenues to offset decreases to existing tobacco-funded programs and sales tax revenues. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 25 To:Board of Supervisors From:LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Support position on Proposition 56 Cigarette Tax to Fund Healthcare, Tobacco Use Prevention, Research, and Law Enforcement AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 396 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 397 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) BACKGROUND Tobacco Products and Electronic Cigarettes Tobacco products are derived from tobacco plants, contain nicotine, and are intended for human consumption, such as cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. Electronic cigarettes are battery-operated products that are generally designed to deliver nicotine, flavor, and other chemicals. These devices turn chemicals, including nicotine, into an aerosol that is inhaled by the user. Some types of electronic cigarettes are sold together with those chemicals, while others are sold separately. (There are also some electronic cigarettes that produce aerosols that do not contain nicotine.) Tobacco and Electronic Cigarette Taxes Tobacco products are subject to state and federal excise taxes, and state and local sales and use taxes. In contrast, electronic cigarettes are currently not subject to state and federal excise taxes but are subject to state and local sales and use taxes. Existing State Excise Taxes on Tobacco Products. Current state law imposes excise taxes on the distribution of cigarettes and other tobacco products, such as cigars and chewing tobacco. Tobacco excise taxes are paid by distributors who supply cigarettes and other tobacco products to retail stores. These taxes are typically passed on to consumers as higher prices on cigarettes and other tobacco products. The state’s cigarette excise tax is currently 87 cents per pack. Figure 1 of Attachment B describes the different components of the per-pack tax. As the figure shows, two voter-approved measures—Proposition 99 in 1988 and Proposition 10 in 1998—are responsible for generating the vast majority of tobacco excise tax revenues. As the figure indicates, total state revenues from existing excise taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products were just under $840 million in 2014-15. Revenues from existing excise taxes on other tobacco products support Proposition 10 and Proposition 99 purposes. Under current law, any increase in cigarette taxes automatically triggers an equivalent increase in excise taxes on other tobacco products, with the latter revenues going to support Proposition 99 purposes. Existing Federal Excise Tax on Tobacco Products. The federal government imposes an excise tax on cigarettes and other tobacco products. In 2009, this tax was increased by 62 cents per pack (to a total of $1.01 per pack) to help fund the Children’s Health Insurance Program, which provides subsidized health insurance coverage to children in low-income families. Existing State and Local Sales and Use Taxes on Tobacco Products and Electronic Cigarettes. Sales of cigarettes, other tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes are subject to state and local sales and use taxes. These taxes are imposed on the retail price of a product, which includes excise taxes that have generally been passed along from distributors. The average retail price of a pack of cigarettes in California currently is close to $6. Roughly $400 million in annual revenue from sales and use taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products go to the state and local governments. State and Local Health Programs Department of Health Care Services (DHCS). The DHCS administers the Medicaid program, known as the California Medical Assistance Program (Medi-Cal) in California. MediCal is a joint federal-state program that provides health care services to qualified low-income persons. Currently, Medi-Cal provides health care services to over 12 million people, with a General Fund budget estimated at $18 billion for 2015-16. Federal law establishes some minimum requirements for state Medicaid programs regarding the types of services offered and who is eligible to receive them. Required services include hospital inpatient and outpatient care, skilled nursing care, and doctor visits. In addition, California offers an array of services considered optional under federal law, such as coverage of prescription drugs and durable medical equipment. While Medi-Cal is by far the largest healthcare program that DHCS administers in terms of both funding level and persons served, the department also AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 398 administers a few other programs that provide health care services. Department of Public Health (DPH). The DPH administers and oversees a wide variety of programs with the goal of optimizing the health and well-being of Californians. The department’s programs address a broad range of health issues, including tobacco-related diseases, maternal and child health, cancer and other chronic diseases, communicable disease control, and inspection of health facilities. Many public health programs and services are delivered at the local level, while the state provides funding, oversight, and overall strategic leadership for improving population health. The state also centrally administers certain public health programs, such as licensing and certification of health facilities. State Spending Limit The State Constitution contains various rules affecting the state budget, such as the state spending limit that has been in place since passage of Proposition 4 in 1979. The Constitution requires the state to issue taxpayer rebates if the state exceeds the spending limit. See Attachment A for the full text of the measure and Attachment B for the full report by the Legislative Analyst's Office. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: There would be no record of the County's support for the ballot initiative. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Proposition 56 Cigarette Tax to Fund Healthcare, Tobacco Use Prevention, Research, and Law Enforcement Attachment B: Legislative Analyst's Office fiscal impact analysis AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 399 1 5 -0 0 8 1 Arndt.# I November 10, 2015 ~CEIVfb VIA MESSENGER Office of the Attorney General Attention: Ashley Johansson, Initiative Coordinator 1300 "I" Street Sacramento, CA 95814 NOV 1 2 2015 INITIATIVE COORDINATC ATIORNEY GENERAL'S n· RE: Submission of Amendment to Statewide Initiative Measure - California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of2016, No. 15-0081 Dear Ms. Johansson: As you know, I serve as counsel for the proponents of the proposed statewide initiative, "California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of2016." The proponents ofthe proposed initiative are Dustin Corcoran, Laphonza Butler and Olivia J. (Gertz) Diaz-Lapham. On their behalf: I am enclosing the following documents: • The amended text of "California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of2016" • A red-line version showing the changes made in the amended text • Signed autl1orizations from each of the proponents for the submission of the amended text together with their requests that the Attorney General's Office prepare a circulating title and summary using the amended text. Please continue to direct all inquiries or correspondence relative to this proposed initiative to me at the address listed below: Lance H. Olson Olson, Hagel & Fishburn LLP 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1425 Sacramento, CA 95814 Very truly yours, OLSON HAGEL & FISHBURN LLP LU, LANCE H. OLSON LHO:mdm I:\WPDOC\PUBLIC\POL\40295-4\AG Amendment Cover Letter 11.10.15.doc www.olsonhagel.com ~~ AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 400 VIA MESSENGER November 3, 2016 Office of the Attorney General 1300 "I" Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Attention: Ashley Johansson, Initiative Coordinator Re: Submission of Amendment to California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016, No. 15-0081, and Request to Prepare Circulating Title and Summary Dear Ms. Johansson: On October 7, 2015, the proponents of a proposed statewide initiative titled "California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of2016" ("Initiative") submitted a request that the Attorney General prepare a circulating title and summary pursuant to section 1 0( d) of Article II of the California Constitution. Pursuant to Elections Code section 9002(b ), the proponents hereby submit timely amendments to the text of the Initiative. As one of the proponents of the Initiative, I approve the submission of the amended text to the Initiative and I declare that the amendment is reasonably germane to the theme, purpose, and subject of the Initiative. I request that the Attorney General prepare a circulating title and summary using the amended Initiative. Dustin orcoran Chief Executive Officer, California Medical Association AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 401 VIA MESSENGER November 3, 2016 Office of the Attorney General 1300 "I" Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Attention: Ashley Johansson, Initiative Coordinator Re: Submission of Amendment to California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of2016, No. 15-0081, and Request to Prepare Circulating Title and Summary Dear Ms. Johansson: On October 7, 2015, the proponents of a proposed statewide initiative titled "California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of2016" ("Initiative") submitted a request that the Attorney General prepare a circulating title and summary pursuant to section 1 0( d) of Article II of the California Constitution. Pursuant to Elections Code section 9002(b ), the proponents hereby submit timely amendments to the text of the Initiative. As one of the proponents of the Initiative, I approve the submission of the amended text to the Initiative and I declare that the amendment is reasonably germane to the theme, purpose, and subject of the Initiative. I request that the Attorney General prepare a circulating title and summary using the amended Initiative. ,)? c:{2~tler President, SEIU California State Council AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 402 VIA MESSENGER November 3, 2016 Office of the Attorney General 1300 "I" Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Attention: Ashley Johansson, Initiative Coordinator Re: Submission of Amendment to California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of2016, No. 15~0081, and Request to Prepare Circulating Title and Summary Dear Ms. Johansson: On October 7, 2015, the proponents of a proposed statewide initiative titled "California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of2016" ("Initiative") submitted a request that the Attorney General prepare a circulating title and summary pursuant to section 1 0( d) of Article II of the California Constitution. Pursuant to Elections Code section 9002(b ), the proponents hereby submit timely amendments to the text of the Initiative. As one of the proponents of the Initiative, I approve the submission of the amended text to the Initiative and I declare that the amendment is reasonably germane to the theme, purpose, and subject of the Initiative. I request that the Attorney General prepare a circulating title and summary using the amended Initiative. Sincerely, (JL__ ~.b...)\~ ~~,lr-· - Olivia J. (Gertz) Diaz~Lapham President and Chief Executive Officer American Lung Association in California AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 403 November 13, 2015 VIA PERSONAL DELIVERY Ashley Johansson, Initiative Coordinator Office of the Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17th Floor, P.O. Box 9442 5 5 Sacramento, CA 95 814 ~CEIVEo NOV 17 2015 INITIATIVE COORDINATOR ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE Re: Request for to Add Proponent to Proposed Initiative D.ear Ms. Johansson: Pursuant to Article II, Section lO(d) of the California Constitution, the attached proposed Initiative, entitled the "California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016," was submitted to your office on October 7, 2015. I request to be added as a proponent of this measure. I also request that your office prepare a title and summary. Included with this submission is the required proponent affidavit pursuant to sections 9001 and 9608 of the California Elections Code. All inquiries or correspondence relative to this initiative should be directed to Lance H. Olson at Olson, Hagel & Fishburn, LLP, 5 5 5 Capito I Ma 11, Suite 1415, Sacramento, CA 95 814, (916) 442-2952. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, 2:::ey!~ Businessman and Philanthropist AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 404 November 3, 2015 VIA PERSONAL DELIVERY Ashley Johansson, Initiative Coordinator Office of the Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17th Floor, P.O. Box 9442 5 5 Sacramento, CA 95 814 Re: Request to Add Proponent to Proposed Initiative Dear Ms. Johansson: Pursuant to Article II, Section lO(d) of the California Constitution, the "California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016" was submitted to your office on October 7, 2015. Tom Steyer has requested that his name be added as a proponent of this measure and is submitting the required proponent affidavit pursuant to sections 9001 and 9608 of the California Elections Code. As a current proponent of this measure, I agree to the addition of Mr. Steyer as a proponent. All inquiries or correspondence relative to this initiative should be directed to Lance H. Olson at Olson, Hagel & Fishburn, LLP, 5 5 5 Capito I Ma 11, Suite 1415, Sacramento, CA 95 814, (916) 442-2952. Thank you for your assistance. Dustin Corcoran Chief Executive Officer California Medical Association AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 405 November 3, 2015 VIA PERSONAL DELIVERY Ashley Johansson, Initiative Coordinator Office of the Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17th Floor, P.O. Box 9442 5 5 Sacramento, CA 95 814 Re: Request to Add Proponent to Proposed Initiative Dear Ms. Johansson: Pursuant to Article II, Section lO(d) of the California Constitution, the "California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016" was submitted to your office on October 7, 2015. Tom Steyer has requested that his name be added as a proponent of this measure and is submitting the required proponent affidavit pursuant to sections 9001 and 9608 of the California Elections Code. As a current proponent of this measure, I agree to the addition of Mr. Steyer as a proponent. All inquiries or correspondence relative to this initiative should be directed to Lance H. Olson at Olson, Hagel & Fishburn, LLP, 5 5 5 Capito I Ma 11, Suite 1415, Sacramento, CA 95 814, {916) 442-2952. Thank you for your assistance. Laphonza Butler President SEIU California State Council AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 406 November 3, 2015 VIA PERSONAL DELIVERY Ashley Johansson, Initiative Coordinator Office of the Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17th Floor, P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 95 814 Re: Request to Add Proponent to Proposed Initiative Dear Ms. J o h a n s so n : Pursuant to Article II, Section lO(d) of the California Constitution, the "California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016" was submitted to your office on October 7, 2015. Tom Steyer has requested that his name be added as a proponent of this measure and is submitting the required proponent affidavit pursuant to sections 9001 and 9608 of the California Elections Code. As a current proponent of this measure, I agree to the addition of Mr. Steyer as a proponent. All inquiries or correspondence relative to this initiative should be directed to Lance H. Olson at Olson, Hagel & Fishburn, LLP, 5 5 5 Capito I Ma 11, Suite 1415, Sacramento, CA 95 814, (916) 442-2952. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, OL..,~~ ~°)4.k-- Olivia J. (Gertz) Diaz-Lapham President and Chief Executive Officer American Lung Association in California AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 407 1 5 -o o a 1 Arndt.# I The people of the State of California do enact as follows: THE CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 SECTION 1. Findings and Declarations (a) Tobacco use is the single most preventable cause of death and disease in California, claiming the lives of more than 40,000 people every year. Each year thousands of Californians require medical and dental treatment as a result of tobacco use. (b) Healthcare treatment of all types of cancer, cardiovascular and lung disease, oral disease and tobacco-related diseases continues to impose a significant financial burden upon California's overstressed healthcare system. Tobacco use costs Californians more than $13.29 billion in healthcare expenses every year, of which $3.5 billion is paid for by taxpayers through existing healthcare programs and services that provide healthcare, treatment, and services for Californians. The cost of lost productivity due to tobacco use adds an additional estimated $10.35 billion to the annual economic consequences of smoking and tobacco use in California. (c) An increase in the tobacco tax is an appropriate way to decrease tobacco use and mitigate the costs ofhealthcare treatment and improve existing programs providing for quality healthcare and access to healthcare services for families and children. It will save lives and save state and local government money in the future. (d) An increase in funding for existing healthcare programs and services that treat all types of cancer, cardiovascular and lung disease, oral disease and tobacco-related diseases and conditions will expand the number of healthcare providers that treat patients with such diseases and conditions. Funds spent for this purpose can be used to match federal funds, with the federal government putting up as much as nine dollars for every dollar spent from this fund. 1 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 408 (e) Most electronic cigarettes contain nicotine, which is derived from tobacco and is a highly addictive drug. Electronic cigarettes are currently not subject to any tobacco taxation, making them cheaper and potentially more attractive, especially to young people. (f) There are more than 470 electronic cigarette brands for sale today offered in over 7, 700 flavors including candy-flavors that appeal to youth, such as Captain Crunch, gummy bear, cotton candy, Atomic Fireball, and fruit loops. The fastest growing age range for electronic cigarettes is middle school and high school students and according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, electronic cigarette use among this group tripled from 2013 to 2014. (g) Research into the causes, early detection, and effective treatment, care, prevention, and potential cures of all types of cancer, cardiovascular and lung disease, oral disease and tobacco-related diseases will ultimately save lives and save state and local government money in the future. (h) There is an urgent need for research in California for new and effective treatments for all types of cancer, cardiovascular and lung disease, oral disease and tobacco-related diseases. Such research transforms scientific discoveries into clinical applications that reduce the incidence and mortality of such diseases and conditions. (i) Funding prevention programs designed to discourage individuals, particularly youth, from taking up smoking and the use of other tobacco products through health education and health promotion programs will save lives and save state and local government money in the future. (j) A reinvigorated tobacco control program will allow targeted public health efforts to combat the tobacco industry's predatory marketing to ethnic groups, driving down smoking rates and ultimately reducing cancer, cardiovascular and lung disease, oral disease and tobacco-related diseases in these California communities. (k) Funding implem-entation and administrative programs to support law enforcement efforts to reduce illegal sales of tobacco products to minors, 2 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 409 cigarette smuggling, and tobacco tax evasion will save lives and save state and local government money in the future. (I) California faces a shortage of physicians and dentists to meet the growing healthcare needs of its residents. As a result, access to primary and oral healthcare, treatment for tobacco-related diseases, regular check- ups and other urgent healthcare needs will suffer. California taxpayers support the education of thousands of medical and dental students every year, yet because of limits on the number of residency programs, many of those physicians and dentists are forced out of state to continue their training, leaving patients in California without access to care. Funding implementation and administrative programs that will help keep hundreds more doctors in California every year to improve the health of Californians will save lives and save state and local government money in the future. (m) Medical studies have shown that the smoking of cigarettes and use of other tobacco products affects oral health by causing dental disease, including gum disease and bone loss, cancers of the mouth and throat, and severe tooth wear. Smoking causes half of the cases of gum disease, which results in increased tooth loss. Oral cancer risk for smokers is at least six times higher than for nonsmokers and 75% of all oral cancer in the United States is related to tobacco use. Oral cancer risk for smokeless tobacco increases SO-fold over nonsmokers. There is an association between maternal smoking during pregnancy and cleft lip development in fetuses. Tobacco cessation reduces the risk of mouth and throat cancer by 50%. Funding programs that ed~cate, prevent and treat dental diseases, including those caused by use of tobacco, will improve the lives of Californians and save state and local government money in the future. (n) Increasing the cost of cigarettes and tobacco products is widely recognized as the most effective way to reduce smoking across California, especially by young people. The 2000 U.S. Surgeon General's Report, Reducing Tobacco Use, found that raising tobacco-product prices decreases the prevalence of tobacco use, particularly among kids and young adults, and that tobacco tax increases produce "substantial long-term improvements in health." From its review of existing research, the report concluded that raising tobacco taxes is one of the most effective tobacco 3 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 410 prevention and control strategies. Reducing smoking saves lives and saves state and local government money in the future. {o) Because increasing the tobacco tax will reduce smoking and the use of other tobacco products, it is important to protect existing tobacco tax funded programs from a decline in tax revenues. {p) California currently taxes cigarettes at only $0.87 per pack, and ranks 35th in tobacco tax rates, reflecting one of the lowest tobacco taxes in the United States. As of January, 2016, the national average will be $1.60 per pack. Thirty-two states have cigarette tax rates of $1 per pack or higher, and California is well below other western states {Washington: $3.025; Oregon: $1.31; Nevada: $1.80; and Arizona: $2). California last raised its tobacco tax in 1998. SECTION 2. Statement of Purpose The purpose of this act is to increase the tax on tobacco and other tobacco products, including electronic cigarettes, in order to: {a) Save the lives of Californians and save state and local government money in the future by reducing smoking and tobacco use among all Californians, but particularly youth. {b) Provide funds to increase funding for existing healthcare programs and services that treat all types of cancer, cardiovascular and lung disease, oral disease and tobacco-related diseases, expand the number of healthcare providers, and maximize federal funding for these programs and services. {c) Provide funds to support research into the causes of and cures for all types of cancer, cardiovascular and lung disease, oral disease and tobacco- related diseases, and to transform such scientific discoveries into clinical applications to reduce the incidence and mortality of such diseases· and conditions. {d) Provide funds to support prevention programs aimed at discouraging individuals from using cigarettes and other tobacco products, including 4 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 411 electronic cigarettes. (e) Provide funds for implementation and administrative purposes to reduce cigarette smuggling, tobacco tax evasion, and illegal sales of tobacco products to minors, fund medical training for new doctors to treat diseases, including those caused by tobacco use, and fund programs to prevent and treat dental diseases including those caused by tobacco use. (f) Protect existing tobacco tax funded programs, which currently save Californians millions of dollars in healthcare costs. (g) Provide a full accounting of how funds raised are s'pent to further the purposes of this act without creating new bureaucracies. SECTION 3. Definition of Tobacco Products Section 30121 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read: 30121. For purposes of this article: (a) "Cigarettes" has the same meaning as in Section 30003, as it read on January 1, 1988. (b) "Tobacco products" includes, but is not limited to, all forms of cigars, smoking tobacco, chmving tobacco, snuff, and any other articles or products made of, or containing at least 50 percent, tobacco a product containing~ made~ or derived from tobacco or nicotine that is intended for human consumption whether smoked~ heated~ chewed~ absorbed~ dissolved~ inhaled~ snorted~ sniffed~ or ingested by any other means~ including~ but not limited to~ cigars~ little cigars~ chewing tobacco~ pipe tobacco~ or snuff, but does not include cigarettes. Tobacco products shall also include electronic cigarettes. Tobacco products shall not include· any product that has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco cessation product or for other therapeutic purposes where that product is marketed and sold solely for such approved use. Tobacco products does not include any food products as that term is defined pursuant to section 6359: 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 412 (c) "Electronic cigarettes" means any device or delivery system sold in combination with nicotine which can be used to deliver to a person nicotine in aerosolized or vaporized form, including, but not limited to, an e- cigarette; e-cigar, e-pipe, vape pen ore-hookah. Electronic cigarettes include any component, part or accessory of such a device that is used during the operation of the device when sold in combination with any liquid or substance containing nicotine. Electronic cigarettes also include any liquid or substance containing nicotine, whether sold separately or sold in combination with any device that could be used to deliver to a person nicotine in aerosolized or vaporized form. Electronic cigarettes do not include any device not sold in combination with any liquid or substance containing nicotine, or any battery, battery charger, carrying case or other accessory not used in the operation of the device if sold separately. Electronic cigarettes shall not include any product that has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco cessation product or for other therapeutic purposes where that product is marketed and sold solely for such approved use. As used in this subdivision nicotine does not include any food products as that term is defined pursuant to section 6359. {t}(d) "Fund" means the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Surtax Fund created by Section 30122. Section 30131.1 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read: 30131.1. The following definitions apply for purposes of this article: (a) "Cigarette" has the same meaning as in Section 3000r?' as it read on January 1, 1997. ', (b) "Tobacco products" includes, but is not limited to, all forms of cigars, smoking tobacco, chmving tobacco, snuff, and any other articles or products made of, or containing at least 50 percent, tobacco, but does not include cigarettes shall have the same meaning as in subdivision (b) of Section 30121, as amended by the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016. 6 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 413 SECTION 4. The CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 30130.50) is added to Chapter 2 of Part 13 of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, to read: § 30130.50. Definitions For the purposes of this article: (a) aCigarette;t has the same meaning as that in Section 30003 as it read on January 1, 2015. (b) ''Tobacco products// has the same meaning as that in subdivision (b) of Section 30121, as amended by this act. § 30130.51. CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Cigarette Distribution Tax (a) In addition to any other taxes imposed upon the distribution of cigarettes under this part, there shall be imposed an additional tax upon every distributor of cigarettes at the rate of one hundred mills {$0.100) for each cigarette distributed on or after the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more than 90 days after the effective date of this act. (b) The board shall adopt regulations providing for the implementation of an equivalent tax on electronic cigarettes as that term is defined in subdivision (c) of Section 30121, and the methods for collection of the tax. Such regulations shall include imposition of an equivalent tax on any device intended to be used to deliver aerosolized or vaporized nicotine to the person inhaling from the device when sold separately or as a package; any component, part, or accessory of such a device that is used during the operation of the device, whether sold separately or as a package with such device; and any liquid or substance containing nicotine, whether sold separately or as a package with any device that would allow it to be 7 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 414 inhaled. Such regulations may include/ but are not limited to/ defining who is a distributor of electronic cigarettes pursuant to Section 30011 and the licensing requirements of any such person. (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part/ all revenues resulting from the tax imposed by subdivision (a) of this section and all revenues resulting from ~he equivalent increase in the tax on tobacco products/ including electronic cigarettes/ imposed by subdivision (b) of Section 30123/ shall be deposited into the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE/ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund created by Section 30130.53. § 30130.52. CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE/ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Cigarette Floor Taxes (a) {1} In addition to any other tax/ every dealer and wholesaler/ for the privilege of holding or storing cigarettes for sale/ use/ or consumption, shall pay a floor stock tax for each cigarette in its possession or under its control in this state at 12:01 a.m. on the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more than 90 days after the effective date of this act at the rate of one hundred mills {$0.100} for each cigarette. {2} Every dealer and wholesaler shall file a return with the board on or before the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more than 180 days after the effective date of this act on a form prescribed by the board/ showing the number of cigarettes in its possession or under its control in this state at 12:01 a.m. on the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more than 90 days after the effective date of this act. The amount of tax shall be computed and shown on the return. (b) {1} Every licensed cigarette distributor, for the privilege of distributing cigarettes and for holding or storing cigarettes for sale/ use/ or consumption, shall pay a cigarette indicia adjustment tax for each California cigarette tax stamp that is affixed to any package of cigarettes and for each unaffixed California cigarette tax stamp in its possession or under its control at 12:01 a.m. on the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing more than 90 days after the effective date of this act at the following rates: 8 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 415 (A) Two dollars and fifty cents {$2.50} for each stamp bearing the designation N25. N (B) Two dollars {$2} for each stamp bearing the designation N20.N {C) One dollar {$1} for each stamp bearing the designation N10. N {2} Every licensed cigarette distributor shall file a return with the board on or before the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing 180 days after the effective date of this act on a form prescribed by the board, showing the number of stamps described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and {C) of paragraph {1}. The amount of tax shall be computed and shown on the return. (c) The taxes required to be paid by this section are due and payable on or before the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing 180 days after the effective date of this act. Payments shall be made by remittances · payable to the board and the payments shall accompany the return and forms required to be filed by this section. (d) Any amount required to be paid by this section that is not timely paid shall bear interest at the rate and by the method established pursuant to Section 30202 from the first day of the first calendar quarter commencing 180 days after the effective date of this act, until paid, and shall be subject to determination, and redetermination, and any penalties provided with respect to determinations and redeterminations. § 30130.53. CALIFORNIA HEAL THCARE, RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund (a) The CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund is hereby established in the State Treasury. (b) All revenues raised pursuant to the taxes imposed by this article, less refunds made pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 30361} of Chapter 6, shall be deposited into the CALIFORNIA HEAL THCARE, RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund. 9 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 416 (c) Notwithstanding any other lawJ the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCAR( RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund is a trust fund established solely to carry out the purposes of this act and all revenues deposited into the CALIFORNIA HEAL THCAREJ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 FundJ together with interest earned by the fundJ are hereby continuously appropriated for the purposes of this act without regard to fiscal year and shall be expended only in accordance with the provisions ·of this act and its purposes. (d) Notwithstanding any other lawJ revenues deposited into the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCAREJ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 FundJ including any interest earned by the fundJ shall only be used for the specific purposes set forth in this actJ and shall be appropriated and expended only for the purposes expressed in this act and shall not be subject to appropriation reversionJ or transfer by the LegislatureJ the GovernorJ the Director of FinanceJ or the Controller for any purpose other than those specified in this actJ nor shall such revenues be loaned to the General Fund or any other fund of the state or any local government fund. § 30130.54. CALIFORNIA HEALTHCAREJ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Effect on Tobacco Consumption and Tax Revenue (a) The board shall determine within one year of the effective date of this actJ and annually thereafterJ the effect that the additional taxes imposed on cigarettes by this artic/eJ and the resulting increase in the tax on tobacco products required by subdivision (b) of Section 30123J have on the consumption of cigarettes and tobacco products in this state. fo the extent that a decrease in consumption is determined by the board to be a direct result of the additional tax imposed on cigarettes by this artic/eJ and the resulting increase in the tax on tobacco products required by subdivision (b) of Section 30123J the board shall determine the fiscal effect the decrease in consumption has on the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Surtax Fund created by Section 30122 {Proposition 99 as approved by the voters at the November BJ 1988J statewide general election)J the Breast Cancer Fund created by Section 30461.6J and the California Children and Families Trust Fund created by Section 30131 {Proposition 10 as approved by the voters at 10 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 417 the November 3~ ·1998~ statewide general election)~ and the revenues derived from Section 30101. (b) The Controller shall transfer from the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE~ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund to those affected funds described in subdivision (a) the amount necessary to offset the revenue decrease directly resulting from the imposition of additional taxes by this article. (c) The board shall determine within one year of the effective date of this act~ and annually thereafter~ the effect~ if any~ that the additional taxes imposed on cigarettes by this article~ and the resulting increase in the tax on tobacco products required by subdivision (b) of Section 30123~ have on the consumption of cigarettes and tobacco products in this state~ including from the illegal sale of cigarettes and tobacco products. To the extent that there is a Joss of state or local government sales and use tax revenues and such Joss is determined by the board to be a direct result of the additional tax imposed on cigarettes by this article~ and the resulting increase in the tax on tobacco products required by subdivision (b) of Section 30123~ including from the illegal sale of cigarettes and tobacco products~ the board shall determine the fiscal effect on state and local government sales and use tax revenues. (d) The Controller shall transfer from the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE~ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund to the general fund of the state and those affected local governments described in subdivision (c) the amount necessary to offset the state and local sales and use tax revenue decrease direCtly resulting from the imposition of additional taxes by this article~ including from the illegal sale of cigarettes and tobacco products. (e) Transfers under this section shall be made by the Controller at such times as the Controller determines necessary to further the intent of this section. § 30130.55. CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE~ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Distribution of Revenue 11 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 418 After deducting and transferring the necessary funds pursuant to Section 30130.54 and subdivisions (a)~ (b)~ (c)~ (d)~ and (e) of Section 30130.57~ the Controller shall annually allocate and transfer the remaining funds in the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE~ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund as follows: (a) Eighty-two percent (82%} shall be transferred to the Healthcare Treatment Fund~ which is hereby created~ and shall be used by the California Department of Health Care Services to increase funding for the existing healthcare programs and services described in Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000} to Chapter 8.9 (commencing with Section 14700}~ inclusive~ of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code~ including those that provide healthcare~ treatment~ and services for Californians with tobacco-related diseases and conditions~ by providing improved payments~ for all healthcare~ treatment~ and services described in Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 14000} to Chapter 8.9 (commencing with Section 14700}~ inclusive~ of Part 3 of Division 9 of the Welfare and Institutions Code. To the extent possible given the limits of funding under this article~ payments and support for the nonfederal share of payments for healthcare~ services~ and treatment shall be increased based on criteria developed and periodically updated as part of the annual state budget process~ provided that these funds shall not be used to supplant existing state general funds for these same purposes. These criteria shall include~ but not be limited to~ ensuring timely access~ limiting specific geographic shortages of services~ or ensuring quality care. Consistent with federal law~ the funding shall be used to draw down federal funds. The funding shall be used only for care provided by health care professionals~ clinics~ health facilities that are licensed pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1250~ and to health plans contracting with the California Department of Health Care Services to provide health benefits pursuant to this section. The funding can be used for the nonfederal share of payments from governmental entities where applicable. The department shan if required~ seek any necessary federal approval for the implementation of this section. (b) Thirteen percent (13%} shall be used for the purpose of funding comprehensive tobacco prevention and control programs; provided that these funds are not to be used to supplant existing state or local funds for these same purposes. These funds shall be apportioned in the following 12 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 419 manner: (1} Eighty-five percent {85%} to the California Department of Public Health Tobacco Control Program to be used for the tobacco control programs described beginning at Section 104375 of the Health and Safety Code. The California Department of Public Health shall award funds to state and local governmental agencies~ tribes~ universities and colleges~ community based organizations~ and other qualified agencies for the implementation evaluation and dissemination of evidence- based health promotion and health communication activities in order to monitor~ evaluate and reduce tobacco and nicotine use~ tobacco-related disease rates~ tobacco-related health disparities~ and develop a stronger evidence-base of effective prevention programming with not less than fifteen percent {15%} of health promotion, health communication activities~ and evaluation and tobacco use surveillance funds being awarded to accelerate and monitor the rate of decline in tobacco- related disparities with the goal of eliminating tobacco-related disparities. {2} Fifteen percent {15%} to the California Department of Education to be used for school programs to prevent and reduce the use of tobacco and nicotine products by young people as described in Section 104420 of the Health and Safety Code with not less than fifteen percent {15%} of these funds being awarded to accelerate and monitor the rate of decline in tobacco-related disparities for the purpose of eliminating tobacco- related disparities. (c) Five percent {5%} to the University of California for medical research of cancer~ heart and lung tobacco-related diseases pursuant to Article 2 (commencing with Section 104500} of Chapter 1 of Part 3 of Division 103 of the Health and Safety Code to supplement the Cigarette and Tobacco Products Surtax Medical Research Program~ provided that these funds be used under the following conditions: {1} The funds shall be used for grants and contracts for basic~ applied~ and translational medical research in California into the prevention ot early detection ot treatments for~ complementary treatments for~ and potential cures for all types of cancer, cardiovascular and lung disease~ 13 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 420 oral disease and tobacco-related diseases. Notwithstanding any other provision of lawJ the University of CaliforniaJ through the Tobacco Related Disease Research ProgramJ shall have authority to expend funds received under this act for the purposes set forth in this subdivision. {2} Any grants and contracts awarded shall be awarded using existing medical research program infrastructure and on the basis of scientific merit as determined by an open competitive peer review process that assures objectivityJ consistencyJ and high quality. {3} Individuals or entities that receive the grants and contracts pursuant to this subdivision must reside or be located entirely within California. {4} The research must be performed entirely within California. {5} The funds shall not be used to supplant existing state or local funds for these same purposes. § 30130.56. Independent Audit and Disclosure To provide full public accountability concerning the uses to which funds from the CALIFORNIA HEAL THCAREJ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 are putJ and to ensure full compliance with the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCAREJ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016: (a) The nonpartisan California State Auditor shall conduct at least biennially an independent financial audit of the state and local agencies receiving funds pursuant to the CALIFORNIA HEAL THCAREJ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016. An audit conducted pursuant to this section shall includeJ but not be limited toJ a review of the administrative costs expended by the state agencies that administer the fund. (b) Based on the independent auditJ the nonpartisan California State Auditor shall prepare a report detailing its review and include any recommendations for improvements. The report shall be made available to 14 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 421 the public. (c) Each state agency and department receiving funds pursuant to this act shan on an annual basis, publish on its respective Internet Web site an accounting of how much money was received from the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund and how that money was spent. The annual accounting shall also be posted on any social media outlets the state agency or department deems appropriate. (d) The use of the funds received by the California Department of Healthcare Services pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 30130.55 shall be subject to the same restrictions, including, but not limited to audits and prevention of fraud, imposed by existing law. (e) The use of the funds received by the California Department of Public Health, the California Department of Education and the University of California pursuant to subdivisions (b) and (c) of Section 30130.55 shall be subject to oversight by the Tobacco Education and Research Oversight Committee pursuant to Health and Safety Code Sections 104365 and 104370. § 30130.57. Implementation and Administrative Costs {a) Moneys from the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund shall be used to reimburse the board for expenses incurred in the administration, calculation, and collection of the tax imposed by this article and for expenses incurred in the calculation and distribution of funds and in the promulgation of regulations as required by this act; provided, however, that after deducting the necessary funds pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 30130.54, not more than five percent {5%) annually of the funds remaining in the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund shall be used for such administrative costs. {b) Moneys from the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund shall be used to reimburse the independent nonpartisan California State Auditor up to four hundred 15 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 422 thousand dollars ($400/000} annually for actual costs incurred to conduct each of the audits required by Section 30130.56 for the purpose of providing public transparency and ensuring that the revenues generated by this article are used for healthcare/ tobacco use prevention and research. (c) Moneys from the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE/ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund in the amount of forty million dollars ($40/000/000) annually shall be used to provide funding to the University of California for the purpose and goal of increasing the number of primary care and emergency physicians trained in California. This goal shall be achieved by providing this funding to the University of California to sustain/ retain and expand graduate medical education programs to achieve the goal of increasing the number of primary care and emergency physicians in the State of California based on demonstrated workforce needs and priorities. (1} For the purposes of this subdivision/ //primary care// means Internal Medicine/ Family Medicine/ Obstetrics I Gynecology/ and Pediatrics. (2} Funding shall be prioritized for direct graduate medical education costs for programs serving medically underserved areas and populations. {3} For the purposes of this subdivision all allopathic and osteopathic residency programs accredited byfederally recognized accrediting organizations and located in California shall be eligible to apply to receive funding to support resident education in California. (4} The University of California shall annually review physician shortages by specialty across the state and by region. Based on this review/ to the extent that there are demonstrated state or regional shortages of non-primary care physicians/ funds may be used to expand graduate medical education programs that are intended to address such shortages. 16 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 423 (d) Moneys from the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCAREJ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund in the amount of thirty million dollars {$30JOOOJOOO) annually shall be used to provide funding to the State of California Department of Public Health State Dental Program for the purpose and goal of educating aboutJ preventing and treating dental diseaseJ including dental disease caused by use of cigarettes and other tobacco products. This goal shall be achieved by the program providing this funding to activities that support the State Dental Plan based on demonstrated oral health needsJ prioritizing serving underserved areas and populations. Funded program activities shall includeJ but not be limited toJ the following: education, disease prevention, disease treatmentJ surveillanceJ and case management. The department shall have broad authority to fully implement and effectuate the purposes of this subdivision including the determination of underserved communitiesJ the development of program protocolsJ the authority to reimburse state-sponsored services related to the program, and the authority to contract with one or more individuals or public or private entities to provide program activities. (e) Moneys from the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCAREJ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund in the amount of forty eight million dollars {$48JOOOJOOO) annually shall be used for the purpose of funding Jaw enforcement efforts to reduce illegal sales of tobacco productsJ particularly illegal sales to minors; to reduce cigarette smugglingJ tobacco tax evasion the sale of tobacco products without a license and the sale of counterfeit tobacco products; to enforce tobacco-related JawsJ court judgments and legal settlements; and to conduct Jaw enforcement training and technical assistance activities for tobacco-related statutes; provided that these funds are not to be used to supplant existing state or local funds for these same purposes. These funds shall be apportioned in the following manner: {1) Thirty million dollars {$30JOOOJOOO) annually to go to the California Department of Justice/Office of the Attorney General to be distributed to local law enforcement agencies to support and hire front-line Jaw enforcement peace officers for programsJ includingJ but not limited toJ enforcement of state and local laws related to the illegal sales and 17 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 424 marketing of tobacco to minors~ and increasing investigative activities and compliance checks to reduce illegal sales of cigarettes and tobacco products to minors and youth. {2} Six million dollars {$6~000~000} annually to the board to be used to enforce laws that regulate the distribution and retail sale of cigarettes and other tobacco prodf.!Cts~ such as laws that prohibit cigarette and tobacco product smuggling~ counterfeiting~ selling untaxed cigarettes and other tobacco products~ and selling cigarettes and other tobacco products without a proper license. {3} Six million dollars {$6~000~000} annually to the California Department of Public Health to be used to support programs~ including~ but not limited to~ providing grants and contracts to local law enforcement agencies to provide training and funding for the enforcement of state and local laws related to the illegal sales of tobacco to minors~ increasing investigative activities~ and compliance checks~ and other appropriate activities to reduce illegal sales of tobacco products to minors including~ but not limited to~ the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement {STAKE) Act~ pursuant to Section 22952 of the Business and Professions Code. {4} Six million dollars {$6~000~000} annually to the California Attorney General to be used for activities including~ but not limited to~ enforcing laws that regulate the distri~ution and sale of cigarettes and other tobacco products~ such as laws that prohibit cigarette smuggling~ counterfeiting~ selling untaxed tobacco~ selling tobacco without a proper license and selling tobacco to minors~ and enforcing tobacco-related laws~ court judgments~ and settlements. (f) Not more than five percent {5%} of the funds received pursuant to this article shall be used by any state or local agency or department receiving such funds for administrative costs. (g) The California State Auditor shall promulgate regulations pursuant to the rulemaking provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act {Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340} of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code) to define administrative costs for purposes of this article. 18 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 425 Such regulations shall take into account the differing nature of the agencies or departments receiving funds. (h) The board shall determine beginning two years following the effective date of this act, and annually thereafter, any reduction in revenues, following the first year after the effective date of this act, resulting from a reduction in the consumption of cigarettes and tobacco products due to .the additional taxes imposed on cigarettes by this article, and the increase in the tax on tobacco products required by subdivision (b) of Section 30123. If the board determines there has been a reduction in revenues, the amount of funds allocated pursuant to subdivisions (c), (d) · and (e) of this section shall be reduced proportionately. § 30130.58. Statutory References Unless otherwise stated, all references in this act refer to statutes as they existed on January 1, 2016. SECTION 5. Conforming Amendments to the Revenue and Taxation Code Section 30014 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read: 30014. (a) "Transporter" means any person transporting into or within this state any of the following: (1) Cigarettes not contained in packages to which are affixed California cigarette tax stamps or meter impressions. · (2) Tobacco products upon which the tobacco products surtax imposed by Article 2 (commencing with Section 30121)., Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 30130.50} and Article 3 (commencing with Section 30131) of Chapter 2 has not been paid. (b) "Transporter" shall not inClude any of the following: ( 1) A licensed distributor. 19 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 426 {2) A common carrier. {3) A person transporting cigarettes and tobacco products under federal internal revenue bond or customs control that are non-tax- paid under Chapter 52 of the Internal Revenue Act of 1954 as amended. Section 30104 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read: 30104. The taxes imposed by this part shall not apply to the sale of cigarettes or tobacco products by a distributor to a common carrier engaged in interstate or foreign passenger service or to a person authorized to sell cigarettes or tobacco products on the facilities of the carrier. Whenever cigarettes or tobacco products are sold by distributors to common carriers engaged in interstate or foreign passenger service for use or sale on facilities of the carriers, or to persons authorized to sell cigarettes-or tobacco products on those facilities, the tax imposed by Sections 30101, 30123, and 30131.2 under this part shall not be levied with respect to the sales of the cigarettes or tobacco products by the distributors, but a tax is hereby levied upon the carriers or upon the persons authorized to sell cigarettes or tobacco products on the facilities of the carriers, as the case may be, for the privilege of making sales in California at the same rate as set forth in Sections 30101, 30123, and 30131.2. under this part. Those common carriers and authorized persons shall pay the tax imposed by this section and file reports with the board, as provided in Section 30186. Section 30108 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read: 30108. (a) Every distributor engaged in business in this state and selling or accepting orders for cigarettes or tobacco products with respect to the sale of which the tax imposed by Sections 30101, 30123, and 30131.2 under this part is inapplicable shall, at the time of making the sale or accepting the order or, if the purchaser is not then obligated to pay the tax with respect to his or her distribution of the cigarettes or tobacco products, at the time the purchaser becomes so obligated, collect the tax from the purchaser, if the purchaser is other than a licensed distributor, and shall give to the purchaser a receipt therefor in the manner and 20 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 427 form prescribed by the board. (b) Every person engaged in business in this state and making gifts of untaxed cigarettes or tobacco products as samples with respect .to which the tax imposed by Sections 30101, 30123, and 30131.2 under this part is inapplicable shall, at the time of making the gift or, if the donee is not then obligated to pay the tax with respect to his or her distribution ofthe cigarettes or tobacco products, at the time the donee becomes so obligated, collect the tax from the donee, if the donee is other than a licensed distributor, and shall give the donee a receipt therefor in the manner and form prescribed by the board. This section shall not apply to those distributions of cigarettes or tobacco products which that are exempt from tax under Section 30105.5. (c) 11 Engaged in business in the state .. means and includes any of the following: (1) Maintaining, occupying, or using, permanently or temporarily, directly or indirectly, or through a subsidiary, or agent, by whatever name called, an office, place of distribution, sales or sample room or place, warehouse or storage place, or other place of business. (2) Having any representative, agent, salesperson, canvasser or solicitor operating in this state under the authority of the distributor or its subsidiary for the purpose of selling, delivering, or the taking of orders for cigarettes or tobacco products. (d) The taxes required to be collected by this section constitute debts owed by the distributor, or other person required to collect the taxes, to the state. Section 30166 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read: 30166. Stamps and meter register settings shall be sold to licensed distributors at their denominated values less a discount of0.85 percent, which shall be capped at the first one do//ar{$1.00} in denominated value-te licensed distributors. Payment for stamps or meter register settings shall 21 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 428 be made at the time of purchase, provided that a licensed distributor, subject to the conditions and provisions of this article, may be permitted to defer payments therefor. Section 30181 of the Revenue and Taxation Code is amended to read: 30181. (a) 'Nhen If any tax imposed upon cigarettes under Article 1 (commencing with Section 30101), Article 2 (commencing with Section 30121), and Article 3 (commencing\vith Section 30131) of Chapter 2 this part is not paid through the use of stamps or meter impressions, the tax shall be due and payable monthly on or before the 25th day of the month following the calendar month in which a distribution of cigarettes occurs, or in the case of a sale of cigarettes on the facilities of a common carrier for which the tax is imposed pursuant to Section 30104, the tax shall be due and payable monthly on or before the 25th day of the month following the calendar month in which a sale of cigarettes on the facilities of the carrier occurs. (b) Each distributor of tobacco products shall file a return in the form, as prescribed by the board, Vlhich that may include, but not be limited to, electronic media respecting the distributions of tobacco products and their wholesale cost during the preceding month, and any other information as the board may require to carry out this part. The return shall be filed with the board on or before the 25th day of the calendar month following the close of the monthly period for which it relates, together with a remittance payable to the board, of the amount of tax, if any, due under Article 2 (commencing with Section 30121) or Article 3 (commencing with Section 30131) of Chapter 2 for that period. (c) To facilitate the administration of this part, the board may require the filing of the returns for longer than monthly periods. (d) Returns shall be authenticated in a form or pursuant to methods as may be prescribed by the board. (e) This section shall become operative on January 1, 2007. SECTION 6. Conformity with State Constitution 22 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 429 Section 23 is added to Article XVI of the California Constitution.~ to read: SEC. 23 The tax imposed by the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCAR( RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 and the revenue derived therefrom.~ including investment interest.~ shall not be considered General Fund revenues for purposes of Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution and its implementing statutes.~ and shall not be considered uGeneral Fund revenues,.~.~ "state revenues.~.~.~ or "General Fund proceeds of · taxes.l.l for purposes of Section B(a) and (b) of Article XVI of the California Constitution and its implementing statutes. Section 14 is added to Article XIII B of the California Constitution.~ to read: SEC. 14. "Appropriations subject to limitation" of each entity of government shall not include appropriations of revenue from the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE.~ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund created by the CALIFORNIA HEAL THCARE.~ RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Act of 2016. No adjustment in the appropriations limit of any entity of government shall be required pursuant to Section 3 as a result of revenue being deposited in or appropriated from the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE.~ RE$EARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 Fund. SECTION 7. Severability If the provisions of this act, or part thereof, are for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining provisions shall not be affected, but shall remain in full force and effect and to this end the provisions of this act are severable. SECTION 8. Conflicting Measures (a) It is the intent of th~ people that in the event that this measure and another measure relating to the taxation of tobacco shall appear on the same statewide election ballot, the provisions of the other measure or measures shall not be deemed to be in conflict with this measure, and if approved by the voters, this measure shall take effect notwithstanding 23 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 430 approval by the voters of another measure relating to the taxation of tobacco by a greater number of affirmative votes. (b) If this measure is approved by the voters but superseded by law by any other conflicting ballot measure approved by the voters at the same election, and the conflicting measure is later held invalid, this measure shall be self-executing and given the full force of law. SECTION 9. Amendments (a) Except as hereafter provided, this act may only be amended by the electors as provided in subdivision (c) of Section 10' of Article II of the California Constitution. (b) The Legislature may amend subdivisions (a) and (c) of Section 30130.55 and Section 30130.57 of the Revenue and Taxation Code to further the purposes of the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 by a statute passed in each house by roll-call vote entered in the journal, two-thirds of the membership concurring. (c) The Legislature may amend subdivision (b) of Section 30130.55 of the Revenue and Taxation Code to further the purposes of the CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE, RESEARCH AND PREVENTION TOBACCO TAX ACT OF 2016 by a statute passed in each house by roll-call vote entered in the journal, four- fifths of the membership concurring. SECTION 10. Effective Date This act shall become effective as provided in Section 10(a) of Article II of the California Constitution; provided, however, the amendment to section 30121 of the Revenue and Taxation Code shall become effective April1, 2017. 24 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 431 Preprinted Logo will go here November 30, 2015 Hon. Kamala D. Harris Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Attention: Ms. Ashley Johansson Initiative Coordinator Dear Attorney General Harris: Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9005, we have reviewed the proposed constitutional and statutory initiative (A.G. File No. 15-0081, Amendment #1) that would increase the state’s cigarette excise tax from 87 cents to $2.87 per pack and apply the tobacco products excise tax to electronic cigarettes. BACKGROUND Tobacco Products and Electronic Cigarettes Tobacco products are derived from tobacco plants, contain nicotine, and are intended for human consumption, such as cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. Electronic cigarettes are battery- operated products that are generally designed to deliver nicotine, flavor, and other chemicals. These devices turn chemicals, including nicotine, into an aerosol that is inhaled by the user. Some types of electronic cigarettes are sold together with those chemicals, while others are sold separately. (There are also some electronic cigarettes that produce aerosols that do not contain nicotine.) Tobacco and Electronic Cigarette Taxes Tobacco products are subject to state and federal excise taxes, and state and local sales and use taxes. In contrast, electronic cigarettes are currently not subject to state and federal excise taxes but are subject to state and local sales and use taxes. Existing State Excise Taxes on Tobacco Products. Current state law imposes excise taxes on the distribution of cigarettes and other tobacco products, such as cigars and chewing tobacco. Tobacco excise taxes are paid by distributors who supply cigarettes and other tobacco products to retail stores. These taxes are typically passed on to consumers as higher prices on cigarettes and other tobacco products. The state’s cigarette excise tax is currently 87 cents per pack. Figure 1 describes the different components of the per-pack tax. As the figure shows, two voter-approved measures— AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 432 Hon. Kamala D. Harris 2 November 30, 2015 Proposition 99 in 1988 and Proposition 10 in 1998—are responsible for generating the vast majority of tobacco excise tax revenues. As the figure indicates, total state revenues from existing excise taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products were just under $840 million in 2014-15. Revenues from existing excise taxes on other tobacco products support Proposition 10 and Proposition 99 purposes. Under current law, any increase in cigarette taxes automatically triggers an equivalent increase in excise taxes on other tobacco products, with the latter revenues going to support Proposition 99 purposes. Existing Federal Excise Tax on Tobacco Products. The federal government imposes an excise tax on cigarettes and other tobacco products. In 2009, this tax was increased by 62 cents per pack (to a total of $1.01 per pack) to help fund the Children’s Health Insurance Program, which provides subsidized health insurance coverage to children in low-income families. Existing State and Local Sales and Use Taxes on Tobacco Products and Electronic Cigarettes. Sales of cigarettes, other tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes are subject to state and local sales and use taxes. These taxes are imposed on the retail price of a product, which includes excise taxes that have generally been passed along from distributors. The average retail price of a pack of cigarettes in California currently is close to $6. Roughly $400 million in annual revenue from sales and use taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products go to the state and local governments. State and Local Health Programs Department of Health Care Services (DHCS). The DHCS administers the Medicaid program, known as the California Medical Assistance Program (Medi-Cal) in California. Medi- Cal is a joint federal-state program that provides health care services to qualified low-income AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 433 Hon. Kamala D. Harris 3 November 30, 2015 persons. Currently, Medi-Cal provides health care services to over 12 million people, with a General Fund budget estimated at $18 billion for 2015-16. Federal law establishes some minimum requirements for state Medicaid programs regarding the types of services offered and who is eligible to receive them. Required services include hospital inpatient and outpatient care, skilled nursing care, and doctor visits. In addition, California offers an array of services considered optional under federal law, such as coverage of prescription drugs and durable medical equipment. While Medi-Cal is by far the largest healthcare program that DHCS administers in terms of both funding level and persons served, the department also administers a few other programs that provide health care services. Department of Public Health (DPH). The DPH administers and oversees a wide variety of programs with the goal of optimizing the health and well-being of Californians. The department’s programs address a broad range of health issues, including tobacco-related diseases, maternal and child health, cancer and other chronic diseases, communicable disease control, and inspection of health facilities. Many public health programs and services are delivered at the local level, while the state provides funding, oversight, and overall strategic leadership for improving population health. The state also centrally administers certain public health programs, such as licensing and certification of health facilities. State Spending Limit The State Constitution contains various rules affecting the state budget, such as the state spending limit that has been in place since passage of Proposition 4 in 1979. The Constitution requires the state to issue taxpayer rebates if the state exceeds the spending limit. PROPOSAL This measure increases excise taxes on the distribution of cigarettes and other tobacco products. It also applies, for the first time, the tobacco products excise tax (as amended by the measure) to certain types of electronic cigarettes. The additional revenues would be used to increase funding for existing healthcare programs and services, tobacco-related prevention and cessation programs, law enforcement programs, medical research on tobacco-related diseases, and for other specified purposes. The major provisions of the measure are described below. New State Tobacco Taxes This measure increases—effective April 1, 2017—the existing state excise tax on cigarettes by $2 per pack. The total state excise tax, therefore, would be $2.87 per pack. This measure also creates a one-time “floor tax” on cigarettes that are stored by businesses at the time the new excise tax is levied. Floor taxes are typically used to prevent businesses from avoiding taxes by stockpiling products before a tax goes into effect. As described above, any increase in cigarette taxes automatically triggers an equivalent increase in excise taxes on other tobacco products. As a result, the $2 per pack cigarette tax increase would lead to an equivalent increase in the tax rate on other tobacco products, which is currently equivalent to a $1.37 per pack tax on cigarettes. The new tax rate on other tobacco products would be equivalent to a $3.37 per pack tax on cigarettes. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 434 Hon. Kamala D. Harris 4 November 30, 2015 Tax on Electronic Cigarettes This measure also applies the tobacco products excise tax to electronic cigarettes that contain nicotine or are sold with liquid containing nicotine (hereafter referred to as “e-cigarettes”). As with other tobacco products, the tax rate would be equivalent to $3.37 per pack of cigarettes. The equivalent of 87 cents per pack would support Proposition 99 purposes, the equivalent of 50 cents per pack would support Proposition 10 purposes and the equivalent of $2 per pack would support the purposes of this measure. How Revenues From New Tobacco and E-Cigarette Taxes Would Be Spent Revenues from the cigarette, other tobacco product, and e-cigarette excise taxes that are increased by this measure would be deposited directly into a new special fund, called the California Healthcare, Research and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016 Fund (hereafter referred to as the fund). Revenues deposited in the fund would only be used for purposes set forth in the measure and would not be subject to appropriation by the Legislature. Here we describe how the revenues would be spent in the order required by the measure. (Revenues from expanding the taxpaying base of existing taxes to include e-cigarettes would support Proposition 99 and Proposition 10 purposes as described in Figure 1.) Backfill of Existing Tobacco Tax Programs. This measure requires the transfer of some revenues raised by the new taxes to “backfill,” or offset, any revenue losses that occur to funds supported by existing state cigarette and tobacco taxes as a direct result of the imposition of the new taxes. These revenue losses would occur mainly because an increase in the price of cigarettes and other tobacco products generally reduces consumption and leads some consumers to acquire untaxed products instead of taxed ones. This, in turn, would reduce the amount of revenues collected through the existing state excise taxes described above. The amount of backfill payments needed to offset any loss of funding in these areas would be determined by the Board of Equalization (BOE). Backfill of State and Local Sales and Use Tax Revenue Losses. Similarly, the measure requires backfill payments to the state and affected local governments in respect of any revenue losses of state and local sales and use taxes resulting directly from the new taxes on cigarettes and tobacco products. BOE Would Receive Up to 5 Percent of Remaining Funds for Administrative Costs. The BOE would receive not more than 5 percent of the funds remaining after backfill of existing tobacco programs to cover administrative expenses resulting from the new tax. (The BOE would also receive additional funds for enforcement of the new tax as explained below.) Specified State Entities Would Receive Predetermined Amounts. After backfilling for specified revenue losses due to the imposition of the new taxes and providing funds to BOE for administrative costs, the University of California (UC), California Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of the Attorney General (OAG), BOE, and DPH would annually receive predetermined amounts of funding as follows:  UC Would Receive $40 Million for Physician Training. Forty million dollars would be used to provide funding to UC for the purpose of increasing the number of primary AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 435 Hon. Kamala D. Harris 5 November 30, 2015 care and emergency physicians trained in California. The UC provides instruction to about 8,000 graduate medical students at six of its campuses. In addition, the university operates five teaching hospitals that support clinical teaching programs.  DPH Would Receive $30 Million for Dental Program. Thirty million dollars would be provided to the DPH State Dental Program for the purpose of educating about, preventing, and treating dental disease. The funds shall be used for activities including, but not limited to, education, disease prevention, disease treatment, surveillance, and case management.  DOJ and OAG Would Receive $30 Million for Local Law Enforcement. Thirty million dollars would be provided to the DOJ and the OAG to, in turn, distribute to local law enforcement agencies. The funds would be used to support and hire law enforcement officers for programs including, but not limited to, enforcement of state and local laws related to the illegal sales and marketing of tobacco to minors, increasing investigative activities, and compliance checks to reduce illegal sales of tobacco products to minors and youth tobacco use.  OAG Would Receive $6 Million to Enforce Tobacco Laws. Six million dollars would be provided to the OAG for activities including, but not limited to, enforcing laws that regulate the distribution and sale of cigarettes and other tobacco products.  DPH Would Receive $6 Million for Tobacco Enforcement Programs. Six million dollars would be provided to DPH to support programs, including, but not limited to, providing grants and contracts to local law enforcement agencies to provide training and funding for the enforcement of state and local laws related to the illegal sales of tobacco to minors, increasing investigative activities and compliance checks, and other activities to reduce the illegal sales of tobacco to minors.  BOE Would Receive $6 Million for Enforcement. Six million dollars would be provided to the BOE for enforcement of laws that regulate the distribution and retail sale of cigarettes and other tobacco products. The BOE administers a variety of tax programs, including sales and use taxes, property taxes, and special taxes, such as those on cigarettes and other tobacco products. Predetermined Amounts Would Be Adjusted to Reflect Revenues. If the BOE determines that there has been a reduction in revenues resulting from a reduction in the consumption of cigarette and tobacco products due to the measure, the predetermined amounts of funding described above would be adjusted proportionately. The BOE would make such determinations annually beginning two years after the measure went into effect. Remaining Funds Go to State Health Programs. After backfilling for specified revenue losses, paying BOE administrative costs, and distributing predetermined amounts of funding to specified state entities, the following state agencies would receive the remaining funds for health programs:  Medi-Cal in DHCS. Eighty-two percent of the remaining funds would be allocated to DHCS to provide funding to increase the level of payment for health care, services, AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 436 Hon. Kamala D. Harris 6 November 30, 2015 and treatment provided to Medi-Cal beneficiaries. Examples of health care, services, and treatment would include physician visits, hospital care, and prescription drugs. While this measure requires DHCS to use revenues from this measure to supplement, not supplant, existing state funding for Medi-Cal, it is unclear how this requirement would be interpreted and enforced.  California Tobacco Control Program (CTCP) in DPH. About 11 percent of the remaining funds would fund tobacco prevention and control programs administered by CTCP. The DPH administers the CTCP with the aim of reducing illness and death from tobacco-related diseases. The CTCP, with a budget estimated at $38 million in 2014-15, funds programs aimed at countering pro-tobacco messages, reducing secondhand smoke exposure, reducing access to tobacco products, and increasing smoking cessation services.  California Department of Education (CDE). About 2 percent of the remaining funds would be provided to CDE for school programs to prevent and reduce the use of tobacco products by young people. The department administers various education programs, and allocates funding to various types of local education agencies, including county offices of education, school districts, and charter schools. The CDE’s budget for tobacco education and prevention programs is estimated at $16 million for 2014-15, with the funding for these programs coming from Proposition 99.  Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program Administered by UC. Five percent of the remaining funds would be allocated to the Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program administered by UC for medical research into prevention, early detection, treatments, and potential cures of all types of cancer, cardiovascular and lung disease, and other tobacco-related diseases. Currently funded with Proposition 99 tobacco tax revenues, this research program supports research on the prevention and treatment of tobacco-related diseases in California by awarding grant funding to researchers at California public, private, and nonprofit entities, such as universities, hospitals, laboratories, local health departments, and managed care organizations. Administrative Costs Limited to 5 Percent. The measure would limit the amount of revenues raised by the measure that could be used to pay for administrative costs. Entities receiving funds would be allowed to use not more than 5 percent of the funds for administrative costs. Other Major Provisions California State Auditor. The California State Auditor would conduct audits of agencies receiving funds from the new taxes at least every other year. The Auditor would receive up to $400,000 annually to cover costs incurred from conducting these audits. The Auditor provides independent and nonpartisan assessments of the California government’s financial and operational activities in compliance with generally accepted government accounting standards. Revenues From Measure Would Be Exempt From State Spending Limit. The measure would amend the State Constitution to exempt the measure's revenues and spending from the AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 437 Hon. Kamala D. Harris 7 November 30, 2015 state's constitutional spending limit. (This constitutional exemption is similar to ones already in place for prior, voter-approved increases in tobacco taxes.) FISCAL EFFECTS This measure would have a number of fiscal effects on state and local governments. The major impacts are discussed below. Impacts on State and Local Revenues Revenues Would Be Affected by Consumer Response. Our revenue estimates assume that the proposed excise tax increases would be passed along to consumers. In other words, we assume that the retail prices of cigarettes, other tobacco products, and e-cigarettes would be raised to include the excise tax increase. We expect consumers to respond to this price increase in two ways: by reducing their consumption of cigarettes, other tobacco products, and e-cigarettes and by changing the way they acquire cigarettes, other tobacco products, and e-cigarettes so that fewer transactions are taxed. For example, consumers could avoid paying the new tax on e-cigarettes by purchasing untaxed e-cigarettes from Internet vendors. Revenues From New Excise Taxes. We estimate that the new excise taxes on cigarettes and other tobacco products (including e-cigarettes) required by this measure would raise an estimated $1.3 billion to $1.6 billion in annual revenue. The range reflects the uncertainty of the magnitude of the consumer response to the proposed tax increase discussed above. Our estimate of the allocation of new excise tax revenues in 2017-18 (the first full-year impact) is shown in Figure 2. After backfilling losses in existing tax revenue (described in more detail below), the new cigarette excise tax would generate an estimated $1 billion to $1.4 billion in net revenue in 2017-18 for the purposes described in the measure. (These estimates do not include additional revenue from the provision of the measure that expands the taxpaying base of existing excise taxes to include e-cigarettes, which we discuss below. They also do not include revenue from the one-time floor stock tax.) The excise tax increases would generate somewhat lower amounts of revenue in subsequent years, based on our projections of continued declines in cigarette consumption. Effects on Revenues From Existing Excise Taxes. The classification of certain e-cigarettes as a tobacco product would expand the set of products subject to the existing excise tax on other tobacco products. As a result, it would generate additional revenue for the Proposition 99 and Proposition 10 purposes described earlier in Figure 1. In 2017-18, excise taxes on e-cigarettes could generate revenue ranging from tens of millions of dollars to over $100 million for Proposition 99 purposes and an amount in the low-to-mid tens of millions of dollars for Proposition 10 purposes. The decline in consumption of cigarettes and other tobacco products caused by this measure would reduce revenues from the existing excise taxes that go to support Proposition 99 and Proposition 10 purposes, the General Fund, and the Breast Cancer Fund. The measure provides for the backfill of these losses from revenues raised by the new excise taxes. We estimate that the amount of backfill funding needed to comply with this requirement would range from $200 million to $230 million in 2017-18. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 438 Hon. Kamala D. Harris 8 November 30, 2015 Effect on State and Local Sales and Use Tax Revenues. Sales and use taxes are levied on a variety of products, including the retail price of cigarettes, other tobacco products, and e-cigarettes. The retail price usually includes the cost of all excise taxes. The excise tax increases under the measure would raise the retail price of taxable cigarettes, tobacco products, and e-cigarettes, and consumers would respond by buying fewer of those goods. As a result, the effect of the measure’s tax increases on sales and use tax revenue from the sale of cigarettes, tobacco products, and e-cigarettes could be positive or negative, depending on the magnitude of the consumer response. For cigarettes and tobacco products, the measure provides for the backfill of sales and use tax revenue losses from revenues raised by the new excise taxes. We estimate this provision is not likely to be used. Effects on Excise Tax Collection. As discussed above, the measure would allocate $48 million to the DOJ, OAG, DPH, and BOE to support state law enforcement efforts. These funds would be used to support increased enforcement efforts to reduce tax evasion, counterfeiting, smuggling, and the unlicensed sales of cigarettes and other tobacco products. The funds would also be used to support efforts to reduce sales of tobacco products to minors. These activities could bring in more excise tax revenue, but the magnitude of this effect is uncertain. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 439 Hon. Kamala D. Harris 9 November 30, 2015 Impact on State and Local Government Health Care Costs The state and local governments in California incur costs for providing (1) health care for low-income and uninsured persons and (2) health insurance coverage for state and local government employees and retirees. Consequently, changes in state law such as those made by this measure that affect the health of the general population—and low-income and uninsured persons and public employees in particular—would affect publicly funded health care costs. For example, as discussed above, this measure would result in a decrease in the consumption of tobacco products as a result of the expected price increase of tobacco products. Further, this measure provides funding for tobacco prevention and cessation programs, and to the extent these programs are effective, this would further decrease consumption of tobacco products. The use of tobacco products has been linked to various adverse health effects by the federal health authorities and numerous scientific studies. Thus, this measure would reduce state and local government health care spending on tobacco-related diseases over the long term. This measure would have other fiscal effects that offset these cost savings. For example, health care and social services that otherwise would not have occurred as a result of individuals who avoid tobacco- related diseases living longer. Further, the impact of a tax on e-cigarettes on health and the associated costs over the long term is unknown, because e-cigarettes are relatively new devices and the health impacts of e-cigarettes are still being studied. Thus, the net long-term fiscal impact of this measure on state and local government costs is unknown. Potential Other Effects on State General Fund Resulting From Increases in Health Care Provider Reimbursement. As noted above, a portion of the funds from this measure are to be used to increase the level of payment for health care providers that provide services to individuals enrolled in Medi-Cal. Currently, certain types of Medi-Cal providers, such as managed care plans, typically receive rate increases that account for such things as medical inflation and changes in the amount and types of health care services provided to enrollees. These rate increases are partially funded with state General Fund monies. In addition, absent the measure, there may be some pressure for the state to increase payment to other types of Medi- Cal providers to ensure beneficiaries have adequate access to health care services. To the extent funds generated by the measure are used to increase provider payments that would otherwise have been covered by the General Fund, the measure would reduce state General Fund costs. On the other hand, higher provider payments created by the measure could establish an expectation that similar payment levels will be maintained in future years. The funds generated from this measure are expected to decline over time as cigarette consumption decreases and fewer cigarettes are purchased. To the extent the measure would create pressure to maintain the level of provider payments initially achieved by this measure, it could create pressure to use state General Fund monies to backfill the expected decline in funds available from this measure. The net fiscal effect of these two potential impacts of the measure cannot be estimated. Summary of Fiscal Effects This measure would have the following major fiscal effects:  Net increase in excise tax revenues in the range of $1.1 billion to $1.6 billion annually by 2017-18, with revenues decreasing slightly in subsequent years. The AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 440 Hon. Kamala D. Harris 10 November 30, 2015 majority of funds would be used for payments to health care providers. The remaining funds would be used for a variety of specified purposes, including tobacco-related prevention and cessation programs, law enforcement programs, medical research on tobacco-related diseases, and early childhood development programs. Sincerely, _____________________________ Mac Taylor Legislative Analyst _____________________________ Michael Cohen Director of Finance AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 441 RECOMMENDATION(S): CONSIDER adopting a Support position on Proposition 54 Legislative Proceedings Initiative, which seeks to prohibit the Legislature from passing any bill unless it has been in print and published on the Internet for at least 72 hours before the vote, except in cases of public emergency, as recommended by the Legislation Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: No direct impact to the County from supporting the initiative. However, if implemented, the measure would increase costs to state government of potentially $1 million to $2 million initially and about $1 million annually for making additional legislative proceedings available in audiovisual form on the Internet. BACKGROUND: Background Legislative Rules. The State Legislature has two houses: the State Assembly and the State Senate. The California Constitution governs the various ways in which the Legislature can pass bills. It does not include a requirement on the amount of time a bill needs to be available on the Internet before a vote by either house. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: L. DeLaney, 925-335-1097 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: June McHuen, Deputy cc: C. 27 To:Board of Supervisors From:LEGISLATION COMMITTEE Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Support Proposition 54 Legislative Proceedings Initiative AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 442 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Public Proceedings. The Constitution requires the proceedings of each house to be open and public, with some exceptions. These public proceedings include floor sessions and committee hearings, some of which occur outside of the State Capitol. Both the Senate and Assembly make audio or audiovisual recordings of most, but not all, of these proceedings available to the public online. The legislative branch spends around $1 million annually on these activities. Current law prohibits Assembly recordings from being used for political and commercial purposes. Legislature’s Budget. Proposition 140 (1990) established a cap on annual spending by the Legislature. The cap is adjusted each year for changes in per capita personal income and population. Proposal The measure makes three changes to Legislative rules and responsibilities. First, the measure requires the Legislature to ensure audiovisual recordings of all public proceedings are publicly accessible on the Internet within 24 hours and archived for at least 20 years thereafter. Second, the measure prohibits the Legislature from voting on a bill until it has been published online in its final form for at least 72 hours. This prohibition includes exceptions for emergencies, such as natural disasters. Third, the measure allows the recordings of public proceedings to be used for any legitimate purpose. Fiscal Effects The measure’s primary fiscal impact relates to the requirement that the Legislature provide audiovisual recordings of all proceedings. The amount of added costs would depend on how the Legislature implemented the measure. The state, however, could face: (1) one-time costs of $1 million to $2 million to purchase cameras and other equipment and (2) ongoing costs of about $1 million annually for additional staff and storage for an archive of the recordings. The Legislature’s costs of complying with the measure would come out of their annual spending allocation. Summary of Fiscal Effects. The measure would have the following fiscal effect: Increased costs to state government of potentially $1 million to $2 million initially and about $1 million annually for making additional legislative proceedings available in audiovisual form on the Internet. See Attachment A for the full text of the measure and Attachment B for the full report by the Legislative Analyst's Office. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: There would be no record of the County's support for the ballot initiative. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Proposition 54 Legislative Proceedings Initiative Attachment B: Legislative Analyst's Office report AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 443 1 5 -0 0 8 3 Amdt.# I Hold Politicians Accountable Initiative Coordinator Office of the Attorney General State of California PO Box 994255 Sacramento, CA 94244-25550 November 16, 2015 Re: Amendments: Proposed Initiative 15-0083 Dear Initiative Coordinator: El NOV 1 6 2015 IN!T!ATIVE ATTORNEY In accordance with subdivision (b) of Section 9002 of the Elections Code and in connection with the proposed statewide ballot measure ("California Legislature Transparency Act") filed with your office on October 12, 2015, the undersigned proponents submit the enclosed amended text. Please proceed to prepare the Circulating Title and Summary, in light of these amendments. Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter. SUBMITTED BY: CHARLES T. MUNGER, JR. SAM BLAKESLEE Enclosures AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 444 Hold Politicians Accountable Initiative Coordinator Office of the Attorney General State of California PO Box 994255 Sacramento, CA 94244-25550 November 16, 2015 Re: Amendments: Proposed Initiative 15-0083 Dear Initiative Coordinator: In accordance with subdivision (b) of Section 9002 of the Elections Code and in connection with the proposed statewide ballot measure ("California Legislature Transparency Act") filed with your office on October 12, 2015, the undersigned proponents submit the enclosed amended text. Please proceed to prepare the Circulating Title and Summary, in light of tl1ese amendments. Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter. SUBMITTED BY: CHARLES T. MUNGER, JR. Enclosures AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 445 1 5 -o o a 3 Arnett.# I Initiative Measure to Be Submitted Directly to the Voters SECTION 1. Title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the California Legislature Transparency Act. SECTION 2. Findings and Declarations. The People of the State of California hereby find and declare that: a. It is essential to the maintenance of a democratic society that public business be performed in an open and public manner, and highly desirable that citizens be given the opportunity to fully review every bill and express their views regarding the bill's merits to their elected representatives, before it is passed. b. However, last-minute amendments to bills are frequently used to push through political favors without comment or with little advance notice. c. Moreover, complex bills are often passed before members of the Legislature have any realistic opportunity to review or debate them, resulting in ill-considered legislation. d. Further, although our Constitution currently provides that the proceedings of each house and the committees thereof shall be open and public, few citizens have the ability to attend legislative proceedings in person, and many legislative proceedings go completely unobserved by the public and press, often leaving no record of what was said. e. Yet, with the availability of modem recording technology and the Internet, there is no reason why public legislative proceedings should remain relatively inaccessible to the citizens that they serve. f. Accordingly, to foster disclosure, deliberation, debate, and decorum in our legislative proceedings, to keep our citizens fully informed, and to ensure that legislative proceedings are conducted fairly and openly, our Constitution should guarantee the right of all persons, including members of the press, to freely record legislative proceedings and to broadcast, post, or otherwise transmit those recordings. g. To supplement this right to record legislative proceedings, the Legislature itself should also be required to make and post audiovisual recordings of all public proceedings to the Internet and to maintain an archive of these recordings, which will be a valuable resource for the public, the press, and the academic community for generations to come. h. California should also follow the lead of other states that require a 72-hour advance notice period between the time a bill is printed and made available to the public and the time it is put to a vote, allowing an exception only in the case of a true emergency, such as a natural disaster. 1. The opportunity for an orderly and detailed review of bills by the public, the press, and legislators will result in better bills while thwarting political favoritism and power grabs. J. These measures will have nominal cost to taxpayers, while promoting greater transparency in our legislative proceedings to benefit the People. SECTION 3. Statement of Purpose. In enacting this measure, the People of the State of California intend the following: a. To enable we, the People, to observe through the Internet what is happening and has happened in any and all of the Legislature's public proceedings so as to obtain the information necessary to participate in the political process and to hold our elected representatives accountable for their actions. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 446 b. To enable we, the People, to record and to post or otherwise transmit our own recordings of those legislative proceedings in order to encourage fairness in the proceedings, deliberation in our representatives' decision-making, and accountability. c. To give us, the People, and our representatives the necessary time to carefully evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the final version of a bill before a vote by imposing a 72- hour public notice period between the time that the final version is made available to the Legislature and the public, and the time that a vote is taken, except in cases of a true emergency declared by the Governor. SECTION 4. Amendments to Article IV of the California Constitution. Section 4.1. Section 7 of Article IV of the Constitution is amended to read: SEC. 7. (a) Each house shall choose its officers and adopt rules for its proceedings. A majority of the membership constitutes a quorum, but a smaller number may recess from day to day and compel the attendance of absent members. (b) Each house shall keep and publish a journal of its proceedings. The rollcall vote of the members on a question shall be taken and entered in the journal at the request of 3 members present. ( c) ( 1) Except as provided in paragraph (3 ), +the proceedings of each house and the committees thereof shall be open and public. The right to attend open and public proceedings includes the right of any person to record by audio or video means any and all parts of the proceedings and to broadcast or otherwise transmit them; provided that the Legislature may adopt reasonable rules pursuant to paragraph (5) regulating the placement and use of the equipment for recording or broadcasting the proceedings for the sole purpose of minimizing disruption of the proceedings. Any aggrieved party shall have standing to challenge said rules in an action for declaratory and injunctive relief, and the Legislature shall have the burden of demonstrating that the rule is reasonable. (2) Commencing on January 1 of the second calendar year following the adoption of this paragraph, the Legislature shall also cause audiovisual recordings to be made of all proceedings subject to paragraph (1) in their entirety, shall make such recordings public through the Internet within 24 hours after the proceedings have been recessed or adjourned for the day, and shall maintain an archive of said recordings, which shall be accessible to the public through the Internet and downloadable for a period of no less than 20 years as specified by statute. (3) Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (2)Hov,zever, closed sessions may be held solely for any of the following purposes: (A) To consider the appointment, employment, evaluation of performance, or dismissal of a public officer or employee, to consider or hear complaints or charges brought against a Member of the Legislature or other public officer or employee, or to establish the classification or compensation of an employee of the Legislature. (B) To consider matters affecting the safety and security of Members of the Legislature or its employees or the safety and security of any buildings and grounds used by the Legislature. (C) To confer with, or receive advice from, its legal counsel regarding pending or reasonably anticipated, or whether to initiate, litigation when discussion in open session would not protect the interests of the house or committee regarding the litigation. 2 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 447 (1~) A caucus of the Members of the Senate, the Members of the Assembly, or the Members of both houses, which is composed of the members of the same political party, may meet in closed session. (~J) The Legislature shall implement this subdivision by concurrent resolution adopted by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two-thirds of the membership of each house concurring, or by statute, and shall presoribe that, when in the case of a closed session is-held pursuant to paragraph (l+), shall prescribe that reasonable notice of the closed session and the purpose of the closed session shall be provided to the public. If there is a conflict between a concurrent resolution and statute, the last adopted or enacted shall prevail. (d) Neither house without the consent of the other may recess for more than 10 days or to any other place. Section 4.2. Section 8 of Article IV of the Constitution is amended to read: SEC. 8. (a) At regular sessions no bill other than the budget bill may be heard or acted on by committee or either house until the 31st day after the bill is introduced unless the house dispenses with this requirement by rollcall vote entered in the journal, three fourths of the membership concurring. (b )ill The Legislature may make no law except by statute and may enact no statute except by bill. No bill may be passed unless it is read by title on 3 days in each house except that the house may dispense with this requirement by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two thirds of the membership concurring. @No bill may be passed or ultimately become a statute unless 'l:1fltil the bill with any amendments has been printed.,--8ft4-distributed to the members, and published on the Internet, in its final form, for at least 72 hours before the vote, except that this notice period may be waived if the Governor has submitted to the Legislature a written statement that dispensing with this notice period for that bill is necessary to address a state of emergency, as defined in paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 3 of Article XIII B, that has been declared by the Governor, and the house considering the bill thereafter dispenses with the notice period for that bill by a separate rollcall vote entered in the journal, two thirds of the membership concurring, prior to the vote on the bill. filNo bill may be passed unless, by rollcall vote entered in the journal, a majority of the membership of each house concurs. (c) (1) Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3) of this subdivision, a statute enacted at a regular session shall go into effect on January 1 next following a 90-day period from the date of enactment of the statute and a statute enacted at a special session shall go into effect on the 91 st day after adjournment of the special session at which the bill was passed. (2) A statute, other than a statute establishing or changing boundaries of any legislative, congressional, or other election district, enacted by a bill passed by the Legislature on or before the date the Legislature adjourns for a joint recess to reconvene in the second calendar year of the biennium of the legislative session, and in the possession of the Governor ·after that date, shall go into effect on January 1 next following the enactment date of the statute unless, before January 1, a copy of a referendum petition affecting the statute is submitted to the Attorney General pursuant to subdivision ( d) of Section 10 of Article II, in which event the statute shall go into effect on the 91 st day after the enactment date unless the petition has been presented to the Secretary of State pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 9 of Article II. 3 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 448 (3) Statutes calling elections, statutes providing for tax levies or appropriations for the usual current expenses of the State, and urgency statutes shall go into effect immediately upon their enactment. (d) Urgency statutes are those necessary for immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety. A statement of facts constituting the necessity shall be set forth in one section of the bill. In each house the section and the bill shall be passed separately, each by rollcall vote entered in the journal, two thirds of the membership concurring. An urgency statute may not create or abolish any office or change the salary, term, or duties of any office, or grant any franchise or special privilege, or create any vested right or interest. SECTION 5. Amendments of the Government Code Section 5.1. Section 9026.5 of the Government Code is amended to read as follows: 9026.5. Televised or other audiovisual recordings of public proceedingsTelevision signal of Assembly; prohibited use; violation (a) Televised or other audiovisual recordings of the public proceedings of each house of the Legislature and the committees thereof may be used for any legitimate purpose and without the imposition of any fee due to the State or any public agency or public corporation thereof. No television signal generated by the Assembly shall be used for any political or commercial purpose, including, but not limited to, any campaign for elective public office or any campaign supporting or opposing a ballot proposition submitted to the electors. As used in this section, "commercial purpose" does not include either of the follov,ring: ( 1) The use of any television signal generated by the A.ssembly by an accredited news organization or any nonprofit organization for educational or public affairs programming. (2) As authorized by the Assembly, the transmission by a third party to paid subscribers of an unedited video feed of the television signal generated by the Assembly. (b) The Legislature's costs of complying with paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 7 and of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 8 of Article IV of the California Constitution shall be included as part of the total aggregate expenditures allowed under Section 7.5 of Article IV of the California Constitution. Any person or organization vmo violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor. Section 5.2. Section 10248 of the Government Code is amended to read as follows: 10248. Public computer network; required legislative information (a) The Legislative Counsel shall, with the advice of the Assembly Committee on Rules and the Senate Committee on Rules, make all of the following information available to the public in electronic form: (1) The legislative calendar, the schedule of legislative committee hearings, a list of matters pending on the floors of both houses of the Legislature, and a list of the committees of the Legislature and their members. (2) The text of each bill introduced in each current legislative session, including each amended, enrolled, and chaptered form of each bill. (3) The bill history of each bill introduced and amended in each current legislative session. ( 4) The bill status of each bill introduced and amended in each current legislative session. 4 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 449 (5) All bill analyses prepared by legislative committees in connection with each bill in each current legislative session. (6) All audiovisual recordings of legislative proceedings that have been caused to be made by the Legislature in accordance with paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 7 of Article IV. Each recording shall remain accessible to the public through the Internet and downloadable for a minimum period of20 years following the date on which the recording was made and shall then be archived in a secure format. t6)(7) All vote information concerning each bill in each current legislative session. f'.B(8) Any veto message concerning a bill in each current legislative session. f81(9) The California Codes. f91(10) The California Constitution. fl-(B(l l) All statutes enacted on or after January 1, 1993. (b) The information identified in subdivision (a) shall be made available to the public by means of access by way of the largest nonproprietary, nonprofit cooperative public computer network. The information shall be made available in one or more formats and by one or more means in order to provide the greatest feasible access to the general public in this state. Any person who accesses the information may access all or any part of the information. The information may also be made available by any other means of access that would facilitate public access to the information. The information that is maintained in the legislative information system that is operated and maintained by the Legislative Counsel shall be made available in the shortest feasible time after the information is available in the information system. The information that is not maintained in the information system shall be made available in the shortest feasible time after it is available to the Legislative Counsel. ( c) Any documentation that describes the electronic digital formats of the information identified in subdivision (a) and is available to the public shall be made available by means of access by way of the computer network specified in subdivision (b ). ( d) Personal information concerning a person who accesses the information may be maintained only for the purpose of providing service to the person. (e) No fee or other charge may be imposed by the Legislative Counsel as a condition of accessing the information that is accessible by way of the computer network specified in subdivision (b ). (f) The electronic public access provided by way of the computer network specified in subdivision (b) shall be in addition to other electronic or print distribution of the information. (g) No action taken pursuant to this section shall be deemed to alter or relinquish any copyright or other proprietary interest or entitlement of the State of California relating to any of the information made available pursuant to this section. SECTION 6. Defense of Initiative Measure. Section 6.1. Section 12511.5 is added to the Government Code to read as follows: Section 12511.5. Defense of the California Legislature Transparency Act If an action is brought challenging, in whole or in part, the validity of the California Legislature Transparency Act, the following shall apply: (a) The Legislature shall continue to comply with the act unless it is declared unconstitutional pursuant to a final judgment of an appellate court. 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 450 (b) Except as set forth in subdivision (c), the Attorney General shall defend against any action challenging, in whole or in part, the validity of the act, and shall have an unconditional right to intervene in any action addressing the validity of the act. ( c) If the Attorney General declines to defend the validity of the act in any action, the Attorney General shall nonetheless file an appeal from, or seek review of, any judgment of any court that determines that the act is invalid, in whole or in part, if necessary or appropriate to preserve the State's standing to defend the law in conformity with the Attorney General's constitutional duty to see that the laws of the State are adequately enforced. (d) The official proponents of the act have an unconditional right to participate, either as interveners or real parties in interest, in any action affecting the validity or interpretation of the act. Where the Governor and Attorney General have declined to defend the validity of the act, the official proponents are also authorized to act on the State's behalf in asserting the State's interest in the validity of the act in any such action and to appeal from any judgment invalidating the act. (e) Nothing in this section precludes other public officials from asserting the State's interest in the validity of the act. SECTION 7. Repeal of any Conflicting Statute Proposed at the Primary Election. If the Legislature places a measure on the ballot for the June 2016 primary election that is approved by a majority of votes thereon, any provision of that measure that is inconsistent with, or interferes in any way with, the purpose or provisions adopted by this initiative measure shall be rendered void and without legal effect. SECTION 8. Severability. The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held to be invalid, that invalidity shall not affect the other provisions or applications that can be given effect in the absence of the invalid provision or application. Without limiting in any way the generality of the foregoing, the voters declare (1) that the amendments to Section 7 of Article IV of the California Constitution are severable from the amendments to Section 8 of Article IV of the California Constitution, (2) that the Legislature's obligations to cause to be made, to make public, and to maintain audiovisual recordings of legislative proceedings are severable from the right of any person to record the proceedings and broadcast or otherwise transmit such recordings pursuant to the amendments to Section 7 of Article IV, (3) that the right to record proceedings is severable from the right to broadcast or otherwise transmit the recordings, and ( 4) that the statutory amendments of this initiative measure are severable from the constitutional amendments. SECTION 9. Amendments. The statutory provisions of this act shall not be amended except upon approval of the voters, except that the Legislature may amend Government Code section 10248, subdivision (a)(6) to extend the time that recordings shall remain accessible to the public through the Internet and downloadable by passing a statute by a rollcall vote entered in the journal, a majority of the membership of each house concurring. 6 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 451 SECTION 10. Conflicting Ballot Propositions. (a) In the event that this initiative measure and any other measure or measures that relate to the transparency of the legislative process with respect to any of the matters addressed herein are approved by a majority of voters at the same election, and this initiative measure receives a greater number of affirmative votes than any other such measure or measures, this initiative measure shall control in its entirety and the other measure or measures shall be rendered void and without legal effect. (b) If this initiative measure and a statutory measure placed on the ballot by the Legislature are approved by a majority of voters at the same election, the constitutional amendments in this initiative measure shall control over any statutory measure placed on the ballot by the Legislature to the extent that the statutory measure conflicts with, is inconsistent with, or interferes with the purpose, intent, or provisions of this initiative measure. ( c) If this initiative measure is approved by voters but is superseded in whole or in part by any other conflicting measure approved by the voters and receiving a greater number of affirmative votes at the same election, and the conflicting measure or superseding provisions thereof are subsequently held to be invalid, the formerly superseded provisions of this initiative measure, to the extent superseded by the subsequently invalidated provisions of the conflicting measure, shall be self-executing and given the full force of law. 7 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 452 Preprinted Logo will go here December 1, 2015 Hon. Kamala D. Harris Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Attention: Ms. Ashley Johansson Initiative Coordinator Dear Attorney General Harris: Pursuant to Elections Code Section 9005, we have reviewed the proposed statutory and constitutional initiative related to legislative rules and responsibilities (A.G. File No. 15-0083, Amendment No. 1). Background Legislative Rules. The State Legislature has two houses: the State Assembly and the State Senate. The California Constitution governs the various ways in which the Legislature can pass bills. It does not include a requirement on the amount of time a bill needs to be available on the Internet before a vote by either house. Public Proceedings. The Constitution requires the proceedings of each house to be open and public, with some exceptions. These public proceedings include floor sessions and committee hearings, some of which occur outside of the State Capitol. Both the Senate and Assembly make audio or audiovisual recordings of most, but not all, of these proceedings available to the public online. The legislative branch spends around $1 million annually on these activities. Current law prohibits Assembly recordings from being used for political and commercial purposes. Legislature’s Budget. Proposition 140 (1990) established a cap on annual spending by the Legislature. The cap is adjusted each year for changes in per capita personal income and population. Proposal The measure makes three changes to Legislative rules and responsibilities. First, the measure requires the Legislature to ensure audiovisual recordings of all public proceedings are publicly accessible on the Internet within 24 hours and archived for at least 20 years thereafter. Second, the measure prohibits the Legislature from voting on a bill until it has been published online in its final form for at least 72 hours. This prohibition includes exceptions for emergencies, such as natural disasters. Third, the measure allows the recordings of public proceedings to be used for any legitimate purpose. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 453 Hon. Kamala D. Harris 2 December 1, 2015 Fiscal Effects The measure’s primary fiscal impact relates to the requirement that the Legislature provide audiovisual recordings of all proceedings. The amount of added costs would depend on how the Legislature implemented the measure. The state, however, could face: (1) one-time costs of $1 million to $2 million to purchase cameras and other equipment and (2) ongoing costs of about $1 million annually for additional staff and storage for an archive of the recordings. The Legislature’s costs of complying with the measure would come out of their annual spending allocation. Summary of Fiscal Effects. The measure would have the following fiscal effect:  Increased costs to state government of potentially $1 million to $2 million initially and about $1 million annually for making additional legislative proceedings available in audiovisual form on the Internet. Sincerely, _____________________________ Mac Taylor Legislative Analyst _____________________________ Michael Cohen Director of Finance AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 454 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21886 to add one (1) Clerk – Senior Level (JWXC) (represented) position at salary plan and grade 3RX 1033 ($3,210 - $4,100) and one (1) Victim/Witness Assistance Program Specialist (65SA) (represented) position at salary plan and grade QV5 1191 ($3,619 - $4,399) in the District Attorney's office. FISCAL IMPACT: $154,500, 100% State. BACKGROUND: The Victim/Witness Program provides constitutionally mandated direct services under Marsy's Law to victims and witnesses of crime, and establishes and maintains working relationships with law enforcement agencies and community based organizations. The Program Specialist would be assigned to a Family Justice Center. This funding allows the office to support its FJC partners at the level that was initially envisioned. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cherie Mathisen, 925-957-2234 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: Cherie Mathisen C. 29 To:Board of Supervisors From:Mark Peterson, District Attorney Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one Clerk - Senior Level position and one V/W Assist. Prog. Spec. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 455 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The advocate will provide direct services to all victims of sexual assault, domestic violence, elder abuse and human trafficking, and support all agencies in the collaborative assistance of victims of crime and their families. As contemplated by the Victim/Witness Assistance Grant augmented funding, additional clerical support is needed to support the mission of the Program. The Program has grown from 5 advocates to 15 advocates in the past three years; numbers which do not include the staff in this request. A Senior Level Clerk will provide direct support to victims of crime with information and guidance pursuant to Marsy's Law, and also support the Program Manager, Lead Clerk and Program Specialists. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The California Governor's Office of Emergency Services Criminal Justice/Emergency Management and Victim Services Branch has provided additional grant funding that will allow the District Attorney's office to increase staffing to better serve the Contra Costa Community. If this action is not approved, the Victim Witness Program Manager would not have the necessary clerical support in the Victim / Witness Program unit and no Program Specialist support assigned to the Family Justice Center and partners. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No Impact. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21886 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS P300 #21886 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 456 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21886 DATE 3/1/2016 Department No./ Department District Attorney Budget Unit No. 0242 Org No. 2841 Agency No. 42 Action Requested: ADD One (1) Victim/Witness Assistance Program Specialist (65SA) (represented) position at salary level QV5 1191 and one (1) Clerk - Senior Level (JWXC) (represented) at salary level 3RX 1033 to the District Attorney's office Victim/Witness Unit. Proposed Effective Date: 7/13/2016 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $154,500.00 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $141,625.00 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT 100% Victim/Witness grant funds Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Mark A. Peterson ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Timothy M. Ewell 7/15/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 7/20/2016 Add one (1) Clerk – Senior Level (JWXC) (represented) position at salary plan and grade 3RX 1033 ($3,210 - $4,100) in the Victim/Witness Program and one (1) Victim/Witness Assistance Program Specialist (65SA) (represented) position at salary plan and grade QV5 1191 ($3,619 - $4,399). Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Amanda Monson 7/20/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 7/27/16 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Timothy M. Ewell (via Vana Tran) Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 457 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 7/27/2016 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 458 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES459 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment No. 21891 to add the following represented positions in the Health Services Department: two (2) full-time Exempt Medical Staff Physician (VPW9) at salary level 1P5-2312 ($11,052 - $14,864); two (2) full-time Family Nurse Practitioner (VWSB) at salary level L35-1873 ($9,249 - $11,242); one (1) full-time Charge Nurse (VWTF) at salary level L35-1883 ($9,341 - $10,298); one (1) full-time Registered Nurse-Advanced Level (VWXE) at salary level L32-1878 ($9,576 - $9,815); three (3) full-time Licensed Vocational Nurse (VT7G) at salary level TAX-1287 ($4,129 - $5,273); three (3) full-time Certified Medical Assistant (VTWC) at salary level TA5-1088 ($3,399 - $4,132); two (2) full-time Clerk-Senior Level (JWXC) at salary level 3RX-1033 ($3,210 - $4,100); one (1) part-time 32/40 Clerk-Senior Level (JWXC) at salary level 3RX-1033 ($3,210 - $4,100); one (1 full-time Community Health Worker II (VKVB) at salary level TC5-1043 ($3,251 - $3,952); one (1) part-time 24/40 Laboratory Technician II (VJVA) at salary level TC5-1095 ($3,423 - $4,161); one (1) full-time Institutional Services Worker-Generalist (1KVD) at salary level TB5-0922 ($2,884 - $3,506) APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jo-Anne Linares, 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 34 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Add 18 positions in varied classifications in the Health Services Department AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 460 FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action has an annual cost of approximately $2,416,931 which includes pension costs of $517,288. The costs will be completely offset by Federally Qualified Health Care and third party revenues. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting to add 18 positions as part of the expansion of services at the Antioch Health Center. Due to the increased volume and demand associated with the Affordable Care Act and the increased membership in the Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP), these expanded services are necessary to provide additional ambulatory care clinic hours of Family Practice Medicine to the residents of East Contra Costa County. The increased clinic services will allow a total of 1,386 patient visits per week with full capacity which is implemented in three phases. These 18 positions are included in Phase Two, and a subsequent request for the final Phase Three will be submitted at a later date. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Antioch Health Center will not have adequate staffing to provide increased patient care services for our CCHP members and residents in East Contra Costa County. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 21891 HSD P300 No. 21891 Attachment 1 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS P300 #21891 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 461 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21891 DATE 7/18/2016 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0540 Org No. 6410 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add 18 permanent positions in the Health Services Department as specified in Attachment 1. Proposed Effective Date: 8/3/2016 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $2,416,931.40 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $2,014,109.50 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT 100% FQHC and third party revenues Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Jo-Anne Linares ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 7/25/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 7/25/2016 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 462 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 7/25/2016 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 463 POSITION ADJUSTMENT RESOLUTION NO. 21891 - ATTACHMENT 1 ANTIOCH HEALTH CENTER EXPANSION PHASE II – ADD 18 POSITIONS Two (2) 40/40 - Exempt Medical Staff – Physicians (VPW9) Two (2) 40/40 – Family Nurse Practitioners (VWSB) One (1) 40/40 - Charge Nurse (VWTF) One (1) 40/40 - Registered Nurse - Advanced Level (VWXE) Three (3) 40/40 – Licensed Vocational Nurse (VT7G) Three (3) 40/40 – Certified Medical Assistant (VTWC) Two (2) 40/40 - Clerk – Senior Level (JWXC) One (1) (32/40) Clerk – Senior Level (JWXC) One (1) 40/40 - Community Health Worker II (VKVB) One (1) 24/40 - Laboratory Technician II (VJVA) One (1) 40/40 – Institutional Services Worker – Generalist (1KVD) AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 464 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES465 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES466 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21895 to add the following represented positions in the Health Services Department: four (4) full-time Exempt Medical Staff Physician (VPW9) at salary level 1P5-2312 ($11,052 - $14,856); three (3) full-time Family Nurse Practitioner (VWSB) at salary level L35-1873 ($9,249 - $11,242); one (1) full-time Charge Nurse (VWTF) at salary level L35-1883 ($9,341 - $10,298); two (2) full-time Registered Nurse-Experienced Level (VWXD) at salary level L3H-0400 ($7,853 - $8,753); eight (8) full-time Licensed Vocational Nurse (VT7G) at salary level TAX-1287 ($4,129 - $5,273); six (6) full-time Certified Medical Assistant (VTWC) at salary level TA5-1088 ($3,399 - $4,132); one (1) full-time Clerk-Specialist Level (JWXD) at salary level 3RX-1156 ($3,626 - $4,631); eight (8) full-time Clerk-Senior Level (JWXC) at salary level 3RX-1033 ($3,210 - $4,100); one (1) full-time Laboratory Technician II (VJVA) at salary level TC5-1095 ($3,423 - $4,160); one (1) full-time Institutional Services Worker-Generalist (1KVD) at salary level TB5-0922 ($2,884 - $3,505) APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jo-Anne Linares, 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 38 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Add 35 permanent positions in the Health Services Department AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 467 FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will have an approximate annual cost of $4,604,219 with pension costs of $994,730 already included. The costs will be entirely offset with Federally Qualified Health Care revenues. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting to add 35 positions allocated to the Brentwood Health Center to meet the increased volume and patient care demand associated with the Affordable Care Act and the resulting growth of membership in the Contra Costa Health Plan. Data shows the majority of members reside in East Contra Costa County, and to accommodate this growth, the Department is expanding its ambulatory care patient services in Antioch, Pittsburg, and Brentwood Health Centers. The Department is submitting individual position adjustment resolutions for each health center expansion in several phases. The Brentwood Health Center is currently undergoing construction to add 12 examination rooms for Family Practice Medicine. Family Practice Clinics will increase its weekly hours from 200 to 608 with full capacity and serve a weekly average of 1,520 patient visits. These expanded services will be implemented in three phases with the initial 35 positions added in Phase I. Subsequent requests will be submitted at a later date. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Brentwood Health Center will not have adequate staffing to meet increased demand and volume of patient care services for our CCHP members and residents of East Contra Costa County. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 21895 HSD P300 No. 21895 Attachment 1 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS P300 #21895 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 468 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21895 DATE 7/21/2016 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0540 Org No. 6390 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add 35 permanent positions in the Health Services Department as specified in Attachment 1. Proposed Effective Date: 8/3/2016 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $4,604,219.72 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $3,836,849.70 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT 100% FQHC Revenues Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Jo-Anne Linares ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 7/25/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 7/25/2016 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 469 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 7/27/2016 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 470 POSITION ADJUSTMENT RESOLUTION NO. 21895 ATTACHMENT 1 BRENTWOOD HEALTH CENTER EXPANSION PHASE I – ADD 35 POSITIONS four (4) 40/40 - Exempt Medical Staff – Physicians (VPW9) three (3) 40/40 – Family Nurse Practitioners (VWSB) one (1) 40/40 – Charge Nurse (VWTF) two (2) 40/40 - Registered Nurse - Experienced Level (VWXD) eight (8) 40/40 – Licensed Vocational Nurse (VT7G) six (6) 40/40 – Certified Medical Assistant (VTWC) one (1) 40/40 - Clerk – Specialist (JWXD) eight (8) 40/40 - Clerk – Senior Level (JWXC) one (1) 40/40 - Laboratory Technician II (VJVA) one (1) 40/40 – Institutional Services Worker – Generalist (1KVD) AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 471 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES472 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES473 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21892 to add the following represented positions in the Health Services Department: five (5) full-time Exempt Medical Staff Physician (VPW9) at salary level 1P5-2312 ($11,052 - $14,864); four (4) full-time Family Nurse Practitioner (VWSB) at salary level L35-1873 ($9,249 - $11,242); one (1) full-time Registered Nurse-Experienced Level (VWXD) at salary level L3H-0400 ($7,853 - $8,753); seven (7) full-time Licensed Vocational Nurse (VT7G) at salary level TAX-1287 ($4,129 - $5,273); six (6) full-time Certified Medical Assistant (VTWC) at salary level TA5-1088 $3,399 - $4,132); two (2) full-time Clerk-Specialist Level (JWXD) at salary level 3RX-1156 ($3,626 - $4,631); seven (7) full-time Clerk-Senior Level (JWXC) at salary level 3RX-1033 ($3,210 - $4,100); one (1) full-time Senior Radiologic Technologist (V8VA) at salary level TC5-1737 ($6,463 - $7,856); one (1) full-time Community Health Worker II (VKVB) at salary level TC5-1043 ($3,251 - $3,951); one (1) full-time Laboratory Technician II (VJVA) at salary level TC5-1095 ($3,423 - $4,160); one (1) full-time Institutional Services Worker-Generalist (1KVD) at salary level TB5-0922 ($2,884 - $3,505) APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jo-Anne Linares, 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 35 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Add 36 positions in varied classifications in the Health Services Department AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 474 FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action has an annual cost of approximately $4,671,895 which includes pension costs of $1,014,493. The entire cost is completely offset by Federally Qualified Health Care revenues. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting to add 36 varied positions allocated to the Pittsburg Health Center to meet the increased volume and patient demand associated with the Affordable Care Act and the resulting growth of membership in the Contra Costa Health Plan. Data shows the majority of members resides in East Contra Costa County and to accommodate this growth, the Department is expanding its ambulatory care patient services in Antioch, Brentwood and Pittsburg Health Centers. The Department is submitting separate requests per heath center in several phases. The Pittsburg Health Center is being renovated to add 16 examination rooms for Family Practice Medicine in addition to one room dedicated to patient group sessions. The increase in capacity will allow approximately 612 additional weekly hours of ambulatory care visits at full capacity. These expanded services will be implemented in three phases with the initial 36 positions added in Phase I. Subsequent requests for Phase II and Phase III will be submitted at a later time. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Pittsburg Health Center will not have adequate staffing to meet the increased demand and volume of patient care services for our CCHP members and residents of East Contra Costa County. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 21892 HSD P300 No. 21892 Attachment 1 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS P300 #21892 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 475 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21892 DATE 7/20/2016 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0540 Org No. 6388 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add 36 permanent positions in the Health Services Department as specified in Attachment 1. Proposed Effective Date: 8/3/2016 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $4,686,772.02 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $3,905,643.30 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT 100% FQHC Revenues Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Jo-Anne Linares ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 7/25/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 7/25/2016 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 476 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 7/25/2016 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 477 POSITION ADJUSTMENT RESOLUTION NO. 21892 ATTACHMENT 1 PITTSBURG HEALTH CENTER EXPANSION PHASE I – ADD 36 POSITIONS five (5) 40/40 - Exempt Medical Staff – Physicians (VPW9) four (4) 40/40 – Family Nurse Practitioners (VWSB) one (1) 40/40 - Registered Nurse - Experienced Level (VWXD) seven (7) 40/40 – Licensed Vocational Nurse (VT7G) six (6) 40/40 – Certified Medical Assistant (VTWC) two (2) 40/40 - Clerk – Specialist (JWXD) seven (7) 40/40 - Clerk – Senior Level (JWXC) one (1) 4040 – Senior Radiologic Technologist (V8VA) one (1) 40/40 - Community Health Worker II (VKVB) one (1) 40/40 - Laboratory Technician II (VJVA) one (1) 40/40 – Institutional Services Worker – Generalist (1KVD) AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 478 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES479 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES480 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21889 to add one (1) full-time Public Health Program Specialist II (VBND) position at salary level ZA5-1711 ($75,593-$91,884) and cancel vacant Administrative Services Assistant II (APVA) position #16343 in the Health Services Department. (Both represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will have an annual cost of approximately $28,145 which includes $6,797 in pension costs. The cost will be funded by 65% Center for Disease Control funds and 35% Ryan White funds. BACKGROUND: The AIDS/STD Program of the Public Health Division fosters the development, implementation and coordination of programs to reduce the transmission of HIV, provide comprehensive services for people with HIV and enhance community awareness of AIDS to increase understanding and compassionate response. The Public Health Division has a vacant Administrative Services Assistant II position #16343. Initially, it was decided to use this classification to handle the administrative duties in the AIDS/STD Program. However, due to complex regulatory and fiscal requirements in administering the AIDS/STD Program, the department determined that the Public Health Program Specialist II is the most appropriate classification APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Arlene J. Lozada (925)957-5269 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 32 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Add and cancel positions in the Health Services Department AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 481 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) to use. Adding the higher paid Public Health Program Specialist II and cancelling the vacant lower paid Administrative Services Assistant II position, would result to an additional cost of $28,145.80. The Public Health Program Specialist II position incumbent will plan, organize and administer the AIDS/STD program. Majority of the incumbent’s responsibilities will include providing staff direction, establishing and implementing policies, monitoring program activities including budget expenditures and evaluating the effectiveness of the overall program. Adding the Public Health Program Specialist II position will help accomplish program efficiencies and deliverables while meeting funding requirements. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, State mandated deadlines will not be accomplished due to staff shortage. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 21889 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS P300 #21889 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 482 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21889 DATE 7/18/2016 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0450 Org No. 5825 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add one (1) Public Health Program Specialist II (VBND) position and cancel one (1) full-time Administrative Assistant II position #16343 in the Health Services Department. Proposed Effective Date: 8/3/2016 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $28,145.80 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $6,797.12 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT 65% Center for Disease Control & 35% Ryan White Funds Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Arlene J. Lozada ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 7/25/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 7/25/2016 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 483 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 7/25/2016 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 484 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES485 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21894 to add one (1) full-time Public Health Program Specialist I (VBSD) position at salary level ZA5-1602 ($5,655-$6,874) and cancel a vacant part-time Community Health Worker II (VKVB) position #16431 and a vacant full-time Clerk-Specialist Level (JWXD) position #8486 in the Health Services Department. (All represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will result in approximate annual cost savings of $9,459. BACKGROUND: The Women, Infants and Children (WIC) Program is a federally funded health and nutrition program that helps pregnant and postpartum women, infants and children under 5 years old. Under this program, they are encouraged to eat healthy foods and live a healthy and active life. Women, infants and children who qualify, are able to take advantage of various services such as breastfeeding support, nutrition and health education classes, checks to buy healthy foods, and referrals for health care and community services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Arlene J. Lozada (925) 957-5269 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 36 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one (1) full-time position and cancel one (1) full-time and one (1) part-time positions in the Health Services Department AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 486 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The WIC Program at the Concord Site has 13 staff members which include Clerks, Community Health Workers, Home Economists, Public Health Nutritionist, Senior Public Health Nutritionist and an Administrative Intern. The Public Health Program Specialist I will be assigned to provide immediate staff direction to these 13 employees. The Public Health Division has determined that adding one full-time Public Health Program Specialist I position will better serve its current operational needs. The incumbent will ensure that services and program efficiencies are administered and delivered to the clients it serves. The Community Health Worker II position #16431 and Clerk-Specialist Level position #8486 are currently vacant. Cancelling both positions and adding the Public Health Program Specialist I position is deemed appropriate. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, program operational needs will not be fully achieved due to staffing shortage in a supervisory level. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 21894 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS P300 #21894 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 487 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21894 DATE 7/18/2016 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0450 Org No. 5828 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add one (1) Public Health Program Specialist I (VBSD) position and cancel one (1) part-time Community Health Woker II (VKVB) position #16431 and one (1) full time Clerk-Specialist Level (JWXD) position #8486 in the Health Services Department. Proposed Effective Date: 8/3/2016 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost ($9,459.33) Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY ($8,671.05) N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Cost Savings Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Arlene J. Lozada ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 7/25/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 7/25/2016 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 488 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 7/27/2016 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 489 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES490 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21890 to add one (1) full-time Pre-Hospital Care Coordinator (VBSG) position at salary level ZB5-1766 ($8,050 - $8,972) in the Health Services Department. (Represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will have an annual cost of approximately $172,423 which includes $38,221 in pension costs. The cost will be 100% offset from Hospital Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: The Emergency Medical Services (EMS) of the Health Services Department is a vital unit that is an integrated system of private and public providers rendering emergency medical care. It is a community-based health management model that provides acute illness, injury care and follow-up. It also contributes to treatment of chronic conditions and community health monitoring. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Arlene J. Lozada (925)957-5269 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 33 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one (1) full-time position in the Health Services Department AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 491 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) The Emergency Medical Services needs to restructure its functions previously provided by contractors associated with the Hospital Preparedness Program. Given this change, it is necessary to add the Pre-Hospital Care Coordinator position and the incumbent will then be responsible for hospital preparedness, the Medical Reserve Corps and the Heartsafe Community Outreach. In addition, the Pre-Hospital Care Coordinator will plan and coordinate EMS activities, develop and implement EMS system policies procedures and programs, monitor and evaluate emergency medical care provided by EMS pre-hospital personnel and EMS provider agencies. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, EMS will not have a position assigned to perform the functions as a result of its restructuring efforts. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 21890 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS P300 #21890 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 492 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21890 DATE 7/18/2016 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0540 Org No. 6543 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add one (1) Pre-Hospital Care Coordinator (VBSG) position in the Health Services Department. Proposed Effective Date: 8/3/2016 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $172,423.81 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $114,949.21 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT 100% Cost Offset from Hospital Enterprise Fund I Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Arlene J. Lozada ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 7/25/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 7/25/2016 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 493 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 7/25/2016 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 494 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES495 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21888 to add one (1) Mental Health Program Chief (VQDN) position at salary plan and grade level ZA5 – 2029 ($8,298 – $10,087) in the Health Services Department. (Represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will have an annual cost of approximately $192,092, including pension costs of $42,971. Costs will be 100% funded by Hospital Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting to add a Mental Health Program Chief position for Mental Health Detention Services. The Mental Health Detention service areas have become more diverse and complex with the addition of PRIME projects such as 2.3 Complex Care for High Risk Patients, 2.2 Care Transitions for Post-Acute Care Coordination, and 1.1 Behavioral Health Integration. Additionally, the increase in volume of patients due to the ACA and the Medi-Cal expansion APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Melissa Carofanello - melissa.carofanello@hsd.cccounty.us - 925-957-5248 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 30 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:ADD one (1) Mental Health Program Chief in the Health Services Department. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 496 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) has impacted these programs so that it is no longer feasible for one program chief to manage. Federal and state laws require the delivery of mental health services in detention. Not having a dedicated Mental Health Program Chief to ensure the delivery high quality mental health services in the detention setting can lead to inmates receiving substandard care. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Health Services Department will not be able to have the appropriate level of supervision for its Mental Health Detention. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 21888 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS P300 #21888 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 497 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21888 DATE 7/11/2016 Department No./ Department HEALTH SERVICES Budget Unit No. 0301 Org No. 5710 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add one Mental Health Program Chief (VQDN) position in the Health Services Department. Proposed Effective Date: 8/3/2016 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $192,092.74 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $176,085.01 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Hospital Enterprise Fund I Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Melissa Carofanello ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 7/25/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resources review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 7/25/2016 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 498 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 7/25/2016 No. 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 499 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES500 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21875 to add one (1) Social Casework Assistant (XDVB) (represented) position at Salary Plan and Grade 255 1434 ($4,604--$5,596) and cancel one (1) Children Services Aide (XDWB) (represented) vacant position #13576 at Salary Plan and Grade 2D5 0850 ($2,582—$3,138) in the Children and Families Services Bureau of the Employment and Human Services Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval of this position there is an additional annual cost of $28,839. This position is funded with 42% Federal and 48% State revenue and 10% County Funds.The annual pension costs is approximately $19,338. BACKGROUND: The Assembly Bill 938 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cheryl Morse (925) 313-1558 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: EHSD C. 28 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Add one Social Casework Assistant and Cancel one Children Services Aide in EHSD AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 501 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) - Chapter 261, Sections 309 and 628 of the Welfare and Institutions Code was amended to improve outcomes for children in foster care. Assembly Bill 938 requires when a child is removed from his or her parents the child's social worker or probation officer must identify and locate the child’s relatives within 30 days. (Approved by Governor Brown, October 11, 2009). In addition, Assembly Bill 938 implements federal requirements that seek to ensure children who have been removed from their parents can still be cared for by relatives. The department has assessed that the job duties to be performed are within the Social Casework Assistant classification, and not the Children's Services Aide classification. Based on the job duties to be performed, the department's request to cancel a current vacant Children's Services Aide position and add one Social Casework Assistant position is appropriate. The Social Casework Assistant will be responsible for researching multiple databases for prospective adult relatives for notification and possible relative placement, coordinating with social workers, professionals and other parties related to the case in order to attempt to maintain the child with the child's family. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Social Casework Assistant position is not added, the Children and Family Services Bureau will not have sufficient staff to comply with Assembly Bill 938 requirements of contacting possible relatives for placement of children removed from there parents or temporary home. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: A Social Casework Assistant working with families who find themselves in the foster care system requires the ability to engage and assess the family, as well as the ability to deescalate situations. The outcomes supported are: (2) Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood; (4) Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing; and (5) Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 21875 EHSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS P300 #21875 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 502 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21875 DATE 6/14/2016 Department No./ Department Employment and Human Services Budget Unit No. 0502 Org No. 5216 Agency No. A19 Action Requested: Add one Social Casework Assistant (XDVB) position and cancel one Children's Services Aide (XDWB) position 13576 in Children and Family Services Bureau (AR38319) Proposed Effective Date: 7/12/2016 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $28,839.00 Net County Cost $2,884.00 Total this FY $28,839.00 N.C.C. this FY $2,884.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT 42% Federal, 48% State and 10% County Cost Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Anne Crisp 313-1527 ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Kevin J. Corrigan 6/30/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 7/6/2016 Add one Social Casework Assistant (XDVB) (represented) position at Salary Plan and Grade 255 1434 ($4,604--$5,596) and cancel one vacant Children Services Aide (XDWB) (represented) position #13576 at Salary Plan and Grade 2D5 0850 ($2,582—$3,138) Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Otilia Parra 7/6/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 7/25/2016 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 503 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 7/25/2016 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 504 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES505 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21893 to add two (2) full-time Health Education Specialist (VMWD) positions at salary level and grade TC5-1207 ($3,825-$4,649) in the Health Services Department. (Represented) FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action will have an annual cost of approximately $192,316 which includes $39,607 in pension costs. The cost will be a 100% offset from Federally Qualified Health Care (FQHC) revenues. BACKGROUND: The Public Health Clinic Services of the Health Services Department provide a variety of low or no-cost services in our health centers, mobile clinics and at public schools. The two Health Education Specialists to be added will provide support in School Based Health Center clinics serving school-age students up to 19 years of age. The Health Education Specialists will assist in implementing educational and health promotion activities. The incumbents will also APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Arlene J. Lozada (925)957-5269 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 31 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Add two (2) full-time positions in the Health Services Department AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 506 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) assist in planning, conducting, and evaluating the health education and health prevention aspects of departmental programs. Duties include conferring with and advising staff on health education and preventative health principles and techniques of community organization. Undertaking health promotion activities will entail reviewing publications for educational suitability, maintaining and distributing health educational materials to the staff and the general public, and publicizing health programs and services through various media. In addition, the Health Education Specialists will conduct needs assessments and prepare reports on health education services and educational programs. Clinic Services will be expanding its School Based Health Center Services in Brentwood (two Middle Schools and two High Schools) under the Liberty Union High School District. Due to this expansion, the Department determined that adding the two Health Education Specialist positions is appropriate. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, program deliverables and requirements will not be accomplished due to staffing shortage. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable AGENDA ATTACHMENTS P300 No. 21893 HSD MINUTES ATTACHMENTS P300 #21893 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 507 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21893 DATE 7/18/2016 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0450 Org No. 5797 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Add two (2) Health Education Specialist (VMWD) positions in the Health Services Department. Proposed Effective Date: 8/3/2016 Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $192,316.25 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $128,210.83 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT 100% Federally Qualified Health Care Revenues Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Arlene J. Lozada ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Enid Mendoza 7/25/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE Exempt from Human Resoures review under delegated authority. Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE 7/25/2016 Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Enid Mendoza Other: Approve as recommended by the department. ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 508 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 7/27/2016 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 509 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES510 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Position Adjustment Resolution No. 21887 to reallocate the classifications of the Pharmacist I (VYWA) (represented) position from Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1998 ($8,369 - $9,689) to Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1998 ($10,043 - $11,626), Pharmacist II (VYTA) (represented) position from Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1964 ($8,092 - $10,328) to Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1964 ($9,711 - $12,394), Pharmacy Technician (VY9B) (represented) position from Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1065 ($3,322 - $4,039) to Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1065 ($3,987 - $4,846), and the Clinical/Drug Information Coordinator (VYSD) (represented) position from Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1923 ($7,770 - $9,917) to Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1923 ($9,324 - $11,900) on the Salary Schedule in the Health Services Department. FISCAL IMPACT: Upon approval, this action has an annual cost of approximately $1,105,572.89 with pension costs of $266,992.09 already included. The cost is completely offset by Enterprise Fund I. BACKGROUND: The Health Services Department is requesting the salary reallocations due to recruitment and retention issues as a result of the base salaries of Pharmacy classifications not being competitive. There are 25 permanent-full APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jo-Anne Linares, (925) 957-5240 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: Jo-Anne Linares, Lisa Lopez, Assistant Director of Human Resources, Harjit S. Nahal, Assistant County Auditor C. 37 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Reallocate the classification of Pharmacist I and II, Clinical/Drug Information Coordinator, and Pharmacy Technician on the Salary Schedule AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 511 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) time Pharmacist positions, and although the recruitment is open on a continuous basis, 12 positions remain vacant. Since 2014, the Department has experienced voluntary resignations from eight (8) Pharmacists in addition to two (2) retirements. Consequently, this staffing shortage forced the Department to rearrange staff schedules to meet core hours of operation. A recent salary survey of Bay Area counties indicated the County's compensation in the pharmaceutical field is significantly below market. In order to attract and retain employees, it becomes necessary to reallocate the salaries to compete with surrounding Bay Area counties. The Meet and Confer process has been completed. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this action is not approved, the Department is in jeopardy of maintaining critical staffing levels required to provide pharmaceutical services to the patients of Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and its Health Centers, and members of the Contra Costa Health Plan. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS AIR 26529 P300 21887 Salary Reallocation AIR 26529 P300 21887 Recommendation Attachment MINUTES ATTACHMENTS P300 #21887 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 512 POSITION ADJUSTMENT REQUEST NO. 21887 DATE 7/21/2016 Department No./ Department Health Services Budget Unit No. 0540 Org No. 6345 Agency No. A18 Action Requested: Reallocate the salaries of Pharmacist I (VYWA) and II (VYTA), Pharmacy Technician (VY9B) and Clinical/Drug Coordination Information (VYSD) in the Health Services Department. (See Attachment 1) Proposed Effective Date: Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No / Cost is within Department’s budget: Yes No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with request: $0.00 Estimated total cost adjustment (salary / benefits / one time): Total annual cost $1,105,572.89 Net County Cost $0.00 Total this FY $921,310.66 N.C.C. this FY $0.00 SOURCE OF FUNDING TO OFFSET ADJUSTMENT Enterprise Fund 1 Department must initiate necessary adjustment and submit to CAO. Use additional sheet for further explanations or comments. Jo-Anne Linares ______________________________________ (for) Department Head REVIEWED BY CAO AND RELEASED TO HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Kevin J. Corrigan 7/21/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ Deputy County Administrator Date HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS DATE 7/27/2016 See Attached Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic / Exempt salary schedule. Effective: Day following Board Action. (Date) Gladys Scott Reid 7/27/2016 ___________________________________ ________________ (for) Director of Human Resources Date COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION: DATE Approve Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Disapprove Recommendation of Director of Human Resources Other: ____________________________________________ ___________________________________ (for) County Administrator BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ACTION: David J. Twa, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Adjustment is APPROVED DISAPPROVED and County Administrator DATE BY APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A PERSONNEL / SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT POSITION ADJUSTMENT ACTION TO BE COMPLETED BY HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT FOLLOWING BOARD ACTION Adjust class(es) / position(s) as follows: P300 (M347) Rev 3/15/01 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 513 REQUEST FOR PROJECT POSITIONS Department Date 7/27/2016 No. xxxxxx 1. Project Positions Requested: 2. Explain Specific Duties of Position(s) 3. Name / Purpose of Project and Funding Source (do not use acronyms i.e. SB40 Project or SDSS Funds) 4. Duration of the Project: Start Date End Date Is funding for a specified period of time (i.e. 2 years) or on a year-to-year basis? Please explain. 5. Project Annual Cost a. Salary & Benefits Costs: b. Support Costs: (services, supplies, equipment, etc.) c. Less revenue or expenditure: d. Net cost to General or other fund: 6. Briefly explain the consequences of not filling the project position(s) in terms of: a. potential future costs d. political implications b. legal implications e. organizational implications c. financial implications 7. Briefly describe the alternative approaches to delivering the services which you have considered. Indicate why these alternatives were not chosen. 8. Departments requesting new project positions must submit an updated cost benefit analysis of each project position at the halfway point of the project duration. This report is to be submitted to the Human Resources Department, which will forward the report to the Board of Supervisors. Indicate the date that your cost / benefit analysis will be submitted 9. How will the project position(s) be filled? a. Competitive examination(s) b. Existing employment list(s) Which one(s)? c. Direct appointment of: 1. Merit System employee who will be placed on leave from current job 2. Non-County employee Provide a justification if filling position(s) by C1 or C2 USE ADDITIONAL PAPER IF NECESSARY AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 514 AIR 26529 P300 21887 Reallocate the classifications of the Pharmacist I (VYWA) (represented) position from Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1998 ($8,369 - $9,689) to Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1998 ($10,043 - $11,626), Pharmacist II (VYTA) (represented) position from Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1964 ($8,092 - $10,328) to Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1964 ($9,711 - $12,394), Pharmacy Technician (VY9B) (represented) position from Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1065 ($3,322 - $4,039) to Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1065 ($3,987 - $4,846), and the Clinical/Drug Information Coordinator (VYSD) (represented) position from Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1923 ($7,770 - $9,917) to Salary Plan and Grade TC5 1923 ($9,324 - $11,900) on the Salary Schedule AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 515 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES516 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES517 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #23-429-3 with John Muir Health (dba John Muir Medical Center), Concord Campus, a non-profit corporation, to act as a designated center to assist patients who have been assessed by ambulance personnel with a cardiac condition known as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), for the period from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Contractor will pay County a $5,000 fee to offset the costs of County’s oversight activities. There is no general fund impact. BACKGROUND: In collaboration with hospitals, first-responders, and transport agencies, Contra Costa’s Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agency has been working towards implementing a program designating hospitals as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) receiving centers. The designated centers will provide the most advanced and rapid care for patients with heart attacks known as STEMI by unblocking arteries in the heart in a rapid fashion. Heart attacks represent a major cause of death and disability in the United States, affecting over 400,000 persons annually. This kind of heart attack occurs among 2.5% to 5% of patients with chest pain or other cardiac symptoms. The number of STEMI affected patients identified by Contra Costa EMS providers are estimated to be in the range of 100-150 patients per year. On September 17, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-429-2, with John Muir Health (dba John Muir Medical Center), Concord Campus, to act as a designated STEMI receiving center APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 313-9560 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: T Scott , M Wilhelm C. 43 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Contract #23-429-3 with John Muir Health (dba John Muir Medical Center, Concord Campus) AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 518 to provide specialized treatment for STEMI patients with a cardiac condition for the period from September 1, 2013 through August 31, 2016. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 519 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract #23-429-3 will allow Contractor to continue providing services through August 31, 2019, including mutual indemnification. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, this designated STEMI receiving center would be disrupted and patients with life threatening cardiac conditions could experience delays in definitive care increasing the risk of permanent disability or death. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 520 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #23-430-3 with John Muir Health Inc. (dba John Muir Health) Walnut Creek Campus, a non-profit corporation, to act as a designated center to assist patients who have been assessed by ambulance personnel with a cardiac condition known as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), for the period from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Contractor will pay County a fee of $5,000 per year to offset the costs of County’s oversight activities. There is no general fund impact. BACKGROUND: In collaboration with hospitals, first-responders, and transport agencies, Contra Costa’s Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agency has been working towards implementing a program designating hospitals as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) receiving centers. The designated centers will provide the most advanced and rapid care for patients with heart attacks known as STEMI by unblocking arteries in the heart in a rapid fashion. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 313-9560 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: T Scott , M Wilhelm C. 44 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Contract #23-430-3 with John Muir Health, Inc. (dba John Muir Health Walnut Creek Campus) AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 521 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Heart attacks represent a major cause of death and disability in the United States, affecting over 400,000 persons annually. This kind of heart attack occurs among 2.5% to 5% of patients with chest pain or other cardiac symptoms. The number of STEMI patients identified by Contra Costa EMS providers are estimated to be in the range of 100-150 patients per year. On September 17, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-430-2 with John Muir Health, Inc (dba John Muir Medical Center Walnut Creek Campus), to act as a designated STEMI receiving center to provide specialized treatment for STEMI patients with a cardiac condition, for the period from September 1, 2013 through August 31, 2016. Approval of Contract #23-430-3 will allow John Muir Health, Inc to continue providing services through August 31, 2019, including mutual indemnification. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, this designated STEMI receiving center would be disrupted and patients with life threatening cardiac conditions could experience delays in definitive care increasing the risk of permanent disability or death. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 522 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and authorize the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #23-434-3 with Kaiser Foundation Hospitals - Walnut Creek Medical Center, a non-profit corporation, to act as a designated center to assist patients who have been assessed by ambulance personnel with a cardiac condition known as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), for the period from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Contractor will pay County a fee of $5,000 per year to offset the costs of County’s oversight activities. There is no general fund impact. BACKGROUND: In collaboration with hospitals, first-responders, and transport agencies, Contra Costa’s Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agency has been working towards implementing a program designating hospitals as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) receiving centers. The designated centers will provide the most advanced and rapid care for patients with heart attacks known as STEMI by unblocking arteries in the heart in a rapid fashion. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 313-9560 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: T Scott , M Wilhelm C. 46 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Contract #23-434-3 with Kaiser Foundation Hospitals - Walnut Creek Medical Center AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 523 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Heart attacks represent a major cause of death and disability in the United States, affecting over 400,000 persons annually. This kind of heart attack occurs among 2.5% to 5% of patients with chest pain or other cardiac symptoms. The number of STEMI patients identified by Contra Costa EMS providers are estimated to be in the range of 100-150 patients per year. On September 17, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-434-3 with Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Walnut Creek to act as a designated STEMI receiving center to provide specialized treatment for STEMI patients with a cardiac condition, through August 31, 2016. Approval of Contract #23-434-3 will allow the Contractor to continue providing services through August 31, 2019, including mutual indemnification. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, this designated STEMI receiving center would be disrupted and patients with life threatening cardiac conditions could experience delays in definitive care increasing the risk of permanent disability or death. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 524 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #23-437-3 with San Ramon Regional Medical Center, a non-profit corporation, to act as a designated center to assist patients who have been assessed by ambulance personnel with a cardiac condition known as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), for the period from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Contractor will pay County a fee of $5,000 per year to offset the costs of County’s oversight activities. There is no general fund impact. BACKGROUND: In collaboration with hospitals, first-responders, and transport agencies, Contra Costa’s Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agency has been working towards implementing a program designating hospitals as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) receiving centers. The designated centers will provide the most advanced and rapid care for patients with heart attacks known as STEMI by unblocking arteries in the heart in a rapid fashion. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 313-9560 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: T Scott , M Wilhelm C. 45 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Contract #23-437-3 with San Ramon Regional Medical Center AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 525 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Heart attacks represent a major cause of death and disability in the United States, affecting over 400,000 persons annually. This kind of heart attack occurs among 2.5% to 5% of patients with chest pain or other cardiac symptoms. The number of STEMI patients identified by Contra Costa EMS providers are estimated to be in the range of 100-150 patients per year. On September 10, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-437-2 with San Ramon Regional Medical Center to act as a designated STEMI receiving center to provide specialized treatment for STEMI patients with cardiac conditions, for the period from September 1, 2013 through August 31, 2016. Approval of Contract #23-437-3 will allow the Contractor to continue providing services through August 31, 2019, including mutual indemnification. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, Contractor will not act as a designated STEMI receiving center for patients with cardiac conditions. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 526 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #23-442-3 with Sutter East Bay Hospitals (dba Sutter Delta Medical Center), a non-profit corporation, to act as a designated center to assist patients who have been assessed by ambulance personnel with a cardiac condition known as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), for the period from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Contractor will pay County a fee of $5,000 per year to offset the costs of County’s oversight activities. There is no general fund impact. BACKGROUND: In collaboration with hospitals, first-responders, and transport agencies, Contra Costa’s Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Agency has been working towards implementing a program designating hospitals as ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) receiving centers. The designated centers will provide the most advanced and rapid care for patients with heart attacks known as STEMI by unblocking arteries in the heart in a rapid fashion. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Frost, 313-9560 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: T Scott , M Wilhelm C. 47 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Contract #23-442-3 with Sutter East Bay Hospitals (dba Sutter Delta Medical Center) AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 527 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Heart attacks represent a major cause of death and disability in the United States, affecting over 400,000 persons annually. This kind of heart attack occurs among 2.5% to 5% of patients with chest pain or other cardiac symptoms. The number of STEMI patients identified by Contra Costa EMS providers are estimated to be in the range of 100-150 patients per year. On September 24, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #23-442-2 with Sutter East Bay Hospitals (dba Sutter Delta Medical Center), to act as a designated STEMI receiving center to provide specialized treatment for STEMI patients with a cardiac condition, for the period from September 1, 2013 through August 31, 2016. Approval of this Contract #23-442-3 will allow Contractor to continue to provide services through August 31, 2019, including mutual indemnification. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, Contractor will not act as a designated STEMI receiving center for patients with cardiac conditions. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 528 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Interagency Agreement #29-513-19 with Mount Diablo Unified School District, a government agency, to pay the County an amount not to exceed $533,891, to provide professional school-based mental health services, crisis intervention, and day treatment for certain Special Education and regular students, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this Interagency Agreement will result in an amount not to exceed $533,891 from Mount Diablo Unified School District. No County match required. BACKGROUND: Fred Finch Youth Center, Families First, and Seneca Residential & Day Treatment Center for Children work collaboratively with the County and school district personnel in developing program services and policies. The primary goal of the Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) Program and non-Medi-Cal mental health programs, are to continue to APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon, 957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: D Morgan, M Wilhelm C. 40 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Interagency Agreement #29–513–19 with Mount Diablo Unified School District AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 529 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) provide seriously emotionally disturbed children with the services and the support they need to function effectively in school, at home, and in the community. Approval of Interagency Agreement #29-513-19 will allow Mount Diablo Unified School District to continue to pay the County for the provision of professional mental health services through June 30, 2017. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved, special education and regular students will not receive school-based mental health services and crisis intervention services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 530 RECOMMENDATION(S): ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/469 authorizing the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to apply and accept the Board of State & Community Corrections, FY 2016-2018 Strengthening Law Enforcement and Community Corrections Grant in an initial amount of $600,000 for support of a proposed two-year program designed to collaborate with non-profit organizations and community members to develop strategies in neighborhoods disproportionately affected by poverty, crime, at-risk or vulnerable populations, and general quality of life issues. This action supersedes action by the Board of Supervisors on March 29, 2016, item number C.84 in which a resolution was not attached. FISCAL IMPACT: $600,000, 100% State funds, 20% County match, 30% pass through to community partner(s), and required set-aside funds of 5% or not less than $20,000 allotted for Local Evaluation Plan and related data collection. BACKGROUND: The Strengthening Law Enforcement and Community Relations Grant is intended to fund collaborative law enforcement-community partnerships that aim to improve, strengthen, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sandra Brown 925-335-1553 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 42 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Board of State & Community Corrections Grant AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 531 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) establish or reestablish positive and meaningful relationships between law enforcement and the communities they serve. The Office of the Sheriff is proposing to work in partnership with the YMCA of the USA, Housing Authority of Contra Costa County, the Head Start Program, LifeLong Medical, John Swett Unified School District, and the Bayo Vista Resident Council to address current and emerging issues impacting at-risk youth in the Bayo Vista Housing Development in the city of Rodeo. The main goal of our proposal is to promote public trust and reaffirm our guardianship role within the Bayo Vista community. A heightened focus will be placed on the issues of poverty, education, delinquency, health, and public safety and facilitating an achievable path for betterment through collaboration, positive interaction, creative programming, and successful resource allocation. The grant period for these funds is July 1, 2016 through the end of the grant funding and grantees have two years to spend funds. The maximum allowable grant amount is $600,000 for individual agencies with a 20% local match, 30% pass-through to designated partners and 5% allocation for data collection and evaluation. The local match obligation can be met through cash or in-kind matching funds, or combination of both. The Office of the Sheriff is seeking $600,000 in funding to assign a full-time deputy to the Bayo Vista Housing Development for the first year and a half-time funded deputy for the second year to oversee and coordinate the program. Additional funding (30%) will be provided to our non-profit counterparts, and remaining funding used for associated resources/materials specific to the program. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: A decision not to pursue grant funding would preclude the Office of the Sheriff’s efforts to develop a more comprehensive service delivery model and enhanced outreach to the Bayo Vista community. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The loss of needed services for at-risk youth residing in the Bayo Vista Housing Development. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/469 MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Res 2016/469 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 532 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE: John Gioia Candace Andersen Mary N. Piepho Karen Mitchoff Federal D. Glover NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/469 IN THE MATTER OF: Applying for and Accepting the FY 2016/2018 State of California Board of State and Community Corrections Strengthening Law Enforcement and Community Relations Grant. WHEREAS the County of Contra Costa is seeking funds available through the State of California Board of State and Community Corrections; Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Supervisors: Authorizes the Sheriff-Coroner, Undersheriff or the Sheriff's Chief of Management Services, to execute for and on behalf of the County of Contra Costa, a public entity established under the laws of the State of California, any actions necessary for the purpose of obtaining State financial assistance provided by the State of California. Contact: Sandra Brown 925-335-1553 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: 5 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 533 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES534 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, on behalf of the Workforce Development Board Bureau Small Business Development Center, to apply for and accept Community Services Block Grant funding for an amount not to exceed $115,000 from the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consortium, composed of Urban County ($50,000); Concord ($30,000); Pittsburg ($20,000; and, Walnut Creek ($15,000), for individualized business advice and group training to low-to-moderate income residents of the County for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: County to receive an amount not to exceed $115,000; Community Development Block Grant Consortium funding. (No County match) BACKGROUND: The Small Business Development Center (SBDC) delivers group training and individualized advising to support low-to-moderate income individuals achieve self sufficiency by starting and/or growing micro-enterprises. The project utilizes matching Small Business Administration funds to supports the creation of additional employment opportunities by delivering services focused on accessing capital, securing certifications & procurement contracts, and exporting & increasing sales. The Contra Costa Department of Conservation and Development will make funding available funding to provide these services to low income residents of the County. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres, 313-1717 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 39 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Community Development Block Grant Consortium funds AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 535 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without funding, services to low-to-moderate income individuals and micro-enterprises in Contra Costa County could not be designed and implemented by the Small Business Development Center. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 536 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with the Contra Costa Community College District in an amount not to exceed $631,125 to provide educational courses at the Law Enforcement Training Center for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: No County costs. $631,125 revenue.The College District will pay the Office of the Sheriff $3.75 per student instructional hour that is eligible for state general apportionment less guest lecturer costs and standard student enrollment fees. BACKGROUND: The Contra Costa Community College District provides educational courses through its various programs to meet the needs of the Office of the Sheriff's Training Program. The Contra Costa Community College District will transcript all acceptable coursework for the Office of the Sheriff's Law Enforcement Training Center students. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Office of the Sheriff will not be able to transcript certain classes taken by students of the Law Enforcement Training Center (LETC). In addition, $3.75 per student instructional hour will not be claimable, resulting in a budget shortfall of $631,125 in the LETC Enterprise Fund for fiscal year 2016/17. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sandra Brown, 335-1553 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 49 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Educational Courses for the Law Enforcement Training Center AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 537 CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 538 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to apply for and accept Senior Service America, Inc. grant funding in an amount not to exceed $271,704 for the Senior Community Service Employment Program for the period July 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: County to receive an amount not to exceed $271,704. (100% Federal) (County match $35,250) BACKGROUND: The Senior Community Service Employment Program provides employment-related services to low income seniors with the most-in-need characteristics. Most-in-need characteristics include veteran status, homelessness or at risk of homelessness, disability, English as a second language, limited literacy, frailty, and low employment prospects. Program participants may be placed in subsidized employment while they gain the necessary training and skills to become "job ready" for unsubsidized placement. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Without funding, employment training services to low income seniors would be curtailed. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Elaine Burres, 313-1717 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 41 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Senior Service America, Inc. grant funding AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 539 CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 540 RECOMMENDATION(S): Approve and Authorize the County Administrator, or designee, to apply for and accept a grant in an amount not to exceed $30,000 from the State of California, California Arts Council, for the County to provide advocacy for the advancement of the arts in Contra Costa County for the term of October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: The grant requires a 1:1 County match of the awarded amount of which 50% can be in-kind contributions. The County match is budgeted. BACKGROUND: Established by the Board of Supervisors in December 1996 as an official County commission and the authorized County partner with the California Arts Council, the Arts and Culture Commission (AC5) first applied for and received funding from the State-Local Partnership Program in July 1995 for fiscal year 1995-1996. Since that time, the Board of Supervisors has designated and reaffirmed the Arts and Culture Commission as the authorized partner of the State-Local Partnership Program of the California Arts Council. This APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Enid Mendoza, (925) 335-1039 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 48 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:State-Local Partnership Grant from the California Arts Council AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 541 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) designation allows the County to apply for and accept funding from the State to enhance art and culture programs in the county. The State-Local Partnership Program fosters community development through the arts at the county level via partnerships between the California Arts Council and a local arts agency. Partners benefit from funding, technical assistance and coordinated activities that support their efforts that enrich the lives of the members of their communities through the arts. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County will not receive available grant funds. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 542 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Richmond Elementary School, Inc. including modified indemnification language, in an amount not to exceed $210,816 to provide State Preschool services for the term July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% State funds California Department of Education BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County receives funds from California Department of Education to provide State Preschool services to program eligible County residents. In order to provide a wider distribution of services to County residents, the Department contracts with a number of community-based organizations. The State requires an indemnification clause with County subcontractors wherein the subcontractor holds harmless the State and its officers for any losses. Approval of this contract will allow the provision APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6346 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: Ericka Ramirez, Ressie Dayco, Cassandra Youngblood C. 74 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:2016-17 Richmond Elementary School, Inc. State Preschool childcare services contract AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 543 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of childcare services for 48 children enrolled in Richmond College Prep preschool programs. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County will not be able to more widely distribute childcare availability through partnership with community based agencies. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment & Human Services Department Community Services Bureau supports three of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes - Outcome 1: “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School,” Outcome 3: “Families that are Economically Self-sufficient,” and, Outcome 4: “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing.” These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 544 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract, including modified indemnification language, with We Care Services for Children, in an amount not to exceed $221,357, to provide State Preschool services for the term July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% State funds from the California Department of Education No County match BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County receives funds California Department of Education (CDE) to provide State Preschool and Pre-kindergarten Family Literacy services to program eligible County residents. The State requires an indemnification clause with County subcontractors wherein the subcontractor holds harmless the State and its officers for any losses. In order to provide a wider distribution of services to County residents, the Department contracts with a number of community-based organizations. Approval of APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: CSB (925) 681-6346 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: Ericka Ramirez, Ressie Dayco, Cassandra Youngblood C. 73 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:2016-17 We Care Services for Children State Preschool services contract AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 545 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) this contract will allow the provision of State Preschool services to 56 program-eligible children and families in the Central Contra Costa County area. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If not approved, County will not be able to more widely distribute childcare availability through partnership with community based agencies. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The Employment & Human Services Department Community Services Bureau supports three of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes - Outcome 1: “Children Ready for and Succeeding in School,” Outcome 3: “Families that are Economically Self-sufficient,” and, Outcome 4: “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing.” These outcomes are achieved by offering comprehensive services, including high quality early childhood education, nutrition, and health services to low-income children throughout Contra Costa County. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 546 RECOMMENDATION(S): (1) ADOPT Resolution No. 2016/154 accepting as complete the construction contract work performed by Roofing Constructors Inc. d/b/a Western Roofing Service for the Roof Replacement at 2099 Arnold Industrial Way, Concord project. (2) DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to file with the County Recorder a certified copy of Resolution No. 2016/154 and the attached Notice of Completion no later than fifteen (15) days after adoption. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact resulting from the adoption of the Resolution of Acceptance and Notice of Completion, but the adoption and recording will limit the period for filing stop payment notices and bond claims on this contract. BACKGROUND: The roof at the facility was identified in the Facilities Life-Cycle Investment Program report as being in poor condition and in need of replacement. The roof had APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ramesh Kanzaria, (925) 313-2000 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: PW Accounting, PW CPM Division Manager, PW CPM Project Manager, PW CPM Clerical, Auditor's Office, Auditor's Office, County Counsel's Office, County Administrator's Office, County Administrator's Office C. 50 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Adopt Resolution of Acceptance and Notice of Completion for the Roof Replacement at 2099 Arnold Industrial Way, Concord Project (WH286B) AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 547 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) begun leaking in a few spots. The project scope included the removal and replacement of existing roofing, flashing, drains and skylights. On August 18, 2015, the County entered into a construction contract with Roofing Constructors Inc. d/b/a Western Roofing Service for the subject project. The above contract has been completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. It is recommended that the work covered by the contract be accepted by adopting a Resolution of Acceptance and Notice of Completion (Resolution No. 2016/154). CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Accepting a contract as complete is standard procedure and allows for proper closeout of the contract. If the above contract is not accepted as complete, the period for filing stop payment notices and bond claims may be extended. AGENDA ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 2016/154 Notice of Completion MINUTES ATTACHMENTS Res 2016/154 signed AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 548 Recorded at the request of:Clerk of the Board of Supervisors Return To:Capital Projects Management Division, 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA and for Special Districts, Agencies and Authorities Governed by the Board Adopted this Resolution on 08/02/2016 by the following vote: AYE:John Gioia, District I SupervisorCandace Andersen, District II SupervisorMary N. Piepho, District III SupervisorKaren Mitchoff, District IV SupervisorFederal D. Glover, District V Supervisor NO: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: RECUSE: Resolution No. 2016/154 IN THE MATTER OF: Accepting and Giving Notice of Completion of Contract with Roofing Constructors Inc. d/b/a Western Roofing Service for the Roof Replacement at 2099 Arnold Industrial Way, Concord project, Authorization No. WH286B WHEREAS, on August 18, 2015, the County (Owner) contracted with Roofing Constructors Inc. d/b/a Western Roofing Service (General Contractor), for the above construction project, with XL Specialty Insurance Company as Surety, for work performed on Owner's property located at 2099 Arnold Industrial Way, Concord, and WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works reports that said work has been inspected and complies with the approved plans and specifications, and recommends it acceptance as of August 2, 2016. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that: 1. The contract work for the above project is accepted as recommended above; and 2. Within fifteen (15) days after adoption of this Resolution, the Clerk of the Board shall file with the County Recorder a certified copy of this Resolution of Acceptance and the attached Notice of Completion. Contact: Ramesh Kanzaria, (925) 313-2000 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: PW Accounting, PW CPM Division Manager, PW CPM Project Manager, PW CPM Clerical, Auditor's Office, Auditor's Office, County Counsel's Office, County Administrator's Office, County Administrator's Office AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 549 Recorded at the request of: Contra Costa County Public Works Dept. Capital Projects Management Div. When recorded, return to: Contra Costa County Public Works Dept. Capital Projects Management Div. 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553 NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Civil Code Section 9204) NOTICE IS GIVEN of completion of the following public work of improvement: (1) Project name: Roof Replacement at 2099 Arnold Industrial Way, Concord (2) Date of completion: August 2, 2016 (3) Name and address of Owner: Contra Costa County, c/o Contra Costa County Public Works Department, Capital Projects Management Division, 255 Glacier Drive, Martinez, CA 94553 (4) Name and address of Direct Contractor: Roofing Constructors, Inc., 15002 Wicks Boulevard, San Leandro, CA 94577 (5) Name and address of Construction Lender: None (6) Description of site: 2099 Arnold Industrial Way, Concord I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that I am the agent of the Owner named above, that I have read this Notice, that I know and understand the contents, and that the facts stated in the Notice are true and correct. Dated: August 2, 2016 Ramesh Kanzaria Contra Costa County Public Works Dept. Capital Projects Management Div. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 550 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES551 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the Public Works Director, a Change Order to Purchase Order No. 49916 with Xerox Corporation, to increase the payment limit by $450,000, to a new payment limit of $829,039, for monthly equipment maintenance, for the remainder of the lease which expires on December 14, 2018, Countywide. (100% Department User Fees) FISCAL IMPACT: 100% Department User Fees. BACKGROUND: Print and Mail Services provides high-speed copying and printing for departments. The maintenance charges of the lease on PO 49916 increased from $2472.24 a month to $2515.84 a month. The black copy impressions increased from $.039 to $.041 each; Large black copies from $.006 to $.0064 each and color copy impressions increased from $.0099 to $.0104 each on July 11, 2015. The amount of impressions produced increased significantly almost six months after the start of the contract which is the main contributor for the shortage on the value for the term of the contract. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dale Morseman 925-646-5515 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 60 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve a Change Order for Xerox Corporation to increase the maximum payment limit. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 552 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this request is not approved, Xerox could repossess the equipment for failure to fulfill the term of the contract, leaving Print and Mail Services without the necessary equipment to provide the departments with lower cost color copies. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 553 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Animal Services Department Director or designee, to execute a contract amendment with MWI Animal Health to increase the payment limit by $250,000 to a new payment limit of $700,000 for veterinary medical supplies and extend the term from September 30, 2016 through December 31, 2016. (37% User Fees, 54% City Revenue, 9% County General Fund) FISCAL IMPACT: $700,00: 37% User Fees, 54% City Revenue, 9% County General Fund BACKGROUND: MWI Animal Health is responsible for providing all of the Animal Services Department's medical and shelter supplies. The proposed amendment will provide the revenue necessary to continue to supplies necessary for the shelter animals veterinary needs. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Contra Costa's Animal shelter will be unable to purchase the supplies necessary to provide for the animal's needs. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: (925) 335-8370 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 54 To:Board of Supervisors From:Beth Ward, Animal Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve and Authorize a contract amendment with MWI Animal Health AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 554 CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 555 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with The Ratcliff Architects, effective August 2, 2016, to increase the payment limit by $400,000 to a new payment limit of $1,300,000, for as-needed architectural services, with no change to the original term, Countywide. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% various funds. Projects will be assigned to Ratcliff Architects when there is an approved project and funding. BACKGROUND: On September 10, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved an as-needed Consulting Services Agreement with The Ratcliff Architects ("Ratcliff") an amount of $400,000. On December 15, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Amendment No. 1 in the amount of $500,000. Ratcliff is the architect that has been assigned the Family Practice Clinic Expansion on the 2nd floor at 2311 Loveridge Road in Pittsburg since the beginning of the project. This project has just been awarded and still requires construction administration. Ratcliff is also currently working on construction documents APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ramesh Kanzaria, (925) 313-2000 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: PW Accounting, PW CPM Division Manager, PW CPM Clerical, Auditor's Office, County Counsel's Office, County Administrator's Office, County Administrator's Office C. 64 To:Board of Supervisors From:Julia R. Bueren, Public Works Director/Chief Engineer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:APPROVE and AUTHORIZE Amendment No. 2 to Consulting Services Agreement with The Ratcliff Architects for As-Needed Architectural Services AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 556 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) for the Tenant Improvements on the 1st floor of the Pittsburg Health Center. In addition, Ratcliff is under contract working on several other health care facilities projects, mainly at the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center in Martinez, and on a smaller Facilities Life-Cycle Investment Program (FLIP) project at the Martinez Detention Facility. The contract limit of $900,000 has nearly been reached. Amendment No. 2 is necessary to provide for the additional costs associated with the completion of design services, including bidding and permit phases, complying with the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development and/or County Building Inspection requirements, and construction administration for these ongoing projects. Ratcliff is familiar with these active projects, and the design and construction of health care facilities; therefore, it is recommended that the contract amendment be awarded at this time. Additional fees will be used for additional projects which include remodels, tenant improvements, additions, modernization, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing upgrades, and code-related improvements. Projects may also include investigations, studies, and reports. Some of the anticipated projects include those identified in the County's FLIP projects under the recent budget allocation for capital projects and deferred maintenance. Having this as-needed agreement in place will allow the design phase to commence sooner and provide for a shorter project completion schedule. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, projects currently in process will be delayed, which will ultimately result in higher project costs. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 557 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract Amendment Agreement #22-939-27 with the Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano, a non-profit corporation, effective July 1, 2016, to amend Contract #22-939-26, to increase the payment limit by $62,986, from $61,823 to a new payment limit of $124,809, with no change in the original term from March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: This amendment is funded 100% Ryan White HIV Treatment Modernization Act. (No Rate increase) BACKGROUND: In May, 2015, the County Administrator approved and Purchasing Manager executed Contract #22-939-26 with Food Bank of Contra Costa County and Solano for the period from March 1, 2016 through February 28, 2017, for the coordination of food services for County residents diagnosed with HIV and their families. Approval of Contract #22-939-27 will allow the Contractor to provide additional coordination of food services to County residents with HIV, through February 28, 2017. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dan Peddycord, 313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, M Wilhelm C. 67 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Contract Amendment Agreement #22-939-27 with the Food Bank of Contra Costa County AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 558 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this amendment is not approved, Contractor will not be able to provide sufficient protein and fresh produce to the existing caseload of County residents who are diagnosed with HIV. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 559 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #26-891-1 with Pro Transport-1 LLC, a limited liability company, in an amount not to exceed $225,000, to provide non-emergency patient transportation services for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Health Centers for the period from June 1, 2016 through May 31, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% Hospital Enterprise I. (rate increase) BACKGROUND: This Contractor provides non-emergency ambulance transportation services, for patients of Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, including all holidays. The patients are transported to County-specified destinations. On December 5, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-891 with Pro Transport-1 LLC, a limited liability company, to provide non-emergency patient transportation services for Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC) and Health APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: J Pigg, M Wilhelm C. 71 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Contract #26-891-1 with Pro Transport-1, LLC AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 560 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Centers for the period from July 1, 2015 through May 31, 2016. Approval of Contract #26-891-1, will allow the Contractor to continue to provide non-emergency ambulance transportation services for patients at CCRMC and Health Centers, through May 31, 2017. This Contract includes changes to the County’s Standard General Conditions, Paragraphs 16, Confidentiality of Information and 19, Insurance. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County patients will not receive transportation services from this Contractor. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 561 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #26-958-12 with Muir Orthopaedic Specialists, a Medical Group, Inc., a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $225,000 for the provision of orthopaedic services for patients at Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Contra Costa Health Centers (CCRMC), for the period from August 1, 2016 through July 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: Funded 100% Hospital Enterprise I Funds. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On August 6, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #26-958-11, Muir Orthopaedic Specialists, a Medical Group, Inc. to provide orthopaedic services for CCRMC including but not limited to; clinic coverage, on-call, consultation, training, and surgical procedures for the period from August 1, 2013 through July 31, 2016. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Samir Shah, M.D., 370-5525 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 58 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Contract #26-958-12 with Muir Orthopaedic Specialists AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 562 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Contract #26-958-12 will allow Contractor to continue to provide orthopaedic services through July 31, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, patients requiring orthopaedic services at CCRMC will not have access to Contractor’s services. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 563 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #27-456-10 with La Clinica De La Raza, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $1,500,000, to provide Primary Care and Ophthalmology Services to Contra Costa Health Plan (CCHP) members for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% Contra Costa Health Plan Enterprise Fund II. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: On June 9, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #27-456-8 with La Clinica De La Raza for the provision of Primary Care and Ophthalmology services, for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016. Approval of Contract #27-456-10 will allow Contractor to continue providing Primary Care and Ophthalmology services through June 30, 2017. This contract includes modification to the County’s Standard General Conditions Paragraph 1. (Compliance with Law), Paragraph 2. (Inspections), Paragraph 19, (Insurance) and Paragraph 5. (Termination and Cancellation). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Patricia Tanquary, 313-6004 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: A Floyd, M Wilhelm C. 70 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Contract #27-456-10 with La Clinica De La Raza AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 564 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, certain specialized professional health care services for its members under the terms of their Individual and Group Health Plan membership contract with the County will not be provided. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: NOT APPLICABLE AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 565 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Contract #74-495-1 with Berkeley Youth Alternatives, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $100,066, to provide school-based mental health services to seriously emotionally disturbed children, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. This Contract includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017, in an amount not to exceed $50,033. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 50% Federal Financial Participation and 50% County Realignment. (Rate Increase) (3% Cost of Living Adjustment [COLA]) BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing state-mandated school-based mental health services to seriously emotionally disturbed students, and their families. On July 28, 2015 the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-495 with Berkeley Youth Alternatives for the provision of school-based mental health services for seriously emotionally disturbed students in Alameda County, who reside in Contra Costa County, for the period from APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon, 957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 63 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Contract #74-495-1 with Berkeley Youth Alternatives AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 566 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, which includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2016. Approval of Contract #74-495-1 replaces the automatic extension under the prior contract and will allow the Contractor to continue to provide school-based mental health services for seriously emotionally disturbed students through June 30, 2017. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, County residents will not receive services provided by this Contractor. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 567 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #22-219-58 with Compass Group USA, Inc. (dba Bateman Community Living), a corporation, in an amount not to exceed $2,704,537, to provide meal services for the County’s Senior Nutrition Program for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. ?Approval of Novation Contract #22–219-58 replaces the automatic extension under the prior contact and will allow the Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2017. This Contract includes modifications to County’s standard indemnification clause and General Conditions. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is 100% federally funded, under Title III C 1 and Title III C 2 of the Federal Older Americans Act of 1965. No County funds are required. (Rate Increase) BACKGROUND: This Contractor was selected to provide meals for the Senior Nutrition APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: A Floyd , M Wilhelm C. 68 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Novation Contract #22–219–58 with Compass Group USA, Inc. (dba Bateman Community Living) AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 568 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Program through a competitive bid process conducted by the County’s Public Works Department (Purchasing). This Contract meets the social needs of the County’s population. Contractor will provide prepackaged, frozen meals, on 249 County-designated serving days, for elderly, disabled, and AIDS/HIV diagnosed citizens of Contra Costa County. On July 21, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #22–219–56 (as amended by Contract Amendment #22-219-57) with Compass Group USA, Inc. (dba Compass Group Foodservice), now known as Compass Group USA, Inc. (dba Bateman Community Living), for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, with a three-month automatic extension through September 30, 2016, for the provision of meal services for the County’s Senior Nutrition Program. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, the elderly, disabled, and AIDS/HIV diagnosed citizens of Contra Costa County participating in the Senior Nutrition Program may not receive the appropriate meals or nutrition. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 569 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #24-778-25 with Uplift Family Services., a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $462,382, to provide mental health services to Seriously Emotionally Disturbed (SED) children, including school- and community-based services, and Therapeutic Behavioral Services (TBS) for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. This Contract includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017, in an amount not to exceed $228,691. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 49% Federal Financial Participation 50% County Mental Health Realignment and 1% by Mt. Diablo Unified School District. (No rate increase) BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing a variety of mental health services to SED children at schools located within Mt. Diablo Unified School District as well TBS for County-referred children in need of short-term behavioral APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon, 957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: D Morgan, M Wilhelm C. 55 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Novation Contract #24-778-25 with Uplift Family Services AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 570 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) intervention. On November 17, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #24-778-24 with FamiliesFirst, Inc., now known as Uplift Family Services, for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2016, for the provision of mental health services to SED children including school- and community-based services, day treatment and TBS. Approval of Novation Contract #24-778-25 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows Uplift Family Services to provide services through June 30, 2017. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, SED children will not receive the mental health services as needed and will experience out of County and out of State placement. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 571 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #74–375–7 with Rainbow Community Center of Contra Costa County, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $227,120, to provide Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) services for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. This Contract includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017, in an amount not to exceed $113,560. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% Mental Health Services Act. (Rate increase) (3% Cost of Living Adjustment [COLA]). BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of County’s population by providing a community-based social support program designed to decrease isolation, depression and suicidal ideation among members of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Questioning (LGBTQ) community residing in Contra Costa County. On July 7, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74–375-6 APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon, 957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: K Cyr, M Wilhelm C. 59 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Novation Contract #74-375-7 with Rainbow Community Center of Contra Costa County AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 572 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) with Rainbow Community Center of Contra Costa County, located in Concord, for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2016, for the provision of MHSA PEI services. Approval of Novation Contract #74–375–7 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract, and allows Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2017. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, Contractor will not provide outreach and community engagement events, support groups, in-services, and counseling to the LGBTQ community and their families. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 573 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #74–218–14 with Desarrollo Familiar, Inc., a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $365,342, to provide school and community based mental health services for Latino children and their families, for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. This Contract includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017, in an amount not to exceed $182,671. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 50% Federal Financial Participation; 50% State Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) (3% Cost of Living Adjustment [COLA]) (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing school and community-based mental health services, including assessments, individual, group, and family counseling, medication support, case management, outreach and crisis intervention services to an underserved Latino population in West Contra Costa County, which will result in greater home, community, and school success. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon, 957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: E Suisala, M Wilhelm C. 72 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Novation Contract #74–218–14 with Desarrollo Familiar, Inc. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 574 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) In October 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Novation Contract #74–218–13 with Desarrollo Familiar, Inc. for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2016, for the provision of school and community based mental health services for Latino children and their families. Approval of Novation Contract #74–218–14 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows the Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2017. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, Spanish-speaking children in West Contra Costa County will have reduced access to school and community-based mental health services and may require higher levels of service. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Children Ready For and Succeeding in School”; “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include an increase in positive social and emotional development as measured by the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS). AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 575 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Novation Contract #74-414-6 with Young Men’s Business Association of the East Bay, a non-profit corporation, in an amount not to exceed $97,000, to provide Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) services to multi-cultural youth through the James Morehouse Project for the period from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. This Contract includes a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2017, in an amount not to exceed $48,500. FISCAL IMPACT: This Contract is funded 100% Mental Health Services Act (MHSA). (3% Cost of Living Adjustment [COLA]) (Rate increase) BACKGROUND: This Contract meets the social needs of the County’s population by providing improved access to health care, education, mental health and suicide prevention to multi-cultural youth from diverse households in the Iron Triangle neighborhood of Richmond. On July 7, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #74-414-5 with Young Men’s Christian Association of the East Bay, for the period from July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016, which included a six-month automatic extension through December 31, 2016, for the provision of MHSA PEI services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Cynthia Belon, 957-5201 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: E Suisala, M Wilhelm C. 61 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Novation Contract #74–414-6 with Young Men’s Business Association of the East Bay AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 576 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) Approval of Novation Contract #74-414-6 replaces the automatic extension under the prior Contract and allows Contractor to continue providing services through June 30, 2017, including modifications to County’s standard indemnification provision. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this contract is not approved, Residents of Richmond’s Iron Triangle will not receive the PEI services to influence factors that bear upon the healthy development and education of children from the community and improve community participation in education and health promotion, health protection, and violence prevention efforts. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: This MHSA-PEI program supports the following Board of Supervisors’ community outcomes: “Families that are Safe, Stable, and Nurturing”; and “Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families”. Expected program outcomes include increases in social connectedness, communication skills, parenting skills, and knowledge of the human service system in Contra Costa County. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 577 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Auditor-Controller, or his designee, to pay $126,881.26 to California Ambulance for non-emergency transportation services rendered to patients of the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers during the period January 9, 2012 through June 30, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I budget. BACKGROUND: California Ambulance provides non-emergency transportation services to patients of the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC). On December 15, 2015, the Board of Supervisors approved payment in the amount of $90,669.92 to California Ambulance for non-emergency transportation services rendered to patients of the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers during the period October 1, 2013 through June 30, 2015. This was done with the understanding that an additional payment request would be submitted to the Board for the period January 9, 2012 through September 30, 2013 once an internal review of the claims received for services rendered during APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Anna Roth, 370-5101 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: Tasha Scott, M Wilhelm C. 65 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Payments for Services Provided by California Ambulance AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 578 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) this time period was completed. Prior to completing our internal review of these older claims, Contra Costa Emergency Medical Services reported that a former employee of California Ambulance was listed on the Medi-Cal Suspended and Ineligible Provider List (S&I List) published by the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS). On March 10, 2016, the Compliance Office notified California Ambulance that any future payments would be placed on hold until the County determined the amount California Ambulance had charged for the services provided by the suspended and ineligible provider. Our review indicates that there are outstanding invoices from California Ambulance in the amount of $165,868. The Compliance Office has determined that the amount paid California Ambulance for services provided by the suspended, ineligible provider is $38,986.74, leaving a balance due of $126,881.26. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If payment is not authorized, California Ambulance will not be paid for the non-emergency transportation services rendered to patients of the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center and Health Centers. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 579 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent, on behalf of the Health Services Department, to execute a purchase order with the Office of the Statewide Health Planning and Development in the amount of $136,639 for the payment of the Hospital/Long Term Care Special Assessment Fee for FY 2016/2017, for the Contra Costa Regional Medical Center (CCRMC). The Special Fee is Based on the Annual Disclosure Report. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% funding is included in the Hospital Enterprise Fund I budget. BACKGROUND: Health and Safety Code Section 127280 requires health facilities to pay the annual special fee assessment to the Office of the Statewide Health Planning and Development. The fee provides funding for the Office’s health planning functions and health facility data collection and disclosure activities. The assessment rate for the Hospital for the 2016/2017 fiscal year is .027 %. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Jose Reyes, 957-5414 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: T Scott, M Wilhelm, J Reyes C. 69 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Purchase Order with Office of the Statewide Health Planning and Development AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 580 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this Purchase Order is not approved, it could result in the withholding of the CCRMC’s license as provided by Health and Safety Code Section 127280 (i) (2). CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No impact ATTACHMENTS Office of the Statewide AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 581 AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES582 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Employment and Human Services Director, or designee, to execute a contract with Bay Area Community Resources, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $621,000 for Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Out-of-School Youth Services for the period of July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. (100% Federal) FISCAL IMPACT: $621,000.00: 100% Federal (Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act) BACKGROUND: This contract was awarded through Request for Proposal (RFP) 1134 for provision of comprehensive Workforce Innovation & Opportunity Act (WIOA) youth development services to eligible out-of-school youth ages 16-24 in West and East Contra Costa County. WIOA defines the nation’s job training system and provides guidance for local workforce investment systems designed to increase the employment, retention and earnings of participants, and increase occupational skill attainment by participants. BACR will provide comprehensive workforce training, placement and wraparound services to 105 out-of-school APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Gina Chenoweth 3-1648 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 56 To:Board of Supervisors From:Kathy Gallagher, Employment & Human Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with Bay Area Community Resources, Inc. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 583 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) youth in East and West County. BACR will provide both educational and workforce development strategies that assist youth in returning to and completing high school, and prepare disconnected youth for ongoing education and training, long-term careers and entry into the workplace. BACR will connect with partners from postsecondary institutions to provide pathways to provide pathways to postsecondary education and training, enabling youth to earn a degree and/or an industry-recognized certification or credential in a high growth occupation. (18-357-2) CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Out-of-school youth in East and West Contra Costa County will not receive valuable assistance in overcoming barriers to employment, job readiness, educational programs, or career training. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: The services provided under this contract support all five of Contra Costa County’s community outcomes: (1) "Children Ready for and Succeeding in School"; (2) "Children and Youth Healthy and Preparing for Productive Adulthood"; (3)"Families that are Economically Self-Sufficient"; (4) "Families that are Safe, Stable and Nurturing"; and (5)"Communities that are Safe and Provide a High Quality of Life for Children and Families” by training and providing employment opportunities for youth. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 584 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Risk Management to execute an agreement with BSI EHS Services and Solutions for on-site environmental health and safety and sustainability consulting support effective July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017 in an amount not to exceed $1,202,600. FISCAL IMPACT: Costs will be funded through the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund and through direct charges to user departments. BACKGROUND: BSI EHS Services and Solutions (BSI) consists of staff possessing specialized technical skills in areas such as indoor air quality, infectious disease control, industrial hygiene, as well as general and environmental compliance. Consulting services also assist in dealing with Occupational Safety Health Administration (OSHA) compliance inspections and responses on behalf of County departments. BSI safety specialists assist with facility and program assessments requested by Departments, ergonomic and air quality investigations, development and distribution of federal and state required safety and training tools, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharon Hymes-Offord 925.335.1450 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 66 To:Board of Supervisors From:Sharon Offord Hymes, Risk Manager Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with BSI EHS Services and Solutions AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 585 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) continuous training of loss control coordinators, implementation of safety/loss control programs for Departments, responses to requests for research and interpretation of federal, state and local health and safety regulations and on-site First AID/CPR/AED Training. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The County will not be able to ensure that it meets Cal-OSHA regulatory requirements. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 586 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Interim County Probation Officer, or designee, to execute a contract with STAND! For Families Free of Violence in the amount of $107,238 to provide parenting training for participants ages 14-25 who are involved with the criminal justice system, for the period of July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: $107,238; 100% State Proud Parenting Grant Program. Funding for Parenting Training is received from the Proud Parenting Grant awarded by the Board of State and Community Corrections and will not require any General Funds. BACKGROUND: In June 2016 the Contra Costa County Probation Department applied to the Board of State and Community Corrections for funds to continue facilitation of Proud Parenting Programs for young fathers and mothers involved in the criminal justice system, for the period July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2017. The Department was successful in its application and will now enter into a contract with STAND! to continue services for youth ages 14-25 involved in the criminal justice system. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Probation Department will be unable to contract with STAND! For Families Free of Violence for Proud Parenting services. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Danielle Fokkema, 925-313-4195 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 57 To:Board of Supervisors From:Todd Billeci, Interim County Probation Officer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with STAND! for Families Free of Violence AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 587 CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Services provided will improve the quality of life for youth in the juvenile justice system and their children and provide a service to which they might not otherwise have access. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 588 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Director of Risk Management to execute a contract with TCS Risk Management Services to administer a county-wide ergonomic program effective July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2019 in an amount not to exceed $591,000. FISCAL IMPACT: Costs for preventative evaluations and equipment will be charged directly to the Departments. Costs for administration of the ergonomic program will be paid from the Workers' Compensation Internal Service Fund. BACKGROUND: TCS Risk Management Services provides review and administration of ergonomic programs; employee ergonomic evaluations; installation of ergonomic equipment; discount pricing for equipment; training and coordination with departments; timely delivery of ergonomic evaluations and equipment to prevent or reduce the level of injuries sustained by employees. The results are savings in workers' compensation claims. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sharon Hymes-Offord 925.335.1453 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 52 To:Board of Supervisors From:Sharon Offord Hymes, Risk Manager Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Contract with TCS Risk Management Services AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 589 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: This program, including the ergonomics laboratory and equipment, will not be available to meet the County's needs and satisfy current regulations. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 590 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Purchasing Agent or designee to execute, on behalf of the Chief Information Officer, a purchase order with Dell Marketing, L.P., in an amount not to exceed $174,212 for the purchase of Dell servers, storage equipment and support to replace the existing aged Geographic Information System (GIS) servers. FISCAL IMPACT: 100% County General Fund. The Enterprise GIS servers for the Contra Costa County GIS program will be funded from the GIS budget. BACKGROUND: The new Enterprise level Geographic Information System (GIS) servers will replace the County’s legacy GIS servers that are currently 10+ years old. Maintenance agreements from vendors do not exist for the obsolete GIS servers at their end-of-use life cycle. The Enterprise GIS has become an important and vital tool for a wide variety of departments and applications within Contra Costa County. Since the inception of the GIS program, there has been a reduction in redundancy across departments, improved efficiency with staff, increased availability of information within the County and to the public. At its core, GIS is the combination of graphical maps with tabular information (such as databases). It provides a tool to assist with solving real-world problems. This tool allows visualization and analysis of spatial information in ways not previously possible. The County is purchasing the servers and support from Dell through its Dell National Association of State Procurement Officials (NASPO) Master Agreement and Participating Addendum between Dell Marketing, L.P. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Ed Woo (925) 383-2688 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 51 To:Board of Supervisors From:Ed Woo, Chief Information Officer Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Purchase Order with Dell for New GIS Servers and Storage Vault AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 591 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) and the State of California. Dell sells products and services like the GIS servers and support by using its NASPO Master Agreement and Addendum pricing and terms and conditions. The County, as a political subdivision of the State of California, is a permitted user of the Dell NASPO Master Agreement and Addendum for pricing and terms and conditions. In accordance with Administrative Bulletin No 611.0, County Departments are required to obtain Board approval for single item purchases over $100,000. The County Administrator's Office has reviewed and recommends approval. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: This equipment order will replace the current server hardware, which is at the end of factory support. Any hardware failures will not be repaired and, therefore, may negatively impact the GIS application availability. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 592 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $200,000 to provide toxicology screening services for the period of September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2018. FISCAL IMPACT: $200,000. Offset by client fees. Budgeted. BACKGROUND: Contra Costa County provides through its Office of the Sheriff, Custody Alternative Program, an alternative to jail time if the offender qualifies. Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inc., provides drug, alcohol and other toxicology screening services for the County to determine if the offenders meet the program qualifications and can remain in the program once admitted to it. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The Sheriff's Office will not have access to a third party vendor for the provision of drug, alcohol and other toxicology screening services on an as needed basis. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No impact. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sandra Brown, 925-335-1553 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 75 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Redwood Toxicology Laboratory, Inc. - Toxicology Screening AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 593 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Conservation and Development Department Director, or designee, to execute a contract amendment with First Carbon Solutions, to increase the payment limit by $24,200 to a new payment limit of $333,039 with no change to the original term of September 10, 2014 through September 9, 2018, for services required to prepare the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Tassajara Parks Project in the Tassajara Valley (San Ramon area). FISCAL IMPACT: No impact to the General Fund. The applicant is responsible for the payment of additional services. BACKGROUND: The Department of Conservation and Development contracted with First Carbon Solutions in September of 2014 to prepare an EIR for the Tassajara Parks project. The project involves a 125 unit residential subdivision and includes substantial dedication of park land in the Tassajara Valley / San Ramon area. The project requires approval of a General Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Subdivision and Development Plan applications. First Carbon Solutions has been working on the EIR and identified additional analysis necessary to complete the Draft EIR. Staff concurred that it was necessary to evaluate additional water supply options for the project as well as to provide additional traffic impact analysis. As a result, the level of effort changed to include additional analysis of a recycled water pipeline and traffic impacts in order to complete the Draft EIR. The increased payment limit is necessary to cover the additional work. This is the third budget amendment; the second budget amendment was approved by the Board on January 5, 2016. There is no change to the term of the contract which is valid until September 9, 2018. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: John Oborne 925-674-7793 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 53 To:Board of Supervisors From:John Kopchik, Director, Conservation & Development Department Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Tassajara Parks EIR Contract Amendment AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 594 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the Board does not authorize the EIR contract amendment, there would not be enough funds for First Carbon Solutions to complete the EIR. ATTACHMENTS AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 595 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Sheriff-Coroner, or designee, to execute a contract with Vislink, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $245,000 for the purchase of equipment, installation and support for a downlink system for the Sheriff's helicopters for the period August 1, 2016 through July 31, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT: $238,531, of which will be obtained from the FY2015 Urban Area Security Initiative(UASI)funds granted by the Department of Homeland Security through the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services. No required match. BACKGROUND: The Sheriff’s Office intends to use the funds awarded by the Urban Areas Security Initiative (UASI) FY 2015 grant project to execute a contract with Vislink, Inc. for the purchase of airborne digital downlink equipment and installation services for one of the Sheriff’s Office helicopters (STARR 3). The downlink equipment will be able to send digital video and images from the aircraft to additional fixed antenna receiving site(s) strategically placed throughout the county to provide a highly reliable video downlink transmit, receive, and distribution solution compatible with existing equipment already installed in Sheriff’s Office assets (Mobile Command Vehicle and STARR 1). APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Sandra Brown 925-335-1553 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Chris Heck, Deputy cc: C. 62 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Vislink, Inc. contract AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 596 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: A negative action on this agenda item will cause the Office of the Sheriff to lose the grant funding and not be able to enhance on the already installed equipment on the Sheriff’s Office assets. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: None. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 597 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Unpaid Student Training Agreement #22-667-4 with the University of Southern California, an educational institution, to provide supervised field instruction in the County’s Public Health Division to physical and occupational therapist students, for the period from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: The purpose of this agreement is to provide University of Southern California, physical and occupational therapist students with the opportunity to integrate academic knowledge with applied skills at progressively higher levels of performance and responsibility. Supervised fieldwork experience for students is considered to be an integral part of both educational and professional preparation. The Health Services Department can provide the requisite field education, APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: D Morgan, M Wilhelm C. 80 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve University of Southern Californian Unpaid Student Training Agreement #22-667-4 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 598 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) while at the same time, benefitting from the students’ services to patients. On February 4, 2014, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #22-667-3 with University of Southern California for the provision of supervised fieldwork instruction experience with Health Services, for the period from September 1, 2013 through August 31, 2016. Approval of Unpaid Student Training Agreement #22-667-4, will allow University of Southern California, physical and occupational therapist students to receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience, in County’s Public Health Division, through August 31, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved, the students will not receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience in the County’s Public Health Division. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 599 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or his designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Unpaid Student Training Agreement #22-471-6 with Board of Trustees of California State University on behalf of California State University, East Bay, an educational institution, to provide supervised field instruction in County’s Public Health Division to community engagement, health care administration, nursing & health science, recreation, social work, speech-language/audiology & hearing students, for the period from August 1, 2016 through July 31, 2019. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: The purpose of this agreement is to provide Board of Trustees of California State University on behalf of California State University, East Bay, community engagement, health care administration, nursing & health science, recreation, social work, speech-language/audiology & hearing students with the opportunity to integrate academic knowledge with applied skills at progressively higher levels of performance and responsibility. Supervised fieldwork experience APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Dan Peddycord, 313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: D Morgan, M Wilhelm C. 77 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Unpaid Student Training Agreement #22-471-6 with Board of Trustees of California State University AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 600 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) for students is considered to be an integral part of both educational and professional preparation. The Health Services Department can provide the requisite field education, while at the same time, benefitting from the students’ services to patients. On February 26, 2013, the Board of Supervisors approved Contract #22-471-5 with Board of Trustees of California State University on behalf of California State University, East Bay for the provision of supervised fieldwork instruction experience with Health Services, for the period from August 1, 2013 through July 31, 2016. Approval of Unpaid Student Training Agreement #22-471-6, will allow Board of Trustees of California State University on behalf of California State University, East Bay students to receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience in the County’s Public Health Division through July 31, 2019. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved, the students will not receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience in the County’s Public Health Division. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not Applicable AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 601 RECOMMENDATION(S): APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Health Services Director, or designee, to execute, on behalf of the County, Unpaid Student Training Agreement #22-964-3 with San Jose State University, an educational institution, to provide supervised field instruction in the County’s Public Health Division to occupational therapy students, for the period from September 1, 2016 through August 31, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: The purpose of this agreement is to provide occupational therapy students from San Jose State University with the opportunity to integrate academic knowledge with applied skills at progressively higher levels of performance and responsibility. Supervised fieldwork experience for students is considered to be an integral part of both educational and professional preparation. The Health Services Department can provide the requisite field education, while at the same time, benefit from the students’ services to patients. On September 10, 2013, the Board APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Daniel Peddycord, 313-6712 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: D Morgan, M Wilhelm C. 76 To:Board of Supervisors From:William Walker, M.D., Health Services Director Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Approve Unpaid Student Training Agreement #22-964-3 with San Jose State University AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 602 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) of Supervisors approved Contract #22-964-2 with San Jose State University for the provision of supervised fieldwork instruction experience with Health Services, for the period from September 1, 2013 through August 31, 2016. Approval of Unpaid Student Training Agreement #22-964-3, will allow San Jose State University students to receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience, in the County’s Public Health Division, through August 31, 2021. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If this agreement is not approved, the students will not receive supervised fieldwork instruction experience in County’s Public Health Division. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: Not applicable. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 603 RECOMMENDATION(S): CONTINUE the emergency action originally taken by the Board of Supervisors on November 16, 1999 regarding the issue of homelessness in Contra Costa County. FISCAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 8630 required that, for a body that meets weekly, the need to continue the emergency declaration be reviewed at least every 14 days until the local emergency is terminated. In no event is the review to take place more than 21 days after the previous review. On November 16, 1999, the Board of Supervisors declared a local emergency, pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 8630 on homelessness in Contra Costa County. With the continuing high number of homeless individuals and insufficient funding available to assist in sheltering all homeless individuals and families, it is appropriate for APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Enid Mendoza, (925) 335-1039 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 83 To:Board of Supervisors From:David Twa, County Administrator Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Continue Extension of Emergency Declaration Regarding Homelessness AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 604 BACKGROUND: (CONT'D) the Board to continue the declaration of a local emergency regarding homelessness. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 605 RECOMMENDATION(S): SET the special tax levy for police services in County Service Areas P-2 (Zones A and B) and P-5 for Fiscal Year 2016-2017 as follows: P-2 Zone A (Blackhawk): Single residential: $ 280 per parcel, per year Small multiple residential: $ 280 per parcel, per year APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Liz Arbuckle, (925) 335-1529 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Liz Arbuckle, Heike Anderson, Tim Ewell C. 81 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Setting Special Tax Levy for County Service Areas P-2 Zone A (Blackhawk), P-2 Zone B (Alamo) and P-5 (Round Hill) AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 606 RECOMMENDATION(S): (CONT'D) Large multiple residential: $ 280 per parcel, per year Commercial/Industrial/Institutional:$ 1,680 per parcel, per year Commercial/Theater: $ 8,400 per parcel, per year P-2 Zone B (Alamo): Single residential: $ 18 per parcel, per year Small multiple residential: $ 27 per parcel, per year Large multiple residential: $ 36 per parcel, per year Commercial/Industrial/ Institutional:$ 54 per parcel, per year P-5 (Round Hill) Commercial recreational: $ 792 per parcel, per year All other: $ 330 per parcel, per year FISCAL IMPACT: There is no impact on the County General Fund. BACKGROUND: The above action for County Service Area P-2 Zone A is required by County Ordinance No. 95-55, as amended by County Ordinance No. 2005-09. The rates are the same as those in effect for Fiscal Year 2015-2016. Setting the special tax levy for police services will permit the Sheriff to continue to provide police services in the Blackhawk Area. It is estimated that the special tax levy will raise $721,000 for Fiscal Year 2016-2017. The above action for County Service Area P-2 Zone B is required by County Ordinance No. 81-16. The rates are the same as those in effect for Fiscal Year 2015-2016. Setting the special tax levy for police services will permit the Sheriff to continue to provide police services in the Alamo area. It is estimated that the special tax levy will raise approximately $64,000 for Fiscal Year 2016-2017. The above action for County Service Area P-5 is required by County Ordinance No. 2000-38. The rates are the same as those in effect for Fiscal Year 2015-2016. Parcels not used for commercial recreational purposes will have a special tax levy of $330. The rate for parcels used for commercial recreational purposes is set at $792, which is 240% of the levy for parcels not used for commercial recreational purposes, as required by Article III(1)(b) of the ordinance. Setting the special tax levy for police services will permit the Sheriff to continue to provide police services in the Round Hill area. It is estimated that the special tax levy will raise approximately $255,000 for Fiscal Year 2016-2017. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The special tax levy will not be authorized by the Board of Supervisors resulting in the tax not being included on the 2016/17 Property Tax Roll. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No impact. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 607 RECOMMENDATION(S): SET the special tax levy for police services Zones in County Service Area P-6 for Fiscal Year 2016-2017 as set forth in Exhibit A. FISCAL IMPACT: It is estimated the department will receive $1.9 million cumulative revenue for all zones within County Service Area (CSA) P-6 in fiscal year 2016/17. This amount reflects a 2.7% increase from the fiscal year 2015/16 cumulative amount of approximately $1.85 million. Revenue from the zones within CSA P-6 is adjusted annually based on the April Urban Area Consumer Price Index (CPI-U) for the San Francisco Bay Area. BACKGROUND: The above action fixes the tax rates per parcel in the P-6 Zones as outlined in their respective ordinances. In July of each calendar year, the Board of Supervisors sets the special tax levy for parcels in each CSA P-6 zone based on the April CPI-U indicator released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) as discussed in the fiscal impact section. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Liz Arbuckle, (925) 335-1529 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: Liz Arbuckle, Heike Anderson, Tim Ewell C. 82 To:Board of Supervisors From:David O. Livingston, Sheriff-Coroner Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Setting Special Tax Levy for County Service Areas P-6 Zones AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 608 CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The special tax levy will not be authorized by the Board of Supervisors, and the taxes will not be included on the 2016/2017 Property Tax Roll. CHILDREN'S IMPACT STATEMENT: No impact. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A FY 2016-17 - CSA P-6 Zones and involved Ordinances Exhibit A FY 2016-17 - Special Tax Levies for CSA P-6 Zones AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 609 Attachment A Office of the Sheriff‐Coroner FY 2016/17 County Service Area P‐6 Zones, Special Tax Levy Zone Number and Involved Ordinance Zone 200 Ord. No. 89‐44 Zone 1504 Ord. No. 97‐43 Zone 2501 Ord. No. 99‐39 Zone 201 Ord. No. 93‐45 Zone 1505 Ord. No. 98‐37 Zone 2502 Ord. No. 00‐37 Zone 202 Ord. No. 95‐60 Zone 1506 Ord. No. 98‐29 Zone 2503 Ord. No. 08‐06 Zone 203 Ord. No. 03‐29 Zone 1507 Ord. No. 01‐15 Zone 2600 Ord. No. 95‐12 Zone 204 Ord. No. 04‐12 Zone 1509 Ord. No. 01‐22 Zone 2601 Ord. No. 93‐81 Zone 205 Ord. No. 04‐37 Zone 1510 Ord. No. 02‐11 Zone 2602 Ord. No. 03‐25 Zone 206 Ord. No. 06‐07 Zone 1511 Ord. No. 02‐14 Zone 2603 Ord. No. 04‐41 Zone 207 Ord. No. 06‐23 Zone 1512 Ord. No. 06‐08 Zone 2604 Ord. No. 06‐68 Zone 208 Ord. No. 06‐38 Zone 1513 Ord. No. 07‐03 Zone 2605 Ord. No. 07‐12 Zone 209 Ord. No. 06‐67 Zone 1514 Ord. No. 15‐07 Zone 2700 Ord. No. 93‐44 Zone 210 Ord. No. 06‐69 Zone 1600 Ord. No. 94‐06 Zone 2701 Ord. No. 95‐04 Zone 211 Ord. No. 08‐21 Zone 1601 Ord. No. 95‐25 Zone 2702 Ord. No. 97‐40 Zone 301 Ord. No. 04‐42 Zone 1602 Ord. No. 95‐10 Zone 2703 Ord. No. 05‐13 Zone 400 Ord. No. 96‐12 Zone 1603 Ord. No. 95‐40 Zone 2704 Ord. No. 06‐03 Zone 500 Ord. No. 94‐18 Zone 1604 Ord. No. 96‐23 Zone 2800 Ord. No. 99‐41 Zone 501 Ord. No. 99‐30 Zone 1605 Ord. No. 97‐20 Zone 2801 Ord. No. 00‐16 Zone 502 Ord. No. 01‐12 Zone 1606 Ord. No. 97‐26 Zone 2900 Ord. No. 94‐50 Zone 503 Ord. No. 03‐06 Zone 1607 Ord. No. 98‐12 Zone 2901 Ord. No. 96‐15 Zone 504 Ord. No. 04‐21 Zone 1609 Ord. No. 99‐38 Zone 2902 Ord. No. 01‐01 Zone 700 Ord. No. 94‐12 Zone 1610 Ord. No. 99‐34 Zone 3000 Ord. No. 95‐26 Zone 701 Ord. No. 96‐16 Zone 1611 Ord. No. 99‐33 Zone 3001 Ord. No. 04‐34 Zone 702 Ord. No. 96‐22 Zone 1612 Ord. No. 99‐42 Zone 3002 Ord. No. 06‐41 Zone 900 Ord. No. 02‐18 Zone 1613 Ord. No. 00‐28 Zone 3003 Ord. No. 07‐04 Zone 1000 Ord. No. 94‐19 Zone 1614 Ord. No. 01‐14 Zone 3004 Ord. No. 07‐05 Zone 1001 Ord. No. 98‐17 Zone 1615 Ord. No. 02‐10 Zone 3100 Ord. No. 96‐17 Zone 1002 Ord. No. 03‐27 Zone 1616 Ord. No. 06‐02 Zone 3101 Ord. No. 01‐24 Zone 1003 Ord. No. 04‐02 Zone 1700 Ord. No. 98‐20 Zone 3102 Ord. No. 02‐21 Zone 1004 Ord. No. 05‐11 Zone 1800 Ord. No. 95‐11 Zone 3103 Ord. No. 03‐07 Zone 1005 Ord. No. 06‐15 Zone 1801 Ord. No. 95‐50 Zone 3104 Ord. No. 04‐29 Zone 1006 Ord. No. 06‐42 Zone 1803 Ord. No. 98‐47 Zone 3105 Ord. No. 06‐01 Zone 1100 Ord. No. 94‐07 Zone 1804 Ord. No. 01‐08 Zone 3106 Ord. No. 06‐24 Zone 1101 Ord. No. 99‐21 Zone 2000 Ord. No. 98‐30 Zone 3107 Ord. No. 06‐27 Zone 1200 Ord. No. 95‐45 Zone 2200 Ord. No. 99‐53 Zone 3108 Ord. No. 07‐13 Zone 1201 Ord. No. 03‐35 Zone 2201 Ord. No. 00‐02 Zone 3109 Ord. No. 07‐38 Zone 1500 Ord. No. 95‐24 Zone 2202 Ord. No. 04‐35 Zone 3110 Ord. No. 07‐39 Zone 1501 Ord. No. 95‐49 Zone 2203 Ord. No. 04‐36 Zone 3112 Ord. No. 10‐05 Zone 1502 Ord. No. 96‐29 Zone 2300 Ord. No. 94‐69 Zone 1503 Ord. No. 98‐04 Zone 2500 Ord. No. 96‐14 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 610 Exhibit ASET the special tax levy for police services in County Service Area P‐6 for Fiscal Year 2016‐2017 as follows:Zone 200Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$202.47Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$404.89Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$809.80Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$1,214.69Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,619.60Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$809.80Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$1,214.69Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,619.60Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$404.89Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$404.89Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$809.80This zone is in its 27th year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special taxlevy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 201, 1000, 1600, 2700Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$178.79Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$357.56Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$715.15Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$1,072.71Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,430.28Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$715.15Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$1,072.71Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,430.28Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$357.56Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$357.56AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES611 Exhibit AMiscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$715.15These zones are in their 23rd year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 500, 700, 1100, 1500, 1601, 1800, 2300, 2600, 2601, 2900Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$174.67Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$349.30Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$698.63Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$1,047.93Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,397.23Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$698.63Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$1,047.93Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,397.23Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$349.30Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$349.30Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$698.63These zones are in their 22nd year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 202, 1501, 1602, 1603, 1604, 1801, 2701, 3000, 3100Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$171.94Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$343.86Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$687.72Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$1,031.59Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,375.45Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$687.72Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$1,031.59Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,375.45AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES612 Exhibit ALand (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$343.86Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$343.86Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$687.72These zones are in their 21st year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 400, 701, 702, 1200, 1502, 2500, 2901Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$165.80Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$331.57Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$663.19Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$994.79Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,326.39Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$663.19Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$994.79Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,326.39Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$331.57Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$331.57Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$663.19These zones are in their 20th year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing thespecial tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 1001, 1503, 1605, 1606Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$160.76Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$321.51Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$643.02Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$964.54Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,286.04Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$643.02AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES613 Exhibit ACommercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$964.54Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,286.04Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$321.51Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$321.51Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$643.02These zones are in their 19th year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 1504, 1505, 1506, 1607, 1700, 1803, 2000, 2702Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$153.67Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$307.31Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$614.64Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$921.96Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,229.28Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$614.64Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$921.96Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,229.28Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$307.31Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$307.32Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$614.64These zones are in their 18th year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 501, 1101, 1609, 1610, 1611, 1612, 2501, 2800Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$148.08Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$296.13Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$592.27Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$888.42Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,184.57AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES614 Exhibit ACommercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$592.27Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$888.42Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,184.57Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$296.13Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$296.13Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$592.27These zones are in their 17th year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 1613, 2200, 2201, 2801Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$139.93Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$279.84Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$559.71Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$839.57Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,119.42Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$559.71Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$839.57Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,119.42Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$279.84Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$279.84Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$559.71These zones are in their 16th year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 502, 1507, 1614, 1804, 2502, 2902Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$137.97Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$275.92Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$551.82AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES615 Exhibit AApartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$827.75Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,103.66Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$551.82Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$827.75Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,103.66Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$275.92Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$275.92Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$551.82These zones are in their 15th year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 900, 1509, 1510, 1511, 1615, 3101, 3102Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$135.42Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$270.82Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$541.67Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$812.49Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,083.32Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$541.67Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$812.49Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,083.32Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$270.82Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$270.82Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$541.67These zones are in their 14th year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 203, 204, 503, 1002, 1004, 2602, 3103Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$134.19AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES616 Exhibit ASingle, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$268.36Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$536.72Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$805.08Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,073.44Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$536.72Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$805.08Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,073.44Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$268.36Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$268.36Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$536.72These zones are in their 13th year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 504, 1003, 1201, 2202, 2203, 3001, 3104Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$130.68Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$261.33Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$522.68Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$784.01Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,045.34Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$522.68Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$784.01Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,045.34Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$261.33Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$261.33Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$522.68These zones are in their 12th year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 205, 301, 2603, 2703AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES617 Exhibit AVacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$126.56Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$253.08Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$506.18Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$759.26Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$1,012.35Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$506.18Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$759.26Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$1,012.35Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$253.08Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$253.08Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$506.18These zones are in their 11th year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 206, 207, 208, 209, 1005, 1006, 1512, 1616, 2704, 3002, 3105, 3106, 3107Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$122.44Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$244.88Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$489.72Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$734.58Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$979.45Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$489.72Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$734.58Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$979.45Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$244.88Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$244.88Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$489.72These zones are in their 10th year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES618 Exhibit AZones 210, 1513, 2604, 2605, 3003, 3004, 3108, 3109, 3110Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$117.51Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$235.00Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$469.98Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$704.98Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$939.98Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$469.98Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$704.98Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$939.98Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$235.00Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$235.00Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$469.98These zones are in their ninth year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zones 211, 2503Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$117.24Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$234.46Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$468.95Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$703.43Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$937.89Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$468.95Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$703.43Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$937.89Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$234.46Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$234.46Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$468.95AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES619 Exhibit AThese zones are in their eighth year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special tax levy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zone 3112Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$110.71Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$221.43Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$442.84Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$664.27Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$885.70Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$442.84Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$664.27Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$885.70Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$221.43Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$221.43Miscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$442.84This zone is in its fifth year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special taxlevy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.Zone 1514Vacant Lot (Use Codes 17‐18, 20, 30, 50)‐$100.00Single, small or large multiple residential (Use Codes 11‐16, 19, 21‐24, 29)‐$200.00Apartments 5 to 24 units (Use Codes 25‐26)‐$400.00Apartments 25 to 59 units (Use Code 27)‐$600.00Apartments 60+ units (Use Code 28)‐$800.00Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 33‐36, 38‐40, 43, 46‐49, 52‐54, 56, 70, 73‐75)‐$400.00Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 31‐32, 41, 44‐45, 55, 76)‐$600.00Commercial/Industrial/Institutional (Use Codes 37, 42, 51, 78)‐$800.00Land (Use Codes 61‐62)‐$200.00Miscellaneous (Use Codes 88‐89, 99)‐$200.00AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES620 Exhibit AMiscellaneous (Use Codes 85, 87)‐$400.00This zone is in its first year of levy.  Levy determined by the initial tax rates set in the County ordinance authorizing the special taxlevy (see Attachment A), property use codes, and changes in the Consumer Price Index.AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES621 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Treasurer’s Investment Policy for the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 as revised and adopted on May 17, 2016 by the Treasury Oversight Committee. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Government Code Section 27133, at the May 17, 2016 Treasury Oversight Committee meeting, the Committee approved and recommended the acceptance of the attached revised policy. The policy incorporates greater detail of cash management and investment guidelines of surplus funds delegated for investing and reinvesting by the County Treasurer. Copies of the Treasurer's Investment Policy dated June 2016 are submitted to the Board of Supervisors for review and acceptance APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Brice Bins, (925) 957-2848 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 78 To:Board of Supervisors From:Russell Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Treasurer's Investment Policy for the Fiscal Year 2016-2017 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 622 ATTACHMENTS TreasInvestPolicy2016 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 623 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 1   CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TREASURER’S  ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY   FISCAL YEAR 2016‐2017  APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN JUNE 2016 The Contra Costa County Treasurer will annually present to both the Board of Supervisors (Board) and the Treasury Oversight Committee (Committee) a statement of investment policy, which the Board shall review and approve at a public meeting. Any changes in the policy shall also be reviewed and approved by the Board at a public meeting (Gov’t Code §53646(a)(1)). OFFICE OF COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR 625 COURTS STREET, ROOM 100 MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 624 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 2   Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................. 4  2.0 SCOPE .................................................................................................................................................. 4  3.0 PARTICIPANTS ..................................................................................................................................... 4  4.0 IMPLEMENTATION .............................................................................................................................. 4  5.0 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................................... 4  6.0 GENERAL STRATEGY ........................................................................................................................... 5  7.0 STANDARD OF CARE ........................................................................................................................... 6  8.0 SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY ............................................................................................................. 7  9.0 AUTHORIZED BROKERS/DEALERS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS ................................................... 8  10.0 SUITABLE AND AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS ..................................................................................... 8  11.0 RESTRICTIONS AND PROHIBITIONS ................................................................................................. 14  12.0 INVESTMENT PARAMETERS ............................................................................................................. 15  13.0 CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) ................................................................. 17  14.0 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY ............................................................................................. 19  15.0 REPORTING ....................................................................................................................................... 19  16.0 COMPENSATION ............................................................................................................................... 20  17.0 CALCULATING AND APPORTIONING POOL EARNINGS .................................................................... 21  18.0 DEPOSITS AND WITHDRAWALS IN THE TREASURY ......................................................................... 21  19.0 TEMPORARY BORROWING OF POOL FUNDS ................................................................................... 22  20.0 INVESTMENT OF BOND PROCEEDS .................................................................................................. 23  21.0 DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN .............................................................................................................. 23  22.0 POLICY CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................................ 23  AUTHORIZATION FOR LAIF INVESTMENTS .................................................................................................. 24  APPROVED BROKERS ................................................................................................................................... 25  APPROVED ISSUERS .................................................................................................................................... 26  APPROVED PRIMARY DEALERS ................................................................................................................... 27  CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE ..................................................................................................................... 28  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 625 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 3   GLOSSARY OF TERMS .................................................................................................................................. 30    AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 626 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 4   CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TREASURER’S ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY 1.0 PURPOSE  The purpose of this Investment Policy (Policy) is to establish cash management and investment  guidelines of surplus funds entrusted to the care of the Contra Costa County Treasurer’s Office  (Treasurer’s Office) in accordance with applicable sections of California Government Code.  All portfolio  activities will be judged by the standards of the Policy and its ranking of investment objectives.  2.0 SCOPE  This Policy applies to all funds over which the Treasurer’s Office has been granted fiduciary responsibility  and direct control for their management.  3.0 PARTICIPANTS  This Policy restricts deposits to those agencies mandated by California Government Code as treasury  deposits.  However, subject to the consent of the Treasurer’s Office and in accordance with section  53684, exemptions may be granted to non‐mandatory depositing agencies, if it is determined that the  additional deposit provides a benefit to the investment pool as a whole while not creating  unmanageable liquidity risk.  4.0 IMPLEMENTATION  In order to provide direction to those responsible for management of surplus funds, the County  Treasurer has established this Policy and presented it to the Treasury Oversight Committee and the  Board of Supervisors, and has made it available to the legislative body of local agencies that participates  in the County Treasurer’s investment program.  The Policy explains investable funds; authorized instruments; credit quality required; maximum  maturities and concentrations; collateral requirements; qualifications of broker‐dealers and financial  institutions doing business with, or on behalf of, the County; limits on gifts and honoraria; the reporting  requirements; the Treasury Oversight Committee; the manner of apportioning interest earnings and  appropriating investment costs; and the criteria to request withdrawal of funds.  5.0 OBJECTIVES  Gov’t Code §53600.5: When investing, reinvesting, purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling or  managing public funds, the primary objective of a trustee shall be to safeguard the principal of the funds  under its control.  The secondary objective shall be to meet the liquidity needs of the depositor.  The  third objective shall be to achieve a return on the funds under its controls.  5.1 Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the investment program.  Investments shall be  undertaken in a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the overall portfolio.   The objective will be to mitigate credit risk and market risk.  5.1.a Credit Risk  The Treasurer will minimize credit risk, the risk of loss due to the failure of the security  issuer or backer, by:  1.  Limiting investments to the safest type of securities  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 627 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 5   2.  Pre‐qualifying the financial institutions, broker/dealers, intermediaries, and advisers  with which the Treasurer’s Office will do business  3.  Diversifying the investment portfolio so that potential losses on individual securities  will be minimized.  5.1.b Market Risk  The Treasurer’s Office will minimize the risk that the market value of securities in the  portfolio will fall due to changes in general interest rates, by:  1. Structuring the investment portfolio so that securities mature to meet cash  requirements for ongoing operations, thereby avoiding the need to sell securities on  the open market prior to maturity  2. Investing operating funds primarily in shorter‐term securities, money market mutual  funds, or similar investment pools.  5.2 Liquidity: The investment portfolio shall remain sufficiently liquid to meet all operating  requirements that may be reasonably anticipated.  This is accomplished by structuring the  portfolio so that securities mature concurrent with cash needs to meet anticipated demands.   Furthermore, since all possible cash demands cannot be anticipated, the portfolio should consist  largely of securities with active secondary or resale markets.  A portion of the portfolio also may  be placed in money market mutual funds or local government investment pools which offer  same‐day liquidity for short‐term funds.  5.3 Yield: The investment portfolio shall be designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of  return throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the investment risk  constraints and liquidity needs.  Return on investment is of secondary importance compared to  the safety and liquidity objectives described above.  The core of investments is limited to  relatively low risk securities in anticipation of earning a fair return relative to the risk being  assumed.  Securities may be sold prior to maturity when deemed prudent and necessary.   Reasons of selling include but are not limited to:   1. A security with declining credit may be sold early to minimize loss of principal.  2. A security swap would improve the quality, yield, or target duration in the portfolio.  3. Liquidity needs of the portfolio require that the security be sold.  4. Portfolio rebalancing would bring the portfolio back into compliance.  Investments will be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing, which  persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own  affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital  as well as the probable income to be derived.  5.4 Public Trust: All investments will be in conformance with state law and county ordinances and  policies.  The investment of public funds is a task that must maintain the public trust.  6.0 GENERAL STRATEGY  6.1 Buy and Hold:  The Treasurer will generally use the passive investment strategy known as BUY  AND HOLD whereas securities are purchased with the intent of holding them to maturity.   Interest income and the reinvestment of interest income usually are the only sources of return  in the portfolio.  The investment program will focus on purchasing securities that will limit or reduce the  potential default risk and ensure the reliability of cash flows from interest income.  Generally,  purchases will be laddered throughout the portfolio in order to minimize the number and cost  of investment transactions.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 628 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 6   6.2 Directed Investment:  Local agencies may direct the investment, exchange, liquidation and  reinvestment of their assets, but must meet the provisions of the investment objectives of this  policy.  The withdrawal of funds in the Treasury shall coincide with investment maturities or  authorized sales of securities by the local agency’s legislative or governing body.  7.0 STANDARD OF CARE  The following policies are designed in accordance with Government Code to provide transparency to the  investment program while enhancing portfolio controls:  7.1 Prudent Investor Standard:  “Governing bodies of local agencies or persons authorized to make  investment decisions on behalf of those local agencies investing public funds are trustees and  therefore fiduciaries subject to the prudent investor standard. When investing, reinvesting,  purchasing, acquiring, exchanging, selling or managing public funds, a trustee shall act with care,  skill, prudence and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing, that a prudent person  acting in a like capacity and familiarity with those matters would use in the conduct of funds of a  like character and with like aims, to safeguard the principal and maintain the liquidity needs of  the agency.  Within the limitations of this section and considering individual investments as part  to an overall strategy, investments may be acquired as authorized by law.” (Gov’t Code  §53600.3.1)  7.2 Limits on Honoraria, Gifts, and Gratuities  In accordance with California Government Code Section 27133(d), this Policy establishes limits  for the Director of Finance; individuals responsible for management of the portfolios; and  members of the Investment Group and Review Group who direct individual investment  decisions, select individual investment advisors and broker/dealers, and conduct day‐to‐day  investment trading activity. The limits also apply to members of the Oversight Committee.  Any  individual who receives an aggregate total of gifts, honoraria and gratuities in excess of $50 in a  calendar year from a broker/dealer, bank or service provider to the Pooled Investment Fund  must report the gifts, dates and firms to the designated filing official and complete the  appropriate State forms.  No individual may receive aggregate gifts, honoraria, and gratuities in a calendar year in excess  of the amount specified in Section 18940.2(a) of Title 2, Division 6 of the California Code of  Regulations. This limitation is $460 for the period January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016. Any  violation must be reported to the State Fair Political Practices Commission.  Please refer to the Contra Costa County Treasurer‐Tax Collector’s Conflict of Interest Code for  further explanation of the prohibited activities, and their enforcements and exceptions.  7.3 Delegation of Authority  7.4.a Subject to Section 53607, the board of supervisors may, by ordinance, delegate to the  county treasurer the authority to invest or reinvest the funds of the county and the  funds of other depositors in the county treasury, pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing  with Section 53600) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5. The county treasurer shall  thereafter assume full responsibility for those transactions until the board of supervisors  either revokes its delegation of authority, by ordinance, or decides not to renew the  annual delegation, as provided in Section 53607 (Gov’t Code §27000.1).  7.4.b The authority of the legislative body to invest or to reinvest funds of a local agency, or to  sell or exchange securities so purchased, may be delegated for a one‐year period by the  legislative body to the treasurer of the local agency, who shall thereafter assume full  responsibility for those transactions until the delegation of authority is revoked or  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 629 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 7   expires, and shall make a monthly report of those transactions to the legislative body.  Subject to review, the legislative body may renew the delegation of authority pursuant  to this section each year (Gov’t Code §53607).  7.4.c Responsibility for the operation of the investment program is hereby delegated to the  County Treasurer, who shall act in accordance with established written procedures and  internal controls for the operation of the investment program consistent with this  investment policy.  Procedures include references to: safekeeping, delivery vs. payment,  investment accounting, repurchase agreements, wire transfer agreements, and  collateral/depository agreements.  No person may engage in an investment transaction  except as provided under the terms of this policy and the procedures established by the  County Treasurer.  7.5 Treasury Oversight Committee: In compliance with a Board Order of the Contra Costa County  Board of Supervisors, the County Contra Costa County Treasury Oversight Committee was  established in November 6 of 1995.  The intent of the Committee is to allow local agencies,  including school districts, as well as the public, to participate in reviewing the policies that guide  the investment of public funds.  The mandate for the existence of the Committee was  suspended in 2004 by the State of California; however, the Committee serves an important  function and the Treasurer’s Office has elected to continue the program.  7.5.a The Committee shall annually review and monitor the County’s Investment Policy.  7.5.b The Committee shall cause an annual audit to determine the County Treasurer’s  compliance with the Investment Policy and all investment funds in the county Treasury.  8.0 SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY  8.1 Delivery vs. Payment:  All trades of marketable securities will be executed (cleared and settled)  on a delivery vs. payment (DVP) basis to ensure that securities are deposited in the County  Treasurer’s safekeeping institution prior to the release of funds.  8.2 Third‐party Safekeeping:  Securities will be held by an independent third‐party safekeeping  institution selected by the County Treasurer. All securities will be evidenced by safekeeping  receipts in the County’s name or in a name designated by the County Treasurer.  The  safekeeping institution shall annually provide a copy of its most recent report on internal  controls ‐ Service Organization Control Reports (formerly 70, or SAS 70) prepared in accordance  with the Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No. 16 (effective June 15,  2011.)  8.2.a A local agency purchasing or obtaining any securities prescribed in this section, in a  negotiable, bearer, registered or non‐registered format, shall require delivery of the  securities to the local agency, including those purchased for the agency by financial  advisors, consultants or managers using the agency’s funds, by book entry, physical  delivery or by third‐party custodial agreement. The transfer of securities to the  counterparty bank’s customer book‐entry account may be used for book‐entry delivery.  For purposes of this section, “counterparty” means the other party to the transaction. A  counterparty bank’s trust department or separate safekeeping department may be used  for the physical delivery of the security if the security is held in the name of the local  agency. Where this section specifies a percentage limitation for a particular category of  investment, that percentage is applicable only at the date of purchase. Where this  section does not specify a limitation on the term of remaining maturity at the time of  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 630 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 8   the investment, no investment shall be made in any security other than a security  underlying a repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement authorized by this section.   8.2.b In compliance with this section, the securities of Contra Costa County and its agencies  shall be in safekeeping at The Bank of New York Trust Company, N. A., a counterparty  bank’s trust department or as defined in the debt indenture and contract.  8.3 Internal Controls:  The County Treasurer is responsible for establishing and maintaining an  internal control structure designed to ensure that the assets of the Treasurer are protected from  loss, theft or misuse.  Specifics for the internal controls shall be documented in an investment  procedures manual that shall be reviewed and updated periodically by the County Treasurer.  The internal control structure shall be designed to provide reasonable assurance that these  objectives are met.  The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that (1) the cost of control  should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits  requires estimates and judgments by management.  9.0 AUTHORIZED BROKERS/DEALERS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS  9.1 All transactions initiated on behalf of the Pooled Investment Fund and Contra Costa County shall  be executed only through one of the following:   1. Government security dealers reporting as primary dealers to the Market Reports Division  of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York;   2. Banks and financial institutions that directly issue their own securities which have been  placed on the Approved List of Broker/Dealers and Financial Institutions;  3. Brokers/dealers in the State of California approved by the County Treasurer based on the  reputation and expertise of the company and individuals employed.  Broker/dealers and financial institutions which have exceeded the political contribution limits  as contained in Rule G‐37 of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board within a four year  period to the County Treasurer or a member of the governing board of a local agency or any  candidate for those offices, are prohibited from the Approval List of Broker/Dealers and  Financial Institutions.  9.2 Qualifications:  All financial institutions and broker/dealers who desire to become qualified for  investment transactions must complete Contra Costa County Treasurer’s Office Broker/Dealer  Due Diligence Questionnaire which can be obtained at www.cctax.us. An annual review of the  financial condition and registration of qualified financial institutions and broker/dealers will be  conducted by the Treasurer’s Office.  9.3 List of Approved Financial Institutions, Security Brokers and Dealers  A list will be maintained of financial institutions authorized to provide investment services.  In  addition, a list also will be maintained of approved security broker/dealers selected for  creditworthiness and qualifications stated in section 9.2. However, the County Treasury will not  be limited to the financial institutions and brokers/dealers on the list. Others will be included as  long as conditions for authorized financial institutions and brokers/dealers set forth in this Policy  are met. Additionally, deletions and additions are based on the maintenance of required credit  quality as rated by a nationally recognized statistical‐rating organization (NRSRO) or reliable  financial sources.  10.0 SUITABLE AND AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS  10.1 Authorized Investment Types: (Gov’t Code §53601 et seq.)  The legislative body of a local  agency having moneys in a sinking fund or moneys in its treasury not required for the immediate  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 631 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 9   needs of the local agency may invest any portion of the moneys that it deems wise or expedient  in the investments set forth below. A local agency purchasing or obtaining any securities  prescribed in this section, in a negotiable, bearer, registered, or nonregistered format, shall  require delivery of the securities to the local agency, including those purchased for the agency  by financial advisers, consultants, or managers using the agency's funds, by book entry, physical  delivery, or by third‐party custodial agreement. The transfer of securities to the counterparty  bank's customer book entry account may be used for book entry delivery.  For purposes of this section, "counterparty" means the other party to the transaction. A  counterparty bank's trust department or separate safekeeping department may be used for the  physical delivery of the security if the security is held in the name of the local agency. Where  this section specifies a percentage and/or rating limitation for a particular category of  investment, that percentage and/or rating are applicable only at the date of purchase. Where  this section does not specify a limitation on the term or remaining maturity at the time of the  investment, no investment shall be made in any security, other than a security underlying a  repurchase or reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement authorized by this  section, that at the time of the investment has a term remaining to maturity in excess of five  years, unless the legislative body has granted express authority to make that investment either  specifically or as a part of an investment program approved by the legislative body no less than  three months prior to the investment:  10.1.a Bonds issued by the local agencies, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues  from a revenue‐producing property, owned, controlled, or operated by the local agency  or by a department, board, agency or authority of the local agency.  10.1.b United States Treasury notes, bonds, bills or certificates of indebtedness, or those for  which the faith and credit of the United States are pledged for the payment of principal  and interest.  10.1.c Registered state warrants or treasury notes or bonds of this state, including bonds  payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue‐producing property owned,  controlled, or operated by the state or by a department, board, agency or authority of  the state.  10.1.d Registered treasury notes or bonds of any of the other 49 states in addition to  California, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue‐producing  property owned, controlled, or operated by a state or by a department, board, agency,  or authority of any of the other 49 states, in addition to California.  10.1.e Bonds, notes, warrants or other evidences of indebtedness of any local agency within  this state, including bonds payable solely out of the revenues from a revenue‐producing  property owned, controlled or operated by the local agency, or by a department, board,  agency or authority of the local agency.  10.1.f Federal agency or United States government‐sponsored enterprise obligations,  participations, or other instruments, including those issued by or fully guaranteed as to  principal and interest by federal agencies or United States government‐sponsored  enterprises.  10.1.g Banker’s acceptances otherwise known as bills of exchange or time drafts drawn on  and accepted by a commercial bank. Purchases of banker’s acceptances may not exceed  180 days’ maturity or 40 percent of the agency’s money that may be invested pursuant  to this section. However, no more than 30 percent of the agency’s money may be  invested in banker’s acceptances of any one commercial bank pursuant to this section.  This subdivision does not preclude a municipal utility district from investing any money  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 632 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 10   in its treasury in any manner authorized by the Municipal Utility District Act (Division 6,  commencing with Section 11501, of the Public Utilities Code).  10.1.h Commercial paper of “prime” quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and  number rating as provided for by a nationally recognized statistical‐rating organization  (NRSRO). The entity that issues the commercial paper shall meet all of the following  conditions in either paragraph (1) or paragraph (2):  1. The entity meets the following criteria:  A. Is organized and operating in the United States as a general corporation.  B. Has total assets in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000).  C. Has debt other than commercial paper, if any, that is rated “A” or higher by a  nationally recognized statistical‐rating organization (NRSRO).  2. The entity meets the following criteria:  A. Is organized within the United States as a special purpose corporation, trust, or  limited liability company.  B. Has program‐wide credit enhancements including, but not limited to, over  collateralization, letters of credit, or surety bond.  C. Has commercial paper that is rated “A‐1” or higher, or the equivalent, by a  nationally recognized statistical‐rating organization (NRSRO).  Eligible commercial paper shall have a maximum maturity of 270 days or less. Local  agencies, other than counties or a city and county, may invest no more than 25 percent  of their moneys in eligible commercial paper. Local agencies, other than counties or a  city and county, may purchase no more than 10 percent of the outstanding commercial  paper of any single issuer. Counties or a city and county may invest in commercial paper  pursuant to the concentration limits in subdivision (a) of Section 53635:  i. Not more than 40 percent of the local agency’s money may be invested in    eligible commercial paper.  ii. Not more than 10 percent of the total assets of the investments held by a local  agency may be invested in any one issuer’s commercial paper.  10.1.i Negotiable certificates of deposit issued by a nationally‐ or state‐chartered bank or a  savings association or federal association (as defined by Section 5102 of the Financial  Code), a state or federal credit union, or by a state‐licensed branch of a foreign bank.  Purchases of negotiable certificates of deposit may not exceed 30 percent of the  agency’s money that may be invested pursuant to this section. For purposes of this  section, negotiable certificates of deposits do not come within Article 2 (commencing  with Section 53630), except that the amount so invested shall be subject to the  limitations of Section 53638. The legislative body of a local agency and the treasurer or  other official of the local agency having legal custody of the money are prohibited from  investing local agency funds, or funds in the custody of the local agency, in negotiable  certificates of deposit issued by a state or federal credit union if a member of the  legislative body of the local agency, or any person with investment decision making  authority in the administrative office, manager’s office, budget office, auditor‐ controller’s office, or treasurer’s office of the local agency also serves on the board of  directors, or any committee appointed by the board of directors, or the credit  committee or the supervisory committee of the state or federal credit union issuing the  negotiable certificates of deposit.  10.1.j Repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 633 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 11   1. Investments in repurchase agreements or reverse repurchase agreements of any  securities authorized by this section, provided that the agreements are subject to  this subdivision, including the delivery requirements specified in this section, and  that a signed Master Repurchase Agreement is on file in the Treasurer’s Office for all  financial institutions that enter into a repurchase agreement with Contra Costa  County.  2. Investments in repurchase agreements may be made on any investment authorized  in this section when the term of the agreement does not exceed one year. The  market value of securities that underlay a repurchase agreement shall be valued at  102 percent or greater of the funds borrowed against those securities and the value  shall be adjusted no less than quarterly. Since the market value of the underlying  securities is subject to daily market fluctuations, the investments in repurchase  agreements shall be in compliance if the value of the underlying securities is  brought back up to 102 percent no later than the next business day.  3. Reverse repurchase agreements or securities lending agreements may be utilized  only when all of the following conditions are met:  A. The security to be sold using a reverse repurchase agreement or securities  lending agreement has been owned and fully paid for by the local agency for a  minimum of 30 days prior to sale.  B. The total of all reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending  agreements on investments owned by the local agency does not exceed 20  percent of the base value of the portfolio.  C. The agreement does not exceed a term of 92 days, unless the agreement  includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the  entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase  agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity date of the  same security.  D. Funds obtained or funds within the pool of an equivalent amount to that  obtained from selling a security to a counterparty using a reverse repurchase  agreement or securities lending agreement shall not be used to purchase  another security with a maturity longer than 92 days from the initial settlement  date of the reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement,  unless the reverse repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement  includes a written codicil guaranteeing a minimum earning or spread for the  entire period between the sale of a security using a reverse repurchase  agreement or securities lending agreement and the final maturity date of the  same security.  4. Prior approval of the governing body; only with primary dealers:  A. Investments in reverse repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements,  or similar investments in which the local agency sells securities prior to purchase  with a simultaneous agreement to repurchase the security may be made only  upon prior approval of the governing body of the local agency and shall be made  only with primary dealers of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or with a  nationally or state‐chartered bank that has or has had a significant banking  relationship with a local agency.  B. For purposes of this policy, "significant banking relationship" means any of the  following activities of a bank:  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 634 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 12   i. Involvement in the creation, sale, purchase, or retirement of a local  agency's bonds, warrants, notes, or other evidence of indebtedness.  ii. Financing of a local agency's activities.  iii. Acceptance of a local agency's securities or funds as deposits.  5. Definitions and terms of repos, securities and securities lending:  A. "Repurchase agreement" means a purchase of securities by the local agency  pursuant to an agreement by which the counterparty seller will repurchase the  securities on or before a specified date and for a specified amount and the  counterparty will deliver the underlying securities to the local agency by book  entry, physical delivery, or by third‐party custodial agreement. The transfer of  underlying securities to the counterparty bank's customer book‐entry account  may be used for book‐entry delivery.  B. "Securities," for purposes of repurchase under this subdivision, means securities  of the same issuer, description, issue date, and maturity.  C. "Reverse repurchase agreement" means a sale of securities by the local agency  pursuant to an agreement by which the local agency will repurchase the  securities on or before a specified date and includes other comparable  agreements.  D. "Securities lending agreement" means an agreement under which a local agency  agrees to transfer securities to a borrower who, in turn, agrees to provide  collateral to the local agency. During the term of the agreement, both the  securities and the collateral are held by a third party. At the conclusion of the  agreement, the securities are transferred back to the local agency in return for  the collateral.  E. For purposes of this section, the base value of the local agency's pool portfolio  shall be that dollar amount obtained by totaling all cash balances placed in the  pool by all pool participants, excluding any amounts obtained through selling  securities by way of reverse repurchase agreements, securities lending  agreements, or other similar borrowing methods.  F. For purposes of this section, the spread is the difference between the cost of  funds obtained using the reverse repurchase agreement and the earnings  obtained on the reinvestment of the funds.  10.1.k Medium‐term notes, defined as all corporate and depository institution debt securities  with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, issued by corporations  organized and operating within the United States or by depository institutions licensed  by the United States or any state and operating within the United States.  Notes eligible  for investment under this subdivision shall be rated "A" or better by an NRSRO.  Purchases of medium‐term notes shall not include other instruments authorized by this  section and may not exceed 30 percent of the agency's moneys that may be invested  pursuant to this section.  10.1.l Shares of beneficial interest  1. Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies that  invest in the securities and obligations as authorized by subdivisions (a) to (k),  inclusive, and subdivisions (m) to (o), inclusive, and that comply with the investment  restrictions of this article and Article 2 (commencing with Section 53630). However,  notwithstanding these restrictions, a counterparty to a reverse repurchase  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 635 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 13   agreement or securities lending agreement is not required to be a primary dealer of  the Federal Reserve Bank of New York if the company's board of directors finds that  the counterparty presents a minimal risk of default, and the value of the securities  underlying a repurchase agreement or securities lending agreement may be 100  percent of the sales price if the securities are marked to market daily.  2. Shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management companies that are  money market funds registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under  the Investment Company Act of 1940 (l5 U.S.C. Sec. 80a‐1 et seq.).  3. If investment is in shares issued pursuant to paragraph (1), the company shall have  met either of the following criteria:  A. Attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided  by not less than two NRSROs.  B. Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from registration with the  Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years' experience  investing in the securities and obligations authorized by subdivisions (a) to (k),  inclusive, and subdivisions (m) to (o), inclusive, and with assets under  management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000).  4. If investment is in shares issued pursuant to paragraph (2), the company shall have  met the following criteria:  A. Attained the highest ranking or the highest letter and numerical rating provided  by not less than two nationally recognized statistical rating organizations.  B. Retained an investment adviser registered or exempt from registration with the  Securities and Exchange Commission with not less than five years' experience  investing in the securities and obligations authorized by subdivisions (a) to (k),  inclusive, and subdivisions (m) to (o), inclusive, and with assets under  management in excess of five hundred million dollars ($500,000,000).  5. The purchase price of shares of beneficial interest purchased pursuant to this  subdivision shall not include any commission that the companies may charge and  shall not exceed 20 percent of the agency’s money that may be invested pursuant to  this section. However, no more than 10 percent of the agency’s funds may be  invested in shares of beneficial interest of any one mutual fund pursuant to  paragraph (1).  10.1.m Moneys held by a trustee or fiscal agent and pledged to the payment of security of  bonds or other indebtedness, or obligations under a lease, installment sale, or other  agreement of a local agency, or certificates of participation in those bonds,  indebtedness, or lease installment sale, or other agreements, may be invested in  accordance with the statutory provisions governing the issuance of those bonds,  indebtedness, or lease installment sale, or other agreement, or to the extent not  inconsistent therewith or if there are not specific statutory provision, in accordance with  the ordinance, resolution, indenture, or agreement of the local agency providing for the  issuance.  10.1.n Notes, bonds, or other obligations that are at all times secured by a valid first‐priority  security interest in securities of the types listed by Section 53651 as eligible securities  for the purpose of securing local agency deposits having a market value at least equal to  that required by Section 53652 for the purpose of securing local agency deposits. The  securities serving as collateral shall be placed by delivery or book entry into the custody  of a trust company or the trust department of a bank that is not affiliated with the issuer  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 636 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 14   of the secured obligation, and the security interest shall be perfected in accordance with  the requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code or federal regulations applicable to  the types of securities in which the security interest is granted.  10.1.o Any mortgage pass‐through security, collateralized mortgage obligation, mortgage‐ backed or other pay‐through bond, equipment lease‐backed certificate, consumer  receivable pass‐through certificate, or consumer receivable‐backed bond of a  maximum of five years’ maturity. Securities eligible for investment under this  subdivision shall be issued by an issuer having an “A” or higher rating for the issuer’s  debt as provided by a nationally recognized rating service and rated in a rating category  of “AA” or its equivalent or better by a nationally recognized rating service. Purchase of  securities authorized by this subdivision may not exceed 20 percent of the agency’s  surplus money that may be invested pursuant to this section.  10.1.p Shares of beneficial interest issued by a joint power authority organized pursuant to  Section 6509.7 that invests in the securities and obligations authorized in subdivisions  (a) to (n), inclusive. Each share shall represent an equal proportional interest in the  underlying pool of securities owned by the joint powers authority. To be eligible under  this section, the joint powers authority issuing shares shall have retained an investment  adviser that meets all of the following criteria:  1. The adviser is registered or exempt from registration with the Securities and  Exchange Commission.  2. The adviser has not less than five years of experience investing in the securities and  obligations authorized in subdivisions (a) to (n) inclusive.  3. The adviser has assets under management in excess of five hundred million dollars  ($500,000,000).  10.1.q United States dollars denominated senior unsecured unsubordinated obligations  issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and  Development, International Finance Corporation, or Inter‐American Development Bank,  with a maximum remaining maturity of five years or less, and eligible for purchase and  sale within the United States. Investments under this subdivision shall be rated “AA” or  better by an NRSRO and shall not exceed 30 percent of the agency’s moneys that may  be invested pursuant to this section.    11.0 RESTRICTIONS AND PROHIBITIONS  11.1 Restrictions set by the Treasurer  11.1.a All investments purchased by the Treasurer’s Office shall be of investment grade. The  minimum credit rating of purchased investments shall be as defined by Government  Code 53600 et. seq.  11.1.b All legal securities issued by a tobacco‐related company are prohibited. A tobacco‐ related company is defined as 1) an entity that makes smoking products from tobacco  used in cigarettes, cigars and/or snuff, or for smoking in pipes or 2) a company that has  total revenues of 15 percent or more from the sale of such tobacco products. The  tobacco‐related issuers restricted from any investment are Alliance One, Altria Group,  Inc., Auri Inc., British American Tobacco PLC, Imperial Tobacco Group PLC, Kirin  International Holding Inc., Lorillard, Philip Morris International, Reynolds American, Inc.,  Schweitzer‐Mauduit International Inc., Smokefree Innotec Inc., Star Scientific Inc.,  Universal Corp., and Vector Group, Ltd.  The Treasury staff will update the list of  tobacco‐related companies when necessary.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 637 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 15   11.1.c Financial futures or financial option contracts will each be approved on a per trade basis  by the County Treasurer.  11.1.d Reverse repurchase agreements will be used strictly for the purpose of supplementing  income with a limit of 10 percent of the total portfolio with prior approval of the  Treasurer.  11.1.e SBA loans require prior approval of the Treasurer in every transaction.  11.1.f Securities purchased through brokers will be held in safekeeping at The Bank of New  York Trust Company, N.A. or as designated by the specific contract(s) for government  securities and tri‐party repurchase agreements.  11.1.g Swaps and Trades will each be approved on a per‐trade basis by Treasurer or Assistant  Treasurer.  11.1.h Bank CDs or non‐negotiable CDs will be collateralized at 110 percent by government  securities or 150 percent by current mortgages. There will be no waiver of the first  $100,000 collateral except by special arrangement with the Treasurer.  11.2 Prohibitions by Government Code (§53601.6)  11.2.a A local agency shall not invest any funds pursuant to this Article or pursuant to Article 2  (commencing with Section 53630) in inverse floaters, range notes or interest‐only strips  that are derived from a pool of mortgages.  11.2.b A local agency shall not invest any funds pursuant to this article or pursuant to Article 2  (commencing with Section 53630) in any security that could result in zero interest  accrual if held to maturity. However, a local agency may hold prohibited instruments  until their maturity dates. The limitation in this subdivision shall not apply to local  agency investments in shares of beneficial interest issued by diversified management  companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. Sec. 80a‐ 1,et seq.) that are authorized for investment pursuant to subdivision (l) of Section  53601.  12.0 INVESTMENT PARAMETERS  12.1 Diversification:  Investments shall be diversified so as to minimize the risk of loss and to  maximize the rate of return by:  1. Limiting investment to avoid overconcentration in securities from a specific issuer or  business sector (excluding U.S. Treasury securities),  2. Limiting investment in securities that have higher credit risks,  3. Investing in securities with varying maturities, and  4. Continuously investing a portion of the portfolio in readily available funds such as  investment pools, money market funds or overnight repurchase agreements to ensure  that appropriate liquidity is maintained in order to meet ongoing obligations.  12.2 Maximum Maturities:  To the extent possible, the County Treasurer shall attempt to match  its investments with anticipated cash flow requirements.  Unless matched to a specific cash  flow, the Treasurer will not directly invest in securities maturing more than five (5) years  from the date of purchase or in accordance with state and local statutes and ordinances.   The Treasurer shall adopt weighted average maturity limitations (which often range from 90  days to 3 years), consistent with the investment objectives.  Because of inherent difficulties in accurately forecasting cash flow requirements, a portion  of the portfolio should be continuously invested in readily available funds such as LAIF,  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 638 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 16   money market funds, or overnight repurchase agreements to ensure that appropriate  liquidity is maintained to meet ongoing obligations.  12.3 Exception to Maximum Maturity:  In accordance with Government Code §53601 the County  Treasurer retains the right to petition the Board of Supervisors for approval to invest in  securities with a final maturity in excess of five years.  The Board of Supervisors adoption of  any resolution allowing maturities beyond five years shall be considered an allowed  modification to this policy and any investments made in accordance with the modification  shall be allowable under this policy.  12.4 Investment Criteria1: All limitations set forth in this Policy are applicable only at the time of  purchase. The County Treasurer has the full discretion to rebalance the portfolio when it is  out of compliance owing to various reasons, such as market fluctuation.  INVESTMENT TYPE  MAXIMUM  % of  PORTFOLIO  MAXIMUM  MATURITY  MAXIMUM  % of ISSUE OTHER RESTRICTIONS  Bonds issued by local agencies,  §53601 (a) 100% 5 years 100%   U.S. Treasury Obligations, §53601 (b) 100% 5 years 100%   Registered State Warrants, and CA  Treasury Notes and bonds, §53601  (c)  100% 5 years 100%   Registered Treasury Notes or Bonds  of any of the other 49 state in  addition to CA, §53601 (d)  100% 5 years 100%   Bonds and Notes issued by other  local agencies in California, §53601  (e)  100% 5 years 100%   Obligations of U.S. Agencies or  government sponsored enterprises,  §53601 (f)    100%    5 years    100%      U.S. Agencies Callables 100% 5 years 25%   Bankers Acceptances), §53601 (g)    Domestic: ($5B min. assets)      Foreign:    ($5B min. assets)      40%    40%      180 days    180 days    30%  Aggregate    5%  Aggregate    Commercial paper, §53601 (h) and  §53635 (a) 40% 270 days  or less  10%  Aggregate  No more than 10 % of the local agency’s money  may be invested in the outstanding commercial  paper of any single issuer.  Negotiable Certificates of Deposit ($5  billion minimum assets), §53601 (i) 30% 5 years 10%  Aggregate   Repurchase Agreements secured by  U.S. Treasury or agency obligation  (102% collateral), §53601 (j)  100% 1 year    See  limitations  for  Treasuries  and Agencies  above  Generally limited to Wells Fargo Bank, Bank of  America or other institutions with whom the  County treasury has executed tri‐party  agreements. Collateral will be held by a third  party to the transaction that may include the  trust department of particular banks. Collateral  will be only securities that comply with  Government Code 53601.  Reverse Repurchase Agreements and  Securities Lending Agreements,  §53601 (j)  20% 92 days  See  limitations  for  Treasuries  and Agencies  above                                                                 1 The rating requirement for each investment type is referenced in the relevant sections of California Government Code.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 639 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 17   INVESTMENT TYPE  MAXIMUM  % of  PORTFOLIO  MAXIMUM  MATURITY  MAXIMUM  % of ISSUE OTHER RESTRICTIONS  Corporate bonds, Medium Term  Notes  & Covered, §53601 (k)  30%   5 years 5%  Aggregate    Shares of beneficial interest issued  by diversified mgt. companies  §53601 (l)  20% N/A 10%  Aggregate    Moneys held by a trustee or fiscal  agent, §53601 (m) 20% N/A    Collateralized Notes, Bonds, Time  Deposits, or other obligations,  §53601 (n)  15% 5 years 5%  Aggregate  Collateralized by the eligible securities at a  percentage specified in Government Code  53652.  Mrtg Backed Securities/CMO’s:  Asset Backed Securities  §53601 (o)  20%    20%  5 Years    5 Years  5%  Aggregate  No Inverse Floaters  No Range Notes  No Interest only strips derived from a pool of  mortgages  Joint Powers Authority, CalTRUST,  §53601 (p)  As limited  by  CalTRUST  N/A As limited by  CalTRUST   Supranational obligations §53601 (q) 30% 5 Years 100% Rated “AA” or better by an NRSRO  Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF),  §16429.1  As Limited  by LAIF N/A As limited by  LAIF     13.0 CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)  13.1 General Information (Gov’t Code §16305.9).  13.1.a All money in the Local Agency Investment Fund shall be held in trust in the custody  of the State Treasurer.  13.1.b All money in the Local Agency Investment Fund is nonstate money. That money shall  be held in a trust account or accounts. The Controller shall be responsible for  maintaining those accounts to record the Treasurer's accountability, and shall  maintain a separate account for each trust deposit in the Local Agency Investment  Fund.  13.1.c That money shall be subject to audit by the Department of Finance and to cash  count as provided for in Sections 13297, 13298, and 13299. It may be withdrawn  only upon the order of the depositing entity or its disbursing officers. The system  that the Director of Finance has established for the handling, receiving, holding, and  disbursing of state agency money shall also be used for the money in the Local  Agency Investment Fund.  13.1.d All money in the Local Agency Investment Fund shall be deposited, invested, and  reinvested in the same manner and to the same extent as if it were state money in  the State Treasury.  13.2 Investment and Distribution of Deposits (§16429.1).  13.2.a There is in trust in the custody of the Treasurer the Local Agency Investment Fund,  which fund is hereby created. The Controller shall maintain a separate account for  each governmental unit having deposits in this fund.  13.2.b Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, a local governmental official, with the  consent of the governing body of that agency, having money in its treasury not  required for immediate needs, may remit the money to the Treasurer for deposit in  the Local Agency Investment Fund for the purpose of investment.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 640 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 18   13.2.c Notwithstanding any other provisions of law, an officer of any nonprofit corporation  whose membership is confined to public agencies or public officials, or an officer of  a qualified quasi‐governmental agency, with the consent of the governing body of  that agency, having money in its treasury not required for immediate needs, may  remit the money to the Treasurer for deposit in the Local Agency Investment Fund  for the purpose of investment.  13.2.d Notwithstanding any other provision of law or of this section, a local agency, with  the approval of its governing body, may deposit in the Local Agency Investment  Fund proceeds of the issuance of bonds, notes, certificates of participation, or other  evidences of indebtedness of the agency pending expenditure of the proceeds for  the authorized purpose of their issuance. In connection with these deposits of  proceeds, the Local Agency Investment Fund is authorized to receive and disburse  moneys, and to provide information, directly with or to an authorized officer of a  trustee or fiscal agency engaged by the local agency, the Local Agency Investment  Fund is authorized to hold investments in the name and for the account of that  trustee or fiscal agent, and the Controller shall maintain a separate account for each  deposit of proceeds.  13.2.e The local governmental unit, the nonprofit corporation, or the quasi‐governmental  agency has the exclusive determination of the length of time its money will be on  deposit with the Treasurer.  13.2.f The trustee or fiscal agent of the local governmental unit has the exclusive  determination of the length of time proceeds from the issuance of bonds will be on  deposit with the Treasurer.  13.2.g The Local Investment Advisory Board shall determine those quasi‐governmental  agencies which qualify to participate in the Local Agency Investment Fund.  13.2.h The Treasurer may refuse to accept deposits into the fund if, in the judgment of the  Treasurer, the deposit would adversely affect the state’s portfolio.  13.2.i The Treasurer may invest the money of the fund in securities prescribed in Section  16430. The Treasurer may elect to have the money of the fund invested through the  Surplus Money Investment Fund as provided in Article 4 (commencing with Section  16470) of Chapter 3 of Part 2 of Division 4 of Title 2.  13.2.j Money in the fund shall be invested to achieve the objective of the fund, that is to  realize the maximum return consistent with safe and prudent treasury  management.  13.2.k All instruments of title of all investments of the fund shall remain in the Treasurer’s  vault or be held in safekeeping under control of the Treasurer in any federal reserve  bank, or any branch thereof, or the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, with  any trust company, or the trust department of any state or national bank.  13.2.l Immediately at the conclusion of each calendar quarter, all interest earned and  other increment derived from investments shall be distributed by the Controller to  the contributing governmental units or trustees or fiscal agents, nonprofit  corporations, and quasi‐governmental agencies in amounts directly proportionate  to the respective amounts deposited in the Local Agency Investment fund and the  length of time the amounts remained therein. An amount equal to the reasonable  costs incurred in carrying out the provisions of this section, not to exceed a  maximum of one‐half of one percent of the earnings of this fund, shall be deducted  from the earnings prior to distribution. The amount of this deduction shall be  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 641 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 19   credited as reimbursements to the state agencies having incurred costs in carrying  out the provisions of this section.  13.2.m The Treasurer shall prepare for distribution a monthly report of investments made  during the preceding month.  14.0 PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT ACTIVITY  14.1 Passive Portfolio Management:  (See Section 6.0., General Strategy)  14.2 Competitive Bidding:  Investments will be purchased in the most cost effective and efficient manner by using a  competitive bidding process for the purchase of securities.  Competitive bidding is required  from a pre‐approved list of broker/dealers on all investment transactions except for new  issue securities.  14.3 Reviewing and Monitoring of the Portfolio:  Monthly reports will review portfolio investments to ensure they are kept track of in a  timely manner.  The reports will also monitor the County Treasurer’s investment practices  and the results of such practices.  14.4 Portfolio Adjustments:  Certain actions may be taken if the portfolio becomes out of compliance.  For instance,  should a concentration limitation be exceeded due to an incident such as a fluctuation in  portfolio size, the affected securities may be held to maturity to avoid losses; however, the  County Treasurer may choose to rebalance the portfolio earlier to bring it back into  compliance if the portfolio will not suffer any losses for selling the investment prior to  maturity.  14.5 Performance Standards:  The investment portfolio will be managed in accordance with the parameters specified  within this Policy.  The portfolio should obtain a market average rate of return during a  market/economic environment of stable interest rates.  A series of appropriate benchmarks  shall be established against which portfolio performance shall be compared on a regular  basis.  15.0 REPORTING  15.1 Methodology:  The County Treasurer shall prepare an investment report at least quarterly,  including a management summary that provides an analysis of the status of the current  investment portfolio and transactions made over the last quarter.  This management  summary will be prepared in a manner which will allow the County Treasurer to ascertain  whether investment activities during the reporting period have conformed to the  investment policy.  The report shall be provided to the Chief Administrative Officer, the  County Auditor, the Board of Supervisors, Treasury Oversight Committee and any pool  participants [Government Code 27133(e), and 53646(b)].  The report will include the  following:  1. The type of investment, issuer, date of maturity, par and dollar amount invested on all  securities, investments and moneys held by the County Treasurer  2. A description of any of the local agency's funds, investments, or programs that are  under the management of contracted parties, including lending programs.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 642 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 20   3. A current market value as of the date of the report of all securities held by the local  agency, and under management of any outside party that is not also a local agency or  the State of California Local Agency Investment Fund, and the source of this same  valuation.  4. A statement that the portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy, or the  manner in which the portfolio is not in compliance.  5. A statement denoting the ability of the County Treasurer to meet its pool's expenditure  requirements for the next six months, or an explanation as to why sufficient money may  not be available.  6. Listing of individual securities by type and maturity date held at the end of the reporting  period.  A. PLEDGE REPORT: Any securities that are pledged or loaned for any purpose shall be  reported in the Quarterly Investment Report. The transaction detail will be  provided, including purpose, beginning and termination dates and all parties to the  contract. The security descriptions as to type, name, maturity date, coupon rate,  CUSIP and other material information will be included.  B. REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS REPORT: All reverse repurchase agreements  entered into, whether active or inactive by the end of each quarter, shall be  reported in the Treasurer’s Quarterly Investment Report.  7. Realized and unrealized gains or losses resulting from appreciation or depreciation by  listing the cost and market value of securities over one‐year duration that are not  intended to be held until maturity.  8. Average maturity and duration of portfolio on investments as well as the yield to  maturity of the portfolio as compared to applicable benchmarks.  9. Percentage of the total portfolio which each type of investment represents.  10. Whatever additional information or data may be required by the legislative body of the  local agency.  15.2 Marking to Market:  The market value of the portfolio shall be calculated at least quarterly  and a statement of the market value of the portfolio shall be issued at least quarterly.  This  will ensure that review of the investment portfolio, in terms of value and price volatility, has  been performed on a regular basis.  16.0 COMPENSATION  In accordance with Government Code §§27013 and 53684, the County Treasurer will charge all  pool participants for administrative and overhead costs.  Costs include, but are not limited to,  employee salaries and benefits, portfolio management, bank and custodial fees, software  maintenance fees and other indirect costs incurred from handling and managing funds.  In  addition, when applicable, the costs associated with the Treasury Oversight provisions of  Government Code §§ 27130‐27137 shall be included as administrative costs.  Costs will be  deducted from interest earnings on the pool prior to apportioning and payment of interest.  The  County Treasurer shall annually prepare a proposed budget providing a detailed itemization of  all estimated costs which comprise the administrative fee charged in accordance with  Government Code §27013.  The administrative fee will be subject to change.  Fees will be  deducted from interest earnings.  16.1 Deduction of Costs: At the discretion of the County Treasurer, the County Treasurer may  deduct actual administrative costs and may make any adjustments from the interest  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 643 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 21   earnings and apportions the remaining earnings to all participants based on the positive  average daily balance (Government Code 53684(b)).  16.2 Directed Investments Costs: At the discretion of the County Treasurer, the County Treasurer  may deduct from interest earnings the actual administrative costs of such directed  investments (Government Code §27013).  17.0 CALCULATING AND APPORTIONING POOL EARNINGS  The Investment Pool Fund is comprised of monies from multiple units of the County, agencies,  school districts and special districts.  Each entity has unique cash flow demands, which dictate  the type of investments the Treasurer’s Office may purchase.  To ensure parity among the pool  members when apportioning interest earnings, the following procedures have been developed:  1. Interest is apportioned on at least a quarterly basis in accordance with Government Code  §53684.  2. Interest is apportioned to pool participants based on the participant’s average daily fund  balance and the total average daily balance of deposits in the investment pool.  3. Interest is calculated on a cash basis for all investments in the County Treasurer’s  investment pool and reported to the Auditor‐Controller for distribution into the funds of the  participants.  4. Interest earned on the directed investments is credited to pool participants on a cash basis.  Administrative costs are determined annually by the County Treasurer based on actual  administrative and overhead costs incurred in the previous year.  5. Negative average daily fund balance will be charged interest at the rate of interest that is  being apportioned.  18.0 DEPOSITS AND WITHDRAWALS IN THE TREASURY  18.1 Deposit by Voluntary Participants  Following are the terms and conditions for deposit of funds for investment purposes by  voluntary participants, i.e. entities that are not legally required to deposit their funds in the  County Treasury.  18.1.a Resolution by the County Board of Supervisors authorizing the acceptance of outside  participants by the County Treasury.  18.1.b Resolution by the legislative or governing body of the local agency (voluntary  participant) authorizing the investment of funds pursuant to Government Code 53684.  18.1.c Treasury investments will be directed transactions.  For each transaction, the local  agency (voluntary participant) must indicate the fund source, the amount to be invested  and the duration of the investment.  18.2 Withdrawal Request  The Treasurer’s Office has established the Withdrawal of Funds Policy for all Treasury  Investment Pool participants who seek to withdraw funds from the County Treasury Investment  Pool for various purposes. In accordance with California State Government Code Section 27136,  all participants having funds on deposit in the Pool and seeking to withdraw their funds, shall  first submit a formal written request to the County Treasurer. The County Treasurer shall  evaluate the withdrawal proposals of all Pool participants upon receipt of the written requests.  The evaluation process may take up to 30 days. The County Treasurer reserves the right to reject  any request for withdrawal if it is in the Treasurer’s opinion after thorough evaluation, that the  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 644 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 22   withdrawal will violate applicable laws and/or governing documents, compromise Treasurer’s  fiduciary responsibility, adversely impact the stability of the Pool, or harm the interests of any  Pool Participant. Such rejection shall prevent the withdrawal of the funds.  Typically, participants make withdrawals for the following two reasons: a) regular operations  and b) investing or depositing funds outside the Pool in accordance with California State  Government Code Section 27136 (a). The County Treasurer seeks to honor all written  withdrawal requests for regular operating purposes that are approved by the County Auditor‐ Controller’s Office in a timely fashion. However, the County Treasurer recognizes that  occasionally the Pool participants may request large amounts in withdrawals to cover  unexpected operational needs. To accommodate such withdrawals and allow for adequate time  for adjustments to the liquidity position of the Pool, the County Treasurer expects all Pool  Participants to submit their written requests within the following timeframes:  i) Withdrawals of Up to $1 million – prior to 8:00 a.m. for  same day disbursement  ii) Withdrawals of between $1 million to $10 million – 1 business day in advance of  disbursement  iii) Withdrawals of more than $10 million – 3 business day in advance of disbursement  Withdrawals of investment deposits from the County Treasury Investment Pool by any Pool  participant shall coincide with investment maturities and/or authorized sale of securities by  authorized personnel of the Pool Participant. Except for funds in the California State Local  Agency Investment Fund, a five‐business‐days notification may be required when authorized  sale of securities is involved. In the event that the Treasurer must liquidate investments in order  to honor the withdrawal request, the Participant who requests the withdrawal shall be subject  to all expenses associated with the liquidation, including, but not limited to loss of principal and  interest income, withdrawal penalties, and associated fees.  To maintain full fiduciary responsibility for investment and administration of the Pool, the  County Treasurer shall NOT permit statutory participants to withdraw funds from and  subsequently deposit the funds outside the Pool for the purpose of investments without prior  approval of the County Treasurer.  As permitted by the Government Code Section 53635, upon  request the County Treasurer may enter into an investment agreement with a third party  investment manager on behalf of statutory participants. However, the funds shall remain in the  Pool during the entire agreement period under the care of the custodian bank retained by the  County Treasurer.  Voluntary participants may withdraw funds from and subsequently deposit the funds outside  the Pool for investment purposes upon the County Treasurer’s approval. However, such  withdrawals shall be made for the entire amount of the participant’s funds deposited in the  Pool. Upon completion of such withdrawals, the voluntary participants will no longer be able to  participate in the Pool or receive further services from the County Treasurer’s Office. NO partial  withdrawals from the Pool for investment purposes are permitted.   Please refer to Withdrawal of Funds Policy, which is maintained as a separate document, for  detailed guidelines and procedures.   19.0 TEMPORARY BORROWING OF POOL FUNDS  Section 6 of Article XVI of the California Constitution provides in part that "the treasurer of any  city, county, or city and county shall have power and the duty to make such temporary transfers  from the funds in custody as may be necessary to provide funds for meeting the obligations  incurred for maintenance purposes by city, county, city and county, district, or other political  subdivision whose funds are in custody and are paid out solely through the treasurer's office."  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 645 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 23   The County Auditor‐Controller and the County Treasurer shall make a temporary transfer of  funds to the requesting agency, not to exceed 85% of the amount of money which will accrue to  the agency during the fiscal year, provided that the amount of such transfer has been  determined by the County Auditor‐Controller to be transferable under the constitutional and  statutory provisions cited in Article XVI and has been certified by the County Treasurer‐Tax  Collector to be available. Such temporary transfer of funds shall not be made prior to the first  day of the fiscal year nor after the last Monday in April of the current fiscal year.  20.0 INVESTMENT OF BOND PROCEEDS  The County Treasurer shall invest bond proceeds using the standards of this Investment Policy.   The bond proceeds will be invested in securities permitted by the bond documents.  If the bond  documents are silent, the bond proceeds will be invested in securities permitted by this Policy.  21.0 DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN  The Contra Costa County Treasurer’s Disaster Recovery Plan includes critical phone numbers and  addresses of key personnel as well as active bankers and brokers/dealers.  Laptops, tablets,  smart phones, and other equivalent electronic devices shall be issued to key personnel for  communicating between staff, bank and broker/dealers.  Copies of the plan shall be distributed  to the investment staff: Assistant County Treasurer, the Treasurer’s Investment Officer, and the  Investment Operations Analyst.  The investment staff shall interact with one another by home  phone, cell phone, or e‐mail to decide an alternate location from which to conduct daily  operations.  In the event investment staff is unable to conduct normal business operations, the custodial  bank will automatically sweep all uninvested cash into an interest bearing account at the end of  the business day.  Until normal business operations have been restored, the limitations on the  size of an individual issuer and the percentage restrictions by investment type would be allowed  to exceed those approved in this investment policy.  22.0 POLICY CONSIDERATIONS  22.1 Exemption  Any investment currently held that does not meet the guidelines of this policy shall be  exempted from the requirements of this policy.  At maturity or liquidation, such monies shall be  reinvested only as provided by this policy.  22.2 Amendments  This policy shall be reviewed on an annual basis.  Any changes must be approved by the County  Treasurer and any other appropriate authority.     AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 646 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 24   AUTHORIZATION FOR LAIF INVESTMENTS         AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 647 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 25     APPROVED BROKERS    ABN AMRO, Incorporated  Alamo Capital  Bank of America Merrill Lynch  Bank of the West  Barclays Capital, Incorporated  California Arbitrage Management Program  Citigroup Global Markets  Credit Suisse  Daiwa Capital Markets America Inc.  Goldman, Sachs & Company  Government Perspectives  JP Morgan Securities LLC  Penserra Securities LLC  Prudential Securities, Incorporated  Public Financial Management, Incorporated  RBC Capital Markets, LLC  UBS Financial Services, Inc.  UnionBanc Investment Services  Wells Fargo Securities                      Note:  The County Treasury will not be limited to the above list.  Others will be included as long as all conditions for  authorized brokers and/or dealers set forth in this policy are met.  Additionally, deletions and additions are based  on many factors including the maintenance of required credit quality as rated by Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s  and other recognized rating services and reliable financial sources.      AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 648 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 26     APPROVED ISSUERS    Abbey National NA PepsiCo, Inc.  American Honda Finance PNC Bank NA  Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Prudential  Bank of Montreal Procter & Gamble Company  Bank of Nova Scotia Rabobank Nederland New York  BNP Paribas Royal Bank of Canada  Chevron Societe Generale North America  Coca‐Cola Co Standard Chartered Bank  Commonwealth Bank of Australia State Street Bank & Trust Co  Credit Agricole SA Svenska Handelsbanken AB  Deere & Company Toronto‐Dominion Bank  Deutsche Bank Financial LLC  Toyota Motor Credit Corp  Exxon Mobil UBS Financial  General Electric Capital Corp Union Bank  General Electric Co US Bankcorp  JPMorgan Chase & Co Walmart   John Deere Capital Corporation Walt Disney Company   Johnson  & Johnson Wells Fargo Bank NA  McDonald's Corporation Westpac Banking Corp  National Australia Bank Westamerica Bank  Nestle Capital Corp   Nordea Bank AB                  Note:  The County Treasury will not be limited to the above list in making investments. Other issuers may be  considered as the County Treasury will perform additional due diligence on each investment decision. The list does  not reflect the actual portfolio holdings managed by the County Treasury.     AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 649 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 27   APPROVED PRIMARY DEALERS      Bank of Nova Scotia, New York Agency  BMO Capital Markets Corp.  BNP Paribas Securities Corp.   Barclays Capital Inc.   Cantor Fitzgerald & Co.   Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.   Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC   Daiwa Capital Markets America Inc.   Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.   Goldman, Sachs & Co.   HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.   Jefferies & Company, Inc.   J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.   Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated   Mizuho Securities USA Inc.   Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated   Nomura Securities Inc.   RBC Capital Markets, LLC   RBS Securities Inc.   Societe Generale, New York Branch  TD Securities (USA) LLC  UBS Securities LLC.  Wells Fargo Securities, LLC                                            Note: The above list consists of primary dealers that serve as trading counterparties of the Federal Reserve Bank of  New York in its implementation of monetary policy. These primary dealers are required to participate in all  auctions of U.S. government debt. Treasury Staff will perform additional due diligence on each investment  decision, and hence, may or may not use the primary dealers listed above.     AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 650 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 28     CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE For the  TREASURER‐TAX COLLECTOR’S OFFICE     This Conflict of Interest Code is promulgated under the authority of the Political Reform Act, Government  Code §81000, et seq., which requires all state and local government agencies to adopt and promulgate conflict of  interest codes.  Section 18730 of Title 2, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations, as adopted by the Fair  Political Practices Commission (FPPC) contains the terms of a standard conflict of interest code, which may be  incorporated by reference and may be amended by the FPPC after public note and hearings to conform to  amendments in the Political Reform Act.   Therefore, the terms of Section 18730 of Title 2, Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations and any  amendments to it duly adopted by the FPPC are hereby incorporated by reference and, along with the below  stated Disclosure Categories, constitute the Conflict of Interest Code of the Treasurer‐Tax Collector’s Office of  Contra Costa County.   Employees in designated categories below shall file a Statement of Economic Interest (Form 700) with the  filing officer, who will make the statements available for public inspection and reproduction.  (California  Government Code §81008)  DESIGNATED POSITIONS  CLASS/JOB CODE TITLE ASSIGNED CATEGORY  County Treasurer‐Tax Collector 1  Assistant County Treasurer 1  Chief Deputy Treasurer‐Tax Collector 1  Treasurer’s Investment Officer 1  Treasurer’ Investment Operations Analyst 1  Tax Operations Supervisor 1  Treasurer Oversight Committee members 2    DISCLOSURE CATEGORIES  General Rule   An investment, interest in real property, or income is reportable if the business entity in which the investment  is held, the interest in real property, or the income or source of income may foreseeably be affected materially by  any decision made or participated in by the designated employee by virtue of the employee’s position.  1. Designated Employees in Category “1” must report:  a. All investments, interests in real property, and income, and any business entity in which the employee is a  director, officer, partner, trustee, employee, or hold any position in management.  Financial interests are  reportable only if located within Contra Costa County or if the business entity is doing business or  planning to do business in the County (and such plans are known by the designated employee) or has  done business within the County at any time during the two years prior to the filing of the statement.  b. Investments in any business entity, and income from any source and status as a director, officer, partner,  trustee, employee, or hold of a position of management in any business entity, which has within the last  two years contracted or foreseeably may contract with Contra Costa County, or with any special district or  other public agency within the County, to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment  to such County, district, or public agency.   2. Designated Employees in Category “2” must report:  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 651 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 29   Investments in any business entity, income from any source and status as a director, officer, partner,  trustee, employee or holder of a position of management in any business entity, which has within the last  two years contracted, or foreseeably may contract, with Contra Costa County to provide services,  supplies, materials, machinery or equipment to the Office the Treasurer‐Tax Collector.       AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 652 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 30     GLOSSARY OF TERMS  ACCRUED INTEREST The accumulated interest due on a bond as of the last interest payment made by  the issuer.  AGENCY  A debt security issued by a federal or federally sponsored agency.  Federal agencies are backed  by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.  Federally sponsored agencies (FSAs) are backed by  each particular agency with a market perception that there is an implicit government guarantee.  An  example of federal agency is the Government National mortgage Association (GNMA).  An example of a  FSA is the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA).  AMORTIZATION  The systematic reduction of the amount owed on a debt issue through periodic  payments of principal.  AVERAGE LIFE  The average length of time that an issue of serial bonds and/or term bonds with a  mandatory sinking fund feature is expected to be outstanding.  BANKERS ACCEPTANCES A time bill of exchange drawn on and accepted by a commercial bank to  finance the exchange of goods. When a bank “accepts” such a bill, the time draft becomes, in effect, a  predated, certified check payable to the bearer at some future specified date. The commercial bank  assumes primary liability once the draft is accepted.  BASIS POINT A unit of measurement used in the valuation of fixed‐income securities equal to 1/100 of  one percent of yield.  For example, if interest rates increase from 8.25% to 8.50%, the difference is  referred to as a 25‐basis‐point increase.  BENCHMARK  A comparative base for measuring the performance or risk tolerance of the investment  portfolio.  A benchmark should represent a close correlation to the level of risk and the average duration  of the portfolio’s investment.  BID  The indicated price at which a buyer is willing to purchase a security or commodity.  BLUE SKY LAWS Common term for state securities law, which vary from state to state. Generally refers  to provision related to prohibitions against fraud, dealer and broker regulations and securities  registration.  BOND  A bond is essentially a loan made by an investor to a division of the government, a government  agency or a corporation.  The bond is a promissory note to repay the loan in full at the end of a fixed  time period.  The date on which the principal must be repaid is called the maturity date or maturity.  In  addition, the issuer of the bond, that is the agency or corporation receiving the loan proceeds and  issuing the promissory note, agrees to make regular payments of interest at a rate initially stated on the  bond.  Bonds are rated according to many factors, including cost, degree of risk and rate of income.  BOOK VALUE  Refers to value of a held security as carried in the records of an investor. May differ from  current market value of the security.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 653 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 31   BROKER/DEALER  Any person engaged in the business of effecting transaction in securities in this state  for the account of others or for her/his own account.  Broker/dealer also includes a person engaged in  the regular business of issuing or guaranteeing options with regard to securities not of her/his own  issue.  CALLABLE BOND  A bond issue in which all or part of its outstanding principal amount may be redeemed  before maturity by the issuer under specified conditions.  CALL PRICE  The price at which an issuer may redeem a bond prior to maturity.  The price is usually at a  slight premium to the bond’s original issue price to compensate the holder for the loss of income and  ownership.  CALL RISK  The risk to the bondholder that a bond may be redeemed prior to maturity.  CASH SALE/PURCHASE  A transaction which calls for delivery and payment of securities on the same day  that the transaction is initiated.  CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT (CD) Certificates issued against funds deposited in a commercial bank for a  definite period of time and earning a specified rate of return. They are issued in two forms, negotiable  and non‐negotiable.  CLEAN UP CALL  An action of a debt instrument issuer requiring early redemption of the instrument to  reduce its own administrative expenses. This normally occurs when the principal outstanding is  significantly reduced to a small amount, e.g., less than 10% of the original issue.  COLLATERALIZATION  Process by which a borrower pledges securities, property, or other deposits for  the purpose of securing the repayment of a loan and/or security.  COMMERCIAL PAPER  Short‐term, unsecured promissory notes issued in either registered or bearer  form and usually backed by a line of credit with a bank. Maturities do not exceed 270 days and generally  average 30‐45 days.  CONVEXITY  A measure of a bond’s price sensitivity to changing interest rates.  A high convexity  indicates greater sensitivity of a bond’s price to interest rate changes.  COUPON RATE  The annual rate of interest received by an investor from the issuer of certain types of  fixed‐income securities.  Also known as the “interest rate.”  CREDIT QUALITY  The measurement of the financial strength of a bond issuer.  This measurement helps  an investor to understand an issuer’s ability to make timely interest payments and repay the loan  principal upon maturity.  Generally, the higher the credit quality of a bond issuer, the lower the interest  rate paid by the issuer because the risk of default is lower.  Credit quality ratings are provided by  nationally recognized rating agencies.  CREDIT RISK  The risk to an investor that an issuer will default in the payment of interest and/or  principal on a security.  CURRENT YIELD (CURRENT RETURN)  A yield calculation determined by dividing the annual interest  received on a security by the current market price of that security.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 654 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 32   CUSIP NUMBERS CUSIP is an acronym for Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures.  CUSIP numbers are identification numbers assigned each maturity of a security issue and usually printed  on the face of each individual security in the issue. The CUSIP numbers are intended to facilitate  identification and clearance of securities.  DELIVERY VERSUS PAYMENT (DVP)  A type of securities transaction in which the purchaser pays for the  securities when they are delivered either to the purchaser or his/her custodian.  DERIVATIVE SECURITY  Financial instrument created from, or whose value depends upon, one or more  underlying assets or indexes of asset values.  DISCOUNT  The amount by which the par value of a security exceeds the price paid for the security.  DIVERSIFICATION  A process of investing assets among a range of security types by sector, maturity, and  quality rating.  DURATION  A measure of the timing of the cash flows, such as the interest payments and the principal  repayment, to be received from a given fixed‐income security.  This calculation is based on three  variables: term to maturity, coupon rate, and yield to maturity.  The duration of a security is a useful  indicator of its price volatility for given changes in interest rates.  EARNINGS APPORTIONMENT  The quarterly interest distribution of the Pool Participants where the  actual investment costs incurred by the Treasurer are deducted from the interest earnings of the Pool  FAIR VALUE  The amount at which an investment could be exchanged in a current transaction between  willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.  FEDERAL FUNDS (FED FUNDS)  Funds placed in Federal Reserve banks by depository institutions in  excess of current reserve requirements.  These depository institutions may lend fed funds to each other  overnight or on a longer basis.  They may also transfer funds among each other on a same‐day basis  through the Federal Reserve banking system.  Fed funds are considered to be immediately available  funds.  FEDERAL FUNDS RATE  Interest rate charged by one institution lending federal funds to the other.  FEDERAL OPEN MARKET COMMITTEE (FOMC)  This committee sets Federal Reserve guidelines  regarding purchases and sales of government securities in the open market as a means of influencing  the volume of bank credit and money.  FIDUCIARY  An individual who holds something in trust for another and bears liability for its safekeeping.  FLOATING RATE NOTE  A debt security whose interest rate is reset periodically (monthly, quarterly,  annually) and is based on a market index (e.g., Treasury bills, LIBOR, etc.).  FUTURES  Commodities and other investments sold to be delivered at a future date.  GOVERNMENT SECURITIES  An obligation of the U.S. government, backed by the full faith and credit of  the government.  These securities are regarded as the highest quality of investment securities available  in the U.S. securities market.  See “Treasury Bills, Notes and Bonds.”  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 655 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 33   INTEREST RATE  See “Coupon Rate.”  INTERNAL CONTROLS  An internal control structure is designed to ensure that the assets of the  Treasurer’s Investment Pool are protected from loss, theft, or misuse, and to provide reasonable  assurance that this objective is met.  The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that (1) the cost of  a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived and (2) the valuation of costs and benefits  requires estimates and judgments by management.    Internal controls should address the following points:  1. Control of collusion—Collusion is a situation where two or more employees are working in  conjunction to defraud their employer.  2. Separation of transaction authority from accounting and record keeping—By separating the  person who authorizes or performs the transaction from the people who record or otherwise  account for the transaction, a separation of duties is achieved.  3. Custodial safekeeping—Securities purchased from a bank or dealer including appropriate  collateral (as defined by state law) shall be placed with an independent third party for custodial  safekeeping.  4. Avoidance of physical delivery securities—Book‐entry securities are much easier to transfer and  account for since actual delivery of a document never takes place.  Delivered securities must be  properly safeguarded against loss or destruction.  The potential for fraud and loss increases with  physically delivered securities.  5. Clear delegation of authority to subordinate staff members—Subordinate staff members must  have a clear understanding of their authority and responsibilities to avoid improper actions.  Clear  delegation of authority also preserves the internal control structure that is contingent on the  various staff positions and their respective responsibilities.  6. Written confirmation of transactions for investments and wire transfers—Due to the potential for  error and improprieties arising from telephone and electronic transactions, all transactions should  be supported by written communications and approved by the appropriate person.  Written  communications may be via fax if on letterhead and if the safekeeping institution has a list of  authorized signatures.  7. Development of a wire transfer agreement with the lead bank and third‐party custodian—The  designated official should ensure that an agreement will be entered into and will address the  following points: controls, security provisions, and responsibilities of each party making and  receiving wire transfers.  INVERSE FLOATERS An adjustable interest rate note keyed to various indices such as LIBOR, commercial  paper, federal funds, treasuries and derivative structures. The defined interest rate formula is the  opposite or inverse of these indices. Interest rates and pay dates may reset daily, weekly, monthly,  quarterly, semi‐annually or annually.  INVERTED YIELD CURVE  A chart formation that illustrates long‐term securities having lower yields than  short‐term securities.  This configuration usually occurs during periods of high inflation coupled with low  levels of confidence in the economy and a restrictive monetary policy.  INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940  Federal legislation which sets the standards by which investment  companies, such as mutual funds, are regulated in the areas of advertising, promotion, performance  reporting requirements, and securities valuations.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 656 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 34   INVESTMENT POLICY  A concise and clear statement of the objectives and parameters formulated by  the investor or investment manager for a portfolio of investment securities.  INVESTMENT‐GRADE OBLIGATIONS  An investment instrument suitable for purchase by institutional  investors under the prudent person rule.  Investment‐grade is restricted to those obligations rated BBB  or higher by a rating agency.  LIQUIDITY Usually refers to the ability to convert assets (such as investments) into cash.  LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF)  The State of California investment pool in which money of  local agencies is pooled as a method for managing and investing local funds.  MAKE WHOLE CALL A type of call provision on a bond allowing the borrower to pay off remaining debt  early. The borrower has to make a lump sum payment derived from a formula based on the net present  value of future coupon payments that will not be paid because of the call.  MARK TO MARKET Valuing the inventory of held securities at its current market value.  MARKET RISK  The risk that the value of a security will rise or decline as a result of changes in market  conditions.  MARKET VALUE Price at which a security can be traded in the current market.  MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT  A written contract covering all future transactions between the  parties to repurchase‐reverse repurchase agreements that establishes each party’s rights in the  transaction.  A master agreement will often specify, among other things, the right of the buyer‐lender to  liquidate the underlying securities in the event of default by the seller‐borrower.  MATURITY The date upon which the principal of a security becomes due and payable to the holder.  MEDIUM‐TERM NOTES (MTNS) Corporate debt obligations continuously offered in a broad range of  maturities. MTNs were created to bridge the gap between commercial paper and corporate bonds. The  key characteristic of MTNs is that they are issued on a continuous basis.  MONEY MARKET INSTRUMENTS Private and government obligations of one year or less.  MONEY MARKET MUTUAL FUNDS  Mutual funds that invest solely in money market instruments (short‐ term debt instruments, such as Treasury bills, commercial paper, banker’s acceptances, repos and  federal funds).  MUTUAL FUND  An investment company that pools money and can invest in a variety of securities,  including fixed‐income securities and money market instruments.  Mutual funds are regulated by the  Investment Company Act of 1940 and must abide by the following Securities and Exchange Commission  (SEC) disclosure guidelines:  1. Report standardized performance calculations.  2. Disseminate timely and accurate information regarding the fund’s holdings, performance,  management and general investment policy.  3. Have the fund’s investment policies and activities supervised by a board of trustees, which are  independent of the adviser, administrator or other vendor of the fund.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 657 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 35   4. Maintain the daily liquidity of the fund’s shares.  5. Value their portfolios on a daily basis.  6. Have all individuals who sell SEC‐registered products licensed with a self‐regulating organization  (SRO) such as the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD).  7. Have an investment policy governed by a prospectus which is updated and filed by the SEC  annually.  MUTUAL FUND STATISTICAL SERVICES  Companies that track and rate mutual funds, e.g.,  IBC/Donoghue, Lipper Analytical Services and Morningstar.  NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS (NASD)  A self‐regulatory organization (SRO) of  brokers and dealers in the over‐the counter securities business.  Its regulatory mandate includes  authority over firms that distribute mutual fund shares as well as other securities.  NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT May be sold by one holder to another prior to maturity. This is  possible because the issuing bank agrees to pay the amount of the deposit plus interest earned to the  bearer of the certificate at maturity.  NET ASSET VALUE  The market value of one share of an investment company, such as a mutual fund.   This figure is calculated by totaling a fund’s assets which includes securities, cash, and any accrued  earnings, subtracting this from the fund’s liabilities and dividing this total by the number of shares  outstanding.  This is calculated once a day based on the closing price for each security in the fund’s  portfolio. (See below)  [(Total assets) – (Liabilities]/(Number of shares outstanding)  NO LOAD FUND  A mutual fund which does not levy a sales charge on the purchase of its shares.  NOMINAL YIELD  The stated rate of interest that a bond pays its current owner, based on par value of  the security.  It is also known as the “coupon,” “coupon rate,” or “interest rate.”  NON‐NEGOTIABLE CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT  For public funds, these certificates are collateralized and  are not money market instruments since they cannot be traded in the secondary market. They are  issued on a fixed‐maturity basis and often pay higher interest rates than are permissible on other  savings or time‐deposit accounts.  OFFER The price of a security at which a person is willing to sell.  OPTION  A contract that provides the right, but not the obligation, to buy or to sell a specific amount of  a specific security within a predetermined time period.  A call option provides the right to buy the  underlying security.  A put option provides the right to sell the underlying security.  The seller of the  contracts is called the writer.  PAR  Face value of principal value of a bond, typically $1,000 per bond.  PAR VALUE The stated or face value of a security expressed as a specific dollar amount marked on the  face of the security; the amount of money due at maturity. Par value should not be confused with  market value.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 658 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 36   POSITIVE YIELD CURVE  A chart formation that illustrates short‐term securities having lower yields than  long‐term securities.  PREMIUM The amount by which the price paid for a security exceeds par value, generally representing  the difference between the nominal interest rate and the actual or effective return to the investor.  PRIME RATE  A preferred interest rate charged by commercial banks to their most creditworthy  customers.  Many interest rates are keyed to this rate.  PRINCIPAL  The face value or par value of a debt instrument.  Also may refer to the amount of capital  invested in a given security.  PROSPECTUS  A legal document that must be provided to any prospective purchaser of a new securities  offering registered with the SEC.  This can include information on the issuer, the issuer’s business, the  proposed use of proceeds, the experience of the issuer’s management, and certain certified financial  statements.  PRUDENT PERSON RULE  An investment standard outlining the fiduciary responsibilities of public funds  investors relating to investment practices.  RANGE NOTES A security whose rate of return is pegged to an index. The note defines the interest rate  minimum or floor and the interest rate maximum or cap. An example of an index may be federal funds.  The adjustable rate of interest is determined within the defined range of the funds.  RATE OF RETURN  The yield obtainable on a security based on its purchase price or its current market  price.  This may be the amortized yield to maturity on a bond and the current income return.  REINVESTMENT RISK  The risk that a fixed‐income investor will be unable to reinvest income proceeds  from a security holding at the same rate of return currently generated by that holding.  REPURCHASE AGREEMENT OR RP OR REPO An agreement consisting of two simultaneous transactions  whereby the investor purchases securities from a bank or dealer and the bank or dealer agrees to  repurchase the securities at the same price on a certain future date. The interest rate on a RP is that  which the dealer pays the investor for the use of his funds. Reverse repurchase agreements are the  mirror image of the RPs when the bank or dealer purchases securities from the investor under an  agreement to sell them back to the investor.  REVERSE REPURCHASE AGREEMENT (REVERSE REPO)  An agreement of one party to sell securities at a  specified price to a second party and a simultaneous agreement of the first party to repurchase the  securities at a specified price or at a specified later date.  RULE 2A‐7 OF THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT  Applies to all money market mutual funds and  mandates such funds to maintain certain standards, including a 13‐month maturity limit and a 90‐day  average maturity on investments, to help maintain a constant net asset value of one dollar ($1.00).  SAFEKEEPING  Holding of assets (e.g., securities) by a financial institution.  SECURITIES LENDING  A transaction wherein the Treasurer’s Pool transfers its securities to a  broker/dealer or other entities for collateral which may be cash or securities and simultaneously agrees  to return the collateral for the same securities in the future.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 659 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 37   SERIAL BOND  A bond issue, usually of a municipality, with various maturity dates scheduled at regular  intervals until the entire issue is retired.  SETTLEMENT DATE  The date used in price and interest computations, usually the date of delivery.  SINKING FUND  Money accumulated on a regular basis in a separate custodial account that is used to  redeem debt securities or preferred stock issues.  SLUGS  An acronym for State and Local Government Series. SLUGS are special United States Government  securities sold by the Secretary of the Treasury to states, municipalities and other local government  bodies through individual subscription agreements. The interest rates and maturities of SLUGS are  arranged to comply with arbitrage restrictions imposed under Section 103 of the Internal Revenue Code.  SLUGS are most commonly used for deposit in escrow in connection with the issuance of refunding  bonds.  STRIPS  US Treasury acronym for “separate trading of registered interest and principal of securities."  Certain registered Treasury securities can be divided into separate interest and principal components,  which may then be traded as separate entities.  SUPRANATIONAL Supranational is an international organization, or union, whereby member states  transcend national boundaries or interests to share in the decision‐making and vote on issues pertaining  to the wider grouping. Examples of supranational are International Bank for Reconstruction and  Development, International Finance Corporation, European Union, and World Trade Organization.  SWAP  Generally refers to an exchange of securities, with essentially the same par value, but may vary in  coupon rate, type of instrument, name of issuer and number of days to maturity. The purpose of the  SWAP may be to enhance yield, to shorten the maturity or any benefit deemed by the contracting  parties.  TERM BONDS  Bonds comprising a large part or all of a particular issue which come due in a single  maturity.  The issuer usually agrees to make periodic payments into a sinking fund for mandatory  redemption of term bonds before maturity.  TOTAL RETURN  The sum of all investment income plus changes in the capital value of the portfolio.  For  mutual funds, return on an investment is composed of share price appreciation plus any realized  dividends or capital gains.  This is calculated by taking the following components during a certain time  period: (Price Appreciation) + (Dividends paid) + (Capital gains) = Total Return  TREASURY SECURITIES  Debt obligations of the United States Government sold by the Treasury  Department in the form of bills, notes and bonds:  1. Bills Short‐term obligations that mature in one year or less and are sold at a discount in lieu of  paying periodic interest.  2. Notes Interest‐bearing obligations that mature between one year and 10 years.  3. Bonds Interest‐bearing long‐term obligations that generally mature in 10 years or more.  UNIFORM NET CAPITAL RULE  SEC Rule 15C3‐1 outlining capital requirements for broker/dealers.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 660 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ANNUAL INVESTMENT POLICY FY 2016‐2017 Page 38   U.S. AGENCY OBLIGATIONS  Federal agency or United States government‐sponsored enterprise  obligations, participants, or other instruments.  The obligations are issued by or fully guaranteed as to  principal and interest by federal agencies or United States government‐sponsored enterprises.  U.S. TREASURY OBLIGATIONS  Securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and backed by the full faith and  credit of the United States.  Treasuries are considered to have no credit risk and are the benchmark for  interest rates on all other securities in the U.S. and overseas.  The Treasury issues both discounted  securities and fixed coupon notes and bonds.  VOLATILITY  A degree of fluctuation in the price and valuation of securities.  “VOLATILITY RISK” RATING  A rating system to clearly indicate the level of volatility and other non‐credit  risks associated with securities and certain bond funds.  The ratings for bond funds range from those  that have extremely low sensitivity to changing market conditions and offer the greatest stability of the  returns (“S1+” by S&P) to those that are highly sensitive with currently identifiable market volatility risk  (“S6” by S&P).  WEIGHTED AVERAGE MATURITY (WAM)  The average maturity of all the securities that comprise a  portfolio.  According to SEC rule 2a‐7, the WAM for SEC registered money market mutual funds may not  exceed 90 days and no one security may have a maturity that exceeds 397 days.  WHEN ISSUED (WI)  A conditional transaction in which an authorized new security has not been issued.   All “when issued” transactions are settled when the actual security is issued.  YIELD  The current rate of return on an investment security generally expressed as a percentage of the  security’s current price.  YIELD‐TO‐CALL (YTC)  The rate of return an investor earns from a bond assuming the bond is redeemed  (called) prior to its nominal maturity date.  YIELD CURVE  A graphic representation that depicts the relationship at a given point in time between  yields and maturity for bonds that are identical in every way except maturity.  A normal yield curve may  be alternatively referred to as a positive yield curve.  YIELD‐TO‐MATURITY  The rate of return yielded by a debt security held to maturity when both interest  payments and the investor’s potential capital gain or loss are included in the calculation of return.  ZERO‐COUPON SECURITY A security that makes no periodic interest payments but instead is sold at a  discount from its face value.  AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 661 RECOMMENDATION(S): ACCEPT the Treasurer’s Quarterly Investment Report as of March 31, 2016, as recommended by the County Treasurer-Tax Collector. FISCAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 53646 requires the County Treasurer to prepare quarterly reports to the Board of Supervisors describing County investments including type, par value, cost, and market value. Attached please find the report covering the period January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016. As of March 31, 2016, the par value, cost, and market value of Contra Costa County Investment Pool were $3,288,022,252.07, $3,287,003,654.96, and $3,292,381,060.95, respectively. The weighted yield to maturity was 0.77% and the weighted average days to maturity were 225 days. As of March 31, 2016, The Treasurer’s investment portfolio was in compliance with Government Code 53600 et. seq. and with the Treasurer’s current investment policy. Historical activities combined with future cash flow projections indicate that the County has sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations for the next six months. APPROVE OTHER RECOMMENDATION OF CNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE Action of Board On: 08/02/2016 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER Clerks Notes: VOTE OF SUPERVISORS AYE:John Gioia, District I Supervisor Candace Andersen, District II Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, District III Supervisor Karen Mitchoff, District IV Supervisor Federal D. Glover, District V Supervisor Contact: Brice Bins, (925) 957-2848 I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: August 2, 2016 David J. Twa, County Administrator and Clerk of the Board of Supervisors By: Stephanie Mello, Deputy cc: C. 79 To:Board of Supervisors From:Russell Watts, Treasurer-Tax Collector Date:August 2, 2016 Contra Costa County Subject:Treasurer's Quarterly Investment Report as of March 31, 2016 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 662 ATTACHMENTS Quarterly Report 3/31/2016 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 663 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TREASURER’S QUARTERLY INVESTMENT REPORT AS OF MARCH 31, 2016 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 664 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Executive Summary 1 II. Contra Costa County Investment Pool Summary 2 III. Appendix A. Investment Portfolio Detail—Managed by Treasurer’s Office 1. Portfolio Summary 5 2. Portfolio Detail 9 3. Market Valuation Sources 37 B. Investment Portfolio Detail – Managed by Outside Contracted Parties 1. State of California Local Agency Investment Fund a. Summary 38 2. Asset Management Funds a. Wells Capital Management 39 b. CalTRUST 76 3. East Bay Regional Communications System Authority (EBRCS) a. Summary 81 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 665 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  The Treasurer's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code 53600 et. seq..  The Treasurer's investment portfolio is in compliance with the Treasurer's current investment policy.  The Treasurer’s investment portfolio has no securities lending, reverse repurchase agreements or derivatives.  As of 3/31/16, the fair value of the Treasurer’s investment portfolio was 100.16% of the cost. More than 79 percent of the portfolio or over $2.60 billion will mature in less than a year. Historical activities combined with future cash flow projections indicate that the County is able to meet its cash flow needs for the next six months.  Treasurer’s Investment Portfolio Characteristics Par $3,288,022,252.07 Cost $3,287,003,654.96 Market Value $3,292,381,060.95 Weighted Yield to Maturity 0.77% Weighted Average Days to Maturity 225 days Weighted Duration 0.62 year AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 666 PERCENT OF TYPE PAR VALUE COST FAIR VALUE TOTAL COST A. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office 1. U.S. Treasuries (STRIPS, Bills, Notes)$33,425,000.00 $33,553,790.46 $33,711,450.60 1.02% 2. U.S. Agencies Federal Home Loan Banks 240,490,000.00 241,204,325.09 241,505,312.52 7.34% Federal National Mortgage Association 93,836,000.00 94,299,736.93 94,612,810.15 2.87% Federal Farm Credit Banks 181,305,000.00 181,109,502.09 181,840,842.68 5.51% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 134,219,000.00 134,442,435.25 134,728,943.20 4.09% Municipal Bonds 3,645,000.00 3,777,157.78 1 3,777,157.78 1 0.11% Subtotal 653,495,000.00 654,833,157.14 656,465,066.33 19.92% 3. Supranationals - International Government 15,000,000.00 14,981,491.67 15,002,150.00 0.46% 4. Money Market Instruments Commercial Paper 1,021,430,000.00 1,018,109,635.92 1,020,277,944.26 30.97% Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 830,915,000.00 830,912,285.49 831,660,238.36 25.28% Medium Term Certificates of Deposit 2,175,000.00 2,175,000.00 1 2,175,000.00 1 0.07% Money Market Accounts 565,318.32 565,318.32 565,318.32 0.02% Time Deposit 3,335.77 3,335.77 3,335.77 0.00% Subtotal 1,855,088,654.09 1,851,765,575.50 1,854,681,836.71 56.34% 5. Asset Backed Securities/Mortgage Backed Securities 5,140,142.14 5,149,021.35 1 5,149,021.35 1 0.16% 6. Corporate Notes 140,882,000.00 141,467,496.42 142,075,630.23 4.30% TOTAL (Section A.)2,703,030,796.23 2,701,750,532.54 2,707,085,155.22 82.19% B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors 1. Local Agency Investment Fund 194,240,588.39 194,240,588.39 194,283,527.21 2 5.91% 2. Other a. EBRCS Bond 2,232,756.90 2,232,756.90 2,232,756.90 0.07% b. Wells Capital Management 44,251,467.61 44,513,134.19 44,512,978.68 3 1.35% c. CalTRUST (Short-Term Fund)133,610,734.91 133,610,734.91 133,610,734.91 4.06% Subtotal 180,094,959.42 180,356,626.00 180,356,470.49 5.49% TOTAL (Section B.)374,335,547.81 374,597,214.39 374,639,997.70 11.40% C. Cash 210,655,908.03 210,655,908.03 210,655,908.03 6.41% 4GRAND TOTAL (FOR A , B, & C)$3,288,022,252.07 $3,287,003,654.96 $3,292,381,060.95 100.00% Notes: 1. Fair Value equals Cost less Purchase Interest 2. Estimated Fair Value 3. Base Market Value plus Accrued Interest 4. Does not include the Futuris Public Entity Trust of the Contra Costa Community College District Retirement Board of Authority CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL As of March 31, 2016 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 667 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL AT A GLANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2016 NOTES TO INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO SUMMARY AND AT A GLANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2016 1. All report information is unaudited but due diligence was utilized in its preparation. 2. There may be slight differences between the portfolio summary page and the attached exhibits and statements for investments managed by outside contractors or trustees. The variance is due to the timing difference in recording transactions associated with outside contracted parties during interim periods and later transmitted to the appropriate county agency and/or the Treasurer’s Office. In general, the Treasurer’s records reflect booked costs at the beginning of a period. 3. All securities and amounts included in the portfolio are denominated in United States Dollars. 4. The Contra Costa County investment portfolio maintains Standard & Poor's highest credit quality rating of AAAf and lowest volatility of S1+. The portfolio consists of a large portion of short-term investments with credit rating of A-1/P-1 or better. The majority of the long-term investments in the portfolio are rated AA or better. 5. In accordance with Contra Costa County's Investment Policy, the Treasurer's Office has constructed a portfolio that safeguards the principal, meets the liquidity needs and achieves a return. As a result, more than 79% of the portfolio will mature in less than a year with a weighted average maturity of 225 days. U.S. Treasuries 1.02% U.S.Agencies- Federal, State and Local 19.92% Supranationals 0.46% Money Market 56.34% ABS/MBS 0.16% Corporate Notes 4.30%Outside Contractors-LAIF 5.91% Outside Contractors-Other 5.49% Cash 6.41% PORTFOLIO BREAKDOWN BY INVESTMENT 79.21% 9.65% 8.77% 2.08% 0.29% $0 $500,000,000 $1,000,000,000 $1,500,000,000 $2,000,000,000 $2,500,000,000 $3,000,000,000 1 yr & less 1 to 2 yrs 2 to 3 yrs 3 to 4 yrs 4+ yrs MATURITY DISTRIBUTION AAA 0.81% AA+ 22.27% AA 10.80% AA‐ 1.42% A+ 1.01% A 0.82% A‐ 0.28% A‐1+ 13.12% A‐1 42.80% NR (CASH) 6.41% NR (Misc.) 0.16% BBB+ 0.10% PORTFOLIO CREDIT QUALITY 0.767% 0.825% 0.470% 0.726%0.690% 0.350% 0.00% 0.10% 0.20% 0.30% 0.40% 0.50% 0.60% 0.70% 0.80% 0.90% Total Treasurer LAIF Wells CalTRUST Cash YIELD TO MATURITY BY PORTFOLIO Note: Total is  100% of the portfolio; Treasurer‐82%; LAIF‐6%; Wells Cap‐1%;  CalTRUST‐4%  and Cash‐7% 0.00% 0.10% 0.20% 0.30% 0.40% 0.50% 0.60% 0.70% 0.80% 0.90% 6/13 9/13 12/13 3/14 6/14 9/14 12/14 3/15 6/15 9/15 12/15 3/16 QUARTERLY WEIGHTED YIELD TO MATURITY YTM County&Agencies 46.39% School Dist. 37.61% Community College  Dist. 10.67% Voluntary  Participants 5.33% POOL BALANCE BY PARTICIPANTS Note: More than 41% of the School Dist. funds from the bond proceeds AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 668 Note:All data provided by BloombergMAJOR MARKET AND ECONOMIC DATAAS OF MARCH 31, 201601234567803/96 03/99 03/02 03/05 03/08 03/11 03/14PercentageTREASURY YIELDS AND FED TARGET RATEUS 2‐YR TREASURY YIELDUS 5‐YR TREASURY YIELDFEDERAL FUND TARGET RATE‐10‐8‐6‐4‐2024681003/31/1603/31/1303/31/1003/31/0703/31/0403/31/0103/31/98PercentageGROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCTGDP QoQ Change‐2‐10123456Mar‐16Mar‐14Mar‐12Mar‐10Mar‐08Mar‐06Mar‐04Mar‐02Mar‐00Mar‐98Mar‐96PercentageCONSUMER PRICE INDEX CPI YoY ChangeCore CPI YoY Change02468101214161820Mar‐97 Mar‐99 Mar‐01 Mar‐03 Mar‐05 Mar‐07 Mar‐09 Mar‐11 Mar‐13 Mar‐15PercentageEMPLOYMENT RELATED RATESUnemployment RateUnderemployment RateAUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES669 SECTION III APPENDIX A. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL - MANAGED BY TREASURER’S OFFICE AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 670 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:13:51 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 1 of 4 Subtotal .476060 1,249,000.00 1,244,960.00 1,365.40 284.58 .478368 1,243,310.02 99.676541 0.00 Inv Type: 28 FHLMC DISCOUNT NOTES Subtotal 1.057598 179,835,000.00 180,373,875.29 497,333.82 750,172.70 1.096207 179,646,448.34 100.299650 -13,418.33 Inv Type: 27 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 1.286552 1,015,046.90 100.999692 0.00 Subtotal 1.616771 1,005,000.00 1,015,046.90 1,354.09 0.00 Inv Type: 26 AGENCY ABS FXD-M 30/360 Subtotal 1.264545 93,541,000.00 94,318,255.60 234,530.88 536,945.97 1.094691 94,005,848.10 100.830925 -206,204.03 Inv Type: 23 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSO Subtotal 1.035377 238,495,000.00 239,510,988.05 660,013.96 906,386.95 .901655 239,210,457.53 100.426000 -581,071.70 Inv Type: 22 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS Subtotal 1.140685 33,425,000.00 33,711,450.60 78,896.37 172,775.62 1.033813 33,553,790.46 100.856995 -5,312.86 Inv Type: 12 TREASURY NOTES Subtotal 1.123304 15,000,000.00 15,002,150.00 34,493.06 27,950.00 1.188840 14,981,491.67 100.014333 0.00 Inv Type: 1 SUPRANATIONALS Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 671 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:13:51 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 2 of 4 Subtotal 1.020000 600,000.00 599,179.69 663.00 0.00 1.083588 599,179.69 99.863282 0.00 Inv Type: 53 CREDIT ABS FXD-SA 30/360 Subtotal 1.165369 3,535,142.14 3,534,794.76 1,891.47 0.00 1.169942 3,534,794.76 99.990174 0.00 Inv Type: 50 AUTO ABS FXD-M 30/360 Subtotal .305000 1,995,000.00 1,994,324.47 236.63 220.28 .305173 1,993,867.56 99.966139 0.00 Inv Type: 43 FHLB DISCOUNT NOTES Subtotal .472739 1,470,000.00 1,466,967.39 3,511.50 402.14 .475034 1,463,053.75 99.793700 0.00 Inv Type: 42 FARM CREDIT DISCOUNT NOTES Subtotal .400000 295,000.00 294,554.55 665.39 0.33 .401514 293,888.83 99.849000 0.00 Inv Type: 41 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES Subtotal 2.073550 3,645,000.00 3,777,157.78 21,213.39 0.00 1.186956 3,777,157.78 103.625728 0.00 Inv Type: 31 MUNICIPAL BONDS Subtotal 1.044983 132,970,000.00 133,483,983.20 216,634.39 438,724.07 .965055 133,199,125.23 100.386541 -143,431.20 Inv Type: 29 FHLMC NOTES Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 672 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:13:51 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 3 of 4 Subtotal .000000 565,318.32 565,318.32 0.00 0.00 .000000 565,318.32 100.000000 0.00 Inv Type: 99 MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS Subtotal .907591 3,515,000.00 3,515,000.00 3,682.31 0.00 .907591 3,515,000.00 100.000000 0.00 Inv Type: 80 YCD / NCD QTR FLTR Subtotal 1.265482 8,600,000.00 8,596,780.00 36,670.44 0.00 1.278261 8,596,780.00 99.962558 0.00 Inv Type: 79 YCD/NCD 30/360 1.412982 141,467,496.42 100.847255 -262,638.80 Subtotal 1.640603 140,882,000.00 142,075,630.23 508,500.78 887,432.91 Inv Type: 75 CORPORATE NOTES Subtotal 1.000000 2,175,000.00 2,175,000.00 9,727.08 0.00 1.000000 2,175,000.00 100.000000 0.00 Inv Type: 74 CERT OF DEPOSIT MEDIUM TERM Subtotal .736193 818,800,000.00 819,548,458.36 1,385,638.35 747,952.87 .736041 818,800,505.49 100.091409 0.00 Inv Type: 72 NEGOTIABLE CERT OF DEPOSIT Subtotal .686354 1,021,430,000.00 1,020,277,944.26 1,586,442.98 581,962.58 .688715 1,018,109,635.92 99.887211 -97.22 Inv Type: 71 COMMERCIAL PAPER DISCOUNT Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 673 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:13:51 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 4 of 4 .600000 3,335.77 100.000000 0.00 Subtotal .600000 3,335.77 3,335.77 37.69 0.00 Inv Type: 1000 TD WITH CALC CODE OF CSC-00 Grand Total Count 415 .857579 2,703,030,796.23 2,707,085,155.22 5,283,502.98 5,051,211.00 .825117 2,701,750,532.54 100.149993 -1,212,174.14 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 674 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 1 of 28 82679 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828VJ6 09/03/2015 1.875000 195,000.00 200,965.05 924.11 2,575.40 04/15/2018 .921899 2,680,500.09 99.965000 SUNGARD 0.00 06/30/2020 1.499897 198,389.65 103.059000 SUNGARD 0.00 03/31/2018 .860670 1,695,351.56 99.992000 SUNGARD 0.00 82710 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828UU2 09/29/2015 .750000 1,700,000.00 1,699,864.00 34.83 4,512.44 82670 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828K25 08/21/2015 .750000 2,690,000.00 2,689,058.50 9,315.78 8,558.41 82577 CCCCD GOV US TREAS 912828ND8 05/29/2015 3.500000 240,000.00 262,903.20 3,184.62 75.07 04/30/2019 1.138894 5,021,875.00 101.074000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/15/2020 1.503393 262,828.13 109.543000 SUNGARD 0.00 07/31/2018 1.111402 976,449.50 103.344000 SUNGARD 0.00 82597 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828QY9 07/06/2015 2.250000 945,000.00 976,600.80 3,563.22 151.30 03/31/2017 .545225 1,691,418.75 100.367000 SUNGARD -5,253.15 82711 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828SM3 09/29/2015 1.000000 1,680,000.00 1,686,165.60 45.90 0.00 82003 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828SY7 06/05/2014 .625000 365,000.00 364,784.65 766.65 1,209.93 05/31/2017 .818703 363,574.72 99.941000 SUNGARD 0.00 82056 CCCCD GOV US TREAS 912828VQ0 07/31/2014 1.375000 270,000.00 273,607.20 622.17 4,131.02 82512 RM GOV US TREASURY 912828ST8 04/15/2015 1.250000 5,000,000.00 5,053,700.00 26,270.60 31,825.00 81994 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828PK0 05/09/2014 2.250000 100,000.00 102,496.00 756.15 566.32 11/30/2017 1.165963 101,929.68 102.496000 SUNGARD 0.00 07/31/2018 1.446611 269,476.18 101.336000 SUNGARD 0.00 07/31/2018 .916641 86,195.31 101.336000 SUNGARD -59.71 82460 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828F39 03/27/2015 1.750000 360,000.00 369,352.80 17.21 3,924.67 09/30/2019 1.403864 365,428.13 102.598000 SUNGARD 0.00 82182 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828TB6 11/03/2014 .750000 2,860,000.00 2,862,688.40 5,421.43 5,107.97 06/30/2017 .788660 2,857,580.43 100.094000 SUNGARD 0.00 82377 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828VQ0 02/04/2015 1.375000 85,000.00 86,135.60 195.84 0.00 Inv Type: 12 TREASURY NOTES 82978 SUP INTL BK RECON &459058EV1 03/10/2016 1.250000 5,000,000.00 5,012,150.00 10,937.50 27,950.00 01/11/2018 1.110364 9,990,000.00 99.900000 BOOK 0.00 82880 SUP INTL BK RECON &45905UUM4 01/06/2016 1.060000 10,000,000.00 9,990,000.00 23,555.56 0.00 07/26/2019 1.345903 4,991,491.67 100.243000 SUNGARD 0.00 1.188840 14,981,491.67 100.014333 0.00 Subtotal 1.123304 15,000,000.00 15,002,150.00 34,493.06 27,950.00 Inv Type: 1 SUPRANATIONALS Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 675 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 2 of 28 06/10/2016 .745089 2,993,104.40 100.321000 SUNGARD -143,988.00 80662 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313373SZ6 06/20/2012 2.125000 2,840,000.00 2,849,116.40 18,607.92 0.00 80648 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313373SZ6 06/11/2012 2.125000 1,895,000.00 1,901,082.95 12,416.20 0.00 06/10/2016 .760030 1,996,647.80 100.321000 SUNGARD -95,564.85 Inv Type: 22 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS 04/30/2020 1.246765 206,816.71 101.035000 SUNGARD 0.00 82968 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828H52 03/04/2016 1.250000 125,000.00 125,860.00 261.85 791.64 07/31/2019 1.107137 595,360.15 99.762000 SUNGARD 0.00 82933 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828K58 02/03/2016 1.375000 205,000.00 207,121.75 1,184.80 1,040.70 01/31/2020 1.235552 125,210.02 100.688000 SUNGARD 0.00 83010 CCCCD GOV US TREAS 912828XM7 03/31/2016 1.625000 170,000.00 173,367.70 462.95 545.43 07/31/2020 1.230437 173,277.63 101.981000 SUNGARD 0.00 83009 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828WL0 03/31/2016 1.500000 1,415,000.00 1,440,314.35 7,132.99 2,873.33 05/31/2019 .989916 1,444,516.02 101.789000 SUNGARD 0.00 82932 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828TH3 02/03/2016 .875000 600,000.00 598,572.00 879.81 3,255.12 82819 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828L40 12/04/2015 1.000000 6,250,000.00 6,279,812.50 2,887.23 55,691.41 10/31/2018 1.148190 1,745,028.59 101.086000 SUNGARD 0.00 82754 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828RH5 10/14/2015 1.375000 3,920,000.00 3,975,428.80 147.27 5,816.30 09/30/2018 .940653 3,969,612.50 101.414000 SUNGARD 0.00 82789 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828WD8 11/09/2015 1.250000 1,740,000.00 1,758,896.40 9,142.17 14,405.58 09/30/2019 1.230157 188,707.23 102.598000 SUNGARD 0.00 82755 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828F39 10/14/2015 1.750000 185,000.00 189,806.30 8.85 1,099.07 02/29/2020 1.550966 118,500.00 100.652000 SUNGARD 0.00 82786 CCCCD GOV US TREAS 912828UQ1 11/09/2015 1.250000 120,000.00 120,782.40 130.43 2,282.40 10/31/2020 1.682647 150,982.12 102.457000 SUNGARD 0.00 82901 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828WC0 01/11/2016 1.750000 150,000.00 153,685.50 1,103.36 3,222.61 05/31/2017 .895064 368,892.32 99.941000 SUNGARD 0.00 82902 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828SY7 01/11/2016 .625000 370,000.00 369,781.70 777.15 1,154.75 07/15/2018 1.193332 1,478,301.17 100.184000 SUNGARD 0.00 82820 CCCCD GOV US TREASU 912828VF4 12/04/2015 1.375000 195,000.00 196,957.80 901.07 3,519.32 09/15/2018 1.151627 6,224,121.09 100.477000 SUNGARD 0.00 82900 CCCSIG GOV US TREAS 912828XK1 01/11/2016 .875000 1,490,000.00 1,492,741.60 2,757.93 14,440.43 05/31/2020 1.560386 193,467.78 101.004000 SUNGARD 0.00 Subtotal 1.140685 33,425,000.00 33,711,450.60 78,896.37 172,775.62 1.033813 33,553,790.46 100.856995 -5,312.86 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 676 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 3 of 28 82315 CCCCD GOV FHLB NOTE 313371PV2 01/21/2015 1.625000 6,165,000.00 6,207,291.90 31,167.49 0.00 01/06/2017 .750000 10,000,000.00 100.113000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/09/2016 .571735 6,286,450.50 100.686000 SUNGARD -79,158.60 09/28/2016 .470201 765,382.50 99.995000 SUNGARD -420.75 82316 CCCCD GOV FHLB NOTE 3130A2T97 01/21/2015 .500000 765,000.00 764,961.75 31.88 0.00 82281 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3UR3 01/06/2015 .750000 10,000,000.00 10,011,300.00 17,708.33 11,300.00 82275 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3TA2 12/30/2014 1.000000 10,000,000.00 10,041,600.00 12,777.78 41,600.00 12/12/2016 .770206 4,993,150.00 100.142000 SUNGARD 0.00 08/15/2017 1.000000 10,000,000.00 100.416000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/08/2017 1.180284 4,492,800.00 100.570000 SUNGARD 0.00 82280 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3HF4 12/29/2014 1.125000 4,500,000.00 4,525,650.00 15,890.64 32,850.00 09/28/2016 .470153 11,475,735.00 99.995000 SUNGARD -6,308.50 82321 CCCCD GOV FHLB NOTE 3130A2T97 01/21/2015 .500000 11,470,000.00 11,469,426.50 477.92 0.00 82322 CCCCD GOV FHLB NOTE 313371PV2 01/21/2015 1.625000 19,275,000.00 19,407,226.50 97,445.85 0.00 82400 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3133782M2 02/25/2015 1.500000 5,000,000.00 5,082,800.00 4,791.67 66,200.00 12/09/2016 .571735 19,654,717.50 100.686000 SUNGARD -247,491.00 06/10/2016 .475000 2,495,049.83 99.996000 SUNGARD 0.00 82012 RM GOV FEDERAL HOME 3130A2C61 06/13/2014 .375000 2,500,000.00 2,499,900.00 2,890.62 4,850.17 82038 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313379DT3 07/15/2014 1.250000 6,205,000.00 6,256,563.55 24,346.01 84,450.05 82053 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313379DT3 07/28/2014 1.250000 3,000,000.00 3,024,930.00 11,770.83 42,930.00 06/08/2018 1.390090 6,172,113.50 100.831000 SUNGARD 0.00 80907 WT GOV FHLB NOTES 313380EC7 10/10/2012 .750000 170,000.00 169,911.60 81.47 239.70 82271 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3Q64 12/23/2014 .700000 5,000,000.00 5,007,100.00 10,597.22 13,950.00 09/08/2017 .790076 169,671.90 99.948000 SUNGARD 0.00 06/19/2017 .850065 2,888,800.00 100.378000 SUNGARD -2,932.50 82000 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313379VE6 06/02/2014 1.010000 2,875,000.00 2,885,867.50 8,227.29 0.00 06/08/2018 1.410094 2,982,000.00 100.831000 SUNGARD 0.00 82255 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3PC2 12/12/2014 .650000 5,000,000.00 5,000,850.00 9,840.28 7,800.00 12/16/2016 .620043 2,493,725.00 99.935000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/12/2016 .720127 4,993,050.00 100.017000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/12/2016 .670252 3,502,065.00 100.142000 SUNGARD 0.00 82256 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3Q64 12/12/2014 .700000 3,500,000.00 3,504,970.00 7,418.06 2,905.00 09/19/2017 1.200000 5,000,000.00 100.737000 SUNGARD 0.00 82122 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A33J1 09/19/2014 1.200000 5,000,000.00 5,036,850.00 2,000.00 36,850.00 82187 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3CE2 11/05/2014 .625000 10,000,000.00 10,006,900.00 28,993.06 0.00 82189 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3EW0 11/07/2014 .500000 2,500,000.00 2,498,375.00 3,645.82 4,650.00 10/14/2016 .572077 10,010,200.00 100.069000 SUNGARD -3,300.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 677 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 4 of 28 82664 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A6B63 08/14/2015 1.200000 10,000,000.00 10,080,100.00 15,666.67 80,100.00 08/28/2017 .858202 294,439.27 100.044000 SUNGARD 0.00 08/14/2018 1.200000 10,000,000.00 100.801000 SUNGARD 0.00 09/13/2019 1.400130 2,497,575.00 100.991000 SUNGARD 0.00 82694 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313380FB8 09/21/2015 1.375000 2,500,000.00 2,524,775.00 1,718.75 27,200.00 82637 CCCSIG GOV FHLB 3130A62S5 07/24/2015 .750000 295,000.00 295,129.80 202.83 690.53 82590 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A5JD2 06/29/2015 1.100000 10,000,000.00 10,037,600.00 28,111.11 37,600.00 06/29/2018 1.100000 10,000,000.00 100.376000 SUNGARD 0.00 06/24/2016 .330927 250,105.00 99.999000 SUNGARD -107.50 82619 CLT GOV FHLB NOTES 3133834R9 07/10/2015 .375000 250,000.00 249,997.50 252.60 0.00 12/08/2017 1.150014 10,002,075.00 100.570000 SUNGARD 0.00 11/02/2018 1.150000 5,000,000.00 100.823000 SUNGARD 0.00 82781 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A6RC3 11/04/2015 1.150000 5,000,000.00 5,041,150.00 23,479.17 41,150.00 82848 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A6SW8 12/21/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 10,038,400.00 28,333.34 45,300.00 82875 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3HF4 12/30/2015 1.125000 10,000,000.00 10,057,000.00 35,312.50 61,800.00 12/19/2017 1.035037 9,993,655.56 100.384000 SUNGARD 0.00 82437 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 3133782N0 03/16/2015 .875000 3,000,000.00 3,006,210.00 1,531.25 0.00 03/06/2017 .802655 9,983,700.00 100.042000 SUNGARD 0.00 03/10/2017 .739127 3,008,010.00 100.207000 SUNGARD -1,800.00 04/20/2016 .300251 1,609,195.00 100.005000 SUNGARD 0.00 82503 PW GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A4ZY1 04/21/2015 .250000 1,610,000.00 1,610,080.50 1,800.07 885.50 03/08/2019 1.415035 5,016,600.00 101.656000 SUNGARD 0.00 10/30/2018 1.300000 5,000,000.00 100.806000 SUNGARD 0.00 82408 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A4GJ5 03/04/2015 1.125000 10,000,000.00 10,075,800.00 48,750.00 85,100.00 82419 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A4K27 03/09/2015 .720000 10,000,000.00 10,004,200.00 5,000.00 20,500.00 04/25/2018 1.155323 9,990,700.00 100.758000 SUNGARD 0.00 82550 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A57K9 05/04/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 9,996,400.00 40,833.33 11,200.00 06/30/2017 .730000 10,000,000.00 100.155000 SUNGARD 0.00 82579 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A5HF9 06/01/2015 .730000 10,000,000.00 10,015,500.00 18,452.74 15,500.00 82582 RM GOV FHLB NOTES 313379EE5 06/08/2015 1.625000 2,500,000.00 2,549,700.00 12,074.65 43,700.00 82583 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A5NC9 06/11/2015 1.300000 5,000,000.00 5,040,300.00 27,263.91 40,300.00 06/14/2019 1.563094 2,506,000.00 101.988000 SUNGARD 0.00 82552 GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A5DD8 05/07/2015 .720000 10,000,000.00 10,022,300.00 25,000.00 22,300.00 05/04/2018 1.050244 9,985,200.00 99.964000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/26/2017 .720000 10,000,000.00 100.223000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/30/2017 .666017 1,428,813.10 99.937000 SUNGARD 0.00 82561 CCCSIG GOV FHLB 3130A5EP0 05/15/2015 .625000 1,430,000.00 1,429,099.10 3,003.99 286.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 678 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 5 of 28 81478 AUHSD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0WJ8 06/07/2013 .875000 200,000.00 200,246.00 631.94 3,270.00 05/22/2018 .750000 10,000,000.00 100.065000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/21/2018 1.190082 196,976.00 100.123000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/21/2018 1.459815 159,529.36 100.123000 SUNGARD 0.00 81538 WT GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0WJ8 07/17/2013 .875000 164,000.00 164,201.72 518.19 4,672.36 02/08/2018 .970000 164,242.02 100.230000 SUNGARD 0.00 81361 RM GOV FEDERAL NATL 3135G0JA2 04/15/2013 1.125000 3,900,000.00 3,918,291.00 18,768.76 0.00 81449 GOV FNMA CALLABLE M 3136G1M63 05/22/2013 .750000 10,000,000.00 10,006,500.00 26,875.00 6,500.00 04/27/2017 .600233 3,981,432.00 100.469000 SUNGARD -63,141.00 81889 AUHSD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0ZA4 04/01/2014 1.875000 377,000.00 387,209.16 824.69 8,810.49 81890 AUHSD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0ZA4 04/01/2014 1.875000 6,959,000.00 7,147,449.72 15,222.84 162,631.83 02/19/2019 1.795148 378,398.67 102.708000 SUNGARD 0.00 02/19/2019 1.795148 6,984,817.89 102.708000 SUNGARD 0.00 08/28/2017 1.054521 9,940,800.00 100.225000 SUNGARD 0.00 81941 GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0MZ3 04/17/2014 .875000 10,000,000.00 10,022,500.00 8,020.83 81,700.00 80020 WT GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0CM3 11/09/2011 1.250000 173,000.00 173,615.88 18.02 0.00 81230 WT GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0TG8 02/21/2013 .875000 165,000.00 165,379.50 212.55 1,137.48 09/28/2016 1.160000 173,736.98 100.356000 SUNGARD -121.10 09/28/2016 .615791 4,821,797.78 100.356000 SUNGARD -102,055.10 80833 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0CM3 09/14/2012 1.250000 4,703,000.00 4,719,742.68 489.90 0.00 Inv Type: 23 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSO 12/11/2020 1.513574 248,816.74 99.886000 SUNGARD 0.00 82930 KFPD GOV FHLB NOTES 313381C94 01/27/2016 1.250000 250,000.00 250,445.00 937.50 1,162.50 12/13/2019 1.326075 249,664.44 100.178000 SUNGARD 0.00 82928 KFPD GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A6UJ4 01/26/2016 1.250000 250,000.00 251,045.00 1,024.31 0.00 11/30/2018 1.100200 251,505.07 100.418000 BOOK 0.00 82929 KFPD GOV FHLB NOTES 313381CA1 01/27/2016 1.375000 250,000.00 249,715.00 1,050.35 1,337.50 82931 KFPD GOV FHLB NOTES 3130A3UQ5 01/25/2016 1.875000 250,000.00 256,502.50 1,432.30 2,937.50 82994 CCCCD GOV FHLB NOTE 3130A6SW8 03/22/2016 1.000000 6,000,000.00 6,023,040.00 17,000.00 12,240.00 12/19/2017 .895450 6,026,300.00 100.384000 SUNGARD 0.00 03/19/2018 .890099 2,249,302.50 100.170000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/11/2020 1.570027 254,137.92 102.601000 SUNGARD 0.00 82949 CCCSIG GOV FHLB 3130A7CX1 02/18/2016 .875000 2,250,000.00 2,253,825.00 656.25 4,522.50 .901655 239,210,457.53 100.426000 -581,071.70 Subtotal 1.035377 238,495,000.00 239,510,988.05 660,013.96 906,386.95 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 679 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 6 of 28 82709 CCCCD GOV FNMA 31398ADM1 09/29/2015 5.375000 1,550,000.00 1,636,862.00 25,225.17 0.00 09/27/2017 .723255 1,689,189.60 100.377000 SUNGARD -2,856.00 06/12/2017 .642309 1,674,015.50 105.604000 SUNGARD -37,153.50 01/28/2019 1.309114 6,673,053.60 101.303000 SUNGARD 0.00 82909 CCCCD GOV FNMA BENC 3135G0H63 01/13/2016 1.375000 6,660,000.00 6,746,779.80 16,025.62 73,726.20 10/19/2018 1.177919 129,789.40 100.697000 SUNGARD 0.00 82707 CCCCD GOV FNMA 3135G0RT2 09/29/2015 .875000 1,700,000.00 1,702,686.00 4,173.27 0.00 82708 CCCCD GOV FNMA 3135G0ZL0 09/29/2015 1.000000 1,680,000.00 1,686,333.60 186.67 0.00 12/20/2017 .793128 1,703,060.00 100.158000 SUNGARD -374.00 82951 CCCSIG GOV FNMA BEN 3135G0J53 02/23/2016 1.000000 2,000,000.00 2,004,420.00 1,944.45 9,140.00 82967 CCCSIG GOV FNMA NOT 3135G0G72 03/04/2016 1.125000 1,100,000.00 1,106,897.00 3,678.13 5,632.00 82952 CCCCD GOV FNMA BENC 3135G0J53 02/23/2016 1.000000 125,000.00 125,276.25 121.53 571.25 02/26/2019 1.079949 1,995,280.00 100.221000 SUNGARD 0.00 02/26/2019 1.079949 124,705.00 100.221000 SUNGARD 0.00 03/28/2018 .973722 2,579,830.00 99.800000 BOOK 0.00 82966 CCCSIG GOV FNMA BEN 3135G0J61 03/04/2016 .875000 2,585,000.00 2,579,830.00 188.49 0.00 05/25/2018 1.250000 10,000,000.00 100.113000 SUNGARD 0.00 09/12/2019 1.889799 164,897.76 102.481000 SUNGARD 0.00 82119 WT GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0ZG1 09/12/2014 1.750000 166,000.00 170,118.46 153.32 5,220.70 82156 CCCCD GOV FNMA 3135G0YT4 10/23/2014 1.625000 125,000.00 127,478.75 699.66 1,291.25 82236 CCCCD GOV FNMA BENC 3135G0ZY2 12/03/2014 1.750000 100,000.00 102,323.00 607.64 1,670.00 11/27/2018 1.385424 126,187.50 101.983000 SUNGARD 0.00 81999 MDUSD GOV FNMA NOTE 3135G0ZB2 05/21/2014 .750000 49,000.00 49,018.13 164.35 4.41 82678 CCCCD GOV FNMA BENC 3135G0E58 09/01/2015 1.125000 130,000.00 130,906.10 658.13 1,116.70 04/20/2017 .740235 49,013.72 100.037000 SUNGARD 0.00 11/27/2018 1.489435 115,672.75 101.983000 SUNGARD 0.00 82005 CCCCD GOV FNMA 3135G0YT4 06/05/2014 1.625000 115,000.00 117,280.45 643.68 1,607.70 02/27/2019 1.329281 6,087,180.00 101.989000 SUNGARD 0.00 82381 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3136FTS67 02/09/2015 1.700000 6,000,000.00 6,119,340.00 9,633.33 32,160.00 82436 WT GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0A78 03/16/2015 1.625000 170,000.00 172,917.20 537.15 2,939.30 82570 GOV FNMA NOTES CALL 3136G2K71 05/27/2015 1.250000 10,000,000.00 10,011,300.00 43,749.96 11,300.00 01/21/2020 1.627650 169,977.90 101.716000 SUNGARD 0.00 82257 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0YT4 12/12/2014 1.625000 6,010,000.00 6,129,178.30 33,639.32 62,684.30 11/26/2019 1.612998 100,653.00 102.323000 SUNGARD 0.00 11/27/2018 1.380107 6,066,494.00 101.983000 SUNGARD 0.00 07/05/2016 .397750 2,634,818.23 99.974000 SUNGARD -503.33 82314 CCCCD GOV FNMA 3135G0XP3 01/21/2015 .375000 2,635,000.00 2,634,314.90 2,360.52 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 680 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 7 of 28 81958 GOV FEDERAL FARM CR 3133EDKJ0 05/01/2014 .700000 5,000,000.00 5,001,650.00 14,583.33 1,650.00 12/07/2016 .972048 2,497,134.30 100.156000 SUNGARD 0.00 11/01/2016 .700000 5,000,000.00 100.033000 SUNGARD 0.00 10/10/2017 1.156802 9,998,000.00 100.556000 SUNGARD 0.00 82137 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EDXA5 10/10/2014 1.150000 10,000,000.00 10,055,600.00 54,625.00 57,600.00 07/12/2016 .600206 2,498,863.30 100.098000 SUNGARD -2,419.18 80718 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EAXG8 07/23/2012 .650000 2,494,000.00 2,496,444.12 3,557.41 0.00 81479 AUHSD GOV FFCB NOTE 3133ECPT5 06/07/2013 .650000 200,000.00 199,910.00 483.89 996.00 81579 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133ECWV2 08/20/2013 .875000 2,505,000.00 2,508,907.80 6,940.93 11,773.50 05/17/2017 .790074 198,914.00 99.955000 SUNGARD 0.00 01/16/2019 1.620035 1,990,300.00 101.092000 SUNGARD 0.00 82185 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EDYB2 11/04/2014 1.500000 2,000,000.00 2,021,840.00 6,250.00 31,540.00 82195 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EEBU3 11/18/2014 .600000 10,000,000.00 9,989,300.00 22,833.33 0.00 11/14/2016 .600000 10,000,000.00 99.893000 SUNGARD -10,700.00 Inv Type: 27 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 04/01/2018 1.201381 388,848.61 100.999639 BOOK 0.00 82778 CCCCD ABS FNMA SRS 3136AQDQ0 10/30/2015 1.646000 115,000.00 116,151.60 157.74 0.00 02/25/2018 1.293773 444,396.70 100.999250 BOOK 0.00 82545 CCCSIG GOV FNMA-ACE 3136ANJY4 04/30/2015 1.550000 385,000.00 388,848.61 497.33 0.00 09/25/2019 1.382287 116,151.60 101.001391 BOOK 0.00 82344 CCCSIG GOV FNMA ACE 3136AMKW8 01/30/2015 1.626000 440,000.00 444,396.70 596.20 0.00 01/25/2019 1.572772 65,649.99 100.999985 BOOK 0.00 82814 CCCCD GOV FNMA SRS 3136AQSW1 11/30/2015 1.898080 65,000.00 65,649.99 102.82 0.00 1.286552 1,015,046.90 100.999692 0.00 Subtotal 1.616771 1,005,000.00 1,015,046.90 1,354.09 0.00 Inv Type: 26 AGENCY ABS FXD-M 30/360 02/26/2019 1.067074 9,987,922.22 100.221000 SUNGARD 0.00 82997 GOV FNMA NOTES 3135G0J53 03/22/2016 1.000000 10,000,000.00 10,022,100.00 9,722.22 41,400.00 12/14/2018 1.082725 1,104,015.00 100.627000 SUNGARD 0.00 83000 RM GOV FNMA NOTES 3136G1C98 03/28/2016 1.420000 4,000,000.00 4,037,760.00 8,835.55 17,760.00 02/05/2020 1.286438 4,028,362.22 100.944000 SUNGARD 0.00 1.094691 94,005,848.10 100.830925 -206,204.03 Subtotal 1.264545 93,541,000.00 94,318,255.60 234,530.88 536,945.97 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 681 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 8 of 28 82846 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFSJ7 12/18/2015 1.300000 20,000,000.00 20,203,800.00 77,277.78 271,000.00 12/03/2018 1.305115 9,998,500.00 99.985000 BOOK 0.00 12/14/2018 1.415191 19,935,688.89 101.019000 SUNGARD 0.00 06/14/2018 1.255129 9,980,500.00 100.369000 SUNGARD 0.00 82847 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFSH1 12/18/2015 1.170000 10,000,000.00 10,036,900.00 34,775.00 57,700.00 82818 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFRQ2 12/03/2015 1.300000 10,000,000.00 9,998,500.00 42,611.11 0.00 82796 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFPH4 11/17/2015 .930000 10,000,000.00 10,028,000.00 34,616.67 28,000.00 11/17/2017 .930000 10,000,000.00 100.280000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/03/2018 1.300000 10,000,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82817 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFRQ2 12/03/2015 1.300000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 42,611.11 0.00 01/22/2019 1.126024 250,950.90 100.883000 SUNGARD 0.00 82926 KFPD GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFVQ7 01/27/2016 1.250000 250,000.00 252,207.50 598.96 1,300.00 82946 WT GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EC6Z2 02/12/2016 1.400000 155,000.00 155,279.00 644.97 0.00 82963 GOV FFCB CALLABLE N 3133EFYS0 03/02/2016 1.150000 10,000,000.00 10,012,700.00 12,458.33 32,300.00 12/14/2020 1.320066 155,927.76 100.180000 SUNGARD -299.15 82785 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFNF0 11/06/2015 1.080000 5,000,000.00 4,996,450.00 21,750.00 0.00 01/22/2018 1.096935 9,971,900.00 100.268000 SUNGARD 0.00 82380 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EEKB5 02/09/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 10,026,800.00 19,166.67 54,900.00 82382 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EELZ1 02/09/2015 1.000000 5,000,000.00 5,011,100.00 277.76 31,100.00 82472 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EEWH9 04/02/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 10,036,200.00 49,722.22 36,200.00 03/29/2018 1.130145 4,980,000.00 100.222000 SUNGARD 0.00 82218 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EEDQ0 12/01/2014 .580000 5,000,000.00 5,004,550.00 9,666.67 5,550.00 11/06/2018 1.104126 4,996,450.00 99.929000 BOOK 0.00 12/01/2016 .590074 4,999,000.00 100.091000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/15/2016 .720000 10,000,000.00 100.032000 SUNGARD 0.00 82259 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EEFA3 12/15/2014 .720000 10,000,000.00 10,003,200.00 21,200.00 3,200.00 04/02/2018 1.000000 10,000,000.00 100.362000 SUNGARD 0.00 82691 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFCY1 09/14/2015 .780000 5,000,000.00 5,008,050.00 1,841.67 11,050.00 08/04/2020 1.730194 170,156.40 101.788000 SUNGARD 0.00 09/14/2017 .810304 4,997,000.00 100.161000 SUNGARD 0.00 09/14/2017 .860067 4,992,100.00 100.161000 SUNGARD 0.00 82692 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFCY1 09/16/2015 .780000 5,000,000.00 5,008,050.00 1,841.67 15,950.00 08/05/2019 1.350014 1,005,740.00 101.246000 SUNGARD 0.00 82671 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EE5S5 08/25/2015 1.500000 1,000,000.00 1,012,460.00 2,333.33 6,720.00 82672 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EE5S5 08/25/2015 1.500000 3,000,000.00 3,037,380.00 7,000.00 20,160.00 82683 WT GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EE5Z9 09/11/2015 1.750000 170,000.00 173,039.60 471.04 2,883.20 08/05/2019 1.350014 3,017,220.00 101.246000 SUNGARD 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 682 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 9 of 28 03/07/2018 1.279731 154,538.24 100.149000 SUNGARD 0.00 81870 WT GOV FEDERAL HOME 3137EADP1 03/12/2014 .875000 157,000.00 157,233.93 91.58 2,695.69 82009 RM GOV FHLMC 3137EADH9 06/13/2014 1.000000 2,484,000.00 2,491,402.32 6,348.00 3,314.15 82026 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADL0 07/03/2014 1.000000 10,000,000.00 10,036,400.00 555.56 58,700.00 06/29/2017 .945000 2,488,088.17 100.298000 SUNGARD 0.00 81847 RM GOV FHLMC NOTE3S 3137EADC0 02/25/2014 1.000000 3,870,000.00 3,881,842.20 2,472.50 0.00 03/08/2017 .780254 3,895,464.60 100.306000 SUNGARD -13,622.40 03/07/2018 1.250049 6,958,474.28 100.149000 SUNGARD 0.00 81869 RM GOV FEDERAL HOME 3137EADP1 03/14/2014 .875000 7,061,000.00 7,071,520.89 4,118.94 113,046.61 82076 CCCCD GOV FHLMC 3137EADJ5 08/14/2014 1.000000 75,000.00 75,270.75 131.25 274.95 09/29/2017 1.070130 9,977,700.00 100.364000 SUNGARD 0.00 07/28/2017 1.001893 74,995.80 100.361000 SUNGARD 0.00 07/28/2017 1.002272 39,997.77 100.361000 SUNGARD 0.00 82077 CCCCD GOV FHLMC 3137EADJ5 08/14/2014 1.000000 40,000.00 40,144.40 70.00 146.63 03/08/2017 1.120062 169,012.30 100.306000 SUNGARD 0.00 80411 WT GOV FHLMC NOT 3137EADC0 03/12/2012 1.000000 170,000.00 170,520.20 108.61 1,507.90 Inv Type: 29 FHLMC NOTES 04/01/2016 .240573 248,407.38 100.000000 SUNGARD 0.00 82483 RM GOV FHLMC DISC N 313396VA8 04/10/2015 .240000 249,000.00 249,000.00 592.62 0.00 01/17/2017 .537741 994,902.64 99.596000 SUNGARD 0.00 82941 RM GOV FHLMC DISCOU 313397AS0 02/09/2016 .535000 1,000,000.00 995,960.00 772.78 284.58 Subtotal .476060 1,249,000.00 1,244,960.00 1,365.40 284.58 .478368 1,243,310.02 99.676541 0.00 Inv Type: 28 FHLMC DISCOUNT NOTES 82992 GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFQ67 03/21/2016 1.160000 10,000,000.00 10,062,300.00 3,222.22 68,200.00 03/04/2020 1.430176 4,034,408.35 99.307000 BOOK 0.00 82986 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFK63 03/15/2016 1.250000 4,061,000.00 4,032,857.27 3,807.19 0.00 03/21/2019 1.180075 9,994,100.00 100.623000 SUNGARD 0.00 02/22/2019 1.217313 9,983,594.44 100.127000 SUNGARD 0.00 03/30/2020 1.490000 4,000,000.00 100.010000 SUNGARD 0.00 83007 RM GOV FFCB NOTES 3133EFV20 03/30/2016 1.490000 4,000,000.00 4,000,400.00 165.56 400.00 1.096207 179,646,448.34 100.299650 -13,418.33 Subtotal 1.057598 179,835,000.00 180,373,875.29 497,333.82 750,172.70 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 683 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 10 of 28 82837 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADX4 12/11/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 10,039,200.00 30,555.56 50,520.00 11/01/2016 .625000 5,001,909.72 100.034000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/15/2017 1.057021 9,988,680.00 100.392000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/15/2017 1.060007 9,989,261.11 100.392000 SUNGARD 0.00 82838 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADX4 12/15/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 10,039,200.00 30,555.55 51,050.00 82807 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134G3S50 11/23/2015 .625000 5,000,000.00 5,001,700.00 13,020.83 1,700.00 82635 CCCCD GOV FHLMC NOT 3137EADG1 07/22/2015 1.750000 100,000.00 102,396.00 588.19 1,389.00 05/30/2019 1.379985 3,043,140.00 102.396000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/30/2019 1.480153 101,007.00 102.396000 SUNGARD 0.00 10/02/2019 1.310124 5,991,200.00 100.431000 SUNGARD 0.00 82762 RM GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADM8 10/26/2015 1.250000 6,000,000.00 6,025,860.00 37,291.67 39,660.00 06/23/2017 1.035077 4,997,962.37 100.246000 SUNGARD 0.00 82876 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134G64W0 12/30/2015 .900000 5,007,000.00 5,019,317.22 12,267.16 22,231.08 82927 KFPD GOV FHLMC NOTE 3137EADM8 01/25/2016 1.250000 250,000.00 251,077.50 1,553.82 1,797.50 82947 CCCCD GOV FHLMC NOT 3137EADG1 02/16/2016 1.750000 100,000.00 102,396.00 588.19 98.00 10/02/2019 1.330187 250,260.90 100.431000 SUNGARD 0.00 07/28/2017 1.002272 464,974.04 100.361000 SUNGARD 0.00 82081 CCCSIG GOV FHLMC 3137EADJ5 08/14/2014 1.000000 465,000.00 466,678.65 813.75 1,704.61 82312 AUHSD GOV FHLMC NOT 3134G3ZW3 01/21/2015 1.200000 2,486,000.00 2,501,388.34 4,391.93 15,388.34 82313 AUHSD GOV FHLMC NOT 3134G3ZW3 01/21/2015 1.200000 110,000.00 110,680.90 194.33 680.90 08/08/2018 1.200000 2,486,000.00 100.619000 SUNGARD 0.00 82078 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADL0 08/11/2014 1.000000 5,000,000.00 5,018,200.00 277.78 23,300.00 82571 RM GOV FHLMC NOTES 3137EADG1 05/27/2015 1.750000 3,000,000.00 3,071,880.00 17,645.83 28,740.00 09/29/2017 1.033085 4,994,900.00 100.364000 SUNGARD 0.00 07/28/2017 1.001893 809,954.64 100.361000 SUNGARD 0.00 82080 CCCSIG GOV FHLMC 3137EADJ5 08/14/2014 1.000000 810,000.00 812,924.10 1,417.50 2,969.46 08/08/2018 1.200000 110,000.00 100.619000 SUNGARD 0.00 82447 CCCSIG GOV FHLMC 3137EADJ5 03/20/2015 1.000000 4,305,000.00 4,320,541.05 7,533.75 904.05 07/28/2017 .853802 95,323.00 100.361000 SUNGARD 0.00 07/28/2017 .853802 4,319,637.00 100.361000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/30/2017 .710296 9,991,700.00 100.036000 SUNGARD 0.00 82549 GOV FHLMC NOTES 3134G6YC1 05/01/2015 .670000 10,000,000.00 10,003,600.00 22,519.40 11,900.00 03/08/2017 .643501 19,702,249.15 100.306000 SUNGARD -87,410.85 82317 CCCCD GOV FREDDIE M 3137EADC0 01/21/2015 1.000000 19,555,000.00 19,614,838.30 12,493.47 0.00 82319 CCCCD GOV FHLMC 3137EADC0 01/21/2015 1.000000 9,485,000.00 9,514,024.10 6,059.86 0.00 82446 CCCCD GOV FHLMC 3137EADJ5 03/20/2015 1.000000 95,000.00 95,342.95 166.25 19.95 03/08/2017 .643501 9,556,422.05 100.306000 SUNGARD -42,397.95 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 684 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 11 of 28 81514 AUHSD MUNI WICOMICO 967545R89 06/27/2013 3.500000 390,000.00 427,550.12 4,550.00 0.00 12/01/2018 1.638640 427,550.12 109.628236 BOOK 0.00 81632 CCCSIG MUNI UNIV OF 91412GSX4 10/02/2013 .907000 415,000.00 415,000.00 1,421.97 0.00 01/01/2018 1.301222 696,925.06 116.154177 BOOK 0.00 81278 CCCCD MUNI UNIV OF 91412GPY5 03/14/2013 .966000 175,000.00 175,000.00 638.63 0.00 05/15/2017 .966000 175,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 81510 AUHSD MUNI WASHINGT 93974B3K6 06/27/2013 5.000000 600,000.00 696,925.06 7,500.00 0.00 10/01/2017 1.090000 110,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82956 AUHSD MUNI CITY CHI 167486YX1 01/01/2016 5.000000 70,000.00 70,229.60 875.00 0.00 01/01/2017 4.660491 70,229.60 100.328000 BOOK 0.00 82387 CCCSIG MUNI MS ST T 605581FX0 02/18/2015 1.090000 110,000.00 110,000.00 599.50 0.00 05/15/2016 .907000 415,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 81633 CCCCD MUNI UNIV OF 91412GSZ9 10/02/2013 2.054000 195,000.00 195,000.00 1,513.11 0.00 05/15/2018 2.054000 195,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 05/15/2016 .659000 1,240,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 08/01/2016 6.525847 7,453.00 74.530000 BOOK 0.00 80198 AUHSD MUNI COMPTON 204712FD0 01/03/2012 .000000 10,000.00 7,453.00 0.00 0.00 80760 CCCCD MUNI PALO ALT 697379UA1 08/14/2012 1.402000 440,000.00 440,000.00 1,028.13 0.00 81277 CCCSIG MUNI UNIV OF 91412GPX7 03/14/2013 .659000 1,240,000.00 1,240,000.00 3,087.05 0.00 08/01/2017 1.402000 440,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 1.186956 3,777,157.78 103.625728 0.00 Subtotal 2.073550 3,645,000.00 3,777,157.78 21,213.39 0.00 Inv Type: 31 MUNICIPAL BONDS 82993 CCCCD GOV FHLMC NOT 3137EADZ9 03/21/2016 1.125000 70,000.00 69,976.90 21.88 0.00 05/30/2019 1.037316 102,667.44 102.396000 SUNGARD 0.00 82965 CCCSIG GOV FHLMC NO 3137EACA5 03/04/2016 3.750000 1,275,000.00 1,379,626.50 531.25 4,985.25 03/27/2019 1.146745 1,374,641.25 108.206000 SUNGARD 0.00 04/15/2019 1.135900 69,976.90 99.967000 BOOK 0.00 83006 GOV FHLMC STEP-UP C 3134G8PD5 03/30/2016 1.350000 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 375.00 0.00 09/30/2019 1.350000 10,000,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82996 CCCCD GOV FHLMC NOT 3137EADZ9 03/22/2016 1.125000 6,000,000.00 5,998,800.00 1,875.00 0.00 04/15/2019 1.131578 5,998,987.50 99.980000 BOOK 0.00 .965055 133,199,125.23 100.386541 -143,431.20 Subtotal 1.044983 132,970,000.00 133,483,983.20 216,634.39 438,724.07 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 685 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 12 of 28 82502 CCCSIG ABS NAROT 20 65477UAC4 04/14/2015 1.050000 845,000.00 844,822.38 394.33 0.00 10/15/2019 1.059409 844,822.38 99.978980 BOOK 0.00 82636 CCCSIG ABS NISSAN A 65475WAD0 07/22/2015 1.340000 820,000.00 819,934.81 488.36 0.00 07/17/2017 .710792 340,215.44 99.999051 BOOK 0.00 82341 CCCSIG CORP HONDA A 43814KAB7 01/28/2015 .700000 199,923.47 199,913.04 62.20 0.00 06/15/2017 .704310 199,913.04 99.994783 BOOK 0.00 82409 CCCSIG AB TOYOTA AU 89236WAB4 03/04/2015 .710000 340,218.67 340,215.44 107.37 0.00 03/16/2020 1.252803 614,965.13 99.994330 BOOK 0.00 82964 CCCSIG ABS TOYOTA C 89237KAD5 03/02/2016 1.250000 615,000.00 614,965.13 619.27 0.00 03/16/2020 1.343408 819,934.81 99.992050 BOOK 0.00 82665 CCCSIG ABS HONDA 20 43814MAC1 08/19/2015 1.270000 455,000.00 454,994.40 208.67 0.00 04/18/2019 1.270662 454,994.40 99.998769 BOOK 0.00 Inv Type: 50 AUTO ABS FXD-M 30/360 82990 RM GOV FHLB DISCOUN 313384XF1 03/18/2016 .305000 1,995,000.00 1,994,324.47 236.63 220.28 05/24/2016 .305173 1,993,867.56 99.966139 SUNGARD 0.00 .305173 1,993,867.56 99.966139 0.00 Subtotal .305000 1,995,000.00 1,994,324.47 236.63 220.28 Inv Type: 43 FHLB DISCOUNT NOTES 09/01/2016 .431873 1,095,230.58 99.825750 SUNGARD 0.00 82680 DCD GOV FFCB DISCOU 313312E30 09/04/2015 .430000 1,100,000.00 1,098,083.25 2,759.17 93.50 11/18/2016 .603550 367,823.17 99.698417 SUNGARD 0.00 82813 RM GOV FFCB DISC 313312P95 12/01/2015 .600000 370,000.00 368,884.14 752.33 308.64 Subtotal .472739 1,470,000.00 1,466,967.39 3,511.50 402.14 .475034 1,463,053.75 99.793700 0.00 Inv Type: 42 FARM CREDIT DISCOUNT NOTES 08/15/2016 .401514 293,888.83 99.849000 SUNGARD 0.00 82684 RM GOV FNMA DISC 313588C29 09/11/2015 .400000 295,000.00 294,554.55 665.39 0.33 Subtotal .400000 295,000.00 294,554.55 665.39 0.33 .401514 293,888.83 99.849000 0.00 Inv Type: 41 FNMA DISCOUNT NOTES Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 686 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 13 of 28 82772 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 500,000.00 499,226.67 1,347.50 241.67 07/26/2016 .632991 248,818.75 99.845333 SUNGARD 0.00 82773 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 250,000.00 249,613.33 673.75 120.83 07/26/2016 .632991 497,637.50 99.845333 SUNGARD 0.00 82771 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 250,000.00 249,613.33 673.75 120.83 07/26/2016 .632991 497,637.50 99.845333 SUNGARD 0.00 82769 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 500,000.00 499,226.67 1,347.50 241.67 07/26/2016 .632991 497,637.50 99.845333 SUNGARD 0.00 82770 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 500,000.00 499,226.67 1,347.50 241.67 07/26/2016 .632991 248,818.75 99.845333 SUNGARD 0.00 82776 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 250,000.00 249,613.33 673.75 120.83 07/26/2016 .632991 149,291.25 99.845333 SUNGARD 0.00 82774 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 150,000.00 149,768.00 404.25 72.50 07/26/2016 .632991 248,818.75 99.845333 SUNGARD 0.00 82775 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 250,000.00 249,613.33 673.75 120.83 06/17/2016 .653172 3,930,815.09 99.908028 SUNGARD 0.00 82698 CCCCD CP JPMSCC 46640PFH1 09/22/2015 .650000 1,995,000.00 1,993,165.15 6,916.00 938.75 07/26/2016 .632991 6,568,815.00 99.845333 SUNGARD 0.00 82695 CCCCD CP JPMSCC 46640PFH1 09/22/2015 .650000 3,950,000.00 3,946,367.10 13,693.32 1,858.69 07/26/2016 .632991 497,637.50 99.845333 SUNGARD 0.00 82768 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 6,600,000.00 6,589,792.00 17,787.00 3,190.00 06/17/2016 .653172 1,985,310.40 99.908028 SUNGARD 0.00 82767 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 500,000.00 499,226.67 1,347.50 241.67 Inv Type: 71 COMMERCIAL PAPER DISCOUNT 02/22/2019 1.083588 599,179.69 99.863282 BOOK 0.00 82448 CCCSIG AB CITIBANK 17305EFN0 03/20/2015 1.020000 600,000.00 599,179.69 663.00 0.00 1.083588 599,179.69 99.863282 0.00 Subtotal 1.020000 600,000.00 599,179.69 663.00 0.00 Inv Type: 53 CREDIT ABS FXD-SA 30/360 83008 CCCSIG ABS HYUNDAI 44930UAD8 03/30/2016 1.560000 260,000.00 259,949.56 11.27 0.00 09/15/2020 1.568722 259,949.56 99.980600 BOOK 0.00 1.169942 3,534,794.76 99.990174 0.00 Subtotal 1.165369 3,535,142.14 3,534,794.76 1,891.47 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 687 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 14 of 28 82825 CP CREDIT SUISSE NY 2254EAEA7 12/07/2015 .580000 25,000,000.00 24,989,166.67 46,722.23 4,875.00 05/11/2016 .641780 19,944,533.33 99.955556 SUNGARD 0.00 05/10/2016 .581452 24,937,569.44 99.956667 SUNGARD 0.00 05/13/2016 .591522 29,922,808.33 99.953333 SUNGARD 0.00 82826 CP NORDEA BANK AB 65558FED3 12/08/2015 .590000 30,000,000.00 29,986,000.00 56,541.67 6,650.00 82824 CP STANDARD CHARTER 85324TEB8 12/07/2015 .640000 20,000,000.00 19,991,111.11 41,244.45 5,333.33 82816 CP CREDIT SUISSE NY 2254EADF7 12/02/2015 .500000 25,000,000.00 24,996,111.11 42,013.89 972.22 04/15/2016 .500939 24,953,125.00 99.984444 SUNGARD 0.00 04/27/2016 .521069 24,948,722.22 99.971111 SUNGARD 0.00 82823 CP CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533TDT0 12/07/2015 .520000 25,000,000.00 24,992,777.78 41,888.89 2,166.67 05/27/2016 .692242 29,902,825.00 99.937778 SUNGARD 0.00 05/16/2016 .651871 24,928,229.17 99.950000 SUNGARD 0.00 82831 CP CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533TEG7 12/09/2015 .650000 25,000,000.00 24,987,500.00 51,458.33 7,812.50 82832 CP TOYOTA MOTOR CRE 89233GER3 12/10/2015 .670000 25,000,000.00 24,985,000.00 52,576.39 10,125.00 82834 CP BK OF NOVA SCOTI 06417JET5 12/10/2015 .690000 30,000,000.00 29,981,333.33 64,975.00 13,533.33 05/25/2016 .672089 24,922,298.61 99.940000 SUNGARD 0.00 82794 CP ABBEY NATIONAL T 00280NDB3 11/13/2015 .500000 20,000,000.00 19,997,777.78 38,888.89 555.56 05/09/2016 .521363 1,620,751.53 99.957778 SUNGARD 0.00 04/11/2016 .501044 19,958,333.33 99.988889 SUNGARD 0.00 04/15/2016 .390639 24,959,104.17 99.984444 SUNGARD -97.22 82795 CP SOCIETE GENERALE 83369BDF0 11/16/2015 .390000 25,000,000.00 24,996,111.11 37,104.16 0.00 07/26/2016 .632991 248,818.75 99.845333 SUNGARD 0.00 04/14/2016 .460789 24,957,194.44 99.985556 SUNGARD 0.00 82777 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGS9 10/30/2015 .630000 250,000.00 249,613.33 673.75 120.83 82790 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GE93 11/10/2015 .520000 1,625,000.00 1,624,313.89 3,356.53 205.83 07/26/2016 .632991 248,818.75 99.845333 SUNGARD 0.00 82797 CP STANDARD CHARTER 85324TDF0 11/17/2015 .480000 25,000,000.00 24,996,111.11 45,333.33 777.78 04/25/2016 .491016 24,948,277.78 99.973333 SUNGARD 0.00 82810 CP CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533TDR4 11/25/2015 .490000 25,000,000.00 24,993,333.33 43,555.55 1,500.00 82811 CP ABBEY NATIONAL 00280NDF4 11/25/2015 .460000 25,000,000.00 24,996,111.11 40,888.89 583.33 82815 CP ABBEY NATIONAL 00280NDE7 12/02/2015 .460000 25,000,000.00 24,996,388.89 38,652.78 541.67 04/15/2016 .460836 24,954,638.89 99.984444 SUNGARD 0.00 82799 CP STANDARD CHARTER 85324TDF0 11/18/2015 .530000 25,000,000.00 24,996,111.11 49,687.47 1,263.89 04/15/2016 .480962 24,950,000.00 99.984444 SUNGARD 0.00 04/15/2016 .531165 24,945,159.75 99.984444 SUNGARD 0.00 04/28/2016 .591454 29,926,250.00 99.970000 SUNGARD 0.00 82809 CP STANDARD CHARTER 85324TDU7 11/30/2015 .590000 30,000,000.00 29,991,000.00 60,475.00 4,275.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 688 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 15 of 28 82897 CP UBS FINANCE DE 90262CGN1 01/07/2016 .880000 25,000,000.00 24,962,666.67 51,944.44 31,111.12 07/21/2016 .884236 24,880,222.22 99.852000 SUNGARD 0.00 07/22/2016 .884258 24,879,611.11 99.850667 SUNGARD 0.00 06/09/2016 .732227 4,735,552.08 99.917583 SUNGARD 0.00 82903 CCCCD CP UBS FINANC 90262CF93 01/11/2016 .730000 4,750,000.00 4,746,085.21 7,801.88 2,731.25 82896 CP UBS FINANCE DE 90262CGM3 01/07/2016 .880000 25,000,000.00 24,963,000.00 51,944.45 30,833.33 82874 CP NORDEA BANK AB 65558FFW0 12/30/2015 .770000 30,000,000.00 29,964,000.00 59,675.00 21,750.00 06/30/2016 .813349 29,876,475.00 99.880000 SUNGARD 0.00 06/30/2016 .773026 29,882,575.00 99.880000 SUNGARD 0.00 07/25/2016 .803607 24,887,777.78 99.846667 SUNGARD 0.00 82879 CP RABOBANK NEDERLA 21687AGR8 01/05/2016 .800000 25,000,000.00 24,961,666.67 48,333.33 25,555.56 06/09/2016 .732227 1,585,163.75 99.917583 SUNGARD 0.00 82904 CCCCD CP UBS FINANC 90262CF93 01/11/2016 .730000 1,590,000.00 1,588,689.58 2,611.58 914.25 82905 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGB6 01/13/2016 .790000 4,300,000.00 4,294,209.33 7,454.53 3,739.80 82906 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGB6 01/13/2016 .790000 1,100,000.00 1,098,518.67 1,906.97 956.70 07/11/2016 .793133 4,283,015.00 99.865333 SUNGARD 0.00 06/24/2016 .793325 24,895,215.28 99.899667 SUNGARD 0.00 82839 CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BFQ8 12/16/2015 .790000 25,000,000.00 24,974,916.67 58,701.39 21,000.00 82840 CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BFD7 12/16/2015 .790000 20,000,000.00 19,982,561.11 46,961.11 14,600.00 82844 CP TOYOTA MOTOR CRE 89233GFP6 12/17/2015 .790000 10,000,000.00 9,990,086.11 23,261.11 8,300.00 06/13/2016 .793133 19,921,000.00 99.912806 SUNGARD 0.00 82835 CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BEX4 12/11/2015 .710000 30,000,000.00 29,978,500.00 66,266.67 14,000.00 82873 CP RABOBANK NEDERLA 21687AFW8 12/30/2015 .810000 30,000,000.00 29,964,000.00 62,775.00 24,750.00 05/31/2016 .712417 29,898,233.33 99.928333 SUNGARD 0.00 05/31/2016 .662088 29,905,400.00 99.928333 SUNGARD 0.00 82836 CP BANK OF NOVA SCO 06417JEX6 12/11/2015 .660000 30,000,000.00 29,978,500.00 61,600.00 11,500.00 06/23/2016 .793290 9,958,525.00 99.900861 SUNGARD 0.00 82853 CCCSD CP TOYOTA MOT 89233GGN0 12/21/2015 .840000 5,000,000.00 4,992,533.33 11,900.00 5,600.00 07/22/2016 .743270 3,982,404.44 99.850667 SUNGARD 0.00 07/22/2016 .844216 4,975,033.33 99.850667 SUNGARD 0.00 07/22/2016 .773391 24,890,381.94 99.850667 SUNGARD 0.00 82872 CP SOCIETE GENERALE 83369BGN0 12/30/2015 .770000 25,000,000.00 24,962,666.67 49,729.17 22,555.56 06/21/2016 .823433 3,933,535.08 99.903250 SUNGARD 0.00 82849 CCCCD CP BNP PARIBA 09659BFM7 12/21/2015 .820000 3,950,000.00 3,946,178.38 9,177.17 3,466.13 82850 CCCCD CP BNP PARIBA 09659BFM7 12/21/2015 .820000 1,995,000.00 1,993,069.84 4,635.05 1,750.61 82851 CCCSD CP ABBEY NATI 00280NGN4 12/21/2015 .740000 4,000,000.00 3,994,026.67 8,386.67 3,235.56 06/21/2016 .823432 1,986,684.18 99.903250 SUNGARD 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 689 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 16 of 28 82995 CCCCD CP BTMUFJ 06538BJN4 03/22/2016 .880000 1,995,000.00 1,989,600.20 487.67 3,085.60 09/22/2016 .883976 1,986,026.93 99.729333 SUNGARD 0.00 82999 CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BHS2 03/25/2016 .750000 25,000,000.00 24,942,833.33 3,645.83 19,395.83 08/29/2016 .762592 29,898,033.33 99.766667 SUNGARD 0.00 82989 CP TOYOTA MOTOR CRE 89233GHR0 03/18/2016 .700000 25,000,000.00 24,943,222.22 6,805.56 14,194.44 08/25/2016 .702185 24,922,222.22 99.772889 SUNGARD 0.00 82991 CP CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533THV1 03/21/2016 .760000 30,000,000.00 29,930,000.00 6,966.67 25,000.00 09/28/2016 .924299 29,860,466.67 99.635000 SUNGARD 0.00 83005 CP TOYOTA MOTOR CRE 89233GJT4 03/30/2016 .750000 25,000,000.00 24,930,388.89 1,041.67 23,618.05 09/27/2016 .752839 24,905,729.17 99.721556 SUNGARD 0.00 83004 CP CREDIT SUISSE NY 2254EAJU8 03/30/2016 .920000 30,000,000.00 29,890,500.00 1,533.33 28,500.00 08/26/2016 .752414 24,919,791.67 99.771333 SUNGARD 0.00 83001 CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BJ92 03/29/2016 .790000 25,000,000.00 24,937,388.89 1,645.83 25,715.28 09/09/2016 .792853 24,910,027.78 99.749556 SUNGARD 0.00 07/21/2016 .853689 24,891,979.17 99.852000 SUNGARD 0.00 82916 CP CREDIT AGRICOLE 22533TGM2 01/20/2016 .850000 25,000,000.00 24,963,000.00 42,500.00 28,520.83 07/29/2016 .894023 24,887,513.89 99.841333 SUNGARD 0.00 82919 CP CREDIT SUISSE NY 2254EAGV9 01/29/2016 .890000 25,000,000.00 24,960,333.33 38,937.50 33,881.94 06/15/2016 .671850 1,575,647.98 99.910417 SUNGARD 0.00 82907 PW CP TOYOTA MOTOR 89233GGB6 01/13/2016 .790000 2,000,000.00 1,997,306.67 3,467.22 1,739.45 07/11/2016 .793133 1,095,655.00 99.865333 SUNGARD 0.00 82913 CCCCD CP TOYOTA MOT 89233GFF8 01/19/2016 .670000 1,580,000.00 1,578,584.58 2,146.60 790.00 07/11/2016 .793133 1,992,100.00 99.865333 SUNGARD 0.00 82948 PW CP BNP PARIBAS 09659BHF0 02/17/2016 .840000 500,000.00 498,942.22 513.33 528.89 82979 CP TOYOTA MOTOR CRE 89233GGV2 03/10/2016 .650000 30,000,000.00 29,952,400.00 11,916.67 16,858.33 09/09/2016 .853871 1,095,013.33 99.749556 SUNGARD 0.00 07/29/2016 .651659 29,923,625.00 99.841333 SUNGARD 0.00 08/11/2016 .822755 24,916,291.67 99.794667 SUNGARD 0.00 82987 CP CREDIT SUISSE NY 2254EAHB2 03/17/2016 .820000 25,000,000.00 24,948,666.67 8,541.67 23,833.33 82961 PW CP UBS FINANCE D 90262CJ99 03/01/2016 .850000 1,100,000.00 1,097,245.11 805.14 1,426.64 82954 CP RABOBANK NEDERLA 21687AGS6 02/25/2016 .700000 25,000,000.00 24,961,333.33 17,500.00 17,722.22 07/26/2016 .702075 24,926,111.11 99.845333 SUNGARD 0.00 08/15/2016 .843543 497,900.00 99.788444 SUNGARD 0.00 Subtotal .686354 1,021,430,000.00 1,020,277,944.26 1,586,442.98 581,962.58 .688715 1,018,109,635.92 99.887211 -97.22 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 690 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 17 of 28 82753 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 400,000.00 400,010.94 684.00 10.94 04/11/2016 .360000 500,000.00 100.002736 SUNGARD 0.00 04/11/2016 .360000 400,000.00 100.002736 SUNGARD 0.00 11/16/2017 1.480000 2,175,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82798 CCCSIG YCD SKANDINA 83050FBG5 11/17/2015 1.480000 2,175,000.00 2,175,000.00 12,160.67 0.00 04/11/2016 .360000 500,000.00 100.002736 SUNGARD 0.00 82751 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 3,000,000.00 3,000,082.07 5,130.00 82.07 82752 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 500,000.00 500,013.68 855.00 13.68 04/11/2016 .360000 3,000,000.00 100.002736 SUNGARD 0.00 82812 NCD BANK OF AMERICA 06052TRA0 11/25/2015 .390000 25,000,000.00 25,001,245.99 34,666.67 1,245.99 82827 NCD WELLS FARGO BAN 94988EMK1 12/08/2015 .700000 25,000,000.00 25,020,266.96 55,902.78 20,266.96 82821 YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NG34 12/04/2015 .550000 30,000,000.00 30,003,260.65 54,541.67 3,260.65 04/15/2016 .390000 25,000,000.00 100.004984 SUNGARD 0.00 04/14/2016 .550000 30,000,000.00 100.010869 SUNGARD 0.00 04/14/2016 .510000 25,000,000.00 100.009315 SUNGARD 0.00 82822 YCD NORDEA BANK FIN 65558LLN0 12/04/2015 .510000 25,000,000.00 25,002,328.70 42,145.83 2,328.70 05/26/2017 1.150000 1,950,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82576 CCCSIG YCD NORDEA B 65558LFA5 05/29/2015 1.150000 1,950,000.00 1,950,000.00 7,848.75 0.00 04/11/2016 .360000 1,000,000.00 100.002736 SUNGARD 0.00 82744 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 1,000,000.00 1,000,027.36 1,710.00 27.36 05/26/2016 .730000 1,007,000.00 100.071262 SUNGARD 0.00 82562 PW YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NYH3 05/20/2015 .730000 2,000,000.00 2,001,272.49 12,856.11 1,272.49 82750 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 500,000.00 500,013.68 855.00 13.68 82563 RM YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NYL4 05/26/2015 .730000 1,007,000.00 1,007,717.60 6,350.53 717.60 05/20/2016 .730000 2,000,000.00 100.063625 SUNGARD 0.00 82745 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 5,100,000.00 5,100,139.52 8,721.00 139.52 04/11/2016 .360000 1,000,000.00 100.002736 SUNGARD 0.00 82748 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 1,000,000.00 1,000,027.36 1,710.00 27.36 04/11/2016 .360000 1,000,000.00 100.002736 SUNGARD 0.00 82749 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 1,000,000.00 1,000,027.36 1,710.00 27.36 04/11/2016 .360000 100,000.00 100.002736 SUNGARD 0.00 82746 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 400,000.00 400,010.94 684.00 10.94 04/11/2016 .360000 5,100,000.00 100.002736 SUNGARD 0.00 82747 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TKL2 10/13/2015 .360000 100,000.00 100,002.74 171.00 2.74 04/11/2016 .360000 400,000.00 100.002736 SUNGARD 0.00 Inv Type: 72 NEGOTIABLE CERT OF DEPOSIT Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 691 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 18 of 28 82860 YCD NORDEA BANK FIN 65558LMA7 12/23/2015 .840000 25,000,000.00 25,032,052.40 58,333.33 32,052.40 07/11/2016 .800000 20,000,000.00 100.104438 SUNGARD 0.00 07/22/2016 .840000 25,000,000.00 100.128210 SUNGARD 0.00 07/27/2016 .820000 30,000,000.00 100.127375 SUNGARD 0.00 82878 YCD CREDIT AGRICOLE 22534HCH2 01/04/2016 .820000 30,000,000.00 30,038,212.35 60,133.33 38,212.35 82859 YCD ABBEY NATL TREA 00279JBF8 12/23/2015 .800000 20,000,000.00 20,020,887.61 44,444.44 20,887.61 82857 YCD SOCIETE GENERAL 83369TR66 12/23/2015 .850000 25,000,000.00 25,028,771.87 59,027.78 28,771.87 07/08/2016 .850000 25,000,000.00 100.115087 SUNGARD 0.00 07/22/2016 .830000 25,000,000.00 100.125079 SUNGARD 0.00 82858 YCD RABOBANK NEDERL 21685VKX6 12/23/2015 .830000 25,000,000.00 25,031,269.67 57,638.89 31,269.67 04/04/2016 .610000 2,100,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 04/04/2016 .610000 5,170,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 82881 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 5,170,000.00 5,170,195.08 7,533.84 195.08 82882 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 1,080,000.00 1,080,040.75 1,573.80 40.75 82883 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 2,100,000.00 2,100,079.24 3,060.17 79.24 04/04/2016 .610000 1,080,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 82841 YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NG67 12/17/2015 .830000 30,000,000.00 30,041,457.18 73,316.67 41,457.18 05/26/2016 .680000 25,000,000.00 100.063662 SUNGARD 0.00 06/28/2016 .830000 30,000,000.00 100.138191 SUNGARD 0.00 06/23/2016 .805000 25,000,000.00 100.124607 SUNGARD 0.00 82842 YCD ROYAL BANK OF C 78009NYK6 12/17/2015 .805000 25,000,000.00 25,031,151.73 59,256.94 31,151.73 06/07/2016 .700000 25,000,000.00 100.081068 SUNGARD 0.00 07/22/2016 .840000 25,000,000.00 100.128210 SUNGARD 0.00 82830 YCD CREDIT SUISSE 22549VLL5 12/09/2015 .700000 25,000,000.00 25,013,712.43 55,416.67 13,712.43 82833 YCD ROYAL BANK OF C 78009NXU5 12/10/2015 .680000 25,000,000.00 25,015,915.55 53,361.11 15,915.55 05/16/2016 .700000 25,000,000.00 100.054850 SUNGARD 0.00 82843 YCD CREDIT AGRICOLE 22534HBK6 12/17/2015 .790000 25,000,000.00 25,031,718.82 58,152.78 31,718.82 12/22/2016 .820000 500,000.00 100.116543 SUNGARD 0.00 82854 PW NCD UNION BANK O 62478TMF3 12/22/2015 .820000 500,000.00 500,582.72 1,150.28 582.72 82855 YCD STANDARD CHARTE 85325TEY7 12/23/2015 .870000 25,000,000.00 25,034,400.62 60,416.67 34,400.62 82856 YCD NORDEA BANK FIN 65558LMA7 12/23/2015 .840000 25,000,000.00 25,032,052.40 58,333.33 32,052.40 07/22/2016 .870000 25,000,000.00 100.137602 SUNGARD 0.00 82845 YCD STANDARD CHARTE 85325TEV3 12/18/2015 .820000 30,000,000.00 30,029,465.73 71,750.00 29,465.73 06/27/2016 .790000 25,000,000.00 100.126875 SUNGARD 0.00 06/30/2016 .820000 30,000,000.00 100.098219 SUNGARD 0.00 07/22/2016 .640000 5,000,000.00 100.065586 SUNGARD 0.00 82852 CCCSD NCD MUFG UNIO 62478TMC0 12/21/2015 .640000 5,000,000.00 5,003,279.29 9,066.67 3,279.29 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 692 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 19 of 28 82912 YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NH41 01/15/2016 .840000 25,000,000.00 25,031,787.06 44,916.67 31,787.06 01/13/2017 1.140000 1,600,000.00 100.268740 SUNGARD 0.00 07/21/2016 .840000 25,000,000.00 100.127148 SUNGARD 0.00 01/13/2017 1.140000 110,000.00 100.268740 SUNGARD 0.00 82915 AUHSD YCD BNP PARIB 05572NH58 01/15/2016 1.140000 110,000.00 110,295.61 268.22 295.61 82911 AUHSD YCD BNP PARIB 05572NH58 01/15/2016 1.140000 1,600,000.00 1,604,299.84 3,901.33 4,299.84 82895 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 4,550,000.00 4,550,171.69 6,630.36 171.69 04/04/2016 .610000 5,900,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 04/04/2016 .610000 4,550,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 07/14/2016 .830000 25,000,000.00 100.116281 SUNGARD 0.00 82898 NCD WELLS FARGO BAN 94988EN79 01/08/2016 .830000 25,000,000.00 25,029,070.21 48,416.67 29,070.21 07/21/2016 .830000 25,000,000.00 100.124066 SUNGARD 0.00 82918 NCD WELLS FARGO BAN 94988EPM4 01/22/2016 .830000 25,000,000.00 25,031,016.41 40,347.22 31,016.41 82920 KFPD YCD BNP PARIBA 05572NJ31 01/25/2016 1.120000 250,000.00 250,658.85 521.11 658.85 82921 KFPD YCD BNP PARIBA 05572NJ64 01/27/2016 1.120000 250,000.00 250,663.32 505.56 663.32 01/25/2017 1.120000 250,000.00 100.263541 SUNGARD 0.00 04/04/2016 .610000 3,000,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 82886 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 3,000,000.00 3,000,113.20 4,371.67 113.20 82887 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 875,000.00 875,033.02 1,275.07 33.02 82888 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 21,800,000.00 21,800,822.59 31,767.44 822.59 04/04/2016 .610000 875,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 82884 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 2,800,000.00 2,800,105.65 4,080.22 105.65 82894 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 5,900,000.00 5,900,222.63 8,597.61 222.63 04/04/2016 .610000 2,800,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 04/04/2016 .610000 3,100,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 82885 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 3,100,000.00 3,100,116.97 4,517.39 116.97 04/04/2016 .610000 21,800,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 82892 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 500,000.00 500,018.87 728.61 18.87 04/04/2016 .610000 2,000,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 04/04/2016 .610000 500,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 04/04/2016 .610000 3,700,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 82893 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 3,700,000.00 3,700,139.61 5,391.72 139.61 04/04/2016 .610000 5,600,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 82889 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 5,600,000.00 5,600,211.31 8,160.44 211.31 82890 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 440,000.00 440,016.60 641.18 16.60 82891 PW YCD ABBEY NATION 00279JBJ0 01/06/2016 .610000 2,000,000.00 2,000,075.47 2,914.44 75.47 04/04/2016 .610000 440,000.00 100.003773 SUNGARD 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 693 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 20 of 28 82974 SO NCD UNION BANK O 62478TNX3 03/04/2016 .400000 3,900,000.00 3,900,154.81 1,213.33 154.81 04/11/2016 .400000 8,000,000.00 100.003969 SUNGARD 0.00 04/11/2016 .400000 3,900,000.00 100.003969 SUNGARD 0.00 07/29/2016 .670000 10,000,000.00 100.079830 SUNGARD 0.00 82977 YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NL20 03/10/2016 .670000 10,000,000.00 10,007,982.96 4,094.44 7,982.96 82973 SO NCD UNION BANK O 62478TNX3 03/04/2016 .400000 8,000,000.00 8,000,317.55 2,488.89 317.55 82971 SO NCD UNION BANK O 62478TNX3 03/04/2016 .400000 1,200,000.00 1,200,047.63 373.33 47.63 04/11/2016 .400000 1,200,000.00 100.003969 SUNGARD 0.00 04/11/2016 .400000 4,300,000.00 100.003969 SUNGARD 0.00 82972 SO NCD UNION BANK O 62478TNX3 03/04/2016 .400000 4,300,000.00 4,300,170.69 1,337.78 170.69 03/09/2018 1.700000 1,305,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 04/11/2016 .410000 767,000.00 100.004276 SUNGARD 0.00 82980 PW YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NL38 03/11/2016 .410000 767,000.00 767,032.79 183.44 32.79 82981 PW YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NL38 03/11/2016 .410000 900,000.00 900,038.48 215.25 38.48 82982 CCCSIG YCD ROYAL BA 78009NZZ2 03/15/2016 1.700000 1,305,000.00 1,305,000.00 1,047.63 0.00 04/11/2016 .410000 900,000.00 100.004276 SUNGARD 0.00 82942 PW YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NK62 02/10/2016 1.120000 500,000.00 501,389.23 793.33 1,389.23 07/26/2016 .850000 25,000,000.00 100.136102 SUNGARD 0.00 02/10/2017 1.120000 500,000.00 100.277845 SUNGARD 0.00 08/08/2016 .840000 500,000.00 100.147645 SUNGARD 0.00 82943 PW YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NK54 02/10/2016 .840000 500,000.00 500,738.23 595.00 738.23 01/27/2017 1.120000 250,000.00 100.265328 SUNGARD 0.00 04/11/2016 .400000 1,300,000.00 100.003969 SUNGARD 0.00 82922 YCD SOCIETE GENERAL 83369TU96 01/28/2016 .830000 25,000,000.00 25,032,957.10 36,888.89 32,957.10 82923 YCD ROYAL BANK OF C 78009NZK5 01/28/2016 .850000 25,000,000.00 25,034,025.48 37,777.78 34,025.48 07/28/2016 .830000 25,000,000.00 100.131828 SUNGARD 0.00 82953 YCD SOCIETE GENERAL 83369TZ59 02/24/2016 .760000 25,000,000.00 25,027,433.45 19,527.78 27,433.45 04/29/2016 .480000 5,801,000.00 100.016904 SUNGARD 0.00 82959 YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NK88 02/29/2016 .480000 5,801,000.00 5,801,980.60 2,475.09 980.60 82969 SO NCD UNION BANK O 62478TNX3 03/04/2016 .400000 2,200,000.00 2,200,087.33 684.44 87.33 82970 SO NCD UNION BANK O 62478TNX3 03/04/2016 .400000 1,300,000.00 1,300,051.60 404.44 51.60 04/11/2016 .400000 2,200,000.00 100.003969 SUNGARD 0.00 82957 YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NK88 02/29/2016 .480000 3,001,000.00 3,001,507.29 1,280.43 507.29 07/29/2016 .760000 25,000,000.00 100.109734 SUNGARD 0.00 04/29/2016 .480000 3,001,000.00 100.016904 SUNGARD 0.00 04/29/2016 .480000 2,644,000.00 100.016904 SUNGARD 0.00 82958 YCD BNP PARIBAS 05572NK88 02/29/2016 .480000 2,644,000.00 2,644,446.94 1,128.11 446.94 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 694 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 21 of 28 02/09/2018 1.579059 244,659.45 100.931000 SUNGARD 0.00 81217 CCCCD CORP BERKSHIR 084670BH0 02/11/2013 1.550000 245,000.00 247,280.95 548.53 2,621.50 81413 CCCCD CORP APPLE IN 037833AJ9 05/03/2013 1.000000 175,000.00 175,360.50 719.44 1,006.25 81703 CORP TOYOTA MTR CRD 89233P6S0 11/15/2013 1.250000 5,000,000.00 5,008,650.00 30,555.56 64,150.00 05/03/2018 1.076001 174,354.25 100.206000 SUNGARD 0.00 80654 CCCCD CORP WALT DIS 25468PCS3 06/14/2012 1.125000 90,000.00 90,294.30 129.38 370.98 02/15/2017 1.165961 134,748.90 100.327000 SUNGARD 0.00 02/15/2017 1.203989 89,923.32 100.327000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/05/2017 1.104000 105,000.00 99.827000 SUNGARD -181.65 81054 CCCCD CORP CHEVRON 166764AA8 12/05/2012 1.104000 105,000.00 104,818.35 373.52 0.00 81789 CORP MICROSOFT CORP 594918AV6 01/10/2014 1.625000 6,406,000.00 6,527,778.06 33,253.37 159,317.22 10/05/2017 1.545080 4,944,500.00 100.173000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/06/2018 1.750063 6,368,460.84 101.901000 SUNGARD 0.00 81813 CORP INTEL STRUCTUR 458140AL4 01/27/2014 1.350000 5,211,000.00 5,253,313.32 20,713.74 73,683.54 80653 CCCCD CORP WALT DIS 25468PCS3 06/14/2012 1.125000 135,000.00 135,441.45 194.06 692.55 Inv Type: 75 CORPORATE NOTES 82760 CCCSIG MTN BMO HARR 05574BFW5 10/23/2015 1.000000 2,175,000.00 2,175,000.00 9,727.08 0.00 04/24/2017 1.000000 2,175,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 Subtotal 1.000000 2,175,000.00 2,175,000.00 9,727.08 0.00 1.000000 2,175,000.00 100.000000 0.00 Inv Type: 74 CERT OF DEPOSIT MEDIUM TERM 08/10/2016 .705000 25,000,505.49 100.102462 SUNGARD 0.00 82998 NCD UNION BANK OF C 62478TPK9 03/23/2016 .550000 15,000,000.00 15,004,592.94 2,062.50 4,592.94 82988 YCD SVENSKA HANDELS 86958DY89 03/17/2016 .710000 25,000,000.00 25,025,615.40 7,395.83 25,109.91 82983 CCCSIG YCD TORONTO 89113E5E2 03/16/2016 1.720000 2,025,000.00 2,025,000.00 1,548.00 0.00 03/14/2018 1.720000 2,025,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 07/01/2016 .550000 15,000,000.00 100.030620 SUNGARD 0.00 83003 NCD UNION BANK OF C 62478TPP8 03/29/2016 .770000 25,000,000.00 25,041,466.14 1,604.17 41,466.14 09/23/2016 .770000 25,000,000.00 100.165865 SUNGARD 0.00 83002 YCD CREDIT SUISSE N 22549VD42 03/29/2016 .910000 25,000,000.00 25,054,889.33 1,895.83 54,889.33 09/12/2016 .910000 25,000,000.00 100.219557 SUNGARD 0.00 .736041 818,800,505.49 100.091409 0.00 Subtotal .736193 818,800,000.00 819,548,458.36 1,385,638.35 747,952.87 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 695 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 22 of 28 82367 CCCCD CORP IBM CORP 459200GX3 01/23/2015 1.950000 1,960,000.00 1,968,486.80 7,325.50 0.00 07/20/2016 .787164 1,998,597.25 100.177000 SUNGARD -10,083.80 07/22/2016 .490189 2,002,630.00 100.433000 SUNGARD -34,143.20 09/15/2016 .616979 1,989,273.00 100.463000 SUNGARD -30,244.50 82368 CCCCD CORP JOHN DEE 24422ERF8 01/23/2015 1.850000 1,950,000.00 1,959,028.50 1,603.33 0.00 82366 CCCCD CORP WELLS FA 94974BFL9 01/23/2015 1.250000 1,985,000.00 1,988,513.45 4,893.58 0.00 82352 CCCCD CORP WELLS FA 94974BFL9 01/23/2015 1.250000 1,590,000.00 1,592,814.30 3,919.80 0.00 07/20/2016 .787164 1,600,891.50 100.177000 SUNGARD -8,077.20 01/30/2017 .828281 1,593,606.55 100.222000 SUNGARD -5,087.85 82353 CCCCD CORP US BANK 90331HMC4 01/23/2015 1.100000 1,585,000.00 1,588,518.70 2,954.26 0.00 01/30/2017 .828281 1,990,751.40 100.222000 SUNGARD -6,355.80 05/18/2016 .435141 1,996,925.20 100.019000 SUNGARD -6,547.10 82369 CCCCD CORP MERCK &58933YAD7 01/23/2015 .700000 1,990,000.00 1,990,378.10 5,146.36 0.00 82370 CCCCD CORP AMERICAN 0258M0DC0 01/23/2015 2.800000 1,905,000.00 1,921,211.55 1,777.99 0.00 82371 CCCCD CORP US BANK 90331HMC4 01/23/2015 1.100000 1,980,000.00 1,984,395.60 3,690.50 0.00 09/19/2016 .840060 1,966,245.75 100.851000 SUNGARD -45,034.20 82116 CCCSIG CORP WELLS F 94974BGB0 09/09/2014 1.400000 810,000.00 811,441.80 724.50 2,243.70 05/05/2017 1.067075 1,499,205.00 100.379000 SUNGARD 0.00 09/08/2017 1.433868 809,198.10 100.178000 SUNGARD 0.00 11/15/2017 1.345000 350,000.00 100.602000 SUNGARD 0.00 82197 CCCSIG CORP CHEVRON 166764AL4 11/18/2014 1.345000 350,000.00 352,107.00 1,778.39 2,107.00 12/15/2017 1.510075 5,179,629.78 100.812000 SUNGARD 0.00 09/19/2016 .840060 1,574,028.75 100.851000 SUNGARD -36,051.00 81899 CORP WELLS FARGO &94974BFG0 04/07/2014 1.500000 5,000,000.00 5,029,350.00 15,625.00 69,450.00 81991 CCCSIG CORP APPLE I 037833AM2 05/06/2014 1.050000 1,500,000.00 1,505,685.00 6,343.75 6,480.00 01/16/2018 1.720116 4,959,900.00 100.587000 SUNGARD 0.00 82258 CORP CHEVRON CORP 166764AA8 12/15/2014 1.104000 10,000,000.00 9,982,700.00 35,573.33 25,190.00 09/15/2016 .616979 1,591,418.40 100.463000 SUNGARD -24,195.60 82348 CCCCD CORP JOHN DEE 24422ERF8 01/23/2015 1.850000 1,560,000.00 1,567,222.80 1,282.67 0.00 82349 CCCCD CORP IBM CORP 459200GX3 01/23/2015 1.950000 1,565,000.00 1,571,776.45 5,849.19 0.00 82351 CCCCD CORP AMERICAN 0258M0DC0 01/23/2015 2.800000 1,525,000.00 1,537,977.75 1,423.33 0.00 07/22/2016 .490189 1,599,038.75 100.433000 SUNGARD -27,262.30 82290 CCCSIG CORP TOYOTA 89236TCA1 01/12/2015 1.450000 220,000.00 221,119.80 700.03 1,421.20 12/05/2017 1.250044 9,957,510.00 99.827000 SUNGARD 0.00 01/12/2018 1.496870 219,698.60 100.509000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/18/2016 .435141 1,595,533.20 100.019000 SUNGARD -5,231.10 82346 CCCCD CORP MERCK &58933YAD7 01/23/2015 .700000 1,590,000.00 1,590,302.10 4,111.92 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 696 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 23 of 28 82586 CCCSIG CORP CISCO S 17275RAU6 06/17/2015 1.650000 1,725,000.00 1,749,305.25 8,380.63 24,598.50 05/15/2018 1.658000 4,995,250.00 100.205000 SUNGARD 0.00 06/15/2018 1.655855 1,724,706.75 101.409000 SUNGARD 0.00 06/15/2018 1.655855 129,977.90 101.409000 SUNGARD 0.00 82587 CCCCD CORP CISCO SY 17275RAU6 06/17/2015 1.650000 130,000.00 131,831.70 631.58 1,853.80 82581 CORP JP MORGAN CHAS 46625HJL5 06/02/2015 1.625000 5,000,000.00 5,010,250.00 30,694.44 15,000.00 82574 CCCSIG CORP BK OF N 06406HDB2 05/29/2015 1.600000 1,600,000.00 1,612,048.00 9,173.33 12,192.00 05/12/2017 .934955 564,610.15 100.155000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/22/2018 1.603145 1,599,856.00 100.753000 SUNGARD 0.00 05/22/2018 1.603145 124,988.75 100.753000 SUNGARD 0.00 82575 CCCCD CORP BK OF NE 06406HDB2 05/29/2015 1.600000 125,000.00 125,941.25 716.67 952.50 09/08/2017 1.252137 1,103,465.00 100.178000 SUNGARD -1,507.00 82598 CCCSIG CORP WELLS F 94974BGB0 07/07/2015 1.400000 1,100,000.00 1,101,958.00 983.89 0.00 82620 CCCSIG CORP TOYOTA 89236TCP8 07/13/2015 1.550000 410,000.00 413,653.10 1,376.92 4,001.60 82621 CORP TOYOTA MOTOR C 89236TCP8 07/16/2015 1.550000 5,000,000.00 5,044,550.00 16,791.67 47,050.00 07/13/2018 1.579121 409,651.50 100.891000 SUNGARD 0.00 02/06/2018 1.274939 4,978,100.00 100.181000 SUNGARD 0.00 82386 CORP IBM CORP 459200HZ7 02/11/2015 1.125000 5,000,000.00 5,009,050.00 8,593.75 30,950.00 82404 CCCSIG CORP CHEVRON 166764AV2 03/03/2015 1.365000 1,065,000.00 1,068,791.40 1,171.06 3,791.40 82416 CCCSIG CORP EXXON M 30231GAL6 03/06/2015 1.305000 1,565,000.00 1,572,026.85 1,418.29 7,026.85 03/02/2018 1.365000 1,065,000.00 100.356000 SUNGARD 0.00 82375 CCCSIG CORP IBM COR 459200HZ7 02/06/2015 1.125000 1,880,000.00 1,883,402.80 3,231.25 9,136.80 82560 CCCSIG CORP APPLE I 037833BB5 05/13/2015 .900000 565,000.00 565,875.75 1,949.25 1,265.60 02/06/2018 1.228864 1,874,266.00 100.181000 SUNGARD 0.00 02/06/2018 1.228864 159,512.00 100.181000 SUNGARD 0.00 82376 CCCCD CORP IBM CORP 459200HZ7 02/06/2015 1.125000 160,000.00 160,289.60 275.00 777.60 03/06/2018 1.305000 1,565,000.00 100.449000 SUNGARD 0.00 82513 CCCCD CORP GENERAL 36962G4D3 04/15/2015 6.000000 100,000.00 115,288.00 900.00 0.00 03/13/2018 1.545883 129,825.80 100.541000 SUNGARD 0.00 08/07/2019 1.743001 117,603.00 115.288000 SUNGARD -2,315.00 05/03/2018 1.257267 9,925,100.00 100.206000 SUNGARD 0.00 82554 CORP APPLE INC 037833AJ9 05/12/2015 1.000000 10,000,000.00 10,020,600.00 41,111.11 95,500.00 03/06/2018 1.305000 125,000.00 100.449000 SUNGARD 0.00 82417 CCCCD CORP EXXON MO 30231GAL6 03/06/2015 1.305000 125,000.00 125,561.25 113.28 561.25 82418 CORP CHEVRON CORP 166764AV2 03/09/2015 1.365000 5,000,000.00 5,017,800.00 5,497.92 18,710.47 82420 CCCCD CORP AMERICAN 02665WAT8 03/13/2015 1.500000 130,000.00 130,703.30 97.50 877.50 03/02/2018 1.372881 4,999,089.53 100.356000 SUNGARD 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 697 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 24 of 28 82910 CCCCD CORP BANK OF 060505DP6 01/13/2016 5.750000 1,390,000.00 1,477,041.80 26,641.66 0.00 11/24/2017 1.893961 1,492,545.00 100.226000 SUNGARD 0.00 12/01/2017 2.061870 1,493,510.98 106.262000 SUNGARD -7,144.60 08/07/2018 1.946012 1,947,586.85 100.312000 SUNGARD 0.00 82917 CCCCD CORP HSBC USA 40428HPU0 01/21/2016 2.000000 1,945,000.00 1,951,068.40 5,835.00 3,481.55 82908 CCCCD CORP CITIGROU 172967JE2 01/13/2016 1.850000 1,490,000.00 1,493,367.40 9,724.32 4,574.30 82719 CCCCD CORP BB&T CAL 05531FAQ6 09/29/2015 2.250000 1,960,000.00 1,993,339.60 7,350.00 13,014.40 02/01/2019 1.927457 1,980,325.20 101.701000 SUNGARD 0.00 11/03/2018 1.334116 1,588,410.00 99.900000 BOOK 0.00 82779 CCCSIG CORP MICROSO 594918BF0 11/03/2015 1.300000 1,590,000.00 1,588,410.00 8,497.67 0.00 02/06/2018 1.166196 4,996,262.50 100.181000 SUNGARD 0.00 01/16/2018 1.528436 249,997.92 100.144000 SUNGARD 0.00 82924 KFPD CORP AUST & NZ 05253JAH4 01/29/2016 1.500000 250,000.00 250,360.00 781.25 497.50 82925 KFPD CORP HSBC 40428HPH9 01/25/2016 1.625000 250,000.00 249,565.00 846.35 190.00 82940 CORP IBM CORP 459200HZ7 02/08/2016 1.125000 5,000,000.00 5,009,050.00 8,593.75 13,100.00 01/16/2018 1.754255 249,476.56 99.826000 SUNGARD 0.00 82693 CORP JP MORGAN CHAS 46623EKD0 09/15/2015 1.700000 5,000,000.00 5,027,000.00 7,083.33 35,300.00 08/07/2018 1.435833 1,337,614.80 101.185000 SUNGARD 0.00 03/01/2018 1.769114 4,991,700.00 100.540000 SUNGARD 0.00 01/15/2017 .739645 1,553,193.00 100.035000 SUNGARD -2,650.50 82712 CCCCD CORP PFIZER I 717081DD2 09/29/2015 .900000 1,550,000.00 1,550,542.50 2,945.00 0.00 07/13/2018 1.567156 4,997,500.00 100.891000 SUNGARD 0.00 02/15/2019 1.739996 1,983,187.80 110.657000 SUNGARD 0.00 82634 CCCCD CORP PEPSICO 713448CW6 07/17/2015 1.125000 100,000.00 100,414.00 231.25 446.00 82658 CCCSIG CORP 3M COMP 88579YAP6 08/07/2015 1.375000 1,340,000.00 1,355,879.00 2,763.75 18,264.20 07/17/2017 1.139621 99,968.00 100.414000 SUNGARD 0.00 82713 CCCCD CORP PFIZER I 717081DL4 09/29/2015 2.100000 1,960,000.00 2,018,427.60 15,549.33 34,358.80 06/01/2019 1.599996 1,529,290.00 109.765000 SUNGARD 0.00 82716 CCCCD CORP MICROSOF 594918AC8 09/29/2015 4.200000 1,400,000.00 1,536,710.00 19,600.00 7,420.00 82717 CCCCD CORP US BANCO 91159HHH6 09/29/2015 2.200000 1,950,000.00 1,986,504.00 18,590.00 3,568.50 82718 CCCCD CORP CISCO SY 17275RAE2 09/29/2015 4.950000 1,795,000.00 1,986,293.15 11,353.38 3,105.35 04/25/2019 1.710407 1,982,935.50 101.872000 SUNGARD 0.00 82714 CCCCD CORP GOLDMAN 38147MAA3 09/29/2015 2.900000 1,510,000.00 1,545,258.50 8,758.00 0.00 05/15/2019 1.748923 1,984,068.80 102.981000 SUNGARD 0.00 07/19/2018 1.927831 1,549,879.10 102.335000 SUNGARD -4,620.60 07/19/2018 1.927831 1,980,971.30 102.335000 SUNGARD -5,905.80 82715 CCCCD CORP GOLDMAN 38147MAA3 09/29/2015 2.900000 1,930,000.00 1,975,065.50 11,194.00 0.00 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 698 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 25 of 28 82808 CCCSIG CD SVENSKA H 86958DH54 11/24/2015 .832100 1,340,000.00 1,340,000.00 1,145.99 0.00 11/17/2017 .954100 2,175,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82800 CCCSIG CD HSBC BK U 40428AR41 11/18/2015 .954100 2,175,000.00 2,175,000.00 2,536.32 0.00 08/24/2017 .832100 1,340,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 .907591 3,515,000.00 100.000000 0.00 Subtotal .907591 3,515,000.00 3,515,000.00 3,682.31 0.00 Inv Type: 80 YCD / NCD QTR FLTR 82526 CCCSIG YCD RABOBANK 21684BXH2 04/27/2015 1.070000 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 9,511.10 0.00 04/06/2017 1.010000 2,150,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 04/21/2017 1.070000 2,000,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 11/06/2017 1.560000 2,450,000.00 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82788 CCCSIG YCD BK NOVA 06417GAS7 11/09/2015 1.560000 2,450,000.00 2,450,000.00 15,075.67 0.00 82487 CCCSIG YCD CANADIAN 13606JYY9 04/10/2015 1.010000 2,150,000.00 2,150,000.00 10,555.89 0.00 82118 CCCSIG NCD US BANK 90333VPF1 09/11/2014 1.375000 2,000,000.00 1,996,780.00 1,527.78 0.00 09/11/2017 1.430018 1,996,780.00 99.839000 BOOK 0.00 Subtotal 1.265482 8,600,000.00 8,596,780.00 36,670.44 0.00 1.278261 8,596,780.00 99.962558 0.00 Inv Type: 79 YCD/NCD 30/360 82962 CCCSIG CORP JOHNSON 478160BR4 03/01/2016 1.125000 720,000.00 719,913.60 675.00 0.00 82975 CORP WELLS FARGO &949746RS2 03/07/2016 2.500000 5,000,000.00 4,989,750.00 9,375.00 0.00 03/01/2019 1.129079 719,913.60 99.988000 BOOK 0.00 02/28/2018 1.400000 940,000.00 100.842000 SUNGARD 0.00 02/19/2019 1.704120 869,895.60 100.933000 SUNGARD 0.00 82950 CCCSIG CORP TOYOTA 89236TCU7 02/19/2016 1.700000 870,000.00 878,117.10 1,725.50 8,221.50 82960 CCCSIG CORP CISCO S 17275RBA9 02/29/2016 1.400000 940,000.00 947,914.80 1,169.78 7,914.80 82985 CORP EXXON MOBIL CO 30231GAP7 03/15/2016 1.708000 3,500,000.00 3,546,165.00 4,649.56 46,165.00 03/01/2019 1.708000 3,501,992.67 101.319000 SUNGARD 0.00 03/15/2019 1.726104 329,749.20 101.388000 SUNGARD 0.00 03/04/2021 2.543964 4,990,791.67 99.795000 BOOK 0.00 82984 CCCSIG CORP BERKSHI 084664CG4 03/15/2016 1.700000 330,000.00 334,580.40 249.33 4,831.20 1.412982 141,467,496.42 100.847255 -262,638.80 Subtotal 1.640603 140,882,000.00 142,075,630.23 508,500.78 887,432.91 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 699 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 26 of 28 05/24/2017 .600000 3,335.77 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 82001 CD CCCCD BERTA KAMM 121101042 05/24/2014 .600000 3,335.77 3,335.77 37.69 0.00 .600000 3,335.77 100.000000 0.00 Subtotal .600000 3,335.77 3,335.77 37.69 0.00 Inv Type: 1000 TD WITH CALC CODE OF CSC-00 04/01/2016 .000000 28,092.20 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 81524 AUHSD MM DREYFUS TA 26202K205 06/27/2013 .000000 537,226.12 537,226.12 0.00 0.00 04/01/2016 .000000 537,226.12 100.000000 BOOK 0.00 81525 AUHSD MM DREYFUS TA 26202K205 06/27/2013 .000000 28,092.20 28,092.20 0.00 0.00 Subtotal .000000 565,318.32 565,318.32 0.00 0.00 .000000 565,318.32 100.000000 0.00 Inv Type: 99 MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS Grand Total Count 415 .857579 2,703,030,796.23 2,707,085,155.22 5,283,502.98 5,051,211.00 .825117 2,701,750,532.54 100.149993 -1,212,174.14 Inv.Description CUSIP Purchase Coupon Current Par /Share Market Value Curr Accr Int Unrealized Gain No.Maturity YTM TR Current Book Market Price Price Source Unrealized Loss AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 700 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 27 of 28 SUPRANATIONAL 15,000.00 14,981.49 15,002.15 100.14 %27.95 1.19 % MONEY MARKET ACCOUNTS 565.32 565.32 565.32 100.00 %0.00 0.00 % TIME DEPOSIT 3.34 3.34 3.34 100.00 %0.00 0.60 % MBS/ABS 5,140.14 5,149.02 5,149.02 100.00 %0.00 1.18 % CORPORATE NOTES 140,882.00 141,467.50 142,075.63 100.43 %624.79 1.41 % NCD/YCD 833,090.00 833,087.29 833,835.24 100.09 %747.95 0.74 % COMMERCIAL PAPER 1,021,430.00 1,018,109.64 1,020,277.94 100.21 %581.87 0.69 % MUNICIPALS 3,645.00 3,777.16 3,777.16 100.00 %0.00 1.19 % U.S. AGENCIES 649,850.00 651,056.00 652,687.91 100.25 %1,689.01 0.99 % U.S. TREASURIES 33,425.00 33,553.79 33,711.45 100.47 %167.46 1.03 % Totals(000's)2,703,030.80 2,701,750.53 2,707,085.16 100.20 %3,839.04 0.83 % Assets (000's)Current Par Current Book Market MKT/Book Un Gain/Loss Yield Asset Allocation AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 701 Inventory by Market Value Contra Costa County As Of Date: 03/31/2016 Run: 04/07/2016 04:11:52 PMDate Basis: Settlement Reporting Currency: Local AvantGard APS2 Page 28 of 28 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 702 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 703 SECTION III APPENDIX B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL – MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED PARTIES B.1. STATE OF CALIFORNIA LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 704 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AS OF MARCH 31, 2016 CALIFORNIA STATE LOCAL STATE CONTROLLER ACCOUNT ESTIMATED AGENCY INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS ACCOUNT NUMBER BALANCE FAIR VALUE ACALANES UNION HIGH SCHOOL 75-07-010 949,248.16 949,458.00 ANTIOCH UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-005 826,744.89 826,927.65 BRENTWOOD UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-013 8,143,652.16 8,145,452.40 BYRON UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-017 165,624.55 165,661.16 CANYON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-018 192,552.10 192,594.67 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT 70-07-001 31,500,000.00 31,506,963.39 CONTRA COSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE 75-07-001 616,144.97 616,281.18 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 99-07-000 65,000,000.00 65,014,368.90 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION 75-07-007 1,282,834.17 1,283,117.75 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SCHOOL INSURANCE GROUP 35-07-001 2,233,216.45 2,233,710.12 CROCKETT COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 16-07-004 2,493,530.96 2,494,082.18 DELTA DIABLO SANITATION DISTRICT 70-07-003 72,637.29 72,653.35 EAST CONTRA COSTA REG FEE & FINANCING AUTH 40-07-006 1,009,980.79 1,010,204.06 JOHN SWETT UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-020 0.00 0.00 KENSINGTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 17-07-011 1,279,918.14 1,280,201.08 KENSINGTON POLICE PROTECTION & COMMUNITY 16-07-003 1,212,873.80 1,213,141.92 SERVICES DISTRICT LAFAYETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-012 4,998,858.87 4,999,963.92 MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-011 3,823,110.55 3,823,955.69 MORAGA ORINDA FIRE DISTRICT 17-07-003 15,078.23 15,081.56 MT DIABLO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-008 5,218,057.21 5,219,210.71 MT VIEW SANITARY DISTRICT 70-07-008 8,958,370.68 8,960,351.02 OAKLEY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-009 247,381.23 247,435.92 ORINDA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-015 7,412,000.35 7,413,638.85 PITTSBURG UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-002 32,487,918.44 32,495,100.22 RECLAMATION DISTRICT 800 60-07-003 5,312,252.74 5,313,427.07 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 65-07-015 6,989.11 6,990.66 RODEO -HERCULES FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 17-07-001 105,910.98 105,934.39 SAN RAMON VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-004 239,701.57 239,754.56 WALNUT CREEK SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-003 0.00 0.00 WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 75-07-014 8,436,000.00 8,437,864.86 TOTAL 194,240,588.39 194,283,527.21 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 705 SECTION III APPENDIX B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL – MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED PARTIES B.2. ASSET MANAGEMENT FUNDS a. WELLS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT b. CalTRUST AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 706 Wells Capital Management GAAPWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Quarter End (Q1 Y2016)01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Dated: 04/05/2016Locked DownAUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES707 Risk Summary (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))1Performance Summary Gross of Fees (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))4Performance Summary Net of Fees (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))6GAAP Financials (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))8Income Detail (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))9Balance Sheet Classification (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))12Trading Activity (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))16Transaction Detail (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))22MMF Transaction Detail (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))27Roll Forward (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))29Shock Analysis (WC-Contra Costa County (19529))33Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/2016AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES708 Asset ClassIssuer ConcentrationIssuer Concentration% of Base MarketValue + AccruedWells Fargo Funds Trust3.772%International Bank for Reconstruction & Development7.539%Inter-American Development Bank3.606%Government of the United States16.050%Federal National Mortgage Association Fannie Mae2.268%Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp5.056%Federal Home Loan Banks Office of Finance12.400%Other49.309%---100.000%Security TypeMarket SectorCash and Fixed Income SummaryRisk MetricValueCash1,202.50MMFund1,678,975.85Fixed Income42,832,800.33Duration0.521Convexity0.005WAL0.731Years to Final Maturity0.904Years to Effective Maturity0.722Yield0.726Book Yield0.744Avg Credit RatingAA+/Aa1/AA+Balance SheetBook Value + Accrued44,495,161.05Net Unrealized Gain/Loss17,817.64Market Value + Accrued44,512,978.68Risk SummaryWC-Contra Costa County (19529)01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/20161AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES709 Credit Duration Heat MapRating0 - 1 1 - 2 2 - 3 3 - 4 4 - 5 5 - 7 7 - 10 10 - 15 15 - 30AAA 55.099% 11.580% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000%AA13.177% 3.477% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000%A16.668% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000%BBB0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000%BB0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000%B0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000%CCC0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000%CC0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000%C0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000%NA0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000% 0.000%Time To MaturityCredit RatingDurationRisk SummaryWC-Contra Costa County (19529)01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/20162AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES710 MMF Asset AllocationCountryCurrencyBase Exposure - Industry SectorBase Exposure - Industry GroupBase Exposure - Industry SubgroupRisk SummaryWC-Contra Costa County (19529)01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/20163AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES711 Gross of Fees (includes trading). Returns are actual and have not been annualized. No Tax Adjustment. Note that data will not exist prior to the performance inception date of: 04/01/2001. Historical data exists for the options shown below:PeriodPeriod BeginPeriod EndTotal ReturnIndex Total ReturnExcess Total ReturnMonth to Date03/01/201603/31/20160.132%0.092%0.040%Quarter to Date01/01/201603/31/20160.324%0.215%0.109%Year to Date01/01/201603/31/20160.324%0.215%0.109%Prior Month02/01/201602/29/20160.061%0.036%0.025%Prior Quarter10/01/201512/31/20150.021%0.003%0.018%Prior Year01/01/201512/31/20150.427%0.221%0.206%Trailing Month03/01/201603/31/20160.132%0.092%0.040%Trailing Quarter01/01/201603/31/20160.324%0.215%0.109%Trailing Year04/01/201503/31/20160.579%0.389%0.189%AccountIndexIndex Start DateIndex End DateWC-Contra Costa CountyML 6 Month T-Bill01/31/198011/30/2004WC-Contra Costa CountyBofA Merrill Lynch 6 Month Treasury Bill Index (G0O2)12/01/2004---Performance Summary Gross of FeesWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/20164AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES712 Reported Index Return is always Total Return.Begin DateEnd DateReturn TypeFee OptionsTax Options04/01/200101/31/2011Total ReturnNet of Fees, Gross of FeesGross Down Method, Gross Up Method, No Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Income ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Price ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Book ReturnNet of Fees, Gross of FeesGross Down Method, Gross Up Method, No Tax AdjustmentPerformance Summary Gross of FeesWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/20165AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES713 Net of Fees (includes management and trading). Returns are actual and have not been annualized. No Tax Adjustment. Note that data will not exist prior to the performance inception date of: 04/01/2001. Historical data exists for the options shown below:PeriodPeriod BeginPeriod EndTotal ReturnIndex Total ReturnExcess Total ReturnMonth to Date03/01/201603/31/20160.123%0.092%0.030%Quarter to Date01/01/201603/31/20160.296%0.215%0.080%Year to Date01/01/201603/31/20160.296%0.215%0.080%Prior Month02/01/201602/29/20160.051%0.036%0.015%Prior Quarter10/01/201512/31/2015-0.007%0.003%-0.010%Prior Year01/01/201512/31/20150.313%0.221%0.092%Trailing Month03/01/201603/31/20160.123%0.092%0.030%Trailing Quarter01/01/201603/31/20160.296%0.215%0.080%Trailing Year04/01/201503/31/20160.465%0.389%0.075%AccountIndexIndex Start DateIndex End DateWC-Contra Costa CountyML 6 Month T-Bill01/31/198011/30/2004WC-Contra Costa CountyBofA Merrill Lynch 6 Month Treasury Bill Index (G0O2)12/01/2004---Performance Summary Net of FeesWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/20166AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES714 Reported Index Return is always Total Return.Begin DateEnd DateReturn TypeFee OptionsTax Options04/01/200101/31/2011Total ReturnNet of Fees, Gross of FeesGross Down Method, Gross Up Method, No Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Income ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Price ReturnGross of FeesNo Tax Adjustment04/01/200101/31/2011Book ReturnNet of Fees, Gross of FeesGross Down Method, Gross Up Method, No Tax AdjustmentPerformance Summary Net of FeesWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/20167AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES715 Balance SheetWC-Contra Costa CountyAs of:12/31/201503/31/2016Book Value44,321,585.8344,393,589.63Accrued Balance112,601.55101,571.42Book Value + Accrued44,434,187.3844,495,161.05Net Unrealized Gain/Loss-52,374.6717,817.64Market Value + Accrued44,381,812.7144,512,978.68Income StatementWC-Contra Costa CountyBegin DateEnd Date01/01/201603/31/2016Net Amortization/Accretion Income-38,408.28Interest Income111,988.26Dividend Income0.00Misc Income0.00Income Subtotal111,988.26Net Realized Gain/Loss0.00Impairment Loss0.00Net Gain/Loss0.00Expense-12,606.32Net Income60,973.67Transfers In/Out0.00Change in Unrealized Gain/Loss70,192.30Statement of Cash FlowsWC-Contra Costa CountyBegin DateEnd Date01/01/201603/31/2016Net Income60,973.67Amortization/Accretion on MS38,700.78Change in Accrued on MS62,973.88Net Gain/Loss on MS-0.00Change in Unrealized G/L on CE27.84Subtotal101,702.49Purchases of MS-14,011,474.47Purchased Accrued of MS-62,010.42Sales of MS1,471,951.70Sold Accrued of MS10,066.67Maturities of MS13,209,000.00Net Purchases/Sales617,533.48Transfers of Cash & CE0.00Total Change in Cash & CE780,209.64Beginning Cash & CE1,399,644.05Ending Cash & CE2,179,853.69GAAP FinancialsWC-Contra Costa County (19529)01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/20168AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES716 IdentifierBase Current Units DescriptionCoupon Final Maturity EffectiveMaturityTransfers In/Out Net RealizedGain/LossNet Amortization/Accretion IncomeInterest/DividendIncomeBaseExpenseBase Net Income Settle Date02665WAY7500,000.00 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP1.073 09/20/2017 09/20/20170.000.000.001,297.52 0.001,297.52 09/24/201502665WAY7250,000.00 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP1.073 09/20/2017 09/20/20170.000.00-7.46570.88 0.00563.42 01/12/201603255LGX1750,000.00 ANAHEIM CALIF PUB FING AUTH LEASEREV1.00 05/01/2016 05/01/20160.000.000.001,875.00 0.001,875.00 11/14/201406050TLU4500,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA NA1.088 02/14/2017 02/14/20170.000.000.00691.67 0.00691.67 02/14/201406050TLU40.00 BANK OF AMERICA NA1.088 02/14/2017 02/14/20170.000.000.00519.75 0.00519.75 02/14/201406050TMB5250,000.00 BANK OF AMERICA NA1.086 06/05/2017 06/05/20170.000.000.00601.88 0.00601.88 06/05/201506406HBX6750,000.00 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP2.30 07/28/2016 07/28/20160.000.00-3,079.874,312.50 0.001,232.63 01/21/201505531FAG80.00 BB&T CORP3.20 03/15/2016 03/15/20160.000.00-2,375.703,000.00 0.00624.31 04/06/2015084664CD1750,000.00 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCE CORP 0.921 01/12/2018 01/12/20180.000.000.001,677.38 0.001,677.38 01/15/201509247XAC5500,000.00 BLACKROCK INC6.25 09/15/2017 09/15/20170.000.00-3,046.663,906.25 0.00859.59 02/16/201605581RAC0600,000.00 BMWLT-161-A2B0.932 01/22/2018 05/02/20170.000.000.00681.98 0.00681.98 02/17/2016097023BC8750,000.00 BOEING CO3.75 11/20/2016 11/20/20160.000.00-5,363.387,031.25 0.001,667.87 01/26/201507330NAH8700,000.00 BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO1.00 04/03/2017 04/03/20170.000.00216.74738.89 0.00955.63 02/23/2016CCYUSD-1.97 Cash0.00 03/31/2016 03/31/20160.000.000.000.00 -12,606.32-12,606.32 ---14912L4X6775,000.00 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESCORP2.05 08/01/2016 08/01/20160.000.00-2,697.913,971.88 0.001,273.96 11/04/201417305EFE0750,000.00 CCCIT-13A6-A61.32 09/07/2018 09/07/20160.000.00-588.162,117.50 0.001,529.34 01/14/2016161571GJ7775,000.00 CHAIT 2014-A1 A11.15 01/15/2019 01/14/20170.000.00-249.972,228.13 0.001,978.16 08/07/2015166764AL4700,000.00 CHEVRON CORP1.345 11/15/2017 11/15/20170.000.00191.591,621.47 0.001,813.06 01/29/201617275RAY8750,000.00 CISCO SYSTEMS INC0.944 06/15/2018 06/15/20180.000.000.001,601.53 0.001,601.53 06/17/2015191216BR0300,000.00 COCA-COLA CO0.875 10/27/2017 10/27/20170.000.0016.43656.25 0.00672.68 10/27/201530231GAS1560,000.00 EXXON MOBIL CORP1.232 02/28/2018 02/28/20180.000.000.00555.59 0.00555.59 03/03/20163133EFBT31,000,000.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP0.42 09/01/2016 09/01/20160.000.0049.731,050.00 0.001,099.73 09/01/20153133EDQW50.00 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP0.29 01/21/2016 01/21/20160.000.0049.07161.11 0.00210.18 08/01/20143130A4KE1500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.33 04/01/2016 04/01/20160.000.0019.10412.50 0.00431.60 04/01/20153130A3J701,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.625 11/23/2016 11/23/20160.000.00-349.241,562.50 0.001,213.26 05/18/20153130A2T971,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.50 09/28/2016 09/28/20160.000.00-281.601,250.00 0.00968.40 10/15/20153130A2T97500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.50 09/28/2016 09/28/20160.000.00-103.75625.00 0.00521.25 09/30/2015313384SS90.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00 02/05/2016 02/05/20160.000.00243.060.00 0.00243.06 02/06/2015313384ZK8500,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00 07/15/2016 07/15/20160.000.00770.970.00 0.00770.97 12/23/20153130A3XU30.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.25 01/22/2016 01/22/20160.000.007.58145.84 0.00153.42 01/27/2015313379FW41,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1.00 06/09/2017 06/09/20170.000.00-7.030.00 0.00-7.03 03/31/2016313373SZ61,000,000.00 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS2.125 06/10/2016 06/10/20160.000.00-4,018.145,312.50 0.001,294.36 07/16/20143136FPET00.00 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATION2.00 03/10/2016 03/10/20160.000.00-3,146.403,833.33 0.00686.93 03/26/20153135G0JA21,000,000.00 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATION1.125 04/27/2017 04/27/20170.000.00-150.07531.25 0.00381.18 03/14/20163137EADF31,000,000.00 FREDDIE MAC1.25 05/12/2017 05/12/20170.000.00-341.33972.22 0.00630.89 03/03/20163137EACW7235,000.00 FREDDIE MAC2.00 08/25/2016 08/25/20160.000.00-681.961,175.00 0.00493.04 12/15/20153137EADT31,000,000.00 FREDDIE MAC0.875 02/22/2017 02/22/20170.000.00-47.84243.06 0.00195.22 03/21/201631679KAB60.00 FTAT-142-A2A0.45 04/17/2017 02/16/20160.00-0.000.7129.32 0.0030.03 06/11/201431680GAB2500,000.00 FTAT-151-A2A1.02 05/15/2018 10/18/20160.000.002.351,275.00 0.001,277.35 11/05/201536962G6Q20.00 GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORP0.918 01/08/2016 01/08/20160.000.00-32.11133.88 0.00101.76 09/23/201341284AAB429,979.48 HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018 05/06/20160.000.000.6058.03 0.0058.64 04/16/201441284BAB2247,941.38 HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019 09/11/20160.00-0.000.52565.06 0.00565.58 01/28/20154197915E4750,000.00 HAWAII ST0.731 08/01/2016 08/01/20160.000.000.001,370.63 0.001,370.63 11/25/2014437076BJ0750,000.00 HOME DEPOT INC1.004 09/15/2017 09/15/20170.000.000.001,715.29 0.001,715.29 09/15/201543814KAB7159,462.77 HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017 06/12/20160.000.013.30358.82 0.00362.13 01/28/20154581X0BV90.00 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 1.125 03/15/2017 03/15/20170.000.00-88.64343.75 0.00255.11 03/04/2016Income DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/20169AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES717 IdentifierBase Current Units DescriptionCoupon Final Maturity EffectiveMaturityTransfers In/Out Net RealizedGain/LossNet Amortization/Accretion IncomeInterest/DividendIncomeBaseExpenseBase Net Income Settle Date4581X0BV90.00 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 1.125 03/15/2017 03/15/20170.000.00-183.08637.50 0.00454.42 02/11/20164581X0BV91,000,000.00 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 1.125 03/15/2017 03/15/20170.000.00-136.99500.00 0.00363.01 03/04/20164581X0BV9600,000.00 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK 1.125 03/15/2017 03/15/20170.000.00-94.31300.00 0.00205.69 02/11/2016459058DM2750,000.00 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP0.50 05/16/2016 05/16/20160.000.0012.48583.33 0.00595.81 02/05/2016459058DM21,000,000.00 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP0.50 05/16/2016 05/16/20160.000.0016.551,250.00 0.001,266.55 12/03/2015459056HY60.00 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP0.00 02/15/2016 02/15/20160.000.00424.450.00 0.00424.45 04/30/2015459056HY60.00 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP0.00 02/15/2016 02/15/20160.000.00101.230.00 0.00101.23 05/20/201545905UQG2600,000.00 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP0.625 09/26/2016 09/26/20160.000.0076.99729.16 0.00806.15 01/21/201645905U7F51,000,000.00 INTERNATIONAL BK FOR RECON & DEVMEDIUM TERM BK N0.45 07/19/2016 07/19/20160.000.000.001,127.50 0.001,127.50 06/26/201547787WAB5400,000.00 JDOT-15B-A20.98 06/15/2018 11/16/20160.000.002.09980.01 0.00982.10 09/09/201546623EJY6500,000.00 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO1.35 02/15/2017 02/15/20170.000.00-57.56843.75 0.00786.19 01/25/201646623EJY60.00 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO1.35 02/15/2017 02/15/20170.000.00-28.14393.75 0.00365.61 01/25/201646625HHW30.00 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO2.60 01/15/2016 01/15/20160.000.00-497.21758.33 0.00261.12 01/21/2015544587B72490,000.00 LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORPLEASE REV1.26 11/01/2016 11/01/20160.000.000.001,543.50 0.001,543.50 11/19/20155446462Q40.00 LOS ANGELES CALIF UNI SCH DIST0.486 01/01/2016 01/01/20160.000.000.000.00 0.000.00 08/19/201458772PAB4601,419.56 MBART-151-A2A0.82 06/15/2018 09/30/20160.000.00222.541,314.81 0.001,537.35 12/08/2015605581FW2300,000.00 MISSISSIPPI ST0.64 10/01/2016 10/01/20160.000.000.00480.00 0.00480.00 02/18/201565477WAB2193,439.89 NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017 05/10/20160.00-0.005.75438.56 0.00444.31 12/10/2014637432HT5500,000.00 NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPFINANCE CORP5.45 04/10/2017 04/10/20170.000.00-3,146.494,011.81 0.00865.32 02/08/201668428LDH40.00 ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG0.68 02/01/2016 02/01/20160.000.000.00170.00 0.00170.00 02/27/201568428LDH40.00 ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG0.68 02/01/2016 02/01/20160.000.000.00277.67 0.00277.67 01/13/201568428LDM3250,000.00 ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG 0.938 11/01/2016 11/01/20160.000.000.00508.08 0.00508.08 01/13/201669353RCG1750,000.00 PNC BANK NA1.125 01/27/2017 12/28/20160.000.000.001,382.81 0.001,382.81 02/02/201669349LAH10.00 PNC BANK,NA0.80 01/28/2016 01/28/20160.000.000.00450.00 0.00450.00 04/30/2015CCYUSD1,204.47 Receivable0.00 03/31/2016 03/31/20160.000.000.000.00 0.000.00 ---762494QV7250,000.00 RIALTO CALIF UNI SCH DIST1.258 02/01/2017 02/01/20170.000.000.00515.43 0.00515.43 03/26/2015762494QV70.00 RIALTO CALIF UNI SCH DIST1.258 02/01/2017 02/01/20170.000.000.00270.82 0.00270.82 03/26/201576912TJC8125,000.00 RIVERSIDE CNTY CALIF PUB FING AUTHTAX ALLOC REV1.00 09/01/2016 09/01/20160.000.0092.08312.50 0.00404.58 03/26/2015857477AH60.00 STATE STREET CORP2.875 03/07/2016 03/07/20160.000.00-1,158.161,502.19 0.00344.03 03/23/2015857477AH60.00 STATE STREET CORP2.875 03/07/2016 03/07/20160.000.00-1,259.171,581.25 0.00322.08 03/03/201589236WAB4324,017.78 TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017 06/19/20160.000.001.10721.78 0.00722.88 03/04/2015880591EA6586,000.00 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY5.50 07/18/2017 07/18/20170.000.00-220.71179.06 0.00-41.65 03/29/201689116EC190.00 Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.0.00 03/01/2016 03/01/20160.000.00475.000.00 0.00475.00 12/01/201589233AHP70.00 Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.601 02/19/2016 02/19/20160.000.000.00410.52 0.00410.52 08/28/201589233GEJ1500,000.00 Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.00 05/18/2016 05/18/20160.000.00292.500.00 0.00292.50 02/22/2016912828B820.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY0.25 02/29/2016 02/29/20160.000.00304.70405.22 0.00709.92 03/20/2014912828QX11,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY1.50 07/31/2016 07/31/20160.000.00-2,644.963,736.56 0.001,091.61 11/06/2014912828SY7500,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY0.625 05/31/2017 05/31/20170.000.00130.28776.98 0.00907.26 11/05/2015912828VL11,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY0.625 07/15/2016 07/15/20160.000.00-667.591,559.89 0.00892.30 06/01/2015912828RF91,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY1.00 08/31/2016 08/31/20160.000.00-1,405.962,490.44 0.001,084.49 10/31/2014912828RF91,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY1.00 08/31/2016 08/31/20160.000.00-1,041.022,490.44 0.001,449.43 11/25/2015912828WQ91,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY0.50 06/30/2016 06/30/20160.000.00-102.261,250.00 0.001,147.74 07/01/2014912828TS91,000,000.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY0.625 09/30/2017 09/30/20170.000.0015.131,553.96 0.001,569.09 10/26/2015912828PS30.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY2.00 01/31/2016 01/31/20160.000.00-1,376.791,630.43 0.00253.64 07/31/2014Income DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201610AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES718 * Weighted By: Ending Base Market Value + Accrued. * Holdings Displayed By: Lot.IdentifierBase Current Units DescriptionCoupon Final Maturity EffectiveMaturityTransfers In/Out Net RealizedGain/LossNet Amortization/Accretion IncomeInterest/DividendIncomeBaseExpenseBase Net Income Settle Date912828PS30.00 UNITED STATES TREASURY2.00 01/31/2016 01/31/20160.000.00-1,364.231,630.43 0.00266.21 12/31/201491412GEZ4300,000.00 UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS0.938 07/01/2017 07/01/20170.000.000.00489.19 0.00489.19 01/29/201691412GUT0250,000.00 UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS0.634 05/15/2016 05/15/20160.000.000.00396.25 0.00396.25 04/10/201490331HMR1450,000.00 US BANK NA0.919 01/26/2018 01/26/20180.000.00-114.44951.98 0.00837.54 05/12/201590331HMR1300,000.00 US BANK NA0.919 01/26/2018 01/26/20180.000.000.00634.65 0.00634.65 01/27/201590290XAB3469,028.41 USAOT-151-A20.82 03/15/2018 08/17/20160.00-0.003.43980.00 0.00983.42 07/29/2015928668AD4500,000.00 VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICAFINANCE LLC0.838 05/23/2016 05/23/20160.000.000.00883.68 0.00883.68 05/23/20149499173971,678,975.85 WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 03/31/20160.000.000.003,172.66 0.003,172.66 ------44,251,467.61 ------ 02/24/2017 12/20/20160.000.00-38,408.28111,988.26 -12,606.3260,973.67 ---Income DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201611AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES719 CESTIdentifier DescriptionBase Current Units Market Sector Rating Coupon FinalMaturity,EffectiveMaturityBookYield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book ValueBase Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossMarketPriceBase AccruedBalanceBase Market Value Base Market Value +Accrued949917397 WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,678,975.85 CashAAA 0.34 03/31/201603/31/20160.000.001,678,975.851,678,975.850.00 1.000.001,678,975.851,678,975.85CCYUSD Receivable1,204.47 CashAAA 0.00 03/31/201603/31/20160.000.001,204.471,204.470.00 1.000.001,204.471,204.47CCYUSD Cash-1.97 CashAAA 0.00 03/31/201603/31/20160.000.00-1.97-1.970.00 1.000.00-1.97-1.9789233GEJ1 Toyota Motor Credit Corporation500,000.00 Industrial A-1+ 0.00 05/18/201605/18/20160.5410.497499,355.00499,647.5027.84 99.9350.00499,675.34499,675.34------2,180,178.35 ---AAA --- 04/11/201604/11/20160.1240.1142,179,533.352,179,825.8527.84 ---0.002,179,853.692,179,853.69Identifier DescriptionBase Current Units Market Sector Rating Coupon FinalMaturity,EffectiveMaturityBookYield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book ValueBase Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossMarketPriceBase AccruedBalanceBase Market Value Base Market Value +Accrued459058DM2 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP750,000.00 Government AAA 0.50 05/16/201605/16/20160.51-0.128749,977.50749,989.98599.52 100.079 1,406.25750,589.50751,995.75459058DM2 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP1,000,000.00 Government AAA 0.50 05/16/201605/16/20160.507-0.128999,970.00999,991.82794.18 100.079 1,875.001,000,786.001,002,661.003130A4KE1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,000.00 Agency AAA 0.33 04/01/201604/01/20160.3450.00499,923.19500,000.000.00 100.00825.00500,000.00500,825.00605581FW2 MISSISSIPPI ST300,000.00 Municipal AA+ 0.64 10/01/201610/01/20160.640.371300,000.00300,000.00447.00 100.149960.00300,447.00301,407.0046623EJY6 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO500,000.00 Financial A+ 1.35 02/15/201702/15/20171.2551.095500,495.00500,409.30690.70 100.22862.50501,100.00501,962.5045905U7F5 INTERNATIONAL BK FOR RECON & DEVMEDIUM TERM BK N1,000,000.00 Government AAA 0.45 07/19/201607/19/20160.450.7431,000,000.001,000,000.00-880.00 99.912900.00999,120.001,000,020.0006050TLU4 BANK OF AMERICA NA500,000.00 Financial A+ 1.088 02/14/201702/14/20171.1091.659500,000.00500,000.0034.00 100.007680.13500,034.00500,714.1306406HBX6 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP750,000.00 Financial AA- 2.30 07/28/201607/28/20160.6440.703768,750.00753,993.68-116.18 100.517 3,018.75753,877.50756,896.25313384ZK8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,000.00 Agency A-1+ 0.00 07/15/201607/15/20160.6220.357498,263.19499,110.41364.59 99.8950.00499,475.00499,475.003137EADT3 FREDDIE MAC1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 0.875 02/22/201702/22/20170.7140.6551,001,470.001,001,422.16531.84 100.195947.921,001,954.001,002,901.923133EFBT3 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORP1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 0.42 09/01/201609/01/20160.440.529999,800.00999,916.39-368.39 99.955350.00999,548.00999,898.00762494QV7 RIALTO CALIF UNI SCH DIST250,000.00 Municipal AA 1.258 02/01/201702/01/20171.2580.728250,000.00250,000.001,162.50 100.465524.17251,162.50251,686.6703255LGX1 ANAHEIM CALIF PUB FING AUTH LEASEREV750,000.00 Municipal AA- 1.00 05/01/201605/01/20161.000.777750,000.00750,000.00247.50 100.033 3,125.00750,247.50753,372.50912828QX1 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 1.50 07/31/201607/31/20160.4340.3791,018,398.441,003,516.92232.08 100.375 2,513.741,003,749.001,006,262.744197915E4 HAWAII ST750,000.00 Municipal AA 0.731 08/01/201608/01/20160.7310.311750,000.00750,000.001,117.50 100.149913.75751,117.50752,031.2569353RCG1 PNC BANK NA750,000.00 Financial A+ 1.125 01/27/201712/28/20161.1250.978750,000.00750,000.00808.50 100.108 1,500.00750,808.50752,308.50313373SZ6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 2.125 06/10/201606/10/20160.500.4441,030,688.001,003,090.88123.12 100.321 6,552.081,003,214.001,009,766.083130A3J70 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 0.625 11/23/201611/23/20160.4840.5521,002,130.001,000,905.73-435.73 100.047 2,222.221,000,470.001,002,692.2291412GUT0 UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS250,000.00 Municipal AA 0.634 05/15/201605/15/20160.6340.338250,000.00250,000.00132.50 100.053598.78250,132.50250,731.28Balance Sheet ClassificationWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201612AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES720 LTIdentifier DescriptionBase Current Units Market Sector Rating Coupon FinalMaturity,EffectiveMaturityBookYield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book ValueBase Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossMarketPriceBase AccruedBalanceBase Market Value Base Market Value +Accrued097023BC8 BOEING CO750,000.00 Industrial A3.75 11/20/201611/20/20160.8490.996789,135.00763,732.61-697.61 101.738 10,234.38763,035.00773,269.3845905UQG2 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP600,000.00 Government AAA 0.625 09/26/201609/26/20160.6910.314599,730.00599,806.991,099.61 100.15152.08600,906.60600,958.68928668AD4 VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICAFINANCE LLC500,000.00 Industrial A- 0.838 05/23/201605/23/20160.8372.415500,000.00500,000.00-1,158.50 99.768442.38498,841.50499,283.88912828VL1 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 0.625 07/15/201607/15/20160.3560.3561,003,007.811,000,770.2910.71 100.078 1,322.121,000,781.001,002,103.124581X0BV9 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENTBANK1,000,000.00 Government AAA 1.125 03/15/201703/15/20170.8290.831,003,030.001,002,804.36-1.36 100.28500.001,002,803.001,003,303.004581X0BV9 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENTBANK600,000.00 Government AAA 1.125 03/15/201703/15/20170.7860.83602,208.00601,930.61-248.81 100.28300.00601,681.80601,981.803137EACW7 FREDDIE MAC235,000.00 Agency AAA 2.00 08/25/201608/25/20160.8270.514236,903.50236,094.14298.71 100.593470.00236,392.85236,862.853130A2T97 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 0.50 09/28/201609/28/20160.3860.5111,001,080.001,000,557.02-611.02 99.99541.67999,946.00999,987.673130A2T97 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,000.00 Agency AAA 0.50 09/28/201609/28/20160.4160.511500,415.00500,205.22-232.22 99.99520.83499,973.00499,993.8314912L4X6 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESCORP775,000.00 Industrial A2.05 08/01/201608/01/20160.6430.686793,855.75778,616.98-106.23 100.453 2,647.92778,510.75781,158.6776912TJC8 RIVERSIDE CNTY CALIF PUB FINGAUTH TAX ALLOC REV125,000.00 Municipal A1.00 09/01/201609/01/20161.3011.201124,468.75124,845.1866.07 99.929104.17124,911.25125,015.42544587B72 LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORPLEASE REV490,000.00 Municipal A+ 1.26 11/01/201611/01/20161.260.961490,000.00490,000.00935.90 100.191 2,263.80490,935.90493,199.70912828RF9 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 1.00 08/31/201608/31/20160.5790.4071,003,203.131,001,738.84722.16 100.246869.571,002,461.001,003,330.57912828RF9 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 1.00 08/31/201608/31/20160.4320.4071,010,351.561,002,348.41112.59 100.246869.571,002,461.001,003,330.5768428LDM3 ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG250,000.00 Municipal AA 0.938 11/01/201611/01/20160.9380.681250,000.00250,000.00417.50 100.167508.08250,417.50250,925.58912828WQ9 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 0.50 06/30/201606/30/20160.4590.3121,000,820.311,000,101.13366.87 100.047 1,263.741,000,468.001,001,731.74------24,375,000.00 ---AA+ --- 09/11/201609/10/20160.6470.58524,528,074.1324,415,899.076,459.57 --- 51,685.57 24,422,358.64 24,474,044.21Identifier DescriptionBase Current Units Market Sector Rating Coupon FinalMaturity,EffectiveMaturityBookYield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book ValueBase Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossMarketPriceBase AccruedBalanceBase Market Value Base Market Value +Accrued58772PAB4 MBART-151-A2A601,419.56 Asset Backed AAA 0.82 06/15/201809/30/20161.040.962600,573.82600,769.91212.24 99.927219.18600,982.15601,201.3391412GEZ4 UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS300,000.00 Municipal AA 0.938 07/01/201707/01/20170.950.56300,000.00300,000.00-93.00 99.969242.32299,907.00300,149.3290331HMR1 US BANK NA450,000.00 Financial AA 0.919 01/26/201801/26/20180.831.441451,206.00450,797.29-2,757.04 99.564758.26448,040.25448,798.5190331HMR1 US BANK NA300,000.00 Financial AA 0.919 01/26/201801/26/20180.9331.441300,000.00300,000.00-1,306.50 99.564505.50298,693.50299,199.0130231GAS1 EXXON MOBIL CORP560,000.00 UtilityAAA 1.232 02/28/201802/28/20181.2481.321560,000.00560,000.001,695.12 100.303555.59561,695.12562,250.7189236WAB4 TART-15A-A2324,017.78 Asset Backed AAA 0.71 07/17/201706/19/20160.710.901324,014.70324,016.86-141.20 99.956102.25323,875.67323,977.9117275RAY8 CISCO SYSTEMS INC750,000.00 Industrial AA- 0.944 06/15/201806/15/20180.9581.267750,000.00750,000.00-1,746.75 99.767334.28748,253.25748,587.53084664CD1 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCECORP750,000.00 Financial AA 0.921 01/12/201801/12/20180.9361.211750,000.00750,000.00-35.25 99.995 1,535.17749,964.75751,499.92Balance Sheet ClassificationWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201613AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES721 SummaryIdentifier DescriptionBase Current Units Market Sector Rating Coupon FinalMaturity,EffectiveMaturityBookYield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book ValueBase Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossMarketPriceBase AccruedBalanceBase Market Value Base Market Value +Accrued3137EADF3 FREDDIE MAC1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 1.25 05/12/201705/12/20170.8170.6951,005,120.001,004,778.671,368.33 100.615 4,826.391,006,147.001,010,973.39637432HT5 NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPFINANCE CORP500,000.00 Financial A+ 5.45 04/10/201704/10/20171.0841.115525,350.00522,203.51-176.51 104.405 12,943.75522,027.00534,970.7543814KAB7 HONDO-151-A2159,462.77 Asset Backed AAA 0.70 06/15/201706/12/20160.7050.831159,454.44159,460.77-43.25 99.97249.61159,417.51159,467.12313379FW4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 1.00 06/09/201706/09/20170.7410.6831,003,060.001,003,052.97692.03 100.374 3,111.111,003,745.001,006,856.1141284BAB2 HARLY-151-A2A247,941.38 Asset Backed AAA 0.80 01/15/201909/11/20160.801.015247,939.37247,940.48-243.27 99.90288.16247,697.20247,785.36880591EA6 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY586,000.00 Agency AAA 5.50 07/18/201707/18/20170.8760.805621,019.36620,798.65629.15 106.046 6,535.53621,427.80627,963.33161571GJ7 CHAIT 2014-A1 A1775,000.00 Asset Backed AAA 1.15 01/15/201901/14/20171.0220.93776,453.13775,799.36528.06 100.171396.11776,327.42776,723.53912828TS9 UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,000.00 Government AAA 0.625 09/30/201709/30/20170.6310.711999,882.81999,909.07-1,198.07 99.87117.08998,711.00998,728.0806050TMB5 BANK OF AMERICA NA250,000.00 Financial A+ 1.086 06/05/201706/05/20171.1021.747250,000.00250,000.00-336.75 99.865188.47249,663.25249,851.7209247XAC5 BLACKROCK INC500,000.00 Financial AA- 6.25 09/15/201709/15/20171.2421.129539,065.00536,018.34839.16 107.371 1,388.89536,857.50538,246.39912828SY7 UNITED STATES TREASURY500,000.00 Government AAA 0.625 05/31/201705/31/20170.730.675499,179.69499,391.57315.43 99.941 1,050.20499,707.00500,757.20166764AL4 CHEVRON CORP700,000.00 UtilityAA+ 1.345 11/15/201711/15/20171.5060.97698,005.00698,196.596,020.21 100.602 3,556.78704,216.80707,773.5831680GAB2 FTAT-151-A2A500,000.00 Asset Backed AAA 1.02 05/15/201810/18/20161.0231.051499,986.35499,990.17-84.22 99.981226.67499,905.95500,132.623135G0JA2 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATION1,000,000.00 Agency AAA 1.125 04/27/201704/27/20170.8180.6861,003,410.001,003,259.931,425.07 100.469 4,812.501,004,685.001,009,497.5047787WAB5 JDOT-15B-A2400,000.00 Asset Backed AAA 0.98 06/15/201811/16/20160.9831.064399,986.52399,991.24-208.24 99.946174.22399,783.00399,957.2290290XAB3 USAOT-151-A2469,028.41 Asset Backed AAA 0.82 03/15/201808/17/20160.8250.956469,010.95469,019.49-238.26 99.947170.93468,781.23468,952.1602665WAY7 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP500,000.00 Industrial A+ 1.073 09/20/201709/20/20171.0911.367500,000.00500,000.00932.50 100.186178.90500,932.50501,111.4002665WAY7 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP250,000.00 Industrial A+ 1.073 09/20/201709/20/20171.0771.367250,057.50250,050.04416.21 100.18689.45250,466.25250,555.7041284AAB4 HARLY-141-A2A29,979.48 Asset Backed AAA 0.49 04/15/201805/06/20160.4910.92129,977.4529,979.28-13.04 99.9566.5329,966.2529,972.77191216BR0 COCA-COLA CO300,000.00 Industrial AA- 0.875 10/27/201710/27/20170.8970.762299,868.00299,896.35631.35 100.176 1,122.92300,527.70301,650.6265477WAB2 NART-14B-A2193,439.89 Asset Backed AAA 0.60 06/15/201705/10/20160.6021.011193,429.51193,438.48-92.62 99.95151.58193,345.86193,397.44437076BJ0 HOME DEPOT INC750,000.00 Industrial A 1.004 09/15/201709/15/20171.021.184750,000.00750,000.002,625.00 100.35355.53752,625.00752,980.5305581RAC0 BMWLT-161-A2B600,000.00 Asset Backed AAA 0.932 01/22/201805/02/20170.9471.255600,000.00600,000.0053.82 100.009170.88600,053.82600,224.7007330NAH8 BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO700,000.00 Financial A+ 1.00 04/03/201704/03/20171.301.088697,690.00697,906.741,475.86 99.912 3,461.11699,382.60702,843.7117305EFE0 CCCIT-13A6-A6750,000.00 Asset Backed AAA 1.32 09/07/201809/07/20160.9490.886751,787.11751,198.95184.65 100.184660.00751,383.60752,043.60------17,696,289.26 ---AA+ --- 11/17/201706/06/20170.9530.99417,805,526.7117,797,864.7011,330.23 --- 49,885.85 17,809,194.93 17,859,080.78Balance Sheet ClassificationWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201614AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES722 * Grouped By: BS Class 2. * Groups Sorted By: BS Class 2. * Weighted By: Base Market Value + Accrued.Identifier DescriptionBase Current Units Market Sector Rating Coupon FinalMaturity,EffectiveMaturityBookYield,YieldBase Original Cost,Base Book ValueBase Net TotalUnrealized Gain/LossMarketPriceBase AccruedBalanceBase Market Value Base Market Value +Accrued------44,251,467.61 ---AA+ --- 02/24/201712/20/20160.7440.72644,513,134.1944,393,589.6317,817.64 --- 101,571.42 44,411,407.26 44,512,978.68Balance Sheet ClassificationWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201615AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES723 * Does not Lock Down.BuyTrade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount01/07/201601/12/2016Buy02665WAY7AMERICAN HONDA FINANCECORP1.02 09/20/2017 APX Asset250,000.00250,000.00100.0230.00250,057.50162.840.00 0.00-250,220.3402/09/201602/17/2016Buy05581RAC0BMWLT-161-A2B0.939 01/22/2018 Bank of America600,000.00600,000.00100.000.00600,000.000.000.00 0.00-600,000.0002/18/201602/23/2016Buy07330NAH8BRANCH BANKING AND TRUSTCO1.00 04/03/2017 BB & T CAPITAL MARKETS700,000.00700,000.0099.670.00697,690.002,722.220.00 0.00-700,412.2202/10/201602/16/2016Buy09247XAC5BLACKROCK INC6.25 09/15/2017 APX Asset500,000.00500,000.00107.8130.00539,065.0013,107.640.00 0.00-552,172.6401/26/201601/29/2016Buy166764AL4CHEVRON CORP1.345 11/15/2017 JEFFERIES & COMPANY, INC.700,000.00700,000.0099.7150.00698,005.001,935.310.00 0.00-699,940.3101/11/201601/14/2016Buy17305EFE0CCCIT-13A6-A61.32 09/07/2018 Bank of America750,000.00750,000.00100.2380.00751,787.113,492.500.00 0.00-755,279.6102/29/201603/03/2016Buy30231GAS1EXXON MOBIL CORP0.60 02/28/2018 Citigroup Global Markets (AU)560,000.00560,000.00100.000.00560,000.000.000.00 0.00-560,000.0003/30/201603/31/2016Buy313379FW4FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1.00 06/09/2017 FIRST TENNESSEE BANK N ABOND1,000,000.001,000,000.00100.3060.001,003,060.003,111.110.00 0.00 -1,006,171.1103/10/201603/14/2016Buy3135G0JA2FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATION1.125 04/27/2017 FIRST TENNESSEE BANK N ABOND1,000,000.001,000,000.00100.3410.001,003,410.004,281.250.00 0.00 -1,007,691.2503/02/201603/03/2016Buy3137EADF3FREDDIE MAC1.25 05/12/2017 FIRST TENNESSEE BANK N ABOND1,000,000.001,000,000.00100.5120.001,005,120.003,854.170.00 0.00 -1,008,974.1703/18/201603/21/2016Buy3137EADT3FREDDIE MAC0.875 02/22/2017 Links Securities1,000,000.001,000,000.00100.1470.001,001,470.00704.860.00 0.00 -1,002,174.8602/08/201602/11/2016Buy4581X0BV9INTER-AMERICANDEVELOPMENT BANK1.125 03/15/2017 Susquehanna Fin. Grp.600,000.00600,000.00100.3680.00602,208.002,737.500.00 0.00-604,945.5003/01/201603/04/2016Buy4581X0BV9INTER-AMERICANDEVELOPMENT BANK1.125 03/15/2017 Goldman Sachs & Co. (AU)1,000,000.001,000,000.00100.3030.001,003,030.005,281.250.00 0.00 -1,008,311.2502/02/201602/05/2016Buy459058DM2INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION ANDDEVELOP0.50 05/16/2016 CastleOak Securities LP750,000.00750,000.0099.9970.00749,977.50822.920.00 0.00-750,800.4201/20/201601/21/2016Buy45905UQG2INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION ANDDEVELOP0.625 09/26/2016 CastleOak Securities LP600,000.00600,000.0099.9550.00599,730.001,197.920.00 0.00-600,927.9201/20/201601/25/2016Buy46623EJY6JPMORGAN CHASE & CO1.35 02/15/2017 CANTOR FITZGERALD & CO.INC.500,000.00500,000.00100.0990.00500,495.003,000.000.00 0.00-503,495.0002/03/201602/08/2016Buy637432HT5NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIESCOOP FINANCE CORP5.45 04/10/2017 Susquehanna Fin. Grp.500,000.00500,000.00105.070.00525,350.008,931.940.00 0.00-534,281.9401/08/201601/13/2016Buy68428LDM3ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSIONOBLIG0.938 11/01/2016 Stifel Nicolaus & Co.250,000.00250,000.00100.000.00250,000.000.000.00 0.00-250,000.0001/28/201602/02/2016Buy69353RCG1PNC BANK NA1.125 01/27/2017 CANTOR FITZGERALD & CO.INC.750,000.00750,000.00100.000.00750,000.00117.190.00 0.00-750,117.1903/28/201603/29/2016Buy880591EA6TENNESSEE VALLEYAUTHORITY5.50 07/18/2017 CastleOak Securities LP586,000.00586,000.00105.9760.00621,019.366,356.470.00 0.00-627,375.8302/19/201602/22/2016Buy89233GEJ1Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.00 05/18/2016 Toyota Motor Credit Corp.500,000.00500,000.0099.8710.00499,355.000.000.00 0.00-499,355.0001/26/201601/29/2016Buy91412GEZ4UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS0.927 07/01/2017 Citigroup Global Markets (AU)300,000.00300,000.00100.000.00300,000.00193.330.00 0.00-300,193.3303/07/201603/07/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct593,977.73593,977.731.00593,977.73593,977.730.000.00 0.00-593,977.73Trading ActivityWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201616AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES724 Trade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount03/07/201603/07/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct4,500.004,500.001.004,500.004,500.000.000.00 0.00-4,500.0003/11/201603/11/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct0.050.051.000.050.050.000.00 0.00-0.0503/10/201603/10/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct1,010,000.001,010,000.001.00 1,010,000.001,010,000.000.000.00 0.00 -1,010,000.0003/09/201603/09/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct451.66451.661.00451.66451.660.000.00 0.00-451.6603/16/201603/16/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct3,375.003,375.001.003,375.003,375.000.000.00 0.00-3,375.0003/15/201603/15/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct190,828.35190,828.351.00190,828.35190,828.350.000.00 0.00-190,828.3503/15/201603/15/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct43,968.8343,968.831.0043,968.8343,968.830.000.00 0.00-43,968.8303/15/201603/15/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct49,024.6049,024.601.0049,024.6049,024.600.000.00 0.00-49,024.6003/22/201603/22/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct511.09511.091.00511.09511.090.000.00 0.00-511.0903/21/201603/21/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct1,932.801,932.801.001,932.801,932.800.000.00 0.00-1,932.8003/28/201603/28/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct5,625.005,625.001.005,625.005,625.000.000.00 0.00-5,625.0003/30/201603/30/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct1,878.001,878.001.001,878.001,878.000.000.00 0.00-1,878.0001/04/201601/04/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct401,197.38401,197.381.00401,197.38401,197.380.000.00 0.00-401,197.3801/08/201601/08/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct1,759.501,759.501.001,759.501,759.500.000.00 0.00-1,759.5001/08/201601/08/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct750,000.00750,000.001.00750,000.00750,000.000.000.00 0.00-750,000.0001/15/201601/15/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct3,125.003,125.001.003,125.003,125.000.000.00 0.00-3,125.0001/15/201601/15/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct951,080.26951,080.261.00951,080.26951,080.260.000.00 0.00-951,080.2601/19/201601/19/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct63,909.3163,909.311.0063,909.3163,909.310.000.00 0.00-63,909.3101/22/201601/22/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct1,243.061,243.061.001,243.061,243.060.000.00 0.00-1,243.0601/22/201601/22/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct1,000,000.001,000,000.001.00 1,000,000.001,000,000.000.000.00 0.00 -1,000,000.0001/21/201601/21/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct400,522.08400,522.081.00400,522.08400,522.080.000.00 0.00-400,522.0801/28/201601/28/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct761,625.00761,625.001.00761,625.00761,625.000.000.00 0.00-761,625.0001/28/201601/28/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct246.50246.501.00246.50246.500.000.00 0.00-246.5001/26/201601/26/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct1,188.141,188.141.001,188.141,188.140.000.00 0.00-1,188.1402/01/201602/01/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct2,830,625.962,830,625.961.00 2,830,625.962,830,625.960.000.00 0.00 -2,830,625.9602/01/201602/01/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct2,656.162,656.161.002,656.162,656.160.000.00 0.00-2,656.1602/05/201602/05/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct249,199.58249,199.581.00249,199.58249,199.580.000.00 0.00-249,199.5802/05/201602/05/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct14.7314.731.0014.7314.730.000.00 0.00-14.7302/16/201602/16/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct578,446.84578,446.841.00578,446.84578,446.840.000.00 0.00-578,446.8402/16/201602/16/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct788,507.93788,507.931.00788,507.93788,507.930.000.00 0.00-788,507.93Trading ActivityWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201617AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES725 MaturityTrade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount02/16/201602/16/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct14.1414.141.0014.1414.140.000.00 0.00-14.1402/19/201602/19/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct183.52183.521.00183.52183.520.000.00 0.00-183.5202/19/201602/19/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct500,000.00500,000.001.00500,000.00500,000.000.000.00 0.00-500,000.0002/25/201602/25/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct2,350.002,350.001.002,350.002,350.000.000.00 0.00-2,350.0002/23/201602/23/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct765.00765.001.00765.00765.000.000.00 0.00-765.0002/29/201602/29/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct1,000,000.001,000,000.001.00 1,000,000.001,000,000.000.000.00 0.00 -1,000,000.0002/29/201602/29/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct1,250.001,250.001.001,250.001,250.000.000.00 0.00-1,250.0002/29/201602/29/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct10,000.0010,000.001.0010,000.0010,000.000.000.00 0.00-10,000.0003/01/201603/01/2016Buy949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct754,265.04754,265.041.00754,265.04754,265.040.000.00 0.00-754,265.04------Buy--------- ------27,356,248.2427,356,248.24--- 12,960,248.2427,471,077.7162,010.420.00 0.00 -27,533,088.13Trade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount01/22/201601/22/2016Maturity3130A3XU3FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.25 01/22/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00-1,000,000.00100.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00 0.00 1,000,000.0002/05/201602/05/2016Maturity313384SS9FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00 02/05/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00-1,000,000.00100.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00 0.00 1,000,000.0001/21/201601/21/2016Maturity3133EDQW5FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORP0.29 01/21/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00-1,000,000.00100.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00 0.00 1,000,000.0003/10/201603/10/2016Maturity3136FPET0FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATION2.00 03/10/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00-1,000,000.00100.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00 0.00 1,000,000.0001/08/201601/08/2016Maturity36962G6Q2GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITALCORP0.918 01/08/2016 Maturity-750,000.00-750,000.00100.000.00-750,000.000.000.00 0.00750,000.0002/15/201602/15/2016Maturity459056HY6INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION ANDDEVELOP0.00 02/15/2016 Maturity-163,000.00-163,000.00100.000.00-163,000.000.000.00 0.00163,000.0002/15/201602/15/2016Maturity459056HY6INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION ANDDEVELOP0.00 02/15/2016 Maturity-771,000.00-771,000.00100.000.00-771,000.000.000.00 0.00771,000.0001/15/201601/15/2016Maturity46625HHW3JPMORGAN CHASE & CO2.60 01/15/2016 Maturity-750,000.00-750,000.00100.000.00-750,000.000.000.00 0.00750,000.0001/01/201601/01/2016Maturity5446462Q4LOS ANGELES CALIF UNI SCHDIST0.486 01/01/2016 Maturity-400,000.00-400,000.00100.000.00-400,000.000.000.00 0.00400,000.0002/01/201602/01/2016Maturity68428LDH4ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSIONOBLIG0.68 02/01/2016 Maturity-300,000.00-300,000.00100.000.00-300,000.000.000.00 0.00300,000.0002/01/201602/01/2016Maturity68428LDH4ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSIONOBLIG0.68 02/01/2016 Maturity-490,000.00-490,000.00100.000.00-490,000.000.000.00 0.00490,000.0001/28/201601/28/2016Maturity69349LAH1PNC BANK,NA0.80 01/28/2016 Maturity-750,000.00-750,000.00100.000.00-750,000.000.000.00 0.00750,000.0003/07/201603/07/2016Maturity857477AH6STATE STREET CORP2.875 03/07/2016 Maturity-300,000.00-300,000.00100.000.00-300,000.000.000.00 0.00300,000.00Trading ActivityWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201618AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES726 Principal PaydownTrade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount03/07/201603/07/2016Maturity857477AH6STATE STREET CORP2.875 03/07/2016 Maturity-285,000.00-285,000.00100.000.00-285,000.000.000.00 0.00285,000.0003/01/201603/01/2016Maturity89116EC19Toronto Dominion Holdings(U.S.A.), Inc.0.00 03/01/2016 Maturity-750,000.00-750,000.00100.000.00-750,000.000.000.00 0.00750,000.0002/19/201602/19/2016Maturity89233AHP7Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.601 02/19/2016 Maturity-500,000.00-500,000.00100.000.00-500,000.000.000.00 0.00500,000.0002/29/201602/29/2016Maturity912828B82UNITED STATES TREASURY0.25 02/29/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00-1,000,000.00100.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00 0.00 1,000,000.0001/31/201601/31/2016Maturity912828PS3UNITED STATES TREASURY2.00 01/31/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00-1,000,000.00100.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00 0.00 1,000,000.0001/31/201601/31/2016Maturity912828PS3UNITED STATES TREASURY2.00 01/31/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00-1,000,000.00100.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00 0.00 1,000,000.00------Maturity--------- ---Maturity-13,209,000.00-13,209,000.00100.000.00-13,209,000.000.000.00 0.00 13,209,000.00Trade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount02/15/201602/15/2016Principal Paydown 31679KAB6FTAT-142-A2A0.45 04/17/2017 Direct0.00-37,707.33---0.00-37,707.330.00-0.00 0.0037,707.3301/15/201601/15/2016Principal Paydown 31679KAB6FTAT-142-A2A0.45 04/17/2017 Direct0.00-49,014.59---0.00-49,014.590.000.00 0.0049,014.5903/15/201603/15/2016Principal Paydown 41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018 Direct0.00-12,203.47---0.00-12,203.470.000.00 0.0012,203.4702/15/201602/15/2016Principal Paydown 41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018 Direct0.00-11,058.31---0.00-11,058.310.000.00 0.0011,058.3101/15/201601/15/2016Principal Paydown 41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018 Direct0.00-12,561.40---0.00-12,561.400.000.00 0.0012,561.4003/15/201603/15/2016Principal Paydown 41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019 Direct0.00-24,505.12---0.00-24,505.120.00-0.00 0.0024,505.1202/15/201602/15/2016Principal Paydown 41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019 Direct0.00-21,398.57---0.00-21,398.570.00-0.00 0.0021,398.5701/15/201601/15/2016Principal Paydown 41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019 Direct0.00-25,559.26---0.00-25,559.260.000.00 0.0025,559.2602/15/201602/15/2016Principal Paydown 43814KAB7HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017 Direct0.00-27,984.92---0.00-27,984.920.000.00 0.0027,984.9203/15/201603/15/2016Principal Paydown 43814KAB7HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017 Direct0.00-32,557.23---0.00-32,557.230.00-0.00 0.0032,557.2301/15/201601/15/2016Principal Paydown 43814KAB7HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017 Direct0.00-32,960.70---0.00-32,960.700.000.00 0.0032,960.7003/15/201603/15/2016Principal Paydown 58772PAB4MBART-151-A2A0.82 06/15/2018 Direct0.00-48,580.44---0.00-48,580.440.000.00 0.0048,580.4402/15/201602/15/2016Principal Paydown 65477WAB2NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017 Direct0.00-66,720.53---0.00-66,720.530.00-0.00 0.0066,720.5303/15/201603/15/2016Principal Paydown 65477WAB2NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017 Direct0.00-67,654.27---0.00-67,654.270.000.00 0.0067,654.2701/15/201601/15/2016Principal Paydown 65477WAB2NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017 Direct0.00-68,676.29---0.00-68,676.290.00-0.00 0.0068,676.2902/15/201602/15/2016Principal Paydown 89236WAB4TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017 Direct0.00-54,524.90---0.00-54,524.900.000.00 0.0054,524.9001/15/201601/15/2016Principal Paydown 89236WAB4TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017 Direct0.00-60,751.76---0.00-60,751.760.000.00 0.0060,751.7603/15/201603/15/2016Principal Paydown 89236WAB4TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017 Direct0.00-56,561.02---0.00-56,561.020.000.00 0.0056,561.0203/15/201603/15/2016Principal Paydown 90290XAB3USAOT-151-A20.82 03/15/2018 Direct0.00-10,971.59---0.00-10,971.590.00-0.00 0.0010,971.59Trading ActivityWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201619AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES727 SellTrade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount------Principal Paydown --------- ---Direct0.00-721,951.70---0.00-721,951.700.000.00 0.00721,951.70Trade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount02/16/201602/16/2016Sell05531FAG8BB&T CORP3.20 03/15/2016 Not Provided-750,000.00-750,000.00100.000.00-750,000.00-10,066.670.00 0.00760,066.6703/16/201603/16/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct-3,375.00-3,375.001.00-3,375.00-3,375.000.000.00 0.003,375.0003/14/201603/14/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct-1,007,691.25-1,007,691.251.00 -1,007,691.25-1,007,691.250.000.00 0.00 1,007,691.2503/21/201603/21/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct-1,006,333.73-1,006,333.731.00 -1,006,333.73-1,006,333.730.000.00 0.00 1,006,333.7303/31/201603/31/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct-1,003,046.11-1,003,046.111.00 -1,003,046.11-1,003,046.110.000.00 0.00 1,003,046.1103/30/201603/30/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct-1,875.00-1,875.001.00-1,875.00-1,875.000.000.00 0.001,875.0003/29/201603/29/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct-627,375.83-627,375.831.00-627,375.83-627,375.830.000.00 0.00627,375.8301/12/201601/12/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct-249,043.79-249,043.791.00-249,043.79-249,043.790.000.00 0.00249,043.7901/14/201601/14/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct-755,279.61-755,279.611.00-755,279.61-755,279.610.000.00 0.00755,279.6101/13/201601/13/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct-250,000.00-250,000.001.00-250,000.00-250,000.000.000.00 0.00250,000.0001/20/201601/20/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct-2,537.50-2,537.501.00-2,537.50-2,537.500.000.00 0.002,537.5001/20/201601/20/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct-1,728.09-1,728.091.00-1,728.09-1,728.090.000.00 0.001,728.0901/26/201601/26/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct-14.73-14.731.00-14.73-14.730.000.00 0.0014.7301/25/201601/25/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct-503,495.00-503,495.001.00-503,495.00-503,495.000.000.00 0.00503,495.0001/29/201601/29/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016 Direct-1,000,133.64-1,000,133.641.00 -1,000,133.64-1,000,133.640.000.00 0.00 1,000,133.6402/02/201602/02/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct-750,117.19-750,117.191.00-750,117.19-750,117.190.000.00 0.00750,117.1902/08/201602/08/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct-534,281.94-534,281.941.00-534,281.94-534,281.940.000.00 0.00534,281.9402/11/201602/11/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct-604,945.50-604,945.501.00-604,945.50-604,945.500.000.00 0.00604,945.5002/10/201602/10/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct-0.11-0.111.00-0.11-0.110.000.00 0.000.1102/17/201602/17/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct-598,194.69-598,194.691.00-598,194.69-598,194.690.000.00 0.00598,194.6902/23/201602/23/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct-700,412.22-700,412.221.00-700,412.22-700,412.220.000.00 0.00700,412.2202/22/201602/22/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016 Direct-503,534.36-503,534.361.00-503,534.36-503,534.360.000.00 0.00503,534.3603/04/201603/04/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct-1,008,311.25-1,008,311.251.00 -1,008,311.25-1,008,311.250.000.00 0.00 1,008,311.2503/03/201603/03/2016Sell949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016 Direct-1,568,974.17-1,568,974.171.00 -1,568,974.17-1,568,974.170.000.00 0.00 1,568,974.17------Sell--------- -------13,430,700.71-13,430,700.71--- -12,680,700.71-13,430,700.71-10,066.670.00 0.00 13,440,767.38Trading ActivityWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201620AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES728 Summary * Grouped By: Transaction Type. * Groups Sorted By: Transaction Type. * Showing transactions with Trade Date within selected date range. * MMF transactions are expanded. * The Transaction Detail/Trading Activity reports provide our most up-to-date transactional details. As such, these reports are subject to change even after the other reports on the website have been locked down. While these reports can be useful tools in understanding recent activity,due to their dynamic nature we do not recommend using them for booking journal entries or reconciliation.Trade Date,Settle DateTransaction Type Identifier,DescriptionCouponRateFinalMaturityBroker/DealerBase Original Units,Base Current UnitsPrice Purchased Cost,Base PrincipalBase AccruedInterestBase Net TotalRealized GainBaseCommissionBase Amount------------------ ------716,547.53-5,404.17---279,547.53109,425.3051,943.750.00 0.00-161,369.05Trading ActivityWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201621AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES729 * Does not Lock Down.ReceivableSettledEntry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount03/31/2016 03/31/2016 Money Market Funds0.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016---1,202.8003/31/2016 03/31/2016 Money Market Funds0.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/2016---1,202.80Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount01/07/2016 01/12/2016 Buy250,000.00 02665WAY7AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP1.02 09/20/2017100.023-250,220.3403/20/2016 03/20/2016 Coupon0.00 02665WAY7AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP1.073 09/20/2017---1,932.8002/16/2016 02/16/2016 Sell-750,000.00 05531FAG8BB&T CORP3.20 03/15/2016100.00760,066.6703/21/2016 03/21/2016 Coupon0.00 05581RAC0BMWLT-161-A2B0.932 01/22/2018---511.0902/09/2016 02/17/2016 Buy600,000.00 05581RAC0BMWLT-161-A2B0.939 01/22/2018100.00-600,000.0002/16/2016 02/16/2016 Coupon0.00 06050TLU4BANK OF AMERICA NA1.088 02/14/2017---1,062.6003/07/2016 03/07/2016 Coupon0.00 06050TMB5BANK OF AMERICA NA1.086 06/05/2017---570.0101/28/2016 01/28/2016 Coupon0.00 06406HBX6BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP2.30 07/28/2016---8,625.0002/18/2016 02/23/2016 Buy700,000.00 07330NAH8BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO1.00 04/03/201799.67-700,412.2201/12/2016 01/12/2016 Coupon0.00 084664CD1BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCE CORP0.921 01/12/2018---1,176.5502/10/2016 02/16/2016 Buy500,000.00 09247XAC5BLACKROCK INC6.25 09/15/2017107.813-552,172.6403/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 09247XAC5BLACKROCK INC6.25 09/15/2017---15,625.0002/01/2016 02/01/2016 Coupon0.00 14912L4X6CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP2.05 08/01/2016---7,943.7502/15/2016 02/15/2016 Coupon0.00 161571GJ7CHAIT 2014-A1 A11.15 01/15/2019---742.7103/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 161571GJ7CHAIT 2014-A1 A11.15 01/15/2019---742.7101/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 161571GJ7CHAIT 2014-A1 A11.15 01/15/2019---742.7101/26/2016 01/29/2016 Buy700,000.00 166764AL4CHEVRON CORP1.345 11/15/201799.715-699,940.3103/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 17275RAY8CISCO SYSTEMS INC0.944 06/15/2018---1,558.3701/11/2016 01/14/2016 Buy750,000.00 17305EFE0CCCIT-13A6-A61.32 09/07/2018100.238-755,279.6103/07/2016 03/07/2016 Coupon0.00 17305EFE0CCCIT-13A6-A61.32 09/07/2018---4,950.0002/29/2016 03/03/2016 Buy560,000.00 30231GAS1EXXON MOBIL CORP0.60 02/28/2018100.00-560,000.0003/28/2016 03/28/2016 Coupon0.00 3130A2T97FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.50 09/28/2016---3,750.0001/22/2016 01/22/2016 Coupon0.00 3130A3XU3FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.25 01/22/2016---1,243.0601/22/2016 01/22/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00 3130A3XU3FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.25 01/22/2016100.001,000,000.0003/30/2016 03/31/2016 Buy1,000,000.00 313379FW4FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1.00 06/09/2017100.306-1,006,171.1102/05/2016 02/05/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00 313384SS9FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.00 02/05/2016100.001,000,000.0001/21/2016 01/21/2016 Coupon0.00 3133EDQW5FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP0.29 01/21/2016---1,450.0001/21/2016 01/21/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00 3133EDQW5FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP0.29 01/21/2016100.001,000,000.0003/01/2016 03/01/2016 Coupon0.00 3133EFBT3FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS FUNDINGCORP0.42 09/01/2016---2,100.0003/10/2016 03/14/2016 Buy1,000,000.00 3135G0JA2FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 1.125 04/27/2017100.341-1,007,691.2503/10/2016 03/10/2016 Coupon0.00 3136FPET0FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 2.00 03/10/2016---10,000.0003/10/2016 03/10/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00 3136FPET0FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION 2.00 03/10/2016100.001,000,000.0002/25/2016 02/25/2016 Coupon0.00 3137EACW7FREDDIE MAC2.00 08/25/2016---2,350.0003/02/2016 03/03/2016 Buy1,000,000.00 3137EADF3FREDDIE MAC1.25 05/12/2017100.512-1,008,974.1703/18/2016 03/21/2016 Buy1,000,000.00 3137EADT3FREDDIE MAC0.875 02/22/2017100.147-1,002,174.8602/15/2016 02/15/2016 Coupon0.00 31679KAB6FTAT-142-A2A0.45 04/17/2017---14.1402/15/2016 02/15/2016 Principal Paydown-37,707.33 31679KAB6FTAT-142-A2A0.45 04/17/2017---37,707.3301/15/2016 01/15/2016 Principal Paydown-49,014.59 31679KAB6FTAT-142-A2A0.45 04/17/2017---49,014.59Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201622AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES730 Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount01/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 31679KAB6FTAT-142-A2A0.45 04/17/2017---32.5203/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 31680GAB2FTAT-151-A2A1.02 05/15/2018---425.0001/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 31680GAB2FTAT-151-A2A1.02 05/15/2018---425.0002/15/2016 02/15/2016 Coupon0.00 31680GAB2FTAT-151-A2A1.02 05/15/2018---425.0001/08/2016 01/08/2016 Maturity-750,000.00 36962G6Q2GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORP0.918 01/08/2016100.00750,000.0001/08/2016 01/08/2016 Coupon0.00 36962G6Q2GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORP0.918 01/08/2016---1,759.5003/15/2016 03/15/2016 Principal Paydown-12,203.47 41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018---12,203.4703/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018---17.2202/15/2016 02/15/2016 Principal Paydown-11,058.31 41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018---11,058.3102/15/2016 02/15/2016 Coupon0.00 41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018---21.7401/15/2016 01/15/2016 Principal Paydown-12,561.40 41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018---12,561.4001/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 41284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A0.49 04/15/2018---26.8703/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019---181.6303/15/2016 03/15/2016 Principal Paydown-24,505.12 41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019---24,505.1202/15/2016 02/15/2016 Coupon0.00 41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019---195.9002/15/2016 02/15/2016 Principal Paydown-21,398.57 41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019---21,398.5701/15/2016 01/15/2016 Principal Paydown-25,559.26 41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019---25,559.2601/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A0.80 01/15/2019---212.9402/01/2016 02/01/2016 Coupon0.00 4197915E4HAWAII ST0.731 08/01/2016---2,741.2503/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 437076BJ0HOME DEPOT INC1.004 09/15/2017---1,672.1302/15/2016 02/15/2016 Coupon0.00 43814KAB7HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017---128.3402/15/2016 02/15/2016 Principal Paydown-27,984.92 43814KAB7HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017---27,984.9203/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 43814KAB7HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017---112.0103/15/2016 03/15/2016 Principal Paydown-32,557.23 43814KAB7HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017---32,557.2301/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 43814KAB7HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017---147.5601/15/2016 01/15/2016 Principal Paydown-32,960.70 43814KAB7HONDO-151-A20.70 06/15/2017---32,960.7003/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 4581X0BV9INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK1.125 03/15/2017---9,000.0002/08/2016 02/11/2016 Buy600,000.00 4581X0BV9INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK1.125 03/15/2017100.368-604,945.5003/01/2016 03/04/2016 Buy1,000,000.00 4581X0BV9INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK1.125 03/15/2017100.303-1,008,311.2502/15/2016 02/15/2016 Maturity-771,000.00 459056HY6INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOP0.00 02/15/2016100.00771,000.0002/15/2016 02/15/2016 Maturity-163,000.00 459056HY6INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOP0.00 02/15/2016100.00163,000.0002/02/2016 02/05/2016 Buy750,000.00 459058DM2INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOP0.50 05/16/201699.997-750,800.4201/19/2016 01/19/2016 Coupon0.00 45905U7F5INTERNATIONAL BK FOR RECON & DEVMEDIUM TERM BK N0.45 07/19/2016---2,540.0001/20/2016 01/21/2016 Buy600,000.00 45905UQG2INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOP0.625 09/26/201699.955-600,927.9203/26/2016 03/26/2016 Coupon0.00 45905UQG2INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTIONAND DEVELOP0.625 09/26/2016---1,878.0002/15/2016 02/15/2016 Coupon0.00 46623EJY6JPMORGAN CHASE & CO1.35 02/15/2017---3,375.0001/20/2016 01/25/2016 Buy500,000.00 46623EJY6JPMORGAN CHASE & CO1.35 02/15/2017100.099-503,495.0001/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 46625HHW3JPMORGAN CHASE & CO2.60 01/15/2016---9,750.0001/15/2016 01/15/2016 Maturity-750,000.00 46625HHW3JPMORGAN CHASE & CO2.60 01/15/2016100.00750,000.0001/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 47787WAB5JDOT-15B-A20.98 06/15/2018---326.6702/15/2016 02/15/2016 Coupon0.00 47787WAB5JDOT-15B-A20.98 06/15/2018---326.6703/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 47787WAB5JDOT-15B-A20.98 06/15/2018---326.6701/01/2016 01/01/2016 Coupon0.00 5446462Q4LOS ANGELES CALIF UNI SCH DIST0.486 01/01/2016---972.0001/01/2016 01/01/2016 Maturity-400,000.00 5446462Q4LOS ANGELES CALIF UNI SCH DIST0.486 01/01/2016100.00400,000.0002/15/2016 02/15/2016 Coupon0.00 58772PAB4MBART-151-A2A0.82 06/15/2018---444.1701/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 58772PAB4MBART-151-A2A0.82 06/15/2018---444.17Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201623AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES731 Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount03/15/2016 03/15/2016 Principal Paydown-48,580.44 58772PAB4MBART-151-A2A0.82 06/15/2018---48,580.4403/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 58772PAB4MBART-151-A2A0.82 06/15/2018---444.1702/03/2016 02/08/2016 Buy500,000.00 637432HT5NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOP FINANCECORP5.45 04/10/2017105.07-534,281.9402/15/2016 02/15/2016 Coupon0.00 65477WAB2NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017---163.9102/15/2016 02/15/2016 Principal Paydown-66,720.53 65477WAB2NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017---66,720.5303/15/2016 03/15/2016 Principal Paydown-67,654.27 65477WAB2NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017---67,654.2703/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 65477WAB2NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017---130.5501/15/2016 01/15/2016 Principal Paydown-68,676.29 65477WAB2NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017---68,676.2901/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 65477WAB2NART-14B-A20.60 06/15/2017---198.2502/01/2016 02/01/2016 Maturity-300,000.00 68428LDH4ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG0.68 02/01/2016100.00300,000.0002/01/2016 02/01/2016 Maturity-490,000.00 68428LDH4ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG0.68 02/01/2016100.00490,000.0002/01/2016 02/01/2016 Coupon0.00 68428LDH4ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG0.68 02/01/2016---2,656.1601/08/2016 01/13/2016 Buy250,000.00 68428LDM3ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG0.938 11/01/2016100.00-250,000.0001/28/2016 01/28/2016 Maturity-750,000.00 69349LAH1PNC BANK,NA0.80 01/28/2016100.00750,000.0001/28/2016 01/28/2016 Coupon0.00 69349LAH1PNC BANK,NA0.80 01/28/2016---3,000.0001/28/2016 02/02/2016 Buy750,000.00 69353RCG1PNC BANK NA1.125 01/27/2017100.00-750,117.1902/01/2016 02/01/2016 Coupon0.00 762494QV7RIALTO CALIF UNI SCH DIST1.258 02/01/2017---1,572.5003/01/2016 03/01/2016 Coupon0.00 76912TJC8RIVERSIDE CNTY CALIF PUB FING AUTH TAXALLOC REV1.00 09/01/2016---625.0003/07/2016 03/07/2016 Maturity-285,000.00 857477AH6STATE STREET CORP2.875 03/07/2016100.00285,000.0003/07/2016 03/07/2016 Maturity-300,000.00 857477AH6STATE STREET CORP2.875 03/07/2016100.00300,000.0003/07/2016 03/07/2016 Coupon0.00 857477AH6STATE STREET CORP2.875 03/07/2016---8,409.3803/28/2016 03/29/2016 Buy586,000.00 880591EA6TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY5.50 07/18/2017105.976-627,375.8303/01/2016 03/01/2016 Maturity-750,000.00 89116EC19Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.0.00 03/01/2016100.00750,000.0001/28/2016 01/28/2016 Coupon0.00 89233AHP7Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.601 02/19/2016---246.5002/19/2016 02/19/2016 Coupon0.00 89233AHP7Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.601 02/19/2016---183.5202/19/2016 02/19/2016 Maturity-500,000.00 89233AHP7Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.601 02/19/2016100.00500,000.0002/19/2016 02/22/2016 Buy500,000.00 89233GEJ1Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.00 05/18/201699.871-499,355.0002/15/2016 02/15/2016 Coupon0.00 89236WAB4TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017---257.4402/15/2016 02/15/2016 Principal Paydown-54,524.90 89236WAB4TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017---54,524.9001/15/2016 01/15/2016 Principal Paydown-60,751.76 89236WAB4TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017---60,751.7601/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 89236WAB4TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017---293.3803/15/2016 03/15/2016 Principal Paydown-56,561.02 89236WAB4TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017---56,561.0203/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 89236WAB4TART-15A-A20.71 07/17/2017---225.1801/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 90290XAB3USAOT-151-A20.82 03/15/2018---328.0003/15/2016 03/15/2016 Principal Paydown-10,971.59 90290XAB3USAOT-151-A20.82 03/15/2018---10,971.5903/15/2016 03/15/2016 Coupon0.00 90290XAB3USAOT-151-A20.82 03/15/2018---328.0002/15/2016 02/15/2016 Coupon0.00 90290XAB3USAOT-151-A20.82 03/15/2018---328.0001/26/2016 01/26/2016 Coupon0.00 90331HMR1US BANK NA0.919 01/26/2018---1,188.1402/29/2016 02/29/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00 912828B82UNITED STATES TREASURY0.25 02/29/2016100.001,000,000.0002/29/2016 02/29/2016 Coupon0.00 912828B82UNITED STATES TREASURY0.25 02/29/2016---1,250.0001/31/2016 01/31/2016 Coupon0.00 912828PS3UNITED STATES TREASURY2.00 01/31/2016---20,000.0001/31/2016 01/31/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00 912828PS3UNITED STATES TREASURY2.00 01/31/2016100.001,000,000.0001/31/2016 01/31/2016 Maturity-1,000,000.00 912828PS3UNITED STATES TREASURY2.00 01/31/2016100.001,000,000.0001/31/2016 01/31/2016 Coupon0.00 912828QX1UNITED STATES TREASURY1.50 07/31/2016---7,500.0002/29/2016 02/29/2016 Coupon0.00 912828RF9UNITED STATES TREASURY1.00 08/31/2016---10,000.0003/31/2016 03/31/2016 Coupon0.00 912828TS9UNITED STATES TREASURY0.625 09/30/2017---3,125.0001/15/2016 01/15/2016 Coupon0.00 912828VL1UNITED STATES TREASURY0.625 07/15/2016---3,125.0002/01/2016 02/01/2016 Coupon0.00 91412GEZ4UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS0.926 07/01/2017---216.42Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201624AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES732 Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount03/01/2016 03/01/2016 Coupon0.00 91412GEZ4UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS0.938 07/01/2017---223.7801/26/2016 01/29/2016 Buy300,000.00 91412GEZ4UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS0.927 07/01/2017100.00-300,193.3302/23/2016 02/23/2016 Coupon0.00 928668AD4VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA FINANCELLC0.838 05/23/2016---765.0003/07/2016 03/07/2016 Buy593,977.73 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-593,977.7303/07/2016 03/07/2016 Buy4,500.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-4,500.0003/11/2016 03/11/2016 Buy0.05 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-0.0503/10/2016 03/10/2016 Buy1,010,000.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-1,010,000.0003/09/2016 03/09/2016 Buy451.66 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-451.6603/16/2016 03/16/2016 Buy3,375.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-3,375.0003/16/2016 03/16/2016 Sell-3,375.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.003,375.0003/15/2016 03/15/2016 Buy190,828.35 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-190,828.3503/15/2016 03/15/2016 Buy49,024.60 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-49,024.6003/15/2016 03/15/2016 Buy43,968.83 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-43,968.8303/14/2016 03/14/2016 Sell-1,007,691.25 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.001,007,691.2503/22/2016 03/22/2016 Buy511.09 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-511.0903/21/2016 03/21/2016 Buy1,932.80 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-1,932.8003/21/2016 03/21/2016 Sell-1,006,333.73 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.001,006,333.7303/28/2016 03/28/2016 Buy5,625.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-5,625.0003/31/2016 03/31/2016 Sell-1,003,046.11 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.001,003,046.1103/30/2016 03/30/2016 Buy1,878.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-1,878.0003/30/2016 03/30/2016 Sell-1,875.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.001,875.0003/29/2016 03/29/2016 Sell-627,375.83 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00627,375.8301/04/2016 01/04/2016 Buy401,197.38 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00-401,197.3801/08/2016 01/08/2016 Buy750,000.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00-750,000.0001/08/2016 01/08/2016 Buy1,759.50 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00-1,759.5001/12/2016 01/12/2016 Sell-249,043.79 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00249,043.7901/15/2016 01/15/2016 Buy3,125.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00-3,125.0001/15/2016 01/15/2016 Buy951,080.26 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00-951,080.2601/14/2016 01/14/2016 Sell-755,279.61 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00755,279.6101/13/2016 01/13/2016 Sell-250,000.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00250,000.0001/20/2016 01/20/2016 Sell-1,728.09 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.001,728.0901/20/2016 01/20/2016 Sell-2,537.50 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.002,537.5001/19/2016 01/19/2016 Buy63,909.31 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00-63,909.3101/22/2016 01/22/2016 Buy1,243.06 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00-1,243.0601/22/2016 01/22/2016 Buy1,000,000.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00-1,000,000.0001/21/2016 01/21/2016 Buy400,522.08 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00-400,522.0801/28/2016 01/28/2016 Buy761,625.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00-761,625.0001/28/2016 01/28/2016 Buy246.50 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00-246.5001/26/2016 01/26/2016 Sell-14.73 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.0014.7301/26/2016 01/26/2016 Buy1,188.14 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00-1,188.1401/25/2016 01/25/2016 Sell-503,495.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.00503,495.0002/01/2016 02/01/2016 Buy2,656.16 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-2,656.1602/01/2016 02/01/2016 Buy2,830,625.96 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-2,830,625.9601/31/2016 01/31/2016 Money Market Funds0.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/2016---651.9301/29/2016 01/29/2016 Sell-1,000,133.64 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.32 03/31/20161.001,000,133.6402/05/2016 02/05/2016 Buy14.73 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-14.7302/05/2016 02/05/2016 Buy249,199.58 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-249,199.5802/02/2016 02/02/2016 Sell-750,117.19 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00750,117.1902/08/2016 02/08/2016 Sell-534,281.94 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00534,281.94Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201625AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES733 Summary * Grouped By: Status. * Groups Sorted By: Status. * Showing transactions with Entry Date within selected date range. * MMF transactions are expanded. * The Transaction Detail/Trading Activity reports provide our most up-to-date transactional details. As such, these reports are subject to change even after the other reports on the website have been locked down. While these reports can be useful tools in understanding recent activity,due to their dynamic nature we do not recommend using them for booking journal entries or reconciliation.Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount02/11/2016 02/11/2016 Sell-604,945.50 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00604,945.5002/10/2016 02/10/2016 Sell-0.11 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.000.1102/17/2016 02/17/2016 Sell-598,194.69 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00598,194.6902/16/2016 02/16/2016 Buy578,446.84 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-578,446.8402/16/2016 02/16/2016 Buy788,507.93 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-788,507.9302/16/2016 02/16/2016 Buy14.14 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-14.1402/19/2016 02/19/2016 Buy183.52 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-183.5202/19/2016 02/19/2016 Buy500,000.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-500,000.0002/25/2016 02/25/2016 Buy2,350.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-2,350.0002/23/2016 02/23/2016 Sell-700,412.22 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00700,412.2202/23/2016 02/23/2016 Buy765.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-765.0002/22/2016 02/22/2016 Sell-503,534.36 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00503,534.3602/29/2016 02/29/2016 Buy1,000,000.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-1,000,000.0002/29/2016 02/29/2016 Buy1,250.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-1,250.0002/29/2016 02/29/2016 Money Market Funds0.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/2016---1,316.2602/29/2016 02/29/2016 Buy10,000.00 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.35 03/31/20161.00-10,000.0003/04/2016 03/04/2016 Sell-1,008,311.25 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.001,008,311.2503/03/2016 03/03/2016 Sell-1,568,974.17 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.001,568,974.1703/01/2016 03/01/2016 Buy754,265.04 949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.34 03/31/20161.00-754,265.0401/20/2016 01/20/2016 Management Fee0.00 CCYUSDUS Dollar0.00 03/31/2016----4,268.0902/22/2016 02/22/2016 Management Fee0.00 CCYUSDUS Dollar0.00 03/31/2016----4,179.3603/21/2016 03/21/2016 Management Fee0.00 CCYUSDUS Dollar0.00 03/31/2016----4,158.87----------5,404.17 --------- -------225.44Entry Date Settle Date Transaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierDescriptionCouponRateFinal MaturityPriceBase Amount----------5,404.17 --------- ------977.36Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201626AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES734 * Does not Lock Down.ReceivableSettledEntry DateSettle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierTicker DescriptionBase Amount03/31/201603/31/2016Money Market Funds0.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,202.8003/31/201603/31/2016Money Market Funds0.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,202.80Entry DateSettle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierTicker DescriptionBase Amount03/07/201603/07/2016Buy593,977.73 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-593,977.7303/07/201603/07/2016Buy4,500.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-4,500.0003/11/201603/11/2016Buy0.05 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-0.0503/10/201603/10/2016Buy1,010,000.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-1,010,000.0003/09/201603/09/2016Buy451.66 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-451.6603/16/201603/16/2016Buy3,375.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-3,375.0003/16/201603/16/2016Sell-3,375.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I3,375.0003/15/201603/15/2016Buy190,828.35 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-190,828.3503/15/201603/15/2016Buy49,024.60 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-49,024.6003/15/201603/15/2016Buy43,968.83 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-43,968.8303/14/201603/14/2016Sell-1,007,691.25 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,007,691.2503/22/201603/22/2016Buy511.09 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-511.0903/21/201603/21/2016Buy1,932.80 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-1,932.8003/21/201603/21/2016Sell-1,006,333.73 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,006,333.7303/28/201603/28/2016Buy5,625.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-5,625.0003/31/201603/31/2016Sell-1,003,046.11 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,003,046.1103/30/201603/30/2016Buy1,878.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-1,878.0003/30/201603/30/2016Sell-1,875.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,875.0003/29/201603/29/2016Sell-627,375.83 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I627,375.8301/04/201601/04/2016Buy401,197.38 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-401,197.3801/08/201601/08/2016Buy750,000.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-750,000.0001/08/201601/08/2016Buy1,759.50 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-1,759.5001/12/201601/12/2016Sell-249,043.79 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I249,043.7901/15/201601/15/2016Buy3,125.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-3,125.0001/15/201601/15/2016Buy951,080.26 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-951,080.2601/14/201601/14/2016Sell-755,279.61 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I755,279.6101/13/201601/13/2016Sell-250,000.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I250,000.0001/20/201601/20/2016Sell-1,728.09 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,728.0901/20/201601/20/2016Sell-2,537.50 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I2,537.5001/19/201601/19/2016Buy63,909.31 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-63,909.3101/22/201601/22/2016Buy1,243.06 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-1,243.0601/22/201601/22/2016Buy1,000,000.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-1,000,000.0001/21/201601/21/2016Buy400,522.08 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-400,522.0801/28/201601/28/2016Buy761,625.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-761,625.0001/28/201601/28/2016Buy246.50 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-246.5001/26/201601/26/2016Sell-14.73 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I14.7301/26/201601/26/2016Buy1,188.14 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-1,188.1401/25/201601/25/2016Sell-503,495.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I503,495.0002/01/201602/01/2016Buy2,656.16 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-2,656.1602/01/201602/01/2016Buy2,830,625.96 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-2,830,625.9601/31/201601/31/2016Money Market Funds0.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I651.9301/29/201601/29/2016Sell-1,000,133.64 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,000,133.64MMF Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201627AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES735 Summary * Grouped By: Status. * Groups Sorted By: Status. * Filtered By: Security Type = "MMFUND". * Showing transactions with Entry Date within selected date range. * MMF transactions are expanded. * The Transaction Detail/Trading Activity reports provide our most up-to-date transactional details. As such, these reports are subject to change even after the other reports on the website have been locked down. While these reports can be useful tools in understanding recent activity,due to their dynamic nature we do not recommend using them for booking journal entries or reconciliation.Entry DateSettle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierTicker DescriptionBase Amount02/05/201602/05/2016Buy14.73 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-14.7302/05/201602/05/2016Buy249,199.58 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-249,199.5802/02/201602/02/2016Sell-750,117.19 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I750,117.1902/08/201602/08/2016Sell-534,281.94 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I534,281.9402/11/201602/11/2016Sell-604,945.50 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I604,945.5002/10/201602/10/2016Sell-0.11 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I0.1102/17/201602/17/2016Sell-598,194.69 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I598,194.6902/16/201602/16/2016Buy578,446.84 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-578,446.8402/16/201602/16/2016Buy788,507.93 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-788,507.9302/16/201602/16/2016Buy14.14 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-14.1402/19/201602/19/2016Buy183.52 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-183.5202/19/201602/19/2016Buy500,000.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-500,000.0002/25/201602/25/2016Buy2,350.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-2,350.0002/23/201602/23/2016Sell-700,412.22 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I700,412.2202/23/201602/23/2016Buy765.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-765.0002/22/201602/22/2016Sell-503,534.36 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I503,534.3602/29/201602/29/2016Buy1,000,000.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-1,000,000.0002/29/201602/29/2016Buy1,250.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-1,250.0002/29/201602/29/2016Money Market Funds0.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,316.2602/29/201602/29/2016Buy10,000.00 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-10,000.0003/04/201603/04/2016Sell-1,008,311.25 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,008,311.2503/03/201603/03/2016Sell-1,568,974.17 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,568,974.1703/01/201603/01/2016Buy754,265.04 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-754,265.04---------279,547.53 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-277,579.34Entry DateSettle DateTransaction TypeBase Current Units IdentifierTicker DescriptionBase Amount---------279,547.53 949917397SHIXX WellsFargo:Htge MM;I-276,376.54MMF Transaction DetailWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201628AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES736 Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/AccretionChange In AccruedBalanceNet RealizedGain/LossBase Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/ReceivablesEnding Market Value +Accrued41284BAB2HARLY-151-A2A318,989.820.000.000.00-71,462.950.000.52-25.41-0.00283.380.00247,785.3690290XAB3USAOT-151-A2479,435.450.000.000.00-10,971.590.003.43-4.00-0.00488.880.00468,952.1665477WAB2NART-14B-A2396,323.850.000.000.00-203,051.090.005.75-54.15-0.00173.090.00193,397.4431679KAB6FTAT-142-A2A86,700.730.000.000.00-86,721.920.000.71-17.34-0.0037.830.000.00949917397WellsFargo:Htge MM;I1,399,428.3212,960,248.24-12,680,700.710.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.001,678,975.85912828B82UNITED STATES TREASURY1,000,766.780.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00304.70-844.780.00-226.700.000.00459058DM2INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP0.00749,977.500.000.000.000.0012.481,406.250.00599.520.00751,995.75459058DM2INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP1,000,802.000.000.000.000.000.0016.551,250.000.00592.450.001,002,661.003130A4KE1FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS500,214.500.000.000.000.000.0019.10412.500.00178.900.00500,825.0036962G6Q2GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORP751,637.630.000.00-750,000.000.000.00-32.11-1,625.630.0020.110.000.00605581FW2MISSISSIPPI ST300,261.000.000.000.000.000.000.00480.000.00666.000.00301,407.0046623EJY6JPMORGAN CHASE & CO0.00500,495.000.000.000.000.00-85.70862.500.00690.700.00501,962.5090331HMR1US BANK NA448,324.520.000.000.000.000.00-114.44239.090.00349.340.00448,798.5190331HMR1US BANK NA298,883.010.000.000.000.000.000.00159.390.00156.600.00299,199.01857477AH6STATE STREET CORP288,598.740.000.00-285,000.000.000.00-1,158.16-2,594.690.00154.100.000.00857477AH6STATE STREET CORP303,788.150.000.00-300,000.000.000.00-1,259.17-2,731.250.00202.270.000.0006050TLU4BANK OF AMERICA NA499,731.800.000.000.000.000.000.00148.820.00833.500.00500,714.13084664CD1BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCE CORP749,322.080.000.000.000.000.000.00500.830.001,677.000.00751,499.9205531FAG8BB&T CORP759,117.920.00-750,000.000.000.000.00-2,375.70-7,066.670.00324.450.000.003137EADF3FREDDIE MAC0.001,005,120.000.000.000.000.00-341.334,826.390.001,368.330.001,010,973.393133EFBT3FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORP1,000,334.000.000.000.000.000.0049.73-1,050.000.00564.270.00999,898.00880591EA6TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY0.00621,019.360.000.000.000.00-220.716,535.530.00629.150.00627,963.33161571GJ7CHAIT 2014-A1 A1774,796.880.000.000.000.000.00-249.970.000.002,176.620.00776,723.5303255LGX1ANAHEIM CALIF PUB FING AUTH LEASEREV751,460.000.000.000.000.000.000.001,875.000.0037.500.00753,372.50912828QX1UNITED STATES TREASURY1,011,316.170.000.000.000.000.00-2,644.96-3,763.440.001,354.960.001,006,262.744197915E4HAWAII ST752,629.380.000.000.000.000.000.00-1,370.630.00772.500.00752,031.2569353RCG1PNC BANK NA0.00750,000.000.000.000.000.000.001,500.000.00808.500.00752,308.50912828SY7UNITED STATES TREASURY498,066.220.000.000.000.000.00130.28776.980.001,783.720.00500,757.20Roll ForwardWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201629AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES737 Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/AccretionChange In AccruedBalanceNet RealizedGain/LossBase Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/ReceivablesEnding Market Value +Accrued166764AL4CHEVRON CORP0.00698,005.000.000.000.000.00191.593,556.780.006,020.210.00707,773.5889233AHP7Toyota Motor Credit Corporation499,948.740.000.00-500,000.000.000.000.00-30.240.0081.500.000.003130A3J70FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS998,700.720.000.000.000.000.00-349.241,562.500.002,778.240.001,002,692.22097023BC8BOEING CO770,910.630.000.000.000.000.00-5,363.387,031.250.00690.880.00773,269.3889116EC19Toronto Dominion Holdings (U.S.A.), Inc.749,435.750.000.00-750,000.000.000.00475.000.000.0089.250.000.00928668AD4VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICAFINANCE LLC496,780.200.000.000.000.000.000.00118.680.002,385.000.00499,283.88912828VL1UNITED STATES TREASURY1,002,965.230.000.000.000.000.00-667.59-1,565.110.001,370.590.001,002,103.124581X0BV9INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK0.001,003,030.000.000.000.000.00-225.64500.000.00-1.360.001,003,303.004581X0BV9INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK0.00602,208.000.000.000.000.00-277.39300.000.00-248.810.00601,981.803137EACW7FREDDIE MAC238,536.280.000.000.000.000.00-681.96-1,175.000.00183.530.00236,862.85CCYUSDReceivable225.380.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00979.091,204.47CCYUSDCash-9.650.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.007.68-1.97CCYUSDPayable0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.003130A2T97FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS999,536.670.000.000.000.000.00-281.60-1,250.000.001,982.600.00999,987.673130A2T97FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS499,768.330.000.000.000.000.00-103.75-625.000.00954.250.00499,993.8305581RAC0BMWLT-161-A2B0.00600,000.000.000.000.000.000.00170.880.0053.820.00600,224.7076912TJC8RIVERSIDE CNTY CALIF PUB FING AUTHTAX ALLOC REV125,325.420.000.000.000.000.0092.08-312.500.00-89.580.00125,015.4207330NAH8BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO0.00697,690.000.000.000.000.00216.743,461.110.001,475.860.00702,843.71912828RF9UNITED STATES TREASURY1,005,410.120.000.000.000.000.00-1,405.96-2,509.560.001,835.960.001,003,330.57912828RF9UNITED STATES TREASURY1,005,410.120.000.000.000.000.00-1,041.02-2,509.560.001,471.020.001,003,330.57912828WQ9UNITED STATES TREASURY999,779.740.000.000.000.000.00-102.261,250.000.00804.260.001,001,731.7417305EFE0CCCIT-13A6-A60.00751,787.110.000.000.000.00-588.16660.000.00184.650.00752,043.6046625HHW3JPMORGAN CHASE & CO759,305.170.000.00-750,000.000.000.00-497.21-8,991.670.00183.710.000.003136FPET0FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATION1,009,481.670.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00-3,146.40-6,166.670.00-168.600.000.00313384SS9FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS999,778.000.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00243.060.000.00-21.060.000.0091412GEZ4UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS0.00300,000.000.000.000.000.000.00242.320.00-93.000.00300,149.32459056HY6INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP770,867.390.000.00-771,000.000.000.00424.450.000.00-291.840.000.00Roll ForwardWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201630AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES738 Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/AccretionChange In AccruedBalanceNet RealizedGain/LossBase Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/ReceivablesEnding Market Value +Accrued459056HY6INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP162,971.960.000.00-163,000.000.000.00101.230.000.00-73.190.000.0045905U7F5INTERNATIONAL BK FOR RECON & DEVMEDIUM TERM BK N995,012.500.000.000.000.000.000.00-1,412.500.006,420.000.001,000,020.003133EDQW5FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORP1,001,299.890.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.0049.07-1,288.890.00-60.070.000.0069349LAH1PNC BANK,NA752,537.250.000.00-750,000.000.000.000.00-2,550.000.0012.750.000.0030231GAS1EXXON MOBIL CORP0.00560,000.000.000.000.000.000.00555.590.001,695.120.00562,250.7117275RAY8CISCO SYSTEMS INC748,716.880.000.000.000.000.000.0043.160.00-172.500.00748,587.5306406HBX6BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP763,680.750.000.000.000.000.00-3,079.87-4,312.500.00607.870.00756,896.25313384ZK8FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS498,445.500.000.000.000.000.00770.970.000.00258.530.00499,475.003130A3XU3FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,001,155.220.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.007.58-1,097.220.00-65.580.000.003137EADT3FREDDIE MAC0.001,001,470.000.000.000.000.00-47.84947.920.00531.840.001,002,901.92637432HT5NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPFINANCE CORP0.00525,350.000.000.000.000.00-3,146.4912,943.750.00-176.510.00534,970.75762494QV7RIALTO CALIF UNI SCH DIST250,975.420.000.000.000.000.000.00-786.250.001,497.500.00251,686.6768428LDH4ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG300,883.670.000.00-300,000.000.000.000.00-838.670.00-45.000.000.0068428LDH4ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG491,443.320.000.00-490,000.000.000.000.00-1,369.820.00-73.500.000.00313379FW4FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS0.001,003,060.000.000.000.000.00-7.033,111.110.00692.030.001,006,856.11912828TS9UNITED STATES TREASURY994,674.110.000.000.000.000.0015.13-1,571.040.005,609.870.00998,728.0806050TMB5BANK OF AMERICA NA249,321.100.000.000.000.000.000.0031.880.00498.750.00249,851.7209247XAC5BLACKROCK INC0.00539,065.000.000.000.000.00-3,046.661,388.890.00839.160.00538,246.395446462Q4LOS ANGELES CALIF UNI SCH DIST400,972.000.000.00-400,000.000.000.000.00-972.000.000.000.000.00313373SZ6FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKS1,007,691.580.000.000.000.000.00-4,018.145,312.500.00780.140.001,009,766.0831680GAB2FTAT-151-A2A499,024.320.000.000.000.000.002.350.000.001,105.950.00500,132.623135G0JA2FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATION0.001,003,410.000.000.000.000.00-150.074,812.500.001,425.070.001,009,497.5091412GUT0UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS250,295.030.000.000.000.000.000.00396.250.0040.000.00250,731.2847787WAB5JDOT-15B-A2399,252.580.000.000.000.000.002.090.000.00702.550.00399,957.2245905UQG2INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOP0.00599,730.000.000.000.000.0076.9952.080.001,099.610.00600,958.6802665WAY7AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP499,611.920.000.000.000.000.000.008.980.001,490.500.00501,111.4002665WAY7AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP0.00250,057.500.000.000.000.00-7.4689.450.00416.210.00250,555.70Roll ForwardWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201631AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES739 * Weighted By: Ending Base Market Value + Accrued.Identifier,DescriptionBeginning MarketValue + Accrued,Base PurchasesBase Sales,Base Maturities andRedemptionsBase Paydowns Base Net TransferredValueBase Amortization/AccretionChange In AccruedBalanceNet RealizedGain/LossBase Change InNet UnrealizedGain/LossBase Change In Cash,Payables/ReceivablesEnding Market Value +Accrued191216BR0COCA-COLA CO299,348.870.000.000.000.000.0016.43656.250.001,629.070.00301,650.62437076BJ0HOME DEPOT INC751,417.130.000.000.000.000.000.0043.160.001,520.250.00752,980.53912828PS3UNITED STATES TREASURY1,009,589.570.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00-1,376.79-8,369.570.00156.790.000.00912828PS3UNITED STATES TREASURY1,009,589.570.000.00-1,000,000.000.000.00-1,364.23-8,369.570.00144.230.000.0014912L4X6CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESCORP786,365.120.000.000.000.000.00-2,697.91-3,971.880.001,463.340.00781,158.67544587B72LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORPLEASE REV491,558.200.000.000.000.000.000.001,543.500.0098.000.00493,199.7089233GEJ1Toyota Motor Credit Corporation0.00499,355.000.000.000.000.00292.500.000.0027.840.00499,675.3468428LDM3ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG0.00250,000.000.000.000.000.000.00508.080.00417.500.00250,925.5889236WAB4TART-15A-A2495,594.070.000.000.00-171,837.680.001.10-54.220.00274.640.00323,977.9158772PAB4MBART-151-A2A648,745.530.000.000.00-48,580.440.00222.54-17.700.00831.410.00601,201.3341284AAB4HARLY-141-A2A65,757.060.000.000.00-35,823.180.000.60-7.800.0046.090.0029,972.7743814KAB7HONDO-151-A2252,797.770.000.000.00-93,502.850.003.30-29.090.01197.980.00159,467.12------44,381,812.7127,471,077.71-13,430,700.71-13,209,000.00-721,951.700.00 -38,408.28 -11,030.130.0070,192.30986.77 44,512,978.68Roll ForwardWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD 01/01/2016 - 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201632AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES740 Identifier DescriptionSecurity Type Base Market Value BookYieldYield Duration -200 Basis PointShock-100 Basis PointShock-50 Basis PointShock50 Basis PointShock100 Basis PointShock200 Basis PointShock02665WAY7 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORP CORP751,398.75 1.087 1.367 0.216753,617.56753,021.85752,210.28750,587.26749,775.80748,153.0103255LGX1 ANAHEIM CALIF PUB FING AUTH LEASEREVMUNI750,247.50 1.00 0.777 0.084750,737.19750,737.19750,562.61749,932.41749,617.33748,987.2305581RAC0 BMWLT-161-A2BABS600,053.82 0.947 1.255 0.051600,437.88600,359.85600,206.83599,900.81599,747.79599,441.7706050TLU4 BANK OF AMERICA NACORP500,034.00 1.109 1.659 0.112500,963.17500,594.06500,314.03499,753.99499,473.99498,914.0206050TMB5 BANK OF AMERICA NACORP249,663.25 1.102 1.747 0.174250,422.21250,097.68249,880.46249,446.05249,228.85248,794.4706406HBX6 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP CORP753,877.50 0.644 0.703 0.324755,594.68755,594.68755,098.81752,656.25751,435.05748,992.8307330NAH8 BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO CORP699,382.60 1.30 1.088 0.982706,853.76706,249.56702,816.32695,948.39692,513.68685,642.81084664CD1 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FINANCECORPCORP749,964.75 0.936 1.211 0.025750,191.80750,152.24750,058.50749,871.00749,777.26749,589.7709247XAC5 BLACKROCK INCCORP536,857.50 1.242 1.129 1.404545,368.24544,395.70540,626.42533,088.94529,320.75521,785.44097023BC8 BOEING COCORP763,035.00 0.849 0.996 0.624767,777.56767,777.56765,415.74760,654.40758,273.93753,513.3914912L4X6 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESCORPCORP778,510.75 0.643 0.686 0.335780,299.90780,299.90779,814.78777,206.77775,902.86773,295.19161571GJ7 CHAIT 2014-A1 A1ABS776,327.42 1.022 0.93 0.784781,988.11781,988.11779,370.72773,284.31770,241.40764,156.16166764AL4 CHEVRON CORPCORP704,216.80 1.506 0.97 1.595715,113.22715,113.22709,833.23698,600.97692,985.74681,757.0717275RAY8 CISCO SYSTEMS INCCORP748,253.25 0.958 1.267 0.199750,139.90749,742.31748,997.77747,508.75746,764.26745,275.3517305EFE0 CCCIT-13A6-A6ABS751,383.60 0.949 0.886 0.434754,272.97754,272.97753,014.14749,753.14748,122.75744,862.19191216BR0 COCA-COLA COCORP300,527.70 0.897 0.762 1.553304,084.38304,084.38302,861.42298,194.22295,860.99291,195.2330231GAS1 EXXON MOBIL CORPCORP561,695.12 1.248 1.321 0.152562,823.01562,548.92562,122.02561,268.24560,841.37559,987.683130A2T97 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND1,499,919.00 0.396 0.511 0.49 1,503,674.75 1,503,674.75 1,503,593.90 1,496,244.29 1,492,569.77 1,485,221.293130A3J70 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND1,000,470.00 0.484 0.552 0.641 1,004,010.09 1,004,010.09 1,003,676.59997,263.58994,057.34987,645.383130A4KE1 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND500,000.00 0.345 0.00 0.003500,000.00500,000.00500,000.00499,992.50499,985.00499,970.00313373SZ6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND1,003,214.00 0.50 0.444 0.191 1,004,064.78 1,004,064.78 1,004,064.78 1,002,255.94 1,001,297.91999,381.92313379FW4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY BOND1,003,745.00 0.741 0.683 1.177 1,011,814.48 1,011,814.48 1,009,652.29997,838.21991,931.92980,120.86313384ZK8 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANKSAGCY DISC499,475.00 0.622 0.357 0.288499,988.55499,988.55499,988.55498,755.77498,036.56496,598.223133EFBT3 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKSFUNDING CORPAGCY BOND999,548.00 0.44 0.529 0.418 1,001,758.28 1,001,758.28 1,001,637.11997,458.99995,370.09991,192.583135G0JA2 FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGEASSOCIATIONAGCY BOND1,004,685.00 0.818 0.686 1.06 1,011,991.07 1,011,991.07 1,010,010.04999,360.38994,036.19983,389.093137EACW7 FREDDIE MACAGCY BOND236,392.85 0.827 0.514 0.399236,877.67236,877.67236,864.46235,921.25235,449.68234,506.623137EADF3 FREDDIE MACAGCY BOND1,006,147.00 0.817 0.695 1.101 1,013,846.42 1,013,846.42 1,011,686.07 1,000,608.39995,070.23983,995.273137EADT3 FREDDIE MACAGCY BOND1,001,954.00 0.714 0.655 0.887 1,007,775.46 1,007,775.46 1,006,397.82997,510.48993,067.27984,181.7431680GAB2 FTAT-151-A2AABS499,905.95 1.023 1.051 0.55502,795.82502,655.58501,280.73498,531.25497,156.62494,407.5841284AAB4 HARLY-141-A2AABS29,966.25 0.491 0.921 0.09929,993.5729,993.5729,981.0829,951.4129,936.5829,906.9241284BAB2 HARLY-151-A2AABS247,697.20 0.80 1.015 0.449248,826.11248,809.43248,253.30247,141.14246,585.10245,473.134197915E4 HAWAII STMUNI751,117.50 0.731 0.311 0.339751,909.41751,909.41751,909.41749,844.38748,571.32746,025.37437076BJ0 HOME DEPOT INCCORP752,625.00 1.02 1.184 0.204754,442.91754,160.39753,392.69751,857.33751,089.68749,554.4443814KAB7 HONDO-151-A2ABS159,417.51 0.705 0.831 0.203159,686.45159,686.45159,579.33159,255.71159,093.91158,770.344581X0BV9 INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENTBANKSOVEREIGNGOV1,604,484.80 0.813 0.83 0.949 1,617,123.62 1,617,123.62 1,612,098.36 1,596,871.80 1,589,259.36 1,574,036.17459058DM2 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPSOVEREIGNGOV1,751,375.50 0.508 -0.128 0.125 1,751,375.50 1,751,375.50 1,751,375.50 1,750,280.91 1,749,186.37 1,746,997.4145905U7F5 INTERNATIONAL BK FOR RECON & DEVMEDIUM TERM BK NSOVEREIGNGOV999,120.00 0.45 0.743 0.299 1,001,339.67 1,001,339.67 1,000,613.71997,626.34996,132.73993,145.6645905UQG2 INTERNATIONAL BANK FORRECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPSOVEREIGNGOV600,906.60 0.691 0.314 0.485601,821.74601,821.74601,821.74599,449.44597,992.35595,078.4146623EJY6 JPMORGAN CHASE & COCORP501,100.00 1.255 1.095 0.864505,841.17505,429.80503,264.83498,935.32496,770.80492,442.1947787WAB5 JDOT-15B-A2ABS399,783.00 0.983 1.064 0.626402,445.99402,285.80401,034.36398,531.72397,280.52394,778.36544587B72 LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORPLEASE REVMUNI490,935.90 1.26 0.961 0.583493,686.57493,686.57492,367.01489,504.86488,073.89485,212.1858772PAB4 MBART-151-A2AABS600,982.15 1.04 0.962 0.499603,867.26603,867.26602,481.65599,482.75597,983.43594,985.07605581FW2 MISSISSIPPI STMUNI300,447.00 0.64 0.371 0.504301,008.80301,008.80301,008.80299,689.89298,932.82297,418.79Shock AnalysisWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201633AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES741 * Weighted By: Base Market Value + Accrued. *The shock analysis includes a yield floor of 0.Identifier DescriptionSecurity Type Base Market Value BookYieldYield Duration -200 Basis PointShock-100 Basis PointShock-50 Basis PointShock50 Basis PointShock100 Basis PointShock200 Basis PointShock637432HT5 NATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPFINANCE CORPCORP522,027.00 1.084 1.115 0.981527,737.50527,148.48524,587.64519,466.56516,906.31511,786.4065477WAB2 NART-14B-A2ABS193,345.86 0.602 1.011 0.114193,568.71193,566.28193,456.07193,235.66193,125.46192,905.0768428LDM3 ORANGE CNTY CALIF PENSION OBLIG MUNI250,417.50 0.938 0.681 0.588251,420.28251,420.28251,153.75249,681.29248,945.12247,472.8969353RCG1 PNC BANK NACORP750,808.50 1.125 0.978 0.791756,614.01756,614.01753,777.23747,838.34744,866.75738,919.30762494QV7 RIALTO CALIF UNI SCH DISTMUNI251,162.50 1.258 0.728 0.837252,693.00252,693.00252,213.65250,111.42249,060.41246,958.5976912TJC8 RIVERSIDE CNTY CALIF PUB FINGAUTH TAX ALLOC REVMUNI124,911.25 1.301 1.201 0.422125,544.36125,438.40125,174.82124,647.69124,384.15123,857.10880591EA6 TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY AGCY BOND621,427.80 0.876 0.805 1.254627,701.37627,701.37625,324.32617,531.62613,635.78605,845.1389233GEJ1 Toyota Motor Credit CorporationCP499,675.34 0.541 0.497 0.13499,998.18499,998.18499,998.18499,350.55499,025.78498,376.2889236WAB4 TART-15A-A2ABS323,875.67 0.71 0.901 0.22324,517.68324,517.68324,231.94323,519.41323,163.17322,450.7490290XAB3 USAOT-151-A2ABS468,781.23 0.825 0.956 0.374470,457.41470,457.41469,657.87467,904.63467,028.08465,275.1290331HMR1 US BANK NACORP746,733.75 0.872 1.441 0.058747,357.86747,166.86746,950.30746,517.20746,300.64745,867.54912828QX1 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1,003,749.00 0.434 0.379 0.33 1,005,004.41 1,005,004.41 1,005,004.41 1,002,092.85 1,000,436.78997,124.86912828RF9 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV2,004,922.00 0.505 0.407 0.413 2,008,292.16 2,008,292.16 2,008,292.16 2,000,781.94 1,996,642.07 1,988,362.95912828SY7 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV499,707.00 0.73 0.675 1.155503,603.06503,603.06502,592.93496,821.31493,935.86488,165.67912828TS9 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV998,711.00 0.631 0.711 1.487 1,009,270.70 1,009,270.70 1,006,136.79991,285.96983,861.67969,015.33912828VL1 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1,000,781.00 0.356 0.356 0.288 1,001,807.09 1,001,807.09 1,001,807.09999,339.90997,898.85995,016.90912828WQ9 UNITED STATES TREASURYUS GOV1,000,468.00 0.459 0.312 0.247 1,001,239.01 1,001,239.01 1,001,239.01999,232.45997,996.94995,526.0991412GEZ4 UNIVERSITY CALIF REVSMUNI299,907.00 0.95 0.56 0.00299,907.00299,907.00299,907.00299,907.00299,907.00299,907.0091412GUT0 UNIVERSITY CALIF REVSMUNI250,132.50 0.634 0.338 0.126250,239.03250,239.03250,239.03249,974.92249,817.35249,502.22928668AD4 VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICAFINANCE LLCCORP498,841.50 0.837 2.415 0.143500,268.29499,554.87499,198.18498,484.83498,128.18497,414.91949917397 WellsFargo:Htge MM;IMMFUND1,678,975.85 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,678,975.85 1,678,975.85 1,678,975.85 1,678,975.85 1,678,975.85 1,678,975.85CCYUSD ReceivableCASH1,204.47 0.00 0.00 0.001,204.471,204.471,204.471,204.471,204.471,204.47CCYUSD CashCASH-1.97 0.00 0.00 0.00-1.97-1.97-1.97-1.97-1.97-1.97---------44,411,407.26 0.744 0.726 0.521 44,590,071.11 44,583,802.93 44,522,358.87 44,295,723.81 44,180,045.96 43,948,707.05Shock AnalysisWC-Contra Costa County (19529)Base Currency: USD As of 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201634AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES742 The information contained in this report represents estimated trade date investment calculations provided via Clearwater Analytics for Wells Capital Management clients. Certain calculations may not be available for all timeperiods. Please refer to your custody statement for official portfolio holdings and transactions. Note that certain accounting methods may cause differences between this investment report and your custody statement.DisclaimerAs of 03/31/2016Return to Table of ContentsDated: 04/05/201635AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES743 STATEMENT FOR PERIOD March 01, 2016 - March 31, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Date Transaction Shares Price Per Share Amount 201-000004-10 Average Cost NAV Average Cost Amount Realized Gain/Loss* CalTrust Short Term Fund - CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 02/29/2016 BALANCE FORWARD 12,336,400.690 10.02 123,610,734.91 10.02430832 123,663,884.13 03/21/2016 PURCHASE 998,003.992 10.02 10,000,000.00 10.02398587 0.00 10,000,000.00 03/31/2016 UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) 0.000 0.00 0.00 03/31/2016 ENDING BALANCE 13,334,404.682 10.02 133,663,884.13 133,610,734.91 INCOME DISTRIBUTION PAID - FEBRUARY 66,445.24 73,556.39INCOME ACCRUAL - MARCH -53,149.22CUMULATIVE UNREALIZED GAIN (LOSS) * Please note that this information should not be construed as tax advice and it is recommended that you consult with a tax professional regarding your account. For Inquiries About Your Account, Contact: Nottingham Investment Administration 116 South Franklin Street Rocky Mount, NC 27804 Attention: CalTRUST Shareholder Services Phone: 800.773.3863 Fax: 252-972-1908 Email: caltrustsupport@ncfunds.com CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY ATTN: BELINDA ZHU 625 COURT STREET ROOM 102 MARTINEZ CA 94553-1281 Page 1 of 1AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 744 Caltrust Short Term Fund MONTH END PORTFOLIO STATISTICS March 31, 2016 CalTrust Short Term LAIF Market Value N/A$1,075,237,151.19 NAV per Share N/A$10.02 Yield 0.51%0.69% Period Total Return N/A0.11% Period Yield Return 0.04%0.06% Effective Duration N/A0.42 yrs. Average Maturity 0.42 yrs.1.09 yrs. CalTrust Short Term Total Return CalTrust Short Term Yield Return LAIF Yield Return 0.11%0.04%0.06%One Month 0.27%0.12%0.16%Three Month 0.26%0.21%0.29%Six Month 0.48%0.37%0.54%One Year* 0.42%0.31%0.47%Two Year* 0.43%0.29%0.43%Three Year* 0.45%0.32%0.44%Five Year* 1.63%1.55%1.60%Ten Year* 1.82%1.73%1.80%Since Inception* *Annualized Corporate 29.9% US Govt Agency 29.7% MBS/ABS 14.6% SupraNational 13.4% Muni 10.8% MONEYMKT 1.5% Total:100.0% Portfolio Sector Breakdown AAA 30.7% AA+27.7% A 15.5% AA-7.9% AA 6.9% A+4.1% A-3.5% A-1+3.4% SP-1+0.4% Total:100.0% Portfolio Quality Breakdown Disclosure to Performance Information This performance information is based on an inception date of February 13, 2005, when the CalTrust Short-Term portfolio commenced investment operations according to its investment objective , and does not include any investment returns from temporary investments held before the commencement of those operations. First-month index returns, February 13-28, 2005, are intra-period and were calculated by calculating the average daily return during the month and multiplying the average daily return by number of days in the shortened period. Performance was calculated net of investment advisory and program administration fees. The Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) is a diversified portfolio managed by the State of California for local governments and special districts. Performance for the CalTRUST Short Term Account is on a trade date basis. LAIF's monthly performance was calculated by taking the average monthly effective yield and dividing it by 365 then multiplying the result by the number of days in the month. Yield represents the 7-day net distribution on investments for the period. Rating source - Standard & Poor's. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 745 <<Back CalTrust Short Term Fund View Export Print Home Search Complete Listing Additional Ratings Effective Date: 3/31/2016 Go Ticker CUSIP Description S&P Rating 3/31/2016*Mat. Date Years Shares Price Value AX072916 0258M0DG1 AMERICAN EXPRESS CRE DIT 7/29/2016 1.3% A- 7/29/2016 0.3 959,000.00 100.1638 $960,570.84 AH121117 02665WAR2 AMERICAN HONDA FINAN CE 12/11/2017 0.545 A+ 12/11/2017 1.8 8,000,000.00 99.8122 $7,984,976.00 HN092017 02665WAY7 AMERICAN HONDA FINAN CE 9/20/2017 0.7626 A+ 9/20/2017 1.5 3,800,000.00 100.1865 $3,807,087.00 AN050116 03255LGX1 ANAHEIM FING AUTH-B 5/1/2016 1% AA- 5/1/2016 0.2 2,850,000.00 99.9940 $2,849,829.00 BA061520 05522RCT3 BA CREDIT CARD TRUST 06/15/20 AAA 6/15/2020 4.2 10,000,000.00 100.0706 $10,007,060.00 BA050817 06050TLX8 BANK OF AMERICA N.A . 05/08/17 A 5/8/2017 1.2 2,700,000.00 99.8131 $2,694,953.70 BA021417 06050TLU4 BANK OF AMERICA NA 2/14/2017 0.7061% A 2/14/2017 0.9 1,720,000.00 100.0068 $1,720,116.96 BA060517 06050TMB5 BANK OF AMERICA NA 06/05/2017 A 6/5/2017 1.2 2,250,000.00 99.8653 $2,246,969.25 BA111416 06050TLS9 BANK OF AMERICA NA 11/14/2016 0.7089% A 11/14/2016 0.7 2,200,000.00 100.0089 $2,200,195.80 BN021417 06050TLT7 BANK OF AMERICA NA 2/14/2017 1.25% A 2/14/2017 0.9 5,000,000.00 100.1240 $5,006,200.00 BO111416 06050TLR1 BANK OF AMERICA NA 11/14/2016 1.125% A 11/14/2016 0.7 4,000,000.00 100.1951 $4,007,804.00 BN072816 06406HBX6 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON 2.3% 7/28/16 A 7/28/2016 0.3 3,947,000.00 100.5170 $3,967,405.99 BK011717 06406HCA5 BANK OF NEW YORK MEL LON CORPORA 01/17/17 A 1/17/2017 0.8 7,000,000.00 101.1076 $7,077,532.00 BA052218 06406HDC0 BANK OF NY MELLON 5/22/18 VARIABLE A 5/22/2018 2.2 5,000,000.00 99.5386 $4,976,930.00 BR011218 084664CD1 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY F IN 1/12/2018 0.5533 AA 1/12/2018 1.8 2,750,000.00 99.9953 $2,749,870.75 BR030718 084664CF6 BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY F IN 3/7/2018 1.16398 AA 3/7/2018 2.0 13,000,000.00 100.3477 $13,045,201.00 AU012218 05581RAC0 BMWLT 2016-1 A2B 1/22/2018 0.92925%AAA 1/22/2018 1.8 10,000,000.00 100.0090 $10,000,900.00 Au042517 09658UAB5 BMWOT 2014-A A2 4/25/2017 0.53%AAA 4/25/2017 1.1 280,351.02 99.9639 $280,249.81 BA112016 097023BC8 BOEING CO 11/20/2016 3.75%A 11/20/2016 0.7 2,750,000.00 101.7380 $2,797,795.00 BB040317 07330NAH8 BRANCH BANKING & TRU ST 4/3/2017 1%A 4/3/2017 1.1 1,100,000.00 99.9118 $1,099,029.80 BB091316 10513KAB0 BRANCH BANKING & TRU ST 9/13/2016 0.5899 A-9/13/2016 0.5 2,000,000.00 99.9304 $1,998,608.00 BB100316 07330NAC9 BRANCH BANKING & TRU ST 10/3/2016 1.45%A 10/3/2016 0.6 800,000.00 100.2508 $802,006.40 BB120116 07330NAF2 BRANCH BANKING & TRU ST 12/1/2016 0.6743 A 12/1/2016 0.8 3,000,000.00 100.0452 $3,001,356.00 BT120116 07330NAG0 BRANCH BANKING & TRU ST 12/1/2016 1.05%A 12/1/2016 0.8 8,325,000.00 100.0844 $8,332,026.30 UN070141 91412GFA8 CA UNI-FLTG-TXB-Y-2 7/1/2041 0.656%AA 7/1/2017 1.3 4,250,000.00 99.9870 $4,249,447.50 CA120116 13066KW21 CALIFORNIA ST DEPT .991% 12/1/16 AAA 12/1/2016 0.8 1,250,000.00 100.1420 $1,251,775.00 CA030317 14912L6H9 CATERPILLAR FINANCIA L SE 3/3/2017 0.562 A 3/3/2017 1.0 5,000,000.00 99.9800 $4,999,000.00 CA090616 14912L5S6 CATERPILLAR FINANCIA L SE 9/6/2016 1.35%A 9/6/2016 0.5 1,000,000.00 100.2961 $1,002,961.00 CA081516 149123BM2 CATERPILLAR INC 08/15/16 A 8/15/2016 0.4 1,549,000.00 101.8069 $1,576,988.88 Cr090718 17305EFE0 CCCIT 2013-A6 A6 9/7/2018 1.32%AAA 9/7/2018 2.5 15,500,000.00 100.1845 $15,528,597.50 Cr011519 161571GJ7 CHAIT 2014-A1 A1 1/15/2019 1.15%AAA 1/15/2019 2.8 13,000,000.00 100.1713 $13,022,269.00 CC030218 166764AW0 CHEVRON CORP 3/2/2018 0.432967%AA-3/2/2018 2.0 4,000,000.00 99.2337 $3,969,348.00 CH111517 166764AK6 CHEVRON CORPORATION 11/15/17 AA-11/15/2017 1.7 2,500,000.00 99.5285 $2,488,212.50 CI061518 17275RAY8 CISCO SYSTEMS INC 06/15/2018 AA-6/15/2018 2.2 5,500,000.00 99.7671 $5,487,190.50 C031017 172967HL8 CITIGROUP INC 3/10/2017 0.7744%A 3/10/2017 1.0 1,000,000.00 99.8721 $998,721.00 C040116 172967GP0 CITIGROUP INC 4/1/2016 1.3%A-4/1/2016 0.1 100,000.00 100.0000 $100,000.00 C042718 172967JQ5 CITIGROUP INC 4/27/2018 0.967%A 4/27/2018 2.1 5,000,000.00 99.3162 $4,965,810.00 C120718 172967KF7 CITIGROUP INC. 12/07/18 A 12/7/2018 2.8 3,000,000.00 98.8811 $2,966,433.00 CM061516 20030NAG6 COMCAST CORP 6/15/2016 4.95%A-6/15/2016 0.2 1,402,000.00 100.8230 $1,413,538.46 CR042718 22546QAW7 CREDIT SUISSE NEW YO RK 4/27/2018 0.9574 A 4/27/2018 2.1 5,500,000.00 99.1553 $5,453,541.50 DU050116 26362VFQ6 DUBLIN USD-TXB-BANS 5/1/2016 4.761%SP-1+5/1/2016 0.2 4,000,000.00 100.2920 $4,011,680.00 XO022818 30231GAS1 EXXON MOBIL CORPORAT ION 2/28/2018 1.231 AAA 2/28/2018 1.9 7,460,000.00 100.3027 $7,482,581.42 FM022717 3135G0XL2 FANNIE MAE 02/27/2017 0.65%AA+2/27/2017 0.9 3,660,000.00 99.9573 $3,658,437.18 FN031417 3135G0VM2 FANNIE MAE 3/14/2017 0.75%AA+3/14/2017 1.0 3,500,000.00 100.0521 $3,501,823.50 FE100316 313312J35 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 10/03/16 A-1+10/3/2016 0.6 10,000,000.00 99.7687 $9,976,870.00 FF080818 3133EFYG6 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 8/8/2018 0.617 AA+8/8/2018 2.4 10,000,000.00 99.9300 $9,993,000.00 FF091718 3133EFM61 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 9/17/2018 0.66 AA+9/17/2018 2.5 10,000,000.00 100.0000 $10,000,000.00 FF112316 3133EEUS7 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 11/23/2016 0.6 AA+11/23/2016 0.7 21,000,000.00 100.0990 $21,020,790.00 ma011317 3133EFJK4 FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANKS 01/13/17 AA+1/13/2017 0.8 10,000,000.00 99.9937 $9,999,370.00 FH060917 313379FW4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN 1.00 6/9/2017 AA+6/9/2017 1.2 23,400,000.00 100.3745 $23,487,633.00 FE063016 313384YU7 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NKS 06/30/16 A-1+6/30/2016 0.2 20,000,000.00 99.9225 $19,984,500.00 FH061016 313373SZ6 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NK 6/10/2016 2.125% AA+6/10/2016 0.2 5,000,000.00 100.3214 $5,016,070.00 FH080116 313384A41 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NKS 08/01/16 A-1+8/1/2016 0.4 3,885,000.00 99.8644 $3,879,731.94 FL092816 3130A2T97 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NK 9/28/2016 0.5%AA+9/28/2016 0.5 10,000,000.00 99.9946 $9,999,460.00 FL112316 3130A3J70 FEDERAL HOME LOAN BA NK 11/23/2016 0.625 AA+11/23/2016 0.7 30,000,000.00 100.0470 $30,014,100.00 FM022618 3134G8L98 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MO RTGAGE CORP 02/26/18 AA+2/26/2018 1.9 10,000,000.00 100.0136 $10,001,360.00 FM033018 3134G8S91 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MO RTGAGE CORP 03/30/18 AA+3/30/2018 2.0 5,000,000.00 100.0889 $5,004,445.00 FM091518 31394JTT4 FEDERAL HOME LOAN MO RTGAGE CORP 09/15/18 AA+9/15/2018 2.5 2,185,805.52 103.5856 $2,264,179.76 FN013018 3135G0B77 FEDERAL NATIONAL MOR TGAGE ASSOC 01/30/18 AA+1/30/2018 1.8 6,000,000.00 101.1084 $6,066,504.00 FN042717 3135G0JA2 FEDERAL NATIONAL MOR TGAGE ASSOC 04/27/17 AA+4/27/2017 1.1 2,000,000.00 100.4685 $2,009,370.00 FN051617 3135G0ZD8 FEDERAL NATIONAL MOR TGAGE ASSOC 05/16/17 AA+5/16/2017 1.2 2,000,000.00 100.2016 $2,004,032.00 FB111816 31677QAZ2 FIFTH THIRD BANK 11/18/2016 0.7481%A-11/18/2016 0.7 8,360,000.00 100.1503 $8,372,565.08 Au051518 31680GAB2 FITAT 2015-1 A2A MTGE 1.02% 05/15/18 Aaa 5/15/2018 2.2 10,400,000.00 99.9812 $10,398,044.80 FH041417 3134G6PN7 FREDDIE MAC 4/14/2017 0.8%AA+4/14/2017 1.1 10,000,000.00 100.0128 $10,001,280.00 FH110116 3134G3S50 FREDDIE MAC 11/1/2016 0.625%AA+11/1/2016 0.7 5,000,000.00 100.0343 $5,001,715.00 FM052617 3134G6E82 FREDDIE MAC 0.85% 05/26/2017 AA+5/26/2017 1.2 11,545,000.00 100.0079 $11,545,912.06 FM061617 3134G6W66 FREDDIE MAC 0.85% 06/16/2017 AA+6/16/2017 1.2 5,000,000.00 100.0218 $5,001,090.00 FM082516 3137EACW7 FREDDIE MAC 2.0 08/25/2016 AA+8/25/2016 0.4 15,000,000.00 100.5927 $15,088,905.00 FM092616 3134G4XW3 FREDDIE MAC 9/26/2016 0.6%AA+9/26/2016 0.5 2,500,000.00 100.0844 $2,502,110.00 FR052617 3134G6R70 FREDDIE MAC 0.75% 05/26/2017 AA+5/26/2017 1.2 5,000,000.00 99.9998 $4,999,990.00 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 746 GE042018 36159LCF1 GE DEALER FLOORPLAN MASTER NT 04/20/18 Aaa 4/20/2018 2.1 4,690,000.00 100.0000 $4,690,000.00 GE010917 36962G5N0 GENERAL ELEC CAP CORP 2.9% 1/9/2017 AA+1/9/2017 0.8 3,000,000.00 101.5712 $3,047,136.00 GE050916 36962G5C4 GENERAL ELEC CAP CORP 2.95% 5/9/16 AA+5/9/2016 0.2 4,000,000.00 100.2597 $4,010,388.00 GE051116 36962G2V5 GENERAL ELEC CAP CORP 05/11/2016 AA+5/11/2016 0.2 4,635,000.00 100.0261 $4,636,209.74 GS121517 38141EC49 GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC. 12/15/17 A 12/15/2017 1.8 6,000,000.00 99.7477 $5,984,862.00 HD011519 41284CAB0 HARLEY-DAVIDSON 0.8% 01/15/19 AAA 1/15/2019 2.8 3,552,837.06 99.8617 $3,547,923.48 Au122117 43813JAC9 HAROT 2014-1 A3 12/21/2017 0.67%AAA 11/21/2017 1.7 2,933,848.13 99.8818 $2,930,380.32 Au071717 43814KAB7 HAROT 2015-1 A2 7/17/2017 0.7%AAA 6/15/2017 1.2 2,587,104.94 99.9716 $2,586,370.20 HI080116 4197915E4 HAWAII-TXBL-REF-ES 8/1/2016 0.731%8/1/2016 0.4 14,250,000.00 100.0350 $14,254,987.50 Au071618 41283YAC1 HDMOT 2013-1 A3 7/16/2018 0.65%Aaa 7/16/2018 2.3 323,006.77 99.9184 $322,743.20 Au011519 41284BAB2 HDMOT 2015-1 A2A 1/15/2019 0.95%AAA 1/15/2019 2.8 6,396,887.50 99.9015 $6,390,586.56 HA072318 43814LAB5 HONDA AUTO RECEIV- ABLES 07/23/18 AAA 7/23/2018 2.3 2,100,000.00 99.8577 $2,097,011.70 HA082117 43813NAB2 HONDA AUTO RECEIV- ABLES 08/21/2017 AAA 8/21/2017 1.4 1,564,149.75 99.9193 $1,562,887.48 HB080718 40428HPW6 HSBC USA INC 8/7/2018 1.0809%A 8/7/2018 2.4 2,000,000.00 99.2784 $1,985,568.00 HB111317 40428HPM8 HSBC USA INC 11/13/2017 0.57185%A 11/13/2017 1.7 7,955,000.00 99.3806 $7,905,726.73 HB062317 40434CAB1 HSBC USA INC. 06/23/17 A 6/23/2017 1.2 3,000,000.00 99.5204 $2,985,612.00 HS011618 40428HPH9 HSBC USA INC. 01/16/18 A 1/16/2018 1.8 2,000,000.00 99.8264 $1,996,528.00 IB072216 459200GX3 IBM CORP 7/22/2016 1.95%AA-7/22/2016 0.3 12,450,000.00 100.4330 $12,503,908.50 ID010117 45656TAQ1 INDUSTRY PUB FACS-A 1/1/2017 1.764%AA 1/1/2017 0.8 7,700,000.00 100.5150 $7,739,655.00 IA031517 4581X0BV9 INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL OPMENT BANK 03/15/17 AAA 3/15/2017 1.0 19,000,000.00 100.2803 $19,053,257.00 IA101816 4581X0BS6 INTER-AMERICAN DEVEL BK 10/18/2016 1.375 Aaa 10/18/2016 0.6 15,000,000.00 100.3461 $15,051,915.00 IN070116 45884AZN6 INTERMOUNTAIN PWR-B 7/1/2016 0.785%A+7/1/2016 0.3 6,000,000.00 100.0310 $6,001,860.00 IB051616 459058DM2 INTERNATIONAL BANK F OR RECONSTR 05/16/16 AAA 5/16/2016 0.2 27,212,000.00 100.0786 $27,233,388.63 IB090116 459056JS7 INTERNATIONAL BANK F OR RECONSTR 09/01/16 AAA 9/1/2016 0.5 5,729,000.00 103.3488 $5,920,852.75 IB092616 45905UQG2 INTERNATIONAL BANK F OR RECONSTR 09/26/16 AAA 9/26/2016 0.5 7,500,000.00 100.1511 $7,511,332.50 IB101516 459056JT5 INTERNATIONAL BANK F OR RECONSTR 10/15/16 AAA 10/15/2016 0.6 1,000,000.00 103.9980 $1,039,980.00 KO112316 45950KBQ2 INTERNATIONAL FINANC E CORPORATI 11/23/16 AAA 11/23/2016 0.7 10,000,000.00 100.2360 $10,023,600.00 IB071916 45905U7F5 INTL BK RECON & DEVE LOP 07/19/2016 0.45%AAA 7/19/2016 0.3 500,000.00 99.9290 $499,645.00 IB091516 459058BS1 INTL BK RECON & DEVE LOP 9/15/2016 1%AAA 9/15/2016 0.5 15,000,000.00 100.3443 $15,051,645.00 IB101416 459058DS9 INTL BK RECON & DEVE LOP 10/14/2016 0.62 AAA 10/14/2016 0.6 10,000,000.00 100.1457 $10,014,570.00 IB121617 45905UVJ0 INTL BK RECON & DEVE LOP 12/16/2017 0.77 Aaa 12/16/2017 1.8 10,000,000.00 99.9683 $9,996,830.00 IF010919 45950VHC3 INTL FINANCE CORP 1/9/2019 0.67685%Aaa 1/9/2019 2.8 10,000,000.00 99.9441 $9,994,410.00 IF051616 45950VCJ3 INTL FINANCE CORP 5/16/2016 0.5%AAA 5/16/2016 0.2 13,295,000.00 99.9945 $13,294,268.78 Ot021518 47787UAB9 JDOT 2015-A A2A 2/15/2018 0.87%AAA 2/15/2018 1.9 5,033,365.70 99.9601 $5,031,357.39 Ot061518 47787WAB5 JDOT 2015-B A2 06/15/2018 0.98%Aaa 6/15/2018 2.2 4,500,000.00 99.9458 $4,497,561.00 OT101518 47788MAB6 JDOT 2016-A A2 10/15/2018 1.15%AAA 10/15/2018 2.6 3,900,000.00 99.9992 $3,899,968.80 DC011618 24422ESU4 JOHN DEERE CAPITAL C ORP 1/16/2018 0.543 A 1/16/2018 1.8 12,165,000.00 99.8868 $12,151,229.22 JP061316 48121CJM9 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA 6/13/2016 0.6101 A-6/13/2016 0.2 6,650,000.00 100.0083 $6,650,551.95 JM032219 46625HQV5 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3/22/2019 A-3/22/2019 3.0 5,000,000.00 100.0382 $5,001,910.00 JP021517 46623EJZ3 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2/15/2017 0.750933%A-2/15/2017 0.9 1,500,000.00 100.0749 $1,501,123.50 JP070516 46625HJA9 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 7/5/2016 3.15%A-7/5/2016 0.3 1,500,000.00 100.6292 $1,509,438.00 KE112516 49327M2E3 KEY BANK NA 11/25/2016 0.7516%A-11/25/2016 0.7 8,000,000.00 100.0385 $8,003,080.00 LD080116 54465AFK3 LA CO REDEV-B-TXBL 8/1/2016 1.074%AA-8/1/2016 0.4 5,735,000.00 100.0100 $5,735,573.50 LO110116 544587B72 LOS ANGELES CALIF MU N IMPT CORP 11/01/16 A+11/1/2016 0.7 10,965,000.00 100.3190 $10,999,978.35 LA070116 5446462D3 LOS ANGELES SD-L-TXB L 7/1/2016 0.68%AA-7/1/2016 0.3 1,000,000.00 100.0330 $1,000,330.00 MA090116 562785LC7 MANHATTAN BEACH CA .856% 9/1/16 AA 9/1/2016 0.5 1,405,000.00 100.1280 $1,406,798.40 MA072517 55279HAH3 MANUF & TRADERS TRUS T CO 7/25/2017 0.53 A 7/25/2017 1.3 10,000,000.00 99.7118 $9,971,180.00 AB021517 58768LAB9 MBALT 2015-A A2A 2/15/2017 0.78%AAA 2/15/2017 0.9 1,092,811.96 99.9894 $1,092,696.12 Au081517 58768LAD5 MBALT 2015-A A3 8/15/2017 1.1%AAA 8/15/2017 1.4 2,500,000.00 100.0339 $2,500,847.50 Au011618 58769AAB2 MBALT 2015-B A2A 1% 01/16/18 AAA 1/16/2018 1.8 10,000,000.00 99.8687 $9,986,870.00 MB061518 58772PAB4 MERCEDES BENZ AUTO R ECEIVABLES 06/15/18 AAA 6/15/2018 2.2 1,896,784.78 99.9273 $1,895,405.81 MI100116 605581FW2 MISSISSIPPI ST-B-TXB L 10/1/2016 0.64%AA 10/1/2016 0.6 2,780,000.00 100.0240 $2,780,667.20 MS100116 605581EP8 MISSISSIPPI ST-D-REF 10/1/2016 0.64%AA 10/1/2016 0.6 2,520,000.00 100.0290 $2,520,730.80 MO010518 61761JVN6 MORGAN STANLEY 1/5/2018 1.007098%A 1/5/2018 1.8 7,938,000.00 99.6559 $7,910,685.34 MO020119 61746BDY9 MORGAN STANLEY 2/1/2019 2.007761%A 2/1/2019 2.9 3,500,000.00 100.9498 $3,533,243.00 UN060616 90520EAC5 MUFG UNION BANK NA 6/6/2016 3%A+6/6/2016 0.2 680,000.00 100.3880 $682,638.40 Au041717 65490BAB1 NALT 2014-B A2A 4/17/2017 0.73%AAA 4/17/2017 1.1 3,525,672.51 99.9409 $3,523,588.84 Au061517 65477WAB2 NAROT 2014-B A2 6/15/2017 0.6%Aaa 6/15/2017 1.2 999,439.44 99.9514 $998,953.71 Au091517 65477UAB6 NAROT 2015-A A2 9/15/2017 0.67%AAA 9/15/2017 1.5 3,156,513.02 99.9661 $3,155,442.96 NA021519 65478UAC3 NAROT 2016-A A2B 2/15/2019 0.777%AAA 2/15/2019 2.9 5,000,000.00 100.0312 $5,001,560.00 NR041017 637432HT5 NATIONAL RURAL UTILI TIES COOPER 04/10/17 A 4/10/2017 1.1 7,000,000.00 104.4054 $7,308,378.00 NR042417 63743HEM0 NATIONAL RURAL UTILI TIES COOPER 04/24/17 A 4/24/2017 1.1 5,000,000.00 99.9849 $4,999,245.00 CM040116 63946BAC4 NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA L LC 4/1/2016 2.875%A-4/1/2016 0.1 2,000,000.00 100.0000 $2,000,000.00 NY021517 64990EJ32 NEW YORK ST DORM AUT 2/15/17 .93%AAA 2/15/2017 0.9 3,685,000.00 100.3520 $3,697,971.20 OC081516 675371AS7 OCEANSIDE PENSION-RE F 8/15/2016 1.406%AA 8/15/2016 0.4 750,000.00 100.0670 $750,502.50 OR110116 68428LDM3 ORANGE CNTY CALIF 11/01/16 AA 11/1/2016 0.7 7,700,000.00 100.0610 $7,704,697.00 OP031717 690353M20 OVERSEAS PRIVATE INV COR 3/17/2017 1.01%A-1+3/17/2017 1.0 3,000,000.00 100.2196 $3,006,588.00 PB060118 69353REN4 PNC BANK NA 06/01/2018 A 6/1/2018 2.2 3,000,000.00 99.0360 $2,971,080.00 PN012717 69353RCG1 PNC BANK NA 1/27/2017 1.125%A 1/27/2017 0.8 12,735,000.00 100.1078 $12,748,728.33 PN110116 69349LAP3 PNC BANK NA 11/1/2016 1.15%A 11/1/2016 0.7 1,060,000.00 100.1284 $1,061,361.04 PO061516 738798BC0 POWAY REDEV AGY-B 6/15/2016 0.95%AA-6/15/2016 0.2 2,000,000.00 100.0030 $2,000,060.00 PO121516 738798BD8 POWAY REDEV AGY-B 12/15/2016 1.1%AA-12/15/2016 0.8 3,545,000.00 100.1500 $3,550,317.50 RI020117 762494QV7 RIALTO USD-TXBL 2/1/2017 1.258%AA 2/1/2017 0.9 800,000.00 100.2890 $802,312.00 RI090116 76912TJC8 RIVERSIDE PUB FIN-RE F 9/1/2016 1%A 9/1/2016 0.5 2,090,000.00 100.0110 $2,090,229.90 SD070116 7973552R4 SAN DIEGO CALIF UNI SCH DIST 07/01/16 AA-7/1/2016 0.3 10,000,000.00 99.9660 $9,996,600.00 SA100116 79876CAV0 SAN MARCOS CA REDEV 1.09% 10/1/16 AA-10/1/2016 0.6 5,125,000.00 100.1700 $5,133,712.50 Au081417 78448MAB3 SMAT 2015-1US A2A 8/14/2017 0.99%AAA 8/14/2017 1.4 2,116,711.92 99.8230 $2,112,965.34 Au011717 89236RAC3 TAOT 2013-A A3 1/17/2017 0.55%AAA 1/17/2017 0.8 15,808.12 99.9872 $15,806.10 AT121517 89231MAC9 TAOT 2014-A A3 12/15/2017 0.67%AAA 12/15/2017 1.8 807,694.73 99.8681 $806,629.38 AT071717 89236WAB4 TAOT 2015-A A2 7/17/2017 0.71%AAA 7/17/2017 1.3 3,618,198.54 99.9561 $3,616,610.15 Au021518 89231TAB6 TAOT 2015-C A2A 2/15/2018 0.93%AAA 2/15/2018 1.9 5,550,000.00 99.9801 $5,548,895.55 KO102717 191216BR0 THE COCA-COLA COMPAN Y 10/27/17 AA-10/27/2017 1.6 1,500,000.00 100.1759 $1,502,638.50 TO011218 89236TCB9 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 1/12/2018 0.57 AA-1/12/2018 1.8 13,000,000.00 99.8672 $12,982,736.00 TO091516 89233P5E2 TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 9/15/2016 2%AA-9/15/2016 0.5 895,000.00 100.6037 $900,403.12 AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 747 UB092616 90521APH5 UNION BANK NA 9/26/2016 1.5%A+9/26/2016 0.5 9,330,000.00 100.1626 $9,345,170.58 UN092616 90521APG7 UNION BANK NA 9/26/2016 0.9996%A+9/26/2016 0.5 2,515,000.00 100.1844 $2,519,637.66 MT061617 90520EAE1 UNION BANK OF CALIFO RNIA NATION 06/16/17 A+6/16/2017 1.2 1,545,000.00 100.5077 $1,552,843.97 T043017 912828SS0 UNITED STATES TREASU RY NOTES 04/30/17 AA+4/30/2017 1.1 10,000,000.00 100.2383 $10,023,830.00 TN113016 912828MA5 UNITED STATES TREASU RY NOTES 11/30/16 AA+11/30/2016 0.7 10,000,000.00 101.4609 $10,146,090.00 UN051516 91412GUT0 UNIV OF CALIFORNIA-A N 5/15/2016 0.634%AA 5/15/2016 0.2 1,830,000.00 100.0100 $1,830,183.00 UC070141 91412GEZ4 UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS 07/01/2041 AA 7/1/2017 1.3 14,380,000.00 99.9760 $14,376,548.80 US111516 91159HHB9 US BANCORP 11/15/2016 2.2%A+11/15/2016 0.7 1,365,000.00 100.8461 $1,376,549.27 UB013017 90331HMC4 US BANK NA CINCINNAT I 1/30/2017 1.1%AA-1/30/2017 0.8 3,100,000.00 100.2222 $3,106,888.20 US012618 90331HMR1 US BANK NA CINCINNAT I 1/26/2018 0.55572 AA-1/26/2018 1.8 11,500,000.00 99.5645 $11,449,917.50 T043016 912828C81 US TREASURY N/B 4/30/2016 0.375%AA+4/30/2016 0.1 20,000,000.00 100.0100 $20,002,000.00 T083116 912828RF9 US TREASURY N/B 8/31/2016 1%AA+8/31/2016 0.4 30,000,000.00 100.2461 $30,073,830.00 TN51516 912828VC1 US TREASURY N/B 5/15/2016 0.25%AA+5/15/2016 0.2 7,980,000.00 99.9951 $7,979,608.98 Au121517 90290KAC9 USAOT 2014-1 A3 12/15/2017 0.58%AAA 12/15/2017 1.8 914,194.33 99.9301 $913,555.31 Au031518 90290XAB3 USAOT 2015-1 A2 3/15/2018 0.82%AAA 3/15/2018 2.0 11,168,738.93 99.9473 $11,162,853.01 Au042018 92867PAC7 VALET 2013-2 A3 4/20/2018 0.7%AAA 4/20/2018 2.1 3,113,959.86 99.6994 $3,104,599.30 VC091516 92343VBN3 VERIZON COMMUNICATIO NS 9/15/2016 2.5%A 9/15/2016 0.5 6,500,000.00 100.7701 $6,550,056.50 VZ060917 92343VCD4 VERIZON COMMUNICATIO NS 6/9/2017 0.6306% A 6/9/2017 1.2 1,000,000.00 99.8009 $998,009.00 VZ091516 92343VBL7 VERIZON COMMUNICATIO NS 9/15/2016 1.7823 A 9/15/2016 0.5 1,925,000.00 100.5418 $1,935,429.65 Au042017 92867QAD3 VWALT 2014-A A3 4/20/2017 0.8%AAA 4/20/2017 1.1 4,160,408.84 99.8944 $4,156,015.45 Au062017 92867VAB6 VWALT 2015-A A2A 6/20/2017 0.87%AAA 6/20/2017 1.2 1,138,406.04 99.7905 $1,136,021.08 VPWF3801 VP7000236 WELLS FARGO ADVANT- AGE HERITAGE AAA 4/1/2016 0.1 16,704,418.28 100.0000 $16,704,418.28 Grand Total $1,077,938,028.67 *Security ratings are updated monthly at month-end. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 748 SECTION III APPENDIX B. INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO DETAIL – MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTED PARTIES B. 3. EAST BAY REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM AUTHORITY (EBRCS) AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 749 EBRCS TRANSACTIONS* For the Quarter Ending March 31, 2016 FY 2015-2016 FUND BALANCE @ TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date TJ/Date BALANCE @ NUMBER 12/31/15 03/31/16 100300 2,232,756.90 2,232,756.90 TOTALS 2,232,756.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,232,756.90 * East Bay Regional Communications System Authority AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 750 EXHIBITS AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 751 Exhibit ICONTRA COSTA COUNTYPortfolio Summary ReportAS OF MARCH 31, 2016Portfolio CharacteristicsPar$3,288,022,252.07Cost$3,287,003,654.96Market Value$3,292,381,060.95Weighted Yield to Maturity0.77%Weighted Average Days to Maturity225 Weighted Duration0.62yrPortfolio Breakdown by InvestmentInvestmentsPar Value Percent of TotalU.S. Treasuries$33,425,000.001.02%U.S.Agencies-Federal, State and Local653,495,000.0019.88%Supranationals15,000,000.000.46%Money Market1,855,088,654.0956.42%ABS/MBS5,140,142.140.16%Corporate Notes140,882,000.004.28%Outside Contractors-LAIF194,240,588.395.91%Outside Contractors-Other 180,084,959.425.48%Cash210,655,908.036.41%TOTAL*$3,288,012,252.07 100.00% **Maturity DistributionTimePar Value Percent of TotalLess 1 yr$2,604,466,728.0079.21%1 to 2 yrs317,369,426.769.65%2 to 3 yrs288,381,340.418.77%3 to 4 yrs68,332,000.002.08%4+ yrs9,472,756.900.29%TOTAL*$3,288,022,252.07 100.00% *** Does not include the Futuris Public Entity Trust of the Contra Costa Community College District Retirement Board of AuthorityU.S. Treasuries1.02%U.S.Agencies‐Federal, State and Local19.88%Supranationals0.46%Money Market56.42%ABS/MBS0.16%Corporate Notes4.28%Outside Contractors‐LAIF5.91%Outside Contractors‐Other 5.48%Cash6.41%PORTFOLIO BREAKDOWNBY INVESTMENTLess 1 yr79.21%1 to 2 yrs9.65%2 to 3 yrs8.77%3 to 4 yrs2.08%4+ yrs0.29%MATURITY DISTRIBUTIONAUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES752 Exhibit IICONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOLPERFORMANCE SUMMARYAS OF MARCH 31, 2016AVERAGE DAYS TO3 PERCENT OFMATURITY AT PARPORTFOLIOYTMEND-OF-QUARTERDURATION($)(%)(%)(day)(year)A. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office$2,703,030,796.23 82.26% 0.8251%2670.731B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors1. Local Agency Investment Fund $194,240,588.39 5.91% 0.4700% 1 N/A2. Othera. Wells Capital Management $44,251,467.61 1.35% 0.7260% 330 0.522b. CalTRUST (Short-Term Fund)$133,610,734.91 4.07%0.6900%1N/AC. Cash$210,655,908.03 6.41%0.3500%41N/A3 Yield to Maturity on Portfolio at End-of-Quarter = 0.77%3 Weighted Average Days to Maturity on Portfolio at End-of-Quarter = 2253 Weighted Duration (yr) at End-of-Quarter =0.621. Data is provided by Sungard.2. Data is provided by Wells Cap Management.3. Excludes: Section B.2.a (EBRCS Bond) of the Investment Pool summary report and Futuris Public Entity Trust4. Earnings Credit Rate on Investable BalanceLAIF and CalTRUST Short-Term are subject to a one day call of principal provision.WEIGHTEDAUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES753 Exhibit III CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL As of March 31, 2016As of December 31, 2015CHANGE IN VALUETYPEPAR VALUEPAR VALUEFROM PREV. QTR.% CHANGEA. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office 1. U.S. Treasuries (STRIPS, Bills, Notes) $33,425,000.00$37,620,000.00 ($4,195,000.00)-11.15% 2. U.S. Agencies Federal Agriculture Mortgage Corporation0.000.000.000.00% Federal Home Loan Banks240,490,000.00235,002,000.00 5,488,000.002.34% Federal National Mortgage Association93,836,000.0092,526,000.00 1,310,000.001.42% Federal Farm Credit Banks181,305,000.00174,036,000.00 7,269,000.004.18% Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation134,219,000.00116,709,000.00 17,510,000.0015.00% Municipal Bonds3,645,000.005,555,000.00 (1,910,000.00)-34.38% Subtotal653,495,000.00623,828,000.00 29,667,000.004.76% 3. Supranationals15,000,000.000.00 15,000,000.00100.00% 4. Money Market Instruments Bankers Acceptances0.000.000.000.00% Repurchase Agreement0.000.000.000.00% Commercial Paper1,021,430,000.00955,477,000.00 65,953,000.006.90% Negotiable Certificates of Deposit830,915,000.00794,998,000.00 35,917,000.004.52% Medium Term Certificates of Deposit2,175,000.004,200,000.00 (2,025,000.00)-48.21% Money Market Accounts565,318.32565,318.320.000.00% Time Deposit3,335.773,335.770.000.00% Subtotal1,855,088,654.091,755,243,654.09 99,845,000.005.69% 5. Asset Backed Securities/Mortgage Backed Securities5,140,142.144,562,799.15 2,093,548.49100.00% 6. Corporate Notes140,882,000.00149,457,000.00 (8,575,000.00)-5.74%TOTAL2,703,030,796.232,570,711,453.24 132,319,342.995.15%B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors 1. Local Agency Investment Fund194,240,588.39209,721,646.14 (15,481,057.75)-7.38% 2. Othera. EBRCS Bond2,232,756.902,232,756.900.000.00%b. Wells Capital Management 44,251,467.61 44,255,885.01 (4,417.40)-0.01%c. CalTRUST (Short-Term Fund)133,610,734.91 148,462,420.81 (14,851,685.90)-10.00%Subtotal180,094,959.42194,951,062.72 (14,856,103.30)-7.62%TOTAL374,335,547.81404,672,708.86 (30,337,161.05)-7.50%C. Cash210,655,908.03248,471,111.50 (37,815,203.47)-15.22%* GRAND TOTAL (FOR A , B, & C)$3,288,022,252.07$3,223,855,273.60 $64,166,978.471.99%* Does not include the Futuris Public Entity Trust of the Contra Costa Community College District Retirement Board of AuthorityAUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES754 CONTRA COSTA INVESTMENT POOLINVESTMENTS MANAGED BY TREASURER'S OFFICEQUARTERLY COUPON RATES, YIELD TO MATURITYExhibit IV Quarter EndingFiscal Year September December March June2015/16Coupon Rate0.6433% 0.7270% 0.8556%Yield to Maturity0.5859% 0.6955% 0.8251%2014/15Coupon Rate0.5437% 0.4624% 0.4912% 0.5309%Yield to Maturity0.4605% 0.4185% 0.4379% 0.4894%2013/14Coupon Rate0.6331% 0.4843% 0.4686% 0.4802%Yield to Maturity0.4645% 0.3709% 0.3680% 0.3877%2012/13Coupon Rate0.8304% 0.5568% 0.5829% 0.5838%Yield to Maturity0.6012% 0.3947% 0.4243% 0.4229%2011/12Coupon Rate0.8769% 0.8385% 0.8122% 0.7426%Yield to Maturity0.6842% 0.6658% 0.6739% 0.6130%2010/11Coupon Rate0.9802% 0.7132% 0.7326% 0.6982%Yield to Maturity0.7494% 0.5866% 0.6133% 0.5612%2009/10Coupon Rate1.2464% 0.8931% 0.8610% 0.8212%Yield to Maturity1.1095% 0.7840% 0.7373% 0.6993%2008/09Coupon Rate4.4019% 1.7623% 1.2918% 1.2418%Yield to Maturity4.2819% 1.6574% 1.1808% 1.1231%2007/08Coupon Rate5.1675% 4.6491% 3.3805% 2.9712%Yield to Maturity5.2022% 4.6583% 3.3454% 2.9048%2006/07Coupon Rate5.1683% 5.1819% 5.2384% 5.2407%Yield to Maturity5.2286% 5.2229% 5.2766% 5.2705%2005/06Coupon Rate3.6925% 4.1660% 4.6328% 5.0427%Yield to Maturity3.6818% 4.1594% 4.6358% 5.0821%Source: All data is calculated by Sungard.AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES755 CONTRA COSTA INVESTMENT POOLINVESTMENTS MANAGED BY OUTSIDE CONTRACTORLAIF QUARTERLY APPORTIONMENT RATESExhibit IV (a)Quarter EndingFiscal Year September December March June2015/16 Apportionment Rate 0.32% 0.37% 0.46%2014/15 Apportionment Rate 0.24% 0.25% 0.26% 0.28%2013/14 Apportionment Rate 0.26% 0.26% 0.23% 0.22%2012/13 Apportionment Rate 0.35% 0.32% 0.28% 0.24%2011/12 Apportionment Rate 0.38% 0.38% 0.38% 0.36%2010/11 Apportionment Rate 0.51% 0.46% 0.50% 0.48%2009/10 Apportionment Rate 0.90% 0.60% 0.56% 0.56%2008/09 Apportionment Rate 2.77% 2.54% 1.91% 1.51%2007/08 Apportionment Rate 5.24% 4.96% 4.18% 3.11%2006/07 Apportionment Rate 4.93% 5.11% 5.17% 5.23%2005/06 Apportionment Rate 3.18% 3.63% 4.03% 4.53%Source: Contra Costa County Treasurer's Quarterly Investment Report - LAIF StatementsAUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES756 Exhibit IV (b)0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%5.50%Contra Costa County Investment Poolas of March 31, 2016TTC "Coupon"TTC "YTM"LAIFAUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES757 Exhibit IV (c)-2.00%-1.00%0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%3/31/16 9/27/16 3/26/17 9/22/17 3/21/18 9/17/18 3/16/19 9/12/19 3/10/20 9/6/20 3/5/21Yield to Maturity Maturity DatesRisk Assessmentas of March 31, 2016CountyTreasurerWells CapitalMgmtUS TreasuriesYield Curve2 Standard Deviations1 Standard Deviation-1 Standard Deviation-2 Standard Deviations1 year2 years3 years5 yearsAUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES758 Risk Assessment(Securities Greater Than Two Standard Deviations) As of March 31, 2016Exhibit IV (d)CUSIPDESCRIPTIONPURCHASE DATEPARCOST MARKETCOUPON (%)MATURITY DATEYTM (%)204712FD0 AUHSD MUNI COMPTONCA CNTY REDEV1/3/12110,000.00 7,453.00 7,453.00 0.008/1/166.53167486YX1 AUHSD MUNI CITY CHICAGO6/27/13270,000.00 70,229.60 70,229.60 5.001/1/17 4.661. Date when the security was transferred from AUHSD to Contra Costa County Investment Pool Managed by Treasurer's Office.2. Date when the security was transferred from AUHSD's Fund 5055 to Fund 5057 per District's request.AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES759 Exhibit VAVERAGE DAYSAVERAGE DAILY TO MATURITY AVERAGE DAYS TOBALANCE PERCENT OF AVERAGE AS A PERCENT MATURITY FOR (PAR)PORTFOLIOYTMOF PORTFOLIOTHE QUARTER A. Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office$2,555,973,486.08 82.52% 0.7823% 223.41 271B. Investments Managed by Outside Contractors 1. Local Agency Investment Fund $201,240,984.45 6.50% 0.4730% 0.06 1 2. Other a. Wells Capital Management $44,273,900.26 1.43% 0.7333% 4.45 311b. CalTRUST Short Term Fund $136,707,125.99 4.41% 0.6467% 0.04 1c. Cash $159,143,790.88 5.14% 0.2590% 0.00 0Total $3,097,339,287.65 100.00% * Weighted Average YTM of Portfolio = 0.73% 228 * Excludes: Section B.2.a (EBRCS Bond) of the Investment Pool Summary and Futuris Public Entity Trust LAIF and CalTRUST Short Term Fund are subject to a one day call of principal provisionCONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOL AVERAGE INFORMATIONJanuary 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES760 Exhibit V (a)CONTRA COSTA COUNTY INVESTMENT POOLSUMMARY OF POOL RATES AND BENCHMARKSAS OF MARCH 31, 2016AveragePool Rates:YTM as ofQuarterlyDays to3/31/16Ave.MaturityTotal County Portfolio (w/o Cash)0.77%0.73%254*1Investments Managed by Treasurer's Office0.83%0.78%271Wells Capital Management 0.73%0.73%311CalTRUST Short Term Fund0.69%0.65%377*2QuarterlyPMIA Ave.ApportionmentEffective RateYieldLocal Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)0.46%0.47%146*21/1/16 - 3/31/16Benchmarks:3/31/16High Ave.LowFederal Fund Rate0.2700% 0.6400% 0.3702% 0.2500%Six Month Treasury Bill0.1975% 0.4075% 0.3229% 0.1925%Six Month LIBOR0.8997% 0.9174% 0.8759% 0.8423%Vanguard Prime Money Mkt Fund0.0900%*1. Cash is excluded from the calculation.*2. Average days to maturity (with a one day call of principal provision)AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES761 Exhibit V (b)0.0000%1.0000%2.0000%3.0000%4.0000%5.0000%6.0000%Contra Costa County Investment PoolAverage Quarterly YTMas of March 31, 2016TreasurerLAIFWells CapitalMgmtCalTRUSTAUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES762 Exhibit VIPurchase CouponDescriptionCUSIPDateRateParMarket CostProvisionsFund #*Svenska Handelsbanken Float CD 8/24/17 86958DH54 11/24/15 0.8280% $1,340,000.00 $1,340,000.00 $1,340,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +45 bps 6911HSBC BK Float CD 11/17/17 40428AR41 11/18/15 0.9541% $2,175,000.00 $2,175,000.00 $2,175,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +59 bps 6911Intel Structured Callable 12/15/17 458140AL4 1/27/14 1.3500% $5,211,000.00 $5,253,313.32 $5,179,629.78 Make-whole call +12.5 bps until 12/15/178177FNMA Callable Multi-Step Up 5/22/183136G1M63 5/22/13 0.7500%$10,000,000.00 $10,006,500.00 $10,000,000.00 Quarterly; First: 11/22/13; Last: 2/22/18; 0.75% to 81775/22/16; 1% to 5/22/17; 2% to 11/22/17; 3% thereafterFNMA Callable 5/25/183136G2K71 5/27/15 1.2500%$10,000,000.00 $10,011,300.00 $10,000,000.00 One time: 5/25/168177BB&T Corp Callable 2/1/1905531FAQ6 9/29/15 2.2500%$1,960,000.00 $1,993,339.60 $1,987,430.20 Call anytime on and after 1/2/197903FFCB Callable 2/22/193133EFYS0 3/2/16 1.1500%$10,000,000.00 $10,012,700.00 $9,983,594.44 Call anytime on and after 2/22/178177FHLMC Step Up 9/30/193134G8PD5 3/30/16 1.3500%$10,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00 $10,000,000.00 One time: 3/30/178177Total$50,686,000.00* Fund #6911 Contra Costa County Schools Insurance Group7903 Contra Costa Community College District Retiree Health Benefits8177 County (Pool)CONTRA COSTA COUNTYTREASURER'S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOSTRUCTURED SECURITIESMarch 31, 2016AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES763 Exhibit VI (a)DESCRIPTIONCUSIPMATURITY DATEPARMARKETCOSTPROVISIONS($)($)($)AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 9/20/2017 0.7626 02665WAY79/20/2017 3,800,000.00 3,807,087.00 3,800,414.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +45 bpsAMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 12/11/2017 0.545 02665WAR212/11/2017 8,000,000.00 7,984,976.00 8,000,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +31 bpsANAHEIM FING AUTH-B 5/1/2016 1%03255LGX15/1/2016 2,850,000.00 2,849,829.00 2,850,000.00 Make‐whole call BANK OF AMERICA NA 11/14/2016 0.7089% 06050TLS9 11/14/2016 2,200,000.00                2,200,195.80 2,200,000.00                      Float quarterly: LIBOR +47 bpsBANK OF AMERICA NA 2/14/2017 0.7061% 06050TLU4 2/14/20171,720,000.00 1,720,116.96 1,718,780.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +47 bps BANK OF AMERICA NA 06/05/201706050TMB56/5/2017 2,250,000.00                2,246,969.25 2,250,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +45 bpsBA CREDIT CARD TRUST 06/15/2005522RCT36/15/2020 10,000,000.00 10,007,060.00 10,003,906.25 5% clean up callBANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORPORA 01/17/17 06406HCA51/17/2017 2,000,000.00 2,018,886.00 2,036,280.00 Call on anytime on or after 12/18/16BANK OF NY MELLON 5/22/18 VARIABLE06406HDC05/22/2018 5,000,000.00                4,976,930.00 4,998,500.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +38 bpsBERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FIN 1/12/2018 0.5533 084664CD11/12/2018 2,750,000.00 2,749,870.75 2,750,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +30 bpsBMWLT 2016-1 A2B 1/22/2018 0.92925%05581RAC01/22/2018 10,000,000.00 10,000,900.00 10,000,000.00 Float monthly: LIBOR +50 bps; 5% clean up callBMWOT 2014-A A2 4/25/2017 0.53%09658UAB54/25/2017280,351.02 280,249.81 280,341.54 5% clean up callBRANCH BANKING & TRUST 4/3/2017 1% 07330NAH8 4/3/2017 1,100,000.00 1,099,029.80 1,096,370.00 Call on and anytime after 3/3/17BRANCH BANKING & TRUST  12/1/2016 0.6743 07330NAF212/1/20163,000,000.00 3,001,356.00 3,001,780.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +43 bps; Call after 11/1/16BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 12/1/2016 1.05% 07330NAG012/1/20168,125,000.00 8,332,026.30 8,135,667.00 Call anytime after 11/1/16BRANCH BANKING & TRUST 9/13/2016 0.5899 10513KAB09/13/20162,000,000.00 1,998,608.00 1,994,850.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +32 bpsBRANCH BANKING & TRUST 10/3/2016 1.45% 07330NAC9 10/3/2016 800,000.00 802,006.40 802,656.00 Call on and anytime after 9/3/16CA UNI-FLTG-TXB-Y-2 7/1/2041 0.656%91412GFA87/1/20174,250,000.00 4,249,447.50 4,249,500.00 Float monthly: LIBOR +50 bpsCATERPILLAR INC 08/15/16149123BM28/15/2016 1,549,000.00 1,576,988.88 1,589,490.86 Make‐whole call +12.5 bpsCALIFORNIA ST DEPT .991% 12/1/1613066KW2112/1/20161,250,000.00 1,251,775.00 1,251,250.00 Make‐whole call +20 bpsCCCIT 2013-A6 A6 9/7/2018 1.32% 17305EFE09/7/201815,500,000.00 15,528,597.50 15,559,677.71 5% clean up callCHAIT 2014-A1 A1 1/15/2019 1.15%161571GJ71/15/201913,000,000.00 13,022,269.00 13,057,890.69 10% clean up callCHEVRON CORP 3/2/2018 0.432967%166764AW03/2/2018 4,000,000.00 3,969,348.00 4,000,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +17 bps CISCO SYSTEMS INC 06/15/201817275RAY86/15/2018 5,500,000.00 5,487,190.50 5,500,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +31 bpsCITIGROUP INC 3/10/2017 0.7744%172967HL83/10/2017 1,000,000.00 998,721.00 999,690.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +54 bpsCITIGROUP INC 4/27/2018 0.967%172967JQ54/27/2018 5,000,000.00 4,965,810.00 5,000,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +69 bpsCITIGROUP INC. 12/07/18172967KF712/7/2018 3,000,000.00 2,966,433.00 3,000,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +86 bpsCOMCAST CORP 6/15/2016 4.95%20030NAG66/15/20161,402,000.00 1,413,538.46 1,501,163.46 Make‐whole call +20 bps until 5/15/15CREDIT SUISSE NEW YORK 4/27/2018 0.9574 22546QAW74/27/2018 5,500,000.00                5,453,541.50 5,500,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +68 bpsFANNIE MAE 02/27/2017 0.65%3135G0XL22/27/20173,660,000.00 3,658,437.18 3,654,876.00 Quarterly; First 11/27/13; Last 11/27/16FEDERAL FARM CREDITBANK 8/8/2018 0.617 3133EFYG68/8/2018 10,000,000.00 9,993,000.00 10,000,000.00 Float monthly: LIBOR +19 bpsFEDERAL FARM CREDITBANK 9/17/2018 0.66 3133EFM619/17/2018 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 10,000,000.00 Float monthly: LIBOR +22 bpsFEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP 02/26/18 3134G8L982/26/2018 10,000,000.00 10,001,360.00 10,000,000.00 Quarterly; First 5/26/16; Last: 11/26/17FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP 03/30/18 3134G8S913/30/2018 5,000,000.00 5,004,445.00 5,004,500.00 Quarterly; First 6/30/16; Last: 12/30/17FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORP 09/15/18 31394JTT49/15/2018 2,497,065.03 2,264,179.76 2,597,727.96 1% clean up callFEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC 05/16/17 3135G0ZD85/16/2017 2,000,000.00 2,004,032.00 2,019,420.00 One time: 5/16/16FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOC 01/30/18 3135G0B771/30/2018 6,000,000.00 6,066,504.00 6,079,380.00 One time: 1/30/17FITAT 2015-1 A2A MTGE 1.02% 05/15/1831680GAB25/15/2018 10,400,000.00 10,398,044.80 10,399,716.08 10% collateral callFREDDIE MAC 4/14/2017 0.8%3134G6PN74/14/2017 10,000,000.00              10,001,280.00 10,012,500.00 One time: 4/14/16FREDDIE MAC 0.85% 05/26/20173134G6E825/26/201711,545,000.00 11,545,912.06 11,543,845.50 Quarterly; First 8/26/15; Last 2/26/17FREDDIE MAC0.75% 05/26/20173134G6R705/26/20175,000,000.00 4,999,990.00 4,995,500.00 One time: 5/26/16FREDDIE MAC 0.85% 06/16/20173134G6W666/16/20175,000,000.00 5,001,090.00 5,000,000.00 One time: 6/16/16FIFTH THIRD BANK 11/18/2016 0.7481% 31677QAZ2 11/18/20168,360,000.00 8,372,565.08 8,371,221.50 Float quarterly: LIBOR +51 bps; Call after 10/18/16GE DEALER FLOORPLANMASTER NT 04/20/18 36159LCF1 4/20/20184,690,000.00 4,690,000.00 4,690,000.00 Float monthly: LIBOR +40 bps; 10% clean up callGENERAL ELEC CAPCORP 05/11/2016 36962G2V5 5/11/20164,635,000.00 4,636,209.74 4,583,207.70 Float quarterly: LIBOR +20 bpsGOLDMAN SACHS GROUPINC. 12/15/1738141EC4912/15/2017 6,000,000.00 5,984,862.00 5,981,820.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +80 bpsHARLEY-DAVIDSON 0.8% 01/15/1941284CAB01/15/20193,552,837.06 3,547,923.48 3,552,811.11 10% collateral callHAROT 2015-1 A2 7/17/2017 0.7%43814KAB76/15/2017 2,587,104.94 2,586,370.20 2,588,351.94 10% collateral callHAROT 2014-1 A3 11/21/2017 0.67%43813JAC911/21/2017 2,933,848.13 2,930,380.32 2,932,243.70 10% collateral callHAWAII-TXBL-REF-ES 8/1/2016 0.731%4197915E48/1/201614,250,000.00 14,254,987.50 14,251,690.00 Make‐whole call +10 bpsHDMOT 2013‐1 A3 7/16/2018 0.65% 41283YAC1 7/16/2018323,006.77 322,743.20 322,577.77 10% collateral callHDMOT 2015-1 A2A 1/15/2019 0.95%41284BAB21/15/2019 6,396,887.50 6,390,586.56 6,396,835.69 10% collateral up callHONDA AUTO RECEIV-ABLES 08/21/201743813NAB28/21/2017 1,564,149.75 1,562,887.48 1,564,056.05 10% clean up callHONDA AUTO RECEIV-ABLES 07/23/1843814LAB57/23/2018 2,100,000.00 2,097,011.70 2,099,961.78 10% collateral callHSBC USA INC. 06/23/1740434CAB16/23/2017 3,000,000.00 2,985,612.00 2,984,790.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +30 bpsHSBC USA INC 11/13/2017 0.57185%40428HPM811/13/20177,955,000.00 7,905,726.73 7,953,996.43 Float quarterly: LIBOR +34 bpsHSBC USA INC 8/7/2018 1.0809%40428HPW68/7/2018 2,000,000.00 1,985,568.00 2,000,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +77 bpsIBM CORP 7/22/2016 1.95%459200GX37/22/201612,450,000.00 12,503,908.50 12,714,064.50 Make‐whole call +15 bps until 7/22/16INDUSTRY PUB FACS-A 1/1/2017 1.764% 45656TAQ11/1/20177,700,000.00 7,739,655.00 7,700,000.00 Make‐whole call +25 bps INTL BK RECON & DEVELOP 12/16/2017 0.77 45905UVJ012/16/2017 10,000,000.00 9,996,830.00 10,000,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +14 bpsINTL FINANCE CORP 1/9/2019 0.67685%45950VHC31/9/2019 10,000,000.00 9,994,410.00 9,971,500.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +6 bpsJDOT 2015-A A2A 2/15/2018 0.87%47787UAB92/15/2018 5,033,365.70 5,031,357.39 5,033,041.56 10% clean up callCONTRA COSTA COUNTYCALTRUST SHORT TERM FUNDSTRUCTURED SECURITIESMarch 31, 2016AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES764 Exhibit VI (a)DESCRIPTIONCUSIPMATURITY DATEPARMARKETCOSTPROVISIONS($)($)($)CONTRA COSTA COUNTYCALTRUST SHORT TERM FUNDSTRUCTURED SECURITIESMarch 31, 2016JDOT 2015-B A20 6/15/2018 0.98%47787WAB56/15/2018 4,500,000.00 4,497,561.00 4,499,848.35 10% clean up callJDOT 2016-A A210/15/2018 1.15%47788MAB610/15/2018 3,900,000.00 3,899,968.80 3,899,988.30 10% clean up callJOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORP 1/16/2018 0.543 24422ESU41/16/2018 12,165,000.00 12,151,229.22 12,181,594.50 Float quarterly: LIBOR +29 bpsJP MORGAN CHASE BANKNA  6/13/2016 0.6101 48121CJM96/13/2016 6,650,000.00                6,650,551.95 6,576,340.50                      Float quarterly: LIBOR +33 bpsJPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2/15/2017 0.750933% 46623EJZ32/15/2017 1,500,000.00                1,501,123.50 1,503,180.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +52 bpsJPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3/22/201946625HQV53/22/2019 5,000,000.00 5,001,910.00 5,000,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +84 bpsKEY BANK NA 11/25/2016 0.7516%49327M2E311/25/2016 8,000,000.00                8,003,080.00 8,023,008.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +49 bps; Call on and anytime after 10/25/16LOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORP 11/01/16 544587B7211/1/2016 10,965,000.00 10,999,978.35 10,965,000.00 Make‐whole callMANUF & TRADERS TRUST CO 7/25/2017 0.53 55279HAH37/25/2017 10,000,000.00 9,971,180.00 9,984,500.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +30 bps MBALT 2015-A A2A 2/15/2017 0.78%58768LAB92/15/2017 1,092,811.96 1,092,696.12 1,092,750.22 10% clean up callMBALT 2015-A A3 8/15/2017 1.1%58768LAD58/15/2017 2,500,000.00 2,500,847.50 2,500,781.25 10% clean up callMBALT 2015-B A2A 1% 01/16/1858769AAB21/16/2018 10,000,000.00 9,986,870.00 9,999,108.00 5% clean up callMERCEDES BENZ AUTO RECEIVABLES 06/15/18 58772PAB46/15/2018 1,896,784.78 1,895,405.81 1,894,117.42 5% collateral callMISSISSIPPI ST-B-TXBL 10/1/2016 0.64%605581FW210/1/2016 2,780,000.00 2,780,667.20 2,780,000.00 Make‐whole call +20 bps MISSISSIPPI ST-D-REF10/1/2016 0.64%605581EP810/1/2016 2,520,000.00 2,520,730.80 2,520,000.00 Make‐whole call +25 bpsMORGAN STANLEY 1/5/2018 1.007098%61761JVN61/5/20187,938,000.00 7,910,685.34 7,946,613.24 Float quarterly: LIBOR +74 bpsMORGAN STANLEY 2/1/2019 2.007761%61746BDY92/1/2019 3,500,000.00 3,533,243.00 3,500,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +137.5 bpsNALT 2014-B A2A 4/17/2017 0.73%65490BAB14/17/2017 3,525,672.51 3,523,588.84 3,525,396.45 10% clean up callNAROT 2014-B A2 6/15/2017 0.6%65477WAB26/15/2017999,439.44 998,953.71 999,385.76 5% collateral callNAROT 2015-A A2 9/15/2017 0.67%65477UAB69/15/2017 3,156,513.02 3,155,442.96 3,156,353.93 5% collateral callNAROT 2016-A A2B2/15/2019 0.777%65478UAC32/15/2019 5,000,000.00 5,001,560.00 5,000,000.00 5% collateral callNATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPER 04/10/17637432HT5 4/10/2017 7,000,000.00 7,308,378.00 7,355,350.00 Make‐whole call +20 bpsNATIONAL RURAL UTILITIES COOPER 04/24/1763743HEM0 4/24/2017 5,000,000.00 4,999,245.00 4,994,500.00 Make‐whole call +7 bpsNEW YORK ST DORM AUT 2/15/17 .93%64990EJ322/15/2017 3,685,000.00 3,697,971.20 3,685,221.10 Make‐whole call +20 bps OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVCOR 3/17/2017 1.01% 690353M203/17/2017 3,000,000.00 3,006,588.00 3,000,000.00 Make‐whole call +25 bpsPNC BANK NA 11/1/2016 1.15%69349LAP311/1/2016 1,060,000.00 1,061,361.04 1,060,922.20 Call on and anytime after 10/2/16PNC BANK NA 06/01/201869353REN46/1/2018 3,000,000.00 2,971,080.00 3,000,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +42 bpsPNC BANK NA 1/27/2017 1.125%69353RCG11/27/2017 12,735,000.00 12,748,728.33 12,757,197.90 Call on and anytime after 10/1/15TAOT 2013-A A3 1/17/2017 0.55%89236RAC31/17/201715,808.12 15,806.10 15,818.00 5% collateral callTAOT 2014-A A31 2/15/2017 0.67%89231MAC912/15/2017807,694.73 806,629.38 806,022.55 5% collateral callTAOT 2015-A A2 7/17/2017 0.71%89236WAB47/17/2017 3,618,198.54 3,616,610.15 3,618,164.17 5% collateral callTAOT 2015-C A2A 2/15/2018 0.93%89231TAB62/15/2018 5,550,000.00 5,548,895.55 5,549,553.78 5% collateral callTHE COCA-COLA COMPANY 10/27/17191216BR010/27/2017 1,500,000.00 1,502,638.50 1,499,340.00 Make‐whole call +5 bpsTOYOTA MOTOR CREDITCORP 9/15/2016 2% 89233P5E29/15/2016895,000.00 900,403.12 911,512.75 Make‐whole call +20 bps UNIV OF CALIFORNIA‐AN  5/15/2016 0.634% 91412GUT05/15/2016 1,830,000.00                1,830,183.00 1,830,000.00                      Make‐whole call +5 bpsUNION BANK NA 9/26/2016 0.9996% 90521APG7 9/26/20162,515,000.00 2,519,637.66 2,517,311.05 Float quarterly: LIBOR +75 bps UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA NATION 06/16/17 90520EAE16/16/2017 1,545,000.00 1,552,843.97 1,558,735.05 Make‐whole call +30 bpsTOYOTA MOTOR CREDITCORP 1/12/2018 0.57 89236TCB91/12/2018 5,550,000.00 5,548,895.55 5,549,553.78 Float quarterly: LIBOR +32 bps UNIVERSITY CALIF REVS 07/01/2041191412GEZ47/1/2017 14,380,000.00 14,376,548.80 14,380,000.00 Float monthly: LIBOR +58 bpsUNION BANK NA9/26/2016 1.5%90521APH59/26/2016 9,330,000.00 9,345,170.58 9,370,530.60 Call on and anytime after 8/26/16US BANCORP 11/15/2016 2.2%91159HHB911/15/2016 1,365,000.00 1,376,549.27 1,383,045.30 Call on and anytime after 10/14/16US BANK NA CINCINNATI 1/30/2017 1.1%90331HMC41/30/2017 3,100,000.00 3,106,888.20 3,100,145.00 Call on and anytime after 12/30/16US BANK NA CINCINNATI 1/26/2018 0.55572 90331HMR11/26/2018 11,500,000.00 11,449,917.50 11,473,440.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +30 bps USAOT 2014-1 A31 2/15/2017 0.58%90290KAC912/15/2017914,194.33 913,555.31 913,837.22 10% collateral callUSAOT 2015-1 A23/15/2018 0.82%90290XAB33/15/2018 11,168,738.93 11,162,853.01 11,168,323.45 10% collateral callVALET 2013-2 A3 4/20/2018 0.7%92867PAC74/20/2018 3,113,959.86 3,104,599.30 3,104,350.37 10% collateral callVERIZON COMMUNICATIONS  9/15/2016 1.7823 92343VBL7 9/15/2016 1,925,000.00                1,935,429.65 1,925,000.00                      Float quarterly: LIBOR +153 bpsVERIZON COMMUNICATIONS 9/15/2016 2.5% 92343VBN39/15/2016 6,500,000.00 6,550,056.50 6,553,170.00 Make‐whole call +30 bpsVERIZON COMMUNICATIONS  6/9/2017 0.6306% 92343VCD4 6/9/2017 1,000,000.00                998,009.00 1,000,000.00                      Float quarterly: LIBOR +40 bps VWALT 2014-A A3 4/20/2017 0.8%92867QAD34/20/20177,023,042.46 4,156,015.45 4,163,089.90 10% clean up callVWALT 2015-A A2A 6/20/2017 0.87%92867VAB66/20/2017 1,138,406.04 1,136,021.08 1,138,400.47 10% clean up callTotal572,813,880.60 570,242,409.36 571,058,343.34 Notes:1. The security has a mandatory put date of 7/1/2017.Contra Costa County invests approximately $133.6 million in the CalTRUST Short Term Fund which had assets of $1,079.9 million as of 3/31/16. The above data represents the information at the Short Term Fund level, not at the Contra Costa County account level.AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES765 Exhibit VI (b)DESCRIPTIONCUSIPMATURITY DATEPARMARKETCOSTPROVISIONSAMERICAN HONDA FINANCE02665WAY7 9/20/2017 $500,000.00 $501,111.40 $500,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +45 bpsAMERICAN HONDA FINANCE02665WAY7 9/20/2017 $250,000.00 $250,555.70 $250,057.50 Float quarterly: LIBOR +45 bpsANAHEIM FING AUTH-B03255LGX15/1/2016 $750,000.00 $753,372.50 $750,000.00 Make-whole callBANK OF AMERICA NA06050TLU42/14/2017 $500,000.00 $500,714.13 $500,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +47 bps BANK OF AMERICA NA06050TMB56/5/2017 $250,000.00 $249,851.72 $250,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +45 bpsBERKSHIRE HATHAWAY FIN084664CD1 1/12/2018 $750,000.00 $751,499.92 $750,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +30 bps BLACKROCK INC09247XAC5 9/15/2017 $500,000.00 $538,246.39 $539,065.00 Make-whole call +30 bpsBMWLT-161-A2B05581RAC0 1/22/2018 $600,000.00 $600,224.70 $600,000.00 Float monthly: LIBOR +50 bpsBRANCH BANING AND TRUST CO07330NAH84/3/2017 $700,000.00 $702,843.71 $697,690.00 Call on and anytime after 3/3/17CCCIT-13A6-A617305EFE09/7/2018 $750,000.00 $752,043.60 $751,787.11 5% clean up callCHEVRON CORP166764AL4 11/15/2017 $700,000.00 $707,773.58 $698,005.00 Make-whole call +10 bpsCISCO SYSTEMS INC17275RAY8 6/15/2018 $750,000.00 $748,587.53 $750,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +31 bpsCOCA-COLA CO191216BR0 10/27/2017 $300,000.00 $301,650.62 $299,868.00 Make-whole call +5 bpsFITAT-151-A2A31680GAB2 5/15/2018 $500,000.00 $500,132.62 $499,986.35 10% collateral callHONDO-151A243814KAB7 6/15/2017 $159,462.77 $159,467.12 $159,454.44 10% collateral callHAWAII-TXBL-REF-ES4197915E48/1/2016 $750,000.00 $752,031.25 $750,000.00 Make-whole call +10 bpsHARLY-151-A2A41284BAB2 1/15/2019 $247,941.38 $247,785.36 $247,939.37 10% collateral callHOME DEPOT INC437076BJ09/15/2017 $750,000.00 $752,980.53 $751,401.98 Float quarterly: LIBOR +37 bpsHARLY-1541-A2A41284AAB4 4/15/2018 $29,979.48 $29,972.77 $29,977.45 10% clean up callJDOT 2015-B A247787WAB5 6/15/2018 $400,000.00 $399,957.22 $399,986.52 10% clean up callLOS ANGELES CALIF MUN IMPT CORP LEASE REV544587B7211/1/2016 $490,000.00 $493,199.70 $490,000.00 Make-whole call MBART-151-A2A58772PAB4 6/15/2018 $601,419.56 $601,201.33 $600,573.82 5% collateral callMISSISSIPPI ST-B-TXBL605581FW2 10/1/2016 $300,000.00 $301,407.00 $300,000.00 Make-whole call +20 bpsNAROT 2014-B A265477WAB2 6/15/2017 $193,439.89 $193,397.44 $193,429.51 5% collateral callPNC BANK NA69353RCG1 1/27/2017 $750,000.00 $752,308.50 $750,000.00 Call on and anytime after 12/28/16TAOT 2015-A A289236WAB4 7/17/2017 $324,017.78 $323,977.91 $324,014.70 5% collateral callUNIV OF CALIFORNIA REVENUES91412GUT0 5/15/2016 $250,000.00 $250,731.28 $250,000.00 Make-whole call +5 bpsUNIV OF CALIFORNIA REVENUES91412GEZ47/1/2017 $300,000.00 $300,149.32 $300,000.00 Float monthly: LIBOR +50 bps Put 1/1/17USAOT 2015-1 A290290XAB3 3/15/2018 $469,028.41 $468,952.16 $469,010.95 10% collateral callUS BANK NA CINCINNATI90331HMR1 1/26/2018 $300,000.00 $299,199.01 $300,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +30 bps US BANK NA CINCINNATI90331HMR1 1/26/2018 $450,000.00 $448,798.51 $451,206.00 10% clean up callVOLKSWAGEN GROUP AMERICA928668AD45/23/2016 $500,000.00 $499,283.88 $500,000.00 Float quarterly: LIBOR +22 bps Total$15,065,289.27 $15,133,408.41 $15,103,453.70CONTRA COSTA COUNTYWELLS CAP MANAGEMENTSTRUCTURED SECURITIESMarch 31, 2016AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES766 Pooled Money Investment Account PAR VALUES MATURING BY DATE AND TYPE Maturities in Millions of Dollars 1 day 31 days 61 days 91 days 121 days 151 days 181 days 211 days 271 days 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years to to to to to to to to to to to to to ITEM 30 days 60 days 90 days 120 days 150 days 180 days 210 days 270 days 1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 year/out TREASURY 1,000$ 1,300$ 3,200$ 4,350$ 1,200$ 3,350$ 1,200$ 3,650$ 5,050$ 6,950$ 100$ REPO TDs 2,071$ 1,513$ 1,470$ 151$ 224$ 212$ 8$ AGENCY 2,677$ 1,000$ 1,800$ 630$ 500$ 800$ 525$ 50$ 100$ 1,075$ 333$ CP 2,350$ 1,050$ 550$ 450$ 200$ 100$ CDs + BNs 4,600$ 1,150$ 1,700$ 2,300$ 200$ 400$ 500$ 100$ 100$ CORP BND TOTAL 62,238$ 12,698$ 6,013$ 8,720$ 7,881$ 2,324$ 4,862$ 2,233$ 3,800$ 5,250$ 8,025$ 433$ -$ -$ PERCENT 20.4%9.7%14.0%12.7%3.7%7.8%3.6%6.1%8.4%12.9%0.7%0.0%0.0% Notes: 1. SBA Floating Rate Securities are represented at coupon change date. 2. Mortgages are represented at current book value. 3. Figures are rounded to the nearest million. 4. Does not include AB55 and General Fund loans. Portfolio as of 03-31-16 Exhibit VII State of California AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 767 State of California Pooled Money Investment Account Market Valuation 3/31/2016 Description Carrying Cost Plus Accrued Interest Purch. Amortized Cost Fair Value Accrued Interest United States Treasury: Bills 11,410,745,648.58$ 11,428,324,382.05$ 11,433,051,500.00$ NA Notes 19,895,104,458.35$ 19,894,615,430.08$ 19,906,919,000.00$ 27,575,588.00$ Federal Agency: SBA 652,389,707.86$ 652,377,032.02$ 644,595,522.94$ 830,290.94$ MBS-REMICs 67,195,956.41$ 67,195,956.41$ 71,568,446.72$ 318,368.46$ Debentures 980,003,053.62$ 980,000,442.51$ 980,561,200.00$ 1,159,694.90$ Debentures FR -$ -$ -$ -$ Discount Notes 6,386,297,958.28$ 6,395,635,458.25$ 6,396,175,500.00$ NA GNMA -$ -$ -$ -$ Supranational Debentures 350,136,669.79$ 350,136,669.79$ 350,709,000.00$ 454,512.50$ CDs and YCDs FR 300,000,000.00$ 300,000,000.00$ 300,000,000.00$ 381,190.56$ Bank Notes 200,000,000.00$ 200,000,000.00$ 200,000,000.00$ 387,333.33$ CDs and YCDs 10,550,003,344.94$ 10,550,003,344.94$ 10,549,420,471.66$ 13,218,388.84$ Commercial Paper 4,692,552,222.25$ 4,696,239,430.61$ 4,696,381,138.89$ NA Corporate: Bonds FR -$ -$ -$ -$ Bonds -$ -$ -$ -$ Repurchase Agreements -$ -$ -$ -$ Reverse Repurchase -$ -$ -$ -$ Time Deposits 5,647,440,000.00$ 5,647,440,000.00$ 5,647,440,000.00$ NA AB 55 & GF Loans 6,030,937,000.00$ 6,030,937,000.00$ 6,030,937,000.00$ NA TOTAL 67,162,806,020.08$ 67,192,905,146.66$ 67,207,758,780.21$ 44,325,367.53$ Fair Value Including Accrued Interest $ 67,252,084,147.74 Repurchase Agreements, Time Deposits, AB 55 & General Fund loans, and Reverse Repurchase agreements are carried at portfolio book value (carrying cost). The value of each participating dollar equals the fair value divided by the amortized cost (1.00022106). As an example: if an agency has an account balance of $20,000,000.00, then the agency would report its participation in the LAIF valued at $20,004,421.19 or $20,000,000.00 x 1.00022106. Exhibit VII (a) State of California All investments are in U.S. Dollar according to the State of California. AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 768 Pooled Money Investment Account DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Portfolio Holdings: Structured Notes and Asset-Backed Securities The Treasury Investment Division has received a number of inquiries concerning our various portfolio holdings. Questions involving structured notes, derivative products*, and asset-backed securities are the most notable. In an effort to clarify the information provided in our monthly statements, we would like to share with you our investment positions in structured notes and asset-backed securities. Following are the State of California Treasurer’s holdings in each category as of March 31, 2016: *The Pooled Money Investment Account Portfolio has not invested in, nor will it invest in, Derivative Products as defined in FASB 133. Exhibit VII (b) State of California AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 769 1.Structured Notes Structured notes are debt securities (other than asset-backed securities) whose cash flow characteristics (coupon rate, redemption amount, or stated maturity) depend upon one or more indices and/or that have embedded forwards or options. They are issued by corporations and by government-sponsored enterprises such as the Federal National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Bank System or an international agency such as the World Bank. Securities Accountability Structured Notes a.Callable Agency $ 0.000 million b.LIBOR Agency Floater $ 0.000 million c.3 month LIBOR Corporate Floater $ 0.000 million d.3 month LIBOR Bank Floater $ 300.000 million e.2 year CMT Corporate Floater $ 0.000 million f.3 month T-Bill Agency Floater $ 0.000 million g.3 month T-Bill Corporate Floater $ 0.000 million U.S. $300.000 million As of: 03/31/16 2.Asset-Backed Securities Asset-backed securities entitle the purchaser to receive a share of the cash flows from a pool of assets such as principal and interest repayments from a pool of mortgages (such as CMOs), small business loans, or credit card receivables (such as ABCP). Asset-Backed Securities a.Small Business Administration Pools $ 652.390 million b.Agency MBS-REMIC’S $ 67.196 million (Medium term sub-total) $ 719.586 million c.Commercial Paper (Short term sub-total) $ 249.364 million U.S. $968.950 million As of: 03/31/16 Exhibit VII (b) State of California AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 770 Total Portfolio As of: 03/31/16 $67,663,843,641.24 Structured notes and Medium-term Asset-backed securities as a percent of portfolio: 1.51% Short-term Asset-Backed Commercial Paper (ABCP) as a percent of portfolio: 0.37% * Total Medium-term and Short-term Structured notes and Asset-backed securities as a percent of portfolio: 1.88% *ABCP purchased by the Pooled Money Investment Account (PMIA) does not include Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) nor do any of the approved ABCP programs include SIVs as underlying assets. Exhibit VII (b) State of California AUGUST 2, 2016 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES 771 Exhibit VIIIPar Value2,703,030,796.23     Book Price99.953Book Value2,701,750,532.54     Average Days to Maturity 267Market Value 2,707,085,155.22     Coupon0.8556%Market Price100.150                      YTM0.8251%Yield ChangeMarket ValueMarket Price Gain/Loss2(bps)($)($)(bps)‐502,717,048,599.90  100.51936.84‐252,712,052,692.25  100.33418.37‐102,709,068,780.73  100.2237.2902,707,085,155.23  100.1500.00102,705,106,031.08  100.077‐7.29252,702,145,752.25  99.967‐18.27502,697,234,249.44  99.786‐36.35Note: Stress Testing is a form of testing that is used to determine the stability of a given system or entity.  It reveals how well a portfolio is positionedin the event the forecasts prove true. The stress test conducted on the portfolio managed by the Treasurer's Office identifies the sensitivity of our portfolio to the change in interest rate. The test result shows if the yield were to go down by 50 bps, the market value of the portfolio wouldincrease by 36.84 bps. If the yield were to go up by 50 bps, the market value of the portfolio would decrease by 36.35 bps.1. The stress test is conducted on the portfolio managed by the Treasurer's Office. Portfolios managed by outside contractors are excluded. All data is provided by SunGard.2. Gain/Loss is calcuated based on the market value/price.Portfolio Stress Test1as of March 31, 2016AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES772 Exhibit IXSecurityCouponPurchase MaturityParMarketDescriptionCUSIPRateYTMDateDateValueValue2Fund4Compton CA Community Redev Agy204712FD0 0.0000% 6.5258% 1/3/201218/1/1610,000.00 7,453.00 5033Palo Alto USD Refunding Bond697379UA1 1.4020% 1.4020% 8/14/12 8/1/17 440,000.00 440,000.00 7903University of Cal Tax Revenue Bond91412GPX7 0.6590% 0.6590% 3/14/13 5/15/16 1,240,000.00 1,240,000.00 6911University of Cal Tax Revenue Bond91412GPY5 0.9660% 0.9660% 3/14/13 5/15/17 175,000.00 175,000.00 7903Washington State GO Bond93974B3K6 5.0000% 1.3012% 6/27/1331/1/18 600,000.00 696,925.06 5057Wicomico County MD GO Bond 967545R89 3.5000% 1.6386% 6/27/13312/1/18 390,000.00 427,550.12 5057Univ of Cal Taxable Rev Bond 91412GSX4 0.9070% 0.9070% 10/2/13 5/15/16 415,000.00 415,000.00 6911Univ of Cal Taxable Rev Bond 91412GSZ9 2.0540% 2.0540% 10/2/13 5/15/18 195,000.00 195,000.00 7903State of Mississippi GO Bond 605581FX0 1.0900% 1.0900% 2/18/15 10/1/17 110,000.00 110,000.00 6911AUHSD Muni City Chicago 167486YX1 5.0000% 4.6605% 1/1/16 1/1/17 70,000.00 70,229.60 5057Total$3,645,000.00$3,777,157.781Date when the security was transferred from AUHSD to Contra Costa County Investment Pool managed by Treasurer's Office2Market Value equals Cost less purchase interest3Date when the security was transferred from Fund 5055 to Fund 5057 per AUHSD's request4 Fund #5033 - Acalanes Union High School District5057 - Acalanes Union High School District6911 - Contra Costa County Schools Insurance Group7903 - Contra Costa Community College District Retiree Health BenefitsCONTRA COSTA COUNTYTREASURER'S INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOMUNICIPAL SECURITIESMarch 31, 2016AUGUST 2, 2016CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MINUTES773